HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994 09-22 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes RegularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE EDINA ZONING BOARD
HELD ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 22, 1994, 5:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon Johnson, Don Patton, Mike Lewis, Geof
Workinger, Helen McClelland
STAFF PRESENT: Kris Aaker, Jackie Hoogenakker
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Mr. Patton moved approval of the July 21, 1994, meeting minutes. Mr.
Workinger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
B-94-44 Edward D. Dahill
5524 Chantrey Road
Lot 14, Smildens Addition to Edina
Zoning: R-1
Request: A two foot frontyard setback variance
Ms. Aaker informed the board the subject property is located on the west side
of Chantrey Road south of Ayrshire Boulevard and north of Vernon Avenue. The
home in question is a one story rambler built in 1953. The home owner is planning
to add a porch onto the rear of the home, a bay window to the front of the home and
to add four feet onto the front of the home to expand bedroom areas.
Ms. Aaker explained the existing bedrooms are minimal in size (11'2" X 10'4"
and 12' X 10' respectively). The homeowner has indicated in the attached letter that
he anticipates that his daughter, son-in-law and two grandchildren will be moving into
live with him now that his wife has passed away. The property owner believes that
the existing bedrooms are small as compared with todays standards and will not
comfortably accommodate four additional occupants.
Ms. Aaker concluded given the curvature of the street and minimal scope of the
variance, staff supports the request.
The proponent, Mr. Dahill was present.
Mr. Johnson questioned the content of surveys contained in city files. Ms.
Aaker stated most surveys do not show the cantilevered aspects of a dwelling, they
only show the footprint.
Mr. Patton stated he does not have a problem with the request, but has a
concern with the potential for ice build-up on the proposed front stoop. Mr. Patton
also questioned if the overhang will be constructed with footings. Mr. Dahill
responded the overhang will be constructed with footings four feet deep. Mr. Dahill
added the area under the stoop will become crawl space. Continuing, Mr. Dahill
stated in his opinion the roof pitch of the overhang should prevent ice buildup.
Ms. McClelland commented the inclusion of constructing a bay window in the
front helps balance the facade. Mr. Dahill said he agrees, adding in his opinion he said
the bay window creates harmony. Ms. McClelland concluded she does not have a
problem with the request, pointing out the curve of the street reduces impact.
Mr. Workinger asked if identical brick will be used throughout the addition.
Mr. Dahill stated the brick will be matched.
Mr. Lewis commented that the curve in the road causes a hardship for this
property adding he can support the request as presented.
Mr. Lewis moved variance approval subject to plans presented, the use of
consistent materials, noting the curve in the road creates a hardship that is not self
imposed. Mr. Patton seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
B-94-46 C. Mickenzie and Mary P. Lewis
5759 Long Brake circle
Lot 15, Block 3, Dewey Hill Second Addition
Request: A 3.4 square foot variance to allow a fireplace footing to
encroach into the frontyard setback area in excess of the
allowable 10 square feet.
Ms. Aaker informed the board the subject property is located on the west side
of Long Brake Circle, south of Long Brake Trail and north of West 78th Street. The
homeowners are remodelling their home which includes a new fireplace along the front
face of the home.
Ms. Aaker concluded it wouldn't appear that the added 3.4 square feet of
fireplace footing would adversely impact the neighboring properties or streetscape.
Staff recommends approval of the request.
Mr. Noonan, of Noonan Construction was present to respond to questions.
Mr. Workinger stated in his opinion there are no issues regarding the fireplace
encroachment. Board members agreed.
Mr. Workinger moved variance approval. Mr. Lewis seconded the motion. All
voted aye; motion carried.
III. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m.