The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2015-07-07 City Council MeetingAGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING . CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2015 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of June 17, 2015 and Work Session Of June 17, 2015 • B. Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 06/18/2015 TOTAL: $647,755.45 and Per Pre -List Dated 06/25/2015 TOTAL: $4,011,408.98 and Per Pre -List Dated 07/01/2015 TOTAL: $1,052,233.38 and Credit Card Transactions dated 3/225/15-4/26/15 TOTAL: $47,309.72 C. Resolution No. 2015-65 Approving Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement 2015-2016 D. Authorize Joint Powers Purchase Agreement For Community Solar Gardens E. Resolution No. 2015-66 Supporting Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative Affordable Housing Project At 3330 66th Street In Edina F. Request For Purchase — Todd Park Basketball Court G. Request For Purchase — West Parking Lot Van Valkenburg Park H. Request For Purchase — Award Of Bid Contract ENG 15-11 2015 Sealcoating Improvements I. Human Rights & Relations Commission Resignation J. Public Art Purchase — 3 Dancing Sand Mill Cranes Sculpture V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS • VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome Agenda July 7, 2015 Page 2 to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all • speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Resolution No. 2015-67 Approving Issuance Of Bonds By Minneapolis On Behalf Of Fairview Health Services (Favorable vote of Council Members present to approve.) B. PUBLIC HEARING —Rezoning From R -I to R-2 With Lot Area And Width Variances, Mathias Mortenson, 3923 49' Street West, Ordinance No. 2015-09 And Resolution No. 2015-68 (Rezoning and variances roll call of three affirmative votes to approve.) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the • Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Affordable Housing Policy B. Ordinance No. 2015-10 Amending Time Of Sale To Certain Licensees C. Resolution No. 2015- 69 Accepting Donations & Grants IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, May 14, 2015 2. Planning Commission, June 10, 2015 3. Community Health Commission, April 7, 2015 U Agenda July 7, 2015 Page 3 • 4. Human Rights & Relations Commission, May 26, 2015 C. Advisory Communication Human Rights & Relations Commission, Resolutions On Affordable Housing In Edina X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT • The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues July 7 Work Session — Sidewalk & Street Maintenance 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Utility Rate Study 5:45 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM White Oaks Improvement Association 6:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues July 21 Work Session — Business Meeting 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 2016-2017 Proposed Budget 5:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Park & Recreation Strategic Master Plan 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 21 Regular Meering 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 4 Night To Unite Wed Aug 5 Work Session — France Avenue Working Group Update 5:00 P.M COMMUNITY ROOM Grandview Update 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Aug 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 18 Work Session — Promenade Phase 5 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 18 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Sep 8 Work Session — Heritage Preservation Board 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 8 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Wed Sep 16 Work Session —Arcs & Culture Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Sep 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues •Tues Oct 6 Oct 6 Work Session — Boards & Commission Annual Work Plans Regular Meeting 5:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 20 Work Session — Business Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Brian Olson, PE, Public Works Director Date: July 7, 2015 Subject: 2015 State of the Streets — Street and 'Sidewalk Maintenance Action Requested: No action requested. Discussion only. 0 e • 'M�nRPOIiA��9 • 1HHA Agenda )!term #: WS. III Action ❑ Discussion X Information ❑ Information / Background: Staff will provide a presentation about street and sidewalk maintenance descr,6ed in the attached memo. Attachment: 2015 State of the Streets — Street and Sidewalk Kaincenance GAPMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\PAVEMENT MGMT\N'hood Recon Program\City Council\20150707 State of Streets Cover Page.docx City of Edina ^ 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 DATE: July 7, 2015 TO: Mayor and City Council CC: Scott Neal — City Manager, FROM: Chad Millner PE — Director of Engineering, Brian Olson PE — Public Works Director RE: 2015 State of the Streets — Street and Sidewalk Maintenance Introduction Per the Comprehensive Plan, "effective transportation planning is critically important for a community such as Edina. Residents must be provided with transportation facilities and services that meet mobility needs in an efficient and safe manner. Transportation facilities need to be planned and constructed (and maintained) so as to limit social, environmental, and aesthetic impacts to the greatest degree feasible. In addition, residents who cannot or choose not to drive, need to have transportation options to meet their daily needs." What level of service we choose to provide for our streets and sidewalks is directly related to how we maintain and reconstruct our streets and sidewalks. This report details roadway facilities and describes maintenance schedules and policies that reflect priorities 0expressed in the Living Streets Policy and Plan and industry standards. The purpose of this memo and work session is to brief the council on the current state of practice of maintenance. There are strategic funding decisions that need to be discussed to maximize service life and minimize costs and limit impacts to residents. All dollar values listed are in 2015 dollars. Maintenance Practices Streets As we have discussed at previous work sessions during the "State of the Utilities", aging infrastructure continues to challenge us to determine the most efficient ways to renew, replace, or rehabilitate. There at 205 miles of streets in Edina. 164 miles are designate as local streets and 41 miles are designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets. Many of those streets were originally constructed during the 1950's and 1960's and are quickly becoming due for reinvestment. Over the years, our public works staff has extended the life of streets though the use of mill and overlay, sealcoating, crack sealing, and patching. Staff has prioritized those streets with the greatest need to delay the need for reconstruction. This prioritization has been reactionary based on complaints from resident and based on available budget dollars, not actual need. Over the past 17 -years, we have reconstructed 75 miles of streets; 64 miles of local streets and I I miles of MSA streets. The construction of new streets has provided an opportunity to be more proactive in our maintenance operations and we have been moving more in that direction. • ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 . Fax 952-826-0392 Streets are designed for anticipated traffic volumes and vehicles loads. An increase in load or volume, outside of the original design assumptions, reduces the service life of the pavement. Streets are designed for approximately a 25 -year service life without any maintenance. With specific maintenance operations at key points in the life of a pavement, service life can be extended to at least to 40 -years and possibly as long as 60 - years. Service life is based on pavement degradation. Pavements have degradation curves that are well known within the industry. Our research on pavement service life has shown a general understanding of pavement service life but not specific deterioration curves based on specific maintenance operations. The conceptual maintenance degradation curves shown below (Figure 1) were developed using industry standards. The purple curve assumes minimal maintenance and the shortest service life. The green curve assumes strategic investments in maintenance operations and the longest service life. Street maintenance staff uses these practices to extend pavement service life: crack sealing, seal coating, edge mill and overlay, and full mill and overlay. Seal coating is a process of placing oil and rock to make the pavements more watertight. This is typically done as the first maintenance operation within the first 7-10 years. An edge mill and overlay, mills the edge of the pavement near the concrete curb and gutter and then places a new layer of bituminous pavement across the entire width of the street. This practice renews the pavement and helps the edge continue to be watertight. The final maintenance practice is a full mill and overlay. Milling off of the pavement is completed to a specific depth the entire width of the road sometimes down to the •underlying aggregate base materials and re -paved in one or multiple layers of new bituminous pavement. Renewal of the pavement structure does not address the underlying aggregate base. Our current practices of maintenance and reconstruction have started to influence our estimated average pavement condition index (PCI) for our local streets as shown in the table below. Year of Estimated PCI Estimated Average PCI 2011 57 2012 51 2013 51 2014 54 2015 57 Please recall pavements between 65 and 45 are considered optimal for maintenance while pavements below 45 should be considered for reconstruction. On our local streets, our seal coat budget is currently $100,000 annually and we estimate our mill and overlay budget at $800,000. Both include labor, equipment, and materials. As shown in Figure I, there are opportunities for maintenance that will provide longer service life for our street pavements. The benefits of longer street life are reductions in life cycle costs, less frequency reconstruction and less frequent assessments, and a higher average PCI that leads to fewer complaints about the condition of our streets. • ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 . Fax 952-826-0392 • IN w 80 70 30 0 Im 0 ------------ _ 0 10 30 SC 40 f0 N —No Maintenance ( Recon @ 32 yrs, Ave PCI = 67) - Reactive Maintenance (Edge Mill @ 25, Edge Mill @ 40, Misc @ 50-60, Ave PCI = 57) —Proactive Maintenance (Sealcoat @ 7, Resurface @ 23, Edge Mill @ 41, Recon @ 60, Ave PCI - 89) Figure I. Pavement Service Life and Maintenance Practices Based on the green degradation curve shown in Figure 1, which is a proactive maintenance practice, there are some concerns with our maintenance funding. The seal coat budget should be satisfactory and meet our needs. The mill and overlay budget is underfunded. We are estimating a need of approximately $1,000,000 annually to be proactive in our maintenance practices. This is a deficit of $200,000 annually. Each year we strategically maintain our streets with the available budget. As our streets become due for maintenance, the need for additional funding increases. With continued deficits, our maintenance will fall behind. We are not at critical point yet as most of our streets were reconstructed within the last 17 -years. Our increased use of asset management software is allowing us to build our own pavement degradation curves specific to Edina. This will continue to make our operations more efficient. There will be opportunities for the council to consider increases in maintenance funding for our local streets. Options we have identified that need further analysis are diverting more general fund revenue, increasing franchise fees, or street improvement districts (this would require legislative action and has been discussed for 4Vany years at the state legislature). ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 is Maintenance practices and budgets directly reflect expectations for our expected level of service. Some communities have a goal PCI. Maintenance practices can be adjusted based on the level of service expectations. If our goal is a low PCI, our maintenance funding need will be reduced but service life will be reduced, reconstruction will be needed sooner and complaints may increase. If we have a higher goal PCI, our maintenance funding needs will increase but service life will be extended, reconstruction will occur less frequently and complaints will decrease. Figure 2 shows conceptually where the optimal point is on the funding versus condition curve. Too little maintenance and it drives our streets towards reconstruction, to much maintenance and we are over spending on maintenance. The goal is to find the optimal point to maintenance a high PCI value with the least amount of capital. Funding vs. Condition Analysis High fundin6 -- 6«ena�ua�onl Low 60 6S so SS 60 65 70 75 8a a5 90 Condition (PCU Figure 2. Funding vs. Condition Analysis The analysis above is for our local street system. Our Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets also have a need for maintenance. The MSA program allocates construction and maintenance funds to cities with populations greater than 5,000. Our allocations are based on population and construction needs. We intend to complete a similar analysis for our MSA system to determine if we are receiving adequate funding to proactively maintain that system. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard 9 Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov t, 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 Sidewalks There are 77 miles of existing sidewalks in Edina. 57 miles are 5 -ft wide and maintained by city staff. The remaining 20 miles are 4 -ft wide and maintained by the adjacent residents. Out, sidewalk snow removal equipment is approximately 5 -ft wide and does not fit on 4 -ft wide sidewalks. The current level of service to clear snow from the 57 miles of city maintained sidewalks is 2 days. This requires 5 workers with 5 machines. It is an approximately $325,000 annual expense that includes labor, equipment and materials. Within the past year, an updated Sidewalk Facilities Map was approved and amended into the Comprehensive Plan. This plan would increase the amount of sidewalks from 77 miles to 118 miles. Based on our current practice, it would add 17 miles to the City's maintenance responsibilities and 24 miles to the resident's responsibilities. The build out of the plan is expected to occur over at least 20 -years while taking advantage of the saving realized by combining sidewalk installation with street reconstruction projects. At build out, the city will have to add 2 additional staff and machines to meet our current level of service of 2 days per snow event. This is estimated to increase our annual operating expense by $125,000 to $450,000 per year. Many times we hear comments from residents about maintaining all the sidewalks in town. There are major concerns with this idea. First, our equipment is too big to maintain the smaller 4 -ft wide sidewalks. Research into various types of sidewalk snowplowing equipment finds that they would be undersized and it would increase staff time and effort compared the same amount of the larger 5 -ft wide sidewalks. If the city maintained all the sidewalks in town, we would either have to reconstruct all the 4 -ft wide sidewalks with a considerable cost and impacts or contract out this work. Staff recommends continuing to maintain MSA, Active Routes to School and park sidewalks and not increasing our responsibility on residential sidewalks. Accomplishments In 2014 the Public Works Department fixed 3,508 potholes, overlaid 3.97 miles and sealcoated 2.0 miles of bituminous streets, and poured approximately 400 cubic yards of concrete to repair our concrete streets. They also completed the following: • Resurfacing of the east half of Van Valkenburg Park • 50th France Parking Ramp Improvements • Implemented Public Stuff (Edina to Go) • Replaced traffic signal cabinet and installed I st art wrap at the corner of 66th and Valley View Road In 2014 and 2015, the Engineering Department lead projects that reconstructed 10.3 miles of local and 1.0 mile of MSA streets, installed 5.1 miles of sidewalk, and installed 1.0 miles of bicycle lane striping. *addition to the many reconstruction projects, the Engineering department's continuous improvement itiatives led to the following changes: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 • Branded and began implementing the Living Streets Plan. • Refined Infrastructure Condition Assessments and Selection Criteria for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Projects. • Increased use of asset management tools • Created a new Sidewalk Facilities Map and amended it into the Comprehensive Plan • Improved our public right of way management • Improvements in neighborhood street reconstruction program resident communications Last year also saw the roll out of a mobile application "Edina To Go." This project was led by Communications and Technology Services Department and upon roll out was linked directly to Public Works service requests in the Cityworks asset management software. Now residents have access to an app to request: pothole repair, damaged mailbox or sod, fire hydrant inspections, weed issues, street light out, traffic safety, water leaks and more. Conclusions Our transportation systems, specifically streets and sidewalks are vital to Edina's quality of life. Our decisions have economic, social and environmental impacts. We continue to make recommendations with our mission statement in mind: "Our mission is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure ... ... in a manner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses." 40 GA W\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\PAVEMENT MGMT\N'hood Recon Program\City Counci1\20I 50707 State of Streets Memo.docx is ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 • To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: WS. IV. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Action ❑ Discussion FA Date: July 7, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Utility Rate Study Action Requested: Review and discuss a draft Utility Rate Study for 2016 rates. Information / Background: The City hired Ehlers to complete the last Utility Rate Study in late 2013 for 2014 rates. Due to increasing capital costs for our utility system that were identified during the 2014 Capital Improvement Planning process, the City has again hired Ehlers to update the rate study for 2016 rates. • Representatives from Ehlers and City staff will be at the rate study to discuss the preliminary results. Attachments: Powerpoint presentations slides Proposed rate schedule Sample bills •i City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 � \ .a.n..i.._.... �� •,� � �� i �� ! des �_�F: .. JO . "`r•��i ..ares i EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE City of Edina Utility Rate Study Nick Anhut and Jessica Cook - Ehlers 0 Key Findings • Utility funds are in good financial health • Contribute to AAA/Aaa bond ratings • Minor adjustments recommended for water • Revised CIP puts pressure on sanitary and storm sewer rates • Discussion of development related connection fees 2 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE History • First rate study completed in 2009 to address $8M Country Club street reconstruction • Added conservation rates for water • Updated every 1-3 years 2015 update prompted by revised CI P for street reconstruction • No change to rate structure considered in this analysis 3 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE 0 0 0 • • • Street Reconstruction Policy • Street reconstruction provides an opportunity to strategically address our utility infrastructure needs. • Impacts average annual CIP costs related to streets Water $2.3 million $2.0 million -13% Sanitary $1.4 million $2.5 million 80% Sewer Storm Sewer $2.4 million $3.2 million 33% • Revised CIP puts pressure on sanitary and storm sewer funds 4 E HLE RS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Water • Capital costs increasing due to — Road reconstruction — $9 million water treatment plant in 2017-2018 $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 5 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 O Debt and Capital Costs iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii0perating Expenses Operating Revenue Water Rates • No changes needed to rate structure • Recommend 4.75% annual increase 2016-2025 • Rate increases apply to- - Fixed charge — All tiers — Morningside rates • Less than 2013's recommended 5.25% rate increase — New meters accurately measure consumption — Operating expenses have declined since 2013 — Growth will generate future revenue 6 EHLERS jP LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Revenues from Growth Help Offset Costs • Assumed new multifamily housing 2016-2018 2019 and beyond 240 units per year 30 units per year • Proposed connection fees will generate almost $2.2 Million over next 10 years • Within 5 years, new users will be paying $100,000/yr. • Without growth, annual rate increases would be 5.00% per year vs. 4.75% IsEHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Winter Quarter Bill (30 Units/2Z500 Gallons) Summer Quarter Bill (50 Units/37, 500 Gallons) $62.41 $100.31 $62.44 $100.53 8 _ EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE 0 Consistent, Affordable Water Rates $3.00 $2.80 $2.60 $2.40 $2.20 $2.00 $1.80 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 i $1.00 s Proposed Rates for Tier 1 Water 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2015 Rate Study 2013 Rate Study 2011 Rate Study EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE 0 0 0 Sanitary Sewer • MCES disposal charge is biggest expense in sewer • Expected to increase 5% annually 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 W 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 • Collection Systems ■ Operations ■ MCES Charges 10 `` - EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Mir Sanitary Sewer Rates • Recommend 4.5% rate increase 2016-2025 • Higher than 3.25% recommendation in 2013 study — MCES charges increased 12% between 2013 and 2014 — Average annual capital costs increased $1.1 million since last study • Sewer fund financially stable EMERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE • • • Combined Sewer and Water Cash Balance 12,000,000 8,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 C 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ■Target Cash Balance ❑ Unrestricted Cash Balance • About 45% of sewer projects will be financed with bonds • About 70% of water projects will be financed with bonds 12 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Proposed SAC and WAC Fees • Significant increase in 2016 • 7% annual increase thereafter • Fees remain competitive SAC $400 $500 $625 $1,000 $1,070 WAC $1,000 $2,000 2 140 Total $1,200 $1,500 $1,875 $3,000 $3,210 13 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE City Connection Fees are Competitive ►• 111 III $6,000 $5,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 63 Eden Prairie Edina 2015 Edina Chanhassen Minnetonka St. Louis 2015 Proposed 2015 2015 Park 2016 Bloomington, Hopkins, and Richfield do not have connection fees 14 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Storm Sewer • Capital needs increasing for road reconstruction and water quality projects $7,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 15 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 o Debt Service and Capital Operating Expenses (excluding Depreciation) Operating Revenues EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE 0 0 0 Storm Sewer — Option #1 Recommended rate increase is 6.75 % per year (vs. 6% in 2013 study) Storm Sewer Fund Cash Balance 5,000,000 4,500,000 ®Target Cash Balance r 16 EHLERS - LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Storm Sewer Rates — Option #2 • $100,000/yr. in storm water operating costs now paid from General Fund • Can move the costs to the Storm Sewer Fund • Fee Impact — 10% increase in 2016 (vs. 6.75%) — 6.75% annual increase in 2017 and beyond • Pros: — Tax exempt property would pay its full share of storm water costs — Could reduce levy or provide more capacity in general fund • Cons: — Increases storm sewer rates 17 EHL -E -RS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE is • • 0 0 0 Residential Storm Sewer Bill Option #1 $24.26 $25.90 $27.64 $29.51 Option #2 $24.26 $26.68 $28.49 $30.41 • Decision can be made in context of general fund budget discussions 18 EHLERS WWI LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Sample Utility Bills Sample Family Quarterly Bill 2015 2016 2017 2018 Winter months - 30 units water and sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 Water 61.19 64.10 67.14 70.33 Storm Water 24.26 25.90 27.64 29.51 Total $ 187.79 $ 196.94 $ 206.54 $ 216.63 Combined Fee Increase $ 7.61 $ 9.15 $ 9.61 $ 10.08 Percent Increase 4.23% 4.87% 4.88% 4.88% Summer months - 50 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 Water 97.39 102.02 106.86 111.94 Storm Water 24.26 25.90 27.64 29.51 Total $ 223.99 $ 234.86 $ 246.27 $ 258.24 Combined Fee Increase $ 9.45 $ 10.87 $ 11.41 $ 11.97 Percent Increase 4.40% 4.85% 4.86% 4.86% • Assumes Option #1 for Storm Sewer (6.75% annual increase) we EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Utility Bill Comparison Comparison of Utility Bills For Single Family Customer (Using 27,000 gal water and 13,000 gal sewer per quarter) $175.00 $150.00 $125.00 $100.00 $75.00 $50.00 $25.00 $0.00 i _ , 1- _ L City of Edina City of Edina City of City of Eden City of Proposed 2015 Bloomington Prairie Hopkins 2016 City of City of City of St. Minnetonka Richfield Louis Park El Water ❑ Sewer ❑ Storm Water 20 -10 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Summary of Recommendations • Water rate increase 4.75% • Convert bills from cubic feet to gallons • Sewer rate increase 4.5% • Storm water rate increase 6.75% • Adopt rates for three to five years at a time • Increase SAC and WAC fees to defray cost of growth • Future considerations: — Fully fund storm water costs with utility fund? — Review additional water conservation measures 21 EHLERS a LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE 0 0 0 Nick Anhut Financial Advisor 651-697-8507 nanhut@ehlers-inc.com 22 FREERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Jessica Cook Financial Specialist 651-697-8546 jcook@ehlers-inc.com .Ty Prepared by Ehlers Proposed 2016 2017 2018 Water Rates Quarterly Usage Rates 0-35 units $ 1.52 $ 1.59 $ 1.67 36-65 units $ 2.02 $ 2.12 $ 2.22 > 65 units $ 3.16 $ 3.31 $ 3.47 Morningside Future rate increases for the Morningside area is dependent on Quarterly Fixed Rates -Based on Meter Size 3/4"-5/8" $ 18.53 $ 19.41 $ 20.33 1 " $ 25.27 $ 26.47 $ 27.72 1.25" $ 28.83 $ 30.20 $ 31.63 1.5" $ 32.42 $ 33.96 $ 35.57 2" $ 52.21 $ 54.69 $ 57.28 3" $ 198.25 $ 207.67 $ 217.53 4" $ 252.34 $ 264.33 $ 276.88 Sanitary Sewer Rates Quarterly Usage Rates $ 3.56 $ 3.73 $ 3.89 Quarterly Fixed Rates $ 57.04 $ 59.60 $ 62.29 Storm Sewer Rates Option #1: 6.75% Increase in 2016 $ 25.90 $ 27.64 $ 29.51 Option #2: 1.0% Increase in 2016 $ 26.68 $ 28.49 $ 30.41 6/15/2015 0 0 0 • . • City of Edina Sample Projected Residential Utility Bills Water decreasing to 4.75%; Sewer increasing at 4.50%; Storm increasing at 6.75% Sample Famil Quarterly Bill 2015 2015 2017 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Winter months - 30 units water and sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 Sewer 116.79 102.34 127.54 106.95 111.76 116.79 122.04 127.54 133.28 Water 292.64 61.19 Storm Water 64.10 67.14 70.33 73.67 77.17 80.84 Storm Water Total $ 24.26 375.90 $ 25.90 27.64 29.51 31.50 33.63 35.90 Total $ 187.79 $ 196.94 $ 206.54 $ 216.63 $ 227.22 $ 238.33 $ 250.01 Combined Fee Increase $ 7.61 $ 9.15 $ 9.61 $ 10.08 $ 10.59 $ 11.12 $ 11.67 Percent Increase 4.23% 4.87% 4.88% 4.88% 4.89% 4.89% 4.90% Summer months - 50 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 122.04 127.54 133.28 Water 97.39 102.02 106.86 111.94 117.25 122.82 128.66 Storm Water 24.26 25.90 27.64 29.51 31.50 33.63 35.90 Total $ 223.99 $ 234.86 $ 246.27 $ 258.24 $ 270.80 $ 283.99 $ 297.83 Combined Fee Increase $ 9.45 $ 10.87 $ 11.41 $ 11.97 $ 12.56 $ 13.19 $ 13.84 Percent Increase 4.40% 4.85% 4.86% 4.86% 4.87% 4.87% 4.87% Sample Summer Bill - High Water User 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 100 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 122.04 127.54 133.28 Water 232.04 243.06 254.61 266.70 279.37 292.64 306.54 Storm Water 24.26 25.90 27.64 29.51 31.50 33.63 35.90 Total $ 358.64 $ 375.90 $ 394.01 $ 413.00 $ 432.92 $ 453.80 $ 475.71 Combined Fee Increase $ 16.06 $ 17.26 $ 18.11 $ 18.99 $ 19.92 $ 20.89 $ 21.91 Percent Increase 4.69% 4.81% 4.82% 4.82% 4.82% 4.83% 4.83% Sample Bill for Low Utility User 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 12 units water and sewer Sewer (minimum quarterly rate) 54.58 57.04 59.60 62.29 65.09 68.02 71.08 Water 35.09 36.76 38.50 40.33 42.25 44.25 46.36 Storm Water 24.26 25.90 27.64 29.51 31.50 33.63 35.90 Total $ 113.93 $ 119.69 $ 125.75 $ 132.13 $ 138.84 $ 145.90 $ 153.33 Combined Fee Increase $ 4.83 $ 5.76 $ 6.06 $ 6.38 $ 6.71 $ 7.06 $ 7.43 Percent Increase 4.42% 5.06% 5.06% 5.07% 5.08% 5.09% 5.09% Prepared by Ehlers 6/15/2015 City of Edina Sample Projected Residential Utility Bills Water decreasing to 4.75%; Sewer increasing at 4.50%; Storm increasing at 10% for FY 2016 and 6.75% thereafter Sample Family Quarterly Bill 2015 2015 2017 2016 2019 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Winter months - 30 units water and sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 Sewer 127.54 102.34 Water 106.95 243.06 111.76 116.79 122.04 127.54 133.28 Water 24.26 61.19 28.49 64.10 32.46 67.14 70.33 73.67 77.17 80.84 Storm Water 413.90 $ 24.26 454.83 $ 26.68 Combined Fee Increase $ 28.49 30.41 32.46 34.65 36.99 Total $ 187.79 $ 197.73 $ 207.39 $ 217.53 $ 228.18 $ 239.36 $ 251.10 Combined Fee Increase $ 7.61 $ 9.94 $ 9.66 $ 10.14 $ 10.65 $ 11.18 $ 11.74 Percent Increase 4.23% 5.29% 4.88% 4.89% 4.90% 4.90% 4.91% Summer months - 50 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 122.04 127.54 133.28 Water 97.39 102.02 106.86 111.94 117.25 122.82 128.66 Storm Water 24.26 26.68 28.49 30.41 32.46 34.65 36.99 Total $ 223.99 $ 235.65 $ 247.11 $ 259.13 $ 271.76 $ 285.01 $ 298.92 Combined Fee Increase $ 9.45 $ 11.66 $ 11.46 $ 12.03 $ 12.63 $ 13.25 $ 13.91 Percent Increase 4.40% 5.20% 4.86% 4.87% 4.87% 4.88% 4.88% Sample Summer Bill - High Water User 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 100 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 122.04 127.54 133.28 Water 232.04 243.06 254.61 266.70 279.37 292.64 306.54 Storm Water 24.26 26.68 28.49 30.41 32.46 34.65 36.99 Total $ 358.64 $ 376.69 $ 394.85 $ 413.90 $ 433.87 $ 454.83 $ 476.81 Combined Fee Increase $ 16.06 $ 18.05 $ 18.16 $ 19.05 $ 19.98 $ 20.95 $ 21.98 Percent Increase 4.69% 5.03% 4.82% 4.82% 4.83% 4.83% 4.83% Sample Bill for Low Utility User 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 12 units water and sewer Sewer (minimum quarterly rate) 54.58 57.04 59.60 62.29 65.09 68.02 71.08 Water 35.09 36.76 38.50 40.33 42.25 44.25 46.36 Storm Water 24.26 26.68 28.49 30.41 32.46 34.65 36.99 Total $ 113.93 $ 120.48 $ 126.59 $ 133.03 $ 139.80 $ 146.93 $ 154.43 Combined Fee Increase $ 4.83 $ 6.55 $ 6.11 $ 6.43 $ 6.77 $ 7.13 $ 7.50 Percent Increase 4.42% 5.75% 5.07% 5.08% 5.09% 5.10% 5.11% Prepared by Ehlers 6/15/2015 • • • AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2015 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of June 17, 2015 and Work • V1. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome Session Of June 17, 2015 • B. Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 06/18/2015 TOTAL: $647,755.45 and Per Pre -List Dated 06/25/2015 TOTAL: $4,011,408.98 and Per Pre -List Dated 07/01/2015 TOTAL: $1,052,233.38 and Credit Card Transactions dated 3/225/15-4/26/15 TOTAL: $47,309.72 C. Resolution No. 2015-65 Approving Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement 2015-2016 D. Authorize Joint Powers Purchase Agreement For Community Solar Gardens E. Resolution No. 2015-66 Supporting Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative Affordable Housing Project At 3330 66' Street In Edina F. Request For Purchase — Todd Park Basketball Court G. Request For Purchase — West Parking Lot Van Valkenburg Park H. Request For Purchase — Award Of Bid Contract ENG 15-1 1 2015 Sealcoating Improvements I. Human Rights & Relations Commission Resignation J. Public Art Purchase — 3 Dancing Sand Mill Cranes Sculpture V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS • V1. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome Agenda July 7, 2015 Page 2 to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Resolution No. 2015-67 Approving Issuance Of Bonds By Minneapolis On Behalf Of Fairview Health Services (Favorable vote of Council Members present to approve.) B. PUBLIC HEARING —Rezoning From R- I to R-2 With Lot Area And Width Variances, Mathias Mortenson, 3923 49`h Street West, Ordinance No. 2015-09 And Resolution No. 2015-68 (Rezoning and variances roll call of three affirmative votes to approve.) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share • new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Affordable Housing Policy B. Ordinance No. 2015-10 Amending Time Of Sale To Certain Licensees C. Resolution No. 2015- 69 Accepting Donations & Grants IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes: I. Energy & Environment Commission, May 14, 2015 2. Planning Commission, June 10, 2015 3. Community Health Commission, April 7, 2015 Is J Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Wed Wed Tues Tues Tues Tues Wed *d S es Tues Tues Agenda July 7, 2015 Page 3 4. Human Rights & Relations Commission, May 26, 2015 C. Advisory Communication Human Rights & Relations Commission, Resolutions On Affordable Housing In Edina X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE X1. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS July 7 Work Session — Sidewalk & Street Maintenance 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Utility Rate Study 5:45 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM White Oaks Improvement Association 6:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM July 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS July 21 Work Session — Business Meeting 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 2016-2017 Proposed Budget 5:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Park & Recreation Strategic Master Plan 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM July 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Aug 4 Night To Unite Aug 5 Work Session — France Avenue Working Group Update 5:00 P.M COMMUNITY ROOM Grandview Update 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Aug 18 Work Session — Promenade Phase 5 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Aug 18 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Sep 8 Work Session — Heritage Preservation Board 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sep 8 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sep 16 Work Session — Arts & Culture Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sep 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 6 Work Session — Boards & Commission Annual Work Plans 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 20 Work Session — Business Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 17, 2015 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda as revised to add Item V.D. Introduce Assistant City Manager Lisa Schaefer. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.E. Resolution No. 2015-55 Granting Preliminary Plat Concord Avenue with Variance; IV.G. Request for Purchase, Braemar Master Plan — Golf Course Design Services, Richard Mandell Golf Architecture; IV.H. Board and Commission Student Appointments; and, IV.S. Resolution No. 2015-61 Establishing Limited Clean Up and Property Damage Protection for Sewer Back-ups and Water Main Breaks for Water and Sewer Customers, as follows: • IV.A. Approve work session meeting minutes of May 27, 2015 and regular and work session meeting minutes of June 2, 2015 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 4, 2015, and consisting of 34 pages; General Fund $143,180.38; Police Special Revenue $311.61; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $15,239.24; Arts and Culture Fund $883.10; Working Capital Fund $200,813.51; Equipment Replacement Fund $169,645.75; Art Center Fund $4,025.42; Golf Dome Fund $1,368.91; Aquatic Center Fund $6,870.58; Golf Course Fund $156,418.84; Ice Arena Fund $8,051.69; Sports Dome Fund $5,201.18; Edinborough Park Fund $20,418.99; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,324.32; Liquor Fund $100,166.78; Utility Fund $158,714.1 1; Storm Sewer Fund $4,504.15; PSTF Agency Fund $6,049.59; Centennial TIF District $1,500.00; Grandview TIF District $1,677.50; Southdale 2 District $6,671.67; TOTAL $1,015,037.32 and for receipt of payment of claims dated June 1 I, 2015, and consisting of 34 pages; General Fund $375,032.60; Police Special Revenue $7,300.09; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $11,948.80; Arts and Culture Fund $500.00; Working Capital Fund $41,433.64; Equipment Replacement Fund $50,161.05; Cando Fund $3,593.00; Art Center Fund $1,256.04; Golf Dome Fund $1,458.64; Aquatic Center Fund $36,414.30; Golf Course Fund $32,034.22; Ice Arena Fund $32,386.59; Sports Dome Fund $1,906.56; Edinborough Park Fund $591.17; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,573.03; Liquor Fund $300,014.50; Utility Fund $444,581.32; Storm Sewer Fund $8,683.26; Recycling Fund $36,187.38; PSTF Agency Fund $3,354.99; Centennial TIF District $7,186.64; Payroll Fund $10,667.1 I; TOTAL $1,409,264.93; and, Credit Card Transactions dated February 26 — March 25, 2015; TOTAL $47,328.61 IV.C. Approve Memorandum of Understanding Xcel Energy Partners in Energy Program IV.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-58, Authorizing Minnesota Court Data Services Master Subscriber Agreement M.E. Resolution No. 2015 55, Granting Preliminary Plat Concord Avenue with Variance Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/June 17, 2015 IV.F. Request for Purchase, Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Software House International - MN State Contract No. 436392 at $50,553.00 M.G.> Richard is Mandell Golf Architecture M.H. Board and Commission Student Appointments IVA. Request for Purchase, Award of Quote - Contract ENG 15-INB Valley View Road Landscaping (McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace), awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Cedar Ridge Landscaping at $36,541.52 IV.J. Request for Purchase, Authorize Engineering Services for Parklawn Avenue Street Reconstruction Project, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Short Elliot Hendrickson Inc. at $99,991.00 IV.K. Authorize Cost Share Agreement and Maintenance Plan with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, Braemar Driving Range Project IV.L. Receive Sidewalk Project Update - Cornelia Drive Between West 66th and West 70th Streets IV.M. Receive Traffic Safety Committee Report of May 6, 2015 IV.N. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-59, Calling Public Hearing for Consent for Fairview Southdale Hospital Bond Issue IV.O. Authorize Master Agreement Engineering Services - Oertel Architects, LLC IV.P. Request for Purchase, 2015 Sidewalk Snow Plow for Public Works - Streets, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Mac Queen Equipment at $90,580 IV.Q. Approve 2015-2016 City Insurance Contracts IV.R. Approve Liability Coverage Statutory Limits M.S. Resolution No. 2015 61, Establishing Limited Clean Up and Property Damage Protection Ifor Sewer Back ups and Water Main Breaks- for rWi-^liter and Sewer Customers Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-55 GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT CONCORD AVENUE WITH VARIANCE - ADOPTED Member Swenson indicated she had voted against this item at the June 2, 2015 City Council meeting and did not want to vote to approve as part of the Consent Agenda. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-55, Approving a Preliminary Plat with Variance at 5945 Concord Avenue, subject to the following Conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plan shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated May 8, 2015. d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume of stormwater to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to • saw -cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/June 17, 2015 h. Both lots shall be subject to the City's tree ordinance. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Stewart, Hovland Nays: Staunton, Swenson Motion carried. IV.G. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, BRAEMAR MASTER PLAN — GOLF COURSE DESIGN SERVICES, RICHARD MANDELL GOLF ARCHITECTURE — APPROVED Braemar Golf Course General Manager Abood answered a question of the Council relating to the negotiation efforts in regard to the Mr. Mandell's 6.25% fee. Mr. Abood explained that the fee started at 7.5% and was negotiated down to 6.25% not to exceed $395,000.00. The.Council discussed looking for construction observation and/or contract administration in addition to or instead of the architect completing bid administration. Staff noted that there was an additional $50,000.00 in the contract for bid administration that could be declined. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to approve the Request for Purchase, Braemar Master Plan — Golf Course Design Services, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Richard Mandell Golf Architecture at $395,000.00. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.H. BOARD AND COMMISSION STUDENT APPOINTMENTS —APPROVED Member Brindle explained that the City had received thirty applications for sixteen student Board and Commission positions. Member Brindle and Member Stewart had interviewed the applicants and were excited to recommend the following appointments. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to appoint Olivia Chen and Farhia Osman (Alternate — Hugh Cashman) to the Arts and Culture Commission; Jessica Hong and Nina Sokol (Alternate — Anushe Nath) to the Community Health Commission; Sarah Stefanik and Emily Reinke (Alternate — Allison Risser) to the Energy and Environment Commission; Peter Otness and Payton Puerzer (Alternate — Will Jadkowski) to the Heritage Preservation Board; Caitlin Kearney and Sidharth Ramesh (Alternate — Gabriel Brosius) to the Human Rights and Relations Commission; Aanik Lohani and Lauren Grist (Alternate — Ellie Bender) to the Park Board; Amy Ma and Peter Kivimaki (Alternate — Sam Parmekar) to the Planning Commission; and, Emily Ding and Lindsey Ruehl (Alternate — Anand Mittal) to the Transportation Commission. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.S. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-61 ESTABLISHING LIMITED CLEAN UP AND PROPERTY DAMAGE PROTECTION FOR SEWER BACK-UPS AND WATER MAIN BREAKS FOR WATER AND SEWER CUSTOMERS — ADOPTED The Council asked staff for a report on how the rainfall amounts in I.D. of the Resolution were determined. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-61, Establishing Limited Clean Up and Property Damage Protection for Sewer Back -Ups and Water Main Breaks for Water and Sewer Customers. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 — ACCEPTED Finance Director Roggeman explained that Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co. had conducted an audit of the City's finances. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/June 17, 2015 James Eichten, Certified Public Account from Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., explained the auditor's role and presented the audit results, management report, and audit summary. There were no findings. The City was experiencing continued improvement in overall financial results and the financial records were in excellent condition. 0 The Council thanked Mr. Roggeman and the Finance Department for its hard work. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to accept the Comprehensive Annual Finance Report (CAFR) for year ended December 31, 2014. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V.B. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PROJECT UPDATES, ANDREW LUTAYA AND APRIL CROCKETT— UPDATED Andrew Lutaya, Minnesota Department of Transportation, presented a map of projects in Hennepin County and discussed some of the key projects. Mr. Lutaya responded to the Council's questions relating to sound walls, funding for projects, and neighborhood traffic when Highway 169 was closed for construction. V.C. MAY SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED —TOPIC: COMMERCIAL AREAS Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of May opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to Commercial Areas. Mr. Gilgenbach answered a question of the Council relating to identifying commenter's as residents or non-residents of Edina. V.D. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER LISA SCHAEFER —INTRODUCED Manager Neal introduced the new Assistant City Manager Lisa Schaefer. Ms. Schaefer thanked Manager Neal and the Council for the opportunity and shared some of her work experience including her last four years as Edina's Human Resources Director. 0 VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-60 AWARDING THE SALE OF $14,275,000 GO BONDS SERIES 2015-A — ADOPTED Finance Director Roggeman explained that the City was issuing bonds for local street improvements, water and storm utility improvements, and parking improvements at 50th and France. Mr. Roggeman introduced Nick Anhut, Ehlers & Associates. Mr. Anhut reported on the bond sale results and bids received. The City held a rating call and was affirmed with a AAA rating, the highest rating. The winning bid for the Series 2015A bonds was from Piper Jaffray who proposed a premium structure. The total amount was downsized to $14,275,000.00 Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-60, Authorizing Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of $14,275,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2015A. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-62 AWARDING THE SALE OF $2,140,000 GO BONDS SERIES • 2015B — ADOPTED Mr. Anhut explained that the Series 2015B bonds included financing for the clubhouse, driving range, and Par 3 course improvements to the Braemar Golf Enterprise. The low bidder was Baird who proposed a smaller premium downsizing the total amount to $2,140,000.00 Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/June 17, 2015 Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-62, Authorizing Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of $2,140,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2015B. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 20I S-64 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT — ADOPTED Mr. Anhut explained that the Resolution authorizes execution of updates to lease agreements the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority has with the City of Edina. The lease requires updating to allow the City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority to issue revenue refunding bonds. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-64, Authorizing the Execution of a First Amendment to Lease Agreement Providing for the Issuance of Revenue Refunding Bonds by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and Approving the Form of a First Amendment to Lease Agreement, Bond Resolution and an Official Statement. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.D PARIS RECREATION AND TRAILS STRATEGIC PLAN — POSTPONED TO WORK SESSION Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh discussed the background and steps leading up to the Park, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan. Terry Minarik, Confluence, presented the final draft of the Park, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan. Mr. Minarik shared an overview of the document; community needs assessment; parks classifications and assessments; key areas of development; guiding principles; key projects including: I. Create a multi -use trail system through the City to connect parks and facilities, 2. Provide a multi -generational community center, 3. Hire a natural resource manager to guide preservation and development of natural areas, access, and educational opportunities, 4. Improve marketing and communication delivery, 5. Replace or decommission community park buildings that have outlived their design lifespan, 6. Relocate or renovate the Edina Art Center, 7. Replace inadequate and outdated play areas, 8. Improve branding and wayfinding to parks, 9. Strengthen financial stability, 10. Provide additional community gathering areas, 11. Develop community driven master plans for parks, 12. Develop business plan for all enterprise facilities; and a framework for implementing the plan. Mr. Minarik answered questions of the Council relating to accessibility and engagement for all residents, online availability of the Plan, and the Community Center. The Council discussed the possible Community Center and whether the need was based on the community needs assessments or because other communities had one. The Council decided to postpone adoption until after holding a work session to further discuss the possibility of a Community Center. Staff answered a question of the Council relating to funding for signage. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, postponing adoption of the Park, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan until a Work Session was scheduled. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.E. DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES OF FRANCE AVENUE SOUTHDALE AREA — APPROVED Mr. Teague introduced Robb Gruman from the Southdale France Avenue Work Group. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/June 17, 2015 Mr. Gruman reviewed Stage One efforts and deliverables; work group dialogue; meetings including kick-off, group meetings, and check-in; working principles; supporting questions; and anticipated Stage Two work efforts. He answered questions of the Council relating to the district vision, the geographic scope, broadening the work group, and the process towards the Comprehensive Plan. The Council discussed whether to include the word "vision" in the first working principle and agreed to use "principles". The Council identified the geographic scope of the project as the greater Southdale area noting that the principles could be used throughout the district. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the Development Principles for the Greater Southdale Area, as revised to change "vision" to "principles" in the first working principle. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.F. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-63 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-63 accepting various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vlll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. ADVISORY COMMUNICATIONS — ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION: RECOMMENDATION TO PARTICIPATE IN COMMUNITY SOLAR GARDEN PROJECT LED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL — Received VIII.C. MINUTES: 1. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, APRIL 28, 2015 2. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, APRIL 15, 2015 3. PARK BOARD, MAY 12, 2015 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 1 1:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 7, 2015. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 17, 2015, meeting available. Page 6 • MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 17 2015 6:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were: Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Service Director; Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Devin Massopust, City Management Fellow; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner; and Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager. Edina Transportation Commissioners attending the meeting included: Emily Boettge, Surya Iyer, Jennifer Janovy, Tom LaForce, Paul, Nelson, Larry Olson, Dawn Spanhake and Chair Katherine Bass. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 2015 WORK PLAN PROGRESS REVIEW Chair Bass with the assistance of other Commissioners updated the City Council on the Commission's progress for the 2015 Transportation Commission Work Plan. Items discussed included: multimodal traffic survey sent two years in advance of reconstruction, potential circulator in the Greater Southdale 40 area, progress on Living Streets, work with Edina Schools regarding Active Routes To Schools and possible traffic management for Valley View Road between Gleason and Antrim Road, status of Bike Edina, and the Commission's role in the next Comprehensive Plan update. The Council and Commission also discussed Advisory Communications and how the Council reviews them. Mayor Hovland and the City Council thanked the Commission for their work on behalf of the citizens of Edina. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 7, 2015 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1506 6/18/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 41.60 374328 1896110 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 63.20 374326 1896112 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 56.80 374327 1896516 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 37.20 374619 1897611 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 75.60 374620 1897613 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 53.60 374617 1898051 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 105.10 374618 1898058 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 115.60 374616 1898443 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 548.70 1607 6/18/2016 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 110.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 374469 137967 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 110.00 1508 6/18/2015 100638 BACHMAN'S 41.93 PLANTS 374471 110667/1 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,233.41 FLOWERS, PLANTS 00005294 374134 863414/50 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 251.44 PLANTINGS 00005294 374135 864979/50 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 763.00 MULCH 00002013 374470 869312/51 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,289.78 1509 6/18/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,977.45 374366 48571300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 703.30 374329 48571400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 260.89 374365 48571500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 159.75 374330 48573700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 113.05 374331 48573800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 36.55 374631 48677500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 676.83 374628 48677600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 205.55 374629 48677700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 517.75 374633 48677900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 186.23 374632 6551900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 141.43 374332 92131900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 137.95 374630 92171300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,116.73 1510 6/18/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 15.74- RETURN 374142 CP=WO-118798-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 77.25 EXPANDING FILES 374143 OE-396265-1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 35.60 GRAPH PAPER 374416 WO-120048-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 0177898 2501.6103 CITY OF EDINA PACS IS 374516 0177898 Council Check Register by GL CONSULTING DESIGN S118 VERNON AVE SIDEWALK Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 01411.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1510 6/18/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 01406.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 98.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 374139 WO -121268-1 7410.6513 126.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 374141 WO -121904-1 1550.6406 133.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 374140 WO -121906-1 1550.6406 194.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009416 374514 WO -122225-1 5110.6513 47.24 FOOTREST 374513 WO -122672-1 1190.6406 21.71 WRIST REST 374512 WO -122674-1 1190.6406 719.33 1511 6/18/2015 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 376.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 470.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 282.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 470.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 846.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 1,034.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 4,700.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 5,687.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 1,598.00 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 15,463.00 Subledger Account Description Continued... OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 2 Business Unit PSTF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ASSESSING ASSESSING 374516 0177898 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 374516 0177898 07118.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN S118 VERNON AVE SIDEWALK 374516 0177898 01411.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON 374516 0177898 01411.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON 374516 0177898 01406.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 374516 0177898 01406.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 374516 0177898 01413.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON 374516 0177898 01413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON 374516 0177898 450006.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 1512 6/18/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 73.97 RESERVOIR 00005382 374417 965771 73.97 1513 6/18/2015 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 368.00 MATERIALS TESTING 3,270.00 I NSPECTIONS/TESTING 3,638.00 SURFACE PRO 00004342 374150 VQ72762 1514 6/18/2015 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 17,578.64 LEGAL COUNSEL 17,578.64 2330.6406 374148 B028756 374418 B029611 1553.6530 47083.6710 47090.6710 374475 2851-OOOG99 1196.6131 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF CITY ATTORNEY 1515 6/18/2015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 1,163.47 SURFACE PRO 00004342 374150 VQ72762 2330.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 99.74 SURFACE WARRANTY 00004342 374151 VS29233 2330.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 1,263.21 1516 6/18/2015 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 811.00 CLEANERS 374477 518368 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 0 0 0 _• 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 3 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ELECTION 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 50TH ST SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No' Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1516 6/18/2015 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD Continued... 835.67 FILTERS 374476 518370 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,646.67 1517 6/18/2015 105693 CITYSPRINT 18.76 COURIER SERVICE 374478 34461 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18.76 1518 6/18/2015 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 258.00 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 374153 7070214299 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,180.00 JUNE 2015 CLEANING 374152 7070214459 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,438.00 1519 6/18/2015 104020 DALCO 472.24 WIPES, TISSUE, TOWELS 00001454 374158 2890984 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 344.68 LINERS, SCOURING PADS 00001454 374157 2892338 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 234.64 CLEANER, CUPS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00009415 374533 2893008 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1,051.56 1520 6/18/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 151.80 374337 806511 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 19.20 374338 806512 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 953.75 374372 806513 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,991.30 374339 806514 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,116.05 1521 6/18/2015 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 288.00 CARAMEL CORN 374601 2020 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 288.00 1522 6/18/2015 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 134.56 THERMAL ROLLS 374432 134453 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 134.56 1523 6/18/2015 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 85.64 PAINTING SUPPLIES 00001082 374168 03147716 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.64 1524 6/18/2015 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 5,728.08 TURNOUTS 00003610 374583 216843 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 5,728.08 _• 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 3 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ELECTION 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 50TH ST SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1524 6/18/2015 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. Continued... 1525 6/18/2015 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 157.52 TOILET RENTAL 374481 88996 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 157.52 1526 6/18/2015 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES 218.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 374170 2239 05539.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON 218.00 1627 6/18/2015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,522.74 374656 197235 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,522.74 1528 6/18/2015 101483 MENARDS 146.71 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL 00001104 374177 87172 5937.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 37.02 KNEE CUSHIONS, GLOVES 00006433 374483 87461 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 59.68 STATION 2 REPAIRS 00001130 374592 87648 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 30.40 CONDUIT 00001132 374176 87653 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 72.90 CONCRETE MIX 00001141 374178 87739 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3.97 WALL BASE ADHESIVE 00001146 374179 87841 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 649.99 FIRE SAFE 00005123 374691 88191 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,000.67 1529 6/18/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 22,655.00 TORO GREENSMASTER 00006393 374487 1001163-00 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 4,500.00 UTILITY VEHICLE 00002389 374443 1012656-00 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 72.89 SWITCH 00006347 374488 1013475-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 14.61 GROMMET 00006347 374489 1013475-01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 112.75 SPACERS, PLATES 00006348 374490 1013957-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 60.57 VALVE, SHIMS 00006348 374491 1013957-01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 256.99 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS 374492 1016598-00 5765.6530 REPAIR PARTS PROMENADE EXPENSES 27,672.81 1530 6/18/2015 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 6,188.00 TRIPLE SLIDE REPLACEMENT 374611 2556 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 6,188.00 1531 6/18/2016 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 653.30 REMOVED PROPANE LINES 374494 62584 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 653.30 is 0 40 0 • i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 -- 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1531 6/18/2015 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. Continued... 1532 6/18/2015 129485 PAPCO INC. 195.00 CAN LINERS, TOWELS 374186 93009 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 195.00 1533 6/18/2015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 735.92 TIRES 00005279 374448 210173688 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,398.38 SERVICE CALL, TIRES 00005279 374188 210173700 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,134.30 1534 6/18/2015 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 9,402.40 ZAMBONI BATTERIES 374497 0057002 -IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 9,402.40 1535 6/18/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 98.50 BUSINESS CARDS 374451 86533 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 98.50 1536 6/18/2015 104672 SPRINT 33.14 374458 -150 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.52 374458 -150 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 49.07 374458 -150 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 80.25 374458 -150 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 99.42 374458 -150 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.68 374458 -150 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 184.95 374458 -150 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 239.94 374458 -150 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 291.19 374458 -150 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 317.61 374458 -150 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 21.57 374458 -150 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 16.57 374458 -150 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 459.90 374458 -150 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.57 374458 -150 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 33.14 374457 873184124 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.51 374457 873184124 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 49.05 374457 873184124 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 78.72 374457 873184124 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 99.30 374457 873184124 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.68 374457 873184124 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 184.95 374457 873184124 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1636 6/18/2015 104672 SPRINT Continued... 239.94 374457 873184124 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 294.19 374457 873184124 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 316.61 374457 873184124 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 21.55 374457 873184124 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 16.55 374457 673184124 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 453.72 374457 673184124 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.75 374457 873184124 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 3,939.04 1537 6/18/2016 101004 SPS COMPANIES 83.48 MAL GAL CAPS, PARTS 00001579 374193 53050679.001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 83.48 1538 6/18/2015 101015 STREICHERS 209.00 AMMUNITION 374194 11154216 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 209.00 1539 6/18/2015 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 1,245.09 FERTILIZER 374504 8411-R 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,245.09 1540 6/18/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 214.40 FUEL TUBES, VALVES, PIPE 00005328 374198 E188643 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.70 EXTENSIONS 00006342 374507 E188962 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 249.10 1541 6/18/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 595.50 374403 0125860 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 182.75 374402 0126349 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 778.25 1542 6/18/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 906.15 374405 395633-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 868.18 374404 395637-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,774.33 394480 6/18/2016 135278 AAS, ANN 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 374275 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 is 0 40 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page- 7 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING SNOW & ICE REMOVAL STREET RENOVATION SNOW & ICE REMOVAL STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT, GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL POOL CONCESSIONS • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394481 6118/2015 105075 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. Continued... 694.99 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00002008 374468 34240 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 694.99 394482 6/18/2015 129458 ACME'TOOLS 396.84 TOOLS 374227 3302462 1318.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 396.98 DEWALT CORDLESS HAMMER 00001907 374229 3338229 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 736.44 YARD BROOM 374228 3338232 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 236.88 RAKES 374231 3350799 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,026.16 TAMPER FOR HOT MIX 374232 3350819 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 263.24 TOOLS, PARTS 374230 3350869 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 372.19 HITCH, PINTLE/BALL 374233 3400300 1301.6556 TOOLS 4,428.73 394483 6/18/2015 132835 ADCOCK, MARIAN 12.32 ART WORK SOLD 374276 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 12.32 394484 6/18/2015 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 10.40 ART WORK SOLD 374277 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 10.40 394485 6/18/2015 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 226.88 374414 053115 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 316.42 374414 053115 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 512.88 374414 053115 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 97.67 374414 053115 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 141.21 374414 053115 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 216.38 374414 053115 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 1,511.44 394486 6/18/2015 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,124.25 ANTENNAS 00003611 374578 53375 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,124.25 394487 6/18/2015 136499 ANDERSON, ANDREA 95.00 PROGRAM REFUND 374218 CANCELATION 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 95.00 394488 6/18/2015 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 2,289.32 CONCESSION PRODUCT 374596 505270575 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 40 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page- 7 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING SNOW & ICE REMOVAL STREET RENOVATION SNOW & ICE REMOVAL STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE DEPT, GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 -- 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394488 6/18/2015 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE Continued... 1,220.95 CONCESSION PRODUCT 374597 506050507 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 3,510.27 394489 6/18/2015 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 144.45 MONITORING SERVICE 374129 187776 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.30 MONITORING SERVICE 374130 187777 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.75 394490 6/18/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 288.00 374362 3036784 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 160.00 374623 3036785 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,049.00 374621 3036786 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,372.45 374622 3036787 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 986.75 374363 3036788 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 64.00 374624 3036873 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7.00- 374364 315664 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 270.00- 374625 316641 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,643.20 394491 6/18/2015 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 273.75 1-146354 374131 060115 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 273.75 394492 6/18/2015 100266 AT&T MOBILITY 69.98 PD DATA CARD 374132 2872576828 1400.6160 DATAPROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.98 394493 6/18/2015 120995 AVR INC. 1,019.50 READY MIX 374133 110065 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,019.50 394494 6/18/2015 121083 BARR, FRANK 55.25 ART WORK SOLD 374278 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.25 394496 6/18/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 24.99 BATTERIES 00001796 374136 018-369083 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 95.78 BATTERIES 374137 018-373639 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 120.77 40 is 40 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 — 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394496 6/18/2015 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. Continued... 4,651.10 BATTERIES 00006338 374472 9839STC 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 4,651.10 394497 6/18/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 396.00 374626 2111 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,254.00 374627 2112 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,650.00 394498 6/18/2015 130251 BEARDEN, JAMES 6,375.00 SCULPTURE 374579 2015 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 6,375.00 394499 6118/2015 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 61.10 ART WORK SOLD 374279 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.10 394500 6/18/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 432.00 PIZZA 374598 D2813432 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 216.00 PIZZA 374473 D2813449 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 648.00 394501 6/18/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 40.00 374367 224334 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 456.15 374368 224335 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 286.09 374369 224336 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 230.60 374370 224337 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,012.84 394502 6/18/2015 136548 BERNIE M PHOTOGRAPHY 400.00 GOGGLE PHOTO SHOOT 374415 41069 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 400.00 394503 6/18/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 93.55 COFFEE 374138 T80446 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 93.55 394504 6/18/2015 122599 BIOLAWN 190.00 GRUB CONTROL 374234 86002 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 190.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 -- 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394505 6/18/2015 103866 BLALOCK, KAREN Continued... 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 374280 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 394506 6/18/2015 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 861.39 ART SUPPLIES 00009414 374515 4556761 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 861.39 394507 6/18/2015 134697 BLOOMINGTON ELECTRIC COMPANY 19,395.00 PARKING STRUCTURE LIGHTING 374235 P-23 #3 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 19, 395.00 394508 6/18/2015 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 832.23 WIRE FOR UNDERGROUND 00001094 374145 909396405 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 124.04 TRAILER PLUG 00001091 374146 909406781 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 60.43 J -BOXES 00001119 374147 909430021 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,016.70 394509 6/18/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 391.45 374634 127058 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 965.50 374635 127094 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,356.95 394510 6/18/2015 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 13.71 374474 061115 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 35.00 374474 061115 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 91.71 374474 061115 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 193.00 374474 061115 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 333.42 394511 6/18/2015 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 624.46 TEMPERED INSULATED GLASS 374149 528509S 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 624.46 394512 6/18/2015 104301 BRIO BRASS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/29/15 374361 060115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 394513 6/18/2016 136498 BULLER, HEATHER 69.00 PROGRAM REFUND 374219 CANCELATION 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 PARKADMIN. GENERAL 69.00 is 0 0 0 • s R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394513 6/18/2015 136498 BULLER, HEATHER Continued... 394514 6/18/2015 136558 BURNS, JILL 105.00 CLASS REFUND 374517 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 105.00 394515 6/18/2015 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 844.80 GOLF CLUBS 374519 926042558 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 97.68 GOLF CLUB 374520 926047156 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 14.08 GRIPS 374518 926051408 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 164.34 HYBRID CLUB 374521 926056464 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,120.90 394516 6/18/2015 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 374281 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.75 394517 6/18/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 18.55 374334 00010947 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 626.50 374333 604002 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8,332.05 374335 604853 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,977.10 394518 6/18/2015 130252 CARTER, JOEL 9.72 ART WORK SOLD 374282 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.72 394519 6/18/2015 134978 CATHERWOOD, JILL 98.80 ART WORK SOLD 374283 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 98.80 394520 6/18/2015 129923 CAWLEY 54.68 NAME BADGES 374522 V297771 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 54.68 394521 6/18/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 60.19 374580 0146-5/15 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 169.74 374580 0146-5/15 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 171.30 374580 0146-5/15 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 313.12 374580 0146-5/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 57.56 374580 0146-5/15 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394521 6/18/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 296.50 374580 0146-5/15 5911.6188 TELEPHONE 37.69 374580 0146-5/15 5932.6188 TELEPHONE 590.03 612 E01-0426 374424 0426-6/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 87.45 952 941-1019 374237 1019-5/15 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 59.38 952 835-1161 374422 1161-6/15 5720.6188 TELEPHONE 59.14 952941-1410 374238 1410-5/15 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 207.67 952 835-6661 374421 6661-6/15 1552.6188 TELEPHONE 590.03 612 E12-6797 374423 6797-6/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 110.67 952 826-7398 374236 7398-5/15 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,810.47 394522 6/18/2015 136503 CHAPDELAINE, TIMOTHY 45.00 SIGNED UP FOR PROGRAM TWICE 374220 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND 45.00 394523 6/18/2015 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 1,561.87 00077479-0113317143 374599 0113317143-6/15 5720.6189 SEWER & WATER 54.58 00110793-0155250009 374527 0155250009-6/15 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER 105.97 00110793-0155250018 374528 0155250018-6/15 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER 382.09 00079303-0155300018 374525 0155300018-6/15 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 232.64 00113607-0170005201 374561 0170005201-6/15 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER 54.58 00110793-0173001000 374529 0173001000-6/15 5424.6189 SEWER & WATER 87.54 00110793-0173001001 374526 0173001001-6/15 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER 91.89 00102561-0112920000 374419 112920000-6/15 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER 3,971.78 00110793-0155200000 374530 155200000-6/15 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER 78.70 00079303-0155300009 374523 155300009-6/15 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 995.83 00079303-0155300010 374524 155300010-6/15 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER 7,617.47 394524 6/18/2015 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 375.36 374371 0138025213 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 181.36 374336 0188154806 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 556.72 394525 6/18/2015 120433 COMCAST 28.94 8772 10 614 0220686 374600 220686-6/15 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 24.78 8772 10 614 0023973 374531 23973-6/15 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 53.72 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page- 12 Business Unit WELL PUMPS GENERAL STORM SEWER CENT SERV GEN - MIS PSTF OCCUPANCY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS SKATING & HOCKEY CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SERV GEN - MIS PSTF ADMINISTRATION PARKADMIN. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RANGE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK OCCUPANCY CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL 394526 6/18/2015 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 0 0 0 0 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 13 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PSTF OCCUPANCY 711.59 POLOS 374532 93054679 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 711.59 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 6/18/2015 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. CITY OF EDINA 2,834.00 Council Check Register by GL 374156 12820 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary. 394631 6/18/2015 — 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394526 6118/2015 374285 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD Continued... 227.50 11,192.98 HOT MIX 374420 053115 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 394632 6/18/2016 11,192.98 120327 DELUXE 394627 6/18/2015 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES DEPOSIT SLIPS 374425 2034195246 5821.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,374.34 UNIFORMS 374154 37348 5761.6201 LAUNDRY 1,374.34 394533 6/18/2015 118189 DEM -CON COMPANIES 394528 6/18/2015 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 1,044.23 GARBAGE DISPOSAL 374426 88.28 114-09855685-4 374155 053115 7411.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,044.23 88.28 394634 394529 6/18/2015 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 0 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 13 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PSTF OCCUPANCY 711.59 POLOS 374532 93054679 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES FIELD MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ICE ARENA REVENUES 711.59 394530 6/18/2015 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. 2,834.00 FIELD CHALK, CLAY 374156 12820 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 2,834.00 394631 6118/2015 124357 DELANEY, ALICE 227.50 ART WORK SOLD 374285 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 227.50 394632 6/18/2016 120327 DELUXE 83.51 DEPOSIT SLIPS 374425 2034195246 5821.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 83.51 394533 6/18/2015 118189 DEM -CON COMPANIES 1,044.23 GARBAGE DISPOSAL 374426 8641 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 1,044.23 394634 6/18/2015 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 201.83 YELLOW PAGE ADS 374427 651972955-5/15 5761.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 201.83 394535 6/18/2015 136666 DOUGHERTY, CHRISTOPHER 93.00 CLASS REFUND 374534 SKATING 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 93.00 394636 6/18/2015 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. FIELD MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ICE ARENA REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394536 6/18/2015 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. Continued... 1,029.25 APPAREL 374536 539329 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 178.00 SHIRTS 374535 539357 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,207.25 394537 6/18/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 1,373.91 PUBLISH ORD 2015-07 374159 225432 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 217.82 PUBLISH ORD 2015-7 PG 2 374160 225433 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 921.80 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 374428 226634 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 921.81 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 374428 226634 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 921.81 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 374428 226634 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 4,357.15 394538 6/18/2016 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 788.00 STREET LIGHTING FUSES 00001949 374161 11924700 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 788.00 394539 6/18/2015 116698 EGRESS WINDOW GUY INC. 76.60 PERMIT REFUND 374537 ED137126 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 76.60 394540 6/18/2015 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS 16.27 MAY 2015 MGMT FEE 374582 053115 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 16.27 394541 6/18/2016 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 8,974.37 SQUAD BUILD UPS 374162 RS4236 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 8,974.37 394542 6/18/2015 135208 ESCAPE FIRE 325.00 SPRINKLER HEAD REPAIRS 374239 15105 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 325.00 394543 6/18/2015 136494 ETTINGER, MARK 90.00 SPRINKLER HEAD ADJUSTMENT 374240 REIMBURSE 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 90.00 394544 6/18/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 132.52 BATTERIES 00005300 374244 1-Z04579 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 192.30 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, BRAKE KITS 374243 6-1407356 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.42 ROTORASSEMBLIES 374242 69-180759 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394544 6/18/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 56.04 POWER STEERING FLUID 374241 69-180938 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.94 SPARK PLUGS, FILTER, V -BELTS 374429 69-181041 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.44 TRANSMISSION FLUID 374430 69-181060 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 599.66 394545 6/18/2015 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 24.48 DRILL BITS 00002150 374602 MNTC2130834 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 24.48 394546 6/18/2015 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 147.50 MAGNETIC SIGNS, PRICING 374603 190-69007 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS 147.50 394547 6/18/2015 100756 FEDEX 24.34 SHIPPING CHARGE 374538 5-057-23147 1130.6235 POSTAGE COMMUNICATIONS 24.34 394548 6/18/2015 133257 FILBIN, SUZANNE 33.15 ART WORK SOLD 374284 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 33.15 394549 6/18/2015 108654 FLANDERS, SUSAN 31.20 ART WORK SOLD 374286 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.20 394550 6/18/2015 123818 FLEURY, CYNTHIA 81.25 ART WORK SOLD 374289 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 81.25 394551 6/18/2015 136496 FONTANA, JOSIE 45.00 PROGRAM REFUND 374221 060515 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL 45.00 394552 6/18/2015 136556 FOSS EXTERIORS LLC 312.49 PERMIT REFUND 374539 ED139481 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 312.49 394553 6/18/2015 136515 FOSTER, MARY 55.25 ART WORK SOLD 374287 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 55.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 394553 6/18/2015 136616 FOSTER, MARY 394554 6/18/2015 100919 FREY, MICHAEL 11.95 13.94 35.72 94.15 1m a7 394665 6/18/2015 106372 FRONT AVENUE POTTERY & TILE . 24.70 ART WORK SOLD 374288 060815 5101.4413 24.70 394556 6/18/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 3.53 CITY OF EDINA 374431 1108799-5/15 Council Check Register by GL 84.88 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1108799-5/15 1646.6201 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 ACCT 1108799 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 178.84 ACCT 1108799 Continued... 374540 061215 5110.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 374540 061215 5125.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 374540 061215 5120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 374540 061215 5111.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 374540 061215 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 374540 061215 5110.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 394665 6/18/2015 106372 FRONT AVENUE POTTERY & TILE . 24.70 ART WORK SOLD 374288 060815 5101.4413 24.70 394556 6/18/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 3.53 ACCT 1108799 374431 1108799-5/15 1646.6201 84.88 ACCT 1108799 374431 1108799-5/15 1646.6201 118.00 ACCT 1108799 374431 1108799-5/15 1552.6511 178.84 ACCT 1108799 374431 1108799-5/15 1553.6201 196.08 ACCT 1108799 374431 1108799-5/15 1301.6201 27.55 ACCT 1108799 374431 1108799-5/15 5511.6201 111.80 ACCT 1108799 374431 1108799-5/15 5913.6201 5421.6201 5913.6103 1644.6541 1130.6103 5701.4541 is ART WORK SOLD LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANTINGS & TREES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALADMISSIONS 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 16 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION GRILL DISTRIBUTION TREES & MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 0 720.68 394557 6/18/2016 100764 G & K SERVICES 95.58 ACCT 0039263 LINENS 374479 1013135455 95.58 394558 6/18/2015 103185 GERTENS 1,019.97 TREES 00001153 374163 353384/1 120.00 FLOWERS 00001154 374541 354183/1 1,139.97 394559 6/18/2016 128266 GILMOUR, CHAD 350.00 UPDATING GRAPHICS FOR VIDEO 374542 1025 350.00 394560 6/18/2015 136563 GLENCOE SILVER LAKE PUBLIC SHCOOL 25.00 OVERPAYMENT TO EDINBOROUGH 374543 REFUND 25.00 5421.6201 5913.6103 1644.6541 1130.6103 5701.4541 is ART WORK SOLD LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANTINGS & TREES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALADMISSIONS 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 16 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION GRILL DISTRIBUTION TREES & MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 0 • 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page- 17 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL ART CENTER REVENUES STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION PARKADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394560 6/18/2015 136553 GLENCOE SILVER LAKE PUBLIC SHCOOL Continued... 394561 6/18/2015 101178 GOPHER 93.54 HULAHOOPS 00002195 374604 8946461 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 93.54 394562 6/18/2015 101103 GRAINGER 275.01 GLOVES, TOOLS 00006292 374480 9745995978 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 127.92 FACESHIELDS 00001143 374544 9759213623 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 402.93 394563 6/18/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,264.50 374375 182813 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,264.50 374373 182814 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,356.75 374374 182815 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,885.75 394564 6/18/2015 136517 GRAY, SUSANNA 180.70 ART WORK SOLD 374290 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 180.70 394665 6/18/2015 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 72.19 IRRIGATION REPAIR 374164 151126 1318.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 72.19 394566 6118/2015 100155 GRITTON, KAY 35.10 ART WORK SOLD 374291 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 35.10 394567 6/18/2015 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 181.05 SHEAVES, FILTER ELEMENT, BLADE 374165 143278 1314.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 493.63 BATTERY, BELTS, GASKETS 374245 143279 1314.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 210.64 2 -BAG CHUTE, ARM, BLADES 374545 143614 1314.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 490.00 48C HP POWER FLOW 374546 143616 1314.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 445.00 BAGGER LX 374547 143618 1314.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,820.32 394568 6/18/2016 134068 GUDMUNDSON, LYNNAE 69.00 PROGRAM REFUND 374222 CANCELATION 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 69.00 • 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page- 17 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL ART CENTER REVENUES STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION PARKADMIN. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 — 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394569 6/18/2015 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. Continued... 487.80 374548 053115 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 336.00 374548 053115 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION 411.00 374548 053115 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 216.00 374548 053115 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 920.49 374548 053115 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 2,371.29 394570 6/18/2016 100790 HACH COMPANY 68.94 REAGENT 00001035 374166 9400514 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 68.94 394571 6/18/2015 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 55.45 J -BOX 00001118 374549 143168-1 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 55.45 394572 6/18/2016 136451 HANNAN, JESS 50.00 CLASS REFUND 374550 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 50.00 394573 6/18/2015 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 2,935.68 GATE VALVE, COUPLINGS 00001106 374167 D991824 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 357.64 WATER MAIN PARTS 00001200 374433 D998564 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 415.66- CREDIT 374434 E013703 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 2,877.66 394674 6/18/2015 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 1,025.13 JULY 2015 COBRA 374436 59442538 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 12,540.70 JULY 2015 PREMIUMS 374435 59446181 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 13,565.83 394575 6/18/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 410.82 AUTOMARK / COURIER 374246 052015 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 2,691.00 BALLOTS 374246 052015 1180.6575 PRINTING ELECTION 3,101.82 394576 6/18/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 32,991.00 SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 374247 1000061376 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 32,991.00 394577 6/18/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 0 0 0 374340 766719 374377 767038 394582 • 124698 HOYE, PAMELA • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 374292 060815 CITY OF EDINA 7.31 6/16/2015 9:47:55 394583 6/18/2015 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 238.82 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary BROECKEL 6/18/2015 — 6/18/2015 238.82 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394577 6/18/2015 176.26 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 374607 RSF180 Continued... 176.26 165.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 374437 1000061319 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 165.00 619.57 PARTS 374249 053115 394578 6/18/2015 619.57 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 394686 6/18/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 19.00 SPEAKER BAR 00004345 374438 55966067 2310.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES E911 19.00 394579 6/18/2015 136551 HEYNE, RICHARD 292.31 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 374551 061115 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 292.31 394580 6/18/2015 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 599.90 TENNANT REPAIRS 00002214 374605 700187087 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 14.40- CREDIT 00002207 374606 800191558 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 585.50 394581 6/18/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,657.00 374376 766698 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 374340 766719 374377 767038 394582 6/18/2015 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 7.31 ART WORK SOLD 374292 060815 7.31 394583 6/18/2015 136501 HUMANA 238.82 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 374248 BERNELL BROECKEL 238.82 394584 6/18/2015 129430 HYDROTECH SYSTEMS LTD 176.26 ANODE 00002150 374607 RSF180 176.26 394585 6/18/2015 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 619.57 PARTS 374249 053115 619.57 394686 6/18/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FLOWRIDER 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 394586 6/18/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 855.00 855.00 394587 6/18/2015 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 34.15 56.29 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No 374378 29838 5842.5514 374250 053115 1628.6406 374250 053115 1400.6406 374250 053115 1470.6106 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 20 Business Unit YORK SELLING SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.91 394588 6/18/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5,003.00 374360 2368055 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 134.40 374341 2368121 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,716.00 374379 2368136 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,062.60 374380 2368137 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8,514.47 374637 2368145 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 584.00 374636 2380090 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 23,014.47 394589 6/18/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 851.12 374382 5177579 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 211.02 374383 5177587 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 627.62 374381 5179127 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 871.42 374654 5183250 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 51.16 374653 5183251 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 66.82 374652 5183252 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 214.08 374646 5183253 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,020.91 374642 5183254 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 434.36 374651 5183255 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,832.09 374384 5183256 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 544.14 374655 5183257 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,965.92 374645 5183260 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,166.74 374640 5183261 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.41 374641 5183262 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,863.58 374643 5183263 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 586.20 374639 5183264 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,126.31 374644 5183265 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 426.43 374638 5183266 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,298.60 374647 5183267 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 162.08 374385 5183268 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,240.09 374649 5183269 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 0 0 0 0 • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394589 6/18/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,795.04 374386 5183270 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 756.28 374648 5183271 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 634.35 374387 5183272 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 48.00 374650 5183617 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 17.33- 374388 527366 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30,808.44 394590 6/18/2015 135282 JOHNSON, CAROL RAJALA 87.75 ART WORK SOLD 374293 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 87.75 394591 6/18/2015 136260 JOY PECCHIA INTERNATIONAL INC. 1,250.00 BALANCE DUE 374439 04172015KK 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 1,250.00 394592 6/18/2015 136260 JOY PECCHIA INTERNATIONAL INC. 135.00 COACHING/CONSULTING 374584 061215SN 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 135.00 394593 6/18/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 290.69 UNIFORMS 00003556 374585 268647-05 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 335.92 00003603 374586 277821 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 00003608 374587 278119 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 60.00 00003608 374588 278119-90 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ' 70.00 00003608 374591 278763 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 199.96 00003603 374590 278828 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 167.96 00003609 374589 278836 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,194.53 394594 6/18/2015 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 136.38 KEYS CORED 00006422 374482 SI019683 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 136.38 394595 6/18/2015 124348 KILBANE, CHRIS 21.13 ART WORK SOLD 374294 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 21.13 394596 6/18/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 3,347.50 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 374169 6699805 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKI NG&WAYFI N DING 3,347.