HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 09-01 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes RegularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE EDINA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
HELD ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1994
5:30 P.M., MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Dave Runyan, Rose Mary Utne, Len Olson, Robert
Hale
MEMBERS ABSENT: Chuck Ingwalson
STAFF PRESENT: Kris Aaker, Jackie Hoogenakker
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Mr. Hale moved approval of the July 7, 1994, meeting minutes. Mrs. Utne
seconded the motion, with corrections. All voted aye; motion carried.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
B-94-42 Leny and Margaret Wallenfriedman
6805 Limerick Lane
Lot 6, Block 9, Buena Vista
Purpose: A 5.7 foot sideyard setback variance
Ms. Aaker informed the board the property is located on the East side of
Limerick Lane, South of West 60th Street and West of 9 Mile Creek. The home
consists of a one story walkout rambler with a side loading tuck under two car garage.
The home owners are hoping to add twelve feet onto the North side of their home to
allow for a dinette area and a den.
Ms. Aaker concluded given the placement of the home on the lot and design
constraints with regard to the floor plan and walkout nature of the home, staff
supports the request.
Mr. Wallenfriedman was present to respond to questions.
Mr. Hale asked Ms. Aaker the required setback for a deck. Ms. Aaker said a
deck has a 5 foot setback.
1
Mr. Runyan stated in viewing the site and plans it appears the way the house
is situated on the lot the only way to add is as presented.
Ms. Aaker said that is correct because of house placement they cannot go
forward into the frontyard.
Mr. Hale questioned why they cannot expand out the rear. Ms. Aaker explained
the floor plan of the house does not lend itself well for that.
Mr. Wallenfriedman explained because of the location of the fireplace, and deck,
their position made it difficult for other design options. Mr. Wallenfriedman added
windows will be added to improve the side view of the house.
Mr. Hale stated he is uncomfortable with granting a variance so close to the lot
line, and agrees the placement of windows will break up mass.
Mr. Wallenfriedman pointed out the houses are not placed exactly next to each
other. He pointed out the way the houses are laid out overlapping would not occur.
Mrs. Utne agreed she pointed out the nearest homes are not in conflict with
each other.
Mr. Runyan explained to Mr. Wallenfriedman the board carefully considers the
setback issue when the variance is for living space. Continuing, Mr. Runyan said
ordinance standards require living space to be farther from property lines because the
are "active areas". Mr. Runyan said in all situations we consider spacing between
homes, and in this instance any impact should be minimal. The houses within this
area have adequate spacing.
Mr. Hale reiterated while he is uncomfortable with living space closer than five
feet to a property line this situation is unique because of the location of the existing
house. Mr. Hale said the granting of this variance is not precedent setting because
of its uniqueness.
Mrs. Utne moved variance approval subject to the plans submitted, with the
condition that materials are to match the existing structure, noting the location of the
existing house. Mr. Hale seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
B-94-43 Charles and Kathy Urban
4617 Arden Avenue
Lot 9, Block 11, Country Club District
Fairway Section
2
Request: A .67 foot north sideyard setback variance and a 1.67 foot south
sideyard setback variance
Ms. Aaker informed the board the subject property is located on the East side
of Arden Avenue in the historic Country Club district. The home is a one and one half
story English Cottage style home which was built in 1930. The home has a one car
attached garage. The home owners are hoping to add on a second (tandem) garage
stall, mudroom and family room on the main level and a master bedroom, study and
bathroom on the second floor. All aspects of the home design conform to the
ordinance requirements with the exception of the new tandem garage/mudroom
portion of the addition and the second story master bath.
Ms. Aaker concluded given the limited ability to provide a minimum two car
garage and given the minimal impact the variances may have with respect to a
conforming solution, staff can support the request as submitted.
The proponents Mr. and Mrs. Urban were present.
Mrs. Utne pointed out in viewing the site and looking at the photos presented
this evening there is a barrier of dense vegetation between the subject home and the
most impacted neighbor. Ms. Aaker said that is correct, the hedge and driveway
create a buffer, and the most impacted neighbor's garage is adjacent.
Mrs. Utne questioned if the large tree on the south side will have to be
removed. Mr. Urban said the tree will be saved.
Mr. Olson asked Mr. and Mrs. Urban if they ever considered constructing a two
car garage in the rearyard. Mrs. Urban responded if a detached two car garage is
constructed in the rear the entire backyard will be consumed.
Mr. Urban added he believes the architect was very sensitive with his design
to the existing house, and the neighborhood in general. He concluded stating he
believes the addition blends very well.
Mr. Hale moved variance approval. Mrs. Utne seconded the motion. All voted
aye; motion carried.
III. ADJOURNMENT
Mrs. Utne moved adjournment at 5:55 p.m. &, ) V�m A a@w�
Jac i Hoogenakker
3