Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-11-17 City Council Meetng
Age n da Cit y Cou n ci l Meeti n g Ci ty of Edi n a, Mi n n esota City Cou n ci l Ch ambers Tuesda y, Nove mbe r 1 7 , 2 0 1 5 7 :00 PM I.Cal l To Order II.Ro l l Cal l III.Approval o f Meeti ng Agenda IV.Adopti o n of Co nsent Agenda Al l agenda i tems l i sted o n the co nsent agenda are consi dered ro uti ne and w i l l be enacted by o ne mo ti o n. There w i l l be no separate di scussi on of such i tems unl ess requested to be removed fro m the Co nsent Agenda by a Member o f the Ci ty Counci l . In such cases the i tem wi l l be remo ved from the Consent Agenda and consi dered i mmedi atel y fo l l ow i ng the adopti o n of the Co nsent Agenda. (Favo rabl e rol l cal l vo te o f maj o ri ty of Co unci l Members present to approve.) A.Appro ve Mi nutes of November 4, 2015 Ci ty Co unci l Regul ar Meeti ng and November 4, 2015 Work Sessi o n Meeti ng B.Recei ve Payment o f Cl ai ms As Per: Pre-Li st D ated, 10/29/2015 TOTAL: $3,050,016.52 And Per Pre-L i st Dated 11/05/2015 TOTAL: $1,149,195.62 and Credi t Card Transacti o ns 07/26/15 - 08/24/15 TOTAL: $38,810.21 C.Appro ve New On-Sal e Wi ne and Beer Li censes, Z Ital i ano , 1705 Southdal e Center D.2016 Cal endar Of Meeti ng D ates E.Reso l uti on No . 2015-114 Recei vi ng Engi neeri ng Studi es fo r 2016 Nei ghborho o d Roadw ay Reco nstructi on Proj ects F.Request fo r Purchase: Moto ro l a MCC7500 Radi o Co nso l es fo r our 911 Co mmuni cati ons Center G.2015 Edi na Communi ty Co unci l Appo i ntments H.Request fo r Purchase: Edi nborough Park Securi ty Camera Repl acement I.Request fo r Purchase: Engi neeri ng Servi ces for Sani tary Capaci ty Eval uati o n J.Traffi c Safety Repo rt o f Octo ber 7, 2015 K.Request fo r Purchase: Engi neeri ng Servi ces for Val l ey Vi ew Rd Bi ke L ane Extensi on V.Speci al Recogni ti o ns And Presentati o ns A.Jan Cal l i so n, Hennepi n County Commi ssi o ner B.Grandvi ew Di stri ct Transpo rtati on Study C.Speak Up, Edi na October D i scussi o n VI.Communi ty Comment Duri ng "Co mmuni ty Comment," the Ci ty Co unci l w i l l i nvi te resi dents to share new i ssues o r concerns that haven't been co nsi dered i n the past 30 days by the Counci l or w hi ch aren't sl ated for future co nsi derati o n. Indi vi dual s must l i mi t thei r co mments to three mi nutes. The Mayo r may l i mi t the number o f speakers on the same i ssue i n the i nterest of ti me and topi c. General l y speaki ng, i tems that are el sew here o n to ni ght's agenda may not be addressed duri ng Co mmuni ty Comment. Indi vi dual s shoul d not expect the Mayor o r Counci l to respond to thei r comments toni ght. Instead the Counci l mi ght refer the matter to staff for consi derati o n at a future meeti ng. VII.Reports/Reco mmendati o ns: (Favorabl e vote of majori ty o f Counci l Members present to approve except w here noted) A.Reso l uti on No . 2015-113: Deni al o f a Si te Pl an w i th Vari ances fo r Bank o f Ameri ca, 6868 France Avenue B.Grandvi ew Faci l i ty Operati onal and Feasi bi l i ty Study C.Request fo r Purchase: Grandvi ew Faci l i ty Operati onal and Feasi bi l i ty Study D.Reso l uti on No . 2015-116: Fi nal Pl at & Tree Preservati o n Easement 6209 Crest Lane for Ri dge Creek Homes E.Reso l uti on No . 2015-115: Accepti ng Vari o us Grants & D o nati o ns VIII.Correspo ndence And Peti ti ons A.Co rrespondence B.Mi nutes 1.Mi nutes: Pl anni ng Commi ssi on, Octo ber 14, 2015 2.Mi nutes: Pl anni ng Commi ssi on, September 30, 2015 3.Mi nutes: Heri tage Preservati o n Bo ard, Octo ber 13, 2015 4.Mi nutes: Park Board, Octo ber 13, 2015 IX.Avi ati on No i se Update X.Mayo r and Co unci l Comments XI.Manager's Co mments XII.Schedul e o f Meeti ngs, Events & D ates As Of No vember 17, 2015 XIII.Adj o urnment AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUT HORIT Y I.Cal l to Order II.Ro l l Cal l III.Approval Of Agenda IV.Approve Mi nutes Of October 20, 2015 HRA Meeti ng V.Request Fo r Purchase: Pro fessi o nal Servi ces Contract Greater Southdal e Area Pl anni ng Study – Phase 2 VI.Request for Purchase Engi neeri ng Servi ces for Val l ey Vi ew Rd Bi ke Lane Extensi on VII.Adj o urnment T he City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes of November 4, 2015 City Council Regular Meeting and November 4, 2015 W ork Session Meeting CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: INT RODUCT ION: AT TACHMENT S: Description Draft November 4, 2015 Work Session Minutes Draft November 4, 2015 Regular Meeting Minutes MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 4, 2015 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was: Members Brindle, Staunton S t e w a r t , S w e n s o n a n d M a y o r Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communication & Technology Services Director;; Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director; Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director; MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator; Kay McAloney, Human Resources Director; Devin Massopust, City Manager Fellow; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Dave Nelson, Police Chief; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; Eric Roggeman, Finance Director; Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Tom Schmitz, Fire Chief; and Cary Teague, Community Development Director. 2016-2017 BUDGET Manager Neal introduced Finance Director Roggeman who presented the draft 2016-2017 Budget along with the projected levy for 2016. Mr. Roggeman reviewed the process followed to arrive at the proposed budget. He noted the Council sets work plan themes and goals. The even year or the first year of the biennial budget the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is reviewed in detail. Themes for 2016-2017 included: focused redevelopment; future planning, intergovernmental relations, transportation and infrastructure and enterprise stability. Staff prepared a draft budget using the priority themes and goals. Mr. Roggeman outlined the timeline followed in developing the budget, noting that the Council had adopted their preliminary levy in September and will adopt their final 2016 property tax levy and budget in December. The Council reviewed and discussed possible budget scenarios and gave their opinions on the draft budget. Each member of the Council will review the proposed budget and the list of possible reductions that will be communicated to Mr. Neal. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 17, 2015 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 4, 2015 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of October 20, 2015 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 15, 2015, and consisting of 32 pages; General Fund $494,210.74; Police Special Revenue $8,841.22; Working Capital Fund $20,819.50; Equipment Replacement Fund $12,103.37; Cando Fund $18,286.37; Art Center Fund $266.79; Aquatic Center Fund $147.26; Golf Course Fund $65,217.70; Ice Arena Fund $13,383.12; Sports Dome Fund $36,055.70; Edinborough Park Fund $10,123.66; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $10,582.11; Liquor Fund $218,288.63; Utility Fund $73,423.17; Storm Sewer Fund $8,289.07; Recycling Fund $36,187.38; PSTF Agency Fund $1,316.38; Payroll Fund $10,727.26; TOTAL $1,038,269.42 and for receipt of payment of claims dated October 22, 2015, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $249,823.22; Police Special Revenue $20,900.26; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $5,349.00; Arts and Culture Fund $2,350.00; Working Capital Fund $97,424.59; Equipment Replacement Fund $88,927.00; Art Center Fund $1,245.31; Golf Dome Fund $9,319.53; Aquatic Center Fund $69.74; Golf Course Fund $625,080.15; Ice Arena Fund $8,000.60; Edinborough Park Fund $7,546.58; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $714.22; Liquor Fund $161,950.99; Utility Fund $139,023.06; Storm Sewer Fund $1,203.50; PSTF Agency Fund $9,217.75; Centennial TIF District $19,526.32; Grandview TIF District $71,752.63; TOTAL $1,519,284.97; and, Credit Card Transactions dated June 25 – July 26, 2015; TOTAL $53,020.54 IV.C. Request for Purchase, Well #10 Rehabilitation, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner & Sons at $20,314.00 IV.D. Authorize Participation in 2016-2017 Fuel Consortium IV.E. Approve Human Rights and Relations Bias Offense Response and Prevention Plan IV.F. Request for Purchase, Braemar Arena Surveillance Cameras, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Pro-Tec Design at $23,549.87 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 4, 2015 Page 2 IV.G. Adopt Ordinance No. 2015-23, Amending Chapter 10 of the City Code Regarding Demolition Permits IV.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2015-112, Authorizing Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement between Edina and Bloomington Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. AMENDING CHAPTER 36 REGARDING BREWERIES, TAPROOMS, WINERIES, COCKTAIL ROOMS, DISTILLERIES, AND BREWPUBS – ORDINANCE NO. 2015-21 ADOPTED Community Development Director Teague shared that the Council was being asked to hold a public hearing and consider second reading of Ordinance No. 2015-21 regarding the regulation of breweries, taprooms, wineries, cocktail rooms, distilleries, and brewpubs. The Ordinance would allow brewpubs in all Planned Commercial Zoning Districts and Mixed Development Districts. Breweries, taprooms, wineries, cocktail rooms, and distilleries would be allowed in the Planned Industrial Zoning Districts. The Ordinance included language recommended by the Council at first reading regarding food trucks. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to food truck regulations. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015- 21, Amending Chapter 36 Regarding Breweries, Taprooms, Wineries, Cocktail Rooms, Distilleries, and Brewpubs. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES FOR BANK OF AMERICA, 6868 FRANCE AVENUE – RESOLUTION NO. 2015-113 NOT ADOPTED – STAFF DIRECTED TO PREPARE FINDINGS FOR DENIAL Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the request from Bank of America to tear down the existing 3,098 square foot Think Bank and construct a new Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) Certified 7,190 square foot Bank of America with a drive through ATM at 6868 France Avenue. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 4, 2015 Page 3 Merrill Lynch would also be a tenant in the building. The request required a Site Plan approval with a front setback variance from 35 feet to 22 feet for the building, a parking stall variance from 1,738 to 1,581 spaces, a front setback variance from 35 feet to 20 feet for the drive through ATM, and a variance to allow a drive through ATM to be located on a side of a building that faces property zoned R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District. Mr. Teague presented the Site Plan and photos of the proposed building. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the project. Proponent Presentation Anita Thomas, Jones Lang LaSalle, introduced Aaron Green and Nathan Owen from Gensler Architecture and stated that they were available to answer questions from the Council. Mr. Green answered questions of the Council relating to the new design of the Merrill Lynch entrance, the design plan for the Merrill Lynch side of the building, the additional conditions from the Planning Commission, the sidewalk study, the process for LEED certification, and the materials board. Mr. Teague answered a question of the Council relating to discussions with Hennepin County concerning eliminating the free right turn in order to square up the corner, noting it was cost prohibitive. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-113, Approving a Site Plan with Variances at 6868 France Avenue to Build 7,190 Square Foot LEED Certified Bank of America, subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Grading plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Building elevations date stamped September 28 and October 1, 2015. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and a one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 4, 2015 Page 4 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 4, 2013. 6. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. 7. Bike racks must be provided to meet minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 8. The Merrill Lynch entrance on 69th Street shall be enhanced to resemble a storefront entry as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. This could be accomplished with an awning or signage at the entry. 9. The three existing islands in the parking lot north of the proposed building shall be landscaped including over-story trees. 10. Landscaping shall be added to the south side of the new parking lot that is to be west of the new building. This landscaping shall provide screening of the parking lot. 11. Boulevard trees must be included on the final landscape plan subject to review and approval of the city forester. 12. The sidewalk on the east side of Wooddale/69th Street shall be continued to the north within the limits of the proposed project. This sidewalk would eventually be continued to 66th Street upon further development on this site. Mayor Hovland seconded the motion. The Council discussed the proposal and each shared their opinions of the project. Member Staunton mentioned that he had an issue with the drive through ATM and did not believe the variances were warranted. Member Stewart indicated his dislike for the architecture. Member Swenson discussed her concern for the drive through ATM and pedestrian access and safety. Mr. Teague noted that a rejection would need to center around the requested variances. Ayes: Brindle, Hovland Nays: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson Motion failed. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, directing staff to prepare findings for denial. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Nays: Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-111 AMENDED CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF A LOT DIVISION WITH VARIANCES AT 3621 AND 3625 54TH STREET WEST – ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague explained that a condition of approval of a Lot Division with variances at 3621 and 3625 54th Street for Donnay Homes needed to be amended. Condition No. 6 stated, "The applicant shall maintain the existing shrubs per the proposed landscape plan." The landscape plans showed "shrubs;" however, the hedge along the east lot line consisted primarily of Minutes/Edina City Council/November 4, 2015 Page 5 buckthorn so the City Forester requested the hedge be removed. The applicant wished to replant the area with Rocky Mountain Junipers and a 6-foot tall cedar fence. The City did not require screening from one duplex to another, but because it was a condition of approval the plans required an amendment. Staff believed the proposed Junipers and fence would be an improvement. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council concerning the drainage plan. The Council discussed whether or not it should mandate the buckthorn be replaced with a similar type of shrub. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015- 111, Approving a Lot Division with Variances at 3621 and 3625 54th Street West, subject to the following conditions: 1. The new double dwelling shall be built per the submitted plans date stamped December 24, 2014, and January 9, 2015. 2. The 24-inch Locust and 22-inch Locust on the site shall be maintained and protected during construction. 3. The applicant shall plant an additional 4-inch Maple on each new lot to replace the 12- inch Maple that is to be removed. 4. Each unit shall have separate utility hook-ups. 5. The units will be separated by a fire-wall; and be verified by the City's building official. 6. The Buckhorn that was removed from the east lot line shall be replaced with similar plant material not noxious in nature. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-12 PROPOSED FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH XCEL ENERGY – ADOPTED Manager Neal shared that the Council approved the first reading of the proposed franchise renewal Ordinance on October 20, 2015. The Council was requested to approve second reading of Ordinance No. 2015-12, accept the October 20, 2015, letter from Mr. Patrick Cline of Xcel Energy, and direct staff to include the Xcel letter as an official addendum to the Ordinance. The Council thanked staff and Xcel Energy for working together on the agreement. Member Swenson made a motion to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015-12, Granting to Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, D/B/A Xcel Energy, its Successors and Assigns, Permission to Construct, Operate, Repair, and Maintain in the City of Edina, Minnesota, and Electric Distribution System and Transmission Lines, Including Necessary Poles, Lines, Fixtures, and Appurtenances, for the Furnishing of Electric Energy to the City, its Inhabitants, and Others, and to Use the Public Grounds and Public Ways of the City for Such Purposes. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-15 CENTERPOINT ENERGY FRANCHISE FEE INCREASE – ADOPTED Minutes/Edina City Council/November 4, 2015 Page 6 Manager Neal shared that on September 1, 2015, the Council approved the first reading of two ordinances that would increase utility franchise fees for Edina customers of Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy that were first established in 2012. The ordinances would increase the existing franchise fees for all classes of customers by $0.50 per meter per month for each utility. The new revenue would allow the City to pursue the City environmental protection and sustainability goals. Member Stewart made a motion to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015-15, Amending Ordinance No. 2012-15 A Gas Energy Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas ("CenterPoint Energy") for Providing Gas Energy Service within the City of Edina. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-16 XCEL ENERGY FRANCHISE FEE INCREASE – ADOPTED Member Stewart made a motion to grant Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015-16, Amending Ordinance No. 2015-16 Implementing an Electric Service Franchise Fee on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, D/B/A Xcel Energy, its Successors and Assigns, for Providing Electric Service within the City of Edina. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE IX.B. OPEN TO BUSINESS – 2015 UPDATE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.C. MINUTES: 1. COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 2. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 3. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XII.A. BOARD AND COMMISSION PROTOCOL XII.B. DRONE REGULATION XII.C. BRAEMAR GOLF REBRANDING XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETING AND DATES AND EVENTS AS OF NOVEMBER 4, 2015– Received Minutes/Edina City Council/November 4, 2015 Page 7 XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:26 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 17, 2015. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the November 4, 2015, meeting available. Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated, 10/29/2015 TOTAL: $3,050,016.52 And Per Pre-List Dated 11/05/2015 TOTAL: $1,149,195.62 and Credit Card Transactions 07/26/15 - 08/24/15 TOTAL: $38,810.21 Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Approve claims for payment. INT RODUCT ION: Claims information f or approval is attached. AT TACHMENT S: Description Claims Pre-List Dated 10/29/2015 TOTAL: $3,050,016.52 Claims Pre-List Dated 11/05/2015 TOTAL: $1,149,195.62 Credit Card Transactions 07/26/15-08/24/15 TOTAL: $38,810.21 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 1 Business Unit 2171 10/29/2015 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 385.49 DOOR REPAIR 00001881 385314 21510091 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 385.49 2172 10/29/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 100.40 385371 1941409 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 60.80 385567 1944541 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 161.20 2173 10/29/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 376.12 COFFEE 385483 1198492 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 376.12 2174 10/29/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 99.55 385526 50548600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 36.55 385525 50548700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 270.05 385574 50662500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 573.75 385575 50662600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.55 385578 50663000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 72.19 385573 50663200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 243.27 385577 50663700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 89.06 385576 92901700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,420.97 2176 10/29/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 48.16- RETURN 00003006 385653 CP-WO-148785-1- 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1 7.99- RETURN 385485 CP-WO-151406-1- 1600.6406 .GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1 76.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003006 385652 WO-148785-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 108.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009443 385413 WO-150057-1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 7.99 MONTHLY PLANNER 385484 WO-151406-1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 173.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 385319 WO-151834-1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 96.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 385655 WO-152349-1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 41.38 AIR DUSTERS 00004021 385654 WO-152607-1 1160.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FINANCE 448.06 2176 10/29/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 16.54 CAP ASSEMBLIES 00005822 385355 1002759 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,096.55 FUEL TANK, BANDS 00005775 385661 1004638 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,113.09 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015— Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2176 2177 10/29/2015 10/29/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. Continued... 99.74 SURFACE WARRANTY 00004375 385662 ZL56273 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,534.04 WIFI @ BGC AND PW 385416 ZS12407 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY VVIFI PROJECT 2,633.78 2178 10/29/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,540.70 385435 825362 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 123.00 385436 825363 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 906.85 385528 825405 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 49.20 385529 825406 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,619.75 2179 10/29/2015 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 3,395.00 REPLACE WATER LINE 385421 14285 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 3,395.00 2180 10/29/2015 131734 HORWITZ INC. 17,162.70 PLUMBING/HVAC 385383 APPL 8 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 17,162.70 2181 10/29/2015 129508 IMPACT 2,081.10 MAIL OCT 2015 BILLS 385500 107270 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING-FINANCE 2,081.10 2182 10/29/2015 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 1,775.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 385502 JJ5660 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,775.00 2183 10/29/2015 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 11,166.50 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 385422 670323 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 11,166.50 2184 10/29/2015 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC, 61.63 TOILET RENTAL 385453 95701 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 61.63 2185 10/29/2015 101483 MENARDS 73.25 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001827 385333 97131 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 20.97 LIGHTBULBS 00001848 385334 97654 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015— 10/29/2015 Page - 3 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2185 10/29/2015 101483 MENARDS Continued-. 13.87 PIPE, CAP, TEE 00005767 385460 97758 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 141.79 LUMBER, PINS 00001871 385456 97825 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 56.30 LUMBER, SCREWS 00001877 385457 97843 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.99 TARP CLIPS, BUNGEES 00001935 385459 97951 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 6.97 SCREWS, ACCESS PANEL 00001939 385458 98207 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 337.14 2186 10/29/2015 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 696.00 EXPANDED METAL 00005662 385338 331044 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 696.00 2187 10/29/2015 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 142.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385756 BA-413,S-128 07128.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S128 COUNTRYSIDE H SIDEWALK 136,951.82 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385756 BA-413,S-128 01413.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON 32,059.09 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385756 BA-413,S-128 05552.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Countryside H Reconstruction 70,375.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385756 BA-413,S-128 03488.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Countryside H Reconstruction 160,104.65 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385756 BA-413,S-128 04409.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Countryside H Reconstruction 47,201.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385757 BA-414,BA-415 01414.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN HOLLANDS NHOOD RECON 54,587.48 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385757 BA-414,BA-415 01415.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN HYDE PARK NHOOD RECON 36,677.60 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385757 BA-414,BA-415 03489.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 63,578.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 385757 BA-414,BA-415 04410.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 3,192.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 385755 BA-416,STS-407 07127.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S127 ARDEN PARK D SIDEWALK 110,029.24 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 385755 BA-416,STS-407 10096.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BR6 54TH STREET BRIDGE 227,990.53 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 385755 BA-416,STS-407 01412.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 366,566.72 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 385755 BA-416,STS-407 01416.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 4,113.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 385755 BA-416,STS-407 08062.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS ARDEN PARK D ST LIGHTING 23,868.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 385755 BA-416,STS-407 03487.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Arden Park D Reconstruction 90,861.02 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 385755 BA-416,STS-407 05551.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Arden Park D Reconstruction 187,246.22 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 385755 BA-416,STS-407 04407.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 54TH ST RECONSTRUCTION 1,615,546.02 2188 10/29/2015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 521.50 TIRES 00005717 385342 210199628 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 521.50 2189 10/29/2015 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. 394.88 AIRBAG, WHEEL COVER 00005698 385343 4168 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 394.88 2190 10/29/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015-- 10/29/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 4 Business Unit 2190 10/29/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Continued... 563.52 GLOVES, DISINFECTANT 00002274 385516 8405 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 657.10 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 00002275 385514 8497 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 754.08 CUTLERY SETS 385515 8500 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 426.24 COLD CUPS, LIDS, HOT CUPS 385517 8501 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 2,400.94 2191 10/29/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 147.80 ENVELOPES 385430 88113 1550.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 58.50 BUSINESS CARDS 385429 88114 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 48.50 BUSINESS CARDS 385706 88139 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 254.80 2192 10/29/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 189.85 PARTS FOR UTLEY PK HEATERS 00005719 385345 S3153727.001 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 143.53 BRASS NIPPLES 00001858 385466 S3156436.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 333.38 2193 10/29/2015 101015 STREICHERS 359.98 UNIFORMS 00003679 385520 11175700 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 359.98 2194 10/29/2015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 18.12 BLADES 00005823 385368 112192 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 148.50 LOCK 00005824 385468 112609 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104.12 HANDLE 00005826 385467 113316 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 270.74 2195 10/29/2015 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 67.04 0-RING, SEAL 385369 6760802 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.90 FILTERS 00005726 385469 6827864 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.94 2196 10/29/2015 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 23.04 SPRING 00005701 385347 J103261 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.04 2197 10/29/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 129.00 385377 0135277-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 108.50 385635 0135903-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 237.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015— Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2197 2198 10/29/2015 10/29/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 465.90 385557 407296-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 599.87 385636 407436-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,065.77 398415 10/29/2015 125153 A.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP. 2,593.50 STRUCTURAL STEEL 385381 34046-4 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 2,593.50 398416 10/29/2015 137466 Al JANITORIAL SUPPLY 131.26 LIFT STATION CLEANER 00001888 385353 A1516054 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 131.26 398417 10/29/2015 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 270.00 DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 385740 102215 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 270.00 398418 10/29/2015 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 901.24 GOLF BALLS 385647 901485512 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 901.24 398419 10/29/2015 136837 AESHLIMAN PLUMBING INC. 11,958.60 PLUMBING 385724 THREE 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 11,958.60 398420 10/29/2015 137465 AIRSAGE 3,000.00 MARKETING RESEARCH 385315 7-5-D634 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 3,000.00 MARKETING RESEARCH 385315 7-5-D634 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 3,000.00 MARKETING RESEARCH 385315 7-5-D634 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 9,000.00 398421 10/29/2015 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 248.90 COFFEE 385482 43506 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 248.90 398422 10/29/2015 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 785.27 COPIER PAPER 385316 10451809-00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 785.27 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 6 Business Unit 398424 10/29/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 793.95 385372 3060706 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,137.75 385569 30618292 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 89.00 385570 3061890 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 805.50 385571 3061891 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 774.75 385568 3061893 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,600.95 398425 10/29/2015 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 500.00 BOOM INSPECTIONS 385317 10153861 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 500.00 398426 10/29/2015 129512 BAERTSCHI, PAUL 155.00 MN POLICE BRIEFS 385318 SUBSCRIPTION 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 155.00 398427 10/29/2015 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 63.88 BATTERIES 00001961 385649 018-386192 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 63.88 398428 10/29/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 198.00 385572 3997 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 198.00 398429 10/29/2015 105833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 485.00 PACKING 00001783 385650 20597 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 485.00 398430 10/29/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 118.50 385579 255293 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 118.50 398431 10/29/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 126.95 COFFEE 385651 T80838 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 126.95 398432 10/29/2015 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 11.99 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 385656 102315 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 23.58 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 385656 102315 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 35.57 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015-- 10/29/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 7 Business Unit 398433 10/29/2015 122599 BIOLAWN Continued... 115.00 FALLAPPLICATION 385486 94016 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 115.00 398434 10/29/2015 125209 BISEK, KATIE 193.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 385657 102215 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 193.20 398435 10/29/2015 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 33,349.36 HOT MIX 385658 24865 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1,500.00 HOT MIX 385658 24865 5921.6518 BLACKTOP SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2,000.00 HOT MIX 385658 24865 5923.6518 BLACKTOP COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,000.00 HOT MIX 385658 24865 5911.6518 BLACKTOP WELL PUMPS 9,100.00 HOT MIX 385658 24865 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 2,000.00 HOT MIX 385658 24865 5934.6518 BLACKTOP STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 50,949.36 398436 10/29/2015 137480 BIXLER, JOHN 145.00 SCOTCH EVENT 385659 102215 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 145.00 398437 10/29/2015 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 311.16 ART SUPPLIES 00009444 385414 5081306 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 311.16 398438 10/29/2015 104404 BLUE EARTH COUNTY 1,000.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 385660 102615 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 1,000.00 398439 10/29/2015 131967 BOLLIG & SONS 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 385742 5232 OAKLAWN 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 385741 6028 OAKLAWN 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 5,000.00 398440 10/29/2015 123414 BOOM, CHET 29.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385354 101915 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 29.99 398441 10/29/2015 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Page - 8 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398441 10/29/2015 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC Continued... 9.54 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003625 385488 81938876 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 772.45 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003627 385489 81940208 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 781.99 398442 10/29/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 780.00 385527 129635 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 607.50 385580 129649 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,387.50 398443 10/29/2016 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 125.00 ASSESSORS MEETING 385415 9549 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 125.00 398444 10/29/2015 102220 BROWDER STONE COMPANY 375.20 JR FIRE HATS 00003663 385487 25110 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 375.20 398445 10/29/2015 137473 BUSCH, THOMAS 25.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385490 152562 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 398446 10/29/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 19.50 385434 00011050 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,121.85 385433 00011051 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 568.34 385581 721263 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,709.69 398447 10/29/2015 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. 570.41 385320 3120012 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 100.00 385321 3120302 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 670.41 398448 10/29/2015 101816 CENTRAIRE INC. 4,688.25 HVAC 385725 4 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 4,688.25 398449 10/29/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 62.48 952 944-6522 385322 6522-10/15 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 62.48 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO4 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015-- 10/29/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 9 Business Unit 398450 10/29/2015 137472 CHUN, SHUNEUI Continued... 48.76 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385417 5820 VERNON 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LANE 48.76 398451 10/29/2015 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 197.38 385582 0198155311 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 197.38 398452 10/29/2015 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 819.99 NOV 2015 MAINTENANCE 385418 110115 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 819.99 398453 10/29/2015 120433 COMCAST 25.98 8772 10 614 0496856 385663 496856-10/15 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 93.34 8772 10 614 0540232 385323 540232-10/15 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 119.32 398454 10/29/2015 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 118.01 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009440 385419 1NV000102875 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 118.01 398455 10/29/2015 120032 CORPORATE MECHANICAL 1,402.15 NC REPAIRS 385491 187317 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,402.15 398456 10/29/2016 137474 CRANDELL, BRIAN 4,900.00 OFFICER TRAINING 385492 EFD2015-01 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,900.00 398457 10/29/2015 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 413.60 LESSON CERTIFICATES 385664 00075503 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 413.60 398458 10/29/2015 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 1,540.00 REPORTS, PROGRAMMING 00001895 385665 10558 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,540.00 398459 10/29/2015 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL 10,952.25 MEMBRANE ROOFING 385481 055127 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 10,952.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015— 10/29/2015 Page - 10 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398459 10/29/2015 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL Continued... 398460 10/29/2015 137481 DATAQOM 1,896.86 POINT OF SALE SOFTWARE 385666 SO METRO SAFETY 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,896.86 398461 10/29/2015 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,701.80 NOV 2015 PREMIUMS 385667 F018342-11/15 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,701.80 398462 10/29/2015 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 23.67 TESTER 00005784 385356 43642 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.47 SOCKET SETS 00005784 385446 44425 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.14 398463 10/29/2015 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 275.00 EMMY COST 385743 102315 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 275.00 398464 10/29/2015 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 440.00 POLOS - CITIZENS ACADEMY 385668 11450 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 440.00 398465 10/29/2015 100726 DIESEL COMPONENTS INC. 33.67 RINGS 00005693 385324 10253 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.67 398466 10/29/2015 121103 DIRECTV 65.23 385669 26918153266 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 65.23 398467 10/29/2015 132377 DIVISION 9 TILE INC. 9,386.00 TILING 385726 1 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 9,386.00 398468 10/29/2015 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONSTRUCT LLC 3,088.31 CONCRETE 385727 5 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 3,088.31 398469 10/29/2015 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 257.00 TRADEMARK REGISTRATION 385325 3231853 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015- Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398469 10/29/2015 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Continued... 257,00 398470 10/29/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 327.50 STREET SMARTS AD 385670 268001 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 327.50 398471 10/29/2015 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 152.50 CONDUIT 00001826 385326 12406600 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 152.50 398472 10/29/2015 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 612.50 OFFICER HOURS FOR MOCA 385744 9/11/15 EVENT 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 612.50 398473 10/29/2015 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 262.50 GRANDVIEW TIF REPORT 385420 68736 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 262.50 398474 10/29/2015 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 839.95 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003525 386493 1774253 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 186.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003524 385494 1774637 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,026.05 398475 10/29/2015 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 245.00 OFFICER HOURS FOR MOCA 385745 9/11/15 EVENT 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 245.00 398476 10/29/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 43.42 BEAMS WITH SPOILERS 385358 1-4812012 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.50 WIPER BLADES 385357 1-4815824 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.04 BATTERIES 385360 1-Z05725 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.03 REGULATOR 385359 69-196194 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.44- CREDIT 385495 69-197529 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.88- CREDIT 385496 69-197688 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 271.67 398477 10/29/2015 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 378.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 385746 102115 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 378.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Page - 12 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398478 10/29/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS Continued... 298.73 REPAIR BANDS 00001894 385447 0168698 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 631.10 RESIDENTIAL METER 00001851 385671 0168729 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 929.83 398479 10/29/2015 119211 FIRSTLAB 212.85 DRUG TESTING 385672 FL00131251 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 212.85 398480 10/29/2015 131188 FIRST-SHRED 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 364103 137428 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 385673 162550 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.80 385674 163877 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 65.40 398481 10/29/2015 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 221.32 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 385497 MN GIS/LIS 1263.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENVIRONMENT 221.32 398482 10/29/2015 135953 FRONTIER FIRE PROTECTION INC. 2,608.70 FIRE PROTECTION 385728 4 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 2,608.70 398483 10/29/2015 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 258.55 SHOP BROOMS 00001862 385448 S101994296 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 258.55 398484 10/29/2015 103185 GERTENS 18.98 MULCH 00001941 385449 373509/1 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 18.98 398485 10/29/2015 101103 GRAINGER 65.38 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00005782 385327 9862595205 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 289.92 T-STATS 00001845 385675 9862873826 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 289.92 T-STATS 00001845 385675 9862873826 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 61.28 BROOM, DUSTPAN, BRUSH 00005782 385328 9862873834 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.64 FUSES 00001857 385676 9864486908 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 5.50 BATTERIES 00005722 385329 9865299706 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.88 SAFETY GLASSES 00005722 385329 9865299706 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 6.04 STAPLE REMOVER, TAPE DISPENS 001873 385450 9866754477 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 771.56 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015— Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398485 398486 10/29/2015 10/29/2015 101103 GRAINGER 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Continued... 393.00 385530 188250 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 375.00 385583 188255 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 768.00 398487 10/29/2015 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 766.37 LED COBRA HEADS 00001693 385330 981407160 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 308.98 ELECTRIC PARTS FOR LEWIS PK 00001872 385451 981549852 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,075.35 398488 10/29/2015 131517 GREAT LAKES WEATHER SERVICE LLC 1,310.00 WINTER WEATHER SERVICE 00001940 385331 101507 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,310.00 398489 10/29/2015 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 360.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 385747 102115 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 360.00 398490 10/29/2015 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 396.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 385748 102115 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 396.00 398491 10/29/2015 137486 GUSTAFSON DECORATING SERVICE INC. 9,305.25 PAINTING 385729 001 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 9,305.25 398492 10/29/2015 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 25.34 COOLER PARTS 385677 149145-1 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 487.53 TIMER RELAYS, FUSES 00001863 385452 149190-1 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 512.87 398493 10/29/2015 137475 HARRIS, MICHELLE 11.64 PARTY REFUND 385678 PAID TWICE 5700.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 160.00 PARTY REFUND 385678 PAID TWICE 5701.4557 BIRTHDAY RENTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 171.64 398494 10/29/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,174.96 CHEMICALS 00005285 385679 3788001 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,174.96 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015-- Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398494 398495 10/29/2015 10/29/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD Continued... 620.37 REPLACEMENT CAPS 00001891 385681 E600644 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 12,139.21 WATER MAIN MATERIAL 00001893 385683 E633463 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 552.80 REPAIR CLAMPS 00001892 385682 E634799 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 3,549.88 FIRE HYDRANT 00001890 385680 E638957 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 9,570.30- RETURN 385684 E640572 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 7,291.96 398496 10/29/2015 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 600.00 APPARATUS OPERATOR TRAINING 385498 00341781 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 600.00 398497 10/29/2015 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 150.00 LOANER CHAIRS 385685 574947 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 150.00 398498 10/29/2015 102483 HILTI INC. 15.75 ADHESIVE 00001896 385686 4606614758 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 15.75 398499 10/29/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,367.63 385531 790515 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,680.00 385532 790570 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,047.63 398500 10/29/2015 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 740.16 CHLORINE, ACID, REAGENTS 385499 151005007 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 740.16 398501 10/29/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 234.75 385533 33843 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 149.00 385584 33868 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 383.75 398502 10/29/2015 119808 INTEGRA 27.74 385690 13375004 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 27.74 398503 10/29/2015 100828 JERRY'S FOODS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015-- 10/29/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 15 Business Unit 398503 10/29/2015 100828 JERRY'S FOODS Continued... 9.48 385501 093015 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 63.32 385501 093015 1556.6106 MEETING EXPENSE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 72.80 398504 10/29/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,449.08 385534 2431211 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 54.29 385535 2431212 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,198.39 385588 2431213 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,059.20 385587 2431217 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 77.85 385585 2431218 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 453.60 385586 2431220 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 12,292.41 398505 10/29/2015 103215 JOHN E. REID & ASSOCIATES INC. 11,830.00 COURSE FEES 385687 162141 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 11,830.00 398506 10/29/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 36.48 385441 5277553 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 214.29 385373 5281782 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 271.32 385437 5282840 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 207.88 385374 5282875 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 815.00 385607 5286664 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.16 385611 5286665 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 199.32 385594 5286666 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 868.36 385591 5286667 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 264.62 385593 5286668 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 518.56 385592 5286669 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .38 385604 5286670 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.54 385608 5286671 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 763.76 385590 5286672 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,056.65 385589 5286673 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,368.56 385599 5286674 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 72.28 385598 5286675 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 35.41 385606 5286677 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,696.48 385597 5286678 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,605.04 385603 5286679 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,081.59 385605 5286680 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,705.61 385602 5286681 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,312.79 385596 5286682 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 16 Business Unit 398506 10/29/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,325.83 385601 5286683 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,690.88 385595 5286684 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,984.83 385600 5286685 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 66.82 385537 5286689 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,930.97 385610 5286690 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 318.68 385538 5286691 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,107.39 385612 5286692 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 689.66 385536 5286693 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,206.80 385609 5286694 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,840.29 385613 5286695 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 86.58- 385540 544980 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 81.16- 385539 544981 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 53.76- 385442 546180 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.00- 385439 546406 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.10- 385438 546407 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.56- 385440 546408 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.10- 385541 546413 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 39,979.97 398507 10/29/2015 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 71.00 THERMOSTAT 00001933 385454 1019610 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 58.90 WATER PANELS 00001936 385688 1019753 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 129.90 398508 10/29/2015 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 92.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385689 102015 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 92.97 398509 10/29/2015 130789 KATZ, DAVID 88.00 HOMETOWN HERO STORY 385423 613 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 88.00 LIVING STREETS CHAMPION 385423 613 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 176.00 398510 10/29/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 36.99 UNIFORMS 00003664 385503 287555-03 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 87.98 00003642 385504 288057-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 44.59 00003674 385506 288590-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.98 00003673 385505 288784-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 7.19 00003675 385507 288817-01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 260.73 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015-- Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398510 398511 10/29/2015 10/29/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE Continued... 45.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 385749 102115 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 45.00 398512 10/29/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 479.37 DRILL BITS, SCREWS, WASHERS 00005720 385332 9303614575 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 479.37 398513 10/29/2015 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 108,366.25 MUNICIPALITY-QUARTERLY 385752 51208 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,000.00 PAID CLAIM 385750 C0036315 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 683.01 PAID CLAIM 385751 LMC CA 8072 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 110,049.26 398514 10/29/2015 131846 LEGACY SERVICES CORPORATION 20,632.20 LEAD CLEANING 385564 M150376DCT1 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 20,632.20 398515 10/29/2015 112619 LES JONES ROOFING INC. 1,407.11 REFUND FOR CANCELED PERMITS 385424 CITY PARKS 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 1,407.11 398516 10/29/2015 132752 LINCO FAB INC. 15,646.50 STRUCTURAL STEEL 385382 3 SPORTS DOME 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 15,646.50 398517 10/29/2015 100558 LIND ELECTRONIC DESIGN CO INC. 229.80 TOUGHPAD SUPPLIES 00004368 385691 307196 4614.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asset Mgmt Software and Equip 114.90 TOUGHPAD SUPPLIES 00004368 385691 307196 4615.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm 344.70 398518 10/29/2015 137484 LITTLE IGLOO HTG & AC INC. 604.50 PERMIT ED141181 REFUND 385753 4202 SUNNYSIDE 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS RD 604.50 398519 10/29/2015 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 1,670.00 MILLING BITS 385692 11088 1380.6518 BLACKTOP PARKING LOTS 1,670.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015— Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398519 398520 10/29/2015 10/29/2015 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 114593 MAAP Continued... 25.00 WNTER BUSINESS MEETING 385508 102115 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 25.00 398521 10/29/2015 135856 MARS CARPET SALES 9,476.25 CARPETING 385730 1 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 7,847.48 FLOORING 385384 2 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 17,323.73 398522 10/29/2015 133904 MEDIAWORKS 1,500.00 CUB FOODS AD 385509 83681 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,500.00 398523 10/29/2015 101987 MENARDS 25.76 STORAGE DRAWERS 00002283 385510 80786 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 25.76 398524 10/29/2015 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 228.00 OFFICIATING FEES 385511 4809 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 228.00 398525 10/29/2015 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 113.58 BUCKLE 00005821 385361 495670 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.58 398526 10/29/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER 29.99 COUNCIL CHAMBERS UPGRADE 385425 5794701 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 29.99 398527 10/29/2015 104029 MIKE LARSON PLUMBING INC. 20.00 PERMIT ED142616 REFUND 385754 540 ARTHUR ST 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 20.00 398528 10/29/2015 137470 MILLER, BONNIE 121.00 CLASS REFUND 385426 11863 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 121.00 398529 10/29/2015 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 400.00 HAND SOAP 00001394 385693 SOI-041277 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015— Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398529 10/29/2016 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES Continued... 400.00 398530 10/29/2015 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 21.38 WINDOW CLEANING 385336 928044842 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 16.09 WINDOW CLEANING 385335 928044843 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 37.47 398531 10/29/2015 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 24.92 CASTERS 00005770 385694 15408 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.92 CASTERS 00005774 385695 15414 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.84 398532 10/29/2015 137469 MINNESOTA COUNTIES 100.00 CONFERENCE-RYAN BROWNING 385427 129 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 100.00 398533 10/29/2015 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 22.00 GHIN 385696 45-0150-16-10/1 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 5 22.00 398534 10/29/2015 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,048.00 TACK OIL 385697 73224 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 1,048.00 398535 10/29/2015 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 26.85 HOSE, ELBOW 00005766 385461 0111975-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 217.06 FLOJET MOTOR 00001859 385462 0111976-IN 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 243.91 398536 10/29/2015 102776 MRPA 1,134.00 SOFTBALL TEAM REGISTRATIONS 385512 8721 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 1,134.00 398537 10/29/2015 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 2,472.85 MN GOLFER MAGAZINE AD 385698 2015-41327 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,472.85 398538 10/29/2015 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 14,414.35 ELECTRICAL 385732 5 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount 10/29/2015— Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398538 10/29/2015 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY Continued... 14,414.35 398539 10/29/2015 133207 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. 400.73 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385337 KATHRYN WEIS 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 400.73 398540 10/29/2015 136839 NATIONAL STEEL FABRICATORS INC. 744.80 METAL FAB 385731 2 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 744.80 398541 10/29/2015 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 299.00 ART CENTER ADVERTISING 385428 865427 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 299.00 398542 10/29/2015 134457 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC. 22,365.14 EARTHWORK 385385 11 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 22,365.14 398543 10/29/2015 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 103.95 REPAIR CAPS FOR LIGHTING 00001874 385699 91847 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 45.00 SHORTING CAPS 00001926 385463 91895 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 148.95 398544 10/29/2015 126728 NORTH COUNTRY CONCRETE INC. 101,506.24 SITE CONCRETE 385386 1414800003 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 101,506.24 398545 10/29/2015 137476 NORTHFIELD LINES INC./BENJAMIN BUS INC. 4,337.85 VEHICLE RENTAL-VIGILANT GUARD00003606 385565 74114 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,337.85 398546 10/29/2015 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 70.00 HEADPHONES 385339 IN61910 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 398547 10/29/2015 123956 OAKS PROPERTIES LLC 154.53 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385362 5128 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CIR 154.53 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 21 Business Unit 398548 10/29/2015 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS Continued... 2,073.50 WELL HOUSE #9 PROJECT 385340 #3 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,073.50 398549 10/29/2015 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 103.98 DRY-ERASE BOARDS 385758 791817756001 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 67.69 385761 794822301001 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 12.91- 385760 796553664001 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 54.78- 385759 796553665001 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 168.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 385700 799001733001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 272.09 398550 10/29/2015 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 27.03 385701 W15090682 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 27.03 385701 W15090682 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 54.06 385701 W15090682 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 81.09 385701 W15090682 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 81.12 385701 W15090682 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 189.21 385701 W15090682 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 297.33 385701 W15090682 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 54.06 385701 W15090682 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 27.03 385701 W15090682 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 108.12 385701 W15090682 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 121.63 385701 W15090682 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 121.64 385701 W15090682 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 54.06 385701 W15090682 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 81.09 385701 W15090682 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 81.09 385701 W15090682 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 54.06 385701 W15090682 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 284.94 SEPT 2015 385702 W15090687 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 76.38 LANGUAGE LINE 385703 W15090772 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,820.97 398551 10/29/2015 101659 ORKIN 144.35 PEST CONTROL 385455 105483868 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 144.35 398552 10/29/2015 130917 OWL ENGINEERING & EMC TEST LABS INC. 750.00 CELL INTERFERENCE STUDY 385341 3506 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 750.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 22 Business Unit 398553 10/29/2015 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC Continued... 89.49 SIGN HOLDERS 00006469 385704 358133 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 89.49 398554 10/29/2015 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 37,193.54- PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 385762 BA-410,S-115 07115.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S115 VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK 26,750.48 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 385762 BA-410,S-115 07105.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S105 TH100 SIDEWALK 108,208.34 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 385762 BA-410,S-115 01410.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 52,537.10 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 385762 BA-410,S-115 05540.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 175,820.48 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 385762 BA-410,S-115 03482.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 84,206.54 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 385762 BA-410,S-115 04318.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS-318 NINE MILE CREEK DREDGE 27,772.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 385763 WM-556 05556.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Morningside Water Main Lining 438,102.08 398555 10/29/2015 118899 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 149,647.54 ASPHALT PAVING 385387 03 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 149,647.54 398556 10/29/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,323.33 385443 8520232-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,179.00 385614 8520239-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 2,502.33 398557 10/29/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS .38 385617 2870960 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 38.41 385626 2870961 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 334.77 385624 2870962 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 595.86 385625 2870963 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 119.19 385621 2870964 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.48 385543 2870965 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,530.56 385618 2870967 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.16 385619 2870968 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,640.18 385620 2870969 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,772.30 385622 2870970 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 3,127.19 385616 2870973 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,704.00 385542 2870974 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 422.12 385615 2870975 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 219.48 385544 2870976 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 141.72 385623 2871154 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 11,706.80 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015— 10/29/2015 Page - 23 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398558 10/29/2015 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC. Continued... 700.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 385513 416040349 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 398569 10/29/2015 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 950.00 DATA PLAN 385705 IN200-1006407 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 950.00 398560 10/29/2015 137052 QUALITY DRYWALL MIDWEST 1,387.00 GYPSUM BOARD 385733 2 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 1,387.00 398561 10/29/2015 120221 RACHEL CONTRACTING INC. 1,040.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 385518 102015 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 17,366.00 EARTHWORK 385734 14045.10 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 18,406.00 398662 10/29/2015 105707 RAINBOW INC. 30,020.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 385388 5,6 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 30,020.00 398563 10/29/2015 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 99.97 PINTLE HOOK & BALL 00005764 385344 1927693943 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.91 WIRING ADAPTERS 00005768 385364 1927695188 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.97 JACK 00005769 385365 1927695189 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.94 PINTLE HOOK AND MOUNT 00005785 385363 1927695190 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.97- CREDIT 385366 1927695223 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.94 JACKS 00005773 385464 1927695524 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 206.76 398564 10/29/2015 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 12,246.16 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 385735 4520013706 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 12,246.16 398565 10/29/2015 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO INC 471.91 NOZZLE PARTS 385707 IA02174 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 500.00 NOZZLE PARTS 385707 IA02174 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 971.91 398566 10/29/2015 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 2,234.00 OAK WILT INSPECTION 00001921 385708 909444654 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015— Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398566 10/29/2015 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS Continued... 2,234.00 398567 10/29/2015 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 29.84 0402 37306935 0 385764 000987 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 29.84 398568 10/29/2015 128151 SCHERER BROS LUMBER CO. 996.34 ROUGH CARPENTRY 385736 3 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 996.34 398569 10/29/2015 105514 SCHIRO, DOUG 28.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385709 102115 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.97 398570 10/29/2015 100995 SEH 1,649.36 BRAEMAR 18 WETLANDS 385367 304634 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 537.02 INDUSTRIAL PARK - PHASE 1 385710 304780 08060.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 11,336.69 WM LINING 385710 304780 05556.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Morningside Water Main Lining 13,523.07 398571 10/29/2015 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 514.90 CANOPIES 385519 102115 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 514.90 398572 10/29/2015 120784 SIGN PRO 823.41 SIGNS 385711 9645 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 410.82 ADOPT-A-PARK SIGNS 00001856 385465 9682 1643.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL TURF CARE 1,234.23 398573 10/29/2015 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 74.48 ROUNDUP 00001953 385712 73772027 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 74.48 398574 10/29/2015 133014 SOCCER SHOTS 10,593.00 FALL SOCCER SEASON 385566 102215 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 10,593.00 398575 10/29/2015 129587 SOLBERG, DAVID 78.25 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385713 102115 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 78.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 10/29/2015- Inv No 10/29/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398575 398576 10/29/2015 10/29/2015 129587 SOLBERG, DAVID 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTERY Continued... 240.47 CARPET CLEANING 385714 1293C 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 240.47 CARPET CLEANING 385715 1294C 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 480.94 398577 10/29/2015 137053 SOUTHERN MINNESOTA WOODCRAFT INC. 190.00 FINISHED CARPENTRY 385737 TWO 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 190.00 398578 10/29/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 9.75- 385376 0019867 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 139.00 385552 1336433 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 389.20 385375 1337699 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 962.40 385632 1338806 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 601.60 385631 1338807 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 659.15 385630 1338808 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 264.24 385551 1338809 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,358.00 385547 1338811 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 898.40 385549 1338812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,752.31 385550 1338813 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 27.80 385548 1338814 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING .80 385546 1338815 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,693.22 385627 1338816 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,327.24 385545 1338817 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 80.80 385628 1338818 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,368.00 385629 1338819 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,879.45 385553 5012738 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 670.00- 385554 9061899 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 530.00- 385633 9066567 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22,191.86 398579 10/29/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 205.75 385634 6701 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 205.75 398580 10/29/2015 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 595.82 TIRES 00005819 385346 10135493 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 595.82 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015— 10/29/2015 Page - 26 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398581 10/29/2015 130963 TCF NATIONAL BANK Continued... 135.00 OVERPAYMENT-FALSE ALARM FEES 363071 REIMBURSE 1400.4332 FALSE ALARMS - POLICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 135.00 398582 10/29/2015 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 345.58 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 385521 102015 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 345.58 398583 10/29/2015 137485 TEKTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 17,716.29 FINISH CARPENTRY 385738 001 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 11,095.62 FINISH CARPENTRY 385739 002 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 28,811.91 398584 10/29/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1,615.87 385555 926351 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,615.87 398585 10/29/2015 137483 TITLE ONE INC. 70.86 REFUND ASSESSMENT OVERPAYMENT 385717 5708 HAWKES 19130.1232 SP ASSESS RE DEFERRED BA-407 COUNTRYSIDE F TERR 70.86 398586 10/29/2015 128347 TKO WINES INC. 600.00 385556 2330 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 600.00 398587 10/29/2015 135912 TLUSTOSCH, RYAN 387.14 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 365447 021915 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 387.14 398588 10/29/2015 120595 T-MOBILE 33.87 477067848 385716 092715 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 33.87 398589 10/29/2015 119374 TNC INDUSTRIES INC. 468.00 PLYMOVENT REPAIR 385522 33562 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 468.00 398590 10/29/2015 102212 UPBEAT INC 703.63 TRASH RECEPTACLE 00001708 385718 570097 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 650.00 RECYCLE CAN 00001708 385719 570163 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Page - 27 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398590 10/2912015 102212 UPBEAT INC Continued.- 3,350.67 PICNIC TABLES 00001712 385720 570409 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 4,704.30 398591 10/29/2015 101064 VESSCO INC. 766.00 TRANSDUCER 00001656 385721 64655 5914.6530 REPAIR PARTS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 766.00 398592 10/29/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 492.21 CONNECTORS 385477 9763278 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 328.14 CONNECTORS 385475 9763281 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 579.40 FUSE HOLDERS 00001843 385348 9773884 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 532.84 CONNECTORS 385479 9774888 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 193.76 TAPS FOR LOAD BANK 00005176 385470 9774891 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 484.40 TAPS FOR LOAD BANK 00005176 385472 9780581 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 48.44 TAPS FOR LOAD BANK 00005176 385471 9780586 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 65.80 WIRE, UTILITY KNIFE 00001922 385473 9800153 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 496.29 TUSS - FRANCE LED 00001922 385474 9800189 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 532.84- RETURN 385480 CM598023 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 328.14- RETURN 385476 CM598027 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 492.21- RETURN 385478 CM598028 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,868.09 398593 10/29/2015 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 41.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385722 102115 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.99 398594 10/29/2015 134219 WALSH, SHELBIE 217.54 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 385523 MN GIS/LIS 1263.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENVIRONMENT 217.54 398595 10/29/2015 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC. 921.88 385723 6317 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 921.88 398596 10/29/2015 137134 WEIERS, STEVE 80.55 TRAINING EXPENSES 385370 PHASE 2 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 157.55 TRAINING EXPENSES 385370 PHASE 2 1281.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRAINING 238.10 398597 10/29/2015 101312 WINEIVIERCHANTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015- 10/29/2015 Page - 28 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398597 10/29/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 2,392.72 385637 7052268 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,155.70 385640 7052270 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 62.73 385641 7052271 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,404.44 385642 7052272 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 241.16 385638 7052485 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 410.32 385639 7052487 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,667.07 398598 10/29/2015 137471 WIRKKALA, PATRICIA A. 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385432 143439 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 398599 10/29/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,368.94 385563 1080387720 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,270.00 385643 1080387721 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,620.50 385558 1080387722 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,751.70 385562 1080387785 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 74.62 385561 1080387786 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 45.15 385559 1080387787 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,393.61 385560 1080387788 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92.00- 385644 2080108868 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,432.52 398600 10/29/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 3,950.30 385380 1090480083 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,987.55 385379 1090480084 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 23.80 385378 1090480085 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,779.85 385444 1090480867 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 72.40 385445 1090480868 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,548.62 385646 1090482537 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,838.00 385645 1090482539 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 12,200.52 398601 10/29/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,841.90 5 1-62276 19-3 385351 475153012 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 51.38 51-5276505-8 385524 475319497 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 114.81 5 1-00 10025256-3 385349 475387432 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 14.61 5 1-00 106131 06-9 385350 475400298 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 11,469.30 51-0837548-4 385765 476279797 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 14,492.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:34 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 10/29/2015— 10/29/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398601 10/29/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued-. 398602 10/29/2015 101091 ZIEGLER INC 1,327.40 MACHINE REPAIRS 385352 SW140147522 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,327.40 3,050,016.52 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,382,675.50 A/P ACH Payment 1667,341.02 Total Payments 3,050,016.52 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 226,091.68 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 33,443.54- 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,208,025.39 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 4,184.36 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 29.99 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,526.94 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 61,55 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 127.03 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 8,112.12 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 36,077.35 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 321,830.46 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 5,779.44 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,963.54 05800 LIQUOR FUND 158,093.28 05900 UTILITY FUND 575,890.24 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 497,250.36 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 34,452.03 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 262.50 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,701.80 Report Totals 3,050,016.52 CITY OF EDINA 10/27/201510:44:44 Council Check Summary Page - 1 10/29/2015 - 10/29/2015 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date /0 /2-9 /1 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 - Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2199 11/5/2015 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 2,278.50 WORKOUT ROOM FLOORING 385881 022025753 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 149.00 PD WORKOUT EQUIPMENT 385915 022025784 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 27,893.86 PD WORKOUT EQUIPMENT 385916 022025785 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 30,321.36 2200 11/5/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 72.00 386161 1946258 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.60 386118 1946262 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 52.00 386119 1946263 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 201.60 2201 11/5/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 162.63 COFFEE 385770 9284886 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 162.63 2202 11/5/2015 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 1,249.00 PROMENADE - PHASE 4 386028 23271309.02-8 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,249.00 2203 11/5/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 70.30 385830 50663100 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 90.10 385831 50663300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,151.30 386122 50766100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 487.75 386123 50766200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 957.75 386163 50766400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,020.90 385971 50766500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 303.83 385833 92901600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 211.19 385832 92901800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 182.73 386124 92935700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,475.85 2204 11/5/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 21.00 PENS 386030 0E-408096-1 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 14.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 385949 0E-408332-1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 77.68 LABELS, PENS, PENCILS 386031 0E-408376-1 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 44.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003012 385773 WO-152890-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 385948 WO-153533-1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 161.62 2205 11/5/2015 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 — 11/5/2015 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Page - 2 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2205 11/5/2015 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. Continued... 7,350.00 SANITARY SEWER REHAB 386033 0183434 03493.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Presidents Neighborhood 7,350.00 2206 11/5/2015 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 4,894.94 MATERIALS TESTING 386035 5042207 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 4,920.50 MATERIALS TESTING 386034 B042208 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA-377 VALLEY VIEW RD 9,815.44 2207 11/5/2015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 40.83 IPAD ACCESSORY 00004371 385885 XZ90761 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 44.14 SURFACE PRO CASE 00004371 385885 XZ90761 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.73 SURFACE PRO CASE 385886 ZL43322 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.71 SURFACE PRO CASE 00004380 385887 ZS69131 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 182.41 2208 11/5/2015 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 811.23 386126 221020 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 811.23 2209 11/5/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,109.95 385837 825252 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 295.25 385928 826316 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,567.60 385976 826317 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 70.70 385977 826318 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,718.07 385929 826319 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,761.57 2210 11/5/2015 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 41,416.50 SEPT 2015 LODGING TAX 385794 SEPT2015 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 41,416.50 2211 11/5/2015 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 315.00 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 386201 49278 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 315.00 2212 11/5/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 63.10 DRAIN REPAIR PARTS 00001867 385799 950927 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 63.10 2213 11/5/2015 100858 LOGIS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 - 11/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2213 11/5/2015 100858 LOGIS Continued... 1,601.25 IT CONSULTING 385900 40855 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 656.25 WIFI @ CLP 385900 40855 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY VVIFI PROJECT 236.25 COUNCIL PROJECT 385900 40855 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 2,493.75 2214 11/5/2015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 2,048.32 385841 205361 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,048.32 2215 11/5/2015 103944 MED COMPASS 78.75 HEARING TESTS 385960 28087 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 695.63 HEARING TESTS 385960 28087 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 65.62 HEARING TESTS 385960 28087 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 52.50 HEARING TESTS 385960 28087 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 157.50 HEARING TESTS 385960 28087 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 1,050.00 2216 11/5/2015 101483 MENARDS 49.39 PD WORKOUT ROOM PARTS 00001945 385901 98397 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 97.98 LUMBER, HINGES 00001960 385804 98411 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 15.20 LUMBER FOR FENCE REPAIR 00001960 385803 98414 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 81.82 LUMBER 00001963 385805 98508 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 46.45- RETURN 385806 98520 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 31.67 SPRAY TIP, SHOP TOWELS 00001967 385807 98542 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 229.93 SPOTLIGHTS, DIGITAL BOX LEVEL 386049 98840 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 459.54 2217 11/5/2015 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 468.10 STATION SUPPLIES 00003685 386080 36908 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 468.10 2218 11/5/2015 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 900.00 INSTALL ICE VENT 386052 2182 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 715.00 INSTALL ICE VENT 386051 2183 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC 1,615.00 2219 11/5/2015 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 42,336.65 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 386053 BA-377 ENG 15-1 07133.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S133 Valley View Rd 188,747.69 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 386053 BA-377 ENG 15-1 01377.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA-377 VALLEY VIEW RD 1,339.56 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 386053 BA-377 ENG 15-1 05557.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Valley View Rd R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 - Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2219 11/5/2015 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. Continued... 23,190.46 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 386053 BA-377 ENG 15-1 04415.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Valley View Rd 255,614.36 2220 11/5/2015 130141 OENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 260.25 386177 4049 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 260.25 2221 11/5/2015 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 314.20 TOILET REPAIRS 386215 66890 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 314.20 2222 11/5/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 58.50 BUSINESS CARDS 385963 88198 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 58.50 2223 11/5/2015 104672 SPRINT 16.59 385917 873184124-155 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 33.18 385917 873184124-155 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.11 385917 873184124-155 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 49.09 385917 873184124-155 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 99.54 385917 873184124-155 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 119.97 385917 873184124-155 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 199.18 385917 873184124-155 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 239.14 385917 873184124-155 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 16.59 385917 873184124-155 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 270.13 385917 873184124-155 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.59 385917 873184124-155 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,104.11 2224 11/5/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 167.62 PLUMBING PARTS 00001738 385968 S3145573.002 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 336.49 SHOWER PARTS 00002282 386112 S3157008.001 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 68.56 DRAIN PARTS 00001885 386061 83160044.001 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 78.15 DRAIN PARTS 00001885 386062 S3160044.002 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 650.82 2225 11/5/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 78.63 386016 0135900-IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 132.00 386015 0135901-IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 319.00 386156 0136521-IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 - 11/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2225 11/5/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA Continued... 90.50 386157 0136522-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 90.50 386184 0136526-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 710.63 2226 11/5/2015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 10.17- CREDIT 385823 43397205 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 538.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 385822 43803921 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 273.07 CONCESSION PRODUCT 386224 43869851 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 801.05 2227 11/5/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 725.20 385846 407295-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 811.55 386185 407928-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 608.25 386018 407929-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,138.15 386017 408088-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VV1NE VERNON SELLING 3,283.15 398603 11/5/2015 124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST 2,836.62 JANITORIAL SERVICE 385766 8670711 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,836.62 398604 11/5/2015 137506 ABOOD, JOSEPH 546.85 CHILI OPEN F&B - TIN FISH 386068 REIMBURSE 5401.4591 GREEN FEES EIGHTEEN HOLES GOLF REVENUES 546.85 398605 11/5/2015 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 73.23 HEATER PARTS 00001942 385767 428363 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 73.23 398606 11/5/2015 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 121,804.00 COUNCIL CHAMBERS UPGRADE 00004051 385768 SYSINV101915DB 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 121,804.00 398607 11/5/2015 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 125.00 COFFEE 386087 116337 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 125.00 398608 11/5/2015 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 135.00 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 385769 72990 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 135.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Page - 6 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 -- 11/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398608 398609 11/5/2015 11/5/2015 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued.. 2,262.00 385827 3062330 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,740.00 385828 3062411 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,044.00 385924 3062412 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 71.25 386121 3063440 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 445.00 386162 3063441 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,535.50 386120 3063442 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,097.75 398610 11/5/2015 123479 BAKER, ZACHERY 442.98 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 385882 102715 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 442.98 398611 11/5/2015 134025 BAUER BUILT TIRE 1,065.44 TIRES 386029 180176026 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,065.44 398612 11/5/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 283.00 385829 4039 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 570.00 385925 4084 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 853.00 398613 11/5/2015 126996 BCA - CJTE 240.00 TRAINING -ANTHONY MARTIN 385947 17072-092315SMM 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 TRAINING- NATE MENDEL 385946 26538-092315SMM 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 TRAINING - LYNN OLSON 385883 29828-092315SMM 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 720.00 398614 11/5/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 360.00 PIZZA 385771 D2813765 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 360.00 398615 11/5/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 171.60 385772 254449 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 118.50 385834 255292 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 20.00 385972 256014 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 - Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398615 11/5/2015 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 233.20 385973 256016 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 543.30 398616 11/5/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 193.80 COFFEE 386192 T128824 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 369.50 COFFEE 386193 T147440 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 563.30 398617 11/5/2015 103832 BLACK & DECKER U.S. INC. 78.07 LED LIGHT 00001958 386032 02071059 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 78.07 398618 11/5/2015 136871 BLACKLIST BEER LLC 430.00 386125 1151026808 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 430.00 398619 11/5/2015 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 183.51 PD WORKOUT ROOM 00001823 385774 910109841 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 48.07 00001823 385775 910149618 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 11.24 00001823 385776 910170785 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 242.82 398620 11/5/2015 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 7.39 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003628 386194 81952160 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 448.45 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003628 386195 81953593 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 455.84 398621 11/5/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 326.00 385835 129634 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 486.00 385974 129805 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 812.00 398622 11/5/2015 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 374.00 SOCCER REGISTRATION 385950 9549- SOCCER 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 374.00 398623 11/5/2015 100676 CAMPBELL, RALPH 210,00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 386235 6700 POINT DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 210.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 - 11/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398624 11/5/2015 129186 CANVAS CRAFT INC. Continued... 815.00 LOAD BANK COVER 385777 31803 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 815.00 398625 11/5/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 39.00 385836 00011044 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 54.40 385926 00011054 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,422.25 385927 728215 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,515.65 398626 11/5/2015 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 216.66 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385884 102715 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 216.66 398627 11/5/2015 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 34.87 10089900-4 385783 10089900-10/15 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 90.11 10437426-9 385779 10437426-10/15 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 791.63 5546504-1 385781 5546504-10/15 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 118.94 5563827-4 385780 5563827-10/15 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 418.63 5584304-9 386226 5584304-10/15 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 18.75 5584310-6 386227 5584310-10/15 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 40.41 5590919-6 386228 5590919-10/15 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 2,004.56 5591458-4 385782 5591458-10/15 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 22.39 5596524-8 386069 5596524-10/15 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 266.86 8034001-1 386196 8034001-10/15 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 28.64 9546705-6 386036 9546705-10/15 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 726.75 9724639-1 385778 9724639-10/15 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,562.54 398628 11/5/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 126.07 952 831-0024 386070 0024-10/15 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 54.48 952 920-1565 386071 1565-10/15 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 58.77 952 920-1586 386073 1586-10/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 75.44 952 922-2444 386072 2444-10/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 133.95 952 920-9996 386197 9996-10/15 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 448.71 398629 11/5/2015 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 266.66 ABOUT TOWN AD 385951 COM-0660 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 266.67 ABOUT TOWN AD 385951 COM-0660 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 266.67 ABOUT TOWN AD 385951 COM-0660 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 -- Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398629 11/5/2015 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS Continued... 