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394596 6/18/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. Continued... 394597 6/18/2015 123188 KLEINBERGER, CAROLYN 178.75 ART WORK SOLD 374295 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 178.75 394598 6/18/2015 136560 KONEZNY, SUSAN 110.00 CLASS REFUND 374552 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 110.00 394599 6/18/2016 134675 KOSKINEN, MATTHEW 101.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 374690 061515 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 50.00 VIDEO CAMERA RENTAL 374553 201503 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 151.20 394600 6/18/2015 130215 KUEHL, RHONDA 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 374296 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 394601 6/18/2015 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 33.25- 374254 SCR356716 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 2,116.51 UNIFORMS 374251 SIN2814533 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 42.75 374252 SIN2835253 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 33.25 374253 SIN2848943 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 912.66 374255 SIN2864198 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 19.00 UNIFORM 374608 SIN2886833 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,090.92 394602 6/18/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 335.69 HEX CAPS, SCREWS, WASHERS 00001999 374171 9303300337 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 148.76 BAND SAW BLADE 00005375 374172 9303320163 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 484.45 394603 6/18/2015 122801 LOVAAS, JULIE 69.00 PROGRAM REFUND 374223 CANCELATION 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 PARKADMIN. GENERAL 69.00 394604 6/18/2015 136667 LU, CHENFENG 120.00 CLASS REFUND 374554 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 120.00 is • • • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394605 6/18/2015 134612 MAJICA, SERGIO Continued... 150.00 FARMER'S MARKET 6/25/15 374312 060115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 394606 6/18/2015 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 18,628.18 UNLEADED FUEL 00005344 374175 521824 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11,350.04 DIESEL FUEL 00005342 374174 526792 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 800.76 UNLEADED FUEL 00005342 374173 526802 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30,778.98 394607 6/18/2015 101987 MENARDS 202.89 LUMBER 374484 69420 5761.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 209.10 BELT SANDER, PLYWOOD 374485 69495 5761.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 80.37 3-DRAWER UNIT, MORTAR HOE 00002221 374609 70014 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 492.36 394608 6/18/2016 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 9,840.60 APR 2015 SAC 374486 061215 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 9,840.60 394609 6/18/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER 929.98 SPARE UPS 374257 5598975 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 799.99 UPS FOR 50TH LIQ 374257 5598975 5821.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,195.95 UPS AND USB DRIVES 374256 5604044 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,925.92 394610 6/18/2015 136514 MILLER THOMPSON, SHARON 140.40 ART WORK SOLD 374297 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 140.40 394611 6/18/2015 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 450.00 HAND SOAP 00001098 374180 SOI-036706 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 450.00 HAND SOAP 00001096 374180 SOI-036706 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 900.00 394612 6/18/2015 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 35.91 CO2, METHAIR 374181 171128696 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 35.91 394613 6/18/2015 127062 MINN EHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.36 WINDOW WASHING 374440 928039446 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394613 6/18/2015 127062 MINN EHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. Continued... 5.36 394614 6/18/2015 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 374441 LIC50026 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 35.00 394615 6/18/2015 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 99.00 AD IN MN PARENT MAGAZINE 374610 159124 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 70.00 LIQUOR INSERTS FOR SW 374442 159418 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 70.00 LIQUOR INSERTS FOR SW 374442 159418 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 70.00 LIQUOR INSERTS FOR SW 374442 159418 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 309.00 394616 6/18/2015 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 34.80 BOLTS FOR MOWER 00001052 374182 0110128 -IN 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 34.80 394617 6/18/2015 124121 MULLANEY, MARLA 7.70 ART WORK SOLD 374298 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 7.70 394618 6/18/2015 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 24.30 PARTS 374493 053115 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.88 PARTS 374493 053115 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 287.22 PARTS 374493 053115 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 452.40 394619 6/18/2015 132644 NELSON LINDALL, ALICE 91.00 ART WORK SOLD 374300 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 91.00 394620 6/18/2015 136518 NELSON, JUDY 61.10 ART WORK SOLD 374299 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.10 394621 6/18/2015 121126 NEMER, KAREN 8.94 ARTWORK SOLD 374301 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 8.94 394622 6/18/2016 131649 NEOPOST GREAT PLAINS is 0 0 • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 394622 6/18/2015 • CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 -- 6/18/2015 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 131649 NEOPOST GREAT PLAINS 238.00 POSTAGE MACHINE INK CARTRIDGE 374444 GPAR38349 1550.6235 238.00 394623 6/18/2015 130988 NEUENDORF, BILL 102.35 72.45 24.15 996.86 175.00 177.53 58.50 REIMBURSEMENT 66.40 REIMBURSEMENT 127.00 REIMBURSEMENT 13.75 27.60 62.18 40.49 301.69 1,104.74 24.95 29.00 675.00 72.20 4,151.84 394624 6/18/2016 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 292.50 394625 6/18/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC. 40.86 SHORTS 625.17 UNIFORM SHIRTS 365.76 STAFF SHIRTS 1,031.79 374321 022715 374322 041615 374323 060315 374323 060315 374319 091814 374319 091814 374317 2013 374317 2013 374317 2013 374318 2014 374318 2014 374318 2014 374318 2014 374318 2014 374324 6/3/15 374324 6/3/15 374324 6/3/15 374325 IEDC 374320 JAN2014 374389 100669 374556 971766452 374445 972047675 374555 972279602 394626 6/18/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 381.00 LAMPS FOR ORNAMENTAL LIGHTS 00001151 374557 89706 381.00 394627 6/18/2015 136492 NORSTOG, SOLVEIG 9232.6107 9232.6107 9232.6107 9232.6104 9232.6104 9232.6107 9232.6406 9232.6107 9232.6104 9232.6107 9232.6104 9232.6406 9234.6106 9234.6406 1500.6106 9232.6107 9234.6106 9232.6104 9232.6107 5842.5513 5440.5511 5761.6201 5410.6406 1322.6406 Subledger Account Description Continued... POSTAGE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING EXPENSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE • 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 25 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT CONTINGENCIES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING GOLF ADMINISTRATION STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 — 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394627 6/18/2015 136492 NORSTOG, SOLVEIG Continued... 1.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 374258 060915 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1.00 394628 6/18/2016 136562 NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC 167.50 PARTS FOR PLAYGROUND SWINGS 374558 345 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 167.50 394629 6/18/2015 131662 NOVAK, BERNADINE 7.15 ART WORK SOLD 374303 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 7.15 394630 6/18/2015 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 8,000.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 374183 SMPSB#3 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,000.00 394631 6/18/2016 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 13.65 ART WORK SOLD 374304 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 13.65 394632 6/18/2015 123786 OLSON, VICKI 76.70 ART WORK SOLD 374302 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 76.70 394633 6/18/2016 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 120.00 WINDOWTINTING 374185 272144 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 120.00 WINDOWTINTING 374184 272145 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 240.00 394634 6/18/2015 136493 PAC PROPERTIES LLC 2,742.44 SPRINKLER REPAIRS 374259 INV0218411 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2,742.44 394635 6/18/2015 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 88.40 ART WORK SOLD 374305 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 88.40 394636 6/18/2015 102440 PASS, GRACE 117.00 ART WORK SOLD 374306 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 117.00 is • 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 26 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES PSTF ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES G • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394637 6/18/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 93.95- 374344 8501478 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,939.89 374390 8502235 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 335.60 374342 8502239 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 950.13 374343 8502241 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 115.25 374391 8502284 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,246.92 394638 6/18/2015 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 595.00 IT CONSULTING 374446 60615002 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 595.00 394639 6/18/2015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 434.30 374345 38446676 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,152.94 374612 46043751 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 290.73 374657 46043891 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,877.97 394640 6118/2015 124239 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC. 60.00 JV PEP BILLING - MAY 2015 374187 14036 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.00 394641 6/18/2015 136561 PETERSON, DEBI 110.00 CLASS REFUND 374559 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 110.00 394642 6/18/2015 136552 PETERSON, KATHY 35.00 GARDEN PLOT 32 374560 REFUND 1600.4390.57 COMMUNITY GARDEN PARKADMIN. GENERAL 35.00 394643 6/18/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 19.34- 374672 214320 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.67- 374673 214321 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.96- 374674 214322 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.32 374667 2802001 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 25.74 374665 2802002 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .20 374393 2802003 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .58 374660 2802004 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 123.48 374658 2802006 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 317.65 374669 2802007 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,110.62 374668 2802009 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 6/18/2015 CITY OF EDINA 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 92.11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 52098558.001 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 92.11 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394643 6/18/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT Continued... 1,748.04 374664 2802010 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,402.67 374666 2802011 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 219.48 374663 2802012 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,508.85 374661 2802013 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 228.64 374662 2802014 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 560.77 374392 2802015 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,338.13 374659 2802016 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 208.00 374670 2802241 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 176.00 374671 2802242 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 394644 6/18/2015 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 92.11 HYDRAULIC HOSE 00006350 374495 52098558.001 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 92.11 394645 6/18/2015 100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 2,499.94 REBUILD KITS 00001101 374447 0065107 -IN 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,499.94 394646 6/18/2016 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 374449 061115 1628.6235 POSTAGE 350.00 394647 6/18/2016 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 146.64 BIKE RACK POSTCARDS 374561 POSTAGE 2501.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 146.64 394648 6/18/2015 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 950.00 GPS UNITS 374450 IN200-1005326 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,180.81 GPS UNITS 374562 IN200-1005412 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 3,130.81 394649 6/18/2015 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 72.50 WATER 374613 622833-5/15 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.50 394660 6/18/2016 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 228.00 BLADE SHARPENING 374496 274209 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 228.00 is • MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION SENIOR CITIZENS PACS IS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL STREET RENOVATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ARENA ICE MAINT 0 r • i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 — 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394651 6/18/2015 125936 REINDERS INC. Continued... 1,208.68 FUNGICIDE 374498 3031535-00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,349.00 FUNGICIDE, FERTILIZER 374499 3032015-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 120.00 FERTILIZER 00002010 374500 3032015-01 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,677.68 394652 6/18/2015 136554 RIGHINI, NICOLE 186.00 CLASS REFUND 374563 SKATING 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES 186.00 394653 6/18/2015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 906.00 SOFTENER SALT 374501 00316639 5511.6405 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 906.00 394654 6/18/2015 136504 ROKKE, SUSIE 74.00 PROGRAM REFUND 374224 CANCELATION 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 PARKADMIN. GENERAL 74.00 394655 6/18/2015 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 44.26 KNOBS 00005403 374452 16762 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118.74 DOOR LATCHES, WINDOW SWITCH 00005407 374453 16763 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 163.00 394656 6/18/2016 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 29.84 """ `••. ""'•'9 350 374454 COPY PAPER 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 29.84 394667 6/18/2016 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 18.20 AR WORK SOLD 374307 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 18.20 394658 6/18/2015 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 HARD SURFACE FLOOR CLEANING 374190 51409 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,465.00 HARD SURFACE FLOOR CLEANING 374189 51410 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 4,115.00 394659 6/18/2016 132567 SHANE, SHEILA 71.00 ART CLASS REFUND 374274 16780 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 71.00 394660 6/18/2015 103249 SHANNON, JIM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394660 6118/2015 103249 SHANNON, JIM Continued... 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/30/15 374316 060115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 394661 6/18/2015 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 115.05 ART WORK SOLD 374309 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 95.18 REMIBURSEMENT 374564 061215. 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 210.23 394662 6/18/2015 134070 SHAW, MARY JANE 69.00 CLASS REFUND 374577 GOLF 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 69.00 394663 6/18/2015 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 72.79 PAINT 00001083 374455 2798-3 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 72.79 394664 6/18/2015 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 622.00 BACKUP SOFTWARE 374191 B03500541 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 65.00 BACKUP SOFTWARE MAINT 374192 B03500548 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 687.00 394665 6/18/2015 136497 SHI, YIMING 69.00 PROGRAM REFUND 374225 CANCELATION 1600.4390.03 FAB 4 & 5 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 69.00 394666 6/18/2015 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 59.12 ART WORK SOLD 374308 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 59.12 394667 6/18/2015 120784 SIGN PRO 64.37 SIGN 374502 8847 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 64.37 394668 6/18/2015 105664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 537.70 STATION 1 MONITORING 374593 77827626 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 537.70 394669 6/18/2015 136659 SMITH, ELISABETH 105.00 CLASS REFUND 374565 GOLF 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 105.00 394672 • 110977 SOW, ADAMA ! 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 060815 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 394673 6/18/2016 103658 ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/28/15 374314 060115 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 75.00 394674 6/18/2015 6/18/2015 — 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394669 6/18/2015 136559 SMITH, ELISABETH 6/18/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 394670 6/18/2015 121.75 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 374677 5548 121.75 237.14 POWER DRIVER 00005320 374456 ARV/25883054 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 237.14 ART WORK SOLD 374311 060815 6.83 394671 6/18/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 6/18/2015 136602 STEINBAUER, JENNIFER 104.00- SWITCHED TENNIS SESSIONS 374347 0017237 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.50 374348 1268719 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 354.35 374398 1293671 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,043.63 374346 1293672 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,809.77 374396 1293673 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,105.07 374397 1293674 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,845.00 374394 1293675 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,067.14 374395 1293676 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 261.50 374675 1295023 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,292.00 374676 1295024 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 394672 6/18/2015 110977 SOW, ADAMA 81.25 ART WORK SOLD 374310 060815 81.25 394673 6/18/2016 103658 ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/28/15 374314 060115 75.00 394674 6/18/2015 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 446.63 GOLF TEES 374503 0000754063 446.63 394675 6/18/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 121.75 374677 5548 121.75 394676 6/18/2015 129409 STEEN, BARB 6.83 ART WORK SOLD 374311 060815 6.83 394677 6/18/2015 136602 STEINBAUER, JENNIFER 48.00 SWITCHED TENNIS SESSIONS 374260 REFUND 5101.4413 5760.6136 5440.5511 b1:11044 -SE! li5[�S�ISfK3 1600.4390.02 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD TENNIS PROGRAM ART CENTER REVENUES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2015 — 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394677 6/18/2015 136502 STEINBAUER, JENNIFER Continued... 48.00 394678 6/18/2015 136103 STILLMAN, NORTON 16.95 ART WORK SOLD 374566 061215 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.95 394679 6/18/2015 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 1,630.00 CABLE INSTALLATION 374614 18753 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 1,630.00 394680 6/18/2016 133612 SUDDATH RELOCATION SYSTEMS 984.00 MOVE ELECTION EQUIPMENT 374567 3910 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 861.00 MOVE ELECTION EQUIPMENT 374568 3912 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 1,845.00 394681 6/18/2015 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 2,247.39 HERBICIDE 00006345 374505 11139 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,247.39 394682 6/18/2015 104932 TAYLOR MADE 114.66 PUTTER 374571 30799919 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 205.00 GOLF CLUBS 374570 30857709 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 525.00 GOLF CLUBS 374569 30862609 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 844.66 394683 6/18/2015 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 155.39 SPRAY SCENT 374506 S214737 -IN 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 155.39 394684 6/18/2015 136495 THINGVOLD TECH SYSTEMS INC. 1,798.20 FIRE SYSTEM MONITORING 00001036 374261 100 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,798.20 394685 6/18/2015 102798 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 811.99 MAY 2015 SERVICES 374195 831939726 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 811.99 394686 6/18/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 98.25 374678 898235 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 17.15 374679 898236 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL is 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 33 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL i FIELD MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394686 6/18/2015 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Continued... 2,589.05 374401 898986 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 112.00 374399 898987 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 68.00 374400 B99070 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,884.45 394687 6/18/2015 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 199.00 ART/CULTURE COMM MEETING 374572 M21375 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 199.00 394688 6/18/2016 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 185.24 WELDING EQUIP RENTAL 374196 10082758 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 70.86 WELDING GAS 374197 40028135 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 31.53 WELDING TANKS 374459 40028136 5761.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 287.63 394689 6/18/2016 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC 115.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 374573 33812115 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 115.00 394690 6/18/2015 106188 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVERY INC. 2,500.00 DECK/UNDECK 374460 500784 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,500.00 394691 6/18/2015 102160 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 245.00 SEED MIXTURE 374201 35070 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.50 WATTLE STRAW 00001124 374199 35117 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 175.50 WATTLE STRAW 00001129 374200 35126 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 245.00 SEED MIXTURE 374202 35154 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 706.00 394692 6/18/2015 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. 253.91 FIELD PAINT 00001110 374262 1501-003590 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 253.91 394693 6/18/2015 100050 USPS 1,000.00 TMS# 202739 374263 METER 1400.6235 POSTAGE 1,000.00 394694 6/18/2015 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 15,590.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001202 374461 21610 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS is 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 33 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL i FIELD MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 394694 6/18/2016 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 5,836.82 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001038 374203 21613 5913.6180 6,336.63 WATER MAIN PARTS 00001201 374462 21630 5913.6530 27,765.45 394695 6/18/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 517.60 CAN LINERS 00001128 374204 351200-00 1645.6406 517.60 394696 6/18/2015 122716 VANDER VORT, KIM 40.00 CANCELLATION 374574 GOLF REFUNDS 5401.4602 69.00 CANCELLATION 374574 GOLF REFUNDS 5401.4593 110.00 CANCELLATION 374574 GOLF REFUNDS 5401.4602 219.00 394697 6/18/2015 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.01 374463 9743188560 1140.6188 35.01 374463 9743188560 1322.6185 210.16 374463 9743188560 1554.6188 242.83 374463 9743188560 1260.6188 315.09 374463 9743188560 1495.6188 455.15 374463 9743188560 1470.6168 740.17 374463 9743188560 1400.6160 35.01 374463 9743188560 44012.6710 210.06 374463 9743188560 5910.6188 50.53 374464 9743241068 1470.6188 539.07 374464 9743241068 1400.6406 31.14 374464 9743241068 5910.6188 50.53 374464 9743241068 5910.6188 35.01 374465 9744876319 1140.6168 35.01 374465 9744876319 1322.6185 64.19 374465 9744876319 1160.6406 96.03 374465 9744876319 1646.6188 210.08 374465 9744876319 1260.6188 210.29 374465 9744876319 1554.6188 340.77 374465 9744876319 1495.6188 455.23 374465 9744876319 1470.6188 805.41 374465 9744876319 1400.6160 35.01 374465 9744876319 44012.6710 46.69 374465 9744876319 5760.6188 347.78 374465 9744876319 5910.6188 Subledger Account Description Continued... CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES LESSONS GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE LESSONS TELEPHONE LIGHT & POWER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE LIGHT & POWER GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 34 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION LITTER REMOVAL GOLF REVENUES GOLF REVENUES GOLF REVENUES PLANNING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS ENGINEERING GENERAL INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING GENERAL (BILLING) FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL (BILLING) PLANNING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FINANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL (BILLING) 150.00 394703 6/18/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 40.26 374266 7158304 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 40.26 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 35 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394697 6/18/2015 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS Continued... 50.53 374466 9744929053 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 789.07 374466 9744929053 1400.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.12 374466 9744929053 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 50.53 374466 9744929053 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 6,554.51 394698 6/18/2015 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 321.14 CORD 00006346 374508 528150003 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 44.89 MICRO SWITCHES 00006349 374509 528150004 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 366.03 394699 6/18/2015 101064 VESSCOINC. 101.14 NOZZLE 374615 63539 5311.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 101.14 394700 6/18/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 238.50 BALLASTS 00001951 374208 9300616 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.28 VERTICAL COVERS 00001954 374264 9320289 5553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 78.53 HINGE COVER, HUBS 00001050 374205 9337851 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 128.92 PHOTO CONTROLS 00001975 374206 9346246 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 257.26_ WIRE 00001086 374209 9358766 1500.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 3,215.25 WIRE 00001097 374210 9366135 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 64.34 SCREW COVERS 00001113 374575 9372899 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 53.42 WIRE, WIRE STRIPPER 00001111 374211 9376730 1500.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 16.38 TOGGLE SWITCH COVERS 00001126 374467 9381322 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 112.85- RETURN 374265 CM545088 5553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 70.68- CREDIT 374207 CM647701 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE ' 4,028.35 394701 6/18/2015 104106 WAACK, SUSAN 18.00 LICENSE PLATES 374692 REIMBURSE 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.00 394702 6/18/2015 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/30/15 374315 060115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 394703 6/18/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 40.26 374266 7158304 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 40.26 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 36 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394703 6/18/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN Continued... 394704 6/18/2015 132450 WATER TOWER CLEAN & COAT INC. 2,700.00 WATER TOWER INSPECTION 374267 WT77750 5914.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 2,700.00 394705 6/1812015 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 1,659.56 DIESEL / GAS 00006431 374510 211970 5422.6561 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,125.03 GAS 00006430 374511 211971 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 2,784.59 394706 6/18/2015 124475 WENISCH, DOREEN 4.35 RETURNED PARKING PERMIT 374594 REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 60.00 RETURNED PARKING PERMIT 374594 REFUND 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 64.35 394707 6/18/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 167.16- 374350 702886 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 188.00 374349 7033071 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 315.48 374682 7033983 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 400.48 374680 7033984 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,187.92 374683 7033986 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,668.61 374681 7033987 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,593.33 394708 6/18/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 4,385.90 374406 1080333926 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,367.47 374351 1080333927 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 45.15 374352 1080333928 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,419.49 374413 1080333929 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 366.30 374408 1080333931 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,050.05 374407 1080333932 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 204.24 374410 1080333933 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 86.18 374409 1080333954 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 897.20 374411 1080333955 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 118.30 374412 1080333956 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 124.68- 374353 2080091683 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13, 815.60 394709 6/18/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 1,709.95 374356 1090416244 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 0 0 0 0 • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Council Check Register by GL Page- 37 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394709 6/18/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued... 163.50 374354 1090416245 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 200.00 374684 1090416250 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,146.50 374355 1090416664 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,380.70 374357 1090417452 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 384.45 374359 1090417453 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.10 374358 1090417454 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,539.50 374687 1090420007 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 123.00 374686 1090420008 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,994.85 374685 1090420009 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,665.55 394710 6/18/2015 136435 WITZKE, SARI 69.00 CLASS REFUND 374576 GOLF 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 69.00 394711 6/18/2015 136522 WOLFE, LOREN 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/25/15 374313 060115 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 394712 6/18/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 7,661.47 51-0837548-4 374212 458567343 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 1,938.42 514966303-6 374216 458625766 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 139.48 51-6137136-8 374268 458647438 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 32.07 51-4151897-6 374213 458658931 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 31.97 57567037-0 374215 458661178 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 50.97 51-8997917-7 374214 459050137 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 6,182.29 51-6824328-7 374273 459200464 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 5,746.75 51-6121102-5 374272 459268537 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 489.98 51-5619094-8 374269 459356386 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,336.23 51-5888961-7 374270 459366579 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 3,342.56 51-6840050-6 374271 459379832 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 33,505.05 51-5605640-1 374595 459908025 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 61,457.24 394713 6/18/2015 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 478.00 374689 14026A 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 106.00 374688 14036 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 584.00 394714 6/18/2015 136600 ZIMMER, ALYSSA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 394714 6/18/2015 136500 ZIMMER, ALYSSA 64.00 PROGRAM REFUND 64.00 647.755.45 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/18/2015 — 6/18/2015 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 374226 060515 1600.4390.03 Subledger Account Description Continued... FAB 4&5 Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 526,925.24 647,755.45 6/16/2015 9:47:55 Page - 38 Business Unit PARKADMIN. GENERAL 0 0 0 0 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 197,547.45 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,282.21 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 992.64 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 6,375.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 47,686.52 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 9,214.37 04500 dANDO FUND 1,598.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,221.18 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 653.30 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,544.59 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 54,611.75 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 14,403.18 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 46.43 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 9,082.10 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 11,551.53 05800 LIQUOR FUND 171,639.92 05900 UTILITY FUND 98,941.98 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 184.40 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 9,131.80 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,675.92 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 371.18 Report Totals 647,755.45 • • CITY OF EDINA 6/16/2015 9:48:05 Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/18/2015 - 6/18/2015 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies nd proce res da�q i i +_ R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1543 6/25/2015 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 10,841.00 F250 TRUCK 00005173 374797 0144017-IN 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 10, 841.00 1544 6/26/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 72.00 374931 1898064 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 92.80 374930 1899706 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 48.80 374929 1899708 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 24.80 374928 1899709 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 238.40 1545 6/25/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 613.77 COFFEE 374694 1181612 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 613.77 1546 6/25/2015 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 272.00 GENERAL LABOR SERVICES 374734 146473-5/15 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 272.00 1547 6/25/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 156.55 374939 48669700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 515.38 374938 48677800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 218.60 374759 48678000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,054.90 374937 48769400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 80.41 374940 92130300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6.50- 374760 92142200 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6.90- 374941 92142300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,012.44 1548 6/25/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 44.51 INK CARTRIDGE 374817 OE-395923-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 27.06 CORK TILES 374818 OE-397363-1 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 42.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 374695 WO-122968-1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 47.24 FOOTREST 374696 WO-123049-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 161.26 1549 6/25/2015 101376 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 364.00 DOOR HANDLE 00008047 374819 593827 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 364.00 1650 6/25/2015 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1550 6/25/2015 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS Continued... 24.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 374697 108880 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 24.77 1551 6/25/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 712.94 MUFFLER 00005420 374820 80092SAV 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 189.66 PIPE ASSEMBLY, CLAMPS 00005416 374698 966590 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.11 BELT 00005423 374821 967784 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.71 MOTOR, BOLTS 00005423 374822 967819 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 996.42 1552 6/25/2015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 109.24 SURFACE KEYBOARD 00004347 374735 VW70868 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 960.35 SURFACE PROS 00004347 374736 VW84100 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 1,076.38 SURFACE PROS 00004347 374736 VW84100 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 73.21 POWER SUPPLY 00004347 374824 VX38641 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 73.22 POWER SUPPLY 00004347 374824 VX38641 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 2,716.04 TOUGHPAD FOR STREETS 00004344 374825 VZ40080 4615.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm 844.68 WIFI - PAMELA PK 374826 WB82044 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 5,853.12 1553 6/25/2015 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 588.00 PLBG/MECHANICAL INSPECTIONS 374831 7115 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 588.00 1554 6/25/2015 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 855.60 374944 188728 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 855.60 1555 6/25/2015 104020 DALCO 85.90 INSECT KILLER 374706 2893416 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 65.28 DISINFECTANT 374707 2895149 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 616.56 NEW MACHINE, PICKUP & REPLACE 375062 2895174 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 267.77 CARPET CARE, WIPES 374708 2895652 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,035.51 1656 6/25/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 3,419.45 374945 807470 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 21.50 374946 807471 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,865.85 374947 807472 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,306.80 0 0 0 1562 6/25/2015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,227.43 • 374981 197168 5842.5515 • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 1563 6/26/2015 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI CITY OF EDINA 2,742.00 6/24/2015 8:30:23 374878 38043 1160.6130 54.00 AUDIT FEES Council Check Register by GL 38043 Page- 3 36.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 5310.6130 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1556 6/25/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Continued... 1657 6/25/2015 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 3,595.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002669 375085 14183 05540.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 4,895.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002669 375085 14183 03482.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 8,490.00 1558 6/25/2015 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 1,504.80 FIELD PAINT 00001144 374863 107111 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,504.80 1559 6/2512015 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. 250.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTIONS 375087 102771 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 250.00 1560 6/25/2015 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 59.50 TOILET RENTAL 374867 89274 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 59.50 1561 6/25/2015 100858 LOGIS 1,286.25 IT CONSULTING 374876 40216 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,890.00 IT CONSULTING 374875 40248 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 630.00 374877 40278 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,121.00 374877 40278 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,666.00 374877 40278 1495.6160 DATAPROCESSING INSPECTIONS 4,040.00 374877 40278 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,969.00 374877 40278 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 6,098.00 374877 40278 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,935.00 374877 40278 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 1,393.00 GIS ITEMS 374874 40326 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 34,028.25 1562 6/25/2015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,227.43 374981 197168 5842.5515 1,227.43 1563 6/26/2015 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 2,742.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 1160.6130 54.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 5110.6130 36.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 5210.6130 74.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 5310.6130 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM POOL ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 1563 6/25/2015 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 203,840.38 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 229.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 180.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 44.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 127.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 80.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 268.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 268.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 268.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 1,013.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 117.00 AUDIT FEES 374878 38043 5,500.00 1564 6/25/2015 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 187.50 REFRESHER TRAINING 374879 17230 187.50 1565 6/25/2015 101483 MENARDS 299.26 AIR COMPRESSOR, SUPPLIES 00008048 374883 87722 108.17 ELECTRICAL PARTS/PARK SHELTEM0001157 374882 88157 108.00 UTILITY SINK 00001182 374881 88686 515.43 1566 6/25/2015 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 760.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 602.83 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 203,840.38 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 343,610.15 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 437,529.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 62,160.34 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 37,943.44 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 17,366.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 101,095.41 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 83,288.09 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 40,042.82 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 171,480.27 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 • Account No 5410.6130 5510.6130 5552.6130 5710.6130 5760.6130 5820.6130 5840.6130 5860.6130 5902.6130 5932.6130 5311.6103 5511.6406 1646.6530 5821.6530 375123 ARDEN PK 07127.1705.30 375123 ARDEN PK 08060.1705.30 375123 ARDEN PK 01412.1705.30 375123 ARDEN PK 05551.1705.30 375123 ARDEN PK 03487.1705.30 375123 ARDEN PK 04407.1705.30 375127 KNOLLS & DEWEY 01414.1705.30 HILL 375127 KNOLLS & DEWEY 03489.1705.30 HILL 375127 KNOLLS & DEWEY 05553.1705.30 HILL 375127 KNOLLS & DEWEY 04410.1705.30 HILL 37,5126 NEIGHBORHOOD 07128.1705.30 RECON 375126 NEIGHBORHOOD 01413.1705.30 • Subledger Account Description Continued... PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE GENERAL STORM SEWER POOL OPERATION ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY S127 ARDEN PARK D SIDEWALK INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON Arden Park D Reconstruction Arden Park D Reconstruction 54TH ST RECONSTRUCTION HOLLANDS NHOOD RECON Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 5128 COUNTRYSIDE H SIDEWALK EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON is • CLEANING SUPPLIES 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 5511.6511 • ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 TIRES 00005301 374897 CITY OF EDINA EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,977.70 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1550.6406 Council Check Register by GL 1568 6/25/2015 1550.6406 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 728.18 TOWELS, LINERS, GLOVES 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1566 6/25/2015 7991 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 590.78 CUPS, NAPKINS, STRAWS 374903 7994 426.99 RECON 374901 14,874.41 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 375126 NEIGHBORHOOD 03488.1705.30 374902 7999 2,872.25 RECON 62,050.14 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 375126 NEIGHBORHOOD 05552.1705.30 131.33 RECON 374745 165,474.97 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 375126 NEIGHBORHOOD 04409.1705.30 374746 86655 198.50 RECON 374744 49,403.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 375125 STORM SEWER 1346.6103 52,640.28 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 375124 VALLEY VIEW 01377.1705.30 20,952.11 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 375124 VALLEY VIEW 05557.1705.30 83222 88,612.82 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 375124 VALLEY VIEW 04415.1705.30 1,953,727.26 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 1567 6/25/2015 CLEANING SUPPLIES 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,977.70 TIRES 00005301 374897 210178176 EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,977.70 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1568 6/25/2015 1550.6406 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 728.18 TOWELS, LINERS, GLOVES 00002217 374900 7985 623.58 SOAP, TISSUE, LINERS, WIPES 374899 7991 590.78 CUPS, NAPKINS, STRAWS 374903 7994 426.99 CUPS, LIDS 374901 7997 502.72 CUTLERY SETS/NAPKINS 374902 7999 2,872.25 1569 6/25/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 131.33 374745 86635 58.50 374746 86655 198.50 BUSINESS CARDS 374744 86702 388.33 1570 6/25/2015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 123.62 MIRROR 00005385 374729 83222 123.62 1571 6/25/2015 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 383.27 TIE ROD ENDS 00005347 374916 E189377 164.53 TIE ROD ENDS, RETAINER 00005347 374915 E189377A 14.05 DRAIN PLUG, GASKET 00005411 374731 0136499 561.85 1553.6583 Subledger Account Description Continued... CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TIRES & TUBES • 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page - 5 Business Unit Countryside H Reconstruction Countryside H Reconstruction Countryside H Reconstruction PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD Valley View Rd Valley View Rd EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 118.00 GOLF BALLS 375032 CITY OF EDINA PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6/24/2015 8:30:23 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 446.10 MERCHANDISE 375033 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 235.91 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5440.5511 95.35 375035 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 5440.5511 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1571 6125/2015 118190 TURFWERKS LLC Continued... 1572 6/25/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 182.75 375009 0126348 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 182.75 374767 0126373 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 132.00 375007 0126887 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 132.00 375008 0126890 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 629.50 1573 6/25/2015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 91.60 CONCESSION PRODUCT 374923 42725121 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 9.22 374924 42725123 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 63.63 374925 42725124 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 164.45 1574 6/25/2015 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 221.42 LOGO PENS 374748 73720 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 326.41 LOGO PENS 374748 73720 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 326.41 LOGO PENS 374748 73720 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 874.24 1575 6/25/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 655.55 375010 396239-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 394715 6/25/2015 105075 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. 560.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00002015 374798 34277 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,275.85 REPAIRS TO FOUNTAIN 00002015 374799 34278 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,835.85 394716 6/25/2015 129458 ACME TOOLS 49.00 HAND WARMER 374800 3241687 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 330.55 ELITE COOLER 374801 3364816 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 379.55 394717 6/25/2015 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 118.00 GOLF BALLS 375032 900601642 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 446.10 MERCHANDISE 375033 900849120 5440.5511 235.91 375034 900869381 5440.5511 95.35 375035 900876372 5440.5511 2,727.33 375037 900883758 5440.5511 i 0 CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394717 6/25/2015 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY Continued... 93.85 375036 900884372 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 705.88 375038 900912893 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4,422.42 394718 6/25/2015 135313 AIR CLIMATE CONTROL INC. 105.00 COOLER DIAGNOSIS 375040 44520 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUBHOUSE 1,553.46 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 375041 44565 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 1,658.46 394719 6/25/2015 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 363.25 CO2 374802 32221507 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 363.25 394720 6/25/2015 135195 ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP 215.00 MAY 2015 COBRAADMIN 374803 27841 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 215.00 394721 6/25/2015 102171 ANDERSON -JOHNSON ASSOCIATES INC. 10,622.30 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION 374693 131090515 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 10, 622.30 394722 6/25/2015 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 1,028.57 CONCESSION PRODUCT 374804 506100151 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 526.66 374805 506120480 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 92.31 374806 506120481 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 437.60 375039 506120626 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 799.99 374807 506150111 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 407.73 CONCESSION PRODUCT 374809 506160024 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 678.61 374808 506190581 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 3,971.47 394723 6/25/2015 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 579.58 IRRIGATION STARTUP 374810 71058 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 579.58 394724 6/25/2015 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 290.64 CALHYPO, HCL 374811 43644 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,105.80 PIPE REPAIR 374812 43656 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,396.44 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394725 6/2512015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 384.00 374932 3038012 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 818.50 374933 3038015 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 42.00- 374935 316335 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6.90- 374934 316336 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,153.60 394726 6/25/2015 102120 ATOL, ROBERT 159.57 FRAME 375042 061915 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 159.57 394727 6/25/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 570.00 374936 2147 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 570.00 394728 6/25/2015 103486 BEND IN THE RIVER BIG BAND 125.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/6/15 375151 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 125.00 394729 6/25/2015 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING 3,500.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002682 375043 A161647 05540.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 6,480.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002682 375043 A161647 03482.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 5,121.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002697 375044 A171649 03489.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 4,150.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002697 375045 A173807 03489.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 19,251.00 394730 6/25/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 288.00 PIZZA 375026 D2813471 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 504.00 PIZZA 374815 D2813475 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 576.00 PIZZA 374814 D2813476 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,368.00 394731 6/25/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 201.45 COFFEE, TEA 374816 T116182 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 201.45 394732 6/2612015 124634 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 10,374.00 PAYMENT NO. 6 375046 P-23 #4 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 10, 374.00 394733 6/25/2015 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 0 0 0 0• • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394733 6/25/2015 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC Continued... 22,756.17 PAYMENT NO. 7 - FINAL 375047 P-23 #1 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 22,756.17 394734 6/25/2015 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 2,656.00 FINAL PAYMENT 375121 BR -10 1346.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 2,656.00 394735 6/25/2015 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,153.21 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003678 374751 81814119 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,153.21 394736 6/25/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,649.50 374942 127256 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,649.50 394737 6/25/2015 136584 BRAVURA CONSTRUCTION INC 2,500.00 ED135690 ESCROW REFUND 375048 5516 CHANTREY 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS RD 2,500.00 394738 6/25/2015 131337 BREMER BANK 660.50 2012B EEEP INTEREST 375050 7/1/15 3301.8220 INTEREST BONDS PIR DS REVENUES 660.50 394739 6/25/2015 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/7/15 375153 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 394740 6/25/2015 122074 BUIE, BARB 9.74 374823 061915 5760.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 88.97 374823 061915 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 98.71 394741 6/25/2015 136585 BULLIVANT, BUD 175.50 ART WORK SOLD 375049 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 175.50 394742 6/25/2015 132114 BURNETT, JASON 943.32 2012A EEEP INTEREST 375051 7/01/15 3301.8220 INTEREST BONDS PIR DS REVENUES 943.32 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 6/25/2015 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 375132 REFUND Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 15.00 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 394746 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394742 6/25/2015 132114 BURNETT, JASON 5.59 Continued... 375157 394743 6/25/2015 AVE 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 5.59 436.00- REBATE CREDIT 375058 926069609 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 288.42 MERCHANDISE 375052 926097363 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5,940.00 RANGE BALLS 375053 926105145 5424.6590 RANGE BALLS RANGE 216.26- COMPENSATION CREDIT 375059 926105290 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 374700 186.34 CLUB 375057 926106466 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 225.72 DRIVER 375056 926106490 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6/25/2015 675.62 CLUBS 375055 926106542 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 472.56 CLUBS 375054 926106567 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2951-6/15 7,136.40 1470.6188 61.27 394744 6/25/2015 374827 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 5511.6188 217.97 2,104.15 374943 00010958 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 394749 439.90 374761 610099 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 394745 6/25/2015 131095 CARDWELL, LINDA 15.00 BEER TASTING 375132 REFUND 1628.4392.09 15.00 394746 6/25/2015 136602 CEDAR CREEK CAPITAL LLC 5.59 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375157 5908 GRIMES AVE 5900.2015 5.59 394747 6/25/2015 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. 905.28 374699 3054802 5720.6186 83.00 374700 3055112 5311.6186 988.28 394748 6/25/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 156.70 952 285-2951 374701 2951-6/15 1470.6188 61.27 952 944-6522 374827 5522-6/15 5511.6188 217.97 394749 6/25/2015 100683 CHEMSEARCH 669.12 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 374828 1936692 5510.6103 669.12 394750 6/25/2015 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE • • SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS CUSTOMER REFUND HEAT HEAT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA ADMINISTRATION is 0 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page- 11 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PSTF OCCUPANCY ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF DOME PROGRAM • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394750 6/25/2015 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued... 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/8/15 375154 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 394751 6/25/2015 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 MAINTENANCE 374704 COM -0582 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 100.00 394752 6/25/2015 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 382.09 00113667-0120835016 374829 120835016-6/15 5111.6189 SEWER & WATER 167.07 00103650-0155251008 374702 15521008-6/15 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 447.40 00103650-0155252016 374703 155252016-6/15 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER 129.21 00121140-0155300028 374830 155300028-6/15 5552.6189 SEWER & WATER 1,125.77 394753 6/25/2015 134478 CLASSICAL ACTORS ENSEMBLE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/5/15 375149 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 394754 6/25/2015 121616 COATES ROOFING INC. 3,750.00 WOODDALE GAZEBO ROOFING 374832 15096 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,482.00 ARNESON GAZEBO ROOFING 374833 15097 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,232.00 394755 6/25/2015 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 819.99 JUL 2015 MAINTENANCE 375060 062315 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 819.99 394756 6/25/2015 120433 COMCAST 83.84 8772 10 614 0540232 374705 540232-6/15 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 93.34 8772 10 614 0540232 374705 540232-6/15 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 142.75 8772 10 614 0540372 374834 540372-6/15 5552.6168 TELEPHONE 319.93 394757 6/25/2015 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 1,033.61 CABLE TV ADS 374741 9630-6/15 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,033.62 CABLE TV ADS 374741 9630-6/15 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,033.62 CABLE TV ADS 374741 9630-6/15 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 610.00 TVADVERTISING 374835 NW651162 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 3,710.85 0 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page- 11 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PSTF OCCUPANCY ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394768 6/26/2016 136711 CONFLUENCE Continued... 4,500.00 PARK SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 375061 11746 47086.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PLAYGROUND PRINTING LTD - 99 TOOLS REPAIR PARTS TOOLS SURCHARGE TELEPHONE LESSONS 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page - 12 Business Unit PARK PLANNING & DESIGN VETERANS MEMORIAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS PAYROLL CLEARING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 0 4,500.00 394759 6/25/2015 136598 CRANE, PETER 323.33 FLOWERS FOR VET MEM 375133 REIMBURSE 47073.6710 323.33 394760 6/26/2016 127231 CURTI, JULIE 48.00 MINI HORNETS PROGRAM 375141 REFUND 1600.4390.01 48.00 394761 6/26/2015 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 936.00 NEWSLETTER 374836 302868 1628.6575 936.00 394762 6/25/2015 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,667.60 JULY 2015 PREMIUMS 374837 F018342-7/15 9900.2033.16 2,667.60 394763 6/25/2015 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 85.57 EXTRACTOR 00001302 374709 10113 1553.6556 41.50 ALLEN WRENCHES 00005388 374838 12257 1553.6530 18.29 EXTENSION CORD 00005388 374839 12286 1553.6556 145.36 394764 6/25/2016 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 8,402.98 MAY 2015 SURCHARGE 375063 22540053060 1495.4380 8,402.98 394765 6/25/2015 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 27.00 650487671 374840 650487671-6/15 5511.6188 27.00 394766 6/25/2015 136484 DIEBEL, MIKE 45.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 375027 061715 5401.4602 45.00 394767 6/25/2015 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 505.00 APPAREL 375064 538833 5440.5511 505.00 0 0 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PLAYGROUND PRINTING LTD - 99 TOOLS REPAIR PARTS TOOLS SURCHARGE TELEPHONE LESSONS 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page - 12 Business Unit PARK PLANNING & DESIGN VETERANS MEMORIAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS PAYROLL CLEARING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 0 0 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page- 13 Business Unit EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES PSTF RANGE POOL OPERATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE FRANCE AVE LIGHTING&CONDUIT UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN i 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394767 6/25/2015 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. Continued... 394768 6/25/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 320.00 CLASS OF 2015 AD 374737 226635 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 320.00 394769 6/25/2015 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WIN LECTRIC CO. 4.88 RECEPTICLES 00001102 375065 11980500 7412.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 46.51 FAN PARTS 00001167 374842 12021500 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.34 FITTING FOR J -BOX 00001193 374841 12037800 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 75.73 394770 6/26/2015 105906 EGAN COMPANY 279,239.59 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 375122 NO. L-61 08061.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 279,239.59 394771 6/25/2015 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,677.50 UTILITY RATE STUDY 374710 67632 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,890.00 FPW SITE PLANNING/TIF 374845 67633 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 1,575.00 TIF OVERSIGHT 374844 67634 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 105.00 TIF OVERSIGHT 374843 67636 9240.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 6,247.50 394772 6/25/2015 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 2,984.62 CHECK VALVES 00001155 375066 0055542 -IN 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,984.62 394773 6/25/2015 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 61.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003517 374752 1742772 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 61.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003518 374754 1742774 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 1,097.75 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003520 374753 1745344 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 1,220.75 394774 6/25/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 66.52 FRONT SWAY BAR LINK KITS 374714 1-4719609 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 43.37- CREDIT 374715 69-180530 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 300.22 SPARK PLUGS, DRUMS, SHOES 374711 69-181173 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 34.03 BELT 374712 69-181176 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 35.44 TRANSMISSION FLUID 374713 69-181284 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20.71- CREDIT 374849 69-181447 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 195.44 WATER PUMP KIT 374848 69-182031 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 0 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page- 13 Business Unit EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES PSTF RANGE POOL OPERATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE FRANCE AVE LIGHTING&CONDUIT UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 -- 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394774 6/25/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 34.44 BELT 374847 69-182197 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.88 BRAKE LINING KITS 374846 69-182490 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 686.89 394775 6/25/2015 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,485.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 375028 061715 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,485.00 394776 6/25/2015 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 1,250.00 CLEAN WINDOWS IN PARKING RAMPS 375067 2315-10605 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,250.00 394777 6/26/2015 134860 FISHER, DAVID 361.10 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375068 061815 1495.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE INSPECTIONS 361.10 394778 6/25/2015 136583 FLUID INTERIORS LLC 524.66 OFFICE WALL SYS ENGINEERING 375069 38697 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 524.66 394779 6/25/2015 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 142.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375070 061715 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 142.60 394780 6/25/2015 134607 FREEMAN, RUSSELL 220.00 SESSIONS CANCELED 375159 GOLF REFUND 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 220.00 394781 6/25/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 93.09 ACCT 0039263 LINENS 375071 1013146858 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 93.09 394782 6/25/2015 136577 GAGNON INC. 21,205.00 DUCTWORK, INSULATION 00003568 374755 58978 450003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT MECH INSULATION 21, 205.00 394783 6/25/2015 134005 GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 500.00 APPLICATION TRAINING 375072 G20-11503 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 500.00 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394784 6/25/2015 103185 GERTENS Continued... 39.00 SPIREAS 375073 355387/1 1301.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 39.00 394785 6/25/2015 114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO. 250.00 RESTRIPE WALNUT RIDGE PK 375074 15020 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 250.00 RESTRIPE NORMANDALE PK 375075 15021 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 950.00 RESTRIPE GARDEN PK 375076 15022 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 450.00 RESTRIPE HIGHLAND PK 375077 15023 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,900.00 394786 6/25/2015 101103 GRAINGER 308.46 TRASH CAN, MAILBOX NUMBERS 00006364 375078 9754673979 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 9.36 SPRAY BOTTLES 00002150 374852 9758194949 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 56.96 SAFETY GLASSES 00001150 374853 9760457003 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 130.90 VESTS 00005346 374851 9763154318 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.24 VEHICLE PLACARD 00005346 374850 9763154326 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 542.92 394787 6/25/2015 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 117.82 REPLACE LOOSE STRUTS 00005418 374716 83502 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.82 394788 6/25/2015 135846 GRANEY, ESTHER 64.17 GARDENING SUPPLIES 374718 REIMBURSE 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 64.17 394789 6/25/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 326.50 374949 183048 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,316.00 374948 183107 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,644.50 394790 6/25/2015 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 480.43 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 374854 152117 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 480.43 394791 6/25/2015 136574 GREENE, RHONDA 75.00 SIGNED UP TWICE FOR PROGRAM 374717 REFUND 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 75.00 394792 6/25/2015 100786 GREUPNER, JOE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394792 6/25/2015 100785 GREUPNER, JOE Continued... 11,385.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 375029 061715 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 11, 385.00 394793 6/25/2015 134391 GRIMES, LAURYN 34.27 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375079 061915 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 34.27 394794 6/25/2015 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 2,826.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 375030 061715 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 2,826.00 394795 6/25/2015 136591 GUSTAFSON, ALICIA 50.00 SIGNED UP TWICE 375142 REFUND 1600.4390.25 CHEERLEADING CAMP PARKADMIN. GENERAL 50.00 394796 6/25/2015 114129 HALDEMAN HOMME INC. 1,149.00 LOCKERS 00001777 374855 155442 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,149.00 394797 6/25/2015 101346 HALL, KEVIN 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/9/15 375156 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 394798 6/25/2015 132996 HAMMARGREN & MEYER P.A. 120.00 LEGAL CONSULTING 374856 18752 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 120.00 394799 6/25/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,987.80 CHEMICALS 00005285 375080 3737964 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,255.37 CHLORINE, SODIUM HYDRO 374857 3737965 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 4,243.17 394800 6/25/2015 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT 56.80- CREDIT 00005076 374859 C95419 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.95 GAS SPRING 00005413 374858 C95736 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.15 394801 6/25/2015 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 4,778.22 HYDRAULIC REPAIR PARTS 00001204 375081 E042360 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 446.46 STAND PIPE REPAIR TOPS 00001163 375082 E042522 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 -- 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394801 6/25/2015 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Continued... 5,224.68 394802 6/25/2015 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 1,165.40 OFFICE CHAIRS 375083 565948 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,165.40 394803 6/25/2015 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 320.00 MONITOR 00004345 375084 55993724 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 320.00 394804 6/25/2016 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 337.03 FLOOR SEALER, SOAP 00002225 374862 601642124 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 313.12 SANITIZER, TOWELS 00002226 374860 601645712 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 97.10 HOSE DRAIN 374861 700187086 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 747.25 394805 6/25/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 654.50 374950 767840 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,887.45 374951 768187 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,541.95 394806 6/25/2015 136595 HOLDERNESS, SUZI 38.00 SWITCHED TENNIS PROGRAM 375134 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 38.00 394807 6/25/2015 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 455.78 CHLORINE, ACID, REAGENTS 00002222 374865 150601049 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 597.50 SLIDE REPAIRS 374864 SV150527047 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,053.28 394808 6/26/2015 136601 HUBER, WADE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/5/15 375150 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 394809 6/25/2015 136576 HUWE, GAIL 1,384.73 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 374749 061615 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,384.73 394810 6/25/2015 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 337.58 375086 608369676 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394810 6/25/2015 101146 IMPACT TELECOM Continued... 337.58 394811 6/25/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 680.00 374762 29823 680.00 394812 6/25/2015 121034 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING 70.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 374738 2015 70.00 394813 6/25/2015 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 875.00 SAFETYAUDIT 374866 20072444 875.00 394814 6/25/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,937.75 374955 2368169 96.00 374956 2368170 90.00 374954 2368179 7,523.05 374952 2368180 43.00 374953 2368181 763.00 375088 2380152 12,452.80 394815 6/25/2015 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 177.28 ROUNDUP 00006351 375089 72012844 67.54 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001160 374868 72127201 244.82 394816 6/25/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 128.03 374763 5183258 124.64 374764 5184743 29.16 374978 5188899 1.16 374976 5188901 1,514.80 374979 5188902 .58 374967 5188903 29.16 374963 5188904 651.96 374965 5188905 366.73 374980 5188907 2.32 374977 5188909 3,668.07 374968 5188912 is 5862.5514 1190.6105 5310.6103 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page - 18 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5422.6545 CHEMICALS YORK SELLING 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIELD MAINTENANCE 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 0 • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394816 6/25/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 5,724.06 374975 5188914 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,407.91 374972 5188915 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,736.58 374974 5188916 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,350.79 374969 5188917 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.23 374971 5188918 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,134.83 374973 5168919 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 382.11 374970 5188920 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,657.36 374966 5168921 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 74.02 374964 5188922 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,346.81 374960 5188923 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,421.92 374957 5188924 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,613.67 374961 5188925 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21.99 374962 5188926 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 391.86 374958 5188927 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 51.16 374959 5188928 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 67.16- 374765 528883 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 34, 858.75 394817 6/25/2015 136597 JOHNSON, RODNEY 35.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375135 EDINBOROUGH 5701.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 35.00 394818 6/25/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 167.96 UNIFORMS 00003603 374757 277821-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 15.00 UNIFORMS 00003590 374756 278172 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 182.96 394819 6/25/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 17,000.00 50TH/FRANCE STUDY 374869 6710437 9232.6133 PROFESS SERVICES -ENGINEERING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 7,204.22 SOUTH RAMP STUDY 374870 6710438 9232.6133 PROFESS SERVICES -ENGINEERING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 24,204.22 394820 6/25/2015 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 967.50 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 375031 061715 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 967.50 394821 6/25/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 269.38 FITTINGS, CONNECTORS, WASHERS 374873 9303330037 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 341.35 BATTERY, CONTACTS, COUPLERS 00005302 374872 9303330038 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 610.73 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394821 6/25/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 394822 6/25/2015 135068 LAZARETTI, DELORES 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 357837 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 394823 6/25/2015 120016 LOFTUS ORNAMENTAL IRON INC. 4,385.00 INTERIOR RAILING 374871 12015-20464 5511.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,385.00 394824 6/25/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 145.36 DIRT SHOE SCRAPERS 00005419 374719 2153684 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 145.36 394825 6/25/2015 134612 MAJICA, SERGIO 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/9/15 375155 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 394826 6/25/2015 134187 MCMAHON, MARY JO 82.55 ART WORK SOLD 375090 060815 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 82.55 394827 6/25/2015 103720 MEDTECH 907.30 WRISTBANDS 374880 IND00456583 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 907.30 394828 6/25/2015 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 374884 4687 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 171.00 394829 6/25/2015 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 380.63 CUST# W052 ANNUAL FEE 00001205 375091 6/10/15 STMT 5923.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 380.63 394830 6/25/2015 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 70.24 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005387 374885 494019 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.24 394831 6/2512015 131972 MGA HOSPITALITY 616.57 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 314925 6809 CRESTON RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 616.57 0 • • 0 • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 -- 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394831 6/25/2015 131972 MGA HOSPITALITY Continued... 394832 6/25/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER 29.99 MOUSE 00004348 374886 5609921 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 75.98 USB DRIVES 00004349 374887 5609933 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 44.99 SURFACEPRO CASE 00004350 374743 5616443 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 150.96 394833 6/25/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,000.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIRS 00002652 375092 34980 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 3,950.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIRS 00002652 375092 34980 03487.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 2,500.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002670 375093 34982 03487.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 1,282.50 CURB STOP REPLACEMENT 00001206 374889 34983 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,208.75 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 00001207 374888 34986 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 11, 941.25 394834 6/25/2015 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 63.14 CO2 374720 183177290 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 63.14 394835 6/25/2015 101302 MINNESOTA CITY/COUNTY 187.20 MEMBERSHIP - SCOTT NEAL 375131 2015-2016 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 187.20 394836 6/25/2016 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 CLASS D H2O LICENSE 375094 CHET BOOM 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION 23.00 394837 6/25/2015 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 585.08 INSTRUMENT DUSTER 00005383 374721 P79033 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 585.08 394838 6/25/2015 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 55.00 SD EXAM FEE 375095 BRANDON FREEMAN 5923.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 55.00 394839 6/25/2015 101637 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 55.00 SD EXAM FEE 375096 CHET BOOM 5923.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 55.00 394840 6/25/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394840 6/25/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 412.00 NOTEPADS 375097 17838 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 412.00 394841 6/25/2015 132597 MIXMI BRANDS INC. 96.00 FROZEN YOGURT 374890 2464 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 96.00 394842 6/25/2015 122036 M -K GRAPHICS 1,178.99 A/PCHECKS 374742 6275 1160.6160 DATAPROCESSING FINANCE 1,178.99 394843 6/25/2015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 181.50 374982 100865 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 181.50 394844 6/25/2015 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 126.91 LIGHTING FOR CITY HALL 374722 89573 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 117.00 LIGHTING FOR CITY HALL 374723 89686 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 243.91 394845 6/25/2015 100927 NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC 15.39 LEAF SKIMMER 00002150 374891 5695 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 15.39 394846 6/25/2015 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 352.64 LIGHTS 00005412 374724 38971 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 352.64 394847 6/25/2015 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 24.69 375100 W15050660 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 24.69 375100 W15050660 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 49.38 375100 W15050660 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.07 375100 W15050660 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 74.07 375100 W15050660 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 172.83 375100 W15050660 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 271.59 375100 W15050660 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 49.38 375100 W15050660 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 24.69 375100 W15050660 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 98.76 375100 W15050660 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 111.10 375100 W15050660 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 0 0 0 • 105612 OFFICE TEAM 9 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 378.00 PTTEMP 375098 43187549 Council Check Register by GL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 375099 43203537 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394847 6/2512015 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 394849 6/25/2015 Continued... 111.11 375100 W15050660 5760.6188 TELEPHONE 49.38 375100 W15050660 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 5300.2039 74.07 375100 W15050660 5841.6188 TELEPHONE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 74.07 375100 W15050660 5861.6186 TELEPHONE AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 49.38 375100 W15050660 5913.6188 TELEPHONE 260.70 375101 W15050665 5420.6188 TELEPHONE • 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page - 23 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION CLUB HOUSE 394848 6/25/2015 105612 OFFICE TEAM 378.00 PTTEMP 375098 43187549 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 405.00 375099 43203537 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 783.00 394849 6/25/2015 136593 OLEJNICZAK, ELLE 1.91 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375136 AQUATIC CTR 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 26.22 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375136 AQUATIC CTR 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 28.13 394850 6/25/2015 136594 OLSON, ERIC 3.50 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375137 AQUATIC CTR 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 48.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375137 AQUATIC CTR 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 51.50 394851 6/25/2015 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 384.67 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375102 061515 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 384.67 394852 6/25/2015 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. 70.00 LEAD TESTING 374725 1500416 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 70.00 394853 6/25/2015 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 95,670.96 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 375128 BIRCHCREST 07115.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S115 VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK 38,978.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 375128 BIRCHCREST 07105.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S105 TH100 SIDEWALK 291,133.38 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 375128 BIRCHCREST 01410.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 131,667.63 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 375128 BIRCHCREST 05540.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 143,577.62 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 375128 BIRCHCREST 03482.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 296,009.67 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 375128 BIRCHCREST 04398.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 997,037.76 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394854 6/25/2015 118899 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Continued... 29,386.73 FINAL PAYMENT 375129 MILL & OVERLAY 01423.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS OLINGER BLVD M&O 29,386.73 394855 6/25/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 2,888.26 374983 8503341 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,600.25 374984 8503347 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 222.25 374985 8503372 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,710.76 394856 6/25/2015 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 467.66 374892 43278548 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 599.41 375103 43278558 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 186.06 374893 43278605 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 846.20 374758 45158380 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 617.20 374986 48487809 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,716.53 394857 6/25/2015 117087 PETERSON COMPANIES 23,294.60 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 375130 PROMENADE 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 62,406.42 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 375130 PROMENADE 01251.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS A-251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE 24,458.71 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 375130 PROMENADE 04401.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PROMENADE H2O FEATURE&PATH 65,897.22 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 375130 PROMENADE 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 176,056.95 394858 6/25/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 385.14 374766 2802005 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .20 374996 2805740 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3.48 374991 2805743 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 767.62 374990 2805745 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,607.72 374992 2805746 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 753.72 374989 2805747 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,926.02 374995 2805748 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,620.70 374988 2805749 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,585.25 374994 2805750 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 219.48 374987 2805751 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,592.56 374993 2806536 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13,461.89 394859 6/25/2015 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 190.00 374997 24564 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 0 is 0 0 6/24/2015 6:30:23 Page - 25 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS 6,718.77 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 374898 061915 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 394866 6/25/2015 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE Council Check Register by GL 120.00 VALVES, KNOB 374904 12412 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 120.00 6/25/2015 -- 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394859 6/25/2015 SAFETY BOOTS 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 268 1261.6406 Continued... CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 161.49 190.00 375104 268 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 394860 6/25/2015 100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 394868 6/25/2015 2,291.20 PIPE FITTINGS 00001139 374895 0065143 -IN 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 173.10 96.50 NUTS, BOLTS, GASKETS 00001139 374894 0065144 -IN 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 173.10 2,387.70 394861 6/25/2015 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 374896 330779 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 2,223.86 394862 6/25/2015 104235 PLATENBERG, CATHY 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/7/15 375152 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 394863 6/25/2015 136596 PODBELSKI, ADAM 100.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375138 EDINBOROUGH 5701.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 100.00 394864 6/25/2015 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 200.00 STAFF PORTRAITS 374726 061115 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 200.00 394865 6/25/2016 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 0 6/24/2015 6:30:23 Page - 25 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS 6,718.77 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 374898 061915 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 6,718.77 394866 6/25/2015 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 120.00 VALVES, KNOB 374904 12412 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 120.00 394867 6/25/2015 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 131.74 SAFETY BOOTS 375104 268 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 161.49 SAFETY BOOTS 375104 268 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 293.23 394868 6/25/2015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 173.10 SOFTENER SALT 00001164 374727 00316953 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 173.10 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394869 6/25/2015 116393 ROGERS, RUSS Continued... 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/2/15 375148 062315 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 394870 6/25/2015 100982 ROTO-ROOTER 8,425.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002504 375105 04818374443 03489.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 8,425.00 394871 6/25/2015 117807 SAM'S CLUB 297.60 SUPPLIES 374728 MAY2015 7410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 297.60 394872 6/25/2015 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 19.96- CREDIT 00001175 374906 061915 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 60.49 "** "" *"' .**9 350 374905 FOOD 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 40.53 394873 6/25/2015 136603 SATTERLEE, LAUREN 110.00 ORGANICS RECYCLING EVENT 375158 REIMBURSE 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 110.00 394874 6/25/2015 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 486.00 PARTICIPANT FEE 374739 008816-6/15 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 486.00 394875 6/25/2015 136600 SEYS, SCOTT 135.00 CANCELED PROGRAM 375139 REFUND 5701.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 135.00 394876 6/25/2015 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 55.65 TIMECLOCK RENTAL 374907 13072713 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 55.65 394877 6/25/2015 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 122.50 FIRE ALARM SERVICE 375106 813749134 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 122.50 394878 6/25/2015 132195 SMALL LOT MN 168.00 374998 3093 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 168.00 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 -- 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394879 6/25/2015 136592 SORENSEN, MELANEE Continued... 50.00 MINI HAWKS SOCCER CAMP 375143 REFUND 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 33.00 TENNIS PROGRAM 375144 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 83.00 394880 6/25/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,184.51 374999 1296155 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8,970.09 375000 1296157 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,122.50 375004 1296158 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 50.88 375003 1296159 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,373.54 375002 1296160 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12,392.45 375001 1296161 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 80.75 375005 1296162 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 30,174.72 394881 6/25/2015 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 525.00 MOVIE RENTAL 374908 DB2058718 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 525.00 394882 6/25/2015 136586 SWENSON, JULIE 78.00 ART CLASS REFUND 375107 16768 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 394883 6/26/2016 106673 TAPCO 70.01 SAFETYSIGNS 00001033 375108 1491441 5920.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 70.01 394884 6/25/2015 104932 TAYLOR MADE 1,078.98 GOLF BALLS 375109 30902408 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 711.48 GOLF BALLS 375110 30902409 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,790.46 394885 6/25/2015 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 223.80 375111 899736 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,922.95 375006 900521 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,146.75 394886 6/26/2015 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 397.00 6/2/15 COUNCIL MEETING 374747 M21394 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 199.00 PARK BOARD MINUTES 374730 M21395 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 596.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394886 6/25/2015 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. Continued... 394887 6/25/2015 136589 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS INC. 598.00 GENERATOR SERVICE 00006414 375112 150325-027 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 598.00 394888 6/25/2015 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 904.97 MUNTERS UNITS REPAIRS 374909 16728 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,257.00 LABOR / MATERIALS 374910 16736 5511.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,161.97 394889 6/25/2015 123649 TOWMASTER 289.60 HINGE, SPINNER 00005417 374911 369896 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 289.60 394890 6/25/2015 116535 TRAVELERS 175.00 374914 000483324 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 52.50 374913 000483672 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 66.80 DEDUCTIBLE 374912 000483673 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 294.30 394891 6/25/2015 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 250.28 HANDICAP BUTTON REPAIR 00001112 374917 721923 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 250.28 394892 6/25/2015 103973 ULINE 86.11 JARS 00001039 375113 68169940 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 86.11 394893 6/25/2015 133459 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATIVE 185.00 957390 MOWER PARTS 00001089 374918 75174 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 185.00 394894 6/25/2015 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. 706.88 FIELD PAINT, RAKES 00001156 374919 1501-003650 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 706.88 394895 6/25/2015 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 2,462.93 DEHUMIDIFIERS 00001140 375114 663476 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 2,462.93 0 0 0 • 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page - 29 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CLUB HOUSE YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARKADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394896 6/25/2016 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. Continued... 1,980.00 FLOWABLE FILL - WATER MAIN 00001208 374920 21653 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,980.00 394897 6/25/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 68.77 STAINLESS STEEL WIPES 375115 351475-00 5420.