Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-12-01 City Council Meeting
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota City Council Chambers Tuesday, December 1, 2015 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval of Meeting Agenda IV.Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes of November 17, 2015 City Council Regular Meeting and November 17, 2015 Work Session Meeting B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 11/12/2015 TOTAL: $1,159,926.25 And Per Pre-List Dated 11/19/2015 TOTAL $1,225,857.02 C.Ordinance No. 2015-24: Amending Chapter 2 Concerning Boards & Commissions D.2016 Calendar of Meetings With Revisions E.Resolution No. 2015-117: Approving Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2016 F.Resolution No. 2015-118: Approving Park and Recreation Fees for 2016 G.2016 Human Services Funding Recommendation H.Request For Purchase: Finance Department Utility Billing Electronic Bill Pay and Presentment (EBPP) I.Resolution No. 2015-122: Approving Deferral of Special Assessments J.2016 Board/Commission Applicant Interview Dates K.Local 49 2016-2017 Bargaining Unit Contract L.Approve Cooperative Agreement Between Edina and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for the Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project V.Special Recognitions And Presentations VI.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staC members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eDcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.Public Hearing: 2016 Building & Liquor License Fees, Ordinance No. 2015-25: Amending City Code Chapter 2, Section 2-724 Schedule A, Setting Fees for 2016 B.Public Hearing: Review of 2016 Operating Budget, Resolution No. 2015-121: Setting 2016 Tax Levy and Adopting 2016 Operating Budget C.Resolution No. 2015-119 & 2015-120: Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning at 6612 Xerxes and 3101 66th Street West for Bull Moose Construction VII.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staC for consideration at a future meeting. VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Approve Lease Agreement with Cooperative Energy Futures for Community Solar Garden on Public Works Building B.Resolution No. 2015-113: Accepting Various Grants & Donations IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence B.Disbanding of Bike Edina Working Group C.Minutes 1.Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, October 8, 2015 2.Minutes: Arts and Culture Commission, August 27, 2015 3.Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission, Oct. 22, 2015 4.Minutes: Planning Commission, October 28, 2015 5.Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission October 27, 2015 X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor and Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments XIII.Schedule of Meetings, Events & Dates As Of December 1, 2015 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliJcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From: Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes of November 17, 2015 City Council Regular Meeting and November 17, 2015 Work Session Meeting CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description November 17, 2015 Draft Work Session Minutes November 17, 2015 Draft Regular Meeting Minutes MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 17, 2015 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 5:35 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was: Members Brindle, Staunton S t e w a r t , S w e n s o n , a n d M a y o r Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator; Devin Massopust, City Manager Fellow; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; and Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager. HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING RECOMMENDATION 2016/2017 Human Services Funding Task Force attending the meeting were: Sarah Rinn, Task Force Chair (Human Rights and Relations Commission); Bruce McLellan (Heritage Preservation Board); Ellen Jones (Park Board); and Gabe Brosius (Student Member). Chair Rinn presented the Task Force’s funding recommendations for 2016/2017. Staff and Task Force Members responded to questions of the Council. Discussion topics included level of funding, number of Edina residents served various agencies, cost per Edina resident served and how the interface with the Edina Resource Center worked. The Mayor and Council thanked the Task Force for their work. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION JOINT MEETING Humans Rights and Relations Commissioners attending the meeting were: Chair Pat Arseneault, Vice Chair Ellen Kennedy, Members: Jasna Burza, Sarah Rinn, Jan Seidman, Tony Tian, Maggie Vecchio- Smith and Student Members: Sid Ramesh and Caitlin Kearney. HRRC Members led the City Council through their progress on the 2015 HRRC Work Plan highlighting points regarding: Community Conversations held in 2015, potential Human Rights City designation, 2015 Days of Remembrance/Genocide Awareness, HRRC input on the Affordable Housing Policy, the body image and sexuality awareness work with the high school, and the Combating Human Trafficking event held in April. The Mayor and Council thanked the Commission for their work. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 1, 2015 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 17, 2015 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.D. 2016 Calendar of Meeting Dates; IV.E. Resolution No. 2015-114 Receiving Engineering Studies for 2016 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects; and, IV.K. Request for Purchase, Engineering Services for Valley View Road Bike Lane Extension, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of November 4, 2015 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 29, 2015, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $226,091.68; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $33,443.54; Working Capital Fund $1,208,025.39; PIR Construction Fund $4,184.36; Equipment Replacement Fund $29.99; Art Center Fund $1,526.94; Golf Dome Fund $61.55; Aquatic Center Fund $127.03; Golf Course Fund $8,112.12; Ice Arena Fund $36,077.35; Sports Dome Fund $321,830.46; Edinborough Park Fund $5,779.44; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,963.54; Liquor Fund $158,093.28; Utility Fund $575,890.24; Storm Sewer Fund $497,250.36; PSTF Agency Fund $34,452.03; Grandview TIF District $262.50; Payroll Fund $2,701.80; TOTAL $3,050,016.52 and for receipt of payment of claims dated November 5, 2015, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $191,237.30; Police Special Revenue $38,327.63; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $45,019.87; Arts and Culture Fund $1,004.00; Working Capital Fund $309,192.76; Equipment Replacement Fund $122,040.25; Cando Fund $8,982.00; Art Center Fund $3,412.92; Golf Dome Fund $1,517.99; Aquatic Center Fund $790.83; Golf Course Fund $6,350.79; Ice Arena Fund $9,879.25; Sports Dome Fund $232.86; Edinborough Park Fund $50,870.05; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $100.00; Liquor Fund $181,105.87; Utility Fund $124,020.86; Storm Sewer Fund $33,296.08; PSTF Agency Fund $2,993.52; Centennial TIF District $18,820.79; TOTAL $1,149,195.62; and, Credit Card Transactions dated July 26 – August 24, 2015; TOTAL $38,810.21 IV.C. Approve New On-Sale Wine and Beer Licenses, Z Italiano, 1705 Southdale Center IV.D. 2016 Calendar of Meeting Dates Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17, 2015 Page 2 IV.E. Resolution No. 2015-114, Receiving Engineering Studies for 2016 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects IV.F. Request for Purchase, Motorola MCC7500 Radio Consoles for 911 Communications Center, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Motorola Solutions at $300,206.00 IV.G. Approve 2015 Edina Community Council Appointments IV.H. Request for Purchase, Edinborough Park Security Camera Replacement, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Pro-Tec Design at $68,805.84 IV.I. Request for Purchase, Engineering Services for Sanitary Capacity Evaluation, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Barr Engineering Company at $165,205.00 IV.J. Approve Traffic Safety Report of October 7, 2015 IV.K. Request for Purchase, Engineering Services for Valley View Road Bike Lane Extension Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.D. 2016 CALENDAR OF MEETING DATES – APPROVED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to move the January 19, 2015, City Council meeting to January 20, 2015, and the February 16, 2015, City Council meeting to February 17, 2015; and, to approve the remainder of the 2016 Council meeting dates and draft calendar of Board and Commission meeting dates. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-114 RECEIVING ENGINEERING STUDIES FOR 2016 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS – ADOPTED Mr. Millner answered a question of the Council relating to the process of communication with neighborhoods prior to roadway reconstruction. He explained the process and noted that staff does not meet with neighbors that were outside of the actual construction. He suggested notifying the neighborhood association. The Council supported sending a letter to the neighborhood association that could be distributed more widely. Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-114, Receiving Engineering Studies for 2016 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Projects: Tracy Avenue from Benton Avenue to TH 62, Improvement No. BA-399; Golf Terrace B Neighborhood, Improvement No. BA-420; Strachauer Park A Neighborhood, Improvement No. BA-421; Morningside A Neighborhood, Improvement No. BA-422; and White Oaks C Neighborhood, Improvement No. BA-438. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.K. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR VALLEY VIEW ROAD BIKE LANE EXTENSION – APPROVED Mr. Millner answered a question of the Council relating to why this item had not been before the Edina Transportation Commission. He explained that the project would lay out options for the Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17, 2015 Page 3 Edina Transportation Commission to consider. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the Request for Purchase, Engineering Services for Valley View Road Bike Lane Extension, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Alliant Engineering at $34,230. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONER JAN CALLISON – PRESENTED Jan Callison, Hennepin County Commissioner, updated the Council on 2016 property taxes, Southdale, and 50th and France. Commissioner Callison answered a question of the Council relating to healthcare services. V.B. GRANDVIEW DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION STUDY – PRESENTED Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner, introduced Michael Fischer, LHB. Mr. Fischer described the project history, the role of the transportation study, the role of Convene Week, and the project's next steps including Imagine Week and Recommend Week. V.C. OCTOBER SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED – TOPIC: PARKS, RECREATION, AND PROGRAMMING Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of October opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to parks, recreation, and programming. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, receiving the October 2015 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion report about parks, recreation, and programming. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-113 DENIAL OF A SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCES FOR BANK OF AMERICA, 6868 FRANCE AVENUE – CONTINUED TO JANUARY 5, 2016 Community Development Director Teague shared that at the November 4, 2015, meeting the Council directed staff to prepare findings for denial. The applicant submitted a letter requesting an extension to January 5, 2016. Staff recommended continuing action to the January 5, 2016 City Council meeting. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, continuing consideration of Resolution No. 2015-113, Denying a Site Plan with Variances to Build a 7,190 Square Foot Building at 6868 France Avenue, to the January 5, 2016 City Council meeting. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. GRANDVIEW FACILITY OPERATIONAL AND FEASIBILITY STUDY – APPROVED Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17, 2015 Page 4 Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh presented the plan to continue to refine the concept of a "Community Facility" at Grandview. Staff suggested completing a detailed programming, operational, and financial feasibility study. The recently completed preliminary work needed further study, research, and refinement before the Parks and Recreation staff and Park Board were able to make a recommendation to the Council on facility and programmatic components of a potential community facility. Staff had identified a consulting team including: HGA Architecture, PROS Consulting, and Sutton + Associates. Ms. Kattreh discussed the formation of a task force, project costs and funding sources, and the four-month project timeline. The Council discussed a possible conflict of interest with Sutton + Associates. Ms. Kattreh and Michael Frey, Edina Art Center General Manager, answered questions of the Council relating to experience with Mr. Sutton and the possible conflict of interest. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the plan to complete a Grandview facility operational and feasibility study, including the formation of a task force to work on the project. Member Stewart noted that he was uncomfortable with the cost. The Council discussed the cost of the study and whether it was a worthwhile expenditure. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, GRANDVIEW FACILITY OPERATIONAL AND FEASIBILITY STUDY – APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving the Request for Purchase, Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study, awarding the bid to the recommended bidders: HGA Architecture at $52,100; PROS Consulting at $27,500; and, Sutton + Associates at $12,500. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-116 FINAL PLAT AND TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT 6209 CREST LANE FOR RIDGE CREEK HOMES – ADOPTED Mr. Teague shared that the City Council had approved the Preliminary Plat on October 6, 2015. The Final Plat was the same as the approved Preliminary Plat. The applicant had met the conditions of approval including submittal of a grading and drainage plan that had been approved by engineering. The applicant, with staff and the City Forester, had also drafted a tree preservation easement protecting mature trees along the south lot lines. Mr. Millner answered questions of the Council relating to the grading and drainage plan. Mayor Hovland noted that he and Member Brindle had voted against the Preliminary Plat on October 6, 2015. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-116, Approving a Final Plat and Tree Preservation Easement at 6209 Crest Lane, subject to the following conditions: Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17, 2015 Page 5 1. Compliance with the conditions required by the engineering memo dated September 2, 2015. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: • Submit evidence of Nine Mile Creek Watershed district approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. • A curb-cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. • A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. • A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. • Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. 3. Staff files the tree preservation easement protecting the mature trees along the south side of both lots. 4. The first floor elevations of each of the two new homes shall not exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson Nays: Brindle, Hovland Motion carried. VII.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-115 ADOPTED – ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-115 accepting various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. MINUTES: 1. PLANNING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 14, 2015 2. PLANNING COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 3. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, OCTOBER 13, 2015 4. PARK BOARD, OCTOBER 13, 2015 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS, AND DATES AS OF NOVEMBER 17, 2015 – Received Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17, 2015 Page 6 XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 1, 2015. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the November 17, 2015, meeting available. Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 11/12/2015 TOTAL: $1,159,926.25 And Per Pre-List Dated 11/19/2015 TOTAL $1,225,857.02 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment. INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Claims Pre-List Dated 11/12/2015 TOTAL: $1,159,926.25 Claims Pre-List Dated 11/19/2015 TOTAL: $1,225,857.02 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2228 11/12/2015 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 330.55 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 386663 21506153 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 5,884.19 EAST DOOR REPAIR 386664 21507151 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 6,214.74 2229 11/12/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 85.20 386549 1948110 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 85.20 2230 11/12/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 511.96 COFFEE 386243 1200132 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 72.65 COFFEE 386607 1200135 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 584.61 2231 11/12/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 277.65 386554 50871500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 181.81 386555 50871700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 719.30 386553 50871800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 50.23 386556 92935900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,228.99 2232 11/12/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 32.80- 386388 CP-OE-405798-1- 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1 6.79- 386387 CP-OE-407639-1- 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1 19.54- 386386 CP-OE-407639-1- 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 2 22.92- 386385 CP-OE-407912-1- 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1 52.79 386384 0E-407639-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 4.07 386383 0E-407689-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 30.91 386382 0E-407912-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 31.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 386381 0E-408040-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 22.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003015 386499 WO-155466-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 137.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 386431 WO-155574-1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 197.70 2233 11/12/2015 132444 BOLTON 8. MENK INC. 4,109.00 PICKLEBALL CT PROJECT 386245 0183433 47095.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ROSLAND PK - PICKLEBALL COURTS 4,109.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2233 2234 11/12/2015 11/12/2015 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC Continued... 1,255.00 MATERIALS TESTING 386500 B042492 01413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION EDINA HIGHLANDS LAKESIDE RECON 1,255.00 2235 11/12/2015 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 806.77 OCE MAINTENANCE 386394 988554953 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 806.77 2236 11/12/2015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 5,311.00 COUNCIL CHAMBERS SWITCH 386247 ZZ45787 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 1,497.40 PCS FOR CENT LAKES POS 00004398 386611 ZZ49529 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 6,808.40 2237 11/12/2015 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 547.47 XCEL BILL FOR LS 00001915 386395 6352 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 547.47 2238 11/12/2015 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 386505 2467673 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 2239 11/12/2015 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 370.19 VFD 00001900 386405 7579 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 370.19 2240 11/12/2015 129508 IMPACT 664.71 MAIL OCT LATE NOTICES 386535 107663 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 664.71 2241 11/12/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 288.65 PIPING REPAIR 00001899 386508 952765 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 441.71 CHEMICAL PUMP LUBE 00001867 386509 953062 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 730.36 2242 11/12/2015 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. 1,500.00 SPRINKLER ANNUAL INSPECTION 386619 116998 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,500.00 2243 11/12/2015 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 - 11/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2243 11/12/2015 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. Continued... 1,960.00 SPECIAL HAZARDS INSPECTION 386620 117068 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,960.00 2244 11/12/2015 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 7,637.44 CLAIM LOSS 386668 218656 6001.8070 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE RISK MGMT REVENUES 7,637.44 2245 11/12/2015 101483 MENARDS 23.73 SPRINKLER PARTS 00006428 386625 98396 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 22.55 ELECTRICAL/HVAC STOCK 00001976 386347 98904 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 104.10 T-POSTS 00001979 386346 98942 1647.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK PATHS & HARD SURFACE 38.74 WALL CLOCK, BATTERIES 00001992 386348 99070 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 189.12 2246 11/12/2015 100898 MINVALCO 226.99 ACTUATOR FOR BOILER 00001971 386540 016710 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 226.99 2247 11/12/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 5,476.23 REAR AXLE 00006422 386627 1039882-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 31.52 BEARINGS 00006425 386628 1041781-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20.57 GASKET 00006429 386629 1042024-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5,528.32 2248 11/12/2015 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 1,982.70 TABLE COVERS 386269 369401 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,982.70 2249 11/12/2015 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 NOV 2015 SERVICES 386672 3875 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 658.75 2250 11/12/2015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 298.50 TIRES 00005715 386270 210201589 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 298.50 2251 11/12/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 494.79 TISSUE, LINERS, GLOVES 00002281 386272 8578 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 302.67 LINERS, TOWELS, SOAP 00002078 386654 8608 5765.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 797.46 R55CKR2 LOG1S101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 -- Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2251 2252 11/12/2015 11/12/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. Continued... 2,263.00 BACKYARD RINK PAINT 386674 0058351-IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MA1NT 2,263.00 2253 11/12/2015 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 1,250.00 REPLACE VALVES & HOSE ADAPTERS 386542 67034 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,250.00 2254 11/12/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 128.50 BUSINESS CARDS 386657 88313 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 128.50 2255 11/12/2015 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 219.00 386478 15-2022 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 219.00 2256 11/12/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 390.71 HVAC VALVES 00001938 386646 S3159823.001 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 96.56 PIPING REPAIR PARTS 00001898 386520 S3163457.001 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 50.33 GAS PIPING PARTS 00001981 386521 S3164979.001 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 537.60 2257 11/12/2015 101015 STREICHERS 179.98 UNIFORMS 00003679 386546 11177826 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 179.98 2258 11/12/2015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 268.88 BAR, PAD 00005835 386659 115670 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 222.76 RIVET, CAP 386660 116438 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 222.76- RETURN 386661 CM116438 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 268.88 2259 11/12/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 40.25 386590 0136525-IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 129.00 386591 0137067-1N 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 552.50 386589 0137068-1N 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 287.25 386592 0137069-1N 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,009.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 - 11/12/2015 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Page - 5 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2260 11/12/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 577.90 386487 408484-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 577.90 398783 11/6/2015 106459 CLASSIC CATERING 2,732.12 EMPLOYEE LUNCHEON 386548 4680 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 2,732.12 398784 11/12/2015 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO, INC, 50.24 HVAC PARTS 00001832 386380 424946 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 28.29 GAS PIPING REPAIRS 00001974 386319 430729 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 78.53 398785 11/12/2015 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 73.96 SHOES 386605 901509637 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 76.21 HATS 386606 901522031 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 150.17 398786 11/12/2015 110981 ADOLFSON & PETERSON CONSTRUCTION 8,896.93 CONCRETE REPAIRS 386242 6433-104 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8,896.93 398787 11/12/2015 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN 214.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386429 103015 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 214.00 398788 11/12/2015 100595 ANOKA COUNTY 100.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 386430 110515 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 100.00 398789 11/12/2015 135988 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS 794.75 NOV 2015 ADMIN FEES 386665 11550 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 794.75 398790 11/12/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 71.25 386455 3063439 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,252.50 386456 3063443 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 133.50 386550 3064845 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,912.00 386551 3064847 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7.00- 386552 327008 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,362.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398790 398791 11/12/2015 11/12/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 102195 BATTERIES PLUS Continued... 256.18 REPLACEMENT BATTERIES 00001006 386498 018-103537-01 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 19.20 BATTERIES 00003013 386244 018-386797 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.38 398792 11/12/2015 101343 BEHR, JASON 85.50 BOARDING K9 BLADE 386608 110615 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 85.50 398793 11/12/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 355.70 386457 256015 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 364.80 386458 257497 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 720.50 398794 11/12/2015 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 83.33 CANDY 386609 110515 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 83.33 398795 11/12/2015 130922 BI WORLDWIDE 2,317.00 ANNIVERSARY CARDS 386610 ME-675752 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 2,317.00 398796 11/12/2015 136871 BLACKLIST BEER LLC 430.00 386459 1151026809 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 430.00 398797 11/12/2015 102852 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHEILD OF MN 1,420.17 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 386529 VIKKI AUZENNE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,420.17 398798 11/12/2015 137514 BLUMENSON, JUNE 229.50 CRAFTING A POEM 386432 INSTRUCTOR 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 229.50 398799 11/12/2015 123414 BOOM, CHET 113.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386436 102915 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 113.98 398800 11/12/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398800 11/12/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS Continued... 352.50 386557 129921 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 352.50 398801 11/12/2015 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 75.98 GLASS 00005781 386320 105550D 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 617.90 GLASS REPAIR - WALNUT PK 386389 529746S 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 693.88 398802 11/12/2015 122195 BRUNSWICK ZONE - EDEN PRAIRIE 114.40 EDINA JRS BOWLING LEAGUE 386433 1839607,1839606 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 114.40 398803 11/12/2015 104595 BUCKENTINE, JOHN 180.91 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386435 103015 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 180.91 398804 11/12/2015 137515 BUCKHOLZ, PATRICIA 22.00 DRIVING CLASS REFUND 386434 110415 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 398805 11/12/2015 102482 CAMPBELL PET COMPANY 1,047.23 OFF LEASH PARK COLLARS 386246 0320191-IN 1450.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ANIMAL CONTROL 1,047.23 398806 11/12/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 140.00 386462 00011056 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 50.30 386558 00011057 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 211.00 386460 727313 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 453.80 386461 733406 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 855.10 398807 11/12/2015 137138 CASTLE DANGER BREWING CO LLC 606.20 386463 3981 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 606.20 398808 11/12/2015 129923 CAWLEY 38.39 NAME BADGES 386642 V331247 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 38.39 398809 11/12/2015 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398809 11/12/2015 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued_ 26.55 386321 102715 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50.13 386321 102715 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 101.01 386321 102715 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 192.57 386321 102715 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 523.31 386321 102715 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 294.19 386321 102715 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 37.81 386321 102715 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 306.81 386321 102715 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 3,070.30 386321 102715 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 149.55 386321 102715 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 18.75 386321 102715 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 34.79 386321 102715 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 35.29 386321 102715 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 92.00 386321 102715 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 123.00 386321 102715 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 875.80 386321 102715 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 5,931.86 398810 11/12/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 56.59 952 929-0297 386249 0297-10/15 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 95.23 952 941-1019 386252 1019-10/15 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 60.39 952 941-1410 386251 1410-10/15 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 114.17 952 826-7398 386250 7398-10/15 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 58.77 952 920-8632 386322 8632-10/15 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 432.71 952 927-8861 386248 8861-10/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 817.86 398811 11/12/2015 102504 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 80.00 IT CONFERENCE - RYAN BROWNING 386253 12958 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 80.00 398812 11/12/2015 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 2,717.78 00082198-0200815001 386392 200815001-10/15 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 324.21 00114064-0203163012 386324 203163012-10/15 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 709.24 00101025-0203600013 386390 203600013-10/15 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 1,191.74 00101025-0203610011 386391 203610011-10/15 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 395.93 00114667-0210000012 386323 210000012-10/15 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 5,338.90 398813 11/12/2015 120433 COMCAST R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398813 11/12/2015 120433 COMCAST Continued... 9.01 8772 10 614 0161120 386666 161120-10/15 5510.6188 TELEPHONE ARENAADMINISTRATION 232.26 8772 10 614 0177449 386612 177449-10/15 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 241.27 398814 11/12/2015 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 6,252.36 HOT MIX 386393 101515 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 6,252.36 398815 11/12/2015 137086 CRAFTSMEN HOME IMPROVEMENT 101.40 PERMIT REFUND 386437 ED142694 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 101.40 398816 11/12/2015 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,095.46 BIKE BOTTLES 386254 41945 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,095.46 398817 11/12/2015 137513 CREEKSTONE VENTURES LLC 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 386363 5821 DREWAVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 386364 5821 DREWAVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 REFUND CO ESCROW 386365 5821 DREWAVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 15,000.00 398818 11/12/2015 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 1,250.16 NOV/DEC NEWSLETTERS 386396 304685 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,250.16 398819 11/12/2015 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 493.90 HOSE 00005863 386643 81239 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 493.90 398820 11/12/2015 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 2,640.00 REPORTS, SCADA WORK 00001917 386397 10616 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,640.00 398821 11/12/2015 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 26.34 SOCKETS 00005662 386255 41872 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.58 STYLUS 386256 46485 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 61.92 398822 11/12/2015 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398822 11/12/2015 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Continued... 12,401.18 OCT 2015 SURCHARGE 386667 23645053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 12,401.18 398823 11/12/2015 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 99.00 651972955 386644 651972955-10/15 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 99.00 398824 11/12/2015 102454 DRISTE, BRIAN 13.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386438 103015 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13.00 398825 11/12/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 39.10 PUBLISH NOTICE 386325 266991 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 188.87 PUBLISH SAMPLE BALLOT 386326 269161 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 44.68 PUBLISH NOTICE 386327 269162 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 463.59 PUBLISH NOTICE OF ELECTION 386328 269163 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 55.85 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 386329 269164 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 55.85 PUBLISH NOTICE 386330 271167 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 2,450.55 EDITION EDINA 386398 272005 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 3,298.49 398826 11/12/2015 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 331.60 ELEC STOCK FOR STREETLIGHTS 00001994 386399 12510300 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 331.60 398827 11/12/2015 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1,362.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 386257 36256 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 1,362.00 398828 11/12/2015 103594 EDINALARM INC. 343.07 ALARM MONITORING 386613 100694 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 343.07 398829 11/12/2015 134601 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES INC. 5,669.66 STREET RATINGS 5960.610 386501 01169-0003-3 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 5,669.66 398830 11/12/2015 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 295.20 386559 4720 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 295.20 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398830 398831 11/12/2015 11/12/2015 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 135208 ESCAPE FIRE Continued... 235.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 386530 16320 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 235.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 386531 16321 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 470.00 398832 11/12/2015 102179 BULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 501.44 CATCH BASIN BLOCK AND RINGS 00001983 386502 026537 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 501.44 398833 11/12/2015 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 209.40 386560 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 209.40 398834 11/12/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 232.47 BATTERIES 00005734 386331 1-Z05887 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 201.78 BATTERIES 00005734 386332 1-Z05888 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.22 BATTERY 386503 69-200141 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.22 BATTERY 386504 69-200356 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.40 OIL 386645 69-200450 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 577.09 398835 11/12/2015 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 225.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 386646 110415 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 225.00 398836 11/12/2015 134984 FAHRNER ASPHALT SEALERS LLC 6,250.00 INFRARED PATCHES 386400 33530 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 6,250.00 398837 11/12/2015 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 96.92 BOLTS 00001854 386333 MNTC2133294 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 2.61 SPADE BIT 00001860 386334 MNTC2133298 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 9.22 SCREWS 00005700 386335 MNTC2133321 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.80 BOLTS 00001860 386336 MNTC2133322 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 168.55 398838 11/12/2015 130136 FAUS, SUSAN 95.45 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 386366 103015 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 95.45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398838 398839 11/12/2015 11/12/2015 130136 FAUS, SUSAN 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS Continued... 194.44 REPLACEMENT METER HEAD 00001910 386260 0163105-1 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 239.68 MISC WATER PARTS 00001908 386259 0171025 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 115.80 WATER METER AND ACCESSORIES00001909 386258 0171256 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 549.92 398840 11/12/2015 134850 FISHER, DAVID 296.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 386614 110615 1495.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE INSPECTIONS 296.70 398841 11/12/2015 137519 FISHER, DAVID 75.09 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 386647 6809 CORNELIA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 75.09 398842 11/12/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 ACCT 0012939 386615 1006364155 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 19.94 ACCT 1108799 386337 102515 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 46.88 ACCT 1108799 386337 102515 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 125.47 ACCT 1108799 386337 102515 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 206.42 ACCT 1108799 386337 102515 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 233.31 ACCT 1108799 386337 102515 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 27.55 386337 102515 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 111.80 ACCT 1108799 386337 102515 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 786.37 398843 11/12/2015 102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. 91,598.83 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 386506 S-111 SIDEWALK 07111.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5-111 INTERLACHEN BLVD 91,598.83 398844 11/12/2015 136577 GAGNON INC. 1,152.76 DUCT INSULATION 00001726 386532 60164 450003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT MECH INSULATION 1,152.76 398845 11/12/2015 104877 GENERAL SPRINKLER CORP. 466.09 ANNUAL FIRE SYST INSPECTION 386616 21943 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 466.09 398846 11/12/2015 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 1,429.05 OCT 2015 TICKETS 356401 149446 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398846 398847 11/12/2015 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 129585 GOSSARD, TRAVIS Continued... 11/12/2015 1,429.05 198.90 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386439 102915 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 198.90 398848 11/12/2015 101103 GRAINGER 45.07 FLASHLIGHT 00006364 386617 9859085459 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 37.45 ANTIFREEZE 386618 9870004398 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 135.30 LIGHT BULBS 00002288 386262 9874365506 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 20.56 SAFETY GLASSES 00005729 386261 9879342062 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 278.76 GLOVES 00005729 386261 9879342062 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 226.35 PRESSURE GAUGES 00003688 386533 9879543842 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 743.49 398849 11/12/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 531.25 386464 188843 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE YORK SELLING 531.25 398850 11/12/2015 132968 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES INC. 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 386367 4509 OAK DR 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 386368 4509 OAK DR 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 386369 5115 WOODDALE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS GLEN 7,500.00 398851 11/12/2015 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 45.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 386648 110415 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 45.00 398852 11112/2015 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 855.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 386649 110415 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 855.00 398853 11/12/2015 120880 GRUZEBECK, PHYLLIS 76.75 SR. TRIP REFUND 386440 110415 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 76.75 398854 11/12/2015 100788 H&L MESABI 1,296.90 BLANK POLY BLADES 00001966 386402 94236 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398854 11/12/2015 100788 H&L MESABI Continued... 1,296.90 398855 11/12/2015 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 144.00 HOUR METERS 00001970 386507 149783-1 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 144.00 398856 11/12/2015 103884 HANCO CORPORATION 313.62 DIGITAL INFLATORS 00005829 386403 797292 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 313.62 398857 11/12/2015 124733 HARRIS, JOHN 142.54 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386441 102915 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 142.54 398858 11/12/2015 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 99.67 CS REPAIR TOPS 00001916 386338 E688788 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 99.67 398859 11/12/2015 103585 HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING DEPARTMENT 43,845.00 REHAB LOAN PAYBACK 386370 4700 W 70TH ST 2101.4205 FEDERAL AID CDBG REVENUES 43,845.00 398860 11/12/2015 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 197.50 TEMPO EMT - DAVID LINDMAN 386263 41593 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 197.50 398861 11/12/2015 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 386404 41728 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 398862 11/12/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 809.16 OCT 2015 BOOKING FEES 386442 1000066329 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 809.16 398863 11/12/2015 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 165.00 OCT 2015 BUNDLED SERVICE 386443 1000066272 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 165.00 398864 11/12/2015 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 5,000.00 FIREARMS INSTRUCTION 386264 00342055 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398864 11/12/2015 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Continued... 5,000.00 398865 11/12/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 904.21 386465 792842 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,182.00 386466 793238 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 217.00 386467 793239 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 135.00 386468 793333 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,438.21 398866 11/12/2015 133661 HOWARD, JOHN 108.00 MOVIE/EEC FILM SCREENING 386534 02767 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 108.00 398867 11/12/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 1,579.50 386561 34216 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,579.50 398868 11/12/2015 129619 INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY 1,640.34 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 00005142 386406 30485407 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,640.34 398869 11/12/2015 104696 INT'L SECURITY PRODUCTS 158.88 PIPE FOR TODD PK 00001964 386339 3045605 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 158.88 398870 11/12/2015 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 215.66 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386444 103015 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 215.66 398871 11/12/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 23.01 386408 10/15-ELEC 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 29.41 386408 10/15-ELEC 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7.98 386510 10/15-ENG 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION 13.98 386340 10/15-EQUP 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.78 386340 10/15-EQUP 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 78.16 386340 10/15-EQUP 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.49 386266 10/15-FACILITIE 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 602.60 386407 10/15-PARKS 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 14.79 386341 10/15-UTILITY 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 -- Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398871 11/12/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE Continued_ 42.02 386341 10/15-UTILITY 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 54.45 386341 10/15-UTILITY 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 71.98 386341 10/15-UTILITY 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 99.22 386341 10/15-UTILITY 5912.6556 TOOLS WELL HOUSES 46.27 386341 10/15-UTILITY 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,178.14 398872 11/12/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,498.42 386469 2431252 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 92.20 386621 2446000 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,590.62 398873 11/12/2015 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 281.98 LIQUID FERTILIZER 00006303 386622 73565364 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5.56 ELBOWS 00006423 386623 73613916 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 287.54 398874 11/12/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,402.60 386473 5291951 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 352.21 386470 5291954 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 638.12 386471 5291956 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 3,375.74 386474 5291974 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 324.93 386472 5291983 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 76.52 386568 5292441 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 720.74 386570 5297495 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,269.69 386567 5297500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 131.32 386571 5297501 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 130.32 386565 5297503 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 2,437.27 386562 5297506 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 431.89 386566 5297507 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE YORK SELLING 144.00 386569 5297508 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 35.41 386572 5297509 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,548.88 386573 5297510 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 949.13 386564 5297511 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,519.74 386563 5297512 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 416.36 386574 5297513 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8.67- 386578 547618 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 29.62- 386579 547619 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 37.07- 386575 548817 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.22- 386576 548818 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 -- 11/12/2015 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Page - 17 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398874 11/12/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 8.76- 386577 548819 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.33- 386580 549062 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20,780.20 398875 11/12/2016 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 41.37 WEAR SLEEVE 00005833 386409 Y436797 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.37 398876 11/12/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 535.00 GLOCK MAGAZINES 386447 288321 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 173.88 UNIFORMS 00003678 386536 289765 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 708.88 398877 11/12/2015 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1,360.00 50TH/FRANCE CONSTRUCTION 386410 7113160 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 1,360.00 398878 11/12/2015 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 90.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 386650 110415 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 90.00 398879 11/12/2015 137050 KREJCI, SHEILA 5,760.00 MANAGEMENT TRAINING 386342 30 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 5,760.00 398880 11/12/2015 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 185.00 IMPOUND FEE 386511 74657 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 185.00 IMPOUND FEE 386445 74899 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 185.00 IMPOUND FEE 386512 75068 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 185.00 IMPOUND FEE 386513 75076 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 740.00 398881 11/12/2015 137512 LAMB, ANGELINA 85.79 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 386371 5709 HANSEN RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 85.79 398882 11/12/2015 120734 LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY GROUP 240.00 2015 CANINE TRACKER 386411 14901 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 240.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398883 11/12/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 653.65 HANDLE, NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS 00005772 386412 9303647915 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.06 BRACKETS 00005772 386343 9303649212 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 836.26 BULBS, NUTS, BOLTS 00005730 386514 9303659466 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 95.29 SVVITCH 00005755 386651 9303660879 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,622.26 398884 11/12/2015 135267 LDK BUILDERS INC. 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 386670 6701 TRACY AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 386669 7001 WOODDALE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 5,000.00 398885 11/12/2015 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE 20,198.00 OCT 2015 FEES 386624 103115 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 20,198.00 398886 11/12/2015 136027 LINA 4,151.74 NOV 2015 PREMIUM 386671 153056 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 4,151.74 398887 11/12/2015 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 120.72 POST WING PINS 00005828 386344 00056883 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 120.72 398888 11/12/2015 136846 LUCAS, CLAUDETTE 19.14 NUTS, SODA 386652 110515 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 19.14 398889 11/12/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 386.26 WHEEL HUB ASSEMBLY 00005832 386345 2155665 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 386.26 398890 11/12/2015 134842 MARSHALL FARM 252.00 BALES, CORN STALKS, PUMPKINS 386446 110315 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 252.00 398891 11/12/2015 137136 MCALONEY, KAY 63.83 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 386537 110515 1170.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES 63.83 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398892 11/12/2015 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Continued... 39,834.55 OCT 2015 SAC CHARGES 386515 110415 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 39,834.55 398893 11/12/2015 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 385,231.33 DEC 2015 SERVICE 386267 0001049454 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 385,231.33 398894 11/12/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER 99.96 HARD DRIVE, MEMORY CARD 386413 5812173 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 99.96 398895 11/12/2015 127639 MIDWAY FORD 32,467.60 2016 FORD F550 00005180 386538 105672 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 32,467.60 2016 FORD F550 00005182 386539 105673 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 64,935.20 398896 11/12/2015 130628 MIDWEST MECHANICAL SOLUTIONS 828.09 PILOT ASSEMBLY UPGRADE KITS 386414 P8553 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 828.09 398897 11/12/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 1,638.75 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 00001912 386415 35095 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,351.25 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 00001040 386516 35098 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,995.00 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 00001041 386517 35099 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 5,985.00 398898 11/12/2015 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 45.00 RENEWAL APP -JEFFREY BROWN 386626 609 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 45.00 398899 11/12/2016 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 234.21 EXHAUST PIPE, TUBING 00005862 386416 P93873 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 234.21 398900 11/12/2015 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 300.00 COLLECTION SYSTEM TRAINING 00001918 386349 9900040922 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 300.00 398901 11/12/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 117.00 HEALTH EDINA NEWSLETTERS 386653 18750 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398901 11/12/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 105.00 STALKING WARNING FORMS 386268 18934 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 222.00 398902 11/12/2015 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 361.78 WHEEL ASSEMBLIES 00005837 386518 536967F6W 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 361.78 398903 11/12/2015 130266 MUNICODE 313.00 CODE UPDATES 386350 00262133 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 313.00 398904 11/12/2015 127348 NAVIS PACK AND SHIP MN-1094 487.56 FOOTJOY RETURNS 386630 AB678703 5440.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 487.56 398905 11/12/2015 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 51.55 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 386541 110415 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 51.55 398906 11/12/2015 131649 NEOPOST GREAT PLAINS 55.00 MAILING MACHINE TAPES 386631 GPAR44171 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 55.00 398907 11/12/2015 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 161.07 RATCHETASSEMBLY 00001973 386351 569941 1641.6556 TOOLS MOVVING 161.07 398908 11/12/2015 101659 ORKIN 20.00 ACCT 12557616 386353 105489816 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 130.00 ACCT 12557623 386354 105489818 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 20.00 ACCT 12557635 386352 105489820 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 170.00 398909 11/12/2015 137510 ORUM, KEN 102.37 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 386372 413 BLAKE RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 102.37 398910 11/12/2015 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 403.65 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 386373 110215 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 403.65 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398910 398911 11/12/2015 11/12/2015 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 2,416.65 386475 8522199-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,525.33 386476 8522201-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 3,941.98 398912 11/12/2015 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 UTILITY FEES 386448 45205358 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 39.95 398913 11/12/2015 131163 PECK, RANDY 300.00 BREAKFAST WTH SANTA 386449 DEC 5TH 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 300.00 398914 11/12/2015 135849 PETSMART #2412 73.98 K9 FOOD 00003191 386632 T-5026 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 73.98 398915 11/12/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,226.56 386477 2874544 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 324.64 386584 2878244 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 386581 2878247 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 2,482.00 386583 2878249 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 158.07 386585 2878250 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 824.36 386582 2878251 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE YORK SELLING 5,016.79 398916 11/12/2015 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 1,844.05 BRINE ENHANCER 386417 244457 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,844.05 398917 11/12/2015 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 220.00 BLADE SHARPENING 386673 275780 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 220.00 398918 11/12/2015 108540 PROFESSIONAL TURF & RENOVATION 19,000.00 SEEDING 386271 495400 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 19,000.00 398919 11/12/2015 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398919 11/12/2015 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. Continued... 16,460.76 RANGE BALL DISPENSERS 386633 73557 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 16,460.76 398920 11/12/2015 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 1,045.76 CRS2 386418 5180 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,045.76 398921 11/12/2015 137511 REID WALEN, JAYNE 975.00 WINE LICENSE REFUND 386374 BEAUJOS 1400.4131 WINE LICENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 975.00 398922 11/12/2015 106036 REITER, JERRY 221.77 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386450 103015 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 221.77 398923 11/12/2015 137520 REPAIR RITE AUTOMOTIVE 36.82 FUEL 386655 79 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.68 FUEL 386656 94 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.50 398924 11/12/2015 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 26.97 BALL MOUNT 00005859 386355 1927698781 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.97 398925 11/12/2015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 210.72 SOFTENER SALT 00001946 386273 00323457 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 144.48 SOFTENER SALT 00001947 386274 00323458 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 936.00 SOFTENER SALT 386675 00323959 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,291.20 398926 11/12/2015 128282 ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL 1,794.67 CHANGE OF OFFICER REFUND 386676 OLER 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,794.67 398927 11/12/2015 128282 ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL 1,794.67 CHANGE OF OFFICER REFUND 386677 GILBERT 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,794.67 398928 1/12/2015 128282 ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL 1,794.67 CHANGE OF OFFICER REFUND 386678 RIESEN 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398928 11/12/2015 128282 ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL Continued... 1,794.67 398929 11/12/2015 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 117.18 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 386356 R002222481 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.18 398930 11/12/2015 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 605.96 FILTERS 00001878 386420 133413 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,022.78 HVAC FILTERS 00001879 386419 133414 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,628.74 398931 11/12/2016 130921 SCHAEFER, LISA 166.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 386543 110515 1170.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES 166.75 398932 11/12/2015 132076 SCHERBER CO. LLC 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 386376 6224 PARKWOOD 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 386375 6305 KNOLL DR 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 5,000.00 398933 11/12/2015 137518 SCHNEIDER, CARL 1,023.38 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 386544 4513 TOWER ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1,023.38 398934 11/12/2015 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 50th TRASH ROOM CLEANING 386421 53088 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,650.00 398935 11/12/2015 120784 SIGN PRO 185.00 DASHERBOARD 386658 9781 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 185.00 398936 11/12/2015 131543 SIGNCRAFTERS 15,772.39 ENTRANCE SIGN 386634 51826 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 15,772.39 398937 11/12/2015 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 91.12 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIRS 386275 81850256 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 91.12 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398938 11/12/2015 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC Continued... 713.11 HOSE, SPRINKLERS 00006427 386635 73773640 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 713.11 398939 11/12/2015 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 100.00 CLASSROOM ROOM RENTAL 386519 9215 1263.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ENVIRONMENT 100.00 398940 11/12/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 155.24 386482 1341178 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,775.52 386479 1341183 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 2,169.53 386483 1342557 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,571.10 386480 1342559 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 357.93 386588 1343701 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,830.77 386481 1343705 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,473.64 386587 1343706 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,503.53 386484 1343707 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 112.80 386586 1343708 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 21,950.06 398941 11/12/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 210.00 386485 6728 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 210.00 398942 11/12/2015 128371 STEINMETZ, ROBERT 172.19 UNIFORM PURCHASE 386451 102915 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 172.19 398943 11/12/2015 133801 STRUCTURAL IMAGE 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 386547 5904 GRIMES AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 398944 11/12/2015 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 287.82 TIRES 00005830 386357 10135847 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 287.82 398945 11/12/2015 135803 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6,189.20 NOV 2015 PREMIUM 386682 237716-NOV 9900.2033.16 LTD -99 PAYROLL CLEARING 384.40 COBRA 386680 NOV 2015 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 6,573.60 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 — 11/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398946 11/12/2015 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA Continued... 430.68 CONCESSION PRODUCT 386276 511030063 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 430.68 398947 11/12/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1,370.00 386486 928704 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,370.00 398948 11/12/2015 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 397.00 10/6/15 COUNCIL MEETING 386358 M21664 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 166.00 PARK BOARD MEETING 386277 M21691 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 232.00 0/20/15 COUNCIL MEETING 386359 M21692 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 795.00 398949 11/12/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 93.02 TIPS 00005779 386360 10106243 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 93.02 398950 11/12/2015 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 1,509.90 BOILER PUMP 386681 16998 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,509.90 398951 11/12/2015 122302 TOUCHPOINT LOGIC LLC 923.16 COUNCIL CHAMBERS UPGRADE 386423 4085 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 923.16 398952 11/12/2015 128835 TOWN & COUNTRY CLEANING CO. INC. 2,950.00 WASH EXTERIOR WINDOWS 386422 W1015663 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,950.00 398953 11/12/2015 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 5.30 BACKGROUND CHECKS 386452 10515826 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5.30 398954 11/12/2015 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 112.00 OCT 2015 USAGE 386278 269634-11/15 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.00 398955 11/12/2015 136366 TRU NORTH PAINTING INC. 4,903.00 PAINT ROSLAND SHELTERS 386424 16314 1644.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TREES & MAINTENANCE 4,903.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398955 398956 11/12/2015 11/12/2015 136366 TRU NORTH PAINTING INC. 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC Continued... 821.28 AUGER 386425 LC00033652 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 821.28 398957 11/12/2015 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 1,210.27 REPLACE DOORS AND LOCKS 386426 752649 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,210.27 398958 11/12/2015 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 375.00 SEED 00006426 386636 36511 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 375.00 398959 11/12/2015 103048 U.S. BANK 425.00 2013B PAYING AGENT 386379 4114437 5210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 425.00 2013A PAYING AGENT 386378 4114438 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 450.00 2011A PAYING AGENT 386377 4119980 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 1,300.00 398960 11/12/2015 101049 UHL COMPANY INC. 847.00 BOILER REPAIRS 00001800 386427 38812 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 847.00 398961 11/12/2015 100668 URS CORPORATION 16,924.45 PROMENADE - PHASE 4 386522 37648480 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,327.50 CONCEPT DESIGN FOR BRIDGES 00002014 386662 37648735 5760.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 19,251.95 398962 11/12/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 260.99 LIQUOR BAGS 386280 365630-00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 611.62 LIQUOR BAGS 386279 366374-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 872.61 398963 11/12/2015 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 473.97 CLUTCH, BELTS 00006424 386637 1013150004 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 473.97 398964 11/12/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 742.00 CONTROL PANEL 00001806 386523 9762949 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 578.76 HEATERS, SWITCHES 00001864 386428 9801916 47094.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BREDESEN PARK COMFORT STATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398964 398965 11/12/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 103410 W.W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC. Continued... 11/12/2015 1,320.76 2,640.00 PULL PUMP FOR STOR, PAINT PUMP 386281 95278 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 2,640.00 398966 11/12/2015 120816 WEST COAST TRENDS INC. 287.62 GLOVES 386638 40407108 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 287.62 398967 11/12/2015 137516 WILSON, ALLIE 48.53 TRAINING EXPENSES 386453 MEALS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.53 398968 11/12/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 345.86 386488 7053245 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,504.48 386490 7053251 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,117.07 386489 7053252 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 216.00 386593 7053579 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 679.24 386594 7054278 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,033.00 386595 7054347 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,895.65 398969 11/12/2015 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 5,178.19 FUNGICIDE 00006414 386639 60476430 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5,178.19 398970 11/12/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,813.80 386491 1080390746 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 61.43 386492 1080392274 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 698.36 386596 1080393690 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10,151.47 386494 1080393754 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,218.44 386493 1080393755 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.00- 386597 2080108874 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 39.00- 386601 2080108875 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 33.87- 386600 2080108944 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 27.08- 386599 2080108955 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 7.00- 386598 2080108969 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 14,827.55 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 - Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398971 11/12/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued-. 5,712.40 386496 1090485785 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 142.80 386495 1090485786 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,618.56 386497 1090485787 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,066.97 386602 1090486632 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 48.60 386603 1090486633 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12,589.33 398972 11/12/2015 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,377.00 SOUTHDALE AREA TRANS STUDY 386526 1-01686-670 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 11,929.00 VALLEY VIEW RD CONSTR 386527 11-01686-590 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA-377 VALLEY VIEW RD 482.00 VALLEY VIEW PED BRIDGE 386525 4-01686-650 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 3,630.50 FRANCE AVE LANDSCAPING 386528 6-01686-610 01259.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION FRANCE AVE LANDSCAPE PLAN 1,110.00 TRACY AVE PHASE 2 386524 6-01686-640 01399.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TRACY AVE 18,528.50 398973 11/12/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 407.65 51-5634814-2 386282 477040031 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 296.65 51-6046826-0 386286 477048117 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 487.25 51-6229265-9 386284 477052232 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,630.66 51-6229265-9 386284 477052232 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,063.14 51-9251919-0 386287 477083632 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 210.64 51-9337452-8 386285 477090438 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.46 51-0194596-8 386289 477314415 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,090.14 51-6979948-4 386283 477424487 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,400.75 51-6979948-4 386283 477424487 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,837.34 51-6979948-4 386283 477424487 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 446.51 51-9422326-6 386288 477451347 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 25,126.19 51-4888627-1 386362 477558764 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,115.58 51-4888627-1 386362 477558764 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,994.67 51-4966303-6 386454 477562881 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 136.40 51-6137136-8 386361 477576535 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,101.69 51-6840050-6 386640 477751974 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 40,380.72 398974 11/12/2015 132109 YOUNG, SEAN 64.13 BOARDING K9 BLITZ 386641 110615 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 64.13 398975 11/12/2015 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 872.50 386604 16296 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 -- 11/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398975 398976 11/12/2015 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 136276 ARNOTT, JULIE Continued... 11/12/2015 872.50 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386683 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 398977 11/12/2015 135002 BALOGH, MARY 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386684 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 398978 11/1212015 130352 BOREALINO, JOYCE 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 386685 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 398979 11/12/2015 116939 BORGEN, HOLLY 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 386686 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 398980 11/12/2015 104580 BRADBURY, KATHERINE 230.63 ELECTION JUDGE 386687 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 230.63 398981 11/12/2015 106481 BRANDBERG, ZOE ANNE 216.56 ELECTION JUDGE 386688 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 216.56 398982 11/12/2015 121117 BRISCOE, DAVID 143.33 ELECTION JUDGE 386689 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.33 398983 11/12/2015 106485 BURNETT, JAMES H. 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386690 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 398984 11/12/2015 123156 CHRISTIANSEN, MARILYN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 386691 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 398985 11/12/2015 114404 CIPOLLA, JUDY 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 386692 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398985 398986 11/12/2015 114404 CIPOLLA, JUDY 135012 CLARK, SUSAN Continued... 11/12/2015 163.31 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386693 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 398987 11/12/2015 104527 CRACRAFT, JOHN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386694 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 398988 11/12/2015 104528 CRACRAFT, MARIAN 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 386695 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 398989 11/12/2015 104529 CREW, COLLEEN 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386696 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 398990 11/12/2015 104531 DILL, PATRICIA 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386697 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 398991 11/12/2015 130725 EBERLEIN, ERIKA 216.56 ELECTION JUDGE 386698 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 216.56 398992 11/12/2015 104534 FINK, PAUL 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386699 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 398993 11/12/2015 127086 FOSSUM, JOHN 194.06 ELECTION JUDGE 386700 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 194.06 398994 11/12/2015 130726 FULUVAKA, SUZANNE 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386701 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 398995 11/12/2015 123170 GEURTS, VALERIE 225.00 ELECTION JUDGE 386702 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 -- Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 398995 398996 11/1212015 123170 GEURTS, VALERIE 116951 GOLDSTEIN, DEVORAH Continued... 11/12/2015 225.00 216.56 ELECTION JUDGE 386703 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 216.56 398997 11/12/2015 106566 HAMAN, EUGENE E. 208.13 ELECTION JUDGE 386704 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 208.13 398998 11/12/2015 120269 HANSEN, BRIAN 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 386706 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 398999 11/12/2015 117134 HANSEN, JUDITH 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386705 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 399000 11/12/2015 120244 HASNUDEEN, BUDDY 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 386707 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 399001 11/12/2015 123503 HATZUNG, LISA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386708 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 399002 11/12/2015 106576 HELEY, CHERYL 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 386709 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 196.88 399003 11/12/2015 117139 HOPPE, JUDY 191.25 ELECTION JUDGE 386710 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 191.25 399004 11/12/2015 105397 HYKES, MYRA 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386711 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 213.75 399005 11/12/2015 134683 JOHNSON, GRANT 213.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386712 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Page - 32 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 — 11/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Account No 399005 399006 11/12/2015 134683 JOHNSON, GRANT 106608 KACHAN, MARY K. Continued_ 11/12/2015 213.75 143.81 ELECTION JUDGE 386713 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.81 399007 11/12/2015 106538 KAPAUN, ANN 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386714 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 399008 11/12/2015 106539 KEENAN, ANN 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386715 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 399009 11/12/2015 130763 KEINER, JOAN 143.33 ELECTION JUDGE 386716 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 143.33 399010 11/12/2015 106540 KINGSTON, JESSICA 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386717 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 399011 11/12/2015 106541 KLEFSAAS, MAVIS 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 386718 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 399012 11/12/2015 131110 KNUTSON, MARY 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 386719 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 399013 11/12/2015 130764 KOUDSI, HANA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386720 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 399014 11/12/2015 134685 LABONNE, JUDY 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 386721 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 399015 11/12/2015 106550 LANDBERG, MARY 210.94 ELECTION JUDGE 386722 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/6/2015 — Inv No 11/12/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399015 399016 11/1212015 106550 LANDBERG, MARY 127437 LAPPIN, GERTRUDE Continued... 11/12/2015 210.94 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386723 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 399017 11/12/2015 135068 LAZARETTI, DELORES 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386724 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 399018 11/12/2015 135070 LEHNHOFF, DONALD 151.13 ELECTION JUDGE 386725 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 151.13 399019 11/12/2015 135073 LITMAN, MITZI 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386726 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 399020 11/12/2015 127089 LOVELAND, CYNTHIA 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 386727 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 399021 11/12/2015 108574 MAETZOLD, LINDA 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 386728 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 399022 11/12/2015 120250 MENZEL, MARVIN 177.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386729 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 177.19 399023 11/12/2015 116961 MILLER, NANCY 222.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386730 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 222.19 399024 11/12/2015 135101 MORROW, COOPER 162.83 ELECTION JUDGE 386731 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 162.83 399025 11/12/2015 120393 NAZARIAN, BARBARA 167.70 ELECTION JUDGE 386732 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary R55CKR2 LOGIS101 11/6/2015 — 11/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399025 399026 11/12/2015 120393 NAZARIAN, BARBARA 106619 NIEFELD, SUSAN Continued.- 11/12/2015 167.70 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386733 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 399027 11/12/2015 135106 NYE, DANIEL 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386734 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 399028 11/12/2015 104616 OLANDER, PATRICIA 227.81 ELECTION JUDGE 386735 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 227.81 399029 11/12/2015 120254 O'NEILL, ORDELL 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386736 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 399030 11/12/2015 123195 PEARCE, WAIN 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386737 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 399031 11/12/2015 134688 PFANNENSTEIN, RONALD 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386738 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 399032 11/12/2015 119667 RAZIDLO, TERESA 168.19 ELECTION JUDGE 386739 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 168.19 399033 11/12/2015 106275 RODGERS, JUDITH 171.56 ELECTION JUDGE 386740 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 171.56 399034 11/12/2015 127081 RODGERS, WILLIAM 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386741 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 399035 11/12/2015 130771 ROSENTHAL-ERICKSON, LUANN 188.44 ELECTION JUDGE 386742 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 35 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 -- 11/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399035 399036 11/12/2016 130771 ROSENTHAL-ERICKSON, LUANN 130772 ROTHE, CAROL Continued... 11/12/2015 188.44 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386743 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 399037 11/12/2015 116970 SCHWIEBERT, SARA 24.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386744 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 24.38 399038 11/12/2015 133176 SMITH, DEL 188.44 ELECTION JUDGE 386746 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 188.44 399039 11/12/2015 135082 SMITH, JUDY 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 386747 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 399040 11/12/2015 106609 SMITH, RUTH L 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386745 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 399041 11/12/2015 135084 SPECKHALS DUANE, LYNN 117.00 ELECTION JUDGE 386748 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 117.00 399042 11/12/2015 134691 STANTON, MARY 141.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386749 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 141.38 399043 11/12/2015 131137 STONE, JAN 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 386750 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 399044 11/12/2015 123210 SWEET, PHILOTHEA 160.88 ELECTION JUDGE 386751 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 160.88 399045 11/12/2015 116976 TIGGAS, ANDREA 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 386752 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Page - 36 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 -- 11/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Account No 399045 399046 11/12/2015 11/12/2015 116976 TIGGAS, ANDREA 130776 WALLANDER, DONNA Continued... 196.88 163.31 ELECTION JUDGE 386753 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 163.31 399047 11/12/2015 106638 WASHBURN, VIRGINIA 188.44 ELECTION JUDGE 386754 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 188.44 399048 11/12/2015 123212 WEHRMEISTER, PAUL 146.25 ELECTION JUDGE 386755 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 146.25 399049 11/12/2015 108598 WELBAUM, MIKE 165.75 ELECTION JUDGE 386756 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 165.75 399050 11/12/2015 130777 WENGER, WAYNE 219.38 ELECTION JUDGE 386757 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 219.38 399051 11/12/2015 135096 WILLIAMS, AMANDA 131.63 ELECTION JUDGE 386759 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 131.63 399052 11/12/2015 116983 WILLIAMS, PATRICIA 170.63 ELECTION JUDGE 386758 101615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 170.63 399053 11/12/2015 108599 WINN, KITTY 92.63 ELECTION JUDGE 386760 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 92.63 399054 11/12/2015 111696 ZVERINOVA, MARGARET 196.88 ELECTION JUDGE 386761 110615 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 196.88 1,159,926.25 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,108,684.97 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 37 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/6/2015 — 11/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,159,926.25 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,108,684.97 A/P ACH Payment 51,241.28 Total Payments 1,159,926.25 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 11/9/2015 11:54:18 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 11/6/2015 - 11/12/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 211,347.83 02100 CDBG FUND 43,845.00 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 740.00 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 482.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 875.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 135,091.29 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 38,701.76 04500 CANDO FUND 1,152.76 05100 ART CENTER FUND 294.19 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 4,040.98 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 2,640.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 48,844.91 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 39,561.69 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 1,115.58 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 13,035.86 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,439.26 05800 LIQUOR FUND 119,742.35 05900 UTILITY FUND 443,852.76 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 7,542.68 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 7,637.44 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,300.52 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 18,301.45 09900 PAYROLL FUND 10,340.94 Report Totals 1,159,926.25 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date "7" 2-/f R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 1 Business Unit 2261 11/19/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 150.80 386762 1948106 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 84.80 387129 1949380 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 31.20 387130 1949382 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 266.80 2262 11/19/2015 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 110.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 387204 141469 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 110.00 2263 11/19/2015 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 906.19 SHELVING AND COAT HOOKS 387208 44-121 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 906.19 2264 11/19/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION .78 386770 50766600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 364.65 386773 50871300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 414.10 386771 50871400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 292.65 386772 50871600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 707.25 387135 50967800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 323.10 387134 50967900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.55 387133 50968100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 96.55 387132 50968200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 576.26 386777 6605700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 419.59 386776 6607900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 75.00 386778 92925800 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 86.79 386775 92935800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 207.45 386774 92970700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 124.06 386779 92970800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 98.95 387136 92999200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,823.73 2265 11/19/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 131.75 METAL BOOKCASE 386986 WO-155749-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 131.75 2266 11/19/2015 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 20,358.78 COBRA 387093 LOGI 0-DEC 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 220,576.10 DEC 2015 PREMIUMS 387093 LOG10-DEC 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 240,934.88 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 2 Business Unit 2267 11/19/2015 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS Continued... 182.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003689 386988 113201 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 49.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 386954 113238 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 200.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003692 386989 113283 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 23.37 BINDERS 00003692 386990 1132831.1 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 455.85 2268 11/19/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 18.72 LAMPS 387210 1007565 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.72 2269 11/19/2015 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 18,306.90 GEOTHERMAL REPAIRS 386957 G000325 450004.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW GEOTHERMAL REPAIRS 18,306.90 2270 11/19/2015 102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC. 98.26 SURFACE WARRANTY 00004386 386931 BBB0351 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 147.90 SURFACE WARRANTY 00004388 386933 BBB2212 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 124.70 TYPE COVER FOR SP4 00004388 386935 BCB3821 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,041.46 PROJECTOR 00004393 386934 BCK1419 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 868.56 SURFACE TEST DEVICE 00004386 386930 ZX18650 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,280.92 SURFACE PRO 00004388 386932 ZX18907 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,561.80 2271 11/19/2015 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 300.37- CREDITACCT 707-5686 387102 7070218468 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 990.00 CLEAN RAMP STAIRWELLS 386958 7070219118 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 901.11 CLEANING SERVICES 387101 7070219289 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,590.74 2272 11/19/2015 104020 DALCO 1,878.14 ICE MELTER 00001011 386959 2952825 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 1,878.14 2273 11/19/2015 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,572.00 OCT 2015 BILLS 386874 2411 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,572.00 2274 11/19/2015 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 153.53 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 387230 111315 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 153.53 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2274 2275 11/19/2015 11/19/2015 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS Continued... 201.83 THERMAL ROLLS 00007516 386883 137528 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 201.83 2276 11/19/2015 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 243.75 VFD MAINTENANCE 00001048 386965 7599 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 243.75 2277 11/19/2015 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 750.00 EDINET - OCT 387004 JJ5676 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 825.00 WEBSITE - OCT 387005 OCT 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,575.00 2278 11/19/2015 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 324.00 BRAEMAR NOTE CARDS 387110 669181 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 246.00 ENVELOPES 387109 669182 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 570.00 2279 11/19/2015 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 60.56 TOILET RENTAL 387111 96715 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 60.56 2280 11/19/2015 101792 LUBE-TECH 50.00 RECYCLE USED OIL 387235 708558 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.00 2281 11/19/2015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 3,725.03 387053 206352 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,725.03 2282 11/19/2015 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER 1,800.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT ASSESSMENTS 387008 10066 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 450.00 387009 10067 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 2,250.00 2283 11/19/2015 101483 MENARDS 49.99 PLATE 00005693 387237 96791 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.37 LUMBER, CAUTION TAPE 00001870 386969 97814 1365.6520 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE 32.44 PAIL, MORTAR 00001957 386970 98403 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015— 11/19/2015 Page - 4 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2283 11/19/2015 101483 MENARDS Continued.., 144.00 FURRING STRIPS 00001962 386891 98433 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 25.69 BATTERIES, FASTENERS 00001007 386890 99428 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 29.88 ANTIFREEZE 00006433 387012 99455 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 439.37 2284 11/19/2015 100898 MINVALCO 120.40 VALVE BODY 00001671 387285 010314 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 120.40 2285 11/19/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,026.27 WINDOW GLASS KIT 00005776 387241 1041794-00 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,026.27 2286 11/19/2015 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 84.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 387244 N1A8607 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 84.00 2287 11/19/2015 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 430.50 GALVANIZED PIPE 00001985 386895 333222 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 430.50 2288 11/19/2015 130141 OENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 135.00 386818 4048 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 135.00 2289 11/19/2015 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 113.60 FURNACE REPAIR 387018 64844 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 113.60 2290 11/19/2015 129485 PAPCO INC. 391.06 SOAP, TOWELS, TISSUE 387286 95650 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 391.06 2291 11/19/2015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,029.40 TIRES 00005715 387248 210198089 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,010.88 TIRES 00005715 387249 210202402 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,040.28 2292 11/19/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 342.95 TISSUE, GLOVES, LINERS 00002284 387253 8599 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 5 Business Unit 2292 11/19/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Continued... 344.40 TOWELS, LINERS 00002293 387252 8607 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 687.35 2293 11/19/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 158.50 BUSINESS CARDS 387022 88364 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 58.50 BUSINESS CARDS 387021 88418 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 217.00 2294 11/19/2015 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 143.00 SLEEVE IMPELLER 00001972 386976 29456 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 143.00 2295 11/19/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 156.50 387072 0134269-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 132.00 386838 0136527-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 548.00 386839 0137070-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 200.88 387182 0137624-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,037.38 2296 11/19/2015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 820.62 CONCESSION PRODUCT 386913 43930809 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 10.17- CREDIT 386914 43992520 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 564.03 CONCESSION PRODUCT 387262 43994377 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 30.64 CONCESSION PRODUCT 387261 43994401 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,405.12 2297 11/19/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 652.25 386840 408483-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,503.10 386841 408673-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,382.47 387073 409341-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 155.65 387183 409346-00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 841.65 387074 409348-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,535.12 399055 11/19/2015 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 355.00 SAFE DRIVING CLASSES 387090 NOV 12 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 355.00 399056 11/19/2015 135278 AAS, ANN 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 387190 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2016- 11/19/2015 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399056 11/19/2015 135278 AAS, ANN Continued... 13.00 399057 11/19/2015 129458 ACME TOOLS 109.00 BLADE SHARPENING 386859 3664325 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 150.98 TOOLS 00001803 386860 3679277 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 239.99 IMPACT WRENCH 386919 3694957 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 239.99- RETURN 386920 3695160 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 259.98 399058 11/19/2015 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 118.00- CREDIT 387271 300018462 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 582.74 MERCHANDISE 387270 901449406 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,820.61 GOLF BALLS 387269 901449573 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 58.06- 900298770F 387272 FREIGHT CREDITS 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 10.74- 900359388F 387272 FREIGHT CREDITS 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6.17- 900070238F 387272 FREIGHT CREDITS 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2.96- 900279264F 387272 FREIGHT CREDITS 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,207.42 399059 11/19/2015 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 727.00 ANNUAL COMPRESSOR SERVICING 386984 28495 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 727.00 399060 11/19/2015 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 593.00 EARPIECES 00003684 386985 56587 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 593.00 399061 11/19/2015 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 125.00 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 387205 74204 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 125.00 399062 11/19/2015 137537 ARCHIE'S LOCK AND SAFE 465.00 INTERCOM REPAIR 387206 14260 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 465.00 399063 11/19/2015 105748 ARIZONA MFG. & EMBROIDERY INC, 226.40 PUTTER COVERS 387091 00604271 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 226.40 399064 11/19/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015— 11/19/2015 No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 7 Business Unit 399064 11/19/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 133.50 386763 3064844 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,501.45 386765 3064846 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,910.50 386764 3064848 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 894.20 387131 3066206 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8.00- 386767 327007 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 15.68- 386766 327009 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 42.00- 386768 327652 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,373.97 399065 11/19/2015 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 271.11 ACCT 1-14635 4 387273 110115 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 271.11 399066 11/19/2015 137529 BARBER, BARBARA 58.58 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 387207 111115 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 70.10 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 387207 111115 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 128.68 399067 11/19/2015 104345 BARCLAY AUDIO 1,030.00 SOUND SYSTEM REPAIRS 387092 CENT LKS PK 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,030.00 399068 11/19/2015 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 229.00 386769 4262 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 229.00 399069 11/19/2015 121602 BEAUPRE AERIAL EQUIPMENT 1,019.11 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 386861 7586-1 5552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 1,019.11 399070 11/19/2015 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 860.00 NOV 2015 SNOW REMOVAL 387274 145666 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 860.00 399071 11/19/2015 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 14.30 ART WORK SOLD 387191 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.30 399072 11/19/2015 125227 BERGUM, MOLLY 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 387192 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399072 11/19/2015 125227 BERGUM, MOLLY Continued... 22.75 399073 11/19/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 216.00 PIZZA 387209 D2813817 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 216.00 399074 11/19/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 300.30 386862 257492 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 353.20 387042 259187 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 525.10 387043 259188 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,178.60 399076 11/19/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 126.95 COFFEE 386953 T80839 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 126.95 399076 11/19/2015 136871 BLACKLIST BEER LLC 430.00 386780 1151028846 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 430.00 399077 11/19/2015 120510 BLOOMINGTON CUSTOM EMBROIDERY 562.40 EXPLORER UNIFORMS 386987 36931 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 562.40 399078 11/19/2015 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 378.00 MOTION LIGHTS 00001003 386955 910273402 47094.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BREDESEN PARK COMFORT STATION 614.49 WIRE FOR UNDERGROUND 00001004 386956 910273404 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 992.49 399079 11/19/2015 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 714.41 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003626 386991 81931018 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 37.36 00003628 386992 81956230 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 225.45 00003630 386993 81956231 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 977.22 399080 11/19/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 621.50 386781 129922 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 594.50 386782 129927 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 382.00 387137 130061 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,598.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399080 399081 11/19/2015 11/19/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. Continued... 469.88 GOLF BALLS 387097 1002434396 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 105.16 MN VIKINGS CAPS 387094 1002434651 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 105.16 MN VVILD CAPS 387095 1002434652 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 66.14 BEANIE CAPS 387096 1002434653 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 216.00 GOLF BALLS 387098 1002435126 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 962.34 399082 11/19/2015 122195 BRUNSWICK ZONE - EDEN PRAIRIE 62.40 EDINA JUNIORS BOWLING 387099 1839609 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 67.60 387100 1839610 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 130.00 399083 11/19/2015 135200 BRYANT, REX 75.00 SKATE WITH SANTA 387211 DEC 19 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 75.00 399084 11/19/2015 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR 260.00 SCORE KEEPERS 387212 1 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 260.00 399085 11/19/2015 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 387193 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 399086 11/19/2015 100826 CANTON, JANET 22.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 386863 110915 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 22.20 399087 11/19/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 6,282.52 386783 734258 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,711.30 387138 739937 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,935.55 387044 740814 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,929.37 399088 11/19/2015 137524 CAPRI BIG BAND 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 12/13/15 386928 110115 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015-- 11/19/2015 Page - 10 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399089 11/19/2015 137138 CASTLE DANGER BREWING CO LLC Continued... 506.44 387045 4179 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 506.44 399090 11/19/2015 132405 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 86.24 PERMIT ED141080 REFUND 387213 6940 VALLEY VEW 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS RD 86.24 399091 11/19/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 98.91 612 E77-0056 386995 0056-11/15 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 62.48 386868 0146-10/15 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 172.13 386868 0146-10/15 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 174.31 386868 0146-10/15 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 314.22 386868 0146-10/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 302.55 386868 0146-10/15 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 58.77 386868 0146-10/15 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 38.28 386868 0146-10/15 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 590.03 612 E01-0426 386866 0426-11/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 104.90 612 E23-0652 386994 0652-11/15 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 60.59 952 835-1161 386864 1161-11/15 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 213.59 952 835-6661 386865 6661-11/15 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 590.03 612 E12-6797 386867 6797-11/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,780.79 399092 11/19/2015 101264 CHET'S SAFEY SALES INC. 163.99 SAFETY BOOTS 386869 32027 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 163.99 399093 11/19/2015 129826 CITIZENS LEAGUE 2,500.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 386996 2015 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 2,500.00 399094 11/19/2015 118580 CITY OF EDINA 500.00 COMPLIANCE FINE 387275 15003205 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 500.00 399095 11/19/2015 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 PHONE/INTERNET MAINT 387276 COM-0725 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015-- 11/19/2015 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 11 Business Unit 399096 11/19/2015 131038 CITY OF EDINA - SENIOR CENTER Continued... 1,200.00 ROOM 109 RENTAL 387214 110115 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,200.00 399097 11/19/2015 121616 COATES ROOFING INC. 250.00 ROOF REPAIRS 387215 15139 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 250.00 399098 11/19/2015 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 385.92 387046 0138038018 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 385.92 399099 11/19/2015 137068 COLEBECK, LOYOLA 66.00 MODEL 387216 10/30/15 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 360.00 MODEL 387217 111315 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 426.00 399100 11/19/2015 120433 COMCAST 28.94 8772 10 614 0220686 387218 220686-11/15 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 24.78 8772 10 614 0023973 386998 23973-10/15 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 24.78 8772 10 614 0023973 386997 23973-11/15 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 83.84 8772 10 614 0540232 387277 540232-11/15 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 162.34 399101 11/19/2015 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 1,291.20 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 387219 103015 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,291.22 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 387219 103015 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,291.22 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 387219 103015 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 3,873.64 399102 11/19/2015 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD 60.00 MODEL 387220 111315 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00 399103 11/19/2015 101495 CREATIVE IMAGES ON RIBBON INC. 612.43 SKATING CLASS RIBBONS 00008014 386870 9574 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 612.43 399104 11/19/2015 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 5,842.68 BIRTHDAY T-SHIRTS 387221 42310 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5,842.68 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015— 11/19/2015 Page - 12 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399104 11/19/2015 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES Continued.. 399105 11/19/2015 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 20.48 114-09855685-4 387278 10/2015 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 241.50 114-10014090-3 386936 103115 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 261.98 399106 11/19/2015 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 2.60 ART WORK SOLD 364130 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 23.24 ART WORK SOLD 387194 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.84 399107 11/19/2015 137531 DA PROPERTIES HOLDING LLC 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 387222 5816 ABBOTT AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 399108 11/19/2015 134916 DAILEY HOMES INC. 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 387223 6712 WEST SHORE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS DR 2,500.00 399109 11/19/2015 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 5.85 ART WORK SOLD 387195 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5.85 399110 11/19/2015 133298 DELGEHAUSEN, JOSEPH 74.57 TRAINING EXPENSES 387224 MEALS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 74.57 399111 11/19/2015 103013 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 20.00 BUYERS CARD FEE 386937 1555,6504,1412 5820.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 50TH STREET GENERAL 20.00 BUYERS CARD FEE 386937 1555,6504,1412 5840.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20.00 BUYERS CARD FEE 386937 1555,6504,1412 5860.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 20.00 BUYERS CARD FEE 386938 15951 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 80.00 399112 11/19/2015 129080 DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC. 3,082.45 CAR WASH AND WAX 00005788 387225 IN-1382768 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,082.45 399113 11/19/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 13 Business Unit 399113 11/19/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. Continued... 173.14 PUBLISH ORD 2015-22 386871 273005 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,373.91 PUBLISH ORD 2015-20 386873 273006 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 335.10 PUBLISH ORD 2015-20 386872 273007 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 921.80 EDINA LIQUOR INSERT 387226 274060 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 921.81 EDINA LIQUOR INSERT 387226 274060 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 921.81 EDINA LIQUOR INSERT 387226 274060 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 4,647.57 399114 11/19/2015 103069 EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 500.00 MINNEHAHA MUSIC 387227 111105 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA 500.00 399115 11/19/2015 134966 EMSAR MIDWEST 1,680.91 COT MAINTENANCE 386999 SI-15157 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,680.91 399116 11/19/2015 137540 EMSL ANALYTICAL INC. 40.95 LEAD ABATEMENT 387279 35092265 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 40.95 399117 11/19/2015 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 69.80 387047 268-1574 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 69.80 399118 11/19/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 21.05 HALOGEN CAPSULES 387228 69-200893 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.44 TIRE SENSOR 387229 69-201024 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.49 399119 11/19/2015 122549 FARNER-BOCKEN COMPANY 893.50 CONCESSION PRODUCT 386875 4370871 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 893.50 399120 11/19/2015 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 22.27 LIFT STATION HARDWARE 00001984 386876 MNTC2133667 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 22.27 399121 11/19/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 329.72 HYDRANT PARTS 00001042 386877 0170712 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 269.93 HYDRANT PARTS 00001046 356878 0171412 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015— Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399121 11/19/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS Continued... 599.65 399122 11/19/2015 131188 FIRST-SHRED 504.50 DOCUMENT SHREDDING 386879 164321 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 504.50 399123 11/19/2016 134486 FLINT TRADING INC. 2,073.37 PAVEMENT MARKINGS 00001838 386961 189591 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 769.57 PAVEMENT MARKINGS 00001927 386960 189937 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2,842.94 399124 11/19/2015 126725 FORTNER, NOLA 1.95 ART WORK SOLD 387196 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1.95 399125 11/19/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 ACCT 0012939 387000 1006387118 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 57.50 ACCT 0039263 387103 1013385630 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 72.50 399126 11/19/2015 101662 GCSAA 375.00 DUES - TOM SWENSON 387001 528978 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 375.00 399127 11/19/2015 135205 GEIGER, ALEXANDRA 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 386921 110915 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 399128 11/19/2015 134005 GEOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 1,000.00 GIS UPDATES TRAINING 386939 G20-11821 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,000.00 399129 11/19/2015 134852 GL SPORTS CAMPS LLC 5,923.92 SKYHAWKS PROGRAMS 386880 20603 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP 5,923.92 399130 11/19/2015 125935 GOLF SCORECARDS INC. 303.19 SCORECARDS 387104 41341 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 303.19 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015— 11/19/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 15 Business Unit 399131 11/19/2015 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 33.89 RATCHET REPAIR KIT, CUP HOLDER00005789 386962 9885359407 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.87 SAFETY GLASSES 387280 9888401370 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 96.76 399132 11/19/2015 120201 GRANICUS INC. 3,270.00 WEBSTREAMING 10-12 387002 70107 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 3,270.00 399133 11/19/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 837.00 387139 189237 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 837.00 399134 11/19/2015 137522 GRIHAM, AVERY 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 386922 110915 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 399135 11/19/2015 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 454.80 FAN MOTOR 00001868 386881 HD00127599 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 454.80 399136 11/19/2015 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC, 283.90 387105 103115 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 616.00 387105 103115 1301.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE 102.32 387105 103115 5765,6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 1,002.22 399137 11/19/2015 100790 HACH COMPANY 68.94 TESTING CHEMICALS 00001047 386882 9654255 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 68.94 399138 11/19/2015 137535 HAMLINE MENS HOCKEY 1,750.00 DOME LABOR 387231 111315 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,750.00 399139 11/19/2015 133195 HANRAHAN, LIAM 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 386923 110915 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 399140 11/19/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,203.75 CHEMICALS 00005285 386963 3796338 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015— Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399140 11/19/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. Continued-. 2,203.75 399141 11/19/2015 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 1,052.45 COBRA 387107 62275266 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 12,098.44 DEC 2015 PREMIUMS 387106 62276074 1556.6040 HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 13,150.89 399142 11/19/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,192.38 OCT ROOM & BOARD 387108 1000066826 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 1,192.38 399143 11/19/2015 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 165.00 BUNDLED SERVICE 386884 1000066271 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,352.35 OCT 2015 RADIO FEES 386941 1000066652 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,447.81 OCT 2015 RADIO FEES 386940 1000066653 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,965.16 399144 11/19/2015 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 2,059.90 CHAIRS FOR CITY HALL 386964 576577 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,059.90 399145 11/19/2015 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 18.81 SPEAKER BAR 00004379 386942 56561123 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 18.81 399146 11/19/2015 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 257.31 SANITIZER, FOAM SOAP 00002296 387232 601842118 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 257.31 399147 11/19/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,609.50 386784 793041 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 752.00 386785 793240 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,241.00 387048 794090 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 595.92 387140 794184 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,040.75 387049 794446 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,239.17 399148 11/19/2015 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 12.71 ART WORK SOLD 387197 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.71 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015-- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399148 399149 11/19/2015 11/19/2015 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN Continued... 86.33 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 387003 MEALS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 86.33 399150 11/19/2015 100812 IAAO 920.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 387292 111615 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 920.00 399151 11/19/2015 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 328.30 PARTS 386885 103115 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 328.30 399152 11/19/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 795.00 386786 34215 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 285.50 387050 34251 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 490.50 387051 34402 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,571.00 399153 11/19/2015 131794 INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2,200.00 LEAD EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 387281 00016693 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE 2,200.00 399154 11/19/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 8.79 386966 10/15-STREETS 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 13.59 386966 10/15-STREETS 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 16.62 386966 10/15-STREETS 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 16.87 386966 10/15-STREETS 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 26.05 386966 10/15-STREETS 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 29.56 386966 10/15-STREETS 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 34.97 386966 10/15-STREETS 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 41.91 386966 10/15-STREETS 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 98.75 386966 10/15-STREETS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 649.04 386966 10/15-STREETS 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 72.76 386966 10/15-STREETS 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,008.91 399155 11/19/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 320.00 387052 2417895 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,486.39 386790 2431288 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 18 Business Unit 399155 11/19/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 1,768.10 386794 2431289 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 386795 2431291 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 49.20 386789 2431292 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 21.50 386791 2431293 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,119.09 386793 2431296 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 77.85 386792 2431297 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 266.50 386787 2431298 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 228.60 386788 2431310 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,505.10 387143 2431320 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 38.80 387144 2431321 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 7,762.31 387141 2431328 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 39.05 387142 2431329 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 25,703.99 399156 11/19/2015 137539 JOHANSEN, KRISTINE 123.00 ART CLASS REFUND 387282 CLAY CLASS 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 123.00 399157 11/19/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,688.00 386811 5290925 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 217.77 386812 5293432 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.54 386808 5297494 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,081.16 01081.16 386804 5297496 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,292.76 386801 5297497 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,231.68 386805 5297498 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 408.44 386806 5297499 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.27 386798 5297502 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 763.44 386807 5297504 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8,032.22 386809 5297516 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,518.33 386800 5297517 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,212.76 386796 5297518 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3.48 386802 5297519 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,670.00 386797 5297520 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,236.52 386810 5297521 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 717.68 386799 5297522 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 464.71 386803 5297523 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 280.48 387146 5302506 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 290.49 387145 5302509 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,851.21 387147 5302510 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 387157 5302511 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 19 Business Unit 399157 11/19/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1.45 387154 5302512 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,060.52 387155 5302517 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,867.69 387150 5302518 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 791.77 387153 5302519 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 50.32 387151 5302520 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,180.27 387149 5302521 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 550.50 387152 5302522 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,552.98 387148 5302523 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,430.83 387161 5302528 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,152.57 387160 5302529 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,649.42 387162 5302530 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,170.74 387159 5302531 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,424.18 387158 5302532 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,291.05 387156 5302533 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,646.59 387163 5302534 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 206.37 387164 5302535 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 31.16- 386816 546412 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 44.79- 386815 547626 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12.41- 386814 549063 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 366.32- 386813 550147 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \MNE VERNON SELLING 77.68- 387165 550936 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 60,530.99 399158 11/19/2015 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 199.00 MAKE UP AIR UNIT 00001995 386886 1022059 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 199.00 399159 11/19/2015 103230 JOHNSTON'S SALES & SERVICE 199.43 VACUUM REPAIR 387112 10806 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 42.64 VACUUM BAGS 387113 10823 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 242.07 399160 11/19/2015 130789 KATZ, DAVID 90.00 HOMETOWN HERO 387006 619 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 84.00 LIVING STREETS CHAMPION 387006 619 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 174.00 399161 11/19/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 81.99 UNIFORMS 00003675 387007 288817-02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.99 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015— Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399161 399162 11/19/2015 11/19/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 136329 KERN COMPANY LLC Continued... 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 387233 4015 WOOD END 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS DR 2,500.00 399163 11/19/2015 137525 KERNS, JOHN 150.00 12/17/15 CHILDRENS PERFORMANCE 387114 111015 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 399164 11/19/2015 137523 KLINE, KATIE 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 386924 110915 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 399165 11/19/2015 116776 KUSTOM }CARRIERS 170.00 IMPOUND FEE 386887 73166 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 170.00 399166 11/19/2015 137011 LANDSCAPES UNLIMITED LLC 406,183.05 GOLF COURSE RENOVATION 387293 4 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 406,183.05 399167 11/19/2015 137541 LANGE, DIANA 89.00 COURSE REFUND 387283 110315 7414.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 89.00 399168 11/19/2015 136231 LARSON, DEB 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 386888 103015 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 386888 103015 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 386888 103015 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,100.00 399169 11/19/2015 121656 LAVEN, JANE 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 387198 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.75 399170 11/19/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 190.61 HAND CLEANER 00005731 386967 9303657672 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 241.54 LAMP KITS 00005727 386968 9303667127 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 578.49 NUTS, BOLTS, BITS 00005864 387234 9303675045 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015— Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399170 11/19/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 1,010.64 399171 11/19/2015 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 356.50 386817 2113 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 356.50 399172 11/19/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 354.52 WHEEL HUB ASSEMBLY 00005839 386889 2160102 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 354.52 399173 11/19/2015 102241 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IMPORTS INC. 593.50 387054 20018968 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 593.50 399174 11/19/2015 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 369.70 OXYGEN 387010 12327039 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 369.70 399175 11/19/2015 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 166.20 RECORDER ATTACHMENTS 387011 81117 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 166.20 399176 11/19/2015 137530 MEINEKE, WAYNE 100.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 387236 5409 GROVE ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 100.00 399177 11/19/2015 132441 METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY SERVICES BOARD 817.35 E911 SERVICES 387013 20009753 2310.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES E911 817.35 399178 11/19/2015 137521 MICHELS CORP. 1,440.00 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 386892 WHITING & 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES RIDGEVIEW 1,440.00 399179 11/19/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER 47.31 PW CAMERA TRUCK SUPPLIES 00004390 386943 5818076 4614.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asset Mgmt Software and Equip 23.66 PW CAMERA TRUCK SUPPLIES 00004390 386943 5818076 4615.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Asst Mgmt SW & Equip - Storm 70.97 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015— 11/19/2015 Page - 22 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399180 11/19/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER Continued... 150.00 TELEVISED SEWER LINE 386971 35090 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES-SEWER 150.00 399181 11/19/2015 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 44.56 OXYGEN 387284 171139478 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 44.56 399182 11/19/2015 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAND 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 12/5/15 386925 110115 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 399183 11/19/2015 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.36 WINDOW CLEANING 387014 928045274 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5.36 399184 11/19/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 167.00 POSTCARDS 386893 18951 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 44.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTERS 387015 19043 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 357.00 POSTCARDS 387238 19084 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 568.00 399185 11/19/2015 137040 MITCHELL, MEGAN 32.50 ART WORK SOLD 387239 111215 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 32.50 399186 11/19/2015 137536 MN MAGICIANS HOCKEY CLUB 2,800.00 DOME LABOR 387240 111315 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 2,800.00 399187 11/19/2016 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 806.00 OFFICIATING FEES 386894 110615 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 806.00 399188 11/19/2015 114343 MULLEN, JANET 11.70 ART WORK SOLD 387199 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 11.70 399189 11/19/2015 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 1,148.35 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 387016 114564 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 1,148.35 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015-- 11/19/2015 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399189 399190 11/19/2015 11/19/2015 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. Continued... 