Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-09-16 City Council Meeting
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA • CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of September I, 2015 and Work Session Of September I, 2015 B. Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 08/20/2015 TOTAL: • $1,703,071.09 AND Per Pre -List Dated 08/27/2015 TOTAL: $663,702.28 C. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 D. Request For Purchase — Southdale Area Traffic Model And Transportation Study E. Request For Purchase — Authorize Non -Invasive Watermain Pipe Condition Assessment Services F. Resolution No. 2015-87 Supporting A Fund Application Of The City of Bloomington To The Westbound On-ramp To 1-494 At East Bush Lake Road G. Request For Purchase — Emergency Watermain Lining In Parts Of Morningside Neighborhood H. Ordinance No. 2015-17 Adopting The Xcel Energy Franchise Extension Through January 15, 2016 V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Constitution Week Proclamation, Daughters of the Republic, Sarah Patzloff B. Speak Up Edina, August Discussion VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the • interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. Agenda September 16, 2015 Page 2 VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present • to approve except where noted) A. Ordinance No. 2015-18 Amending Chapters 2, 10, 20 and 23 of Edina City Code (First Reading. Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading. Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading. Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) B. Ordinance No. 2015-19 Amending City Code Section 2-274 Schedule A Setting Fees (First Reading. Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading. Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading. Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) C. Ordinance No. 2015-20 Amending Chapter 4 Concerning Alcoholic Beverages (First Reading. Requires offering of Ordinance only.) D. Sketch Plan, West 66th Street & York Avenue E. Affordable Housing Policy F. Resolution Nol. 2015-88 Accepting Donations & Grants G. Accept Solar Garden Proposal VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes: • 1. Park Board, August 11, 2015 2. Heritage Preservation Board, August 11, 2015 IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA JULY 21, 2015 V. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — Southdale Area Traffic Model And Transportation Study . VI. ADJOURNEMNT 0 • Wed Wed Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Wed Wed Tues Wed Tues Tues Thur Fri Tues 0uees s s Thur Fri Agenda September 16, 2015 Page 3 The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Sep 16 Work Session — Edina Community Health Commission 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Arts & Culture Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Sep 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 6 Work Session — Boards & Commission Annual Work Plans 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Oct 20 Work Session — Business Meeting/ 3rd Quarter Work Plan Updates 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Oct 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 3 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Nov 4 Work Session — 2016-17 Budget/Finalize 2016 Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 10 EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCHEON 11;00 A.M. HUGHES PAVILLION 12:30 P.M. CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Nov I I VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Nov 17 Work Session — 2016-17 Human Services Funding 5:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Nov 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Nov 26 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Nov 27 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Dec I Work Session — TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec I Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 8 Special Meeting— Public Improvement Hearing 2016 Construction Projects 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Dec 15 Work Session — Heritage Preservation Board 6:0 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OSBERVED — City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE • EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMEBER I, 2015 5:32 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering roll call were: Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager; Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Devin Massopust, City Management Fellow; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Eric Roggeman, Finance Director; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; and Cary Teague, Community Development Director. Also attending were Nick Anhut and Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associates, Aaron Roseth and Mark Swenson, ESG Architects; Dave Anderson and Dean Williamson, Frauenshuh; and Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects. GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING UPDATE Economic Development Manager Neuendorf, City Manager Neal and Consultant Anderson gave an update on the Grandview former Public Works site. They outlined the history, District Planning Initiative (2010-2012) and the Site Planning (2012-2014). Mr. Neuendorf outlined the architectural concepts, traffic impact and financial overview of the conceptual development to date, based on previous Council direction to follow Scenario 3. • The Council discussed numerous aspects of the proposed redevelopment and seemed to display consensus on the following list of issues: 1) mixed use/public-private, 2) a flexible community multi-purpose/multi- generational building, 3) if possible encompass Arts Center and Senior Center operation allowing existing facilities to achieve different uses, 4) continue with Frauenshuh as potential development partner, 5) community space will require philanthropic contributions and potentially a referendum, 6) lease partnerships will be needed, 8) may consider a limited operating subsidy, and 9) refine the concept and report back. • In order to refine the concept and gather greater detail the Council gave staff direction. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 16, 2015 1 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of August 18, 2015 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated August 20, 2015, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund $1,1 13,550.01; Police Special Revenue $816.15; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $15,265.19; Arts and Culture Fund $5.35; City Hall Debt Service $1,800.00; Working Capital Fund $142,636.68; Equipment Replacement Fund $5,716.78; Cando Fund $10,562.60; Art Center Fund $974.88; Golf Dome Fund $250.00; Aquatic Center Fund $12,610.13; Golf Course Fund $75,323.76; Ice Arena Fund $99,830.78; Sports Dome Fund $4,313.45; Edinborough Park Fund $2,29880; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,702.34; Liquor Fund $52,677.71; Utility Fund $71,518.80; Storm Sewer Fund $48,831.35; Recycling Fund $7.00; PSTF Agency Fund $22,929.67; Centennial TIF District $708.60; Grandview TIF District $2,835.00; Payroll Fund $12,906.06; TOTAL $1,703,071.09 and for receipt of payment of claims dated August 27, 2015, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund $165,415.32; Police Special Revenue $2,002.19; City Hall Debt Service $3,000.00; Working Capital Fund $63,353.02; Equipment Replacement Fund $36,325.03; Art Center Fund $6,007.61; Golf Dome Fund $89.12; Aquatic Center Fund $16,971.80; Golf Course Fund $15,353.27; Ice Arena Fund $13,428.71; Sports Dome Fund $142.75; Edinborough Park Fund $19,937.69; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $6,367.82; Liquor Fund $263,172.87; Utility Fund $49,558.74; Storm Sewer Fund $1,094.65; PSTF Agency Fund $1,386.69; Centennial TIF District $95.00; TOTAL $663,702.28 IV.C. Request for Purchase, Award of Bid Contract ENG 15-13 Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalk Phase 1, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, G.L. Contracting Inc, at $374,779.80 IV.D. Request for Purchase, Liquor Operations POS System, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, RITE at $48,724.31 IV.E. Set December I, 2015 Public Hearing Date for 2016 Levy and Budget IV.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-85, Setting October 6, 2015 Special Assessment Hearings and October 20, 2015 Certificate of Delinquent Utility Hearing • IV.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-82, Approving a Wall Sign Variance at 7301 Ohms Lane by SunOpta IV.H. Adopt Ordinance No. 2015-14, Amending Code Regarding City Council Agendas IV.I. Adopt Ordinance No. 2015-17, Granting Xcel Energy Franchise Extension Rollcall: Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/September 1, 2015 Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. • V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY RESULTS PRESENTATION — PRESENTED Communications and Technology Services Director Bennerotte introduced Damema Mann, National Research Center. Ms. Mann discussed the National Research Center, survey background, survey methods, how to use survey results, areas for improvement, and a summary of key findings. Ms. Mann answered questions of the Council relating to survey selection, weighted results, and the demographics of negative responders. V1. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-86 APPROVING PRELIMINARY 2016 BUDGET AND LEVY — ADOPTED Manager Neal explained that Finance Director Roggeman would be presenting the preliminary 2016 budget and levy. The budget was mainly the same as the one presented to the Council previously and was necessary to carry out the Work Plan. Finance Director Roggeman discussed the definitions, biennial budget process, timeline, challenges, budget summary, HRA levy, and tax comparisons. The total of all levies would increase by 7.07%. Mr. Roggeman answered questions of the Council relating to tax as a percentage of median home value, • other revenue sources, comparable pay for personnel, the decrease in liquor profits, and anomalous figures in the budget. The Council discussed the preliminary 2016 budget and levy and directed staff to provide budget models with a levy of 5% and 6%. The Council also wanted to look into using liquor revenue in other areas and not relying on it for the budget. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-86, Adopting the Proposed Budget for the City of Edina for Year 2016, and Establishing the Proposed Tax Levy Payable in 2016. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-15 AMENDING GAS ENERGY FRANCHISE FEE AND ORDINANCE NO. 2015-16 AMENDING ELECTRIC ENERGY FRANCHISE FEE — FIRST READINGS GRANTED Manager Neal requested the Council consider the first of two readings of ordinances that would increase utility franchise fees for the customers of Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy. The existing franchise fees would increase by $0.50 per month to $1.95 for both utilities. The additional revenue from the fees, $250,000 per year, would be segregated into a new Conservation and Sustainability Fund. Manager Neal answered questions from the Council relating to whether the fee would be separate or combined with the other franchise fees, whether the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund franchise fees could be increased in the future, and if the Energy and Environment Commission had provided input. Member Staunton made a motion to grant First Readings to Ordinance No. 2015-15, . Amending Ordinance No. 2012-15 A Gas Energy Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas ("CenterPoint Energy") for Providing Gas Energy Service within the City of Edina; and, Ordinance No. 2015-I6, Amending Ordinance No. 2012-I6 Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/September I, 2015 Corporation, D/B/A Xcel Energy, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service within the City of Edina. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. PROPOSED POLICY FOR CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY (CAS) FUND — APPROVED Manager Neal explained that the Conservation and Sustainability Fund was a special revenue fund created to account for new utility franchise fees. The 2015 utility franchise fees would be dedicated revenue of the Conservation and Sustainability Fund. Manager Neal discussed eligible expenses, ineligible expenses for the fund, and a new City staff position that would work across all departments to accomplish Conservation and Sustainability Fund goals. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the proposed Conservation and Sustainability Fund Policy. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried VII.D. PARTNERS IN ENERGY PROGRAM PLANNING TEAM — APPOINTED Manager Neal explained that the Council was requested to appoint three at -large citizen members to the Partners in Energy Program Planning Team. The Council discussed the student volunteer and whether to add a fourth member. The Council each listed their recommended appointees and tallied the results. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, appointing Carolyn Jackson, Roy Jenson, Marshall Silberstein, and Rozy Eastaugh (student) to the Partners in Energy Program Planning Team. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried VILE. SKETCH PLAN BEST BUY SITE, 3101 66TH STREET WEST — DIRECTION PROVIDED TO PROPONENT Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague explained that the Council was asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the two -acre parcel at 3101 66th Street West and 6612 Xerxes Avenue. The proponent was proposing to tear down the vacant Best Buy building and single family home, and redevelop with a six -story 210 unit apartment with a 3,800 square foot restaurant. To accommodate the request, two Comprehensive Plan amendments were needed including building height from 4 -stories to 6 -stories and housing density from 75 units per acre to 104. Proponent Presentation Kurt Krumenauer, Midwest Apartment Broker, introduced Pete Keely, Collage Architects. Mr. Keely discussed design ideas, presented drawings, and talked about where the project was at currently. He shared that they were in the process of hiring a traffic management consultant to help address some of those concerns and the plan was to have larger units in order to answer the demands of the market. Mr. Keely answered questions of the Council relating to where the Promenade ended and walkability. The Council pointed out the Greater Southdale Area Nine Guiding Principles and encouraged the developers to address each principle. The Council indicated support of the building design and the setback, but preferred a sidewalk all the way around the building. The Council expressed concern with the properties located near the site and noted the traffic study would be important. VII.F. GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA STUDY WORK GROUP ADDITIONS —APPOINTED Mr. Teague shared that the Work Group had been interviewing candidates and introduced Michael Schroeder, Greater Southdale Area Study Work Group Member. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/September I, 2015 Mr. Schroeder explained that seven potential candidates had been identified and interviewed. Four additional members were recommended including Joel Stegner, Don Hutchison, and Chris Cooper from the public and Claudia Carr from the Planning Commission. The Council thanked Mr. Schroeder for his work and all who applied. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, appointing public members Joel Stegner, Don Hutchison, and Chris Cooper and Planning Commissioner Claudia Carr to the Greater Southdale Area Study Work Group. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried VII.G. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-84 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-84 accepting various grants and donations. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII►. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. MINUTES: • 1. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, JULY 9, 2015 2. EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, MAY 4 AND JULY 7, 2015 3. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, JULY 28, 2015 4. PLANNING COMMISSION, AUGUST 12,201S Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XI.A. DIRECTION FOR GRANDVIEW FORMER PUBLIC WORKS SITE X11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:29 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 16, 2015. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the September I, 2015, meeting available. Page 4 • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1903 9/3/2016 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY T 2,228.42 WARTHOG NOZZLE 00001602 380863 0144649 -IN 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 2,228.42 1904 9/3/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 96.00 381111 1922366 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 79.10 380919 1924676 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 43.20 381112 1924681 5862.5516, COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 26.00 381272 1926181 5822.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 59.60 381273 6100169939 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 46.92- CREDIT ON ACCT 381113 CUST 04013 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 256.98 1905 9/3/2015 100676 ALL SAFE INC. 31.25 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 380965 139749 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 66.45 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 380966 139750 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 31.25 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 380967 139751 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 128.95 1906 9/3/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 432.11 COFFEE 360864 1190891 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 133.11 WATER FILTER 381226 9356684 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 116.14 COFFEE 381225 9358988 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 681.36 1907 9/3/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 171.10 380924 49737000 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 53.10 381280 49737200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 123.55 381114 49737300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.55 381115 49737400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 435.55 381281 49829000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 454.94 381117 6581900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 47.36 381130 92446300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19.15- 381131 92519800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 122.87 380926 92565800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 57.62 380925 92566000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 81.33 381116 92566100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 118.54 381282 92602700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,683.36 1908 913/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1908 9/3/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued... 90.58 FILE FOLDERS, STORAGE BOXES 381081 OE -402155-1 1140.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 125.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 380973 OE -403972-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 268.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003189 380869 WO -137212-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.99 MAILING LABELS 380870 WO -999201-1 1190.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 506.81 1909 913/2015 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 50.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 380974 110696 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50.26 1910 9/312015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 142.80 COOLANT 00005607 380871 987170 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 142.80 1911 9/3/2015 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 298.00 380930 203749 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,221.40 381285 205906 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,519.40 1912 913/2015 104020 DALCO 101.50- CREDIT 381160 2912942 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 785.84 CAN LINERS, WIPES, SOAP 00009431 381241 2917496 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 101.50 AEROSOL STAINLESS CLEANER 381159 2920342 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 320.44 TISSUE, CAN LINERS 381161 2921294 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 401.20 TOWELS 00009431 381240 2921883 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 457.40 TISSUE DISPENSERS, AIR CARE 380981 2923119 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,964.88 1913 9/3/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 92.20 380931 816393 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 442.25 381060 817332 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 49.20 381061 817333 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,182.15 381062 617419 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,035.25 361286 817454 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5,801.05 1914 9/3/2015 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 159.03 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 380879 742325104 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 159.03 0 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 2 Business Unit PLANNING SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1916 9/3/2015 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. Continued... 210.00 380932 13023 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 210.00 1916 9/3/2015 124541 GEYEN GROUP 235.13 CARPET, CHAIRS CLEANED 381170 24895 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 235.13 1917 9/3/2015 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 1,631.00 FIELD PAINT 00001534 380993 108131 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 1,631.00 1918 9/3/2015 131734 HORWITZ INC. 2,219.43 HEAT PUMP REPAIRS 380994 W35199 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,219.43 1919 9/3/2015 129508 IMPACT 3,442.59 MAILAUG 2015 WATER BILLS 380887 105351 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,442.59 1920 9/3/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 269.60 PVC, FITTINGS 00001597 381205 939077 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 269.60 1921 9/3/2015 121076 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 59.50 TOILET RENTAL 380995 92910 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 38.25 380996 92934 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 60.56 TOILET RENTAL 381172 93051 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 158.31 1922 9/3/2016 101483 MENARDS 27.94 DIAMOND BLADE 00001577 380999 93811 1301.6556 TOOLS 12.59 WALLCLOCK 00001578 381208 93816 1330.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 12.59- RETURN 381209 93911 1330.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 14.98 CLOCK 00001595 381210 93912 1330.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 41.85 CONCRETE MIX 00001599 381178 93946 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 84.77 1923 9/3/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 192.40 640 SPRINKLERS 00001551 381008 1031483-00 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 192.40 0 w 9/1/2D15 10:15:36 Page - 3 Business Unit YORK SELLING CLUB HOUSE FIELD MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE DISTRIBUTION LITTER REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS TRAFFIC SIGNALS TRAFFIC SIGNALS BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE 0 • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # , Doc No Inv No Account No 1923 9/3/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1924 9/3/2015 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 64,535.40 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381372 ARDEN PARK 2,292.82 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381372 ARDEN PARK 79,036.07 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381372 ARDEN PARK 80,028.01 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381372 ARDEN PARK 331,544.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381372 ARDEN PARK 138,475,06 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381372 ARDEN PARK 139,176.63 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381372 ARDEN PARK 299,418.54 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381372 ARDEN PARK 102,380.58 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381370 COUNTRYSIDE 268,533.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381370 COUNTRYSIDE 52,302.21 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381370 COUNTRYSIDE 61,338.95 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381370 COUNTRYSIDE 258,316.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381370 COUNTRYSIDE 31,303.21 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381371 DEWEY HILL 32,437.96 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381371 DEWEY HILL 52,220.67 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381371 DEWEY HILL 53,720.89 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381371 DEWEY HILL 252,866.66 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381371 DEWEY HILL 2,299,927.88 1925 9/3/2015 129486 PAPCO INC. 122.62 TISSUE 381260 94431 32.18 BATTERY FILLER BOTTLE 381259 94686 154.80 1926 9/3/2015 119486 PARAGON BLACK DIRT 2,484.00 STREET SWEEPINGS DISPOSAL 381261 5878 2,484.00 1927 9/3/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 519.58 TIRES 00005552 381214 210183833 299.75 TIRES 00005573 381016 210189195 819.33 1928 9/3/2015 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. 327.00 FLANGE 381017 4125 147.00 AIRBAG 381018 4126 474.00 07127.1705.30 01412.1705.30 01416.1705.30 10096,1705.30 01412.1705.30 03487.1705,30 05551.1705.30 04407.1705.30 07128.1705.30 01413.1705.30 05552.1705.30 03488.1705.30 04409.1705.30 01415.1705.30 01414.1705.30 05553.1705.30 03489.1705.30 04410.1705.30 7411.6511 7411.6511 1301.6182 1553.6583 1553.6583 1553.6530 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description Continued... CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVAL TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 0 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page- 4 S127 ARDEN PARK D SIDEWALK GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR BR6 54TH STREET BRIDGE GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON Arden Park D Reconstruction Arden Park D Reconstruction 54TH ST RECONSTRUCTION S128 COUNTRYSIDE H SIDEWALK EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON Countryside H Reconstruction Countryside H Reconstruction Countryside H Reconstruction HYDE PARK NHOOD RECON HOLLANDS NHOOD RECON Prospect Knolls B Reconstructs Prospect Knolls B Reconstruct! Prospect Knolls B Reconstruct! PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OFEDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1928 9/3/2015 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. Continued... 1929 9/3/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 53.16 PAPER PLATES 381265 8306 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 68.15 TISSUE 381265 8306 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 444.46 NITRILE GLOVES, CAN LINERS 00002251 381266 8308 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 565.77 1930 9/3/2015 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 602.92 REPAIRS TO DRINKING FOUNTAIN 00002062 381356 66501 5765.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 602.92 1931 9/3/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 249.10 ENGINEERING DEPT ENVELOPES 381181 87482 1550.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 58.50 BUSINESS CARDS 381182 87494 1550.64D6 GENERAL SUPPLIES 307.60 1932 9/3/2015 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 66.07 SCREWS 00001584 381216 41327731 1301.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 66.07 1933 9/3/2015 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 4,000.00 SCADA PROGRAMMING 381269 1559 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,000.00 1934 9/3/2015 104672 SPRINT 16.62 381184 873184124 1552.6186 TELEPHONE 33.24 381184 873184124 1553.6188 TELEPHONE 49.12 381184 873184124 1140.6188 TELEPHONE 74.98 381184 873184124 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 101.44 381184 873164124 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 121.94 381184 873184124 1322.6188 TELEPHONE 199.95 381184 873184124 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 234.98 381184 873184124 1301.6188 TELEPHONE 288.37 381184 873184124 1640.6188 TELEPHONE 21.62 381184 873184124 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 16.62 361184 873184124 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 352.09 381184 873184124 5910.6168 TELEPHONE 16.62 381184 873184124 7411.6168 TELEPHONE 1, 527.59 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page- 5 Business Unit POOLCONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS PROMENADE EXPENSES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PLANNING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) PSTF OCCUPANCY 1938 0 50TH ST SELLING 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING • COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 380953 401640-00 CITY OF EDINA 381148 402129-00 424.40 Council Check Register by GL 402130-00 953.90 381128 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2,998.75 v 396843 9/3/2015 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 105696 3CMA Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1935 9/3/2015 690.00 101004 SPS COMPANIES 396844 Continued... 124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST 544.67 PIPE 00001567 381023 S3129992.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 380964 8408999 544.67 2,836.62 1936 9/3/2015 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 107.52 134.80 METAL FABRICATION 000D1518 381025 29396 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 274.00 PUMP HANDLES 00001553 381024 29401 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 408.80 14,420.00 SWITCHER FOR COUNCIL CHAMERS0004052 381095 INV95355 1937 9/3/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 396847 9/3/2015 1938 9/3/2015 50TH ST SELLING 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,286.15 5862.5513 380953 401640-00 334.30 381148 402129-00 424.40 361334 402130-00 953.90 381128 402290-00 2,998.75 v 396843 9/3/2015 105696 3CMA 690.00 CONFERENCE- J.BENNEROTTE 381223 SEPT 9-11 690.00 396844 9/3/2015 124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST 2,836.62 JANITORIAL SERVICE 380964 8408999 2,836.62 396845 9/312015 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 107.52 ALARM MONITORING 381224 55925463' 107.52 396846 9/3/2015 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 14,420.00 SWITCHER FOR COUNCIL CHAMERS0004052 381095 INV95355 14,420.00 396847 9/3/2015 137003 AMARA WINES LLC 228.42 381274 8933 228.42 396848 913/2015 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX • 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page- 6 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 1551.6103 5111.625D 421130.6710 5862.5513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ALARM SERVICE CITY HALL GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 ROAD PANELS 360970 115408 CITY OF EDINA CONCRETE B02.25 9/1/2015 10:15:36 380969 115513 5932.6520 CONCRETE Council Check Register by GL SIDEWALK Page- 7 115653 1301.6520 CONCRETE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary CURB 380972 115753 5932.6520 CONCRETE 4,344.25 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396848 9/3/2016 127366AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY Continued... 105.40 FILTERS 00005666 380968 AFS -252360016 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.40 396849 9/3/2015 101479 AMERICAN SERVICES CORP. 594.64 REPLACED MOTOR STARTER 381156 4072 5861.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 594.64 396850 9/3/2015 114476 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 48.28 MONITORING SERVICE 381199 189355 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.28 396851 9/3/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 993.75 380922 3049540 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 286.50 380921 3049542 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,024.50 380920 3049544 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 306.00 381279 3050924 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 382.50 381275 3050925 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 96.00 381277 3050926 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 837.50 381276 3050927 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 689.00 381278 3050928 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 15.96- 381054 321937 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6.36--381055 321938 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,593.43 396852 9/3/2015 120996 AVR INC. 1,395.50 ROAD PANELS 360970 115408 1314.6520 CONCRETE B02.25 CURB 380969 115513 5932.6520 CONCRETE 1,600.25 SIDEWALK 380971 115653 1301.6520 CONCRETE 546.25 CURB 380972 115753 5932.6520 CONCRETE 4,344.25 396853 9/3/2015 136687 BALLANTINE PAINTING 319.00 OFFICE PAINTING 381157 1002 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 319.00 396854 9/3/2015 102196 BATTERIES PLUS STREET RENOVATION GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL STORM SEWER CITY HALL GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.60 BATTERIES 00003190 380865 018-380696 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.85 BATTERIES 00003192 380867 018-380915 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.91 BATTERIES 00003193 380866 018-380916 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 162.36 STREET RENOVATION GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL STORM SEWER CITY HALL GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396854 9/3/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS Continued... 396856 9/3/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 185.00 380923 3006 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 353.00 381056 3139 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 538.00 396856 9/3/2016 136992 BAXTER MECHANICAL INC. 1,910.00 INSTALL CLEANOUT 00001606 380868 6446 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,910.00 396857 9/3/2016 101343 BEHR, JASON 128.25 BOARDING K9 381341 080615 4607.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 74.81 BOARDING K9 381342 082315 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 203.06 396868 9/3/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 20.00 380927 240544 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 462.40 380928 240545 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 356.00 380929 240547 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 838.40 396859 9/3/2015 103832 BLACK & DECKER U.S. INC. 41.62 MASONRY DRILL BITS 00001548 381228 02069763 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 269.47 BATTERIES FOR DRILLS 00001574 381229 02069830 1325.64D6 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 311.09 396860 9/3/2015 130602 BOOM ISLAND BREWING COMPANY LLC 352.00 381283 4234 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 352.00 396861 9/3/2015 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 414.00 - 381284 128531 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 677.18 381118 128544 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 260.00 381132 128546 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,351.18 396862 9/3/2016 136993 BRAUN INTERTEC GEOTHERMAL LLC 30,894.08 LEAK DETECTION AND REPAIR 380975 GOOD280 450004.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW GEOTHERMAL'REPAIRS 30,894.08 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396863 9/3/2016 136997 BRENNEN, NORMA E Continued... 1,512.20 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381105 082515 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,512.20 396864 9/3/2015 132976 BUCKLEY, TOM 121.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 380976 082415 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 121.99 396865 9/3/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 29.50 381059 00011007 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 833.45 381057 670787 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,440.10 381058 671617 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,303.05 396866 9/3/2015 112811 CASTREJON INC. 14,407.50 FIBER EXPANSION AT SCHOOL RD 381227 11695 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING 14,407.50 396867 9/3/2015 136602 CEDAR CREEK CAPITAL LLC 106.27 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381343 5837 YORKAVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 106.27 396868 9/3/2015 101515 GEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 926.00 STREET PANELS 381200 C1544180 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 926.00 396869 9/3/2015 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 32.23 10089900-4 381191 10089900-8/15 1646.6166 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 87.51 10437426-9 381082 10437426-8/15 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 210.74 5546504-1 361193 5546504-8/15 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 87.51 5563827-4 381085 5563827-8/15 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 191.16 5584304-9 381233 5584304-8/15 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 17.90 5584310-6 381231 5584310-8/15 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 29.77 5590919-6 381232 5590919-8/15 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 1,360.48 5591458-4 381192 5591458-8/15 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 20.16 5596524-8 381194 5596524-8/15 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 158.36 8034001-1 381083 8034001-8/15 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.03 9546705-6 381230 9546705-8/15 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 482.99 9724639-1 381084 9724639-8/15 5511.61 B6 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,697.86 0 194.19 • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 396871 9/3/2015 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL 00103426-0345052006 380977 345052006-8/15 1552.6189 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5,113.21 9/3/2015 — 9/3/2015 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396870 9/3/2015 199.00 123898 CENTURYLINK 380979 IN00010618 Continued... 58.82 952 920-1586 381189 1586-8/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 1401.6104 76.55 952922-2444 381190 2444-8/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 58.82 952 920-8632 381234 8632-6/15 5913.6188 TELEPHONE SEWER & WATER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES BLACKTOP GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CRAFT SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CAR WASH 0 9/1/2016 10:15:36 Page - 10 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL STREET RENOVATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CRBPS Energy Analytics EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 194.19 396871 9/3/2015 122084 CITY OF EDINA -UTILITIES 5,113.21 00103426-0345052006 380977 345052006-8/15 1552.6189 5,113.21 396872 9/3/2015 101860 CITY OF ST. PAUL 199.00 PDI TRAINING 380979 IN00010618 1400.6104 699.00 PDI TRAINING 380978 IN00010626 1401.6104 898.00 396873 9/3/2015 124829 CLARY BUSINESS MACHINES CO. 100.90 SHRED BAGS 381158 36982 1550.6406 100.90 396874 9/3/2015 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 17,389.17 HOT MIX 381235 150815 1314.6518 17,389.17 396875 9/3/2015 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 1,881.00 CHAIN SAWS, BLADES 00003653 381093 100525 1470.6406 1,881.00 396876 9/3/2015 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 300.00 KILN PARTS 00009427 381237 INV000101009 5111.6530 249.70 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 381238 INV000101696 5110.6564 129.08 CLAY 00009428 381236 R200402335 5110.6564 678.78 396877 9/3/2015 137004 CR -BPS INC. 2,400.00 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE 381239 EDINA001-01 450007.6710 2,400.00 396878 9/3/2015 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 66.00 JULY 2015 WASHES 380872 433202 1553.6238 68.00 SEWER & WATER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES BLACKTOP GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CRAFT SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CAR WASH 0 9/1/2016 10:15:36 Page - 10 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL STREET RENOVATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CRBPS Energy Analytics EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 — 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396879 9/3/2015 134475 DR HORTON INC Continued... 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 381345 5932 ZENITH AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 396880 9/3/2015 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. _ 128.87 BUMPER NOZZLE 380980 12988 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 128.87 396881 9/312015 101581 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE 750.00 DRIVER TRAINING 381094 00128010 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 750.00 396882 9/3/2015 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC. 224.01 DRYER, COMP 00005664 380873 4-204325 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 224.01 396883 9/3/2015 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 168.01 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 381096 082615 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 168.01 396884 9/3/2015 106066 DENNIS ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATIONS 1,690.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 381104 PENTAGON PARK 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1,690.00 396885 9/312015 137006 DEVROY, LOIS 25.93 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381344 4725 VALLEY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VIEW RD 25.93 396886 9/3/2015 118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC. 24.86 ROUND TUBE, ROLLS 00001568 380874 4005354 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 24.86 396887 9/3/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 44.68 PUBLISH NOTICE 381346 242751 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 44.68 PUBLISH NOTICE 381347 244946 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 178.72 ANNUAL TIF DISCLOSURE 380876 247151 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 122.87 AD FOR BID 380875 247152 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 390.95 396888 9/3/2015 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. • s � R55CKR2 LOGIS� CITY OF EDI• 9/1/2015.5:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396888 9/3/2015 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. Continued... 311.01 IMAGES OF EDINAAWARDS 380877 95005 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 311.01 396889 9/3/2015 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,000.00 2014AARBITRAGE MONITORING 381195 68465 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 2,000.00 396890 9/3/2015 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,745.36 DWI GRANT VEHICLE BUILDUP 380982 TB0072H 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,745.36 396891 9/3/2015 137000 EXOTEC CANADA INC. 94,002.50 WATERMAIN CLEANING 381369 ENG 15-10NB 05556.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Morningside Water Main Lining 94,002.50 396892 9/3/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 120.94 ROTOR ASSEMBLY 381163 1-4772035 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.02 SPARK PLUGS, OIL SEAL, KIT 381162 69-189598 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 158.58 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, BRAKE KIT 380878 69-190487 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 412.06 BRAKE LINING KITS, ROTOR ASSY 381166 69-190855 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 321.49 RESISTOR, CONNECTOR, V -BELTS 381201 69-190868 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.03 BRANDED FRICTION 381164 69-190875 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 192.60 ROTORS, BRAKE LINING KIT 381165 69-190882 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.62 SEALS 380983 69-190929 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.18 WHEEL SEAL 381168 69-190983 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.44 OIL PAN SEAL 381202 69-191178 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.18 WHEEL SEAL 381167 70-242525 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,505.14 396893 9/3/2015 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,080.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 381242 082615 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,080.00 396894 9/3/2015 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 20.74 T -ROD, NUTS 00001520 380984 MNTC2132221 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 20.74 396895 9/3/2015 136996 FELSING, SHIRLEYA 2.35 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 361106 082515 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2.35 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation P0# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396895 9/3/2015 136996 FELSING, SHIRLEYA Continued... 396896 9/3/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 939.92 CS PARTS 00001554 380985 0157826 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 939.92 396897 9/3/2015 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 598.00 WINDOW CLEANING 361086 2315-11797 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 598.00 396898 9/3/2015 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 179.15 CAMERA PARTS 00001609 380986 19079 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS 179.15 396899 9/3/2015 100769 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 247.00 LOCK REPAIR 00001610 380987 1083860 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 191.49 DOOR LOCK REPAIRS 381169 1065184 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS 436.49 396900 9/3/2015 136999 GEBBE, BRUCE 19.23 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381108 5700 DREWAVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 19.23 396901 9/3/2015 136953 GENESIS REMODELING LLC 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 381098 5501 DONCASTER 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT WAY 2,500.00 396902 9/3/2015 130052 GLOWSHOT TARGETS LLC 590.02 TARGETS 381243 1364 7414.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 590.02 396903 9/3/2015 101103 GRAINGER 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 13 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SEWER CLEANING WELL HOUSES CLUB HOUSE UTILITY BALANCE SHEET INSPECTIONS PUBLIC PROGRAMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.80 SAFETY GLASSES 00005633 380864 9818039696 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 9.56 BEE STING GEL 00005569 360885 9618312457 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 232.14 SPRAYERS 00005634 380883 9818961568 1553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 275.20 NITRILE GLOVES 00001499 380988 9820259399 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 504.60 GLOVES, LIFTING BELTS 00005581 380989 9820881432 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.80 BOOT SCRAPER 00001572 380990 9821196178 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 86.92 KEY CABINET 00005637 380882 9822065729 1553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 71.68 HOLE SAWARBORS 00005637 380880 9822295771 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 13 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SEWER CLEANING WELL HOUSES CLUB HOUSE UTILITY BALANCE SHEET INSPECTIONS PUBLIC PROGRAMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/1/2015.5:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice 8 Summary 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396903 9/3/2015 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 1,272.45 MIG WELDER 00005638 380881 9822519402 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,560.15 396904 9/3/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 460.50 360933 185770 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 92.25 361288 185772 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 316.50 361287 186001 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 913.50 381119 186003 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 362.25 381289 186005 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,145.00 396905 9/3/2015 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 504.35 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00001614 381203 152661 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 504.35 396906 9/3/2015 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 549.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 381244 081315 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 549.00 396907 9/3/2015 136995 GRIFFITHS, ROBERT H 25.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381107 082515 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 396908 9/3/2015 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 351.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 381245 081315 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 351.00 396909 9/3/2015 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 456.32 RADIATOR, BULBS 380886 146849 1314,6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 456.32 396910 9/3/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,174.96 CHEMICALS 00005285 380991 3767633 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,174.96 396911 9/3/2015 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 15.00 PENTAGON KEY 00001536 380992 E349752 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15.00 396912 9/3/2015 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG R55CKR2 LOGIS101 360934 778741 5862.5514 CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 54.00 380935 778742 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register by GL 1,601.50 381290 780084 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 381063 780085 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,172.50 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 780330 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396912 9/3/2015 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG Continued... 2,500.00 14,770.95 BLDG DEPT REMODEL 381087 567753 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,234.32 OFFICE REMODEL 381246 570708 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 396918 16,005.27 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 396913 9/3/2015 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 310.00 381291 32097 5822.5514 1,680.00 REPLACEMENT MONITORS 00004366 381171 56292782 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 381135 32125 1,680.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,086.00 396914 9/3/2015 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 396919 9/3/2015 134953 INDIGITAL 201.81 SANITIZER, PORCELAIN CLEANER 00002252 381248 601744941 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 3,353.88 97.98 HOSEANDASSEMBLY 00002253 381247 700197409 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 299.79 396915 9/3/2015 9/3/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page- 15 Business Unit ,JUl%I HNUCIVuir-0 CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,281.00 360934 778741 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 54.00 380935 778742 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,601.50 381290 780084 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 686.00 381063 780085 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,172.50 381133 780330 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 58.00 381134 780331 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TREES & MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT 0 0 9 8,055.00 396916 9/3/2015 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 410.55 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 381204 082615 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 410.55 396917 9/3/2015 135331 ICON HOMES LLC 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 381348 5804 YORKAVE S 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 396918 9/3/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 310.00 381291 32097 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 776.00 381135 32125 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,086.00 396919 9/3/2015 134953 INDIGITAL 3,353.88 DOCUMENT SCANNING 380888 11013 4418.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,353.88 396920 9/3/2015 100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC TREES & MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENT 0 0 9 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF ED 9/1/2015.5:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396920 9/3/2015 100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC Continued... 1,426.49 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 380890 R001104755:01 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,426.49 396921 9/3/2015 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 2,300.00 4 UNITS 380889 507096 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 2,300.00 396922 9/3/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 12.00- 380941 2364093 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,514.85 380940 2396888 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 32.00 380938 2396889 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 984.45 380936 2396892 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 54.80 380937 2396893 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 7,132.14 380939 2396902 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,011.15 381294 2396929 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,241.85 381064 2396931 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,248.20 361292 2396938 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 60.30 381293 2396939 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 213.00 381173 2412452 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 25,480.74 396923 9/3/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 374.68 380942 5238548 5822.6513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,176.95 380943 5238551 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,136.85 380944 5238554 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,839.51 361297 5243961 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,379.00 381300 5243962 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 630.48 381299 5243963 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 79.66 381298 5243964 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 185.98 381295 5243966 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 494.80 381296 5243967 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 330.80 381314 5243968 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 133.48 381304 5243969 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.16 381303 5243970 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,096.99 381315 5243972 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,060.90 381313 5243973 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 514.36 381309 5243974 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.41 361310 5243976 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,942.07 381312 5243978 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,823.52 381311 5243979 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396923 9/3/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,614.51 381302 5243983 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,539.68 381308 5243964 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 505.91 381306 5243985 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 254.56 381305 5243987 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,244.48 381301 5243988 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,293.11 381307 5243989 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 32.38- 381316 537199 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 25.66- 381120 537200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 63.44- 381137 537381 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 20.00- 361136 537382 5842.5613 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10.00- 381121 537384 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 19.71- 381122 537385 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 30.00- 381138 537678 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3.45- 381124 536280 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6.54 381139 538282 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8.33- 381140 538283 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5.67- 381141 538284 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3.45- 381123 538285 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 30.00- 381317 538978 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 28,430.42 396924 9/3/2015 116901 K.C. GROVES TREE EXPERTS 3,175.34 TREE REMOVAL 00001575 380997 5818 XERXES 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,175.34 396925 9/3/2016 111018 KEEPRS INC. 336.40 UNIFORMS 00003642 381088 283660-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 167.96 UNIFORMS 00003651 381089 284939-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 504.36 396926 9/3/2015 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 81.00 KEYS 381174 S1022530 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 81.00 - 396927 9/3/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 5,572.47 SO RAMP GARBAGE SCREENING 360998 6692797 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5,572.47 396928 9/3/2015 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 0 805.50 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 361249 081315 05401,4602 LESSONS 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 17 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING GOLFREVENUE* R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDI• 9/1/2015.5:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396926 9/3/2016 116192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE Continued... 805.50 396929 9/3/2015 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC. 369.89 GRAVEL 00001582 381206 246909 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 369.89 396930 9/3/2015 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 324.25 UNIFORM SHIRTS 381175 SIN2905317 5822.6406 i GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 324.25 UNIFORM SHIRTS 381175 SIN2905317 5642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 324.25 UNIFORM SHIRTS 381175 SIN2905317 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 113.85 381176 SIN2987938 5862.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,086.60 396931 9/3/2016 137011 LANDSCAPES UNLIMITED LLC 249,606.77 GOLF COURSE RENOVATION 381365 APPL 1 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 249,606.77 396932 9/3/2015 137001 LANGENFELD, THOMAS 49.11 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381177 5929 GRIMES AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 49.11 396933 9/3/2015 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 595.60 BITS, SCREWS, NUTS 00005603 380891 9303486587 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 595.60 396934 9/3/2015 112094 LINDHOLM, ANGELA 73.93 BIRTHDAY CAKES 381250 082715 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 73.93 396935 9/3/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 367.15 CURTAINS, DEFLECTORS 00005668 381207 2154741 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 367.15 396936 9/3/2015 131118 MANION, CHARLES JOHN 234.00 OFFICIATING FEES 381349 083115 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 234.00 396937 9/3/2015 102241 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IMPORTS INC. 809.00 381125 20018721 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 809.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 396937 9/3/2015 396938 9/3/2015 396939 9/3/2015 396940 9/3/2015 396941 9/3/2015 396942 9/3/2015 396943 9/3/2015 396944 9/3/2015 396945 9/3/2015 0 0 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 19 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION WELL HOUSES CENT SERV GEN - MIS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 — 9/3/2015 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 102241 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IMPORTS INC. Continued.,. 137002 MELTWATER NEWS US INC. 4,000.00 MELTWATER SUBSCRIPTION 381196 IN -S151-422897 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,000.00 102281 MENARDS 184.80 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001570 381000 93903 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 363.93 LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 00001645 381251 94332 5912.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 548.73 104650 MICRO CENTER 579.98 PC REPLACEMENT 381252 5707387 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 579.98 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 4,987.50 NEW WATER SERVICE 00001607 380892 35023 5913.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,422.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001603 380893 35026 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,422.50 WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 00001613 381001 35027 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,282.50 WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 00001611 381002 35028 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,995.00 WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 00001612 381003 35029 5913.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 13,110.00 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC, 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 381255 928042511 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 16.09 WINDOW CLEANING 381254 928042512 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5.36 WINDOW CLEANING 381253 928042932 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 42.83 137010 MINNESOTA CANINE CONSULTING LLC 250.00 COURSE FEE 3B1351 SEAN YOUNG 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 250.00 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 149.44 SWIVEL CASTERS 00005428 381366 14906 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 149.44 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 117.60 GLAZE 010009432 381256 84665 5110.6564 CRAFTSUPPLIES 117.60 0 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 19 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION WELL HOUSES CENT SERV GEN - MIS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396946 9/3/2015 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT Continued... 8,935.00 SWEEPSTER BROOM 00005184 381004 E05454 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 8,935.00 396947 9/3/2015 123909 MINNESOTA SODDING CO LLC 4,899.62 TOPDRESSING AT COURTNEY FIELDS 381005 7662 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 3,845.87 TOPDRESSING AT HIGHLAND PARK 381006 7667 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 3,012.45 TOPDRESSINGAT STRAUCHER PARK 381211 7668 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 11, 757.94 396948 9/3/2015 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 18.34 PLUGS, PIPE, ELBOW 00005635 380894 0111384 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.00 BRASS VALVES 00001583 381007 0111409 -IN 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 208.71 FLOJET SWITCH 00001648 381212 0111463 -IN 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 275.05 396949 9/3/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 71.36 POSTERS 361257 18341 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 49.00 STREET SMART POSTERS 381009 18387 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 120.36 396950 9/3/2015 137009 MIRELEZ, ALISON 156.00 ART CLASS REFUND 381350 16811 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 156.00 396951 9/3/2015 123742 MOELLER, SCOTT 100.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381109 5645 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET INTERLACHEN 100.00 396952 9/3/2015 130266 MUNICODE 849.50 SUPPLEMENTS, UPDATES 380895 00259221 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 849.50 396953 9/3/2015 137008 NECKVATAL, SALLY 130.00 ART WORK SOLD 381352 082515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 130.00 396954 9/3/2015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 339.00 381318 102702 - 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 339.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 — 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396954 9/3/2015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. Continued... 396955 9/3/2015 136978 NEW OLD HOUSE COMPANY, THE 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 381099 5517 OAKLAWN 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 396956 9/3/2015 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 340.66 LETTERS FOR SIGNS 00001480 360896 TI -0288819 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 340.66 396957 9/3/2015 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 422.30 BALLFIELD LIGHTS 00001552 381010 90716 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 422.30 396958 9/3/2015 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 110.20 LED W/FLASHER, LENS 361011 39484 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.20 396959 9/3/2015 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 2,000.00 WINSCRIBE LICENSE/INSTALL 381012 IN60482 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,258.00. WINSCRIBE LICENSE/INSTALL 381012 IN60482 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,318.00 WINSCRIBE EQUIPMENT CONTRACT 381013 IN60949 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6,576.00 396960 9/3/2015 134814 NUVEEN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 6,586.36 2ND QTR FEE 361090 132121 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 6,586.36 396961 9/3/2015 105612 OFFICE TEAM 297.00 TEMP 381258 43601856 7410.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 297.00 396962 9/3/2015 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 21.23 STRAP REPAIR 00001596 381213 566185 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 21.23 396963 9/3/2016 101659 ORKIN 20.00 PEST CONTROL 381354 104380308 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 20.00 PESTCONTROL 381353 104380311 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 40.00 0 • 0 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 22 Business Unit TREES & MAINTENANCE 381126 15086 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 396966 9/3/2015 0 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 12.65 CITY OF EDINA 36.25 1400.6235 381067 Council Check Register by GL 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 082515 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 381066 8512569 -IN 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396963 9/3/2015 101659 .ORKIN Continued... 