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 782.65 LIQUOR BAGS 374921 352058-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 387.64 LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 375116 352311-00 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,239.06 394898 6/25/2015 136699 VEERAMACHANENI, JENNIFER 135.00 CANCELED PROGRAM 375140 REFUND 5701.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 135.00 394899 6/25/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 633.14 UNDERGROUND WIRING 00001138 375117 9386348 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 321.05 FANS FOR BATHHOUSE 00001148 374922 9392422 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 954.19 394900 6/25/2016 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 78.74 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005468 374926 102364 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 78.74 394901 6/26/2015 136690 WESTERFIELD, DENISE 155.00 THEATER CAMP 375145 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC 155.00 394902 6/25/2015 136575 WESTLUND, JOHN 25.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 374750 AUDREY 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 25.00 394903 6/25/2015 127990 WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER 165.00 8699 OUTREACH PROGRAM 375118 PUPPET SHOW 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 165.00 10215 OUTREACH PROGRAM 375118 PUPPET SHOW 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 330.00 394904 6/25/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,897.52 375013 7034965 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 153.07 375011 7034967 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 98.73 375015 7034968 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,885.52 375012 7034970 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE • 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page - 29 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CLUB HOUSE YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARKADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394904 6/25/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 4,112.81 375014 7034971 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,147.65 394905 6/25/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 986.14 375019 1080336676 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,674.16 375023 1080336677 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,381.97 375018 1080336678 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 96.15 375017 1080336679 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,092.94 375016 1080336681 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,497.15 375020 1080336682 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.15 375021 1080336683 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,984.44 375022 1080336704 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15,786.10 394906 6/25/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 7,032.35 374769 1090420005 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 246.00 374768 1090420006 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 411.80 375119 1090420010 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,201.40 374770 1090420285 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,654.45 375025 1090420520 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 138.45 375024 1090420551 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13, 684.45 394907 6/25/2015 136348 WORKPLACE DYNAMICS LLC 3,285.00 BUSINESS INSIGHT PACKAGE 374740 7082435 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,285.00 394908 6/25/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 550.83 51-4197645-8 374732 459516370 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,226.89 51-6227619-3 375120 459917949 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,777.72 394909 6/25/2015 103226 YEADON FABRIC DOMES LLC 32,000.00 BRAEMAR FIELD PROJECT 374927 US16024 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 32,000.00 394910 6/25/2015 101091 ZIEGLER INC 74.72 FILTER ASSEMBLIES 00005381 374733 PCO01673048 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 74.72 40 is 0 • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/25/2015 — 6/25/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 394911 6/26/2016 102960 ZUHRAH SHRINE FLAMES 100.00 . CL PERFORMANCE 7/1/15 375146 062315 5760.6136 100.00 4,011,408.98 Grand Total Subledger Account Description Continued... PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,966, 508.23 A/P ACH Payment 2,044,900.75 Total Payments 4,011,408.98 is 6/24/2015 8:30:23 Page - 31 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/25/2015 - 6/25/2015 Company Amount " 01000 GENERAL FUND 148,189.55 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 393.22 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 159,768.38 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,603.82 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,217,918.50 04500 CANDO FUND 21,205.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,071.80 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,616.50 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 11,526.28 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 37,072.12 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 11,836.68 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 32,315.96 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 7,970.89 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 6,502.56 05800 LIQUOR FUND 170,578.54 05900 UTILITY FUND 1,360,665.24 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 722,837.64 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,997.26 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 91,676.44 09234 GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT 1,890.00 09240 PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT 105.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,667.60 Report Totals 4,011,408.98 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures date �f �rciGS�� :ne,ctor n er 0 0 6/24/2015 8:30:31 Page - 1 is • VERNON SELLING 100575 ALL SAFE INC. • COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX R55CKR2 LOGIS101 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 31.25 CITY OF EDINA 375838 138486 5311.6180 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 1578 7/2/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1576 7/2/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 376.12 60.80 375707 1896510 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 99.80 375705 1900094 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX MULCH 88.80 375706 1900100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 178.50 96.80 375787 1903080 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1580 7/2/2015 50.40 375788 1903083 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 54.40 375963 1903540 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1677 7/2/2015 VERNON SELLING 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 31.25 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 375838 138486 5311.6180 31.25 1578 7/2/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 376.12 COFFEE 375760 1183207 1550.6406 376.12 1579 7/2/2015 100638 BACHMAN'S 178.50 MULCH 375162 872950/50 5422.6541 178.50 1580 7/2/2015 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 1,139.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 375846 23270354.00-216 5960.6103 1,691.00 WATER RES GIS MAPPING 375845 23271068.00-20 5924.6103 7,186.24 ERF GRANT APPLICATION 375844 23271309.02-4 01251.1705.21 10, 016.24 1581 7/2/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,948.40 375611 48769500 5862.5512 36.55 375967 48892600 5822.5515 36.55 375968 48892700 5862.5515 203.05 375793 48892800 5862.5512 158.97 375612 92171400 5842.5515 185.70 375969 92252200 5862.5515 2,569.22 1682 7/2/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 164.25- RETURN 375710 CP -OE -394710-1 1628.6513 47.80 CUSTOM STAMPS 375243 IN -34418 1400.6406 208.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 375709 OE -394710-1 1628.6513 62.34 TISSUE, PENS 00003174 375242 WO -123168-1 1400.6513 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANTINGS & TREES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING INSPECTION • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 1 Business Unit YUKK JtLLINU YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING POOL OPERATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM ENGINEER SERVICES -WATER A-251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9,729.25 1589 7/2/2015 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 0 0 0 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 -- 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1582 7/2/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued... 96.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 375166 WO -125015-1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 33.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 375165 WO -125051-1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 55.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003178 375762 WO -125506-1 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 191.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003178 375762 WO -125506-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 531.32 1583 7/2/2015 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 1,284.97 SHREDDER 375167 109143 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003614 375763 109459 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,425.54 1584 7/2/2015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 43.41 SURFACE CASE 00004347 375169 WD24888 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 43.41 1585 7/2/2015 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 535.34 XCEL FOR LIFT STATION 375858 6211 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 259.63 XCEL FOR LIFT STATION 00001216 375714 6213 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 794.97 1586 7/2/2015 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO - 298,20 375794 190441 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 298.20 1587 7/2/2015 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 456.48 CLEAN PARKING RAMP STAIRS 375941 7070214585 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 456.48 1588 7/2/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,120.75 375627 807344 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 152.00 375626 807469 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 791.05 375970 808536 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 68.40 375971 606537 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,331.45 375622 808538 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 98.40 375623 808539 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,964.20 375625 808540 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 203.00 375624 808541 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 9,729.25 1589 7/2/2015 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 0 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1589 7/2/2015 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC Continued... 576.00 CARAMEL CORN 375863 2021 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 576.00 1590 7/2/2015 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 3,693.00 MANHOLES, GATE VALVE RINGS 00005286 375866 UU3545 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,693.00 1591 7/2/2015 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 37,439.48 MAY 2015 LODGING TAX 375267 062415 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 37,439.48 1592 7/2/2015 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 165.58 AD FOR BID 375869 742236511 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 169.94 AD FOR BID 375870 742249544 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 335.52 1593 7/2/2015 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 375871 2466220 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 1594 7/2/2015 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 44.74 375628 12412 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.74 1595 7/2/2015 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 2,579.47 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 375873 48074 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 2,579.47 1596 7/2/2015 124541 GEYEN GROUP 133.59 CARPET CLEANING 375875 24698 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 133.59 1597 7/2/2015 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 4,295.00 WATERLINE REPAIR 00002500 375186 14182 05557.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Valley View Rd 4,295.00 1598 7/2/2015 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 3,638.41 MAIL JUNE BILLS 375188 103304 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,638.41 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 4 Business Unit Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON SELLING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL STREET NAME SIGNS TREES & MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIELD MAINTENANCE PSTF FIRE TOWER CITY OF EDINA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1599 7/2/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. Continued... 47.06 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001245 375882 926562 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 47.06 1600 7/2/2015 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES 218.00 REFRIGERATOR REPAIR 375886 2277 05553.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 218.00 1601 7/2/2015 101792 LUBE -TECH 657.50 OIL, CLEAN OUT 00006354 375194 641508 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 40.00- DRUM RETURN 375195 642011 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 617.50 1602 7/2/2015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 954.19 375991 197925 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 954.19 1603 7/2/2015 101483 MENARDS 67.29 SHOW SUPPLIES 00008042 375889 84422 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 13.99 GRILL COVER 375285 86371 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 83.76 GLOVES, MAILBOX 00006356 375197 87723 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 347.88 MOWERS 00006360 375198 88308 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 80.81 GYPSUM, FOAM ,SCREWS 00001194 375200 88836 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 46.59 JACK STAND, CORD REEL STAND 00001195 375199 88868 1325.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 206.48 SPRAYERS, PRUNERS, SHOVELS 00001244 375286 89270 1644.6556 TOOLS 385.38 SDS DRILL, BITS, CHISELS 00001258 375738 89377 1646.6556 TOOLS 22.17 PLYWOOD 375890 89495 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,254.35 1604 7/212015 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 80.48 AC PARTS 00001166 375741 1433477-00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 80.48 1605 7/2/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 56.47 SPRINGS 00006359 375203 1016832-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 81.98 FILTERS 00006361 375204 1017674-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 117.52 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001241 375744 1019122-00 1642.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 255.97 1606 7/2/2015 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 99.75 STEEL 375207 320969 7413.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES • 0 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 4 Business Unit Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON SELLING ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL STREET NAME SIGNS TREES & MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIELD MAINTENANCE PSTF FIRE TOWER 40 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 5 i Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF DOME PROGRAM PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONTINGENCIES ARENA ICE MAINT CLUB HOUSE INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1606 7/2/2015 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY Continued... 111.50 STEELTUBE 00005389 375209 321598 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 252.00 STEEL PLATE, STRIPS 00005389 375208 321599 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 463.25 1607 7/2/2015 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 180.20 BACKUP GENERATOR REPAIR 375213 62601 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 180.20 1608 7/2/2015 129485 PAPCO INC. 131.36 FOAM SOAP, CLEANERS 375294 93454 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 131.36 1609 71212015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 921.79 TISSUE, LINERS, TOWELS 00002021 375780 7987 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 173.13 SOAP, SQUEEGEES 00002021 375781 7996 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1,094.92 1610 7/2/2015 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 366.81 EVIDENCE ROOM CARD READER 375300 69588 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 366.81 1611 7/2/2015 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 702.18 ZAMBONI REPAIR 375907 0057409 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 702.18 1612 7/2/2015 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 3,554.96 WATER HEATER REPLACEMENTS 375217 65913 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,554.96 1613 7/2/2015 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 195.58 AERATOR SHELTER SUPPLIES 00001136 375956 41305195 5937.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.34 STAKES 00001169 375219 41307774 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 305.92 1614 7/2/2015 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 2,400.00 SCADA PROGRAMMING 375750 1529 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,400.00 1615 7/2/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 784.49 PIPE, ENDS, LABOR 00005408 375223 53090750.3001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 40 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 5 i Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF DOME PROGRAM PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONTINGENCIES ARENA ICE MAINT CLUB HOUSE INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 -- 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1615 7/2/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES Continued... 72.20 PIPE, ENDS 00005408 375224 S3096642.001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 677.55 PIPE 00001189 375222 S3099457.00 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,534.24 1616 712/2015 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 376.60 GATE REPAIRS 00001255 375913 29343 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 376.60 1617 7/2/2015 101015 STREICHERS 12.99 SOCKS 375305 11154782 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.99 SOCKS 375304 11154903 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 67.98 SQUAD SEAT ORGANIZER 375958 11154955 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 2,000.00 AMMO 00003172 375306 11155032 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,093.96 1618 7/2/2015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 43.89 WIRE 00005435 375751 86183 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.89 1619 7/2/2015 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 2,412.70 LIQUID FERTILIZER 375226 8475-R 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,412.70 1620 7/2/2016 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2,679.39 BRIDGE REPAIRS 375918 002015001507 1346.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 2,679.39 1621 7/2/2015 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 493.11 PITMAN ARM 00005347 375231 E189377B 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 493.11 1622 7/2/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 106.50- 376003 0115726 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 18.00 375665 0126888 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 266.75 375665 0126888 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 276.00 376002 0126889 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 362.50 375829 0127391 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 816.75 1623 7/2/2015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION • 0 0 0 375669 395959-00 5842.5513 9 YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 375668 396247-00 5822.5513 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING 992.50 375666 396255-00 5862.5513 Council Check Register by GL VERNON SELLING 864.50 375830 396775-00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary YORK SELLING 2,680.05 375667 396877-00 5862.5513 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1623 7/2/2015 395.00 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION Continued... 394915 42.43- 375930 42341147 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 32.42- 375929 42361580 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 34288 88.86 CONCESSION PRODUCT 375927 42803865 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 375757 908.16 5765.6180 375928 42803866 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 922.17 394916 7/2/2015 1624 7/2/2015 129458 ACME TOOLS 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 0 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 7 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS 96.00- 375669 395959-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 743.55 375668 396247-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 992.50 375666 396255-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 864.50 375830 396775-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,680.05 375667 396877-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 394912 7/2/2015 101833 A.T.O.M. 350.00 TRAINING 375237 1606923-7724607 1400.6104 5 394913 7/2/2015 LICENSES & PERMITS 100613 AAA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 6,757.97 FOR NEW VAC -CON 375703 TITLE/PLATE 1553.6260 6,757.97 394914 7/2/2015 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 395.00 DRIVING CLASSES 375704 062015 1628.6103 395.00 394915 7/2/2015 105075 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. 427.08 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00002019 375756 34288 5761.6180 297.65 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00002018 375757 34289 5765.6180 724.73 394916 7/2/2015 129458 ACME TOOLS 500.00 GREASE GUN, SAW 00005349 375160 3462717 1553.6585 500.00 394917 7/2/2015 132214 ACTION FENCE INC. 56,810.00 SPORTS NETTING/CHAIN LINK 375701 G702 47090.6710 56, 810.00 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE EXPENSES ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394918 7/2/2015 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC. Continued... 250.00 CLOCK INSTALLATION 375837 38375 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 250.00 394919 7/2/2015 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 82.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 375238 062315 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 IAFCI MEMBERSHIP 375758 062615 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 232.94 394920 7/2/2015 136618 ANCHOR BUILDERS 1,640.00 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 375239 5605 MCGUIRE 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1,640.00 394921 7/2/2015 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 599.72 COPIER PAPER 375161 10439467-00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 599.72 394922 7/2/2015 136612 ANDERSON, ROMAN A 1,482.80 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375240 062215 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,482.80 394923 7/2/2015 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 1,499.23 CONCESSION PRODUCT 375839 506220172 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,499.23 394924 7/2/2015 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 538.55 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIR 375840 71178 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 538.55 394925 7/2/2015 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 485.57 ACID, SODA BICARB 375841 43673 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 485.57 394926 7/2/2015 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 172.35 CARPET BASE 00001145 375842 10071402 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 172.35 394927 7/2/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 775.95 375610 3038013 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 208.00 375609 3038014 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 776.50 375608 3038016 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 0 ie 0 • CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 116.42 • GENERAL SUPPLIES • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 7/2/2015 ARENA CONCESSIONS CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/30/2015 10:59:44 620.00 Council Check Register by GL 375843 Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 394930 7/2/2015 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394927 7/2/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 79.92 Continued... 394931 508.00 375790 3039256 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 844.00 375791 3039257 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,137.50 375964 3039258 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 394932 1,496.00 375789 3039259 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,205.25 375792 3039260 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 12.72- 375965 317462 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 394928 7/2/2015 136668 BALDWIN, MARGARET 116.42 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375761 5517 BENTON AVE 5900.2015 5511.6180 1400.6406 5862.5514 CUSTOMER REFUND CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 116.42 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 394929 7/2/2015 ARENA CONCESSIONS 104345 BARCLAYAUDIO GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 620.00 MUSIC SYSTEM REPAIR 375843 ICEARENA 620.00 394930 7/2/2015 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 79.92 BATTERIES 00003166 375163 018-371752 79.92 394931 7/2/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 383.00 375966 2322 383.00 394932 7/2/2015 126996 BCA - CJTE 285.00 DMT CERTIFICATION 375241 32646 285.00 394933 7/2/2015 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 100.00 TOOTSIE POPS FOR PARADE 375708 062415 100.00 394935 7/2/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 258.00 COFFEE 375851 T116992 86.95 COFFEE 375164 T80447 344.95 394936 7/2/2015 125209 BISEK, KATIE 131.10 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375244 062315 131.10 5511.6180 1400.6406 5862.5514 CUSTOMER REFUND CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 559.50 I CITY OF EDINA 127255 5822.5513 559.50 Council Check Register by GL 394942 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 131594 BOWMAC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC. 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 600.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394936 7/2/2015 125209 BISEK, KATIE Continued... 394937 7/2/2015 136660 BRAXTON & SONS INC. 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 318.80 00009409 375246 167818 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 47090.6710 123.76 00009411 375247 168206 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 109.37 7/2/2015 375248 169374 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 603.05 ART SUPPLIES 00009407 375245 4444957 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 375852 REFUND 1,154.98 5401.4553 500.00 394938 7/2/2015 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 394945 7/2/2015 374.03 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375249 JOAN ROHLF 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 374.03 375854 1002385387 394939 7/2/2015 136609 BLUE PEARL VETERINARY PARTNERS GOLF BALLS 375853 1002385711 5440.5511 1,437.75 K9 BLITZ EXAM 375250 430493 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,437.75 • 394940 7/2/2015 • 136671 BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 378.00 TOWAMBULANCE 375764 498201 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 378.00 394941 7/2/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 10 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING EDUCATION PROGRAMS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CLUBHOUSE PSTF ADMINISTRATION PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF GOLF REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 0 559.50 375617 127255 5822.5513 559.50 394942 7/2/2015 131594 BOWMAC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES INC. 600.00 SIMULATOR SHIPPING - IR COURSE 375168 17 7410.6218 600.00 394943 7/2/2015 136660 BRAXTON & SONS INC. 14,440.00 ROUGH CARPENTRY 375698 1 47090.6710 14,440.00 394944 7/2/2015 136673 BRAZIL, ANN 500.00 BRAEMAR RENTAL 375852 REFUND 5401.4553 500.00 394945 7/2/2015 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 579.60 375854 1002385387 5440.5511 1,127.89 GOLF BALLS 375853 1002385711 5440.5511 1,707.49 • • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 10 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING EDUCATION PROGRAMS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CLUBHOUSE PSTF ADMINISTRATION PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF GOLF REVENUES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394945 7/2/2015 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. Continued... 394946 7/2/2015 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 249.00 WINDOW REPAIR 375711 528673S 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 249.00 394947 7/2/2015 136665 BRUCE, DAVID 1,191.88 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375712 7727 TANGLEWOOD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1,191.88 394948 7/2/2015 122074 BUIE, BARB 20.33 375765 062215 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 64.13 375765 062215 5760.6235 POSTAGE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 84.46 394949 7/2/2015 121518 BUSHNELL INC. 408.67 RANGEFINDERS 00006413 375855 842075 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 408.67 394950 7/2/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 785.45 375618 616263 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 288.50 375620 616903 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8,797.90 375619 617096 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,871.85 394951 7/2/2015 131507 CASSERLY, ROBERT 27.64 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 306627 011713 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 27.64 394952 7/2/2015 136669 CAVALLETTI, MARCO 197.11 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375766 7204 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GLOUCHESTER 197.11 394953 7/2/2015 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 95.21 10437426-9 375257 10437426-6/15 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 536.24 5563827-4 375254 5563827-6/15 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 360.16 5584304-9 375251 5564304-6/15 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 17.90 5584310-6 375253 5584310-6/15 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 83.07 5590919-6 375252 5590919-6/15 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 57.45 5596524-8 375939 5596524-6/15 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394953 7/2/2015 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 307.95 8034001-1 375255 8034001-6/15 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 755.63 9724639-1 375256 9724639-6/15 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,213.61 394954 7/2/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 98.91 612 E77-0056 375258 0056-6/15 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 104.90 612 E23-0652 375259 0652-6/15 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 203.81 394955 7/2/2015 136836 CENTURYLINK 1,335.45 612-D08-2053-053 375260 2053-6/15 2310.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES E911 1,335.45 394966 7/2/2016 136663 CERTIFIED MORTGAGE INVESTORS CO. 211.25 FINALEDACCT-REFUND 375713 320ADAMSAVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 211.25 394957 7/2/2015 102123 CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES, THE 479.24 APPAREL 375856 PSI -267386 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 479.24 394958 7/2/2015 136676 CITY HOMES DEVELOPMENT LLC 1,308.99 SANITARY STRUCTURE INSTALL 375935 ACRES DUBOIS 01260.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A260 ACRES DUBOIS 1,308.99 394959 7/2/2015 103040 CITY PAGES 90.00 4TH OF JULYAD 375857 129815 1130.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 90.00 394960 7/2/2015 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 344.04 375621 0188156022 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 344.04 394961 7/2/2015 121131 COLE, DAWN 69.00 JR LEAGUE CANCELATION 375940 REFUND 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 69.00 394962 7/2/2015 120433 COMCAST 6.76 8772 10 614 0373022 375715 373022-6/15 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.76 0 0 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394962 7/2/2015 120433 COMCAST Continued... 394963 7/2/2015 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 56,388.76 HOT MIX 375261 061515 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 56,388.76 394964 7/2/2015 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 352.00 MORTAR 00001190 375170 0127415 -IN 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 352.00 394965 7/2/2015 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 3,266.10 UNIFORMS 375861 38219 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 400.79 UNIFORMS 375860 38573 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 128.95 UNIFORM S 375859 38743 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,795.84 394966 7/2/2015 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 72.00 MAY 2015 WASHES 375262 429521 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.00 394967 7/2/2015 123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE & BRICK PAVING INC. 5,880.00 WORK ON VETERANS MEMORIAL 375767 VET MEM 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 5,880.00 394968 7/2/2015 102696 CROWN TROPHY 13.89 PLATE ENGRAVING 375862 6296 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 13.89 394969 7/2/2015 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 223.75 114-10014090-3 375263 53115 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 223.75 394970 7/2/2015 100130 DAKOTA COUNTY 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 375942 062915 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 394971 7/2/2015 126863 DECESARE, COSETTE 62.00 SIGNED UP TWICE 375264 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 62.00 394972 7/2/2015 121103 DIRECTV is • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 14 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PACS IS PLANNING COMMUNICATIONS POLICE EQUIPMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER 0 CITY OF EDINA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394972 7/2/2015 121103 DIRECTV Continued... 84.15 TV 375171 26024627076 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 84.15 394973 7/2/2015 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONSTRUCT LLC 34,356.75 CONCRETE & MASONRY 375697 1-14520-0137 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 34,356.75 394974 7/2/2015 124438 DONNAY HOMES 247.71 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375266 5920 CHOWEN AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 247.71 394975 7/2/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 327.50 STREET SMARTS AD 375864 222319 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 327.50 394976 7/2/2015 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 32.00 HERITAGE AWARD PLAQUE 375716 94389 1140.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 32.00 394977 7/2/2015 124000 EIDSNESS, KAYLIN 142.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 376007 062915 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 142.60 394978 7/2/2015 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 462.73 COMPUTER MOUNTS 375717 AW052615-6 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 462.73 394979 7/2/2015 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 3,202.08 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003521 375768 1746155 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 205.96 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003521 375769 1746477 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 113.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003521 375770 1747173 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 3,521.94 394980 7/2/2015 136680 ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS LLC 2,401.00 DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIRS 375865 43350 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,401.00 394981 7/2/2015 136662 EVERSON, LENORE 140.60 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIR 375718 REIMBURSE 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 140.60 is • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 14 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PACS IS PLANNING COMMUNICATIONS POLICE EQUIPMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL STORM SEWER 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394981 7/2/2015 136662 EVERSON, LENORE Continued... 394982 7/2/2015 136674 EVERSON, MARY 149.00 JR LEAGUE CANCELATION 375867 REFUND 5401.4591 GREEN FEES EIGHTEEN HOLES GOLF REVENUES 149.00 394983 7/2/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 317.82 BRAKE KIT, ROTOR ASSEMBLIES 375172 1-4723465 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 214.84 ROTORASSEMBLIES 375174 14724649 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 298.02 BATTERIES 375175 1-4725673 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.44 NEUTRAL SAFETY 375721 1-4726606 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 202.97 STARTER MOTOR ASSEMBLY 375720 1-4726988 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.94 BATTERY 375722 1-4728789 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.25 BATTERY 375176 1-Z04707 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.10 TEFLON BLADES 375719 2-3954401 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 149.01 BATTERY 375173 69-182648 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,626.39 394984 7/2/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,061.70 METER COUPLINGS 00001213 375177 0143869 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 42.65 HYDRAULIC WRENCH, OIL 00001170 375178 0143884 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 23.60 SAFETY VESTS 00001219 375868 0144347 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,127.95 394985 7/2/2015 119211 FIRSTLAB 342.65 DRUG TESTS 375179 FL00122756 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 342.65 394986 7/2/2015 131188 FIRST -SHRED 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 375268 150543 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.80 375269 151824 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.60 394987 7/2/2015 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 1,100.00 CLEAN WINDOWS, SKYLIGHTS 375180 2315-10606 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,100.00 394988 7/2/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 77.43 ACCT 0039263 375872 1013158258 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 77.43 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 394989 7/2/2015 119567 GARELICK STEEL CO INC Continued... 197.50 STEEL 00005429 375181 321838 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.50 394990 7/2/2015 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 834.99 JACKETS 375874 40984065 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 834.99 394991 7/2/2015 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC 1,906.87 375877 136325 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 770.21 START UP BOILERS 375876 136326 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 2,677.08 394992 7/2/2015 101103 GRAINGER 72.11 DUCT TAPE 00006364 375182 9764528312 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 35.48 ICE PACKS 00001174 375271 9765377792 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 314.88 EAR PLUGS 00001180 375270 9766563804 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 82.56 GLOVES 00001199 375183 9769950768 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 505.03 394993 7/2/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 92.25 375795 183335 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92.25 394994 7/2/2015 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 330.51 IRRIGATION START UP 00001214 375272 152327 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 330.51 394995 7/2/2015 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 372.05 BALL MARKERS, TEES 375878 55002 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 372.05 394996 7/2/2015 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 10,000.00 QTRLY PAYMENT 375879 #003 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10, 000.00 394997 7/2/2016 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 33.78 375943 BLM0177604 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 33.78- 375944 BLM0177654 5841.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 33.04 DRIVE BELTS 00005415 375945 BLM0179293 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 34.41 DRIVE BELTS 00005415 375946 PKE0251600 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 0 0 0 • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 17 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS 4,174.96 CHEMICALS 00005285 375184 3739652 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,372.53 CHLORINE, SODIUM HYDROX 375880 3740802 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 5,547.49 395000 7/2/2015 136683 HAWKINSON, SUSAN J 20.73 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375947 6420 JOSEPHINE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 395001 s COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100012 • 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 L-5101 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA 1,284.80 PIPE, COVERS 00001175 375185 E060249 5932.6406 Council Check Register by GL 1,284.80 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 395002 7/2/2015 106371 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 394997 7/2/2015 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 395.00 Continued... 67.45 395003 7/2/2015 394998 7/2/2015 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 936.00 REIMBURSE FOR SOFTBALLS 375771 1873 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL 1000061935 1195.6225 936.00 2,244.25 394999 7/2/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 395004 7/2/2015 • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 17 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS 4,174.96 CHEMICALS 00005285 375184 3739652 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,372.53 CHLORINE, SODIUM HYDROX 375880 3740802 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 5,547.49 395000 7/2/2015 136683 HAWKINSON, SUSAN J 20.73 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375947 6420 JOSEPHINE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 395001 7/2/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,284.80 PIPE, COVERS 00001175 375185 E060249 5932.6406 1,284.80 395002 7/2/2015 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 395.00 TEMPO COURSE 375273 39951 1400.6104 395.00 395003 7/2/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,244.25 MAY 2015 ROOM & BOARD 375723 1000061935 1195.6225 2,244.25 395004 7/2/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 698.00 375632 767841 5822.5514 1,747.50 375629 769097 5862.5514 704.13 375972 769120 5822.5514 2,221.00 375630 769444 5842.5514 87.00 375631 769445 5842.5515 5,457.63 395006 7/2/2015 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 32.86 TOOLS 375187 9014799 1301.6556 32.86 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS BOARD & ROOM PRISONER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GENERAL STORM SEWER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 7/2/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 590.00 Council Check Register by GL 375796 30227 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 395010 7/212015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 395006 7/2/2016 375274 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 1400.6104 Continued... 225.00 382.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375724 062315 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 382.38 395007 7/2/2015 7/2/2015 136679 HOULE, RACHEL 119808 INTEGRA 198.47 HAD ALREADY BEEN PURCHASED 375881 REFUND 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS 13070126 198.47 27.74 395008 7/2/2015 136681 HUHDANPAA, HANNU 395012 7/2/2015 136682 ISAACSON, MICHELE 165.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375948 5149 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 155.76 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375949 6424 TINGDALE 5900.2015 ABERCROMBIE DR 395009 7/2/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 590.00 VERNON SELLING 375796 30227 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 590.00 395010 7/2/2015 130866 INFORMATION POLICY ANALYSIS 225.00 DATA PRACTICES WORKSHOP 375274 282636 1400.6104 225.00 TRAINING 375772 282661 1470.6104 450.00 395011 7/2/2015 119808 INTEGRA 27.74 ISP BUNDLE 375189 13070126 7411.6188 27.74 395012 7/2/2015 136682 ISAACSON, MICHELE 155.76 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375949 6424 TINGDALE 5900.2015 AVE 155.76 395013 7/2/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 176.00- 375974 2360771 5842.5514 44.00- 375797 2360841 5862.5514 2,114.70 375636 2368172 5822.5514 21.50 375635 2368173 5822.5515 13,066.70 375798 2382207 5862.5514 41.80 375799 2382208 5862.5515 3,040.55 375634 2382210 5822.5514 17.55 375633 2382211 5822.5515 8,917.03 375800 2382219 5842.5514 • 0 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 18 Business Unit TREES & MAINTENANCE AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE CUSTOMER REFUND PSTF OCCUPANCY UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 -- 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395013 7/2/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 77.85 375801 2382220 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 338.00 375973 2382239 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 452.20 375883 2388833 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 27,867.88 395014 7/2/2015 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 153.90 TURF PAINT 00006355 375190 72062295 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 357.86 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001176 375276 72186038 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 6.16 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001176 375275 72187693 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 517.92 395015 7/2/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,329.38 375639 5188900 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 295.14 375637 5188906 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 626.56 375638 5188908 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3.48 375640 5188913 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,327.73 375802 5188922 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .58 375976 5194388 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3.48 375982 5194390 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 103.94 375805 5194394 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 626.25 375804 5194395 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 135.25 375981 5194397 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 92.66 375803 5194399 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 375811 5194400 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,075.92 375977 5194402 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,107.50 375983 5194403 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 2,319.48 375984 5194405 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 89.66 375978 5194407 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 33.16 375979 5194408 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,063.10 375985 5194409 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 581.77 375980 5194412 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 50.32 375975 5194413 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,264.94 375812 5194414 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,248.60 375807 5194415 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21.99 375808 5194416 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE VERNON SELLING 488.67 375814 5194417 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 25.16 375809 5194418 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,429.15 375806 5194420 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 31.41 375813 5194422 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,651.32 375810 5194423 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395015 7/2/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 51.16- 375642 529762 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 73.16- 375643 529763 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 29.62- 375641 530037 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 241.16- 375644 530346 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.32- 375987 531014 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.34- 375989 531015 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.67- 375990 531016 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 100.00- 375988 531017 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.68- 375986 531018 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34,475.65 395016 7/2/2015 136613 JPS HOMES LLC 100.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375277 5308 WHITING 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 100.00 395017 7/2/2015 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 576.46 FLANGE BEARINGS 00005422 375725 B306523 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 236.52 BOLT FLANGES 00005422 375726 0828158 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 812.98 395018 7/2/2015 130789 KATZ, DAVID 172.00 WEBSITE STORIES 375884 210 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 172.00 395019 7/2/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 325.55 00003556 375775 268163-04 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20.38 00003556 375776 268647-06 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 603.96 UNIFORMS 00003609 375773 278836-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.00 00003608 375774 279373 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 959.89 395020 7/2/2015 113212 KEN DELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 24.30 KEYS 00001187 375278 S1020396 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 24.30 395021 7/2/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 3,895.00 50TH/FRANCE PROJECT 375279 6776546 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 3,895.00 0 • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 21 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES INSPECTIONS PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAVEMENT MARKINGS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS Asset Mgmt Software and Equip Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 395022 7/2/2015 136677 KNUDSON, MEGAN Continued... 80.00 ART CLASS 16847 375885 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 80.00 395023 7/2/2015 100845 KREMER SERVICES LLC 96.00 UBOLTS, WASHERS, NUTS 00005433 375191 38575 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 96.00 395024 7/2/2015 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 47.50 LOGO CLOTHING 375727 SIN2796989 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 215.00 UNIFORMS 375887 SIN2898295 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 262.50 395025 7/2/2015 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 15,093.00 LANDPRIDE MOWER 00001790 375280 01-281923 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15, 093.00 395026 7/2/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 397.98 CUT OFF WHEELS, BITS 00005386 375192 9303346285 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 136.99 RIVETS 00005304 375281 9303356237 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 163.29 HOSE, FITTINGS 00005350 375728 9303356998 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 698.26 395027 7/2/2015 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 113.34 PATROL SUBSCRIPTION 375282 218409 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 113.34 395028 7/2/2015 136616 LEGKY, TONY 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 375283 320 ADAMS 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 395029 7/2/2015 100558 LIND ELECTRONIC DESIGN CO INC. 199.90 POWER SUPPLIES 00004351 375193 304913 4614.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 399.80 POWER SUPPLIES 00004351 375193 304913 4615.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 599.70 395030 712/2015 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 107.82 HOLSTER 375729 061815 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 413.47 EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT 375730 USSS 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 521.29 • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 21 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES INSPECTIONS PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PAVEMENT MARKINGS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS Asset Mgmt Software and Equip Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 -- 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395031 7/2/2015 114593 MAAP Continued... 95.00 WORKSHOP - MITZI WICKLUND 375284 8/07/15 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 95.00 395032 7/2/2015 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 339.28 GENERATOR FUEL 375731 566007 1553.6561 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 414.29 375732 566008 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 371.43 375733 566009 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 350.01 375734 566010 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 356.42 375735 566011 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 161.03 375736 566012 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 482.14 375737 566013 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,474.60 395033 7/2/2015 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 280.00 EDITING & HOSTING 375888 208 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 280.00 395034 7/212015 122564 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 206.04 OXYGEN 00003649 375777 11497681 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 206.04 395035 712/2015 113023 MEGGITT TRAINING SYSTEMS INC. 144.26 REPAIRS AT RANGE 375196 INV -0067290 7412.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF RANGE 144.26 395036 7/2/2015 130324 MENSAH, ERIC 50.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 289083 053012 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 395037 7/2/2016 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 275.00 STEPASSEMBLY 00005432 375740 494075 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.75 FLOOR MATS 00005348 375739 494086 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.24- CREDIT 375950 CM494019 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 288.51 395038 7/2/2016 104650 MICRO CENTER 131.96 IT SUPPLIES 00004350 375201 5625530 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 131.96 395039 7/2/2015 136279 MIDNIGHT IN MOSCOW 0 0 0 0 • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395039 7/2/2015 136279 MIDNIGHT IN MOSCOW Continued... 250.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 375936 062915 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA 250.00 395040 7/2/2015 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 157.61 POSTCARD MAILING 375891 74584 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 157.61 395041 7/2/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,000.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002507 375287 34987 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 3,425.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002507 375287 34987 03487.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 5,425.00 395042 7/2/2015 127320 MINNESOTA CIT OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION 1,875.00 3 CIT CLASSES 375288 201500611 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,250.00 2 CIT CLASSES 375289 201500612 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,125.00 395043 7/2/2015 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 19.37 FILLER CAP 00001177 375742 P79774 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 19.37 395044 7/2/2015 120604 MINT CONDITION DETAILING INC. 405.00 COMPLETE CLEAN, REMOVE DECALS 375743 46825 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 405.00 395045 7/2/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 49.00 STREET SMART POSTERS 375892 17474 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 179.00 BIKE RACKS POSTCARDS 375893 17829 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 49.00 FRISBEE POSTERS 375894 17858 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 105.00 POSTCARDS, POSTERS 375291 17884 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 51.00 NEWSLETTERS 375202 17905 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 STREET SMARTS POSTERS 375895 17906 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 482.00 395046 7/2/2015 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 1,635.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT 375290 78304062 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 1,635.12 395047 7/2/2015 101658 MPELRA 250.00 LISA SCHAEFER 375896 AUG 6 - 7 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395047 7/2/2015 101658 MPELRA Continued... 350.00 CASSI MCMAYER 375896 AUG 5-7 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES 600.00 395048 7/2/2015 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 2,472.85 MAGAZINEAD 375897 2015-41326 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,472.85 395049 7/2/2015 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 33,250.00 ELECTRICAL WORK 375700 3477 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 33,250.00 395050 7/2/2016 100916 MUZAK LLC 277.77 MUSIC SERVICES 375951 51725046 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES- 50TH ST SELLING 277.77 MUSIC SERVICES 375951 51725046 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 277.77 MUSIC SERVICES 375951 51725046 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 833.31 395051 7/2/2015 136099 NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC. 9,000.00 EDINA RESIDENT SURVEY 375898 5517 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 9,000.00 395052 7/2/2016 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 299.00 ART CENTER ADS 375292 752395 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 299.00 395053 7/2/2015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 324.50 375645 100863 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 275.00 375646 100864 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 599.50 395054 7/2/2015 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,779.00 SIGNS 00001133 375205 TI -0286945 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 809.85 SIGN FILM 00001133 375206 TI -0286982 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 2,588.85 395056 7/2/2015 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 1,582.14 EMERGENCY LIGHTS 00005426 375745 39047 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,582.14 395056 7/2/2015 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 0 0 0 0 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 25 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION MUSIC IN EDINA CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP CENT SVC PW BUILDING PARKING RAMP Arden Park D Reconstruction Arden Park D Reconstruction POLICE EQUIPMENT WARDEN AVE HAWKES NHOOD RECON WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 395056 7/2/2015 103578 OFFICE DEPOT Continued... 39.21 SIGN HOLDERS 375900 1798626876 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128.97 DEPOSIT BAGS 375899 775823232001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 168.18 395057 7/2/2015 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 40.63 STEEL 00001191 375210 562188 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.63 395068 7/2/2015 134456 OMLIE, JAMES JOSEPH 50.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 375938 062615 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50.00 395059 7/2/2015 101659 ORKIN 144.35 PEST CONTROL 375293 103099979 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20.00 PEST CONTROL 375952 103105433 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 65.00 PEST CONTROL 375954 103105436 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.00 PEST CONTROL 375953 103105437 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 249.35 395060 7/2/2015 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 3,250.00 WATER LINE REPAIR 00002664 375211 3594 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,250.00 395061 7/2/2015 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 2,900.00 WATER LINE REPAIR 00002665 375212 3595 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2,900.00 395062 7/2/2015 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 329.00 WINDOW TINTING 375746 272600 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 329.00 395063 7/2/2015 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 1,807.63 BREDESEN PK/COUNTRYSIDE 375214 RECON 01408.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 4,122.87 BREDESEN PK/COUNTRYSIDE 375214 RECON 01407.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 13,026.91 BREDESEN PK/COUNTRYSIDE 375214 RECON 01409.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2,594.70 BREDESEN PK/COUNTRYSIDE 375214 RECON 05538.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 10,852.34 BREDESEN PK/COUNTRYSIDE 375214 RECON 03480.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 15,296.31 BREDESEN PK/COUNTRYSIDE 375214 RECON 04396.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 47,700.76 0 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 25 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION MUSIC IN EDINA CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP CENT SVC PW BUILDING PARKING RAMP Arden Park D Reconstruction Arden Park D Reconstruction POLICE EQUIPMENT WARDEN AVE HAWKES NHOOD RECON WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 395064 7/2/2015 395065 7/212015 395066 7/212015 395067 7/212015 395068 7/2/2015 395069 7/2/2015 395070 7/2/2015 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 135108 PAULE, MARISA Continued... 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 357874 111914 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 168.19 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 956.58 80.25- 1,947.07 323.59 672.20 150.28 150.28 4,119.75 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 375650 8503344 -IN 5822.5513 YORK SELLING 375653 8503615 -CM 5842.5513 116.72 375648 8504217 -IN 5842.5513 375902 375649 8504220 -IN 5822.5513 375647 8504223 -IN 5862.5513 43278635 375652 8504286 -IN 5822.5512 375651 8504287 -IN 5862.5512 5421.5510 552.60 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 375815 38446807 5862.5515 116.72 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 375902 43278604 5730.5510 509.36 375901 43278635 5520.5510 578.65 375903 43278638 5421.5510 525.69 375778 43278651 5761.5510 2,283.02 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 7,825.00 RESOD LAKE EDINA 00002645 375904 262 1261.6103 7,580.00 REMOVE CHIPS/ADD ROCK 375295 YORK PLAYGROUND 1642.6517 15,405.00 134341 PETERSON, PATRICIA 400.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 375937 062915 2611.6103 400.00 135849 PETSMART #2412 84.97 K9 FOOD 00003170 375296 T-2871 4607.6406 114.38 K9 FOOD, SUPPLIES 00003173 375297 T-6029 4607.6406 199.35 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 988.36 375657 2805739 5822.5513 414.44 375654 2805741 5822.5512 147.48 375656 2805742 5822.5513 230.80 375655 2805903 5822.5513 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page - 26 Business Unit ELECTION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAND GRAVEL & ROCK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FIELD MAINTENANCE MUSIC IN EDINA EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 0 0 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395070 7/2/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 157.60 375993 2809422 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .58 375818 2809423 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 99.48 375997 2809425 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 210.32 375992 2809426 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 80.16 375816 2809427 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,809.28 375822 2809428 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 375823 2809432 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 105.16 375820 2809433 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,743.89 375994 2809435 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 623.95 375996 2809436 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 706.56 375995 2809437 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,832.36 375819 2809440 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 47.75 375817 2809441 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,329.63 375821 2809442 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11, 528.96 395071 7/2/2015 130174 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1,180.00 FIELD PAINT 00001185 375298 INV557277 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,180.00 395072 7/2/2015 106071 PLAYWORKS GROUP 60.00 GROUPADMISSION REFUND 375905 062515 5701.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 60.00 395073 7/2/2015 136610 POLICE SERVICE DOGS INC. 350.00 K-9 TRAINING FLEX POLE 375299 20150619 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 350.00 395074 7/2/2015 136667 PRATT, RANDALL 24.77 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375779 6412 WEST SHORE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET OR 24.77 395075 7/2/2015 103094 PROTECTION ONE 190.95 ALARM MONITORING 375906 061415 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADM] N ISTRATI ON 190.95 395076 7/2/2015 120221 RACHEL CONTRACTING 144,097.90 EARTHWORK 375695 14045.6 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 144,097.90 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395076 7/2/2015 120221 RACHEL CONTRACTING Continued... 395077 7/2/2016 104642 RCM EQUIPMENT COMPANY LLC 4,244.00 BLOWER 375215 3365 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,216.81 SPRAY PATCHER PARTS 375216 3366 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9,460.81 395078 7/2/2015 136281 RISING, DALLAS 486.00 MODEL 375908 062615 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 486.00 396079 7/2/2015 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 24,753.81 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 375702 4520013703 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 24,753.81 395080 7/2/2015 135078 RMGA INC. 35,000.00 MASTER PLAN RETAINER 375955 1405-04 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 35,000.00 395081 7/2/2015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 120.88 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 375782 00316247 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 120.88 395082 7/2/2015 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 80.40 RECYCLE USED FILTERS 375218 67193305 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 80.40 395083 7/2/2015 132287 SALMEN,ANNE 38.00 SIGNED UP TWICE 375301 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 38.00 395084 7/2/2015 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 75.74 FOOD 375747 007715 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 71.24 ***' *"""' ***9 350 375748 062315 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 146.98 395085 7/2/2015 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 237.35 MINTS 375909 SH5014 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 178.25 PENS 375910 SH5015 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 415.60 0 0 0 5842.5514 395093 7/2/2015 136611 SONGSTAD, JOEL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107.72 CREDIT BAL REFUND R55CKR2 LOGIS101 5420 BENTON AVE 5900.2015 YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 6/30/2015 10:59:44 395094 7/2/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Council Check Register by GL Page- 29 4,696.25 375663 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 450.72 375664 1297455 5842.5512 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 375999 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395086 7/2/2015 128151 SCHERER BROS LUMBER 1298598 5842.5512 Continued... 4,457.86 375660 11,037.00 STRUCTURAL INSULATION PANELS 375699 1 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 1298600 5862.5513 11, 037.00 395087 7/2/2015 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 285.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 375957 062915 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 285.00 395088 7/2/2015 100995 SEH 1,372.49 GENERAL ENGR SERVICES 375911 298706 08060.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 1,116.97 ANTENNA PROJECTS 375220 299333 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 2,489.46 395089 7/2/2015 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 486.00 JUNE 2015 FEES 375912 062315 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 486.00 395090 7/2/2015 101926 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 50.00 SLUC TRAINING 375749 200001664 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 50.00 395091 7/2/2015 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 TRASH ROOM FLOOR CLEANING 375221 51631 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 1,650.00 395092 7/2/2015 136580 SOCIABLE CIDER WERKS LLC 5842.5514 395093 7/2/2015 136611 SONGSTAD, JOEL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 107.72 CREDIT BAL REFUND 375302 5420 BENTON AVE 5900.2015 YORK SELLING 107.72 VERNON SELLING 395094 7/2/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 4,696.25 375663 1296156 5822.5513 450.72 375664 1297455 5842.5512 2,548.86 375999 1298595 5822.5513 80.75 375662 1298596 5822.5513 1,805.16 375661 1298598 5842.5512 4,457.86 375660 1298599 5842.5513 8,406.00 375658 1298600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 -- 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395094 7/2/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 2,697.16 375659 1298601 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .75 376000 1299983 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 128.25 375998 1299984 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 126.00- 376001 9059295 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 25,145.76 396096 7/2/2016 134700 SPOK INC. 107.40 PAGERS 375303 Y0319246F 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 107.40 395096 7/2/2015 136666 ST SERVICES INC. OF BUFFALO 3,645.00 SEEDING AT VETERANS MEMORIAL00002017 375783 2923 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 3,645.00 395097 7/2/2015 134976 STANDARD SIDEWALK INC. 4,090.15 VERNON, YORK, VALLEY VIEW 375960 IMPROVEMENTS 07119.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S119 YORKAVE SIDEWALK W SIDE 6,474.68 VERNON, YORK, VALLEY VIEW 375960 IMPROVEMENTS 07118.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S118 VERNON AVE SIDEWALK 6,541.97 VERNON, YORK, VALLEY VIEW 375960 IMPROVEMENTS 07123.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK 17,106.80 395098 7/2/2015 136198 STAFF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION INC. 7,187.70 CONCRETE WORK 375696 2 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 7,187.70 395099 7/2/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 210.00 375825 5811 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 252.00 375826 5812 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 462.00 395100 7/2/2015 133046 STEVENS COUNTY 400.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 375961 062915 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 400.00 396101 7/2/2015 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 713.13 SPRINKLER INSPECTIONS 375225 1067101 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 713.13 395102 7/2/2015 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 93.62 TANK CLEANER 375227 11258 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 93.62 0 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395102 7/2/2015 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. Continued... 395103 7/2/2015 130625 SURESOURCE LLC 134.76 TIMECARDS 00001121 375959 P411651001017 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 134.76 395104 7/2/2015 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 475.00 MOVIE RENTAL 375784 DB2060425 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 450.00 MOVIE RENTAL 375785 DB2062454 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 925.00 395105 7/2/2015 106673 TAPCO 1,153.39 ROLL UP SIGN 00001134 375228 1492640 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,153.39 395106 7/2/2015 104932 TAYLOR MADE 74.59 APPAREL 375914 30917047 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.59 395107 7/2/2015 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 105.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375752 062415 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 105.80 396108 7/2/2015 136675 TERRY BYRNE INC. 9,800.00 PLUG HUG FIRE HYDRANT CLEANERD001203 375915 PH2O150623 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 9,800.00 395109 7/2/2015 136678 THOMPSON, ONAN & MAE 120.77 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 375916 4618 CASCO AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 120.77 395110 7/2/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 186.50 375917 901270 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,004.45 375828 902054 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 72.20 375827 902055 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,263.15 396111 7/2/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 37.74 WELDING SUPPLIES 00001172 375229 10085198 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 37.74 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. CITY OF EDINA 253.00 CONDUIT 00001125 375924 9381315 28.68 Council Check Register by GL 00001179 375308 9415521 281.68 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 395120 7/2/2016 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 7/2/2015 -- 7/2/2015 00002508 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 395112 7/2/2015 123649 TOWMASTER Continued... 22.08 STRAP RATCHET 00005434 375230 370276 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,268.00 WELD FRAME TANK HOOK UNIT 375753 370305 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 2,290.08 395113 7/2/2015 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT 495.00 HYDRO SEEDING 375919 R22986 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,185.00 HYDRO SEEDING 375919 R22986 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2,300.00 HYDRO SEEDING 375919 R22986 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,980.00 395114 7/2/2016 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 3,979.62 APR/MAY UNIFORMS 375307 053115 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 3,979.62 395115 7/2/2015 100668 URS CORPORATION 2,808.75 PROMENADE PHASE 4 375920 6281580 01251.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2,808.75 396116 7/2/2015 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 284.82 LOCATING FLAGS 00001032 375232 668435 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 284.82 395117 7/2/2016 103690 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 4,795.00 HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 00001211 375233 21637 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,795.00 395118 7/2/2015 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 3,500.00 CART RENTAL 375921 602150011 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 315.28 375922 602150012 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 350.00 375923 602150013 5423.6216 LEASE LINES 395119 7/2/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 253.00 CONDUIT 00001125 375924 9381315 28.68 PORTA-BAND BLADE 00001179 375308 9415521 281.68 395120 7/2/2016 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 68.80 SAFETY VESTS 00002508 375925 3051353 250.60 SAFETY VESTS 00002508 375926 3051546 • 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 32 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL A-251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GOLF CARS GOLF CARS GOLF CARS 1314.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1322.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1261.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1261.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Is 0 0 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Council Check Register by GL Page- 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395120 7/2/2015 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER Continued... 319.40 395121 7/2/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 60.05 375234 10062 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 96.06 375234 10062 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 109.30 375234 10062 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 230.63 375234 10062 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 334.82 375234 10062 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 341.41 375234 10062 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 430.01 375234 10062 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 474.24 375234 10062 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 474.25 375234 10062 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 62.75 375234 10062 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 257.22 375234 10062 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 369.08 375234 10062 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 464.72 375234 10062 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 755.79 375234 10062 5511.6162 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,096.26 375234 10062 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 82.14 375234 10062 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 130.95 375234 10062 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 5,769.68 395122 7/2/2015 136614 WEBBER, ASHLEY JEAN 112.50 BRAEMAR GOLF PHOTOS 375309 061315 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 112.50 395123 7/2/2015 101973 WILMOT, SOLVE[ 147.49 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375754 JAN -FEB -MAR 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 32.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 375754 JAN -FEB -MAR 5952.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING 179.69 395124 7/2/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,512.24 375670 7034966 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 452.25 375833 7035934 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 98.63 375832 7035935 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 652.12 375834 7035938 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,060.20 375831 7035940 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,775.44 395125 7/2/2015 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 395125 7/2/2015 395126 7/2/2015 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 1,196.41 DAC ACTION 00006378 375236 60157892 5422.6545 1,885.28 DAC ACTION 375235 60165812 5422.6545 134960 WINTER, DARCY 79.94 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 355734 5112 INDIANOLA 5900.2015 AVE Subledger Account Description Continued... CHEMICALS CHEMICALS CUSTOMER REFUND 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 34 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 79.94 396127 7/2/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 298.30 375679 1080333930 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 876.19 375685 1080336680 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 248.15 375675 1080337831 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,842.88 375673 1080339455 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 110.45 375674 1080339456 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,089.53 375671 1080339457 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37.15 375672 1080339458 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 361.15 375683 1080339460 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,802.64 375684 1080339462 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,413.62 375680 1080339485 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 33.07 375677 1080339491 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,333.46 375676 1080339492 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 82.30 375682 1080339493 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 635.78 375681 1080339544 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 131.24 375678 1080339545 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 181.11 376004 1080340793 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 316.15 376005 1080340844 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 20,793.17 395128 7/2/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 3,331.80 375688 1090423437 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 117.30 375689 1090423438 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,872.50 375687 1090423439 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,552.50 375686 1090423440 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,768.97 375693 1090423521 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 801.00 375694 1090423522 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 305.60 375931 1090423523 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,983.80 375690 1090424535 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 184.60 375691 1090424536 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 92.40 375692 1090424537 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING Is 0 0 • 7/2/2015 LIGHT & POWER • LIGHT & POWER • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,720.00 CITY OF EDINA 375932 6/30/2015 10:59:44 27,673.50 Council Check Register by GL 375933 Page- 35 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 395130 7/2/2015 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 395128 7/2/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 51-0010613106-9 Continued... 460538985 3,975.55 376006 1090427203 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,245.50 375836 1090427208 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 138.45 375835 1090427209 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 395129 7/2/2015 LIGHT & POWER 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,720.00 TRACY AVE PHASE 2 375932 1-0686-640 27,673.50 VALLEY VIEW RD DESIGN 375933 6-01686-59C 30,393.50 395130 7/2/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 54.59 51-5276505-8 375310 460462256 14.61 51-0010613106-9 375312 460538985 97.11 51-0010025256-3 375311 460546547 10,375.37 51-6644819-9 375962 461666165 10, 541.68 395131 7/2/2015 132109 YOUNG, SEAN 59.91 EXPENSES 375313 K9 TRIALS 69.00 EXPENSES 375313 K9 TRIALS 128.91 395132 7/2/2015 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 1,779.17 VEHICLE REPAIR 375755 13840 1,779.17 395133 7/2/2015 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 1,616.00 INSTRUCTION 375314 4458 1,616.00 395134 7/2/2015 105727 ZEBEC OF NORTH AMERICA INC. 691.03 TUBES FOR SLIDE 375934 22959 691.03 395135 7/2/2015 136375 ZORO TOOLS INC. 90.77 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003580 375786 INV1123126 90.77 395136 7/2/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 243.10 375849 161866 01399.1705.20 01377.1705.21 1330.6185 1321.6185 1322.6185 5720.6185 1400.6104 1400.6107 1553.6180 5110.6103 5311.6406 1470.6510 CONSULTING DESIGN TRACYAVE CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 395136 7/2/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 71.50 227526 20.00 686.52 227527 680.05 334.53 227528 59.28 2,094.98 227529 1,052,233.38 Grand Total PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/2/2015 — 7/2/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No 375850 227519 5520.5510 375614 227526 5862.5515 375615 227527 5862.5514 375616 227528 5842.5514 375613 227529 5822.5514 375848 5058 5520.5510 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD Payment Instrument Totals Checks 942,987.11 A/P ACH Payment 109,246.27 Total Payments 1,052,233.38 6/30/2015 10:59:44 Page- 36 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS • R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 219,317.22 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 3,527.36 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 17,868.91 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 700.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 403,367.64 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 791.73 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,803.73 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 716.44 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 10,478.48 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 70,214.07 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 10,961.72 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 95.21 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 12,716.64 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,354.80 05800 LIQUOR FUND 203,561.73 05900 UTILITY FUND 65,881.05 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 23,296.06 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.20 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,548.39 Report Totals 1,052,233.38 i • CITY OF EDINA 6/30/2015 10:59:53 Council Check Summary Page - 1 7/2/2015 - 7/2/2015 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures data - /A ,I, s 9 • #. a ¢ t i t 9 • • CITY OF ED CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PA MENT REGISTER 03/25/15-04/26/15 • Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2015/04/07 $149.00 Tech Expo LEADING EDGE HUMAN RESOUR 952-9382937 MN 1170.6104 **0127 KAREN KURT 2015/04/08 $55.09 Lunch Meeting MINNETONKA CENTER FOR THE WAYZATA MN 1120.6106 **0127 KAREN KURT 2015/04/13 $1,000.00 Registration/Education ACT*GTS EDUCATIONAL EV 877-551-5560 CA 1120.6104 **0127 KAREN KURT 2015/04/15 $221.96 Lodging GRAND VIEW LODGE TENNIS NISSWA MN 1120.6104 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/03/31 $6.00 Parking U OF M PARKING MINNEAPOLIS MN 1120.6107 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/03/30 $35.70 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/04/02 $197.28 Wireless SPRINT *WIRELESS 800-639-6111 KS 1120.6188 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/04/02 $32.10 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/04/07 $66.50 Food CRAVE GALLERIA EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/04/08 $7.00 Parking MN ST IAP ADM PMD PARK SAINT PAUL MN 1120.6107 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/04/09 $128.62 Tech Expense APPLE STORE #R054 EDINA MN 1120.6188 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/04/09 $5.00 Parking HAAF MPLSPARKING MINNEAPOLIS MN 1120.6107 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/03/27 $48.00 Volunteer Software VOLGISTICS INC 616-456-5388 MI 1120.6105 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/03/31 $2,495.00 Registration MINNEAPOLIS CHAMBER OF C 612-370-9141 MN 1100.6104 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/04/07 $238.10 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/04/14 $51.06 Tablecloths HALLMARK CLEANERS E MINNEAPOLIS MN 1550.6406 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/04/14 $500.00 Registration ACT*GTS MCMA CONFERENC 877-551-5560 CA 1120.6104 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/04/15 $4.27 Ribbon JO -ANN ETC#2026 EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/04/14 $3,517.04 Food BYERLY'S MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/04/15 $221.96 Lodging GRAND VIEW LODGE TENNIS NISSWA MN 1120.6104 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/04/21 $243.03 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/04/21 $242.50 Registration & Membership MINNESOTAAS 651-255-0469 MN 1120.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2015/03/24 $59.61 Lunch for Staff Trip PEQUODS PIZZA - MORTON MORTON GROVE IL 1500.6106 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2015/03/25 $44.00 Parking MSP Airport MSP AIRPORT PARKING SAINT PAUL MN 1500.6106 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2015/03/25 $162.54 Planning Commission PAN ERA BREAD # 608024 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1140.6106 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2015/03/24 $15.05 Dinner for Staff Trip TUSCANY ORD 20258448 CHICAGO IL 1500.6106 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2015/03/24 $71.88 Dinner for Staff Trip TUSCANY ORD 20258448 CHICAGO IL 1500.6106 **9159 CARYTEAGUE 2015/04/22 $24.75 Signs JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 1140.6106 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2015/04/25 $32.08 Southdale/France Work Grp Mtg STARBUCKS #02592 EDINA EDINA MN 1140.6106 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/03/25 $295.00 Job Advertising AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS 8164726100 MO 1556.6121 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/03/31 $265.00 Annual Dues -Jake MNSOCIETYOFCPAS 952-831-2707 MN 1160.6105 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/04/02 $18.25 Transaction fee PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 1160.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/04/02 $19.95 Transaction fee -UB PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 5902.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/04/02 $19.95 Transaction fee PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 1160.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/04/08 ($160.00) Refund -Class GOVERNMENT FINANCE 312-977-9700 IL 1160.6104 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/04/10 $39.25 Food DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1160.6106 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/04/09 $15.00 Registration MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT F 651-7927036 MN 1160.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/04 $100.00 MAAO Membership MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763-569-3357 MN 1190.6105 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/03 $199.00 Trends Seminar APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888-7564624 IL 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/03 $199.00 Trends Seminar APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888-7564624 IL 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/08 $175.00 Summer Seminar MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763-569-3357 MN 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/08 $100.00 MAAO Membership MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763-569-3357 MN 1190.6105 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/08 $50.00 Ethics Course MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763-569-3357 MN 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/14 $145.68 Food -Board Orientation PANERA BREAD #608024 314-984-3495 MN 1190.6106 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/14 $175.00 MAAO Summer Seminar MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763-569-3357 MN 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/14 $175.00 MAAO Summer Seminar MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763-569-3357 MN 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/04/23 $3.52 Water JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1190.6106 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/03/31 $361.00 Membership MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF PROF 651-4572347 MN 1260.6105 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/15-04/26/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/04/02 $24.99 Food THE KITCHEN EDINA MN 1261.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/04/17 $24.50 Stamps USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLIS MN 01412.1705.21 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/04/17 $24.50 Stamps USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLIS MN 01410.1705.21 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/04/21 $112.50 Books AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS 816-472-6100 MO 5960.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/04/23 $3.47 Postage PAYPAL *EBAYINCSHIP 402-935-7733 CA 1261.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/04/23 $1.95 Postage PP*7239CODE 402-935-7733 CA 1261.6406 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/04/06 $410.00 Registration ATSSA 540-3681701 VA 1281.6104 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/04/06 $50.00 Registration ATSSA 540-3681701 VA 1281.6104 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/04/06 $68.22 Fuel HOLIDAY STNSTORE 3596 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1301.6406 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/04/10 $235.39 Supplies STAPLES 00119180 BLOOMINGTON MN 1301.6406 **3477 NOAH SILVER 2015/04/10 $40.00 Application Fee DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 651-2845528 MN 5760.6103 **3477 NOAH SILVER 2015/04/10 $40.00 Application Fee DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1 651-2845528 MN 1642.6406 **3477 NOAH SILVER 2015/04/10 $10.60 Supplies MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1330.6406 **3477 NOAH SILVER 2015/04/17 $55.60 Switch MICHIGAN COMPANY 517-484-9312 MI 1551.6406 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/03/30 $314.88 Ear Plugs WW GRAINGER 877-2022594 PA 5913.6610 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/03/30 ($38.61) Return SEARS ROEBUCK 1142 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5913.6556 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/04/08 $2,245.93 Unknown Charge USA BLUE BOOK 800-493-9876 IL 5913.6556 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/04/08 $201.43 Grease Chopper USA BLUE BOOK 800-493-9876 IL 5921.6556 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/04/10 ($2,245.93) Correction of Unknown Charge USA BLUE BOOK MC GAW PARK IL 5913.6556 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/04/22 $158.63 Voltage Detector WW GRAINGER 877-2022594 PA 5913.6610 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/04/23 $136.78 Propane WM H MCCOY PETROLEUM FUEL MINNEAPOLIS MN 1552.640 **6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2015/04/10 $252.03 Flash, Batteries, Mount, SDHC GANDER MOUNTAIN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5912.6406 **6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2015/04/10 $67.48 Rubber Gloves, Shelving Unit MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5912.6406 **6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2015/04/15 $39.43 Fuel REPAIR RITE AUTOMOTIVE RICHFIELD MN 5932.6406 **6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2015/04/20 $262.97 Battery, Socket Adapter ACME TOOLS #220 PLYMOUTH MN 5913.6406 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/03/30 $100.00 Training TWIN CITY AREA LABOR M 612676-3725 MN 1281.6104 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/04/07 $155.00 Training HTC CUSTOM TRAINING 952-9951300 MN 1281.6104 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/04/17 $75.00 Training PENN FOSTER DOMESTIC 888-4271000 PA 1281.6104 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/04/20 $2,640.00 Training ATSSA 540-3681701 VA 1281.6104 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/04/23 $46.70 Fuel KWIKTRIP 86300008631 STEVENS POINT WI 1281.6104 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/04/24 $289.38 Lodging BEST WESTERN PLOVER PLOVER WI 1281.6104 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/04/24 $289.38 Lodging BEST WESTERN PLOVER PLOVER WI 1281.6104 **1175 JOHN SCHEERER 2015/04/24 $289.38 Lodging BEST WESTERN PLOVER PLOVER WI 1281.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/03/26 $148.69 Conference EB TWIN CITIES ORGANI 888-810-2063 CA 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/03/25 $26.84 Ejector Roll Pin/Pin Punch BROWNELLS INC 641-6235401 IA 1400.6610 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/03/28 $30.59 Fuel HOLIDAY STNSTORE 0325 DULUTH MN 1400.6107 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/03/29 $188.22 Lodging HOLIDAY INNS DULUTH MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK BIERMAIER 2015/03/29 $188.22 Lodging HOLIDAY INNS DULUTH MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK BIERMAIER 2015/03/29 $188.22 Lodging HOLIDAY INNS DULUTH MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/03/31 $80.09 Fuel CANAL PARK MARKET DULUTH MN 1400.6107 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/04/09 $31.63 Food for In Service CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/04/13 $172.66 Food for In Service MR PIG STUFF SHAKOPEE MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/04/13 $22.86 Food for In Service JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/04/17 $140.81 Food for In Service MR PIG STUFF SHAKOPEE MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/04/17 $25.61 Food for in Service JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/04/21 $122.49 Lodging LEST GERMAIN HOTEL ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/04/23 $15.01 Food for In Service JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6104 **4334 CHULTZ 2015/02/15 ($70.83) Disputed transaction IsTHUISBEZORGD UTRECHT 1400.640 CITY OF ED • CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARDOENT REGISTER 03/25/15-04/26/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **4334 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/02/17 $68.61 Disputed transaction THUISBEZORGD UTRECHT 1400.6406 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/04/07 $102.97 Gear LA POLICE GEAR INC LAPOLICEGEAR. CA 1400.6203 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/04/07 $102.97 Gear LA POLICE GEAR INC LAPOLICEGEAR. CA 1400.6203 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/04/10 $49.99 Gear L A POLICE GEAR INC LAPOLICEGEAR. CA 1400.6203 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/01 $5.16 Office Supplies OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 1400.6160 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/07 $14.91 Certificate BLANKS USA BROOKLYN PARK MN 1400.6160 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/16 $352.83 AED Batteries LIVE ACTION SAFETY 844-342-5548 OR 1400.6610 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/17 $28.47 Food -Dispatch Week DAIRY QUEEN #11605 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/20 $137.55 Lodging DOUBLE TREE ROCHESTER MN 1419.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/20 $143.28 Lodging DOUBLE TREE 5072896400 MN 1419.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/20 $143.28 Lodging DOUBLE TREE 5072896400 MN 1419.