746.33 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 387242 APR-SEPT 2015 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 746.33 399191 11/19/2015 100763 NEOPOST USA INC 228.79 POSTAGE MACHINE MAINTENANCE 386944 53371249 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 228.79 399192 11/19/2015 131449 NEUTGENS EXCAVATING 290.00 HYDRANT METER REFUND 387243 5309 HALIFAX 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 290.00 399193 11/19/2015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 328.50 387055 104847 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 328.50 399194 11/19/2015 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 119.82 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003629 387017 901675863 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.82 399195 11/19/2015 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 94.23 BULBS 00005858 387245 39947 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.23 399196 11/19/2015 123956 OAKS PROPERTIES LLC 138.71 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 387246 5104 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CIR 138.71 399197 11/19/2015 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 60.95 COLD GALVANIZE SPRAY 00001045 386896 570453 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 60.95 399198 11/19/2015 137532 ON TIME CONTRACTORS INC. 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 387247 5841 ABBOTT AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 399199 11/19/2015 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 4.23 ART WORK SOLD 387200 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399199 11/19/2015 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN Continued... 4.23 399200 11/19/2015 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 120.00 387166 15115 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 120.00 399201 11/19/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 829.49 386819 8522200-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,240.83 387057 8523129-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 1,174.50 387056 8523141-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 549.75 387167 8523407-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,794.57 399202 11/19/2015 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 1,649.38 386897 50593723 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,649.38 399203 11/19/2015 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 275.00 EDITION EDINA DESIGN 387019 102915-10 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 275.00 399204 11/19/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 42.58- 386828 224294 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 53.16- 386827 224562 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 46.16- 386829 224642 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 162.32 386820 2874527 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 440.37 386821 2878243 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 349.16 386822 2878245 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 81.45 386826 2878246 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,273.75 386825 2878254 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 808.79 386823 2878255 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,006.44 386824 2878256 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .20 387171 2881771 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 201.28 387169 2881773 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 101.80 387174 2881774 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 234.02 387177 2881775 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,021.54 387176 2881778 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 412.46 387173 2881779 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,583.47 387175 2881780 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,534.34 387170 2881784 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015— 11/19/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 25 Business Unit 399204 11/19/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 151.82 387172 2881786 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,347.55 387168 2881787 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19,568.86 399205 11119/2015 134007 PJ TAILORS & CLEANERS 66.55 LAUNDER BLANKETS 386945 8026 1400.6201 LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.55 399206 11/19/2015 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.89 PEST CONTROL 387287 5145202 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.89 399207 11/19/2015 120988 PLYMOUTH FRAMERY 130.00 FRAMING FOR LUTZ ITEMS 387020 307639 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 130.00 399208 11/19/2015 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 4.00 ACCT 609425 387250 609425-10/15 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 67.78 ACCT 622833 387251 622833-10/15 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 71.78 399209 11/19/2015 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 936.00 OFFICIATING FEES 386898 110615 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 936.00 399210 11/19/2015 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 36,187.38 OCT 2015 RECYCLING 386899 3940000 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 36,187.38 399211 11/19/2015 135827 RICHARDSON NATURE CENTER 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 12/13/15 386927 110115 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 399212 11/19/2015 108659 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 EP PERFORMANCE 12/20/15 386929 110115 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 399213 11/19/2015 137538 RIFFS SMOKEHOUSE 25.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 387254 141 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 25.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015-- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399213 399214 11/19/2015 11/19/2015 137538 RIFFS SMOKEHOUSE 100485 SAFECO INSURANCE CO. Continued.., 1,476.50 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 387255 MICHELLE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SKINNER 1,476.50 399215 11/19/2015 117807 SAM'S CLUB 272.73 7715 0903 0487 2906 387288 102415 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 272.73 399216 11/19/2015 136074 SANDERS, STEVE 200.00 EP PERFORMANCE 12/10/15 386926 110115 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 399217 11/19/2015 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 104.00 OFFICIATING FEES 386900 110615 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 104.00 399218 11/19/2015 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 839.61 QUARTERLY BILLING - SR CTR 386973 8104132452 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 786.30 QUARTERLY BILLING - RAMP 386972 8104132961 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,625.91 399219 11/19/2015 135287 SEABERG, KURT 5.85 ART WORK SOLD 387201 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5.85 399220 11/19/2015 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 208.15 OFFICE SIGNS 387023 45604 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 249.00 OFFICE SIGNS 387023 45604 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 318.50 OFFICE SIGNS 387024 45648 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 775.65 399221 11/19/2015 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 RAMP TRASH ROOM CLEANING 386974 53177 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,650.00 399222 11/19/2015 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 33.12 ART WORK SOLD 387202 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 33.12 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399222 399223 11/19/2015 11/19/2015 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 120784 SIGN PRO Continued... 185.00 DASHERBOARD 387025 9725 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 298.00 DASHERBOARD 387026 9736 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 53.64 SIGNS 387115 9758 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 60.00 MONTHLY SPECIAL SIGNS 386901 9761 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 60.00 MONTHLY SPECIAL SIGNS 386901 9761 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 60.00 MONTHLY SPECIAL SIGNS 386901 9761 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 716.64 399224 11/19/2015 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 55.65 TIMECLOCK RENTAL 387256 13074507 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 55.65 399225 11/19/2015 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 56.75 HOT DOG BUNS 386902 274857 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 56.75 399226 11/19/2015 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 87.10 SADDLE 00006431 387027 73907098 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 87.10 399227 11/19/2015 132195 SMALL LOT MN 120.00 369029 2242 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 120.00 399228 11/19/2015 135719 SOLARWINDS 2,267.00 MAINTENANCE 386946 IN246755 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,267.00 399229 11/19/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,824.65 386831 1343702 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,457.52 386830 1343703 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 671.42 386834 1343709 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,467.94 386833 1343710 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,224.00 386832 1343711 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 96.80 387178 1346120 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 517.15 387180 1346122 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 107.80 387179 1346123 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 307.53 387063 1346124 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015-- 11/19/2015 Page - 28 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399229 11/19/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 8,877.40 387065 1346125 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 4,970.18 387064 1346126 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 90.71 387066 1346127 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 112.80 387062 1346128 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,207.87 387058 1346129 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 140.04 387059 1346130 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 786.00 387060 1346131 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,495.31 387061 1346132 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 41,355.12 399230 11/19/2015 110977 SOW, ADAMA 156.00 ART WORK SOLD 387203 110515 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 156.00 399231 11/19/2015 105193 SPAIN, MARK 295.00 TREE REMOVAL, STUMP GRINDING 387028 BRAEMAR GOLF 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 295.00 399232 11/19/2015 134925 STACON 869.77 LEVEL SENSOR 00001990 386975 1N00078069 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 869.77 399233 11/19/2015 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 833.95 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 386903 100101406 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 833.95 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 386903 100101406 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 833.95 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 386903 100101406 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,501.85 399234 11/19/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 205.75 386835 6812 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 168.00 387067 6834 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 373.75 399235 11/19/2015 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 745.00 WIFI CABLING CLP 386948 19025 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 1,461.89 WIFI CABLING CLP 386949 19026 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 2,467.07 WIFI CABLING CLP 386950 19027 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 796.80 LIQUOR STORE CABLING 386947 19029 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 929.60 LIQUOR STORE CABLING 386947 19029 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 1,195.30 LIQUOR STORE CABLING 386947 19029 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015-- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399235 399236 11/19/2015 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. Continued... 11/19/2015 7,595.66 208.00 FIRE ALARM INSPECTION 386977 1091755 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 208.00 399237 11/1912015 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 166.00 GOLF CART 387116 293813 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 74.04- CREDIT 387117 827371 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 91.96 399238 11/19/2015 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA 435.84 CONCESSION PRODUCT 387257 511100084 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 435.84 399239 11/19/2015 137534 TC STEEL HOCKEY CLUB 1,400.00 DOME LABOR 387258 111315 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,400.00 399240 11/19/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 183.05 387069 929196 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 156.95 387068 929197 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,849.68 387071 929198 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 174.40 387070 929600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 81.80 387118 930071 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,807.69 387181 988714 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8,253.57 399241 11/19/2015 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 1,077.06 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 387029 3002185484 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 1,077.06 399242 11/19/2015 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 386904 2015-134818 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 386904 2015-134818 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 386904 2015-134818 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 990.00 399243 11/19/2015 136802 TINBERG, TIM 49.84 BANISTER REPAIR SUPPLIES 387119 111115 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015-- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399243 11/19/2015 136802 TINBERG, TIM Continued... 49.84 399244 11/19/2016 128347 TKO WINES INC. 631.20 386836 2355 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 432.00 386837 2423 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,063.20 399245 11/19/2015 120595 1-MOBILE 67.74 477067848 386951 477067848-10/15 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 67.74 399246 11/19/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 73.57 WELDING GAS 386978 40035989 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.53 WELDING CYLINDERS 387120 40035990 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 105.10 399247 11/19/2015 136821 TONKA WATER 40.75 COMPRESSOR FILTERS 00001043 386905 1002856-IN 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 40.75 399248 11/19/2015 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 232.35 PRINTER USAGE 387289 63751159 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 232.35 399249 11/19/2015 123470 TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT/KIDSDANCE PRODUCTION 100.00 EDINBOROUGH PK NEWYEARS EVE 387121 12/31/15 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DEPOSIT 100.00 399250 11/19/2015 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 4,828.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL, PARTS00001930 386979 87276 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 4,828.00 399251 11/19/2015 116535 TRAVELERS 35.00 387124 000491714 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 105.00 387123 000491715 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 140.40 DEDUCTIBLE 387122 000492073 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 332.50 387125 000492074 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 612.90 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 Page - 31 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399252 11/19/2015 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Continued... 577.89 UNIFORMS 387126 103115 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 577.89 399253 11/19/2015 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 8.63 SHIPPING CHARGES 387259 TRAN: 4379 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 8.63 399254 11/19/2015 102275 VAN BLOEM GARDENS 38.30 FLOWERS 387260 4336623 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 38.30 399255 11/19/2015 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 625.00 WINTER CATALOG DESIGN 387127 2015-3 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 625.00 399256 11/1912015 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.01 386907 9751542899 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 35.01 386907 9751542899 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 35.01 386907 9751542899 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 70.02 386907 9751542899 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 210.06 386907 9751542899 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 280.10 386907 9751542899 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 350.10 386907 9751542899 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 770.22 386907 9751542899 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 875.40 386907 9751542899 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.01 386907 9751542899 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 35.01 386907 9751542899 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 418.99 386907 9751542899 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 53.05 386906 9751595245 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 828.90 386906 9751595245 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.15 386906 9751595245 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 106.10 386906 9751595245 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 35.01 386909 9753187573 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 35.01 386909 9753187573 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 35.01 386909 9753187573 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 70.02 386909 9753187573 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 210.06 386909 9753187573 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 280.18 386909 9753187573 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 350.10 386909 9753187573 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 638.36 386909 9753187573 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015-- 11/19/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Page - 32 Business Unit 399256 11/19/2015 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS Continued... 864.86 386909 9753187573 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.01 386909 9753187573 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 35.01 386909 9753187573 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 385.11 386909 9753187573 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 50.48 386908 9753240232 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 788.25 386908 9753240232 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.05 386908 9753240232 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 100.96 386908 9753240232 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 35.01 386911 9754829344 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 35.01 386911 9754829344 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 35.01 386911 9754829344 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 70.02 386911 9754829344 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 210.06 386911 9754829344 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 280.10 386911 9754829344 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 350.10 386911 9754829344 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 728.72 386911 9754829344 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 910.34 386911 9754829344 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.01 386911 9754829344 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 35.01 386911 9754829344 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 547.81 386911 9754829344 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 50.48 386910 9754881984 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 788.25 386910 9754881984 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.05 386910 9754881984 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 100.96 386910 9754881984 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 12,358.56 399257 11/19/2015 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 445.03 GASKETS, RODS 00006432 387030 1106150001 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 445.03 399258 11/19/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 452.52 LIGHT TIMER AND CONTROL 00001937 386981 9837868 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 213.30 GFCI FOR POLE LIGHTS 00001975 386912 9841728 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 214.44 GFCI FOR STREET LIGHTS 00001975 386912 9841728 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 200.00 GFCI FOR POLE LIGHTS 00001975 386912 9841728 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,102.27 PIN-PLUG FOR LOAD BANK 00001943 386980 9848480 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 2,182.53 399259 11/19/2015 137542 WANDERSEE WALTER, NANCY 89.00 COURSE REFUND 387290 110315 7414.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PUBLIC PROGRAMS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Page - 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/19/2015-- Inv No 11/19/2015 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399259 11/19/2015 137542 WANDERSEE WALTER, NANCY Continued... 89.00 399260 11/19/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 38.66 386983 7245159 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 115.60 386982 7246212 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 154.26 399261 11/19/2015 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 264.56 DIESEL 387034 218979 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 288.40 DIESEL 387035 218991 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 294.23 DIESEL 387036 218998 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 151.41 DIESEL 387037 219010 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 491.28 GAS 387031 219592 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 1,391.59 GAS 387032 219594 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 289.30 DIESEL 387033 219631 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,170.77 399262 11/19/2015 130574 WATSON COMPANY 551.07 CONCESSION PRODUCT 387263 857964 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 551.07 399263 11/19/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 16.00- 386845 705088 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 336.00- 386847 705158 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,155.48- 386846 705225 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 831.48 386843 7054277 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 340.50_ 386844 7054279 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,267.30 386842 7054283 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 835.57 387185 7055307 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 487.22 387186 7055308 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,488.44 387187 7055311 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,318.51 387184 7055312 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14,061.54 399264 11/19/2015 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 4,397.64 FUNGICIDE 387038 60517917 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4,397.64 399265 11/19/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2.30 386848 1080390748 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015- 11/19/2015 Page - 34 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399265 11/19/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 5,507.43 386850 1080390749 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 170.30 386855 1080391486 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,239.89 386849 1080393686 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 77.20 386852 1080393687 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 154.73 386853 1080393688 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,985.65 386854 1080393689 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,438.15 386851 1080393691 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,542.68 387076 1080396730 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,203.74 387075 1080396731 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,664.59 387188 1080396732 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8,598.35 387077 1080396784 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 411.19 387078 1080396785 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.46- 387079 2080106689 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 128.00- 387080 2080108862 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 35.04- 387086 2080108872 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 219.00- 387081 2080108878 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 45.00- 387085 2080108885 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 202.48- 387082 2080108916 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 359.12- 387083 2080108961 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 108.50- 387084 2080108971 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 34,889.60 399266 11/19/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 298.00 386856 1090487979 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,052.50 387087 1090488629 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,592.65 386858 1090488630 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,592.47 386857 1090488681 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,518.25 387088 1090489454 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.80 387089 1090489455 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,601.27 387189 1090491463 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22,678.94 399267 11/19/2015 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC. 252.95 GLOVES 00003687 386915 E1392785 6001.8070 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE RISK MGMT REVENUES 252.95 399268 11/19/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 59.39 51-8997917-7 386918 477976982 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 868.06 51-5619094-8 386917 478118754 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 6,405.03 51-6824328-7 386916 478135563 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:03 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/19/2015— 11/19/2015 Page - 35 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 399268 11/19/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 2,736.80 51-5888961-7 386952 478304139 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 653.80 51-4197645-8 387039 478458990 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 4,767.76 51-6121102-5 387128 478488584 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30,673.93 51-5605640-1 387291 478843660 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 46,164.77 399269 11/19/2016 101091 ZIEGLER INC 3,159.25 COMPRESSOR RENTAL 387040 E9842101 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,159.25 399270 11/19/2015 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 857.69 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003631 387041 2304325 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 857.69 1,225,857.02 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P AC H Payment Total Payments 925,664.37 300,192.65 1,225,857.02 -. . - 4141.1MININI 40, er AP' Fin R55CKS2 LOG1S100 CITY OF EDINA 11/16/201515:30:15 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 11/19/2015 - 11/19/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 366,623.10 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,191.16 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 84.00 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 500.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 6,006.03 04500 CANDO FUND 18,306.90 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,434.55 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 167.24 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 59.65 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 432,261.98 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 7,824.39 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 6,969.11 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 9,008.79 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,268.88 05800 LIQUOR FUND 291,494.49 05900 UTILITY FUND 39,372.55 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,004.47 05950 RECYCLING FUND 36,187.38 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 252.95 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,83940 Report Totals 1,225,857.02 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies as' pro141 res date Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2015-24: Amending Chapter 2 Concerning Boards & Commissions Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2015-24 waiving second reading of the ordinance INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this ordinance is to correct an editing error that occurred while recodification took place. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Ord. No. 2015-24 Ord. No. 2015-24 Amending Chapter 2 December 1, 2015 Mayor & City Council Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Ordinance No. 2015-24 Amending Chapter 2 Concerning Boards And Commissions Information / Background: In 2011 Edina re-codified its Code of Ordinances. During the re-codification process an editing error occurred that omitted the Edina Community Health Commission, from Edina Code, Chapter 2, Section 2-81. Appointment of membership. This was a technical oversight that needs an ordinance adopted to correct the situation. Staff has prepared the needed ordinance adding the Edina Community Health Commission to the section as follows: “Sec. 2-81. - Appointment and terms of membership. (a) Regular members. Board and commission members shall be appointed by majority vote of the council. Members of Arts & Culture, Edina Community Health Commission, Energy & Environment, Construction Board of Appeals, Heritage Preservation Board, Human Rights & Relations, Park Board and Transportation Commission are eligible to serve two three-year terms. Members of the planning commission are eligible to serve three three-year terms, Members of the Board of Appeal & Equalization are eligible to serve six one-year terms. A member in good standing shall serve until a successor has been appointed.” Staff recommends Council consider adopting the ordinance including the waiver of second reading so the correction can be completed. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 2. Section 2-81 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 2-81. - Appointment and terms of membership. (a) Regular members. Board and commission members shall be appointed by majority vote of the council. Members of Arts & Culture, Edina Community Health Commission, Energy & Environment, Construction Board of Appeals, Heritage Preservation Board, Human Rights & Relations, Park Board and Transportation Commission are eligible to serve two three-year terms. Members of the planning commission are eligible to serve three three-year terms, Members of the Board of Appeal & Equalization are eligible to serve six one-year terms. A member in good standing shall serve until a successor has been appointed. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: December 1, 2015 Second Reading: Waived Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT, THURSDAY, SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:2016 Calendar of Meetings With Revisions Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion approving revised 2016 Calendar of Meetings INTRODUCTION: After the Council approved the 2016 Calendar it was discovered that a member had conflicts with the first meetings in July and September of 2016. Mayor Hovland suggested the July 5, 2016 be cancelled. The first meeting in September would be moved from Tuesday, September 6, 2016 to Wednesday, September 7, 2016. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2016 Revised Calendar of Meetings 2016 CITY OF EDINA COUNCIL AND ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS MEETINGS, HOLIDAYS, DAYS OF RELIGOUS OBSERVANCE AND ELECTION DATES Holidays City Council Nite to Unite Pln Comm HP Brd Trns Com Park Brd Indicates a religious holiday's observance Caucus Night Elect Day Health Human R/R Com E& E Comm Arts & Culture Comm JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 27 28 29 30 31 31 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 30 31 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER Meeting Schedule for 2016. Dates Subject to Change Revised December 1, 2015 Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2015-117: Approving Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2016 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2015-117 Approving Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2016. INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution 2015-117 Approving Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees for 2016. The ambulance fees as presented by the Fire Department reflect minor changes to primarily address cost of living increase. No significant changes are recommended this year. The fees that are proposed to change from 2015 to 2016 are in bold. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2015-117: Approving Ambulance and Miscellaenous Fire Fees for 2016 RESOLUTION NUMBER 2015 - 117 SETTING AMBULANCE AND MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES FOR 2016 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following ambulance service and miscellaneous fire fees for 2016. AMBULANCE FEES Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and/or transportation to a medical facility: 2015 2016 Level 1 - ON SCENE TREATMENT Specialized medical services performed at scene with no transport involved ALS TREATMENT – NO TRANSPORT Admin. Of One or more medications with no transport $450.00 $460.00 Level 2 - MINOR CARE (BLS) BASIC LIFE SUPPORT Vital Signs, Splinting, Bandaging $1,550.00 $1,580.00 Level 3 - MODERATE CARE ALS-1 ALS Assessment, O2, IV, Nitroglycerin Translingual Spray, ASA, Nitrous Oxide, 3-12 Lead EKG Monitoring, Spine Immobilization, Ultrasound, Glucose Monitoring, CO Monitoring, O2 Monitoring $1,550.00 $1,580.00 Level 4 - MAJOR CARE ALS-2 ALS Assessment and any of the following: 3 or more Medications Cardiac Pacing Cardioversion Defibrillation Intraosseous Infusions Surgical Airway Management Chest Decompression Endotracheal Intubation Central Venous Line, End-Tidal CO2 Monitoring PCT (inflated) Cardio/Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) $1,725.00 $2,010.00 RESPONSE TO SCENE AND NO TREATMENT No Charge No Charge OR TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION Included in above Included in above MILEAGE FROM SCENE TO HOSPITAL $22.00/mile $23.00/mile ADDITIONAL STAFFING OR MECHANICAL EXTRICATION VEHICLE DECONTAMINATION $660.00/hour 1 hour minimum $900.00 $673.00 1 hour minimum $1,008.00 MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES SPECIALIZED RESPONSE 2015 2016 Engine/Fire Company* $515.00 $525.30 Ladder Company* $679.80 $693.40 HazMat Unit* $751.90 $766.90 Special Operations Team* $947.60 $966.60 Limited Response* $257.50 $262.65 Gas Line Rupture Response* $442.90 $451.75 Specialized Equipment* Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Supplies or Additional Personnel Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Disposal Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Other City Resources Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Ambulance Standby* $220.00 $225.00 * Charges are per hour – one hour minimum Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 1st day of December, 2015. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 1, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 20___. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2015-118: Approving Park and Recreation Fees for 2016 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2015-118 Approving Park and Recreation Fees for 2016 INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution 2015-118 Approving Park and Recreation fees for 2016. Park fees other than Art Center fees were approved by the Park Board. The fees that are proposed to change from 2015 to 2016 are in bold. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2015-118: Approving Park and Recreation Fees for 2016 RESOLUTION NUMBER 2015-118 SETTING PARK AND RECREATION FEES FOR 2016 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following Park and Recreation Fees for 2016. PARK AND RECREATION 2015 2016 Adult Tennis Instruction $62.00 $67.00 Youth Tennis Instruction Two Days $38.00 $40.00 Youth Tennis Instruction Three Days $62.00 $65.00 Pee Wee Tennis $38.00 $40.00 Team Tennis $105.00 $105.00 Tennis Camp $104.00 $104.00 Playground $45.00 $55.00 Fab 4 & 5 $95.00 $105.00 Small Wonders $69.00 NA Safety Camp $35.00 $40.00 Super 6 & 7 $62.00 $72.00 Cheerleading Camp $50.00 $53.00 Highlands Explorers $69.00 $79.00 Playground Pros $75.00 $85.00 Travelin’ Teens $114.00 $144.00 Pre-Creators $95.00 NA Intro to Sports/Pre-Games $95.00 NA Tiny Tot Sports $95.00 NA Creative Kids $85.00 $95.00 Sports of All Sorts $69.00 NA Intro to Sports NA $35.00 Nature Nuts $85.00 $95.00 Centennial Lakes Challenge $25.00 $25.00 Disc Golf Varies NA Garden Camp $70.00 $70.00 Glow Dodgeball $13.00 $15.00 Wrestling $50.00 $50.00 Playground Creators $69.00 $79.00 Playground Performers $69.00 $79.00 Leaders in Training $45.00 $45.00 Fishing Clinic $10.00 $10.00 Barnyard Boogie $5.00/per person $5.00/per person Santa’s Breakfast (at Edinborough Park) $10.00 Members $15.00/Non-Members $10.00 Members $15.00/Non-Members Schools Out $25.00 $25.00 Garden Plot Rental $35.00 $35.00 Contracted Programs Skyhawks Varies Varies Party Unit Varies Varies Soccer Shots Camp Varies Varies KidCreate Studio (Reach Education Solutions) Varies Varies Once Upon a Star Parties Varies Varies Three Rivers Park District Varies Varies Mini-Hornets (with EFA) Varies Varies ADULT ATHLETIC FEES SUMMER SOFTBALL LEAGUES BASKETBALL 2015 2016 2015 2016 Men’s League $495.00 $500.00 5-Man C League $575.00 $580.00 Men’s League – Resident Discount Rate $435.00 $440.00 5-Man C League Resident Discount $515.00 $520.00 Co-Rec League $535.00 $540.00 5-Man B League $575.00 $580.00 Co-Rec League – Resident Discount Rate $475.00 $480.00 5-Man B League Resident Discount $515.00 $520.00 Men’s Double Header League $735.00 $740.00 HOCKEY Men’s Double Header League – Resident Discount Rate $675.00 $680.00 4-Man League $305.00 $325.00 4-Man League Resident Discount $255.00 $275.00 VOLLEYBALL BROOMBALL Officiated Leagues $415.00 $415.00 Co-Rec League $370.00 $370.00 Officiated Leagues – Resident Discount Rate $365.00 $375.00 Co-Rec League Resident Discount $320.00 $320.00 CO-REC KICKBALL C-Rec Kickball $150.00 $150.00 Co-Rec League Resident Discount $125.00 $125.00 PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS 2015 2016 2015 2016 General Park Areas Athletic Fields (Residents Only) Resident Use/hour $50.00 $55.00 Per field – per day $139.00 $139.00 Resident Use/day $140.00 $145.00 Per field – per hour $50.00 $50.00 Commercial Use (i.e. TV)/hr $80.00 $85.00 Per field – per hour w/lights $77.00 $77.00 Commercial use with light/hr $135.00 $140.00 Athletic Turf Field – per hour NA $65.00 Showmobile/day $700.00 $700.00 Edina Athletic Associations Field user fee/participant $11.00 $11.00 Van Valkenburg/Courtney Fields (Residents Only) Gymnasium user fee/participant $11.00 $11.00 Per field/day includes building $165.00 $170.00 Outdoor hockey rink user fee/participant $11.00 $11.00 Inclusion fee/participant $1.00 $1.00 Rosland Park Pathway (Scheduled Walk/Run Events) Utley Park Fire Ring Rental (Residents Only) Per Hour $75.00 $85.00 Fire Ring – per day $28.00 $28.00 Per Day $225.00 $250.00 Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only Residents Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only Non-Residents Per hour, first hour $85.00 NA Per hour, first hour $105.00 NA Each add’l hour up to 3 hrs $55.00 NA Each add’l hour up to 3 hrs $75.00 NA Per day (4 hours or more) $205.00 NA Per day (4 hours or more) $270.00 NA Arneson Acres Park/Gazebo Only Residents Arneson Acres Park/Gazebo Only Non-Residents ½ day (6 hrs or less) $85.00 $90.00 ½ day (6 hrs or less) $105.00 $110.0 0 Full day (over 6 hours) $120.00 $125.00 Full day (over 6 hours) $155.00 $160.0 0 Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo: Residents Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo: Non-Residents Per hour, first hour $120.00 NA Per hour, first hour $140.00 NA Each add’l hour up to 3 hrs $60.00 NA Each add’l hour up to 3 hrs $70.00 NA Per day (4 hours or more) $250.00 NA Per day (4 hours or more) $294.00 NA Half-day rental* NA $250.00 Half-day rental* NA $300.0 0 Full-day rental* NA $350.00 Full-day rental* NA $400.0 0 Picnic Shelter Rentals - full day (Residents Only) Picnic Shelter Rentals - half day (Residents Only) Chowen Park $44.00 $46.00 Chowen Park $28.00 $30.00 Sherwood Park $44.00 $46.00 Sherwood Park $28.00 $30.00 Wooddale Park $44.00 $46.00 Wooddale Park $28.00 $30.00 Utley Park NA $46.00 Utley Park NA $30.00 Rosland Park $155.00 $157.00 Park Shelter Buildings Rentals - full day (Residents Only) Park Shelter Buildings Rentals - half-day (Residents Only) Cornelia School Park $105.00 $110.00 Cornelia School Park $70.00 $75.00 Countryside Park $105.00 $110.00 Countryside Park $70.00 $75.00 Pamela Park $105.00 $110.00 Pamela Park $70.00 $75.00 Todd Park $105.00 $110.00 Todd Park $70.00 $75.00 Walnut Ridge Park $105.00 $110.00 Walnut Ridge Park $70.00 $75.00 Weber Park $105.00 $110.00 Weber Park $70.00 $75.00 *Half-day rentals are either 9-3pm or 4-10pm Monday-Friday. Only full-day rentals allowed on Saturday and Sunday BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 2015 2016 Green Fees 18 hole - non-patron $39.00/$42.00* $39.00/$42.00* 18 hole – patron $31.00/$32.00* $31.00/$32.00* Senior – patron (age 62 and older) $29.00/$30.00* $29.00/$30.00* Senior – non-patron (age 62 and older) $37.00/$39.00* $37.00/$39.00* 9 hole - non-patron $20.00/$21.00* $20.00/$21.00* 9 hole – patron $16.00/$17.00* $16.00/$17.00* Masters Senior (Patrons age 75 and older) $25.00/$27.00* $25.00/$27.00* College Age Rate $26.00/$30.00* $26.00/$30.00* Junior 18 Hole Rate $20.00 $20.00 Junior 9 Hole Rate $12.00 $12.00 GROUP FEES - 18 holes $49.00 $49.00 GROUP FEES - 9 holes $25.00 $25.00 Patron Cards Resident Patron Card before April 1 $75.00 $75.00 Resident Patron Card after March 31 $80.00 $80.00 Non-Resident Patron Card before April 1 $90.00 $90.00 Non-Resident Patron Card after March 31 $95.00 $95.00 Computerized Handicaps Resident $27.00 $32.00 Non-Resident $32.00 $37.00 Lockers Men’s 72 inch $40.00 $40.00 Men’s 42 inch $30.00 $30.00 Ladies 72 inch $20.00 $20.00 Club Storage $50.00 $50.00 Club Rental $25.00 $25.00 Push Carts – 9 Hole $5.00 $5.00 Push Carts – 18 Hole $7.00 $7.00 Golf Cars 18 holes $31.00 $31.00 9 holes $19.00 $19.00 Group Car Fees $38.00 $38.00 Group Golf Lessons Adult $105.00 $105.00 Junior $50.00 $50.00 Braemar Room Resident - wedding related $1,000.00 NA Non-residents - wedding related $1,200.00 NA Other events $375.00/$1,200.00 NA Monday-Thursday Afternoon: Up to 4 hours $275.00 $350.00 Monday-Thursday Afternoon: 4-6 hours $400.00 $500.00 Monday-Thursday Evening: Up to 4 hours $400.00 $500.00 Friday Afternoon: Up to 4 hours $275.00 $350.00 Friday Evening: Up to 4 hours NA $800.00 Friday Evening: 4-6 hours $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Saturday: Up to 6 hours $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Sunday: Up to 4 hours $1,000.00 $750.00 Additional (1) hour periods NA $100.00 Braemar Driving Range Large Bucket $7.75 $9.00 Small Bucket $5.25 $5.00 Warm-Up Bucket $3.00 NA *Weekend rate Friday through Sunday. BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE 2015 2016 Green Fees Adult non-patron $15.50 $15.50 Adult patron $12.50 $12.50 Junior $10.00 $10.00 Junior – 10 Round Card $75.00 $75.00 Patron Cards Adults Only (18 and older) $25.00 $25.00 Golf Cars Golf Cars (everyone) $15.00 $15.00 Pull Carts $3.00 $3.00 Group Fees $18.00 $18.00 GOLF DOME Large Bucket $9.00 $9.00 Senior Bucket $8.50 NA Time Golf ½ hour $14.00 $14.00 Hourly Field Rental $175.00 $175.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK 2015 2016 Pool & Track Daily Admission Pool & Track Daily Passes (Residents/Non-Residents) $7.00 *$7.50 Pool & Track 10 Admission Pass Pool & Track 10 admission pass residents/non- residents $60.00 *$64.50 Pool & Track Annual Membership Edina Individual $260.00 $260.00 Each Additional Member $90.00 $90.00 Non-Edina Individual $290.00 $290.00 Each Additional Member $100.00 $100.00 Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 Birthday Party Packages/2 Hours Adventure Package $160.00 $160.00 Peak Package $100.00 $100.00 BUILDING RENTALS – Non-Exclusive Rentals/Hr Great Hall $350.00 $350.00 Theater $250.00 $250.00 Grotto $200.00 $200.00 Adventure Peak $300.00 $300.00 Party Plateau – 10 Tables $125.00 $125.00 Pool (swim team only) $45.00 $45.00 Pool Other NA $60.00 Commercial Photo Shoot (Hourly) Domestic Photo Shoot (Hourly) 2015 2016 2015 2016 Any Park Area Blocked Off $250.00 $250.00 Any Park Area Blocked Off $200.00 $200.00 Grotto $250.00 $250.00 Grotto $200.00 $200.00 Theatre $250.00 $250.00 Theatre $200.00 $200.00 Great Hall $350.00 $350.00 Great Hall $350.00 $350.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK “PLAYPARK” 2015 2016 Playpark Daily Admission Resident $7.00 *$7.50 Non-resident $7.00 *$7.50 Children Under 12 Months FREE FREE Adults Free w/ paid child Free w/ paid child Edinborough Association Members Daily Pass $6.00 $6.00 Playpark – 10 Admission Pass Resident $60.00 *$64.50 Non-resident $60.00 *$64.50 Resident Season Pass First Member $85.00 $85.00 Each Additional Member $65.00 $65.00 Non-Resident Season Pass First Member $110.00 $110.00 Each Additional Member $90.00 $90.00 Total Facility Daily Admission Resident $12.00 *$13.00 Non-resident $12.00 *$13.00 *Denotes fees with tax included We will be charging sales tax (7.275%) to all other fees, charges and purchases AQUATIC CENTER 2015** 2016** Season Tickets Resident: Individual or First Family Member *$47.00/$52.00 *$53.00/$59.00 Each Additional Member *$43.00/$58.00 *$48.00/$54.00 Non-Resident: Individual or First Family Member *$60.00/$65.00 *$68.00/$74.00 Each Additional Member *$55.00/$60.00 *$62.00/$68.00 Season FlowRider additional per person *$25.00/$45.00 NA*** Daily Admissions Daily Admission (resident & non-resident) $10.00 $11.25 Admission after 5 pm $8.00 $9.00 Daily Admission FlowRider additional per person $5.00 $5.75 Aquatic/FlowRider Instruction Aquatic Instruction Contracted Contracted FlowRider Rental and Instruction – 30 minutes $55.00 $59.00 FlowRider Rental and Instruction – 1 hour $100.00 $108.00 *Early Bird Special if purchased no later than April 30, 2016. **2015 rates DO NOT include tax, 2016 rates DO include tax ***Flowrider included with season pass purchase CENTENNIAL LAKES 2015 2016 2015 2016 Rental Concession Items Weekend Rental – 6 Hour Period Paddle Boats - 4 person boat ½ hr. $9.00 $10.00 Friday evening $1,150.00 $1,150.00 Saturday evening $1,150.00 $1,150.00 Winter sled per hr. $7.00 $7.00 Ice Skate $6.00 $6.00 Building Rentals Champion Putting ½ day – Salon M-TH $250.00 $250.00 9 hole $5.00 $6.00 Sunday – ½ day Salon $400.00 $400.00 18 hole $10.00 $10.00 Amphitheater Rental Lawn Games Amphitheater Rental $300.00 $300.00 Per Court $20.00/hr. $20.00/hr. Commercial Photo Shoot $50.00/hr. $50.00/hr. ARENA 2015 2016 Hourly Rate (as of 9/16) $210.00 $220.00 Off Season Non-Prime $155.00 $160.00 Off Season Prime (Sun-Thurs Evening.) $165.00 $170.00 Early Morning/Undesirable Ice $75.00 $80.00 Outdoor Rink EHA $130.00 $135.00 Outdoor Rink After March 16 $155.00 $170.00 Open skating (Youth and Adult) $5.00 $5.00 Skate Rental $3.00 $3.00 Developmental Skating (Ice and Hockey) Resident NA $8.00 Developmental Skating (Ice and Hockey) Non- Resident NA $10.00 Goalie Skating NA $28.00/hr Birthday Party Open Skating $99.00 $99.00 Room Rental $25.00 $25.00 Room Set-Up/Clean-Up $25.00 $25.00 Ballet Room Rental No Set Up NA $20.00 Futsal NA $25.00 Open Futsal NA $3.00 Memberships (set first week of September) Open Skating Membership Resident Family: First 2 members $115.00 $115.00 Each additional member $10.00 $10.00 Maximum (7 persons) $165.00 $165.00 Resident Individual $105.00 $105.00 Non-Resident Family: First 2 members $130.00 $130.00 Each additional member $10.00 $10.00 Maximum (7 persons) $180.00 $180.00 Non-Resident Individual $115.00 $115.00 Open Skating Punch Card NA $40.00 Developmental Ice/Hockey Membership 4-5 times per week NA $150.00/month 3 times per week NA $80.00/month 1-2 times per week NA $50.00/month Developmental Punch Card (10 visits) NA $72.00 Classes Classes – 30 or 60 minutes $12.00/$23.00 $13.00/$24.00 BRAEMAR FIELD 2015 2016 Hourly Rates Full Field Prime (Mon-Fri 4pm-10pm/Sat, Sun 7am-10pm) $350.00 $360.00 Half Field Prime (Mon-Fri 4pm-10pm/Sat, Sun 7am-10pm) $175.00 $180.00 Full Field Shoulder Season (Mon-Fri 4pm-10pm/Sat, Sun 7am-10pm) NA $280.00 Half Field Shoulder Season (Mon-Fri 4pm-10pm/Sat, Sun 7am-10pm) NA $140.00 Quarter Field Shoulder Season (Mon-Fri 4pm-10pm/Sat, Sun 7am-10pm) – Scheduled within 7 days of use NA $70.00 70’ Batting Cage $60.00 $60.00 50’ Batting Cage $50.00 $50.00 70’ Batting Cage – Half hour $30.00 $30.00 50’ Batting Cage – Half hour $25.00 $25.00 Full Field Non-Prime $150.00 $150.00 Half Field Non-Prime $75.00 $75.00 Open Turf Time $3.00 $4.00 Residents – No Dome/Field Only $65.00 $65.00 Non-Residents – No Dome/Field Only $100.00 $100.00 Residents Field Only Non-Prime – Quarter NA $20.00 Non-Residents Field Only Non-Prime - Quarter NA $25.00 Residents Field Only Non-Prime – Half NA $30.00 Non-Residents Field Only Non-Prime – Half NA $35.00 Residents Field Only Non-Prime – Full NA $40.00 Non-Residents Field Only Non-Prime - Full NA $45.00 ART CENTER 2015 2016 Classes Youth, includes Art Academy $9.00/hr $10.00/hr Pottery $9.00/hr $10.00/hr Drawing & Painting $9.00/hr $10.00/hr Watermedia $9.00/hr $10.00/hr Photography $9.00/hr $10.00/hr Jewelry & Metals $9.00/hr $10.00/hr Literary Arts & Dance $9.00/hr $10.00/hr Workshops Workshops; any medium $13.25/hr $14.00/hr Room Rental Margaret Foss Gallery Solo, Two-Four Person Show $150.00/exhibit $150.00/exhibit Group Shows of 5 or more Individuals $25.00/person/exhibit $25.00/person/exhibit Classroom $50.00/day $75.00/day Personal Studio $125.00/month $150.00/month Pottery Fees Pottery Studio Fees $2.00/number of weeks $3.00/number of weeks Pottery Firing Fees $1.75/pound $2.00/pound Updraft Kiln Rental $150.00/firing $200.00/firing Pug Mill Rental $10.00/100# Clay $20.00/100# Clay Glaze Testing Fee $5.00/500g batch $15.00/1000g batch Class Supply Fees Supply Fees $2.00/number of weeks $3.00/number of weeks Model Fees Portrait Model Class $12.00/hr $13.00/hr Figure Model Class $18.00/hr $20.00/hr Birthday Parties* Drawing & Painting Birthday Parties – Non- Member 1-10 Participants $17.00/hr/person $17.00/hr/person 11-20 Participants $18.00/hr/person $18.00/hr/person Drawing & Painting Birthday Parties - Member 1-10 Participants $15.00/hr/person $15.00/hr/person 11-20 Participants $16.00/hr/person $16.00/hr/person Pottery Birthday Parties – Non-Member 1-10 Participants $21.00/hr/person $21.00/hr/person 11-20 Participants $22.00/hr/person $22.00/hr/person Pottery Birthday Parties - Member 1-10 Participants $19.00/hr/person $19.00/hr/person 11-20 Participants $20.00/hr/person $20.00/hr/person Gift Shop Commission by Art Center to Artists 35% 35% Memberships Individual $35.00 $35.00 Family $50.00 $50.00 Contributing $51.00-$99.00 $51.00-$99.00 Sustaining $100.00-$499.00 $100.00-$499.00 Patron $500.00+ $500.00+ Edina Resident Discounts** Edina Resident Discount – Class Pricing $5.00 off $5.00 off Edina Resident Discount – Membership 10% 10% Edina Resident Discount – Gift Shop/Gallery No Add’l Discount No Add’l Discount *Includes instructor, clay, firing fees, paper plates, napkins, utensils. Pottery on the wheel parties – limit 12 people. **One class discount per session, membership discount is for any level EDINA SENIOR CENTER 2015 2016 Fees Golf League Membership (Braemar Course) $13.00 $13.00 Bowling League Membership $11.00 $11.00 Edina Senior Center Membership $17.00/$27.00 $17.00/$27.00 Greeting Cards $1.00 $1.00 Trips & Tours - Members $3.25 $4.25 Trips & Tours - Non-Members $5.25 $6.25 Defensive Driving $20.00/ $25.00 $22.00/ $25.00 Elder Learning Institute Classes $20.00 $20.00 Card Tournaments $1.00/person $1.00/person Social Card Groups (per person/per day) $.25 $.25 Podiatrist $3.00/Patient $3.00/patient Room Rental Classroom or Grandview Room – Resident (2 hr. min.) $40.00/hr. $40.00/hr. Classroom or Grandview Room – Non-resident (2 hr. min.) .$45.00/hr. .$45.00/hr. Classroom – Resident – more than 4 hours .$150.00 .$150.00 Classroom – Non-resident – more than 4 hours $200.00 $200.00 Fireside Room – per day – Resident .$170.00 .$170.00 Fireside Room – per day – Non-resident .$200.00 .$200.00 Fireside Room – per hour – Resident .$50.00 .$50.00 Fireside Room – per hour – Non-resident .$60.00 .$60.00 Wall Art Display Rental 15% of sale 15% of sale Equipment Rental Television/VCR/DVD $12.00 $12.00 Overhead Projector $7.00 $7.00 Portable Screen $7.00 $7.00 Dated: December 1, 2015. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 1, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 20___. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:2016 Human Services Funding Recommendation Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the 2016/2017 Human Services funding recommendations. INTRODUCTION: The 2015 Human Services Task Force convened to put forth a recommendation to City Council for 2016 funding. ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo: Task Force Funding Recommedation Staff Report: Human Services Task Force Funding for 2016 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Administration Department Human Services Task Force Date: November 17, 2015 To: Mayor and City Council cc: From: 2015 Human Services Task Force Subject: 2016/2017 Human Services Funding Recommendations The Human Services Task Force began their decision making process by inserting each of the task force member’s funding recommendations into a formula based spreadsheet. The formula then determined an average funding decision for each applicant. Next, the Task Force discussed each organization’s application with the following questions: ● Did this organization meet the basic health and human rights needs of our Edina residents? In our discussion, the Task Force stressed the importance of serving immediate needs. ● Additionally, the Task Force held a fair and balanced conversation where all task force members participated. The Task Force reviewed the responses received when the Task Force interviewed each organization. Some of the questions asked were: 1. What is the individual organization’s cost per unit of service provided and does the client receive a significant “value” from the service(s) provided? 2. How many Edina residents were served? 3. What partnerships do you have that to ensure the client is connected to a full spectrum of community supports and further, how do you communicate with them to safeguard there is no duplication of services? 4. What additional support measures are enacted to ensure a high client success rate? At a third meeting the Task Force revisited each applicant’s funding amount, per the averaging formula, and adjusted the recommendations based on the consensus based answers to above stated questions. The funding adjustments equated to either a slight decrease or increase, with the intention that each applicant was funded in an equitable manner. The Task Force is confident with their funding recommendations because they present the right balance between funding the youth and seniors in our City. Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Organization Proposed Recommend Justification/Rationale The Bridge for Youth $7,500 $6,500 ● Funded at same level as 2014 ● Increases in the past couple of years ● Given the past increases, they are adequately funded for their services Cornerstone Advocacy Service $15,000 $14,700 ● Funded at the same level as 2014 ● Important service to Edina’s police and prosecutor ● Follow-up support provided to ensure client’s long term success Normandale Center for Healing and Wholeness $9,000 $4,700 ● Funded at the same level as 2014 ● Adequately funded for their services ● Increased funding in the past two years Oasis for Youth $2,500 $2,500 ● Increased allocation by 20% ● Our funding assists their credibility to secure other funding ● Newly established organization that solidified partnerships in a short time ● Recognized increased need for this type of youth services Senior Community Services $25,000 $19,200 ● Increased allocation by 6% ● Last year’s task force noted a lack of fundraising efforts, this year they increased those efforts ● Funding this organization provides their clients with a multifaceted service ● Unique service of medicare counseling Store to Door $24,696 $11,700 ● Funded at the same level as 2014 ● Last year their funding award amount, more than doubled from the previous year. ● Adequately funded for their services VEAP $30,000 $25,000 ● Funded at the same level as 2013 and 2014 ● Adequately funded for their services ● Receiving the largest percentage of the funding Totals $118,696 $86,300 December 1, 2015 City Council and Mayor MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator 2015 Human Services Task Force Information / Background: The 2015 Task Force was comprised of 7 volunteer members: • Sarah Rinn, Task Force Chair (Human Rights and Relations Commission) • Bruce McLellan (Heritage Preservation Board) • Kip Peterson (Construction Board of Appeals) • Ellen Jones (Park Board) • Mike Platteter (Planning Commission) • Gabe Brosius (Student Member) • Ellie Bender (Student Member) The task force met 4 times over the course of October and November. • Monday, October 5 – the Task Force reviewed proposals • Wednesday, October 21 – the organizations who submitted proposals presented to the Task Force • Thursday, October 29 – the Task Force spoke with a panel comprised of the Edina PD, Edina Resource Center, and the Edina Senior Center and developed a funding recommendations • Tuesday, November 17 – the Task Force met with the City Council to present funding recommendations The original task force funding recommendation is included with this item. Below is additional information about each organization. These topics arose at the City Council work session on November 17, 2015. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Founded Edina Residents Served Edina Resident Cost Calculation for 2015 The Bridge for Youth 1970 2014: 42 residents 2016: 50-75 plus 300 texting contacts $133-200 per client. Cornerstone Advocacy Service 1983 2014: 124 residents 2016: 125-150 for total of 1,500 hrs of service 1,500 hours of service at $13 per hour Normandale Center for Healing & Wholeness 1998 2014: 242 2016: 242-250 $511.16 per client Oasis for Youth 2010 2014: 4 2015: 7 2016: 10-12 $250 per client Senior Community Services 1950 2014: 379 2016: 400 $50 per client Store to Door 1982 2014: 62 2016: 64 $433.27 per client VEAP 1973 2014: 1,138 2016: 1,138 $37 per client Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Request For Purchase: Finance Department Utility Billing Electronic Bill Pay and Presentment (EBPP) Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize City Manager to sign attached EBPP contract. INTRODUCTION: The Finance Department is recommending a change in the vendor the City uses to provide EBPP services to our utility customers. The attached request for purchase describes the reasons for this recommendation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Finance Department Utility Billing Electronic Bill Pay and Presentment (EBPP) Paymentus contract City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 December 1, 2015 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Request for Purchase: Finance Department Utility Billing Electronic Bill Pay and Presentment (EBPP) N/A N/A Paymentus $1.90 per transaction Recommended Quote or Bid: Paymentus Information/Background: The City of Edina started accepting online credit card payments for utility bills in December 2013. This practice is known as Electronic Bill Pay and Presentment, or EBPP. At the time the City chose a product offered for free by our IT partner, LOGIS. The only expense to the City for that product was the monthly fees we paid to the credit card companies, typically around 2-2.5% of transactions. The current LOGIS provided solution has allowed 900 of our customers to register accounts and make over 6,000 online utility bill payments in the last year totaling $1.8M in revenue. We also discovered some negative issues with the product. Issues include customers having difficulty with registration, scheduled and unscheduled downtime for the website, limited customization options, and limited internet browser compatibility. In addition to the issues the City and our customers are experiencing, LOGIS is struggling to support the product appropriately. Therefore, LOGIS made the decision that they would be winding down support for the product and advised all cities to find new solutions. LOGIS organized a vendor selection process that many LOGIS cities participated in. The vendor selection process started with about 5 different companies that each gave a presentation to LOGIS cities about their products. Edina had at least one representative at each presentation. The LOGIS cities unanimously agreed that two of the vendors best met the needs of all LOGIS cities. A team from Edina met with each of the two finalists again and selected Paymentus as the preferred provider for Edina. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 We feel that Paymentus offers several advantages over the current product as well as other products that were presented. The advantages include: Cost. While our current software is free, we pay fees to credit card companies for each transaction that is processed on the site. We estimate those fees at $40,000 in the past year. Paymentus uses a different model where the City pays $1.90 per transaction to Paymentus. The bundled services the City receives include both the software and credit card fees. We estimate savings up to 50% per transaction from this arrangement. However, if the system becomes more popular and more customers register and pay using this method, we may pay similar or even more in total dollars to Paymentus vs. our current product. Registration. During the product demonstration the registration process appears like it will be much easier for our customers. We expect higher numbers of registered users. Paymentus allows separate user profiles for one utility account, which is useful for properties that have both an owner and tenant that may want to register. The Paymentus platform works on many different browsers and devices using responsive web design. Customers will have options for payments on the site in addition to credit cards. Other options include eChecks, Integrated Voice Response (phone), recurring payments, scheduled payments, possibly even text payments. Paymentus allows message notifications and reminders to users by methods including voice, text, and email. Examples of messages might be payment due dates, credit card expiration, etc. Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance will be the responsibility of Paymentus instead of LOGIS or the City. Neither the City nor LOGIS will take or store any credit card information in the future. Staff recommends that Council authorize approval of the attached contract so that the City can continue accepting online credit card payments for utility bills. If the contract is approved, planning for transition and implementation will start immediately, but final “go live” won’t happen until sometime in 2016. LOGIS will continue to support our existing system until the go live date. Master Services Agreement – Absorbed Page 1 of 7 100205 MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT Client: City of Edina – MN Client Address: 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Contact for Notices to Client: Estimated Yearly Bills / Invoices: Lori Lohmann 100,000 This Master Services Agreement (“Master Agreement”) is entered into as of the Effective Date below, by and between the Client (“Client”) identified above and Paymentus Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (“Paymentus”). WHEREAS Paymentus desires to provide and the Client desires to receive certain services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Paymentus provides electronic bill payment services to utilities, municipalities, insurance and other businesses. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby covenant and agree as follows. This Agreement consists of this signature page, General Terms and Conditions, and the attachments (“Attachments”) with schedules (“Schedules”) listed below: Schedule A: Paymentus Service Fee Schedule This Agreement represents the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to its subject matter and supersedes all other written or oral agreements heretofore made by or on behalf of Paymentus or Client with respect to the subject matter hereof and may be changed only by agreements in writing signed by the authorized representatives of the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. Client: By: Name: Title: Date: By: Name: Title: Date: Paymentus: By: Name: Title: Date: Master Services Agreement – Absorbed Page 2 of 7 100205 GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1 Definitions: For the purposes of this Agreement, the following terms and words shall have the meaning ascribed to them, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. 1.1 “Agreement “ or “Contract” shall refer to this Agreement, as amended from time to time, which shall constitute an authorization for the term of this contract for Paymentus to be the exclusive provider of services, stated herein, to the Client 1.2 “User” shall mean the users of the Client’s services 1.3 “Effective Date” shall be the last date upon which the parties signed this Agreement. The Agreement will not be effective against any party until the said date 1.4 “Launch Date” shall be the date on which Client launches this service to the Users 1.5 “Payment” shall mean Users to make payments for Client’s services or Client’s bills 1.6 “Payment Amount” shall mean the bill amount User wants to pay to the Client. 1.7 “Services” shall include the performance of the Services outlined in section 2 of this Agreement 1.8 “Paymentus Authorized Processor” shall mean a Paymentus authorized merchant account provider and payment processing gateway 1.9 “Average Bill Amount” shall mean the total amount of Payments collected through Paymentus system in a given month divided by the number of the Payments for the same month. 2 Description of Services to be performed 2.1 Scope of Services Paymentus shall provide Users the opportunity to make Payments by Visa, MasterCard, Discover, E-check and other payment methods as deemed necessary by Paymentus. Payments may be made by Interactive Telephone Voice Response System (“IVR”) or secure Internet interface provided at the Paymentus Corporation’s web site or other websites part of Paymentus’ Instant Payment Network (“WebSites”), collectively referred to as the (“System”). 2.2 Professionalism Paymentus shall perform in a professional manner all Services required to be performed under this Agreement. 3 Compensation 3.1 No Cost Installation Paymentus will charge no fees related to the initial setup and personalization of its standard service for both Web and IVR interfaces. 3.2 Paymentus Service Fee For each payment, Paymentus will charge a Paymentus Service Fee as per Schedule A (hereinafter called “Paymentus Service Fee”). For each payment, the Paymentus Service Fee collected will be used to pay the corresponding Credit Card transaction fees or transaction fees associated with Debit Cards or eChecks (hereinafter called “Transaction Fees”) except for the return items (eCheck returns or Credit/Debit Card chargebacks). A schedule of Paymentus Service Fee is attached hereto as Schedule A. The Paymentus Service Fee is based on the Average Bill Amount, current payment method mix (credit vs debit vs e- check) and on the assumption that the total number of payments and the total Payment Amount collected each month from the use of non-consumer cards shall be under 5% of the total per month (“Fee Assumptions”). Client shall be billed an additional Paymentus Service Fees based on the rate of 3.5% of the Payment Amount for any excess amount if the Fee Assumptions vary by more than 5%. Paymentus can amend this schedule upon prior written notice to the Client, if such change is required due to changes in the Visa and MasterCard regulations or changes in Credit Card fees or changes in the Average Bill Amount or changes in Fee Assumptions. Master Services Agreement – Absorbed Page 3 of 7 100205 4 Payment Processing 4.1 Integration with Client’s Billing System At no cost to Client, Paymentus will develop one (1) file format interface with Client’s billing system using Client’s existing text file format currently used to post payments to Client’s billing system. Client will be responsible to provide Paymentus with the one file format specification and will fully cooperate with Paymentus during the development of the said interface. If Client chooses to create an automated file integration process to download the posting file, due to Paymentus security requirements, Client will use Paymentus specified integration process. 4.2 Explicit User Confirmation Paymentus shall confirm the dollar amount of all Payments and the corresponding Paymentus Service Fee to be charged to a Card and electronically obtain the User approval of such charges prior to initiating Card authorizations transaction. Paymentus will provide User with electronic confirmation of all transactions. 4.3 Merchant Account Paymentus will arrange for the Client to have a merchant account with the Paymentus Authorized Processor for processing and settlement of the credit card transactions. 4.4 Card Authorization For authorization purposes, Paymentus will electronically transmit all Card transactions to the appropriate Card-processing center, in real time as the transactions occur. 4.5 Settlement Paymentus together with its authorized Card processor shall forward the payment transactions and corresponding Paymentus Service Fee to the appropriate card organizations for settlement directly to the Client’s depository bank account previously designated by the Client (hereinafter the “Client Bank Account”). Paymentus will debit the Paymentus Service Fees from Client’s account on a monthly basis. Paymentus together with Paymentus Authorized Processor will continuously review its settlement and direct debit processes for its simplicity and efficiencies. Client and Paymentus agree to fully co- operate with each other if Paymentus were to change its settlement and invoicing processes. 5 General Conditions of Services 5.1 Service Reports Paymentus shall provide Client with reports summarizing use of the Services by Users for a given reporting period. 5.2 User Adoption Communication by Client Client will make Paymentus’ Services available to its residential and commercial Clients by different means of Client communication including a) through bills, invoices and other notices; b) by providing IVR and Web payment details on the Client’s website including a “Pay Now” or similar link on a mutually agreed prominent place on the web site; c) through Client’s general IVR/Phone system; and d) other channels deemed appropriate by the Client. Paymentus shall provide Client with logos, graphics and other marketing materials for Client’s use in its communications with its users regarding the Services and/or Paymentus. Both parties agree that Paymentus will be presented as a payment method option. Client will communicate Paymentus option to its end residential and commercial Clients wherever Client usually communicates its other payment methods. 5.3 Independent Contractor Client and Paymentus agree and understand that the relationship between both parties is that of an independent contractor. 5.4 Client’s Responsibilities In order for Paymentus to provide Services outlined in this Agreement, the Client shall co- operate with Paymentus by: (i) Client will enter into all applicable merchant Card or cash management agreements. (ii) For the duration of this Agreement, Client will keep a bill payment link connecting to Paymentus System at a prominent and mutually agreed location on the Client website. The phone number for the IVR payment will also be added to the web site. Client Master Services Agreement – Absorbed Page 4 of 7 100205 will also add the IVR payment option as part of the Client’s general phone system. (iii) User Adoption marketing as described in 5.2. (iv) Within 30 days of the merchant account setup, Client will launch the service to the Users. (v) For the purpose of providing Client a posting file for posting to Client’s billing system, Client will provide the file format specification currently used to post its payments to the billing system. Client will fully cooperate with Paymentus and provide the information required to integrate with Client’s billing system. 6 Governing Laws This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the state of Minnesota. 7 Communications 7.1 Authorized Representative Each party shall designate an individual to act as a representative for the respective party, with the authority to transmit instructions and receive information. The parties may from time to time designate other individuals or change the individuals. 7.2 Notices All notices of any type hereunder shall be in writing and shall be given by Certified Mail or by a national courier or by hand delivery to an individual authorized to receive mail for the below listed individuals, all to the following individuals at the following locations: To Client C/O: Address: Phone: Fax: To Paymentus C/O: President and CEO Address: 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place Suite 450 Charlotte, NC 28277 Phone: 888-212-2027 Fax: 704-322-3776 Notices shall be declared to have been given or received on the date the notice is physically received if given by hand delivery, or if notices given by US Post, then notice shall be deemed to have been given upon on date said notice was deposited in the mail addressed in the manner set forth above. Any party hereto by giving notice in the manner set forth herein may unilaterally change the name of the person to whom notice is to be given or the address at which the notice is to be received. 7.3 Interpretation It is the intent of the parties that no portion of this Agreement shall be interpreted more harshly against either of the parties as the drafter. 7.4 Amendment of Agreement Modifications or changes in this Agreement must be in writing and executed by the parties bound to this Agreement. 7.5 Severability If a word, sentence or paragraph herein shall be declared illegal, unenforceable, or unconstitutional, the said word, sentence or paragraph shall be severed from this Agreement, and this Agreement shall be read as if said word, sentence or paragraph did not exist. 7.6 Attorney’s Fees Should any litigation arise concerning this Agreement between the parties hereto, the parties agree to bear their own costs and attorney’s fees. 7.7 Confidentiality To the extent permitted by law, Client will not disclose to any third party or use for any purpose inconsistent with this Agreement any confidential or proprietary non-public information it obtains during the term of this Agreement about Paymentus’ business, operations, financial condition, technology, systems, no-how, products, services, suppliers, Clients, marketing data, plans, and models, and personnel. Paymentus will not disclose to any third party or use for any purpose inconsistent with this Agreement any confidential User information it receives in connection with its performance of the services. Master Services Agreement – Absorbed Page 5 of 7 100205 7.8 Intellectual Property In order that the Client may promote the Services and Paymentus’ role in providing the Services, Paymentus grants to Client a revocable, non-exclusive, royalty-free, license to use Paymentus’ logo and other service marks (the “Paymentus Marks”) for such purpose only. Client does not have any right, title, license or interest, express or implied in and to any object code, software, hardware, trademarks, service mark, trade name, formula, system, know-how, telephone number, telephone line, domain name, URL, copyright image, text, script (including, without limitation, any script used by Paymentus on the IVR or the WebSite) or other intellectual property right of Paymentus (“Paymentus Intellectual Property”). All Paymentus Marks, Paymentus Intellectual Property, and the System and all rights therein (other than rights expressly granted herein) and goodwill pertain thereto belong exclusively to Paymentus. 7.9 Force Majeure Paymentus will be excused from performing the Services as contemplated by this Agreement to the extent its performance is delayed, impaired or rendered impossible by acts of God or other events that are beyond Paymentus’ reasonable control and without its fault or judgment, including without limitation, natural disasters, war, terrorist acts, riots, acts of a governmental entity (in a sovereign or contractual capacity), fire, storms, quarantine restrictions, floods, explosions, labor strikes, labor walk-outs, extra-ordinary losses utilities (including telecommunications services), external computer “hacker” attacks, and/or delays of common carrier. 7.10 Time of the Essence Paymentus and Client acknowledge and agree that time is of the essence for the completion of the Services to be performed and each parties respective obligations under this Agreement. 8 Indemnification 8.1 Paymentus Indemnification and Hold Harmless Paymentus agrees to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Client and its governing officials, agents, employees, and attorneys (collectively, the “Client Indemnitees”) from and against all liabilities, demands, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs), incurred by any Client Indemnitee as a result or arising out of (i) the willful misconduct or negligence of Paymentus in performing the Services or (ii) a material breach by Paymentus of its covenants. 8.2 Client Indemnification and Hold Harmless Subject to the limitations and immunities in Minnesota Statute Chapter 466, Client agrees to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless Paymentus, its affiliates, officers, directors, stockholders, agents, employees, and representatives, (collectively, the “Paymentus Indemnitees”) from and against all liabilities, demands, losses, damages, costs or expenses (including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees and expenses) incurred by any Paymentus Indemnitee as a result or arising out of (i) the willful misconduct or negligence of Client related to the Services or (ii) a material breach of Client’s covenants. 8.3 Warranty Disclaimer Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, Paymentus disclaims all other representations or warranties, express or implied, made to the Client or any other person, including without limitation, any warranties regarding quality, suitability, merchantability, fitness, for a particular purpose or otherwise of any services or any good provided incidental to the Services provided under this Agreement. 8.4 Limitation of Liability Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree that neither party shall be liable to the other for any lost profits, lost savings or other special, indirect or consequential damages, even if the party has been advised of or could have foreseen the possibility of such damages. Paymentus’ total liability for damages for any and all actions associated with this Agreement or the Services shall in no event exceed the specific dollar amount of the Paymentus Service Fee paid to Paymentus for the particular payment transaction which is the subject matter of the claim of damage. The preceding limitation does not apply to third party claims for which the liability shall be $1,500,000. Master Services Agreement – Absorbed Page 6 of 7 100205 9 Term and Termination 9.1 Term The term of this Agreement shall commence on the effective date of this Agreement and continue for a period of 5 (five) years (“Initial Term”) from the Launch Date. Services under this Agreement shall begin within 30 days of the merchant account setup. At the end of the Initial Term, this Agreement will automatically renew for successive three (3) year periods unless either Client or Paymentus provide the other party with not less than 6 (six) months prior written notice before such automatic renewal date that such party elects not to automatically renew the term of this Agreement. 9.2 Material Breach A material breach of this Agreement shall be cured within 90 (ninety) days (“Cure Period”) after a party notifies the other of such breach. In the event, such material breach has not been cured within the Cure Period, the non-breaching party can terminate this Agreement by providing the other party with a 30 (thirty) days notice. 9.3 Upon Termination Upon termination of this Agreement, the parties agree to cooperate with one another to ensure that all Payments are accounted for and all refundable transactions have been completed. Upon termination, Paymentus shall cease all Services being provided hereunder unless otherwise directed by the Client in writing. Master Services Agreement – Absorbed Page 7 of 7 100205 Schedule A – Paymentus Service Fee Schedule Paymentus Service Fee charged to the Client will be based on the following model: Absorbed Fee Model Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Robert C. Wilson, City Assessor Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2015-122: Approving Deferral of Special Assessments Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2015-122 Approving Deferral of Special Assessments INTRODUCTION: State Statutes and City policy allow for the deferment of special assessments for property owners who meet the required eligibility standards and complete an application. Three applications for deferment have been received and a resolution has been prepared. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2015-122: Approving Deferral of Special Assessments RESOLUTION NO. 2015 - 122 APPROVING DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, certain applications and authorization for deferral of special assessments have been received by the City of Edina from citizens seeking to have the special assessments for their properties deferred as allowed by provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council: 1. The following applications satisfy the criteria for deferral of special assessments and are hereby granted: PID PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS LEVY NO. 07-028-24-41-0082 Joan Zimmerman 4201 Alden Dr 19129 20-028-24-34-0037 Francis C Herring 6025 York Ave S 19133 20-028-24-34-0074 Mary Ann Phillips 6008 Zenith Ave S 19133 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of December, 2015 ATTEST: ___________________________ __________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 1, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of _________________ , 20___. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:2016 Board/Commission Applicant Interview Dates Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve special council meeting schedule for the purpose of interviewing candidates for Boards and Commissions. INTRODUCTION: The dates selected are: 1. Monday, January 25 5:30 - 9:30 PM 2. Thursday, February 4 5:30 PM - 9:30 PM 3. Tuesday, February 9 5:30 PM - 9:30 PM 4. Thursday, February 11 5:30 PM - 9:30 PM Interviews will begin at 5:30 and dinner will be available for council members at 5:00 pm. Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kay McAloney, Human Resources Director Item Activity: Subject:Local 49 2016-2017 Bargaining Unit Contract Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of the 2016 - 2017 Labor Contract for IUOE Local 49: Public Services Workers INTRODUCTION: The tentative agreement for this bargaining unit includes the following substantive changes from the previous contract: A two-year agreement (2016 - 2017) A 2.5% increase effective 1-1-2016, a 3.0% increase effective 1-1-2017 Language changes to clarify existing practices Establish a Pilot On-Call Program to better respond to after-hours incidents ATTACHMENTS: Description Tentative Agreement 2014-2015 Local 49 Contract Page 1 of 3 Tentative Agreement City of Edina and Local 49: Public Service Workers October 23, 2015 1) ARTICLE 14.1 and 14.2 – Sick Leave with Pay Delete all language in 14.1 and 14.2. Replace with the following language. 14.1 Employees will accrue sick leave with pay at a rate of one (1) day per month. Employees will be allowed to use sick leave during probation. 14.1 Full-time employees shall accrue sick leave, with pay, at the rate of eight (8) hours per month. 14.2 Purpose. Sick leave with pay may be granted to employees entitled thereto when the employee is unable to perform scheduled work duties due to illness/disability, the necessity for medical, dental or chiropractic care, childbirth or pregnancy disability, exposure to contagious disease where such exposure may endanger the health of others with whom the employee would come in contact in the course of performing work duties. Sick leave with pay may also be granted for a variety of other family and medical circumstances. The amount and conditions under which sick leave with pay may be used for such circumstances is provided in the family and medical leave policy adopted pursuant to Subsection 150.13 of this code. Bereavement Leave. Sick Leave with pay may be granted for a maximum of five (5) days in the event of the death of an employee's spouse, father, mother, spouse's father or mother, child or stepchild, and a maximum of three (3) days in the event of the death of an employee's grandparent, grandchild, brother or sister. One (1) day of sick leave will be granted in the event of death of a brother-in-law or sister-in-law. 14.2 Paid sick leave may be used as defined in the City’s personnel policies/Employee Handbook. 2) ARTICLE 14.8 – Payout of Sick Leave at Termination Regular full-time employees who have sick leave benefits and leave the City in good standing after a minimum of five (5) years of full-time employment or who were employed by the City prior to January 1, 2016 and leave in good standing, Upon separation from regular full-time employment with the City, an eligible employee shall receive a lump sum payment equal to 50% of his or her accrued and unused sick leave as of the date of separation. The maximum number of hours subject to this payment shall not exceed 960 hours, (i.e. 1,920 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50% = 960 hours). The payment shall be based upon the employee's rate of pay at the time of separation. The payment shall be made within 30 days of separation. Page 2 of 3 3) Article 17 – Holidays 17.1 The following legal holidays will be observed as paid holidays: • New Year’s Day …………… …….. January 1st • Martin Luther King Day ……… ….. 3rd Monday in January • President’s Day ……………………. 3rd Monday in February • Memorial Day ……………………… Last Monday in May • Independence Day …………………. July 4th • Labor Day …………………………. 1st Monday in September • Veteran’s Day ……………………… November 11th • Thanksgiving Day …………………. 4th Thursday in November • Day after Thanksgiving Day ………. 4th Friday in November • ½ Day Christmas Eve Day ………… December 24th • Christmas Day ……………………… December 25th • ½ Day New Year’s Eve …………… . December 31st • Floating Holiday 17.2 Except for Christmas Eve, when a paid holiday falls on a non-scheduled work day, the regular scheduled work day closest to the holiday shall be observed as the holiday. If Christmas Eve falls on a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, full-time employees will receive an additional floating holiday in lieu of the Christmas Eve holiday for that year. 17.3 One-half (1/2) day on Christmas Eve and one-half (1/2) day on New Year's Eve shall be paid holidays whenever they fall on one of the days Monday through Thursday. Effective January 1, 2016 New Year’s Eve is no longer a paid City Holiday. On New Year’s Eve, employees will be paid two times the regular rate of pay described in 10.6 only if called in outside of regularly scheduled hours. 17.4 Effective January 1, 2000, Columbus Day is dropped from the list of holidays in exchange for one (1) floating Holiday. 4) MOU – Central Pension Fund This Memorandum will remain in effect from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. As of January 1, 2018, this Memo may be extended, modified, or eliminated at either party’s request. 5) MOU – CDL This Memorandum will remain in effect from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. As of January 1, 2018, this Memo may be extended, modified, or eliminated at either party’s request. 6) MOU – Health Care Savings Plan Page 3 of 3 This Memorandum will remain in effect from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017. As of January 1, 2018, this Memo may be extended, modified, or eliminated at either party’s request. 7) MOU – Career Development Program – change to Step 6 This MOU will be discontinued effective December 31, 2015 as it is now Appendix A-3 – CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. 8) MOU – Pilot Program for On-Call Pay The city will enter into a new MOU with the following language, MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING On-Call Pilot Program (excluding Utilities Division) 1. The City and Local 49 are establishing a pilot on-call program. 2. There must be a minimum of twelve (12) Local 49 employees volunteer to sign up for pilot, in order for it to be implemented. 3. This Pilot Program is for up to a 12-month period, from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016. 4. When an employee is assigned to be on-call week nights, Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays, apart from the employee regularly scheduled shift, the employee shall be paid $40 per week night (after employees’ regular scheduled shift Monday through Friday) and $80 per 24-hour shift on Saturdays, Sundays or Holidays. Article 10 and 11 will apply for any work that requires the employee to report to the City Public Works Facility or other City facilities. 5. The Program may be extended for the life of the contract if both parties agree by the end of the Pilot period. 9) ARTICLE 34 – DURATION January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017 10) APPENDIX A-1 – Wages & APPENDIX A-4 – Career Development Program 2.5% increase to all steps and classifications 1-1-2016. 3.0% increase to all steps and classifications 1-1-2017. LABOR AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF EDINA and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL No. 49 AFL-CIO JANUARY 1, 2014 to DECEMBER 31, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE PAGE 1. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT 1 2. RECOGNITION 1 3. UNION SECURITY 2 4. EMPLOYER SECURITY 2 5. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 2 6. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 3 7. DEFINITIONS 5 8. SAVINGS CLAUSE 6 9. WORK SCHEDULES 6 10. OVERTIME PAY 6 11. CALL BACK 7 12. SCHEDULED UTILITY SYSTEM MONITORING 7 13. VACATION LEAVE WITH PAY 7 14. SICK LEAVE WITH PAY 9 15. LEAVE WITHOUT PAY 10 16. SEVERANCE PAY 10 17. HOLIDAYS 11 18. RESIGNATIONS 12 19. USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES 12 20. UNIFORMS 12 21. TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 13 Article Page 22. NON-DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM 14 23. WAGE RATES 14 24. LEGAL DEFENSE 14 25. RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT 14 26. DISCIPLINE 14 27. SENIORITY 14 28. PROBATIONARY PERIODS 15 29. SAFETY 15 30. JOB POSTING 15 31. INSURANCE 16 32. INJURY ON DUTY [IOD] 16 33. WAIVER 16 34. DURATION 17 SIGNATURE PAGE 17 APPENDIX A-1 WAGES [2014 — 2015] 19 APPENDIX A-2 SEASONAL EMPLOYEES 21 APPENDIX A-4 CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.... 23 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING — Central Pension Fund. 27 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING — Commercial Drivers License 29 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING — Healthcare Savings Plan 31 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING — Career Development Change to Step 6 33 -page intentionally left blank- LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL No. 49 AFL-CIO ARTICLE 1- PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Edina hereinafter called the EMPLOYER, and Local No. 49, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, hereinafter called the UNION. The intent and purpose of this AGREEMENT is to: 1.1 Establish certain hours, wages and other conditions of employment; 1.2 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement. 1.3 Specify the full and complete understanding of the parties; and 1.4 Place in written form the parties' agreement upon terms and conditions of employment for the duration of this AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the UNION, through this AGREEMENT, continue their dedication to the highest quality of public service. Both parties recognize this AGREEMENT as a pledge of this dedication. ARTICLE 2- RECOGNITION The EMPLOYER recognizes the UNION as the exclusive representative for all employees in the job classifications listed below who are public employees within the meaning of Minn Stat. §179A.03, Subdivision 14 excluding supervisory, confidential and all other employees: • Environmental Specialist • Park Keeper III • Park Keeper II • Park Keeper I • Utility Specialist • Utility II • Utility I 1 • Mechanic • Mechanic Specialist • Heavy Equipment Operator • Equipment Operator • Carpenter — Mason Specialist • Electrician/ Electronic Specialist III • Electrical Maintenance Communications/ HVAC Specialist II • Electrical Maintenance Communications/ HVAC Specialist I • Laborer • Traffic Control Specialist • Paving/ Seal Coat Specialist ARTICLE 3 - UNION SECURITY In recognition of the UNION as the exclusive representative the EMPLOYER shall: 3.1 Deduct each payroll period an amount sufficient to provide the payment of dues established by the UNION from the wages of all employees authorizing in writing such deduction, and 3.2 Remit such deduction to the appropriate designated officer of the UNION. 3.3 The UNION may designate certain employees from the bargaining unit to act as stewards and shall inform the EMPLOYER in writing of such choice. 3.4 The UNION agrees to indemnify and hold the EMPLOYER harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgments brought or issued against the City as a result of any action taken or not taken by the City under the provisions of this Article. ARTICLE 4 - EMPLOYER SECURITY The UNION agrees that during the life of this AGREEMENT it will not cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slow down, other interruption of or interference with the normal functions of the EMPLOYER. ARTICLE 5- EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The EMPLOYER retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules; and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this AGREEMENT. 5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this AGREEMENT shall remain solely within the discretion of the EMPLOYER to modify, establish or eliminate. 2 ARTICLE 6 - EMPLOYEE RIGHTS — GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 6.1 Definition of a Grievance A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. 6.2 Union Representatives The EMPLOYER will recognize REPRESENTATIVES designated by the UNION as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The UNION shall notify the EMPLOYER in writing of the names of such UNION REPRESENTATIVES and of their successors when so designated. 6.3 Processing of a Grievance It is recognized and accepted by the UNION and the EMPLOYER that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the employees and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved employee and the UNION REPRESENTATIVE shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the EMPLOYER during normal working hours provided the employee and the UNION REPRESENTATIVE have notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the EMPLOYER. 6.4 Procedure Grievances, as defined by Section 6.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Step 1. An employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this AGREEMENT shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the employee's supervisor as designated by the EMPLOYER. The EMPLOYER-designated representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the AGREEMENT allegedly violated, the remedy requested and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the EMPLOYER-designated representative's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 2 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER-designated Step 2 representative. The EMPLOYER-designated representative shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER-designated representative's final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not 3 appealed in writing to Step 3 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the EMPLOYER-designated Step 3 representative. The EMPLOYER-designated representative shall give the UNION the EMPLOYER'S answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER-designated representative's final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 shall be submitted to the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services (BMS) for mediation. A grievance not resolved in Step 4 may be appealed to Step 5 within ten (10) calendar days following the EMPLOYER'S final answer at Step 4. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 5 by the UNION within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 5. A grievance unresolved in Step 4 and appealed in Step 5 shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971, as amended. If the parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, the selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the BMS. 6.5 Arbitrator's Authority A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the EMPLOYER and the UNION, and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the EMPLOYER and the UNION and shall be based solely on the arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this AGREEMENT and to the facts of the grievance presented. C. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the EMPLOYER and the UNION provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings the cost shall be shared equally. 4 6.6 Waiver If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered "waived." If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the EMPLOYER'S last answer. If the EMPLOYER does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the UNION may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the EMPLOYER and the UNION. 6.7 Choice of Remedy If, as a result of the EMPLOYER response in Step 4, the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either to Step 5 of Article VI or a procedure such as: Civil Service, Veteran's Preference, or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 5 of Article VI the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 5 of Article VI. The aggrieved employee shall indicate in writing which procedure is to be utilized — Step 5 of Article VI or another appeal procedure — and shall sign a statement to the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved employee from making a subsequent appeal through Step 5 of Article 6. ARTICLE 7- DEFINITIONS 7.1 Union: The International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49, AFL-CIO. 7.2 Employer: The City of Edina. 7.3 Union Member: A member of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49, AFL-CIO. 7.4 Employee: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 7.5 Base Pay Rate: The employee's hourly pay rate exclusive of longevity or any other special allowance. 7.6 Seniority: Length of continuous service in any of the job classifications covered by Article 2 — RECOGNITION. Employees who are promoted from a job classification covered by this AGREEMENT and return to a job classification covered by this AGREEMENT shall have their seniority calculated on their length of service under this AGREEMENT for the purposes of promotion, transfer and lay off and total length of service with the EMPLOYER for other benefits under this AGREEMENT. 7.7 Severance Pay: Payment made to an employee upon honorable termination of employment. 5 7.8 Overtime: Work performed at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER in excess of either eight (8) hours within a twenty-four (24) hour period (except for shift changes) or more than forty (40) hours within a seven (7) day period. 7.9 Call Back: Return of an employee to a specified work site to perform assigned duties at the express authorization of the EMPLOYER at a time other than an assigned shift. An extension of or early report to an assigned shift is not a call back. ARTICLE 8- SAVINGS CLAUSE This AGREEMENT is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota, and the signed municipality. In the event any provision of this AGREEMENT shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions of this AGREEMENT shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provisions may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. ARTICLE 9 - WORK SCHEDULES 9.1 The sole authority in work schedules is the EMPLOYER. The normal work day for an employee shall be eight (8) hours. The normal work week shall be forty (40) hours Monday through Friday. 9.2 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular shifts for some employees on a daily, weekly, seasonal, or annual basis other than the normal work day. The EMPLOYER will give seven (7) days advance notice to the employees affected by the establishment of work days different from the employee's normal eight (8) hour work day. 9.3 In the event that work is required because of unusual circumstances such as (but not limited to) fire, flood, snow, sleet, or breakdown of municipal equipment or facilities, no advance notice need be given. It is not required that an employee working other than the normal work day be scheduled to work more than eight (8) hours, however, each employee has an obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee from so working. 9.4 Service to the public may require the establishment of regular work weeks that schedule work on Saturdays and/or Sundays. ARTICLE 10- OVERTIME PAY 10.1 Hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours within a twenty-four (24) hour period (except for shift changes) or more than forty (40) hours within a seven (7) day period will be compensated for at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate. 10.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable. For the purposes of this section, overtime totals will be zeroed out at the end of the last pay period of every even- numbered year. 6 10.3 Under Article 10.2, overtime opportunities not worked by employees will be recorded as not worked. 10.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded, or paid twice for the same hours worked. 10.5 When employee exceeds fourteen (14) hours continuous service, all hours in excess of fourteen (14) will be paid at twice the base rate. 10.6 All overtime work performed by employees between the hours of 12:00 A.M. and 11:59 P.M. on New Year's Day, the Fourth of July, Labor Day, Christmas Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve will be paid two times the regular rate of pay. ARTICLE 11 - CALL BACK An employee called in for work at a time other than the employee's normal scheduled shift will be compensated for a minimum of two (2) hours' pay at one and one-half (11/2) times the employee's base pay rate. Early reporting or extension of regularly scheduled work shall not qualify for the call back minimum. ARTICLE 12- SCHEDULED UTILITY SYSTEM MONITORING 12.1 When assigned by the EMPLOYER to perform utility system monitoring and operations activities from a remote location on week nights, Saturdays, Sundays or Holidays, apart from the employee regularly scheduled shift, the employee shall be paid $70 per week night (3:30 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. — Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday) and $140 per 24-hour day on Saturday, Sunday, or Holidays (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m.) as system monitoring and operations pay. Article 10 & 11 will apply for any work that requires the employee to report to the City Public Works Facility or other City facilities. ARTICLE 13- VACATION LEAVE WITH PAY 13.1 Amount. The following accrual schedule shall apply to eligible employees: 1-5 continuous years of regular full-time employment 6-10 continuous years of regular full-time employment 11-15 continuous years of regular full-time employment 16 continuous years of regular 3.076 hours per pay period (10 days per year) 4.61 hours per pay period (15 days per year) An additional .307 hours per pay period or one (1) additional day of vacation for each additional year of service to 15 years of service. (Total at 15 years of service —20 days per year). 6.154 hours per pay period 7 full-time employment 17 years or more of continuous service of regular full-time employment (20 days per year) An additional .307 hours per pay period or one (1) additional day of vacation for a total of twenty-one (21) days of vacation per year. 13.2 Conditions Affecting Accrual of Vacation — Although leaves of absence, under Section 12 of the City's ordinance, do not affect the continuous years of service, for the purpose of determining accrual rates, vacation shall not accrue during leaves of absence under said Section 12. 13.3 When Taken. Vacation leave may be used as earned, subject to the approval of the department heads to the time at which it is taken. 13.4 Maximum Annual Carry Forward Effective 1-1-13, employees will be able to accrue a maximum of 480 hours of vacation leave. Once the maximum level of vacation is reached, additional leave will not be accrued until the balance falls below the maximum accrual level. Unused vacation leave up to the maximum balance of 480 hours will be paid to employees who leave in good standing upon termination of employment. Transition to New Cap In November, 2012, employees who have more than the maximum accrual will be allowed to cash out up to 80 hours of vacation at the current base rate of pay. In January, 2013 any amount of vacation over 200 hours will be placed into an "Excess Vacation Accrual Account" (EVAA). This is a one-time transfer. Employees will not be able to add any vacation to the EVAA after January, 2013. The balance in the EVAA will be reflected on the employee's pay stub and can be used in the following ways: o Vacation or sick leave in one-hour increments. o In November of each year, employees will have the option of cashing out up to 40 hours of vacation leave at their current base rate of pay. The City Manager may allow a higher number for all employees, based on city finances. o Any remaining balance at termination will be cashed out at the current base rate of pay for employees who leave in good standing. 13.5 Accrual During Leave. An employee using earned vacation or sick leave shall accrue vacation and sick leave during such use. 13.6 Vacation Donation. Any employee can donate up to two (2) days of accrued vacation leave to an individual who is out of sick leave and vacation leave. Every hour of vacation donated equals one hour of vacation for the recipient, regardless of hourly rate. Vacation 8 must be donated in one-day increments (8 hours or 16 hours). The donation is irrevocable. 13.7 New Employees. The first year of employment, new employees will be allowed to carry a negative balance of vacation to a maximum of -80 hours. ARTICLE 14- SICK LEAVE WITH PAY 14.1 Employees will accrue sick leave with pay at a rate of one (1) day per month. Employees will be allowed to use sick leave during probation. 14.2 Purpose. Sick leave with pay may be granted to employees entitled thereto when the employee is unable to perform scheduled work duties due to illness/disability, the necessity for medical, dental or chiropractic care, childbirth or pregnancy disability, exposure to contagious disease where such exposure may endanger the health of others with whom the employee would come in contact in the course of performing work duties. Sick leave with pay may also be granted for a variety of other family and medical circumstances. The amount and conditions under which sick leave with pay may be used for such circumstances is provided in the family and medical leave policy adopted pursuant to Subsection 150.13 of this code. Bereavement Leave. Sick Leave with pay may be granted for a maximum of five (5) days in the event of the death of an employee's spouse, father, mother, spouse's father or mother, child or stepchild, and a maximum of three (3) days in the event of the death of an employee's grandparent, grandchild, brother or sister. One (1) day of sick leave will be granted in the event of death of a brother-in-law or sister-in-law. 14.3 Employees requesting sick leave shall contact the EMPLOYER or the EMPLOYER'S representative prior to the time the employee is regularly scheduled to report for duty or if unable to do so, notify him/her within the first thirty (30) minutes of the scheduled work day. 14.4 Written request for the sick leave to be used for other than personal injury or illness is to be made to the EMPLOYER'S representative prior to the using of the sick leave or the work day following the employee's return. The EMPLOYER reserves the right to verify the reported cause for the requested sick leave by such means as he/she deems necessary. 14.5 The employee, at the request of the EMPLOYER, shall provide proof of his/her physical ability to perform his/her normal duties upon his/her return from sick leave. 14.6 For employees hired prior to January 1, 2000, who choose not to participate in the City's New Severance Plan as outlined under "Policy For The Payment of Unused Sick Leave", attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. Employees will receive their birthday/ personal day off with pay provided the employee has used three (3) days or less (24 hours or less) sick leave during the previous calendar 9 year. This day off will be approved only by the department head. In addition, employees will have the option of two (2) days off with pay provided the employee has used twelve (12) hours or less of sick leave during the previous calendar year. 14.7 Any employee may donate up to four (4) days of his/her sick leave to another employee who is out of sick and vacation leave. Every two hours of sick leave donated equals one hour of sick leave for the recipient, regardless of hourly rate. Sick leave must be donated in two-day increments (either 32 hours or 16 hours). The donation is irrevocable. 14.8 Payout of Sick Leave at Termination. This policy is effective for regular full-time employees except those employees who were hired prior to January 1, 2000 and opted- out of this program in exchange for Article 16 Severance Pay. Eligible Employees Only current, regular full time employees as defined by Section 150 of the City Code who have completed their probationary period and leave employment with the City in good standing as defined by 150.16 of the Code are eligible. Payment for Unused Sick Leave Upon separation from regular full-time employment with the City, an eligible employee shall receive a lump sum payment equal to 50% of his or her accrued and unused sick leave as of the date of separation. The maximum number of hours subject to this payment shall not exceed 960 hours, (i.e. 1,920 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50% = 960 hours). The payment shall be based upon the employee's rate of pay at the time of separation. The payment shall be made within 30 days of separation. ARTICLE 15- LEAVE WITHOUT PAY 15.1 An employee may be granted leave of absence without pay or benefits on account of sickness, disability, jury duty or other good and sufficient reasons which are considered to be in the best interest of the EMPLOYER. Such leave of absence shall not exceed ninety (90) working days unless a longer period is approved by the EMPLOYER. 15.2 All leaves of absence without pay shall receive the advance approval of the EMPLOYER. 15.3 In the case the employee is called to jury duty, the employee shall receive an amount of compensation from the EMPLOYER which will equal the difference between the employee's regular pay and the compensation paid for the jury duty. ARTICLE XVI- SEVERANCE PAY This Article applies only to those employees hired before January 1, 2000, and who opted-out of the City's policy to buy back unused sick leave. 16.1 Eligible Employees 10 1. General Rule. The City shall provide severance pay only to those regular full- time employees who are no longer in their original probationary period (as contrasted with a promotional probationary period), who leave employment with the City in good standing as described in Section 16 of the City Ordinance, and whose employment ends: (i) due to total and permanent disability, as determined by PERA under PERA rules; or (ii) after completion of twenty years of continuous service to the City. 2. Special Rule. The City Manager, in his/her sole discretion, is authorized to award severance pay to any employee or group of employees in regular full-time employment who are terminated due to the effects of a permanent elimination by the City of any functions or activities of the City. 16.2 Amount. The eligible employee's severance pay shall be a lump sum amount equal to six weeks' pay. 16.3 Time. The City shall provide the severance pay on the pay day immediately following the eligible employee's severance date. For total and permanent disability, however, the City shall provide the severance pay on the pay day immediately following its receipt of appropriate notice of PERA'S determination. 16.4 Definitions. The following special definitions apply only to this section. 1. "Eligible Employee" means an employee of the City who is eligible for severance pay under 16.1 of this section. 2. "Regular Full-Time Employment" means employment with the City where the employee is regularly engaged on a minimum of 40 hours every seven day cycle, as determined by the needs and particular customs in the employee's department. 3. "Pay" means the eligible employee's regular basic salary or wage (before any payroll deductions) for regular full-time employment in effect on the severance date. 4. "PERA" means the Public Employees Retirement Association under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353 (or any subsequent amendment or replacement thereof). 5. "PERA Rules" means the requirements for payment of an annuity or benefit from PERA as of May 31, 1989, (including any changes in such requirements adopted as of that date, but effective after that date). 6. "Severance date" means the last date on which the eligible employee performs duties in full-time employment. ARTICLE 17- HOLIDAYS 17.1 The following legal holidays will be observed as paid holidays: 11 • New Year's Day January 1st • Martin Luther King Day 3rd Monday in January • President's Day 3rd Monday in February • Memorial Day Last Monday in May • Independence Day July 4th • Labor Day 1st Monday in September • Veteran's Day November 1 • Thanksgiving Day 4th Thursday in November • Day after Thanksgiving Day 4th Friday in November • 1/2 Day Christmas Eve Day December 24th • Christmas Day December 25th • 1/2 Day New Year's Eve December 31st • Floating Holiday 17.2 When a paid holiday falls on a non-scheduled work day, the regular scheduled work day closest to the holiday shall be observed as the holiday. 17.3 One-half (1/2) day on Christmas Eve and one-half (1/2) day on New Year's Eve shall be paid holidays whenever they fall on one of the days Monday through Thursday. 17.4 Effective January 1, 2000, Columbus Day is dropped from the list of holidays in exchange for one (1) floating Holiday. ARTICLE 18- RESIGNATIONS Any employee wishing to terminate his/her employment with the EMPLOYER in good standing shall file a written resignation with the EMPLOYER at least fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the termination date. Failure by the employee to file said resignation within the required fourteen (14) day period may be considered just cause for the EMPLOYER to deny future employment and severance pay to the employee. Unauthorized absence from work for a period of three (3) consecutive working days may be considered by the EMPLOYER as a resignation by the employee. ARTICLE 19- USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES City tools, equipment and facilities are to be used only for official business unless specifically authorized by the EMPLOYER as a condition of the employee's employment. ARTICLE 20- UNIFORMS 20.1 The EMPLOYER shall provide eleven (11) uniforms and two (2) work jackets or equivalent clothing program equal to $500.00 funding level for each employee, subject to three conditions: (1) Employee must wear approved uniform. (2) Unifonn shirt would have City identification on it. 12 (3) Sleeved shirt and long pants are mandatory minimum uniform. 20.2 The Employer will provide up to One Hundred Seventy Five Dollars ($175) per year per employee for the purchase of safety shoes and Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.00) for safety glasses not provided in Section 20.1. ARTICLE 21- TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 21.1 The EMPLOYER encourages its employees to improve job performance in their present positions and to prepare for advancement through self-development. Towards this end, the EMPLOYER will share the cost of education which directly relates to the performance of an employee on his/her present assignment or which prepares him/her for advancement in the foreseeable future. 21.2 The Employer shall pay 100% of the initial cost of classes being taken to fulfill a Career Development requirement. At completion of the class, Employees not eligible to have received full payment in accordance with the chart below, shall have any difference owed the City withheld from their next paychecks until such amount has been fully repaid to the Employer. Employees leaving the City before class completion shall have the full amount withheld from their final paycheck. For non-Career Development class requirements, The EMPLOYER will reimburse eligible employees upon presentation of their final grades for the following: Grade of A 100% of tuition Grade of B 100% of tuition Grade of C 90% of tuition Grade of D 0% of tuition Pass/Fail 100% of tuition if passed The total amount reimbursed for both career development and non-career development courses annually will not exceed the total annual amount permitted by the IRS as an employer provided educational benefit. 21.3 Charges for books, supplies, transportation, time required to take the course and all other incidental expenses shall be borne by the employee. 21.4 Courses paid for in full under the G.I. Bill or other Federal, State, or private funds are not eligible for tuition reimbursement. Courses paid for by other than EMPLOYER funds which exceed the percentages of reimbursement designated in 21.2 are not eligible for EMPLOYER tuition reimbursement. Courses paid for by other than EMPLOYER funds, but not equal to the percentages designated in 21.2 are eligible for the EMPLOYER tuition reimbursement in the amount of the difference between the funds provided and the percentages designated in 21.2. 21.5 To become eligible for tuition reimbursement, the employee must: (a) Have satisfactorily completed one years' service. 13 (b) Received approval of the course at the particular school from the EMPLOYER prior to the commencement of the course. ARTICLE 22- NON-DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM 22.1 It is agreed by the City and the UNION that both parties shall provide the equal employment opportunities and membership in the UNION without regard for race, color, religion, national origin, political affiliation, disability, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, sex, age or criminal record. ARTICLE 23- WAGE RATES 23.1 See Job Classifications and Wage Rates in Appendix "A-1". ARTICLE 24- LEGAL DEFENSE 24.1 Employees involved in litigation because of negligence, ignorance of laws, non- observance of laws, or as a result of employee judgmental decision may not receive legal defense by the municipality. 24.2 Any employee who is charged with a traffic violation, ordinance violation or criminal offense arising from acts performed within the scope of the employee's employment, when such act is performed in good faith and under direct order of the employee's supervisor, shall be reimbursed for reasonable attorney's fees and court costs actually incurred by such employee in defending against such charge. ARTICLE 25- RIGHT OF SUBCONTRACT Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall prohibit or restrict the right of the EMPLOYER from subcontracting work performed by employees covered by this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 26- DISCIPLINE 26.1 The EMPLOYER will discipline employees only for just cause. 26.2 After four years of employment, the EMPLOYER will annually review an employee's personnel file. The EMPLOYER will not consider for discipline purposes employee's personnel record, letters and other written documents that relate to reprimand and commendations; and all such documents that are older than three (3) years. 26.2 The EMPLOYER will not conduct an investigatory interview with an employee where the information from the interview could lead to disciplinary action against the employee without the employee being given the right to have a third party or Union Representative present at the interview. ARTICLE 27- SENIORITY 14 27.1 Seniority will be the determining criterion for transfers, promotions and lay-offs only when all job-relevant qualification factors are equal. 27.2 Seniority will be the determining criterion for recall when the job-relevant qualification factors are equal. Recall rights under this provision will continue for twenty-four (24) months after lay-off. Recalled employees shall have ten (10) working days after notification of recall by registered mail at the employee's last known address to report to work or forfeit all recall rights. ARTICLE 28- PROBATIONARY PERIODS 28.1 All newly hired or rehired employees will serve a twelve (12) months' probationary period. 28.2 All employees will serve a twelve (12) months' probationary period in any job classification in which the employee has not served a probationary period. 28.3 At any time during the probationary period a newly hired or rehired employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. 28.4 At any time during the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee may be demoted or reassigned to the employee's previous position at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. ARTICLE 29- SAFETY The EMPLOYER and the UNION agree to jointly promote safe and healthful working conditions, to cooperate in safety matters and to encourage employees to work in a safe manner Employees will wear safety equipment that is provided by the City during applicable situations. ARTICLE 30- JOB POSTING 30.1 The EMPLOYER and the UNION agree that permanent job vacancies within the designated bargaining unit shall be filled based on the concept of promotion from within provided that applicants: 30.11 have the necessary qualifications to meet the standards of the job vacancy; and 30.12 have the ability to perform the duties and responsibilities of the job vacancy. 30.2 Employees filling a higher job class based on the provisions of this Article shall be subject to the conditions of Article 28 [PROBATIONARY PERIOD]. 30.3 The EMPLOYER has the right to final decision in the selection of employees to fill posted jobs based on qualifications, abilities and experience. Whenever all job relevant qualifications, abilities and experience are equal, then seniority will prevail. 15 30.4 Job vacancies within the designated bargaining unit will be posted for five (5) working days so that members of the bargaining unit can be considered for such vacancies. ARTICLE 31- INSURANCE The EMPLOYER will provide the same employer contribution to the City's cafeteria plan as is given to all non-union City employees. ARTICLE 32- INJURY ON DUTY ROD] Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the EMPLOYER and thereby rendered unable to work for the EMPLOYER may choose to be paid the difference between the employee's normal net take home pay (i.e., regular salary less mandatory deductions) and Worker's Compensation Insurance payments for a period not to exceed ninety (90) working days, charged to the employee's sick leave, vacation, or other accumulated benefits. Such injury-on-duty pay shall be granted only to employees certified by the Worker's Compensation carrier as being incapacitated as a result of injury incurred through no misconduct of their own while on the actual performance of City assigned duties and only during the period they remain so certified. The City Manager shall have the discretion to require an injured employee to submit to a medical examination by competent medical authority approved by the City to determine if the employee is capable and qualified to return to any assigned City duties commensurate with his/her capabilities. To qualify for such compensation an employee shall comply with all requirements of the Minnesota Worker's Compensation Law. ARTICLE 33- WAIVER 33.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this AGREEMENT, are hereby superseded. 33.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations which resulted in this AGREEMENT, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any terms or conditions of employment not removed by law from bargaining All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this AGREEMENT for the stipulated duration of this AGREEMENT. The EMPLOYER and the UNION each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all Walls and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this AGREEMENT or with respect to any term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered by this AGREEMENT, even though such terms or conditions may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed. 16 Rei r, St ward --Any Stevi, Hamer, S -e-ar tvorst, teward ARTICLE 34- DURATION This AGREEMENT shall be effective January 1, 2014, and shall remain in full force and effect until the 31St day of December, 2015. [7TJNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT on this JSJ r\ day of , 2014. FOR THE INT'L UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 4' FOR THE CITY OF EDINA: Glen -a Glen John ,41 Business Manager Mark Pothen, A23usiness Rep. Chet Boom, Stewar eith Rischmiller, Steward 17 - page intentionally left blank- 18 CITY OF EDINA APPENDIX A-1 WAGES A. The following wage schedule will be in effect from the first payroll period in 2014 through the last payroll period in 2015: ***************************************************************************** Classification: 2% 2014 2.5% 2015 Park Department: Environmental Specialist 26.23 26.89 Park Keeper III 25.85 26.50 Park Keeper II 24.69 25.31 Park Keeper I 19.68 20.17 Utility: Utility Specialist (Includes HEO Ability) 26.23 26.89 Utility II 25.10 25.73 Utility I 24.69 25.31 Mechanics. Mechanic Specialist 26.23 26.89 Mechanic 25.85 26.50 Street Department: Heavy Equipment Operator 25.85 26.50 Equipment Operator 24.69 25.31 Carpenter - Mason Specialist 26.23 26.89 Electrician/Electronic Specialist III 26.23 26.89 Electrical Maintenance - Communications/HVAC Specialist II ... 25.10 25.73 Electrical Maintenance - Communications/HVAC Specialist I ... 24.69 25.31 Laborer 19.68 20.17 Traffic Control Specialist 26.23 26.89 Paving/Seal Coat Specialist 26.23 26.89 Those in Heavy Equipment Operator slots must be competent to operate all of the following equipment: Graders, Loaders with bucket capacity greater than 11/2 yards, Self- Propelled Street Sweeper exceeding 40 HP, Asphalt Rollers greater than 5 Tons, Backhoe with greater than 15' reach, and Self-Propelled Pavers or Chip Spreaders. A premium pay of $3.50 per hour will be paid to Park Maintenance employees for hours worked prior to 7:00 A.M. while engaged in regularly scheduled ice rink maintenance To be eligible for 19 this premium pay an employee must work a full eight (8) hour day. If an employee uses sick leave they are exempt from premium pay. Premium pay will not be paid during overtime worked. Premium Pay — Snow and Ice Emergency Pay. A premium pay of $3.50 per hour will be paid to Public Works and Park Maintenance employees for hours worked prior to the start of the regularly scheduled shift while engaged in emergency snow and ice control. To be eligible for this premium pay an employee must work a full eight (8) hour day. If an employee uses sick leave they are exempt from premium pay. Premium pay will not be paid during overtime worked. There will be no pyramiding of premium pay (Intent of language is to be exactly the same as above practice in the Park Dept.). 20 CITY OF EDINA APPENDIX A-2 SEASONAL EMPLOYEES The City of Edina and I.U.O.E. Local 49 recognize the following two types of seasonal workers: Retirees of the Edina Public Works Bargaining Unit 1. Retiree Seasonal Employee: An employee who works in a position that is reasonably expected to be 163 calendar days or less within the January 1 to December 31 time period. The 163 day period starts on the first day that any Retiree Seasonal Employee starts to work. All Retiree Seasonal Employees shall be terminated from employment at the end of the initial 163 day period. During the 163 Retiree Seasonal Employment Period, no member of the bargaining unit will be laid off. The City reserves the right to lay off bargaining unit members during the 163 day period if the City has laid off all Retiree Seasonal Employees and seasonal employees. The City reserves its management right to determine the size of the work force on all cases except under the conditions of Appendix A-2. (1.a.) The 163 day period mentioned above shall be kept by each department, (i.e. Park Department Retiree Seasonal Employees get to work 163 days and Public Works Department Retiree Seasonal Employees get to work 163 days). 2. Union Security. The EMPLOYER shall deduct each payroll period an amount sufficient to provide the payment of dues established by the UNION from the wages of all Retiree Seasonal Employees authorizing in writing such deduction, or as allowed for fair share dues as provided for under PELRA, and remit such deduction to the appropriate designated officer of the UNION. 3. Rates of Pay. Retiree Seasonal Employee's rate of pay shall be in accordance with the Step 1 wage as identified in this COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT Appendix A-4 Career Development. 4. Equipment Operation. Retiree Seasonal Employees shall be allowed to operate all equipment they are qualified by the EMPLOYER and licensed by law to operate. 5. Benefits. Retiree Seasonal Employees shall not be eligible for any benefits under this AGREEMENT except those which may be required by law. 6. Overtime. No Retiree Seasonal Employee shall work any overtime unless all qualified full-time bargaining unit members have been offered first. 7. Probation Period. All newly hired or rehired Retiree Seasonal Employees will serve a probationary period for the duration of their employment up to six (6) months. 21 At any time during the probationary period, a newly hired or rehired Retiree Seasonal Employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. Summertime Seasonal Employees 1. Seasonal Employee: An employee who works in a position that is between April 1 and October 31. All seasonal employees shall be terminated from employment on October 31. During the seasonal employment period, no member of the bargaining unit will be laid off The City reserves the right to lay off bargaining unit members during the seasonal period if the City has laid off all Retiree Seasonal Employees and seasonal employees. The City reserves its management right to detettnine the size of the work force on all cases except under the conditions of Appendix A-2. No seasonal/temporary employee will operate any equipment requiring a CDL license, or any heavy equipment. No seasonal employee will operate tractors with buckets or self-propelled mowers that exceed 48" in diameter. Exceptions to equipment operation may be made in specific and individual circumstances with mutual approval of the City and Union. 2. Rates of Pay. Seasonal employees' rate of pay shall be in accordance with the seasonal/temporary pay plan established by the City Manager. 3. Benefits. Seasonal employees shall not be eligible for any benefits under this AGREEMENT except those which may be required by law. 4. Probation Period. All newly hired or rehired seasonal employees will serve a probationary period for the duration of their employment up to seven (7) months. At any time during the probationary period, a newly hired or rehired seasonal employee may be terminated at the sole discretion of the EMPLOYER. 5. Overtime. No Retiree Seasonal Employee shall work any overtime unless all qualified full-time bargaining unit members have been offered first. 6. Contract Provisions Applicable. Seasonal employees shall not be covered by those provisions of the contract relating to: • Call Back • Discipline • Seniority • Insurance 22 CITY OF EDINA APPENDIX A-3 CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM The City of Edina Career Development Program was created to provide advancement opportunities for all employees based on their performance, training, education and years of service. The program consists of 6 steps. Each step will have a certain number of requirements and associated pay. As employees advance through the steps they also increase their wages beyond what is currently available under the existing situation. An employee is not precluded from performing duties at a higher step if they are qualified. In addition, there is not a limit on the number of employees who may progress to a higher step and earn the higher wage rate available. The intent of the program is to provide the opportunity for employees to take greater ownership and responsibility for their professional development and advancement. The following items serve to clarify the Career Development Program: 1. Definitions: Division: Parks Streets Utilities Mechanics Electrical/HVAC Public Service Worker: All Local 49 Maintenance Employees Routine: A regular course of procedure 2. Step 2 is considered to be the standard or minimum step for public service workers. All Local 49 maintenance personnel need to acquire the qualifications necessary to meet the requirements of Steps 1 through 2 in order to successfully complete probation period. Steps 3, 4, 5 and 6 have been created to recognize those employees who wish to advance in their field through training and education. Employees classified in any of these advanced steps will still be required to perform day-to-day maintenance tasks. 