396964 9/3/2015 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 381127 8512604 -IN 446.77 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 381014 082115 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 37.81 446.77 381319 8512789 -IN 396965 9/3/2015 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 9,078.70 0 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 22 Business Unit TREES & MAINTENANCE 381126 15086 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 396966 9/3/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 12.65 380898 36.25 1400.6235 381067 8512588 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 082515 3,456.57 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 381066 8512569 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1490.6107 1,373.75 PUBLIC HEALTH 381065 8512594 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,174.32 119.02 381127 8512604 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 37.81 380898 381319 8512789 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 9,078.70 396967 9/3/2015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 161.02 381264 50197338 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 217.52 381179 50197358 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 378.54' 396968 9/3/2015 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 275.00 EDITION EDINA DESIGN 380897 081815-5 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 275.00 396969 9/3/2015 117087 PETERSON COMPANIES 16,285.45 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381373 PROMENADE 4 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 126,724.96 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381373 PROMENADE 4 01251.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 87,120.70 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381373 PROMENADE 4 04401.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 138,163.27 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 381373 PROMENADE 4 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 368,294.38 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GRILL COMMUNICATIONS PACS IS A-251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE PROMENADE H2O FEATURE&PATH CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 396970 9/3/2015 103512 PETTY CASH 12.65 380898 082515 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 13.50 380898 082515 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19.35 380898 082515 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 64.24 380898 082515 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 119.02 380898 082515 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 289.71 380898 082515 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 396970 9/3/2015 103612 PETTY CASH Continued... 5822.5513 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 1470.6160 1647.6103 1335.6532 5913.6201 1553.6610 1621.6103 0 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 23 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 518.47 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 396971 9/3/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 540.70 YORK SELLING 380945 2838318 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 122.32 VERNON SELLING 380946 2838319 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 595.80 380947 2838323 364.47 381327 2841816 152.52 381326 2841817 138.32 381328 2841818 105.16 381320 2841819 3,627.68 381321 2841822 591.32 381329 2841823 2,134.96 381322 2641824 3,588.72 381324 2841826 1,095.77 381323 2841827 3,581.92 381325 2841828 16,639.66 396972 9/3/2015 100953 PHYSIO -CONTROL INC. 700.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 381091 416025507 700.00 396973 9/3/2015 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC 2,375.50 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 381015 1400193173 2,375.50 396974 9/3/2015 118747 POTTERS INDUSTRIES LLC 4,704.00 GLASS BEADS FOR PAINTING 00001556 381262 90994598 4,704.00 396975 9/3/2015 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 43.06 UNIFORM PURCHASE 381263 082715 43.06 396976 9/3/2015 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 69.21 NITRILE GLOVES 00005579 380899 56780 69.21 396977 9/3/2015 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 286.00 OFFICIATING FEES 381356 082715 • 5822.5513 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 1470.6160 1647.6103 1335.6532 5913.6201 1553.6610 1621.6103 0 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 23 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ' 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PAINT LAUNDRY SAFETY EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAVEMENT MARKINGS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES CITY OF EDINA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396977 9/3/2015 124537 RALPH, ROBERT Continued... 286.00 396978 9/3/2015 134496 REFINED LLC 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 381100 5845 BROOKVIEW 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 396979 9/3/2015 125936 REINDERS INC. 1,169.00 FERTILIZER 00001565 361215 3033654-00 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,169.00 396980 9/3/2015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 365.08 SOFTENER SALT 00002250 381267 00320263 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS 365.08 396981 9/3/2015 134818 ROSTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 19,878.70 RETAINING WALL 381180 3 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 19,878.70 396982 9/3/2015 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 3,200.00 TREE STUMP GRINDING 381019 909271869 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 3,200.00 396983 9/3/2016 136093 SAPSUCKER FARMS LLC 63.60 360948 554 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 63.60 396984 9/3/2015 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 74.81 HVAC FILTERS 00001545 381092 132792 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 74.81 396985 9/3/2015 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 839.61 QUARTERLY BILLING 381183 8104065451 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 839.61 396986 9/3/2015 102435 SCHMITZER, DAVID 62.08 FUEL FOR TF -1 TRAINING 381097 REIMBURSE 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 62.08 396987 9/3/2015 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING ICITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 396987 9/3/2015 106664 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 1,352.09 BEAM DETECTOR REPAIR 381268 81631120 5720.6180 1,352.09 396988 9/3/2015 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 39.15 PLIERS 00005537 381020 ARV/26493689 1553.6556 207.54 CUTTING TOOLS 00005631 381022 ARV/26506156 1553.6556 67.95 TORX SET 00005495 381021 ARV/26507379 1553.6556 314.64 396989 9/3/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 520.50 380950 1317663 5822.5513 1,001.00 380949 1317665 5822.5513 300.42 381071 1319938 5822.5512 2,033.75 381072 1319939 5822.5513 •75 381145 1319941 5842.5512 124.50 381143 1319942 5842.5515 1,007.53 381144 1319943 5842.5512 ' 289.50 381142 1319944 5842.5513 3,042.36 381146 1319945 5842.5513 124.50 381069 1319946 5862.5515 1,267.65 381068 1319947 5862.5512 676.50 381070 1319949 5862.5513 10,217.93 381330 1319950 5862.5513 20,606.89 396990 9/3/2015 136994 STAFFORD HOME SERVICE 90.40 REFUND ED141746 PERMIT 381103 5701 HAWKES DR 1495.4115 90.40 396991 9/3/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 247.75 380951 6186 5862.5514 336.00 381147 6239 5842.5514 583.75 396992 9/3/2015 136332 STONEWOOD LLC 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 381101 5809 NORTHWOOD 1495.4109 DR 2,500.00 396993 9/3/2015 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 0 0 Subledger Account Description Continued... CONTRACTED REPAIRS TOOLS TOOLS TOOLS 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 25 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS CITY OF EDIP • R55CKR2 LOGIS1• 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 -- 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 396993 9/3/2015 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. Continued... 77.00 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005564 381026 10133910 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 303.70 TIRES 00005605 380900 10134374 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 231.88 TIRES 00005611 381027 10134467 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 612.58 396994 9/3/2015 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA 729.88 CONCESSION PRODUCT 381270 508210523 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 168.33- RETURNED ITEMS 381271 CUST 107532 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 561.55 396995 9/3/2015 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 144.33 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 381374 083115 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 144.33 396996 9/3/2015 137005 TELLANDER, MATT 79.93 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 381357 083115 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 79.93 396997 9/3/2015 121253 THAYER, LARRY 169.63 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 381028 082115 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 169.63 396998 9/3/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 130.55 380952 913834 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 117.90 381185 914598 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,829.90 381331 915227 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,078.35 396999 9/3/2015 132615 TIMBERLAND HOMES AND REMODELING 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 381102 5717 BERNARD PL 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 c 397000 9/3/2015 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 397.00 8/5/15 COUNCIL MEETING 380901 M21527 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 397.00 397001 9/3/2015 137007 TINBERG, ANNE 7.27 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 381358 082815 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 100.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 381358 082815 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 107.27 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 — 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397001 9/3/2015 137007 TINBERG, ANNE Continued... 397002 9/3/2015 128347 TKO WINES INC. 271.20 381332 1953 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 271.20 397003 9/3/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 29.08 OXYGEN FOR TORCHES 00001523 380902 10094139 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 29.08 397004 9/3/2015 123649 TOWMASTER 57.51 PLUG, TERMINAL 00005606 380903 372176 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.51 397005 9/3/2015 136366 TRU NORTH PAINTING INC. 1,926.39 CAHILL SCHOOL PAINTING 381029 16190 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,926.39 397006 9/3/2015 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC 1,065.00 MANTOUX TESTS 361198 33599 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 445.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 381197 T38112115 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 1,510.00 397007 9/3/2015 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 85.00 ADJUST STRIKE ON DOOR 381186 736452 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 85.00 397008 9/3/2015 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. 1,511.64 SOFTBALLS 381359 150-0016432-01 1621.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 755.82 SOFTBALLS 391360 150-0016434-01 1621.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 2,267.46 397009 9/3/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 129.40 CAN LINERS 00001503 381030 358039-01 1645.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 138.30 CAN LINERS 381187 358554-01 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 267.70 397010 9/3/2015 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.01 381368 9749893263 1160.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FINANCE 35.01 381368 9749893263 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 35.01 381368 9749893263 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL • • i 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 397010 9/3/2015 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 70.02 381368 9749893263 1646.6188 210.06 381368 9749893263 1260.6188 309.52 381368 9749893263 1554.6188 350.10 381368 9749893263 1495.6188 770.22 381368 9749893263 1470.6188 890.08 381368 9749893263 1400.6160 35.01 381368 9749893263 44012.6710 35.01 381368 9749893263 5760.6188 350.10 381368 9749893263 5910.6188 53.02 381367 9749945480 1470.6188 814.13 381367 9749945480 1400.6406 3,992.30 397011 9/3/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 493.41 TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 00001542 381219 9601635 1321.6530 95.77 381217 9610220 1321.6530 180.02 WIRE 00001560 381221 9612628 1321.6530 38.92 CONDUIT 00001563 381222 9612678 1642.6180 258.09 LOCK OUT KIT 00001542 381220 9613956 1322.6406 95.77- 381218 CM577625 1321.6530 970.44 397012 9/3/2016 136998 VYE, KATHERINE 40.26 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381110 4208 FRANCEAVE 5900.2015 40.26 397013 9/312015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 222.32 381336 7044343 5822.5513 1,834.20 381335 7044345 5842.5513 4,184.60 381337 7044346 5862.5513 6,241.12 397014 913/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,897.87 380954 1080362192 5822.5513 1,839.41 381129 1080364883 5862.5513 1,500.24 381073 1080364934 5862.5512 109.15 381074 1080364936 5862.5512 1,447.98 381075 1080364938 5822.5513 727.16 381076 1060364940 5822.5512 73.15 381077 1080364942 5842.5515 Subledger Account Description Continued... TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CUSTOMER REFUND COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 28 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL P23 50TH&FR PARKI NG&WAYFIN DING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE GENERAL (BILLING) FIRE DEPT, GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR FIELD MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 29 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397014 9/3/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 2,577.18 381078 1080364943 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,622.57 381149 1080364955 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 18.00- 381155 2080096539 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 46.29- 381154 2080096540 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 216.61- 381151 2080096557 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,157.54- 381150 2080096564 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 39.00- 381152 2080100420 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12.00- 381153 20BO100428 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 11,305.27 397016 9/3/2016 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 2,990.40 380963 1090455918 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 221.40 380962 1090455919 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,876.85 380955 1090455920 5822.5614 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 123.00 380956 1090455961 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 46.20 380957 1090455962 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,097.30 380958 1090455963 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 155.60 381188 1090455964 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 84.00 380960 1090456281 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,720.80 380961 1090456262 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 186.60 380959 1090456283 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,952.40 361080 1090457092 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 69.30 381079 1090457093 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,904.90 381338 1690459607 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,014.00 381339 1090459608 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17,442.75 397016 9/3/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 14.69 51-0010619811-5 380917 468823895 1321.6165 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.79 51-0160483-1 380912 468837182 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 26.40 51-0223133-2 380913 468837370 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 419.68 51-4621797-2 380918 468896887 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 50.56 51-4420190-3 380914 468899311 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 14.42 51-6541084-2 380904 468931036 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 83.65 51-9770164-7 380916 468969286 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 181.44 51-0010166207-2 380906 468975444 1646.6165 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.17 51-0010118404-0 380905 468979361 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 20.85 51-0010573502-3 380909 468984845 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 22.95 51-9770163-6 380915 468985497 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.42 51-0010777228-2 380911 468994276 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTINOAMENTAL 0 R55CKR2 LOGISI CITY OF EDIP Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/3/2015 — 9/3/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 397016 9/3/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY 19.24 51-0010573385-0 380908 468997205 1321.6185 17.33 51-0010573384-9 380907 469002735 1321.6185 43.47 51-0010619455-3 380910 469002879 1321.6185 12,455.67 51-6644819-9 381361 469107910 5720.6185 37.43 51-8976004-9 381362 469138900 1321.6185 10,841.58 51-6955679-8 381363 469292072 1551.61B5 12,161.17 51-0837548-4 381364 469369151 5915.61B5 36;463.91 397017 9/3/2015 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 223.50 223.50 3,539,016.39 Grand Total 381340 16067 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER • 9/1/2015 10:15:36 Page - 30 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CITY HALL GENERAL WATER TREATMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,200,435.68 A/PACH Payment 2,338,580.71 Total Payments 3,539,016.39 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary 9/3/2015 - 9/3/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 169,495.35 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,300.00 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 183,250.43 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 975,594.67 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 25,100.36 04500 CANDO FUND 33,294.08 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,448.30 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 87.51 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 391.99 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 253,721.77 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 499.61 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 19,966.21 . 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 15,442.91 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 637.93 05800 LIQUOR FUND 177,358.49 05900 UTILITY FUND 638,366.56 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 901,350.41 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,546.54 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 138,163.27 Report Totals 3,539,016.39 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date � L f s 9/1/2015 10:15:53 Page- 1 0 • • �a y;� p Furl • • �a R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- age-Council Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1939 9/10/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 42.00 381377 1926180 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 32.00 381517 1926932 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 70.40 381376 1926941 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 65.60 381375 1926946 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 86.40 381682 1928210 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 87.20 381683 1928213 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 383.60 1940 9/10/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 639.32 COFFEE 381756 1193136 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 639.32 1941 9/10/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 472.65 381545 498291DO 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 496.20 381546 49629300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 430.20 381691 49829400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 133.05 381693 49940900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4 227.10 381695 49941200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 145.55 381692 49941300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 106.48 381379 92487300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7.24 381380 92565900 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 110.14 381694 92644700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,130.61 1942 9/10/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 30.50 SIGNATURE STAMP 381390 IN-34933 1400.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 381391 OE-404199-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 18.35 MONTHLY PLANNER 381392 OE-404200-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 95.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 381484 WO-140800-1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 20.78 MEMO BOOKS 00003198 381595 WO-141229-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 213.22 1943 9/10/2015 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 298.00 TRUNK SEWER REHAB 381759 0181224 03465.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TRUNK SS LINING 13,581.50 PICKLEBALL COURT PROJECT 381485 0181225 47095.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ROSLAND PK- PICKLEBALL COURTS 13, 879.50 1944 9/10/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 39.38 CONNECTOR 00005608 381393 987515 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 541.34 SHOES, DRUMS 00005663 381596 987919 1653.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPER# GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1944 9/1012015 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Continued... 45.98 FRONT WHEEL 00005663 381599 987919X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 713.08 DRUM/CAST, GASKETS 00005663 381600 987919X2 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.47 MOTOR 00005663 381598 988376 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 271.51 SWITCH 00005616 381597 988620 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 76.16 OIL BATH 00005663 381601 989805 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,716.92 1945 9/10/2015 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 6,164.75 MATERIALS TESTING 381763 8036062 01413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON 4,836.50 MATERIALS TESTING 381761 B036179 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING, INSPECTION BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD 3,399.50 MATERIALS TESTING 381762 B036753 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 600.00 MATERIALS TESTING 381760 8036930 01404.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCEAVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 5,451.50 MATERIALS TESTING 381764 B36210 10096.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR6 54TH STREET BRIDGE 20,452.25 1946 9/10/2015 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 140.00 CHEMICAL CLEANER 381765 518444 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 140.00 1947 9/10/2015 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 55.00 SCBA MAINTENANCE 381844 162530 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 55.00 1948 9/10/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 225.00 381698 207581 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 225.00 1949 9/10/2015 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 475.00 RAMP CLEANING 381488 7070216537 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 3,218.25 CLEANING SERVICES 381768 7070217344 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 3,693.25 1950 9/10/2015 104020 DALCO 132.66 TOWELS 381490 2926202 1552.64D6 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 132.66 1951 9/10/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 955.15 381522 818469 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19.20 381523 818470 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,078.55 381526 818471 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1951 9/10/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Continued... 3,972.37 381525 818473 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 49.20 381524 818474 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 10, 074.47 1952 9/10/2015 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 576.00 CARAMEL CORN 381772 2054 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 576.00 1953 9/10/2015 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 4,200.00 MANHOLE LIDS 00005286 381775 UU6337 5932.6536 CASTINGS 4,200.00 1954 9/10/2015 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,466.00 AUG 2015 BILLING 381776 2289 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,466.00 1955 9/10/2015 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 381778 2467121 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 425.00 1956 9/10/2015 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 123.63 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 381615 090315 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 123.63 1957 9/10/2015 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 1,383.40 FIELD PAINT 00001658 381621 108322 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 1,383.40 1958 9/10/2015 129508 IMPACT 491.48 MAILAUG LATE NOTICES 381500 105586 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 491.48 1959 9/10/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 187.18 TUBE, FITTINGS 00001646 381624 940977 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 246.08 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001646 381623 940978 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 433.26 1960 9/10/2015 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 185.50 SWAT -EAGLE EMBLEMS 361415 32002 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 185.50 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page- 3 Business Unit YUI'M otLLINU YORK SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS GENERAL STORM SEWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ENVIRONMENT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 0 is 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 4 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM Morningside Water Main Lining YORK SELLING YORK SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL S133 Valley View Rd BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD Valley View Rd Valley View Rd Valley View Rd 5114 GRIMES AVE SIDEWALK MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON DISTRIBUTION • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1960 9/10/2015 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. Continued... 1961 9/10/2015 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. 250.00 FIRE PUMP TEST 381625 110277 5210.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 250.00 1962 9/10/2015 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES 590.50 PLUMBING REPAIR 381795 2423 05556.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 590.50 1963 9/10/2015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,592.25 381384 202094 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7.40 381729 202309 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,599.65 1964 9/10/2015 101483 MENARDS 5.34 POT TRAYS 00006407 381638 93804 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 2.99 HALOGEN 12V 00001650 381418 94278 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 8.33 1965 9/10/2015 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 563.63 STATION SUPPLIES 00003660 381860 36715 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 563.63 1966 9/10/2015 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 62,624.48 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 361867 120-151-016 07133.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 229,682.72 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381867 120-151-016 01377.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2,679.11 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381867 120-151-016 03491.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 12,835.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381867 120-151-016 05557.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 25,208.62 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381867 120-151-016 04415.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 16,204.51 FINAL PAYMENT 381866 BA -406 07114.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 39,614.44- FINAL PAYMENT 381866 BA -406 01406.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5,217.94 FINAL PAYMENT 381866 BA -406 03479.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 87,550.93 FINAL PAYMENT 361866 BA -406 05537.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 10,183.38 FINAL PAYMENT 381866 BA -406 04395.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 412,572.25 1967 9/10/2015 119486 PARAGON BLACK DIRT 2,493.00 STREET SWEEPINGS DISPOSAL 381651 6127 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 2,493.00 is 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 4 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM Morningside Water Main Lining YORK SELLING YORK SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL S133 Valley View Rd BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD Valley View Rd Valley View Rd Valley View Rd 5114 GRIMES AVE SIDEWALK MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1968 9/10/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Continued... 249.04 LINERS 381805 8314 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 876.14 LINERS, TISSUE, WIPERS, GLOVES 00002064 381806 8317 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,125.18 1969 9/10/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 98.50 BUSINESS CARDS 381810 87585 1550,6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 98.50 BUSINESS CARDS 381809 87624 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 197.00 1970 9/1012016 129460 SAWYER, KYLE 59.98 IDENTITY MONITORING 381673 090415 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE 59.98 1971 9/10/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 48.65 WATER HEATER PARTS 00001555 381424 53129345.001 5821.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 48.65 1972 9/10/2015 101016 STRETCHERS 1,072.50 BALL. VEST, TRAUMA PLATE 381425 11168068 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,072.50 1973 9/10/2015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 62.25 HANDLE 00005613 381426 100519 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.23 CAP 00005615 361427 100619 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.29 LOCK 00005617 381428 100738 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 266.77 1974 9/1012016 119454 VINOCOPIA 130.25 381575 0131715 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 114.75 381386 0131717 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 249.50 381574 0131719 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 277.00 381747 0132125 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 132.00 381748 0132130 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 903.50 1975 9/10/2015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 503.57 CONCESSION PRODUCT 381827 43339586 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 503.57 1976 9/10/2015101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 0 0 0 • 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1976 9110/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 573.90 381578 402826-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 984.25 381577 403005-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,692.75 381579 403007-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,250.90 397018 9/10/2015 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 176.60 MERCHANDISE 381631 901276463 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 72.00- CREDIT 381832 901282659 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 104.60 397019 9/10/2015 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 75.56 CO2 381755 32361618 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 75.56 397020 9/10/2015 102840 AMERICAN EXPRESS 149.19 EXPENSES/MEMBER FEE 381671 0-71009 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 149.19 397021 9/1012015 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 316.42 381448 D83115 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 348.78 381448 D83115 1470,6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 512.88 381448 083115 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 97.67 381448 083115 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 221.38 381448 083115 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 282.42 381448 083115 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 1,779.55 397022 9/10/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 256.00 381685 3052333 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 853.95 381688 3052334 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 256.00 381687 3052335 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,365.10 381684 3052336 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,929.30 381686 3052337 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,660.35 397023 9/10/2016 137017 ARTISTRY 876.00 PLAYGROUND FIELD TRIPS 381483 490 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 876.00 397024 9/10/2015 100212 AT&T R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397024 9/10/2015 100212 AT&T Continued... 40.05 053 418 7324 001 381447 082415 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.05 397025 9/1012015 120995 AVR INC. 663.25 SIDEWALK 381388 116234 1365.6520 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE 663.25 397026 9/1012015 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 100.00 OPEN STREETS ON 50TH EVENT 381593 090115 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 100.00 397027 9/10/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 241.00 361378 3222 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 359.00 381518 3254 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 257.00 381690 3291 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 300.00 381689 3292 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,157.00 397028 9/10/2015 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 917.65 LAWN MAINTENANCE 381594 145342 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 917.65 397029 9/10/2015 137013 BERGQUIST, ELIZABETH 7.27 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 381471 083115 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 100.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 381471 083115 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 107.27 397030 9/10/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 360.00 PIZZA 381757 D2813642 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 360.00 397031 9/10/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 128.70 381758 242197 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 740.12 381547 243728 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 868.82 397032 9/10/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 140.15 COFFEE 381389 T80828 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 140.15 0 0 0 • . • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397033 9/10/2015 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE Continued... 42.01 CANDY / CHIPS 381833 090215 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 42.01 397034 9/10/2015 137030 BOARD, SCOTT 97.50 CROSSTOWN CAMERA CLUB EXHIBIT 381834 090415 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 97.50 397035 9/10/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 296.50 361696 128697 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 651.00 381697 128698 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 947.50 397036 9/10/2015 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 669.58 GOLF BALLS 381835 1002413306 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 669.58 397037 9/10/2016 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 100.00 OPEN STREETS ON 50TH EVENT 381602 090115 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 100.00 397038 910/2016 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 677.16- CREDIT 381840 926216702 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 902.88- CREDIT 381842 926224571 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP. PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 386.10- CREDIT 381841 926227259 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,338.92 GOLF CLUBS 381836 926254892 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 873.84 GOLF CLUBS 381837 926265930 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 325.60 DRIVER 381838 926269897 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 277.20- CREDIT 381843 926284366 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 325.60 DRIVER 361839 926285038 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 620.62 ' 397039 9/10/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 18.55 381520 00011009 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 519.60 381519 676731 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,577.85 381521 677566 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,116.00 397040 9/10/2015 101616 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 650.00 CONCRETE BLOCKS 381603 C1647379 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 650.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397040 9/10/2015 101516 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. Continued... 397041 9/10/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 126.13 952 831-0024 381394 0024-6/15 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 56.61 952 929-0297 381604 0297-8/15 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 442.89 952 927-8861 381395 8861-8/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 41.47 952 922-9246 381450 9246-8/15 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 134.10 952 920-9996 E911 381449 9996-8/15 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 801.20 397042 9/10/2016 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 1,493.11 LAB SERVICES 361486 090115 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER WATER TREATMENT 1,493.11 397043 9/10/2015 118580 CITY OF EDINA 400.00 BIKE RACK INSTALL 381670 090415 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 400.00 397044 9/10/2015 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 405.04 381385 0148343023 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 189.24 381548 0148343219 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 594.28 397045 9/10/2015 120433 COMCAST 9.01 8772 10 614 0161120 361766 161120-8/15 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 9.01 397046 9/10/2015 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 63.47 MATERIALS TESTING 381767 P00004799 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD 98.31 MATERIALS TESTING 381767 P00004799 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 161.78 397047 9/10/2015 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 102.60 MOTOR REPAIR 00001653 381487 100693 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 102.60 397048 9/10/2015 101704 COOK, BARBARA 210.42 AEROBICS SESSIONS 381472 15-1706 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 587.12 THEATER CAMP 381472 15-1706 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 797.54 0 0 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 — 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397049 9/10/2015 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD Continued... 72.00 MODEL 381845 090415 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 72.00 397050 9/10/2015 102596 CROWN TROPHY 27.95 PLATE ENGRAVING 381489 10550 2610.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 27.95 397051 9/10/2016 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC. 240.93 COMPRESSOR 00005665 381396 4-204336 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 240.93 397052 9/10/2015 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 27.10- CREDIT 381606 24667 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.44 GLOVES 00005645 381605 32230 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.34 397053 9/10/2015 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 99.00 651972955 381672 651972955-8/15 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 99.00 397054 9/10/2015 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 5,849.87 REFUSE 381769 DT0001203600 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,177.97 REFUSE 381770 DT0001228836 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 8,027.84 397055 9/10/2015 130096 DIGITAL LIGHTING SYSTEMS INC. 172.00 LIGHTING 381607 22194 7412.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF RANGE 172.00 397056 9/10/2015 118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC. 157.20 PLATES, ROUNDS 00005636 381397 4007622 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.20 397057 9/10/2015 102783 DLT SOLUTIONS INC. 7,324.59 AUTOCAD CIVIL31D SOFTWARE 381771 S1295837 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 7,324.59 397058 9/10/2015 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC 364.00 381549 10063 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 364.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397058 9/10/2015 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC Continued... 397059 9/1012015 137016 EAGAN UPROAR 610.00 AQUATIC CENTER REFUND 361473 7/31/15 EVENT 5301.4541 GENERALADMISSIONS 810.00 397060 9/10/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 2,450.55 EDITION EDINA 381608 252531 1130.6575 PRINTING 2,450.55 397061 9/10/2015 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 7.08 SCREWS 00001573 381773 12254100 5553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 42.48 BATTERIES, OXIDE INHIBITORS 00001644 381399 12268000 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 34.13 CONTROLS 00001652 381398 12279100 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 83.69 397062 9/10/2015 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,162.50 BUSSES FOR SUMMER TRIPS 381446 15-056 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,162.50 397063 9/10/2015 103594 EDINALARM INC. 142.48 ALARM REPAIR 381609 99130 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE 142.48 397064 9/10/2015 118010 EGAN, BILL 135.00 PEST REMOVAL 381610 BRAEMAR GOLF 5420.61 BO CONTRACTED REPAIRS 135.00 397065 9/10/2015 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 3,533.68 E-82 REPAIRS 381846 82150 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,789.52 T-90 REPAIRS 381847 82151 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5,323.20 397066 9/10/2015 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 747.48 DWI VEHICLE BUILDUP 361400 TB0072G 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 747.48 397067 9/10/2015 134601 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES INC. 568.00 REVIEW ROAD PROJECTS 381774 01169-0003-2 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 568.00 0 • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 11 Business Unit AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE PLAYGROUND &THEATER VERNON OCCUPANCY CLUB HOUSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE EQUIPMENT ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 12 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS STREET RENOVATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE MILLPOND LKVEGETATION CONTROL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GRILL GRILL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397068 9/10/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 23.44 V -BELT 381494 1-4775969 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 114.96 TRANSMISSION FLUID 381402 69-191397 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 26.28 OIL 381401 69-191421 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 97.47 WIRE & CABLE, SPARK PLUGS 381493 69-191520 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 46.86 ROTOR ASSEMBLY, SCREEN 381491 69-191691 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 19.54 V -BELT 381492 69-191728 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 328.55 397069 9110/2015 122549 FARNER-BOCKEN COMPANY 543.52 CONCESSION PRODUCT 381403 4203199 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 515.35 CONCESSION PRODUCT 381777 4227671 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,058.87 397070 9/10/2015 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 234.95 PARTS 381495 MNTC2132346 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 234.95 397071 9/10/2015 100756 FEDEX 28.22 SHIPPING CHARGE 381404 5-136-96068 1400.6235 POSTAGE 28.22 397072 9/10/2015 131188 FIRST -SHRED 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 381405 157155 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.80 397073 9/10/2015 133685 FISCHER MINING LLC 400.00 BLOCKS 381496 104079 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 400.00 397074 9/10/2015 124520 FRESHWATER HARVESTING INC. 7,500,00 MILL POND HARVESTING 381779 201579 5938.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,500.00 397075 9/10/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 ACCT 0012939 381611 1006273175 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 44.03 ACCT 0039263 381780 1013271712 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 43.92 ACCT 0039263 381781 1013283133 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 19.94 3B1451 1108799-8/15 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 58.60 381451 1108799-8/15 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 147.50 381451 1108799-B/15 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 12 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS STREET RENOVATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE MILLPOND LKVEGETATION CONTROL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GRILL GRILL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 1.035.89 POOL OPERATION Council Check Register by GL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 397076 9/10/2015 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 103029 GALETON Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397075 9/10/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES SAFETY EQUIPMENT Continued... 224.71 381451 1108799-8/15 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 314.89 381451 1108799-8/15 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 27.55 381451 1108799-8/15 5511.6201 LAUNDRY 139.75 381451 1108799-8/15 5913.6201 LAUNDRY GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 13 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER PLAYGROUND & THEATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES . MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1.035.89 POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 397076 9/10/2015 REPAIR PARTS 103029 GALETON SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 2,194.97 GLOVES 00003654 381848 1279396-00 1470.6406 2,194.97 397077 9/10/2015 101178 GOPHER 471.64 DODGEBALLS 381452 8969729 1624.6406 260.23 DODGEBALLS 381453 8971221 1624.6406 731.87 397078 9/10/2015 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,821.15 AUG 2015 SERVICE 00001622 381612 146228 5913.6103 1,821.15 397079 9/10/2015 101103 GRAINGER 130.94 TRIMMER LINE 00006452 381613 9816624119 5422.6406 144.71 SOLENOID VALVE 00002150 381782 9817417695 5311.6406 491.95 SQUAD POWER OUTLET BOXES 00001561 381411 9820063544 1400.6215 6.32 KEY TAGS 00005637 381408 9823608717 1553.6406 690.75 CORD REEL 00005637 381409 9823608725 1553.6585 10.60 BUNGEE STRAPS 00005638 381407 9823788089 1553.6530 6.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005882 381410 9824932504 5913.6610 61.16 EAR PLUGS 00005583 381406 9827837395 1301.6610 175.00 EAR PLUGS 00005583 381406 9827837395 5913.6610 452.70 PANELVIEW 00001657 381497 9828489469 5913.6406 69.86 WALL BRACKET FIXTURE 381614 9628878950 7411.6406 2,239.99 397080 9/10/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 181.00 381699 186386 5822.5513 181.00 397081 9/1012015 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 643.38 SIGNAL WIRE 00001456 381784 980243408 2501.6103 925.73 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABLE 00001495 381783 980294774 2501.6103 0 0 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 13 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER PLAYGROUND & THEATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES . MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 — 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397081 9/10/2015 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. Continued... 1,569.11 397082 9/10/2015 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 466.32 SEAT SUSPENSION, NUTS, BOLTS 381498 147098 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 466.32 397083 9110/2015 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 219.63 OCE CARTRIDGE 381785 318090 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 22.98- CREDIT ON ACCT CIT377 381786 C312469 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 196.65 397084 9/10/2015 100788 H&L MESABI 1,238.13 PLOW BLADES 00005521 381412 93897 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,238.13 397085 9/10/2015 137025 HANRAHAN, KELLY 35.00 SAFETY CAMP REFUND 361676 090215 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP PARKADMIN. GENERAL 35.00 397086 9/10/2015 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 698.62 SURVEY STAKES 00002578 381787 10125 01420.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 698.62 SURVEY STAKES OOOD2578 381787 10125 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 1,397.24 397087 9/10/2015 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 1,376.84 END OF SEASON BBQ EXPENSES 381454 083115 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 1,376.84 397088 9/10/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 488.86 CHLORINE, SODIUM HYDRO 381788 3767632 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 2,698.61 CHEMICALS 00005285 381499 3771221 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,187.47 397089 9/10/2015 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 512.56 COUPLERS 381620 E348607 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 512.56 397090 9/10/2015 137026 HEINRICH, RICHARD 468.48 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381675 5502 LAKEVIEW 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 397090 9/10/2016 137026 HEINRICH, RICHARD 468.48 397091 9/10/2016 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 381616 40954 1470.6103 2,475.08 397092 9/10/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 933.00 JULY 2015 ROOM & BOARD 381413 1000064145 1195.6225 933.00 397093 9/10/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 145.38 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 174.90 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 409.48 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 765.90 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 777.47 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 895.07 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 2,206.10 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 2,442.08 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 3,365.56 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 3,447.88 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 3,802.16 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 1503.6915 14,804.05 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 5510.6103 2,687.69 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 5820.6103 12,136.82 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 9232.6710 745.95 381455 TAXES -2ND HALF 9235.6710 48,806.49 397094 9/10/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 835.84 AUG 2015 BOOKINGS 381617 1000064519 1195.6170 835.84 397095 9/10/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 165.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 3B1619 1000064461 1190.6105 165.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 381618 1000064462 1400.6160 330.00 397096 9/10/2015 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 152.00 MONITOR 00004367 381414 56307795 1400.6215 258.00 MONITOR 00004367 381414 56307795 1600.6406 Subledger Account Description Continued... 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 15 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COURT CHARGES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERALSUPPLIES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ARENAADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET GENERAL CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST LEGAL SERVICES ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARKADMIN. GENERAL 0 • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 16 Business Unit FRANCE AVE LANDSCAPE PLAN 1,162.00 381550 781213 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 0 58.00 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 781214 5822.5515 CITY OF EDINA 1,683.50 Council Check Register by GL 781573 5842.5514 2,903.50 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397096 9/10/2015 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY Continued... 381622 090115 410.00 100.00 397097 9/10/2015 128215 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA 397100 9/10/2015 6,776.71 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 381849 A-259 01259.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 6,776.71 26.62 397098 9/10/2015 EXPENSES 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 090115 1400.6104 • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 16 Business Unit FRANCE AVE LANDSCAPE PLAN 1,162.00 381550 781213 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CLASS REGISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.00 381527 781214 5822.5515 1,683.50 381551 781573 5842.5514 2,903.50 397099 9/10/2015 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND CONCERT BAND 100.00 OPEN STREETS ON 50TH EVENT 381622 090115 1627.6103 100.00 397100 9/10/2015 115074 HUNTER, TIM 26.62 TRAINING EXPENSES 381456 090115 1400.6104 33.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 381456 090115 1400.6107 59.62 397101 9/10/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 601.00 381381 32117 5862.5514 320.00 381701 32222 5822.5514 860.00 381700 32338 5842.5514 1,781.00 397102 9/10/2015 137020 JENNINGS, THERESE 169.00 ART CLASS REFUND 381501 14632 5101.4607 169.00 397103 9/10/2015 134816 JENSEN, CLAIRE 540.00 PROF. SERVICES 381850 090315 5110,6103 540.00 397104 9/10/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 9.43 381789 8/15 -ENG 1261.6406 24.77 381789 8/15 -ENG 1262.6406 3.59 381627 8/15-EQUIPT 1553.6406 6.23 381627 8/15-EQUIPT 1553.6556 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CLASS REGISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397104 9/10/2015 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE Continued... 214.76 361627 8/15-EQUIPT 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.00 381502 8/15 -FACILITIES 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.14 381502 8/15 -FACILITIES 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 20.38 381851 8/15 -FIRE 1495.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 326.75 381851 8/15 -FIRE 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9.59 381628 8/15 -LIQUOR 5861.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 3.67 381457 8/15-PARK® 1626.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 12.31 381457 8/15-PARK&REC 1624.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 746.30 381503 8/15 -PARKS 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.19 381503 8/15 -PARKS 5311.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 17.14 381416 8/15 -POLICE 1400.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 775.74 381626 8/15 -STREETS 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 60.87 361626 8/15 -STREETS 4090.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,383.66 397105 9/10/2015 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 83.00 UMPIRE CARDS 381504 68818 1621.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 83.00 397106 9/10/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST, OF MINN 338.00 381553 2396964 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,389.68 381703 2396967 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,743.05 381552 2396968 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,617.90 381702 2396975 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 493.20 381790 2412533 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 23,581.83 397107 9/10/2015 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 36.74 VALVE BOXES 00006405 381629 72977132 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 89.78 MARKING PAINT 00006300 381630 73024183 5422.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 93.20 CONNECTORS 00006456 381631 73038791 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 221.72 397103 9/10/2015 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA INC. 191.75 PUMP REPAIR 00001664 381632 10201012-00 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 191.75 397109 9/10/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,995.82 381382 5243977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,433.64 381557 5243986 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 0 0 0 0 • 9 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397109 9/10/2015 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,195.35 381556 5243990 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 120.00 381555 5244325 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 364.64 381554 5245551 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 407.50 381727 5249366 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 109.82 381721 5249369 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,427.91 381704 5249370 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4.64 381705 5249372 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 389.81 381706 5249373 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 381712 5249375 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 506.18 381707 5249376 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 381709 5249378 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 90.41 381720 5249379 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.16 361718 5249380 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,494.52 381717 5249382 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 181.16 381728 5249383 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.23 381726 5249384 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 221.51 381725 5249385 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,724.21 381724 5249386 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,794.36 381723 5249387 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,089.49 381716 5249388 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,013.32 381719 5249389 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,521.85 381715 5249390 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 719.24 381722 5249391 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,058.28 381710 5249397 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,731.84 381711 5249399 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 284.88 381713 5249401 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,747.97 381708 5249402 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 180.80 381714 5249617 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.00- 381528 538286 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4.13- 381383 539391 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 40,902.73 397110 9/10/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 249.95 UNIFORMS 00003642 381852 283660-02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 327.96 00003646 381853 284954-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 577.91 397111 9/10/2015 136686 KIDCREATE STUDIO 1,272.00 DINOMANIACLASS 381458 5664 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 1,272.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397111 9/10/2015 136686 KIDCREATE STUDIO Continued... 397112 9/10/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 6,565.00 50TH & FRANCE CONSTRUCTION 381633 6952612 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6,565.00 397113 9/10/2015 136161 KNOX COMPANY, THE 614.00 POWER PACKS 00003661 381854 INV00748236 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 614.00 397114 9/10/2015 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 3,270.00 LATE SEASON TREATMENT 00002649 381791 135670 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,086.00 MID SEASON TREATMENT 381792 135759 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,442.00 MID SEASON TREATMENT 381793 135760 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,560.00 LATE SEASON TREATMENT 381794 136038 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,358.00 397115 9/10/2015 136231 LARSON, DEB 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTING 381634 083115 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTING 381634 083115 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTING 381634 083115 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,100.00 397116 9/10/2016 102965 LEONE, RON 331.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 381635 090115 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 331.00 397117 9/10/2015 137028 LOSS PROTECTION ASSOCIATES 500.00 PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEYS 381855 1219309 01414.1705,21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,000.00 PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEYS 381855 1219309 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,500.00 PRECONSTRUCTION SURVEYS 381855 1219309 01413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,000.00 397118 9/10/2016 136846 LUCAS, CLAUDETTE 41.16 FOOD 381856 D90415 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 41.16 397119 9/10/2016 101361 M.I.A.M.A. 675.00 2015 FALL CONFERENCE-PURVES 00008053 381798 3114 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 675.00 • • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 19 Business Unit P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PONDS & LAKES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR PONDS & LAKES 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN HOLLANDS NHOOD RECON GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON GRILL ARENA ADMINISTRATION 0 BROECKEL 80.00 397126 9/10/2015 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 385,231.33 OCT 2015 SEWER 381639 0001048282 385,231.33 397127 9/10/2015 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 135.00 VEHICLE REPAIR 381506 269573 24.75 HANDLE 00005590 381640 494723 148.96 ARMASSEMBLIES 00005670 381642 495079 68.45 BUSHING 00005672 381641 495088 53.55 SUPPORT 00005619 381505 495090 84.47 WEATHER TRIM 00005674 381643 495141 515.18 397128 9/10/2015 137014 MILL CITY MUSEUM • 9/9/2D15 8:58:09 Page- 20 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET CLEANING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 1553.6180 • EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS • 1553.6530 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 — 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397120 9/10/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. Continued... 71.75 ANGLE 00005668 381417 2154742 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4,416.36 BROOMS, FAN 381636 2154843 1310.6523 BROOMS 4,488.11 397121 9/10/2015 129322 MANAGED DESIGN LLC 437.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 381796 18955 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 437.50 397122 9/10/2015 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 3,785.22 UNLEADED FUEL 00005644 381637 760326 1553.6581 GASOLINE 3,785.22 397123 9/10/2015 137027 MARTINSON CONSTRUCTION 1,800.00 DRIVEWAY REPAIR 381857 5107ARDENAVE 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,800.00 397124 9/1012015 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 70.54 OXYGEN 00003649 381859 11939963 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 25.00 OXYGEN 00003649 381858 11945451 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 95.54 397125 9/10/2015 137024 MERCIL, COLLEEN M 80.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 381677 BERNELL 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES BROECKEL 80.00 397126 9/10/2015 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 385,231.33 OCT 2015 SEWER 381639 0001048282 385,231.33 397127 9/10/2015 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 135.00 VEHICLE REPAIR 381506 269573 24.75 HANDLE 00005590 381640 494723 148.96 ARMASSEMBLIES 00005670 381642 495079 68.45 BUSHING 00005672 381641 495088 53.55 SUPPORT 00005619 381505 495090 84.47 WEATHER TRIM 00005674 381643 495141 515.18 397128 9/10/2015 137014 MILL CITY MUSEUM • 9/9/2D15 8:58:09 Page- 20 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET CLEANING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397128 9/10/2015 137014 MILL CITY MUSEUM Continued... 90.00 TRAVELIN' TEENS FIELD TRIP 381474 76449 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 90.00 397129 9/10/2015 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 100.00 HAND SOAP 381507 SOI -039535 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.00 397130 9/10/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 4,250.00 SEWER UPGRADE 00002516 381797 35034 03488.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,567.50 SL REPLACEMENT 00001619 361419 35035 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5,817.50 397131 9/10/2015 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 33,190.50 AUG 2015 WATER USAGE 381644 431-0005-9/15 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 33,190.50 397132 9/10/2015 101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS 28.00 ENGRAVED PLATES 381459 17192 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.00 397133 9/1012015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 263.66 EDINA LIQUOR FLYERS 381460 18427 5862.6575 PRINTING 263.67 EDINA LIQUOR FLYERS 381460 18427 5822.6575 PRINTING 263.67 EDINA LIQUOR FLYERS 381460 18427 5842.6575 PRINTING 791.00 397134 9/10/2015 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 391.88 MN GOLFER AD 00006460 381799 2015-41332 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 391.88 397135 9/10/2015 124571 MURPHY, WENDY 94.00 FOOD LICENSE RENEWAL 381861 CONCESSION 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 94.00 397136 9/10/2015 130453 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 381645 INV -065373 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 381645 INV -065373 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 381645 INV -065373 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,152.66 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 21 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE Countryside H Reconstruction DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION ARENA CONCESSIONS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397137 9/10/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC. Continued... 