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/22 $78.14 Food DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1400.6106 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/21 $126.99 Lodging LE ST GERMAIN HOTEL ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6106 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/04/23 $23.41 Office Supplies OFFICE MAX/O FFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 1400.6160 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/03/27 $64.98 Sympathy Flowers ARTISTIC FLORAL 952-920-4772 MN 1470.6406 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/04/08 $32.17 Enforcer App APL* ITUNES.COM/BILL 866-712-7753 CA 1470.6579 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/04/09 $7.00 Parking MN ST IAP ADM PMD PARK SAINT PAUL MN 1470.6107 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/04/15 $27.88 Scale TARGET 00002204 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1470.6406 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/03/27 $67.00 Subscription Renewal HDS*FIRE ENGINEERING 847-763-9540 IL 1470.6105 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/03/28 $20.00 Renewal NATIONAL REGISTRY EMT 614-888-4484 OH 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/02 $201.82 Manual and Guide AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1470.6579 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/20 $38.00 Fuel -FDIC MANSFIELD 66 MANSFIELD IL 1470.6107 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/20 $38.00 Fuel -FDIC GOETZ PORTAGE TRUCKS PORTAGE WI 1470.6107 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/20 $13.50 Food -FDIC SUBWAY 00274852 PORTAGE WI 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/20 $13.00 Parking -FDIC DENISON PLAZA PARKING INDIANAPOLIS IN 1470.6107 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/21 $88.07 Food -FDIC RAM RESTAURANT INDY INDIANAPOLIS IN 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/22 $30.52 Food -FDIC SUBWAY 00153049 INDIANAPOLIS IN 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/24 $57.83 Food -FDIC BEEF HOUSE COVINGTON IN 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/24 $51.00 Fuel -FDIC SHELL OIL 57442754909 OGLESBY IL 1470.6107 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/24 $17.39 Food -FDIC MCDONALD'S F12814 OSSEO WI 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/23 $44.06 Food -FDIC HYATT REGENCY INDY F&B INDIANAPOLIS IN 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/24 $1,680.12 Lodging -FDIC HYATT REGENCY INDIANAPOLI INDIANAPOLIS IN 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/24 $1,882.71 Lodging -FDIC HYATT REGENCY INDIANAPOLI INDIANAPOLIS IN 1470.6104 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/24 $22.53 Food -FDIC HYATT REGENCY INDY F&B INDIANAPOLIS IN 1470.6106 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/04/24 $39.36 Fuel -FDIC SUPERAMERICA 4523 OSSEO WI 1470.6107 **0927 DARRELLTODD 2015/03/26 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAYAUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470,6188 **0927 DARRELLTODD 2015/04/07 $80.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAYAUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELLTODD 2015/04/20 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAYAUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELLTODD 2015/04/24 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAYAUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELLTODD 2015/04/26 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAYAUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/03/27 $21.80 Shred Services FIRST SHRED 763-5373333 MN 1400.6406 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/04/03 $60.00 Spring MEHA PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402-935-7733 CA 1490.6103 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/04/03 $21.80 Shred Services FIRST SHRED 763-5373333 MN 1400.6406 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/04/10 $60.00 Spring MEHA PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402-935-7733 CA 1490.6103 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/04/10 $60.00 Spring MEHA PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402-935-7733 CA 1490.6103 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/03/30 $300.00 Inspection Services SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION 651-251-1850 MN 1495.6103 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/04/01 $56.97 OCE Paper BMK SOLUTIONS CORP 952-7463195 MN 1495.6406 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/04/02 $135.00 ICC Membership INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC 888-422-7233 IL 1495.6105 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/15-04/26/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/04/01 $206.77 OCE Service Fee CANON SOLUTIONS AM ERIC 773-714-8500 IL 1495.6406 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/04/08 $70.72 Roll Paper G.S. DIRECT, INC. 952-942-6115 MN 1495.6406 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/04/09 $318.00 Books INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC 888-422-7233 IL 1495.6405 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/04/22 $37.95 Supplies INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC 888-422-7233 IL 1495.6406 **4619 TIM BARNES 2015/04/08 $128.14 White Noise Machine ACOUSTICAL SURFACE 952-448-5300 MN 1551.6406 **4619 TIM BARNES 2015/04/09 $87.90 Oreck Supplies ORECK CLEAN HOME CARE EDINA MN 1646.6406 **4619 TIM BARNES 2015/04/17 $75.08 Carpet Chair STAPLES 00119180 BLOOMINGTON MN 1551.6406 **4619 TIM BARNES 2015/04/17 $1,123.57 Accoutical Supplies/Service ACOUSTICAL SURFACE 952-448-5300 MN 1551.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/04/01 $284.95 Sun Guard Canopy PAYPAL *EAGLEEYEENT 402-935-7733 CA 1553.6585 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/04/15 $58.99 Blue Rhino SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN 1553.6581 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/04/18 $22.54 Shipping Charges PAYPAL *UPS US 402-935-7733 GA 1553.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/04/25 $269.11 Power Probe IV AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1553.6585 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/04/15 $0.80 License Plates/Tabs MN DVS STLSPK 001695 FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1553.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/04/15 $33.00 License Plates/Tabs MN DVS ST LS PK 001 695 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1553.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/04/20 $51.52 License Plates/Tabs MN DVS STLSPK 001 695 FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1553.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/04/20 $2,102.96 License Plates/Tabs MN DVS ST LS PK 001695 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1553.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/04/24 $22.00 License Plates/Tabs MN DVS ST LS PK 001 695 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1553.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2015/04/24 $0.53 License Plates/Tabs MN DVS STLSPK 001695 FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1553.6260 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/01 $179.90 Spare Mice AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/13 $51.36 Tablet Case AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5410.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/15 $245.00 Software for TSchmitz ITERUM.COM 801-560-5733 UT 1470.6579 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/16 $45.94 Misc IT AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1262.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/18 $71.36 iPad Case -T Shirley AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5760.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/21 $65.29 Misc Cables AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/22 $45.56 iPad Supplies for Inspections AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1495.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/23 $27.98 Spare iPad Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/22 $375.00 Training LYNDA.COM, INC. 888-3359632 CA 1554.6104 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/04/23 $78.93 Supplies for Engineering AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5960.6406 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/03/25 $20.96 Concessions Yogurt & Oranges CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 5730.5510 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/04/14 $188.76 Birthday Party Supplies FUN EXPRESS 800-228-0122 NE 5311.6406 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/04/16 $10.00 Concessions Yogurt CUB FOODS #1636 SHOREWOOD MN 5730.5510 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/04/18 $351.00 Family Movie Night SWANK MOTION PICTURES IN 800-876-5445 MO 5710.5587 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2015/04/19 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAYAUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1600.6188 **7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/04/07 ($9.64) Write off SMALL BALANCE WRITE-OFF MINNEAPOLIS MN 1628.6406 **7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/04/21 $9.64 Write off REV CPS OPS ADJ FROM 4/17 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1628.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/04/01 $136.50 Facility Use EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION 952-8483947 MN 1624.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/04/01 $260.00 Facility Use EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION 952-8483947 MN 1624.6406 **7130. ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/04/01 $1,575.00 Facility Use EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION 952-8483947 MN 1621.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/04/01 $416.00 Facility Use EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION 952-8483947 MN 1624.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/04/13 $799.80 4 Easton Bats AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1621.6406 **6032 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2015/03/27 $276.00 Kid Create Programs KIDCREATE STUDIO EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1627.6103 **6032 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2015/03/27 $276.00 Kid Create Programs KIDCREATE STUDIO EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1627.6103 **6032 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2015/03/27 $280.80 Bowling Fees BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN PR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629.6103 **6032 KRISTIN AARSVOLD 2015/03/27 $405.60 Bowling Fees BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN PR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629.6103 **0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2015/04/20 $160.00 Climbing School VERMEER PACIFIC 952-890-6144 MN 1644.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/03/25 $20.00 Data Plan-Bennerotte VZWRLSS*PRPAYAUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/03/26 $160.68 Van Ramps for Tricaster HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS 137 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1130.6410 **2293 J JWER BENNEROTTE 2015/03/27 $36.03 Usage ofRITEVERIFY 980-621-1625 NC 1130.612 CITY OF ED1 • VENT REGISTERCITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD 03/25/15-04/26/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/03/27 $399.00 Archiving Platform ARCH IVESOCIAL.COM 919-275-0252 NC 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/03/30 $19.99 Carbon Copy Cloner PP *FASTSPRING CARBONCO 402-935-7733 CA 1130.6410 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/01 $70.00 BUSINESS EXPENS MIDWEST BROADCAST JOURNAL STURGIS SD 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/03 $2.32 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/02 $95.20 NAB Show-Denfeld BALLYS HOTEL ADVANCE DEP 7029674111 NV 1130.6104 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/03 $10.72 Photoshop ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/05 $20.00 Data Plan-Kaylin VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6188 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/05 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Denfeld ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/06 $20.00 Data Plan-Gilgenbach VZWRLSS* P RPAY AUTO PAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/06 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Denfeld ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/07 $11.96 Subscription Renewal THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCULAT 612-6734343 MN 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/10 $127.50 Subscription MAILCHIMP MAILCHIMP.COM GA 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/11 $20.00 Data Plan-Denfeld VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6188 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/12 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Kaylin ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/13 $32.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/15 $40.00 Values VIP Awards TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1550.6121 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/18 $5.00 Spam Blocker AKSMT.COM 877-273-3049 CA 1130.6124 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/16 $32.17 Creative Cloud -Jordan ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/18 $29.95 Freshbooks Online Invoicing 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS 416-481-6946 ON 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/22 $20.00 Data Plan -Swenson VZWRLSS* P RPAY AUTO PAY 888-294-6804 CA 1120.6188 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/04/25 $20.00 Data Plan-Bennerotte VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6106 **5821 AMY SMITH 2015/03/26 $49.00 Stamps USPS 26631404233413782 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5410.6235 **5821 AMYSMITH 2015/04/26 $6.38 Food CUB FOODS#3124 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5421.5510 **2892 TOM SWENSON 2015/04/10 $52.71 Mower Parts JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5422.6406 **5811 JOSEPH ABOOD 2015/03/26 $11.47 Food -Task Force Meeting PLYMOUTH RAINBOW PLYMOUTH MN 5410.6122 **5811 JOSEPH ABOOD 2015/04/20 $284.82 Food -Staff Training Dinner THE TIN FISH EDINA MN 5410.6104 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/03/28 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 5440.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/04/02 ($0.01) In and Out BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE EDINA MN 5440.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/04/02 $0.01 In and Out BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE EDINA MN 5440.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/04/05 $200.00 Braemar Preferred Course Fee EWGA- MN METRO CHAPTER PALM BEACH GA FL 5410.6105 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/04/08 $61.32 Batteries TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5410.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/04/14 ($0.75) In and Out BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE EDINA MN 5440.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/04/14 $0.75 In and Out BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 952-9035750 MN 5440.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/04/19 $8.56 Clean Cloth, Purell TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5410.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/04/21 $32.13 Pens, Memo Pads, Writing Pads OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5410.6513 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2015/04/07 $64.24 Transflu QT Dexr-NOL75-200 NAPA STORE 3279005 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/03/31 $37.51 Tool Box THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/04/10 $51.92 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/04/02 $198.97 Bulbs 1000BULBS.COM 800-6244488 TX 5511.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/04/07 $153.30 Bin for Lost and Found NRI*RUBBERMAID 888-895-2110 OH 5551.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/04/08 $100.00 Playgrounds Field Trip PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/04/20 $75.00 Travelin Teens AIRMAXX TRAMPOLINE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1624.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/04/04 $39.73 Building -General Supplies IKEA BLOOMINGTON BLOOMINGTON MN 5111.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/04/22 $134.98 Media -General Supplies THE UPS STORE 2965 EDINA MN 5125.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/04/23 $33.89 Building -General Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5111.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/04/23 $245.00 Building -General Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5111.6406 **9665 SUSAN FAUS 2015/04/02 $30.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAYAUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1600.6188 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/03/26 $100.00 Postage POSTAGE REFILL 800-468-8454 CT 5710.6235 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/15-04/26/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/04/02 $43.47 Meter Rental PITNEY BOWES* 800-228-1071 CT 5710.6235 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/04/06 $422.58 Personal Purchase -Reimbursed WALGREENS #6943 INVER GROVE MN 5720.6406 **1282 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/04/24 $100.00 Postage POSTAGE REFILL 800-468-8454 CT 5710.6235 **5720 ROGER LEMIRE 2015/03/25 $328.52 Swing Cart FLAGHOUSE INC 800-793-7900 NJ 5720.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/03/27 $70.64 Supplies BFG SUPPLY CO 440-8341883 OH 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/01 $3.75 Coke Classic CVS/PHARMACY #05788 EDINA MN 5761.6511 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/01 $509.91 4 Lounge Chairs (7.125%) MENARDS BURNSVILLE BURNSVILLE MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/01 $6.34 Coupler WW GRAINGER 877-2022594 PA 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/02 $170.92 Tarps, Paint and Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/04 $24.07 Green Laser Pointer Pen AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/06 $194.64 Tarp, Boots, Gloves MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/08 $196.90 DVD Video TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5760.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/08 $17.98 Green Laser Pointer Pen AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/09 $3.21 Soap Pads JOHNSON HARDWARE BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/09 $5.89 Grill and Oven Cleaner ACE HARDWARE AND PAINT BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/10 $70.32 Bedding Fork, Gloves MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/16 $1,498.00 Veteran's Memorial IN *METALLIC ARTS 509-4897178 WA 47073.6710 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/17 $354.00 Projector AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5760.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/21 $97.26 Supplies NOR*NORTHERN TOOL 800-222-5381 MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/22 $138.60 Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/04/23 $113.39 Supplies NOR*NORTHERN TOOL 800-222-5381 MN 5761.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/03/24 ($1.66) Cover THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5821.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/03/24 $2.29 Cover THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5821.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/03/30 $149.00 Wine EVERGREEN LABS 509-5270607 WA 5842.5515 **0093_ STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/08 $3.20 Parking MN ST IAP ADM PMD PARK SAINT PAUL MN 5840.6106 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/15 $43.72 Holder, Swirl, Cut -Out, Brush HUBERT COMPANY 800-543-7374 OH 5821.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/15 $43.72 Holder, Swirl, Cut -Out, Brush HUBERT COMPANY 800-543-7374 OH 5841.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/15 $43.70 Holder, Swirl, Cut -Out, Brush HUBERT COMPANY 800-543-7374 OH 5861.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/19 $12.78 Mop THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5862.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/21 $28.32 Ice Min Pip TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1100.6106 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/23 $158.34 Advertising CITY PAGES 612-3723705 MN 5822.6122 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/23 $158.34 Advertising CITY PAGES 612-3723705 MN 5842.6122 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/04/23 $158.32 Advertising CITY PAGES 612-3723705 MN 5862.6122 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/03/26 $47.75 Brass Elbow, Clamp MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/03/29 $20.16 Nylon Braid Rope JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 7411.6215 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/03/26 $85.69 Circular Saw SEARS ROEBUCK 1142 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6710 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/03/30 $45.43 Boards and Underlayment MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/03/31 $18.60 Polyurethane JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 7411.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON - 2015/04/15 $35.63 Heavy Tee Hinge and Fasteners JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 7413.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/04/17 $26.77 Primer and Paint JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 7413.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/04/18 $65.91 Coats GKDIRECT- CATALOG 877-352-8181 GA 7411.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/04/17 $399.07 Kennedy Wedge HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS 230 952-937-9666 MN 7413.6406 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/04/01 $30.00 Email service EMA*EMMA EMAIL MARKETING 800-5954401 TN 7410.6122 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/04/01 $19.10 Belt DALCO ENTERPRISES, INC 651-604-2966 MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/04/06 $27.85 Microfiber Cloths MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/04/08 $4.47 Mail and Supplies SQ *POSTAL DISPATCH BUSIN BLOOMINGTON MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/04/14 $38.22 Rags, Towels, Trashbags THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 90D KOPLOS 2015/04/15 $12.77 Lubricant, Brakeleen, Lynchpin orENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 • CITY OF ED CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARDP ENT REGISTER 03/25/15-04/26/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/04/21 $130.52 Batteries, Towels, Flood Lights MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/04/25 $75.06 Trolley THE HOME DEPOT #2845 $47,309.72 • City State Account EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 RICHFIELD MN 7411.6406 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date `7 / -z / er • • • To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item M IV. C. From: Jeff Brown Action 0 Community Health Administrator Discussion ❑ Date: July 7, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015-65 Approving Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement 2015-2016. Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2015-65 authorizing the City of Edina to amend the current Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). Information / Background: The City of Edina receives funding from the Minnesota Department of Health for Public Health Emergency Preparedness to continue preparing for response to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, mass dispensing, and other threats to public health. This amendment is the funding mechanism for the July 2015 through June 2016 budget period. The total amount of additional funding for this period is $58,717. This amendment builds upon the activities completed in the previous budget periods, and will address ongoing changes in federal requirements. In June, City staff participated in a metro -wide mass dispensing exercise in which simulated medication was distributed to essential personnel and their families. As in the past, the grant money will be used specifically to cover costs of the Public Health Emergency Preparedness contract with the City of Bloomington, Edina Health Division staff training, emergency preparedness supplies, administration of the grant, and public health emergency preparedness exercises. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Amendment. Additional Information / Background: Resolution No. 2015-65 Minnesota Department of Health Grant Project Agreement Amendment City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • 0 RESOLUTION NO 2015-65 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO ENTER INTO A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services, and WHEREAS, the STATE and the City of Edina have entered into a master grant contract effective January 1, 2015, and WHEREAS, the STATE has entered into an agreement with the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to assist local health departments in demonstrating measurable and sustainable progress toward achieving public health preparedness capabilities and other activities that promote safer and more resilient communities, and implement and carry out the CDC's Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into Public Health Emergency Response Grant Agreement Amendment with the Minnesota Department of Health to successfully complete administrative and programmatic duties contained within this grant agreement. Passed and adopted this 7th day of July 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 7, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 12015. City Clerk Minnesota Department of Health Grant Project Agreement Amendment • Public Health Emergency Preparedness (PREP) CFDA# 93.069 Original Purchase Order #: 3000015843 +Current Amendment Amount: $58,717 Grant Agreement Start Date: 7/1/2013 +Ori inal Grant Agreement: $38,277 Original Grant Agreement Expiration Date:6/30/2017 +Previous Amendments Total: $39,198 Revised Grant Agreement -Expiration Date: Not Applicable =New Total Grant Agreement Amount: $136,192 This GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT is by and between the State of Minnesota, through its Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Health (hereinafter "STATE") and City of Edina Community Health Board 4801 W. 50"' Street Edina, MN 55424(hereinafter "GRANTEE"). Recitals The STATE has a grant project agreement with the GRANTEE identified as SWIFT Contract # 65467 1 SWIFT Original PO #3000015843 ("Original Grant Project Agreement") to demonstrate measurable and sustainable progress in the implementation and execution of the CDCs Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning. (hereafter, Preparedness Capabilities). Funding and activities for this agreement authorized under Section 319C of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act as amended by the Pandemic and All -Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006 (PAPHA). If applicable, contingent supplemental emergency response awards are authorized under 317 (a) and 317 (d) of the Public Health Services Act subject to available funding and appropriation requirements and limitations. 2. This Amendment builds upon the activities completed in the previous budget periods which were designed to provide a systematic approach to develop, sustain and demonstrate progress toward achieving CDC's Public Health Emergency Preparedness Capabilities. This amendment provides additional federal funding for Budget Period4 (BP4) based on continuing funding from CDC to carry on progress in achieving the operational capacity and implementation of the preparedness capabilities into the GRANTEE's on-going agency operations. 3. The STATE and the GRANTEE are willing to amend the Original Grant Project Agreement as stated below. Grant Project Agreement Amendment In this Amendment deleted grant project agreement terms will be struck out and the added grant project agreement terms will be underlined. REVISION 1. Clause III CONSIDERATION AND TERMS OF PAYMENT is amended as follows: A. Consideration for all services performed by GRANTEE pursuant to this project agreement shall be paid by the STATE as follows: 1. Compensation. The total obligation of the STATE for all compensation and reimbursement to GRANTEE shall not exceed seventy seven thousand f „« t,,,ndre.a seventy five dollars ($77,475) one hundred thirty-six thousand one hundred ninety-two dollars ($136,192). HE -01603-04 (07/09) 0 0 Project Agreement Amendment covering 2015-2016 PHEP Budget Period 4 (BP4) To Project Agreement SWIFT Contract # 65467 1 SWIFT Original PO #3000015843 Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board Budget Period Award Amounts Each specific Budget Period award is available only for the specific Budget Period in for which it was awarded. Funds remaining and not fully liquidated at the end of each Budget Period will be cancelled and will not be available to the GRANTEE in any subsequent Budget Period. Award Name Budget Period Award Amount Budget Period 2 Budget Period 2 $28,592 PHEP July 1, 2013 -June 30, 2014 Budget Period 2 Budget Period 2 $ 9,685 CRI July 1, 2013 -June 30, 2014 Budget Period 3 Budget Period 3 $ 29,198 PHEP July 1, 2014 -June 30, 2015 Funding Category 1 Budget Period 3 Budget Period 3 $10,000 CRI July 1, 2014 -June 30, 2015 Budget Period 4 Budget Period 4 $ 46,717 PHEP July 1, 2015 -June 30, 2016 Funding Category 1 Budget Period 4 Budget Period 4 $ 12,000 CRI July 1, 2015 -June 30, 2016 Budget Period 5 Budget Period 5 $ To Be Determined PHEP July 1, 2016 -June 30, 2017 Budget Period 5 Budget Period 5 $ To Be Determined CRI July 1, 2016 -June 30, 2017 B. Terms of Payment is amended as follows: 1. Payments are to be made from federal funds obtained by the State through Section 319C of the PHS Act, as amended by the PAPHA Act amendments thereto. CFDA # 93.069. 2. All frlancial transactions will be on a reimbursement basis only. 3. Payments shall be made by the STATE promptly after GRANTEE'S presentation of valid invoices for services performed and acceptance of such services by the STATE'S Authorized Representative pursuant to Clause V, except that the STATE reserves the right not to honor invoices that are submitted more than 30 days after the submission date specified below. 4. Invoices shall be submitted in a form prescribed by the STATE and according to the following schedule: Each Budget Period of this Grant Agreement is subject to the following invoice submission schedule. Valid invoices and supporting documentation are required to be received at OEP on or before the deadline listed below. HE -01603-04 (07/09) Grant Project Agreement Amendment Page 1 Project Agreement Amendment covering 2015-2016 PHEP Budget Period 4 (BP4) To Project Agreement SWIFT Contract # 654671 SWIFT Original PO #3000015843 Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board Invoice Submission Schedule Invoice Due Invoice Activity Period Deadline for receipt at OEP 1st Quarter Jul 1 -September 30 October 31 2nd Quarter October 1- December 31 January 31 3rd Quarter January 1- March 31 Aril 30 4th Quarter/ BP Final Invoice April 1- June 30 July 31 Except as amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Grant Agreement and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this grant project agreement amendment to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. APPROVED: 1. GRANTEE 2. STATE AGENCY The Grantee certifies that the appropriate persons(s) have executed the Project Agreement amendment approval and certification that STATE project agreement amendment on behalf of the Grantee as required by funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A.15 and applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. 160.05. By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: By: Title: Date: Distribution: Agency — Original (filly executed) Grant Project Agreement Amendment Grantee State Authorized Representative (with delegated authority) HE -01603-04 (07/09) Grant Project Agreement Amendment Page 2 0 Is To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL A, �?l� O e ��cbRpo8 11wo Agenda Item #: IV. D. From: Ross Bintner P.E. — Environmental Engineer Action X❑ Discussion ❑ Date: July 7, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Authorize Joint Powers Purchase Agreement for Community Solar Gardens Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to Sign Joint Powers Purchase Agreement for Community Solar Gardens Information / Background: At its June 17, 2015 meeting, Council reviewed advice from the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) recommending that the City of Edina participate in a joint purchase led by the Metropolitan Council and directed staff to follow up on this recommendation with a report. Community Solar Gardens (CSG) are developed under a program mandated by Minn. Stat. 216B.1641 from regulated utilities such as Xcel Energy, from which the City of Edina draws power for its facilities. The program began in late 2014, and has been guided by various Public Utilities Commission orders as recent at June 25, 2015 governing details of the implementation of this program. City of Edina staff began fielding calls from solar developers interested in selling subscriptions to CSGs almost immediately after the program's launch. Subscriptions are anticipated to provide a net savings for subscribers with subscriptions costing less than the associated Xcel bill credits they generate. Additional information about subscriptions is attached for your reference. In anticipation of limitation to CSG supply and a market that favors sellers, the Met Council, Hennepin County, Ramsey County and the City of Minneapolis organized a joint Request for Proposals to consolidate the administrative and legal review and promote competitive pricing. Met Council has invited interested parties to submit a letter of intent, joint powers purchase agreement (JPA) and list of facilities for participation. Upon opening of proposal, the Met Council will conduct a lottery drawing for each 400kWh block to equitably distribute and match subscribers to CSGs. Staff supports the EEC recommendation to join the Met Council joint RFP because of the administrative efficiencies and equitable distribution of credits and recommends a partial list of facilities for enrollment into the JPA. Attachments: Letter of Intent Joint Powers Purchase Agreement City of Edina Facility Load Estimate City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. ° Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION • MN CERTS Subscriber FAQ Xcel Energy Subscriber FAQ • CJ Page 2 July 7, 2015 Mr. Jason Willett Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 390 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 <Via email only jason.willett@metc.state.mn.us> RE: Community Solar Garden Dear Mr. Willett: The City of Edina (Edina) believes the societal, financial and environmental value of Community Solar Gardens (CSGs) warrants Edina pursuing this opportunity in conjunction with other local government entities. As such, City of Edina staff has reviewed various materials and resources with regard to CSGs and have reviewed the electrical loads of the City's facilities. From this information, we have concluded that there is value in this program and therefore, the City of Edina intends to participate in subscriptions that become available as part of the Metropolitan Council's Request for Proposals for CSG Subscription Agreements slated to occur in June or July, 2015. Attached to this letter is a list of facilities the City intends to involve in the purchase of Community Solar •Garden subscriptions if the price and terms of the subscription agreements meet the City's goals and objectives. In total, this is a commitment not to exceed 10,400,000 kWh. This letter does not bind the City of Edina to participate in a joint RFP process, sign any specific subscription agreements, or otherwise commit financial resources to the Metropolitan Council's Local Units of Government Community Solar Garden project. Nor does submitting this letter to the Metropolitan Council prevent the City of Edina from soliciting for CSG subscriptions alone or with other entities. The intent of this letter is to clearly state the City of Edina's desire to participate in one or more community solar gardens based on the terms and conditions of the proposals received as a result of the Request for Proposals for Community Solar Garden Subscription Agreements being issued by the Metropolitan Council in June or July, 2015. We encourage the Metropolitan Council to continue to take a leadership role on CSG projects so that the City of Edina along with other local government entities can participate in the financially responsible and environmentally preferable attributes of solar energy and share those benefits with its residents and businesses. Together, by leveraging the strength of local government entities and the expertise of the Metropolitan Council, we can reduce carbon emissions and improve the overall quality of life for metro area residents and businesses. Sincerely, Scott Neal, Manager City of Edina •GAPW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENVIRONMENT DIV\Energy and Environment Commission\Working Groups\Community Solar\ 150707 EEC Solar Garden Advisory Letter of Intent to MET COUNCIL.docx ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov. 952-826-0371 . Fax 952-826-0392 Contract No. • Joint Powers Purchasing Agreement for Solar Garden Subscriptions THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered among the Metropolitan Council, County of Hennepin, County of Ramsey, City of Minneapolis, and other governmental units as provided in Section 2 and as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, subd. 1 (the "Party" or "Parties" depending on context). WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, the Parties are authorized to enter into agreements to exercise jointly or cooperatively governmental powers common to each and to permit one governmental entity to perform services or functions for another governmental unit; and WHEREAS, the Parties wish to share their purchasing powers in order to secure the most favorable terms and conditions for the purchase of solar garden subscriptions; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED, by and between the Parties hereto as follows: 1. This Joint Powers Agreement ("Agreement") will become effective upon the execution of each Party and shall continue in full force and effect for all executing Parties, until a Party withdraws in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. • 2. Any "governmental unit", as defined in Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, is eligible to become a Party to this Agreement and may do so by execution of this Agreement. Upon execution, the Agreement becomes effective as to the signing governmental unit and the signed Agreement shall be transmitted to the Contract Administrator. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each counterpart for all purposes being deemed an original and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 3. The Hennepin County Administrator, or his/her designee or successor, will be the Contract Administrator and will be responsible for maintaining the records related to the administration of this Agreement. Each Party shall designate a contact person and provide written notice to all other Parties of the name and pertinent contact information for the Party's contact person. The Contract Administrator's responsibility may be transferred to another Party. 4. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, the Parties may make joint purchases or make purchases using any other Party's existing contracts for solar garden subscriptions. 5. This Agreement applies to all purchases made through a competitive solicitation process or by direct negotiations as allowed by Minnesota Statutes § 471.345, or as permitted by other Minnesota Statutes applicable to each Party, at the prices and terms available. 0 • 6. When making a joint purchase, the joint purchasers shall first consult with each interested purchaser to ensure that the requirements and specifications of the interested purchasers meet the needs of the joint purchasers and are included in the solicitation documents. 7. Prior to completing a purchase using another Party's existing contract, a Party shall enter into and execute its own purchasing document with the contract vendor. 8. Each Party shall make payment directly to the contract vendor according to the established procedures of the paying Party. 9. No Party shall assume any responsibility for the accountability of funds expended by any other Party or the issuance of any purchasing document by any other Party. 10. Each Party shall be separately accountable for its own expenditures of public funds made hereunder. 11. As mutually agreed upon, the Parties may share the costs associated with any shared bidding or solicitation process. 12. Each Party shall abide by all applicable state and federal law, rules and regulations. 13. The Parties' total liability under this Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota Statutes Is § 471.59, subd. 1 a(a). Each Party agrees that it will be responsible for the acts or omissions of its officials, agents, and employees, and the results thereof, in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts/omissions of the other Parties and the results thereof. For purposes of determining total liability for damages, the participating governmental units, are considered to be a single governmental unit, the total liability of which shall not exceed the limits for a single governmental unit as provided in Minnesota Statutes § 466.04, subd. 1. Each Party agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other Parties, their officials, agents, and employees, from any liability, loss, or damages the other Parties may suffer or incur as the result of demands, claims, judgments, or cost arising out of or caused by the indemnifying Party's negligence in the performance of its respective obligations under this Agreement. This provision shall not be construed nor operate as a waiver of any applicable limitation of liability, defenses, immunities, or exceptions by statute or common law. To the full extent permitted by law, actions by the Parties pursuant to this Agreement are intended to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the Parties that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes § 471.59, subd. 1 a(a); provided further that for purposes of that statute, each Party to this Agreement expressly declines • responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other Parties. OA 0 The Parties to this Agreement are not liable for the acts or omissions of the other Parties to this Agreement except to the extent to which they have agreed in writing to be responsible for acts or omissions of the other Parties. 14. Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement by sending the Contract Administrator a notice to withdraw. Such withdrawal shall not void any purchases for which another Party has executed a purchasing document with the withdrawing Party's contract vendor or to any joint purchase made by the other Parties and the withdrawing Party. 15. Any amendments or modification to this Agreement, except for a withdrawal by any Party, shall be in writing and shall not be effective until executed by all Parties to this Agreement. 16. Based on the purpose of the Agreement, no general payment of funds are contemplated such that surplus will be created. All property obtained pursuant to this Agreement shall belong to the Party that purchased it under the process called for herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Joint Powers Purchasing Agreement to be signed and approved by the proper officers of each of the contracting Parties, and attested by the proper officer, on the dates written below. n Reviewed by Counsel for Party (if needed) 0 COUNTY OF STATE OF MINNESOTA By: Its: Date: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By: Its: Date: Arneson Acres Greenhouse Yes 17,245 Arneson Acres Museum No 25,142 Art Center No 145,546 Braemar Arena Yes 3,521,016 Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse Yes 359,289 Braemar Golf Dome Yes 185,500 Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion Yes 166,162 Centennial Lakes Maintenance Yes 36,250 City Hall Yes 1,385,728 Edinborough Park Yes 1,092,594 =Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave Yes 265,336 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave _. Yes 66,652 Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse No 29,556 Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance No 4,899 `Liquor Store 50th St Yes 139,499 Liquor Store Vernon Ave Yes 188,610 Liquor Store York Ave Yes 220,587 Public Works Yes 1,031,725 Senior Center No 207,477 South Metro Public Safety Training Facility No 242,231 Sanitary Lift Station 6 Yes 288,000 WTP 2, Well 6 Yes 360,000 WTP 3, Well 10 and 11 Yes 900,000 WTP 4, Well 12 and 13 Yes 840,000 WTP6 Yes 1,200,000 TOTAL 12,919,046 Recommend at 85% of total load Recommend at 100% of total load Recommend at 115% of total load s $3,123 $16,426 _ 3,521,016 _ $347,253 $347,253 359,289 $44,296 $44,296 185,500 $18,383 $18,383 166,162 $17,656 $17,656 36,250 $4,469 $4,469 1,385,728 $110,500 $110,500 1,092,594 $109,855 $109,855 265,336 $22,910 __. $22,910 66,652 $6,903 -_ $6,903 $4,125 ., $789 139,499 $14,221 $14,221 188,610 $18,605 $18,605 220,587 $23,329 $23,329' 1,031,725 $101,910 $101,910 $22,608 $30,524 288,000 $21,600 $21,600 360,000 $27,000 $27,000 900,000 $67,500 $67,500 840,000 $63,000 _ $63,000 1,200,000 $90,000 $90,000 12,264,194 $1,189,209 $1,111,614 10,424,565 12,264,194 14,103,823 s COMMU, ITY S LAR G#RDEN 0) 0 • ba c This document begins by briefly introducing Community Solar Gardens and what you should know as a potential subscriber. It then continues with questions that you can ask operators as you move forward. Community Solar Gardens (also called Community Solar and Community -Shared Solar) are centrally - located solar photovoltaic (PV) systems that produce electricity for participating subscribers. They are a way for people in Minnesota to benefit from solar PV systems without installing their own stand-alone project. Programs vary by utility in Minnesota. Many cooperative utility customers can subscribe to a project owned by their local utility. Customers served by Xcel Energy can participate in projects offered private Community Solar Garden Operators. To help prospective subscribers decide which project might be right, CERTs, Minnesota Department of Commerce, Minnesota Solar Energy Industry Association, and Minnesota Renewable Energy Society have developed a document outlining what any Subscriber Agreement should address and highlighting the questions that can be asked up front to ensure a clear understanding of the subscription and its terms. ee what Community Solar Subscriber Agreements should include by downloading our subscriber checklist at MnCERTs.org/CSG-Disclosure Before subscribing to any particular project, all subscribers should ask for and review the operator's subscriber agreement. All subscriber agreements should address elements included in the Community Solar Garden Subscriber Disclosure Checklist (see link at left). Additional questions that subscribers can ask are on the pages to come. • How long have you been in business? How many installations have you done? Do you have references I can contact? • Will I be able to visit the system? How can I show I'm participating? • Will I be able to see online how much my subscription is producing for the life of my subscription agreement? • How will I receive updates about the project? How will I be notified if something goes wrong? • Who handles my subscription over time? Who do I call if I have questions? • When do I need to sign a subscriber agreement? What kind of paperwork will I need to fill out? • What types of PV modules will be used in the project? How do they differ from other panels on the market, and why did you choose them? • What will you do to ensure that the panels won't become shaded by another structure in the future? Subscribers will be compensated for their share of the Community Solar Garden system's output via a credit on their utility bill. The credit will be made on a dollar per kilowatt hour produced ($/kWh) basis for most utilities. bscribers in Xcel Energy's service territory will be compensated at the Applicable Retail Rate (ARR) for the ration of their subscription, which may last up to 25 years. The ARR is calculated by Xcel Energy by dividing the previous year's revenues by sales for each customer class; the ARR will be updated every year. Subscribers should verify their service class (i.e., residential service, small general service, or general service*) prior to subscribing. The current ARRs plus renewable energy credit (REQ payments by Community Solar Garden size are listed below. Most operators make assumptions that the ARR will change over time when they estimate a subscriber's potential I eturn on investment. The retail None (Applicable Retail Rate) 0.12033 0.11783 t t d 0.09456 ra e ren s overt e past h 2 2014 Xcel Energy Applicable Retail Rates + REC Payments ($/kWh) 0 to 25 years are a good rule of $0.02 (> 250 kW gardens) 0.14033 0.13783 0.11456 thumb to ground truth these numbers. An assessment by Xcel $0.03 (<_ 250 kW gardens) 0.15033 0.14783 0.12456 Energy indicates that the ARRs across all customer classes have increased an average of 2.6 to 2.9 percent per year since 1992. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission has jurisdiction over Community Solar Garden rates for Xcel Energy and other investor-owned utilities. The Commission may change the community solar garden subscription rates for future projects, but community solar gardens forming under the current ARR structure will receive the ARRs in place at the time the solar energy is generated for the life of the community solar garden. RECs stands for Renewable Energy Credits, which represent the renewable attributes of solar and other renewable energy generation. Operators in Xcel Energy's Community Solar Garden program may elect to sell the RECs to the O+ility. In the case of Xcel Energy customers, the compensation will be paid directly to the subscriber based on the e of the garden as described in the table above. If the RECs are sold, subscribers cannot market themselves as "solar powered," as the green attributes for subscription are assigned to the owner of the RECs. This is consistent with Green -E best practices to avoid double counting (see link in More Resources section). {_ The General Service customer class is also referred to as the Demand -Metered customer class. 0 participate in a project, a potential subscriber must purchase a subscription. There are two primary subscription models: pay upfront and pay-as-you-go. In a pay upfront model a subscriber purchases a subscription for a onetime fee that covers the life of the agreement. The subscriber reaps the subscription benefits (utility bill credits for energy produced) for the length of their subscription. In a pay-as-you-go model a subscriber pays in installments, which are often based on the Community Solar Garden's production attributed to their subscription. Whichever route you choose, you will not actually own solar panels, you will own a subscription for the solar energy system's production. Xcel Energy customers can subscribe to as little as 200 watts of solar capacity or up to 120% of their average annual energy use. Subscription Size and Price Questions • To participate, do I pay an upfront subscription fee, a monthly subscription fee, or a combination thereof? • What is the subscription price? Is it an up -front price or a monthly charge? Is the subscription price all inclusive, or are there additional administrative or maintenance fees that may be charged? • Approximately how much energy will the system produce, and what portion of my energy use might I expect my subscription to offset annually? Based on your subscription rates, what would it cost me to cover all of my electricity use? • What happens if my subscription's energy production exceeds my energy bill during the year? What happens if it exceeds 120% of my energy use? Who benefits from my subscription's excess production? Additional Subscription Terms Questions • What is the term of my subscription (i.e., how long does it last; under what conditions is there an exit penalty)? • What happens if I move, want to cancel, or die? How will my shares be transferred? Is it my responsibility to sell it to someone else? • How much will I be paid for my subscription at the time of transfer or cancellation? • What are the tax implications of my subscription? • What happens to my subscription if the operator goes out of business or sells the garden? • Describe the production and maintenance warranties included in the subscription agreement. • What happens if the operator is unable to maintain and operate the garden? What are my remedies as a subscriber? • What happens if the garden is perpetually under -producing? What are my remedies as a subscriber? Learn more from CERTs in our Guide to Community Solar Gardens, which includes a list of developers and operators, program updates, and frequently asked questions at MnCERTs.org/SolarGardens. Green -E: green-e.org/getcert re stan.shtml Questions for Hiring a Contractor by Minnesota Department of Commerce: mn gov/commerce/energy/images/Hiring-Renewable-Energy-Installerpdf • Michigan Community Solar Gardens Guidebook by Great Lakes Renewable Energy Association: michigan.gov/documents/mdcd/Michigan Community Solar Guidebook 437888 7 pdf • Community Solar Garden Guide by NREL: nrel.gov/docs/fyl losti/49930.pdf • Page 1 of 4 7 xcelEne►gy Solar*Rewards° Community° Minnesota Subscriber FAQs How can I subscribe to a community solar garden? In order to be a subscriber to the Minnesota Solar*Rewards Community (S*RC) program, you must be an Xcel Energy electric retail customer in Minnesota. The location of the customer premise associated with the account receiving the bill credit must be in the county where the solar garden is located, or in an adjacent county. You can decide which garden you are interested in and contact one of the many Garden Operators developing solar gardens in Minnesota. Requirements are largely defined in Minn. Statute §216B.1641. Subscriber Requirements The following rules apply to all Solar*Rewards Community subscribers: • A subscriber must be an electric retail customer of Xcel Energy • Subscriptions must not exceed 120% of your average annual electric energy usage • Subscriptions must not exceed 40% of a single garden • Subscribers will be provided a monthly credit on their bill. The credit will be determined on a dollars per kilowatt-hours produced ($/kWh) basis by Xcel Energy. Am I eligible to receive a bill credit? What type of credit is available? Xcel Energy customers subscribing to a solar garden are eligible for a solar energy bill credit. Bill credit rates can be found in our Section 9 Tariff. The "Standard Bill Credit" is the applicable retail rate in effect at the time of energy generation. The "Enhanced Bill Credit" is the sum of the applicable Standard Bill Credit and the Commission -approved Renewable Energy Credit (REC) pricing. A Solar*Rewards Community garden electing to sell its RECs (via the Enhanced Bill Credit) to the Company for subscribed energy, shall be at the Commission -approved REC price in place on the date the garden's application is considered by the Company to be complete. How is the credit amount determined? Each month, the solar production from a community solar garden is recorded in kilowatt-hours (kWh). The production amount is then allocated, based on each customer's subscription size. The customer's bill credit is calculated by multiplying the number of kWh by the bill credit rate ($/kWh). Detailed information on the calculation of the bill credit can be found in the published Tariff on our website. Bill credits are applied to the final billed amount, after all electric charges, adjustments, riders, taxes and fees are added in. Therefore the credits will have no impact on the taxable amount owed by the subscriber. • When are credits posted? Updated 03/18/2015 Page 2 of 4 • On the ninth of every month, each subscriber's share of energy production from the community solar garden is posted to his/her account as a bill credit. Because customers are on different billing cycles, the timing for when each subscriber will see their credit depends on the day their meter is read. • If a subscriber's billing cycle (three-day, meter -reading window): • Is before the ninth of the month: the bill will reflect Solar*Rewards Community credits with a one-month lag time/delay. (For example, a September bill will show credits from July.) Is after the ninth of the month: the bill will reflect Solar*Rewards Community credits for the previous month. (For example, the September bill will show credits from August.) Contains the ninth of the month: the Solar*Rewards Community bill credit reflected may be from the previous month, or may have a one-month lag. For this small subset of subscribers, bill credits will not be reflected on their bills each and every month; some bills may include two months' worth of bill credits, while some bills may not show any credits. Xcel Energy is not able change customers' billing cycles. However, if a customer is on a meter -reading cycle that results in a bill generating on or near the ninth of the month, we have the ability to delay the creation of that bill, in order to ensure that the customer will only see one credit applied to each bill cycle. If you would like to discuss this option, please send us an email at srcmn@xcelenergy.com. While the credits are reflected differently based on the timing for each customer's bill, please remember that the Solar*Rewards Community bill credits will be posted regularly to customer accounts on the ninth of each month. How does the 120% rule apply to customers? Subscriptions must not exceed 120% of your average annual electric energy usage. If there is less than four months of consumption history, the new home calculator can be used to generate an estimate. Square Feet Range (sq. ft.) 120% Rule Equivalent (kWh) Allow PV System Size (kW) 500-1,000 5,311 4.13 1,001 — 1,500 7,318 5.69 1,501 — 2,000 10,215 7.94 2,001 — 2,500 11,018 8.57 2,501 — 3,000 12,978 10.09 3,001 — 3,500 15,618 12.14 3,501 — 4,000 14,830 11.53 4,001 — 4,500 17,887 13.91 For properties that are over 4,500 square feet, without consumption history, please submit an energy audit (HERS Rating or similar) or load calculations for the property. Please submit all system sizing paperwork to srcmn@xcelenerey.com . We use the National Renewable Energy Laboratory's (NREL) PVWatts® calculator to convert a subscriber's allocation in kW to annual output in kWh. That number is then checked against the customer's historic usage or the home usage estimator for compliance with the 120% rule. NREL's PVWatts calculator can be found on their website. Updated 03/18/2015 Page 3 of 4 How does the 40% allocation requirement work? Minn. Statute §2166.1641 defines a subscriber as "a retail customer of a utility who owns one or more subscriptions of a solar garden facility interconnected with that utility." A retail customer is a separate person or corporation and is the legal name of the party as defined by state law and existing Xcel Energy tariffs. Further, affiliates of a legal entity will be treated as the same person or entity for the purposes of subscription with the exception of government entities. Political subdivisions of a government entity or public agency can be considered separate retail customers of the utility as defined by Minn. Stat. §2166.02, Subd. 2. If a governmental agency composed of sufficient political subdivisions or agencies has a different account, each political subdivision or agency may have a 40% interest in a single garden. To provide some context as to whether or not you may be at risk for allocating more than the legislated 40% threshold, we've provided the below questions to help identify possible cases. If you answer "yes" to one or more of the below questions and intend to subscribe to 40% or more of any solar garden, we suggest you contact the S*RC team at srcmn@xcelenergy.com. We'll contact you within seven calendar days to help resolve your questions. ❑ Do you have more than one physical location to which subscriptions can be attributed? ❑ Do you have more than one account? ❑ Does the premise address on your bill differ from the billing address? ❑ Are you one of many accounts for the same type of business? ❑ Do you have political subdivisions and do you have separate financials per subdivision? 40 For further clarity, we've put together the following questions and answers about this topic: • How do I know whether or not I have multiple accounts under one legal entity? There are a couple of ways you can determine whether or not you have multiple accounts that would be combined for the purposes of the 40% requirement. First, if your bill is sent to an alternative address (versus your location) and you receive multiple bills, it is likely that you have several accounts associated with one legal entity. What is meant by "affiliates are considered the same entity"? State statute provides guidance with the definitions of "person" and "corporation", which are as follows: "Person" means a natural person, a partnership, or two or more persons having a joint or common interest, and a corporation as hereinbefore defined. (As noted in Minn. Stat. §2166.02, Subd.3) "Corporation" means a private corporation, a public corporation, a municipality, an association, a cooperative whether incorporated or not, a joint stock association, a business trust, or any political subdivision or agency. (As noted in Minn. Stat. §2166.02, Subd. 2.) Therefore, as defined by statute for our S*RC Community Program, a "person" includes corporations associations or partnerships having a "joint or common interest". Xcel Energy does not have insight into specific customer legal structures, but if your company and another company are affiliated businesses, then together these two businesses can only own up to a 40% interest in one garden. Updated 03/18/2015 0 Page 4 of 4 • As a government agency, I have different political subdivisions. Can I have a 40% interest in one garden per political subdivision? The likely answer is yes. Government entities have specific statutes that define them differently than regular "corporations". Some cities have different political subdivisions and have legal entities such as City X Fire Department and City X Libraries. Each subdivision can have a 40% interest. In order to determine if you are a political subdivision or agency, we provide guidance in the linked document. • How can I determine if there is a 'joint or common" interest between two legal entities? o If you can accurately state "yes" to all of the following, then there is no "joint or common" interest and each legal entity would be its own subscriber. You can confirm: o There is no partnership or joint venture between them? o They have not united together for the same purpose? o There is no common owner between them? o They are not part of the same corporate family— not affiliates, corporate subunits, nor otherwise related companies? o They are independent companies? Do different legal names and Federal Tax ID number constitute a different subscriber? Not necessarily. Having a different legal name and/or a different Federal Tax ID does not by itself show that these are not the same subscriber. • As an elementary school, our bills are paid by the district. Who is the "retail customer"? Generally speaking, elementary schools and high schools in the same district are considered one legal entity and therefore together could not have more than a 40% interest in one garden. What should I do if I still have questions? Most customers should have very little difficulty determining their eligibility. But if you are unsure of your legal structure, we recommend you discuss this option with your legal representative and then contact srcmn@xcelenergy.com to help determine your eligibility for Solar*Rewards Community. Updated 03/18/2015 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: July 7, 2015 w9�N�1t� V . ��c TES• OIiPORI` 1888 Agenda item #: IV. E. Action 0 Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject• Resolution No. 2015-66 Supporting Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative Affordable Housing project at 3330 66th Street in Edina. Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution supporting the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative affordable housing project at 3330 66th Street in Edina. Information/Background: Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative has submitted an application to Minnesota Housing for funding for the project. Minnesota Housing is interested in receiving Edina's support regarding the proposed development. The attached resolution would provide written support for the project. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2015-66 City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESO RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT AT 3330 66TH STREET IN EDINA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND & FINDINGS. 1.01 Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (Beacon), is proposing remodel and expand the existing TCF Bank building at 3330 66th Street, into 39 units of small studio apartments for young adults (age 18-22) who have experienced homelessness. 1.02 All of the 39 units would be considered affordable housing, and would apply towards the City and Met Council's goal for affordable housing. 1.03 Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with the • Met Council of providing 212 new affordable housing units by the year 2020. • 1.04 In 2014, the City Council amended the City's Comprehensive Plan, and rezoned the site to accommodate this project. 1.05 The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2015-43 in support to sponsor a Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Funding Application for the project. 1.06 The City Council adopted HRA Resolution No. 2015-01, which pledges a total of $550,000 to help facilitate the financing of the Project. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, supports the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative' s affordable housing project at 3330 66th Street in Edina. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-66 Page 2 C ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA • James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 7, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 0 2015. City Clerk To: Mayor and Council From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works $60 Date: 7/07/15 Subject: Request For Purchase — Todd Park Basketball Court w91�A, Cet tr5ae Agenda Item #: IV. F The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget General Information: This purchase is for the repaving of the basketball court at Todd Park. The asphalt is badly broken and in need of replacement. The Contractor will final grade and install the bituminous pavement and concrete surrounding the court. The costs of this project will be funded with the use of general funds and is within budget. These costs do not include the costs to replace the basketball hoops which is expected to cost an additional $11,000. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: 6/30/15 7/26/15 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Tennis West $35,970.00 Bituminous Roadways, Inc. $52,481.50 { Midwest Asphalt Corporation $65,1 16,25 Recommended Quote or Bid: Tennis West General Information: This purchase is for the repaving of the basketball court at Todd Park. The asphalt is badly broken and in need of replacement. The Contractor will final grade and install the bituminous pavement and concrete surrounding the court. The costs of this project will be funded with the use of general funds and is within budget. These costs do not include the costs to replace the basketball hoops which is expected to cost an additional $11,000. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 s'VNINIIIMWN[ IMm9NMYW.-"11 I- 1+ " Vf_0W `: V7 V0 �S nAOAZ z zzo Zzm a�C s PUN .i MEE TED BY K Co TODD PARK U ANDMx DEAN A DDLY 9q1 ANO MDT I AM A DULY �N EA TMERIAASSa 1 E ST-. BASKETBALL COURT i' N�!NESlJ�D ot,E .D IMPROVEMENT C ? ^ e4ti� � ' � o � M � � o N w w54 s - O ® O O Ro00 9 n n n 0OD0w M ~ A a g > CITY OF EDINA 7450 METRO BOULEVARD EDNA. M8 55439-3037 PA: 952-826-0371 F- 952-826-0392 PROPOSED SEQ c mr41 ;r� iN SN zmyy n Z m C z C r Z m N O N • is • lilli kill Hll dP Q„ 11 11 S S E L L S 8 Id d j o m �p 3 m N ECE CC CC F ou�i9 O H I- 1+ " Vf_0W `: V7 V0 �S nAOAZ z zzo Zzm a�C s PUN .i MEE TED BY K Co TODD PARK U ANDMx DEAN A DDLY 9q1 ANO MDT I AM A DULY �N EA TMERIAASSa 1 E ST-. BASKETBALL COURT i' N�!NESlJ�D ot,E .D IMPROVEMENT C ? ^ e4ti� � ' � o � M � � o N w w54 s - O ® O O Ro00 9 n n n 0OD0w M ~ A a g > CITY OF EDINA 7450 METRO BOULEVARD EDNA. M8 55439-3037 PA: 952-826-0371 F- 952-826-0392 PROPOSED SEQ c mr41 ;r� iN SN zmyy n Z m C z C r Z m N O N • is • dP Q„ I- 1+ " Vf_0W `: V7 V0 �S nAOAZ z zzo Zzm a�C s PUN .i MEE TED BY K Co TODD PARK U ANDMx DEAN A DDLY 9q1 ANO MDT I AM A DULY �N EA TMERIAASSa 1 E ST-. BASKETBALL COURT i' N�!NESlJ�D ot,E .D IMPROVEMENT C ? ^ e4ti� � ' � o � M � � o N w w54 s - O ® O O Ro00 9 n n n 0OD0w M ~ A a g > CITY OF EDINA 7450 METRO BOULEVARD EDNA. M8 55439-3037 PA: 952-826-0371 F- 952-826-0392 PROPOSED SEQ c mr41 ;r� iN SN zmyy n Z m C z C r Z m N O N • is • 0 • To: Mayor and Council From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works EEO Date: 7/07/15 Subject: Request For Purchase — West Parking Lot Van Valkenburg Park Date Bid Opened or Quote Received 6/26/15 Company: Ace Asphalt Paving Contractors Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Midwest Asphalt Corporation Recommended Quote or Bid: Ace Asphalt Paving Contractors w91NA, �l� e o t • '',CpRPOtiI`��O • 1000 Agenda Item #: IV. G The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: 7/26/15 Amount of Quote or Bid: $78,626.79 $79,895.00 $82,812.00 $92,800.00 General Information: This purchase is for the repaving of the west parking lot at Van Valkenburg Park. The asphalt is badly broken and in need of replacement. The removal of the existing bituminous and rough grading will be completed with the use of internal Staff and equipment to help reduce the costs of this project. The Contractor will final grade and install the bituminous pavement. The costs of this project will be funded with the use of general funds and is within budget. I City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. - Edina, MN 55424 r From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Brian E. Olson, PE. Director of Public Works Date: July 7, 2015 Agenda Item M IV. H The Recommended Bid is X] Within Budget Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Bid Contract ENG 15-1 1 2015 Sealcoating Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: June 24, 2015 Company: Allied Blacktop Company Recommended Quote or Bid: Allied Blacktop Company Bid or Expiration Date: August 24, 2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $154,820.00 $154,820.00 General Information: Streets are designed for anticipated traffic volumes and vehicles loads. An increase in load or volume, outside of the original design assumptions, reduces the service life of the pavement. Streets are designed for approximately a 25 -year service life without any maintenance. With specific maintenance operations at key points in the life of a pavement, service life can be extended to at least to 40 -years and possibly as long as 60 -years. Street maintenance staff uses these practices to extend pavement service life: crack sealing, seal coating, edge mill and overlay, and full mill and overlay. Sealcoating is a process of placing oil and rock to make the pavements more watertight. This is typically done as the first maintenance operation within the first 7-10 years. A location map is attached and Staff is recommending utilization of the existing budget to pay for these improvements. As indicated in the work session, Staff had originally identified a need of $100,000 for sealcoating so this will decrease the money available for overlays in 2015. Staff recommends awarding the 2015 Sealcoating Improvements to Allied Blacktop Company to include the 50th and France Business District, Todd Park A, and Lake Cornelia C neighborhoods. G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PR0JECTS\C0NTRACTS\2015\ENG 15-11 Sea Icoating\ADMIN\Item IV. x. ENG 15-11 RFP.docx 0 0 VI7,YiVY00 YXV7 NOIl VO07 1O►71'OWd ►70A1 Vdd -Y HSL 0! ATOII VJ07 10,71'02 • • To: City Council From: MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Date: July 7, 2015 Subject: Human Rights and Relations resignation. Action Requested: Accept resignation of Commissioner Tiffany Sanders from the HRRC. A, )Ll� r1 o Ce: :i �Ptr� Cn • JNmRF'C�ItATFO • IHRN Agenda Item #: IV. I. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information I Background: City staff received a resignation letter from Tiffany Sanders, Human Rights and Relations Commission. The City Council selected HRRC alternate has already been appointed to fill an un -scheduled vacancy which occurred prior to this resignation. City staff recommends leaving seat open until annual on -boarding in March. Attachment. Resignation Letter. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MJ Lamon From: Tiffany Sanders <tiff.sanders@msn.com> • Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 4:32 PM To: MJ Lamon; 'Pat Arseneault' Subject: Notice of Resignation from HRRC Commission MJ and Pat: Due to my continued health issues, I am unable to fulfill my obligations as a HRRC Commissioner. Please accept this email as my notice of resignation from the HRRC Commission. I wish both of you, and the Commission, all the best. Thank you, Tiffany Sanders • To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Date: July 7, 2015 Subject: Public Art Purchase — 3 Dancing Sand Hill Cranes Sculpture • ��ooRroxA"�w� • IBAA Agenda Item #: IV.J. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Motion to approve the purchase of the "3 Dancing Sand Hill Cranes" for $6,500. Information / Background: At the June 17 City Council Meeting, Council Member Swenson asked for the Council to consider the purchase of the "3 Dancing Sand Hill Cranes" sculpture as part of the Promenade Phase IV project. Council directed staff to see if the sculpture was available for purchase and at what price. Staff has confirmed that the sculpture is available for purchase from its owner Mr. Jim Dehne at the price of $6,500. If the Council approves this action, I recommend the $12,500 Meissinger Construction settlement the source of revenue for this expense. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 0 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Le Cn 0 • /��Y)R 6URA��p • Agenda Item #: V.I. A. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: July 7, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015-67 Approving Issuance of Bonds By Minneapolis On Behalf Of Fairview Health Services Action Requested: Hold a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2015-67 Approving Issuance of Bonds By Minneapolis On Behalf Of Fairview Health Services. Information I Background: Fairview Health Services and the City of Minneapolis have reached out to the City of Edina regarding a financing for Fairview being undertaken by the City of Minneapolis. Since a portion of the facilities proposed to be financed and refinanced by the bonds are located at the Southdale campus in Edina, Edina's consent is needed in order to issue the bonds. The bonds are not being issued by the City of Edina and are not an obligation of the City of Edina. Edina's bond attorney and financial advisors are aware of the proposed financing and have not raised any issues. City staff has asked for a representative from Fairview Health Services and a representative from Dorsey & Whitney to be present for the public hearing. Attachment: Resolution No. 2015-67 Approving Issuance of Bonds By Minneapolis On Behalf Of Fairview Health Services. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Resolution No. 2015-67 • RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS ON BEHALF OF FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152 TO 469. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: SECTION 1 Recitals and Findinas 1.1. This Council has received a proposal from Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ("Fairview"), that the City authorize the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "Minneapolis") to issue its bonds (the "Bonds"), under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165 (the "Act"), on behalf of Fairview, in order to (a) refund the Health Care System Revenue Bonds, Series 1997A (Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services) previously issued by the Minnesota Agricultural and Economic Development Board (the "Board"), a portion of which were used to refund bonds issued by the City and finance the construction of improvements to Fairview Southdale Hospital, an acute care hospital and other health care -related facilities owned and operated by the Corporation and located at 6401 and 6400 France Avenue South in the City (the "Edina Facilities") and the acquisition and installation of equipment therein; (b) refund the Health Care • System Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A (Fairview Health Services) (the "Series 2000A Bonds") issued by the Board, a portion of which were used to finance an addition to the Edina Facilities and construction of a new parking ramp to serve the Edina Facilities; (c) refund all or a portion of the Health Care System Revenue Bonds (Fairview Health Services), Series 2005D issued by Minneapolis for the purpose of financing the construction of improvements to and remodeling of the Edina Facilities and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment therein; and (d) finance a project consisting of, among other things, the acquisition, improvement and equipping of the Edina Facilities, including the construction of a new and expanded emergency department (the "Project"). The Bonds are proposed to be issued as part of a larger bond issue by Minneapolis in an aggregate amount which is not expected to exceed $135,000,000, the proceeds of which will be issued to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, renovation, remodeling and equipping by Fairview or its affiliates of health care facilities, located in the cities of Minneapolis, Red Wing, Hibbing, Wyoming, Chisago City and Burnsville, Minnesota, as well as the City. 1.2. At a public hearing held on the date hereof, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal that Minneapolis issue its Bonds, pursuant to the Act, for the purposes described in Section 1. 1, and interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Manager before the time of the hearing. is REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 10 SECTION 2 Approvals 2.1. The issuance of the Bonds by Minneapolis, pursuant to the Act, in a principal amount of up to $135,000,000, to finance and refinance the Edina Facilities and to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, renovation, remodeling and equipping by the Corporation or its affiliates of health care facilities, located in the cities of Minneapolis, Red Wing, Hibbing, Wyoming, Chisago City and Burnsville, Minnesota, as well as the City, is hereby consented to and approved. The terms of the Bonds shall be as are approved by the Minneapolis City Council. 2.2. The Mayor and City Manager and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to furnish to Fairview, Minneapolis and the attorneys rendering an opinion on the issuance of the Bonds by Minneapolis, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the bonds and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officer's custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina this 7th day of July, 2015. • Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 7, 2015 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 0 City Clerk • �A N \CORPORA�� 1484 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.B. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑x Discussion ❑x Date: July 7, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Rezoning from R-1, to R-2 with Lot Area and Width Variances, Mathias Mortenson; 3923 49`h Street. Ordinance No. 2015-09 and Resolution No. 2015-68. Action Requested: Staff and Planning Commission Recommendation: Waive second reading and adopt Resolution No. 2015-68 and Ordinance 2015-09 approving the Rezoning to R-2, Double Dwelling Units District with Lot Area and Width Variances. Information/Background: (Deadline for a City Council Decision — September I, 2015) Mathias Mortenson is requesting a rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District to tear down the existing single-family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. The property is located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and east of a four-story apartment building. To accommodate the request the applicant is requesting the following: ➢ Rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District; ➢ Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; ➢ Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; The applicant made a similar request in 2014 that was denied by the City Council. The denial of that rezoning centered on the variances associated with the size of the structure proposed. (See attached minutes on pages A36 -A42 of the Planning Commission staff report.) The previous request included variances for building coverage and side yard setback requirements. The building coverage variance was from 25% to 32%, and the side yard setback variance from 10 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. There also were retaining wall setback variances proposed. The applicant has revised the plans so that there are no variances associated with the proposed structure; the request is now only for the rezoning of property and the lot area and width requirements. The applicant has hired a professional engineer do the grading, stormwater management and erosion control plan. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION • ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2015-68 & Ordinance 2015-09 • Planning Commission minutes, June 10, 2015 • Planning Commission staff report dated June 10, 2015 C • Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-68 APPROVING A REZONING FROM R-1 TO R-2 WITH; LOT AREA AND WIDTH VARAINCES AT 3923 49TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mathias Mortenson is proposing to tear down a single-family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. The property is legally described as follows: Lot 32, Auditor's Subd. No. 172 1.02 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: 1. A Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District; 2. Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; 3. Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; • 1.04 On June 10, 2015 the PlanningCommission held a public hearing and recommended approval P g of the requested rezoning and variances. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. • 1.05 On July 7, 2014, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan guides this site for low density attached residential which is described as "two-family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts." The proposed rezoning precisely fits this category. 2.02 The rezoning criteria per Section 36-216 of the City Code is found to be met. 3. The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single-family and two-family dwellings; however, two dwelling units are the predominant uses on this block. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 . Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-68 Page 2 • 4. The findings for variance regarding the lot area and width are found to be met as follows: a. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the existing home adjacent to a duplex to the west, and apartment building to the east, and commercial property to the south. This is site is better fitted as a transitional zone (duplex) between commercial property to the south and single family homes to the north. It is reasonable for this site to function as a transitional area. b. The circumstance of the undersized lot is not unique to this neighborhood. There are several undersized R-2 lots on this block. These circumstances however are unique in regard to other R-2 property in Edina. C. The variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Rezoning and Lot Area and Width Variances at 3923 49th Street. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: • 1. Any new structure on this property shall conform to the minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements of R-2 Zoning District. 2. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated June 3, 2015. 3. Any new duplex structure would be required to be installed with a fire sprinkler system, per the state building code. 0 • 40 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-68 Page 3 Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on July 7, 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 7, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2015. City Clerk • ORDINANCE NO. 2015-09 AN ORDINANCE REZONING 3923 49TH STREET FROM R-1, SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO R-2, TWO -DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. The subject property is hereby rezoned from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Two Dwelling Unit District based on the following findings: w 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan guides this site for low density attached residential which is described as "two-family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts." The proposed rezoning precisely fits this category. 2. The rezoning criteria per Section 36-216 of the City Code is found to be met. 3. The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single-family and two-family dwellings; however, two dwelling units are the predominant uses on this block. Section 2. The subject property is legally described as follows: Lot 32, Auditor's Subd. No. 172. is 9 • Section 3. The official zoning map of the City of Edina referred to and described in Section 36.402 of the Edina City Code shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the zoning map on file in the City Clerk's office shall be appropriately marked for the purpose of indicating the rezoning provided for in this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2015 City Clerk • front yard setbacks if the adjacent house faces that side street. Aaker concluded that the intent of the Code was to maintain the streetscape. Applicant Presentation Mr. Busyn reported that he held a neighborhood meeting to inform neighbors of their intent to tear down the existing home and construct a new home. Busyn said that the plan for the new home allows for the creation of more functional rear yards for the three adjoining properties. He also noted that currently the site is in disrepair and will be "cleaned up". Continuing, Busyn said the new house would conform to the Tree Ordinance. Chair Platteter asked Mr. Busyn if he worked with the adjoining neighbor on the existing retaining wall and driveway. Busyn responded in the affirmative. He added he is in contact with that neighbor and is keeping him "in the loop" on the drainage and landscaping plans. Public Comment Mr. Cobb, 5117 Wooddale Glen was present representing himself and property owners at 51 19 Wooddale Glen and 5113 Wooddale Avenue. Cobb fir; essed the Commission and informed them he supports th+�.project as submitted and,is pleased with the density of house and overall look of the project. He further added the; plans as submitted will "clean up" this corner and will enhance.t only the site but the entire neighborhood. • Commissioner Tho, moved to close the -public hearing. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion; all voted R; motion carried. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to sta.#fconditions including capping the building height at 32 -feet, adding an additional suggestion that every effort is made to save the large Oak tree. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. G. B. Rezoning with Variances. M. Mortenson. 3923 49th St West, Edina, MN Q\�l`D'�anner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Mathias Mortenson is requesting a rezoning from R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District to tear down the existing single-family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. The property is located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and east of a four-story apartment building. To accommodate the request the applicant is • requesting the following: ➢ Rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District; Page 4 of 10 • ➢ Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; ➢ Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; Teague reminded the Commission the applicant made a similar request in 2014 that was denied by the City Council. The denial of that rezoning centered on the variances associated with the size of the structure proposed. The planning commission recommended approval of the rezoning of the property from R- I to R-2. The previous request included variances for building coverage and side yard setback requirements. The building coverage variance was from 25% to 32%, and the side yard setback variance from 10 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. There also were retaining wall setback variances proposed. Teague reported that the applicant has revised the plans so that there are no variances associated with the proposed structure: the request is now only for the rezoning of property and the lot area and width requirements. The applicant has hired a professional engineer do the grading, stormwater management and erosion control plan. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Rezoning and lot area and width variances at 3923 49`h Street. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan • guides this site for low density attached residential which is described as "two-family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts." The proposed rezoning precisely fits this category. 2. The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single-family and two-family dwellings; however, two dwelling units are the predominant uses on this block. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: I. Any new structure on this property shall conform to the minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements of R-2 Zoning District. 2. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated June 3, 2015. 3. Any new duplex structure would be required to be installed with a fire sprinkler system, per the state building code. Appearing for the Applicant • Mathias Mortenson, applicant Page 5 of 10 • Discussion Commissioner Thorsen asked Planner Teague if there are other similar "areas" in Edina. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. He noted there is a similar pocket on West 54`h Street that's a mixture of single and double dwelling units, adding there are other similar pockets throughout the City. Commissioner Lee questioned lot coverage. Planner Teague responded that lot coverage is at 25%. Applicant Presentation Mr. Mortenson addressed the Commission and reported since his last appearance before the Commission he revised his plans and eliminated the need for variances as per concerns raised by the Commission. Mortenson said most of the concerns expressed by the Commission centered on the size of the proposed structure and the variances needed to build the structure. Mortenson stated he revised the plans and reduced the size of the structure eliminating the variances. Continuing, Mortenson said his goal in redeveloping this property was to provide a housing type absent from the city's housing stock, one that accommodates the needs of an aging population in place. Concluding, Mortenson further reported that his project aims to be constructed at the highest standards of sustainability. • Commissioner Forrest questioned if with the revisions light access continues to be available for the proposed solar panels. Mr. Mortenson responded in the affirmative. Forrest further commented that she was a little concerned that the proposed "caregiver space" could become separate living quarters. Planner Teague responded the request is for two (2) dwelling units; not four (4), adding the caregiver space does not contain a kitchen and would not be considered another dwelling. Forrest asked Mr. Mortenson if that was understood. Mortenson said he has no problem with two units; adding that was his intention and what's proposed. Commissioner Lee commented that in her opinion when she viewed the plans she thought the interior clearance may not meet ADA standards. She further questioned building height. Mr. Mortenson acknowledged it did take him some time to revise the plans reducing the square footage; however, it was accomplished and the schematic does meet ADA standards. With regard to building height, the previous roof was a gable; the present roof is a hip. Concluding, Lee questioned drainage. Mortenson responded that the site will drain to the respective rain gardens. Public Testimony Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. LJI Page 6 of 10 • Jim Stromberg, 3930 49`h Street West expressed his support for the project. He said one of the reasons he moved into this neighborhood was because of the mixed housing opportunities. Chair Platteter asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Carr complimented the applicant on listening to Commission comments by eliminating the variances for the structure, adding sustainability and addressing the need for this type of housing unit is a plus for the City of Edina A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging the changes to the plans that reduced building size; thereby eliminating the need for structure variances was a positive step. It was further acknowledged that the variances required for the rezoning were reasonable noting that the majority of doubles in this neighborhood are beneath the minimum standard square footage (15,000 sq. ft.) for a double dwelling unit. Sustainability was also a huge plus; however, Commissioners did further reiterate for the applicant that the subject site is two units only. Motion • Commissioner Nemerov moved to approve the request for rezoning subject to staff findings and staff conditions. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. Commissioner Lee thanked the neighbor for his comment; however, indicated that as proposed she can't support the request; it's just too much for the site in her opinion Commissioner Forrest stated she supports the project as presented, adding the revision to one driveway; not two as previously proposed was beneficial Chair Platteter commented that he too can support the rezoning; adding Edina could use more of this type of housing. Chair Platteter called the vote. Ayes; Hobbs, Thorsen, Strauss, Olsen, Nemerov, Carr, Forrest, Platteter. Nay; Lee. Motion carried. VI1. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Consideration of Development Principles for the Southdale France Avenue Area • Planner Teague repo°d that members of the Southdale FranceAienue Area Working Group are present this e ing to introduce to the Commission the" ""gEuiding principles" for the area. Page 7 of 10 f° Jk„+ • 0 o e Cn PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 10, 2015 VI.B. Community Development Director INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Project Description Mathias Mortenson is requesting a rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District to tear down the existing single- family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. (See property location on pages Al—A5, and the applicant's plans and narrative on pages A6 -A33.) The property is located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and east of a four-story apartment building. To accommodate the request the applicant is requesting the following: ➢ Rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District; ➢ Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; ➢ Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; The applicant made a similar request in 2014 that was denied by the City Council. The denial of that rezoning centered on the variances associated with the size of the structure proposed. (See attached minutes on pages A36 -A42.) The planning commission recommended approval of the rezoning of the property from R-1 to R-2. (See pages A36 -A40.) The previous request included variances for building coverage and side yard setback requirements. The building coverage variance was from 25% to 32%, and the side yard setback variance from 10 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. There also were retaining wall setback variances proposed. The applicant has revised the plans so that there are no variances associated with the proposed structure; the request is now only for the rezoning of property and the lot area and width requirements. The applicant has hired a professional engineer do the grading, stormwater management and erosion control plan. 0 • SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A single family home; zoned R-1 Single -Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Attached Residential. Easterly: Apartment building; zoned PRD -4, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Southerly: Vacant property (formerly Edina Realty); zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and Guided Mixed Use, MXC. Westerly: A single story double dwelling unit; zoned R-2 Double -Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Attached Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 8,816 square feet in size, and contains a two-story single family home. The site is elevated above the two-family dwelling to the west. (See pages A3 and A31.) Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Grading/Drainage/Utilities Low Density Attached Residential R-2, Double -Dwelling District The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans, and does have some concern in regard to drainage in the driveway and window well. (See condition #3 on page A35 of the engineering memo.) These areas should include either positive grade away from the foundation or be connect to drainage system that drains away. Approval of this request would be conditioned on meeting the conditions in the engineering memo. This is also a building code requirement to be addressed at the time of building permit. (See page A43.) Proposed Floor Plans The plans show a lower level studio within each unit that could easily be designed as additional units within the structure. These two "studios" are separated from the rest of the living units. To access the upper units from these lower studios, a person would have to walk outside or through the garage. (See page A20.) Should the applications be approved, a condition should be included that these not become separate dwelling units. 2 • Compliance Table *Variance Required Rezoning Per Section 36-216 of the City Code, the commission may recommend approval by the council based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: • (1) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides this site for low density attached residential which is described as "two-family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts." The proposed rezoning precisely fits this category. (2) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract. The proposed use is consistent with the duplexes that exist on this block. (3) Will not result in an overly intensive land use. Again, this use is allowed in the Comprehensive Plan, and exists on adjacent property. (4) Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. • The increase of one housing unit would not result in traffic congestion or traffic hazards. City Standard (R-2) Proposed Building Setbacks 30 feet 10 feet 10 feet 35 feet 35 feet structure 30 feet patio 13 feet 12 feet 36 feet Front Side Side Rear Lot Width 90 feet 65 feet* Lot Area 15,000 square feet 8,816 square feet* Building Height 30 feet 27 feet Building Coverage 25% 25% *Variance Required Rezoning Per Section 36-216 of the City Code, the commission may recommend approval by the council based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: • (1) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides this site for low density attached residential which is described as "two-family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts." The proposed rezoning precisely fits this category. (2) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract. The proposed use is consistent with the duplexes that exist on this block. (3) Will not result in an overly intensive land use. Again, this use is allowed in the Comprehensive Plan, and exists on adjacent property. (4) Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. • The increase of one housing unit would not result in traffic congestion or traffic hazards. • (5) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code. Any new structure would conform to the minimum zoning ordinance standards of the R-2 Zoning Districts. The provisions that to not meet code, are the existing lot area and width. (6) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. The site provides a proper transition in land use from the commercial district to the south to the single family homes to the north. There are no open spaces or natural features in the immediate area. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed Rezoning from R-1 to R-2 is reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Rezoning is reasonable for the following • reasons: As highlighted above, the criteria per Section 36-216 of the City Code, when considering a rezoning, is found to be met. 2. The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single-family and two-family dwellings. (See pages A4 and A23 -A33.) Two dwelling units are the predominant uses on this block. 3. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided for Low Density Attached Residential. The proposed duplex would fit that category. Duplexes serve as a transitional land use area between the commercial properties to the south and the single-family residential area to the north. 