3. Employees are required to demonstrate that they continue to successfully meet the qualifications of the previous steps prior to their receiving approval to move to the next step. The City must provide employees with the opportunity to obtain the necessary training and practice to move within the Career Development Program. Not being provided the opportunity for training and practice will not preclude an employee from moving within the program. To ensure every employee has equal access to training, 23 the employee has the right to use the dispute resolution as outlined in Number 9 of Page 2 of the Career Development Program preamble. 4. Each employee is responsible for initiating his or her progress to the next step available by submitting a written application to their immediate supervisor. Once formal application is made, the following actions will take place: A. The employee and team leader/supervisor will meet to establish a development program. It is the responsibility of the employee and team leader/supervisor exclusively to complete this step. B. Once a career development program is established, a series of meetings (2 minimum) over the projected time of the development program are required. The meetings will be to review the progress and to establish items to be accomplished prior to the next meeting. This is meant to ensure steady progress. Completion times may be adjusted by mutual agreement. C. The employee is responsible for completing the documentation (forms to be provided by the employer) regarding career development opportunities. Career development opportunities include the individual step requirements, training, and education that are specifically listed within each step. 5. The City reserves the right to place new employees within the Career Development Program based upon the needs of the City and the individual's qualifications. Regardless of what step the employee is hired at, all new employees are subject to one year probation and must meet the requirements of subsequent steps providing training is available. 6. The City reserves the right to reclassify public service workers in steps 3, 4, 5 or 6 if such employee no longer successfully fulfills the requirements of their respective step. The employee would be provided with a six month period to resolve what deficiencies exist prior to a reclassification, unless it is evident that the employee is not capable of correcting the deficiency, in which case the employee will be subject to reclassification. The team leader/supervisor is responsible for notifying the employee when a deficiency exists. 7. The grievance process as contained in the Labor Agreement between Local 49 and the City of Edina shall be followed for any disputes regarding any movement of public service workers. 8. The City has sole authority for determining whether an employee has qualified for advancement to the next public service worker step. The City will review the step advancement with a committee. The employee who is eligible for advancement shall have his/her program brought to a panel of three supervisors for review with the employee's team leader/supervisor. 9. A Career Development Committee would be created, as necessary, to act as a method of resolving disputes concerning the training and movement of the employees in the step 24 program. The committee will consist of two management representatives and two union representatives selected by the Labor Management Committee. 10. New equipment purchased or leased which is not listed in the Step Program shall be classified by Mutual Agreement. 11. The Business Agent and/or Steward will meet with newly hired employees during the first two weeks of employment to explain and discuss the Career Development Program and the Collective Bargaining Agreement. 12. Classes taken for steps shall be credited only for the time period that they were required — no carryover of hours. Hourly wage rates under the Career Development Program shall be as follows: 2014 2015 2% 2.5% Step 1 23.99 24.59 Step 2 25.57 26.21 Step 3 26.44 27.10 Step 4 27.81 28.51 Step 5 29.37 30.10 Step 6 30.93 31.70 25 -page intentionally left blank- 26 isa Schaefer, HR Dire Dated (1-1 CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Central Pension Fund 1. The CPF is a supplemental Pension Fund authorized by Minnesota Statutes, §356.24, subdivision 1(10). 2. The parties agree that the agreed upon amount that would otherwise be paid in salary or wages will be contributed instead to the CPF as pre-tax employer contributions. Contributions from the City will not be funded from any source other than this wage reduction. 3. The Employer shall pay this contribution directly to the I.U.O.E. Central Pension Fund at 4115 Chesapeake Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20016. 4. A contribution of $0.25 per straight time hour worked prevents any employee's annual CPF contributions from exceeding $5,000.00 in a year and, therefore, complies with limitations set forth under Minnesota Statute §356.24, subd. 1(10) as amended. 5. The parties agree that the Public Employees Retirement Association interprets Employer contributions to the CPF as being included in determining "salary" for the purposes of the public pension. 6. The CPF Plan of Benefits and the Agreement and Declaration of Trust will serve as the governing documents. 7. The City of Edina does not warrant or represent the long term financial condition of the CPF. 8. Effective 07-23-13 the contribution rate equals $$0.25 per straight time hour worked. 8. 9. Members, by majority vote, may change the contribution rate at any time during the life 9. of the agreement, accompanied by a sixty (60) day notice to the employer. The Union and the Employer will work together to implement member approved changes as soon as practicable. For IUOE, Local 49: Mark Pothen, AIR Dated r-i 27 -page intentionally left blank- 28 Edina. I Lisa S hae er, HR Diru tor (-1 For th Dated CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Commercial Driver's License The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding is to assist both Labor and Management in dealing with Commercial Driver's License (CDL) rules and the pending changes to those rules. The following conditions will apply to no more than five (5) Public Works employees in the Local 49 Bargaining Unit at any given time. Additionally, only a maximum of three (3) of the above five (5) Public Works employees may be without a Class C driver's license A. If an employee temporarily loses his/her CDL, the Employer will accommodate the employee by assigning him/her to duties that do not require a CDL, not to exceed twelve (12) months during the employee's tenure with the City, and not to exceed two (2) revocations as a result of driving violations. B. If an employee temporarily loses his/her driver's license, the Employer will accommodate the employee by assigning him/her to duties that do not require a driver's license, not to exceed six (6) months during the employee's tenure with the City, and not to exceed two (2) revocations as a result of driving violations. C. If the temporary loss of a driver's license is the result of an alcohol-related offense, the employee will be required to comply with the recommendations of a Substance Abuse Professional. Proof of compliance with the Substance Abuse Professional recommendations will be provided to the Employer. D. The application of this Agreement will begin for an individual as of the date of his/her license revocation regardless of subsequent procedures contesting the revocation. E. This Memorandum of Understanding applies to driving violations outside the workplace. F. This Memorandum of Understanding does not include positive test results from the Department of Transportation's required random testing. G. A seventeen percent (17%) decrease in pay will begin as of the revocation date. Any hourly wages not paid to an employee during the revocation of the employee's driver's license/CDL will not be reimbursed regardless of the outcome of any subsequent contesting of the revocation. This Memorandum will remain in effect from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2015. As of January 1, 2016, this Memo may be extended, modified, or eliminated at either party's request. For IU0E, Local 49: `7 #9- Mark Pothen, ABR Dated 29 -page intentionally left blank- 30 For IU0E, Local 49; Mark Pothen, ABR Dated -1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Health Care Savings Plan THE FOLLOWING AGREEMENT ADDRESSES MEMBER PARTICIPATION IN THE CITY'S HEALTH CARE SAVINGS PLAN The City of Edina and the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 49 agree that members will participate in the City's current Health Care Savings Plan outlined as follows: 1. Effective April 1, 2003, this program applies to all regular full-time employees. 2. Employees with less than five years of service do not participate in the HCSP. 3. For all employees with more than five years of service, participation in the HCSP is mandatory. 4. Employees eligible to receive a severance payment for unused sick leave at termination of employment must contribute the entire sick leave portion of their severance to the HCSP account up to a maximum of 960 hours. 5. Employees eligible to receive six weeks severance pay at termination instead of payment for sick leave must contribute the entire six weeks severance payment to their HCSP account. *********************************************************** 31 -page intentionally left blank- 32 For IU0E, Local 49; `7'1'Zece.A? Mark Pothen, BR For tjqCity o dina; Lisa Schaefer, HR Director Dated 8 Dated I CITY OF EDINA MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Career Development Program Change to Step 6 Statement of Purpose The Career Development Program was created to provide advancement opportunities for all employees based on their performance, training, education and years of services. The intent of the program is to provide the opportunity for employees to take greater ownership and responsibility for their professional development and advancement. Step 6 has been created to recognize those employees who wish to advance in their field through training and education in the area of management. Change to Requirement 2 for advancement to Step 6: Complete one-half of approved Career Development Program (i.e. North Hennepin Community College Public Works Administration Certificate program) a minimum of 11 semester credits (after hours) or approved equivalent (which would mean being registered for next class if minimum credit total was 10 credits). If the employee has previously completed the Certificate or equivalent, the employee would complete a minimum of 120 hours of Supervisor approved after-hours training. Change to Requirementl for continuing to receive Step 6 wage: Complete final one-half of approved Career Development Program within 2 years after completion of the first one-half of the program. If the employee has previously completed the Certificate or equivalent, the employee would complete a minimum of 120 hours of Supervisor approved after-hours training. The other requirements for advancing and continuing in Step 6 shall remain unchanged. Eligibility This program applies to all bargaining unit employees in the Career Development Program for the duration of this contract through December 31, 2015. 33 Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IV.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ross Bintner P.E. – Environmental Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Approve Cooperative Agreement Between Edina and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for the Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize Mayor to Sign Cooperative Agreement Between Edina and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for the Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project INTRODUCTION: In response to a petition (Resolutions 2009-09, 2009-35) by the City of Edina in 2009, Nine Mile Creek Watershed (NMCWD) has worked to design and plan a streambank stabilization project through a portion of the creek corridor. The project is also meant to compliment a project by the Three Rivers Park District to create a regional trail project. The NMCWD Administrator Kevin Bigalke has updated the Council on multiple occasions during the development of this project. A project map is available as an exhibit to the agreement. While the streambank stabilization project is authored by the NMCWD, the Cooperative Agreement spells out specific areas of cooperation and cost share by the City of Edina. These areas of cooperation include a 25% cost share by Edina for all easement and land acquisition, and a 50% share of future routine maintenance, subject to a maintenance plan and schedule that will be developed by Edina and NMCWD jointly. ATTACHMENTS: Description Agreement Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project This cooperative agreement is made by and between the City of Edina (Edina), a Minnesota municipal corporation, and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD), a watershed district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B and 103D, to achieve shared water-resource protection and improvement goals through design, construction and maintenance of the Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project. Recitals WHEREAS NMCWD has an approved water resources management plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 103B.231, that has as a primary goal the improvement of water quality in the Nine Mile Creek watershed; WHEREAS on February 18, 2009, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers conditionally accepted the petition of the City of Edina for the Edina Water Quality Improvements Project, which identified removal of sediment deposits, deadfalls and other debris from the bed of Nine Mile Creek, pond restorations, maintenance of past water-management projects such as in Bredesen Park, addition of trails along the creek and construction of ponds or proprietary storm sewer devices to enhance treatment of stormwater before it enters the creek; WHEREAS Nine Mile Creek has been designated as ‘impaired’ by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency because of excess turbidity and impaired biota, and in light of the impairments, NMCWD has focused on responding to the city’s petition first through study and development of the Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project, which is proposed to be undertaken by NMCWD to stabilize the banks of the north fork of Nine Mile Creek; provide a stable channel; repair or improve stormwater-discharge points along the creek, which will reduce sediment loading caused by bank sloughing, channel downcutting and meandering; and improve fish habitat (the Project); WHEREAS the Project will be constructed on both private property and land owned by Edina as depicted in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the Project Area), under rights secured by the parties, in part through the execution of this agreement, and NMCWD completed a phase 1 environmental site assessment in September 2013 and the scope and design of the Project exclude any property that presents a recognized environmental condition; WHEREAS Edina and NMCWD are authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 471.59 to enter into this cooperative agreement for the Project. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, EDINA AND NMCWD enter into this agreement to document their understanding as to the scope of the Project, reaffirm their commitments as to the general responsibilities of and tasks to be undertaken by the parties, dedicate the necessary rights to the November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 2 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project use of property owned by Edina for the Project, and facilitate communication and cooperation to successfully complete the Project. 1 Project. The Project is defined and specified for purposes of this cooperative agreement and the parties’ implementation thereof as consisting of the following: 1.1 PROPERTY ACQUISITION. Land-use rights have been or will be acquired as necessary to access and construct and maintain the Project on the Project Area properties. 1.2 DESIGN. Design and preparation of all necessary construction documents (drawings, technical specifications) for the Project, in accordance with the NMCWD engineer’s report, dated September, 2015, and the conceptual drawings of the Project (attached to and incorporated into this agreement as Exhibit B), to include: a. Erosion and sediment-control measures – temporary and permanent; b. Streambank stabilization measures such as vegetated reinforced soil stabilization, plantings, toe boulders; c. Realignment and meandering of two reaches; d. Reshaping channel banks; e. Vegetation of banks; f. Stabilization of channel toe; g. Grade control. Construction documents will provide for a one-year warranty on vegetation. 1.3 CONSTRUCTION. Construction of the Project by a contractor under contract to NMCWD and with construction oversight and management by the NMCWD engineer. Construction will include advance determination and procurement of permits and other regulatory approvals necessary for the Project and acquisition of the necessary permits and approvals. 1.4 MAINTENANCE. Development by NMCWD in collaboration with Edina and implementation by Edina of a plan for the post-construction maintenance of the Project (the Maintenance Plan). The Maintenance Plan will identify reporting to be completed and delineate routine maintenance and repair of the Project. 2 Cost-Sharing 2.1 NMCWD will pay 75 percent and Edina 25 percent of any costs of acquisition of land- use rights in the Project Area needed for the Project. 2.2 NMCWD will pay 100 percent of the costs for design, construction, construction oversight and management, and development of the Maintenance Plan for the Project, as described herein, as well as the development and distribution of outreach, education and publicity materials for the Project. November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 3 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project 2.3 NMCWD will pay 50 percent and Edina 50 percent of the costs of routine maintenance, as defined and specified in the Maintenance Plan. The parties will work in good faith to determine cost-sharing for maintenance and repairs of the Project beyond the routine maintenance defined and specified in the Maintenance Plan. 2.4 Each party will pay the internal and incidental costs of its participation in the Project not otherwise specified as subject to cost-sharing as specified in herein, including but not limited to costs incurred in the event NMCWD does not order the Project. 3 Specific duties – NMCWD 3.1 NMCWD will obtain the land-use rights necessary for the Project, including the right to assign such rights to Edina, where needed. In the first instance, NMCWD will attempt to obtain the necessary rights at no cost. In its sole discretion, NMCWD may elect to omit a portion or portions of the Project in response to a failure to obtain rights necessary, in NMCWD’s judgment, to construct and maintain the Project. NMCWD will retain sole discretion to determine that adequate public benefit will be obtained from the investment of public funds in the construction of the Project in general and as pertains to any particular property or properties. 3.2 NMCWD timely will consider ordering the Project. 3.3 NMCWD will contract with the NMCWD engineer for the development of the final design for the Project, along with the plans and specifications and all other necessary construction documentation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NMCWD makes no warranty to Edina regarding the NMCWD engineer’s or another third party’s performance in design, construction or construction management for the Project. NMCWD will submit 90 percent complete design plans and specifications to Edina for approval in accordance with paragraph 4.1 below. On approval of the plans by Edina, the NMCWD engineer will prepare contract documents for bidding in accordance with state procurement law. 3.4 NMCWD will contract for the construction of the Project with the lowest qualified responsible and responsive bidder, as determined by NMCWD. NMCWD will award and enter a contract for the construction of the Project that will: a. Require the contractor to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Edina, its officers, council members, employees and agents from any and all actions, costs, damages and liabilities of any nature arising from the contractor’s negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty, or a subcontractor’s negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty owed by the contractor to NMCWD. The contract will require that for any claim subject to indemnification by an employee of selected contractor or a subcontractor, the indemnification obligation is not limited by a limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the contractor or a subcontractor under workers’ compensation acts, disability acts or other employee benefit acts. b. Require that the contractor name Edina an additional insured with primary coverage for general liability on a noncontributory basis for both ongoing work and completed operations to the extent of NMCWD’s statutory liability limit. November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 4 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project c. Extend the contractor’s warranties under the agreement to Edina. 3.5 As between the parties and with the assistance and cooperation of Edina, NMCWD will obtain all permits, licenses and other necessary approvals for itself and Edina from entities with regulatory authority, as determined by NMCWD, and will ensure that the Project is completed in accordance with applicable law and regulatory standards and criteria. 3.6 NMCWD, or the NMCWD engineer on NMCWD’s behalf, will oversee the construction of the Project and preparation of the Maintenance Plan in collaboration with Edina. NMCWD may adjust the plans and specifications for the Project during construction with notice to Edina, as long as the revised plans do not require NMCWD to exceed the scope of the rights granted under this agreement or create maintenance obligations not anticipated hereunder. Until completion of construction, if NMCWD, in its judgment, should decide that the Project is infeasible, NMCWD, at its option, may declare the agreement rescinded and annulled. If NMCWD so declares, all obligations herein, performed or not, will be voided; NMCWD will return the portions of Project Area owned by Edina materially to its preexisting condition or to a condition agreed on by Edina and NMCWD. 3.7 On completion of construction of the Project, NMCWD will restore all Edina property accessed and improved as provided in subsection 4.3 of this agreement and for purposes of the Project to a condition materially equivalent to pre-existing conditions, except to the extent that such property is improved through construction of the Project. NMCWD will assign to Edina the land-use rights necessary for Edina to fulfill its reporting and maintenance obligations pursuant to paragraph 4.5 and the Maintenance Plan, once approved. Within 90 days of certification of the Project as substantially complete for the intended purposes NMCWD will provide as-built construction drawings of the Project to Edina and the Maintenance Plan for Edina’s approval in accordance with paragraph 4.5 of this agreement. 3.8 NMCWD will reimburse Edina in accordance with section 2 of this agreement for its portion of expenditures made for performance of inspections and routine maintenance of the Project as defined in and in accordance with the Maintenance Plan. 4 Specific duties – Edina 4.1 On submission by NMCWD of 90 percent plans and specifications for the Project to Edina, Edina will have 30 days to review and approve. Failure to timely act will constitute approval. Edina’s right to review and approve plans and specifications will not be unreasonably exercised. 4.2 Edina will cooperate with NMCWD’s efforts to obtain permits and approvals needed for the Project and act to facilitate proper and efficient processing of applications for city approvals. 4.3 LAND-USE RIGHTS. a. Edina hereby grants to NMCWD, its contractors, agents and assigns a nonexclusive temporary license to access and use the Edina-owned properties listed in Exhibit C, attached to and incorporated into this agreement, and adjacent city streets for November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 5 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project purposes of accessing and using the Project Area for purposes of construction of the Project. NMCWD, on reasonable notice to Edina, may temporarily restrict or preclude public access to the Project Area to ensure safety while construction or maintenance activities are under way. b. Edina will forbear from any activity that unreasonably interferes with the NMCWD’s ability to exercise its rights or meet its obligations under this agreement, including the transfer of ownership of any Edina-owned property. Subject to its interest in preserving public safety, Edina will facilitate NMCWD’s reasonable exercise of its rights under this agreement with regard to access to and use of the Edina-owned property listed in Exhibit C. Edina will not take any action within or adjacent to the Project area that could reasonably be expected to diminish the effectiveness or function of the Project for the purposes intended. c. On completion of construction of the Project, Edina will retain ownership of the portions of the Project on city-owned land, and will maintain the entire Project in accordance with the Maintenance Plan. 4.4 Edina will reimburse NMCWD in accordance with section 2 of this agreement for its portion of expenditures made in accordance with paragraphs 3.1. 4.5 Edina will work in collaboration with NMCWD to develop the draft Maintenance Plan and will comment on and approve the final draft Maintenance Plan within 45 days of receipt of the final draft with a request for approval from the NMCWD engineer, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. Failure by Edina to timely act on its rights and obligations under this paragraph will constitute approval of the Maintenance Plan. If Edina disapproves the Maintenance Plan, all maintenance requirements for the Project to assure that it will continue to effectively function as designed will become the sole responsibility of Edina. On approval of the Maintenance Plan, Edina will perform all routine maintenance and monitoring of the Project, along with reporting, as required by the Maintenance Plan. Edina will notify NMCWD of any need for major repair or maintenance of the Project (beyond the scope of the Maintenance Plan), and the parties in good faith will develop a collaborative approach to designing and implementing major repairs or maintenance. Edina will accept assignment of land-use rights secured by NMCWD for the Project for purposes of performing necessary maintenance and, as needed, repairs, pursuant to paragraph 3.7. 4.6 Edina will cooperate with NMCWD in communications and outreach related to the Project. 5 General Terms 5.1 INDEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP; LIABILITY. This agreement does not create a joint powers board or organization within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59, and neither party agrees to be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other pursuant to subdivision 1(a) of the statute. Only contractual remedies are available for the failure of a party to fulfill the terms of this agreement. Edina and NMCWD enter this agreement solely for the purposes of improving the ecological health and condition of Nine Mile Creek in Edina. Accordingly, with respect to any and all activity undertaken pursuant to this agreement, Edina and NMCWD will each hold November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 6 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project harmless, defend and indemnify the other, its officers, employees and agents for all claims, damages, liabilities, losses and expenses asserted against the other party at any time by any third party, including any governmental body. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this agreement, Edina’s and NMCWD’s obligations under this paragraph will survive the termination of the agreement. This agreement creates no right in and waives no immunity, defense or liability limitation with respect to any third party. As between the parties, only contract remedies are available for a breach of this agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NMCWD will not be deemed to have acquired by entry into or performance under this agreement, any form of interest or ownership in or to any portion of the land that is the site of the construction of the Project or adjacent property. NMCWD will not by entry into or performance under this agreement be deemed to have exercised any form of control over the use, operation or management of any portion of the property that is the site of the Project or adjacent property so as to render NMCWD a potentially responsible party for any contamination under state and/or federal law. 5.2 PUBLICITY AND ENDORSEMENT. Any publicity regarding the Project must identify Edina and NMCWD as the sponsoring entities. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for Edina or NMCWD individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the Project. NMCWD and Edina will collaborate on the development of educational and informational signage pertinent to the Project, and each party, at its cost, may develop, produce and, after approval of the other party, distribute educational, outreach and publicity materials related to the Project. 5.3 DATA MANAGEMENT. All designs, written materials, technical data, research or any other work-in-progress will be shared between the parties to this agreement on request, except as prohibited by law. As soon as is practicable, the party preparing plans, specifications, contractual documents, materials for public communication or education will provide them to the other party for recordkeeping and other necessary purposes. 5.4 DATA PRACTICES. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this agreement is governed by the Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 13, any other applicable state statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. 5.5 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement, as it may be amended in writing, contains the complete and entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, representations and understandings, if any, between the parties respecting such matters. The recitals stated at the outset are incorporated into and a part of the agreement. 5.6 WAIVERS. The waiver by Edina or NMCWD of any breach or failure to comply with any provision of this agreement by the other party will not be construed as nor will it constitute a continuing waiver of such provision or a waiver of any other breach of or failure to comply with any other provision of this agreement. November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 7 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project 5.7 NOTICES. Any notice, demand or communication under this agreement by either party to the other will be deemed to be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid to: Edina NMCWD Ross Bintner Kevin Bigalke, Administrator 4801 West 50th St 12800 Gerard Drive Edina, MN 55424 Edina, MN 55346 952-903-5713 952-835-2078 5.9 TERM; TERMINATION. This agreement is effective on execution by both parties and will terminate three years from the date of execution of the latest amendment hereto or on the written agreement of both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the agreement to be duly executed intending to be bounded thereby. (Signature page follows.) November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 8 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project CITY OF EDINA MAYOR By: _______________________________ Title: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________ CITY MANAGER By: _______________________________ Title: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________ Approved as to form & execution: _____________________________ City attorney NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By: _______________________________ Title: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________ Approved as to form & execution: _____________________________ District counsel November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 9 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project EXHIBIT A Project Area November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 9 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project EXHIBIT A Project Area Ba r r F o o t e r : A r c G I S 1 0 . 0 , 2 0 1 1 - 1 1 - 2 3 1 2 : 0 2 F i l e : I : \ C l i e n t \ N m c w d \ W o r k o r d e r s \ C r e e k S t a b i l i z a t i o n W o r k _ 2 0 1 1 \ M a p s \ R e p o r t s \ F i g 0 8 B H i s t o r i c C h a n n e l s . m x d U s e r : k a c 2 !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( 7 3 2 9 1 5 6 8 4 10 5 4 £¤169 £¤212 £¤169 £¤212 62 62 4567158 Vernon A v e Gle a s o n R d Vi e w L a Olinger Blvd 68th St Mc c a u l e y T r Sc h a e f e r R d Indian Hills Rd W 68th St Ha n s e n R d Mccauley Tr W Valley La Da k o t a T r Grove St C r e s c e n t D r Ar b o u r A v e Wa s h i n g t o n A v e West Tr Dovre Dr Wa l n u t D r Ol i n g e r R d S a l l y L a Valleyvie w R d L i m e r i c k D r Jeff Pl Benton Ave Jo h n s o n D r War d e n A v e Hi l l s i d e L a Ga l w a y D r Tra c y A v e Lim e r i c k L a Cahill Rd Bla k e R d Ta m a r a c A v e Sun R d Amy Dr Ki l l a r n e y L a Iro q u o i s T r No r d i c D r Mo h a w k T r L i n c o l n D r Gleason Ct Londonderry Dr C h e y e n n e T r Highland Rd Chapel Dr Parkwood La Biscayne Blvd W 66th St Creek Valley Rd India n H i l l s P a s s Ka y m a r D r We s t r i d g e B l v d Countryside Rd Vernon Ct Sc a n d i a R d Eden P r a i r i e R d W 61st St W y c l i f f e R d Sioux Tr Arctic Way Langford Dr Susan Ave Lois La Me r h o l d D r Colonial Way C r e e k D r Cherokee T r Timber Rd g Samuel Rd N a v a h o T r M c I n t y r e C t Stauder Cir S Knoll Dr De V i l l e D r Hunter St Balder La Tim b e r T r W Apache Rd Hillside Ct Hi l l s i d e R d Post La Nordic C i r Hawkes Dr Ne w p o r t D r Cam e l b a c k D r Arbour La Cahil l L a Co n t i n e n t a l D r Grace Ter Dunc a n L a Aspen Rd Ro s e m a r y L a St u a r t A v e Cres t L a Sher m a n C i r P o l a r C i r Ol i n g e r C i r G l a c i e r P l B l a c k F o o t P a s s Schaefer C i r Ha b i t a t C t Valle y V i e w R d Ridge Park Rd I r o q u o i s C i r Hawkes Ter W 64th St Lyle Cir Grove Cir Mar g a r e t s L a Oa k L a Saint Al b a n s C i r Brendan C t Ga r d e n A v e Gleason Ter D o r o n D r Arro w h e a d P a s s Berne Cir Scandi a C t Grove St Biscayne Blvd Limerick L a Creek Valley Rd Benton Ave Tra c y A v e Ha n s e n R d Figure 3-1 SURVEY DATA REACHES 1-9 Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Edina, MN 800 0 800400 Feet !(2011 Survey Points 2011 Cross Sections North Branch Nine Mile Creek City of Edina Boundary !;N Exhibit A: Page 1 Ba r r F o o t e r : A r c G I S 1 0 . 0 , 2 0 1 1 - 1 1 - 2 3 1 2 : 0 2 F i l e : I : \ C l i e n t \ N m c w d \ W o r k o r d e r s \ C r e e k S t a b i l i z a t i o n W o r k _ 2 0 1 1 \ M a p s \ R e p o r t s \ F i g 0 8 B H i s t o r i c C h a n n e l s . m x d U s e r : k a c 2 !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( 12 9 13 14 10 15 11 100 100 456728 456728 W 70th St W 66th St Ca h i l l R d We s t S h o r e D r Me t r o B l v d Wo o d d a l e A v e Brook Dr Dewy Hill Rd W 77th St Tr a c y A v e W 68th St Se r v i c e R d Hil l s i d e L a Hibiscus Ave Da n e n s D r O h m s L a Lim e r i c k L a Dunberry L a La n h a m L a W B u s h L a k e R d An t r i m R d W 78th St Tifton D r W 74th St D e l a n e y B l v d Br i t t a n y R d Rid g e v i e w D r W 76th St G a l w a y D r 68th St Gilford Dr Po i n t D r Edina Industrial Blvd M e a d o w R d g Cr e s t o n R d Lo n g B r a k e T r Aber c r o m b i e D r Valle y V i e w R d Tril l i u m L a Upp e r T e r Mcguire Rd No r m a n d a l e R d Fle e t w o o d D r S o u t h c r e s t D r Eve r e t t P l Er i n T e r Pi c t u r e D r Chapel Dr L a r k s p u r L a Fondel l D r Viking Dr Kemrich Dr D u g g a n P l z S c h e y D r Wilf o r d W a y St a t e H i g h w a y 1 0 0 S e r R d Creek Valley Rd Susan Ave H y d e P a r k D r Lois La Lee Valley Rd Ellswo r t h D r Ke l l o g A v e Aspasia La Gle a s o n R d Dunh a m D r Sedum La Ke l l o g g A v e Laguna D r R a b u n D r Na o m i D r Dewey Hill Rd W 73rd St Sh a n n o n D r Lim e r i c k D r Shane Dr P o p p y L a D o w n R d Tra l e e D r Andover Rd Be l t l i n e H w y Belvidere La Clare m o r e D r Roycar Rd W 69th St Am u n d s o n A v e A n t r i m C t K n o b H i l l D r M o n a r d o L a Co m p u t e r A v e Ma r t h C t Cahil l L a W 72 n d S t Aspasia Cir C l a r e d o n D r C e c i l i a C i r W a r r e n A v e Village Dr Dubli n C i r Ta r a R d Ch u r c h P l We s t o n C i r Judson L a Harve y L a Lo c h m e r e T e r Creek View La Ke n n y P l Tan g l e w o o d C t Clare m o r e C t Phlox La Sh a u g h n e s s y R d Shann o n C i r Lon g B r a k e C i r Circl e D r Hyde Park Cir G l e a s o n R d Sh a n n o n D r W 66th St W 7 8 t h S t Cahill Rd W 78th S t Dunh a m D r W 69th St Figure 3-2 SURVEY DATA REACHES 10-15 Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Edina, MN 800 0 800400 Feet !(2011 Survey Points 2011 Survey Cross Sections North Branch Nine Mile Creek City of Edina Boundary !;N Exhibit A: Page 2 November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 10 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project EXHIBIT B Conceptual Plans Exhibit B: Page 1 Exhibit B: Page 2 Exhibit B: Page 3 Exhibit B: Page 4 Exhibit B: Page 5 Exhibit B: Page 6 Exhibit B: Page 7 Exhibit B: Page 8 Exhibit B: Page 9 Exhibit B: Page 10 Exhibit B: Page 11 Exhibit B: Page 12 Exhibit B: Page 13 Exhibit B: Page 14 Exhibit B: Page 15 Exhibit B: Page 16 Exhibit B: Page 17 Exhibit B: Page 18 Exhibit B: Page 19 Exhibit B: Page 20 Exhibit B: Page 21 Exhibit B: Page 22 Exhibit B: Page 23 Exhibit B: Page 24 Exhibit B: Page 25 Exhibit B: Page 26 Exhibit B: Page 27 Exhibit B: Page 28 Exhibit B: Page 29 Exhibit B: Page 30 Exhibit B: Page 31 Exhibit B: Page 32 Exhibit B: Page 33 November 23, 2015 Cooperative Agreement 11 Edina-NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project EXHIBIT C City of Edina Properties P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271132 Nine Mile Creek Restoration - Edina\WorkFiles\Agrmnt_CityofEdina_9-Mile\Exhibit C_01_List of Properties.docx Exhibit C City of Edina Properties within the Project Limits Reach Pin # Reach 1 31-117-21-23-0042 31-117-21-23-0043 31-117-21-23-0047 31-117-21-23-0054 Reach 2 31-117-21-31-0002 31-117-21-31-0042 31-117-21-31-0142 31-117-21-32-0107 Reach 3 31-117-21-42-0001 31-117-21-42-0002 31-117-21-42-0003 31-117-21-42-0004 31-117-21-42-0036 31-117-21-43-0013 31-117-21-43-0080 Reach 4 31-117-21-42-0022 06-116-21-12-0002 Reach 5 06-116-21-11-0001 06-116-21-12-0002 Reach 6 06-116-21-11-0001 Reach 8 05-116-21-13-0005 05-116-21-13-0029 05-116-21-13-0061 Reach 9 05-116-21-41-0058 05-116-21-41-0078 Reach 10 05-116-21-44-0066 Reach 11 05-116-21-44-0037 05-116-21-44-0038 05-116-21-44-0063 Reach 12 04-116-21-33-0064 05-116-21-44-0028 08-116-21-11-0012 08-116-21-11-0016 09-116-21-22-0021 Reach 13 09-116-21-22-0032 09-116-21-24-0008 09-116-21-24-0022 Exhibit C: Page C-1 B a r r F o o t e r : A r c G I S 1 0 . 3 . 1 , 2 0 1 5 - 1 1 - 0 2 1 3 : 5 7 F i l e : I : \ C l i e n t \ N m c w d \ W o r k o r d e r s \ 2 0 1 1 \ C r e e k S t a b i l i z a t i o n W o r k _ 2 0 1 1 \ M a p s \ M I S C \ L a r g e P a r c e l M a p - C i t y a n d P r i v a t e P a r c e l s . m x d U s e r : j r v 62 100 Figure X PROPOSED EASEMENT ACQUISITION AND AFFECTED PROPERTIES Nine Mile Creek Restoration Project Edina, MN!;N 650 0 650 325FeetNorth Branch Nine Mile Creek Parcels City of Edina Parcels Private Owned Parcels Exhibit C: Page C-2 Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Public Hearing: 2016 Building & Liquor License Fees, Ordinance No. 2015-25: Amending City Code Chapter 2, Section 2-724 Schedule A, Setting Fees for 2016 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Hold a public hearing on the proposed Building & Liquor License fees and charges. Adopt Ordinance 2015-25 Amending City Code Chapter 2, Section 2-724 Schedule A, Setting Fees for 2016, including waiver of second reading. INTRODUCTION: Attached are schedules for fees and charges to be adopted by ordinance proposed for 2016. The fees that are proposed to change from 2015 to 2016 are in bold. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance 2015-25 Fees For 2016 ORDINANCE NO. 2015-25 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to City Code Chapter 2, Section 2-724 are amended to read as follows: Chapter and Section Purpose of Fee/Charge 2015 Fee Proposed 2016 Fee Chapter 4 4-4 Liquor License fees (per year) $8,875.00 On-sale intoxicating license, restaurants only $8,900.00 On-sale intoxicating license, restaurants only $680.00 3.2 beer license off- or on-sale $690.00 3.2 beer license off- or on-sale NA $1,300.00 Brew pub license NA $1,300.00 Cocktail room license NA $1,300.00 Brewer taproom license $100.00 Per event, temporary on-sale 3.2 malt liquor $105.00 Per event, temporary on-sale 3.2 malt liquor $200.00 Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating $210.00 Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Chapter 10 10-19 Landscaping, screening or erosion control site plan permit $100.00 $105.00 10-74 Building Permit If total valuation of work is: $1.00 to $500.00 $30.00 Then amount is: * $31.50 Then amount is: * $501.00 to $2,000.00 $30.00 *For first $500.00, plus $31.50 *For first $500.00, plus $3.35 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $3.52 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $80.25 *For first $2,000.00, plus $84.30 *For first $2,000.00, plus $15.50 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $16.28 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $436.75 *For first $25,000.00, plus $458.74 *For first $25,000.00, plus Ordinance No. 2015-25 Page 2 $11.00 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $11.55 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $711.75 *For first $50,000.00, plus $747.49 *For first $50,000.00, plus $8.00 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $8.40 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,111.75 *For first $100,000.00, plus $1,167.49 *For first $100,000.00, plus $6.00 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $6.30 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,511.75 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $3,687.49 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $5.25 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $5.51 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $6,133.75 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $6,442.49 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $4.00 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof $4.20 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Pre pay Electronic application fee N/A Fee is part of the whole permit charged at time of permit issued 0.50% Application fee .50% of the value of the project 10-75 Other permit-related fees $100.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $105.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 10-108 Demolition permit for single- and two-family dwelling units $1,500.00 $1,575.00 10-110 New one and two-family dwelling units escrow $2,500.00 $10,000.00 10-306 Permit for moving of building $212.00 $222.60 Ordinance No. 2015-25 Page 3 10- 306(a)(3) Indemnity deposit for damages sustained by moving of building $530.00 Unless licensed by commissioner of transportation $556.50 Unless licensed by commissioner of transportation 10-368 Installer's licenses; oil burner: Stoker; steam or hot water heating; mechanical warm air heating and air conditioning; refrigeration; and gas piping installers $60.00 $63.00 10-403 Gas piping permit; oil burner: Stoker, steam or hot water heating, mechanical warm air heating and air conditioning; refrigeration $25.00 Minimum Fee: Residential—Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. §16B.70 $30.00 Minimum Fee: Residential—Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. §16B.70 $17.00 Fee Calculations: *Plus 3.10% >$500.00 $27.00 Fee Calculations: *Plus 3.10% >$500.00 $0.00 to $1,000.00 $1,001.00 to $5,000.00 $35.00 *Plus 2.60% > $1,000.00 $36.05 *Plus 2.60% > $1,000.00 $5,001.00 to $10,000.00 $150.00 *Plus 2.15% > $5,000.00 $154.50 *Plus 2.15% > $5,000.00 $10,001.00 to $25,000.00 $265.00 *Plus 1.85% > $10,000.00 $272.95 *Plus 1.85% > $10,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $575.00 *Plus 1.65% > $25,000.00 $592.25 *Plus 1.65% > $25,000.00 $50,001.00 and over $1,000.00 *Plus 1.30% > $50,000.00 $1,030.00 *Plus 1.30% > $50,000.00 Plan review N/A 25% of permit fee *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 10- 403(1) Other permit-related fees $68.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $100.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 10-429 Plumbing or water conditioning permit $27.00 Minimum Fee: Residential, plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 $30.00 Minimum Fee: Residential, plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 $0.00 to $300.00 $20.00 Fee Calculations: $27.00 Fee Calculations: $301.00 to $700.00 $20.00 *Plus 3.10% > $27.00 *Plus 3.10% > Ordinance No. 2015-25 Page 4 $300.00 $300.00 $701.00 to $1,000.00 $25.00 *Plus 2.60% > $700.00 $30.00 *Plus 2.60% > $700.00 $1,001.00 to $5,000.00 $35.00 *Plus 2.15% > $1,000.00 $36.05 *Plus 2.15% > $1,000.00 $5,001.00 to $10,000.00 $150.00 *Plus 1.85% > $5,000.00 $154.50 *Plus 1.85% > $5,000.00 $10,001.00 to $25,000.00 $265.00 *Plus 1.75% > $10,000.00 $272.95 *Plus 1.75% > $10,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $575.00 *Plus 1.65% > $25,000.00 $592.25 *Plus 1.65% > $25,000.00 $50,001.00 and over $1,000.00 *Plus 1.30% > $50,000.00 $1,030.00 *Plus 1.30% > $50,000.00 Plan review N/A 25% of permit fee *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 Pre pay Electronic plan review N/A Fee is part of the whole permit charged at time of application 0.50% Application fee .50% of the value of the project Installation or testing of RPZ backflow preventers $35.00 $31.50 10- 429(1) Other permit-related fees $100.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $105.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 10-465 Surcharge for prohibited connection to sanitary sewer $110.00 Per month $115.00 Per month 10- 513(d) Public swimming pool license $470.00 Per year for each enclosed pool (partial or all of the year) $495.00 Per year for each enclosed pool (partial or all of the year) $340.00 Per year for each outdoor pool $360.00 Per year for each outdoor pool Public whirlpool bath or therapeutic swimming pool license $170.00 Per year for each bath or pool $180.00 Per year for each bath or pool 10- 570(a) Parking ramp license $135.00 Per year $140.00 Per year Chapter 18 18-67(a) Nonbusiness hours inspection $100.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee $120.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee Ordinance No. 2015-25 Page 5 Construction permits required by MSFC § 105.7, except for those covered in this Code in chapter 18, article III, division 5, if total valuation of work is: $1.00 to $500.00 $60.00 *Minimum fee $75.00 *Minimum fee $501.00 to $2,000.00 $60.00 *For first $500.00, plus $75.00 *For first $500.00, plus $4.00 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $4.50 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $120.00 *For first $2,000.00, plus $125.00 *For first $2,000.00, plus $16.00 For each additional including $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $16.50 For each additional including $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $488.00 *For first $25,000.00, plus $507.50 *For first $25,000.00, plus $12.00 For each additional including $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $12.50 For each additional including $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $788.00 *For first $50,000.00, plus $819.50 *For first $50,000.00, plus $9.00 For each additional including $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $9.50 For each additional including $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,238.00 *For first $100,000.00, plus $1,287.50 *For first $100,000.00, plus $7.00 For each additional including $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $7.50 For each additional including $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,038.00 $6.00 *For the first $500,000.00, plus For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $4,199.50 $6.50 *For the first $500,000.00, plus For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $7,038.00 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $7,319.50 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus Ordinance No. 2015-25 Page 6 $5.00 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof $5.50 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Plan check 70% of permit fee 65% of permit fee for systems with valuation over $1,000.00 18-67(b) Code compliance inspection $64.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $75.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 18-131 License to service fire extinguishers $100.00 Per year per person licensed $110.00 Per year per person licensed 18-168 Permit fee for cleaning kitchen exhaust hood and duct systems $90.00 $94.00 18- 195(a) Sprinkler permit fees, per number of heads: 1—5 $60.00 *Minimum fee $75.00 *Minimum fee 6—12 $90.00 * $95.00 * 13—25 $140.00 * $148.00 * 26—50 $260.00 * $276.00 * 51—75 $340.00 * $360.00 * 76—100 $400.00 * $424.00 * 101—125 $440.00 * $466.00 * 126—150 $470.00 * $489.00 * 151—175 $510.00 * $530.00 * 176—200 $540.00 * $562.00 * 201 plus $620.00 *For first 200, plus $3.00 for each additional head $645.00 *For first 200, plus $3.00 for each additional head Fire pump installation and associated hardware $255.00 $300.00 Dry valve assembly $255.00 $350.00 Hydrant flow test $110.00 $120.00 Standpipe installation $160.00 $185.00 Each additional standpipe $55.00 $60.00 Plan check N/A 65% of permit fee for systems with > 12 Sprinkler heads Fire alarm and alternative fire suppression permit, if total valuation of work is: $1.00 to $500.00 $60.00 *Minimum fee $75.00 *Minimum fee Ordinance No. 2015-25 Page 7 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $60.00 *For first $500.00, plus $75.00 *For first $500.00, plus $4.00 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $4.50 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $120.00 *For first $2,000.00, plus $125.00 *For first $2,000.00, plus $16.00 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $16.50 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $488.00 *For first $25,000.00, plus $507.50 *For first $25,000.00, plus $12.00 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $12.50 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $788.00 *For first $50,000.00, plus $819.50 *For first $50,000.00, plus $9.00 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $9.50 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,238.00 *For first $100,000.00, plus $1,287.50 *For first $100,000.00, plus $7.00 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $7.50 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,038.00 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $4,199.50 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $6.00 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000,000.00 $6.50 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $7,038.00 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $7,319.50 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $5.00 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof $5.50 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Plan check 70% of permit fee 65% of permit fee for systems with a valuation over $1,000.00 Ordinance No. 2015-25 Page 8 18- 195(b) Other permit-related fees $64.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $75.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) Chapter 20 20-218 Recycling service $5.25 Per quarter, single family $6.00 Per quarter, single family $5.25 Per quarter, double bungalow $6.00 Per quarter, double bungalow $5.25 Per quarter, apartments/condos (2—8 units) $6.00 Per quarter, apartments/condos (2—8 units) Chapter 30 30-28 Other permit-related fees $68.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $100.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2016. First Reading: December 1, 2015 Second Reading: Waived Published: December 10, 2015 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT, THURSDAY, December 10, 2015 SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Public Hearing: Review of 2016 Operating Budget, Resolution No. 2015-121: Setting 2016 Tax Levy and Adopting 2016 Operating Budget Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Hold a public hearing on the 2016 Operating Budget. Council also may approve Resolution No. 2015-121 Setting 2016 Tax Levy and Adopting 2016 Operating Budget. INTRODUCTION: The City started the 2016-2017 Budget development process early in the year. Department heads finalized their budget requests in May, taking into consideration the 2016-2017 City-Wide work plan themes that were initially developed by the City Council at a February retreat. City Manager Scott Neal introduced the proposed City-Wide Work Plan and Budget to the City Council at a July work session. The City Council reviewed the proposed Budget at an August work session, and on September 1, 2015 the City staff and City Manager Scott Neal recommended a preliminary levy for taxes payable in 2016 based on the input received throughout the year. City Council adopted the recommended preliminary levy, which would increase the total of all levies by $2,099,113 or 7.07%. Staff recommends the preliminary levy be approved as final as shown in attached Resolution No. 2015-121. If no budget resolution is passed on December 1, then the Council is required by statute to act at the next meeting on December 15, 2015. The attached draft budget book is updated from the first draft Council saw at the November 10, 2015 work session. The earlier draft may be discarded now. The attached draft does not include any changes to the budget amounts, but does included improved content based on Council feedback received by staff. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2016-2017 Budget Book - Draft Staff Report: Resolution No. 2015-121 Setting 2016 Tax Leving and Adopting 2016 Operating Budget For living, learning, raising families, and doing business. City of Edina 2016-2017 BUDGET DR A F T 2 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2015 Edina City Council Mayor James Hovland Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Ann Swenson Council Member Kevin Staunton Council Member Bob Stewart City of Edina Staff City Manager Scott Neal Assistant City Manager Lisa Schaefer Finance Director Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director Kyle Sawyer Contributing Staff 2014-15 City Management Fellow Lindy Crawford 2015-16 City Management Fellow Devin Massopust DR A F T 3 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DR A F T 4 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION Welcome Letter 6 2016 Citizen’s Report 8 Community Background 13 Organizational Highlights 14 Vision Edina 17 Performance Management and Measurement 18 Economic Outlook 25 Budget Process 28 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2016-2017 Overview 32 Property Tax Levies 33 Consolidated Budget Summaries 34 Combined Budget Summary 35 City of Edina Employees 37 Revenue 39 Capital Improvements 42 Debt Service 45 III. FUND LEVEL FINANCIAL SCHEDULES Fund Descriptions 50 Operating Fund Crosswalk 53 2014 Actual Financial Results by Fund 54 2015 Budget by Fund 56 2016 Budget by Fund 58 2017 Budget by Fund 60 Transfers 62 Projected Changes in Fund Balance—All Funds 64 IV. DEPARTMENTS Administration 70 Communications & Technology Services 89 Human Resources 98 Finance 101 Public Works 105 Engineering 118 Police 128 Fire 139 Parks & Recreation 148 Community Development 174 V. COMMUNITY PROFILE 183 VI. GLOSSARY 189 VII. APPENDIX 195 DR A F T For living, learning, raising families, and doing business. City of Edina INTRODUCTION DR A F T City Manager’s Message I am pleased to present to you the 2016-2017 biennial budget document for the City of Edina. I often tell City staff members, residents and elected officials alike, that this document and the process used to create it is one of the most important functions of local government. It is representative of the principles and priorities that the City values and is indicative of the direction that the City is heading. Every budget also tells a story. This document strives to tell that story in a comprehensive and comprehendible manner. The new Citizen’s Report is a tool that can be used to quickly understand the financial health of the City ad key factors that determined the outcomes of this document. I hope you will find it useful. The most important part of this budget story is that it enables us to continue to provide the public services that help make Edina what it is — one of the premier places for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Happy reading. 2016-2017 Budget Story Liquor Operations The City’s municipal liquor operation helps offset the amount of property taxes that the City collects by contributing most of its profits to the General Fund as well as to other enterprise funds. The Liquor Fund has transferred out on average $1.4 million a year since 2010. We were projecting to earn approximately $1.8 million in 2016. Though our municipal liquor operation is still profitable, the amount of income being realized is lower than it has been in previous years due to new competition in the marketplace. The City has budgeted a $700,000 transfer out of the Liquor Fund in 2016, which is about $1.1 million less than the previous year’s budget. $100,000 of that transfer will go towards the General Fund. That is $665,100 less than what was budgeted for in 2015. About 2.2% of the General Fund levy increase in 2016 is due to the decreased liquor transfer. We have already made structural changes to our stores and adjustments to our operations in response to the new competition. We have also changed the way we budget our profit from the liquor operation so that in the future changes in income will not significantly impact our property tax levy. The proposed total property tax levy for 2016 is $31,799,123. This represents a 7.07% increase from 2015. For the property owner of the median single family home in Edina, that increase represents $5.86 more per month paid in City taxes than in 2015. That extra $5.86 will allow us to continue to provide the services our residents have come to know and at the quality they have come to expect. The following are some key issues and decisions that were considered in creating this budget. DR A F T 7 Employees and Wages The employees that work for the City are the most important factors for the city government to effectively carry out its duties. Ensuring that the City pays competitive wages is a high priority in order to ensure that we attract and retain talented individuals. In that regard, we have budgeted for a 2.5% general wage increase for employee salaries in 2016. The 2016-2017 budget has a total increase of two full-time employees from the previous year’s budget. The increase is due to five new positions being added and three positions being eliminated. However, four of the five new positions are paid through the General Fund property tax levy while the three that were eliminated were paid through various enterprise funds. The minimum wage will also be increasing in 2016. The increase affects many part-time positions within the City. The impact will be an increase of approximately $30,000 in budgeted funds for 2016. The increase in employee wages and benefits represents 3.4% of the total property tax increase. Health Insurance Premiums In 2016, health insurance premiums for City employees will increase 11.5%. Because costs for employee benefits are shared between employees and the City, the City’s portion of benefits will increase. Service Delivery Levels This budget ensures that the City is able to deliver the “status quo” of services that our residents, businesses and visitors have come to know. Certain priorities had to be left out due to decreased revenue. However, this budget will serve as a ,foundation for achieving those projects in the future. Scott H. Neal City Manager DR A F T 8 2016 Citizen’s Report This Citizen’s Report is meant to provide a general summary of the 2016 budget by highlighting all major governmental and nongovernmental funds that compose the budget document. Each section details the major revenues and expenditures of each fund as well as the total budget for each. As you read the Citizen’s Report, we hope that you gain a clear understanding of the budget and the services that it allows us to provide to the City of Edina. Also find in the Citizen’s Report a few winners from the 2015 Edina Photo Contest. DR A F T 9 Total Tax Levy $31,799,123 General Fund $25,023,952 The total tax levy for the 2016 budget is $31,799,123. This represents a 7.07% increase from 2015. The total tax levy includes levies for the General Fund, Arts and Culture Fund, Debt Service Fund, and the Construction Fund. General Fund $36,661,872 2016 Citizen’s Report The City’s General Fund Budget for 2016 is $36,661,872. This is an increase of $1,841,640 or 5.3% from the adopted budget for 2015. The General Fund provides financing for the widest range of services provided by the City including funding for parks, police, fire, engineering and debt payments on major capital projects. Personal services are increasing by $998,604, or 4% from 2015. Transfers into the fund decreased by $665,100, or 89% from the previous year’s budget. HRA Fund $4,780,835 Major Governmental Funds The HRA fund is a special revenue fund used to account for activities related to economic development within the City. It is financed primarily through tax increments and bond proceeds. Significant fund expenditures in 2016- 2017 include potential parking improvements at 50th & France including the expansion of the North Parking Ramp and implementing a plan to redevelop the former Public Works site in the Grandview district. In 2017 there is an HRA property tax levy of $90,000 scheduled. "What an Edina Kid Does in the Winter While Waiting for the School Bus" by Ryan Gordon DR A F T 10 Debt Service Fund $31,799,123 Debt Service Fund $7,552,545 2016 Citizen’s Report The City’s Debt Service Fund is used to pay for principal and interest pay- ments on debt that the City issues to pay for significant capital projects. The debt service property tax levy is $5,075,171 for 2016 which is about a 1% decrease from 2015. Some of the debt issued by the City is paid for by other means than property taxes, which is why the total debt service payment is higher than the debt service tax levy. Some projects the debt service fund currently pays for are the new Sports Dome and Public Works facility. Major Governmental Funds (cont.) "Say Cheese!" by Lisa Hafey The City’s Construction Fund provides financing for the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the Equipment Replacement Program. The City plans to levy $1.7 million in property taxes for the Construction Fund in 2016, about $100,000 more than in 2015. The levy is used for the replacement of vehicles and equipment used across a variety of departments. Construction Fund $14,708,871 DR A F T 11 Debt Ser- vice 2016 Citizen’s Report Construction Fund $9,981,530 Utilities Fund $15,918,339 Major Enterprise Funds The Utilities Fund is used to account for the use and operation of the City’s water and stormwater systems. Expenditures for the fund are increasing by 11% from the 2015 budget due primarily to an increase in depreciation expenses and contractual services. The fund is expected to have a $4,167,671 increase in net position during 2016. The Liquor Fund accounts for the operations of the three City owned liquor stores. The fund also provides subsidies from profits to other funds to help finance the basic operating purposes of these funds. The total transfer out of the liquor fund in 2016 is budgeted for $700,000 and is lower than previous years due to new competition in the marketplace. After the transfer out, the Liquor fund is expected to have a $37,861 decrease in net position in 2016 which will be supported by the Fund’s reserve balance. Liquor Fund $12,462,118 “Sunset at Braemar” by Bryan Singer DR A F T 12 Debt Service Fund $31,799,123 2016 Citizen’s Report Aquatic Center Fund $918,406 Major Enterprise Funds (cont.) The Aquatic Center Fund accounts for all revenues and expenditures related to the operation of the City’s outdoor swimming pool. It was named the best outdoor swim- ming pool in Edina by the Sun Current. The Aquatic Center Fund has budgeted revenues of $982,477 for 2016, which equates to a 107% cost recovery rate. The City has made it a priority to ensure that enterprise funds are reaching a certain threshold of cost recovery rates. Golf Course Fund $3,202,114 The 2016 budget for the City’s golf operations is $3.2 million. The golf enterprise is currently undergoing significant changes to its operational structure as well as renovations to the courses. In 2015, the driving range at Braemar Golf Course was closed so that renovations could be completed to expand it in order to allow for more users. Braemar Golf Course also outsourced it’s food operations to Tin Fish in 2015. The City has approved alter- ing the course from a 27-hole course to an improved, 18-hole course which will maintain revenue streams and cut down on operating expenses. "Centennial Lake Babies" by Becky Parkin Arena Fund $2,610,691 The Arena Fund accounts for the operations of Braemar Arena, a facility that houses three indoor skating rinks and one outdoor rink. The Fund is budgeted to have a 85% cost recovery rate before transfers in 2016. The largest revenue source for Braemar Arena is building rental fees from various sporting associations as well as two private enterprises within the building. In 2014 the fund received a $2.4 million transfer to en- sure a healthy fund balance moving into the future. DR A F T 13 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Edina began as a small farming and milling community settled by Irish and Scottish families in the mid 1800s near Minnehaha Creek. At that time, the area was part of Richfield Township, but in 1888, the residents voted to separate from Richfield Township and incorporated as the Village of Edina. The City is now a fully developed first-ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of about 50,000 residents. Currently, 98 percent of the City is developed. Its first major period of growth occurred in the 1950s as residents and businesses looked to move into suburban neighborhoods. The late 1960s and early 1970s were another significant period of growth. Today, the City is in a period of “redevelopment” as aging structures (both commercial and residential) are being replaced with newer structures that better suit the needs of 21st century businesses and residents. Approximately 59 percent of Edina’s land area is attributed to low-density residential neighborhoods, 12 percent to commercial/industrial uses, 16 percent parks and open space with the remainder used for local, county and state roadways. Many major highways run through or are close to Edina, making it readily accessible to all within the Minneapolis metropolitan area. Edina is a short, 15-minute drive from the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. The City provides a full range of public services, including police and fire protection; construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure; water and sewer services and recreational and cultural activities and events. Community Background DR A F T 14 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The City of Edina operates under the Council-Manager form of government. Policy-making and legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor and four other members, all elected on a non-partisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for approving ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees and hiring the City Manager. Council members serve four-year terms, with two Council members elected every two years. The Mayor also serves a four-year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Council and for overseeing the day-to-day operations of the city government. Edina has six “operating” departments and four “supporting” departments. Organizational Highlights DR A F T 15 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Mission To provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses Vision Edina holds a well-earned reputation as a city of choice. It is the model of a successful, mature, and progressive urban community, that strives to lead in a modern and evolving world. We maintain our heritage and attractiveness, and afford our residents the highest quality of life, while actively embracing the future. The features that define our future community include: Inclusive and Connected Built-to-Scale Development Sustainable Environment Community of Learning Future-Oriented Edina has three critical sources of policy guidance for the operating budget. Vision Edina serves as the long-range strategic plan for the City. This critical document is an extension of a previous guiding document, Edina Vision 20/20. Vision Edina is a long-term strategic framework that helps our community understand and guide the important decision-making that will impact Edina’s future, including the adoption of the 2016-2017 budget. Vision Edina includes the City’s mission and vision: Another key policy document is the City’s Comprehensive Plan, which guides development and redevelopment and addresses changes likely to occur due to various social and market forces. Edina’s Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2008 and formally adopted in 2009. In accordance with State law, it will be updated again in 2018. The City is continually working to update its aging infrastructure. Our bi-annually adopted five-year Capital Improvement Plan includes spending and financing projections for these projects. The Capital Improvement Plan was first adopted in 2007 and the City Council is currently implementing its 2015-2019 Plan. ORGANIZATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS Key Policy Documents Vision Edina Strategic Plan and Framework Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvement Plan DR A F T 16 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORGANIZATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS The City of Edina has had several notable, financial achievements over the last two years. Independent bond-rating agencies Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Service affirmed their high bond ratings of Edina in the fall of 2014. Edina is one of just a few communities in Minnesota with both "AAA" and "Aaa" ratings. Moody's Investors Service in 2000 gave the City of Edina its highest rating, Aaa. In 2002, Standard & Poor's upgraded Edina's general obligation bond rating to AAA, the company's highest rating. The agencies have reaffirmed their ratings several times since, most recently in the fall of 2014. The ratings reflect the agencies' view of the City's: Participation in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area economy and role as a first-ring suburb in the prosperous Twin Cities western suburbs; Continued strong financial performance with very strong fund balance levels on a dollar and percent of expenditure basis; Evidence of continued strong management practices; and Manageable debt burden with a rapid amortization schedule. The bond rating upgrade helps to ensure that future Edina debt will be issued with the lowest possible interest expense and cost to the taxpayer. Vision without Action is a dream. Action without Vision is simply passing the time. Action with Vision is making a positive difference. - Joel Barker DR A F T 17 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Vision Edina is a long-term strategic framework that helps our community understand and guide the important decision -making that will impact Edina’s future. The vision and strategic framework is the outcome of a broad-based and inclusive community visioning process. The engagement portion of this important planning process ran from September to December 2014 and gathered significant community input. Vision Edina represented an opportunity for all residents to have an impact and contribute to creating the shared future vision. Vision Edina is part of the overall community process to update the long-term vision for the City of Edina. The process of creating the guiding document was completed in May of 2015. This framework lays out the key issues identified by our community, which we need to focus our attention and resources on over the coming years. Eight key strategic focus areas have emerged through the Vision Edina process. These areas are built from the key drivers and issues identified early in the Vision Edina process, and have carried through the extensive community and stakeholder engagement process. Below are the eight strategic focus areas as identified through Vision Edina: Strategic Focus Areas 1. Residential Development Mix 2. Transportation Options 3. Commercial Development Mix 4. Live and Work 5. Educational Focus 6. Population Mix 7. Environmental Stewardship 8. Regional Leadership Vision Edina DR A F T 18 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA In the City of Edina, the operating budget is part of a comprehensive approach to performance management. The principles of this performance system are outlined below: Systemic Strategic objectives play an integral role in leadership decision-making, organization planning and resource allocation. Reflects Community Goals Community input is gathered to determine desired community goals and outcomes. These goals are captured in a strategic plan that serves as the anchor for the performance management system. Aligned at All Levels The City’s departmental plans/programs reflect community goals. Departments work cooperatively across functional lines to achieve key outcomes. Employees understand how their work ties to City’s mission, vision and strategy. Outcome-Based Success is measured through performance measures that tie as closely as possible to customer outcomes. Performance data becomes an important factor in future planning. Drives Budget Resources are allocated according to strategic priorities. Successful programs, as determined through performance measures, receive more resources. PERFORMANCE SYSTEM PRINCIPLES A summary of the City’s performance management system is highlighted in the following graphic: Performance Measurement & Management Annual Budget DR A F T 19 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT & MANAGEMENT ANNUAL BUDGET The 2016-2017 Work Plan and Operating Budget carry out the policy objectives set forth in the city’s long term planning documents. Work plans identify key projects the City hopes to accomplish during the two-year budget cycle. The City Council discusses work plan progress during quarterly business meetings with staff. The city-wide work plan, developed by staff and the City Council, sets the stage for budget development. Each of the primary areas of the 2016-17 Work Plan is summarized below with specific key performance indicators and related goals. FOCUSED REDEVELOPMENT Redevelopment and renewal of the commercial and residential areas is essential to the ongoing health of the community. The City is continuing to focus on the revitalization of two important commercial areas — Southdale and Grandview — as well as nurturing the vibrant 50th and France commercial area. There are also numerous proposed redevelopment opportunities that will need to be addressed in the coming years such as Pentagon Park, the Hennepin County Library Site and the former Fred Richards Golf course. The Pentagon Park redevelopment has the potential to be the most significant redevelopment project in Edina since the completion of Centennial Lakes in the late 1980s. The redevelopment process of these sites should consider the potential cumulative impact — both positive and negative — on streets and streetscape, transportation, utilities and other services, and nearby single family homes. Tax increment financing and other tools may be used to provide incentives to develop in ways consistent with the City’s land use, transit, density and health goals. Key Performance Indicator #1 Complete redevelopment planning for City’s former Public Works site Goals Complete operational and funding studies by 5/31/16. Reach decision with respect to type and scale of community use by 6/30/16. Conduct referendum regarding community use by 8/31/16. If approved, secure development partners by 12/31/16. If approved, secure zoning entitlements by 6/30/17. If approved, secure financing by 12/31/17. If approved, complete construction by 12/31/19. Key Performance Indicator #2 Complete district-wide planning activities for Grandview District Goals Consider establishing TIF District by 3/1/16. Complete transportation study by 5/31/16. Complete preliminary study of Highway 100 “Lid” by 12/31/17. Promote redevelopment of commercial sites and review any proposals. DR A F T 20 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT & MANAGEMENT ANNUAL BUDGET FOCUSED REDEVELOPMENT (cont.) Key Performance Indicator #3 Adopt strategy to redevelop City-owned property on W. 49-1/2 Street Goals Complete demand and usage study of public parking by 2/1/16. Implement redevelopment strategy by 3/1/16. Key Performance Indicator #4 Implement Phase 1 & 2 of Pentagon Park Redevelopment (The Link) Goals Consider final rezoning of South Parcel by 6/30/16. Proceed with Phase 1A improvements by 6/30/17. Proceed with Phase 1B improvements by 6/30/16. Proceed with Phase 2 improvements by 6/30/17. Clarify TIF contribution and amend redevelopment agreement as needed. Key Performance Indicator #5 Adopt and implement reuse plan for Fred Richards Park Goals Fred Richards Master Plan adopted and financing secured by 12/31/16. First phase of Fred Richards Master Plan implemented by 12/31/17. Key Performance Indicator #6 Work in partnership with Hennepin County to redevelop Southdale Regional Library site Complete redevelopment partnership agreement with Hennepin County by 5/31/16. Complete vision process for the site by 9/30/16. Solicit proposals to redevelop the site with new public library and other compatible uses by 10/31/16. Submit redevelopment proposal for review of Hennepin County by 1/30/17. Goals DR A F T 21 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT & MANAGEMENT ANNUAL BUDGET FUTURE PLANNING Vision Edina established a long term strategic framework to guide our community’s development over two decades. The future holds both great opportunities and challenges as Edina residents seek to preserve what has made the community successful in the past, while reinventing itself to meet the needs of future generations. Residents have made it clear that they believe forward looking planning is critical to the community’s success. The next Comprehensive Plan will be the first opportunity to translate Vision Edina into actionable goals with respect to land use, transportation, water resource management, parks, energy and environment, housing and heritage preservation. Key Performance Indicator #1 Complete draft Comprehensive Plan document with broad community input Goals Outline of Comprehensive Plan process developed and adopted by 2/28/16. Issue RFP for consulting partner(s) by 9/31/16 and consultant partner(s) identified by 12/31/16. Evaluate the use of multiple single family residential zoning districts by 12/31/17. Community engagement process and draft comprehensive plan completed by 12/31/17 with final plan review in 2018. Key Performance Indicator #2 Development of necessary tools to guide and evaluate redevelopment in the Southdale Area Southdale development guidelines completed and adopted by 3/31/16. Public infrastructure, density and transit study completed by 3/31/16. Southdale area design guidelines and full pedestrian plan completed by 7/1/16. Explore potential for Southdale area special services district by 12/31/17. Goals DR A F T 22 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT & MANAGEMENT ANNUAL BUDGET INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS Achieving many of our goals will require strong intergovernmental relationships. Vision Edina participants identified both education and transportation as critical drivers of future success. In both of these areas, the city must effectively partner with other government entities to promote effective outcomes. Besides the indicators listed, staff members will continue to meet and share information with border cities of Edina. Key Performance Indicator #1 Work to mitigate disruption of aviation noise Goals Formalize relationship with Minneapolis and St. Louis Park and establish joint goals by 3/31/16. Report updates quarterly. Advocate for implementation of the MAC’s Runway Use System plan at MSP airport as a noise abatement measure. Key Performance Indicator #2 Secure MnDOT and Hennepin County funding for key transportation improvements that impact Edina Goals Secure funding for significant interchange improvements at France Avenue and Highway 62. Create plan and timetable for County improvements to Vernon Avenue, west of Highway 100. Work with MnDOT officials to mitigate impacts to Edina residents with the temporary closing of Hwy. 169 for the bridge replacement project. Gain support of MnDOT and State Legislators to study “The Lid” project over T.H. 100 in 2016. Key Performance Indicator #3 Develop positive working relationships with school districts within City of Edina limits Goals Schedule two joint Council-School Board meetings each year with ISD #273 Assign staff to monitor opportunities and issues with Hopkins ISD #270 and Richfield ISD #280, and invite superintendents to provide City Council update annually. Schedule joint City-School District leadership meetings twice per year with ISD #273. Develop formal partnership between Edina Community Education and Edina Parks and Recreation with a goal of providing joint programming and public information materials. Key Performance Indicator #4 Expand the City’s presence with partners working towards regional development and planning Goals Maintain active role with Greater MSP and DEED to promote business development and planning. Work cooperatively with Metropolitan Council to pursue shared goals related to infrastructure, transportation and housing affordability. DR A F T 23 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT & MANAGEMENT ANNUAL BUDGET Key Performance Indicator #2 Expected level of service is defined and maintained in the Southdale Area Goals Develop plans for reconstruction of water treatment plant #5 by 12/31/16. Begin construction on water treatment plant #5 in 2017. Complete Southdale sanitary trunk capacity study by 12/31/16. Implement result of Southdale sanitary trunk capacity study by 12/31/17. Key Performance Indicator #3 Ensure that the longevity of useful street life is extended in the most fiscally responsible manner possible Goals Convert opportunity from debt retirement in 2017 into funding for the capital improvement program. Consider increasing franchise fees to support street pavement longevity program by 12/31/16. Prepare for street and infrastructure improvements as site plans for Pentagon Park are approved through 12/31/17. TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE The City is committed to preserving and expanding infrastructure systems to maintain reliability and quality, and to meet the demands of redevelopment. This will be accomplished through a long-term financing plan that balances prudence and community expectations. Vision Edina highlights residents’ strong desire to expand the variety of transportation options both to reduce the dependency on automobiles, and also to enhance the community’s ease of connectivity. Adoption of the Living Streets Plan was an important step forward, but significant work has yet to be done. Key Performance Indicator #1 Identify and complete necessary transportation improvements in the Grandview District Goals Partner with Metro transit to identify site for Park and Ride and secure funding by 12/31/17. Complete transportation study by 5/31/16 for the district. Develop plan for better access/ramps at Hwy. 100 by 12/31/17. Evaluate striping and implementation of pedestrian improvements on Vernon between Hwy. 100 and 53rd Street. Complete construction of shared street linking Eden Avenue to north side of railroad track in conjunction with former public works site redevelopment. DR A F T 24 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT & MANAGEMENT ANNUAL BUDGET Key Performance Indicator #2 All enterprise facilities achieve a certain net income or maximum subsidy on an annual basis Goals All enterprise facilities report their quarterly business plan updates. Target net income/maximum subsidy and Cost Recovery Expectation (CRE) is identified for each enterprise facility by 2/1/16. Setting a goal is not the main thing. It is deciding how you will go about achieving it and staying with that plan. - Tom Landry ENTERPRISE STABILITY Edina’s enterprises – Art Center, Braemar Golf, Braemar Arena, Braemar Field, Centennial Lakes Park, and Edinborough Park -represent important community amenities. Revenues from Edina Liquor help to defray some of the operating and capital for these enterprises. While still highly profitable, Edina Liquor is generat- ing less revenue with the entry of a new national competitor in the local liquor market. A high level of cost recovery at the enterprise facilities ensures that community resources are being well used and the general tax payers are not heavily subsidizing amenities used by a select group. However, cost recovery at the en- terprise facilities also involves careful policy considerations with respect to access, partnerships and types of use. Key Performance Indicator #1 All enterprise funds have business plans approved and in use Goals Complete marketing plans for each enterprise on an annual basis Create coordinated marketing and cross promotion plan for all enterprise facilities by 6/30/16. Explore centralized services model for staffing, marketing, purchasing, weddings/events by 12/31/16. Explore expansion of food and liquor sales to create more varied customer and corporate outing experiences by 12/31/16. DR A F T 25 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The City of Edina currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and local indicators point to continued stability. The region, noted for strong retail and professional sectors, has enjoyed considerable redevelopment in recent years. The City employment base is populated with a healthy combination of retail, professional and light industrial businesses. The City does not rely solely on a single sector of employment and is able to weather fluctuations in national and international economic changes better than most municipalities. Major industries with headquarters or divisions within Edina include Fairview Southdale Hospital, Southdale Center and Galleria regional malls, Spartan Nash (formerly Nash Finch), Regis, Filmtec (Dow) and International Dairy Queen. Edina’s robust business community is based in three primary nodes: 50th & France, Greater Southdale and a professional/industrial district adjacent to Highway 100. Numerous employers in the medical, retail, service, manufacturing and distribution industries are located in Edina. Edina is home to approximately 50,000 jobs that are expected to remain stable over the coming years. The City contains at least 2.5 million square feet of retail space plus an amount more than twice that of general com- mercial and industrial space. These businesses occupy facilities ranging from free-standing, wood-frame structures to non-combustible high-rise structures. The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development estimates that Edina’s unemployment rates are consistently lower than comparable state and national rates, as shown in the chart above. Edina’s unemployment rate has remained under 5% since mid-2012 (not seasonally adjusted). 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Ja n ‐06 Ju n ‐06 No v ‐06 Ap r ‐07 Se p ‐07 Fe b ‐08 Ju l ‐08 De c ‐08 Ma y ‐09 Oc t ‐09 Ma r ‐10 Au g ‐10 Ja n ‐11 Ju n ‐11 No v ‐11 Ap r ‐12 Se p ‐12 Fe b ‐13 Ju l ‐13 De c ‐13 Ma y ‐14 Oc t ‐14 Ma r ‐15 Unemployment Rates Edina unemployment MN unemployment US unemployment Economic Outlook DR A F T 26 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ECONOMIC OUTLOOK In additional to commercial and industrial redevelopment, the City of Edina continues to remain relevant and desirable to current and new residents. Edina has long been known for its residential housing stock, attractive neighborhoods and high quality of life. Although the emphasis has changed over the years from exclusively single-family housing to a more balanced mix of single and multi-family housing types, the City’s concern for overall quality in residential development remains a top priority. Single-family housing demolition permits is one measure used track the recent growth in residential redevelopment in Edina: Property values in Edina have been more stable than much of the rest of the state and country during the past several years. While our total market value and tax capacity began to fall around 2009, the declines were moderate compared to some other communities. Beginning in 2013, we have begun to see these values trend in the other direction, with continued increases estimated through 2016 according to the preliminary tax capacity reports from Hennepin County. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 2014201320122011201020092008200720062005 Single-Family Housing Demolition Permits DR A F T 27 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Tax capacity is a unique property taxing tool that is equivalent to multiplying the taxable market value of a property by its relevant class rate. The local tax rate of a taxing jurisdiction is determined by dividing the jurisdiction’s levy by the jurisdiction’s taxable net tax capacity. Rates often move in the opposite direction of tax capacity as shown in the chart above. Edina’s tax capacity rate is the lowest among our geographical neighboring communities. The City’s tax capacity has grown in recent years and is expected to see significant, continued growth in the coming years. The net tax capacity for the City of Edina grew by 14% from 2014 to 2015 after adjusting for tax increment valuation and fiscal disparities contribution and distribution. The estimated market value of the City of Edina increased by 7.8% during the same time period, from $9,065,549,600 to $9,837,972,300. This growth in estimated market value and the tax capacity of Edina can be primarily contributed to redevelopment activities taking place in the Southdale area as well as redevelopment occurring in residential neighborhoods, as mentioned on page 25 of this document. A significant source of revenue for the City of Edina that is directly related to economic conditions is the receipt of building permits from builders and developers of residential and commercial buildings. The City has budgeted conservatively in recent years due to the volatile nature of the revenue source. Since 2011, the City has budgeted on average $2.7 million annually for building permit revenue. Actual revenue has increased 19% annually on average since 2011. The City has budgeted a 5% increase in 2016 from 2015. City staff will closely monitor construction activity in order to adjust the estimated revenue from building permits in future years. One other area of concern for City staff is the cost of our insurance. Like most private businesses and employers, the City buys many types of insurance; including property, auto, liability, worker’s comp, and health insurance. Like energy, insurance cost is a significant factor in the City’s budget and pricing also has been volatile over the past several years. The City periodically tests the market for the different types of insurance we buy to make sure the rates we pay are competitive for the coverage and services we expect. However, in areas like health insurance, every provider is raising prices and all employers are experiencing similar price pressures. The City mitigates some of the pressure by purchasing health insurance together with a group of other cities to increase our collective purchasing power. Also, the City of Edina shares the cost of health insurance with our employees, who sometimes must make significant contributions to their monthly premiums, depending on their benefit selections. ECONOMIC OUTLOOK 20 22 24 26 28 30 ‐ 20,000,000 40,000,000 60,000,000 80,000,000 100,000,000 120,000,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Tax Capacity & Tax Capacity Rate Tax capacity Tax capacity rate DR A F T 28 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The City implemented a two-year budget cycle beginning with the 2012-2013 operating budget. The objective is to take an alternating year approach to the operating budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) processes. While both the operating budget and CIP will be reviewed every year, the majority of our planning, focus and effort will alternate between the two. During odd-numbered years, the City’s focus will be on the operating budget. Extra efforts by staff members are dedicated to examining operating budgets and ensuring that they are sustainable and able to meet the goals of the City. The two-year operating budget that is created during odd-numbered years will take effect on Jan. 1 of the following even-numbered year. The CIP is reviewed, but only updated if necessary. During the spring and summer of 2015, the Finance Department worked with all City departments to create a budget that was reflective of the goals and priorities that the City Council identified earlier in the year. During these meetings, input was provided on trends and issues happening within each department and the City overall, especially as they relate to the operating budgets of each City department. During even-numbered years, the City’s focus will be on the CIP. Extra efforts are dedicated to reviewing the projects in the CIP and prioritizing them based on information available at the time. The operating budget is reviewed, but only updated if necessary. The City Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the fiscal year. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City’s financial planning and control. The budget is prepared by fund and by department. The City is empowered to levy a property tax on both real and personal property located within its boundaries. Budget Process DR A F T 29 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BUDGET PROCESS February 28, 2015 Council retreat to develop 2016-2017 City-Wide Work Plan themes. April 21, 2015 Council work session to introduce the City Manager’s proposed 2016-2017 City- Wide Work Plan. May 15, 2015 Department Heads finalize 2016-2017 budget requests. July 7, 2015 Council work session to review 2016 Utility Rate Study. July 8, 2015 The City’s Executive Leadership Team (ELT) reviews the 2016-2017 draft budget. July 21, 2015 Council work session to introduce the City Manager’s proposed 2016-2017 City- Wide Work Plan and Budget. August 18, 2015 Council work session to review proposed 2016-2017 Budgets. September 1, 2015 Council adopts a formal resolution to set the 2016 preliminary levy and budget. According to Minnesota State law, the final levy can be lower than the preliminary levy, but not higher. September 16, 2015 Council adopts a formal resolution to set new water/sewer connection charges and utility rates based on the 2016 Utility Rate Study. November 4, 2015 Council work session to review final proposed 2016-2017 Budgets and Work Plans. December 1, 2015 Public Hearing on the 2016 operating budget and levy at a City Council Meeting. December 15, 2015 Council adopts a formal resolution to adopt the final 2016 Budget and property tax levy. Summer/Fall 2016 City Council and staff will work together to develop the 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Exact dates will be determined in Spring 2016. Summer/Fall 2016 City Council and staff will work together to make any necessary changes to the 2017 Budget and Work Plan. Exact dates will be determined in Spring 2016. December 6, 2016 Hold a Public Hearing on the 2017 operating budget and levy at a City Council Meeting. December 20, 2016 Council adopts a formal resolution to adopt the final 2017 Budget and property tax levy. 2016-2017 BUDGET PROCESS TIMELINE DR A F T DR A F T For living, learning, raising families, and doing business. City of Edina EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DR A F T 32 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The 2016-2017 Budget provides the resources to achieve key results for Edina residents around work plan themes set by the City Council. The work plan themes for 2016-2017 are: Focused Redevelopment Future Planning Intergovernmental Relations Transportation & Infrastructure Enterprise Stability This budget is a continuation of the budget transformation process that began in 2011 when the City switched to a two -year budget cycle and strived to provide increased accountability and transparency into City operations through the budget document itself. This budget is organized both by fund (see section III) and by department (section IV). The fund level section shows all expenditures by department as well as by type. The departmental organization gives insight into service and programs that each one delivers and also reflects organizational changes that have occurred during the last budget cycle. The 2016-2017 City budget proposal provides funding to continue existing service levels and addresses the new themes identified by the City Council. Some of these priorities and projects include transportation studies, sewer capacity studies and the construction of a new water treatment plant. The creation of a new comprehensive plan draft is also included to ensure that future planning is adequately addressed. There were also priorities that had to be left out due to budgetary challenges. The most significant challenge facing this budget is the decrease in transfers from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund which increases the City’s reliance on property tax revenue. The 2016 budgeted Liquor transfer is about $1.1 M less across all funds than what was budgeted in 2015, with approximately $650,000 of the decrease impacting the General Fund. It is important to note that the liquor operations are still profitable and generate the second most sales out of any municipal liquor operation in the State of Minnesota. Like the previous budget book, this one includes performance measures from each division that assists staff and elected officials in identifying services and programs that are effective and also those that are in need of improvements. Many of the performance measures are based on the quality of life survey that is administered every other year. Please note, that in 2015 a new company administered the survey used different methods from previous surveys. These methods included online surveys instead of telephone conversations. Online surveys statistically score lower than telephone surveys due to the anonymous nature of online surveys. The City of Edina consistently scored higher than other benchmark communities where quality of life surveys were delivered by the same company, both in Minnesota and across the country. The 2016-2017 City budget proposal is financially sound and operationally transparent. Through its implementation, the budget will continue to produce an exceptional quality of life for Edina residents. 2016-2017 Overview DR A F T 33 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX LEVIES ANNUAL BUDGET— ALL YEARS Property Tax Levies Budget Budget 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 General Fund Levies General Operating Levy 21,824,894$ 22,509,403$ 22,933,958$ 25,023,952$ 26,360,319$ General Fund Subtotal 21,824,894 22,509,403 22,933,958 25,023,952 26,360,319 Increase From Prior Year (%)1.02% 3.14% 1.89% 9.11% 5.34% Arts and Culture Fund Levies Arts and Culture - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 Arts and Culture Fund Subtotal - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 Increase From Prior Year (%)0.00% 0.00% Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service 949,850 947,600 944,400 946,000 946,000 Gymnasium Debt Service 396,444 409,244 409,440 385,901 388,000 Fire Station Debt Service 431,544 441,944 441,940 443,000 443,000 Public Works Facility Debt Service 1,536,743 1,526,809 1,546,600 1,561,000 1,696,000 Park Bond Market Value Levy 615,837 627,800 618,600 571,650 - Sports Dome - - 1,168,000 1,167,620 1,162,500 Weber Woods NOTE 1 - - - - - Debt Service Fund Subtotal 3,930,418 3,953,397 5,128,980 5,075,171 4,635,500 Increase From Prior Year (%)7.63% 4.31% 29.74% -1.05% -8.66% Construction Fund Levies Equipment Levy 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 1,680,000 1,750,000 Construction Fund Subtotal 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 1,680,000 1,750,000 Increase From Prior Year (%)0.00% 0.00% 63.00% 3.89% 4.17% HRA Fund Levies HRA Operating Levy - - - - 95,000 HRA Fund Subtotal - - - - 95,000 Increase From Prior Year (%) Total Property Tax Levy 26,747,384$ 27,454,872$ 29,700,010$ 31,799,123$ 32,860,819$ Increase From Prior Year (%)1.90% 2.65% 8.18% 7.07% 3.34% NOTE 1:The City made an offer to purchase a portion of Weber Woods from the City of Minneapolis. The financing plan for the purchase was not completed or approved by the publication date for this document. One possibility for financing the purchase would be a new tax levy beginning in 2017. If that option is chosen, the percentages shown here could increase. DR A F T 34 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CONSOLIDATED BUDGET SUMMARY ANNUAL BUDGET— ALL FUNDS AND YEARS This page represents all of the financial activities of the City consolidated into one place. It is the best way to look at the overall budget. The City also divides the budget into fund types, funds and departments. This data is presented farther back in the budget book. Consolidated Budget Summaries 2014 2015 2016 2017 Actual Budget Budget Budget REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 26,988,493$ 29,700,010$ 31,799,123$ 7.1% 32,860,819$ 3.3% Reductions - (123,000) - -100.0%- NA Net tax revenue 26,988,493 29,577,010 31,799,123 7.5% 32,860,819 3.3% Tax increments 5,052,705 100,000 2,500,000 2400.0% 2,500,000 0.0% Franchise fees & other taxes 2,066,697 2,070,000 2,315,000 11.8% 2,365,000 2.2% Special assessments 4,606,010 3,992,997 4,127,890 3.4% 3,878,724 -6.0% Licenses and permits 4,583,183 3,880,080 4,113,160 6.0% 4,282,660 4.1% Intergovernmental 4,294,999 5,169,825 4,739,550 -8.3% 1,468,550 -69.0% Charges for services 4,270,720 4,019,494 4,025,310 0.1% 11,327,973 181.4% Fines and forfeitures 1,163,907 950,000 975,000 2.6% 975,000 0.0% Operating revenue 39,886,753 42,823,745 41,990,893 -1.9% 41,619,956 -0.9% Investment income 632,025 463,956 390,737 -15.8% 380,389 -2.6% Other revenue 1,470,153 1,188,448 743,311 -37.5% 744,711 0.2% Debt issued 21,483,096 4,599,895 3,852,396 -16.3% 3,193,204 -17.1% Other financing sources 70,603 - - NA - NA TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 116,569,344 98,835,450 101,572,370 2.8% 105,596,986 4.0% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 23,125,572 17,963,799 18,464,763 2.8% 26,889,373 45.6% Communications & tech. 1,205,409 1,506,574 1,853,747 23.0% 1,744,217 -5.9% Human resources 979,873 692,387 1,455,345 110.2% 1,477,755 1.5% Finance 1,015,847 1,191,299 1,182,017 -0.8% 1,190,149 0.7% Public works 24,976,826 22,913,578 25,066,316 9.4% 25,841,762 3.1% Engineering 7,796,629 13,926,591 11,481,525 -17.6% 7,495,789 -34.7% Police 11,081,717 11,764,823 12,449,166 5.8% 12,331,502 -0.9% Fire 6,965,287 7,134,947 8,152,253 14.3% 7,933,806 -2.7% Parks & recreation 13,120,262 13,244,427 12,549,735 -5.2% 11,724,142 -6.6% Community development 1,543,486 1,742,160 1,771,945 1.7% 2,134,977 20.5% Debt service 6,020,022 6,654,894 7,552,545 13.5% 7,620,640 0.9% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 97,830,930 98,735,479 101,979,357 3.3% 106,384,112 4.3% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold 10,440,199 10,696,828 9,761,579 -8.7% 9,803,441 0.4% Personal services 31,436,152 32,759,604 34,314,636 4.7% 34,778,149 1.4% Contractual services 15,438,487 14,253,910 16,658,674 16.9% 17,302,851 3.9% Commodities 3,591,254 3,853,162 4,189,290 8.7%4,069,465 -2.9% Central services 4,872,724 5,154,924 5,278,548 2.4%5,445,204 3.2% Equipment 1,468,320 1,746,978 2,113,177 21.0% 1,024,054 -51.5% Capital outlay 18,414,824 17,395,224 14,878,386 -14.5% 18,841,300 26.6% Depreciation 5,198,570 5,471,750 6,538,750 19.5% 6,913,750 5.7% Debt service 6,970,400 7,403,099 8,246,317 11.4% 8,205,898 -0.5% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 97,830,930 98,735,479 101,979,357 3.3% 106,384,112 4.3% CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION 18,738,414 99,971 (406,987) (787,126) FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - JANUARY 1 128,897,358 147,635,772 147,735,743 147,328,756 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 147,635,772$ 147,735,743$ 147,328,756$ 146,541,630$ DR A F T 35 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINED BUDGET SUMMARY — 2014 Actual and 2015 Budget This page is a bridge to combine more detailed data found on pages 54-57 in the Fund Level Financial Schedules section of the budget book. The summary totals agree with the Consolidated Budget Summary presented previously. Combined Budget Summary Governmental Enterprise Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Total Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 26,988,493$ -$ 26,988,493$ 29,700,010$ -$ 29,700,010$ Reductions - - - (123,000) - (123,000) Net tax revenue 26,988,493 - 26,988,493 29,577,010 - 29,577,010 Tax increments 5,052,705 - 5,052,705 100,000 - 100,000 Franchise fees & other taxes 2,066,697 - 2,066,697 2,070,000 - 2,070,000 Special assessments 4,606,010 - 4,606,010 3,992,997 - 3,992,997 Licenses and permits 4,583,183 - 4,583,183 3,880,080 - 3,880,080 Intergovernmental 3,961,509 333,490 4,294,999 5,053,825 116,000 5,169,825 Charges for services 4,270,720 - 4,270,720 4,019,494 - 4,019,494 Fines and forfeitures 1,163,907 - 1,163,907 950,000 - 950,000 Operating revenue - 39,886,753 39,886,753 - 42,823,745 42,823,745 Investment income 440,051 191,974 632,025 327,400 136,556 463,956 Other revenue 1,382,927 87,226 1,470,153 1,128,921 59,527 1,188,448 Transfers 1,404,975 10,740,225 12,145,200 1,065,100 1,212,178 2,277,278 Debt issued 21,483,096 - 21,483,096 4,599,895 - 4,599,895 Other financing sources 70,603 - 70,603 - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 77,474,876 51,239,668 128,714,544 56,764,722 44,348,006 101,112,728 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION Administration 10,738,720 12,386,852 23,125,572 5,457,275 12,506,524 17,963,799 Communication & tech. 1,205,409 - 1,205,409 1,506,574 - 1,506,574 Human resources 979,873 - 979,873 692,387 - 692,387 Finance 769,429 246,418 1,015,847 904,918 286,381 1,191,299 Public works 11,592,570 13,384,256 24,976,826 9,563,518 13,350,060 22,913,578 Engineering 7,695,242 101,387 7,796,629 13,749,591 177,000 13,926,591 Police 10,606,581 475,136 11,081,717 11,323,415 441,408 11,764,823 Fire 6,965,287 - 6,965,287 7,134,947 - 7,134,947 Parks & recreation 3,603,413 9,516,849 13,120,262 2,654,087 10,590,340 13,244,427 Community development 1,543,486 - 1,543,486 1,742,160 - 1,742,160 Debt service 6,020,022 - 6,020,022 6,654,894 - 6,654,894 Transfers 11,010,200 1,135,000 12,145,200 327,178 1,950,100 2,277,278 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 72,730,232 37,245,898 109,976,130 61,710,944 39,301,813 101,012,757 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold - 10,440,199 10,440,199 - 10,696,828 10,696,828 Personal services 24,128,271 7,307,881 31,436,152 25,023,800 7,735,804 32,759,604 Contractual services 6,320,388 9,118,099 15,438,487 4,822,492 9,431,418 14,253,910 Commodities 1,730,677 1,860,577 3,591,254 1,880,062 1,973,100 3,853,162 Central services 3,637,530 1,235,194 4,872,724 3,860,316 1,294,608 5,154,924 Equipment 1,468,320 - 1,468,320 1,746,978 - 1,746,978 Capital outlay 18,414,824 - 18,414,824 17,395,224 - 17,395,224 Depreciation - 5,198,570 5,198,570 - 5,471,750 5,471,750 Debt service 6,020,022 950,378 6,970,400 6,654,894 748,205 7,403,099 Transfers 11,010,200 1,135,000 12,145,200 327,178 1,950,100 2,277,278 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 72,730,232 37,245,898 109,976,130 61,710,944 39,301,813 101,012,757 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION 4,744,644 13,993,770 18,738,414 (4,946,222) 5,046,193 99,971 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - JANUARY 1 45,292,135 83,605,223 128,897,358 50,036,779 97,598,993 147,635,772 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 50,036,779$ 97,598,993$ 147,635,772$ 45,090,557$ 102,645,186$ 147,735,743$ 2015 Budget2014 Actual DR A F T 36 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMBINED BUDGET SUMMARY COMBINED BUDGET SUMMARY — 2016 Budget and 2017 Budget This page is a bridge to combine more detailed data found on pages 58-61 in the Fund Level Financial Schedules section of the budget book. The summary totals agree with the Consolidated Budget Summary presented previously. Governmental Enterprise Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Total Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 31,799,123$ -$ 31,799,123$ 32,860,819$ -$ 32,860,819$ Reductions - - - - - - Net tax revenue 31,799,123 - 31,799,123 32,860,819 - 32,860,819 Tax increments 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 Franchise fees 2,315,000 - 2,315,000 2,365,000 - 2,365,000 Special assessments 4,127,890 - 4,127,890 3,878,724 - 3,878,724 Licenses and permits 4,113,160 - 4,113,160 4,282,660 - 4,282,660 Intergovernmental 4,442,550 297,000 4,739,550 1,356,550 112,000 1,468,550 Charges for services 4,025,310 - 4,025,310 11,327,973 - 11,327,973 Fines and forfeitures 975,000 - 975,000 975,000 - 975,000 Operating revenue - 41,990,893 41,990,893 - 41,619,956 41,619,956 Investment income 277,500 113,237 390,737 262,500 117,889 380,389 Other revenue 721,811 21,500 743,311 723,211 21,500 744,711 Transfers 2,930,628 500,000 3,430,628 2,983,625 600,000 3,583,625 Debt issued 3,852,396 - 3,852,396 3,193,204 - 3,193,204 Other financing sources - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 62,080,368 42,922,630 105,002,998 66,709,266 42,471,345 109,180,611 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION Administration 6,702,645 11,762,118 18,464,763 14,863,687 12,025,686 26,889,373 Communication & tech. 1,853,747 - 1,853,747 1,744,217 - 1,744,217 Human resources 790,345 665,000 1,455,345 812,755 665,000 1,477,755 Finance 883,624 298,393 1,182,017 880,745 309,404 1,190,149 Public works 10,282,436 14,783,880 25,066,316 10,465,889 15,375,873 25,841,762 Engineering 11,242,429 239,096 11,481,525 7,252,535 243,254 7,495,789 Police 11,952,196 496,970 12,449,166 11,823,778 507,724 12,331,502 Fire 8,152,253 - 8,152,253 7,933,806 - 7,933,806 Parks & recreation 1,720,447 10,829,288 12,549,735 1,896,251 9,827,891 11,724,142 Community development 1,771,945 - 1,771,945 2,134,977 - 2,134,977 Debt service 7,552,545 - 7,552,545 7,620,640 - 7,620,640 Transfers 2,630,628 800,000 3,430,628 2,733,625 850,000 3,583,625 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 65,535,240 39,874,745 105,409,985 70,162,905 39,804,832 109,967,737 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold - 9,761,579 9,761,579 - 9,803,441 9,803,441 Personal services 26,239,843 8,074,793 34,314,636 27,206,809 7,571,340 34,778,149 Contractual services 6,033,051 10,625,623 16,658,674 6,496,070 10,806,781 17,302,851 Commodities 2,162,014 2,027,276 4,189,290 2,208,623 1,860,842 4,069,465 Central services 3,925,596 1,352,952 5,278,548 4,031,784 1,413,420 5,445,204 Equipment 2,113,177 - 2,113,177 1,024,054 - 1,024,054 Capital outlay 14,878,386 - 14,878,386 18,841,300 - 18,841,300 Depreciation - 6,538,750 6,538,750 - 6,913,750 6,913,750 Debt service 7,552,545 693,772 8,246,317 7,620,640 585,258 8,205,898 Transfers 2,630,628 800,000 3,430,628 2,733,625 850,000 3,583,625 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 65,535,240 39,874,745 105,409,985 70,162,905 39,804,832 109,967,737 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION (3,454,872) 3,047,885 (406,987) (3,453,639) 2,666,513 (787,126) FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - JANUARY 1 45,090,557 102,645,186 147,735,743 41,635,685 105,693,071 147,328,756 FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION - DECEMBER 31 41,635,685$ 105,693,071$ 147,328,756$ 38,182,046$ 108,359,584$ 146,541,630$ 2016 Budget 2017 Budget DR A F T 37 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA EMPLOYEES ANNUAL BUDGET The City highly values its staff members and realizes how critical they are in delivering the high level of services Edina residents have come to know. The City’s annual payroll constitutes approximately 35% of the consolidated budget and is over $30 million per year when benefits are included. According to a Quality of Life survey conducted in 2015, 78% of Edina residents rated the overall quality of services provided by the City as “Excellent” or “Good”. During 2012-2014, the City underwent a significant reorganization to maximize staff’s ability to be productive and effective. The reorganization did not substantially change the overall number of City employees. The chart on the next page shows full-time City employment over time. The full-time (FT) employee count has increased by 2 since the last budget cycle. One of the new employees will primarily be working in the new Conservation and Sustainability Fund which was established to make progress towards accomplishing the City’s environmental protection goals. Accordingly, this employee will be paid from revenue generated from the new fund; lessening the impact General Fund finances. In addition to FT staff, the City employs a significant number of part-time (PT) employees, including many on a seasonal basis. So, the total number of City employees is constantly changing, as depicted on the chart below. Over the course of a typical year, the City will employ about 1,000 people. - 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 City Employees During a Typical Year City of Edina Employees DR A F T 38 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA EMPLOYEES 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Administration General Fund 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 6.85 5.85 4.85 4.85 5.00 5.00 HRA Fund - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Liquor Fund 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 Communications and Technology Services General Fund 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.50 4.65 5.15 6.15 6.15 6.00 6.00 Central Services 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Community Development General Fund 10.75 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Engineering General Fund 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 10.50 12.00 10.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 PACS Fund - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CAS Fund - - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 Utilities Fund - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finance General Fund 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 Utilities Fund 1.75 2.75 2.75 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Liquor Fund 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 - - - - Fire Protection General Fund 40.50 40.50 40.50 39.50 39.75 42.75 42.85 43.85 45.90 45.90 Utilities Fund 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 - - Human Resources General Fund - - - - 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00 Parks & Recreation General Fund 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 8.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 Aquatic Center 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.60 0.60 Golf Course 13.00 13.00 13.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 8.05 8.05 Arena 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.85 4.85 Sports Dome - - - - - - - - 0.15 0.15 Art Center 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Edinborough Park 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.80 5.80 5.80 5.80 5.80 Centennial Lakes 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Police Protection General Fund 73.75 74.65 73.65 71.15 71.65 70.65 72.50 70.50 72.55 72.55 Utilities Fund 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.45 Public Works General Fund 48.40 47.40 47.40 47.20 48.20 46.40 43.35 43.35 43.45 43.45 Construction Fund 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 Utilities Fund 13.25 15.25 15.25 14.45 13.95 13.75 15.20 15.20 16.85 16.85 Central Services 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 11.00 11.00 10.25 10.25 Other 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - - - - - Total 278.00 281.00 280.00 274.00 278.00 281.00 285.00 285.00 287.00 287.00 Source: City of Edina Finance Department Notes: -Full-time employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. In a typical year the City will employ an additional 600-700 people in these categories. -The City completed a major departmental reorganization that is reflected on this chart between years 2012-2014. In some cases, data for years before the reorganization has been modified from what was originally reported to improve comparisons. Budgeted Full-time Employees for Fiscal Year DR A F T 39 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The City of Edina has many diverse sources of revenue. Most residents know that the City collects property taxes, franchise taxes and tax increments, but some people are surprised to learn that these taxes combined represent only about 37% of the City’s annual revenue. In Edina, there are many parks enterprise facilities that generate revenue, in addition to the Utility fund and Liquor fund which are also significant sources of the “Park enterprise sales” category in the chart below. Special assessments and licenses and permits are significant contributors to the City’s revenue, at about 4% each. Other sources include aid from federal and state government agencies, police fines, investment income, ambulance charges, park rentals and program registrations, donations, advertising sales, revenue earned from providing dispatch services to other communities, and many others. Property taxes account for $31,799,123 and $32,860,819 of the City’s budgeted revenue in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Property taxes are difficult to compare across jurisdictions due to differences in tax bases, growth and development issues, and the quantity as well as quality of services delivered. However, we believe Edina compares favorably according to the comparison on the following page with other Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) cities, which tend to share many similarities with Edina. This comparison chart on the next page shows what the buyer of a $400,000 home would pay to each City in annual taxes if the buyer would choose to live in that City. The buyer of a $400,000 home in Edina would pay the lowest City taxes in this comparison group. Taxes (all) 37% Utility sales 20% Liquor sales 13% Park enterprise sales 9% Licenses and permits 4% Special assessments 4%All others 13% Edina's Revenue Sources Revenues DR A F T 40 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REVENUES 1 Edina 1,086$ 2 Plymouth 1,138$ 3 Eden Prairie 1,386$ 4 Shoreview 1,391$ 5 Woodbury 1,434$ 6 Minnetonka 1,513$ 7 Eagan 1,519$ 8 Shakopee 1,531$ 9 Lakeville 1,553$ 10 Maple Grove 1,581$ 11 Burnsville 1,786$ 12 Bloomington 1,821$ 13 Maplewood 1,883$ 14 Apple Valley 1,887$ 15 Inver Grove Heights 1,937$ 16 Savage 2,123$ Source: LMC Property Tax calculator MLC Cities Comparison: 2015 estimated taxes on $400,000 house City Taxes All Districts Notes 1 Edina 1,086$ 5,305$ ISD#273 & WS #1 2 Eden Prairie 1,386$ 5,566$ ISD#272 & WS #4 3 Minnetonka 1,513$ 5,782$ ISD#276 & WS#3 4 Bloomington 1,821$ 5,976$ ISD#271 & WS#1 5 St. Louis Park 1,904$ 6,139$ ISD#283 & WS#3 6 Richfield 2,398$ 6,397$ ISD#280 & WS#3 7 Hopkins 2,433$ 6,719$ ISD#270 & WS#1 8 Minneapolis 2,748$ 6,651$ ISD#001 & WS#3 Source: LMC Property Tax calculator 2015 estimated taxes on $400,000 house The property buyer approach:DR A F T 41 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA REVENUES License and permit revenue is historically one of the most volatile revenue categories for the City, so our practice has been to budget for this revenue conservatively. License and permit revenue is collected primarily from builders and developers for residential or commercial building projects, but also includes smaller amounts for a variety of City- issued licenses, including liquor licenses, restaurant licenses, etc. The chart above shows the history of building permit revenue collected in the general fund. As of the publication date for this document, it appears 2016 will continue the trend from 2014-2015, and be another record year for building permit revenue. Special assessments include assessments levied against benefitting properties for various infrastructure improvements and street reconstruction projects. In a typical Edina street reconstruction project, benefitting properties are assessed the full cost of the street repairs. The City’s utility fund typically pays for costs related to underground water and sewer infrastructure as well as curbs and gutters. The special assessment process is guided by the City’s special assessment policy as well as state law for special assessments. Enterprise operating revenue is the largest source of City revenue according to the chart presented in the first part of this section. However, there are many smaller sources of revenue that contribute to this category. The largest part of enterprise operating revenue ($19.7M in 2016) comes from the Utility fund for sales of water, sewer, storm sewer and recycling services. The second largest part is sales of “off-sale” liquor at the three municipally owned liquor stores, which are budgeted to combine for about $12.4M in annual sales in 2016. Operating revenue is also collected at the aquatic center (about $1M), golf course (about $2.9M), ice arena (about $2.2M), art center ($450K), Edinborough Park (about $1.3 M) and Centennial Lakes Park (about $780K). The City’s financial advisor prepared a long-term rate study in the fall of 2015 that recommended 4.75% annual increases to water rates, 4.50% annual increases to sewer rates, and a 10% increase to storm sewer rates in 2016, with the annual increase thereafter dropping to 6.50%. The water and sewer increases are primarily to cover increasing costs of rebuilding, maintaining, and improving existing infrastructure. The storm increase is higher than previous years due to a one-time change to better align of costs for street sweeping into the storm fund from the general fund. These increases will ensure that enterprise funds are maintained in a healthy and sustainable manner. - 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 5,000,000 Edina Building Permit History Actual Budget DR A F T 42 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The City develops a five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) every two years in order to provide a framework for planning the preservation and expansion of infrastructure, facilities and equipment. The most recent CIP adopted by the City Council was for the years 2015-2019. The City’s threshold for projects or equipment to be included in the CIP is $15,000. Projects or equipment expected to be under the threshold are part of the operating budget. The definition of capital expenditures to be included in the CIP is not necessarily identical to the definition of capital assets for financial accounting purposes. The main difference is that the CIP may include maintenance expenditures that do not meet the GAAP definition of a capital asset. While prioritization has always been part of the CIP process, the City implemented a formal process that standardizes priorities across functions and departments beginning with the 2013-2017 CIP. The prioritization process considers strategic goals and objectives, which are set by the City Council and interpreted by City staff. The recommended CIP and priorities are then submitted back to the City Council for consideration, modification, and adoption. The City uses a 7-point numerical scale to prioritize our CIP, with the number 1 representing the most critical projects and the number 7 representing desirable projects. For projects prioritized in the first two years of the adopted CIP, City staff generally plans, develops and promotes the project until a construction contract is ready to be signed or a purchase over $20,000 is ready to be ordered from a vendor. These types of contracts and purchases receive a final approval by the City Council, according to our policy. The City recognizes that circumstances and priorities can change over time and in some cases may cause the timing of some projects to be moved forward or backward after adoption of the CIP. These changes are considered by the City Council on a case-by-case basis. Capital Improvements DR A F T 43 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The total capital expenditures planned for the 2016 and 2017 fiscal years by fund and priority level are as follows: The 2017 expenditures shown in this schedule will be reprioritized in the summer of 2016 and are subject to change based on that process. In fact, 2017 projects with a priority rating of 4 through 7 are not yet matched with available financing to proceed. Some of the City’s significant CIP projects planned in the next two years are: Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Program (Priority 1) Every year, the City reconstructs streets and underground utilities as resources allow. Costs of the program are extremely variable depending on how many neighborhoods are approved, the mileage and types of streets involved, and the scope of work that needs to be done. For 2016 and 2017, the total costs are estimated to be $11,900,000 and $10,100,000 respectively, when all aspects of the roadway and underground utilities are included. Funding for the pro- jects mostly comes from special assessments to benefitting properties and the utility fund. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Fund Priority 2016 2017 HRA 2 8,075,000$ 6,650,000$ PACS 1931,548 747,361 PACS 5-7 163,000 297,000 Construction Equipment 2,108,337 1,024,054 Construction 1-3 9,165,061 5,726,605 Construction 4-7 1,969,758 2,352,400 Environmental Efficiency 2104,000 - Utilities 1-3 10,251,239 5,531,625 Utilities 4-6 1,325,000 5,375,000 Liquor 480,000 - Aquatic Center 1135,000 120,000 Aquatic Center 5341,250 525,000 Golf 1-2 111,000 108,000 Golf 4-5 3,330,000 100,000 Arena 5-6 225,000 135,000 Edinborough 2-3 33,100 71,295 Edinborough 666,600 - Centennial 335,000 - Centennial 5- 50,000 Total Capital Expenditures 38,449,893$ 28,813,340$ DR A F T 44 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Comprehensive Plan (Priority 1) Per State law, cities must update their Comprehensive Plans every 10 years. The City’s most recent Comprehensive Plan was completed in 2008, and is a broad statement of community goals and policies that direct the orderly and coordinated physical development of a City into the future. It provides the framework for shaping future growth and change, for protecting what a community values, for enhancing what the community wants to improve, and for creating what the community feels is lacking. Expenses for this project will be incurred throughout 2016, 2017 and 2018, with total cost expected to be about $350,000. Funding is expected to be provided from the General Fund and Construction Fund in the amounts of $50,000 and $300,000, respectively. Elements of a Comprehensive Plan include: vision, goals and objective, community profile, land use, housing, heritage preservation, transportation, water resource management, parks, energy & environment, community services, and facilities. Golf Course Renovation (Priority 5) This project was included in the 2015-2019 CIP with a budget of $3,250,000 to be spent in 2016 to renovate the existing 27-Holes. Since the adoption of the 2015-2019 CIP the City Council has approved renovations to Golf Course facilities, expansion of the driving range, and renovation of the executive course. The facilities, driving range and 9-Hole renovations were completed in 2015 at an approximate cost of $2.4 million. These renovations were funded with proceeds from debt issued to be paid back over the next 15 years from Golf Course operating income. Construction of a new 18-hole regulation golf course that will stay within the existing footprint of the 27-hole course, with an alternate use for the remaining park property is set to begin in 2016, and be completed in 2018. Staff believes that an exceptional 18-hole course can be constructed within the 27-hole footprint, without expanding the footprint of Braemar Park. As of the publication date for this document, the construction cost for this project is expected to be about $6.4 million. A re-designed 18-hole course would be one of the best municipal courses in the region, and would have higher utilization than a 27-hole course resulting in improved profitability and reduced financial risk. Further impacts of this project are represented in the 2016-2017 Fund Level Financial Schedules (section III). New Water Treatment Plant 5 (Priority 6) This project includes the design of Water Treatment Plant 5 to be located on property previously acquired for this purpose along France Avenue just north of the Southdale water tower. This plant will filter water from wells 5, 18, and potentially future well 21. Permitting and design will take place in 2016 at an estimated cost of $500,000, and construction will take place from 2017 until mid 2018 at estimated costs of $3,500,000 and $4,000,000 respectively. Expansion of water system capacity is related to peak demand growth, and stable demand due to population growth. Funding will for this project will come from Utility Fund operating income. Paths and Trails The City’s Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund is used to finance the construction of new walking and biking facilities in the City, as well as the maintenance of existing ones. In 2016, the City plans to complete a variety of scheduled projects financed through the PACS Fund. Some of the more significant projects include the construction of new sidewalks on Cornelia Drive from 66th Street to 70th Street and on Xerxes Avenue from 56th Street to West 60th Street. There will also be a sidewalk constructed on Beard Avenue beginning at West 60th Street. DR A F T 45 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA LEGAL DEBT MARGIN Minnesota laws limit the amount of debt the City may issue to 3% of the assessor’s market value of the City’s tax base. The assessor’s 3% market value less net debt is referred to as the legal debt margin. The following table shows the legal debt margin at December 31, 2014. According to this calculation, the City has the ability to issue over $200 million in additional debt before reaching the statutory limit. This level of capacity to issue new debt means that the City is in a secure financial position. The City had four types of bonded debt outstanding on December 31, 2014: general obligation (GO) bonds, special assessment bonds, public project revenue bonds and enterprise revenue bonds. GO bonds are payable from general property taxes. The special assessment bonds include permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds and Edina emerald energy program bonds that are payable from special assessments with any deficiency in the PIR variety to be provided for by general property taxes. Public project revenue bonds are payable from annual appropriation lease payments received from the City of Edina pursuant to a lease between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City. Enterprise revenue bonds are payable primarily from revenue from the City’s enterprise facilities with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. Edina’s long-term debt is segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be repaid from business-type activities in the table on the following page, which projects changes in debt levels for the next two years. Market value (after fiscal disparities) Debt limit (3% of market value) Debt applicable to limit: General obligation bonds Public project revenue bonds Total debt applicable to limit Legal debt margin Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2014 267,350,840 21,560,000 215,590,840$ 8,911,694,683$ 30,200,000 51,760,000 Debt Service DR A F T 46 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DEBT SERVICE Year Ended Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Total P&I 2016 2,410,000 943,193 900,000 654,479 1,936,375 708,498 5,300,000 1,045,524 10,546,375 3,351,694 13,898,069 2017 2,475,000 859,818 905,000 633,629 2,116,375 630,818 5,540,000 889,582 11,036,375 3,013,847 14,050,222 2018 1,990,000 782,343 1,045,000 607,197 2,491,375 564,055 4,635,000 755,963 10,161,375 2,709,558 12,870,933 2019 2,065,000 710,270 1,080,000 574,566 2,418,369 494,999 4,775,000 633,317 10,338,369 2,413,152 12,751,521 2020 2,145,000 634,400 1,115,000 540,690 2,253,369 434,800 3,355,000 523,914 8,868,369 2,133,804 11,002,173 2021 2,215,000 554,586 1,145,000 505,649 1,418,369 389,340 3,440,000 428,027 8,218,369 1,877,602 10,095,971 2022 1,365,000 489,540 1,185,000 472,949 1,453,369 346,079 3,535,000 325,752 7,538,369 1,634,320 9,172,689 2023 1,415,000 440,691 1,220,000 438,951 1,238,369 301,205 2,350,000 234,527 6,223,369 1,415,374 7,638,743 2024 1,465,000 388,681 1,255,000 400,171 900,000 264,475 1,695,000 168,311 5,315,000 1,221,638 6,536,638 2025 1,520,000 333,358 1,295,000 360,981 925,000 234,875 1,100,000 123,502 4,840,000 1,052,716 5,892,716 2026 1,575,000 274,754 1,335,000 321,335 950,000 207,200 530,000 98,914 4,390,000 902,203 5,292,203 2027 1,640,000 211,608 1,000,000 285,006 980,000 178,250 545,000 82,311 4,165,000 757,175 4,922,175 2028 1,705,000 145,115 1,030,000 251,566 1,010,000 147,643 565,000 64,923 4,310,000 609,247 4,919,247 2029 1,335,000 84,261 875,000 220,088 1,040,000 115,112 585,000 46,694 3,835,000 466,155 4,301,155 2030 1,390,000 28,712 905,000 191,163 845,000 84,500 495,000 29,378 3,635,000 333,753 3,968,753 2031 - - 935,000 160,678 660,000 58,962 345,000 16,044 1,940,000 235,684 2,175,684 2032 - - 965,000 128,013 685,000 35,425 175,000 8,025 1,825,000 171,463 1,996,463 2033 - - 1,000,000 93,625 150,000 20,812 180,000 2,769 1,330,000 117,206 1,447,206 2034 - - 1,030,000 57,456 155,000 15,281 - - 1,185,000 72,737 1,257,737 2035 - - 1,070,000 19,393 160,000 9,375 - - 1,230,000 28,768 1,258,768 2036 - - - - 170,000 3,188 - - 170,000 3,188 173,188 26,710,000 6,881,330 21,290,000 6,917,585 23,955,970 5,244,892 39,145,000 5,477,477 111,100,970 24,521,284 135,622,254 General Obligation Bonds Public Project Revenue Special Assessment Bonds Revenue Bonds Total City 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 Balance Additions Reductions Balance Additions Reductions Balance Governmental activity debt: General obligation 26,710,000$ -$ (2,410,000)$ 24,300,000$ -$ (2,475,000)$ 21,825,000$ Special Assessment Bonds 23,955,970 3,852,396 (1,936,375) 25,871,991 3,193,204 (2,116,375) 26,948,820 Public project revenue 21,290,000 - (900,000) 20,390,000 - (905,000) 19,485,000 Subtotal 71,955,970 3,852,396 (5,246,375) 70,561,991 3,193,204 (5,496,375) 68,258,820 Business-type activity debt: Enterprise revenue 39,145,000 5,000,000 (5,300,000) 38,845,000 6,300,000 (5,540,000) 39,605,000 Citywide Grand Total 111,100,970$ 8,852,396$ (10,546,375)$ 109,406,991$ 9,493,204$ (11,036,375)$ 107,863,820$ 20172016 In addition to principal payments in the chart above, the city also pays interest on outstanding debt. Principal and interest payments are sometimes referred to collectively as debt service. Debt service to maturity on all outstanding debt as of December 31, 2015 is shown below. DR A F T 47 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DEBT SERVICE The City sets annual property tax levies to pay debt service on the debt types that are payable from general property taxes. The debt service levies are shown below, and are separated by purpose. Budget Budget Debt Service Tax Levies 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 City Hall 949,850$ 947,600$ 944,400$ 946,000$ 946,000$ Gymnasiums 396,444 409,244 409,440 385,901 388,000 Fire Station #1 431,544 441,944 441,940 443,000 443,000 Public Works Facility 1,536,743 1,526,809 1,546,600 1,561,000 1,696,000 Park Bond Market Value Levy 615,837 627,800 618,600 571,650 - Sports Dome - - 1,168,000 1,167,620 1,162,500 Total 3,930,418$ 3,953,397$ 5,128,980$ 5,075,171$ 4,635,500$ DR A F T DR A F T For living, learning, raising families, and doing business. City of Edina FUND LEVEL FINANCIAL SCHEDULES DR A F T 50 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA FUND ACCOUNTING The City is required to account for revenues and expenditures in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) in the United States of America as applied to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). GAAP allows the City to set up different funds for different purposes. The City of Edina uses two different types of funds; governmental and enterprise. Fund Descriptions City of Edina Consolidated Budget Governmental Funds General Fund (Major Fund) Special Revenue Funds HRA (Major Fund) CDBG Police SR Braemar Memorial Arts and Culture PACS CAS Debt Service (Major Fund) Capital Project Funds Construction (Major Fund) Environmental Efficiency Enterprise Funds Utility Fund (Major Fund) Risk Management Fund Liquor Fund (Major Fund) Park Enterprises Aquatic Center (Major Fund) Golf Course (Major Fund) Arena (Major Fund) Sports Dome Art Center Edinborough Centennial Lakes DR A F T 51 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FUND DESCRIPTIONS GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services like Police, Fire, Public Works, etc. These activities are often, but not always, supported by a mix of taxes and user fees. The City budgets and reports its governmental funds using the modified accrual basis of accounting, which is required by GAAP. Currently the City has eleven governmental funds: General Fund. This is the City’s primary operating fund. It records most of the City’s revenues and expenditures from core City operations like Administration, Police, Parks, etc. Any activities that are not specifically reported in a different fund can be found in the General Fund. The General Fund is not used for debt service or capital projects. Housing and Redevelopment Authority Fund (HRA). The HRA is an entity legally separate from the City. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported in a special revenue fund as if it were part of the City’s operations because the members of the City Council serve as HRA board members and its activity is confined to the same geographic borders as the City of Edina. Community Development Block Grant Fund (CDBG). This special revenue fund was established to account for funds received under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. Police Special Revenue Fund. This special revenue fund was established to account for funds received for specific purposes within the Police Department, including E-911 and forfeiture funds. Braemar Memorial Fund. This account was created in 1976 and formally recognized as a separate special revenue fund by the City Council in 2010. It is used to account for funds donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing the Braemar golf Course with equipment and amenities that might not otherwise be affordable or viewed as a necessity to the golf course. Arts and Culture Fund. This special revenue fund was established in 2014 to account for funds donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing public arts and culture related activities. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS). This special revenue fund was established in 2013 to account for funds received from gas and electric franchise fees, which the City Council intends to use for pedestrian and cyclist improvements included in future street reconstruction projects. Environmental Efficiency Fund. This fund was established in 2013 to account for funds received through energy cost savings to be reinvested in future energy efficiencies. Conservation and Sustainability Fund (CAS). This special revenue fund was established in 2015 to account for funds received from gas and electric franchise fees beginning in 2016. The City will use these funds to provide a dedicated funding source for new conservation and sustainability functionality and programs. The fund will pay for a dedicated staff person to carry out these initiatives. Debt Service Fund. This fund accounts for the payment of principal and interest on the City’s governmental debt. Construction Fund. This fund accounts for the various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and the Equipment Replacement Program. DR A F T 52 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUNDS In general, enterprise funds are used to account for activities that the City intends to be mostly self-supporting. The costs of providing these activities are often, but not always, recovered primarily through user charges, similar to private business enterprises. Some of the activities we categorize as enterprise funds receive regular support from other City funds. The City budgets and reports our enterprise funds using the full accrual basis of accounting, which is required by GAAP. Currently the City has eight enterprise funds: Utility Fund. This fund is used to account for water pumping, treatment and distribution as well as sanitary sewer collection and disposal, storm water collection and recycling services to the City’s residents. Liquor Fund. This fund accounts for the City’s off-sale liquor business, which Edina first started around 1948. To- day, there are three municipally owned liquor stores in Edina. Excess profits are generally transferred into other City funds. Aquatic Center Fund. This fund was established to account for the operations of the City’s outdoor municipal pool. Golf Course Fund. This fund was established to account for the City’s golf business when the 18-hole Braemar Golf Couse opened in 1964. Today, the City operates Braemar Golf Course (now a 27-hole regulation course), two 9-hole executive courses, a driving range, indoor golf dome, a banquet room and grill. Arena Fund. This fund was created around 1966 when Braemar Arena was built. Today, there are three indoor, regulation size ice sheets, including the original “West” arena. Sports Dome Fund. This fund was created in 2013 to account for the revenues and expenses for Braemar Field which was built in 2014. Art Center Fund. This fund accounts for the revenues and expenses for the Edina Art Center. Edinborough Park Fund. Edinborough Park’s finances were combined with Centennial Lakes Park in one fund through 2011. A separate fund for each facility was created in budget year 2012. Centennial Lakes Fund. Centennial Lakes Park’s finances were combined with Edinborough Park in one fund through 2011. A separate fund for each facility was created in budget year 2012. Risk Management Fund. This internal service fund was established to account for expenses related to the costs of insurance, safety and prevention measures, and risk management programs across all municipal departments. FUND DESCRIPTIONS DR A F T 53 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Appropriated? ADMIN CTS HR FIN PW ENG PD FD PR CD General Yes X X X X X X X X X X HRA Yes X PACS Yes X CDBG Yes X Police SR Yes X Braemar Memorial Yes X Debt Service Yes X X X X X X X X X X Construction Yes X X X X X X X X X X Utilities Yes X X X X X Liquor Yes X Aquatic Center Yes X Golf Course Yes X Arena Yes X Art Center Yes X Edinborough Yes X Centennial Yes X CAS Yes X Arts & Culture Yes X Environmental Efficiency Yes X X X X X X X X X X Sports Dome Yes X Risk Management Yes X Department Acronym Key ADMIN AdministraƟon CTS CommunicaƟons and Technology Services HR Human Resources FIN Finance PW Public Works ENG Engineering PD Police FD Fire PR Parks and RecreaƟon CD Community Development Operating Fund Crosswalk DR A F T 54 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The City uses two basic fund types to account for our financial activities, governmental fund types and enterprise fund types. In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services and enterprise funds are used to account for business-type activities. All of the City’s governmental funds are shown here. Braemar Arts & Debt Environmental General HRA PACS CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Efficiency Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 22,147,135$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,866,611$ -$ 974,747$ 26,988,493$ Reductions - - - - - - - - - - - Net tax revenue 22,147,135 - - - - - - 3,866,611 - 974,747 26,988,493 Tax increments - 5,052,705 - - - - - - - - 5,052,705 Franchise fees & other taxes 820,039 - 1,144,167 - - - - - - 102,491 2,066,697 Special assessments - - - - - - - 2,870,102 - 1,735,908 4,606,010 Licenses and permits 4,490,993 - - - - - - - - 92,190 4,583,183 Intergovernmental 1,197,284 - - 18,700 71,962 - - - - 2,673,563 3,961,509 Charges for services 4,236,442 - - - - - - - - 34,278 4,270,720 Fines and forfeitures 993,954 - - - 169,953 - - - - - 1,163,907 Investment income 144,127 158,945 7,790 - 201 4,258 62 11,408 6,630 106,630 440,051 Other revenue 1,326,443 - - - - 2,795 1,843 - - 51,846 1,382,927 Transfers - - - - - - 20,007 - - 1,384,968 1,404,975 Debt issued - - - - - - - 5,703,423 - 15,779,673 21,483,096 Other financing sources - - - - - - - - - 70,603 70,603 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 35,356,417 5,211,650 1,151,957 18,700 242,116 7,053 21,912 12,451,544 6,630 23,006,897 77,474,876 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 1,713,818 8,777,293 - - - - - - - 247,609 10,738,720 Communication & tech. 1,051,309 - - - - - - - - 154,100 1,205,409 Human resources 979,873 - - - - - - - - - 979,873 Finance 769,429 - - - - - - - - - 769,429 Public works 8,167,858 - - - - - - - - 3,424,712 11,592,570 Engineering 1,501,316 - 914,823 - - - - - - 5,279,103 7,695,242 Police 9,798,255 - - - 215,451 - - - - 592,875 10,606,581 Fire 6,663,937 - - - - - - - 301,350 6,965,287 Parks & recreation 1,283,592 - - - - 32,000 16,328 - 4,358 2,267,135 3,603,413 Community development 1,509,960 - - 18,700 - - - - - 14,826 1,543,486 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,020,022 - - 6,020,022 Transfers 2,254,968 - - - - - - - - 8,755,232 11,010,200 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 35,694,315 8,777,293 914,823 18,700 215,451 32,000 16,328 6,020,022 4,358 21,036,942 72,730,232 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services 23,901,342 114,688 1,079 - - - 61 - - 111,101 24,128,271 Contractual services 4,351,144 1,443,672 15,726 18,700 66,217 32,000 15,177 - - 377,752 6,320,388 Commodities 1,629,083 - 53 - 70,882 - 1,090 - - 29,569 1,730,677 Central services 3,557,778 - 79,752 - - - - - - - 3,637,530 Equipment - - - - 78,352 - - - - 1,389,968 1,468,320 Capital outlay - 7,218,933 818,213 - - - - - 4,358 10,373,320 18,414,824 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,020,022 - - 6,020,022 Transfers 2,254,968 - - - - - - - - 8,755,232 11,010,200 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 35,694,315 8,777,293 914,823 18,700 215,451 32,000 16,328 6,020,022 4,358 21,036,942 72,730,232 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (337,898)$ (3,565,643)$ 237,134$ -$ 26,665$ (24,947)$ 5,584$ 6,431,522$ 2,272$ 1,969,955$ 4,744,644$ 2014 GOVERNMENTAL FUND ACTUAL REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES 2014 Actual Financial Results by Fund DR A F T 55 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2014 ACTUAL FINANCIAL RESULTS BY FUND ENTERPRISE FUNDS The City uses two basic fund types to account for our financial activities, governmental fund types and enterprise fund types. In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services and enterprise funds are used to account for business-type activities. All of the City’s enterprise funds are shown here. Aquatic Golf Sports Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 17,548,883$ 13,515,168$ 918,412$ 3,229,348$ 2,091,685$ 17,874$ 480,882$ 1,325,608$ 758,893$ 39,886,753$ Intergovernmental 333,490 - - - - - - - - 333,490 Investment income 120,307 20,656 12,830 4,155 - - 2,103 22,065 9,858 191,974 Other revenue 1,919 (3,366) - 17,799 882 - 1,345 60,876 7,771 87,226 Transfers - - - 1,699,021 2,351,395 6,409,391 213,825 41,593 25,000 10,740,225 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 18,004,599 13,532,458 931,242 4,950,323 4,443,962 6,427,265 698,155 1,450,142 801,522 51,239,668 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration - 12,386,852 - - - - - - - 12,386,852 Finance 246,418 - - - - - - - - 246,418 Public works 13,384,256 - - - - - - - - 13,384,256 Engineering 101,387 - - - - - - - - 101,387 Police 475,136 - - - - - - - - 475,136 Parks and recreation - - 827,485 3,342,493 2,375,173 10,879 654,310 1,340,243 966,266 9,516,849 Transfers 100,000 1,035,000 - - - - - - - 1,135,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 14,307,197 13,421,852 827,485 3,342,493 2,375,173 10,879 654,310 1,340,243 966,266 37,245,898 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS - 9,936,468 31,873 299,949 93,323 - 2,881 65,464 10,241 10,440,199 Personal services 1,698,648 1,433,920 315,794 1,468,190 748,750 7,829 434,583 640,110 560,057 7,307,881 Contractual services 6,603,552 527,025 148,971 527,891 746,959 605 89,221 299,975 173,900 9,118,099 Commodities 820,879 180,576 56,649 378,257 103,107 2,445 68,112 116,404 134,148 1,860,577 Central services 678,743 220,594 25,857 123,729 55,061 - 33,540 49,558 48,112 1,235,194 Depreciation 3,642,118 88,269 241,671 502,528 489,471 - 25,973 168,732 39,808 5,198,570 Interest 763,257 - 6,670 41,949 138,502 - - - - 950,378 Transfers 100,000 1,035,000 - - - - - - - 1,135,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 14,307,197 13,421,852 827,485 3,342,493 2,375,173 10,879 654,310 1,340,243 966,266 37,245,898 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 3,697,402$ 110,606$ 103,757$ 1,607,830$ 2,068,789$ 6,416,386$ 43,845$ 109,899$ (164,744)$ 13,993,770$ 2014 ENTERPRISE FUND ACTUAL REVENUES AND EXPENSES DR A F T 56 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The City uses two basic fund types to account for our financial activities, governmental fund types and enterprise fund types. In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services and enterprise funds are used to account for business-type activities. All of the City’s governmental funds are shown here. Braemar Arts & Debt Environmental General HRA PACS CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Efficiency Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 22,933,958$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 5,128,980$ -$ 1,617,072$ 29,700,010$ Reductions (123,000) - - - - - - - - - (123,000) Net tax revenue 22,810,958 - - - - - 20,000 5,128,980 - 1,617,072 29,577,010 Tax increments - 100,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 Franchise fees & other taxes 770,000 - 1,200,000 - - - - - - 100,000 2,070,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - 2,083,699 - 1,909,298 3,992,997 Licenses and permits 3,830,080 - - - - - - - - 50,000 3,880,080 Intergovernmental 1,113,500 - - 100,000 115,325 - - - - 3,725,000 5,053,825 Charges for services 3,969,494 - - - - - - - - 50,000 4,019,494 Fines and forfeitures 950,000 - - - - - - - - - 950,000 Investment income 150,000 94,000 - - 300 200 - 20,000 - 62,900 327,400 Other revenue 461,100 - - - 57,821 7,000 23,000 - - 580,000 1,128,921 Transfers 765,100 - - - - - - - - 300,000 1,065,100 Debt issued - - - - - - - - - 4,599,895 4,599,895 Other financing sources - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 34,820,232 194,000 1,200,000 100,000 173,446 7,200 43,000 7,232,679 - 12,994,165 56,764,722 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 1,622,488 3,809,787 - - - - - - - 25,000 5,457,275 Communication & tech.1,040,674 - - - - - - - - 465,900 1,506,574 Human resources 692,387 - - - - - - - - - 692,387 Finance 904,918 - - - - - - - - - 904,918 Public works 8,459,610 - - - - - - - 327,036 776,872 9,563,518 Engineering 1,735,095 - 1,551,303 - - - - - - 10,463,193 13,749,591 Police 10,357,415 - - - 61,000 - - - - 905,000 11,323,415 Fire 7,007,398 - - - - - - - 41,000 86,549 7,134,947 Parks & recreation 1,388,087 - - - - 240,000 22,907 - 150,915 852,178 2,654,087 Community development 1,612,160 - - 100,000 - - - - - 30,000 1,742,160 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,654,894 - - 6,654,894 Transfers - - - - - - - - - 327,178 327,178 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 34,820,232 3,809,787 1,551,303 100,000 61,000 240,000 22,907 6,654,894 518,951 13,931,870 61,710,944 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services 24,798,774 118,467 - - - - - - - 106,559 25,023,800 Contractual services 4,469,594 6,120 23,000 100,000 56,000 - 21,057 - - 146,721 4,822,492 Commodities 1,773,292 200 28,000 - 5,000 - 1,850 - - 71,720 1,880,062 Central services 3,778,572 - 81,744 - - - - - - - 3,860,316 Equipment - - - - - 40,000 - - 180,606 1,526,372 1,746,978 Capital outlay - 3,685,000 1,418,559 - - 200,000 - - 338,345 11,753,320 17,395,224 Debt service - - - - - - - 6,654,894 - - 6,654,894 Transfers - - - - - - - - - 327,178 327,178 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 34,820,232 3,809,787 1,551,303 100,000 61,000 240,000 22,907 6,654,894 518,951 13,931,870 61,710,944 CHANGE IN 2015 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS 2015 Budget by Fund DR A F T 57 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUNDS The City uses two basic fund types to account for our financial activities, governmental fund types and enterprise fund types. In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services and enterprise funds are used to account for business-type activities. All of the City’s enterprise funds are shown here. 2015 BUDGET BY FUND Aquatic Golf Art Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Center Edinborough Centennial Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 19,433,473$ 14,367,118$ 1,023,000$ 3,916,400$ 2,017,519$ 445,950$ 1,354,800$ 786,000$ 43,344,260$ Intergovernmental 116,000 - - - - - - - 116,000 Investment income 96,556 - - - - - 15,000 25,000 136,556 Other revenue 56,527 - - - - 3,000 - - 59,527 Transfers - - - 1,540,000 360,000 285,000 264,700 32,000 2,481,700 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 19,702,556$ 14,367,118$ 1,023,000$ 5,456,400$ 2,377,519$ 733,950$ 1,634,500$ 843,000$ 46,138,043$ EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration -$ 12,506,524$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,506,524$ Finance 286,381 - - - - - - - 286,381 Public works 13,350,060 - - - - - - - 13,350,060 Engineering 177,000 - - - - - - - 177,000 Police 441,408 - - - - - - - 441,408 Parks and recreation - - 938,625 4,046,382 2,423,956 683,306 1,616,747 1,014,860 10,723,876 Transfers 100,000 1,850,100 - - - - - - 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 14,354,849$ 14,356,624$ 938,625$ 4,046,382$ 2,423,956$ 683,306$ 1,616,747$ 1,014,860$ 39,435,349$ EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS -$ 10,198,628$ 46,000$ 385,100$ 85,000$ 23,000$ 105,000$ 14,000$ 10,856,728$ Personal services 1,732,897 1,419,298 371,593 1,879,494 885,513 449,431 745,581 623,683 8,107,490 Contractual services 6,723,540 522,928 162,300 642,300 612,750 101,175 362,650 177,625 9,305,268 Commodities 999,500 63,150 89,650 436,900 96,950 48,300 183,450 108,300 2,026,200 Central services 708,588 227,520 27,108 132,588 58,836 35,400 53,316 51,252 1,294,608 Depreciation 3,487,500 75,000 236,500 570,000 545,000 26,000 166,750 40,000 5,146,750 Interest 602,824 - 5,474 - 139,907 - - - 748,205 Transfers 100,000 1,850,100 - - - - - - 1,950,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 14,354,849$ 14,356,624$ 938,625$ 4,046,382$ 2,423,956$ 683,306$ 1,616,747$ 1,014,860$ 39,435,349$ CHANGE IN NET POSITION 5,347,707$ 10,494$ 84,375$ 1,410,018$ (46,437)$ 50,644$ 17,753$ (171,860)$ 6,702,694$ 2015 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS DR A F T 58 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The City uses two basic fund types to account for our financial activities, governmental fund types and enterprise fund types. In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services and enterprise funds are used to account for business-type activities. All of the City’s governmental funds are shown here. Braemar Arts & Debt Environmental General HRA PACS CAS CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Efficiency Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 25,023,952$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 5,075,171$ -$ 1,680,000$ 31,799,123$ Reductions - - - - - - - - - - - - Net tax revenue 25,023,952 - - - - - - 20,000 5,075,171 - 1,680,000 31,799,123 Tax increments - 2,500,000 - - - - - - - - - 2,500,000 Franchise fees & other taxes 810,000 - 1,200,000 200,000 - - - - - - 105,000 2,315,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - - - - 4,127,890 4,127,890 Licenses and permits 4,023,160 - - - - - - - - - 90,000 4,113,160 Intergovernmental 1,191,550 - - - 125,000 36,000 - - - - 3,090,000 4,442,550 Charges for services 3,940,310 50,000 - - - - - - - - 35,000 4,025,310 Fines and forfeitures 975,000 - - - - - - - - - - 975,000 Investment income 120,000 77,000 - - - 300 200 - 10,000 - 70,000 277,500 Other revenue 477,900 - - - - 134,061 5,000 4,850 - - 100,000 721,811 Transfers 100,000 - - - - - - - 2,630,628 - 200,000 2,930,628 Debt issued - - - - - - - - - - 3,852,396 3,852,396 Other financing sources - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 36,661,872 2,627,000 1,200,000 200,000 125,000 170,361 5,200 24,850 7,715,799 - 13,350,286 62,080,368 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 1,896,810 4,780,835 - - - - - - - - 25,000 6,702,645 Communication & tech. 1,104,618 - - - - - - - - - 749,129 1,853,747 Human resources 790,345 - - - - - - - - - - 790,345 Finance 833,624 - - - - - - - - - 50,000 883,624 Public works 8,926,600 - - - - - - - - 104,000 1,251,836 10,282,436 Engineering 1,585,209 - 1,252,566 153,126 - - - - - - 8,251,528 11,242,429 Police 11,045,546 - - - - 174,000 - - - - 732,650 11,952,196 Fire 7,457,253 - - - - - - - - - 695,000 8,152,253 Parks & recreation 1,374,922 - - - - - - 22,425 - - 323,100 1,720,447 Community development 1,646,945 - - - 125,000 - - - - - - 1,771,945 Debt service - - - - - - - - 7,552,545 - - 7,552,545 Transfers - - - - - - - - - - 2,630,628 2,630,628 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 36,661,872 4,780,835 1,252,566 153,126 125,000 174,000 - 22,425 7,552,545 104,000 14,708,871 65,535,240 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services 25,797,378 123,970 112,566 103,126 - - - - - - 102,803 26,239,843 Contractual services 4,858,026 655,865 20,000 35,000 125,000 104,000 - 20,400 - - 214,760 6,033,051 Commodities 2,082,840 1,000 20,000 15,000 - 15,000 - 2,025 - - 26,149 2,162,014 Central services 3,923,628 - - - - - - - - - 1,968 3,925,596 Equipment - - - - - 55,000 - - - - 2,058,177 2,113,177 Capital outlay - 4,000,000 1,100,000 - - - - - - 104,000 9,674,386 14,878,386 Debt service - - - - - - - - 7,552,545 - - 7,552,545 Transfers - - - - - - - - - - 2,630,628 2,630,628 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 36,661,872 4,780,835 1,252,566 153,126 125,000 174,000 - 22,425 7,552,545 104,000 14,708,871 65,535,240 CHANGE IN 2016 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS 2016 Budget by Fund DR A F T 59 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2016 BUDGET BY FUND ENTERPRISE FUNDS The City uses two basic fund types to account for our financial activities, governmental fund types and enterprise fund types. In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services and enterprise funds are used to account for business-type activities. All of the City’s enterprise funds are shown here. Aquatic Golf Sports Art Risk Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Management Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 19,704,773$ 12,414,257$ 975,477$ 2,955,168$ 2,230,250$ 396,310$ 453,350$ 1,350,800$ 779,000$ 731,508$ 41,990,893$ Intergovernmental 297,000 - - - - - - - - - 297,000 Investment income 74,237 - 7,000 8,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 14,000 3,000 - 113,237 Other revenue 10,000 10,000 - - - - 1,500 - - - 21,500 Transfers - - - 150,000 200,000 - 100,000 - 50,000 - 500,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 20,086,010 12,424,257 982,477 3,113,168 2,432,250 399,310 556,850 1,364,800 832,000 731,508 42,922,630 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration - 11,762,118 - - - - - - - - 11,762,118 Human resources - - - - - - - - - 665,000 665,000 Finance 298,393 - - - - - - - - - 298,393 Public works 14,783,880 - - - - - - - - - 14,783,880 Engineering 239,096 - - - - - - - - - 239,096 Police 496,970 - - - - - - - - - 496,970 Parks and recreation - - 918,406 3,202,114 2,610,691 721,441 684,447 1,622,702 1,069,487 - 10,829,288 Transfers 100,000 700,000 - - - - - - - - 800,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 15,918,339 12,462,118 918,406 3,202,114 2,610,691 721,441 684,447 1,622,702 1,069,487 665,000 39,874,745 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS - 9,326,730 42,000 185,599 105,500 - 2,750 85,000 14,000 - 9,761,579 Personal services 2,055,038 1,492,365 331,305 1,356,923 871,133 58,272 439,729 774,962 635,066 60,000 8,074,793 Contractual services 7,312,068 517,906 179,200 490,794 729,950 148,180 106,350 352,250 183,925 605,000 10,625,623 Commodities 1,065,750 74,009 89,150 313,990 104,250 3,277 71,250 169,800 135,800 - 2,027,276 Central services 682,320 256,608 33,228 130,404 68,676 11,712 40,368 68,940 60,696 - 1,352,952 Depreciation 4,227,000 94,500 241,500 640,000 600,000 500,000 24,000 171,750 40,000 - 6,538,750 Interest 476,163 - 2,023 84,404 131,182 - - - - - 693,772 Transfers 100,000 700,000 - - - - - - - - 800,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 15,918,339 12,462,118 918,406 3,202,114 2,610,691 721,441 684,447 1,622,702 1,069,487 665,000 39,874,745 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 4,167,671$ (37,861)$ 64,071$ (88,946)$ (178,441)$ (322,131)$ (127,597)$ (257,902)$ (237,487)$ 66,508$ 3,047,885$ 2016 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS DR A F T 60 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS The City uses two basic fund types to account for our financial activities, governmental fund types and enterprise fund types. In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services and enterprise funds are used to account for business-type activities. All of the City’s governmental funds are shown here. Braemar Arts & Debt Environmental General HRA PACS CAS CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Efficiency Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 26,360,319$ 95,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 4,635,500$ -$ 1,750,000$ 32,860,819$ Reductions - - - - - - - - - - - - Net tax revenue 26,360,319 95,000 - - - - - 20,000 4,635,500 - 1,750,000 32,860,819 Tax increments - 2,500,000 - - - - - - - - - 2,500,000 Franchise fees & other taxes 810,000 - 1,200,000 250,000 - - - - - - 105,000 2,365,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - - - - 3,878,724 3,878,724 Licenses and permits 4,192,660 - - - - - - - - - 90,000 4,282,660 Intergovernmental 1,195,550 - - - 125,000 36,000 - - - - - 1,356,550 Charges for services 4,017,973 7,275,000 - - - - - - - - 35,000 11,327,973 Fines and forfeitures 975,000 - - - - - - - - - - 975,000 Investment income 120,000 62,000 - - - 300 200 - 10,000 - 70,000 262,500 Other revenue 478,800 - - - - 134,061 5,000 5,350 - - 100,000 723,211 Transfers 50,000 - - - - - - - 2,733,625 - 200,000 2,983,625 Debt issued - - - - - - - - - - 3,193,204 3,193,204 Other financing sources - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 38,200,302 9,932,000 1,200,000 250,000 125,000 170,361 5,200 25,350 7,379,125 - 9,421,928 66,709,266 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 1,839,504 12,985,433 - - - - - - - - 38,750 14,863,687 Communication & tech. 1,204,517 - - - - - - - - - 539,700 1,744,217 Human resources 812,755 - - - - - - - - - - 812,755 Finance 880,745 - - - - - - - - - - 880,745 Public works 9,227,954 - - - - - - - - - 1,237,935 10,465,889 Engineering 1,642,170 - 1,167,265 157,495 - - - - - - 4,285,605 7,252,535 Police 11,438,368 - - - - 113,000 - - - - 272,410 11,823,778 Fire 7,746,806 - - - - - - - - - 187,000 7,933,806 Parks & recreation 1,597,506 - - - - - - 22,450 - 71,295 205,000 1,896,251 Community development 1,809,977 - - - 125,000 - - - - - 200,000 2,134,977 Debt service - - - - - - - - 7,620,640 - - 7,620,640 Transfers - - - - - - - - - - 2,733,625 2,733,625 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 38,200,302 12,985,433 1,167,265 157,495 125,000 113,000 - 22,450 7,620,640 71,295 9,700,025 70,162,905 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services 26,745,744 129,068 117,265 107,495 - - - - - - 107,237 27,206,809 Contractual services 5,296,577 679,865 20,000 35,000 125,000 98,000 - 20,425 - - 221,203 6,496,070 Commodities 2,128,165 1,500 20,000 15,000 - 15,000 - 2,025 - - 26,933 2,208,623 Central services 4,029,816 - - - - - - - - - 1,968 4,031,784 Equipment - - - - - - - - - - 1,024,054 1,024,054 Capital outlay - 12,175,000 1,010,000 - - - - - - 71,295 5,585,005 18,841,300 Debt service - - - - - - - - 7,620,640 - - 7,620,640 Transfers - - - - - - - - - - 2,733,625 2,733,625 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 38,200,302 12,985,433 1,167,265 157,495 125,000 113,000 - 22,450 7,620,640 71,295 9,700,025 70,162,905 CHANGE IN 2017 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS 2017 Budget by Fund DR A F T 61 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2017 BUDGET BY FUND ENTERPRISE FUNDS The City uses two basic fund types to account for our financial activities, governmental fund types and enterprise fund types. In general, governmental funds are used to account for traditional government services and enterprise funds are used to account for business-type activities. All of the City’s enterprise funds are shown here. Aquatic Golf Sports Art Risk Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Management Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 20,680,555$ 12,667,946$ 1,014,186$ 1,273,301$ 2,250,500$ 401,810$ 453,350$ 1,362,800$ 784,000$ 731,508$ 41,619,956$ Intergovernmental 112,000 - - - - - - - - - 112,000 Investment income 79,889 - 3,000 9,000 4,000 5,000 1,000 13,000 3,000 - 117,889 Other revenue 10,000 10,000 - - - - 1,500 - - - 21,500 Transfers - - - 200,000 200,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 600,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 20,882,444 12,677,946 1,017,186 1,482,301 2,454,500 406,810 555,850 1,375,800 887,000 731,508 42,471,345 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration - 12,025,686 - - - - - - - - 12,025,686 Human resources - - - - - - - - - 665,000 665,000 Finance 309,404 - - - - - - - - - 309,404 Public works 15,375,873 - - - - - - - - - 15,375,873 Engineering 243,254 - - - - - - - - - 243,254 Police 507,724 - - - - - - - - - 507,724 Parks and recreation - - 938,173 2,023,015 2,654,073 736,043 709,507 1,671,496 1,095,584 - 9,827,891 Transfers 100,000 750,000 - - - - - - - - 850,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 16,536,255 12,775,686 938,173 2,023,015 2,654,073 736,043 709,507 1,671,496 1,095,584 665,000 39,804,832 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS - 9,517,071 42,000 37,120 105,500 - 2,750 85,000 14,000 - 9,803,441 Personal services 2,141,629 1,551,432 343,354 584,204 905,311 60,424 456,631 807,256 661,099 60,000 7,571,340 Contractual services 7,605,022 526,879 179,200 367,175 729,950 149,930 107,950 351,750 183,925 605,000 10,806,781 Commodities 1,116,700 75,032 89,150 104,085 104,750 3,725 73,800 169,800 123,800 - 1,860,842 Central services 696,132 260,772 37,956 139,392 71,628 11,964 44,376 80,940 70,260 - 1,413,420 Depreciation 4,499,500 94,500 246,500 710,000 610,000 510,000 24,000 176,750 42,500 - 6,913,750 Interest 377,272 - 13 81,039 126,934 - - - - - 585,258 Transfers 100,000 750,000 - - - - - - - - 850,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 16,536,255 12,775,686 938,173 2,023,015 2,654,073 736,043 709,507 1,671,496 1,095,584 665,000 39,804,832 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 4,346,189$ (97,740)$ 79,013$ (540,714)$ (199,573)$ (329,233)$ (153,657)$ (295,696)$ (208,584)$ 66,508$ 2,666,513$ 2017 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS DR A F T 62 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSFERS Interfund transfers allow the City to reallocate assets to the funds where those assets can be used to achieve desired outcomes. For example, for many years in Edina, the three municipal liquor stores generated excess income that has been reinvested in other purposes. This tradition is expected to continue through 2016, as shown on the next two pages. Budgeted transfers in 2016 include: 1. $2,630,628 in total transfers out of the Construction Fund to the Debt Service Fund to provide financing for principal and interest payments for special assessment bonds. In previous years, special assessment revenue was primarily recorded in the Debt Service Fund and special assessment funded project expenses were recorded in the Construction Fund. Beginning in 2015, and going forward, both special assessment revenue and special assessment funded project expenses are being recorded in the Construction Fund, and a transfer is made into the Debt Service Fund to pay Special Assessment bond payments when due. This change in accounting procedure allows the City more investment flexibility throughout the year. 2. $700,000 in total transfers from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund, Construction Fund, and to various park enterprise funds, to help finance the basic operating purposes of these funds. 3. $100,000 transfer from the Utilities Fund to the Construction Fund. Construction Utilities Liquor Total 2016 Transfer in: General Fund -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ Construction - 100,000 100,000 200,000 Debt Service 2,630,628 - - 2,630,628 Golf Course - - 150,000 150,000 Arena - - 200,000 200,000 Art Center - - 100,000 100,000 Centennial Lakes - - 50,000 50,000 Total 2,630,628$ 100,000$ 700,000$ 3,430,628$ 2016 Transfer Out: Transfers DR A F T 63 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSFERS Budgeted transfers in 2017 include: 1. $2,733,625 in total transfers out of the Construction Fund to the Debt Service Fund to provide financing for principal and interest payments for special assessment bonds. In previous years, special assessment revenue was primarily recorded in the Debt Service Fund and special assessment funded project expenses were recorded in the Construction Fund. Beginning in 2015, and going forward, both special assessment revenue and special assessment funded project expenses are being recorded in the Construction Fund, and a transfer is made into the Debt Service Fund to pay Special Assessment bond payments when due. This change in accounting procedure allows the City more investment flexibility throughout the year. 2. $750,000 in total transfers from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund, Construction Fund, and to various park enterprise funds, to help finance the basic operating purposes of these funds. 3. $100,000 transfer from the Utilities Fund to the Construction Fund. In addition to budgeted transfers, the City Council will periodically authorize interfund transfers mid-year. The most common example of this is when our General Fund has unassigned fund balance at year-end according to our fund balance policy. Typically we know this amount when the annual audit is finished around June, and the process to reach a decision on where to allocate this money starts then. The fund balance policy also states that, to the extent possible, such excess funds should be transferred to the Construction Fund to support capital improvements and equipment. As of December 31, 2014, the City had $708,294 in excess funds in our General Fund according to our fund balance policy. During 2015, the City Council decided to allocate this cash to the Construction Fund for 2015-2016 projects. Construction Utilities Liquor Total 2017 Transfer in: General Fund -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ Construction - 100,000 100,000 200,000 Debt Service 2,733,625 - - 2,733,625 Golf Course - - 200,000 200,000 Arena - - 200,000 200,000 Art Center - - 100,000 100,000 Centennial Lakes - - 100,000 100,000 Total 2,733,625$ 100,000$ 750,000$ 3,583,625$ 2017 Transfer Out: DR A F T 64 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Fund balance refers to the difference between assets and liabilities for governmental funds. Since all related assets and liabilities are not reported for governmental funds, fund balance is considered more of a liquidity measure than a net worth measure. Credit rating agencies monitor fund balance levels and consider fund balance when determining the City’s creditworthiness. GASB 54 defines five different classifications that the City may use to disclose constraints for how these amounts can be spent. These classifications are as follows: Nonspendable – Amounts that cannot be spent, such as prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets. Restricted – Amounts subject to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, contributors, or law. Committed – Constrained by formal internal action, such as City Council resolution. Assigned – Internally imposed constraints that do not meet the definition of Restricted or Committed. Unassigned – Available to spend. The schedules on the next two pages show fund balance and net position trends for all of the City’s funds. The first year of balances and activity shown represent actual amounts from the most recently completed annual audit. The second year of balances and activity shown are projections compiled by City staff for the uncompleted balance of the current fiscal year (the year this budget was written). The third and fourth years of balances and activity shown are continued projections based on the annual revenue and expenditure/expense budgets contained in this document. Projected Changes in Fund Balance — All Funds DR A F T 65 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROJECTED CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE—ALL FUNDS FUND BALANCE—GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Year Fund Balance January 1 Revenues and other financing sources Expenditures and other financing uses Fund Balance December 31 $ Increase/ (Decrease) % Increase/ (Decrease) Reason for Increase/(Decrease) > 10% General Fund 2014 14,331,635$ 35,356,417$ 35,694,315$ 13,993,737$ (337,898)$ -2.4% 2015 13,993,737 34,223,048 36,128,992 12,087,793 (1,905,944) -13.6% No estimated transfer from Liquor Fund 2016 12,087,793 36,661,872 36,661,872 12,087,793 - 0.0% 2017 12,087,793 38,200,302 38,200,302 12,087,793 - 0.0% Housing and 2014 11,495,641 5,211,650 8,777,293 7,929,998 (3,565,643) -31.0% Capital improvements Redevelopment 2015 7,929,998 1,884,000 3,999,787 5,814,211 (2,115,787) -26.7% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP Authority (HRA) 2016 5,814,211 2,627,000 4,780,835 3,660,376 (2,153,835) -37.0% Pentagon park developer reimbursement 2017 3,660,376 9,932,000 12,985,433 606,943 (3,053,433) -83.4% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP Pedestrian and Cyclist 2014 492,362 1,151,957 914,823 729,496 237,134 48.2% Some capital improvements deferred Safety (PACS)2015 729,496 1,200,000 1,540,303 389,193 (340,303) -46.6% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP 2016 389,193 1,200,000 1,252,566 336,627 (52,566) -13.5% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP 2017 336,627 1,200,000 1,167,265 369,362 32,735 9.7% Conservation and 2014 - - - - - 0.0% Fund established in 2016 Sustainability (CAS) 2015 - - - - - 0.0% 2016 - 200,000 153,126 46,874 46,874 0.0% 2017 46,874 250,000 157,495 139,379 92,505 197.3% Building fund balance for cash flow purposes Community 2014 - 18,700 18,700 - - 0.0% Development 2015 - 125,000 125,000 - - 0.0% Block Grant (CDBG) 2016 - 125,000 125,000 - - 0.0% 2017 - 125,000 125,000 - - 0.0% Police Special 2014 717,343 242,116 215,451 744,008 26,665 3.7% Revenue 2015 744,008 116,121 328,000 532,129 (211,879) -28.5% Improvement to 911 phone system 2016 532,129 170,361 174,000 528,490 (3,639) -0.7% 2017 528,490 170,361 113,000 585,851 57,361 10.9% External restrictions on spending Braemar Memorial 2014 335,170 7,053 32,000 310,223 (24,947) -7.4% 2015 310,223 7,200 240,000 77,423 (232,800) -75.0% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP 2016 77,423 5,200 - 82,623 5,200 6.7% 2017 82,623 5,200 - 87,823 5,200 6.3% Arts & Culture 2014 - 21,912 16,328 5,584 5,584 0.0% Fund established in 2014 2015 5,584 24,850 22,425 8,009 2,425 43.4% Building fund balance for cash flow purposes 2016 8,009 24,850 22,425 10,434 2,425 30.3% Building fund balance for cash flow purposes 2017 10,434 25,350 22,450 13,334 2,900 27.8% Building fund balance for cash flow purposes Debt Service 2014 6,246,769 12,451,544 6,020,022 12,678,291 6,431,522 103.0% Refunding bonds sold in 2014 for 2015 call 2015 12,678,291 10,869,566 15,502,982 8,044,875 (4,633,416) -36.5% Refunding bonds sold in 2014 for 2015 call 2016 8,044,875 7,715,799 7,552,545 8,208,129 163,254 2.0% 2017 8,208,129 7,379,125 7,620,640 7,966,614 (241,515) -2.9% Environmental 2014 816,654 6,630 4,358 818,926 2,272 0.3% Efficiency 2015 818,926 - 518,951 299,975 (518,951) -63.4% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP 2016 299,975 - 104,000 195,975 (104,000) -34.7% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP 2017 195,975 - 71,295 124,680 (71,295) -36.4% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP Construction 2014 10,856,561 23,111,625 21,141,670 12,826,516 1,969,955 18.1% Bonds sold for ongoing capital projects 2015 12,826,516 12,885,973 14,443,900 11,268,589 (1,557,927) -12.1% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP 2016 11,268,589 13,350,286 14,708,871 9,910,004 (1,358,585) -12.1% Projects detailed in 2015-2019 CIP 2017 9,910,004 9,421,928 9,700,025 9,631,907 (278,097) -2.8% Fund DR A F T 66 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROJECTED CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE—ALL FUNDS NET POSITION—ENTERPRISE FUNDS Net position refers to the difference between assets and liabilities for enterprise funds. Since enterprise funds report more assets and liabilities than governmental funds, net position is a more accurate measure of net worth. Credit rating agencies also consider fund net position when determining the City’s creditworthiness. Net position is displayed in three classifications: Net investment in capital assets – Capital assets less accumulated depreciation and debt, which cannot be spent because the asset is not liquid. Restricted – Amounts subject to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, contributors, or law. Unrestricted – Available to spend or allocate. DR A F T 67 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PROJECTED CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE—ALL FUNDS NET POSITION—ENTERPRISE FUNDS Year Net Position January 1 Revenues and other financing sources Expenses and other financing uses Net Position December 31 $ Increase/ (Decrease) % Increase/ (Decrease) Reason for Increase/(Decrease) > 10% Utilities 2014 65,879,790$ 18,138,014$ 14,440,612$ 69,577,192$ 3,697,402$ 5.6% 2015 69,577,192 19,250,119 15,128,089 73,699,222 4,122,030 5.9% 2016 73,699,222 20,086,010 15,918,339 77,866,893 4,167,671 5.7% 2017 77,866,893 20,882,444 16,536,255 82,213,082 4,346,189 5.6% Liquor 2014 3,078,285 13,538,824 13,428,218 3,188,891 110,606 3.6% 2015 3,188,891 12,301,202 12,239,609 3,250,484 61,593 1.9% 2016 3,250,484 12,424,257 12,462,118 3,212,623 (37,861) -1.2% 2017 3,212,623 12,677,946 12,775,686 3,114,883 (97,740) -3.0% Aquatic Center 2014 2,814,917 931,782 828,025 2,918,674 103,757 3.7% 2015 2,918,674 973,500 944,425 2,947,749 29,075 1.0% 2016 2,947,749 982,477 918,406 3,011,820 64,071 2.2% 2017 3,011,820 1,017,186 938,173 3,090,833 79,013 2.6% Golf Course 2014 4,992,844 4,951,257 3,343,427 6,600,674 1,607,830 32.2% Transfers from other funds 2015 6,600,674 3,132,477 2,895,230 6,837,921 237,247 3.6% 2016 6,837,921 3,113,168 3,202,114 6,748,975 (88,946) -1.3% 2017 6,748,975 1,482,301 2,023,015 6,208,261 (540,714) -8.0% Course renovation. Arena 2014 2,574,340 4,443,962 2,375,173 4,643,129 2,068,789 80.4% Transfers from other funds 2015 4,643,129 2,398,700 2,631,024 4,410,805 (232,324) -5.0% 2016 4,410,805 2,432,250 2,610,691 4,232,364 (178,441) -4.0% 2017 4,232,364 2,454,500 2,654,073 4,032,791 (199,573) -4.7% Sports Dome 2014 - 6,427,265 10,879 6,416,386 6,416,386 0.0% 2015 6,416,386 392,310 555,230 6,253,466 (162,920) -2.5% 2016 6,253,466 399,310 721,441 5,931,335 (322,131) -5.2% 2017 5,931,335 406,810 736,043 5,602,102 (329,233) -5.6% Art Center 2014 360,587 702,239 658,394 404,432 43,845 12.2% Transfers from other funds 2015 404,432 711,182 640,838 474,776 70,344 17.4% Transfers from other funds 2016 474,776 556,850 684,447 347,179 (127,597) -26.9% Increased expenses due to inflation 2017 347,179 555,850 709,507 193,522 (153,657) -44.3% Increased expenses due to inflation Edinborough Park 2014 2,659,900 1,450,142 1,340,243 2,769,799 109,899 4.1% 2015 2,769,799 1,607,400 1,593,347 2,783,852 14,053 0.5% 2016 2,783,852 1,364,800 1,622,702 2,525,950 (257,902) -9.3% 2017 2,525,950 1,375,800 1,671,496 2,230,254 (295,696) -11.7% Planned use of unrestricted investments Centennial Lakes 2014 1,244,560 801,522 966,266 1,079,816 (164,744) -13.2% Planned use of unrestricted investments 2015 1,079,816 850,500 1,017,284 913,032 (166,784) -15.4% Planned use of unrestricted investments 2016 913,032 832,000 1,069,487 675,545 (237,487) -26.0% Planned use of unrestricted investments 2017 675,545 887,000 1,095,584 466,961 (208,584) -30.9% Planned use of unrestricted investments Risk Management 2014 - - - - - 0.0% Fund established in 2016 2015 - - - - - 0.0% 2016 - 731,508 665,000 66,508 66,508 0.0% 2017 66,508 731,508 665,000 133,016 66,508 100.0% Building fund balance for budget overages Fund DR A F T DR A F T For living, learning, raising families, and doing business. City of Edina DEPARTMENTS DR A F T 70 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager lschaefer@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0416 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Administration Department provides an internal focus for the organization and coordinates and oversees the supporting departments of the City. The Administration Department supports the City Manager and leads projects with city-wide impacts including strategic planning, performance management and measurement, oversight of boards and commissions, leadership development, and neighborhood support. The Department is also responsible for growing a values-based organizational culture in alignment with the Edina IQS (Integrity, Quality and Service). The Administration Department contains three divisions: Economic Development (HRA), Elections and Record Management and Liquor Store Operations. The Department serves as the liaison to the Human Rights & Relations Commission, Edina Historical Society, Edina Community Foundation and other non-profit service agencies. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Strategic Planning Performance Management and Measurement Boards and Commissions Organization and Leadership Development Liquor Store Operations Legal Services Neighborhood Engagement Economic Development Records Management Licensing Elections Volunteer Program DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART The Edina City Council adopted the Vision Edina Strategic Vision and Framework document in 2015. DR A F T 71 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT 2016-2017 DEPARTMENT GOALS Increase the efficiency of internal operations for the City. Use technology to streamline workflow across City Departments. Establish formal volunteer program. Develop and coordinate new leadership training program. 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Updated the City’s long-term strategic plan, Vision Edina, through extensive community engagement meetings and surveys. The document will now serve as the foundation for other strategic efforts including the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Improvement Plans and budget documents. Worked with the Customer Service Team to develop and deliver IQS introduction workshop to all City staff. Coordinated the first employee engagement survey and follow up action plans. Developed a small area planning guidebook and used the guidebook to complete the Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan. Officially recognized City neighborhoods and hosted first neighborhood workshop for existing associations. Rewrote the City’s liquor ordinance to reflect the changing industry and current resident preferences. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Percentage of residents rating the quality of life in Edina as “excellent” or “good”. 99% N/A 96% Percentage of residents who feel that they could have a say about how things are run in the community - if they desire 84% N/A 68% Percentage of residents who, from their experience, rate the courtesy and friendliness of staff as “excellent” or “good”. 91% N/A 92% Number of recognized neighborhoods 3 7 9 DR A F T 72 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted General Fund Administration 1,456,077$ 1,307,748$ 1,294,595$ 1,294,595$ 1,456,454$ 1,494,550$ City Clerk 165,306 406,070 327,893 327,893 440,356 344,954 General fund subtotal 1,621,383 1,713,818 1,622,488 1,622,488 1,896,810 1,839,504 Other Funds Risk Management 834,129 628,268 555,000 609,000 - - Economic Development (HRA) 3,900,927 8,777,293 619,287 3,809,787 4,780,835 12,985,433 Construction 367,399 247,609 25,000 25,000 25,000 38,750 Liquor fund 12,264,413 12,386,852 11,354,609 12,506,524 11,762,118 12,025,686 Department Total Budget 18,988,251$ 23,753,840$ 14,176,384$ 18,572,799$ 18,464,763$ 26,889,373$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Administration Department Expenditures & Expenses Administration 7% City Clerk 2%Risk Management 2% Economic Development (HRA) 29% Construction 0% Liquor fund 60% Expenditures and Expenses by Service Area DR A F T 73 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT Administration 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted General Fund Personal services 639,837$ 579,309$ 565,832$ 565,832$ 623,521$ 648,383$ Contractual services 335,667 273,135 253,475 253,475 317,729 330,835 Commodities 11,845 12,080 5,000 5,000 33,100 32,100 Central services 101,583 83,680 90,288 90,288 82,104 83,232 Total 1,088,932$ 948,204$ 914,595$ 914,595$ 1,056,454$ 1,094,550$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Administration Expenditures Personal services 60% Contractual services 29% Commodities 2%Central services 9% Administration Expenditures by Type DR A F T 74 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT City Clerk DIVISION OVERVIEW The City Clerk Division is responsible for duties outlined in Minnesota State Statute 412.151 including: administration of elections, maintenance of official records and the City Code, records management and data practices. The City Clerk serves as the Data Practices Compliance Officer and Responsible Authority. The Division conducts all national, state, county and City elections held in even-numbered years. Additionally, the City conducts all Edina School District 273 elections held in odd-numbered years. Costs for conducting school elections are billed to the Edina School District. Edina has 20 voting precincts with approximately 32,000 registered voters. The Division recruits and trains approximately 300 election judges each election cycle. Absentee ballots are also issued and processed through the City Clerk division. Typically, about 20% of citizens voting in Edina do so via absentee ballot. The Division coordinates the issuance of business licenses within the City of Edina, including amusement devices, body art, food establishments, liquor sales, massage, multi-family housing garages, pools, parking ramps, refuse haulers, tobacco and vending sales. Permits are also issued for the following activities: block parties, charitable gambling registration, fireworks sales, loudspeakers and special events. In addition, the Division processes registrations for domestic partnerships and the keeping of honeybees. 24,049 residents voted during the elections held in 2014. DR A F T 75 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—CITY CLERK 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Evaluate online election judge training. Update and implement records training for City employees. Expand the electronic records archives. Select and implement business licensing software in conjunction with the Edina Health Division. Administer 2016 general election in an effective and efficient manner. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Assisted 24,049 citizens cast their ballots during the 2014 General Election — 69.8% of registered voters participated in the election. Processed 5,057 absentee ballots, which was 25% more absentee ballots than the previous General Election in 2010. Added 530,000 pages to the electronic records archive and eliminated 125 boxes of paper records. Implemented Agenda Management Software for City Council and Boards and Commissions to increase efficiency for staff and reduce the use of paper. Completed the recodification of Edina City Code and process two supplements with online versions that is updated as each new ordinance is adopted. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Number of people voting in elections 3,480 24,049 6,656* Percentage of Registered Voters voting in elections 12.9% 69.8% 24.5% Number of business licenses issued 647 522 512 Number of permits issued 232 91 98 Number of absentee ballots issued 109 5,057 688 *Numbers based off of special election held in May 2015 DR A F T 76 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—CITY CLERK 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted General Fund Personal services 124,390$ 308,305$ 240,082$ 240,082$ 335,384$ 248,250$ Contractual services 17,317 69,177 59,875 59,875 75,700 71,300 Commodities 10,094 13,121 12,000 12,000 13,000 9,000 Central services 13,505 15,467 15,936 15,936 16,272 16,404 Total 165,306$ 406,070$ 327,893$ 327,893$ 440,356$ 344,954$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. City Clerk Expenditures Personal services 74% Contractual services 19% Commodities 3% Central services 4% City Clerk Budgeted Expenditures by Type DR A F T 77 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT Liquor Operations DIVISION OVERVIEW The City operates three municipal stores. The 50th & France store is located at 3943 W. 50th St. The Grandview store is located at 5013 Vernon Ave. The Southdale store is located at 6755 York Ave S. Stores are strategically located near supermarkets. The City of Edina is in the municipal liquor business for two reasons: to control the sale of alcohol in our community and to generate revenue for the City of Edina. In the past, the three Edina Liquor locations combined have generated over $1 million a year in operating income. Due to increased competition in the marketplace, the City has budgeted less income for 2016 and 2017. This money will be used to subsidize many of the City’s public amenities by transferring cash to other City funds, including the Arena, Golf Course, Art Center and Construction Funds. The General Fund also receives cash from the Liquor Fund. Edina Liquor continues to be one of the top-performing municipal operations in Minnesota. Edina Liquor consistently ranks in the top three Minnesota municipal operations in sales and net profit. The Southdale store is the largest grossing store for a municipal operation in Minnesota. Edina Liquor leads all municipal liquor operations in gross wine sales, and is one of the top sellers of Scotch Whisky and Irish Whiskey. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 78 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—LIQUOR OPERATIONS 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Continue to pursue new marketing/advertising opportunities to help increase brand awareness in our ever changing industry. Continue to implement product training for staff that was developed in the fall of 2015. Increase membership in the customer loyalty program by using new point of sale software installed in the fall of 2015. Continue to enhance pricing strategy based on current trends in the industry. Take active role in working with the Minnesota Municipal Beverage Association and other liquor organizations to advocate for beneficial legislation. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Finished developing product training manual used to train staff and improve product knowledge. Created new community-based branding efforts that received two national awards. Installed new point of sale system in the fall of 2015 to help better analyze sales and costs. Completed improvement projects at all stores including the installation of new wayfinding signage, LED signage, awnings as well as remodeling projects at the Grandview and 50th and France stores. * 50th and France store was closed for seven weeks for remodeling ** Through September 2015 PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015** Operating revenue as a % of operating expenses 112% 109% 104% Number of customers 510,138 502,540* 348,544 Gross sales $13,600,099 $13,515,168 $8,840357 Cash transferred out to support other City funds $1,340,100 $1,035,000 TBD DR A F T 79 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—LIQUOR OPERATIONS 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating revenues Retail sales 13,711,557$ 13,515,168$ 12,290,202$ 14,367,118$ 12,414,257$ 12,667,946$ Total revenues 13,711,557 13,515,168 12,290,202 14,367,118 12,414,257 12,667,946 Operating expenses Cost of sales and services 9,964,763 9,936,468 9,143,626 10,198,628 9,326,730 9,517,071 Personal services 1,384,831 1,433,920 1,324,517 1,419,298 1,492,365 1,551,432 Contractual services 538,765 527,025 509,453 522,928 517,906 526,879 Commodities 73,598 180,576 73,485 63,150 74,009 75,032 Central services 223,334 220,594 227,528 227,520 256,608 260,772 Depreciation 79,122 88,269 76,000 75,000 94,500 94,500 Total expenses 12,264,413 12,386,852 11,354,609 12,506,524 11,762,118 12,025,686 Operating income 1,447,144 1,128,316 935,593 1,860,594 652,139 642,260 *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Liquor Fund Revenues and Expenses Cost of sales and services 80% Personal services 12% Contractual services 4% Commodities 1%Central services 2%Depreciation 1% Liquor Fund Expenses by Type DR A F T 80 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT Economic Development / Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) DIVISION OVERVIEW The City strives to maintain a strong tax base and diversified mixture of land uses to compliment the many single-family neighborhoods with employment opportunities, retail and service destinations and multi-family housing options. The City retains a full-time staff person dedicated to economic development and undertakes economic development projects to sustain and support an environment where businesses can prosper and contribute to the desirable quality of life for which Edina is known. In recent years, a small portion of these activities have been included in the Administra- tive expenses of the General Fund with primary support from the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The Edina HRA was established in 1974 for the purpose of undertaking urban redevelopment projects and assisting with the development of affordable housing. The HRA has been the driving force behind many notable success stories. The HRA was responsible for planning and implementing streetscape and public parking improvements to revitalize the 50th and France commercial area. The HRA was also the lead partner to guide the development of Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes. Each of these projects includes a successful combination of public and private uses that were jointly developed. At Edinborough Park, the 1-acre indoor park and 1-acre outdoor park are complimented by professional office space, senior apartments and mixed-income townhouses. Centennial Lakes boasts a 25-acre park surrounded by Class A office buildings, popular shopping centers and multiple phases of townhouse developments. Each of these economic development projects has resulted in additional private sector investment in the areas that surround the initial public investment. The Edina HRA is an entity legally separate from the City with separate taxing authority. However, for financial report- ing purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of the City’s operations because the members of the City Council serve as HRA board members and its activity is confined to the City of Edina. The special revenue HRA Fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (tax increment, bond proceeds, investment earnings, etc.) that are designated for housing and redevelopment activities. Due to the involvement of tax increment financing (TIF) dollars, there are legal restrictions on how the money in this fund may be spent. The HRA Fund had a cumulative balance of $9,057,743 as of Dec. 31, 2014. The fund includes balances from decertified and active TIF Districts. Major expenditures are anticipated in the near future to eliminate the fund balance from older TIF Districts and strategically reduce the fund balance from Centennial Lakes TIF. Ongoing expenditures are attributed to the active TIF Districts as well as a new HRA levy anticipated for 2017. The salary of the Economic Development Manager and associated expenses are paid through the HRA. DR A F T 81 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HRA 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Establish new Grandview TIF district as well as prepare for transportation improvements in the district. Implement a plan to redevelop the former Public Works site. Adopt redevelopment strategy for City-owned properties on West 49-1/2 Street. Establish new Housing TIF to deliver new affordable housing at the 66 West site. Prepare agreements related to private improvements and related public infrastructure at Pentagon Park, including Phases IA, IB, and 2. Partner with Hennepin County to redevelop Southdale Regional Library property to include new library in addition to market-driven mixed-uses. Identify route for Phase 5 of Promenade. Complete study of Southdale area. Outreach to business community, including key employers, property owners, developers and brokers. Develop strategic plan for business attraction, development and retention. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Established new Pentagon Park TIF Redevelopment District. Completed master redevelopment agreement with Pentagon Revival to incent major investment. Achieved special legislation to use Southdale 2 TIF proceeds to fund new affordable housing. Helped bring new destination tenant to Southdale Center by revising outdated ordinance. Completed roadway and pedestrian improvements to France Avenue and Hazelton Road. Completed infrastructure improvements for Phase 4 of the promenade. Completed major restoration and improvements to the public parking ramps and streetscaping in the 50th & France commercial district. Acquired property at 3944 W. 49-1/2 Street for future redevelopment. Completed collaborative redevelopment planning for vacant, City-owned land at 5146 Eden Avenue (former Public Works site). Completed small area plan for Wooddale/Valley View node. DR A F T 82 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HRA PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Full time equivalent jobs within Edina* 48,148 48,741 49,627 Business Establishments within Edina * 2,755 2,733 2,746 Vacancy Rates in SW metro, including Edina** Retail Office Industrial 4.1% 15% 10.6% ??? ??? Non-Residential Tax Base within Edina*** $1.83 B $2.14 B $2.39 B State & Regional grants procured for development ($ awarded) $535,100 $625,000 TBD * Q1 per Bureau of Labor Statistics/ MN-DEED ** Source: Colliers Q3 Market Reports *** Source: Edina Assessing Department; estimated market value of commercial, industrial and apartment properties, in billions Personal services 2% Contractual services11% Commodities 0% Capital outlay 87% HRA Fund Expenditures by Type 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted HRA Fund Personal services 112,312$ 114,688$ 118,467$ 118,467$ 123,970$ 129,068$ Contractual services 1,077,559 1,443,672 100,620 6,120 655,865 679,865 Commodities - - 200 200 1,000 1,500 Capital outlay 2,711,056 7,218,933 400,000 3,685,000 4,000,000 12,175,000 Total 3,900,927$ 8,777,293$ 619,287$ 3,809,787$ 4,780,835$ 12,985,433$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Economic Development Expenditures DR A F T 83 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HRA At this time, Edina has two active TIF Districts (Southdale 2 and Pentagon Park). Three additional TIF Districts are included in the budget to account for expenditures of the remaining fund balances. The City & HRA also oversee two Special Assessment Districts: Grandview and 50th & France. These have been established to maintain and operate public parking ramps and to make other improvements to the public amenities. A summary of each TIF District and anticipated expenditures follows. The 2014 year end balances are identified on pages 100-104 of the 2014 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). This district was established in 1988 with the goal of attracting new investment to the under-developed portions of Southeast Edina that had formerly been a gravel pit. The District was decertified in 2014 and retained a balance of $11,584,070 as of 12/31/2014. The balance is intended to be invested in redevelopment projects over the next five years. Centennial Lakes TIF Redevelopment District Anticipated expenses for 2016-2017 include: Building demolition and site preparation at 3944 West 49-1/2 Street Urban planning for 50th & France Updated traffic model of Greater Southdale area Parking improvements at 50th & France, including expansion of North Parking Ramp Intersection improvements at France Ave & Highway 62 (design and initial construction) Gateway signage at entry points to Edina Strategic land acquisition to promote redevelopment in the Grandview District 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Centennial TIF District Personal services 102,524$ 89,437$ 118,467$ 118,467$ 49,588$ 25,813$ Contractual services 906,851 1,265,039 6,120 6,120 237,865 15,000 Commodities - - 200 200 1,000 - Capital outlay 2,709,357 7,217,315 400,000 - 3,375,000 5,500,000 Total 3,718,732$ 8,571,791$ 524,787$ 124,787$ 3,663,453$ 5,540,813$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Centennial TIF District Tax Increment Finance Districts DR A F T 84 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HRA This district was established in 1984 with the general goal of attracting new investment to the older industrial areas near Highway 100 and Vernon Avenue. Tax proceeds were used to assemble property, remediate environmental contamination and support the development of three condominium buildings, a Class A office building and a public library and senior center. Additional streetscape improvements were also completed. The District was decertified in 2010 and retained a balance of $401,143 as of 12/31/2014. The balance is intended to be invested in redevelopment planning in the Grandview District over the next two years. Grandview (I) TIF Redevelopment District Anticipated expenses for 2016-2017 include: District-wide transportation study Concept study for Highway 100 “cap” at Vernon Ave. Grandview 2 TIF District to achieve additional redevelopment 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Grandview TIF District Personal services 9,788$ 17,792$ -$ -$ 24,794$ 12,907$ Contractual services 167,843 28,810 93,000 - 326,500 1,500 Commodities - - - - - - Capital outlay - - - 3,685,000 - - Total 177,631$ 46,602$ 93,000$ 3,685,000$ 351,294$ 14,407$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Grandview TIF DistrictDR A F T 85 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HRA Three TIF Districts were created in 1990 to encourage redevelopment and economic development at three commercial nodes in Edina. The 70th & Cahill District, 44th & France District and Wooddale Valley View Districts were decertified in 1999. The remaining balances were pooled together and the cumulative balance as of 12/31/2014 is $364,149. This balance is intended to be invested in redevelopment projects in these districts over the next three to five years. 70th & Cahill TIF Redevelopment District Anticipated expenses for 2016-2017 include: Streetscape improvements on Wooddale, ap- proximately $100,000 Small area plan for 70th & Cahill Financial support will also be considered for additional projects that contribute to the goals 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Pentagon Park TIF District Personal services -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Contractual services - 26,215 - - 15,000 - Commodities - - - - - - Capital outlay 1,699 1,618 - - 75,000 - Total 1,699$ 27,833$ -$ -$ 90,000$ -$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. 70th & Cahill TIF District DR A F T 86 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HRA Pentagon Park TIF Redevelopment District This district was created in 2014 in order to attract first-class investment to this outdated office park that had suffered from disinvestment over the past several years. The District is anticipated to terminate in 2043. The City entered into a Master Redevelopment Agreement with Pentagon Revival, LLC in 2014 and laid out a timeline for the private and sectors to reinvest in this area. While incremental taxes will not be collected until 2018, preliminary planning is under- way so that this multi-phase project can be successful in the marketplace and reflect the goals of the community. This District had a negative fund balance of $6,141 as of 12/31/2014. Anticipated expenses for 2016-2017 include: Prepare TIF financing agreements for Phases 1A, 1B and 2 Prepare funding agreements for public improvements related to Phases 1A, 1B & 2; including improvements to West 77th Street, Parklawn, Viking and Computer Drive, new 76th Street and new ‘living streets’ connecting 77th & 76th Streets 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Pentagon Park TIF District Personal services -$ 5,938$ -$ -$ 24,794$ 12,907$ Contractual services - 44,514 1,500 - 25,000 625,000 Commodities - - - - - - Capital outlay - - - - - 6,675,000 Total -$ 50,452$ 1,500$ -$ 49,794$ 7,312,907$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Pentagon Park TIF District DR A F T 87 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HRA This district was created in 2010 to spur investment in and around Southdale Center Mall and is anticipated to termi- nate in 2021. The City entered into an agreement with the owners of Southdale Center to provide a $5 million no- interest loan if they would invest at least $15 million into the common areas of the shopping center. This work was completed in 2012. As of 12/31/2014, this district had a negative fund balance of $4,368,912. This is due to the TIF loan that is being repaid over the remaining life of the District. In 2014, Edina was granted special legislation to use monies from this district to support the construction of new affordably-priced housing in Edina. Southdale 2 TIF Economic Development District Anticipated expenses for 2016-2017 include: Repayment of $5 million TIF loan (principal & interest) from Centennial Lakes District 66 West apartments, $550,000 grant for 39 affordably-priced housing units Financial support will be considered for additional housing projects that include units that are affordably-priced for households earning 60% of the Area Median Income. 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Southdale 2 TIF District Personal services -$ 1,521$ -$ -$ 24,794$ 12,907$ Contractual services 2,865 79,094 - - 51,500 1,500 Commodities - - - - - - Capital outlay - - - - - - Total 2,865$ 80,615$ -$ -$ 76,294$ 14,407$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Southdale 2 TIF District DR A F T 88 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/HRA Centennial Lakes 65% Grandview 13% Southdale 2 0% Pentagon Park 22% 70th & Cahill 0% HRA Fund Expenditures by TIF District 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted TIF District Centennial Lakes 3,718,732$ 8,571,791$ 524,787$ 124,787$ 3,663,453$ 5,540,813$ Grandview 177,631 46,602 93,000 3,685,000 351,294 14,407 Southdale 2 2,865 80,615 - - 76,294 14,407 Pentagon Park - 50,452 1,500 - 49,794 7,312,907 70th & Cahill 1,699 27,833 - - 90,000 - Total 3,899,228$ 8,749,460$ 619,287$ 3,809,787$ 4,140,835$ 12,882,534$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Expenditures by TIF DistrictDR A F T 89 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA C OMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Jennifer Bennerotte, Director jbennerrotte@EdinaMN.gov 952-833-9520 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW While communications has always been an integral part of local government, the City of Edina’s Communications Department was formally established in 2006. As technology was integrated into City operations, so grew the City’s Information Technology staff. The I.T. Department was formally established in 2010. In 2012, the two departments were merged to become the Communications & Technology Services Department. It's the job of the Communications & Technology Services Department to help other City departments and facilities identify what information and messages need to be conveyed to Edina's diverse audiences and make sure that this is done in the most effective manner possible. The Department includes 11 full-time employees and 10 part-time employees. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Administration of public and education access channels for Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Building Security Systems and Access End-User Support and Training Network Management Marketing Media and Public Relations Publication of the City’s Newsletters and Magazine Telecommunications Video Production and Administration of Government Access Channels Development and Oversight of Websites and Social Media Sites DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 90 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2016-2017 DEPARTMENT GOALS Redesign the City’s website, www.EdinaMN.gov. Advocate for and advance the use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) in all City operations. Implement high-definition webstreaming. Complete brand audits at all major City facilities. Set up and program PEG channels on CenturyLink. 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Reorganized staff in Communications and Information Technology divisions. Developed mobile app, Edina to Go. Implemented network server and storage visualization. Launched an employee extranet, Edinet. Implemented a new help desk system for responding to employees’ needs. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Completion of help desk/internal service requests 5,493 8,091 4,351 Quality of Life Survey – Percentage of residents who find About Town to be an effective communications tool for keeping them informed of City activities (very effective or somewhat effective) 92% N/A 82% Quality of Life Survey – Percentage of residents who find the City’s website “Excellent” or “Good” 98% N/A 73% COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT In 2015, the Communications & Technology Services Department received one Regional Emmy, another Regional Emmy nomination and 6 national awards — three from the National Association of Government Communicators (NAGC) and six from the City-County Communications & Marketing Association (3CMA). In 2014, the Department received two Regional Emmy nominations and 11 national awards — five from NAGC and six from 3CMA. *Through September 2015 DR A F T 91 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Communications 984,921$ 1,051,309$ 1,073,850$ 1,040,674$ 1,104,618$ 1,204,517$ General fund subtotal 984,921 1,051,309 1,073,850 1,040,674 1,104,618 1,204,517 Other Funds Technology central services 884,057 990,833 1,044,271 1,021,771 1,234,431 1,321,891 Construction 337,865 154,100 465,900 465,900 749,129 539,700 Department Total Budget 2,206,843$ 2,196,242$ 2,584,021$ 2,528,345$ 3,088,178$ 3,066,108$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Communications and Technology Services Department Expenditures Communications 44%Technology central services 56% Expenditures by Division DR A F T 92 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DIVISION OVERVIEW The Communications division works to find opportunities to promote what makes Edina the great community that it is and the successes of City government. Among other things, the Communications division is responsible for media and public relations; publication of the City's newsletters and magazines, including About Town; maintaining the City’s internal and external websites and social media sites; and administering the government access channels, Edina Chan- nels 16 and 813. COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Communications Division Edina was one of the first cities in Minnesota to begin broadcasting in high definition. Communications staff began broadcasting meetings in high definition in 2015 after the equipment in the Council Chambers at Edina City Hall was upgraded. All other content, including “Agenda: Edina,” “Beyond the Badge,” “Enterprise Edina” and public service announcements, has been broadcast in high definition since late 2013. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 93 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT—COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Launch mobile-friendly, redesigned website. Research feasibility of sign-on for third-party websites and develop such functionality wherever possible. Develop content calendars for all social media sites managed by the City. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Developed award-winning mobile app, Edina To Go. Developed award-winning employee extranet, Edinet. Hosted and promoted monthly “Speak Up, Edina” topics on www.SpeakUpEdina.org. Migrated email subscription service, “City Extra”, to MailChimp and grew base of subscribers. Began broadcasting government channel programming in high-definition and upgraded the City Council Chambers to high-definition equipment. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Social media fans/followers 16,828 24,939 26,442 Online viewership increases for Edina TV programming 44,668 76,807 96,650 Email subscriptions to “City Extra” lists 19,344 21,345 27,860 *Through September 2015 DR A F T 94 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT—COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 562,773$ 642,620$ 620,714$ 620,803$ 682,806$ 711,261$ Contractual services 325,455 298,899 327,700 303,935 224,700 259,700 Commodities 38,633 45,148 55,500 46,000 85,500 85,500 Central services 58,060 64,642 69,936 69,936 111,612 148,056 Capital outlay - - - - - - Construction Fund Equipment replacement 139,818 2,100 150,000 150,000 - - Capital outlay - - - - - - Total 1,124,739$ 1,053,409$ 1,223,850$ 1,190,674$ 1,104,618$ 1,204,517$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Communications Expenditures Personal services 56% Contractual services 25% Commodities 5% Central services 8% Capital outlay 0% Equipment replacement 6% Communications Expenditures by Type DR A F T 95 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Information Technology Division DIVISION OVERVIEW Besides the Director, the Information Technology division includes an I.T. Manager, I.T. Systems Administrator, I.T. Coordinator and three I.T. Specialists. The I.T. division’s primary goal is to enable access to City information and services conveniently, securely and efficiently. The I.T. division provides the central services required by City departments, offices and facilities, including data center operations, network and telecommunications services, end-user support for personal computers, strategic technology investigation, project oversight, and administration of the City’s hardware, software, and infrastructure contracts and agreements. They work to provide the vision, leadership and skills that will enable the City to benefit from technological innovation and improve service to the community. The I.T. division provides support to 540 domain users and 566 email users. At the beginning of 2015, the City’s computer inventory totaled more than 365 computers, 114 mobile devices and 30 servers. In 2015, LOGIS completed a detailed review of the City of Edina’s network security profile to determine compliancy with the LOGIS Member Security Policy. The audit found City of Edina has implemented many strong security baselines, though LOGIS made several recommendations to enhance the City’s security profile as it relates to industry best practices and BCA, PCI, and LOGIS policies. I.T. staff will work toward meeting those recommendations in the 2016-2017 budget cycle. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 96 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT—INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Complete server virtualization and investigate targeted desktop virtualization. Implement log management and file change management to ensure PCI compliance. Continue to improve the user experience for remote users. Implement LOGIS security audit recommendations to enhance the City’s security profile as it relates to industry best practices and BCA, PCI, and LOGIS policies 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Implemented network server and storage virtualization. Expanded fiber optic network to Braemar Field, Pamela Park and Edina Police Department precinct at Southdale Center. Updated technology in the Cahill room, Mayor’s Conference Room and Minnehaha Room at Edina City Hall and at the Edina Senior Center. Enhanced internal service levels through increased cross-training, documentation and training. Improved I.T. offerings for employees connecting to the network from mobile devices. Achieved PCI compliance at the City’s various enterprise facilities. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Number of smart mobile devices managed by the City of Edina 54 87 110 I.T. Client Survey — Percentage of employees who said the service provided and the results “exceeded expectations or more” 75% N/A 72% I.T. Client Survey — Percentage of employees who said service provided “exceeded expectations or more” in professionalism, receptiveness and helpfulness 75% N/A 88% Internal network and server up-time N/A N/A 100% *Through September 2015 DR A F T 97 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNICATIONS & TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DEPARTMENT—INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget Central Services (No Fund) Personal services 444,907$ 495,258$ 497,455$ 507,455$ 576,015$ 599,975$ Contractual services 338,011 401,811 429,750 411,750 529,850 604,850 Commodities 101,139 93,764 117,066 102,566 128,566 117,066 Construction Fund Equipment replacement 147,408 128,122 151,900 151,900 279,629 52,000 Capital outlay 50,639 23,878 164,000 164,000 469,500 487,700 Total 1,082,104$ 1,142,833$ 1,360,171$ 1,337,671$ 1,983,560$ 1,861,591$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Information Technology Expenditures Personal services 36% Contractual services 31% Commodities 8% Equipment replacement 10% Capital outlay 15% Information Technology Expenditures by Type DR A F T 98 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA UMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Kay McAloney, Director kmcaloney@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0415 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Human Resources Department is dedicated to working with other City departments to ensure that employment practices are aligned to meet the goals of the City. This work includes developing recruitment and selection systems to hire top talent. The Department is responsible for designing, implementing and negotiating cost-effective compensation and benefits plans that reward and retain the right talent to deliver quality services. Human Resources develops em- ployment policies based on best management practices and compliance with employment laws as well as employee per- formance management, training and development systems that align with City goals. The Human Resources Depart- ment also provides leadership consulting and training. and participates in effective employee and labor relations to bal- ance the needs of all stakeholders. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Recruitment and Selection Compensation and Benefits Employee and Labor Relations Employment Policies Employee Safety and Wellness Leadership and Organizational Development Performance Management Payroll Risk Management DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 99 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2016-2017 DEPARTMENT GOALS Implement electronic personnel files and develop implementation plan for upgrade of Human Resources Infor- mation Systems (HRIS) and payroll systems. Transition records to the City’s electronic records management system (EdinaDocs). Develop and implement a cost-effective strategy for health insurance changes required by healthcare reform. Develop and implement a comprehensive new employee onboarding program. 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed revision of major employment policies. Transitioned the City’s Property, Liability, and Worker’s Compensation insurance to the League of Minnesota Cit- ies Insurance Trust (LMCIT). Restructured payroll software to provide more efficient reconciliation and reporting. Implemented new technology to audit and streamline employee benefits administration. Moved over 200 employees to electronic timecard entry. Implemented new technology to streamline the onboarding of approximately 400 seasonal employees each year. Incorporated measures of Edina IQS (Integrity, Quality, Service) into the employee recruitment and performance review processes. Developed employee benefits portal for employee extranet. HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT For the 2016-2017 budget, expenses for payroll and the City’s property and liability insurance are reflected in the Human Resources Budget. Previously, payroll was reflected in Finance and Insurance was in Administration. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Number of worker's compensation claims resulting in lost time or medical treatment 31 36 21 Number of external recruitments processes conducted for full-time, part- time, and seasonal positions. 86 83 72 Number of regular full-time employees who left employment with the City of Edina, excluding retirements. 4 13 15 * Through September 2015 DR A F T 100 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 432,746$ 446,268$ 506,200$ 435,243$ 525,553$ 547,747$ Severance payments 336,499 481,617 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Contractual services 50,876 30,051 36,440 35,000 37,200 37,200 Commodities 973 4,437 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Central services - 17,500 19,644 19,644 25,092 25,308 General fund subtotal 821,094 979,873 764,784 692,387 790,345 812,755 Other Funds Risk management fund - - - - 665,000 665,000 Employee shared services 57,197 121,315 256,200 252,700 227,800 228,300 Construction fund - - - - - - Department Total Budget 878,291$ 1,101,188$ 1,020,984$ 945,087$ 1,683,145$ 1,706,055$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Human Resources Department Expenditures Personal services 29% Severance payments 16% Contractual services 54% Commodities 0% Central services 1% Expenditures by Type DR A F T 101 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INANCE Eric Roggeman, Director eroggeman@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0414 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW Finance provides accounting and control services for all financial activities of the City, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA), the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, and other auxiliary organizations. The department is also responsible for revenue collections, disbursements and investments, preparation of the annual budget and financial statements of the City. Periodically, the department will also perform custom financial analysis for various proposals. The Finance Department is responsible for generating about 55,000 utility bills and 15,000 vendor payments annually. The department is also responsible for managing the City’s debt and investments as well as preparing the City budget, annual financial report (CAFR), and capital improvement plan (CIP). MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Accounting Accounts payable Budget & CIP compilation Finance administration Financial reporting Revenue collections Tax compliance Treasury & debt administration Utility billing DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART The Finance Department received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting for our CAFR from the Government Finance Officers Association of the US & Canada (GFOA) for our 2014 report. This was the ninth consecutive year the department received the award. DR A F T 102 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCE DEPARTMENT 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Received an unqualified (clean) opinion from the independent auditors for the 2014 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Implemented an electronic payment program for City vendors. Over 100 vendors have enrolled in the program and over $5 million in payments were made through the program in the first year of implementation. Received the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Distinguished Budget Presentation Award for the City’s 2014-2015 Budget book. Implemented an eUtility Billing system, allowing residents to view and pay their utility bills online. Currently, over 900 households are enrolled and using the program. Successful completion of audits by the MN Department of Revenue related to Sales Tax and MinnesotaCare Tax (Ambulance) with no reportable findings. 2016-2017 DEPARTMENT GOALS Convert water meter readings from 100 cubic foot units to gallons to increase transparency and customer understanding of water bills. Implement an automated accounts payable system that is configurable to the City’s workflow, is capable of reading invoices using optical character recognition, and allows for electronic coding and approval of invoices. Work with the City’s Communication & Technology Services Department to make improvements to the Finance Department’s webpage; allowing residents to more easily access important financial documents. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Receive unqualified audit report Yes Yes TBD Receive the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Re- porting for our CAFR from the Government Finance Officers Associa- tion of the US & Canada (GFOA) Yes Yes TBD Standard & Poor’s debt credit rating AAA AAA AAA Moody’s debt credit rating Aaa Aaa Aaa Receive the Distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Gov- ernment Finance Officers Association of the US & Canada (GFOA) N/A* Yes N/A* * The City completes a biennial budget, and first applied for the budget award with completion of the 2014-2015 budget book. DR A F T 103 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADVANCEMENTS IN SERVICES The Finance Department is seeing a rapid change in service areas due to changing technology. These new services are in addition to current business operations. The City expects to process around 5,500 electronic payments in 2016, which includes ACH and purchasing card pay- ments. This represents about one-third of the total, and is an increase from 4,000 from 2012. Residents have the option to pay their utility bills a variety of ways. The City accepts credit cards through an automatic payment plan, by phone, or in-person at City Hall. Electronic ACH payments are also accepted through an automatic payment plan or through a couple of different bank billpay companies. Despite rapid growth in electronic receipts, the most popular payment method for our customers remains cash and checks, at over 50%. The rapid growth in elec- tronic receipts starting in 2014 is the result of a new online bill view and payment service. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Projected 2017 Projected Utility Receipts by Payment Option Credit card (autopay, by phone or at City Hall) ACH (autopay or bank billpay) Cash or Check (mail or at City Hall) ‐ 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2014 Projected 2015 Projected Vendor Payments by Type Paper checks ACH Purchasing cards DR A F T 104 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCE DEPARTMENT 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 531,918$ 498,390$ 534,500$ 630,730$ 528,028$ 550,309$ Contractual services 141,576 208,847 239,450 212,700 242,900 267,100 Commodities 1,863 9,258 15,700 4,500 14,000 14,100 Central services 65,443 52,934 56,988 56,988 48,696 49,236 General fund subtotal 740,800 769,429 846,638 904,918 833,624 880,745 Other Funds Utility 41,301 246,418 292,381 286,381 298,393 309,404 Construction - - - - 50,000 - Department Total Budget 782,101$ 1,015,847$ 1,139,019$ 1,191,299$ 1,182,017$ 1,190,149$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Finance Department Expenditures & Expenses Admin & treasury 23% Budget, accounting & reporting 33% Accounts payable 12% Revenue collections & tax compliance 13% Utility billing 19% Estimated Expenditures by Service Area DR A F T 105 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA UBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Brian Olson, Director bolson@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0311 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW Edina's infrastructure -- its parks, streets and curbs, storm and sanitary sewers, bridges, walking paths and sidewalks, water mains, hydrants, pumping stations and wells (all the behind-the-scenes equipment and structures that form the physical backbone of the City) -- are in the care of the employees of Edina's Public Works Department. The Public Works Department is comprised of the Streets (Bituminous and Concrete), Park Maintenance, Utilities, Facilities (including HVAC and Electrical) and Equipment Operations divisions. Employees of each of these divisions efficiently and responsibly care for over 40 parks, 230 miles of roadway, 18 deep water wells, four water treatment plants, four water towers with a three million-gallon total capacity, four million gallons of water in underground reser- voir, 23 sanitary sewer lift stations, 11 storm sewer lift stations, 80 miles of storm sewer mains, 180 miles of sanitary sewer mains, 200 miles of water mains, 25 miles of sidewalk and eight miles of walking paths, 4 municipal parking ramps, $8 million in rolling stock (vehicles and equipment), including automobiles, mowers, trucks of every description, snowplows, street sweepers, fire trucks, ambulances, and police cars. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Asphalt Street Maintenance Concrete Street Maintenance Utility Operations Facility Maintenance Parks Maintenance Equipment Operations DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 106 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2016-2017 DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Implement an on-call policy to improve service response to emergencies. Complete the floor and fire sprinkler system at the cold storage facility. Focus on integration, implementation and training for technology associated with mobile Edina to Go application. 2014-2015 DEPARTMENTAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Upgraded CityWorks work order system. “No fault” insurance established through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Implemented fleet maintenance software upgrade. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Percentage of residents rating the quality of the City’s sanitary sewer services as “excellent” or “good” in the Quality of Life Survey. 97% N/A 83% Total number of invoices processed 5,798 6,017 3,933* Total number of work orders written 2,447 2,968 TBD * Through September 2015 DR A F T 107 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Administration 3% Streets 18% Park maintenance 11% Property management 3% Equipment operations 7%Construction 5% Environmental Efficiency 1% Utility operations 52% Budgeted Expenditures and Expenses by Division and/or Service Area 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Administration 708,582$ 846,092$ 817,724$ 817,824$ 948,702$ 974,463$ Streets 4,444,686 4,486,520 4,880,755 4,727,255 4,861,481 5,003,380 Park maintenance 2,645,523 2,835,246 2,953,081 2,914,531 3,116,417 3,250,111 General fund subtotal 7,798,791 8,167,858 8,651,560 8,459,610 8,926,600 9,227,954 Other Funds Property management 865,152 881,942 1,030,312 997,964 954,666 971,522 Equipment operations 1,772,497 1,795,918 1,856,932 1,824,432 1,849,549 1,902,120 Construction 531,388 3,424,712 776,872 776,872 1,251,836 1,237,935 Environmental Efficiency - - 327,036 327,036 104,000 - Utility operations 13,099,447 13,384,256 14,067,575 13,350,060 14,783,880 15,375,873 Department Total Budget 24,067,275$ 27,654,686$ 26,710,287$ 25,735,974$ 27,870,531$ 28,715,404$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Public Works Department Expenditures & ExpensesDR A F T 108 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Parks Maintenance Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The City of Edina prides itself in providing premier public facilities. The Park Maintenance division operates nearly 40 parks and recreational facilities, including Arneson Acres, Todd, Pamela, Arden, and Highlands Parks and over a dozen warming houses. The activities of the division support more than a dozen athletic associations that serve thousands of athletic participants. There are currently 16 staff in the Public Works Parks Maintenance Division. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 109 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT— PARKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Identify four special project areas annually for high intensity buckthorn removal projects. Complete replacement of equipment as scheduled in the capital improvement project. Prepare a response plan for the anticipated impact of the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) on trees in City right-of-ways and City-owned properties. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Utley Park bathrooms remodeled for ADA compliance and under budget. Resurfaced Van Valkenburg Park parking lot. Completed in-house construction of Garden Park dugouts. Hosted State Legion tournament at Courtney Fields. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Percentage of residents rating the quality of parks maintenance service as “excellent” or “good” in the Quality of Life Survey. 99% N/A 91% Percentage of residents rating the condition of trails and sidewalks as “excellent” or “good” in the Quality of Life Survey. 95% N/A 83% DR A F T 110 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT— PARKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION Personal services 61% Contractual services 16% Commodities 8% Central Services 12% Equipment replacement 3% Budgeted Expenditures by Type 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted General Fund Personal services 1,763,414$ 1,827,088$ 1,844,549$ 1,844,549$ 1,929,605$ 2,010,851$ Contractual services 382,753 468,693 508,000 458,450 542,100 576,800 Commodities 168,234 189,741 260,200 241,200 286,800 297,300 Central Services 331,122 349,724 340,332 370,332 357,912 365,160 Construction Fund Equipment replacemen 78,150 119,973 40,000 60,420 82,900 126,100 Total 2,723,673$ 2,955,219$ 2,993,081$ 2,974,951$ 3,199,317$ 3,376,211$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Park Maintenance ExpendituresDR A F T 111 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Facilities Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The Facilities Management Division supports all City departments by managing the long term viability of the City’s current physical infrastructure and by planning for future needs. The major facilities include City Hall, Public Works and Parks Maintenance Facility, City parking ramps and other non-City facilities including the exterior building services at Edina Community Library/Senior Center, the 50th & France Special Services District, park shelter buildings and utility buildings. The City maintains nearly 80 buildings. The Facilities Division includes the Electrical and HVAC Division of the City’s Public Works Department. It is responsible for the maintenance and repair of more than 40 park shelter buildings, utility buildings and well houses, City Hall and the Public Works building. It also maintains more than 400 street lights, City-owned traffic signals, and lighting fixtures for the more than 80 City facilities and the Electrical/HVAC needs at each of those facilities. They also manage and act as the first contact for each of the 2,500 Xcel Energy-owned street lights, 26 Hennepin County signals and 10 traffic signals owned by the State of Minnesota. The Public Works Electrical/HVAC Division maintains and repairs Electrical/HVAC needs for: 12 neighborhood street lighting systems and more than 400 City-owned street lights. Hockey rink lighting and athletic field lighting, warming house lighting/electrical maintenance and heating and air conditioning at 25 park facilities. Interior and exterior lighting, electrical maintenance, heating and A/C and a GEO thermal system at 63 City buildings, including Edina City Hall, Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility, two Fire Stations and three Edina Liquor stores. 13 City-owned traffic signals. Lighting and electrical needs in the four public parking ramps. In addition, the division locates all electrical underground wires, such as service wires and those for street light and traffic signals. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 112 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT— FACILITIES DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Development and implementation of program to retrofit industrial area lighting replacement Implementing Energy Efficiencies and Preventative Maintenance Plan through no and low cost maintenance and op- erational changes. Continue to respond to “light out” concerns in an efficient and timely manner. Complete the 4th year of our industrial LED lighting projects. Continue to implement traffic signal cabinet removal and replacement program. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Implemented the signal control cabinet replacement for 2 of the 13 City owned traffic signal controllers. Completed in-house electrical and HVAC modifications of the Utley Park remodel project. Implemented new FHWA regulations on crosswalk signal timing for City-maintained traffic signals. Completed the parking and wayfinding improvements in the 50th and France Business District. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Percentage of residents rating the quality of street lighting as “excellent” or “good” in the Quality of Life Survey. 93% N/A 69% Performance savings realized by building interior lighting improvements $33,748 $39,271 TBD Performance savings realized by improvements to building infrastructure related to heating and ventilation $14,312 $0 TBD Performance savings realized by solar panel installation at City Hall $1,465.56 $1,624.72 TBD DR A F T 113 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Streets Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The Streets Division is responsible for the year-round maintenance and repair of more than 230 miles of City streets, public parking lots, street signs and pavement markings. This responsibility is managed by two department divisions: Asphalt (bituminous/blacktop) and Concrete Streets. Ap- proximately 80 percent of Edina's streets are paved with a flexible bituminous pavement. All pothole repairs, street sweeping, crack sealing and a majority of overlay projects and sealcoating are performed by the Asphalt Streets crews. The Concrete Streets crews handle the concrete street repairs, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk replacements and maintenance of the City’s traffic signs. There are currently 23 Public Works staff in the Streets Divisions. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART There are an estimated 1,000 3’ x 6’ crosswalk blocks that are painted annually by the traffic safety branch of the Concrete Streets Division. In the off-season, Concrete Streets crews provide non-emergency maintenance services for City Hall. DR A F T 114 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT—STREETS DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Successful implementation of street rehabilitation programs (sealcoat, mill and overlay, concrete road repair, etc.). Implementation of Sign Maintenance Policy and annual bridge rehabilitation program. Full integration of Edina to Go application that allows concerns from residents to be easier logged and more efficiently tracked. Continue annual bridge rehabilitation program that will ensure the safety and stability of Edina’s bridges. Collaborate with Hennepin County to repaint traffic signal arms and posts on France Avenue from TH 62 to Minnesota Drive. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed annual mill and overlay program in the asphalt area and concrete rehabilitation program. Completed software upgrade for pothole crown sourcing application “Edina to Go”. Responded to 100-year flooding event and provided over 11,000 sand bags to residents in need. Implemented snow plow hotline during the winter storm events. In cooperation with the Engineering Department, implemented an annual bridge rehabilitation program. In cooperation with the Engineering Department, gained approval of the Sign Maintenance Policy to comply with PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Percentage of citizens rating street snow plowing as “excellent” or “good” in the Quality of Life Survey. 96% N/A 87% Tons of Asphalt pavement constructed 8,829 8,383 8,875 Cubic Yards of Concrete Pavement repair 560 396 560 Number of potholes filled 3,971 3,508 TBD *Through September 2015 DR A F T 115 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Utilities Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The City’s Utilities Division ensures that there is clean, safe water and that what goes down the drain stays down the drain. There are three main components of the Utilities Division: pump, treat and distribute drinking water; sanitary sewer collection; and storm water collection. All members of the Utilities Division are certified and licensed by both the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and vary individually in experience from 2 to 30 years working in the water/wastewater field. The City of Edina operates two separate water systems: The Morningside water system and the Edina water system. The Morningside system is supplied with treated surface water from the City of Minneapolis which utilizes Ultrafiltra- tion, lime softening and multiple chemical treatments. While the water is from Minneapolis, Edina’s Utilities Division maintains the system’s piping. The Edina system gets its water from 18 groundwater wells. All well water is treated with fluoride (for public health and wellness), chlorine (disinfectant) and polyphosphates (pipe corrosion inhibitor). Water Treatment Plants are used for the additional removal of iron and manganese, naturally occurring minerals com- mon to groundwater. Once the water has been treated, it is distributed through a system of 200 miles of water main, four water towers and a ground reservoir. Sewage collection and flow is based on gravity and controlled by lift stations and pumps. The City collects and pumps sewage to a neighboring community where it eventually goes to a wastewater treatment facility operated by the Metro Council Environmental Service. The City also collects storm water. During and after a rain or melt event, it is crucial that water is removed quickly from roadways so it doesn’t create a public safety issue. However, instead of being sent to a treatment plant, it is rout- ed to our creeks, ponds, lakes and wetlands. These highly visible areas serve as natural treatment facilities for our storm water, create wildlife habitat and add to the aesthetics of our neighborhoods. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 116 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT—UTILITIES DIVISION 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Implemented “no fault” insurance plan for residents who experience sewer backups. Created and began the implementation of a hydrant maintenance program. Completed emergency repair and rehabilitations on Wells 13 and Well 9. Upgraded radio system for second leg of SCADA system. 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Complete the scheduled maintenance rehabilitations of Wells 2, 8, and 10. Complete the hydrant maintenance program. Complete the Southdale Tower maintenance (cleaning, inspection, design) Coordinate and complete the installation of meters in every City owned building PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Operating cost per 1,000,000 gallons water pumped/produced $1,385 $1,317 TBD Number of water main breaks and water service leaks 82 83 TBD Number of sewer backups or blockages 13 20 TBD Percentage of unaccounted water 0.97% 2.28% TBD 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budgeted Budgeted Budgeted Operating expenses Cost of sales and services - 1,392 - - - - Personal services 1,547,580 1,547,047 1,565,488 1,565,488 1,792,171 1,867,698 Contractual services 6,021,636 5,942,796 6,221,279 5,999,500 6,554,488 6,832,607 Commodities 880,738 815,579 1,025,200 993,000 1,059,250 1,110,200 Central services 645,865 672,067 701,748 701,748 674,808 688,596 Depreciation 3,148,601 3,642,117 3,951,036 3,487,500 4,227,000 4,499,500 Bond interest and other 855,027 763,258 602,824 602,824 476,163 377,272 Total expenses 13,099,447 13,384,256 14,067,575 13,350,060 14,783,880 15,375,873 *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Utilities Division ExpensesDR A F T 117 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Equipment Operations Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The Equipment Operations division serves as the City’s auto shop. It maintains more than $8 million worth of vehicles and rolling stock. The mechanics that make up this division do all of the routine maintenance, but also are available for the emergency repairs necessary to keep our fleet in operation during critical events such as snow plowing. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed the upgrade of Fleet Management software. Implemented a scoring methodology for vehicle replacement forecasting PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Percentage of internal customers that rated service as “good” or “excellent” 91.9% N/A 94.2% Total amount of unleaded fuel used 90,218 104,222 74,648 Total amount of diesel fuel used 66,036 79,097 51,015 Number of repair orders 3,489 6,595 1,837 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Continue weekly inspections of emergency vehicle apparatuses. Strategically implement equipment replacement plan. *Through September 2015 DR A F T 118 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NGINEERING DEPARTMENT Chad Millner, Director cmillner@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0318 DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Engineering Department is responsible for the planning, design and construction of the City’s infrastructure, in- cluding the sidewalk system and bikeway systems, local and Municipal State Aid street systems, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, and street lighting systems as well as other projects that support residents and businesses. Staff ensures that projects meet design standards and engineering requirements. The Engineering Department provides staff liaisons to the Energy & Environment Commission and the Transportation Commission. The Engineering Department also works directly with other local, regional and state agencies. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Design, Construction and Project Management of Infrastructure Projects Transportation Environmental Services Asset Management GIS DR A F T 119 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 2014-2015 DEPARTMENTAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS Renewed aging road infrastructure by reconstructing 10.3 and 1.0 miles of local neighborhood and MSA streets. Improved safety of traveling public and promoted walkability of neighborhoods by constructing 1.6 miles of side- walks. Renewed aging water infrastructure by replacing or rehabilitating 9,400 and 3,400 feet of water main, 97 fire hy- drants, and 127 gate valves. Renewed aging infrastructure and reduced risk of sanitary backup by removing potential inflow and infiltration and rehabilitating more than 30,000 feet of sanitary sewer trunk pipe. Reduced the risk to infrastructure and enabled more efficient operations by implementing right-of-way and asset management practices which included the complete inventory and mapping of the following assets: sanitary system, water system, streetlights and street signs. Completed the planning and prioritization of a Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Plan. Refined Infrastructure Condition Assessments and Selection Criteria for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Pro- jects. Improved residential and commercial redevelopment permit review processes by engaging with City planning and building code enforcement. 2016-2017 DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Update and develop surface water plans and policy to meet growing demands related to trend of increased rainfall and runoff from changing climate and redevelopment. Implement water resource management plan projects includ- ing flood protection and water quality improvements. Continue to assess risks and maintain and improve the level of service provided from the public utility systems. Define infrastructure needs by assessing road and utility condition for MSA Street Reconstruction Projects. Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety by implementing projects funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS). Provide superior (timely and relevant) customer service to internal and external customers. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Survey Rating from Residents of the Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects 58% 70% TBD Miles of sidewalks constructed 0.7 1.6 3.5* Stormwater and erosion control plans reviewed 243 279 251* * Through September 2015 DR A F T 120 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Engineering 16% PACS fund 11% CAS Fund 1% Construction 70% Utility fund 2% Expenditures and Expenses by Service Area 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Engineering 1,547,916$ 1,501,316$ 1,744,095$ 1,735,095$ 1,585,209$ 1,642,170$ General fund subtotal 1,547,916 1,501,316 1,744,095 1,735,095 1,585,209 1,642,170 Other Funds PACS fund 542,024 914,823 1,540,303 1,551,303 1,252,566 1,167,265 CAS Fund - - - - 153,126 157,495 Construction 4,262,011 5,279,103 10,463,193 10,463,193 8,251,528 4,285,605 Utility fund 146,836 101,387 177,000 177,000 239,096 243,254 Department Total Budget 6,498,787$ 7,796,629$ 13,924,591$ 13,926,591$ 11,481,525$ 7,495,789$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Engineering Department Expenditures & ExpensesDR A F T 121 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Design and Construction Division DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DIVISION OVERVIEW The Design and Constriction Division is responsible for the design and construction of the City’s infrastructure. Staff utilizes the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to prioritize street reconstruction projects, factoring in water main and water service breaks, storm sewer and drainage concerns, sanitary sewer condition concerns and transportation is- sues. Streets are grouped together in neighborhoods for major reconstruction and maintenance projects. Division Service Areas include: Design and coordination of the reconstruction of neighborhood and MSA roadways. Design and coordinate the rehabilitation of utility infrastructure. Coordinate bridge inspections and rehabilitations. Implement Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) projects. Coordinate various projects with MN/DOT and Hennepin County. Assist the Parks & Recreation and Communication & Technology Services Departments with design and coordina- tion of infrastructure improvement projects. DR A F T 122 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Successfully constructed 10.3 and 1.0 miles of local neighborhood and MSA streets. Installed more than 8,000 feet of raw water main connecting to new Water Treatment Plant #6. Improved performance of the water infrastructure system by replacing and rehabilitating more than 11,000 feet of water main, 97 fire hydrants, and 127 gate valves. Reduced potential inflow and infiltration by rehabilitating over 30,000 ft. of sanitary sewer trunk pipe. Reduced localized flooding risk by coordinating stormwater conveyance improvements within the Countryside F and Bredesen Park D Neighborhood reconstruction areas. Installed 1.0 mile of bicycle lane striping and/or route markers. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT—DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Improve communications with residents during the Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Projects through im- proved meeting materials, increased use of City Extra, efficient use of the City's website and feedback from post project surveys. Plan, design, and coordinate street reconstruction utilizing the Living Streets Plan. Continue to Refine Infrastructure Condition Assessments and Selection Criteria for Neighborhood Street Recon- struction Projects. Define Infrastructure Condition Assessments and Selection Criteria for MSA Street Reconstruction Projects. PERFORMANCE MEASURES Survey Rating from Residents of the Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects 58% 70% TBD Overall Citywide Pavement Condition Index (PCI) 51 54 57 DR A F T 123 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Transportation Division PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Number of requested and resolved traffic safety issues throughout the City 90/82 126/117 122/111 Miles of sidewalks constructed 0.7 1.6 3.0 Mile of bikeways constructed 4.6 1.0 0.5 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Continue to prioritize and implement sidewalk and bicycle master plans. Continue to implement the PACS Fund and Living Street programs. Conduct transportation studies for key redevelopment sites throughout the City, including the Grandview District and greater Southdale Area. DIVISION OVERVIEW The Transportation Division is responsible for the planning, design and management of local transportation systems and facilities in the City of Edina. The division considers social, environmental and aesthetic impacts of those systems when designing projects. Staff work directly with the Transportation Commission on matters related to transportation systems. Division Service Areas include: Oversees the planning and design of traffic operations. Administers the Living Streets program and Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. Manages the PACS fund budget. Serves as the staff liaison to the Transportation Commission. Coordinates non-motorized transportation facilities (NMTF) marketing and promotional activities aimed at further- ing education in the City. Receives and reviews resident requests for traffic control or calming devices throughout the City, conducts the appropriate level of analysis and makes recommendations. Assists with the preparation and review of City policies related to transportation and traffic systems planning, de- sign and maintenance. The Transportation Division includes the Transportation Planner and Traffic Safety Coordinator. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Branded and implemented the Living Streets Plan Created a new Sidewalk Facilities Map and amended it into the Comprehensive Plan Fully implemented the PACS Fund program Successfully constructed over five miles of new sidewalk Received a Bicycle-Friendly Community Award at the bronze-level Initiated a staff-led annual bicycle and pedestrian counting program *Through September 2015 DR A F T 124 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT—TRANSPORTATION DIVISION PACS Fund The Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS Fund) is a special revenue fund created to account for new utility franchise fee revenues from both Xcel and CenterPoint residential customers. The utility franchise fees are dedicated revenue to the PACS Fund. Other potential revenues for the PACS Fund may include grants, gifts, special assessments and transfers from other City funds. The purpose of the PACS Fund is to provide funding for the creation, maintenance and improvement of non‐motorized transportation facilities for the primary benefit of pedestrians and cyclists in Edina. Non‐motorized transportation facilities (NMTF) shall be defined as sidewalks, trails and other bicyclist‐related facilities. In 2015 and 2016 the franchise fees are expected to generate approximately $1.1 million each year in new revenue. 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimate Budget Budget Budget Revenues & other financing Franchise fees 1,018,308$ 1,144,167$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ Intergovernmental 15,000 - - - - - Investment Income 1,078 7,790 - - - - Total revenues 1,034,386 1,151,957 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Expenditures & other financing Personal services - 1,079 - - 112,566 117,265 Contractual services - 15,726 20,000 23,000 20,000 20,000 Commodities - 53 20,000 28,000 20,000 20,000 Central services 80,004 79,752 81,744 81,744 - - Capital outlay 462,020 818,213 1,418,559 1,418,559 1,100,000 1,010,000 Total expenses 542,024 914,823 1,540,303 1,551,303 1,252,566 1,167,265 Change in fund balance 492,362 237,134 (340,303) (351,303) (52,566) 32,735 January 1 balance - 492,362 729,496 389,193 37,890 (14,676) December 31 balance 492,362$ 729,496$ 389,193$ 37,890$ (14,676)$ 18,059$ PACS Fund Financial Summary Personal services 9% Contractual services 2% Commodities 2% Central services 0% Capital outlay 87% PACS Fund Expenditures DR A F T 125 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT—TRANSPORTATION DIVISION PACS Fund (cont.) Projects Scheduled for 2017* Hansen Road Sidewalk 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Darcy LN to W 60th St Code Avenue Sidewalk 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Valley View Rd to W 60th St Maddox Lane Sidewalk 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Hansen Rd to Mildred Ave Valley View Road Sidewalk 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Mildred Ave to Code Ave Xerxes Avenue South Sidewalk Stand-alone Project 56th Street to 58th Street Highway 169 Frontage Rd Sidewalk Stand-alone Project Braemar Blvd to Valley View Rd Two miscellaneous enhanced pedestri- an (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon) crossings TBD Miscellaneous bicycle facility pavement markings TBD *Projects are subject to change. Projects Scheduled for 2016* Notes Location Concord Avenue Sidewalk 2016 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Southview Ln to Lakeview Dr Beard Avenue South Sidewalk 2016 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements W 60th St to Service Road Xerxes Avenue South Sidewalk Stand-alone Project 58th Street to 60th Street Oaklawn Avenue Sidewalk Connect to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail “On-Ramp” (funded by Three Rivers Park District) W 72nd St to south of Gilford Dr W 64th Street Sidewalk Stand-alone project at Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon crossing York Avenue to Xerxes Ave S Wooddale Avenue Sidewalk WVV Small Area Plan recommendation Fairfax Avenue to Valley View Rd Tracy Avenue Sidewalk and Bicycle Facility State Aid reconstruction Benton Ave to Hwy 62 ramps Tracy Avenue Coincident with roundabout construction Valley Ln to Hwy 62 Valley View/Valley Ln Roundabout Sidewalk and Bicycle Facility Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail crossing Valley View/Valley Ln Roundabout Two miscellaneous enhanced pedestrian (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon) crossings TBD Miscellaneous bicycle facility pavement markings TBD DR A F T 126 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Environmental Division DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART One Engineering Technician has been added to the Environmental Division. There will also be a dedicated employee added for the new CAS Fund. The budget reflects the change in staffing levels for the Division. DIVISION OVERVIEW The Environmental Engineering Division provides engineering support services, programmatic services, outreach, en- gagement and policy review, and other specialty municipal, energy, or environmental projects. In 2015, the City Coun- cil approved the creation of the Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) Fund. It is a special revenue fund with dedicated revenue from utility franchise fees. The revenue will be used to pay for devoted staffing and initiatives that are meant to further the City of Edina’s goals for environmental protection. Division Service Areas include: Engineering support services: geographic information systems management, asset management system, analysis, util- ity system planning, and staff training Programmatic services: Right-of-way management, development and permit review, inspection and enforcement, floodplain management, sanitary I/I reduction, stormwater management, stormwater pollution prevention, compre- hensive water resources management planning and implementation, and related natural resources and water con- servation activities. Outreach, engagement and policy review: Residential redevelopment, water resource and pollution prevention pol- icy review, serving as liaison to Energy & Environment Commission, and sustainability review. DR A F T 127 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT—ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Acquired responsibility for the grading permitting process, stormwater and erosion control plan review, and in- spection and enforcement duties. Implemented mobile, server based GIS and Asset Management software programs as well as the PublicStuff mobile application. Secured the following grant funding: $20,000 for targeted street sweeping for water quality, $25,000 driving range prairie and forest management and $185,000 for inflow and infiltration abatement. Amended the policy and comprehensive water resource management plan for Lakes and Pond services. Successful FEMA floodplain appeal based on technical merit. Created new Conservation and Sustainability Fund to enhance and further environmental protection goals of the City. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Total City building energy use (kBtu) 75.6M 83.4M TBD Total City building energy use cost (B3) $1.23M $1.34M TBD GIS Service Requests 1700 1546 1892 GIS work orders 600 1064 674 Water Resources education and outreach audience 1 About Town article, 3 lakes group meetings, and 2 public events 2 About Town articles, 4 lakes group meetings and 4 public events 1 About Town article, 3 lakes group meetings and 1 public event Site grading, erosion and sediment inspections/enforcements NA/NA 278/28 568/10 Stormwater and erosion control plan reviews 243 279 251 Right-of-way permits processed 255 371 354 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Accelerate the adoption of mobile GIS and asset management tools and integrate with and develop new public website maps and tools. Continue improving the permitting, grading, erosion and sediment control process. Continue to provide excellent customer service levels while increasing public health, safety and welfare through the enforcement of engineering standards. Update the City’s floodplain ordinance and revise the City’s Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. *Through September 2015 DR A F T 128 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OLICE DEPARTMENT Dave Nelson, Police Chief dnelson@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0487 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Edina Police Department’s 52 sworn officers and 31 civilian staff consistently deliver outstanding police services, even as they face a variety of law enforcement challenges. The Department is called upon to perform many emergency and public service tasks throughout the year and is also responsible for educating the public in crime prevention tech- niques and investigating all felony crimes against persons, as well as other crimes. In 2014, the City reported 992 major Part I crimes, such as burglary, robbery, assault and theft, with an additional 686 Part II or lesser crimes. This was an increase of 5.3% from 2013. More than 80% of the Police budget is directly or indirectly spent on labor. The Police Department operates 7 days a week, 24 hours per day and maintains an average patrol strength of 5.2 offic- ers at any given time. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Patrol Traffic Animal Control 911 Dispatch Investigations School Resource Officers Drug Task Force Computer Forensics Civilian Services Community Health Property and Evidence Crime Prevention DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 129 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT 2016-2017 DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Increase patrol and dispatch staffing levels due to population growth and call-load demands associated with the addition of new multi-unit housing developments. Acquire and implement Mobile Pro Systems self-sustaining surveillance equipment to aid crime prevention efforts. Add one civilian FTE in Admin/Support Unit to accommodate workload associated with increased video technology demands. Transition Crime Prevention position to Crime Analyst to effectively identify, analyze and address crime patterns. 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Began using PATROL Online training program as a cost-effective and convenient training tool for officers. Purchased and implemented two License Plate Reader (LPR) units to aid in crime prevention. Due to a greater than 20% attrition rate over two years, successfully hired and trained a total of 14 new officers and facilitated 9 internal promotions. The department was awarded a 4-year grant to fund an additional officer dedicated to impaired driving enforcement, increasing the safety of our citizens and roadways. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015** Percentage of respondents rating police services as “Excellent” or “Good”* 97% N/A* 90% Cost of police services per household $557.91 $565.68 $552.76 Total number of false residential and commercial alarms 1,150 1,096 827 Total number of traffic citations issued 17,000 16,991 12,848 ** Through September 2015 *No survey conducted in 2014 DR A F T 130 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Police protection 8,740,113$ 9,005,972$ 9,624,937$ 9,514,385$ 10,172,961$ 10,542,555$ Community health 431,735 508,764 588,290 544,030 571,535 589,513 Legal services 260,568 283,519 296,000 299,000 301,050 306,300 General fund subtotal 9,432,416 9,798,255 10,509,227 10,357,415 11,045,546 11,438,368 Other Funds Police special revenue 96,775 215,451 328,000 61,000 174,000 113,000 Construction (equipment) 374,634 592,875 905,000 905,000 732,650 272,410 Recycling 460,602 475,136 491,133 441,408 496,970 507,724 Department Total Budget 10,364,427$ 11,081,717$ 12,233,360$ 11,764,823$ 12,449,166$ 12,331,502$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Police Department Expenditures Police protection 91% Community health 9% Expenditures by Service Area DR A F T 131 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT Patrol Division DIVISION OVERVIEW In 2014 the Edina Police Department made approximately 19,838 contacts with the public through traffic statute violations and “Focus-In” contacts, along with responding to 40,789 calls for service. Each and every contact is a significant interaction with the public. The criminal deterrent value of the interactions is not measurable, but every contact is a significant step towards crime prevention, public safety and cultivating positive community relations. The Division consists of 28 full-time employees (FTEs), including 1 lieutenant, 4 sergeants, 21 patrol officers, and 2 K-9 Handlers. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Arresting violators who drive under the influence of drugs and alcohol is one of the foremost enforcement objectives for the Edina Police Department. In 2014, 189 people were arrested for DWI. In 2015, the Edina Police Department added an additional officer specifically assigned to target impaired drivers through a grant from the MN Office of Traffic Safety. This additional officer will further our efforts to keep the public safe from impaired drivers. DR A F T 132 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT— PATROL DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Advance and continue to develop the training curriculum for new supervisors and Officers-In-Charge. Expand the “Focus-In” campaign by increasing the quantity of contacts and awareness. Continue cooperative efforts with private/business partners (malls, clinics and hospitals) in learning the Southwest Hennepin Regional Response Plan and procedures. Increase proactive enforcement efforts in traffic statute/ordinance violations and DWI arrests. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Organized and hosted the U.S. Police Canine Association National Detector Dog Trials. Purchased and installed two automatic license plate reader systems. Successfully trained all personnel in the Southwest Hennepin Regional Response to Mass Casualty/Active Shooter. We had an 11% increase from 2013 in enforcement of statute and ordinance violations and a 14% increase in over- all arrests with a .9% increase in DWI arrests. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Number of traffic and misdemeanor citable violations 17,954 18,733 13,621 Average response time for top priority calls (in minutes) 4.75 5.57 5.41 Number of DWI arrests 182 189 241 Number of K-9 cases or assists** NA 122 47 **Data reflects one K-9 January through June 2014 *Through September 2015 DR A F T 133 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT Investigations Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The Edina Police Department’s Investigations Division has 11 FTEs who investigate a wide variety of crimes, including thefts, burglaries and assaults. Detectives prepare and execute search warrants, recover stolen property, collect evi- dence and conduct background investigations. The Division also includes School Resource Officers, a Drug Task Force Detective, and a part-time Community Service Officer. In 2014, a total of 420 cases were assigned to the Division for investigation. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Reports of child abuse to our department will increase because of the rules requiring cross-reporting from Child Protective Services. In 2014, the most residential burglaries occurred in June (11), July (12), and October (12). The least were in February (2). DR A F T 134 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT— INVESTIGATIONS DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Expand division by one FTE to accommodate the need for computer forensics directly related to increased use of technology in criminal activity. Research and possibly implement a “detective in squad cars” program. The goal is to have a detective in uniform in a squad once per month to stay current with technology, trends on the street and remain acquainted with the complexities of being a patrol officer. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Detectives utilized the department’s Computer Forensic Examiner on many cases. This position is currently split with regular police duties, but is becoming increasingly necessary and time consuming. Fully implemented Pro-Case. The detectives are now able to submit a felony case to Hennepin County, streamlin- ing the charging process. Partnered with the Edina Project Coordinator to facilitate outreach and communication with neighborhood groups. Successfully completed over 13 years with the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. Our detectives were instru- mental in many federal cases, arrests and convictions. PERFORMANCE MEASURE 2013 2014 2015* Clearance Rates for Part I and Part II crimes 52% 50% 61% *Through September 2015 DR A F T 135 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT Administrative Division DIVISION OVERVIEW During 2014 and 2015, the Edina Police Department combined several police services under the umbrella of a restruc- tured Administrative Division. The Administrative Division consists of the following 27 full-time employees: Lieuten- ant, (2) Sergeants, (7) Officers, Dispatch Supervisor, (9) 911 Dispatchers, Animal Control Officer, Crime Prevention Coordinator, (5) Records Management and Administrative Support personnel. There are also five part-time 911 dis- patchers, five part-time Community Service Officers, and twenty-four volunteer Police Reserve Officers. The division is also responsible for coordinating special events, acquisition of equipment and the Police Explorer program. Edina’s 911 Communications Center provides Police, Fire, and EMS dispatch services for both Edina and the City of Richfield. The highly trained dispatch staff handles thousands of calls for service annually, directly providing an excep- tional level of emergency and non-emergency assistance and customer service to community members. The Administrative Support staff is responsible for numerous behind the scenes functions in the department including: records management, property and evidence management, finance, false alarm billing, data privacy and public infor- mation requests, specialized support to investigators and prosecutors for processing of criminal cases. They also re- spond to customer service requests to courts, partner agencies, city staff, and members of the community. The department’s Flex Team includes three traffic enforcement officers, a DWI enforcement officer and a training of- ficer. The DWI enforcement officer position began in 2015 and is fully funded by a grant from the State of Minnesota. Two plain clothes retail crime investigators, based at a substation located inside of Southdale Center, focus on retail and commercial crimes. A full-time training officer manages continuing education training for all employees of the de- partment as well as mandated training for officers according to the Minnesota Peace Officer Standards and Training. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 136 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT— ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Continue to integrate the Administrative Division into the Department. Continue to develop new officer candidates through our Community Service Officer and Reserve Officer pro- grams. Coordinate police bike and business patrols to most effectively address safety concerns and crime trends in a pro- active manner. Increase the property room clearance rate. Implement alarm registration program to improve database accuracy and ensure successful collection efforts. Purchase and install dispatch radio consoles. Evaluate and refine crime analyst and crime prevention functions. Add fourth workstation console in dispatch center to accommodate increased call load and staffing levels. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed the bike hub, allowing for a more efficient and effective method of deployment. Developed a new pay structure for off-duty officer work. Partnered with the Communications Department to improve bike and pedestrian safety messaging. Increased Summer Bike and Foot Patrol Shifts. Implemented online crime mapping service to prevent and control crime and inform citizens. Completed implementation of shared 911 call handling system with regional partners. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Total number of animal impounds 52 39 57 Number of Summer Bike Patrol Shifts 30 27 35 Number of Summer Foot Patrol Shifts 14 22 28 Total number of 911 and non-emergency calls processed 79,324 111,425 82,929 Total number of solicitor permits/registrations 201 90 31 Rate of false alarm fee collection 88% 88% 85% Total number of gun permit to purchase applications processed 371 200 155 *Through September 2015 DR A F T 137 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT Community Health Division DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DIVISION OVERVIEW The Community Health Division, through a delegation agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health, is re- sponsible for the licensing and inspection of food and beverage establishments, lodging facilities, temporary food events and public swimming pools in the City. These include restaurants, schools, daycares, hotels, apartment complex pools, the Aquatic Center and food vendors at various events. The Community Health Division performs plan reviews for new facilities, investigates foodborne illness complaints, reports waterborne illnesses and responds to disasters such as fires for wastewater backups in regulated facilities. Public health nuisance complaint investigations, property maintenance inspections and code enforcement activities are also conducted by the Division. These activities range from simple maintenance issues to calls from Police or Fire to order abatement of extreme public health nuisance conditions in a property. An intern is hired each summer to assist with code enforcement activities and gain exposure to public and environmental health regulation. The Division manages four grants from the Minnesota Department of Health to the Edina Community Health Board which funds contracts with Bloomington Public Health for public health activities in Edina. The Community Health Ad- ministrator manages the grants and acts as the liaison to the Community Health Commission. In addition, the Division is responsible for oversight and education for the residential recycling collection program which provides service to over 14,000 residential households. The Division also manages some programs created by local ordinance, including regulation of body art, massage facilities and noise complaints. DR A F T 138 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT— Community Health Division 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Along with other City divisions, implement electronic plan review process to provide streamlined service to new/ remodeling establishments. Update licensing terminology and definitions to be consistent with Minnesota Statutes and ensure proper licensure of facilities in Edina. Participate in implementation of new electronic licensing software from LOGIS. Become an accredited health department as part of the Public Health Alliance of Bloomington, Edina and Richfield (PHABER). Update Division webpages to include additional multi-lingual educational information for licenses. Continue expanded use of electronic media to communicate with licensees and the public. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed standardization of Environmental Health Specialist by the Minnesota Department of Health. Participated in the development of electronic plan review software. Developed guidance document for PHABER as part of initiating accreditation process by the Public Health Accredi- tation Board (PHAB). Increased frequency of inspections of regulated facilities, including development of frequency tracking system to keep all staff informed and on schedule. Interns from past two summers obtained positions in environmental health related fields after completing intern- ships with the Division PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Total number of public nuisance complaints investigated 150 248 167 Total number of new licensed establishments 15 5 7 Total number of food, pool and lodging inspections 320 255 297 *Through September 2015 DR A F T 139 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA IRE DEPARTMENT Tom Schmitz, Fire Chief tschmitz@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0332 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The mission of the Edina Fire Department is to serve the community by protecting lives, property and the environment in a safe, efficient and professional manner. The Department works together to ensure the safety of the City's residents through the implementation of building and fire codes for new constructions, to fire extinguishment and EMS response. The City of Edina is also responsible for the management of the South Metro Public Training Facility (SMPTF). SMPTF is a joint project of the Cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie and Edina and the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport Police Department. The SMPTF provides high quality, cost effective training and development for public safety organizations through shared resources to ensure premier public safety services to our communities. The facility provides a variety of police and fire training opportunities in a 28,000-square-foot, two-building campus on a 3.5 acre site. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Building Inspections Emergency Medical Emergency Management Fire Suppression & Prevention Special Operations Management of the South Metro Public Training Facility DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 140 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT 2016-2017 DEPARTMENT GOALS Complete replacement of all emergency response radio communications systems within the Fire Department. Conduct emergency management training for key leadership staff throughout the City. Transition all plan reviews to electronic format. 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Discussed Community EMT pilot program with Fairview Southdale Hospital. Upgraded all ambulances with PowerCot loading system. Purchased and began training and implementation of electronic plan review throughout key departments within the City PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Total calls for Fire Department response 4700 4914 3500 Number of ambulance calls 3629 3826 2631 Fire incidents – structure and non-structure 66 68 65 Number of false fire alarms 292 285 272 Number of all other calls for assistance 713 735 532 Number of public education events 182 177 183 Property dollar loss from fires $1,214,700 $612,613 $635,500 Dollar value of building permits issued $84,981 $88,404 $67,791 *Through August 2015 DR A F T 141 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Fire & rescue 5,259,332$ 5,286,346$ 5,562,376$ 5,550,776$ 5,727,930$ 5,946,650$ Building inspections 1,322,461 1,377,591 1,664,957 1,456,622 1,729,323 1,800,156 General fund subtotal 6,581,793 6,663,937 7,227,333 7,007,398 7,457,253 7,746,806 Other Funds Construction 103,826 301,350 86,549 86,549 695,000 187,000 Energy Efficiency - - 41,000 41,000 - - Department Total Budge 6,685,619$ 6,965,287$ 7,354,882$ 7,134,947$ 8,152,253$ 7,933,806$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Fire Department Expenditures Fire & rescue 78% Building inspections 22% Expenditures by Division and/or Service Area DR A F T 142 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT Building Inspections Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The Building Inspections Division is responsible for plan review, permitting and inspection of all new construction within the City to ensure that new buildings meet both structural and exiting safety standards. The City of Edina adopts the Minnesota State Building Code, which in turn adopts the International Building Code, International Residential Code and other codes and standards relating to building inspections. The Division includes 14 full-time staff members. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 143 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Develop a policy for Building Division response to post disasters. Install eCodes on all inspectors infield tablets. Create definitions and standards for the measurement of wait times for customers. All commercial and residential plan reviews are submitted and reviewed electronically. FIRE DEPARTMENT— BUILDING INSPECTIONS DIVISION 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Restructured and added to additional staff to meet the demands of the community. Purchased necessary hardware and software to implement electronic plan review and conducted training with all participating City Staff. Implemented infield photo inspection procedures to meet increased demands following August 2013 hail storm. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Number of inspections 18,000 19,869 12,564 Average number days from initial permit application to final approval 221 107 TBD Number of occupancies inspected 99 103 63 Median time it takes to process a new single dwelling plan (in days) 25 34 28 *Through August 2015 DR A F T 144 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT— BUILDING INSPECTIONS DIVISION 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 1,085,852$ 1,143,148$ 1,377,313$ 1,189,898$ 1,410,155$ 1,469,994$ Contractual services 107,286 112,120 145,920 129,000 156,700 165,250 Commodities 18,563 14,264 25,000 21,000 24,000 24,500 Central services 110,760 108,059 116,724 116,724 138,468 140,412 General fund subtotal 1,322,461 1,377,591 1,664,957 1,456,622 1,729,323 1,800,156 Other Funds Equipment replacement - - 40,000 40,000 - 60,000 Department Total Budge 1,322,461$ 1,377,591$ 1,704,957$ 1,496,622$ 1,729,323$ 1,860,156$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Building Inspections Expenditures Personal services 81% Contractual services 9% Commodities 1% Central services 8%Equipment replacement 1% Inspections Expenditures by Type DR A F T 145 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire and Emergency Medical Services Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The Fire and Emergency Medical Services Division is responsible for extinguishing fires, providing paramedic and ad- vanced life support medical service, special operations, educating the community on fire prevention issues and main- taining firefighting equipment and fire department facilities. In addition, the Division enforces laws and ordinances per- taining to fire safety. The Division currently operates two fire stations with 31 full-time fire personnel, 14 paid-on-call firefighters, and two administrative staff. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 146 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT— FIRE AND RESCUE DIVISION 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Continue three-year CAD computer replacement schedule. Implement CAD carry-over software for dispatch CAD to RMS. Provide follow-ups for 80% of reported false alarms. Conduct 250 commercial life-safety inspections. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Upgraded tablets and software for electronic patient care reports on ambulance calls. Acquired powered cot loading system for ambulances. Developed "cloud based" documentation of fire inspection activities. Presented fire prevention program to all Edina pre-school, kindergarten and 1st grade students annually. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Actual annual operating cost per household** $251.39 $251.42 $269.06 Fire response time 4:62 4:70 4:77 Ambulance response time 3:90 4:65 4:69 Percentage of patients that utilize Medicare or Medicaid 65% 54% 55% Ambulance net revenues $1,839,569 $1,902,085 $1,065,276 * Through August 2015 ** Using Met Council housing data DR A F T 147 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FIRE DEPARTMENT— FIRE AND RESCUE DIVISION 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 4,258,088$ 4,345,128$ 4,584,216$ 4,584,216$ 4,709,618$ 4,886,126$ Contractual services 378,423 387,325 387,600 386,600 398,600 418,500 Commodities 277,052 187,055 202,000 191,400 209,900 225,600 Central services 345,769 366,838 388,560 388,560 409,812 416,424 General fund subtotal 5,259,332 5,286,346 5,562,376 5,550,776 5,727,930 5,946,650 Other Funds Equipment replacement 103,826 72,236 18,000 18,000 395,000 127,000 Construction - 229,114 28,549 28,549 300,000 - Energy Efficiency - - 41,000 41,000 - - Department Total Budge 5,363,158$ 5,587,696$ 5,649,925$ 5,638,325$ 6,422,930$ 6,073,650$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Fire & Rescue Expenditures Personal services 79% Contractual services 7% Commodities 4% Central services 6% Equipment replacement 2% Construction 2% Energy Efficiency 0% Fire & Rescue Expenditures by Type DR A F T 148 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ann Kattreh, Director akattreh@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0431 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for administering and maintaining the entire parks system. This includes 40 parks that total 1,553 acres of property including park enterprise facilities. The department coordinates adaptive recreation, adult and youth recreation, and works with 14 athletic associations, the Edina Garden Council, the Edina Historical Society and the Edina Museum. The Parks Department acts as staff liaison to the Park Board, which advises the City Council on parks and recreation issues. Staff consists of 33 full-time employees and approximately 362 part-time seasonal staff, including playground leaders, ice rink attendants, arts and craft specialists, concession employees, sports instructors, recreation supervisors, administrative staff and maintenance personnel. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Recreation programs Park Design Art Center Special Events Aquatic Center Braemar Arena Braemar Golf Centennial Lakes Park Edinborough Park Strategic Planning Project Management DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 149 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2016-2017 DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Complete a Master Plan for Fred Richards Park. Prioritize capital improvement projects based on strategic plan. Provide enhanced and consistent service to all athletic associations through greater contact with association boards, resulting in increased accountability from athletic association boards regarding financial data, residency per- centages, insurance information, etc. Develop cost of service analysis to evaluate programs and determine resident needs. Develop Business Plans for Enterprise Facilities including cost recovery goals. Complete a Grandview site feasibility study. Design and implement new park signage and wayfinding. 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed construction of the Sports Dome and Refrigerated Outdoor Rink. Completed new shelter building and other park improvements at Pamela Park, including new trails, athletic fields and parking lot expansions. Completed Master Plan for Braemar Golf Course. Completed Vision Master Plan at Fred Richards. Completed GIS Inventory Completed Needs Assessment Survey Completed construction of a new driving range and par 3 course at Braemar Golf Course. Completed strategic plan of Edina park system. Completed renovations to Braemar Clubhouse and opened a year-round Tin Fish restaurant on site. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Keep 50-60% of all recreation programs in the introductory, takeoff, or growth lifecycle stage in order to align with trends and help meet the evolving needs of the community. NA NA TBD Percentage of residents who, from their experience, rate the quality of parks as “excellent” or “good”. 99% NA 94% Percentage of residents who, from their experience, rate the recreation programs and classes “Good” or “Excellent”. 99% NA 85% DR A F T 150 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Administration 864,255$ 897,037$ 959,585$ 956,414$ 952,714$ 1,167,593$ Recreation 358,947 386,555 420,711 431,673 422,208 429,913 General fund subtotal 1,223,202 1,283,592 1,380,296 1,388,087 1,374,922 1,597,506 Other Funds Braemar Memorial - 32,000 240,000 240,000 - - Arts & Culture - 16,328 22,425 22,907 22,425 22,450 Construction 1,928,589 2,267,135 525,000 852,178 323,100 205,000 Environmental Efficiency - 4,358 150,915 150,915 - 71,295 Aquatic Center 822,932 827,485 944,425 938,625 918,406 938,173 Art Center 607,649 654,310 640,838 683,306 684,447 709,507 Golf Course 3,199,815 3,342,493 2,895,230 3,358,756 3,202,114 2,023,015 Arena 2,272,510 2,375,173 2,631,024 2,423,956 2,610,691 2,654,073 Sports Dome - 10,879 555,230 554,090 721,441 736,043 Edinborough Park 1,415,094 1,340,243 1,593,347 1,616,747 1,622,702 1,671,496 Centennial Lakes 944,372 966,266 1,017,284 1,014,860 1,069,487 1,095,584 Total 12,414,163$ 13,120,262$ 12,596,014$ 13,244,427$ 12,549,735$ 11,724,142$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Parks and Recreation Department Expenditures & Expenses Administration 8%Recreation 4% Enterprise Facilities 88% Expenditures and Expenses by Service Area DR A F T 151 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Administration 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 719,118$ 708,062$ 760,973$ 760,973$ 761,978$ 793,969$ Contractual services 32,462 96,044 99,800 105,209 99,600 281,000 Commodities 23,478 18,157 18,400 9,820 20,300 20,300 Central Services 89,197 74,774 80,412 80,412 70,836 72,324 Total 864,255$ 897,037$ 959,585$ 956,414$ 952,714$ 1,167,593$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Park Administration Expenditures Personal services 78% Contractual services 12% Commodities 2%Central Services 8% Administration Expenditures by Type DR A F T 152 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Recreation 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 183,081$ 184,786$ 202,386$ 202,386$ 201,836$ 208,891$ Contractual services 126,314 141,062 154,925 170,230 154,422 154,522 Commodities 49,552 60,707 63,400 59,057 65,950 66,500 Total 358,947$ 386,555$ 420,711$ 431,673$ 422,208$ 429,913$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Recreation Expenditures Personal services 48% Contractual services 37% Commodities 15% Recreation Expenditures by Type DR A F T 153 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Art Center DIVISION OVERVIEW The Edina Art Center provides excellent educational programs for all ages in the visual arts. Located on the west side of Kenneth Rosland Park, it is a tranquil place for residents and visitors to view and purchase local and regional art- work, and a central location for creative energy, discussion, and ideas. The Edina Arts and Culture Commission was formed in May 2013 replacing the Art Center Board and advises City Council on artistic and cultural offerings in Edina. Art Center staff includes 2 FT, 8 PT and a roster of 51 highly trained instructors. The General Manager acts as staff liaison to the Commission and its working groups. The Art Center has historically run an annual operating loss that is subsidized by donations from the public and trans- fers from other City funds, primarily the Liquor and Constructions funds. Traditionally the Liquor fund supports opera- tions and the Construction fund supports building improvement projects. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART The Edina Art Center has experienced a 17% increase in the number of people participating in the Art Center programs since 2012. *Full-Time Staff DR A F T 154 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT— ART CENTER 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Expand partnerships and outreach efforts to build a vibrant community through the arts. Maintain 1,000 members monthly. Reorganize the Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studio for optimum efficiency in terms of profit and space. Improve the Art Center intern program. Implement MaxSolutions software to update and modernize registration and room scheduling. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Increased studio rental availability with discontinuation of media transfer services. Developed the Music in Edina and Summer Music in the Parks program with the Arts & Culture Commission. Developed partnerships with Edina Chorale, Morningside Women’s Group, Lion’s Club, Edina Community Foundation, Edina Community Center, and Fairview Southdale Hospital to expand Art Center programming. Increased number of summer camps registrants and memberships through LivingSocial and Groupon Marketing. Continued The Author’s Studio program with monthly conversational interviews with local and regional authors. Modernized registration and membership technology and increased use of social media marketing. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Operating revenue as a % of operating expenses 64% 71% 85% Annual number of class registrations 2,566 2,712 2,782 Annual number of memberships 941 956 998 Annual participants in non-class offerings 575 984 12,191** Number of outside events hosted by the Art Center 12 20 23 *Through September 2015 **Includes Fall into the Arts participants DR A F T 155 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—ART CENTER Cost of sales and services 1% Personal services 65% Contractual services 14% Commodities 10% Central services 6% Depreciation 4% Art Center Expenses by Type 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget Revenues Retail sales 37,677$ 42,403$ 40,000$ 37,000$ 40,000$ 40,000$ Concessions sales 442 209 350 500 350 350 Memberships 23,187 24,938 23,000 24,775 23,500 23,500 Class registration & other 405,715 413,332 398,254 383,675 389,500 389,500 Investment income 1,088 2,103 3,000 - 2,000 1,000 Donations 7,341 5,429 3,000 3,000 1,500 1,500 Revenues 475,450 488,414 467,604 448,950 456,850 455,850 Expenses Cost of sales and services 8,863 2,881 2,750 23,000 2,750 2,750 Personal services 396,222 434,583 427,160 449,431 439,729 456,631 Contractual services 84,864 89,221 77,818 101,175 106,350 107,950 Commodities 49,597 68,112 71,450 48,300 71,250 73,800 Central services 41,876 33,540 35,400 35,400 40,368 44,376 Depreciation 26,227 25,973 26,260 26,000 24,000 24,000 Expenses 607,649 654,310 640,838 683,306 684,447 709,507 Income (loss)(132,199) (165,896) (173,234) (234,356) (227,597) (253,657) Art Center Revenues and Expenses DR A F T 156 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Aquatic Center DIVISION OVERVIEW The Aquatic Center is a unique, high volume facility that accommodates swimmers of all ages and a wide range of activities, including recreational swimming, competitive swimming, lap swimming and swimming lessons. There are four separate bodies of water, including an eight lane, 50-meter lap pool with a diving well; a plunge pool; a zero-depth entry pool with a large play structure; and a FlowRider. The FlowRider was added in 2012 and is unique because it’s the only outdoor surf simulator in the state. Significant collaborative relationships have been developed with the Edina Swim Club and the Aquajets Swim Club. In 2014-2015, the Edina Swim Club was selected as the provider of the Learn to Swim program. New initiatives include implementing Birthday Party rental options, as well as expanding choices for a healthier concessions menu. The Aquatic Center is only open in the summer. The full-time staff consists of four positions with shared responsibili- ties. There are three FT employees (General Manager, Assistant Manager and Maintenance Coordinator) who have year-round responsibility for Edinborough Park and the Aquatic Center during the summer season. There is also one FT Certified Pool Operator who is dedicated to the Aquatic Center in the summer and also works in Park Maintenance the remainder of the year. The Aquatic Center hires approximately 85 seasonal staff, including lifeguards, concession, admissions and guest services employees. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART The Aquatic Center was voted “Best Outdoor Water Park in Edina” by the Sun Current and won the Readers’ Choice Award. *Full-Time Staff DR A F T 157 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—AQUATIC CENTER 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Increase FlowRider usage through social media awareness, group promotions and restructured pricing. Continue to focus on safety, staff training and customer service at the Center. Complete equipment replacements as scheduled in the capital improvement plan. Develop plan to modernize the look of the facility including the attractions, amenities, mechanical equipment and overall aesthetics. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Hosted the World’s Largest Swimming Lesson in 2013, 2014 and 2015 to raise awareness for swimming lessons and water safety, with nearly 500 participants each year. Continued a solid safety record with no major accidents or incidents. Awarded the 2014 “Silver International Aquatic Safety Award” by Jeff Ellis & Associates. Achieved 120% of General Admissions budgeted revenue and 95% of overall budgeted revenue in 2014. Completed zero-depth pool painting, 50 meter main pool painting, bath house roof replacement and bath house hot water heater replacements. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Operating revenue as a % of operating expenses 101% 112% 122% Number of season passes sold 3,308 3,354 3,257 Number of daily admission sold 39,693 34,648 39,310 Number of birthday parties booked 18 12 23 Percentage of residents who, from their experience, rate the quality of the Aquatic Center as “excellent” or “good”. 92% NA 91% *Through September 2015 DR A F T 158 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—AQUATIC CENTER 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget Revenues Retail sales 3,090$ 4,883$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 6,300$ 6,300$ Concessions sales 114,868 108,195 125,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 Memberships 398,626 399,218 412,500 515,000 408,475 428,899 Admissions 365,272 361,156 372,000 322,000 375,702 393,987 Building rental 46,199 44,960 48,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 Investment income 7,596 12,830 10,000 - 7,000 3,000 Other nonoperating revenue 765 - - - - - Total revenues 936,416 931,242 973,500 1,023,000 982,477 1,017,186 Expenses Cost of sales and services 42,376 31,873 44,000 46,000 42,000 42,000 Personal services 319,089 315,794 371,593 371,593 331,305 343,354 Contractual services 149,732 148,971 173,400 162,300 179,200 179,200 Commodities 49,211 56,649 86,350 89,650 89,150 89,150 Central services 19,904 25,857 27,108 27,108 33,228 37,956 Depreciation 233,946 241,671 236,500 236,500 241,500 246,500 Bond interest 8,674 6,670 5,474 5,474 2,023 13 Total expenses 822,932 827,485 944,425 938,625 918,406 938,173 Income 113,484 103,757 29,075 84,375 64,071 79,013 Aquatic Center Fund Financial Summary Cost of sales and services 5% Personal services 38% Contractual services 18% Commodities 9% Central services 3% Depreciation 27% Aquatic Center Expenses by Type DR A F T 159 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Braemar Arena DIVISION OVERVIEW Braemar Arena features three indoor and one outdoor, regulation-size ice sheets. Braemar is available for open skating, group rental, adult and youth hockey and figure skating programs. The facility also offers group skating lessons for ages 4 through adult and is home to the Braemar-City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, the Edina Hornets high school hockey teams and the Edina Hockey Association. In 2014, Braemar Arena added the Backyard Rink. This outdoor facility is one of the best outdoor hockey rinks in the State. Braemar Arena also recently completed the addition of the Hornets Nest. The Hornets Nest is home to the Edina High School hockey teams and provides a public-private partnership through 10,275 feet of off-ice training and 3,000 square feet of retail. Braemar Arena currently operates with 4.7 full-time employees. During our prime season, a typical high activity time will have one on-duty supervisor, three rink attendants and two concession stand employees. During open skating there is also an office staff person selling admissions and skate rentals. Besides the full-time employees, Braemar Arena has approximately 90 part-time employees. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART The Backyard Rink was added during the 2014-2015 season. The Backyard Rink is one of the best covered, outdoor rinks in the State. *Full-Time Staff DR A F T 160 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—BRAEMAR ARENA 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Expose new clientele to Braemar Arena by increasing programming and effectively utilizing new and existing spaces. Sell 95% of prime ice time. Develop thorough and proactive operations plan for staffing and maintaining new and existing facilities. Seek out energy saving opportunities to lower expenses and decrease the Arena’s carbon footprint. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Constructed Sports Dome and Outdoor Rink Sold 96% of prime ice time in 2014. Successfully hosted Midwestern and Pacific Synchronized Skating Event. Received over $20,000 in rebates for energy savings. Increased participation in classes that exceeded budgeted revenue. Successfully negotiated memorandum of understanding for facility use between Edina Hockey Association and Brae- mar-City of Lakes Figure Skating Club. Increased total facility revenue by 44% or $639,249 from 2012 to 2014. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Operating revenue as a % of operating expenses 91.5% 93.5% 74% Number of hours sold (excludes Arena programs) 8,183 8,298 5,470 Revenue from hours sold (excludes Arena programs) $1,397,096 $1,392,547 $651,237 Concessions stand revenues $225,858 $241,718 $160,078 Percentage of residents who, from their experience, rate the quali- ty of Braemar Arena as “excellent” or “good”. 88% NA 89% * Through June 2015 DR A F T 161 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—BRAEMAR ARENA 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget Revenues Retail sales 36,055$ 30,768$ 30,300$ 17,000$ 35,750$ 40,750$ Concessions sales 231,813 242,309 251,000 202,000 256,000 261,000 Memberships 2,120 2,010 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Admissions 103,289 103,935 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 Building rental 1,462,079 1,588,579 1,690,000 1,571,119 1,690,000 1,690,000 Rental of equipment 2,368 3,709 2,400 2,400 3,500 3,750 Class registration & other 105,247 120,375 115,000 110,000 125,000 130,000 Investment income (loss) 21 - - - 2,000 4,000 Other nonoperating revenue 17,984 882 - - - - Total revenues 1,960,976 2,092,567 2,198,700 2,017,519 2,232,250 2,254,500 Expenses Cost of sales and services 83,530 93,323 100,000 85,000 105,500 105,500 Personal services 741,639 748,750 936,181 885,513 871,133 905,311 Contractual services 688,457 746,959 742,400 612,750 729,950 729,950 Commodities 118,877 103,107 108,700 96,950 104,250 104,750 Central services 44,130 55,061 58,836 58,836 68,676 71,628 Depreciation 446,588 489,471 545,000 545,000 600,000 610,000 Bond interest & other 149,289 138,502 139,907 139,907 131,182 126,934 Total expenses 2,272,510 2,375,173 2,631,024 2,423,956 2,610,691 2,654,073 Income (loss)(311,534) (282,606) (432,324) (406,437) (378,441) (399,573) Arena Fund Financial Summary Cost of sales and services 4% Personal services 36% Contractual services30% Commodities 4% Central services 3% Depreciation 23% Arena Fund Expenses by Type DR A F T 162 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Braemar Golf Course DIVISION OVERVIEW Braemar Golf Course celebrated it’s 50th Anniversary in 2014. The original 18-hole golf course, the Castle and the Hays 9-hole courses, opened in 1964. The Clunie 9-hole course was added in 1994. Along with the 27 regulation holes, the Braemar facilities include an executive course, a driving range, a practice area, pro-shop, banquet room and golf dome. In July 2015, the driving range and executive course closed for renovation. The Braemar Executive Course was updated and converted into a Par 3 golf course. Larger greens and fewer forced carries will make the course much more playable for golfers of all ages and abilities. The driving was expanded and transformed into one of the premier practice and instructional facilities in Minnesota. The banquet facility was updated in 2014 with the addition of new lighting, carpet, restrooms and furniture and boasts one of the finest views in the area. In April 2015, the Tin Fish opened a year-round restaurant in the Braemar Clubhouse, further reinforcing Braemar as a community gathering destination for golfers and non-golfers alike. The Braemar Golf Dome offers golfers the opportunity to practice during the winter months. Group and private lessons for adults and juniors are offered by the PGA professional staff at the dome and outside at the driving range during the outdoor season. During peak season, the courses see roughly 725 golfers daily. Nearly 900 golfers play in one or more of Braemar’s many leagues. A Master Plan for the Braemar Golf Course will be finalized by the end of 2015 and renovations may occur early as the fall of 2016. The 500 acres of park land is carefully maintained by our grounds maintenance staff. The golf course has 8 FT employees with more than 100 seasonal employees. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 163 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Complete construction and grow in of the driving range expansion and Par 3 course project. Develop and market the new “Practice Facility” and golf course to maximize return on investment. Begin construction projects at Braemar Golf Course as identified in the approved regulation course master plan. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Opened rebuilt Golf Dome and enhanced the customer experience with new amenities. Implemented new customer database collection procedures. Outsourced food & beverage operation and completed construction of renovated restaurant space. Completed upgrades to the banquet facility that includes new lighting, carpet, restrooms and furniture. Implemented new tee time interval that drastically improved the pace of play. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Operating revenue as a % of operating expenses 85% 98% 115% Hours rented at banquet hall 921 952 750** Total number of rounds sold all courses 78,529 85,231 61,343** Buckets of balls sold at Driving Range 33,936 40,369 22,082** Percentage of residents who, from their experience, rate the quali- ty of Braemar Golf Course as “excellent” or “good”. 97% N/A 77% Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse welcomed the opening of the Tin Fish restaurant in 2015. The new restaurant will be an asset to the golf course and increase the efficiency of overall golf operations. * Through September 2015 ** Banquet hall was closed for the first quarter of 2015, driving range closed July 6, 2015 & Fred Richards Course was closed for all of 2015 DR A F T 164 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Cost of sales and services7% Personal services 42% Contractual services17% Commodities 10% Central services 5% Depreciation 18% Bond interest 1% Golf Fund Expenses by Type 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget Revenues Liquor sales 147,581$ 177,915$ 78,141$ 65,000$ -$ -$ Retail sales 210,814 202,339 224,934 260,400 227,046 40,376 Concessions sales 188,850 201,507 - 19,200 - - Memberships 80,437 61,280 87,357 100,000 88,230 8,823 Admissions 50,985 338,148 383,953 400,000 342,785 353,069 Building rental 63,982 65,511 110,879 122,025 114,205 100,788 Equipment rental 303,748 348,762 330,675 370,900 334,488 30,264 Greens fees 1,386,194 1,571,900 1,300,488 1,468,000 1,443,015 338,261 Other operating revenue 279,152 261,986 131,050 208,500 405,399 401,720 Investment income 4,585 4,155 5,000 - 8,000 9,000 Other nonoperating revenue 15,800 17,850 - - - - Total revenues 2,732,128 3,251,353 2,652,477 3,014,025 2,963,168 1,282,301 Expenses Cost of sales and services 286,581 299,949 208,514 225,200 185,599 37,120 Personal services 1,479,179 1,468,190 1,218,378 1,453,368 1,356,923 584,204 Contractual services 532,947 527,891 545,325 596,800 490,794 367,175 Commodities 343,421 378,257 294,615 380,800 313,990 104,085 Central services 147,845 123,729 132,588 132,588 130,404 139,392 Depreciation 390,743 502,528 495,810 570,000 640,000 710,000 Bond interest 19,099 41,949 - - 84,404 81,039 Total expenses 3,199,815 3,342,493 2,895,230 3,358,756 3,202,114 2,023,015 Income (loss)(467,687) (91,140) (242,753) (344,731) (238,946) (740,714) Golf Fund Financial Summary DR A F T 165 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Centennial Lakes Park DIVISION OVERVIEW Centennial Lakes Park provides a very unique social and recreational experience for Edina and the metropolitan area. The 24-acre site features more than 1.5 miles of paved pathways meandering around a 10-acre lake and boasts numer- ous amenities including an amphitheater, putting course, lawn games area, paddleboats, fishing, winter ice skating, ban- quet space, and a farmers market. The park and the adjacent Edina Promenade, also has a number of sculptures and works of public art for visitors to enjoy. Staffing at Centennial Lakes consists of a FT General Manager, Assistant Park Manager, 3 Maintenance Technicians, and 35 PT seasonal staffing for Concessions, Horticulture and Maintenance. Centennial Lakes has historically run an annual operating loss that is subsidized by the Centennial Lakes dedication fund. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Centennial Lakes boasts the largest groomed ice skating rink in the United States. *Full-Time Staff DR A F T 166 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Expand social media usage to increase attendance at events. Implement MaxGalaxy system for point of sale and reservations. Implement Cityworks, a public asset management software to assist with work order tracking. Renovate putting course ponds. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Increased paddleboat rental revenue by 29%. Increased EBT use at Farmers Market by over 300% from 2013 to 2014. The 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 ice skating seasons were the two highest revenue producing seasons in the history of Centennial Lakes Park. Lowered lake level and removed organic debris to improve water quality and aesthetics. Completed the construction of Phase 4 of the Edina Promenade. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Operating revenue as a % of operating expenses 78% 79% 99% Number of facility rentals 200 216 204 Number of putting course rounds 21,370 23,098 23,164 Number of Paddleboat Rentals 6,015 7,727 7,052 Percentage of residents who, from their experience, rate the quality of Centennial Lakes Park as “excellent” or “good”. 100% NA 95% *Through September 2015 DR A F T 167 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget Revenues Concessions sales 32,398$ 26,924$ 34,000$ 34,000$ 34,000$ 34,000$ Building rental 102,142 111,184 115,500 114,000 116,000 116,000 Equipment rental 144,654 145,385 145,000 128,000 143,000 145,000 Greens fees 182,125 196,147 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 Association fees and other 274,237 279,253 280,000 305,000 280,000 284,000 Investment income (loss) (51,564) 9,858 6,000 25,000 4,000 3,000 Other nonoperating revenue 765 7,771 - - - - Total revenues 684,757 776,522 785,500 811,000 782,000 787,000 Expenses Cost of sales and services 13,081 10,241 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Personal services 569,029 560,057 623,407 623,683 635,066 661,099 Contractual services 173,218 173,900 180,825 177,625 183,925 183,925 Commodities 98,576 134,148 107,800 108,300 135,800 123,800 Central services 54,120 48,112 51,252 51,252 60,696 70,260 Depreciation 36,348 39,808 40,000 40,000 40,000 42,500 Total expenses 944,372 966,266 1,017,284 1,014,860 1,069,487 1,095,584 Income (loss)(259,615) (189,744) (231,784) (203,860) (287,487) (308,584) Centennial Lakes Fund Financial Summary Cost of sales and services 1% Personal services 60% Contractual services 18% Commodities 12% Central services 5% Depreciation 4% Centennial Average Expenses by Type DR A F T 168 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Edinborough Park DIVISION OVERVIEW Edinborough Park is Minnesota’s unique indoor public park. The enclosed, one-acre park includes a swimming pool, a running track and fitness equipment, multi-purpose activity area, 250-seat amphitheater, a renovated Grotto, and Adventure Peak. One of the most unique features of the park is Adventure Peak, which is the largest and tallest indoor play structure in the region. Each week during the school year, there is free entertainment consisting of music, dance, theater and visual arts programs that attract children, parents and grandparents. Edinborough Park has six full-time employees, including the General Manager, Assistant Manager, and Maintenance Coordinator that have shared responsibilities with the Aquatic Center, and 3 FT Maintenance Coordinators dedicated solely to Edinborough Park. The PT staff consists of 15 guest services staff, 10 concessions staff, three maintenance staff and one birthday party coordinator. Revenue is generated by season passes, daily admissions, birthday parties, facility rentals and association fees charged to neighboring residents and businesses. Although Edinborough Park has historically run an operating loss that is subsidized out of the Edinborough Park dedication fund, in 2013 Edinborough Park finished in a positive financial position. In 2014, 98% of all costs were recovered. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART Edinborough Park conducted a feasibility study in 2012 that prompted several physical and operational changes. Those changes are directly related to the improved cost recovery efforts. In 2013, Edinborough Park finished in a positive financial position and in 2014, 99% of costs were recovered. *Full-Time Staff DR A F T 169 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—EDINBOROUGH PARK 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Increase concession revenue by evaluating concession products, pricing and food package promotions. Work collaboratively with association partners to strengthen relationships and renew maintenance agreements. Increase usage of the amphitheater and generate new revenue with additional programming. Complete equipment replacements as scheduled in the capital improvement plan. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed installation of the ultraviolet filtration system which was donated by the Edina Swim Club. Completed LED lighting retrofit that resulted in savings of $32,000 in 2014. Season tickets, general admissions and birthday parties each achieved 105% of the budgeted revenue in 2014. Completed lower level renovations in Adventure Peak and the installation of a new triple wave slide. The slide is the tallest and longest open fiberglass triple slide in the upper Midwest. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Operating revenue as a % of operating expenses 101% 99% 100% Number of daily admissions sold 127,705 129,321 125,485 Number of birthday parties 1029 1105 803 Percentage of residents who, from their experience, rate the quality of Edinborough Park as “excellent” or “good”. 94% NA 88% *Through September 2015 DR A F T 170 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—EDINBOROUGH PARK 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget Revenues Concessions sales 138,370$ 118,850$ 128,000$ 175,000$ 130,000$ 130,000$ Memberships 64,515 63,190 60,000 60,000 65,000 65,000 Admissions 755,241 684,881 685,000 665,000 685,000 695,000 Building rental 233,055 227,558 164,000 164,000 226,000 226,000 Equipment rental 12,312 10,951 9,800 9,800 10,800 10,800 Association fees and other 219,563 220,178 292,000 281,000 234,000 236,000 Investment income (loss) (55,650) 22,065 15,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 Other nonoperating revenues - 60,876 - - - - Total revenues 1,367,406 1,408,549 1,353,800 1,369,800 1,364,800 1,375,800 Expenses Cost of sales and services 80,981 65,464 90,000 105,000 85,000 85,000 Personal services 649,978 640,110 745,581 745,581 774,962 807,256 Contractual services 328,538 299,975 356,750 362,650 352,250 351,750 Commodities 134,824 116,404 180,950 183,450 169,800 169,800 Central services 59,660 49,558 53,316 53,316 68,940 80,940 Depreciation 161,113 168,732 166,750 166,750 171,750 176,750 Total expenses 1,415,094 1,340,243 1,593,347 1,616,747 1,622,702 1,671,496 Income (loss)(47,688) 68,306 (239,547) (246,947) (257,902) (295,696) Edinborough Fund Financial Summary Cost of sales and services 6% Personal services 47%Contractual services 22% Commodities 10% Central services 4%Depreciation 11% Edinborough Average Expenses by Type DR A F T 171 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Braemar Field DIVISION OVERVIEW Braemar Field is a 250 x 400 foot turf field that is covered seasonally by a dome. The facility also includes an accessory building and storage facility for the dome components during the offseason. Braemar Field is located to the north of Braemar Arena and is operated by Braemar Arena staff. Braemar Field was approved by the Edina City Council based in part on a formal agreement that states the Edina Baseball Association, Edina Football Association, Edina Lacrosse Association and Edina Soccer Club all commit to a set schedule of usage and hours purchased. There is also a $30 per participant facility use fee to supplement revenues in order to recover 100% of operating costs and provide for a fund to pay for the replacement of turf and dome fabric when needed. During the dome season which runs from November to April, a part-time employee supervises he facility from the dome accessory building. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART The facility was named Braemar Field instead of Sports Dome to avoid confusion with the Golf Dome. Shift Supervisors Field Staff DR A F T 172 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT—BRAEMAR FIELD 2016-2017 DIVISION GOALS Meet revenue goals identified in pre-construction proformas. Sell 95% of prime Field time. Develop thorough and proactive operations plan for maintaining new and existing facilities. Seek out energy saving opportunities to lower operational expenses and decrease our carbon footprint. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Constructed Sports Dome and Outdoor Rink. Opened 4 days after target facility opening date. Completed the construction process within budget. Received $250,000 Hennepin County Sports Grant to assist with construction costs. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013* 2014* 2015 Sell at least 95% of prime time - - Yes Meet all budget goals for programming - - Yes Promote family time on Saturday nights to achieve 125 average guest attendances through season - - No *Braemar Field did not open until December of 2014 DR A F T 173 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT— BRAEMAR FIELD 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget Revenues Concessions sales -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 1,000$ Admissions - 84 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Building rental - 17,380 385,310 375,860 390,310 395,310 Class registration & other 410 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,500 Investment income (loss)- - 1,000 - 3,000 5,000 Other nonoperating revenue - - - - - - Total revenues - 17,874 392,310 381,860 399,310 406,810 Expenses Personal services - 7,829 55,023 54,440 58,272 60,424 Contractual services - 605 171,930 171,650 148,180 149,930 Commodities - 2,445 3,277 3,000 3,277 3,725 Central services - - - - 11,712 11,964 Depreciation - - 325,000 325,000 500,000 510,000 Total expenses - 10,879 555,230 554,090 721,441 736,043 Income (loss)- 6,995 (162,920) (172,230) (322,131) (329,233) Sports Dome Fund Financial Summary Personal services 9% Contractual services 25% Commodities 1% Central services 1% Depreciation 64% Sports Dome Average Expenses by Type DR A F T 174 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA C OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Cary Teague, Director cteague@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0460 DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW The mission of the Edina Community Development Department is to promote the health, safety and welfare of our residents, neighborhoods, and districts and to preserve our historic and natural resources in an efficient and effective manner through orderly land use and development. The Community Development Department is responsible for plan- ning and zoning, housing and redevelopment, and is responsible for estimating the market value and determining the classification of each piece of property in the City of Edina for property tax purposes. MAJOR SERVICE AREAS Planning Zoning Heritage Preservation Residential Appraisal Sign Permits Residential redevelopment Commercial Appraisal DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATIONAL CHART In 2015, the Community Development Department completed the Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan. DR A F T 175 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Number of processed applications and plans reviewed 500 620 300* Number of residential property inspections 3,800 3,729 2,960* Number of Special Assessments levied 17 15 12 2015-2016 DEPARTMENTAL GOALS Continue to monitor, improve and explore ways to minimize impacts regarding residential redevelopment. Complete Study of the density/traffic/utilities issue in the Southdale area. Begin the 2018 Comprehensive Plan process by the end of 2016. Value all taxable parcels annually and meet the minimum target sales ratio, as required by the County Assessor. Participate in the implementation and training for the new Assessment and Taxes program with Hennepin County. 2014-2015 DEPARTMENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS The Planning Division applied for and received a Livable Communities Grant through the Metropolitan Council to provide $500,000 for contamination cleanup grants at Pentagon Park. Completed the Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan. Completed several Zoning Ordinance Amendments to better regulate residential redevelopment. Amended the Comprehensive Plan to better align development density with Metropolitan Council goals. Completed a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to make the rezoning process more efficient. Created an affordable housing policy with the Edina Housing Foundation. Helped guide development proposals in the Southdale Area that will create 799 new housing units, 150,000 s.f. of new medical office, and 60,000 s.f. of new retail space in the area. *Through June 2015 DR A F T 176 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Planning 604,437$ 675,179$ 675,415$ 679,087$ 721,097$ 847,443$ Assessing 840,036 834,781 925,013 933,073 925,848 962,534 General fund subtotal 1,444,473 1,509,960 1,600,428 1,612,160 1,646,945 1,809,977 Other Funds Community Development Block Grant 193,340 18,700 125,000 100,000 125,000 125,000 Construction - 14,826 30,000 30,000 - 200,000 Department Total Budget 1,637,813$ 1,543,486$ 1,755,428$ 1,742,160$ 1,771,945$ 2,134,977$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Community Development Department Expenditures Planning 48%Assessing 52% Expenditures by Division DR A F T 177 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Assessing Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The Assessing Division conducts quintile field inspections (Minnesota Statute 273.08) and performs annual classification and valuation of Edina’s 21,311 real estate parcels. In addition, once every six years, the division must appraise all exempt properties. Accepted approaches (cost, market comparison and income approach) to property valuation are considered in the appraisal process. Each year, all tangible changes to property that may affect value are physically inspected using building permits as an informational source. Statistical analysis is performed on more than 450 residential sales and existing assessor’s market values each year, forming a basis for annual adjustments to value. Sales and the analysis of available income and expense data help determine adjustments to commercial, industrial, and apartment values. The division’s work culminates each year with the Board of Appeal & Equalization. Hundreds of inquiries and reviews are handled each year prior to that meeting. Throughout the year, staff also manages appeals on commercial/industrial and apartment properties in Minnesota Tax Court. Hennepin County municipalities compare, coordinate and discuss ratios of assessor’s values to sale prices to ensure an acceptable level of assessment and equity between jurisdictions. These ratios indicate the quality of our assessment and are monitored and corrected (if necessary) by the Department of Revenue. The Assessing Division is also responsible for certification and collection of special assessments. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART DR A F T 178 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2015-2016 DIVISION GOALS Physically inspect and revalue 20 percent of all real property, as required by statute. Value all taxable parcels annually and meet the minimum target sales ratio, as required by the County Assessor. Appraise all tax exempt properties for the 2016 assessment. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed the 2015 assessment with a median sales ratio of 95.5 percent and a coefficient of dispersion of 5.3 percent. Physically inspected and revalued 20 percent of all real property, as required by statute. Valued all taxable parcels annually and met the minimum target sales ratio, as required by the County Assessor. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 Appraisal value to actual sales value ratio 95.8 97.3 95.5 Board of Appeal and Equalization cases heard 6 16 14 Minnesota Tax Court petitions filed 65 73 71 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—ASSESSING DIVISION DR A F T 179 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—ASSESSING DIVISION 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 680,933$ 665,221$ 746,389$ 738,949$ 727,940$ 758,738$ Contractual services 89,008 101,007 103,920 118,720 125,700 130,700 Commodities 1,264 1,526 2,200 2,900 2,200 2,200 Central Services 68,831 67,027 72,504 72,504 70,008 70,896 Construction Fund Equipment replacement - 14,826 30,000 30,000 - - Total 840,036$ 849,607$ 955,013$ 963,073$ 925,848$ 962,534$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Assessing Division Expenditures Personal services 79% Contractual services 12% Commodities 1%Central Services 8% Expenditures by Type DR A F T 180 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division DIVISION OVERVIEW The Planning Division is primarily responsible for the review and management of development and redevelopment in the City of Edina. The division coordinates the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan, including the City's long-range guide to how property should be developed or redeveloped. Within the context of the Comprehensive Plan, the division administers the City's zoning ordinances, which govern how property can be used. Planning staff provides recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council on all land use issues. The Planning Division also acts as the staff liaison to the Edina Heritage Preservation Board and the Edina Housing Foundation. In a typical year, the Planning Division will process 50 variance requests; submit to the City Council between 20 and 30 requests for subdivision, rezoning, site plan and conditional use permit approval; process 100 sign permits and adminis- ter $150,000 in Community Development Block Grant funding. DIVISION ORGANIZATIONAL CHART The Planning Division helped guide development proposals in the Southdale Area that will create 799 new housing units, 150,000 s.f. of new medical office, and 60,000 s.f. of new retail space in the area. DR A F T 181 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2015-2016 DIVISION GOALS Continue to monitor, improve and explore ways to minimize impacts regarding residential redevelopment. Complete Study of the density/traffic/utilities issue in the Southdale area. Begin the 2018 Comprehensive Plan creation process the end of 2016. 2014-2015 DIVISION ACCOMPLISHMENTS Completed the Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan. Completed several Zoning Ordinance Amendments to better regulate residential redevelopment. Amended the Comprehensive Plan to better align development density with Metropolitan Council goals. Completed a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to make the rezoning process more efficient. Created an affordable housing policy with the Edina Housing Foundation. Helped guide development proposals in the Southdale Area that will create 799 new housing units, 150,000 s.f. of new medical office, and 60,000 s.f. of new retail space in the area. PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2013 2014 2015* Number of Conditional Use Permits submitted 3 5 1 Number of New Home permits reviewed 106 117 65 Number of Sign Permits submitted 157 102 50 Number of Sketch Plans submitted 5 10 4 Number of Variance applications submitted 23 27 18 Number of Subdivision applications submitted 7 2 3 Number of Rezoning applications submitted 3 10 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT—PLANNING DIVISION *Through June 2015 DR A F T 182 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT— PLANNING DIVISION 2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Estimated Budget Budget Budget General Fund Personal services 464,594$ 523,495$ 537,915$ 537,915$ 556,989$ 580,283$ Contractual services 90,766 105,863 85,500 88,000 111,500 212,500 Commodities 3,018 2,212 6,000 6,000 4,500 6,000 Central Services 46,059 43,609 46,000 47,172 48,108 48,660 CDBG Fund Contractual services 193,340 18,700 125,000 100,000 125,000 125,000 Construction Fund Capital outlay - - - - - 200,000 Total 797,777$ 693,879$ 800,415$ 779,087$ 846,097$ 1,172,443$ *For comparative purposes previous year figures may be adjusted to reflect realigned responsibilities. Planning Division Expenditures Personal services 63% Contractual services 27% Commodities 4% Central Services 6% Planning Expenditures by Type DR A F T For living, learning, raising families, and doing business. City of Edina COMMUNITY PROFILE DR A F T 184 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY PROFILE MARKET VALUE OF PROPERTY: LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Although the City has been nearly fully developed and our borders haven't changed for many years, total market value of properties in the City has grown. Like many communities, property values dropped somewhat after 2009, but the drop in Edina was not as severe as many other places. Residential and commercial redevelopment in recent years has contributed to the increase in the total market value of Edina. $- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Estimated market value of taxable property (in millions) Estimated Taxable 9,619$ 9,452$ 9,987 9,929 10,112 10,079 9,960 9,950 9,442 9,432 9,179 9,026 8,955 8,799 9,066 8,912 9,838 9,702 10,423 10,300 Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services. 2016 Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 Market Value (In millions) a 2011 Fiscal 2009 2010 2007 2008 a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown. The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification.DR A F T 185 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY PROFILE TOP TEN TAX PAYERS The City of Edina's local economy is healthy and diverse. There are several large tax payers in the City that are im- portant but none is dominant. Edina is not overly reliant on one business or industry. Centennial Lakes, Edina Percentage of Total Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Southdale Shopping Center 2,506,810$ 1 2.32% Galleria Shopping Center 1,978,800 2 1.83% Centennial Lakes Retail 788,526 3 0.73% Centennial Lakes Phase V 704,848 4 0.65% Southdale Office Park 701,274 5 0.65% Centennial Lakes Phase IV 691,196 6 0.64% Southdale Medical Building 620,285 7 0.57% National Car 508,794 8 0.47% Centennial Lakes Phase III 439,470 9 0.41% Target 439,250 10 0.41% Totals 9,379,253$ 8.68% Source: City of Edina Assessing Office 2014 Taxpayer DR A F T 186 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY PROFILE TOP TEN EMPLOYERS The City of Edina's local economy is healthy and diverse. There are several large employers in the City that are im- portant but none is dominant. Edina is not overly reliant on one employer or industry. Sources: 2014 data from ReferenceUSA, written and telephone survey (October 2014) done by Ehlers, and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. Percentage of Total City Employees Rank Employment Fairview Southdale Hospital 2,613 1 10.98% Edina Public Schools ISD #273 1,860 2 7.81% City of Edina 811 3 3.41% BI Worldwide 600 4 2.52% Regis Corporation 600 5 2.52% Barr Engineering 453 6 1.90% Lund Foods Holdings, Inc.405 7 1.70% International Dairy Queen Inc.400 8 1.68% Edina Realty 400 9 1.68% FilmTec Corporation 375 10 1.58% Totals 8,517 35.78% 2014 Employer DR A F T 187 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY PROFILE EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE TAXES High School Graduation Unemployment Population Rate Rate 47,448 92.1% 3.30% 46,896 92.0% 3.00% 47,090 92.0% 3.45% 48,169 92.0% 4.33% 48,169 92.4% 6.38% 47,941 91.6% 5.56% 48,262 92.2% 5.25% 48,829 97.4% 4.56% 49,216 97.7% 3.98% 49,216 97.8% 3.10%2014 2011 2012 Fiscal Year 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2013 Sources: Population data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council. High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County. Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. Each blue diamond indicates a different city in the MSP area. Includes all cities with population 25,000-100,000 2015 Taxes per LMC Property Tax Calculator 2014 Population per Met Council estimate Edina $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 Ci t y T a x e s o n $ 4 0 0 , 0 0 h o u s e Population Property Taxes in the MSP Metro AreaDR A F T DR A F T For living, learning, raising families, and doing business. City of Edina GLOSSARY DR A F T 190 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA G LOSSARY Accounting – A system to measure and communicate financial information about an organization, including annual results and current position. It has been called the “language of business”. Accrual basis of accounting – A method of accounting for transactions by recording revenues when they are earned (whether cash is received at the same time or not) and recording expenses when goods and services are received (whether cash is paid at the same time or not). Adopted budget – The City Council adopts a financial plan for a fiscal year, including revenues and other financing sources as well as expenditures, expenses and other uses. Appropriation – An authorization made by the legislative body of a government which permits officials to incur obligations against and to make expenditures of governmental resources. Assessed valuation – Market value for all real or personal property equals the price that a property would command under competitive, open-market conditions, at the time the property is assessed. The City Assessor’s Office determines assessed valuation. In Minnesota there is a one year delay between the time a property is valued and the payment of taxes based on that value. Asset – An accounting term. Any tangible or intangible economic resource that is capable of producing future value can be considered an asset. Assets are shown on the balance sheet. Asset values are sometimes estimated as of the balance sheet date. Balance sheet – Summarizes an entity’s financial position on a specific date, often the last day of the fiscal year. The balance sheet is sometimes described as a “snapshot of an entity’s financial position”. Governmental accounting sometimes uses alternative words or phrases to describe financial documents similar to a balance sheet, such as “Statement of Net Position” or “Statement of Fund Net Position”. Balanced budget – In the General Fund, when expenditures are exactly offset by an equal amount of revenue. Bond – A written promise to pay (debt) a specified sum of money (called principal, par or face value) at a specified future date (called the maturity date(s)) along with periodic interest paid at a specified percentage of the principal (interest rate). Bonds are typically used for long-term debt. Budget – The financial plan for the operation of a program or organization which includes an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period and the proposed means of financing those expenditures. Capital asset – An accounting term used to describe assets with significant value and having a useful life of several years. Capital assets are sometimes called fixed assets. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) – A plan to prioritize expenditures for significant projects and match financing to pay the project costs. The City of Edina prepares a five-year CIP every two years. Capital outlay – Expenditures for the acquisition of capital assets. DR A F T 191 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GLOSSARY Capital projects fund – A type of fund defined by GASB. Capital projects funds are used to account for all financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditures for capital outlay, other than those financed by proprietary funds. The City of Edina has one capital projects fund that we call the Construction fund. Central services – The City of Edina is a diverse organization that has several departments, divisions and business units. There are some common costs (overhead) like property and liability insurance, IT services, building maintenance and equipment maintenance that we have found are most efficiently performed centrally for all of our business units. The term central service is how we describe our system for allocating the costs of this overhead to the business units that benefit from them. Sometimes other cities will use the term “internal service”, which describes the same goal but is a slightly different process with different accounting rules. City Council – Five elected leaders, including the mayor, that represent the legislative arm of local government in Edina. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – The CDBG program is a federal program that dates back to 1974, and exists to provide communities with resources to address a wide range of unique community development needs. The City of Edina receives CDBG funding through Hennepin County. Debt service – Payment of interest and repayment of principal to holders of a government’s debt instruments. Debt service fund – A type of fund defined by GASB. Debt service funds are used to account for all financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditures for principal and interest. The City of Edina has one debt service fund that we call the Debt Service fund. Deficit – (1) May be used when discussing an entity’s balance sheet where liabilities exceed assets (2) Also may be used when discussing an entity’s income statement where expenditures or expenses exceed revenues during an accounting period. Depreciation – A system of allocating the cost of a capital asset over its useful life. The City of Edina uses depreciation in our enterprise funds, but not our governmental funds. Enterprise fund – A type of fund defined by GASB. Enterprise funds use full accrual accounting. The City of Edina has eight enterprise funds; Utilities fund, Liquor fund, Aquatic Center fund, Golf Course fund, Arena fund, Art Center fund, Edinborough fund, and Centennial Lakes fund. Expenditure – An accounting term often used when discussing governmental or modified accrual accounting. Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred, as expenses are recorded under accrual accounting. However, some changes in long-term liabilities, like debt service or compensated absences, are recorded as expenditures only when payment is due. Expense – An accounting term. Expenses include outflows of economic resources or depletions of assets during a period of time, like a month, quarter, or fiscal year. Fiscal disparities – A program in the Minneapolis/St. Paul (MSP) metropolitan area in which a portion of the commercial and industrial property value of each city and township is contributed to a tax base sharing pool. Each city and township then receives a distribution of property value from the pool based on market value and population in each city. DR A F T 192 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GLOSSARY Franchise fee – Sometimes called a franchise tax, this is revenue the City of Edina collects from a company in exchange for granting the right or license to market that company’s goods or services in the City’s borders. The City of Edina currently receives franchise fee revenue from Comcast Cable, Xcel Energy, and Centerpoint Energy. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) – The body of rules that govern accounting. The City of Edina uses accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for local governments. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is an influential body that sets GAAP. GAAP is enforced through the audit process, when auditors render opinions on the fairness of financial statement presentations in conformity with GAAP. General fund – The General fund is the City’s primary operating fund. It accounts for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for the specified purposes other than debt service and capital projects. It carries the basis activities of the City including Administration, Human Resources, Communications and Technology Services, Finance, Community Development, Parks and Recreation, Police, Fire, Engineering and Public Works. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) – An independent, non-governmental organization that is the official source of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) used by State and Local governments in the United States, including the City of Edina. The GASB was established in 1984 by agreement of the Financial Accounting Foundation (FAF) and 10 national associations of state and local government officials. Governmental funds – A category of funds that always includes a governmental entity’s general fund, special revenue funds, capital projects funds and debt service funds. Governmental funds use the modified accrual basis of accounting with revenues recognized in the accounting period in which they become available and measurable. Expenditures are generally recorded when a liability is incurred, as expenses are recorded under accrual accounting. However, some changes in long-term liabilities, like debt service or compensated absences, are recorded as expenditures only when payment is due. Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) – A professional association of local government finance officers in the United States and Canada, headquartered in downtown Chicago. The purpose of the Government Finance Officers Association is to enhance and promote the professional management of governments for the public benefit by identifying and developing financial policies and best practices and promoting their use through education, training, facilitation of member networking, and leadership. Homestead market value exclusion – Property that is homesteaded is eligible to receive the Homestead market value exclusion. The Homestead market value exclusion causes the amount of value that is taxable to be reduced by excluding a portion of a property’s estimated market value. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) – The Edina HRA is an entity legally separate from the City, established in 1974 for the purpose of undertaking urban redevelopment projects and assisting with the development of affordable housing. The members of the City Council comprise the five-member board of commissioners of the HRA. DR A F T 193 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GLOSSARY Income statement – Summarizes an entity’s revenues and expenses or expenditures for a specified accounting period, such as a month, quarter, or fiscal year. The income statement is sometimes also called the profit and loss (P&L), statement of operations, earnings statement or other similar term. Governmental accounting sometimes uses additional alternative words or phrases to describe financial documents similar to an income statement, such as “Statement of Activities”, “Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances” (governmental funds), or “Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position/Equity” (proprietary or enterprise Funds). Internal service fund – Internal service funds are used to account for financing of goods or services provided by one department or agency to other departments or agencies of the government on a cost-reimbursed basis. League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) – The LMC is a membership organization dedicated to promoting excellence in local government. The League serves its more than 800 member cities, including Edina, through advocacy, education and training, policy development, risk management, and other services. Levy limit – The amount a local unit of government is permitted to levy for specific services under state law. Annual levy limits, when applicable, are set by the State Legislature. Liability – An accounting term. A liability is an obligation arising from past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow of resources (assets). Liabilities are shown on the balance sheet. Liability values are sometimes estimated as of the balance sheet date. Local Government Aid (LGA) – A Minnesota State government revenue sharing program for cities with low property wealth or high service burdens that is intended to provide an alternative to the property tax. The City of Edina doesn’t receive LGA. Local sales taxes – A local tax levied on the sale of goods and services to be used for specific purposes by a local government. The City of Edina doesn’t impose or collect any local sales taxes. Major fund – Under GASB 34 certain funds are designated as major funds. Major funds must have their own columns in the fund financial statements in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The General fund is always a major fund and other funds are considered major if they meet certain financial criteria. Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) – The MLC is a lobbying group that provides a voice at the state capital for 16 suburban communities, including Edina, sharing common demographic, economic and tax base characteristics. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) – In 2013 the City began collecting franchise fee revenue from both Xcel and CenterPoint customers to be used for the creation, maintenance and improvement of non-motorized transportation facilities in Edina. Property tax levy – The City of Edina goes through a budget process to determine what services we will provide, what those services will cost, and where we will get the money. The City Council sets the annual property tax levy, which is then certified to Hennepin County for collection. Property tax refund – The State of Minnesota has a program to partially refund property taxes to those taxpayers whose property taxes are out of proportion with their incomes, according to program guidelines. The program is available to homeowners and renters. DR A F T 194 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GLOSSARY Quality of Life survey (QLS) – A survey of residents commissioned by the City of Edina designed to provide performance feedback to the City Council and city staff. Revenue – An accounting term. Revenues include money an organization receives during a period of time, like a month, quarter, or fiscal year. Special assessment – The City places a financial lien against a property to recoup the cost of certain improvements or services provided to a property, such as a street or utility improvement or unpaid utility services. Special revenue fund – A type of fund defined by GASB. Special revenue funds are used to account for all financial resources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. The City of Edina has five special revenue funds; HRA fund, PACS fund, CDBG fund, Police Special Revenue fund, and Braemar Memorial fund. State general property tax – The State of Minnesota imposes property taxes on commercial, industrial, and seasonal recreational properties. To be determined (TBD) – Information that cannot be verified. Tax capacity – The valuation of property based on market value and class rates. For properties in Edina, the City Assessor’s office sets the value, the State of Minnesota sets the class rates, and Hennepin County performs the calculation. DR A F T For living, learning, raising families, and doing business. City of Edina APPENDIX DR A F T 196 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES PURPOSE The City of Edina has a responsibility to provide quality services to its residents, and considers it important to do so in a fiscally responsible fashion designed to keep services and taxes as consistent as possible over time. These financial management policies are meant to serve as the framework upon which consistent operations may be built and sus- tained. OPERATING BUDGET POLICIES Scope. It is the City’s policy to budget for all governmental and enterprise funds. Accounting. The governmental funds use the modified accrual basis of accounting for budgeting and reporting pur- poses. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities for the current period. The City considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments are rec- orded only when payment is due. The Enterprise Funds use the accrual basis of accounting for budgeting and reporting purposes. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenue in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Stakeholder Input. The annual budget process is intended to weigh all competing requests for City resources within expected fiscal constraints. Requests for new programs made outside the annual budget process are discouraged. The City will provide ample time and opportunity for public input into its budget process every year. Balanced Budget Adoption. The operating budget for the General Fund will be balanced. The City will not use in- ternal or external short-term borrowing, asset sales, or one-time accounting changes to balance the General Fund budget. The balanced budget will include a reasonable annual appropriation for contingencies. Budgetary Controls. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level within the General Fund even though budgetary data is presented at lower levels (personal services, contractual services, commodities, and central services). Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year-end. The City Manager may approve budgetary transfers. The City Council may approve supplemental appropriations. DR A F T 197 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES Monitoring. Department Directors are responsible for administration of their respective department budgets. Such responsibility includes reviewing monthly financial reports to detect errors and assess progress, staying within budget authorization, and submitting requests for budget adjustments, when required. REVENUE POLICIES Policies. The City will endeavor to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system to shelter programs and services from short-term fluctuations in any single revenue source. Property Taxes. It is beneficial for residents and for the City to keep tax rates low and consistent from year to year. The City will strive to proactively avoid large increases in the operating budget levy. Fees and Charges. The City shall establish user charges and fees for General Fund program activities at a level relat- ed to the full cost of providing the services. Components of the user charges shall include direct and indirect costs of providing the service. The City will also consider policy objectives and market rates when setting fees. Transfers. Transfers should not be used as a revenue source to balance the operating budget except for the annual transfer from our liquor operations. Investment Income. The City will reasonably budget for investment revenue in our operating budget based on the conservative investment strategy outlined in our investment policy (under separate cover). FUND BALANCE POLICIES Definitions. The term fund balance describes the net assets of the City’s governmental funds calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP further divides fund balance into five categories; non- spendable fund balance, restricted fund balance, committed fund balance, assigned fund balance, and unassigned fund bal- ance. Nonspendable fund balance consists of amounts that cannot be spent because they are not in spendable form, such as prepaid items. Restricted fund balance consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions. Committed fund balance consists of amounts that are constrained for specific purposes that are internally imposed by formal action (resolution) of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless City Council removes or changes the specified use by taking the same type of action it employed to previ- ously commit those amounts. Assigned fund balance consists of amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In governmental funds other than the general fund, assigned fund balance represents the remaining amount that is not restricted or committed. In the general fund, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the City Council. Unassigned fund balance is the residual classification for the general fund and also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds. DR A F T 198 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES Policies. At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain nonspendable and restricted fund balance equal to the amounts required by GAAP for a variety of purposes, including but not limited to: prepaid expenditures, park dedica- tion fees, E-911 funds, forfeiture funds, and other assets restricted by grantors, contributors, creditors, or enabling leg- islation. At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain committed fund balance constrained for specific purposes by City Council. At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain assigned fund balance in the General Fund for investments as calcu- lated by the difference between market value and amortized value of investments held by the City at year-end. The City will also maintain assigned fund balance in the General Fund for Compensated Absences of 40% of the actual full- accrual General Fund liability for compensated absences. At the end of each fiscal year, the City’s goal is to maintain unassigned fund balance for Cash Flow in the General Fund in a range equal to 42-47% of the subsequent year’s budgeted tax revenue. In the event that unassigned fund balance falls above or below the desired range, the Finance Director shall report such amounts to the City Council as soon as practicable after the end of the fiscal year. Should the actual amount of unassigned fund balance fall below the desired range, the City shall create a plan to restore the appropriate levels. Should the actual amount of unassigned fund bal- ance fall above the desired range, any excess funds will remain unassigned pending the Council’s final decision concern- ing transfer to another fund. It is the policy of the City that, to the extent possible, such excess funds will be trans- ferred to the Construction Fund to support capital improvements and equipment. Available fund balances shall not be used for ongoing operating expenditures. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to first use restricted re- sources, then use unrestricted resources as they are needed. When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3) unassigned. CAPITAL OUTLAY POLICIES Equipment Replacement Program. The City strives to maintain its physical assets at a level that minimizes future repair and maintenance costs. To accomplish this goal, the City has established the Equipment Replacement Program to annually budget and set aside funds for the timely replacement of City equipment. The City’s Equipment Replacement Program includes equipment used for General Fund programs. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The goal of the City’s CIP is to develop a comprehensive program for use by decision makers to guide capital investments based on an assessment of the community’s needs, taking into account the best use of limited resources while providing efficient and effective municipal services. DR A F T 199 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES The City will develop a five-year plan for capital improvements and update it annually. The CIP process includes analyz- ing projects contributing to the public health and welfare, projects helping to maintain and improve the efficiency of the existing systems, and projects that define a future need within the community. The City will identify the estimated cost and potential funding sources for each capital project proposal in the CIP. Pur- chase contracts for equipment and projects included in the CIP must still be properly authorized according to the City’s Purchasing Policy. The CIP will include equipment and projects from any City fund. DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES Policy Limits. The City will use debt only for capital improvement or projects that have a life of more than 4 years. The City will avoid using debt for cash flow borrowing, operations, or repairs. When possible, the City will not use debt to finance equipment purchases when it is possible to purchase the equip- ment on a pay-as-you-go basis with equipment replacement program or capital improvement plan reserves. The City shall use G.O. tax increment bonds only when the development merits special consideration. The City’s capital improvement plan shall contain debt assumptions which match this policy and requires a commitment to long-range financial planning which looks at multiple years of capital and debt needs. Legal Limits. Minnesota Statues, Section 475 prescribes the statutory debt limit that outstanding principal of debt cannot exceed 2% of taxable market value. This limitation applies only to debt that is wholly tax-supported. The type of debt included is either general obligation debt of any size bond issue (G.O.) or lease revenue bond issues that were over $1,000,000 at the time of issuance. However, there are also several other types of debt that do not count against the limit. G.O. tax increment, G.O. special assessment, G.O. utility revenue, G.O. recreational facility revenue, and HRA-issued debt are considered to have a separate revenue source other than just taxes and are excluded from the legal debt limit calculation. Local ordinances do not limit the City’s ability to issue debt. Issuance Practices. The City uses the competitive sale method for its general obligation bond sales unless factors such as structure, size or market conditions compel the use of a negotiated sale. The City may use an outside bond attorney, an independent financial advisor, and/or other service providers to assist with the structuring and sale of the bonds. Debt Structuring. The City’s collective debt shall amortize at least 50% of its principal within 10 years. In all cases, the maturity shall be shorter than the life of the related assets. Conduit Debt. The City may participate in conduit debt financings. Development proposals are reviewed to deter- mine if they meet program objectives and whether the proposals are financially feasible. DR A F T 200 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Variable Rate Debt. The City may use variable rate debt to provide debt structuring flexibility and potential interest savings to the total debt portfolio. Variable rate debt should not constitute more than 20% of the City’s total debt obli- gations. Refunding. Current refunding bonds may be utilized when present value savings of 3% of refunded principal is achieved or in concert with other bond issues to save costs of issuance. Advance refunding bonds may be utilized when present value savings of 4% of refunded principal is achieved. Adopted by City Council February 20, 2007 Revisions: March 20, 2007 December 15, 2009 December 20, 2011 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES DR A F T December 1, 2015 Mayor and Council Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Resolution No. 2015-121: Setting 2016 Tax Levy and Adopting 2016 Operating Budget Information / Background: The City started the 2016-2017 Budget development process early in 2015. The rationale behind a two- year budget is to spend more time in the first year working on the budget, and the second year spending more time on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and less time making changes to the operating budget. The City followed that plan in 2015, with the focus being the 2016-2017 operating budgets. Important dates for the 2016-2017 Budget process were: May 15, 2015, Department Heads finalize 2016-2017 budget requests. July 8, 2015, City’s Executive Leadership Team (ELT) reviews the 2016-2017 draft budget. July 21, 2015, Council work session to introduce City Manager Scott Neal’s proposed 2016-2017 City Wide Work Plan and Budget August 18, 2015, Council work session to review proposed 2016-2017 Budgets. September 1, 2015, Council adopts a formal resolution to set the 2016 preliminary levy and budget. November 4, 2015, Council work session to review final proposed 2016-2017 Budgets and Work Plans. December 1, 2015, Public Hearing on the 2016 operating budget and levy and adoption of formal resolution finalizing the 2016 Budget and property tax levy. The City is required to certify our final property tax levy to the county auditor by December 28, 2015. The final levy may be less than or equal to, but not higher than the preliminary levy. STAFF REPORT Page 2 The attached Resolution No. 2015-121 will set the final 2016 tax levies of $25,023,952 for the General Fund, $20,000 for the Arts and Culture Fund, $1,680,000 for the Construction Fund to be used for equipment replacement, $946,000 for city hall debt (levy through 2020), $385,901 for gymnasium debt (levy through 2025), $443,000 for fire station debt (levy through 2027), $1,561,000 for public works facility debt (levy through 2029), and $1,167,620 for sports dome project debt (levy through 2034). The total market value based referendum levy would be set at $571,650 for park referendum debt service (levy through 2016). These tax levies are equal to the preliminary levies set by the City Council on September 1, 2015. The County used these tax levies to calculate and mail parcel-specific notices to property owners. The attached resolution reflects the budget and levies presented for the December 1, 2015 Truth in Taxation hearing. While Council and staff have discussed alternatives to the September 1 preliminary budget throughout the fall, staff are presenting it to Council for the December 1 public hearing for approval in order to preserve the transparency of the budget formation process. Following the public hearing, the Council has the following options: 1. Approve the September 1 preliminary budget as proposed. 2. Defer action on the 2016 budget to the December 15 Council meeting and provide direction to staff on how to amend the budget in order to gain Council support. 3. Defer action on the 2016 budget to the December 15 Council meeting with no further direction to staff. Staff continue to recommend option 1, approve the September 1 preliminary budget as proposed. STAFF REPORT Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-121 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR THE YEAR 2016, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR YEAR 2016, PAYABLE IN 2016 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Budgets for all Governmental Funds for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2016 is hereby adopted as after this set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefore: Braemar Arts & Debt Environmental General HRA PACS CAS CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Efficiency Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 25,023,952$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 5,075,171$ -$ 1,680,000$ 31,799,123$ Reductions - - - - - - - - - - - - Net tax revenue 25,023,952 - - - - - - 20,000 5,075,171 - 1,680,000 31,799,123 Tax increments - 2,500,000 - - - - - - - - - 2,500,000 Franchise fees & other taxes 810,000 - 1,200,000 200,000 - - - - - - 105,000 2,315,000 Special assessments - - - - - - - - - - 4,127,890 4,127,890 Licenses and permits 4,023,160 - - - - - - - - - 90,000 4,113,160 Intergovernmental 1,191,550 - - - 125,000 36,000 - - - - 3,090,000 4,442,550 Charges for services 3,940,310 50,000 - - - - - - - - 35,000 4,025,310 Fines and forfeitures 975,000 - - - - - - - - - - 975,000 Investment income 120,000 77,000 - - - 300 200 - 10,000 - 70,000 277,500 Other revenue 477,900 - - - - 134,061 5,000 4,850 - - 100,000 721,811 Transfers 100,000 - - - - - - - 2,630,628 - 200,000 2,930,628 Debt issued - - - - - - - - - - 3,852,396 3,852,396 Other financing sources - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 36,661,872 2,627,000 1,200,000 200,000 125,000 170,361 5,200 24,850 7,715,799 - 13,350,286 62,080,368 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 1,896,810 4,780,835 - - - - - - - - 25,000 6,702,645 Communication & tech. 1,104,618 - - - - - - - - - 749,129 1,853,747 Human resources 790,345 - - - - - - - - - - 790,345 Finance 833,624 - - - - - - - - - 50,000 883,624 Public works 8,926,600 - - - - - - - - 104,000 1,251,836 10,282,436 Engineering 1,585,209 - 1,252,566 153,126 - - - - - - 8,251,528 11,242,429 Police 11,045,546 - - - - 174,000 - - - - 732,650 11,952,196 Fire 7,457,253 - - - - - - - - - 695,000 8,152,253 Parks & recreation 1,374,922 - - - - - - 22,425 - - 323,100 1,720,447 Community development 1,646,945 - - - 125,000 - - - - - - 1,771,945 Debt service - - - - - - - - 7,552,545 - - 7,552,545 Transfers - - - - - - - - - - 2,630,628 2,630,628 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 36,661,872 4,780,835 1,252,566 153,126 125,000 174,000 - 22,425 7,552,545 104,000 14,708,871 65,535,240 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services 25,797,378 123,970 112,566 103,126 - - - - - - 102,803 26,239,843 Contractual services 4,858,026 655,865 20,000 35,000 125,000 104,000 - 20,400 - - 214,760 6,033,051 Commodities 2,082,840 1,000 20,000 15,000 - 15,000 - 2,025 - - 26,149 2,162,014 Central services 3,923,628 - - - - - - - - - 1,968 3,925,596 Equipment - - - - - 55,000 - - - - 2,058,177 2,113,177 Capital outlay - 4,000,000 1,100,000 - - - - - - 104,000 9,674,386 14,878,386 Debt service - - - - - - - - 7,552,545 - - 7,552,545 Transfers - - - - - - - - - - 2,630,628 2,630,628 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 36,661,872 4,780,835 1,252,566 153,126 125,000 174,000 - 22,425 7,552,545 104,000 14,708,871 65,535,240 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE -$ (2,153,835)$ (52,566)$ 46,874$ -$ (3,639)$ 5,200$ 2,425$ 163,254$ (104,000)$ (1,358,585)$ (3,454,872)$ 2016 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS Section 2: The Budgets for all Enterprise Funds for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2016 is hereby adopted as after this set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefore: STAFF REPORT Page 4 Aquatic Golf Sports Art Risk Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Management Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 19,704,773$ 12,414,257$ 975,477$ 2,955,168$ 2,230,250$ 396,310$ 453,350$ 1,350,800$ 779,000$ 731,508$ 41,990,893$ Intergovernmental 297,000 - - - - - - - - - 297,000 Investment income 74,237 - 7,000 8,000 2,000 3,000 2,000 14,000 3,000 - 113,237 Other revenue 10,000 10,000 - - - - 1,500 - - - 21,500 Transfers - - - 150,000 200,000 - 100,000 - 50,000 - 500,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 20,086,010 12,424,257 982,477 3,113,168 2,432,250 399,310 556,850 1,364,800 832,000 731,508 42,922,630 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration - 11,762,118 - - - - - - - - 11,762,118 Human resources - - - - - - - - - 665,000 665,000 Finance 298,393 - - - - - - - - - 298,393 Public works 14,783,880 - - - - - - - - - 14,783,880 Engineering 239,096 - - - - - - - - - 239,096 Police 496,970 - - - - - - - - - 496,970 Parks and recreation - - 918,406 3,202,114 2,610,691 721,441 684,447 1,622,702 1,069,487 - 10,829,288 Transfers 100,000 700,000 - - - - - - - - 800,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 15,918,339 12,462,118 918,406 3,202,114 2,610,691 721,441 684,447 1,622,702 1,069,487 665,000 39,874,745 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS - 9,326,730 42,000 185,599 105,500 - 2,750 85,000 14,000 - 9,761,579 Personal services 2,055,038 1,492,365 331,305 1,356,923 871,133 58,272 439,729 774,962 635,066 60,000 8,074,793 Contractual services 7,312,068 517,906 179,200 490,794 729,950 148,180 106,350 352,250 183,925 605,000 10,625,623 Commodities 1,065,750 74,009 89,150 313,990 104,250 3,277 71,250 169,800 135,800 - 2,027,276 Central services 682,320 256,608 33,228 130,404 68,676 11,712 40,368 68,940 60,696 - 1,352,952 Depreciation 4,227,000 94,500 241,500 640,000 600,000 500,000 24,000 171,750 40,000 - 6,538,750 Interest 476,163 - 2,023 84,404 131,182 - - - - - 693,772 Transfers 100,000 700,000 - - - - - - - - 800,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 15,918,339 12,462,118 918,406 3,202,114 2,610,691 721,441 684,447 1,622,702 1,069,487 665,000 39,874,745 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 4,167,671$ (37,861)$ 64,071$ (88,946)$ (178,441)$ (322,131)$ (127,597)$ (257,902)$ (237,487)$ 66,508$ 3,047,885$ 2016 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS STAFF REPORT Page 5 Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts hereinafter set forth: GENERAL FUND $ 25,023,952 ARTS & CULTURE FUND $ 20,000 CONSTRUCTION FUND –EQUIPMENT LEVY $ 1,680,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP BONDS – SERIES 2010A (City Hall) $ 946,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS - SERIES 2015A (Gym) $ 385,901 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP BONDS - SERIES 2007A (Fire) $ 443,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY DEBT $ 1,561,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS – SERIES 2014 (Sports Dome) $ 1,167,620 TOTAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY $ 31,227,473 Section 6. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount below for the debt levy of the market value based referendum levy and canceling the portion of the levy not required to produce the following amount: GO PARK AND RECREATION BONDS SERIES 1996B/2005A/2014B $ 571,650 Passed and adopted by the City Council on December 1, 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 1, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 20___. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2015-119 & 2015-120: Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning at 6612 Xerxes and 3101 66th Street West for Bull Moose Construction Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2015-119 and 2015-120, approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning. INTRODUCTION: Bull Moose Construction is proposing to tear down the old Best Buy retail building at 3101 66th Street West and the single family home at 6612 Xerxes and build a six-story, 210 unit apartment with an attached 1,760 square foot restaurant/coffee shop with outdoor seating/dining on York Avenue. On November 12, 205, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Development Plan and Rezoning. Vote 5 Ayes and 3 Nays. The Commission added a condition that the boulevard trees be subject to review and approval of Hennepin County. Two additional conditions were suggested but not accepted. The first was to add more articulation to the south wall of the parking enclosure; and the second was to add variations to the height of the sixth story on the north and east elevations, similar to the Lennar project to the south. (See attached Planning Commission minutes.) See the project detail and background in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Minutes Resolution No. 2015-119 Resolution No. 2015-120 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Cary Teague Community Development Director Meeting Date November 12, 2015 Agenda # V.A. . , INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Project Description Bull Moose Construction is proposing to tear down the old Best Buy retail building at 3101 66th Street West and the single family home at 6612 Xerxes and build a six-story, 210 unit apartment with an attached 1,760 square foot restaurant/coffee shop with outdoor seating/dining on York Avenue. (See property location on pages A1—A3.) There would be two levels of parking, one covered level at grade; the second level is underground. Surface level spaces would be available for users of the restaurant. Public space would be provided with the boulevard style sidewalk with landscaping along York Avenue 66th Street and Xerxes Avenue; an open green space "pocket-park" on Xerxes Avenue; a sidewalk that would connect the pocket park area through the development to the restaurant; and new boulevard sidewalk on Southdale Circle. Private amenities included in the project for the residents include a fitness center on the main level facing the 66th and York intersection to provide activity along the street. A pool and plaza deck with vegetation is provided on the second level on the south side of the building. This application was submitted prior to the effective date of the City's new affordable housing policy; however, the applicant is promising to provide 5% (10) of the units for affordable housing. See narrative and plans on pages A6—A34, and larger scale plans in the attached development book.) To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are requested: Height increase from 70 feet to 75 feet. )=. Housing Density increase from 75 units per acre to 105 units per acre. • Re-guiding the single-family home from LDR, Low Density Residential to CAC, Community Activity Center. In addition, the following land use applications are requested: • Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and )>. Preliminary Development Plan. This review is the first of a two-step process of review. Should the preliminary rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment be approved, the following are required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. The applicant would make any changes/revisions necessary from the preliminary plans, and submit a final development plan and rezoning application. That final review is then a review for consistency with the approved preliminary plans before the City Council. 2. Staff submittal of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the sketch plans on pages A4—A5; and the minutes from those meetings on pages A38—A42.) The sketch plans were generally well received; the applicant has developed the proposed plans by attempting to address issues that were raised by the Planning Commission and City Council at Sketch Plan. Changes to the plans include: • Provision of 5% of the units as affordable housing; that would be a total of 10 units toward the City's goal of providing an additional 212 units by 2020. • The pocket park has been made slightly bigger. • A pedestrian connection has been made through the development on the south side to connect the park to York Avenue. • The size of the restaurant has been reduced. A large scale restaurant would have required more parking and at a high cost. By reducing the size of the restaurant, the provision of affordable housing became more achievable. The applicant was also concerned about how a restaurant with late hours would mix with the residential homes above. The coffee shop would be a more compatible use. 2 • The driveway entrance on Xerxes has been moved to the north to address the concern of the City of Richfield regarding its proximity to the existing residential property to the south. )=. More stone on the building was added to the east side (Richfield side) of the building facing 66th Street and Xerxes Avenue. • A one-story podium was added on Xerxes Avenue. • A detailed response to the Greater Southdale Area Working Group Principles has been provided. (See pages A6i-A61.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A retail shopping center; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided Regional Medical. Easterly: City of Richfield. Goodyear Auto service center and single-family homes that are zoned Single-Family Residential, but the Richfield Comprehensive Plan guides them for medium density, 7-12 units per acre. (See pages A43—A44.) Southerly: Taco Bell and a small commercial center; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Westerly: Southdale; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Existing Site Features The subject property is 2.1 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains a retail building with surrounding surface parking. The single family home is on the southeast side. (See pages A2—A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC — Community Activity Center and LDR, Low Density Residential. (See pages A3a-A3b.) Zoning: PCD-3, Planned Commercial District & R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District. (See page A3c.) Site Circulation Access to the site would be from Southdale Circle for residents and users of the coffee shop/restaurant. Residents also have an access off Xerxes. 3 Extensive pedestrian paths are planned for the site. A sidewalk would be provided around the entire perimeter of the site. This site contains street perimeter on 3+ sides. Boulevard style sidewalks would be provided on all street sides, York, Southdale Circle, 66th Street and Xerxes. A sidewalk would be connected through the park and south of the building to connect to Southdale Circle and York. This allows pedestrian flow through the development, which is a concept discussed by the Greater Southdale Area Working Group. The provision of the pocket park and the outdoor area associated with the coffee shop, provide public areas for people to come to and stay for a while is another concept discussed by the Working Group. Given the development activity that is contemplated for the 66th and York intersection, staff is exploring options with Hennepin County for pedestrian movement through the intersection and to the north. Discussions have included the possibility in eliminating the "free right turns" at the intersection, and or creating a two-lane round-a-about. The County is open to exploring these possibilities and has stated that these options are not "fatally flawed" at this point. In consideration of the giving up the "free-right" turn option, the County would not want to vacate the right-of-way; rather, we would like to use the space for more comfortable pedestrian crossings and public/green space. The applicant would be required to participate in cost sharing for improvements made for pedestrian circulation if these options are further developed. This shall be incorporated into the development agreement. Staff will continue to explore and study these options with the County. It should not impact the proposed development itself in terms of building location. Traffic & Parking Study WSB and Associates conducted a parking and traffic study. (See the attached study on pages A49—A69.) The Study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing adjacent roadways and there would be adequate parking provided. No roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed site development. (See page A69 of the study.) Bike Parking/Racks Bike parking would be provided for each unit within the building. A dedicated bike enclosure/repair area is proposed in the southeast corner of the parking level 1. Exterior bike racks will be provided for visitors and coffee shop users. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to,have 34 over story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing 85 over story trees, including existing and proposed. The trees 4 would include a mixture of Maple, Pine, Elm, Birch, Crabapple and Serviceberry. (See pages A8—A8a, and the development plan'book.) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. Staff would work with Hennepin County in regard to boulevard trees. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading for the retail space would take place in the parking area east of the retail. Trash would be collected within the building and the garbage truck would pick up on the south side. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached pages A35-A36. Highlighted items include: a requirement for a developer's agreement and dedicated easements over public sidewalks and utilities. Any approvals should be conditioned on the conditions outline in the director of engineering's memo dated November 3, 2015. Building/Building Material The building would be constructed of high quality stone, pre-finished metal, cementitious siding and panel and glass. (See rendering on pages A18—A25.) A materials board would be presented at the Planning Commission Meeting. Mechanical Equipment No mechanical equipment has been shown on the plans. Rooftop equipment is planned for the middle of the building and would be only 3 feet tall; therefore not visible from property lines. Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard (street side) of the development. Lighting A lighting plan has been submitted and conforms to all city code requirements. (See page A30.) Signage The underlying zoning of the property would be PCD-3, therefore, would be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. Staff would recommend a full signage plan be submitted as part of the Final Development 5 Plan. Plans should specifically include location and size of monument signs and way finding signage. Specific signage regulations would be incorporated into the PUD Zoning District including way finding signage. Height At Sketch Plan review, the Planning Commission and City Council were generally acceptable of six stories on this site. Suggestions were made to provide podium height and use brick on this side of the building facing Richfield. The applicant has done that to minimize impact. The pocket park which could be utilized by Richfield residents also provides some buffer/increase setback to the residential area to the south. The sidewalk would allow better pedestrian access to the commercial area on York and the transit station at Southdale. This access would be utilized more when Richfield redevelops to medium density per their Comprehensive Plan. (See Richfield Comprehensive Plan for this area on pages A43-A44.) The applicant has included a one-story podium on Xerxes; the setback on Xerxes for the first story is 25 feet back from the road. The 2-6 story set back is proposed at 33 feet. (See setbacks on page A27.) Podium height is also being proposed on the 66th Street and York Avenue side. Given podium height is proposed on both sides of the building staff would support increase of height from 4 to 6 stories in for height in this situation. The City recently amended the Comprehensive Plan to allow up to 6 stories and 70 feet in this area when podium height is utilized. (See comprehensive Plan language on pages 11 of this report.) The applicant is proposing to increase the height requirement to 75 feet. Setback from Single Family Homes Within the underlying PCD-3 zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings six stories tall be required to be setback twice the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. Therefore, a 150-foot setback would be required from the six-story portion of the building. The six- story portion of the building would be setback 127 feet from homes in Richfield and 81 feet from homes in Edina. (See page A28.) The Richfield Comprehensive Plan guides those homes for medium density development at 7-12 units per acre, so the long term plan for that area is to be more densely developed, and not single-family homes. (See Richfield Comprehensive Plan on pages A43—A44.) Shadow Study The applicant completed a shadow study to determine impacth the height of the building might have on the surrounding area. (To be presented at the 6 Planning Commission meeting.) As demonstrated on pages A47-A48, the shadow study done for the Lennar project to the south concluded that the biggest impact would only be for a few hours roughly from 3-5pm in the winter months when shadows would be cast over the commercial development in Richfield. Comprehensive Guide Plan/Density To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are requested: • Height increase from 70 feet to 75 feet. • Housing Density from 75 units per acre to 105 units per acre. • The single-family home from LDR, Low Density Residential to CAC, Community Activity Center. Housing Density. The proposed density of 105 units per acre would be on the high end of the end of the density range for the City's high density residential development as indicated in the table below. The site is however, located in the CAC, Community Activity Center, which has an established density range of up to 75 units per acre. The site's location on two arterial roadways provides a good location for higher density. The City is exploring the possibility of increasing density in the Greater Southdale area with the work being done by the Greater Southdale Area Working Group. The Comprehensive Plan suggests allowing higher density and floor area ratio subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. The proposed plans contain most all of these elements. There' is adequate utility capacity available; the new transit station is located across the street at Southdale; the WSB traffic study concludes there would be minimal impact to the roads; underground parking is provided, there are no surface parking lots, a park/open space area is provided; 5% of the housing units would be designated for affordable housing; sustainable design principles are applied, and there are vast improvements in pedestrian circulation to move pedestrians around and through the site. Below are existing high density developments in the City. Note that the trend in multi-family development is higher density. This is due to the high cost of land in Edina, the requirement for affordable housing, and the added cost of redeveloping a site with existing buildings: 7 Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental (Senior Housing) 7151 York 364 63 The Durham 7201 York 264 1 46 6500 France (Senior Housing) 6500 France 188 80 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 Walker Elder Suites (Senior) 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69th & York Apartments 3121 69th Street 114 30 Lennar 6725 York 240 52 71 France (Byerly's) 71 France 234 23 Beacon 66 France 39 43 As provided during recent redevelopment review, the following is 'a list of suburban examples of high density regulation and development in cities adjacent to Edina. The proposed density for the project is similar. St. Louis Park. St. Louis Park allows densities within a PUD to be up to 75 units per acre in high density and mixed-use districts. Additionally, for PUD's in an office district, if there is a housing component as part of a mixed-use PUD, the City may remove the upper limit on residential density on a case-by-case basis. This happened recently within The West End Redevelopment project. "The Flats at the West End" has a density of 111 units per acre. It is 119 units on a 1.07 acre site. Minnetonka. Minnetonka does not have a density cap within their Comprehensive Plan. They define high density residential as anything over 12 units per acre. Developments are then considered on a case by case basis. Factors that go in to the consideration include: environmental impacts/conditions such,as wetlands, floodplain, steep slopes and trees; type of housing; provision of affordable housing; traffic impact; site plan; and surrounding area. Minnetonka does not have an example project similar to the one proposed here. Minnetonka is 8 primarily made up of large lots, with mature trees wetlands and open space. However, their Comprehensive Plan does allow consideration of dense development. Bloomington. The City of Bloomington allows up to 50 units per acre in general; however, in areas that are designated as "High Intensity Mixed Use with Residential" (HX-R District) an FAR minimum 1.5 with a max of 2.0) is required. The density may be increased if the following is provided: Below grade parking; provision of a plaza or park; affordable housing; sustainable design principles; provision of public art. With the exception of the park/plaza; the applicant is proposing all of the other items. Bloomington has had three recent projects that have exceeded a 2.0 FAR: The Reflections condominiums along 34th Ave (95 units per acre); Summer House senior apartments at 98th and Lyndale (59 units per acre); and Genesee apartments at Penn and American Boulevard. (73 units per acre) Given these examples of high density residential development in our surrounding cities, the proposed density would seem reasonable for this site, considering its location in a commercial area, with convenient access to Metro Transit bus service. Below is the existing language within the Comprehensive Plan for the CAC, Community Activity Center. Please note the development guidelines, which the proposed development has accommodated. The text highlighted in red would be added to the existing text to accommodate the proposed change. Nonresidential and Mixed Use Categories Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines CAC The most intense district Form-based design 12-7-5 105 residential Community Activity in terms of uses, height standards for building dwelling units/acre Center and coverage, placement, massing and Floor to Area Ratio-Per Example: Greater Primary uses: Retail, street-level treatment. current Zoning Code: Southdale area (not including large multi- office, lodging, entertainment and Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to maximum of 0.5 to 1.0* Floor to Area Ratio may family residential neighborhoods such residential uses, combined or in separate streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to as Centennial Lakes) buildings. down" at boundaries with utilities capacity, level of Secondary uses: lower-density districts and transit service available, and Institutional, recreational upper stories "step back" impact on adjacent roads. uses. from street. Other desired items to allow Mixed use should be More stringent design greater density or density on encouraged, and may be standards for buildings > 5 the high end of the required on larger sites. stories, Emphasize pedestrian circulation; re-introduce finer-grained circulation patterns where feasible. residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, 9 provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. Using the above amended text as a basis for review of the subject project, a case could be made to support the proposed high density through the PUD-Zoning process. As noted above in the "Description, Land Uses," the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Height. At Sketch Plan review, the Planning Commission and City Council expressed some concern in regard to six stories on the site, especially on the Richfield and Xerxes Avenue side of the site. Podium height was recommended to minimize the height. The applicant has included a one-story podium on Xerxes. The pocket park also provides some setback. Land Use. Within the City of Edina, the existing single family homes on this site are surrounded by commercial area that is guided as Community Activity Center. (See pages A3a-A3c.) The only reason these are now guided for low density residential is because of the existing use. They are not uses compatible within the surrounding area within the City of Edina. The property in Richfield is guided commercial and medium density residential. The proposed land use is consistent with the uses allowed in the CAC. The City amended the Comprehensive Plan in similar circumstances for the Lennar project on the old Wicke's furniture site to the south. Staff therefore, would recommend that the Comprehensive Plan designation for the single-family home be amended to be guided as CAC, Community Activity Center similar to the surrounding property. The map on the following page shows how the Comprehensive Plan would be amended to accommodate the height change and land use designation change. The changes are highlighted in red. 10 OR Pa[klawn Ave Legend Wv - Low Dengh Residenhal OR- Office Rehdental Regional hooka] WAR- LowDeehhAlloched Residaffial 0- Office MN OSP - Open SoeCe end P ht. MW- Medium Reffidential MI MOO- Mffied Use Center PEP - Put folSeml-Puthc OE I-0R- Iffigh Dusty Rest:Rolla ! CAC- ComrounlyAcIvly Center LAH - Umite0Actess lighem ((a- Neighborhood Corrrnonlal En I - p 05CD.To L_Ok u\c- 05th St 3-5 W Seth St 25 / 2 0 0 7 2 : 13 : Height Limits 2 Stories: 24' 3 Stories: 36' 4 Stories: 48' 5 Stories: 60' 8 Stories: 96' 9 Stories: 108' 10 Stories: 120' 12 Stories: 144' J-1 Standard Height I I Podium Height w ins St v pmington City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights Southeast Quadrant Figure 4.6B 00 Data Source: URS 05 Miles *Height may be increased to six stories & 70 75 feet if podium height is utilized on York and Xerxes subject to review and approval of the City Council. 11 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section 36-253 of the Edina City Code provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; 12 h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which is desci-ibed as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Primary uses include retail and residential. Mixed uses are encouraged. The proposal would be a mixture of uses within the building with residential and a small area of retail. The site would be very pedestrian friendly with extensive pedestrian paths are planned for the site. A boulevard style sidewalk would be provided along all street fronts (4 sides) and an east-west sidewalk is provided through the development to move pedestrians through the site the Southdale area without having to walk up to 66th. Residents in Richfield and ground level units on Xerxes would primarily benefit from this sidewalk. There would be individual sidewalk connections from ground level units to the perimeter sidewalk. A transitional area is created by the pocket park that provides a separation from the single-family homes, and future medium density area to the east. As recommended in the Comprehensive Plan, and by the Planning Commission and City Council as part of the Sketch Plan review, podium height would be utilized on Xerxes Avenue to lessen impact to the single- family homes in Richfield. The applicant would provide 10 units for affordable housing (5% of the development.) This will assist the City in meeting its affordable housing goal of 212 units by 2020. To date the City has approved 159 units for affordable housing and 20 have been built; and another 39 are anticipated in the next 1-2 years. The building serves as a "gateway" into Edina. The curved shape of the building is unique and fits the curved shape of the lot. There are no surface parking lots proposed for the site. All parking is under the building. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Chapter 13 36 shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R-1, R-2 and PRD-1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. The proposed uses, retail and multiple-family residential housing are uses allowed in the Community Activity Center, as described in the Comprehensive Plan, and within the underlying PCD-3 Zoning District. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following; where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which encourages the mixing of retail and multi-family residential uses. The proposed plans are therefore, consistent with the land uses in Comprehensive Plan. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; Again, the proposal is for a mixture of land uses. ill. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As indicated in table earlier within this report, and the fact that the site is located in a commercial area on York Avenue, near Southdale, Metro Transit and an arterial roadway, the proposed density is appropriate for this site. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively.appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. 14 The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the underlying PCD-3 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone this site to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and number of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. (See the preliminary PUD Ordinance on pages A45-A46.) Please note that a few City Standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The site layout encourages pedestrian movement; would utilize podium height on both Xerxes and York, bringing one story up to the street on Xerxes, and stepping back the mass of the building on York. The project would provide mixed use on one site. The design of the building is of a high quality. Proposed materials include high quality stone, metal and siding. (See page A25.) The development would incorporate improved landscaping and green space within the development. The site is mostly building and paved surface today. As demonstrated on the attached, there will be an increase in green space. 15 Compliance Table City Standard (PCD-3) Proposed Building Setbacks 75 feet 35-75 feet 35-75 feet 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet 150 feet 15 feet* 15 feet* 28 feet* , 15-25 feet (per the plan)* ' 26-33 feet (per the plan)* 15 feet* 12 feet* 50 feet* 60 feet* „ 81 feet* Front—York Avenue Front — 66th Street (Story 1 ) (Story 2-6) Front — Xerxes (Story 1 ) (Story 2-6) Rear — Southdale Circle Rear—South Side Rear —South to Residential (Story 1) (Story 2-6) Setback to Single Family Homes Building Height Four stories and 48 feet Six Stories & 70 feet if podium height is used Six Stories & 75 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. 2.38% ' Parking Stalls 10 — retail 210 enclosed (residential) 220 total ; 10+ for the retail (shared) 245 regular stalls 16 tandem stalls 271 total Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance would be required under PCD-3 Zoning 16 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Are the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments regarding Land Use, Height and Density reasonable to allow the proposed development? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. Within the City of Edina, the single family homes are surrounded by land that is guided as Community Activity Center. (See page A3-A3a.) The only reason these are now guided for low density residential is because of the existing use. They are not uses compatible within the surrounding area within the City of Edina. The proposed land use is consistent with the uses allowed in the CAC. The City of Richfield has commercial area to the east (Goodyear Tire and Auto) and guided the single family homes on the east side of Xerxes as medium density residential; therefore, the long term vision of both Edina and Richfield in this area is for higher densities. 2. Given the podium height proposed on Xerxes, 66th and York, the proposed height is reasonable. At Sketch Plan review, the Planning Commission and City Council expressed some concern in regard to six stories on the site, especially on the Richfield and Xerxes Avenue side of the site. Podium height was recommended to minimize the height. The applicant has both included a podium on Xerxes, and has provided the pocket park to provide some separation. The proposed setback is 25 feet for the one story portion of the building; and the 2-6 story portion of the building has a proposed setback of 33 feet. Podium height is also being proposed on the 66th and York Avenue side. (See pages A20, A21 and A27.) 3. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use, which is predominantly residential, seems appropriate for the area. 4. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. 17 • Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site for the following reasons: 1. As highlighted above on pages 12-15, the proposal meets Ole City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provide a mixture of use within the building with residential and retail. b. Create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Boulevard style sidewalks would be provided around on all roadways (4 streets) and a new east west sidewalk connection from Xerxes to the Southdale area would belprovided from the pocket park for residents along Xerxes, including Richfield. c. Podium Height would be used on York, 66th Street and Xerxes. d. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative, (See page A6d.) including: LED lighting; increased insulation and thermal envelope above code; energy-Star rated appliances; recycled storm water for irrigation, low/no VOC paints and primers and adhesives. e. Ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 2. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 3. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. (See traffic study on pages A49—A69.) 4. The public realm provided for the development would invite people in to stay at the site in the public park provided on Xerxes and the coffee shop and outdoor seating area on York. Boulevard style sidewalks are provided to comfortably move residents around the building and through the project to create a comfortable pedestrian experience. A pedestrian connection is also provided through the site from the park along the south lot line. 5. The applicant would provide 10 units for affordable housing (5% of the development.) This will assist the City in meeting its affordal?le housing goal of 212 units by 2020. To date the City has approved 159 units for affordable 18 housing and 20 have been built; and another 39 are anticipated in the next 1-2 years. 6. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower- density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. i. Provision of affordable housing. 7. The proposal addresses many of the working principles of the Greater Southdale Area Working Group. (See pages A6i-A61.) 8. The site is a gateway into Edina, and the building has taken the curved shape of the site that it sits on. 19 Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendments Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: D Height increase from 70 feet to 75 feet. D Increase the housing density from 75 units per acre to 105 units per acre in the CAC, Community Activity Center. D The single-family home from LDR, Low Density Residential to CAC, Community Activity Center. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. The City of Richfield has guided the single family homes on the east side of Xerxes as medium density residential; therefore, the long term vision of both Edina and Richfield in this area is for higher densities. 