800.00 398630 11/5/2015 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 328.20 385975 0198155911 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 328.20 398631 11/5/2015 137068 COLEBECK, LOYOLA 54.00 MODEL 385888 102315 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00 MODEL 386198 103015 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 114.00 398632 11/5/2015 120433 COMCAST 131.05 386074 1774499/15 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 6.76 8772 10 614 0373022 385784 373022-10/15 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 142.75 8772 10 614 0540372 386199 540372-10/15 5552.6188 TELEPHONE SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 280.56 398633 11/5/2015 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 352.00 CONCRETE MIX 00001968 386037 0135055-IN 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 352.00 398634 11/5/2015 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 1,129.92 CLAY, CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009438 385785 1NV000102593 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 45.75 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009438 385787 1NV000103253 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 27.00 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009375 385789 1NV000103474 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 18.82 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009442 385786 R200403819 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 210.11 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 00009445 385788 R200404042 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,431.60 398635 11/5/2015 137504 COWLES, MARGUERITE 308.66 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 386038 6644 PARKWOOD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 308.66 398636 11/5/2015 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,545.83 386088 42309 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,545.83 398637 11/5/2015 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 68.00 SEPT 2015 WASHES 385790 435868 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 68.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398637 398638 11/5/2015 11/5/2015 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 103833 CROW-HASSAN NURSERY L.L.C. Continued-. 3,225.00 TREES FOR PAMELA PARK 00001952 385791 3149 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 3,225.00 398639 11/5/2015 102596 CROWN TROPHY 170.40 PLATE ENGRAVING 385792 11283 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 170.40 398640 11/5/2015 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 760.00 ANNUAL SERVICE 386075 108579 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 760.00 398641 11/5/2015 137490 DESIGNER SPACES INC. 2,600.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 385889 5613 GATE PARK 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS RD 2,202.98 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 385890 5613 GATE PARK 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS RD 4,702.98 398642 11/5/2015 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 5,800.59 REFUSE 386230 DT0001257787 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,421.20 REFUSE 386229 DT0001257788 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 7,221.79 398643 11/5/2015 102454 DRISTE, BRIAN 274.91 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386039 102815 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 274.91 398644 11/5/2015 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 840.00 OPEN STREETS EVENT 386231 110215 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 840.00 398645 11/5/2015 105906 EGAN COMPANY 61,642.77 FINAL PAYMENT NO. 4 386040 L-61-FINAL 08061.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS FRANCE AVE LIGHTING&CONDUIT 61,642.77 398646 11/5/2015 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 411.45 PUMP REPAIR PARTS 00001884 386090 0056490-IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 872.00 REPLACEMENT IMPELLER 00001950 386089 0056500-IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 - 11/5/2015 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Page - 11 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398646 11/5/2015 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. Continued... 2,164.00 PUMP REPAIR PARTS 00001884 386091 0056514-IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 3,447.45 398647 11/5/2015 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 3,180.11 DWI CAR BUILDUP 385891 RS4286 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 385.00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 385793 RS4287 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,565.11 398648 11/5/2015 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 147.60 386164 4707 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 147.60 398649 11/5/2015 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 420.00 OPEN STREETS EVENT 386232 110215 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 420.00 398650 11/5/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 670.14 BATTERIES 385795 1-4820006 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 379.33- CREDIT 385796 69-197699 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.82 FILTERS 385952 69-199185 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.53 BELT, KIT, SPARK PLUGS 386041 69-199395 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.16 TRANSFER CASE FLUID 386042 69-199413 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 444.32 398651 11/5/2015 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 13.04 FASTENERS 00005700 385797 MNTC2133288 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.04 398652 11/5/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 4,887.22 HYDRANT REPAIR PARTS 00001902 386092 0165603 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 236.81 HYDRANT REPAIR PARTS 00001904 386094 0170714 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 731.76 METER, MOUNTING KIT 00001903 386093 0171083 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 5,855.79 398653 11/5/2015 135932 FLYNN, LAUREN 60.00 MODEL 386200 103015 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00 398654 11/5/2015 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 24.60 SKATE SHARPENING 386202 89867 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398654 11/5/2015 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION Continued... 24.60 398655 11/5/2015 125935 GOLF SCORECARDS INC. 527.34 SCORECARDS 386203 40868 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 527.34 398656 11/5/2015 101103 GRAINGER 939.84 FILTERS 00001949 386095 9871598521 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 265.16 KNEE PADS, GLOVES 00001944 386043 9871828811 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,205.00 398657 11/5/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 282.75 385838 188251 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 110.25 385978 188517 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 393.00 398658 11/5/2015 132968 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES INC. 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 386117 5241 MIN,NEHAHA 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 386115 5300 OAKLAWN 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 386116 5300 OAKLAWN 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 7,500.00 398659 11/5/2015 121256 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING 144.95 BALLOONS 386234 45477 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 144.95 398660 11/5/2015 135335 GREENSCAPE COMPANIES INC. 1,750.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 386096 CITY PROJECT 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1,750.00 398661 11/5/2015 100918 GRIMSBY, NANCY 78.72 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385953 5932 WOODDALE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 78.72 398662 11/5/2015 137495 GRUMAN, BARBARA 100.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385892 102715 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398663 11/5/2015 130116 HARRIS CONTRACTING COMPANY Continued... 8,982.00 CENTRALIZED AIR 00001620 385798 82358 450005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTRALIZED HVAC CONTROLS 8,982.00 398664 11/512015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,148.85 CHEMICALS 00005285 386097 3791119 5915.6566 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,148.85 398665 11/5/2015 126917 HAYES, SUSAN 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 385893 102315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 398666 11/5/2015 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 7,099.76 FIRE HYDRANTS 00001907 386098 E639996 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 291.78 HYDRANT REPLACEMENT ITEMS 00001905 386099 E664475 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 223.59 GV RISER PARTS 00001906 386100 E688716 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 7,615.13 398667 11/5/2015 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 349.61 BUFFER PADS, CLEANERS 00002285 386102 601822990 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 87.65 VACUUM PARTS 00002287 386101 700206717 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 437.26 398668 11/5/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 833.00 385839 790366 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 210.00 385930 791488 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,518.50 386165 791603 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,124.50 385979 791631 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,130.92 385980 792026 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 134.00 386166 792406 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,950.92 398669 11/5/2015 105461 HOLL, SHELLEY 200.00 AWARD 385894 102315 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 200.00 398670 11/5/2015 137494 HOLLAND, MICHAEL E. 149.54 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385895 102715 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 149.54 398671 11/5/2015 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 - 11/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398671 11/5/2015 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS Continued... 358.23 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 385954 102815 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 358.23 398672 11/5/2015 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 395.26 386204 608401938 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 395.26 398673 11/5/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 429.00 385840 33897 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 318.00 385981 34038 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 747.00 398674 11/5/2015 131805 IRSA VIDEO 4,400.00 SQUAD VIDEO SYSTEM 00003007 385896 1235 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 4,400.00 398675 11/5/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 86.59 386205 10/15-FIRE 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 33.58 385955 10/15-LIQUOR 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 3.59 385956 10/15-POLICE 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 123.76 398676 11/5/2015 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 140.00 WATER SHUT OFF NOTICES 386044 69317 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 140.00 398677 11/5/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,055.65 385982 2431250 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 9,184.22 386127 2431257 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 135.15 386128 2431258 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 177.80 386129 2431259 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13,552.82 398678 11/5/2015 137507 JL THEIS 1,340.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 386103 MNDOT HVVY 100 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1,340.00 398679 11/5/2015 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA INC. 51.92 AIR COMPRESSOR PARTS 00001833 385957 10208061-00 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 51.92 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Page - 15 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 - 11/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398679 11/5/2015 398680 11/5/2015 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA INC. 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 223.35 386172 5287024 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,335.47 386173 5291943 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 363.48 386174 5291944 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 62.82 386191 5291945 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 386141 5291946 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.16 386145 5291947 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 496.67 386138 5291948 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 965.80 386167 5291949 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 386131 5291950 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.80 385988 5291952 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,897.76 386168 5291953 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 206.37 386139 5291955 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 273.48 386169 5291957 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,026.44 386170 5291958 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,720.48 386171 5291959 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 99.40 386140 5291960 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,934.53 386130 5291962 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,294.98 386133 5291963 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,108.56 386142 5291964 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 180.60 386144 5291965 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,006.64 386146 5291966 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,312.49 386134 5291967 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,973.71 386143 5291968 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,214.75 386136 5291969 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,692.24 386132 5291970 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,089.10 386135 5291971 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 780.20 385985 5291975 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,256.30 385987 5291976 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 656.95 385983 5291977 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,416.41 385991 5291978 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,744.30 385984 5291979 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,012.77 385990 5291980 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 414.89 385986 5291981 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 25.16 385989 5291982 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 13.63- 385992 546403 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.50- 385993 546409 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 102.25- 385994 547931 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 39.45- 385995 547932 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — 11/5/2015 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398680 11/5/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 19.44- 385996 547933 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22.80- 385997 548233 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.92- 386175 548925 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 52,582.39 398681 11/5/2015 100357 JOHNSON, DAN 39.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385897 102715 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 39.99 398682 11/5/2015 137500 JOURNAL COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1,415.00 ACCT COE829 - MN DEED 385958 082419 9232.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,415.00 398683 11/5/2015 101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK 81.03 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386045 102815 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 81.03 398684 11/5/2015 137508 KALI CONCRETE LLC 30,486.00 REPLACE CONCRETE SIDEWALKS 00002290 386104 EP103015 5700.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 30,486.00 398685 11/5/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 452.97 00003674 386077 288590-02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 648.89 00003678 386078 289764 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 221.37 UNIFORMS 00003672 386076 289792 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,323.23 398686 11/5/2015 137492 KENAS, WAYNE 145.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385898 6617 WARREN AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 145.00 398687 11/5/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 727.43 RAMP STAIR RESTORATION 385800 7138540 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 727.43 398688 11/5/2015 124707 KNAEBLE, PETER 124.99 UNIFORM BOOTS 386079 102815 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 124.99 398689 11/5/2015 137079 KNOBELSDORFF ELECTRIC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 -- 11/5/2015 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398689 11/5/2015 137079 KNOBELSDORFF ELECTRIC Continued... 2,465.00 SOLAR MODULE REPLACEMENT 385801 117549 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 2,465.00 398690 11/5/2015 130165 KNUDSEN, DAVID 100.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385899 102215 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 100.00 398691 11/5/2015 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 726.50 LOGO CLOTHING 386046 SIN3202933 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 726.50 LOGO CLOTHING 386046 SIN3202933 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 726.52 LOGO CLOTHING 386046 SIN3202933 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 2,179.52 ... 398692 11/5/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 719.65 NUTS, BOLTS, BITS 00005772 385802 9303635586 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 719.65 398693 11/5/2015 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 600.00 PAID LOSS 386206 CA 000000008883 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 600.00 398694 11/5/2015 136616 LEGKY, TONY 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 386236 320 ADAMS 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 398695 11/5/2015 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 225.98 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 386238 110115 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,615.49 UFED LICENSE PROGRAM 386237 110215 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,841.47 398696 11/5/2015 137502 LORIG, LOREN & BARBARA 444.05 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385959 5613 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET INTERLACHEN CIR 444.05 398697 11/5/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 214.58 AIR COMPRESSOR 00005827 386048 2155619 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 251.69 PUMP, COVER 00005832 386047 2155666 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 466.27 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 -- 11/5/2015 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398698 11/5/2015 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Continued... 11,122.86 UNLEADED FUEL 00005786 386105 897460 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11,122.86 398699 11/5/2015 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 320.00 HOSTING FEE 386207 212 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 320.00 398700 11/5/2015 101987 MENARDS 33.99 EXT CORDS, SHOWER WAND, TUBS)0002289 386106 81471 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 33.99 398701 11/5/2015 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 385808 4817 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 228.00 OFFICIATING FEES 386208 4825 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 370.50 398702 11/5/2015 137509 METRO WATER CONDITIONING INC. 1,895.55 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 00002286 386107 16727 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,895.55 398703 11/5/2015 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 41.30 GASKET, SCREEN ASSEMBLY 00005860 386050 495829 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.30 398704 11/5/2015 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 8.64 CAPACITORS 00005721 385809 1451332-00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.64 398705 11/5/2015 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 32.00 EXAM FEE 386239 NATHAN KADERLIK 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 32.00 398706 11/5/2015 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 90.00 LICENSE FOR OFFICER 385902 JEPSON 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS . POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 398707 11/5/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 491.00 BOARDS/COMMISSION BROCHURES 386240 18686 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 54.00 MUSIC IN EDINA POSTERS 385810 18845 2611.6575 PRINTING MUSIC IN EDINA 190.41 IQS TRAINING SUPPLIES 385811 18903 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date 11/5/2015 — Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398707 11/5/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 398708 11/5/2015 735.41 101385 MITY-LITE INC 4,378.17 BANQUET TABLES 386081 00005994 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 4,378.17 398709 11/5/2015 102776 MRPA 100.00 JOB POSTING 385961 8729 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 100.00 398710 11/5/2015 136099 NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTER INC. 350.00 EDINA RESIDENT SURVEY 385962 5583 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 350.00 398711 11/5/2015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 89.50 385998 104436 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 113.50 386176 104437 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 203.00 398712 11/5/2015 104350 NIKE USA INC. 301.20 GOLF BALLS 386209 977388365 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 600.00 GOLF BALLS 386210 977388366 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 901.20 398713 11/5/2015 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 139.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 386211 797642705001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 116.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 386212 800302029001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 256.35 398714 11/5/2015 104158 OPUS DESIGN BUILD CO 1,440.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 386108 5108 EDINA IND 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES BLVD 1,440.00 398715 11/5/2015 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 4,250.00 CONNECT CITY WATER 00002685 386054 3592 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 4,250.00 398716 11/5/2015 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 4,250.00 CONNECT TO CITY WATER 00002688 386055 3593 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398716 398717 11/5/2015 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. Continued... 11/5/2015 4,250.00 1,200.00 HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 386109 CITY PROJECT 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 1,200.00 398718 11/5/2015 137491 PARTY UNIT 350.00 DJ FOR GLOW DODGEBALL 385903 776087 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 350.00 398719 11/5/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,051.89 385842 8520234-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 969.14 385931 8521240-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 366.87 386178 8521241-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 918.73 385999 8521242-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 174.25 385932 8521243-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 739.75 386147 8521362-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,220.63 398720 11/5/2015 102963 PELUF, JIM 218.92 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385904 102315 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 218.92 398721 11/5/2015 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 376.70 385933 48955569 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 409.68 386213 50593581 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 99.00 386110 50593629 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 281.24- 386214 50593660 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 365.80 385843 50722791 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 969.94 398722 11/5/2015 117087 PETERSON COMPANIES 2,683.22 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 386056 STS-401 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 34,661.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 386056 STS-401 01251.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS A-251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE 8,028.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 386056 STS-401 04401.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PROMENADE H2O FEATURE&PATH 16,156.79 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 386056 STS-401 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 61,530.49 398723 11/5/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS .19- 386005 222961 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 - 11/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398723 11/5/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 553.66 386180 2874526 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 185.80 386179 2874528 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 311.18 386154 2874529 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \MNE YORK SELLING 1.74 386152 2874530 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.74 386000 2874531 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,469.52 386150 2874533 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,604.41 386148 2874534 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 970.88 386153 2874535 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 739.60 386151 2874536 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,514.51 386003 2874540 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 114.32 386004 2874541 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 152.22 386001 2874542 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,697.64 386002 2874543 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,317.03 398724 11/5/2015 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 386111 332935 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,223.86 398725 11/5/2015 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 69.21 GLOVES 00005723 385812 57319 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.21 398726 11/5/2015 123961 PRIMUS, JANNINE 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 385965 102315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 398727 11/5/2015 108540 PROFESSIONAL TURF & RENOVATION 2,580.00 FERTILIZER 386057 495360 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 2,580.00 398728 11/5/2015 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 280.00 DASHER BOARD SALES 385813 1015151-8 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 1,810.50 DASHER BOARD SALES 385814 1015151-8 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 2,090.50 398729 11/5/2015 117073 RINEHART, THOMAS 135.72 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386058 102815 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 135.72 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398730 11/5/2015 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH Continued... 287.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385906 102615 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 287.00 398731 11/5/2015 137493 ROBISON, MICHELLE A. 1,364.89 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385907 102715 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,364.89 398732 11/5/2015 135215 ROCKIN HOLLY1NOODS, THE 750.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 385908 102315 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA 750.00 398733 11/5/2015 124780 RONNING, LAUREN 56.82 REIMBURSE FOR LIGHT BULBS 386216 103015 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 56.82 398734 11/5/2015 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 173.79 BRAKE CLEANER 385964 68290353 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.79 398735 11/5/2015 122530 SATO AMERICA LLC 55.34 EVIDENCE LABELS 385965 30436308 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.34 398736 11/5/2015 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 68.56 FURNACE FILTERS 00001920 386217 133415 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 68.56 398737 11/5/2015 137489 SCATIENO, LORRAINE 105.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 385909 4224 70TH ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 105.00 398738 11/5/2015 137499 SCHROEDER, DIANE 5.00 REFUND 385966 26938 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 5.00 398739 11/5/2015 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 285.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 386233 110215 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 285.00 398740 11/5/2015 100995 SEH R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398740 11/5/2015 100995 SEH Continued... 61,232.57 WM ASSESSMENT 386059 304752 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES-WATER 61,232.57 398741 11/5/2015 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 1,130.00 SEPT/OCT ADMIN FEES 386218 008816-10/15 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 1,130.00 398742 11/5/2015 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 RAMP TRASH ROOM CLEANING 385815 53037 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,650.00 398743 11/5/2015 137069 SHATZ-AKIN, PIPER 180.00 MODEL 386219 103015 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.00 398744 11/5/2015 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 4,069.59 AVOLVE TRAVEL EXPENSES 00004387 385910 B04132735 4612.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FD Plan Review Software 4,069.59 398745 11/5/2015 120784 SIGN PRO 202.00 PARKING SIGNS 385816 9677 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 202.00 398746 11/5/2015 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 79.85 TIME CARDS 386220 13074372 5511.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 79.85 398747 11/5/2015 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 53.45 HOT DOG BUNS 385817 273882 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 53.45 398748 11/5/2015 132195 SMALL LOT MN 358.11 386006 4467 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 358.11 398749 11/5/2015 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 51.95 SOCKETS 00005783 385818 ARV/27103722 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 51.95 398750 11/5/2015 105739 SNAZA, DAVID R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 - Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398750 11/5/2015 105739 SNAZA, DAVID Continued... 124.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386060 102815 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 124.95 398751 11/5/2015 136580 SOCIABLE CIDER WERKS LLC 1,000.00 386007 1969 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,000.00 398752 11/5/2015 129587 SOLBERG, DAVID 82.18 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385911 102715 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 82.18 398753 11/5/2015 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 2,085.00 FIREARMS CERTIFICATES 385967 9211 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,085.00 398754 11/5/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,284.90 385844 1338820 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,298.80 386182 1341179 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 88.80 386181 1341180 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 425.60 386009 1341181 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,656.39 386010 1341182 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,957.97 386008 1341184 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 533.47 385934 1341185 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,868.94 386012 1341186 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 771.66 385936 1341187 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 107.80 385935 1341188 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 567.00 386011 1341789 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 948.23 386183 1342558 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 175.00- 385845 9066566 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16,334.56 398755 11/5/2015 105152 SPAIN, MARK - PW 119.25 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385912 102715 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.25 398756 11/5/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 411.50 386155 6729 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 411.50 398757 11/5/2015 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — 11/5/2015 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398757 11/5/2015 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA Continued... 262.67 CONCESSION PRODUCT 386113 510270071 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 262.67 398758 11/5/2015 101025 TAMARACK MATERIALS INC. 287.34 CEILING TILES 386114 7120971-00 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 287.34 398759 11/5/2015 137505 TEAM CONSULTING LLC 100.00 REVIEW WORKSHOP MATERIALS 386063 AAS CASE STUDY 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 100.00 398760 11/5/2015 113549 TENNIS WEST 29,139.00 REHABILITATE BASKETBALL COUR100001530 386064 15-007707 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 29,139.00 398761 11/5/2015 121253 THAYER, LARRY 17.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 385969 102315 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 17.25 398762 11/5/2015 121517 THIEDE, JOHN 24.99 SAFETY GLASSES 385913 102615 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 116.40 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385913 102615 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 174.99 SAFETY BOOTS 385913 102615 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 316.38 398763 11/5/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 64.10 386014 927728 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,773.17 386013 927729 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 81.80 386221 927920 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,919,07 398764 11/5/2015 121708 TIMBERLAND OUTDOOR SERVICES INC. 4,990.00 CUL DE SAC PROJECT 386222 11160 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4,990,00 398765 11/5/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 159.64 WELDING GAS 00005771 385819 10105253 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 159.64 398766 11/5/2015 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398766 11/5/2015 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. Continued-. 397.00 A/C REPAIRS 385820 16975 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 397.00 398767 11/5/2015 137496 TOTTEN, JOE 86.60 UNIFORM PURCHASE 385914 102715 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 86.60 398768 11/5/2015 136104 TRYSTAR INC. 6,201.34 CABLES FOR LOAD BANK 00005176 385821 117808 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 6,201.34 398769 11/5/2015 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC 1,829.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 386065 T48712115 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 1,829.00 398770 11/5/2015 103048 U.S. BANK 842.25 HSAACCT MAINT FEE 386082 9562912 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 842.25 398771 11/5/2015 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 17.54 SHIPPING CHARGES 00005718 386066 TRAN:4242 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17.54 398772 11/5/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 56.72 CAN LINERS 385970 365631-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 603.29 LIQUOR BAGS 385970 365631-00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 660.01 398773 11/5/2015 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 2,830.00 NOV 2015 CLEANING 386223 41515 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 2,830.00 398774 11/5/2015 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 132.33 BRATS 385824 88527 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 132.33 398775 11/5/2015 132450 WATER TOWER CLEAN & COAT INC. 7,762.00 VV TOVVER CLEANING 00001897 385825 VVT77827 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 7,762.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/5/2015 -- 11/5/2015 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Page - 27 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398776 11/5/2015 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID Continued-. 125.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386067 102815 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 125.96 398777 1115/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 169.16 385847 7052484 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 632.32 386020 7052486 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 621.14 386186 7053246 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 337.16 386160 7053247 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 284.64 386159 7053249 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41.82 386158 7053250 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,557.44 386019 7053253 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,643.68 398778 11/5/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,049.20 385848 1080387723 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 178.15 386021 1080390745 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,870.35 386022 1080390747 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 73.15 386024 1080390750 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,416.85 386023 1080390751 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 178.15 386188 1080390752 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 556.08 386187 1080390753 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,684.25 386189 1080390794 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 178.15 385941 1080390795 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 49.03 385939 1080390796 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 884.30 386025 1080390797 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,813.80 386026 1080390798 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,867.37 385940 1080390799 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,237.97 385938 1080390800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.15 385937 1080390801 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 34.00- 385849 2080108859 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 96.00- 385850 2080111441 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 120.00- 385851 2080111517 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 19,859.95 398779 11/5/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 1,121.30 385852 1090482538 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,792.00 386027 1090483175 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,496.15 385942 1090483737 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 47.60 385944 1090483738 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 560.00 385943 1090483739 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 - Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398779 11/5/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued... 5,152.85 386190 1090485788 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13,169.90 398780 11/5/2015 • 101726 XCEL ENERGY 29.56 51-4151897-6 385876 476176414 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.50 51-7567037-0 385877 476214232 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.58 5 1-00 10619811-5 385873 476255548 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 32.29 5 1-0223 133-2 385871 476270918 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 17.40 51-0160483-1 385872 476270925 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,336.51 51-4159265-8 386241 476326407 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 52.46 51-4420190-3 385875 476330034 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 119.58 51-6541084-2 385874 476363243 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5.29 51-5938955-6 385923 476380529 5937.6185 LIGHT & POWER INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 96.79 51-9770164-7 385862 476402760 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 24.90 51-9770163-6 385863 476405612 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 88.23 5 1-00 10166207-2 385869 476407304 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 27.63 51-0010118404-0 385870 476409695 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 17.46 51-0010573502-3 385866 476417344 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 17.59 51-0010573385-0 385867 476420341 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 62.92 51-0010619455-3 385865 476423171 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.49 51-0010777228-2 385864 476429634 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 18.73 5 1-00 10573384-9 385868 476437472 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 27.74 5 1-01 93479-4 385855 476443284 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 1,158.25 51-5107681-4 385922 476506421 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,412.84 51-5547446-1 385921 476516034 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 8,094.56 51-6644819-9 385918 476530267 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,381.28 51-9011854-4 385853 476555011 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 45.30 51-8976004-9 385878 476555610 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 206.89 51-8987646-8 385879 476556079 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 196.12 51-9608462-5 385854 476564683 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 7,085.90 51-9603061-0 385919 476564687 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,358.82 51-0010060454-7 385920 476568088 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 29.45 5 1-001 0504853-2 385858 476579371 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.24 5 1-001 0619788-5 385859 476582588 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.24 5 1-00 106 19810-4 385860 476583692 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 76.91 5 1-00 10838463-7 385861 476592709 5936.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC 40.23 51-0010103585-7 385856 476731461 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5.06 51-0010876027-9 385857 476752681 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 90.73 51-6692497-0 385880 476758464 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 30,687.29 51-4621797-2 386086 476836397 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/5/2015 — Inv No 11/5/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398780 11/5/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 790.83 51-4827232-6 386085 476837754 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 8,209.09 51-6955679-8 386083 476876249 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 34.90 51-8102668-0 386084 476891912 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 63,976.58 398781 11/5/2015 101091 ZIEGLER INC 107.47 FILTERS 00005725 385826 PC001713916 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.47 398782 11/5/2015 101531 ZINN, BOBO 113.35 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 386225 103015 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 113.35 1,149,195.62 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 774,976.53 374,219.09 1,149,195.62 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 11/3/2015 10:28:50 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 11/5/2015 - 11/5/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 191,237.30 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 38,327.63 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 45,019.87 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 1,004.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 309,192.76 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 122,040.25 04500 CANDO FUND 8,982.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,412.92 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,517.99 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 790.83 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 6,350.79 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 9,879.25 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 232.86 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 50,870.05 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 100.00 05800 LIQUOR FUND 181,105.87 05900 UTILITY FUND 124,020.86 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 33,296.08 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,993.52 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 18,820.79 Report Totals 1,149,195.62 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date " 75-7( CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 07/26/15-08/24/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2015/08/06 $33.06 Food GREEN MILL DULUTH DULUTH MN 1170.6104 **6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2015/08/07 $350.74 Lodging INN LAKE SUPERIOR DULUTH MN 1170.6104 **6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2015/08/07 $350.74 Lodging INN LAKE SUPERIOR DULUTH MN 1170.6104 **6043 LISA SCHAEFER 2015/08/09 $350.74 Lodging INN LAKE SUPERIOR DULUTH MN 1170.6104 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/07/28 $42.40 Food SALUT BAR AMERICAIN EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/08/04 $76.97 Food GOOD EARTH I EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/08/06 $49.64 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/08/12 $1,320.00 Annual Conference ICMA ONLINE PURCHASES 800-745-8780 DC 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/08/14 $43.83 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2015/08/19 $130.89 Food THE TIN FISH EDINA MN 1120.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/07/27 $48.00 Volunteer Software VOLGISTICS INC 616-456-5388 MI 1120.6105 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/08/01 $11.75 Ribbon JO-ANN ETC #2026 EDINA MN 1556.6406 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/08/04 $89.00 Conference LBP*REALESTATECOMMGRP 312-416-1860 IL 1120.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/08/18 $120.50 Certificate Folders BAUDVILLE INC. 800-728-0888 MI 1550.6406 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/08/18 $165.20 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2015/08/20 $760.00 Registration URBAN LAND INSTITUTE 800-321-5011 DC 1120.6105 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2015/08/05 $330.00 Conference PAYPAL *MNAPA 402-935-7733 CA 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2015/08/12 $4.99 Cookies for Farwell JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1140.6106 "7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/08/03 $18.25 Transaction fee PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 1160.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/08/03 $19.95 Transaction fee-UB PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 5902.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/08/03 $19.95 Transaction fee PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 1160.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/08/17 $35.00 Test for New Online Registration EDINA STORE 952-833-9520 MN 1160.6406 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2015/08/18 ($35.00) Test for New Online Registration EDINA STORE EDINA MN 1160.6406 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/08/21 $310.00 MAAO Fall Conference MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES 763-569-3357 MN 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2015/08/20 $125.00 MAAO Fall Conference CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOLF RE BRAINERD MN 1190.6104 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/07/29 $5.31 Postage-Mailing USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1263.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/07/29 $88.25 Food SARPINOS PIZZERIA SLP 952-2244888 MN 1260.6406 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/08/15 $160.00 Registration U OF M ARBORETUM OL 612-301-1271 MN 1263.6104 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/08/14 $245.00 Registration U OF M CCE NONCREDIT 612-625-4259 MN 1263.6104 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2015/08/17 $280.00 Conference PAYPAL *MNAPA 402-935-7733 CA 1262.6104 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2015/07/28 $730.52 Schooling MNSCU 877-4666728 MN 1281.6104 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/08/04 $260.00 TCS Certification Application Fee ATSSA 540-3681701 VA 1281.6104 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/08/05 $1,245.62 Gas Detector ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY IN 610-917-0991 PA 5912.6530 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/08/04 $108.94 Shop Supplies SEARS ROEBUCK 1142 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5913.6556 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/08/07 $203.06 Shop Supplies USA BLUE BOOK 800-493-9876 IL 5913.6406 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/08/07 $316.36 Shop Supplies USA BLUE BOOK 800-493-9876 IL 5921.6406 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/08/07 $418.02 Shop Supplies USA BLUE BOOK 800-493-9876 IL 5923.6406 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/08/12 $621.01 Shop Supplies HILT! INC 800-879-8000 OK 5921.6530 **7756 GARY WELLS 2015/08/12 $431.57 Shop Supplies HILTI INC 800-879-8000 OK 5921.6530 "6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2015/07/27 $39.99 Hose NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT BURNSVILLE MN 5913.6406 "6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2015/08/07 $130.00 TCS Certification Application Fee ATSSA 540-3681701 VA 1281.6104 "6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2015/08/19 $94.03 Employee Lunch-Reimbursed DQ GRILL&CHILL #41184 EDINA MN 1552.6406 "6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2015/08/20 $51.47 Propane SUPERAMERICA 4047 EDINA MN 1335.6406 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/07/29 $485.00 Conference [AFC] 916-939-5000 CA 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/08/12 $133.47 Product BROWNELLS INC 641-6235401 IA 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/08/13 $395.00 Training MINNESOTA SHERIFFS ASSN 651-4517216 MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/08/13 $395.00 Training MINNESOTA SHERIFFS ASSN 651-4517216 MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/08/18 $30.00 Seminar PAYPAL *USPCA 12 402-935-7733 CA 1400.6104 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 07/26/15-08/24/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/08/18 $127.94 Tactical Gear TACTICALGEARCOM 636-6808000 MO 2340.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/08/20 $30.00 Seminar PAYPAL *USPCA 12 402-935-7733 CA 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2015/08/24 $46.95 Drug ID Bible AMERA-CHEM INC 800-772-2539 CO 2340.6104 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/08/12 $136.65 Food JIMMY JOHN'S #517 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1400.6406 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2015/08/18 $116.40 Tools TM ART 845-704-2266 NJ 2340.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/07/29 $60.77 Food-Wagner Retirement JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/07/30 $61.99 Food-Lutz Retirement JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/08/11 $40.71 2015 Criminal Elements Book & CD MINNESOTACO 651-641-1600 MN 1400.6405 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2015/08/14 $278.53 2015 Criminal Elements Books MINNESOTACO 651-641-1600 MN 1400.6406 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/08/10 $10.72 Radar APP APL* ITUNES.COM/BILL 866-712-7753 CA 1470.6406 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/08/19 $135.00 ICC Dues-Jeff Siems INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC 888-422-7233 IL 1470.6105 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/08/22 $8.57 Frame TARGET 00002204 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1470.6406 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2015/08/24 $644.08 Vigilant Guard Meals PAN ERA BREAD # 608024 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1470.6106 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2015/08/07 $80.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2015/08/11 $257.33 Work Light THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1470.6406 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2015/08/10 $68.04 Switch SSCOR, INC. 818-5044054 CA 1470.6406 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2015/08/20 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2015/08/22 $109.99 Uniform Boots CHAMPS SPORTS 800-8262205 WI 1470.6558 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2015/08/24 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/07/28 $613.94 Vigilant Guard Supplies HOMEDEPOT.COM 800-430-3376 GA 1470.6106 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/07/29 $464.89 Vigilant Guard Supplies HOMEDEPOT.COM 800-430-3376 GA 1470.6106 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/07/27 $650.56 Vigilant Guard Supplies E-RIGGING.COM 888-6828186 LA 1470.6106 **2717 CRAIG ESSIG 2015/07/30 $87.80 Vigilant Guard Supplies HOMEDEPOT.COM 800-430-3376 GA 1470.6106 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2015/08/12 $57.00 Inspection Supplies IN *BAILEY'S TEST STRIPS 201-3438004 NJ 1490.6406 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/07/30 $22.75 Travel Ins for Flight TRAVEL INSURANCE POLICY 800-729-6021 VA 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/07/31 $600.00 Conference & Code Hearings INT'L CODE COUNCIL 888-422-7233 IL 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/07/31 $880.00 Training Code Staff EB SHORE VIEW-2012 IEC 888-810-2063 CA 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/07/31 $880.00 Training Code Staff EB EAGAN-2012 IECC FU 888-810-2063 CA 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/07/30 $310.20 Airfare DELTA AIR 0062316691597 DELTA.COM CA 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/08/04 $100.00 Training-Energy Code EB EXTERIOR ENVELOPE 888-810-2063 CA 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/08/05 ($220.00) Fundamentals Refund EVENTBRITE 8888102063 CA 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/08/20 $561.43 Bags for Permit Packs ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY 414-769-1000 WI 1495.6406 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/08/20 $129.00 Mailing List MINNESOTAS BOOKSTORE 651-2973000 MN 1495.6136 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/08/21 $85.00 Registration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND I 651-2845722 MN 1495.6104 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/08/21 $446.46 OSA Fee for Copying CANON SOLUTIONS AMERIC 773-714-8500 IL 1495.6406 **2512 DAVID FISHER 2015/08/24 $236.68 Copier CSA Charge CANON SOLUTIONS AMERIC 773-714-8500 IL 1495.6406 **4619 TIM BARNES 2015/07/30 $406.83 Ice Maker SEARS ROEBUCK 8162 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1551.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/07/27 $7.54 Parts MINNEAPOLIS LOCK & KEY MINNEAPOLIS MN 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/08/04 $41.45 Color Key Tags DODSON COMPANY 616-575-0254 MI 1553.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/08/04 $80.00 Parts PAYPAL *HUBCAPS.COM 402-935-7733 CA 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/08/05 $91.26 Parts MSC 800-645-7270 NY 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/08/05 $3.21 Holster Accessory-iPhone OTTERBOX/LIFEPROOF 970-493-8446 CO 1553.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/08/05 $205.77 PIG Chat Mat Yellow Absorbent Roll NPC*NEW PIG CORP 800-468-4647 PA 1553.6610 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/08/05 $22.63 Parts MINNEAPOLIS LOCK & KEY MINNEAPOLIS MN 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/08/17 $14.49 Otterbox Defender for HTC PAYPAL EBAY MARKTPLC USD 402-935-7733 NE 1553.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2015/08/18 $35.64 Bakery JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1553.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/07/31 $26.99 Memory for Josh AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6710 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/04 $139.45 Imaging Software CBI*ACRONIS 800-799-9570 IL 1554.6160 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 07/26/15-08/24/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/05 $475.95 iPad for Braemar Golf Maintenance APPLE STORE #R054 EDINA MN 5410.6122 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/07 $27.96 Cables AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1400.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/11 $111.98 MacDrive 10 Pro MEDIAFOUR 515-2257409 IA 1554.6160 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/14 $23.38 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/14 $577.34 PC for Televising Truck-PW IN *SUPERLOGICS 508-6509500 MA 4615.1705 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/14 $1,134.66 PC for Televising Truck-PW IN *SUPERLOGICS 508-6509500 MA 4614.1705 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/15 $32.15 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/15 $263.98 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/16 $115.78 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/17 $15.60 IT Tools-Fish Line AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/17 $49.99 IT Tools-Fish Tape AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/17 $18.04 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/17 $193.88 IT Tools THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/20 $241.36 VM Workstation for Nick DRI*VMWARE MY.VMWARE.COM MN 1554.6160 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/19 $106.10 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/19 $38.74 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/19 $20.00 PC for Televising Truck-PW IN *SUPERLOGICS 508-6509500 MA 4614.1705 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/20 $22.98 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/20 $514.39 IT Tools-Misc AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2015/08/24 $99.00 Prime Membership AMAZONPRIME MEMBERSHIP AMZN.COM/PRME NV 1554.6406 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/07/29 $30.00 Food JAMBA JUICE 0413 EDINA MN 5310.6104 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/07/30 $15.00 Food CARIBOU COFFEE CO #130 MINNETONKA MN 5310.6104 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/08/10 ($2.50) Test EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINA EDINA MN 5710.6406 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/08/10 $2.50 Tes EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINA EDINA MN 5710.6406 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2015/08/13 $12.19 Personal-Reimbursed HOLIDAY STNSTORE 0343 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5710.6406 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2015/08/10 $600.00 NRPA Agency Dues NATIONAL RECREATION & 703-858-2179 VA 1600.6105 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2015/08/11 $40.17 Food for Board Meeting TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1600.6106 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2015/08/11 $231.93 Park Board Dinner PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1600.6106 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2015/08/19 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1600.6188 **7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/07/27 $2,259.81 Golf BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE EDINA MN 1628.4392.02 "7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/07/27 $73.00 Trip GUTHRIE THEATER BOX OFFIC 612-377-2224 MN 1628.4392.07 "7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/07/29 $560.12 Food DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1627.6406 "7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/08/17 $5.90 Portfolia TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1628.6513 **7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/08/17 $195.00 Conference MN RECREATION AND PARK A 763-571-1305 MN 1600.6104 "7279 DONNA TILSNER 2015/08/20 $22.51 Supplies OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT #64 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1628.6513 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/07/30 $185.50 Gym Rental BCS*EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCA 952-848-3952 MN 1624.6404 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/08/07 $65.78 Tennis Camp Supplies DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1623.6404 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/08/14 $1,291.76 Portable Toilet Rental JIMMYS JOHNNYS INC 651-2775912 MN 1621.6404 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2015/08/14 $3.99 Water JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1624.6404 **0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2015/07/28 $449.99 Tools NORTHERN TOOL EQUIP MINNETONKA MN 1646.6556 **0756 BOB PRESTRUD 2015/08/20 $26.82 Soccer Ball SPORTS AUTHORITY 0704 RICHFIELD MN 1643.6556 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/07/27 $399.00 Archiving Platform ARCHIVESOCIAL.COM 888-558-6032 NC 1130.6124 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/07/28 ($834.75) Drone Refund PAYPAL *B H PHOTO 4029357733 NY 1130.6410 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/07/29 ($14.95) Drone Refund PAYPAL *B H PHOTO 4029357733 NY 1130.6140 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/07/29 $54.29 Ground Commercial THE UPS STORE 1715 EDINA MN 1120.6235 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/07/31 $12.00 Stock Footage WWW.ISTOCK.COM 866-478-6251 WA 1130.6410 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/07/31 $11.96 Subscription THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCULAT 612-6734343 MN 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/03 $10.72 Photoshop Lightroom Bundle ADOBE *PHOTOGPHY PLAN 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6103 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 07/26/15-08/24/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/05 ($999.80) Drone Refund PAYPAL *B H PHOTO 4029357733 NY 1130.6410 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/05 $29.65 Notary Renewal NOTARY ROTARY, INC 515-309-1351 IA 1120.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/05 $20.00 Data Plan-Kaylin VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/05 $120.00 Notary Renewal SECRETARY OF STATE 651-2011368 MN 1120.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/05 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Scott ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/06 $20.00 Data Plan-Jordan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/06 $69.72 Seagate 1TB MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL ST LOUIS PARK MN 1130.6410 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/06 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Scott ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/10 $149.18 Subscription MAILCHIMP MAILCHIMP.COM GA 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/11 $20.00 Data Plan-Scott VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/12 $10.95 Props for Golf Course Commercial JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/12 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Kaylin ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/13 $69.98 Ballot Boxes AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 2610.6406 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/13 $32.17 Creative Cloud-Jennifer ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/16 $30.00 Data Plan-Ann Swenson VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1100.6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/15 $50.00 Edina Liquor Facebook Ad FACEBOOK CG2KT7S532 650-6187714 CA 5842.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/17 $120.00 Values VIP Awards TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1550.6121 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/18 $29.95 Online Invoicing 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS 416-481-6946 ON 1130.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/18 $18.60 Photo Contest Winner Prints TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1130.6408 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/18 $40.00 Values VIP Awards TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1550.6121 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/18 $5.00 Spam Blocker AKSMT.COM 877-273-3049 CA 1130.6124 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2015/08/17 $32.17 Creative Cloud-Jordan ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **5821 AMY SMITH 2015/08/11 $28.36 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5420.6406 **5821 AMY SMITH 2015/08/11 $13.76 Hammer and Index Cards WALGREENS #16057 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5410.6406 **5821 AMY SMITH 2015/08/21 $10.47 Bandaids JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 5410.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/07/28 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 5440.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/07/29 $14.99 Furniture Slide TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5420.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/07/29 $101.88 Lamps, Floral HOMEGOODS #0581 EDINA MN 5420.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/08/13 $27.26 Chalkboard Block JO-ANN ETC #2026 EDINA MN 5440.6406 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/08/15 $24.39 Postage-Mailing FEDEX 781157682994 MEMPHIS TN 5410.6235 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2015/08/17 $98.00 Postage-Mailing USPS 26632704333409905 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5410.6235 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/08/01 $240.88 Lodging BREEZY POINT RESORT INTL BREEZY POINT MN 5510.6104 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/08/01 $481.75 Lodging BREEZY POINT RESORT INTL BREEZY POINT MN 5510.6104 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/08/04 $6.43 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT #415 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5510.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/08/15 $150.00 Training SERVING THE AMERICAN R 719-5381149 CO 5510.6104 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/08/17 $4.82 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5511.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/08/18 $22.77 Parts 1000BULBS.COM 800-6244488 TX 5511.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/08/22 ($215.88) Lodging BREEZY POINT RESORT INTL BREEZY POINT MN 5510.6104 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2015/08/22 $56.57 Lodging BREEZY POINT RESORT INTL BREEZY POINT MN 5510.6104 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/07/30 $25.18 Garden Camp Supplies MICHAELS STORES 3739 BLOOMINGTON MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/08/12 $105.00 Gift Cards BUNNY'S BAR AND GR SAINT LOUIS P MN 1621.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/08/17 ($121.00) Test EDINA STORE EDINA MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/08/17 $121.00 Test EDINA STORE 952-833-9520 MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/08/20 ($35.00) Test PARK AND REC EDINA CITY H EDINA MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2015/08/20 $35.00 Test PARK AND REC EDINA CITY H 952-826-0430 MN 1624.6406 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/07/28 $550.00 Advertising TIGER OAK 612-548-3246 MN 5110.6122 **9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/07/31 $41.27 Building-General Supplies ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800-295-5510 IL 5111.6406 "9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/07/31 $61.92 General Supplies THE WEBSTAURANT STORE 717-392-7472 PA 5110.6406 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 07/26/15-08/24/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account "9328 MICHAEL FREY 2015/08/12 $129.47 Building-General Supplies HIRSHFIELDS/SOUTHDALE EDINA MN 5111.6406 **5802 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/07/30 $890.80 Concessions-AC Repair FLARE HEATING & AIR CONDI 763-542-1166 MN 5720.6180 **5802 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/07/31 $39.85 LG Uniforms AMERICAN LIFEGUARD PROD 800-4458721 FL 5311.6201 **5802 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/07/30 $1,847.27 Umbrella Canopy ANCHOR INDUSTRIES 812-8672421 IN 5311.6406 **5802 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2015/08/21 $100.00 Postage POSTAGE REFILL 800-468-8454 CT 5710.6235 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/07/27 $195.81 Planting BACHMAN'S INC #1 MINNEAPOLIS MN 5761.6620 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/07/28 $2,395.80 Submersible Sewage Pump WW GRAINGER 877-2022594 PA 5761.6530 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/07/30 $64.18 Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/03 $9.98 Aqua Net PETCO 608 63506083 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/03 $83.95 Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/05 $45.64 Zebco Reel AMAZON .COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/05 $182.56 Zebco Reel AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/06 $199.50 Dog Poop Bags POOPBAGSUS 866-269-1202 FL 5765.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/07 $358.00 Cedar Log Tete a Tete MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/11 $54.32 Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/12 $30.00 Fuel SUPERAMERICA 4186 RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/12 $49.42 Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/13 $97.64 Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/17 $29.00 Office Supplies WHENIWORK.COM 651-330-4482 MN 5760.6105 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/17 $91.71 Supplies THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/18 $12.99 Audio Cable AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5760.6513 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/18 $107.68 Planting BACHMAN'S INC. MINNEAPOLIS MN 5765.6620 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/18 $141.12 Planting WAGNER GREENHOUSES 612-9226901 MN 5761.6620 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/21 $459.00 Green Creative LED Bulbs WESTSIDE WHOLESALE, IN 877-9989378 KY 5761.6406 "0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2015/08/22 $301.55 Flood Lamps GRAYBAR ELECTRIC 314-573-9200 MO 5761.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/07/27 $64.35 Parking Permit CITY OF EDINA RECEPTION'S EDINA MN 5820.6260 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/07/30 $26.72 Grocery TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1100.6106 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/08/06 $20.36 Supplies 5TAPLS7140791468000001 877-8267755 MI 5820.6513 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/08/06 $20.36 Supplies STAP L57140791468000002 877-8267755 MI 5840.6513 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/08/10 $53.62 Parking Permit CITY OF EDINA RECEPTIONIS EDINA MN 5820.6260 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/08/14 $20.35 Supplies STAPLS7140791468000003 877-8267755 MI 5860.6513 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/08/20 $39.98 Batteries BATTERIES PLUS #16 BLOOMINGTON MN 5840.6406 **0093 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2015/08/21 $21.20 Sanitizer TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5840.6406 "2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/07/28 $22.09 Supplies JERRY'S DO IT BEST_ EDINA MN 7413.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/07/28 $42.80 Supplies MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7412.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/07/29 $13.37 Supplies JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 7410.6106 "2223 GREG BRETSON 2015/08/04 $354.35 Compressor JOHN HENRY FOSTER MN,INC 800-582-5162 MN 7411.6406 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/08/02 $104.01 Supplies TARGET 00023002 RICHFIELD MN 7414.6106 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/08/01 $41.94 Email service EMA*EMMA EMAIL MARKETING 800-5954401 TN 7410.6122 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/08/23 $7.90 USB Flash Drive AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 7414.6406 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/08/23 $18.21 USB Flash Drive AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 7410.6406 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/08/24 $20.57 Blacklight for Lead Testing AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 7412.6406 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2015/08/24 $10.80 USB Flash Drive AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/05 $112.50 LED and Flood MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7412.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/06 $80.36 Ballast MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/12 $13.91 Supplies WAL-MART #1855 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/12 $21.43 Orange Goop Cleaner MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/16 $16.60 Zep Glass Cleaner Refill MENARDS RICHFIELD RICHFIELD MN 7411.6406 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 07/26/15-08/24/15 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/18 $53.41 Bulbs BATTERIES PLUS #20 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 "0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/18 $26.91 Tools KEEPRS INC 2 ST PAUL MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/20 $1.00 Supplies SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY EDINA MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2015/08/24 $7.21 Supplies MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 $41,736.69 Rebate ($2,926.48) $38,810.21 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date / / Fina I oidirjr,„Inprii .AIWIAL Air ,d1 ,of- YiN'er Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve New On-Sale Wine and Beer Licenses, Z I taliano, 1705 Southdale Center Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Motion granting a new on-sale wine license and on-sale beer license to Z Italiano, LLC dba Z I taliano, 1705 Southdale Center f or the period beginning November 18, 2015 and ending March 31, 2016. INT RODUCT ION: AT TACHMENT S: Description Staff Report: Z Italiano On-sale Wine & Beer Licenses Police Investigation Summary: On-sale Wine and Beer License Z Italiano November 17, 2015 MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk Approve New On-Sale Wine and Beer Licenses, Z Italiano LLC, 1705 Southdale Center Information / Background: Z Italiano, LLC dba as Z Italiano, at 1705 Southdale Center has applied for new on-sale wine liquor and 3.2 beer licenses. This restaurant will occupy the space formerly occupied by California Pizza Kitchen at Southdale Center. They have filed the necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the license. The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant’s plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation. Attached is Lt. Dan Conboy’s memo stating the findings of the Police Department’s background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. Lt. Dan Conboy # BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSE Establishment: Z Italiano, LLC dba Z Italiano License: On-Sale Wine, 3.2% In October 2015, the Edina Police Department completed a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for an On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. The application was submitted by Z Italiano, LLC dba Z Italiano, 1705 Southdale Center, Edina. Z Italiano, LLC dba Z Italiano is authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of Minnesota. Z Italiano, LLC dba Z Italiano is in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. Z Italiano, LLC dba Z Italiano and its representatives are aware of the City of Edina's requirement relating to employee alcohol awareness training, and have completed the necessary training. Owners/Partners/Members: Z Italiano, LLC dba Z Italiano: Kim Saueressig McClusky, ND Zacharey Saueressig Chaska, MN The owners/partners/members have been investigated and were found to have no criminal records. Checks were made with the following agencies. NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division Minnesota Department of Revenue Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent Z Italiano, LLC dba Z Italiano from obtaining an On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:2016 Calendar Of Meeting Dates Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Motion approving the 2016 Council meeting dates and draft calendar of Board and Commission meeting dates. INT RODUCT ION: AT TACHMENT S: Description Draft 2016 Meeting Schedule Staff Report 2016 Meeting Calendar PRELIMINARY DRAFT 2016 CITY OF EDINA COUNCIL, ADVISORY BRDS, COMS. COMMS. MEETINGS, HOLIDAYS ELECTION DATES Holidays City Council Nite to Unite Pln Comm HP Brd Trns Com Park Brd Indicates a religious holiday's observance Caucus Night Elect Day Health Human R/R Com E& E Comm Arts & Culture Comm JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 27 28 29 30 31 31 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 30 31 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER Meeting Schedule for 2016. Dates Subject to Change November 17, 2015 Council Consideration November 17, 2015 MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL Debra Mangen, City Clerk 2016 Council Meeting Dates and Board and Commission Meeting Dates Information / Background: Edina’s regularly scheduled meetings are held on the first and third Tuesday of each month. The City Council holds a work session in the Community Room of City Hall before each meeting at 5:30 p.m. with their regularly scheduled meeting held in the Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. Each year the City Council confirms their annual schedule noting changes necessitated due to conflicts with holidays, days of religious observance or Election Day. In accordance with the City’s Policy restricting public meetings due to days of Religious Observances, the following dates will be avoided from regularly scheduled Council meetings or Board and Commission meetings: • Good Friday (Christian) – March 25, 2016 • Christmas Eve (Christian) – December 24, 2016 • Evening before and day of Yom Kippur (Jewish ) – October 11 & 12, 2016 • Evening before and two days of Rosh Hashanah (Jewish) – October 2-4, 2016 • Evening before and first two days of Passover (Jewish) – April 22-24, 2016 • Eid al Fitr (Muslim) – July 6, 2016 • Eid al Adha (Muslim) – September 11, 2016 • The third day of Diwali (Hindu) – October 31, 2016 During 2016, staff is suggesting that the following three City Council meetings be moved: • First meeting in March will move to Wednesday, March 2nd to avoid “Precinct Caucuses” • First August meeting will move to Wednesday, August 3rd to avoid “Night to Unite” • First October meeting will move to Wednesday, October 5th to avoid “Rosh Hashanah” The attached calendar shows with red hash marks all of the days of religious observance that we will avoid hosting any meeting or special event. Typical holidays have been highlighted in yellow. There is also a color coded key of City Council and its various Board and Commission meetings. Board and Commission meetings have all been adjusted to avoid days of religious observance. This calendar will be published for use by staff and the public. Date: November 17, 2015 To:Mayor and City Council From:Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Subject:Resolution No. 2015-114 Receiving Engineering Studies for 2016 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Approve Resolution No. 2015-114 receiving Engineering Studies for: BA-399 Tracy Avenue from Benton Avenue to TH-62 Reconstruction BA-420 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-421 Strachauer Park A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-422 Morningside A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction BA-438 White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction INT RODUCT ION: Public hearings are scheduled for December 8, 2015. The Engineering Studies are posted to the City's website and are linked below. Golf Terrace B: http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Engineering/Construction_Projects/Golf_Terrace_B/BA-420_FINAL%20ENGINEERING%20STUDY.pdf Strachauer Park A: http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Engineering/Construction_Projects/Strachauer_Park_A/BA-421_FINAL%20ENGINEERING%20STUDY.pdf Tracy (Benton to TH 62): http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Engineering/Construction_Projects/2016/TracyBentonto62/ENG_STUDY_110415_Tracy.pdf Morningside A / White Oaks C: http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Engineering/Construction_Projects/Morningside_A_White_Oaks_C/Morningside%20A%20&%20White%20Oaks%20C%20Final%20Feas%20Study%2011%2006%2015.pdf Morningside A / White Oaks C Appendix: http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Engineering/Construction_Projects/Morningside_A_White_Oaks_C/Moringside%20A%20White%20Oakc%20C%20FINAL%20Appendix%2011%206%2015.pdf ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2015-114 Receiving Engineering Studies RESOLUTION NO. 2015-114 RECEIVING ENGINEERING STUDIES FOR 2016 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS TRACY AVENUE FROM BENTON AVENUE TO TH 62, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-399 GOLF TERRACE B NEIGHBORHOOD, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-420 STRACHAUER PARK A NEIGHBORHOOD, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-421 MORNINGSIDE A NEIGHBORHOOD, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-422 WHITE OAKS C NEIGHBORHOOD, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-438 WHEREAS, at the request of Edina City Engineer, studies have been prepared by staff and consultant with reference to the proposed Improvement Nos. BA-399, BA-420, BA-421, BA-422, and BA-438, the improvement of Tracy Avenue, Golf Terrace B, Strachauer Park A, Morningside A, and White Oaks C, and these studies are hereby received by the Council on November 17, 2015; and WHEREAS, the studies provide information regarding whether the proposed improvements are necessary, cost- effective, and feasible; whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with said studies and the possible assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $380,000 (BA-399), $3,619,555 (BA-420), $2,143,335 (BA-421), $1,284,200 (BA- 422) and $480,600 (BA-438). 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 8th day of December, 2015, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 6:00 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 2015. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:David Nelson, Chief of Police Item Activity: Subject:Request f or Purchase: Motorola MCC7500 Radio Consoles f or our 911 Communications Center Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: That the Edina City Council authorize the Edina Police Department to execute a purchase order of f our (4) Motorola MCC7500 voice communication consoles, supporting equipment and labor in the amount of $300,206.00. INT RODUCT ION: The City of Edina’s Emergency 911 Communications Center uses the State of Minnesota ARMER (Allied Radio Matrix f or Emergency Response) Radio System to communicate with public safety responders and other agencies for work related needs. This network of radios is an essential tool to perform work duties and is our primary form of communication to dispatch emergency and non- emergency calls to first responders. The Edina 911 Center has been operating on Motorola Gold Elite Dispatch Consoles since the City of Edina joined the ARMER system in 2004. The current Gold Elite Consoles will become obsolete in April of 2016 when the state ARMER system will upgrade software that is only compatible with the new Motorola MCC7500 Radio Console we are requesting to purchase. AT TACHMENT S: Description Request for Purchase: Motorola MCC7500 Radio Consoles Motorola MCC7500 Edina Contract City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 11/17/2015 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Request for Purchase: Motorola MCC7500 Radio Consoles for our 911 Communications Center 08/28/2015 11/20/2015 Motorola Solutions 13108 Collections Center Drive Chicago, IL 60693 $300,206.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Minnesota State Contract Pricing 40071 Information/Background: The City of Edina’s Emergency 911 Communications Center uses the State of Minnesota ARMER (Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency Response) Radio System to communicate with public safety responders and other agencies for work related needs. This network of radios is an essential tool to perform work duties and is our primary form of communication to dispatch emergency and non- emergency calls to first responders. The Edina 911 Center has been operating on Motorola Gold Elite Dispatch Consoles since the City of Edina joined the ARMER system in 2004. The current Gold Elite Consoles will become obsolete in April of 2016 when the state ARMER system will upgrade software that is only compatible with the new Motorola MCC7500 Radio Console. Motorola Solutions is on Minnesota State Bid under contract pricing number 40071. Funding for this project was budgeted in the Capital Improvement Plan for January 2016; for $305,000.00, with $50,160.00 being funded from the E911 Account and the remainder from the Equipment Replacement Fund. This project was moved ahead 1 ½ months to meet scheduling, installation timelines and a discount for signing before November 20th. The cost of the project is within budget if the purchase is approved prior to November 20th, 2015 ($300,206.00). If we are unable to meet the November 20th, 2015 deadline, the $9,387.00 discount no longer applies and is added to the total ($309,593.00). Cost breakdown to follow: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CIP/Quote Funding Breakdown 2016 CIP Budgeted Amount: $305,000.00 Funding from Equipment Replacement Fund: $254,840.00 Funding from E 9-1-1 Account $ 50,160.00 2015 Quote amount: $300,206.00 Funding from Equipment Replacement Fund: $250,046.00 Funding from E 9-1-1 Account $ 50,160.00 Attached is the Motorola contract that has been reviewed by Roger Knutson. MCC 7500 Upgrade MOTOROLA, MOTO, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, and the Stylized M Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC and are used under license. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. © 2015 Motorola Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted City of Edina, MN August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions, Inc. | 1303 E. Algonquin Rd. | Schaumburg, IL 60196 | USA | Tel. + 1 847 576 5000 | Fax + 1 847 538 6020 August 28, 2015 Tony Martin Communications Manager Police Department City of Edina, MN 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Motorola MCC 7500 Upgrade Dear Mr. Martin: Motorola Solutions, Inc. (“Motorola”) is pleased to have the opportunity to provide the City of Edina, MN with quality communications equipment and services. Motorola's project team has taken great care to propose a solution to address your needs and provide unsurpassed value. Motorola's solution includes a combination of hardware, software, and services. Specifically, this solution provides three MCC 7500 Dispatch Console operator positions along with a patch position, dual site gateway and switches, two CCGWs, one SDM3000 Aux I/O server and spare equipment as well as the implementation and warranty services needed to support them. This proposal is subject to the terms and conditions in the enclosed Communications System Agreement, together with its Exhibits, and shall remain valid for a period of 60 days from the date of this cover letter. Motorola would be pleased to address any concerns Edina may have regarding the proposal. Any questions can be directed to Carrie Oster, Account Manager, at 612-834-4860. Our goal is to provide Edina with the best products and services available in the communications industry. We thank you for the opportunity to implement the proposed communications solution for you, and we hope to strengthen our relationship by implementing this project. Sincerely, Bill Burton Area Sales Manager MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. Page 3 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN SECTION: 1System Description MCC 7500 SOLUTION OVERVIEW FOR THE City of Edina, MN Motorola's proposed dispatch solution for the City of Edina, MN is our MCC 7500 Dispatch Console, offering IP- based seamless connectivity between Edina's dispatch operators and field personnel. The MCC 7500 Dispatch Console will provide Edina with a scalable and flexible system architecture, sophisticated network management and security, and an easy migration to future capabilities. Figure 1 - 1: MCC 7500 Dispatch Console, including desktop PC, headset, speakers, display, keyboard, mouse, microphone, and voice processor module The proposed solution for Edina includes three MCC 7500 Dispatch Consoles at City of Edina. Table 1 - 1 summarizes the proposed console equipment and peripherals included in our proposal. All licenses necessary for operation have also been included as part of the solution. Table 1 - 1: Proposed Equipment at City of Edina Qty Equipment Operator Positions 3 Personal Computer with Windows 7 3 Voice Processor Module (VPM) 6 Headset Jack 9 Desktop Speakers 3 Footswitch 3 Gooseneck Microphone 3 Instant Recall Recorder Port Addtional Equipment 2 Console LAN Switch 2 Console Site Router 2 GGM 8000 Gateway with a Conventional Channel Gateway Interface (CCGW) 1 GCP 8000 Conventional Site Controller 1 SDM 3000 Auxiliary Input/Output Server Page 4 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN CONSOLE CONNECTIVITY The proposed MCC 7500 Dispatch Consoles will connect into the ASTRO 25 master site at Golden Valley. A conceptual diagram of the proposed console connectivity has been provided in Figure 1 - 2. Figure 1 - 2: System connectivity for proposed solution. The solution will rely on T1 links provided by Edina for backhaul connectivity. The patch position for Edina will be set up as the fourth operator position in the dispatch room. The patch position includes the same equipment as the other three dispatch positions. All dispatch positions and the patch position include DES-OFB encryption. The City of Edina will supply the monitors as well as the existing back- up consolettes. Edina's existing logging recorder and the existing logging consolettes will be used for logging of the ARMER Talkgroups. Two T1 links will be provided by the City of Edina, These links will either be the two existing T1 links for the Gold Elite console or will be one of these T1 links and a new back-up T1 link to the Braemer site. Page 5 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN ELEMENTS OF THE MCC 7500 Figure 1 - 3: MCC 7500 Dispatch Console Components As proposed to Edina, each MCC 7500 Dispatch Consoles includes the following elements: Personal Computer (PC) The personal computer included with the console position runs Microsoft Windows 7, and is certified by Motorola to ensure that the dispatch software, voice cards, and secure cards are properly installed and configured. Headset Jack The dispatch console supports two headset jacks, both push-to-talk (PTT) and non-PTT-enabled for simultaneous use by the dispatch operator and a supervisor. The headset jack contains two volume controls for the separate adjustment of received radio and telephone audio. Gooseneck Microphone The microphone controls the dispatch console's general transmit and monitor features through two buttons on its base. The microphone can be fastened down or left loose. It can be used alone or in conjunction with a headset. Voice Processor Module (VPM) The secure VPM provides vocoding and audio processing for the dispatch console, and also serves as the hub for the console's speakers, microphone, footswitch, headset jacks, and recorders. Footswitch Each dispatch console includes a dual pedal footswitch that can be configured to control general transmit and monitor functions. Headset Port The telephone/headset port allows the connection of an external telephone to the dispatch console, allowing the operator to use a single headset to communicate on both the radio system and a telephone system Desktop Speakers Three audio speakers have been included with each console position and can be configured to transmit audio from a specific talkgroup or set of talkgroups. Each speaker is a self-contained unit, with individual volume controls and can be placed on a desktop, or mounted on a rack or computer display. Instant Recall Recorder (IRR) Port The IRR port enables the connection of a short-term audio recorder, which allows the recording and playback of recent audio received by the console. *PC specifications must be equal to or better than the following: Intel Xeon W3503 2.4GHz 1066MHz Dual Core or Intel Core 2 Duo E8300 2.83 6 MB / 1333 CPU Processor; Intel X38 Express Chipset; 80 GB 7200 rpm SATA 3.0 Gb/s NCQ Hard Drive; Integrated SATA Controller; 2GB RAM; Integrated High Definition Digital Audio; 16X Max SATA DVD+/-RW Drive; NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290, 256 MB Dual Head Graphics Processor; 256 MB Graphics Memory; Windows Vista Service Pack 2 or Windows 7 Professional (64 bit) Service Pack 1 Operating System. If Edina desires to reuse existing computers, a change order may be required for additional configuration services. Page 6 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT Per your request, we have included the following additional items to extend the functionality of the MCC 7500 to meet Edina's needs. SDM 3000 Auxiliary Input/Output Server The SDM 3000 provides console operators with the ability to control and monitor external devices, such as doors and lights, from the console user interface. The console interface uses icons to display the state of external devices via auxiliary inputs and outputs, which support momentary and latched inputs, as well as latched and interlocked latched outputs. GGM 8000 Gateway with a Conventional Channel Gateway Interface (CCGW) The GGM 8000 interfaces analog and ASTRO 25 conventional channels to your ASTRO 25 radio system. GCP 8000 Conventional Site Controller The GCP 8000 Conventional Site Controller supports site conventional operation where a Conventional Channel Gateway (CCGW) is located at an MCC 7500 console site. If the link between the dispatch site and the master site is lost, the GCP 8000 enables dispatchers to communicate over conventional resources. Page 7 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN SECTION: 2Implementation Plan STATEMENT OF WORK Motorola will install and configure the proposed equipment. Table 2 - 1 describes the tasks involved with installation and configuration. Table 2 - 1: Project Tasks and Responsibilities Tasks Motorola City of Edina, MN Deliverable Kickoff and Team Creation Assign a Project Manager as a single point of contact.✔✔ Conduct Kickoff meeting.✔✔ Defined Project Team Design Review Review the operational requirements.✔ Discuss the proposed cutover plan.✔ Establish a defined baseline for the system design and identify any special product requirements and their impact on system implementation. ✔ Review the System Design, Statement of Work, Project Schedule, and Acceptance Test Plans, and update the contract documents accordingly. ✔✔ Conduct site evaluations to capture site details of the system design and to determine site readiness.✔ Determine each site’s ability to accommodate proposed equipment based upon physical capacity.✔ Submit design review documents for approval. These documents form the basis of the system, which Motorola will manufacture, assemble, stage, and install. ✔ Approve design review documents.✔ Design review document delivered to and approved. Equipment Order and Manufacturing Process equipment order.✔ Manufacture equipment.✔ Equipment ordered and manufactured ready to ship to destination Page 8 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN Tasks Motorola City of Edina, MN Deliverable System Staging Set up and rack the system equipment on a site-by-site basis, as it will be configured in the field at each of the sites.✔ Label the cables with to/from information to specify interconnection for field installation and future servicing needs.✔ Complete the cabling/connecting of the subsystems to each other (“connectorization” of the subsystems).✔ Assemble required subsystems to assure system functionality.✔ Power up, program, and test all staged equipment.✔ Confirm system configuration and software compatibility to the existing system.✔ Complete programming of the fixed network equipment and consoles.✔ Perform factory acceptance test.✔ Factory acceptance test completed and equipment shipped to the field Equipment Shipment and Storage Ship all equipment to the field.✔ Provide secure warehousing for Motorola-provided equipment, at a location central to the sites.✔✔ Coordinate receipt of Motorola-provided equipment.✔✔ Receive Motorola-provided equipment and store in warehouse.✔ Inventory Motorola-provided equipment.✔ Equipment received and ready for installation Site Access Provide Site Access. ✔ Provide necessary buildings, equipment shelters, and towers for installation of the new equipment.✔ Ensure adequate electrical power in proper phase and voltage at the sites.✔ Ensure that sites meet space, grounding, power, and connectivity requirements for installation of equipment as required by R56 standards. ✔ Obtain all licensing and permitting for sites.✔ Access, permitting, and licensing for sites of equipment installation Page 9 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN Tasks Motorola City of Edina, MN Deliverable General Equipment Installation Deliver equipment from warehouse to site.✔ Provide network link resources for console connectivity to master site. All backhaul connectivity and associated equipment for all sites is the responsibility of the customer. This includes providing and installing the required T1 connectivity and interface modules, between the master site and the dispatch site, per Motorola specifications. ✔ Verify site link performance, prior to the interconnection of the Motorola-supplied equipment to the link equipment.✔✔ Provide any required system interconnections that are not specifically outlined in the system design, including dedicated phone circuits, microwave links or other types of connectivity. ✔ Install and brace equipment racks in accordance with R56 standards and state/local codes.✔ Install and terminate all network cables between site routers and network demarcation points, including microwave, leased lines, and Ethernet. ✔ Ensure that Type 1 and Type 2 AC suppression is installed to provide protection to the fixed network equipment and console operator positions. ✔ Install and terminate all power cabling from AC-powered equipment to surge suppression panels at the top of the rack.✔ Connect the appropriate equipment to the ground system in accordance with Motorola’s R56 Site Installation standards.✔ Apply Motorola-provided labeling to field installed equipment, racks, and cables.✔ Perform preliminary audit of installed equipment to ensure compliance with requirements.✔ Installation and performance of equipment and work not provided by Motorola.✔ Coordinate activities of Motorola subcontractors.✔ Coordinate activities of non-Motorola subcontractors.✔ Dual/Redundant T1 links from the dispatch center to the Master Site (MSO) will be supplied by the customer and will meet Motorola’s backhaul connectivity requirements. ✔ Customer is responsible for UPS/backup power for backhaul connectivity equipment.✔ All equipment installed and ready for optimization Page 10 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN Tasks Motorola City of Edina, MN Deliverable Console Installation Identify circuits for connection to console and a demarcation point located within 25 feet of the console interface.✔ Connect console to circuit demarcation points.✔ Ensure existing conventional stations are configured for 4 wire operation.✔ Install PC workstation w/ keyboard and mouse, and monitor.✔ Install a Voice Processor Module (VPM), two speakers, dual PTT footswitch, and gooseneck microphone in accordance with R56 Standards per position on desktop surface. ✔ Install all associated cabling in appropriately-sized split loom.✔ Install extension jumpers for mouse, keyboard, and monitor.✔ Install two headset jacks per position.✔ Install 1 new equipment racks.✔ Install a dedicated Local Area Network (LAN) to connect the proposed console positions.✔ Develop templates for console programming.✔✔ Perform console programming.✔ No computer monitors are provided with this proposal for the MCC console operator positions. The customer is supplying the computer monitors. ✔ No transport, storage or disposal of old equipment is included in this quote. The Customer is responsible for the removal and/or relocation of existing equipment. ✔ Console equipment installed and accepted System Optimization Verify that all equipment is operating properly and that all electrical and signal levels are set accurately.✔ Verify that all audio and data levels are at factory settings.✔ Verify communication interfaces between devices for proper operation.✔ Ensure that functionality meets manufacturers’ specifications and complies with the final configuration established during design review or system staging. ✔ Set up the consoles to perform dispatching operations on the radio system.✔ Completion of system optimization Page 11 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN Tasks Motorola City of Edina, MN Deliverable Functional Testing Verify the operational functionality and features of the consoles and the system supplied by Motorola, as contracted.✔ Witness the functional testing.✔ If any major task as contractually described fails, repeat that particular task after Motorola determines that corrective action has been taken. ✔ Document the results of the acceptance tests and present for review.✔ Review and approve final acceptance test results.✔ Successful completion of functional testing, approval of functional testing, and System Acceptance Cutover Develop a mutually agreed upon cutover plan based upon discussions held during the Design Review.