4. The Planning Commission and City Council found that the rezoning of the site was reasonable during the review of a similar request for this site in 2014. (See minutes on pages A36 -A40.) • Are the proposed lot size variances reasonable for this site? is Yes. Staff believes that the proposed Variances are reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 4 • 1. Duplexes are common on this block. The majority of the block consists of property zoned R-2. (See page A4.) The adjacent property to the west is a duplex zoned R-2, and the property to east is an apartment building zoned PRD -4, Multi -Family Residential. 2. While the lot is small, so are all the other lots that are zoned R-2. There is not one lot on 49th that meets the minimum 15,000 square foot lot size. 3. The variance criteria are met. Per state law and the Edina Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying • with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the existing home adjacent to a duplex to the west, and apartment building to the east, and commercial property to the south. This is site is better fitted as a transitional zone (duplex) between commercial property to the south and single family homes to the north. It is reasonable for this site to function as that transitional area. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstance of the undersized lot is not unique to this neighborhood. There are several undersized R-2 lots on this block. (See page 34.) These circumstances however are unique in regard to other R-2 property in Edina. c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed structure meets the zoning regulations of the R-2 District, and duplexes are common on the south side of the street. • 5 • Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed Rezoning and lot area and width variances at 3923 49t" Street. Approval is based on the following findings: Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan guides this site for low density attached residential which is described as "two- family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts." The proposed rezoning precisely fits this category. 2. As highlighted on pages 3-4 of the Planning Commission staff report, the rezoning criteria per Section 36-216 of the City Code is found to be met. 3. The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single-family and two-family dwellings; however, two dwelling units are the predominant uses on this block. 4. The findings for variance regarding the lot area and width are found to be met as follows: a. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the existing home adjacent to a duplex to the west, and apartment building to the east, and commercial property to the south. This is site is better fitted as a transitional zone (duplex) between commercial property to the south and single family homes to the north. It is reasonable for this site to function as a transitional area. b. The circumstance of the undersized lot is not unique to this neighborhood. There are several undersized R-2 lots on this block. These circumstances however are unique in regard to other R-2 property in Edina. c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Any new structure on this property shall conform to the minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements of R-2 Zoning District. 2. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated June 3, 2015. 3. Any new duplex structure would be required to be installed with a fire sprinkler system, per the state building code. Deadline for a city decision: September 1, 2015 �J 7 • • • 4>=Tti 5TVV 48TH ST W- -7- t _ I J iz _ c 49TH ST'dv' - Uj I - - -912�5TlMt 50TH ST W W I li 1 I, _-k _1 ti Z 51ST ST W LL. z _+ ' x st -- i moi' a f I ... - LU - — - -- i .J Parcel 18-028-24-14-0027 A -T -B: ID: Owner Baker Bean Llc Market Name: Total: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Residential Sale Type: Price: Home- Sale stead: Date: Parcel 0.21 acres Sale Area: 9,086 sq ft Code: a ST W Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. N Print Date: 1/14/2014 )V This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A lhirk Green! 0 • 4005 {{; 3949 3945 3941 3937 3927 392 3901 24 24 3948 13944 u 24 4100 < x 24 ' 3936 1 3930 139181 4916 4809 - - Parcel 4813 4812 Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N 4817 18-028-24-14-0027 4817 4800 4821 ID: 4824 4825 4830 4829 if 4846 4800 4833 ! I i 4825 ( Name: 48 50 Total: _ _ _ 3940 ;938 3932 Parcel 9223918 Tax 4832 4837 Edina, MN 55424 4837 1 i 4854 4836 Property 4837 4841 4005 {{; 3949 3945 3941 3937 3927 392 3901 24 24 3948 13944 u 24 4100 < x 24 ' 3936 1 3930 139181 4916 49 1/2 ST W 4924 4925 - -- - -- 4928 4929 ! i 4930 j 4932 4933 ! 24 24 i 24 3925 - I 4999 4936 ` 4937 f -- - - -- 4941 4948 4945 3808 3--3 1 3924 3922; 3906 - i 'r 390 ! 3724 ST ti;d Parcel 4813 Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N 18-028-24-14-0027 4817 4800 ID: 4821 ; if Print Date: 1/14/2014 4800 Market i 4825 Name: Total: 4829 Parcel 4833 - -i Tax 4832 4833 Edina, MN 55424 4837 4836 Property 4837 4841 4840 4841 _-_ 4844 Type: 4845 Price: 4845 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- 4848 484'9 4853 stead: 4852 j 1_ 4853 49TH ST 10; i 4901 purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and 4900 I 4901 4905 Parcel 4904 490 Sale 5 4909 9,086 sq ft 4908 4SO9 — I 4912 A Tliir,4 Green! 4915 — 4917 4916 4917 4921 4920 4921 49 1/2 ST W 4924 4925 - -- - -- 4928 4929 ! i 4930 j 4932 4933 ! 24 24 i 24 3925 - I 4999 4936 ` 4937 f -- - - -- 4941 4948 4945 3808 3--3 1 3924 3922; 3906 - i 'r 390 ! 3724 W ST ti;d Parcel Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N 18-028-24-14-0027 A -T -B: ID: Print Date: 1/14/2014 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Sale Residential Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.21 acres Sale Area: 9,086 sq ft , Code: COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Tliir,4 Green! W • 0 • F i :�; � " � fir•^ � : , � ,� '� �' . r Parcel Map Scale: V = 100 ft. ID: 18-028-24-14-0027 A -T -B: Print Date: 1/14/2014 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Tax 4ddress: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Residential Sale A` N Type. Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.21 acres Sale Area: 9,086 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Thunk Green! A3 • • • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 6' DUCRLE IRON PIPE WAiERMAiN� R 49 i T S TR EETI\WEST RIN 894.10SERVICE INV = 886.1 X0; A —>—>—> >—�=>�—>X>—>>�>—>—> X >—>—>_ / 9' VITREOUS CLAY PIPE PREPARED FOR: MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 4"5- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. LEGEND: FOUND IRON MONUMEM (AS NOTED) x{ POWER POLE (Wmi OUT ANCHOR) • DECIDUOUS -.-TREE (SIZE IN INCHES) r O4 OVERHEAD UDUTY UNEP ,. ,V/ WAIERMAIN /SANITARY SEWER UNE �/ tMTURAI OAS UNE 0 /UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION UNE NOTES: 1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. 2)ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: 3923 49TH STREET WEST, EDNA, MN 55410 P.I. D.:18-028-24-14-0027 3) PARCEL AREA: 8,816 SQ. FT. 4) BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. 5) DATE OF FIELDWORK: 2-11-2013 6) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT AT SW CORNER OF FRANCEAVE AND 49TH STREET WEST. ELEVATION = 887.72 (NGVD) HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS: HOUSE:642 SQ. FT GARAGE: 456 SQ. FT. CONCRETE: 1,704 SQ. FT. TOTAL HARDCOVER: 2,802 SO. FT OR 31.8% J CERTIFICATION -..�.✓'/ I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. • • • H•M•M• design collaborative 3923 49`h STREET - DOUBLE DWELLING 612.655.3745 Rezoning Application 2429 Sheridan Ave. S OF,dina, Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55405 ay8, 2015 www.hmmarch.com PROJECT INTRODUCTION The proposed project is a new 2 -story double dwelling unit on 491h Street. The location is one block north of 50th and France on a street that predominantly consists of double dwelling units. The lot is currently zoned R- 1, thus requiring a re -zoning to R-2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The property at 3923 491h Street is highly unusual. First, it is a single-family lot situated on a street that is predominantly double dwellings. More critically, it is adjacent to a high-density 4 -story apartment building, two commercial properties, and one double dwelling unit. This sets it apart from any other lot on 49th Street and, indeed, from most other lots throughout the city. In addition, it is cradled by a Height Overlay District that allows adjacent properties to build up to 48' high. A thorough survey of the city and its Height Overlay Districts (See Attachment A), reveals that there are only eight other residential properties in this situation and that, of those eight, only two adjoin HOD's of 48 feet or greater. While those final two are both zoned R-1, neither sits on a street that is predominantly comprised of R-2 lots. In other words, for a variety of reasons, this lot is an anomaly, completely unique in the city. For these reasons, and others, it is our hope that the City shares our view that our project's proposed re -zoning and associated variances are justified by the unusual conditions of the site. Finally, we submit two of our Crimary project goals which we believe align well with the City's housing goals as outlined in the omprehensive Plan: PROJECT GOAL #1: ACCESSIBILITY The owner is seeking to provide a housing type largely absent from the city's housing stock, one that accommodates the particular needs of an aging population. Although, the owner is driven by an interest in homesteading in one of the units, the design also coincides perfectly with the city's own interests. According to the Comprehensive Plan "The challenge for the city is to adapt itself as a lifecycle community to conform to the needs of a changing population" (p.40), and that change is principally happening to the +65 demographic where growth is expected to exceed 100% by 2030 (CP, p. 24). The proposed development would add exactly this challenge through a number of means: 1. All necessities (kitchen, bath, laundry, etc.) would be provided for on a single level 2. An elevator would connect the below grade parking to the upper two floors 3. The main bathroom would include ADA accessible fixturesQy 4. ADA turning radii and clearances provided where necessary ©� 5. A basement studio that could serve as living quarters for in-home care, �� C� PROJECT GOAL #2: SUSTAINABILITY The project aims to achieve the highest standard of sustainability. It will incorporate rooftop solar panels that are expected to supply the entire electrical needs for both units. The building will also employ advanced framing techniques to achieve a 25% reduction in lumber consumption and 5% increase in energy efficiency. ,WLhermore conventional sustainability measures will include high efficiency glazing, permeable pavers, erials with recycled content and low -flow fixtures, among others. A 0 0 • • •H•M•M• design collaborative 3923 49`h STREET - DOUBLE DWELLING 612.655.3745 Rezoning Application 2429 Sheridan Ave. S Edina, Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55405 May 8, 2015 www.hmmorch.com ZONING NARRATIVE: The proposed development seeks rezoning from R-1 to R-2 • Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The City of Edina, per its Comprehensive Plan, regards this type of use to be both reasonable and favorable. It specifically encourages it in a variety of ways, promoting a building that: 1. Is consistent with the character of the district: • The block is considered a 'Traditional Neighborhood' where the 'relatively smaller lots' have not historically prohibited use as double -dwellings (CP, ch. 4, 4-9) • The project would continue the pattern of 'integration of multi -unit housing at the edge of a commercial district' (CP, ch. 4, 4-27 + 4-43) 2. Serves as a transitional use between 50th and France and single-family zones: • Duplexes have historically served "as a kind of buffer or transition to the adjacent single-family housing." (CP, ch. 4, 4-43) • "...Historical role...as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts." (CP, ch. 4, 4-27) 3. Supports plans for future growth: • The property is included in an LDAR district (CP, see 4-27 + Fig. 4.6A) • 4. Provide appropriate and desired level of density: • "As Edina plans for current and future residents, it should focus on .... developing transition strategies to increase density and encourage infill development" (CP, ch. 3, 3.2) • Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract The property adheres to all setbacks and height restrictions and otherwise maintains or improves upon existing conditions as they relate to shading, drainage, landscaping, etc. Increased occupant parking needs related to the double dwelling are provided for on-site, below grade. • Will not result in an overly -intensive land use The proposed building footprint is complies with the required minimum lot coverage of 25%. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards a. The property is on a side street with low traffic levels. • Conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code a. The property adheres to all setbacks and height restrictions. Variances are sought for non- conforming conditions triggered by the re -zoning (see variance application) • Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, Pace and natural features. �e a. The proposed structure will be lower and smaller than the structures to�thpe' nand eat It is comparable in scale and mass to similar recent developments on the str�fet at 400��1924/3930 • as well as to the double dwelling directly across the street at 3900 (see pictures)*p 2 • • •H•M•M• 0 0 design collaborative 3923 49h STREET - DOUBLE DWELLING 612.655.3745 Rezoning Application 2429 Sheridan Ave. S Edina, Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55405 May 8, 2015 www.hmmarch.com VARIANCE NARRATIVE: The proposed development seeks variances for two non -conforming conditions triggered by the re -zoning: lot width and lot area. 1. Minimum Lot Width —current= 65.5'; required= 90' 2. Minimum Lot Area — current = 8,816 SF; required = 15,000 SF • Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance that the use is reasonable 1. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by the ordinance: The most reasonable use for the property in question is as a double dwelling unit. • The predominant use of properties in the neighborhood are as double dwellings. The lot at 3923 is one of only four lots fronting the street that are zoned R-1. The remaining eleven lots are zoned R-2, constituting almost three-quarters of the block. Additionally, one corner lot at France Ave. serves as a twelfth R-2 lot, while the other corner lot is zoned PRD -4 and hosts a four-story, x -unit apartment building. Thus, the block is substantially comprised of properties that support higher densities than a single-family dwelling unit. 2. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to his/her property which were not created by the petitioner: • The 3923 property is unique as one of the few remaining single-family lots in the 0 neighborhood. And although it would technically be non -conforming as an R-2 property (it would not meet the minimum lot width or the minimum lot area requirements and the maximum building coverage), it would not be unique as a non -conforming R-2 parcel. All the existing double dwelling units on the block are also non -conforming in one way or another. Of the 11 R-2 lots, all have areas less than the required 15,000 SF, and six have lot widths less than 90 feet. 3. The variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or it's surroundings.: The property will still consist of a two-story hip -roofed structure with massing similar to neighboring double dwelling units. Additionally, it will adhere to the guidelines stipulated in the Comprehensive Plan for Low Density Design, ch. 4, 4-42 to 4-46. • Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district 1. There are two properties in the area that are zoned R-1 but would be similarly non -conforming were they to be re -zoned R-2. These two properties are directly across the street from 3923 (Addresses 3922 and 3918). However, these two properties are fundamentally different than 3923: • Whereas 3923 is surrounded by one high density apartment building, two commercial properties, and one double dwelling unit, these two properties are adjacent Wther single- family lots and to a wetlands to the rear. oo • These lots are considerably smaller than 3923, calculated at �� p ately 2/3 the area. Given setback requirements, the buildable area of the lot be prohibi�"iy small for double dwelling use, resulting in individual units of widths that woI fgllfielow the required 18'. I\ �� QF �� G` 3 •••H•M•M••• design collaborative 3923 49`s STREET - DOUBLE DWELLING 612.655.3745 Rezoning Application 2429 Sheridan Ave. S *Edina, Minnesota Minneapolis, MN 55405 May 8, 2015 www.hmmarch.com • Because they are on the opposite side of the street, they could not claim they act as a transitional buffer from the commercial district. • Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. 1. The City of Edina, per its Comprehensive Plan, regards this type of use to be both reasonable and favorable. • Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood. 1. All setback and height requirements will be maintained. See 1.c. above. The basic site plan is similar to most other double dwellings on the street in that there is a single structure with a cohesive facade and a single drive accessing parking that is shielded from view. • • 4 k� • • • ST -1 SANDSTONE SILL AND TRIM, SMOOTH FINISH LOCATION: WWOOW TRIM BR -1 STANDARD BRICK. RUNNING BOND STUCCO SKIM COAT. SINGLE LAYER �S v REVISIONS PROJECTTEAM Isas.oe RE-zoMnG SURVEYOR VAN NESTS SURVEYNG TRAVISVANNESTE 8 5 WILOHURST ROAD EXCELSIOK MN 55331 LANDSCAPE ARCH: CIVIL ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: OWNER: PROJECT ADDRESS: LILY PAD LANDSCAPE OVIL SRE GROUP HMM DESIGN COLLABORATIW RAMERSEAN LLC >• 392349th STREET TM PANO'DT MATTPAVEK4931 3Rh ST., SUITE 24295HERIDAN AVE. III FDINA MN 554z4 MMNEEAPOUS, N 55406 ST. LW�S PARK N 554 6 MIN655 37455 MN 55405 Q = 12 Oi ®s\ WHITEWASHN: LOCATIOBASE, UCOLOR LCORNER VOLUMEUME VO 8-1 STUCCO WITH FINE SANG FINISH, BY MATERIALS WORLD OR APPROVED EQUAL; COLOR. HARVEST GOLD, LIGHT LOCATION: PROTRUDING VOLUME WD -1 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING; COLOR WHITEWASH LOCATION: RECESSED VOLUME NTAL CIIAR WD -2 COLOR: MISSION BROWN LOCATIONPENCE, LOCATION: FENCE, ENTRY, WINDOW ACCENTS R -i THREE -TAB ASPHALT SHINGLE; COLOR: SAND BROWN IOCATON:R00F SPA SUNMODULE SOLAR PANEL, SW 250 MONO OR APPROVED EO ~� LOCATION: ROOFF �S v REVISIONS PROJECTTEAM Isas.oe RE-zoMnG SURVEYOR VAN NESTS SURVEYNG TRAVISVANNESTE 8 5 WILOHURST ROAD EXCELSIOK MN 55331 LANDSCAPE ARCH: CIVIL ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: OWNER: PROJECT ADDRESS: LILY PAD LANDSCAPE OVIL SRE GROUP HMM DESIGN COLLABORATIW RAMERSEAN LLC >• 392349th STREET TM PANO'DT MATTPAVEK4931 3Rh ST., SUITE 24295HERIDAN AVE. III FDINA MN 554z4 MMNEEAPOUS, N 55406 ST. LW�S PARK N 554 6 MIN655 37455 MN 55405 Q = 12 Oi ®s\ � 0 0 � | L wm 0 � 0 m... � D 11 0 -V—V—V—V—V—V—." V_V—��•''•''y�.y—V�V i9 �TH STREETI\WEST L,• lu r' 'Iv • !.11'Pi .x }(�-.CP.1"C IIIV . _ s" wnrm: cur cr_ 3 '�.I N89 -2930"E 65.51 RAIN za,�=—?_-. c-�— xT.. Y �+y='n r„=-BMs=lam- —tc_� ��— GARDEN =i�% ) G n'9 T— ACCESSIBLE ” ` DRIVE TO ENTRY WALK ___--—BELOW GRADE – _ PARKING _FENCE I_�t'Th LAIC 11F THE .I.. I` o..:'1.7A. 1-99 I PRIPAR�D FOR: _G¢I$(F ^P7.•e-r wau_ u.^vu1n.T� ':''.I If t ATHIS. V.6'T[I;]GF. :1 UILAII A':=1,LC SOUTi- • rIEI,x3��F.'a FLn,.nIG aaEi I I I • Q) 1 SITE P:LAN . PROPOSED SURVEY KEYNOTES ADDITION SURVEYS OWNER: PROJECT ADDRESS: EXISTING SURVEYS IRATIVE BAKER BEAN LLC m 392349th STREET Q PROPOSED EDINA MN 55424 J 5 3 Lu 01 c�Lu • • CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 49iTH STREETI'\,WEST 0'. 10 r..t R o 10 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: yN89'28'30'E 65.St.�l Fl if. ,' � I =.r rrFr rF 1.0t s', A'PHOPS !a_Irrlsl:a, -- ` — •I':. I"_, I"E'L'IEfIv iWAA-TI, 1,1144ES01N L.1111 -- TI I .11Uiill :IC iAITI C'; . 1:75 rC7 THE,,C•._F S' riy CY pi• �-•- I}. pN. --r- C - [sl fM ]n Gr —7 • �� _—+ ry '_ =T7 Y r.; G.+--.. Ste• G —. G -,L _ _. — N XL —and_ '— /. tEf3EdD• 1 1 11 ,y� �� Il �♦ II, •i I�, - �. _ � rr,Y'¢„ac,,r.,nvlElrt _ \ 01 :> I' u I 01.' E1. ar x =r � � I ; ;j .Yi r? :.,Ir ?airr-E1 •1 Sa, a;o- I ':tF•'.. I I g '._,I.II't:',iVi14• F [;-iT"I. / I { oea}ct a= 'RIC L_IzE In I,c1-r l / I .M creR,,:A3 jn.,rr .G.. .ralEF!'�'1 I I II' r�IJTJFAL )•:.IRE l - l a I - / I I I - (. Ii ;6ER•a.nr.D :,1Ar,c IN'a'Ir:1 LHE Trltr I � I I •I '..\ ! i I ISI . ,;+11,1 I C, 1' ••,`` .. .. _�\ TOTES TI -S 1.L\'Er '!e» PE=T,)A.1CL Y+ITHCUT 11IC ttl I I•{' . ,'< �t '1 - Fnmr !.F F rITI.F. I'.sUPAW E C'4dldlilAdt" 11 I 1q,:+I'LP_ 5S "•F TI -E '� ,G'ECT aggz• =.Ti. j a / j 4Ti ' i _rZ :IrEST, 'IA, !1•LIC 'I 5°, iv Til .• `\ / I ! P;,i'.L.EL J.FEA 3,815 5J. Z III \ 1 Tilt `� /• I'y 1 I _ 41 gtAH Iv iASI- I- A.ELr:Ev • i �I'� � ,• t Q - UAIL I_Y tl•1'YA.':'. _-I,--!IJ FOG IP I_H,LFAW Ar ii* nr p a rE AY' FYD 4CTH ;TFEE` - {(I d 1�I. �ELf•.t�. ::E:T -_C'vA-•71I R7' d :0' 11. . 1,7: C.1 _?. ..k! r:1 l r� 1 •.�: iWRDCDVFR CALCUI ATIONS: 577 1,%4 C.P. EF 1 t j nl E T r r CERTIFICATION I.—I crrlit' L•.n _ - repv •L p• _ � 1rrl-' 0, I•J H'+ Of Ilk :I 1,1'11. .;.1, ezz `—N 88'49'39"------ — / -- " // I 9:.YID: ria N. Yc� Ilw:e. V.nnrale haleeaio.,,! :,u.,n yr HItr9 5Y 65.78 4 uAnl on F ofo imd sun- �r icesa PREPARED FCR: "rrrr ik 1 •.r r 1,6171Ir•.. �!r'F TE'1-•i:% Kir 5-IEF C,Ar1 ;:;:C'L;E r• t i! 11 IYr 3 REVISIONS N _5TE URv 1,41v PROJECT TEAM PROFESSIONAL SURY1'-NG SERVICES 15.05.08 RE -ZONING SURVEYOR LANDSCAPE ARCH: V S VAN NESTE SURVEYING LLY PAD LANDSCAPE CIVILSITEGROUP HMM DESIGI 1 SURVEY -EXISTING Atk TIM PANCHOT REVISIONS PROJECT TEAM 15.05.08 RE -ZONING SURVEYOR LANDSCAPE ARCH: CIVIL ENGINEER: ARCHITE VAN NESTE SURVEYING LLY PAD LANDSCAPE CIVILSITEGROUP HMM DESIGI TRAVIS VAN NESTE TIM PANCHOT MATT PAVEK 2429SHERID 8SWILDHURSTROAD 3217 EAST 37th ST. 4931 WEST 35th ST., SURE 200 MINNEAPOI, ' EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-655-374 6 DUCILE IP04 PPE 894.10 RN 887 00 _SERVICE 11 1111 4' 9' 'ATREOUS C AT PIPE 49 j1 H S TRE E it W EST :A89'28'30"E 65.51 (66 PLAT) INFILTRATION BASIN SEE DETAIL VOLUME BETWEEN ELEV. 895.5.696.5=150 CIF BOT=Bes. 5 OEIEOF= 896 ' OEIEOF TO NORTH 896.00 MI! 898.50 596.26 ME C89&00 TB 1 88&50 888.40 891 w Lp AN OR TR CH Ats 1. SEE SEE 2. THE SIL, C01 MAI ERC ENI 001 THE RE( HIS PR( E)U: AFI ALL P 117,14 *> 897.64—/ It �O ME L 0 T 3 2 Ll 897 , 64 41 1 - ',n 890.00898.00 I BS 6: 19 ME ga ME SEE DETAIL VOLUME BETWEEN ELEV. -iEeOLI89" 897-.0 = 48CF 80T-896.5 OFJEOF= 897.0 OEIEOFTO EAST 896.D0 TV! 891.50 SIFF 'ELECTR:C �ANSFORMER 1.50 BW 891.0 B9 2.kO I.OD 897.80 897.80 j 897.50 897.5 HEAVY S?:04 COVER IN THIS AF'EA AT TIME DF FIELDWORK eo- ------- ........ 894.40 ME ------------------------ ---- ----- ----------- 594 --- ------------- 0,97. I,iNE OF -HF SOUTHERLY 1.7.5 FEET OF -C'T 37 AS MONUME.110 Ats 1. SEE SEE 2. THE SIL, C01 MAI ERC ENI 001 THE RE( HIS PR( E)U: AFI ALL d' CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING I i a 1. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE OR BI( 2. DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTUF 6' D:Jt.I_E WIN PIPE -TEP! IA:N 3. CIEARANDGRUB. 4. CONSTRUCT NEW STRUCTURE 5. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY • S', I>a SITE ISSTABILIZEDAND BY SEEITHERSEED DI SO �, SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANYAREAS DISTIL _RIAI .894.10 _SERY!CE :11v = 886.1 NV aaz8D s (y i vds I \a EROSION PREVENTION XT 9' VITREOUS CL PIPE a THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PI 4R----- INLET PROTECTION AT \ IMPLEMENTNGAPPROPRIATE CONSTRUCT ``•-By,y%' NEAREST DOWNSTREAM VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL �P I CONSTRUCTION CA F BASIN(1) \a OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT ' 4 9 .ENTiANCE,Tll.\R\E E W E ST\a __89T__ ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABIL 51 (66 PLAT) -_�.°'' 1POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT INM �DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY eu_ SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY -1594:32`BOT'a.._o+-.__ _�94 s-F^.- G.y•s LV 1 STEP .p ~- _ `>' - - _ THE NORMALWETTED PERIMETER OF ANY 994.80 MEQ .BE 89 57 ME 894'30 MFp b. _r_ _ 8938 - > PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALET w a-y -.�I 9� -ME ANY PORTON OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE - o TH _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I� AROUND E SITE MUST BE STABILIZED VO - ----- __ '--L N M FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE 1NFILTRATEE DETAIK 'I _ �1.- - - e c?,_-59e-_p _axA`' INTO ANY SURFACE WATER.STABILIZATION .. g.. n . y. ° w FEET MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOUI VOLUME BETWEEN ELEY. -- 9 - !'9/ t'1 ``IY, 70A SURFACE WATER 8959-898.5=150 CF rt °b• ; p BOT=895.5 g p OEIEOF=898.5 ' ]90 a l 0�7 STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIO! OEIEOF TO NORTH 'yg5,5D s ! 89 . 4T5 OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES MUS �':. 896.0�gS DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACEV _-895' BOT I Bgt.S >>1 895.8 ME CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE[ ,B 7.1 897.90TW i OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. 891.0 896.00 ME B9i�0 R• 7•'7 ° 89 B9 S !! TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR I i t } USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYST °�'> �Ja• a tem > A i ' 7.DESIGNED ROCK DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLL' 5�' 890.0 I i NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. THESE AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING rn I .•} a, _ _,v - _ - ! rL,l- CONTAINMENT SYSTEM. eay.T2 m `897.90 /mss yg97.90 ae9.a I m i I PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TE III ,I & B9Z90 1588.51 l PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN: • 89 .00 4898.00 TW In I�997;61 M CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER 897. In 3 ? 'sa .�''� 888.50 BW BB8.5 ,BW >Pgs.l ME / 896:TiETA - .l` s: 888,40 898. i--= -_ T 17 SEDIMENT CONTROL /p lP TRENCH � e'( DRAIN "'e ° j itSEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MIN 896. M ENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING C ( i Sa 1 SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. SI- i mm BIO-RQ TYP. �- 3 SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE k ' DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE AM DISTURBINGACTIVITIESBEGIN. THESE PRA /j PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEE 4pI15'`s, ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTET BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL S' / I SILTFENCFl FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEE `997.84 897.64) BIO-ROLL, TYP. leap` 101, TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE i - 8 'ijO ME EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND GAN `5q.r ME., p I SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMIWAT ( AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR COND L UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR I, 897.64 897,64 L Q ( 3 2 VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM TH MUST BE MINIMIZED BY A ROCK CONSTRUC 999.28896IS ME SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF THE ROCK EN ,1 89600 898.00 f ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM STREET. 9 tt 9x) TEMPORARY DE-WATERING-OEWATERINS goI0 ME HID PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCITCH CUT: ISN T�AION BASIN RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY IIi I ' I VOLUME BETWEEN ELEV. OR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER N Bau89&5d 980=48CF A PROJECT ARYSITE OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTA S60'ME PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE IF THI BOT-89B.5 DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN gi'•'\ I'=•�� ' ( _ -'H OFJEOF=897.0 SURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WN I E 89&00k L 06EOF TO EAST BMP'S SUCH THATTHE DISCHARGE DOES N t t ' - - - y� • I' ELECTRIC THE RECEIVING WATER, DOWNSTREAM LAN L1� Q 898.00 iw 891.50 ew P AN5E0R!JER THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DIE 89680 ME `4� 891.50 B� . I _ W891.0 . 1592.50;' 1'00 ? I ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION - 1 I DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NA' SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER DISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIM 897.60 897.6a 897.80 g e r MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE �IsoyAlf, 857'5 III Z SUSPENDED SOLIDS. FILTER BACKWASH WATERS MUST BE HAUL - RETURNED TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TRF INCORPORATE INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER EROSION, DISCHARGE OF THE BACKWASH %�a"^ °' 4EA•^ 910':1 C04;.R li SEWER IS ALLOWED WITH PERMISSION OF' - (a/ ri TN15 ,.ILEA AT AUTHORITY %,: - I i ' 4' •' a y TME OF FIELDWORK 1. SOIL COMPACTION PRECAUTIONS o- �g6'6, 0gbh THE PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPA " INFEASIBLE, PRESERVETOPSOIL. MINIMIZB NOT RE DUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OFt g\I. -.. 897.40•M •" -' 897.00 ME - 89680 M 75-- THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTS ;'-69T-` 894 i .40 ME MINIMIZING COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE -- -- EQUIPMENT, AND STAYING OFF OF AREAS' F):NCFJ_ ---- _�94- --- y UN-COMPACTED. METHODS TO PRESERVE' l TYR 45!839 •W 64 ,g = ETCAVATI AND STOCI�ILING TOPSOIL PRI EXCAVATION OPERATIONS ._SOOT IC'l, 1-"+5 C' FEET 'V L•JI "' A, R'atIU'TF ITCH'. _ CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING lyl�s (c0 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE ANIOR OTHERAPPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. PLANT AND MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE. G RO 1 - y y 4931 W. 95TH ST. SUR ST. LOUIS PARR, MN GRASSPRE-TREATMENTSTRI N, y W WNQ, CrvilbileGrauP.nnn A WAT�jiPR00fI,EASi F$CE OF N. y —F—I, ]63-213-39aa GENERALNOTES i BUILDING FOUNDATIONIRETAINING WALL FOUNDATIOWRETAINING WALL 4. INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER,SISSEWER ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTIONDEVICE. Vr W W W ✓, . J. y y y J. y W J• i ♦ J• IANT MATERIAL: SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN ----------- RUNOFF ,y W W W V- W V• W J. J ,T, y J• W 5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROM CLOGGING. CONSTRUCTION. ` 2 GRADING OF SIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW -COMPACTION EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS. i W W W y Jr Y Jr W i W V- W W J gyp' i J• B. PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 3. ALL SI18 MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, Jr W W W i W W W W W •k W 5 W Jr W W 7. SEED AND MULCH ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. y W W Wr- W 'ALOPE B. CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA- REA9. J. O C DRUNOFF F OM OOF W W i i W W W i 9.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AMC PERMENATE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. CRO ECRON L J. N W W i y y y ✓r W W W J• i i BIO -RETENTION, INFILTRATION, FILTRATION (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.) W Jr i V- i W i i J W Jr y i W W W W W i W W W V' i W J• V• W i i y W Vr y Jr i W Jr J C4 1 NTS •� W W W W Jr W i W Jr i W W W W W y W W W •✓ W W W Jr i W W W W W Jr / .� l" tl � 4�/ N Z N � N �p z TYPICAL PLAN VIEW Lu LU W 3:Z RANT MATERIAL: SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN ® W SEE GRADING RAN FOR DEPTH UU W.W co O3 • W D BLDG FOUNDATION/ 3FI co RETAINING WALL ® >. 771 1— 11 � I—III—..: :v.•':•=k�a4a�:x- ROOFMELI9RANEAT FOUNDATIOPLRETAINING WALL FOUN GRASS PRE-TREATMENTSTRIP ' UNDISTURBED, UNLOMPACTED INSRU SOIL 0 BASE: SEE LAND IT-rT' I—()CTT-rI' a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT MIK PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 2t• SPECIFICATCN, OR REPT WRHAWELL BLENDED MIXTURE VOLUMBI: UNDEF PREPAREDIO 70% HOMOGENOUS SAND A O SUPERVISIONANDTINT I/ AF CO 3� ORGANIC LFAF COMPOST ORGANIC UCDER THE LAWS CIF UNDER THE UW5 DF THE TYPICAL SECTION VIEW MINNESOTA. Ma ew R Pavel DATE 4/17715 LICENSE N CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING ISSIJEkLdITTAL SU 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE ANIOR OTHERAPPROPRIATE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. PLANT AND MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE. oN SL ' - 2 ALL DOWN -GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS MUST BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT 11. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS N\NG,OEQ LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. ADEQUATELY VEGETATED. 3. PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. A GENERALNOTES i 4. INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER,SISSEWER ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTIONDEVICE. 1. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUING �q ----------- 5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROM CLOGGING. CONSTRUCTION. ` 2 GRADING OF SIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW -COMPACTION EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS. R A DN B. PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 3. ALL SI18 MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, 7. SEED AND MULCH ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. B. CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA- REA9. 9.IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AMC PERMENATE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES. I BIO -RETENTION, INFILTRATION, FILTRATION (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.) C4 1 NTS M • • Z FLOOR PLAN - LEVELI /L @) ADDITION LANDSCAPE ARCH: CIVILENGINEER: ARCHITECT: OWNER: PROJECTADDRESS: Z LILY PAD LANDSCAPE CIVILSTTE GROUP HMM DESIGN COLLABORATIVE BAKER BEAN LLC > 3923 49th STREET TIM PANCHOT MATT PAVEK 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. z EDINA MN 55424 J d 3217 EAST 37th 5T. 4931 WEST 35th ST., SUITE 200 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-655-3745 = W c[Q O� Y • r: • 1 FLOOR PLAN-LEVELO AZO V-1-0c, REVISIONS PROJECT TEAM 15.05.08 RE -ZONING SURVEYOR LANDSCAPE ARCH: CIVIL ENGINEER: ARCHITI VAN NESTE SURVEYING LILY PAD LANDSCAPE CML SITE GROUP HMM DESIG TRAVIS VAN NESTE TIM PANCHOT MATT PAVEK 24295HER1[ 85 WILDHURST ROAD 3217 EAST 37th ST. 4931 WEST 35th ST., SUITE 200 MINNEAPOL EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-655-37, LJ • 0 g);--n AN a1 I G�� ADDITION FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLO, ARCH: CIVIL ENGINEER: ARCHITECT: OWNER: PROJECT ADDRESS: WE CIVILSITEGROUP HMM DESIGN COLLABORATIVE BAKER BEAN LLC } 392349th STREET Z ROOF MATT PAVEK 2429SHERIDANAVEZ EDINA MN 55424 a 4931 WEST 35th ST., SUITE 20D MINNEAPOLISMN55405 } 55406 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-655-3745 _ c Y • • FLOORPLAN-LEVEL2 A )� ,v.n e�r REVISIONS PROJECT TEAM 15.05.08 RE -ZONING SURVEYOR LANDSCAPE ARCH: CIVIL ENGINEER: ARCHITE VAN NESTE SURVEYING LILY PAD LANDSCAPE CIVILSITEGROUP HMM DESIG TRAVS VAN NESTE TIMPANCHOT MATTPAVEK 2429SHERIC 85 MIEDHURST ROAD 3217 EAST 37th ST. 4931 WEST 35th ST., SUITE 200 MINNEAPOL EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55406 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-655-374 • - 49TH ST ifV sm 3?= 0 UNIQUE SITE tie 2 g no 17 (54) '64) 47 (1D7 ffi Lij Z ut.zz y 65) _• — ..zG 820V -._.. _ _ _..._—_... R-21 t R-1 R-1 e (66) - 49TH ST ifV sm 3?= 0 UNIQUE SITE tie 2 no 17 (54) (1D7 ffi Lij Z ut.zz y _• — ..zG 820V -._.. _ _ _..._—_... R-21 t R-1 R-1 e - 49TH ST ifV sm 3?= 0 UNIQUE SITE tie 2 11 mall - M • OO ovo 7- std X22 • 0 F Il to POP �f==1 • E t. 071 • cp, • 0 • 0 C� �m 0 • '001, • 0 I A • • • Parcel 18-028-24-14-0027 ID: Owner Baker Bean Llc Name: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property Residential Type: Home- Non -Homestead stead: Parcel 0.21 acres Area: 9,086 sq ft A -T -B: Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 6/3/2015 Market Total: (� Tax Total: Sale Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Sale representation or warranty expressed or Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Sale Code: COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 Think: -Green? 4 A http://gis.hennepin.us/Property/print/default. aspx?C=473 966.042545 08 513,4973 498.5 9245 6... 6/3/2015 • DATE: June 3, 2015 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: David Fisher — Building Official Chad Milner —City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 392349th Street West — Special Review of Variance Application The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department and assumes the attached documents were submitted for building permit review. A more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. 1. A separate permit may be required from Minnehaha Creek Watershed District: www.minnehahacreek.org/ Street and Curb Cut 2. If application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut, Follow standards in curb cut permit • application: http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City Offices/Public _Works/CurbCutAppli cation. pd • Sanitary and Water Utilities 3. Underground parking ramp and large graded walk out "egress well," are very atypical for this land use. Both excavations lack positive surface drainage. This situation creates undue risk to sanitary infiltration and inflow. These areas should include either positive grade away from the foundation or be connect to drainage system that drains away. Storm Water Utility 4. The subject site front yard drains to 49`h Street and is part of subwatershed MHN _71. Downstream public system stormwater capacity is limited. The downstream system also includes a runoff volume sensitive landlocked basin prone to flooding. 5. The subject site rear and side yard also drains to subwatershed MHN _58. This drainage path is through city property to the south and then to 49 '/2 Street West public system. 6. Required storm water and erosion control precautions are described below. Site Storm Water 7. A storm water management plan signed by a Professional Engineer is provided to meet the following condition. a. Mitigate volume increase to MHS -71. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 8. Grading and erosion control plan meets standards. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 7 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 5 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 25, 2014 7:00 PM • • 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call: Scherer,Schro er, Lee, Kilberg, Olsen,rr, Platteter, Forrest Members absent from roll: Halva III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Schroeder moved approval of th e Carr seconded the motion. All voted /aye;mn cjqChair Staunton informed the Commisa iter West 49th Street have been continuednning IV. 25, 2014 meeting agenda. Commissioner A. 6500 France Avenue and C. 3932/34 nission meeting of July 9, 2014. A. Minutes of the /Allvpopteod eeting of the Edina Plannin Commission June 11, 2014 Commissioner Lee mval of the June 11, 2014, meeting utes. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion aye; motion carried. 1'Al Jim and Lori Grotz, 5913 Park Place, addressed the Commission VI. PUBLIC HEARING B. Preliminary Rezoning and Variances. Mathias Mortenson. 3923 West 49th Street, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Appearing for the Applicant Mathias Mortenson Page 1 of 113 0 Discussion 0 Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to clarify the process. Planner Teague responded that the rezoning request is a two-step process; variance is one. Ar)Dlicant Presentation Mr. Mortenson addressed the Commission and explained since the meetings before both the Commission and Council he revised the plans to the greatest extent possible. Mortenson explained the subject site is unique; pointing out it is located next to a 4 -story apartment complex with parking lot, abuts commercial properties to the south and the block the subject site is located on contains mostly R-2 zoned properties (15); not R-1(4) as the subject site is currently zoned. Continuing, Mortenson also noted the subject site is narrow, and is "cradled by a Height Overlay District", reiterating the subject lot is one of the few in the City with such unusual conditions. Mr. Mortenson further reported that he has two goals which in his opinion align well with the City's housing goals as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Goal #I is accessibility and Goal #2 is sustainability. Mortenson expanded on those goals. In conclusion Mortensen thanked the Commission for their time reiterating in his opinion this project is a plus for the City. Discussion Commissioner Carr indicated that she has concerns about safety as it relates to the retaining wall. She stated that wall is very high and would be dangerous; especially for children if not adequately secured. Mr. Mortenson responded that his intent would be too screen the wall with a strip of landscaping. Carr stated she believes a fence is also warranted. Mortenson responded he would be receptive to installing a fence as well as landscaping. Commissioner Scherer stated she agrees with Commissioner Carr's comments on the retaining wall and suggested adding a wrought iron fence for safety, adding she believes it would blend well with the landscaping elements. Continuing, Scherer said she wasn't concerned with the lot coverage issue. She stated in her opinion this is a transitional neighborhood and the use of the lot provides buffer to the R- I zoned properties. Scherer asked for clarification on the lower level of the proposed double. Mr. Mortenson explained that the lower level space accommodates the needs of an aging population. He explained that the potential owner is not only interested in living in one of the units because the design lends itself well to "one level" living with multiple levels; it also meets a need not easily found in Edina. Mortenson said all necessities (kitchen, bath, laundry, etc.) would be provided on the ground level and an elevator would connect the below grade parking to the upper two floors. All features on the "main" level would meet ADA requirements with the basement level serving as quarters for in-home care. Commissioners expressed some concern over the internal makeup of the units because there is the potential for "multiple dwellings" because of the interior configuration. Mortenson said his intent and the intent of the owner is to rezone the property to R-2, double dwelling unit district. The intent is not to exceed that; it's not a request for a PRD. Mortenson further stressed the intent is two dwelling units period. Mortenson said the configuration relates well to one level living with the property owner able to have guests and a live-in care giver. Concluding, Mortenson said a neighbor in the area has expressed interest in one of the units. Page 2 of 11 v I 0 Public Hearing Chair Staunton opened the public hearing. Mary Quinlivan, 3922 West 49th Street addressed the Commission and explained that she really likes the aesthetics of the building; especially the front. Quinlivan said in her opinion the two recently constructed doubles are way out of scale for the neighborhood. She acknowledged they are beautiful buildings; however, they are too large with overly exposed garage doors. Concluding, Quinlivan reiterated her support. She likes the look of the building and is impressed with the property owners of sustainability goals. Chair Staunton acknowledged e-mails received on the project. Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the subject; being none, Commissioner Scherer moved to closed the public hearing. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. Discussion Commissioner Platteter stated he wasn't opposed to rezoning this site from R- I to R-2, adding to him it makes sense. Platteter said what he struggles with is the lot coverage. Platteter said he just thinks the building as proposed is too large. Commissioner Olsen agreed with the comment from Commissioner Platteter on lot coverage. She • further added that she believes the project is honorable, the sustainability element of the project is good; however, she believes it's too large. Commissioner Carr commented she isn't troubled by the lot coverage adding this lot is difficult to work with and she supports the rezoning; it makes sense. Commissioner Scherer reiterated she too is less concerned with lot coverage and is swayed by the unique location of this lot (parking lots on two sides of the lot). Continuing, Scherer said she likes the "look" of the home(s) from the front street; it blends well, especially without the introduction of large garage doors. Commissioner Lee stated she agrees the applicant has great design and sustainability ideas; however, is concerned with the mass of the proposed structure on a lot this size. Lee said she is concerned with drainage; suggesting that the applicant retain a civil engineer to review the drainage. She also said in her opinion the roof pitch is too high, adding there may be other solutions to pursue. Continuing, Lee said she appreciates the unique use of the home(s) and that it responds to the life cycle living as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Concluding, Lee stated she continues to believe if constructed as proposed there is too much "building" on this R- I lot. In response to Commission comments Mr. Mortenson said he would retain both a civil engineer and landscaping architect if the rezoning was approved. He said he worked very hard to keep the lot coverage at a minimum. With respect to building height a certain height is needed to provide the optimum angle for the solar panels. Commissioner Forrest said she has a concern that the height of the building to the east and the 40 potential for height to the south of the subject site may compromise the solar panels. Forrest also Page 3 of 11 A31 • stated in her opinion that the size of the proposed building is too much for this R- I lot. Concluding, Forrest stated rezoning the lot to R-2 isn't a problem; the size of the structure is. Chair Staunton asked Mortenson to clarify his reasoning for a two-story structure with basement. Mr. Mortenson explained the proposed layout of the doubles is to provide one level living space with flexibility; achieving life cycle housing. The "main" level provides complete one level living and the flexibility of have guests visit and/or stay and to provide an area for a live-in care provider. Mortenson also reported that square footage is important in providing this flexibility. Commissioner Carr stated this request in any other location would give her pause; however, this lot is unique, reiterating rezoning the lot to R-2 makes good sense. Commissioner Scherer agreed with Carr, adding square footage is important in providing the right balance in living space, adding potential owners do desire space. Commissioner Schroeder questioned why 25% is the magic number. He pointed out no one can really perceive the difference. Schroeder said this proposal could have runoff issues; however, if a Civil Engineer "signs off' on the project as presented he has no issue with the lot coverage variance. Commissioner Lee reiterated it the size of the structure on the lot that's an issue for her. Her concern regards drainage and changing an R- I Lot to an R-2 Lot would impact drainage patterns. Commissioner Staunton reiterated in his opinion the R-2 rezoning is appropriate. He said it appears Mr. • Mortenson has responded to the Commission and Council suggestions, adding if drainage issues are satisfied by a Civil Engineer he could support the request as submitted. Motion Commissioner Carr moved variance approval subject to submittal of a fence and landscaping plan that provides safety and minimizes the impact of the retaining wall. Approval is also subject to a civil engineer reviewing and approving a storm water and erosion control management plan and subject to permitting from the Watershed District. Carr further suggested that Mr. Mortenson ensure (in writing) that the lower level space of each unit is considered part of the structure and not an approved separate unit. Carr further moved that variance approval is contingent on final rezoning. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion: Planner Teague clarified that this request is a two-step process that would be heard again by both the Commission and Council for final approvals. Ayes Scherer, Schroeder, Carr and Staunton. Nay, Lee, Olson, Platteter and Forrest. Motion failed 4-4. Commissioner Carr moved to recommend preliminary rezoning approval contingent on approval of the variances. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Schroeder, Olson, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton. Nay, Lee. Motion to rezone approved 7-1. Page 4of11 43� • A discussion ensued on what would happen if the site was approval and the double wasn't built; would the single family home be nonconforming. Planner Teague explained it would be nonconforming; however, if rebuilt as a single family home it would have to be built exactly as is today. VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan — 7200 France Avenue Planner Teag informed the Commission a request to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop th .51 acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue has been made. Teague s 'd the applicant is re esting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existin ice building on the site, d redevelop it with a six and four-story mixed use dev pment project that would in de the following: ➢ 170 unit Itartment (6 stories) (20% affordable) ➢ 25 units o ow housing. (4 stories) ➢ 45,500 squa feet of retail space including two taurants. ➢ A two-level ulVerground parking ramp. Teague noted the retail space\areatthche located on the . ` ance side of the project. Access to the residential portidevelop men ould be from 72"d Street. • Access to the retail portion wff of Franc venue. The existing vegetation and trees on the wf the sit ould remain to provide screening from the residential we . To accommodate the request, three aments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height — fr 4 stor� ➢ Housing Density rom 30 unix ➢ Floor Ar/Rat�' from .5 to I A rezoning of all the pruld then be i Development. to 6 stories. , Der acre to 50. to PUD, Planned Unit Dean Dovolis DJR Architects and Laurie Boisclair, Boisclair Cd%poration. Discussion Commissioner Lee asked what the zoning of the subject site is and if the existing building was non -conforming. Planner Teague responded the subject site is zoned POD, Planned Office District and the building is non -conforming. Teague said the site is proposed to incorporate • elements of the mixed use zoning district. Page 5 of 11 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIO AN RESENTATIONS V.A. BRAEMAR GOLF C! SE UPDA —RECEIVED Joe Abood, Braemar KeseeCogireat urse General ager, introduced himself, described his professional background, and stat potential with Braemar Golf Course. The Council welcomed Mr. Abood. V.B. SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED — T C: CONSERVATION INCENTIVES Co ications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary o pions, both pros and cons, collected t ugh Speak Up, Edina relating to conservation incentives. V1. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and or0ftd placed on file. VI.A. PRELIMINARY REZONING, LOT AREA AND WIDTH VARIANCES, BUILDING COVERAGE VARIANCE AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE, 3923 49TH STREET, MATHIAS MORTENSON — RESOLUTION NO. 2014-79 ADOPTED TO DENY Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Mathias Mortenson regarding 3923 49th Street, for preliminary rezoning from R -I Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District; a lot area variance from 15,000 sq. ft. to 8,816 sq. ft.; lot width variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; building coverage variance from 25% to 32%; and, side yard setback variance from 15 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. Mr. Mortenson was proposing to tear down a single-family house and construct a new double dwelling unit. Mr. Teague reviewed the Council's past sketch plan consideration and the proponent's attempt to address some of the expressed concerns. It was noted the Planning Commission ishad recommended approval of the requested rezoning contingent upon approval of the variances. The motion of the Planning Commission related to the requested variances failed on a 4-4 vote. Staff recommended denial based on the rationale that the combination of variances was too much for this particular site; the building would exceed lot coverage; and, a reasonable use existed. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to the impact of approving the requested rezoning and denying the requested variances, and lot dimensions within this block. The Council acknowledged written public comment received. Proponent Presentation Mathias Mortenson, architect representing the proponent, 2429 Sheridan Avenue, Minneapolis, described design revisions that he believed created an improved project, better fit the neighborhood, and uniqueness of this site. He stated the proposed design accommodated age -in-place housing and asked the Council to approve the request, as revised. The Council asked questions of Engineer Millner relating to site drainage and stormwater storage capacity and of Attorney Knutson relating to variance conditions to restrict the use to a duplex. Mr. Mortenson defined the revised ridge height and stated a preliminary grading and drainage plan had been developed by his civil engineer and submitted to the Council committing to handling 90% of all drainage and runoff on site. Mr. Mortenson stated the hard surface exterior spaces could be constructed of permeable pavers but the proposed rain gardens would meet the sustainability goal. He indicated the solar panels on a south - facing gable would accommodate electrical needs to reduce consumption of resources. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. isPublic Testimony Nancy Thorvilson, 7221 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Jon Andresen, 4804 Maple Road, addressed the Council. Page 2 4 l � Minutes/Edina City Council/July I S, 2014 0 Ben Hackel, 7105 Glouchester Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Teague addressed issues raised during public testimony on types of variances that had been considered in this area. Mr. Mortenson indicated his building footprint included all uses on the block but even when considering only the residential -type uses; his proposal remained in line with the average structure. The Council discussed the proposal and asked questions of Mr. Mortenson and Mr. Teague relating to use of the lower level and site drainage. Support was expressed for the improved design, sustainability aspects, and redevelopment of a site bordered on either side by a parking lot. Council Discussion & Action Council concern was expressed related to the requested lot coverage variance, lack of hardship required for variance consideration, storm water drainage, ineffective location of two rain gardens at the rear of the property, and potential risk of sanitary infiltration and inflow due to proposed excavations that lacked positive surface drainage. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014-79, Denying Preliminary Rezoning from R-1 to R-2; Lot Area and Width Variances; Building Coverage Variances; and, Side Yard Setback Variances, based on the following findings: 2.01 The variance criteria are not met. 2.02 The current zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • 2.03 The multiple variances requested demonstrate the property is not suitable for R-2 zoning. 2.04 There are no practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The property owner does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the Zoning Ordinance. It is not reasonable to deviate from the ordinance requirements when there is nothing unique about the property that justifies the variances. The need for variances is caused by the applicant's desire to build such a large two-family dwelling on the site. 2.05 Reasonable use of the property exists with the two-story single family currently located on the property. 2.06 The size of the proposed structure creates the need for the lot coverage variance, and the side yard setback variance. 2.07 The City has traditionally not granted variances for building lot coverage when tearing down a home (single-family home or duplex) and building a new one. 2.08 Proposed building coverage would be nearly triple the building coverage that exists today with the single family home. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Brindle Motion carried. _ VII. COMMUNITY No one appeared to cot Vlll. REPORTS / RECO E TIONS VIII.D. SKETCH PLAN — 7 0 FRA E AVENUE —REVIEWED • Mayor Hovland explained purpose o sketch plan review, which did not include a public hearing, noting the application process that followed included four opportunities for public testimony. Page 3 t FOUNDATIONS SECTION R401 GENERAL R40LP Application• The provisions of this chapter shall :t trol the design and for all buildings nof the Wo d foundatio snshall foundation spaces ,be designed and installed in accordance with AF&PA PWF. Exception: The provisions of this chapter shall be permit- ted to: be used for wood foundations only in the following sltuauuiib. ; L In buildings that have no more than two floors and a roof. basement and foundation walls are 2. When interior constructed at intervals not exceeding 50 feet (15 240 arm). Wood foundations in Seismic Design Category Do, DIor D, shall be designed in accordance with accepted engineering practice. R401,2 Requirements. Foundation construction shall be capa- ble of accommodating all loads according to Section R301 and of transmitting the resulting loads to the supporting soil. Fill saas,that support footings and foundations shall be designed, installed and tested in accordance with accepted engineering practice. Gravel fill used as footings for wood and precast con- crete foundations shall comply with Section R403. R40 -L3 Drainage. Surface drainage shall be diverted to a storm sewer conveyance or other approved point of collee- tion that does not create a hazard. Lots shall be graded to (train surface water away from foundation walls. The grade snarl fall aminimum of 6 inches (152 mm) within the first 10 i Exception: Where lot lines, walls, slopes or other physical barriers prohibit 6 inches (152 mm) of fall within 10 feet i (,3048mm)fdrains or srvales shall be constructed to ensure r drainage , awayfrom the structure. Impervious surfaces within 10 feet (3048 mm) of the building foundation shall -he sloped a minimum of 2 percent away from the building 1t4b1,4 Soil tests. Where quantifiable data created by pled soil science methodologies indicate expansive, eom- 1slbie,' shifting' or other questionable soil characteristics a c _J I to be present, the building official shall determine = tvltethcr to require a soil test to determine the soil's character - ,at a particular location. This test shall be done by an Prri agency using an approved method. 21=tli.41 Geotechnical evaluation. In lieu of a complete yehnical- evaluation, the load-bearing values in Table ,.I shall be as, �4I Courpressible or shifting soil. Instead of a com- ntechnical evaluation, when top or subsoils are com- b1e dr shifting they shall be removed to a depth and rent to assure stable moisture content in each �'andShall not be used as fill or stabilized within nve zone b y chemical, dewatering or presaturation. TABLE R401.4.1 PRESUMPTIVE LOAD-BEARING Val IIFS OF FOUNDATION MATERIALS' For SI: 1 pound per square toot = U.U4IV Kra. a. When soil tests are required by Section R401.4, the allowable bearing capacities of the soil shall be part of the recommendations. b. Where the building official determines that in-place soils with an allowable bearing capacity of less than 1,500 psf are likely to be present at the site, the allowable bearing capacity shall be determined by a soils investigation. SECTION R402 MATERIALS R402.1 Wood foundations. Wood foundation systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with the provisions of this code. R402.1.1 Fasteners. Fasteners used below grade to attach plywood to the exterior side of exterior basement or crawl - space wall studs, or fasteners used in knee wall construc- tion, shall be of Type 304 or 316 stainless steel. Fasteners used above grade to attach plywood and all lumber -to - lumber fasteners except those used in knee wall construc- tion shall be of Type 304 or 316 stainless steel, silicon bronze, copper, hot -dipped galvanized (zinc coated) steel nails, or hot -tumbled galvanized (zinc coated) steel nails. Electro -galvanized steel nails and galvanized (zinc coated) steel staples shall not be permitted. R402.1.2 Wood treatment. All lumber and plywood shall be pressure -preservative treated and dried after treatment in accordance with AWPA U1 (Commodity Specification A, Use Category 4B and Section 5.2), and shall bear the label of an accredited agency. Where lumber and/or ply- wood is cut or drilled after treatment, the treated surface shall be field treated with copper naphthenate, the concen- tration of which shall contain a minimum of 2 percent cop- per metal, by repeated brushing, dipping or soaking until the wood absorbs no more preservative. R402.2 Concrete. Concrete shall have a minimum specified compressive strength off',, as shown in Table R402.2. Con- crete subject to moderate or severe weathering as indicated in Table R301.2(1) shall be air entrained as specified in Table R402.2. The maximum weight of fly ash, other pozzolans, silica fume, slag or blended cements that is included in con - OTA RESIDENTIAL CODE 1 121 The Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry has announced the following adoptions: • Chapter 1309 2012 International Residential Code with Minnesota amendments and Chapter 1300 Administrative Provisions will become effective January 24, 2015. This includes MN Rules 1309.0313 Fire Sprinkler Systems. While the state will be adopting the 2012 International Residential Code, it will be called the 2015 Minnesota Residential Code. Copies of the 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) with the Minnesota amendments and including the radon and energy codes can be obtained from ICC at http://shop.iccsafe.org/codes/state-and-local- codes/minnesota.html?code cycle=916. Copies of the Minnesota amendments can be found on the Department of Labor and Industry website at http://www.dIi.mn.gov/CCLD/Codes.asp Minnesota Rules state that applications received on or after the effective date of adoption must comply with the new code. So all applications received prior to the effective date will be processed in accordance with the 2007 Minnesota Residential Code. Those received on or after that date will be processed in accordance with the 2015 Minnesota Residential Code. MN Rules 1309.0313 Fire Sprinkler Systems - This amendment will require fire sprinklers complying with P2904 or NFPA 13D for attached dwellings meeting the definition of "townhouse", all two family dwellings, and all single family dwellings exceeding 4500 square feet in area. There are a number of issues to consider here. If you have a dwelling with a "mother-in-law" or similar apartment, the building might need a sprinkler system regardless of area. It becomes an interpretation issue regarding whether a second dwelling unit exists. This applies retroactively when a second dwelling unit is installed in an existing dwelling. If you are building row type dwellings that do not meet the definition of "townhouse", you should contact the Building Department for assistance early in the planning phase so you do not 40 experience any surprises. The 4500 square foot area trigger includes all floors and basements excluding garages. By definition this would include sunrooms and similar enclosed areas. The area does not include an open porch that only has a common wall with the dwelling. Any other floor area enclosed in any way contributes to the 4500 square foot area limit. Because additions can be made to existing homes that don't have sprinkler systems, you may wish to consider the timing of construction of sunrooms or other portions of the dwelling if that fits your plans or if the area of those structures places you above the limit. Again, the term "existing building", while blatantly clear, is subject to interpretation. Regarding the design of sprinkler systems, you will be guided by P2904 (if available) or NFPA 13D. DLI has put in place requirements exceeding those standards by amendment. They include requirements for at least one sprinkler head in attached garages and one head for every 20 lineal feet of common wall where attached covered patios, covered decks, and covered porches occur unless the area is 40 square feet or less. No definitions are provided for the terms "attached covered patios", "covered decks", and "covered porches". There is likely to be a lack of uniformity in the application of this section. It is important to point out that P2904 and NFPA 13D do not require any exterior heads or heads in garages. Those documents were not amended by DLI. Obviously a conflict occurs. The rules of interpretation found in Chapter 1300 do not provide clear guidance other than to further confuse the matter. You will certainly see conflicting opinions on this requirement. Detailed plans for residential sprinklers must be submitted for review and additional inspections will be required at various stages of construction. Service sizes must accommodate sprinkler systems. Because water conditioning systems may restrict flows to sprinkler systems, you would be doing your customers a favor by including the possibility of a water softener in your design calculations. Additional permits and fees may be applicable. h44 Jackie Hoogenakker From: David Cartwright <dcartwright@crplab.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 2:22 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 2015.006 3923 49th st To Edina Planning Commission, I am opposed to the request for the tearing down of a single family dwelling and replacing it with a duplex. There is already too much construction, traffic, congestion in our neighborhood, why make it worse. How about honoring the zoning ordinances that are in place without creating special exceptions for more development. The charm of the White Oaks neighborhood is rapidly dissipating, 49th st is a morass of construction, an eye sore and foul. Respectfully submitted, David Cartwright r 'I LJ To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: July 7, 2015 Subject: Affordable Housing Policy Action Requested: 'o)- A, o e o o S9. CO less isss Agenda Item #: VIII.A. Adopt the attached Policy as recommended by the Edina Housing Foundation. Action Discussion Information ❑ Information/Background: As a result of the Council Work Session with the Edina Housing Foundation on June 2, 2015, attached is the "City of Edina Policy on Affordable Housing for New Multi -Family Developments." The Housing Foundation is recommending some minor edits to the Policy that was discussed at the Work Session; those edits are highlighted in the policy. They are recommending that the 20% provision apply to projects that are over 20 units, as they recognize the difficulty in providing affordable housing in small projects. Additionally, they propose consideration of higher density or a density bonus for projects that include at least 20% of the units for affordable housing. Councilmember Brindle has provided a list of affordable housing issues that have been incorporated on page 3. ATTACHMENTS: • City of Edina Policy on Affordable Housing for New Multi -Family Developments City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • City of Edina Policy on Affordable Housing for New Multi -Family Developments BACKGROUND The City of Edina and the Metropolitan Council have worked together and established an affordable housing goal of creating 212 new affordable housing units in Edina by the year 2020. Since 2008, the City Council has approved 168 affordable housing units in the community. 2. The Edina Housing Foundation was established to assist the City to fund housing for low to moderate income families and elderly persons. 3. The Edina Housing Foundation has worked to accomplish these goals in affordable housing. In addition to maintaining existing affordable housing in Edina, since 1986 the Edina Housing Foundation has assisted in providing 366 new affordable housing units in the City of Edina. 4. The City Council requested that the Edina Housing Foundation recommend an affordable housing policy for the City. • POLICY The City Council will require that at least 20% of the total units in new multi -family housing developments over 20 units requiring rezoning or variance(s) be sold or rented at an affordable price as defined below: 2. The City will consider Tax Increment Financing for projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing. 3. The City will consider fee o and/ef- m^aifleat ens to SAC/WAG and/or- p dedie ,tie higher density or a density bonus for projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing. 4. The Edina Housing Foundation will consider providing financial assistance to new housing projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing. 5. Affordable rental housing shall remain affordable for a minimum of 15 years; this requirement shall be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. 0 • is 0 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEFINITIONS: Rental Housing: Either 20% of units are both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose income is 50% or less of the area median gross income, Or 40% or more of units are both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose income is 60% or less of the area median gross income. Both incomes (adjusted for family size) and rental rates (adjusted for bedroom count and including the cost of utilities) are updated annually and published in the Minnesota Housing website at www.mnhousing_gov. 2014 Income and rental limits are as follows: Gross Incomes Gross Rents 60% 50% 60% 50% 1 Person $34,860 $29,050 1 Bedroom $933 $778 2 Persons $39,840 $33,200 2 Bedrooms $1,120 $933 3 Persons $44,820 $37,350 3 Bedrooms $1,293 $1,078 4 Persons $49,740 $41,450 4 Bedrooms $1,443 $1,202 5 Persons $53,760 $44,800 6 Persons $57,720 $48,100 Ownership Housing: 20% or more of units are affordable to and initially sold to persons whose income is at or below the levels set in the Minnesota Housing "Startup Program" (first time homebuyer). This program has a sales price limit of $310,000. The Edina Housing Foundation has set this limit at $350,000 in consideration of the high prices in Edina. The Foundation would recommend that $350,000 be used as the acquisition limit in this definition. The 2015 income limits as published on the Minnesota Housing website are as follows: 1-2 person household 3 + person household $86,600 $99,500 Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually. • AFFORDABLE HOUSING ISSUES High land values in Edina make it difficult to provide affordable housing. 2. Few developers are willing to provide 20% affordable housing in their projects, without assistance from the City. 3. Developers are producing new housing at market rates. Current experience shows that new studio and one -bedroom apartments are going for $2,500 per month and higher. 4. The City of Edina needs a sustainable funding source for affordable housing. 5. When affordable units are available in high density housing, transit options for all modes will need to be upgraded, another use for TIF funding. 6. The City of Edina would benefit from a more diverse housing stock, by ensuring options are available to our workforce population. • 0 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL k- +` • I�C'01'iPORf'�wO • 1888 Agenda Item #: VIII. B. From: Debra Mangen Action X❑ City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: July 7, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2015-10 Amending time of sale of wine or intoxicating liquor on Sunday to Certain Licensees Action Requested: Adopt Ordinance No. 2015-10 including waiver of second reading allowing the sale of liquor in establishments holding Wine On -Sale Licenses, Club and Sunday Sale Licenses or On -Sale and Sunday Sale Licenses. Information / Background: During the 2015 session, the legislature changed the start time for selling wine and intoxicating liquor on Sunday moving it from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. To bring Edina's Code into agreement with state statue the attached amendment is necessary. It will allow holders of Wine On -Sale Licenses, Club and Sunday Sale Licenses or On -Sale and Sunday Sale Licenses to begin serving in their establishments beginning at 8:00 a.m. instead of 10:00 a.m. on Sunday mornings. Attachments: Ordinance No. 2015-10 • City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-10 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING LIQUOR THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 4-65 of the Edina City Code is hereby amended to provide as follows: Sec. 4-65. - Hours of sale. The hours and days of sale shall be as set forth in Minn. Stats. § 340A.504, except, however: (1) Establishments holding a wine license under this chapter or establishments holding both an on -sale club liquor license and a Sunday on -sale license under this chapter may sell intoxicating liquor or wine in conjunction with the sale of food between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight on Sundays, provided that the licensee is in conformance with the Minnesota Clean Air Act; and (2) Establishments holding both an on -sale intoxicating liquor license and a Sunday on -sale license may sell intoxicating liquor and wine in conjunction with the sale of food between the hours of 8:00 a.m. on Sundays and 1:00 a.m. on Mondays Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: July 7, 2015 i Second Reading: Waived Published: July 16, 2015 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: July 7, 2015 Subject: Resolution No. 2015-69 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: VJ • ,�C� idASO s • L Item M VIII. C. Action 0 Discussion ❑ Information ❑ In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2015-69 • City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-69 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Kitty O'Dea Carole Senty Sara Lenz Elabeth Goff Cindy Mayeron Teresa Luterbach Edina Parks & Recreation: Edina Give And Go $378.00 Edina Public Works: Minnesota Hemerocallis (Daylilies) Society Dated: July 7, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Office Supplies Miscellaneous Art Supplies Pottery Supplies Pottery Books Painting Supplies Drafting Supplies Scholarship Funding For Playground Programs 1 12 Clumps Of Daylilies Planted By City Hall James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 7, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk • C7 • To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: July 7, 2015 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. w91��1� o e cn Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Heather Branigin isFrom: Phil Mero <phil.mero@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 7:40 PM To: James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Kevin Staunton; bob.stewart@theplatinumgrp.com; Monica Mero; Ross Bintner; Chad Millner, Cindy Larson Attachments: finished productjpg; car catcherjpg; Masons MN Statutes 1927.pdf; cliff jpg Hello All - Hoping to get just a little more of your time, greatly appreciated. Needless to say I've been working on this tirelessly and have no plans on caving until the new neighbors and/or builder do the right thing. I am currently out of town otherwise I would be presenting this at your meeting this evening. Firstly, I would like to request that you seriously consider retroactively adding a section to the city code that states: Any construction that creates a potentially dangerous situation or nuisance for another neighbor must be reviewed by agents for the city and corrected. That even if the nuisance conforms to city code the city can still make the homeowner take steps to alter a potentially dangerous situation in which there is a chance of physical harm to others or to adjoining property. • Also, an attorney friend of mine came across a case from 1942 Sime VS. Lisbeth Jensen. The case is outlined in the link below. He believes that this could be applied in our case,and that demanding of the builder to install some sort of barrier certainly seems within reason. It's apparent why they will not raise their retaining wall. It is due to the poor design of garage/driveway and the fact that they would continuously run their bumpers into the wall when navigating from driveway to garage. As an innocent bystander, we should not have to suffer the consequences of their faulty design. I have attached a photo of a'car catcher' that you installed in your lot on 49.5 and France. A modified, 'residential' rendering of such a catcher could be applied to the lateral support next door. I would like the opportunity to discuss this with the city and the builder. http://inn.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer aMx/xq/fac 19421224 0002.MN.htm/qx An owner who by filling raises his land above the level of adjoining land has no right of lateral support from the latter and is under the duty to keep soil used in so raising his land off adjoining land. Berry v. Fleming, 87 App. Div. 53, 83 N. YS. 1066; American S. & T. Co. v. Lyon, 21 App, D. C. 122. The owner who by filling raises the level of his land above that of his neighbor's is bound to build a retaining wall or other structure if necessary to keep such soil within his own line. Please let me know how we need to proceed. • Many thanks! Phil Mero 612.963.0852 194.1 Supplement E To Jason's Minnesota Statutes, 1927 y` and ,4 Mason's 1940 Supplement Containing the text of the acts of the 1941 and 1943 Sessions of the Legislature, both new and amendatory, and notes showing repeals, together with annotations from the various courts, state and federal, and the opinions of the Attorney General, construing the constitution, statutes, charters and court • rules of Minnesota together with Law Review Articles and digest of all common law decisions. O❑ Edited by the Publisher's Editorial Staff MINNESOTA STATE LAW LIBRARY MASON PUBLISHING CO. SAINT PAUL L MINNESOTA 1944 X0OW ' • MAH LIBRARY N r: • is CH. 59—ESTATES IN REAL PROPERTY 8085. Qualities of expectant estates. Notwithstanding provisions of ¢§8043, 8066, 8091 and 8092, intent of a testator trustor prevails. Murray's Will, 207M7, 290NW312. See Dun. Dig, 10257. 8073. Several and joint estates, etc. Joint tenants by their mutual agreement may sever their joint tenancies and create a tenancy In common. Greiger v. Pye, 210M71, 297NW173. See Dun. Dig. 4960. 'Where Intention of the parties is to create an estate by survivorship at all events, a joint tenancy does not effectuate that intention. Id. See -Dun. Dig. 4961. A joint tenant may, at his pleasure dispose of his share and convey it to a stranger, resulting in a sever- ance or termination of joint tenancy, Id. See Dun. Dig. 4952, 8074: Estates in common, Where plaintiff purchased land, paying consideration therefor, and had title taken In name of himself and defendant, malting them tenants in common, title vested in defendant as to an undivided Interest, rights of cred- itors not being involved, subject to any claims they may have against each other as tenants In common, Drees V. G., 208M399, 294NW374. See Dun. Dig. 9895, To constitute a joint tenancy, four unities are required. unity of interest, title, time, and possession, and if any of these elements is lacking estate is not one In joint tenancy. Greiger v. Pye, 210A171, 297NW173. See Dun. Dig. 4950. In case of a joint tenancy with rlght of survivorship, one tenant could create -a severance by conveying all of his interest directly to the other joint tenant, since If this were not so there would be a time during which complete alienation could not take place, thereby result- ing in violation of statute against suspension of power of alienation. Id. See Dun. Dig. 4952. Where cotenant demanding interest has been in posses- slon of land asserting title in himself and receiving rents and profits, and a tender by his cotenants of amount due him for expenditures made' by him on account of common Property would be futile, he is entitled to interest on expenditures only from entry of judgment, Larkin v. McCabe, 211M11, 299NW649. See Dun. Dig, 9604. In case of cotenancy a tenant malting payments in pro- tecting estate is entitled to interest only from time he demands contribution. Id. Absent an agreement for compensation, a cotenant is not entitled to compensation for services rendered in managing, operating, or taking care of common property. Id. Uniform Interparty Agreement Act has no application In determination of whether husband's deed towife created an estate by the entiretles. Walker's Estate, 16 Ad (2d) (Pa)28. 8075. Nominal conditions disregarded. (a). Whhere land was conveyed to a town wherein grantee "agreed that the above described property shall be im- troved and kept improved, and that said grounds shall e used for a public park and picnic grounds only and for no other purpose whatsoever," property went to coun- ty upon dissolution of town by operation of law, includ- ing.appurtenant rights, privileges and duties, and wheth- er county could use property for uses other than as a .public park or picnic grounds would depend upon wheth- er there was a'condition subsequent or language was in- tended to be merely directory. a question of fact to be determined from all circumstances. Op. Atty, Gen. (44113), Jan, 4, 1941. A conveyance to a town "this town to maintain car tracks and wall gate, said land to revert to the party of the first part when ceased to be used by said town," con- stituted a condition subsequent upon breach of which, coupled with re-entry, estate of town will- be defeated, unless condition has become merely nominal, but such §8080-1 condition is directed toward a particular public use and not against succession of property to county upon disso- lution of town, and there is no reverter resulting from failure to use the property unless there Is a re-entry or an equivalent act before performance of condition as resumed. Id. 8078. Aliens, etc., not to acquire land. . Mere purchase of 160 acres of land at present'time 1s: not sufficient to bring alien within class of, an' "actual settler", but an alien who Is actually occupying upp to 160 of land at the present time with Intention of continu- ing possession for exclusive occupancy and use as his residence comes.within exception. Op. Atty, Gen, (3G), Feb. 15, 1940. COMMON LAW DECISIONS RELATING TO ADJOINING LAND OWNERS 1. In general. Adjoining owner Is entitled to a mandatory Injunction to compel the removal of a retaining wall encroaching on his land. Sime v. Jensen, 213M476, 7NW(2d)326, See Dun. Dig. 96a. Owner wbo by filling raises level of his land above that of his neighbor's is bond to build a retaining wall or other structure If necessary to keep such soil within his own line. Id. See Dun. Dig. 96e, An adjoining owner who raised his land above that of his neighbor and built a terrace halt on land of neighbor. and when , neighbor .removed half of terrace had his servants enter upon such land to cut sod In process of making a new grade for the terrace he was guilty of both nuisance and trespass. Id. See faun. Dig. 96d. There are cases to effect that when pursuant to a ver- bal contract owners of adjoining land co-operate in con- struction of a ditch or drain equitable doctrine of estop- pel will prevent one of them from Interfering with It to detriment of other. Herrmann v. Larson, 214M46, 7NW (2d)330. See Dun. Dig, 96a, 2823, 3209, 10157a. 2. Lateral support. An excavating land owner cannot recover from the owner of adjoining burdened land sums expended by the former to brace and shore the latter's property when the, expenditures were made voluntarily even though excava- tion could not be safely carried on without such pre- cautions and the owner of the burdened land refused to provide necessary protection. Braun v. H„ 206M672, 289 NW553, 129ALR618. See Dun, Dig, 96. Where a landowner by filling raises his land above ad- joiningland, he is not entitled to lateral support for the raised land from adjoining land, but, on the con- trary, he is bound to keep soil used for filling from fall- ing on adjoining land, and where he erects a retaining wall for that purpose he must erect it entirely upon his Own land, and ad,"Ining landowner cannot be compelled to pay any part of the cost thereof. Sime v. Jensen, 218H 476, 7NW(2d)326. See Dun. Dig, 96. Supported land has a right of lateral support from that which naturally affords its support, and supporting land is burdened with affording such support to land which it naturally supports. Id, Right of lateral support does not include support needed because of artificial alterations in supported land. Id, Right of lateral support froin adjoining land consists in having soil In its natural condition remain In its natural poe�tlon -without being caused to fall away by I of excavations or Improvements made on adjacent land. Id. Right of excavating landowner to recover exppense of shoring up adjacent building. 24MinnLawRev862. Removal of lateral support—substltution of artificial support by predecessor in title—duty of successor In title. 27MinnLawRev201. CHAPTER 59A Property.of Absentees 8080-1. Possession, management and disposition of certain property, Dispositions of stolen property and In hands of sheriff when he is.unable to find the owner,' Op. Atty. Gen. (605b-40), May 20, 1943. 763 lw e— ! �� f � �,r,,,,„,s.•+ .� � _- _ ..._- 2...��—�� ,,...—...�.��) � � ... T may,,,,.. n �. ` t` I r: 0 Heather Branigin From: D'Amelio, Krista <KDamelio@airlines.org> on behalf of Burgeson, Christine <CBurgeson@airlines.org> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:57 PM To: mayor@cityofsacramento.org Cc: Williams, Sean Subject: USCM Airport Resolutions Dear Mayor Johnson, Airlines for America (A4A), the oldest and largest industry trade organization for the leading U.S. airlines, offers the below comments on two proposed resolutions before you at the US Conference of Mayors 83d Annual Meeting. Oppose Resolution No. 101 that calls for a historic tax increase on airline passengers. Resolution No. 101 – Modernization of Airports - calls on the USCM to support a nearly 90 percent tax increase in the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) airport tax. Airlines have a demonstrated track record of supporting infrastructure improvements at our partner airports, but unlike the funding challenges faced by our highways, airports have an abundant variety of resources from which they can draw upon to finance infrastructure improvements. Resolution No. 102 regarding aircraft noise issues. With a strong track record of deploying new, quieter technology and the implementation of noise abatement operational procedures, the U.S. airlines have played an important role in reducing noise exposure. The number of people exposed to significant levels of aircraft noise in the U.S. has dropped by 95 percent since the late 1970s, even as enplanements have tripled. Due to slowly improving finances, U.S. airlines are acquiring a significant number of new, more fuel-efficient and quieter aircraft, which will help reduce noise levels even further. The top -ten U.S. passenger airlines have 367 aircraft scheduled for delivery in 2015. Additionally, NextGen improvements will enable the FAA to guide and track aircraft more precisely on more direct routes, as well as enable pilots to set aircraft engines near idle throttle while they descend, enabling a reduction in fuel consumption, emissions, and noise during the descent phase of flight. The resulting efficiencies of NextGen will enhance safety, reduce delays, save fuel, reduce aircraft exhaust emissions and limit the numbers of people impacted by aircraft noise. Legislative mandates to reverse Performance Based Navigation (PBN) procedures or adopt airport -specific operating restrictions would be shortsighted and counterproductive, because they would seriously undermine the wide -range of environmental benefits associated with NextGen and the stability and connectivity of the National Airspace System (NAS). The FAA is currently conducting a comprehensive, multi-year noise research project, commonly known as the "noise research roadmap," that is, among other things, reviewing the federal regulatory approach to noise measurement and actionable thresholds. This scientific and data -driven process should be allowed to proceed to ensure that any potential changes to U.S. noise metrics and policy receive proper consideration. A4A encourages the USCM to let the existing FAA noise research project move forward, unimpeded, in order to provide policy makers with the scientific and data -driven information they will need to make future decisions. Sincerely, Christine Burgeson • Christine McCarlie Burgeson Senior Vice President, Global Government Affairs 1301 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20004 202.626.4013—direct 202.494.7721—cell cburgeson(cD-airlines org cc: USCM Attending Mayors • • C Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:25 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; swensonannl@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - Braemar Ice Arena: welding torch blocking fire exit Attachments: welding torch l.jpg; welding torch 2 jpg Can somebody forward the attached photos I took last night at the Braemar Ice Arena of a welding torch blocking a fire exit in the east rink to the RJM Construction safety manager? I have no idea how many state fire codes are violated but this should also be brought to the attention of the Edina employee safety committee. David Frenkel I Heather Branigin From: Susie Miller Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:34 AM To: commonsenseforedina@gmail.com Cc: James Hovland; brian.recker@rjmconstruction.com Subject: Fwd: Common Sense for Edina - Braemar Ice Arena: welding torch blocking fire exit Attachments: welding torch 1 jpg; welding torch 2 jpg Good Morning David, First off, thank you very much for making us aware of the issue. This morning I reiterated safety issues with the contractors. We also removed the contractors equipment this morning. I am cc: Brian Recker with RJM for him to forward on to their safety manager. I apologize. I literally just talked to the contractor at noon yesterday about making sure the exits remained clear. We should have double checked. I have also reminded our staff to double check their exits periodically throughout their shift, regardless of the season. My cell phone number is 612-325-3392, please do not hesitate to call/text and/or cc: me on your email so we • can take care of the safety issue immediately. I am available 24/7. We are looking forward to construction wrapping up in the next couple weeks. Thank you, Susie Miller Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "James Hovland" <JHovland@EdinaMN. ov> To: "Susie Miller" <smillergEdinaMN.gov> Subject: FW: Common Sense for Edina - Braemar Ice Arena: welding torch blocking fire exit Hi Susie, Can you assist this person?? J,�- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist J 952-927-88611 Fax 952-826-9389 lbiunnoaEdinaWclov I www. EdinaMN..qov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Common Sense Edina[mai Ito: commonsenseforedi na(abg mail. com] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 8:25 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; swensonannl@grnail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - Braemar Ice Arena: welding torch blocking fire exit Can somebody forward the attached photos I took last night at the Braemar Ice Arena of a welding torch blocking a fire exit in the east rink to the RJM Construction safety manager? I have no idea how many state fire codes are violated but this should also be brought to the attention of the Edina employee safety committee. David Frenkel 19- k�l • U Heather Branigin From: Erik Hansen <ehansen@ustravel.org> • Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 2:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: USCM Info: Open Skies & Airport Modernization Dear Mayor: Earlier this week, Roger Dow, president and CEO of the U.S. Travel Association, sent the following important message regarding two resolutions that will be before you at the conference: • Resolution No. 55, Restoring a Level Playing Field through Open Skies, which U.S. Travel, representing 1,250 member organizations, and its members oppose; and • Resolution No. 101, Modernization of Airports, which U.S. Travel and its members support. I will be attending the USCM and would be pleased to discuss U.S. Travel's requests pertaining to these matters or answer questions that you may have. My contact information is below. Thank you, Erik Hansen Erik Hansen I Senior Director, Domestic Policy U.S. Travel Association 1100 New York Avenue, NW I Suite 450 ( Washington, D.C. 20005 T 202.408.2184 M 202.590.9274 Am ehansen a()ustravel.org LEARN MORE ustravel.orq I proiecttimeoff.com ( trayelcoalition.org FOLLOW US Facebook I Twitter I Linkedln U. S. TRAVE L A S S 0 C I A I 1 -0 ti U. S. T RAVE L A S S O C I A T I O N FROM THE DESK OF I --R Dear Mayor, The U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM) has a long and proud history of representing the common interests of American cities, large and small. At your upcoming Annual Conference, USCM will consider two resolutions whose impact will influence the travel and tourism industry, the future of competition in the aviation marketplace and potentially affect communities across our nation. These resolutions are: • Resolution No. 55, Restoring Level Playing Field through Open Skies, which is the U.S. Travel Association, representing 1250 member organizations, and its members oppose; and • Resolution No. 101, Modernization of Airports, which the U.S. Travel Association and its members support. Stay Neutral on Open Skies Resolution No. 55, presented by three U.S. legacy airlines—American, Delta and United—may seem innocuous but threatens to undermine a 20 -year bipartisan policy supporting competition in international aviation through Open Skies. This important, yet complex policy is the foundation of airline competition. It has spurred an international travel boom that benefits cities and destinations across America through greater traveler spending, more U.S. jobs and higher tax revenues. The "consultations" proposed in Resolution No. 55 are just the first step toward a larger goal of the U.S. legacy airlines: a freeze in new flights by the Gulf carriers. The CEOs of the U.S. legacy airlines have called for a "freeze" on new flights to the U.S., retroactive to January 2015, from Emirates, Etihad Airlines and Qatar Airways. While the proposed resolution makes no mention of their demand for a freeze, this is in fact what they have requested in their submission to the U.S. State, Commerce, and Transportation Departments. • U.S. Travel Association opposes the resolution because it will restrict competition, reduce the growth in international visitors to the U.S., take away options for American travelers, and hurt local economies all over this country. We are also very concerned about the diplomacy, security and trade consequences of rushing to reopen agreements with UAE and Qatar at the behest of three airlines. Our relationships with these countries are not limited to aviation. • Other U.S. airlines like JetBlue and Alaska Airlines oppose the Big 3 on this issue; some, like Southwest, are neutral. FedEx strongly opposes the Big 3's proposal because FedEx's ability to compete in international markets depends on the rights guaranteed under Open Skies. Taking away those rights would hurt U.S. exports. In 2014, the Gulf carriers brought 1.1 million international travelers to the 11 U.S. cities they currently serve. These visitors contributed over $4.1 billion to U.S. GDP, supported nearly 50,000 jobs and generated over $1.1 billion in federal, state and local taxes. Last week, 24 CEOs sent a letter to the Administration in support of Open Skies. In addition, the Gulf carriers have ordered 365 Boeing aircrafts, which will support 400,000 American jobs. At a time when the Big 3 are cutting international capacity and keeping ticket prices and fees high despite low fuel prices, we need more competition, not less. I hope you will agree that the Conference should remain neutral on this issue and move to table Resolution No. 55. • Modernize Airport Infrastructure Resolution No. 101, sponsored by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and tided "Modernization of Airports," supports Congressional action that would give local airport authorities the option to increase their Passenger Facility Charges (PFC). The PFC is a local airport user fee that funds infrastructure improvements and is set by each airports' governing body. Unfortunately, Congress limits the maximum PFC that airports can charge to $4.50 per passenger and has not adjusted the fee in over 15 years. This restricts the ability of airport authorities and city governments to fund critical modernization and expansion projects. The U.S. Travel Association and its membership, including major hotel chains and, convention and visitors bureaus, strongly supports Resolution No. 101 because: Mayors and airport governing bodies, not Congress or the airlines, should have the power to decide when to adjust their PFC to fund airport modernization. Congressional action to adjust the maximum PFC would not raise fees at every airport. Instead, it would simply give mayors and airport authorities the option to adjust their PFC if they require funding for a project that alleviates congestion, expands capacity, enhances airline competition or reduces airport noise. Many airports do not have the necessary funding to carry out capital improvements fast enough to keep up with growing demand and passenger needs. Not one U.S. airport currently ranks among the top 25 in the world and the American Society of Civil Engineers rates airport infrastructure a D+. There will be a projected $2.2 billion shortfall to pay for the airport improvements needed to handle growing passenger demand. We urge you and your colleagues to support Resolution No. 101, which is pro -growth, pro -competition and pro -traveler, and allows mayors and local airport authorities not Congress—to decide when to invest in airport modernization. Just as the Conference of Mayors represents all cities across the nation, so we believe that your decisions on these resolutions should be made on what's best for our national economy, local communities and American workers. By staying neutral on Open Skies policy and supporting airport infrastructure improvements, you can do just that. Sincerely, 4 Roger J. Dow President and CEO U.S. Travel Association 0 U.S. TRAVE L rl r;::t Official Card A S S O C I A T I O N 1100 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 450, Washington, D.C. 20005 TEL 202.408.8422 FAX 202.408.1255 ustravel.org feedback@ustravel.org This email was sent to EdinaMail@ci.edina.mn.us. To ensure that you continue receiving our emails, please add us to your address book or safe senders list. If you believe you have received this message in error, please unsubscribe. U.S. Travel Association 1100 New York Avenue, NW I Suite 450 1 Washington, DC 20005 P: 202.408.8422 ( F: 202.408.1255 1 feed back(cbustravel.om • • 4 Heather Branigin • From: Ross Plaetzer <ross@employersolutionsgroup.com> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 2:47 PM To: Cary Teague; Scott H. Neal; Ross Bintner Cc: jhovland@krausehovland.com; Edina Mail; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl@gmail.com Subject: Refined Lot at 4419 Grimes Attachments: IMG_4539 jpg; IMG_4535 jpg 13 Five weeks ago, South View Design had a survey done of the 4419 Grimes back corner of their property where it meets ours at 4058 Sunnyside Road because of a dispute regarding Refined trying to take almost 12 inches of our lot to benefit their clients: Cade Bitner and Brian Miller. The survey concurred with our survey of 2007. We were happy to have our land back. About 2 weeks ago we noticed a metal pole placed on our property past the pink string that marks our property line from 4419 Grimes. We thought they had placed the pole there temporarily to mark the line of their fence for their side lot. We left it there because we didn't think it was a big deal. 0 Today we saw another surveyor out there and quickly realized they were attempting to land grab again before the fence went up. We were, and remain, stunned by their blatant disregard for our property! Laura asked the surveyor what he was doing and then asked a man from Refined with long gray hair in a ponytail what was going on and who had placed the metal pole in our yard. He replied that the pole was placed there by the City of Edina. He said the post was meaningless and she should chill out. Laura told both him and the surveyor that we would sue them if they placed a fence on our property. Then Laura called Ross Bintner of the city of Edina. He called Refined and called us back stating that Refined was now claiming that that post marked the correct survey of the land. Apparently, their clients aren't satisfied with a 300 foot lot and want to take a number of inches from our lot to enhance their lot. It is our belief that Refined, South View Design and their clients Mr. Bitner and Mr. Miller just won't stop trying to take our land by whatever deceptive means possible! It's incredible that we have had to continue defending our property. • • We have included a picture of the agreed upon corner lot line. Anything else than this corner is completely disputed. Additionally, we will sue to protect our property rights if a fence goes up on our property. • • ROSS & LAURA PLAETZER I CELL: 612.940.4804 14058 SUNNYSIDE ROAD 2 a t< � y v \44 \ L ` 1 • i A� , ,•,rr *�"; " �. \ - t.i } •Yah• 4 IT .s •^ as - i� '-•`4,T'„i IF F s. ' ,• - t ,"�� !:: T 1 It �..q • ;.f.