2. Podium height is proposed on both Xerxes, 66th and York as recommended in the Comprehensive Plan. The six-story portion of the building is stepped back into the site to minimize impact on adjacent property. 3. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use at 2.38, which is predominantly residential, is appropriate for the area. 4. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD- 3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the old Best Buy retail building at 3101 66th Street West and the single family home at 6612 Xerxes and build a six- story 210 unit apartment with an attached restaurant/coffee shop with outdoor seating/dining on York Avenue. 20 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents in the City of Richfield to Southdale. 3. The site is a gateway into Edina, and the building has taken the curved shape of the site that it sits on. Podium Height would be used on York Avenue, 66th Street and Xerxes. 4. The public realm provided for the development that would invite people in to stay at the site in the public park provided on Xerxes and the coffee shop and outdoor seating area on York. Boulevard style sidewalks are provided to comfortably move residents around the building and through the project to create a comfortable pedestrian experience. A pedestrian connection is also provided through the site from the park along the south lot line. 5. The applicant would provide 10 units for affordable housing. (Five-percent of the development.) 6. Sustainable design principles would be utilized. The proposed buildings would be a high quality stone, metal, cementitious siding and panel, and glass building. Stone is proposed at the street level. 7. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 8. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 9. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 10. The proposal addresses many of the working principles of the Greater Southdale Area Working Group as mentioned in the above findings. 21 11. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower- density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated October 12 & 30, 2015. Final plans must show all mechanical equipment and the means to screen it. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located in front of the building on a public street. , 22 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. , 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. ) 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated November 5, 2015. 6. As part of a Developers Agreement, the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing improvements to the 66th and York intersection which may include elimination of the right turn lane, providing green space and improving pedestrian crossings. 1 7. Five percent (5%) of the housing units shall be designated for affordable housing. Specific detail would be determined at the time of final approval. 8. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. The building shall be designed to be 15% more energy efficient than the current state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. ) 9. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 10. Trash removal and deliveries shall take place off the Southdale Circle entrance. 1 Deadline for a city decision: February 1, 2016 23 59714 Wg-1.•-r• : 2: Pamela Park.' 0. , : 1 - 'st-t _ Fl r51-11A,AY t.;! • HERITnti.F c-11".1-1 Rosl and Park - FEl tv 1_1:1t1 Stfir f1T A NO 11P.AD , •-• 11 t: 1;ST •-• • 14:O.:EST .-1 : • STS•EF.7 FT L n:-.“311H S`TFIEFT WISE _ . III tirltiil" r!.:I - /0112 7...15.EETstiESt 2--2 ; t HA41101,1r...:1 1 2P41.1.1: '1',1:-.1C/, 7.1.5112,1-111'11 Wrs f " I ' .•. 72F:0:1- tVKI- — • - 11ET•WFT : • , Parcel 29-028-24-31-0009 ID: Map Scale: 1" 1600 ft. Print Date: 8/3/2015 A-T-B: Torrens Market Total: Owner Name: Parcel 3200 Southdale Cir Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Sale Type: Price: Home- stead: Non-Homestead Sale Date: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.63 acres Area: 27,414 sq ft Sale Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 Thirtk.Greent sn • C't, 4t Tax Total: Sale Price: AT-B: Torrens Market Total: Parcel ID: Owner Name: Parcel 3200 Southdale Cir Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Type: Frit IL 2EO . I 1 u-cAlvirtcli4ru L..,,t1_. , [ '-‘.-- -•••• , ' 3.016, ... . .,,I.. ra.-..-.. = .47.74 .-1. 3.1 Lifici),Ii. ,...._,.0,-- [ ), _n,11,A 1, Piq 1 3101. 321313; , 1,1 WM. 1,5645 4E44 Map Scale: 1" 200 ft. Print Date: 8/6/2015 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT @ HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 7111n1kGreen! Home- stead: Parcel 0.63 acres Area: 27,414 sq ft Sale Date: Sale Code: Map Scale: 1" 100 ft. Print Date: 8/6/2015 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT (i) HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A ThinkGre6ii: Parcel ID: Owner Name: Parcel Address: Property Type: Home- stead: Parcel Area: 29-028-24-31-0009 A-T-B: Torrens Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: ii 3 00 05 Mlles Legend LDS • Lan Panty R aldsnin MAP - Lon bensnOnasind IS sidereal MDR- Medi.° evils Resa.ntii 111 NOR. Density la endenial 111. NC- NnitinnhoulCommusial CR • Office Runenial RAI• Rag:anal titian - OW. OSP- Op. Spa. and Pais PaCC • Pin. Use Lenin ME MP- PainiVandPublo CAC • correntraymorry cuter LAN. UM. Acass flq*oir, lidiatnal 2 City of Edkoa 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS Figure 4.3 Future Land Use Plan ijoA•af o 4 dB& for living, learning, raising families & doing business S 2008 Compre—t-i—er 3lati Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4-25 /113/\ Legend LOH - Low Newly Residenhal OR- Chfice Resdertel WAR- LowDenhlyhIlwhed Reshialial 0- 0005 MDR- Medium Den* Residential I= LISC- Anted the Center FOR-FRgh10nelyReekOe01d MN CAC- CorrenunlyActhly Coder 699- 111681100990 Carrnetclal El 960101901 I I - Rational Mental MI OSP- 07961 Spate and P PSP-PubluSem-Puhlt IAS- INnledAccessligIstet Stli St Ii W 64th St 65th St p(kt)Pt6t" Height Limits 2 Stories: 24' 3 Stories: 36' 4 Stories: 48' 5 Stories: 60' 8 Stories: 95 9 Stories: 108' 10 Stories: 120' 12 Stories: 144' _In Standard Height I I Podium Height W 77119 St rn i ri q ton W 69911 SI 876th St W 76719 SI 12 2 OR Ain. eta De 10 j4 2 ALDR OR City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights Southeast Quadrant Figure 4.68 e Data Source: URS 05 Mies *Height may be increased to six stories if podium height is utilized on York and Xerxes subject to review and approval of the City Council. 11 7ok iN6 WILSON RD 8. EDEN AVE DETAIL ROTH Li FRANCE DETAIL 44TH 8. FRANCE DETAIL Zoning Map City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota SEE DETAIL UPPER LEFT VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE DETAIL SOUTHDALE DETAIL c_A_J CAHILL RD & 70TH DETAIL SEE DETAIL LOWER LEFT 54TH it FRANCE DETAIL F'S GRANDVIEW DETAIL 4, _ 71.117 SEE DETAIL LEFT CENTER Legend 874.8. POO POPP./ IPPP PPA = APO .Lo NM PIMA POPPAI OPPIP COMP MIA I €fla270B mon OTHE WEST EBTH STREET YORK Edina, MN JUL.30.20 1 5 INDEX RETAIL / OFFICE RESTAURANT • 3,800 GSF SALES OFFICE • 600 GSF OFFICE • 640 GSF 1112 504:1 4t, • Y6Itia ircp4,1K17741FA *AflhIIIIIII ath, rcti PARKING FIRST FLOOR • 97 STANDARD STALLS • 09 TANDEM STALLS LOWER LEVEL • 149 STANDARD STALLS • 07 COMPACT STALLS • 11 TANDEM STALLS 273 TOTAL PARKING STALLS SOUTHEDALE CIRCLE HOUSING 210 TOTAL HOUSING UNITS (70% 1BR'S - 30% 2 BR'S) SECONO FLOOR PLAN 1" = 401 architects Ce:30Gage Aof (cool+ po(racal Residential Redevelopment The Gateway Pointe West 66th &YORK Edina, MN Sketch Plan Review August 31, 2015 Revised: November 4, 2015 Project Narrative Developer: Prepared by: Bull Moose Construction Inc. 4999 France Avenue Ste. 200 Minneapolis, MN 55410 Kurt Krumenauer 612-229-0131 Collage Architects LLC 705 Raymond Ave, St. Paul, MN Pete Keely, AIA, 651-472-0051 3101 West 66th Street, 3200 Southdale Circle, 6612 Xerxes Ave. • Property The property is located on the Southeast corner of York and 66th, and is bounded by Xerxes and the City of Richfield to the East. The site was formerly a one-story commercial site housing a Best Buy Store. The site holds a tremendous opportunity to create a 'Gateway' into the City and the Southdale Area. The site consists of three parcels totaling 87,478 sq.ft. (2 acres). Two of the sites were used for the commercial property, the third is a single family lot. The three properties are located at 3200 Southdale Circle, 3101 66th Street West and 6612 Xerxes Avenue South. All have structures which are being proposed to be removed. • Project Summary: The proposed mixed-use building is comprised of 210 housing units with a high level of amenity spaces, and 258 parking stalls in two levels of structured parking. There is a commercial tenant space of 1760 sf that is planned to be a café' or coffee shop. The density on the 2 acres is approximately 105 units per acre. The housing will offer great amenities and a unique blend of units to meet the needs of an under-served and growing demographic. The project will be promoting alternative transportation choices with covered bike repair/storage rooms and a focused look at the pedestrian realm along the major intersection of York and W 66th. The site design will focus on walkability, public green spaces as well as a visual and physical connection to the building amenities. Residential walk up units will buffer the first floor parking along W 66th Street and Xerxes Avenue. • Market Vision: This location is a highly visible location with great access to goods, services, and transportation choices. We believe this will appeal to a wide-range of residents and can offer an upscale life style choice. The project intent is to provide an upscale apartment unit to meet the need of an underserved apartment market. Units will range in size to provide a variety of living choices and price points. Unit sizes will range from 650 square feet to 1600 square feet and higher with penthouse style units. The interior will have a high degree of amenities of common spaces including fitness, areas, community rooms and lounges for socializing and activities. The courtyards will be enhanced with outdoor amenity spaces, pools, terraces, gardens, grilling locations, and landscaped zones. The overall look of the building and the design is intended to appeal to this market. The unit price will be market rate with higher rents reflecting amenity adjacencies and overall size of the unit. • Land Use Principles / Building Design: The building design takes advantage of the long radius along York Avenue and will reinforce this curve throughout the design process. The mass of the building is located at this location to provide a unique 'Gateway' look to the intersection. This portion of the building will be developed with stone and glass to provide a fresh and unique look. The major amenities of the building are positioned at the apex of the curve of the intersection to act as marquee of activity for the project. The first level health and fitness center and a commercial café will anchor the corner. Adjacent to the community room on the second level is the pool deck and walking plaza. This south facing deck allows for the majority of the building mass to be concentrated along W 66th street. This opens up south facing courtyards to provide light, air and great amenity spaces for the residents, and to provide a transition to the smaller scale residential buildings toward the south. The mass in this location also limits the impact of shadows which predominately cover the street, and other commercial buildings. The west half of the building will have a separate look from the east half, giving more distinction between the buildings on this block. The west half of the building will be set on a podium height level to reduce the impact of the scale, and provide a transition to the neighborhood. The street edge of the development will be an enhanced pedestrian zone, and contain a linear park space along York. The linear park terminates in an outdoor terrace for the restaurant. This will provide an amenity to pedestrians, a great opportunity for a gateway expression of quality landscaping, and will raise the residential units above the street to provide greater livability. The units along W 66th and York will be developed as walk-up style units, providing vitality to the street. A small public pocket park is being proposed to the south to reinforce the easing of this transition and provide an accessible connection around the whole site. The project is anchored on the southwest corner is anchored by the amenity spaces. Parking is screened from the street by the building on three sides. Along the interior lot line the parking is screened with a wall. • Building Location, Massing and Height: The building is six stories: (70'-8") in height to sixth floor roof bearing. The pool plaza is 14' above the first floor parking and is one story along the south edge of the property. The western portion of the building has a one story podium. The eastern portion of the building is set above the street 5' with a stone landscape wall, pedestrian lighting and landscaping. The building massing at 6 stories is less than the 12 stories allowed across the street. The proposed massing for this intersection is intended to make a sensible transition to the developments to the south as well as being substantial enough to respond to the Gateway nature of the site and align with the city's long term vision for the area. The overall size of the building is 208,306 sf of residential space a residential FAR of 2.38. Residential parking Subgrade 60,609 First 37,197 SF 34,002 Second 34,481 SF Third 34,481 SF Fourth 34,481 SF Fifth 33,861 SF Sixth 33,805 SF Total sq.ft. 208,306 SF Total Parking sq.ft. 94,692 * Economic Impact This project will have a significant positive economic impact to the local area. Construction and operations spending along with resident spending will have a positive influence to the economic vitality of the area. Please see attached for addendum for economic benefits. * Public Realm — Landscape, Streetscape, and Open Space: The building is built to create a defined street edge along York, 66th and Xerxes. The design gives definition to the pedestrian circulation, but also has several areas of articulation to provide interest and additional landscape areas. The overall effect will provide for a varied look. The building is setback from York 8-30', from W 66th 15-25', and from Xerxes 15-25'. The first floor has all active spaces with a restaurant, fitness room, and units. All of these uses are raised above the level of the street. The front-yard areas are enhanced with stone retaining walls, landscaping, pedestrian lighting and front stoops. There is an open green space to the south that will contain passive recreation space and treated as a public pocket park for the neighborhood. • Transportation Alternatives: The Southdale Transit Center is across York and less than a 1/4 mile walk. There is also bus transit on the Northeast corner of the site serving the 515 bus. There are five bus lines served within approximately 1/4 mile from the site. • Pedestrian Circulation: The public realm is highly amenitized to encourage pedestrian movement. Internal circulation is directed toward the intersection of York and W 66th with additional spacing to encourage safe pedestrian movement. • Bicycle: There will be bicycle parking for each unit. Additionally the building will be developed with bicycle amenities to promote bike ridership. A dedicated bike enclosure/repair is being provided on the southeast corner of parking level I. There will also be secure and dedicated interior bike storage. Exterior bike racks will also be provided for visitors, and restaurant patrons. • Traffic Access The building is accessed from two points. The main access and Front-door' is located off Southdale Circle. This entrance will be the front entry for the residential complex, and will access the amenity spaces, the offices and the residential units. Trash and delivery access will also occur at this location off Southdale Circle through the underground garage. The second access is located on Xerxes. This access point has been located further north than the original proposal and is nearly at the location of the currently existing curb-cut. This access point is directly across from a commercial property. The development team will be hiring a traffic engineer to help us solidify the best locations for access. We will continue to work with the engineers and the city to identify the most appropriate and safe locations. • Parking: The project consists of two levels of structured parking, both of these levels are screened from so that the parking is not visible from the street. The first level comprises visitor access and residential parking. The upper level of parking is essentially on grade and will have skylights, and openings for natural light providing a suitable experience for this type of development. The second parking level is private for the residential units. There are a total of 268 parking stalls. • Storm Water Management: Storm-water will be collected on site and used on-site to the extent possible. The linear park along 66th and York will be designed to accept the on-site run-off in a demonstration area for best management principles for storm water. Courtyard amenity spaces will also be designed to collect and re-use rain water as possible. • Sustainability: The project by it's nature of a redevelopment on an existing site surrounded by infrastructure and transit is sustainable by location and type. The project will provide the following green features: All of the common lighting will be LED, provide a high efficiency lighting solution; increased insulation and thermal envelop above code; energy-Star rated appliances; recycled storm water for irrigation, low/ no VOC paints and primers and adhesives. • Actions: The development team is requesting the following: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Rezoning all three propertiesto Planned Unit Development (PUD) • Site Plan Approval • Re-platting the three parcels into one parcel Changes from the Sketch Plan, and original submission: • The restaurant has been reduced in size to 1760 square feet. This space will be a café' — coffee shop. The parking required to make the restaurant viable would have necessitated a second level of underground parking. The cost of this parking would need to have been paid by the restaurant. This extra cost Would have been a competitive disadvantage, and would have significantly harmed the chances for a successful restaurant. Which in turn could have stressed the entire project. We wanted to make sure the anchor corner was filled with activity not empty storefront. The café' will provide public access, vitality and amenity at the corner. A A • The trash and delivery has been moved to an internal access point. Without the restaurant the trash needs were reduced and easier to move into the parking structure. This will provide a better first floor experience At Southdale Circle. • The first floor of the Southwest corner has been cut back to provide an outdoor terrace area for residents. This terrace is in conjunction with an indoor community room / café' for residents and will provide activity along this corner. • The linear park along York and 66' has been extended. This pedestrian walkway will provide a safer and better public pedestrian experience along 66' and York. This sidewalk is public the full length and setback further from the road for a better pedestrian experience. • Affordable Units have been added to the project and will represent 5% of the total. • A plinth level has been added to the east, and north east side. Changes from the original planning commission submittal. • The access on Xerxes has been relocated toward the north. This location is closer to the current access point. The new location is across from a commercial property and not a residential property. The development team is engaging a traffic engineer to assist with locations of access, and will work with the city to identify safe locations. • Located on the northern portion of the street the property is mostly located next to commercially zoned properties. Podium Height was added to the east side where it abuts the residential property. • The building on the western 'gateway' portion will consist of stone glass and metal, and will be a warmer color. • Additional drawings show the possible configuration of sidewalks and landscape areas along the sidewalk. • A podium height has been added along the north and east. • The proposed height and density are necessary to provide amenities as noted below. • PUD: The proposed project is requesting a PUD. Through the PUD process we are asking for additional height and density and offering additional items as outlined in the PUD ordinance below: A. Provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; • The proposed use is for higher density residential mixed-use. The residential use appears to be consistent with the intent and vision for the properties in Edina. The adjacent properties in Richfield are also zoned for mid-density residential, so the proposed project appears to be consistent with the vision of both cities. • The project incorporates pedestrian friendly design which appears to be consistent with the overall vision of this area. • The buildings are placed to create a consistent 'street wall' to define the sidewalk and enhance the pedestrian realm. • The project offers a mixed-use building with the commercial café at the first floor. B. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; • The proposed use bring economic vitality to this underutilized site. The project brings construction jobs, along with additional employment for running the apartment, while providing new homes for residents. • The gateway vision, the linear park, and the Xerxes green space provide increased comfort, aesthetics, and promotes pedestrian use leading to better welfare of the city and residents. C. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, storm-water management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses. • The height variance allows for more of the space to remain open for use by the residents with new open space, and amenity. It also allows for the ability to leave the parcel to the south open as a park. The project was designed to locate the height and mass to the north side to allow the active spaces to be located in south facing courtyards providing a better transition to the southern neighbors, and a more useable environment for the residents. • The project is designed to make a statement as the gateway into the city. Part of this gateway is embracing pedestrian use. The northwest curve is designed as a linear park to enhance pedestrian use with quality materials and design. • This linear park is intended to use recaptured on-site water as a demonstration of storm- water management. • The linear park will also provide enhance lighting as a means to create the gateway effect, and provide pedestrian safety. • A podium height level has been added along Xerxes. D. Ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; • The proposed project creates a gateway statement and high quality of design for this gateway location. The design is enhanced by promoting a strong pedestrian experience and statement along York, and the use of high-quality materials, openness, glass, and active uses at this gateway location. • The uses are consistent and compatible with the area, and surrounding land uses being a mix of commercial and residential. E. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; • The proposal provides for a greatly enhanced sidewalk, and pedestrian zone along York and 66th. This improves the public street right of way for pedestrians. The project has a sidewalk link south of the building connecting Xerxes and Southdale Circle through the pocket Park on the south east. F. Preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; • A new green space is provided in the proposal with the purchase of residential lot to the south. This green space will be open for public use, and provides additional trees, and open space for Xerxes. • The site currently does not have any natural distinguishing features. G. Allow for mixing of land uses within a development; • The project is mixed-use with a commercial retial space and outdoor patio at first floor. • The project is a mix of user types, and incomes within the residential apartments H. Encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and • The project is an apartment with a variety of unit types including walk-up style units and rents. • 5% of the units are affordable. I. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. a The majority of the height and density is pushed to the northern portion of the site to ease the transition to the southern properties. The restaurant is planned adjacent to the other commercial properties to the south. This project has acquired the residential property on the southeast side to provide a transition to the residential neighborhood to the south and east, and is working on acquiring the last remaining property on that side of the street. Currently the properties to the north, northwest, and west are guided for up to 12 stories. The properties to the east are zoned for mid density residential. This project at 6 stories is a good transition between the higher zoning allotment to the north and west, and the smaller to the east. The proposed project would meet the following city goals and policies: Provide economic vitality and a positive economic impact. The project will have a strong influence on the vitality in the neighborhood through construction, operation and resident spending. Encourage infill / redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood and corridor context. The proposal is a redevelopment site utilizing existing utilities, and infrastructure, and defines this transit corridor with the building location, massing, and streetscape development. • Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city and the larger region. Residential units support and enhance the existing businesses and commercial services and support economic vitality. • Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. The project develops a strong linkage of sidewalks, and enhances those sidewalks to improve the pedestrian experience. Bicycle facilities will be provided in the development. Transit service is nearby with the bus transit station across the street, and bus stop on site. These transit options together with this location so close to goods and services can help minimize the dependence on the car. • Building walls are placed to form a consistent street wall, and oriented to encourage and support pedestrian movement toward transit. On existing auto oriented sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. Locate Buildings to define corners and screen parking lots. The building is placed to define the corners, especially this gateway curve, and through its placement screens the parking. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life: streets that are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity generating uses. Pedestrian amenities have been enhanced with walls, benches, lighting and landscaping. These sidewalks, and their public nature have been reinforced with common residential uses such as the fitness and community rooms. A restaurant adds to the street vitality. Walk-up style units also give the street and the sidewalk life and vitality. The entire project has connected uses on the ground floor to help encourage use, and vitality of the public realm. • Within corridors served by transit, orient buildings toward sidewalks and paths that lead to destinations and transit stops. The Building entries face the street, and apartment units have walk-up entries that face the street. Residential amenities and common areas are strongly linked to the sidewalk, and pedestrian movement is encouraged to go toward the sidewalk system and transit. • The proposed project is requesting additional density and height to be able to provide the type of development fitting of this gateway site. The cost of development on this site is high. In order to provide a project that is appropriate for this gateway site the project needs the additional density to make it viable. Some of the factors leading to additional costs. • Affordable units • Pedestrian Oriented Design • Walk-Up style units • Additional green space that is incorporated into a public use park. • Greatly defined gateway statement that enhances the public realm/ • Incorporating a mix of uses with the café'. • The oddly shaped curve of the site. • Height is appropriate in this location • The site is on the norther edge of the block minimizing shadow impacts on neighbors. • The properties to the north are guided for up to 12 stories, the newly proposed project to the south is six stories, and the properties in Richfield are zoned for mid-density residential. This site is appropriate at six stories between these sites. • The height is needed for adequate unit size and ground floor amenities with open space. • Density is appropriate in the location • Goods and services are conveniently located as recognized in the current Community Activity Center Designation. • The site is near mass transit with one bus stop on the north east corner, and the transit station less than 1/4 mile walk. • The proposed project includes amenities and open spaces for the residents. • The uses and vision in the nearby locations all have higher densities, and the zoning in Richfield identifies mid-level density indicating an overall vision of increased density. • Density is needed to provide enough economic vitality to build a high-quality building and site amenities. • Suitability: The project provides a great re-use of this site to a higher and better use. This use will provide great homes for new Edina residents, and provide vitality and economic impact to this gateway location in the Southdale redevelopment area. Please see attached for addendum for economic benefits. Working Principles for the District: Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district principles. • The proposal provides a mix of residents through a mix of housing types including affordable housing. • The project is mixed-use. • The site is a redevelopment site that is not nearly the best and highest use for this location. The proposed development turns an empty one-story commercial building in a highly used commercial corridor into a vital project that provides economic impact, and residents to the city. These residents will support the goods and services with the outcome of greater and more diverse economic impact. • The inclusion of the residents along with the additional housing development in this area will begin to make a neighborhood that can provide opportunities for more businesses, and more commercial development along with supporting the existing. This increased residential use and the creation of a neighborhood will have a cumulative effect to create an economic base, and asset to the city and a great place to live. • The proposal is providing an enhanced pedestrian realm in the linear and pocket park, and better walking connections to support the residential development in the district, and promote a walkable neighborhood. Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. • The proposed project will be two levels of concrete construction with wood frame construction. The exterior materials include a large proportion of stone at the main intersection, and a masonry base. Cement board and metal panel is also used throughout the project with a large percentage of glass. This is a foreground building intended to make a statement at the gateway intersection. This idea is enhance with the use of materials, the enhanced public realm in the linear park, and the overall aesthetic. • The first floor has a commercial use that is accessible to the public. This café' use has an outdoor terrace as a main component to add to the pedestrian experience and provide an amenity to the commercial users and the community that patronizes the café'. • Housing will always be a strong and necessary component of the community. This proposal will also provide a dignified pedestrian experience, and ease of access around the building that will be welcomed for years to come. • Human activity is highlighted in many ways in the building. On the eastern half the residential units include walk-up style housing connecting people to the pedestrian realm. The western half highlights the amenity spaces and is visible from the public streets. This includes a café/ commons area, an outdoor terrace, and a community room. Also visible will be the two-story space that connects to the upper level amenities. We expect this area to have a high degree of vitality and be busy throughout the day. • The development promotes economic vitality through the creation of construction jobs, on-site apartment management jobs, and provides residents to support the retail and commercial users that are within close walking distance to the their homes. • The building is adaptable to change over time. The design and construction is such that if additional commercial or retail is desired at the ground floor in the future it could be accommodated in the fitness, café' commons and terrace area. This could also work with the parking as provided. So over time the ground floor could adapt to a commercial entity. Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward- looking infrastructure sustaining the district. • The building is located on a site with connections to the existing infrastructure including sewer, water, electric, gas, transit, and pedestrian networks. The project relies on these systems to create a viable project. The storm water will be designed is a way that will provide for on-site irrigation to the extent possible. • The project will require access to the existing infrastructure and will have a slight impact. In terms of transit and pedestrian access the projects impact will help the existing resources by providing more riders, and providing better pedestrian connections. The development will tie into the existing utilities and have a slight impact on those systems. The users in the project will support the existing businesses nearby. • The development will support the existing transit infrastructure with increased ridership. Aj Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating movement of people within and to the district. • The proposal provides a park on the southwest corner, and a sidewalk to connect from Xerxes to York allowing greater pedestrian connectivity, and a better experience with the park. • The proposal adds a second sidewalk along the York and 66' curve that creates a more inviting, and safe sidewalk than the currently exists. The existing narrow walk just behind the curb is awkward and dangerous, especially in winter conditions. The new walk pushed back from the curb with landscaping allows greater safety and separation from the car, and a better pedestrian experience. • The linear park has activity along the edge, and the pocket park is capable of having activity, both of which provide an amenity to the public realm, as well as providing interest and safety with more eyes on the street. • The residential nature of the building, and the walk-up units provide better human connection to the public realm and enhance overall safety by providing more eyes on the street. Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without "leftover" spaces on sites. • The mass and the scale of the building are pushed toward the northern part of the site. The northern portion of the site abuts a commercial district, and is guided for up to twelve stories. The building at six stories with the mass toward the north provides a transition from the commercial into the residential neighborhood. • On the south eastern corner a park is included to transition the building into the single family neighborhood. • The eastern portion of the building has been designed with a podium to reduce the impact of the height by creating a smaller impact on the ground floor. • The proposal makes full use of the site. Where the building is not located the site is developed into the linear park, or the pocket park to the south. Where the residential units are not located at the second floor the site is developed into an amenity space for the residents in two courtyards. These courtyards transition the activity and scape toward the residential neighbors to the south. All of the site has been designed with activity and connections to create deliberate zones of use for residents, amenities, recreation, or transition so there are no left-over spaces. Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves. • The proposal provides for healthy living for the residents with a high degree of amenity space including the fitness room, and the pool and terrace area. • The proposed project enhances the pedestrian realm promoting safety and connectivity for ease of pedestrian use which in turn promotes walking as a healthy alternative for the public in the area and the residents. • The massing of the project screens the activity, noise and pollution of the street from the residential neighborhood to the south, and the activity zones of the courtyard and the pocket park. Promote well-balanced aggregations of "come to" and "stay at" places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. • The proposal supports adjacent businesses and commercial areas by providing residents in close proximity that will support the businesses. • The proposed use as housing is 'stay-at' place. Residents are an anchor to the community, this will be their home. • These residents will use a variety of 'come-to' places nearby such as the commercial uses at Southdale Mall, and the commercial district all around the project. • Residential use generates activity throughout the day. There is generally more movement to and from a development like this before and after work. We expect that many of the residents will use transit, and the transit hub across the street to commute. This will have a flow of people along the sidewalks at commuting times. We would expect many of the residents to drive cars. During the work week these cars will come and go all day with higher concentration during morning and evening commutes. A traffic study is being prepared to determine this in greater detail. Most traffic studies show that residential use is well-dispersed even during the concentrated times as individual residents have a wide-variety of lifestyle patterns. This is even more true on the weekends where people come and go regularly. The amenity spaces will have their greatest use during the weekend times, and during traditional non-work hours. Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. • The proposed project provides economic impact through the development and construction jobs it creates, as well as the jobs for the sales staff and team that runs the development. • The residents will support the business in the district, and support the economic vitality. Residents generally support business close to their home, thus providing residents in this location with a multitude of goods and services will greatly enhance the economic vitality for existing business, and potential new business. • The proposed project designs for the main entry to be at the location closest to the intersection and pedestrian access to the nearby businesses. The main elevator bank is located with direct access through the lobby, and in very close proximity to the pedestrian intersection. This not only promotes pedestrian use, but also promotes support of the nearby businesses. In addition, the proposal creates amenity space along the first and second floor as a draw to residents toward the public-realm and toward the street toward the adjacent businesses. This provides for more activity and interest along the way, and hopeful encourages resident's use of the public-realm to access local business in the district. • This residential proposal creates density, vitality and residents along a significant commercial corridor while replacing an underutilized one story commercial building. The density and use greatly increase the economic impact. The density is also needed to make this project viable and to provide for the amenities to create a great pedestrian realm and signature building that creates the gateway and helps define the district as a great place to stay-at or come to. This redevelopment will have great economic impact over the whole district with the redevelopment of this currently underutilized site on such a prominent intersection. L 51* X: \a O I5 \ 1 5 O 1 1 2 \ u n ey \ is tn g c o n dit io n s \ 1 5 01 4 '2E 2345 • L VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGAL DESCRIPTION lmt 1. Bloolt1.501.1711PAI. YOFINADOITON out 11. NUMBER.. 71.44C7 WM BIM VOPX.AACE lees. Mannpen County. MInnesol. NOTES ICOFE ..rnInitnn nt nn.1.2/004....nninlA No.1, d.I.dO...Ct.fltOrnO. 2. Tn. /nollan. of und.rproynd U11.• clerna Mad en Inlermation IronlOophoa Sts. One sy.m lor • 13ountlary3unny Warns,. I... C Mdbyenn.n.on noartts boollen. ms, nal 1..1.1.,01,1I crIllostie conanueton cloolgn. Em. CIMSn of Ns b.nnit systwn is b.. MS fl. County Con.. By.rn COMM. toortleulem 4. All glistenemo an in log, The am. al si,s download prow, Is ea.070 opu.r. bmn or 2.o.:«rms. Pong.111.11 CI, al Celn. annenrrvirk 1St 4. top nut el hydrant local. an the soul.. cormn 9:50 We. [101.11.1 nn Munn al On1.211.NOVON. LEGEND TWA& NORTH LINE OF SW 0 wroomeohossorr Ions • rows MX $0.404 X Imwar p me. mums“ DCMOMMM gkk ono. wegAr rark orle we, cEss oso. oun Ont. w.44“ 174= 8 mass. 4-114 INEEMISESI rYY-y-y OO 2000024410002 132 =VA I 3I"W LI23:16 233 Park Ave S. Ste 300 Minn./polls, MN 55415 I hereby comMyS r I Amoy, plass/awn Zp's7=71:=:.'t :Is, um's, rhs ems arr. sten al ) 612.758.3080 066 612.758.3099 kw ALL IANT www.3111ant-Inc.c013 ...... IN• 5.N4 a OLMSTEAD lOT COM.. 7 511.11/011te 0n1* Lbw. Numbs, BEST BUY DRAWN BY OPAL CHECKED BY 0 IN 201 BO DATE 149.0 3101 55TH STREET WEST SCA. SO LE IN FEET EDINA. MINNESOTA JOB NO. 1,3) BOON 12, RT PIECE PERENNIALS, TYR. TECO GE TREE. GE. DECIO. SMALL TREE. PIP. EVERGREEN TREE. TIT. e EVERGREEN SHRUB. TIP. CD GEOID. SHRUB 10E. O PERENNIAL. PIP. ANNUAL. TYP. I www.callarmerch.com IT HYDRANGEA TITTEUOHT 79. CONC. MAINT. ONE RETAINING WAI 110) ELM 'VA, 1.1, FORGE' 2.5 ,1 re - asmiliorar, 41111" 411111, THE GATEWAY POINTE 3101.10011100eel MIrompells.MN, SODAS OAR IT 4,8 NI CRABAPPLE 'SPA 010115. SHRUB, PLP EVERGREEN. SHRUB, WP. ID' sLA EFIENNIALS. EGO. JUROR, TYE. OECD. SHRUG TM EVERGREEN. SHRUB, TY, POOL A HOT TO D BLVD. IHRICIATED ROPERTY CORNEA NA, ,scamumm litionek miviwinin= •T'LZE°.",,IV,T4 Ittr.01151.t9,1. te4r-1"agrfti*rit4 21 RIVER LIIRCH '.--111111— /ANTI'S! _ AlairA I 1641 'ACHED COMA. WT V r.".= ." 0._ 111111 TREE CRETE ONC, PAYERS 8' SEAT WALL T J L LLL1.1 0n 111.1 VMS 'ENTIIELIC TURF PUTTING GREENS orrs-ir,A Warti OD KALI SERVICE PRY 'AUT. BRILL' STONE/ BANNER 113 TONE SEAT) 0E100000 WAG_ PROPERTY CORSE STONE/ BANNER( LIGHT PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN. SEE 3/L100 MAPLE 'AUTUMN FiLAZEI 7 OD BL . GATED • TONE SEAT/ RETAININ ALI C011•he 1 ArchlteerA b.e. landschne eleAlgns, He L.9999.979 12111 Alt. N., MI BUIS 0) VIROINIA CREEPER VINES WINER TO WALL EGO. SHRUB. TAP.. VERGREEN. SHRUB, TYP. 1 SI BLUE BEECH. CLUMP, MIST. AT swiSS STONE PINE ROPER, CORNER 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN ELM VALLEY FORGE. (A-.) MOATS SIDE 0E11105 sate.. BLVD 0*- 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND 8 1—" 'PROJECT RA'N0E10 MOUNTED _412,E15ESTONE .sAvit4 1.11...LESTONE 1,I.ROJECT SION T • 11012111 LIMESTONE ISILLIECT SION BABE PROJECE SIGNAGE STAIR h STOOP C WALA IE RETAINING WALL DATE: OCTOBER 12, 2015 CITY SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 30, 2015 tn\t‘CAPE PLAN Ll 00 CONE STRIP I. AU gmmitlei. seem 01 0*, ale locatiom Mall be vellfled and adjusted as nem. to conform to Me erect conditions of the Me. Reaew tr.capo anallect P. M 01.2. 2. Loote all Rte., DIM.. Irrigation Does, with the Omer. 1000$ 00 Landscape .M11.o, any Mel!. tOS,dIlIOta plant relocation. Contractor shell be reimenible Mr the reser of my dams. to same. 3. Tbe Can../ shall Co responsible for compile. ..1 all app.. 000,0, regulations and.. Veen. the W P. lee Contractor shall be texpornele for all mulches and Man.. (MI tiMleitim to complete Om met shown an . plan. Verily all limmtithe 'h.', on . plant schedule. 5. The Contractor Hell terrme free tre Me all soditurTwhica he .11 removed far nee plant beds. Lonetene Mora., of matetrals or supplies on...I not be all.ed. /my plant s.k not plAnted on day of delver/ shall be heeled In and Wate..1.1ollistlon. PIA. not maintained In this .nnor MU be 6. ThaC0000o000000IlA0005n00000,pI001aTS.P104IIAITRI 10,0,04 untrained. All waste shall be pionetly reme. from the Me. Any da.ge misting facilities shall be .eired at the Contractor's expense. 7. TSR plan tem precedence over Me pent sthedule If discrepencles 00100 The specilicatiorn tee preCerleime mei Me plmting no. and geneini no.. B. Anind pH of wie Iron Sulfate. B. N0 000000U0000 01 00100 material, shall 10 ,000.014 unless approved In waging by No lane.. architect ID. All planting stock shall conform M the 'American Standard for NurserY Shell ANSI. latest eetico. of Me ITS toll AssocIatIon of *000,001, 0. 11. All Manta shall be imam.. for Oil(E YEAR from the date of substential completion tele05 othemoise smelled. Ole Gene. shall cover the full cost of replecement, Including trier and pla.. ID. Seasons/Time of Planting) Sprint) April 15th. lune 30. Aumst 15th. Nov 15th PLANTING NOTES 0 spa. 'as legni no Contractor may Ned lo plan. the offeeasons entiretr hls/Mr 13. Peeing soli for tree sliMb plbi By volume, Mx I /2 neUve vells wIM 1 /2 Imported planlim mils. See spem. IX. Pentire NM fa ATM and pen.. Ismix Thome. mixed In enua porb by volume, /3 emended tom.. 1/3 wee. mr. lel pea501 orpnic compost. .s mem. 15. Frac. ell comp.. Mts. See SC Decompactlon Notes IS. !Motion mstern. Need.. 01011 be fully me.. and teital st the Um 00 01000115. Nen fInt moon. mometor MO mon. molsture Don.. and adjust in.00 as neeried to swAd over end under waterlog of Pent meter. MOM ...mem 17. WO: IANN OWN, Areckled hardwood rm1050 dem and free of noxious mods, WI, ate other deletereus enterial. Use 100 .11 tree pee. and aim all pl.. beds for shillbs and perennels. Deliver mulch on planlinit day and mild all lepte. Mien hours of Installanon. Use . folicneng 0.110: 4 Inches for treev, Sloth., for 00,45,, 01,05,0 for permeate PULL MULCH AWAY FROM THE TRUNKS AND STE. OF ALL PLANT mama. 16. .itrenence Mel begin Immediately at. each Roe. of the twirl, Is In plam. Plent materials ONO be protect. and mentaln. Me ...Ion of all plants incomplete Inspection Ms tem ine. and Me planting accept. exclusive of Me menet. ...Nee shall Inc. wateil.....11. pron. and removal or dmd material, and lemIng the planlx in a plumb posiNon. A. acceptance, the mixer MO assume maintenance responsibilities. The Contractor Mall menmln mi.., In aplomb WINONA for Ole duration of Me guarantee pee. 10. Contractor Mel requert In ...D. otraPtroltre 20. GAM.. fabric Mall non.. under mulch. Shrub and perennial emi Mall have spaded edges unimsplam Indium AMAGvhc. 14firVAI. TRW OUT WIDEN a DEAD STEMS OHM PULL Wax AWAY FROM ALL 01100 10 pREVERT ROTIINO. DEPTH. D. SHREDDED HARDW000 MULCH. MNISHED GRADE PLANTING SOIL. SEE SPEC. XARIEly 00170M AND SIDES OF PLANTING HOLE. UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILS SHRLIS PLANTING DETAIL SCALE. HIS OTtO 1111: GUY ASSEHOLY NOT MANDATORY BUT, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TREE IN A PLUMB POSMON FORME DURATION OFTHE ONE YEAR GUARANTEE PERIOD. GUY ASSEMBLY: NO POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYMMNE hIOMILI 1.1 tr WIDE STOP- (TYR.) DOUBLE MANI) 14 GA SDE ST STEEL MAXIS OR SION POSTS 0. 110 DEG. 0.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM). COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIFORM ORIENTAION OF GUY LINES AND STAKES. 110 DEG. STARING DIAGMM AFTER INSTALLATION. 71110 OUT DEADWOOD AND/OR DEFORMED WAGS. DO NOT CUT LEADER. NOTES: 1) CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE VON PIN THE ROOT FLARE OF EACH TREE PRIOR TO DIGGING THE PLAN71NG PIT, THE FLARE IS T. TAAMMON 10NE BE7WEEN THE MAIN STEM MOINE ROOT SYSTEM.) DI REMOVE SOIL FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL TO GPOSE TOP OF FLARE. TREES VATH MORE THAN r OE EXCESS SOIL ABOVE TIE FLARE MILL aE REJECTED. MEASURE DIM. 0EI01EE1 FLARE AND BOTTOM OF ROOTH.. SUISTRACTIOSTO DETERMINE DEPTH OF PUNTING PIT. 31 DIG DOTE DEPTH DETEROHNED ABOVE. PIT SHALL BE DISHED WM1SIDEVIALLS AS SHOWN BELOW. SCARIFY WALLS AND BOTTOM OF PIT. 4.1 337 TREF 10 PIT SO THAT RARE IS ONETWO INCH. ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. 5) IN ALL AREAS WITH HEAVY CLAY CIR POORLY DRAM. SOILS IMOMINGI, CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TREE MAY BE RELOCATED OR ROMBALL FUMER ELEVATE13. RODENTTRUNit PRMECI1ON: CORRUGATED POLYMNYENE DRAIMGE PIPE SUT VERTICALLY OR, /71 HARNARE.CLOTH MESH CYLINDER. DIMENSIONS; 11 D.LTER (OR GREATER) X 361HGT. SEE SPECMCATION TARE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH - DEPTH X 5 FT 01ADIFTER NULL AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREE BACMILL MTH 1 /2 NATIVE SOILS AND 114 PLANING SOIL. mIX TIVOROUGHLY. SEE SPEC. AFTER srmNo ROOT BALL HIM, BACKFILL TO WITHIN I • OETOP OF ROOTIMIL AND SATURATE WMI WATER. .CUT AND REMOVE TO MIMIC UNE ALL TWIHE, WIRE AN13/011 BURLAP. .BACIMILL LIMO PIT IS FULL, WATER AGAIN. STAKES AND GUY WIRES • SEE NOM SELO. RARE. PETIT 1..2. ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. SEE NOTE ABOVE UGH PLANTING NT SCARIFY 001100 *00 SIDES OF PT LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE INSPECTION 011110 LANDSCAPE Aitogrra +a HOURS PRIOR TO PLACING MULCH AROUND THE TREE PLANNNGS. UNDISTURBED 501100 CCPAPACTED 01101000 1111011111111111 .eleetv §1,1101! CD TREE PLANING DETAIL SCALE), NTS TUFFS WM BE REACTED MR THE FOLLOVANG ROGOW MOOR FORM MANAGED TRUNK MURIED ROOT MARES .ERCIRCLINO TRANSPORT ROOTS MKOMSoLIDATED ROOTOALL SOIL (DUE TO EXCESSIVE KANDUNGI NOTES: I. LOCATE fLARE OF TRUNN P0100 10 IICAVATING PUNTING PIT. REMOVE ROOTIALL MIL TO WOW TOP OF FLARE. AFTER SETTING ROCITDALL IN PLANTING PIT, RFNOVE ALL NON.BIODEGRABLE WRAP MATERIAL AND/OR CORD. BACIOILL POMO DEM AND WATER THOROUGHLY. CUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM TOP I-OF BURLAP AND SWINE. COMPLETE DACHEILLING AHD WATER WEER SATURATED. MULCH TO a. DEMI ON DAY OF PLANTING. J. OUT ASSEMBLY IS OPTIONAL, HOWEVER CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILM FOR MAINTAINING TREE IN UPRIGHT 101/71011 FOR THE DURATION 01 1110 GUARAWEE PERIOD. 4.0100 INSTALLATION, TRIM OUT DEAD OR REFORMED MATERIAL DO NOT PRUNE CENTRAL LEADER. aPTILA__.4 L. GUY MARES smi ec 1.01A. Gla. STEEL GBLE. WIRES SHALL A1TACH TO 21 WIDE !NOON /AM SLINGS AROUND TREE TRUNX. SLINGS SMALL BE PLACED A MIN. 0E7 UP Met OF TREE. GUY WIRES SHALL OE SET INTO GROUND WiTHINICXBILI EARTH ANCHOR OR APPROVED EQUAL. "-hit 5. 1k: Ar DARR SHREDDED HARDY/DUO MULCH PLANTING PIT SHALL BE TWICE THE .TH OF IHE ROCITHALL. SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING PIT. TEAL NATWE SOILS 0 EVERGREEN PLANTING DETAIL SGLEr NTS TRIM OUT BROM & DEAD STEMS ONLY. SPACE PLANTS ACCORDING TO PLANT SCHEDULE. 31 DARN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH PLANTING SOIL (1 .00T M77.2 SELECT BORROW TORSO', COMPOST • I CLEAN WASHED SAND). SEE SPEC. SCARIFY DOTI. AND SIDES CIF PLANTING HOLE UNDIMMED NATIVE SOILS. 0 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE. NTS Alk.ICICITY SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 30, 2015 4 etre ,tre nl WO/C r‘cT0 # VANDSCAPE DETAILS 1200 OCTOBER RB, $015 I00 00110 1,0100001 00 C .00 0' 000 00000000 COOMIOLOOIN 0.111116.161 WI WO ROM. 17 PRELANARY PLANT SCHEDULE SGLE. NTS www.collagenrchsom THE GATEWAY POINTE 3101 WM 6116155100 Dievapeiv Al N. 5511S Pam: mos I ro rWIT Z:3 Zit 313.046.33A. Col.g. I 0005013.. 0.111Not :07.:;t:000 11111 aaaaa AWN./ •11. Mlimovels 311.• 14m111.. Npla, WEST 66TH STREET THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 -7v ita SOUTHDALE CIRCL ve° AERIAL OVER 1170Hage I architects WEST 66TH STREET THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina. MN OCT.30.201 5 z.",,,<1•04-11 edr I / 4 * At /4 4 I. 1 • __1.___.___.._ :11111,_Irt7- 411 p.:....: , . inuros Anirrvir, Illi if lip n, -- ipoirr.-.-m- r 1 11W JL -wa •E -"-- i - i pill mminHnuuaunouonmmimmsmwii 44frAg SOUTHDALE CIRCLE .0411 0' 5 20' 90' ohitects 40' 0-) 01 SITE PLAN WEST SETH STREET THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 MC I I I I I 1'1-1.'1 111111 TOPACE LI El 152 STALLS +16 TANDEM MECH. I TI SOUTHDALE CIRCLE t e LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1" 0' 5 20' 40' 6txsc.syr- 190 WEST 66TH STREET THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT. 30.2015 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE N ° FIRST FLOOR PLAN lO e — 35' rt% 90' c.;\ 05' 20 40' 6C4 ° cb 1" = 35' 90' SOLJTHDALE CIRCLE j a r Lects SECOND FLOOR PLAN 05' 20' 40' WEST SETH STREET , :11 1 OR 691 I —At • • I= • • • • IM MIIIM111111111111111•MIIIMIMIMII IMMINMENIIM n 1 BR 600 ROO N1 1 BR 825 MI NI' • • • 11 Ina gorrviri r irru .70,Ei M EPA Pp MEM -, migii-•••• • um MO 288 2DB VIIM MIll• ' NM MI1 .... li NE Imil••••••••maiiiiimummmumma..•••••••' 1.... THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 WEST 66TH STREET THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE THIRD FLOOR PLAN 'I" = 0' 5 20' 40' ov WEST 66TH STREET SOUTHCIALE CIRCLE FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 0' 5 20' 40' .1 11 THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 1 OR eel SOUTHCIALE CIRCLE :111age architects (t) FIFTH FLOOR PLAN 1" = 35' 05' 20' 40' 90' WEST 66TH STREET en BOO •,°z THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 SIXTH FLOOR PLAN 1" = 35TV- 0' 5 20 40' go WEST 66TH STREET THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE otc THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT 30.2015 otb N‘l IAVA VIEW cia 46"\ Collage j arc nitects ock —NW THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 WEST vall/V 9 OC. architects 6c 1 THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 4r, on. • 4, 4 4. •11* imenwiri "MOM NORTHWESIEW oc *4$16* ° THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 9-) 111 EAST VIE1/1(‘# 1?\Y- THE GATEWAY SOUTH Vrii) Z;oiiage I architects 14 03 13 02 04 09- -08 10 02 07 03 THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201E 06 CEMENTITIOUS SIDING 07 CEMENTITIDUS PANEL 08 SLIDING GLASS DOORS 09 ALUMINIUM DECK/RAILING 10 GLASS RAILING 11 PREFIN. METAL CANOPY 12 PREFIN. METAL TRELLIS 13 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 14 VINYL WINDOW NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING ELEVATIONS 1" = 35' 0' 5' 20' 40' 90' Collage I architects A4aterial Index 7424'44' 02 CAST STONE 03 PREFIN. METAL #1 04 PREFIN. METAL #2 05 PREFIN. METAL #3 (P071.11,11) • .07 -.10 -04 -08 -03 -07 -14 .-07 -03 -.13 EAST ELEVATION 01 03 04 -11 -01 -13 --13 -10 "05 "04 •• 10 - L 11 iIi Mafia.. Minna Eji r- it I! 117 iiii;uiii ;;j - i! II II liii II TIT: /ESE! RINI! e ralMORI L. IBM" IN I -I I" 1,11. ut r 6 a EMI • a _ NMI MB MI iiiiiI :!Ii P! ZEIN _ Pi q 9 ALL'0 !! !! !! , in8N8111111 •11 -02 -13 -11 TCP or TOP TOPPI. IIO-O la• or TOPPING 01 LANDSCAPE STONE -.05 .03 04 01 -01 -11 -11 -13 -02 THE GATEWAY -14 •• 14 • 07 -OB -09 -07 07 13 04 POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.2015 Material Index E-Vro 02 CAST STONE 01 LANDSCAPE STONE WEST ELEVA BUILDING ELEVATIONS 0'5' 20' 40' 03 PREFIN. METAL #1 04 PREFIN. METAL #2 05 PREFIN. METAL #3 Eis 06 CEMENTITIOUS SIDING 07 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL 08 SLIDING GLASS DOORS 09 ALUMINIUM DECK/RAILING 10 GLASS RAILING - - 11 PREFIN. METAL CANOPY TOP Or SOFLOOR 12 PREFIN. METAL TRELLIS 13 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 14 VINYL WINDOW 11.5-0 10P 0,0PNNG 0*C - VrCus #CIS 1 _ ,ck C09 90' SOUTH ELEVATION -.01 -.13 --02 --10 05 • 13 11 -.02 z THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 Nlaterial Index 01 LANDSCAPE STONE 02 CAST STONE 03 PREFIN. METAL #1 04 PREFIN. METAL #2 05 PREFIN. METAL #3 06 CEMENTITIOUS SIDING 07 CEMENTITIOUS PANEL 08 SLIDING GLASS DOORS 09 ALUMINIUM DECK/RAILING 10 GLASS RAILING 11 PREFIN. METAL CANOPY 12 PREFIN. METAL TRELLIS 13 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 14 VINYL WINDOW hitects P.Plirtlarr9.77 .7-9 ' 11111111 THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 OrS1 PMDENTN. .1:1120.LL 11.0111.4 1000. 1030nWR4 WESOLNP1 11:9012111.1. 11.101r. 1111100.1. 1011001.1. MUNE PAPANG 1.00M. • 9-) BUILDING SECTION 1" = 0' 5' 20' 40' 9 1.',Slani SOUTHDALE CIRCLE 11:CLL.LIELLi I architects 0'5' 20' 40' 90' SITE PLAN _ THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 7/7-7 -0 "OgZ itV. .,,,,,o,,,.... IR .0....A.L...A .444/mordlig4 1111111110N•Fik,Ilii."1, ipre,z imi•••••.4,,,,,:, ,41j 11114.1.0 :1 (..----•:0- ,wmasL, ,,,,,,, &,•,,,,Aii_lini.::::::::,..„„o'it..1 ) um 1 111.....J.jimpri , 1 op 11,,IE .,11(1111L10.1 >,.., 4,......11111_1. ,,,,,,,, Mil ii or '•,J- IC: ,tvlb, Z.'S J. ,_______etommarlio_NIN - omit a III 0( Nis wiLs0, , !.:1,- 1 : r -1 .:e4 iii Vb..004 v't A Av rillip'. ' , i.91110141 - - - m.• A 1 I WI= a... 1.• eat .1 j fig r 1 r:e , = MIIME•111WW/111111111111111111111111111111111IdlIMMIEMIIIIIIII*"...11.cm_ jrn_itetimmor ! ....T....L.. ,Aili........................0.......)....A..... , __......,.. ...._ - ..,,-,......„1, „I.e..* ;7,1,-- - • ---- . 41"4 MUCKS WEST 66TH STREET SMACK Io ST 011)&5 ..` _ TIP _ 1THE GATEWAY POINTE Edina, MN OCT.30.201 5 rift In' WEST BETH STREET • -41IP 7.:71 r''PZ1 AERIAL OVERLAY architects NO LL dlk i 0 S 30 1V 0 3 1 Amor r dVNI A.J.INIOIA r r LW\ ; iAsif gi§Fg 9 22EY' 8 3 I I g g a 33 443 trl li hp otD,185g 0-4.1,46c30801.0m0.•o 1 HO Pi i ii /HMV ..,3 i! <2. 4 C,) `-' \ vt i -' 02 "es) — 11 ' iv I ;111 1 \n /% '3' "e„ r 1° Drawing arne: X: \ 2015 \150112\survey \ existing conditions \150112sur,dwg Sep 23, 2315 — 1:20prn ce.0.9e WEST 66TH STREET .colisessralcsorn 5, T. 1. 41 4.1 15o 1, :la, 11.1 Y." 1,5 = El al Warr 41ra rail OWN till 1 rd dilinirda1111 AMMINIP.IWAIMILINIF 11411111mrpal4Wikalit- AMIE 4koorgeo 4Nopono.0.4.0.1114-eco x,)t_K AmkVielowe: 1 1 KAI.° 5 W.A1.4*1?' = = --11= - THE GATEWAY POINTE ten 1.71 001118=1 M1111131100.*A4.55415 • architects .5 00000 0.14 b.e. designs, lic =X=1 ti s tas IMP... NE ▪ F.= 151 XE R XE S A V E N U E NIMPO1111.1'.;11.731. VII =XI PRIVIVOTI= 117:4171%Z. SUP0.111011 IMO N. I AM • DULY 1.81400 0.19711. OMR V* 410 OF 7. 01.2 OF M.O.& 4.2 11, 4.: I, • 4.: 11, 145 •4.4 151 4, 4.1, I.: 151 4.1 4,1 4.1 11, 151 4.1 15.1 15 115 = • .4 jitiLl Irak' 111 tOZ-4n1 IGO 3 '777. ES=1.1111MmENNI,MiNgil `'..4Wiip);Nil il.n 11.0 11.0 rAIittrite5 ta4i DATE: CleT011110. It 2015 CITY SUBMITTAL OCTOBER 12, 2015 0.0.11 SITE LIGHTING PLAN rTh SITE LIGHTING PLAN 0.810) AS100 GATEWAY POINTE - - - - WEST 66TH STREET SOUTHDALE CIRCLE 47 . . NOTES: 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BUILDING AND OVERHANGS. e REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT. 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER. 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS. e REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. 0REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING SIGN. e REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING LIGHT POLE. s REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE. KEYNOTES: / 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ES/STING STORM DRAIN. 0 REMOVE ANS DISPOSE OF EXISTING BOLLARDS. C> REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF IDDS11NG FENCE. e REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING WATER SHUT OFF. 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING GAS SHUT OFF. 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING ELECTRIC METER, 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF DUSTING DECK. 0 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING AIR CONDITIONING UNIT. ® REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING RETAINING WALL. 1 I. REMOVAL OF AU. AGGREGATE SURFACING REGARDLESS OF TFIICKNESS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL 2. IEGACT umrrs OF CLEARING AND GRUBBING WILL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD D. ALL REMOVAL ITEMS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE PROJECT SITE (INCIDENTAL) A. TEMPORARY FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY TREE REMOVAL (INCIDENTAL) 5. CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM STORM SEWER B. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AU- SITE REMOVALS WHETHER SHOWN ON PLANS OR NOT. ^./..".".. CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL =EA REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT LEGEND: UTILITY PIPE REMOVAL 0(8 9 0C-'‘ DATE BY REVISION° OW42.1 TV I XEIIERYDER71,11011,11S BLAX..ECIPIGTI RTWAS PREPARED BY OR WIDEN PAY DIRECT ELM V Y I AM A DULY .121DZE.DuPROPEOSIONAL !NOW \ [MATE OF C'19 WSB 701 WON Alemb.1111 HMO RII150.0041,17031 641.1700 HA— PLAN ny. CIU GICCFE9 ',PROVED TV TOM MOLL, P 10OPP2015 c •I m ED I NESOTA SHEET C1.1 OF TOTAL SHEETS REMOVALS JOB# 03215-00 SHEET C2.1 OF TOTAL SHEETS GATEWAY POINTE DATE OV C111( PIEVI:o1014 1.11,IUN DY TV IHrlICBV CL117,71.7 PLAN,nCCIFICATI: L'I'C'EN7Cr0711Yelq•f1=1.TIZ4= . :11111[707 1 TOM F .7TA. WSB 701 Xen•Annu 00..1.300 111m8,4.1.11156410 .I70.71511.04.2 f7031611.1700 *P.m KAM isn CK-/ APPII0VE0 TV MOLL. P E D 101090015 L,c 43412 EDINP MUJNESOTA Ct DING PLAN JOB# 03215-00 111E8LINE SPOT ELEVATION CONTOUR RIP RAP OVERFLOW ELEV. PROPERTY OMIT CURB OUTER BUILDING RE7AINING WALL WEILAND LIMITS STORM SEWER ID—. BOMA 87 — o WEST 66TH STREET B75.7 K878.9 0 et- FFE=880.0 87 SOUTH DALE CIRCLE / 0/ LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING ER STRUCTURE STRUCTURE SCHEDULE EN I TIE 7 CASING.. \\ Ilin 11171IMMIN ..PROVIDE 27 NI, ND EI 010 INC IN MANHOLE SLAB COVER. NONIMUMTE: THE 210 R A IHR SUPPUER SHALL DE2ERMINE lYE MI UIRED FOR EACH STORM la S1RUCTIIRE. 7. SOUTHDALE CIRCLE _ SIISSURACE —OA WEST 66TH STREET RIDA0711.10 we-m.110(s _ most c• nrc • rentOUTE 10 10 05 FFE=880.0 Ci&AIN A11.07250 mweamo LOp.. 142...57 ELEM.) 77 LEGEND PROPOSEO MANG CURB A DUPER STORM SEVER SANITARY SEAER G-0 FoRam•• (sm.) 0-- no —t3i WATERMAN 1.4-1-1-1k EASEMENT n •nn ••n ••n -HYA• ORAINELE --A — A — SAS UNE —a— ELECTRIC —.— TELEPHONE RCV119.10 ,CLION n=f=r+0=7' 1..70.1 740 01\1\1 '"sr. I VOL Or A WSB 701 XI. Arm. 1....6.M1 65410 uk ram •1•100, •••••, otui so-non GATEWAY POINTE UT CKJ .4E04178V )03( APPROv[0 lv TOM DOLL. P E 10./201S .12 EDINA, MINNESO SHEET C3.1 OF N TOTAL JO Ot n215-00 SHEETS DATE: November 3, 2015 TO: 3200 Southdale Circle Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague — Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner P.E. - Director of Engineering Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 3200 Southdale Circle — Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Survey dated 9/23/15, Civil drawings undated and printed 10/6/15, and Architectural drawings dated 10/12/15 Details I. A developer's agreement will be required. a. Developer will be required to document existing road conditions on Southdale Circle and Xerxes Avenue with a pre and post construction condition survey completed. Degradation of Road conditions will be to be maintained or improved following the post construction condition survey through reconstruction or mill and overlay. b. Plat public easement or transfer fee ownership of dedicated public right of way. Survey I. Apply for vacation of existing easements. Provide confirmation that private easements have been vacated. 2. Describe easements or transfer dedicated outlets for public sidewalk and any public utilities. Traffic and Street 2. Maintain sidewalk access on York and W 66th during construction. 3. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. 4. Crosswalk on York right turn lane will need to be brought up to current requirements. 5. Clearly denote private paths or sidewalk. Maintenance for non-public sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. 6. Construction staging traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. 7. Coordinate with Metro Transit on specifications for a concrete pad for the continued use of the bus stop at the north-east corner of the project site. 8. Roadway light fixtures shall be consistent with York Ave structures. 9. Apply for curb cut permit for entrances. 18" bituminous patch required. Sanitary and Water Utilities 10. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations (is the existing hydrant off York staying?) 1 I. Clearly indicate private vs public utilities. 12. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 13. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer's engineer. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 7f3c 14. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Storm Water Utility 15. Estimate system flood risk at Xerxes and 66th and provide detailed grading and driveway elevations to ensure that garage is not at risk. I 6. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report. 17. Provide more detailed information for infiltration system on southeast side of project. 18. Existing removed storm sewer connections will need to be completely removed to catch basin and bulk headed. 19. Evidence of watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed is required for building permit. Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 20. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site permit is required. Other Agency Coordination 21. Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit is required. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits are required. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 3(0 Cary Teague From: David Fisher Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 12:32 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Best Buy / Gateway Pointe Carry, A quick review: Need to make sure they keep the ceiling height in the parking ramp for commuter van parking and accessibility. Provide adequate accessible parking. 800 MHZ radio transmission require by police and fire. Recommend 30%, 60%, 90 % meetings with design team and the Building Division. I would recommend type one construction throughout the whole building. This is not required. Provide a complete building code analyses with building plan for construction. David Fisher, Chief Building Official 952-826-0450 I Fax 952-826-0389 DFisher(aEdinaMN.qoy I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Tell us how we're doing! Take our customer satisfaction survey. 1 A3 Chair Platteter thartWthe development team for their input adding he looks forward to formal submittal; however, this development places a lot on this spot. B. Sketch Plan Review. Best Buy Site. 3101 West 66th Street, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 2 acre parcel at 3101 66th Street West and 6612 Xerxes Avenue. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing vacant Best Buy building and single-family home, and redevelop it with a six-story 210 unit apartment with a 3,800 square foot restaurant. The building would have one level of underground parking. Details of the project include: D 210 units — 104 units per acre D FAR 2.2 D Parking ratio of 1/1 for the residential units —210 for residents and 63 for the restaurant D 3,800 square foot restaurant and outdoor dining D Health and fitness center D Community cafe D. Pool D Small park Teague noted that the entrance to the site would be off Southdale Circle and Xerxes Avenue. The single-family home site would be primarily utilized by a small park. To accommodate the request, two amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet tall to 6 stories and 70+ feet tall; and Housing Density — from 75 units per acre to 104. Teague said a rezoning of all the property to PUD, Planned Unit Development is also requested. Continuing, Teague pointed out this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. A study is currently underway in this area as part of the Planning Commission's work plan. Teague further noted that the France Avenue Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant. They have been asked to address each of the Page I 6 principles with any formal application. Teague presented graphics of the project and introduced the development team. Pete Keely, College Architects and Kurt Krumenauer, Midwest Apartment Brokers Applicant Presentation Mr. Krumenauer, informed the Commission their intent is to develop this site as a "Gateway" corner through density, quality of design and aligning with the 66th Street Urban Corridor Revitalization. Mr. Keely said as mentioned by Mr. Krumenauer the intent is to create a gateway and to express something larger and bold. The proposed plan takes advantage of the curve at York Avenue and West 66th Street by establishing a linear park. The plan holds the building edge at street level and provides a series of walk-ups and stairways. Continuing, Keely reported that the site consists of three properties and the existing buildings would be removed, adding the proposed building is C shaped and can be viewed as two building areas. The proposal is for a mixed use project with a 210-unit (4-6-stories) apartment building with a 3,800 square foot restaurant and 1,200 square feet of office space with parking access directed off of Southdale Circle. The site includes 273 parking stalls. Continuing, Keely added the exterior materials are proposed as stone; larger pieces of Glass. As previously mentioned a linear park in proposed along with terraces and walk- up units. Continuing, with graphics Keely highlighted for the Commission aspects of the proposed redevelopment. In conclusion, Krumenauer said their intent is to develop something special, adding they have been working on this project for two years and believe what's presented is a good project and would appreciate feedback from the Commission. Discussion Chair Platteter pointed out this proposal "asks" for a lot and questioned what the City "gets" with this project. Mr. Keely responded that the density provides the building with the financial means to do an upscale project that will include the linear park and the addition of another park/open space on the south end. Exterior building materials are enhanced. Another point is that with this project the development team is trying to keep the rents reasonable while creating a life style choice providing walkability, exercise and community area near fabulous amenities. Commissioner Forrest commented that she finds the design attractive and interesting; however there's a lot going on especially on the south side (Taco Bell). Forrest said it appears that the south park/open space area while a great idea looks quickly added. Concluding Forrest said she's also not sure on height. Mr. Keely said it would be very important for the team to know where the Commission Page I 7 stands on building height. Commissioner Carr said she too finds the design interesting and agrees this site is a "gateway" into the Southdale area. She further added that she thinks it was a good idea to drop the building height along Xerxes Avenue. Carr asked if they have settled on the type of stone indicated for exterior materials. Mr. Keely said that hasn't been decided yet; however he believes it may be Kasota stone, or something similar but not as white. Continuing, Keely said the curved facade is about making a statement. Chair Platteter said he agrees this is a gateway, adding he is intrigued with the curved facade; however, wants the team to remember the project is also a gate to the residential properties on Xerxes Avenue. Continuing, Platteter said that he is worried about access and parking on Xerxes Avenue. He also suggested that shadow studies be done before formal application. Mr. Keely asked Chair Platteter where he envisions apartment vehicle access. Platteter responded that in his opinion they should look at West 66th Street. Mr. Krumenauer interjected that he spoke with representatives from the City of Richfield and they too indicated they would like the access moved to West 66th Street. Platteter said to him that access point is a key piece, adding the City needs to look out for everyone. Commissioner Nemerov said he is hesitant on the walk-up apartments. He said if walk- up units aren't located in a residential pedestrian setting in his opinion they can look odd. Continuing, Nennerov said he also has a concern that the subject site could become an island if redevelopment doesn't occur to the south and asked the team if they considered more retail, adding it is important in this area to consider how "people get here and there". Mr. Keely said he agrees that walk-ups can appear odd or out of place; however, he believes if they get this corner "right" over time the area will evolve. Chair Platteter said a good point mentioned is pedestrian flow. Platteter said this site needs more work on walkability. Mr. Keely said he believes the linear park along West 66th Street would encourage walkability and pedestrian movement. Keely explained the linear park would be a razed up walkway above the traffic zone that can move people through it, either to access their apartment or during a neighborhood walk. Commissioner Carr asked if they have decided if the linear park would have steps or would it be constructed on an incline. She said how it is constructed would make a difference. Mr. Keely said they are still refining aspects of the park, adding they want that edge softened. Carr said she doesn't want to see a huge wall along that portion of the site, adding she wants it to look attractive from the street. Commissioner Lee said she also finds the proposal intriguing and different. She added she likes the "light quality" of the proposal as it approaches Xerxes Avenue. Lee agreed that the team should look at a West 66th Street access vs. Xerxes Avenue. She said in her opinion the access indicated on the plans is too close to the residential properties on Xerxes Avenue. Continuing, Lee said the scale of the project can be broken up through exterior building materials. She said attention should be paid to the east and Page I 8 40 south elevations before formal application and suggested adding water feature somewhere on the site. She said she envisions kids splashing in a fountain on a warm day; and the outdoor area not just grass and a few trees. Commissioner Hobbs suggested that they work hard to create a more interactive site, pointing out this corner is very prominent, adding he likes the fact that the proposed building is different and innovative. Concluding, Hobbs suggested developing a site that brings the public in; is welcoming. Commissioner Forrest said in thinking about the "island" aspect of the site she suggested that they take advantage of all opportunities to bring people in; reducing "our" car culture. She suggested that they look at everything and anything they can to get people in, get people walking. Forrest said the location is also very good in promoting health, noting in the future there will be a new mass transit facility in close proximity to this site. Forrest agreed with other comments that they should revisit the parking access. Concluding, Forrest thanked the team for bringing in "something different", adding the look of this building in contrast to the boxed apartments on the Southdale site creates a unique street scape. Chair Platteter thanked the team for their presentations; adding it's an interesting project. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Platteter acknowledged\back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS It was reported that the Edina Historical Society will be featuring a tour of mid-century modern homes. The date is September 13, 2015. Chair Platteter noted the Commission will coriti\nue working on the 2016 work plan. Taylor Halva, student member informed the Commission this was her last Planning Commission meeting. Halva reported that she enjoyed her role as Commissioner and learned a lot about city government. Halva would be leaving for school in Boston this Fall. Chair Platteter and Commissioners thanked Halva for her service, adding she brought a lot to the Commission. X. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague reported that the City Council approved Stage 2 of the Greater Southdale Area Work Group Study. Teague said they expanded the woi*group from 12 Page I 9 Aci-( Minutes/Edina City Council/September I. 2015 Corporation, DIB Xcel Energy, its Successors and Assigns, for Provjr1 Electric Service within the City of E a. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, wart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PROPOSED POLICY F4 CONSERVATION AN /SUSTAINABILITY (CAS) FUND — APPROVED 4(1- VII.D. PARTNERS I NERGY PROGRAM PLANNING TEAM — POINTED Manager Neal exp ed that the Council was requested to appoint three- .t-large citizen members to the Partners in Ene rogram Planning Team. The Cou discussed the student volunteer and whether to add a fourth me r. The Council each listed r recommended appointees and tallied the results. Member Brind made a motion, sec ed by Member Swenson, appointing Carolyn Jackson, Roy Jenson, Ma all Silberstein, a Rozy Eastaugh (student) to the Partners in Energy Program Planning Tea Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried VII.E. SKETCH PLAN BEST BUY SITE, 3101 66TH STREET WEST — DIRECTION PROVIDED TO PROPONENT Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague explained that the Council was asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the two-acre parcel at 3101 66th Street West and 6612 Xerxes Avenue. The proponent was proposing to tear down the vacant Best Buy building and single family home, and redevelop with a six-story 210 unit apartment with a 3,800 square foot restaurant. To accommodate the request, two Comprehensive Plan amendments were needed including building height from 4-stories to 6-stories and housing density from 75 units per acre to 104. Proponent Presentation Kurt Krumenauer, Midwest Apartment Broker, introduced Pete Keely, Collage Architects. Mr. Keely discussed design ideas, presented drawings, and talked about where the project was at currently. He shared that they were in the process of hiring a traffic management consultant to help address some of those concerns and the plan was to have larger units in order to answer the demands of the market. Mr. Keely answered questions of the Council relating to where the Promenade ended and walkability. The Council pointed out the Greater Southdale Area Nine Guiding Principles and encouraged the developers to address each principle. The Council indicated support of the building design and the setback, but preferred a sidewalk all the way around the building. The Council expressed concern with the properties located near the site and noted the traffic study would be important. VII.F. GREA Mr. Teague shared t Schroeder, Greater So Manager Neal explained that the Conse tion and Sustaintitility Fund was a special revenue fund created to account for new utility franchise fees. Th 2015 uti*franchise fees would be dedicated revenue of the Conservation and Sustainability Fund. Manage eplikussed eligible expenses, ineligible expenses for the fund, and a new City staff position that would, k across all departments to accomplish Conservation and Sustainability Fund goals. - Member Staunton made a motispe A, seconded byIlember Brindle, approving the proposed Conservation and Sustainabili rund Policy. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stew Swenson, Hovland Motion carried WORK GROUP ADDITIONS — APPOINTED roup had been interviewing candidates and introduced Michael dy Work Group Member. Page 3 4 Land Use and CornmunityFacilities Medium Density Residential (MDR) The Medium Density Residential land use category was derived from the Single-family Residential —High Density category (R-SFH) that was included in the City's 1999 Comprehensive Plan. The medium density residential category replaces the R-SFH category. Naming this category medium density better clarifies the intent of the residential uses within this category. Medium density residential accommodates attached housing, predominantly townhomes or condominiums ranging from 7 to 12 units per acre. Medium density residential also includes manufactured housing. Medium - High Density Residential (MHD) Medium - High Density Residential includes multi- unit and multi-building developments. The intent is to allow for higher density housing, such as townhome developments. The allowed densitywould rangefrom 12 to 24 units per acre and no greater than 4 stories tall. 4-18 Richfield Comprehensive Plan 4 Figure 4.8 2030 Future Land Use Plan Land Use and CommunityFacilities 44 " toOt gTh g ; 8 n 6 2 -gdEgE,If.-..f: ; 44 445 u as -X==- tr-JE@Emffo-AmlEg[ta] - Augpg 0.tl Oed 04In Ben I th 70Ih 7131 'and 174:: 751h 70111 Olh NIMEMMINgi gg-1 70Ih 112 7151 71511/2 72nd L±. 70th n Eac 1W11 .‘e H 1.464 ▪ I a • a 5 1111 Regional Commercial Neighborhood Commercial r--.1 Medium-High Density Res Park updated 8/2012 Regional Commercial/Office I I Office Medium Density Res 11111 Institutional Comm Commercial 1111 High Density Res I I Low Density Res I I open Water Comm Commercial/Office High Density Res/Office IT—I Mixed Use Richfield Comprehensive Plan 4-15 ORDINANCE NO. 2016- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-9, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-9 DISTRICT AT 3101 WEST 66TH STREET AND 6612 XERXES AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to rezone the below described property to PUD, Planned Unit Development in accordance with the following: Sec. 36-493 Planned Unit Development District-9 (PUD-9) — Gateway Pointe (a) Legal description: Lot 1, Block 1, Southdale Addition; and RLS Number 629 Tract B; and Lot 1, Block 1, York Terrace, Hennepin County, Mn. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans received by the City on October 30, 2015 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2015-_, on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All principal uses allowed in the PCD-3, Planned Commercial — 3 District (PCD-3) Multi-Family Residential (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-3, Planned Commercial District-3 (PCD-3) (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-3, Planned Commercial District-3 (PCD-3) except multifamily residential. (f) Development Standards. Development standards per the PCD-3 Zoning District, except the following: Building Setbacks Building Setbacks Front — York Avenue 15 feet Front — 66th Street (Story 1) 15 feet (Story 2-6) 28 feet Front — Xerxes (Story 1 ) 15-25 feet (per the plan) (Story 2-6) 26-33 feet (per the plan) Rear — Southd ale Circle 15 feet Rear — South Side 12 feet Rear — South to Residential (Story 1) 50 feet (Story 2-6) 60 feet Building Height Six Stories & 70 feet Maximum Floor 2% Area Ratio (FAR) (g) Signs shall be allowed per the PCD-3 standards in Sec. 36-1714, with the exception that no signage shall be allowed on the Xerxes Avenue side of the building that directly faces residential uses. Signage may be allowed above the garage opening on Xerxes. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon Met Council review and decision on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: 2 6725 YORK AVE. .-9)ECELIWIET)) = 12 P 0 ar, o o o _ e E a [ o co a o o r a r = r\ > „.- 1 1 . I o a o rs cs o o E m r Do f 0 E DECEMBER MORNING HAM (DEC 21 SUNRISE: 7:51 AM) i-41 rs„ t• =Lt. - po 0 ET 6Us, 13.. a boo o , tjJ cti cl t c a r 0 P 0 e o 03 I7:1 a r 0 t 0 0 . . . • 0 0 o . DECEMBER MORNING 9AM . TI 'CI 0 .ID IL . t C113 t 'f3 t _ o ...— r\l" • 0 .0 p ' 0 .6 ; 0 I •DI 'R 1171 r .ifiiii 1_.[ o a .,,, k 0 2 . lirirla. 1 •oi 1-, DECEMBER MORNING 10AM _ . gra- t g • t o El 2 i 0 r .c:A E c ° .. .. D ti ;0 8 P e •0 6 o g t3 o . 'r ' i i' i P 0 0 t ID c 0 E t5' 1 ,o a I DECEMBER AFTERNOON 11AM a • / Ls,,,j. o. OPo 0 0 Li C3 0 0 a If] a O D r0 0 0 o a a a 0 0 0 Q 0 a o. a 0 b DECEMBER EVENING 2PM ' . b u 12, 0 0 L 013 C d3 li o n r n i E= =1.-- a a ' 0 a a o [ o a q 6 1 DECEMBER AFTERNOON 12PM §1-7-01 P 0 o 0 a 0 0 0 hi ii- o 0 c 0 o E El t ...... • . lim 0 0 0 a 0 o, o o [ 4 I 0 S 0 f c 0 DECEMBER EVENING 3PM - czj El P 0 . 0 D • w 0 II • d o 0 0 • a 1 - IN,. It o o e a 0 DI a a 1 P ' m 0 J a DECEMBER AFTERNOON 1PM, ffi=4„,„„Erl g . II, EL.:: a g 0 nii.3.1 0 0`8 E 0 . 01 i) =C".' 13 0 o o 0 a a a I 1 - 1 n - n nn •• •n • • O P O 0 0 C 0 M 0 0 0 0 DECEMBER EVENING 4PM (DEC 21 SUNSET:4:41 PM) ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHADOW STUDY 03/25/2014 ROW:. Us. 0•1•11,11•K Doi. On, 1.01Uk AVE. SHADOW STUDY - OCCEMO. A 0 . 7 a-J0—M7177 FLJ nzc7F0c: 703Qp.inp WOLOc0130-Cp is I.JDO AD7o ,01_,CD7oL CrOm /N. 2CVL3.4 141.1;1] a.g4cgiiquoio .0[7°P=IGauct,cp 1-LOP744acce,poo4co. c.0 g 1/4\t" • 1. \\, 1 0 7 1 U o n a o 0 70Ou0Bc3OU DgOODDIJC=ZOL F,1701:11Doi3 D7O.DGDfluA4Da I=1 _7 r _ 3170120o0 n o o .Dout=io 3nta00Uta jog c00000n 000 3v0oDtgOoo 1,C0J.,c32,,Cff .3a,3 ..0 00 ' • • k • • or ocintY7-3. ri Li 0 O9 EC) II3c..otactilcaoq ()pout:to aac.00 o 3R13300-00o Daocia0achflOno y- c.0 D SHADOW STUD Y 03/25/2 014 i .2 . i 5 i ; 1 I 4 I 1 2 . i Er' ta- ' 5 LD 0 DE C EM BE R M O R N I N G 9 A DE C E M B E R N O O N 0 0 uJ -74nop7pf.30 n1=1 DucpspC1 1--- J.9.q9CT9I',7.0 1 C. 2. .U1313 PPP EPP 9 3907p .a .:11.1U P?CooC.0 ..0 a ele:p ia,LJ 00 10 I mg Ca Mil i I-.. A \ ' " 4'• aonnachan n 0 0 uo Go1-43 Doouguci,30 woopoom9jOto JgooDcgoDo Li7DE3r=rdcaria=3 ...a al 1. --'------- / IA- (— 0 MN — •-, ., .. ,..-- , . J ,/ \ \s/ • \ / -,. 070D=5:10o C0 n oval00 aJouOugaitu opocroo0=9:30u poolig000 C1c131.e.udLAOD. m.71:30 D i • L 1 u .. • . r I -7 • • . v\-, , .../ , , O60flR000 flOomocncpo Do6aou9f :G.uo 0 04.1,6600 at,Jori.,:uo. cio.t!-.1415-.noco c.d ol n 1 — : -, ------------_-----",------ 0 • Arl . :.. K"../../\::1 i'•\ e:: %. / J UN E M O R N I N G 9 AM MA R C H / S E P T E M BE R N O O N JU N E EV E N I N G 3 P M MA R C H / S E P TE M B ER E V E N I N G 3 P M The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site Redevelopment) Traffic and Parking Study For: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55024 November 4, 2015 Prepared By: WSB & Associates, Inc. WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55416 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. da4,4 -r-Ige. Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Date: November 4, 2015 Reg. No. 26082 THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) 11/04/2015 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 PAGE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATION 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 LIST of FIGURES! TABLES 3 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 7 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 10 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 16 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS 20 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS 21 LIST of FIGURES / TABLES Figure 1 - Location Map 5 Figure 2 - Proposed Site Plan 6 Figure 3 - Existing Traffic 9 Figure 4 - Projected 2017 No-Build Traffic 12 Figure 5 - Projected 2030 No-Build Traffic 13 Figure 6 - Projected 2017 Build Traffic 14 Figure 7 - Projected 2030 Build Traffic 15 Figure 8 - Level of Service Ranges 17 Table 1 - Development Site Traffic Generation 11 Table 2 - Existing Conditions Level of Service Summary 18 Table 3 - Projected No-Build Level of Service Summary 19 Table 4 - Projected Build Level of Service Summary 19 Table 5 - Parking Required per City Code 20 Table 6- Parking Demand per ITE 20 THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) 11/04/2015 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 PAGE 3 INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts for the proposed redevelopment of the Best Buy site and adjacent single family lot at 3101 66th Street and 6612 Xerxes Avenue. The site is located south of 66th Street between York Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed site redevelopment includes 210 multifamily residential units and a 1,760 sf coffee shop. 271 total parking spaces will be provided on the lower level and first floor. Access to the site will be from Southdale Circle and Xerxes Avenue which are the same driveway locations as what is provided today for the Best Buy site. The access on Xerxes Avenue will only be to the lower level for the residential portion of the development. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the proposed development were evaluated for the existing and future 2017 and 2030 conditions at the following key intersections: 1. 66th Street at Xerxes Avenue 2. 66th Street at York Avenue 3. York Avenue at Southdale Circle North 4. York Avenue at Southdale Circle South 5. York Avenue at 69th Street 6. Xerxes Avenue at 69th Street The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) 11/04/2015 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 Ac PAGE 4 - — 1 (- --1 41 E TR O T -- - T. , . ., r t . . 7 i IN G U A L L I I A V E c-3 \\ . ”_ . ---11 , WI L RY AN 7 , A V E '':0 1 n ,I .:P 4 , '<\,..---"k F l c r . ..."..), -- \,. . . . . 1% = . 0 . . . . . .. . _ -1 . . -n 1 5: : (: )__ _ _ _ --1 J OS E P H II IN E AV E .A <I - c. _A I BL V D. 1 1 1 1 S 1 _ _______ ' - '. - -- --' a '- - C i ,-. 26 . J S HE RW O OD A V -T. 1 1 1 1 1 ,1 1 1 1,- t ,.. . . 7 , - - - 1 r [RY AN AV E .4 ,' Z . 9i i "= o s L Av E. g . " ir f E T ? 'r ; P AR N E L L 7 73 o -, m WE S T > a > m RG I N I A AV E1 / VI R G IN I A ; :s 1;I E zt x / F T 1 --, 7 - o > E° "°0 DA t p 4 :' . t. I . f As H a R o c l I -7 E ..-. ?.. I I "' 8 1 PO I N T P -7 ° D R. a) u . , m < [AV E O R N EL IA CI R. .1. fi z ' E PA R K L A W N A NI E• , ., AV E.CO R N E L I A - i . HIL L C i p 'E .< i n n o A B R 0 OK VI E W a A VE . F c ...‘ c " t ..*. > (B L VD . li f i g i; 1 -4 ‘.1 .7c : n CI R . a) S B RI S T O L- .e. PE AC E D AL E C r i L YM AR AV E . z l. -4 VI GA L L AG E R g , H AL IF A X 1 0 a l 0 L A?YN M A R R " L A. 5 3 ts , ki in i o 1 , -- I 7 3 2. 7 n 1 , F R A NC E ' - 1 i av E.1 Y AM 11 L ia l i l l f :',1 i r ,. .. - H I li 3 _I • t r V I 2 VI 0 t i = I DR E W (44 1 0 C ) n I .7 I * A z 1 0 ..c x t o N )1 11 1 CC n r E N T R s( P 1-- .-4 W AY \ ED I N B O RO U G H WA Y Co t , 0 1 "0 7 ' " 4 -FR Y L A. \D 11 '2 1 0 I — — 7, l < (6 ' 1 .1 BA RR I E\ el p l i , :4 7 1 , H CA ) 1 , ...4 0 Y O R K AV E. c -1 RD . 0 IL 1 I (1 0 0 = = I = • , : l 1 \ \ \ YO R K A V E TE R. n 1 r i c -) L Y OR K 2 N 1 1 . . ,., i [ 14 ' .. , 5 1 : ,,,, • ‘1 , 4 Z • s,, .\\ . X E RX E S .. N ., , _ \ \N A V E...N s, k .. . . XE R X ES I I AV E. I r u i I FI F 1 1 -11 I I II 1 1 I 1-4 7 I 7 11 —1 ... 8 : a c = CH Cu 62 nd 64 th tSr. g..T. Cornelia • -P ROYCA .A N.1 m -1 z HAZEL TON COM PU TER Pill 7 t 3 .._,,,, .,, ,fic7 ,:v-, OPP Y' \OR E M MINNESOTA < 1 1111 1 -1 ;o' ..- - - > i .1 2 640 ' N._ 2 0 41 (I] i- E1 gi s/i . . \ -A\ '2 BRI TTAN Y RD. RY AN11-3 1 A VE. 52 0 SI- / cF3 A X. r c:/.7 ..t .. )J 1,7, --_,31 - --1 PA CRNELL 4 A VE. 5 1- ‘3 -° VIIIR DOJ 2 "7' c, ; F.. ) g ) 2. r •-. eb 41 . .„.4.. O P 5,' • ?, L A. - 4 er DR. x .,, ,:.:, c:-..._____4? -.. .. ; . $1 . 2E !R A I: V3 .5 i. :3 e O A 71 4? Fl g CRESTON 7:: =Ea _ DISC DR. c.. " (z> 'Th 7 i W O D) 0 Ar,D ,„ , , .. -,,, K ELL OG G AVE. 0 p al kt... n.i KELLOGG AV E. -31-- ° -IP,- -, . DR. 1= - ----- 0 -741f . GLO 4H ES TE R DR. GL OUCHES T PR A VE. a La Li t f-VIDERE g ANDOVERIJA. CD MAVELL VW' • ASPASIA "P CZAh3k,E0 LA. 0 CD --I -I IY il7) VI-3---1 IA 2 1-- 7.-i' cc Lox o r-0 ASP,4 0/4 r 39. ICV WR.-31- /14 li' 114:4111cw07 —17 c!c:j —111-'6-AM:174=o 0 kl,HIBISCLIs --ao -q- .t..? -44SirORTH DR. cc 0 ffi r.1' 04,04 >- AVE. --NI 9,15 41 ELL DR. 0 o n , z IA 2 P"L" GIL F ORD DR. rt x f 0--..... LA. HIBISCUS La ali .- m ,c > _I _1 11.1 0 Lake > a a CD PARKLAWN l a AVE. o Edina cc c_.004' I S a 1" C - ... , m , ;iy> MILLER'S MF, C,7 r-. '---- . h r :""' ...7.4t, 7a.3 At. Er / (( OA KL A WN F r>, LAY L2:_i4,-/: N i a c . s T .E 2 n / F CO/\.......c .......... A, HEATHE RTON HEATHER10,1/'Lril °,414 ,,, ., ... 14 i . 1 & S°1/4.110 A L „ RD. , t1; DREW o h a i i AV E. COLO NY \ BEA RD souTo Project 1---'i.i3ts:aFuADNsz . e8 Location 47 ON C., c3 <cn LA. X Ho ii 701-h "C. >- W. Z 0 0> 2 -1 < 0 12 C) Traffic and Parking Study The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site) City of Edina, Minnesota Figure 1 Project Location Map THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 ,A5 11/04/2015 PAGE 5 Y/S13 Feenome, IC,\01655-680n Cod\ExighitslI655-5t ffe-02 - Ste fleet Cate WEST BETH STREET THE GATEWAY _ _ POINTE - _ - _ - . . . Eon° NAN - - ' • OCT.30 2015 - OF - I - - O. oecrvvisii"-.7- -eaneetN. - - I _S - • - C - < -? 4- 0 ..>. , _ .. . ai . w , • --1 Ti. -I > 4 al _ ....a:, ....., . - - I- 7 _ -- t V - . . - . . MCC ,.. ,. x , n.- . .. - .. ... 1 . . -- .- -- -- - _ .. - , ' - — , t . • _ SOLITHDALE CIRCLE -----, ti) '•'.--,F;'; 4. -. _ , 1 S ; Ir i ,—, -"Mr- .- (I) el m------- — SITE .=....sa..1 Traffic and Parking Study Figure 2 • The Gateway Pointe Buy Site) (Best l• City of Edina, Minnesota Site Plan 89 -98 9 1 ON 13 3 10 }i d [ I SM EXISTING TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS The existing lane configurations and traffic control for the roadways impacted by the proposed development include: York Avenue (CSAH 31) is a Hennepin County north/south a 4-lane divided Minor Arterial roadway. Primary access on York Avenue in the area of the proposed site is from local streets and driveways into Southdale Center. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 30 mph. The current Average Daily Traffic on York Avenue is 22,000 vehicles per day (vpd) south of 66th Street and 17,300vpd north of 66th Street. 66th Street (CSAH 53) is a Hennepin County east/west 4-lane divided Minor Arterial roadway. Street access and access to adjacent developments are provided from this roadway. The speed limit posted on 66th Street is 35 mph. The current Average Daily Traffic on 66th Street is 17,100vpd east of Xerxes Avenue and 14,700vpd west of York Avenue. 69th Street is an east/west City 4-lane divided collector roadway west of Xerxes Avenue in the City of Edina. East of Xerxes Avenue in the City of Richfield, 69th Street is a local two lane residential street. Direct access is provided to adjacent development and residential properties from the roadway. The speed limit posted on 69th Street is 30 mph. The current Average Daily Traffic on 69th Street is 3,000vpd east of Xerxes Avenue, 4,050vpd between York Avenue and Xerxes Avenue and 11,000vpd west of York Avenue. Xerxes Avenue is a local north/south two lane roadway which is the border between the City of Edina and City of Richfield. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 30 mph. The current Average Daily Traffic on Xerxes Avenue is 750vpd. The lane configurations and traffic control at each of the study area intersection are as follows: 66th Street at Xerxes Avenue - Side Street Stop control (3/4 intersection) SB development driveway - one right turn only NB Xerxes Avenue - one right turn only EB 66th Street - one through/right, one through WB 66th Street - two through, one left 66th Street at York Avenue - Traffic Signal control SB York Avenue - one free right, two through, one left NB York Avenue - one free right, two through, two left EB 66th Street - one free right, two through, two left WB 66th Street - one free right, two through, two left York Avenue at Southdale Circle North - Side Street Stop control (right-in/right-out) SB York Avenue - two through NB York Avenue - one continuous right, two through WB Southdale Circle North - one right turn only THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 11/04/2015 PAGE PAGE 7 York Avenue at Southdale Circle South - Side Street Stop control (3/4 intersection) SB York Avenue - two through, one left NB York Avenue - one continuous right, two through WB Southdale Circle South - one right turn only York Avenue at 69th Street - Traffic Signal control SB York Avenue - one free right, two through, one left NB York Avenue - one through/right, one through, one left EB 69th Street - one through/right, one through, one left WB 69th Street - one through/right, one through, one left 69th Street at Xerxes Avenue - All-way Stop control SB Xerxes Avenue - one right/through/left NB Xerxes Avenue - one right/through/left EB 69th Street - one right, one through/left WB 69th Street - one right/through/left Weekday peak hour and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts and, daily approach counts were conducted during the weeks of October 12 to 17 and October 26 to 30, 2015. The AM peak hour counts were found to be 20% to 25% lower than the PM peak or Saturday peak counts. Therefore, only the PM and Saturday peak hours were analyzed with this study. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. Figure 3 shows the existing intersections and driveways along each corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study with the 2015 PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 A 16, 11/04/2015 PAGE 8 As- 11/04/2015 PAGE 9 THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 Existing Traffic Figure 3 Traffic and Parking Study The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site) City of Edina, Minnesota Fit e no me : l t ,A0 I 6 8 6- 6 8 0 ‘C o c Af x 60 . 1 0. 16 1 96 - 6 8 - E r ;s t ;r v d7 rt 190 1105; J. 750 1759, 220 Ivas, 'II 43MMED S'oLthdalo Cti-tr OM= Cut hi Cir Existing 2015 xx PM Peak SAT Peak TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS In order to analyze the lane configuration and traffic control needs projected traffic volumes were determined for the area. Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2017 which is the year after the proposed site is anticipated to be fully developed and; for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The following sections outline the traffic generation, as well as the traffic distribution and projected traffic volumes. A. Background (Non-Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. In order to account for some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period was used to project traffic from the 2015 counts to the 2017 and 2030 analysis years. In addition to the regional background traffic growth, other specific none development related traffic near the site was determined and included with the overall background traffic. These projects included: • Southdale One Apartments - 80% occupied • 6725 York Avenue - Under construction Traffic Studies were completed for these developments which documented the anticipated traffic levels. The future traffic volumes were included in the 2017 and 2030 background traffic projections. B. Development Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed development is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The table shows the PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. In addition, it was assumed that all the traffic from the site would be new and that no adjustments were made for dual purpose or pass-by/diverted trips. This also will provide for a worst case traffic condition. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) 11/04/2015 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 PAGE 10 Table 1 - Estimated Develo ment Site Trio Generation Use Size PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Apartments 210 units 131 85 46 108 54 54 Coffee Shop 1,760 sf 74 37 37 144 72 72 Total Site 205 122 83 252 126 126 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition C. Traffic Distribution Site-generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including: • Previous traffic and transportation studies in the area. • Anticipated origins and destinations for specific land use (i.e. location of commercial uses in relationship to residential). • Existing travel patterns. • City's current Transportation Plan model. The generated trips for the proposed development were assumed to arrive or exit the site using access to York Avenue via Southdale Circle and on Xerxes Avenue. Based on these parameters the following general traffic distribution was used to distribute the projected traffic volumes from the anticipated uses: • 30% to/from the north • 40% to/from the south • 15% to/from the west • 15% to/from the east D. Projected Traffic Volumes The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non-development traffic growth to the existing 2015 traffic counts to determine the "No-Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated site development traffic was then added to the no-build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 4 - 7 shows the projected 2017 and 2030 No-Build and Build PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) 11/04/2015 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 PAGE 11 2017 No Build Traffic Figure 4 Traffic and Parking Study The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site) City of Edina, Minnesota ifitial I I I „ ri4 , • 11S, 1, "! • . _ • e, 7z. ,1 , - ' 4 , _ •n-1..). • i • -1. " 49-vit.444 •••• F 2017 No-Build XX PM Peak IXX) SAT Peak •-; THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) 11/04/2015 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 PAGE 12 W5 e 1 V r Ic no me , K A0 76 6 6 -1 5a C nC o c ri E r h.b ,es \76 ,15 -a t f 1 ,7 •C 7 • 2 0 . 7 0 No E IW O fr o mr . 07 , Traffic and Parking Study The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site) City of Edina, Minnesota Figure 5 2030 No Build Traffic THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) 11/04/2015 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 PAGE 13 2017 Build Traffic Figure 6 Traffic and Parking Study The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site) City of Edina, Minnesota rgi.;.,..., ' -ZEr,_ . fq .1, • .1, -..n 1101 ;L r' ... i „ ft ' 411 wet i e 7 1 I, § 1 * n ; i I ard61101.1441111 I .„„.1.... ,..,, 66th Street 196 lit inc 2543 (191N stymtme.. Cif b ea. . 4fik, • ;Pt I OA 1 1 • r 2017 Build XX PM Peak SAT Peak 4P. ' -IV ," • Atel,i;1 THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 AP\ 11/04/2015 PAGE 14 Mo3 11/04/2015 PAGE 15 THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 2030 Build Traffic Figure 7 Traffic and Parking Study The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site) City of Edina, Minnesota I •`41..-1 I 11,1 „ " 1 t r• gro ;L: 1Nl'IF * rtpa.lut • 66th Street .• r 2030 Build XX PM Peak SAT Peak TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Existing and/or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the key impacted intersections on 66th Street, York Avenue, 69th Street and Xerxes Avenue. This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each analysis year. Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign-controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all-way stop, or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through-street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un-signalized intersections are shown in Figure 8. The threshold LOS values for un-signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 AV 11/04/2015 PAGE 16 Figure 8 - Level of Service Ranges for Signalized and Un-signalized Intersections Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection SOURCE, Level of Service thresholds horn the Highway Capacity ManuaL 2000. LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all-way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: • Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning-movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 A 65' 11/04/2015 PAGE 17 • SimTraffic is a micro-simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. Existing Level of Service Summary Table 2, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and 2015 traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operating at an overall LOS C or better during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours with all movements operating at LOS E or better. Table 2 - Existin 2014 Level of Service Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) 6 66th St at Xerxes Ave A (C) 8 A (B) 66th St at York Ave C (E) 34 C (E) 29 York Ave at Southdale Circle No A (A) 4 A (A) 3 York Ave at Southdale Circle So A (A) 6 A (A) 5 York Ave at 69th St C (E) 29 C (E) 27 69th St at Xerxes Ave B (C) 12 A (B) 10 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecasted Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2017 which is the year after the proposed site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 3 and 4. Table 3- Forecasted No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2017 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the major intersections at 66th Street and York Avenue and York Avenue and 69th Street. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 Ac 11/04/2015 PAGE 18 Table 3 - Forecasted No Build - Level of Service Intersection 2017 2030 PM Peak Hr Saturday Peak Hr PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hr LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) 66th St at Xerxes Ave A (C) 8 A (B) 6 B (D) 12 B (C) 11 66th St at York Ave D (E) 36 C (E) 29 D (E) 46 C (E) 30 York Ave at Southdale Circle No A (A) 5 A (A) 3 A (B) 9 A (B) 8 York Ave at Southdale Circle So A (A) 6 A (A) 6 A (C) 10 A (C) 10 York Ave at 69th St C (E) 29 C (E) 28 D (E) 34 C (E) 28 69th St at Xerxes Ave B (C) 12 B (C) 11 C (D) 20 C (D) 18 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB 84Associates, Inc. Table 4 - Forecasted Build, shows that, assuming the proposed development, all intersection would continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2017 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2017 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the no-build condition. Table 4 - Forecasted Build - Level of Service Intersection 2017 2030 PM Peak Hr Saturday Peak Hr PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hr LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) 66th St at Xerxes Ave A (C) 10 A (C) 8 B (D) 14 B (C) 12 66th St at York Ave D (E) 36 C (E) 29 D (E) 46 C (E) 31 York Ave at Southdale Circle No A (A) 7 A (A) 5 B (C) 12 A (B) 10 York Ave at Southdale Circle So A (A) 8 A (A) 7 B (C) 14 B (C) 12 York Ave at 69th St C (E) 31 C (E) 29 D (E) 37 C (E) 29 69th St at Xerxes Ave B (C) 14 B (C) 13 C (D) 24 C (D) 20 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB &Associates, Inc. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 A-V1 11/04/2015 PAGE 19 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS The parking demand for the proposed site development was analyzed based on the anticipated use for the site. Based on the current City Code the proposed development would require a total of 219 parking spaces. The current site plan includes 271 spaces. Table 5 shows a breakdown of the parking required per City Code. Table 5— Parkin Re uired per Cit Code Use Size Rate Parking Required Parking Provided Multi-Family Residential 210 units 1/unit 210 251 Coffee Shop 1,760 sf 1/200sf 9 20 Total Parking I I 219 I 271 Source: City of Edina The parking demand was also analyzed based on industry standards. The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, zlth Edition. Table 6 below shows the estimated parking generation rate and the anticipated peak parking demand on a typical weekday. This would represent the worst case conditions for the parking assuming the proposed full development of the site. Table 6— Site Parkin Demand per ITE Use Size Rate Weekday Parking Required Multi-Family Residential 210 units 1.20/unit 252 Coffee Shop 1,760 sf 10.40/1000sf 18 Total Parking I I I 270 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition Based on the results of the parking analysis, it can be concluded that the parking proposed with the site plan would be adequate for the proposed development plan. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 A G% 11/04/2015 PAGE 20 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed Best Buy site redevelopment project includes the addition of 210 apartment units and 1,700 sf of coffee shop space. The site is anticipated to generate 205 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 252 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Existing (2015) traffic operations, assuming the Southdale Residential is now 80% completed, all the key intersections are operating at overall LOS C or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour.. • Intersection traffic operations for the No-Build conditions in 2017 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • Intersection traffic operations for the Build conditions in 2017 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2017 and 2030. The overall LOS and delays do not show any significant changes from the no- build condition. • The proposed available parking would meet the City's Code and are below those identified by ITE. No parking space variances would be required. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Construct the access and pedestrian accommodations as shown in the site plan (Figure 2). No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed site development. THE GATEWAY POINTE (BEST BUY SITE) CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-68 46° 11/04/2015 PAGE 21 /10 1.117-77-e-e- 7x.e e az, pa- _ Ms. Dona HiMullen 6450 York Ave. S Apt. 309 ' Edina, MN 55435 - )4/,,a0.7 _a 15's C--;t- g5 0-x-- 3 //a'itl zav 46 ,,Ze4eA, 6 475;() Cary Teague From: John Stark <jstark@cityofrichfield.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 2:23 PM To: Scott H. Neal; Cary Teague Cc: Steve Devich; Melissa Poehlman; Karen Barton Subject: Former Best Buy Retail Development Scott and Cary, We had previously shared our comments and concerns with the developer on August 12. Here are Richfield City Staff's comments on the proposed development for the former Best Buy store on York/Xerxes and 66th Street: • The density on this site is much higher than we feel comfortable with along Richfield's border. It appears that the site is approximately 2 acres. With 210 units, that's 105du/acre. Our comments on the Comp Plan revision related to the Lennar Project said that we oppose densities over 24du/acre along the shared border. I think the final Lennar plans were between 75-80. • 273 parking stalls, including 11 tandem stalls (which we tend to discount), doesn't seem like enough (we rarely go below 1.5 stalls/DU which would equate to 315 on this site). The most likely (and perhaps only) spillover area is on Xerxes Ave. • We are concerned about an increase of traffic on Xerxes Ave. from the development (especially going south into the neighborhood). • We are concerned about 6 stories abutting the single-family neighborhood (their comp plan allows for only 4 stories on this site). Residents and the Mayor have vehemently opposed buildings over four stories along shared border. • We would be supportive of 20% of the units being affordable to households earning 50-80% of the AMI. Thanks for the opportunity to comment. -John John Stark I Director of Community Development City of Richfield Tel: (612) 861-9775 jstarkcityofrichfield.org ...A great place to thrive 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Todor Braianov <totobgoode@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 4:20 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2015.11 (The Gateway Pointe) To the City of Edina Planning Commission and the City Council, We have lived in our house (6616 Xerxes Ave. S.) for more than 16 years. It was the first house we bought. Initially we thought that we would live here for 2-3 years, outgrow it and move on, but we fell so much in love with it, the location, and the neighborhood, that once those years went by, we realized that this is our home. We have maintained our home throughout the years, to keep it up-to-date to the latest standards. We have replaced the siding, roof, driveway, all the appliances, and finished the basement, just to name a few. We were planning on expanding our patio this fall, but once we found out about this proposal for another 6 story building with 210 apartments on our street, we decided to cancel our project. Our main concerns with this proposal/project are: 1. The quality of life for the owners/occupants of the single family homes that remain on the street (Xerxes Ave. S.). This apartment building, along with the Lennar apartment building will increase the amount of households on the block close to 100 times (1000%), while the infrastructure around it will remain the same. The once quiet street, that Xerxes Ave used to be, will turn into a major traffic artery for everyone who lives in this building and needs to go to the close by shopping areas. We know that there are points taken for people to be walking more around this building, but we have to be realistic, this is Minnesota, you cannot be outside walking, or carrying your groceries, or shopping bags, for most of the time in the year, and people will be using their cars regardless of that. So with this we would like to express our disapproval of allowing the density increase (to 104 units per acre). 2. Privacy for the remaining single family homes (SFH). This apartment building will be too high, and too close to the existing houses. The proximity and the height of the building will be too close to the SFH backyards, where one is normally expected to have a private and tranquil environment. With this we would like to express disapproval of the building height (to 6 stories), and the building setbacks (to less than 75 feet) from SFH. 3. We are concerns about the potential decrease in home value due to items mentioned in the previous two points, as we have invested a lot of time, effort, and money in our home, and would be very disappointed to see that go to waste. 4. We are also concern about the pure aesthetics of the street. The remaining single family homes will be "out-of-place", stuck between two 6-story apartment buildings. If the goal of this building is to bring "a p9sitive look when entering the City of Edina", I am not sure that this will be achieved, when you have this clash of building types. Please take these concerns into consideration when the plans are reviewed and/or approved. Sincerely, Latinka and Todor Braianov 6616 Xerxes Ave. S. Edina, MN 55423 1 Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ross Bintner P.E. – Environmental Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Approve Lease Agreement with Cooperative Energy Futures for Community Solar Garden on Public Works Building Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize Mayor to Sign Lease Agreement with Cooperative Energy Futures for a Community Solar Garden on the Public Works Building. INTRODUCTION: The attached report and recommendation introduces the developing firm, describes the proposed Community Solar Garden (CSG,) summarizes important lease terms, describes risks and benefits to the City and subscribers, and provides analysis of the financial terms to the City and subscribers. ATTACHMENTS: Description Report and Reccomendation Lease Example Financial Analysis CEF Proposal Summary City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 December 1, 2015 MAYOR AND COUNCIL Ross Bintner P.E. – Environmental Engineer Approve Lease Agreement with Cooperative Energy Futures for Community Solar Garden on Public Works Building. Authorize Mayor to Sign Lease Agreement with Cooperative Energy Futures for a Community Solar Garden on the Public Works Building. Information / Background: On August 5, 2015 Council directed staff to develop a request for proposal (RFP) from solar developers for a Community Solar Garden (CSG). On August 31, Staff sent an RFP to CSG developers. Staff received requests from several developers for additional time, and the RFP attracted only one late proposal. On September 16, Staff reissued the RFP to allow proposers additional time. Following the RFP reissuance, proposal three proposals were received. Staff reviewed each and on October 20, 2015 Council authorized staff to sign a letter of intent to negotiate a lease agreement with Cooperative Energy Futures partnered with Innovative Power Systems (CEF-IPS or CEF). A copy of the non-confidential portions of the CEF proposal is attached. During negotiation of the lease, staff addressed a variety of risks in the proposal. This report and recommendation will introduce CEF and the proposed CSG, summarizes important lease terms, describes risks and benefits to the City and subscribers, and provides analysis of the financial terms to the City and subscribers. CEF describes itself as a partnership between one of the oldest and largest solar installers in the State and a pioneer in innovative resident-focused CSGs. The proposed lease would allow CEF to build a privately owned (630 kW DC, 576 kW AC) solar facility on the roof of the public works building. The CSG would be marketed exclusively to Edina residents for a period of 6 month, with the goal of providing CSG market access to Edina residents. There are a variety of important terms of the attached 25 year lease. This section will describe risks to be managed and potential benefit to the City and subscribers. The lease describes the premises to be leased as the entire roof, and an access path that can be used during normal business hours. The lease defines the facility as the privately owned solar array. During construction the city will vacate three double deep parking stalls in the public works facility for the developer to use as a staging area for material. During operations, REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 the City will allow the developer into the premises during working hours and by appointment. The lease describes the transmission premise and a solar easement that prohibits future development of a portion at the south east side of the property and the planting or removal of any trees that may grow to block the array. The lease requires the design of the facility to not overload or stress the building or roof, and requires minimum insurance to mitigate this risk. Annual rent is defined in the lease, starting at $7,500 with a 3% annual escalator. The lease could terminate without construction of the solar facility for events outside the control of the lessee, such as failure to secure a permit from NSP for interconnection of the facility into the power grid, structural review, or other technical issues. The lease was drafted by Jeffrey C. Paulson, who also consulted as a legal expert to write the request for proposals, and then reviewed by the developer and City staff. The lease also spells out that all environmental attributes are the property of the lessee. The City of Edina cannot market, publicize or take credit claiming any greenhouse gas reduction or other environmental benefit relating to the lease or CEFs construction or operation of the solar facility. The marketing, promotion and sales of subscriptions to the facility are the sole responsibility of CEF. The lease requires CEF to market exclusively to Edina residents for a period of 6 months, and requires that the subscriptions be only pay-as-you-go, (no lump sum, up-front payments allowed) with terms consistent with the proposal, and described below. The following topics that will define the developer/subscriber agreement and relationship are summarized. While the City of Edina is not a party to this agreement, because the lease requires the exclusive marketing to Edina residents, and the facility is on a public building, there may be confusion as to the facilities ownership. This alludes to the reputational risk that Edina may encounter in pursuing this model. CEF will market and enter into subscription agreements with approximately 30-90 individuals or households, each signing a 25 year agreement to purchase Xcel bill credits. The bill credits are purchased from CEF and result in a corresponding credit from Xcel on the subscriber’s bill relate to the production of the facility. Risks to the subscriber include; change in household electric use over time no longer matching with the size of the credit, moving or transferring credits and paying corresponding fees, lag in the billing and credit system sometimes requiring monthly spikes in out of pocket costs, degradation of the solar panels over time reducing the size of the credits, the unknown spread of future electric costs compared to the fixed cost escalators in the subscription agreement reducing or eliminating expected savings, and the payment of fees in subscription needs to be canceled. To assist the Council and future subscribers to understand the financial arrangement and risks, Staff has modified a net present value spreadsheet that was initially created by the Met Council to facilitate the community solar joint purchase that the City of Edina is also pursuing. That analysis is attached and should be used without warranty for errors and omissions. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 Next Steps: After the lease is signed, CEF will submit an application to Xcel for the CSG, entering the queue for review of the system and interconnection to the power grid. If approved, the project would be constructed in summer of 2016 and be online in late fall 2016. Follow on agreements may include the City of Edina subscribing for a small portion of the project to be used as subscriber-of-last resort to secure financing and reduce risk of subscription transfer and cancelation to operator. Attachments: Lease and attachments Example Financial Analysis CEF Proposal Summary 1 LEASE AND SOLAR EASEMENT This Lease and Solar Easement (“Lease”) is entered into and effective on November 16, 2015 (“Effective Date”) between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (with its successors and assignees, “Lessor”), and CEF Edina Community Solar, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (with its permitted successors and assignees, “Lessee”). Lessor and Lessee may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” RECITALS 1. Lessor is the owner of real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota and more specifically described in Exhibit A (the “Lessor Property”). Lessor owns and operates a public works building on part of the Lessor Property as described in Exhibit A (the “PW Building”). 2. Lessee is engaged in the business of developing, constructing, owning and operating solar energy conversion facilities for the production of electricity and sale of such electricity at wholesale, including community solar gardens pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 216B.1641 (2013). 3. Lessee wishes to lease a portion of the Lessor Property to install and operate a solar photovoltaic energy conversion facility on the roof of the PW Building, together with a related solar easement, and Lessor is willing to grant Lessee a lease and easement in accordance with the terms of this Lease. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and the mutual promises and other consideration set forth below, the adequacy and receipt of which is acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee agree as follows: ARTICLE I. Premises Section 1.1 General (a) Lessor leases to Lessee and Lessee leases from Lessor the real property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Premises”) for the purposes of (i) monitoring, testing and assessing the Premises for solar photovoltaic energy generation, and (ii) developing, constructing, installing, operating and maintaining photovoltaic electric energy generating equipment, supporting structures and ballasts, inverters, electrical transformers, fixtures, electric distribution and transmission lines, communication lines, metering equipment, interconnection facilities and related facilities and equipment (collectively, the “Facility”) on the Premises and Transmission Premises. Lessee’s rights under this Lease with respect to the Premises shall be exclusive and Lessor acknowledges that Lessor may not grant any other person or entity any such rights. (b) Lessee shall use the Premises only for the evaluation, development, construction, installation, maintenance, and operation of the Facility. Any improvements, fixtures or structures other than the Facility shall not be installed without the express written consent of Lessor. Subject to Section 4.6, Lessee shall also be entitled to ingress and egress to and from its Facility and appurtenant equipment and electrical power lines and Lessor grants Lessee an access easement (“Access Easement”) through that portion of the Lessor Property identified on Exhibit A as the “Access Premises” for purposes of Lessee’s access to the Facility on the Premises. (c) Lessor grants Lessee an easement on and through that portion of the Lessor Property described in Exhibit A (the “Transmission Premises”) for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining an electric distribution line and related communication lines between the Facility and electrical facilities owned by NSP at the NSP Interconnection Point. Lessor shall not plant trees, excavate, install improvements, or otherwise undertake activities within the Transmission Premises which will interfere with Lessee’s electric or distribution facilities. (d) Prior to construction of the Facility, subject to Section 4.6, Lessee may engage in assessment, development and design activities on the Premises, including, but not limited to (i) feasibility studies, including measurement of sunlight or solar energy potential and other meteorological data; (ii) design, siting and analysis of proposed Facility; and (iii) such other tests, analysis or studies as may be required by permitting agencies or as Lessee deems advisable including analysis of Lessee’s electrical system. Lessee may install one or more measuring devices on the Premises as necessary to measure its solar characteristics. (e) Lessee reserves the right to relocate or reconfigure the Facility upon the PW Building during the term of this Lease, subject to Lessor’s approval if relocation or reconfiguration materially affects the PW Building or its use by Lessor or continuing compliance of the Facility with all requirements of this Lease. Lessor shall retain the right to use that portion of the Premises, PW Building, and Lessor Property not occupied by the Facility to the extent its use is consistent with Sections 1.2 and 5.2, for all purposes. Lessee agrees to cooperate with Lessor to locate the Facility on the Premises in a manner that minimizes interference with the activities of Lessor and the operation of the PW Building. In this respect, Lessor agrees to provide Lessee with any information needed to locate the Facility to reduce the effect on Lessor and the PW Building, including electrical plans, plot layouts, and similar data. (f) Lessor shall provide Lessee with copies of the plans and specifications in its possession for the roof and related structural components of the PW Building necessary for Lessee to design its Facility. Lessor shall not be obligated to create any new plans or specifications. The Facility shall be designed so as to not overload or unduly stress the structural or roof components, or otherwise adversely affect the functionality, of the PW Building and shall comply with all Applicable Laws. Lessor shall have the right to review Lessee’s proposed design and specifications in order to identify any potential adverse effects on the PW Building or costs to Lessor and to suggest modifications which will reduce or eliminate such costs or effects. Section 1.2 Solar Easement (a) Lessor hereby grants Lessee an exclusive easement to use all sunlight which naturally arrives at the Premises, including an exclusive easement prohibiting any obstruction to the free flow of sunlight to the Premises throughout the entire area of the Lessor Property described on Exhibit B (the “Easement Premises”), which shall consist horizontally three hundred and sixty degrees (360º) from any point where any photovoltaic generating facility is or may be located at any time from time to time (each such location referred to as a “Solar Site”) and for a distance from each Solar Site to the boundaries of the Easement Premises, together vertically through all space located above the surface of the Easement Premises, that is, one hundred eighty degrees (180º) or such greater number or numbers of degrees as may be necessary to extend from each point on and along a line drawn along the plane from each point along the exterior boundary of the Easement Premises through each Solar Site to each point and on and along such line to the opposite exterior boundary of the Easement Premises. Trees, structures and improvements located on the Easement Premises as of the date of this Lease shall be allowed to remain and Lessee may not require their removal. Lessor may not place or plant any trees, structures or improvements on the Easement Premises after the date of this Lease which may, in Lessee’s reasonable judgment, impede, diminish or interfere with the receipt of sunlight at any Solar Site, unless Lessor has received approval from Lessee for installation of any such trees, structure or improvement. In the event Lessor places or plants trees, structures or improvements on the Easement Premises which violate the provisions of this Section 1.2, Lessee may notify Lessor and request removal of the applicable tree, structure or improvement, or modification thereof to comply with this Section 1.2, within thirty (30) days. (b) Lessor further grants to Lessee an easement and license for the Facility to create, cause, increase, accentuate, or otherwise contribute to the occurrence of light, shadows, shadow and light flickering, glare and reflection, on and across the Premises and Lessor Property, and Lessor waives and releases any claims or causes of action arising from or related to the occurrence of any such events. ARTICLE II. Lease Term Section 2.1 Lease Term. The term of this Lease shall commence upon the date it is executed and delivered by both Parties and continue until the date that is twenty-five (25) years from the Commencement Date (as defined below) unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms (“Term”). Section 2.2 Termination of Lease The occurrence of any of the following events shall terminate this Lease: (a) The expiration of the Term as set forth in Section 2.1; or (b) The written agreement of the Parties to terminate this Lease; or (c) An uncured material breach of this Lease by either Party and the election of the non-breaching Party to terminate the Lease pursuant to Article IX; or (d) Either Lessee or Lessor terminates the Lease pursuant to Section 3.1(a), or Lessee terminates the Lease pursuant to Section 8.1. ARTICLE III. Rent and Taxes Section 3.1 Rent (a) Lessee shall pay Lessor an amount annually as Rent for the period of time between the date of this Lease and the Commencement Date as set forth in Exhibit C. The “Commencement Date” shall be the first day of the first full month after the Facility commences commercial production and sale of electricity on the Premises under the PPA. The Commencement Date shall occur prior to December 31, 2016. If the Commencement Date does not occur by that date, except as such period may be extended by Force Majeure or agreement of the Parties, either Lessee or Lessor shall have the option to terminate the Lease, in which case neither Lessee nor Lessor shall have any further obligations under this Lease and Lessee shall have no further obligation to pay Rent to Lessor. All Rent obligations arising under this Lease shall be prorated for any partial year. (b) The twelve (12) month periods beginning with the Commencement Date and each anniversary of the Commencement Date shall each be a Lease Year. Beginning with the Commencement Date, Lessee shall pay to Lessor an annual rental payment as set forth in Exhibit D (together with payments due prior to the Commencement Date, “Rent”). Section 3.2 Payments Lessee shall make the initial payment of Rent for the first year as set forth in Section 3.1(a) within ten (10) days of the Effective Date and on the anniversary date of the Effective Date of the Lease thereafter until the Commencement Date. Lessee shall pay Lessor Rent for the first full Lease Year no later than ten (10) days after the Commencement Date. On each anniversary of the Commencement Date, Lessee shall pay Lessor the annual Rent due in advance for the following Lease Year. Section 3.3 Taxes, Assessments and Utilities (a) Lessor shall pay, when due, all real property taxes and assessments levied against the Lessor Property and Premises and all personal property taxes and assessments levied against the PW Building or any other personal property on the Lessor Property. Subject to Section 3.3 (c), if Lessor shall fail to pay any such taxes or assessments when due, Lessee may, at its option, pay those taxes and assessments and any accrued interest and penalties, and deduct the amount of its payment from any Rent otherwise due to Lessor from Lessee. (b) Lessee shall pay all personal property and other taxes and assessments levied against the Facility when due including any equipment or property within the Access Premises or Transmission Premises. If the Lessor Property or Premises experiences any increase in the amount of real property taxes assessed against it as a result of the installation of the Facility on the Premises, including any reclassification of the Lessor Property or Premises pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 272.02, subd. 24 (2013) or otherwise, Lessee shall pay or reimburse Lessor an amount equal to the increase caused by the Facility no later than ten (10) days prior to the date each year on which the applicable real estate taxes are due to be paid by Lessor, provided that not less than thirty (30) days prior to such due date Lessor provides Lessee with copies of the applicable current and past statements of real estate taxes payable for the Lessor Property or Premises and any related information demonstrating the increase was caused by the Facility and the amount of the increase. (c) Either Party may contest the validity or amount of any levied taxes, assessments or other charges for which each is responsible under this Lease as long as such contest is pursued in good faith and with due diligence and the Party contesting the tax, assessment or charge has paid the obligation in question or established adequate reserves to pay the obligation in the event of an adverse determination. (d) Lessee shall pay for all water, electric, telecommunications and any other utility services used by the Facility or Lessee on the Premises. Section 3.4 Interconnection of Electrical Facilities Lessee shall interconnect the Facility with NSP at the location and in the manner described in Exhibit B (“NSP Interconnection Point”) unless otherwise required by NSP. Lessee will not be allowed to interconnect with the electrical system of the PW Building or of Lessor on the Lessor Property. As between Lessor and Lessee, Lessee shall be responsible for all costs of designing, procuring, installing, maintaining and operating any equipment or facilities necessary to interconnect the Facility at the NSP Interconnection Point, and to permit the receipt, transmission, and delivery of the electricity produced by the Facility to NSP. Lessee shall design, install, operate and maintain all interconnection facilities and equipment, meters and other electrical equipment so as to prevent any adverse effect on Lessor, the PW Building or Lessor’s operations and activities on the Lessor Property. Section 3.5 Disclaimer of Title to Environmental Attributes (a) Lessor agrees that all Environmental Attributes, as defined in Exhibit E, remain the property of Lessee irrespective of whether Lessor consumes or uses any of the electricity generated by the Facility, and Lessor has no title or right to any such Environmental Attributes related to, arising from or associated with the Facility or any electrical capacity or energy created by the Facility. (b) As between the Parties, any grant, rebate, incentive payment, bill credit, tax credit or any other cash or tax benefit arising from or associated with the installation or ownership of the Facility or the production of energy and capacity by the Facility, shall enure to the exclusive benefit of Lessee, including, but not limited to, any production tax credit or investment tax credit pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Sections 45 and 48 or similar state tax law provisions; the made-in- Minnesota rebates pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 116C.7791 (2013); the rebates available through NSP’s “Solar Rewards” program and bill credits arising under NSP’s community solar garden tariffs or program. Lessor shall cooperate with Lessee in any applications for such benefits or credits to the extent Lessor’s participation is necessary for eligibility, and if any such program or benefit requires the Lessor to be the recipient, Lessor agrees to assign or reimburse any such amounts received to Lessee. Section 3.7 Community Solar Garden. (a) The Parties agree that the Facility is intended to qualify as a community solar garden (“CSG”) pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 216B.1641 (2013), orders of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission in Docket No. E-002/M-13-867 or related dockets, applicable NSP tariffs, and all related orders, regulations and interpretations, in each case as modified and amended (“CSG Laws”). As a condition precedent to Lessor’s obligation to allow commencement of construction of the Facility under this Lease, Lessee shall submit an application to NSP pursuant to the CSG Laws, within 10 days after execution and delivery of this Lease and completion of the necessary structural engineering and sizing design for the Facility, for approval of the Facility as a CSG in accordance with the CSG Laws and for interconnection, and shall receive such approval from NSP, including approval of interconnection of the Facility with NSP at the NSP Point of Interconnection, prior to September 15, 2016. (b) Lessor agrees to cooperate with any application by Lessor for approval of the Facility as a CSG or for interconnection of the Facility by providing information within its possession, custody and control. (c) Lessee shall seek subscribers to participate in the Facility as a CSG from residential NSP customers residing in Edina, and shall provide a preference for such residents to become subscribers conditioned on the potential subscriber’s eligibility under the CSG Laws and execution and delivery of a subscription agreement with Lessee. Subscription agreements with Edina residents shall not require the subscriber to pay the entire cost of the subscription in advance, but shall provide for subscribers to pay for their allocation of bill credits on a monthly basis as such credits are received and in proportion to the amount of credits created and received. Subscription agreements shall also provide for a minimum annual production guarantee and other terms consistent with Lessee’s proposal submitted to and selected by Lessor, and Lessor shall be entitled to review proposed or executed subscription agreements to ascertain such consistency. Lessee shall provide a mechanism for substitute or replacement subscribers to minimize any difference between the capacity of the Facility and the subscribed capacity upon the departure of any subscribers, including, but not limited to, a subscription agreement with one or more subscribers who can absorb such available subscription capacity. Lessee and Lessor shall agree on a form for a subscription agreement within 30 days of execution of this Lease. Lessee’s subscription agreements with Edina residents shall not be amended or modified after execution and delivery in a manner inconsistent with such proposed terms. (d) In the event Lessee is unable to fully subscribe the Facility with Edina residents within six months after commencing its subscription marketing, Lessee shall be entitled to accept subscribers from NSP commercial customers located in Edina for another three months and then, if subscription capacity remains unfilled, any other eligible NSP customers. ARTICLE IV. Lessee’s Covenants Lessee covenants, represents and warrants to Lessor as follows: Section 4.1 Liens Lessee shall keep the Premises and Lessor Property free and clear of all liens and claims of liens for labor, materials, services, supplies and equipment performed on or furnished to Lessee or the Facility on the Premises, Access Premises, or Transmission Premises, or in connection with Lessee’s use of the Premises, Access Premises, or Transmission Premises. Lessee may contest any such lien, but shall post a bond or utilize other available means to remove any lien that is created during the contested proceeding. Lessee agrees to otherwise remove any lien or encumbrance for which it is responsible pursuant to this paragraph within ninety (90) days of the creation of any such lien or encumbrance. Section 4.2 Permits and Laws (a) Lessee and its subcontractors, agents and designees shall at all times comply with all Applicable Laws with respect to Lessee’s activities pursuant to this Lease and shall obtain all permits, licenses and authorizations required to conduct any and all such activities. (b) Lessee shall design, construct, install and operate the Facility and any related equipment in accordance with Prudent Electric Industry Practice, all Requirements of Law, any local electrical code, and the requirements of NSP. In particular, Lessee shall comply with all Environmental Laws. Section 4.3 Lessee’s Improvements (a) The Facility and related equipment constructed, installed or placed on the Premises and within the Transmission Premises by Lessee pursuant to this Lease shall be the sole property of Lessee, and Lessor shall have no ownership or other interest in the Facility and related equipment owned by Lessee on the Premises or within the Transmission Premises. The Facility is and shall remain personalty of the Lessee, notwithstanding any present or future common ownership of the Facility and the Premises, and irrespective of whether any of the Facility is deemed to be a fixture or otherwise part of the Lessor Property or PW Building, and Lessor acknowledges that the Facility is and shall remain personal property of Lessee irrespective of the manner of its attachment or connection to the Lessor Improvements. Lessor acknowledges that Lenders may request a first priority security interest in the Facility as collateral for financing of the Facility, and Lessor consents to the grant by Lessee of such a security interest, and the filing of instruments necessary to perfect such a security interest under the Uniform Commercial Code in the Facility as personal property of the Lessee. (b) Throughout the Term Lessee shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain Lessee’s Facility in good condition and repair, ordinary wear and tear excepted. Any portion of the Facility constructed, installed or placed on the Premises or Transmission Premises by Lessee pursuant to this Lease may be replaced, repaired or refurbished by Lessee at any time. At the end of the Term, including any termination of the Lease, Lessee shall remove the Facility within three (3) months from the date the Term expires or the Lease terminates. If Lessee fails to remove any portion of the Facility within the required time period, that portion of the Facility shall be considered abandoned by Lessee and Lessor may remove that portion of the Facility from the Premises and dispose of it in its sole discretion without notice or liability to Lessee. In the event Lessee fails to remove any of the Facility as required, and Lessor removes any portion of the Facility at Lessor’s expense, Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for all reasonable costs of removing that portion of the Facility as required by the Lease, less any salvage or resale value received by Lessor, within thirty days after receipt of an invoice from Lessor. (c) Lessee shall use reasonable care in the installation and construction of the Facility so as to avoid damage to the PW Building and Lessor Property and risk of injury to Lessor’s employees, customers, tenants, guests and invitees. Lessee shall secure its equipment, interests and supplies during construction, and remove any construction debris on a regular basis. Section 4.4 Hazardous Wastes Lessee shall not use, store, dispose of or release on the Premises or Lessor Property or cause or permit to exist or be used, stored, disposed of or released on the Premises as a result of Lessee’s activities, any Hazardous Substances, except in such quantities as may be required in its normal business operations and only if such use is not harmful to Lessor and is in full compliance with all Environmental Laws. Section 4.5 Insurance (a) Lessee shall obtain and maintain in force the policies of insurance covering the Facility and Lessee’s activities on the Premises and Lessor Property at all times during the Term as described in Exhibit D. Such insurance coverage for the Facility, Premises, Access Premises and Transmission Premises may be provided as part of a blanket policy that covers other facilities or properties as well. (b) Lessor shall procure and maintain comprehensive general liability insurance or self-insure with respect to the Lessor Property and PW Building, including coverage for property damage and bodily injury or death to any person. Section 4.6 Notice of Access Without limiting or reducing the rights of access granted to Lessee pursuant to the Access Easement and this Lease, to the extent Lessee’s access to the Facility can only be accomplished by entry to, on, or through or over the Lessor Property and PW Building, Lessee agrees to give Lessor reasonable notice before any entry in, through or over the Lessor Property or PW Building by Lessee or its agents, employees and contractors. Lessee and its agents, employees and contractors shall comply with any reasonable safety and security instructions of Lessor while present on the Premises, the Access Premises or the Transmission Premises. The Parties will agree on mutually acceptable locations and means by which Lessee may access the Facility and Premises. Section 4.7 PW Building Roof With respect to the roof of the PW Building on which any portion of the Facility is located, Lessee shall be responsible for the costs to repair or replace any roof membrane or other components damaged or adversely affected by installation of the Facility at Lessee’s expense. Lessor represents that the roof was installed in 2010 and that the expected life of the current roof is 30 years. In the event that any portion of the roof requires repair or replacement during the Term and the repair or replacement will require the movement or disconnection of any portion of the Facility, Lessor and Lessee agree to cooperate to minimize the dislocation or disconnection of the affected Facility and the duration of any such relocation or disconnection and to use commercially reasonable efforts to schedule such work for periods when solar energy production is lowest. Rent shall be abated for the period, and to the extent of, any such relocation or disconnection. ARTICLE V. Lessor Covenants Lessor covenants, represents and warrants to Lessee as follows: Section 5.1 Title and Authority Lessor is the sole owner of the Lessor Property, PW Building, Easement Premises and Premises in fee simple and each person or entity signing the Lease on behalf of Lessor has the full and unrestricted authority to execute and deliver this Lease and to grant the easements and rights granted herein. All persons having any ownership interest in the Lessor Property, PW Building, Easement Premises and Premises are signing this Lease as Lessor. When signed by Lessor, this Lease constitutes a valid and binding agreement enforceable against Lessor in accordance with its terms. There are no encumbrances or liens against the Lessor Property or Premises except as recorded with the County Recorder for Hennepin County. Lessor agrees to deliver any documents necessary to correct any title defects which would, if not corrected, adversely affect Lessee’s rights hereunder or its ability to obtain and maintain financing of the Facility. Section 5.2 Quiet Enjoyment Lessee shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Premises, Easement Premises, Access Premises and Transmission Premises in accordance with the terms of this Lease without any interference of any kind by Lessor or any person claiming through Lessor. Lessor and its activities on the Premises, Access Premises and Transmission Premises and any grant of rights Lessor makes to any other person shall not interfere with any of Lessee’s activities pursuant to this Lease, and Lessor shall not interfere with any of Lessee’s activities pursuant to this Lease, and Lessor shall not interfere or allow interference with the receipt of sunlight over the Easement Premises or otherwise engage in activities which might impede or decrease the output or efficiency of the Facility, except as otherwise permitted pursuant to this Lease. Section 5.3 Cooperation Lessor shall cooperate with Lessee to obtain and maintain any approvals, authorization and permits needed in connection with the analysis, development, construction, maintenance, and operation of the Facility. Lessor shall also provide Lessee with such further assurances and shall execute any estoppels, certificates, consents to assignments or additional documents that may be reasonably necessary for recording purposes or requested by Lessee or any of its Lenders. Section 5.4 No Marketing of Environmental Attributes Lessor acknowledges that Lessee retains all rights to any Environment Attributes arising from the Facility and the electricity produced by the Facility and that Lessor is not acquiring any rights or interests in any Environmental Attributes pursuant to this Lease. Lessee’s Environmental Attributes include all rights to report, market and otherwise receive credit for the creation of electricity using the Facility. Lessor agrees not to publicize, report, market or otherwise take credit for the creation or use of the Environmental Attributes or electricity from the Facility in any manner which would interfere with the Lessee’s rights to such Environmental Attributes or diminish the value of Lessee’s Environmental Attributes. Lessor and Lessee shall cooperate to identify appropriate public statements which Lessor may use regarding the Facility that will not interfere with Lessee’s Environmental Attributes. ARTICLE VI. Indemnification Section 6.1 Indemnification (a) Each Party (the “Indemnifying Party”) agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other Party and the other Party’s elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, employees, representatives, and agents (collectively the “Indemnified Party”) against any and all losses, damages, claims, expenses and liabilities for physical damage to property and for physical injury to any person, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees (“Damages”), to the extent resulting from or arising out of (i) any operations or activities of the Indemnifying Party on the Lessor Property or Premises; (ii) any negligent or intentional act or omission on the part of the Indemnifying Party; or (iii) any breach of this Lease by the Indemnifying Party. Nothing in this Section shall relieve Lessor or Lessee of any liability to the other for any breach of the Lease. This indemnification obligation shall apply notwithstanding any negligent or intentional acts, errors or omissions of the indemnities but the Indemnifying Party’s liability to pay damages to the Indemnified Party shall be reduced in proportion to the percentage by which the indemnities negligent or intentional acts, errors or omissions caused the Damages. Neither Party shall be indemnified for its Damages resulting from its sole negligence or intentional wrongful acts. These indemnity provisions shall not be construed to relieve any insurer of its obligations to pay claims consistent with the provisions of a valid insurance policy. This indemnification provision shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. (b) Lessee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Lessor and its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees and agents against any and all suits, actions, response actions, orders, losses, damages, civil or criminal penalties, fees, costs, expenses, claims or liabilities (including without limitation, attorneys’ fees and expenses) arising out of, or in connection with, the release (or alleged release) of any Hazardous Substances introduced to or handled on the Lessor Property by Lessee or its contractors, suppliers, or agents, or violations (or alleged violations) of any Environmental Laws by the Lessee or its officers, employees, agents, contractors or suppliers, including without limitation, with respect to damage to property, including the costs of investigation, cleanup, removal, remedial, corrective or response action. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, Lessee shall not be responsible for any Damages to the extent attributable to Hazardous Substances present on the Lessor Property prior to the Effective Date or introduced or handled by Lessor or its agents, contractors and representatives. Section 6.2 Damage to Lessor Improvements In the event Lessor suffers damage to the Lessor Property or any improvements on the Lessor Property during Lessee’s construction, installation, operation and maintenance of the Facility on the Premises, Access Premises, and Transmission Premises. Lessee shall reimburse Lessor for the costs to repair or replace any such damage or pay Lessor fair compensation for any such losses or damage. ARTICLE VII. Assignment; Encumbrance of Lease Section 7.1 Right to Encumber (a) Lessee may at any time mortgage or encumber all or any part of its interest in the Lease and rights under this Lease and/or enter into a collateral assignment of all or any part of its interest in the Lease or rights under this Lease to any entity providing equity or debt financing for the Facility (“Lender”) without the consent of Lessor. Any Lender shall have no obligations under this Lease until such time as it exercises its rights to acquire Lessee’s interests subject to the lien of Lender’s mortgage by foreclosure or otherwise assumes the obligations of Lessee directly. Lessee shall notify Lessor of the identity and notice address for any Lender. (b) Lessor and Lessee agree that, once all or any part of Lessee’s interests in the Lease are mortgaged or assigned to a Lender, they will not modify or terminate this Lease without the prior written consent of the Lender. Lessee agrees to cooperate with any Lender and agrees to negotiate in good faith with respect to any modifications to this Lease which may be requested by any Lender. (c) Lessor agrees that any Lender shall have the right to make any payment and to do any other act or thing required to be performed by Lessee under this Lease, and any such payment, act or thing performed by Lender shall be as effective to prevent a default under this Lease and any forfeiture of any of Lessee’s rights under this Lease as if done by Lessee itself. (d) During the time all or any part of Lessee’s interests in the Lease are mortgaged or assigned to any Lender, if Lessee defaults under any of its obligations and Lessor is required to give Lessee notice of the default Lessor shall also be required to give Lender notice of the default at the address provided by Lessor pursuant to Section 7.1(a). If Lessor becomes entitled to terminate this Lease due to an uncured default by Lessee, Lessor will not terminate this Lease unless it has first given written notice of the uncured default and of its intent to terminate this Lease to the Lender and has given the Lender at least thirty (30) days to cure the default to prevent termination of this Lease. If within such thirty (30) day period the Lender notifies the Lessor that it must foreclose on Lessee’s interest or otherwise take possession of Lessee’s interest under this Lease in order to cure the default, Lessor shall not terminate this Lease and shall permit the Lender a reasonable period of time necessary for the Lender, with the exercise of due diligence, to foreclose or acquire Lessee’s interest under this Lease and to perform or cause to be performed all of the covenants and agreements to be performed and observed by Lessee. The time within which Lender must foreclose or acquire Lessee’s interest shall be extended to the extent Lender is prohibited by an order or injunction issued by a court or the operation of any bankruptcy or insolvency law from commencing or prosecuting the necessary foreclosure or acquisition. The extension of time provided for foreclosure shall not apply to defaults consisting solely of a failure to pay Rent or other amounts due Lessor. (e) The acquisition of all or any part of Lessee’s interests in the Lease by any Lender through foreclosure or other judicial or non-judicial proceedings in the nature of foreclosure, or by any conveyance in lieu of foreclosure, shall not require the consent of Lessor nor constitute a breach or default of this Lease by Lessee, and upon the completion of the acquisition or conveyance Lessor shall acknowledge and recognize Lender as Lessee’s proper successor under this Lease upon Lender’s cure of any existing Lessee defaults and assumption of the obligations of Lessee under this Lease prospectively. (f) In the event this Lease is rejected by a trustee or a debtor-in-possession in any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding Lessor agrees, upon request by any Lender within thirty (30) days after the rejection or termination and subject to the continuing qualification of the Facility as a CSG under the CSG Laws, to execute and deliver to Lessee or Lender a new Lease for the Premises which (i) shall be effective as of the date of the rejection or termination of this Lease, (ii) shall be for a term equal to the remainder of the term of the Lease before giving effect to such rejection or termination, and (iii) shall contain the same terms, covenants, agreements, provisions, conditions and limitations as are contained in this Lease (except for any obligations or requirements which have been fulfilled by Lessee or Lender prior to rejection or termination). Prior to the execution and delivery of any such new lease Lessee, or Lender shall (i) pay Lessor any amounts which are due Lessor from Lessee, (ii) pay Lessor any and all amounts which would have been due under this Lease but for the rejection or termination from the date of the rejection or termination to the date of the new lease, (iii) agree in writing to perform or cause to be performed all of the other covenants and agreements to be performed by Lessee under this Lease to the extent Lessee failed to perform them prior to the execution and delivery of the new lease; and (iv) confirm or reestablish eligibility of the Facility as a CSG under the CSG Laws then in effect. Section 7.2 Assignment Lessee may not assign, sublease, transfer or convey any portion of its interests in this Lease without the prior written consent of Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, except for (i) assignment of its rights in their entirety to an entity created to own and operate the Facility and which is owned by Lessee, and (ii) any collateral assignment to a Lender as set forth in Section 7.1(a). Lessor shall notify Lessee of any such assignment. Any other such purported assignment, sublease, transfer or conveyance without the required consent from Lessor shall be void. Section 7.3 Continuing Nature of Obligations (a) The solar easement and related rights granted by Lessor in this Lease to Lessee are an easement in gross, representing interests personal to and for the benefit of Lessee, its successors and assigns, as owner of the rights created by the easement. The easement and other rights granted by Lessor in this Lease are independent of any lands or estates or interest in lands, there is no other real property benefiting from the solar easement and related rights granted in this Lease and, as between the Premises and other tracts of property, no tract is considered dominant or servient as to the other. (b) The burdens of the solar easement and all other rights granted to Lessee in this Lease shall run with and against the Premises and the Easement Premises and shall be a charge and burden on the Premises and the Easement Premises and shall be binding upon and against Lessor and its successors, assigns, permittees, licensees, lessees, employees and agents. The Lease, including the solar easement, shall inure to the benefit of Lessee and its permitted successors, assigns, permittees, licensees and lessees. Lessor acknowledges that any sale or conveyance of the Lessor Property or PW Building shall be subject to the leasehold and easement interests of Lessee in this Lease. ARTICLE VIII. Condemnation/Force Majeure Section 8.1 Condemnation If eminent domain proceedings are commenced against all or any portion of the Premises, and the taking and proposed use of such property would prevent or adversely affect Lessee’s construction, installation or operation of the Facility on the Premises or related facilities, the Parties shall either amend this Lease to reflect any necessary relocation of the Facility which will preserve the value and benefit of the Lease to Lessee, together with any corresponding payments, or, at Lessee’s option, this Lease may be terminated, provided that any such termination shall not terminate Lessee’s rights to participate in any condemnation proceedings or to any award in its favor as set forth in Section 8.2. Section 8.2 Proceeds All payments made by a condemnor on account of a taking by eminent domain shall be the property of the Lessor, except that Lessee shall be entitled to any award or amount paid for the reasonable costs of removing or relocating any of the Facility or the loss of any of the Facility or the loss of use of the Premises pursuant to the Lease. Lessee shall have the right to participate in any condemnation proceedings to this extent. Lessee’s right to compensation as set forth in this Section 8.2 shall survive the termination of this Lease or the taking by the condemnor of possession of the Premises, Access Premises, Transmission Premises, or Lessor Property. Section 8.3 Force Majeure Neither Lessor nor Lessee shall be liable to each other, or be permitted to terminate this Lease, for any failure to perform an obligation of this Lease to the extent such performance is prevented by a Force Majeure, which shall mean an event beyond the control of the Party affected and which, by exercise of due diligence and foresight, could not reasonably have been avoided, and includes, but is not limited to, fire, earthquake, flood, hurricane, tornado, war, epidemics, riot or civil strife, strikes or labor disputes, or the action by any governmental authority to prohibit the performance of the applicable obligation for reasons not attributable to the affected Party. The affected Party shall notify the other Party of the occurrence of the Force Majeure and its effect on performance of the Lease and shall take all reasonable efforts to remove or overcome the effects of the Force Majeure preventing performance of its obligations under this Lease. ARTICLE IX. Default/Termination Section 9.1 Events of Default (a) Subject to Section 7.1, each of the following shall constitute an event of default that shall permit the non-defaulting Party to terminate this Lease or pursue other remedies available at law or equity. (i) any failure by Lessee to pay Rent if the failure to pay continues for thirty (30) days after written notice from Lessor to Lessee and any Lender; (ii) any failure by Lessee to obtain CSG approval from NSP for the Facility by August 15, 2016 or to maintain the Facility’s eligibility under the CSG Laws; or (iii) any other material breach of this Lease by either Party which continues for thirty (30) days after written notice of default from the non- defaulting Party or, if the cure will take longer than thirty (30) days, the length of time necessary to effect cure as long as the defaulting Party is making diligent efforts to cure during that time. (b) For all claims, causes of action and damages the Parties shall be entitled to the recovery of actual damages allowed by law unless otherwise limited by the Lease. Neither the enumeration of events of default in Section 9.1 nor the termination of this Lease by a non-defaulting Party shall limit the right of a non-defaulting Party to rights and remedies available at law, including, but not limited to, claims for breach of contract or failure to perform by the other Party and for direct damages incurred by the non-defaulting Party as a result of the termination of this Lease. Section 9.2 Surrender Upon the termination or expiration of this Lease, Lessee shall peaceably surrender the Premises to Lessor and remove the Facility from the Premises at Lessee’s expense as required under Section 4.3 of this Lease. Section 9.3 Specific Performance Lessor acknowledges and agrees that should Lessor breach any of its obligations hereunder or otherwise fail to permit Lessee to exercise any of the rights and privileges granted herein, damages would be difficult to calculate and money damages would not be sufficient to compensate Lessee for such breach. As a result, Lessee shall have the right to seek specific enforcement of this Lease. In that event, Lessor agrees that Lessee has no adequate remedy at law. Section 9.4 No Consequential Damages Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Lease, neither Lessee nor Lessor shall be entitled to, and each of them expressly waives, any and all rights to recover consequential, incidental, punitive, indirect or exemplary damages, including, but not limited to, loss of use, loss of revenues, loss of profit, interest charges, or cost of capital, however arising, whether in contract, tort, equity or otherwise, with respect to any claim, action or damages arising from or in connection with this Lease. ARTICLE X. Miscellaneous Section 10.1 Notice Notices, consents or other documents required or permitted by this Lease must be given by personal delivery, reputable overnight courier, telecopier or U.S. certified mail postage prepaid and shall be sent to the respective parties as follows: To Lessor: City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To Lessee: CEF Edina Community Solar, LLC C/o Cooperative Energy Futures 3500 Bloomington Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 (612) 568-2479 Notice shall be deemed delivered upon receipt or refusal, if personally delivered, upon the date of actually delivery or refusal shown on the courier’s delivery receipt if sent by overnight courier, and on the fourth business day after deposit in the U.S. mail if sent by certified mail. Any Party may change the address for notice by notice to the other Party. Section 10.2 No Third Party Beneficiaries Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to create any duty to, or standard of care with reference to, or liability to, any person not a party to this Agreement. Except for the rights of Lenders set forth above, no provision of this Lease is intended to nor shall it in any way inure to the benefit of any third party so as to constitute any such person a third party beneficiary under this Lease, or of any one or more of the terms of this Lease, or otherwise give rise to any cause of action in any person not a Party to this Lease. Section 10.3 Entire Agreement It is mutually understood and agreed that this Lease constitutes the entire agreement between Lessor and Lessee and supersedes any and all prior oral or written understandings, representations or statements, and that no understandings, representations or statements, verbal or written, have been made which modify, amend, qualify or affect the terms of this Lease except for the provisions of Lessee’s proposal, dated October 7, 2015, with which Lessee must comply in accordance with the terms of the Lease. This Lease may not be amended except in a writing executed by both Parties. Section 10.4 Governing Law This Lease is made in Minnesota and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. This instrument is exempt from Minnesota deed tax. Section 10.5 Cooperation Each of the Parties, without further consideration, agrees to execute and deliver such additional documents and take such action as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this Lease and to fulfill the obligations of the respective Parties. Section 10.6 Waiver Neither Party shall be deemed to have waived any provision of this Lease or any remedy available to it unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the Party against whom the waiver would operate. Any waiver at any time by either Party of its rights with respect to any rights arising in connection with this Lease shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to any subsequent or other matter. Section 10.7 Relationship of Parties The duties, obligations and liabilities of each of the Parties are intended to be several and not joint or collective. This Lease shall not be interpreted or construed to create an association, joint venture, fiduciary relationship or partnership between Lessor and Lessee or to impose any partnership obligation or liability or any trust or agency obligation or relationship upon either Party. Lessor and Lessee shall not have any right, power, or authority to enter into any agreement or undertaking for, or act on behalf of, or to act or be an agent or representative of, or to otherwise bind, the other Party. Section 10.8 Severability Should any provision of this Lease be or become void, illegal or unenforceable, the validity or enforceability of the other provisions of the Lease shall not be affected and shall continue in full force. The Parties will, however, use their best efforts to agree on the replacement of the void, illegal or unenforceable provisions with legally acceptable clauses which correspond as closely as possible to the sense and purpose of the affected provision and the Lease as a whole. Section 10.9 Counterparts This Lease may be executed in two or more counterparts and by different parties on separate counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and each of which shall be deemed an original. [Signature pages to follow] CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Its: ________________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ____________, 2015 by _________________, the _________________ of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. ________________________________ Notary Public CEF Edina Community Solar, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: Its: STATE OF ______________ ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ________________, 2015 by ________________________, the _________________________ of CEF Edina Community Solar, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public EXHIBIT A Description of Lessor Property, Premises, and Access and Transmission Premises 1. Lessor Property The Easterly 55 feet of Lot 3, and all of Lots 4, 5 and 6, Block 5, Edina Interchange Center, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2. Premises Those portions of the existing roof of the PW Building on which Lessee actually installs the Facility, as shown in the attached drawings, and which will be amended by as-built drawings upon completion of installation. 3. Access Premises Access to the Lessor Property will be through a gate at the entrance from Metro Boulevard during normal business hours or by appointment. Lessor will provide up to three double depth parking spaces for staging and laydown during construction, and temporary locations adjacent to the PW Building (to be determined by the parties) for use of a crane to lift materials to the roof. Access to the roof by Lessee’s personnel, unless otherwise agreed, shall be through the PW Building at stairwells near the northeast corner from ground level through the mezzanine to the roof. 4. Transmission Premises The Transmission Premises shall include that part of the Lessor Property on the southeast side of the central PW Building necessary to locate and install a production meter and disconnection switch and related equipment, a strip of land from that point east in which underground electrical and fiberoptic lines shall be located, and a small area near Metro Boulevard on which a transformer will be placed and interconnection facilities with NSP. A drawing is attached showing the expected locations, and as-built drawings will be provided upon completion of construction. 5. Easement Premises The Easterly 55 feet of Lot 3, and all of Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 5, Edina Interchange Center, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 22 23 EXHIBIT B NSP Interconnection Point Interconnection of the Facility with NSP will be at or near the southwest corner of the PW Building as shown on the drawing attached to Exhibit A unless otherwise required by NSP. EXHIBIT C RENT Rent shall equal $2500 per year for the period prior to the Commencement Date and $7500 for the first Lease Year. For subsequent Lease Years, Rent shall be escalated at the rate of 3% per year as shown below: Lease Year Rent ($) 1 7,500 2 7,725 3 7,957 4 8,195 5 8,441 6 8,695 7 8,955 8 9,224 9 9,501 10 9,786 11 10,079 12 10,382 13 10,693 14 11,014 15 11,344 16 11,685 17 12,035 18 12,396 19 12,768 20 13,151 21 13,546 22 13,952 23 14,371 24 14,802 25 15,246 Total: 273,443 EXHIBIT D INSURANCE 1. Lessee shall procure and maintain throughout the Term, at its own expense, the following policies of insurance: (a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability insurance that complies with the laws of Minnesota to the extent of statutory limits, if applicable including a waiver of subrogation to Lessor; (b) Comprehensive or Commercial General Liability insurance with bodily injury and property damage combined single limits of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, specific coverage for contractual liability encompassing the indemnification provisions in this Lease, broad form property damage liability, personal injury liability, explosion and collapse hazard coverage, and products/completed operations liability coverage; (c) Comprehensive automobile liability insurance to the extent applicable with bodily injury and property damage combined single limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence covering vehicles owned, hired, or non-owned; and (d) All other insurance required by Applicable Laws as deemed appropriate by Lessee. 2. All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be with an insurer authorized by law to do business in Minnesota. All insurers shall be issued from companies satisfactory to Lessor and have a rating of A- or better in the current A.M. Best Rating Guide. 3. The amounts of insurance required above may be satisfied by Lessee buying primary coverage in the amounts specified or by buying a separate excess umbrella liability policy together with the lower limit primary underlying coverage. The structure of the coverage is Lessee’s option, as long as the total amount of insurance meets the requirements of this Lease. 4. The policies required of Lessee shall be "occurrence" form policies. Lessee may not use "claims-made" form coverage to meet its obligations without the prior written consent of each such policy from Lessor. 5. Lessee’s Commercial General Liability policy and Umbrella or Excess Liability policies shall include each of the following endorsements, and its workers' compensation and automobile liability policies shall include endorsement (d) listed below: a. The City of Edina and its elected and appointed officials, directors, officers, employees and agents shall be additional insureds under all policies including ongoing operations and completed operations. b. The policies are to be primary with respect to the interest of the City of Edina, and its elected and appointed officials, directors, officers, employees and agents, and any other insurance maintained by any of them shall be excess and not contributory with Lessee’s insurance. c. Each insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Edina and its elected and appointed officials, directors, officers, employees, and agents. d. Notwithstanding any other provision of a policy, no policy shall be cancelled or changed in a material way by the insurer or expire without thirty (30) days prior written notice to Lessor. e. Each insurer shall expressly agree that (i) the procurement of the applicable policy and the inclusion of the City of Edina and other persons listed in Section 5(a) as additional insureds does not waive any of the defenses of governmental immunity available under Minnesota law as it now exists and as it may be amended in the future; (ii) the City of Edina shall be responsible for asserting any defense of governmental immunity and may do so at any time, including upon the timely request of the applicable carrier; and (iii) the insurance carrier shall not deny coverage under any policy nor deny any of the rights and benefits accruing to the City of Edina and other additional insureds under the applicable policy due to the availability of a governmental immunity defense unless and until a court of competent jurisdiction has confirmed the applicability of governmental immunity asserted by the City of Edina in a non-applicable final order or judgment. 6. Lessee or its insurers or agents shall provide Lessor with certificates of insurance evidencing the policies and endorsements described prior to commencing any physical activities on the Lessor Property. Failure to obtain the insurance coverage required shall in no way relieve or limit Lessee’s obligations and liabilities under other provisions of this Agreement. 7. If the Facility is destroyed or materially damaged, and there are sufficient insurance proceeds available to repair or replace the Facility, Lessee shall use such proceeds to cause the Facility to be rebuilt and placed in commercial operation as soon as practicable. EXHIBIT E Defined Terms The terms defined below, when capitalized and used in the Lease, shall have the meanings given to them in this Exhibit E. 1. Applicable Laws: All applicable laws, statutes, treaties, codes, ordinances, regulations, orders, licenses, permits, and rules of any governmental authority, now in effect or enacted in the future, as amended, and as interpreted and applied, and all applicable judicial, administrative, arbitration and regulatory decrees, judgments, injunctions, writs, orders, and awards. 2. Environmental Attributes: All attributes of an environmental or other nature that are created or otherwise arise from the Facility, generation of electricity using sunlight as a source of energy, either in its own right or in contrast to the generation of electricity using nuclear or fossil fuels or resources, including, but not limited to, tags, certificates or similar products or rights associated with solar energy as a “green” or “renewable” energy resource, including any and all environmental air quality credits, emissions reductions, allowances, offsets or other benefits related to the use of solar energy at the Lessor Property in a manner which reduces, displaces or offsets emissions resulting from fuel combustion pursuant to any existing or future international, federal, regional, state or local legislation, regulation or agreement or voluntary agreement, and the aggregate amount of credits, offsets or other benefits related to any environmental or renewable energy credit trading program, information system or tracking system associated with the energy generated from the Facility, and any credits, allowances, offsets, or emission or pollution reductions for substances such as mercury, nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, particulate matter, or other contaminants or air, water or soil under federal, state, regional or local law or any international regulatory or voluntary program, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and related Kyoto Protocol and similar or successor programs, agreements, laws and regulations. “Environmental Attributes” does not include investment tax credits, or any similar tax credits, or cash grants, production incentives or similar tax or cash benefits, whether or not such tax credits or cash benefits arise from or are related to the Facility’s use or generation of solar energy. 3. Environmental Law: Any federal, state and local laws, including statutes, regulations, rulings, orders, administrative interpretations and other governmental restrictions and requirements, relating to the production, handing, release, discharge, treatment or disposal of air pollutants, water pollutants, process waste water, Hazardous Substances, toxic substances or otherwise relating to the natural environment or natural resources, each as amended from time to time, including, but not limited to (i) the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.; (ii) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.; (iii) the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 6901 et. seq.; (iv) the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.; (v) the Toxic Substances Control Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq.; (vi) Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970; (vii) the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001 et seq.; and (viii) any other similar applicable federal, state or local law. 4. Hazardous Substance: (A) Any substance which is listed, defined, designated or classified under any Environmental Law as a (i) hazardous material, substance, constituent or waste, (ii) toxic material, substance, constituent or waste, (iii) radioactive material, substance, constituent or waste, (iv) dangerous material, substance, constituent or waste, (v) pollutant, (vi) contaminant, or (vii) special waste; (B) any material, substance, constituent or waste regulated under any Environmental Laws; or (C) petroleum, petroleum products, radioactive materials, polychlorinated biphenyl, pesticides, asbestos, or asbestos-containing materials. 5. NSP: Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, and its successors and assignees. 6. PPA: Any contract or agreement or other arrangement pursuant to which Lessee sells the electricity and related capacity to NSP or any other purchaser. 7. Prudent Electric Industry Practice: Those methods and that equipment, as changed from time to time, that are commonly used and accepted in electrical engineering and operations to operate electrical equipment lawfully and with safety, dependability and efficiency, including, but not limited to, the requirements of the National Electric Safety Code, the National Electrical Code, NSP, and any Requirement of Law. Inputs: Assumptions can be changed in the areas highlighted Disclaimer: This spreadsheet model is use at your own risk. City of Edina makes no guarantees for errors or omissions. AC capacity 576 kw All Subscriber's NPV*$226,790 Demand Metered 0.09914$ Annual Energy - All Subscribers 781,704 kwh Individual Sub's NPV $3,076 Small General Servi 0.12431$ Bill credit escalation 2.00%City Rent NPV $150,294 Residential Service 0.12743$ Discount rate 5.00%*Net Present Value uses discount rate Combination Not Applicable Annual Degredation 0.67% Subscription Percentage 100%Subscription Price 0.1425$ REC*$0.02 Starting bill credit rate $0.13125 Escalation 2%year 1-8 Subscription Size (kwh/yr)9,600 Start Year 2017 Escalation 0%year 9-25 Xcel FAQ regarding CSG: http://www.xcelenergy.com/staticfiles/xe-responsive/Admin/Managed%20Documents%20&%20PDFs/MN-SRC-Subscriber-FAQs.pdf Xcel Bill Rate Codes http://xcelenergy.com/staticfiles/xe-responsive/Admin/Managed%20Documents%20&%20PDFs/MN-SRC-Eligible-Billing-Rates.pdf Edina Public Works / Modified Solar Analysis Standard Inputs (Items highlighted in box)Outputs Bill Credit Types & Rates *Xcel Energy owns RECs Escalation Inputs (Items highlighted in box) Year Projected kWh - Entire Garden ALL Subscriber's kWh Payment to Garden Operator ($/kWh) Bill Credit Rate before REC ($/kWh) Bill Credit Rate with REC ($/kWh) ALL Subscriber's Payments to Garden Operator ALL Subscriber Bill Credit from Xcel ALL Subscriber's Savings Total # Subscriptions @ input kwh /yr Individual Subscriber Annual Savings RENT2017781,704 781,704 $0.1425 $0.1313 0.15125$ $111,393 $118,233 $6,840 81.4 $84 7,5002018776,467 776,467 $0.1454 $0.1339 0.15388$ $112,859 $119,479 $6,619 80.9 $82 7,7252019771,265 771,265 $0.1483 $0.1366 0.15655$ $114,345 $120,743 $6,398 80.3 $80 7,9572020766,097 766,097 $0.1512 $0.1393 0.15928$ $115,851 $122,027 $6,176 79.8 $77 8,1952021760,964 760,964 $0.1542 $0.1421 0.16207$ $117,376 $123,329 $5,953 79.3 $75 8,4412022755,866 755,866 $0.1573 $0.1449 0.16491$ $118,921 $124,650 $5,729 78.7 $73 8,6952023750,801 750,801 $0.1605 $0.1478 0.16781$ $120,487 $125,991 $5,504 78.2 $70 8,9552024745,771 745,771 $0.1637 $0.1508 0.17076$ $122,074 $127,352 $5,278 77.7 $68 9,2242025740,774 740,774 $0.1637 $0.1538 0.17378$ $121,256 $128,732 $7,476 77.2 $97 9,5012026735,811 735,811 $0.1637 $0.1569 0.17686$ $120,443 $130,133 $9,689 76.6 $126 9,7862027730,881 730,881 $0.1637 $0.1600 0.17999$ $119,636 $131,554 $11,917 76.1 $157 10,0792028725,984 725,984 $0.1637 $0.1632 0.18319$ $118,835 $132,995 $14,160 75.6 $187 10,3822029721,120 721,120 $0.1637 $0.1665 0.18646$ $118,039 $134,458 $16,419 75.1 $219 10,6932030716,289 716,289 $0.1637 $0.1698 0.18979$ $117,248 $135,941 $18,694 74.6 $251 11,0142031711,490 711,490 $0.1637 $0.1732 0.19318$ $116,462 $137,447 $20,985 74.1 $283 11,3442032706,723 706,723 $0.1637 $0.1766 0.19665$ $115,682 $138,974 $23,292 73.6 $316 11,6852033701,988 701,988 $0.1637 $0.1802 0.20018$ $114,907 $140,523 $25,616 73.1 $350 12,0352034697,284 697,284 $0.1637 $0.1838 0.20378$ $114,137 $142,094 $27,957 72.6 $385 12,3962035692,612 692,612 $0.1637 $0.1875 0.20746$ $113,372 $143,688 $30,315 72.1 $420 12,7682036687,972 687,972 $0.1637 $0.1912 0.21121$ $112,613 $145,304 $32,692 71.7 $456 13,1512037683,363 683,363 $0.1637 $0.1950 0.21503$ $111,858 $146,944 $35,086 71.2 $493 13,5462038678,784 678,784 $0.1637 $0.1989 0.21893$ $111,109 $148,607 $37,498 70.7 $530 13,9522039674,236 674,236 $0.1637 $0.2029 0.22291$ $110,364 $150,294 $39,930 70.2 $569 14,3712040669,719 669,719 $0.1637 $0.2070 0.22697$ $109,625 $152,005 $42,380 69.8 $607 14,8022041665,232 665,232 $0.1637 $0.2111 0.23111$ $108,890 $153,740 $44,850 69.3 $647 15,246 Total $2,887,781 $3,375,234 $487,453 $6,703 $273,443 NPV All Credits from Xcel NPV All Payment to operator NPV RENT NPV of ALL Subscriber's Savings NPV of Individual Subscriber Savings$118,233 $111,393 $7,500 $6,840 $84$113,789 $107,485 $7,357 $6,304 $78$109,518 $103,715 $7,217 $5,803 $72$105,411 $100,076 $7,079 $5,335 $67$101,463 $96,566 $6,944 $4,897 $62$97,667 $93,178 $6,813 $4,489 $57$94,016 $89,909 $6,682 $4,107 $53$90,506 $86,755 $6,555 $3,751 $48$87,131 $82,071 $6,431 $5,060 $66$83,885 $77,639 $6,308 $6,246 $81$80,762 $73,446 $6,188 $7,316 $96$77,760 $69,480 $6,070 $8,279 $109$74,871 $65,728 $5,954 $9,143 $122$72,093 $62,179 $5,841 $9,914 $133$69,420 $58,821 $5,729 $10,599 $143$66,849 $55,645 $5,621 $11,204 $152$64,375 $52,640 $5,513 $11,735 $160$61,995 $49,798 $5,408 $12,198 $168$59,705 $47,108 $5,305 $12,597 $175$57,502 $44,565 $5,204 $12,937 $181$55,382 $42,158 $5,105 $13,223 $186$53,341 $39,882 $5,008 $13,460 $190$51,378 $37,728 $4,913 $13,650 $194$49,488 $35,691 $4,819 $13,798 $198$47,670 $33,763 $4,727 $13,906 $201 $1,944,210 $1,717,419 $150,294 $226,790 $3,076 !! 1! ! ! ! ! ! City!of!Edina! Community!Solar! RFP!Response! ! October!7,!2015! City!of!Edina! !! 2! ! Attn.!Mr.!Ross!Bintner,!Environmental!Engineer! E;mail:!rbintner@edinamn.gov! ! Address:!!7450!Metro!Boulevard!! Phone:!952;903;5713! Edina,!MN!55439! ! Dear!Mr.!Ross!Bintner!and!City!of!Edina,! !! On!behalf!of!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!and!our!partners!at!Innovative!Power!Systems,!I’d!like! thank!you!for!considering!our!proposal!to!develop!a!Community!Solar!Garden!on!the!roof!of!the! Edina!Public!Works!Building.!Our!partnership!in!this!joint!proposal!unites!one!of!the!oldest!and! largest!solar!installers!in!the!state!with!a!Minnesota!pioneer!and!innovator!in!resident;focused! accessible!community!solar!gardens.!Together,!with!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!(CEF)!as! project!manager,!subscriber!engagement!coordinator,!and!long;term!operator!and!Innovative! Power!Systems!(IPS)!managing!design,!installation,!and!maintenance,!we!are!uniquely!qualified! to!deliver!a!high;quality,!low;cost!community!solar!garden!accessible!to!all!Edina!residents.! ! We!will!design!and!build!a!630.18kW!solar!array!on!the!roof!of!the!Edina!Public!Works! building,!and!market!community!solar!garden!subscriptions!to!Edina!residents!on!a!pay;as;you! go!basis.!We!will!deliver!immediate!savings!for!subscribers!on!their!energy!bills!while!using!a! subscription!structure!that!locks!in!prices!over!the!long!term,!protecting!subscribers!from! rising!electricity!prices!and!securing!stable,!affordable!energy!for!participating!Edina!residents.! We!will!use!a!robust!network!of!local!partnerships!to!promote!subscriptions,!using!an! innovative!financing!model!to!ensure!access!for!all!energy!users.! !! A!Community!Solar!Garden!starts!with!community!and!as!a!community;based!clean!energy! cooperative,!CEF!epitomizes!this!value.!!We!engage!solar!garden!subscribers!as!our!members,! joining!a!growing!base!of!Minnesotans!who!are!using!cooperative!clean!energy!development!to! keep!their!energy!dollars!local!and!save!money!through!energy!efficiency!and!renewable! energy.!Our!extensive!experience!in!neighborhood!outreach,!member!engagement,!and! business!models!that!build!wealth!for!community!members!serve!as!a!foundation!for!the!CEF! approach!to!community!solar.!We!believe!community!solar!gardens!should!enable!clean!energy! for!all,!and!have!structured!our!projects!to!live!out!this!value.!!We!focus!on!residential! subscribers,!access!for!all!energy!users!regardless!of!credit!level,!and!localized!solar!gardens! that!serve!the!communities!around!them.! ! Experience,!integrity!and!an!in;depth!understanding!of!all!aspects!of!the!solar!industry!make! IPS!the!perfect!partner!for!this!project.!!With!more!than!700!systems!in!operation,!IPS!has! !! 3! ! earned!a!reputation!for!getting!things!done.!!Owner!Ralph!Jacobson!has!been!a!strong!advocate! for!solar!since!the!1970’s,!and!was!recently!awarded!the!first!ever!Lifetime!Achievement!Award! by!the!Minnesota!Solar!Energy!Industry!Association,!a!group!he!co;founded!in!2008.!!IPS!has! been!active!in!the!formation!of!Minnesota’s!burgeoning!solar!industry,!and!helped!drive!efforts! to!create!the!Minnesota!community!solar!garden!program!being!used!in!this!RFP.!! ! CEF!and!IPS!are!supported!by!many!other!partners!to!make!our!community!solar!garden! approach!work.!In!particular,!we!work!with!Minnesota!Interfaith!Power!and!Light!to!engage! communities!of!faith!in!the!opportunity!of!solar!gardens,!and!with!Renewable!Energy!Partners! to!support!direct!workforce!development!in!the!solar!industry.!Around!each!project!we! develop,!we!form!a!network!of!grassroots!partners!to!spread!the!opportunity!of!community! solar!far!and!wide!–!we!have!already!made!exciting!progress!establishing!the!foundations!of!a! community!network!for!this!Edina!project.! ! We!are!excited!to!bring!cooperative!community!solar!to!Edina!residents!through!a!high!quality,! low;cost!solar!array!on!the!Edina!Public!Works!Building.!We!are!happy!to!answer!any!further! questions!not!covered!in!our!below!proposal,!and!again!appreciate!the!opportunity!to!offer!our! services!to!the!City!of!Edina!and!its!residents.! ! We!look!forward!to!hearing!from!you.! ! Sincerely,! !! ! Timothy(DenHerder/Thomas( General!Manager! Cooperative!Energy!Futures! 3500!Bloomington!Ave.!S,!! Minneapolis,!MN!55407! (612) 568-2334 ! www.cooperativeenergyfutures.com ! !! 4! ! ! Table(of(Contents( ! A. Description(of(Proposed(CSG(!!!!5!! ! B. Developer(Background(and(Experience!!!!!6! ! C. Lease/(Proposed(Rent!!!!!!!9! ! D. Subscription(Plan!!!!!!!10! ! E. Operation(and(Maintenance(Plan!!!!!14! ! F. Financing(Plan(!!!!!!!15! ! G. Schedule(!!!!!!!!16! ! H. Other(Benefits(to(the(City(!!!!!17! ! Exhibit(A:(Graphic(Depiction(of(Solar(Array(Design(!!18! ! Exhibit(B:(Specifications(of(Products(Used(!!!19! ! ( !! 5! ! A.(Description(of(Proposed(CSG.( ! (i)((((Equipment(–(solar(module,(inverter,(racking(system,(and(monitoring(equipment( ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!(CEF)!and!Innovative!Power!Systems!(IPS)!will!develop!a!solar!PV! array!of!630.18kW!(DC)!estimated!size!using!270W!Peimar!panels!mounted!at!a!20!degree!tilt! using!AET!Rayport!B!racking.!We!will!use!16!CPS!36kW!inverters!to!convert!power!into!AC! production!and!monitor!production!through!an!E;Gauge!monitoring!device!or!a!similar!real; time!production!monitor!with!internet;based!production!data!monitoring!available!to!the!City! of!Edina,!CEF!and!IPS,!and!project!subscribers.! ! See!Exhibit!B!(pg!19)!for!detailed!product!specifications!and!warranties.!Peimar!includes!a!30; year!power!production!warranty.!AET!racking!includes!a!15;year!warranty,!and!CPS!inverters! include!a!10;year!warranty.!O&M!reserves!(see!Operations!and!Maintenance!Plan!Section!E.! page!14)!will!cover!inverter!and!racking!replacements!when!necessary.! ! (ii)(((Array(capacity((DC(and(AC)(and(expected(annual(production.( ! The!DC!system!capacity!will!be!630.18kW.!We!reserve!the!right!to!make!final!revisions!to!this! system!size!after!engineering!review!and!final!analysis!of!shading!caused!by!antennas!and!roof; top!units,!with!the!City!of!Edina!having!right!to!sign;off!on!any!final!system!design.!We!project! an!AC!capacity!of!576kW!and!monthly!production!as!defined!below:! ! Month!AC!System! Output! (kWh)! Month!AC!System! Output! (kWh)! Month!AC!System! Output! (kWh)! Jan!47,096!May!87,783!Sep!67,909! Feb!55,385!Jun!87,931!Oct!54,621! Mar!69,655!Jul!89,323!Nov!35,830! Apr!70,927!Aug!80,371!Dec!34,872! !!!!TOTAL!781,704! (Source:!PV!Watts)! ! (iii)((Drawing(or(other(graphic(depiction(of(proposed(placement(on(PW(Building.(( See!Exhibit!A!(pg!18).! !! 6! ! B.((Developer(Background(and(Experience! ! (i)(Experience(with(solar(and(CSG(development,(including(other(proposed(NSP(projects.( ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!and!Innovative!Power!Systems!together!have!extensive!experience! in!both!the!technical!installation!and!maintenance!of!solar!arrays!and!the!development!of! community;based!energy!projects!for!residents.!Innovative!Power!Systems!will!play!an! engineering,!procurement!and!contracting!role,!while!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!will!manage! community!engagement,!cooperative!management!and!operations,!and!long;term!ownership!of! the!solar!gardens.! ! Cooperative(Energy(Futures! CEF!has!been!a!pioneer!of!community!solar!gardens!in!Minnesota!that!focuses!on!subscriber! access!for!residents!of!all!economic!backgrounds.!CEF!is!currently!completing!its!pilot!Xcel! (NSP)!community!solar!garden!project,!a!201.96kW!array!on!the!roof!of!Shiloh!Temple!in!North! Minneapolis.!This!project!is!in!engineering!review!in!Xcel!Energy’s!application!process,!and!will! be!built!in!Spring!2016.!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!is!in!active!development!of!five!other! residential!solar!gardens!ranging!in!size!from!660kW!to!1.2MW!(DC)!across!the!state,!and!is!in! evaluation!of!12!other!locations.!CEF!innovates!by!using!a!unique!cooperative!model,! prioritizing!economic!access!for!all!subscribers,!and!building!close!partnerships!with! community!organizations!like!MN!Interfaith!Power!and!Light.!These!innovations!equip!us!to! engage!a!broad!base!of!community!members!in!solar!gardens!that!save!money!for!anyone!with! an!energy!bill.!!Our!mission!is!to!build!community!wealth!by!providing!our!members!access!to! energy!efficiency!and!clean!energy!options.!!! ! Outside!of!CSG!development,!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!has!experience!with!site!assessment,! design,!customer!relations,!and!project!management!of!45!residential!solar!installations!and! three!small!commercial!installations!across!the!Twin!Cities!using!the!Made!in!Minnesota!and! Solar!Rewards!incentive!programs.!In!2015,!CEF!and!its!partners!secured!13.9%!of!the!total! statewide!Made!in!Minnesota!residential!incentives!for!our!members!and!customers.! ! Innovative(Power(Systems! With!more!than!700!systems!in!operation,!IPS!has!earned!a!reputation!for!getting!things!done.!! Over!the!past!10!years!IPS!has!emerged!as!a!leading!solar!company,!building!more!projects!in! Minnesota!than!any!other!contractor.!!In!2013!and!2014!IPS!was!recognized!as!a!Top!US!Solar! Contractor!by!Solar!Power!World!Magazine.!IPS’!success!with!utility!and!small!to!mid;scale! projects!has!been!well!documented.!!Whether!it!was!the!Solar!Advantage!Program!with!Xcel,! the!Great!River!Energy!Headquarters!building,!or!the!Xcel!Energy!High!Bridge!Plant,!IPS!can! scale!to!meet!project!demands!and!tight!deadlines.! !! 7! ! IPS!has!been!a!thought!leader!in!the!implementation!of!Community!Solar,!as!evidenced!by!its! participation!in!the!MNSEIA!working!group!and!as!a!signatory!to!the!recent!settlement! agreement!with!Xcel.!To!date!Innovative!Power!Systems!(IPS)!has!won!over!10!contracts!to! provide!subscriptions!to!public!entities!such!as!St.!Cloud!School!District,!the!City!of! Minnetonka,!Columbia!Heights!School!District,!and!more.!!IPS!and!its!partners!have!secured!site! control!for!over!2,000!acres!of!property!around!the!state!for!solar!development!and!have! submitted!over!75!applications!for!more!than!70!megawatts!to!Xcel!in!2015.! ! (ii)((Evidence(of(financial(capability(and(commitment(to(sustain(CSG(for(25/year(life.( ! As!the!long;term!operator!of!CSGs,!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!is!a!member;based!cooperative! committed!to!serving!a!growing!base!of!cooperative!members!in!an!expanding!range!of! community!energy!efficiency!and!clean!energy!opportunities.!We!have!grown!steadily!since!our! founding!in!2009,!and!have!established!several!key!assets!in!our!business!model!that!will!equip! us!to!sustain!solar!gardens!over!the!25;year!term:! ● We!are!building!our!own!online!subscriber!management!system!incorporating! subscriber!credit!and!monthly!billing!tracking,!real;time!data!analysis!and!online! reporting!for!subscribers!on!system!energy!production,!and!automated!payment! systems.!This!system!will!allow!us!to!easily!manage!transitions!of!subscribers!and! continue!to!engage!our!subscribers!over!the!long!term.! ● Our!solar!garden!financial!model!builds!in!all!the!long;term!operation!and!maintenance! costs!and!covers!them!via!ongoing!subscriber!fees!we!will!collect,!including:!! ○ Up!to!8hrs/week!of!subscriber!support/administration!for!the!life!of!the!array! ○ Operations!+!Maintenance!reserves!conservatively!calculated!at!$12/kW! installed/yr! ○ Insurance,!site!lease,!and!Xcel!Energy!administration!fees! ● As!a!cooperative!focused!on!member!service!and!member!development,!not!project! sales,!we!will!be!developing!ongoing!relationships!with!subscribers!for!future!CSGs.! This!will!allow!us!to!back;fill!unused!subscriptions!if!subscribers!move!to!ineligible! areas!or!cancel!subscriptions.! ● As!members!of!the!cooperative,!members!have!a!vested!interest!in!its!growth!and! sustained!health.!And!through!democratic!member!input,!the!cooperative!will!continue! to!serve!the!needs!and!priorities!of!members!and!their!communities.!! ! As!the!installer!of!the!solar!array,!Innovative!Power!Systems!has!an!in;house!electrical!engineer! who!can!design!and!stamp!drawings,!saving!time!and!resources!compared!to!out;sourcing.!!No! one!in!the!state!of!Minnesota!has!completed!more!solar!projects!or!gone!through!more! interconnection!processes!than!IPS.!!IPS’s!local!nature!allows!them!to!be!extremely!responsive! to!the!utility’s!needs!as!well!as!our!customers’.! !! 8! ! Similar!IPS!Projects!Completed!or!Underway!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Project(Name!System(Size(&(Description! Made!in!Minnesota!Program!800!kW,!financed!and!constructed!! Green!Line!Solar!Corridor!967!kW,!financed!and!in!construction!in!2015/2016! Louis!Industries!500!kW,!constructed!with!current!team! Eichten’s!Community!Solar!5!MW,!to!be!financed!and!constructed!in!2016! SouthWest!Community!Solar!5!MW,!to!be!financed!and!constructed!in!2016! !! Public!Sector!/!School!Customers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The!Innovative!Power!Systems!team!has!completed!installations!with!many!public!customers:! • St.!Cloud!School!District! • Chisago!Lakes!School!District! • The!City!of!Waconia! • Rockford!Public!Schools! • Annandale!Public!Schools! • Mounds!Park!Academy! • Trinity!Schools! • Becker!Public!Schools! • Holdingford!Public!Schools! ! !! 9! ! C.(Lease/Proposed(Rent.(!( ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!is!generally!agreeable!to!the!proposed!lease!agreement,!with!the! following!clarifications/!exceptions:! 1. Article!1.1(c)!States!that!Lesee!shall!not!plant!trees,!excavate,!install!improvements,!or! otherwise!undertake!activities!that!would!interfere!with!Lesee's!electrical!or! distribution!facilities.!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!is!fully!ready!to!commit!to!not! interfering!with!our!own!facilities,!but!we!assume!that!this!statement!was!intended!to! imply!that!the!Lessor!will!not!conduct!such!activities!to!interrupt!our!CSG!distribution! facilities,!and!we!see!that!statement!as!an!important!addition/clarification.! 2. Article!3.7!(a)!States!that!we!will!submit!an!application!to!NSP!prior!to!September!25,! 2015.!This!date!needs!to!be!revised!based!on!the!new!deadline.!We!would!be!ready!to! submit!an!application!to!NSP!within!1!week!of!completion!of!A.!lease!signing,!B.! approval!of!system!size!and!structural!engineering!sign;off.!From!our!experiences!with! Xcel,!having!an!accurate!system!size!rather!than!changing!it!part;way!through!the! process!will!expedite!processing!of!our!application!more!than!a!slightly!earlier! submission!date.! 3. Article!3.7!(c)!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!will!commit!to!a!minimum!production! guarantee!in!our!subscription!agreements!that!is!at!a!reduced!percentage!of!estimated! annual!production!with!measurement!of!performance!assessed!as!an!average!of!the! preceding!three!years!to!account!for!the!uncertainties!in!annual!weather.! 4. Article!9.1!We!propose!a!deadline!for!CSG!approval!by!August!1!2016! 5. Article!10.3!We!think!is!in!need!of!a!date!change! 6. Probably!trivial,!but!Exhibits!A+B!should!be!completed!before!signing! ! Proposed(rent:!We!base!our!rent!estimates!for!rooftops!at!$0.09/sq!ft/yr!with!a!3%!annual! escalator!in!rent.!For!the!Edina!Public!Works!building,!we!propose!an!82,500!sq!ft!system!with! proposed!rent!at!$7,500/yr!with!a!3%!escalator.!If!the!City!of!Edina!wishes!to!propose!an! alternative!proposal!for!rent!terms,!we!will!consider!it.! ! !! 10! ! D.(Subscription(Plan.( ! (i)(Pay/as/you/go(subscription,(production(guarantee,(and(other(subscriber(benefits(( ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!will!provide!pay;as;you;go!subscriptions!for!this!project!as! requested.!On!some!of!our!other!projects,!we!offer!both!pay;as;you;go!and!upfront!options!as!a! way!to!deliver!greater!long;run!savings!to!subscribers,!and!are!willing!to!offer!both!options!if! desired.!! ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!will!commit!to!a!minimum!production!guarantee!of!85%!of! estimated!annual!production!(listed!in!the!table!below).!Measurement!of!performance!will!be! assessed!at!the!end!of!each!full!year!of!operation!and!the!actual!production!value!of!the!most! recent!three!years!will!be!compared!to!expected!production!to!evaluate!performance!of!this! guarantee.!This!three!year!averaging!allows!us!to!account!for!the!uncertainties!in!atypical! annual!weather.! ! Other!important!features!of!our!subscriptions!include:! ● Rate!structure!that!protects!subscribers!from!rising!energy!costs.!We!have!designed!our! subscription!price!to!escalate!at!2%!a!year!for!only!the!first!eight!years!and!then!keep! the!price!flat!at!the!rate!of!that!year!(this!is!possible!because!debt!service!costs!decline! over!time).!This!allows!us!to!deliver!moderate!savings!in!the!near!term!and!major! savings!over!the!long!run.!Since!bill!credits!will!fluctuate!with!retail!energy!prices,! which!we!expect!to!rise!(historic!trend!for!the!last!15!years!is!4.6%!increase!per!year,! we!model!future!rate!increases!at!a!more!conservative!3%!per!year),!a!flat!subscription! price!in!the!long!run!will!protect!subscribers!from!rising!energy!rates.! ● We!use!a!back;up!subscriber!model!to!provide!security!for!low;credit!individuals.!In! this!model,!a!large!energy!user!agrees!to!take!over!bill!credits!and!subscription! payments!if!a!residential!subscriber!defaults!on!payments!(a!no!loss!proposition!for!the! large!energy!user!since!the!credits!are!larger!than!the!payments).!This!reduces!our!risk! of!non;payment,!allowing!us!to!offer!subscriptions!to!low;credit!subscribers!who!would! not!qualify!in!many!other!programs.!Our!sense!is!that!most!other!developers!use!a! minimum!acceptable!credit!score!of!700;!we!believe!this!standard!excludes!a! substantial!portion!of!those!who!would!most!benefit!from!the!energy!price!stability!that! CSGs!can!provide.! ● Cooperative!Energy!Futures!subscription!agreements!allow!subscribers!to!retain!their! subscription!without!charge!if!they!move!to!another!eligible!address,!and!have!minimal! fees!for!subscribers!to!terminate!or!transfer!their!subscriptions!for!other!reasons.! ! ! !! 12! ! (iii)((Plan(for(attracting(Edina(residential(subscribers.( ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!uses!a!multi;tiered!outreach!strategy!for!subscriber!engagement! with!a!focus!on!residential!subscribers!across!all!our!solar!gardens.!Across!all!of!our!subscriber! engagement!efforts,!we!will!focus!on!core!messaging!elements!of:! ● Locking!in!long;term!affordable!electrical!costs!to!help!lower!one’s!overall!housing! costs.!!This!aligns!well!with!Edina’s!desire!to!provide!more!affordable!life;cycle!housing! options,!especially!for!young!adults!who!grew!up!in!and!still!have!family!in!Edina!to! choose!to!live!there!at!a!time!when!their!careers!and!incomes!are!still!developing.! ● Neighbors!joining!together!to!create!local!energy!independence!and!keep!our!energy! dollars!local! ● Leading!the!way!towards!clean!energy!together! ! For!the!Edina!CSG,!we!will!work!with!CEF!associated!Edina!residents!who!will!help!us!to! market!the!array!through!their!networks!and!will!partner!with!Minnesota!Interfaith!Power!&! Light!to!do!outreach!in!faith!communities.!!In!particular:! ! ● CEF!will!reach!out!to!active!Edina!neighborhood!organizations!to!identify!their!interest! in!partnering!to!promote!subscriptions!to!neighborhood!residents!by!co;hosting!an! informational!meeting!in!their!neighborhood!and!promoting!the!opportunity!to! subscribe!via!any!existing!electronic!or!print!communications!they!use.!CEF!has!already! identified!interest!in!hosting!informational!meetings!and!promoting!to!neighborhood! residents!if!selected!for!this!project!from!the!Strachauer!Park!Neighborhood!Association! and!is!in!discussion!with!other!area!neighborhood!associations.!We!will!expand!the! scope!of!neighborhoods!engaged!if!selected!for!this!project.!! ● Minnesota!Interfaith!Power!&!Light!(MNIPL)!will!work!with!CEF!as!a!marketing!partner! on!this!array.!!MNIPL’s!mission!is!to!foster!earth!care!and!enironmental!justice!in! hundreds!of!Minnesota!faith!communities.!MNIPL!has!been!working!with!an!active!team! of!staff!and!volunteers!for!over!a!year!to!do!education!and!outreach!on!community!solar! to!their!congregational!base.!They!have!worked!with!CEF!on!an!array!in!North! Minneapolis,!and!have!created!a!video!encouraging!faith!communities!to!invest!in! renewable!energy!that!will!be!accessible!to!all!and!help!close!the!employment!gap! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG4Lo1ycDiQ).!They!have!reached!out!to!5!faith! communities!in!Edina!(including!sustaining!member!Edina!Community!Lutheran! Church,!Colonial!Church,!Good!Samaritan!United!Methodist,!St.!Stevens!Episcopal,!and! St.!Patrick’s!Catholic!Church)!who!have!expressed!interest!in!learning!more!about!how! to!get!involved!in!making!community!solar!available!to!their!congregational!members.!! If!we!are!awarded!this!contract,!MNIPL!will!also!convene!a!group!of!Edina!faith! communities!to!explore!connecting!existing!affordable!housing!projects!with!this!solar! !! 13! ! array!providing!yet!another!pool!of!potential!subscribers!while!also!benefitting!low; income!Edina!residents.!! ● CEF!will!engage!condo!and!townhome!associations!in!which!residents!pay!their!own! electricity!bills!to!set!up!similar!informational!meetings!and!resident;led!outreach.! From!conversations!with!Edina!residents!in!our!network,!we!have!identified!a!number! of!residents!of!the!York!Plaza!and!Cedars!of!Edina!associations!supportive!of!solar! energy,!and!will!engage!these!residents!and!residents!of!other!associations!to!host! informational!meetings!and!recruit!subscribers!from!their!community.!! ● Additionally,!CEF!will!seek!to!place!articles/posts!about!the!Edina!community!solar! garden!on!relevant!local!news!sources!and!list;serves,!particularly!by!notifying!the! Edina!Sun!Current,!having!residents!of!Edina!use!Nextdoor!Edina!to!notify!their! neighbors,!and!engaging!leaders!in!Edina!Go!Green!to!promote!the!opportunity.!CEF! would!appreciate!the!opportunity!to!include!a!notification!about!the!project!in!the! appropriate!quarterly!edition!of!About!Town,!if!the!City!of!Edina!deems!it!appropriate.! ● Assuming!that!the!City!of!Edina!continues!hosting!an!Annual!Environmental!Forum!in! April,!we!would!appreciate!the!opportunity!to!table!and/or!present!opportunities!to! engage!in!the!project!at!that!Forum!if!subscriptions!are!still!available.!If!subscriptions! are!still!vacant!by!June,!we!would!begin!tabling!at!the!Edina!Farmers!Market.! ! In!accordance!with!the!terms!of!the!lease,!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!will!commence! subscription!outreach!activities!in!December!2015,!assuming!that!proposer!selection!is! conducted!on!the!projected!timeline.!During!December,!we!will!focus!on!developing! relationships!with!the!types!of!partners!identified!above!and!scheduling!public!informational! meetings!and!written!and!social!media!for!January;April!2016,!when!the!majority!of!our!direct! subscriber!engagement!will!occur.!While!we!do!not!anticipate!challenges!filling!subscriptions! from!residential!subscribers!through!April,!we!will!expand!our!outreach!efforts!into!tabling!at! Farmers!Markets!if!needed!and!by!direct!outreach!to!Edina!commercial!subscribers!in!June; August!2016!if!the!project!has!not!been!filled!in!the!6;month!recruitment!window.!If!needed,! we!would!then!tap!our!existing!pool!of!eligible!subscribers!we!have!outside!of!Edina.! ! (iv)((Handling(of(subscriber(management,(administration(and(changes.( ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!will!manage!its!own!subscriber!management,!administration,!and! changes!over!the!25!years!using!our!subscriber!administration!portal!and!interfacing!with! Xcel’s!Energy!subscriber!management!system.!CEF!will!be!conducting!ongoing!outreach!to! subscribers!for!other!CSGs,!generating!an!ongoing!waiting!list!of!potential!subscribers,!and!will! be!able!to!pull!in!new!members!to!fill!any!subscription!transfers!not!identified!by!the! transferring!subscriber.!The!ongoing!administration!cost!of!managing!subscriptions!is!built! into!our!financial!model!and!operations!plan.! !! 14! ! E.((Operation(and(Maintenance(Plan.(!! ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!includes!$0.012/W!installed/yr!in!Operations!and!Maintenance! costs!in!our!project!development!model,!a!conservative!industry!standard.!This!amounts!to! $7,500!in!annual!reserves!for!O&M,!which!will!be!held!in!an!ESCROW!account!year!over!year!as! timing!of!equipment!repair!and!replacement!expenses!is!unpredictable.!The!primary!expected! expense!will!be!inverter!replacements!with!an!expected!timeframe!of!15;20!years.!!Inverters! typically!represent!less!than!10%!of!the!total!upfront!system!cost!with!a!10;12!year!warranty.!!! ! IPS!will!provide!an!annual!site!visit!and!tiered!action!plan!as!part!of!its!Operations!and! Maintenance!agreement.!!The!action!plan!will!have!elevating!responses!based!on!the!severity!of! a!system!issue.!!For!example,!a!critical!issue!that!affects!more!than!50%!of!production!must!be! attended!to!within!48!hours.!CEF!will!monitor!solar!array!production!remotely!via!its!installed! internet;connected!monitoring!system!to!verify!system!performance!and!identify!issues!in! need!of!maintenance.! ! !! 15! ! F.((Financing(Plan( ! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!is!finalizing!negotiations!with!a!tax!equity!partner!to!finance!a! portfolio!of!projects!in!2016!that!would!include!the!Edina!Public!Works!Building!solar!garden.! In!these!negotiations,!we!have!used!a!model!in!which!the!tax!equity!investor!will!hold!majority! ownership!for!the!first!6!years,!after!which!point!ownership!will!flip!to!majority!(or!potentially! solely)!ownership!by!CEF.!The!tax!equity!partner!will!finance!approximately!40%!of!the!total! cost!of!the!array,!the!remainder!of!which!will!be!financed!by!15;year!debt.!CEF!is!exploring!an! option!to!use!crowd;financed!preferred!equity!from!cooperative!members!through!an! emerging!crowd;finance!platform!as!an!alternative!to!part!or!all!of!this!debt!(this!would!use!the! recent!MNvest!regulations!or!similar!cooperative!exemptions).! ! CEF!uses!a!back;up!subscriber!model!to!mitigate!risks!of!default!as!an!alternative!to!individual! credit!checks.!A!back;up!subscriber!agrees!to!take!over!bill!credits!and!subscription!payments! for!residential!subscribers!that!default!at!a!lower!General!Service!subscription!payment!rate! that!will!still!save!the!back;up!subscriber!money!on!their!bills.!This!ensures!that!we!will!have!a! subscriber!immediately!available!to!fill!any!vacancies!due!to!default,!which!consists!of!two! months!of!unpaid!subscription!payments,!and!then!back;fill!the!array!with!a!new!residential! subscriber!as!soon!as!one!becomes!available.!We!have!modeled!a!5%!average!vacancy!rate!for!a! fully!residential!solar!garden!into!our!financial!model,!and!having!a!back;up!subscriber,! combined!with!our!ongoing!residential!subscriber!recruitment!efforts!for!other!CSGs,!will! minimize!disruption!to!our!subscriber!base.!In!negotiations!with!tax!equity!partners,!we!have! confirmed!that!this!model!will!allow!us!to!avoid!the!need!for!credit!checks.!! ! We!invite!the!City!of!Edina!to!consider!playing!the!role!of!back;up!subscriber!for!this!solar! garden,!which!again!would!only!mean!taking!over!bill!credits!and!subscription!payments! smaller!than!those!credits!during!instances!of!subscriber!default,!as!a!way!to!create!access!for! Edina!residents!of!all!credit!statuses.!We!see!this!as!a!valuable!opportunity!for!the!City!of!Edina! to!provide!access!to!low!long;term!electric!rates!to!create!more!affordable!and!stable!costs!of! living!for!Edina!young!people!and!low!income!families!who!may!not!otherwise!have!the!credit! access!to!participate.!If!the!City!of!Edina!does!not!wish!to!play!this!role,!CEF!will!work!to!secure! a!back;up!subscriber!from!another!source,!although!this!is!sometimes!difficult!without!also! offering!such!a!large!business!or!institutional!customer!some!amount!of!subscription!on!an! ongoing!basis!(which!would!violate!the!goal!of!a!residential;only!array).!We!are!open!to! discussing!options!with!the!City!of!Edina!for!back;up!subscriber!roles!and!other!strategies!to! ensure!access!for!low;credit!Edina!families.! ! !! 16! ! G.((Schedule.!!( ! Our!expected!schedule!for!project!development!is:! ● Final!design!and!structural!engineering!review:!mid!October;mid!November! (contingent!on!selection!by!10/20)! ● Initial!application!to!Xcel!(contingent!on!timely!processing!by!Xcel):!mid!November;mid! December! ● Subscriber!recruitment!partnership!formation:!December!2015!+!January!2016! ● Xcel!Engineering!review!and!application!approval:!January;April!2016!;!Xcel!Energy!is! required!by!state!law!to!review!all!completed!applications!within!3!months!or!them! being!deemed!complete.!However,!Xcel!has!not!met!this!time!frame!over!the!past!9! months,!so!this!time!frame!could!extend!into!the!summer.! ● Subscriber!recruitment:!January;May!(or!longer!if!required)!2016.! ● Procurement!and!finalizing!installation!schedule!(May;July)!;!dependent!on!Xcel!Energy! approval! ● Construction!(August;September!2016).!Starting!date!will!depend!on!delivery!date!from! time!of!order!placement!of!equipment!manufacturer! ● Commissioning!(September/October!2016).! ! CEF!and!IPS!will!provide!updated!and!more!detailed!construction!timelines!as!initial! milestones!are!passed! ! !! 17! ! H.((Other(Benefits(to(City( ! In!addition!to!the!member!benefits!and!subscription!terms!defined!in!D.!Subscription!Plan,! Cooperative!Energy!Futures!will!deliver!the!following!benefits!to!the!City!and!its!residents:! ● Transparent(operations.!CEF!will!provide!real;time!public!access!to!aggregated!data! (not!subscriber!specific)!on!total!production,!total!credits,!and!number!of!subscribers! for!the!whole!array.!Production!for!the!whole!system!will!be!displayed!real;time!on!a! publicly!accessible!portion!of!our!subscriber!portal,!which!will!also!update!the!total! credits!delivered!on!a!monthly!basis.!As!a!transparent,!member;controlled!organization,! CEF!will!also!provide!annual!reports!on!revenues,!expenses,!and!usage!of!member! patronage!to!all!subscribers!in!the!Edina!CSG!on!an!annual!basis.!If!desired,!CEF!will! provide!this!reporting!to!the!City!of!Edina!as!well!as!a!service!to!the!City!as!the!host!of! the!project.!All!data!reporting!and!public!displays!will!be!aggregated!anonymous!data!to! protect!subscriber!privacy.! ● Workforce(Development(and(training.!CEF!has!partnered!with!Renewable!Energy! Partners!to!provide!job!training!and!job!placements!as!installation!crews!of!our! Engineering!Procurement!and!Construction!(EPC)!contractors,!and!has!written! requirements!for!minority!hiring!into!our!EPC!contracts.!We!would!be!eager!to!partner! with!local!organizations!in!Edina!to!source!participants!in!this!job!training!program!if! desired!and!such!local!partner!organizations!are!identified.! ● Subscribers(own(and(control(project(wealth.!Subscribers!become!members!of!the! cooperative!that!owns!and!manages!the!system,!though!they!do!not!own!the!panels! directly.!As!a!member;based!co;op,!Cooperative!Energy!Futures!distributes!excess! profits!beyond!that!needed!for!ongoing!operations!and!business!stability!to!its!members! through!equity!distributions,!annual!patronage!checks,!or!increased!member!services! (for!example,!discounts!on!other!energy!saving!services).!As!a!democratic!organization,! subscribers!vote!for!and!can!run!for!the!Board!that!manages!the!timeframe!and!form!of! these!distributions!to!all!members.!For!CSGs,!we!anticipate!substantial!member!equity! and!distributions!in!the!latter!years!of!operation!(especially!years!15;25),!after!debt! service!has!been!completed.!This!cooperative!mechanism!ensures!greater!subscriber! benefit!above!and!beyond!discounted!subscription!prices,!because!CEF!redistributes! and!does!not!pocket!surplus!generated!by!the!project!based!on!the!goals!and!interests! of!our!members.! Public Works BuildingOCTOBER, 3 2015 1413 Hunting Valley Road St. Paul, MN 55108 Public Works Building INNOVATIVE POWER SYSTEMS C O N C E P T D R A W I N G Public Works BuildingOCTOBER, 3 2015 133' 6"320' 1" 2 8 0 ' 6 " 1 2 2 ' 4 " 2 8 1 ' 5 " 1 9 0 ' 7 " 113' 0"134' 6"150' 8"13' 10" 2 5 8 ' 2 " 26' 11" 01 DIMENSIONS Public Works BuildingOCTOBER, 3 2015 N Underground line Public Works Building PV Array Layout 7450 Metro Boulevard MN 55439 Innovative Power Systems 1413 Hunting Valley Road St. Paul, MN 55108 Disconnect Bi-directional meterProduction meter 1'1' Transformer T M e t r o B l v d 945 modules 1061 modules 221 modules 107 modules PV System: 2334 PEIMAR 270-watt PV modules Total Output: 630.18 kilowatts 02 PLAN Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2015-113: Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2015-113 Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2015-113 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Fire Department: Cecelia Dolan $100.00 Thanks for service Munci Family $20.00 Thanks for service Edina Police Department: Dilorenzo Family $75.00 Thanks for tour Dated: December 1, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 1, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Heather Branigin, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action is necessary. INTRODUCTION: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondence One 12.01.15 Correspondence Two 12.01.15 Heather Branigin From: Jennifer Janovy <jjanovy@outlook.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 9:06 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Please forward to the City Council Dear Council Members, Thank you for taking a few minutes to discuss the Morningside A project at your November 18 meeting. The discussion indicated that there are some misunderstandings about both the project and the process. I will try to outline these briefly; feel free to contact me with any questions. 1. Director Millner stated that the proposed traffic calming recommendations are based on the NE Edina Transportation Study (2006), which included getting input from the wider area. That is true, but what is also true is that those recommendations created a division in the Country Club neighborhood that delayed the project and contributed to the project racking up over $2 million in engineering fees. Ultimately, the recommendations were rejected and the Council adopted a compromise plan instead. The Council motion is included below. Let's think seriously before going forward with recommendations based on that study process. 2. Director Millner gave the usual warning—if the schedule is not kept, then they could lose four to six weeks, which could delay opening bids, which could lead to higher costs. It could play out that way, but as my mom often said, "Anything worth doing, is worth doing right." That requires taking the time that is needed and involving the people who have a stake. The preference to keep to the schedule should not outweigh the responsibility to take the time that is needed to get this project right. 3. It was stated that the ETC had approved the project. The ETC did not approve the project, but did review it and offered comments. Director Millner stated that most of the group was favorable toward the project. This is a mischaracterization, unless one assumes that silence means support. The expressed feedback was mixed, and a majority of ETC members did not engage in the discussion. The feasibility study appendix includes emails from several residents in the project area in opposition to project elements and asking for consideration of alternatives. These emails pre-dated the ETC meeting but were not shared with the ETC. Had they been, we could have had a more informed discussion and raised questions on their behalf. 4. Member Swenson asked why the City would change its policy and notify a larger area. Notifying a larger area would not be a change in policy. Morningside has a recognized neighborhood association. It is already City policy to notify and consult with the neighborhood on matters of neighborhood interest, such as road reconstruction projects. It is therefore consistent with City policy to provide wider notification. 5. Member Swenson stated that this project is no different from any other. That is a complete misunderstanding. The feasibility study proposes to narrow each leg of the intersection at Sunnyside and Grimes to 20-feet. Grimes at W. 45th would also be narrowed to 20-feet, as would each leg of the intersection at Sunnyside and Curve. For comparison, that is about the width of the entrance road to the Weber Park parking lot. In my seven years on the ETC this is the most extreme proposal to narrow intersections that I have seen—except for the Country Club recommendations that were ultimately rejected. Director Millner has stated that one intent of the recommendations is to dissuade motorists from using Sunnyside and encourage them to use W. 44th instead. This is a proposal to divert traffic- 1 again, not something I have seen since the Country Club recommendations that were rejected by the Council in 2008. It is critical that you understand how the recommendations for this project are different than what the city has been doing. Director Millner has stated that they do not know what the traffic impacts of the proposed measures will be. 6. Referring to the W. 44th project, Director Millner stated that the curb extensions at Kojetin Park are very similar to what is being proposed for the Morningside project. There are two huge differences. First, the curb extensions at Kojetin Park are mid block, not at an intersection. There are no turning movements to consider. Second, while I don't have an exact measurement, the road appears to be no narrower than 25 or so feet at that point. This is materially wider than the 20-feet proposed for Sunnyside, Curve and Grimes. The above is intended as clarification and not as criticism. At this point, you probably have not had the opportunity tor read the feasibility study and so I have no expectation that you're familiar with the details of the project. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me with an comments or questions. Jennifer Janovy City Council motion on Country Club compromise plan, April 21, 2008: Member Housh moved that the Council accept the compromise plan presented by the Country Club representatives provided that i.) sidewalks be installed across existing islands as recommended by the Northeast Edina Traffic Study, ii.) the final location of crosswalks be determined by the City Engineer based upon the conceptual locations shown in the compromise plan, and iii.) the proposed reduction in speed limits to 25 mph be deferred to a later date. Further, i.) all recommended vertical and horizontal realignments of streets in the northeast Edina study area outside of the Country Club district be deleted as planned improvements provided that ii.) pedestrian-related improvements in this area be pursued at the appropriate time. Further, pedestrian-related improvements for the Morningside area be undertaken per the recommendations of the Morningside Neighborhood Association with the understanding that the stop signs proposed for the Grimes and Sunnyside intersection will be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee for review and recommendation (emphasis added). Ayes: Bennett Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 2 October 22, 2015 Mr. James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St, Edina Minnesota 55410 Dear Mr. Hovland, I am reaching out to you, the mayor of Edina, about a survey that was recently taken concerning your . In this survey, more than 500 Edina residents took part in rating the city of Edina, with 96 percent of them rating it as a "good" or "excellent" place to live, and not a single person claiming it to be a "poor" living area. This is very impressive in my opinion; however, more than half of those surveyed also believe that the cost of living in the city is too expensive. I am telling you this, because the filets and statistics throughout my reading has brought up some interesting points that I would like to share with you. After reading through the survey the citizens of Edina took part in, I believe that Edina should consider lowering their prices. Considering that this same survey has been taken year after year, and it is known that each year the numbers of the citizens for lowering the prices has increased, I can't help but wonder why nothing has been changed. It's come to my attention that in the past year many old homes have been torn down to bring in new, improved, and more expensive homes. Instead of investing in the destruction of all of these homes and building new ones, perhaps remodeling these homes and making them available for a cheaper cost will help the citizens feel secure and allow them to afford living in this friendly environment. On the other hand, there is a question this survey suggests: 'Does this make other cities; unlivable?" (Edina, MN). Edina is a part of a chain of more expensive cities to live in across Minnesota. Does this make other cities, such as; Rogers, Maple Grove, St. Michael-Albertville, Blaine, and many other less expensive towns not worth it? Growing up in St. Michael-Albertville my whole life provided me and my family with a wonderful lifestyle. I believe that we received the same satisfactions that the citizens of Edina have been given, but for half the cost In comparison to Edina, Albertville, for example, has a great school system, offers many leisurely activities to participate in around the community, and also consists of the Albertville Outlet Mall and many dining choices, while also keeping the prices of living down to a reasonable price. In my opinion, the fact that the prices are lower in other suburb areas doesn't make them less livable. I consider both towns to be great and the perfect places for anyone to live, but you don't want to lose citizens who love your city because of the expensive prices. Everyone deserves to live comfortably and somewhere that they feel at home, and if that place just happens to be Edina, we want to make sure that they can afford it. Many people that live in Edina, are a part of the wealthier end of people in Minnesota and have no problem with paying the cost that it takes to live in Edina. Some may argue that the prices of housing and living in Edina should be increased; due to the quality of the lifestyle Edina has to offer. Edina is very well known for being one of the wealthiest suburbs in Minnesota, resulting in many doctors, lawyers, and athletes living there. Some people may argue that Edina has the right to keep their prices high considering the great school district, country clubs, churches, and many other attractions that they have to offer. Edina public schools not only excel in academics, but "have also received the most athletic titles in the nation" (Edina). Along with the public schools, many private schools are a very popular option for people to send their children to. When private schools can be afforded, parents believe that their children will receive a better education and become more well developed, making it a common option for the wealthier families to do. Edina is home to four important churches along with a few smaller ones, and two country clubs. Edina's country clubs are known for their amazing golf courses, which are considered "some of the finest in the nation" (Edina). These clubs have hosted all kinds ofnational championships throughout the years in men and women's golf There are two sides of Edina: the east and the west side. The west side consists of expensive living, while the east side is home to amazing shopping centers and the very expensive Galleria. Edina has so much to offer its citizens and has a wealthy lifestyle layout, which is why the prices are believed to be high and should be kept that way. There are benefits that have been argued about for many years about whether it's best to lower prices or if it's best to keep them where they are at. I strongly believe that the prices should be lowered to offer everyone the chance to live in an environment that makes them feel welcomed and safe. Of course, many will disagree with my belief that Edina should lower their living expenses for the better of the citizens; on the grounds that it provides more money to other people in the making of the city. However, I ask that you please take these ideas into consideration and have another survey completed again two years from now and see if any answers have changed. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Kennedy Molitor Bibliography 'Edina." Urban Dictionary. Web. 20 Oct 2015. "Edina, MN ."Best Places to Live. Web. 5 Oct. 2015. "Edina., MN - Lifestyle and Demographics - Realtor.com."Realtor.com. Web. 5 Oct. 2015. 'These Are The 10 Best Minneapolis Suburbs To Live In."Movoto.com. 8 June 2015. Web. 5 Oct. 2015. "21 Safest Cities in Minnesota: Safe Places to Live in MN - Page 2 of 2 - Safe Choice Security News." Safe Choice Security News. 21 Aug. 2014. Web. 5 Oct. 2015. Heather Branigin From: Brad Roseberry <broseberry@cabt.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 2:23 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: We Won Round 2 of 3 Dear Ann, The Senate voted this afternoon to approve Sens. Wicker and Feinstein's amendment to strike the mandatory double 33s provision from the THUD appropriations bill. This is a yet another victory for highway safety and sound transportation policies, and we could not do it without your help. We have had three huge victories in three weeks, and your hundreds of calls, emails and visits to Washington, D.C., were critical to these wins. We also want to thank Sens. Wicker and Feinstein for their leadership and courage in standing up for highway safety. Please join me in applauding their incredible efforts to gain support from Senate colleagues in the face of intense pressure. While momentum is on our side, one final hurdle remains. The Senate and House members will meet in conference to hash out the differences in their respective bills. This will be done as part of the broader omnibus spending bill. We will need to make sure conferees maintain the Senate's position, since the double 33s provision is still in the House version of the THUD bill. Your efforts have been vital to these wins. Let's keep up this winning streak and defeat double 33s like we did 91,000-pound trucks just a few weeks ago. I'll likely be back in touch with you to discuss next steps, but for now enjoy another victory for highway safety. Brad Brad Roseberry Assistant Vice President Coalition Against Bigger Trucks Don't forget to follow us on Facebook and Twitter Click here to unsubscribe. 1 Heather Branigin From: Andrea Piepho <andreapiepho@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 8:44 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: SWLRT Project Dear Mayor Jim Hovland: As an Edina resident, I am writing to ask that you protect the Kenilworth Greenway from co-location of freight rail and LRT. The Kenilworth Greenway is a regional trail used by nearly one million users, including myself, commuting from Edina to downtown Minneapolis on my bike. I understand that the SWLRT project is important for the city of Edina and surrounding areas but please don't allow it to be built at the expense of a regional treasure that once gone is lost forever. Please consider a re-examination of the alignment that allows Edina residents the opportunities of LRT but not the destruction of regional resources. I am also concerned with increased freight traffic on the rail going through Edina as a result of bridge improvements that would occur as a result of the SWLRT. Sincerely, Andrea Piepho 5040 Edinbrook Lane, Edina andreapiephogmail.com 1 Heather Branigin From: David Arbit <davida@mplsrealtor.com> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:51 AM To: James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com; Edina Mail Subject: November 2015 MAAR Market Update Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council: Housing—the very sector that led us into the Great Recession—now seems to be leading the way toward recovery. Sales and prices are reaching multi-year highs both in the Minneapolis-St. Paul region and across the nation. Fewer homeowners are underwater, remodeling and renovation is strong and housing investment is once again creating a multiplier effect that reverberates throughout the economy and creates jobs in a variety of fields. Here is what's happening in your local market. Please note that these figures have been updated more recently than those used in the report. • New Listings in Edina increased 5.2 percent to 122. • Pending Sales were up 7.0 percent to 76. • Closed Sales increased 22.9 percent to 86. • Days on Market was up 14.9 percent to 85 days. • The Median Sales Price decreased 5.0 percent to $349,500. • Inventory levels shrank 7.2 percent to 361 homes. • Percent of List Price Received at Sale remained flat at 96.5 percent. • Months Supply of Inventory was down 12.2 percent to 4.3 months. • Distressed sales made up 3.5 percent of all Closed Sales. • Single-Family homes made up 63.1 percent of all Closed Sales. • New construction properties made up 2.3 percent of all Closed Sales. The October jobs report was truly impressive—beating even the most optimistic expectations. Private job growth is accelerating, wage growth is picking up, unemployment is at multi-year lows and inflation remains tame. Now perhaps more than ever, the Federal Reserve is poised to make their first effort at normalizing rates. At their December meeting, many observers expect a modest increase in the Federal Funds Rate, which will trickle over into consumer-facing interest rates. Most forecasts call for 30-year mortgage rates to reach around 4.5 percent by the end of 2016, only half a percentage point higher than present day. The normalization process is expected to be slow, steady and incremental and shouldn't have a major impact on housing demand. Your local report lives here: http://maarstats.10kresearch.com/does/Imu/x/edina. The Twin Cities Metro report can be found here: http://maarstats.10kresearch.com/docs/Imu/x/TwinCitiesRegion. If you have any comments or questions, please don't hesitate to contact us. Also, be sure to check out all of the market reports on our website - http://www.mplsrealtorcom. Thank you! David Arbit, MCRP Director of Research & Economics Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS® 5750 Lincoln Drive - Edina, MN 55436 USA P: 952-988-3150 I F: 952-908-2646 MAAR I Market Reports I Bloq Heather Branigin From: Lee McGrath <Imcgrath@ilorg> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 2:40 PM To: James Hovland Cc: Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Bonnie Speer McGrath (bsmcgrath@mac.com); Michael McGrath (mjmcgrath12@gmail.com); jenya_mcgrath@yahoo.com Subject: City of San Antonio repeals its anticompetitive food truck regulation Dear Mayor Hovland: You and the other members of Edina's City Council members may enjoy reading below about the City of San Antonio's decision to promote opportunity and fairness. My law firm, the Institute for Justice, represented the entrepreneurs/plaintiffs in the case. Thank you. Very truly yours, Lee McGrath 4619 Moorland Avenue Edina MN 55424 • h FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 19, 2015 CONTACT: Shira Rawlinson, (703) 682-9320 ext. 229 Victory for San Antonio Food Trucks New Ordinance Repeals 300-Foot Ban against Food Trucks San Antonio—Today, the San Antonio City Council repealed a decades-old law that prohibits food trucks from operating within 300 feet of any restaurant, grocer or convenience store. The change comes in response to a lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice (U) last month on behalf of four San Antonio food truck owners. "San Antonio's 300-foot ban against food trucks was unconstitutional and its repeal marks an important victory for our clients and the economic liberty of every entrepreneur in this city," said IJ attorney Arif Panju, lead counsel in Lopez v. San Antonio. "Hopefully, San Antonio is beginning to recognize that the government cannot use its power to pick winners and losers in the marketplace. IJ will keep a close watch on San Antonio and will be back if the city decides to reinstate these unconstitutional restrictions in the future." WATCH A SHORT VIDEO ABOUT THE CASE On October 6th, a group of San Antonio food truck owners teamed up with the Institute for Justice to challenge the city's 300-foot ban in court as a clear violation of Texans' right to economic liberty—the right to earn an honest living. IJ represents Rafael Lopez who operates the El Bandera Jalisco food truck; father and son Regino and Bernardo Soriano and their El Bandolero food trucks; and Ricardo Quintanilla, who operates the Tacos el Regio food truck. 1 "The repeal of the 300-foot ban is long overdue, and I am glad that our lawsuit forced the city to do the right thing," said Ricardo Quintanilla. "I am happy that I can now focus on running my business instead of worrying about getting shut down if a restaurant opens nearby." This June, in a landmark ruling in another case brought by IJ, the Texas Supreme Court decided Patel v. Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation. That decision made clear that the Texas Constitution provides greater protection to economic liberty than the U.S. Constitution, and that review of economic regulation must be meaningful, robust protection for economic liberty. "Today's repeal means that San Antonio recognizes that entrepreneurs should not need their competitors' permission to operate a business," said Matt Miller, Managing Attorney of IP s Texas Office. "This is a big win, not just for food-truck entrepreneurs in San Antonio, but for street vendors throughout Texas and the rest of the country who face similar unconstitutional restrictions on their right to earn an honest living. Today's victory shows that when street vendors take a stand and fight for that right, they can—and should—prevail," said Bert Gall, an IJ senior attorney who directs IF s National Street Vending Initiative. The Institute for Justice is the nation's leading legal advocate for the rights of entrepreneurs. For more on Ws lawsuit against San Antonio, click here. ## 2 Heather Branigin From: james.castle@earthlink.net Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 4:08 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Jim Castle Organization: Website: Address_1: 5224 Duncraig Rd Address_2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55436 Email: james.castle@earthlink.net Phone: 952-920-09277 Referrer: other Message: To whom it may concern, I would like to file a complaint regarding Edina's recycling service, it is completely inadequate. Because of the every other week pick up I have now missed six weeks due to travel. I have bags of recycling piling up in my garage. Over a year ago I wrote to Solvei Wilmot. I was told there was a six year contract awarded to the recycling service for the every other week service. To be blunt, this is a joke. I am sure Edina must have saved a tidy sum of money to lock into a six year contract, and the irony that this was also done to reduce the cities carbon footprint does go not go wasted. Edina has tied the residents hands from making the necessary changes. We are pushed daily by government and climate change groups to recycle more and more every day. Yet our city only picks up recycling every other week. My trash can sits empty and my recycle bin overfloweth. Yes, this is great, less waste in landfills, less raw material consumption, but the City of Edina is inadequate in providing residents with a reliable recycling waste program. Recycling should be picked up every week. We should not be locked into a six year contract that prevents necessary changes for residents. Ms. Wilmot suggested I order a second recycling bin. I would then have, a trash bin, two recycling bins and a yard waste bin. That is excessive. I would not be able to exit my driveway in the morning. This program is broken, please fix it. Please return this program to weekly pickup. Jim Castle 1 Heather Branigin From: James Castle <james.castle@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 8:35 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Recycling To whom it may concern, I would like to file a complaint regarding Edina's recycling service, it is completely inadequate. Because of the every other week pick up I have now missed six weeks due to travel. I have bags of recycling piling up in my garage. Over a year ago I wrote to Solvei Wilmot. I was told there was a six year contract awarded to the recycling service for the every other week service. To be blunt, this is a joke. I am sure Edina must have saved a tidy sum of money to lock into a six year contract, and the irony that this was also done to reduce the cities carbon footprint does go not go wasted. Edina has tied the residents hands from making the necessary changes. We are pushed daily by government and climate change groups to recycle more and more every day. Yet our city only picks up recycling every other week. My trash can sits empty and my recycle bin overfloweth. Yes, this is great, less waste in landfills, less raw material consumption, but the City of Edina is inadequate in providing residents with a reliable recycling waste program. Recycling should be picked up every week. We should not be locked into a six year contract that prevents necessary changes for residents. Ms. Wilmot suggested I order a second recycling bin. I would then have, a trash bin, two recycling bins and a yard waste bin. That is excessive. I would not be able to exit my driveway in the morning. This program is broken, please fix it. Please return this program to weekly pickup. Jim Castle Begin forwarded message: From: Solvei Wilmot <swilmotAEdinaMN.gov> Date: July 29, 2014 at 11:54:02 AM CDT To: "James Castle" <jimAphotocastle.conn> Subject: RE: recycling Mr. Castle, I am sorry to hear about the challenges you are having with Republic for recycling service. I most certainly will alert them to your need for a recycling cart. In regard to the long hold times, Republic did inform me of a recent expansion to their service area. As a result, the customer service center area has been expanded and they are working to increase staff to meet the call demands. This information does not resolve the current frustration with the long wait times, but a resolution is expected in the near future. In regard to the every other week collection: during the last contract process, the City Council, in response to the Energy and Environment Commission's request, placed a value on environmental benefits in addition to best cost. As a result, the contractors that offered every other week collection received a higher value because their collection resulted in less carbon monoxide/ carbon footprint in the City. Therefore, the Council approved the contract with the best environmental benefits and the lowest cost. This means the city will not be moving to weekly collection process in the near future. 1 Thank you for your interest in recycling and desire to keep recycling. An order for the cart has been forward to Republic. Sincerely, Solvei Wilmot, Environmental Health Specialist I/Recycling Coordinator 952-826-0463 Fax 952-826-0390 swilmotP,EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.qov Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and ,q1q9, From: James Castle [mailto:jim(aphotocastle.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:52 AM To: Solvei Wilmot Cc: Cindy Castle Subject: recycling Hi Solvei, We moved from 7300 Wooddale Ave to 5224 Duncraig Rd last week. We established garbage and recycling at our new home yet the recycling company removed the container. We have have not had a container for the past week and have recycling piling up. We have not been able to reach Republic Services, we are constantly put on extended holds of 15 minutes or more. This is not acceptable. All in all I am not satisfied with the Edina recycling program, every other week does not work and the vendor is not responsive to residents communication. Please advise us on how to get a container today or I will just take the one from my old house. Also please fix this inadequate recycling program. Jim Castle Jim Castle 5224 Duncraig Rd. Edina, MN 55436 952-920-9277 Home 612-269-1719 Cell jim@photocastle.com 2 Heather Branigin From: Michael Hughey <michael.hughey@gmail.com > Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2015 7:51 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering - Golf Terrace B Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Categories: Red Category Hello, I have a very specific concern about the Golf Terrace B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project, and kindly request that you respond to my inquiry with an explanation. I am the owner and resident at 5612 Concord Ave, a property impacted by the project. I have no comments or concerns with the project in general, and I appreciate the thoughtful approach taken by the City Council and Engineering Department to plan the project and solicit community input. However, I am concerned that the front section of my property - which does not currently have a curb - does not have sufficient elevation drop to allow for installation of a curb between my property and the existing roadway surface. I believe the only feasible way for a curb to be installed is for the future roadway to be lowered by several inches relative to its current elevation. I assume that this approach of lowering the roadway is very straightforward and is the approach that is being planned. But could you please confirm this for me? If another approach is being planned, I would like to understand it. Kind regards, Michael Hughey 1 Heather Branigin From: ari@robincapital.com Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2015 4:16 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Export To Malaysia Dear Mayor, We are an investment holding company based in Malaysia, currently looking to establish a retail network specializing in distributing 100% American-made consumer products. By 100%, we mean every single element of the product, from raw material, processing to manufacturing are all sourced and/or originated in the United States. We know there is a strong demand for American goods which are of superb quality in the entire world. However, our initial focus is South East Asia (aka, ASEAN). As you may well be aware, the ASEAN region currently bears strategic importance for the US Government in terms of establishing strong trade relations in Asia, as ASEAN straddles geographically between China, India and the Middle East (refer to the TPPA framework which was recently concluded). In addition, the ASEAN population which is 650 million strong is the perfect ground to re-introduce and revive the fortune of American-made goods in Asia vis-a-vis Chinese manufactured goods. In order to facilitate trade, the 11 countries in the ASEAN region has formed the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), which was launched this year witnessed by President Obama in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia is currently the Chair of ASEAN and has been mandated to formally launch the AEC. All major ASEAN meetings and initiatives this year, in which a large part of it revolves around trade, is launched and initiated in Malaysia. Hence, we see this as the perfect storm to capitalize on the retail space of American products. In light of this, we would like to solicit your help in linking us with manufacturers/distributors of consumer goods in your city. Whilst we can approach Federal Institutions to get in touch with American manufacturers, there would possibly be no direct benefit to your city as their focus would be on companies which are more prominent on a national level, hence missing out on true gems of American manufacturing known to you, but not necessarily to them. Trust us when we say that our fellow Asians are more than willing to pay a premium to authentic American products, which are considered to be safer, long lasting and better value for money. By this, we do not want foreign made products with American labels, but products which are 100% American, as stated above. Perception is the key to profitable distribution, and Asians in general are highly receptive to American produce, and strive towards the American lifestyle (courtesy to Hollywood, Silicon Valley and Wall Street). What is in it for you? Simple, more jobs for Americans in your city. We hope to be a catalyst in growing both the American and Asian economies. History has shown time and again that more trade leads to increasing prosperity for all. We believe this is a highly workable venture, and look forward to discuss this further with you to design a feasible business model. We await your response with respect to the list of manufacturers/distributors and any financing proposals; such as the American Exim Bank and other export promotion agencies in the United States, which you may provide to support us in taking this off the ground. Thank you. 1 Best Regards, MR. ARIIVAZHAGAN SUPRAMANIAM Chief Executive Officer Robin Capital Sdn Bhd Suite 33-01, 33rd Floor, Menara Keck Seng, 203, Jalan Bukit Bintang, 55100 Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA Mob.: +6016-664 7314 Fax : +603-2116 5999 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ariivazhagan.supramaniam.3 Skype: alic.suyali Clia: 1929590613 YM: cdliverpool *glizepsis DEFINING EXCELLENCE www.edina.k12.mn.us Is ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 (952) 848-3900 November 19, 2015 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jim: Thank you for making time to attend the reception for our National Merit Scholarship students, their families, and the teachers they honored. It was a pleasure having you join us and help kick off the reception with a few words of welcome. Thank you as well for your continued strong support of Edina Public Schools and our District community. Warm regards, Ric Dretsen iSuperintendent NAYearly Planning\National Merit Reception\TY-Mayor.docx WE CARE V WE DARE V WE SHARE Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Taylor, Scott <Scott.Taylor@merrillcorp.com> Monday, November 23, 2015 10:53 AM Edina Mail James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; taylorsmnhome@comcast.net Attention City Council and Engineering IMG_1834.JPG; IMG_1836.JPG; IMG_1838.JPG; IMG_1858.1PG; IMG_1861.JPG; IMG_ 1862.J PG; IMG_1864.JPG To whom it may concern, As we continue to get closer and closer to next year's Roadway Improvements for the Golf Terrace B Neighborhood, I continue to want to stress the need for improvements at the Oak & St. Johns intersection. I will not be able to attend the December 8th Meeting unfortunately so consider this my families "offering of comments." This is not the first time I have sent pictures, nor do I expect it may be the last. I feel very strongly this issue needs to be resolved during the summer of 2016 and I am a firm believer that if I do not continue to "make noise" that this eyesore and safety hazard will get missed. Each time I send in pictures, it's because something has happened to encourage me to act once again. Last week, I watched a young person scooter around the corner and into the pile of leaves/water on the corner. As soon as he hit the leaves, he wiped out and hurt himself. Nothing but a scraped knee and elbow but he fell hard and could have hit his head and done a lot more damage. I tell you this because this was not rainy day; but a dry day in mid-November. The water you see there had been there for a couple of days. It is safe to say that 95% of the 365 days a year, there is standing water in that corner. Our neighbors to the West are much higher than we are and everything flows down to that corner from rainwater and their sump pumps. Once it collects there and is a safety hazard, an eyesore and a mosquito breeding ground, it slowly begins to flow south over Oak Drive. What doesn't flow down collects and is obviously doing a lot of damage to the curb and the pavement on that corner. Now that it is winter, I have enclosed a second set of pictures for your review because this morning, I watched a woman walking her dog; fall on her back as I was leaving my home. Again, besides her pride, I am not sure she was injured but this cannot and should not be allowed to keep happening on the corner in front of my home. As you can see, since the water backs up West on the north side of Oak drive, you can see that ice has now formed in the cutter for at least 4-5 houses and will most likely be there the rest of the winter, again creating more of a hazard for our neighborhood. If, or should I say when, someone is hurt I would hate for an aggressive & effective lawyer to search out whether our fine city knew there was a safety hazard and find my emails detailing our concerns. I hope this email finds its proper place and is taken as it was intended, not to complain or be "that resident" rather an email from someone who has concerns about the quality, appearance and overall effectiveness of our neighborhood. I would appreciate if someone were to contact me and let me know this email has been received. Thank you very much for the time. Scott Taylor 4600 Oak Drive Edina, MN 55424 952-926-8828 (H) 612-710-2060 (C) 1 Scott F. Taylor Senior Vice President - Sales Scott.taylor@merrillcorp.com www.merrillcorp.com 651-632-4187 office 612.710.2060 cell MERRILL BRIDGE Merrill combines expert services, technology and insights that customers across the globe require to securely organize and distribute their complex, confidential and regulated information. award-winning virtual data rooms I transaction and compliance solutions I language translations I marketing and communication solutions This email communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL or LEGALLY PRIVILEGED information, If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone number shown above or by return email and delete this communication and any copy immediately. Thank you 2 Heather Branigin From: Chris Bremer <bremer101@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 11:38 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Strachauer A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction comments Attn: City Council and Engineering I have looked over the engineering plan for this project, and overall it has many positive features. I have a few comments concerning ways the plan could be improved. 1. Most importantly: Parking on one side of most streets in our neighborhood will work just fine as proposed, but the plan is for parking to be on the east side of each street. It would be much better to have the parking on the west side of each street. Our neighborhood is basically one huge cul-de-sac, and when people come to visit they always drive into the neighborhood going south from 60th St. Therefore parking on the west side would be best. Otherwise we will have a lot of people making U-turns to park, or, with the narrower streets, they will likely be pulling in and out of our residential driveways to turn around before parking. 2. I also noticed that there is no plan to upgrade the lighting. While the lighting now is adequate for basic function, the fixture are old cobra-heads that are unattractive, shine too broadly (i.e. in people's bedroom windows) and do not help to preserve a dark sky. It would be best to have some new fixtures, which would give our neighborhood a more updated and residential appearance and would also limit excess light pollution. 3. Since we will have narrower streets and more grass, it would be wonderful if the city could help us plan for the addition of trees. As a neighborhood, we might be able to get a group discount from a nursery. It would be helpful to know what species would work well to beautify our neighborhood, how close to the curb they can be planted, and how we might coordinate the timing of tree planting with the street plan. Best regards, Chris Bremer 6001 Ewing Ave S 1 Heather Branigin From: Noelle Varecka <noellepetersonvarecka@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Clarification please To Whom It May Concern, I was just reviewing the proposed improvement No. BA-420 for Golf Terrace B a neighborhood roadway construction. Under "staffs recommendations to the city council" can you please clarify the following for the block that I live on 4604 Woodland Road West: 1. We WILL have 2 sided parking on our street, correct? 2. Are you narrowing our block to 27 feet and if so, what would be the benefit? We get a lot of foot and bike traffic from students and community members going Concord Elementary, French immersion, South View, the Community Center, parks and fields. During the same time, we also have a lot of vehicle traffic as well. If we don't have sidewalks, I think we should keep the road as wide as possible. Please clarify above. Thanks, Noelle Varecka Sent from my iPhone 1 Heather Branigin From: Becky S. Westergren <Becky.Westergren@hennepin.us> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:01 AM To: Marion Greene; khalverson@hopkinsmn.com; 'Anne@AnneMavity.org'; James Hovland; DickRMiller@gmail.com; duane.spiegle@parknicollet.com Cc: Allyson Lueneburg; Catherine M. Walker; Kerni Pearce Ruch Subject: Blake Station Area Subcommittee Sent on behalf of Commissioner Jan Callison: I would like to invite you to join the Blake Station Area Subcommittee of the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee. This subcommittee is being formed to bring key stakeholders from the public and private sector together to collectively focus on the transformation of the Blake Station area with the arrival of light rail. The Blake Station area provides a unique opportunity to create a transit oriented development district supported by public and private infrastructure investments that will maximize the return on investment for the larger light rail project. The Blake Station Area Subcommittee will be composed of public and private sector leaders with an interest in the success of the area and will provide for leadership to promote integrated and compatible plans, policies, and strategies. The first meeting of the Blake Station Area Subcommittee will be held on Monday, December 7, 2015 from 8:00 to 9:00 AM at the Hopkins City Hall (1010 1st St S, Hopkins, MN 55343). Future meetings are expected to occur every other month throughout 2016. I look forward to working with you on the Blake Station Area Subcommittee. Please RSVP to Katie Walker at (612) 385- 5655 or Katiemalker@hennepin.us. Sincerely, Jan Callison, Chair Hennepin County Board of Commissioners Chair, Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 1 At Thanksgiving more than ever, our thoughts turn gratefully to you. We appreciate your business and friendship. For this reason, we've made a donation to the following organizations on your behalf. Frauenshuh Cancer Center * GlobeServe • Defending The Blue Line FRAUENSHUH Commercial Real Estate Group Off awl 064/ 4241/fet DONATIONS MADE ON YOUR BEHALF TO: FRAUENSHUH CANCER CENTER Treatment at Park Nicollet Frauenshuh Cancer Center is designed to support body, mind and spirit through state-of- the-art medical treatment and integrative therapies. Generous donors make this outstanding care possible. Our donation on your behalf helps give hope to people with cancer and will help: • Deliver the highest-quality patient care • Use research to improve cancer care and treatment options • Offer patient support groups and education • Support well-being with massage, music therapy, spiritual care and more For additional contributions, please feel free to visit www.parknicollet.com/specialtycenters/frauenshuh-cancer- center/giving GLOBESERVE MINISTRIES GlobeServe Ministries and Pastor Sam Dunya, with the support of Lutheran Church of Hope West Des Moines, oversee and manage several community service projects. Projects include church planting, medical clinics, general health education, Frauenshuh Preparatory School and Frauenshuh Vocational School, water purification, well-drilling and farming. For additional contributions, please feel free to visit www.hopewdm.orq/mission qhana.htm DEFENDING THE BLUE LINE Defending The Blue Line®(DTBL) ensures that children of military members are afforded every opportunity to participate in the game of hockey. They accomplish this by providing free equipment for military kids, hockey camps, special events, and financial assistance for registration fees and other costs associated with hockey. On your behalf, we are proud to continue the support of this meaningful program. For additional contributions, please feel free to visit www.defendingtheblueline.org - 11131 niNG too', lot 101V - ,0100 H°1°° FOR oUR Ages 3-8 • Mittens/Gloves/ Hats/Scarves • Picture/Chapter Books • Games/Puzzles • Lego Sets • Creative Activities • Learning/Education Games • Dolls/Action Figures • Art Supplies Ages 9-12 • Mittens/Gloves/ Hats/Scarves • Chapter Books • Handheld Games • Sports Goods • Arts and Crafts Activities Accessories • Educational Games • Lego Sets • Dolls/Action Figures Only new, unwrapped donations will be accepted. VEAP does not accept used items, toys with candy, weapons, clothing, or household items. Holida Toy Drive vvwvv.holidaytoydrive.veap.org Bring gifts to the following locations Through December 11 Bloomington Edina Bloomington Civic Plaza Bremer Bank Bloomington Public Works Edina City Hall/Police Dept Creekside Community Center Edina Fire Dept Fairview Oxboro Clinic Edina Resource Center Jerry's Do it Best Hardware Edina Senior Center Oxboro Library Hennepin County Library-Edina Penn Lake Community Library Jerry's Do it Best Hardware RBCU-Lyndale Avenue Branch Qdoba (Southdale Mall) RBCU-Old Shakopee Rd. Branch Southdale Library Richfield Southdale YMCA Think Mutual Bank Bremer Bank Western National First National Bank of the Lakes RBCU-77th Street Branch Richfield Municipal Center Village Shores Toy Drop Off at VEAP 9600 Aldrich Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 Mon, Tues, Wed, Fri Thurs 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. 8:00 a.m. - 7.:00 p.m. Wish List Ages 0-2 Hats/Mittens/Blankets • Board Books • Push-pull-roll toys • Music/movement toys • Blocks • Cars/trucks Families • Board Games (Monopoly, Sorry, Clue, etc.) Most Needed Ages 13-18 • Mittens/Gloves/ Hats/Scarves • $20 Gift Cards to Local Retailers (Target, Kohls, MOA, Best Buy, Walmart etc.) • Chapter Books VEAP 9600 Aldrich Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 MAYOR JAMES HOVLAND CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH ST EDINA MN 55424-1394 NON PROFIT ORG US POSTAGE PAID PERMIT NO 2213 TWIN CITIES, MN T- 6 S-433 Please join us for a meet and greet with Lisa Horn, VEAP CEO Tuesday, December 1, 2015 Reception 6:00 p.m. — 7:30 p.m. VEAP Community Room 9600 Aldrich Avenue South, Bloomington Refreshments will be served Please RSVP to Patty Schulz at 952.955.8310 or pattys@veap.org by Friday, November 27 4144 NATIONAL LEAGUE 0F CITIES 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Standard P US POST pAni Lou isvifl Permit #- - A UTO"T# 18 JAMES HOVLAND CITY OF EDINA MAYOR 4801 W 50TH ST EDINA MN 55424-1394 S#2845 11.11.1111,1111"91,1.111.41.111 .1.1111,11111111.11111 Washington, D.C. has been attracting visionaries, revolutionaries, and doers since 1790. As a city leader, you fit right in. Be a part of a long history of men and women who have come to Washington to make a difference in your communities and in the lives of the families who live in them. Come to Washington, D.C. March 5-9, 2016, to become a history-maker for your community. Hear from federal policy makers and those vying to be the next President of the United States, as you prepare to advocate for cities on Capitol Hill. Register before January 31st for the early bird rate at www.n1c.orgiccc. March 5-9, 2016 I Washington, D.C. From: Carter Schulze Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 1:48 PM To: 'noellepetersonvarecka@gmail.com' Cc: Chad Millner Subject: RE: Clarification please Noelle, Thank you for your email request for clarification. The following are my responses to your questions. 1. We are recommending 1 sided parking on all streets within the neighborhood. For Woodland Rd, this would be the north side of the street. 2. The streets will be reconstructed to 27-feet from the vertical face to vertical face of the curb. In perspective, Woodland Rd is approximately 30-feet from the back of curb to the back of curb today and will be narrower by approximately 1-foot on each side of the street than it is today. If you have further questions, feel free to email me or call. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443! Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulzeREdinaMN.qov I www.EdinaMN.qov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Original Message From: Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:20 AM To: Carter Schulze Subject: FW: Clarification please Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Carter Schulze. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Original Message From: Noelle Varecka [mailto:noellepetersonvarecka@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Clarification please To Whom It May Concern, I was just reviewing the proposed improvement No. BA-420 for Golf Terrace B a neighborhood roadway construction. Under "staffs recommendations to the city council" can you please clarify the following for the block that I live on 4604 Woodland Road West: 1. We WILL have 2 sided parking on our street, correct? 2. Are you narrowing our block to 27 feet and if so, what would be the benefit? We get a lot of foot and bike traffic from students and community members going Concord Elementary, French immersion, South View, the Community Center, parks and fields. During the same time, we also have a lot of vehicle traffic as well. If we don't have sidewalks, I think we should keep the road as wide as possible. Please clarify above. Thanks, Noelle Varecka Sent from my iPhone Heather Branigin From: Bruce Artmann <96shadowrider@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 2:48 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering Re: Next year's Tracy Ave. project I looked over the project pages and it looks like the only plan is to add parking on the west side of Tracy Ave by Countryside park. You are eliminating all the parking that has been on the east side of Tracy. You didn't do that on Tracy north of Benton. I did write a suggestion at the last open meeting and I see it is included in these details. I would like to reiterate my request to consider adding parking across Tracy Ave from my residence. I think there is enough space for at least 2-3 parking spaces. I recognize that this will impact the residents on the west side of Tracy, but in my opinion not greatly. I know that there has never been parking allowed on the west side of Tracy Ave., but since you are adding the parking by Countryside park, you could consider my suggestion. Otherwise, if the engineers can make it work, they can put the parking on my side of Tracy. Thank you for the opportunity to present this. Bruce Artmami 6117 Tracy Ave 952-240-6155 1 Heather Branigin From: Pahoua Hoffman <phoffman@citizensleague.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:04 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Invitation to present at Citizens League Met Council Task Force Greetings Mayor Hovland: I received your name and contact information from Mr. Bill Hargis. As you may have heard, the Citizens League has convened a study committee to review the concerns around the Metropolitan Council with the goal to arrive at a set of recommendations by the start of the session. Here's a link to the project page. Mr. Hargis is a member of this committee as is Mr. Scott Neal. The committee has been meeting since September and will continue to meet through the end of February. The last couple of meetings were focused on narrowing a list of critical questions that have been raised in order to create pathways towards recommendations. As you can imagine, there were questions around transportation. To that end, we'd like to invite you to be part of a small transportation panel for either Thursday, December 3 or Thursday, December 17th, between 4-6pm. You'd join possibly 2-3 others. I will be able to give you more details as to the talking points we'd like you to address but for now, I just need to know when you might be available should this be something you'd be open to being a part of. Will you let me know? I have a planning meeting with the committee co-chairs tomorrow afternoon so I'd like to relay this to them — will you let me know by tomorrow Noon? Please pardon the rush - we only have a week in between meetings for me to organize speakers, so this is why I am just now coming to you after your name was recommended! Thank you in advance for your consideration. Thank you, Pahoua ***Citizens X'sk League Common ground. Common good. www.citizensleaque.orq Pahoua Yang Hoffman I Policy Director Citizens League 213 Fourth Street East, Suite 425 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651.289.1071 phoffmancitizensleaque.org Join us on 11. Donate today! 1 Heather Branigin From: Carter Schulze Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 11:20 AM To: '96shadowrider@gmail.com' Cc: Chad Millner; Andrew Plowman Subject: RE: Attn: City Council and Engineering Mr. Artmann, Thank you for your input on next year's Tracy Avenue project. We will provide you some feedback into the parking circumstances following the holiday as some of our staff that should provide input are out. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 I Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulzenEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doi g Business From: Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:00 PM To: Carter Schulze Subject: FW: Attn: City Council and Engineering Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Carter Schulze. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoaEdinaMN.clov I www.EdinaMN.ciov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Bruce Artmann [mailto:96shadowrider@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 2:48 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attn: City Council and Engineering Re: Next year's Tracy Ave. project I looked over the project pages and it looks like the only plan is to add parking on the west side of Tracy Ave by Countryside park. You are eliminating all the parking that has been on the east side of Tracy. You didn't do that on Tracy north of Benton. I did write a suggestion at the last open meeting and I see it is included in these details. I would like to reiterate my request to consider adding parking across Tracy Ave from my residence. I think there is enough space for at least 2-3 parking spaces. I recognize that this will impact the residents on the west side of Tracy, but in my opinion not greatly. I know that there has never been parking allowed on the west side of Tracy Ave., but since you are adding the parking by Countryside park, you could consider my suggestion. Otherwise, if the engineers can make it work, they can put the parking on my side of Tracy. Thank you for the opportunity to present this. Bruce Artmann 6117 Tracy Ave 952-240-6155 Heather Branigin From: tckoon@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Concerns Regarding Morningside A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Atten City Council and Engineering After reading the proposals for the reconfiguration in Morningside, the following items I find extremely objectionable: • A Narrowing of Streets especially Grimes Avenue and Sunnyside. This would a be first a safety issue. Witness Arden Avenue an adjacent and narrower street during the day there are always a number of cars parked on Edina streets in the older part of our community. The high number of cars parked on the street are due to remodeling projects, families with more than two cars , visitors, and those providing services to residents such as nannies, lawn services, cleaning services, etc. Narrower streets would lead to more accidents and delays in first responders attending to emergencies. A few years ago it was noted that Morningside would be adversely affected by delays by ambulance services and other emergency vehicles in first responding in some measures to slow traffic in a • Curb extensions at street corners present dangers of forcing bicyclists especially children and inexperienced younger people into the main lanes with the increase possibility of an accident. • The narrower 21 foot entrance of Grimes Avenue into Sunnyside. Because of the odd angle that the streets intersect going east on Sunnyside into Grimes especially when another car is headed south on Grimes requires a wider turn. Again a potential safety hazard. Just get rid of the curve street entrance installed a few years ago. • The proposed assessment would prove a hardship and steps must be taken to reduce the costs. After living on Grimes Avenue for 27 years and living in urban settings all my life, I do not find Grimes Avenue and Sunnyside Avenue busy with the present configurations. We need to all accept that with modern life, we all depend on private vehicles to meet our needs either personal transportation or those vehicles of service providers to our homes. Sincerely yours Thomas Koon 4410 Grimes Avenue Edina, MN 55424 TCKooncomcast.net 952-270-2779 1 Heather Branigin From: giovanna Ingram <giovanna1963@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 12:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 2016 Strachauer Park Neighborhood roadway construction Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hello, I realize its the day before Thanksgiving, so I don't expect to hear back from you until sometime next week... .but I'm playing catch up with my emails :) Question with regards to the planned road construction. Will homeowners be given the opportunity to have their main water line going from the home to the street replaced at the time the streets are torn up? If so.... how do we the homeowners contact the appropriate source? Thanks, Giovanna Ingram 1 Heather Branigin From: Mark Condon <mark@irc-law.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:20 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Janet Condon Subject: City Council and Engineering. Strachauer Park Dear Engineering We live on 6008 Ewing. We have large pavers within 12" of the curb and a large rock within 24" of the curb.they are both within the yellow flag" line" Will they be affected by the construction and if so who is responsible for moving them? Thank you Mark and Janet Condon Sent from my iPad 1 Heather Branigin From: cjceholm@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:37 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Strachauer Park Project A - Road Improvement Project Dear Edina Council Parking: One side parking proposal needs a re-look around the Strachauer Park. On game days the street parking on both sides stretches in all directions. I feel the traffic on west 62nd street to my corner of 62nd and Chowen. Thus one side parking will have people searching even farther for a parking place, extending greater than one block from the park. Parking On One Side: Would like to place a vote for parking on both sides on the street in front of residential homes. Chowen Curve Intersection #1: Gives continuity to Chowen Avenue Chuck and Carol Holm 6141 Chowen Avenue South (17 years) Heather Branigin From: Ron Searle <ronsearle@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 2:29 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Sunnyside Road Project James, As a long time (since 1975) Sunnyside Road resident I would like to add my support for the proposed changes included in next year's street project. Anything that in some small way helps deal with traffic volume and speed is welcome. Here are a few additional thoughts on the subject. • Private Meetings with City Staff - If this is true it sounds like government by "some" of the people. Let's keep the process open. • Traffic Speed - The calming devices and enforcement can deal with the speed. • Traffic Volume - To address the volume issue you need to figure our where this traffic is going. I suspect a lot of it is people going to and from south Minneapolis neighborhoods and highway 100. But traffic surveys or studies is the only way to find out for sure. The volume can only be shifted between streets unless larger scale traffic flows are addressed. Optimistically, the completion of the highway 100 project will help. In the mean time encouraging traffic to stay on the main streets seems like a reasonable solution. We appreciate your efforts in dealing with this issue. Ron Searle 4045 Sunnyside Rd 1 tMTIOHA ARROW DONOR prtrioruim' MATCH* Heather Branigin From: Del Steckler <dsteckle@NMDP.ORG> Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 3:30 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cindy Larson Subject: No parking on West side of Ewing Avenue City Council and Engineering Departments: I was reading on the Chowen Ave. neighborhood website today — that the City Council is voting on Dec. 8 for one-sided parking on Ewing Ave, which is where I live, as well as several other streets. I am totally against this — parking should be allowed on both sides of the street — it's been tradition to have parking in front of your house for your house. With parking on one side of the street, those of us living on the east side of the street — will have nothing but cars in front of our house all day long. Terrible. Thank you, for hearing my opinion. Del Steckler 5709 Ewing Avenue South Edina, MN 952-926-8016 Ms. Del Steckler, RN, BSN, MMA Cord Blood Recruitment Manager Cord Blood, Biorepository, and Affiliated Services 3001 Broadway Street N. E. Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55413-1753 Phone: (612) 884-8565 Toll Free: 1-800-526-7809 Fax: 612-460-4204 Donate cord blood. Give Birth to Hope. Learn More NN 1 Heather Branigin From: Steve Lerch <slerch@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:49 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Woodland rd west I am writing to express my concern about making Woodland Rd West (and others) more narrow. The benefit of doing this while not adding sidewalks is not easily understood. There are so many kids that use our road to walk and bike to school that the current plan seems to ignore. Kids safety should trump all other concerns. Please stand in my driveway and watch the kids head to and from school. A narrower street seems absurd. Besides the kids safety, home value should be a concern. Without sidewalks we looked at the size of the street as a benefit for our kids to be able to bike and walk. I am sure future homebuyers will do the same when they look to purchase a home in our neighborhood. I am sure there is some benefit to narrowing the streets, but it escapes me, and I doubt it is more important than keeping the kids safe. Before you vote on this, please visit our street after school and watch the kids walk/bike home. Ask yourself if fitting all those kids on a narrow street with all the car traffic is a smart plan. Thank you for your consideration. Steve Lerch 4605 Woodland rd West Cel 612 670 6821 1 Heather Branigin From: Traci Mercado <tracimercado@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 6:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Concerns regarding Woodland Rd West To whom it may concern, I am a homeowner on Woodland Rd West in Edina. I'm writing to express concern for the proposed street narrowing as part of the new street construction plan. Homeowners are being assessed a significant amount for the new road and as such should have input to the plan. I, along with several of my neighbors, strongly oppose the narrowing of our street. We do not have sidewalks on Woodland Rd W and there are several children on our street. Narrowing the street makes it less safe for our kids. Cars already use our street as a cut through and making it more narrow is a bigger risk to our kids who ride bikes and scooters in the street (since there is no sidewalk). Additionally, the kids on our street will be driving in the next few years and there will be a huge need for on-street parking. We have 40+ kids just on our street and one-sided parking will not be sufficient for the amount of cars that will need to be parked in the street. One of the reasons we purchased our home on this street was due to the large number of kids and the nice wide street that accommodates parking on both sides. Please change the plan to keep the width of our new road the same as the width of our existing road. Thank you, Traci Mercado 4609 Woodland Rd W Edina MN 66525 952-920-8090 1 Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Carrillo, Francisco <Francisco.Carrillo@hq.doe.gov> Sunday, November 29, 2015 6:28 PM Carrillo, Francisco Trujillo, Tara; Kennedy, Alison; Gibson, Kimberly Mission Innovation Paris Talking Points and Q & A.PDF Good evening, On Monday in Paris, President Obama, President Hollande, and other world leaders will launch Mission Innovation, a landmark commitment to dramatically accelerate public and private global clean energy innovation. Department of Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz invites U.S. Mayors to join him for a conference call this Tuesday, December 1st at 4:00pm EST to discuss Mission Innovation and COP-21 where he will highlight the role of clean energy innovation in combating climate change. Mayors interested in participating in this call can RSVP by responding to this email or by emailing Kimberly.Gibson@Hq.Doe.Gov. A conference line will be provided. Please see the fact sheet below for more information on Mission Innovation as well as a media advisory for Secretary Moniz's participation in COP-21. Additionally, you will find Paris climate conference talking points and CAA attached. Thank you, Francisco Carrillo Deputy Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental & External Affairs Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs U.S. Department of Energy (202) 586-3655 w (202) 631-0501 c THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary FACT SHEET: Mission Innovation On Monday in Paris, President Obama, President Hollande, and other world leaders will launch Mission Innovation, a landmark commitment to dramatically accelerate public and private global clean energy innovation. Through the initiative, 19 countries representing 80 percent of global clean energy research and development (R&D) budgets are committing to double their respective R&D investments over five years. These additional resources will dramatically expand the new technologies that will define a future global power mix that is clean, affordable, and reliable. The Breakthrough Energy Coalition, an independent initiative launched simultaneously with Mission Innovation and spearheaded by Bill Gates, is a global group of private investors that will take the risks that allow the early stage energy companies that emerge from the research programs of Mission Innovation countries to come out of the lab and into the marketplace. 1 Accelerating clean energy innovation is essential to achieving the goal of limiting the rise in global temperatures to below 2°C. While significant progress has been made in cost reduction and deployment of clean energy technologies, the pace of innovation and the scale of transformation is falling far short of what is required. Mission Innovation and the Breakthrough Energy Coalition constitute a powerful public-private effort to accelerate the research and development of affordable clean energy technologies efforts and support a new generation of scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs. To reinvigorate global efforts at clean energy innovation, all participants of both efforts share a common goal to develop breakthrough technologies and substantial cost reductions to enable the global community to meet our shared climate goals, increase access to clean and affordable energy, support economic development, and strengthen energy security. The group of 19 countries launching Mission Innovation spans the globe and accounts for over 80 percent of global clean energy R&D today. Participating countries include Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Denmark, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Norway, Saudi Arabia, Sweden, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States. These countries have also committed to regularly reporting on their progress towards the goals they have laid out as part of Mission Innovation. The initiative remains open to participation from other countries. The Breakthrough Energy Coalition (www.breakthrou Yhenet coalition.com) is a group of 28 influential investors from 10 countries committed to providing patient, early stage capital that will take innovative technologies from the world's great laboratories and build them into energy solutions at scale. In the past, too often energy technologies have not crossed the investment "valley of death" where there was little funding to develop ideas because the risk profile and long return time horizons. While the Breakthrough Energy Coalition is an independent effort and not formally affiliated with Mission Innovation, it is committing to bridge that valley of death for those technologies developed in the countries that sign up for Mission Innovation and have the best chance of providing affordable energy that is reliable to everyone. As part of its contribution to Mission Innovation, the U.S. Government will seek to double its current level investment in clean energy research and development over five years. New funding will initially be strategically allocated to early stage research and development, which offers the some of the greatest opportunities for breakthroughs and transformative change. The current the U.S. Government investment portfolio of more than $5 billion spans the full range of research and development activities — from basic research to demonstration activities (RD&D). The U.S. Government investment portfolio includes programs at 11 agencies with the largest investment at the Department of Energy (DOE). These programs address a broad suite of low carbon technologies, including end use energy efficiency, renewable energy, nuclear energy, electric grid technologies, carbon capture and storage, advanced transportation systems and fuels. At DOE, these programs are implemented through a number of mechanisms including cost-shared projects with the private sector research and development activities at the National Laboratories, grants to universities, and support for collaborative research centers targeted to key energy technology frontiers. Additional country commitments can be found at www.mission-innovation.net. 2 News Media Contact: (202) 586-4940 For Immediate Release: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 Energy Secretary Moniz to Attend COP-21 in Paris Energy Department to Showcase US. Technology Solutions to Combat Climate Change and Discuss Energy Innovation at UN climate talks in Paris WASHINGTON - On December 5th, U.S. Department of Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz arrives in Paris to attend the COP-21 United Nations climate negotiations to highlight the role of clean energy innovation in combating climate change and discuss recent breakthroughs in clean and renewable energy solutions. The Secretary will emphasize the role of the U.S. in leading the international community's fight against climate change and showcase the full range of technologies and policies in the clean energy "solution space." Throughout his time in Paris, the Secretary will participate in "Action Day," "Energy Day," and "Innovation Day." The Secretary will discuss the need for increased clean energy research and development funding here in the United States and globally — and the opportunities to leverage this funding through increased cooperation with the private sector. Finally, the Secretary will highlight the importance of utilizing international collaboration to find solutions for this global climate change problem. As part of the goal to focus on innovation, the Department of Energy will sponsor several booths at the La Galerie center throughout COP-21. These booths will feature cutting-edge technologies that have been helped by DOE's national labs, applied energy programs, the Advanced Research Projects Agency — Energy (ARPA- E), and other commitments to research and development. The technologies present at the Department's COP-21 booths will include: • A 3D-printed EV Shelby Cobra from Oak Ridge National Laboratory • A hydropower turbine designed for "low-head" areas like canals, rivers, and other lower-flow areas from Natel Energy • A 3-D printed model of the Transient Test Reactor (TREAT), a one-of-a-kind testing facility at the Idaho National Lab that will support advanced reactor development • A solar concentrating PVMirror solar system, designed by Arizona State University, which combines PV solar system with concentrated solar in one unit • A small modular reactor designed by NuScale in Oregon that demonstrates the advanced nuclear energy technologies being developed to provide clean energy options Additional details regarding Secretary Moniz's schedule and event participation to follow. ### 3 Paris COP 21 Climate change is no longer a problem for future generations — we are already feeling its effects in every corner of our nation and across the globe, which threatens our economic and national security. No country is immune, and therefore all countries must act together, and that is what the Paris climate negotiations are all about. This week, representatives of 194 nations will gather in Paris to negotiate a new global climate agreement that can drive a long-term solution to one of the gravest threats facing humanity. In Paris, the United States will be focused on securing strong climate action targets from all countries and creating a system that incentivizes countries to reduce their own emissions over time with high standards of transparency and accountability. To achieve this goal, the U.S. will focus on three major issues: • An ambitious framework for long-term climate action with targets by individual countries ratcheted up over time and a long-term goal to reduce carbon pollution over the course of the century. • Rigorous transparency to ensure countries are following through on their commitments to act. • Climate finance for low-carbon technology development and adaptation mobilized from a broad range of donors — both public and private — for those most in need. The President came into office convinced the United States had to take bold action to tackle climate change. We absorbed the hard lessons from past attempts to tackle this problem globally as in Kyoto and heeded bipartisan concerns. We concluded that targets should be set by countries themselves, not imposed on them; that all countries should be expected to act, even though developing countries face unique challenges; and that we should expect strong transparency and accountability from all countries. That is what we are seeking in Paris. By securing an ambitious, transparent, and durable international climate agreement in Paris, we can ensure countries like China are competing on a level playing field and are held accountable for their commitments to take ambitious climate action of their own. But while this is a very serious threat, action on climate change is also one of America's greatest economic opportunities. By reducing carbon pollution we can innovate, develop new markets, create new jobs, and continue to grow our economy. And we're already seeing tremendous progress in these areas. At home, since the President took office, wind energy has tripled and solar has increased twenty-fold. Cars are going farther than ever on a tank of gas thanks to our fuel economy standards, and we have for the first time set national carbon pollution standards for our power plants — the largest emitters of carbon pollution into the air. Action at home has allowed us to show that we are serious about taking on this challenge and also demonstrating leadership on the global stage. For example, China has pledged to peak its emissions, to bring online a gigawatt of clean energy every week through 2030, to implement a national cap-and-trade plan, and to provide $3.1 billion in climate finance. Following the historic joint announcement by the United State and China last November, more than 170 countries representing over 90 percent of global emissions — including major economies — have committed to 2025 or 2030 targets to curb harmful carbon pollution, including India, Brazil, and the European Union. If we are successful, an agreement in Paris would be the first time that the entire world has come together behind an ambitious and durable climate agreement. Q: How would you define success in Paris? • Our approach in Paris is centered on securing strong climate action targets from all countries, and creating a system that incentivizes countries to reduce their emissions over time with high standards of transparency and accountability. Specifically, it is important that the Paris agreement include the following features: • Ambitious framework for long-term action — building on the nationally determined approach used to encourage emission targets by country, a framework in which all parties agree to submit targets regularly, gradually ratcheting up their ambition, and guided by a long-term goal of reducing carbon pollution from the global economy over the course of this century; • Rigorous transparency — a robust transparency system of reporting and review for all, with a single set of guidelines and some flexibility for those developing countries that need it based on their capacity. • Climate finance for low-carbon development and adaptation — a shared effort among all countries to drive more financing to those in need through the use of public and private finance, domestic resources, enhanced investment environments in recipient countries, and improved transparency regarding the use of funds. • Complementary efforts — encouraging sub-national governments, enterprising businesses, innovative scientists and engineers, and the global public to continue to take actions of their own that collectively demand that global leaders do even more. • An agreement in Paris would be a turning point in terms of action on climate, supplying the confidence and the certainty countries need to act. It would show countries that if they act, their partners and competitors will do so as well. And it would send a clear signal that nations are committed to tackling climate change and that there is no going back. • If this happens, future generations will be able to look back on Paris as the first time that the entire world came together behind an ambitious and durable agreement to leave our children and grandchildren with a safer and more secure world. Q: What do you say to people that say the targets — as they stand now — really do nothing to take real action on climate? • Independent analysis shows that if countries implement their targets already submitted, temperatures will rise by 2.7° C by the end of the century, compared to 4.1 to 4.8 without action — a remarkable achievement, but still above the 2° C threshold the scientific community acknowledges as necessary to avoid the most severe impacts of climate change. • That's why a Paris agreement with an ambitious framework for long-term action, rigorous transparency, and climate finance is so important: It would drive even more ambitious reductions in the decades to come and help put us on track to keep global warming below the 2° C threshold. Q: What are you doing to fight climate change here at home? • On the domestic front, we have made real progress in advancing the goals of the Climate Action Plan. To reduce our greenhouse gases, we have announced the Clean Power Plan — which establishes the first- ever national standards to limit carbon pollution from existing power plants. • We have announced a solar jobs training program for veterans, and permitted five utility-scale renewables projects on public lands. • We have forged partnerships with industry to phase down HFCs, cut energy waste, and deploy more renewable energy, and we have taken important steps to address methane emissions in the oil and gas sector. • Today, we harness three times as much electricity from the wind and more than twenty times as much from the sun as we did since I took office. • By the middle of the next decade, our cars will go twice as far on a gallon of gas, and we have made unprecedented investments to cut energy waste in our homes and buildings, saving consumers billions of dollars in the process. • And when the actions already put in place are fully implemented, the President's Climate Action Plan will: o Cut nearly 6 billion tons of carbon pollution through 2030, an amount equivalent to taking more than 1.2 billion cars off the road for a year; o Enable the development of nearly 12,000 megawatts of wind, solar, and geothemial energy, enough to power more than 3 million homes; o Train more than 75,000 workers to enter the solar industry; o Save households and drivers nearly $300 billion on their energy bills; o Improve the energy efficiency of more than 1.5 billion square feet of city buildings, schools, multifamily housing complexes, and businesses across the country; o Protect the health of vulnerable Americans, including children and the elderly, by preventing 90,000 asthma attacks and up to 3,600 premature deaths. Q: What has the federal government been doing to lead by example in the fight against climate change? • The Federal Government is the single-largest consumer of energy in he United States. In March of this year, the President signed an executive order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the Federal Government by 40 percent over the next decade, and to increase the share of electricity the Federal Government consumes from renewable and alternative sources to 30 percent. As a result, taxpayers will save up to $18 billion in avoided energy costs. • Additionally, the Obama Administration released a new scorecard to publicly track the self-reported emissions disclosure and progress for all major Federal suppliers. • The combined results of these actions will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 26 million metric tons by 2025 — the equivalent of taking nearly 5.5 million cars off the road for a year. • The Department of Defense (DOD) is also making significant progress toward the Climate Action Plan goal of deploying 3 gigawatts of renewable energy by 2025: o In the past year, the Air Force developed a 16-megawatt solar array at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base and plans to expand its use of renewable energy, with more than 160 megawatts under development. o The Army announced three 30-megawatt solar arrays at installations in Georgia, the first of which broke ground in April 2015 at Fort Benning. The Army also unveiled an 18-megawatt solar array at Fort Huachuca in Arizona, and the Navy launched its Renewable Energy Program Office and announced plans to install up to 200 megawatts of renewable energy across 14 installations in California. o In September 2014, the Departments of the Navy, USDA, and DOE announced new contracts to construct and commission biorefineries capable of producing drop-in, military-compatible fuels. o Together, the contracts will result in more than 100 million gallons of clean, cost-competitive fuel that can be used in warfighting platforms and by commercial industry ALAN A. MADSEN City Administrator *City of Map , e Grove 6 4-6 V1,A , Al•-• A Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 10:42 PM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina : City of Edina Municipal Liquor Stores - is there any accountability? At the last Town Hall Forum I was told the city had a 'plan' to compete against new outside competition. This 'plan' is clearly not working and it is compounded with some poor oversight highlighted in the local press. I would like to hear at the Next Town Hall Forum this Saturday (Dec 5) at Pamela Park (10 a.m. - Noon) what the updated plan is for the City of Edina Municipal Liquor stores. Raising property taxes to cover the reduction in municipal liquor store income in an election year will more than likely have political implications. David Frenkel 612-237-1966 STRIB Editorial (see article below) Edina Mayor Hovland: "I know some people think we shouldn't be in that business," Hovland said. "But it's been really beneficial for our town. We're good at it and we're going to stay in it." Sun Current article on underage alcohol sales in Edina (see article below): Some of the locations for citations included establishments in Southdale, Galleria, Braemar Golf Course and one of the city of Edina's liquor stores. Edina cracks down on underage alcohol sales http : //current. mnsun. com/2015/11/27/edina-cracks-down-on-underage- alcohol- sales/ Municipal liquor stores: Minnesota cities don't belong in this business http://www.startribune.com/municipal-liquor-stores-minnesota-cities-don-t-belong-in-this-business/354131491/ 1 Heather Branigin From: Laura Plaetzer <laura@plaetzer.us> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 10:04 AM To: James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; swensonannl@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Robert Stewart Cc: Chad Millner Subject: Sunnyside Road Reconstruction Issues Mayor Hovland and Council Members— SETTING: We have lived on Sunnyside Road for 26 years. When we first moved in, there were only stop signs at the intersection of Sunnyside and France, no traffic lights. The only traffic lights were at the intersection of 44th and France. Gradually, traffic has increased on Sunnyside street to record amounts-3,000/day at the city's last count. Also, this is the main path for bicyclists to and from Lake Harriet. We have an incredible increase in the amount of bike traffic. We installed a picket fence when our kids were little (about 20 years ago) because of bikes on the sidewalks. 44th street, which is designated as a municipal aid street, does not have nearly the same amount of bike or walking traffic. On any given day, but especially in nice weather, we have people walking, some with dogs, some with babies, people with both babies and dogs, kids on bikes, groups of bikes, biking clubs all using the streets and sidewalks. Bikes are so constant that we have to look both ways before we cross our sidewalk or exit our cars if we park on the street. We've had many near misses with speeding cars, bikes without lights flying down at night, as well as cars passing us on the left when we are trying to turn into our driveway. I feel confident stating that there is no other street in Edina with such heavy bike, walking and car use at the same time. Everyone funnels onto our stretch of street to continue to Lake Harriet from all over Edina. This stretch of Sunnyside is the epitome of an Edina "living street". Mix 3,000 cars per day with the incredible amount of bikes and walkers—it gets to be a little crazy when the weather is nice! We need some help from the city. I don't believe that the city has clearly understood how people or how many people are using this portion of Sunnyside. PROBLEM: Our neighborhood has been involved in at least 2 meetings this past summer where we were able to ask questions, share experiences and make suggestions to the road project. My husband leads the email group within the neighborhood. There has not been much dissent among neighbors. A few neighbors had issues that they expressed with private meetings with Chief Engineer Chad Milner, but basically everyone was in agreement with the project even though many of us want more traffic calming devices like raised humps at intersections, marked crosswalks and a crosswalk to the park off of Grimes to 45th street, and an additional bump out just east of Townes Road on Sunnyside. Recently, a Morningside resident who lives almost a mile north of Sunnyside (who is on the Transportation Commission) posted comments about the project on the Nextdoor neighborhood email site, beginning 15 November 2015. In one of her posts, she proposed private meetings with her to discuss the project and her 1 solutions (she would not post them on the site so all could see). Unsure what her agenda was, but wanting more information, I met with her along with two other neighbors. It was clearly evident that she wanted to have the meeting to express her opinion about the project. One of her issues was that she is absolutely against any bump outs (when questioned about her dislike of bump outs she stated they just didn't "feel right" to her). There is a disconnect between what she wrote on the Nextdoor site, what she said to the Transportation Commission at the last 22 October meeting, and what she said in private. When the Star Tribune article came out with many quotes from her, in my opinion, it seemed like the purpose of the private meeting was part of her plan to derail the project on Sunnyside for fear of increased traffic on 44th street (Morningside and 42' also), and that she was trying to gain information from us to benefit her advocacy for 44th street. I wholeheartedly believe that there was no real conflict before she stated advocating and advertising her stand on the project. I just listened to the Oct 22 meeting and was surprised by her comments regarding 44th street (and Morningside in general) which reinforced my opinion of her intentions. At that meeting she stated that she believed that our 2016 project impacted the 720 other homes in Morningside, and was not about the 150 or so homes in the project area, and she was against any attempts to decrease the amount of cars on Sunnyside. To my knowledge, when any other roads in Morningside were reconstructed in the last 4 years, no other residents from other parts of Morningside were involved. I don't remember this advocate encouraging people to get involved with any of those reconstruction processes. Why does she believe that Sunnyside reconstruction warrants everyone in Morningside area getting involved? BTW—she also informed us that she was planning on meeting privately with Chief Engineer Milner soon to discuss her opinions regarding the road reconstruction project. I object to her efforts to try to control the project and her personal efforts to keep additional traffic off of 44th street. She is a volunteer with no professional training or expertise on a committee that is not elected. FACTS: 44th is a Municipal Aid Road. Astonishingly, the actuality is that 44th carries fewer cars than does Sunnyside, which is classified under the Edina Living Streets Document as a local connector roadway. Residents on 44th paid an assessment that was a fraction of the true cost of their project in 2011 because of this state aid. Their street is designed to carry many more cars, but the city refuses to drive more traffic onto 44th. Because of this refusal to design roads to direct traffic to the municipal aid road, residents on Sunnyside are carrying the financial burden of paying for more cars using our street than 44th street. We are being assessed unfairly (about $10,500-12,000 per home) (vs $2,500 for 44th Street) because we are paying for more cars wear and tear on Sunnyside than the municipal aid road which is truly designed to carry more cars and gets financial support from the state. We all know that additional cars wear out roads faster. Why should we carry that financial burden? Why should we pay for having more cars on our street than the designated street designed to carry more cars? Doesn't the city of Edina have a duty to drive additional traffic to 44th street, the Municipal Aid Road? What is the purpose of having a Municipal aid road if the city of Edina keeps reassuring residents on 44th that there will be "minimal impact" in terms of increased traffic on their newly widened road, after the Sunnyside/Grimes/Curve improvements? In actuality, the two bump outs and narrowing of the road is actually not much of a change from our current road. SOLUTION: Maybe the city of Edina should be forced by the state to (by not cooperating with the Certification of 44th Street as a Municipal state aid road) give up the Municipal Aid Road designation for 44th street if they have no intention of making it a true state aid road and give back the aid the state gave the city. To be fair to the residents on Sunnyside, if no additional traffic measures are implemented to make 44th carry more cars they 2 should willingly give up the designation as a state aid road and all the residents on 44th street and the city should be reassessed for the 2011 project as well as any projects going forward. Likely, residents would all owe an additional $6,000-8,500. Or, a better option in my opinion would be that the City council can approve the Morningside roadway project and let it move ahead while also considering additional traffic diversion measures to drive more traffic onto 44th street. Since we are already carrying more than our "fair share" of cars each day. (why shouldn't 44th be required to carry their "fair share" as a municipal state aid road? Surely, Edina must realize that they can't have it both ways). The city should not continue to ignore the fact that it needs additional traffic calming methods on this part of Sunnyside to drive traffic onto the municipal aid road if the city plans on keeping it as a municipal aid road. Additional successful traffic calming might include an additional bump out east of Townes Road on Sunnyside (around where the fire hydrant is to the side of 4055 Sunnyside) as well as raised humps (perhaps a different color) at the intersections of both Sunnyside and Grimes, Sunnyside and Curve, and on a crosswalk at Grimes and 45th Street. As the plan is now, there actually is not much that is going to happen on Sunnyside, 2 bump outs and a little narrower street. In front of my house, we will lose about 10 inches of roadway. Certainly, not enough of an impact to make anyone chose not to drive on Sunnyside because no one could possibly notice the difference of 10 inches on a 27' 10" wide street going to 27'. Maybe some of these drivers do not belong on Sunnyside anyway. The advocate stated that her husband enjoys driving from their house which is almost in St Louis Park to Grimes to Sunnyside to France because he can turn right on France without having to go through two lights that are timed together on France (a journey of about a mile with 5 stop signs) instead of driving down 42 street onto France which is the more logical way to go. QUESTIONS Why has the city refused to redesign this stretch of Sunnyside to specifically drive more traffic to the municipal aid road? Does the advocate for Morningside, on the Transportation Commission for at least 7 years, have the power to disrupt and stop these efforts? After all, she was the one asking about a dedicated left turn signal at the intersection of France and Sunnyside at the 22 October, 2015 Transportation Commission meeting (which would obviously greatly increase traffic onto our street, but keep it off of 44th). Another person, I believe it was Chief Engineer Milner, spoke up at the meeting and explained to her that it was a state of MN decision and that if there was ever going to be a left turn signal it would have to be on 44th, the municipal aid road. Clearly, her motivation is to protect 44th street regardless of the impact on Sunnyside. (Many people in Morningside consider Sunnyside to not be part of the Morningside neighborhood). Why does the advocate believe that every household in Morningside has a right to be involved in the redesign of Sunnyside/Grimes/Curve when she did not raise the same alarm for the redesign for 44th street, Morningside or 42. Will we never be able to make any traffic calming changes to Sunnyside because of the involvement from other Morningside residents who fear increased traffic on their streets? Is the city of Edina going to let the rest of Morningside derail the street project because of perceived increases in traffic? Can a city really let other residents influence a project when they don't live in the project area? RELEVANT MINNESOTA STATE LAW Minnesota Administrative Rules. 8820.0700 SELECTION CRITERIA. Subpart 1. Basis. A state-aid route must be selected on the basis of all criteria in either subpart 2 or 3. Subp. 3. Municipal state-aid street. A municipal state-aid street may be selected if it: 3 A. is projected to carry a relatively heavier traffic volume or is functionally classified as collector or arterial as identified on the urban municipality's functional classification plan; Accessed at: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rulesPid=8820.0700) Thank you. Laura Plaetzer 4058 Sunnyside Road 4 YIAMICE W. DIA01\ 6515 Gleason Court Edina, Minnesota 55436 (952) 933-1115 November 30, 2015 To; Mr. James Hovland---Mayor of Edina MN From; Maurice Dixon Subject; Proposed Property Taxes for 2016 Mayor Hovland, please share this with our council members. The proposed taxes on our home for 2016 are going up $1,049.96 which is 26% This is way out of line. Our government tells us the rate of inflation is very low. So low in fact, that people on Social Security will not get an increase in their amount for 2016 because the inflation is so low. The interest rate paid by banks is near zero--- Our property taxes are going up 26%---this has to be stopped. I live in a block of "Twin Homes" and have talked to some of our homer owners' association members, and they are also very up set with this increase. I know someone living near 74th and Wooddale---they tell me that their taxes for 2016 are not increasing. Please work with us and get this—"Way out of line increase" stopped. Please contact me with your thoughts on this subject. ueLvaz Maurice Dixon ---952-933-1665 CC Edina, City Council, Heather Branigin From: Steve Timmer <stimmer@planetlawyers.com> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 1129 AM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1 @gmail.com Cc: Scott H. Neal; 'Common Sense Edina' Subject: RE: Common Sense for Edina : City of Edina Municipal Liquor Stores - is there any accountability? Hello, everybody, I have had discussions about this issue with David a few times. I also read the Lopez piece in the Strib; it contained more sloganeering than I'd expect from Pat. Feeling her oats in her new gig, I suppose. Addressing the op-ed specifically, Pat calls Edina's liquor stores a "monopoly," I was unaware that I could no longer cross France, Excelsior, or 494 to shop at the Liquor Ogre, with its walls of plastic half-gallons of Captain Morgan and pallets of Miller Lite, and miss the thrill of derelict shopping carts scudding by in the wind in the parking lot, or even the stadium- like roar that greets one walking in the door. This is truly the American Experience. Where's Ken Burns? I submit that the sale of liquor remains a business that has to be regulated and, well, policed. I have more confidence in the city to do that, and to prevent sale to minors, than I would a private vendor. I am not as allergic to public enterprise as some, I suppose. On the taxes issue, the liquor stores regularly contribute a million dollars in round numbers to the city coffers each year. But it couldn't this year because of market conditions, including the opening of a new Liquor Ogre next door in Bloomington. The increased city tax levy is laid at the feet of the liquor stores. It's funny, though, county taxes also increased, and I was not aware that it is in the liquor business. Perhaps David and Pat can point out where I am wrong, but it seems to me that the situation means that taxes would have been higher in prior years without the liquor stores. In a way, we ought to blame the Liquor Ogre for our taxes going up. Now, obviously, you have to make a profit long term to justify the activity. But it's a pretty rare business that doesn't have to retool and reinvest from time to time to remain competitive. I am not in favor of throwing the whole thing over the transom in a panic. I prefer to shop at the Edina liquor stores with their friendly and knowledgeable service. The employees offer to walk my purchases out to the car — which I decline, saying that I'm not that decayed yet; the Liquor Ogre won't do that. But he will give the person behind me in line a cart to use to ram into my car. There is, naturally, the friendly little sign that says that the Liquor Ogre is not responsible for shopping cart damage. A case of Miller Lite and a jug of Captain Morgan isn't so cheap with a $1,000 deductible. (Just kidding; I don't go anywhere near that swill.) Steve From: Common Sense Edina [mailto:commonsenseforedinagmail.com] Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 10:42 PM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1(agmail.com 1 Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina : City of Edina Municipal Liquor Stores - is there any accountability? At the last Town Hall Forum I was told the city had a 'plan' to compete against new outside competition. This 'plan' is clearly not working and it is compounded with some poor oversight highlighted in the local press. I would like to hear at the Next Town Hall Forum this Saturday (Dec 5) at Pamela Park (10 a.m. - Noon) what the updated plan is for the City of Edina Municipal Liquor stores. Raising property taxes to cover the reduction in municipal liquor store income in an election year will more than likely have political implications. David Frenkel 612-237-1966 STRIB Editorial (see article below) Edina Mayor Hovland: "I know some people think we shouldn't be in that business," Hovland said. "But it's been really beneficial for our town. We're good at it and we're going to stay in it." Sun Current article on underage alcohol sales in Edina (see article below): Some of the locations for citations included establishments in Southdale, Galleria, Braemar Golf Course and one of the city of Edina's liquor stores. Edina cracks down on underage alcohol sales http://current.mnsun.com/2015/11/27/edina-cracks-down-on-underage-alcohol-sales/ Municipal liquor stores: Minnesota cities don't belong in this business http://www. startribune.com/municipal-liquor-stores-minnesota-cities-don-t-belong-in-this-business/354131491/ 2 Heather Branigin From: JoAnn Hillstrom <jahillst@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 2:32 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Attention: Strachauer Park A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Strachauer Park A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Public Hearing Notice I really like what you have planned for W. 64th street. I walk my dog along that street everyday and a side walk will really help make it feel safer. I do not like the idea of one-sided parking along the east side. I wouldn't like it even if I lived on the west side. The way things are now, I can see a clear opening to the street and walk safely. If you were proposing a sidewalk along the east side I would find this plan acceptable. If we were a neighborhood of completed tear downs people could park in their driveways and this plan might be acceptable. If the cost of the upgrade was cheaper on the east side of the street it might be acceptable provided it was a really big cost reduction. As it is, I think it is extremely unfair and unsafe to move all the parked cars to one side. Thank you, JoAnn Hillstrom 6005 Drew Ave So Edina, MN 1 Heather Branigin From: mjoas@comcast.net Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 3:31 PM To: James Hovland Cc: Joas, Margaret Subject: road conditions this morning November 30 Mayor Hovland, I need to express my concern and frustration about the awful road conditions in Edina this morning. All roads and intersections were glare and it was obvious that the roads were not treated this morning.Vernon Avenue at 7 am, the main thoroughfare, was not treated and was glare ice. The poor road condition this morning is not acceptable. Additionally, I am concerned about the hazardous conditions that Edina High School students face on Gleason Road by the intersection of Valley View Road . Many cars could not make it up Gleason's hill and this created other cars getting stuck and a long back up down to Creek Valley School. The safety of all Edina drivers should come first and obviously this was not the case this morning. In comparison at 5:30 am this morning, my husband saw four Hennepin County trucks that were out sanding this morning. Surely our City can do a better job treating the roads for the Edina citizens. Best, Margaret Joas 1 Heather Branigin From: Kathryn Koessel <kkoessel@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 5:30 PM To: mhorn@sehinc.com Cc: James Hovland Subject: Invisible Fence Dear Mike, I have tried unsuccessfully to have our invisible fence fixed by the City of Edina after the completion of the construction on 54th Street. I was promised that as soon as the road was paved and driveway concrete poured the fence would be fixed. I have called the city and left several messages for you over the past two weeks. The only message I received from you was asking whether I wanted to wait until Spring when irrigation systems are repaired. Of course, I responded "NO!" We cannot wait until Spring. We have two dogs. In addition, I have a lung disease which often prevents me from walking the dogs. I do not want the threat of winter weather to make fixing the invisible dog fence difficult. What do I need to do to get a response? Perhaps someone else is responsible for taking care of this. If so, can you contact them. Please respond to my request! As you can tell, I am getting very frustrated. Thank you for your immediate attention. Sincerely, Kathryn Kathryn C. Koessel 5401 Kellogg Avenue (SE corner of Kellogg Avenue and 54th Street) Edina, MN 55424 612.991.1226 1 Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Schnettler, Tom <Thomas.P.Schnettler@pjc.com> Tuesday, December 01, 2015 12:33 PM Edina Mail White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction White Oaks road reconstruction council letter.docx Follow up Flagged Mayor Hovland and Council Members, Attached is a letter in reference to the public hearing scheduled for Dec. 8 on the proposed White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. Thomas P. Schnettler Vice Chairman, Piper Jaffray Managing Director Merchant Banking Thomas.P.Schnettler@pic.com 612-303-6339 Piper Jaffray & Co. Since 1895. Member SIPC and NYSE. Learn more at www.piperiaffray.com. Piper Jaffray corporate headquarters is located at 800 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55402. Piper Jaffray outgoing and incoming e-mail is electronically archived and recorded and is subject to review, monitoring and/or disclosure to someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may be considered an advertisement or solicitation for purposes of regulation of commercial electronic mail messages. If you do not wish to receive commercial e-mail communications from Piper Jaffray, go to: www.pioeriaffrav.com/do not email to review the details and submit your request to be added to the Piper Jaffray "Do Not E-mail Registry." For additional disclosure information see www.piperiaffrav.com/disclosures 1 November 30, 2015 Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 West 591h Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Hearing on Proposed Improvement No. BA-438; White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council: We are writing to express our concerns about the proposed White Oaks C Roadway Reconstruction project. We have two concerns: 1) the project does not adequately address the excess storm water in the Townes Road marsh, and 2) the proposed assessment of $26,700 appears to be the largest assessment in Edina history and far exceeds the potential benefit to our property. Storm Water Issues The neighborhood has been waiting for many years for the City to address the problems created by the redirection of storm water into the low area on Townes Road. Since the City re-directed water from Country Club to this area in 2000, almost all the mature trees in this previously wooded area have died. There are a few remaining trees around the perimeter, but they are standing in water most of the year and are not likely to survive. There is stagnant water next to the road (with the associated odors) for most of the spring, summer, and fall. In December 2012, the Council expressed concern over the situation and directed that a wetland study be conducted and proposed solutions be combined with a street reconstruction project. The wetland study (finally completed in March 2015) confirmed that the re-direction of water caused by the 2000 storm water project resulted in the addition of significant amounts of storm water from a 3-acre area in Country Club into the Townes Road low area, raising water levels by 2.5 to 6 inches and changing the vegetation and character of the area. The study also noted that increases in impervious surfaces have contributed to water problems in the low area. The report noted that MHN 40b, the drainage area added in 2000, has a higher percentage of impervious surface than other sub watersheds that contribute storm water runoff to the low area. In addition, MHN_40, another contributing area, includes Grimes and 45th Street, which also have seen an increase in redevelopment and impervious surface in recent years. (See attached map.) These redevelopment projects have brought significant increased flows from beyond our neighborhood. The wetland study proposed a number of options to reduce flooding in the low area, ranging from a pumped outlet to underground storage to green infrastructure. However, the final proposal in the street reconstruction project includes only a recommendation for various tree wells on Sunnyside and Grimes. We are concerned these small changes in the curb and gutter system will not be sufficient to address the large volumes of water now rushing into the marsh after moderate and heavy rains. The neighborhood has worked diligently with the City for years to bring attention to the impact of the water redirection and to help devise solutions that would effectively reduce the water flowing into White Oaks from other neighborhoods. Our goal would be to restore the marsh not to its original wooded condition — that battle has been lost for now — but to a condition where it is again a neighborhood amenity rather than a smelly eyesore. We ask the City Council to press Engineering on why larger infrastructure improvements such as underground cisterns or permeable storm water piping are not a more realistic solution to the runoff problem. problem. [In the event pervious pavers are proposed by Engineering, we do not support the use of these pavers on Townes Circle, because 1) they do not address the largest source of run-off, which is from MHN 40 and MHN 40b, 2) they require regular vacuuming and even with maintenance are expected to lose effectiveness over time, and 3) they have not been used on residential streets in Edina and will visually separate Townes Circle from the rest of White Oaks.] If the City determines to proceed as proposed in BA-438 and continues to use the marsh as a wide area dumping ground for storm water, we ask the City to compensate the neighborhood in some manner in exchange for the use of this land for the benefit of other neighborhoods and to the detriment of White Oaks. In this regard, we want to remind the Council that part of the marsh was acquired by the City in a joint effort by the neighborhood association and the City to prevent residential development in the marsh (at that time the parcel was dry enough that residential development was possible). The neighborhood association contributed half of the cost to acquire the marsh parcel which was then put into City ownership. Suitable compensation for the neighborhood could come in the form of new street signage, improved street lighting, and burying utility wires that were previously inconspicuous due to the mature trees but now extend awkwardly over the cattails. These items would at least partially offset the loss of the trees and the conversion of this former natural area amenity to a storm water holding area. Cost of Assessment Second, we are concerned with the proposed cost of the White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project. At $26,700 per REU, this appears to be the highest special assessment ever imposed upon a neighborhood for such a project. We are not sure why the costs of the street reconstruction are so high. One factor in the cost per REU is undoubtedly the small number of REUs being asked to carry the costs of the project, including the costs associated with the city owned land within the project area. The reason the project area is so small is the White Oaks neighborhood has been divided into at least three separate roadway projects over the last 15 years. This division of the neighborhood appears to be largely due to various decisions to use low areas in White Oaks for storm water run-off. In 1999, a project on Maple Road added a storm pipe from Maple to the meadow on 48th Street. This was followed in 2004 by road reconstruction of 48111 Street, Maple and Meadow Road. In 2006, a storm pipe was added directing water from Bridge Lane to the 481h Street meadow, and Bridge Lane and a portion of Townes Road were reconstructed. As a result of this piecemeal approach to street reconstruction in White Oaks, only the northern portion of Townes Road and Townes Circle remain to be reconstructed. Due to the fact that this area is extremely hilly and includes the city-owned marsh, the cost of the project is divided among a very small number of residents. To illustrate the inequity of the proposed $26,700 assessment, in 2006, 4713 Townes Road was assessed $9,775. Now the immediately adjacent REU (4709 Townes Road) is being asked to pay an assessment which represents a 173% increase from that paid by their next-door neighbor. This disparity also highlights that the proposed assessment does not bear any reasonable relationship to the actual benefits to the affected properties. We ask the City Council to consider ways to mitigate the cost per REU to something much lower, which is fair in light of past assessments made on other REUs in White Oaks and similar neighborhoods. If there is no acceptable way to mitigate the proposed assessments, we ask the City to postpone the project altogether until the costs can be spread over a larger area, be more equitable, and bear some reasonable relationship to the value being created by the roadway improvement project. Unfortunately, neither of us is able to attend the City Council meeting on December 8. We have attended many other meetings on this project over the past years and have met with the City Engineer and members of the City Council to explain our concerns. We urge you to find a more equitable plan for our neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration. Tom Schnettler and Cheryl Appeldorn 4611 Townes Circle Edina, MN 55424 Attachment Heather Branig in From: michelle horan <mhoran00@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 2:19 PM To: James Hovland Subject: EEC - Bloomington Mayor Hovland, Thank you again for meeting with both John Anderson and me to learn more about Conservation Minnesota. You may remember John mention that he is working with a group in Bl000mington interested in having the City establish an environmental commission. Although Mayor Winstead is open to the idea, he does have some reservations. We were wondering if you might be willing to contact Mayor Winstead and share your experience with the EEC and it's positive impacts on Edina? Thank you for your time. Michelle Horan Conservation Minnesota Board Member 1 Heather Branigin From: Del Steckler <dsteckle@NMDP.ORG> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 6:21 PM To: Edina Mail; Dan Cornejo Cc: Cindy Larson Subject: RE: No parking on West side of Ewing Avenue Lynette — thank you for forwarding my email. Please also forward this email to the Mayor and the Engineering Department: Hi, Dan, I meant to copy you on my ft email to City Hall re: putting "No Parking" signs on the West side of our streets — at Chowen, Drew and Ewing. I can't believe your earlier Comprehensive Plan developed for the City would ever include something like this? Did it? If it did, we need to talk. It feels so invasive of our neighborhood to have "No Parking" signs running all along the West side of the street, not to mention the limitation of parking on one side. I love my neighborhood, but not with" No Parking" signs running all along the West side of the street and extra cars parked in front of my house. I've been told that a study was done and the purpose is to make the streets more livable since there are no sidewalks in our neighborhood. I've also heard that the streets are going to be more narrow? Seriously? I know you're out of the country on vacation, but when you return later this week, please call me, either at home or at work. We've just moved downtown into our new building — my number is below. I would like your help in delaying the vote next Tuesday, Dec. 8 at the City Council meeting until a survey can be done of all households in these neighborhoods. If, at the completion of that survey, not a study, all residents vote to accept "No Parking" signs on the West side of the street, then I'll have to live with those miserable signs and the narrow streets. Can you please come to that meeting with me? Talk to you soon. Del Del Steckler 5709 Ewing Avenue South Edina, MN Ms. Del Steckler, RN, BSN, MMA Cord Blood Recruitment Manager Cord Blood, Biorepository, and Affiliated Services 500 N 5th Street Minneapolis, MN 55401-1206 1 Phone: (763) 406-8565 Toll Free: 1-800-526-7809 BE THE. MATCH' Donate cord blood. Give Birth to Hope. Learn More From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:IbiunnoPEdinaMN.gov] On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 9:14 AM To: Del Steckler <dsteckle@NMDP.ORG> Subject: RE: No parking on West side of Ewing Avenue Dear Del, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. Your message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and the Engineering Division. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoaEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.qov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Del Steckler [mailto:dsteckleftNMDP.ORG] Sent: Friday, November 27, 2015 3:30 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cindy Larson Subject: No parking on West side of Ewing Avenue City Council and Engineering Departments: I was reading on the Chowen Ave. neighborhood website today — that the City Council is voting on Dec. 8 for one-sided parking on Ewing Ave, which is where I live, as well as several other streets. I am totally against this — parking should be allowed on both sides of the street — it's been tradition to have parking in front of your house for your house. With parking on one side of the street, those of us living on the east side of the street — will have nothing but cars in front of our house all day long. Terrible. Thank you, for hearing my opinion. Del Steckler 5709 Ewing Avenue South Edina, MN 952-926-8016 Ms. Del Steckler, RN, BSN, MMA Cord Blood Recruitment Manager Cord Blood, Biorepository, and Affiliated Services 3001 Broadway Street N. E. Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55413-1753 Phone: (612) 884-8565 Toll Free: 1-800-526-7809 Fax: 612-460-4204 NATION* MARROW' DONOR OgRA fie 43 BE T HE MATCH* Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Disbanding of Bike Edina Working Group Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: According to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) bylaws: "Meeting and activities of Bike Edina shall be suspended if no member of the Edina Transportation Commission is available to serve on Bike Edina or if the minimum number of regular Bike Edina members cannot be established. The Edina Transportation Commission shall notify the City Council in writing if the meetings and activities of Bike Edina have been suspended. If the activities of Bike Edina have been suspended for at least six months, the working group will be disbanded and this section of the Edina Transportation Commission bylaws will be deleted." The Bike Edina working group last met in May of 2015. Since that time, their meetings have been suspended due to low membership (please refer to Manager Neal's Friday Report of July 31, 2015, attached). Since the Bike Edina working group has not met for at least six months, they are now disbanded as per the ETC bylaws. Additionally, the Bike Edina section of the ETC bylaws will be deleted (please see attached). ATTACHMENTS: Description ETC Bylaws - Bike Edina Deleted July 31, 2015 Friday Report (Part) Transportation Commission Bylaws 1 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 Section 1: Introduction The bylaws outlined below are approved procedures for the Edina Transportation Commission. Members should review and understand City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1 and Chapter 2, Article III, Division 9 included in the appendix of these bylaws. In the event of a conflict between the City Code and the Edina Transportation Commission bylaws, the City Code will prevail. Some components of these bylaws are common across all City boards and commissions. From time to time the City Council may make changes to board and commission bylaws and will notify the board and commission of these changes. Boards and commissions should consult with their staff liaison if they want to propose a change to the bylaws. Proposed bylaw amendments should be announced one meeting prior to voting on the proposed change. Bylaw amendments require the approval of a majority of the voting Edina Transportation Commission members and approval by the City Council. In addition to the City Code and these bylaws, the Edina Transportation Commission will be guided by those policies and procedural documents applicable to the Edina Transportation Commission or City advisory boards in general. Copies of these documents will be made available to members at the beginning of their service with the Edina Transportation Commission. Section 2: Mission and Business Address Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-78 and Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 9, Section 2-313 for the Edina Transportation Commission mission. The business office for the Edina Transportation Commission is located at: Edina Engineering Department, 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota, 55439. Members of the public can also contact the Edina Transportation Commission at mail@edinamn.gov. Section 3: Membership Membership Composition Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1 and Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 9, Section 2-314. Terms of Membership Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-81. Contact Information Edina Transportation Commission members are required to provide a mailing address and phone number and/or email address to the City Clerk. This contact information is available to Project Coordinator and members of the public. Responsibilities Edina Transportation Commission members are expected to be present and adequately prepared for all meetings and to actively participate in meeting discussions. Members who are unable to complete assigned tasks should notify the Chairperson as soon as possible. Transportation Commission Bylaws 2 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 Attendance Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-86. If a member cannot attend a regular meeting, he or she should notify the Staff Liaison as soon as possible and ideally no later than two hours prior to the start of the meeting. Cancelled meetings will be counted as meetings held and attended for purpose of calculating attendance percentages. Resignation or Removal Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-81. The Edina Transportation Commission may ask the City Council to review a member’s appointment based on the member’s failure to perform the responsibilities outlined above. Section 4: Meetings Meeting Notice Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-84. All board and commission meetings are open to the public. To comply with legal requirements and ensure accessibility to the public, the Staff Liaison gives official notice of all Edina Transportation Commission meetings on the City’s website and at City Hall. Regular Meetings Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-84. Regular meetings of the Edina Transportation Commission are held at Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424 or another officially noticed location on the third Thursday of the month. A regular meeting may be rescheduled by the Edina Transportation Commission at a prior meeting. Annual Meeting In February, the Edina Transportation Commission will hold an annual meeting to: • Elect officers for the upcoming year, • Review and update bylaws as necessary, and • Affirm the regular meeting schedule for the upcoming year. Special Meetings Special meetings of the Edina Transportation Commission may be called by the Chairperson, City Council, City Manager or by the directive of a majority of the Edina Transportation Commission voting members. Members will be notified of the special meeting by written or email communication at least three calendar days in advance of the meeting. To comply with the open meeting law and to ensure accessibility to the public, the Staff Liaison posts official notice of all special meetings. A quorum is not required for special meetings; however, members cannot take action on a motion unless a quorum is present. Canceling Meetings Meetings of the Edina Transportation Commission can be cancelled by the Chairperson, City Council, City Manager or by the directive of a majority of the Edina Transportation Commission voting members. Meetings may be cancelled for insufficient business, lack of quorum, conflict with a holiday, inclement weather, or in the event of a community emergency. Transportation Commission Bylaws 3 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 Quorum Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-84. Meeting Agendas Meeting agendas will be prepared by the Chairperson in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. Members may request that items be added to the agenda; however, the addition of such items is subject to approval by a majority of the voting members. The meeting agenda and related materials will be sent electronically and/or mailed the Thursday prior to the scheduled regular meeting. Meeting Proceedings During regular meetings, business will be conducted in the order listed below. The order of business may be changed with the support of a majority of the voting members. • Call to order • Roll call • Approval of agenda • Approval of minutes from preceding meeting • Public hearings • Community comment • Reports and recommendations • Correspondence • Commission comments • Staff comments • Adjournment Meetings will be conducted according to the latest edition of Roberts Rules of Order. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda that is relevant to the Edina Transportation Commission. Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes. The Chair has the right to limit the number of speakers making similar statements and to limit comments related to matters previously discussed. The Edina Transportation Commission is not required to respond to the comments. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, disruptive behavior such as the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing is not allowed. Motions and Voting A simple majority of voting members present and voting will decide all motions before the Edina Transportation Commission. At the request of a member, a roll call vote will be taken when there is a divided vote on any item. A tie vote on any motion will result in a failure to pass. Student members are not eligible to vote. Meeting Minutes Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-85. City staff will prepare minutes for Edina Transportation Commission meetings. The minutes will include which members were present and absent, a summary of each item discussed and any motions proposed, and the votes on those motions. If a member of City staff is not present to record Transportation Commission Bylaws 4 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 minutes, the Edina Transportation Commission will appoint a secretary to prepare the minutes. The secretary will prepare draft minutes within two weeks of the meeting date and forward the draft to the Chair and City Staff Liaison. Approved minutes will be posted on the City’s website and forwarded to the City Clerk for distribution to the City Council by the City Staff Liaison. Section 5: Officers Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-83. The Edina Transportation Commission will hold elections for the officer positions of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson at the annual meeting in February. The Chairperson may make and second motions and vote on all motions. The duties of the Chairperson include but are not limited to: • Prepare the agenda in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. • Lead the meeting in accordance with the agenda and facilitate discussion on agenda items. • Invoke a reasonable time limit for speakers during public testimony. • Ensure that the bylaws are followed and actions are properly taken. • Maintain meeting decorum. • Extend meetings or schedule special meetings as necessary. • Cancel meetings, in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. • Facilitate the development of the annual work plan. • Develop annual calendar of anticipated agenda items for each month. • Consult with members regarding attendance issues. • Encourage active participation by Edina Transportation Commission members and members of the public. The Vice Chairperson performs the duties of the Chairperson in his/her absence. If both the Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson are absent, an acting chairperson may be assigned in advance by either officer or at the meeting by a majority vote of the members. Section 6: City Staff Liaison Refer to City Code Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1, Section 2-79. The Edina Transportation Commission has a City Staff Liaison appointed by the City Manager. The City Staff Liaison is expected to work cooperatively with Edina Transportation Commission members. Members may not direct City staff but can request assistance through the City Staff Liaison to carry out the Edina Transportation Commission mission. The duties of the City Staff Liaison include but are not limited to: • Work with Chairperson to prepare and distribute meeting agendas. • Reserve meeting rooms and other needed meeting equipment. • Record and prepare meeting minutes (or delegate the responsibility to another City staff member). • Provide technical expertise and access to City resources. • Work with Chairperson to ensure bylaws are followed and annual work plans are submitted. • Relay information or directives from City Council meetings or work sessions relevant to the Edina Transportation Commission. • Respond to Edina Transportation Commission inquiries in a timely manner. Transportation Commission Bylaws 5 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 • Forward information to and between Edina Transportation Commission members. • Record meeting attendance, include the current attendance record with each packet, and consult with the Chairperson and designated staff regarding attendance issues. • Provide orientation materials to new members and Chairperson. • Handle funds allocated to the Edina Transportation Commission in accordance with its directives, City policies and legal requirements. • Serve as the custodian of Edina Transportation Commission records. • Work with City Clerk to serve all notices required by law or these bylaws. Concerns with the performance of the City Staff Liaison should be directed to the Assistant City Manager. Section 7: Committees and Working Groups Introduction Committees or Working Groups may be established by a majority vote of the Edina Transportation Commission to study issues in greater depth and report findings. Committees or Working Groups present their analysis to the Edina Transportation Commission for discussion and recommendations. The Edina Transportation Commission has the sole authority to make final recommendations on all matters on which a Committee or Working Group has given guidance. The Edina Transportation Commission defines the scope and the duration of the Committee or Working Group’s mission. In no case may the Committee or Working Group exceed the authority granted by the Edina Transportation Commission. Committee and Working Group participants may not include enough voting Edina Transportation Commission members to constitute a quorum for the Edina Transportation Commission. Committees or Working Groups may be designated as standing (ongoing) or temporary in nature. Definitions Committees and Working Groups may be comprised of two or more people, one of whom is the Chair appointed by the Edina Transportation Commission. A Committee is comprised of current Edina Transportation Commission members only. A Working Group is led by an Edina Transportation Commission member, but will also include members of the public. Working Group Announcement Notice will be given to the public of the formation of any Working Group, including a press release from the City to local media outlets. Individuals will have a minimum of 14 days after the public notice to express interest in joining before members are selected. Public Access Based on the potential public interest in the topic, some Committee and Working Group meetings may be designated as public meetings by the Edina Transportation Commission or the City Council. If a Committee or Working Group’s meetings are designated as public meetings, official meeting notices, written agendas and written minutes are required. Refer to Section 4 of these bylaws for additional information on meeting notices. Transportation Commission Bylaws 6 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 Appointments and Chair Assignments Committees: The Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson will ask for Committee volunteers from the Edina Transportation Commission membership. A majority vote may approve the Committee appointments once sufficient volunteers are established. A temporary Committee Chair will be appointed by the Transportation Commission at the time of Committee formation. The Committee will elect its own Chair and notify the Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson. Working Groups: The Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson will ask for volunteers from the Edina Transportation Commission to serve as the Working Group Chair. The Working Group Chair is approved by a majority of the Edina Transportation Commission members. The Working Group Chair will recommend other Working Group members. By definition, those members will include individuals outside of the Edina Transportation Commission. The Chair may also nominate a co-chair who is not an Edina Transportation Commission member. Working Group appointments will be made by a majority vote of Edina Transportation Commission members. The duties of the Committee or Working Group Chair(s) include but are not limited to: • Set the meeting schedule and, if required, notify the City Staff Liaison for public notification. • Prepare and distribute a written meeting agenda, if required. • Lead the meeting in accordance with the agenda and facilitate discussion on agenda items. • Ensure that this section of the bylaws and Edina Transportation Commission directives are followed. • Maintain meeting decorum. • Recommend members and notify Edina Transportation Commission of changes in membership (Working Group only). • Report on the Committee or Working Group’s activities at each regular Edina Transportation Commission meeting. • Communicate to the Committee or Working Group any directives, questions or input from the Edina Transportation Commission. Resignation or Removal A Committee or Working Group member may voluntarily resign by submitting his or her written resignation to the Chair of the Committee or Working Group. A Committee or Working Group member may be removed by a majority vote of the Edina Transportation Commission. Disbanding A Committee or Working Group may be disbanded at any regular meeting of the Edina Transportation Commission by a majority vote of the members. Committees or Working Groups will automatically be disbanded if no member of the Edina Transportation Commission is available to serve or appropriate volunteer membership cannot be established. Bike Edina The City Council has established Bike Edina as a standing work group of the Edina Transportation Commission. The purpose of Bike Edina is to support the mission of the Edina Transportation Commission and advise the City on bicycling- related issues. The mission of Bike Edina is to advance cycling in Edina by: • Advocating for a complete bicycle transportation network that serves cyclists of all ages and abilities, safely, comfortably and conveniently; Transportation Commission Bylaws 7 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 • Serving as a voice and resource for city staff and elected/appointed officials, school district and community on bicycling-related issues; • Furthering public awareness and acceptance of bicycling as a fun, safe, convenient, healthy and sustainable mode of transportation and form of recreation, year around; and • Working collaboratively with other organizations to advance our mission for a progressive bicycle-friendly community where everyone can integrate cycling into their daily lives. Bike Edina has established bylaws that are consistent with the intent of this section. Amendments to the Bike Edina bylaws shall be made by a majority vote of the Bike Edina members and approved by a majority vote of the Edina Transportation Commission. Bike Edina will submit an annual work plan to the Edina Transportation Commission by July 1 of each year for review and approval. Meeting and activities of Bike Edina shall be suspended if no member of the Edina Transportation Commission is available to serve on Bike Edina or if the minimum number of regular Bike Edina members cannot be established. The Edina Transportation Commission shall notify the City Council in writing if the meetings and activities of Bike Edina have been suspended. If the activities of Bike Edina have been suspended for at least six months, the working group will be disbanded and this section of the Edina Transportation Commission bylaws will be deleted. Section 8: Communication Applicability This section applies to all types of media and communication methods including face-to-face, telephone, email and social media. Communication Between Members Outside of Meetings Edina Transportation Commission related communication between members when a quorum of voting members is present constitutes a violation of Open Meeting laws if it takes place outside of publicly-noticed meetings. Members are prohibited from discussing Edina Transportation Commission business in such a situation. Since email communication is common outside of meetings, the following email protocol is adopted: • Any email communication intended for a majority of Edina Transportation Commission members should go through the City Staff Liaison so that an appropriate record can be established. • Members should not respond “reply all” to group messages. • Members should not blind copy (bcc) other members. Members must not engage in a serial discussion of Edina Transportation Commission business. A serial discussion occurs when members discuss official business with a majority of voting members through successive communications. Serial communication can occur through a combination of communication methods such as face-to-face, email, telephone or on a social media site. Communication with the Public Outside of Meetings Edina Transportation Commission members are encouraged to share their work with members of the public within the guidelines noted in the paragraph below. Transportation Commission Bylaws 8 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 When communicating Edina Transportation Commission business with the public, members should understand and convey the following: • The deliberations and decisions of the Edina Transportation Commission will be based solely on information contained in the public record presented to all Edina Transportation Commission members participating in the deliberation or action. • The member’s comments do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of other commissioners or the Edina Transportation Commission as a whole. Members should exercise care not to communicate how they intend to vote on any pending matter or give the appearance any matter has been pre-decided. Public Announcements and Press Releases The City’s Communications and Technology Services Department will approve and coordinate any public announcements, press releases or other media contact desired by the Edina Transportation Commission. Section 9: Financial Transactions All financial expenditures by the Edina Transportation Commission must relate to the Edina Transportation Commission mission and be covered under the Edina Transportation Commission budget. All expenditures must be approved in advance by a majority of the voting members. The City Staff Liaison is responsible for ensuring that all approved expenditures or reimbursements meet the criteria above as well as other City financial policies. Expenditures that do not meet the criteria above will not be reimbursed. The Edina Transportation Commission does not have the authority to execute contracts or to otherwise financially obligate the City of Edina. Any contract related to Edina Transportation Commission business will be managed by the City Staff Liaison and may be subject to City Council approval. Section 10: Ethical and Respectful Conduct Conflict of Interest Members may not use their position on the Edina Transportation Commission for personal benefit. The interests of the Edina Transportation Commission must be the first priority in all decisions and actions. Any member who has a financial interest in, or who may receive a financial benefit as a result of, any Edina Transportation Commission action or decision must disclose this fact as a conflict of interest. A member who has disclosed a conflict of interest should abstain from discussion and voting on the matter. Gifts Edina Transportation Commission members may not receive personal gifts from any “interested person” in conjunction with their board or commission duties. An “interested person” is a person, or representative of a person or an association, who has a direct financial interest in a recommendation under the Edina Transportation Commission’s purview. This section does not apply to lawful campaign contributions. The Edina Transportation Commission may recommend acceptance of general gifts or donations through the City’s donation policy. Transportation Commission Bylaws 9 | Page Updated 2015.08.19 Respectful Behavior The City of Edina is committed to providing a work environment free from violence for all elected and appointed officials, employees and visitors. The City does not tolerate any form of violence in the workplace including threats or intimidating actions by or against any of the groups cited above. Violence and threats may include, but are not limited to: • Any act which is a physical assault • Any threat, behavior or action which is interpreted by a reasonable person to carry the potential to harm or endanger the safety of others, or result in an act of aggression, or destroy or damage City property. The Chairperson and City Staff Liaison have the right to call for the immediate removal of anyone who threatens or commits an act of violence on City property. Respectful behavior also includes how Edina Transportation Commission members relate to each other, City staff and members of the public. Members share a joint responsibility in modeling, monitoring and addressing behavior within the group. During Edina Transportation Commission interactions, members should strive to: • Treat people with courtesy, politeness and kindness • Encourage others to express their opinions and ideas • Listen to what others have to say • Use the ideas of others to improve decisions and outcomes • Recognize cultural differences Members should avoid: • Speaking over or cutting off another individual’s comments • Insulting, disparaging or putting down people or their ideas • Bullying other members by displaying a pattern of belittling, demeaning, judging or patronizing comments. How to Report Members can report cases of unethical conduct to the City Staff Liaison, Assistant City Manager, City Manager or City Attorney. 11/23/2015 July 31, 2015 Friday Report http://us8.campaignarchive2.com/?u=d26a74d1a98d6d3253219b5f2&id=9d18c89518&e=a9b4c42d79 2/3 The Driving Range Expansion/Par 3 project at Braemar Golf Course is under way. Earthwork and shaping has begun on the driving range and new Par 3 Golf Course. In the coming weeks, you will see the new teeing area and target greens take shape. At the conclusion of this project next spring, Braemar will have one of the finest practice facilities in the Twin Cities. Buckthorn Removal The City hosted a group of 125 volunteers from River Valley Church July 25 to do a collaborative buckthorn removal project at Bredesen Park. The volunteers were assisted by eight City staff members who helped to facilitate and direct the volunteers. It was a wonderful effort and accomplished a lot of work. Employee News Doug Wagner and Mike Lutz will retire from the Police Department today after 21 and 42 years of service, respectively. Jeff Buffie has announced his retirement from the Engineering Division in September. Partners In Energy Planning Committee As I mentioned at the July 21 Council meeting, I will ask the Council to approve a proposal for appointing this committee at the Aug. 5 Council meeting. The proposal will not be ready for the Council packet. I will get it out to Council Members, and posted online, as soon as possible. Bike Edina Working Group The Transportation Commission’s Bike Edina Working Group last met in May. The bylaws of the Transportation Commission say that the meetings and activities of Bike Edina shall be suspended if no member of the Edina Transportation Commission is available to serve on Bike Edina or if the minimum number of regular Bike Edina members cannot be established. The bylaws also require the Edina Transportation Commission to notify the City Council in writing if the meetings and activities of Bike Edina have been suspended. This is that written notification. The working group’s status has been in suspension since its last meeting in May. If the activities of the working group are suspended for at least six months, the working group will be disbanded and this section of the Edina Transportation Commission bylaws will be deleted, according to the bylaws. Senior Center Twelve attendees came to the Edina Senior Center on Saturday, July 18, for a 1.5hour training to become a “Dementia Friend.” Recreation Supervisor Donna Tilsner was the trainer with Jayne Claremont. This is part of the ACT on Alzheimer’s program to make Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: C.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Rebecca Foster, GIS Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, October 8, 2015 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive the approved minutes of Oct. 8, 2015, for the Energy & Environment Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, October 8, 2015 DRAFT MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday October 8, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:04 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call Glahn, Gubrud, Manser, Reinke, Satterlee, Seeley, Stefanik, Thompson and Zarrin. Late: Howard, Sierks, Chair Kostuch Staff Present: Ross Bintner, Charlie Gerk, MJ Lamon and Tim Barnes III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Zarrin and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. Member Sierks arrived at 7:06p.m. IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES A. Minutes. Member Gubrud commented that item VIII. D. of the September 10 minutes was actually an ad placed by staff, MJ Lamon. It was agreed to move the item to staff comments. Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. B. Attendance report and roster. No comments. C. Workgroup list and minutes. Member Seeley discussed adding Student Members Rienke and Transportation Student Member Emily Ding to the Education Outreach Working Group and adding Student Member Ding to the Recycling Solid Waste and Organics Working Group. Chair Kostuch arrived at 7:11p.m. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No Comments. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Board View / Novus Agenda Review (MJ Lamon) Ms. Lamon gave a presentation on Novus Agenda Review. She explained that current council packets can consume considerable amounts of staff time and paper (some packets exceeding 600 pages). Switching to Novus Agenda will eliminate the need for paper council packets and allow for ease of access to council members, commission members and our residents. She proceeded to demonstrate the software and answer questions. She reminded Members that any electronic annotations are considered public recorded and could be subject to data request. She also suggested any questions about the use of the software could be directed to her or Mr. Bintner. Member Howard arrived at 7:18p.m. A. ECCT Member Zarrin stated that there would be a Partners in Energy meeting 10/14/15. Member Zarrin started a discussion about what tools the city has available via CR-BPS software to help reach and understand the commission's goals. She stated that Member Sierks had complied a list of tools that city has for the baseline gathering and has sent to Ross Bintner to include in the tonight's package, Mr. Bintner will include with the next commission packet. Member Sierks continued Members Zarrin's discussion and has completed questions on how to measure the commissions 15% reduction goal. He suggested that along with B3 we should also be working with the Regional Indicator Project as they can show multiple levels of carbon footprints, from the government level down to the individual community levels. B. CR-BPS/City Building Update (Tim Barnes) Mr. Barnes gave an update on the tenKsolar panels. It was discovered that 15 panels were defective; the panels were covered under a materials warranty. The city was responsible for the labor to replace the panels, approximately $2,400. He then indicated that he will continue to work with tenKsolar to better understand the cause of the failures and report back to the commission at a later date. Mr. Barnes then proceeded to give a presentation and progress update on the CR-BPS system. He indicated that over the summer city staff has collected vast amounts of data to add to the system and will continue to focus on the B3 buildings first, followed by smaller park buildings. He indicated initial data entry could take another 6-8 months. He ended his presentation with that the CR-BPS system is an excellent investment for the city, that it will be a lot of work but well worth it in the end. Member Sierks asked about integration with street light data, Mr. Barnes indicated he would research the issue. Chair Kostuch asked how this data would augment over the B3 data. Mr. Barnes responded that the city would be able to compare their buildings to buildings across the state. He also stated that the system will better help track data to evaluate building systems and envelopes allowing for better asset management and purchasing decisions. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS. No comments. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. CSG conflict of interest discussion. Mr. Thompson briefly discussed his message to the Commissioners that was in the meeting packet about his error in recusing himself in the CSG vote B. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. No comments. C. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee. No comments. D. Education Outreach Working Group. Member Gubrud gave the following update 1. Edina day of service is coming up in October, potentially 3 or 4 new installs. 2. The Home Energy Squad had an ad in the Edina About Town, designed by the CEE. 3. There will be an open forum in April, Member Gubrud invited Mindy Ahler up who displayed a graphic and article about the true cost of carbon. The sub-committee will continue to discuss how to present this data to the public at the forum. 4. Council Member Kevin Staunton will be a guest speaker with Edina TEDx, he will be discussing community solar gardens. Member Howard presented a video trailer for the movie "The Burden" and requested that they be allowed to show it to a public gathering as part of the working group's goals. Motion made by Member Thompson and seconded by Member Zarrin to show the movie "The Burden" as part of the Education Outreach Working Groups goals to the public. Motion carried. Glahn opposed. Gubrud and Kostuch abstain. E. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee. No comments. F. Recycling, Solid Waste and Organics Working Group. Member Seeley stated that they will be meeting with representatives from St. Louis Park and Minneapolis to discuss their bans on Styrofoam food containers. Member Seeley stated that she had been working with staff to create a resolution for organic hauling. G. Student Subcommittee. Both Student Members are currently working on a plan to present to their principal about ways to make the new school building energy efficient. Chair Kostuch suggested that they include in their plan that energy efficiency should be given greater importance than the architecture of the structure. H. Water Quality Working Group. No comments. I. Community Solar. Member Sierks asked for staff to give an update in their staff comments section. Chair Kostuch gave a recap of the commissioner / council cross meeting and highlighted several topics that might be of interest to the commission. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. 2016 Workplan Mr. Bintner discussed the revised work plan template and has provided a copy in the commission packet. Mr. Bintner shared that he felt the council was receptive of their work plan and it should be approved by December 1. Member Sierks noted that work plan item 2A should be read as that work shall be completed within 5 years, not just the plan. B. Partners In Energy Kick off 10/14/15, Mr. Bintner and assistant finance director Kyle Sawyer will be in attendance. Manager Neal will help with the kick off as well. This will be a good opportunity to highlight the initiatives from the commission and where they have gone. C. Community Solar Our RFP received three proposals; review has not been completed but will be by 10/12 and hopefully will be set for next council meeting in October. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Kostuch declared the meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Motion made by Member Glahn and seconded by Member Gubrud to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Res full submitte Rebecc Foster GIS Administrator Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: C.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Arts and Culture Commission, August 27, 2015 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Please review the minutes from the August 27, 2015 meeting of the Arts & Culture Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, August 27, 2015 Edina Arts and Culture Commission Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Community Room August 27, 2015 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order Chair Meifert called the meeting to order at 4:35 p.m. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O’Dea, and Steve Suckow. Commissioners Absent: Cheryl Gunness and Daniel Li. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center Students Representatives Present: None. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Chair Meifert noted the meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. No additions to the agenda voiced. Motion by Commissioner La Valleur and seconded by Commissioner Miller that the Arts and Culture Commission approve the August 27, 2015 Agenda as presented. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O’Dea, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting of July 23, 2015 B. General Manager’s Report C. Music in Edina D. Public Art Edina Chair Meifert asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 23, 2015. No changes voiced. Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner O’Dea that the Arts and Culture Commission approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O’Dea, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. V. Community Comment No comments made. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Arts and Culture Commission Bylaws Commissioner Suckow provided an updated draft of the bylaws which he composed using the comments from the Commissioners that provided input and from discussion with Mr. Frey. He stated that the majority of changes were made to section seven on page six to accommodate the way in which the working groups have developed over time. He stated that under section nine the attempt was for the budget item to reflect more of a desire to provide oversight and not micromanage. Chair Meifert suggested language stating that all annual budgets must be approved in advance by the majority of the members to guarantee support. He stated that budgets should be what is planned but does not necessarily need to be what occurred. Commissioner O’Dea stated that the budgets should include some buckets of planned expenditures. Commissioner Suckow provided the example of the Music in Edina group showing events but not specific items within the events. Commissioner Ellis stated that the language appears that the budget would apply to the Commission and asked if the Commission has a budget. Mr. Frey explained that there is not a budget at this time for the Commission as a whole but noted that the Commission has oversight over the two working groups. Commissioner Suckow stated that each working group would also be required to have a treasurer. Mr. Frey noted that the Public Art working group has a treasurer and he works as the treasurer for the Music in Edina working group. He advised that he would soon transition out of the treasurer position for Music in Edina and could act as treasurer for the two newly created working groups while they are starting up. Chair Meifert asked if there would be a review of the duties. Commissioner Suckow stated that the duties were set by the City Council and therefore were not proposed to be changed. Chair Meifert suggested that an additional statement be added explaining that he felt that the Commission has been left out of some discussions in the past. Commissioner Suckow referenced Item E and noted that language could be strengthened and confirmed that Chair Meifert would send him the additional language by email. The Commission discussed the possibility of creating and keeping up to date a calendar of current events of importance to the Commission, which could be reviewed and updated quarterly. Motion by Commissioner Miller and seconded by Commissioner LaValleur that the Arts and Culture Commission approve the bylaws as amended, with the additional language to be added from Chair Meifert. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O’Dea, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. B. 2016 Work Plan – Preparation for September 16th Joint Work Session Chair Meifert stated that there will be a joint session on September 16th at 6:00 p.m. between the Commission and City Council to review the Commission’s 2016 Work Plan. Mr. Frey stated that the joint session is an opportunity for the Commission to meet with the City Council and asked that any Commissioners that are not able to attend should provide their input on the Work Plan before that time. Chair Meifert noted that while some events and items will remain on the Work Plan, those items should be updated to reflect the recent accomplishments and upcoming events. Mr. Frey referenced The Author’s Studio item which has had decreased attendance. He stated that former Art Center Board member Colin Nelson had thought about changing the event to the Edina Public Library through the Edina Community Foundation on a Sunday but the decision had been made to keep the event at the Art Center on a Saturday morning. He noted that some sessions had been canceled and there would be three events planned for the fall/winter and three events during the spring. He stated that perhaps something could be given to authors that attend and stated that any fundraising support would be welcomed. Commissioner O’Dea noted that sometimes a small fee increases attendance. Commissioner Miller stated that book stores offer that type of event for free. Mr. Frey stated that the event started with about 20 to 25 people attending and grew to around 40 people per event, noting that current attendance was closer to 12 people. Chair Meifert stated that perhaps the venue could be changed to mix things up. Commissioner O’Dea stated that if former attendees were known it would be interesting to poll those people to see why they are not attending anymore. Mr. Frey noted that a survey could be done through Survey Monkey through the emails provided by past attendees. Commissioner La Valleur stated that it would make more sense to skip the December offering and instead hold the event in January. Commissioner Lappin stated that she would prefer to see donations accepted rather than charging for the event. Chair Meifert referenced the art in public places item and asked that the item be updated with accomplishments from 2015 and bullet points of what should be done in 2016. He noted that he does have language for an Art on the Move item to add as well. Commissioner La Valleur stated that she would draft the language to incorporate for the art in public places item. Mr. Frey stated that he would need to have the draft Work Plan submitted by September 8th and would need all input before that time. Commissioner O’Dea stated that the items with budgets should be listed on the top of the initiatives. Chair Meifert asked if the Commission is going to ask for funds for the literature item to pay the stipends for authors. Mr. Frey stated that Colin Nelson suggested paying $100 for a stipend to the authors. Commissioner Ellis stated that the Commission could fundraise for those funds and if the $600 is not gained, the Commission could fund the item through a working group budget. She stated that perhaps the Commission should develop their Work Plan earlier in the year as at this point the Council is too far along in their budget process for the Commission to submit a budget request. It was the consensus of the Commission that the author stipend would be funded this year with $300 from the Music in Edina working group and $300 from the Public Art working group, with an attempt to fundraise as well. Chair Meifert stated that he would draft language that could possibly ask the Council for the $600 as well. It was the consensus of the Commission for the film item to be removed with language to explain why the item is not being continued. Commissioner Ellis suggested that language be included that states the Commission would like to possibly bring the film event back if there is an opportunity in the future to hold the event at a City owned space, such as Grandview. Commissioner O’Dea stated that she would draft that language. Mr. Frey reported that there will be a City Council work session on Tuesday, September 1st devoted to Grandview. Mr. Frey provided additional information on the dance item, noting that the instructor is leaving the Art Center as he is going back to college. He stated that the language could be updated to state that the group is exploring new options. He noted that the Park Board holds a six hour retreat each year to discuss and update their Work Plan. Commissioner La Valleur stated that the percentage for arts item could be removed as the Commission is not moving forward with that. Chair Meifert referenced the fundraising and donation item and stated that he would not be comfortable asking for funds with that generalized brochure. Commissioner Miller stated that the best method to move forward would be for the Commission to develop an insert that could detail information specific to the Commission and could be included inside the brochure. It was the consensus of the Commission that an insert should be developed that the Commission could use for fundraising in addition to the City brochure. Commissioner La Valleur stated that raffle tickets would be a great opportunity for fundraising as well. Chair Meifert noted that an online auction would be another option. Commissioner Ellis stated that the Ways and Means group could discuss further discussion those items. Chair Meifert referenced potential language for the Art Center and a new venue. Mr. Frey stated that the item may not be an option following the September 1st meeting. He acknowledged that the Art Center cannot add any additional programming without additional space. Chair Meifert provided language regarding the Art on the Move item. Commissioner Miller asked if the groups would be making a donation for the services. Commissioner O’Dea stated that is a detail the working group could determine but agreed that it would make sense for the group to make a donation to the Commission in return for the services. Chair Meifert stated that perhaps an additional initiative should be added regarding community theater and provided that proposed language for incorporation. He stated that a working group could be created for that item as well. Commissioner O’Dea stated that she recently send an email link to Mr. Frey for a survey to be distributed to the Commission members and noted that she will use that information to develop a communication plan for the Commission and art related events in Edina. Mr. Frey provided additional information on an intern position that will be gathering information on arts and culture events throughout Edina. Commissioner O’Dea explained that she is working from a more strategic position in regard to the best method for communicating that information. Chair Meifert briefly reviewed the items to be updated on the Work Plan and which member of the Commission and/or working group would be completing each action. He noted that the necessary information should be provided to Mr. Frey by September 1st. Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner La Valleur that the Art and Culture Commission approve the amendments to the 2016 Work Plan as proposed with additional incorporations to be made. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O’Dea, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Meifert asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Commissioner Comments Commissioner La Valleur provided an update on upcoming events and asked the Commissioners to complete a ballot for the sculpture contest. She noted that she attended an opening of a huge public art piece in Bloomington the previous week and had pictures for interested Commissioners to view. Mr. Frey stated that Bloomington received an endowment for the arts grant in the amount of $100,000, which was matched and provided the city with $200,000 for public art. Commissioner Ellis asked if the Commission could research grant opportunities as that could be much more successful than raising donations. She asked that the item be added to a future agenda to further discuss opportunities. She noted that she does have experience writing grant applications in the past. Mr. Frey confirmed that he does receive available grant information and can forward that information on to interested Commissioners. Commissioner La Valleur noted that she has also written grant applications, but stated that she did not receive the grant she applied for this past year. IX. Staff Comments No comments. X. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Chair Meifert that the Art and Culture Commission adjourn the meeting at 6:15 p.m. Ayes: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Kitty O’Dea, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: C.3. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, Engineering Specialist Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission, Oct. 22, 2015 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: Receive the approved Oct. 22, 2015, minutes from the Edina Transportation Commission. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: ETC, Oct. 22, 20115 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/19/2015 1 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Council Chambers October 22, 2015, 6:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Bass called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Bass, Ding, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Loeffelholz, Nelson, Olson, Ruehl, and Spanhake. Absent at roll call was member Boettge. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Spanhake approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Janovy approving the Sept. 17 minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations V.A. Metro Transit Green Line LRT Extension Presentation Mr. Dan Phieffer, assistant manager, public involvement, Metro Transit, shared that the Southwest LRT which is expected to begin operating in 2020, is an extension of the Green Line. The 14.5 mile line will have 15 stations with the Eden Prairie Town Center Station deferred due to cost. The closest station to Edina will be the Opus Station at Bren Road, west of TH-169. Stations will have park and ride and bus connections. A sector study will be done in 2018 to identify bus connection needs and Mr. Phieffer recommended that the ETC participate because this will directly impact Edina. He also recommended that the ETC contacted Hennepin County who is responsible for developing pedestrian and bike access at each station. Also in attendance with Mr. Phieffer was Mr. Nkongo Cigolo; Mr. Cigolo is the contact for Edina, Hopkins and St. Louis Park. VI. Community Comment – None. VII. Reports/Recommendations VII.A. 2016 Neighborhood Reconstruction Project Draft Engineering Studies City engineer Chad Millner presented the following draft engineering studies: Morningside A & Whites Oaks C Total roadway to be reconstructed is 1.0 mile, plus utility improvements. Mr. Millner said staff was surprised to learn from area residents that their biggest concerns were traffic issues and not wetland related. Because of this, staff is proposing several Living Streets traffic calming measures on specific streets, for example, a section of Sunnyside Road will be narrowed and bump-outs added; the intersections of Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/19/2015 2 Grimes Avenue and Curve Avenue at Sunnyside Road will be realigned and narrowed, and a marked crosswalk added at Grimes Avenue; bump-outs will be added on Grimes and Curve Avenues on certain sections; additionally, there are varied street widths and some will be narrowed or widened slightly. Mr. Millner said the proposed changes for Sunnyside Road are specifically meant to calm traffic and shift it to W. 44th Street which is the state aid road designed to carry the traffic that is currently on Sunnyside Road. Mr. Millner asked specifically for feedback regarding an access “road” off of Townes Circle. He explained that it is a private road with four properties that is being maintained by the City. It also has a utility easement that is signed by three of the property owners. Staff is proposing to upgrade the watermain, adding a fire hydrant and allow the property owners decide if the road remains private (City would stop maintenance) or turn it over to the City. Individual member’s feedback included the following: • Concerned about diverting traffic from one street to another; • Understands the need to control speeding but narrowing to 20 ft. and 21 ft. seemed very narrow; (Mr. Millner said the turning movement software shows that fire trucks and school buses will be able to navigate through but other vehicles at the intersection will need to allow them to get thru first; the design is for smaller vehicles); • Impacts will be to three neighborhoods with over 800 households, and two cities, and proposals made based on feedback from fewer than 100 households; • Solving a speeding problem that doesn’t exist because the 85th percentile speed on Sunnyside Road is 30.3 mph for a 30 mph road; volume seems to be the issue – has volume increased? (Mr. Millner did not know if volume increased); implementation should be based on threshold; • Threshold and engineering judgment are important; • Use the ‘donut’ concept to see how the broader community will be impacted. • Agreed with staff regarding Townes Circle access “road.” Also present with Mr. Millner were Mr. Andrew Scipioni, engineering technician and Mr. Toby Muse, from Short Elliott Hendrickson, the consultant working on this project. Golf Terrace B and Strachauer Park A Mr. Millner said both neighborhoods are similar – one is 2.7 miles, the other is 2.0 miles. Improvements will include utilities, new curb and gutter, sidewalks, one-sided parking only and intersection realignment in Strachauer Park. Mr. Millner answered questions related to residents’ feedback on one-sided parking (Strachauer residents are in favor and only few have commented from Golf Terrace); which side of street to place sidewalk (follow existing pattern or look for side with least impacts). VII.B. Traffic Safety Report of October 7, 2015 A.1. Planner Nolan explained that the distracted driver study was the traffic safety coordinator observing and documenting what drivers were doing. Chair Bass requested that this information be added to the appendix in the future. Regarding the vegetation, Planner Nolan said it is not an issue for drivers but could Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/19/2015 3 be for pedestrians so staff will evaluate further. He said based on feedback from other roundabouts in the cities of Minneapolis and Richfield, staff did not plan to move the crosswalk. A.2. This section will be revised to clarify that adding a centerline was the recommendation. B.1. Planner Nolan stated he was not aware of warrants for stop sign removal. Two improvement suggestions were made: 1) consider moving stop sign to the other side of the street – difficult to see because of tree; 2) good location for a traffic calming circle. C.1. It was noted that this was an example of why observational data is important because pedestrians will cross wherever it is most convenient for them. Planner Nolan clarified that the Grandview Study will begin immediately and some implementations will be short term and others long term. C.2. Planner Nolan said staff was reviewing a school speed zone study that was done previously. Change ‘Antrim’ to ‘St. Patrick’s.’ D.5. Change ‘state statute’ to ‘city code.’ Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member LaForce to forward the amended Oct. 7, 2015, TSC report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. VII.C. Results of 2015 Open Streets on 50th Event Planner Nolan said the event was very successful with approximately 9,000 attendees. He said there were lessons learned that they will improve upon for next year’s event. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions VIII.A. Board and Commission Communication with City Council Regarding the memo from Manager Neal clarifying purpose and expectation of advisory boards and commissions submitting an Advisory Communication to City Council, the consensus was that the ETC started this process to communicate their opinions when they differed from staff and it is a useful tool for them to share their feedback with Council. If it is linked to their work plan and the minutes insufficiently reflect their feedback, they should be able to include an advisory communication with staff’s report clearly stating their view. Furthermore, the ETC does not use advisory communication to communicate new initiatives; it is generally work plan related, and, communicating at an annual meeting with Council is not enough. IX. Chair and Member Comments IX.A. Discussion: Review and Recommend Modifications to Traffic Safety Request Process After discussion, chair Bass motioned to form a committee to review the Traffic Safety Committee process and their responsibility will be to evaluate and recommend improvement to the process that align with multimodal and Living Streets policy. Committee members are Bass, Janovy and Loeffelholz and they will submit their recommendation in November. The motion was seconded by member Loeffelholz. All voted aye. Motion carried. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/19/2015 4 IX.B Guiding Principles for Transportation Studies Chair Bass said the City Council had positive feedback for the ETC’s work plan and they asked that the ETC include Guiding Principles for Transportation Studies into the work plan which will be tied in with information requested from developers. Chair Bass said she will be attending the City’s first annual all-chair meeting on Oct. 26. Chair Bass said that MNDOT is updating two of their transportation plans and is seeking feedback from the public on Nov. 6; she suggested having someone from the ETC attend. Member Nelson said the City of Bloomington recently publicly stated their opposition to improving the bridge that would result in more freight train traffic on the Dan Patch rail line and asked if staff could report on this next month. Planner Nolan said he’s aware of a study the City of Savage is doing to evaluate improving a swing bridge that would allow TH-100 to continue through Bloomington and into Savage and Bloomington has stated their opposition because this would run through residential neighborhoods. Chair Bass suggested waiting for the conclusion of the study to see if there is any connection to the Dan Patch rail line. Member Spanhake invited commissioners to a workshop on Nov. 9, titled ‘Man vs Machine or Man Plus Machine,’ and informed them of a survey that MNDOT is conducting seeking feedback on what makes your community walkable and features to improve walking experience for developing their statewide pedestrian system plan. Member Janovy reminded residents not to blow their leaves into the streets. X. Staff Comments • The 2015 projects are either complete or, are nearing completion; the W. 54th Street bridge will open in 2-3 weeks. • The Grandview Transportation Study was approved by City Council on Oct. 20; the consulting company will present to the ETC in November. • Preparation work is underway for the sidewalk on Oaklawn Avenue at W. 72nd Street to the cul- de-sac – staff is reaching out to four property owners for an easement and will be applying for grant funding. • City of Eden Prairie has a circulator that is doing very well and staff met recently with the operator and invited them to give a presentation to the ETC in November or December. • In 2015, 2 miles of sidewalk were added to public works’ snow plowing responsibility; 2 miles will be added in 2016 and 1.25 miles in 2017. XI. Adjournment at 8:31p.m. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/19/2015 5 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J* J A S O N D SM WS # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 NAME TERM (Enter Date) 6/17 Bass, Katherine 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% Boettge, Emily 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% Ding, Emily 1 1 2 100% Iyer, Surya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% Loeffelholz, Ralf 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 78% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 100% Olson, Larry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 100% Spanhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 91% Ruehl, Lindsey 1 1 2 100% Rummel, Anna 9/1/2015 1 1 1 3 27% Campbell, Jack 9/1/2015 1 1 1 1 4 36% *cancelled Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: C.4. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Support Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Planning Commission, October 28, 2015 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: See attached approved minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting, October 28, 2015. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Minutes, October 28, 2015 Page 1 of 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS OCTOBER 28, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Acting Chair Carr called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Lee, Strauss, Thorsen, Ma, Kivimaki, Nemerov, Forrest, Carr, Absent from roll: Platteter, Hobbs and Olsen III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of the October 28, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of the October 14, 2015, Planning Commission meeting minutes. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. PUBLIC HEARING A. Variance. Pat Hennessy. 5827 Bernard Place, Edina MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker presented her staff report recommending variance approval subject to the following findings: a) The practical difficult is caused by the location of the homes to the north. b) The encroachment into the setback continues a setback pattern and will not affect neighboring properties or the street scape. Page 2 of 3 c) The request is reasonable given the location of the existing home and existing floor plan. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following condition. 1. The home must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped September 28, 2015. Appearing for the Applicant Pat and Jennifer Hennessy Applicant Presentation Mr. Hennessy addressed the Commission noting the house was constructed in 1939 with a very small kitchen which is in need of enlargement. Hennessy asked the Commission for their support. Discussion A brief discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that the variance is justified and is a minimal approach to gain more living space. Public Hearing Acting Chair Car opened the public hearing. No one was present to speak to the issue. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Motion Commissioner Nemerov moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT Acting Chair Carr asked if anyone was in the audience that would like to speak; being none; Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public comment period. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public comment carried. Page 3 of 3 VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS None VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Acting Chair Carr acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR AND MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Thorsen informed Commissioners the Grandview Transportation Committee will hold a public meeting on Monday, November 2, 2015 at City Hall in the Mayors Conference Room. Thorsen said all are welcome to attend. Acting Chair Carr apprised the Commission on the work of the Greater Southdale Area Work Group and their continued weekly meetings. Carr said at this time the group is discussing each of the four quadrants identified as the Greater Southdale Area. X. STAFF COMMENTS None. XI. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Thorsen moved adjournment at 7:30 p.m. Commission Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. ___________________________________________ Respectfully submitted Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: C.5. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission October 27, 2015 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Review HRRC meeting minutes from their October 27, 2015 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission, October 27, 2015 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/17/2015 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights and Relations Commission City Hall, Community Room October 27, 2015 at 7:00pm I. Call To Order Chair Arseneault called the October 27th, 2015 Human Rights and Relations Commission meeting to order at 7:02 PM. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Arseneault, Commissioners Burza, Kennedy, Rinn, Seidman, Tian, Vecchio-Smith, Winnick, and Student Commissioners Kearney and Ramesh. Staff present: HRRC Staff Liaison MJ Lamon and City Management Fellow Devin Massopust. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Seidman to approve the October 27, 2015 Human Rights and Relations Commission meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Kennedy. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Kennedy to approve the September 29, 2015 minutes. Motion seconded by Winnick. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. FBI Special Agent Timothy Wittman FBI Special Agent Timothy Wittman gave a presentation about the work of the FBI’s Civil Rights Program. VI. Community Comment None. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2015 Work Plan Updates 1. Community Outreach Commissioner Burza shared that the Community Conversations listening sessions were completed earlier this month, and they were a success, with about 65-75 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/17/2015 attendees overall. Both Student Commissioners Kearney and Ramesh participated in the listening sessions as group facilitators / note takers. It is anticipated the working group will report to the commission in November. 2. Human Rights City Designation Commissioner Kennedy advised that efforts to schedule presentations for the Human Rights City Designation are ongoing. 3. Affordable Housing Commissioner Winnick updated the Commission on the Edina City Council’s recent approval of an affordable housing policy that will go into effect on November 1, 2015. 4. ADA Event Proposal Commissioner Vecchio-Smith shared her draft blog post and noted she will work with Commissioner Tian on the post. 5. Website Update Commissioner Tian reported that our webpage has been updated as per the commission’s final instructions and that he will work with Commissioner Seidman on posting photos and videos of past HRRC events. B. Letter of Support: Make MN Capitol Art More Welcoming Chair Arseneault recapped the Minnesota Healing Stories Capitol Art initiative and presented for HRRC review a letter of support drafted by the Eden Prairie Human Rights Commission for joint submission by cities’ Human Rights Commissions. Motion by Kennedy to approve the Letter of Support. Motion seconded by Vecchio-Smith. Motion carried. C. Tom Oye Award Commissioner Rinn presented the changes to the Tom Oye Award on the HRRC website and noted that advertising the award can begin. D. Joint Work Session Plan The HRRC will have a joint work session with City Council on Tuesday, November 17. Chair Arseneault reminded the group that the work session is to provide a progress Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/17/2015 report on the current work plan. Chair Arseneault will prepare the agenda outline for the work session based on the commission’s discussion and preferences. E. Edina Community Council HRRC Representative Commissioner Winnick is stepping down from his seat as HRRC Representative of the Edina Community Council. Commissioner Kennedy volunteered to take his place. The recommended appointment will go to council for approval at their November 17 meeting. Motion by Kennedy to be Commissioner Winnick’s replacement as the HRRC Representative on the Edina Community Council. Motion seconded by Rinn. Motion carried. VIII. Correspondence and Petitions None. IX. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioner Kennedy advised the commission of the upcoming meeting of the League of Minnesota Cities Human Rights Commissions on November 7th. • Commissioner Ramesh thanked all those involved with the Community Conversations events. • Commissioner Rinn updated the Commission on the current status of Human Services funding. • Chair Arseneault shared that the Bias Offense Response team convened on October 22 about a graffiti incident in Pamela Park; that she attended an Arts and Culture Commission meeting to provide information about the Capitol Arts Project as per the suggestion of the HRRC, and that she participated in the Edina Boards and Commissions Chairs meeting and the Boards and Commissions Work Session with City Council on draft 2016 work plans, noting that both the Chairs meeting and the work session offered an opportunity to explore options for boards and commissions to work jointly on future projects. X. Staff Comments None. XI. Calendar of Events Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/17/2015 XII. Adjournment Motion by Seidman to adjourn the October 27th HRRC meeting at 9:43 PM. Motion seconded by Kennedy. Motion carried. Date: December 1, 2015 Agenda Item #: XIII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Meetings, Events & Dates As Of December 1, 2015 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Schedule of Events as of December 1, 2015 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF DECEMBER 1, 2105 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues Dec 1 Work Session – Finalize 2016 Work Plans/2016-2017 Budget 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Dec 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sat Dec 5 Town Hall Meeting 10:00 A.M. PAMELA PARK SHELTER Tues Dec 8 Special Meeting – Public Improvement Hearing 2016 Construction Projects 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 15 Work Session – Southdale Working Group 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session – Heritage Preservation Board 6:0 P.M. Tues Dec 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Fri Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OSBERVED – City Hall Closed Fri Jan 1 NEW YEAR’S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Jan 5 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jan 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jan 18 REV. DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.,DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Jan 19 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jan 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Feb 2 Work Session – Mill Pond Assessment Review/Engineering Assessment Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Feb 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Feb 15 PRESIDENTS’ DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Feb 16 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Feb 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Mar 1 Precinct Caucus Night Wed Mar 2 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Mar 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Wed Mar 15 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Mar 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS