HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-09-19 Draft PacketENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION
DRAFT AGENDA FOR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 19, 2007, 7:00 PM — 9:00 PM
1) Welcome & Call to Order
2) Discussion and Approval of Agenda
3) Discussion and Approval of July and August Meeting Minutes
4) Committee Chair Discussion
Education and Outreach
Climate Change
Recycling (Chair already approved)
5) Commission Workplan Discussion )
(Review committee workplans, prepare for meeting with City Council in
October)
6) Other business & Comp Plan Update
7) Public Comment
A,
Robert E. McKlveen o ��
5261 Lochloy Dr. W CP
Edina, MN 55436�G�
Phone: 952-924-9048
Email: bobmckiveen(cb-mac.com
September 14, 2007
Mr. James Hovland, Mayor
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Hovland,
am writing to share with you an idea for improving Edina's environment. First, though, I want to
thank you for your leadership on environmental issues and greenhouse gas reduction here in
Edina.
My idea pertains to refuse service in the City. Today is Friday morning in the Highlands
neighborhood, complete with its'noisy, smoky parade of garbage trucks. As you know, Edina
residents contract privately with refuse haulers, and are free to choose whatever company they
prefer. The unfortunate result of this freedom is the presence of at least four different refuse
companies collecting garbage in our City.
If the City were to restrict refuse service to one company, numerous environmental benefits could
be achieved. Namely, compared to having four haulers on our streets, using one company would
result in:
• Approximately 25,000 fewer miles driven on our streets per year by heavy diesel trucks,
with carbon dioxide exhaust reduced by several tons, as well as reduced particulate and
other pollutants
• Less wear -and -tear on our streets
• Less noise pollution
• Potentially better service and pricing
I recognize that "restricting commerce" to just one hauler would be met with resistance, yet it is
within the City's power to do so. The City can put out a request -for -proposal to all garbage
haulers seeking bids for the business throughout the City. In order to make such a restriction
more palatable, the RFP could be both creative and demanding, including such things as:
• Competitive pricing
• Service expectations and customer service requirements
• "Clean, Quiet" trucks
• Incentives for disposal close to the metro area, to decrease long-distance hauling
• Incentives for waste reduction
I recognize that this may not be a new idea, and that this plan would clearly take some time and
effort to implement, but I think that the benefits would be substantial. I welcome your thoughts.
Sincerely,
Bob McKlveen
September 14, 2007
Mayor James Hovland.
City of Edina
4801 W 50th St
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Hovland:
The Minnesota Environmental Initiative (MEI) invites you or a designee from your community or
organization to participate in a focus group to explore identify issues, opinions, and perceptions
about existing regulations and policy governing land use and water. Input is being solicited from
local government elected officials, local government staff, as well as builders and developers.
Information about the focus group being held in your region is below:
Protecting Land and Water Resources in Minnesota's Growing Communities
Thursday, October 11, 2007
7:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m.
Chanhassen Recreation Center Conference Room �o,vtTY
2310 Coulter Boulevard
Chanhassen, MN 55317 7 2007
*Light refreshments will be provided �� �GEtvED
The Minnesota Environmental Initiative (MEI) in partnership with the Minnesota Depar `- 6 it
Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil
Resources, and the Metropolitan Council has undertaken a project designed to improve the
coordination of water quality and land use policies, as they relate to growth pressures in the seven -
county metropolitan area and surrounding counties.
These focus groups are an opportunity for local government staff, local elected officials, and builders
and developers to provide input to the state agencies on implementation of land and water policies
at the local level. MEI seeks to obtain input from each of these sectors and strives to have a mix of
local elected officials, local government staff and builders and developers in each focus group, which
will be composed of ten to twelve individuals. If you are unable to attend, please send representative
from your same sector. Focus groups will include discussions on the successes and challenges in
conserving natural resources, organizational effectiveness, and agency coordination. We hope you
can participate!
MEI was founded as a private, nonprofit organization in 1991. For nearly 15 years, MEI's greatest
asset has been its capacity to engender trust among a wide spectrum of stakeholders who might
otherwise have difficulty engaging in productive dialogue. Over the years, MEI's role has evolved.
from simply convening dialogue to playing a key role in the development and management of
partnerships that evolve into environmental action and meaningful outcomes.
To participate, please contact Emily Franklin at 612-334-3388 Ext. 114 or efranklin@mn-ei.or9 by
Monday, October 1st.
-over-
l'-;;,r.�. ,s 10C)--�._,-.n;m;n2errc,_11,-i a'CnW: ;ir epr:
If you are unable to attend the session in your region, we will also be hosting focus groups in the
following communities:
Tuesday, October 9, 2007 - City of Hugo Rice Lake Center, Hugo
Wednesday, October 10, 2007 Rosemount Community Center, Rosemount
Tuesday, October 16, 2007 Bunker Hills Regional Park, Andover
Wednesday, October 17, 2007 - City of Rogers - Community Meeting Room, Rogers
Sincerely,
oLt&t Alu�
Shelley Shre$ler
Director of Environmental Projects
P. S. If you are unable to participate, please send a designee from your community or organization
who falls into your stakeholder group (i.e. local elected official, local government staff member, or
builder and developer).
Directions to the Chanhassen Recreation Center
From Minnesota Highway 5 West
• Take Minnesota Highway 5 West to Galpin Boulevard/County Road 19 South
• Take a left at Galpin Boulevard/County Road 19 South
• Turn left on Coulter Boulevard
• Parking is available adjacent to the recreation center
From Minnesota Highway 5 East
• Take Minnesota Highway 5 East to Galpin BoulevardJCounty Road 19 South
• Take a right at Galpin Boulevard/County Road 19 South
• Turn right on Coulter Boulevard
• Parking is available adjacent to the recreation center.
Ja�SED STgr�S
D � w
o
e
�F�rq( PROSEG�O?
Dear Mayor:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
September 12, 2007
THE ADMINISTRATOR
The 8"' annual ENERGY STAR® Change a Light, Change the World Campaign kicks
off this year on October 3, 2007, with Change a Light Day. The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and its partners, the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, are encouraging participation in this campaign. I invite Mayors from
across the country to help encourage every American to change at least one inefficient light in
their home to one that has earned the ENERGY STAR label.
Since the 2005 Campaign launched with an online pledge inviting people to commit to
change at least one light at home, more than 850,000 Americans have pledged to change nearly
2 million lights, and this number is growing daily.
Lights replaced with energy-efficient ones can add up in energy, monetary, and
environmental savings. ENERGY STAR -qualified light bulbs and fixtures use 75 percent less
energy than standard incandescent bulbs and can last up to 10 times longer. Just one ENERGY
STAR -qualified light bulb can save about $30 or more in energy costs over its lifetime, while
preventing more than 400 pounds of greenhouse gas emissions.
As a leader of your community, you have many ways to participate, including issuing a
proclamation, hosting a lighting change -out event, inviting your residents to take the pledge from
a link on your Web site, and much more.
A toolkit on this initiative is available at www. energystar.gov/joinCAL. Click on
Support as a Government Leader to access the toolkit, which includes ideas for your
participation and turnkey media and promotional materials.
Together, we can help light the way to greater energy efficiency and a brighter future. If
you have any questions, please have your staff contact Ms. Wendy Reed, at (202) 343-9122 or
reed.wendy@epa.gov, or former Mayor Randy Kelly, at (202) 564-3126 or
kelly.randy@,epa.gov.
Aephen
LU
�
Johns n
Intemet Address (URL) • http:llwww,epa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable -Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 50% Postconsumer content)
Top 4fi ene s
of high-performance buildings
New study quantifies energy efficiency benefits of green buildings in Minnesota.
The impact of buildings on our lives is dramatic, yet it goes
largely unnoticed. Buildings use a lot of resources and create
many adverse environmental effects.
Consume almost 2/3 oftotal electricity
Much of the impact of buildings is related to energy use. Use 12% of total potable water
of
High-performance buildings are designed to achieve significant Generate 2.n andlbs.demobrson io
construction and demolition waste
energy conservation. They use at least 30 percent less energy every day
each year than buildings designed only to meet the base Contribute 30% of total greenhouse
requirements of Minnesota Energy Code. High performance gas emissions
buildings that also integrate sustainable site design, indoor
environmental quality, and resource conservation are considered "green" buildings.
A recent Minnesota study quantifies the benefits of 41 high performance commercial buildings
in the state. The study compares their high-performance design to the same (hypothetical)
buildings designed to meet minimum requirements of the Minnesota Energy Code. The study
quantifies the extent to which the 41 high performance buildings are both saving energy dollars
that otherwise would leave the state economy, and preventing pollution that otherwise would
contaminate our air and water.
Many of these 41 high-performance buildings were not designed specifically to be "green"
buildings. Nonetheless, they incorporate an integrated design approach that is characteristic
OFFICE
of green buildings. Their design coordinates high -efficiency
BUILDINGTYPES
equipment with the building shell, orientation, insulation,
included in the study
ventilation, zoning and more, to create a high performance built
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
environment. All the benefits of high-performance buildings are
MIDDLE/HIGH SCHOOL
very likely to be benefits of green buildings as well. These benefits
RETAIL
can be used as proxy measures of the minimum benefits likely to
LIBRARY
result from green buildings.
OFFICE
The Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance contracted with
COLLEGE CLASSROOM
COLLEGE LAB
The Weidt Group in April 2005 to perform this study. It includes
MIXED USE
a broad spectrum of commercial building types.The benefits
HOSPITAL
identified by the study are substantial.
RECREATION CENTER
POLICE/FIRE STATION
LABORATORY
Read the study: High Performance Building Design in Minnesota
www.pca.state.mn.us/pca/greenbuilding/cost.cfm
Hassan Elementary
School
Completed in August 2005, this school
in Rogers, Minn., is a recent addition
to Elk River Schools' portfolio of
buildings designed with sustainability
in mind. The two-story design is
resource efficient, while the traditional
peak -roofed style fits in with the
surrounding community and provides
a more home -like feel. Classrooms
are grouped along east -west corridors
on either side of the open court to
provide optimal daylight from both
the north and south. Performance
features include dimming T5 lights,
desiccant energy recovery, high -
efficiency boilers, and displacement
ventilation. Designed to be 51% more
energy efficient than required by
Minnesota energy code,the building
is projected to save more than
$64,000 a year (based on 2004 energy
costs). The building was designed by
KKE Architects, Inc.; mechanical and
electrical systems were designed by
Johnson Controls.
(��-t _ f '4.
tt �
Less energy
use means less pollution going in to
the air we breathe: sulfur dioxide,
nitrous oxides, and particulates.
An important benefit of green buildings is that
their lower energy use results in less of the air
pollution linked to asthma and heart disease.
The results for the 41 high performance
commercial buildings included in the study
are dramatic. Each year these buildings
prevent additional air pollution (rounded to
the nearest 100)
totaling: 205,900 lbs.
According to the sulfur dioxide (SO)
American Heart 229,300 lbs.
Association; 'During nitrous oxides (NOx)
the last decade... 15,300 lbs.
epidemiological particulates
studies conducted
worldwide have shown a consistent increased
risk for heart and blood vessel problems, including
heart and stroke deaths, in relation to exposure
to present-day pollution, especially particulate
matter."
Pollution prevented by these 41 green
buildings compared to car emissions.
Prevented SO2 = 445,700 fewer cars
Prevented NOx = 59,900 fewer cars
Prevented particulates = 15,800
fewer cars
Prevented CO2 = 12,200 fewer cars
7_4-
2. �_.
Less energy use means less mercury
released into the atmosphere to
contaminate fish, ultimately harming
humans and wildlife.
Another benefit of green buildings is that
less mercury is released to the atmosphere.
Atmospheric mercury mixes with rain and snow,
and then falls into lakes and waterways. In the
water, mercury undergoes chemical changes to
contaminate the food chain. It builds up in the
tissue of fish, and in the tissue of wildlife and
humans who eat the fish.
The 41 high-performance commercial buildings
in this study prevent a total of about 880 grams
(1.93 lbs) of mercury from being released
to the atmosphere in Minnesota each year.
This compares with about 1 gram of mercury
typically entering a 20 -acre lake each year. Even
this small amount in lake water contaminates
fish. For example, an adult walleye can have a
mercury concentration 150,000 times as high
as the water surrounding it. Fish consumption
advisories are issued
because mercury is a nerve
toxin that impairs human
ability to see, hear, walk
and talk. I]
Z r'
Less energy
use means less I
carbon dioxide,
a heat -trapping
gas with global+
warming potential,
released to the atmosphere.
Green buildings have an important role to
play in limiting emissions of greenhouse
gases to combat the prospects of global
warming. The 41 high-performance
commercial buildings in this study prevent
a total of more than 119.8 million pounds
(59,900 tons) of carbon dioxide (CO2) being
released into the atmosphere each year.
This is the equivalent of removing more
than 12,200 cars from Minnesota roads.
Fairview Red Wing Medical Center
Opened in December 2001, Fairview Red Wing Medical
Center combines a clinic and 50 -bed inpatient hospital in
one high-performance facility. The site was selected for its
views overlooking the Mississippi River. State-of-the-art HVAC
equipment was selected with the intention of cutting costs
through energy efficiency rather than staff reductions. High -
efficiency equipment choices included chillers and cooling
towers instead of DX refrigerant systems, indoor penthouses
to house HVAC systems instead of rooftop package systems,VFDs on all HVAC motors,
setback controls for occupancy levels, centralized high-pressure boilers for sterilization and
humidification instead of electric resistance units, low -e glass, and a more efficient insulation
package. Maintenance staff keeps these systems well -tuned, while also providing security
services for the facility. Grumman/Butkus Associates' annual energy study ranked Fairview Red
Wing Medical Center's energy usage in the lower 25th quartile among 107 hospitals included
in the Midwest. The building was designed by Setter Leach & Lindstrom, Inc. (now Leo A Daly
Company), with energy design assistance by The Weidt Group.
;
Less energy use means big energy cost
savings to building owners and tenants.
A major benefit of green buildings is the
significant savings in annual energy costs that
accrue over the lifetime of each building. The
combined savings in annual energy costs for
the 41 high-performance commercial buildings
in this study total almost $6.25 million, based on
2005 energy prices. This translates to savings of
$0.87 per square foot each year.
Crosswinds Arts and Science
Middle School
Completed in November 2001, Crosswinds
Middle School in Woodbury is operated
by the East Metro Integration District.
The building was designed as a dense
aggregation of structures to maintain the
flow of the wetland across the site. Native
perennial plants and grasses, combined
with limited use of lawn grass, minimize site
maintenance. Brick and metal panels provide
a durable, low -maintenance building exterior.
A curved metal roof creates clerestory lighting
and allows daylight to fall within the central
area of each of the six focused instructional
"homebase" units. High-performance features
include a high -efficiency boiler, passive
desiccant energy -recovery units, premium -
efficiency pump motors, VAVs, daylight
sensors, and operable windows for passive
cooling and fresh air. The building was
designed by Cuningham Group Architecture,
P.A. Mechanical engineering was provided
by Wentz Associates, electrical engineering
by Kaeding & Associates, and energy design
assistance by The Weidt Group.
I �
Paybacks for high-performance
features average less than 3 years.
Designing commercial buildings to be high
performing pays for itself in a very short time,
and then the savings continue each year for
the life of the building. The Minnesota study
confirms that paybacks are very short for high
performance integrated energy design features.
For each building type evaluated in the study,
the mean and median simple paybacks were
less than 3 years. Of the 16 buildings for which
payback data was available, only two buildings
exceeded 3 years. Nine of the 16 buildings
ranged around a one-year payback.
Simple payback
for high-performance buildings
Buil' median
Libraries 2.1 yrs.
2.1 yrs.
Middle/High Schools 2.6 yrs.
2.1 yrs.
Offices 2.0 yrs.
2.3 yrs.
Retail 1.6 yrs.
1.6 yrs.
`with payback data for more than one building
Incremental first costs averaged $1.18 per
square foot for the 16 buildings that had
first cost data available. Ten buildings kept
incremental first costs under a dollar per square
foot, while still achieving annual energy cost
savings of more than 30 percent.
J oil
ti d
ux i; Ir 77 i r r ■a
Less energy use keeps those savings
in Minnesota to support the local
economy.
A little -recognized impact of green building is
its benefit to the local economy. Money spent
on energy generated from fuels imported to
Minnesota leaves the state and is a net drain
on the local economy. The energy-efficient
design of green buildings frees up annual
energy savings for investment in Minnesota.
The median energy cost savings for the 14
high-performance elementary/middle/high
schools included in the study is more than
$58,000 annually, based on 2005 energy
prices. These are saving that can be spent on
classroom instruction every year. For the five
high performance retail buildings in the study,
the median annual energy cost savings is more
than $162,000. These savings go directly to the
bottom line, increasing profitability that helps
fuel business expansion and job growth.
Ar f1 1r,
Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. (KFI")
KFI reused the shell of a former grocery store to create their engineering firm's
headquarters. Benefits included ease of winter construction and up -front shell
cost savings of $40/square foot. KFI replaced much of the parking lot with natural
prairie grasses, wildflowers, and a raingarden—increasing green space on the
3.6 -acre lot by 54%. KFI piloted the LEED-Existing Buildings rating system and is
the first LEED-EB certified building in Minnesota to receive a gold rating.
Many different technologies are demonstrated in the facility, A, closed-loop,
ground -source heat pump system heats and cools the building. Displacement
ventilation in the open office areas enhances the indoor air quality and reduces
fan energy. Radiant ceiling panels in bathrooms transfer the heat directly to
surfaces. Infrared heating is used in the high bay areas to heat the large thermal
mass of the building. A passive desiccant energy recovery wheel captures waste
heat from the building exhaust airstream and controls humidity. The building
transformation used an integrated sustainable design process with KF1
(mechanical & electrical design), Pope Associates (architectural design),
McGough (general contractor), and The Weidt Group (Xcel Energy -energy
design assistance modeling).
MGH PERFORMANCE BUILDINGS: KE:' EIVERGY :5A'wflhiGS �)TRATEGiES
Average %Savings Breakdown
CategoriesOffice Retail Schools
Improved insulation 2% 1 % 2% Commercial buildings have high internal load requirements, reducing the energy required for heating.
levels Improved insulation levels save less than residential projects and are not as cost effective.
Improved window
4%
1 %
4%
Similar comment as above. Retail savings opportunities are less due to low glass area -to -floor area ratios.
glazing
Calibrated daylight
12%
12%
3%
Daylighting is a high-performance strategy that has not reached market saturation.The future of
controls
improved savings for this category is high, once various market barriers are reduced including design and
construction trade familiarity, and control technology improvements. (Vaidya et. al. 2005)
Lighting controls
8%
7%
15%
Due to the diverse operation of space occupancy and lighting design levels, school buildings have higher
opportunities to reduce lighting energy consumption using occupancy sensors and dual -level lighting
controls, as compared to offices and retail building types.
Improved lighting
15%
33%
9%
High savings for retail in this category is the result of the type of retail projects in the sample set. Large
design
"big box' retail buildings can easily meet the requirements of the current energy code, due to lower
industry standard light level requirements.
Improved heating
3%
2%
4%
Based on energy costs, natural gas rates as compared to electric rates per unit of site energy have been
efficiency
much lower over the sample period reviewed, providing less opportunities for large dollar savings.
Technology improvements in high efficiency gas equipment range from 5 to 10% better than the code.
Improved cooling
14%
3%
6%
Improved cooling efficiencies are greatest for offices since they operate through out the summer months
efficiency
as compared to school buildings.
Load responsive
35%
11%
15%
Use of variable -frequency drives on air -handler systems is significant. In the future,for many buildings, this
HVAC design '
will be a code requirement.
Conditioning of
7%
21%
41%
New school IAQ criteria require high ventilation loads providing larger opportunities for energy recovery
outside air
strategies as compared to office and retail building types.
Refrigeration 0% 11% 0% Retail with refrigerated case work provides many opportunities for improved savings.
For more detailed information on these strategies, seethe study High Performance Building Design in Minnesota. Visit www.pca.state.mn.us/greenbuilding/cost.cfm.
High-performance buildings featured in this study (portialiist*)
Dittmann Center Nellie Stone Johnson Eagan Community Center Crosswinds Arts and Science
1520 St. Olaf Ave. Community School 1501 Central Parkway Middle School
Northfield, MN 55057 807 27th Ave. N. Eagan, MN 55121 600 Weir Drive
Winona State Science Bldg. Minneapolis, MN 55411 College of St. Catherine Woodbury, MN 55125
400 Winona St. Monticello High School St. Paul Library Arlington High School
Winona, MN 55987 5225 School Blvd. 2004 Randolph Ave. 1495 Rice St.
Burroughs Community School Monticello, MN 55362 St. Paul MN 55105 St. Paul, MN 55117
1601 West 50th St. Hopkins West Junior High School Fairview Red Wing Crossroads Elementary
Minneapolis, MN 55419 3830 Baker Road Medical Center 543 Front St.
Minnetonka, MN 55305 701 Fairview Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55117
WMEP Interdistrict Downtown
PO Box 95
School Karges-FauIcon bridge, Inc. Lakeview School
Red Wing, MN 55066
10 South 10th St. 670 W. County Road B 875 Barstad Road
t(
Minneapolis, MN 55403 St. Paul, MN 55113-4527 Hassan Elementary School Cottonwood, MN 56229 t
14055 Orchid Ave. ¢a*
Jordan Park Community School General Mills JFB Technical Center Rogers, MN 55374 r
1501- 30th Ave. N. 9000 Plymouth Ave. N.
Minneapolis, MN 55411 Golden Valley, MN 55427 Providence Academy
15100 Schmidt Lake Road
*This list is based on owners who gave permission to be identified in the study. Plymouth, MN 55442
Notes
1.The Weidt Group analyzed data from buildings that received Xcel/NSP Energy Design Assistance (provided free to buildings 50,000 sq.ft. or more in the early design phase).The building
performance data is based on a subset of over 170 building projects The Weidt Group had modeled from 1994 to 2005.The study results reflect only buildings designed to perform at least 30
percent better than Minnesota energy code, that participated in the Xcel/NSP program, and whose data could be verified. There are other high-performance buildings in Minnesota that were not
included in the study because they reside outside Xcel Energy's service territory. The modeling was based on energy simulations using DOE2.1 E and incorporating the local DOE -2 TMY weather
file.The conversion of pollution savings from gas and electric energy generation was based on the current Xcel Energy aggregate generation blend of air emission for each pollutant source. The
conversion to energy cost savings was based on the design year of each building. The Weidt Group subsequently provided multipliers (for gas savings, and an average virtual rate for electric
savings that accounts for demand electric) to convert all energy cost savings amounts to reflect 2005 energy prices.
2.2005 average annual emissions for a light duty passenger vehicle: 0.462 Ibs S02,3.83 lbs. NOx, 0.971 lbs. particulates, and 4.9 tons CO2.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Contact Laura Millberg for more information
._ 520 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4294 on green and high wperformance building:
www.pca.state.mn.us/greenbuilding • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 651-215-0219 • laura.millberg@state.mn.us