� '� �.��,{ „ . , i i 4 c r •-' , , , t �', ;, ! 7 �a . ��f ac a.l '� a i, _ ' � �< :�/ >�, ;,�✓ - Heather Branigin From: Becky Christopher <BChristopher@minnehahacreek.org> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 5:09 PM Subject: Annual Review of MCWD Capital Improvement Plan Attachments: MCWD Revised Draft CIP_5-26-15.pdf Dear City and County Administrators, Mayors, and Staff, As it does each year at this time, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD or District) is distributing its revised Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for your review and comment. Your input on the revised draft CIP is valuable in helping to identify new opportunities to work together to protect and improve water resources. This year's draft CIP reflects the District's "Two -Track" approach for project and program implementation. This approach is intended to allocate District resources to their highest and best use in addressing water resource issues throughout the watershed and allow for improved integration with community land use planning. • Focus Track: This track prioritizes projects, staff and financial resources to high need areas within the District in order to make significant, lasting improvements to the most sensitive water challenges in the watershed. • Responsive Track: The District continues to remain responsive to needs and opportunities District -wide through project partnerships, grant funding, education programming, permitting assistance, aquatic invasive species prevention, and other District resources. As reflected in the draft CIP, the District's current priority areas under the Focus Track are the Minnehaha Creek • Greenway and the Six Mile Creek Subwatershed. These areas have been identified as priorities based on factors including water resource needs and impairments, scale and complexity of the subwatersheds, opportunities created by development and redevelopment, and local partnerships and support. The Responsive Track of the CIP includes projects District -wide that are being developed in response to community requests or opportunities. These include Cost Share grant projects, flood damage repairs, and capital projects such as the Highway 101 Causeway shoreline improvements. We encourage cities and counties to approach the District with project opportunities that may be incorporated into the CIP based on timing, alignment with District goals, and available funding. This list includes all projects that are currently in development and have potential to move forward dependent on further analysis, community support, and securing of land rights and funding. In the Six Mile Creek Subwatershed, the District will be initiating a process later this year to develop a strategic implementation plan for the area in coordination with the municipalities, counties, Three Rivers Park District, and the public. This process will refine the prioritization and timing of specific projects. Another change to this years CIP is the addition of the "Funding Sources" column to reflect the District's efforts to diversify funding sources beyond the District levy. Keep in mind that "cost estimates" listed in the CIP do not reflect the true budget or levy projections, as they do not account for a variety of funding sources: carryover from past years, projects levied over multiple years, or outside funding from grants and project partners. The draft CIP can be found on the District website at: http://www.minnehahacreek.org/CIP. You are invited to submit comments on the proposed draft CIP as well as suggestions for how the District can better integrate its water resource • improvement efforts with project and land use planning in your community. Comments received will be compiled and presented to the MCWD Board of Managers for review prior to approval of the CIP. Please submit comments via mail or email (provided below) no later than July 20, 2015. • Sincerely, Becky Christopher Lead Planner & Project Manager Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55345 952-641-4512 11 www.minnehahacreek.org • • 'Projects ars listed under the expected yam of implementation. 'Cost estimates listed do not represent actual budgets fm these years. For instance, they do not account for cam• over from past years. projects that arc levied over multiple years, or outside funding front grants and project partners. 'Funding for projects listed in 2015 has alrmdv been secured and some projects am currently underway. 'Under the Two -Track approach. the District remains responsive to needs and opportunities District -wide through project partnerships. grant funding. and other District progruns, Municipalities and other partners arc encouraged to approach the District with project opportunities which my be incorporated int the CIP based on timing, alignment with District goals, and available funding. 'Under to Two -Trak approach, the District focuses sniff and financial resources to high need meas within the District in order to make significant, luting impravvmmts In to most sensitive water challenges in Elie watershed. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Capital Improvement Plan Track ISubwatershed JProject Name' Project Description JEsticausbid Cost' I Potmtlal Funding Sources 2015 District -Wide I Lend Conservation Pro :Conservation and restoration of land for water resource benefit S 2,310000 MCWD Lm (Land Conservation) DisOct-Wide Cost Shnrc Program Funding assistance for projects identified through coordination with cities, devebpers�.Imdowncrs, and other partners. S 500,UOD Lake Minnetonka Promenade at Wayzata Gant awarded for stormwater management and chloride reduction for major redevelopment project in Wayzata. S 322,290 - Responsive Track' Minnehaha Creek _. Arden Park Neighborhood Living Streets Grant awarded for area-wide stormw•atcr management as part of city of Edina road reconstruction. S 89,000 -MCWD Lew (Cost Share) Mimehaha Creek Nokomis Neighbors for Clean Water Grant awarded for stormwalor mmagemcnt for 15 dle3iva) s draining to Lake Nokomis to Mnmeepolis, S 1Ub,000 Minachoha Creek Parkway Place Towahomes Potantid t Corstmmwatcr rnrofrts and community en o anent efforts Cor townhomes in South Minneapolis. $ 100,000 . Fans Tracks Minnchaha Crack Cottagevilic Park Phase) ...,_ Collaboradan with Hopkins to manage stortnwatr runoff and expand pad- and gmotspoce along creek. ;_9, ., ..,, 2,268,388 S 1,785,388 City of Hopkins, $483,WO Clem Water Legary Groin,,,,, , Grecaway Powell Road Slormvcaler Diversion Col loberotion with St. Louis Pork to divert 217 acres of stormwater runoff. S 1.0 12,9M '$506,468 Public Facilities Authority, $506,468 MCWD Let Pro eels 2015 are S 6 92,614 2016 District -Wide :Land Conservation Program lConservation ord restoration of land Cor water resource benefit. S 2.500,000 MCWD Let d Conservation) Responsive Track' District -Wide Cost Share Proam .Funding assistance for Projects identified through coordination with cities, developers, landowners and other parumrs. S 1,000.000 MCWD Lev Cost Sham) Minnehaha Cmek Flood Damage Repairs Re air of sneambank erosion ranking from 2014 flood. S 815,000 Federal Emergency Mata ement Agency Potential projects identified to date: Powtil-Meudowbrook Stormwatar Collaboration with St. Louis Park and private business to manage 36 acres of stormwater runoffs Oatiore 3.5 acre wetland S 2.030,960 S 1530.960 pri, SS6D 000 MCWD Lever (Projaets)IDEEDMennephn County Minnchaha Crock Greene, Knoollwood Mali .... _ Collaboration vvtOt SL Logia Pad and private business to managq hO.aCres oCsto..... atter rsan ...._.. _ S 4,483 027 $ 16UU.000 Pn ate 52,883 027 MCWD Lew (ProjexLsyGnda _ ... ' _ Meodowbrook Golf Course ....... Collaboration with Mhtncapdis Park and Recreation Board for sueam restoration, fktad c and ioereaacd flood storage __ . ma .. _... ........ ..... ._........ � S 3.120 ODO $2 020.0W FEMA. $1.100000 MCWD I.ev$_(ProjeMYMPRB/Grants _- ... Focus Trac'.` .... Himwthe Golf Coune Collaboration with Mimeo alis Park and Recreation Bond b r nood aodittina storitiaidkx rtmoff. ':' $ 1.490.000 :51,490 000 FEMA, slormwaler numagamentosts and sowees TBD Potential projcets identified m dam: _? _ j .... ......... .__. Si, Mile Marsh Sie Mde Marsh Infiltration SMC- Pannerst ii.vei pri ate landowners m address nutrient loedtrtg m Pierson Lake, vi $ 788,600 MCWD Ory lProjecq) ....._. Marsh/Wasserman Wetknd Restoration ... .. ... _ Parmershi with Vicloriaanddevcloersm rcstorewe0onds and reduce nutridaiXondin to Wasserman. S __. ..... 721.300 MCWD Levu Projects irate 2016 Total! S 17,008,887 2017 District -Wide Land Coaser•atim Program Conservation and restoration of land for waWr resource benefit S 2504000 ;MCWD Lev (Lund Conservation) District -Wide '.Cost Share Program i Funding assistance for roiccts idcnti fled through coordination with cities, dcvxlC Gte'Slandowars, and other partners. S 1,000,000 =:MCWD Lev (Cost Sharc) Lake Minnetonka Grays Bay Hwv fill Causumay 1 Partnership with Herne in County to protect and enhance shortimesalang the Hwy Ci)1:aCLake Minnetonka. .. $ 1,604,308 .Sl 574,308 MC%VD Lew(Projects). 530,000 H®a in Countv Responsive Track' Lake Minnetotke 'Flood Damage Repairs Repair of streambank erosion resulting from 2014 flood S 110.000 :Federal Emergency Mom ement Agency Long )-eke Creek -Flood Damage Repairs ',Re air of streambank erosion resulting from 2014 flood. -- $ 77,000 -:Federal Emcr nc Mom amcnl A cocv Painter Crock Flood Damage Repairs air ofsucambank erosion resulting from 2014 flood. $ 30,500 -Federal Ementeriery Management A encu Painter Creek Pointer Creek Weiland Restoration (Pott.) :Potential partnership with Amy Corps or En mcerf't0 estore w cdand'and habitus. $ 870.000 ($565,000 Section 206, 5305,000 MCWD Lev • (Projects) -Pacntid projeeu identified to time: :. Drainage Hop for vvumCand load reduction. $ 199 750 f99 875 Public Facilities 4u0tonty,$99 87> MCWD Lever (Projects) Mimehahe Creel .k CotmSaD Pad Phase 8 �._ _. Collaboration with Hopkins t manage3 ¢tormsv atter nuw P'_..,_. ander_ev! end 8rmo.npace ai B. creaA $ .._. 469000 Gq of Hopkins Granw,y, .... Arden Park Stream Restoration .. .. Callaborotion with Edina on strcambadr kestrmmandtca�grdd rovements for M mchoha Creek along Ardcn,Pml ' S _. _. 254 900 MCWD Levy (Projects) _ .................. Focus Tracks Mimehaha Crock cacc.",e Trails !.Collaboration with SL Louis Park to invciV ' Crack crossing and provide safe passage for nails. TBD SMC WD Lav (Projects) Potential projects idenlif cd to dam:....... ...... : District will mdertdce a planning effort to devvla an integrated investment The Si, Mile Marsh ' Parlev Lake Internal Load Manigement 8 P with nalafYlEoNmrs tl.eddr ss nutncnt load t Parley Lala adreno 0 .r '� c ` -- -- -- - - - , $ 231 600 --framework. Potential sources my include: MCWD Levy, Clean Water Legacy, Turbtd/Lunsten Welland Restoration .. PaMerthrp with pn 13adawncrs t address nuurcnLloadm to Turbid LnF.e .. „'.; .. _,. g .... ....... _.... _. .... _- f 496 300 ' ..... ..... .. _. Pubic Facilities Authority. Section 206, project pumas. Six Mile Mmth Infiltration SMC-55 .Collaboration wt(hA—,Bonifwms to addn-ssauvient loadin to Mud Lake and flooding and channel crosioa S 590.700 2017 Tota4 S 8,434,053 2018 District -Wide Land Conservation Program lComervation and restratian'of:land for..wincr sauce beircft Is 2.500,D00 MCWD Lev Land Conservation District -Wide Cost Share Pro Fmdin assistance far ro'cetsidentified'throu coordination with cities, developers. landowners, and other partners. S 1,000 000 MCWD Lcv (Cost Share) Responsive Track' Glemon Lake Flood Damage Re airs Re ar of ttrcanhbank erasion resulting from 2014 flood, S L 1.600 Federal EmergencyMona marl Agency Painter Crack Painter Crock Weiland Restoration (SOB-) IPotential partnership with Ar ry Corps of En •maces to ratorc w'ctlmd and habitat $ 243.000 $158,000 Section 206, $85.000 MCWD Law (Projects) Si, Mile Marsh Flood Damage Repairs Re air of sbcambank erosion resultinx from 2014 flood. S 34 000 Federal Einer encu Management Agency -Potential projects identified to date: 325 Blake Rd Implementation of treatment Pradices t accept 2G8 tares of runoff from Powell Rd and lute SL stommater diversions S 2328 500 Pubhe Facilities Authorih• Mimdhaha Crack Creativity .,_ _. Cquagav illc Part: Phase 111 ..._... _.. ... .. _. e c CoBaboretian vvrUr Hopkins to manage strmwnter runoff and espatrdpad and 3reen.space along rc k. _. . i..f. _ _ _ _ .. _ ,,. _ ...__. ...__._—._.......... _ 276000 MCWD Levy Projects _ .. .. ._.. .. (Projects) _ ...._. _._ . _.. .............. ............ Focus Tracks Mcadowbrook to Cedw Trail Conaetlon Collaboration with SL Louis Park and S W LRT to redesign creak crowing, provide safe passage for Mimchaho Creek Cmmveay S 200,000 IDNR toed Trail Connections Program itra0s and coma( the grecaustv to the Cedar Regional Trail. Potentiaiprapatt identified to date:„ iThe District will undertake a planning effort to develop an integrated investment Si., Mile Marsh _ _ Hdsleds Bm• Tributary Alum Inlectioa System - ---Collaboration with MimetrisW t reduce nutrient loading )mom Six Mile Creek and internal loading in Halsteds Bac. S . . ........... . 7,728 b00 fmmeurork, Potential sources any include: MCWD Levy, Clean Water Legacy, - Holstods Bay Internal Load Manintmicant S I,IOU,000 ',Public Facilities Autnerhy. Section 206, eel partners. 2018 Total' S 15,421300 ; 'Projects ars listed under the expected yam of implementation. 'Cost estimates listed do not represent actual budgets fm these years. For instance, they do not account for cam• over from past years. projects that arc levied over multiple years, or outside funding front grants and project partners. 'Funding for projects listed in 2015 has alrmdv been secured and some projects am currently underway. 'Under the Two -Track approach. the District remains responsive to needs and opportunities District -wide through project partnerships. grant funding. and other District progruns, Municipalities and other partners arc encouraged to approach the District with project opportunities which my be incorporated int the CIP based on timing, alignment with District goals, and available funding. 'Under to Two -Trak approach, the District focuses sniff and financial resources to high need meas within the District in order to make significant, luting impravvmmts In to most sensitive water challenges in Elie watershed. Heather Branigin 40 From: Jonathan Adler<Jonathan.Adler@deweysquare.com> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 12:16 PM To: Jonathan Adler Subject: USCM REMINDER: Support Res. #55 Today @4:45pm; Level The Playing Field for American Workers Attachments: Open Skies Resolution and Background Information.pdf Good morning - This is a reminder that Resolution No. 55 will be considered TODAY at 4:45pm during the International Affairs Committee Meeting (Imperial A, ballroom levels. Please be sure to attend the meeting and vote YES on this important resolution to protect Open Skies and American airline jobs. As you know, the governments of Qatar and the UAE have provided $42 billion in subsidies and other unfair benefits to their state-owned airlines in the last decade in clear violation of U.S. Open Skies policy. The Gulf carriers' massive government subsidies have enabled them to flood the U.S. market with flights, which threatens the U.S. airline industry, the U.S. economy, and U.S. jobs. Importantly, each round trip flight that is lost or foregone to these Gulf carriers costs over 800 American jobs. If the U.S. airlines are pushed off of international routes, they will be forced to cut back on domestic routes too, which would harm airline service to small and mid-sized communities. • We thank you for your continued support by joining over 45 Co-sponsors to pass Resolution No. 55. The vote will occur TODAY at 4:45 in Imperial A on the ballroom level during the International Affairs Committee meeting. Thank you again for your support, The Partnership for Open and Fair Skies Resolution No. 55 Submitted by: The Honorable Elizabeth Kautz, Mayor of Burnsville The Honorable Ralph Becker, Mayor of Salt Lake City The Honorable Steve Benjamin, Mayor of Columbia The Honorable Betsy Hodges, Mayor of Minneapolis The Honorable Betsy Price, May of Fort Worth The Honorable Beth Van Duyne, Mayor of Irving RESTORING A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD THROUGH OPEN SKIES POLICY 1. WHEREAS, for decades Open Skies agreements have brought great benefits to U.S. travelers, U.S. airlines and the U.S. economy by creating a framework for competitive, fair market air travel between countries; and 2. WHEREAS, cities across the country rely on a robust and vibrant airline industry to create and maintain jobs, and U.S. airlines support 11 million American jobs as well as $1.5 trillion in nationwide economic activity; and • 3. WHEREAS, American companies and U.S. carriers do best when they can • compete in an open and fair market that promotes a level playing field for all; and 4. WHEREAS, the nations of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have violated Open Skies policy by funneling over $40 billion in government subsidies and other unfair benefits to their state-owned airlines (Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline), distorting the international aviation market and undermining fair competition; and 5. WHEREAS, these subsidies pose a direct threat to the U.S. airline industry and thousands of American jobs including an average of 821 jobs per each roundtrip flight lost to these carriers; and 6. WHEREAS, unfair competition from the Gulf carriers could have a negative economic impact on American carriers that could lead to the elimination of flights and routes to mid-sized and smaller American cities, 7. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that The United States Conference of Mayors urges the U.S. government to initiate consultations with Qatar and the UAE as provided for within Open Skies agreements to address this issue. Projected Cost: None 233 • 0 • Government -Subsidized Gulf Carriers: PARTNERSHIP FOR t A Threat to U.S. Jobs and our Economy OPEN & FAIR SKIES A LEVEL FLAYING FIELD FOR ALL History Since 1992, the United States has signed more than 100 Open Skies agreements with countries around the world. These agreements promote growth in international airline travel by allowing each country's carriers free and open access to the other country's market. Open Skies agreements require the governments of each country to keep the playing field level and ensure fair competition. The agreements allow either government to open consultations in order to address any problems or concerns. Current Situation Two of the countries that have signed Open Skies agreements with the United States — Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) — are distorting the marketplace by funneling billions of dollars in subsidies to their state-owned airlines, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline. Those massive government subsidies make for an un -level playing field and are a clear violation of Open Skies policy. Evidence gathered during a global, two-year investigation has revealed the following: The governments of Qatar and the UAE have provided $42 billion in subsidies and other unfair benefits to their state-owned carriers since 2004 alone. The state-owned Gulf airlines aren't subject to corporate income taxes or fuel taxes and are exempt from costly requirements imposed on their foreign competitors, allowing the carriers to avoid paying their own way. The governments of Qatar and the UAE have banned unions and suppressed the rights of employees in order provide their state- owned airlines with below-market labor costs. SPECIFIC SUBSIDIES TO GULF CARRIERS • More than $12 billion in Interest Free Loans & Shareholder Advances • More than $11 billion in Equity Infusions, Grants, & Future Committed Subsidies • Almost $9 billion in Interest Savings from Government Loan Guarantees & Interest Free Loans • More than $2 billion in Government Assumption of Fuel Hedging Losses • More than $2 billion In Subsidized Airport Charges • Almost $2 billion In Passenger Fee Exemptions, Rebates and other Miscellaneous Subsidies U. S..Jobs at Risk The massive subsidies and other unfair benefits being provided to the Gulf carriers by their respective governments in direct contradiction to Open Skies policy are distorting the marketplace by allowing those airlines to rapidly expand their fleets and international routes into the U.S. market without regard for profitability. That unfair competition is threatening the U.S. airline industry, American jobs and the U.S. economy. Every daily international roundtrip flight that is lost by a U.S. carrier due to unfair competition with the government -subsidized Gulf carriers comes at a cost of more than 800 U.S, jobs. Given that the U.S. airline industry drives nearly $1.5 trillion in U.S. economic activity and supports more than 11 million American jobs, the consequences of allowing the unfair competition with government -subsidized Gulf carriers to continue is clear. The Solution We urge the U.S. government to open consultations with Qatar and the UAE in order to level the playing field by addressing the massive, multi -billion dollar subsidies that they are providing to their state-owned airlines. The U.S. government should also seek a freeze on the introduction of new passenger service to the U.S. by the Gulf carriers during these consultations. For more information visit www.openandfairskies.com or follow us on Twitter at @OpenFairSkies Heather Branigin • From: David Frenkel <frenkel@att.net> Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 10:36 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Stop city authorized travel to South Carolina until confederate flag removed from SC State Capital The church shootings in Charleston, SC last week brought back to the front page the issue of the confederate flag flying at the state capital of South Carolina. I lived in Virginia prior to moving to Edina and I have a pretty strong understanding of the culture of the confederacy which is still painful for the African-American community and is a symbol of hatred for the majority of Americans. Many national leaders like Mitt Romney and President Obama have said the confederated flag should be removed from the state capital in SC. The NAACP also has a boycott of SC until the flag has been removed. I would strongly suggest that city of Edina sanctioned travel to SC be stopped until the confederate flag is removed from the SC capital. David Frenkel 612-237-1966 1 40 Heather Branigin From: Bruce Kieffer <bruce@kieffer.us> Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 5:54 PM To: Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: US Internet Dear Mayor and Council Members, Please help move along the fiber wiring of our city by US Internet. We need competition to the outrageous prices Comcast charges, and we need faster better internet service. Thanks, Bruce Kieffer brucegkieffer.us • 0 June 19, 2015 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 50th St W Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: Earlier this year, Metropolitan Council staff completed a 2015 update of regional and local forecasts. We proposed local forecast revisions, reflecting an updated (and lower) regional total forecast and more detailed information about land supply and land use. Most cities and towns are affected by the reduced regional totals. Beth Reetz conveyed Council staff's draft local forecasts to you and invited comments and questions in an April 19 letter. We appreciate your attention to this work. The comments of local officials improve our understanding of local plans and growth possibilities. We have considered your input and have made adjustments to local forecasts based upon these comments. The table below shows the local draft forecast that we shared in April, alongside the revised forecast that we presented to the Council's Community Development Committee on June 15. orecast Revision for Edina - Population 2020 2030 204C Draft forecasts 49,800 50,300 50,800 (2015 update) Edina Comments Revision 49,800 52,500 53,000 22,000 22,800 23,500 51,800 54,000 56,100 24,000 26,000 — -- -- 22,000 23,800 24,500 51,800 54,000 56,100 Edina staff communicated that the City expects higher levels of future households and population, exceeding what Council staff have been able to model. City staff cited land available for multifamily housing in the Southdale district and recent development in that area. Based on our estimation of land supply in the Southdale area, our understanding of current land use guidance, and factors that could limit Edina's development potential, Council staff increased Edina's household forecast to reflect growth of 3,800 households during the 2010-40 forecast period. 0 The full Metropolitan Council will consider the final set of local forecasts in July. These forecasts will be incorporated into regional system plans, per Minnesota Statutes 473.146, and included in the System Statements that the Council will issue this fall. Communities will have further opportunities to comment on their forecast through System Statement reviews and Comprehensive Plan Updates or Amendments. --- mom 390 Robert Street North I Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P. 651.602.1000 1 TTY. 651.291.0904 1 metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer • We look forward to further discussions with your community. Sincerely, Todd Graham Principal Forecaster, Community Development Division cc: Council Member Steve Elkins Scott Neal, City Manager METROPOLITAN C 0 U N C I L PHOf&ATS • , T P. O. Box 24073 Edina, MN 55424 June 19, 2015 Jim Hovland Mayor City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: S.D. 49 Democrats Annual Summer Picnic Dear Jim: Edina and West Bloomington Democrats, together with our friends and neighbors from Eden Prairie and Minnetonka, will once again get together for our S.D. 49 Democrats annual summer picnic on Saturday July 25, 2015, from noon to 3:00 p.m. We expect a great crowd and would be honored by your presence. Please consider this • letter to be a hearty invitation for you to mix and mingle as our guest. If you so choose, you will have an opportunity to say hello or make a short speech with the program beginning about 1:30 p.m. For your information, the picnic will be held, as usual, at Rosland Park Shelter, 4300 West 66th Street, Edina (next to the Edina Aquatic Center). We look forward to seeing you there. If possible, we would appreciate knowing if you can make it: timothy.obrienkfaegrebd.com or (612) 766-8322. Best wishes, 61- Ok Tim O'Brien Chair US.57817247.01 • Heather Branigin From: Tim Warner <tim.warner7468@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 10:39 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Fwd: Major Drainage issue impacting nieghborghood Attachments: 6-2014.jpg; 6-2015 jpg Mayor Jim Hoveland and the City Council of Edina I am a long time Edina resident currently residing at 6020 Schaefer road. I am writing to see if I (as well as my fellow neighbors) can get any relief from the poorly designed drainage system in our neighbor hood. I will be brief as possible in my description and am more than happy to get into the details if there is benefit. There is a 10 inch PVC drain pipe that is on the property line of our backyard and our neighbor on View Lane. This pipe was installed by Irwin Construction, the company that built the house on the south end of Schaefer and View Lane. This pipe was intended to drain the backyards. Water is supposed to flow south into a sewer catch basin and ultimately flow east to the street sewers, under Schaefer road and into Bredeson Park. Unfortunately this does not work. The pipe actually acts as a back-flow when the sewer is over tasked and it floods the neighborhood. My wife and I spent • several thousand dollars repairing our basements in the past from water damage when more severe incident has occurred. The pictures I have attached are an example of a minor incident this morning and a more severe event last year. I have more pictures including ones from the 2013 event that cost us our basement and if there is value in seeing them, let me know and I will forward. I have talked to various people at the city in the 4 years I have lived at this property and the stock response I have received is "the city did not put the pipe in so it is not our issue". My challenge to that is that the city approved installation of the pipe. allowed it to be tied into the city sewage system and no one that resides in the neighborhood today was involved in the decision making process ergo they onus of responsibility falls on the approver; in this case the City of Edina. Like many residents of Edina, my wife and I were raised in Edina, went to High School here and returned to live here later in life. This issue and the laissez faire' responses I have received from the city to date are not what I have come to respect as a member of the Edina community for a quarter century. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with any one who is willing to listen with an open ear. Beast Regards Tim Warner Tim earner 612-644-1956 ,aw k0w Yi` Milk ow Nb i ` `10 M' i Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Dear Mayor Hovland: Hieb, Mary (MHFA) <Mary.Hieb@state.mn.us> Monday, June 22, 2015 2:13 PM James Hovland Minnesota Housing - Notification of Local Official D7720_M17164_66West_Edina_Hen nepin_NOLO.pdf Minnesota Housing and its funding partners have received a request for multifamily funding referenced on the attached Notification of Local Official form. We provide selected applicants financing for the development, construction, acquisition and rehabilitation of decent, safe and affordable rental housing. As part of the review process, Minnesota Housing is interested in receiving your community's comments regarding the proposed development(s). Please provide any comments you may have on the proposal(s) to Minnesota Housing by July 23, 2015. If you have previously submitted comments on the following proposal(s), it is not necessary to do so again, unless you wish to add new or additional information. Please address your comments to: Minnesota Housing Mary Hieb 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101-1998 Mary.Hieb@state.mn.us If you have any questions, please call Mary Hieb at (651) 296-8185, or toll free at 1-800-657- 3701. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely, r Diana Lund Multifamily Production Manager Mary Hieb I Minnesota Housing 1 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300 1 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651.296-81851800.657.3647 1 tty:651.297.2361 1 www.mnhousing.gov Minnesota Housing finances and advances affordable housing opportunities for low and moderate income Minnesotans to enhance quality of life and foster strong communities. [Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.) • • • :I 04 Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Notification of Local Official 1. Please provide the following information in typewritten form and submit electronically. 2. Please provide the name of the local official jurisdiction and name and address of the political jurisdiction's chief executive officer (in most cases Mayor) in which the proposed project will be located. Name of Political Jurisdiction:Ed'Ina Scott Neal City Manager 952-826-0401 Name of Chief Executive Officer Title Telephone 4801 W. 50th St. Edina MN 55424 Address City State Zip snealC@edinamn.gov Email address 66 West Edina 333066 th Street West Development Name city Street Address • Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative Developer ❑ ❑ ® ❑ # of Buildings New Substantial Adaptive Historic Construction Rehabilitation Reuse Building Unit Sizes Proposed Proposed Unit Mix Rent Amounts Efficiency / SRO: 39 30% of Income 1 Bedroom: 2 Bedroom: 3 Bedroom: 4 Bedroom: Total: 39 Brief description of proposal: The adaptive reuse of an existing branch bank building, plus a new building addition, to provide supportive housing for homeless young adults Notification of Local Official - HTC Form 18 1 of 1 4/2015 Twin Cities HRC PO Box 3774 Minneapolis, MN 55403 June 17, 2015 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: HUMAN RIGHTS CANIP AIGN, • On behalf of the Twin Cities Human Rights Campaign (HRC), we invite you to become a member of the Honorary Co -Host Committee for the 26th Annual Twin Cities HRC Dinner on Saturday, September 12, at the Minneapolis Convention Center. We anticipate nearly 1,000 HRC members and supporters will join us to celebrate while also answering the call to action of this year's theme, "Stronger Together — Moving Equality Forward." LGBT Americans may soon have the freedom to marry in all 50 states. This does not, however, change the fact that in 29 of those states lesbian, gay, and bisexual citizens can be fired from their job or kicked out of their apartment just because of who they are and whom they love. And in 31 states our transgender brothers and sisters face similar discrimination and violence, even as Caitlyn Jenner, Laverne Cox and others have • raised visibility and awareness for transgender issues. Joining the Honorary Committee lends your name to the list of high-profile HRC supporters who work to ensure their communities value the equal treatment of LGBT people everywhere. We ask only that you purchase a dinner ticket and lend us the use of your name for the evening to promote LGBT equality. We also invite you to attend the VIP Reception at no extra cost, to mingle with fellow Honorary Committee members, corporate sponsors, community leaders, and other HRC supporters. The VIP reception is from 5:00 to 6:00 PM followed by the general reception and silent auction, and then dinner starting at 7:30 PM. To confirm your acceptance, sponsor a table, purchase additional tickets, or for any other questions, please contact Joshua Crosson at (202) 957-2677 or joshuacrosson@amail.com. Please ensure your tickets are purchased by our program deadline of August 5, 2015. Thank you for your support of HRC! Sincerely, Tal Anderson and Alicia Schwarz 2015 HRC Twin Cities Dinner Co-chairs The Human Rights Campaign is America's largest non-profit advocacy organization working to ensure basic equal rights for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender citizens. With more than a million members and supporters from all • walks of life, HRC's mission is, in part: "...to ensure that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans can be open, honest and safe at home, at work, and in the community. " 1'() IJ,, 3-7_I \linrtr.y)-,h>. \1N 55403 1 web IR(:.-,rg, Heather Branigin isFrom: Charlie Vander Aarde <charlie@metrocitiesmn.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2015 2:49 PM Cc: Patricia Nauman; Laurie Jennings Subject: Metro Cities Transportation and General Government Policy Committee - Topic Solicitation Dear Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Member: Metro Cities is in the process of preparing for this year's policy committees (Transportation/General Government, Housing/Economic Development, Municipal Revenues and Metropolitan Agencies). As a member of our Transportation and General Government Policy Committee, we greatly appreciate your participation and service and look forward to having you participate in the work of the committee this year. As we undertake committee planning, we would appreciate your feedback and suggestions to assist us with making sure that key topics of interest are addressed by the committee. Please take a couple moments to provide us with your responses to two questions below. You can reply to this email: 1. Are there specific topics you would like discussed in this year's committee? 2. Are there speakers you would like to address the committee this year? Also, if you don't plan to participate in the committee process this year, please let me know. If I don't hear from you, I'll assume you plan to join us, and will send the committee information to you prior to the first meeting. As we did last year, each committee will have three meetings. Below is a schedule of our Transportation and General Government Policy Committee meetings for this year: Monday, July 13, 11:00.am —1:30 pm Monday, August 10, 11:00 am —1:30 pm Monday, September 21, 11:00 am —1:30 pm Lunch will be provided at each meeting. Location: LMC Building, 145 University Ave W., St. Paul, MN 55103 Thanks again! We hope to see you this summer. Sincerely, Charlie Vander Aarde Metro Cities Desk: 651-215-4001 Mobile: 651-366-7564 @MetroCitiesMN www.metrocitiesmn _org is Heather Branigin From: Jenn Heinold <events@email.westernpowersummit.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 8:10 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Are you available Nov. 2-4? Dear JIM, The 2nd Annual Western Power Summit is a few short months away, and I would like to personally invite you to Las Vegas November 2-4, 2015 to convene with executives across the West as we address the challenges facing western electric power markets: energy storage, regulatory issues, energy transmission in the west, the water -energy nexus, pressing financial affairs and more. Western Power Summit and SNL Energy have partnered to develop a conference program that will provide insight on the challenges facing senior -level executives and additional stakeholders who are invested in the western power industry. This partnership ensures the Western Power Summit will feature content and facilitate discussions at a level that executives just won't find at other events. I hope you will join me in Las Vegas November 2-4 to convene with your peers and participate in conversations that will shape the future of the industry. Submit your registration with code INVITE by July 3rd and receive a discounted rate of up to $500 off the full rate. Sincerely, Jenn Heinold Vice President of Events, Access Intelligence jheinoldCa)accessintel.cpm This message was sent to JI-IOVLANDOEDINAMN.GOV Access Intelligence LLC • 11000 Richmond Avenue • Suite 690 • Houston, Tx 77042 Update my preferences I Unsubscribe 0 • 0 Heather Branigin • From: David Egan <david@komenminnesota.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 3:08 PM To: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmail.com ; Kevin Staunton; Scott H. Neal Cc: Char Plitman; Denise Blumberg-Tendle; Lanny Friedman; Megan Spaulding; peterh@bloomingtonlm.com; yeexx006@umn.edu; skalbrecht@bremer.com; valhallgren@aol.com; (berg@fredlaw.com; tufia200l@yahoo.com; haddad.tufia@mayo.edu; peterh@visi.com; bethgarfinkel@yahoo.com Subject: Thank You! Attachments: 2015 Race for the Cure Crowd Shot jpg Dear Mayor Hovland, Mr. Scott Neal and City Council Members: On behalf of Susan G. Komen Minnesota and all of the people we serve, we'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for all that the City of Edina did for us at the 2015 Race for the Cure that was held this past Mother's Day (May 10th), at Southdale Center. We've proudly moved the Race for the Cure back home to Edina and we couldn't be happier - and, more importantly, our Race participants and supporters couldn't be happier. We know that we couldn't have a successful Race for the Cure event without your partnership and support. We had a great Race Day this year and an awesome turnout. A special shout -out to Lieutenant Tim Olson, Sergeant Ryan Schultz, and Jane Timm (and her great team) for all of their time, patience and expertise in helping us plan and execute the event - and another huge shout -out to the entire Edina Police, Fire, and Administration Departments for their awesome efforts and for keeping us all safe and secure. • As is always the case, we know that we have a few adjustments to make in order to make the experience even better and more special for our participants in future years, but we're very pleased to be back home at Southdale Center in Edina. Thanks again for all of your great support! We really appreciate it! Take care. David, Char and the Race for the Cure Team David Egan Co -Executive Director Susan G. Komen@ Minnesota 960 Southdale Center Edina, MN 55435 Phone: 952-746-1760 Fax: 952-746-1763 www. komenm innesota.org We LIVE Here. We RACE Here. We SAVE LIVES Here! Save the Date: Race for the Cure - May 8, 2016 - Southdale Center This e-mail message is intended only for use by the individual or entity named above and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by telephone or e-mail and then delete this message and destroy any copies. • ABe eco -friendly. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Heather Branigin • From: Maher, Maureen A <mmaherl@Fairview.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 3:57 PM To: Ferguson, Susan M; Lundberg, Jonathan E; Farr, Susan; Thomas, Mark; Williams, Annie D; Lynn, Jacquie W; 'Luigi@aurorainvestments.com'; Kearns, Kari A; Whitlock, Lynn M; 'Sandra Schue'; Pieper, Stacey M; 'wolson@voa.org'; James Hovland; Nokleby, Jill A; Stephen Michals; Lynn, Jacquie W; Williams, Annie D Cc: Maher, Maureen A Subject: Aurora Ground Breaking Celebration Event Schedule and Location Attachments: Event Schedule.doc; Ground -Breaking Invitation.doc Hello Again - I wanted to update on where the event will be held next week. From France Avenue -- head west on W 65th Street -- you will see the event tents located right next to the entrance to the parking ramp. Park in the ramp and walk over to the event tents. The program will be held under the tents, then we will walk across the street to the site for the photos. Please let me know if you have questions or need additional information. I am excited to see you all next week! Maureen Maher • From: Maher, Maureen A Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 11:38 AM To: Ferguson, Susan M; Lundberg, Jonathan E; Farr, Susan; Thomas, Mark; Williams, Annie D; Lynn, Jacquie W; 'Luigi@aurorainvestments.com'; Kearns, Kari A; Whitlock, Lynn M; 'Sandra Schue'; Pieper, Stacey M; 'wolson@voa.org'; 'jhovland@EdinaMN.gov'; Nokleby, Jill A; Maher, Maureen A Subject: Aurora Ground Breaking Celebration Event Schedule Good Morning - Attached please find the event schedule for the Aurora on France Ground Breaking Celebration. I also included a copy of the event invitation. The program will start at 9:15 a.m. If you are speaking during the program, please arrive by 9:00 a.m. I will have more details this week about where the photos will be taken. But both the program and event photos will be on/near our site at 6500 France Avenue in Edina. Most likely a block or so down from France on 65th Thank you for your participation! Maureen Maher Marketing Consultant Ebenezer • The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material, including 'protected health information'. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby A URORA on France Vibrant Senior Living and Care Ground Breaking Celebration Event Schedule and Approximate Timing Tuesday, June 30, 2015 Logistics TIMING CONTACT(S) Setup and staging 8:00 a.m. — 9:00 a.m. Sandra, Maureen, Kari, Lynn, Stacey, Lyndon, Sue Brief Program APPX. TIMING Welcome/Ceremony begins 9:15 a.m. Susan Farr Introduces Mayor Hovland Welcome To Edina 9:15 a.m. Mayor Jim Hovland Ebenezer/Aurora Partnership 9:18 a.m. Luigi Bernardi, Aurora Investments Ebenezer/VOA Partnership 9:21 a.m. Wayne Olson, VOA The Community/Special thanks 9:25 a.m. Mark Thomas, Ebenezer Photos Entertainment TIMING Lyndon Peterson One Man Band 9:30-10:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast • • • We are excited to invite you! Dear colleagues, business associates, and friends: We have broken ground on Aurora on France Senior Living --our new assisted living community connected to Fairview Southdale Hospital in Edina, Minnesota. We invite you to join us as we celebrate the construction of this premier senior living community offering independent living, assisted living, memory care, care suites and transitional care scheduled to open in Fall of 2016. We hope you canj oin us. Ground -Breaking Celebration g AU ORA on France Vibrant Senior Living-, and Care Tuesday, June 30, 2015 9 —10:30 a.m. 6500 France Avenue South in Edina (look for the event tents) Brief program followed by photos and refreshments Parking is available in the Fairview Southdale Hospital ramp. RSVP by June 26 by calling (612) 874-3432—Thank you rVolunteers EBENEZER of America We are excited to invite you! Dear colleagues, business associates, and friends: We have broken ground on Aurora on France Senior Living—our new assisted living community connected to Fairview Southdale Hospital in Edina, Minnesota. We invite you to join us as we celebrate the construction of this premier senior living community offering independent living, assisted living, memory care, care suites and transitional care scheduled to open in Fall of 2016. We hope you can join us. Ground -Breaking Celebration 3 AU ORA on France Vibrant Senior Living and Care Tuesday, June 30, 2015 9 —10:30 a.m. 6500 France Avenue South in Edina Gook for the event tents) Brief program followed by photos and refreshments Parking is available in the Fairview Southdale Hospital ramp. --RSVP by June 26 by calling (612) 874-3432—Thankyou-- Volunteers L? EBENEZER of America= • 0 Heather Branigin • From: Valentine David <foxboyl@earthlink.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 4:01 PM To: James Hovland Subject: ready to frame Attachments: classy 3jpg jpg • 0 Heather Branigin From: Tao at Environment America<tao=environmentamerica.org@mai 121.wdc03.rsgsv.net> on behalf of Tao at Environment America <tao@environmentamerica.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 4:16 PM To: James Hovland Subject: REMINDER - Fuel efficiency sign -on letter Please support fuel efficiency by signing our letter. View this email in your browser Dear IlMayor 1-lovland, • f am writing to remind you About >......: s;. .... _.'... I . in suppnrtof continued improvement in fuel efficiency standards for semi -trucks, buses, vans, and other large vehicles. Your support as an elected official and steward of the environment is critical to passing strong legislation. As you may have heard. the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced a draft ru-sc last Friday that would make medium- and heavy- duty trucks more fuel-efficient. This rule would therefie•e save rnoney on fuel sine vehicles would use !css (>l' it. It complements the work. these agencies have already done to advance the. Duel efficiency of passenger vehicles. At the links below, please find some new material on the draft rule: • An V:=xJ,„on the statistics of this rule; • A tit+.ja about the draft rule announcement; and • The drat ruie= itself. As you know, we at Environment America are circulating 3.sLgnti on letter to local elected officials. The leper applauds the Obama Administration, EPA, and NHTSA ftrr their work on this draft rule and urges the administration to finalize the rule in its strongest possible form. Your signature can help ensure that America continues to make progress on this important issue. to back improved medium- and heavy-duty fuel etticiency and emission standards. We anticipate closing the letter to signatures by July 15, so please sign the letter ss pronptly us you are able. Again, you can sign the letter by visiting tlhis and filling out the form. 0 Thank you for your time and consideration! Questions? Contact. Travis Madsen Campaign Director Environment: America tt tri ;c E�rivirong-tentanierica.=g (303) 573-3871 x383 Sincerely, Tao Marwell Intern, Global Warming Environment America tao(a)environmentamerica,org (202)-683-1250 x301 Copyright @ 2095 Environment America, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you or your city have taken action on climate. Our mailing address is: Environment America 218 D Street SE Washington, DG 20003 Add us to your address book unsubscribe,from this list update subscription preferences 0 Heather Branigin isFrom: Ross Plaetzer <ross@employersolutionsgroup.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 5:22 PM To: jhovland@krausehovland.com'; 'mai l@Edina MN.gov'; 'kstaunton@EdinaMN.gov'; Irstewart@EdinaMN.gov'; 'mbrindle@comcast.net'; 'swensonannl@gmail.com' Cc: Cary Teague Subject: FWD: Salt water pools From: Laura Plaetzer <laura@plaetzer.us> Date: June 24, 2015 at 5:05:53 PM CDT To: Jeff Brown <jbrown@edinamn gov>, sneal@edinamn.gov, Phil Mero <phil.mero@gmail.com > Subject: Salt water pools Everything I've read tonight about salt water pool water draining on a front lawn is strictly prohibited because it is so dangerous for lawns, vegetation and wild life. We live in the watershed district, which means this water will go directly into our lakes and streams. I'm calling the Minnehaha Watershed District tomorrow for their input. Also, does the EPA or Amy Corps of Engineers regulate this type of direct pollution in a watershed district. How can city code allow this? So, let me get this straight: Edina city code allows climable fences around pools now and the city code also allows salt water pools to be directly drained on a minuscule parcel of a front lawn directly polluting in a watershed district through the storm water sewer system? Do I understand this correctly? Please let me know. Thanks, LAURA PLAETZER I CELL: 612.940.4804 On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Jeff Brown <jbrownkedinamn.gov> wrote: Mr. Mero, • I I spoke with a representative from Refined this morning. This pipe will only be used when large amounts of water are drained from the pool. The planned poo discharge is as follows: When a large amount of water is drained from the pool (Once per year), a flexible hose will be attached to this permanent tube and water will be discharged onto the front lawn of the property. The drain tile system in the front yard will then accommodate the water from the pool. The intent is to keep the water on the property. According to City code, this is an acceptable way to remove water from a pool, and should occur relatively infrequently. If for some reason the system is not functioning as designed, we will have to evaluate it in the future. Please feel free to contact me with questions or to discuss this situation. Thanks, Jeff Brown, RS, Community Health Administrator 952-826-0466 1 Fax 952-826-0390 ibrown anEdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov 0 z Heather Branigin isFrom: Diane Saunders <dianes2780@charter.net> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 7:57 AM To: Ron Case; Brad Aho; Kathy Nelson; Nancy Tyra -Lukens; Sherry Butch er-Wickstrom; james.brimeyer@metc.state.mn.us; susan.haigh@metc.state.mn.us; Betsy Hodges; Cheryl Youakim; Edina Mail; jan.callison@co.hennepin.mn.us; Jeff Jacobs; Keith Bogut; Linda Higgins; Matt Look; McLaughlin; Scott McBride; Terry Schneider; Will Roach; jeff.rjohnson@co.hennepin.mn.us; Mike Opat; randyjohnson@co.hennepin.mn.us Subject: Southwest Transitway Cuts Dear Eden Prairie City Council Members, the Metropolitan Council Southwest Light Rail Transit Corridor Management Committee, and the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners sitting as the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority: As a former resident of the city of Eden Prairie (2010-2012) and Plymouth (2000-2004), and an ardent supporter of Light Rail Transit (LRT) as one solution out of many possibilities for the Twin Cities Metropolitan area, and a rider of the Blue Line and Green Line on my visits to the cities, I am opposed to the proposed cuts to the line in Eden Prairie, as I see them as an easy way out of doing the hard work of keeping this vital light rail line intact in its entirety. This same process in a way took place with the Northstar Commuter Rail Line, in that those planning and supporting the project did not like the price tag related to a line which was initially designed to serve St. Cloud. Now, what we have is a commuter rail line which is struggling to serve anyone at a bare minimum of service level, rather than the high quality line it could have been. .Developing, constructing and operating a light rail line is not cheap; we all know that. There is no LRT line in the country which has been inexpensive to build and operate. But, when compared to bus service, light rail is by far the best solution to the transit needs of the Twin Cities. The studies which have been performed on this mode of transit clearly demonstrate LRT is the best solution to a complex transit system like that which is being developed in the metro. In a study performed by the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (VTPI), "Rail Transit in America —A Comprehensive Evaluation of Benefits," 4 November 2004, authored by Todd Litman, VTPI found that "... per -capita transit ridership is far higher in rail transit cities...." (page 4) They found that the number of passenger -miles in bus only cities was 118, while rail passenger -miles was 589 in large rail cities and 178 in small rail cities. The development and operations costs of light rail, while initially high, can be amortized out for the life of the line, which is typically over 30 years. So, for the projected cost of this line at approximately $1.97 billion, if one simply divides 1.97 billion by 30 the result is 65.6 million a year. While this may not be an accurate amortization schedule, it shows this cost can be spread out over a long time, making the project more attractive. Further, when one considers the benefits this project will bring to the residents and visitors of the metro, the cost is worth it. Please do the people of the metro a favor, do not cut this project up such that its value will be so diminished it will no longer serve the people of the metro. In doing so, you will give ammunition to the opponents of transit who want all such projects killed. If you ever hope to fulfill the dream of a fully connected light rail system in the 7 -county metro area, you will leave this project intact and not cut the Mitchell Road station. The Mitchell Road station could very well serve in the future as a doorway to Chanhassen and Chaska, and possibly to Shakopee. Think of the future and plan for the future, not the present. Regards, Diane Saunders •31 W 5th St. #1 Duluth MN 55806-2727 (763) 807-8772 Heather Branigin From: Laura Plaetzer <laura@plaetzer.us> • Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 9:13 AM To: Phil Mero Cc: Scott H. Neal; Jeff Brown; Monica Mero; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; ross@employersolutionsgroup.com Subject: Re: Salt water pools Thanks Phil. He was just blowing me off anyway. If they were even remotely concerned they would call themselves. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Phil Mero <phil.mero& mail.com> wrote: Scott - I would hope that Mr. Brown would take a proactive role in this and conduct some research on behalf of concerned citizens. This does not feel like'work' that a resident should have to perform. We have very busy lives. We have been consumed by this project in having to protect our properties and families all the while our jobs, families, lives are being negatively affected. Laura should NOT have to make that call, it is the cities responsibility to SERVE its constituents. If Jeff were a volunteer I'd get it ... it's his job, he needs to do it. • Thank you. Phil Mero On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Scott H. Neal <sneal ,edinamn.gov> wrote: Laura, A call to the watershed district is a good idea. I encourage you to do that. If they have any questions about the facts or details of the project, please refer them to our City Sanitarian Mr. Jeff Brown. Thanks. > On Jun 24, 2015, at 5:05 PM, Laura Plaetzer <laur �plaetzer.us> wrote: > Everything I've read tonight about salt water pool water draining on a > front lawn is strictly prohibited because it is so dangerous for > lawns, vegetation and wild life. We live in the watershed district > which means this water will go directly into our lakes and streams. > •> I'm calling the Minnehaha Watershed District tomorrow for their input. > Also, does the EPA regulate this type of direct pollution in a > watershed district. How can city code allow this? • > So, let me get this straight: edina city code allows climable fences > around pools now and the code also allows salt water pools to be > directly drained on a minuscule parcel of a front lawn directly > polluting in a watershed district? Do I understand this correctly? > Please let me know. > Thanks, > Laura Plaetzer Sincerely - Phil Mero 612.963.0852 is • Heather Branigin _ From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> • Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 8:25 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle; swensonannl@gmail.com; Kevin Staunton Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - A Closer Look at the Safest U.S. City to Drive In http•//www routefifty coni/2015/06lfort-collins-colorado-traffic-safetv/116170/?oref= ov�exec today n1 In. Colorado, Fort Collins used a community approach to address traffic safety issues in neighborhoods. Hundreds of cities throughout the U.S. are a nightmare to navigate. From pedestrians at risk of being struck by a vehicle to car accidents to not -so -bicycle friendly travel, several cities have a lot to learn and fix before they can be deemed a safe city to travel. Then there are gems like Fort Collins, a mid-size college city with a population of around 150,000 in picturesque Colorado. A city that has been chosen several times as the "Best Place to Live" has also been given accolades as "America's Safest Driving City" not just • once, but four times in a ten year period. What is Fort Collins doing right that other cities of the same size and popularity are doing wrong? See a Problem, Mabe a Change Although Fort Collins has made the top of Allstate's annual safe driving list for four years since 2004, it wasn't always the safest city to drive. This Northern Colorado hot spot along the Front Range has seen a huge population boost since the early 199os, and with rapid population growth comes traffic issues such as speeding in residential neighborhoods. The people of Fort Collins saw a problem and moved to keep their growing city's pedestrians, bicyclists and drivers safe. In 1996, with the guidance of then -Mayor Ann Azari, the Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program (NTSP) was created and immediately tried to improve the traffic safety throughout Fort Collins. After assessing what worked and didn't work in other cities, 40 NTSP created a plan of action. In an effort to cut down on speeding the residents of Fort • Collins: • Involved the Community: The NTSP was comprised of representatives from various Fort Collins municipal departments, including fire, transportation, police, neighborhood resources, community planning and environmental services. The group also reached out to residents in the most problematic neighborhoods and asked for feedback and involvement. Educated: Just like the public service announcements we see concerning traffic today, NTSP believed that educating the public was powerful way to get drivers to slow down. According to a report from the mayor's office, a substantial portion of the budget was dedicated to traffic safety education from radio ads to billboards and materials distributed at schools. o Enforced & Engineered: In an effort to slow down traffic throughout 40 neighborhoods specifically, camera radar, speed humps and raised crosswalks were used. While all were and are effective, they may only be temporary or inconsistent without an increase of law enforcement patrolling problematic areas. Fort Collins Today Although the city has improved on speeding issues, even the "Safest City to Drive" has some work to do. Since Fort Collins has asked their residents for feedback and involvement, the residents will tell them what they want. From bicyclists wanting safer intersections to residents still witnessing speeding in their neighborhoods, there are always questions to answer and concerns to address. The Fort Collins transportation department is busy, but busy is good as it indicates an awareness and concern for traffic safety. 0 Heather Branigin June 25, 2015 To: Members of the Edina City Council As a longtime Edina resident who also served on the third Grandview Community Advisory Team, I'd like to provide my input regarding the proposed Grandview Public Works Redevelopment Scenarios. I am very concerned about the density as well as the building heights being considered. I oppose the suggested 10-12 story residential tower or any building of that magnitude on the site. I'm joined by other homeowners in this area when emphasizing that a more suitable building height for this project is three or four stories. This is to avoid both undesirable views and the area permanently under a building shadow, and importantly, traffic density. I believe the proposals being considered put too much development on a 3.3 acre site. While serving on the Grandview Community Advisory Team, we studied results of the community survey of Edina residents, conducted by The Morris Leatherman Company. Apartment buildings were strongly opposed by Edina residents, condominiums somewhat as well. According to The Morris Letterman Company in a presentation to the Community Advisory Team, the reason that the citizens of Edina do not like these types of developments is because of density. The City has done well in requesting input from the citizens of Edina to develop this site. However we're not seeing that input being incorporated. The decision to proceed with a developer before land use was decided, and the resulting plans are not in keeping with how Edina residents indicated they want to see this public land developed. At the April 22 Open House, a Frauenshuh representative stated to my wife that at the prior meeting there was support for tall buildings and density. His statement was misleading since that's all there was to choose from in the three scenarios, and what he didn't mention was that about 130 people in attendance did not select any development scenario because they didn't like any of these dense options. Citizens of Edina do not want tall buildings and density, especially near their residential areas. This is well documented. I have attached for your review a You Tube link of The Morris Leatherman presentation to the Grandview CAT. Minutes 11:37-18:58 and 36:40 - 40:00 cover the findings on apartments, condos and density. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c 159aI9HzA&feature=youtu.be Please listen to the presentation minutes mentioned above and then as our elected representatives, please seriously consider and act on the input from our Edina community. The survey also illuminates what many residents did identify as their preferred use of the civic space such as an updated community center among other options. I support their requests for shared use of public land, and therefore those types of developments. Sincerely, Patrick Olk 952-922-6393 • • From: Patrick Olk <apolk@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 10:42 PM To: Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Pat Olk, Scott H. Neal; Bill Neuendorf Subject: Grandview Public Works Redevelopment June 25, 2015 To: Members of the Edina City Council As a longtime Edina resident who also served on the third Grandview Community Advisory Team, I'd like to provide my input regarding the proposed Grandview Public Works Redevelopment Scenarios. I am very concerned about the density as well as the building heights being considered. I oppose the suggested 10-12 story residential tower or any building of that magnitude on the site. I'm joined by other homeowners in this area when emphasizing that a more suitable building height for this project is three or four stories. This is to avoid both undesirable views and the area permanently under a building shadow, and importantly, traffic density. I believe the proposals being considered put too much development on a 3.3 acre site. While serving on the Grandview Community Advisory Team, we studied results of the community survey of Edina residents, conducted by The Morris Leatherman Company. Apartment buildings were strongly opposed by Edina residents, condominiums somewhat as well. According to The Morris Letterman Company in a presentation to the Community Advisory Team, the reason that the citizens of Edina do not like these types of developments is because of density. The City has done well in requesting input from the citizens of Edina to develop this site. However we're not seeing that input being incorporated. The decision to proceed with a developer before land use was decided, and the resulting plans are not in keeping with how Edina residents indicated they want to see this public land developed. At the April 22 Open House, a Frauenshuh representative stated to my wife that at the prior meeting there was support for tall buildings and density. His statement was misleading since that's all there was to choose from in the three scenarios, and what he didn't mention was that about 130 people in attendance did not select any development scenario because they didn't like any of these dense options. Citizens of Edina do not want tall buildings and density, especially near their residential areas. This is well documented. I have attached for your review a You Tube link of The Morris Leatherman presentation to the Grandview CAT. Minutes 11:37-18:58 and 36:40 - 40:00 cover the findings on apartments, condos and density. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c 159aI9HzA&feature=youtu.be Please listen to the presentation minutes mentioned above and then as our elected representatives, please seriously consider and act on the input from our Edina community. The survey also illuminates what many residents did identify as their preferred use of the civic space such as an updated community center among other options. I support their requests for shared use of public land, and therefore those types of developments. Sincerely, Patrick Olk 952-922-6393 • Heather Branigin • From: Solvei Wilmot Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:30 AM To: 'KEY MANTHE' Cc: Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Lisa Schaefer; Brian Olson Subject: RE: Trash collection Good Day Ms. Manthe: The subject of organized trash collection is an issue the city is reviewing. A survey of the residents of Edina is being prepared and one of the topics is trash collection. The responses to that survey will help the City Council gauge what actions they would take regarding trash collection for the citizens of Edina. Thank you for taking the time to express your interest. Sincerely, ~ Solvei Wilmot, RS, Environmental Health Specialist I/Recycling Coordinator 952-826-0463 1 Fax 952-826-0390 swilmotaEdinaMN.gov i www.EdinaMN.pov Disclaimer: information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Hct, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited, if you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and tier: promptly delete this message from your computer system. •From: Brian Olson Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:06 AM To: 'KEY MANTHE' Cc: Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Lisa Schaefer; Solvei Wilmot Subject: RE: Trash collection Dear Ms. Manthe, Thank you for your concern about preserving the streets in Edina. Solveii Wilmot, who is Cced on this email, may be the best person to address this concern but I have attached the March 2015 Speak Up Edina report that discussed organized garbage collection. Once again, thank you for your interest in the City of Edina and I hope this email finds you well. Sincerely, Brian Brian Olson, Public Works Director � s'F 952-826-0311 I Fax 952-826-0392 bolsonC�EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.pov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: KEY MANTHE [mai Ito: kaymanthe@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 6:35 FM To: Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Lisa Schaefer; Brian Olson Subject: Trash collection June 24, 1014 Dear Sirs and Madam, I am writing to comment on the article in today's Star Tribune. (June 24 -Metro Section --Page B3) titled Bloomington OKs plan to organize trash collection. I wish I had read "Edina oks plan.................to organize trash collection. " I live on St. Patrick's Lane. Our street was repaved two summers ago. There are ten residential trash pick-ups each week. Most of these ten residents have different haulers picking up trash, recycling and yard waste. A few have smaller trucks. Some haulers use huge vehicles. All of the data in the Bloomington article could be repeated for us, the opposition, the savings, etc. But most importantly, the wear and tear of the street itself from all of these trucks on a street too small to turn around on without some back and forth juggling. Please give some time and consideration to this issue which would add to the preservation of our streets and saving tax -payers money for assessments for street repairs. 0 Thank you. • Kay Manthe 0 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: July 7, 2015 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • • 9 - kelo� Ash V UZ> tUA 'S VC, -t- S� AV 9W 11 Real Possibilities June 29, 2015 Mayor James Hovland 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55434 Dear Jim, On behalf of the AARP Board of Directors and my Executive Team, I want to thank you for serving as a panelist for our overview and discussion of AARP's Life Reimagined during our recent retreat in Minneapolis. • Your vision of creating a model city where the citizens continue to learn and thrive at any age is exactly what AARP is hoping can be replicated across the United States. Your commitment to and trust in AARP is deeply appreciated. Our Life Reimagined team is happy to be partnering with you to help deliver your message on healthy and active living to your city and beyond. Keep up the great work and I look forward to hearing about your ongoing successes. Sincerely, J Ann Jenki • 601 E Street, NW I Washington, DC 20049 202-434-22771 1 -888 -OUR -AARP 1 1-888-687-22771 TTY: 1-877-434-7598 www.aarp.org I twitter: @aarp facebook.com/aarp I youtube.com/aarp • � �p,RARtpry` Cntr of Graxr �itt�xt%�, rxi�tl� OFFICE OF THE MAYOR GEORGE K. HEARTWELL MAYOR July 1, 2015 The Honorable James Hovland Mayor of the City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: If you're like me, you probably don't have much time to talk to other mayors about their successes and challenges, or to share yours. You likely don't have a lot of time to travel to see the innovative things other cities are doing. You might not have the time, or the staff, to research ispolicy ideas and best practices. If this sounds familiar, then I have the solution for you: the Mayors Innovation Project Summer Meeting, August 13 throughl5 in Des Moines, IA. • The Mayors Innovation Project is a learning network among mayors interested in shared prosperity, environmental sustainability, democratic governance and public accountability. I serve on the project's National Steering Committee, because 1 find it to be an excellent way to connect with other mayors, share good ideas and learn about what's happening in other cities. The discussions and presentations are extremely relevant to the issues many communities are facing today. I always come back with at least two or three new ideas. I have also found MIP to be an effective policy group. I recall our meeting in 2014 in Washington DC when, after engaging us in a spirited discussion and hearing both our frustration and our good ideas, the EPA regulator responsible for formulating the storm water rule, on the spot, invited us to assemble a team to work with her staff on its formulation. The meetings offer good information, new ideas, and a comfortable place to discuss them with your peers. I promise you'll return home with at least one or two new ideas you can implement immediately to improve life in your city. At the meeting, you will talk about the work Des Moines (and other cities) have done on Creating Effective Housing Plans, Community Policing, Measuring Sustainability, and more. 300 MONROE AVENUE, N.W. • GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN 49503 • (616) 456.3168 • FAX (616) 456-3111 • gheartwe®ci.grand-rapids.mi.us July 1, 2015 Page 2 Mayor's Innovative Project In each case, we'll hear from experts in the field and cities working on the issue. The Mayors Innovation Project focuses on making the experience accessible to you — from keeping costs down to providing a comprehensive briefing book to allowing plenty of time for informal interaction. I know you'll find it worth your time. You can register online at www.mayorsimovation.org. If your schedule won't allow you to attend, please c nsider sending one of your senior staff in your place. Please contact their staff at 608-262-5387 r info@mayorsinnovation.org for more information. 9 K. • • 0 • Airlines forAmerica" We I-onric:Gt tl ir� Wof I{ The Honorable James B. Hovland Office of the Mayor The City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 June 30, 2015 Dear Mayor Hovland, Airlines for America is the oldest and largest trade organization of the principal passenger and cargo airlines in the United States. Our members include Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Atlas Air, Delta, FedEx, Hawaiian Airlines, jetBlue Airways, Southwest, United, UPS, US Airways. Air Canada is an • associate member. Although you did not have the opportunity to vote on the proposed tax increase (Resolution 101) that was tabled during the 83fd Annual US Conference of Mayors Transportation and Communications Committee Meeting, we thank you for your consideration of the industry's views and appreciate your recognition of the value the airline industry brings to all of our communities. Airline passengers are already over -taxed. On an average $300 domestic roundtrip ticket, airline passengers are already subjected to a 21 % federal tax burden, a higher percentage than so-called "sin taxes", which are allegedly designed to discourage people from using those products. • We look forward to working with you on this and other issues. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly if I can be of any assistance in the future. Sinc Siea Vice President, State and Local Government Affairs 1301 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20004-1707 T: 202.626.4000 E: a4a@airlines.org W: airlines.org HAMLINE UNIVERSITY School of Business June 29, 2015 The Honorable James Hovland Mayor of Edina 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424-1330 Dear Mayor Hovland In recognition of Jim Miller's years of dedicated service and retirement from the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), the Hamline School of Business is establishing a scholarship in his hor,.a.- _*n support Public Administration students at Hamline University. As James F. Miller Steering Committee members and past and present mayors, we are reaching out to ask for your help with this fundraising effort The purpose of this scholarship is threefold: 1, to provide tuition assistance to students in the online MPA program at Hairline; 2. to recognize Jim for his contributions to effective city governing through the LMC; and 3. to honor the impact Jim had on his students at Hamline through his teaching, serving on dissertation and thesis committees, and helping with the redesign of the doctoral degree. Funding will provide the recipient partial tuition support for two years while pursuing his or her degree as long as academic progress is demonstrated. Hamline's online MPA model is designed to be interactive and engaging with weekend residencies, providing students a quality education and life-long network. Hamline developed the online program to serve the education needs of public servants throughout Minnesota. The scholarship will help public administrators across the state bring best practices to their communities. As such, this scholarship is a fitting reflection of Jim Miller's legacy of helping cities across Minnesota flourish. In the LMC tradition of developing leadership, the goal is to encourage the next generation of public officials and administrators to pursue and continue careers in public service. We invite you to help make this recognition possible through one time or multi-year gifts and pledges. You and/or your organization or city will be recognized as a champion, lead or supporting donor. Enclosed is a scholarship summary as well as an ongoing pledge and payment form. For questions, please contact the Hamline School of Business at 651-523-2284 or hsb-dean@hamline.edu. Best regards, Karen J. kndcrson 4kl�l Jun Scheibel Ardell F. Brede 0 • Hamline School of Business • MS-Ai74o,1536 Hewitt Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55104-1284 p:651-523-2284 f: 651-5233o98 hsb@hamline.edu www.hamline.edu/hsb Heather Branigin • From: Fiona <summit.c@apceovip.org> Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 9:14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: To James B. Hovland:VIP Invitation from China Attachments: Basic Agenda-GELS2015.docx; Registration Form-GELS2015.docx Dear James B. Hovland, On behalf of Jilin Provincial Government of China and Asia-Pacific CEO Association, we are honored to extend to you our cordial invitation to the 4°i Global Economic Leaders Summit (GELS 2015). Dates: August 30th to September 1", 2015 Venue: Shangri-La Hotel, Changchun city, Jilin Province, China. Theme: Global Technological Innovation & Cooperation, World Economic Restructuring & Upgrading. Meanwhile, the guests of GELS 2015 could participate as VIPs to the 10th China -Northeast Asia Expo, which is held from August 31" to September 6th, 2015 in Changchun city, Jilin Province. Jilin Province, the economic center of Northeast China, sincerely welcomes you and looks forward to your attendance. Sincerely yours, Jiang Chaoliang Governor of Jilin Province of China • Former Chairman of Agricultural Bank of China Zheng Xiongwei Global Executive Chairman of APCEO ----------------------------------------------------------- ATTACHMENTS: 1. Profile (Please click to view/download this bigfile.) ale.) 2. Basic Agenda 3. Registration Form * The formal Invitation Letter together with the Confirmation Letter will be sent after registration and the confirmation of the Organizing Committee. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > VIP TREATMENTS - Free Registration & participation, 5 star hotel and accommodation(Aug.301h - Sept. 151, 3 nights, 2015) will be offered to VIP guests - Free Speech & display opportunities (need to apply in advance for approval) - Meeting with Chinese government leaders after the approval of the Organizing Committee - Attend the 10'h China -Northeast Asia Expo as VIP - Media Interview (need to apply in advance for approval) - Free airport pick-up/see-off > MAIN PARTICIPANTS - High-level executives from Fortune 500 & Forbes 2000 companies - Industrial leaders from the following industries: Emerging Industries, Modern Service Industry, Eco -industry, Culture Industry, Science and Technology Invention and Innovation Industry •- Government officials from central government of China and relevant provincial/municipal governments - High-level executives from China 500 companies - Heads of state and relevant government officials from the overseas of China - Renowned economists, experts and scholars - Chiefs from famous international organizations and industry associations - Investors and bankers > REGISTRATION PROCESS For registration, please send the completed Registration Form with personal photo (more than 300 pixels in JPEG) by email to us. The formal Invitation Letter together with the Confirmation Letter will be sent to you soon after the confirmation of the Organizing Committee. > CONTACT Ms. Fiona Qi Assistant of Chairman of China, APCEO Tel: +86-10-64987220 Fax: +86-10-64963611 Email: summit a,apceo.com Website: http:// eg ls.apeeo.com Address: A 1-10 floor, Sunshine Plaza, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China 0 U Heather Branigin From: David Fisher Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 8:50 AM To: 'rob@capstonelawmn.com' Cc: calvinjohnsonii3@gmail.com; melaniejohnson@comcast.net; tony@tchomebuildersinc.com; Daniel Schleck; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: RE: Picture Clearly demonstrating trespass on my client's property at 4220 Alden Drive in Edina Attachments: Fondation As -Built Survey 4222 Alden Dr 0702824410094_06012012.pdf; Foundation As -built Survey 4220 Alden Dr 0702824410093-05082015.pdf Please find enclosed a copy of the as build foundation surveys for 4222 and 4220 Alden Dr. This should help to define where the property line is between the two properties. The foundation to the property line for 4222 Alden Dr. = 6.7 Feet The foundation to the property line for 4220 Alden Dr. = 9.74 Feet David Fisher, Chief Building Official X a 952-826-0450 1 Fax 952-826-0389 cf DFisher@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov '' .. ...For Living, Leanitng, Raising Families & Doing Business Tell us how we're doing! Take our customer satisfaction survey. •From: rob@capstonelawmn.com [mailto:rob@capstonelawmn.com] Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 10:05 AM To: David Fisher Cc: calvinjohnsonii3@gmail.com; melanie_johnson@comcast.net; tony@tchomebuildersinc.com; Daniel Schleck; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: RE: Picture Clearly demonstrating trespass on my client's property at 4220 Alden Drive in Edina Mr. Fisher, Mr. Schleck's renewed argu rents that '1'C [lom.ebuilders is trespassing on the neighboring property are again demonstrably incorrect. Mr. Schleck is now assuming that the equipment in the photo is trespassing based on an email from his client stating that the distance between the property line and the house Lander construction is 7 feet, whereas the equipment in the photograph has a width of 8 feet, C inches. .1 don't know where this 7 foot number comes from. Mr. Schleck's client claims that they are from a building plan. Obviously, a building plan is not a stuvey. I submitted to you a survey yesterday. The survey shows the distance between the house and the property line is 9.75 feel, not 7 feet as Mr. Schleck's client clahns. Therefore, asstunning for the sake of argument that Mr. Schleck's client's specs concerning the width of the equipment are correct, the equipment would have to be at least another foot wider before it would even touch the neighboring property line. Additionally, as evidenced by the photo Mr. Schleck submitted, the equipment is entirely within the area to the north of the shoring wall. where construction has been ongoing for months, and where Mr. Schleck's clients • have consented to construction activity for months. What has suddenly changed? As you know, I am working with my client to resolve any legitimate concerns that Mr. Schleck's clients have. Mr. Schleck's clients had agreed to allow access on their property for the purpose of shoring and inexplicably • revoked that access last week. We intend to present Mr. Schleck with a plan for back -filling and completing the retaining wall and restoring his clients' yard. In order to facilitate this resolution,.[ have left Mr. Schleck several messages and have asked him to call me back. He has refused to return my calls, and apparently prefers sending emails to the city and to my client's clients making accusations that simply lack factual support. Facts matter, and if the City wishes to give any consideration to Mr. Schleck's expressed concerns, then. it should require that he produce, at minimum, a survey reflecting current conditions showing the relationship between the alleged trespass and his clients' property line. Where I have provided a survey that clearly disputes the information being provided by Mr. Schleck arid his clients and whereas Mr. Schleck has offered nothing but unsupported allegations, it would be entirely inappropriate for the city to take action against my client, as has been repeatedly urged by Mr. Schleck. Similarly, Mr. Schleck's accusation of selective enforcement and preferential treatment are misplaced. Mr. Schleck has simply made accusations without providing the city with any real evidence to support his concerns. 'The city cannot take action. against a reputable builder in the middle of finishing a home based on conjecture and unsupported allegations. .I hope you enjoy your holiday weekend. I also hope that Mh Schleck decides to return any one of my phone messages when he returns to the office next week.. Rob Sh iiness Atttorney W— L;€: w Capstone LaNN--, Canadrillr Pacific Plaza 1.20 Dior€th. Sixth StMet Suite t,?0 Mi�nne�r.l3ul.is, M1� ;��.t32 1 . 9552-314-961.6 incl. iris on Facebook www.capstonelaw.com This is a transmission from the taw firm of Capstone Law. LLC, and may contain information which is privileged. confidential and protected by the attorney-client or attorney work- product privileges. if you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error; please destroy it and delete it from your terminal and notify me immediately.. CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Any advice contained in this email (including any attachments Unless expressly stated otherwise) is not intended or written to be Used, and cannot be used; for purposes of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer. • From: Daniel Schleck[mailto:DSchleck@hallelandhabicht.com] Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 7:45 AM To: David Fisher; ihovland@Edinamn.gov; kstaunton@edinamn.gov: rstewart@edinamn.gov • Cc: rob@capstonelawmn.com; calvinjohnsonii3@gmail.cwm; melanie j_ohnson@comcast.net Subject: Picture Clearly demonstrating trespass on my client's property at 4220 Alden Drive in Edina Dear Dave — Please see the attached photo which was taken down the property line yesterday clearly demonstrating TC Homebuilders and the Johnsons' continued trespassing onto my client's property yesterday. Also, seethe explanation from my client below demonstrating mathematically how it is impossible for them not to trespass onto our property, They have to trespass to get that machine to the back of the lot. There is no access agreement between the two homeowners. Why won't the City help these people? As I have mentioned in my previous emails, TC Homebuilders is violating city ordinances, trespassing and causing damage to my client's property. The City of Edina must enforce its code! Please explain why this Builder somehow has a special historical relationship with the City that gives them protection from such enforcement. If the City refuses to enforce its own ordinances in a fair and impartial manner we will have no choice but to protect our rights by seeking equitable relief against the property owners AND AGAINST THE CITY FOR SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT! Feel free to forward this email to Roger Knutson the City Attorney. The builder is clearly rushing to keep trespassing so they won't be delayed. Please email me back as soon as possible to let me know the schedule and scope of the City's activities here. - �- HALLELAN D HAD I C HT I:)aniel. Schleck Hallelaud l-labicht PA •dschleck(cr�hallelandhabicht.com 612-836-5531 Download Dan's Vcatto From: andrew.zumbuschC&cimail.com[mailto:andrew.zumbusch@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 4:06 PM To: Daniel Schleck Cc: Jennie gmail Subject: Re: Concern about damages I believe this picture may be the best argument for trespassing. According to the plans they submitted the city there is 7 feet better the foundation of their house and the edge of the property line. According to the manufacture, the Terex TH844C has a wheel base of 8 feet six inches. Even is the wheels were touching the house, which they are not, they would still be trespassing on our property. Even with the original agreement it states that no equipment will enter our property. From: dschleck@hallelandhabicht.com Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 1:44 PM To: andrew.zumbusch@gmail.com Cc: Jennie email 0 Yes, I would contact Dave Fisher or any other building official. He has asked me to make a data practices request regarding the report made by the builder for retaining wall, I will put in the request for the survey as well. This will take time. • Andy if you had time you could down to City Hall and see if they would give you a copy on the spot? HALLELAND HABICHT Daniel Schleck Halleland. Habicht PA dschleck@hallelandhabicht.com 612-836-55-3) 1 Download Dan's WARD From: andrew.zumbusch@gmail.com[ma ilto:and rew.zumbusch(?i)gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 11:55 AM To: Daniel Schleck Cc: Jennie gmail Subject: Re: Concern about damages I just got off the phone with one of the surveyors. It appears that all of them are booked at least two weeks out which might be to late. He said a good option would be to get the survey that was done for the house from the city. This way I would show they are over the line with the survey they had done with a tape measure and it would be their own documentation proving them in the wrong. Do you know who I would contact to get the original survey? Would it be Dave Fisher? • From: dschleck@hallelandhabicht.com Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 11:36 AM To: andrew.zumbusch@gmail.com Cc: Jennie email Perfect, send her the picture of the gap also. Call me on cell this weekend if you need me. Our office is closed Tomorrow and Monday, but call if you need meat 612-730-4808 HALLELAND HABICHT Daniel. Schleck Halleland I 1abicht PA dschleck2chall el and habicht. com 612-8-36-553) 1 Download Dan's VcAt?v From: andrew.zumbusch@gmail.com lmailto:andrew.zumbusch(@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:43 AM To: louise.krug.iqok@statefarm.com • Cc: Daniel Schleck; Jennie gmail Subject: Concern about damages 4 Louise, • Currently there is new construction taking place next door to us. During the construction process they have damaged our side yard, and potentially our foundation. We are not filling a clam for anything right now, but I wanted to make you aware of the situation in case we need to in the future. A have attached some picture to show some of the damage. Andrew Zumbusch 4222 Alden Dr. Edina, MN 55416 $A Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Think Green! PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE -This message and any attachments are intended for the named recipient(s) only and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive for the recipient, you are notified that dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by calling (612) 836-5500 or replying to this e-mail. Please delete the message and any attachments. • 0 The Gregory Group _._...�_.-_._:_..._....... .. ...,,__.. - . �r.. ^.fir..:, _. .%�.` 1_-.. ?_:::._. INVOICE NO. 80217 d.b.a. foundationS`urveyFor: F.B,No• copy-cert LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC' i� C�� REFINED LLC SCALE: 1" 20- Established in 1962 + t} { t'DI ; •LAND SURVEYORSs r; t =Property located ie Section O Denoiaa Iron tAo a eni RFGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF tv11NNffTA ` { rowanhi 28, Ra au24. O Denotm wood Nub set for 760173rd Avermu Noah (763)5603119] D..tax ood 1.1macepolis. Minnesota 55428 F.X No. 56n",2, my Properly Address: 4222 Alden Drive aOLi7.O Denotes Existing Elevation �zrlir arz (�.PrxifiratI, Edina,hlinnescita Basis for 7 � + DOC1.0 Denotes Prapasetl Eiovalion No. 4220 Benchmark: Top Nut Hydrant on the west side of beaflogs is -t Denotes Surface Drainage O:erra.n tarns r•arh n tests Alden Drive opposite housc no. 4220 asswned xw Li. 9!'.0.2 Elevation = 886.49 feet 1 NOTE Proposed posed Euilduy inlo�maawtitmus ole cne�cke0 win, f'swri Nathollrr", xrk ...-.._...._.__.. �..�_ .___...__..._........ a ore h pproved oWirbrig plan arM devebpment «9reding a4:rnv^ast >� 92'.B -y.. B5.9•--- ►•i X. plan bel ezcavalion and c«ntrudlon l - - -I Proposed grades shown on this survey are - - _ - - - - - -_ - - 1 % 8.99.5 .� �� •� - - _ _ _ - - - ! ^. - - - - - ..._ interpoialtons of BranNsse contours from ans. H t-,-d V.1rG+�-�� i( I/-^'rw,,,d 897.?. dralnaga•gwdin 7vr \ .•a•_.« z •a-f�X"`e J Top r fera-e + 5. !t a A�rn... NOTE: The reiatwnahip between proposed floor m� !� _9 - J` / !tip -"P _ I.ai O.S. !m •h.'� elevations to be veri0ed by bud0er. {^-'„._._.. f i Ji'xorrp ✓:mc B9 :r �;,�. , P.— ��= J ;� — * ! ✓ t S 89'59'41” E 199.50 .=01-qt ^'y \" r l � it---�� aov; / ll 11 as t —F...------- ._.._.._._......82.4 O z iv •+ Nj4. $ :'c, 3 I 4�„ C. ! ' + As-BuiltF.Jevationsr+ i �,• armead lHreY .'go„ /�,, r :+�"< j Top of Block 901.7 r� Iron Only O Lowest Floor_893.0t (not pourP-d) Only w � . Lowest Footing 892.7 v :va:.; �.:r.•• Z I I9VII,r / N v 5;y, rots o! wage. Q P 'Nae � 90G,G5 j }IYgad Parm I •• �, 35No•i + ir< N 89°59'42" W 199.63 �0;1 . " o 011 - �Z PIN °a j /, /. a , c-, <rs 200.00 plat .;i "cr+.r �t }f / a-.. • L..r. - .: '.9J(.'•I' do :,072.7r" woofd . i % /96501 c�,..e�`�f='n's .3 _ , n No. 42?_4 I N w The only easements shown ere from pints of record or information W j • • +: provided by client. i certify that This plan, sperificatlon, or report was prepared by me or 'Ne under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed land Surveyor under the laws of ale State of Minnesota 5cacs I- /It 59-fir /fP•x I Surve ed;(his 30th yy of May 2012. Legal Description From Tax RecordsThe North 62 feet ofthe the South 82 feet signed Fslil��ttdfa t.aprtt;r r, of Lot 59, MOKN1NGStDE Gregory s .Minn. ftp. No.24992 Hennepin County, Minnesota JUN j �a�l" fte,r Drawn By :7. �ln,t.on File Name i.vi t�v lit' �i —" m59-ms9021710endaron.dwg R. 517E ADDRESS: EDNA, MND 5416 TOP OF POURED WALL AS -BUILT FOR: TC HOMEBUILDERS M # TDP or POURED w&L sC0.3 VAY O8. 2015. PRCPOSm TOP P no Mm. (900,.1) w uee,.erwa •6vWi'aK�� G -ix ___________ 4 11 19 §7 MEAS. 7-7- T '� � frMaG r1w5] iLaOR.NCr3 - ew.• 5nl r/ wt wa "`x +rmvmca tvusr �rT ,.0 - m • 'IF I R x✓ pw]xR 1 w ,w< ne wnvr wuo clue - <.o.r. w.e..-�n - i<�oot __________ nroroo(p woof MUw . m]< L` �' � i SCwLE: T 1NCN - 10 FEES Inamd ox, `.. x lm liwi. i.N . 0 �m Rasaarw .www+ awcvo. ---------------- ------ -.fit; •.' STORM SEWER RR.ET i Pao+ecnEK rnr uL. I .mo...cw ORTLN arsRrs Ew+osec it I'0 lw .ac wea,• ta.-a•.. LOriST'wKR111 j smlreUrt. yYw winQ: JD- 14 Pws f1,20— =-{ f elf i�L-� i [;'��'-� tri'''•.,,.. hoax , ,.f R CGS Mf3�J - � <nmv bmG. r, xi xf w< .w. -.1 R< v Fw it's. .9 REO W. mra. nia SCwLE: T 1NCN - 10 FEES Inamd ox, `.. x lm liwi. i.N . 0 �m Rasaarw .www+ awcvo. wwwewri wr:cwnww: �. RDow+� � PMOR 10 .LYf CONSIRV.51tOI UIS'— i� sv.urkl cmr. r w <!.w h vwe ,kn Or. STORM SEWER RR.ET i Pao+ecnEK rnr uL. I X. BROWN LAND SURVEYING. INC. ORTLN arsRrs Ew+osec it I'0 wm0 [wwr far Row LOriST'wKR111 j smlreUrt. yYw winQ: JD- 14 f1,20— =-{ f elf i�L-� i [;'��'-� tri'''•.,,.. • Heather Branigin From: Ashford, Shelisa - SLAshford <slashford@aarp.org> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 9:59 AM Subject: Join Life Reimagined for a Special PBS Event Attachments: LR -25367 -LR -PBS Event-Invite_f.r4.pdf Importance: High Good Morning, We haven't heard from you, but we're hoping you can join us! Be a part of the live studio audience for the taping of Richard Leider's'Living with Purpose' presentation, then join us afterward for a VIP reception on Wednesday, July 8 at the History Theatre. Please RSVP today to guarantee your seat! Thank you, Shelisa Life v .ed • Real Possibilities 0 DNATIONAL PRODUCTIONS YOU ARE INVITED to Attend a PBS Speciat Taping of "Living with Purpose" featurl,na, Richard Leider Wednesday, July 8, 2015.6:30 p.m. The History Theatre 30 East 10th Street - St. Paul, MN 55101 e Join us for an evening of inspiration, wisdom and passionate storytelling. As a part of the select studio audience, you'll get a sneak peak at the filming of the upcoming national PBS special featuring Richard Leider bestselling author of The Power of Purpose, Repacking Your Bags, and Life Reimagined. Following the taping, we invite you to attend an exclusive VIP reception with Richard Leider himself. Support fot L.ife Remaghnx-d ir, prcmded bY UffltedHealthcaW 'N OPTUM RSVP to Shelisa Ashford by July 2nd at slashford(daarp.org or (202) 434-2243. Parking only at 7A Murictpal Ramp at 13 West Exchange Street, St. Paul, MIN 55102 will be reimbursed. miztarol tm This rarnp is connected by skyway to the History Theatre. Request parking voucher at the theatre prior to the performance. www.historytheatre.com Living with Purpose featuring Ricliwd Leider (w.t.) is a production of Twill Cities Puhlic Television (TPT), and is made possible in part by SUPPOTt from PBS. 0 0 Heather Branigin • From: Kauffman Foundation <opticast@kauffman.org> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 10:32 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Invitation to 2015 Mayors Conference on Entrepreneurship The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, in partnership with Mayor Richard Berry of Albuquerque, NM, would like to invite you to The 2015 Mayors Conference on Entrepreneurship: Recipes for Growth • October 6-8, 2015 Hyatt Regency Albuquerque 330 Tijeras Avenue NW Albuquerque, New Mexico All entrepreneurs start and operate in a specific community, which means city policies and the local ecosystem matter greatly. The Kauffman Foundation's third annual Mayors Conference on Entrepreneurship: Recipes for Growth will explore what local factors truly foster entrepreneurial activity. Universities, federal research laboratories, industry-leading firms, startup capital, the built environment, and philanthropy often are considered necessary ingredients for generating innovation and entrepreneurship. Do these ingredients yield new and growing firms in cities? How can these ingredients mix together :o create a successful recipe for entrepreneurial growth? Please join the Kauffman Foundation, fellow mayors, and leading policy experts October 6-8, 2015, in Albuquerque, New Mexico, to answer these and other questions about the role of cities and mayors in creating vibrant and innovative entrepreneurial economies. _View the draft agenda here. 40 The Kauffman Foundation will cover travel expenses, including airfare, hotel, meals, • and ground transportation while in Albuquerque. Travel guidelines will be forthcoming. Register to Attend This is an invitation -only event. To create the best environment for learning, attendance i�; limited to 90. We expect to fill up quickly. Please register by Wednesday, September 9, 2015. For more information and to view a video from the 20-14 event, visit www.kauffman.org/mayorsconference20l5. For questions, contact Mette Kramer at mkramer(o)kauffman. org or 816-932-1174. Follow the conversation on Twitter, #mayorsconf. (wing Marion Foundation We respect your right to privacy - view our policy • I; you would like to update your profile Of tlr7SLbScribe, plE;asc vise the profle center. >?'�t� Kau�fin3n Fcinxtet.icn. Ali nc�hts re5erursd. ; � 16i 93- - ":GnO .. 4801 Ro.1hill Road, Kansas City. M() 641 1 0 • 2 • Heather Branigin From: Margo O'Dell <modell@me.com> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 12:00 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Can you help? Hi Jim - Any assistance or guidance you can provide is appreciated. Below is my -communication with Shawn Anderson from Public Works. I also left a voice message for him last week but we still haven't connected. We would like to fix this problem, once and for all. Thanks very much! Margo O'Dell 612-239-9004 Begin forwarded message: From: Margo O'Dell <modell _me.com> Subject: Fwd: 3613 55th St •Date: June 22, 2015 7:48:51 AM CDT To: Shawn Anderson <SGAndersonCcDEdinaMN.gov> Cc: Sharon Allison <SAllison(a�EdinaMN.gov> Bcc: Randall Preuss <randy(_)gibbco.com>, Nick Preuss <nickpreuss(a.yahoo.com> Good Morning Shawn, Thank you very much for sending Trevor and Anthony to work on my problem. Unfortunately, the recent rains have shown that the humps they created at the driveway and sidewalk need to be taller to keep the rain from pouring in at both locations. This mornings downpour has water backed up almost to my front steps and the "river" through the driveway continues to erode a portion of the back yard shown in the photos I sent to you. Speaking of the back yard - can you also send someone to fix it? It requires dirt to replace what has washed away and sod or seed for the area, which is shady. Thanks again for your attention to this matter. We are very appreciative to have what has been a persistent and damaging problem to be fixed. Margo O'Dell 612-239-9004 0 Begin forwarded message: From: Margo O'Dell < mode il ,me.corn> • Subject: Re: 3613 55th St Date: June 18, 2015 7:47:05 AM CDT To: Shawn Anderson <SGAnderson(a)-EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Sharon Allison <SAllisonCa--)EdinaMN.gov> Bcc: Randall Preuss <randy -gibbco.com>, Nick Preuss <nickpreussRVahoo.com> Hello Shawn, Can we meet tomorrow afternoon so you can look at my property? Attached are a few pictures taken after yesterday's rain. As you can see, the water from France Avenue down 55th Street into my driveway has caused costly damage to my back yard. It's like having a river flow through my driveway into the back yard. Initially, we tried to control it with stones, but as you can see, the amount and force of the water has been too much. (Water always flows into my front walk, also). I am desperate for a solution to this ongoing problem. Thank you very much, Margo O'Dell 612-239-9004 • 0 • On Jun 17, 2015, at 11:14 AM, Sharon Allison wrote: Shawn — Margo O'dell, 612-239-9004, said water runs from the street onto her driveway and w�Illkway and her neighbor at 3609 said he had the same issue and we build a speed bump -like curb to redirect the water. She is wondering if you can do the same for her. I checked with Ross and he suggested forwarding this to you. 4j Thanks, x� Sharon Allison, Engineering Specialist <ima e002. n > 952-826-0449 1 Fax 952-826-0392 g p g SAllison(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business, . 