503.65 SHIRTS 381862 974511511 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 105.93 SHIRTS 381863 974783472 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 96.35 SHRITS 381864 974999414 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 106.63 MERCHANDISE 381865 975686313 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 812.56 397138 9/10/2015 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 143.62 12V 10W FESTOON BASES 381421 90754 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17.70 500W QUARTZ CLEAR 130V 00001576 381420 90755 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 161.32 397139 9/10/2015 132509 NOLAN, MARK 89.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 381508 090115 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION 89.88 397140 9/10/2015 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 2,337.40 MOUNT KIT, LIGHTS 00005487 381647 39374 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 801.49 LIGHT BAR 00005610 381646 39491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.20 FLASHERS 00005614 381422 39518 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,249.09 397141 9/10/2015 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 150.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 381800 789424515001 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 150.14 397142 9/10/2015 134456 OMLIE, JAMES JOSEPH 135.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 381509 082815 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA 135.00 _397143 9/10/2015 137029 ONE SOUTHDALE PLACE 4,572.00 RAMP RECONSTRUCTION 381868 ADA RAMPS 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 4,572.00 397144 9/10/2D15 101659 ORKIN 150.00 REMOVE BEES FROM WELLHOUSE 381649 104179093 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 144.35 PEST CONTROL 381650 104377191 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 130.00 PEST CONTROL 381648 104380310 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 424.35 397145 9/10/2015 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 4.06 381564 2841820 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 9/9/2015 8:58:09 1,704.00 381563 2841825 Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Page- 23 1,704.00 381531 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.16 381529 2843545 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 50TH ST SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397145 9/10/2015 2843547 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Continued... 381565 2843548 157.94 HOSE FOR PAINTER 00001663 381510 34023 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 5862.6512 157.94 VERNON SELLING 16.24 381533 2843550 5862.5513 397146 9/10/2015 VERNON SELLING 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 4,458.00 381566 2843551 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.81- 4,458.00 381730 8513095 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,314.03 381734 381561 8513567 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 297.80 496.06 2845451 361560 8513571 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 381736 400.75 5842.5512 381559 8513575 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2845453 1,430.03 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 381558 8513578 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,604.06 • 397147 9/10/2015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 222.36 381801 49181004 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 662.47- RETURN PRODUCT 381803 49181029 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 547.78 381802 50197353 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 573.60 381562 50762900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 681.27 397148 9/10/2016 131877 PETTY CASH 11.79 BANDAIDS 381674 090315 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 14.99 BIRTHDAY CAKE 381674 090315 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 32.00 UNIFORM 381674 090315 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 58.78 397149 9/10/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 4.06 381564 2841820 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,704.00 381563 2841825 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,704.00 381531 2841829 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.16 381529 2843545 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,237.12 381630 2843546 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 1.16 381567 2843547 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 16.24 381565 2843548 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.16 381534 2843549 5862.6512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 16.24 381533 2843550 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,458.00 381566 2843551 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,458.00 381532 2843552 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,367.40 381734 2845447 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 297.80 381738 2845451 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 1.16 381736 2845452 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 0 1.16 381731 2845453 •5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING • • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397149 9/10/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 456.62 381739 2845454 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,885.42 361735 2845456 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,260.88 361733 2645457 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 54.16 381732 2845458 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 477.21 361737 2845461 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 20,402.95 397150 9/10/2015 100953 PHYSIO -CONTROL INC. 700.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 381869 416026213 1470.6160 DATAPROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 397151 9/10/2015 100119 PING 101.02 GOLF BAG 381870 12963810 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 101.02 397152 9/10/2015 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 291.50 381566 25235 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 291.50 397153 9/10/2015 100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 756.16 REBUILD KITS 00001585 381511 0065629 -IN 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 756.16 397154 9/10/2015 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.89 PEST CONTROL 381652 5005349 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.89 397155 9/10/2015 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 1,155.84 POSTCARD POSTAGE 381804 OPEN STREETS 1120.6235 POSTAGE - ADMINISTRATION 1,155.84 397156 9/10/2015 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 950.00 GPS SYSTEM 381653 IN200-1006161 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 950.00 397157 9/10/2015 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 145.96 TINES 00006394 381654 CD1937656 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 512.60 TINES, BLADES 00006404 381655 CD1939141 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 658.56 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397158 9/10/2015 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. Continued... 866.25 CRS2 381656 5104 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 761.75 CRS2 381657 5114 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,628.00 397159 9/10/2015 125936 REINDERS INC. 3,319.42 FUNGICIDE 00002065 381607 3033766-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,319.42 397160 9/10/2015 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 36,187.38 AUG 2015 SERVICE 381871 3902108 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 36,187.38 397161 9/10/2015 119854 RHINO 467.43 MH MARKERS 00001413 381808 63082 5923.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 467.43 397162 9/10/2015 137023 RITE 8,120.00 50TH LIQUOR - POS SYSTEM 3131658 4024 5800.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,120.00 SOUTHDALE - POS SYSTEM 381658 4024 5800.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,120.00 GRANDVIEW - POS SYSTEM 381658 4024 5800.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24,360.00 397163 9/10/2015 100982 ROTO -ROOTER 259.00 CLEAR FLOOR DRAIN 381811 04818661154 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 259.00 397164 9/10/2015 124447 RUM RIVER BRASS BAND 100.00 OPEN STREETS ON 50TH EVENT 381659 090115 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 100.00 397165 911012015 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 459.13 PARTS WASHER SERVICE/SOLVENT 381660 67756025 5422.6162 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 117.18 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 381512 R002206146 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 576.31 397166 9/10/2015 137032 SCHULZE, CARTER 139.15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 381872 090315 1261.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 139.15 397167 9110/2015 100995 SEH is 0 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 — 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397167 9/10/2016 100996 SEH Continued... 2,049.47 54TH ST BID DOCS 381812 301479 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 29,917.81 ARDEN PARK PROJECT 381815 301481 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 16,905.23 ARDEN PARK PROJECT 381815 301481 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 25,902.82 ARDEN PARK PROJECT 381815 301481 03487.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 13,490.82 ARDEN PARK PROJECT 381815 301481 04407.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST RECONSTRUCTION 16,019.18 VALLEY VIEWITRACY IMPROV 381816 301482 01430.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 11,381.29 WHITE OAKS RD CONSTR 381814 301483 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MORN'SIDEA& WHITE OAKS RECON 11,381.30 WHITE OAKS RD CONSTR 381814 301483 01438.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MorningsideA & White Oaks C 13,151.18 PARKLAWN AVE RECON 381817 301484 01429.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PARKLAWN: FRANCE TO 78TH RECON 1,020.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES 381813 301906 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 141,219.87 397168 9/10/2015 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 63.35 HOT DOG BUNS 381423 270598 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 63.35 397169 9/10/2015 137015 SMITH, CHRISTINE 11.65 BIRTHDAY PARTY CANCELED 381475 REFUND 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 160.00 BIRTHDAY PARTY CANCELED 381475 REFUND 5701.4557 BIRTHDAY RENTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 171.65 397170 9/10/2015 105739 SNAZA, DAVID 65.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 381661 083115 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 65.98 397171 9/10/2015 136580 SOCIABLE CIDER WERKS LLC 350.00 381740 1484 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 350.00 397172 9/10/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 68.75 381569 1319948 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,868.80 381744 1321719 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 815.00 381745 1321720 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,203.25 381535 1321721 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,100.38 381571 1322413 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 554.40 381570 1322414 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 3,069.68 381743 1322415 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9,673.32 381742 1322416 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.00 381741 1322417 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,366.43 381573 1322418 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 27 Business Unit VERNON SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS RESERVE PROGRAM • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 — 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397172 9/10/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 7,991.18 381572 1322419 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 36,714.19 397173 9/10/2016 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 372.08 PENCILS 381873 0000760148 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 372.08 397174 9/10/2015 105842 STAR EQUIPMENT INC. 239.53 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 381818 731499 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 239.53 397175 9/10/2015 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 729.32 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 381662 100061655 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 729.34 EDINALIQUORADS 381662 100061655 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 729.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 381662 100061655 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,188.00 397176 9/10/2015 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 350.48 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 381874 ACCT 1808753 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 350.48 397177 9/10/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 247.75 361746 6288 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 247.75 397178 9/10/2015 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 479.84 TIRES 381513 10134590 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 479.84 397179 9/10/2015 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 500.00 MOVIE RENTAL 381429 DB2088326 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 500.00 397180 9/10/2015 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA 315.79 CONCESSION PRODUCT 381819 509010052 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 315.79 397181 9/10/2015 105006 TASER INTERNATIONAL 2,835.76 TASERS 381663 S11408925 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 2,835.76 • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 27 Business Unit VERNON SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS RESERVE PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397181 9/10/2015 105006 TASER INTERNATIONAL Continued... 397182 9/10/2015 104932 TAYLOR MADE 1,027.11 APPAREL 381875 31008764 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 255.34 381876 31031077 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 97.21 381877 31085627 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,379.66 397183 9/10/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 96.25 381821 916070 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 261.10 381820 917518 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 359.35 397184 9/10/2015 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 381664 2015-134816 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 381664 2015-134816 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 381664 2015-134816 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 990.00 397185 9/10/2015 102636 TIMEMARK INCORPORATED 234.84 TRAFFIC COUNTING SUPPLIES 00002511 381822 115356 1262.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION 234.84 397186 9/10/2016 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 265.00 PARK BOARD MEETING 381514 M21555 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 265.00 8/18/15 COUNCIL MEETING 381665 M21556 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 530.00 397187 9/10/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 121.76 WELDING WIRE, NOZZLES 00005640 381430 10096108 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.76 397188 9/10/2015 123649 TOWMASTER 117.63 TERMINAL, PLUG, CAP 00005612 381431 372291 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.63 397189 9/10/2015 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 2,104.00 PEDESTAL POLE SETUP 00001196 381666 85522 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,104.00 397190 9/10/201 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE • • • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page- 29 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Morningside Water Main Lining YORK SELLING GOLF CARS DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING PLANNING • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2095 -- 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397190 9/10/2015 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE Continued... 115.75 AUG 2015 USAGE 381461 269634-AUG15 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 115.75 397191 9/10/2015 102175 TRUCK UTILITIES INC. 1,538.75 CHAINS, RETAINER, SPRINGS 00003655 381878 0267788 1470.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,538.75 397192 9/10/2015 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 24,313.54 WATERMAIN CLEARING 381823 21837 05556.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 24, 313.54 397193 9/10/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 543.06 LIQUOR BAGS 381824 360320-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 543.06 397194 9/10/2015 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 53.31 SPRING 00006408 361667 826150030 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 53.31 397195 9/10/2015 101064 VESSCO INC. 1,045.00 TRANSDUCER INSTALL 00001537 381515 64189 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,045.00 397196 9/10/2015 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 514.00 SPRINKLER REPAIRS 381825 SP005899 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 514.00 397197 9/10/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 215.85 BOX COVERS 00001543 381826 9602362 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 113.53 SQUAD POWER DROPS 00001562 381432 9612676 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 329.38 397198 9/10/2015 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 456.75 381576 63244 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 456.75 397199 9/10/2015 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,875.00 4TH QTR RETAINER 381462 215028 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,875.00 • 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page- 29 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Morningside Water Main Lining YORK SELLING GOLF CARS DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING PLANNING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397200 9/10/2015 130839 WALTON'S HOLLOW Continued... 1,005.00 BARNYARD BOOGIE - 9/19/15 381476 5014 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 1,005.00 397201 9/10/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 39.22 TRASH REMOVAL 381516 7213069 5511.6162 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 39.22 397202 9/10/2015 137031 WIETGREFE, STEVE 156.00 CROSSTOWN CAMERA CLUB EXHIBIT 381879 090415 6101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 156.00 397203 9/10/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 985.44 381751 7045265 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,896.88 381750 7045267 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 62.73 361749 7045268 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,945.05 397204 9/10/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,390.37 381586 1080364882 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,442.00 381538 1080364935 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,384.35 381537 1080364939 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 408.30 381536 1060364941 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 11,241.79 381581 1080364954 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 722.30 381580 1080364956 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 73.15 361591 1060365755 6862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,575.59 381585 1080367690 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,280.70 381587 1080367691 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 26.66 381588 1080367692 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,008.58 381592 1080367693 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,455.12 361584 1080367804 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 73.15 361590 1080367805 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,911.32 381589 1080367806 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 302.30 381582 1080367807 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20,937.26 381583 1080367808 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 480.00- 381387 2080102770 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57,752.94 397205 9/10/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 6,435.95 381544 1090459605 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING • 96.60 381543 1090459606 •5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLIN* 0 • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Council Check Register by GL Page - 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation P0# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 397205 9/10/2016 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued... 4,812.35 381542 1090459609 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 355.60 381828 1090459711 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,317.25 381541 1090460560 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 476.75 381539 1090460641 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 46.20 381540 1090460642 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,043.10 381753 1090463367 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,058.50 381752 1090463368 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 511.20 381829 1090463369 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 19,153.50 397206 9/10/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 76.30 51-0193479-4 381463 469008979 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 3,433.00 51-4159265-8 381668 469069976 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,678.50 51-5107681-4 381480 469081601 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 2,278.51 51-5547446-1 381481 469098596 1628.6186 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 91.134 51-6692497-0 381437 469125647 1460.6186 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 183.95 51-8987646-8 381438 469137872 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,873.13 51-9011854-4 381434 469138355 5913.6185 LIGHT &POWER DISTRIBUTION 7,541.16 51-9603061-0 381479 469150828 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 40.19 51-0010103585-7 381468 469152522 5210.6165 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 164.25 51-9608462-5 381433 469153323 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,285.22 51-0010060454-7 381478 469159406 5210.6185 LIGHT& POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5.30 51-0010504853-2 381467 469163253 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.56 51-0010619788-5 361466 469168417 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.43 51-0010619810-4 381465 469173769 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 81.14 51-0010838463-7 361464 469177322 5936.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC 11.14 51-0010876027-9 381469 469188475 1322.6165 LIGHT& POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 32.05 51-4151897-6 381443 469257101 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9,912.08 51-4827232-6 381439 469259225 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 29,362.13 51-4621797-2 381477 469260065 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 81.46 51-5936955-6 381435 469273486 5937.6185 LIGHT & POWER INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 33.12 51-7567037-0 381440 469291907 1321.6185 LIGHT& POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 33.81 51-8102668-0 381441 469303563 1321.6185 LIGHT& POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 674.96 51-9251919-0 381442 469310092 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 405.40 51-6046826-0 381444 469456291 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,412.29 51-6121102-5 361669 469462730 1646.6165 LIGHT& POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 178.21 51-9337452-8 381445 469504431 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,457.06 51-5634814-2 381436 469636151 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 563.28 51-6229265-9 381482 469646015 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 2,050.66 51-6229265-9 381482 469646015 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 397206 9/10/2015 Council 101726 XCEL ENERGY 31,180.51 51-4888627-1 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 877.01 51-4888627-1 Continued... 3,721.13 51-6840050-6 LIGHT & POWER 381881 100,751.78 LIGHT & POWER 397207 9110/2015 LIGHT & POWER 129331 YOUNG, PAUL 175.00 BARNYARD BOOGIE 175.00 397208 9/10/2015 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 1,317.50 1,317.50 397209 9/10/2015 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 194.15 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 194.15 1,697,803.27 Grand Total 381470 090115 1627.6103 381754 16088 5842.5513 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 32 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 381830 54061944 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,204,277.79 A/PACH Payment 493,525.48 Total Payments 1,697,803.27 ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 9/10/2015 — 9/10/2015 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Continued... 381881 469967516 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 381881 469967516 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER 381880 470341594 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER 381470 090115 1627.6103 381754 16088 5842.5513 9/9/2015 8:58:09 Page - 32 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 381830 54061944 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,204,277.79 A/PACH Payment 493,525.48 Total Payments 1,697,803.27 ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS • • R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 9/10/2015 - 9/10/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 150,264.00 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 134.10 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 85,370.10 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 162.95 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 324,567.01 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 11,381.30 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 747.48 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,713.00 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,617.42 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 11,134.71 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 12,338.03 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 51,314.94 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 1,099.94 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 826.27 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,469.52 05800 LIQUOR FUND 287,924.59 05900 UTILITY FUND 619,676.39 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 77,204.78 05950 RECYCLING FUND 36,187.38 07400 PSTFAGENCY FUND 4,786.59 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 12,136.82 09235 VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST 745.95 Report Totals 1,697,803.27 • 9/9/2015 8:58:36 Page - 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures date 9 // a /, T e t { i • • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL C4 Lqu ' • l�C�RPORP`'iE� • 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. C. From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015. Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the August 5, 2015 Traffic Safety Committee Report at their August 20 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. Attachments: • Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 • Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of August 20, 2015 G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\TRANSPORTATION DIV\Traffc Safety Committee\City Council Reports\2015\Item IV. C. Traffic Safety Report of August 5, 2015.docx -- _r -- . AOAI I A i M,6 c.. _ rJ:__ WII.I [[A')A Traffic Safety Report Wednesday, August 05, 2015 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on August 05. The Public Works Director, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and a Police Sergeant were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these can be included on the August 20 Edina Transportation Commission and the September 16 City Council agenda. Section A: Items which staff recommends for approval A I .Request for restriping of Southview Lane from Concord Avenue to Sherwood Avenue This request concerns the lanes on Southview Lane. Currently the in street pedestrian sign cannot be placed on the double -yellow line for school bus and truck exiting capabilities. This offset creates a confusing situation. Historical count data in this location indicates a volume of 3,000-4,500 and an 85th percentile speed of approximately 30 mph. The road is 38 feet wide and has one lane in each direction as well as a parking lane on the south side. The double yellow line is on the centerline of the roadway, which makes the northern side 19 feet wide as a driving lane, while the southern side has an eleven (1 1) foot wide driving lane, and an eight (8) foot parking lane. Previous requests had concerns with specifically westbound traffic traveling too quickly and inattentively. This is an approved primary bicycle route. After review, staff recommends painting an eight (8) foot shoulder on the north side of the road to narrow the available space to drivers. The in street pedestrian Map : Southview Lane restriping area requested sign will be moved to the centerline and replaced as needed. The Traffic Safety Committee also encourages the schools in this area to add crossing guards, as they are not currently used at this location. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 1 of 12 • • A2.111equest for improvement of crosswalk safety at Concord Avenue and Concord Terrace, especially at school release This request concerns the crosswalk from F Southview middle school to Concord Terrace, across Concord Avenue. At school release times several children cross this street, and Map : Concord Avenue and Concord Terrace buses park on Concord Terrace. Issues observed with the crosswalk include a lack of drivers yielding to children who have signaled their intention to cross, but are not yet in the traveled way, and children who are standing on the pedestrian ramp on the school side, simply talking and not crossing. This behavior is - 'Y interpreted by many drivers as an attempt to 00100 - cross and stop their vehicles; this causes confusion due to the children not crossing. Other concerns that were seen on the video Photo : Crosswalk at Concord Avenue and Concord Terrace included the appearance of fast speeds, jaywalking and crossing in the crosswalk that was not painted on the south side of the intersection. The current crosswalk is not painted in the ladder style for school zones as recently adopted as city policy, but is instead painted as a continental crossing. The east side of this crosswalk is only a landing pad and pedestrian ramp as pedestrian infrastructure, with no sidewalk planned. After review, staff found that this crosswalk should be painted in the city's school zone standard "Ladder Style" crosswalk, this will be done before school returns to session. Further, city staff encourages the schools to add crossing guards at marked crosswalks surrounding elementary schools. A3.111equest for lowering of speeds on Interlachen Boulevard This request comes from a resident on Interlachen Boulevard who feels that the traffic speeds are too high, and does not believe r enforcement is having enough of an effect. The requestor is excited for the sidewalk construction but explains that the speeds present on Interlachen will prevent this street from ever being truly pedestrian friendly, or otherwise a �. y comfortable street for non -motorized traffic. This request specifically regards the segment fromn Blake Road to Vernon Avenue. Traffic counts"' indicate and ADT of 7000-9000 and an 85th- .i. Photo : The hills of Interlachen Boulevard, looking west from percentile speed of 34-38 mph. Interlachen has an Cooper Avenue average width of 32.1 feet and has bike lanes in each direction. While exact measurements vary, the average bike lane is about 4.6 feet wide and the average drive lane is 11.5 feet wide. Long term projections for reconstruction of Interlachen have this stretch thought to be reconstructed within a decade. Until then, the resident would like consideration of other ways to calm traffic. Currently the bike lane uses a four (4) inch fog line, whereas Edina Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 2 of 12 Industrial Boulevard uses a 6 inch line, there is not enough space to create protected bikeways or otherwise further narrow the roadway while maintaining bike lanes until reconstruction. There have been nine (9) accidents on Interlachen Boulevard between 49th Street and the Interlachen Country Club in the last five years, speed was not specifically entered in any crash report, but is listed as possible contributing factors for the types of accidents listed. Common accidents were right angle crashes and rear end crashes with three (3) each. After review, staff found that the high speeds on Interlachen Boulevard warranted traffic calming as soon as possible. Dynamic speed display signs (DSDS) were seen as a valuable and practical solution which could be installed in conjunction with the Interlachen Sidewalk project. Up to three (3) of these signs will be added to the plans for the Interlachen Sidewalk project, with location to be determined by the Traffic Safety Coordinator. A4.Request for creating a safer intersection of Larada Lane and Willow Wood Road Requestor notes that the control of the intersection of Larada Lane and Willow Wood Road creates unsafe conditions at the intersection. Larada Lane is the main road, and in a one day study had 576 vehicles enter on it, while only 248 entered using Willow Wood Road. One accident has occurred at this intersection in the past five years (2014), and it was listed with inadequate sight distance as a contributing factor to both vehicles involved. A 20 mph design speed would require 225 feet of clear sight distance (25 mph is 280 feet and 30 mph is 335 feet). Southbound Larada can be seen by a stopped, westbound vehicle on Willow Wood only 180 feet away, with the obstruction being the ground level, northbound Larada can also be seen only 210 feet away, with the obstruction being trees Map : Willow Wood Road and Larada Lane, Schaefer is on outside of the city mandated intersection 30 -foot the far right (east) of this aerial. clear zone. If the stop signs were switched, = r� Southbound Larada, when stopped would have 260 feet of clear view for westbound Willow Wood without any tree trimming, and at least 320 feet if trimming were to take place. _ Northbound Larada can see only 185 feet of — eastbound Willow Wood currently, but the two large trees and other landscaping blocking sight distances in this location could be removed which would provide well in excess of 200 feet of sight distance. After review, staff recommends making this intersection an all -way stop. This photo : An engineering intern waves to the camera at the decision was made because of inadequate intersection of Larada Lane and Willow Wood Road sight distances and the accident history at the intersection showed a need to improve sight distances. Reversing the two way stop was considered, but was decided against, as it would not have solved the sight distance issues Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 3 of 12 L' • • 0 • without clearing a neighbor's landscaping from the edge of the intersection clear zones, and then would be stopping only the major approach, which would lead to drivers ignoring the stop sign. An all -way stop in this location was seen as the only way to gain adequate sight distances, and discourage mainline traffic from ignoring a traffic control device. Further improvements of the existing sightlines were seen as impossible because the landscaping was outside of the intersection clear zone or was the ground level itself which blocked sight lines. AS.Request for a marked crosswalk across Arcadia Avenue, midblock, south of Gus Young Lane - I-0 - A __-c This request comes a person who works in the City of Edina who notes that although the ""+4 sidewalk on Arcadia changes sides of the road, and 1 there exist pedestrian curb cuts on each side of the road, there is no marking or signage for the crosswalks in this location, making it an unusual condition that should be marked. The City of t Edina crosswalk warrants specify that crosswalks Photo : Two pedestrians cross Arcadia, from the camera. will only be placed at intersections, but also that crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. Two weekdays of video were analyzed for this study, with 23 pedestrians crossing between 12:15 and 2:15 PM on the first day, the midday peak the next day had 18 pedestrian crossings in two hours. After review, staff recommends placing the crosswalk as a painted crossing. The number of persons crossing at this location met warrants, and the fact that this location was mid - block was outweighed by the fact that the sidewalk changed sides at this location and was only present on one side of the road at a time. Section B: Items staff recommends for denial B 1. Request for improvement of crosswalk safety north of the Browndale Bridge This request was forwarded to the Traffic Safety Coordinator by the City Engineer. A camera was set up and analyzed. Common occurrences which could be considered unusual or unintended were jaywalking (occasionally obstructing vehicle traffic), not obviously observing traffic before crossing, and standing near one end of the crosswalk without crossing. An acceptable crossing gap may take up to a minute to form, but the staff person watching the video did not think that there were few enough gaps to warrant a rapid rectangular flashing beacon (RRFB). Most crossings were seen as uneventful, routine, safe, and undelayed. Map : Crosswalk in question on Browndole Avenue Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 4 of 12 After review, staff found that a safety issue was not present. Thus, denial was recommended of this item. B2. Request for improvement of vehicle safety on 4200 block of Grimes Avenue This request comes from a resident who is concerned about the 4200 block of Grimes Avenue, with a large, steep, and sudden hill blocking sight distance for oncoming directions, the street is only 25.5 feet wide and observed parking demand can make the oncoming directions have less room than would be comfortable to pass each other if an encounter were to take place. Using the contour map from the city, it was found that a large portion of the hill, starting 150 feet after the descent (northbound) or before the plateau (southbound), and extending all the way to the intersection of Grimes and 42nd Street. There is a sidewalk on one side of Grimes in this location. The grade was measured and found to be maximum at I I -degrees, which is the equivalent of a 19.5 -percent grade. No accidents have been reported due to the sight -distance in this location in the past five years. After review, staff determined that while uncomfortable, this area of Grimes Avenue is safe. This decision was made while considering that the Living Streets plan would recommend this street be built with as little as 24 feet in width. The discomfort while cresting this hill should encourage slower speeds and acts itself as traffic calming. B3. Request for speed limit sign on the west end of Division Street This request comes from a resident who believes that traffic on Division Street's western end, where it transitions into Cooper Avenue and Circle East. This resident would like a speed limit sign to inform drivers of the speed limit at this location, but is open to discussing other options. A counter was placed in this location, and found that there was an 85th -percentile speed of 32.4 mph and 38 drivers going at least 35 mph in an average weekday; with an ADT of 835 this accounts for a 4.5 -percent of all drivers. The weekends had less speeding, Friday had the highest speeds, with 4.9 percent exceeding 35 mph. After review, staff found that speeding was a minor issue on this roadway, and drivers' ignorance of the speed limit was not Map : Division Street is circled, on the west it turns into Circle, the Grandview area is in the south east of this aerial Photo : Division Street at its western end. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 5 of 12 • • • 0 �J considered to be a main contributing factor on speeding on residential roadways. Thus, no signage is recommended for this area, however the speed report has been forwarded to the police department for targeted enforcement. 134. Request for speed limit sign on Malibu Drive's north end This request comes from a resident on the northern end of Malibu Drive, who believes that traffic entering the neighborhood is traveling at too fast of a pace, and would like a speed limit sign to limit this behavior. A counter was placed on Malibu Drive, and found that the 85th_ Percentile speeds were 28.9 mph on weekdays with an average of 31 drivers exceeding the 35 mph, and an ADT of 2565 vehicles per day. Thus, vehicles exceeding 35 mph constituted 1.2 - percent of all vehicles. Similar speeds and ratios were seen on the weekend, with 1.5 -percent exceedance on Saturday, and an 85th -percentile speed of 30.1 mph. After review, staff recognizes that speeding in this area is a minor issue on this roadway, and drivers' ignorance of the aerial speed limit was not considered to be a main contributing factor on the speeding. Thus, no signage is recommended for this area, however the speed report has been forwarded to the police department for targeted enforcement. Upon learning of the numbers found by the speed control, the requestor insisted that they were incorrect, however the counter used over 90 percent of its tube strikes, which is seen as an indicator of accuracy. Photo : A dynamic speed sign on the north end of Malibu Drive BS. Request for stop signs on St. John's to slow traffic and discourage use of the street This request comes from the Golf Terrace neighborhood, where there exists concerns that St. John's Avenue is too long without a stop condition, which leads to speeding and vehicles using St. John's to access the neighborhood. A count was taken on St. John's north of Oak Drive, 150 vehicles used this portion of the road, and the 85th -percentile speed was seen as 25 mph. All cross streets were not counted, but 56th Street, which currently stops for- Saint John's, has an ADT of ls 365 vehicles and an 85th -percentile speed of 24 mph, Golf Terrace, which currently intersects St. John's as an all -way stop has an ADT of 550 Map : St. John's Avenue in the Golf Terrace Neighborhood Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 6 of 12 and an 85th -percentile speed of 27.7 mph. These volumes would not warrant four-way stops, but would indicate that stop signs could be adjusted such that they provide a stop condition to St. John's Avenue instead of other side streets. Stop sign warrants are seen in appendix B. After review, staff recommends that this request be denied. Higher volumes and speeds existed on other streets intersecting St. John's Ave. and using stop signs as traffic diversion or calming devices is unsupported and prohibited by the city's stop sign warrants. B6. Request for crosswalk across West 66th Street at Naomi Drive This request comes from a neighbor who wishes for a crossing at the intersection of Naomi Dr. and W. 66th St. The requestor would like a crosswalk from Naomi Dr. across 66th St. to the park. A video study was performed over a weekend in late June. The resulting analysis showed a maximum of 13 people crossing 66th Street at this location in any two hour period. This is less than the warrants specified in city policy of 20 crossing sin a two hour period. The full crosswalk warrants may be seen in Appendix A. After review, staff recommends denial of this request due to not meeting crosswalk volume warrants. In discussion of further warrants, such as adjacent to public parks and having a high concentration of children, staff noted that Edina's crosswalk warrants are much looser than MnDOT recommends, and a lowering of the needed volume by one third is too much to be justified by engineering judgement. Section C : Items recommended by staff for more review C I .Request for traffic calming on Maple Road from 50th Street to 49th Street This request comes from a resident who believes that Maple Road has a high amount of traffic using it as a bypass to 50th Street and France Avenue. While the road had an ADT of 1210 vehicles per day, the 85th -percentile west (left) of this aerial Photo Street, looking east from Warren, Naomi is the enterinir street on the rilyht cut -through traffic route is shown with the arrow. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 7 of 12 • E, • • speeds were seen to be 28 mph. Sidewalks are present on both sides of this street. There have been no reported accidents due to this condition in the last five years. The road is 29.5 feet wide from face of curb to face of curb, Further discussions with the requestor revealed that the volume of vehicles, while seen as a nuisance, was not the focus of the request, but the short block means that the acceleration of vehicles to get up i_ to 28 miles per hour would make it harder to Photo : 50' Street at its intersection with Maple Road break within a normal perception -reaction time, as well as the speed of turns from 50th Street to Maple, as is necessitated by the few and small gaps in 50th Street traffic. These turning vehicles do not look for pedestrians and thus make jaywalking in the middle of the block safer than crossing at the legal crosswalk at the corner. Other further concerns include aggressive driving in general by what is seen by the requestor as non -local traffic. After review, staff does not recommend physical traffic calming measures. A separate measure seen as possible was restricting left turns during the evening rush hour at 50th Street and Maple Road. Because this change would affect such a large number of properties, it was decided that these effected properties should be sent a letter asking for comments on the possible change. D Items: Other items handled by Traffic Safety D 1. A resident from 4015 West 65th Street called requesting that concrete trucks for the construction at 6500 France no longer block the sight distance for turning left out of the apartments' driveway. The resident requested that all trucks be stored within the future building's footprint for all staging of the project. In a visit, the manager on site agreed to move the signage and store their trucks further from the driveway, and moved signage to allow for it. D2. An additional warrant analysis was conducted on a crosswalk in the Morningside neighborhood, at Alden Avenue and 42nd Street, this crosswalk met warrants in the reanalysis and was placed as planned in the reconstruction project. D3. A reinvestigation of Edina Industrial Boulevard took place after painting shoulders on the roadway, the 85th -percentile speed remained 38 mph, but the top speeds were reduced from 50+ mph to 42 mph. D4. A resident wanted lane assignments at the intersection of Vernon, Gus Young and Interlachen to be posted for all legs on signal arms over the intersection, this has been forwarded to Hennepin County's transportation division, as Vernon is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. D5. Resident was concerned about yielding behavior of vehicles to pedestrians as staff investigated the possibility of sandwiching signs on 55th and Xerxes and requested that the crosswalk have an in -street pedestrian sign placed in this location. This was done for two weeks to alert drivers to the crossing and ensure that the drivers did not become accustomed to the sign. 40D6. A Property company wanted to know what the official address of a plat was and possible ways to start to change the address such that it would not read France Avenue. The company was referred to the county, whose maps and plats the city uses. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 8_ of 12 • D7. A resident wanted the City of Edina to retime pedestrian signals on York Avenue to prevent people from ending their crossing in the street. After collecting numbers of crossings and an approximate percent who would require additional crossing time, the data was forwarded to the county with suggested pedestrian improvements in the area. The county controls the signals in the locations specified. D8. A resident had guests who received tickets for parking too near a fire hydrant, and wished to know if someone could show where the fire hydrant's no parking zone extends to. This was done with pink survey paint. D9. A resident was concerned with delays at 56th Street and France Avenue as the 54th Street bridge was being reconstructed. The queues described have reduced in length, and not presented themselves to staff. The Traffic Safety Coordinator will continue to monitor the situation until the bridge is reopened. D 10. A driver asked for York and Edinburough to be investigated as she was in an accident in the intersection. The crosswalk pedestrian signage appears to be a stop sign was the concern. This was forwarded to the county, and work is progressing on a warrant analysis of the crash diagrams. D 11. A driver requested information on when signs were placed at the Edina Liquor parking lot, prohibiting left hand turns onto Gus Young Lane, the new signs' placement date was provided, as was an observation that although records were not found for previous years, a 2008 Google Streetview image clearly showed the sign. D 12. A resident wanted to ensure that an accident report had been filed and check actions taken subsequently, for an accident the requestor had witnessed in Edina. The police report was not available for public release, but details were provided for the report. D 13. A requestor noted that the signal was mistimed in the Centennial Lakes district, along France Avenue. After some discussion, it was determined that the loop detector was not functional at this time, and the requestor was referred to the county's website, which has an online form specifically for broken detectors. D 14. A requestor asked for reclassifying lanes on 69th Street at its intersection with York Avenue, such that there would be a right turn only lane. The county was consulted on this issue and did not recommend that it move forward due to peak hour through volumes and the smaller number of right turns that were seen in their analysis. D 15. A requestor asked the sign shop for the removal of a deaf child sign, this sign was placed in 2013, and the contacts for its placement responded to contact in January and indicated that the sign was still important and needed. Therefore, the sign was not removed. D16. A requestor asked for stop signs to control speeders on Tracy Avenue between 66th and 701h Streets. An explanation of why stop signs are ineffective in this regard and other ways to address the issue led to the requestor not wishing for continuation of the request until a later reconstruction. D 17. A resident wanted the signs of the crosswalk on 55th and Xerxes to be double sided such that they • will highlight the other side of the road more. This was forwarded to the county for their consideration as Xerxes is a county road. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 9 of 12 • • D 18. A previous requestor called in to ask that a deaf child sign in place since 2000 be removed. The daughter who is deaf is now 16, driving and both she and her parents no longer see any need for the sign to remain in place, as she is not in the street playing, nor do they see other situations where this would be applicable. This sign and others from previous correspondence were sent to the sign shop for removal. D 19. A requestor reported a broken push button at 78th Street and Bush Lake Road, this was forwarded to the county, who controls the signal in this location. The county will look into fixing the pedestrian push button and indicator. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 10 of 12 • Appendix A: Crosswalk Warrants A. Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. B. Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has 20 or more pedestrian crossings in a two-hour period. C. Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the "Vehicle Gap Time". This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: 1) More than five gaps — pavement marking and signage only. 2) Less than five gaps — add actuated pedestrian signals. D. Crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 mph unless in conjunction with signalization. E. Other conditions that warrant crosswalks: 1) Routes to schools 2) Locations adjacent to libraries, community centers, and other high use public facilities. 3) Locations adjacent to public parks. 4) Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons cross a street. 5) Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street. • F. Crosswalks will only be placed at intersections. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 11 of 12 Appendix B: Stop Sign Warrants When it is determined that a full stop is always required on an approach to an intersection a STOP (111-1) sign shall be used. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs. The use of STOP signs on the minor -street approaches should, be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction with the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12 -month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users from the minor street failing to yield the right- of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. • Additional warrants from the city of Edina list that: 1. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 2. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. 3. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. 4. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 5. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 6. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. Traffic Safety Committee Report of August 5, 2015 Page 12 of 12 MINUTES OF • CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM August 20, 2015 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, La Force, Loeffelholz, Nelson, and Olson. ABSENT Iyer, Janovy, Rummel and Spanhake APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Chair Bass requested to add the May 21 minutes to the agenda for discussion. Motion was made by member Olson and seconded by member LaForce to approve the amended meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Reports of August 5 2015 A.1 & A.2 Sgt. Conboy is going to reach out to the school. Chair Bass suggested talking with the PTO to see if they could raise funds. A.3 Interlachen Blvd is not currently scheduled for reconstruction. B.2 Planner Nolan said this request was submitted by member Janovy and was denied a second time. Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Olson to forward the August 5, 2015, TSC report to the• City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. 0 1 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: September 16, 2015 o In vles�y • r�CORP08 K�� • Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is X❑ Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request For Purchase — Southdale Area Traffic Model and Transportation Study Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 31, 2015 Company: WSB & Associates, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: WSB & Associates, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: N/A Amount of Quote or Bid: $63,577.00 $63,577.00 The Southdale area is a vital hub of commercial, health care and residential activity for Edina and surrounding communities. Based on recently completed investments in the area and the high interest level for additional redevelopment of aging properties in the area, an update to our traffic model and a transportation study is warranted. This model will allow the City to more fully evaluate the impact of proposed land use and transportation changes in the area. Based on the information generated, the City should be able to more clearly advocate for additional improvements by partners at the County, Regional and State levels. In 2008, WSB assisted the City in the development of the original traffic model for the Southdale Area. This project will update that model and prepare a transportation analysis for two land use density scenarios. The results of the study will document the traffic needs on the roadways and analyze roadway geometrics and traffic control improvements required to accommodate future traffic growth. It will also analyze the existing and future pedestrian and bicycle system needs. Hennepin County recently completed intersection traffic movement counts on intersections along France and York Avenues. This information will be available to us and thus reduces the cost of our project. The project is listed in the Capital Improvement Plan under CIP #15-167 with a total budget of $125,000. Funding for the project will be utilized from the Centennial Lakes TIF District. Staff recommends approving the proposal with WSB & Associates, Inc. Attachments Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal GAI'MCENTRAL SMURANSPORTATION DMTmnsportation Studies\Southdale Tmnsportion Study\MIS0Item IV. D RFP.doa City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • • WSB - & Associates, In Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction c. August 31, 2015 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineer Edina Public Works 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55349 Re: Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Dear Mr. Millner: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541-1700 WSB & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to update the traffic and transportation models and prepare a transportation study for the Southdale area. As we have discussed, the project will involve updating the existing Synchro/SimTraffic traffic models in the Southdale area, updating the CUBE transportation planning model for the entire City and preparation of a transportation analysis for two land use density scenarios in the Southdale area. The study area was expanded to include area north of TH 62. A scope of works has been developed and is attached for your information. The estimated cost for the planning and engineering services will be based on our current hourly rates, and is estimated at $63,577. Also included is a breakdown of cost by task and the proposed schedule which assumes completion of the project by mid-February 2016. If the proposed Scope of Work and the associated fee appear to be appropriate, please sign a copy of the proposal and return to me at your earliest convenience. We will proceed immediately upon receipt of the signed contract. Thank you for consideration of WSB & Associates, Inc. for these professional planning and engineering services. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at 763-287-7183. Sincerely, WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. • Charles T. Rickart, PE, PTOE Principal/Project Manager CITY OF EDINA Authorized Signature Its Date Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study SCOPE OF WORK UNDERSTANDING In 2008 WSB assisted the City in the development of a traffic model for the Southeast area (Southdale) of the City. The study area was bounded by TH 62 (Crosstown) on the north, the Richfield/Edina border on the east, the Bloomington/Edina border on the south and TH 100 on the west. The model included 40 signalized intersections, 20 un -signalized intersections, and three roundabouts. The purpose in developing the model was to provide a consistent baseline for traffic analysis and to provide continuously updated results to help gauge the compound effect of multiple developments in the Southdale area. Since the model was completed, it has been used by several developers and the City in reviewing the area traffic impacts of proposed development. Although, the model has been continually updated with traffic characteristics from approved developments the original traffic conditions were based on 2007 traffic counts. It is now in need of updating and recalibration with new traffic counts. Also in 2008 WSB assisted the City in preparation of the Transportation Plan in conjunction with • the Comprehensive Plan update. As part of the Transportation Plan a city wide transportation planning model was developed for the existing and future land use projections. Sense the preparation of the land use projections in the Transportation Plan density changes have occurred in the Southdale area. In addition questions of the appropriate density have been asked for the area specifically on the west side of France Avenue. • In March of 2015 the City Council appointed a working group that developed the Working Principles for the France Avenue Southdale Area. These principals will serve as a tool to guide the development process for the whole Southdale area, and demonstrate methods that might be used during the Comprehensive Plan update in 2018. In order to provide data to assist in moving this process to the next stages, development of transportation forecasts should be completed. In discussions with City staff it was determined that the study area be expanded to include the area north of TH 62 to W 60th Street. Based on our understanding of the existing traffic and transportation models and the issues and concerns within the Southdale area we have developed the following work tasks to prepare the model updates and transportation study. Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Page 1 City Of Edina • WORK TASKS Task 1— Project Management This task includes planning and coordination of all work tasks, establishing and monitoring of the budget, communication with City Staff, and periodic meetings with staff on the project status. Task 2 — Data Collection Available traffic and land use data will be collected from the City of Edina, Hennepin County and MnDOT. This will include but not limited to; existing traffic volume data, traffic signal timing plans, approved development plans, roadway improvement plans, existing land use (population, households and employment) data, forecasted land use data, etc. In addition a field review to update and document the existing conditions will be conducted. In order to calibrate the traffic models additional traffic volume counts will be collected by WSB personnel. It is assumed that up to 20 intersection turning movement counts will be collected during the weekday AM peak hour, weekday PM peak hour, Saturday peak hour and the weekday off-peak hour. In addition up to 20 roadway segment, 48 hour directional average daily traffic counts would be collected. In conjunction with the vehicle traffic counting, pedestrian and bike counts will be conducted at up to 10 locations within the Southdale study area. Video cameras will be utilized in these • locations to document the existing pedestrian and bike utilization. The exact number and location of the counts will be determined after available data is received and reviewed. Task 3 — Traffic Model Update A Synchro/SimTraffic model has been prepared which includes 40 signalized intersections, 20 un -signalized intersections and 3 roundabouts. This model will be updated using the new traffic volume information, updated roadway configuration and signal timing information collected as part of Task 2. This task will also include expanding the model study area to include the area north of TH 62 to W 60th Street. It is anticipated that an additional 3 signalized intersections, 5 un -signalized intersections and 2 roundabouts will be added to the roadway network. The results of this task will be an updated 2015 base area model that can be used to evaluate traffic impacts as new development is proposed in the Southdale area. Task 4 — Transportation Plan Model Update The City's current Transportation Plan includes traffic projections to the year 2030. These projections are based on existing and future land use within the City. The CUBE transportation planning model was used to prepare the forecasts using the Metropolitan Councils roadway and • land use data as the base and then modified for the City of Edina. Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Page 2 City Of Edina This task will include updating the current model and projecting traffic to the year 2040 for the ofentire City using the existing Comprehensive plan land use (population, households and employment). For the Southdale area traffic forecasts will be prepared for an alternative land use scenario increasing the density to 50 units per acre. This information will then be used to determine the anticipated future traffic impacts on the area roadways (Task 5). Task 5 — Traffic Operational Analysis An operational analysis will be prepared using the area Synchro/SimTraffic model updated in Task 3. The future 2040 traffic conditions will be based on the forecasts developed as part of Task 4 and will evaluate two scenarios; the current Comprehensive Plan land use and the increased density land use. The analysis will document the traffic needs on the roadways in the Southdale area. This will include an analysis documenting the roadway geometric and traffic control improvements required in the area to accommodate existing and future traffic growth. Task 6 - Pedestrian and Bicycle Analysis An analysis of the existing and future pedestrian and bicycle system in the Southdale study area will be conducted. The analysis will include review of the local/regional system and identification of future connections or revisions based on the guidelines and requirements in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Task 7 — Meetings • It is anticipated that up to six (6) coordination meetings will held with the City. These will include the following: • City Staff (3) • Transportation Commission (1) • Planning Commission (1) • City Council Work Session(1) Should additional meetings be required they would be billed at our standard hourly rates. Task 8 - Report Preparation / Model Documentation WSB will prepare a memorandum report documenting the methodologies and analysis from the above tasks including any recommendations for roadway geometric or traffic control improvements. WSB would submit a draft report to the City for their review. The draft report will be presented to the Edina Transportation Commission, Planning Commission and City Council for review. WSB would then prepare a final report to incorporate any comments received from the City. Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Page 3 City Of Edina • • • ESTIMATED COST The estimated cost is based on the above scope of services. WSB & Associates, Inc. will bill for the actual hours worked at each employee classification times the current WSB hourly rates for that employee classification up to the maximum of $63,577. SCHEDULE City Approves Proposal.................................................................................... September 15, 2015 Tasks Edina Cost Task 1 — Project Management $4,704 Task 2 — Data Collection $14,456 Task 3 — Traffic Model Update $9,975 Task 4 — Transportation Planning Model Update $12,264 Task 5 — Traffic Operations Analysis $9,387 Task 6 — Pedestrian / Bike Analysis $5,502 Task 7 — Meetings $3,258 Task 8 — Report Preparation $3,531 Total Labor Cost $63,077.00 Expenses (Mileage, Printing, etc) $500.00 Total Project Cost $63,577.00 SCHEDULE City Approves Proposal.................................................................................... September 15, 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of September 21, 2015 Data Collection / Traffic Counts............................................................. September / October 2015 Traffic Model Update..............................................................................October / November 2015 Transportation Model Update..................................................................October / November 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of November 16, 2015 Traffic Operations Analysis................................................................. November / December 2015 Draft Report ....................................................................................................... December 11, 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of December 28, 2015 TACMeeting......................................................................................................... January 21, 2016 Planning Commission.....................................................................:...................... January 27, 2016 City Council Work Session................................................................................... February 2, 2016 FinalReport ......................................................................................................... February 12, 2016 Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Page 4 City Of Edina To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: September 16, 2015 0 �0 - ) con • ,ICOR Po"*VtiO • 1868 Agenda Item #: IV. E. The Recommended Bid is ❑X Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Authorize Non -Invasive Watermain Pipe Condition Assessment Services Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: September 8, 2015 Company: Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH), Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: $79,371.00 $79,371.00 Please recall the original contract amount for this project was approved at the August 18 City Council Meeting in the amount of $37,619.00. As we began to coordinate this work, we realized the Birchcrest A, Countryside B, and Countryside G were missing from the scope. Please recall we spent $109,125 to assess the 2016 projects. The updated proposal includes assessment of approximately 23,000 linear feet of watermain in our anticipated 2017 street reconstruction neighborhoods. SEH is coordinating Echologics workload between multiple municipalities in the area. This provides a savings to the City in mobilization costs. They will also coordinate data setup and analysis, GIS base mapping, traffic control, and on-site coordination during testing. These services will be funded by the utility fund and are scheduled for Fall 2015. Staff recommends increasing the service contract of $37,619 by $79,371 for a total contract of $1 16,990 to complete the non-invasive watermain pipe condition assessment in the anticipated 2017 street reconstruction neighborhoods. Attachment: • Engineering Proposal Update G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DMPROJECTMIMPR NOS1BA425 Birchcrest A(2017)1ADMIN\MISC\Item IV. E. RFP WM Pipe Cond_Assess Increase.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 0 A SEH Building a Better World for All of Us' SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT September 8, 2015 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 • Dear Chad • RE: City of Edina 2015 Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment SEH No. EDINA P-133639 We understand that in addition to the 6,976 feet of water main pipe (pipe) in its Normandale Park D Neighborhood, the City is considering non -invasively assessing the condition of another 16,567 feet of pipe in its Birchcrest A and Countryside B and G Neighborhoods. This could bring the total amount of pipe assessed during 2015 to 22,914 feet. We would provide our services for this additional 16,567 feet of pipe in accordance with this Supplemental Letter Agreement (SLA), our SLA executed August 18 for the Normandale Park D project and our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. We will complete this additional assessment for an estimated not -to -exceed fee of $79,371. This cost includes reimbursable expenses. For your reference, if directed to complete this additional assessment, our total estimated not -to -exceed fee for the 2015 project is summarized in the table below. Neighborhood(s) Pipe Length Estimated Not to (feet) Exceed Fee Normandale Park D 6,976 $37,619 Birchcrest A and Countryside B 15,218 $79,371 and G Neighborhoods Total Estimated Not -to -Exceed Fee for the $116,990 2015 Assessment Project Engineers 1 Architects I Planners I Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee -owned I sehinc.corn 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax Chad Millner • September 8, 2015 Page 2 If directed to complete the additional assessment, we will invoice the City for our work on a lump sum basis in a single invoice each month that combines the fees from this SLA and the SLA executed August 18. This SLA, our SLA executed August 18, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. As always, we look forward to serving the City assessing the condition of its water main pipes. Please contact me with questions and comments at 952.912.2611 or ppas_k_o(q7sehinc.com. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Paul J. Pasko III, PE • Project Manager pj p3 Enclosures c: Carter Schulze, City of Edina Mike Ostendorf, SEH Toby Muse, SEH Brian Turner, Echologics p:\ae\e\edina\13363911-gent\10-setup-conl103-proposal\09 03 15\0908 15 chad millner proposal Itr for pca.docx Accepted on this _day of 2015 City of Edina, Minnesota A • Name To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director o Le � A • "ACORPORp`��9 7968 Agenda Item #: IV.F. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015 - 87 Supporting a Funding Application of the City of Bloomington to the Westbound On-ramp to 1-494 at East Bush Lake Road Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution supporting the westbound on-ramp to 1-494 at East Bush Lake Road funding application by the City of Bloomington. Information/Background: The City of Bloomington is putting together a funding request to the Transportation Economic Development (TED) to create an on-ramp to 1-494 at East Bush Lake Road (See attached map). The westbound on-ramp to 1-494 at East Bush Lake Road (CSAH 28) was not constructed with the initial construction of 1-494 in this area due to conflicts with an existing railroad bridge. It is believed that providing westbound access to 1-494 at East Bush Lake Road (CSAH 28) would be beneficial to both the Normandale Lake District within the City of Bloomington, as well as redevelopment occurring within the City of Edina by improving the transportation network by diminishing congestion at access points to Minnesota Trunk Highway 100. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2015 - 87 • Design of the improvement project. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 0 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-87 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE WESTBOUND ON-RAMP TO I-494 AT EAST BUSH LAKE ROAD (CSAH 28) FUNDING APPLICATION TO BE MADE BY THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington intends to submit a funding application to construct a westbound on-ramp to I-494 at East Bush Lake Road; and WHEREAS, the Transportation Economic Development (TED) Program is a partnership between the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) that awards grants to fund state trunk highway projects that support growing industry and business and improve the transportation network for all users; and WHEREAS, the westbound on-ramp to I-494 at East Bush Lake Road (CSAH 28) was not constructed with the initial construction of I-494 in this area due to conflicts with an existing railroad bridge; and • WHEREAS, additional design options for the westbound on-ramp to I-494 at East Bush Lake Road (CSAH 28) have been considered and an on-ramp configuration has been evaluated that would no longer conflict with the existing railroad bridge; and WHEREAS, providing westbound access to I-494 at East Bush Lake Road (CSAH 28) would be beneficial to both the Normandale Lake District within the City of Bloomington, as well as redevelopment occurring within the City of Edina by improving the transportation network by diminishing congestion at access points to Minnesota Trunk Highway 100; and WHEREAS, constructing westbound access to I-494 will improve the efficiency and safety of the transportation network and promote economic growth by providing additional job opportunities through the expansion of local businesses; and WHEREAS, the 2015 TED Program solicitation will fund up to $30 million in capital assistance for highway improvement projects, with a maximum of $10 million provided to any one project; and WHEREAS, the TED Program funding would complement the federal grant funds awarded to the City of Bloomington on July 22, 2015, as well as other local funding to allow for the completion of the on-ramp improvement project. WHERAS, if awarded funding from the Transportation Economic Development (TED) • Program, the City of Bloomington has agreed to commit funding to aid in the completion of the project. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street o Edina, Minnesota 55424 • • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City df Edina to support the City of Bloomington in its pursuit of the Transportation Economic Development (TED) Program funds, and Adopted this 16th day of September, 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 16, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2015. City Clerk 0 0 0 W 78th Industrial Area A;1 W 77th St ii Normandale 'm Lake District Existing LOSE - Future LOS F Alternate Westbound Travel Routes E L Existing LOS D -Future LOSE Route] Project Location Route 2 + 0 0.25 os —•••–• Miles Route 3 f Project Area Traffic Issues - Existing and Future No Build Figure 1 1-494 and East Bush Lake Road Regional Solicitation Application City of Bloomington, MN 7M Weave _ }`J11I it u _1c .ry 'E 1St1n7 LOS D/ II I JSIM1 YY..BaVe -,F.11 ,LII..t O.7a[�a�� - — -_ Future LOSE -_ ii } ExistiLOS .1\ ' ��• � Futu9re'it�05 E r' J - f Sources: Esri, DeLorme,.NAVTEQ, TomTorri, Intermap, increment P'Corp., GE%O, USGS, FA©,,NPS, NRCAN, Geo.Basei'j[GN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, E,ri Japan, METI, Esri ChinaHon ( g Kong), swisstopo!iarid the GIS User W 78th Industrial Area A;1 W 77th St ii Normandale 'm Lake District Existing LOSE - Future LOS F Alternate Westbound Travel Routes E L Existing LOS D -Future LOSE Route] Project Location Route 2 + 0 0.25 os —•••–• Miles Route 3 f Project Area Traffic Issues - Existing and Future No Build Figure 1 1-494 and East Bush Lake Road Regional Solicitation Application City of Bloomington, MN r �g i 1 - � � � ;. 'k''«..Fr er)•'�I f`' WM1 rra 'ai�r� w•c' '� r r i ; i !� x- `°� , 'I t I° :a o�zcrm v o T:HG 4H_ _ M n m u' y 3 vrall oamw c.o 7N i', -T1 rte`..- �T i -tel a� 1 t x CITY OF BLOOMINGTON ;vry .t aura's o ra c eua; u � ro: yyL� I tgyarrnr $ far _ IVA LEGEND Q PAVED ROADWAY ® BRIDGES N RETAINING WALLS RAISED MEDIANS B, CURBS ® PAVED SHOULDERS ANDCSIDEWALI(SEO USE PATH PROPOSED POND LOCATION PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL © EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROPOSED RAMP METER SIGNAL P%LIMINAE� CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TTOE OF S PE) WETLANDS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY Project Overview 1-494 and East Bush Lake Road Regional Funding Application City of Bloomington A :(r„�lh:tll q�Y 6F } ” fon r ,mss IR '• 4f1 \i 411' P .5 w. r raaL..YnJx• i ez C• F . iadi - � - _ ' I ❑o-A�' l ; Ir'rlrMurt.rJ '� .� ; y 1(i I .ti` 1 14. 71 h I .i je SO IAL SECURITII ADMINISTRATION r 'irA�y .t / •4 F W y I J ,HENNEPIN COON! Figure 2 a m PRELIMINARY D SUBJECT TO CHANCF E 11/14/2014 Ai D Iso 300 p y �.+�• scala In feet G) ET LEGEND Q PAVED ROADWAY ® BRIDGES N RETAINING WALLS RAISED MEDIANS B, CURBS ® PAVED SHOULDERS ANDCSIDEWALI(SEO USE PATH PROPOSED POND LOCATION PAVEMENT REMOVAL PROPOSED TRAFFIC SIGNAL © EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROPOSED RAMP METER SIGNAL P%LIMINAE� CONSTRUCTION LIMITS (TTOE OF S PE) WETLANDS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY Project Overview 1-494 and East Bush Lake Road Regional Funding Application City of Bloomington A :(r„�lh:tll q�Y 6F } ” fon r ,mss IR '• 4f1 \i 411' P .5 w. r raaL..YnJx• i ez C• F . iadi - � - _ ' I ❑o-A�' l ; Ir'rlrMurt.rJ '� .� ; y 1(i I .ti` 1 14. 71 h I .i je SO IAL SECURITII ADMINISTRATION r 'irA�y .t / •4 F W y I J ,HENNEPIN COON! Figure 2 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: September 16, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV. G. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget X Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Emergency Water Main Lining in parts of Morningside Neighborhood Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Sept. 14, 2015 Company: FER-PAL Construction USA LLC Recommended Quote or Bid: FER-PAL Construction USA LLC Bid or Expiration Date: Nov. 14, 2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $947,157.20 $947,157.20 General Information: The Morningside area is one of the older neighborhoods in Edina dating back to the 1930's. The water system in Morningside is constructed mainly of unlined cast iron pipes. These unlined pipes allow iron to oxidize from the pipe wall. The iron material is the source of red -water complaints but also the iron combines with water to form ferric hydroxide. The ferric hydroxide is quite voluminous and forms deposits in the water main. These deposits greatly inhibit the ability of the watermains to pass high volume flows as required for firefighting efforts. The loss of flow capacity is a public safety issue. Please recall this summer we completed a water main cleaning project on Crocker, Lynn, and Oakdale Avenues, and Morningside Road. Water main cleaning removes the deposits within the pipe. This technology was selected to meet the following objectives: 1. Increase water flows for public safety 2. Reduce water color complaints 3. Fulfill the promise to the neighborhood that something would be done (improvements in this area started in 2008). 4. Potential $600,000 savings compared to our CIP budget estimates The cleaning project was completed in July and it fulfilled objectives I, 3, and 4. The attached pre -cleaning photos shows the amount of material that was removed from the inside the pipe. We also learned that some of the pipes have severe section loss. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER Page 2 With water main cleaning operations, it is understood that the inside of the unlined cleaned cast-iron water • main pipe takes some time to pacify and during this time colored water is normal. This is typically a 2-4 week process. Because residents continued to experience colored water after this timeframe, staff flushed the water main followed by continuous purging of the system from fire hydrants using garden hose sized pipes. Residents were also asked to flush their service lines in their basement utility sink or an outside hose bib. For three weeks while the purging operation was taking place, staff received little to no complaints about water color; however, as soon as the purging was reduced the complaints increased. By late Aug., the pipe was not pacifying as quickly as hoped, if at all, and because we cannot purge indefinitely we needed to determine a course of action. We conferred with staff and industry experts to determine our options as listed below: Options Benefits Cons Continue purging 1. Simple 1. Unknown if the pipe will pacify prior to water main winter 2. Addresses water color issue 2. Wasting water Add additional 1. Relatively inexpensive 1. Unknown if the pipe will pacify prior to water treatment winter chemicals 2. Difficult to complete for lack of infrastructure needed at the insertion point 3. Coordination - water is managed by another agency Open Cut 1. Cheaper than concrete and CIPP 1. Extremely impactful — would require full Replacement liner street replacement 2. Reduces risk of water color issues Concrete Liner 1. No need for pacifying I. Does not address the structural integrity of the pipe 2. Less impactful than open cut replacement 2. Past issues with re -instatement of water services 3. Reduces risk of water color issues CIPP Structural 1. Addresses the structural integrity of 1. Financial — out of current budget Liner the pipe 2. Timing — Short Notice 2. Increases the service life of the pipe by 50 -years 3. Reduces risk of water color issues City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 L� • REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 3 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER • Because of the short timeframe to implement the options listed above, it was decided that option 5, CIPP structural lining was the best option. It is the least impactful to the street, least risky to water services, and it addresses the structural integrity of the pipe. With winter quickly approaching it will be a challenge but it is possible to complete the entire project area. The biggest concern is the risk of freezing the temporary water as temperatures fall and this risk will be reduced by staging the project by street. Additonally, because of the short timeframe and changing temperatures, we did not have time to wait for the general lining contractor to solicit quotes for the temporary water system. Instead we solicited quotes for this work as a separate contract as noted in the attached companion request for purchase. One bid was received for the project in the amount of $947,157.20. This is out of budget. In the recently completed utility rate study, the budget shown in the CIP was adjusted from $725,000 over years 2015 and 2016 to $100,000 over those same two years. This was adjusted due to the anticipated success of the water main cleaning operation; therefore, there will be impacts to future projects in order to keep our rates consistent with the rate study. The attached `Anticipated Street Reconstruction 2015-2020' graphic shows the delays to specific neighborhood street reconstruction projects to fund the water main lining this year and keep our rates consistent with the rate study. Every year we review the cost of construction to determine if we can afford to complete projects within our current rate structure. This past year experienced a 6-8% inflation rate in the construction industry. We will continue to monitor these costs in comparison to our rate of reconstruction • This project will replace all the gate valves and fire hydrants within the project area. Our street reconstruction program is showing this neighborhood becoming a priority for street reconstruction in 4 to 5 -years. At that time we anticipate replacement of the water services and remaining gate valves and fire hydrants that are outside of the lining project limits. • With the specialized nature of this work and the bidding documents required, we selected a consultant with trenchless technology expertise to assist. That firm is SEH, Inc. and we have a long standing relationship with them on a variety of projects. Since our priority was to create contractor bidding documents, we did not have time to solicit a proposal for their services. A follow-up proposal will be forth coming if their services are above $20,000. Staff recommends awarding this project to FER-PAL Construction USA LLC. Attachments FER-PAL Water Main Lining Bid Request for Purchase Temporary Water Pre -Water Main Cleaning Photo Impacts to Anticipated Street Reconstruction Projects Graphic G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\CONTRACTS\2015\ENG IS-IONB WM Cleaning\WM556 M'Mde WM Cleaning\ADMIN\MISC\Item IV. G. Award of Quote-CIPP.docx City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: September 16, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV. G. a. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget ® Not Within Budget Subject: Authorize Watermain Temporary Water Services for parts of Morningside Neighborhood Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Sept. 3, 2015 Company: Palda and Sons, Inc. Northdale Construction Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Palda and Sons, Inc. Bid or Expiration Date: Nov. 3, 2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $97,448.00 $102,625.00 N/A $97,448.00 General Information: This is a companion Request for Purchase (RFP) to the Morningside Water Main Lining RFP. Due to the condensed timeframe, we did not have time to wait for the general lining contractor to solicit quotes, so we did. Palda has completed many successful projects in Edina, many of which require temporary water systems. This will be funded out of the water utility fund. Budget impacts are explained in the Morningside Water Main Lining RFP. Staff recommends awarding this contract to Palda and Sons, Inc. GAPMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PR0JECTS\C0NTRACTS\2015\ENG 15-I ONB WM Cleaning\WM556 Kside WM CleaninglADMIN\MISC\Item IV. G. a. Award of quote -Temp Water.docz City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • Pre-Watermain Cleaning Photos n Photo 1. Pre -Cleaning Pipe Sample G:\PW\CENTR,II SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\CONTRACTIUOI I\ENG IS-IONB WM Cleaning\WM556 M'side WM Cleaning\ADMIN\MISC\Pre Watermain Cleaning Photo.docx • 1 �j �j To: Mayor and City Council From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Date: September 16, 2015 Subject: Ordinance No. 2015-17 Adopting The Xcel Energy Franchise Extension Through January 15, 2016 Action Requested: Adopt the Ordinance on second reading. Information I Background: Attachment Agenda Item #: IV. H. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Action 0 Discussion ❑ Information ❑ ORDINANCE NO. 2015-17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TERM OF THE ELECTRIC FRANCHISE GRANTED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, DIB/A XCEL ENERGY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 2.1 of Ordinance No. 1995-4, An Ordinance Granting the Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Its Successors and Assigns, Permission to Construct, Operate, Repair and Maintain In the City of Edina, Minnesota, an Electronic Distribution System and Transmission Lines, Including Necessary Poles, Lines, Fixtures and Appurtenances, for the Furnishing of Electric Energy to the City, Its Inhabitants, and Others, and to Use the Public Ways and Public Grounds of the City for Such Purposes, is amended to extend the term of the franchise granted to Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy through January 15, 2016. SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the filing of the Company's written consent to the amendment with the City Clerk within ninety (90) days after its adoption by the City. First Reading: Second Reading: Attest: September I, 2015 September 16 September 17, 2015 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: September 17, 2015 Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk 183108v1 • • • • Agenda Item No. V. A PROCLAMATION CONSTITUTION WEEK WHEREAS, it is the privilege of all Americans to commemorate the two hundred twenty-eighth anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to officially recognize this magnificent document and the anniversary of its creation; and • WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuance of a proclamation by the President of the United States of America, designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. THEREFORE, I James B. Hovland, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Edina do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK and urge all citizens to study the Constitution, reflect on the privilege of being an Americanwith all the rights and responsibilities that privilege involves and reaffirm the ideals the Framers of the Constitution had in 1787. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set by hand and caused the Seal of the City of Edina to be affixed this 16th day of September in the year of our Lord two thousand fifteen. James B. Hovland, Mayor 40 • 0 PROCLAMATION CONSTITUTION WEEK WHEREAS, it is the privilege of all Americans to commemorate the two hundred twenty-eighth anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to officially recognize this magnificent document and the anniversary of its creation; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuance of a proclamation by the President of the United States of America, designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. THEREFORE, I James B. Hovland, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Edina do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK and urge all citizens to study the Constitution, reflect on the privilege of being an American with all the rights and responsibilities that privilege involves and reaffirm the ideals of the Constitution. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set by hand and caused the Seal of the City of Edina to be affixed this 16th day of September in the year of our Lord two thousand fifteen. James B. Hovland, Mayor • 0 To: Mayor and Council From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Date: Sept. 16, 2015 Subject: "Speak Up, Edina" Report lc4n,rvl Agenda Item #: V. B. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information M Action Requested: Receive report on August 2015 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion about interactions with elected city officials. Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014-2015 is Communication and Engagement: "To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUpEdina.org. In August 2015, the discussion topic centered on residents' interactions with elected city officials. Edina's elected officials make decisions based on staff recommendations and on resident feedback. Their goal is to represent the residents of Edina. In order to understand community sentiment, they often rely on feedback they receive from the community. The Mayor and City Council interact with the public through "Community Comment" and public hearings during meetings; other public meetings, open houses and events; "Walk with the Mayor" events; written communications, including letters and emails; www.SpeakUpEdina.org; and others. In this discussion, the City posed the following questions: • Do you contact your elected city officials? If so, how often? • How do you prefer to interact or express your opinions to elected city officials? • What other opportunities would you like to see to be able to interact with the City Council? The discussion was open for comments between July 30 and Sept. 7. During that time, 41 comments were made. Additionally, 808 users visited the site 1,084 times, garnering 4,081 page views. All but one commenters in this discussion were from Edina. Attached are the comments for the discussion. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Interaction with Elected City Officials Closed Sep 05, 2015 • Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies • 13 Votes 18 3 41 5 13 PARTICIPANTS TOPICS ANSWERS REPLIES VOTES SUMMARY OF TOPICS INTERACTION METHODS �9 8 Answers • 0 Replies How do you prefer to interact or express your opinions to elected city officials? Joel Stegner - Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) - Aug 04, 2015 5:23 pm i3 0 Votes In writing or in one on one or special feedback meetings. I cannot attend Council meetings, as they are so long and I have another commitment on their meetings. I also never pass up the opportunity to participate in focus groups, surveys, planning meetings and Speak Up Edina, all of which I think are under promoted and utilized. I also communicate with staff when I hope to influence how they are approaching certain key topics such as Grandview. I have found staff very receptive to this. It works better than Communicating just to the Council and hope my ideas are forwarded to staff. Ted Adams • Citizen • (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 08, 2015 2:05 pm izJ 2 Votes I would like to be able to write to the city council via email, particularly in response to a request (via email) for comments on whatever is the current issue. Barbara La Valleur • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) • Aug 25, 2015 3:08 pm i3 0 Votes It depends upon the issue. If I need a response in writing, I'll email. If it's to express an opinion, I've found a personal (phone or in person) conversation valuable and I also use text and voice mail. Cindy Perusse • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55436) • Aug 27, 2015 12:38 pm i:� 0 Votes I usually prefer my first contact to be by email. My approach is similar to Barbara's 0 1 of 9 Full Report • Interaction with Elected City Officials Closed Sep 05, 2015 • Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies • 13 Votes Hope Melton • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55424) • Aug 27, 2015 1:09 pm rz? 0 Votes What type of contact I use depends on the issue involved and whether or not there is a public participation process. Contact with individual council members via email or phone is important, but public interaction, such as within a town meeting, is also essential. stephanie mullaney • Citizen (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 31, 2015 9:58 am 6 0 Votes I prefer emails, but I would hope when I send items to be included in packets, there would be follow up discussions pursued. I did not find that to be the case. There needs to be REAL public meetings, where the public is invited to attend and to truly discuss what is on their minds, with all the council members attending. It feels like to me, that there is very little opportunity for a regular of citizen to be able to speak about items that are current. There are rules about what you can talk about at council meetings, rules about how many council members can be at meetings, etc. We have not had a public hearing on Grandview for 3 years. I would like to see a TRUE open communication venue available. Chris Bremer • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55410) • Aug 31, 2015 12:43 pm i:� 0 Votes • I prefer face-to-face conversations, as I feel I learn more that way. Once I've met a council member, email can be a good vehicle for continuing a conversation. Public meetings are a good thing, but it is hard to tell which points were really taken in by council members. Sometimes I have wondered whether a particular meeting is really about gathering input or more about creating buy -in (not always a bright line, I know). Also, sometimes these meetings seem overly structured with too little time for discussion. Jim Stromberg • Citizen • (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 31, 2015 7:46 pm i3 0 Votes I think I like email the best, as it allows me to clearly state what I wish to convey. It also provides me and the entity I'm writing to a "hard -copy" of the topic I'm addressing. However, I DO feel that attending a meeting (Council or Commission) and voicing my concern or point of view, is important, as it lets those folks know that I care enough to be present at their meeting(s) to address those concerns. OTHER OPPORTUNITIES QQ 13 Answers • 1 Replies What other opportunities would you like to see to be able to interact with the City Council? Joel Stegner • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) • Aug 04, 2015 5:26 pm r!' 0 Votes • Kevin S. has been willing to meet for coffee to discuss ideas. I hope that other Council 2 of 9 Full Report Interaction with Elected City Officials Closed Sep 05, 2015 • Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies • 13 Votes • members are willing to do this occasionally - I had the temerity to ask - not everyone would. Donna Callender - Citizen • (Postal Code: 55436) • Aug 11, 2015 7:02 am i:!� 1 Votes Dunk tank, anyone? At least it would get their attention. Barbara La Valleur • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) - Aug 25, 2015 3:12 pm i�l 2 Votes One possibility is during City Council meetings, for the Council structure to be more flexible to change the agenda order. I've attended numerous meetings where a large number of people are attending for an item that doesn't get addressed until after 10 p.m. or even later .... even after midnight! It seems to me that there sould be a way for a change of order in the agenda to bring those items to the beginning of the evening. Barbara La Valleur - Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) • Aug 25, 2015 3:12 pm i:� 0 Votes should Barbara La Valleur • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) • Aug 25, 2015 3:13 pm • 6 1 Votes also perhaps an "edit" button for this venue when you see you've made a typoO Response: Jordan Gilgenbach • Admin • (Postal Code: 55424) • Aug 26, 2015 4:39 pm Thanks for your comment, Barbara! I'll let our vendor know of this. Barbara La Valleur • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) • Aug 26, 2015 5:30 pm 6 0 Votes Thanks, Jordan! David Frenkel • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55424) • Aug 27, 2015 9:42 am i3 0 Votes This forum gets very few responses. I would suggest trying another method of getting feedback from residents such as more town hall forums. The mayor, city council and staff hold very few public meetings in the community out of city hall. • 3 of 9 Full Report • Interaction with Elected City Officials Closed Sep 05, 2015 • Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies • 13 Votes Hope Melton • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55424) • Aug 27, 2015 1:24 pm i:� 3 Votes I agree with David. Why is this discussion being held during high vacation season? I also agree that we need more public forums. I don't think the issue is whether or not we need more types of opportunities for interaction. The issue is whether the Council uses the venues we have --both individual contact and public interaction --with integrity. If the information gathered from public venues is ignored, as when 4-5 people having private conversations with a council member on a given topic is given equal or higher weight, when the council member votes, than the response of hundreds via surveys or public venues, something is wrong with the system. Now I understand that the majority is not always right, and there are times when an elected official must follow their conscience and good judgment when making a decision to vote for or against an issue of public policy. But their reasons for doing so should be clearly and publicly stated. Hope Melton • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55424) • Aug 27, 2015 4:06 pm i�? 1 Votes These are all helpful questions but they assume one-to-one contact between an is individual and their council member(s). These are private interactions regarding public issues. What's missing is the essence of democracy. That is publicly held debate and discussion. Democracy and civil society is built upon relationships of trust, respect, reciprocity and responsibility --or accountability --that are developed over time. The public dimension is when we come together to reason and debate policy issues that, ultimately, affect us all as a community of individuals. Individual contact is essential, but it's less than half the story. stephanie mullaney • Citizen • (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 31, 2015 10:06 am t:� 2 Votes I agree about the order of the city council meetings. Also, the inability to talk about anything currently being worked on is not helpful. As I said in the other issue post, there needs to be TRUE communication between the city and the people. What I have gleaned from the Grandview process is that "public input" meetings are not for public input. Then, when a few people get deeply involved in an issue, the council believes that, though they truly represent the MAJORITY of the public with respect to city -run survey numbers, that the Council believe they are just a small very vocal group that don't represent public opinion. I have taken away from this process that since the Council reps are elected officials, that they have the power to make the decisions because they were elected. The city asks for input, but public input is NOT used in their decision making. If the Grandview process represents the public process, the process is sorely lacking. It 4 of 9 Full Report Interaction with Elected City Officials • Closed Sep 05, 2015 • Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies • 13 Votes has certainly left a bad impression on me as a citizen that tried to get involved in a community effort, but felt very little impact. Chris Bremer - Citizen • (Postal Code: 55410) • Aug 31, 2015 1:01 pm 0 1 Votes Public meetings are very important but sometimes they are too big for real conversation. I wonder if it might be worth trying to have multiple rooms available, each with a facilitator and a city council member (and maybe a city staff member, depending on the topic), for more focus -group type discussions. The the results from the multiple groups could be looked at together for similarities and differences. I think one could have more confidence in the outcome of such discussions if similar results came out of multiple conversations. Jim Stromberg • Citizen • (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 31, 2015 8:00 pm i:!� 0 Votes Truly a difficult item to discuss. I have always felt that decision -makers making decisions based on feedback from a very small segment of the population they serve is problematic. Do twenty vocal individuals with a certain point of view reflect the feelings of a majority? No one knows. And, the difficulty, of course, is that in responding to the twenty, how do you possibly know if you're talking to twenty or a thousand? I don't envy Council or Commission in seeking information from those they represent - it's troublesome to move in one direction, not knowing if it is the correct direction. So ... asking for info is important. Having the most tools available to your public to utilize in contacting you is also important. THEN... please recognize that a couple dozen citizens saying one thing may not represent what another thousand might feel. And this forum of "Speak -Up" has such a low participation rate, that trying to glean useful direction might be folly. CONTACT & 20 Answers • 4 Replies Do you contact your elected city officials? If so, how often? Joel Stegner • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) • Aug 04, 2015 5:16 pm 6 0 Votes I am on a commission, so .I regularly review Council agenda and minutes, fairly often providing written feedback - rather than attending long council meetings. I also get member Staunton's newsletter and have meetings with him. Joan McMillan - Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) • Aug 06, 2015 5:01 pm i3 1 Votes I recently e-mailed all council members and the mayor concerning the huge earth moving trucks and dump trucks parading by on 76th street all day long. A constant parade which forced me to leave my home for days on end as the noise was horrible --two very large heavy noisy trucks at a time every 10 to 15 minutes! The only response I received was from the Edina Safety Commissioner who related to me that 5 of 9 Full Report C J . Interaction with Elected City Officials Closed Sep 05, 2015 • Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies • 13 Votes Edina had numerous multi-million dollar projects happening in this end of town and that was that. The intersection of 76th and Edinborough Way crosses to the Centennial Lakes park and many of the owners of the 392 units here like to cross the street to enjoy the park and I pointed out that the children from the Edinborough Day Care cross this intersection as well --numbering about 15-20 little people with their caregivers. This did not impress our safety commissioner as these were "multi-million" dollar projects --most of them apposed by the residents. If the city builds condos across the street from a park --please relocate the truck lanes. I think this must be the most crossed intersection in all of Edina. And no one from the city council nor the mayor responded. To be fair --the mayor is normally more responsive than this. Response: David Frenkel , Citizen • (Postal Code: 55424) - Aug 06, 2015 10:52 pm Who is the Edina Safety Commissioner? Lisa Nelson • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55436) • Aug 06, 2015 7:55 pm i:� 4 Votes I was disappointed to hear that when the Park Board wanted to discuss Grandview, they were told by the City Manager/City Council not to. I understand that these boards are only advisory, but I don't believe that anyone should be limiting the discussions by them. The members are frequently more knowledgeable in their area of expertise and have different networks which can bring other information and opinions in to discussions. • Although I think email, voicemail, speak up and community forums are valuable, my sense is that there is an "inner circle" whose voices predominate over all of those. • Lisa Nelson • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55436) • Aug 06, 2015 8:15 pm 6 3 Votes I have not been active in the Grandview discussions, but I did attend two of the open houses. I don't think there was an opportunity to talk to council members at the Community Center, but there was at the Senior Center open house. I did approach two members, both of whom didn't welcome my questions and seemed exasperated that they had to listen because they felt they had all the input they needed and had already made their decision. They bordered on hostile and, based on that experience, I am not eager to approach council members. I don't think they respect their constituents' opinions, but rather those of the staff. While staff may have a lot of information, it is what residents VALUE that should govern decisions. Response: Donna Callender • Citizen - (Postal Code: 55436) • Aug 11, 2015 7:00 am I was also at the Senior Center Grandview open house, and you're absolutely right. The entire thing was structured to discourage questions and comments. Two of the organizers were even a little giggly as they conspired ahead of time about using applause for each other to end questions, just in case anyone tried to start an unauthorized discussion. (Note to the Council: If you're going to sabotage your own process, look around and make sure there aren't any citizens within earshot.) 6 of 9 Full Report Interaction with Elected City Officials • Closed Sep 05, 2015 Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies • 13 Votes Marlys Grantwit Citizen • (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 07, 2015 6:30 am i� 0 Votes comment ... I like "Walk with Mayor" because I can discuss an issue easily with him. Otherwise I call the City Hall and talk to the correct staff member or write a letter. That is sufficient for me. Andrew Brown • Citizen • (Postal Code: 67204) • Aug 11, 2015 7:09 pm i::� 0 Votes think the Mayor & the City Council try to do their best. Even though I can be very heavy handed in my communication & completely disagree with some of their decisions they have always treated me with respect. I have gradually learned about the many pulling forces the City leadership face between Hyper active developers, demands for services, & the influence of the Met Council & State policies. They get pulled in many directions, I hope they can somehow focus on core issues, transportation, density & keeping Edina great and connected to the state and the region and I think they worry about that too. I'm concerned about the liquor business, because of the new external market forces that have changed the business but I think Bob Stewart can help guide with his business experience there. The Mayor & Council care about Edina & I respect and appreciate that. Barbara La Valleur • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55435) • Aug 25, 2015 3:06 pm i:!� 0 Votes My experience over the past 10+ years living in Edina has been very positive in terms of • communicating with and hearing back from City Officials whether it's Mayor Hovland, City Council members or city staff. Whether it's a call, text, email or one-on-one conversation, my questions are always answered and I tip my hats off to all of them and thank them for their service. On another note, I live at 76th & Edinborough Way and while we have experienced heavy truck traffic the past couple of months, I'm thrilled that Minnesota Drive and now Edinborough Way are receiving new surfaces. I'll happily put up with a few weeks of noise to have a smooth driving surface for years to come! Hope Melton • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55424) • Aug 27, 2015 10:25 am izJ 0 Votes I have frequently interacted with elected officials regarding the Name Your Neighborhood, Valley View/Wooddale, and Grandview projects. I've mostly talked with Council members directly, usually at scheduled events, or corresponded through email. While the first two projects were successful by any measure --Grandview was bungled from the onset. For a project of its size and importance, there should be widespread, open, and comprehensive public discussion. Not only did that never occur, the public input data from several meetings and city-wide surveys was consistently ignored. There were multiple advisory committees involved, but every time they leaned towards the creation of a 21st century community center, they were abandoned and reconstituted. These are simply two examples from many (also cited in other's comments above) that left the impression that somewhere along the line, a back room deal was done for private development of the site. That is unacceptable. is 7 of 9 Full Report • Interaction with Elected City Officials Closed Sep 05, 2015 • Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies - 13 Votes Cindy Perusse • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55436) • Aug 27, 2015 12:32 pm r3 0 Votes I have contacted city officials twice during the discussion about naming neighborhoods and when I had a question about placing a neighborhood entry sign. I went to the meetings and stopped into city hall to speak to someone in person. I don't regularly contact city officials though. If I had a particular concern I would probably just email them first. stephanie mullaney • Citizen - (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 31, 2015 9:55 am 6 0 Votes Since I became involved in the Grandview issue, i have been in contact with the city council and city officials on a regular basis. Mostly through emails at least once a month, abd occasional meetings with council members. Attended the Grandview public meetings, but they were hardly a venue for any type of two way discussion. Chris Bremer • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55410) • Aug 31, 2015 12:28 pm rz? 0 Votes • In the past two years I have become engaged in the work of our neighborhood association and as a result I have contacted one or more city council members almost monthly about items of specific interest to our neighborhood. These interactions have all been positive and informative. 40 Lois Ring • Citizen • (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 31, 2015 12:53 pm 6 0 Votes Occasional contact. I have had the best feedback from Bob Stewart. Negative response from Ann Swenson - almost get the feeling she does not care to hear my point of view. Marilyn Listvan • Citizen • (Postal Code: 55436) - Aug 31, 2015 2:54 pm c: 0 Votes limited to no contact --- except for "voting" down sidewalks on our street -curbing project I am frustrated that there seems to be no motivation to limit the "Mc -Mansion" developments in Edina --- keeping lower cost housing or a balance of housing cost ranges does not seem to be part of the political philosophy --- and I recognize that more expensive homes reap more tax dollar$ for the city,yet it almost seems like a conflict of interest that city officials willy-nilly approve any property expansion. without taking into account some balance (e.g. how can younger families afford to move into a community if only "Mc -mansions" are available ----or if developers scoop up older homes as tear -downs before they are even on the market) 8 of 9 Full Report Interaction with Elected City Officials Closed Sep 05, 2015 • Discussion • 18 Participants • 3 Topics • 41 Answers • 5 Replies • 13 Votes • Laura Lehmann • Citizen - (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 31, 2015 6:19 pm 10 0 Votes I have lived in Edina for 23 years. A few issues have been addressed promptly (e.g., sod killed by street construction). Most others were either quite prolonged (months for permission for a 3 -inch change to setback from street when remodeling garage - had to meet with inspector, get permission of neighbors in 1000 -foot radius, attend variance meeting and say why it was necessary) or ignored (had neighbor who built McMansion with hideous cement wall facing outward - I advised city of his disregard of sate statute/city ordinance for best side of fence facing outward and was told I should have brought it to their attention when the wall was being built so they could send an inspector!) I waited over 5 hours to testify at a city council meeting, and was given 2 minutes to ask that Edina adopt a resolution of support for the usual referendum process in the question of a sales tax to build the Twins Ballpark (and not support a referendum waiver). I pay a lot of taxes, but don't feel especially heard by the entity that collects them. Laura Lehmann • Citizen • (Postal Code: unknown) • Aug 31, 2015 6:25 pm r!S 0 Votes As an addendum to above, I attended the neighborhood meeting held for input to the re -do of W 70th Street, and one regarding the development of the area behind Byerly's. I felt our suggestions fell on deaf ears. It seemed the city already had a plan, and meant to stick to it. Jim Stromberg • Citizen - (Postal Code: unknown) - Aug 31, 2015 7:40 pm • i:�? 0 Votes I do write to the Council or Planning Commission when an issue comes to my attention that I wish to address. I have also attended both Council and Commission meetings to voice my thoughts on issues being considered or discussed at those meetings. I would guess that I have made contact about a half dozen times over the last two years. • 9 of 9 Full Report To: Mayor and Council From: Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Date: September 16, 2015 Subject: City Code Update — Health Division Ow (' • ,�CORPOitl`�£O • less Agenda Item #: VII. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Adopt ordinance number 2015-18 amending Chapters 2, 10, 20, and 23 of the Edina City Code. Information / Background: The Health Division is proposing the attached changes to several City Code sections to update terminology and address an issue not previously considered by City Code. A summary of the changes is below: - Clarify the requirements for discharging water from a salt water chlorine generating pool in the City. Water shall not be discharged onto the ground or into the City storm sewer system. - Update section of City pool code regarding handhold requirements for residential swimming pools. Change will allow the Sanitarian, with guidance from other staff, to evaluate proposed handholds and accept alternate proposals that meet the intent of the code. - Remove section of code requiring safety rope and anchors in residential pools. Update licensing categories for food, pool, and lodging facilities to be consistent with other local agencies and the Minnesota Department of Health. New terminology will simplify licensing process and license categories will be more accurate for seasonal and temporary food licenses. - Update City fee schedule to reflect terminology changes and some fee calculation adjustments. Changes will simplify fee calculation process for owners/operators/contractors applying for food, pool, lodging and other Health Division licenses. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-18 • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 2, 10, 20 AND 23 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following amendments are made to Code Section 2-724 Schedule A are: Chapter and Section Purpose of Fee/Charge Amount Chapter 6 6-94 Machine or amusement device license I $1-5 89 , plus - $15.00 Per machine Chapter 10 10-513(d) Public eF semipubl+Fswimming pool license $470.00 Per year for each enclosed pool (partial or all of the year) License $340.00 Per year for each outdoor pool Public eF semipublic—whi rl pool bath or therapeutic swimming pool license $170.00 Per year for each bath or pool Chapter 20 20-277 Food establishment $620.00 High risk food $380.00 Medium risk food $110.00 Low risk food $155.00 Base fee $55.G01150.00 Beer e sep,4eeSeasonal temporary food stand 150.00 Seasonal permanent food stand $139:89 2$ OO.00A;ea4ak—f3a-r- p Mobile food unit $138.00 Food vehicle $155.00 Additional facility $200.00 Pushcart $120.00 Itinerant - Special event food stand $15.00 Food vending machine Restaurant plan review fee $+39 99 150% of license fee Restaurant plan review fee for remodel 100% of license fee Minimum restaurant plan review fee $125.00 20-386 ! =ag:iig establish:McntHotel or motel $9.00 Per room $4�0 Boarding heuse —establishment ora+id lodging establishment4ietfse license $110.00 20-394 $48.00 Per single tr-aEt ef land (may Eentain mere than ene building under- safne ewflers h ip} Multiple dwelling parking garage license $815:00 1$ 00.00 Per garage Section 2. The following Sections of Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code are amended to read as follows: 10-487 (5) f 182850v1 is • • Handholds. Handholds shall be provided around the entire periphery of the pool. When bull -nosed coping is used it shall be and eensist ef a bull nesed Eeping not over two and one-half inches thick for the outer two inches or an equivalent approved handhold. The handhold shall not be more than nine inches above the normal water line and shall extend aFeUnd the entire ..,,..:..beet of the peel. The Sanitarian may approve equivalent designs during the plan review process. 10-487 (12) b. Drainage. If the pool cannot be drained by gravity, it shall be equipped with valves and pumps for completely emptying the pool. The discharge of the pool water to the sanitary sewer, or other suitable disposal unit acceptable to the sanitarian, shall be at a rate not to exceed 250 gallons per minute. No direct connection shall be made to the sanitary sewer. The outlet from the pool recirculation system shall terminate at least six inches above the receptacle connected to the sewer. The dFainage system Water drained from the pool shall not be discharged to the sanitary sewer system during periods of rainstorms. Discharge from salt water chlorine generating pools must be directed to the sanitary sewer. 10-487(18) SafeV repe and aneheFs. A safety repe and ancheFs shall be pre-viA-ed- at the wateF line when the designed peel eperating water leyel is feurand- ene half feet er- less. Section 3. The following Sections of Chapter 20 of the Edina City Code are amended to read as follows: 20-289 - Required i(a) No person shall operate a food establishment or operate any of the following types of enterprises within the city without first obtaining a license of the applicable type described in this section, pursuant to this division: (1) Low risk food establishment. (2) Medium risk food establishment. (3) High risk food establishment. (4) Special Event Food Stand. (5) Feed -.hide. Seasonal Permanent Food Stand. (6) Food vending machine. (7) ltine. ant feed establishment-. Seasonal Temporary Food Stand. (8)) Pushcart food establishment. (9) Mobile Food Unit. (b) An additional fee will be required for the following food establishments: (1) Additional facility. (3) Beer er wine table seFyirze. 20-323 (a) Definitions amended. Minnesota Rules § 4626.0020 are hereby amended by including the following terms and the meanings given them: • Additional facility means a food service or operation which is separate, distinct or unique from the central or main food establishment, as determined by the health authority. 182850v1 Health authority, where used in this section, means a designated member of the city health department. The term "regulatory authority" in the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules ch. 4626, shall mean health authority. Special event food stand, seasonal temporary food stand, seasonal permanent food stand, mobile food unit, Llow risk, medium risk and high risk food establishments, and boarding and lodging establishments Fnean feed establishments as are as defined in Minn. Stats. ch. 157. Pushcart food establishment means any non -self-propelled vehicle limited to serving nonpotentially hazardous foods or commissary -wrapped food maintained at proper temperatures, or limited to the preparation and serving of frankfurters and other precooked ready -to -eat link sausages. Supep4sed group home Fneans a feed establishment WhiEh indudes sleeping fE)F flye eF preyides supeFvisieR feF the beaFdeFs and us registered feF speEial se, vices p., suant rze Minn. Stats. § 157.17, -20-384. - Definitions. • The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Commissioner, as used in Minnesota Rules ch. 4625, means the city. Hotel, lodging establishment and boarding establishment are as defined in Minn. Stats. § 157.15. Lodging means the furnishing for consideration of lodging at a hotel, motel, rooming house, tourist court, or resort, other than the renting or leasing of it for a continuous period of 30 calendar days or more. Operator means a person who provides lodging to others, or any office, agent or employee of such person. 20-385. — License required No person shall operate or engage in the business of operating a hotel, supeFyised gFeup heme, beardingheuse and !edging heuse, lodging establishment or boarding establishment within the city unless a license has been obtained from the city. The applicant for a license shall make application on • forms provided by the city clerk. Lodging establishments will undergo a plan review at the discretion of the sanitarian prior to licensure. The provisions of article II of chapter 12 shall apply to all licenses required by this article and to the holders of such license Section 4. Section 23-95 (3) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: 182850v1 • Wastewater. Discharging any sump pump water, swimming pool water, or water which has been used in a manufacturing process or mechanical process so as to flow upon or over streets, sidewalks, or other public property or private property except that owned by the person discharging the water. Provided, however, swimming pool water, sump pump water and waste water permitted to be discharged into public waters by state law and federal law may be discharged into the city storm sewer system provided that such discharge shall not accumulate so as to become stagnant._ Discharge from salt water chlorine generating pools must be directed to the sanitary sewer. :7 0 Section 5. This ordinance is effective immediately upon passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk 1828500 • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Date: September 16, 2015 Agenda Item #: VII. B. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2015-19 Amending City Code Section 2-724 Schedule A Setting Fees Action Requested: Adopt the attached ordinance, including waiver of second reading. Information / Background: Attached are schedules for fees and charges to be adopted by ordinance proposed to be changed at this time. The changes to Code that are proposed at this time are in bold. Utility fees are proposed as presented in the Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Utility Rate Study prepared by Ehlers & Associates and discussed by the City Council at the July 7, 2015 work session. Representatives from Ehlers will be present for the September 16, 2015 Council meeting to give a presentation on the rate study. The first group of changes proposed at this time are increased charges for new connections to the City's water and sewer system. The increased charges better reflect the costs of building and maintaining infrastructure to meet increased demand for services. This group of changes will be effective October I. The second group of changes proposed at this time are meant to achieve two goals. First, the water, sewer, and storm charges are proposed to increase by 4.75%, 4.5%, and 10%, respectively. The water and sewer increases are primarily to cover increasing costs of rebuilding, maintaining, and improving existing infrastructure. The storm increase is higher than normal this year due to a one-time change to better align of costs for street sweeping into the storm fund from the general fund. The total increase in a sample bill for a residential customer that uses 30 units of water per quarter would be about 5.3%. This group of changes will be effective January I, 2016. 2. Second, staff is proposing to change the billing units from 100 cubic feet to 1,000 gallons. This is a change that was made possible when the new meters were installed because the new meters read in gallons. Currently the gallon usages read by our meters are converted to 100 cubic foot units for billing purposes. Staff believes that most residents will better understand their usage and bills if we convert the billing over to gallons to match the readings from the new meters. A few things to know about this conversion: City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 0 a. We will have new tiers for water. We used to charge the lowest tier rate up to 35 units or 3,500 cubic feet. 3,500 cubic feet equals 26,181.8 gallons. Since it is not practical to set our new tier at that level, we are rounding it to 26,000 gallons even. All of the other tiers have similar rounding. b. We also have new minimums for sewer. Our minimum sewer charge is for 16 units or 1,600 cubic feet. The new level will be 12,000 gallons. c. Morningside rates will also be denominated in gallons. Our Morningside rates are based on Minneapolis rates which we will not receive until December or January, so for now the 2015 rates will be carried forward. We will likely be changing the Morningside rates again in January when we get the new Minneapolis rates. d. The conversion to gallon billings will not affect storm charges or water meter charges. e. The conversion to gallon billings is designed to align the meter readings with billings and improve customer understanding of their usage and the City billing process. The conversion to gallon billings is not designed to increase or decrease overall revenue to the City. However, because of the rounding necessary to make the conversion, individual accounts may have minor impacts during the transition. f. If adopted, the attached ordinance creates two groups of rates that will be effective January I, 2016; one group denominated in 100 cubic foot units and another group denominated in 1,000 gallon units. Staff will transition accounts from cubic foot units to gallons, as schedules and technology permits us to after January 1. We hope to have all accounts converted by . mid -2016 and will plan to adopt rates for 2017 in 1,000 gallon units only. Attachments Ordinance No. 2015-19 Amending Section 2-724 Schedule A Setting Fees Utility Rate Study 0 0 • • REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION ORDINANCE NO. 2015-19 Page 3 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 2-724 are amended to read as follows: Chapter Purpose of Current Fee Proposed Fee and Fee/Charge Section Chapter 28 28-143 Charge for $1,250.00 Water connection charge per $2,000.00 Water connection charge per REC unit quarter (November 1 to March 1) connection to city REC unit X number of SAC X number of SAC units water or sewer units system $625.00 Sewer connection charge per $1,000.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit $57.04 Per quarter to and including 1,600 REC unit X number of SAC X number of SAC units cubic feet units $3.41 Additional from 1,601 cubic Section 2. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 2-724 are amended to read as follows: Chapter Purpose of Current Fee Proposed Fee and Fee/Charge Section Chapter 28 28-43(b) Sewer Service: Based upon water usage during winter Based upon water usage during winter quarter quarter (November 1 to March 1) (November 1 to March 1). City Staff will determine which accounts will be billed in cubic feet and which accounts will be billed in gallons and use the appropriate rates for each. 1. Single-family, $54.58 Per quarter to and including $57.04 Per quarter to and including 1,600 townhouses, two- 1,600 cubic feet cubic feet family dwellings, $3.41 Additional from 1,601 cubic $3.56 Additional from 1,601 cubic feet and apartment buildings containing four or less dwelling units feet and over over $57.00 Per quarter to and including 12,000 gallons $4.75 Per 1,000 gallons used, whichever is greater 2. Apartment building $49.12 Per quarter for each unit over $51.26 Per quarter for each unit over four; or with more than four four; or dwelling units $3.41 Per 100 cubic feet of water $3.56 Per 100 cubic feet of water used, used, whichever is greater I whichever is greater $51.26 Per quarter for each unit over four; or $4.75 Per 1,000 gallons of water used, whichever is greater 3. Commercial and $54.58 Per water meter or approved $57.04 Per water meter or approved sewage industrial buildings, sewage metering device on metering device on premises; or including schools and premises; or churches $3.41 Per 100 cubic feet of water $3.56 Per 100 cubic feet of water used used during the quarter, during the quarter, whichever is whichever is greater greater $57.00 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises; or $4.75 Per 1,000 gallons of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Section 3. The effective date of Section 1 of this Ordinance shall be October 1, 2015. The effective date of Section 2 of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2016. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra Mangen-City Clerk James B. Hovland -Mayor 0 Water Service: City Staff will determine which accounts will be billed in cubic feet and which accounts will be billed in gallons and use the appropriate rates for each. 1. Per 100 cubic feet $1.45 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.52 Up to 3,500 cubic feet for areas of city, except in the $1.93 3,600 to 6,500 cubic feet $2.02 3,600 to 6,500 cubic feet Morningside area $3.02 Over 6,500 cubic feet $3.16 Over 6,500 cubic feet $2.54 Per 100 cubic feet- $2.54 Per 100 cubic feet -Morningside area Morningside area 1. Per 1,000 gallons $2.03 Up to 26,000 gallons for areas of city, except in the $2.69 26,001 to 49,000 gallons Morningside area $4.21 Over 49,000 gallons $3.39 Per 1,000 gallons -Morningside area 2. Domestic accounts $1.45 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.52 Up to 3,500 cubic feet used by commercial and industrial $1.93 Over 3,500 cubic feet $2.02 Over 3,500 cubic feet buildings, including schools and churches $2.03 Up to 26,000 gallons $2.70 Over 26,000 gallons 3. Lawn watering $1.93 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $2.02 Up to 3,500 cubic feet accounts used by commercial and $3.02 Over 3,500 cubic feet $3.16 Over 3,500 cubic feet industrial buildings, including schools and $2.70 Up to 26,000 gallons churches $4.22 Over 26,000 gallons 4. Meter charge $17.69 Per quarter for up to 3/4 -inch $18.53 Per quarter for up to 3/4 -inch meter meter $24.12 Per quarter for 1 -inch meter $25.27 Per quarter for 1 -inch meter $27.52 Per quarter for 11/4 -inch $28.83 Per quarter for 11/4 -inch meter meter $30.95 Per quarter for 11/2 -inch $32.42 Per quarter for 11/2 -inch meter meter $49.84 Per quarter for 2 -inch meter $52.21 Per quarter for 2 -inch meter $189.26 Per quarter for 3 -inch meter $198.25 Per quarter for 3 -inch meter $240.90 Per quarter for 4 -inch meter $252.34 Per quarter for 4 -inch meter $305.29 Per quarter for 6 -inch meter $319.79 Per quarter for 6 -inch meter $387.70 Per quarter for 8 -inch meter $406.12 Per quarter for 8 -inch meter 28-208 Stormwater drainage $24.26 Per quarter pursuant to $26.68 Per quarter pursuant to formula in 28-209 charge formula in section 28-208 section 28-208 Section 3. The effective date of Section 1 of this Ordinance shall be October 1, 2015. The effective date of Section 2 of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2016. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra Mangen-City Clerk James B. Hovland -Mayor 0 • • EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE September, 2015 Water, Sanitary and Storm Sewer Utility Rate Study � Prepared By: City Staff o, le And pn"'i Ehlers SAlI:a ; � J111 J41 —1-800-552-1171 1 mvw.ehlers-inc.com • Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................1 GOALS OF THE UTILITY RATE STUDY.......................................................................3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................................................................3 WATERUTILITY...........................................................................................5 SEWERSYSTEM.........................................................................................................11 MEASURES OF FINANCIAL STRENGTH...................................................................14 WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION FEES...............................................................14 STORM SEWER SYSTEM...........................................................................................15 • THEUTILITY BILL........................................................................................18 UTILITY BILL COMPARISON.........................................................................19 RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................. 20 Water Utility Projections.....................................................................Appendix A Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections.........................................................Appendix B Storm Water Utility Projections............................................................Appendix C Capital Improvement Plan for Water .....................................................Appendix D Capital Improvement Plan for Sanitary Sewer.........................................Appendix E Capital Improvement Plan for Storm Sewer.................................................Appendix F Proposed Rates...............................................................................Appendix G U • is Executive Summary The goal of a rate study is to ensure the long-term financial health of the utility enterprise funds. The last rate study was completed two years ago in the fall of 2013. This current update was prompted by increases in the amount of projected growth and revisions to the City's Capital Improvement Plan. Key Findings • The City of Edina's utility funds are in good financial health, and, in fact, the financial stability of the utilities contributes to the City's AAA and AAa bond ratings from Standard and Poor's and Moody's, respectively. • Recommended water rate increase is 4.75% annually beginning in 2016. Anticipated growth helps reduce the annual rate increase. (The prior rate study recommendation was 5.25% per year.) No changes to the water rate structure are proposed. • The City Of Edina has been reinvesting in its utility systems through street and utility reconstruction, projects and storm water improvements. Specifically, the City has committed to replacing aging utility pipes undermost street reconstruction projects. These ongoing and future improvements put pressure on sanitary and storm sewer rates. • There is approximately $100,000 of storm sewer related operating expense currently being paid from the City's General Fund. This rate study assumes that those expenses will be moved to the storm sewer fund, and will be paid for with storm sewer revenues. • The City currently uses a combination of pay-as-you-go and bond financing for its capital needs. We expect that debt will continue to be necessary to support the capital improvements for the water and storm sewer systems. Approximately 70% of the water projects, 45% of sanitary sewer projects and 75% of storm sewer projects will be financed with bonds over the next ten years. • The City will begin converting water and sewer bills from cubic feet to gallons over the course of the next year. Therefore, this report provides 2016 utility rates in both units of measurement. The rate increases recommended in this report are not related to the conversion. After a property's bill has been converted, the customer will pay the same amount (within pennies) of what they paid prior to the conversion. • The City intends to update the rate study every four to five years, unless changes to capital spending or growth necessitate an earlier revision. Therefore, we are recommending that the City Council adopt rate increases for the five year period of 2016-2020. Utility Rate Study Page 1 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • 2016 Recommendations Adopt the annual rate changes proposed for 2016 through 2020 • 4.75% increase per year to water rates • 4.5% increase per year to sanitary sewer rates • 10% increase in 2016 to storm sewer rates, followed by 6.5% increase per year from 2017 through 2020. • Increase Water Access Charge (WAC) to $2,000 per unit and Sewer Access Charge (SAC) to $1,000 per unit effective October 1, 2015, followed by 7% annual increases to the fee. • LJ Utility Rate Study Page 2 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • Goals of the Utility Rate Study The City of Edina requested that Ehlers update the rate study of its water, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer system utilities. Ehlers last completed a full rate study in 2013. The purpose of this update is to determine how rates will need to be adjusted for 2016 through 2020 to keep the utilities financially self-sufficient. The recommended rates are designed to accomplish the following: 1. Rates are sufficient to pay the ongoing operations and capital improvements, and to maintain adequate cash balances. 2. The rate structure distributes the costs of operating the system across utility users consistent with the policy objectives of the Council. Background Information Enterprise Funds Most City operations, such as public works, public safety, administration and parks, are accounted for under governmental funds, primarily embedded in the General Fund. These operations usually depend on a variety of revenues including property taxes, intergovernmental aid, and charges for services. Municipal utility funds are considered "enterprise funds." They are intended to be operated as a private enterprise in which the fee revenue pays for all operations. City operations include three utility funds: water, sewer, and storm sewer. In the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), enterprise funds are segregated funds, recognizing the unique purpose and revenue streams of these City functions. In addition to the CAFR segregating the enterprise funds, the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) distinguishes between projects that will be funded by the enterprise funds and those to be funded by general governmental funds. It should be noted that the City currently has one accounting fund for water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and recycling. For this analysis, we segregated the revenues and expenses for each utility, and treated each as a separate fund. By doing so, we can ensure that each utility will "pay its own way." For purposes of this study, we refer to each segregated utility as its own fund. Street Reconstruction Policy Street reconstruction projects provide and opportunity for the City to strategically address its utility infrastructure needs. Recently, the City staff and Council decided to be more pro -active in replacing aging utility pipes and other infrastructure under street reconstruction projects. • This led to changes in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) which affect the revenue demands on the utility funds. The following chart shows the change in the CIP for water line Utility Rate Study Page 3 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 replacements in connection with street reconstruction projects between the last rate study completed in 2013 and this current study. Average Annual Capital Improvements for Street Reconstruction Projects Assumed in Rate Study Water $2.3 million Sanitary Sewer $1.4 million Storm Sewer $2.4 million $2.0 million -13% $2.5 million 80% $3.2 million 33% Costs of improvements are inflated 4% per year beginning in 2016. Future capital costs include a water treatment plant constructed in 2017-2018. A summary of the CIP can be found in Appendices D -F. Revenues from Growth Help Offset Costs The rate study reflects the development of multi -family residential buildings in the Southdale area. It assumes 240 new housing units will be constructed each year for the next three years (2016 through 2018) and 30 units per year thereafter. To be conservative, there is no growth assumed from new commercial or institutional customers. Growth Assumptions 2016-2018 240 units per year 2019 and beyond 30 units per year The growth is assumed for estimating future water connection fees, and is projected to generate almost $2.2 million over the next ten years. In addition, we included user revenues from the new units in the analysis. Within five years, the City will receive over $100,000 per year in water revenues and over $50,000 in sanitary sewer revenues from its newest customers. This revenue from growth moderate future water rate increases. Utility Rate Study Page 4 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • PJ • Water Utility Fund Water Rate Structure There are three components to the City's water utility revenues: • Fixed Charges • Usage Fees • WAC Fees (Water Access Fees or hook-up charges) 1) Fixed Charges are a fixed quarterly fee based on the property type and number of units. The fixed charge is established to recover certain administration expenses, such meter reading and billing, plus a portion of distribution costs. The 2015 fixed charge for single family residential accounts is $17.69 per quarter and it increases as the size of the meter increases. This fixed charge raises approximately $1.2 million per year. 2) Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water. Water is sold in "units" and currently one unit represents 100 cubic feet. With the new water meters, the City will convert to selling water by the gallon, and one unit will equal 1,000 gallons of water. For the sake of consistency, this report provides information based on cubic feet. The billing structure for most Edina residents is tiered so that the rate per unit depends on the • amount of water used per quarter. The first tier of usage is up to 3,500 cubic feet. The second tier is for usage over 3,500 cubic feet and up to 6,500 cubic feet, and the third tier is for water usage over 6,500 cubic feet per quarter. All types of property are included in the tiering of rates, although at different levels. The prior rate study called for annual water rate increases of 5.25%. We now forecast that, due to growth and a small decrease in planned capital spending, annual rate increases of 4.75% will be needed. The 2015 and proposed future rates for each tier are listed in the chart below. Usage Actual' Proposed Gallons 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Tier 1 Rate Increase 5.25% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 0-35 units $1.45 $1.52 $1.59 $1.67 $1.75 $1.83 Tier 2 Rate Increase 5.25% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 36-65 units $1.93 $2.02 $2.12 $2.22 $2.32 $2.43 Tier 3 Rate Increase 5.25% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% > 65 units $3.02 $3.16 $3.31 $3.47 $3.64 $3.81 Morningside 0-35 units ! Future Morningside increases are dependent on the rate 36-65 units increases underthe Cityof Minneapolis contract > 65 units ; 5.25% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Page 5 September, 2015 No changes to the tiered water rate structure are being proposed. Water usage in the Morningside area is charged at a flat rate per unit. The Morningside rate is set at an amount sufficient to cover the cost of purchasing water from the City of Minneapolis, plus; a pro -rata share of the City of Edina's water distribution costs not included in the fixed charge; and a capital cost allocation for improvements anticipated in the Morningside area. The largest component of the Morningside water rate is the cost of water from the City of Minneapolis. Morningside customers receive softened water, unlike the water pumped and distributed by the City of Edina. 3) Water Access Charges (WAC) are paid by developers of new homes and businesses when a building permit is pulled. Developers do.not pay connection fees when they are replacing an existing unit, as is the case for residential tear downs and rebuilds. These connection fees help pay for the capital costs of serving the new properties. The City of Edina currently charges $1,250 per residential equivalency unit for new development. We recommend that the City increase its WAC fee to $2,000 in 2016 as discussed later in this report. Water Consumption A significant assumption in the rate study is the amount of water used. Water demand, and thus revenue, varies with weather patterns. The following graph shows variation in water usage since 2003. The increased water consumption in 2012 reflects a dry year that resulted in more irrigation. In addition, the City began replacing its aging water meters in 2012. As water meters age, some will slow down and under -report water consumption. Water Consumption 3,500,000,000 3,000,000,000------------__.�__` 2,500,000,000 2,000,000,000 - Historic Water Pumped 1,500,000,000 Future Water Use Assumed 1,000,000,000 500,000,000 0 ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,�o �o do ,yo ,yo do do Utility Rate Study Page 6 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 CJ • • • • • There is always a discrepancy between water pumped and water billed, referred to as "water loss" and it is related to flushing the system, water main breaks and leaks, and non -billed consumption. This study has assumed future use of approximately 2.175 billion gallons, or 2.9 million units per year (with one unit equal to 100 cubic feet), based on multi-year pumping and billing data. This represents a decrease of 225 million gallons from the prior rate study. Investing in the Water Infrastructure The need to reinvest in the City's aging water system plus the construction of a new water treatment plant will continue to place financial stresses on the water utility fund. The City's recent and projected investment for replacing and improving the water system is significant. Between 2008 and 2014, the City spent almost $33.5 million on capital improvements from the water utility fund. This study incorporates the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan for the utilities, and estimates of future capital costs for 2020 and beyond. The chart below shows that debt and capital costs are expected to continue to grow into the future. Annual Capital Costs, Operating Expenses, and Revenue — Water Fund A�l1 111111 Proposed Water Rates Residential Water Rates Fixed Charges are proposed to increase 4.75% per year in 2016 through 2020, as compared to the previous 5.25% rate increases recommended in the 2013 rate study. Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water for all customers. This study proposes a 4.75% annual rate increase in 2016 through 2020. Usage Fees for Morningside are determined by a formula that adds City of Edina water distribution costs to the cost of softened water purchased from the City of Minneapolis. Edina's portion of the Morningside rate is expected to increase 4.75% annually, which translates into approximately two cents per year. The majority of the usage rate, however, is determined by the cost of water from Minneapolis. In 2015 the Morningside usage fee is $2.45 per unit, which represents a 0% increase over the 2014 water rate. Future rate increases will largely depend on Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Page 7 September, 2015 • the price of water from Minneapolis. Morningside residents and businesses, like those in the rest of Edina, will also pay the fixed quarterly fee which is proposed to increase 4.75% annually beginning in 2016. The chart on page 5 and the rate schedule in Appendix G show the proposed residential water rates. Irrigation/Sprinkler Meters Water consumption used for sprinklers by residential customers is charged at the same rate as regular water usage in the same usage tiers. Water used in sprinklers by commercial customers that have irrigation meters are currently charged the two highest tiers at a rate of $1.93 per unit for 0-35 units per quarter, and $3.02 for each unit over 35 units. The proposed 2016 commercial irrigation water rates are $2.02 and $3.16, respectively. Commercial Customers Non -irrigation usage by commercial customers is charged on the first two tiers. Currently, water consumption of 0-35 units is $1.45 per unit, and all water consumption over 35 units is $1.93 per unit. The proposed 2016 rates are $1.52 and $2.02 respectively. Conversion from Cubic Feet to Gallons • The City will begin converting water and sewer bills from cubic feet to gallons over the course of the next year. For the sake of continuity and comparison, this report generally discusses the proposed rates in units equal to 100 cubic feet. The proposed tiers and rates in 1,000 gallon units is provided in Appendix G. The rates are designed to result in the same charge to the customer. The chart on the next page gives an example of two customer bills and shows that the rate charges in cubic feet and gallons for the same usage results in similar payment amounts. It is important to note that the rate increases recommended in this report are not related to the conversion from cubic feet to gallons. Over time, the City has been able to reduce the projected annual water rate increase. For example, the 2011 rate study projected the need for 6% annual rate increases well into the future. The graph below shows the proposed rates from the last three studies for the Tier 1 water rate. It suggests the next rate study should be completed in four to five years. • Utility Rate Study Page 8 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • 49 0 Sample Bill in Cubic Feet and Gallons 2016 Winter Quarter - 2,000 cubic feet or 15,000 gallons Water $ 30.40 $ 30.45 Sewer $ 71.28 $ 71.25 Storm $ 26.68 $ 26.68 Meter $ 18.53 $ 18.53 Total $ 146.89 $ 146.91 2016 Summer Quarter - 4,400 cubic feet or 33,000 gallons Water $ 71.38 $ 71.68 Sewer $ 71.28 $ 71.25 Storm $ 26.68 $ 26.68 Meter $ 18.53 $ 18.53 Total $ 187.87 $ 188.14 Over time, the City has been able to reduce the projected annual water rate increase. For example, the 2011 rate study projected the need for 6% annual rate increases well into the future. The graph below shows the proposed rates from the last three studies for the Tier 1 water rate. It suggests the next rate study should be completed in four to five years. Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Page 9 September, 2015 • Water Rate Projections in Prior Rate Studies Compared to 2015 Study Prudent Use of Debt for Water Projects In order to maintain a positive cash position and achieve the target cash reserve over the long • term, the City will need to finance the majority of its water system capital improvements in the near term. The projections assume most capital costs will be financed over the next nine years ending in 2019, after which bonds will pay for only a portion of the improvements through 2024. Beginning in 2025, the projections show the fund will be able to pay for capital project costs without issuing debt. Capital projects financed with debt are amortized over a ten-year period and interest rates are estimated based on a spread over current market conditions. By keeping the term of the debt to ten years, the City will be able to: 1) Protect its bond rating; and 2) Allow time after the debt is retired to fund replacement reserves and reduce reliance on debt in the future. The following chart demonstrates how much capital is to be expended and how much debt is to be issued in each year. Utility Rate Study Page 10 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 L Water Capital Expenses and Debt Issues 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ■Capital Expeditures ■Bond Proceeds Sewer System • The Metropolitan Council Influence The City of Edina participates in the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sewer system. This means that the City's sanitary sewer system flows to the MCES treatment plant and the City receives a bill from the MCES for the service. The City does not maintain its own sanitary sewer treatment plant. MCES allocates the cost of the metro area sanitation system to a user city based on the relative percent of that city's flow into the system. The MCES disposal charge is the single biggest expense in the City's. sewer fund and comprises almost 75% of operating expenses, excluding depreciation. The graph below breaks out the sanitary sewer operating expenses. r: Sanitary Sewer Operating Expenses 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 Collection Systems 4,000,000 ■ Administration ■ MCES Charges 2,000,000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Page 11 September, 2015 Currently the MCES charge for service is budgeted at $4,622,800, and is estimated to increase 5% to $4,835,940 in 2015. This study assumes future increases to the MCES charge for service will be 5% per year, consistent with the average increase over the last two years. The second biggest expenditure in the sewer fund is capital purchases, most of which is designated for replacing the sewer mains under road reconstruction projects. In order to provide adequate revenue for these two cost drivers (MCES disposal fees and capital improvements), sewer rates will need to increase 4.5% in 2016 and annually thereafter. In the Council work session the question arose as to how much of this increase is attributable to capital, and how much to MCES fees. If MCES rates remained constant, the City's sewer rate increase would need to be just 1.5% annually to pay for capital and other operating expenses. That is, one-third of the projected 4.5% rate increase is due to increases in the City's capital and operating costs, and two-thirds is related to projected increases in the MCES disposal fees. If MCES rates increase at less than 5%, then the City may moderate its own rate increases. Pro -Forma Analysis Assumptions Sewer Rates City of Edina sewer customers pay a quarterly fixed charge and a flat rate per unit of water. Sewer is billed based on winter water consumption so that residents and businesses are not billed sewer charges on water that is used for irrigation or other outdoor uses. During the winter months, sewer is the biggest part of most customers' utility bill. U 0 The 2015 sewer rate is $3.41 per unit. One unit is 100 cubic feet or approximately 750 gallons. • There is a minimum quarterly fee, regardless of use, of $54.58 (16 units or 1600 cubic feet). Utility Rate Study Page 12 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 Sanitary Sewer Utility Growth and Utility Usage Sewer usage will remain constant except for the addition of new users consistent with the growth assumptions discussed previously. Operating Expenses City expenses increase 3% annually MCES Disposal Expense MCES disposal charges increase 5% annually Capital Expenses Costs of improvements are inflated 4% per year. Future total capital improvements from 2016 to 2025 are estimated at an uninflated value of $23.3M. A summary of the CIP can be found in Appendix F. Rate Structure Residential sewer is billed based on a minium fee that includes 1600 cubic feet plus a per unit usge fee for discharge above 16 units. Sewer usage is based on winter quarter water consumption. No changes to the rate structure are proposed. Sewer Rates City of Edina sewer customers pay a quarterly fixed charge and a flat rate per unit of water. Sewer is billed based on winter water consumption so that residents and businesses are not billed sewer charges on water that is used for irrigation or other outdoor uses. During the winter months, sewer is the biggest part of most customers' utility bill. U 0 The 2015 sewer rate is $3.41 per unit. One unit is 100 cubic feet or approximately 750 gallons. • There is a minimum quarterly fee, regardless of use, of $54.58 (16 units or 1600 cubic feet). Utility Rate Study Page 12 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • The minimum charge helps pay for the fixed costs of the system. As with the water utility, when a customer account is converted from cubic feet to gallons, a different rate schedule will apply. Please see Appendix G for the schedule of sewer rates in both cubic feet and gallons. The per 1,000 gallon rates are established to result in an equivalent payment for the same amount of water used, regardless of the unit of measurement. Proposed 2014 Sewer Rates The projected rate increase for sanitary sewer is 4.5% per year from 2016 through 2020. This compares to a 3.25% rate increase projected in the 2011 rate study. Increases in capital costs and MCES disposal fees contribute to the higher rate increase. We do not recommend changing the rate structure at this time. The proposed rate per unit (1 unit = 100 cubic feet) is in the following chart. The rate applies to all Edina residential and commercial customers. Sanitary Sewer 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Rate per Unit (100 cubic feet) $3.41 $3.56 $3.73 $3.89 $4.07 $4.25 • Prudent Use of Debt for Sewer Projects The proposed sewer rates will be sufficient to pay for over half of the capital projects with cash. The remaining portion is expected to be financed. This is a change from the prior rate study which moved the City away from annual bond issues and projected using cash for all future capital improvements. Because the total cost of 2016-2020 capital projects increased by 80%, we anticipate that financing a portion of the projects will be necessary to maintain adequate cash reserves. Measures of Financial Strength: Water and Sewer Fund Cash Balances The cash balance of a fund is a measure of its financial health. Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue depending on weather, and to fund unexpected repairs and a portion of capital improvements. They also give the City the flexibility to bond for capital improvements in conjunction with other City bonding needs, thereby reducing costs of issuance. Finally, because the cash balance is measured at the end of the calendar year, prior to the February 1 debt payment, the cash balance should include 100% of the upcoming debt service payment. Over the long term, the City's goal is a cash balance equal to 4 months of operating expenses plus the next year's debt service. The following graph shows the projected cash balances as measured against target cash reserves. It can be seen that the proposed rate increases and use of is debt financing should be adequate to achieve the target cash balance. The water and sewer fund is financially stable. Utility Rate Study Page 13 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • Combined Water and Sanitary Sewer Cash Balances 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 ■Target Cash Balance ■ Unrestricted Cash Balance Water and Sewer Connection Fees The Ci of Edina currently charges water and sewer connection fees that total $1,200 per • City Y g residential equivalency unit for new development. These connection fees help pay for the capital costs of serving the new properties. New growth in the Southdale area is requiring investment in additional water treatment and other water and sewer infrastructure. Therefore, we would recommend that the City increase its connections fees as indicated in the chart below. Increases in 2017 and beyond are proposed to be 7% annually. Proposed Connection Fees W- SAC $400 $500 $625 $1,000 $1,070 WAC 800 $1,000 $1,250 $2,000 $2,140 Total $1,200 $1,500 $1,875 $3,000 $3,210 *2016 rates will be effective October 1. 2015 Even with the proposed increases, the City of Edina's connection fees will be competitive. • Utility Rate Study Page 14 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • Comparison of Proposed 2016 Water and Sewer Connection Fees Neighboring communities that do not charge a connection fee include Hopkins, Bloomington, and Richfield. Is The revenue projections in the Appendices assume that connection fees will be collected on 240 residential equivalency units per year in the years 2016 through 2018, . and 30 units per year thereafter. • Storm Sewer System The storm sewer fund was created to pay for the management of storm water runoff in concert with the local watershed. City projects often include repair and maintenance of drainage systems, storm water ponds, and other wetland outlets. Single family residential properties pay a fixed quarterly fee. Commercial property owners are charged based on the amount of impervi6us surface that does not allow rainwater to be absorbed into the ground. Over time, capital costs for the storm water system have increased to meet increasingly stringent state standards intended to improve water quality. In addition, there are storm water related construction costs in connection with street reconstruction projects. Over the next ten years, the City anticipates over $30 million in uninflated capital costs for new storm sewer improvement projects and to replace its aging storm sewer system. The growth in capital needs for road reconstruction and water quality projects is shown in the graph below. Utility Rate Study Page 15 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • Annual Capital Costs, Operating Expenses, and Revenue — Storm Sewer Fund $7,000,000 —----------- $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 o Debt Service and Capital Operating Expenses (excluding Depreciation) Operating Revenues In addition, there are approximately $100,000 of storm sewer operating costs that the General Fund is routinely paying for. These expenses appropriately belong to the storm sewer fund and may be paid for with storm sewer revenues. The advantage of -moving all costs to the storm sewer fund is that tax exempt property would pay its full share of the costs. It also reduces the property tax levy or provides more capacity in the General Fund for other City goals and expenses. Based on discussion with staff and the City Council, this rate study assumes the expenses currently being paid for from the General Fund will be moved to the storm sewer fund. Storm sewer rates will need to be increased to fund the additional operatipg expenses and planned capital projects. Proposed Storm Sewer Rates The City's 2015 quarterly storm sewer rate is $24.26 per quarter. The proposed rate increases in the chart below will allow the City to maintain and improve is storm water infrastructure, as well as sustaining adequate cash reserves. These rates represent a 10% annual rate increase in 2016 followed by 6.5% annual increases in subsequent years. The prior rate study projected 6% annual rate increases. is Utility Rate Study Page 16 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • Quarterly Storm Sewer Rates — Residential 2015 2016 2017 2618 2019 2020 $24.26 $26.68 $28.42 $30.27 $32.23 $34.33 Cities across the state will be facing pressure to generate more revenue to fund storm sewer systems. The Clean Water Legacy Act provided funding to test and develop plans for Minnesota's polluted waterways. These plans may result in new unfunded mandates for local governments. While the future requirements for managing the quality and quantity of storm water are unknown, the level of projected capital expenses in this study should pay for many of the mandated improvements. As more cities undertake planning for storm sewer capital improvements, we expect to see higher storm sewer utility fees across the metro area. Future Debt for Capital Improvements We are projecting the need to finance almost 60% of the anticipated $16.4 million of 2016-2020 proposed capital improvements. (The $16.4 million represents the inflated capital improvement costs.) The bonds are expected to have a 10 year amortization. As cash balances and project costs are evaluated in the future, the amount and term of the debt should be re-evaluated. Storm Sewer Fund Cash Balances IsThe purpose of the cash balance is to allow the City to fund routine improvements on a "pay-as- you-go" basis, reserving the use of debt for major improvements. It is our recommendation that the system be operated to maintain a minimum cash balance equal to four months of operating expenses plus the next year's debt service. The projected cash balances are shown in the following graph. The storm sewer fund is financially stable with the proposed rates. • 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 Storm Sewer Cash Balances o0 o^o o^° o^�' o^�O o^� o^� o^�' 0 oti^ oIV, otio e otic' ti ti 1 ti 1 ti ti ti ti ti ti P ti ti Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Page 17 September, 2015 Putting It All Together: The Utility Bill The chart below shows the total utility bill for sample residents who use varying amounts of water. Because residents view their utilities together in one bill, we have included water, sanitary, and storm water charges, along with a cumulative total. City of Edina Sample Projected Residential Utility Bills Water increasing 4.75%; Sewer increasing 4.50°/x; Storm increasing 10% in 2016 Sample Family Quarterly Bill 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Winter months - 30 units water and sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 122.04 Water 61.19 64.10 67.14 70.33 73.67 Storm Water 24.26 26.68 28.42 30.27 32.23 Total $ 187.79 $ 197.73 $ 207.32 $ 217.38 $ 227.95 Combined Fee Increase $ 7.61 $ 9.94 $ 9.59 $ 10.07 $ 10.56 Percent Increase 4.23% 5.29% 4.85% 4.86% 4.86% Summer months - 50 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 122.04 Water 97.39 102.02 106.86 111.94 117.25 Storm Water 24.26 26.68 28.42 30.27 32.23 Total $ 223.99 $ 235.65 $ 247.04 $ 258.99 $ 271.53 Combined Fee Increase $ 9.45 $ 11.66 $ 11.39 $ 11.95 $ 12.54 Percent Increase 4.40% 5.20% 4.83% 4.84% 4.84% Sample Summer Bill - High Water Use 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 100 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 102.34 106.95 111.76 116.79 122.04 Water 232.04 243.06 254.61 266.70 279.37 Storm Water 24.26 26.68 28.42 30.27 32.23 Total $ 358.64 $ 376.69 $ 394.79 $ 413.76 $ 433.65 Combined Fee Increase $ 16.06 $ 18.05 $ 18.09 $ 18.97 $ 19.89 Percent Increase 4.69% 5.03% 4.80% 4.81% 4.81% Sample Bill for Low Utility User 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 12 units water and sewer Sewer (minimum quarterly rate) 54.58 57.04 59.60 62.29 65.09 Water 35.09 36.76 38.50 40.33 42.25 Storm Water 24.26 26.68 28.42 30.27 32.23 Total $ 113.93 $ 120.48 $ 126.53 $ 132.88 $ 139.57 Combined Fee Increase $ 4.83 $ 6.55 $ 6.05 $ 6.36 $ 6.69 Percent Increase 4.42% 5.75% 5.02% 5.03% 5.03% Sample Quarter) Bill - High Commerc 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 8,300 units water and 8,300 units sewer Sewer 28,314.45 29,588.60 30,920.09 32,311.50 33,765.51 Water 16,002.20 16,762.30 17,558.51 18,392.54 19,266.19 Storm Water 24.26 26.68 28.42 30.27 32.23 Total $ 44,340.91 $ 46,377.59 $ 48,507.02 $ 50,734.31 $ 53,063.94 Combined Fee Increase $ 1,710.46 $ 2,036.68 $ 2,129.43 $ 2,227.28 $ 2,329.63 Percent Increase 4.01% 4.59% 4.59% 4.59% 4.59% Utility Rate Study Page 18 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • • • Utility Bill Comparison There are many factors that determine a City's utility rates including water source, type of water treatment needed, geography and terrain of the community, development patterns, and demographics. Because these differ significantly between communities, one community cannot set their utility rates based on what their neighbors are charging. Nonetheless, it is interesting and helpful to know how the City of Edina compares to surrounding communities because residents and businesses often expect to pay similar rates. The graph below compares the utility bill for a typical single family customer in Edina and its neighbors. $175.00 $150.00 $125.00 $100.00 $75.00 $50.00 $25.00 $0.00 Comparison of Utility Bills For Single Family Customer (Using 27,000 gal water and 13,000 gal sewer per quarter) City of Edina City of Edina City of City of Eden City of City of City of City of St. Proposed 2015 Bloomington Prairie Hopkins Minnetonka Richfield Louis Park 2016 Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota ❑ Water [:]Sewer ❑ Storm Water Page 19 September, 2015 Recommendations The City of Edina has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for improvements through a combination of cash and debt. The need to reinvest in the water, sewer, and storm sewer utility systems over the next several years will put financial pressures on all of the utility funds, particularly the storm sewer fund. The rate study indicates that rate increases are necessary in 2016 through 2020. Steady annual rate increases will be needed for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities to pay for City operating costs and capital improvements. We are also recommending increases in WAC and SAC fees. While this analysis proposes the use of debt to allow for steady and predictable rate increases, it is not a debt plan. The City should review whether it has sufficient cash to pay for capital improvements prior to issuing debt. At its option, the City may accumulate less cash in its utility funds (thereby funding less depreciation) in order to reduce the amount of new debt issued for utility improvements. As with all other bonding decisions, the City's decision to issue debt for any given improvement will be based on many factors, including the City's cash balances, rating, and other financing needs. 2016 Recommendations • Adopt the annual rate changes proposed for 2016 - 2020 ■ 4.75% annual increase per year to water rates ■ 4.5% annual increase per year to sewer rates ■ 10% increase per year to storm sewer rates in 2016 and 6.5% annual increase in storm sewer rates 2017-2020. • Adopt the following sewer connection (SAC) fees effective October 1, 2015: ■ 2015 - $1,000 ■ 2016 and thereafter — 7% annual increase • Adopt the following water connection (WAC) fees: ■ 2015 - $2,000 ■ 2016 and thereafter — 7% annual increase Utility Rate Study Page 20 City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 r'1 U 0 • • Appendices to this report follow: Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota Water Utility Projections Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections Storm Sewer Utility Projections Capital Improvement Plan for Water Capital Improvement Plan for Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Plan for Storm Sewer Proposed Rate Schedule in Cubic Feet and Gallons Page 21 September, 2015 Appendix A Water Utility Projections • • Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 City of Edina 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% Projected 4.75% Utility Funds - Water Fund 3.00% 3.00% Per Financial Statements 3.00% Preliminary Exhibit A 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2012 Usage/fixed rate increase 5.25% 5.25% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% Other revenue increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Expenditure increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Investment Earnings 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% • 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% Projected 4.75% 4.75% 3.00% 3.00% Per Financial Statements 3.00% Preliminary Budget 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 1 Revenues 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 2,265,086 Projected 2,403,030 2,475,121 2 2,625,856 2,704,632 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 3 2025 4 Charges for Water Usage 6,557,701 6,243,432 6,079,993 6,964,643 6,876,545 7,213,944 7,579,054 5 Sale of Water Meters 23,796 30,490 43,893 41,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 6 State Health Fee 88,043 88,059 87,923 115,927 119,405 122,987 126,677 7 Other 241,394 451,523 103,976 136,527 140,623 144,841 149,187 8 9 Total operating revenues 6,910,934 6,813,504 6,315,785 7,258,097 7,167,573 7,512,773 7,885,917 10 11 Expenses 12 13 Admin. 570,903 672,004 610,547 1,239,238 1,276,415 1,314,707 1,354,148 14 Water Distribution 1,378,176 1,606,757 1,634,693 991,661 1,021,411 1,052,053 1,083,615 15 Source of Supply 505,834 608,503 506,194 461,000 474,830 489,075 503,747 16 Water Treatment 552,092 627,819 569,998 486,676 501,276 516,315 531,804 17 Depreciation 1,461,418 1,749,052 2,010,960 2,012,500 2,072,875 2,135,061 2,199,113 18 19 Total operating expense 4,468,423 5,264,136 5,332,392 5,191,075 5,346,807 5,507,211 5,672,427 20 21 Operating income (loss) 2,442,511 1,549,368 983,393 2,067,023 1,820,766 2,005,562 2,213,490 22 23 Non operating rev (exp) 24 WAC Revenue 121,200 294,400 230,400 300,000 480,000 513,600 549,552 25 Bond discount 96,162 (40,162) 79,086 26 Investment income 10,188 0 209 96,556 55,653 57,491 58,427 27 Gain (loss) on disposal of asset 675 28 Interest Expense: 2003C Bonds (12,778) (6,568) 29 Interest Expense: 20GA8-�2014B Rfd Bd (72,300) (60,300) (47,800) (34,800) (15,346) (5,289) 30 Interest Expense:-2099ArBen&2014B Rfd Bds (240,431) (216,462) (190,624) (161,787) (90,720) (65,970) (40,185) 31 Interest Expense: 2011A Bonds (158,730) (200,850) (184,750) (167,800) (150,550) (132,950) (115,000) 32 Interest Expense: 2012A Bonds (87,040) (117,100) (105,700) (93,300) (80,500) (67,200) 33 Interest Expense: 2014A Bonds (83,187) (72,900) (66,550) (60,100) 34 Miscellaneous 35 Intergovernmental 36 Total non-operating Revenue (352,176) (180,658) (349,827) (77,632) 112,837 219,832 325,494 37 38 Net income (loss) 2,090,335 1,368,711 633,566 1,989,391 1,933,603 2,225,393 2,538,983 39 40 Operating transfer in 41 Operating transfer out (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) 42. Net change to retained earnings 1,990,335 1,268,711 533,566 1,889,391 1,833,603 2,125,393 2,438,983 43 • 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 2,265,086 Projected 2,403,030 2,475,121 2,549,375 2,625,856 2,704,632 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 7,972,996 8,388,744 8,827,551 9,290,742 9,779,723 10,295,977 10,841,078 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 130,477 134,391 138,423 142,576 146,853 151,258 155,796 153,662 158,272 163,020 167,911 172,948 178,137 183,481 8,288,135 8,712,408 9,159,994 9,632,229 10,130,524 10,656,372 11,211,355 1,394,773 1,436,616 1,479,714 1,524,106 1,569,829 1,616,924 1,665,432 1,116,123 1,149,607 1,184,095 1,219,618 1,256,206 1,293,893 1,332,709 518,860 534,425 550,458 566,972 583,981 601,500 619,545 625,758 644,531 663,867 683,783 704,296 725,425 747,188 2,265,086 2,333,039 2,403,030 2,475,121 2,549,375 2,625,856 2,704,632 5,920,600 6,098,218 6,281,165 6,469,600 6,663,688 6,863,598 7,069,506 2,367,535 2,614,190 2,878,830 3,162,629 3,466,836 3,792,774 4,141,849 73,503 78,648 84,153 90,044 96,347 103,091 110,308 60,000 57,844 60,668 62,504 63,453 62,895 65,173 (13,545) (96,700) (73,275) (44,550) (15,000) (53,300) (40,650) (29,400) (17,850) (6,000) (53,550) (45,150) (34,800) (25,950) (16,875) (5,700) (83,592) (22,583) 36,071 93,747 136,925 57,195 65,173 2,283,943 2,591,607 2,914,901 3,256,377 3,603,761 3,849,969 4,207,021 (100.000) (100.000) (100.o00) (Iu0,0001 (100,000) (100.000) (100,000 2,183,943 2,491,607 2,814,901 3,156,377 3,503,761 3,749,969 4,107,021 City of Edina Utility Funds - Water Fund Exhibit A Usage/fixed rate increase Other revenue increase Expenditure increase Investment Earnings 44 Cash flow 45 Operating income (loss) 46 Depreciation 50 Bond payments 2003C Prin 51 Bond payment ^^-,�rr2014B Rfd Bd 52 Bond payments 2008A44it-2014B Rdg Bds 53 Bond payments 2011A Prin 54 Bond payments 2012A Prin 55 Bond payments 2014A Prin 56 Non operating 57 Miscellanous-payment of IFL 58 Investment income 59 Transfers 60 Reconcile operating to cash 61 Capital 62 63 2014 proceeds spent 64 Bond Proceeds 65 Bonds: 66 Debt (P&I) - 2015 Bonds 3%, 10 years 67 Debt (P&I) - 2016 Bonds 68 Debt (P&I) - 2017 Bonds 3.5%, 10 yrs 69 Debt (P&I) - 2018 Bonds 70 Debt (P&I) - 2019 Bonds -4%, 10 yrs 71 Debt (P&I) - 2020 Bonds 72 Debt (P&I) - 2021 Bonds 73 Debt (P&I) - 2022 Bonds 74 Debt (P&I) - 2023 Bonds 75 Debt (P&I) - 2024 Bonds 76 Debt (P&1) - 2025 Bonds 76 Debt (P&I) - 2026 Bonds 76 Debt (P&I)-2027 Bonds 76 Debt (P&I) - 2028 Bonds 76 Debt (P&I) - 2029 Bonds 76 Debt (P&I) - 2030 Bonds 77 Net Cashflow 78 79 Beginning cash -Unrestricted 80 Less: restricted cash 81 Ending cash -Unrestricted 83 84 Target cash balance (4 mos operating exp plus 85 next year's debt) -capped at S6.5M 86 Actual cash over (under) target 90 91 92 WAC Units 93 WAC Fee 94 % Increase 5.25% 5.25% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 4.75% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% L00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 100% 1.00% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 240 240 240 240 240 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 800 1,000 1,250 2,000 2,140 2,290 2,450 2,622 2,805 3,001 3,212 3,436 3,677 25.00% 25.00% 60.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 0 • is Projected Per Financial Statements Preliminary Budget Projected 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2,442,511 1,549,368 983,393 2,067,023 1,820,766 2,005,562 2,213,490 2,367,535 2,614,190 2,878,830 3,162,629 3,466,836 3,792,774 4,141,849 1,461,418 1,749,052 2,010,960 2,012,500 2,072,875 2,135,061 2,199,113 2,265,086 2,333,039 2,403,030 2,475,121 2,549,375 2,625,856 2,704,632 (180,000) (185,000) (295,000) (305,000) (320,000) (330,000) (331,150) (345,950) (725,000) (750,000) (780,000) (810,000) (804,000) (846,000) (873,000) (903,000) (770,000) (840,000) (855,000) (870,000) (890,000) (905,000) (925,000) (945,000) (970,000) (1,000,000) (265,000) (305,000) (315,000) (325,000) (340,000) (355,000) (370,000) (380,000) (390,000) (400,000) (345,000) (315,000) (320,000) (325,000) (330,000) (340,000) (350,000) (360,000) (365,000) (380,000) (362,364) (276,820) (309,665) (253,274) 57,184 162,341 267,067 (143,592) (80,427) (24,597) 31,244 73,472 97,391 110,308 (751,547) (442,991) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,188 0 209 96,556 55,653 57,491 58,427 60,000 57,844 60,668 62,504 63,453 62,895 65,173 (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (1001000) (6,372) 183,623 874,750 (8,749,138) (2,586,261) (4,462,928) (2,964,185) (4,339,646) (5,581,654) (7,702,319) (2,186,540) (3,163,298) (3,289,829) (3,421,423) (3,558,280) (3,700,611) (3,848,635) • (4,662,598) 3,840,841 9,620,948 2,115,000 3,500,000 4,800,000 6,900,000 2,100,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 2,600,000 1,500,000 1,300,000 0 (247,943) (247,943) (247,943) (247,943) (247,943) (247,943) (247,943) (247,943) (247,943) (247,943) (410,307) (410,307) (410,307) (410,307) (410,307) (410,307) (410,307) (410,307) (410,307) (577,159) (577,159) (577,159) (577,159) (577,159) (577,159) (577,159) (577,159) (829,665) (829,665) (829,665) (829,665) (829,665) (829,665) (829,665) (258,911) (258,911) (258,911) (258,911) (258,911) (258,911) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (320,556) (184,936) (184,936) (160,278) (3,413,788) (1,934,027) 6,412,667 (4,333,978) 183,740 93,601 157,369 (215,583) 282,364 183,561 94,978 227,716 (557,543) 8,230,228 4,816,441 3,486,623 3,348,006 5,565,312 5,749,052 5,842,653 6,000,023 5,784,439 6,066,803 6,250,364 6,345,342 6,289,545 6,517,261 (6,551,285) 6,551,285 4,816,441 3,486,623 3,348,006 5,565 312 5,749,052 5,842,653 6,000,023 5,784,439 6,066,803 6,250,364 6,345,342 6,289,545 6,517,261 5,959,718 4,421,987 4,897,386 5,317,885 5,065,601 5,445,500 5,621,350 6,500,000 6,290,697 6,500,000 6,500,000 6,264,417 6,091,190 5,922,820 5,739,224 394,454 1,410,763 1,969,880) 499,712 303,552 221,304 499,977 506,257 433,197) (249,636) 80,926 r-198,356 594,441 220,494 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 240 240 240 240 240 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 800 1,000 1,250 2,000 2,140 2,290 2,450 2,622 2,805 3,001 3,212 3,436 3,677 25.00% 25.00% 60.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 0 • is • 0 r� U Appendix B Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 City of Edina Utility Funds - Sanitary Sewer Fund Exhibit B Sanitary Sewer Charges Increase Investment Rate Other revenue increase MCES Disposal Cost Increase Expenditure increase 3.25% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.25% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.00% 4.501/0 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.00% 4.50% 1.001/6 3.00% 5.00% 3.001/. 4.50% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.00% 4.50% 1.00% 3.00% 5.001/0 3.001/. 4.50% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.00% 4.50% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.001/. 4.50% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.00% 4.50% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.00% 4.50% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.001/ 4.50% 1.00% 3.00% 5.00% 3.001/6 Per Financial Statements Preliminary Budget Projected 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 20232024 2025 1 Revenues - 2 3 Sewer Charges 7,490,136 7,811,785 7,551,076 7,984,906 8,344,227 8,719,717 9,112,104 9,522,149 9,950,646 10,398,425 10,866,354 11,355,340 11,866,330 12,400,315 4 Other 97,459 192,250 56,669 103,394 106,496 109,691 112,981 116,371 119,862 123,458 127,162 130,976 134,906 138,953 5 Sewer Charges related to growth 0 13,860 I 28,968 45,407 47,451 51,652 56,135 60,918 66,017 71,451 77,241 6 Total operating revenues 7,587,595 8,004,035 7,607,745 8,088,300 8,464,583 8,858,376 9,270,493 9,685,971 10,122,160 10,578,018 11,054,433 11,552,333 12,072,687 12,616,509 7 8 Expenses 9 10 Disposal Charges 4,244,096 4,242,719 4,771,504 4,622,800 4,853,940 5,096,637 5,351,469 5,619,042 5,899,994 6,194,994 6,504,744 6,829,981 7,171,480 7,530,054 Il Admin. 570,903 672,004 610,547 1,239,238 1,276,415 1,314,707 1,354,148 1,394,773 1,436,616 1,479,714 1,524,106 1,569,829 1,616,924 1,665,432 12 Collection Systems 376,432 409,320 326,857 343,400 353,702 364,313 375,242 386,500 398,095 410,038 422,339 435,009 448,059 461,501 13 Depreciation 497,225 565,578 579,828 575,000 592,250 640,018 689,218 709,895 751,191 793,727 837,539 892,665 949,445 1,007,928 14 15 Total operating expense 5,688,656 5,889,621 6,288,735 6,780,438 7,076,307 7,415,675 7,770,078 8,110,209 8,485,896 8,878,473 9,288,727 9,727,484 10,185,908 10,664,915 M I7 Operating income (loss) 1,898,939 2,114,414 1,319,010 1,307,863 1,388,276 1,442,701 1,500,415 1,575,761 1,636,263 1,699,545 1,765,706 1,824,849 1,886,779 19951,594 19 Non operating rev (exp) 20 Investment income - 23,154 0 39,805 36,989 41,117 35,753 39,601 40,722 40,692 43,075 44,495 45,264 21 City SAC Revenue 0 114,700 150,000 240,000 256,800 274,776 36,751 39,324 42,077 45,022 48,173 51,546 55,154 22 Gain (loss) on disposal of asset 23 Interest Expense: 1999A Bonds 24 Interest Expense: 2003C Bonds (12,778) 25 Interest Expense: 2007B-Bends,2014B Rf, (36,600) (30,500) (24,200) (17,600) (7,880) (2,665) 26 Interest Expense: 2008A -Beads -2014B (92,812) (82,312) (73,588) (62,431) (34,776) (25,289) (15,404) (5,192) 27 Interest Expense: 201IABonds (12,482) (15,800) (14,550) (13,250) (11,900) (10,500) (9,100) (7,650) (5,775) (3,525) (1,200) 28 Interest Expense: 2012A Bonds (25,529) (34,300) (30,900) (27,300) (23,600) (19,700) (15,600) (11,850) (8,550) (5,175) (1,725) 29 Miscellaneous 30 Intergovernmental 195,269 31 32 Total non operating (131,518) (154,141) 163,331 25,819 197,949 231,735 271,689 44,062 61,299 70,724 79,339 89,524 96,041 100,418 33 34 Net income (loss) 1,767,421 1,960,273 1,482,341 1,333,682 1,586,226 1,674,436 1,772,104 1,619,824 1,697,563 1,770,268 1,845,045 1,914,373 1,982,820 2,052,012 35 36 Operating transfers in 37 Operating transfers out 38 39 Net change to retained earnings 1,767,421 1,960,273 1,482,341 1,333,682 1,586,226 1,674,436 1,772,104 1,619,824 1,697,563 1,770,268 1,845,045 1,914,373 1,982,820 2,052,012 1 City of Edinle • • Utility Funds - Sanitary Sewer Fund Exhibit B Sanitary Sewer Charges Increase Investment Rate - Other revenue increase MCES Disposal Cost Increase Expenditure increase 40 3.25% 41 Cash flow 42 Operating income (loss) 43 Depreciation 47 Bond payments: 1999A P&I 48 Bond payments: 2003C Prin 49 Bond payments.„ 2014B Rfd B 50 Bond payments 244 A4Ihia-201413 Rdg 1 51 Bond Payments: 2011A Prue 52 Bond Payments: 2012A Prin 53 Net other 54 Investment income 55 5.00% 56 Met Council I&d Surcharge 57 Met Council I&I Surcharge Rebate (50% 58 Capital 59 2008 proceeds spent 60 Bond proceeds 61 Bonds: 62 3.00% 63 Debt (P&I) - 2015 Bonds 64 Debt (P&I) - 2016 Bonds 65 Debt (P&I) - 2017 Bonds 66 Debt (P&I) - 2018 Bonds 67 Debt (P&I) - 2019 Bonds 68 Debt (P&I) - 2020 Bonds 70 Debt (P&I) - 2021 Bonds 71 Debt (P&I) - 2022 Bonds 72 Debt (P&I) - 2023 Bonds 73 Debt (P&I) - 2024 Bonds 74 Debt (P&I) - 2025 Bonds 75 Debt (M) - 2026 Bonds 76 Debt (P&I) - 2027 Bonds 77 Debt (P&I) - 2028 Bonds 78 Debt (P&I) - 2029 Bonds 79 Cash flow 80 (170,000) 81 Beginning cash -Unrestricted 82 Less: restricted cash 83 Ending cash -Unrestricted 84 85 Target Cash Balance (4 mos of operating 86 expenses plus next year's debt 87 Actual cash over (under) target 91 (324,300) 92 New SAC Units 93 SAC Fee 94 % Increase to SAC Fee 3.25% 3.25% 4.50% 4.50% 1.00% 1,00% 1.00% 1.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 5.00% 5.001/6 5.00% 5.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3:00% 3.00% 3.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.001/6 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00°/ 3.00% Per Financial Statements Preliminary Budget Projected 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 1,898,939 2,114,414 1,319,010 1,307,863 1,388,276 1,442,701 1,500,415 1,575,761 1,636,263 1,699,545 1,765,706 1,824,849 1,886,779 1,951,594 497,225 565,578 579,828 575,000 592,250 640,018 689,218 709,895 751,191 793,727 837,539 892,665 949,445 1,007,928 (180,000) (185,000) ' (150,000) (155,000) (160,000) (170,000) (170,050) (177,650) (280,000) (280,000) (300,000) (315,000) (308,200) (324,300) (334,650) (346,150) -- (60,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70,000) (70,000) (70,000) (75,000) (75,000) (75,000) (80,000) (80,000) (90,000) (90,000) ,(95,000) (100,000) (105,000) (110,000) (110,000) (115,000) (115,000) (154,672) (154,141) (31,938) 25,819 158,144 194,746 230,572 8,309 21,699 30,002 38,647 46,448 51,546 55,154 23,154 0 0 0 39,805 36,989 41,117 35,753 39,601 40,722 40,692 43,075 44,495 45,264 (2,320,000) (2,116,031) (3,358,830) (3,321,908) (2,558,807) (2,141,377) (2,067,124) (2,676,636) (2,783,702) (2,895,050) (3,010,852) (3,131,286) (3,256,537) 1,126,033 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 (3% for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (3% for 10 years) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (3.5% for 10 years) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (175,646) (175,846) (175,846) (175,846) (3.5% for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4%f)r 10 years) - (123,291) () (123,291) (123,291) (123,291) (123,291) (4%for 10 years) (123,291) (123,291) (123,291) (123,291) (123291) (4% for 10 years) (123,291) (123,291) (123,291) (123,291) (4% for 10 years) (184,936) (184,936) (184,936) (4% for l0 years) (184,936) (184,936) (40% for 10 years) (184,936) (41/a for 10 years) (49/. for 10 years) (4% for 10 years) (4% for 10 years) (4% for 10 years) 460,679 (270,181) 1,261,900 (2,090,149) (281,682) 412,850 (536,396) 384,753 112,135 (2,980) 238,302 142,017 76,874 394,362 4,380,306 4,840,985 4,808,785 6,070,685 3,980,536 3,698,854 4,111,704 3,575,308 3,960,061 4,072,196 4,069,216 4,307,518 4,449,536 4,526,410 4,840,985 4,808,785 6,070,685 3,980,536 3,698,854 4,111,704 3,575,308 3,960,061 4,072,196 4,069,216 4,307,518 4,449,536 4,526,410 4,920,771 2,825,171 I 2,813,005 2,965,238 3,093,259 3,381,557 3,496,032 3,625,811 3,516,181 3,765,412 4,163,073 4,406,948 4,628,724 4,974,109 5,388,344 2,015 814 1,995 780 3,105,446 887,277 317,297 615,673 50,503 443,880 306,784 93,856 (99,430) 179,189 447,700 467,572 0 240 240 240 240 240 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 400 500 625 1,000 1,070 1,145 1,225 1,311 1,403 1,501 1,606 1,718 1,838 25.0% 25.0% 60.0% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00`/0 7.00% • Appendix C Storm Sewer Utility Projections 0 Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 City of 0 • 0 Utility Funds - Storm Sewer Fund Statements Appendix C Bud et Storm Sewer Revenue Increase Other revenue increase Investment Rale Expenditure increase I Revenues 2012 2 Charges for services 2014 Other 2016 4 2018 5 Total operating revenues 2020 6 2022 7 Expenses 2024 8 Admin 2,540,358 9 Operating Expenses 2,864,931 1() Depreciation 3,139,781 II Total operating expense 3,561,218 12 4,039,222 13 Operating income (loss) 4,581,387 U 5,196,323 15 8,922 16 Cash 11- 10,475 17 Operating mwme (loss) 37,579 18 Depreciation 42,623 19 Interest income 48,345 20 Transfers 54,834 21 Bond proceeds 62,194 22 2014 Bond proceeds spent on capital 2,549,280 23 Debt payments: 1999 bonds P&I 2,875,406 24 Debt payments:2007-bemdsF&I-2014B Rfd Bd 25 Debt payments: 2008A"beada4r&4-2014B Rdg Bd 26 Debt payments: 2011A bonds P&I 3,603,841 27 Debt payments: 2012A bonds P&I 4,087,567 28 Debt payments: 2014A bonds P&I 4,636,220 29 5,258,517 30 Debt (P&I) - 2015 Bonds (3% for 1 31 Debt (P&O -2016 Bonds (3%for 1 32 Debt (M) - 2017 Bonds (3.5% lot 33 Debt (P&I) - 2018 Bonds (3.5% for 34 Debt (M) -2019 Bonds (4.0% for 35 Debt (P&1) -2020 Bonds (4.0% for 36 Debt (P&1) - 2021 Bonds (4.0% flat 37 Debt (P&I) - 2022 Bonds (4.0%For 38 Debt (P&I)-2023 Bonds (4.0%flat 39 Debt (P&I) - 2024 Bonds (4.0% for 40 Debt (P&I) - 2025 Bonds (4.0% for 41 Debt (P&I) - 2026 Bonds (4.0% for 42 Debt (P&I)-2027 Bonds (4.0% for 43 Debt (P&I) - 2028 Bonds (4-0% for 44 Debt (P&I) - 2029 Bonds (4:0% for 45 Net change in balance sheet items 904,308 46 Capital 1,012,670 47 1,203,839 48 Cash flow 1,392,702 49 1,634,670 56 Beginning cash-Unresuicted 1,904,198 51 Less restricted cash 1,125,192 52 Ending Cob -Unrestricted 1,325,409 G 1,588,432 64 Quarterly Charge for Single Family Home 1,708,575 6.00% 6.00% 10.00% 6.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.001/6 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 6.50% 6.50% 6.50% 6.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 3.00% 3.00% _ 3.00% 3.00% 6.50% 6.501Y. 6.5DYe 6.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Per Financial Statements Preliminary Bud et Pro'ecled 2012 1 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2,540,358 2,710,871 2,864,931 2,854,346 3,139,781 3,343,866 3,561,218 3,792,697 4,039,222 4,301,772 4,581,387 4,879,177 5,196,323 5,534,084 8,922 39,059 10,475 34,163 37,579 40,022 42,623 45,394 48,345 51,487 54,834 58,398 62,194 66,236 2,549,280 2,749,93D 2,875,406 2,888,509 3,177,360 3,383,888 3,603,841 3,838,091 4,087,567 4,353,258 4,636,220 4,937,575 5,258,517 5,600,320 185,073 97,838 133,480 73,605 75,813 78,088 80,430 82,843 85,328 87,888 90,525 93,241 96,038 98,919 230,551 346.991 287,621 388,300 399,949 411,947 424,306 437,035 450,146 463,651 477,560 491,887 506,643 521,843 709,568 833,871 904,308 900,000 1,012,670 1,104,771 1,203,839 1,281,265 1,392,702 1,510,402 1,634,670 1,765,824 1,904,198 2,050,138 1,125,192 1,278,700 1,325,409 1,361,905 1,588,432 1,594,806 1,708,575 1,801,143 1,928,176 2,061,941 2,202,755 2,350,952 2,506,879 2,670,900 1,424,088 1,471,230 1,549,997 1,526,604 1,588,928 1,789,083 1,895,266 2,036,948 2,159,390 2,291,318 2,433,465 2,586,623 2,751,638 2929,411 1,424,088 1,471,230 1,549,997 1,526,604 1,588,928 1,789,083 1,895,266 2,036,948 2,159,390 2,291,318 2,433,465 2,586,623 2,751,638 2,929,421 709,568 833,871 904,308 900,000 1,012,670 1,104,771 1,203,839 1,281,265 1,392,702 1,510,402 1,634,670 1,765,824 1,904,198 2,050,138 12,966 0 23,662 20,771 22,586 23,866 26,503 29,269 30,659 32,853 35,790 38,903 42,232 46,184 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,834,146 4,180,338 3,100,000 3,440,000 2,500,000 2,400,000 1,100,000 2,400,000 2,850,000 3,100,000 3,200,000 3,350,000 3,350,000 (1,668,500) (435,200) (431,000) (431,300) (431,000) (412,049) (417,571) (266,538) (276,195) (267,862) (269,881) (253,504) (258,392) (258,736) (259,688) (27,522) (169,850) (177,050) (174,150) (176,200) (178,150) (175,050) (176,900) (177,825) (177,800) (177,625) (41,564) (180,950) (195,550) (194,650) (193,550) (197,150) (195,450) (194,425) (194,100) (193,625) (197,925) (279,568) (252,850) (253,700) (254,450) (255,100) (249,600) (252,850) (252,050) (251,100) (253,750) years) (363,415) (363,415) (363,415) (363,415) (363,415) (363,415) (363,415 63,415 (3 ) (363,413) (363,415) 'Years) (403,273) (403,273) (403,273) (403,273) (403,273) (403,273) (403,273) (403,273) (403,273) to years) (300,603) (300,603) (300,603) (300,603) (300,603) (300,603) (300,603) (300,603) 103"em's) (288,579) (288,579) (288,579) (288,579) (288,579) (288,579) (288,579) 10 years) (135,620) (318,403 (318,403) (318,403) (318,403) (318,403) 10 years) (295,898) (295,898) (295,898) (295,898) (295,898) 10 Years) (351,379) - (351,379) (382,202) (382,202) 10 years) (382,202) (382,202) (382,202) 10 years) (394,531) (394,531) 10 years) (413,025) 10 years) 10 years) 10 Years) 10 years) 10 years) (60,617) (3,020.000) (1.968,576) (1,200,011) (5,511,230) (4,283,485) (3,086.036) (3,296,246) (2,065,547) (3,649.959) (3,795,957) (3,947,79.5) (4,105,707) (4.269,935) (4,440,733) 231,508 (582,084) 4,340,515 (2982,504) 128,031 263,633 276,684 138927 219,452 293,695 311,280 332,866 395,276 392,880 2,792,817 1,482,673 900,589 2,077,138 2,258,600 2,386,632 2,650,265 2,926,949 3,065,876 3,285,328 3,579,023 3,890,303 4,223,168 4,618,444 (31163,966) 3,163,966 1,482,673 900,589 2,077,138 2,258,600 2,386,632 2,650,265 2,926,949 3,065,876 3,285,328 3,579,023 3,890,303 4,223,168 4,618,444 5,011,324 20.56 21.59 22.89 24.26 26.68 28.42 30.27 32.23 34.33 36.56 38.94 41.47 44.16 47.03 • Appendix D Capital Improvement Plan for Water 0 n U Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • City of Edina Utility Funds Water Fund Capital Improvements Exhibit D 1 a a 6 B r e e 10 n 1T 1a 14 18 16 11 is to 20 r u as as u za n as a0 39 as u 34 as u 3r a0 aB a0 of 43 43 as a6 46 a ae 40 s0 s1 sa w ss 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Main Rehabilltation/Re IacementlExtensions: PROJ. # Water main improvements ENG -13-002 $ 1,200,000 $ 2,550,000 S 2,550,000 $ 2,550,000 $ 2,550,000 $ 2,550,000 $ 2,550,000 Morningside neighborhood water main relining 151-161 $ 50,000 $ 60,000 Well Rehabilitation/Replacement/Construction: Piping wells #15 and #9 to treatment plant 6 ENG -13-005 $ 1,100,000 Well #16 rehab 16-104 $ 120,000 Well #6 W 69th St 16-102 $ 120,000 Well #6 rehab 15.101 $ 120,000 Well #9 rehab UT -10-008 Well #11 rehab UT -10,009 $ 120,000 Well #15 rehab 15-099 $ 120,000 Well #17 rehab 16.100 $ 120,000 Well #10 rehab 16-098 $ 120 DDO Well #18 15-103 $ 120,000 Southdale Tower rehab 15-109 $ 500,000 Control System, Equipment Re Iacements[U rades: Utllltles equipment re lacemenl PW -13-005 $ 40,000 $ 221,600 $ 80,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Water meter replacement project UT -10-006 SCADA radio system upgrade 15-094/15-095 $ 17 ODO $ 24,000 Asset management update 15.173 $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Water Treatment Plant Rehab: Well #13 rehab PW -13,006 Well #17 rehab PW -13-007 Well #16 rehab PW -13-008 Water treatment plant#6 15162 $ 500,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 5,000,000 Well #21 and raw water line 15-164 $ 75,000 $ 600,000 Miscellaneous Projects: (engineer amts Include Inflation Reconstruct Valley View Rd ENG -15-124 $ 40,000 Reconstruct Tracy Ave ENG -15-125 $ 250,000 Parklawn Ave 16-126 $ 250,000 W 62nd Street 15.128 $ 250,000 Bimhcrest A and B Neighborhood 15-129/15-138 $ 290,000 $ 452,336 Arden Park D Neighborhood 15-130 $ 1,520,000 Proect Knolls A and B Neighborhood 15-131/16-146 $ 11D,300 $ 316,395 Countryside H and I Neighborhood 15-132115-145 $ 318,055 $ 151,240 Dewey Hill B-E, G Nel hborhood 16.133/15-142 $ 64,730 $ 1,105,158 Strachhauer Park A Neighborhood 15.134 $ 375,868 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood 15-135 $ 1,534,970 Morningside A/White Oak C Neighborhood 16136 $ 340,248 Normandale Park D Neighborhood 15-137 $ 996,923 Parkwood Koos B Neighborhood 15.139 $ 187,003 Chowen Park A and B Neighborhood 15-140/15-141 $ 379,752 Concord D/Pamela B-E Neighborhood 15-143 $ 807,727 Indian Hills C/Creek Valley B Neighborhood 15-144 $ 39,633 Valle Viaw, Tracy Lane, Valley Lane 15.151 $ 70,DD0 $ 40,000 Dublin Reservoir Pump 16-105 $ 30,000 $ 45,000 Cah[IVDewey Hill Rd 15.175 Concrete rehab-Parklawn Ave PW -00,074 Reconstruct W 54th St Wooddale to Francis PW -01-012 $ 40,000 Reconstruct W 58th St Wooddale to Francis PW -16,123 $ 122,500 Miscellaneous Future ss TOTAL $ 2,510,000 $ 2,964,185 $ 4,280,086 $ 5,286,262 $ 7,044,910 $ 2,059,995 $ 2,600,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 2,600,000 $ 2,600,000 61 ss Inflated Costs 4.00% $ 2,510,000 $ 2,964,185 $ 4,339,646 $ 5,581,654 $ 7,702,319 $ 2,186,540 $ 3,163,298 $ 3,289,829 $ 3,421,423 $ 3,558,280 $ 3,700,611 $ 3,848,635 0 Appendix E Capital Improvement Plan for Sanitary Sewer • Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • City of Ediaa Ut0ity Fund1 Sanitary Selvcr Fund Capital Improvement, Appendix E i 2 3 a 6 6 a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 w 16 zo 21 22 u 24 25 26 27 23 m 3a 31 32 d3 a4 36 36 a7 ae 16 11 42 a a1 d6 I6 47 a 46 • • Main Rehabilitation/Replacement/Extensions: PROJ # ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- Trunk sanitary sewer lining project UT -08-014 $ 600,000 Sanitary sewer main improvements ENG -13-003 $ 690,000 ,l $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000$ 2 100 000 $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 Lift Station Rehabilitation/Re lecement/Construction: Remove lift station #1 UT -03-010 Sanitary lift station #3 upgrade 15-090 $ 125,000 Sanitary lift station #14 upgrade 15-092 $ 75,000 W 69th Sl and York Ave watennain loo UT -10-011 $ 150,000 Control System, Equipment Re Iacements/U redes: SCADA U redes 15-094 $ 16,000 $ 23,000 Utilities a ui ment replacement 15-108 $ 410,000 $ 20,000 $ 25 000 20,000 $ 17,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ 1001000 $ 100,000 $ 100 000 $ 100,000 Sanitary Sewer Treatment Plant Rehab: Miscellaneous Projects: (engineer amts include inflation Reconstruct Valley View Rd ENG -13-009 Reconstruct Tracy Ave ENG -13-010 Concrete rehab-Parklawn Ave PW -OD -074 Reconstruct W 54th St oddale to Francis PW -01-012 $ 20,000 Reconstruct Valley View Rd ENG -15-124 $ 20,000 Reconstruct Tracy Ave ENG -15-125 $ 200,000 Parklawn Ave 15-126 $ 200,000 W 62nd Street 15-128 $ 200,000 Birchcrest A and B Neighborhood 15-129/15-138 $ 475,000 $ 324,354 Arden Park D Neighborhood 15-130 $ 1,735,000 Pro ecl Knolls A and B Neighborhood 15-131/15-146 $ 127,805 $ 226,875 Countryside H and I Neighborhood 15-132/15-145 $ 238,580 $ 108,449 Dewey Hill B-E G Nei hborhood 15-133/15-142 $ 126,445 E 546,573 Slrachhauer Park A Neighborhood 15-134 $ 269,521 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood 15-135 $ 728,774 Morningside A/White Oak C Neighborhood 15-136 $ 375,893 Normandale Park D Neighborhood 15-137 $ 473,320 Packwood KoBs B Neighborhood 15-139 $ 134,093 Chowen Park A and B Neighborhood 15-140/15-141 $ 272,307 Concord D/Pamela B-E Neighborhood 15-143 $ 383,493 Minnehaha Trunk Sewer linin 15-150 $ 1,100,000 Sanitary trunk capacity expansion 15-147 $ 120,000 $ 250,000 $ 1,600,000 Cahill RdIDemy Hill 15-175 $ 20,000 Indian Hills C/Creek Valley B Neighborhood 15-144 $ 28,419 Valley View, Tracy Lane, Valley Lane 15-151 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 Dublin Reservoir Pum 15-105 Presidents Area sewer rehab 15-148 $ 1,000,000 72nd North Branch Trunk 15-149 $ 1,300 000 Reconstruct W 58th St oddale to Francis PW -15-123 Sewer'etter replacement UT -07-008 Manhole repair project UT -10-010 Annual vehicle replacement UT -11-005 Asset m mt software 16-173 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Sewer camera and cable reel UT -11-008 30 Kw generator UT -12-005 Cltyworks asset management update UT -12-008 $ 10,000 66 TOTAL $ 1,470,000 T3 T37312.168 $ 2,556,767 $ 2,138,860 $ 2,064,236 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 67 u Inflated Costs 4.00% $ 1,470,000 $ 3,358,830 $ 3,321,908 $ 2,558,807 $ 2,141,377 $ 2,067,124 $ 2,676,636 $ 2,783,702 $ 2,895,050 $ 3,010,852 $ 3,131286 $ 3,256,537 0 Appendix F Capital Improvement Plan for Storm Sewer 11 Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 City of Edina Utility Funds Storm Sewer Fund Capital Improvements Appendix F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 19 11 12 37 36 n 4n 41 42 43 44 13 1a 15 16 17 19 19 29 21 22 z3 24 25 26 27 29 zs 30 3t 32 33 34 35 36 2014 2015 2016 2017 2016 2019 2020 20201 2022 2023 2024 2025 45 TOTAL $ 2,892,000 $ 5,511,230 $ 4,258,965 $ 3,063,596 $ 3,266,901 $ 2,065,547 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 ss 47 Inflated Costs 4.00% $ 2,892,000 $ 5,511,230 $ 4,283,465 $ 3,066,036 $ 3,296,246 $ 2,065,547 $ 3,649,959 $ 3,795,957 $ 3,947,795 $ 4,105,707 $ 4,269,935 $ 4,440,733 PROJ. # Storm sewer -pipe and grading improvements ENG -13-004 $ 2,200,000 Reconstruct 2nd St South ENG -13-006 Reconstruct Valley Yew Rd ENG -13-009 Reconstruct Tracy Ave ENG -13-010 2013-2014 Flood Protection and Water Improvements ENG -13-011 $ 35,000 2014-2015 Flood Protection and Water Improvements ENG -13-012 $ 50,000 2015-2016 Flood Protection and Water Improvements ENG -13-013 Comprehensive Water Resource M mt Plan 15-170 $ 200,000 Storm water pollution prevention plan ENG -13-017 NMWD Petiton Pro ects-Phase I ENG -13-018 $ 180,000 Concrete rehab:Parkiawn Ave France to W 7 PW -00-074 Flood protection 15-169 $ 525,000 $ 275,000 Utilities equipment re lacement 15-112 $ 197,000 $ 120,000 $ 219,000 Storm water lift station #3 rehab UT -11,007 $ 200,000 Sewer camera and cable reel UT -11-008 SCADA radios stem upilrade 15-094 $ 16,000 $ 23,000 Promenade Phase 2 15-172 $ 550,000 Asset management update 15-173 $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Cooper Circle pond outlet 15-166 $ 250,000 Future estimated -based on average $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Miscellaneous Projects: (engineer amts Include Inflation Reconstruct W 54th St Wooddale to France PW -01-012 $ 20,000 Reconstruct W 58th St ooddale to France PW -04-001 Reconstruct Tracy Ave ENG -15-125 $ 120,000 Parklawn Ave 15-126 $ 120,000 W 62nd Street 15-128 $ 120,000 BirchcrestA and B Neighborhood 15-129/15-138 $ 826,000 $ 1,438,955 Arden Park D Nei hborhood 15-130 $ 1,213,000 Proect Knolls A and B Neighborhood 15-131/15-146 $ 188,345 $ 936,555 Count side H and I Neighborhood 15.132/15-145 $ 1,250,400 $ 447,684 Dewey Hill B-E, G Neighborhood 15-133/15-142 $ 437,485 $ 975,801 Strachhauer Park A Neighborhood 15-134 $ 1,192,601 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood 15-135 $ 1,071,785 Morningside A/White Oak C Neighborhood 15-136 $ 1,011,579 Normandale Park D Neighborhood 15-137 $ 796,097 Parkwood Kolls B Neighborhood 15-139 $ 553,544 Chowen Park A and B Neighborhood 15-140/15-141 $ 1,954,100 Concord D/Pamela B-E Neighborhood 15-143 $ 563,992 Indlan Hills C/Creek Valley B Neighborhood 15-144 $ 117,315 Valley View, Tracy Lane, Valley Lane 15-151 $ 80,000 Dublin Reservoir Pum 15-105 Reconstruct W 58th St Wooddale to Francis PW -15-123 $ 105,000 Reconstruct Valley View Rd ENG -15-124 $ 340,000 54th St 15-174 $ 50,000 Cahill/Dewe Rd 15-175 $ 40,000 45 TOTAL $ 2,892,000 $ 5,511,230 $ 4,258,965 $ 3,063,596 $ 3,266,901 $ 2,065,547 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 ss 47 Inflated Costs 4.00% $ 2,892,000 $ 5,511,230 $ 4,283,465 $ 3,066,036 $ 3,296,246 $ 2,065,547 $ 3,649,959 $ 3,795,957 $ 3,947,795 $ 4,105,707 $ 4,269,935 $ 4,440,733 • Appendix G Proposed Rates in Cubic Feet and Gallons • • Utility Rate Study City of Edina, Minnesota September, 2015 • Chapter and Section Purpose o f FeelCharge 2015 Current Fee _T Proposed Fee Effective January I, 2016 Chapter 28 28.43(6) Sewer Service: Based upon water usage during winter quarter (November I to March I) Based upon water usage during winter quarter (November I to March 1). City Staff will determine which accounts will be billed in cubic feet and which accounts will be billed in gallons and use the appropriate rates for each. I. Single-family, townhouses, two-family dwellings, apartment buildings containing four or less dwelling units $54.58 Per quarter to and including 1,600 cubic feet $57.04 Per quarter to and including 1,600 cubic feet $3.41 Additional from 1,601 cubic feet and over $3.56 Additional from 1,601 cubic feet and over $57.00 Per quarter to and including 12,000 gallons $4.75 Additional from 12,001 gallons and over 2. Apartment building with more than four dwelling units $49.12 Per quarter for each unit over four; or $51.33 Per quarter for each unit over four; or $3.41 Per 100 cubic feet of water used, whichever is greater $3.56 Per 100 cubic feet of water used, whichever is greater $51.33 Per quarter for each unit over four; or $4.7S Per 1,000 gallons of water used, whichever is greater 3. Commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and churches $54.58 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises; or $57.04 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises; or $3.41 Per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, $3.56 whichever is greater Per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater $57.00 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises; or $4.75 Per 1,000 gallons of water used during the quarter, whichever is Water Service: City Staff will determine which accounts will be billed in cubic feet and which accounts will be billed in gallons and use the appropriate rates for each. 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of city, except in the Morningside area $1.45 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.52 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.93 3,600 to 6,500 cubic feet $2.02 3,600 to 6,500 cubic feet $3.02 Over 6,500 cubic feet $3.16 Over 6,500 cubic feet $2.54 Per 100 cubic feet -Morningside area $2.54 Per 100 cubic feet -Morningside area 1. Per 1,000 gallons for areas of city, except in the Morningside area $2.03 Up to 26,000 gallons $2.70 26,001 to 49,000 gallons $4.22 Over 49,000 gallons $3.39 Per 1,000 gallons -Morningside area 2. Domestic accounts used by commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and churches $1.45 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.52 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $1.93 Over 3,500 cubic feet $2.02 Over 3,500 cubic feet $2.03 Up to 26,000 gallons $2.70 Over 26,000 gallons 3. Lawn watering accounts used by commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and churches $1.93 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $2.02 Up to 3,500 cubic feet $3.02 Over 3,500 cubic feet $3.16 Over 3,500 cubic feet $2.70 Up to 26,000 gallons $4.22 Over 26,000 gallons N:\Minnsota\EDINA\Financial Planning\Utility Rate Study\2015 Update\Report\Copy of 2015 Fee Changes 9/4/2015 Chapter and Section Purpose o fFee/Charge 2015 Current Fee Proposed Fee Effective January f, 2016 4. Meter charge $17.69 Per quarter for up to 3/4-inch meter $18.53 Per quarter for up to 3/4-inch meter $24.12 Per quarter for I-inch meter $25.27 Per quarter for 1-inch meter $27.52 Per quarter for I i/4-inch meter $28.83 Per quarter for I i/4-inch meter $30.95 Per quarter for I h-inch meter $32.42 Per quarter for 13/3-inch meter $49.84 Per quarter for 2-inch meter $52.21 Per quarter for 2-inch meter $189.26 Per quarter for 3-inch meter $198.25 Per quarter for 3-inch meter $240.90 Per quarter for 4-inch meter $252.34 Per quarter for 4-inch meter $305.29 Per quarter for 6-inch meter $319.79 Per quarter for 6-inch meter $387.70 Per quarter for 8-inch meter $406.12 Per quarter for 8-inch meter 28-208 2B-209 Stormwater drainage charge $24.26 Per quarter pursuant to formula in section 28-208 $26.68 Per quarter pursuant to formula in section 28-208 N:\MinnWDINA\Financial Plan ning\Utility Rate Study\2015 Update\Report\Copy of 2015 Fee Chan0 9/4V • is To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Agenda Item #: VII. C. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: September 16, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance 2015-20 Amending Chapter 4 Concerning Alcoholic Beverages (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only.) Action Requested: Grant First Reading of Ordinance 2015-20. Information / Background: Edina's liquor ordinance has been modified on several occasions since licenses for on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages began to be issued in the 1980s. After three decades of modifications, the current code requirements can be confusing to businesses and difficult for staff to interpret, apply _and enforce. Some of the detailed regulations position restaurants in Edina at a disadvantage compared to restaurants in adjacent municipalities that are subject to different regulations. In January 2015, the City solicited input from residents and businesses concerning desired changes to the regulation of alcoholic beverages. The public comments (summary attached) were presented at the February 17, 2015 City Council meeting. In brief, the 102 participants favored elimination of the 60/40 food -to - beverage ratio, supported new tap rooms and strongly preferred restaurants that serve liquor instead of bars that serve liquor without food service. Representatives of several businesses were also consulted during the preparation of this proposed ordinance. Input was provided by representatives of the 50th & France Business Association, Edina Chamber of Commerce and Minnesota Restaurant Association. Based on the input collected from residents and the business community, staff from each City Department has worked with the City Attorney to rewrite the liquor code to better reflect the interests of the community. The proposed ordinance eliminates Chapter 4 in its entirety and replaces it with new language that more effectively regulates the sale of alcoholic beverages with minimal red tape. The goals of the ordinance rewrite include: 1) streamlined language for the sake of clarity and enforceability;. 2) allow new establishments that are responsive to the preferences of Edina patrons; and 3) allow established and new businesses to prosper in the Edina marketplace subject to an efficient regulatory process. A summary of anticipated amendments is attached to more easily identify changes in regulations. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 The proposed ordinance is presented for the First Reading only. The Second Reading is anticipated after the Plan Commission provides a recommendation for new zoning regulations for tap rooms and distilleries. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the First Reading of Ordinance 2015-20. Attachments: Speak Up Edina summary, February 2015 Summary of Anticipated Amendments, August 20, 2015 Proposed Ordinance No. 2015-20 • • is The CITY of �. �y EDINA Speak Up, Edina! Liquor Ordinance Revisions Liquor Law Discussion Open Dec. 31 to Feb. 2 102 total comments made 1,692 visitors, 2,164 visits 6,913 page views 41 % visited more than once Most respondents from Edina www.EdinaMN.gov e The CITY of �y EDINA •',�Tlltl�lll �11�` 1 kw • 7 • Comment Summary • • 1lrL e The CITY of Hr� �y EDINA Of 56 responses to eliminating the ratio, two were not in favor of changing or eliminating the law as it stands - However, don't want to see Edina become the Warehouse District - City not as competitive as many neighbors for businesses - Old, antiquated law Bars/Taprooms - Majority are comfortable with bars and/or taprooms - May need to limit licenses available. - Don't see need for bars in Edina without food. -Tap rooms attractive to young people and drive businesses to Edina. www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Comment Summary (cont.) • Concerns www.EdinaMN.gov %w e ���, The CITY of 0 "). " 3y EDINA - Few have major concerns over a change in ordinance. - City/PD should plan for staffing and funding for prevention and enforcement, possibly funded through license fees, taxes and fines. - Intoxicated drivers on City streets, endangering others. Consider unintended consequences. - Concern Edina lags behind neighboring cities. 0 0 0 4 • Anticipated Amendments to Edina Liquor Ordinance The City of Edina intends to revise its liquor ordinance in 2015. The following is a summary of potential revisions based on preliminary stakeholder input from residents, businesses, and staff members. The purpose of the rewrite is to address concerns from Edina businesses and residents as they relate to key components of the ordinance, as well as to create a more tactical and enforceable ordinance that enhances the quality of life in Edina in a safe and responsible manner. The goals of the ordinance rewrite include: I ) Streamline ordinance language for the sake of clarity and enforceability 2) Allow new establishments that are responsive to preferences of Edina patrons 3) Allow established and new businesses to prosper in the Edina marketplace subject to an efficient regulatory process 1. Streamline ordinance language • • Retain off -sale licenses to municipal liquor stores (Sec 4.2) • Replace the much amended ordinance with a new and up-to-date ordinance template as recommended by the City Attorney. • Reflect current State law and eliminate conflicting and confusing local provisions. • Use terms that are defined in State law and industry -standards instead of definitions with a purely local definition. • Clarify language regarding consumption of alcohol in outdoor public places such as sidewalk cafes, street festivals, public parks and golf courses. • Delete specific criteria related to gaming establishments (eg Pinstripes and Dave & Busters in Sec. 4-34(f) and 4-34(g)) and replace with general provisions applicable to all establishments. • Clarify the definition of "Restaurant" in accordance with State law and Edina health code. Retain the issuance of on -sale liquor license to places that hold restaurant license, either high-risk, medium -risk or low-risk, as defined elsewhere. • Clarify the meaning of "compact and contiguous premises" in Sec. 4-72 for outdoor • areas where alcohol consumption is allowed. August 20, 2015 Page I 2. Allow new establishments that are responsive to preferences of • Edina patrons • Retain preference for commercial establishments with a dining component as well as liquor service. • Add brewpub license in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 340A.301, Subdivision 6 for restaurants in commercial zoning districts. • Add taproom license in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 340A.301, Subdivision 6 for breweries in the industrial zoning district. • Add cocktail room license in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 340A.301, Subdivision 6c for distilleries in the industrial zoning district. • Retain other license types as currently found in Sec. 4-26. 3. Efficient and effective regulatory practices Eliminate Sec. 4-77(3) which mandates a 60/40 ratio for food -to -liquor gross sales • ratios. This change is consistent with other metro cities including Minneapolis who repealed similar provisions in September -November 2014. Delete regulations that limit liquor licenses to specific zoning districts (Secs 4-34(d) and 4-34(e)) and amend the Zoning Code to provide for new facilities with alcoholic beverage service. o Zoning Code amendments include details regarding parking requirements, hours of operation and permitted/conditional uses for breweries and distilleries with on -sale drinking facilities. • Retain the current license application process (Sec 4-27, 4-28 & 4-33), fee schedule (Sec 4-29, 4-30, 4-31 & 4-32) and violation penalties (Sec. 4-102 through 4-109). Make necessary changes to coincide with other changes made to the ordinance, such as fees for new types of licenses. • Add language allowing for City enterprise facilities to apply for temporary licenses (or dispensaries) for special events. Retain requirement (Sec. 4-77(I)(b)) that limits the seating capacity located at a bar or service counter as it has been effective in encouraging restaurants instead of bars. The current 15% limitation should be reconsidered to keep in line with current industry standards. August 20, 2015 Page 2 • Retain alcohol awareness training (Sec 4-77(2)) provision. Staff believes that the 75% requirement for employee training is an effective and realistic provision. • Replace Sec. 4-77(4) that establishes maximum percentages of alcohol by volume for beer and wine with reference to Minn. Stat. § 340A.301, Subd. 29 that has similar provisions • Simplify happy hour provisions in Sec. 4-77(7) in accordance with best practice ordinances. Eliminate current language that prohibits "prizes, coupons, punch cards, games or barters" for alcohol as well as language that prohibits two-for-one sales. • Clarify process for license renewal (Sec. 4-79) in regard to any midterm change of officer. Identify flat fee for this mid-term renewal instead of current practice to escrow funds. ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE AND STEPS 1) Collect idea from community — Spring 2015 COMPLETE • 2) Summarize anticipated changes — August 2015 COMPLETE 3) Prepare first draft of new Ordinance - late August 2015 IN PROGRESS 0 4) Review of draft by impacted stakeholders - early September 2015 5) Amend draft, if needed and present to City Council — September 2015 6) Present companion zoning changes to Plan Commission — September 2015 7) Conduct public hearings and consider adoption of new ordinance — October 2015 8) New ordinance takes effect —January 2016 August 20, 2015 Page 3 • This page intentionally left blank. • is ORDINANCE NO. 2015-20 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 4 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 4-1. State Law Provisions Adopted. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A are adopted and made a part of this chapter as if fully set out herein, except as hereinafter modified. Sec. 4-2. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings given them herein: Restaurant. A business licensed by the city under the control of a single proprietor or manager having a full service kitchen when, in consideration of payment, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests. Such establishment shall have facilities for seating not less than thirty (30) guests at one time. The kitchen shall be open at all times the facility is open to the public, except that the kitchen may close no earlier than I -hour prior to closing. Sec. 4-3. License Required. A. Except as provided in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A, no person may directly or indirectly, on any pretense or by any device, sell, barter, keep for sale, charge for possession, or otherwise dispose of alcoholic beverages as part of a commercial transaction without having obtained the required license or permit. B. Holders of an on -sale intoxicating liquor license are exempt from the requirement that an on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license be obtained. Sec. 4-4. Types of Licenses. A. "On -Sale Liquor License." On -sale liquor licenses shall be issued only to those establishments allowed under Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.404, Subd. 1. On -sale liquor licenses shall permit the sale of intoxicating liquor for consumption on the premises only. First Reading September I6, 2015 Page 1 • B. "Special Club Licenses." Special on -sale licenses shall be issued only to clubs in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.404, Subdivision I. C. "On -Sale Sunday Liquor Sale License." On -sale Sunday liquor sale licenses may be issued to establishments holding an on -sale liquor license hereunder. D. "On -Sale Wine License." On -sale wine licenses may be issued for the sale of wine for consumption on the licensed premises only. An on -sale wine license may be issued only to a restaurant. The holder of an on -sale wine license who is also licensed to sell 3.2 percent malt liquors at on -sale is authorized to sell intoxicating malt liquors at on -sale without an additional license. E. "On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License." On -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor licenses shall be granted only to bona fide clubs, beer stores, restaurants and hotels where food is prepared and served for consumption on the premises. On -sale 3.2 percent liquor licenses shall permit the sale of beer for consumption on the premises only. F. "Off -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License." Off -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor licenses shall permit the sale of beer at retail, in the original package, for consumption off the premises only. G. "Cocktail Room License." Cocktail room licenses shall be issued only in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.22, Subdivision 2. 0 H. "Brew Pub License." Brew pub licenses shall be issued only in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.24. I. "Brewer Taproom License." Brewer taproom licenses shall be issued only in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.26. J. "Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License." The city council may issue a temporary on -sale license for the sale of 3.2 percent malt liquor to a club, charitable religious or nonprofit organization. The temporary license shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the council shall subscribe. Except where specifically excluded, applicants for temporary licenses shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter. K. "Temporary On -Sale Liquor Licenses." The city council may issue to: (1) a club or charitable religious or other nonprofit organization in existence for at least three years, (2) a political committee registered under Minnesota Statutes Section I OA. 14 or (3) a state university, a temporary license for the on -sale of intoxicating liquor in connection with a social event within the municipality sponsored by the licensee. a temporary license for the on -sale of intoxicating liquor in connection with a social event within the city sponsored by the licensee. The license may authorize the on -sale of intoxicating liquor for not more than four consecutive days, and may authorize on -sales on premises other than premises the licensee owns or permanently occupies. The license may provide that the licensee may contract for intoxicating liquor catering services with the holder of a full year on -sale liquor license issued by the city. The licenses are subject to First Reading September 16, 2015 Page 2 • the terms, including license fee, imposed by the city. The licenses issued under this section are subject to all laws and ordinances governing the sale of intoxicating liquor except Minnesota Statutes Sections 340A.409 and 340A.504, Subdivision 3, Paragraph (d), and the laws and ordinances which by their nature are not applicable. Temporary licenses must first be approved by the Minnesota Commissioner of Public Safety before they become valid. No more than three 4 -day, four 3 -day, or six 2 -day temporary licenses, in any combination not to exceed twelve days per year, may be issued for the sale of alcoholic beverages to any one organization or registered political committee, or for any one location, within a twelve month period. Not more than one temporary license may be issued to any one organization or registered political committee, or for any one location, within any thirty day period. Sec. 4-5. License Application. Sec. 4-5-1. Contents of Initial Application. In addition to the information which may be required by the forms of the Minnesota Commissioner of Public Safety, the applicant shall complete the application forms furnished by the city. Sec. 4-5-2. Renewal Applications. A. License Period, Expiration. Each renewal license shall be issued for a maximum • period of one (1) year. All licenses expire on April I of each year. B. Time of Making Application. Applications for the renewal of an existing license shall be made at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the expiration of the license, and shall state that everything in the prior applications remains true and correct except as otherwise indicated. Sec. 4-5-3. Execution of Application. If the application is by a natural person, it shall be signed and sworn to by such person; if by a corporation, by an officer thereof; if by a partnership, by one of the partners; if by an unincorporated association, by the operating officer or managing officer thereof. If the applicant is a partnership, the application, license and bond or insurance policy shall be made and issued in the name of all partners. It shall be unlawful to make any false statement in an application. Applications shall be filed with the city clerk. Sec. 4-6. Granting Licenses. Sec. 4-6-1. Investigation. At the time of making an initial application, renewal application, or request for a new operating officer, the applicant shall, in writing, authorize the Edina Police Department to • investigate all facts set out in the application and do a personal background and felony criminal record check on the applicant. The applicant shall further authorize the Police Department to First Reading September 16, 2015 Page 3 • release information received from such investigation to the city council. Should the city council deny the applicant's request for a license due, partially or solely, to the applicant's prior conviction of a crime, the city council shall notify the applicant in writing of the following information: A. The grounds and reasons for the denial; B. The applicable complaint and grievance procedure as set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 364.06; C. The earliest date the applicant may reapply for a license; and D. That all competent evidence of rehabilitation will be considered upon reapplication. Sec. 4-6-2. Hearing Requirements. A. Notice of Hearing. Upon receipt of the written report and recommendation by the police department, and within twenty (20) days thereafter, the clerk shall cause to be published in the official newspaper ten (10) days in advance, a notice of hearing to be held by the council, setting forth the date, time and place when the hearing will be held, the name of the applicant, the premises where the business is to be conducted, the nature of the business and such other information as the council may direct. . B. Conduct of Hearing. At the hearing, opportunity shall be given to any person to be heard for or against the granting of the license. C. Hearing on Renewal Applications. Hearings are not required on renewal applications. D. Hearing Cost. The cost of all hearings shall be borne by the applicant. E. Exempt From Hearings. The provisions of this section shall not apply to applications for: on -sale wine licenses, on- sale and off -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor licenses, or temporary licenses. Sec. 4-6-3. Granting License. After an investigation and hearing, if required, the council shall grant with or without conditions or deny the application. Sec. 4-6-4. Issuance. A. Issuance. Each license shall be issued to the applicant only. No license may be transferred to another person or to another place without the approval of the council and • without a new application having been filed. First Reading September 16, 2015 Page 4 • B. Exact Location and Size. Except in the case of a golf course, licenses shall only be issued to a space that is compact and contiguous. Each license shall be issued only for the exact rooms and square footage described in the application. C. Changes to Building. Proposed enlargement, substantial alteration which, in the city's opinion, changes the character of the establishment or extension of premises previously licensed shall be reported to the clerk at or before the time application is made for a building permit for any such change. The enlargement, substantial alteration or extension shall not be allowed for the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages unless the council approves an amendment to the liquor license. Sec. 4-6-5. Report to State. The clerk shall, within ten (10) days after the issuance of any license under this chapter, submit to the Minnesota Commissioner of Public Safety the full name and address of each person granted a license, the true name, the effective license date, and the date of expiration of the license. He/she shall also submit to the Commissioner of Public Safety any change of address, transfer, cancellation or revocation of any license by the council during the license period. Sec. 4-7. License Fees. • Sec. 4-7-I. Fees Established. A. Application Fees. The annual license application fee shall be the amount set forth in Section 2-724. When a new wine license or on -sale intoxicating liquor license is issued for a portion of a year, the annual license application fee shall be prorated at the rate of one -twelfth (1/ 12) of the license fee per month or portion of a month remaining in the license year at the time of application. B. Investigation Fees. Investigation fees shall be as follows: At the time of each original application for a license, the applicant shall pay the applicable investigation fees. For investigations conducted outside of the state, the city may recover the actual investigation costs if the costs exceed the applicable fees. Any fees due in excess of the in state investigation fee must be paid prior to the license hearing and before the city council considers the application. 2. At the time an additional investigation is required because of a change in the ownership of any license or control of a corporate license, or because of a transfer from place to place, the licensee shall pay an additional investigation fee equal to a fee for a new license. • 3. At any time that an additional investigation is required because of an enlargement, substantial alteration which, in the city's opinion, changes the character of the First Reading September 16, 201 S Page S establishment, or extension of premises previously licensed, the licensee shall pay an additional investigation fee equal to a fee for a new license. Sec. 4-7-2. Payment of Fees. The license fee for a new license shall be paid in full before the application for the license is accepted. The annual license fee for the renewal of an existing license shall be paid prior to the expiration of the existing license. Sec. 4-7-3. Refunds. No part of the fee paid for any license shall be refunded, except (1) as authorized under Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.408, (2) upon rejection of any application for reasons other than a willful misstatement in the license application, or (3) upon withdrawal of an application before approval of the issuance by the council. The license fee shall be refunded to the applicant. The investigation fee shall not be refunded. Sec. 4-7-4. Change of Ownership; Exception. Where a new application is filed as a result of incorporation by an existing licensee and the ownership control and interest in the license are unchanged, no additional investigation fee will be required. is Sec. 4-8. Conditions of License. Sec. 4-8-I. Compliance with Laws. A. City and State Laws. Every license shall be granted subject to the conditions of this chapter and of any other applicable ordinance of the city and/or state law. B. Area of License. No license shall be effective beyond the areas approved in the license for which it was granted. Sec. 4-8-2. License Year. All liquor licenses shall expire on April 1. Sec. 4-8-3. Posting License. The license shall be posted in a conspicuous place in the licensed establishment at all times. Sec. 4-8-4. Alcohol Awareness Training. A. Within thirty (30) days following the issuance of a new wine license or a new on- • sale intoxicating liquor license, not less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the employees First Reading September 16, 2015 Page 6 • authorized to serve or sell wine or liquor on the licensed premises shall have completed an alcohol awareness program approved by the police chief. B. Not less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the employees authorized to serve or sell wine or liquor on the licensed premises must complete an alcohol awareness program approved by the police chief within ninety (90) days prior to an application for license renewal for a wine license or an on -sale intoxicating liquor license. Sec. 4-8-5. Responsibility of Licensee; Hours, Orderly Conduct. Every licensee shall be responsible for the conduct of his place of business including conduct and activity of the premises attributable to the business. Sec. 4-8-6. Hours of Operation. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.504 with reference to the hours of sale are hereby adopted and made a part of this chapter as if fully set out herein. Malt liquor in growlers may also be sold at off -sale on Sunday after 8:00 A.M. Persons other than employees of the licensee may not be in the premises from thirty (30) minutes after the sale of malt liquor or intoxicating liquor is prohibited until thirty (30) minutes before the sale is permitted. Sec. 4-8-7. Beverage Restrictions. • A. No intoxicating liquor shall be sold or furnished or delivered to any obviously intoxicated person, to any known habitual drunkard, to any minor, or to any person to whom sale is prohibited by state law. B. No person shall give, sell, procure or purchase intoxicating liquor to or for any person to whom the sale of intoxicating liquor is forbidden by law. Sec. 4-8-8. Display of Liquor. No "on -sale" liquor establishment shall display liquor to the public during hours when the sale of liquor is prohibited. Sec. 4-8-9. Prohibited Conditions. A. Prostitution. No licensee shall knowingly permit the licensed premises or any room in those premises or any adjoining building directly under his control to be used for Prostitution. B. Controlled Substances. No licensee shall knowingly permit the sale, possession or consumption of controlled substances on the licensed premises in violation of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 152. • C. Gambling Prohibited. Gambling is prohibited in licensed premises. First Reading September 16, 2015 Page 7 C D. Adult Entertainment. The findings, purpose and objectives of Article IX of Chapter 12 are hereby incorporated by reference. No licensee shall permit any specified sexual activities, the presentation or display of any specified anatomical areas or the conduct of a sexually oriented business all as defined by Chapter 36 on the licensed premises or in areas adjoining the licensed premises where such activities or the conduct of such a business can be seen by patrons of the licensed premises. Sec. 4-8-10. Right of Inspection. A. Premises. Any police officer, building inspector or any properly designated officer or employee of the city shall have the unqualified right to enter, inspect and search the premises of any licensee hereunder at any time without a warrant. B. Records. The business records of the licensee, including federal and state tax returns, shall be available for inspection by the city at all reasonable times upon written request Sec. 4-8-11. Continued Validity of License. A. The licensed premises must be operated and managed by the licensee. The licensee may not allow a prospective or actual buyer to manage or operate the premises until that person is licensed. B. Licenses issued to corporations shall be valid only so long as there is no change in • the officers or ownership interest of the corporation, unless such change is approved by the council, in which event said license shall continue in force until the end of the then current license year. The requirements concerning changes in officers or ownership interest in the corporation do not apply to corporations whose stock is traded on the New York or American Stock Exchanges. C. Licenses issued to associations or partnerships shall be valid only so long as there is no change in the partnership or association agreement or in the ownership of said partnership or association unless such change is approved by the council, in which event said license shall continue in force until the end of the then current license year. D. Licensees shall submit written notice to the clerk of any such changes described herein on or before thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of any such change. Notwithstanding the definition of "interest" as given in this chapter in the case of a corporation, the licensee shall notify the clerk when a person not listed in the application acquires an interest which, together with that of a spouse, parent, brother, sister or child, exceeds five percent (5%) interest in the corporation and shall give all information about said person as is required of a person pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. E. Corporations holding licenses shall submit written notice to the city clerk of any change in operating officers at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such change. The • written notice shall designate the new operating officer and shall contain all of the information First Reading September 16, 201 S Page 8 • about said person as is required of a single applicant. The new operating officers shall be subject to the investigation required by section 4-6-1 of this chapter. Investigation fees shall be as determined by the city council pursuant to subsection 4-7-1 B of this chapter. F. The designation of a new operating officer shall not cause the corporation's license to become invalid before a decision is rendered by the city council, provided proper notice and application are made pursuant to subsection E of this section. A proposed new operating officer shall be referred to as the interim operating officer. In the event an interim operating officer is rejected by the city council, the corporation shall designate another interim operating officer and make the required application within fifteen (15) calendar days of the council's decision. In that event, a corporation shall be limited to two (2) successive interim operating officers. Sec. 4-8-12. Patio. A. The issuance of an "on -sale liquor", "special club intoxicating liquor", "on -sale wine", or "on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor" license pursuant to this code will be limited to the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages inside of a structure on the licensed premises, unless the licensee applies for and receives approval from the city council for a patio to allow the sale and consumption outside of a structure on the licensed premises. B. Definition. "Patio" means any outdoor area located on the premises used for serving food or alcohol but does not include a golf course. • C. Regulations: The patio shall not be enclosed in such a manner that the space becomes an indoor area as defined by Minnesota Statutes Section 144.413. 2. The patio shall be clearly delineated by an approved fence at least thirty- six inches (36") in height or some other approved structure or barrier that has designated openings for ingress or egress, to prevent the ingress or egress of persons to and from the patio except by way of the designated openings for ingress or egress. Such patios shall be considered compact and contiguous. Patio screening may be required if the premises is adjacent to a residential district, consistent with the fencing/screening/landscaping provisions of this code. 4. The premises shall be in compliance with the parking provisions of this code. 5. The patio shall have sufficient vehicle barriers installed to reduce the entry of vehicles into the patio if it is in direct contact with or immediately adjacent to a vehicle parking area or street. 6. The patio shall be in compliance with the noise amplification, lighting, sign, and sidewalk cafe requirements of this code. First Reading September 16, 201 S Page 9 D. Application; Site Plan. The application shall contain a detailed description and site plan of the entire premises including the following: size and seating capacity of the licensed building; proposed patio size and seating capacity including table, chair, and aisle arrangements; and fence or landscape barrier type and height. Sec. 4-9. Security. Sec. 4-9-I. Liability Insurance. All applicants for any type of intoxicating liquor, 3.2 percent malt liquor, or wine license, must, as a condition to the issuance of the license, maintenance of the license and renewal of the license, demonstrate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 340A.801 to the city. The minimum requirements for proof of financial responsibility are set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.409. The sale of alcohol is prohibited if the required insurance is not in effect. Sec. 4-9-2. Terms of Insurance Certificate. Certificates of insurance required by section 4-9-1 of this chapter shall provide that the city must be given ten (10) days' advance written notice of the cancellation of any insurance described in the certificate. Sec. 4-10. Public Character of Liquor Sales. No sales of intoxicating liquor shall be made to or in guestrooms of hotels unless the rules of such hotel provide for the service of meals in guestrooms; nor unless the sale of such intoxicating liquor is made in the manner "on -sales" are required to be made; nor unless such sale accompanies and is incidental to the regular service of meals to guests therein; nor unless the rules of such hotel and the description, location and number of such guestrooms are fully set out in the application for a license. Sec. 4-11. Persons Ineligible for License. A. State Law. No license shall be granted to or held by any person made ineligible for such a license by state law. B. Operating Officer. No license shall be granted to a corporation that does not have an operating officer who is eligible pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. C. Real Party In Interest. No license shall be granted to a person who is the spouse of a person ineligible for a license pursuant to the provisions of subsections A and B of this section or who, in the judgment of the council, is not the real party in interest or beneficial owner of the business operated, or to be operated, under the license. • • D. "Interest" Defined. The term "interest" as used in this section includes any • pecuniary interest in the ownership, operation, management or profits of a retail liquor First Reading September 16, 201 S Page 10 • establishment, but does not include: bona fide loans; bona fide fixed sum rental agreements; bona fide open accounts or other obligations held with or without security arising out of the ordinary and regular course of business of selling or leasing merchandise, fixtures or supplies to such establishment; or an interest of ten percent (10%) or less in any corporation holding a city liquor license. A person who receives monies from time to time directly or indirectly from a licensee in the absence of a bona fide consideration therefor and excluding bona fide gifts or donations, shall be deemed to have a pecuniary interest in such retail license. In determining "bona fide", the reasonable value of the goods or things received as consideration for the payment by the licensee and all other facts reasonably tending to prove or disprove the existence of any purposeful scheme or arrangement to evade the prohibitions of this section shall be considered. E. Outstanding Debts. No license shall be granted or renewed for operation on any premises on which real estate taxes, assessments, or other financial claims of the city or of the state are due, delinquent, or unpaid. If an action has been commenced pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 278 Minnesota Statutes, questioning the amount or validity of taxes, the council may, on application by the licensee, waive strict compliance with this provision; no waiver may be granted, however, for taxes, or any portion thereof, which remain unpaid for a period exceeding one year after becoming due unless such one year period is extended through no fault of the licensee. Sec. 4-12. Restrictions Involving Persons Under the Legal Drinking Age. Sec. 4-112- 1. Prohibited Acts. A. No Sale To Persons Under The Legal Drinking Age. No licensee, agent or employee shall serve or dispense upon the licensed premises any intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquors to a person under the legal drinking age; nor shall such licensee, or his/her agent or employee, permit any such person to be furnished or consume any such liquors on the licensed premises; nor shall such licensee, his/her agent or employee, permit any such person to be delivered any such liquors. B. Delivery To Persons Under The Legal Drinking Age. No persons under the legal drinking age shall receive delivery of intoxicating liquor. Sec. 4-12-2. Misrepresenting Age. No person under the legal drinking age shall misrepresent his/her age for the purpose of obtaining intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor, nor shall he/she enter any premises licensed for the retail sale of intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor for the purpose of purchasing or having served or delivered to him/her for consuming any such intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor, nor shall any such person purchase, attempt to purchase, consume or have another person purchase for him/her any intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor, except that a person under the age of twenty-one (2 1 ) years may purchase or attempt to purchase an alcoholic beverage if under the supervision of a responsible person over the age of twenty-one (2 1 ) for training,' education, or research purposes. First Reading September 16, 2015 Page I I 0 Sec. 4-12-3. Identification Requirements: A. Identification Required. Any person shall, upon demand of the licensee, his/her employee or agent, produce and permit to be examined (1) a valid driver's license or identification card issued by Minnesota, another state, or a province of Canada, and including the photograph and date of birth of the licensed person, (2) a valid military identification card issued by the United States Department of Defense, (3) a valid passport issued by the United States, (4) a valid instructional permit issued under Minnesota Statutes section 171.05 to a person of legal age to purchase alcohol which includes a photograph and the date of birth of the person issued the permit, or (5) in the case of a foreign national, a valid passport. B. Prima Facie Evidence. In every prosecution for a violation of the provisions of this section 4-12 relating to the sale or furnishing of intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt beverages to persons under the legal drinking age, and in every proceeding before the council with respect thereto, the fact that the person involved has obtained and presented to the licensee, his/her employee or agent, a driver's license, passport, or nonqualification certificate issued by the department of public safety, from which it appears that said person was not under the legal drinking age and was regularly issued such identification card, shall be prima facie evidence that the licensee, his/her agent or employee is not guilty of a violation of such a provision and shall be conclusive evidence that a violation, if one has occurred, was not willful or intentional. Sec. 4-13. Revocation or Suspension of License. Sec. 4-13-1. Grounds for Suspension or Revocation. The council may suspend or revoke any license for the sale of intoxicating or 3.2 percent malt liquor for any of the following reasons: A. False or misleading statements made on a license application or renewal, or failure to abide by the commitments, promises, or representations made to the city council. B. Violation of any special conditions (e.g., restrictions on entertainment) under which the license was granted, including, but not limited to, the timely payment of real estate taxes, and all other charges. C. Violation of any state or federal law regulating the sale of intoxicating liquor, 3.2 percent malt liquor, or controlled substance. D. Creation of a nuisance on the premises or in the surrounding area. E. That the licensee suffered or permitted illegal acts upon the licensed premises or on property owned or controlled by the licensee adjacent to the licensed premises, unrelated to the sale of intoxicating liquor or 3.2 percent malt liquor. F. That the licensee had knowledge of illegal acts upon or attributable to the licensed . premises, but failed to report the same to the police. First Reading September 16, 201 S Page 12 • • G. Expiration or cancellation of any required insurance, or failure to notify the city within a reasonable time of changes in the term of the insurance or the carriers. Sec. 4-13-2. Presumptive Civil Penalties. A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish a standard by which the council shall determine the length of license suspensions and the propriety of revocations. This chapter shall apply to all premises licensed under this chapter and the penalties herein shall be presumed to be appropriate. The council may deviate from the presumptive penalty when it finds that there exists extenuating or aggravating reasons to deviate, including, but not limited to a licensee's efforts, in combination with the state or the city, to prevent the sale of alcohol to minors. When deviating from these standards, the council shall provide written findings supporting the penalty selected. B. Hearing Notice. No sanction under this chapter shall take effect until the licensee has been given the opportunity for a hearing to be held in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.415 and the Administrative Procedures Act Sections 14.57 to 14.69. The council may appoint a hearing examiner or may conduct a hearing itself. The hearing notice shall be given at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing, include notice of the time and place of the hearing, and state the nature of the charges against the licensee. For first violations, for which the presumptive penalty is a fine, the licensee may, at any time prior to the hearing, pay the fine and waive the right to a hearing. C. Presumptive Penalties For Violations: Type of Violation I st Violation 2nd Violation 3rd Violation 4th Violation Commission of a Revocation N/A N/A N/A felony related to the licensed activity Sale of alcoholic Revocation N/A/ N/A/ N/A beverages while license is under suspension Adult entertainment Revocation N/A/ N/A/ N/A Sale of intoxicating Revocation N/A/ N/A/ N/A liquor where only licensed for 3.2 percent malt liquor Refusal to allow city $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation N/A inspectors or police fine and 3- fine and 7 - admission to inspect day day premises suspension suspension Sale of alcoholic $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation beverages to underage fine and 3- fine and 7 - First Reading September 16, 2015 Page 13 • person day day suspension suspension After/before hours $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation sale of alcoholic fine and 3- fine and 7 - beverage day day suspension suspension After hours $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation consumption of fine and 3- fine and 7 - alcoholic beverages day day suspension suspension Gambling or $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation prostitution on fine and 3- fine and 7 - premises day day suspension suspension Failure to take $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation reasonable steps to fine and 3- fine and 7 - stop person from day day leaving premises with suspension suspension alcoholic beverage Sale of alcoholic $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation beverage to obviously fine and 3- fine and 7 - intoxicated person day day suspension suspension Allowing a disorderly $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation establishment fine and 3- fine and 7 - day day suspension suspension Person under 18 $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $2,000.00 Revocation serving liquor fine and 3- fine and 7 - day day suspension suspension Failure to display Warning $500.00 fine $1,000.00 $1,500.00 liquor license letter fine fine D. Other Penalties. When a violation of this chapter or an applicable statute, ordinance, or rule regarding alcoholic beverages is without a presumptive penalty, the penalty shall be determined by the council. E. Multiple Violations. At a licensee's first appearance before the council, the council must act upon all of the violations that have been alleged in the notice sent to the licensee. The council shall consider the presumptive penalty for each violation under the first appearance column in this chapter. The occurrence of multiple violations is grounds for deviation from the presumed penalties in the council's discretion. F. Subsequent Violations. A violation occurring after the notice of hearing has been mailed, but prior to the hearing, must be treated as a separate violation and dealt with as a 0 First Reading September 16, 20I S Page 14 • second appearance before the council, unless the licensee agrees in writing to add the violation to the first appearance. The same procedure applies to the second, third or fourth appearance. G. Subsequent Appearances. Upon a second or subsequent appearance before the council by the same licensee, the council shall impose the presumptive penalty for the violation or violations giving rise to the particular violation or violations that were the subject of the prior appearance. However, the council may consider the amount of time elapsed between appearances as a basis for deviating from the presumptive penalty imposed by this chapter. H. Computation of Violations. Any violation which has occurred within twenty-four (24) months of the current violation shall be counted. 2. Nothing in this chapter shall restrict or limit the authority of the council to: a. Suspend a license up to sixty (60) days; b. Revoke the license; C. Impose a civil fee not to exceed $2,000.00; • d. Impose conditions on a license; or e. Take any other action in accordance with law; provided that the licensee has been afforded an opportunity for a hearing in the manner provided under this chapter. Sec. 4-15. Open House Parties. Sec.4-15-I. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this Section, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Alcoholic beverage means any beverage containing more than one-half of one percent of alcohol by volume. Control means the right of possession of a residence or premises. Controlled substance means any drug, substance or immediate precursor so defined in Minnesota Statutes § 152.01. • First Reading September 16, 2015 Page 15 • Open house party means a social gathering of persons at a residence or premises. A social gathering attended only by the owners, or those with rights of possession of the residence or premises, or their immediate family members, shall not be considered an open house party for purposes of this chapter. Person under the legal drinking age of 21 years means a person not legally permitted by reason of age to possess alcoholic beverages pursuant to the provisions of this Code and state law. Residence or premises means a home, apartment, condominium, hotel room, premises, or other dwelling unit or meeting room or hall, whether occupied on a temporary basis or permanent basis, whether occupied as a dwelling or for a social function, owned, rented, leased or under the control of any person or persons including the curtilage of such residence or premises. Sec. 4-15-2. Acts prohibited. No person having control of any residence or premises shall allow an open house party to take place at the residence or premises if any alcoholic beverage is possessed or consumed at the open house party by any person under the legal drinking age of 21 years or any controlled substance is possessed or consumed at the open house party. Section 2. This ordinance is effective January 1, 2016. • First Reading. Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk • First Reading September 16, 2015 Page 16 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VII.D. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion x❑ Date: September 16, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Sketch Plan Review— NW Corner of 66th Street and Xerxes Action Requested: Provide non-binding comments regarding the proposed Sketch Plan. Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 5.6 acre parcel at 6550 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings and redevelop the site with the following two phase development: Phase 1 (3250 66`h Street West): ➢ A 6-7 story, 230 -unit apartment building. Six floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. Phase 2 (6650 Xerxes Avenue): ➢ A 5-6 story, 145 -unit apartment building. Five and four floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. The primary entrance to the site would be off Xerxes Avenue. There is a secondary access available off of York. Both of these access points exist today. There is a shared access arrangement with the adjacent property owner at 3316 66th Street west. That shared access would also remain. To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Re -guiding of the site from RM, Regional Medical to CAC, Community Activity Center. The proposed height (7 stories) and density (66 units per acre) would meet the standards of the CAC. A rezoning of all the property to PUD, Planned Unit Development is requested. Planning Commission Consideration: On August 26, 2015, the Planning Commission considered the sketch plan proposal. (See attached minutes.) ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes from the August 26, 2015 Edina Planning Commission meeting • Planning Commission Memo, August 26, 2015 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF MEMO City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 �,, Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com e ', cp �O ,aee Date: August 26, 2015 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — NW Corner of 66th Street and Xerxes The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 5.6 acre parcel at 6550 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West. (See property location on pages A1— A3.) The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings and redevelop the site with the following two phase development: Phase 1 (3250 66th Street West): ➢ A 6-7 story, 230 -unit apartment building. Six floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. Phase 2 (6650 Xerxes Avenue): ➢ A 5-6 story, 145 -unit apartment building. Five and four floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. See plans and narrative on pages A6 -A24. The primary entrance to the site would be off Xerxes Avenue. There is a secondary access available off of York. Both of these access points exist today. There is a shared access arrangement with the adjacent property owner at 3316 66th Street west. That shared access would also remain. To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Re -guiding of the site from RM, Regional Medical to CAC, Community Activity Center. The proposed height (7 stories) and density (66 units per acre) would meet the standards of the CAC. A rezoning of all the property to PUD, Planned Unit Development is requested. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO �911.IA, �1 En • ,M1�bRM)SNT� � This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. (See page A15.) The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. A study is currently underway in this area as part of the Planning Commission's work plan. The France Avenue Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant. They have been asked to address each of the principles with any formal application. (See principles on pages A25 -A27.) This corner is seen as a Gateway into the Southdale Area from the north and east. (See the Southdale and the corresponding CAC area on page A5.) Therefore, re -guiding the corner to the same land use designation as all the uses south of 66th Street would seem appropriate. Staff would also recommend re -guiding the three small adjacent sites at 6444, 6500 and 6525 Xerxes to CAC as part of this request. (See page A3.) The compliance table below demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the current zoning of POD -3, Planned Office District: * Variance or would require change to PUD ** Council may approve subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation. and podium height— 2008 Comprehensive Plan City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard POD Proposed Buildinq Setbacks Front — 66" 75+ feet 20-30 feet* Street/Xerxes 75+ feet 30+/- feet* Side — West 65+ feet 5+/ -feet* Side - East 65-75+ feet 80 — 15+/ --feet* Rear — North Building Height 12 stories 6-7 stories Maximum Floor Area Ratio 1.5% 1.6%** FAR) Density 80 units per acre for senior 66 housing (Regional Medical designation) Parking Stalls 375 enclosed (residential) 575 enclosed stalls proposed 38 surface (1 stall per bedroom) Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance or would require change to PUD ** Council may approve subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation. and podium height— 2008 Comprehensive Plan City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO 49jN�,l� oe��� o • !1�RPOPAS£9 IBBB The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the sites. TRAFFIC/SITE ACCESS A traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. AFFORDABLE HOUSING The applicant is not proposing any affordable housing as part of this project. Given housing policy under consideration by the City Council; this project should be required to provide affordable housing consistent with the policy or 20% of the units designated for affordable housing. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN As part of any formal application sustainable design should be included. PUD The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses, d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 UMUTU, �1 ow e Y O • �M1�bAPo:V`�� �s80 e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development, h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposed project would incorporate some of the items noted above. Affordable housing and sustainable design should be addressed. Elements that are included would be high quality building design, pedestrian oriented design; underground parking, close proximity of housing to transit, retail area and jobs, which could result in less dependence of the automobile for residents, housing within a mixed use area; mixture of podium height at the street; activity along the street. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • • i Pamela Park? :: T- <TFrri •;, Lsl o _ TATE H i n a,iv c.F w E f 777 HFFi T•;i,F f f h•c -' n — x -i T•.: _. i F G•_T FEET a•;E!.I � yL U:7- -` :- "- - [JTH _(i;EFT '..T i.dTli 5;1 F. -T I Park _ ,Tn ST;;FFT o, 53 = Tlu -I1'F F.T EST JI sT Crit iI All t- -:TH Tr FET',�„T i - L':Iq Fir L T!> - o 1— 11F.EET EST - - - 71ST °I f4FT., F51 L':7 1`11D AR ET V i':7 r,. EF:1 t.i PIA,I - - 1 FCGi '_f'.'i q: LL wF 31'.R. _ — Parcel 29.028-24-24-0005 A -T -B: Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N ID: Print Date: 8/19/2015 Owner Market 3250 West 66Th Street Lic $ Name: i Total: Parcel 3250 66Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Commercial -Non Preferred Sale T Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation orwarranty expressed or Non -Homestead Date: implied, including fitness of any particular stead: purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 2.46 acres Sale Area: 107,352 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 , , "hirrk- Green.I L' • • • • r: Cy40= 4 1 `* .r Q r� 15TFEET EST •r 1 �1 � � 3 6 '49 ' 65L , W7 1 x CJI �; •�� i Y - s _' z tiLiiHC!tilE E11TtF; _°I'li�1t ' `-' E+ R1 s, Vr_ 66cU a t tR _ _ t ' M1 Parcel 29.028-24-24-0005 A -T -B: Abstract ID: Owner Market 3250 West 66Th Street Llc Name: { Total: Parcel 3250 66Th St W ( Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Commercial -Non Preferred Sale Type: Price: Sal stead: Non -Homestead Date: Parcel 2.46 acres i Sale Area: 107,352 sq ft i! Code: �a Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. N Print Date: 8/19/2015 )V This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A "MinkGreenl • • • � t ie 6' 6 "' 642•_ / a 643 - z � 6 • �. 'Al. F 644 v �J4- _ rte, i IfWL m 'j T w _'I 1' 1 "may � �_ I "�. f -� ?��y� ;,•ISA -�1� �i ��.I 'v - - - -,111 , _425 Parcel 200 ft. N 29-028-24-24-0005 q_T_g; Map Scale: 1" = ID: Print Date: 8/19/2015 Owner 3250 West 66Th Street Llc Market W Name: Total: Parcel 3250 66Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: b hSt V Property Commercial -Non Preferred Sale COw► �" `A �mM Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from v nous sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Non -Homestead implied, including fitness of any particular stead: Date: purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 2.46 acres Sale Area: 107,352 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A 'MinkGreenf A3 =E 0 0 C: • ------ ----- ---- —/ o Q j ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business ' �° 2008 Comprehensive Plan Figure 4.4 e r� Cit of Edina City Conceptual Land Use Framework: 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Potential Areas of Change Date of Aerial Photography: August 2006 I—ISIS? 0 0.5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4-33 SIIf- • • m a E • Legend Future Land Use Plan with BuildingHeights City of Edina 9 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update southeast Quadrant Figure 4.66 Data Source: URS 0 0.5 Miles O c • • A P p I Icaw� Residential Redevelopment at 66t" &YORK Edina, MN Sketch Plan Review August 12, 2015 Project Narrative Developer: DLC Residential, LLC 21500 Biscayne Blvd. Aventura, FL 33180 Local Minnesota Office: 5245 Wayzata Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Rich Kauffman, 612.325.9767 Prepared by: Elness Swenson Graham Architects (ESG) Dennis Sutliff, AIA, AICP, 612.373.4624 Kimley-Horn Luke Payne, 507.216.6210 A N #\ ffJI J C A. DEVELOPER Since 2004, DLC Residential has been developing and constructing income properties in the strongest emerging markets across the United States with over 4,000 completed units. By focusing on integrity, cost controls and careful market research, DLC Residential has created tangible assets and real cash flow resulting in viable investments and industry-leading returns. B. REQUESTED ACTIONS While this is a Sketch Plan review and no formal action is being requested at this time, as this project moves through the Entitlement Process, we anticipate the following actions will be required: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) • Site Plan Approval • Others TBD The development applications for 66th & York Residential Redevelopment Plan will follow the following proposed approval schedule: Introductory Meeting with City Staff August 4, 2015 Completed Sketch Plan Review — Planning Commission August 26, 2015 Concept Plan Review—City Council September 1, 2015 A� Neighborhood Meeting TBD Kick -Off Meeting with City Staff TBD Additional Staff meetings TBD Formal Application TBD P Q� Included in this submittal are the following: • • Twenty copies of this Project Narrative. • Twenty copies of Preliminary Plans and 3-D images d< C. PROJECT LOCATION The project site lies in the north-west quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and West 66th Street. As such, it is a "Gateway Site" to the France Avenue, Southdale Area and responds to many of the Working Principles that have been put forward as goals for future development for that area. D. PROPERTY The project site is currently platted as three lots totaling 264,250 square feet or 5.65 acres in total E. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Residential Redevelopment at 66th & York will be accomplished in two Phases. Phase I will occur on Parcel 2 and 3 and will consist of a 230 unit rental apartment building and two levels of underground parking. The existing Titus Building will remain in place on Parcel 1 until Phase II is commenced. Phase II will include the demolition of the Titus Building and the construction of a second rental apartment building containing 145 units and two levels of underground parking. Phase II will complete the composition of two buildings on the combined sites. In doing so, it will transform the current auto -centric office development characterized by surface parking lots one, fully integrating site with well-defined open spaces, pedestrian features and on site amenities. The majority of the apartment units will be one, one -plus and two bedrooms. There will be a small number of Studio/Alcove apartments and a small number of three bedroom apartments. 66`x' & York Page 2� � August 12, 2015 Sketch Plan Review Two levels of underground parking will be reserved for the residents. Surface parking will serve their guests. The preliminary metrics for this development, broken out by phase are contained in the • table at the end of this narrative. As this Sketch Plan submittal is preliminary in nature, the floor areas, unit mix and the parking counts may change as the result of future design refinements. F. VISION AND PUBLIC PURPOSE DLC Residential is proposing to produce exactly the kind of vital, transformative and precedent - setting, redevelopment at the corner of 66th and York that is envisioned by City's Working Principles for the France Avenue, Southdale Area District. The vision for 66' & York is to begin the transformation of this site by bringing 24/7 life and vitality to what is currently a traditional, auto - oriented, single use, office environment. 66th & York will strive to upgrade the pedestrian environment of its site surrounding public realm in a manner which can be emulated throughout the remainder of the district in the future. It will provide new options for the emerging residential markets and 21St century lifestyles that are needed by Edina to remain an attractive home for the community's next generation of citizens. It will create a one -of -a -kind, luxury residential community that is short supply today. This is a unique opportunity that many municipalities actively seek when soliciting redevelopment proposals. This redevelopment will address the objectives of the France Avenue, Southdale Area District and benefit the residents and visitors of Edina, adjacent property owners and tenants in the following ways: • Land Use. City staff delivered a strong message. They believe this redevelopment project should be a "precedent setter" in the Southdale area. It should point the way to how this entire district can be redeveloped as a new, walkable neighborhood of higher density uses, high quality architecture and attractive pedestrian features. • Artful Building Design. 66th and York is a "foreground" site within the District. As such, the design of the improvements on this site demands a presence and creativity that is commensurate with its prominent position in the District. While the buildings must function efficiently, they will fulfill their role as Foreground buildings with creatively sculpted profiles and massing and with high quality materials. The primary street frontages are animated with dramatic by step -backs, terraces and greened roof edges. Indoor and outdoor spaces containing "human Activity" are located on exterior and interior street fronts. Linear elements of the building facades are punctuated with projecting masses that alternate back �• and forth across the landscaped interior streetscape. Inviting Public Realm. A creative approach to the shaping the spaces between buildings is a key element of successful residential communities. This is especially true at 66th & York %h which cannot be characterized today as being "pedestrian -friendly." When complete, 66th & l*rk will a great variety of outdoor rooms and spaces. The very busy and energetic York N #venue Q G1 street front capped by activity spaces at each end will be defined by 3-dimensional pedestrian improvements along is length. This will create a pedestrian friendliness that G�0 does not exist today and will define the site's outer edge. It will also help to calm the interior of the site. Once inside, residents and guests will experience no fewer than five distinct outdoor spaces — including the paver -rich, parking court. These spaces are shaped by the building masses, each with its own unique scale and character. The interior street with its parallel parking, benches and pedestrian -scaled light fixtures will create calm and inviting central spine with a true residential character. • Land Use: Live -able Precincts. Positioned within France Avenue, Southdale Area District, 66th & York will provide a dramatic example of how the Area can be redeveloped into a more walkable, pedestrian friendly and interconnected neighborhood with greater levels of the live -work amenities our emerging, 21St century lifestyles demand. It will be transformative to this section of the District. The current auto -oriented land use dominated 66t° & York Page 3�j August 12, 2015 Sketch Plan Review J� by surface parking will become a greened oasis with the automobiles relegated to underground status. Only the bare minimum of guest parking and street -side parking will remain on the surface. G. MARKET POSITION DLC Residential is proposing 375 apartment units in two buildings. This new community will be positioned at the upper end of the rental market, complete with high-end interior finishes, 10 foot ceilings and extensive indoor and outdoor amenities. The majority of the apartments will be one and two bedroom homes but approximately 15 to 20% will have additional alcove, den or other "bonus" rooms. And there will be handful of smaller, studio style apartments. In addition, the top floors of both buildings may house a few larger penthouse style units for folks who wish to live in more spacious and luxurious quarters. As a new and "modern" rental community, residents of 66th & York will enjoy amenities, conveniences and vistas currently not widely available in this community. Unobstructed views, elevated amenity terraces, rooftop gardens are all features that currently rare in existing rental communities. As is true in other communities developed by DLC Residential, residents will have large windows and generous balconies. Those in some upper level units will enjoy larger, walk -out terraces, some wrapping the corners of their apartments. Residential amenities will include heated and secure parking, elevated outdoor pools and spas, terraces furnished with grills, lounge areas, and a fire pit. Indoor club rooms and a fitness centers, all of which open onto the terraces will be available for socializing with other residents, for parties with family and friends or for quiet individual use. On- site professional management will be provided to all residents and their guests. �J H. LAN DSCAPING/STREETSCAPING 4Ibeit they are not designed yet, the landscape and streetscape improvements for this site will 0enhance the dynamic architectural character of this residential redevelopment. Further, they will respond to the Working Principles of the France Avenue, Southdale Area objectives. They will provide ovide and promote an attractive, safe and welcoming environment through the use of traditional ��� Onting materials, green wall and roof features, paving materials and site amenities appropriate to •dry the nsidential use. The landscape and streetscape design will reflect the following goals: Q P�� • 4F Include Sustainable Design features. 3�k Create a pedestrian friendly, public streetfront and interior environment that does not exist today. G • Convey a Sense of Security and Welcome. I. PARKING This redevelopment proposes to provide 575 reserved, enclosed and secure parking stalls in its two underground garages. This equates to one parking space for bedroom within the development plus 50 extra stalls which may be reserved for residents who may wish to have addition parking available. Thirty eight surface parking spaces in the landscaped auto court and parallel spaces on the internal street will serve the residents' guests and visitors to the leasing office. J. SITE CIRCULATION and TRAFFIC Access to the site occurs at three locations, a right in -right out movement at mid -block at the York/661h confluence, at the existing York Avenue driveway on the north, and by way of a cross - 661b & York Page 4 August 12, 2015 Sketch Plan Review • • 0 easement agreement through the parking lot on the property to the west. That same cross - easement agreement results in a driveway over Parcels 2 and 3 allowing access to/from the adjacent site to the west. City staff has raised the possibility of closing the free -right turn lane from York to 66th Street. If this were to occur, the pedestrian environment along York could be enhanced further. K. STORM WATER This development is located within the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. As such, it will ultimately comply with their requirements for rate, volume and water quality. Presumably, this site will incorporate an underground storm water vault or cellular system. It is our intention to provide a visual clue to this sustainable and common sense storm water solution at the landscaped "cistern -garden" in the auto court. 66' & York Sketch Plan Review Page 5 A 1 0 August 12, 2015 Revised August 12, 2015 edness Swenson graham architects inc. MEMORANDUM RE: 661h & YORK Residential Redevelopment PHASE PHASE II TOTAL Site Area Parcels 2 and 3 Parcel 1 3.07 ac. 2.58 ac. 5.65 ac. 133,676 sf 112,574 sf 246,250 sf New Residential Development Building Area 243,800 gsf 153,700 397,500 sf Residential FAR 1.82 1.37 1.61 • Number of Units 230 145 375 Number of Bedrooms 320 205 525 Residential Density (Units/acre) 74.9 56.2 66.4 Building Height 6 floors over parking 5/4 floors over parking Steps at 4 and 2 floors Steps at 4 and 2 floors 68 feet 56 feet Surface Parking, Residential 29 cars 9 cars 38 cars Secure Parking 350 cars 225 cars 575 cars Total Residential Parking 379 cars 234 cars 613 cars Parking Ratio 1/bedroom + 59 1/bedroom + 29 1/bedroom + 88 cars Existing Office Building Building Area 62,079 sf na. a64�G� na. Surface Parking -Parcel 1 150 cars na. �Q� �� h na. Surface Parking -Parcel 3 72 cars Secure Parking 28 cars (est.) Total parking 250 cars �O • Parking Ratio 4.03 cars/1,000 sf na. na. 500 Washington avenue south • suite 1080 - minneapolis, mn 55415 • p: 612.339.5508 - f: 612.339.5382 - www.esgarchitects.com an equal opportunityempioyer All F. st Iik�AM rs5.,.. 1 ,N■�■ �tlns-^�� ■..� f P,I I �� � "', � r����p� ��. - � raI il�� ■ ��� �1 ��ee�� ��� ee�r,� eac�. • �.y�� a �I 1Ol1 �" y v, ■ I I ,I 'I i1 II- 1 •ce�e.'�. eaaa. .. u rl i L L �r � -■ � ■ i SRVr ailr _ Vid �Jrlv®i rrrnf lrrv(*ir p OIs IFA mi VAOILv's rA ara Igoo N, ,n�sA.. .� • �. , ��y:« � fir t^.. P D • C] • A 1 1"AM f ,• • Ir , I ' •I 1 I� A13 Nt v� L Q 1 O to N ■ e••lnc_----— �„-wn•�=wsv_nmors----Mvu[xmhrc----- ___--__--_--_ I 1 __ --------------- ---_ _✓____ — ——�,Ti1'W Ns 3�____.._ _ _— — I Nt°ma cw sa•u II I� –44 3_�rcF1F. 16x —4 A -------------- ------------� i swmr¢n [ov[nmrx 'O �1-- —_—___ -____________________________-----_---_____—__--____--- �M/BUC ROAD) _ _ _ swrr. a.- m ol; cAss+x wnors 1 –is .rswm`r em`n"wai vxnor. ,. Sketch Plan Review D L C R E J I D E 1\1 T I A L 2015 August 12th Y1O1•^ WI .9 Hwr. L•rera ElggMg: mrA+rt" IXL' nws PER CYItIMNMENr Na ORTE]IrJG6: 811 or ca11811.eo vnnrz r.or r J >^ nwmn.. m • cs..rlm.m xm commm crwm wboca ovrc,•r.n •no.°x"a .rKKm. saeoi• ornra+roy zi� nu` i�oo a+'rr NCINITY MAP zJ . ns reeww Fm"yner a,mazmwr Aanor (rruAA r • we' r wro+r, ras .rrnx z x (NOT TO SCALE) z�.w ear ver a• m. an.nnn+ mmc. mw'•el w ruu ..m,m•mer ro++ w� �e�E aareJ srorwn6..., zaa. JJ s, afJm (zss.zsg ev�w%• rwr) nwc+ J cn,r.x,. nn: e•.. (�a evr saa-. rrgJ YJ m ykcao ov gr �mn.. ug oonxg nmx n m .ntn "• nmmsmxe nems me Jr a• g.) 5r• Atlm•ee•..lTsn W. 6ern srner me Ysso r"t avenue S Femu +x. �� � Fxcwncws aR carWrNFNr Na cwrn�rxa T—Ir eJ [. r" � ,r...r lar .. 4avgM.. +u w.xmr��r�• _ r re...... aJJ4�se�rr,i "s..r", s. nrov.."r'Mrs„�.,"axummrxe. .4ww(2 (910W OV �rc1J[ea•%.°iwaM r"� •"";:� "'°n.".n'°,:::;=r... r'snw'w aw.m r,,, xm.w.., ..u...m e, nr� a.M o.ro R.. v.J �.�pYr a em,Yr"1 ro m.r a"rw ...a... . ."mr -1 12, ,nm ., —r LEcwD �m x.,,w [.mw +*....r, r..°arm. n. TmY .• ne<...,, xo. Yrwra ¢w.i iior mw a wrw...,w c 5 w. rz,.x 1q aamn+xwraF a Rnnaam roFr Pa59&E ENcnaAWN£N)s .ry roxrn Pc� r.) mm. eve me.a..w wT•" m w •.x rm+r. "... v...r z. a/ rs m+. � nro rorc -•- '4GN-r"s�A'wY IEGAL OEYGRPnCW PR cgAMnIDIT N0. aRTFIII.IBe; O usr,ros xo".nxr Is grgy" F P�+r. � rw.awwA.mr, Oa nuw�am ms or w+ sem sin.i ri'i,. rn i ee r.., w.e., r"m••'r"y <.r m..,«.,• x.rn ae rn. rr" , 6 xrovwr vert eox .emrm.r nw•'r iX srxrr urz � wxnsevczo eAnxme r s swrn x m• sewn w •r nw•n• xML oav, a. xw rras x+ m.wL " s � rarto[xMrusurac =a,m + m. Y.•m rs. „Tm+.«p r'�;i°�..,wr. a..... ,...,,r. 1, 1= r�ara;r. X sVR1ErcwY LIXMGIf �e � x•.. m,�. �a: m A.mk.xa.m nm x_a" [ 1w ,� .� Ryan companies U.S, Inc. RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH &YORK Edina, MN ar. 10/24/2014 Casin's OUtlots LTA/A Land e 14..o' 4.s . , o PHASE 1 PARKING GARAGE ACCESS ■Sketch Plan Review 2015 August 12th DLC RES! D[ N T I A L PI'S► PAR* RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH &YORK Edina, MN • PHASE 1 PARKING GARAGE PHASE 2 PARKING GARAGE PHASE 2 LOBBY/ENTRANCE LEASING OFFICE FITNESS PHASE 2 PARKING GARAGE ACCESS RAIN GARDERN / STORM WATER CISTERN PEDESTRIAN ARCADE PHASE 1 LOBBY/ENTRANCE LEASING OFFICE FITNESS Q/ mow o� ti PARKING LEVEL ■ Sketch Plan Review LEVEL 1 Sketch August 12th D L C I .\ E S I D ILL N! T I A L 66TH & YORK Edina, MN C� '> • ROOF TERRACE I SET- BACKS AT LEVELS 1, 2 & 4 Sketch Plan Review D LC RES I D E 11\1 T I A I_ RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 2015 August 12th 66TH &YORK Edina, MN ROOF TERRACE I SET- BACKS AT LEVELS 1, 2 & 4 LEVEL 2-6 SIMILIAR L` • W 0 LL1 r N so °o Q "I Zit ❑ baJ' z < � w O Y Z C7 O YZH z 0,y U /� Q�� LU ❑ C) rOmW z 0 w wzWa r—CD u) c7 a��� w}zcn v�m�QQw z = X W Q m o W t O aWOw a-jJLL L` • W 0 LL1 r — " i"d N,I'� I 111 I II I ZI - iz...: — 5'� � � ��� p:e'Y3 � �! ,.i��f1.r••-mmR z . �, ,7�.,1 �1�� I�I.;II, n. , —.I� � II �I ���a��•��f ate" � ; ,Ie4nnp[xi®'�•0 r � � s�' i hsr `{i b x. I + 1�ri.. ■ I�i..� '�'��G` e� n• ■r•! 1lei� �' Rxs' j c ;:• 1 I�u■F+J1,■ s. II eeep■ll�Ap"� -gyp,sj•i■e iv:.r„i '- al• ��■ �t�'!{�� �1.�r1�4 __ II ( '` it AIL`vIIA. . .■1 �a(e(Iea.�. �11 - ++�,_ ■ens. �■ o fiCr ___- A'- L�� 'I�I.+ �GI �+�IlC. ti�ii : nniCGil Iy� .1Il nh,■ilYy�(a■rl.ii6 �� . - -_ �..'!0 - r +liiml'.•NO a II ..1_U' In pG I p a■1(' i Llia 4 _ !�I I IC �cceo a ' QUa, y 1 1_ I I's L� yl■is It • I+-- ..art—�`�I �I I i I��se�.. � ■� .� at. ,s• p0 � _ ■ _ I'_ �nnll�t� _ � ���� '�r�-0 ���f � • ry ;�' � `I' � ' 1� � ■ �e__ u � �IL't. " ■ •�-d^ s ' � � `r _ � ���e"' n■en I �I� Vii+ ri 1- - -LW m l� �I �. ......E ^' •• t I ®■ . I�� "pill I i ��Uil, rir I�■I [An Mo EmillVI_ I loll ;. _— '! tib` � ,��� � � �;. C� (,�■ I�� a 11� LI : �'L�,u i�+ � gra I rG�im Imamo T ._ -x . •. r,� -i AM � amar 'Mr o- l Vi i�4__� ' :y n ail gra I rG�im F. Sketch Plan Review -13�-�! iL. r A [.r �� n .. ��i©®® , -Imo- - f� �p y • — r Rigl"I ' T Pao®�� �lo� �� °' r.All NOME i! 40 may{ - -T - r .._ WNW 0 • j s 1Sketch Plan Review 2015Augusti2th DLC RESIDEI\ITIAL RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH &YORK Edina, MN �� 12 • j s RE: 66th & YORK Residential Redevelopment PHASEI PHASEII Site Area Parcels 2 and 3 Parcel 1 3.07 ac. 2.58 ac. 133,676 sf 112,574 sf New Residential Development Building Area 243,800 gsf 153,700 Residential FAR 1.82 1.37 Number of Units 230 145 Number of Bedrooms 320 205 Residential Density (Units/acre) 74.9 56.2 Building Height 6 floors over parking 5/4 floors over parking Steps at 4 and 2 floors Steps at 4 and 2 floors 68 feet 56 feet Surface Parking, Residential 29 cars 9 cars Secure Parking 350 cars 225 cars Total Residential Parking 379 cars 234 cars Parking Ratio 1/bedroom + 59 1/bedroom + 29 Existing Office Building Building Area 62,079 sf na. Surface Parking -Parcel 1 150 cars na. Surface Parking -Parcel 3 72 cars Secure Parking 28 cars (est.) Total parking 250 cars Parking Ratio 4.03 cars/1,000 sf na. TOTAL 5.65 ac. 246,250 sf 397,500 sf 1.61 375 525 66.4 38 cars 575 cars 613 cars 1/bedroom+88 cars na. na.`� na. �> r RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT Sketch Plan Review D L C I\ E S I lid E i `d T f A 1_ SITE METRICS 2015 August 12th 66TH &YORK Edina, MN France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions (June 16, 2015) Element Working Principle and Supporting Questions Give -to -Get; Plan & Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with Process the district principles. 1 How does the proposal contribute to the realization of the principles for the district? 2 How can the proposal move beyond the principles for the district? 3 What tangible and intangible outcomes might be offered by the proposal but cannot be achieved by the project on its own? 4 What does the proposal offer as a way of balancing those outcomes provided by others? 5 What alternatives were explored to arrive at a proposal that is best aligned with the principles and the opportunities of the district? Edina Cultural Preferences; Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings Identity and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. 1 Discuss the materials and construction techniques intended for the building and the site with attention directed to ensuring an enduring quality is achieved, especially considering whether the proposal is a background or foreground element of the district. 2 What qualities of the proposal will be most valued by the community in 50 years? 3 Describe the ways in which the proposal highlights human activity in the building and on the site, especially when viewed from adjacent or nearby public ways? 4 In what ways does the proposal enhance the economic vibrancy of the district? 5 How does the proposal adapt itself to changing economic opportunities of the community and the district? District Function Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district. 1 Describe the ways in which the proposal is self-supporting related to on- and off-site infrastructure and resources. 2 What impacts does the proposal pose on existing on- and off-site . infrastructure? 3 What elements of the proposal support infrastructure needs of adjacent or nearby sites? pay 0 4 Describe the infrastructure features of the proposal that are truly RG extraordinary by relating the performance of those features to current standards, requirements, or best practices. 5 How the proposal relies on infrastructure of the district for baseline performance? Comprehensive Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating Connections; Movement movement of people within and to the district. 1 What features and amenities does the proposal lend to the public realm of the district? 2 What features and amenities does the proposal introduce to extend the sense of an expansive and engaging public realm to its site? 3 Demonstrate the ways in which the proposal supports pedestrians and bicyclists movement and identify those nearby district features that are important destinations. 4 What features does the proposal employ to ensure a safe and inviting pedestrian experience on the site? 5 ... Site Design; Transitions Encourage parcel -appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without "leftover" spaces on sites. 1 How does the proposal relate in terms of scale to it neighbors? 2 How does the proposal make full use of the available site, especially those portions of the site not occupied by parking and buildings? 3 How does the proposal interact with its neighbors? 4 Describe the zones of activity created by the proposal and compare those areas to zones of activity on adjacent and nearby sites. 5 ... Health Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves. 1 How does this proposal enhance key elements of environmental health (air, water, noise, habitat)? 2 How does proposal mitigate any negative impacts on environmental health on its own site? 3 How does proposal provide for a healthful environment beyond the current condition? 4 Describe ways in which human health needs are advanced by the proposal. 5 ... Innovation Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated problems. 1 Identify the problems posed by the proposal or the district requiring innovative solutions and describe the ways in which the proposal responds? • 2 Describe the metrics to be used to compare the innovations posed by the proposal. RG 3 For those solutions posed by the proposal as innovative, describe how they might become "best practices" for the district. 4 Describe innovations in systems and aesthetics and the ways in which systems and aesthetics for integrated solutions. 5 Describe other projects where innovations similar to those included in the proposal have been employed. Land Use; Live -able Promote well-balanced aggregations of "come to" and "stay at" Precincts places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. 1 How does the proposal complement the mix of uses in the district? 2 Describe the proposal in terms of "come to" and/or "stay at" places. 3 What adjacent or nearby "come to" or "stay at" places does the proposal rely on for vitality? 4 Demonstrate the flows of activity generated by the site during a typical weekday and weekend day. 5 In what ways does the proposal interact with surrounding sites to encourage an engaging public realm? Economic Vitality Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. 1 Describe the proposal in terms of its economic contributions to the district. 2 How does the proposal enhance development on adjacent or nearby sites? 3 What features of the site or district limit the potential of the proposal from being fully realized? 4 Why is the proposal best situated on its proposed site from the perspective of economic vitality? 5 How does the proposal make the district and the community a better place? • nab property line preventing the garage from being expanded directly that way. Commissioners Thorsen and Strauss accepted that amendment. Commissioner Nemerov noted that he supports the , dance as ented; however, has concerns with the level of design detail. Chair Platteter called for the vote; all vote ye; m on carried. V VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review. Titus/Eberhardt. 66th St at York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 5.6 acre parcel at 6550 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings and redevelop the site with the following two phase development: Phase 1 (3250 66' Street West): A 6-7 story, 230 -unit apartment building. Six, floors of housing above the parking and amenities area, and Phase 2 (6650 Xerxes Avenue): A 5-6 story, 145 -unit apartment building. IN Five and four floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. Teague explained that the primary entrance to the site would be off Xerxes Avenue. There is a secondary access available off of York. Both of these access points exist today. There is a shared access arrangement with the adjacent property owner at 3316 66th Street west. That shared access would also remain. Teague To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: Re -guiding of the site from RM, Regional Medical to CAC, Community Activity Center. The proposed height (7 stories) and density (66 units per acre) would meet the standards of the CAC. A rezoning of all the property to PUD, Planned Unit Development is requested. Teague reported that this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. he Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. A study is currently underway in this area as part of the Planning Commission's work plan, adding the France Avenue Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant. They have been asked to address each of the principles with any formal application. Teague further asked the Commission to note that the applicant is not proposing any affordable housing as part of this project. Given housing policy under consideration by the City Council; this project should be required to provide affordable housing consistent with the policy or 20% of the units designated for affordable housing. Teague concluded that the development team is present to explain their proposal. Appearing for the Applicant Rich Kauffman, DLC Residential and Dennis Sutliff, Elness, Swensen Graham Architects Discussion Commissioner Olsen asked if the majority of the parking would be underground. Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Lee asked if the RMD District shrinks would the district continue to be viable. Planner Teague responded that is a good question. Teague explained that the Regional Medical District evolved because of the hospital and the need for medical uses to be in close proximity. Teague reported that even if the area changes to CAC; medical is still a permitted use in that district. SCommissioner Nemerov asked for clarification on the building setback variances. Planner Teague responded that it has been the policy of the Commission and Council to bring (whenever possible) buildings up to the street to enhance the pedestrian experience. Teague did acknowledge because this project will be done in two phases that details can change. Nemerov questioned what would happen if the details changed from approval to build out. Teague said the applicants have indicated they would be redeveloping through the PUD process, adding if there are changes the PUD would need to be amended. Nemerov mentioned he is a Tittle concerned that this proposal is in phases. Applicant Presentation Mr. Kaufman addressed the Commission and gave a brief description of DLC, Inc. and explained the proposed residential redevelopment would occur in two phases. He said if the project proceeds they would be requesting a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning to PUD, and site plan approval. Kaufman said the majority of the apartment units would be one, one -plus and two bedroom units. Kaufman concluded there will be a small number of studio and three bedroom apartments. Mr. Sutliff told the Commission ESG has a long history within this neighborhood. He asked the Commission to note they embraced the France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions. Sutliff said this site is also a gateway site and the intent is to create something dynamitic. Phase I would occur on parcels 2 and 3 and will consist of a 230 unit rental apartment with two levels of underground parking. He reported that the existing Titus building will remain on parcel 1. When phase 2 commences the Titus building would be removed. With graphics Sutliff shared schematics of the project. Discussion Commissioner Olsen asked about the affordable housing element. Mr. Sutliff said there is a strong desire to implement affordable housing; however, they need to look for a way to implement it. Sutliff said there will be tradeoffs; reiterating they are willing to discuss it. Commissioner Carr said she likes the design elements of the proposed building and was impressed with the landscaping and the attention paid to pedestrian movements. Commissioner Strauss said he agrees, he likes the building, adding the approach is inviting. Commissioner Forrest commented with regard to sustainability at this time the City is looking for more than industry standards. Forrest said the City wants developers to go above and beyond that and to also indicate measurable standards. Commissioner Platteter said he has some concerns with the two phase concept and timing. He added he would hate to see the properties on the east become orphan properties. Continuing, Platteter said he can support the CAC designation for this area, adding it makes sense to have all four corners CAC. Platteter stated in his opinion affordable housing is needed period. With regard to the exterior of the building he wasn't "blown away"; suggesting that the curve in the road is followed more closely. In conclusion Platteter said the goal should be to view this parcel as part of a whole; not an individual island. He asked them to ensure that special attention is made to connectivity, transit options, and signals to traffic improvements to achieve the next level for pedestrian movement. Commissioner Nemerov said these four corners are important and suggested that the City and developers work together to develop a connected area. He suggested the possibility of walking bridges spanning the road. Mr. Sutliff said that their intent is to be a good neighbor adding they have every intention to grow the walkability. Sutliff said they are willing to work with city staff on this issue. Chair Platteter stated in this area public and private partnerships will be key to piecing these areas together. Commissioner Forrest commented that the buildings appear welcome and attractive from all sides; however, suggested that the applicant makes sure when the building is constructed that that element remains and isn't just drawings. Mr. Sutliff responded that the step back approach from the street offers the appearance of smaller building mass , adding they have every intention of creating a building attractive from all sides. Commissioner Forrest said she also was a bit concerned with the two phase element of the proposal and asked the applicant if there is a time frame. Mr. Kaufman responded that Phase I is ready to start in 2016 with Phase II within five to six years. Commissioner Lee asked what makes this site say" Edina". Mr. Sutliff said this land use element helps create a more mixed use area vs. just retail. The introduction of housing with excellent access to transit and other amenities help the buildings residents to move away from the automobile. Lee said in her opinion more work needs to be done in engaging the street, she pointed out the limited street frontage make it difficult to introduce retail. She suggest that the applicant's revisit their vision. She further added the City also needs to decide what the City wants to see on these four corners. Does the City want smaller shop fronts along the street with stepped back housing; or something different. She asked the applicant to show how people are encouraged to walk, not ride and how is the "true" gateway of this area established. Concluding, Lee also stated she is looking for affordable housing in this development. Commissioner Olsen agreed that much is proposed to be redeveloped at this intersection/corner, adding she too would like to see how they will connect together. She suggested that when they return with a formal applicant they show the connectivity between these corners. Olsen suggested that the applicant look at the bigger picture and how this fits into the greater Southdale area. Concluding, Olsen asked if there was any opportunity for other uses on the site. Mr. Sutliff responded that adding retail would complicate parking. He noted there is only a small amount of surface parking available. He said they want to create special outdoor spaces; however, there are restraints. Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant to ensure that people feel invited to walk through the area; she said she understands the difficulty in adding retail, suggesting that amenities like dry cleaners, bike repair, uses that would be used by occupants of the building may work. Commissioner Nemerov asked the applicant who their residents are. Mr. Kaufman responded he believes they will be the 30-stomethings that rent by choice. Nemerov asked the applicant if they were confident they can fill these units. Mr. Kaufman responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Carr asked the applicant to take the time to work on the streetscape and to work with the City on street calming measures on this corner and intersection. Chair Platteter thanked the applicant for their presentation noting the importance of connectivity and enhancing neighborhood walkability. B. 2016 Work Plan 81 Page To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: September" 16, 2015 Subject: Affordable Housing Policy Action Requested: Adopt the attached Policy as recommended by the Housing Foundation. o fe IJ. rl` ,` �° • ��rosroaP��9 • isee Agenda Item #: VII.E. Action ❑X Discussion ❑X Information ❑ Information/Background: Based on the July 21st City Council recommendation to consider fees in lieu of affordable housing, staff has worked with the Edina Housing Foundation to develop a recommendation. After several meetings, and considerable deliberation, the Housing Foundation is recommending the attached Policy. Please note that the format of the Policy has been changed from the Policy considered July 21st, however, the content is still the generally same. (See attached Policy and Memo from the Edina Housing Foundation, and the original policy considered July 21.) As part of their discussions, the Housing Foundation developed a formula for calculating fees in lieu of affordable housing based on the cost of producing an affordable housing unit. Because the fee ends up high, it may encourage developers to provide affordable housing within their project or dedicate the fee that it would have cost them to deliver an affordable unit. The way the fee is calculated is to take the difference between market rents (assumed to be $1.90/sq. ft.) compared with affordable rents at 50% level (the difference was slightly over $1000/month, on average for 1, 2, and 3 — bedroom units), then capitalizing this difference at a current market rate (6% was used), and then multiplying by 110%. The result at this time is $220,000 per unit. Therefore, as an example a 200 unit project would be required a 4.4 million dollar fees in lieu of dedication. That is $220,000 times 10% (20 units) is 4.4 million. See the calculation on the following page. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 • • REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Affordable Housing Calculation: Bedroom Unit Unit Size Market Rent Type Mix In sq ft @$1.90/sq ft 1 40% 750 $1,425 - 2 50% 1,100 $2,090 - 3 10% 1,200 $2,280 - 100% Page 2 Affordable Rent @ 50% Rent Level* Differential Average Rent Differential $737 = $688 $875 = $1,215 $1,000 = $1,280 $1,010/month Average Rent Differential $1,010/month X 12 months = $12,120/year $12,120/year _ 65V. capitalization Rate = $202,000/unit $202,000/unit X 110% = $222,200/unit Rounded to $220,000/unit *Reduced rents by tenant -paid utilities, assumed to be $75/month for 1 -bedroom, $100/month for 2 -bedroom and $125/month for 3 -bedroom. The chair of the Housing Foundation, Jeff Huggett, will be at the City Council meeting to answer any questions the Council may have. Please note in the proposed policy, that the Foundation does not endorse a specific fee in lieu of affordable housing for multiple residential housing projects. The foundation does recommend a more flexible policy as follows: 1. Whereas it is the strong preference of the City that each new qualifying development provide its proportionate share of affordable housing, the City recognizes that it may not be economically feasible or practical in all circumstances to do so. As such, the City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to waive this policy (only if circumstances so dictate, as solely determined by the City). In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: 1. Dedication of existing units in Edina equal to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality, in the sole determination of the City. 2. New construction of units of an equivalent quality within the City at a different site, again this would be at the sole discretion of the City. 3. Participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. 4. An alternative proposed by a developer that directly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing units within the city. Given the recent concern that developers have expressed over the draft policy from July 21St, and the housing foundations original fees in lieu of proposal, the above would provide the city with more flexibility when negotiating and requiring some form of affordable housing as part of a PUD. ATTACHMENTS: • Recommended Policy on Affordable Housing • Memo from the Edina Housing Foundation • Original Policy considered by the City Council on July 21, 2015 • ��� SHELTERING OUR COMMUNITY 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55421 952-826-0462 FAX: 952-826-0389 TO: Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council FROM: Edina Housing Foundation CC: Scott Neal, Cary Teague, Joyce Repya RE: Affordable Housing Policy DATE: August 25, 2015 Attached is the Edina Housing Foundation's revised Affordable Housing Policy Recommendation. Since submitting our .first draft recommendation earlier this year, the foundation board members have reached out to a variety of other cities with affordable housing • policies, reviewed a great deal of professional research on the topic, held discussions with staff of the Urban Land Institute, and considered feedback from city staff, the City Council and .Mayor. Based upon all of the above, we'll. start out with a few observations: - Over 500 communities across the country have adopted inclusionary housing ordinances — no two are exactly alike. . - We are NOT recommending an inclusionary housing ordinance, rather just an affordable housing policy. - This issue is complicated and involved, and some might argue .that we should study, and review this issue until we have "the perfect policy for Edina." We think that would be a mistake. There is no perfect policy. And delays will impose an opportunity cost of lost affordable housing during this strong redevelopment cycle. - The attached policy is our best effort to balance our community's need to produce housing affordable to a broader income range of people, while simultaneously not imposing undue costs that might lessen Edina's attractiveness to quality redevelopments. The remainder of this memo contains our comments and thought process on a variety of items in this policy: 1. We have attempted to keep this policy as succinct and straight -forward as possible, so that staff and City Council would be able to provide this document to potential • developers. Our goal here was not to be overly prescriptive in our approach, so that staff can have enough tools and flexibility to work with developers and craft solutions that best work for each individual redevelopment. • 2. We reduced the amount of affordable units to 10% from 20%. This was based upon Council's concerns about requiring too much affordability. Our thinking here is to require a smaller minimum amount so as not to over -burden developments with undue costs. However, we still believe that many developers will opt to provide more than these minimum levels because that will allow their developments to qualify for housing tax credits and housing TIF districts. 3. We added "parking reductions" under incentives that the City might consider, as this can also be a significant cost saver. 4. In order to provide City Council and staff with enough flexibility to address a myriad of different situations, we considered options the City might consider in lieu of requiring affordable housing be built in all new developments that request rezoning .We also note that St Louis Park's recently adopted Inclusionary Housing Policy allowed some of these options. Our recommended policy does not contain a "fee -in -lieu" option. This was probably the most controversial item in our policy consideration. We discussed a fee -in - lieu option extensively, and decided not to recommend it for two reasons. First, virtually all professionals we spoke with indicated that if the fee is set too low, the City will end up with cash but very little affordable housing. And second, a fee in lieu discussion is likely to be controversial and encourage long discussion over what the proper level of this fee ought to be. We believe this controversy will simply delay implementation of this . important policy and, thus, impose an opportunity cost to the community of lost affordable housing. We believe that the perceived flexibility a fee -in -lieu option might provide is far out -weighed by the costs of the lack of affordable housing built if this provision were included in this policy. Our discussion of a fee -in -lieu included considering the following formula for such a fee: Take the difference between market rents, (assumed to be $1.90/sq. ft.) compared with affordable rents at the 50% level (the difference was slightly over $1,000/month, on average for 1, 2, and 3 bedroom units); then capitalize this difference at a current market rate (6% was used); and finally multiply the result by 110% (the additional 10% is to compensate for delays in producing affordable units). This calculation resulted in a hypothetical fee -in -lieu of $220,000/dwelling unit. 5. Please note that the affordable sales price information was modified slightly to account for bedroom sizes - without this, the likelihood is that developers would propose mostly $350,000 1 - bedroom units - we overlooked that in our first version of the policy. is 2 • Affordable Housing Policy Edina, Minnesota Background Based upon a review of housing trends in Edina, it is apparent that the diversity of the city's housing stock has declined as a result of increasing property values and a reduction in the availability of more modest cost dwellings. Redevelopment has, in many cases, contributed to property value increases that further the difficulty of providing affordable housing in the city. Privately developed new residential housing that is being built in the city generally is not affordable. Many developers are interested in investing in Edina, but few are willing or able to provide affordable housing without encouragement and assistance from the City. The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing in order to maintain a diverse population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the city. Since the remaining land appropriate for new residential development is limited, it is essential that a reasonable proportion of such land be developed into affordable housing units. As such, the City of Edina adopts the following Affordable Housing Policy: • The Policy 1. This policy applies to all new multi -family developments of 20 or more units that require a re -zoning. 2. New rental developments will provide a minimum of 10% of all rentable area at 50% affordable rental rates or 20% of all rentable area at 60% affordable rental rates as defined below. 3. New for sale developments will provide a minimum of 10% of all livable area at affordable sales prices as defined below. 4. New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 15 years, and this requirement will be memorialized by a land use restrictive covenant. 5. Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the city will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: 1. Density bonuses 2. Parking reductions 3. Tax increment financing 4. Deferred low interest loans from the Edina Housing Foundation 6. Whereas it is the strong preference of the City that each new qualifying • development provide its proportionate share of affordable housing, the City recognizes that it may not be economically feasible or practical in all circumstances to do so. As such, the City reserves the right, in its sole discretion, • to waive this policy (only if circumstances so dictate, as solely determined by the City). In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: 1. Dedication of existing units in Edina equal to 1 10% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality, in the sole determination of the City. 2. New construction of units of an equivalent quality within the City at a different site, again this would be at the sole discretion of the City. 3. Participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. 4. An alternative proposed by a developer that directly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing units within the city. Definitions Rental Housing Either 10% of all rentable area is both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose income is 50% or less of area median gross income, • Or 20% of all rentable area is both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose income is 60% or less of area median gross income. Both incomes (adjusted for family size) and rental rates (adjusted for bedroom count and including utilities) are updated annually by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and published at www.mnhousing.gov. 2015 income and rental limits are as follows: • Ownership Housing Gross Incomes 60% 50% Gross Rents 60% 50% 1 Person $36,420 $30,350 Studio $910 $758 2 Persons $41,580 $34,650 1 Bedroom $975 $812 3 Persons $46,800 $39,000 2 Bedroom $1,170 $975 4 Persons $51,960 $43,300 3 Bedroom $1,351 $1,125 5 Persons $56,160 $46,800 4 Bedroom $1,507 $1,256 6 Persons $60,300 $50,250 • Ownership Housing • 10% or more of all livable area is affordable to and initially sold to persons whose income is at or below the levels set in the MHFA's "Startup Program" (first time homebuyer). This program has a sales price limit of $310,000. The Edina Housing Foundation has set this limit at $350,000 in consideration of the high prices in Edina. The Foundation would recommend the following sales prices be used as the acquisition limit in this definition: 1 bedroom $250,000 2 bedrooms $300,000 3+ bedrooms $350,000 The 2015 income limits as published on the MHFA website are as follows: 1-2 person household $86,600 3+ person household $99,500 Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually. See www.mnhousinq_,gov. • • • 0 C. o� CITY OF EDINA �r r Policy on Affordable Housing For New Multi -Family Developments That Require a Rezoning to a Multi -Family Zoning Districts including Planned Unit Development (PUD) Whereas, high land values in the City of Edina make it difficult to construct new housing units that are affordably -priced for working families and senior citizens; and Whereas, few real estate developers have been willing to provide 201 affordable housing in their projects, without assistance from the City; and Whereas developers are producing new housing at market rates that are out of reach for many households; and Whereas, the City of Edina needs a sustainable funding source for affordable housing; and Whereas, the City of Edina would benefit from a more diverse housing stock, by ensuring affordably - priced housing options are available to our workforce population and seniors. Background 1. The City of Edina and the Metropolitan Council have worked together and established an affordable housing goal of creating 212 new affordable housing units in Edina by the year 2020. Since 2008, the City Council has approved168 affordable housing units in the community. 2. The Edina Housing Foundation was established to assist the City to fund housing for low to moderate income. families and elderly persons. 3. The Edina Housing Foundation has worked to accomplish these goals in affordable housing. In addition to maintaining existing affordable housing in Edina, since 1986 the Edina Housing Foundation has assisted in providing 366 new affordable housing units in the City of Edina. 4. The City Council requested that the Edina Housing Foundation recommend an affordable housing policy for the City. Policy I. The.City Council will require that at least 20% of the total units in new multi -family housing developments over 20 units requiring a rezoning to a multi -family zoning districts, including. Planned Unit Development (PUD) be sold or rented at an affordable price as defined below. If no affordable housing is provided on-site, the City will require a one-time fee in lieu of affordable housing for such rezoning. Fees would be based on the average market rates of comparable housing units and negotiated on a project -by -project basis. The fee must be paid prior to issuance of a building permit and will be used to support affordable housing in other developments within the City of Edina. 2. The City will consider financial assisi.tance, including Tax Increment Financing (TIF) in accordance with Minnesota TIF statutes. .. Adopted by City Council (July 21, 2015) Page I 1 03. The City will consider higher density or a density bonus for projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing. 4. The Edina Housing Foundation has stated that they will consider providing financial assistance to new housing projects that include at least 20% of the total units for affordable housing. S. Affordable housing shall remain affordable for a minimum of 15 years; this requirement shall be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. Affordable Housing Definitions: Rental Housing: Either 20% of units are both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose income is 50% or less of the area median gross income, Or 40% or more of units are both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose income is 60% or less of the area median gross income. Both incomes (adjusted for family size) and rental rates (adjusted for bedroom count and including the cost of utilities) are updated annually and published in the Minnesota Housing website at www.mnhousing.gov. 2014 Income and rental limits are as follows: *Table to be adjusted annually Ownership Housing: 20% or more of units are affordable to and initially sold to persons whose incomeis at or below the levels set in the Minnesota Housing "Startup Program" (first time homebuyer). This program has a sales price limit of $310,000. The Edina Housing Foundation has set this limit at $350,000 in consideration of the high prices in Edina. The Foundation would recommend that $350,000 be used as the acquisition limit in this definition. The 2015 income limits as published on the Minnesota Housing website are as follows: 1-2 person household 3 + person household $86,600 $99,500 • Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually. Adopted by City Council (July 21, 2015) Page 1 2 Gross Incomes Gross Rents 60% 50% 60% 50% 1 Person $34,860 $29,050 1 Bedroom $933 $778 2 Persons $39,840 $33,200 2 Bedrooms $1,120 $933 3 Persons $44,820 $37,350 3 Bedrooms $1,293 $1,078 4 Persons $49,740 $41,450 4 Bedrooms $1,443 $1,202 5 Persons $53,760 $44,800 6 Persons $57,720 $48,100 *Table to be adjusted annually Ownership Housing: 20% or more of units are affordable to and initially sold to persons whose incomeis at or below the levels set in the Minnesota Housing "Startup Program" (first time homebuyer). This program has a sales price limit of $310,000. The Edina Housing Foundation has set this limit at $350,000 in consideration of the high prices in Edina. The Foundation would recommend that $350,000 be used as the acquisition limit in this definition. The 2015 income limits as published on the Minnesota Housing website are as follows: 1-2 person household 3 + person household $86,600 $99,500 • Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually. Adopted by City Council (July 21, 2015) Page 1 2 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 16, 2015 Agenda Item #: VII. F. Subject: Resolution No. 2015-88 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: Action x❑ Discussion ❑ Information ❑ In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2015-88 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-88 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation: Community Foundation Fencing around Reserve Garden & Lily Garden at Arneson Acres Park Community Foundation York Park Baseball Field Infield Sod Community Foundation York Park Baseball Field Irrigation Edina Police Department: David Melanson $500.00 Dated: September 16, 2015 Grandchild's Medical Response Thank You Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 16, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk • 0 To: Mayor and City Council From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Date: September 16, 2015 Subject: Accept Solar Garden Proposal Action Requested: Accept solar garden proposal. Agenda Item #: VII. G. Action M Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: The deadline for bids is September 11. Staff will compile the information and send it to the City Council in advance of the meeting. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 16, 2015 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. o e}� 0 Agenda Item #: VIII. A. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ 171 7500 York Ave. So. #441 Edina, MN 55435 September 3,2015 Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council As a resident of the Southdale area I am greatly concerned about the developer's plan to take down the Titus Building and the medical buildings on 66th Street across from Southdale on the north, to build luxury apartments. Several of my doctors have offices in those buildings and they are close to where I live and have convenient adequate parking. One of the reasons I moved to this area and have chosen to stay in my later years is the access to medical facilities. I am unable to drive long distances on freeways with heavy traffic. I do not want to lose my doctors! • Do we really need more luxury apartments? Please reject this plan and keep that area as it is.! Sincerely, a GJ�Lw Joanne R.B.Green Heather Branigin From: Edina Student Council <edinastudentcouncil@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 3:04 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Edina Homecoming Parade Hello Mayor Hovland, This is Michael Rodriguez writing on behalf of Student Council. As you may know, our homecoming parade is scheduled for Friday, September 18th at 4:30. We would love if you were able to join us again this year! We are asking participants to arrive at the tennis/pool parking lot off 50th street at 3:45. Per usual, you would be offered your own convertible, however, if you would like to ride with Dr. Dressen again, that also works! If you have any questions feel free to e-mail me back. Best, Michael Rodriguez Edina Student Council • Heather Branigin From: Shirley Maltby <smaltby@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: play set on public property To City Council Members Why is the Berger play set still on park land? I went by today and no movement. This is putting the city in jeopardy. What if some one has an accident? Shirley Rerat 4913 Payton Court 55435 • is Heather Branigin From: Scott H. Neal Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:27 PM To: 'Common Sense Edina'; James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton Subject: RE: Common Sense for Edina - Edina Urban Vision Symposium - who is underwriting the cost of the symposium and what is the cost? Mr. Frenkel — The press release typo has been corrected. It will be reissued immediately, drawing attention to the reason for its reissuance. Thank you for bringing it to our attention. The City is paying for the event from its General Fund. As noted in the press release, it is a public event and the public is invited to attend. Biographical information about the speaker for the event is included in the press release. Staff made an editorial decision about how much of his lengthy bio to include in the release. i� Scott Neal, City Manager 952-826-0401 1 Fax 952-826-0390 J ;} + sneal@EdinaMN.gov 1 www.EdinaMN.gov From: Common Sense Edina [mailto:commonsenseforedina@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 3:41 PM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonannl@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - Edina Urban Vision Symposium - who is underwriting the cost of the symposium an� what is the cost? If the City of Edina is underwriting the cost of the Edina Urban Vision Symposium what is the cost and where is the money coming from to pay for it? 1 These are basic transparency questions that residents have a right to know. I would also have somebody fix the typo in the press release, presumably the symposium is in the morning but *the press release says the reception and networking are in the evening. It is also standard procedure to include the bio of speaker(s) that are presenting at a conference, seminar or luncheon. Below the symposium press release is an example of a luncheon invitation I recently received and it shows a bio for the speaker because it adds speaker credibility and helps people decide if they want to attend the event. Also notice the difference in URL's for each event. The Edina press release URL means nothing to the general public and the AFCEA event below has a meaningful URL. David Frenkel http://edinamn.gov/index.php?sectionfpressroom pressreleases&prrid=1042 Friday, September 04, 2015 Edina, Minn., Sept. 1, 2015 — I he City of Edina invites residents to hear a free presentation on urbanism from national expert Joe Minicozzi. The presentation will be held 8 to 10 a.m. Monday, Sept. 14, at the Edina Country Club, 5100 Wooddale Ave. Registration and networking will be held from 8 to 8:30 p.m. Minicozzi will speak for about 45 minutes beginning and 8:30 a.m. and will then answer questions from the audience. Known for his take on "the smart math of mixed -used development," Minicozzi is the principal of Urban 3. The company's work has prompted a paradigm shift in understanding the economic potency of urbanism and the value of well-designed •cities. Urban 3's studies have resulted in the reevaluation of public policy and a broader understanding of market dynamics created by tax policy. Space is limited, but reservations are required. Register for this free event atwww.EdinaMN.gov or by calling Executive Assistant Heather Branigin, 952-826-0403. ***•k•k#*****•f **d: ** k'k**XX*k*#***9-r. **** X****x-k** https://www.afceanova.orq/September2015Luncheon Luncheon w/Maj. Caen. Linda R. Urrutia-Varhall, assistant Deputy Chief of Staff, ISIS Event Date: Friday, September 11, 2015 - 1 1:30am - 1:3,Opnn Maj. Gen. Linda R. Urrutia-Varhall is the Assistant Deputy- Chief of Staff, Intelligence. Surveillance and Reconnaissance, the Pentagon, Washington. D.C. General ih rutia-Varinall was commissioned in 1984 as a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy. Following her initial assignments at Offutt Air Force Lase, Neb.. she was selected to participate in the Professional Military Graduate Intelligence Program in Washington, D.C. Atter completion, she was the first Air Force representative to the National Military Intelligence Center. Her service at the Pentagon included executive support duty to three Secretaries of Defense and as an international politico -military affiairs officer on the Somalia Task Force. The general leas held command and staff positions in the living, major cor7tmand, headquarters and joint environments. In 1908, she was named to command the first Air Force Information Warfare Flight at 9th Air Force/Central Air Forces. Shavv AFB. S.C. She also deployed to Southwest Asia where site served as Chief, Analysis Division, and an operations officer for the Joint Intelligence Center at .S. Central Command Headquarters Forward.. She also served as the Senior Military Assistant to the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Senior Executive to the Director of National Intelligence. Prior to her current position, she served as Director of intelligence, Surveillance. and Reconnaissance (J2) at U.S. Southern Command in Florida. Heather Branigin From: nankfaust <nankfaust@aol,com> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 2:33 PM To: James Hovland Cc: Dave Snaza Subject: Great City employees Dear Jim, I think it is important to tell you when city employees go the extra mile for the citizens. I have had a landscaping job on the agenda for a while but our lot had some city posts and signs that were difficult to work around. Dave Snazi and his supervisor, Dave O'Brian went over the city specs and I was allowed to purchase posts that were much more in line with my landscaping plans. They coordinated with the landscapers with concise instructions. I am so grateful... these men are great employees. Sent from my iPad • Heather Branigin From: nankfaust <nankfaust@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 2:35 PM To: James Hovland Cc: Dave Snaza Subject: Faust I forgot to sign my name to the letter about the great employees! Oh no. Nan Faust Sent from my iPad • • 0UeatherKBraniain From: Reetz Beth <beth./eetz@metcstatemnus> Sent: Wednesday, September 09'20l63:l7PM To: James Hovland Subject: Maurice McGough, HUD, Region V, Director of FHEO Hovland - At HUD's request, the Metropolitan Council was asked to provide names of individuals able to provide perspectives on the affordable and fair housing landscape in the 7 -county metropolitan region. |arnwriting tnlet you know |provided your name given your role. Mr. Maurice (Maury) McGough, Director of HUD's Region V Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity may contact you within the next few weeks toarrange atime tutalk with you. Please let nneknow ifyou have any questions orconcerns. Best Regards, Beth Beth Reetz mmcw, | Community Development Division P e51,602.1060 | Fo51.6oz./44z 3oownm`nobanmmm | cx Patmm|s»m1 | NIFT"ROPOLFFM G 0 J -N C I -. I/ ~ C[�NNECTVV|THUB ��� @0�0. 0 1 Heather Branigin From: Steve Winnick <winsteve@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:33 AM To: Robert Stewart; kstauton@EdinaMN.gov; Mary Brindle; swansonannl@gmail.com; James Hovland Subject: Affordable Housing Mayor and Councilmembers: I am a member of the Human Rights and Relations Commission; but I'm writing you this message as an individual. As you know, the HRRC has issued its Advisory to the Council opposing "cash in lieu" of a developer of multi -family housing complying with a proposed minimum of 20% of units being affordable. My family and I have lived here for over 40 years; first in the Cornelia neighborhood and now on Lanham Lane,near Lewis Park. We support Affordable Housing- and do so as neighbors of affordable and subsidized units on Cahill Road and West 70th Street. Oaks of Braemar and Oak Glen work alongside and near upscale townhomes and single family homes. We are richer for the diverse community and school populations. To allow developers to buy their way out of a policy encouraging Affordable Housing when building new units is contrary to good policy. Either we believe in building a diverse community or not. Dollars in a pot to allow the City , in the undefined future to act as it own developer or hire another would only result in waste, duplicity and encouragement of building "housing projects" rather than diverse, multicultural, integrated homes for new residents who wish to take advantage of what Edina has to offer. My view is that the discussion should be over the percentage of Affordable units; whether 20% or another number- not some overly complex formula to create a pot of money in lieu of immediate compliance.The community deserves certainty of direction in this debate. Thank you - Steve Winnick 7117 Lanham Lane winsteve(a�comcast.net • • To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 16, 2015 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. 4,91N�,j� `• o e cORPORS, 1986 Agenda Item #: VIII. A. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • 4115 Sunnyside Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 September 8, 2015 Mr. James B. Hovland, Mayor Mr. Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Gentlemen: Why do we have stop signs in the Country Club neighborhood? Absolutely no one obeys them. Delivery trucks don't, contractors don't, residents don't, cut -through drivers often blow through them as if they weren't there at all, I have even seen Edina police cruisers roll through them. The only vehicles that as a group come close to stopping are the school buses, but they are inconsistent. My house overlooks the intersection of Sunnyside Rd. and Bruce Ave., and I don't believe I have ever seen anyone actually stop at that sign (unless forced to by cross traffic on Sunnyside). The very worst are at Wooddale and Country Club Blvd., in all directions, and especially Wooddale • southbound at Sunnyside, where many drivers don't even slow down perceptibly. The Edina P.D. appears to have abandoned any enforcement effort. We used to see a police car on Arden near Sunnyside occasionally, looking for the more egregious violations on Sunnyside, but it must be three or four years since I have observed that effort. The status quo creates disrespect for traffic laws in general, and jeopardizes the many children and residents who cross these streets every day at these intersections. Because these signs are nearly universally ignored and go (mostly) unenforced, why don't we just remove them? Safety won't be compromised, and it will reduce government intrusion into everyone's personal driving and walking behavior. I invite both of you to join me sometime to sit at any intersection of your choice in this neighborhood for a few minutes to observe driver compliance with the stop signs. Cordially, / / Andrew Selden 952.926.5373 Heather Branigin From: Shirley Maltby <smaltby@hotmail.com> • Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 11:06 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Affordable Housing What is it? To All Members of the City Council Please explain affordable housing to me. What is affordable housing? Is it small units in apartment buildings? Is it government subsidized? How does one qualify? How is it monitored? Is it small homes under a certain price? Which by the way, are being torn down at an amazing rate. Can you explain it is a lay person can understand? As this is to be discussed at the meeting Sept 16, 2015 1 hope people in the audience as well as the people at home could understand. Perhaps this is part of the reason 27% of people in Edina are unhappy about the direction the city is moving. Thanks Shirley Rerat 1 • Heather Branigin &rom: Mary Voight <mcavoight@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 10:19 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Airplane Noise Suggestion: TRAINS Hello: Please consider advocating for improving that national TRAIN network in this country similar to services provided in TAIWAN! "This year's operational performance has shown a record high of both passenger volumes and revenues since the running of the Taiwan High Speed Rail. The average number of passengers transport is posted 620,000 daily and the daily revenue is approximately NT$46.24 million." http://www.railway.gov.tw/en/CP.aspx?sn=16989&n=19586 Thank you, Mary C. Voight St. Paul, 55119 0 Heather Braniain From: Erica Sniegowski <esniegowski@ninemilecreek.org> • Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:46 PM To: esniegowski@ninemilecreek.org Subject: Nine Mile Creek Discovery Point Grand Opening Celebration - Thursday, Sept. 24 Attachments: Nine Mile Creek Discovery Point Grand Opening.pdf Please join the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District as we celebrate the Grand Opening of Nine Mile Creek Discovery Point! Discover stormwater demonstration projects artfully integrated into the landscape, learn more about the programs of the District, and enjoy fun for all ages. When: Thursday, Sept. 24'h, 2015, from 4:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Where: Nine Mile Creek Discovery Point 12800 Gerard Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Shuttle: The Discovery Point parking lot is limited to drop-offs and accessible parking. Please park at City Hill Church (12901 Roberts Drive, Eden Prairie) and shuttle to the event. Or, it is a pleasant % mile walk from the church to the building. • RSVP to Gael at gzembal@ninemilecreek.org or 952-204-9691. Featuring: • Free food • Scavenger hunt • Native seed giveaway • Site tours (5 p.m. and 6 p.m.) • Kid crafts • Nature seminars (Nature Photography 5:30 p.m. and Buckthorn Removal 6:30 p.m.) Visit www.ninemilecreek.org for more details. Nine Mile Creek Discovery Point is the headquarters of the Nine Mile Watershed District and a unique educational facility encouraging visitors to learn best practices in water management and conservation. Erica Sniegowski Education and Outreach Coordinator New address! Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 12800 Gerard Dr. Eden Prairie, MN 55346 Phone: (952) 358-2276 • www.ninemilecreek.or 1 • -1\lU klCULJ mOC111111Q1J. 1VdLUiC r11ULUr:,icL_Jlly IJ:JU 1"1Vlf Q11U-DUL1KL11U111 IO.JU rIV1) Heather Braniqin From: Abby A Majeske <Abby.Majeske@hennepin.us> • Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 3:18 PM To: Janis Callison; Edina Mail Cc: Jan E Duffie Subject: Notice of Application for Repurchase 5017 Hankerson Ave Edina Attachments: Bradley W. Erdall_PID_28-117-21-32-0004.pdf Dear Commissioner Callison and City Council Members of Edina, An application for repurchase of tax.forfeited property has been made for 5017 Hankerson Ave. The attached notice of application states the date of hearing (10-6-15) and deadline for any written comments to be received by Hennepin County Resident and Real Estate Services (10-2-15). Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Abby Majeske Senior Property Management Specialist Hennepin County Resident and Real Estate Services 300 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55487-0060 Mail Code 060 • Phone: 612-348-2995 Email: abby.maieskeCa)_.hennepin.us Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 0 ■ C7ST E • NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR REPURCHASE Office of the Hennepin County Auditor State of Minnesota September 14, 2015 County of Hennepin To Potential Eligible Repurchasers and Persons Interested in the Lands Described Herein: This is to notify you that an application for the repurchase of a parcel of tax forfeited land, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 282,241, has been received in my office. The name, address, and legal interest at the time of forfeiture in the subject property of the repurchase applicant, as well as the subject parcel's legal description, property address, and tax parcel identification number are listed below: Applicant: Bradley W Erdall Property ID: (24) 28-117-21-32-0004 5017 Hankerson Ave Property Address: 5017 Hankerson Ave Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Legal Description: LOT 004 BLOCK 001 "BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS" Legal Interest: Warranty Deed- A9302918 Recorded 1212312008 The Hennepin County Board has the authority and responsibility, pursuant to the above statute, to approve or disapprove each application for repurchase and to determine from among the eligible repurchasers who should receive title to the repurchased property with the state deed. OThe County Board's statutory authority in this area has been delegated to the Hennepin County Administrator (the county auditor) under Resolution No. 95-8-556R1, adopted August 8, 1995. The County Administrator has delegated this statutory authority and responsibility to the Director of Taxpayer Services Department as the County Auditor -Treasurer by memorandum dated August 23, 1995. • Notice of application for repurchase is hereby given by United States mail to the repurchase applicant named above, and to those legally interested persons and potential repurchasers named in Attachment A and in addition to the city clerk of Edina. SEE ATTACHMENT A: If the aforementioned application for repurchase is approved, a state deed will be requested in the following name(s): Bradley W. Erdall Written comments on the application for repurchase referenced above must be received in my office within ten (10) days. Written comments in this case must be received no later than 4:30 p.m. on October 2, 2015. The decision to approve or disapprove the application for repurchase referenced above, and to formally determine who is to receive tax title by state deed which shall be requested from the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue, shall be made by the county auditor at A600 Government Center, Minneapolis, at 2:00 p.m. on October 6, 2015 RP #1793. 1 Please direct all written comments to the county auditor at the address prescribed below. For more information, contact the Tax -Forfeit & Property Revenue Section at (612) 348-3734, 8:00am - 4:30pm, Monday-1=riday. Mark Chapin, Director of Taxpayer Services Department Hennepin County Auditor r fire P By Deputy County Auditor v A-600 Government Center>.-AUTFigPts D F'OTY COUNTYAUDMOR �@ ESOTA �' V r ••. ~� e •• 300 South Sixth Street rp soTA STA TES, SECTION IM.15 ' Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060...... ABBY UAjESKE ■r■r■r■■■raarrrrrrr■■■rrr■rr■■arrrrrr■■a■rrrrrrrr■e■■■■■■■r■t�r�r■■rrr■rryrrr�lr�r���r�iiirrrrr� ATTACHMENT A. City of Edina City Manager Scott Neal 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina Community Development Director • Cary Teague 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Commissioner Jan Callison 300 S. 6tn Street A2400 Minneapolis, MN 55487 Edina City Council Members mail@edinaMN.gov 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Bradley VV. Erdall 5017 Hankerson Ave Edina, MN 55436 Posted in the Office of the Hennepin County Auditor 2 • Heather Branigin Orom: Peter Suechting <peter@weareimpact.org> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 5:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Clean Water Rule Letter Sign -on Dear City Council Member Hovland, Thanks so much for your help earlier this year getting Senator Franken to support the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Water Rule. Thanks to your help and many others, the Clean Water Rule took effect on August 28`h, and drinking water for over 970,000 Minnesotans is now protected. Unfortunately, this fall we are expecting more attacks on the Clean Water Rule in Congress, so we need to make sure that Senator Klobuchar supports the Clean Water Rule. We are working to get local elected officials here in Minnesota to sign onto a new letter (below) and we'd love to have your support again. Please let me know if you have any questions, and I will talk to you soon. Sincerely, Peter Peter Suechting Clean Water Organizer Environment Minnesota 16920) 371-4278 peter@environmentminnesota.org The Honorable Senator Klobuchar 1200 S Washington Ave Suite 250 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Dear Senator Klobuchar, MMENVIRONM((E��NmT 1T1V 1� As elected officials across Minnesota, we write to urge you to take a public stand in support of the Clean Water Rule enacted by U.S. EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers to restore Clean Water Act protection to thousands of waterways here in Minnesota and across the country. As elected officials, we know how critically important clean water is to the health and economic livelihood of people in our local communities and across our state. Our constituents need clean water for drinking, fishing, swimming, agriculture, recreation, and the wellbeing of their communities. Waterways like the Mississippi River and our 10,000 akes are part of what make Minnesota beautiful, thriving, and prosperous. But our waters' health is threatened. eginning in 1972, the Clean Water Act protected all of the nation's waters, from small, unnamed streams to the cherished Mississippi River. But for the past 15 years, many of our waterways were not guaranteed protection from pollution, including the streams that feed our lakes and rivers, and wetlands that help keep them clean, because of two bitterly -divided Supreme Court decisions (SWANCC in 2001 and Rapanos in 2006). Fortunately, the Clean Water Rule took effect on August 28'x' and restored protection to the 51% percent of our streams here in Minnesota that had previously lacked clear protection. According to EPA data, these waters help provide drinking • water to over 970,000 Minnesotans. To protect our treasured 10,000 Lakes, we urge you to take a public stand in support of the rule which restores critical protections to these waters under the Clean Water Act. By restoring Clean Water Act protections we can put all of Minnesota's waters back on track to becoming safe for swimming, fishing, and drinking. We cannot afford to let clean water become a bargaining chip at any point in the rancorous budget debate this fall. We appreciate your commitment to protecting Minnesota's waterways, and we hope you will move quickly to ensure they are protected for years to come. Sincerely, CJ 0 Heather Branigin Orom: David Arbit <davida@mplsrealtor.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 1:35 PM To: James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle; 'swensonannl@gmail.com'; Edina Mail Subject: August 2015 Market Update from MAAR Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council: The Minnesota DNR has ranked this summer as one of the nicest on record since about 1900. And it's not just the weather that's favorable. Home sales reached 10 -year highs not seen since 2005, prices continued to rise but at a more sustainable pace and both interest rates and job growth have remained conducive to recovery. Metro -wide, homes sold in near record time while sales and prices increased from last August. Here's what is happening in your neck of the woods. • New Listings in Edina decreased 8.8 percent to 125. • Pending Sales were up 20.5 percent to an even 100. • Closed Sales increased 8.7 percent to 113. • Days on Market was up 58.5 percent to 84 days. • The Median Sales Price increased 16.7 percent to $421,300: • Inventory levels grew 2.9 percent to 385 homes—an encouraging sign for buyers. • Percent of List Price Received at Sale decreased 0.9 percent to 97.1 percent. • Months Supply of Inventory remained flat at 4.7 months. 40O Distressed sales made up 0.9 percent of all Closed Sales. • Single -Family homes made up 69.6 percent of all Closed Sales. • New construction properties made up 5.3 percent of all Closed Sales. As summer gives way to autumn, expect some normal seasonal fluctuation, but the trend should remain positive when compared to prior years. The most recent Twin Cities unemployment rate is 3.7 percent, significantly lower than the national rate of 5.1 percent and the second lowest of any major metro area. The Commerce Department reported that private housing starts reached their highest level since October 2007. With housing and the broader economy performing relatively well, the Federal Reserve is prepared to finally lift rates off zero by year-end. The sooner that begins, the more gradual it will be. Your local report lives here: http://maar.stats.10kresearch.com/docs/Imu/x/edina. The Twin Cities Metro report can be found here: http://maar.stats.10kresearch,com/docs/Imu/x/TwinCitiesRe.qion. If you have any comments or questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Also, be sure to check out all of the market reports on our website - http://www.mpisrealtor,com. Thank you! Best, David Arbit, MCRP Director of Research & Economics Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS® 5750 Lincoln Drive - Edina, MN 55436 USA P:952-988-3150 I F:952-908-2646 •MAAR I Market Reports I Blop Heather Branigin From: Long, Jamie <jamie.long@mail.house.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 2:55 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Mayors Ozone Letter Dear Mayor Hovland: Below is a sign on letter for mayors to express support for a strong clean air rule on ozone pollution. The Congressman recently led a similar letter that he sent in July. If you are interested in being added to the letter, please reach out to Vicki.bennett@slcgov.com by Thursday, September 17. Regards, Jamie Jamie Long District Director Congressman Keith Ellison (MN -05) 2100 Plymouth Avenue N, Minneapolis, MN 55411 (612)522-1212 is [DATE), 2015 President Barack Obama 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear President Obama, As local elected officials representing big cities and small towns, we want to express our strong support for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) work to update the ozone (or smog) standard. The current, George W. Bush - era standard of 75 parts per billion (ppb) has been widely acknowledged by the medical community as insufficient to protect public health. As mayors, we are on the front lines of protecting the safety and well-being of our constituents and this long -overdue update will reap tremendous benefits for our communities. To best guard our families and constituents from this dangerous pollutant, we urge EPA to stay true to the science and in setting the standard follow the guidance of expert medical organizations like the American Lung Association, the American Heart Association, the American Thoracic Society, and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Smog pollution, much of it coming from power plant emissions and vehicle exhaust, represents a particularly widespread threat to families nationwide. According to the American Lung Association's 2014 State of the Air report, approximately 45% of the population — or 140.5 million people — live in counties that received a grade of "F" for their air pollution. This is especially problematic for sensitive populations such as children, the elderly, those with breathing ailments, outdoor workers, low-income families and communities of color. The Clean Air Act is clear in requiring EPA to set a standard not • just protective of healthy individuals, but also protective of these vulnerable populations. Nearly 26 million Americans, including 7 million children, suffer from asthma. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, minority children living in poor socio-economic conditions are at a greater risk. For instance, 16% of African American children had asthma in 2010, compared to 8.2% of White children. Low income families are wore likely to live close to sources of pollution and roadways, have lower access to medical information and health insurance, and die from asthma -related complications. EPA's own analysis shows that the strongest option under consideration would save taxpayers as much as $75.9 billion annually when fully implemented through lower health care costs. Each year, this would translate into as many as 7,900 lives saved and 1.8 million asthma attacks and 1.9 million missed school days avoided. Clean, healthy air and water are fundamental American rights and we are eager to work with your Administration to secure and implement the strongest possible protections from smog pollution. Respectfully, Grand Rapids MI George Heartwell Salt Lake City UT Ralph Becker Minneapolis MN Betsy Hodges Mosier OR Arlene Burns Carmel IN James C. Brainard St. Louis MO Francis G. Slay orth Chicago IL Leon Rockingham Highland Park IL Nancy Rotering Garden Grove CA Bao Nguyen Sugar Creek MO Matt Mallinson Warren MI Jim Fouts Ferndale MI David Coulter Mukilteo WA Jennifer Gregerson Ann Arbor MI Christopher Taylor University City MO Shelley Welsch Chicago IL Rahm Emanuel St. Petersburg FL Rick Kriseman Burlington VT Miro Weinberger College Park MD Andrew Fellows Charlotte NC Dan Clodfelter Alton IL Brant Walker Evanston IL Elizabeth Tisdahl Glen Carbon IL Robert Jackstadt Little Rock AR Mark Stodola Newton MA Setti Warren Muncie IN Dennis Tyler Moab UT Dave Sakrison South Bend IN Pete Buttigieg Kingston Springs TN Francis A. Gross Norman OK Cindy S. Rosenthal Alta UT Tom Pollard Ketchum ID Nina Jonas Bridgeport CT Bill Finch Borough of West Chester PA Carolyn Comitta Philadelphia PA Michael Nutter Bloomington IN Mark Kruzan Decatur GA Jim Baskett Clarkston GA Ted Terry Santa Fe NM Javier M. Gonzales Village of Lombard IL Keith Giagnorio Syracuse NY Stephanie A. Miner Las Cruces NM Ken Miyagishima Ames IA Ann Campbell Medford MA Michael McGlynn Fayetteville AR Lioneld Jordan 0 • 0 Heather Branigin Orom: Sent: To: Subject: L` • Megan Spear <megan=environmentminnesota.org@mail68.atl91.mcsv.net> on behalf of Megan Spear <megan@environmentminnesota.org> Tuesday, September 15, 2015 4:45 PM Edina Mail Environment Minnesota Coalition Letter Sign -on: Your Support is Needed! Environment Minnesota is a statewide advocacy organization bringing people together for a cleaner, greener, healthier fixture. www, environt-net ?tt-nili(lesota. ol'g' Dear Mr. Hovland, View this .email _in vour browser My name is Megan Spear, and I'm a campaign organizer with Environment Minnesota's Go Solar campaign. As I'm sure you know, solar energy is an incredibly valuable resource to our state. Placing more solar energy on the grid lowers the need for expensive new fossil fuel power plants, the cost of which would otherwise be passed to electric consumers. Solar energy also provides value to our environment by reducing harmful emissions that cause air pollution and climate change. As an elected official you, of course, have a special stake in the consumer protection, environmental health and technological advancement of Minnesota's communities today and in the future. In order to move forward with a clean energy future and increase solar power in the state we need to show Governor Dayton that Minnesota leaders like you thank him for supporting solar energy in Minnesota, and ask him for his continued support on policies that have worked to provide access to the sun's energy. Can you sign -on to a letter to Governor Mark Dayton thanking him for passing the Solar Energy Jobs Act in 2013, and asking him to continue to support renewable energy policies Dear Governor Mark Dayton, As Minnesota businesses, organizations and civic leaders, we thank you for - supporting solar energy and encourage you to ensure that Minnesota reaches its goal of 10 percent solar by 2030. Minnesota has vast potential to use solar energy. Recent data from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory shows that Minnesota could generate 150 times the electricity we currently use, just from the sun. The state has more than 600, 000 buildings available that can host rooftop solar panels. Solar is on the rise in Minnesota and across the country. Since 2010, solar has grown in Minnesota 61 percent annually. Yet, Minnesota still gets less than 1 percent of its power from the sun. We could easily generate 10 percent of our power from solar by 2030 if we maintain a modest growth rate of 43 percent annually. Solar energy is an incredibly valuable resource to our state. Placing more solar energy on the grid lowers the need for expensive new fossil fuel power plants, the cost of which would otherwise be passed to electric consumers. Solar energy also provides value to our environment by reducing harmful emissions that cause air pollution and climate change. A recent review of 11 net metering studies confirms the value of distributed solar energy, showing that solar users are "givers" not "takers" when it comes to the energy grid and to society as a whole. For these reasons, we thank you for supporting solar energy in Minnesota by passing the Solar Energy Jobs Act in 2013. As you know, this important legislation set goals for solar energy in Minnesota, including a non -mandatory goal of 10 percent solar by 2030. We encourage you to help the state reach that goal by supporting policies that have worked to provide access to the sun's energy. These policies include net energy metering, shared community solar, renewable energy standards that promote onsite • 0 E Copyright © 2015 Environment Minnesota. All rights reserved. We are reaching out to civic leaders to sign -on to our letter thanking Governor Dayton for his work, and asking him to continue to support clean energy policies in Minnesota. Our mailing address is: Environment Minnesota 615 1st Ave. NE Minneapolis, MN 55413 Add us to...your gdi ti ess book Want to chanqe,119W yoU receive these emails? You can update V = criDe from this list Heather Branigin From: t&r <trwagner5@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 11:10 PM To: James Hovland Subject: city contractor concerns Dear Mayor Hovland, We are long time Edina residents that, along with our neighbors, have been suffering through a street and infrastructure upgrade project over the last couple of months. I am sharing my most recent communication with the public works department ( my third or fourth communication in the last couple of weeks) in order to seek resolution of issues created by carelessness and substandard work by the contractor on our project. While each of our neighbors would likely share similar concerns, a multitude of events affecting my property has now driven me from being quietly dissatisfied to becoming a vocal critic. At a minimum I would hope that the contractor responsible for this project is penalized for the required remediation without taxpayer support and that any prospect of their participation in future projects be carefully scrutinized by the city. I might add that the representatives of our public works department have promptly and politely responded to my prior inquiries and concerns, but seem unable to directly rectify the issues or influence the contractor's actions. Sincerely, Tom Wagner 6004 Bonnie Brae Drive • Edina. MN 55439 t rwagner5 @comcast. net The text of mV comments submitted this evening on the Edina Public Works reporting site: I would like to meet a city representative on my property to review serious issues with the contractor responsible for the current project on Bonnie Brae Drive. 1) The contractor cut utilities servicing my home from both comcast and cenuturylink on 9/8. After being without utilities for several days, both suppliers have run temporary lines from remote locations (century link over 200 feet across neighboring lawns). Each utility indicated that the contractor had severed the primary lines and that a new underground access will now need to be drilled under bonnie brae. Utilities were located yesterday at the corner with spray paint and flags and today the contractor sprayed hydroseed which covered the utility markings. Per the utilities, this drilling process needs to be rectified by the contractor in order to have my original service restored. 2) The end of one of my driveways was damaged and an 18 inch repair grafted on. In the process the contractor appears to have removed and not replaced a conduit channel that I had in place under the asphalt for future wiring needs. Needs to be redone, replacing the original wiring conduit. 3) My irrigation system has been disabled for many weeks. I need an update on the repair process or an indication that I am responsible to call an irrigation contractor in time for fall watering / fertilizer. My neighbor has already done this and has suggested that a class action suit initiated by the neighborhood to recover out of pocket costs necessary to • properly restore lawns and irrigation systems might be required. I hope not. 1 4) The stop sign at corner of Bonnie Brae and Gleason is now leaning and visibly rocks in the wind from its "temporary location". This is a hazard that 1 have brought to your attention on multiple occasions over the last couple of weeks and it is now likely to soon fall in the street, on a car or, possibly, strike an unlucky person . Please rectify. &) Flashing warning signs and garbage were still piled in my yard today well off the city easement. I have stacked at the curb for removal. 6) The restoration of disturbed soil did not include any effort to compact the base prior to placement of top soil. Final grade already below sidewalk and will settle further likely leading to pooling water around power transformer. This would appear to be a bad combination and would like a City representative to confirm that this meets the city code and standards for contractor performance. We have lived in this home for 15 years and Edina for 26 years having never complained about our city services. I have also compared experiences with others that have had similar street repairs in Edina and elsewhere. I strongly believe that the damage, carelessness and work quality of the contractor on this project is highly substandard and the remaining problems need to be rectified or compensation provided in order to fund repairs by quality contractors. Thank you Tom Wagner c: James Hovland • • MINUTES OF THE RETREAT OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK AUG. 11, 2015 5:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Gieseke called the meeting to order at 5:42 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Nelson, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Segreto, Strother, McCormick, Good Member Jones arrived at 5:48 p.m. Student Members present: Colwell Absent Student Member Chowdhury 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Good made a motion, seconded by Member Cella, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Segreto, Strother, McCormick, Good Motion approved. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA • Member Good made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, approving the regular meeting minutes of July 14, 2015, as amended on Page three to change "Mr. Hayward stated there generally is ..." to "Mr. Hayward stated there generally is not much activity except for the Fourth of July Fireworks". W.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of Tuesday, July 14, 2015 Ayes: Members Nelson, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Segreto, Strother, McCormick, Good Motion approved. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None Vt. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Human Services Task Force Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board the Human Services Task Force needs a Park Board representative. She went over what the position entails. Member Segreto commented that she has been the Park Board representative on the Human Services Task Force and noted that members decide how the funds are allocated and most times the City Council takes the recommendation and approves it. Member Jones stated that she will volunteer to be the Park Board representative on the Human Services Task Force. • Member McCormick made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to appoint Member Jones as the Park Board representative to the Human Services Task Force. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Segreto, Strother, McCormick, Good Motion approved. • VI.B. Park Board Retreat — Tuesday, Aug. 1 1, 5:30 — 9:30 p.m. at Centennial Lakes Park Ms. Kattreh presented the Park Board Retreat Agenda. Member McCormick provided brief remarks about what will be done during the Park Board Retreat. Chair Gieseke introduced Don McCormick, who works for United Healthcare working for talent development, and indicated he will be facilitating the retreat. Mr. McCormick explained to the Park Board that discussions will be held regarding what is working with the Park Board and what may need improvement. He asked each member to think about answers to the following questions: What should the Park Board keep doing? What should the Park Board start doing? What should the Park Board stop doing? Members were asked to fill out the post -it notes and place them on the charts in the front of the room. Mr. McCormick reviewed the items on what the Park Board should keep doing. • Keep utilizing small work groups • Keep discussing how to implement the strategic plan into the work plan • • Conduct annual retreat to help members build relationships • Investing in facility improvements • Opportunities to work on task groups • Creating a community that appeals to multiple generations • Focusing on a short goal while keeping the bigger picture in mind • Provide updates of activities in the parks • Provide honest feedback with the Parks & Recreation Department • Keep strategic planning • Keep looking at plans • Seek community input • Evaluate whether the parks are serving all Edina residents • Ensure every member has a chance to voice their opinion • Keep updates on current projects — progress • Keep doing financial impact presentations • Driving work plan ideas • New board member orientation • Skip a month a year of meetings • Educate members on 2016-17 capital plan • Provide thoughtful recommendations to the City Council • Develop facility • Work plan meetings for important topics • Be respectful of board members time and length of meetings • • Be willing to listen to other board member comments 2 • Stop doing: • Don't revisit what has already been decided • Stop overpromising • Stop printing out Park Board materials • Stop overscheduling the agenda • Don't add agenda items not ready for Park Board review • Long presentations • Involve in financial plans or discussions • Retracting a decision made at a meeting • Ask opinions about issues that have already been decided by city leadership • Relying heavily on outside consultants Start doing: • Analyze effectiveness of Park Board • Using website more • Allocating resources to complete 2015 work projects • Seeing more finance in making decisions • Key metrics that track performance • Alternative communication vehicle to tell what's going on • Share plans for parks • Actively solicit more input from board members for their opinions • Start systematically providing information on parks • More Park Board meetings in park facilities • • Update status reports • Provide more info — welcome to new residents about the parks • Add small amount of time at each meeting for strategic plan discussions • Using standard forms of advisory board communications for all discussion items on agenda • Work on projects outside the meetings • Specific actions set for the work plan • Set proposed agenda times and keep the time so time is not wasted • Facility reports from Park Board members • Calendar for year of key agenda items each month • Reduce the number of comments a member can make Mr. McCormick asked the groups to organize the comments into categories. He noted categories could include financials, facilities, updates, communicating, work plan, open dialogue, focus on community, meeting process rules, decision making, ideas around topics for consideration, etc. Ms. Kattreh provided information on the following items: Parks Open Spaces and Trails — Ms. Kattreh indicated that when they look at branding, signage and way -finding there currently is $500,000 in park dedication fees that have been specifically allocated by the City Council to a signage project. She stated this is something that would be a really great Park Board initiative. She noted some things were identified for branding and way -finding in the Strategic Plan and they can continue to explore those areas as well marketing the parks and programs to make residents more aware of offerings. She indicated that she is interested in how residents find out about is what is going on as well as what the Park Board can do better. Recreation Facilities — Ms. Kattreh indicated she would like to think about a business management model for enterprise facilities; what should the enterprise facilities look like. She asked as a resident what you expect the city to be able to cover in terms of the operating expenses. Should the facilities • and parks start to be more commercialized? Do you want the city to start more partnerships? Do you want the parks to remain more natural? Do you want to see more advertising? Do you have any ideas of what you would like our parks to look like and how does that impact our financial sustainability? Do we have any infrastructure that is missing such as education and natural resources? Recreation Programs — She asked what the city can do to get more residents participating in their programs. If they want to impact 30-35% of all residents how can they do that from a marketing perspective? What age groups are we missing? How can we attract those people that we are not being able to reach with programs? Ms. Kattreh informed the Park Board that Max Galaxy, the new registration program, was rolled out last Monday. Chair Gieseke stated a while ago they were trying to compare themselves to top tier communities and asked what number makes them excellent? Ms. Kattreh replied that 35 is a good number in terms of benchmarking. Ms. Kattreh indicated they can continue with the survey; however, she is not completely confident with the survey that was done last time and noted they will continue to analyze that type of information. Ms. Kattreh asked if there are any trends they are missing as far as recreation programs. Mr. McCormick separated the Park Board members into three groups and each group had two focus areas to discuss. . GrouD I — Parks. Open Spaces and Trails -_Members Jacobson, Nelson and Strother (staff/Susan Faus) - Retreat focus: 1. Develop, refine and implement branding, signage and way finding plan included in the Strategic Plan. 2. Market parks and programs throughout the city to inform residents of offerings. GrouD 2 — Recreational Facilities — Members_ McCormick, lones, Good, Segreto (staff/Patty McGrath) — Retreat focus: 1. Implement a policy -supported business management model for enterprise facilities that addresses a cost recovery model toward financial sustainability. 2. Explore the development of innovative infrastructure in the park system to support environmental education and natural resource planning. GrouD 3 — Recreational Programs — Members Gieseke, Greene, Cella, Colwell (staff/Amanda Clarke) — Retreat focus: 1. Attract 30-35% of all Edina residents to experience organized recreation programs through Edina Parks & Recreation Department by identifying and closing programming gaps. 2. Keep up with evolving needs and trends by re-evaluating offered programs and interest levels. Member Nelson reviewed Group I's items: • Update signage in the parks and make sure all parks are labeled • Provide maps of parks, connections to other parks and amenities in each park • Show the trail system connecting parks • • Add park information to new resident welcome package as well as information for "potential" new residents • Welcome to different neighborhoods 4 • • Put mile markers on trails • Market the Edina Parks & Recreation Department along with City of Edina logo, etc. • Social media • Marketing print information at public locations within the city • Advocates for the city using apps Member Good commented that he really likes the idea of an app. Member Jones suggested the app be a way for residents to advise the city of items needing attention within the city. Member Good reviewed Group 2's items: • Create a distinct and common business plan to utilize the strengths of the facilities • Determine the purpose of each facility • Who is the audience and what is the market • What organization/talent does it take to run that facility • What is the cost to break even • Facility marketing • Form more commercial relationships; where are opportunities to make a creative relationship • Pilot specific fundraisers for specific enterprise facilities; if it works, replicate to other parks • Have a regular report back to the Park Board; knowledge level is pretty thin • If this type of a model is being implemented how is it reported back to the Park Board on a regular basis • There are significant gaps financially between the different facilities such as the Art Center and how do we close that gap • • Each facility would have a different revenue model • There is a Resource Manager position in the strategic plan perhaps in 2017 and if we really want to drive this we need the Resource Manager in place. Do we accelerate the hire of that position? Let's get going on developing a job description, a work plan for that position and explore what other excellent communities do in this area — outside of Twin Cities, outside of Minnesota • Engage with external resources — master watershed managers and master naturalists who are looking to engage with communities on a volunteer basis to help the communities • Develop unique program activities utilizing those resources; may not be long extended programs • Focus on open spaces • Identify areas for protection and leave them as natural spaces for people that enjoy that environment • Market for what it is • Look for opportunities for nature trails • Foster relationships with environmental organizations. Audubon Society for example • City wide plan to improve pollinator's habitat and education Member Cella reviewed Group 3's items: • Attract 30-35% of Edina residents; this could be in one or two age groups • Break down the age groups and figure out what makes sense • Get best possible data on how we are doing with the age groups right now (there probably is • not a lot of good programming for all age groups) • Once age groups are identified determine how we are meeting their needs right now • What do the groups we aren't meeting the needs of want as far as programs • What are other cities doing for the different age groups; it may be a communication issue • Build awareness of programs • • Offer new residents through their welcome packet possibly coupons for one or two free programs within the city • Have new programs offered at a discount when offered for the first time as a pilot program • Get a better handle on the programming • Make sure there is no overlap with other programs • Make sure all groups know who they are programming for • More centralized programming • Target marketing of programs. Member Nelson stated her kids love the summer programming and some programming of non -school days would be popular. • Develop a comprehensive list of all programs • Which age group is targeted for the programs • Hoping the new database going forward would give good data about participation rates • Explore more partnerships with people like Three Rivers Park District, School District, etc. • How can we leverage their expertise with programming; that might be a way to solve some of the issues of lapses in programming during non -school days • Look at the new trends • See what other areas are doing • Designate one park for pilot programs • Pickup soccer or baseball games • How do we measure the success of the programs; a survey will be sent out to all families who • participated in the programs Ms. Faus indicated they have,not done a good job for the past ten years of getting feedback on their programs. She pointed out there has been discussion about creating business plans for the programs and we will be looking at that for next year. Member Good suggested someone going to the program and asking the participants in real time what they like, etc. Member Cella replied that it's difficult to find the opinions of the people who don't use the parks. Member Nelson stated that is where the Ambassador Program would be helpful. Discussion was held about how to work with the other commissions and boards within the city as far as programming. It was noted that transportation is another issue when looking at trails working in conjunction with the public transportation groups. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A letter dated July 14, 2015 was received from Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood, regarding the Strategic Plan that she brought before the Park Board at the July 14 Park Board meeting. VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None . IX. STAFF COMMENTS None . • x ADJOURNMENT Chair Gieseke made a motion, seconded by Member Good, to adjourn the meeting. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cellar, Segreto, Strother, McCormick, Good Motion approved. Meeting adjourned at 9:43 p.m. • • 7 • MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, August 11, 2015 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Weber and Members, Moore, McLellan, Sussman, Christiaansen, O'Brien, Birdman, Kelly, and Student Member Druckman. Absent were members Pearson, Sussman, and Student Member Otness. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Birdman moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member McLellan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES July 14, 2015 Member Kelly moved approval of the minutes from the July 14`h meeting. Member McLellan • seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS - None VII. OTHER BUSINESS A. 2015 Work Plan Update & B. 2016 Work Plan Preparation: The board reviewed the 2015 work plan to evaluate the tasks that have been accomplished, those yet to be accomplished in 2015, as well as the tasks that should be continued to the 2016 work plan. The Seven 2015 initiatives were classified as follows: Completed: • Designate 6901 Dakota Trail and Edina Heritage Landmark property • Establish a working group to explore educational opportunities linked to Edina's heritage preservation program during preservation month. (Work will commence September 2015) • Add to resources publically available on topics such as architecture and technical advice • - raising community awareness through education. (An on-going initiative.) Edina Heritage Preservation Board . Minutes August 11, 2015 1. CCD Walking Tour created by student member Peter Otness added to CCD web page and Edina Historical Society's resources. 2. Member Peter Sussman led a tour of the Adath Yeshurun Cemetery identifying its significance to the history of Edina. By popular demand, a 2nd tour is scheduled for Sunday, October I It' at 2:00 p.m. 3. Member Ryan Weber wrote a 4 -part series entitled "Is Demolition Allowed in the Country Club District?" for the city's Advisory Blog to educate the public on how the District's plan of treatment is managed by the HPB. To be completed in 2015: • Update Edina Historic Context Study: Adding most recent data from the Country Club District, Morningside Bungalow Study, and Suburban Development Study. To be completed this Fall by Consultant Robert Vogel without the need for additional funding. • Designate 6909 Hillcrest Lane, the Moore House an Edina Heritage Landmark District (EHLD) property. To be completed by year end 2015. Carry over to 2016: • Designate the Wooddale Bridge (on Wooddale Avenue in front of St. Stephens Church) • an Edina Heritage Landmark District (EHLD) property. We have been waiting for MnDOT to complete a National Register of Historic Places application underway as part of their management plan for all bridges in their jurisdiction. Apparently, MnDOT's project has stalled, thus the HPB has decided to move forward with this proposed local designation in 2016. • Educational Opportunities subcommittee to complete their work by February 2016, for Preservation Month, May 2016. • Explore the History of Your Home subcommittee - Encourage public engagement to record the history of their homes using an example of the MNSHPO's Placeography.org site. A discussion ensued amongst the HPB with the Explore the History of Your Home subcommittee providing an update for new HPB members on the original goal of providing a means by which the public could download interesting photos, articles, and facts about their homes into a Wikipedia type site. Currently the Minnesota Historical Society provides the site "Placeography.org" offering such a service. Member Birdman explained the impetus of the subcommittee was to move beyond a focus on the Country Club District and Morningside; to provide an opportunity for any interested property owner to engage in the historic documentation of their own property. . Committee members observed that they had not met for a while, but will re-engage to provide information for the board in 2016. 2 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes •August 11, 2015 New 2016 initiatives: The board discussed the following proposed initiatives to add to the 2016 work plan: • Create an Edina historical fact sheet to be included in the "Welcome Packet" provided for new property owners. • Add properties to the list of those designated as eligible for Edina Heritage Landmark nomination. • Propose the City Council add at least one property to the list of properties identified as Edina Heritage Landmarks. The Board also brainstormed about possible projects for the future including the creation of an app where one could explore Edina, finding the "Top 20 Significant Sites in the City". They agreed that would be a good project for a subcommittee. C. July 2 I st Adath Yeshurun Tour - Feedback Board members reflected on the July 21 st tour of the Adath Yeshurun Cemetery, commenting that Member Sussman did an excellent job of conducting the tour - conveying very interesting information to a large group very effectively. Planner Repya advised the board that the tour was so well received, and since there were people who were unable to attend the July tour, a second tour of the cemetery will again be led by Member Sussman on Sunday, October I Ith at 2:00 p.m. The board agreed that tours such as this are a great way to get the public engaged in learning about the city's history. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS - None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Moore reported on the following upcoming opportunities: • The Edina Historical Society's Annual Historic House Tour will take place on September 13, 2015 and will include three homes designed by renowned architect, John Howe (a draftsman under Frank Lloyd Wright). Two of the homes are in Edina and a third is located in Bloomington. • The Minnesota Historical Society's new exhibit entitled "Suburbia" will open in October and run through March, 2016. Focusing on post World War 11, the exhibit will include artifacts from Southdale which they borrowed from the Edina Historical Society. X. STAFF COMMENTS A. Oskam House, 6901 Dakota Trail - Received Landmark Designation iPlanner Repya reported that on August St' the City Council held the public hearing to add the Edina Heritage Landmark District (EHLD) overlay zoning designation to the Oskam House. The 3 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes August 11, 2015 proposal was very well received and passed unanimously. Ms. Repya added that Mrs. Oskam was very pleased with the outcome, and appreciated the work of the HPB, Staff and Consultant Vogel. B. September 1, 2015 Work Session with City Council Rescheduled to December 15, 2015 Planner Repya alerted the board that the annual work session with the City Council was scheduled for Tuesday, September I't at 5:00 p.m., however has been rescheduled to Tuesday, December 15th which was the date that worked best for the HPB membership. C. Student Member Joe Druckman' s last meeting Planner Repya reported that this would be student member Joe Druckman' s last meeting, and she wanted to convey her pleasure in working with him, noting that his willingness to be engaged with the work of the board provided a lot of value. The board shared Ms. Repya's sentiments and thanked Joe for his service, wishing him the best as he enters Carlton College this fall. Student Member Druckman expressed his pleasure serving on the board, pointing out that prior to his experiences with the HPB, Edina was just a town he lived in, however now he really feels as though he belongs. XI. NEXT MEETING DATE September 8, 2015 XII. ADJOURNMENT Member McLellan moved for adjournment at 8:00 p.m. Member Birdman seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, JoYc&RepYa • IS Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w/Quorum Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Type "I" under the month on the meetings' line. Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. J I F MI AlM Cancelled Meeting JI JI A S1 01 NJ D Work Session Work Session J# of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 11 1 11 11 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% 6 NAME nm0 Weber, Ryan TERM 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 11 11 11 (Enter Date) 11 1 1 (Enter Date) I 1 8 100% O'Brien, Tim 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% Christiaansen, Jennifer Mellom, Joyce Moore, Bob 3/1/2018 3/1/2018 3/1/2018 1 1 1 11 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 1 7 1 8 88% 13% 100% Sussman, Peter 3/1/2018 1 11 1 1 1 1 6 75% McLellan, Bruce 2/1/20171 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Birdman, Michael 3/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Kelly, Karen Pearson, Colleen 3/1/2016 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% 1 11 1 1 1 5 83% Druckman, Joe 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Otness, Peter 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Regular Meeting w/Quorum Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Type "I" under the month on the meetings' line. Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "l " under the month on the meetings' line. Type "I" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously -scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. • MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JULY 21, 2015 9:41 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 9:41 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the Meeting Agenda tabling Item VI. Amendment To Affordable Housing to a future meeitng. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 17,201S APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Staunton, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for June 17, 2015. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. • AMENDMENT TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING TABLED Chair Hovland noted the item had been tabled with the adoption of the agenda. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-04 AUTHORIZING INTERFUND LOAN — PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT. Mayor Hovland noted the proposed resolution was the same action taken by the City Council and adoption will allow reimbursement of administration costs after tax revenue begins to be collection in 2018. Following a brief discussion Commissioner Swenson made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Stewart adopting Resolution No. 2015-04 authorizing an interfund loan for administrative costs from the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, • Page I Scott Neal, Executive Director /A O y ' \CORF'ORf'K/ 1888 To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: V. The Recommended Bid is From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering OX Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Date: September 16, 2015 Subject: Request For Purchase — Southdale Area Traffic Model and Transportation Study Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: August 31, 2015 Company: WSB & Associates, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: WSB & Associates, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: N/A Amount of Quote or Bid: $63,577.00 $63,577.00 The Southdale area is a vital hub of commercial, health care and residential activity for Edina and surrounding communities. Based on recently completed investments in the area and the high interest level for additional redevelopment of aging properties in the area, an update to our traffic model and a transportation study is warranted. This model will allow the City to more fully evaluate the impact of proposed land use and transportation changes in the area. Based on the information generated, the City should be able to more clearly advocate for additional improvements by partners at the County, Regional and State levels. In 2008, WSB assisted the City in the development of the original traffic model for the Southdale Area. This project will update that model and prepare a transportation analysis for two land use density scenarios. The results of the study will document the traffic needs on the roadways and analyze roadway geometrics and traffic control improvements required to accommodate future traffic growth. It will also analyze the existing and future pedestrian and bicycle system needs. Hennepin County recently completed intersection traffic movement counts on intersections along France and York Avenues. This information will be available to us and thus reduces the cost of our project. The project is listed in the Capital Improvement Plan under CIP # 15-167 with a total budget of $125,000. Funding for the project will be utilized from the Centennial Lakes TIF District. Staff recommends approving the proposal with WSB & Associates, Inc. Attachment Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal GAMACENTRAL SVCS\TRANSPORTATION DIV\Tmnsportation Studies\Southdale Tmnsportion Study\MISC\Item V. RFP.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • • A& WSB - Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction t Associates, Inc. August 31, 2015 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineer Edina Public Works 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55349 Re: Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Dear Mr. Millner: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4800 Fax: 763 541-1700 WSB & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to update the traffic and transportation models and prepare a transportation study for the Southdale area. As we have discussed, the project will involve updating the existing Synchro/SimTraffic traffic models in the Southdale area, updating the CUBE transportation planning model for the entire City and preparation of a transportation analysis for two land use density scenarios in the Southdale area. The study area was expanded to include area north of TH 62. A scope of works has been developed and is attached for your information. The estimated cost for the planning and engineering services will be based on our current hourly rates, and is estimated at $63,577. Also included is a breakdown of cost by task and the proposed schedule which assumes completion of the project by mid-February 2016. If the proposed Scope of Work and the associated fee appear to be appropriate, please sign a copy of the proposal and return to me at your earliest convenience. We will proceed immediately upon receipt of the signed contract. Thank you for consideration of WSB & Associates, Inc. for these professional planning and engineering services. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at 763-287-7183. Sincerely, WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. • Charles T. Rickart, PE, PTOE Principal/Project Manager CITY OF EDINA Authorized Signature Its Date Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud C...,I (�nnnrFiini+v FmnlnvAr 0 Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study SCOPE OF WORK UNDERSTANDING In 2008 WSB assisted the City in the development of a traffic model for the Southeast area (Southdale) of the City. The study area was bounded by TH 62 (Crosstown) on the north, the Richfield/Edina border on the east, the Bloomington/Edina border on the south and TH 100 on the west. The model included 40 signalized intersections, 20 un -signalized intersections, and three roundabouts. The purpose in developing the model was to provide a consistent baseline for traffic analysis and to provide continuously updated results to help gauge the compound effect of multiple developments in the Southdale area. Since the model was completed, it has been used by several developers and the City in reviewing the area traffic impacts of proposed development. Although, the model has been continually updated with traffic characteristics from approved developments the original traffic conditions were based on 2007 traffic counts. It is now in need of updating and recalibration with new traffic counts. Also in 2008 WSB assisted the City in preparation of the Transportation Plan in conjunction with • the Comprehensive Plan update. As part of the Transportation Plan a city wide transportation planning model was developed for the existing and future land use projections. Sense the preparation of the land use projections in the Transportation Plan density changes have occurred in the Southdale area. In addition questions of the appropriate density have been asked for the area specifically on the west side of France Avenue. • In March of 2015 the City Council appointed a working group that developed the Working Principles for the France Avenue Southdale Area. These principals will serve as a tool to guide the development process for the whole Southdale area, and demonstrate methods that might be used during the Comprehensive Plan update in 2018. In order to provide data to assist in moving this process to the next stages, development of transportation forecasts should be completed. In discussions with City staff it was determined that the study area be expanded to include the area north of TH 62 to W 6e Street. Based on our understanding of the existing traffic and transportation models and the issues and concerns within the Southdale area we have developed the following work tasks to prepare the model updates and transportation study. Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal rage i City Of Edina 0 WORK TASKS Task 1 — Project Management This task includes planning and coordination of all work tasks, establishing and monitoring of the budget, communication with City Staff, and periodic meetings with staff on the project status. Task 2 — Data Collection Available traffic and land use data will be collected from the City of Edina, Hennepin County and MnDOT. This will include but not limited to; existing traffic volume data, traffic signal timing plans, approved development plans, roadway improvement plans, existing land use (population, households and employment) data, forecasted land use data, etc. In addition a field review to update and document the existing conditions will be conducted. In order to calibrate the traffic models additional traffic volume counts will be collected by WSB personnel. It is assumed that up to 20 intersection turning movement counts will be collected during the weekday AM peak hour, weekday PM peak hour, Saturday peak hour and the weekday off-peak hour. In addition up to 20 roadway segment, 48 hour directional average daily traffic counts would be collected. In conjunction with the vehicle traffic counting, pedestrian and bike counts will be conducted at up to 10 locations within the Southdale study area. Video cameras will be utilized in these • locations to document the existing pedestrian and bike utilization. The exact number and location of the counts will be determined after available data is received and reviewed. Task 3 — Traffic Model Update A Synchro/SimTraffic model has been prepared which includes 40 signalized intersections, 20 un -signalized intersections and 3 roundabouts. This model will be updated using the new traffic volume information, updated roadway configuration and signal timing information collected as part of Task 2. This task will also include expanding the model study area to include the area north of TH 62 to W 60th Street. It is anticipated that an additional 3 signalized intersections, 5 un -signalized intersections and 2 roundabouts will be added to the roadway network. The results of this task will be an updated 2015 base area model that can be used to evaluate traffic impacts as new development is proposed in the Southdale area. Task 4 — Transportation Plan Model Update The City's current Transportation Plan includes traffic projections to the year 2030. These projections are based on existing and future land use within the City. The CUBE transportation planning model was used to prepare the forecasts using the Metropolitan Councils roadway and land use data as the base and then modified for the City of Edina. Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Page 2 City Of Edina This task will include updating the current model and projecting traffic to the year 2040 for the . entire City using the existing Comprehensive plan land use (population, households and employment). For the Southdale area traffic forecasts will be prepared for an alternative land use scenario increasing the density to 50 units per acre. This information will then be used to determine the anticipated future traffic impacts on the area roadways (Task 5). Task 5 — Traffic Operational Analysis An operational analysis will be prepared using the area Synchro/SimTraffic model updated in Task 3. The future 2040 traffic conditions will be based on the forecasts developed as part of Task 4 and will evaluate two scenarios; the current Comprehensive Plan land use and the increased density land use. The analysis will document the traffic needs on the roadways in the Southdale area. This will include an analysis documenting the roadway geometric and traffic control improvements required in the area to accommodate existing and future traffic growth. Task 6 - Pedestrian and Bicycle Analysis An analysis of the existing and future pedestrian and bicycle system in the Southdale study area will be conducted. The analysis will include review of the local/regional system and identification of future connections or revisions based on the guidelines and requirements in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Task 7 — Meetings • It is anticipated that up to six (6) coordination meetings will held with the City. These will include the following: • • City Staff (3) • Transportation Commission (1) • Planning Commission (1) • City Council Work Session(1) Should additional meetings be required they would be billed at our standard hourly rates. Task 8 - Report Preparation / Model Documentation WSB will prepare a memorandum report documenting the methodologies and analysis from the above tasks including any recommendations for roadway geometric or traffic control improvements. WSB would submit a draft report to the City for their review. The draft report will be presented to the Edina Transportation Commission, Planning Commission and City Council for review. WSB would then prepare a final report to incorporate any comments received from the City. Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Page 3 City Of Edina 9 0 ESTIMATED COST The estimated cost is based on the above scope of services. WSB & Associates, Inc. will bill for the actual hours worked at each employee classification times the current WSB hourly rates for that employee classification up to the maximum of $63,577. SCHEDULE City Approves Proposal.................................................................................... September 15, 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of September 21, 2015 Data Collection / Traffic Counts............................................................. September / October 2015 Traffic Model Update..............................................................................October / November 2015 Transportation Model Update..................................................................October / November 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of November 16, 2015 Traffic Operations Analysis................................................................. November / December 2015 DraftReport ....................................................................................................... December 11, 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of December 28, 2015 TACMeeting......................................................................................................... January 21, 2016 Planning Commission............................................................................................ January 27, 2016 City Council Work Session................................................................................... February 2, 2016 FinalReport ......................................................................................................... February 12, 2016 Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Page 4 City Of Edina Tasks Edina Cost Task 1 —Project Management $4,704 Task 2 — Data Collection $14,456 Task 3 — Traffic Model Update $9,975 Task 4 — Transportation Planning Model Update $12,264 Task 5 — Traffic Operations Analysis $9,387 Task 6 — Pedestrian / Bike Analysis $5,502 Task 7 — Meetings $3,258 Task 8 — Report Preparation $3,531 Total Labor Cost $63,077.00 Expenses (Mileage, Printing, etc) $500.00 Total Project Cost $63,577.00 SCHEDULE City Approves Proposal.................................................................................... September 15, 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of September 21, 2015 Data Collection / Traffic Counts............................................................. September / October 2015 Traffic Model Update..............................................................................October / November 2015 Transportation Model Update..................................................................October / November 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of November 16, 2015 Traffic Operations Analysis................................................................. November / December 2015 DraftReport ....................................................................................................... December 11, 2015 Meeting with City Staff...................................................................... Week of December 28, 2015 TACMeeting......................................................................................................... January 21, 2016 Planning Commission............................................................................................ January 27, 2016 City Council Work Session................................................................................... February 2, 2016 FinalReport ......................................................................................................... February 12, 2016 Southdale Area Model Update and Transportation Study Proposal Page 4 City Of Edina