✔✔ Conduct cutover meeting with user group representatives to address both how to mitigate technical and communication problem impacts to the users during cutover and during the general operation of the system. ✔ Notify the user groups affected by the cutover (date and time).✔ During cutover, follow the written plan and implement the defined contingencies, as required.✔ Conduct a roll call of all users working during the cutover, in an organized and methodical manner.✔ Provide Motorola with the subscriber information for input into the system database and activation, as required.✔ Customer is responsible for coordinating with the appropriate resources to provide training for the equipment provided in this proposal. ✔ Successful migration from old system to new system Finalize Documentation Provide an electronic as-built system manual on CD. The documentation will include the following: • System, site, and rack diagrams • Equipment inventory list • Functional acceptance test plan test sheets and results • Console programming template • Service and operator manuals Documentation will be delivered in Adobe PDF format. ✔ Receive and approve documentation.✔ Execute Final Project Acceptance.✔✔ All required documents are provided and approved. Final Project Acceptance Page 12 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN PROJECT SCHEDULE The estimated time for completion of the project is 4-6 months from Project Kickoff through Final Project Acceptance. A final project schedule will be developed based upon mutual agreement between Motorola and City of Edina at the Detailed Design Review (DDR). The dates for the installation and activation are highly dependent on the actual completion dates of the City of Edina, or their subcontractors, tasks associated with R56 upgrades, installation, cabling and providing unobstructed cable routes. The specific and detailed scheduled will be determined during the DDR. Page 13 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN SECTION: 3Lifecycle Support Services To maintain Edina's equipment, Motorola offers our standard commercial warranty as set forth in the Communications System Agreement. In addition to the standard warranty, Motorola is including customized services during the warranty, as summarized in Table 3 - 1. Upon request, Motorola will provide detailed statements of work that fully describe these proposed services. A description of the proposed services are included in this section. Table 3 - 1: Overview of Proposed Services Service Description:Warranty Period Post Warranty Period Infrastructure Repair with Advanced Replacement Included Optional 3 Years Onsite Infrastructure Response Included Optional 3 Years Network Monitoring Not Included Not Included Infrastructure Repair with Advanced Replacement Infrastructure Repair with Advanced Replacement provides for expedited replacement of the equipment in the proposed solution, whether it is manufactured by Motorola or by another vendor. When a component fails, Edina will be able to request a replacement and have it shipped immediately for use in the system, prior to sending the faulty component to Motorola for repair. When requesting a replacement component, Edina can choose to either keep the replacement component or send it back to Motorola once the original failed component is repaired and returned. Motorola will pay two-way shipping on all components shipped through this service. Onsite Infrastructure Response Onsite Infrastructure Response provides local qualified technicians who arrive at your location to diagnose and restore the system. Following proven response and restore processes, Motorola's Call Center contacts the local authorized service center in Edina's area and dispatches a qualified technician. Our case management and escalation process ensures that arrival of the technician on-site and system restoration comply with contracted response times. If the technician is unable to resolve the issue on site, the case is escalated to the Solutions Support Center (SSC) or product engineering teams for support as needed. Page 14 of 41 August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN SECTION: 4PRICING The following table provides a pricing breakdown for the proposed equipment and services. Table 4 - 1: Pricing breakdown for proposed equipment and services EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES SUMMARY Sale Price Total Equipment Price : $ 182,558.00 Project Services: $ 119,612.00 -$ -$ $ 119,612.00 7,063.00$ 360.00$ System Discount Based on Purchase Order by 11/20/2015 and Ship by 12/04/2015 (9,387.00)$ BASE SYSTEM GRAND TOTAL:$ 300,206.00 POST WARRANTY SERVICES OPTION 11,220.00$ 11,557.00$ Post Warranty Year One Post Warranty Year Two Post Warranty Year Three 11,904.00$ POST WARRANTY OPTION TOTAL $34,681.00 * NOTE 3: For the System Discount to apply, a PO, or Notice to Proceed Letter, must be submitted to Motorola by no later than November 20 2015 and Ship by December 4 2015 Equipment Description * NOTE 1: The Grand Total shown above does not include MN Sales Tax or any other applicable local, state or federal taxes. * NOTE 2: If a Performance Bond is not required, the price of the Performance Bond shown above may be deducted from the Grand Total shown above. 1st Year Warranty Services: Freight: Project Management/Post Sale Engineering/ Installation/ System Integration: CCSI/Staging: Training: System Integration Services Total: August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN SECTION 5Contractual Documentation Below please find attached our Communications System Agreement, including a standard Software License Agreement, and a Payment Schedule for the proposed solution, as well as Service Agreement Terms and Conditions for the included post-warranty services. Communications System Agreement Motorola Solutions, Inc. (“Motorola”) and City of Edina (“Customer”) enter into this “Agreement,” pursuant to which Customer will purchase and Motorola will sell the System, as described below. Motorola and Customer may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” For good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree as follows: Section 1 EXHIBITS The exhibits listed below are incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, the main body of this Agreement takes precedence over the exhibits and any inconsistency between Exhibits A through E will be resolved in their listed order. Exhibit A Motorola “Software License Agreement” Exhibit B “Payment Schedule” Exhibit C “Technical and Implementation Documents” C-1 “System Description” dated _August 2015_____________ C-2 “Implementation Plan” dated ___August 2015____________ C-3 “Lifecycle Support Services” dated ___August 2015____________ C-4 “Pricing” dated ___August 2015____________ Exhibit D Service Statement(s) of Work and “Service Terms and Conditions” (if applicable) Exhibit E “System Acceptance Certificate” Section 2 DEFINITIONS Capitalized terms used in this Agreement have the following meanings: 2.1. “Acceptance Tests” means those tests described in the Acceptance Test Plan. 2.2. “Administrative User Credentials” means an account that has total access over the operating system, files, end user accounts and passwords at either the System level or box level. Customer’s personnel with access to the Administrative User Credentials may be referred to as the Administrative User. 2.3. “Beneficial Use” means when Customer first uses the System or a Subsystem for operational purposes (excluding training or testing). 2.4. “Confidential Information” means any information that is disclosed in written, graphic, verbal, or machine-recognizable form, and is marked, designated, or identified at the time of disclosure as being confidential or its equivalent; or if the information is in verbal form, it is identified as confidential at the time of disclosure and is confirmed in writing within thirty (30) days of the disclosure. Confidential Information does not include any information that: is or becomes publicly known through no wrongful act of the receiving Party; is already known to the receiving Party without restriction when it is disclosed; is or becomes, rightfully and without breach of this Agreement, in the receiving Party’s possession without any obligation restricting disclosure; is independently developed by the receiving Party without breach of this Agreement; or is explicitly approved for release by written authorization of the disclosing Party. 2.5. “Contract Price” means the price for the System, excluding applicable sales or similar taxes and freight charges. 2.6. “Effective Date” means that date upon which the last Party executes this Agreement. 2.7. “Equipment” means the equipment that Customer purchases from Motorola under this Agreement. Equipment that is part of the System is described in the Equipment List. Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 1 2.8. “Force Majeure” means an event, circumstance, or act of a third party that is beyond a Party’s reasonable control (e.g., an act of God, an act of the public enemy, an act of a government entity, strikes or other labor disturbances, hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, floods, epidemics, embargoes, war, and riots). 2.9. “Infringement Claim” means a third party claim alleging that the Equipment manufactured by Motorola or the Motorola Software directly infringes a United States patent or copyright. 2.10. “Motorola Software” means Software that Motorola or its affiliated company owns. 2.11. “Non-Motorola Software” means Software that another party owns. 2.12. “Open Source Software” (also called “freeware” or “shareware”) means software with either freely obtainable source code, license for modification, or permission for free distribution. 2.13. “Proprietary Rights” means the patents, patent applications, inventions, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks, trade names, mask works, know-how, and other intellectual property rights in and to the Equipment and Software, including those created or produced by Motorola under this Agreement and any corrections, bug fixes, enhancements, updates or modifications to or derivative works from the Software whether made by Motorola or another party. 2.14. “Software” means the Motorola Software and Non-Motorola Software, in object code format that is furnished with the System or Equipment. 2.15. “Specifications” means the functionality and performance requirements that are described in the Technical and Implementation Documents. 2.16. “Subsystem” means a major part of the System that performs specific functions or operations. Subsystems are described in the Technical and Implementation Documents. 2.17. “System” means the Equipment, Software, and incidental hardware and materials that are combined together into an integrated system; the System is described in the Technical and Implementation Documents. 2.18. “System Acceptance” means the Acceptance Tests have been successfully completed. 2.19. “Warranty Period” means one (1) year from the date of System Acceptance or Beneficial Use, whichever occurs first. Section 3 SCOPE OF AGREEMENT AND TERM 3.1. SCOPE OF WORK. Motorola will provide, install and test the System, and perform its other contractual responsibilities, all in accordance with this Agreement. Customer will perform its contractual responsibilities in accordance with this Agreement. 3.2. CHANGE ORDERS. Either Party may request changes within the general scope of this Agreement. If a requested change causes an increase or decrease in the cost or time required to perform this Agreement, the Parties will agree to an equitable adjustment of the Contract Price, Performance Schedule, or both, and will reflect the adjustment in a change order. Neither Party is obligated to perform requested changes unless both Parties execute a written change order. 3.3. TERM. Unless terminated in accordance with other provisions of this Agreement or extended by mutual agreement of the Parties, the term of this Agreement begins on the Effective Date and continues until the date of Final Project Acceptance or expiration of the Warranty Period, whichever occurs last. 3.4. ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT OR SOFTWARE. For three (3) years after the Effective Date, Customer may order additional Equipment or Software if it is then available. Each order must refer to this Agreement and must specify the pricing and delivery terms. Notwithstanding any additional or contrary Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 2 terms in the order, the applicable provisions of this Agreement (except for pricing, delivery, passage of title and risk of loss to Equipment, warranty commencement, and payment terms) will govern the purchase and sale of the additional Equipment or Software. Title and risk of loss to additional Equipment will pass at delivery, warranty will commence upon delivery, and payment is due within twenty (20) days after the invoice date. Motorola will send Customer an invoice as the additional Equipment is shipped or Software is licensed. Alternatively, Customer may register with and place orders through Motorola Online (“MOL”), and this Agreement will be the “Underlying Agreement” for those MOL transactions rather than the MOL On-Line Terms and Conditions of Sale. MOL registration and other information may be found at http://www.motorola.com/businessandgovernment/ and the MOL telephone number is (800) 814-0601. 3.5. MAINTENANCE SERVICE. During the Warranty Period, in addition to warranty services, Motorola will provide maintenance services for the Equipment and support for the Motorola Software pursuant to the Statement of Work set forth in Exhibit D. Those services and support are included in the Contract Price. If Customer wishes to purchase additional maintenance and support services for the Equipment during the Warranty Period, or any maintenance and support services for the Equipment either during the Warranty Period or after the Warranty Period, the description of and pricing for the services will be set forth in a separate document. If Customer wishes to purchase extended support for the Motorola Software after the Warranty Period, it may do so by ordering software subscription services. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing, the terms and conditions applicable to those maintenance, support or software subscription services will be Motorola’s standard Service Terms and Conditions, together with the appropriate statements of work. 3.6. MOTOROLA SOFTWARE. Any Motorola Software, including subsequent releases, is licensed to Customer solely in accordance with the Software License Agreement. Customer hereby accepts and agrees to abide by all of the terms and restrictions of the Software License Agreement. 3.7. NON-MOTOROLA SOFTWARE. Any Non-Motorola Software is licensed to Customer in accordance with the standard license, terms, and restrictions of the copyright owner on the Effective Date unless the copyright owner has granted to Motorola the right to sublicense the Non-Motorola Software pursuant to the Software License Agreement, in which case it applies and the copyright owner will have all of Licensor’s rights and protections under the Software License Agreement. Motorola makes no representations or warranties of any kind regarding Non-Motorola Software. Non-Motorola Software may include Open Source Software. All Open Source Software is licensed to Customer in accordance with, and Customer agrees to abide by, the provisions of the standard license of the copyright owner and not the Software License Agreement. Upon request by Customer, Motorola will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine whether any Open Source Software will be provided under this Agreement; and if so, identify the Open Source Software and provide to Customer a copy of the applicable standard license (or specify where that license may be found); and provide to Customer a copy of the Open Source Software source code if it is publicly available without charge (although a distribution fee or a charge for related services may be applicable). 3.8. OPTIONAL EQUIPMENT OR SOFTWARE. This paragraph applies only if a “Priced Options” exhibit is shown in Section 1, or if the parties amend this Agreement to add a Priced Options exhibit. During the term of the option as stated in the Priced Options exhibit (or if no term is stated, then for one (1) year after the Effective Date), Customer has the right and option to purchase the equipment, software, and related services that are described in the Priced Options exhibit. Customer may exercise this option by giving written notice to Seller which must designate what equipment, software, and related services Customer is selecting (including quantities, if applicable). To the extent they apply, the terms and conditions of this Agreement will govern the transaction; however, the parties acknowledge that certain provisions must be agreed upon, and they agree to negotiate those in good faith promptly after Customer delivers the option exercise notice. Examples of provisions that may need to be negotiated are: specific lists of deliverables, statements of work, acceptance test plans, delivery and implementation schedules, payment terms, maintenance and support provisions, additions to or modifications of the Software License Agreement, hosting terms, and modifications to the acceptance and warranty provisions. Section 4 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 3 The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance. Section 5 CONTRACT PRICE, PAYMENT AND INVOICING 5.1. CONTRACT PRICE. The Contract Price in U.S. dollars is $________________________. If applicable, a pricing summary is included with the Payment Schedule. Motorola has priced the services, Software, and Equipment as an integrated system. A reduction in Software or Equipment quantities, or services, may affect the overall Contract Price, including discounts if applicable. 5.2. INVOICING AND PAYMENT. Motorola will submit invoices to Customer according to the Payment Schedule. Except for a payment that is due on the Effective Date, Customer will make payments to Motorola within twenty (20) days after the date of each invoice. Customer will make payments when due in the form of a wire transfer, check, or cashier’s check from a U.S. financial institution. Overdue invoices will bear simple interest at the maximum allowable rate. For reference, the Federal Tax Identification Number for Motorola Solutions, Inc. is 36-1115800. 5.3. FREIGHT, TITLE, AND RISK OF LOSS. Motorola will pre-pay and add all freight charges to the invoices. Title to the Equipment will pass to Customer upon shipment. Title to Software will not pass to Customer at any time. Risk of loss will pass to Customer upon delivery of the Equipment to the Customer. Motorola will pack and ship all Equipment in accordance with good commercial practices. 5.4. INVOICING AND SHIPPING ADDRESSES. Invoices will be sent to the Customer at the following address: ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ The address which is the ultimate destination where the Equipment will be delivered to Customer is: ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ The Equipment will be shipped to the Customer at the following address (insert if this information is known): ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Customer may change this information by giving written notice to Motorola. Section 6 SITES AND SITE CONDITIONS 6.1. ACCESS TO SITES. In addition to its responsibilities described elsewhere in this Agreement, Customer will provide a designated project manager; all necessary construction and building permits, zoning variances, licenses, and any other approvals that are necessary to develop or use the sites and mounting locations; and access to the work sites or vehicles identified in the Technical and Implementation Documents as reasonably requested by Motorola so that it may perform its duties in accordance with the Performance Schedule and Statement of Work. If the Statement of Work so indicates, Motorola may assist Customer in the local building permit process. 6.2. SITE CONDITIONS. Customer will ensure that all work sites it provides will be safe, secure, and in compliance with all applicable industry and OSHA standards. To the extent applicable and unless the Statement of Work states to the contrary, Customer will ensure that these work sites have adequate: physical space; air conditioning and other environmental conditions; adequate and appropriate electrical power outlets, distribution, equipment and connections; and adequate telephone or other communication lines (including modem access and adequate interfacing networking capabilities), all for the installation, use and maintenance of the System. Before installing the Equipment or Software at a work site, Motorola may inspect the work site and advise Customer of any apparent deficiencies or non-conformities with the Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 4 requirements of this Section. This Agreement is predicated upon normal soil conditions as defined by the version of E.I.A. standard RS-222 in effect on the Effective Date. 6.3. SITE ISSUES. If a Party determines that the sites identified in the Technical and Implementation Documents are no longer available or desired, or if subsurface, structural, adverse environmental or latent conditions at any site differ from those indicated in the Technical and Implementation Documents, the Parties will promptly investigate the conditions and will select replacement sites or adjust the installation plans and specifications as necessary. If change in sites or adjustment to the installation plans and specifications causes a change in the cost or time to perform, the Parties will equitably amend the Contract Price, Performance Schedule, or both, by a change order. Section 7 TRAINING Any training to be provided by Motorola to Customer will be described in the Statement of Work. Customer will notify Motorola immediately if a date change for a scheduled training program is required. If Motorola incurs additional costs because Customer reschedules a training program less than thirty (30) days before its scheduled start date, Motorola may recover these additional costs. Section 8 SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE 8.1. COMMENCEMENT OF ACCEPTANCE TESTING. Motorola will provide to Customer at least ten (10) days notice before the Acceptance Tests commence. System testing will occur only in accordance with the Acceptance Test Plan. 8.2. SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE. System Acceptance will occur upon successful completion of the Acceptance Tests. Upon System Acceptance, the Parties will memorialize this event by promptly executing a System Acceptance Certificate. If the Acceptance Test Plan includes separate tests for individual Subsystems or phases of the System, acceptance of the individual Subsystem or phase will occur upon the successful completion of the Acceptance Tests for the Subsystem or phase, and the Parties will promptly execute an acceptance certificate for the Subsystem or phase. If Customer believes the System has failed the completed Acceptance Tests, Customer will provide to Motorola a written notice that includes the specific details of the failure. If Customer does not provide to Motorola a failure notice within thirty (30) days after completion of the Acceptance Tests, System Acceptance will be deemed to have occurred as of the completion of the Acceptance Tests. Minor omissions or variances in the System that do not materially impair the operation of the System as a whole will not postpone System Acceptance or Subsystem acceptance, but will be corrected according to a mutually agreed schedule. 8.3. BENEFICIAL USE. Customer acknowledges that Motorola’s ability to perform its implementation and testing responsibilities may be impeded if Customer begins using the System before System Acceptance. Therefore, Customer will not commence Beneficial Use before System Acceptance without Motorola’s prior written authorization, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Motorola is not responsible for System performance deficiencies that occur during unauthorized Beneficial Use. Upon commencement of Beneficial Use, Customer assumes responsibility for the use and operation of the System. 8.4 FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. Final Project Acceptance will occur after System Acceptance when all deliverables and other work have been completed. When Final Project Acceptance occurs, the parties will promptly memorialize this final event by so indicating on the System Acceptance Certificate. Section 9 REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 9.1. SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY. Motorola represents that the System will perform in accordance with the Specifications in all material respects. Upon System Acceptance or Beneficial Use, whichever occurs first, this System functionality representation is fulfilled. Motorola is not responsible for System performance deficiencies that are caused by ancillary equipment not furnished by Motorola which is attached to or used in connection with the System or for reasons or parties beyond Motorola’s control, such as natural causes; the construction of a building that adversely affects the microwave path reliability Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 5 or radio frequency (RF) coverage; the addition of frequencies at System sites that cause RF interference or intermodulation; or Customer changes to load usage or configuration outside the Specifications. 9.2. EQUIPMENT WARRANTY. During the Warranty Period, Motorola warrants that the Equipment under normal use and service will be free from material defects in materials and workmanship. If System Acceptance is delayed beyond six (6) months after shipment of the Equipment by events or causes within Customer’s control, this warranty expires eighteen (18) months after the shipment of the Equipment. 9.3. MOTOROLA SOFTWARE WARRANTY. Unless otherwise stated in the Software License Agreement, during the Warranty Period, Motorola warrants the Motorola Software in accordance with the terms of the Software License Agreement and the provisions of this Section 9 that are applicable to the Motorola Software. If System Acceptance is delayed beyond six (6) months after shipment of the Motorola Software by events or causes within Customer’s control, this warranty expires eighteen (18) months after the shipment of the Motorola Software. TO THE EXTENT, IF ANY, THAT THERE IS A SEPARATE LICENSE AGREEMENT PACKAGED WITH, OR PROVIDED ELECTRONICALLY WITH, A PARTICULAR PRODUCT THAT BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON AN ACT OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE END USER, THEN THAT AGREEMENT SUPERCEDES THIS SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT AS TO THE END USER OF EACH SUCH PRODUCT. 9.4. EXCLUSIONS TO EQUIPMENT AND MOTOROLA SOFTWARE WARRANTIES. These warranties do not apply to: (i) defects or damage resulting from: use of the Equipment or Motorola Software in other than its normal, customary, and authorized manner; accident, liquids, neglect, or acts of God; testing, maintenance, disassembly, repair, installation, alteration, modification, or adjustment not provided or authorized in writing by Motorola; Customer’s failure to comply with all applicable industry and OSHA standards; (ii) breakage of or damage to antennas unless caused directly by defects in material or workmanship; (iii) Equipment that has had the serial number removed or made illegible; (iv) batteries (because they carry their own separate limited warranty) or consumables; (v) freight costs to ship Equipment to the repair depot; (vi) scratches or other cosmetic damage to Equipment surfaces that does not affect the operation of the Equipment; and (vii) normal or customary wear and tear. 9.5. WARRANTY CLAIMS. To assert a warranty claim, Customer must notify Motorola in writing of the claim before the expiration of the Warranty Period. Upon receipt of this notice, Motorola will investigate the warranty claim. If this investigation confirms a valid warranty claim, Motorola will (at its option and at no additional charge to Customer) repair the defective Equipment or Motorola Software, replace it with the same or equivalent product, or refund the price of the defective Equipment or Motorola Software. That action will be the full extent of Motorola’s liability for the warranty claim. If this investigation indicates the warranty claim is not valid, then Motorola may invoice Customer for responding to the claim on a time and materials basis using Motorola’s then current labor rates. Repaired or replaced product is warranted for the balance of the original applicable warranty period. All replaced products or parts will become the property of Motorola. 9.6. ORIGINAL END USER IS COVERED. These express limited warranties are extended by Motorola to the original user purchasing the System for commercial, industrial, or governmental use only, and are not assignable or transferable. 9.7. DISCLAIMER OF OTHER WARRANTIES. THESE WARRANTIES ARE THE COMPLETE WARRANTIES FOR THE EQUIPMENT AND MOTOROLA SOFTWARE PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT AND ARE GIVEN IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES. MOTOROLA DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Section 10 DELAYS 10.1. FORCE MAJEURE. Neither Party will be liable for its non-performance or delayed performance if caused by a Force Majeure. A Party that becomes aware of a Force Majeure that will significantly delay performance will notify the other Party promptly (but in no event later than fifteen days) after it discovers Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 6 the Force Majeure. If a Force Majeure occurs, the Parties will execute a change order to extend the Performance Schedule for a time period that is reasonable under the circumstances. 10.2. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE DELAYS CAUSED BY CUSTOMER. If Customer (including its other contractors) delays the Performance Schedule, it will make the promised payments according to the Payment Schedule as if no delay occurred; and the Parties will execute a change order to extend the Performance Schedule and, if requested, compensate Motorola for all reasonable charges incurred because of the delay. Delay charges may include costs incurred by Motorola or its subcontractors for additional freight, warehousing and handling of Equipment; extension of the warranties; travel; suspending and re-mobilizing the work; additional engineering, project management, and standby time calculated at then current rates; and preparing and implementing an alternative implementation plan. Section 11 DISPUTES The Parties will use the following procedure to address any dispute arising under this Agreement (a “Dispute”). 11.1. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State in which the System is installed. 11.2. NEGOTIATION. Either Party may initiate the Dispute resolution procedures by sending a notice of Dispute (“Notice of Dispute”). The Parties will attempt to resolve the Dispute promptly through good faith negotiations including 1) timely escalation of the Dispute to executives who have authority to settle the Dispute and who are at a higher level of management than the persons with direct responsibility for the matter and 2) direct communication between the executives. If the Dispute has not been resolved within ten (10) days from the Notice of Dispute, the Parties will proceed to mediation. 11.3 MEDIATION. The Parties will choose an independent mediator within thirty (30) days of a notice to mediate from either Party (“Notice of Mediation”). Neither Party may unreasonably withhold consent to the selection of a mediator. If the Parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, either Party may request that American Arbitration Association nominate a mediator. Each Party will bear its own costs of mediation, but the Parties will share the cost of the mediator equally. Each Party will participate in the mediation in good faith and will be represented at the mediation by a business executive with authority to settle the Dispute. 11.4. LITIGATION, VENUE and JURISDICTION. If a Dispute remains unresolved for sixty (60) days after receipt of the Notice of Mediation, either Party may then submit the Dispute to a court of competent jurisdiction in the state in which the System is installed. Each Party irrevocably agrees to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in such state over any claim or matter arising under or in connection with this Agreement. 11.5. CONFIDENTIALITY. All communications pursuant to subsections 11.2 and 11.3 will be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of applicable rules of evidence and any additional confidentiality protections provided by applicable law. The use of these Dispute resolution procedures will not be construed under the doctrines of laches, waiver or estoppel to affect adversely the rights of either Party. Section 12 DEFAULT AND TERMINATION 12.1 DEFAULT BY A PARTY. If either Party fails to perform a material obligation under this Agreement, the other Party may consider the non-performing Party to be in default (unless a Force Majeure causes the failure) and may assert a default claim by giving the non-performing Party a written and detailed notice of default. Except for a default by Customer for failing to pay any amount when due under this Agreement which must be cured immediately, the defaulting Party will have thirty (30) days after receipt of the notice of default to either cure the default or, if the default is not curable within thirty (30) days, provide a written cure plan. The defaulting Party will begin implementing the cure plan Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 7 immediately after receipt of notice by the other Party that it approves the plan. If Customer is the defaulting Party, Motorola may stop work on the project until it approves the Customer’s cure plan. 12.2. FAILURE TO CURE. If a defaulting Party fails to cure the default as provided above in Section 12.1, unless otherwise agreed in writing, the non-defaulting Party may terminate any unfulfilled portion of this Agreement. In the event of termination for default, the defaulting Party will promptly return to the non- defaulting Party any of its Confidential Information. If Customer is the non-defaulting Party, terminates this Agreement as permitted by this Section, and completes the System through a third Party, Customer may as its exclusive remedy recover from Motorola reasonable costs incurred to complete the System to a capability not exceeding that specified in this Agreement less the unpaid portion of the Contract Price. Customer will mitigate damages and provide Motorola with detailed invoices substantiating the charges. Section 13 INDEMNIFICATION 13.1. GENERAL INDEMNITY BY MOTOROLA. Motorola will indemnify and hold Customer harmless from any and all liability, expense, judgment, suit, cause of action, or demand for personal injury, death, or direct damage to tangible property which may accrue against Customer to the extent it is caused by the negligence of Motorola, its subcontractors, or their employees or agents, while performing their duties under this Agreement, if Customer gives Motorola prompt, written notice of any the claim or suit. Customer will cooperate with Motorola in its defense or settlement of the claim or suit. This section sets forth the full extent of Motorola’s general indemnification of Customer from liabilities that are in any way related to Motorola’s performance under this Agreement. 13.2. PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. 13.2.1. Motorola will defend at its expense any suit brought against Customer to the extent it is based on a third-party claim alleging that the Equipment manufactured by Motorola or the Motorola Software (“Motorola Product”) directly infringes a United States patent or copyright (“Infringement Claim”). Motorola’s duties to defend and indemnify are conditioned upon: Customer promptly notifying Motorola in writing of the Infringement Claim; Motorola having sole control of the defense of the suit and all negotiations for its settlement or compromise; and Customer providing to Motorola cooperation and, if requested by Motorola, reasonable assistance in the defense of the Infringement Claim. In addition to Motorola’s obligation to defend, and subject to the same conditions, Motorola will pay all damages finally awarded against Customer by a court of competent jurisdiction for an Infringement Claim or agreed to, in writing, by Motorola in settlement of an Infringement Claim. 13.2.2. If an Infringement Claim occurs, or in Motorola's opinion is likely to occur, Motorola may at its option and expense: (a) procure for Customer the right to continue using the Motorola Product; (b) replace or modify the Motorola Product so that it becomes non-infringing while providing functionally equivalent performance; or (c) accept the return of the Motorola Product and grant Customer a credit for the Motorola Product, less a reasonable charge for depreciation. The depreciation amount will be calculated based upon generally accepted accounting standards. 13.2.3. Motorola will have no duty to defend or indemnify for any Infringement Claim that is based upon: (a) the combination of the Motorola Product with any software, apparatus or device not furnished by Motorola; (b) the use of ancillary equipment or software not furnished by Motorola and that is attached to or used in connection with the Motorola Product; (c) Motorola Product designed or manufactured in accordance with Customer’s designs, specifications, guidelines or instructions, if the alleged infringement would not have occurred without such designs, specifications, guidelines or instructions; (d) a modification of the Motorola Product by a party other than Motorola; (e) use of the Motorola Product in a manner for which the Motorola Product was not designed or that is inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement; or (f) the failure by Customer to install an enhancement release to the Motorola Software that is intended to correct the claimed infringement. In no event will Motorola’s liability resulting from its indemnity obligation to Customer extend in any way to royalties payable on a per use basis or the Customer’s revenues, or any royalty basis other than a reasonable royalty based upon revenue derived by Motorola from Customer from sales or license of the infringing Motorola Product. Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 8 13.2.4. This Section 13 provides Customer’s sole and exclusive remedies and Motorola’s entire liability in the event of an Infringement Claim. Customer has no right to recover and Motorola has no obligation to provide any other or further remedies, whether under another provision of this Agreement or any other legal theory or principle, in connection with an Infringement Claim. In addition, the rights and remedies provided in this Section 13 are subject to and limited by the restrictions set forth in Section 14. Section 14 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Except for personal injury or death, Motorola's total liability, whether for breach of contract, warranty, negligence, strict liability in tort, indemnification, or otherwise, will be limited to the direct damages recoverable under law, but not to exceed the price of the Equipment, Software, or services with respect to which losses or damages are claimed. ALTHOUGH THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES OR DAMAGES, THEY AGREE THAT MOTOROLA WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY COMMERCIAL LOSS; INCONVENIENCE; LOSS OF USE, TIME, DATA, GOOD WILL, REVENUES, PROFITS OR SAVINGS; OR OTHER SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN ANY WAY RELATED TO OR ARISING FROM THIS AGREEMENT, THE SALE OR USE OF THE EQUIPMENT OR SOFTWARE, OR THE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES BY MOTOROLA PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. This limitation of liability provision survives the expiration or termination of the Agreement and applies notwithstanding any contrary provision. No action for contract breach or otherwise relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement may be brought more than one (1) year after the accrual of the cause of action, except for money due upon an open account. Section 15 CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROPRIETARY RIGHTS 15.1. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. During the term of this Agreement, the parties may provide each other with Confidential Information. Each Party will: maintain the confidentiality of the other Party’s Confidential Information and not disclose it to any third party, except as authorized by the disclosing Party in writing or as required by a court of competent jurisdiction; restrict disclosure of the Confidential Information to its employees who have a “need to know” and not copy or reproduce the Confidential Information; take necessary and appropriate precautions to guard the confidentiality of the Confidential Information, including informing its employees who handle the Confidential Information that it is confidential and is not to be disclosed to others, but these precautions will be at least the same degree of care that the receiving Party applies to its own confidential information and will not be less than reasonable care; and use the Confidential Information only in furtherance of the performance of this Agreement. Confidential Information is and will at all times remain the property of the disclosing Party, and no grant of any proprietary rights in the Confidential Information is given or intended, including any express or implied license, other than the limited right of the recipient to use the Confidential Information in the manner and to the extent permitted by this Agreement. 15.1.2. Recipient is not obligated to maintain as confidential, Confidential Information that Recipient can demonstrate by documentation (i) is now available or becomes available to the public without breach of this agreement; (ii) is explicitly approved for release by written authorization of Discloser; (iii) is lawfully obtained from a third party or parties without a duty of confidentiality; (iv) is known to the Recipient prior to such disclosure; or (v) is independently developed by Recipient without the use of any of Discloser’s Confidential Information or any breach of this agreement. 15.1.3. All Confidential Information remains the property of the discloser and will not be copied or reproduced without the express written permission of the Discloser, except for copies that are absolutely necessary in order to fulfill this Agreement. Within ten (10) days of receipt of Discloser’s written request, Recipient will return all Confidential Information to Discloser along with all copies and portions thereof, or certify in writing that all such Confidential Information has been destroyed. However, Recipient may retain one (1) archival copy of the Confidential Information that it may use only in case of a dispute concerning this Agreement. No license, express or implied, in the Confidential Information is granted other than to use the Confidential Information in the manner and to the extent authorized by this Agreement. The Discloser warrants that it is authorized to disclose any Confidential Information it discloses pursuant to this Agreement. Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 9 15.1.4. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. All data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Motorola in performing this Agreement is subject to the provisions of Minn. Stat. Ch. 13 et. seq. (the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act) and, pursuant to that statute, Motorola must comply with the requirements of that statute as if it were a government entity. All remedies set forth in Minn. Stat. § 13.08 shall also apply to Motorola. Motorola is not required to provide public data to the public if that same data is available from the CUSTOMER, unless stated otherwise in this Agreement. 15.2. PRESERVATION OF MOTOROLA’S PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. Motorola, the third party manufacturer of any Equipment, and the copyright owner of any Non-Motorola Software own and retain all of their respective Proprietary Rights in the Equipment and Software, and nothing in this Agreement is intended to restrict their Proprietary Rights. All intellectual property developed, originated, or prepared by Motorola in connection with providing to Customer the Equipment, Software, or related services remain vested exclusively in Motorola, and this Agreement does not grant to Customer any shared development rights of intellectual property. Except as explicitly provided in the Software License Agreement, Motorola does not grant to Customer, either directly or by implication, estoppel, or otherwise, any right, title or interest in Motorola’s Proprietary Rights. Customer will not modify, disassemble, peel components, decompile, otherwise reverse engineer or attempt to reverse engineer, derive source code or create derivative works from, adapt, translate, merge with other software, reproduce, distribute, sublicense, sell or export the Software, or permit or encourage any third party to do so. The preceding sentence does not apply to Open Source Software which is governed by the standard license of the copyright owner. Section 16 GENERAL 16.1. TAXES. The Contract Price does not include any excise, sales, lease, use, property, or other taxes, assessments or duties, all of which will be paid by Customer except as exempt by law. If Motorola is required to pay any of these taxes, Motorola will send an invoice to Customer and Customer will pay to Motorola the amount of the taxes (including any interest and penalties) within twenty (20) days after the date of the invoice. Customer will be solely responsible for reporting the Equipment for personal property tax purposes, and Motorola will be solely responsible for reporting taxes on its income or net worth. 16.2. ASSIGNABILITY AND SUBCONTRACTING. Except as provided herein, neither Party may assign this Agreement or any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempted assignment, delegation, or transfer without the necessary consent will be void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Motorola may assign this Agreement to any of its affiliates or its right to receive payment without the prior consent of Customer. In addition, in the event Motorola separates one or more of its businesses (each a “Separated Business”), whether by way of a sale, establishment of a joint venture, spin-off or otherwise (each a “Separation Event”), Motorola may, without the prior written consent of the other Party and at no additional cost to Motorola, assign this Agreement such that it will continue to benefit the Separated Business and its affiliates (and Motorola and its affiliates, to the extent applicable) following the Separation Event. Motorola may subcontract any of the work, but subcontracting will not relieve Motorola of its duties under this Agreement. 16.3 WAIVER. Failure or delay by either Party to exercise a right or power under this Agreement will not be a waiver of the right or power. For a waiver of a right or power to be effective, it must be in a writing signed by the waiving Party. An effective waiver of a right or power will not be construed as either a future or continuing waiver of that same right or power, or the waiver of any other right or power. 16.4. SEVERABILITY. If a court of competent jurisdiction renders any part of this Agreement invalid or unenforceable, that part will be severed and the remainder of this Agreement will continue in full force and effect. 16.5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS. Each Party will perform its duties under this Agreement as an independent contractor. The Parties and their personnel will not be considered to be employees or agents of the other Party. Nothing in this Agreement will be interpreted as granting either Party the right Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 10 or authority to make commitments of any kind for the other. This Agreement will not constitute, create, or be interpreted as a joint venture, partnership or formal business organization of any kind. 16.6. HEADINGS AND SECTION REFERENCES. The section headings in this Agreement are inserted only for convenience and are not to be construed as part of this Agreement or as a limitation of the scope of the particular section to which the heading refers. This Agreement will be fairly interpreted in accordance with its terms and conditions and not for or against either Party. 16.7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, including all Exhibits, constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties regarding the subject matter of the Agreement and supersedes all previous agreements, proposals, and understandings, whether written or oral, relating to this subject matter. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. A facsimile copy or computer image, such as a PDF or tiff image, or a signature shall be treated as and shall have the same effect as an original signature. In addition, a true and correct facsimile copy or computer image of this Agreement shall be treated as and shall have the same effect as an original signed copy of this document. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by authorized representatives of both Parties. The preprinted terms and conditions found on any Customer purchase order, acknowledgment or other form will not be considered an amendment or modification of this Agreement, even if a representative of each Party signs that document. 16.8. NOTICES. Notices required under this Agreement to be given by one Party to the other must be in writing and either personally delivered or sent to the address shown below by certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid (or by a recognized courier service, such as Federal Express, UPS, or DHL), or by facsimile with correct answerback received, and will be effective upon receipt: Motorola Solutions, Inc. Customer Attn: ______________________________ Attn: ______________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ fax: ______________________________ fax: _______________________________ 16.9. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS. Each Party will comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and rules concerning the performance of this Agreement or use of the System. Customer will obtain and comply with all Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses and authorizations required for the installation, operation and use of the System before the scheduled installation of the Equipment. Although Motorola might assist Customer in the preparation of its FCC license applications, neither Motorola nor any of its employees is an agent or representative of Customer in FCC or other matters. 16.10. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. Each Party represents that it has obtained all necessary approvals, consents and authorizations to enter into this Agreement and to perform its duties under this Agreement; the person executing this Agreement on its behalf has the authority to do so; upon execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Parties, it is a valid and binding contract, enforceable in accordance with its terms; and the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement does not violate any bylaw, charter, regulation, law or any other governing authority of the Party. 16.11. ADMINISTRATOR LEVEL ACCOUNT ACCESS. Motorola will provide Customer with Administrative User Credentials. Customer agrees to only grant Administrative User Credentials to those personnel with the training or experience to correctly use the access. Customer is responsible for protecting Administrative User Credentials from disclosure and maintaining Credential validity by, among other things, updating passwords when required. Customer may be asked to provide valid Administrative User Credentials when in contact with Motorola System support. Customer understands that changes made as the Administrative User can significantly impact the performance of the System. Customer agrees that it will be solely responsible for any negative impact on the System or its users by any such changes. System issues occurring as a result of changes made by an Administrative User may impact Motorola’s ability to perform its obligations under the Agreement or its Maintenance and Support Agreement. In such cases, a revision to the appropriate provisions of the Agreement, including the Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 11 Statement of Work, may be necessary. To the extent Motorola provides assistance to correct any issues caused by or arising out of the use of or failure to maintain Administrative User Credentials, Motorola will be entitled to bill Customer and Customer will pay Motorola on a time and materials basis for resolving the issue. 16.12. SURVIVAL OF TERMS. The following provisions will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement for any reason: Section 3.6 (Motorola Software); Section 3.7 (Non-Motorola Software); if any payment obligations exist, Sections 5.1 and 5.2 (Contract Price and Invoicing and Payment); Subsection 9.7 (Disclaimer of Implied Warranties); Section 11 (Disputes); Section 14 (Limitation of Liability); and Section 15 (Confidentiality and Proprietary Rights); and all of the General provisions in Section 16. Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 12 The Parties hereby enter into this Agreement as of the Effective Date. Motorola Solutions, Inc. Customer By: ______________________________ By: ______________________________ Name: ___________________________ Name: ____________________________ Title: ____________________________ Title: _____________________________ Date: ____________________________ Date: ____________________________ Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 13 Exhibit A SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT This Exhibit A Software License Agreement ("Agreement") is between Motorola Solutions, Inc., (“Motorola"), and City of Edina (“Licensee”). For good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: Section 1 DEFINITIONS 1.1 “Designated Products” means products provided by Motorola to Licensee with which or for which the Software and Documentation is licensed for use. 1.2 “Documentation” means product and software documentation that specifies technical and performance features and capabilities, and the user, operation and training manuals for the Software (including all physical or electronic media upon which such information is provided). 1.3 “Open Source Software” means software with either freely obtainable source code, license for modification, or permission for free distribution. 1.4 “Open Source Software License” means the terms or conditions under which the Open Source Software is licensed. 1.5 “Primary Agreement” means the agreement to which this exhibit is attached. 1.6 “Security Vulnerability” means a flaw or weakness in system security procedures, design, implementation, or internal controls that could be exercised (accidentally triggered or intentionally exploited) and result in a security breach such that data is compromised, manipulated or stolen or the system damaged. 1.7 “Software” (i) means proprietary software in object code format, and adaptations, translations, de- compilations, disassemblies, emulations, or derivative works of such software; (ii) means any modifications, enhancements, new versions and new releases of the software provided by Motorola; and (iii) may contain one or more items of software owned by a third party supplier. The term "Software" does not include any third party software provided under separate license or third party software not licensable under the terms of this Agreement. Section 2 SCOPE Motorola and Licensee enter into this Agreement in connection with Motorola's delivery of certain proprietary Software or products containing embedded or pre-loaded proprietary Software, or both. This Agreement contains the terms and conditions of the license Motorola is providing to Licensee, and Licensee’s use of the Software and Documentation. Section 3 GRANT OF LICENSE 3.1. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and the payment of applicable license fees, Motorola grants to Licensee a personal, limited, non-transferable (except as permitted in Section 7) and non- exclusive license under Motorola’s copyrights and Confidential Information (as defined in the Primary Agreement) embodied in the Software to use the Software, in object code form, and the Documentation solely in connection with Licensee's use of the Designated Products. This Agreement does not grant any rights to source code. 3.2. If the Software licensed under this Agreement contains or is derived from Open Source Software, the terms and conditions governing the use of such Open Source Software are in the Open Source Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 14 Software Licenses of the copyright owner and not this Agreement. If there is a conflict between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the terms and conditions of the Open Source Software Licenses governing Licensee’s use of the Open Source Software, the terms and conditions of the license grant of the applicable Open Source Software Licenses will take precedence over the license grants in this Agreement. If requested by Licensee, Motorola will use commercially reasonable efforts to: (i) determine whether any Open Source Software is provided under this Agreement; (ii) identify the Open Source Software and provide Licensee a copy of the applicable Open Source Software License (or specify where that license may be found); and, (iii) provide Licensee a copy of the Open Source Software source code, without charge, if it is publicly available (although distribution fees may be applicable). Section 4 LIMITATIONS ON USE 4.1. Licensee may use the Software only for Licensee's internal business purposes and only in accordance with the Documentation. Any other use of the Software is strictly prohibited. Without limiting the general nature of these restrictions, Licensee will not make the Software available for use by third parties on a "time sharing," "application service provider," or "service bureau" basis or for any other similar commercial rental or sharing arrangement. 4.2. Licensee will not, and will not allow or enable any third party to: (i) reverse engineer, disassemble, peel components, decompile, reprogram or otherwise reduce the Software or any portion to a human perceptible form or otherwise attempt to recreate the source code; (ii) modify, adapt, create derivative works of, or merge the Software; (iii) copy, reproduce, distribute, lend, or lease the Software or Documentation to any third party, grant any sublicense or other rights in the Software or Documentation to any third party, or take any action that would cause the Software or Documentation to be placed in the public domain; (iv) remove, or in any way alter or obscure, any copyright notice or other notice of Motorola's proprietary rights; (v) provide, copy, transmit, disclose, divulge or make the Software or Documentation available to, or permit the use of the Software by any third party or on any machine except as expressly authorized by this Agreement; or (vi) use, or permit the use of, the Software in a manner that would result in the production of a copy of the Software solely by activating a machine containing the Software. Licensee may make one copy of Software to be used solely for archival, back- up, or disaster recovery purposes; provided that Licensee may not operate that copy of the Software at the same time as the original Software is being operated. Licensee may make as many copies of the Documentation as it may reasonably require for the internal use of the Software. 4.3. Unless otherwise authorized by Motorola in writing, Licensee will not, and will not enable or allow any third party to: (i) install a licensed copy of the Software on more than one unit of a Designated Product; or (ii) copy onto or transfer Software installed in one unit of a Designated Product onto one other device. Licensee may temporarily transfer Software installed on a Designated Product to another device if the Designated Product is inoperable or malfunctioning, if Licensee provides written notice to Motorola of the temporary transfer and identifies the device on which the Software is transferred. Temporary transfer of the Software to another device must be discontinued when the original Designated Product is returned to operation and the Software must be removed from the other device. Licensee must provide prompt written notice to Motorola at the time temporary transfer is discontinued. 4.4. When using Motorola's Radio Service Software ("RSS"), Licensee must purchase a separate license for each location at which Licensee uses RSS. Licensee's use of RSS at a licensed location does not entitle Licensee to use or access RSS remotely. Licensee may make one copy of RSS for each licensed location. Licensee shall provide Motorola with a list of all locations at which Licensee uses or intends to use RSS upon Motorola’s request. 4.5. Licensee will maintain, during the term of this Agreement and for a period of two years thereafter, accurate records relating to this license grant to verify compliance with this Agreement. Motorola or an independent third party (“Auditor”) may inspect Licensee’s premises, books and records, upon reasonable prior notice to Licensee, during Licensee’s normal business hours and subject to Licensee's facility and security regulations. Motorola is responsible for the payment of all expenses and costs of the Auditor. Any information obtained by Motorola and the Auditor will be kept in strict confidence by Motorola and the Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 15 Auditor and used solely for the purpose of verifying Licensee's compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Section 5 OWNERSHIP AND TITLE Motorola, its licensors, and its suppliers retain all of their proprietary rights in any form in and to the Software and Documentation, including, but not limited to, all rights in patents, patent applications, inventions, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, trade names, and other proprietary rights in or relating to the Software and Documentation (including any corrections, bug fixes, enhancements, updates, modifications, adaptations, translations, de-compilations, disassemblies, emulations to or derivative works from the Software or Documentation, whether made by Motorola or another party, or any improvements that result from Motorola’s processes or, provision of information services). No rights are granted to Licensee under this Agreement by implication, estoppel or otherwise, except for those rights which are expressly granted to Licensee in this Agreement. All intellectual property developed, originated, or prepared by Motorola in connection with providing the Software, Designated Products, Documentation or related services, remains vested exclusively in Motorola, and Licensee will not have any shared development or other intellectual property rights. Section 6 LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY 6.1. The commencement date and the term of the Software warranty will be a period of ninety (90) days from Motorola's shipment of the Software (the "Warranty Period"). If Licensee is not in breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement, Motorola warrants that the unmodified Software, when used properly and in accordance with the Documentation and this Agreement, will be free from a reproducible defect that eliminates the functionality or successful operation of a feature critical to the primary functionality or successful operation of the Software. Whether a defect occurs will be determined by Motorola solely with reference to the Documentation. Motorola does not warrant that Licensee’s use of the Software or the Designated Products will be uninterrupted, error-free, completely free of Security Vulnerabilities, or that the Software or the Designated Products will meet Licensee’s particular requirements. Motorola makes no representations or warranties with respect to any third party software included in the Software. 6.2 Motorola’s sole obligation to Licensee and Licensee’s exclusive remedy under this warranty is to use reasonable efforts to remedy any material Software defect covered by this warranty. These efforts will involve either replacing the media or attempting to correct significant, demonstrable program or documentation errors or Security Vulnerabilities. If Motorola cannot correct the defect within a reasonable time, then at Motorola’s option, Motorola will replace the defective Software with functionally-equivalent Software, license to Licensee substitute Software which will accomplish the same objective, or terminate the license and refund the Licensee’s paid license fee. 6.3. Warranty claims are described in the Primary Agreement. 6.4. The express warranties set forth in this Section 6 are in lieu of, and Motorola disclaims, any and all other warranties (express or implied, oral or written) with respect to the Software or Documentation, including, without limitation, any and all implied warranties of condition, title, non-infringement, merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose or use by Licensee (whether or not Motorola knows, has reason to know, has been advised, or is otherwise aware of any such purpose or use), whether arising by law, by reason of custom or usage of trade, or by course of dealing. In addition, Motorola disclaims any warranty to any person other than Licensee with respect to the Software or Documentation. Section 7 TRANSFERS Licensee will not transfer the Software or Documentation to any third party without Motorola's prior written consent. Motorola’s consent may be withheld at its discretion and may be conditioned upon transferee paying all applicable license fees and agreeing to be bound by this Agreement. If the Designated Products are Motorola's radio products and Licensee transfers ownership of the Motorola radio products to a third party, Licensee may assign its right to use the Software (other than RSS and Motorola's Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 16 FLASHport® software) which is embedded in or furnished for use with the radio products and the related Documentation; provided that Licensee transfers all copies of the Software and Documentation to the transferee, and Licensee and the transferee sign a transfer form to be provided by Motorola upon request, obligating the transferee to be bound by this Agreement. Section 8 TERM AND TERMINATION 8.1 Licensee’s right to use the Software and Documentation will begin when the Primary Agreement is signed by both parties and will continue for the life of the Designated Products with which or for which the Software and Documentation have been provided by Motorola, unless Licensee breaches this Agreement, in which case this Agreement and Licensee's right to use the Software and Documentation may be terminated immediately upon notice by Motorola. 8.2 Within thirty (30) days after termination of this Agreement, Licensee must certify in writing to Motorola that all copies of the Software have been removed or deleted from the Designated Products and that all copies of the Software and Documentation have been returned to Motorola or destroyed by Licensee and are no longer in use by Licensee. 8.3 Licensee acknowledges that Motorola made a considerable investment of resources in the development, marketing, and distribution of the Software and Documentation and that Licensee's breach of this Agreement will result in irreparable harm to Motorola for which monetary damages would be inadequate. If Licensee breaches this Agreement, Motorola may terminate this Agreement and be entitled to all available remedies at law or in equity (including immediate injunctive relief and repossession of all non-embedded Software and associated Documentation unless Licensee is a Federal agency of the United States Government). Section 9 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT LICENSING PROVISIONS This Section applies if Licensee is the United States Government or a United States Government agency. Licensee’s use, duplication or disclosure of the Software and Documentation under Motorola’s copyrights or trade secret rights is subject to the restrictions set forth in subparagraphs (c)(1) and (2) of the Commercial Computer Software-Restricted Rights clause at FAR 52.227-19 (JUNE 1987), if applicable, unless they are being provided to the Department of Defense. If the Software and Documentation are being provided to the Department of Defense, Licensee’s use, duplication, or disclosure of the Software and Documentation is subject to the restricted rights set forth in subparagraph (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS 252.227-7013 (OCT 1988), if applicable. The Software and Documentation may or may not include a Restricted Rights notice, or other notice referring to this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement will continue to apply, but only to the extent that they are consistent with the rights provided to the Licensee under the provisions of the FAR or DFARS mentioned above, as applicable to the particular procuring agency and procurement transaction. Section 10 CONFIDENTIALITY Licensee acknowledges that the Software and Documentation contain Motorola’s valuable proprietary and Confidential Information and are Motorola’s trade secrets, and that the provisions in the Primary Agreement concerning Confidential Information apply. Section 11 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The Limitation of Liability provision is described in the Primary Agreement. Section 12 NOTICES Notices are described in the Primary Agreement. Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 17 Section 13 GENERAL 13.1. COPYRIGHT NOTICES. The existence of a copyright notice on the Software will not be construed as an admission or presumption of publication of the Software or public disclosure of any trade secrets associated with the Software. 13.2. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. Licensee acknowledges that the Software is subject to the laws and regulations of the United States and Licensee will comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including export laws and regulations of the United States. Licensee will not, without the prior authorization of Motorola and the appropriate governmental authority of the United States, in any form export or re-export, sell or resell, ship or reship, or divert, through direct or indirect means, any item or technical data or direct or indirect products sold or otherwise furnished to any person within any territory for which the United States Government or any of its agencies at the time of the action, requires an export license or other governmental approval. Violation of this provision is a material breach of this Agreement. 13.3. ASSIGNMENTS AND SUBCONTRACTING. Motorola may assign its rights or subcontract its obligations under this Agreement, or encumber or sell its rights in any Software, without prior notice to or consent of Licensee. 13.4. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the United States to the extent that they apply and otherwise by the internal substantive laws of the State to which the Software is shipped if Licensee is a sovereign government entity, or the internal substantive laws of the State of Illinois if Licensee is not a sovereign government entity. The terms of the U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods do not apply. In the event that the Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act, any version of this Act, or a substantially similar law (collectively "UCITA") becomes applicable to a party's performance under this Agreement, UCITA does not govern any aspect of this Agreement or any license granted under this Agreement, or any of the parties' rights or obligations under this Agreement. The governing law will be that in effect prior to the applicability of UCITA. 13.5. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement is entered into solely for the benefit of Motorola and Licensee. No third party has the right to make any claim or assert any right under this Agreement, and no third party is deemed a beneficiary of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any licensor or supplier of third party software included in the Software will be a direct and intended third party beneficiary of this Agreement. 13.6. SURVIVAL. Sections 4, 5, 6.4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13 survive the termination of this Agreement. 13.7. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE. In the event of inconsistencies between this Exhibit and the Primary Agreement, the parties agree that this Exhibit prevails, only with respect to the specific subject matter of this Exhibit, and not the Primary Agreement or any other exhibit as it applies to any other subject matter. 13.8 SECURITY. Motorola uses reasonable means in the design and writing of its own Software and the acquisition of third party Software to limit Security Vulnerabilities. While no software can be guaranteed to be free from Security Vulnerabilities, if a Security Vulnerability is discovered, Motorola will take the steps set forth in Section 6 of this Agreement. Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 18 Exhibit B PAYMENT SCHEDULE Except for a payment that is due on the Effective Date, Customer will make payments to Motorola within thirty (30) days after the date of each invoice. Customer will make payments when due in the form of a check, cashier’s check, or wire transfer drawn on a U.S. financial institution and in accordance with the following milestones. 1.25% of the Contract Price for mobilization due at contract execution (Effective Date); 2.65% of the Contract Price upon shipment of equipment; 3.5% of the Contract Price upon system acceptance or start of beneficial use; and 4.5% of the Contract Price upon Final Acceptance. Overdue invoices will bear simple interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, unless such rate exceeds the maximum allowed by law, in which case it will be reduced to the maximum allowable rate. Motorola reserves the right to make partial shipments of equipment and to request payment upon shipment of such equipment. In addition, Motorola reserves the right to invoice for installations or civil work completed on a site-by-site basis, when applicable. Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 19 Exhibit C TECHNICAL AND IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENTS Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 1 Please see proposal at beginning of document. Exhibit D SERVICE STATEMENT(S) OF WORK and SERVICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS (IF APPLICABLE) Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc 1 Motorola, Inc. Page 1 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 Statement of Work Infrastructure Repair with Advanced Replacement 1.0 Description of Services Infrastructure Repair with Advanced Replacement is a repair service for Motorola and select third party Infrastructure as set forth in the applicable attached Exhibit(s), all of which are hereby incorporated into this Statement of Work (SOW) by this reference. Infrastructure may be repaired down to the Component level, as applicable, at the Motorola Infrastructure Depot Operations (IDO). At Motorola’s discretion, select third party Infrastructure may be sent to the original equipment manufacturer or third party vendor for repair. If Infrastructure is no longer supported by the original equipment manufacturer or third party vendor, Motorola may replace Infrastructure with similar Infrastructure, when possible. When available, Motorola will provide Customer with an Advanced Replacement unit(s) or FRU(s) in exchange for Customer’s malfunctioning FRU(s). Non-standard configurations, Customer-modified Infrastructure and certain third party Infrastructure are excluded from Advanced Replacement service. Malfunctioning FRU (s) will be evaluated and repaired by IDO and returned to IDO FRU inventory upon completion of repair. The terms and conditions of this SOW are an integral part of Motorola's Service Terms and Conditions or other applicable agreement to which it is attached and made a part thereof by this reference. 2.0 Motorola has the following responsibilities: 2.1. Use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain an inventory of FRU. 2.2. Provide new or reconditioned units as FRU to Customer or Servicer, upon request and subject to availability. The FRU will be of similar kit and version, and will contain like boards and chips, as the Customer’s malfunctioning Infrastructure. 2.3. Program FRU to original operating parameters based on templates provided by Customer as required in Section 3.5. If Customer template is not provided or is not reasonably usable, a standard default template will be used. 2.4. Properly package and ship Advanced Replacement FRU from IDO or select third party FRU inventory to Customer specified address. 2.4.1. During normal operating hours of Monday through Friday 7:00am to 7:00pm CST, excluding holidays, FRU will be sent next day air via Federal Express Priority Overnight or UPS Red, unless otherwise requested. Select third party FRU may ship second day air via Federal Express Priority Overnight or UPS red as noted in the attached exhibit(s). Motorola will pay for such shipping, unless Customer requests shipments outside of the above mentioned standard business hours and/or carrier programs, such as NFO (next flight out). In such cases, Customer will be subject to shipping and handling charges. 2.4.2. When sending the Advanced Replacement FRU to Customer, provide a return air bill in order for Customer to return the Customer’s malfunctioning FRU. The Customer’s malfunctioning FRU will become property of IDO or select third party and the Customer will own the Advanced Replacement FRU. 2.4.3. When sending a Loaner FRU to Customer, IDO will not provide a return air bill for the malfunctioning Infrastructure. The Customer is responsible to arrange and pay for shipping the malfunctioning Infrastructure to IDO. IDO will repair and return the Customer’s Infrastructure and will provide a return air bill for the customer to return IDO’s Loaner FRU. 2.5. Provide repair return authorization number upon Customer request for Infrastructure that is not classified as an Advanced Replacement or Loaner FRU. 2.6. Receive malfunctioning Infrastructure from Customer and document its arrival, repair and return. 2.7. Perform the following service on Motorola Infrastructure: 2.7.1. Perform an operational check on the Infrastructure to determine the nature of the problem. Motorola, Inc. Page 2 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 2.7.2. Replace malfunctioning FRU or Components. 2.7.3. Verify that Motorola Infrastructure is returned to Motorola manufactured specifications, as applicable 2.7.4. Perform a Box Unit Test on all serviced Infrastructure. 2.7.5. Perform a System Test on select Infrastructure. 2.8. Provide the following service on select third party Infrastructure: 2.8.1. Perform pre-diagnostic and repair services to confirm Infrastructure malfunction and eliminate sending Infrastructure with no trouble found (NTF) to third party vendor for repair, when applicable. 2.8.2. Ship malfunctioning Infrastructure to the original equipment manufacturer or third party vendor for repair service, when applicable. 2.8.3. Track Infrastructure sent to the original equipment manufacturer or third party vendor for service. 2.8.4. Perform a post-test after repair by Motorola, original equipment manufacturer, or third party vendor to confirm malfunctioning Infrastructure has been repaired and functions properly in a Motorola System configuration, when applicable. 2.9. Re-program repaired Infrastructure to original operating parameters based on templates provided by Customer as required by Section 3.5. If Customer template is not provided or is not reasonably usable, a standard default template will be used. If IDO determines that the malfunctioning Infrastructure is due to a Software defect, IDO reserves the right to reload Infrastructure with a similar Software version. Enhancement Release(s), if needed, are subject to additional charges to be paid by Customer unless the Customer has a Motorola Software Subscription agreement. 2.10. Properly package repaired Infrastructure unless Customer’s malfunctioning FRU was exchanged with an IDO FRU. Motorola will return Customer’s FRU(s) to IDO’s FRU inventory, upon completion of repair. 2.11. Ship repaired Infrastructure to the Customer specified address during normal operating hours set forth in 2.4.1. FRU will be sent two-day air unless otherwise requested. Motorola will pay for such shipping, unless Customer requests shipments outside of the above mentioned standard business hours and/or carrier programs, such as NFO (next flight out). In such cases, Customer will be subject to shipping and handling charges. 3.0 Customer has the following responsibilities: 3.1. Contact or instruct Servicer to contact the Motorola System Support Center (SSC) and request an Advanced Replacement, or Loaner FRU and a return authorization number (necessary for all non- Advanced Replacement repairs) prior to shipping malfunctioning Infrastructure or third party Infrastructure named in the applicable attached Exhibit. 3.1.1. Provide model description, model number, serial number, type of System and Firmware version, symptom of problem and address of site location for FRU or Infrastructure. 3.1.2. Indicate if Infrastructure or third party Infrastructure being sent in for service was subjected to physical damage or lightning damage. 3.1.3. Follow Motorola instructions regarding inclusion or removal of Firmware and Software applications from Infrastructure being sent in for service. 3.1.4. Provide Customer purchase order number to secure payment for any costs described herein. 3.2 Pay for shipping of Advanced Replacement or Loaner FRU from IDO if Customer requested shipping outside of standard business hours or carrier programs set forth in section 2.4.1. 3.3 Within five (5) days of receipt of the Advanced Replacement FRU from IDO’s FRU inventory, properly package Customer’s malfunctioning Infrastructure and ship the malfunctioning Infrastructure to IDO for evaluation and repair as set forth in 2.7. Customer must send the return air bill, referenced in 2.4.2 above back to IDO in order to ensure proper tracking of the returned Infrastructure. Customer will be subject to a replacement fee for malfunctioning Infrastructure not properly returned. For Infrastructure and/or third party Infrastructure repairs that are not exchanged in advance, properly package Infrastructure and ship the malfunctioning FRU, at Customer’s expense and risk of loss to Motorola. Customer is responsible for properly packaging the Customer malfunctioning Infrastructure FRU to ensure that the shipped Infrastructure arrives un-damaged and in repairable condition. Clearly print the return authorization number on the outside of the packaging. Motorola, Inc. Page 3 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 3.4 If received, Customer must properly package and ship Loaner FRU back to IDO within five (5) days of receipt of Customer’s repaired FRU. 3.5 Maintain templates of Software/applications and Firmware for reloading of Infrastructure as set forth in paragraph 2.3 and 2.9. 3.6 For Digital In-Car Video Infrastructure, remove video from equipment prior to sending Infrastructure in for repair. Video retrieval is a separate service and is not included as part of this SOW. Additional services and fee applies. 3.7 Cooperate with Motorola and perform all acts that are reasonable or necessary to enable Motorola to provide the Infrastructure Repair with Advanced Replacement services to Customer. 4.0 In addition to any exclusions named in Section 5 of the Service Terms and Conditions or in any other underlying Agreement to which this SOW is attached, the following items are excluded from Infrastructure Repair with Advanced Replacement: 1. All Infrastructure over seven (7) years from product cancellation date. 2. All Broadband/WiNS Infrastructure three (3) years from product cancellation date. 3. Physically damaged Infrastructure. 4. Third party Equipment not shipped by Motorola. 5. Consumable items including, but not limited to, batteries, connectors, cables, tone/ink cartridges. 6. Video retrieval from Digital In-Car Video equipment. 7. Test equipment. 8. Racks, furniture and cabinets. 9. Firmware and/or Software upgrades. Motorola, Inc. Page 4 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 ASTRO® 25 Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Antenna Systems Excludes all Equipment such as bi-directional amplifiers, multicouplers, combiners, tower top pre- amplifiers, antennas, cables, towers, tower lighting, and transmission lines Backhaul Includes PTP (Point-to-Point Wireless) PTP 49600 and PTP 800 licensed series Excludes all other PTP technologies Base Station(s) and Repeater(s) Includes Quantar, MTR3000, STR3000, GTR8000, GTR8000 HPD, IntelliRepeater, Network Management (Please refer to the SOW for details) is not available on all stations. Quantar high power booster power amplifier, power supply and control board Excludes Fan Modules, Dual Circulator Tray, Site RMC Tray Central Electronics Bank(s) Includes Logging Recorder Interface and Network Hub Excludes all other technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Channel Bank(s) Includes Premisys , Telco, IMACS models 600, 800 . Excludes Siemens Comparator(s) Includes Spectratac, Digitac, and ASTRO-tac 9600, ASTRO-tac 3000, GMC8000, Comparators. Computer(s)/Workstations/Modems Includes computers (Pentium I, II, III, IV) directly interface with or control the communications System, including Systemwatch II, PT800 tablet HP x1100, HPx2100, HP xw4000-4600, HPz400, HP VL600, HP VL800, HPz400, ML850 laptop, MW810, ML900 laptop, ML910 laptop, Compaq XW4000. Includes keyboards, mice, trackballs. Excludes all other laptop and desktop computer technologies and all 286, 386, 486 computers; defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel display image retention, Console(s) Includes Centracom Gold Elite, MCC7500, MCC5500, MIP5000, VPM, as part of complete communication System – including headset jacks, dual footswitches, and gooseneck microphones. Excludes cables Controller - trunking Includes SmartNet II prime and remote controllers, MTC3600, GCP8000, Site Controller PSC9600, CSC7000, MTC9600, MZC3600, MZC5000 (Includes Netra240 & T5220). Excludes SSMT and SCMS controllers. CD ROM Drive, Fan Tray Dictaphones and Recording Equipment Excludes all types and models. Digital Interface Unit(s) Included Digital Signaling Modem(s) Included upon modem model availability Digital Voice Modem(s) Included upon modem model availability Embassy Switch Includes AEB, AIMI, ZAMBI, AMB Firewalls Includes Nortel Alteon ASF5105, 5106, Juniper SS520, ISSG140, SSG5, ISG1000C, ISG2000 Intrusion Detector Includes Proventia 201 Linux IDSS, Proventia CX4002C ISSI Gateway Includes T5220 Sun server Solaris 10 OS Links Includes PTP 49600 and 800 licensed series Logging Recorder Excludes all technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Management Terminals Includes computers (Pentium I, II, III, IV) that directly interface with or control the communications System, including Systemwatch II. Excludes laptop computers and all 286, 386, 486 computers. MBEX(s) or NOVA Interconnect Included Microwave Equipment. Excluded from service agreement but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All Equipment must be shipped to IDO. Excludes any on-site services. Monitor(s) Includes all Motorola certified monitors connected to computers that directly interface with or control the communications System. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel displays image retention, as well as monitors that were not shipped by Motorola and/or cannot be confirmed by a Motorola factory order number. Motobridge Included Moscad Includes NFM (Network Fault Management), as part of communication System only, RTU, SDM Site Manager RTU. Standalone MOSCAD and System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) must be quoted separately. Includes FSA4000. Excludes all other fire alarming systems. Motorola, Inc. Page 5 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 ASTRO 25 Infrastructure Repair cont. Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Network Fault Management Includes Full Vision, Unified Event Manager Excludes NMC Gateway Includes PDG:CPX8216, IVD & HPD PDG on HP DL360, MOTOBRIDGE Printer(s) Includes printers that directly interface with the communications system. RAS(s) Excludes RAS 1100, 1101 and 1102 Receiver(s) Includes Quantar, MTR2000 and ASTRO-TAC, GPW8000, GTR8000, GTR8000 HPD Receivers. Excludes Fan Modules, Dual Circulator Tray, Site RMC Tray Routers Includes GGM8000, ST5500, ST5598, S2500-S6000 Servers Includes Netra 240, Netra T5220, cPCI, HP DL360, HP ML370, HP ML110, HP ML530, HP TC2110, 2120 HP InfoVista Server. IR8000 series, LX4000 series, Intel Server TSRL-T2, TIGPR2U, Proventia 201 Linux IDSS, Proventia GX4002C,Trak9100. Network Management Server includes cPCI Chassis, Power Supply, Fan Tray, Controller Hard Drive, CD ROM Drive, Tape Drive, CPU, Client PC’s, Core Security Management Server, Firewall Servers, Intrusion Detection Sensor Server. Excludes Dell Servers, Monitors, Memory Module 0182915Y02, Rear Fan RLN5352, Central Process Card 0182915Y01 Simulcast Distribution Amplifier(s) Included Site Frequency Standard(s) Includes Rubidium, GPS and Netclocks systems sold with the Motorola System. Secure Includes KMF crypto card, end to end Cryptor for IVD PDEG Cryptr SMARTX Includes VPM Switch Includes Nortel Passport PBX,Cisco Catalyst 6509, HP 5308 LAN switch, HP ProCurve Switch 2524, 2650, 2626, HP3500, HP2610, 3Com PS40, SS1100 Telco PBX Includes Avaya Difinity PBX, S8300, S8500, Intel Server (ACSS), TSRLT2, TIGPR2U Terminal Servers Includes IR8000, LX4000S, LX4000T, Paradyne Universal Simulcast Controller Interface(s) Included UPS Systems Excluded from service agreements but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All UPS Systems must be shipped to IDO for repair. Excludes batteries and any on-site services. Workstation Included Motorola, Inc. Page 6 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 SmartZone System Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Antenna Systems Excludes all Equipment such as bi-directional amplifiers, multicouplers, combiners, tower top pre- amplifiers, antennas, cables, towers, tower lighting, and transmission lines. Base Station(s) and Repeater(s) Includes: Quantar, Quantro, Digital, MTR2000 ONLY. Central Electronics Bank(s) Includes Logging Recorder, Interface and Network Hub Excludes all other technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Channel Bank(s) Includes Premisys and Telco Excludes Siemens Comparator(s) Includes Spectratac, Digitac, and ASTRO-tac Comparators Computer(s) Includes computers (Pentium I, II, III, IV) that directly interface with or control the communications System, including Systemwatch II, keyboards, mice and trackballs. Excludes laptop computers and all 286, 386, 486 computers, defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel display image retention. Console(s) Includes Centracom Gold Elite, MCC7500, MCC5500, MIP5000 as part of complete communication System – including headset jacks, dual footswitches, and gooseneck microphones. Excludes cables Controller(s) -Trunking Includes SmartNet II prime and remote controllers. Excludes SSMT and SCMS controllers. Dictaphones, Logging Recorders and Recording Equipment Excludes all technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Digital Interface Unit(s) Included Digital Signaling Modem(s) Included upon modem model availability Digital Voice Modem(s) Included upon modem model availability Embassy Switch Includes AEB, AIMI, ZAMBI, AMB Management Terminals Includes computers (Pentium I, II, III, IV) that directly interface with or control the communications System, including Systemwatch II. Excludes laptop computers and all 286, 386, 486 computers. MBEX(s) or NOVA Interconnect Included Microwave Equipment. Excluded from service agreement but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All Equipment must be shipped to IDO. Excludes any on-site services. Monitor(s) Includes all Motorola certified monitors connected to computers that directly interface with or control the communications System. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel displays image retention as well as monitors that were not shipped by Motorola and/or cannot be confirmed by a Motorola factory order number. Moscad Includes NFM (Network Fault Management), as part of communication System only. Standalone MOSCAD and System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) must be quoted separately. Includes FSA4000. Excludes all other fire alarming systems. Motobridge Included Network Fault Management Includes Full Vision Excludes NMC Printer(s) Includes printers that directly interface with the communications System. RAS(s) Excludes RAS 1100, 1101 and 1102 Receiver(s) Includes Quantar and MTR2000, ASTRO-TAC Receivers Simulcast Distribution Amplifier(s) Included Site Frequency Standard(s) Includes Rubidium, GPS and Netclocks systems sold with the Motorola System. Excludes MFS -Rubidium Standard Network Time and Frequency devices Universal Simulcast Controller Interface(s) Included UPS Systems. Excluded from service agreements but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All UPS Systems must be shipped to IDO for repair. Excludes batteries and any on-site services. Motorola, Inc. Page 7 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 SmartZone System Infrastructure cont. Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Zone Manager Excludes HP715/33, HP 715/50 servers. Excludes x-terminals NDS14C and NDS17C Zone Controller(s) Includes console terminals. Excludes all Sun/IMP hard drives except TLN3495A 0820 1 GB drive as well as the following SUN/IMP CPUSET’s: TLN3278B 0406, TLN3343A 0424 and TLN3278A 0181/0389. Motorola, Inc. Page 8 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 SmartNet System Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Antenna Systems Excludes all Equipment such as bi-directional amplifiers, multicouplers, combiners, tower top pre-amplifiers, antennas, cables, towers, tower lighting, and transmission lines Base Station(s) and Repeater(s) Includes Quantar, Quantro, Digital MSF5000, MTR2000, and Desktrac L35SUM7000-T Repeaters ONLY. Network Management (please refer to the SOW for details) is not available on all stations. Central Electronics Bank(s) Includes Logging Recorder Interface and Network Hub Excludes all other technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Channel Bank(s) Includes Premisys and Telco. Excludes Siemens Comparator(s) Includes Spectratac, Digitac, and ASTRO-tac Comparators. Computer(s) Includes computers (Pentium I, II, III, IV) directly interface with or control the communications System, including Systemwatch II, keyboards, mice and trackballs, Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel display image retention. Console(s) Includes Centracom Gold Elite, MCC7500, MCC5500, MIP5000 as part of complete communication System – including headset jacks, dual footswitches, and gooseneck microphones. Excludes cables Controller - trunking Includes SmartNet II prime and remote controllers. Excludes SSMT and SCMS controllers. Dictaphones, Logging Recorders and Recording Equipment Excludes all technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Digital Interface Unit(s) Included Digital Signaling Modem(s) Included upon modem model availability Digital Voice Modem(s) Included upon modem model availability Embassy Switch Includes AEB, AIMI, ZAMBI, AMB Management Terminals Includes computers (Pentium I, II, III, IV) directly interface with or control the communications System, including Systemwatch II. Excludes laptop computers and all 286, 386, 486 computers. MBEX(s) or NOVA Interconnect Included Microwave Equipment. Excluded from service agreement but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All Equipment must be shipped to IDO. Excludes any on-site services. Monitor(s) Includes all Motorola certified monitors connected to computers that directly interface with or control the communications System. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel displays image retention as well as monitors not shipped by Motorola and/or cannot be confirmed by a Motorola factory order number. Moscad INFM (Network Fault Management), as part of communication System only. Standalone MOSCAD and System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) must be quoted separately. Includes FSA4000. Excludes all other fire alarming systems. Motobridge Included Network Fault Management Includes Full Vision. Excludes NMC Printer(s) Includes printers that directly interface with the communications System. RAS(s) Excludes RAS 1100, 1101 and 1102 Receiver(s) Includes Quantar, MTR2000 and ASTRO-TAC Receivers. Motorola, Inc. Page 9 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 SmartNet System Infrastructure cont. Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Simulcast Distribution Amplifier(s) Included Site Frequency Standard(s) Includes Rubidium, GPS and Netclocks systems sold with the Motorola System. Excludes MFS -Rubidium Standard Network Time and Frequency devices Universal Simulcast Controller Interface(s) Included UPS Systems. Excluded from service agreements but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All UPS Systems must be shipped to IDO for repair. Excludes batteries and any on-site services. Motorola, Inc. Page 10 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 Broadband Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Access Points Includes PMP (Canopy), Motomesh Duo, Motomesh Quattro, Meshcam, Motomesh Solo, Motomesh AP7181 intelligent access points. Excludes all other technologies Backhaul Includes PMP (Canopy) and PTP (Point-to-Point Wireless) PTP 49600 and 800 licensed series Excludes all other technologies Cables, connectors and testers Excluded Cameras Includes Meshcam Excludes all other technologies, fixed black & white, color, pan tilt zoom analog, pan tilt zoom IP, fixed hybrid (IP and Analog) cameras Cluster Management Modules (CMM) Includes PMP (Canopy). Excludes all other technologies Digital Video Recorder Includes Mobile Video Enforcer Excludes all other technologies Docking Station Includes Mobile Video Enforcer Excludes all other technologies GPS Synch Box Excluded Links Includes PTP 49600 and 800 licensed series Mobile Internet Switching Controller(MISC) Excluded Modems Includes Mobile Video Enforcer Excludes all other technologies Monitors Includes Mesh,MotoMesh Excludes all other technologies Mounting Bracket Excluded Multiplexers Excluded Network Interface Card Excludes RAD data multiplexers Network Switches Includes Mesh, MotoMesh, Meshcam Excludes all other technologies Networking Enablers Included Personal Tracking Device Excludes Asymmetric DSL Broadband Gateway, Asymmetric Customer Premise Equipment, Symmetric DSL Broadband Gateway, Symmetric DSL-CPE’s and accessories Power Supply Includes MeshTrack Excludes all other technologies Reflector Hardware Kit Included Server Excluded Software Included HP DL360, Mobile Video Enforcer system server Excludes all other technologies Subscriber Modules Excluded Surge Suppressor/LPU Includes, PMP (Canopy) Excludes all other technologies UPS Excluded Video Recording System Excluded from service agreements but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All UPS Systems must be shipped to IDO for repair. Excludes batteries and any one-site services. Wireless Router AC and DC Input Includes Mobile Video Enforcer Excludes all other technologies Motorola, Inc. Page 11 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 Conventional System Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Antenna Systems Excludes all Equipment such as bi-directional amplifiers, multicouplers, combiners, tower top pre-amplifiers, antennas, cables, towers, tower lighting, and transmission lines Base Station(s) and Repeater(s) Quantar, Quantro, MTR2000, MTR3000, GTR8000 including IPCCGW. Excludes MICOR and MSF5000 Central Electronics Bank(s) Includes logging recorder interface and network hub Excludes all other technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Channel Bank(s) Includes Premisys and Telco. Excludes Siemens Comparator(s) Includes Spectratac, Digitac, ASTRO-tac, GMC8000. Computer(s) Includes computers (Pentium I, II, III, IV) directly interface with or control the communications System, including Systemwatch II, keyboards, mice and trackballs. Excludes laptop computers and all 286, 386, 486 computers. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel display image retention. Console(s) Includes Centracom Gold Elite, MCC7500, MCC5500, MIP5000 as part of complete communication System – including headset jacks, dual footswitches, and gooseneck microphones. Excludes cables and Commandstar mother board CDN6271. Commandstar and Commandstar Lite are also excluded as a conventional system operator position but can be covered when services are purchased separately. Dictaphones, Logging Recorders and Recording Equipment Excludes all technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Digital Interface Unit(s) (DIU) Included Digital Signaling Modem(s) Included upon modem model availability Embassy Switch Includes AEB, AIMI, ZAMBI, AMB Microwave Equipment. Excluded from service agreement but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All equipment must be shipped to IDO. Excludes any on-site services. Monitor(s) Includes all Motorola certified monitors connected to computers that directly interface with or control the communications System. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel displays image retention as well as monitors not shipped by Motorola and/or cannot be confirmed by a Motorola factory order number. Moscad Includes NFM (Network Fault Management), as part of communication System only. Standalone MOSCAD and System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) must be quoted separately. Includes FSA4000 Excludes all other fire alarming systems. Motobridge Included Printer(s) Includes printers that directly interface with the communications System. Receiver(s) Includes Quantar , MTR2000, ASTRO-TAC, GPW8000 receivers. Simulcast Distribution Amplifier(s) Included Site Frequency Standard(s) Includes Rubidium, GPS and Netclocks systems sold with the Motorola System. Excludes MFS -Rubidium Standard Network Time and Frequency devices Universal Simulcast Controller Interface(s) Included UPS Systems. Excluded from service agreements but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All UPS Systems must be shipped to IDO for repair. Excludes batteries and any on-site services. Motorola, Inc. Page 12 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 Data System Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Base Station(s) and Repeater(s) Includes Quantar (DSS3, DBS), GTR8000. Computer(s) Includes computers (Pentium I, II, III, IV) that directly interface with or control the communications System. Includes keyboards, mice and trackballs. Excludes laptop computers and all 286, 386, 486 computers. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel display image retention. Dictaphones , Logging Recorders and Recording Equipment Excludes all technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Microwave Equipment. Excluded from service agreement but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All equipment must be shipped to IDO. Excludes any on-site services. Monitor(s) Includes all Motorola certified monitors connected to computers that directly interface with or control the communications System. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel displays image retention as well as monitors not shipped by Motorola and/or cannot be confirmed by a Motorola factory order number. Printer(s) Includes printers that directly interface with the communications System. Radio Network Controller Includes One (1) RNC and One (1) RNC Console. Redundant RNC’s must be quoted separately. Excludes RNC1000, NCP500, NCP2000, NCP2500 and NCP3000. Site Data Link Modem(s) Included UPS Systems. Excluded from service agreements but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All UPS Systems must be shipped to IDO for repair. Excludes batteries and any on-site services. Wireless Network Gateway Excluded from the prime/remote site or system agreement but can be covered when services are purchased separately. Motorola, Inc. Page 13 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 Cassidian Communications Infrastructure Repair w Advanced Replacement Vesta Pallas, Vesta Standard (Maars/ComCentrex), Vesta Meridian and Sentinel Patriot Systems Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes ACU (Auto Control Unit) Includes Vesta systems only Excludes Sentinel Patriot ARU (Alarm Reporting Unit) Included ALI (Automatic Location Identification) Controller Includes Analog Station Card(s), Called ID Board(s), Conference Board(s), DTMF Tone Receiver Board(s), Digital Station Card(s), E&M Card(s), Ground Loop Start Card(s), MF Receiver Board(s), 911 Line Card(s) ANI (Asynchronous Network Interface) Controller Included BCM (Business Communication Manager) Includes Vesta Pallas only Excludes all other technologies Cable(s) Excluded CIM (Console Interface Module) Includes Sentinel Patriot Excludes all other technologies CRU (Call Record Unit) Included CIU (CAD Interface Unit) Included Computer(s)/Workstation Includes computers sourced by Cassidian Communications and sold by Motorola that directly interface with or control the Cassidian Communications Systems, monitor, sound card, keyboards, mice and trackballs. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes (CRT) and burned-in flat panel display image retention. Controllers Includes Vesta Standard Excludes all other technologies DBU (Data Base Unit) Includes Vesta Standard Excludes all other technologies Digital Logging Recorders, Logging Recorders and Recording Equipment Includes Pyxis, Cassidian Communications sourced and sold by Motorola Excludes all other technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Herbie Includes Vesta systems only Excludes Sentinel Patriot Line Boosters/Amplifier/Short haul modems Excluded Modified Network LAN Switch Includes Modem(s) Includes ALI modem sources and sold by Motorola Excludes all other technologies Monitor(s) Includes all Motorola certified monitors connected to computers that directly interface with or control the communications Systems. Excludes Non-Certified monitors, defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes (CRT), flat panel monitors with burned in image retention and monitors not shipped by Motorola and/or cannot be confirmed by a Motorola factory order number. MTU (Multi-line Trunk Unit) Includes Vesta Pallas only Excludes All other technologies Printer(s) Includes Cassidian Communications sourced and sold by Motorola that directly interface with the communications System Power Supplies, PSU (Power Supply Unit) Includes Vesta Pallas, Vesta Standard Excludes all other technologies RMU (Remote Maintenance Unit) Includes Vesta Standard only Excludes all other technologies Ring Generator(s) Included Routers Included RIS (Radio Interface Subset) Included (note, only works with the Herbie) Server(s) ALI Includes Vesta servers, Sentinel Patriot Excludes all other technologies Telephone(s) Includes 911 and KEM administrator telephone sourced with the 911 System and sold by Motorola. Excludes Nortel (Avaya) telephone sets TIU (Trunk Interface Unit Includes Vesta Standard Excludes all other technologies Motorola, Inc. Page 14 of 16 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A.\ Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Version 2.0 5/16/13 Console Only Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Card Cages Included Central Electronics Bank(s) (CEB) Includes Logging Recorder Interface and Network Hub, Base Interface Module (BIM), Console Operator Interface Module (COIM), Operator Interface Module (OMI). Excludes all other technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Central Electronic Shelf (CES) Included Computer(s) Includes computers that directly interface with CEB. Includes keyboards, mice and trackballs. Excludes laptop computers and all 286, 386, 486 computers. Defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel display image retention. Console(s) Includes consoles (CommandSTAR, CommandSTAR lite, Centracom Gold Elite MCC7500, MCC7500 w/ VPM, MCC5500, MIP5000, MC1000, MC2000, MC2500, MC3000) as part of complete communication System – Including headset jacks, dual footswitches, and gooseneck microphones and Console Interface Electronics. Excludes cables Console Audio Box (CAB) Included Dictaphones, Logging Recorders and Recording Equipment Excludes all technologies see SOW specifically for NICE logging recorders Junction Box Included Microwave Equipment. Excluded from service agreement but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All Equipment must be shipped to IDO. Excludes any on-site services. Monitor(s) Includes all Motorola certified monitors connected to computers that directly interface with or control the communications System. Excludes defective or phosphor-burned cathode ray tubes CRT(s) and burned-in flat panel displays image retention as well as monitors not shipped by Motorola and/or cannot be confirmed by a Motorola factory order number. Site Frequency Standard(s) Includes Netclocks systems Excludes MFS -Rubidium Standard Network Time and Frequency devices UPS Systems. Excluded from service agreements but may be repaired on an above contract, time and material basis. All UPS Systems must be shipped to IDO for repair. Excludes batteries and any on-site services. Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Page 15 of 16 Motorola, Inc. 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A. Version 2.0 5/16/13 Digital In-Car Video Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes Cables, connectors and testers Excluded Cameras Includes 22X Front Camera. Excludes rear cameras Data Talker Wireless Transmitters Excluded Digital Video Recorder Includes Base unit running DP-2 software Data Storage Module Included LCD Monitor Includes DP-1 &DP-2 versions only Video Retrieval It is the customer’s responsibility to remove the video before sending the DSM into the Motorola Repair Depot for repair. Video retrieval is a separate service and is excluded from this SOW. Approved by Contract and Compliance 11/20/09 Page 16 of 16 Motorola, Inc. 1303 E. Algonquin Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196 U.S.A. Version 2.0 5/16/13 MOTOTRBO Infrastructure Exhibit Inclusions, Exclusions, Exceptions and Notes XRC9000 Controller Included TT2213* single site; TT2215* multi site *Next day (24 hour) delivery if request is received before 1:00 p.m. CST; Second day (48 hour) delivery if request is received after 1:00 p.m. CST MTR3000 Includes T3000 MIP5000 MOTOTRBO Gateway Includes L3598 XRT9000 Gateway Includes TT2386A OnSite Infrastructure Response With Local Dispatch Approved by Motorola Contracts & Compliance: 8/10/11 Page 1 of 2 Statement of Work OnSite Infrastructure Response With Local Dispatch 1.0 Description of Service OnSite Infrastructure Response provides for on-site technician Response by a Servicer. A Servicer will respond to the Customer location based on pre-defined Severity Levels set forth in the Severity Definitions Table and Response times set forth in the Response Time Table in order to Restore the System. The terms and conditions of this Statement of Work (SOW) are an integral part of Motorola's Service Terms and Conditions or other applicable Agreement to which it is attached and made a part thereof by this reference. 2.0 Motorola Servicer has the following responsibilities: 2.1 Continuously receive service requests. 2.2 Assign and dispatch technical resources and provide estimated time of arrival (ETA) to Customer. 2.3 Servicer will perform the following on-site: 2.3.1 Run diagnostics on the Infrastructure or FRU. 2.3.2 Replace defective Infrastructure or FRU, as applicable. Customer, Servicer or Motorola may provide Infrastructure or FRU. 2.3.3 Provide materials, tools, documentation, physical planning manuals, diagnostic/test equipme nt and any other requirements necessary to perform the Maintenance service. 2.3.4 If a third party Vendor is needed to Restore the System, the Servicer may accompany that Vendor onto the Customer’s premises. 2.4 Verify with Customer that Restoration is complete or System is functional. If Customer cannot be contacted within twenty (20) minutes of Restoration, the Servicer will leave the Customer site. 2.5 Provide the service ticket document to Customer, when requested. Service ticket document should include the following: 2.5.1 Resolution action. 2.5.2 Provide defective FRU or part number (model #) used. 3.0 Customer has the following responsibilities: 3.1 Contact Servicer, as necessary, to request service Continuously. 3.2 Allow Servicers access to Equipment. 3.3 Supply Infrastructure or FRU as needed in order for Motorola to Restore the System as set forth in paragraph 2.3.2. 3.4 Maintain and store in an easily accessible location any and all Software needed to Restore the System. 3.5 Maintain and store in an easily accessible location proper Syste m backups. 3.6 For E911 systems, test the secondary/backup PSAP connection to be prepared in the event of a catastrophic failure of a system. Train appropriate personnel on the procedures to perform the function of switching to the backup PSAP. 3.7 Contact the Servicer upon expiration of Response time goal. 3.8 Upon being contacted by the Servicer requesting Verification of a Restoration as described above in Section 2.4, respond to that request within twenty (20) minutes. 3.9 Cooperate with Motorola and perform all acts that are reasonable or necessary to enable Motorola to provide this service to Customer. OnSite Infrastructure Response With Local Dispatch Approved by Motorola Contracts & Compliance: 8/10/11 Page 2 of 2 Severity Definitions Table Severity Level Problem Types Severity 1 Response is provided Continuously Major System failure 33% of System down 33% of Site channels down This level is meant to represent a major issue that results in an unusable system, sub-system, Product, or critical features from the Customer’s perspective. No Work-around or immediate solution is available. Severity 2 Response during Standard Business Day Significant System Impairment not to exceed 33% of system down System problems presently being monitored This level is meant to represent a moderate issue that limits a Customer's normal use of the system, sub-system, product, or major non-critical features from a Customer’s perspective Severity 3 Response during Standard Business Day Intermittent system issues Information questions Upgrades/preventative maintenance This level is meant to represent a minor issue that does not preclude use of the system, sub-system, product, or critical features from a Customer's perspective. It may also represent a cosmetic issue, including documentation errors, general usage questions, recommendations for product enhancements or modifications, and scheduled events such as preventative maintenance or product/system upgrades. Response Time Table (Customer’s Response Time Classification is designated in the Service Agreement) Severity Level Regular Response Time Premier Response Time Limited Response Time Severity 1 Within 4 hours from receipt of Notification Continuously Within 2 hours from receipt of Notification Continuously Within 4 hours from receipt of Notification Standard Business Day Severity 2 Within 4 hours from receipt of Notification Standard Business Day Within 4 hours from receipt of Notification Standard Business Day Within 4 hours from receipt of Notification Standard Business Day Severity 3 Within 24 hours from receipt of Notification Standard Business Day Within 24 hours from receipt of Notification Standard Business Day Within 24 hours from receipt of Notification Standard Business Day August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN Service Terms and Conditions Motorola Solutions, Inc. (“Motorola”) and the customer named in this Agreement (“Customer”) hereby agree as follows: Section 1 APPLICABILITY These Service Terms and Conditions apply to service contracts whereby Motorola will provide to Customer either (1) maintenance, support, or other services under a Motorola Service Agreement, or (2) installation services under a Motorola Installation Agreement. Section 2 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 2.1. “Agreement” means these Service Terms and Conditions; the cover page for the Service Agreement or the Installation Agreement, as applicable; and any other attachments, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference. In interpreting this Agreement and resolving any ambiguities, these Service Terms and Conditions take precedence over any cover page, and the cover page takes precedence over any attachments, unless the cover page or attachment states otherwise. 2.2. “Equipment” means the equipment that is specified in the attachments or is subsequently added to this Agreement. 2.3. “Services” means those installation, maintenance, support, training, and other services described in this Agreement. Section 3 ACCEPTANCE Customer accepts these Service Terms and Conditions and agrees to pay the prices set forth in the Agreement. This Agreement becomes binding only when accepted in writing by Motorola. The term of this Agreement begins on the “Start Date” indicated in this Agreement. Section 4 SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1. Motorola will provide the Services described in this Agreement or in a more detailed statement of work or other document attached to this Agreement. At Customer's request, Motorola may also provide additional services at Motorola's then-applicable rates for the services. 4.2. If Motorola is providing Services for Equipment, Motorola parts or parts of equal quality will be used; the Equipment will be serviced at levels set forth in the manufacturer's product manuals; and routine service procedures that are prescribed by Motorola will be followed. 4.3. If Customer purchases from Motorola additional equipment that becomes part of the same system as the initial Equipment, the additional equipment may be added to this Agreement and will be billed at the applicable rates after the warranty for that additional equipment expires. 4.4. All Equipment must be in good working order on the Start Date or when additional equipment is added to the Agreement. Upon reasonable request by Motorola, Customer will provide a complete serial and model number list of the Equipment. Customer must promptly notify Motorola in writing when any Equipment is lost, damaged, stolen or taken out of service. Customer's obligation to pay Service fees for this Equipment will terminate at the end of the month in which Motorola receives the written notice. 4.5. Customer must specifically identify any Equipment that is labeled intrinsically safe for use in hazardous environments. August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN 4.6. If Equipment cannot, in Motorola's reasonable opinion, be properly or economically serviced for any reason, Motorola may modify the scope of Services related to that Equipment; remove that Equipment from the Agreement; or increase the price to Service that Equipment. 4.7. Customer must promptly notify Motorola of any Equipment failure. Motorola will respond to Customer's notification in a manner consistent with the level of Service purchased as indicated in this Agreement. Section 5 EXCLUDED SERVICES 5.1. Service excludes the repair or replacement of Equipment that has become defective or damaged from use in other than the normal, customary, intended, and authorized manner; use not in compliance with applicable industry standards; excessive wear and tear; or accident, liquids, power surges, neglect, acts of God or other force majeure events. 5.2. Unless specifically included in this Agreement, Service excludes items that are consumed in the normal operation of the Equipment, such as batteries or magnetic tapes.; upgrading or reprogramming Equipment; accessories, belt clips, battery chargers, custom or special products, modified units, or software; and repair or maintenance of any transmission line, antenna, microwave equipment, tower or tower lighting, duplexer, combiner, or multicoupler. Motorola has no obligations for any transmission medium, such as telephone lines, computer networks, the internet or the worldwide web, or for Equipment malfunction caused by the transmission medium. Section 6 TIME AND PLACE OF SERVICE Service will be provided at the location specified in this Agreement. When Motorola performs service at Customer's location, Customer will provide Motorola, at no charge, a non-hazardous work environment with adequate shelter, heat, light, and power and with full and free access to the Equipment. Waivers of liability from Motorola or its subcontractors will not be imposed as a site access requirement. Customer will provide all information pertaining to the hardware and software elements of any system with which the Equipment is interfacing so that Motorola may perform its Services. Unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, the hours of Service will be 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., local time, excluding weekends and holidays. Unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, the price for the Services exclude any charges or expenses associated with helicopter or other unusual access requirements; if these charges or expenses are reasonably incurred by Motorola in rendering the Services, Customer agrees to reimburse Motorola for those charges and expenses. Section 7 CUSTOMER Contact Customer will provide Motorola with designated points of contact (list of names and phone numbers) that will be available twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week, and an escalation procedure to enable Customer's personnel to maintain contact, as needed, with Motorola. Section 8 PAYMENT Unless alternative payment terms are stated in this Agreement, Motorola will invoice Customer in advance for each payment period. All other charges will be billed monthly, and Customer must pay each invoice in U.S. dollars within twenty (20) days of the invoice date. Customer will reimburse Motorola for all property taxes, sales and use taxes, excise taxes, and other taxes or assessments that are levied as a result of Services rendered under this Agreement (except income, profit, and franchise taxes of Motorola) by any governmental entity. Section 9 WARRANTY Motorola warrants that its Services under this Agreement will be free of defects in materials and workmanship for a period of ninety (90) days from the date the performance of the Services are completed. In the event of a breach of this warranty, Customer's sole remedy is to require Motorola to re-perform the non-conforming Service or to refund, on a pro-rata basis, the fees paid for the non-conforming Service. MOTOROLA DISCLAIMS ALL August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Section 10 DEFAULT/TERMINATION 10.1. If either party defaults in the performance of this Agreement, the other party will give to the non- performing party a written and detailed notice of the default. The non-performing party will have thirty (30) days thereafter to provide a written plan to cure the default that is acceptable to the other party and begin implementing the cure plan immediately after plan approval. If the non-performing party fails to provide or implement the cure plan, then the injured party, in addition to any other rights available to it under law, may immediately terminate this Agreement effective upon giving a written notice of termination to the defaulting party. 10.2. Any termination of this Agreement will not relieve either party of obligations previously incurred pursuant to this Agreement, including payments which may be due and owing at the time of termination. All sums owed by Customer to Motorola will become due and payable immediately upon termination of this Agreement. Upon the effective date of termination, Motorola will have no further obligation to provide Services. Section 11 LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Except for personal injury or death, Motorola's total liability, whether for breach of contract, warranty, negligence, strict liability in tort, or otherwise, will be limited to the direct damages recoverable under law, but not to exceed the price of twelve (12) months of Service provided under this Agreement. ALTHOUGH THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES OR DAMAGES, THEY AGREE THAT MOTOROLA WILL NOT be liable for any commercial loss; inconvenience; loss of use, Time, DATA, GOOD WILL, REVENUEs, profits or savings; or other SPECIAL, incidental, INDIRECT, OR consequential damages IN ANY WAY RELATED TO OR ARISING FROM THIS AGREEMENT OR THE PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES BY MOTOROLA PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT. No action for contract breach or otherwise relating to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement may be brought more than one (1) year after the accrual of the cause of action, except for money due upon an open account. This limitation of liability will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement and applies notwithstanding any contrary provision. Section 12 EXCLUSIVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS 12.1. This Agreement supersedes all prior and concurrent agreements and understandings between the parties, whether written or oral, related to the Services, and there are no agreements or representations concerning the subject matter of this Agreement except for those expressed herein. The Agreement may not be amended or modified except by a written agreement signed by authorized representatives of both parties. 12.2. Customer agrees to reference this Agreement on any purchase order issued in furtherance of this Agreement, however, an omission of the reference to this Agreement will not affect its applicability. In no event will either party be bound by any terms contained in a Customer purchase order, acknowledgement, or other writings unless: the purchase order, acknowledgement, or other writing specifically refers to this Agreement; clearly indicate the intention of both parties to override and modify this Agreement; and the purchase order, acknowledgement, or other writing is signed by authorized representatives of both parties. Section 13 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 13.1. Any information or data in the form of specifications, drawings, reprints, technical information or otherwise furnished to Customer under this Agreement will remain Motorola's property, will be deemed proprietary, will be kept confidential, and will be promptly returned at Motorola's request. Customer may not disclose, without Motorola's written permission or as required by law, any confidential information or data to any person, or use confidential information or data for any purpose other than performing its August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN obligations under this Agreement. The obligations set forth in this Section survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 13.2. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no commercial or technical information disclosed in any manner or at any time by Customer to Motorola will be deemed secret or confidential. Motorola will have no obligation to provide Customer with access to its confidential and proprietary information, including cost and pricing data. 13.3. This Agreement does not grant directly or by implication, estoppel, or otherwise, any ownership right or license under any Motorola patent, copyright, trade secret, or other intellectual property, including any intellectual property created as a result of or related to the Equipment sold or Services performed under this Agreement. Section 14 FCC LICENSES AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS Customer is solely responsible for obtaining licenses or other authorizations required by the Federal Communications Commission or any other federal, state, or local government agency and for complying with all rules and regulations required by governmental agencies. Neither Motorola nor any of its employees is an agent or representative of Customer in any governmental matters. Section 15 COVENANT NOT TO EMPLOY During the term of this Agreement and continuing for a period of two (2) years thereafter, Customer will not hire, engage on contract, solicit the employment of, or recommend employment to any third party of any employee of Motorola or its subcontractors without the prior written authorization of Motorola. This provision applies only to those employees of Motorola or its subcontractors who are responsible for rendering services under this Agreement. If this provision is found to be overly broad under applicable law, it will be modified as necessary to conform to applicable law. Section 16 MATERIALS, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT All tools, equipment, dies, gauges, models, drawings or other materials paid for or furnished by Motorola for the purpose of this Agreement will be and remain the sole property of Motorola. Customer will safeguard all such property while it is in Customer's custody or control, be liable for any loss or damage to this property, and return it to Motorola upon request. This property will be held by Customer for Motorola's use without charge and may be removed from Customer's premises by Motorola at any time without restriction. Section 17 GENERAL TERMS 17.1. If any court renders any portion of this Agreement unenforceable, the remaining terms will continue in full force and effect. 17.2. This Agreement and the rights and duties of the parties will be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State in which the Services are performed. 17.3. Failure to exercise any right will not operate as a waiver of that right, power, or privilege. 17.4. Neither party is liable for delays or lack of performance resulting from any causes that are beyond that party's reasonable control, such as strikes, material shortages, or acts of God. 17.5. Motorola may subcontract any of the work, but subcontracting will not relieve Motorola of its duties under this Agreement. 17.6. Except as provided herein, neither Party may assign this Agreement or any of its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempted assignment, delegation, or transfer without the necessary consent will be void. August 28, 2015 Motorola Solutions Confidential Restricted MCC 7500 Upgrade Proposal Number: City of Edina, MN Notwithstanding the foregoing, Motorola may assign this Agreement to any of its affiliates or its right to receive payment without the prior consent of Customer. In addition, in the event Motorola separates one or more of its businesses (each a “Separated Business”), whether by way of a sale, establishment of a joint venture, spin-off or otherwise (each a “Separation Event”), Motorola may, without the prior written consent of the other Party and at no additional cost to Motorola, assign this Agreement such that it will continue to benefit the Separated Business and its affiliates (and Motorola and its affiliates, to the extent applicable) following the Separation Event. 17.7. THIS AGREEMENT WILL RENEW, FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR TERM, ON EVERY ANNIVERSARY OF THE START DATE UNLESS EITHER THE COVER PAGE SPECIFICALLY STATES A TERMINATION DATE OR ONE PARTY NOTIFIES THE OTHER IN WRITING OF ITS INTENTION TO DISCONTINUE THE AGREEMENT NOT LESS THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THAT ANNIVERSARY DATE. At the anniversary date, Motorola may adjust the price of the Services to reflect its current rates. 17.8. If Motorola provides Services after the termination or expiration of this Agreement, the terms and conditions in effect at the time of the termination or expiration will apply to those Services and Customer agrees to pay for those services on a time and materials basis at Motorola's then effective hourly rates. Exhibit E System Acceptance Certificate Customer Name: ______________________________________________________ Project Name: ________________________________________________________ This System Acceptance Certificate memorializes the occurrence of System Acceptance. Motorola and Customer acknowledge that: 1. The Acceptance Tests set forth in the Acceptance Test Plan have been successfully completed. 2. The System is accepted. Customer Representative: Motorola Representative: Signature: ____________________________ Signature: ____________________________ Print Name: ___________________________ Print Name: ___________________________ Title: ________________________________ Title: ________________________________ Date: ________________________________ Date: ________________________________ FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE: Motorola has provided and Customer has received all deliverables, and Motorola has performed all other work required for Final Project Acceptance. Customer Representative: Motorola Representative: Signature: ____________________________ Signature: ____________________________ Print Name: ___________________________ Print Name: ___________________________ Title: ________________________________ Title: ________________________________ Date: ________________________________ Date: ________________________________ Motorola.CSA.FINAL.doc Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:2015 Edina Community Council Appointments Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Appoint City representatives to the Edina Community Council. INT RODUCT ION: The Edina Community Council is the decision making body for the Edina Family Services Collaborative and acts as the Advisory Council f or the Edina Resource Center (ERC). AT TACHMENT S: Description Staff Report: 2015 Edina Community Council Appointments City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 November 17, 2015 City Council and Mayor MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Edina Community Council appointments. Appoint City representatives to the Edina Community Council. Information / Background: The following Edina Community Council appointment requests were forwarded from the Edina Resource Center: Organization Appointment Term Human Rights and Relations Commission Dr. Ellen Kennedy, HRRC Commissioner 6/30/2018 Edina Public Health Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator 6/30/2018 Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Patty McGrath, General Manager Edinborough Park/Aquatic Center Item Activity: Subject:Request f or Purchase: Edinborough Park Security Camera Replacement Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Approve request for purchase f or Edinborough Park security camera system. INT RODUCT ION: This is an approved 2015 CI P that will provide increased saf ety and security for all guests and staf f of Edinborough Park. This system includes interior and exterior cameras and will connect to the city-wide system supported by the IT department. AT TACHMENT S: Description Request for Purchase: Edinborough Park Security Camera Replacedment Security Camera Quote City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 November 17, 2015 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Patty McGrath, General Manager Edinborough Park/Aquatic Center Edinborough Park Security Camera Replacement 10/26/2015 11/26/2015 Pro-Tec Design $68,805.84 Recommended Quote or Bid: Pro-Tec Design Information/Background: It is necessary to update the security camera system at Edinborough Park to ensure the safety of our staff and guests, as well as the security of our property. Due to the large number of entrances and exits and the proximity of adjoining properties, the camera system will provide greater protection for the park and our association partners (i.e.: Corporate Center, Brookdale Edina, Residence Inn). This proposal includes the addition of exterior cameras, which we don’t currently have. Pro-Tec has installed effective security systems at the Aquatic Center, Public Works and City Hall. This is a state contract. The project relates to the Vision Edina statement that Edina is willing to use its resources and expertise to apply new ideas and technology. The current system has many limitations and was installed in 2006. It is a stand-alone system with limited capacity related to video quality, storage and review. A more efficient web- based system would allow us remote access to view the park, maintain a safe environment for the public, and view clear images of the facility. This system provides significantly better resolution. This is an approved 2015 CIP. The budget for the project is $73,865 and the cost is $68,805. The new system also requires the installation of a new switch to enable connectivity. The City Technology Services REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Department will purchase the switch through Sysco and install the switch. The cost of the new switch is $3,000, which still brings the project in under budget at a total cost of $71,805. 5005 Cheshire Parkway - Suite #3 - - Minneapolis - MN - 55446 Phone: 763-553-1477 - Fax: 763-553-0204 - Email: solutions@pro-tecdesign.com Sold To:City of Edina Ship To:City of Edina Nick Lovejoy Nick Lovejoy 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 United States 7700 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 United States Phone:(612) 203-0857 Phone:(612) 203-0857 Fax:Fax: Email:nlovejoy@EdinaMN.Gov Email:nlovejoy@EdinaMN.Gov Edinborough Park Camera Additions The following proposal outlines the necessary items for the installation and replacement of the video surveillance system at Edinborough Park. Each camera has been listed individually (replacements along with new additions) for easier evaluation and understanding. Proposal Date Quote Valid For Quote #Rep Terms 10/26/15 30 days PTDQ9140-01 Tim Ferrian Net 30 days Description Unit Price Ext. PriceLineQty 1 1. 2 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 3 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 4 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 5 50 $0.40 $20.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 6 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 7 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 8 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 9 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 10 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 11 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 12 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 13 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 14 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 15 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 16 $1,438.44 SubTotal 17 18 2. 19 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 1 1 of 18 20 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 21 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 22 50 $0.40 $20.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 23 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 24 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 25 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 26 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 27 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 28 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 29 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 30 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 31 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 32 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 33 $1,438.44 SubTotal 34 35 3. 36 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 37 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 38 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 39 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 40 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 41 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 42 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 43 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 44 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 45 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 46 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 47 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 48 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 49 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 50 $1,458.44 SubTotal 51 52 4. 53 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 54 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 55 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 56 150 $0.40 $60.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 57 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 58 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 59 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 60 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 61 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 62 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 63 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 64 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 2 2 of 18 65 5.5 $88.00 $484.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 66 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 67 $1,522.44 SubTotal 68 69 5. 70 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 71 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 72 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 73 150 $0.40 $60.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 74 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 75 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 76 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 77 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 78 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 79 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 80 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 81 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 82 5.5 $88.00 $484.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 83 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 84 $1,522.44 SubTotal 85 86 6. 87 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 88 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 89 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 90 175 $0.40 $70.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 91 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 92 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 93 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 94 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 95 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 96 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 97 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 98 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 99 5.5 $88.00 $484.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 100 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 101 $1,532.44 SubTotal 102 103 7. 104 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 105 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 106 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 107 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 108 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 109 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 3 3 of 18 110 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 111 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 112 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 113 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 114 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 115 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 116 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 117 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 118 $1,458.44 SubTotal 119 120 8. 121 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 122 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 123 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 124 1 $97.56 $97.56MOUNTING BRACKET, POLE, T91A67. INCLUDES STEEL POLE STRAPS AND AXIS T94A01D PENDANT KIT. RECOMMENDED MOUNTING TOOL IS AXIS PN 21776. 125 1 $38.43 $38.43PENDANT KIT, FITS WALL MOUNT BRACKET OR 1.5" NPT THREAD, FOR P3343-V OR P3344-V 126 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 127 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 128 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 129 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 130 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 131 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 132 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 133 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 134 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 135 8 $88.00 $704.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 136 1 $88.00 $88.00PROJECT MANAGER 137 $1,942.43 SubTotal 138 139 9. 140 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 141 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 142 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 143 1 $97.56 $97.56MOUNTING BRACKET, POLE, T91A67. INCLUDES STEEL POLE STRAPS AND AXIS T94A01D PENDANT KIT. RECOMMENDED MOUNTING TOOL IS AXIS PN 21776. 144 1 $38.43 $38.43PENDANT KIT, FITS WALL MOUNT BRACKET OR 1.5" NPT THREAD, FOR P3343-V OR P3344-V 145 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 146 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 147 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 148 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 149 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 150 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 151 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 152 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 4 4 of 18 153 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 154 8 $88.00 $704.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 155 1 $88.00 $88.00PROJECT MANAGER 156 $1,942.43 SubTotal 157 158 10. 159 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 160 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 161 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 162 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 163 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 164 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 165 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 166 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 167 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 168 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 169 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 170 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 171 7 $88.00 $616.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 172 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 173 $1,696.44 SubTotal 174 175 11. 176 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 177 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 178 1 $800.11 $800.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, INDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 179 1 $97.56 $97.56MOUNTING BRACKET, POLE, T91A67. INCLUDES STEEL POLE STRAPS AND AXIS T94A01D PENDANT KIT. RECOMMENDED MOUNTING TOOL IS AXIS PN 21776. 180 1 $38.43 $38.43PENDANT KIT, FITS WALL MOUNT BRACKET OR 1.5" NPT THREAD, FOR P3343-V OR P3344-V 181 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 182 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 183 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 184 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 185 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 186 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 187 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 188 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 189 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 190 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 191 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 192 $1,901.43 SubTotal 193 194 12. 195 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 196 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 5 5 of 18 197 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 198 175 $0.40 $70.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 199 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 200 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 201 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 202 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 203 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 204 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 205 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 206 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 207 5.5 $88.00 $484.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 208 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 209 $1,532.44 SubTotal 210 211 13. 212 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 213 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 214 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 215 175 $0.40 $70.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 216 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 217 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 218 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 219 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 220 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 221 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 222 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 223 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 224 5.5 $88.00 $484.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 225 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 226 $1,532.44 SubTotal 227 228 14. Gym Camera #1 229 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 230 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 231 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 232 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 233 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 234 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 235 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 236 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 237 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 238 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 239 1 $200.00 $200.00LIFT RENTAL, HALF DAY 240 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 241 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 6 6 of 18 242 6 $88.00 $528.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 243 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 244 $1,768.44 SubTotal 245 246 15. 247 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 248 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 249 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 250 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 251 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 252 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 253 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 254 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 255 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 256 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 257 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 258 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 259 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 260 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 261 $1,458.44 SubTotal 262 263 16. Pool Camera 264 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 265 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 266 1 $978.11 $978.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 267 150 $0.40 $60.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 268 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 269 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 270 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 271 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 272 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 273 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 274 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 275 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 276 6 $88.00 $528.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 277 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 278 $2,033.44 SubTotal 279 280 17. 281 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 282 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 283 1 $800.11 $800.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, INDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 284 175 $0.40 $70.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 285 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 286 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 7 7 of 18 287 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 288 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 289 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 290 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 291 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 292 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 293 6 $88.00 $528.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 294 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 295 $1,865.44 SubTotal 296 297 18. 298 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 299 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 300 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 301 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 302 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 303 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 304 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 305 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 306 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 307 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 308 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 309 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 310 7 $88.00 $616.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 311 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 312 $1,696.44 SubTotal 313 314 19. 315 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 316 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 317 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 318 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 319 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 320 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 321 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 322 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 323 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 324 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 325 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 326 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 327 7 $88.00 $616.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 328 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 329 $1,696.44 SubTotal 330 331 20. 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 8 8 of 18 332 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 333 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 334 1 $800.11 $800.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, INDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 335 250 $0.40 $100.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 336 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 337 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 338 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 339 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 340 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 341 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 342 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 343 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 344 8 $88.00 $704.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 345 1 $88.00 $88.00PROJECT MANAGER 346 $2,093.44 SubTotal 347 348 21. 349 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 350 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 351 1 $978.11 $978.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 352 250 $0.40 $100.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 353 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 354 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 355 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 356 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 357 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 358 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 359 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 360 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 361 8 $88.00 $704.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 362 1 $88.00 $88.00PROJECT MANAGER 363 $2,271.44 SubTotal 364 365 22. Cul-de-sac Camera (wireless) 366 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 367 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 368 1 $1,245.11 $1,245.11BULLET-STYLE OUTDOOR-READY NETWORK CAMERA WITH 1080P DETAIL, BUILT-IN IR LEDS AND 18X OPTICAL ZOOM 369 2 $457.14 $914.28SOFTWARE OPTION, 30 MBS THROUGHPUT LICENSE FOR FM3100 MITO SERIES RADIOS. LICENSING REQUIRED FOR BOTH TRANSMITTER AND RECEIVER. 370 2 $1,714.29 $3,428.58FLUIDMESH 3100 MITO, SINGLE MIMO RADIO DEVICE, 1 MBIT/S ETHERNET THROUGHPUT, 4.9-5.8 GHZ WITH INTEGRATED PANEL ANTENNAS, (2) ETHERNET PORTS, INCLUDES PASSIVE POE INJECTOR, AC 90-240V POWER SUPPLY 371 150 $0.40 $60.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 372 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 373 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 9 9 of 18 374 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 375 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 376 1 $75.00 $75.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 377 1 $63.33 $63.33SHIPPING 378 1 $200.00 $200.00LIFT RENTAL, HALF DAY 379 1 $88.00 $88.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 380 1 $88.00 $88.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 381 16 $88.00 $1,408.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 382 2 $88.00 $176.00PROJECT MANAGER 383 $8,010.74 SubTotal 384 385 23. 386 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 387 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 388 1 $978.11 $978.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 389 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 390 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 391 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 392 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 393 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 394 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 395 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 396 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 397 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 398 6 $88.00 $528.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 399 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 400 $2,013.44 SubTotal 401 402 24. 403 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 404 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 405 1 $800.11 $800.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, INDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 406 175 $0.40 $70.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 407 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 408 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 409 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 410 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 411 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 412 1 $200.00 $200.00LIFT RENTAL, HALF DAY 413 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 414 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 415 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 416 6 $88.00 $528.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 417 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 418 $2,065.44 SubTotal 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 10 10 of 18 419 420 25. POS #1 Camera 421 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 422 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 423 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 424 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 425 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 426 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 427 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 428 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 429 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 430 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 431 1 $200.00 $200.00LIFT RENTAL, HALF DAY 432 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 433 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 434 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 435 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 436 $1,698.44 SubTotal 437 438 26. POS #2 Camera 439 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 440 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 441 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 442 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 443 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 444 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 445 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 446 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 447 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 448 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 449 1 $200.00 $200.00LIFT RENTAL, HALF DAY 450 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 451 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 452 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 453 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 454 $1,698.44 SubTotal 455 456 27. Concession #1 Camera 457 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 458 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 459 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 460 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 461 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 462 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 463 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 11 11 of 18 464 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 465 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 466 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 467 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 468 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 469 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 470 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 471 $1,458.44 SubTotal 472 473 28. Concession #2 Camera 474 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 475 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 476 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 477 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 478 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 479 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 480 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 481 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 482 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 483 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 484 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 485 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 486 5 $88.00 $440.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 487 0.5 $88.00 $44.00PROJECT MANAGER 488 $1,458.44 SubTotal 489 490 29. Corporate Center Entrance Camera 491 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 492 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 493 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 494 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 495 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 496 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 497 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 498 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 499 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 500 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 501 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 502 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 503 7 $88.00 $616.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 504 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 505 $1,656.44 SubTotal 506 507 30. Main Entrance Camera 508 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 12 12 of 18 509 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 510 1 $800.11 $800.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, INDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 511 150 $0.40 $60.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 512 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 513 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 514 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 515 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 516 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 517 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 518 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 519 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 520 7 $88.00 $616.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 521 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 522 $1,943.44 SubTotal 523 524 31.Parking Lot General View Camera 525 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 526 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 527 1 $978.11 $978.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 528 1 $97.56 $97.56WALL MOUNT BRACKET, T91A61, FOR P33 SERIES/Q6032/Q5532E/Q5534 529 1 $48.29 $48.29PENDANT KIT, FITS WALL MOUNT BRACKET OR 1.5" NPT THREAD, FOR P33-VE SERIES 530 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 531 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 532 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 533 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 534 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 535 1 $32.00 $32.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 536 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 537 1 $500.00 $500.00LIFT RENTAL, HALF DAY 538 0.5 $86.16 $43.08ENGINEERING SERVICES 539 0.5 $86.16 $43.08CAD DESIGN SERVICE 540 12 $86.16 $1,033.92SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 541 1.5 $86.16 $129.24PROJECT MANAGER 542 $3,278.61 SubTotal 543 544 32. 545 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 546 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 547 1 $978.11 $978.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 548 150 $0.40 $60.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 549 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 550 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 551 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 552 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 13 13 of 18 553 1 $28.00 $28.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 554 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 555 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 556 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 557 7 $88.00 $616.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 558 1 $88.00 $88.00PROJECT MANAGER 559 $2,151.44 SubTotal 560 561 33. Dock Camera 562 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 563 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 564 1 $978.11 $978.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, VANDAL RESISTANT, OUTDOOR, 3-9MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, LIGHTFINDER, BUILT-IN MICROPHONE, 720P 565 100 $0.40 $40.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 566 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 567 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 568 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 569 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 570 1 $28.00 $28.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 571 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 572 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 573 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 574 6 $88.00 $528.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 575 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 576 $2,021.44 SubTotal 577 578 34. 579 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 580 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 581 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 582 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 583 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 584 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 585 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 586 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 587 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 588 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 589 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 590 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 591 6.5 $88.00 $572.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 592 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 593 $1,652.44 SubTotal 594 595 35. Gym Camera #2 596 1 $175.12 $175.12SOFTWARE, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, DEVICE LICENSE, 1 CHANNEL 597 1 $31.68 $31.68PMA SOFTWARE SUPPORT, XPROTECT ENTERPRISE, CAMERA LICENSE, 1 YEAR 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 14 14 of 18 598 1 $533.11 $533.11CAMERA, NETWORK, FIXED DOME, INDOOR, 2.8-6MM VFL, H.264/MJPEG, WDR, 720P (1 MEGAPIXEL) 599 200 $0.40 $80.00CABLE, CAT 6, 23AWG 4PR PLENUM CMP 550MHZ YELLOW JKT, PER FOOT 600 1 $3.67 $3.67CAT6 PATCH CABLE 7-FOOT YELLOW W/SLIM BOOT 601 1 $7.83 $7.83CAT6 QUICKPORT CONNECTOR JACK IVORY, LEVITON 602 1 $1.74 $1.74SURFACE MOUNT BOX, 1-PORT, IVORY, QUICKPORT LEVITON 603 1 $44.40 $44.40MISC MATERIALS, CONNECTORS, ETC. 604 1 $20.00 $20.00WARRANTY & SUPPORT (1 YEAR) 605 1 $28.89 $28.89SHIPPING 606 1 $200.00 $200.00LIFT RENTAL, HALF DAY 607 0.5 $88.00 $44.00ENGINEERING SERVICES 608 0.5 $88.00 $44.00CAD DESIGN SERVICE 609 7 $88.00 $616.00SYSTEMS IMPLEMENTATION SPECIALIST III 610 0.75 $88.00 $66.00PROJECT MANAGER 611 $1,896.44 SubTotal Total $68,805.84 All applicable sales tax has been included. 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 15 15 of 18 Statement of Work 1. PTD to provide and install cameras desired. 2. Proposal follows state contract S-813(5) guidelines. Exclusions 1. City of Edina to provide all servers, workstations, and network switches/connectivity needed for surveillance system. Thank you again for giving me the opportunity to provide you with this information. If you should need any further clarification or assistance, don't hesitate to contact me! To proceed with the proposal, please sign the Proposal Acceptance portion of the proposal and return to me. Tim Ferrian 5005 Cheshire Parkway North, Suite 3 Minneapolis, MN 55446 Email tferrian@pro-tecdesign.com Office (763) 231-8617 Cell (763) 370-7115 Fax (763) 553-0204 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 16 16 of 18 GENERAL NOTES 1. Pricing is based on the work scope and drawings provided to Pro-Tec Design. 2. 110 VAC is PROVIDED by Others unless otherwise specified. 3. Pricing assumes any existing equipment to be re-used is in good operational order. Additional time and material to repair existing equipment is outside this scope of work. 4. Pricing assumes any existing equipment to be re-used is fully compatible with new equipment in this work scope. PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE Edinborough Park Camera Additions City of Edina Nick Lovejoy 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 United States City of Edina Printed Name and Title: Signature:Date: PO# / Reference # (optional): Pro-Tec Design, Inc. Printed Name and Title:Tim Ferrian Director of Sales & Marketing Signature:Date: 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 17 17 of 18 Pro-Tec Design, Inc. Standard Terms and Conditions 1. No liquidated damages will be due. 2. Protection of our work in place is not Pro-Tec Design's responsibility. 3. We will dispose of debris created by our work into Owner-furnished trash bins or container at the site. 4. We do not accept back charges that have not been previously agreed to by us in writing. 5. Late payments will bear interest at the standard prevailing commercial rate. 6. Unless otherwise specified, you will be billed for 30% of the project total immediately after the receipt of an order (ARO). Prompt payment is required to order parts and cover other costs associated with project start-up. 7. We shall then be paid monthly progress payments for agreed upon milestones on or before the 18th day of each month for the value of our work in place plus materials and equipment designed, manufactured, or suitably stored on or off site by us, including any taxes required by law. All invoices shall be paid "Net 30" to ensure uninterrupted performance of work. Final payment is due 30 days following the completion of the project punchlist. 8. No provisions of this Proposal/Contract shall serve to void our rights under Mechanics’ Lien Laws. 9. Nothing in this Proposal/Contract shall be construed to require us to continue performance of work if we do not receive timely payment for properly performed work and suitably stored materials. 10. We retain title to all equipment until installation is complete and reserve the right to retake possession of the same or any part thereof at your cost if default is made by you in any payment. 11. You shall furnish and make available to us at the site reasonable storage and parking facilities, and convenient delivery access to our work. 12. You shall provide uncluttered and safe access for us to perform our work. 13. The schedule of any other contractors involved in this project shall be made in consultation with us, and unless otherwise agreed to, shall provide time for us to perform our work on a 8-hour day, 40-hour week basis. This Proposal/Contract does not include provision for our being required to perform overtime work for any reasons unless otherwise stated. An additional charge to the contract shall be made for any mutually agreed upon overtime. 14. We are not responsible for delays or defaults that are occasioned by causes of any kind beyond our control, including but not limited to delays or defaults of Architects, the Owner, the Contractor, any Subcontractors, other third parties, civil disorders, labor disputes, and Acts of God. We shall be entitled to equitable adjustment for delays caused by any Architect, Engineer, Contractor, or Owner. 15. If any drawings, illustrations, or descriptive matter are furnished with this Proposal/Contract, they are approximate and submitted only to show the general style, arrangement, and dimensions of equipment offered. Final as-built drawings and specifications will be provided to the owner at project completion. 16. THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES THAT EXTEND BEYOND PRO-TEC DESIGN'S STATED SPECIFICATIONS, AND ALL IMPLIED AND EXPRESS WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXCLUDED. 17. The Owner shall purchase and maintain all-risk builder's risk insurance upon the full value of the entire work including materials delivered to the job site, which shall include the interests of Pro-Tec Design. 18. In case of dispute, the prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees. 19. This Proposal/Contract, including the provisions printed above and any specifications or other provisions attached hereto, when accepted by you and Pro-Tec Design shall constitute the Contract between us, and all prior representations or agreements not incorporated herein are superseded. 20. All work to be done during standard business hours, Monday through Friday unless otherwise noted or at a schedule that Pro-Tec Design believes will provide the most project continuity. 21. Pro-Tec Design will warranty the labor and materials covered under this quotation for one year from the date of substantial completion provided the Owner is current in their payments to Pro-Tec Design, Inc. Accounts that are not current shall not receive warranty work until said accounts are made current. Pro-Tec Design will respond during normal business hours Monday through Friday. Weekends, Holidays and after hours warranty support will be billable at standard overtime rates. Warranty does not include replacement or repair of equipment damaged by; Misuse, Over or Under Voltage, or “Acts of God” such as lightning or other weather related incidents. W arranty only covers the repair or replacement of any parts supplied by Pro-Tec and any labor and travel to and from the site to execute said repairs for one (1) year from the date the Owner has beneficial use of the system. No warranty is extended to not in contract (NIC) equipment. NIC equipment is defined as any equipment not supplied by Pro-Tec or existing equipment that is re-used. The troubleshooting, repair or replacement of NIC equipment will be provided by Pro-Tec at a time and materials basis. 22. Customer agrees that during the term of this contract and for two years following termination, they will not directly or indirectly solicit for hire nor contract for services any employee or contractor who performs services hereunder without Pro-Tec Design's written consent 23. The design and/or intent of the items listed in this system specification is considered intellectual property and owned by Pro-Tec Design and will not be disclosed to any party other than those intended by Pro-Tec Design, except as required by law. Impermissible disclosure of this design/intent will subject the proprietor to Consultant Fees equivalent of the above listed design/build quotation. All materials are guaranteed to be as specified. Any alterations or deviation written or verbal from the above specifications involving extra costs will be executed and will become an extra charge over and beyond the above quotation. 24. This proposal and any documents associated with it supersede any prior verbal or written information provided. 25. Pro-Tec Design is not an insurer of Customer's risks and exposures. Pro-Tec shall not be liable for any failure to perform under this Agreement due to any "Act of God," "Force Majeure," of an other cause beyond Pro-Tec Design's control. Pro-Tec Design shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused in whole or in part from negligence, fault, or wrongful act of Customer or of any third persons or parties. Services provided under this Agreement are for the sole benefit of the Customer and no rights are, or may be, conferred on any other party as a third-party beneficiary, by transfer or assignment, or otherwise. Pro-Tec Design's total liability is limited to the contract price; as matter of law, this limitation does not apply to fraud, willful inury, or willful violiation of the law. 10/26/15 Edinborough Park Camera Additions PTDQ9140-01 Page 18 18 of 18 Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ross Bintner P.E. – Environmental Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request f or Purchase: Engineering Services f or Sanitary Capacity Evaluation Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Authorizing City Manager to Sign Engineering Services Proposal for Sanitary Capacity Evaluation. INT RODUCT ION: This project is f unded by the sanitary and water utility f und. The project is listed in the 2015-2019 CI P under project #15-147. The results of this project will inf orm future capital improvement recommendations and land use decision making during the development of the next comprehensive plan. The attached request f or purchase and scope of service documents describes the project in greater detail. AT TACHMENT S: Description Request for Purchase: Engineering Services for Sanitary Capacity Evaluation Barr Engineer - Scope of Service City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 November 17, 2015 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Ross Bintner P.E. – Environmental Engineer Request for Purchase: Engineering Services for Sanitary Capacity Evaluation October 19, 2015 N/A Barr Engineering Company $165,205 Recommended Quote or Bid: Barr Engineering Company Information/Background: The Edina Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2008. In acknowledgement of pressure to redevelop to mixed uses, and a projected increase in development density, a sanitary sewer model was created and is described in Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8. The model has been used to describe trends in system flow and to model existing pipe capacity. In 2011 the Met Council completed a relief interceptor serving Richfield and Edina extended to Edina’s border at 75th and Xerxes. This relief interceptor provides ample sanitary capacity for future growth in Southeast Edina. The 2008 plan describes the need for subsequent demand analysis as development and flow trends become clearer, and the construction of additional flow capacity in southeast Edina to extend the capacity available in the MCES system. While city wide flow over the past decade exhibits a flat to downward trend; Edina continues to see significant demand growth through development proposals around Southeast Edina and Pentagon Park, consistent with the 2008 plan. Edina is also experiencing modest local demand growth at commercial nodes such as 50th and France, Grandview, Cahill and Valleyview/Wooddale. Development density in 2008 comp plan, revised populations and workforce estimates and recent development related modifications continue to exemplify this trend of localized sanitary demand growth. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 This project will collect and acquire data, adapt and calibrate a sanitary sewer flow model, project future growth scenarios, identify current and future capacity constraints, provide alternatives to meet current and future demand, investigate cost and feasibility of a subset of alternatives, and provide preliminary engineering for recommend capital improvements. The objective of this project is to update and enhance the existing sanitary system model, test a variety of probable development scenarios, judge the adequacy of existing infrastructure to meet future service demand, evaluate and define system risks and backup prevention practices, identify areas prone to backup and recommend standards of practice, policy or capital improvements that serve future demand and mitigate risk. This project is funded by the sanitary and water utility fund. The project is listed in the 2015- 2019 CIP under project #15-147 that includes funding of $120,000 in 2015 and $250,000 in 2016 for study and preliminary engineering. The results of this project will inform land use decision making during the development of the next comprehensive plan and may lead to CIP recommendations designed as early as 2016 with construction in 2017. Consultant Selection Process A Request for Proposals for the Study was published on September 16, 2015. On October 19, 2015 staff received proposals from the following consultants: AE2S, Barr Engineering, Bolton and Menk, CDM Smith, HR Green, Stantec, and WSB & Associates. Proposals were evaluated and select consultants were interviewed by a selection committee made up of staff from the engineering, public works departments. Staff then worked with Barr to further refine the scope of services. Staff recommends approving the proposal with Barr Engineering Company REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 3 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 G:\PW\INFRAS\UTILITIES DIV\SANITARY SEWER\Modeling and Studies\2015-16 SE EDINA Sanitary Capacity\Admin\151117 BARR Professional Service.docx November 6, 2015 Mr. Ross Bintner, PE Environmental Engineer City of Edina Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Agreement for Comprehensive Sewer Planning - Southeast Edina Sewer Preliminary Engineering Dear Mr. Bintner: Barr will complete the proposed scope of work (attached) in accordance with the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services. Project fees will be billed on a time and expense basis, not to exceed the total of $165,205 without prior approval from authorized City of Edina staff. We appreciate the opportunity to continue providing engineering services to the City of Edina and look forward to working with you on this project. If the proposed scope of services and fees are satisfactory, please sign a copy of this letter in the space provided, and return it to us at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, BARR ENGINEERING CO. By _______________________________ Brian K. LeMon Its Vice President Accepted this day of , 2015 CITY OF EDINA By ________________________________ Its ________________________________ Submitted by Barr Engineering Co. November 6, 2015 proposal for comprehensive sewer planning Southeast Edina sewer preliminary engineering Prepared for the City of Edina November 6, 2015 Ross T. Bintner, PE City of Edina Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Request for proposal for comprehensive sewer planning, Southeast Edina sewer preliminary engineering Dear Mr. Bintner: Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) is pleased to submit our proposal to the City of Edina to complete sanitary sewer modeling, planning, and engineering services. As the city of Edina develops, you want to prepare to serve areas of increasing demand while safely and efficiently maintaining existing service. We can help. Barr’s modeling expertise, along with our deep understanding of your sanitary sewer system, puts us in the best position to assist the city because: Familiarity with your system enables us to focus our efforts and maximize your value. Barr has worked on projects in the city of Edina for decades, building a strong resume and deep understanding of the unique character of your city. We have worked on your sanitary system since 2005 when we built the detailed XP-SWMM model that represents the city’s sanitary sewer system and continue to use the model to assist the city in planning redevelopment projects. We already know the areas where your system is close to full capacity and have protocols set up to address redevelopment requests. A proven ability to evaluate and advise on utility service policy results in valuable recommendations that are consistent with industry standards . We have added Bryan Oakley to our team because of his experience assisting municipal clients in developing utility ordinances and engineering guidelines for utility construction. He helped prepare the “Sanitary Sewer Utility Connections” and “Storm Sewer Utility Connections” sections of a stormwater manual for the City of Minneapolis. Bryan’s experience will be instrumental in preparing policy and recommending capital improvements that will prepare you to meet redevelopment pressures. A deep bench of H&H experts with extensive XP-SWMM knowledge will assure your project is done right, within the desired timeframe. With a dedicated team of over 30 experienced H&H modelers, including our proposed project manager Sarah Stratton, Barr has the capacity and the technical knowledge to get your project done both efficiently and accurately. We have built a reputation for XP-SWMM technical excellence. In fact, our expert modeling team is often called on to review others’ models and suggest modifications to improve the reliabi lity of the results, earning the respect of clients, regulators, and outside reviewers. Our team will be led by a seasoned project manager Sarah Stratton, CFM, ENV SP, a familiar face who has a proven track record of managing and delivering successful H&H modeling projects, including those for the City of Edina. An experienced project manager, her strength lies in the details, a quality needed to successfully complete H&H modeling projects and meet schedule commitments. Ross T. Bintner November 6, 2015 Page 2 We look forward to working with you. If you have any questions regarding our qualifications, please contact me (blemon@barr.com, 952-832-2774) or Sarah Stratton (sstratton@barr.com, 952-832-2860). Sincerely, Brian LeMon, PE Sarah Stratton, CFM, ENV SP Vice President, Principal in Charge Project Manager Barr Engineering Co. contents project understanding ................................................................................................................... 1 firm background and experience ............................................................................................... 2 scope of work ................................................................................................................................ 12 work plan .................................................................................................................................. 12 timeline and deliverables ....................................................................................................... 17 cost .................................................................................................................................................. 18 assumptions .............................................................................................................................. 19 attachment A: figures attachment B: detailed cost spreadsheet WR03P152.15 Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 1 project understanding Edina has experienced a great deal of change over the past few decades. The Southdale area has grown as redevelopment pressures have shaped the area into a more vertical environment. Numerous one- and two-story buildings are being torn down and replaced by taller buildings that are increasing population density and adding load to your sanitary system. Barr has provided sanitary services with the same staff for the last 10 years. We bring continuity and in-depth knowledge of your system, and we’re committed to providing ongoing support as you continue to plan for and address redevelopment issues. With redevelopment comes the need to evaluate and assess the capability of your sanitary system to meet changing loads. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) saw the need for added capacity in southeast Edina and increased the capacity of interceptor 1-RF-491. As individual redevelopment requests are put in front of the city, Edina staff need a way to determine if similar utility upgrades are needed to meet increased demand. This project is about providing you the tools and experts needed to make those assessments that can help form the policy that will allow you to deal with property owners and developers fairly. The drivers for this project are: redevelopment pressure in and around Southeast Edina including Pentagon Park, 50th and France, Grandview, Cahill and the Valley View/Wooddale area the upcoming comprehensive planning cycle and accompanying sanitary sewer comprehensive plan need for policy updates to address redevelopment and other issues With our in-depth knowledge of your sanitary system and the redevelopment within the city, Barr is well positioned to help you prepare a thoughtful, comprehensive, and forward-thinking plan that addresses system capacity constraints and documents policies for future growth and program implementation. City staff and council members will need to make big decisions about aging infrastructure and its ability to meet increasing demands as redevelopment continues. Some will be multi-million dollar decisions. City staff need accurate, up-to-date tools to make informed decisions related to these infrastructure issues. Barr will develop an updated sanitary sewer system model, calibrated to new water sales data, to provide the basis and support for infrastructure improvement decisions. The city will also benefit from Barr’s institutional knowledge. Barr developed and calibrated the existing XP-SWMM sanitary sewer model, allowing us to hit the ground running. Attachment A includes a figure showing the extents of the city’s existing sanitary sewer model and locations of the MCES interceptors that receive flow from the city. A second figures shows an example of the output of a previous capacity study. We already know the choke points in your system and have ideas about how to alleviate them. Our many years of experience attending meetings with MCES and the City of Bloomington will enable us to walk you through these issues and will enhance our future planning and design efforts in the City of Edina. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 2 firm background and experience Barr’s commitment to municipal infrastructure and water resources is strong. More than 150 of our Minneapolis-based engineers and scientists are engaged in water resources engineering and design, wastewater management, stormwater management, wetland management, limnology, and landscape ecology. Our breadth and depth of experience means we can provide innovative solutions to any wastewater or water resource challenge we encounter. Barr’s engineers and scientists use XP-SWMM extensively to model complex sanitary and storm sewer systems and have found it to be accurate and helpful in solving complex problems. Solutions not originally expected by modelers have become evident when minor changes to the sewer system were modeled using XP-SWMM. These solutions to municipal inflow and infiltration (I&I) problems save our clients significant amounts of money and maximize the use of existing resources. experience with wastewater projects Barr has extensive experience working on the planning, design, and operation of municipal and industrial wastewater collection, pumping, and treatment systems. We have assisted Edina with 10 separate projects analyzing the impacts of new development to the sanitary sewer system, including the Grandview area, the Westin, the Byerly’s site, and others. In addition, we have worked on hundreds of lift stations and treatment plants across the upper Midwest. As proof, an abbreviated list of lift station projects is included in table 1 below. Our team’s experience includes collection system planning and design, sewer separation projects, lift stations, wastewater treatment plants, and policy and ordinance preparation. Most of this experience is Barr specific but also includes work by our current team members in previous positions. A list of the most relevant work is included below. sanitary-sewer system inflow, infiltration, and capacity study client: City of Edina services provided: sanitary-sewer system infiltration and inflow analysis comprehensive planning XP-SWMM modeling to determine collection system capacity Over the past 15 years, land south of Southdale Mall was developed, and sites adjacent to the mall were proposed for large residential complexes and hotel projects, which now exist. When these buildings were in the proposal stage, the City of Edina wanted to be sure its existing sanitary-sewer capacity was adequate to handle added flow from the proposed projects. At the same time, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) initiated a program to reduce infiltration and inflow (I&I) originating in communities that convey sewage to them for treatment. MCES requires that all communities with excessive I&I prepare an engineering study to identify the sources of the I&I and work to eliminate it at the source rather than make expensive modifications to their infrastructure such as interceptors and treatment plants. These projects also lined up with the time when communities were preparing their 2008 comprehensive plans. The City of Edina hired Barr to work on all three projects. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 3 A cornerstone for this three-pronged planning and study effort was the XP-SWMM program, which was used to model the sanitary sewer in the study area and develop a model of existing conditions for the areas where development was proposed and where I&I was a problem. XP-SWMM was selected as the appropriate model for this effort because it was originally developed specifically to model combined sewer overflows. In addition, an XP-SWMM model of the city’s storm-sewer system already existed, allowing for analysis of both systems at once which increased the likelihood of identifying I&I issues. Work included: gathering as-built sewer data and MCES meter data to define the pipes, manholes, and flow parameters needed to construct an accurate sanitary-sewer model for the area working with city staff and selecting developers to estimate appropriate existing and future flow factors for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional properties using water sales data installing flow meters during dry and wet weather to gather flow data to calibrate the model constructing and running an XP-SWMM model of the study area identifying areas where existing sewers were not adequate to handle proposed flows identifying where excessive I&I was originating from by comparing predicted ponding over sanitary-sewer manholes to actual flow produced during a wet weather event preparing the sanitary-sewer component of the comprehensive plan The work related to identifying where excessive I&I was originating was truly innovative. By running the storm sewer and sanitary sewer models in conjunction for a measured rainfall event when flow meters were installed in the sanitary system, Barr was able to create a map that prioritized the areas where the city could focus its effort to repair its sanitary system, knowing it would reduce I&I. Old, vented manholes covers were replaced with new, unvented covers. Manholes in need of repair could be prioritized based on likely contribution to I&I. The modeling effort resulted in a simple, easy-to- understand map that showed areas of highest I&I probability with graduated manhole symbols. Following this work, Barr assisted the city on numerous occasions in assessing the capacity of existing sewers to handle the increased inflow from projects like the Filmtec expansion, the Westin, the Byerly’s redevelopment, and a major Fairview Hospital expansion. During this process, we developed a new way to make assessing the availability of capacity in the existing sanitary sewer easier to accomplish. The innovative process resulted in simple-to-understand color-coded maps accompanied by tables that allow the user to check where a redevelopment is proposed. By knowing the number of sewer availability charge units associated with a given development, the user can check the map and table to see how many more units any given pipe in the mapped area can accept. Updating these maps is one of the main benefits for this project. Since the maps were created, a number of developments have been constructed, meaning the maps should be updated to keep them accurate. other sanitary sewer projects Barr has provided a variety of sanitary sewer related services to a number of clients, in some cases for close to two decades. This experience allows us to understand complex sanitary problems that can affect the way a community plans for system upgrades. It gives us access to numerous bid tabs for use in cost-estimating alternatives as well as access to the policy that many of these communities Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 4 have adopted to address reconstruction of aging infrastructure. A brief list of these clients and a short description of some of the work we’ve provided follows. clients: Cities of Brainerd, Lakeville, Burnsville, St. Louis Park, Lilydale, Hibbing, and others services provided: feasibility planning for major wastewater treatment plant renovations (Brainerd and Hibbing) identification of the source of difficult-to-treat pollutants (Brainerd) completed preliminary review for lift station upgrades (Burnsville, Lakeville, St. Louis Park) prepared engineering reports with cost estimates (numerous clients) prepared plans and specifications for bidding and construction administration (numerous clients) assisted with lift station standardization document (Burnsville) provided project management, design, and construction administration services (numerous clients) Barr has worked with the City of Burnsville since 2008 to rehabilitate its aging and underperforming sanitary sewer lift stations. We completed preliminary review of the sewer sheds to establish design criteria for average and peak daily flows with consideration for future flows, prepared engineering reports with cost estimates, prepared plans and specifications for bidding, and provided construction administration. We also assisted with development of a lift station standardization document to use as a guide for future rehabilitation projects and new installations so that the City can limit the number of parts it needs to keep in stock for emergency repairs. Following this work, we provided full engineering services for the upgrade or replacement of the Maple Island Lift Station, the Keller Lake Lift Station, and the Echo Valley Lift Station. The work provided for Burnsville was a result of a recommendation from then utilities supervisor Ken Seurer to City of Burnsville staff. Our work for Lakeville has been ongoing since the early 1990s and includes work on numerous lift stations. Tasks included planning efforts to identify flow requirements and development scenarios to ensure that station upgrades were adequate to address future flow requirements. Projects include station upgrades for lift stations 7-9, 22, Brandtjen Farm, and Prairie Lake. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 5 In addition to the work for Burnsville and Lakeville, we have worked on hundreds of other stations. A partial list is shown below. Many of these projects required planning for future development so that the stations could be sized properly. Work for Edina will include alternatives analysis that may include lift stations. Edina will benefit from this experience since it allows us to analyze when and where a lift station or lift station upgrade makes sense and how much it will cost. In addition to lift stations, Barr assisted Brainerd in the planning, permitting, and design of a $24 million sanitary sewer plant upgrade. This project involved long-term detailed planning to assess flow rate and future capacity needs. Flow equalization basins needed to be sized as part of the sequencing batch reactor. Understanding existing and future flows was critical in this design. If too much flow equalization was brought on line too quickly, the plant would not function correctly. If too little was available, sewage bypasses into the river might occur. Barr led a team of engineers to successfully work with the city to understand and plan for the right flow. In addition, Barr helped the city in negotiating with a neighboring community, Baxter, whose sanitary flow is also directed to this plant. We also assisted with planning and policy work surrounding how the costs of the plant would be split between the communities, Finally, our electrical engineering group has worked extensively on sanitary projects of all kinds, from lift stations to treatment plants. The monitoring and control of sanitary systems are tasks they work on every day. This is relevant, since upgrades to your system necessitated by redevelopment will include monitoring and control of numerous complex systems including lift station and flow meters. With this experience in house, Barr can quickly and easily determine the feasibility and cost of SCADA and power-related project components. This electrical group is recognized across the upper Midwest for its work and is hired by other consultants regularly to perform the electrical- and control-related design for their projects. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 6 Table 1: Partial list of Barr lift station projects Municipality # of stations Station names Albertville, MN 5 Andrews Ave, Phillip Morris, S.W, plus two others Austin, MN 3 Hope, Southwest and Main Lift Station Avon, MN 2 Multiple system station project Big Lake, MN 8 LS #1, 2, 9 12-14, Shores of Lake Mitchell 8th, Westside Trunk Birchwood Village, MN 2 System lift stations & Wildwood Avenue Lift Blaine, MN 9 The Lakes, Eagle Creek, two System LS, LS #15, Peterson Farm, Section 12, TPS Main and 12th Addition Bloomington, MN 13 Bloom Hill, Bush Lake, Chalet, Overlook, Storm, Vincent & LS #1-5, 10-12, 14 Braham, MN 3 Horseshoe Meadows and two system lift stations Brooklyn Center, MN 2 Two system lift stations Brooklyn Park, MN 3 Three system lift stations Buffalo, MN 14 LS # 1-8, 10, 24 and system lift stations Burnsville, MN 3 Maple Island, Echo Valley and System Lift station Cambridge, MN 3 2nd Addition, Garfield, North Ridge Carroll, IA 1 System lift station Chanhassen, MN 3 Dogwood, LS#3 and 10 Cologne, MN 2 System lift station & Winkler Crossing Eden Prairie, MN 3 Pioneer Trail, Sheland Rd, Sunny Meadows Edina, MN 4 LS, #1, 6, 10 & Morningside Elk River, MN 9 Highway 10, Hillside Estate, Jackson Street, Kliiever Lake Fields, Meadowoods, Orrin Thompson, Trout Brook and Westwood Elko, MN 4 Boulder Point, Chown, Pfarmingan, Natchez Ave Freeport, MN 2 System lift stations Grand Rapids, MN 2 System lift station and Maxwell Hanover, MN 2 System lift station and CSAH 34 Hinckley, MN 2 System lift station and Zhingwaak Oodena Hopkins, MN 2 LS #4 and 5 Howard Lake, MN 5 Dutch Lake, East, and system lift stations Hugo, MN 7 129th St, Diamond Point, Fabled Hills & four others Lakeville, MN 8 LS # 7-9, 22, Brandtjen Farm and Prairie Lake plus studies Minnetonka, MN 10 Acorn Ridge, Burchlane, Clarion Hills, Ford, Main, and others North Branch, MN 9 Falson Ave, Gateway, Lucht's Crossing and others Otsego, MN 8 Orrin Thompson, Preserve, Quaday and others St. Cloud, MN 11 Ayers Mill, Airport, Augusta, Main Lift, Southeast & others Partial list total* 164 *We have worked on a total of over 400 lift stations to date Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 7 project personnel Role: Principal in charge, technical resource, QA/QC Employee category: Principal Brian LeMon, PE Vice President, Senior Civil Engineer BS, Civil Engineering; BA, Applied Science Brian has over 30 years of experience, much of it in municipal wastewater collection treatment; and pumping system design. He is knowledgeable in the areas of sanitary sewer system planning and analysis; sanitary sewage pumping-station design; and combined-sewer separation projects. He has worked on sanitary sewer systems for St. Paul, Minneapolis, Brainerd, Lakeville, St. Louis Park, Chanhassen, Lilydale, and over a dozen other communities. Brian served as principal in charge of the Edina sanitary sewer modeling project (which includes 175 miles of gravity main and 24 lift stations) and has overseen the continued use of the model to assist the city in planning multiple redevelopment projects. He has also led infiltration and inflow analysis inspections and designs for the City of Edina, as well as three lift station rehabilitation projects. As principal in charge, Brian will oversee the project and verify that the city is satisfied with the work being done by our team. A sanitary sewer expert, Brian will also be a technical resource for the project and will be involved in meetings with city staff. Role: Project manager Employee category: Senior scientist Sarah Stratton, CFM, ENV SP Senior Water Resources Scientist MS, Water Resources Sarah has over 16 years of experience in hydrologic and hydraulic analyses. Her areas of expertise include integration of GIS with H&H modeling on stormwater and floodplain management studies. She regularly serves as a project manager for Barr’s SWMM H&H projects including those for the City of Edina’s STS-406 stormwater improvement project, the City of Minneapolis’s Central City tunnel system XP-SWMM modeling and mitigation alternatives study, and several XP-SWMM studies for the Valley Branch Watershed District (Sunfish Lake, Goetschel Pond, Silver Lake, Downs Lake, and Raleigh Creek). Sarah also developed and calibrated the FEMA-approved Nine Mile Creek XP- SWMM model (Nine Mile Creek Watershed District) and also managed a follow-up project that assessed the impacts of NOAA’s Atlas 14 precipitation depths on Nine Mile Creek flood levels. As project manager, Sarah will manage the overall project (scope, budget, schedule, team coordination, updates for the city, etc.) and will attend meetings with city staff along with Brian. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 8 Role: Technical lead Employee category: Senior engineer Dan Nesler, PE Civil/Environmental Engineer BS, Environmental Engineering Dan has 13 years of experience in sanitary system planning, modeling and analysis, design, inspection, and construction management. He has worked on sanitary system inspections for multiple cities and performed hydraulic modeling of Edina’s sanitary sewer system for use in future city planning. In addition to this he has created truly innovative uses for XP-SWMM that have helped Edina focus its efforts to eliminate I&I and easily analyze remaining sewer capacity. Other sanitary sewer work has included the design of a sanitary sewer and oily water sewer system for a refinery, design of numerous sanitary sewer lift stations and collection system extensions. His other work focuses on hydraulic and hydrologic modeling, hydraulic design, feasibility and alternative evaluation studies, site plan design, and construction management and inspection. He also has experience estimating costs for construction projects such as sanitary sewers, pump stations, municipal wells, and detention ponds. Having developed the original City of Edina XP-SWMM sanitary sewer model, Dan will be the technical lead for this project. His expertise and knowledge of the technical details related to the City’s XP-SWMM sanitary model will be instrumental in developing a reliable and realistic model to use for planning and alternatives analyses. Role: XP-SWMM modeler Employee category: Junior engineer Michael McKinney, EIT Water Resources Specialist MS, Environmental Engineering Michael has a background in a wide range of water resources-related disciplines, from hydrologic modeling and open-channel engineering to environmental engineering chemistry and low-impact development for nonpoint-source pollution control. At Barr, he specializes in H&H modeling and water quality modeling and has gained experience in sanitary sewer modeling, stream restoration, stormwater best management practice design, in-lake water quality modeling, and flood risk analysis. Michael was added to our Edina team a few years back to add depth of bench to our sanitary and stormwater modeling team as part of a long term plan to serve the City. He has used XP-SWMM for sanitary sewer modeling for the City of Edina, and has also used XP-SWMM to evaluate areas of high flood potential throughout the city as part of the STS-406 stormwater improvement project. Michael’s familiarity with the City’s XP-SWMM sanitary sewer model means we have the ability to respond rapidly to your needs and quickly focus our modeling efforts. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 9 Role: Technical resource Employee category: Senior engineer Bryan Oakley, PE Senior Civil Engineer MSCE, Environmental Engineering Bryan has 25 years of experience in civil, water, and wastewater engineering and project management for municipal and industrial clients. His work includes design engineering for municipal water and wastewater treatment and pilot testing as well. Bryan has served as the consultant city engineer for several Minnesota cities providing engineering design and construction administration for water, sewer, street, and stormwater improvements. He also assisted client communities in developing engineering guidelines for utility construction, hook-up fee and rate structures, and utility ordinances. He also helped prepare the “Sanitary Sewer Utility Connections” and “Storm Sewer Utility Connections” sections of a stormwater manual for the City of Minneapolis. Bryan has served as a representative on the Plymouth Planning Commission since February 2011 and has reviewed numerous new development and redevelopment proposals for the City in that time. Role: Civil designer Employee category: Civil technician Patrick Brockamp, EIT Water Resources Specialist BS, Civil Engineering Patrick has four years of experience as a water resources specialist. He works on a variety of projects including stormwater design, low-impact development, flood control, and watershed modeling. His work has included performing stormwater pollution prevention monitoring and designing stormwater treatment features, such as raingardens and infiltration basins, for projects in the Twin Cities area, including the Maplewood mall and living streets projects. Patrick is proficient in XP-SWMM, AutoCAD Civil 3D, ArcGIS, and HydroCAD. His role on this project will focus on preliminary engineering, especially as it relates to cost estimating and planning-level design. Role: GIS specialist Employee category: Technician Joshua Vosejpka GIS Specialist BS, Geography (Geographic Information Systems) Joshua has several years of experience in geographic information systems. At Barr, he uses GIS for figure and map creation, interprets aerial photos, analyzes raster and vector data, creates and maintains GIS databases, and coordinates GIS work with other software applications. Joshua’s work has included assisting with utility corridor permitting and desktop analysis for site selection; processing staged elevation surfaces for modeling mine pit filling, volume calculations, and anticipated water-level rise; processing flood inundations and impacts; and calculating pond volumes and other variables needed for water- quality modeling. Joshua provided GIS support services for the City’s STS-406 stormwater improvement project. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 10 Role: CADD Employee category: Technician Gareth Becker Civil Designer Civil Engineering Technician Diploma Gareth has four years of experience in 3D civil design primarily using AutoCAD Civil3D, Cyclone, and Revit to prepare construction plans, process laser scan data, and build 3D models. He performs HDS laser scan surveys, manages and inspects construction sites, and performs a variety of other field jobs. He also uses Microstation and Civil3D software to recover quantities, delineate wetlands, and determine flow paths. Prior to joining Barr, he worked as a survey crew assistant performing topographic surveys using total stations with and without robotics as well as GPS rovers. project manager and project management approach Our management approach offers the city both knowledge of your system and efficiency. We will leverage the capabilities and study-area insights of senior-level technical experts to guide and oversee the tasks and deliverables completed by our modeling and civil design technicians. Our team will be led by a familiar face, seasoned project manager Sarah Stratton, who has a proven track record of managing and delivering successful H&H modeling projects, including those for the City of Edina. An experienced project manager, her strength lies in the details, a quality needed to successfully complete H&H modeling projects. Sarah recently managed the STS-406 stormwater improvement project for the city and has been conducting and managing H&H studies for over 16 years. Sarah will manage the project from start to finish. While Sarah will manage the overall project (scope, budget, schedule, team coordination, updates for the city, etc.), she will receive additional support from senior staff with study area and source data knowledge who will provide input to facilitate an accurate modeling, alternatives analyses, and planning process. Dan Nesler will serve as the technical lead on the project. Brian LeMon and Bryan Oakley will serve as technical resources. Close communication between city staff and the Barr team will be critical to project success. Although not included explicitly in the RFP, we recommend an initial kick-off meeting at the start of the contract to discuss the details of the scope and schedule as well as lines of communication. During the kick-off meeting, we would like to discuss our client service plan. Our team will create a client service plan following selection to document city expectations, goals, and preferences. The client service plan is designed to enhance our client service by: 1. defining background information we would like to know before starting the project 2. improving communications and project delivery by understanding your preferences 3. anticipating concerns by learning what aspects of the project are most important to you Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 11 This plan will be a guide to all team members. Items covered in the client service plan include: contact information for relevant team members communications criteria (for instance, the plan will record preferences for communicating via telephone versus email and at regular intervals or on an as-needed basis) status report preferences report styles billing formats additional information needed to respond quickly and consistently to your needs Regular progress reports will be provided to the city at an interval determined during the kick-off meeting. Reports will include overall progress for the most recent period and will identify if we are waiting on receipt of city data, input, review, and/or approval. Additional meetings can be held in person or by conference call as necessary throughout the course of the project. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 12 scope of work work plan The overall objective of this project is to ensure that city staff have access to the tools and sanitary sewer experts needed to prepare Edina to meet the needs of the areas of growing demand without compromising existing service. This will be accomplished by updating the XP-SWMM model we prepared for the city in 2006. The model was one of the most accurate models ever created by Barr, meeting calibration targets to within 95 percent. However, the model was constructed using pre- recession water sales data that is now over 10 years old. Since that time, water use trends have changed, parts of the system have been lined or otherwise repaired and, most importantly, the city has replaced all of its water meters, meaning that new, more accurate water use data is now available. In addition, Filmtec has expanded and the Westin and other large developments have been constructed. Once the model is updated, we will work with the city to define areas of redevelopment and ranges of development density. We will then use the model to evaluate the impact of the proposed redevelopment scenarios and identify areas where existing pipes are at or near capacity and are at risk of surcharging. Using this information, we will develop planning-level options to accommodate future projected sanitary flows in areas where existing infrastructure is inadequate and then complete preliminary engineering design of options and estimate their cost. The project will be summarized in a technical report that documents the model and the upgrades, identifies areas of concern, and identifies upgrades needed to meet future demands and their estimated costs. Following is a breakdown of each task. task 1: project initiation objective: Confirm that the project team and scope of work as defined meets the city’s needs. description: This task will consist of a kick-off meeting and completion of a client service plan. We will hold a kick-off meeting that will be attended by key city and Barr staff. During this meeting, we will introduce you to new team members and discuss project communications and protocol (see project manager and project management approach for additional detail of what we propose here). We will complete a client service plan interview and compile meeting minutes. We will also review the proposed scope. deliverables meeting invitation meeting agenda client service plan meeting minutes scope modifications, if needed Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 13 schedule: Shortly after project award in late November cost: $2,610 task 2: data acquisition objective: Obtain the information needed to update the XP-SWMM model. description: This task will consist of obtaining data needed to update the model from a number of sources external to Barr. The data to be acquired includes: obtain flow data for meters M127, M128, and M129 from MCES obtain lift station runtime and flow meter data (lift station 6) from city, if/when available obtain digital copies of quarterly water sales billing data for the entire city for the winter quarter of 2014. Data should include volume of water billed, address, and property identification number (PID), if available obtain digital copies of monthly water use data for December 2015 and January 2016 for the entire city for the winter quarter of 2014. Data should include volume of water billed, address, and property identification number (PID), if available obtain digital copies of hourly data from 12 different locations, 4 from standard residential homes, 4 from condominium units, and 4 representative of senior housing obtain digital copies of hourly data from the 20 largest water users in the city obtain digital copies of hourly data for Fairview Hospital obtain current digital parcel data from either the city or Hennepin County obtain city’s GIS shapefile reflecting sanitary sewer reconstruction areas over the last 15 years obtain city’s GIS data documenting changes to pipes (e.g., pipe lining or repair projects in Edina where old VCP sanitary pipes in the city have been repaired or lined with materials that would affect Mannings “n” values of the pipes as currently modeled). Barr will review the data once it is received for completeness, consistency, and accuracy. Data gaps will be identified and, if significant, additional requests will be made to fill in the gaps. If additional data is not available and if it is critical to model upgrades, we will work with the entity who owns data to agree on synthesized data to use in its place, and will propose the change to city staff for approval. Note that our proposal cost assumes that if data synthesis is needed, it will be billed as an extra cost on a time-and-materials basis. Once in hand, Barr will review the hourly data and create parcel-specific diurnal inputs for the 20 largest water users based on the hourly data obtained from the city. We will then review the different sets of hourly data for the residential meters and, if deemed valuable, synthesize additional diurnal curves for use in the model. Placement of temporary meters in the field will improve model accuracy and will help better define current conditions and capacity available for redevelopment. The cost for this additional metering task assumes that eight flow meters will be installed in the area of redevelopment in southeast Edina and at select locations in the rest of the city for a period of two weeks during this winter. Barr will recommend metering locations and work with the city on the selection of the actual locations to meet the city’s goals for updating the model. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 14 deliverables: tabulation of data obtained provided in a brief technical memorandum, and inclusion in an appendix of the final report schedule: Obtaining and review of data will be complete by February 26, 2016. Note that this is dependent on a timely response from both MCES and the city. Meter data from MCES and water sales data from the city will be needed by mid-February. cost: $42,245 (includes flow metering using eight additional temporary meters) task 3: demand planning objective: Define range of future demand scenarios for consideration. description: This task will consist of working with the city to identify the locations, range of density, and timeframe of potential redevelopment. Based on recent redevelopment projects in the city, Barr will work with city staff to determine a low-, mid-, and high-density of redevelopment at the selected locations and two timelines for the redevelopment. This will result in six development scenarios that will be modeled. Barr will summarize the scenarios with maps and text as appropriate and obtain buy-in from the city that these scenarios are consistent with other work to be included in comprehensive planning. This task will include two meetings. The first will include city planners presenting growth scenarios (locations and densities) to be used in comprehensive planning efforts. The second will consist of Barr presenting our interpretation of the demand scenarios and a discussion of the resulting sanitary flows. Barr assumes that the city will provide a digital copy of an economic development map showing lot-by-lot areas proposed for potential redevelopment. deliverables: meeting invitations meeting agendas meeting minutes with demand/growth scenarios technical memorandum summarizing work completed, including figures showing the locations and densities of the potential redevelopment and their timelines schedule: Complete by January 31, 2015 cost: $19,080 task 4: model update objective: Create a current version of the sanitary sewer model. description: This task will consist of updating the existing sanitary sewer model for use in predicting future demand scenarios. Work on this task could begin as soon as data requested in task 2 is received and while work on task 3 is occurring. The fist subtask will include updating the physical representation of the piping network to include pipe lining and repair projects and relevant lift station modifications that have occurred since the creation of the model in 2006. Barr assumes that all data needed for pipe revisions and/or additions will be provided in a GIS format by the city. Barr will review the data format currently used by the city to document the projects and provide input to Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 15 make sure the data fields are set in a way that will be easy to import and use in the modeling effort. Following this, we will update model flow inputs based on the most recent winter quarter flow data from new water meter sales. Finally, the data will be calibrated to MCES and additional field meter data as well as lift station runtime and flow meter data. One meeting is planned at the conclusion of the model upgrade to present and discuss calibration data and obtain city buy-in related to the acceptability of model accuracy. deliverables: meeting invitation meeting agenda technical memorandum documenting model construction, including changes made during this upgrade schedule: Modeling updates to be completed by April 15, 2016 cost: $19,120 task 5: risk-related mapping objective: Develop risk-related intermediate map deliverables to help city staff identify the areas of highest vulnerability within the city’s sanitary sewer system. description: This task will consist of using the updated and calibrated XP-SWMM model to develop risk-related maps. The cost estimate assumes that five maps will be developed: one showing vulnerable areas for basement flooding due to sanitary sewer backup (relating pipe inverts to topography) one showing overall pipe capacity (identifies choke points) one showing risk related to failure of a lift station two additional maps based on input from city staff deliverables: five risk-related maps (pdf format) schedule: Task complete by May 13, 2016 cost: $18,120 task 6: scenario modeling objective: Assess the ability of the existing sanitary sewer system to meet future needs. description: The updated model will be used to determine the impact of the potential redevelopment on the existing sanitary sewer system. Six different future demand scenarios will be modeled based on the results of task 3. Each modeled scenario will result in a series of figures depicting the sanitary sewer system. The figures will be color coded to show relative remaining capacity available in each pipe. This task will include one meeting to go over model results. Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 16 deliverables: six figures showing available capacity in the trunk sewers tabulation of results showing percent capacity remaining and SAC units remaining in trunk sewers schedule: Proposed model runs complete by May 27, 2016 cost: $11,060 task 7: preliminary engineering objective: Develop alternatives to meet future development needs. description: It is assumed that some of the proposed future development scenarios will result in surcharged sanitary sewers that will be unacceptable to the city and that the city will want to explore mitigation options. Based on the results of the scenario modeling, options for infrastructure improvements will be created to provide additional capacity in areas where the existing system is undersized. Barr will complete preliminary engineering on the identified improvement options. The design completed will allow for preparation of class 5 cost estimates. It is assumed that five improvement options will be evaluated as a part of the project. Two meetings are assumed during this task, one at the start of the task to identify potential improvement options with city staff and one to receive city input on the draft designs and cost estimates. deliverables: concept-level design of each option (one plan sheet) cost estimate for each option descriptive text as needed for future reporting schedule: Designs and estimates complete by June 24, 2016 cost: $30,140 task 8: project report objective: Document project methodology and results. description: Summarize the potential redevelopment that was identified, methods and results of modeling and scenario development, discussion of preliminary engineering completed, and cost estimates. A draft report will be submitted to the city and, during a follow-up meeting, comments will be received and discussed. Based on the meeting and comments, the report will be updated and a final version submitted to the city. Modifications to the report needed for inclusion in the city’s comprehensive plan will be accomplished under a separate scope of work. deliverables: electronic PDF version of draft report electronic PDF version of final report two paper copies of final report meeting invite, agenda and minutes Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 17 schedule: draft report submitted by July 15, 2016 final report by August 5, 2016 cost: $22,830 timeline and deliverables The table below summarizes the main deliverables and their estimated completion dates. Further discussion of the deliverables is included above in the work plan section. task deliverables est. completion date 1.0 Project initiation Client service plan and meeting minutes November 30, 2015 2.0 Data acquisition Technical memorandum February 26, 2016 3.0 Demand planning Technical memorandum January 31, 2016 4.0 Model update Technical memorandum April 15, 2016 5.0 Risk-related mapping Five maps May 13, 2016 6.0 Scenario modeling Technical memorandum May 27, 2016 7.0 Preliminary engineering Concept-level design and associated cost estimate June 24, 2016 8.0 Project report Draft and final report July 15, 2015 and August 5, 2016 Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 18 cost We believe that our proposed team provides ample capacity to perform the necessary work on this project. The first table below summarizes the key individuals listed in this proposal; they will be supported by additional staff to supplement project work as needed. A detailed cost spreadsheet, which includes hours for all additional support staff, is included in attachment B. A summary of the cost by task is provided in the second table below. Barr team billing rates and anticipated project hours personnel* project role billing rate** anticipated hours Brian LeMon Principal in charge, technical resource, QA/QC $170 83 Sarah Stratton Project manager $145 121 Dan Nesler Technical lead, QA/QC $140 230 Brian Oakley Policy and ordinance lead $160 16 Michael McKinney XP-SWMM modeler $90 250 Patrick Brockamp Civil designer $85 378 Josh Vosejpka GIS specialist $80 146 Gareth Becker CAD technician $85 118 * There are additional hours not summarized in the table that will be completed by support staff. ** Anticipated 2016 billing rates. Work during 2015 will be performed based on existing rates. summary of cost by task task estimated hours labor subtotal expenses total cost 1.0 Project initiation 18 $2,610 $0 $2,610 2.0 Data acquisition 230 $41,745 $500 $42,245 3.0 Demand planning 164 $19,080 $0 $19,080 4.0 Model update 192 $19,120 $0 $19,120 5.0 Risk-related mapping 174 $18,120 $0 $18,120 6.0 Scenario modeling 102 $11,060 $0 $11,060 7.0 Preliminary engineering 292 $29,640 $500 $30,140 8.0 Project report 200 $22,080 $750 $22,830 total 1,372 $163,455 $1,750 $165,205 Barr Engineering Co. │ Page 19 assumptions The cost of task 2 assumes that if data synthesis is needed in place of actual data, it will be billed as an extra cost on a time-and-materials basis. The cost of task 2 assumes that meter data will be obtained by the city and delivered to Barr in a digital format that is reasonably easy to manipulate. The completion date for task 2 assumes that data provided by the MCES and the city will be available by mid-January. The cost of the installation of flow meters in the field for task 2 assumes that 8 flow meters will be installed in the area of redevelopment in southeast Edina and at select locations in the rest of the city for a period of two weeks during this winter. Task 3 assumes that the city will provide Barr with any plans that have been completed to date for redevelopment in Edina. Barr will work with city staff to identify any additional areas that may be redeveloped, development density, and timeline. Task 5 assumes that five risk-related maps will be developed. Task 6 assumes that six scenarios will be identified and modeled. If additional scenarios are developed and require modeling, Barr will work with the city to complete the additional work on time-and-materials basis. Task 7 assumes that five improvement options will be identified as an outcome of task 5. If more than five improvement options are identified, Barr will work with the city to complete the additional conceptual designs and associated cost estimates on a time-and-materials basis. Barr Engineering Co. attachment A: figures 1-RF-491 1-RF-490 1-MN-345 3-BN-499 1-MN-344 1-MN-343 1-MN-342 FLOWS TO1-SLP-470 FLOWS TO1-MN-330 AREA CAN FLOWTO 1-RF-490 OR 1-RF-491 MinneapolisMinneapolis BloomingtonBloomington Eden Eden PrairiePrairie MinnetonkaMinnetonka RichfieldRichfield St. Louis St. Louis ParkPark HopkinsHopkins !;N Ba r r F o o t e r : A r c G I S 1 0 . 3 . 1 , 2 0 1 5 - 1 0 - 1 4 1 6 : 2 5 F i l e : W : \ B u s i n e s s U n i t s \ W R \ P r o p o s a l s \ 2 0 1 5 \ P 1 5 2 . 1 5 C i t y o f E d i n a S a n S e w e r M o d e l - E n g \ s e w e r s h e d s _ 2 0 1 3 1 1 1 4 _ F i g u r e _ f o r _ P r o p o s a l . m x d U s e r : s m s 4,000 0 4,000Feet Figure 1 MAJOR SEWER SHEDS AND OUTLETSSanitary Sewer Model City of EdinaEdina, MN MCES INTERCEPTOR LOCAL SEWER OUTLET LOCAL SEWER PIPE MCES FLOWMETER MCES INTERCEPTOR LABEL1-RF-491 ")G-777G-1962G-1151:81% G-1140:100% G-647:88% G-682:53% G-5331:66% Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (HongKong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013 !;N 0 1,000 2,000 Feet Figure 2 ULTIMATE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTPIPE CAPACITY UTILIZED (%)GrandView RedevelopmentCity of EdinaEdina, MN Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.1, 2014-01-24 16:31 File: I:\Projects\23\27\G13\Maps\SAC Availability\Grandview Redevelopment\Figures\Ultimate Buildout\Figure 6 - Ultimate Planned Development (capacity).mxd User: mbm 1 inch = 1,000 feet 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100 >100 Pipe Capacity Utilized (%) ")LS-09 Sewersheds Existing Sanitary Sewer (LS-09) LS-09 SewershedLS-09 SewershedLS-09 Sewershed LS-09 Barr Engineering Co. attachment B: detailed cost spreadsheet Na m e L e M o n , Br i a n S t r a t t o n , Sa r a h N e s l e r , Da n i e l M cK i n n e y , Mi c h a e O a k l e y , Br y a n B r o c k a m p , Pa t r i c k V o s e j p k a , Jo s h u a B e c k e r , Ga r e t h H u f f m a n , Yv o n n e Ca t e g o r y B K L S M S D A N M B M B T O P E B J R V G W B Y M H Bi l l i n g Ra t e $ 1 7 0 . 0 0 $ 1 4 5 . 0 0 $ 1 4 0 . 0 0 $ 9 0 . 0 0 $ 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 8 5 . 0 0 $ 8 0 . 0 0 $ 8 5 . 0 0 $ 9 0 . 0 0 Pr o j e c t Ro l e P I C P M S e n i o r En g i n e e r En g i n e e r Se n i o r Co n s u l t a n t E n g i n e e r GI S / C A D G I S / C A D S u p p o r t Ta s k 1 ‐ Pr o j e c t In i t a t i o n Mi n n e a p o l i s M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e a p o l i s M i n n e a p o l i s Ki c k of f Me e t i n g 4 6 4 2 2 1 8 2 , 6 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2,610.00 $ Su b t o t a l 46 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 8 2,610.00 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,610.00 $ 2% Ta s k 2 ‐ Da t a Ac q u i s i t i o n MC E S Me t e r Da t a 24 8 14 1 , 5 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1,530.00 $ SC A D A 12 8 11 1 , 1 0 5 . 0 0 $ 1,105.00 $ Wa t e r sa l e s da t a 2 2 8 32 1 6 8 68 6 , 4 3 0 . 0 0 $ 6,430.00 $ Se w e r up d a t e s 2 4 8 8 22 2 , 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 2,210.00 $ Te c h me m o 1 4 4 8 2 2 4 2 5 2 , 7 2 0 . 0 0 $ 2,720.00 $ Me e t i n g 4 4 4 12 1 , 8 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1,820.00 $ Ad d i t i o n a l fl o w me t e r i n g (8 me t e r s ) 4 2 1 6 48 8 78 7 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 $ 500.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 26,430.00 $ Su b t o t a l 11 1 7 4 2 1 6 0 9 6 3 4 1 0 4 2 3 0 2 3 , 7 4 5 . 0 0 $ 500.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 42,245.00 $ 26% Ta s k 3 ‐ De m a n d Pl a n n i n g Id e n t i f y Ar e a s of re d e v e l o p m e n t 24 8 4 18 2 , 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2,680.00 $ De v e l o p sc e n a r i o s 8 4 1 6 32 1 6 8 84 8 , 8 6 0 . 0 0 $ 8,860.00 $ Te c h me m o 2 4 8 16 4 4 2 4 0 4 , 2 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4,240.00 $ Me e t i n g s 6 8 8 22 3 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 3,300.00 $ Su b t o t a l 18 2 0 4 0 0 4 4 8 2 0 1 2 2 1 6 4 1 9 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 19,080.00 $ 12% Ta s k 4 ‐ Mo d e l Up d a t e Up d a t e Ge o m e t r y 44 1 6 8 32 3 , 2 6 0 . 0 0 $ 3,260.00 $ Up d a t e in p u t fl o w 28 3 2 16 58 5 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 $ 5,650.00 $ Ca l i b r a t i o n / Q A Q C 4 2 1 6 4 0 40 102 1 0 , 2 1 0 . 0 0 $ 10,210.00 $ Su b t o t a l 4 8 2 8 8 8 0 6 4 0 0 0 1 9 2 1 9 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 19,120.00 $ 12% Ta s k 5 ‐ Ri s k ‐Re l a t e d Ma p p i n g De v e l o p 4 ri s k ‐re l a t e d ma p s 8 1 6 1 6 4 0 3 2 4 0 8 2 1 6 2 1 6 , 3 0 0 . 0 0 $ 16,300.00 $ Me e t i n g to di s c u s s ma p de l i v e r a b l e s 44 4 12 1 , 8 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1,820.00 $ Su b t o t a l 12 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 3 2 4 0 8 2 1 7 4 1 8 , 1 2 0 . 0 0 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 18,120.00 $ 11% Ta s k 6 ‐ Sc e n a r i o Mo d e l i n g Mo d e l ru n s 44 4 0 48 4 , 7 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4,740.00 $ Te c h me m o 2 4 8 1 6 4 4 2 4 0 4 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 4,320.00 $ Me e t i n g 4 4 4 2 14 2 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2,000.00 $ Su b t o t a l 61 2 1 6 5 8 0 0 4 4 2 1 0 2 11,060.00 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 11,060.00 $ 7% Ta s k 7 ‐ Pr e l i m i n a r y En g i n e e r i n g Pr e l i m En g i n e e r i n g 8 4 1 6 1 6 60 1 6 6 0 180 1 7 , 1 0 0 . 0 0 $ 500.00 $ 17,600.00 $ Co s t es t i m a t e s 2 4 8 32 46 4 , 7 6 0 . 0 0 $ 4,760.00 $ Te c h me m o 2 2 8 4 16 4 4 2 4 2 4 , 3 1 0 . 0 0 $ 4,310.00 $ Me e t i n g s 6 8 8 2 24 3 , 4 7 0 . 0 0 $ 3,470.00 $ Su b t o t a l 18 1 8 4 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 6 4 2 2 9 2 2 9 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 $ 500.00 $ ‐ $ 30,140.00 $ 18% Ta s k 8 ‐ Pr o j e c t Re p o r t Dr a f t re p o r t 4 8 2 0 2 0 8 2 0 2 4 1 6 8 1 2 8 1 3 , 4 2 0 . 0 0 $ 250.00 $ 13,670.00 $ Fi n a l re p o r t 2 8 1 6 8 2 84 4 8 6 0 6,840.00 $ 500.00 $ 7,340.00 $ Me e e t i n g 4 4 4 12 1 , 8 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1,820.00 $ Su b t o t a l 10 2 0 4 0 2 8 1 0 2 8 2 8 2 0 1 6 2 0 0 2 2 , 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 750.00 $ ‐ $ 22,830.00 $ 14% Pr o j e c t Su b t o t a l 83 1 2 1 2 3 0 2 5 0 1 6 3 7 8 1 4 6 1 1 8 3 0 1 3 7 2 1 4 5 , 4 5 5 . 0 0 $ 1,750.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 165,205.00 $ Pr o j e c t To t a l 165,205.00 $ Pr o j e c t N a m e : E d i n a S a n i t a r y S e w e r M o d e l i n g a n d P l a n n i n g Cl i e n t N a m e : C i t y o f E d i n a Da t e : 1 1 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 Ap p r o v e d b y : B K L Percentage of TotalSubtotal Labor E x p e n s e s Sub ContractorsProject TotalSubtotal Hours Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Traf f ic Saf ety Report of October 7, 2015 Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Review and approve the Traf f ic Safety Report of October 7, 2015. INT RODUCT ION: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the October 7, 2015 Traffic Safety Report at their October 22 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. AT TACHMENT S: Description Traffic safety Committee Report of October 7, 2015 October 22, 2015 Draft ETC Minutes Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 1 of 10 Map : 70th Street roundabouts in question, the stars mark the crosswalks Map : Transition from 49th Street to Westbrook Lane Traffic Safety Report October 07, 2015 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 07. The Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, City Engineer, Public Works Director, and Police Sergeant were in attendance for the meeting. The Assistance City Planner has been contacted with the report and results and asked for input. Section A : Items on which staff recommends action A1. Request for increased pedestrian safety at the 70th Street roundabouts A requestor asked for an investigation into pedestrian safety at the 70th Street roundabouts, between York Avenue and France Avenue. Specifically, the requestor asked for an investigation of distracted driving in this location. In two studies rates of distracted driving of 15 and 22 percent were found, with the lower number being from the sidewalk directly next to the road, and the higher being from a nearby parking lot. Cell phone use, eating, and playing with the radio were three common distractions which removed drivers’ eyes from the roadway. While a full yielding study has not been done, drivers yielded to pedestrians and the Traffic Safety Coordinator in crossings but often did not wait until pedestrians had fully cleared the lane to continue. July’s Focus In campaign by the Edina Police Department was crosswalk safety, and September’s Focus In campaign was on distracted driving. There have been no reported crashes between motor vehicle drivers, and pedestrians or bicyclists along the 70th Street roundabouts since their installation. After review, staff recommends that this item be approved. The police department already enforces these infractions and these locations and data will help in their enforcement, further, the crosswalks are being remarked with more durable thermoplastic. A2. Request for further discussion of 49th Street and Westbrook Lane A requestor asked for clarification on why the stop sign on 49th Street, as it turns from east-west to north-south and becomes Westbrook Lane, was removed. The sign was removed in 2010 as there is no intersection in this location. The sign had been placed years earlier to prevent people from rounding the corner at a high rate of speed Photo : A woman crosses in the 70th Street crosswalks Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 2 of 10 or drifting to the wrong side of the roadway, it was removed as part of a traffic safety request which also had a staff recommendation of adding a centerline to the roadway. This was not placed, but may have been due to now lost revisions of the report. Centerlines may be warranted in specific locations by the MNMUTCD under the option which reads, “On roadways without continuous center line pavement markings, short sections may be marked with centerline pavement markings to control the position of traffic at specific locations, such as around curves … and at bridges.” No accidents attributable to this condition have been reported since the removal of the sign. After review, staff recommends this item for approval. Centerline striping will be added to the curve, which is compliant with standards used elsewhere in the city. A3. Request for further intersection control at the intersection of Parkwood Road and Schaefer Road This requestor believes that the intersection of Parkwood Road and Schaefer Road is dangerous due to the high number of crashes recorded in this location. Five (5) crashes have occurred at this location in the past five (5) years, with four (4) being right-angle crashes, which are considered susceptible to correction with all-way stop control, three of these crashes have involved eastbound and southbound vehicles which is consistent with the requestor’s observation that drivers on these approaches cannot see each other. Eastbound and westbound traffic at this location has a stop sign to control entrances to the intersection; the northbound and southbound approaches are uncontrolled. While the requestor sees this intersection as an issue, removal of the hedges on the northwest corner of the intersection is not seen as a positive solution and the requestor would prefer that they remain and continue with the dangerous condition than have their removal. These hedges are also only questionably in the intersection clearview area of the intersection. Parkwood Road, east of this intersection has an ADT of 350 and has an 85th-percentile speed of 30.5 mph. Schaeffer Road has an ADT of 885 and has an 85th-percentile speed of 34.1 mph. After review, staff recommends that this intersection be controlled by an all-way stop. This recommendation considered the high incidence of crashes in this location, in particular, the incidence of crashes compared to the lower volumes seen on these roadways. Sight distance obstructions were seen to be beyond Edina’s Right-Of-Way in this area, as well as beyond the intersection clearview area. Photo : 49th Street at Westbrook Lane looking east Photo : Parkwood Road and Schaeffer Avenue, looking north Map : Schaeffer Road and Parkwood Road Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 3 of 10 Map : Gleason Road and Schey Drive, Dewey Hill Road runs along the bottom of this map A4. Request for crosswalks at the intersection of Grimes Avenue and Sunnyside Road This request has been considered in 2012 and was denied at that time for a lack of warrants. Upcoming construction in the area was seen as warranting further investigation. A camera study was taken of the area, and found that there were, at maximum nineteen (19) crossings in a two-hour period across the northern leg of the intersection, including at least 6 crossings which were from maintenance workers in the area, crossing from a workspace to a vehicle. The western leg of the intersection had a maximum of ten (10) crossings in a two-hour period, and also had several crossings by workmen. The eastern leg of the intersection had thirteen (13) crossings in a two- hour period. No crashes related to pedestrians have occurred in this location in the past ten years. Grimes Avenue is stop controlled at this intersection, and has an ADT of 976, with an 85th- percentile speed of 26.7 mph. Sunnyside Avenue is uncontrolled at this location and has an 85th- percentile speed of 30.3 mph and an ADT of 2910. After review, marked crosswalks are recommended for approval at all three legs of the intersection. This intersection is being reconstructed in 2016, incorporating several traffic calming techniques. These marked crosswalks are seen as an integral part of the intersection’s reconstruction, which along with curb extensions will increase pedestrian friendliness and safety. The calming improvements are considered warranted due to the high volume of traffic on Sunnyside Avenue and Grimes Avenue (they are both local connector statuses in the city’s Living Streets plan) and the history of traffic safety requests at this intersection. Section B : Items staff recommends for denial B1. Request for making a safer intersection at the intersection of Gleason and Schey Drive A resident requested that the City of Edina consider solutions to improve safety at the intersection of Gleason Road and Schey Drive. The requestor notes that many people run the stop sign in this location and feels that this is unsafe. The requestor would also like to decrease noise, and decrease speeds along all of Gleason Road. 2014 traffic counts showed an ADT of 84 on Schey Drive and 1,924 on Gleason Road near this location. 85th-percentile speeds on Schey Drive were seen as 25.8 mph, and as 32.7 Map : Sunnyside Road and Grimes Avenue Photo : Sunnyside Road and Grimes Avenue, looking east Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 4 of 10 Photo : 74th Street at Ohm’s Lane, looking east Map : 74th Street and Ohm’s Lane, Public Works is the white roof in the south of the map Photo : Tracy Avenue and McGuire Drive, looking north Photo : Gleason Road and Schey Drive, looking southeast on Gleason Road. No crashes have been reported in this location in the past ten years. After review, staff recommends denial of this request. A lack of crashes in this location as well as a lack of merit for removals of stop signs, which was a suggested solution by the requestor, was the main reasons that staff considered for this decision. B2. Request for a “Signal Your Turn” sign on 74th Street for left turns onto Ohm’s Lane A requestor asked that a “Signal Your Turn” sign be placed on 74th Street, for eastbound traffic, as it approaches Ohm’s Lane. In an hour long audit of the intersection, of 50 left turns from 74th Street to Ohm’s Lane, six (6) drivers failed to signal, and five (5) additional drivers did not signal 100 feet or more from the intersection, as required by Minnesota law. In the opposite direction, there were only 39 right turns, with five (5) drivers failing to signal, and eight (8) drivers signaling within 100 feet of the intersection. There have been no reported crashes at this intersection in the last ten years. After review, staff recommends denial of this decision. Reasoning included that this was not seen as a pressing safety issue, and the ninety degree turn is not the typical application of this signage. B3. Request for a crosswalk across Tracy Avenue, at McGuire Road This request comes from a resident who wishes to access McGuire Park and other community amenities from the east, and believes that vehicles on Tracy Avenue are unobservant of pedestrians and often exceed the speed limit. A crosswalk is believed by the requestor to bring attention to pedestrians and highlight the crossing. In a video study, a maximum of 12 crossings were observed in a two-hour period. This does not meet the volume warrants for a crosswalk to be placed. Tracy Avenue is classified in this location as a local connector, and carries a higher amount of traffic than its neighboring streets. There have Map : Tracy Avenue and McGuire Drive, 70th Street is on the southern edge, and Antrim Road is on the western edge of this map Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 5 of 10 Map : Concord Avenue as it intersects Lexington Avenue been no reported crashes at this location in the last ten years. Historic counts indicate Tracy Avenue has a volume of about 1,500 in this location, with an 85th-percentile speed of approximately 32 mph. After review, the number of crossings observed did not approach the number required for warranting a crosswalk, and other safety issues did not present themselves in the analysis or video study. B4. Request for slowing traffic through the intersection of Concord Avenue and Lexington Avenue This request regards the offset intersection of Concord Avenue and Lexington Avenue. The requestor believes that a large amount of traffic travelling on Concord Avenue continues on Concord Avenue, requiring two turns in short succession. The volume of this section was seen in 2012 to be 243 vehicles from 5 AM to 10 PM, a video study from this summer confirmed this number. Further, the 85-th percentile speeds on Lexington Avenue between Concord Avenue and Concord Avenue were seen as 16.8 mph and 19 mph in the 2012 study, and a radar study this year, respectively. All approaches to this intersection are uncontrolled. This intersection is scheduled for reconstruction next year. There have been no reported crashes in this location for the last ten years. After review, staff recommends this item for denial. This recommendation is based off of the low volumes and speeds observed through this segment. Further, a 2016 summer reconstruction of the area will reduce street widths and add curbs to the streets, calming traffic without further changes. Photo : Concord Avenue and Lexington Avenue, looking east Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 6 of 10 Photo : Vernon Avenue, where a crosswalk is being investigated Section C : Items on which staff recommends further study C1. Request for a crosswalk across Vernon Avenue at the entrance to Jerry’s Foods This request concerns a large number of elderly persons who are crossing Vernon Avenue at the entrance to Jerry’s Foods as opposed to nearby signalized intersections. Vernon Avenue is a county road, and thus, this recommendation will be forwarded to the county for their consideration. Vernon Avenue is a minor arterial. In a video study, a maximum of 16 crossings were observed in a two-hour period. There have been no reported crashes between pedestrians and drivers of motor vehicles in the past ten years. After review, staff recommends waiting for the results of the upcoming Grandview District Transportation Study, which will include recommended pedestrian improvements in the area. C2. Request for moving, alteration, or removal of the 30 mph speed limit sign from Valley View Road, east of Antrim Road This request comes from a resident who lives within the area designated for a school speed zone, where Valley View Road’s speed limit is reduced to 20 mph when children are present. However, two blocks (nearly 650 feet) before the school speed limit zone ends, there is a sign stating that the speed limit is 30 mph. The requestor believes that this makes for a confusing situation, especially for emerging skill drivers, who Map : Valley View Road and Antrim Road, red is the school speed limit area, the 30 mph speed limit sign is marked with a star. Photos : These photos illustrate the order of the signage along Valley View Road, the requestor would like to move the Speed Limit 30 sign such that it is not within the school speed zone. Map : Vernon Avenue at Jerry’s Foods Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 7 of 10 may not be aware that they are still in the school speed zone. The requestor believes that this will also assist the movement of vehicles into and out of the driveway of the requestor’s residence on Valley View Road. A similar situation can be seen on Normandale Rd, in front of Our Lady of Grace church. No crashes have been reported during school release or start times in the last ten years along this stretch of roadway. The 85th-percentile speed of this section of Valley View Road is 38.1 mph and Valley View Road has an ADT of 7543 in this segment. After review, staff recommended further study on the lawfulness and placement of the school speed zone at this distance from the school property, and to consider changing the school zone itself instead of the signage currently in place. Section D : Other items handled by traffic safety D1. A person called with concerns about the speed of traffic on Division Street and asked for what could be done immediately for lowering traffic speeds. The requestor was informed of the item in the August Traffic Safety Report, and told that enforcement efforts were targeting those who were speeders in the area. Further, the requestor was informed of ways that residents could calm traffic themselves, such as parking on the street. D2. A requestor called engineering to investigate the RRFB at 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue, as it was not flashing long enough for the requestor to cross, and was not stopping vehicles quickly enough. The crossing was measured and a crossing time was computed. This was sent to Hennepin County, which increased the crossing time allotted from 30 to 40 seconds. Further, the Traffic Safety Coordinator is investigating the design of the RRFBs in this location, as there is a pedestrian island in this location, but all RRFBs light up when a pedestrian actuates the crossing. D3. A requestor from Dewey Hill Road wanted to see if reflector strips could be added to Dewey Hill Road’s stop signs with Shannon Lane, as Dewey Hill Road is east-west in this location, and the requestor was concerned that the setting sun prevented westbound drivers from seeing the stop sign. D4. A requestor asked for an investigation into light timings at the Northbound TH 100 exit ramps at 70th Street, stating that TH 100 had too long of a green. This was forwarded to MnDOT, after a short investigation showed that the period of light timings was close to accurate as described by the requestor. D5. A requestor asked for moving some “No Parking” signs further from her driveway, to ensure that people do not park close to her driveway, as the City Code prevents parking within five feet of a driveway. This request has been forwarded to Hennepin County, for these signs to be placed further from the driveway to ensure that the resident can leave her driveway. Additionally, the resident was advised to call the police non-emergency line, which was also provided, to ask for enforcement of this issue when it arises. D6. A requestor asked for a speed study on Malibu Drive, an earlier request with a similar study was completed and the data was forwarded to the requestor. D7. A request for painting of Blake Road, at Interlachen Boulevard was fielded after Blake Road had a minor resurfacing. No action was taken specific to this request, as the road was being marked out for painting at this time. The road has been painted to completion at this time. Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 8 of 10 D8. A requestor asked for the removal of loading zone signage on Edgebrook Place, as the resident who it was installed for has since passed and the loading zone is not needed. A quick review found that this requestor was the original requestor for the signage, and thus the request was forwarded to the sign shop for removal when possible. Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 9 of 10 Appendix A: Crosswalk Warrants A. Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. B. Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has 20 or more pedestrian crossings in a two-hour period. C. Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the “Vehicle Gap Time”. This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: 1) More than five gaps – pavement marking and signage only. 2) Less than five gaps – add actuated pedestrian signals. D. Crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 mph unless in conjunction with signalization. E. Other conditions that warrant crosswalks: 1) Routes to schools 2) Locations adjacent to libraries, community centers, and other high use public facilities. 3) Locations adjacent to public parks. 4) Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons cross a street. 5) Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street. F. Crosswalks will only be placed at intersections. Traffic Safety Committee Report of October 07, 2015 Page 10 of 10 Appendix B: Stop Sign Warrants When it is determined that a full stop is always required on an approach to an intersection a STOP (R1- 1) sign shall be used. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs. The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction with the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users from the minor street failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. Additional warrants which do not specify the type of control are as follows; A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C. An un-signalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more the 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Additional warrants from the city of Edina list that: 1. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 2. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. 3. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. 4. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 5. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 6. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Council Chambers October 22, 2015, 6:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Bass called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Bass, Ding, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Loeffelholz, Nelson, Olson, Ruehl, and Spanhake. Absent at roll call was member Boettge. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Spanhake approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Janovy approving the Sept. 17 minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. VII.B. Traffic Safety Report of October 7, 2015 A.1. Planner Nolan explained that the distracted driver study was the traffic safety coordinator observing and documenting what drivers were doing. Chair Bass requested that this information be added to the appendix in the future. Regarding the vegetation, Planner Nolan said it is not an issue for drivers but could be for pedestrians so staff will evaluate further. He said based on feedback from other roundabouts in the cities of Minneapolis and Richfield, staff did not plan to move the crosswalk. A.2. This section will be revised to clarify that adding a centerline was the recommendation. B.1. Planner Nolan stated he was not aware of warrants for stop sign removal. Two improvement suggestions were made: 1) consider moving stop sign to the other side of the street – difficult to see because of tree; 2) good location for a traffic calming circle. C.1. It was noted that this was an example of why observational data is important because pedestrians will cross wherever it is most convenient for them. Planner Nolan clarified that the Grandview Study will begin immediately and some implementations will be short term and others long term. C.2. Planner Nolan said staff was reviewing a school speed zone study that was done previously. Change ‘Antrim’ to ‘St. Patrick’s.’ D.5. Change ‘state statute’ to ‘city code.’ Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to forward the amended Oct. 7, 2015, TSC report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request f or Purchase: Engineering Services f or Valley View Rd Bike Lane Extension Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Authorize City Manager to sign professional services proposal with Alliant Engineering. INT RODUCT ION: Edina’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan identif ies Valley View Road underneath highway 62 as a primary bike route. This project will complete preliminary engineering or 30% design to continue those f acilities south to West 66th Street. It will be f unded by the Centennial Lakes TIF District. AT TACHMENT S: Description Request for Purchase Engineering Services for Valley View Rd Bike Lane Extension Alliant Engineering Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 November 17, 2015 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Request for Purchase: Engineering Services for Valley View Rd Bike Lane Extension November 6, 2015 N/A Alliant Engineering $34,230 Recommended Quote or Bid: Alliant Engineering Information/Background: Edina’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies Valley View Road underneath Highway 62 as a primary bike route. Recall the 2012 Bike Boulevard Project created bike lanes to just north of the Highway 62 bridge. This project will complete preliminary engineering or 30% design to continue those facilities south to West 66th Street. By having 30% design documents completed, the City is in a much better position to apply for grant monies that become available for the installation of these improvements. Alliant Engineering completed the previous Bike Boulevard project. That project completed some analysis of this area that they can use as a starting point for this work effort. Funding for the project will be utilized from the Centennial Lakes TIF District. Staff recommends approving the proposal with Alliant Engineering. G:\ENG\CONST\IMPRS\A265 SE Bike & Ped Impr\ADMIN\MISC\RFP VV Rd Bike Ln Extension_CC.docx Memorandum TO: Chad Millner, P.E. City of Edina FROM: Mike Anderson, P.E., PTOE Steve Weser, P.E. Alliant Engineering, Inc. DATE: November 6, 2015 SUBJECT: Valley View Road – Bike Lane Extension Proposal ____________________________________________________________ As requested, Alliant Engineering (Alliant) has prepared a proposal for the preparation of a 30% preliminary engineering layout for the extension of bike lanes between TH 62 and 66th Street along Valley View Road. Project Understanding Based on discussions with the City of Edina on October 23, 2015 the following improvements will serve as the Scope of Work for this proposal: • Provide an 8 foot off street trail below the TH 62 Bridge (both sides) with connection to the existing on street bike lanes to the north. The bridge abutments will be modified to remove the slope and provide a vertical wall between the abutment and pier to create space. Bridge abutment design is not included as part of the scope of work. • The northbound bike lane will be either on street between 66th Street and 65th Street (removal of one northbound through lane) or off street via widening of the existing sidewalk. Potential pork chop and westbound free right turn lane modifications at Valley View Road/66th Street may be required. • The southbound bike lane will either cross perpendicular to the free right turn exit ramp from TH 62 to southbound Valley View Road onto an off street trail that will then follow Valley View Road until it crosses the pond via a new bridge; or be on street to 66th Street. • MnDOT has planned ADA improvements at the Valley View Road/65th Street and Valley View Road/TH 62 North Ramp intersections. The preliminary design will be compatible with those improvements to the extent feasible. Valley View Road Scope of Work November 6, 2015 Page 2 Scope of Work Task 1.0 Document Existing Conditions 1.1 Compile and review record plans - (The City of Edina shall provide asbuilts for City sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer.) Alliant will contact MnDOT to acquire record plan information as applicable. . 1.2 Request Gopher State One Call locates and mapping and add information into the project base mapping files. 1.3 Collect a field survey of the corridor (surface features, trees, utility locate markings, curbs, lane markings, etc.). 1.4 Update topographic file and develop project base mapping in microstation format 1.5 Field review of existing conditions. 1.6 Traffic counts – Alliant will collect one day peak AM and PM hour turning movement counts at the following intersections: - Eastbound TH 62 to Valley View Road exit ramp - 66th Street and Valley View Road Task 1.0 Assumptions 1) Topographic information and existing survey data will be provided by the City of Edina. Based on the availability and quality of this information, the amount of additional field survey work will be identified. 2) Our scope does not include utility meetings or coordination. 3) Right of way verification is not included. Task 2.0 Conceptual Design 2.1 Traffic Operations Analysis – Preform high level evaluation of Valley View Road/65th Street and 66th Street intersections to determine feasibility to remove travel lanes, reduce free right turn movement speeds or to remove free right turn movement. Results of this analysis will be discussed with City of Edina and MnDOT prior to proceeding on any potential concept layout work that modifies the Valley View Road/65th Street intersection geometrics. 2.2 Concept Sketches–Develop concept sketch alternatives to illustrate the couple different options in connecting the bike lanes to 66th Street. Concept sketches will be high level and be for discussion purpose prior to developing the preliminary layout. Task 3.0 Preliminary Layout 3.1 Prepare 30% preliminary layout of the preferred bike lane and off-street trail configurations. Deliverable will be a full colorized layout overlaid on inplace aerial or topography and will show all design elements and typical sections. 3.2 Identify utility relocates. The utility conflicts will be only noted at this time and no coordination is assumed. 3.3 Autoturn Analysis – Run autoturn analysis on the preferred intersection geometrics where applicable. 3.4 Prepare Engineers Estimate – Prepare quantity take off and 30% Engineer’s Estimate of construction costs based on the design layout. Task 3.0 Assumptions Valley View Road Scope of Work November 6, 2015 Page 3 1) This proposal does not include any efforts associated with the acquisition of right-of-way or easements. If right-of-way is needed, areas will be denoted on the preliminary layout. 2) This proposal assumes no environmental investigation efforts associated with, but not limited to, wetland impacts, wetland mitigation, historical properties, endangered species, socio/economic studies, etc. 3) Software to be utilized on the project include Bentley MicroStation, Bentley GEOPAK, Transoft AutoTurn, and Microsoft Office titles. 4) This proposal assumes the additional impervious area as a result of the improvements is less than one (1) acre. As a result, this proposal does not include the design of additional stormwater treatment facilities. 5) Cost estimating will include an estimation of storm sewer and public utility relocation costs based on available record plans and field reviews. The conceptual design effort will not include detailed pavement spread and pipe capacity analyses. Storm sewer construction costs included in the Engineer’s Estimate will be based on engineering judgment upon review of the record plans and field reviews. 6) Cost estimate for structural work and modifications to the bridge abutments at TH 62 will be provided by others. Task 4.0 Project Management and Meetings 4.1 Meetings • Project Team Meeting – Alliant will meet with City of Edina staff to discuss concepts and preliminary design layout. (Assume three meeting) • Meeting with City of Edina and MnDOT discuss potential concepts relating to the Valley View Road/65th Street intersection. (Assume one meeting) 4.2 Project management and miscellaneous coordination • Project documentation and invoicing Task 4.0 Assumptions This task does not include public involvement, City Council, or other City committee meeting attendance. Project Schedule The following project schedule milestone dates are anticipated: • Authorization to Begin: November 16, 2015 • Traffic Ops and Concept Sketches: December 18, 2015 • 30% Layout: February 29, 2015 • Final Submittal: March 28, 2015 Attachments Attachment A – Project Hour Estimate Attachment A – Project Hour Estimate November 6, 2015 Page 4 Staff Hour and Cost Estimate Task Description Dollars Project Manager Project Engineer Data Collector Survey Crew TEAM TOTAL TASK TOTAL 1.0 Document Existing Conditions 10 71 20 40 141 13,690.00 1.1 Compile and Review Record Plans 2 4 0 0 6 640.00 1.2 Gopher One Call and Mapping 1 16 0 0 17 1,580.00 1.3 Field Survey 1 24 0 40 65 7,500.00 1.4 Topo File and Base Mapping 2 16 0 0 18 1,720.00 1.5 Field Reivew 4 8 0 0 12 1,280.00 1.6 Traffic Counts 0 3 20 0 23 970.00 2.0 Conceptual Design 6 32 0 0 38 3,720.00 2.1 Traffic Operation Analysis 2 8 0 0 10 1,000.00 2.2 Concept Sketches 4 24 0 0 28 2,720.00 3.0 Preliminary Layout 33 116 0 0 149 15,060.00 3.1 30% Preliminary Layout (Sheets) 24 96 0 0 120 12,000.00 3.2 Identify Utility Relocates 4 4 0 0 8 920.00 3.3 Autoturn Analysis 1 4 0 0 5 500.00 3.4 SEQ and Engineer Estimate 4 12 0 0 16 1,640.00 4.0 Meetings 10 4 0 0 14 1,760.00 4.1 Project Team Meetings (4) 8 4 0 0 12 1,480.00 4.2 Project Management 2 0 0 0 2 280.00 PROJECT TOTAL 59 223 20 40 342 34,230.00 Hours Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Debra Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Jan Callison, Hennepin County Commissioner Information CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: INT RODUCT ION: Hennepin County Commissioner Callison has asked f or a few minutes to update the Council. Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Grandview District Transportation Study Information CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: None. INT RODUCT ION: Please recall that at its Oct 20, 2015 meeting City Council approved a request for purchase with LHB, Inc. for the Grandview District Transportation Study. On Nov 2 LHB and the Project Management Team (PMT) held a kick-of f meeting to begin the project. The PMT consists of staff f rom the engineering, administration and planning departments, as well as representatives from the Transportation and Planning Commissions. The community engagement process for the Study will begin with an intensive “Convene Week” intended to help stakeholders develop a shared understanding of the Transportation Study’s place in the larger set of ef f orts around the Grandview District. I t is an opportunity to reconnect with the outcomes of previous planning processes, reassess existing conditions, and develop a deeper understanding of the transportation system’s role in guiding public and private investments in the area. During Convene Week, there are three key opportunities for the public to connect with the process. First, there will be brief presentation to the City Council on Nov 17 at 7:00pm at Edina City Hall. Next there will be a public workshop on Nov 18 at 6:00pm at the Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility. Finally, there will be a wrap-up presentation for the week’s efforts at the Transportation Commission meeting on Nov 19 at 6:00pm at Edina City Hall. Of these meetings, the Nov 18 public workshop will be the only meeting where public comments will be taken regarding the Study. Michael Fischer, project principal f rom the LHB, Inc. consultant team will lead a brief presentation to introduce the goals and process of the Study. Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: V.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Speak Up, Edina October Discussion I nf ormation CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Receive the October 2015 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion report about parks, recreation and programming. INT RODUCT ION: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions f rom residents. One of the City Council’s six strategic priorities for 2014-2015 is Communication and Engagement: “To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningf ul and interactive communication.” A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUpEdina.org. I n October 2015, the discussion topic centered on parks, recreation and programming. The City has more than 30 neighborhood parks around the city, each unique in its own way with dif f erent amenities. Throughout the year, but primarily in the summer, the Parks & Recreation Department offers a variety of programming opportunities f rom Fab 4 & 5, Summer Playgrounds and sports camps to art classes, tennis lessons and adaptive recreation. In this discussion, the City posed the f ollowing questions: What do you think about Edina's neighborhood parks? What park amenities do you like and what do you think could be added or improved? What do you think about the Parks & Recreation Department's current of f erings or programming? W hat classes and activities would you like to see added in the f uture? The discussion was open f or comments between Sept. 24 and Nov. 9. During that time, 90 comments were made. Additionally, 864 users visited the site 1,112 times, garnering 4,273 page views. All but one participant in this discussion were from Edina. Attached are the comments f or the discussion. AT TACHMENT S: Description Comments Comments from NextDoor or, Sig% Connedti U Sign Up Like Tweeti I Share n SHARE your feedback! n POST your ideas! n JOIN the discussion! 11/10/2015 City of Edina City of Edina • Home • Discussions Sigh ftirums • ideas • Meetings Email Surreys 'email address... Panwnhmiage I password... This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Parks, Recreation and Pro2ramming The City has more than 30 neighborhood parks around the city, each unique in its own way with different amenities. Throughout the year, but primarily in the summer, the Parks & Recreation Department offers a variety of programming opportunities from Fab 4 & 5, Summer Playgrounds and sports camps to art classes, tennis lessons and adaptive recreation. 90 Answers 3 Topics View Discussion Topic: Parks Closed 2015-11-09 What do you think about Edina's neighborhood parks? 15 Responses 15 Responses Joel Stegner, Community volunteer 25 days ago They are of course very nice, but a few comments. Calling them neighborhood parks might suggest then are "owned" or exclusive to the neighbor. They are in fact small city parks. Second, they should all have signage, parking for cars and bikes, benches and at least one picnic table. Not just places for walking through or playing team sports. Probably also more bathrooms, pavilions and grills. 3 Supports Reply to Joel Stegner I comment... http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-program ming/topics/parks 1/7 11/10/2015 City of Edina Mary Wiley 25 days ago Our lovely local park would probably get more use if there were bathroom facilities. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Mary Wiley .lay Halvorson 24 days ago There should be a playground at Van Valkenburg Park. The northwestern most area of Edina has NO playground within a mile in Edina. The closest playground for us is to cross over 169, go down a steep dirt and treed embankment, and into Hopkins several blocks. In the Hopkins neighborhood there are two nice playgrounds 2 blocks apart. I also believe this playground should be accessible or of Universal Design to meet the needs of all children in the community. 2 Supports comment... % Reply to Jay Halvorson Shelley Ch 23 days ago I appreciate the city asking, and think parks are a very important asset to this community. Our parks should be one of the best things about the city of Edina. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Shelley Ch 1r; Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman 22 days ago Our large parks are amazing i.e. Pamela. Love it! But, I would like to see more small, "pocket parks" scattered in the residential areas. For example, St. John's park is a great space, and a great location, but is literally nothing but a blank space. It's great for pick-up games, which is nice since lots in this area are very small, but it would also be nice to use a small comer of the park for a playground, splash pad pad, those cool outdoor exercise systems, (teams run by the park all the time during after school practice and could totally incorporate that) benches.. .something to make it more of a gathering spot. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/parks 2ll Reply to Jeff Northrup comment... 4 comment... 11/10/2015 City of Edina Jeff Northrup at November 06,2015 at 9:37am CST The growth of "rectangular field sports" in America has created unique problems for our parks. But one of the biggest issues is the lack of opportunities for "newer" activities or "less organized" offerings. I think a very inexpensive, but high yielding, opportunity for our parks is to find all the "nearly-level" green space and level and irrigate it. The case study of Pamela Park is a great one. That land between the lighted fields and the playground was nearly level, but it was not irrigated and had numerous and dangerous pot holes. Now it is level and has irrigation. That precious, level, green space can now be used in more ways than it could before - with minimal expense. And it is safe. Now it can be used for anything from flying a kite to girl's rugby to ultimate frisbee to pre-k soccer to walking your dog. We are not talking massive "fields initiatives" either. Any nearly-level space can be improved by simply making it level. By the time they are completed, most people would not be able to see a major difference. But the usability of those parks would increase ten-fold. There are numerous other parks in Edina where a little leveling and irrigation would expand our ability to maximize these awesome neighborhood parks. 0 Supports Erica Ziegler at November 06,2015 at 9:43am CST I'd like to see parks updated in a more timely manner. If there isn't funds for it, perhaps guiding residents on how they can raise funds in order to update their local park. Edina could also use a splash pad and an indoor waterpark would be amazing. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Erica Ziegler Jim Vandervelde at November 06,2015 at 1:51pm CST Walnut Ridge Park is wonderful and the path around it is heavily used by walkers and pet owners. A few lights around the perimeter of the walking path would be very welcomed by visitors and increase safety. 0 Supports Reply to Jim Vandetvelde Laura Kondrick at November 06, 2015 at 3:27pm CST Lights do not increase safety and contribute to light pollution. Bring a flashlight like I do. I do not understand why the city is not better funding the parks and ree department. Their budget is so small. BUCKTHORN Also, city council has been a tenible steward of our woods and wildlife in our parks. The lack of funds for buckthorn removal is appalling. A church volunteer group came and cleared buckthorn around the Bredesen park entrance. I feel that the city has a bricks and mortar http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/parks 3/7 11/10/2015 City of Edina approach to land development and that is where they are putting our money, but there are substantial grants available if applied for. The Park Board also is heavily weighted towards bricks and mortar in my opinion. Our city has to step to improve the most valuable assets of our parks - the wildlife ,the woods, marshes, creeks ponds, meadows and sloughs. Buckthorn crowds out native plants and deprives wildlife of habitat. Playgrounds - I walk Walnut Ridge almost every day at different times and do not see many kids using the playground equipment. It looks like some nannies take the kids out, but not in large numbers. I can't remember the last time I say any grade school or middle school kids in the park, not even when the ice rink is up. I think it would be good to have some usage measurement so we can assess needs. I would like a playground for adults with rigging, rock climbing, etc I Support comment... 4 Reply to Laura Kondrick Laura Kondrick at November 06,2015 at 3:30pm CST Build more pickle ball courts. Tennis is on the wane and pickle ball is the fasting growing sport in the US. Or convert tennis courts to pickle ball courts. I see very low usage of tennis courts these days. 0 Supports Icomment... Reply to Laura Kondrick Audre Gaer at November 06,2015 at 3:54pm CST One day when I was babysitting my grandson last summer I arranged a playdate with two of my friends with their young children at Lake Cornelia Park playground. They are both residents of Minneapolis and use those facilities regularly. We were all very unimpressed with the run down nature of the equipment. Many of the wooden boards were rough and splintery. One board was completely loose and kids were playing with it. I think before money is spent on adding facilities older equipment should be repaired and made safe. 3 Supports comment... Reply to Audre Gaer Cyd P at November 07, 2015 at 10:22am CST It feels like the emphasis in the past 10 years has been on the REC and not on the PARK of "park and rec". Pamela Park was at one time a wetlands. The pond is still home to a variety of wildlife rarely seen in an urban area. When we first moved here, there were pheasants in the park! That natural treasure has now been covered in a plastic playing field, metal fencing, blaring lights that stay on until 11:00 pm, an asphalt ribbon smack dab through the middle of it, and a huge parking lot with cars roaring in and out by the dozens. Buckthorn has taken over most of the plant life. The Fred golf course, which was already a "manufactured green space" could easily have been turned into sports playing fields instead, and Pamela could have been converted into a nature restoration area that school kids could have visited on field trips and the neighborhood could have used to teach our kids about nature. Let's put more "PARK" back into Park and Rec. I Support 4 http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/parks 417 comment... 11/10/2015 City of Edina Reply to Cyd P. Elizabeth Gorman at November 08,2015 at 9:10pm CST I would like to see improvements to Bredesen trails and Creek Valley playing fields so they are not so prone to flooding. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Elizabeth Gorman Jeff Northrup at November 09,2015 at 11:28am CST Pamela Park is now one of our city's gems. It is magnificent. The transformation of Pamela should be held as a beacon of what successful investment looks like. I haven't seen kids playing "pick up" sports in a long time - not until this summer at Pamela. Daily there were kids out there on the turf running, catching, throwing, kicking, using their muscles, getting exercise. What a blessing to see kids leaving their screens behind and enjoying the outdoors. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jeff Northrup Barbara La Valleur at November 09,2015 at 12:39pm CST We are blessed to have a wonderful park system. I'd love to see more artistic yet functional items like bike racks, benches, art murals and mosaics and clever playground equipment in our parks. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Barbara La Valleur Sign Up Connect email address... Sign Up Participants http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/parks 5/7 City of Edina 11/10/2015 City of Edina Home • Discussions Sigh fr-11-1 • hAus. • Meetings ▪ Surveys Email email address... Pasw n 'password... or, Simko, with: Comnetjen Uo Sign Up I Sign In -I Like 0 Tweeti I Share 0+1 o _1_1 w Trvirvi EdiBa n SHARE your feedback! 1 POST your ideas! 0 JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Parks, Recreation and Programming The City has more than 30 neighborhood parks around the city, each unique in its own way with different amenities. Throughout the year, but primarily in the summer, the Parks & Recreation Department offers a variety of programming opportunities from Fab 4 & 5, Summer Playgrounds and sports camps to art classes, tennis lessons and adaptive recreation. 3 Topics 90 Answers Closed 2015-11-09 View Discussion Topic: Park Improvements? What park amenities do you like and what do you think could be added or improved? 64 Responses 64 Responses t-; - Kristan Frend 25 days ago I think Edina's parks and facilities are excellent overall. But since you're asking... It would be great to have an indoor aquatic park for children in the winter similar to Minnetonka's Williston indoor splash pad or Shoreview Community Center's. Perhaps over the long term, the pool at Edinborough could be expanded (?). 6 Supports comment... Reply to Kristen Frend http://s peak upedi na.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-program m i ng/topics/park-i m provem ents 1/19 comment... 11/10/2015 City of Edina sue kaiser 25 days ago I'd like to see the restrooms open earlier in the spring and later in the fall. Thank you! 3 Supports comment... Reply to sue kaiser] Andrew Brown 25 days ago Strachauer Park by Hwy 62 needs a new warming house and freshening up. It is a well used park by the residents 1 Support Jack Ellingson at November 09,2015 at 5:57pm CST I, an active Edina resident that lives near Strachauer Park, agree. However, I would rather see mountain bike trails in Edina parks first. This would better benefit the parks of Edina in the long term in that mountain bike trails attract riders that actively ride and maintain the parks. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jack Ellingson comment... x Reply to Andrew Brown Jay Halvorson 24 days ago We need a playground the is within walking distance for families with toddlers in our neighborhood. Over a mile is a long way to walk with a 2 year old. 1 Support Reply to Jay Halvorson http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 2/19 11/10/2015 Shelley Ch 23 days ago City of Edina Would like to see more off-leash dog parks in Edina; centrally located please. 1 Support Laura Kondrick atNovember 06,2015 at 3:33pm CST I worry about the city liability issues. You never think it will happen. But I have seen it happen. Dog bites dog. Dog bites man. Man kicks dog, Man punches man. I am not kidding! 0 Supports Shelley Ch atNovember 08,2015 at 12:06am CST Yes, I understand. My own beloved young dog lost vision (became blind) in his left eye this summer while walking at night at Centennial Lakes Park. He was attacked by a pitbull; both dogs were on leash. I will never trust a pitbull again! Nor owners of pitbulls! I have to sue this one to have my dog's vet expenses recovered; how ridiculous. Altogether a terrible experience, and I feel fortunate my dog survived. I agree with you, and, despite my own experience from this summer, hadn't thought of that. So many dogs are well-behaved and friendly, but there are those who are not, so harm is definitely a risk. Given that, I guess I retract my statement. So thank for your reply. 0 Supports Don MeCormiCkatNovember 08,2015 at 2:17pm CST comment.. .My family and I have been using the Van Valkenburg dog park for about six months. My dog loves it, people are friendly, owners pick up after their dogs, and the dogs are well behaved. I have yet to see dog or owner that is inappropriate. There was one dog this Saturday that arrived with a muzzle and still had an enjoyable time. Its seems to get a lot of use. I'd like a park on the East side of the city as I drive over from 50th & Wooddale. Pamela Park would be a hit. 1 Support comment... Reply to Laura Kondrick comment... Reply to Shelley Ch John Hamilton 21 days ago It seems to me that the overall park concepts have worked well, where they might use a little help would be in the fine grained details. How about selecting unique trees for leaf identification, pollinator friendly wildflower gardens combined with educational rain gardens to teach residents that life without sterile lawns is possible, bird feeders. Meandering walkways along the edges of the sports venues for neighborhood http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreati on-and-program m ing/topi cs/park-im provem ents 3/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina walkers through the park, a checkerboard, exercise equipment scattered along the walks, perhaps meeting rooms, an identified area for the gardening club, horseshoe pitch, a neighborhood message board, posted distances to interesting local points of interest (Starbucks, ice cream, etc.) for walkers to vary their routes, low level and attractive illumination to encourage morning and evening walkers especially in cold weather. A night sky telescope, local history storyboards, larger "free books" depositories for take one leave one exploration. Insect identification message boards. A compost pick-up bin. 3 Supports Elizabeth Genovese at November 06, 2015 at 8:50am CST John, I like many of your ideas. Am curious what you mean by "identified area for the gardening club'? just FYI Edina has 6 gardening clubs assoc. with the Mn state clubs. Love to have you join one. Arneson Acres has a pollinator garden that has been growing for 3 years and has expanded. Which Park is the one you mostly frequent? 0 Supports Laura Kondrick at November 06, 2015 at 3:39pm CST John, I would really like to see the natural habitat restored before planting anything. I moved to California in 1999 and returned to Edina in 2011 only to find my beloved Bredesen views of the ponds, creek, meadows, marches, sloughs obscured by BUCKTHORN. I would like to see the city restore our wildlife habitat and wildlife by getting rid of this non native invasive shrub. The city has let it go so long that it is a major problem. If early intervention had been a priority we wouldn't be in this fix now. 4 Supports 'comment... Reply to Elizabeth Genovese comment... Reply to John Hamilton Ellen Schousboe at November 04,2015 at 7:33pm CST I live near Pamela Park and I have enjoyed it for years, but I'm concerned about the state it's in. For as long as I have lived here, the park has been severely choked with many very noxious invasive species such as buckthorn and purple loostrife which are killing wildflowers and tree saplings. If they are not removed, in a few more decades the tree population and native wildflowers will mostly die out, and I fear the native birds will disappear too. The park is also very badly littered with garbage and dog droppings. I wish that the Park Board would be more proactive in keeping Pamela Park clean and removing the invasive species so that native wildflowers, pollinators, trees, and birds can remain in my neighborhood. Making garbage cans more available and posting signs remiding people to clean up after their dogs might help as well. Lastly, please unlock the restrooms so that we can use them. I have never been able to open one. I pick up litter and then can't wash my hands. 3 Supports Laura Kondrick at November 06, 2015 at 3:46pin CST http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvernents 4/19 comment... comment... Reply to Ellen Schousboe 11/10/2015 City of Edina I agree a hundred percent with your views on not native invasive species. I can not believe the city has let the buckthorn infestation develop to this degree. It obscures meadows, marshes, ponds, sloughs, the creek, etc. Most people have no idea what is behind the buckthorn. Our condo association has a problem with buckthorn and we have a yearly removal plan in place. Removal is expensive. We also have a Buckthorn Committee to stay on top of the seedlings and smaller plants. Somehow we have to educate our citizens and get the needed funding from the city. Someone suggested to me that we should have a parks liaison position for educating citizens, applying for grants, and coordinating volunteer cleanups. The city does not have to pay the whole bill if we make the effort to apply for grants. I think Minnetonka got a grant for $250,000! 4 Supports Reply to Laura Kondlick Aimee Pappenfus at November 06,2015 at 9:05am CST I live near Pamela Park and would love to see splash pads placed in the local parks. The pool is great, but not always convenient to cool off quickly in the summer. I am very pleased with the new path in Pamela. Thank you for that! 0 Supports comment... Reply to Aimee Pappenfus Leeanne Huber at November 06,2015 at 9:06am CST Several of the area parks have been updated and upgraded -- I would love to see more effort put into Arden Park. There's not much there for older kids. Still, I love the proximity and variety of parks in Edina! 0 Supports comment... Reply to Leeanne Huber Heather Bennett at November 06, 2015 at 9:16am CST Lewis Park has been long neglected by the city, but is often used by residents and guests - especially during sporting events. The playground could stand to be updated and a water fountain added nearby. The warming house is also in a sony state and should really be be replaced in the next few years. The newly updated outdoor rink will get lots of use, but the warming house really needs to be replaced! 0 Supports comment... I Reply to Heather Bennett I http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 5/19 comment... Reply to Jon Blumenthal 11/10/2015 City of Edina Leslie Vogel at November 06,2015 at 9:24am CST Walnut Ridge could use updated playground equipment. An indoor water park would be a great addition to the city. I Support comment. Reply to Leslie Vogel Leslie Vogel at November 06,2015 at 9:27am CST Lights around the walking path at Walnut Ridge would be nice. I Support !comment... Reply to Leslie Vogel Jon Blumenthal at November 06, 2015 at 9:39am CST Perhaps outside the purview of Parks & Rec, but my family would appreciate sidewalks for access to Pamela Park and/or a pedestrian cut- through over the creek as neighbors enjoy from Creek Drive at Valley View Lane to access Heights Park over Nine Mile Creek. I Support Erica Ziegler at November 06,2015 at 9:39am CST Arden park needs an update. There at lots of young families and the playground equipment could use a tot lot and updates for older kids too. Also, the warming house needs to be refreshed and perhaps the bathrooms could be open during daytime hours - similar to Countryside park (which was beautifully updated). 0 Supports comment... 4 Reply to Erica Ziegler Ir http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 6/19 Reply to Laura Kondrick comment... 11/10/2015 City of Edina Joel Stegner, Community volunteer at November 06,2015 at 10:42am CST Success is defined as use by people, not just organized sports. Today, ,.i wonder if we even have any idea bow many people use a park every day, or how many different people use a park a year. An unused park suggests our people are inactive, or don't know the parks are there, or have no safe way of getting there or that the park doesn't have the basic amenities that are characteristic of great parks. We may know people come, but we don't really know why many don't. For the parks to be true community resources and busy everyone in the community needs to have a good reason, if it is as simple as taking a walk and sitting on a bench and watching the clouds go by, hard to do in backyards with lots of trees. For those who have more time and less money, they are places to meet friends and make new ones, in the recent quality of life survey, Edina residents didn't rate themselves as very friendly. Busy parks are friendly places where neighbors actually see themselves. We build parks and assume like magic they will be used, but maybe we need to beef up their amenities and make a real effort to convince everyone who lives here to try them out! 1 Support Laura Kondrick at November 06,2015 at 3:50pm CST I so agree with the organized sports. Breamar - what can I say They just get too much emphasis. I am not slue the city has a clue about park usage. That would be a first step certainly! 0 Supports comment... Reply to Joel Stegner Joel Stegner, Community volunteer at November 06,2015 at 10:42am CST Success is defmed as use by people, not just organized sports. Today, .i wonder if we even have any idea how many people use a park every day, or how many different people use a park a year. An unused park suggests our people are inactive, or don't know the parks are there, or have no safe way of getting there or that the park doesn't have the basic amenities that are characteristic of great parks. We may know people come, but we don't really know why many don't. For the parks to be true community resources and busy everyone in the community needs to have a good reason, if it is as simple as taking a walk and sitting on a bench and watching the clouds go by, hard to do in backyards with lots of trees. For those who have more time and less money, they are places to meet friends and make new ones, in the recent quality of life survey, Edina residents didn't rate themselves as very friendly. Busy parks are friendly places where neighbors actually see themselves. We build parks and assume like magic they will be used, but maybe we need to beef up their amenities and make a real effort to convince everyone who lives here to try them out! 0 Supports comment... Reply to Joel Stegner T Dog at November 06, 2015 at 10:53am CST I played a couple of rounds of golf at Fred Richards this past summer. A great location and setup for golf, but the greens were in terrible shape and they did not have actually have holes and flag sticks. Though, the amount I paid for green fees was very reasonable! Given that Braemar is now reducing the amount of holes and will be under construction, I don't think it would be unreasonable to rethink the closing of Fred Richards http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 7/19 comment... comment... 'comment... 11/10/2015 City of Edina golf course. (Yeah I know .... Let it go.) 1 Support FA Laura Kondxick at November 06,2015 at 3:57pm CST Somebody told me we have 1 golf hole for every 1000 residents. The golf courses are business enterprises like the liquor stores but are not making money due to lack of usage and low green fees. Golf parks in Edina are Interlachen Country Club, Edina Country Club, Braemar Golf Course, and Fred Richardson which closed was In March 2014 when the City Council accepted the recommendation of staff and the Park Board to close Fred Richards Golf Course at the end of the 2014 season. Sorry I can't agree with you. 0 Supports T Dog at November 06,2015 at 5:56pm CST Interlachen and Edina CC are (highly priced) private clubs and should not considered as golfing opportunities for the general public . I strongly disagree that community owned golf courses should be thought of as "business enterprises", but rather they should be consider as a recreation park (like Braemar Ice Arena or the Aquatic Center). I think the given net loss of Fred Richards was less than $100,000. For the cost of redeveloping and maintaining the new park, Fred Richards golf could go on for well over over 30 years and cost the city less money. Finally, I think part of the problem was that the City Council decided to close Fred Richards before the Park Board finalize their plans. 1 Support Reply to Mike Welbaum Reply to Laura Kondrick Mike Welbaum at November 09,2015 at 11:32am CST Braemar golf course has a long history of being financially self-sufficient, including the bonds that were required to support Fred Richards - bonds that are now paid off The City Council, unceremoniously and using prejudicial data (see bonds, above) fmancial data decided to close the Fred... they forgot that Braemar is a community amenity, never intending to be a revenue source. By closing the Fred, the new, 18-hole plus executive version of Braemar will, indeed, be fmancially stronger... but anyone can run a facility with all the golf interest that exists here. The cost is losing a financially neutral, critical municipal asset, one that provides both young and old a friendly, healthy activity, and — it cannot be understated—has produced Many of Minnesota's leading golfers. My request/recommendation is to acknowledge the mistake and to re-open the Fred, and to do so ASAP. 1 Support Reply to T- Dog http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 8/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina Lee Nordstrom at November 06,2015 at 11:05am CST Pamela Park has just gotten some very nice improvements (walking path, warming hut, etc.), but I am disappointed by the attempt to overly manicure the park. With the new turf soccer field (which is great), a portion of the park is used a drainage zone - water from the turf field drains into this lower level area. It would have made a great space for natural wild grasses and flowers to grow, since it is not really usable for other things as it is often wet. That's what was about to happen in late summer, but then the parks department plowed the whole area and attempted to plant lawn-type grass there, which will never grow given the moisture level of this area. 4 Supports Laura Kondrick at November 06,2015 at 4:03pin CST I agree. There are many parks that areas that would be Perfect to convert to marsh or the like. We have this situation at Walnut Ridge Park too. I see the lawn guys try to mow these wet spots and put big tire marks in the soft soil. We could save some money if it didn't need mowing! It would be very inexpensive to let it convert from grass, just stop mowing it and nature will return it to natural habitat. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Laura Kondrick comment... Reply to Lee Nordstrum Lisa berg Juran at November 06,2015 at 1:52pm CST More play equipment for the toddler ages (2-5 years). Most of the play equipment in most of the parks is geared towards kids age 5 and up (according to the information posted on the equipment). The littlest kiddos deserve a place to play too! 0 Supports comment... I Reply to Lisa 'berg' Juran paula colestock at November 06,2015 at 1:52pm CST Please add some mountain bike trails for the Edina Cycling Team! The team started with about 10 riders three years ago and this year they finished their season with over 50 riders! 11 Supports Laura Kondrick at November 06,2015 at 4:05pm CST What would a mountain bike trail look like? Are there places in Edina that you would like to see this trails? http://speakupedi na.org/discussions/parks-recreati on-and-program m ing/topics/park-im provem ents 9/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina 0 Supports Jack Ellingson at November 07,2015 at 1:59pm CST Braemar has some great potential for trails 8 Supports Peter Larson at November 09, 2015 at 1:55pm CST Would love to see some Mtn. Biking trails in Edina. It is a great sport for kids and adults. Currently our family drives to other cities to access trails. 5 Supports Leib Mazion at November 09,2015 at 1:52pm CST I agree, Iran bike trails would be a great addition! High School mtn biking is likely the fastest growing sport nationally and in Minnesota. This past year Mn had over 700 racers competing statewide and that number will likely exceed 1000 next year! Many communities, such as Duluth, have embraced mtn biking by building extensive trail networks. The cost to build and maintain these trails compared to other facilities is relatively small and can often be accomplished with volunteers. Kids love to bike and mtn biking is a great life long sport! 6 Supports bruce freeman at November 09, 2015 at 11:26am CST Mtn bike trails are very narrow 18" winding trails through the woods and along side all the hills surrounding Braemar. We have fantastic terrain there, some of the best in city. Mtn biking trails are very easy to build and cheap with zero maintenance from the city. Braemar is only place with enough terrain to make it worthwhile. You need a few miles of trail. We use the areas that nobody uses, woods, swamps, and sides of hills 5 Supports . comment... Reply to Laura Kondrick comment... Reply to paula colestock http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 10/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina Jim Vandervelde at November 06,2015 at 1:53pm CST Walnut Ridge Park is wonderful and the path around it is heavily used by walkers and pet owners. A few lights around the perimeter of the walking path would be very welcomed by visitors and increase safety. 0 Supports comment . . Reply to Jim Vandervelde Craig Bourgeault at November 06,2015 at 2:12pm CST What ever happened with the France and 40th Street well property? that would be an ideal spot to build mountain bike trails, it would be compatible with the uses the surrounding residents already put to it. The "un-improved" open space there would go along way to replacing the Pamela park open space lost to the sports associations. 7 Supports Laura Kondrick at November 06,2015 at 4:08pm CST That would be good place for this. Great idea. Is it expensive to build these trails? Could you get fmancial support, donations or grants to build it? I don't think the city will fund it, but if you had a funding proposal and a plan approved by the city council they might approve the land use. This would be a big project, but is doable. Good luck! 0 Supports bruce freeman at November 09,2015 at 11:31am CST Braemar is a 100 times better place for mtn biking trail system many miles lond and the park you're talking about I just rode it for the first time and I think just leave it as it is, wild and unstructured and focus any trail building at Braemar where the city knows very well about a detailed plan for creating a fantastic trail system surrounding Braemar in the hills where nobody goes. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Laura Kondrick I comment... 4 Reply to Craig Bourgeault Craig Bourgeault at November 06,2015 at 2:12pm CST What ever happened with the France and 40th Street well property? that would be an ideal spot to build mountain bike trails, it would be http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvennents 11/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina compatible with the uses the surrounding residents already put to it. The "un-improved open space there would go along way to replacing the Pamela park open space lost to the sports associations. 6 Supports comment... Reply to Craig Bourgeault Brian Kompelien at November 06,2015 at 2:17pm CST I'm in favor of developing single track mountain bike trails at "Weber Woods" (near Weber Park). Single track bike trails are an efficient use of space and can be built alongside other activities. Many kids in the neighborhood would be drawn to these trails rather than riding in the streets. 9 Supports comment... Jennifer Wilson at November 06, 2015 at 2:36pm CST More trees planted! 1 Support Laura Kondrick at November 06, 2015 at 4:09pm CST And more buckthorn removed to make room for the trees! 2 Supports comment... Reply to Brian Kompelien Reply to Laura Kendrick comment... Reply to Jennifer Wilson KB Montgomery at November 06,2015 at 2:47pm CST I completely agree with Kristan that an indoor recreation facility that could be used by all residents is needed in Edina. We have a perfect opportunity to build one on the public land at GrandView. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan has noted that Edina is behind communities both locally and nationally for indoor recreation facilities. Health, wellness and the concepts of community and socialization are all vital and necessary to enlightened 21st century cities. Without public access to general recreation facilities, Edina risks falling behind other communities who have long recognized the need to serve all residents. http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-program nn ng/topics/park-improvements 12/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina 2 Supports comment... Reply to K.B. Montgomery Chris Kennedy at November 06, 2015 at 3:40pm CST I visit the Van Valkenburg dog park at least once a day. I would guess that, other than Bredeson Park, there is no other park in Edina that gets the use that this dog park does. In addition, it's the only park that requires a fee to use. Yet the park is truly neglected. Please make sure that the grass is mowed regularly and that the containers for doggie doo bags are always full. A couple more permanent benches would also be nice. Thanks! 2 Supports comment... % Reply to Chris Kennedy Laura Kondrick at November 06, 2015 at 4:14pm CST I so agree! The recent resident survey showed community support for an indoor recreation facility but the city council thinks an arts center is a better idea (a theatre, dance, etc. like in Hopkins). I wholeheartedly agree with the community survey that an indoor recreation facility would be the best use of the available land. I don't know why the city council is not supporting the survey results. Gosh just think indoor basketball court, exercise equipment, toddler spaces ,space for yoga etc. This is an amenity that would add real value. 1 Support comment... Reply to Laura Kondrick Ted Youel at November 06,2015 at 4:55pm CST My daughter was on the Edina mountain bike team and had a wonderful experience although it would have been nice if the team could have trained locally. The acreage and elevation around the Braemar golf course are ideal for mountain biking and is right next to the high school. With over 50 of our middle and high schoolers on the team, we definitely have the demand. Compared to what we spend on golf and hockey at Braemar, building the trails would be a drop in the bucket. And in addition to providing an outlet for exercise and fresh air, mountain bikers also maintain their own trails. 11 Supports comment... Reply to Ted Youel Craig Boureeault at November 06,2015 at 5:05pm CST http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 13/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina Most single track trails are built with a combination of professionals and volunteer labor, but they are maintained by the dedicated users of the trails. Look at Lebanon Hills in Burnsville for an excellent example of cooperative and constructive use of space for multiple uses, maintained by the people who use the space. 9 Supports bruee freeman at November 09, 2015 at 11:34am CST Please tell any mtn bikers you know to support a trail system around braemar. Fantastic terrain 4 Supports comment ... Reply to bruce freeman comment... Reply to Craig Bourgeault Laura Kondrick at November 07,2015 at 12:47am CST Grandview Monthly Update (Community Center) September 2015 Former Public Works Site Public Works Site — Redevelopment Planning This addresses the framework for a community center "The preferred community facility should be flexible in nature so that it can be used for multiple community purposes. The new facility should be welcoming and inviting for all generations. It would likely replace the existing Edina Art Center and Edina Senior Center facilities. Additional space would be included to provide for future generational programming. Since most community-oriented facilities operate at a loss, a limited operational subsidy is likely but should be minimized." Follow this link for more information http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section—planning_GrandViewUpdate Also see Friday Report 11/6/2015: Convene Week The week of Nov. 16 is "Convene Week" for the Grandview Area Transportation Study. The project team will engage many different stakeholders during this week to gather input about how to advance the Grandview Framework ideas to the next step. Residents who were involved in the development of the Framework will be asked to continue to provide feedback, along with any other interested residents. Residents should look for press releases and/or emails with dates and times for meetings. The project team will be giving the Council an overview at the Nov. 17 City Council Meeting. Open House 5:30-7:30 p.m. Wednesday, April 22, 2015 Edina Senior Center 5280 Grandview Square View and comment on possible scenarios. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Laura Kondrick Laura Kondrick at November 07,2015 at 12:52am CST NEXT PARK BOARD MEETING! PLEASE COME AND GIVE COMMENTS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING Tuesday, November 10, 201517:00 pm Park Board Meeting http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 14/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Minnesota 0 Supports comment... I Reply to Laura Kondrick I Cyd Pat November 07,2015 at 10:30am CST Way too much overdevelopment of Pamela Park. It is now an outdoor rec facility.., no longer really a park. Plastic playing field, overkill on the high fencing everywhere, 60 ft. tall blaring lights, asphalt path through the middle of the park, huge parking lot. Parks and nature are such an important piece of overall health and well being. More emphasis should be put on planting native plants, restoring marsh areas, eradicating buckthorn, and providing spaces that are truly "natural" for our kids to learn and play in. Less asphalt, less plastic, metal, lights, and other manufactured environments. Those elements are in our lives all day every day. The point of a park is to get away from man-made and back to nature. 1 Support Shelley Ch at November 08, 2015 at 12:27am CST I agree with most things that you say, but I just want to add that I really appreciate the asphalt walking path through the park, and I walk it most days (with dogs). With the moisture in the ground through much of the park, the park would not be very walkable without that paved path. So I am very appreciative of it. I have no idea if it is feasible or desirable as a community, but I think more vegetation, including trees, should be added in the middle of the park (still talking about Pamela Park). My impression is that that wide open grassy space, which has signs that say "closed" (which I think is because the ground is very damp, and also there is a lot of geese droppings there), is just that and is not usable by people. If that's the case, please populate that space with nature, especially trees and bushes, etc. Eventually flowers would be great. There seems to be so much bare, unusable space as-is now. 1 Support comment... L Reply to Shelley Ch I comment... 4 Reply to Cyd P. Nate Wohl at November 08,2015 at 7:03pm CST I think we have a lot to offer already in terms of fields. There are things mentioned that should be added improvements. But when talking about athletics, we can increase the amount of programs that get usage by adding more lighted parks. Especially with Daylight Savings now getting darker by 5pm, but weather holding up well, athletic events could still be held. Also during summer months, games can be held until about lOpm. There are plenty of parks in Minneapolis, Hopkins, St Louis Park that have lights. Adding lights to Highlands Park could greatly increase the usage of the currently great space we have. Lights could help a lot for adult leagues mentioned in other posts as its easier for schedules with later games (or at least it would be for someone like me with my schedule). 0 Supports http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 15/19 11/10/2015 City of Edina comment... Fr' Reply to Nate Wohl bruce freeman atNovember 09,2015 at 11:18am CST We need mountain biking at the hills around Braemar. We have amazing terrain for mtn biking some of the best in the city. We want to use the space that nobody else wants, the sides of wooded hills Mtn biking is so cheap to build because its just a dirt trail through the woods with no city maintence which is done by the community of users. Mtn bilcing is a fantastic all body workout. Each person chooses the speed and intensity of the expereince. Edina high mtn biking team is now a regular high school sport with no place to practice. We have a fantastic local mtn biking organization MORC Minnesota Off Road Cycling that can help with design and implementation. Many cities around the state are developing mtn biking trail systems because they are so easy and inexpensive to build and maintain and are considered valuable public assets. Duluth just got Gold designation from IMBA for its development of multiple trails around the city. Only one other place in US has achieved Gold status. Its a fast growing sport, kids love it, We need to develop a fantastic trail system around Braemar in the hills surrounding the park. 8 Supports comment... Reply to bruce freeman Fl Barbara La Valleur at November 09,2015 at 1245pm CST We live near Centennial Lakes park and The Promenade both featuring numerous sculptures. Still, it's amazing to me the number of Edina residents who don't know about it nor have never walked these two gems! Public Art Edina would love to have a colorful mural on the grey concrete wall at the Aquatic Center, too, at Lake Cornelia Park. If we could only find the $$$ resources! Suggestions? 0 Supports comment... Reply to Barbara La Valleur 101 Mertyce Mrvos at November 09,2015 at 1:41pm CST Mt Bike Trails at Braemar would be fantastic. They would not only be used by the Edina Cycling Team, but also by adults. Mt biking is a lifetime sport and is attractive to a wide range of people of various ages and fitness levels. 6 Supports comment... 4 Reply to Mertyce Mrvos Tim Sudeith at November 09,2015 at 2:14pm CST Mountain biking is a fast-growing sport Adding trails at Braemar would be ideal. It utilizes a virtually unused space at little cost and would attract cyclists of all ages. Mountain bike trails would be an asset to Edina. http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 16119 11/10/2015 City of Edina 5 Supports comment... Reply to Tim Sudeith Jennifer Kompelien at November 09,2015 at 2:21pm CST Mountain bike trails at Braemar or Weber Woods would be a great add to the Edina Community. Our Edina Mountain Bike Team is fast- growing but no place to practice in Edina. Trails can be built and maintained without a huge investment and would keep Edina current with a fast-growing sport! 3 Supports comment... Reply to Jennifer Kompelien Jeff Merriam at November 09,2015 at 3:12pm CST MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAILS!!!! 4 Supports comment... Reply to Jeff Merriam Randalyn Merriam at November 09,2015 at 3:44pm CST i think mountain bike trails would be an amazing addition to Edina! 3 Supports comment... Reply to Randalyn Merriam Tom Delaney at November 09,2015 at 5:37pm CST My wife and 2 boys love to mountain bike. It would be a great addition to Edina with a growing HS and Middle School team along with many active families. Currently, the Edina Mountain Bike team rides to Theodore Wirth to ride on trails. It is very challenging getting 40-50 kids to the trail in Minneapolis. It would be much more desirable to have a trail in our city. I believe Braemar has great terrain for building trails. This would be an incredible asset to the residents of Edina 1 Support http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/park-improvements 17/19 U n SHARE your feedback! POST your ideas! 1 JOIN the discussion! 11/10/2015 City of Edina City of Edina rx ▪ Home • Discussions sig:h rums eas • Meetings ▪ Surveys Email lemail address... Panwp4,,„e password... or, Sig9iia with: Conne6tign Un Sign Up Sign In Like { 0 I Tweet IShare This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Parks, Recreation and Programming The City has more than 30 neighborhood parks around the city, each unique in its own way with different amenities. Throughout the year, but primarily in the summer, the Parks & Recreation Department offers a variety of programming opportunities from Fab 4 & 5, Summer Playgrounds and sports camps to art classes, tennis lessons and adaptive recreation. 3 Topics 90 Answers Closed 2015-11-09 View Discussion Topic: Programming What do you think about the Parks & Recreation Department's current offerings of programing? What classes and activities would you like to see added in the future? 11 Responses 11 Responses Sandra x 25 days ago What Edina is lacking is a community center with among other things a world class recreation center that will generate income. The current community center is old, inadequate , and univiting. In the future the current Community Center will likely revert to a school only building and we will be left with nothing. I implore the parks department to lobby the City Council to finally commit to building a new Community Center at Grandview. 6 Supports comment... Reply to Sandra x http://speakupedinaorg/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/programming 1/6 11/10/2015 City of Edina Joel Stegner, Community volunteer 25 days ago I agree that a new Community Center is a need. I would like the city to vastly expand its programming for young adults,middle aged,and seniors - sponsoring a team or a league in eveiy and all sports or working with the youth sports association to add adult divisions. I also would like to see greater youth access to golf and tennis (part of the school PE curriculum) and create new associations for running and biking open to all ages. Finally, I would like Edina to sponsor a massive all ages tennis tournament. 3 Supports comment... Reply to Joel Stegner Shelley Ch 23 days ago I agree wholeheartedly with Joel Stegner. Excellent ideas and much needed! I am a 50 year old woman who would absolutely LOVE to be able to join an adult soccer league or pick-up games in the city of Edina. I'm sure other adult residents feel the same about other sports. As a supposed "great city", this kind of offering is basic, so needed, and I presume easy to materialize. We keep hiring all sorts of city personnel; I would hope that we would not need yet another staff person to coordinate adult leagues, but let's get it on! 2 Supports 'comment... Reply to Shelley Ch Elizabeth Genovese at November 06,2015 at 8:57am CST I would like to have outdoor Yoga or Tai Chi at Arneson in the summer. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Elizabeth Genovese Joel Stegner, Community volunteer at November 06, 2015 at 11:00am CST Another comment about adult team sports. Over time, adult sports have ended up with the left overs in terms of times and spaces not used by our ever expanding youth programs. I was forced for many years to play the multiple sports I played on Wednesday - church night - because youth weren't using it. I sing in my church choir, so I got lucky and things fit, or more often, I missed one or the other. Adult programming should be done when people are available. The Senior Center schedules lots of programs during the day. Working adults are most available in the evenings and on the weekend. With evenings, it is pretty late to socialize after the game, while on the weekend, adults have their leisure time. It is when workers golf and it would be ideal for team sports, if staffmg can we worked out. If you program for adults with their schedules and convenience in mind, you will get more participation. With teams that require numbers, relaxing the residence requirements a bit would help - maybe at 30 or 40% limit on non-residents with them paying higher fees. I observed that it was not uncommon for to roster non-residents, but rules would level the playing field. http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-program m ing/topics/program ming 2/6 11/10/2015 City of Edina 1 Support Reply to Joel Stegner comment... T Dog at November 06,2015 at 11:11am CST What's the status of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail? It seems every other city but Edina has off street bike trails. 0 Supports Jordan Gilgenbach admin at November 06,2015 at 11:38am CST Good question! Work in some areas along the new trail have already begun this fall. The City and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District held a groundbreaking event for the start of construction on Oct. 23. More info on the trail can be found at https://www.threeriversparlcs.org/about/planning-and-construction/construction-projectsinine-mile-creek-trail.aspx. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach comment... Reply to T- Dog Ryan Weber at November 06,2015 at 12:01pm CST As a 42 year old soccer player, I am no longer interested in officiated leagues like CSC. I feel that they tend to offer limited playing time (about 30 minutes depending on the number of subs) and the level of officiating in these recreational leagues is really poor. They might as well not even have refs. ..So instead I've been playing in pick-up games around the Twin Cities Area for about 10 years now. The games are usually a diverse mix of ages, nationalities, sexes, and abilities. Pickup games are still competitive, but not out for blood, and offer the best opportunity to play a decent length of time (1-2 hours). There are some pickup games outdoors in Edina throughout the spring to fall, but nothing during the winter. Now that Braemar Field is complete, I would encourage the activities programmers to look at the adult pickup soccer program in Plymouth as an example of a good adult pickup soccer program. The program is so popular that there is typically a waiting list now to get in. They offer 2 nights a week. ..one night is more competitive and the other is less competitive. They are co-ed, but the competitive night tends to be mostly men. The games are not officiated and last 1.5 hours, which is plenty of time to make you good and tired. Residents of Plymouth get a discounted price, but it is open to people throughout the area. If Braemar Field were to offer this type of program on an alternate night from the Plymouth Rec Center program, I could almost guarantee its success. 2 Supports Shelley Ch at November 08,2015 at 12:33am CST Great idea and information! Hear, hear!! http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/programming 3/6 Reply to Shelley Ch i comment... Reply to Ryan Weber 11/10/2015 0 Supports City of Edina comment... Laura Kondrick at November 06,2015 at 4:31pm CST Eden Prairie has the Wells Fargo Gymnasium at their community center. It offers a variety of gym activities including tot gym, adult basketball, family open gym, pickleball and adjacent racquetball courts. Wouldn't that be wonderful!!!! (It looks like they got corporate sponsorship - why can't we do that?!! I think there are some upper income residents who could really help us out with something like that.) How about including pickle ball courts in our community center?. Pickle ball is one of the fastest-growing sports in America! I Support comment... Reply to Laura Kondrick Stephanie Mullaney at November 09,2015 at 9:31am CST After years of the Council saying no to a community recreation center - maybe they should RE-CONSIDER a rec center. The current plan to use Grandview as an arts center and performing arts center will NOT draw the volume of people they want for a "catalyst" for the area. It will also lose money, like our neighboring art centers. Throughout all the public surveys, the most requested functionality is walking/jogging. WHERE can one walk inside and be in a community setting? Be able to do muscle building exercise? The population in Edina is aging and we need to consider future, needs, not only for hockey families and golfers, but for the MAJORITY of the residents. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Stephanie Mullaney Sign Up Connect email address... Participants Sign Up http://speakupedina.org/discussions/parks-recreation-and-programming/topics/programming 4/6 Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2015-113: Denial of a Site Plan with Variances f or Bank of America, 6868 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Continue consideration of a denial of the applicant's request to January 5, 2016, to allow the applicant time to revise their plans to address concerns raised by the City Council. INT RODUCT ION: At the November 4, 2015 meeting, the City Council asked staff to prepare a resolution with findings f or denial of the request f or Site Plan approval with Variances to build a new Bank of America building at 6868 France Avenue. Staff has draf ted that resolution and is attached. The applicant however, is requesting the City Council not take action on the project yet, to allow time to revise the plans to address concerns that were raised by the City Council. The applicant would like to move the drive-through and new building to possibly meet City Code. I f they can meet setback requirements, the request would then be f or a Site Plan Review and Parking Stall Variance. See attached extension request from Bank of America. Deadline for a City decision: January 19, 2016 AT TACHMENT S: Description Letter from Bank of America Requesting an Extension Resolution No. 2015-113 Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Approve plan to complete a Grandview facility operational and feasibility study, including the f ormation of a task force to work on the project. INT RODUCT ION: I n order to continue to f urther ref ine the concept of a “Community Facility” at Grandview, staff suggests completing a detailed programming, operational and financial f easibility study. The recently completed preliminary work regarding a Grandview f acility needs f urther study, research and refinement bef ore the Parks & Recreation staf f and Park Board are able to make a recommendation to the City Council on f acility and programmatic components of a potenial community facility. Staf f has identified a consulting team and funding sources f or the study. If approved by the City Council, the Operational and Feasibility Study would begin in December and would take approximately four months to complete. AT TACHMENT S: Description Staff Report: Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study Grandview Conceptual Site Plan HGA Proposal Sutton + Associates Proposal Pros Consulting Proposal Tuesday, November 17, 2015 Mayor and City Council Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study Information / Background: In November 2014 the city entered into a partnership with Frauenshuh to collaboratively plan the potential redevelopment of the city’s former Public Works site at 5146 Eden Ave. Six scenarios were prepared after input from the community and real estate market. Four of the scenarios included combinations of public and private uses on the site. All public and all private scenarios were also modeled. These scenarios were discussed by the City Council in May 2015. Since the City Council provided preliminary direction in June 2015 and expressed a preference for Scenario #3, staff has prepared additional material to better understand the feasibility of pursuing a large-scale mixed use development on the site. ESG Architects was engaged to refine Scenario #3 and to conduct a preliminary architectural study to ensure that the civic program elements were feasible for the site and to begin to imagine the look and feel for a potential Grandview Community Facility. The preliminary architectural conceptual site plan which was presented to the City Council work session on Sept. 1, 2015 is included in this report. At the Sept. 1, 2015 work session the City Council provided feedback to staff on the status and possible future direction of the Grandview project. The City Council was generally in agreement on the following key points regarding a new “Grandview Center”: 1) Continue in the direction of a mixed-use, public/private development 2) Continue pursuit of a flexible community building that can be used for multiple community purposes and be welcoming and inviting for multiple generations 3) Continue to combine Arts Center and Senior Center operations at this site with the intention of closing the two existing facilities. These uses would be supplemented by additional multi-generational community programming by the Parks & Recreation Department STAFF REPORT Page 2 4) Continue to include Frauenshuh as potential development partner 5) Philanthropic contribution(s) are desired 6) Lease partnerships should be considered 7) Voter approval via referendum is highly likely 8) A limited operating subsidy may be acceptable for a new community facility 9) Continue to refine the concept and report back in late spring 2016 to determine how to proceed With this information, in order to continue to further refine the concept of a “Community Facility”, Parks & Recreation Department staff suggested that the Park Board include a feasibility study as part of the Park Board’s 2016 Work Plan and department staff included it in the Parks & Recreation Department 2016 Work Plan. The preliminary work that has been completed needs further study, research and refinement before the Parks & Recreation Department staff and Park Board are able to make a recommendation to the City Council on facility and programmatic components of a Grandview community facility. Staff was directed to select a consulting team to assist with the facility operational feasibility study. Staff began to identify possible partners and funding sources for a thorough and detailed study and ultimately is recommending the following experts in the areas of planning, design and estimating; operational analysis and arts programming. Planning, Design & Estimating Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc (HGA) came very highly recommended as a potential partner and Project Lead for the feasibility study. HGA recently completed feasibility studies for the cities of Minnetonka, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Eden Prairie and Bloomington for new community centers or community center additions/renovations. HGA has an impressive resume of community center and performing and visual arts facilities including the Janet Wallace Fine Arts Center at Macalester College, Nelson Cultural Center at the American Swedish Institute, Saint Paul Academy, College of Saint Benedict, and Longwood University, to name a few. The scope of HGA’s work will include four phases: Visioning and Programming; Site Analysis and Conceptual Design; Cost Estimating; and Final Report. HGA has a staff of 40 and specializes in the evaluation, planning and design of community, recreation and cultural facilities. Feasibility, Operational Analysis & Pro Forma Pros Consulting was selected to complete the operational analysis of the feasibility study, including a business plan. The Park Board and Parks & Recreation Department staff recently worked with Pros on the Park, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan. Pros Consulting scope of work contains six stages: Data Collection and Market Analysis; Community and Stakeholder Public Input; Program Identification; Facility Building Program; Operational Plan; Draft STAFF REPORT Page 3 Report, Presentation and Final Report. The Operational Plan will include revenue and expense details, financial modeling and pro formas. Pros will work with HGA and an Edina team to study programmatic needs and interests and determine the operational feasibility of each programmatic component. Arts Analysis Sutton + Associates were selected to complete the arts analysis portion of the study. Sutton + Associates have been involved with the Edina Art Center since 2012 when they completed an analysis of the operations of the current Art Center. The Sutton + Associates scope includes: Market and Comparative Analysis; Programming Plan; Operational Plan; and Recommendations. The data provided by Sutton + Associates will be included in the overall feasibility study and business plan completed by Pros Consulting. Sutton will study the Twin Cities arts market, in addition to the Edina market to determine which arts components are needed and desired in Edina and which will be supported and successful components at Grandview. Staff believes that the team of HGA, Pros and Sutton + Associates provides an exceptional compliment to the Edina team of city staff, Park Board, Arts & Culture Commission, School District staff and Edina resident resources. Val Burke, Director of Community Education for Edina Public Schools has generously offered her time and expertise to assist with the study. Edina Parks & Recreation and Community Education staff believe that significant consideration and study should go into how Parks & Recreation and Community Education can best partner on programming, facilities and staffing initiatives at a new Grandview community facility and in general. The challenge of this study will be to recommend a multi-generational community facility that meets the current and future needs of all Edina residents, adds significant community value, combines resources, and replaces aging and dated facilities and/or programs. Task Force Staff recommends appointing a task force to assist with this study. The Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study Task Force would meet with the consulting team at every step during this process. The Task Force will be the leadership group representing the key stakeholders and will provide direction to the consulting team. The task force will be composed of the following members: Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager STAFF REPORT Page 4 Donna Tilsner, Recreation Supervisor, Senior Center Amanda Holle, Recreation Supervisor Val Burke, Director of Community Education Park Board – Two Members Arts & Culture Commission – Two Members In addition to the task force, user groups will also be utilized to determine programmatic needs for the facility. A task force format was selected due to the short term nature of this project and the necessary group composition of staff, Park Board and Arts & Culture Commission representatives. Public Process Two open houses will be scheduled. The first will be an initial open house well before programs are developed in order to gather information to include and consider in the programmatic models. The second will be a pre-final open house to gather final feedback prior to finalizing a recommended model. Operational and Feasibility Study Project Costs: HGA $52,100 Pros Consulting $27,500 Sutton + Associates $12,500 Total $92,100 Funding Sources $82,100 of this project will be funded by the Parks & Recreation Department budget with funding from 2015 and 2016. $10,000 will be funded by the 2016 Art Center budget. At the completion of this analysis, staff will be confident in recommending a proposal to the Park Board and City Council and will provide a detailed programmatic recommendation with corresponding facility components and also pro formas to support the proposal. HGA will also provide an exterior and interior image of the final product, including cost estimates for construction. If approved, the study will start at the beginning of December and will take four months to complete. The City Council has requested the next Grandview facility update to take place by May 2016. 1=- THE OPUS GROUP Reynolds urban Design Sutton + Associates Cultural Facility Oevo•Inpm..nt. DJR ARCHITECTURC INC COnFLUEnCE Schuler Shook esc architects WSB Ill FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group G RAN DVIEW Former Public Works Site • .• -Conceptual_ Site- • City council ecternber St These materials are preliminary in nature. They are prepared for discussion purposes only. • _rt....MinIrribionadaillilftilill141ER1160111:14111011011011•11Mil Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts ESG Architects was engaged to refine Scenario #3 and to conduct a preliminary architectural study to (1) ensure that the civic program elements are feasible for the site and architects (2) to begin to imagine the look and feel for a potential Grandview Community Center WSB Associates was engaged to conduct a traffic impact 1't/SB study of the mixed-use program identified in Scenario #3. ANNEn & Associates. September 1st, 2015 2 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group While preliminary in nature, these studies confirm that the mixed-use / public-private scenario is realistic for the site. COMMUNITY CENTER c. Streetscaping ofEden & Arcadia Widening of Arcadia • 1LN . . ' —' n Nar AN •sor ... ,•limme .. 'w, !MI liirt RI IIMMII lawassomammonar= / _.... . Formerir Public Works Site ID .• • • sir . -'' , • ! AI A ilk ' ' A Ate,l ric - -IC_ 9 n c ept s IMMINi.4--^:.11MBIIIIEN- i.:-...1k1. -'.--.SE-M10 HARED STREET iiiiiimmaii ...immonimmommil-,F,5,4 .p.,..- falEAUFII _ - um= oloommer, IRON: 11,'W 4;1°11" 1'1 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING Preliminary Program 60,000 + SF community center 8,000 SF restaurant/cafe New east-west shared street outdoor civic plaza 170-unit apartment building e 4 If fttiP f7"..=;V• N4_44.A - _147,aeft, Concept illustration only. Not for construction. Avr September 1st, 2015 3 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group 4 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group September 1st, 2015 Engaging the steep hill along Arcadia to create a strong civic presence Concept illustration only. Not for construction. 8fi r Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts 5 September 1st, 2015 r FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group - Creating a lively outdoor space that is welcoming and inviting Concept illustration only. Not for construction. slir Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts Creating drama and visual interest that is timeless not trendy ty/f 6 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group September 1st, 2015 Concept illustration only. Not for construction. Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts 7 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group September 1st, 2015 Concept illustration only. Not for construction. A notable roofline that is visible from all directions Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts Concept illustration only. Not for construction. A grand and welcoming entrance September 1st, 2015 8 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts Former Public Works Site Architectural Concepts — main floor 0, C.n 1 September 1st, 2015 -cr Traditional floor plan overlaid with openness and pedestrian appeal Concept illustration only. Not for construction. 1ff FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Former Public Works Site Architectural Concepts — second floor Comfortable destinations on upper level with memorable stairway and outdoor terrace 05 0 I Concept illustration only. Not for construction. September 1st, 2015 FRAUENSHUH 10 Commercial Real Estate Group cu 0 4-I u fa -% (fl 4-1 1/1 c =0 U C 4-1 00 Z 0- W U e c te m •e r 1 s t, 2 0 1 f, Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts — residential building Concept illustration only. Not for construction. I!a 0 ON 11111 1 - smog!' 1201 g n Eg . ,. so 21._ .....,, -1:4 11 pi A _A _ Nt: ..rign 5: Eli 11 n 9 mg 11_2 II It := ' mot! Wilf19-1111 ,1 all II ll I : '-- AMIll .,,,... ._._ . ..,......„ ........ . ..... i !Ai . ii i 4;r. ' I A 4,1:Lw*.. V g 5 II ,-,g, 141 7-;,,, - w. II" ,r,„:4 t„ei , 01 as .4.E"7 " ! Non nu a LW — '7z:••=4 g-- — 4.'7,;',71.;,-;:";:',::' ,,,',' .0 , ^•"' . , . I I ;1111. I I A' II . ........2,.. I till , II i 'kite ir ---•._--, ...„..„.........,„,...;,,...„.„. „ ,...„,_ .-. w_ ....._ ,.„..„,,,,w. ,..,.,,.4„;,,,,..,......., Rendering of a potential apartment building facing Eden Ave,, ,s , September 1st, 2015 12 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group BOH EXTRA LARGE COMMUNITY ROOM '71,1111WW/"4:- 4M141111r 111r171,13.111111,14 - _ Concept illustration only. Not for construction. RESIDENTIAL U NITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL U NITS RESIDENTIAL U NITS AMENITY LEVEL RESIDENTIAL UNITS TOWN PARKING .. ------- "nikriiv'E PARKING ART STUDIOS BOH RESTAURANT ED IU M M MU N ITY RM.S_ SERVIG, ----- ' ------------ --- ------- ------- PARKING PARKING •n••1, SHARED STREET EDEN AVENUE RESIDENTIAL ENTRY The hilly terrain presents challenges and opportunities. The existing excavation can be used to mask the public parking below the new 1 community building. 13 September 1st, 2015 JERRY'S ENTERPRISE BUILDING BEYOND COMMUNITY CENTER MAIN ENTRY FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts — cross section 14 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts — first floor E -cra, I 1-'11 a _ 8 a 3 3 3 cn 2 3 B a 3 g • 8 a g' 3 a o g c cn4 -2 - • LLi1rJ 1,"77-1 40, 4 1 , I 7 0- On Street Parking (.0 DRAFT j-or-discusion onrci co/ C.0 cra ,Concept illustration only. Not for construction. \ September 1st, 2015 Concept illustration only. Not for construction. sp un u ! ll am G -6•-. Former Public Works Site Preliminary Architectural Concepts — second floor DRAFT for discussion only ,/ 1 September 1st, 2015 15 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group a • a • • • a I.' . . Public Parking • u•i• • • • • • • • a a DRAFT for discussion only FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group I September 1st, 2015 sConcppt Illustration only. Not forciinstruction. ( 1/ • • ,,-.4.111111111n 111111110•1 111111111111 MIN • MU • • a, rn 0 0 On Street Parking - 13 -, 0 CD CO CO IQ t° G3 P x 0 0 Ca Ca • 16 Former Public Works Site Architectural Concepts — parking levels .11 • 41.2 • •.• 4 ••• • B •II II ••• • •,•• s ••• • • •II • tog II gall a • . to ii ant • ••• 11. Ass s X •n •* • 0 I September 1st, 2015 /— DRAFT for discussion only • "<11: CO CCLI CD 1‘) Service a a • • •••85•911 ,111110 • II its II S•1t 1_ 11.... • • 17 • —L • • • • S • • 11-1----• • • • • W • • • • • • a • 11 9. 9. CD CD -13 Os Cn Public Parking / Park-n-Ride -11— ▪ * • W • • • • • • • • • 555 77 • • • • • FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Concept illustration only. Not for construction. Nei • Use Residential (170 units) Community Center (60k SF) Retail (6k SF) Restaurant (8k SF) Total New Trips Former Public Works Site Traffic Impact Study The WSB Traffic Study notes that traffic volume in the Grandview area has remained about the same or has reduced in recent years. Some reduction could be attributed to the relocation of the Public Works operations. The Study indicates that the conceived public/private project will result in a slight to modest increase to traffic in the Grandview area. It also indicates that adequate capacity is available for a park-n-ride facility. Trip Generation Parking Daily Trips AM PM Peak Peak Trips Trips Parking Demand (ITE) Peak Periods (ITE) Code Require- ment Proposed Parking 988 75 88 235 11 PM to 6 AM 170 253 2,029 123 164 192 6 to 8 PM 300 507 266 6 22 20 25 22 11 AM to 8 PM 11 AM to 2 PM, & 6 to 8 PM 38 13 254 22 3,537 226 295 474 521 760 September 1st, 2015 18 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Former Public Works Site Traffic Impact Study The WSB Traffic Study suggests five improvements to address traffic concerns related to the redevelopment of this site. 1) Add new shared street from Arcadia to Vernon 2) Widen Arcadia to include a center turn lane, bike lane & sidewalk 3) Add signal or roundabout to Eden & Arcadia intersection 4) Add west bound turn lane on Vernon at Interlachen (along with signal changes) 5) Change signal timing at Vernon & Link At this time, only 1 & 2 are included in the 1 preliminary cost estimates. September 1st1 2015 19 , • I - • - • 0 Former Public Works Site Background — 5146 Eden Avenue 3.3 acres Tax-free since 1963 Vacant since 2010 .1*-511,7 Sei te erlst, 20 • .0.1.1'0.0% -a-7•-t7,: ,,•;., ...-;;;--- --. ... ,,.., N.., ..,„ z - .... .. , lot ,--,_;,,,- • ',t. ,- --,-, .... _ ,.-- ,,,,..' V • . , ill 0 to • 4{ ii , . • '1_114 fr, Located in mixed-use commercial district Centrally located in northern half of Edina Adjacent to railroad right-of-way Easy access to Highway 100 I. 21 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group September 1st, 2015 Former Public Works Site Background Images Preferred Images from Exploration Sessions 010 I 4VIIIIK,4-49 • . . • .• A ill s. L4. History Display FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Former Public Works Site Background Images Multi-Generational /Flexible Community Spaces from Discovery Session September 1", 2015 22 Program Elements for Multi-Generational, Multi- Pur • ose Communit Facilit 60,000+ SF in area 1 September • Arts education, training production • Visual media (painting, pottery, glass, metals) • Public galleries & event space • History display/exhibit • Multi-generational flexible spaces (large, medium and small community rooms) • Meeting space for community members and groups • Oversized lobby/lounges for community events • Largest community room designed as flexible, multi-purpose space o Up to 300 movable seats o Full variety of performances and events o Supported by lobby & back-of-house areas • Restaurant / café • Park-and Ride • Future transit connection to rail • 340 total parking stalls, minimum _ Former Public Works Site Background — for Reference Preferred Programming from May 2015 Work Session Sits OP Scenario #3 North Civic with South Residential (from May 2015 Work Session) 1st, 2015 23 FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Former Public Works Site Background — Conceptual Civic Program from May 2015 Net Area Gross Area (SF) Primary Use Description Net Area Gross Area (SF) 20,453 X-Large Community / Performance Space 7,846 1,700 seating for 300 4,000 700 control rooms 220 1,300 storage 160 800 cross-over 1,024 300 3,500 Front of House / Community Lounge 7,855 200 lobby 3,000 1,000 catering kitchen 800 1,000 rest rooms 800 1,000 coat room 200 1,000 concessions 220 810 Back of House 7,540 600 storage green room 500 Primary Use Description Studio Arts 1 Gallery 1 Large studio 4 small studios 2 specialized gift shop 1 pottery studio 1 metal arts 1 glass 1 photo/jewelry rental studio storage Edina History Center display, exhibit Multi-Generational Flexible Space 2 medium rooms 3,000 4 small rooms 800 1 lounge 800 Staff Offices 9,450 make-up / dressing 1,600 maintenance room 600 trash room 200 Mechanical room2200 control rooms 720 2,126 storage rooms 1,300 staff offices 600 open office 600 Total Program Gross SF 56,080 conference room 225 USE 60,000 SF Exterior spaces entry plaza 1,200 September 1st, 2015 24 kiln 6,500 PROPOSAL PREPARED FOR EDINA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT GRANDVIEW SITE FEASIBILITY STUDY LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY | DEPARTMENT OF ART EXPANSION | Farmville, Virginia TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 HGA OVERVIEW 02 PROPOSED TEAM 04 PROJECT EXPERTISE 25 REFERENCES 26 PROJECT APPROACH 29 PROPOSED FEE Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc. HGA Architects and Engineers, LLC HGA Architects and Engineers, LLP HGA Mid Atlantic, Inc. 420 North 5th Street, Suite 100 | Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Telephone 612.758.4000 | Facsimile 612.758.4199 www.hga.com October 9, 2015 Ann Kattreh, Parks and Recreation Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Grandview Site Feasibility Study Dear Ms. Kattreh: It is with great pleasure that we submit our proposal to provide programming and concept development for the City of Edina Grandview site. For your project, we have assembled a high-performance team of design professionals who bring proven experience in facilitation, fine and performing arts design, community center design and cost estimating. Our proposal highlights several distinguishing factors that position HGA as the best choice to realize your project goals. DESIGN EXCELLENCE: Community facilities serve as vibrant, interactive hubs to inspire healthy lifestyles, support community engagement and reflect a sense of place. Excellent design begins with a rigorous feasibility study. Our ability to assess the program and study your site, combined with our proven expertise, artful approach to design and commitment to innovation, allows us to bring beautiful and inspiring possibilities to reality. SPECIALIZED EXPERTISE: We have extensive experience and knowledge in the programmatic and technical requirements for community gathering, recreation and fine and performing arts spaces. These attributes are further supplemented by our in-house cost estimating department, ensuring an accurate cost assessment for our clients. TRADITION OF COLLABORATION: The nature of community facilities is to solicit input from a broad base of stakeholders, apply focused listening skills to fully understand the community’s aspirations and facilitate an organized process that will lead to consensus and informed decision making. Our design process and engagement with clients and communities encourages collaboration, imagination and visioning even on the tightest of timetables. HGA would be delighted to partner with the City of Edina to explore the possibilities and options for the Grandview site. If you should have any questions regarding our firm, our work, or if you need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Nancy Blankfard, AIA, LEED AP BD+C Vice President 612.758.4390 | nblankfard@hga.com MACALESTER COLLEGE | JANET WALLACE FINE ARTS CENTER | St. Paul, Minnesota 1 H G A O V E R V I E W HGA Architects and Engineers COMMITMENT TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES Founded in 1953, HGA is an integrated architecture, engineering and planning firm that provides comprehensive solutions that reflect the unique philosophy, culture and vision of each client. HGA’s commitment to non-profit facilities led to the formation of the Arts, Community and Education (ACE) practice studio. With a staff of 40, this studio specializes in the evaluation, planning and design of community, recreation and cultural facilities. COMMUNITY AND RECREATION Public gathering spaces are among the most challenging and exciting opportunities. Given our experience, it is our intent to provide leadership and assistance to help you create a facility that symbolizes and reinforces community identity—a place where people come together as a community for work and health. HGA excels in the collaborative process and encourages participation by various groups in the development process to plan, program and design a facility that captures the collective vision. Community recreation facilities are important to individual and collective health and wellness and provide places of respite in our fast-paced world. Whether enjoying educational classes, fitness programs, community events or recreational activities, our sense of spirit is uplifted when we can enjoy and celebrate life together with friends, family and members of our community. At HGA, we have the knowledge and experience to work with you in developing the type of facility that can offer the greatest versatility to respond to the needs of the community now and well into the future. ARTS FACILITY SPECIALISTS HGA’s nationally recognized fine and performing arts studio offers the advantage of a specialized team of architects, engineers and planners able to draw upon the substantial resources of a larger firm. The studio specializes in the evaluation, planning and design of fine arts education, practice and performance facilities and creating exceptional environments to cultivate creativity, welcome the community and foster excellence. We understand the highly specialized technical requirements for fine and performing arts buildings, such as the need for superb acoustics and sound isolation, as well as the unique requirements for student learning and performance. We have gone through the learning curve on many projects and bring expertise in the highly technical requirements of art, music, film, theatre and dance education, practice and performance facility design. FULL SERVICE While most architecture firms subcontract all disciplines, being part of a larger organization allows us to offer our clients complete support. Our full-service architecture, engineering and planning team strives to incorporate the most innovative and appropriate technical solutions to create lasting, protective and cost-effective environments. Clients achieve success through responsive, innovative and sustainable solutions resulting from a strong partnership with HGA’s interdisciplinary team. 1 FORD CENTER | HGA OFFICES | Minneapolis, Minnesota LEADERSHIP AND PERSONALIZED SERVICE The team leadership for this project consists of highly qualified individuals who have experience working with cities on similar projects. This leadership team represents the core leadership of HGA’s specialized practice in community center facilities. Nancy Blankfard, Victor Pechaty and Mark McDonald have the right set of complimentary abilities combined with a deep level of experience and expertise on this project type and a successful history of collaborations on similar projects. Our team will give you the personalized service you deserve coupled with highly specialized staff and resources that a large full-service firm offers. We know the unique and specialized needs of community center clients and understand the importance of energy efficiency, ease of maintenance, accessibility and security. Nancy Blankfard PRINCIPAL/PROJECT MANAGER | AIA, LEED AP BD+C Known for her expertise and commitment to design excellence, Nancy is a skillful collaborator who brings together diverse project teams and complex client structures while guiding the project clearly and effectively. As project manager, Nancy plays a dual role providing contract administration and supporting the internal HGA team with proper staffing and resources along with stakeholder and community facilitation. Nancy’s achievements have been recognized with numerous prestigious awards. She is the recipient of the Ralph Rapson Travel/Study Fellowship and the AIA Minnesota Young Architects Award. uu SELECTED EXPERIENCE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER AQUATICS PROGRAMS CONCEPT DESIGN AND AQUATICS ADDITION Eden Prairie, Minnesota CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER ASSESSMENT AND CONCEPT DESIGN Golden Valley, Minnesota CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY AND RECREATION CENTER CONCEPT DESIGN AND EXPANSION St. Louis Park, Minnesota CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER NEEDS ASSESSMENT Bloomington, Minnesota ST. PAUL ACADEMY | HUSS CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS St. Paul, Minnesota AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE NELSON CULTURAL CENTER Minneapolis, Minnesota UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA THE NEW NORTHROP Minneapolis, Minnesota MACALESTER COLLEGE JANET WALLACE FINE ARTS CENTER Saint Paul, Minnesota UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CENTER FOR DANCE Minneapolis, Minnesota uu EDUCATION / AFFILIATIONS MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE DEGREE Tulane University, 1993 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL Minnesota Proposed Team 3 P R O P O S E D T E A M Victor Pechaty PROJECT DESIGNER | AIA A senior project designer with 25 years of experience working through all phases of the design and construction process, Victor will be responsible for leading the design team and ensuring that your project vision is fully realized in planning and design. His background includes extensive experience in community and recreational facilities spanning a diverse range of community center programs including fitness, athletics, meeting/banquet facilities, studio arts, performing arts and other park and recreation needs. He will guide the team through the programming, concept development and cost estimating phases. uu SELECTED EXPERIENCE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER AQUATICS PROGRAMS CONCEPT DESIGN AND AQUATICS ADDITION Eden Prairie, Minnesota CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER ASSESSMENT AND CONCEPT DESIGN Golden Valley, Minnesota CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY AND RECREATION CENTER CONCEPT DESIGN AND EXPANSION St. Louis Park, Minnesota CITY OF MINNETONKA WILLISTON RECREATION CENTER ADDITIONS AND REMODELING Minnetonka, Minnesota* CITY OF ANDOVER AND ANDOVER YMCA COMMUNITY CENTER AND YMCA Andover, Minnesota* CITY OF MINNETONKA GLEN LAKE ACTIVITY CENTER Minnetonka, Minnesota CITY OF SAINT PAUL ARLINGTON HILLS COMMUNITY CENTER Saint Paul, Minnesota MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION BARRY FAMILY CAMPUS-SPACE PLANNING ASSESSMENT AND CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT Minneapolis, Minnesota *Prior to joining HGA uu EDUCATION / AFFILIATIONS MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ADVANCED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN (MSAAD) Columbia University Graduate School of Architecture, Planning, and Preservation, 1996 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL Minnesota Mark McDonald LEAD COST ESTIMATOR Mark has a proven track record of accurate estimating and work on projects. Under Mark’s leadership, our average percent of budget variance (over and under) is only 3.73%. He brings 30 years of experience as a cost estimator and project manager/field engineer to projects. Working closely with all members of the project team, he uses his expertise in the latest construction methods and practices to accurately assess all related costs. Mark is particularly adept at conceptual cost estimating and has many resources regarding market trends and future outlooks uu SELECTED EXPERIENCE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CENTER AQUATICS PROGRAMS CONCEPT DESIGN AND AQUATICS ADDITION Eden Prairie, Minnesota CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY AND RECREATION CENTER CONCEPT DESIGN AND EXPANSION St. Louis Park, Minnesota CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY CENTER NEEDS ASSESSMENT Bloomington, Minnesota CITY OF SHAKOPEE COMMUNITY CENTER ADDITION AND RENOVATION FEASIBILITY STUDY Shakopee, Minnesota AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE NELSON CULTURAL CENTER Minneapolis, Minnesota CABRILLO COLLEGE PERFORMING AND VISUAL ARTS CENTER AND STUDENT CENTER Aptos, California CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER Los Angeles, California CHAFFEY COLLEGE VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS VILLAGE Rancho Cucamonga, California PURDUE UNIVERSITY VISUAL AND PERFORMING ARTS CENTER West Lafayette, Indiana uu EDUCATION / AFFILIATIONS BACHELOR OF SCIENCE INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY University of Wisconsin-Stout, 1984 MINNESOTA CONCRETE COUNCIL Member 5 HGA-designed spaces Inspire and Build Community 55 P R O J E C T E X P E R T I S E HGA brings a depth of expertise in all of the program areas in which Edina Park and Recreation Department is exploring. The HGA team brings relevant and extensive experience in planning and designing cultural and recreation facilities. Our knowledge of arts and performance spaces is nationally recognized and will be leveraged to program and plan highly functional solutions. Our well conceived planning will result in beautiful and inspiring designs, inside and out, that will build excitement in your community. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK | COMMUNITY CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY | St. Louis Park, Minnesota 7 P R O J E C T E X P E R T I S E CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK | COMMUNITY CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY | St. Louis Park, Minnesota The St. Louis Park Community Center is a multi-generational facility designed to build upon and complement existing recreational amenities of Wolfe Park and in the community. The new program proposed a double gymnasium and associated track while expanding aquatics programming to include indoor lap swimming, water slide and pool climbing wall. The proposed building reaches beyond physical fitness alone and provides a vibrant meeting point for both daily and special events in the community. The feasibility study evaluated program square footage relative to potential building sites in the neighborhood and provided information for collaborative, next-steps visioning. FEASIBILITY STUDIES 8Commission No.: 2065-004-00 BROOKVIEW SITE PLAN CONCEPT New Parking Lot Future Expansion New Mini Golf Course New Putting Green Hole 10 Tee Driving Range Hole 1 Tee 18th Green 9th Green Main Entry Garden New Two-Story Building Covered Drop Off Roof Terrace Lawn Bowling Lawn Bowling New Putting Green Golf Cart Staging Golf Terrace Below Garden Garden GardenService Access Pond Pond Pond ExistingGolf Maintenance Building Pond Lawn Bowling Courts OVERALL SITE PLAN ENLARGED SITE PLAN N 9Commission No.: 2065-004-00 BUILDING FRAMEWORKS CONCEPT LOWER LEVEL Area Below Grade Service Access MAIN LEVEL Main Entry Garden w/ Trellis Above Garden Spaces Garden Spaces Garden Spaces Dining Patio Pro Shop Access Golf Terrace Covered Drop Off Lawn Bowling Events Terrace w/ Trellis Above Lobby Terrace Exterior Stair Access UPPER LEVEL Secondary Entry Secondary Entry Main Entry N CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY | COMMUNITY CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY | Golden Valley, Minnesota The vision for the community center was to provide an energized community attractor that would activate its site, expand seasonal use, increase current program offerings for all ages and demographics and help position Golden Valley as a vibrant and attractive 21st Century city. Through the Feasibility Study process, The city was able to inform and clarify this vision through an open and inclusive community- based process. HGA facilitated programming and design workshops with the Community Center Task Force, sought consensus among multiple stakeholders and presented design ideas for community center facilities on three sites. 9Commission No.: 2065-004-00 BUILDING FRAMEWORKS CONCEPT LOWER LEVEL Area Below Grade Service Access MAIN LEVEL Main Entry Garden w/ Trellis Above Garden Spaces Garden Spaces Garden Spaces Dining Patio Pro Shop Access Golf Terrace Covered Drop Off Lawn Bowling Events Terrace w/ Trellis Above Lobby Terrace Exterior Stair Access UPPER LEVEL Secondary Entry Secondary Entry Main Entry N FEASIBILITY STUDIES 9 P R O J E C T E X P E R T I S E CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE | COMMUNITY AQUATICS CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY | Eden Prairie, Minnesota The City of Eden Prairie owns and operates a vibrant multipurpose community center facility in Eden Prairie, Minnesota. The facility has grown with the community over the years, and last expanded in 1997, to accommodate additional fitness offerings. Currently, the city faces increasing and diverse demands for aquatics programming and has embarked on an exciting visioning, feasibility study and design process with HGA. HGA championed a grassroots process to gather information from numerous community stakeholders. Consensus was built around a project vision to carefully balance the needs of swimmers just getting comfortable in the water to those training competitively. The final project program and building design for the aquatics expansion includes two competitive lap pools; thoughtfully sized for maximum programming flexibility. Diving, wet locker rooms and dryland training areas are optimally sized and incorporated. Recreation and other special needs are served by a zero depth entry pool. A water slide connects to the recreational pool and is located on a prominent building edge to increase facility visibility and generate community excitement for the collective project vision. FEASIBILITY STUDIES MACALESTER COLLEGE | JANET WALLACE FINE ARTS CENTER | Saint Paul, Minnesota 11 P R O J E C T E X P E R T I S E MACALESTER COLLEGE | JANET WALLACE FINE ARTS CENTER | Saint Paul, Minnesota HGA collaborated with Macalester College on the multi- phase Janet Wallace Fine Arts Center to transform the music, theatre and fine arts buildings into a state-of-the-art visual and performing arts complex, anchored by a new light-filled, two- story arts commons. In Phase I (completed in 2012), the music building was reconfigured and expanded to provide a 318-seat concert hall, dedicated choral and instrument rehearsal spaces, individual practice rooms and teaching studios. The arts commons creates a front door to the arts that is connected to the campus. The central gathering space serves all the arts disciplines while providing a new art gallery, multimedia lab, classrooms and meeting rooms. The exterior envelope creates a more transparent and accessible identity for the arts. Phase II (completed in 2014), transforms the Art Department with new print making, drawing, pottery and sculpture studios. The Art Department is designed to the highest standards of art safety. HGA has been on the cutting edge of implementing exhaust, filtration and protection standards against hazards that exceed those in industrial and laboratory settings. Phase III—programmed and planned for future development of the theatre department—will include a theatre, rehearsal spaces, classrooms and faculty offices. FINE AND PERFORMING ARTS The design for the Nelson Cultural Center for the American Swedish Institute acknowledges the historic character of the adjacent Turnblad Mansion while creating a distinct architectural presence that considers contemporary and traditional Swedish aesthetics. The new wing, which includes the main lobby, café, gallery space, retail shop and event space, is light and airy, with two-story windows visually aligning with the Mansion and the original entrance. From the lobby, a glass corridor connects with the main mansion and carriage house. The Mansion’s lower level showcases a renovated gallery and provides much-needed classrooms and a community hall. AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE | NELSON CULTURAL CENTER | Minneapolis, Minnesota FINE AND PERFORMING ARTS 13 An essential part of the mission of SPA’s Fine Arts Program is to “provide a rich environment in which students can discover and develop their own creative potential.” The addition of the Performance Space and Great Hall to the campus will be instrumental in strengthening this clarity of purpose and the belief in community which is at the core of the SPA experience. Each successive addition to the Randolph Campus has been transformative in its impact—the next phase of expansion is a tremendous opportunity to bring greater clarity to this architectural history while setting a course for the future. SAINT PAUL ACADEMY AND SUMMIT SCHOOL | PERFORMANCE SPACE AND GREAT HALL | Saint Paul, Minnesota P R O J E C T E X P E R T I S E FINE AND PERFORMING ARTS The expansion of the Benedicta Art Center is composed of simple rectangular volumes clad in velvety bronze and red metal panels that draw their inspiration from the brick of the original 1963 center. The black box, music and dance building volumes are punctuated by transparent glass windows that glow from the activity within. An amphitheater has been created as an extension of the black box theater to provide a venue for theatre, music and dance performances. COLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT | BENEDICTA ARTS CENTER | St. Joseph, Minnesota FINE AND PERFORMING ARTS 15FINE AND PERFORMING ARTS The revamped Bedford Hall at Longwood University enables the Art Department to enhance academic performance in its growing graphic design, art education, photography, painting/drawing, crafts, art history and book arts/printmaking programs. The project includes a three-story 47,000 SF addition and 26,240 SF renovation and updates mechanical, electrical, ventilation and life-safety systems. Outside, the addition features a distinctive glass-walled gallery with vertical glass fins overlooking a reflecting pool. Inside, classrooms and lecture spaces vary from a 98-seat lecture hall to smaller flexible seminar rooms. Exhibition spaces include a formal student gallery to informal spaces in lobbies, circulation corridors and other gathering locations. LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY | DEPARTMENT OF ART EXPANSION | Farmville, Virginia P R O J E C T E X P E R T I S E CITY OF ANDOVER AND ANDOVER YMCA | COMMUNITY CENTER AND YMCA | Andover, Minnesota* 17 P R O J E C T E X P E R T I S E CITY OF ANDOVER AND ANDOVER YMCA | COMMUNITY CENTER AND YMCA | Andover, Minnesota* The Andover Community Center and YMCA is the result of a collaborative venture between the City of Andover and the Greater Twin Cities YMCA. The goal of the project was to build community through an emphasis on an active lifestyle and physical fitness. The 140,000 SF building program is built around three major athletic venues: an NHL-sized ice arena with spectator seating for 800, a fieldhouse with three 50’x84’ basketball courts, and an aquatics center with lap pool, recreational pool, water slides and aquatic play features. The architectural and engineering team worked collaboratively with a construction manager throughout the process from pre- planning and cost estimating through construction and final completion. The architecture uses several utilitarian materials in highly innovative ways to create a civic presence. The project was awarded a 2005 American Institute of Architects Honor Award for its innovative design. The ice arena is designed for year-round operation and is served by four team rooms; two of which have enhanced facilities and are occupied solely by the Andover High School varsity hockey team. The ice sheet is set 3’ below the ground floor level. This simple design decision allows for excellent views of all ice activities directly through the dasher board glass. The arena and the entire facility has become a central gathering place for Andover and surrounding communities. * Project designed by Victor Pechaty prior to joining HGA. COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTERS CITY OF SAINT PAUL | ARLINGTON HILLS COMMUNITY CENTER | Saint Paul, Minnesota This project is part of a transformational multi-block development in Saint Paul, Minnesota. One portion of the project which will consist of a replacement library for the Arlington Hills Library and a new Saint Paul Recreation Center. Lines between library and recreation center program areas have been blurred in an effort to eliminate single purpose spaces. Youth programs are planned to be more active and youth program areas—library collection and gym—will be co-located. Library and Rec Center Adult meeting rooms, restrooms and support services will also be collocated. Collocation allows for reduction in the overall building square footage required and increased operational efficiency. No room or area will be underutilized or vacant. Staff will provide services to meet both the needs for the recreation center as well as the library and excited for the programmatic opportunities which this presents. The library also incorporates such sustainable elements as solar glazing, a “cool” roof, 100 percent recyclable carpet tile, bioswales for site drainage, and durable materials that meet the City’s longevity standards for public buildings. This new community center, complete with soccer fields and community gardens will serve the diverse culture of this neighborhood and renew the community with respect to their unique history. COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTERS 19 CITY OF MINNETONKA | WILLISTON RECREATION CENTER EXPANSION AND RENOVATION | Minnetonka, Minnesota* The expansion and renovation to the City of Minnetonka Williston Recreation Center began with a comprehensive Feasibility Study. After multiple expansion and renovation options were reviewed, the city conducted a best-value analysis—cross referencing programmatic needs and financial stewardship of city resources—which led to the construction of two building additions and extensive interior renovation. The existing building housed a failing aluminum shell lap pool. The aquatics scope preserved the elegant wood-vaulted roof structure over the existing pool while demolishing the existing pool and outdated filtration systems. The existing pool liner was left in place and served as form work for a new concrete pool structure finished with a cementitious lining. A zero-depth entry shallow water pool was added in a new building expansion to the south providing a new amenity for families. A second addition replaced the building’s lower level entry with a new upper level lobby overlooking the existing tennis structure. Underutilized racquetball courts were repurposed with a new children’s climbing and fitness area and new fitness areas were added to the north. * Project designed by Victor Pechaty prior to joining HGA. P R O J E C T E X P E R T I S E COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTERS COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY | CORN CENTER FOR THE VISUAL ARTS AND RIVERSIDE THEATRE | Columbus, Georgia 21 R E F E R E N C E S References CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Jay Lotthammer, Director, Parks And Recreation City of Eden Prairie 952.949.8440 | jlotthammer@edenprairie.org AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE Bruce Karstadt, President and CEO American Swedish Institute 612.871.4907 | Brucek@ASImn.org CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Cindy Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation City of St. Louis Park 952.924.2541 | cwalsh@stlouispark.org CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY Rick Birno, Director Of Parks and Recreation City of Golden Valley 763.512.2342 | rbirno@goldenvalleymn.gov 21 We define success solely through the success of our clients. After the project is fully realized, does it meet and exceed the vision of the communities it serves? We believe there is no better endorsement of our work than the objective recommendation of our clients. We nurture long-term client relationships long after a project is complete and encourage you to contact our references who have recent experience working with our HGA team. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK | COMMUNITY AND RECREATION CENTER CONCEPT DESIGN | St. Louis Park, Minnesota VISIONING AND PROGRAMMING HGA proposes a kick-off workshop to initiate the visioning and program development phase. We use the term workshop to describe an intensive and inclusive working session with core stakeholders. This process will first define guiding principles and qualitative program needs and then transition to the quantitative metrics of occupant capacity and square footage requirements. The programming process will introduce questions based on the HGA team’s expertise in planning and design of arts and community center facilities and our ongoing review of emerging trends in multi-use facilities. This process of inquiry is intended to ensure that the functional potential of each program element is maximized and made specific to your needs. All results are tabulated and detailed graphic illustrations/ diagrams are created to accurately quantify and record each programmatic element. Specific area sizes, finishes and configurations are assigned to program areas and later cross-referenced with a cost estimate. The program is a living document subject to continued review and refinement throughout the process. The program developed by the team will serve as the foundation for concept plans on the site. SITE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN The Grandview site has unique characteristics that will affect optimal building layout. The HGA team will study and assess the technical opportunities and limitations of the site. The concept planning process begins with an analysis of key site characteristics such as planning/zoning criteria, topography, access and views. Project Approach Plan diagrams are developed based on the site analysis and desired internal building relationships. HGA utilizes a comparative method in conceptual design. Several design options may present themselves on the site. Committed to a transparent open book process, each feasible option is presented to the Edina Parks and Recreation Department during scheduled design team meetings. Together, architect and client will critique and evaluate the merits of each option en route to the optimal solution. Illustrative site plan, plan diagrams and 3D images are provided. COST ESTIMATING HGA offers in-house cost estimating to maintain a direct flow of accurate information between design professional and our cost estimators. HGA cost estimators utilize several comparative metrics to generate final cost estimates. Data is gathered from national and local databases of community center projects recently bid, HGA’s internal database of recently bid projects and ongoing communication with local contractor and sub-contractor entities. Anomalies are reviewed and reconciled to create an accurate cost estimate complete with construction cost escalation projections and project soft costs. FINAL REPORT The entire process, described above, will be aggregated into a final report. A successful product will provide comprehensive data for use by the Edina Parks and Recreation Department in a best value analysis of design options. 23 P R O J E C T A P P R O A C H SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE Design is a core value of HGA’s business. HGA implements leading-edge design concepts while meeting the needs of our clients with projects that range in cost, complexity and size. You receive the best of both worlds—the personalized service that a small firm provides coupled with access to highly specialized staff and resources that a full-service firm offers. The following information is based on our current understanding of the project. }Establish guiding principals and project goals }Develop a list of spaces needs and provide graphic illustrations }Review existing reports and data from client VISIONING AND PROGRAMMING SITE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN }Conduct a site analysis }Explore options that test fit program on project site }Refine preferred building plan diagram }Develop an exterior and interior image of preferred option FINAL REPORT }Document process and findings in a clearly written final report }Will include executive summary, space needs, site analysis, concept diagrams and cost estimate COST ESTIMATING }Develop construction cost estimates based on preferred option }Provide estimated project soft cost }NOVEMBER }DECEMBER }JANUARY }FEBRUARY LOUDOUN COUNTY | CLAUDE MOORE RECREATION CENTER | Sterling, Virginia 25 Proposed Fee Based on the project scope described in this proposal, HGA is pleased to offer our fee proposal for space planning and concept design for the City of Edina Grandview site. Our goal is to match the proposed services and fees with your precise needs. The following information is based on our current understanding of the scope of services. P R O P O S E D F E E VISIONING AND PROGRAMMING ESTIMATED TEAM HOURS 88 ESTIMATED COST $12,000 SITE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ESTIMATED TEAM HOURS 200 ESTIMATED COST $27,000 COST ESTIMATE ESTIMATED TEAM HOURS 40 ESTIMATED COST $6,000 FINAL REPORT ESTIMATED TEAM HOURS 40 ESTIMATED COST $4,800 TOTALS TOTAL TEAM HOURS 368 TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT $49,800 ESTIMATED REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES In addition to the lump sum fee for professional services, we anticipate reimbursable expenses for the project to include: }Mileage Expenses: $300 (includes in-town travel only) }Printing Expenses: $2,000 (includes printing costs for meetings, two printed copies and one electronic copy of final document) ESTIMATED REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES $2,300 “We selected HGA because of their great talent and their expressed passion for creating something very special for us that carefully complements the architectural landmark status of the Turnblad mansion.” —Bruce Karstadt, President/CEO, American Swedish Institute AMERICAN SWEDISH INSTITUTE | NELSON CULTURAL CENTER | Minneapolis, Minnesota 27 MINNEAPOLIS | MILWAUKEE | ROCHESTER | SACRAMENTO | SAN FRANCISCO | SAN JOSE | LOS ANGELES | WASHINGTON, DC Proposed Scope of Services 11/1/2015 Parks and Recreation Department City of Edina, MN Analysis & Recommendations for Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center Sutton + Associates, Inc. 528 Hennepin, Suite 215 Minneapolis, MN 55403 TEL (612) 840-1392 Ann Kattreh Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Ann, It is with pleasure that Sutton + Associates submits this proposal to work with HGA Architects and PROS Consulting to provide the City of Edina with a comprehensive analysis for a potential Community Arts & Recreation Center at the Grandview site in Edina. Sutton + Associates has been involved with the Edina Arts Center since the summer of 2012 helping to establish a new operational approach and assisting its leadership to examine the potential to better serve the residents of Edina at a more centralized location. As a team member in the four month process anticipated to start in mid-November, Sutton + Associates brings a clear understanding of EAC issues, a strong background in community arts facility development and continuity to the consideration of the potential of the Grandview site. We appreciate the opportunity to assist with this effort. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (612) 840- 1392. Sincerely, George Sutton Sutton + Associates, Inc. Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center Analysis 1 Sutton + Associates OVERVIEW The City of Edina’s Park and Recreation Department has assembled a team to analyze the potential for a Community Arts and Recreation Center at the Grandview site in Edina. Sutton + Associates would join HGA Architects and PROS Consulting to provide a comprehensive assessment of programming potential, related facility space needs, organizational structure, operational budget and development costs. The analysis will include identifying comparable organizations and facilities in the region and ascertaining key strategies to their success, as well as, best practices in their operations and programs. Further, a competitive analysis will identify market potential in the Greater Twin Cities area and the impact of demographic trends on future participation. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following scope of services outlines how Sutton + Associates will collaborate with HGA and PROS Consulting. For this project George Sutton will be assisted by Community Arts Organizer, Sara Shaylie. Projected completion date is the end of February, 2016. MARKET & COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: To better understand the competitive environment and market potential a comparative analysis of community Art Centers in the region will be undertaken. Consultants will work with PROS Consultants to identify at least 3 Minnesotan and 3 national centers that provide services to similar communities and outline specific aspects of their facility, program, legal structure and operation that are relevant to Edina. Benchmarks by which other communities and centers judge their success will be identified along with recommendations for the City of Edina. Consultant work will focus on specifically addressing the following points; What types of benchmarks are generally used to evaluate community arts related centers? Which communities have like Centers that are broadly viewed as successful? What makes them successful? Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center Analysis 2 Sutton + Associates What are their programming models and related fee structures? How are they organized? What are the sources and percentages of funding that support them? How do they market their programs? How does current EAC compare in terms of each of the above? PROGRAMMING PLAN: The Edina Art Center has a wide variety of visual arts programs and services. Sutton + Associates will work closely with EAC GM and team to determine a program plan for new art spaces and a list of potential arts partners. Consultants will review current program offerings, participation and cost structure at Edina Art Center. Relevant programming models at comparable centers will be provided along with an assessment of typical cost recovery rates by program. Potential partnerships that could allow expanded program offerings and potentially bring efficiencies will be examined. Consultants focus will be to address the following questions. What overall seem to be the best practices in comparable arts centers for generating community participation in programming? How does EAC compare? To achieve a stronger cost recovery percentage, are there current programs and service offerings that should be either expanded upon or no longer offered? What are EAC’s weaknesses and strengths in marketing and advertising? OPERATIONAL PLAN Sutton + Associates will work with project team to identify potential programming participation and recommended fee structure and to identify range of potential revenue sources. Requisite staff needs will be Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center Analysis 3 Sutton + Associates identified along with other operating cost considerations. Consultants will assess current operations and financials of the Edina Art Center to identify strengths and weaknesses and work with project team to recommend an operational plan with expanded programming and broader community impact. Cost structure of current programming to participants will be examined and compared to fees at like centers. Best practices for optimizing gift shop, art supplies, and other auxiliary revenue options will be provided based on observations of successes at like facilities. RECOMMENDATIONS In collaboration with other team members Sutton + Associates will review all analysis findings and make recommendations specific to programming, space planning and operational budgeting. Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center Analysis 4 Sutton + Associates QUALIFICATIONS The project contract will be with Sutton + Associates, Inc. who will be solely responsible for the delivery of all elements of the Scope of Services. The team of consultants assembled for the Edina Art Center project brings a unique blend of skills, experience and knowledge of the Greater Twin Cities Metropolitan Area as well as communities around the country. In their consulting practices the team has worked individually and together in a diverse range of communities across the country providing guidance to: Design, manage, and evaluate cultural programs and facilities Anticipate changes in demographics and cultural participation Balance civic purpose, artistic excellence, and financial stability Secure broad community engagement to guide and support important community cultural resources Listen to community stakeholders and institutional leadership Clarify and assess how new initiatives can fit within a community Focus a diverse range of community players around shared community assets and goals Forge strategic partnerships that get the right people behind an important plan and provide a solid foundation for success Ensure that the most pragmatically planned endeavors will still have the power to inspire Project Leadership Sutton + Associates, Inc. is a full service cultural and community-planning firm with the unique combination of creativity, experience, community leadership, and analytical expertise to carry major institutional initiatives from concept to reality. Led by George Sutton, a twenty-five year veteran of cultural and community planning, Sutton + Associates has successfully managed feasibility studies, operational planning, project conceptualization, and leadership cultivation efforts behind some of the country’s biggest community revitalization initiatives. From several million dollar projects to major multi-million dollar ventures, Sutton +Associates has Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center Analysis 5 Sutton + Associates a proven track record of providing reliable, sound planning leadership to complex cultural projects. Sutton’s ability to listen to an institution’s leadership and stakeholders, work with staff to assess how a new initiative will fit within the community, conduct smart analysis to determine costs, operational options, and feasibility, forge strategic partnerships, and get the right people behind an important plan provide a solid foundation for success. His creativity ensures that the most pragmatically planned endeavors will still have the power to inspire. Joined by a top-notch groups of business and cultural planning professionals, Sutton + Associates complements its own experience with teams of widely-respected cultural events planners, fund raising professionals, logistics experts, researchers, and community experts who lend creativity, sound judgment, and a collective 75 years of professional experience to Sutton + Associates’ resume. Team Member Profile Based upon the areas of work identified above, Sutton + Associates will engage Community Arts Organizer, Sara Shaylie to assist with this project. Sara Jean Shaylie brings twelve years of experience in the arts supporting campaigns, events and coordinating projects for Minnesota nonprofit and for-profit organizations. Ms. Shaylie has worked with Sutton + Associates on past projects including a recent comprehensive analysis of the Tulsa Performing Arts Center. Her extensive knowledge of public administration, executive administration, project management and research and communication skills will be a great asset to the Edina Analysis Project. Specific Vendor Requirements 1. Sutton + Associates, Inc. is a full service Cultural Facility Development consulting firm based in Minnesota and providing services in communities throughout the country. Sutton + Associates, Inc. 528 Hennepin Avenue Suite 215 Minneapolis, MN 55403 Tel (612) 840-1392 FAX (612) 605-4313 Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center Analysis 6 Sutton + Associates 2. Sutton + Associates nor any of the participating project partners have terminated or been terminated from any contracts within the past 24 months. 3. Sutton + Associates and the assembled team of specialist bring a long standing history of working both within the Minnesota arts community as well as around the country. Our experience with demographic and marketing analysis and business and feasibility planning for performing arts centers include a long list of venues including: PAC Comprehensive Analysis Tulsa Oklahoma Center for the Arts Jackson Hole WY Gallo Performing Arts Center Modesto, CA Minnesota Shubert Theater Minneapolis, MN State Theater Eau Claire, WI Mabel Tainter Memorial Theater Menomonie, WI Wilson Performing Arts Center Red Oak, IA Guthrie Theater Reuse Analysis Minneapolis, MN PAC Comprehensive Inventory Saint Paul, MN Ritz Theater Minneapolis, MN Jungle Theater Minneapolis, MN Intermedia Arts Minneapolis, MN Children’s Theater Minneapolis, MN Comprehensive analysis of multiple capital initiatives San Francisco, CA 4. Additionally, the team is experienced in working with and or for local and state governmental entities. Local and state governmental entities that consultants have worked with include: City of Saint Paul, MN City of Minneapolis, MN City of Red Wing, MN City of Santa Cruz, CA City of San Francisco, CA City of San Jose, CA City of New York, NY City of Brainerd, MN City of Duluth, MN City of Minot, ND City of Chicago, IL City of Philadelphia, PA City of Fort Lauderdale, FL City of Seattle, WA City of Portland, OR City of Tacoma, WA City of Tulsa, OK City of Fergus Falls, MN Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center Analysis 7 Sutton + Associates City of Los Angeles, CA City of Rochester, MI City of Yellow Spring, OH University of Minnesota, MN 5. Sutton + Associates nor any of the participating project partners see any conflict of interest with any party related to the proposed scope of services. 6. George Sutton of Sutton + Associates will have specific responsibility and oversight of all elements of the proposed work. REVISED Proposal: Grandview Community Center Feasibility Study & Business Plan Presented to the: City of Edina October 19, 2015 Prepared By: PROS CONSULTING 201 S. Capitol Avenue Suite 505 Indianapolis, IN 46225 877.242.7760 www.prosconsulting.com PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 1 PROS Consulting Firm Profile PROS Consulting is a small firm with a big presence in the field of management consulting for public entities and non-profit organizations. With a small team of highly professional and experienced consultants, PROS is a flexible firm that is agile to the evolving dynamics of the social, economic, and political environments our clients operate in. PROS is among only a small handful of firms that have tremendous experience in the field as practitioners and have become nationally recognized for helping to shape and further transform the industry of parks and recreation. The full name and location of the office that will be working on this project are: Full Legal Company Name: PROS Consulting, Inc. Years in Business: 20 (formed in 1995) Contact Information: 201 S. Capitol Avenue, Suite 505 Indianapolis, Indiana 46225 P: 877.242.7760; F: 877.242.7761 Contact: Leon Younger, President; 317.679.5615 leon.younger@prosconsulting.com Areas of Focus Management consulting and planning services offered by PROS span the full spectrum of planning needs for public agencies, and are grouped into the following practice areas: · Feasibility Studies and Business Planning – completed over 200 feasibility studies and business plans, often counseling our clients on how they can shape their projects and their vision around the reality of what is feasible and sustainable. · Operations, Maintenance and Organizational Development – completed over 450 plans that involved operations, programming, maintenance and organizational development components. · Financial Planning and Management – PROS is most renowned for providing the most innovative and proven methods for financial planning and management in the public sector with direct experience with over 150 proven ways to fund public parks, facilities and park systems. · Strategic Planning – completed over 80 strategic plans for cities, counties, park districts and state agencies to help them become established in their market or to reposition themselves. · Needs Assessment – completed over 250 needs assessments as a precursor of doing a Master Plan, Strategic Plan or Feasibility Study. We will perform a comprehensive parks, facilities and program needs assessment that helps identify importance and unmet needs for a variety of facilities / amenities and programs. · Master Planning – completed over 250 master plans for parks and park systems that have been successfully implemented and driven over $5 billion worth of capital investment. PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 2 Project Experience Orange Township, OH Community Center Needs Assessment (2012) LEWIS CENTER, OHIO In 2012, PROS Consulting completed a Community Center Feasibility Study for the residents of Orange Township for a 90,000 square foot community center. As part of the plan, analysis determined locations within the Township that would be most advantages to gain community support and awareness for such a facility. The process took five months to complete, and the components of the study included the following: · A demographic and Trend analysis of the current population, forecasted population, per capita income, age specific populations, household formations, trends analysis and the need for recreation services in Orange Township · Identification of the recreational programs and facilities that are offered to the public in the study area that included public, not-for-profit, and private suppliers · Analysis of the unmet needs in the area for recreation services · Identification of strategic partners in the study area and subgroups who would have an interest in a joint use facility such as seniors, athletic groups, healthcare organizations, educational groups & advocacy groups · Focus group meetings with key stakeholders in the Township · Creation of an organizational structure for the facility and a management plan · A statistically valid survey to determine community need and support for such a facility · Evaluation of existing programs in the region and analysis of program needs · Identification of the facility requirements for each of the programs needed in a comprehensive building program for the entire facility by room format · Evaluation of program needs for the park, as well as the location of the facility · An operating & capital cost plan that includes an estimate of construction costs based upon the building program · The development of operating costs for the building and how it could operate via various revenue sources · Public presentations and recommendations The proposed facility will feature an indoor family leisure pool, lap pool, gymnasiums, handball/racquetball courts, health/fitness, general program and Hospitality / Multi-Use / Seniors rooms. Additionally, the proposed site plan was designed to include a discovery garden, splash pad, trails/paths, tennis courts, event area, and a future outdoor aquatic center. Through a public participation process, it was determined that the desired programs included aquatics, sport introductory programs, youth life skills programs and outdoor recreation programs, day-time programming for young mothers, and competitive youth and adult leagues. Along with sport programs, there would be a balance of art, theater, and music programs, senior center activities, social events, and family-based programs. The goal of the feasibility study was to create a Center that was self-supporting, operating at a high cost recovery percentage. Project Reference: Mr. Scott Overturf, Project Manager; 3620 North High Street, Suite 306; Columbus, Ohio 43214; 614.204.1428; rpoturf@aol.com PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 3 Prince George’s County Southern Area Aquatics and Recreation Center Feasibility Study & Business Plan (2013) PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND In 2013, The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) desired a Southern Area Aquatics and Recreation Center (SAARC) feasibility study/business plan for a proposed new multi-generational recreational center located in the Brandywine area of Prince George’s County. The proposed multi-generational recreational center was developed jointly with the community through an agreement with the M-NCPPC. It will be M-NCPPC’s first multi- generational recreation center to be developed in accordance with new design and operational guidelines for regional community centers based on M-NCPPC’s Formula 2040: the Functional Master Plan for Parks, Recreation and Open Space, which was completed by PROS Consulting in 2013. As envisioned, this new regional facility will have components that can accommodate a range of leisure and recreational activities in one setting as expressed by individuals and families from various community input processes. The program spaces planned include an indoor aquatics center, fitness area, gymnasium, senior services and designated program spaces that can serve people of all ages. PROS Consulting was hired by M-NCPPC to lead the process that included developing the market assessment and the financial feasibility component of the project. Williams Architects provided the preliminary design concept plans, which included a footprint of the proposed building, location, site assessment, site plan, and cost estimates. ETC Institute provided the survey results that were used. The SAARC Feasibility Study and Business Plan was developed under the following guiding principles and desired outcomes: · Build a shared vision for a signature multi-generational recreation center facility in southern Prince George’s County that includes three main program spaces that include an aquatic center, gymnasium and fitness component, which includes additional program space to serve all age groups. · Utilize best practice means and trends to help meet the needs of current and future residents. · Focus on promoting a collaborative approach toward future development with the community. · Determine the optimal staffing structure and operational metrics to ensure maximum return on investment for M-NCPPC and the taxpayers of the County. Project Reference: Mr. Alvin McNeal, Prince George’s County Department of Parks and Recreation Deputy Director; 6600 Kenilworth Avenue; Riverdale, MD 20737; 301.699.2533; alvin.mcneal@pgparks.com Pro Forma Revenues & Expenditures M-NCPPC Southern Area Aquatics and Recreation Center BASELINE: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Revenues 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Passes $1,512,400.00 $1,557,772.00 $1,604,505.16 $1,652,640.31 $1,702,219.52 $1,753,286.11 Administration $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Building Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Building Services $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Recreation Programs $21,462.00 $22,105.86 $22,769.04 $23,452.11 $24,155.67 $24,880.34 Fitness $108,621.00 $111,879.63 $115,236.02 $118,693.10 $122,253.89 $125,921.51 Natatorium $562,425.00 $579,297.75 $596,676.68 $614,576.98 $633,014.29 $652,004.72 Gymnasium $199,803.00 $205,797.09 $211,971.00 $218,330.13 $224,880.04 $231,626.44 Parties $48,900.00 $50,367.00 $51,878.01 $53,434.35 $55,037.38 $56,688.50 Rentals $107,250.00 $110,467.50 $113,781.53 $117,194.97 $120,710.82 $124,332.14 Child Care $14,000.00 $14,420.00 $14,852.60 $15,298.18 $15,757.12 $16,229.84 Kitchen $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $2,574,861.00 $2,652,106.83 $2,731,670.03 $2,813,620.14 $2,898,028.74 $2,984,969.60 Expenditures 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Passes $52,200.00 $52,200.00 $52,200.00 $52,200.00 $52,200.00 $52,200.00 Administration $727,110.05 $767,959.05 $811,392.44 $857,589.88 $906,744.38 $959,063.24 Building Maintenance $158,410.00 $169,161.40 $180,706.31 $193,105.84 $206,425.94 $220,737.70 Building Services $192,833.38 $207,228.05 $222,740.51 $239,459.06 $257,479.03 $276,903.32 Recreation Programs $137,482.20 $146,255.69 $155,655.05 $165,727.71 $176,524.78 $188,101.38 Fitness $271,475.96 $287,472.13 $304,521.87 $322,700.50 $342,089.02 $362,774.52 Natatorium $859,628.34 $922,895.11 $991,021.49 $1,064,388.71 $1,143,408.20 $1,228,524.02 Gymnasium $114,309.80 $119,013.59 $123,931.05 $129,073.20 $134,451.75 $140,079.09 Parties $33,425.40 $34,975.43 $36,606.51 $38,323.45 $40,131.41 $42,035.87 Rentals $25,785.00 $27,197.80 $28,700.12 $30,298.27 $31,999.00 $33,809.60 Child Care $36,202.24 $39,048.42 $42,120.79 $45,437.41 $49,017.77 $52,882.91 Kitchen $2,750.00 $2,837.50 $2,928.03 $3,021.69 $3,118.60 $3,218.88 Total $2,611,612.37 $2,776,244.17 $2,952,524.17 $3,141,325.74 $3,343,589.89 $3,560,330.53 Total Cost Recovery 99%96%93%90%87%84% PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 4 Estes Valley Recreation & Park District, CO Community Recreation Center Feasibility Study (2014) ESTES PARK, COLORADO Estes Valley Recreation and Park District desired a feasibility study for an Estes Valley Community Recreation Center in partnership with the Town of Estes Park, Estes Park School District R-3, Estes Park Medical Center, and Estes Valley Public Library District. PROS Consulting completed the feasibility study of converting an old elementary school into a multi-generational center in July of 2014. EVRPD has pursued the concept of building a community center in three unsuccessful bond issue elections in 1994, 2001, and 2008; however, formal feasibility studies were not completed prior to any of the three previous bond issue attempts. The purpose of the feasibility study was to assist in providing information to the community and the proposed partners involved on the undertaking of a new EVCRC. As such, the intended outcome was for the partners to be well-versed on all aspects of the project in order to make informed decisions about their desired needs; the sustainability of the proposed design when considering the proposed site location and existing structures; and, the requirements necessary to accomplish the project with available resources. The partnerships for the EVCRC would create a business consortium that would pool collective resources to offer recreation, health, and wellness that include medical, education, athletic, and social services in one facility for residents, area employers, and visitors. The facility would serve as a catalyst in the community when delivering recreation and other community functions in several disciplines. The facility would also become an integral part of a larger community campus that includes the future development of Stanley Park, Stanley Fairgrounds, and the Town of Estes Park Museum and Senior Center. The diagram below illustrates how this planning process unfolded to produce the recommendations for the EVCRC: Project Reference: Mr. Skyler Rorabaugh, Executive Director; Estes Valley Recreation & Park District; 690 Big Thompson Avenue; Estes Park, CO 80517; 970.586.8191; skyler@evrpd.com Pro Forma Revenues & Expenditures ESTES VALLEY COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER BASELINE: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES SERVICE TITLE Revenues Expenditures Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Cost Recovery - Percent Passes $989,500.00 $52,200.00 $937,300.00 1896% Administration $0.00 $540,110.05 ($540,110.05)0% Building Maintenance $0.00 $158,410.00 ($158,410.00)0% Building Services $0.00 $192,833.38 ($192,833.38)0% Recreation Programs $31,080.00 $102,427.50 ($71,347.50)30% Fitness $112,630.00 $223,881.36 ($111,251.36)50% Natatorium $410,225.00 $859,628.34 ($449,403.34)48% Gymnasium $192,210.00 $154,826.00 $37,384.00 124% Parties $37,500.00 $22,925.40 $14,574.60 164% Rentals $65,700.00 $24,285.00 $41,415.00 271% Child Watch $14,000.00 $36,202.24 ($22,202.24)39% Kitchen $0.00 $2,750.00 ($2,750.00)0% Partnerships $226,500.00 $0.00 $226,500.00 Total $2,079,345.00 $2,370,479.27 ($291,134.27)88% Data Collection and Needs Analysis Strategic Partners & Stakeholder Strategy Public Participation Program Identification Facility Building Program Capital & Operating Cost Financing & Operating Pro Forma Public Presentation & Final Report PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 5 City of Westerville, OH Multi-Generational Recreation Center Senior Expansion Feasibility Study WESTERVILLE, OHIO In 2014, as part of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan, the PROS Consulting Team worked with the City of Westerville to develop Feasibility Study for a proposed recreation center expansion of the existing Westerville Community Center. The Community Center expansion included the inclusion of the Senior Center, which they would relocate from a different location, as well as the expansion of the fitness center, gymnasium, aquatics, and indoor track. The PROS Team completed the following components as part of the feasibility study/business plan: · Community Input (focus groups, public forums, stakeholder interviews, surveys) · Market Analysis (Demographic and Recreational Trends Assessment) · Vision and Core Program of the Expansion · Operational Standards & Staffing Plan · Conceptual Plans · Financial Feasibility / Pro Forma Development · Final Report Briefings and Development The PROS Team presented the findings and outcomes in a strategic process, built upon examining the most innovative, effective and sustainable opportunity for the Parks and Recreation System for the next generation. With the expansion of the Community Center and moving the Senior Center to one large Multi-Generational Community Center, the City desired the facilities to achieve a higher cost recovery goal, moving from 60% to 84%. Project Reference: Mr. Randy Auler, Director of Westerville, OH Parks & Recreation Dept.; 350 N. Cleveland Ave.; Westerville, OH 43082; 614.901.6504; randy.auler@westerville.org Revenues 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Passes $1,399,855.46 $1,441,851.13 $1,485,106.66 $1,529,659.86 $1,575,549.66 $1,622,816.15 Administration $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Building Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Building Services $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Recreation Programs $39,010.00 $40,180.30 $41,385.71 $42,627.28 $43,906.10 $45,223.28 Fitness $460,450.00 $474,263.50 $488,491.41 $503,146.15 $518,240.53 $533,787.75 Natatorium $651,750.00 $671,302.50 $691,441.58 $712,184.82 $733,550.37 $755,556.88 Gymnasium $95,940.00 $98,818.20 $101,782.75 $104,836.23 $107,981.32 $111,220.75 Parties $37,500.00 $38,625.00 $39,783.75 $40,977.26 $42,206.58 $43,472.78 Rentals $101,100.00 $104,133.00 $107,256.99 $110,474.70 $113,788.94 $117,202.61 Child Care $24,500.00 $25,235.00 $25,992.05 $26,771.81 $27,574.97 $28,402.21 Vendateria $10,000.00 $10,300.00 $10,609.00 $10,927.27 $11,255.09 $11,592.74 Senior Center $97,000.00 $99,910.00 $102,907.30 $105,994.52 $109,174.35 $112,449.59 Total $2,917,105.46 $3,004,618.63 $3,094,757.19 $3,187,599.90 $3,283,227.90 $3,381,724.73 Expenditures 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Passes $167,511.80 $167,511.80 $167,511.80 $167,511.80 $167,511.80 $167,511.80 Administration $929,768.37 $953,474.21 $978,122.73 $1,003,751.48 $1,030,399.49 $1,058,107.36 Building Maintenance $209,245.37 $210,756.77 $212,322.48 $213,944.48 $215,624.83 $217,365.68 Building Services $250,730.60 $252,137.60 $253,589.63 $255,088.15 $256,634.68 $258,230.78 Recreation Programs $127,520.01 $128,605.01 $129,726.66 $130,886.22 $132,085.01 $133,324.37 Fitness $478,972.74 $481,977.74 $485,101.29 $488,348.08 $491,723.00 $495,231.10 Natatorium $692,151.45 $694,773.95 $697,490.93 $700,305.84 $703,222.29 $706,244.01 Gymnasium $33,384.00 $33,654.00 $33,933.90 $34,224.07 $34,524.89 $34,836.76 Parties $32,925.40 $33,949.40 $35,013.16 $36,118.24 $37,266.24 $38,458.85 Rentals $27,185.00 $27,791.00 $28,419.74 $29,072.08 $29,748.93 $30,451.21 Child Care $33,268.72 $33,298.72 $33,329.62 $33,361.45 $33,394.23 $33,427.99 Vendateria $5,700.00 $5,878.00 $6,061.62 $6,251.04 $6,446.45 $6,648.03 Senior Center $806,563.00 $811,753.25 $817,137.60 $822,723.41 $828,518.31 $834,530.25 Total $3,794,926.45 $3,835,561.44 $3,877,761.15 $3,921,586.33 $3,967,100.15 $4,014,368.20 Net Revenue ($877,820.99)($830,942.82)($783,003.96)($733,986.43)($683,872.25)($632,643.46) Total Cost Recovery 76.9%78.3%79.8%81.3%82.8%84.2% PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 6 Muskingum Recreation Center, Indoor Pool Feasibility and Business Plan Study (2009) ZANESVILLE, OHIO Muskingum Recreational Center, a 501(C)3 partnership, contracted with PROS Consulting in August of 2009 for consulting services to analyze the feasibility of a recreational facility (Muskingum Recreation Center, or MRC). The original four entities which funded the Partnership for this endeavor are: Ohio University- Zanesville, Genesis HealthCare System, Muskingum County Community Foundation, and the Muskingum Family Y. The goal of this project was to complete a feasibility analysis and business plan for the recreational facility in a comprehensive manner so that all entities of the Partnership had complete clarity of the potential for sustainability. The scope of this project spanned the physical and operational aspects of the proposed facility, including: · Program analysis · Site analysis · Conceptual layout · Operations analysis · Potential partners · Project funding analysis The ultimate outcome of the project was twofold – to provide a roadmap for the Partnership that bridges the planning and development stages, carrying forward into the operational phase, and to utilize the program and concept development to inform the community about the benefits and value the MRC will have in terms of quality of life, community satisfaction, and community recruitment. As a result of a feasibility study conducted by Williams Architects and PROS Consulting, Williams Architects is currently designing a Multi-Generational Recreation Center / Indoor Pool Facility located at Ohio University – Zanesville Campus. The MRC facility will contain: Racquetball Courts, Eight (8) Lane 25M Lap and 25Y Competition Lap Pool, Leisure and Therapy Pool, Health / Fitness / Wellness, Group Exercise / Studio Rooms, Multi-Purpose Rooms, Walking Track, associated Locker / Changing Facilities and general support spaces. The MRC is a collaboration of public and private partnerships between Ohio University - Zanesville, Genesis Healthcare System, The Muskingum County Foundation and the Zanesville YMCA. Construction is estimated to be completed in Spring 2014. Project Reference: Ms. Beth Chapman, Executive Director of Muskingum Recreation Center; 3620 Court Dr. #1; Zanesville, Ohio 43701; 740.454.4767; bchapman@genesishcs.org or Mr. Jim Fonseca, Dean of Ohio University-Zanesville; 740.588.1489 PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 7 Monon Community Center Feasibility Study (2001) and Business Plan (2010) CARMEL, INDIANA Set in a new park envisioned to be the “Jewel” of the Carmel-Clay park system, the Monon Center features an indoor natatorium containing a leisure depth pool and a six-lane, non-competition lap pool; a three-court gymnasium; health/fitness areas; an indoor children’s play zone; a café; flexible lobby space; administrative offices; program rooms; and a banquet room with a catering kitchen – are augmented by amenities contained in the facility’s accompanying, 3.5-acre, 2,098-capacity outdoor aquatic center. The amenities present in the finished project reflects input gleaned from a year-long series of public forums. Designed to serve as an “anchor” to the inter-urban Monon Trail, the Center features an enclosed pedestrian bridge that spans the trail and links the passive, dense, mature forested areas of the site to the east, and active programming spaces in the open meadows of the site to the west of the Center. Client: Carmel Clay Parks & Recreation, City of Carmel 1055 Third Avenue Carmel, IN 46032 Project Size: 160 Acre Park 146,000 SF Recreation Ctr. 2,200 Bather Aquatic Fac. Estimated Project Construction Cost: $52,000,000 Actual Project Cost: $51,957,000 Completion Date: May 2007 PROJECT SERVICES: Feasibility Study Public Input and Bond Programming Master Plan Basic Architectural Serv. Construction Administration Aquatic Design / Engineering Interior Design PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 8 Following completion of the feasibility study in 2001 completed by the PROS/Williams Architects Team, in 2010 the Carmel/Clay Board of Parks and Recreation again contracted with the PROS Consulting to complete a Business Plan, as well as a Marketing Plan for The Monon Community Center. PROS worked closely with Carmel Clay Parks & Recreation management and staff to develop an understanding of the business plan project and outcome expectations, as well as access the current operating practices and key issues facing The Monon Center. The ultimate outcome of the business plan was to provide a true measurement of The Monon Center’s ability to meet the financial and operating expectations of the Park Board, elected officials, and the Carmel Clay community. Throughout the business planning process three themes, or critical issues, emerged. These critical issues which the business plan was formulated upon were: · A true measurement of realistic revenue capacity of the facility · The ability to affectively link the facility design and program in a manner to optimize operational revenues to cover operational expenses · To create a balance of the level of services provided to the value received with corresponding pricing The original feasibility study and conceptual design of the Monon Center and Central Park was performed in conjunction by the PROS Consulting/Williams Architects Team. Last year’s attendance was 591,296, including nearly 9,400 year-round members and day pass sales. The center has an operating budget of over $4.5 million and has been self-sufficient since 2010. Through the business plan, the Monon Community Center has moved from a cost recovery of 75-80% to self-sufficiency. Project Reference: Mr. Michael Klitzing, Parks and Recreation Assistant Director; 1235 Central Park Drive East; Carmel, IN 46032; 317.573.4018; mklitzing@carmelclayparks.com Facility/Space Rentals; Top-20 Rental Spaces, by Hours Total Rentals Total Hours Average Hours per Rental Rank Assessment Room 392 1,545.0 3.94 1 Dance Studio 1,090 1,016.6 0.93 2 Gymnasium C 633 811.3 1.28 3 Fitness Studio B 971 789.7 0.81 4 Conference Room West 72 505.0 7.01 5 Meeting Room 154 415.8 2.70 6 Banquet Room A 111 394.5 3.55 7 Gymnasium B 206 349.2 1.69 8 Fitness Studio A 353 297.5 0.84 9 Indoor Lap Pool 3 324 256.0 0.79 10 Indoor Lap Pool 1 333 207.0 0.62 11 Computer Lab 60 164.0 2.73 12 Party Room A 77 154.3 2.00 13 Indoor Leisure Pool 3 298 151.5 0.51 14 Program Room C 105 146.7 1.40 15 Program Room A 113 142.8 1.26 16 Indoor Lap Pool 2 180 135.0 0.75 17 Program Room B 105 119.5 1.14 18 Banquet Room -All 3 83 108.8 1.31 19 Computer & Meeting R 39 100.5 2.58 20 PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 9 City of Grapevine, Texas Community Activities Center Expansion Feasibility Study & Business Plan (2012) GRAPEVINE, TEXAS In 2012, PROS Consulting formed a team consisting of Barker Rinker Seacat, as well as Water Tech, Inc. to complete a feasibility study/business plan for the 48,000 square foot facility that opened in 1996. The City of Grapevine desired a feasibility study/business plan for the expansion/renovation of the Community Activities Center that would include additional programming space, an increase in the square footage of the weight/fitness area, an added indoor aquatic component, as well as senior programming expansion. The diagram below illustrates how this planning process unfolded to produce the recommendations for the Community Activities Center Business Plan: By providing an objective analysis of the market and optimal management plan provided, created a viable financially stable CAC to meet the needs of the local market and the economic and financial expectations of the City. The updated Community Activities Center will be a great addition to the many public assets available to Grapevine residents. After expansion, the renovated Community Activities Center will be nearly 110,000 square feet. It will meet best practice standards for indoor community center space for residents of Grapevine. The Community Activities Center will have a balance between programmed and open use space based on programming in the building consuming 65% of the time available. The Community Activities Center has the capability to generate additional operating revenue that the pro forma presents, if the City Council feels it is appropriate for the future. A facility based on the new projected square footage can easily achieve 70% to 80% of its full operating costs if desired. The 110,000 square foot facility opened in 2015 and has exceeded the feasibility study’s cost recovery goals. Project Reference: Mr. Doug Evans, Former Parks and Recreation Director; 1175 Municipal Way; Grapevine, TX 76051; 817.992.9340; dandlevans@verizon.net Community Input Market Analysis Conceptual Design Management Strategy / Financial Plan Feasibility / Business Plan Development PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 10 City of Olathe, KS Recreation Center Feasibility Study & Business Plan(2013) OLATHE, KANSAS In 2012, the City of Olathe contracted with PROS Consulting, ETC Institute, Barker Rinker Seacat, as well as Water Tech for consulting services to analyze the feasibility of developing a Community Recreation Center in Olathe as well as to develop a business plan for the facility if developed by the City. The goal of the planning project was to complete a feasibility analysis and business plan for the proposed new recreational facility in a comprehensive manner so that all key leaders and decision makers had complete clarity of the potential for financial sustainability of the facility. The scope of the project spanned the physical and operational aspects of the proposed recreation center facility, including: · Program analysis · Site analysis · Conceptual layout · Operations and financial analysis · Demographic and Trend assessment · Competition assessment · Project funding analysis · Business Plan development The ultimate outcome of the project was to provide a roadmap for the City that bridges the design, planning and development stages of the project into the operational phase and a management plan for the Community Recreation Center. The 72,000 square foot facility opened Mid 2014 and has exceeded the feasibility study’s cost recovery goals. Project Reference: Mr. Brad Clay, Deputy Director; Olathe Parks & Recreation; 100 E. Santa Fe Street; Olathe, KS 66051; 913.971.8618; bclay@olatheks.org Pro Forma Revenues & Expenditures OLATHE RECREATION CENTER BASELINE: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Revenues 1th Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Passes $1,537,977.14 $1,584,116.46 $1,631,639.95 $1,680,589.15 $1,731,006.82 $1,782,937.03 Administration $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Building servicesenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Building Services $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Recreation Programs and fitnes $36,190.00 $37,275.70 $38,393.97 $39,545.79 $40,732.16 $41,954.13 Fitness $614,942.00 $633,390.26 $652,391.97 $671,963.73 $692,122.64 $712,886.32 Natatorium $181,300.00 $186,739.00 $192,341.17 $198,111.41 $204,054.75 $210,176.39 Gymnasium $40,180.00 $41,385.40 $42,626.96 $43,905.77 $45,222.94 $46,579.63 Parties $37,500.00 $38,625.00 $39,783.75 $40,977.26 $42,206.58 $43,472.78 Rentals $101,100.00 $104,133.00 $107,256.99 $110,474.70 $113,788.94 $117,202.61 Child Care $22,320.00 $22,989.60 $23,679.29 $24,389.67 $25,121.36 $25,875.00 Kitchen $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Vendateria $10,000.00 $10,300.00 $10,609.00 $10,927.27 $11,255.09 $11,592.74 Total $2,581,509.14 $2,658,954.42 $2,738,723.05 $2,820,884.74 $2,905,511.28 $2,992,676.62 Expenditures 1th Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Passes $71,400.00 $71,400.00 $71,400.00 $71,400.00 $71,400.00 $71,400.00 Administration $723,196.70 $740,146.50 $757,768.74 $776,090.16 $795,138.54 $814,942.80 Building servicesenance $130,410.00 $131,921.40 $133,487.11 $135,109.11 $136,789.46 $138,530.31 Building Services $160,509.13 $161,241.13 $161,997.91 $162,780.32 $163,589.26 $164,425.64 Recreation Programs and fitnes $91,173.00 $93,225.56 $95,352.42 $97,556.33 $99,840.11 $102,206.72 Fitness $591,834.56 $609,598.17 $628,070.67 $647,280.37 $667,256.71 $688,030.30 Natatorium $464,082.54 $468,865.04 $473,828.42 $478,979.59 $484,325.75 $489,874.36 Gymnasium $39,006.00 $39,476.00 $39,963.90 $40,470.39 $40,996.18 $41,542.02 Parties $33,425.40 $34,469.40 $35,553.96 $36,680.67 $37,851.17 $39,067.18 Rentals $25,785.00 $26,335.00 $26,905.50 $27,497.28 $28,111.13 $28,747.90 Child Care $33,268.72 $33,298.72 $33,329.62 $33,361.45 $33,394.23 $33,427.99 Kitchen $2,750.00 $2,837.50 $2,928.03 $3,021.69 $3,118.60 $3,218.88 Vendateria $5,700.00 $5,878.00 $6,061.62 $6,251.04 $6,446.45 $6,648.03 Total $2,372,541.05 $2,418,692.42 $2,466,647.89 $2,516,478.38 $2,568,257.59 $2,622,062.14 Total Cost Recovery 109%110%111%112%113%114% PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 11 Resumes Leon Younger PROS Consulting President Education M.P.A., University of Kansas, Aug. 1988 B.S., Kansas State University, May 1975 Employment History President, PROS Consulting, Sep. 1995 to present Director/Chairman of the Board, Indianapolis Parks and Recreation, Apr. 1992 to Sept. 1995 Executive Director, Lake MetroParks (OH), Jun. 1988 to Mar. 1992 Director, Jackson County (MO) Parks and Recreation, Aug. 1983 to Jun. 1988 Certification Certified Park and Recreation Professional Professional Experience · Founder and President of PROS Consulting · More than 30 years in parks, recreation, and leisure services · Recognized leader in applying innovative approaches to managing parks and recreation organizations · Held positions as Director of Parks and Recreation in Indianapolis, Indiana; Executive Director of Lake Metroparks in Lake County, OH (Cleveland vicinity); and Director of Parks and Recreation in Jackson County, MO (Kansas County) · Received the 1994 National Park and Recreation Association’s Distinguished Professional Award for his progressive and innovative thinking in management of public parks and recreation entities, as well as induction into the NRPA Legends Hall of Fame · Co-creator of the Community Values ModelTM, a business model that synthesizes public input into a strategic plan · Regularly addresses sessions at the National Park and Recreation Conferences and has served as a board member and instructor at the Pacific Revenue and Marketing School in San Diego, California and the Rocky Mountain Revenue and Management School in Colorado Similar Project Experience · Estes Valley Recreation & Park District, CO Community Recreation Center Feasibility Study · Riverside County, CA Regional Park & Open Space District Aquatic Facility Operational Impact Report · Prince George’s County, MD Regional Multi-Purpose Community Center Feasibility Study · City of Olathe, KS Recreation Center Feasibility Study and Business Plan · Blue Valley Recreation Commission (Overland Park, KS) Strategic Plan & Needs Assessment · Shawnee County, KS Long Range Parks and Recreation Strategic Master Plan · City of Kansas City, MO Recreation Community Facilities Operational Plan · Carmel, IN Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Master Plan · City of Westerville, OH Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan · City of Westerville, OH Senior Center Expansion Feasibility Study · Orange Township, OH Community Center Needs Assessment and Feasibility Study · Leon County, FL Sports Complex and Field House Feasibility Study · Northbrook, IL Park District Regional Recreation Center Feasibility Study · Tropical Park (Miami Dade County, FL) Business Plan · City of Aspen, CO Recreation Division Operations Audit and Business Plan Development · City of Grapevine, TX Community Center Expansion Feasibility Study and Business Plan PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 12 Michael Svetz PROS Consulting Senior Project Manager Education B.S., Miami University, 1990 M.S., Miami University, 1991 Employment History Consultant, PROS Consulting; 2012 to present Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Goodyear, Arizona; 2009 to 2012 Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Charlottesville, Virginia; 2004 to 2009 Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Strongsville, Ohio 2000 to 2004 Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Strongsville, Ohio 1997 to 2000 Recreation Supervisor, City of Brunswick, Ohio 1991 to 1997 Professional Experience · 21 years of experience in parks and recreation at the local government level · Managed development and operations of $18 million, 157,000 sq. ft. Community Recreation Center in Strongsville, Ohio · Managed construction and development of $25 million in capital improvements in 3 years resulting from PROS Consulting Strategic Plan in Charlottesville, Virginia. Projects include: $10 million Aquatic and Fitness Center, $6 million Outdoor Aquatic Complex, $9 million in park and trail development as well as land acquisition · Oversight of the development and operations of $103 million Spring Training Complex in Goodyear, Arizona · Board of Director, Ohio Parks and Recreation Association 1997-2004 · President, Strongsville Community Foundation 2003-2004 · Board of Director, Virginia Recreation and Parks Society 2007-2009 · Vice President, Arizona in Action, Present Similar Project Experience · Managed the development and operations o $18 million, 157,000 sq. ft. Community Recreation Center in Strongsville, Ohio o $25 million in capital improvements in Charlottesville, Virginia. Projects include: $10 million Aquatic and Fitness Center, $6 million Outdoor Aquatic Complex, $9 million in park and trail development as well as land acquisition o $103 million Baseball Spring Training Complex in Goodyear, Arizona o 50,000 square feet community recreation center in Brunswick, OH · Estes Valley Recreation & Park District, CO Community Recreation Center Feasibility Study · Washington DC / Prince George’s County, MD Regional Multi-Purpose Community Center Feasibility Study · City of Westerville, OH Community Recreation Center Expansion Feasibility Study · City of Napa, CA Senior Center Feasibility Study & Business Plan · City of Pasadena, CA Sports Field Strategic Plan and Parks Maintenance Management Plan · Santa Clara County, CA Cost Recovery and Pricing Plan · City of Kansas City, MO Garrison Community Center Business Planning Services · Prince George’s County, MD Regional Community Center Feasibility Study · City of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Park Zero Based Budget Review · City of Grandview, MO Aquatic Complex and Park Feasibility Study Development · City of Aspen, CO Recreation Division Business Plan PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 13 Jeffrey J. Bransford PROS Consulting Senior Project Manager Education M.P.A., Clemson University, May 2005 M.S., Clemson University, May 2005 B.S., Texas A&M University, May 2002 Employment History Senior Consultant, PROS Consulting August 2013 to Present Associate Director, Eppley Institute for Parks and Public Lands, Indiana University, Mar. 2009 to Aug. 2013 Associate Director, Center for Park Management, National Parks Conservation Association, Jun. 2006 to Feb. 2009 Management and Business Analyst, National Park Service, Jun. 2005 to Jun. 2006 Certification Project Management Professional (PMP) Certified Park and Recreation Professional (CPRP) Professional Experience · More than 15 years in parks, recreation, and leisure services · Experienced project manager, management consultant, business analyst, professional trainer, and strategic planner · Served as project manager or lead analyst for over 55 park and recreation projects · Held positions as Financial Analyst for the Center for Park Management and Business Plan Consultant for National Park Service · Coordinated visitor programs at the Supreme Court of the United States from 2002-2003 · Served as Policy Fellow for U.S. Secretary of Agriculture in 2002 · Worked as Park Ranger and Park Guide for numerous seasons with National Park Service · Received National Award for Excellence from the National Society for Park Resources in 2002 · Author of numerous research reports and peer-reviewed articles on park visitor management and operations Similar Project Experience · City of Edina, MN Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan · City of Columbus, OH Recreation Center Operations Plan · Baton Rouge, LA (BREC) Recreation Center Operations Plan · City of Kansas City, MO Recreation Division Operational Business Plan · CityArchRiver 2015 & Jefferson National Expansion Memorial (MO) Maintenance Management Plan, Strategic Plan & Business Plan · City of Warrensburg, MO Parks and Recreation master Plan · City of Kansas City, MO Parks and Recreation Master Plan · City of Kentwood, MI Parks and Recreation Business Plan · Toledo, OH Metroparks Strategic Business Plan · Shawnee County, KS, Parks and Recreation Master Plan · Cummins Employee Recreation Association Financial Sustainability and Master Plan · Carmel Clay (IN) Parks and Recreation Compensation Assessment · Everglades National Park Fee Operations Analysis · Cuyahoga Valley National Park Revenue Feasibility Study · Valley Forge National Historical Park Business Plan · Statue of Liberty National Monument Concession Management Compliance Audit · City of Louisville, KY, Southwest Greenways Master Plan and Public Survey PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 14 Terry Schwartz PROS Consulting Strategic Consultant Education Ed.D., Northern Illinois University, Dec. 1996 M.A., Northeastern Illinois University, May 1991 B.S., Southern Illinois University, May 1978 Employment History Consultant, PROS Consulting 2014-Present Executive Director, Winnetka, IL Park District, 2009-2014 Superintendent of Citywide Services, City of San Francisco, 2005-2009 Studio Director, Councilman-Hunsaker, 2002-2005 Professional Consultant, PROS Consulting, 1996-2002 Executive Director, Glen Ellyn, IL Park District, 1993-1996 Superintendent of Revenue Facilities, Arlington Heights, IL Park District, 1983-1993 Director of Recreation, Champaign, IL Park District, 1978-1983 Superintendent of Recreation, Alton, IL Park and Recreation Dept., 1974-1978 Professional Experience · Thirty five years as a park and recreation professional with diversified experiences as an organization leader, educator and consultant: · Significant experience when managing parks and open space, enterprise funds, recreation programs and the financial management of special districts and public park and recreation organizations · A business mindset when developing and managing organizational budgets, a broad range of special use facilities and special events · Notable abilities when speaking in public open meeting settings, conducting community process and leading organizations Similar Project Experience · Feasibility Study, Recreation Center, Batavia Park District, Batavia, IL · Feasibility Study, Recreation Center, New YMCA, Morris County, NJ · Facility Planning, Recreation Center Space Planning, Batavia Park District, Batavia, IL · Feasibility Study, Recreation Center, Lake Park High School, Medinah, IL · Indoor Athletic Complex Feasibility Study, Waukegan Park District, Waukegan, IL · Audit and Feasibility Study, City of Worcester, Worcester, MA · Feasibility Study, Recreation Center, Ottawa Township High School, Ottawa, IL · Feasibility Study, Long Branch School District, Long Branch, NJ · Feasibility Study, State of Delaware, Dover, DE · Feasibility Study, Grand Forks Park District, Grand Forks, ND · Feasibility Study, City of Boonville, Boonville, MO · Strategic Planning, Collinsville Area Recreation District, Collinsville, IL · Feasibility Study, Batavia Park District, Batavia, IL · Master Plan, Park and Facility Audit, City of Mesa, AZ · Park and Facility Audit, City of Sarasota, FL · Strategic Planning, Cary Park District, Cary, IL · Strategic Planning, Lemont Park District, Lemont, IL · Strategic Planning, Oregon Park District, Oregon, IL · Strategic Planning, Bloomingdale Park District, Bloomingdale, IL · Strategic Planning, Pleasant Dale Park District, Bur Ridge, IL · Strategic Planning, Collinsville Area Recreation District, Collinsville, IL PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 15 Scope of Services The process of developing the feasibility study and design services follows a logical planning path as described in the Scope of Work and illustrated below: Task 1 – Data Collection and Market Analysis A. Kick-off Meeting/Data Collection – The first task will establish the framework and outcome expectations associated with the feasibility study. Included in this task will be a kick-off meeting led by the prime consultant; the kick-off meeting should be attended by the key city of Edina stakeholders and staff members to confirm project goals, objectives, and expectations that will help guide actions and decisions of the consultant team. The role of PROS in this task includes: · Review Existing Information, Reports, and the existing facilities – The PROS Team will review and discuss with key city management and staff existing programs and operational issues at the current facilities, as well as the current market, other services providers, customer base and key findings and themes in relevant reports that have been done over the past several years if available. Also, a review of quality and conditions of amenities within facilities will be completed. B. Demographic Analysis – The PROS Team will complete a demographic trends analysis which is based on Census 2000 baseline data, 2010 reported data, and projected populations for next five and ten years. Demographic characteristics analyzed and reported on will include population, age and gender distribution, households, and income characteristics. Also, the effect of demographic changes for the facilities being discussed will be researched. This analysis will provide an understanding of the demographic environment for the following reasons: To understand the market areas which are potentially served by the existing facility and potential new facilities to determine changes and assist in making proactive decisions to accommodate those shifts. C. Service Provider Analysis – The PROS Team will analyze all major direct and indirect service providers. Direct and indirect service providers will be based on typical services/programs administered in like facilities. This data will be utilized to compare against the activities and programs identified in the Market Definition. An inventory of comparable facilities will be performed on a local basis to attempt to quantify market share. An analysis of competition will include: location, service offering, pricing, and attractions. D. Market Definition – The PROS Team will confirm the size of the market by age segment and race/ethnicity for the study area. Detailed demographic analysis will be compared to potential recreational activities to estimate potential participation per national and local trends, as Data Collection and Needs Analysis Market Analysis Key Leadership Interviews Program Identification Facility Building Program Capital & Operating Cost Financing & Operating Pro Forma Public Presentation & Final Report Comparative of Programming Co u r t S p o r t s Fi t n e s s Ca r d i o / F r e e W e i g h t s Aq u a t i c s Se n i o r s Li f e S k i l l s Yo u t h Te e n s Re n t a l s Ch i l d C a r e Sp e c i a l E v e n t s Fitness Centers Parkpoint Health Club x x x x x x x Healdsburg Health and Fitness x x Curves x x Healdsburg Pilates & Personal Fitness x x Yoga on Center x x Childcare Centers Live Oak Preschool x x x Pine Tree School-Preschool x x x Healdsburg Montessori School x x x Little Lambs Preschool x x x Saint John the Baptist School x x x Fitch Mountain State Preschool x x x Healdsburg Community Nursery School x x x PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 16 documented in the Sports & Fitness Industry Association’s (SFIA) Study of Sports, Fitness and Leisure Participation market research data, as well as ESRI Local Market Potential. This will help to determine the size of the activity market by age segment and frequency rates that can be applied to the facility. These figures will serve as the basis for participation and revenue projections of the facilities. Deliverables: A kick-off meeting and a data assessment of the market will be developed along with a report on the condition of the existing facilities will be provided. The PROS Team will prepare a market analysis report that summarizes the above referenced information: identify specific areas of deficiencies that currently exist within the public, non-profit, and the private sectors in the study area. The summary report will also identify specific areas of deficiency, duplication, and opportunities for collaboration and shared services. Task 2 – Community and Stakeholder Public Input The foundation of all projects should be built upon an inclusive input process. This project’s input process will be based on qualitative data gleaned from leadership and city stakeholder meetings. The PROS Team will work with the prime consultant to utilize contacts and relationships of the City of Edina to identify stakeholders and leaders to gather input in order to gain consensus on key development priorities and operational strategies and programs. A. Stakeholder Interviews – The PROS Team will support the prime consultant in conducting up to six (6) interviews or focus groups with key community stakeholders to evaluate the vision for the facility. The community values, strengths and challenges potentially facing the facility, trends, and existing level of services provided will also be evaluated during this time. These interviews and focus groups will identify vision, values, and key issues and provide insight into facility and program needs, usability issues, and opportunities. While PROS has a preference to attend and support the facilitation of these interviews under the direction of the prime consultant, PROS has the flexibility to focus their scope on providing review, critique, and comment on the written outcomes of these meetings. B. Operational Interviews – The PROS Team will conduct up to six (6) interviews or focus groups with city staff, key operational partners, user groups, educational groups, and other select individuals to evaluate the operational requirements of the proposed facility. The content of these meetings will relate directly to the unique needs that need to be considered for the facility to inform program delivery, operational standards, maintenance levels, staffing requirements, etc. The prime consultant has the option of attending the interviews and can provide review, critique, and comment on the written outcomes of these meetings. Task 3 – Program Identification A. Visioning and Core Program – Utilizing the community and stakeholder input, demographic analysis, service provider analysis, and market definition, the PROS Team will support the prime consultant in identifying the recommended core programs for the facilities. This will include key activities and programs for participants, as well as the potential size of the core program and market positioning. Program identification could include: recreation, sports, therapy, enrichment, fitness and wellness, family activities, arts, education, aquatics, active adults, boomers, and seniors. PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 17 This information can be presented in a Visioning Session with key management and staff to finalize a recommended program plan from which the concept, spatial analysis, and operational and finance plan will be created. This core program will drive the components and design of the facilities including the sizes of each program space in the building to achieve maximum flexibility and revenue return as well as any other site evaluated. Task 4 – Facility Building Program The PROS Team will support the prime consultant by interpreting the findings of Tasks 1-3 into information that can be used by the prime consultant to develop a conceptual facility design and spatial relationship. This task is often performed in conjunction with Task 5. This collaborative planning process where program and space are jointly formulated can yield a representative model where the interrelationship of program and space and associated choices and consequences can be directly illustrated. PROS will provide ongoing review, comment, and critique of work products developed by the prime consultant during this Task to ensure a highly-coordinated and informed site assessment, space allocation plan, and conceptual building design illustration. Task 5 – Operational Plan A. Operational Plan – The PROS Team will analyze management practices and limitations to understand the operational situation of the facilities, as well as long term maintenance needs. This analysis will provide support for a future organizational structure and staffing requirements, and strategies for operational efficiency, policy development, system and technology requirements, and marketing/communication capabilities. Also, operational standards will be established and costs for the facility based on full operations. This will include hours of operation, staffing levels needed, technology requirements and customer service requirements based on established and agreed upon outcomes. Where appropriate, personnel standards as dictated by all state and/or local codes and ordinances will also be determined based on the design and program of the facilities. B. Financial Plan/Pro-Forma – Based on the program, operations, and conceptual plan for the facilities, the PROS Team will develop a detailed financial plan illustrating pricing strategy for each of the programs and services. The detail financial plan would include a space utilization summary based on detailed line item projections and detailed participation by program area. Financial modeling will be completed in Microsoft Excel; a fully functional version of the electronic model will be provided to the City for future use as a budgeting and planning tool. The electronic financial model, fully linked and functional with the ability to project and model dynamic scenarios, will include: · Expenditure detail: Detailed staffing by space/program area; Contractual costs, including but not limited to, utilities, maintenance and repair, insurance, office/license/dues, advertising and promotion; Commodity costs for program area and general facility requirements; Contract instructor/officiating costs · Revenue and participation detail: General admission by month of year, by participant category and price point (youth, adult, weekday, weekend, etc.); Program/class participation by session/meetings, by participant category ; Rental by space/program area by price point Pro Forma Revenues & Expenditures OLATHE RECREATION CENTER BASELINE: REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES Revenues 1th Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Passes $1,537,977.14 $1,584,116.46 $1,631,639.95 $1,680,589.15 $1,731,006.82 $1,782,937.03 Administration $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Building servicesenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Building Services $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Recreation Programs and fitnes $36,190.00 $37,275.70 $38,393.97 $39,545.79 $40,732.16 $41,954.13 Fitness $614,942.00 $633,390.26 $652,391.97 $671,963.73 $692,122.64 $712,886.32 Natatorium $181,300.00 $186,739.00 $192,341.17 $198,111.41 $204,054.75 $210,176.39 Gymnasium $40,180.00 $41,385.40 $42,626.96 $43,905.77 $45,222.94 $46,579.63 Parties $37,500.00 $38,625.00 $39,783.75 $40,977.26 $42,206.58 $43,472.78 Rentals $101,100.00 $104,133.00 $107,256.99 $110,474.70 $113,788.94 $117,202.61 Child Care $22,320.00 $22,989.60 $23,679.29 $24,389.67 $25,121.36 $25,875.00 Kitchen $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Vendateria $10,000.00 $10,300.00 $10,609.00 $10,927.27 $11,255.09 $11,592.74 Total $2,581,509.14 $2,658,954.42 $2,738,723.05 $2,820,884.74 $2,905,511.28 $2,992,676.62 Expenditures 1th Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Passes $71,400.00 $71,400.00 $71,400.00 $71,400.00 $71,400.00 $71,400.00 Administration $723,196.70 $740,146.50 $757,768.74 $776,090.16 $795,138.54 $814,942.80 Building servicesenance $130,410.00 $131,921.40 $133,487.11 $135,109.11 $136,789.46 $138,530.31 Building Services $160,509.13 $161,241.13 $161,997.91 $162,780.32 $163,589.26 $164,425.64 Recreation Programs and fitnes $91,173.00 $93,225.56 $95,352.42 $97,556.33 $99,840.11 $102,206.72 Fitness $591,834.56 $609,598.17 $628,070.67 $647,280.37 $667,256.71 $688,030.30 Natatorium $464,082.54 $468,865.04 $473,828.42 $478,979.59 $484,325.75 $489,874.36 Gymnasium $39,006.00 $39,476.00 $39,963.90 $40,470.39 $40,996.18 $41,542.02 Parties $33,425.40 $34,469.40 $35,553.96 $36,680.67 $37,851.17 $39,067.18 Rentals $25,785.00 $26,335.00 $26,905.50 $27,497.28 $28,111.13 $28,747.90 Child Care $33,268.72 $33,298.72 $33,329.62 $33,361.45 $33,394.23 $33,427.99 Kitchen $2,750.00 $2,837.50 $2,928.03 $3,021.69 $3,118.60 $3,218.88 Vendateria $5,700.00 $5,878.00 $6,061.62 $6,251.04 $6,446.45 $6,648.03 Total $2,372,541.05 $2,418,692.42 $2,466,647.89 $2,516,478.38 $2,568,257.59 $2,622,062.14 Total Cost Recovery 109%110%111%112%113%114% PROS CONSULTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND BUSINESS PLANNING SERVICES 18 Pricing strategies would be based on a ten (10) step process which highlights the level of exclusivity received by the participant and the value of experience provided. The detailed financial plan will be included as a deliverable to provide management and staff the ability to affectively plan and budget for future years. In addition to the line item detail and summary schedules for revenues, expenditures, and debt service, this model will provide a five-year pro forma and cash flow for budgetary purposes. Deliverables: The PROS Team will analyze management practices and limitations to understand the operational situation of the facilities, as well as long term maintenance needs. An operating pro-forma will be prepared that includes a detailed analysis of building and program expenses and specific revenue sources from citizens, businesses, user groups, or other interested groups. The detailed financial plan will include a space utilization summary based on detailed line item projections and detailed participation by program area. Financial modeling will be completed in Microsoft Excel (version 2007 or later); a fully functional version of the electronic model will be provided to the City for future use as a budgeting and planning tool. Task 6 – Draft Report, Presentations and Final Report Based on the analysis and findings, the PROS Team will support the prime consultant in the assembly of a report document that clearly and succinctly states the programmatic, physical, and operational elements required to achieve the outcome expectations. A. Draft Report Production – The feasibility study will establish a definitive direction for the City. The plan will be one that generates energy and advocacy while providing confidence in the business practices required for success. A draft plan will be developed and distributed to key management, City Advisory Commission, and staff. B. Presentation of Findings and Recommendations – The PROS Team will present the draft Feasibility Study findings and recommendations over a one (1) day period for comment and review. Presentations will be made to the City Council, Parks Board, and other advisory or steering committees. C. Final Report Production – Following consensus on the draft analysis and recommendations, the PROS Team will help prepare the final report documenting all findings, analysis and recommendations to support implementation. Timeframe PROS Consulting can complete the study in four (4) months. Detailed dates for meetings and milestones will be outlined during the kick-off meeting. Fees If PROS is selected as a subconsultant working under the direction of a prime consulting architecture firm, PROS fee would be $27,500 including expenses for two trips. Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Request f or Purchase: Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Approve consulting prof essional services agreements f or the Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study: HGA, Inc., Pros Consulting and Sutton + Associates. INT RODUCT ION: Staf f would like to partner with HGA, Pros Consulting and Sutton + Associations to complete a thorough and detailed operational and feasibility study f or a potential community f acility at Grandview. Request f or Purchase and consulting proposals are attached. AT TACHMENT S: Description Request for Purchase - Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study Professional Services Agreement - HGA Professional Services Agreement - Pros Consulting Professional Services Agreement - Sutton + Associates City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Tuesday, November 17, 2015 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study Oct. 15, 2015 (HGA) Oct. 18, 2015 (Pros Consulting) Nov. 2, 2015 (Sutton + Associates) NA HGA Pros Consulting Sutton + Associates $52,100 $27,500 $12,500 Recommended Quote or Bid: HGA, Pros Consulting and Sutton + Associates Information/Background: In order to continue to further refine the concept of a “Community Facility” at Grandview, staff recommends completing a detailed operational and feasibility study. The preliminary work that has been completed needs further study, research and refinement before the Parks & Recreation Department staff and Park Board are able to make a recommendation to the City Council on facility and programmatic components of a Grandview community facility. Staff was directed to select a consulting team to assist with the facility operational feasibility study. Staff began to identify possible partners and funding sources for a thorough and detailed study and ultimately is recommending the following experts in the areas of planning, design and estimating; operational analysis and arts programming. Planning, Design & Estimating Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, Inc (HGA) came very highly recommended as a potential partner and Project Lead for the feasibility study. HGA recently completed feasibility studies for the cities of Minnetonka, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Eden Prairie and Bloomington for new community centers or community center additions/renovations. HGA has an impressive REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 resume of community center and performing and visual arts facilities including the Janet Wallace Fine Arts Center at Macalester College, Nelson Cultural Center at the American Swedish Institute, Saint Paul Academy, College of Saint Benedict, and Longwood University, to name a few. The scope of HGA’s work will include four phases: Visioning and Programming; Site Analysis and Conceptual Design; Cost Estimating; and Final Report. HGA has a staff of 40 and specializes in the evaluation, planning and design of community, recreation and cultural facilities. Feasibility, Operational Analysis & Pro Forma Pros Consulting was selected to complete the operational analysis of the feasibility study, including a business plan. The Park Board and Parks & Recreation Department staff recently worked with Pros on the Park, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan. Pros Consulting scope of work contains six stages: Data Collection and Market Analysis; Community and Stakeholder Public Input; Program Identification; Facility Building Program; Operational Plan; Draft Report, Presentation and Final Report. The Operational Plan will include revenue and expense details, financial modeling and pro formas. Pros will work with HGA and an Edina task force to study programmatic needs and interests and determine the operational feasibility of each programmatic component. Arts Analysis Sutton + Associates were selected to complete the arts analysis portion of the study. Sutton + Associates have been involved with the Edina Art Center since 2012 when they completed an analysis of the operations of the current Art Center. The Sutton + Associates scope includes: Market and Comparative Analysis; Programming Plan; Operational Plan; and Recommendations. The data provided by Sutton + Associates will be included in the overall feasibility study and business plan completed by Pros Consulting. Sutton will study the Twin Cities arts market, in addition to the Edina market to determine which arts components are needed and desired in Edina and which will be supported and successful components at Grandview. Staff believes that the team of HGA, Pros and Sutton + Associates provides an exceptional compliment to the Edina team of city staff, Park Board, Arts & Culture Commission, School District staff and Edina resident resources. Val Burke, Director of Community Education for Edina Public Schools has generously offered her time and expertise to assist with the study. Edina Parks & Recreation and Community Education staff believe that significant consideration and study should go into how Parks & Recreation and Community Education can best partner on programming, facilities and staffing initiatives at a new Grandview community facility and in general. The challenge of this study will be to recommend a multi- generational community facility that meets the current and future needs of all Edina REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 3 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 residents, adds significant community value, combines resources, and replaces aging and dated facilities and/or programs. Operational and Feasibility Study Project Costs: HGA $52,100 Pros Consulting $27,500 Sutton + Associates $12,500 Total $92,100 Funding Sources $82,100 of this project will be funded by the Parks & Recreation Department budget with funding from 2015 and 2016. $10,000 will be funded by the 2016 Art Center budget. At the completion of this analysis, staff will be confident in recommending a proposal to the Park Board and City Council and will provide a detailed programmatic recommendation with corresponding facility components and also pro formas to support the proposal. HGA will also provide an exterior and interior image of the final product, including cost estimates for construction. If approved, the study will start at the beginning of December and will take four months to complete. The City Council has requested the next Grandview facility update to take place by May 2016. City Attorney Roger Knutson prepared Professional Services Agreements. 1 184362v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ______ day of ______________, 2015, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC., a Minnesota business corporation ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant to prepare a Grandview Site Feasibility Study. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement. B. Proposal Prepared for Edina Parks and Recreation Department Grandview Site Feasibility Study. In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “B” having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Consultant and the Consultant shall accept as payment $52,100.00 inclusive of reimbursables, taxes and all other charges (the “fee”). This fee shall not be adjusted if the estimated hour to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed upon receipt of an invoice from the Consultant. 4. OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, software, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City shall be the copyright owner. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by 2 184362v1 a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the services provided by Consultant herein and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising from the performance of Consultant hereunder. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy. Before commencing work the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by subcontractor within ten days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County 3 184362v1 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 17. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 4 184362v1 19. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall pay the Consultant for completed work. Dated: __________________, 2015 CITY OF EDINA BY: _______________________________ James Hovland, Mayor BY: ________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Dated: __________________, 2015 HAMMEL GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC. BY: _______________________________ Its ________________ 1 184363v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ______ day of ______________, 2015, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and PROS CONSULTING, INC. CORPORATION, a Minnesota business corporation ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant to prepare a Grandview Community Center Feasibility Study and Business Plan. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement. B. Revised Proposal: Grandview Community Center Feasibility Study and Business Plan, October 19, 2015. In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “B” having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Consultant and the Consultant shall accept as payment $27,500.00 inclusive of reimbursables, taxes and all other charges (the “fee”). This fee shall not be adjusted if the estimated hour to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed upon receipt of an invoice from the Consultant. 4. OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, software, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City shall be the copyright owner. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by 2 184363v1 a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the services provided by Consultant herein and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising from the performance of Consultant hereunder. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy. Before commencing work the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by subcontractor within ten days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County 3 184363v1 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 17. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 4 184363v1 19. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall pay the Consultant for completed work. Dated: __________________, 2015. CITY OF EDINA BY: _______________________________ James Hovland, Mayor BY: ________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Dated: __________________, 2015 PROS CONSULTING, INC. CORPORATION BY: _______________________________ Its ________________ 1 184361v1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this ______ day of ______________, 2015, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and SUTTON & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Minnesota business corporation ("Consultant"). IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant to prepare a comprehensive analysis for a potential community arts & recreation center at the Grandview site in Edina. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement. B. Analysis & Recommendations for Edina Community Arts & Recreation Center, proposed scope of services, 11/1/2015. In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document “A” having the first priority and Contract Document “B” having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Consultant and the Consultant shall accept as payment $12,500.00 inclusive of reimbursables, taxes and all other charges (the “fee”). This fee shall not be adjusted if the estimated hour to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed upon receipt of an invoice from the Consultant. 4. OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, software, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City shall be the copyright owner. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by 2 184361v1 a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees, of and from any and all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, including costs and attorney's fees, arising out of or by reason of the execution or performance of the services provided by Consultant herein and further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising from the performance of Consultant hereunder. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy. Before commencing work the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by subcontractor within ten days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County 3 184361v1 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 17. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 4 184361v1 19. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the City shall pay the Consultant for completed work. Dated: __________________, 2015. CITY OF EDINA BY: _______________________________ James Hovland, Mayor BY: ________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Dated: __________________, 2015 SUTTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. BY: _______________________________ Its ________________ Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: VII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2015-116: Final Plat & Tree Preservation Easement 6209 Crest Lane for Ridge Creek Homes Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Adopt Resolution No. 2015-116. INT RODUCT ION: On October 6th, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat. The Final Plat is the same as the approved Preliminary Plat. The applicant has met the conditions of approval of the Preliminary Plat including submittal of a grading and drainage plan that has been approved by engineering, and drafted a tree preservation easement protecting mature trees along the south lot lines. The applicant worked with staff to create the tree preservation easement. Staff, including the city f orester, met with the applicant on the site to determine which trees should be preserved. The result is Exhibit B, in the attached resolution, which shows the trees to be protected within the easement. The city attorney has reviewed and approved the easement. The attached resolution would approve both the final plat and the tree preservation easement. AT TACHMENT S: Description City engineer review memo Tree Preservation Easement Resolution No. 2015-116 Preliminary Plat Grading & Drainage Plan Eldridge 8th Addition DATE: November 6, 2015 TO: Cary Teague – Community Development Director CC: Chad Millner PE – City Engineer FROM: Ross Bintner PE – Environmental Engineer RE: 6029 Crest Lane – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject development for street and utility connections, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. General Comments 1. Provide copies of private maintenance and inspection agreement at time of building permit to ensure the continued function of any stormwater retention systems constructed onsite. Survey/ Plat 2. No Comment Traffic and Street 3. Application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut, Follow standards in curb cut permit application: http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Public_Works/CurbCutApplication.pdf Sanitary and Water Utilities 4. A full width (curb to curb / saw-cut to saw-cut) repair of Crest Lane will be required when installing the new sanitary sewer and water service connections. 5. SAC and WAC fees will need to be paid prior to building permits being issued. Storm Water Utility 6. Revised proposal with two front yard filtration basis has meet the following standards to ensure no increase in downstream flood risk: a. Limit flow to NMC_90 to the maximum extent possible. b. No increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private properties for the 100-year Atlas 14 design storm. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 7. No Comment Other Agency Coordination 8. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit may be required, along with other agency permits such as MNDH, MPCA, MCES, and a grading permit from the City of Edina Building Department. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-116 APPROVING A FINAL PLAT AND TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT AT 6209 CREST LANE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Ridge Creek Custom Homes, on behalf of Sharon and Lee Harrison is proposing to subdivide the property at 6209 Crest Lane into two lots. 1.02 The existing home would be removed. 1.03 Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 22,278 square feet, median lot depth is 176 feet, and the median lot width is 126 feet. 1.04 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lots 14 and 15, Block 3 Valley View Heights, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.05 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called “parcels”) described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Eldridge 8th Addition. 1.06 To accommodate the request the following Variances were granted: 1. Lot width variances from 126 feet to 108 feet for each lot. 1.07 On September 9, 2015, the Planning Commission motion to approve the subdivision and variances failed. Vote: 4 Ayes and 4 Nays. 1.08 On October 6, 2015, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed subdivision. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat and Variances on a Vote of 3-2. Resolution No. 2016-116 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed Final Plat is the same as the approved Preliminary Plat. 2. The applicant worked with staff to create a tree preservation easement to protect the trees along the south lot lines as directed by City Council. Staff, including the city forester, met with the applicant on the site to determine which trees should be preserved. The result is Exhibit B which shows the trees to be protected within the easement. 3. The applicant submitted a grading and drainage plan that has been reviewed and approved by the engineering department. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Plat and the Tree Preservation easement at 6209 Crest Lane. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Compliance with the conditions required by the engineering memo dated September 2, 2015. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district’s requirements. b. A curb-cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. e. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. 3. Staff files the tree preservation easement protecting the mature trees along the south side of both lots. 4. The first floor elevations of each of the two new homes shall not exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home. Resolution No. 2016-116 Page 3 Adopted this 17th day of November, 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2015. _________________________________ City Clerk 1 2 B L O C K 1 F I L T R A T I O N B A S I N 2 B O T = 9 2 2 9 . 5 T O P = 9 3 1 . 0 0 6 " P V C D R A I N T I L E I E = 9 2 8 . 0 0 C O N N E C T T O 6 " S T O R M B E H I N D C U R B P E R C I T Y S T A N D A R D S , F I E L D V E R I F Y C O N N E C T I O N D E P T H S . F I L T R A T I O N B A S I N 1 B O T = 9 2 2 9 . 5 T O P = 9 3 1 . 0 0 R O O F A R E A S T O D R A I N T O F R O N T T I P D R I V E W A Y S T O D R A I N T O B A S I N S R O C K C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E S I L T F E N C E I N L E T P R O T E C T I O N A T A N Y D O W N S T R E A M C B ' S R E C E I V I N G R U N O F F F R O M S I T E SILT FENCE I S S U E / S U B M I T T A L S U M M A R Y D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N ELDRIDGE 8TH ADDITION 6209 CREST LANE, EDINA, MN 7777 WASHINGTON AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55439 RIDGE CREEK CUSTOM HOMES PROJECT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 / 4 / 1 5 C I T Y S U B M I T T A L 1 1 / 4 / 1 5 C I T Y R E S U B M I T T A L . . . . 4 9 3 1 W . 3 5 T H S T . S U I T E 2 0 0 S T . L O U I S P A R K , M N 5 5 4 1 6 C i v i l S i t e G r o u p . c o m M a t t P a v e k P a t S a r v e r 7 6 3 - 2 1 3 - 3 9 4 4 9 5 2 - 2 5 0 - 2 0 0 3 4 4 2 6 3 M a t t h e w R . P a v e k L I C E N S E N O . D A T E I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L E N G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . 1 1 / 4 / 1 5 D E N O T E S E X I S T I N G F E N C E D E N O T E S E X I S T I N G E L E V A T I O N . D E N O T E S D I R E C T I O N O F D R A I N A G E 0 1 " = 2 0 ' - 0 " 2 0 ' - 0 " 1 0 ' - 0 " N D E N O T E S S I L T F E N C E D E N O T E S I N L E T P R O T E C T I O N D E V I C E CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING1.INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE OR BIO-ROLL AROUND SITE2.DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES IF ANY.3.CLEAR AND GRUB.4.CONSTRUCT NEW STRUCTURE5.WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THESITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVESILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.EROSION PREVENTIONTHE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANING FOR ANDIMPLEMENTING APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING,VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, ANDOTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION.ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON ASPOSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 14DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THESITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROMANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OR DIVERTS WATERAROUND THE SITE, MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 20 LINEAL FEETFROM THE PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGEINTO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION OF THE LAST 20 LINEALFEET MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTINGTO A SURFACE WATER.STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARYOR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 14DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER ANDCONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILYOR PERMANENTLY CEASED.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES THAT ARE BEINGUSED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (WITH PROPERLYDESIGNED ROCK DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES ETC.) DONOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. THESE AREAS MUST BE STABILIZEDWITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENTCONTAINMENT SYSTEM.PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY ORPERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTERCONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER.SEDIMENT CONTROLSEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROMENTERING SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTERSYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS.SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALLDOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LANDDISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN INPLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATEBMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIALFOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHEREFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, AND CANNOT BE PLACED INSURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCHAS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUITS AND DITCHESUNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER.VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITEMUST BE MINIMIZED BY A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. STREETSWEEPING MUST BE USED IF THE ROCK ENTRANCE IS NOTADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO THESTREET.TEMPORARY DE-WATERING- DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G.,PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE)RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBIDOR SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TOA TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THEPROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF THE WATER CANNOT BEDISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THESURFACE WATER, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATEBMP'S SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTTHE RECEIVING WATER, DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS.THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS AREADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR. THEDISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP,SAND BAGS, PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER ACCEPTED ENERGYDISSIPATION MEASURES. ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROLMEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINSSUSPENDED SOLIDS.FILTER BACKWASH WATERS MUST BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL,RETURNED TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, ORINCORPORATE INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSEEROSION. DISCHARGE OF THE BACKWASH WATER TO SANITARYSEWER IS ALLOWED WITH PERMISSION OF THE SANITARY SEWERAUTHORITYSOIL COMPACTION PRECAUTIONSTHE PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND, UNLESSINFEASIBLE, PRESERVE TOPSOIL. MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION ISNOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF THE SPECIFIC AREA OFTHE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED. METHODS FORMINIMIZING COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKEDEQUIPMENT, AND STAYING OFF OF AREAS TO BE LEFTUN-COMPACTED. METHODS TO PRESERVE TOPSOIL INCLUDESTRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL PRIOR TO GRADING OREXCAVATION OPERATIONS INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCETHE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AT ALL TIMES FOR THEMAINTENANCE AND PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL FACILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT A MINIMUM,INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALLEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOILSTABILIZATION MEASURES.BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY AND SHALLMODIFY THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN IN ORDER TOPREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATERRUNOFF.POLLUTION PREVENTIONCONCRETE WASHOUT - SHALL OCCUR OFF-SITEHAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE AND HANDLING - OIL, GASOLINE, PAINTAND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED,INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKSOR OTHER DISCHARGE. RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREASMUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. STORAGE ANDDISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITHMPCA REGULATIONS.STORMWATERFINAL GRADING OF THE LOT SHALL PROMOTE SHEET DRAINING ANDAVOID CONCENTRATION OF STORM WATER FLOWS.FINAL GRADING SHALL MAINTAIN THE EXISTING STORM WATERDRAINAGE PATTERNS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE AND PRACTICAL ASTO NOT CAUSE ANY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES S T A B I L I Z E D C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E D E N O T E S T R E E P R O T E C T I O N D E V I C E G O P H E R S T A T E O N E C A L L W W W . G O P H E R S T A T E O N E C A L L . O R G ( 8 0 0 ) 2 5 2 - 1 1 6 6 T O L L F R E E ( 6 5 1 ) 4 5 4 - 0 0 0 2 L O C A L STORMWA T E R , S E D I M E N T & E R O S I O N C O N T R O L C O N T A C T : ROB ELDRID G E RIDGE CREE K C U S T O M H O M E S PHONE: 612-4 6 2 - 6 7 1 4 NOTES:SEE SURVEY, B Y A C R E L A N D S U R V E Y I N G , D A T E D X / X / X X X F O R P R O P O S E D H O M E E L E V A T I O N S & GRADESEXISTING DR A I N A G E P A T T E R N S D R A I N I N G O F F S I T E S H A L L N O T B E A L T E R E D . PROPOSED I M P E R V I O U S A R E A I S M O R E T H A N E X I S T I N G . T H E P R O P O S E D F I L T R A T I O N B A S I N S A R E DESIGNED T O C O N T R O L R U N O F F R A T E S F O R T H E 1 0 0 - Y R A T L A S 1 4 7 . 5 " S T O R M E V E N T T O A T O R BELOW EXIST I N G C O N D I T I O N S . ROOF DRAIN A G E S H A L L B E D I R E C T E D P E R T H E S T O R M W A T E R R E P O R T . NO ADDITION A L I M P E R V I O U S O R A L T E R A T I O N S O F D R A I N A G E P A T T E R S S H A L L B E A L L O W E D W I T H O U T A REVISION O F T H I S P L A N A N D A P P R O V A L B Y T H E C I T Y . SEE STORM W A T E R R E P O R T P R E P A R E D B Y C I V I L S I T E G R O U P D A T E D 1 1 / 4 / 1 5 IMPERVIOU S C A L C U L A T I O N S : EXISTING IMP E R V I O U S S U R F A C E = 4 3 8 2 S F PROPOSED I M P E R V I O U S S U R F A C E = 7 , 8 0 0 S F R E V I S I O N S U M M A R Y D A T E D E S C R I P T I O N C 1 . 0 S T O R M W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T A N D E R O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N . . . . . . . . . . . . W, Deputy Mary V. Chant, County Auditor SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota 20 Purouont to MN. STAT. Sac. 313313.565 (1969), thlo plat has been opproved this day of County Surveyor 46,ACRE LAND SURVEYINGT Servhg Win albs Metro i„1- area end beyond By ELDRIDGE 8TH ADDITION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, That A.INA.R.E Componice. U_C. o Minnesota limited 11001810 company. the owner of the following described property, eituated In the County of Hennepin. Stole of Minnesota, te—witi Lots 14 and 15. Bieck 3. VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS. Hennepin County. Minnesota. Torrents Certificate No. 1367601 Hee coused the vim., to be surveyed and platted am ELDRIDGE 6TH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public use forever the drainage Rod utility easements au shown an thIe plot. A witness whereof sold AWARE Companies, 0 Minnesote limited liability company, has coused these presents to be signed by its property officeer this day of The northeaet line of Lot 14.TVALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS. Io assumed to hove 0 bearing of North 47 degrees 29 rninutos 51 seconds West. REGISTRAR OF RILES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plot of ELDRIDGE 8TH 00011105 was filed in this office this cloy of ot o'clock Martin McCormick, Registrar of MI., By Deputy R.T. DOC. NO. NORTH °15iSk.g ( IN eNrr I A.K.A.R.E. COMPANIES. LLC: Robert N. Eldridge, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF Minnesota limited liability company, on belle 20 by Robert N. Eldridge. as Chief Manager of A.K.A.R.E. Componthe. U_C, • Den tea monument found 1/2 Inch Iron pipe, uniese o otherviso thorn. Dnftinricte71:1S7chNt.'ili:Sgh "'""n'n"*t DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: Notary Public County. Minnesota My Commission expires I. Joshua P. Schneider do hereby certify that this ptht was prepared by me or under my direct supervision: that I tem at tlui,ylicensed Land SurAryor tho State of Minnesota; that this plat le a correct representation of the boundary survey: Thot oll tnematic,a,,,,tt,t0:ncl theela aro correctly designated on NA plat: that oil monuments depleted on this plat have been, or 011 be ncerrec se that oll tooter boundarieo oinci wet lando, op donned In Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01. Subd. oo o t e dote 1of this certIllcotral• ehown and labeled on this plat, and ail public ways ere shown and labeled on this plot. Dated !hie day of 20 Joehtia P. Schneider, Usenet. Lend Surveyor Minnesota Lthenue Soother 44655 STA. OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This Instrument was acknowledged befere nth Ns day of 20 by Joshua P. Schneider. Notary Public County. MInneoeto Ay Commtheion expires CITY COUNCIL. City Of Edina. Minnevato thls plot of ELDRIDGE 0114 ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of EdIno. Minnesota at o regular mooting thereof hold title _000 0l 20_, If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of TronoportatIon and the County Highway Engineer hove been received by the City or the proscribed 30 day ponied hoe elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommentlotions, es provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section, 505.03, Sub. 2. City Council, City of Ed., Minneoota By Mayor By RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County. MInnetiota I hereby certify that taxes payable In 20_ ond prior yews hove been paid for the land described on thls plat. dated thle day of 20 . NO SCALE I BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT—OF—WAY LINES AND SER. 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT LINES. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. L 20 Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: VII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2015-115: Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Adopt resolution INT RODUCT ION: I n order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four f avorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gif ts and the departments receiving donations f or your consideration. AT TACHMENT S: Description Resolution No. 2015-115 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-115 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation: Edina Art Center: Kay Gritton $10.00 Eileen Conner Six Painting Books Tim Dirr Clay & Bisque Ware Marjorie Erickson Seashells & Art Reference Book Donald & Pat Sullivan 15 Sumi-e Art Books Carolyn Blake Oil Pastels, WC Crayons & Calligraphy Pater Edina Police Department: Tuan & Tiffany Bui 55.00 Dated: November 17, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Heather Branigin, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence I nf ormation CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: No action is necessary. INT RODUCT ION: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. AT TACHMENT S: Description Correspondence One 11.17.2015 Correspondence Two 11.17.2015 Correspondence Three 11.17.2015 Heather Branigin From: Tina Nelson <tinalnelson@hotmail.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 10:42 PM To: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton Subject: Edina Housing/Building complaint- urgent request for response Importance: High Hello Mr. Hovland and City Council members- I am writing you regarding ongoing mold and alarming building issues I have experienced in my home for 23 months with no resolution. The MN Attorney General's Office has provided me your email addresses and instructed me to file a complaint with you since the Edina Health Department and Edina Building Inspection Department previously have refused to enforce codes and initiate violations, after several requests and home visits. I contacted both departments dating back to early 2014 and neither department has taken my housing complaints seriously, as they continue to worsen. Because there are various holes in the roof/siding, water continues to enter my home every time it rains or snows- creating pervasive mold growth in my home. The Edina Health Department has personally witnessed the moldy bathroom on several occasions, stating mold is acceptable. They have also stated ongoing rodent infestations are acceptable and dripping water from the ceiling is acceptable. Unless I am misinterpreting the city codes, all of these items would be health/housing violations that would require correction. I don't think it is normal to have to lay plastic, tarps, and buckets in my home because the ceiling is leaking- I have photos and videos to prove it. The only person that can make corrections is the property management company (FirstService Residential) and they have refused to make successful building repairs to prevent these unacceptable conditions from continuing inside my home. Emergency repairs were requested Nov 2014 and again in Sept 2015, and they will not respond or complete the repairs. The MN Attorney General has provided me copies of the MN Statutes and has stated "enforcing city ordinances and codes is one of the duties of a code enforcement office, who are ultimately responsible to the mayor and city council". Because the FirstService Residential will not make repairs to the building to stop the water damage and related housing issues, I am requesting your assistance with enforcing the health codes and initiating violations. I don't know what else to do at this point after living in these unacceptable living conditions for 23 months already. With the winter months coming up, this is when the most severe damage and issues occur- I expect another rodent infestation in January 2016, similar to what I experienced in 2014 and 2015- the City of Edina Health Inspector witnessed both of these, while Bill's Wildlife and Plunkett's were in my home. In addition, I am requesting your help with enforcing the local and state building codes. The Edina Building Inspection Department is also aware of my housing situation, but has refused to enter the attic or go on the roof to confirm any of the building violations I have indicated. However, they have stated my home and living situation is acceptable. I don't know how it is possible to make such a statement when there was no inspection proving or disproving anything- this is very concerning. In addition, there has been improper mechanical venting installation on the roof by unlicensed contractors and no building permit was obtained- 1 this work that was done has caused various leaks and issues, and there is no documentation or city inspection, because of no permit requested by FirstService Residential. I had previously requested an explanation for this and there was no response. I have endured multiple inspections (by engineers) of the attic/roof, stating several building codes and fire codes have been violated and the building deterioration continues to worsen with the ongoing moisture intrusion. I find it disappointing that the city has looked away even though they have an obligation to enforce state and local codes, protecting Edina residents. I am giving you one final opportunity to do the right thing according to Minnesota Statutes and your obligation as the leader of this city. This horrible nightmare (that has destroyed my home) has dragged on long enough and I believe I have the right to live in a safe and dry home in Edina. Should you have any questions, please contact me. I am requesting a response within 24 hours, followed by a repair resolution identified and scheduled by Monday November 9, 2015. I look forward to your response and thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Tina Nelson 7602 York Ave #7313 Edina, MN 55435 2 Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dugan, Peter @ Minneapolis <Peter.Dugan@cbre.com > Thursday, November 05, 2015 5:14 PM Scott H. Neal; Cary Teague James Hovland; Carr, Danielle @ Minneapolis Good to see you and thank you Scott — It was good to see you again last night. It looks like running one of America's premier cities is agreeing with you. Thanks to you and Cary for all you do for the City and its citizens. Kind regards. Peter J, Dugan CBRE I Retail Brokerage Services 4400 West 78th Street, Suite 200 I Minneapolis, MN 55435 T +1 952 924 4806 I F +1 952 831 8023 I C +1 612 859 7650 peter.dugancbre.com I wvvw.cbre.com/peter.ducian www.cbre.com/retail24-7 Follow CBRE: Facebook I Acbre I Google+ Please consider the environment before printing this email. This message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or believe that you have received this correspondence in error, please contact the sender through the information provided above and permanently delete this message. 1 Heather Branigin From: Jim Platt <jplatt@petsareinn.com > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 10:33 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: to Mayor Jim Hovland Mr. Mayor, It was great seeing you last night at the Public Works Facility for the Update on the Renovation of the New 18 Hole Golf Course! As you know I have been a firm supporter to the changes being made to the Braemar Complex to include Building a New Golf Dome, the New Driving Range, Par 3 Course and of course the renovation/replacement of the Original 18 Hole Golf Course. Many things Joe Aboode has put in place have had people "kicking & screaming" but let's face it ... we need to move into "Today's" Golf Course Management .. and by and large I have been a supporter of Joe's efforts! However, it has come to my attention that Joe has taken it up upon himself to "CHANGE" the Braemar Logo. This is totally outside his Job Description as GM of Braemar Golf Course. There is a rich history at Braemar the past 51 years and to even think of changing a logo without anyone's input is modestly speaking ... Stepping Out-Of-Bounds. Should there be a change .. maybe .. probably with the introduction of a complete "NEW" comprehensive Golf Course Facility i.e. Dome Driving Range Par 3 Course New 18 Hole Course However to do this without input from interested and vested parties ... is a bit "stepping over the line"! Jim Platt 36 Year Edina Resident 25 Year Men's Club Member/Golf Course Supporter 1 Heather Branigin From: Pete <misc509@hotmail.com > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 10:38 AM To: James Hovland Cc: misc5096@hotmail.com Subject: RE: 509 Blake Road Issue Email 3of 3 Hi Jim, Thank you for your support The City Manager and the Maintained Manger come out to view the issues They said that the gas manhole cover is not the city issue but Minnegasco's issue, I offered to call Minnegasco they said they would handle it. The manhole issue they said it was to fine of an adjustment and that compared to most of the manhole covers on Blake Rd and Interlocken it was it great shape The driveway lip issue — we came to agreement that I would dig it out and they city would pave it in the spring The missing manhole with the electric wires in it — they both seemed to have no idea of why it was marked and why it was not fixed — they will take care of it Thank you for your support Why with Blake Rd in such bad shape is city waiting for 2020 to fix it. It is one of the gateways to Edina Pete Simpson From: Pete [mailto:misc509Photmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2015 6:00 PM To: ihovland@EdinaMN.gov Cc: 'Peter Simpson' <misc509@hotmail.com > Subject: RE: 509 Blake Road Issue Email 3of 3 Hi Jim, Enclosed is a memo and pictures that explain the issues on 509 Blake Road South This will take 3 mails because the size of the pictures and your email has a sized limit for enclosures. Regards Peter Simpson 952-93-4422 1 Heather Branigin From: Joshua M. Ahlberg <josh.ahlberg@gmail.com > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 3:56 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Fwd: Immediate Valley View Rd Sidewalk Need Good Afternoon, Mayor Hovland. I wanted to ensure you were included on this email correspondence, as I do feel as though it is a dire need in the community. Please feel free to reach out to me directly if you have any questions or concerns, but Pm hopeful that you will be supportive of this initiative. Thank you, Joshua M. Ahlberg 6825 Valley View Rd. 612.916.2482 Forwarded message From: Joshua M. Ahlberg <josh.ahlberg@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:27 PM Subject: Immediate Valley View Rd Sidewalk Need To: Mary Brindle <mbrindle@comcast.net>, <kstaunton@edinamn.gov>, <rstewart@edinamn.gov>, <swensonannl@gmail.com>, Edina Minnesota <mail@edinamn.gov> Cc: Mark Nolan <MNolan@edinamn.gov> Good Afternoon Council Members: My name is Joshua M. Ahlberg, and I live at 6825 Valley View Rd. The reason for my email today is to further elevate the need for a sidewalk on Valley View Rd. between Braemar Blvd. and Gleason Rd. The is an extension of a conversation started about a year ago between Mark Nolan, Mary Brindle and myself, and I wanted to widen the audience as I do feel as though the need is dire. Last September I attended a community meeting where residents were asked to speak out about the need (or lack thereof) for sidewalks in their community. At that meeting I was able to voice my opinion, but we also collectively discussed the criterion by which sidewalks needs were assessed and prioritized. During this meeting, and in several correspondences since, there have been admissions that the need on W between Braemar Blvd and Gleason are great, but due to budget limitations, the work had not yet been scheduled. For everyone's edification on this email, I will state them again as I do feel as though immediate action is needed for the safety of the citizens in my neighborhood. 1 • The stretch of roadway is an Active School Route: • Valley View Rd is used heavily by school age children walking to and from school. For students within walking distance of the school (which I believe was .7 miles), they have no choice but to walk to class. The south/western/south western portion of this radius clearly identifies a dangerous walk for these students. There is currently -- despite the addition of fog lines -- no room for students to walk to school down this stretch of roadway, nor is there proper lighting when doing so in low-visibility situations (i.e. - when the sun sets at 4:15pm and school children are walking home in winter). See the crude map below showing the bottleneck Valley View serves for school-aged pedestrian traffic. See the attached map (apologies for it's crude nature), which shows the area I am referring to -- outlined in green. Existing routes off of the top of my head are highlighted in red. You can see students walking from this area have no real choice but to either risk the danger of walking Valley View Rd., or take a longer route to school to walk safely due to the lack of sidewalk on Valley View Rd. This detour (into Indian Hills, or down Mark Terrace to Loch Moor and up Gleason) leaves them walking a great distance just to attend school. • These images show the new foglines, and how they are largely unusable at present. The pedestrian side is covered by overgrown brush, and season debris at present. Under this debris, however is an aged road that has its issues in and of itself. I am certain that this area will be covered by 2 snow in the winter months as well, making the lanes unusable and not functional addition to help keep pedestrians safe. In addition, state law requires that motorists give cyclists 3 feet of distance when passing. At present, there is not 3 feet to give where both cyclists and pedestrians have adequate room -- thereby creating a dangerous situation. 3 Very High Traffic Count: 0 Traffic counts exceeding 500 cars per hour are considered priority. Valley View Rd., according to readouts I was shown on the boards was 400-500% that number. 0 I believe the lack of sidewalks is also creating some of the traffic problem on VV. Parents feeling pressured to pick up and drop off their children use Valley View as a route to get to and from their schools. While I do not have any empirical evidence to support this argument, I do feel as though adding a sidewalk on Valley View Rd. would ease the minds of some parents, which would in turn increase their children's ability to walk to and from school. It was mentioned several times in the live session I attended that it is a strategic priority of the city to ease automobile traffic. I believe adding in a sidewalk on Valley View Rd. ladders up to that strategic initiative and would help -- all while satisfying the basic pedestrian needs of your constituency. Higher than Usual Average Traffic Speed: 4 O When more than 85% of the traffic exceeds the speed limit, this also merits priority. The average speed on Valley View Rd. is 33 MPH+ (30 MPH limit). Valley View Rd. will be a broken link: O With the new sidewalks having been installed on the south end of Valley View Rd ( which look great, by the way), the area in need serves as a broken link and therefore important to the city to complete. Valley View Rd. serves as a through road. O During heavy congestion times -- rush hours, construction times in the summer, and when children are heading to and from school -- traffic backs up significantly and adds to the danger to pedestrians. This fact is exacerbated by cars parking on the odd side of the street, squeezing pedestrian traffic into the woods to avoid danger. Most of these motorists are not from the area, or are commercial contractors, and care little for the well being of the local citizens. As a residents with a very small child and pets, my wife and I do not feel as though we can really access any of the nearby community resources due to the perilous walk. And it's not just us... Other parents don't feel safe either. We didn't have a single trick or treater this year -- just like last. Folks just do not feel as though it's a safe area for pedestrian traffic -- particularly at night. Adding a sidewalk and lights (or a light at least) would be very helpful. I think we can all agree that this is a need, and I ask that we do something about this need proactively before someone is injured by a motorist. I understand funding is largely the issue, as it is in most projects, so perhaps there is a way to address some of the need instead of the entire stretch of roadway. If we cannot tolerate the expenses of the project all at once, can we at least earmark funds immediately to build a sidewalk from Mark Terrace to Gleason in spring to get the project partially underway while we wait for larger funding resources to back the remainder of the project? I fear that is we don't act now, someone will be hurt due to a lack of action. Thank you for your time, and feel free to contact me directly with questions or concerns. Joshua M. Ahlberg 6825 Valley View Rd. 612.916.2482 5 Heather Branigin From: Constance E Soteropulos <csoterop@me.com > Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 4:16 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Fwd: Proposal to divert traffic from Sunnyside Road to W. 44th Subject: Proposal to divert traffic from Sunnyside Road to W. 44th To Chad Milner, Engineering Director, City of Edina: I am writing to share my opinion on the proposal to divert traffic to W 44th Street. I do not support it. I live on 44th Street and I am not thrilled at the idea that the Sunnyside traffic may be rerouted to my street. We have already seen an increase in traffic since our road was widened. And more increased traffic will be a hazard to our residents, kids and pets. As it is now, I even have a difficult time exiting my driveway! And I do know the increased traffic volume on my street decreases the value of my home. We've been down this path before with the Country Club residents wanting traffic diverted and soundly won that battle. I believe you will find we are ready to do the same again. Please reconsider this. And at the very least, provide us with information that substantiates the proposal and opportunities to be heard. It does not seem fair to punish the residents on 44th Street in favor of the residents on Sunnyside. Sincerely, Connie Soteropulos 4155 W 44th Street. 1 505 Nicollet Mall P.O. Bo 59038 Minneapolis, MN 55459-0038 w Energy November 9, 2015 To whom it may concern: I am writing to inform you that Administrative Law Judge Eric L. Lipman is holding five public hearings on CenterPoint Energy's rate increase proposal. For more on the public hearings, please see the enclosed copy of our Notice of Public Hearings for CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Customers. Please contact me if you have any questions or would like additional information about the filing. Additional information about our Rate Case is available at our website at CenterPointEnergy.com/RateCase. Sincerely, Christe Singleton District Director 612-214-6883 Enc. Notice of Public Hearings for CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Customers RATE INCREASE NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNESOTA CUSTOMERS CenterPoint Energy has asked the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) to increase its rates for natural gas distribution service. The requested increase is for $54.1 million, or about 6.4 percent per year. The requested increase would add about $5.15 to a typical residential customer's monthly bill. CenterPoint Energy requested the rate changes described in this notice. The MPUC may either grant or deny the requested changes, in whole or in part, and may grant a lesser or greater increase than that requested for any class or classes of service. The MPUC will likely make its decision on our rate request in the summer of 2016. If final rates are lower than interim rates, we will refund customers the difference with interest. If final rates are higher than interim rates, we will not charge customers the difference. PUBLIC HEARINGS Administrative Law Judge Eric L. Lipman is holding five public hearings on the company's proposal. Any CenterPoint Energy customer or other person may attend or provide comments at the hearings. You are invited to comment on the adequacy and quality of CenterPoint Energy's service, the level of rates or other related matters. You do not need to be represented by an attorney to provide comments during the public hearings. Tuesday Dec. 1 1:00 p.m. Civic Center, Mankato Room 1 Civic Center Plaza, Mankato, MN 56001 Tuesday Dec. 1 7:00 p.m. Normandale Community College Kopp Student Center—Room K1450 9700 France Ave. S., Bloomington, MN 55431 Wednesday Dec. 2 1:00 p.m. Earle Brown Conference Center Morgan Room — Lower Level 6155 Earle Brown Dr., Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Wednesday Dec. 2 6:00 p.m. Sabathani Community Center, 3rd floor, Room J 310 E. 38th St., Minneapolis, MN 55409 Thursday Dec. 3 7:00 p.m. Central Lakes Community College, Room E203 501 W. College Dr., Brainerd, MN 56401 CenterPoint® Energy Bad weather? Find out if a meeting is canceled — call (toll-free) 1-855-731-6208 or 651-201-2213 or visit mn.gov/puc Continued ... SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS Comment Period Comments accepted through Jan. 22, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. Comments must be received by 4:30pm on the close date Comments received after comment period closes may not be considered Online Visit mn.gov/puc, select Speak Up!, find this Docket (15-424), and add your comments to the discussion. If you wish to include an exhibit or other attach- ment, please send your comments via U.S. Mail. U.S. MO Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East, Ste. 350, St. Paul, MN 55101 Written comments are most effective when the following items are included: 1. The Docket Numbers in the subject line or heading O MPUC Docket Number G-008/GR-15-424 O OAH Docket Number 1-8-2500-32829 2. Your name and connection to the Docket 3. The specific issues that concern you 4. Any knowledge you have about the issues 5. Your specific recommendation 6. The reason for your recommendation. Important: Comments will be made available to the public on the MPUC's website, except in limited circumstances consistent with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. The MPUC does not edit or delete personally identifying information from submissions. The chart below shows the effect of both the interim and proposed rate changes on monthly bills for residential, commercial and industrial customers with average natural gas use: Customer Type /usage Avg monthly Avg monthly in therms) usage in therms bill: current Avg monthly bill: interim Avg monthly bill: proposed Residential 76 $56 $59 $61 Commercial/Industrial - up to 1,500/year 64 $52 $55 $61 - 1,500 to 5,000/year 247 $161 $170 $172 -5,000 or more/year 1,254 $756 $799 $756 Small Volume Dual Fuel Sales Service - up to 120,000/year 3,707 $1,810 $1,912 $1,813 -120,000 or more/year 12,675 $6,006 $6,345 $6,019 Large Volume Dual Fuel Sales Service 42,761 $17,570 $18,563 $17,725 *Figures above are rounded (to the nearest whole number) EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS Formal evidentiary hearings on CenterPoint Energy's proposal start on Jan, 19, 2016, at the MPUC's offices at 121 7th Place East, St. Paul. The purpose of the evidentiary hearings is to allow CenterPoint Energy, the Minnesota Department of Commerce — Division of Energy Resources, the Minnesota Office of Attorney General — Resi- dential Utilities and Antitrust Division and others to present testimony and to cross-examine each other's witnesses on the proposed rate increase. If you wish to formally intervene in this case, as a party to the litigation, please contact Administrative Law Judge Eric L. Lipman, P.O. Box 64620, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55164-0620. HOW TO LEARN MORE CenterPoint Energy's current and proposed rate schedules are available at: CenterPoint Energy 505 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis MN 55402 Phone 612-372-4727 or 1-800-245-2377 Web http://www.CenterPointEnergy.com/RateCase Minnesota Department of Commerce 857th Place East, Suite 500, St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone: 651-539-1534 Web: https://www.edockets.state.mn.us/EFiling/search.jsp Select 15 in the year field, type 424 in the number field, select Search, and the list of documents will appear on the next page. Questions about the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission's review process? Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East, Suite 350, St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone: 651-296-0406 or 1-800-657-3782 Email: consumer.puc@state.mn.us Citizens with hearing or speech disabilities may call through their preferred Telecommunications Relay Service. Heather Branigin From: Tina Nelson <tinalnelson@hotmail.com > Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 9:09 PM To: Jeff Brown Cc: David Fisher; Scott H. Neal; Lisa Schaefer; David Nelson; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; swensonannl@gmail.com; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton Subject: Re: Property Maintenance Complaint Thank you for your response. Unfortunately, your last visit was a joke and failed to include any type of visual inspection inside the attic or on the roof, so it baffles me that you can make statements in a report that everything is fine when nothing was even witnessed- except the black mold that you apparently don't think is a problem. All of the items I reported since January 2014 continue to be a growing problem and there have been no repairs to date that have addressed these issues. As I stated before, various engineering reports have identified pervasive mold growth, fire code violations, and significant building deterioration as result of building code violations. Emergency repair requests were submitted end of Sept 2015 and no resolution. Also, a life safety complaint was submitted last week and no response. I was given specific instructions from the MN Attorney General's Office to contact the mayor and city council, since you failed to complete a formal housing inspection in addition to refusing to enforce the local codes. Assuming that you don't plan to take these complaints seriously like you didn't before, I will be forwarding this email to the MN Attorney General's Office that you don't plan to assist in this matter as expected. Lucky for me, she has provided me an escalation path within the state. Thank you for your prompt response in ignoring these matters again. From: Jeff Brown <ibrown@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 2:02 PM To: itinalnelson@hotmail.comi Cc: David Fisher; Scott H. Neal; Lisa Schaefer; David Nelson Subject: Property Maintenance Complaint Ms. Nelson, I am responding to your email regarding the condition of your condominium unit at 7602 York Avenue South, Unit 7313. An inspection was conducted in April of 2015 by Building, Fire, and Health Department personnel specifically to address your concerns. I have attached the letter that was issued to you following that inspection. If you have new property maintenance or safety concerns in addition to the issues already addressed in this letter, please contact me at 952-826-0466. Thank you, 1 Jeff Brown, RS, Community Health Administrator 952-826-0466 I Fax 952-826-0390 jbrownEdinaMN.qov www.EdinaMN.qov Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be Subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is . strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 2 Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 12:22 AM To: James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - What can the city of Edina learn form America's most digital cities? America's Most Digital Cities of 2015 (Infographic) The annual Digital Cities Survey offers telling insights into the state of technology in America's cities. See what's trending this year and learn about local CIOs' priorities. Sixty-three cities across the country emerged as technology leaders in the 2015 Digital Cities Survey, conducted by e.Republic's Center for Digital Government. Here are a few insights into their award-winning IT programs. Click on the infographic to view the high-resolution version, and for more details,check out our story and interactive map featuring profiles on all 63 winners across four population categories. The 2015 Digital Cities Survey results are in. Dozens of cities were selected by a judging panel at the Center for Digital Government as the most strategic, efficient and innovative guardians of public-sector tech in the nation. The top-ranked cities will receive an award on Nov. 5 at the annual National League of Cities conference in recognition of their achievements. The first place winners in four population categories are Philadelphia; Alexandria, Va.; Avondale, Ariz.; and Shawnee, Kan. Judges evaluated the survey submissions of each city by considering four elements: citizen engagement, policy, operations, and technology and data. Given this common set of criteria, it's natural that the winners should have some qualities in common, but an unanticipated pattern arose among the winners: The best digital cities have developed a mature infrastructure that affords city leaders a chance to experiment with forward-thinking technology projects that are molded in the image of the average citizen's lifestyle. http://tinyuri.com/pfSueez David Frenkel 1 Heather Branigin From: Cami Flanagan <cami_flanagan@comcast.net > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 11:30 AM To: swensonann1@gmail.com; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; James Hovland Subject: 44th Street Safety issues Hello, I'd like to ask for some additional safety measures on 44th Street. The crosswalk to Kojetin Park is still very dangerous to cross as there is a visibility issue with the hill rise. The stretch between Wooddale and Grimes has 40 children. Many cars are at a high speed due to the long length between stop signs at this point. I have seen the signs that are placed in the center of a crosswalk to the law and required stop for pedestrians. I am wondering if we could get a sign like that for this crosswalk. Secondly, the 4 way stop at 44th and Wooddale is a highly traveled section of roadway and also a bus stop for Edina, St Louis Park and other private schools. There are 15 children that live in immediate proximity to that corner, and one child has been hit there in the past. It is poorly lit and most drivers come to a rolling stop at best. I am wondering if we can get an additional safety study for this location. The cup and flag system that St Louis Park has employed might be an option. Better lighting. Perhaps some signage alerting drivers that it's a state law to stop all 4 ways when a bus is present, may some police presence occasionally to remind drivers to slow down. I am aware that the roadway projects for Morningside (Curve, Sunnyside, Grimes) has a goal of calming traffic on those stretches. My concern is that will divert traffic to an already busy stretch. In addition, I believe a new vehicle trip count should be done as well as a safety study. The numbers for Sunnyside were collected in 2012 when traffic diverted to it during 44th street construction. Different numbers may have an impact on what calming measures are implemented for that area. I met with Chad Milner yesterday in regards to that project and, while I don;t want to hamper any safety concerns for those residents, I also don't want to add any to our street. I also have some issue with narrowing those streets. It is already a challenge for the Edina bus drivers to squeeze past the many commercial vehicles that use these roads daily. Ensuring a large fire truck can clear the road is one thing, but putting it into practice is another. These bus drivers have a challenge on their hands daily. I don't think narrowing roads and intersections will help them in any way to get our kids to school on time. Thanks for your consideration. I have already put in a request for the same measures with the Traffic Safety Committee. Cami Flanagan Heather Branigin From: Barbara Polich <barbarapolich@aol.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 5:24 PM To: Mail@EdinaMN.gov. Subject: Pub on Valley View I received the following post from Common Sense for Edina. "Possible new brew pub at WooddaleNalley View strip mall The city council discussed changing liquor ordinance to allow brew pubs at last weeks city council meeting. I saw Ann Swenson meeting last week with a developer and the owner of the strip mall at Margo's with a brochure labeled 'restaurant for 4500 Valley View. At last week's council meeting council members Ann S. and Kevin S. said that 45th and Valley View would be good location for brew pub when they spoke in favor of the liquor ordinance change. They voted in favor of liquor ordinance change." I am strongly against this. We have sidewalks, bike paths and schools in this area and many people are out after dark, many of them children. It's difficult enough to see walkers and bikers without adding alcohol to the mix. We also have more than our share of noise coming from the stadium and the planes in this area, as well as vehicles traveling to and from the stadium or cutting over to 100. Please abandon this idea for the safety of our families. Barbara Polich 6113 St. Johns Avenue, Edina 1 Heather Branigin From: Barbara Polich <barbarapolich@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 9:32 PM To: Mail@EdinaMN.gov. Subject: Pub on Valley View I would like to add a few more comments to my email sent earlier regarding a possible pub on Valley View. Placing a pub between two parks, (Pamela Park and the Stadium) and next to the Malt Shop which draws a lot of foot/bike traffic invites tragedy. I am not against pubs, but this location does not seem appropriate. Following is a comment listed on the Common Sense for Edina Site which increases my concern: just down the street from Steel Toe in Saint Louis Park and I can tell you first hand that there are zoning laws for a reason. These tap rooms are a crime. Drinking in parking lots in nice nights. Food trucks lined up with loud music going. This should not even be considered in our neighborhoods. There Edina city council has lost their minds. 1 Heather Branigin From: Traci Mercado <tracimercado@yahoo.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 9:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Valley View/Wooddale Development City Council Members, I'm writing you to express my support for the addition of a small restaurant or brew pub at the strip mall on Valley View and Wooddale in Edina. We live a few blocks East of that area and would welcome such an establishment. I know there has been some discussion on Nextdoor.com referencing some opposition. I want to make sure you know that there are MANY people in our neighborhood who support this addition as well. We welcome the opportunity to have a restaurant/brewpub/meet-up place nearby within walking or biking distance from our home. Edina lacks neighborhood restaurants and I would love to see this go through. We were excited about the proposition of a pizza place as well. Just wanted to share some support for this effort. We are hoping for some family friendly restaurants to add to the mix of options near our neighborhoods. Obviously, it goes without saying that there should be strict rules put in place regarding no drinking outside the establishment etc. Thank you for your consideration, Traci Mercado 4609 Woodland Rd W Edina, MN 55424 Pear M/0(- Tlc,(1 k ct-rn -ro r 7 L(` 4-0 tmce-f- Fiorcv\ 6<fl 1-iti73c cl'er 4-4 ,3 re.,ffy EVIjoid OLA r cier50,:r/tot,\ O/I-C9 (00 1<- -t-o I/vo.t• fUrv i, t/Ickve, re-5 40(5 aAct k r i`cia Co 5 ;ver VKi p M 18 LVI\It1/41 1M INN E::1141:-05 I (4M LU4 5L - GaLna, 1?;O1 5'6tt`N-. Eav 1 RN SL i'llA, t,oL T6ti.AA--vati. L TT .i ci,{AL cvp --k----t\.6-- .1.90u-k- Cou 1-1, RN t Ail°tAr I V.-1-e_ Vt,443 -19ere_c.i,a,le upk ill ‘.v.1, 1 -,l'cal,1,13 hSt tv) Ct-ild's rtn, 1.st, cs-v\ &rt ot_ le e ect-- _,Lorv: i-tivt d6 -v.° aqC,C,k- po\Ao. on 4)401,/(1,A4-u---v4--at t suk_o__ 'S LS ,LAJI/IA-A -L---- (OA 1,k3 Wytedifavik-- aii46-eirle_vcla,{ I-4-1A-- LiotA) uvici/ i i-cstAtze46. -e,,cpe.s.--c4 -inak-I.IU 2-1-7 d, (ii-41 1---*A0{ do. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MAYOR & COUNCIL VIII. A. Debra Mangen City Clerk ☒ ☐ ☐ November 17, 2015 Correspondence No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. Heather Branigin From: Ann Swenson <swensonannl@gmail.com > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 2:21 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Valley View/Wooddale Development Thanks Traci, I will let the leasing agent know how you feel. Ann Sent from my iPad On Nov 12, 2015, at 8:47 AM, Edina Mail <mail@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoaEdinaMN.clov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Traci Mercado [mailto:tracimercadoyahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 9:57 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Valley View/Wooddale Development City Council Members, I'm writing you to express my support for the addition of a small restaurant or brew pub at the strip mall on Valley View and Wooddale in Edina. We live a few blocks East of that area and would welcome such an establishment. I know there has been some discussion on Nextdoor.com referencing some opposition. I want to make sure you know that there are MANY people in our neighborhood who support this addition as well. We welcome the opportunity to have a restaurant/brewpub/meet-up place nearby within walking or biking distance from our home. Edina lacks neighborhood restaurants and I would love to see this go through. We were excited about the proposition of a pizza place as well. Just wanted to share some support for this effort. We are hoping for some family friendly restaurants to add to the mix of options near our neighborhoods. Obviously, it goes without saying that there should be strict rules put in place regarding no drinking outside the establishment etc. Thank you for your consideration, Traci Mercado 4609 Woodland Rd W Edina, MN 55424 1 Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 12:19 PM To: James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; swensonannl@gmail.com; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle Cc: Scott H. Neal; Kay McAloney Subject: Common Sense for Edina - Safety of the Braemar Edina Dome There has been much speculation and rumors about the installation of the Braemar Edina Dome that occurred this week. Evidently there were mechanical and weather problems making it difficult to get the dome up. The dome is up but is evidently not open. Whatever the problems were or are I would expect the Edina Dome was installed per the manufacturers specifications and it will be properly inspected for safety before it is opened to the public. As I have mentioned in previous emails safety should be the number one priority for the city of Edina and scheduling issues should not be the priority for opening the dome before it is completely safe for use. I would hope an expert in dome installation or the manufacture of the dome would sign off that the dome installation was done correctly and the dome is safe for use. David Frenkel 1 Heather Branigin From: Jennifer Janovy qanovy@outlook.com > Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 11:55 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: James Hovland; ann swenson swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Bob Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Scott H. Neal Subject: Please pull Item IV. K. from Consent Agenda Dear City Council members: Item IV. K. on your November 17, 2015 is a request for purchase of engineering services for extending the bike lanes on Valley View Rd. under TH62 to W. 66th Street. This agenda item has not been presented to the ETC. As an advisory body established by ordinance, the ETC has the responsibility to "investigate matters within the scope of the particular board or commission or as specifically directed by the council" and "advise the council by communicating the viewpoint or advice of the board or commission." The specific role of the ETC includes advising "the city council on the operation of the local transportation system (all modes, users, and abilities)" and developing "strategies, plans and recommendations to implement the city's multi-modal transportation vision." When transportation-related projects that fall within the scope of the ETC's responsibilities go directly to the City Council for approval, the ETC is denied the opportunity to perform its advisory function. When a request for purchase of engineering services comes to you, it often includes a scope of work. It is that scope of work (and perhaps the project itself) and how it relates to adopted policies/plans and other work that should be reviewed. Taking a look at 2014 and 2015, there have been several transportation-related matters that have gone directly to the City Council for approval, bypassing the ETC. Each of these matters fall within the scope of the ETC's responsibilities as defined by ordinance and some were on the ETC work plan. For example: • Both the 2014 and 2015 ETC work plans include "Review transportation projects in the proposed Capital Improvement Program" as an ongoing responsibility. A list of proposed transportation-related projects in the proposed 2015-2019 CIP was presented to the ETC for review in July 2014. This list did not include several significant projects that were included in the CIP adopted by the City Council in December: • Tracy/Valley View/Valley Lane roundabout • All Pentagon Park-related street projects • Grandview Transportation Study Not called out for discussion were the changes from "Greater Southdale Area Transportation Study" (which was on ETC work plan) to "Greater Southdale Area Traffic Model" or the elimination of the proposed pedestrian bridge replacement over TH62 near Rosland Park. 1 • Both the 2014 and 2015 work plans included working with the School District to address traffic issues on Valley View Rd. between Antrim and Gleason. Earlier this year I learned that City staff had presented to School District staff a concept for roundabouts at Valley View/Antrim and Valley View/Chapel Lane. In July 2015, the Council agenda included a proposed joint agreement with the School District and scope of work for a traffic study of the High School area. Neither had been run past the ETC. • Other examples of transportation-related matters brought to you without first coming to the ETC include the traffic sign installation and maintenance policy, the concept for a "Grand Loop" in the Parks strategic plan, and certain transportation-related projects in the citywide work plan as shown in the budget book (such as "Southdale are design guidelines and full pedestrian plan completed by 7/1/16). The above is not a criticism, but information. It is not a criticism of Mark Nolan, who does an excellent job working with the ETC. Across all departments, a substantial amount of staff resources go into supporting the work of advisory Boards and Commissions. It should be a priority to ensure that Boards and Commissions are able to fulfill their functions and do so effectively. If matters related to a Board or Commission's work come to the City Council and they have not first been presented to the Board or Commission, then the Board or Commission has not been given the opportunity to fulfill its responsibilities. I don't know why some items come to the ETC before they go to the City Council, and why some items go to the City Council directly. The standards for making those decisions have not been shared. A simple standard could be: • If it relates to an item on the Board or Commission work plan or is within the scope of the Board or Commission's responsibilities, and • If it will be placed on the City Council agenda for City Council discussion and/or approval, then • The Board or Commission will be given a timely opportunity to review the item and provide its advice to the City Council. Please pull Item IV. K. from the consent agenda and table until the ETC has been given the opportunity to advise you on this matter. Thank you for your consideration. Jennifer Janovy 2 Heather Branigin From: Lopez, Patricia <Patricialopez@startribune.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 12:02 PM To: James Hovland Subject: municipal liquor store Mayor Hovland, I'm trying to reach you for an editorial I'm considering on municipal liquors stores and wanted to talk to you about the situation in Edina. Would you be available sometime today or tomorrow morning? Thank you. Patricia Lopez Editorial Writer Star Tribune Editorial Board o 612-673-7028 c 612-599-2654 plopez@startribune.com Star Tribune Building I 650 3rd Ave S, Suite #1300 I Minneapolis, MN I 55488 StarTribune 1 Heather Branigin From: Jennifer.Kelly@hklaw.com Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 1:42 PM Cc: eve.otoole@hklaw.com; george.kivork@lacity.org Subject: Sign On Letter Supporting America Fast Forward Transportation Bonds Attachments: Supporting America Fast Forward Transportation Bonds Resolution 2015.docx; MayorsAFFSupportLtr.docx Dear Mayors, Just a friendly reminder, the deadline to sign onto the America Fast Forward (AFF) is Thursday, November 19. Please respond to Jennifer Kelly at: Jennifer.Kelly@hklaw.com if you would like to be added. All mayors names and city will appear listed at the bottom of the letter to House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Levin. NOTE: This e-mail is from a law firm, Holland & Knight LLP ("H&K"), and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail from your computer and do not copy or disclose it to anyone else. If you are not an existing client of H&K, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to H&K in reply that you expect it to hold in confidence. If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert of H&K, you should maintain its contents in confidence in order to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege that may be available to protect confidentiality. 1 James Hovland From: James Grube <James.Grube@hennepin.us> Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2015 9:16 AM To: James Hovland Cc: Janis Callison; Chad Millner; Mark K. Nolan; Debra R Brisk Subject: RE: Xerxes Ave Sketches Attachments: DOC101115-10112015093827.pdf; DOC101115-10112015094120.pdf Mayor, Thank you for providing your perspective regarding the Xerxes Avenue bumpouts. As neighbors in Edina continue their engagement of the elected officials at both the city and county levels, I have been working with city staff in terms of interpreting what Mr. John Hamilton has offered as his vision of how the corridor could be treated. Attached are two aerial photo sets with colored lines depicting bumpout locations. On both, the existing burnpouts are denoted in black within the parking lanes along the corridor. In the first aerial photo set the green dashed lines depict the locations where Mr. Hamilton believes bumpouts could be installed at a relatively modest cost. I interpret his vision to include the removal of the existing bumpouts. The second aerial photo set builds on the Hamilton concept in the first aerial photo set but installs more bumpouts along both sides of Xerxes Avenue for the length of the corridor between Minnehaha Creek and the Crosstown Highway. These are denoted in blue, with the red lines depicting storm sewer work. The second set also includes a cost estimate for the work - $808,000. For the purpose of understanding the cost implication, the corridor is approximately one mile long. The estimated cost to reconstruct the corridor is $6,000,000. The second aerial photo has much more bumpout work because the intent of bumpouts is to keep drivers toward the middle of the road. Under the Hamilton concept, the number of bumpouts is modest and, in my opinion, will not keep the drivers toward the middle. When we work along corridors we try to put bumpouts at the beginning and end of each block so drivers know where they belong. If one accepts that premise, the second aerial photo set begins to make sense. Again, going to either aerial photo set, if a bumpout is placed at a corner, the pedestrian ramp gets replaced, and upgraded to current guidelines. If one of the intersection corners gets a pedestrian ramp upgrade we would be hard pressed to ignore the other corners where ramps exist (we could, but it wouldn't really seem right). So if we upgrade all pedestrian ramps in an intersection where a bumpout started the work, one would have to step back and look at how many intersections receive bumpouts, and thus pedestrian ramp upgrades, and how many do not. Again, the second aerial photo set contains the prevailing thought on bumpout treatment to fulfill the Hamilton concept for the corridor, and we see more corner bumpouts which in turn lead us to the position that since we are doing some, we should upgrade all the pedestrian ramps at all the corners of the entire corridor. I have presented these two aerial photo sets to staff from both Edina and Minneapolis, asking the two city staffs a few questions to get their real position: I. Do they wish to spend $808,000 to install bumpouts to fulfill the vision? 2. Would they support the $808,000 expenditure if only one party had to pay? 3. Would they support the $808,000 expenditure if the cost is split three ways? 4. Would they accept responsibility of the bumpout materials if installed? 5. Would they support the replacement of the existing delineators with the bollards on the two "test bumpouts"? Note, we will continue to maintain the bumpouts. The intent of the questions is to elicit from the cities an indication of what they believe the right approach should be regardless of who pays. While your staff responded rather quickly to my overture, I just this week received the Minneapolis response. Minneapolis reports receiving very little feedback and interprets that as support for what is existing. Minneapolis is not interested in maintaining the bumpouts regardless of whether it is the existing or the full vision. I suspect your staff may have been in contact with you since you emailed me, but to summarize their thoughts: If the county pays for the full vision - $808,000 — your staff would support the action. At the same time they question when to go to the full reconstruction instead of investing in bumpouts of any magnitude. If there is to be a cost 1 split, your staff has expressed reservation in contributing, and believes the bollards present themselves much be •cte - than the delineators if the existing bumpouts are to remain. At this point I intend to contact Mr. Hamilton and the two neighbors who had expressed interest in something more robust and appealing than the existing bumpouts and meet with them together with yourstaff. I will invite Minneapolis staff to participate So they remain engaged and offer their thoughts. If there is anything else I can do for you please let me know. Jim Grube, P.E. County Highway Engineer Hennepin County 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 Office: 612-596-0305 Cell: 612-250-2615 James.grube@hennepin.us From: James Hovland [mailto:jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com] Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:31 PM To: James Grube <James.Grube@hennepin.us> Cc: Janis Callison <Janis.Callison@hennepin.us>; Scott H. Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov>; 'Chad Millner' <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: FW: Xerxes Ave Sketches Jim, for emphasis, I had some people from another town ask me this morning( Bill Schrieber and his wife, Lona) about the "white sticks" on Xerxes. I, like,others, appreciate the county's efforts to try and improve safety on Xerxes north of the Crosstown but I would love to see the bumpouts expanded as Mr. Hamilton suggests to actually be landscaped bumpouts akin to what was done on Lyndale. Is this possibly something the City and the County could work on and fund together to maintain safety but enhance and beautify the street? IR James B. Hovland, Esquire HOVLAND & RASMUS, PLLC Southdale Office Centre 6800 France Avenue S., Suite 190 Edina, MN 55435 jhoyland@hoylandrasmus.com Phone: (612) 874-8550 Direct: (612) 874-8551 Fax: (612) 874-9362 Cell: (612) 961-6192 From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov] On Behalf Of James Hovland Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:22 PM Subject: FW: Xerxes Ave Sketches 2 , /1 0 — Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.qov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: John Hamilton [mailto:johnh61250gmail.corn] Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:07 PM To: James Grube Cc: James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Chris Bremer Subject: Re: Xerxes Ave Sketches Hello All; I have been trying to get some traction on Xerxes Ave. to see what is possible for the renovation. We had established a Task Force to study the street to see what improvements might be possible. • Back in July the task force agreed that the steel bollards previously researched by the group were an improvement to the plastic "wands" originally installed. Mr. Grube was able to install them on two of the islands and committed to revising the installation so that the bollards were shimmed to vertical. There has been no progress on that front. • We provided sketches of revised curb lines delivered to the County Engineering Department in early September and met with the Mayor on the street to review the concept. After several attempts to follow up, I have not heard from the County on their intent to pursue the ideas. Inertia is a powerful force; eventually any effort for change will wither. But the impact of the concrete islands on the residential nature of the street goes on, eroding property values and frustrating home owners. Edina is spending a great deal of time, effort, political energy, and money investing in the Living Streets Concepts. How can we allow Xerxes, a critical entry point to the community, to remain as it is? Please let me know what I can do to advance the changes we all recognize are needed. Regards, John Hamilton 612-889-7193 On Oct 26, 2015, at 4:34 PM, John Hamilton wrote: Hi Mr. Grube; It has been well over a month. Are we going to discuss Xerxes, or is it a dead issue for you? Thanks, John Hamilton 612-889-7193 On Sep 22, 2015, at 2:10 PM, James Grube wrote: Mr. Hamilton, 3 I had spoken with my staff earlier today and we believe we need a bit more time. I will try to set something up within the next couple weeks and let you know. Thanks Jim Grube, P.E. County Highway Engineer Hennepin County 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 Office: 612-596-0305 Cell: 612-250-2615 James.grube@hennepin.us Original Message From: John Hamilton [mailto:johnh6125@gmail.corn] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 2:00 PM To: James Grube <James.Grube@hennepin.us> Subject: Xerxes Ave Sketches Hello Mr. Grube; Just a follow up to see that you received the sketches I dropped off last week at your request. Please let me know your schedule to follow up. Many thanks, John Hamilton 612-889-7193 Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission en-or and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 4 Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you. are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2013.0.3532 / Virus Database: 4447/10922 - Release Date: 10/31/15 5 '1111•11=111.1.—o-Nsmee-r-mo Fja SCALE 11n 11111=== JILMIL1 I „ffILBEZ11. I. IIXINEE/31 DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD SHEET 131 a exl pain 18 la•pe . rerlmy W IJJ1/hkng.hPThMUltip4q. 87 SHEET DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD 07 ;yr 11”1/411h NU•nye.projNAJ11.1Norley 1411.sign.le-MItc0.6.69. SHEET DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD 13 3 pat. 10/1/.17 %Nury212214_11•n [1,,I., U .17AllasignNY1,1114.,0171)4g. B7 .ATri P 0 25' 50' SCALE M111•1=1=3 ' DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD J • "49^ 2-4P '9^ V 0 • 5i/ET 05 07 DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD IV MI5 lAtespo1,0n 11111.1b.erley J1 17. SHEET DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD 07 Imyo pa,V1/1 .0111J.eloy LY UolsgrikPlenN14 .der luataamiussismagsru lit_.,..,_... • •• DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD SHEET a 7 pyllaU 111/1/(11. LI Mr on ,1511“1, L 17 Xerxes Avenue (CSAH 31) Cost Estimate for Intergrated Bumpouts 10/6/2015 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ELEMENTS/COST ESTIMATE Check all that apply ITEM _ ' COST Specific Roadway Elements X Mobilization $35,000 X Removals $70,000 Roadway (grading, borrow, etc.) X Roadway (aggregates and paving) $120,000 Subgrade Correction (muck) X Storm Sewer $150,000 Ponds X Concrete Items (curb & gutter, sidewalks, median barriers) $200,000 X Traffic Control $20,000 X Striping $2,000 X Signing $1,000 Lighting X Turf - Erosion & Landscaping $20,000 Bridge Retaining Walls Noise Wall Traffic Signals Wetland Mitigation Other Natural and Cultural Resource Protection RR Crossing X Other Roadway Elements $55,000 X Contingencies ,Roadway $135,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST - PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE $808,000 0 25' 50' SCALE rejggi • - V DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD SHEET 141/1/4. N1 pi'ye J41114.0.1.eloy B7 z_BV SHEET DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD 13 2 B? P• 1..J • SHEET DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD 77- 0 7 SHEET B4 DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD B? MI 44. .anpalptaj.P1.111.0,1.LI IJIZIOnaspVler.Jilx#60, romilmosamovr= ,1101fAti. 4 Z 0' 25' 50' SCALE 111•11n 1== , „ Fr! ir 11 1 I '1 a 67114 osaL • —..V...014.t.tk.MIMMtarn SHEET DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE • LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD (3 7 Iv" 1 auwassrulami.itts.storgn DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD B7 DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE TO BE VERIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD SHEET :.„3,777V J James Hovland From: Ellen Jones 2 <ejsbusinessmail@mac.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:48 PM To: James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle; Bob Stewart Subject: Park Board Item Dear City Council: I am writing regarding November 17, City Council Agenda Item VII B., Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study. The Park Board discussed this topic at our November meeting last week, however the draft minutes of that meeting do not appear to be in your packets. This park board meeting was televised so you may prefer to watch the meeting instead of reading my following comments. Some citizens have already commented to me about the televised meeting as it pertains to Grandview. City Council has directed the parks staff to select a consulting team to assist with a Grandview facility operational feasibility study. I agree with Council and staff that this is the necessary next step in planning for the public portion of the Grandview site. My concern is about the consultant chosen for the arts portion of the feasibility study, Sutton & Associates. I do not think that Director Kattreh knew that George Sutton, who is the principle consultant in this proposal is also the Executive Director of the Sewell Ballet Company. I do know that some members on council are also aware that the Sewell Ballet Company has expressed an interest in relocating to Grandview should the City build an appropriate performance space. There should be a clear separation between a consultant reviewing the financial feasibility of a project and a potential lesee. The City needs to be able to rely on consultant analysis that is unbiased and from an independent source, without any apparent conflict of interest. The final proposal needs to be beyond reproach. By using Sutton & Associates the City of Edina is unnecessarily opening itself up to criticism of the arts portion of the report and financial feasibility. Using a different Arts consultant presents the opportunity to actually enhance the project. Sutton & Associates is primarily a performance arts consultant. We need a consultant with arts experience across the broad range of arts: visual, media, literary, and mixed, not only performance arts. Ideally, this consultant would have in-depth knowledge of this region and would also have exposure to the broader arts scene. A new consultant would bring fresh ideas and perhaps an arts vision worth exploring. As expressed in the Park Board proceedings, I recommend that the City hire a different arts consultant for the arts part of the project, or have HGM perform most of this work and send out a smaller section to a different arts consultant. Sincerely, Ellen Jones Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: B.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Administrative Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Planning Commission, October 14, 2015 Information CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Please find attached October 14, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. INT RODUCT ION: AT TACHMENT S: Description October 14, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS OCTOBER 14, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Hobbs, Lee, Strauss, Thorsen, Ma, Kivimaki, Nemerov, Olsen, Carr, and Platteter Absent from roll: Forrest III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Carr moved approval of the September 30, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Carr moved approval of September 9, 2015 meeting minutes. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None Commissioner Lee moved to close community comment. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; public comment period closed. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Site Plan with Variances. Bank of America. 6868 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation 2 Planner Teague presented his staff report, findings and conditions for Bank of America, 6868 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Teague concluded that staff recommends site plan approval with variances based on the following findings: • The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the setback and parking space variances. • The findings for a variance are met. The practical difficulty is cause by the unique triangular shape of the property with two street fronts on the two “long sides” of the site. • The variance is reasonable. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setback. However, the City Code Section 36-618. (3) states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The applicant is proposing a boulevard style sidewalk along France and 69th, and has provided sidewalk connection from that sidewalk to the building. The applicant could develop the site to meet the setback requirements. In granting to the requested variances, the overall site plan is improved and provides more green space. • The project would be more pedestrian oriented with the conditions recommended by the city engineer. Approval of the Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Grading plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Building elevations date stamped September 28 and October 1, 2015. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 3 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 4, 2013. 6. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. 7. Bike racks must be provided to meet minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 8. The Merrill Lynch Entrance on 69th Street shall be enhanced to resemble a storefront entry as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. This could be accomplished with an awning or signage at the entry. B. Recommend that the City Council approve the front setback variance from 35 feet to 20 feet for the ATM drive through, and a variance to allow an ATM drive through to be located on a side of a building that faces property zoned R-1, Single-dwelling unit district at 6868 France Avenue. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The variance criteria are met. The practical difficulty is cause by the unique triangular shape of the property with two street frontages on the two “long sides” of the site. To meet city code, the drive-through would have to be moved to behind the building toward France Avenue. In doing so, the circulation in the parking lot could be compromised. Additionally, moving the drive-through to the France Avenue side of the site could also compromise future development on the site. The area between the Tavern on France and the proposed bank could be a potential development site. Having a drive- through on France Avenue, similar to the existing drive-through on the site, would not promote a pedestrian friendly environment. 2. The drive-through location would simply replace an area that currently exists with parking. Cars are located there now. This area also sits lower than the street, and would be screened by evergreens that would grow to be five (5) feet tall. 3. The residential area to the west is heavily screened already by vegetation and fencing. Therefore, this drive-through would not be visible from existing homes. This area would be less visible from France Avenue than the existing drive-through on the site. 4. The drive-through would be adequately screened without compromising security. Approvals of the Variances are subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Grading plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 1, 2015. • Building elevations date stamped September 28 and October 1, 2015. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 4 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 4, 2013. Appearing for Applicant Anita Thomas and Aaron Greene, with Gensler Applicant Presentation Ms. Thomas addressed the Commission informing them the proposed building is a ground up LEED certified flagship Bank of America Financial Center located in Edina and is part of a larger Planned Office District development. Thomas acknowledged the unique aspects of being part of a larger office development that blends well with the existing components while being mindful of future development opportunities. Thomas said the intent is to demolish the existing bank and drive through and replace it with the new Bank of America and drive through. Thomas pointed out to the Commission the landscaping, new seating areas and the additional entrance requested by the Commission and Council. Mr. Greene with graphics illustrated the exterior materials, lighting features and landscaping. Continuing, Thomas said the proposed development will include the constructions of new sidewalks, parking spaces, a corresponding storm water management system, lighting and landscape/irrigation. Thomas said the storm water management system would include both surface retention ponds and an underground storm water storage system. She also noted the location of the proposed remote drive-up ATM. Concluding, Thomas asked the Commission for their support. Discussion Commissioners raised the following: 5 • It is important that the sidewalk is extended past the drive-through ATM around the perimeter of the site. • Ensure that parking areas are screened from the road and parking areas are screened internally. • Disappointment was expressed that the building wasn’t better reoriented along France Avenue; including relocation of the drive-through and that the plans presented were similar to the plans submitted at sketch plan. • Consider adding landscaping to the parking islands north of the proposed building. • Acknowledgment that the site itself is a difficult site with regard to building orientation and the drive-through location noting that the site is surrounded on three sides by a road. • Acknowledgement that the exterior building materials are high quality stone; not metal panels. • Consider redesigning the steel pole/column at the main entrance to the bank. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion A discussion ensued with the majority of the Commissioners expressing support for the project pointing out the difficulties faced with design options as it relates to the multiple street frontages and that the site is also part of a larger office park development and any development in this area impacts not only this corner but the entire site. Motion Commissioner Carr moved to recommend Site Plan Approval with variances subject to staff findings and staff conditions including the additional conditions: 9. The three existing islands in the parking lot north of the proposed building shall be landscaped including over-story trees. 6 10. Landscaping shall be added to the south side of the new parking lot that is to be west of the new building. This landscaping shall provide screening of the parking lot. 11. Boulevard trees must be included on the final landscape plan subject to review and approval of the city forester. 12. The sidewalk on the east side of Wooddale/69th Street shall be continued to the north within the limits of the proposed project. This sidewalk would eventually be continued to 66th Street upon further development on this site. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Carr. Nays; Olsen, Nemerov and Platteter. Motion carried. B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Taprooms, Brewpubs, Wineries and Distilleries Planner Teague delivered his presentation summarizing each section in the proposed Ordinance Amendment: • Section 1. Definitions. Each of the uses are defined. They include: Brewery, Brewpub, Distillery, Cocktail Room, Taproom, and Winery. These definitions are consistent with state law, with each of the cities surveyed, and are recommended by the city attorney. • Section 2. Parking Regulations – Parking regulations for each of the uses are defined. The ordinance proposed for taprooms requires one (1) space per forth (40) square feet. • Section 3. Brewpubs (Where would they be allowed). Brewpubs are proposed to be allowed in the City’s Commercial Zoning Districts (PCD-1, 2 and 3). They would be considered a permitted use just like a restaurant. Teague noted an example of a brewpub would be Granite City. • Section 4. Brewery, Distillery, Taproom, Winery, Cocktail Room (Where would they be allowed). A brewery distillery, cocktail room, taproom and winery would only be allowed in the PID, Planned Industrial District. • Section 5. Mobile Food Unit (Food Trucks). A licensed mobile food would is allowed as an accessory use to a taproom, winery, distillery or cocktail room. This helps address the issue of serving food at these establishments. A food truck is only allowed in the industrial district, if it is accessory to these uses. • Section 6. Provides the regulations for breweries, taprooms, wineries, distilleries, cocktail rooms and brewpubs. Teague further noted that existing code standards would be applied; restrictions, controls and design standard which because of the nature of their operation are accompanied by an excess of noise, vibration, dust, dirt, smoke, odor, noxious gases, glare or wastes shall not be permitted. These residual features shall be considered as “excessive” when they either exceed or deviate from the limitations set forth in the performance specifications for each issue. 7 Discussion Chair Platteter inquired if food trucks were allowed would they need to be licensed. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative, adding food trucks would be licensed by the City of Edina Health Division. Commissioner Carr commented that as she viewed the ordinance language she suggested that “mobility” be clarified with regard to the mobile food unit. She said she doesn’t want the “trucks” stored on site. Commissioner Nemerov agreed, adding language could be added that would read “during hours of operation” or something like that. Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Nemerov noted he was interested in the suggestion Commissioner Carr offered at the last Planning Commission meeting that there should be a distance for taprooms, etc. from a school. Continuing, Nemerov pointed out that in his opinion 36-113 dd “one space per 1,000 gross square feet of production floor area; Spaces” doesn’t flow right. Teague agreed and suggested adding the word “and”. Commissioners agreed “and” clarified the sentence; with regard to the distance from schools Teague said he would check into that; however believed that is part of the liquor ordinance. Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. Public Hearing No one spoke to the issue; Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioners stated they felt that this ordinance amendment would be good for the City; noting that there is interest in these types of facilities. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved to recommend amending the zoning ordinance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including addressing the mobility issue of food trucks in the industrial zoning district. Planner Teague said he would add a sentence in 36-1275 that addresses outdoor storage of food trucks. It was also suggested that the ordinance be amended to add the word “and” to 36-1311 dd. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packet materials. 8 VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Carr updated Commissioners on the progress of the Greater Southdale Area Working Group. Carr reported that the work group has divided the Greater Southdale Area into four quadrants and will break up into sub teams to study each quadrant. Commissioner Thorsen reported on the transportation element of the Grandview Area. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported the City Council approved the subdivision request for Crest Lane and continues to work on the Affordable Housing plan. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Thorsen moved adjournment at 9:00 pm. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. _______________________________________ Respectfully submitted Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: B.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Administrative Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Planning Commission, September 30, 2015 Information CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: INT RODUCT ION: AT TACHMENT S: Description September 30, 2015 Planning Commission Minutes 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Hobbs, Lee, Strauss, Thorsen, Ma, Kivimaki, Nemerov, Olsen, Carr, Forrest and Platteter III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of the September 30, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of September 9, 2015 meeting minutes. Commissioner Nemerov offered an amendment to the minutes. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Variance. Edina Pet Hospital LLC. 7701 Cahill Road, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague presented his staff report noting the following: Staff believes the proposal is justified for the following reasons: 2 1. The site contains mature trees and utility equipment including a telephone pole and cable that would prevent a code compliant sign to be located in the southwest corner of the site. 2. The building has little visibility for clients coming to the site from the east on 78th Street. 3. The building sits lower than 78th Street, which adds to the difficulty in visibility. 4. The two signs combined would be less than half of the square footage allowed for monument signs on this site. 5. The variance criteria are met. Planner Teague said the practical difficulty is the site’s location at 78th and Cahill, two very busy streets. There are mature trees, and utilities located along the south lot line that creates a practical difficulty in meeting the setback requirement. The building and site in general sits lower than the street; the building is screened by mature trees as traffic approaches the site from the east on 78th. Customers may miss the turn on Cahill, as there is no building identification along 78th Street. A much larger (80 square foot) Code compliant sign could be located at the southwest corner of the site; however, utilities would have to be moved, and mature trees would have to be taken out. Continuing, Teague said the unique circumstances are the location of the above mentioned utility equipment and the mature trees along south lot line. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variances for 7701 Cahill Road, based on the following findings: 1. The practical difficulty is cause by the location of utilities and mature trees along the south lot line that would prevent the applicant from building a larger sign to meet the City Code requirements. 2. The building and site in general sits lower than the street; the building is screened by mature trees as traffic approaches the site from the east on 78th. Customers may miss the turn on Cahill, as there is no building identification along 78th Street. 3. The two signs combined would be less than half of the square footage allowed for monument signs on this site. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: 3 • Site Plan dated stamped August 17, 2015. • Sign plans and elevations date stamped August 17, 2015. Appearing for the Applicant Jill Eversman, Edina Pet Hospital Discussion Commissioner Carr asked if snow removal could compromise sight lines for the new sign. Planner Teague responded that West 78th Street is a busy street and snow removal and maintaining sight lines is a priority, adding the sign should not be compromised because of its location on the property; off the right-of-way. Commissioner Forrest questioned the distance between the sign and the corner. Teague responded the distance is 40+ feet. Commissioner Strauss asked if there are any future plans to add a sidewalk on that side of West 78th Street that could impact the sign. Planner Teague responded that he is unsure of future sidewalk plans; however, the sign wouldn’t be compromised because the sign is located on the property; not the right-of-way. Commissioner Nemerov raised the question of practical difficulties with regard to the setback for the sign and suggested that if approved another finding (#4) be added that acknowledges another difficulty in meeting setback would require the removal of a large tree. Applicant Presentation Ms. Eversman addressed the Commission and explained she met with City staff and between them they determined the importance of the existing large tree and the City’s goal to retain as many of the large trees as possible. Ms. Eversman further explained that because the building sits lower visibility is especially difficult as traffic approaches the site from the east. Eversman said when it’s an emergency situation people sometimes drive right by. She stated the additional sign would aid in finding the hospital. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. 4 Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Thorsen further suggested that a finding is added to the practical difficulties indicating that preserving the large tree supports the need for a 10-foot sidestreet setback. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. Variance. John Colliander. 6012 Halifax Avenue, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker informed the Commission the applicant is requesting a 1.3-foot side yard setback variance to add an addition to the south side of the existing garage. Aaker reported the following Staff believes that the practical difficulty is that the home was originally built as a rambler and was subsequently remodeled with a 2nd floor added by a previous home owner and prior to the current (deeper), setback requirements. The current design proposal has been based on the previous code that would have allowed for a 5 foot setback on both sides if wall height doesn’t exceed 15 feet. The lot is pie shaped as is the neighbors, so structures move farther from one another as they go back in their respective properties reducing any impact on neighboring properties. Continuing, Aaker said the addition makes sense given the existing floor plan and location of the garage. The narrow garage cannot be improved upon without the benefit of a variance. The garage is currently substandard and is not a two car width garage as required by city code. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variance based on the following findings: 1. The property with an addition of the garage width, mudroom and pantry and the request to deviate from the side yard is a reasonable use of the property. 5 2The home is appropriate in size and scale with the addition of garage width allowing reasonable use of the under-sized two car garage. 3There is a practical difficulty in meeting the ordinance requirements due to the existing floor plan and desire to maintain the character of the home. 4There are circumstances unique to the property that necessitates a variance to make reasonable use of the property. The garage is currently under sized with the proposed additions minimal to create functional spaces. Aaker concluded that approval is subjects to the following conditions; the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Architectural site plans date stamped: August 28, 2015 • Building plans/ elevations date stamped: August 28, 2015. Appearing for the Applicant Jon Colliander, Applicant and Shawn Everts and Anne Reddy, Homeowners Discussion Commissioner Thorsen asked staff if the City has a standard two stall garage width. Planner Aaker responded that the City doesn’t have language that addresses minimum or maximum two stall garage width; however, she said 22’X22” or larger is what the City sees most often for a two stall. Commissioner Nemerov asked when the original house was built. Planner Aaker responded she is unsure of the exact date; however believes it predates the 1960’s. Commissioner Lee asked Planner Aaker if the existing home was compliant. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative, adding the reason a variance is needed now was because of the June 2015 ordinance change. Commissioner Carr asked if the City received any comments from neighbors. Planner Aaker responded no negative comments were received. Commissioner Hobbs asked Planner Aaker if the driveway was changing. Planner Aaker responded at this time she is unsure if the driveway would change. She explained that driveways do not require permits; however, a new curb cut would require a permit from the Engineering Department. Commissioner Forrest asked for clarification on the variance. Planner Aaker explained that this past June the zoning ordinance changed requiring a 60-foot wide lot to require a minimum setback of 12-feet total with no less than 5-feet on one side. Aaker pointed out the current setback on one side is 5-feet; therefore in order to be compliant with the new code the setback 6 on the opposite side would need to be 7-feet. The applicants are requesting a setback of 5.7- feet; not the required 7-fee; therefore a 1.3-foot side yard setback is required. Applicant Presentation Mr. Colliander explained that the new homeowners would like a larger garage door to provide adequate clearance. Colliander said the current garage door width is 15-feet and the homeowners desire a 16-foot wide door for better maneuverability. Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. Public Hearing No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Forrest commented if approved it is good to note that the side requiring the variance abuts the neighbor’s garage. Mr. Everts agreed. He added the next door neighbors support the request as proposed. Commissioner Nemerov said he wonders if this would pass the “bobcat” test. Planner Teague responded he is unsure of that; however required clearance is 3-feet. Commissioner Lee agreed that it is a valid point on how machines get onto the property without trespass. Commissioner Forrest asked if the stoop would be removed. Mr. Colliander responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Lee stated for the record that she is having difficulty justifying the variance. She said the previous addition took a rambler and made a two story home which took advantage of the existing floor plan/foundation; adding an interior element which is now an issue. Lee said in her opinion the end result is a significant change for the neighborhood that she can’t support. Commissioner Carr commented she agrees that the floor plan shouldn’t be an issue to support the variance; however, in her opinion the angled lot shape created the practical difficulty; supporting the need for a variance Motion Commissioner Carr moved variance approval based on staff findings and the additional finding that the angle of the lot presents a practical difficulty. Commissioner Forrest 7 moved to amend the findings to include impact is minimal due to the garage to garage layout between homes. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Strauss, Thorsen, Nemerov, Olsen, Carr, Forrest, Platteter. Nay, Lee. Motion carried. C. Variance. Andrew Vick. 5120 West 44th Street, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker told the Commission the setback variances are being requested to add onto a home located in the north east corner of West 44th Street and Brookside Terrace. The owner is requesting a variance to allow an addition to his home at nearly the same nonconforming front yard setback along West 44th Street as existing and an extension to the west side of the home that will provide a 15.7 foot setback from Brookside Terrace. Improvements will include a basement rec room, a main floor living room and a master bedroom with bath on the second level. A conforming mud room behind the home is also proposed. The owner is proposing a patio on the west side of the home to be located 6 feet to the westerly lot line/Brookside Terrace. The project is a major remodel and addition to an existing nonconforming single family home. The architect has indicated that less than 50% of the existing exterior wall area will be removed for the project. Aaker explained that all of the improvements will allow for a reasonable expansion of the property given the existing floor plan and deep setback requirements from both West 44th Street and Brookside Terrace. The property must maintain two front yard setbacks along both 44th Street and Brookside. The required setback from west 44th Street is established by the front yard setback of the home to the east located at 5116 West 44th Street. The home to the north fronts Brookside Terrace so the setback for the subject property is dictated by the front yard setback of the neighbor to the north. The home to the north facing Brookside and located at 4375 Brookside Terrace is farther back on their lot, (30.1 feet), than the minimum 15 side street setback standard required for a typical corner lot. Continuing, Aaker reported that the subject property is located on the north side of west 44th Street and east of Brookside Terrace consisting of a two story home with a detached two car garage built in 1920. The lot is 11,360 square feet in area. The owner is proposing additions and improvements to be setback from the front, (south), lot line approximately 48.7 feet, which is almost the same distance as the existing home at 48.9 feet. The west side wall of the new home addition will be at 15.7 feet from Brookside Terrace with a proposed patio to be within 6 feet of the westerly/Brookside Terrace lot line. The patio requires a setback variance from the west lot line of 24.1 feet. Aaker noted that the setback from Brookside Terrace is established by the front yard setback of the home to the north, which was built at a much later date, (1978), than the subject home built in 1920. If there were no adjacent homes fronting Brookside Terrace then the side street setback from Brookside Terrace for the subject home would be 15 feet and the addition would be conforming. However, the 8 patio as proposed would still not conform to a typical 15 foot side street. Continuing, Aaker noted that spacing between the home to the north and the side wall of the detached garage closest to the adjacent home will remain at over 60 feet. The back wall of the home will still be over 110 feet from the closest point of the home to the north. So spacing between improvements and the existing home to the north will remain generous. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variances with the exception of the patio setback from Brookside Terrace. The patio should be approved at a setback no closer to Brookside Terrace than the addition to the home. Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a) The practical difficult is caused by the location of the home to the north and the home to the west. b) The encroachment into the setback will maintain a typical side street setback of 15 feet. c) The request is reasonable given the location of the existing home. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following condition: 1. The home must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped, August 28, 2015. Appearing for the Applicant Andrew and Janelle Vick Discussion Commissioner Lee asked if the City has any plans to improve Brookside Terrace. Planner Aaker responded that Brookside Terraces has been a gravel road for decades and to date the City has no plans to improve it. Commissioner Olsen asked if the patio indicated on the plans is an existing structure. Planner Aaker responded it is; however, the setback for the existing patio is non-conforming; and if replaced as indicated would need a variance. Aaker explained staff felt that the setback variance for the patio could be avoided with redesign. Applicant Presentation Ms. Vick addressed the Commission and explained that Brookside Terrace is a gravel “street” that serves two homes to the rear of their property. Ms. Vick said their plans were shared with all neighbors who have indicated their support for the project. 9 With regard to the patio Mr. Vick said the patio would be rebuilt exactly as is; the size would not be increased. This allows the grove of trees that screen the patio to remain. Commissioner Carr asked for clarification on the patio. The architect reported that the existing patio would be removed to accommodate the renovations and then rebuilt. Chair Platteter asked if any trees would be removed. Mr. Vick responded that one tree would be removed, adding they recently planted a new Locust tree which would remain. Chair Platteter opened the public hearing Public Hearing No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public hearing carried. Discussion A discussion ensued on the existing patio and the patio after renovations are completed with Commissioners noting as presented that patio is buffered by a row of trees. Commissioners indicated they want those trees to remain. Commissioner Carr commented that she can support the request as submitted including the variance for the patio. She acknowledged the discussion on the patio and staff’s position that it could be redesigned to conform; stating she supports all variances including the variance for the patio being rebuilt in its entirety. Commissioner Hobbs said he agrees. Maintaining that row of trees is important and impact from the patio if any is minimal. Commissioner Thorsen also noted that the “street” Brookside Terrace could be considered a “shared driveway” since it only serves two homes. Chair Platteter asked if any portion of the patio was in the right-of-way. Planner Aaker responded that the patio was not in the right-of-way. Commissioner Lee said it was refreshing to see the majority of the house being left. She said the plans as presented are great; it’s a good approach, adding the street scape is interesting and the flow continues to make sense. Motion 10 Commissioner Olsen moved variance approval based on staff findings to include approval of the patio as depicted. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. D. Variance. Meriwether felt. 4100 Grimes Avenue, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker told the Commission the subject property is located west of Grimes Ave. consisting of a two and one half story home with a detached two car garage. The applicant is planning to move the detached garage back farther into the rear yard remodel the interior of the home and add a front porch to the façade to add interest and character to the home. The plan includes a front porch addition which requires a front yard setback variance. The front porch is proposed to be 8.58’ x 12.5’ or 107.25 square feet in area. The zoning ordinance requires that the front yard setback is established by averaging the front yard setbacks of the homes on either side. The average front yard setback required for the subject property is 35.34 feet. The existing home provides a 35.46 foot front yard setback which is slightly farther back than the average. The ordinance allows a porch to encroach into the required front yard setback area by a maximum of 80 square feet. The porch is proposed to be 8.58 feet deep by 12.5 feet wide. The porch exceeds the allowable encroachment of 80 square feet in the front yard area by 28 square feet. Aaker pointed out the home was originally a rambler built in 1958 that had a 1&1/2 story addition added in 1998 by a previous owner. The plan for a porch improves upon a previous remodel and addition to the original rambler with the current sturcture providing enough space without the need for a complete teardown-rebuild of the home. If the existing home were removed, a conforming plan could be designed with the desired front porch. The plan is to maintain the existing home so retrofitting the existing structure can be difficult given the current code requirements. The goal is to allow enough porch area to balance the front façade and allow seating. Planner Aaker concluded that staff supports the variance as proposed and puts forth the following findings: 1. With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The additions are to an existing home and must conform regarding current conditions. A porch would be easily attainable with all new construction, (tear-down/re-build). 2. The proposed porch will blend well with the eclectic nature of the Morningside neighborhood. 3. The imposed setback limits design opportunity for a porch. The intent of the ordinance is to provide adequate spacing from the street. The addition will enhance the property and will 11 not detract from the surrounding neighborhood and will still provide adequate spacing to the street. Appearing for the Applicant Meriwether Felt, Architect and Jonathan Glover property owner, Discussion Commissioner Forrest noted that the proposed porch must remain open. Planner Aaker agreed adding approval is conditioned on the porch remaining open. Commissioner Carr asked how far the porch would encroach into the front yard setback. Planner Aaker responded the encroachment is between 8.5-9-feet and the porch is 12 ½-feet wide. Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. Public Hearing No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion varied. Discussion Commissioner Strauss questioned if the Commission should revisit the 80 sq. ft. allowance if it appears that “number” isn’t working and the Commission continues to get variance requests. Chair Platteter commented that it doesn’t happen often; however, it’s a good point. Commissioner Forrest said originally the thought was to cover the stoops; however, in some instances covering the stoop can exceed the allowance. A discussion ensued with Commissioners agreeing the request made sense; the porch was proportional and reasonable. Motion Commissioner Car moved approval of the variance subject to staff findings and staff conditions. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Taprooms, Brewpubs, Wineries and Distilleries. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the City Council is considering an amendment to Chapter 4 of the City Code regarding alcoholic beverages. As part of that consideration the Planning Commission is asked to consider a zoning ordinance amendment to allow taprooms. brewpubs, breweries, and distilleries in Edina. Teague explained that currently code allows a brewery, distillery and winery in the PID, Planned Industrial District; however doesn’t allow a brewpub or taproom anywhere. The reason being is that currently a restaurant like Granite City the restaurant use is permitted; however, the distilling is not permitted in the PCD or MDD districts. Likewise a distillery is an approved use in the PID zoning district; however, a taproom or cocktail room would not be a permitted use in that district because the “retail” component isn’t allowed. Thus the need for amending the code. Teague said the City Council would like feedback from the Commission on amending the code to allow Taprooms, Brewpubs and Distilleries. Concluding, Planner Teague delivered a presentation highlighting Taprooms and Brewpubs in other communities and how those communities address them. Discussion Chair Platteter asked if a brewpub would be tied to food. Planner Teague responded that the draft ordinance for a brewpub requires a minimum of 30 restaurant seats. Teague explained that currently manufacturing isn’t permitted in the PCD district and the brewpub concept includes manufacturing with restaurant. Commissioner Thorsen stated with regard to allowing taprooms and the manufacturing of beer in the PID zoning district it may be wise to also allow food or food trucks. Planner Teague said the problem with that is a “sit down” food establishment and/or food trucks are not an allowed use in the PID zoning district. The PID district is for manufacturing; no retail which is why the code needs to be amended to allow not only the manufacturing aspect but the use of a “taproom” or “cocktail” room. Allowing food would be an additional component. Continuing, Thorsen said in his opinion if the City wants successful taprooms allowing food trucks in the PID zoning district would be important. Commissioners said they agreed, adding it is wise to allow food where alcoholic beverages are served. Commissioner Carr questioned if the City would put limitations on the number of taprooms or brewpubs allowed in the City. Teague responded that he believes there would be no limit; however, parking would need to comply, which may reduce location options. Chair Platteter questioned if there was a radius limit for proximity to residential or schools. Planner Teague responded that is addressed as part of the liquor permit licensing requirements 13 Commissioner Hobbs asked if law enforcement had weighed in on the proposed changes. Teague said law enforcement is involved and so far no red flags have been raised. Hobbs said it would be interesting to hear if “crime” went up in communities after they permitted taprooms and brewpubs. Teague said he would be willing to look into that and report back. Commissioner Strauss asked if anyone knows the hours of operation for taprooms, adding he assumes brewpubs would be open regular restaurant hours. It was reported that taprooms usually have limited hours because the owner(s) of the taproom(s) may also work another job. It was noted taprooms usually have limited evening and weekend hours. Commissioner Hobbs also asked if odor from distilling could become an issue. Planner Teague responded that odor is hard to assess; however, the City’s health department may know about the odor aspect of operating taprooms or brewpubs, adding he can check with them. Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague if other zoning districts should be considered. Planner Teague said he took a more conservative approach. Commissioners agreed a more conservative approach may be best until the City sees how the code amendments are working. Commissioner Nemerov asked if staff has received any feedback from those in the industry. Teague responded that he has received at least 5 inquiries from people wanting to open brewpubs; nothing on taprooms. A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that the proposed amendments are worth recommending and if the City Council decides to amend the code the following should be studied and/or recommended: • The Commission recommended that if the Council recommends approval of taprooms in the PID zoning district that they should seriously consider allowing food trucks in Edina. Commissioners said if allowed food trucks could be permitted only in specific zoning districts. • Survey other communities and find out if there had been any complaints on odors from the brewpubs and distilleries • Survey other communities and find out if law enforcement has noticed a “peak” in crime. A discussion ensued on parking with staff explaining that parking would be addressed on a case by case basis and if enough parking isn’t found a variance would be required. Commissioner Olsen said in certain instances she can see the use of shared parking. Teague agreed especially in large commercial and industrial nodes where shared parking is a common occurrence. Planner Teague thanked Commissioners for their input. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packet materials. 14 IX. CHAIR AND STAFF COMMENTS: Commissioners shared their comments on the differing committees they serve on. X. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Olsen moved meeting adjournment at 9:50 pm. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. ______________________________________ Respectfully submitted Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: B.3. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Heritage Preservation Board, October 13, 2015 Information CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: None. INT RODUCT ION: Minutes from October 13, 2016 Heritage Preservation Board Meeting. AT TACHMENT S: Description Minutes: Heritage Preservation Board, October 13, 2015 1 MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall – Community Room Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Weber and Members Christiaansen Moore, McLellan, Sussman, O’Brien, Birdman, Kelly, and Student Members Otness and Pruezer. Also present were Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member O’Brien moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member McLellan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES September 8, 2015 Member Birdman moved approval of the minutes from the September 8th meeting. Member O’Brien seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. Certificates of Appropriateness: 46 23 Wooddale Avenue New Front Entry Portico Planner Repya explained that the subject request involves adding a flat-roofed front entry portico with posts to the street facing façade of the home at 4623 Wooddale Avenue. The home, constructed in 1936 is a Colonial Revival style; and the proposed front entry portico has been designed to complement the home. Furthermore, the proposal is consistent with front entry porticos previously approved through the COA process in the district. Ms. Repya recommended approval of new portico subject to the plans presented. Applicant Present: Jeff Ruehl, 4623 Wooddale Avenue Motion: Following a brief discussion, Member Kelly moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request for a new front entry portico subject to the plans presented. Member McLellan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Wooddale Bridge - National Register of Historic Places Planner Repya reported that the MN State Review Board for nominations to the National Register of Historic Places will consider the historic 1937 Wooddale Bridge for addition to the register on November 17, 2015. Because Edina is a Certified Local Government (CLG), the 2 Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (MNSHPO) has invited the city to participate in the nomination process by submitting letters from the HPB as well as Mayor Hovland providing an opinion on the proposed nomination. Ms. Repya recommended that the board vote to provide MNSHPO with a letter of support for the upcoming National Register consideration. She added that she would also recommend that the board vote to commence with the local Edina Heritage Landmark designation of the bridge as identified in the HPB’s 2015 and pending 2016 work plans. Motion: #1- Member O’Brien moved to provide the MN State Historic Preservation Office with a letter of support for the upcoming consideration of adding the Wooddale Bridge to the National Register of Historic Places. Member Birdman seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. #2- Member Birdman moved that the HPB commence with the local designation of the Wooddale Bridge as identified in the HPB work plans for 2015 & 2016. Member McLellan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. Educational Opportunities Committee Committee Chair Christiaansen provided the board with an overview of the committee’s goals that focus on providing opportunities for the Edina community to engage in celebrating Edina’s heritage throughout the year with special events occurring during Preservation Month (May). The goals identified include: 1. Continue to organize tours of neighborhoods and landmarks in Edina throughout the year. 2. Continue the Annual Heritage Award - presented in May. 3. Organize a community education class on the Heritage of Edina. 4. Begin research on the possibility of collaborating with EHS students to develop an Edina Heritage app and/or digital map. 5. Begin research on the possibility of organizing an art/photography/writing competition for residents to showcase Edina Heritage - culminating in May to celebrate Preservation Month. The board engaged in a conversation on the identified goals. It was suggested that the committee also consider collaborating with the Edina Historical Society (EHS) to encourage the community to utilize the strength of both the EHS and the HPB. D. 2015 State Preservation Conference: Sept. 17 & 18: Report from Member Sussman Member Sussman provided an overview of the State Preservation Conference he attended in Little Falls representing the Edina HPB. He pointed out that this year is particularly significant since it is the 50th anniversary of the National Preservation Act - consequently, there is a large national directive for local governments to set their preservation standards; and to consider the significance of the recent history of the community too. Mr. Sussman concluded his comments by encourage fellow board members to participate in future state conferences which provide an excellent opportunity to step outside our community and see how preservation issues are being handled throughout Minnesota. E. 2015 Annual Certified Local Government (CLG) Report Planner Repya provided the board with a copy of the 2015 Annual CLG Report which provides information on Edina’s Heritage Preservation activities for fiscal year 2015 (October 1, 2014 - September 30, 2015). Ms. Repya explained that a copy of the report will be provided to the City 3 Council at the annual work session in December to compliment the report on the 2015 work plan activities. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS - None VIII. CHAIR AND MEMBER COMMENTS Member Sussman commented that Marci Matson, the Executive Director of the Edina Historical Society is retiring as of October 21st, and he suggested the HPB send a letter of appreciation to Ms. Matson for the work she has done to further historic preservation in Edina during her tenure. The board agreed that would be a good idea. Planner Repya agreed to send a letter to Ms. Matson on the board’s behalf. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Repya reported that the next meeting date will be November 10, 2015. X. ADJOURNMENT 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce Repya Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: B.4. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Park Board, October 13, 2015 Information CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: None. INT RODUCT ION: Approved Park Board Minutes, October 13, 2015. AT TACHMENT S: Description Park Board, October 13, 2015 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/10/2015 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Park Board Edina City Hall, Community Room October 13, 2015, 7 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Gieseke called the Oct. 13, 2015 Park Board meeting to order at 7 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Gieseke, Members Cella, Greene, Nelson, Jones, Segreto, Strother, Crist and Lohani. Absent were Members Good and McCormick. Staff present were Ann Kattreh, Susan Faus, Janet Canton, Amanda Clarke, Eric Boettcher, Patty McGrath, Susie Miller, Joe Abood, Donna Tilsner, Tom Shirley, MJ Lamon III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Member Segreto to approve the agenda. Motion seconded by Member Strother. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Member Strother to approve the Sept. 8, 2015 minutes. Motion seconded by Member Cella. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations None VI. Community Comment None VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Novus Board View Presentation MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator, made a presentation to the Park Board regarding the new agenda management software program that the city is now using for City Council, boards and commissions meetings. B. 2016 Parks & Recreation Fees and Charges Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/10/2015 Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director, presented the fees and charges to the Park Board. Staff members were present to answer Park Board’s questions and the Park Board discussed the proposed 2016 fees and charges. No changes were made to the proposed 2016 Parks & Recreation fees and charges. VIII. Chair and Member Comments Chair Gieseke thanked Member Jones for meeting with the resident who was at last month’s meeting concerned about buckthorn. Member Jones stated that after meeting with the resident she thinks the resident feels better about the situation. Ms. Kattreh added that staff also met with the resident. IX. Staff Comments Director Kattreh gave the following updates: • Construction at Braemar Golf Course is going great and added a lot of buckthorn has been eliminated and the Driving Range is going to be spectacular • Richard Mandell will be in Edina in early November to give a public presentation of the final version of the master plan • Tin Fish will be open all winter at Braemar Golf Course • Braemar Field has been rented out through the end of October, and the dome will be going up the first week of November • Recently there were two grand openings; one for the Promenade Phase IV and one for Pamela Park • There were two bidders that came in for the Pickleball courts at Rosland Park and both were high; they will be re-bidding the project in January • Director Kattreh stated she feels confident that by the end of the year the City of Edina will own 2/3 of Weber Woods; they are close to reaching an agreement with the City of Minneapolis • Last week the city received a grant for $6,000 for bike racks • There will be a work session with the City Council on Oct. 20 regarding the Strategic Plan; all of the information is the same but has been reformatted X. Adjournment Chair Gieseke made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:18 p.m. Member Greene seconded. Meeting adjourned. Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: XII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Meetings, Events & Dates As Of November 17, 2015 I nf ormation CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: INT RODUCT ION: AT TACHMENT S: Description Schedule of Meetings, Events & Dates As Of November 17, 2015 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF NOVEMBER 17, 2105 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues Nov 17 Work Session – 2016-17 Human Services Funding 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:00 P.M. Tues Nov 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 26 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Fri Nov 27 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Dec 1 Work Session – Finalize 2016 Work Plans/2016-2017 Budget 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Dec 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sat Dec 5 Town Hall Meeting 10:00 A.M. PAMELA PARK SHELTER Tues Dec 8 Special Meeting – Public Improvement Hearing 2016 Construction Projects 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 15 Work Session – Southdale Working Group 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session – Heritage Preservation Board 6:0 P.M. Tues Dec 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Fri Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OSBERVED – City Hall Closed Fri Jan 1 NEW YEAR’S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Jan 5 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jan 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jan 18 REV. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.,DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Jan 19 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jan 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Feb 2 Work Session – Mill Pond Assessment Review/Engineering Assessment Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Feb 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Feb 15 PRESIDENTS’ DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Feb 16 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Feb 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Debra Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes Of October 20, 2015 HRA Meeting CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Approve minutes. INT RODUCT ION: AT TACHMENT S: Description Draft HRA Minutes of October 20, 2015 Page 1 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OCTOBER 20, 2015 9:18 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 9:18 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Brindle, seconded by Commissioner Stewart approving the Meeting Agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 6, 2015 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Stewart, seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for October 6, 2015. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE GRANDVIEW DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION STUDY AWARDED Chair Hovland noted the item before the HRA was consideration of a contract for the Grandview District Transportation Study. He said the City Council had also awarded the contract and the project would be paid from the Grandview TIF District therefore, the HRA must also award the contract. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Brindle, made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Stewart to award the bid for the Grandview District Transportation Study to the recommended bidder, LHB, Inc. in the amount of $185,120. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: V. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Bill Neuendorf , Economic Development Manage Item Activity: Subject:Request For Purchase: Professional Services Contract Greater Southdale Area Planning Study – Phase 2 Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Approve prof essional services contract with Architectural Field Office. INT RODUCT ION: A professional services contract is recommended to be awarded to Architectural Field Office to complete Phase 2 of the Greater Southdale Area / France Avenue Planning Study. AT TACHMENT S: Description Request for Purchase: Professional Services Contract Greater Southdale Study Prof Services Agreement: AFO - Phase 2 Project Scope: AFO stage 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 November 17, 2015 Members of the Housing & Redevelopment Authority ☒ ☐ Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Request For Purchase: Professional Services Contract, Greater Southdale Area Planning Study, Phase 2 Not Applicable Not Applicable Architectural Field Office $30,000 Recommended Quote or Bid: Architectural Field Office (AFO) not to exceed $30,000.00 Information/Background: In March 2015, the City Council appointed members of the Greater Southdale/France Avenue Area Working Group to study development activity and establish working principles to guide new real estate development. The tasks of this group began in March and continued through the summer months when the Working Principles were completed. In October 2015, the City Council authorized staff to work with a planning consultant to continue the efforts of the Working Group and to prepare an illustrated plan that clarifies and refines the Working Principles. The contract for professional planning services is recommended to be awarded to Architectural Field Office (AFO). AFO was one of three firms interviewed by the members of the Working Group. The firm was the unanimous preference of the interview panel. Phase 2 of the Working Group began in October and deliverables for this phase are anticipated in February 2016. This work is to be funded through the HRA with available funds from the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District. 1 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 17th day of November, 2015, by and between the EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State ("Edina HRA") and Architecture Field Office, LLC under the laws of the State of Minnesota. IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The Edina HRA retains Consultant to: Conduct professional planning services and deliver work product as outlined in the attached Scope of Work dated November 2nd 2015. 2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the "Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein: A. This Professional Services Agreement B. Scope of Work In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts with Contract Document "A” having the first priority and Contract Document "B" having the last priority. 3. COMPENSATION. The Edina HRA shall pay the Consultant and the Consultant shall accept as payment $30,000 inclusive of reimbursables, taxes and all other charges (the “fee”). This fee shall not be adjusted if the estimated hour to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is exceeded. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed upon receipt of an invoice from the Consultant. Payment shall be due within 35 days of submittal of such invoice. 4. OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, software, diagrams, analyses, and information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of the Edina HRA. The Edina HRA may use the information for its purposes. The Edina HRA shall be the copyright owner. Vesting of the Edina HRA’s ownership of copyright shall be contingent upon the Edina HRA fulfilling its payment obligations hereunder. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be approved in advance and in writing by the Edina HRA. No payment will be due or made for work done in advance of such approval. 2 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the provisions of services to be provided. 7. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care, skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is included in this Agreement. Edina HRA shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of Consultant’s services. 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Edina HRA, its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, expense (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs) or claims for injury or damage arising out of the performance of this Agreement, caused by or resulting from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of The Consultant, its officers, directors, volunteers, agents or employees. 9. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, and from claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than: Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim The Edina HRA shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy. Before commencing work the Consultant shall provide the Edina HRA a certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to Edina HRA. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The Edina HRA hereby retains Consultant as an independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not an employee of the Edina HRA and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance under this Agreement. Edina HRA and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the Edina HRA or City of Edina. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation. 11. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the Edina HRA. Consultant shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by subcontractor within ten days of Consultant’s receipt of payment from Edina HRA. Consultant must pay interest of 1.5 percent per month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100 or more is $10. 3 12. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County. Any dispute arising out of the performance of this Agreement, if not settled by discussions between the parties, shall be first submitted to a mediator chosen by the parties and, if still not settled, then tried by a court of competent jurisdiction in Hennepin County, Minnesota. 13. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to (1) all data provided by the Edina HRA pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must immediately notify Edina HRA. Edina HRA will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold Edina HRA, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. 14. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs, drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the Edina HRA from loss or damage resulting therefrom. 15. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESES. If the Contract requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the Edina HRA. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the Edina HRA from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented designed, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and defend the Edina HRA for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 16. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, nor any interest arising herein, without the written consent of the other party. 17. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein. This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the provisions of this 4 Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties, unless otherwise provided herein. 19. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the Edina HRA for any reason or for convenience upon written notice to the Consultant. In the event of termination, the Edina HRA shall pay the Consultant for completed work. Consultant shall have the right, after 14 calendar days’ notice to the Edina HRA of its intention to do so, to terminate the contract for cause if the Edina HRA fails make payments of amounts due and owing hereunder. Dated: November 17th 2015. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BY: _______________________________ James B. Hovland, Chair BY: ________________________________ Ann Swenson, Secretary Dated: __________________, 20__. Architecture Field Office, LLC BY: _______________________________ Its ________________________________ o o o o o o o o Date: November 17, 2015 Agenda Item #: VI. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request f or Purchase Engineering Services for Valley View Rd Bike Lane Extension Action CITY OF EDIN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACT ION REQUEST ED: Authorize the Executive Director to sign professional services proposal with Alliant Engineering. INT RODUCT ION: Edina's 2008 Comprehensive Plan identif ies Valley View Road underneath Highway 62 as a primary bike route. This project will complete preliminary engineering or 30% design to continue those f acilities south to West 66th Street. I t will be funded by the Centennial Lakes TI F District. AT TACHMENT S: Description Request for Purchase Engineering Services for Valley View Road Bike Lane Extension Alliant Engineering Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 November 17, 2015 Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority ☒ ☐ Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Request for Purchase: Engineering Services for Valley View Rd Bike Lane Extension November 6, 2015 N/A Alliant Engineering $34,230 Recommended Quote or Bid: Alliant Engineering Information/Background: Edina’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan identifies Valley View Road underneath Highway 62 as a primary bike route. Recall the 2012 Bike Boulevard Project created bike lanes to just north of the Highway 62 bridge. This project will complete preliminary engineering or 30% design to continue those facilities south to West 66th Street. By having 30% design documents completed, the City is in a much better position to apply for grant monies that become available for the installation of these improvements. Alliant Engineering completed the previous bike boulevard project. That project completed some analysis of this area that they can use as a starting point for this work effort. Funding for the project will be utilized from the Centennial Lakes TIF District. Staff recommends approving the proposal with Alliant Engineering. G:\ENG\CONST\IMPRS\A265 SE Bike & Ped Impr\ADMIN\MISC\RFP VV Rd Bike Ln Extension_HRA.docx Memorandum TO: Chad Millner, P.E. City of Edina FROM: Mike Anderson, P.E., PTOE Steve Weser, P.E. Alliant Engineering, Inc. DATE: November 6, 2015 SUBJECT: Valley View Road – Bike Lane Extension Proposal ____________________________________________________________ As requested, Alliant Engineering (Alliant) has prepared a proposal for the preparation of a 30% preliminary engineering layout for the extension of bike lanes between TH 62 and 66th Street along Valley View Road. Project Understanding Based on discussions with the City of Edina on October 23, 2015 the following improvements will serve as the Scope of Work for this proposal: • Provide an 8 foot off street trail below the TH 62 Bridge (both sides) with connection to the existing on street bike lanes to the north. The bridge abutments will be modified to remove the slope and provide a vertical wall between the abutment and pier to create space. Bridge abutment design is not included as part of the scope of work. • The northbound bike lane will be either on street between 66th Street and 65th Street (removal of one northbound through lane) or off street via widening of the existing sidewalk. Potential pork chop and westbound free right turn lane modifications at Valley View Road/66th Street may be required. • The southbound bike lane will either cross perpendicular to the free right turn exit ramp from TH 62 to southbound Valley View Road onto an off street trail that will then follow Valley View Road until it crosses the pond via a new bridge; or be on street to 66th Street. • MnDOT has planned ADA improvements at the Valley View Road/65th Street and Valley View Road/TH 62 North Ramp intersections. The preliminary design will be compatible with those improvements to the extent feasible. Valley View Road Scope of Work November 6, 2015 Page 2 Scope of Work Task 1.0 Document Existing Conditions 1.1 Compile and review record plans - (The City of Edina shall provide asbuilts for City sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer.) Alliant will contact MnDOT to acquire record plan information as applicable. . 1.2 Request Gopher State One Call locates and mapping and add information into the project base mapping files. 1.3 Collect a field survey of the corridor (surface features, trees, utility locate markings, curbs, lane markings, etc.). 1.4 Update topographic file and develop project base mapping in microstation format 1.5 Field review of existing conditions. 1.6 Traffic counts – Alliant will collect one day peak AM and PM hour turning movement counts at the following intersections: - Eastbound TH 62 to Valley View Road exit ramp - 66th Street and Valley View Road Task 1.0 Assumptions 1) Topographic information and existing survey data will be provided by the City of Edina. Based on the availability and quality of this information, the amount of additional field survey work will be identified. 2) Our scope does not include utility meetings or coordination. 3) Right of way verification is not included. Task 2.0 Conceptual Design 2.1 Traffic Operations Analysis – Preform high level evaluation of Valley View Road/65th Street and 66th Street intersections to determine feasibility to remove travel lanes, reduce free right turn movement speeds or to remove free right turn movement. Results of this analysis will be discussed with City of Edina and MnDOT prior to proceeding on any potential concept layout work that modifies the Valley View Road/65th Street intersection geometrics. 2.2 Concept Sketches–Develop concept sketch alternatives to illustrate the couple different options in connecting the bike lanes to 66th Street. Concept sketches will be high level and be for discussion purpose prior to developing the preliminary layout. Task 3.0 Preliminary Layout 3.1 Prepare 30% preliminary layout of the preferred bike lane and off-street trail configurations. Deliverable will be a full colorized layout overlaid on inplace aerial or topography and will show all design elements and typical sections. 3.2 Identify utility relocates. The utility conflicts will be only noted at this time and no coordination is assumed. 3.3 Autoturn Analysis – Run autoturn analysis on the preferred intersection geometrics where applicable. 3.4 Prepare Engineers Estimate – Prepare quantity take off and 30% Engineer’s Estimate of construction costs based on the design layout. Task 3.0 Assumptions Valley View Road Scope of Work November 6, 2015 Page 3 1) This proposal does not include any efforts associated with the acquisition of right-of-way or easements. If right-of-way is needed, areas will be denoted on the preliminary layout. 2) This proposal assumes no environmental investigation efforts associated with, but not limited to, wetland impacts, wetland mitigation, historical properties, endangered species, socio/economic studies, etc. 3) Software to be utilized on the project include Bentley MicroStation, Bentley GEOPAK, Transoft AutoTurn, and Microsoft Office titles. 4) This proposal assumes the additional impervious area as a result of the improvements is less than one (1) acre. As a result, this proposal does not include the design of additional stormwater treatment facilities. 5) Cost estimating will include an estimation of storm sewer and public utility relocation costs based on available record plans and field reviews. The conceptual design effort will not include detailed pavement spread and pipe capacity analyses. Storm sewer construction costs included in the Engineer’s Estimate will be based on engineering judgment upon review of the record plans and field reviews. 6) Cost estimate for structural work and modifications to the bridge abutments at TH 62 will be provided by others. Task 4.0 Project Management and Meetings 4.1 Meetings • Project Team Meeting – Alliant will meet with City of Edina staff to discuss concepts and preliminary design layout. (Assume three meeting) • Meeting with City of Edina and MnDOT discuss potential concepts relating to the Valley View Road/65th Street intersection. (Assume one meeting) 4.2 Project management and miscellaneous coordination • Project documentation and invoicing Task 4.0 Assumptions This task does not include public involvement, City Council, or other City committee meeting attendance. Project Schedule The following project schedule milestone dates are anticipated: • Authorization to Begin: November 16, 2015 • Traffic Ops and Concept Sketches: December 18, 2015 • 30% Layout: February 29, 2015 • Final Submittal: March 28, 2015 Attachments Attachment A – Project Hour Estimate Attachment A – Project Hour Estimate November 6, 2015 Page 4 Staff Hour and Cost Estimate Task Description Dollars Project Manager Project Engineer Data Collector Survey Crew TEAM TOTAL TASK TOTAL 1.0 Document Existing Conditions 10 71 20 40 141 13,690.00 1.1 Compile and Review Record Plans 2 4 0 0 6 640.00 1.2 Gopher One Call and Mapping 1 16 0 0 17 1,580.00 1.3 Field Survey 1 24 0 40 65 7,500.00 1.4 Topo File and Base Mapping 2 16 0 0 18 1,720.00 1.5 Field Reivew 4 8 0 0 12 1,280.00 1.6 Traffic Counts 0 3 20 0 23 970.00 2.0 Conceptual Design 6 32 0 0 38 3,720.00 2.1 Traffic Operation Analysis 2 8 0 0 10 1,000.00 2.2 Concept Sketches 4 24 0 0 28 2,720.00 3.0 Preliminary Layout 33 116 0 0 149 15,060.00 3.1 30% Preliminary Layout (Sheets) 24 96 0 0 120 12,000.00 3.2 Identify Utility Relocates 4 4 0 0 8 920.00 3.3 Autoturn Analysis 1 4 0 0 5 500.00 3.4 SEQ and Engineer Estimate 4 12 0 0 16 1,640.00 4.0 Meetings 10 4 0 0 14 1,760.00 4.1 Project Team Meetings (4) 8 4 0 0 12 1,480.00 4.2 Project Management 2 0 0 0 2 280.00 PROJECT TOTAL 59 223 20 40 342 34,230.00 Hours