9 Heather Branigin From: Bildsten Roger <rogerbildsten@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 3:55 PM To: James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Road Reconstruction I am writing to express disappointment with the City of Edina's handling of the installation of a power box on 51 st Street between Arden and Juanita Avenues. The box was installed last week without advance consultation. It is highly visible from Arden Avenue, Juanita Avenue, and 51 st Street (photo attached). The box is 5' tall (apparently so that Xcel's meter reader doesn't have to bend over to see it) on top of a concrete slab. It is an industrial eyesore in the middle of a residential street with considerable pedestrian traffic going to and from the 50th & France area. We have lived at 5100 Juanita Avenue for over 30 years. With a little effort and collaboration this box could have been placed more discreetly to the benefit of all concerned, even on our property. Why couldn't the city have communicated with us in advance and involved us? Wise urban planning should be a component of Edina's Living Streets plan. Communication with residents about important changes should be a part of good governing. I believe that Edina's handling of this power box reflects poorly on city government and should be remedied. Sincerely, Roger Bildsten Roger Bildsten roy?erbildstenQgmail. com +1612 308 9900 0 0 • • Heather Branigin From: Donna Romanow <jmrdkr@me.com> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 11:20 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Grandview project I respectfully request that the council reconsider the direction you are going in with this project and instead support a recreation/fitness based community center, a true community center for all at Grandview. Sincerely, Donna romanow 5416 Stauder circle Edina • • Heather Branigin From: Hagemo, Brenda M <brenda-hagemo@optum.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 11:11 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Community Center - Fitness -recreation Please support a recreation/fitness based community center, a true community center for all at Grandview. We are certainly behind all of the suburbs in not supporting this. Thank You, Brenda Hagemo 4921 Ridge Rd. Edina, MN 55436 Brenda Hagemo ( Optum Technology Storage Capacity Management & Optimization Team 6150 Trenton Lane N, Plymouth, MN 55442, USA F 4-1 763-744-3158 brenda hagemo(a)optum.com www.optum.com P"`TU s� Our United Culture The way forward a Integrity s Compassion v Relationships ■ Innovation a Performance This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended, recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. • • 0 Heather Branigin •From: Jennifer Janovy <jjanovy@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:13 PM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast); James Hovland; Bob Stewart; ann swenson Swenson; Kevin Staunton Cc: Edina Mail; Cary Teague Subject: please reconsider affordable housing policy Dear city council members: It is possible to support affordable housing without offering density bonuses and TIF assistance. This policy if adopted will facilitate exactly the kind of developments that many Edina residents oppose. The policy will also do little to address the ongoing need for affordably priced housing. Let's say that over the next five years, 212 units of affordable housing are added and that developers are required to keep those units affordable for 15. What happens to the people needing affordable housing when their units covert to market rate? This policy, with its emphasis on supporting projects that include only 20% affordable units, simply isn't sustainable. If 212 affordable units represent 20% of overall units, then 1,060 new units will need to be added. This would be on top of the >1,000 units recently completed on in process. Edina is projected to add 5,400 new residents by 2040. If you take the 1,060 new units that would be supported by this policy, add the >1,000 units recently completed or in process, and assume just two people per unit, Edina will add 4,200 •new residents by 2020. That's almost 80% of the total population increase expected by 2040. If in 15-20 years, the city needs to add affordable units (at 20% per development) to replace the affordable units that cease being affordable, Edina's population before 2040 will exceed the 2040 projection. As public costs increase along with population, what are your plans? Remember, if TIF districts are created, the incremental taxes will not be available to fund essential public services for up to 26 years (long after some the units supported by TIF have ceased to be affordable). The proposed policy treats affordable housing as a concession. The developer will concede 20% affordable units for a limited time period. The city will concede density bonuses and incremental taxes. This same concession will be forced on other taxing authorities, such as school districts and the county, through TIF. It is possible to craft an affordable housing policy that focuses on longterm affordability and single family homes (which so many people who are in need for affordably priced housing would greatly prefer). Two other thoughts: The policy references Edina Housing Foundation. Although the city council appoints the Foundation's board of directors, the Foundation is a separate entity. The statement: "The Edina Housing Foundation will consider providing financial assistance to new housing projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing" belongs in a Housing Foundation policy rather than city council policy. The policy supports using TIF funds to support housing projects that include affordable units. The Edina HRA is, as a rule, he TIF authority. Although city council members have assumed positions as HRA commissioners, the HRA is a legally eparate entity. How TIF funds are spent is an HRA decision. The statement: "The City will consider Tax Increment Financing for projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing" demonstrates the blurry line that exists between the Edina city council and Edina HRA. In the end, who will this policy will really benefit? I don't believe the primary benefit will go to those who need more affordably -priced housing. That's a shame. If you truly support affordable housing, please take a step back and give this further thought. Thank you. Jennifer Janovy • Heather Branigin 0- ro m: Sent: To: Subject: Dear City Council Members: Steve & Jennifer Halgren <halgren.edina@gmail.com> Tuesday, July 07, 2015 12:31 PM Edina Mail Grandview development I am so envious of friends in Chaska, Minnetonka, and Chicago's north shore suburbs who work out at their neighborhood fitness centers. Sometimes they meet neighborhood friends there and then go for a frou-frou coffee or Kale salad afterwards. And then the older citizens who go to these neighborhood fitness centers get to mingle with neighbors of different ages! (It's a few years away for me considering I'm 51, but the one and only thing that turns me off about senior housing is that I would like to be around people of different ages when I'm old - not just seniors, my visiting relatives, and the younger people I might see in the periphery but not really interact with.) I take drawing at the Edina Art Center. I am so thankful for that. I love theater and music and patronize the Orpheum, State, Guthrie, and Jungle theaters as well as other venues including EPAC. (Did you know Minneapolis has more theater seats per capita than any other metropolitan city in the United States?) I am so thankful for that. I just really wish we had a neighborhood recreation and fitness center. It feels like a gaping hole. 0Sincerely, Jennifer N. Halgren 6200 South Knoll Drive Edina 0 • w • ,1 �URPORPKF9 • REPORT RECOMMENDATION o e 47,7�� tl� 0 1888 To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: V. G. From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Date: April 22, 2013 Information M Subject: March "Speak Up, Edina" Report Action Requested: Receive report on March 2014 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion about organized garbage hauling. Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014-2015 is • Communication and Engagement: "To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUp.Edina org. In March 2014, the discussion topic centered on organized garbage hauling. In this online discussion, the City posed the following questions: • Do you prefer to choose your garbage hauler, or would you prefer the City hold contracts (like recycling) with haulers so only one garbage hauler would be used per zone or City-wide? Why or why not? • What are the biggest concerns if the City were to move to a City -contracted garbage hauler? What are the benefits of keeping it the way it is? • They City provides a single recycling hauler, and residents are billed quarterly with their water bills. Would you support a similar payment structure? How much would you be willing to pay per quarter for City -contracted garbage service? The discussion was open for comments between Feb. 28 and April 1. During that time, 126 comments were made. Additionally, 1,229 people visited the site 1,762 times, garnering 8,689 page views. Of all the visitors to the site during that period, 55 percent were from Edina (according to their internet provider). The discussion was promoted through various means, including a press release, Edition: Edina, Facebook, Twitter and NextDoor posts and City Extra messages. is I Attached are the comments on this topic. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50*h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Speak Up. Edina! x Home iDiscussions Sign � • Idea • Surveys &nail ;email address... _–_— Password password... Sign In Lil<e Tweet) Share ,e y v reta� Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place fox living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! i, POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Organized Garbage Hauling The City wants to learn more about what people think about the organized garbage hauling. Some cities have mned garbage haulingwhere there are several haulers, but one per zone. Same cities even have one garbage hauler for the entire city, whereas Edina allows its residents to choose from a number of licensed haulers. See the topics to weigh inl Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback... 3 Topics 126 AnswersI Closed 2014-04-01 View Discussion Topic: Qrganize hauling? - Do you prefer to choose your garbage hauler, or would youprefer the City hold contracts (like recycling) with haulers so only one garbage hauler would be used per zone or City-wide? Why or why not? 86 Responses 86 Responses Jeannie Wood aboutl montliago It would depend for me on the organies6mid waste option. I pmposeMly selected Vierkant because they had (in my opinion) the best option it this category and would be upset if I had to (again in niy opinion) payrnore for less. 11 Supports •K'' �� Pete Lefebvre about] month ago I agree with Jeannie. We also use Merkant primarily for the organics option. I wouldn't be opposed to the city holding the contract provided that the selected bailer offered a fill slate of options (including year round organics/yard waste). 6 Supports 1 Jordan Ciloenbach admin about 1 month ago Pete and Jeannie, thanks for your cormnents! Those are good points to keep in mind. 0 Supports Sberl R about 1 month ago Pm a third in the V=kant because oforganics group. I would be very disappointed to lose this option 7 Supports Janetingram about] month ago We have lived here for 47 years and have always had vietkant. They are terrific. If we have a question or need something extra picked up, they are a phone call away. I hike that they are local and not some huge out of state company that cares nothing about this neighborhood. I will be very unhappy if we are forced to use another company. 6 Supports icomment... I Joe Corbett 20 days ago ---- ---r Reply to Pete Lefebwe It seems Ike there are enough -votes for organics here that die cityshould insist on bidders offering this optionin order to be considered. Our recycling cart is farmore firllthan our waste cart, and we'd love to see that waste amount become even smaller. At this point we would benefit from reversing the wasteh cycle schedule and off>;ring weekly recycliag/o boanic hauling and only bi monthly waste. Judging by bow fd our neighbor's recycling cats are, I believe others would see similar benefits. I Support comment.._ Reply to Joe Corbett comment... Reply to Jeannie Wood Joel Stegner about 1 month ago One refuse company per neighborhood, to teduce multiple runs on the same street. By vote of residents on different bids. One for wbole city only if favorable long-term contract is negotiated. 5 Supports ,:: Tracy Holtan 28 days ago I agree. Currently there are so many trucks on our streets with tear -down, rebuilds and all of the garbage trucks. They come in the morning when allof the chfldrea are going out to the bus stop. Not only is is bard on the streets, noisy, anti -green, excessive tiaf5c (I can barely get out ofmy driveway on ' Mondays) - itis not a safe situation for our ebildren who are going to the bus stop at the sante time all ofthe garbage bailers are driving through, or when children are out playing in the sunnner. 2 Supports Elizabeth X 28 days ago Completely agree. The multiple garbage trucks on our streets is a joke. The amount of CO2, the wear and tear- it is silly. Select ONE or two for the entire city and cut down on the noise and pollution ANOTHER THING _ Recyclables should be picked up EVERY WEEK. Currently, we only have recyclable pick up once a week and that is not enough. Add compost and recyclables every week. (especially since the Edina code on Private compost bins are ridiculously smallfor a a far north region where compost is only "active" fromMay- October.) I Support Reply to Tracy Holtan comment... I Reply to Joel Stegner ALchael Braun about I month ago One refuse company per neighborhood, by vote ofresidents with new bids and options voted on everycouple ofyears to keep it competitive. I live on a cul-de-sac and we have about a dozen trucks coming and going every trash day, one for regular trasb, one for organics, plus recycling - its ridiculous. What a waste of time, energy, wear and tear on our roads, pollution, noise, traffic ... it has to be less expensive to eboose one per neigbborhood 6 Supports mL Jordan (Akenbach admin about I month ago Hi M ebael, thanks for your feedback! That's a lot of truck traffic in one day, and those are good points you brought up about the effect of the mull ple trucks. 0 Supports comment... (comment... } �y z ALchael Braun about I month ago One refuse company per neighborhood, by vote ofresidents with new bids and options voted on everycouple ofyears to keep it competitive. I live on a cul-de-sac and we have about a dozen trucks coming and going every trash day, one for regular trasb, one for organics, plus recycling - its ridiculous. What a waste of time, energy, wear and tear on our roads, pollution, noise, traffic ... it has to be less expensive to eboose one per neigbborhood 6 Supports mL Jordan (Akenbach admin about I month ago Hi M ebael, thanks for your feedback! That's a lot of truck traffic in one day, and those are good points you brought up about the effect of the mull ple trucks. 0 Supports comment... Alike DeMoss aboutl monthago (Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Reply to Michael Braun I personally want to choose nay own garbage hauler, lawn service, etc. I want to have the option to cancel and switcb whenever I feel the service is nusatisfackuy. "One garbage battler" takes that decision away from me. Competition is the most important motivation for quality service at a reasonable price. Government contracts (in general) can result in sweetheart deals. Behind closed door negotiations wrMnot result in the best service at the best price. 12 Supports Jordan Gilgenbach admin aboutl monthago Iii Mike! Thanks for your continent! Great points on how competition affects price and service. 0 Supports r 0 France Matson 25 days ago I so agree! 11 thiole competition is best fur residents. -we can make our own decisions. I do not want to turn decisions over to the city! We bad a huge (comment... Alike DeMoss aboutl monthago (Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Reply to Michael Braun I personally want to choose nay own garbage hauler, lawn service, etc. I want to have the option to cancel and switcb whenever I feel the service is nusatisfackuy. "One garbage battler" takes that decision away from me. Competition is the most important motivation for quality service at a reasonable price. Government contracts (in general) can result in sweetheart deals. Behind closed door negotiations wrMnot result in the best service at the best price. 12 Supports Jordan Gilgenbach admin aboutl monthago Iii Mike! Thanks for your continent! Great points on how competition affects price and service. 0 Supports r 0 France Matson 25 days ago I so agree! 11 thiole competition is best fur residents. -we can make our own decisions. I do not want to turn decisions over to the city! We bad a huge recycle bin dropped in our yard:..did not fit in our garage. Called the City & asked to exchange, Nothing happened. Called again & finally after months they picked it up—but no exchange. Imitating situation!! ! I don't think the City wig handle this well I love our "Groan" and want to keep him forever! 0 Supports comment... - - Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Joe Corbett 20 days ago I believe most of these issues can be alleviated by the annual review process. If a bawler knows that poor reviews could lead to a non -renewal of contract, then they'll oar good service. We had excellent service in Mpls for 10 years, likely due to the haulers knowing they could easily be replaced if service levels declined. 2 Supports 'comment... i Reply to Joe Corbett comment... Reply to Mike 0 -Moss Chad Freeman about 1 mouth ago The competition between haulers has led to a lower cost on the one hand but we also pay for our road work via assessment here so long team our costs would he lower with a single hauler. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Chad Freeman LorenzoTonesi about] month ago I am in favor of having the city organize garbage hauling in large part because having many beavy garbage hocks from different companies drive city streets on garbage pick up day leads to unnecessary air pollution and road deterioration which we have to pay for. Cities Ike Minneapolis and St Louis Park (just to name two nearby ones) have successfully had city organized garbage hauling far years. There is no reason we cannot do the same. The city could ask for proposals fromhaulers that address residents' concerns such as the ones expressed above about organic/yard waste. 6 Supports Dorothy Lodahl about I month ago I have a niece in St. Louis Park, and she is unhappy with the service. If cover is not completely down, they won't pick up is Just one ofher commmplaints. 1 Support ,comment... comment... l Sandra x about I month age Reply to Dorothy Lodehl Reply to Lorenzo Tunes, I strongly support organized hauling How can we justify having mAiple trucks going up and down our streets when we are supporting a cleaner, greener city? The League of Women Voters did a study of various surrounding cities and kund organized hauling also saves money Jbr the homeowner because the city has more bargaining power than does an individual home owner. The system we use today is outdated and a throwback to when Edina was a vilage. • 7 Supports Frangy Matson about 1 mouth ago Don't think a competitive market is outdated ... we don't limit restaurants or Dentists or Gas Stations... Competition will continue to bringus service and great pricing. Note_ Edina has been a great place to We and popular since it was a Village! 5 Supports ML Jordan (Aagenbach admin about month ago Thanks Sandra and Franey for your comments! You both bring up very interesting points! 0 Supports • SkiuThnmas 20 days ago Right on Franey!! 0 Supports comment... i tcomment... L. - -- ---- —._ Je M Rplyto F ra ncyas .ton Reply to Sandra x The concerns regarding track tragic and pollution are certainly valid. However, we have additional concern regarding escalating costwhen a govermuental unit contracts with a single or just a few companies. Our personal experience is that ofhaving had rapidly escalating costs from a large, out-of-state based company over several years, (actually, the same one that collects recycling) and having been able to reduce our quarterly costs by 1/3 after switching to a smaller, local company. We believe that keeping garbage collection service competitive, and favoring localproviders whenever possible should be a priority. 6 Supports Jordan Giloenbach adndn about 1 month ago David, thanks for your comments. laterestingpoint about the the "big guys" versus the snsaller connpanies, and how that can effect service and price. 0 Supports :comment... SM.U...20 days ago Right on David -----Where have the cable costs gone ---out of sight J l l J l l l l l 0 Supports ;comment... JReply to Jordan Gllgenbach _._ Reply to. Skip Thomas comment... Reply to DWd Carlson RancyMatson about 1 month ago We LOVE our local Garbage Hauler!! They bave beconne number one in Eden Prairie in just a Jew -years because of their great service & low prices. Eden Prairie has a huge Land fill.not used by our favorite company S W S. They take trash to the Minneapolis Trash burner which is a much cleaner option. We are not for the City of Edina telling us who our Hauler will be. Allow Companies to compete so we get the best price and service! I also am happy with the City ofEdina making arrangements for recycle handliug. Yes, when Edina was a Village we bad a competitive market,,,We should continue to encourage competition. Trucks on our roads are ALL a problem, Construction trucks, Delivery Trucks, Cut through traffic Trucks..Mail Trucks... 5 Supports comment._. I I I Reply to Franey Matsonl Fr Bob D1cKhecn about 1 month ago I support one hauler per zone or two to choose from for the whole City. Such a solution would dramatically decrease the noise, air pollution, and wear & tear on our streets that we currently experience fromhaving six different haulers every week. Also, having all these trucks driving essentially every street in Edina significantly increases their total production of CO2 and other pollutants City-wide. One caveat, though we use Vierkant Disposal because they collect compostables and yard waste al year. Because of that service, phis one sort recycling • we generate less than 1/4 can of garbage per week, sending far less to landfills. I would want whatever contracts are offered in the City to include a corrpostable collection option. Our former hauler used to do compostables but dropped the service because they own their own landfills. Without corrpostables in their landfills, since they were diverting to compost sites, then the landfills don't generate methane, and harvested methane was a major source oftheir revenue. Finally, Vierkant is a faimly company that does a great job. If I'm late taking orrt the trash, they'll actually ]mock on my door so I can open the garage, and theyll take it out for me. WOW 7 Supports Jordan CRI-enbach admin about 1 month ago Bob, great continents. The issue of organics recycling is an interesting, and one that seems to becoming more and more popular. Thanks for weighing in! 0 Supports comment... -- -- -----� Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Reply to Bob McKheen Dan Nye about 1 month ago I want to chose my own garbage hauler. I can make the decision about price and service that better fits my needs and most likely will conflict with some standardized standardized contract the city arranges. Remember, this is the United States of America and not some nanny state. People like their freedom even if it is only saving moneyby choosing their own garbage hauler or picking one that better fits their needs. . 5 Supports i Mary Porter 21 days ago I want the choice to determine the services I pay for. I understand the traffic issue as I live on a busy residential street but I am willing to live with that. I Support oomment ... i comment... i Kwx about 1 month ago I -! Reply to Mary Porter JI Reply to Dan Nye Everyone has a favorite hauler - they chose them, rve changed haulers several times because of decline in service and price games. Regardless, the small advantage of choice is minor compared to the public safety issues of multiple trucks going down the street on trash day, wear and tear on the roads (we pay for themwith assessments) and hydranlic fluid leaks on my street Many streets have no sidewalks and walking on trash day is risky. The trash day goes on and on depending on the carrier so trash cans are out on the curb for a longer time. I would support a competitive bid process for single hauler in each neighborhood. Having priced haulers recently, they are all pretty close to the same price. 2 Supports ML Jordan Qhmnbach arbnin about] month ago KW, thanks for your comments and insight ou pricing! 0 Supports Icomment... - ------ -- 's Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach canment... i I � Reply to Kw x n Robert lime about 1 month ago I appreciate that Edina provides residents with a listing ofavarlabb garbage haulers. I do Ike the flexibrEty of selecting ury own garbage bauler; however, I would Ike an opportunity to provide feedback on the pricing practices of the garbage hauler Aspen. I bad them provide excellent service for approximately 20 years when I teamed from a neighbor that I was paying far more than new customers and other long term customers. I learned that eachresident must contact the Aspen and threaten to change to another garbage banters to obtain services at a substantially reduced price. An Aspen representative actually told me how long I had been a customer, how I had always paid my bill early, and drat I had been subjected to every pricing increase over many years and she was glad to lower my pricing. Ironically, the pricing increases started immediately after I negotiated a lower price and continued until I called again. I changed providers to GarbapMan and locked in a price for an extended period. I hated playing the game with Aspen. I think Aspen's pricing practices sbould be reviewed and if found to be unethical, they should be removed from the Est ofavailable garbage haulers. 1 Support comment.. ----- - - _ i Carol Pfleidererabout I month ago Reply to Robert Have rd love to see a single hauler for a neighborhood and would choose Veikant for all the reasons listed above. The pollution and road wear created by multiple trucks, in addition to the danger where so marry kids are playing, are concerns to me also. 3 Supports comment. Lisa Nelson about 1 month ago JReply to Carol Pfleiderer The number oftrucks in the neighborhood on collectionday does seem to be a bit senseless but I ani also a staunch supporter ofthe smallbusiness and they are the ones who seem to get left out in these situations. I do not Ike being forced to deal with companies who don't have to earn my business day in and day out I am so pleased to see all the positive comments about Verkants in this forun-rn. As a 9 year customer I can say that they are far and away the highest quality and responsive collector I have ever encountered. VVI& I support efficiency I would be terribly disappointed to have Edina or myselflose such a quality provider on my route. I am not sure how many providers currently are operating in Edina but perhaps further limiting that number could preserve competition and yet ease congestion and redundancy. I would not limit those providers by region though. Free market! Thank You DarrenNelson 4 Supports +comment.,.-._._.._ I • ---- ------------ Reply to Lisa Nelson Morris Wee about month ago Single hauler per neighborhood, with contracts reconsidered regularly to maintain quality. I believe city officials can do a better job than I can of assessing the competition --especially ifwe customers give them feedback. 5 Supports comment... �I Reply to Morris Wes Donna DAauila about 1 month ago I'll choose ray own, thank you. My current "hauler" is CHEAPER than Vierkauk 2 Supports comment... Reply to Donna D'Aquila Nils Gokemelier about 1 month ago I see a lot ofr ssponses stating that there is too much wear and tear on our roads with the current system There already is a solution to that Get together with your neighbors and select a single hauler. I favor the current system because it offers the most choices: do you care about landfills, organics, incinerators, price: you can select your hauler based on your choices. Get everyone on your street to agree, and there will be just one truck. 1 Support Am Jordan Gileenbach aEbuin 25 days ago Nils, do you and your neighbors do this, or do you know if any others that are? Has it been successful? 0 Supports comment... ____......__...__ .. .__..__. / I Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach comment... Reply to Nils Gokerneijer 1 syE� IU i Ode about I month ago rd signed in here to express my loyalty to Vierkant, for their organics policies; and their extra -step personal service. Not to mention getting a handwritten bill! A superb local company. So happy to see all the other positive responses. The solution may be to clone Viorkant. I get the wear -and -tear arguments, although wonder about this issue rising to the surface just as our streets have been overrun with home demolition/construction vehicles for the past few years. I don't Ike the hauler decision being taken out of my hands, but only because I don't want to chance losing Vier leant If standards for all haulers cornld rise to their level, then the whole community would benefit. 4 Supports 3 FrancyA9atson 19 days ago Great corn t ...I agree! Note, I think the Builder pays the city for any damage to the streets ... but I don`t really know where that money goes. Once the street is wom out we KNOW who pays for the new street We have had 3 new construction homes within a few houses of ours. When the dutnpster truck arrives and drops the new dumpster on the street while theyhaul away the old one it rocks our home and ratdes our dishes... street damage galore. Never had that with a garbage truck. I wonder the weight difference. 0 i Reply to Francy Matson ------ Reply to Kim Ode comnrent... I hope we will be allowed to continue with Vierkant. Their service to us over 45 or so years has been simply superior. If we need something picked up or taken care of out of the ordinary, they always help, always timely, always agreeable. I ------� Reply to marian cracraft We would prefer the City to hold contracts with one contractor per area. We weren't aware of the Vierkant compostables option, but will look into switching to them fir that reason. I dislike having to call arotmd periodically to see who will give me the 'best deal" and then finding that my current hauler will meet that lowest price. We also are concerned about tine noise, road wear & tear and air pollution. Tire garbage, which we only fill 1/2 a can at roost, should go to the garbage burner. 2 Supports comment... Karim Chris tenss on about I month ago a Reply to SUSAN JEPSEN We have had Vierkant service for close to thi ty years, We would not want to lose there either. However, the noise and volume of trash haulers each Monday is over the top awU We will be having our street re -built this summer with a significant price to pay for each homeowner. Unnecessary wear and tear on our new road will be really hard to take after living through the construction period and facing yeas ofpayrnents for the project. 3 Supports ;comment... Reply to Karen Christensson Kelli con Heydekamuf about 1 month ngo I use Vlerkant and love them If Edina chooses to go with a contractor program, they must include an organics bawling similar to Vierkant's. I love the fact that Vierkant is a small, family -run business. 4 Supports comment ... Laurie Fetterman about 1 month ago Reply to Kelil ,on Heydekampf The city can negotiate annua%r for the best rate maintaining the competitive rates that are now offered. My guess is that as the city would be a huge contract, our rates would decline. To have 20 trucks a day nurnurg down the streets is bard ou the infimn xture. Given the costs ofreplaciug the streets -the long temr cost ofmultiple haulers is too bigh. 2 Supports comment... ------- ----- Reply to Laurie Fetterman I I' Sandra McGoldrick Kendall about 1 month ago I agree with M -B. above. I lived at the end of a dead-end in Edina for many years, with an alley. My garbage was picked up in the alley behind my house, but myneig4bors across the street had their garbage picked up on the street. So, everyMonday, three bucks (trash, yard, and recycling) from three different companies (9 trucks altogether) would drive down the street in front ofmy house, then back up the entire distance because they could not turn • around, beeping the whole way. In back, in the alley, the same nine trucks collected from our side of the street It's crazy! I had truck noise in stereo all moming. It ruined the roadway and the alley; they both needed constant repass. For me personally it was disasterous. I work nights, and could never sleep through the constant truck traffic, and nay dog was frightened of the trucks, so Monday was spent trembling inside. Ugh I live on a through street now, but this system is ridiculous. 3 Supports comment--. Reply to Sandra McGoldrick -Kendall Diane Schroeder about 1 month ago Although I have been very, veryliappy with Aspen as our, trashbauler, I wholeheartedly support going to one trash company per neighborhood or for the city. It is incredibly impleasant to be out in the neighborhood on Thursday momings due to the constant parade of=ks. How can we possiblyJustdy the pollution, the wear and tear on the roads, and the morning -long ruckus when there is an alternative? We live on a small circle street with no through traflic, and I suspect that most weeks the only bucks that cone through are garbage trucks- Moving to one hauler would cut our truck naffr, byprobably at least 80 percent As someone who paid Just last year (a lige sum) for a street re -do, I would love to lose this superfluous truck traffic. 4 Supports comment .. . Reply to Diane Schroeder 0 Hope Melton about I month ago Freedom of choice is the bedrock of our Ii-ee enterprise economy. It works really well except when it interferes or damages the common good. Having 6 or 7 different haulers roaring througuneigiborboods inflicts more damage to our streets thanwould a single hauler. We allpaybigher taxes to repair the damage. Furthermore, the City's Do Town has us all thinking about walking and biking to support healthier lifestyles. I like to walk with my dog, in the middle of the day. When there are no sidewalks (inost ofthe City at present). With inultiple trucks, it's dangerous, smelly, and noisy. That said, I use Verkant because they offer organic recycling, they're reasonably priced, and it's a local business_ With organic recycling, my contribution to the land fill is almost nail. If this is a "green city" as we say, it seems to rix that the City should choose a company that o$ers organic recycling. S Supports AML MLI Jordan Gilgenbach admin 25 days ago Thanks for your comment, Hope! Sometimes, it's easy to forget that not all neigbborhoods have sidewalks, making the roads diflicult for cats, bikes and walkers alike to navigate among all die bins and tricks. 0 Supports comment... --------------- i i Reply to JorWw G!Igenbach comment... Reply to Hope Melton Karen Sandler Steinertl area Sandler Steinert about 1 month ago We also choose Vierkant because they have an organics option and area great family companythat provides eustorner service - unbeard offrom most businesses in this day and age. Most of out- trash is organics and I would bate to lose that option. (comment... I Reply to Karen Sandler Steinert Karen Sandier Steinert Karen Sandler Steinert Karen Sander Steinert about l month ago I should add that we greatly dishke every other week recycling because what isn't organics is recycling at our house and our bun is overflowing on recycling week. I would greatly dislike a single haul system that is at all like our recycling system without flexibilky for families' needs hike private garbage companies are able to give when contracting directly with families. I do understand the pollution, traffic and noise concerns so I wouldn't rule out a single provider, but it would be nice if each family could contract with the provider directly according to that family's needs. 0 Supports i Reply to Karen Sandier Steinert Karen Sandler Steinert Undazemoel aboutl month ago We Ike our cuaent garbage hauler. Competition between companies has always been the best_ option for keeping costs down and services up. We don't believe that garbage trucks on onr streets once a week impacts our road system We should be able to pick our own service providers since it is our cost. 3 Supports k i Mary Yee 28 days ago Please see MN Pollution Control Agency s study atb9pJ/www,pca.state, mnus/index bpr /view-document.htni?gid=17347 for effects onroads, pollution, fuel usage, etc. Also the research literature shows consistently lower consumer costs when hauling is organized. 0 Supports JIm Wan -en about I month ago I would like to see our newly resufaced road last as long as possible, so I would be in favor of a city contract for one or two bailers. To ensure cost is controlled and service levels remain satisfactory, I would suggest a 2 year bid tyle for this business. 5 Supports • Frans Vers fuis about I month ago Not surprisingly, the website from the garbage haulers association asserts that "the few trucks such a [ pvemment] takeover might get offthe streets will not save the roads, but will restrict your fieedom to choose, smother innovation, increase government bureaucracy, and reduce competitors in the market, especially for small family-owned baubrs." First, I don't think we are suggesting that for the city to get into the hauling business. So this is not a "takeover" but rather a streamlining of a service. Road damage: I would agree that road damage from Minnesota's winters probably causes more damage to Edina roads than the garbage trucks. However, there are cost savings to be realized that would more than likely result in lower prices for garbage pick up. There will be significant cost savings from having just one truck picking up garb age (fuel, maintenance, labor etc). In addition there are the hidden costs of CO2 exhaust (why can't they drive on natural gas Bureaucracy. I am not sire how much bureaucracy issuing an annual or biannual bid for hauling services by neighborhood or for the entire city will be created. After all the city already issues many bids on an annual basis. Freedomto choose: I wonder how many people really are aware oftlne differences in service. Most people do not have the time to compare the various services. A bid process would probably do a better job selecting a responsible, cost efficient service. I for one would be happy to haw a city engineer make that selection for me. Smother innovation: Not sure how much more innovation their is in hauling garbage. TI= innovation I have seen pertains to making the process more time efficient by using robotic arms. You could argue that a single hauler system would drive more cost out of the process that could be used to invest in cleaner hocks. My -vote would be for a single bauler byneighborhood in the initialpbase and then study wbether a single bailer fDr the entim city would make more sense. I Support comment... • ( Reply to Frans Versluis I will also note that onrecycling, you are able to upgrade to the largest recycling bin ifyou'd Ike, Ifyou find the cart is not large enough to hold all your recycling, you can also request an additional cart There is no additional cost. Please can Allied/Republic Services at 952-941-5174 to assist with that change. 0 Supports (comment... Icomment..- Jeffilill about1 month ago Reply to Jordan Gllgenbach ---- --I Reply to Art Vandalals I want to select my hauler. I want to be able to fu -e my hauler. Corucast and CenturyLink have taught Edna residents low we are treated by single source providers. The bigger firms bave much more clout and skill at negotiating with municipalities and the Me guys are forced out. ...and isn't it amazing that single sauce hauling is only a tiny bit cheaper than baving 3-4 rums down every street? A testaruent to the imfliciency of singke sourcing. Please see the MN Po]hrtionAgency Study at hri.p)/www.pca-at—ate.nimusfmdex.pbp/view-docurnentliftH?gid=1734 . Organized hauling consistently brings lower prices than Edina's open system Ask St. Louis Park and Hopkins residents. 1 Support 9L Jordan Gil-fenbach admin 25 days ago You both bring tip interesting points- Would you rather have a cheaper price, or better service? Trying to find that balance is the tricky park 0 Supports comment.. Reply to Mary Yee jcomment... • 5 hannon Murphy Robinson about 1 nwnth ago We want to select our hauler. Our driveway is off a long private that our 3 households have to maintain and is not maintained by the city. We specifically selected Garbage Man because of their small truck and service. The small truck is much less wear and tear on the alley asphalt. If the city want to switch to a single supplier, than maintain our alley so we do not incur the additional expense. 3 Supports comment... F: I f Reply to Shannon Murphy Robinson Patrick Manley about 1 month ago I believe the City should contract the haulers. Divide the city into four quadrants and open each for bid. Now we have six different haulers every Thursday in my area in addition to the recycle buck every other week Too nnmh noise - too much wear and tear on the street.comrnent... 0 Supports comment... __._....... .-.— ...... .......... ........ . -----.._—_—__ __.... — --- ---- .. -- .......... __ Reply to Patrick Finley . C ' la f3 _. .... s� Patrick Flak about I month ago I believe the City should contract the haulers. Divide the city into foie quadrants and open each for bid. Now we have six different haulers every Thursday in my area in addition to the recycle truck every other week. Too much noise - too much wear and tear on the street.comment... 0 Supports — - - ------ - ----- _..- -------- ---- comment... Reply to PatHck Finley Patrick Male v about t month ago I believe the City should contract the haulers. Dhide the city into four• quadrants and open each fnr bid. Now we have six different haulers every Thursday in my area in addition to the recycle truck every other week. Too much noise - too much wear and tear on the street. connuent .. 1 Support .comment... i - -� Reply to Patrick Rnley Connie Soteropmlos aboutl month ago I would like to keep the choice mine. I personally do not feel this is a area where city government should be involved. 3 Supports SkinThomas 20 days ago Right on Connie l l l 0 Supports rcomment.. Reply to Skip Thomas comment... -- -- - ---- --- Reply to Connie Soteropulos Paul Nelson about I month ago To help keep our neighborhoods saki- and easier to navigate on "garbage" days, I would be willing to have the City negotiate hauling contracts either• City- wide or per quadrant on a two-year basis. This still would require 3 trucks to pass by each week - seems like enough to me. Reply to Raul Nelson For anyone who is present during the day to see the parade ofbaulers streaming by, it is clear that the current system must be extremely wastefiil in terms of fuel, damaging to the roads, and potentially dangerous to pets, children, and the elderly. On any given nebbish day at least five companies' vehicles buzz up and down ny street, eachpassing more houses than it stops to service. I am very supportive of the city investigating options for a single city wide carrier or zone based single carriers. It appears that is what has already been done in terms ofrecyclurg, and that seems to have worked well thus far. I would very nruch like to see the facts on what residents are paying now to the various providers and what what the City could accomplish in a transparent competitive 40bidding process as a "single payer" with much more clout than any of us have. Faced with the facts, some of the people who think tbeyve negotiated such a great deal today might be surprised . Finally, for tlwse who currently use someone because they collect compost or yard waste, those options could be bruit into the citywide bidding process as well 2 Supports comment... Reply to Bob York Bob Granson about 1 month ago I prefer to select my own provider. Over my 40 years as a homeoumer in Edina I have changed providers perhaps three times. I believe I have more control over the price and quality of service. If I am unbappy with either I can go elsewhere. Ifthe city has a contract with a provider who handles the entire city is that provider going to care if one household is unhappy? No government contracts I say. 4 Supports Jordan Gdeenbaeb admin 25 days ago Bob, good points. You, as the consumer, are the ultimate controller with your dollars to spend on garbage services. The ability to change providers can give consumers great leverage when it comes to negotiating services, term and pricing. Thanks for chiming inl 0 Supports comment... `comment... EM, Christenson 30 days ago I 1 Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach After 30 years ofpetfect service Viekant continues to be otu- choice, As far as I am aware they are the only fill service option. Besides the organic hauling preferred by many, they are only a phone -call away from hauling away bulky debris from a construction project with their pick-up puck. Never fails. They have earned their• way to stay in our neighborhood. 0 Supports 'comment... i vsmith 29 days ago I I Ghristensson comaimt...I want to choose my own garbage hauler. Too often tbe'Big Boys" ie, companies are offering the lowest bid and it guarantees nothiogl The free • open market is what keeps things competitive. I am tired of government interfering with every detail Because we are able to choose who hauls the garbage, most of the people in our neighborhood have switched to a smaller local company and are much happier than when the large companies hauled the garbage. 2 Supports • comment... Reply to v smfth Wary Yee 28 days ago I was shocked whenI moved to Edina to find so many trucks on1he street on collection day. While competition frommultiple providers often results in better prices for consumers, that is NOT the case with an openhan ing system Ike Edina's. The research literature shows, on a nationalbasis, consistently lower prices with organized hauling The MN Pollution ControlAgency has summarized the findings in their study. See hM2Y/www. state.mn.us/index.1hp/view-document.bmil?gid=17347. For a League of Women Voters' local study, I contacted neighboring cities to !eau about their arrangements and prices. St. Louis Park contracts with a private company to haul waste for the entire city and the rate is much lower than the average for Edina% multiple haulers. SLP residents have consistently rated the service highly is the city's surveys. Hopkins uses m nicipal employees to haul trash and its residents pay a lower price on average than Edina residents. Eden Prairie has a similar system to Edba!s and its residents pay similarly high prices. Price is not the only consideration. People sbouYl also take into account the wear and tear on roads, the pollution, the noise, the excessive fuel usage (which is well-documented by the MN Pollution Control Agency's study), and the danger of truck traffic. I understand concern about the viability of local businesses and I use Yerkant myselfbecause I value their compost collection option. However, there are ways to orgariw trash hauling to take into account desirable features such as composting. It makes no more sense to have so many trash haulers running through residential neighborhoods than it wondd to have all of us try to generate electricity on our own. Trash hauling is a public utility and we should try to organize the service in the most efficient, least polluting manner possible. 1 Support comment... kerrykinida26 days ago J Reply to Mary Yee Yes! I support organized garbage hauling makes sense for 3 reasons: I. By consolidating, pickup the city sbould be able to negotiate lower rates than what an individual household currently pays. We, lived in nimneapolis for 10 years where they have consolidated garbage pickup and it was reasonably priced and convenient 2. It would reduce the numbers oflarge trucks driving through our neigbhorhoods. As a mother of 3 kids under 5 years old I worry about these large garbage trucks that pass by air home 8 times on garbagn day (yes, 8 times)! 3. Per Judith F, I agree by increasing route efficiency there should be less CO2 emitted -- good for the earth. 1 Support comment... •; AL Jordan Gileenhaeb admin 25 days ago -- .1 Reply to kerry kirHda Out of curiosity, has anyone privately made an agreement with haulers and neighbors on your street to all chose the same hauler for a lower price? Pm interested to know if this is happeningwitlurt in the City. 0 Supports ,comment... i I N,. Susan Cliandter 22 days ago -- - ---- Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach I amiafivor• of the City holding the contractwith a single garbage hauler for a zone or the whole City. As many others have mentioned, the issues ofnoise, disruption, pollution, safety, ineficiency, and costly wear and tear on our sheets make this the most logical choice. I would prefer that the City engage in regular (ie., annual or biennial) competitive bidding to ensure low rates. Garbage hauling tees are hardly secrets, so the City should be able to negotiate fees that benefit rather than harm residents. 0 Supports icomment... Reply to Susan Chandler I prefer to contract this on my own, but I do understand the advantages of having one bawler. 1 Support 'comment... -------------- -----/ Reply to Bruce Kiefer Skiplhomas 20 days ago I like competition. Itbreeds lower prices. S WS is a good example of this. I get 3 months of service and about $20 less per billing period far what I was paying with Allied for 2 months service. Keep the competition alive 11 0 Supports comment... Reply to Skip Thomas w'v ,- ;I EN �, _. `l Ni M BarryRosenthe120 days ago Definitely organize the citys garbage hauling. We will get better pricing through a competitive procurement process covering hundreds or thousands of • homes, and will end up with less traffic and noise. There are marry valid comments against the city organizing trash collection, but they could easily be managed in a well-designed procurement process and ongoing management Placing contracts by zones maybe better than one city-wide contract to ensure continuous comparison of service. If one hauler is not keeping up with the contractual requirements or the satisfaction levels of other companies in other zones, the city could move the contract to another company_ The contract could include a city -run satisfaction survey and the lowest -scoring contractor each year could be replaced. To help smaller local companies, there could be a slight advantage for locally based companies in the procurement process. If someone really, really loves their current hauler, there could be an individual opt -out I think very few people would bother doing that, particularly if zone purchasing results in lower costs. I switched haulers after years ofnot watching my bill and then finally realizing how nwh the fast company bad quietly raised rates by tacking on a range offees. We would all be better off ifwe had competitive city procurernents periodically so this type of thing wouki get brought to light. 0 Supports comment.. I Jennifer Aaenel.19 days ago Reply to Barry Rosenthal Please allow us to keep o- r own garbage hauling service. The service I receive from my current garbage hauler fat• exceeds what happens with the city contracted recycling company (bins left open in the rain/snow, bins left tipped over at the end of the driveway, etc). My garbage hauler cleans up their mess, and I appreciate it! 0 Supports . :comment... Leslie Iver 19 days ago I ------- ------ -- —� Reply to Jennifer Haenel I strongly support single hauler. Having 8+ trucks barreling down our streets every week (double that in the spring through fall) is bad for our street maintenance ($), for our students who are trying to safely walk to school, and for our air quality. Cities with single -balder have mueb lower rates than we are currently getting at our best, and if the citizens support organics pickup, etc, we can inrlt'rlr that as a condition oftbose competitive bids. This is long overdue - 0 Supports comment... --- ------ Reply to Leslie Iyer Gree Arnott 18 days ago • I have seen several comments about multiple trucks on collection day, but -think about those of us that border two collection areas. We have 5-8 trucks fi-om different garbage trucks one day going up and down our street and then the next. day we bave the same number oftmcks from the sane haulers going up and down the street collecting the other side of the street. As we are on a collector streetwe also have extra trucks just coming and going to access the area. I used to Min St. Louis Park and was very happywith the service. If I bad extra iterns (not large) they were picked up at no charge, I understand the cost issue as I recently switched haulers as a matter ofpractice I periodically check prices and found my hauler and found a hauler that charged considerably less than the hauler I bad used for several years. I fully expect that if the city goes to city-wide hauling, my rates will go up but others will Likely go down because with city-wide hauling we may not have the same options we have now for the size of the carts. But I am willing to pay that with the hopes that the road maintenance costs will not increase as fast and it will reduce the barrels of oil that have to be pumped out of the ground only to be burned and pollute the air we all have to breath. It wouldn't have to be one large hauler that received the contract for the entire city as the smaller haulers could farm a consortium and compete with the large haulers if they didn't feel they could bid on the entire contract alone. I asked a member of a city comuuttee that likely would have been very involved with this subject a few years ago iftbe city had discussed city-wide hauling and he said a member of the City stafffelt that the citywould receive a lot of calls on pickup issues so be discouraged exploring city-wide hauling. 1 Support ,comment... j Reply to Greg Amott Paul Gicim 17 days ago Now that St Louis Park has tried organized hauling and found that it is less expensive than the competitive system we have, I thiol: we (Edina) should take advantage of their experience and switch to organized hauling. If it does not turn out as welt as it did in St. Louis Park, it would not be hard to switch back to what we have now, but without trying it we'll never know what works best for Edina. 0 Supports icomment... I ----� Reply to Paul Glewwe JoAnn Hillstrom 16 days ago I supporthaving waste baul'urg organized by the city for allthe reasons previously mentioned. Perhaps different service levels could be arranged to satisfy the needs oftbe loyal Vierlcant customers. 0 Supports ,comment. — Reply to JoAnn Hillstrom Sign Up Connect email address... Sign Up Participants • • • Speak Ulh. Edina! Home • Discussions sign nrum Ideas • serve Email email address... .....------- Password password... Sign In 1. Lilco it Tweati Share I c e • ,1LOrtrx)tt�n�.9 • This Discussion channel is currently closed. Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedbacki ► POST your ideast t JOIN the discussion) Discussion: Organized Garbage Hauling The City wants to learn more about what people think about the organized garbage hauling Some cities have zoned garbage hauling where there are several haulers, but one per zone. Some cilies even have one garbage hauler for the entire city, whereas Edina allows its residents to choose from a number of licensed haulers. See the topics to weigh in! Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. Byusingthis online discussion, feedback... 3 Topics 126 AnswersI Closed 2014-04-01 View Discussion Topic: Phos and Cons of Garbage Hauline What are you biggest concerns if the City were to move to a City -contracted garbage harder? What are the benefits of keeping it the way it is? 24 Responses 24 Responses Joel Stegner about) month ago Most think status quo is not working - look for a new approach. I Support conanent ... -- ------ -- --- JII Reply to Joel Stegner Mehael Braun about 1 month ago A huge benefit to allow neighborhoods to vote for one hauler every couple ofyears - I live on a cul-de-sac and we have about a dozen trucks coming and going every trash day, one for regular trash, one for organics, plus recycling - its ridiculous. What a waste of time, energy, wear and tear on our roads, pollution, noise, traffic ... it has to be less expensive to choose one per neighborhood 2 Supports comment... — --- Reply to Michael Braun Robert Aderhold about 1 month ago I prefer a single hauler to lots of big trucks on our street. This strikes me. as very inefficient and wasteful of non-renewable energy. Pve used several waste haulers in my 18 years in Edina and have found the quality of their service about the same. It would seemto me that we should be able to get as good a deal from a negotiated contract. I find that our household generates very little waste that does not go into our recycling bin or conpost heap. It would be nice ifreducelrecycle behavior could be rewarded in a new system 3 Supports Jordan Gilmenbach admin about 1 month ago Robert, thanks for your comment idea about encouraging residents to reduce their trash generation! 0 Supports comment... comment... Pop t Ann Anderson about] month ago i i .s Reply to Jordan Gllgenbach ----- — Reply to Robert Aderhold • We should keep our current system This is the type of small-business competition that is capitalism in its good fonn--that keeps the companies on their toes and providing good service. If I get mad at my bawler, I can change to another one. My companyts montlily charge is not cheap, but I know they will respond if I have a problem If the city just has one hauler, there won't be this type of incentive. 2 Supports 11 Jordan Gllgenbach admin about 1 month ago Good points about service levels, Ann! Cheaper is clearly not always better. Thanks for your comments! 0 Supports !comment... — --- --- ----- Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Mary Porter 21 days ago Competition fasters better service and pricing overall I want a choice. 0 Supports jcomment... i Reply to Mary Porter -- - ...---- — ------ ---- ----- commEnt... Reply to Ann Anderson i' F-11 p_ David Carlson about I month ago We are concerned that the city will be likely to contract with a large, out-of-state based company, as they did with the recycling service. We found that company, who'd been our garbage service for years, was very difficult to deal with, phis very expensive. If as suggested above, the carrier could be selected on a neighborhood basis, that would give more assurance that the process would be truly competitive. 1 Support i Jordan Gilgenbach admin about I month ago David, That's a good idea. Ifa change is ever proposed in the future regarding garbage hauling, it's good to keep in mind cornminity input and possibly on a neighborhood byneighborbood basis. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach comment... Reply to David Carlson Dick ErIands on about 1 month ago I prefer the current system We have options for service and price in dealing whit private companies that we would be sacrificing to change the system to a government one. Please leave the present garbage service arrangement alone. 2 Supports comment... -- Reply to Dick Edandson Dan Nye about 1 month ago Mybiggest concem about going to a city' chosen bawler is a matter offwdom. The "green fanatics" are trying to push their beliefs onme and making me live under their rule. I have a different view of this topic than them Ifthe city goes to one hauler; my freedoms are being trampled on by others. Secondly, low did that recycling contract go? If I remember rigK the contractor had no made any payments to the city for all those resources they collect antro a news organization pressed the issue. Givnig the government control of a contract Ike this is not going to result in financial efficiency. 1 Support ;comment... i Kwx about 1 month ago Read several studies of single hauler systems in our metro and elsewhere. Typically, single hauler systems result in savings. I support single hauler and feel our local government can manage the bidding process. I Support comment... - ----- --- - ---- — tReply to Kw x gr Jon Barnett about I month ago • When we moved bear 24 years ago, we used a national company to take our trash, we then had someone (mock on our door and we switched to save money. That went welhfor a longtime and then we weren't too happy with their service so we switched to a new start up company about 9 years ago. They've been great: They answer the phone with a 'real person' and they've saved me about $7.00 per month over the national. I agree, there will likely be less traffic ifthe city changes ies mind and goes to a one -vendor solution but the consequences of that decision need to be weighed carefully. As a small business owner, I put myself in the shoes of the company owner who has worked for years to build their business in our town. Theyve probably borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars to buy the trucks, hire and fi-63 peoplo to pick-up and drop our garbage, maintain their fleet and staff their offices to handle al[ the day today. We as a town have encouraged the free enterprise system to allow choice and businesses have been built to meet those needs. The consequences are big and I don't think iPs fair that we as a town can say. Thanks for building your businesses, we're efnninating the companies you've just built I hope you can replace the accounts we've eliminated. rm concerned the next decision will be that I can't use my snow plow service because there are too rnany different trucks coming down my street to plow snow or provide our lawn service. The argument that the small companies can bid on it sounds good but I can't imagine our garbage guy taking the chance to get the whole town's business and then having to add a lot oftrucks and people with the chance that tbeyll lose the business when they re -let the contract.and they're stuck with all the trucks and people. Hopefiully we'll think carefitlly about the ramifications of our decisions and what is a fair and equitable way to handle this decision 4 Supports MmberlyBarret tabout I month ago Jon's points about 1) the small business owner who has invested potentially thousands upon thousands of dollars into a business which serves specific areas of town, only to lose business due to a city-wide change, and 2) who might be able to bid on the city-wide business, invest thousands more, and potentially lose the contract at renewal, are both valid and real arguments and sbould be given a fair amount ofweight 3 Supports • conunent... i comment... Donna DAquila about 1 month ago 1 Reply to Kimberly Barrett ................ __ __ _ __. ._ __ __ _ / Reply to Jon Barnett The benefits ofkeeping as is .... I get to choose who I want as nlyprovider...I thunk they call it my LIBERTY! 2 Supports comment... ---! I Reply to Donna D'Aqulla i • Catherine Groat about 1 month ago Itis disconcerting to think that people would place a greater priority on being able to choose their own hauler over the safety of our neigh orhood children, environmental stewardship and wear & tear on our city roads. Most people would agree that we have an abundance of heavy trucks on our roads each week We live on an alley. Every Wednesday we have The Garbage Man, Allied Waste Recycling, Yard Waste hauler in summer, Vierkant hash and Vierkant compost trucks up and down our road. My only concern about moving towards a single bauler is the lack of composting that Vierl=t offers. AD • other haulers have a yard waste option, but Vierkant has the only true curbside compost option. As a fm* ON, we have 1 tall kitchenbag of trash a week The rest is recycle or compost Doesn't it make sense that we are good stewards of our environment? rm flabbergasted that this is not a common viewpoint Does liberty give us the right to abuse our earth? To compare huge heavy garbage trucks with local snow removaltrucks is Ike comparing apples and oranges. The wear and tear on roads is not comparable. As for free enterprise. Isn't that determated by good set -vice and prices? 2 Supports I =- lumberty. Barret[ about 1 month ago Cathy -- a monopoly of a garbage hauler is not free enterprise. You know that I share your view of the environment and yes, I would Ike to find a happy medittnto reduce the amount oftiucks but -the, last thing I wart is a "Waltnad' of a garbage battler numing through the city putting the mom and pop shops out of business. I fear that "the little gtty" that we both know and love would not be able to compete with the national outfits, mostly for the reasons Jon stated above. I would be happy with a reduction in the amount of choices ofgarbage haulers (currently, there are 7 according to the city's website). Perhaps going down to no more than three would be reasonable. It would reduce the number of trucks, but yet still offer free enterprise/competitive market/cboice. 3 Supports Art Vandalais about 1 month ago • Kimberly, picking 3 vendors as a landomnumber out of thin air is no better than a govt sponsored monopoly. I can sense you're tying to compromise but It sounds Ike a decision based on nothing more than to appease someone trying to build a false case based on the 'the safety of our neighborhood children". I am a father of 4 and we all love our kids, there is no garbage truck safety issue and ies driven only on emotion and no fact Making up a fake crisis to drive an environmentaf agenda is shameless on its face. Catherine should just be honest and say she doesn't Ike the noise and chaos fromnsrltiple big trucks and a fake global warning crisis and leave it at that, that's a fait argument 0 Supports �o—ent-.. 11 s — —.-___ __-.—-NYto KhbeBaett SUSANMS17V aboutl month ago Our biggest concern is that negotiated savings wouldn't necessarily be passed on to is afrer a battler is selected for out area. 1 Support • Sandi,Ra&ke aboutI month ago I understand the desire for fewer trucks on garbage day, but perhaps the answer is to have fewer oftlre large companies allowed as permitted choices than to go to single hauler•. I use a small local company, Vierkant, because they saved me a significaut amount over my old large company hauler, because the large bauler bad terrible customer service, and even more because of the compostables option, Between recycling and the thurgs I can put in the compostables bur, my actual trash is very little. Some weeks I don`t have enougli to put out Although Vierkant has invested a lot into their business, they couldn't compete for a city-wide contract. If the city does go to universal, I would want them to make sure that those ofus who want compostables service would still be able to get I Also, there would need to be sonic kind of custorner service/quality control aspect to the contract. I have not been impressed with the level of service from the recycling provider. If thing fall out ofthe bur while it is being lifted into the truck, they don't come out and pick them up -- they just sit there until I get home carless they blow away fast 0 Supports 'comment... Reply to Sandy Radeke _ _ _ __. -- _ _ _ __-- ._._ _ ----__-_.-- erin lysen about I month ago I think one hauler makes sense. Our small street of 5 houses uses 3 different providers l Also, has there been any discussion on WEEKLY recycling instead of bi-weekly? Our recycle bin is always overflowing and we are just a family of4. We could easily reduce orn• weekly waste if we had more recycling capacity. 1 Support it Viiien Talghader about 1 month ago Wben Edina switched to single -sort bi-weekly recycling, my family of six was given a small recycling bin that corild really onlybold one week's worth of recycling. l contacted the city and theywere bappy to get me a larger recycling bin. I don't believe that the city advertises this but I'm sire that ifyou were to ask for a larger bin, they would also he happy to accommodate. 1 Support :comment... Reply to Vivien Talghader • (comment... Reply to erin lysen Doro ft Udahl 20 days ago Our neighborhood was recently solicited inpemon or by a flyer, from a 'big business hauler to switch for $43/quarter for the largest container. This is $17 cheaper than the Garbage Man or Vierkant. Trying to rim the little guys out of business? If Edina goes to a city wide pickup or sectional pickup - who will be left to bid . Only the big boys. I have been contacted several times to go back to my previous hauler. The last time for $ 1 0/month. for the largest container. When I asked if everyone was getting the same price, the answer was NO. I believe flys is unethical business practice and is not a company I wish to do business with 0 Supports Wrylathropl8 days ago I lived iaMinneapolis where the city-oontrol ed garbage hauler responded only to the city, not to the residents whose garbage they hauled. There were always problems; messes left, cans in the street, etc. I later lived in Mendota Heights where I could choose any hauler. After having one of the large national haulers whose phone was not answered by a human, I switched to a local hauler and was extremely pleased with both the price (over $100 less per year tbau the national company) and the service. When I moved to Edina three years ago I went with a small, local business... Suburban Waste Services. The phone is answered by a real person....a pleasant person who wants my business. The garbage man neatly places my can back where I can reach it. The garbage haulers' responsibility is to me, and ifthere's a problem and they don't do weal, they know I'll change to a competitor. I doubt I would get the same service with one ofthe big business haulers. Besides, isn't it nice to give business to local, Twin Cities' businesses, especially when ifs cheaper? I really do appreciate having all garbage in one area hauled on the same day. That cuts down on the cans always being in the street. After reading all the comments above by people who dislike several bucks one day, I realize that my pro -local -business view might not prevail If the pro-bigbiisiness lobby manages to change the city policy someday, and have one large company haul the garbage, l hope that the contract is short -one year max ..and up for review each year. But I hope that never happens .... I would bate to see all the friendly, cheaper, local businesses out -gunned by a big boy. 0 Supports comment .. . Reply to Mary Lathrop Sign Up Connec Ismail ail addmss,.. j Sign up Participants • • Speak W, Edina! 4 Home Discussions Sign Yfiiwns • Ideas • Surve Email email address.., _ Password 'password... SlgnIn Like u � .-Twaat Share $+t "ol P I ina! 0 Speak Up, Ed* ✓q (1) We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you r rnr�1tic�w�,� see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal • , 'SHARE your feedback! r POST your ideas! ► JOIN -the discussion! This Discussion charnel is currently closed. Discussion: Organized Garbage Hauling The City wants to learn more about what people think about the organized garbage hauling. Some cities have zoned garbage hauling where there are several baukrs, but one per zone. Some cities even have one garbage bauler for the entire city, whereas Edina allows its residents to choose fi-om a number of licensed haulers. See the topics to weigh in! Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time, By using this online discussion, feedback... 3 Topics 126 Answers Closed 2014-0401 View Discussion Topic: ,Cost The City provides a single recycling bawler, and residents are billed quarterly with their water bills. Would you support a sinilar payment structure? How mach do world you be willing to pay per quarter for City -contracted garbage service? 16 Responses 16 Responses i 0 Michael Braun about] month ago Yes, I like the idea of it being on our water bills. I Ike that the recycling cost went down from $7.50 a quarter to $5.25 and I love the new large mixed - recycling bins. I'm currently paying $42 a quarter far trash only, no organics ( I compost all our organics for our garden) If city wide recycling with once a week pick-up costs $5.25 a quarter, perbaps once a week trash pick-up world cost $10.50 - that would be terrific, it has to be Iess than $40 a quarter! Allow residents to pay extra if they want organics added to their once a week pick-ups. 1 Support ,comment... Reply to Michael Braun Lorenzo Tunest about 1 month ago Yes, I would support a quarterly payment structure for garbage and yard waste. In terms of cost it is all about options. Several sizes (at least 3) ofgarbage cans should be available and options for yard/organic waste should be available as well 1 Support Aft Jordan 01g_enbach adEWn aboutl month ago Lorenzo, providing different bin sizes and trash options is a good point to keep in mind since sometimes, a one -size -fits -all model doesn't work. Thanks for your comment! 0 Supports . comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach comment.... Reply to Lorenzo Tunes - KW S about t month ago I'd prefer a quarterly billing from City of Edina. Price? Since they aRprice out about the same now, would expect sinal ar pricing to what we have, phis hope the City does a good job of negotiating the contracts. 0 Supports f S andv Radek a about 1 mouth ago Do they really price out about the sanow? I cut my trash bill almost in half when I switched from one of the big haulers to Vierkant • me 0 Supports '4. it i 117, 1�e . ♦ �a i jeaboutI inonth ago I experienced price creep once I signed on with two different haulers. When I called around, the prices of the others were about the same- Vierkant was in this group. If your bill was twice as high, not including the promotions they all offer when you switch service, you were paying too mucb. 0 Supports comment. I - — —.- Reply to Sandy Radeke comment... Reply to Kw x DannaDftllaabout1 nionthago I don't want to pay anything for city hauling. Til choose my own garbage hauling service. What kind ofpeople are you to even discuss the city choosing • your personal home choices. Didn't you learn enough with the ridiculous millions of dollar bflce lanes?7? 0 supports VE a Art Wndalais about inonth ago Thark you Donna, finally sorineone with Soule common sense. These busybody local city bureaucrats need to find something else to do with their tune. The next thing you know, the govt will try to tell us what kind ofhealth insurance we have to buy....... I Support continent ... i Reply to Art Vandalais comment... Reply to Donna D'Aquila • SUS ANJOS IIV about i inonth aga We atn currently paying $51 per quarter plus fees and taxes for the smallest can size. I would expect to pay about 340 per quarter if a good contract were negotiated. City billing is the way to go. 0 Supports comment... Reply to SUSAN JEPSEN KOH von Hmdekamofabout I month ago I pay $85 quarterly for a large can AND all compost waste. This includes allyard waste plus all food scrap waste and any paper products. I fmd this very reasonable and the compost/kitcben waste has cut down on my regular garbage tremendously. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Kelli von Heydekampt Patrick Mnlev about 1 month ago I pay $ 85 for garbage and $21 fnr yard waste each quarter. I think this is a We high With negotiation from the city I would expect about $300 per year • for both garbage and yard.comment. Actually is allthe fees that are the killen.- 0 Supports comment .. . -- - -- __--- -- _-__ _ _ ---.__--- --- -- ' Reply to Patrick Finley Art Vandalais about month ago Pm interested in. how Edina will compensate all ofthe homeowners who be forced to breach long term contracts they have with their haulers. I have a locked in commitment of 30 months left with my hauler. If they're are not the anointed hauler, then me and several others in my position will still be liable to pay down our contracts. Secondly, how can a one size fits all model work? Sure you can have different can options but how about frequency? My snow bird neighbors are gone 6 months out of the year, wrll they be forced to buy a service 6 months out of the year when they otherwise wouldn't consume that service? 2 Supports comment_ ------ -- -- - - -- -------.. - ---------= Reply to Art Vandalais kerry kirtida26 days ago • Yes, I support organized gatbage hauling I think a reasonable cost should be 10% lower than what I pay now because by consolidating pickup, the city can hold a competitive bid with a select group of garbage haulers. Lower rates should be negotiated than what an individual household currently pays. To assess a fair monthly/quarterly cost, the city should average what homeowners currently pay, less at least 109/8. 0 Supports comment ... --- _ -.._.. _-..__.._ Reply to kerry kIrAda Bruce 16effer 20 days ago Iles is really bard to comment on since we have no idea what the price would be. What do other cities charge? 1 pay $60 a quarter now for a large cart. 0 Supports Reply to Bruce Kieffer comment... • i kc • Joe Corbett 20 days ago We pay $55/quarter fur for a large cart only. I would expect the city rate to be comparable and offer a -la -carte options like adding/subtracting organics/yard waste as needed. Per other comments, I signed a 4 -year contract and would want to make sine the city would phase this program in or pay early tertnination fees (mine is 6 months, or $110). Overall though, this is a great idea and I hope it happens. When we lived in MSP, the city awarded work to the 4 best bidders and divided the city into a grid. Edina has 4 haulers and could easily divide into quadrants using 62 and 100 as natural grid lines. 1 Support � conuneut .. . -- —- . - — - - -- _.. -- - Reply to Joe Corbett Greg Arnott 18 days ago I suggest reviewing the current garbage hauling rates inthe Cityof S t Louis Park to get an idea ofwbat the charges may be in Edina with city-wide hauling. For those who want to keep the organics option, St. Louis Paris has it so there is rto reason we can't include as an option for Ednra residences. Don't forget the St Louis Park rates include yard waste which in Edina we pay separately. Also your current hauler may not be billing quarterly so you niay not be able to compare the total ofyour current bill to the St. Louis Park quarterly rates. Then the size of the carts iii St Louis Park waynot be the same as • your current service so get out your computers and prepare a little spreadsheet. 0 Supports w' t--7L�;z, o-,,.�L, C',r��-a o t�, iP.l�7�^f► ,� 144, a yp L�-•��-r Gnus-,u.�L /J�.��,'� /��.. �!,�c.�.evv� �,v �)�lu-c�tt�,,,.�-�� pp �66U1 �Yi,1�� T��i�Gtirl,Z t 21� LLs,SZ.L2� lam(/ /Lzr �/� C�Y�, ✓`� �.^^ ¢�r`47/ - `I�� C� OX) 1 - .. ........ .... ....... .. -- r �rn�tr .......... -- d=— - S�rr' — � --�� —"� ��_ �-{c�c�.�-� _ c�_��.� -•cam -�-- - C \ f aa IA/Y i� • 0 Jordan Gilgenbach To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: RE: Organized Solid Waste Collection in Edina From: Don.Krebs <drk62@earthlink.net> Date: March 31, 2014 at 12:57:17 PM CDT To: <JBennerottg@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Organized Solid Waste Collection in Edina Reply -To: Don Krebs <drk62 a,earthlink.net> I couldn't get on to the SpeakUp site, but felt compelled to put my comments into the Mix. I had, previously commented on our neighborhood site and will reiterate those comments here. Please add them in during the City's deliberations,. We live on Naomi Drive. It is street that is one block long between 66th Street and Danen's Drive in Brookview Heights. Every week we have six collection trucks picking up on our block. They include + Vierkant Disposal + Allied Waste + Waste Management + Aspen + SWS + Edina Garbageman vy%T�uu.v� r-aaii�.u.yv{;�+�.uu�, lwJF Vnui a way- : trucks goup one side and down tfie other `side ZE then Dotes: Gollectiori'stkU6 of'77AM-a continue to 2:.PM.-All.of.these.-company's do a greatjob, although I. am,sure.that there are complaints now and then. eSe - - can - -- My career included working for an engineering firm that did collection studies across the country for cites, counties and states. I cannot recall one study over more than 25 years where organized collection did not come out as being cheaper for the customer and the community involved. Considering..£uel burned, wear and teat on streets and.equipment, safety of citizens (accidents happen) and collection workers (a dangerous field of work anyway), neighborhood cleanliness and environmental factors there is really no other direction to go than toward organized collection. There are many options within organized collection, but I prefer a system that involves multiple districts within the City with open bidding to pre -qualified, privately rim. collection funis. Provisions of services to be provided must be established in the bid package along with the method of evaluation to be used for selection. Any bid package should be developed with the ability of collection firms to review and comment before the bid package is approved for bidding. Finally, I want to wish you the best in your evaluations of organized collection. Everyone (including me) likes their "garbage roan" because they almost always do a tough job well. However, the public welfare, use of limited public funds and the overall environment is best served by organizing the City's solid waste collection services. Jordan Gilgenbach From: claire lee <craftyclaireSS@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 9:00 AM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: Re: Speak Up, Edina comments Jordan, Here's my comment on the garbage hauling issue. Thanks for helping me out this morning. I live at the beginning of a long dead end that includes 3 cul-de-sacs. We have at least 6 different garbage hauling companies that come back and forth on our street each week, that doesn't even include the recycling truck. I would love to see some limits set on how manyhaulers can be traveling our neighborhoods. Maybe the city could contract with 2 venders (1 green hauler and 1 regular) and give residents a choice of who they would want to contract with. We would still have a choice and it would cut down on the number of haulers. There could be a 2 yr. contract and then reevaluate the service. Claire Lee On Mar 31, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Jordan Gilgenbach wrote: Hi Claire, If we can't get the online system to work, please feel free to email me your comments directly. Thanks] Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator 952-826-0396 I Fax 952-826-0389 Cell 612-363-35.6.4 <image001.g1jailgenbachCcr�EdinaMN.gov ivww.Ediniim.w v ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6z Doing Business • Jordan Gilgenbach • 0 From: L L ERICKSEN <emmajune4@msn.com> Sent:. Friday, March 14, 2014 4:19 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: Garbage service Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Jordan, Thank you for taking my comments this way and not on the Speak Up, Edinal website: While on one hand 1 think have a single garbage hauler has a lot of merit, I don't think it is the best solution for people like me. I do not have garbage service. Since I live alone, I generate one tall kitchen can of garbage every 3-4 weeks. My neighbor has graciously allowed me to use their service when I need it. I really don't want to pay for way more service than I need or want. While the haulers say they charge by the amount of trash, it assumes you fill at least on large can a week and goes up from there. The.system does not encourage people to cut down on the amount of trash they generate. The strig le sort re c rng provir�e tTi'rough the city contract is fantastic: 1 love it. One problem I have though is yard and tree waste. The county used to allow you to haul it to their drop off slte in the north metro. That has since stopped. I have composted some of it and tagged onto another neighbor, but would prefer the city recycle it as part of the recycling program or provide a drop offsite even if there is a fee. I am not sure why the city did not include it in their recycling program. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. Laura Ericksen 6037 Wooddale Avenue South Laura Ericksen >^..^< EmmaJune4(a)-msn.com Topic: Organize hauling? Do you prefer to choose your garbage hauler, or would you prefer the City hold contracts (like recycling) with haulers so only one garbage hauler would be used per zone or City-wide? Why or why not? Topic: Pros and -Cons of Garbage Hauling What are you biggest concerns if the City were to move to a City -contracted garbage hauler? What are the benefits of keeping it the way it is? -�-t'`-� ..�`-�[.e.J �✓r�.�� .mfr ,mss ./ Fi , .mac-F�f:�. •�+�-� U� `�-t��i � _ - ` r / ,�i'�.i �°.%�-z'J-p2J Topic: Cost The City provides a single recycling hauler, and residents are billed quarterly with their water bills. Would you support a similar payment structure? How much do would you be willing to pay per quarter for City -contracted garba e service? /� � Topic: Organize hauling? Do you prefer to choose your garbage hauler, or would you prefer the City hold contracts (like recycling) with haulers so only one garbage hauler would be used per774ne or City-wide? Why or why not? w/4' ,¢ J Pk 4 J Al .i<i Topic: Pros and Cons of Garbage Hauling What are you biggest concerns if the City were to move to a City -contracted garbage hauler? What are the benefits of keeping it the way it is? xSO - r -77. "Nt- V VI Topic: Cost The City provides a single recycling hauler, and residents are billed quarterly with their water bills. Would you support a similar payment structure? How much do would you be willing to pay per quarter for City -contracted garbage service? 6 AJ CgA e- tt Voicemail received from resident. No name or phone number. Hi, Jordan I'm a resident of Browndale Avenue, and have been a resident for over 40 years. And I'm just responding to the Speak Up, Edina. I really don't want to type a message, I just want to give my opinions. I am so against our government, our local government, our national government taking away our choices. We have a right to make choices, and I am totally happy with my garbage company. I've had it for 40 years and I don't want to change my company and I don't want my city to tell me I have to change my company. It's probably the most dominant hauler within the community here, but I just resent being, our choices being taken away from us. I am so strong on that. So that I hope, I hope that doesn't happen, and I see your asking for people's opinions. Mine is very much against government, or City of Edina telling us who we can choose and who we can't choose. Thanks you very much for listening. Goodbye. CJ :7 Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:07 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; swensonannl@gmail.com; Mary Brindle Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - City Manager's presentation to Richfield School board regarding school boundary change The Edina City Manager made a presentation to the Richfield School board last Monday (June 22) where he made a proposal to change the school boundary between Edina and Richfield public schools (see his presentation video below). Under MN State statue the responsibility of running public schools including school boundary issues is the sole responsibility of Independent school districts. The position of city manager has a MN Statutory job description which does not include anything about making decisions for independent school districts. I would suggest the city manager stay within his job description clearly laid out in MN State statues and not interfere with the business of the Edina School district. This over reach of responsibility by the Edina city manager will be another campaign issue that will be brought up next year during the Edina city elections. David Frenkel City Manager's presentation to Richfield School district - school district boudary change presentation starts at about 22 minutes into presentation https://www.youtu be.co m/watch?v=-xu AV pd M iGQ From the Friday Report from Edina City Manager: Richfield School Board I will make two presentations to the Richfield School Board at its June 22 meeting. The first presentation concerns a proposed small boundary adjustment between the Richfield and Edina school districts in the vicinity of the new 71 France housing development. The second presentation is to share a summary of the many recent and planned economic development projects in the Richfield School District portion of Edina. http://us8.campaign-archive2.com/?u=d26a74d1 a98d6d3253219b5f2&id=5d5b7a67bl &e=a9b4c42d79 Minnesota State Statute on Independent School Districts https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=123B.02 Subdivision 1.Board authority. The board must have the general charge of the business of the district, the school houses; and of the interests of the schools thereof. The board's authority to govern, manage, and control the district; to carry out its duties and responsibilities; and to conduct the business of the district includes implied powers in addition to any specific powers granted by the legislature. Heather Branigin From: Mayors Innovation Project, Satya Rhodes -Conway < Mayors_Innovation_Prc ject_Satya_@mail.vresp.com> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 11:29 AM To: James Hovland Subject: 7 Weeks Away! Summer Meeting, August 13-15 in Des Moines, IA Click to view this email in a browser mayors innovation project 7 Weeks Away! 2015 Summer Meeting August 13 - 15 in Des Moines, IA Learn more, view agenda, and register today. We're just 7 weeks out from our Summer Meeting in Des Moines, IA, peers. and we look forward to seeing you there! At this Summer's meeting we will talk about the important work Des Moines (and other cities) have done on community policing and racial equity, housing, measuring Committee sustainability, and much more. We're honored to announce that the Steering following Mayors will be joining us in August and presenting on the great Mayor Tom - work happening in their city: Berkeley, Mayor Stephen Benjamin Columbia, SC Mayor Benjamin, Columbia SC, will be joining us to discuss policing issues, including - E.,F } community policing and departmental reform. jr Mayor Betsy i„ s a Hodges., Minneapolis, ;�"`' MN Minneapolis is at the national forefront when it comes to sustainability, and Mayor Betsy Hodges will be presenting on how the community measures its environmental, economic and social progress. Learn more about the city's indicators here We hope you can join us. We know you'll learn a lot, and have a great time too! Reserve your • now. International Affairs Cleveland, OH • 0 Satya Rhodes -Conway Managing Director Mayors Innovation Project PS. If you have any questions, please visit www.maVorsinnovation.org or contact our staff at 608-262-5387 or info(o)mayorsinnovation.org. PPS. We invite Mayors, other local elected executive -branch leaders, and their senior staff to attend our meetings, Other elected local government leaders and staff should contact their executive and/or us for an invitation. If you're with an NGO or a business interested in presenting at or sponsoring a meeting, please contact us at i nfo(d-)mayorsin novation.org. Be a part of the conversation on Facebook and Twitter! If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe __....._........ .t Click here to forward this email to a friend Mayors Innovation Project 1180 Observatory Drive Suite 7122 Madison, WI 53706 us Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy. Vertical OELI': F.kEG e'r response Heather Branigin From: Karen Boileau <dreamofjoy@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, lune 26, 2015 11:47 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Tourism Ideas - Karen Boileau 1. 1 have a suggestion to attract tourists to 50th & France as an exciting DESTINATION: To create a European -style plaza during the months of June, July, and August, close off WEEKEND traffic on 50th on the block between France Ave. and the street just west of D'Amicio's. This would allow for expanded dining al fresco, open-air dancing, entertainment, music, shopping and food kiosks, etc. 2. And a suggestion for the large area south of the Edina Liquor Store that would HIGHLIGHT the unique appeal that trains hold for all ages: Create a second story DINING & DANCING DEPOT. On the lower level, tourists and locals could enjoy a Train Museum with imaginative theme -related games and puppet shows. The complex would be surrounded by an area for mini golf with a train -inspired theme. Karen Boileau, M.Ed, 5612 Code Ave. Edina, MN 55436 dreamofiov(@earthlink.net 952-924-0412 1 • Heather Branigin • From: Maher, Maureen A <mmaherl@Fairview.org> Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 2:16 PM To: Trysla, Trudi N; mhoagbel@fairview.com; Beacher, Robert W; Kephart, Kenneth; Herson, Patrick; mlarson@messerliKramer.com; tstoltman@larkinhoffman.com; gchresand@excel.com; phalvor238@gmail.com; Hamel.Mark@dorsey.com; luigi@aurorainvestments.com; smichals@mountdev.com; e.farr@edfararch.com; M.Williamson@edfarrach.com; k.rickabaugh@edfarrarch.com; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmail.com; Chad Millner; Ross Bintner; Cary Teague; Kris Aaker; jilt.levorson@encompassgroup.net; kclayson@a-p.com; dherzberg@a-p.com; sschue@a-p.com; wolson@voa.org; jthorne@voa.org; wisaacson@popearch.com; jschroeder@popearch.com; tpedersen@poparch.com; Imacollins@q.com; kent@cincinnatus.com; dick.howard1950 @gmail.com; smulhere@aol.com; dpaone0l@aol.com; jripley@hallelandhabicht.com; selstads@earthlink.net; thokr@mhscos.com; aaronjohnson@tcomn.com; troysimonson@tcomn.com; kathyfredell@yahoo.com; jonibennettl2@comcast.net; Olson, Sue; Chapa, Mary E Subject: RE: Aurora on France Ground Breaking Celebration on Tuesday Morning, June 30th Good Afternoon - If you have not had the opportunity to RSVP for the Aurora on France Ground Breaking Celebration, please email Maureen Maher at mmaherl CcDfairview.org... thank you. Event Location.- 6500 ocation:6500 France Avenue South in Edina Please arrive by 9:00 a.m. Follow France Avenue to W 65th Street. Head west on W 65th Street and park in the Fairview Southdale ramp. The entrance to the ramp is located on the right hand side of the road across from the building construction site. The event program will be held underneath the tents located on the right hand side of the road; to the left of the parking ramp (right next to Twin Cities Orthopedics and across the street from Cornelia Place Apartments. We hope you are able to join us as we launch this incredible senior living community! The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material, including 'protected health information'. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please destroy and delete this message from any computer and contact us immediately by return e-mail. 0 Heather Branigin From: Ashford, Shelisa - SLAshford <slashford@aarp.org> • Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 2:42 PM To: Ashford, Shelisa - SLAshford Subject: Join Life Reimagined for a Special PBS Event Attachments: LR_25367_LR-PBS Event-Invite_f.r4.pdf YOU ARE i INVITED 6 t /aTw w Living with Purpose**" Pp y f i'. t .�t!'.,;tta �,.{.:�. r�,.>r-F F'�f;: Ei{ n , fi'`,ir`�il -..'� �S"J•;'9eT'� ;;€''� 'W% : 'D I.. A, - 11 `.a::. 's :. t.: i` .34., %111 1 . F:( ;.a!a :rat E",. E .S:{'' ,y I' .•rir Ea !: � ':.a t'�; � { P'i i-...'� .,l , f'.I iN, !).� {' ,.' f is .. si '`A �' �l'f :�!. 1•.�.f Vis•.. 1 3 I,. t. i 44. j , Unitedllea icxam. 0PTU YOU ARE I NVITE D to Attend a PBS Special Taping of "Living with Purpose" featuring Richard Leider . Wednesday, July 8, 2015. 6:30 p.m. The History Theatre 30 East 10th Street • St. Paul, MN 55101 Join us for an evening of inspiration, wisdom and passionate • storytelling. As a part of the select studio audience, you'll get a sneak peak at the filming of the upcoming national PBS special featuring Richard Leider bestselling author of The Power of Purpose, Repacking Your Bags, and Life Reimagined. Following the taping, we invite you to attend an exclusive VIP reception with Richard Leider himself. Support for Life Reimagined is provided by UnitedHealtheare° 44 OPTUM" RSVP to Shelisa Ashford by July 2nd at slashford(aaarp.org or (202) 434-2243. Parking only at 7A Municipal Ramp at 13 West Exchange Street, St. Paul, MN 55102 will be reimbursed. >�orywR This ramp is connected by skyway to the History Theatre. Request parking voucher at the theatre prior to the performance. www.historytheatre.com Living with Purpose featuring Richard Leider (wt) is a production of Twin Cities Public Television (TPT), and is made possible in part by support from PBS. Deb Mancien From: Scott H. Neal • Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 8:34 AM To: 'Common Sense Edina'; James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; swensonannl@gmail.com; Mary Brindle Subject: RE: Common Sense for Edina - City Manager's presentation to Richfield School board regarding school boundary change Mr. Frenkel — I spoke to the Richfield School Board, at the invitation of their Superintendent, on a matter of mutual concern. That matter is the district boundary line that runs through the middle of two newly constructed residential buildings at 71 France. If the boundary issue remains unchanged, it will complicate the lives of these new residents when it comes to issues such as voting and the new property owner when it comes to assessing the building for tax valuation. I have been invited to make a similar presentation to the Edina School Board by their Superintendent on the same issue. There is nothing illegal, improper or inappropriate about what I am doing on this matter. If you would like to discuss the matter with me directly, I'd be happy to meet with you at a time and place of mutual convenience. Regards, I-\ Scott H. Neal, City Manager $r� r - 952-826-0401 1 Fax 952-826 0390 M sneal5EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business Read my bloq or follow me on Twitter. • From: Common Sense Edina[ma iIto: commonsenseforedina(aOgmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 9:07 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; swensonannIO)gmail.com; Mary Brindle Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - City Manager's presentation to Richfield School board regarding school boundary change The Edina City Manager made a presentation to the Richfield School board last Monday (June 22) where he made a proposal to change the school boundary between Edina and Richfield public schools (see his presentation video below). Under MN State statue the responsibility of running public schools including school boundary issues is the sole responsibility of Independent school districts. The position of city manager has a MN Statutory job description which does not include anything about making decisions for independent school districts. I would suggest the city manager stay within his job description clearly laid out in MN State statues and not interfere with the business of the Edina School district. This over reach of responsibility by the Edina city manager will be another campaign issue that will be brought up next year during the Edina city elections. David Frenkel City Manager's presentation to Richfield School district - school district boudary change presentation starts at about 22 minutes into presentation https://www.youtube_com watch?v—XuAVpdMiGQ 0 • From the Friday Report from Edina City Manager: Richfield School Board I will make two presentations to the Richfield School Board at its June 22 meeting. The first presentation concerns a proposed small boundary adjustment between the Richfield and Edina school districts in the vicinity of the new 71 France housing development. The second presentation is to share a summary of the many recent and planned economic development projects in the Richfield School District portion of Edina, http://us8.campaign-archive2.com/?u=d26a74dl a98d6d3253219b5f2&id=5d5b7a67bl &e=a9b4c42d79 Minnesota State Statute on Independent School Districts https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=1 23B.02 Subdivision 1.Board authority. The board must have the general charge of the business of the district, the school houses, and of the interests of the schools thereof. The board's authority to govern, manage, and control the district; to carry out its duties and responsibilities; and to conduct the business of the district includes implied powers in addition to any specific powers granted by the legislature. 0 0 MALKERSON GUNN MARTIN LLP 1 900 U.S. BANK PLAZA SOUTH TOWER 220 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 555402 TELEPHONE 612-344- 1 1 1 1 FACSIMILE 612-344- 14 14 Bruce D. Malkerson Direct Dial No. 612.344.1699 Email: bruce.malkersonr.msmllp.com June 30, 2015 Members of Metropolitan Council 390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101-1805 Members of Southwest LRT Corridor Management Committee RE: Additional Reasons Why the Proposed Southwest Light Rail Transit Line Should Not Be Extended to the West of I-494 at This Time Dear Honorable Members of the Metropolitan Council and the Southwest LRT Corridor • Management Committee: The undersigned represents Redstone American Grill, Inc., ("Redstone") which owns and operates the Redstone restaurant at 8000 Eden Road, City of Eden Prairie. The restaurant is adjacent to Lake Idlewild and a public trail system around the lake that is used by the patrons of Redstone (and many others) as shown on Exhibit 1. The Metropolitan Council's SWLRT Project Office is completing a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement ("SDEIS") which was to address omissions and problems in the initial Draft Environmental Impact Statement for some additional alternatives that are now being considered. As we are all aware, the SWLRT project is substantially over budget, and the Metropolitan Council is looking for ways to scale back the project so that it can be built at an acceptable cost. We believe there are a number of good reasons, which have been articulated by others, as to why the SWLRT line should stop at the Golden Triangle Station and should not be extended beyond 1-494 at this time. By not extending the SWLRT line beyond the Golden Triangle Station, the Metropolitan Council will save all of the costs of extending the line further west, including the costs of constructing a bridge over I-494 and the costs of acquiring through condemnation the numerous properties that must be acquired if the line is to be extended beyond the Golden Triangle Station. Because we have not retained experts to analyze the construction costs that others have provided to you relating to extending the SWLRT line beyond the Golden Triangle Station, we will only note that it is very rare for the construction of this type and size of a project to come within the budget (including the contingency amounts established) that was • 177676.DOCX • Members of Metropolitan Council Members of Southwest LRT Corridor Management Committee June 30, 2015 Page 2 approved for the project when the project was first ordered even though those costs may have been analyzed many times. We can speak with more experience as to our belief that the costs of acquisition, as estimated by the consultants for the condemning authority, in such projects are always substantially below the final cost of such acquisitions. Consultants for the condemning authority virtually never understand the impact of a total condemnation of a property and a business, or the cost to relocate the business, or the impact in partial condemnation cases on the value of the property taken and the consultants never understand the full extent of the severance damages to the remaining property and business. We believe you should plan that those estimated costs could be double or triple what your consultants say those costs will be. As you work to scale back this project to bring it within acceptable cost limits, you should also increase the estimated costs for condemnation and land acquisition and business relocation to make them more realistic than the current estimates are. In addition to the above reasons for not extending the SWLRT line beyond I-494 at this • time is the fact that the DEIS has failed to address important environmental considerations relating to that portion of the line. On behalf of Redstone, we have retained Westwood Surveying and Engineering, P.C. ("Westwood"), which has studied the SDEIS and has provided the preliminary comments in a memo dated June 30, 2015 that is enclosed with this letter. As can be seen, some of the problems relate to the following: a. The noise impacts of the SWLRT project as currently designed will destroy the natural quietude of the Redstone property and its surroundings. b. The current SWLRT project design does not account for, or even acknowledge, the severe adverse impact that the project will have upon the public trail that is adjacent to Lake Idlewild and is identified in the 2013 Trail Plan of the City of Eden Prairie. c. The current SWLRT project design does not account for, or even acknowledge, the severe adverse impact that the project will have upon the future public park planned for the area to the west of Lake Idlewild and identified in City's 2030 Comprehensive Guide Plan. d. The current SWLRT project design would cause significant problems for both customers and management of the Redstone restaurant. 177676.DOCX Members of Metropolitan Council Members of Southwest LRT Corridor Management Committee June 30, 2015 Page 3 Due to the substantial adverse impact on the natural resources on and adjacent to the Redstone property, Redstone has authorized us to bring a Minnesota Environmental Rights Action ("MERA"), Minn. Stat. § 11613.01, et seq., against this project in the event that it extends beyond I-494. Such an extension of the project would adversely impact, among other natural resources, Lake Idlewild, the existing public trail system around Lake Idlewild, and the natural beauty and quietude of the Redstone property and its immediate surroundings. As you may know, MERA creates a cause of action to "protect, preserve, and enhance" the "natural resources of the State." State v. Minneapolis Park & Rec. Bd., 673 N.W.2d 169, 174 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004), citing Minn. Stat. § 11613.02, subd. 4. Historic, scenic, aesthetic resources and "quietude" are included within the definition of "natural" resources. In order to establish a prima facie MERA claim, the claimant must first show the existence of a protectable resource. Id., citing State v. Erickson, 285 N.W.2d 84, 87 (Minn. 1979). The claimant must then show that the proposed project may inflict a material adverse effect on the protectable resource. Id., at 175, citing Minn. Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun Club, 257 N.W.2d 762, 768 (Minn. 1977). If the project proposer is unable to rebut the claimant's prima facie MERA case, it may show by way of an affirmative defense that there is "no feasible and prudent alternative and the conduct at issue is consistent with and reasonably required for promotion of the public health, safety, and welfare...." State v. County of Blue Earth, 563 N.W.2d 260, 264 (Minn. 1997), citing Minn. Stat. § 11613.04. Here, the scenic and recreational attributes of the Redstone property and its immediate surroundings plainly constitute a "natural resource" as defined by MERA. Moreover, there is no question but that the SWLRT project as currently designed will inflict a material adverse effect on these natural resources for the reasons identified and described in the memo prepared by Westwood and submitted with this letter. Accordingly, Redstone will be able to successfully establish a prima facie MERA case against the SWLRT, and the Metropolitan Council must then try to establish that "no feasible and prudent alternative" to the current SWLRT route exists. It is apparent that the Metropolitan Council will be unable to establish this, however, since, for example, the Metropolitan Council is now considering as an alternative a SWLRT route that would terminate at the Golden Triangle Station without extending beyond 1-494. Such a route is certainly feasible, and is particularly "prudent" in light of the intense budget constraints that currently afflict the SWLRT project. Thus, it seems highly unlikely that the Metropolitan Council could prevail in a MERA case under these circumstances. As the Metropolitan Council is surely aware from the two pending lawsuits concerning the SWLRT project, potential liability under MERA is not the only legal deficiency from which the SWLRT project design suffers. In addition to the avoidable and adverse impacts of the SWLRT project on the MERA-protected natural resources that surround the Redstone property, the Metropolitan Council also failed to properly account for the public trail system around Lake • 177676.DOCX • • 0 Members of Metropolitan Council Members of Southwest LRT Corridor Management Committee June 30, 2015 Page 4 Idlewild in the SWLRT planning and design process, as required by Section 4(0 of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303(c). There is already a pending lawsuit against the Metropolitan Council arising from a similar deficiency in the Metropolitan Council's planning process relating to another segment of the SWLRT route. See Opus Woods Conservation Association, et al, v. Metropolitan Council, 15 -CV -01637 (D. Miim.). Redstone has authorized us to assert similar claims against the Metropolitan Council on behalf of Redstone in the event the SWLRT line is extended beyond I-494 to the Redstone property. Although the environmental review process for the SWLRT project is still underway, the Metropolitan Council has also thus far failed in its obligation under the National Envirolunental Policy Act ("NEPA"), 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq., to properly consider the significant envirolunental effects of the SWLRT project. The Metropolitan Council's failure to do so concerning other segments of the SWLRT route is one of the bases of the Opus Woods Conservation Association lawsuit referenced above. It is also one of the bases of the other pending federal court SWLRT- related lawsuit against the SWLRT. See Lakes and Parks Alliance of Minneapolis v. Federal Transit Administration ("FTA'), Metropolitan Council, 14 -CV -03391 (D. Minn.). Redstone has authorized us to assert similar claims against the Metropolitan Council on behalf of Redstone. By modifying the currently proposed SWLRT route so that it terminates at the Golden Triangle Station, the Metropolitan Council can meet the budgetary challenges that the SWLRT project has encountered while at the same time avoiding the severe impacts on protected natural resources and avoiding the severe economic impacts of the currently proposed SWLRT route upon Redstone and similarly situated businesses in Eden Prairie. We therefore urge that the Metropolitan Council take the necessary action to modify the SWLRT route in this way by not extending it across I-494 as it is currently planned. Very truly yours, Q25JUMs� 1b. Bruce D. Malkerson Bradley J. Gu Governor Mark Dayton (Via Facsimile) Mayor and City Council, City of Eden Prairie (allcouncil(uedenprairie.org) 177676.DOCX x H H H N D: End at Town. Center Station(Flying Cloud) TECHNOLOGY DRIVE ._ ° '"�+.�,► . r� • �+ - 191 x LAKE 1 • jz� ._ aP .. � r EDEN PRAIRIE TOWN CENTER n r.e*„ SCENARIO D G •F�Fti o - LLI W II a r 1 or . w • ' � ' 1. - _ .acs•-., „,....+-..Q* 6 a� Y �� ' • EDEN �, `C ,• n, N. PRAIRIE t _ %tx �� " `..ems CE _y HOPKINS ST LOUIS PARK i MINNEAPOLIS SOUTHWEST • 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 od Fax (952) 937-5150 We YY ��ii Fax (952) 937-5822 ✓destwoodps.com (888) 937-5150 MEMO Date: June 30, 2015 From: Tom Goodrum, Senior Planner To: Craig Oberlander, Redstone American Grill, Inc. Bruce Malkerson, Attorney at Law Bradley Gunn, Attorney at Law RE: Town Center Station Re -location Options, Eden Prairie Segment As I am preparing our comments regarding the SDEIS of the Eden Prairie Segment (west of Highway 494) for Redstone America Grill, Inc. there is a second concurrent conversation occurring on cost savings for the SWLRT line. While the SDEIS contains significant problems for the Redstone Restaurant located at 8000 Eden Road, Eden Prairie, which we will address during the review period, the immediate concern is the potential re -location or deferring of the Town Center Station. At this time it is my understanding that the • SWLRT Project Office is considering the options of possibly re -locating the Town Center Station closer to the Redstone Restaurant (cither to the east or directly in front of the property) or deferring the Station and ending the SWLRT line at the Golden Triangle Station east of Highway 494. • Redstone Restaurant is negatively impacted with the proposed SWLRT line, but moving the Town Center Station in front of the property as now being considered would be a much greater adverse impact to Redstone and their patrons. If the decision is to extend the line across Highway 494 then the line should stop at the site immediately to the east of the Redstone Restaurant. The negative impacts that I have noted during my review of the SDEIS that support our concerns are as follows: Public Trails Around Lake Idlewild The SDEIS does not recognize the public trail that exists along Lake Idlewild. This trail is noted in the City's 2013 Trail Plan and should be analyzed in the document. Although it may not qualify for 4(f) designation, it does qualify as public open space and a noise sensitive area. Adding a station would further increase the impacts on people enjoying the trail due to the added noise and visual impacts. Future Town Center Park, west of Lake Idlewild In addition, the SDEIS does not identify that the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows a future public park west of Lake Idlewild. Since a future public park is proposed for this area, it should be analyzed in the SDEIS with added studies of how the proposed LRT would impact the public enjoyment of that park. The added noise, including bells and horns, plus the visual impacts should be addressed for this park in a similar fashion as was done for Purgatory Park in the SDEIS study. Multi -Disciplined Surveying & Engineering TEPLS Finn No 1007:302 Westwood Ps. corn Westwood May 5th, 2015 • Page 2 Pedestrian/Vehicle Safety With the Town Center Station proposed as a pedestrian friendly station and the local businesses continuing to need to serve vehicle supported patrons, there will be many people mixed with the vehicles in the area. There are several roads converging at this juncture and the location of a station will only increase the frequency of potential accidents. Noise impact at Redstone There are three (3) at grade crossings plus the proposed station near Redstone (Flying Cloud Drive, Glen Lane, Eden Road) where bells will be sounded by the train at each crossing gate for 5 seconds and when enteringlexiting the station plus each gate will ring bells for 20 second intervals when a train approaches. There may also be the use of the train's hone just east of the property. With trains passing/or stopping every 10 minutes, there would be a very limited amount of time when patrons would enjoy quiet dining, especially at the outdoor seating over -looking Lake Idlewild. Access to Redstone The trains will be crossing/stopping in front of the restaurant's two -accesses every 10 minutes. It is not shown in the SDEIS that if a train stops at either Glen Lane or Eden Road would the train be blocking Redstone accesses. If it does, it will limit the ability of customers to enter or exit the site. If a Station is placed in front of Redstone, there would be a greater impact. Cost of Project Per the June 25`x' Project Office power point to the Met Council, ending the line at Town Center narrowly achieves the 341 million cost savings needed. The deferring of the Town Center Station would substantially reduce the cost of the project when you factor in the cost of building a bridge over Highway 494 and the added road improvements and rail construction between Golden Triangle Station and Town Center Station. The cost savings from deferring the Town Center Station would allow the reduction of • cost cuts otherwise needed in other significant areas of the project. Although there are many other impacts that Redstone will be commenting on as part of the SDEIS review, the consequence of relocating Town Center Station in front of Redstone does require our immediate attention. The deferring of the Town Center Station or placing the Station to the east and ending the line to the east would eliminate the many concerns that significantly impact the Redstone Restaurant and adversely impact the natural resources of the area. 0 E 0 0 +he-- end c) f fke I RSP airport f-onwws T live, if) hlAway Ion f- 62 c1rossfown � J_ I area, Iver - single dai i awake, be_-� vevn Ovef- 0 I ..f nLe;Ober ho-odsVniery Clay C, J) then ovit)5___ A-na+ wake-up I+s 18 Sfraiqbf outs Of fc&too off—o-y-er -our c► one 4f4et of be'r, JhE_ _5 +A) k Q W4e_ ql have, OQY)5 +0 Gari+ i6kf, 7bt L go A -a a �af1-4 1 9-0—Of Q�tCq i0hes� 69 Off, The 50ubj--1S -5c> b -kersomak 'i n e d i nq lhkf I i Y'n - q hem re, on oJi-on T� have lived krr, ve-c—Ir-S �e, alqatt builf so .96"es-,_ cold _k, - off— nve f cl attir. '1r\6lAqi area called -tie_ Nlmt,5c)lq_ r IOA-Cl- iev, - 5 'Of J' OU54AJ_5 rlQhf avec oor netibborAood-, (A eaJACI n OW i S -CCA-5448f Cl iP ICIU, 0 I to i�.50MOnp_ In 7k�6 rView 50Jbia VG I 01-jc" - - cr C K, C) p A" 10 fill cirl "Ow (-C)VI6 YOU lie+ +ki5 �vft),l hc>y-f�Df- )0nq rte, dmf C)o D iY__ Yne—,*Of- Al [Al Deb Manaen From: Daniel Schleck <DSchleck@hallelandhabicht.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:00 PM To: David Fisher; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland Cc: rob@capstonelawmn.com; calvinjohnsonii3@gmail.com; melanie,johnson@comcast.net Subject: RE: 4220 Alden Dr Attachments: imagejpeg; Video.mov; imagejpeg Mr. Fisher— Thank you for your email. Can you please share a copy of this letter with me? Let me know if I need to make a formal data practices request. Additionally, we are requesting that you immediately make an inspection of the Property in question and stop all work because the builder violated your initial order from last week by: i) expanding the work conducted beyond the construction of the shoring wall; ii) by trespassing onto my client's property without an agreement or an easement; and iii) continuing to trespass onto my clients' property with the improperly placed boulder wall. The retaining wall is being built across the property line on my client's property without any easement, this does not comply with Edina City ordinances, particularly Ordinances 10-110(3) and 10-112. My clients' revoked any access to our property because of TC Homebuilders continued violations of its promises. The property line was marked by TC Homebuilders' own surveyor and they continue to trespass and the City must stop it. See the attached photos. Please let me know what you are doing about this issue. My clients' will protect their property rights by utilizing the equitable power of the courts. If the builder is allowed to continue he will try to finish quickly and move on and make it the homeowners problem after he leaves. The City must act now. HALLELAND HABICHT Daniel Schleck Halleland Habicht PA dschleck@liallel andhabi cht. com 612-836-5531 Download Dan's VCARD From: David Fisher [mailto:DFisher(d)EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:02 AM To: Daniel Schleck Cc: tony(atchomebuildersinc.com Subject: 4220 Alden Dr Mr. Schleck, I received a letter from a MN Registered P.E. this morning, inspected it the work per the letter, called the P.E. and I lifted the stop work order. 0 Just an FYI. David Fisher, Chief Building Official €r $ 952-826-04501 Fax 952-826-0389 Lk DFlsher(ZDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov uy ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business Tell us how we're doing! Take our customer satisfaction survey. 6A Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Think Green! PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE -This message and any attachments are intended for the named recipient(s) only and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or authorized to receive for the recipient, you are notified that dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by calling (612) 836-5500 or replying to this e-mail. Please delete the message and any attachments. • 0 .. �. ..,.._.-ti-- �� ..� ._ .�.-w�----- .�,--_- �'� • July 1, 2015 To: The Edina City Council From: Stephanie Mullaney Chair, Public Grandview Subject: Why is the City Council Against Fitness and Recreation for our Community? This packet is a response to the June 17 Edina City Council meeting with respect to the presentation of the proposed Parks Board Strategic Plan. I respectfully request that you review this information before making any decisions about modifying the proposed plan to fit your current plans for Grandview. The packet addresses two main areas: 1. Comments about the meeting, plan recommendations and how the strategic plan affects the current Grandview process. 2. The strategic plan's underlying data. The documents within the packet summarize the information in the first b sections of the proposed strategic plan. • The following documents are provided in conjunction with items 1 and 2, above: ■ Observations related to June 17 Council meeting (Item 1) ■ Strategic plan observations and implementation comments (Item 1) ■ Where is the Edina City Council Going with Grandview and WHY? (Item 1) • Should We Build a Community Center? (Item 2) Let's Look at the Underlying Data from the Strategic Plan A matrix of the underlying data in the proposed strategic plan ■ Should We Build a Community Center? (Item 2) Let's Look at the Edina Parks and Recreation Vision and Mission Vision, mission, guiding principles, purpose of strategic plan and why the plan is important ■ Should We Build a Community Center? (Item 2) Let's Look at the Strategic Plan Recommendations Recommendations or key findings in the plan ■ Should We Build a Community Center? (Item 2) Let's Look at a Summary of Issues in the Strategic Plan Key points in the plan in a summary format Thank you for your consideration. 40 Stephanie Mullaney OBSERVATIONS ON THE JUNE 17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ■ The strategic plan was received well with the exception of the section that proposes building a community recreation and fitness center. ■ It appeared that certain Council members' purpose was to discredit the recreation and fitness information presented by Confluence. The recreation and fitness section does not fit this Council's vision and the plans you have for Grandview. ■ Mayor Hovland stated that the underlying data needs to be examined and that the data most likely won't support building a recreation center. ■ At least one member had not read the presentation. ■ The only issue in the Plan that was refuted or questioned was the community fitness/rec center. ■ Questions were asked that reflected a lack of knowledge about the Community Needs Assessment that was completed in November 2014. } Questions were asked reflecting that members did not understand the difference between the Community Needs Assessment and the benchmark studies. In making a decision about a community recreation/fitness center (i.e. community • center), the report took the following into consideration: ■ What the public wants ■ How Edina rates with respect to its peers ■ The national trends and facts ■ Edina's trends and facts If Edina wishes to compete as a premiere community, the decision to build a community center should be based on the above criteria, not whether a community center fits into the Council's personal visions and plans for Grandview. As a resident who is paying close attention to the Grandview process, I am concerned that the Council will update the proposed strategic plan to remove the community center— not based on data, or what the community wants or needs, but rather, on the Council member's personal preferences and relationships with developers. 0 • STRATEGIC PLAN OBSERVATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMENTS The following issues should be considered with respect to implementation of the Strategic Plan. There are references to beefing up Edinborough to act as a community center. Edinborough is not a good location for a community center for the following reasons: o Location —it is not centrally located and is not easily accessible. o Location - it is near the YMCA — and it would be "competing" with private enterprise — exactly what the Council has stated they don't want to do. If the Council intends to upgrade recreation in Edinborough, and have the YMCA manage or run the facility, they do not understand the concept of a community - owned and based recreation center (see below). o Location —the majority of recreation capital expenditures have been invested south of Highway 62. Note the recent and upcoming Braemar dome and golf improvements at about $20M. A community center at Grandview would help with the lack of geographical equity that was pointed out in the study. • o Location: Edinborough is located in an area that does not have a concentration of young families. If the intention is to make the facility multi -generational, this location makes little sense. o It is an unwelcoming building — not a modern fitness facility that recreation and fitness users expect. ■ In contrast, Grandview is an ideal site for a community center: 0 25 of Edina's 43 neighborhoods are north of Crosstown. o The neighborhoods with the best balance of residents that the Strategic Plan targets for a community center (youth and seniors over 55) are north of Crosstown. o The most neighborhoods with population aged 0 to 14 are north of Crosstown: 15 of the 21 neighborhoods at or above the median. Expressed another way, 15 of 21 neighborhoods with the most children ages 0-14 are north of Crosstown. o Neighborhoods with the most residents over 55 are evenly split (10 neighborhoods are north of Crosstown, 10 are south) 0 Strategic Plan Observations and Implementation, continued The chosen benchmark communities are not a good selection of peer communities. Cities such as Eden Prairie, Minnetonka and St. Louis Park are more similar to Edina than Plymouth and Maple Grove. That being said, Edina is seriously lagging behind the selected benchmark communities with respect to a community center. There have been repeated comments by the Council that all the data, meetings and social media input about Grandview are a reflection of the same small group of Edina residents, over and over again. This strategic plan dispels that notion. No members of Public Grandview or Citizens for a Better Grandview were part of the focus groups or the Community Needs Assessment. ■ Partnerships? With regard to seeking additional partnerships (p 45), where is the data to support this proposition? There is no evidence that the community wants their parks and recreation run by for-profit or non-profit partners. In my previous document, A True Community Center (see http://bit.ly/1 FuTlpd page 11), there is comparison of the traits of a public recreation/fitness center versus a private for-profit center. The community should run a community center. A local example, Minnetonka's Williston facility, rejected outside partners due to their non -alignment with the community's goals and objectives. For example, one of the city's goals was for Minnetonka to be a good place for families. Because Williston is a city -managed facility, it aligned its building and programming to cater to families; as a result, family memberships grew from 25% to 50% of the total membership in a community whose demographics are very close to Edina's. Examine how closely Minnetonka's demographics align with Edina's in 2010 census data: Total population 2010 Percentage under 5 yrs. Percentage under 18 yrs. Percentage 65 yrs. and over Minnetonka Edina 49,734 47,941 5.4% 4.9% 20.8% 24.2% 16.7% 20.7% 0 • Strategic Plan Observations and Implementation, continued ■ Transportation? In the strategic plan on page 121, Proposed Trail Network, there is no trail near or connected to • Grandview in the parks' network. According to the Framework, Grandview's vision included a multi -modal transportation site - including a -,P' transportation hub that was bike -able. ■ Programming? The proposed strategic plan has strong recommendations with respect to recreational and fitness programming and facilities for Edina. • How do those recommendations sync with the current Grandview planning? o Where is the data to support the current Grandview plans for a performing arts center? The current programming plans call for items that the Council favors personally, not based on data. Performing arts centers lose money. There is no market failure for performing arts centers — there are centers in nearby communities (that are losing money). o Page 62 of the Plan states that Edina is not lagging behind other communities for performing arts: This comparison is significant due to the development taking place at Grandview, and general perception among residents that there is not enough performing arts spaces currently available in the City of Edina. Based on the table below, Edina is on par among benchmark agencies for performing/visual arts centers. o The Council has stated they don't want to lose money on a fitness center. The Edina Art Center loses money each year and has an attendance number of roughly 4500 visits. The Minnetonka Art Center, a focused, well-run center gets about 10,000 visits per year. Typical community centers have attendance rates in the hundreds of thousands. 0 Strategic Plan Observations and Implementation, continued o What specific programming does the Council intend on putting in the multi- generational space? What types of activities are shared by generations beyond fitness that occur on a daily basis? These popular activities (walking, running, jogging, etc.) also have appeal because of their social advantages. For example, although fitness activities are mainly self-directed, people enjoy walking and biking with other individuals because it can offer a degree of camaraderie. (page 66) Flex space calls for scheduled activities, which are not congruent with the current national trends: Because of the pressures on time, people are seeking activities and infrastructure that are close to home and easily accommodated in their typical schedules. (page 23) A local architect characterized flex space as designed as a catchall for everything and therefore, usable for nothing. • • WHERE IS EDINA CITY COUNCIL GOING WITH GRANDVIEW AND WHY? The proposed Parks Strategic plan reflects what Citizens for a Better Grandview has said for years and what Public Grandview ascertained recently. Edina lacks a community fitness and recreation facility that the public wants and that the Edina of the future needs. ■ Public Grandview's assertions are supported by data and facts. ■ The Council's assertions are not supported by data and appear to be influenced by personal preferences and relationships with developers. Maybe we are out of step, out of harmony with the community because they think this is really the way we ought to be going. I am not convinced of that. I am not convinced of that. We have all heard this the last 2 or 3 years. - Mayor Hovland speaking of community center— June 17 meeting What has the council heard? Where is the data about what they have heard? • What data supports the current programming approach? In the course of my work on Public Grandview, I have never received any data that supports the various claims of the Council concerning feedback that citizens want to sell Grandview and privatize it. On the contrary, Public Grandview has supplied the Council with hundreds of pages of documents that contain data showing public support for a new community center. The proposed strategic plan is additional evidence supporting Public Grandview's assertions: 2. PROVIDE A MULTI -GENERATIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER THAT IS ALL-INCLUSIVE. Acommunity center need was identified in the community survey and the Level of Service Analysis. A facility of this type would fill multiple needs including the creation of community meeting and gathering spaces, provide a space for the multiple generations and their ability to interact, and supporting recreation (page 224) activities and users that are currently under -served. The City will need to study the programmatic, spatial, and amenity requirements of the facility. The Grandview • site has been identified as a potential location for this facility and would provide a much needed community gathering facility north of highway 62. Should we Build a Community Center? Let's Look at Underlying Data from the Strategic Plan Public Input Benchmarking National Trends Edina Trends A TIV I M. National obesity tren s are shifting as the general public becomes more the Department should expect residents to educated and is engaging in active lifestyles participate fitness activities ata much higher throughout all age groups. Health insurance rate than the national average. This would NOTE: Includes focus groups, community Edina is leader in park acreage per resident, in providers and health care workers are actively educating the public in the benefits of active indicate that the Department should offer a wide workshopand community survey P 9 providing ice sheet facilities. P 10 P g lifestyles, and health and recreation centers are varietyof fitnessprogramming,with a willingness seeing increased memberships and use. As a to introduce innovative and trending activities. result, the general public is demanding facilities P10 and programs that support healthier lifestyles. P 23 Walking, running, and biking are becoming more popular as both recreation activities and methods of transportation. These methods of From an infrastructure standpoint, EPRD should Indoor fitness facility is desired by community Edina lags behind other benchmark communities transportation require necessary infrastructure look to provide facilities that accommodate and includingwalking and in track and indoor g jogging in indoor recreation space. P 10 that has historical) not been a priority in this first y P � encourage this socialization, which corresponds g P pool. P 9/10 ring suburb. Supporting these individuals with to many other initiatives in the City that strive to appropriate infrastructure is a key function of further building community. P 11 EPRD and can go a long way toward building a healthier community. P 23 EDINA TODAY: However, if Edina is to become ACTIVE AGING: Edina has a growing population recognized as one of the best park systems in the Because of the pressures on time, people are over the age of 55. In 2014 nearly 35% cf the Community engagement for this project was State, there are some things to address in the seeking activities and infrastructure that are dose to home and easily accommodated in their population is above age 55 and that number is projected to be approximately 45% by 2019. carefully planned in order to accurately capture present, And trends that will need to be typical schedules. Unstructured participation Many individuals in an aging population are all major community needs and included addressed in the future. Edina is lagging behind activities that meet busy schedules and allow seeking changes in lifestyle to reflect their lack of conducting focus groups, public workshops, a other communities In some key areas including them to engage with their family, friends, and child-care responsibilities, reduced work loads, statistically -valid community survey. P 42 indoor community/ recreation space, a community are highly desired. This will require a and expanded recreational, educational, and comprehensive trail system, and number and flexible park system with facilities and programs cultural interests. P 21 variety of aquatic facilities. P 40 that include options that fit multiple needs. P 23 Focus group participants mentioned theEdina is aging at a notable VIBRANTYOUTH: following amenities or services are in short supply pace and the City's current recreation While current sports associations are excellent at or missing: infrastructure and programs are not geared teaching important active lifestyle lessons, Recreation / community centers toward this aging population. Changes and The most popular activity for Americans over 45 diversifying the activities and supporting a Gymnasium space adaptations will be necessary to address this is exercise walking. It will be important to ensure broader range of interests will attract a larger ADA accessibility and inclusive design for issue. A comprehensive multi -use trail network that aging citizens of Edina have access to youth population that may be underserved by parks/facilities and indoor community/ recreation space are amenities that fit their needs. P 33 traditional parks and recreation facilities and . Fitness centers and programming potential priority projects that could help the activities. P21 .Multi -generational programming City address these gaps in the present and future. P44 P 40 0 0 0 Public Input Benchmarking National Trends Edina Trends The perception is that the majority of Edina's Using data from the Community Profile ACCESSIBILITY FOR ALL: parks and Analysis, combined with analysis found TRENDS: MOST POPULAR SPORT AND REC Lower mobility, aging populations will greatly facilities are dominated by organized youth throughout the Strategic Plan will help EPRD i ACTIVITIES: Fitness walking, running/logging, benefit from an approach that emphasizes sports. Residents would create a new level of excellence for the City that treadmill. MOST PARTICIPATED IN TEAM SPORTS: accessibility for all, and will allow the EPRD to like more spaces within the parks that incorporate will likely allow recognition from the Commission Basketballtennis, baseball. P 66 provide health and wellness opportunities to all arts and culture, passive recreation, and for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies of Edina's residents. P22 community. P 44 (CAPRA). P 40 Most popular fitness walking, treadmill, running/ ogging, free weights, bicycling. Most of these activities appeal to both young and old There are two prominent features from the alike, can be done in most environments, are demographic analysis for the Department to COMMUNITY WORKSHOP Descriptive words: - Edina Parks & Rec Department (EPRD) is not enjoyed regardless of level of skill, and have focus on for the future: the aging trend and the common descriptions for the future included: all accredited by CAPRA and has never won an minimal economic barriers to entry. These elevated earnings of the service area. The local ages, multi-purpose, community center. p47 NRPA Gold Medal award. P 54 popular activities also have appeal because of trends are also very promising, as the city's their social advantages. For example, although residents demonstrate high market potential fitness activities are mainly self-directed, people index figures for many of the activities related to enjoy walking and biking with other individuals parks and recreation. P 38 because it can offer a degree of camaraderie. P 66 The senior population represents the largest age COMMUNITY WORKSHOP Weaknesses: From a traditional team sport standpoint, segment and is growing at a rapid rate. The Department must ensure that it is in tune with the There is not enough emphasis on ADULT Edina ranks near the top in terms of operating basketball ranks highest among all sports, needs and interests of the 55+ group by offering recreation, and there is a too expense per resident. P 56 with nearly 24 million people reportedly a variety of quality programs and facilities that much focus on youth athletics. P 48 participating in 2013. P 67 cater to the senior crowd, while still adequately serving the youth and adult segments. P 38 National participatory trends in general fitness have experienced some strong growth in recent years. Many of these activities have become The fact that residents have greater earning COMMUNITY WORKSHOP Threats: Changing EPRD is a benchmark leader in revenue popular due to an increased interest among people to improve their health by engaging in an capabilities signals that they are likely willing to demographics, dismissal of public opinion for generation and cost recovery. P 56 active lifestyle. These activities also have very pay for high-quality programs and services that private benefit. P 49 few barriers to entry, which provides a variety of require a greater financial commitment, as long activities that are relatively inexpensive to as the quality reflects the price. P 38 participate in and can be performed by nearly anyone with no time restrictions. P 69 Public Input Benchmarking National Trends Edina Trends The changing demographic profile of Edina, CAPITAL BUDGET DISTRIBUTION: Edina is NATIONAL TRENDS IN AQUATIC ACTIVITY Particularly due to an aging population, will put COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY heavily focused on Fitness swimming is the absolute leader in new and different demands on the Department in terms of the programs and facilities it provides to 68% have not participated in recreation programs renovation and construction, but does not invest multigenerational appeal with over 26 million the public. Given that many of the Department's in the past 12 months. P 51 any capital dollars into design, acquisition, or reported participants in 2013, a 13.5% increase offerings are geared towards youth and families, other categories. P 57 from the previous year. P 71 the mix of services and amenities may need to change over time. P 46 The City of Edina demonstrates very high market COMMUNITY/RECREATION CENTERS: EPRD potential index numbers for fitness activities, COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY ranks second to last in center square footage per outdoor activities, and money spent on recreation while producing mixed results for general sports 58% would use an indoor walking and jogging person. This comparison confirms the well- and. All activities related to fitness reported well track if developed. P 51 known deficit of community recreation space above average market potential, as well as some within the City. P 60 select general sports activities (e.g. downhill skiing, tennis, and golf). P 77 These high index numbers paired with the above average household Income characteristics of residents is very promising from a programming COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY standpoint. The Department has strong potential Other indoor spaces include - exercise for 50+ Edina is on par among benchmark agencies for to generate revenues from programs by years, aerobics/fitness and dance, weight room performing / visual art centers. P 62 capitalizing on the favorable earning ability of the and cardio area. All at about 33% P 51 service area and the residents' willingness to spend money on recreational activities, as exhibited by the market potential index figures. P 77 COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY Edina lags behind other benchmark communities In analyzing the local trends in general sports, the majority of activities fall below the national 51% are very supportive of indoor community in indoor community space, capital budget average.... This deviation might indicate a lack center at Grandview. Somewhat supportive was sources, and distribution of expenditures for of awareness.....a lack of available amenities. 22% P 51 planning and development. P 63 P 77 INDOOR FITNESS - A desire for increased access COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY to a range of indoorfitness activities was What deterred folks from using facilities or parks: expressed. Flexible indoor facilities could host a 15% too far from home, 16% no facility or range of activities for a wide age -range of ages program, 14% use facilities in other cities. P51 and ability levels. It listed trending activites such as Pickleball, dodgeball, mommy, fitness P79 0 • Public Input Benchmarking National Trends Edina Trends COMMUNITY NEEDS SURVEY How to Allocate $100 in services: Create a new centrally located community gathering place: $6.00 P 51 Should we Build a Community Center? Let's Look at Edina Parks and Recreation Vision and Mission EDINA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT VISION Page 12 Tobe recognized as having Minnesota's premiere parks, recreation and trail system that provides unrivaled opportunities to maximize Edina's quality of life by nurturing the health and well-being of our people, our community, our environment, and our economy. EDINA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT MISSION Page 12 We create parks, facilities, and programs to foster a healthy inclusive community. We accomplish this through creative leadership, collaborations, environmentally sustainable practices, and the responsible use of available resources. GUIDING PRINCIPLES (edited list) Page 12 • Promote community health and wellness for residents in our parks and programming. • Provide excellence and innovation in parks and recreation services and facilities to meet the needs of the community. • Promote equity and engagement within the parks system and its programs. PURPOSE OF STRATEGIC PLAN Page 20 (edited) The purpose of the Park System Strategic Plan is to .... Evaluate current facilities andn programs to determin if the recreation and leisure needs of Edina's citizens are being adequately met. WHY THE PLAN IS IMPORTANT Page 20 (edited) Responding to aging populations, changing community needs and desires, and creating a more sustainable system, environmentally and financially, are a few challenges that must be addressed. • Should we Build a Community Center? Let's Look at the Proposed Strategic Plan Recommendations Page Recommendations or Key Findings 14 Provide a multi -generational community center that is all-inclusive 14 Provide additonal community gathering areas 17 Provide a variety of programs that meet community needs and interests 17 Provide more community building / socialization programming 18 Moving forward, additional actions are required to retain a quality system and stay ahead of the park infrastructure and asset needs that the Department manages and owns. Improving the existing park system to address under served populations and changing needs will ensure the system continues to support the high quality expectations of Edina's residents. 44 Increase the amount of passive recreational opportunities available to residents. 44 The Department could be a better facilitator of recreation by bringing people, especially adults, with common interests together and providing more spaces that are open to interpretation of the user, which might encourage wider segment appeal than the heavily programmed, youth -centric focus of parks today. 44 The Department should strive to expand its target market to be all- inclusive. There is a large portion of the community that is currently underserved. There is a clear deficiency of recreational opportunities for adults and seniors, and the Department must improve its multi- generational appeal, 52 An indoor fitness facility is desired by the community, including an indoorwalking /jogging track and an indoor pool. 77 The Department has strong potential to generate revenues from programs by capitalizing on the favorable earning ability of the service area and the residents' willingness to spend money on recreational activities, as exhibited by the market potential index figures. 82 A direct correlation exists between the national participatory trends and the local market trends, in that the service area shows a high propensity to engage in recreational activities pertaining to fitness. Based on market potential index figures, the Department should expect residents to participate in fitness activities at a much higher rate than the national average. This would indicate that the Department should offer a wide variety of fitness programming, with a willingness to introduce innovative and trending activities. 82 Based on the findings from the demographic and trends analysis, the Department is very fortunate to have an ideal service area. Not only are income characteristics well above average, but the user base also has a strong tendency to spend their time and money on activities that are in the Department's wheelhouse. The future success of the Department will rely heavily on its ability to capitalize on these favorable market conditions by providing facilities, amenities, and programs that are geared toward the needs and interests of the local community. 224 PROVIDE A MULTI -GENERATIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER THAT IS ALL-INCLUSIVE. A community center need was identified in the community survey and the Level of Service Analysis. A facility of this type would fill multiple needs including the creation of community meeting and gathering spaces, provide a space for the multiple generations and their ability to interact, and supporting recreation activities and users that are currently under -served. The City will need to study the programmatic, spatial, and amenity requirements of the facility. The Grandview site has been identified as a potential location for this facility and would provide a much needed community gathering facility north of Highway 62. 0 • SHOULD WE BUILD A COMMUNITY CENTER? LET'S LOOK AT A SUMMARY OF ISSUES IN THE STRATEGIC PLAN The following are key points brought out in the proposed strategic plan that support a recreation/fitness community center in Edina. Health Trends ■ Fitness awareness has increased due to national obesity issue ■ Health and recreation centers are seeing increased memberships and use ■ Public is demanding facilities that support healthier lifestyle ■ Walking, running and biking becoming more popular ■ Support these activities to build a healthier community ■ Time pressures make residents seek activities and infrastructure that are close to home ■ Unstructured participation activities (i.e. NOT classes) meet the needs of adults and families juggling busy schedules ■ Unstructured participation allows people to engage with their family, friends and community ■ Most popular activity for Americans over 45 is walking (It will be important to ensure that aging citizens of Edina have access to amenities that fit their needs) Edina Trends ■ The senior population represents the largest age segment and is growing at a rapid rate. ■ Edina has a growing population over the age of 55. In 2014 nearly 35% of the population is above age 55 and that number is projected to be approximately 45% by 2019. ■ The fact that residents have greater earning capabilities signals that they are likely willing to pay for high-quality programs and services that require a greater financial commitment, as long as the quality reflects the price. 0 What Edina is Lacking ■ Recreation / community centers ■ Gymnasium space ■ ADA accessibility and inclusive design for parks/facilities ■ Fitness centers and programming ■ Multi -generational programming ■ Equity in programming, amenities and upkeep ■ Large portion of the community is currently underserved. Clear deficiency of recreational opportunities for adults and seniors. ■ There is not enough emphasis on ADULT recreation, and there is a too much focus on youth athletics. ■ EPRD ranks second to last in community/recreation center square footage per person. This comparison confirms the well-known deficit of community recreation space within the City General Thoughts Understanding the needs of the community becomes an invaluable asset in planning for future of the Edina Parks and Recreation System. Understanding the • community's need can help to drive decisions about priorities for program or system improvements and help to eliminate surprises down the road. A critical element of the parks and recreation master planning process is community engagement, which is necessary to effectively deliver a community -oriented parks and recreation system. A balanced, open, and collaborative engagement process builds community -wide trust in the plan and the planning methods used. Community engagement for this project was carefully planned in order to accurately capture all major community needs and included conducting focus groups, public workshops, a statistically -valid community survey. Results from the SFIA's Topline Participation Report demonstrate increased popularity among Americans in numerous general recreation activities. Much like the general fitness activities, these activities encourage an active lifestyle, can be performed individually or with a group, and are not limited by time restraints. 0 • General Thoughts, continued Health insurance providers and health care workers are actively educating the public in the benefits of active lifestyles, and health and recreation centers are seeing increased memberships and use. As a result, the general public is demanding facilities and programs that support healthier lifestyles. Because of the pressures on time, people are seeking activities and infrastructure that are close to home and easily accommodated in their typical schedules. Unstructured participation activities that meet busy schedules and allow them to engage with their family, friends, and community are highly desired. This will require a flexible park system with facilities and programs that include options that fit multiple needs. The City of Edina demonstrates very high market potential index numbers for fitness activities, outdoor activities, and money spent on recreation while producing mixed results for general sports and. All activities related to fitness reported well above average market potential, as well as some select general sports activities (e.g. downhill skiing, tennis, and gol fl. These high index numbers paired with the above average household income characteristics of residents is very promising from a programming standpoint. The Department has strong potential to generate revenues from programs by capitalizing on the favorable earning ability of the service area and the residents' willingness to spend money on recreational activities, as exhibited by the market potential index figures. Recommendation (page 224) PROVIDE A MULTI -GENERATIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER THAT IS ALL-INCLUSIVE. A community center need was identified in the community survey and the Level of Service Analysis. A facility of this type would fill multiple needs including the creation of community meeting and gathering spaces, provide a space for the multiple generations and their ability to interact, and supporting recreation activities and users that are currently under -served. The City will need to study the programmatic, spatial, and amenity requirements of the facility. The Grandview site has been identified as a potential location for this facility and would provide a much needed community gathering facility north of Highway 62. 40 Deb Manaen From: City of Bloomington<bloomington@service.govdelivery.com> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:43 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Healthy Choices eNews: Bike and Walk to City Events Dews of the Bloomington, Edina and Richfield Healthy C01111TILInitieS Partnership Tri -city Partners C` for Healthy / Communities 4 bloomingfon Making the healthy choice the easy choicein Bloomington, Edina and Richfield Healthy Choices eNews - July 2, 2015 Have fun biking and walking to community events A map and listing of some the summer's most bike- and walk -friendly events taking place in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield will be available at many event locations. Partners from the three cities created the map and listing to make it easier for residents to have fun biking and walking in their communities, which also provide many health benefits and reduce harm to the environment. Read more about biking and walking to city events and download the map. o`J Bloomington OfJ Richfield ofok Edina York N -dale take Pa*/Baa6hell * 28th Awe Light Rall Park & Ride cwlc Placa * *9990 LYndale An S Quality Bike Ptod99te Tri -City Partners for Healthy Communities is comprised of leaders from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. They are working through Bloomington's Division of Public Health to make their communities places where it is easy for everyone to be healthy and everyone has an opportunity to live long and well. Statewide HeaISHIP lth Improvememnt Progra HEALTH REFOR M Update preferences or unsubscribe here: Subscriber Preferences Page. Use your e-mail address to log in. Report problems to subscriberhelp c govdelivery.com. Send general inquiries to information ,c bloomingtommn.gov. This service is provided to you at no charge by the City of Bloomington. This email was sent to ihovlandt3ici.edina.mn.us using GovDelivery, on behalf of. City of Bloomington • 1800 West Old Shakopee Road ``,.,-•`'t` Bloomington, MN 55431-3027 - 952-563-8700 • TTY 952-563-8740 govt l y y�l lha tirr1 •gin! MINUTES • CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday May 14, 2015 7:02 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:02p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Anderson, Gubrud, Howard, Manser, Padmanabhan, Seeley, Thompson, Waddick, Zarrin and Chair Kostuch Late: Glahn and Sierks Absent: Satterlee Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Manser to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes. Member Thompson said his Education and Outreach meeting day needs to be changed to the first Thursday of the month on page 3. Member Howard said the motion on pg. 4 should be "not" carried. Member Sierks arrived at 7:05p.m. • 13. Attendance report and roster. Member Thompson noticed Member Satterlee's name was misspelled on the report. C. Workgroup list and minutes. Member Waddick said that her Water Quality Working Group meeting date needs to be changed to the second Tuesday on the Working Group list. Member Zarrin requested Tim Rudnicki to be removed from the Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group and Dianne Latham will become a Member. Member Zarrin announced the members of the Edina Climate Commitment Team are Sarah Zarrin, Bill Sierks, Richard Manser, City Manager Scott Neal and Council Member Kevin Staunton. They will meet the 1S` and 3'd Mondays of the month at 7:30am. Member Waddick requested to add Richard Strong to the Water Quality Working Group. Motion made by Member Zarrin and seconded by Member Sierks to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No Comment. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Xcel Energy Franchise Ordinance. Mr. Bintner said the City entered a franchise agreement with Xcel Energy 20yrs ago. It's time to renew it and Scott Neal is asking what the EEC Members want to include in it. The Public Utilities Commission has the final approval of what enters into the franchise. The Commissioners reviewed Scott's Memo. 0 Member Glahn arrived at 7:23p.m. Member Sierks said the City of Minneapolis renewed their franchise agreement with Xcel and added a separate memorandum of understanding of clean energy. A Board was created of Xcel, CenterPointe • and Minneapolis staff to help them achieve the greenhouse gas goals. Member Sierks reviewed Minneapolis's memorandum with the Commissioners. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Zarrin that the Commission recommend that the City of Edina negotiate the equivalent of a memorandum of understanding clean energy partnership to ensure that Xcel will work in partnership with the City to help achieve our Greenhouse gas goals. Motion carried (9 yes, 1 nay) Member Glahn opposed. Commissioners are concerned about the 20yr term. Member Glahn opposed, because if Xcel is doing something extra for Edina over another city, than Edina's residential rates will increase. Chair Kostuch asked to change his vote to no, because he didn't know that the rates were going to increase. Motion to reconsider Motion made by Chair Kostuch and seconded by Member Howard to reconsider the motion to revote. Motion failed (5 yes, 5 nay) Members Zarrin, Waddick, Manser and Thompson opposed. Member Glahn clarified that the Cities that have underground utilities pay more than the Cities that have aerial. Chair Kostuch reminded Members that all discussion needs to occur before the vote. The Commissioners would like to see what the staff proposes before the July 2155 Council meeting. B. Community Solar. Member Sierks says Xcel Energy provides our residents energy. A resident can do is solar on their roof top or backyard. Community Solar directs Xcel to set it up in a location not on your property. You'll subscribe to be a part of the project and Xcel buys all of the energy and gives you credits on your bill. The solar collected will be clean with a contract of 25yrs. Member Sierks has two questions for the Commissioners. First, Does the City want to be a Host Site? Xcel buys the energy from subscribers and the City can be a subscriber. Met Council wants to have a bunch of Cities together to get best deal on the project constructed by end of 2016. An RFP will help guide the process. Mr. Bintner said he likes Met Councils idea of joint powers agreement or letter of intent. Member Glahn said the rules for community solar haven't been set yet. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Council Advisory. Motion carried (8 yes, 2 nay) Chair Kostuch and Member Glahn opposed. Second, Does the City want Edina Host and lease space out with the garden located on Public Works roof? Edina residents can apply first and then others. The City would need to list all conditions. This contract would be with smaller companies and the City would own 40%. Mr. Bintner reviews the work plan item "City will allocate staff time to scope, bid and execute a community solar project on a city building in 2015." Mr. Bintner opined that the no organizational lacks capacity to develop their own solar. He isn't an expert in solar. 0 Member Sierks was requested to prepare a summary of plus and minuses to give to City staff and • Commissioners to help them understand what's the best way to go. Then Sarah will bring it to Scott, so he can create a budget and staff support. C. Green Step Cities / Carbon Disclosure Prosect / ICLEI Membership. Chair Kostuch said Germana Paterlini, past EEC Commissioner, received a request to submit data to the Carbon Disclosure Project. The data was from 2007 and every year it was continuously submitted without approval from the City. Mr. Bintner said that the Carbon Disclosure Project use to be a subset of ICLEI Membership. Now the Carbon Disclosure Project and ICLEI Membership have parted ways. ICLEI has started its own carbon tracking, but the City isn't a part of it. Member Sierks said Germana and the past Assistant City Manager Heather Worthington gave regular updates to Council and said it was a big deal for a city our size to be a part of an International Disclosure project. Member Sierks said this should be brought to Sarah's ECCT and ask City Manager Neal if he wants the continuation of the updating and maintaining related data, GSC, carbon disclosure, and ICELE and who is responsible for them, one of the city staff or an EEC member. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS A. Email from Dianne Latham — Former EEC Member. No Comment. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. No Comment. B. Business Recycling Working Group. No Comment. C. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee. No Comment. D. Community Solar Subcommittee. No Comment. E. Education Outreach Working Group. Member Thompson said the "Revenge of the Electric Car" movie • was canceled due to unable to get contract. 30 people attended the Cowspiracy movie. F. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee. Member Gubrud requested to assess funds need to subsidize the HES Enhanced installs in 2015. G. Local Food Working Group. No Comment. H. Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group. No Comment. I. Student Subcommittee. No Comment. J. Urban Forest Task Force. No Comment. K. Water Quality Working Group. No Comment. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. 2015-2016 EEC Term Summary / Council Advisory Status / Workplan. Mr. Bintner announced that Assistant City Manager Karen Kurt and Water Resource Coordinator Laura Adler are leaving the City. Chair Kostuch announced that he'll be unable to attend the June Energy & Environment Commission meeting. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Kostuch declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30p.m. Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Glahn to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Rebe ca Foster GIS Administrator Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 NAME Glahn, William TERM41712015 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 (Enter Date) 6 86% Gubrud, Bob 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Howard, John 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Kostuch, Keith 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Manser, Richard 3/1 /2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Satterlee, Lauren 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 80% Seeley, Melissa 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Sierks. Bill 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Thompson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Waddick, Louise 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Zarrin, Sarah 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% Heer, John 2/1/2015 1 1 2 100% Latham, Dianne Plunkett 2/1/2015 1 1 2 100% 0 0% Anderson, Reilly 9/1/20151 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Padmanabhan, Sunaya 9/1/20151 1 1 1 1 1 4 57% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 10, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Hobbs, Lee, Strauss, Thorsen, Halva, Nemerov, Olsen, Carr, Forrest and Platteter Absent: Seeley III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of the June 10, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. • IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Nemerov moved approval of the meeting minutes for May 13, 2015 with changes. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None. Commissioner Olsen moved to close public comment. Commission Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Variance. Great Neighborhood Homes/Scott Busyn. 51 15 Wooddale Glen, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reported that the subject property is approximately 98 feet in width and is 11,931 square feet in area. The property is a corner lot with frontage along both Wooddale Ave. and Wooddale Glen. • The property is subjected to two front yard setbacks along both street frontages. The property owner is requesting to demolish the existing single-family home with a single stall garage, which currently does Page 1 of 10 . not meet the setback required from Wooddale Ave. of 59 feet or the required interior side yard setback to the east of 10 feet for the purposes of building a new home on the site. The applicant has stated that the current home is in disrepair, is unlivable at this time and is functionally obsolete. The existing one car garage is only 8 feet wide and is quite close to the east side yard at 4 feet, (6 feet closer than allowed by ordinance). The zoning ordinance requires a minimum two car garage per single dwelling unit with a minimum, (east), side yard setback of 10 feet. The existing home is nonconforming to current code requirements regarding setback from Woodale Ave., the interior side yard setback to the east and providing a minimum two car garage. The proposed new home will conform to all zoning requirements with the exception of setback from Wooddale Ave., which the current home also does not conform to. Aaker further explained that the propsed home will be two stories with an attached three car garage, (one stall to be tandem behindthe other). Garage width from the front fagade will be 23 feet and present as a two car garage from Wooddale Glen. The new home will be upgraded to meet modern needs and conform to the minimum two car garage requirement. The applicant has indicated that the home will be a "cottage style" home with highly articulated facades on all sides to include multiple windows, layered roof lines, box outs, brackets, shutters and a stone chimney. A design concern with a conforming solution given the deep setback from Wooddale is the narrow building width opportunity along Wooddale Glen, which pushes a front loading garage into prominance with the potential to create what is known as a "snout house" design. The proposal is to avoid a garage prominent design by locating it on the west side of the house which also buffers living areas from traffic along Wooddale Ave. The intent is to also work with neighboring property owners on clearing up mismatched fencing, buckthorn, • wood piles etc. while implimenting a mutually beneficial landscape plan for all on site. The applicant has indicated that he has approached adjacent property owners and that they have been supportive of his ideas for the site Continuing, Aaker noted that there are existing single-family homes on the adjacent north and west lots, facing both on Wooddale Ave. and Wooddale Glen. The north lot has a front setback of 59 feet. The lot to the west of the subject property fronting Wooddale Glen is set back 43 feet from the front property line. The existing home to be torn down is located 42.9 feet from Wooddale Ave. and is nonconforming to the required 59 foot street setback. The existing and proposed new homes conform to the 43 foot front yard setback required from the lot line adjacent to Wooddale Glen, but neither the existing or proposed homes conform to the required setback from Wooddale Ave. The required setback from Wooddale Ave. cuts the lot in half with buildable area of the lot reduced even farther given the 25 foot rear yard setback, 10 foot side yard setback requirement and 43 foot setback required from Wooddale Glen. The lot area of 11, 931 square feet should allow for building coverage of 2,982 square feet, (25% of the lot), however, given setback requirements, the buildable area of the lot is approximately 1,400 square feet or roughly less than 12% of the lot area. Code requires a front yard setback equal to the setback of the adjacent home to the north, or 59 feet for this lot. The street setback required for typical corner lots that do not have homes facing a side street is 15 feet. The proposed home will be 25 feet from the lot line adjacent to Wooddale Ave. It • should be noted that the two nearest corner lots on the cul-de-sacs of Wooddale Glen and Wooddale Page 2 of 10 • Lane are also closer to Woodale at 15.7 feet and 33.1 feet instead of 59 feet as required for the subject lot. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the R- I Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with all the standards, with exception of the front/side street setback (as determined by the adjacent home). 2. The home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property. 3. The property is subject to an unreasonably deep street setback that severely diminishes the building opportunity for the lot. 4. The proposed home will be more conforming than the existing home by providing for more than the minimum two car garage requirement and increasing the east side yard setback to be greater than the minimum 10 feet required. 5. There is a practical difficulty in meeting the ordinance requirements and there are circumstances unique to the property due to an imposed front yard setback from the adjacent home that shrinks building footprint options to less than 12% of the lot area. 6. The variance, if approved, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The new home will be well articulated and will enhance the character of the neighborhood. Approval of the variances are also subject to the following conditions: • 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Survey date stamped: May 11, 2015 Building plans and elevations date stamped: May 11, 2015. Appearing for the Applicant Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes Discussion Commissioner Nemerov asked if trees will be addressed with this project. Mr. Busyn responded that trees will be inventoried and will be saved when possible and replaced if removed. Commissioner Lee asked Planner Aaker what the lot coverage requirement is for this lot. Planner Aaker reported lot coverage is 25%; noting the subject lot is over 9,000 square feet. Lee asked if corner lots have different setback requirements. Aaker responded in the affirmative. She explained a 15 -foot side street setback is required if the homes are back to back; however, if the garage faces the side street a 20 -foot setback is required for the garage from the side street. Continuing, Aaker explained corner lots can also be subjected to two Page 3 of 10 4o front yard setbacks if the adjacent house faces that side street. Aaker concluded that the intent of the Code was to maintain the streetscape. Applicant Presentation Mr. Busyn reported that he held a neighborhood meeting to inform neighbors of their intent to tear down the existing home and construct a new home. Busyn said that the plan for the new home allows for the creation of more functional rear yards for the three adjoining properties. He also noted that currently the site is in disrepair and will be "cleaned up". Continuing, Busyn said the new house would conform to the Tree Ordinance. Chair Platteter asked Mr. Busyn if he worked with the adjoining neighbor on the existing retaining wall and driveway. Busyn responded in the affirmative. He added he is in contact with that neighbor and is keeping him "in the loop" on the drainage and landscaping plans. Public Comment Mr. Cobb, 5117 Wooddale Glen was present representing himself and property owners at 51 19 Wooddale Glen and 5113 Wooddale Avenue. Cobb addressed the Commission and informed them he supports the project as submitted and is pleased with the density of house and overall look of the project. He further added the plans as submitted will "clean up" this corner and will enhance not only the site but the entire neighborhood. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion; all voted aye; motion carried. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including capping the building height at 32 -feet, adding an additional suggestion that every effort is made to save the large Oak tree. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. Rezoning with Variances. M. Mortenson. 3923 491h St West, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Mathias Mortenson is requesting a rezoning from R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District to tear down the existing single-family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. The property is located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and east of a four-story apartment building. To accommodate the request the applicant is requesting the following: • i- Rezoning from R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District; Page 4 of 10 Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; Teague reminded the Commission the applicant made a similar request in 2014 that was denied by the City Council. The denial of that rezoning centered on the variances associated with the size of the structure proposed. The planning commission recommended approval of the rezoning of the property from R -I to R-2. The previous request included variances for building coverage and side yard setback requirements. The building coverage variance was from 25% to 32%, and the side yard setback variance from 10 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. There also were retaining wall setback variances proposed. Teague reported that the applicant has revised the plans so that there are no variances associated with the proposed structure• the request is now only for the rezoning of property and the lot area and width requirements. The applicant has hired a professional engineer do the grading, stormwater management and erosion control plan. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Rezoning and lot area and width variances at 3923 49`h Street. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan guides this site for low density attached residential which is described as "two-family and attached dwellings of low densities and moderate heights. This category recognizes the historical role of these housing types as transitional districts between single-family residential areas and major thoroughfares or commercial districts." The proposed rezoning precisely fits this category. 2. The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single-family and two-family dwellings; however, two dwelling units are the predominant uses on this block. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: Any new structure on this property shall conform to the minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements of R-2 Zoning District. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated June 3, 2015. Any new duplex structure would be required to be installed with a fire sprinkler system, per the state building code. Appearing for the Applicant iMathias Mortenson, applicant Page 5 of 10 0 Discussion Commissioner Thorsen asked Planner Teague if there are other similar "areas" in Edina. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. He noted there is a similar pocket on West 54`h Street that's a mixture of single and double dwelling units, adding there are other similar pockets throughout the City. Commissioner Lee questioned lot coverage. Planner Teague responded that lot coverage is at 25%. Applicant Presentation Mr. Mortenson addressed the Commission and reported since his last appearance before the Commission he revised his plans and eliminated the need for variances as per concerns raised by the Commission. Mortenson said most of the concerns expressed by the Commission centered on the size of the proposed structure and the variances needed to build the structure. Mortenson stated he revised the plans and reduced the size of the structure eliminating the variances. Continuing, Mortenson said his goal in redeveloping this property was to provide a housing type absent from the city's housing stock, one that accommodates the needs of an aging population in place. Concluding, Mortenson further reported that his project aims to be constructed at the highest standards of sustainability. Commissioner Forrest questioned if with the revisions light access continues to be available for the proposed solar panels. Mr. Mortenson responded in the affirmative. Forrest further commented that she was a little concerned that the proposed "caregiver space" could become separate living quarters. Planner Teague responded the request is for two (2) dwelling units; not four (4), adding the caregiver space does not contain a kitchen and would not be considered another dwelling. Forrest asked Mr. Mortenson if that was understood. Mortenson said he has no problem with two units; adding that was his intention and what's proposed. Commissioner Lee commented that in her opinion when she viewed the plans she thought the interior clearance may not meet ADA standards. She further questioned building height. Mr. Mortenson acknowledged it did take him some time to revise the plans reducing the square footage; however, it was accomplished and the schematic does meet ADA standards. With regard to building height, the previous roof was a gable; the present roof is a hip. Concluding, Lee questioned drainage. Mortenson responded that the site will drain to the respective rain gardens. Public Testimony Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. • Page 6 of 10 Jim Stromberg, 3930 49`h Street West expressed his support for the project. He said one of the reasons he moved into this neighborhood was because of the mixed housing opportunities. Chair Platteter asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Carr complimented the applicant on listening to Commission comments by eliminating the variances for the structure, adding sustainability and addressing the need for this type of housing unit is a plus for the City of Edina A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging the changes to the plans that reduced building size; thereby eliminating the need for structure variances was a positive step. It was further acknowledged that the variances required for the rezoning were reasonable noting that the majority of doubles in this neighborhood are beneath the minimum standard square footage (15,000 sq. ft.) for a double dwelling unit. Sustainability was also a huge plus; however, Commissioners did further reiterate for the applicant that the subject site is two units only. Motion • Commissioner Nemerov moved to approve the request for rezoning subject to staff findings and staff conditions. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. Commissioner Lee thanked the neighbor for his comment; however, indicated that as proposed she can't support the request; it's just too much for the site in her opinion Commissioner Forrest stated she supports the project as presented, adding the revision to one driveway; not two as previously proposed was beneficial Chair Platteter commented that he too can support the rezoning; adding Edina could use more of this type of housing. Chair Platteter called the vote. Ayes; Hobbs, Thorsen, Strauss, Olsen, Nemerov, Carr, Forrest, Platteter. Nay; Lee. Motion carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Consideration of Development Principles for the Southdale France Avenue Area Planner Teague reported that members of the Southdale France Avenue Area Working Group 40 are present this evening to introduce to the Commission their "guiding principles" for the area. Page 7 of 10 • Teague noted that two members of the Planning Commission sit on this working group; Steve Hobbs and Jo Ann Olsen. Teague introduced Michael Schroeder to brief the Commission on their progress. Mr. Schroeder introduced to the Commission present members of the working group; Jim Nelson, Robb Gruman, Harvey Turner, Ben Martin, and Lori Severson. Continuing, Schroeder reported that to date the "Group" has held nine meetings including outreach sessions for the community. Schroeder reported that the "Group" is comprised of 12 members; two planning commissioners, four appointed by the City Council, three members of the neighborhood and four business owners. Schroeder said the Work Group functions very well together and developed nine (9) working principles. Schroeder said their intent is incorporating these principles as policy for the Southdale area. Schroeder introduced the principles: • Give -to -Get; Plan & Process • Edina Cultural Preferences • District Function • Comprehensive Connections; Movement • Site Design; Transitions • Health • Innovation • • Land Use; Live -able Precincts • Economic Vitality Schroeder said that stage one of the process was to deliver working principles intended as a guide for the public and private areas of the study area. Schroeder explained that the focus of the group was more aspirational. He explained that the group believes the principles may evolve as we receive more feedback. Schroeder further asked the Commission to note that each principle has supporting questions. Concluding, Schroeder said the "Group" has agreed to continue the work and look forward to moving to stage two. Robb Gruman addressed the Commission and explained one thing that the development community would like to have would be specific guidelines on ordinances and what's expected of them. Gruman said in his opinion City focus should be on the quality of developments and to look at developments in context. Jim Nelson addressed the Commission and commented that in his opinion "reach out" sessions between developers and residents need to occur. Nelson said in attending numerous meetings the impression of developers residents expressed wasn't very good. Nelson said time needs to be taken for both developers and residents to speak and listen to each other, adding the burden needs to fall on both parties to establish relationships. Page 8 of 10 A& Harvey Turner told the Commission he moved into Edina in 1988, adding when he was researching where to live Edina was the name that came up from everyone he asked. Turner said his goal in working with the work group is to make Edina the best place it can be. He said one step is viewing residents and developers as partners to complete the goal of creating the best Edina. Comments Commissioner Olsen told the Commission this group was terrific to work with, adding she feels privileged to do so. Commissioner Hobbs agreed. Chair Platteter told the working group he was very supportive of their work. He suggested that the group work on establishing a name for this area and to continue to think broadly. Platteter said he is very supportive of the aspirational vision of the group, adding vision starts everybody thinking. He further noted that the Southdale area is not only a neighborhood amenity; it belongs to all Edina and it may be beneficial to for the group to reach out to others in the community; not only from this neighborhood. Continuing, Platteter said listening to "other voices" can help in developing quality projects. Platteter concluded that educational aspects should also be added. Commissioner Forrest thanked the group for their work. She said in her opinion it is reasonable to establish standards and expectations that express values, economic diversity, is embracement of the arts, age diversity, connectivity, mobility etc. Commissioner Carr also thanked the group adding the Commission needs these type of tools to help us in our decision making. Chair Platteter and Commissioners again thanked the group for their work, adding they look forward to stage two. Motion Commissioner Nemerov moved to recommend adoption of the guiding principles as policy. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. Commissioner Nemerov suggested that the "principles" be reviewed again to gage how they are working. Carr further suggested that the principles could be added to applications. All voted aye; motion carried to adopt guiding principles for the Southdale France area. Commissioner Lee commented that she wonders if the principles should be prioritized. Mr. Schroeder responded the group did not discuss priority. He said at this time the nine principles are all important. He did agree that staff could begin using the principles when reviewing • developments. Page 9 of 10 • Vill. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS 0 Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Platter reported that the Commission just completed a successful "walk about" of the greater Southdale area. Platteter said he continues to schedule reports from the Heritage Preservation Board, Cindy Larson and City attorney, Roger Knutson (when time permits). He added he believes July will be a good time to hear from the Heritage Preservation Board. Commissioner Carr noted the Commission may want to revisit the 2015 work plan since we're at the half way mark. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported that at their last meeting the City Council approved the subdivision request for the property on Concord Avenue. They also approved the Blakewoods subdivision request with the looped main, no sidewalk and modified curb. Planner Teague said if Roger Knutson and Cindy Larson are available he would work on scheduling them for the next meeting of the Commission on June 24th. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Thorsen moved to adjourn the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 9:40 pm. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 140351W ow'Ea"AAA16 "P, !J!�!►llysubmitted ; Page 10 of 10 • MINUTES EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA EDINA CITY HALL Tuesday, April 7th, 2015 6:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Present: Cathy Cozad, Alison Pence, Aditya Mittal, Britta Orr, Kristen Conner, Melinda Bothun-Hurley, Joel Stegner, Magen Puerzer. Staff: Karla Kollodge, Jeff Brown. Absent: Michael Sackett, Virginia Ogle, Matt Doscotch III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA (Pence/Bothun-Hurley w/addition of Bloomington Public Health Presentation) IV. Bloomington Public Health Presentation by Molly Snuggerud. Presentation focused on Edina Family Health outreach and activities performed in the City through contract with Bloomington Public Health. Discussion around regular updates from supervisors w/BPH at CHC meetings. Group discussion following presentation. V. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA (Stegner/Cozad) A. Approval of March Minutes VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Community Health Committee will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Committee Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Committee might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sub -Group Discussion and Updates i. Mental Health/Substance Abuse ii. Adult Physical Health iii. Child/Adolescent Physical Health • Discussion around expectations, role, and intent for sub -groups, including meeting • frequency and reporting back to entire commission. Suggestion to rotate presentations at CHC meetings between work groups to allow time for meetings/research. Individual groups to decide meeting schedules between CHC monthly meetings. Sub -groups may choose 'organizer' to help schedule meetings and keep groups on task. Emails to be sent out to each group so members may communicate in between meetings. Reminder of quorum limitations. B. 2015 Work Plan Discussion — Topic leader assignments Discussed work plan items and logical groups for leadership. Work groups to evaluate work plan items for logical inclusion in each work group. ii. Discussed revision of work plan items to create more tangible goals, similar to e -cigarette work from 2014. Chair and staff will work on language before May meeting. iii. Encouraged Board and Commission blog participation. C. Binge Drinking Focus/Discussion —Tabled to next meeting, presentation by work group. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS X. STAFF COMMENTS A. D.A.R.E. Presentation — Invite Officer Dick to future CHC meeting. B. Invite Edina Resource Center staff to meeting. C. Meeting with Superintendent Report — Report back from staff regarding meeting with Mr. Dressen and other district staff. Staff will follow up. D. Monday, May 4th Meeting is in the City Council Chambers, staff will check to see if it can be recorded to count as required recorded meeting for 2015. E. Senior Wellness Fair coming up, encouraged participation. XI. ADJOURNMENT (Stegner/Cozad) The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. • 0 0 0 Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMITTEE Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 NAM E Melinda Bothun-Hurley TERM 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 (Enter Date) 1 (Enter Date) 5 83% Virginia Ogle 2/1/2017 1 1 1 3 50% Alison Pence 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% M Ghael SaGke# 2/1/2017 1 1 2 33% Matt Doscotch 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 67% Joel Stegner 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Cathy Cozad 3/1/20161 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Kristen Conner 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 67% "i,-4 2/1/2015 1 1 17% Britta Orr 3/1/2018 1 1 1 3 50% Magen Puerzer 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 4 1 670 Steve Sarles 1 1 2 33% Aditya Mittal 9/1/20151 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 67% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously -scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR SCHEDULE MEETING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION May 26, 2015 at 7:OOPM City Hall, Community Room I. CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order at 7:04 pm. Commissioners answering roll call were Chair Arseneault, Burza, Gates, Kennedy, Rinn, Seidman, Weinert, and Winnick. Staff present: HRRC Staff Liaison, MJ Lamon. Absent members: Sanders. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Seidman motioned to approve meeting agenda. Commissioner Kennedy seconded. Motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES • Seidman motioned to approve the meeting minutes from the April 28, 2015 HRRC meeting. Commissioner Winnick seconded. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Commissioner Tian arrived at 7:06 pm. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. New member Intro Commissioner Rinn introduced herself to the commission. Commissioner Vecchio -Smith arrived 7:09 pm. B. Work Plan Updates a) Community Outreach: Commissioner Burza, Chair of the Working Group, has met with the working group to create goals of Community Outreach initiative. The group has decided a flyer is ineffective and they want to reach out in alternative ways. The group will find ambassadors throughout diverse community groups who can promote the meeting. The Working Group will do "field trips" to these 0 locations to update everyone on the goals and hope to get better participation. Next meeting is on Friday (May 29). Group is still looking at holding the listening session meetings in the fall. b) Human Rights City Designation: Commissioner Sanders is stepping down from • Human Rights City Designation working group. Commissioner Winnick has offered to join the working group. Next meeting is on Saturday (May 30) for the dry run of the presentation. First presentation date is set for Wednesday (June 3) next week at the Minneapolis rotary club. Group will first explain how communities in the metro area have human rights commissions, history of human rights, what human rights are and lastly what the Human Rights City designation is and the HRRC's goal to obtain status. HRRC had discussion about City Council awareness of HRRC interest in achieving Human Rights City Designation. It has been noted Human Rights City Designation is on our approved work plan. c) Affordable Housing: Summary handout from Joyce Repya on our current state of affordable housing was presented to the HRRC. The HRRC provided comments for the Vision Edina strategic vision and hoped to convey the message to address more of the affordable housing plans. Some of the HRRC comments were incorporated into Vision Edina and were approved. More recent developments in Edina had to receive variances but neither included affordable housing. Currently there are several pending projects which will all include affordable housing. Committee's recommendation is to keep the HRRC updated on development action in the City and bring attention to City Council. HRRC would like to invite Bill Neuendorf to a future meeting to get a better picture of all the development in the City. ' d) Blog/Website Maintenance: Commissioner Tian reported on his scan of the HRRC website and noted several items that are no longer relevant or are in need of updating, including the Senior Assessment Study, the Proposed Constitutional Amendment Statement, committee picture, and adding links to our page such as to HRRC blog posts. HRRC requested to bring website proposal back to the next meeting. Blog: Commissioner Tian wrote Tom Oye summary which was posted. Student Commissioner Weinert's Human Trafficking post is still in the back log. Committee discussed that to be effective on posting, a commissioner who is in charge of an event should ensure a blog is written ASAP following the event so we can submit timely posts after an event. e) Edina Community Council: Commissioner Winnick provided the Edina Community Center pamphlet which describes the scope of resources and services available through the Edina Resource Center for our information and review. C. Edina Mail Correspondence HRRC reviewed April correspondence. At the April meeting the HRRC decided to send • out approved response letter; the letter has been sent and no reply was received. In response to the correspondence, HRRC discussed having a presenter come in to talk about an appropriate strategy for addressing potentially discriminating issues as they • arise; possibly at our July or August meeting. Commissioner Kennedy to pursue possible guest speakers. Commissioner Burza suggested to invite author of the correspondence to Community Conversations. Commissioner Burza and Chair Arseneault to work on this follow up communication to the author of correspondence. D. Committee/Working Group Roster Tom Oye Award: Sarah Rinn (Chair), Jan Seidman and Steve Winnick (committee members) Bias Offense Response Plan: Tiffany Sanders (Chair), Jan Seidman and Pat Arseneault (committee members) Affordable Housing: Steve Winnick (Chair), Tony Tian and Maggie Vecchio -Smith (committee members) 25th Anniversary of ADA Commemorative Event: Maggie Vecchio -Smith and Sarah Rinn (Co-chairs) Days of Remembrance: Ellen Kennedy, Jan Seidman and Jasna Burza (committee members) lop Human Right City Designation: Ellen Kennedy (Chair), Steve Winnick, Leslie Lagerstrom, Colleen Feige, and Rachel Carlson (committee members) HRRC will need a representative for the Edina Community Council for a three-year term. Commissioner Winnick's term is ending May 2015; the new three-year term will start in September of 2015. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITION No discussion. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Kennedy thanked HRRC members who attended the World Without Genocide fund raising event. The event was successful and the guest speaker well received. Commissioner Vecchio -Smith would like to look into working with the Edina school group Parent Community Events on having hard conservations with people as part of the 2016 work plan. Commissioner Tian would like to work with the colleges and universities in the twin cities area as we consider events for our 2016 work plan, as he is aware of university -sponsored events that would be of interest to commissioners. Chair Arseneault advised that she attended the Transfer of Memory Exhibit sponsored by the Bloomington Human Rights Commission and was extremely impressed with the presentation. . IX. STAFF COMMENTS Staff Liaison Lamon reminded the Commission that her summer schedule will be changing to Tuesday and Thursdays. Staff Liaison also pointed out that language on the HRRC bylaws under Working Groups outlines that the commission needs to notify the public of the formation of a working group and allow at least 14 days for residents to come forward with interest. X. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Kennedy to adjourn the May 26 meeting. Commissioner Seidman seconded. Meeting adjourned at 9:22pm. Respectfully submitted, MJ Lamon, HRRC Staff Liaison • Minutes Approved by HRRC June 23, 2015 Pat Arseneault, HRRC Chair 0 r • Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w/Quorum Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. "A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously -scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. Inactive - rE Inactive - rE Inactive - tE HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION ..... J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions ..: > 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 NAME Arseneault, Patrice TERM 3/1/2018 1 1 1 I;:. 1 1 ...........(Enter Date) 1 (Enter Date) 6 100% Davis, Laura 3/1/2018 1 1 1 3 50% Kennedy, Ellen 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Sanders, Tiffany 2/1/2017 1 1 1 3 50% Seidman, Jan 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Winnick, Steve 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Tian, Tony 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 100% Vecchio -Smith, Maggie 3/1/2017 ;,\ ._ 1 1 1 1 4 100% Burza, Jasna 3/1/2016 1 1 1 3 83% Rinn, Sarah 3/1/2018 1 1 2 100% Bigbee, Arnie 2/1/2015 1 1 2 33% Gates, Nicole 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 4 67% Weinert, Katrina 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w/Quorum Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting' Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. "A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously -scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. Inactive - rE Inactive - rE Inactive - tE To: From: Date: Subject: Attachments: City Council Human Rights and Relations Commission July 7, 2015 ow o • �, SVP • Item No. X. C. Resolutions of the Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission on Affordable Housing in Edina None. Action Requested: None. Situation: The HRRC Affordable Housing Expanding Opportunity Committee has been tracking the Edina Housing Foundation affordable housing policy as part of the HRRC's 2015 Work Plan. Background: I. The Mission and Purpose of the Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission (HRRC) is to advise and assist the City Council in carrying out the public policy of securing for all residents of the community freedom from discrimination in connection with employment, housing, real property, public accommodations, public services, credit, business, and education. Additionally, the HRRC shall support and improve the human relations climate in the community. 2. The City, Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA), and the Edina Housing Foundation have worked together in seeking implementation of affordable housing goals for the City including the goal of creating 212 new affordable housing units in Edina by the year 2020. The term "affordable housing" as uniformly used has been defined by the MHFA. 3. The City Council has requested that the Edina Housing Foundation recommend an affordable housing policy for the City. The City Council has approved the HRRC's initiative included in its current Work Plan to consider affordable housing in Edina from the human rights and relations perspective. The HRRC formed the Affordable Housing Expanding Opportunity Committee for this purpose. Assessment: Based upon this Background, discussions with the City Development Director and the City Planning Staff, and the HRRC's Committee on Affordable Housing's Reports, the following Resolutions have been adopted by the HRRC for transmission to the City Council to be a part of its consideration of an Affordable Housing Policy for the City. Recommendation/ Resolutions: Page 2U) O �/ tBtlN RESOLVED: That as a matter of City of Edina policy, the City will require that at least 20% of the total of all units in new multi -family housing developments requiring rezoning or variance(s) be sold or rented at an affordable price, as defined from time to time by the MHFA(Affordable Housing). RESOLVED FURTHER: That, if requested, the City will consider Tax Increment Financing for projects that include at least 20% of all units designated for Affordable Housing. RESOLVED FURTHER: That Affordable Housing in the rental market shall remain so for a minimum of 15 years, as memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant for all such developments. RESOLVED FURTHER: That the actions, plans, and goals of the Edina Housing Foundation are endorsed by the HRRC, as these goals also accomplish the HRRC goals to improve the socio-economic and cultural diversity of this community, thereby building a stronger, more vibrant environment for all citizens who live, work, or learn in Edina or who wish to do so. •