The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2012-01-11 Planning Commission Meeting PacketsAGENDA CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 11, 2012 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the December 14, 2011, Planning Commission Meeting. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Planning Commission will invite, residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings,"the Chair will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Chair may modify times as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. ' B-11-14 A 5.7' Front Yard Setback Variance Denison 5805 Johnson Drive, Edina, MN 2011.0016.11a Lot Division James Zavora) 5239 Highwood Drive, Edina, MN 2011.0015.11a Preliminary Plat Approval Refined, LLC 6109 Oaklawn Avenue, Edina, MN 2011.0004.11b Final Site Plan Children's Design Group/Primrose School of Edina 7401 Metro Boulevard, Edina, MN VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS 1 • Council Connection IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS X. STAFF COMMENTS XI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting. Next Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission: January 25, 2012 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 11, 2011 2011-014.11b Director of Planning INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Project Description Children's Design Group is requesting a Site Plan review to develop the recently created lot at 7401 Metro Boulevard with a Primrose Day Care Center. (See project location on pages Al—A4, and the applicant narrative and plans on pages A5 A18.) During the final platting of this property in September of 2011, this same building was contemplated for construction on the site. Access to the site would be off Metro Boulevard. No new curb cut would be created. Parking for the site would be provided from the lot to the south through a shared parking arrangement. The outdoor play area would be enclosed for security, with an ornamental six-foot black picket fence. (See page A10a.) The building would be built of stone and hardie plank lap siding with wood finish. The roof would be made of architectural asphalt shingles. (See pages A7a—A7c.) The applicant will have a materials board to present to the Planning Commission the night of the public hearing. Parking and traffic studies were done to review impacts that the proposed development would have on the site and surrounding roadways. (See the parking study on pages A20 --A28 and the traffic study on pages A29—A60.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A three-story office building; zoned POD -1, Office District and guided Office. Easterly: Highway 100. Southerly: A six -story office building; zoned POD -2, Office District and guided Office. Westerly: Edina Public Works; zoned PID, Industrial and guided Industrial. Existing Site Features The subject property contains a parking lot attached to a six -story office building with 557 parking stalls. (See pages A3—A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Office Zoning: POD -2, Office Parking A shared parking arrangement is proposed with the lot to the south. Based on the size of the existing building on lot to the south, 454 parking stalls are required. Both lots currently contain 557 stalls; however, 72 would be removed with the new building, for a total of 485. With the proposed day care use on the site, based on a maximum of 22 employees and 180 children on the site at one time, 485 stalls would be required for both lots. The applicant has provided a proof -of -parking plan that demonstrates that an additional 21 stalls could easily be added for a total of 506 stalls should parking ever become a problem and more stalls needed. (See page A18.) Additionally, the applicant provided a parking study that concludes that there would be more than enough parking spaces on the site. (See pages A20— A28.) Specifically the study indicates that 309 is the peak parking demand for the site, therefore, there would still be an excess of nearly 200 stalls. Before issuance of a building permit, a shared parking arrangement with the southern lot must be executed. Site Access The primary access to the site would remain off Metro Boulevard. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 22 overstory trees are required. The landscape and site plans demonstrate that there would be 22 existing and proposed overstory trees on the site. Additionally, full complements of understory plantings are also proposed along the site entrance and front entrance to the building. (See pages A15—A16.) 2 Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading, drainage and utility plans and has provided comment on page Al 9. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit would be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Building Design The building would be built of stone and hardie plank lap siding with wood finish. The roof would be made of architectural asphalt shingles. (See page A7a) The applicant will have a materials board to present to the Planning Commission the night of the public hearing. Compliance Table Primary Issue • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the POD -2 District. 3 City Standard Proposed Front — Metro Boulevard 35 feet 36 feet Rear — Highway 100 20 feet 35 feet Side — South 20 feet 200+ feet Building Height 8 stories or 1 story and 18 feet 96 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 30% 13% Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 20 feet (existing) parking is setback located on the adjacent lot Parking Stalls 485,(overall site) 506 with the proof -of - parking plan (485 existing stalls) Overstory Trees 22 required 22 existing and proposed (number is based on the perimeter of the entire development site) Primary Issue • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the POD -2 District. 3 2. The proposed plan creates development over a parking lot that is not used by the existing office at 7401 Metro Boulevard. 3. The proposed Site Plan meets all applicable zoning ordinance requirements. 4. The parking and traffic studies done by Spack Consulting conclude that there would be adequate parking, and the use would not have a negative impact on adjacent roadways. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan at 7401 Metro Boulevard for the Primrose Day Care. Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan. 2. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact and parking study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project, and there would be more than enough parking. Approval of the Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: I Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Site plan date stamped November 28, 2011. • Grading plan date stamped November 28, 2011. Landscaping plans date stamped November 28, 2011 and January 5, 2012. Building elevations date stamped November 28, 2011 and January 6, 2012, Building materials board including colors as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of -credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 4 City of Edina sm r.. r 9 Metro BlvdEdina, I7401 MN 55439 At A City of Edina YPPI r`.i t Tjl1 TP11# ""' - " TP1k 1gYK'YYAtE tyro/7 Pd ,..�"f(�I}+-.,/7, f 7ti@ 1 'µ P� aS'�+&YP' Lsptrgi rdF 8 ._ iMIh1i�Mf1WM Nswt Mleohmr LAW16 ftff R L*ww 5PW U�. CTt@ 1iYi ([ t4P9f4@5ti61 1&i5 to? ftt Cftj Lim ifs JA 010 pwo l0 .J P�rceh IPSP 1\ !1N Y^ � PTrP dt" ........ w .-..�. _..�......,. Q t,#llfT N 140 SRV TPfA 31A1 7101 N51 Pa #97! #@N daPO .dolt SPm 5187 51IX sr1T 510 Iwo �" � � «PP# 40t? ##esu dew #aOd A-40711! � 143 11x+0 mm� � 1 400 730#. #301 ItntsLff -.-.- 7# 1#13 ' $ K `.: 4M 1311 wwrOR ANfNtl71#I tm P5OP 716P 11b5 INS IEI ON P6aV 41" IllN /YQ1k#PONL OI.VO tTtN Sfto4120 F15io1 IL� PID: 0911621310017 = fn 7401 Metro Glad Edina, MN 55439LOW +fyCYalfi'f?1�wS`T~ s 1111111 A am V.ar.sad a-tr haPJfi C.m.r V%iCi ioC;t5Lit5N73 M # c r ! r x 4',x� Asa ZEr Date: November 28, 2011 To: City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50`x' Street Edina, MN 55424 By: Children's Design Group Mark D. Pavey, AIA — Architect 1114 Eagles Creek Way Acworth, GA 30101 Project: Primrose School at Edina 7401 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN, 55439 Subject: Application Narrative 1. General Description The proposed Primrose School of Edina will be a high quality provider of child care and early childhood education for 181 children ages 6 week to 12 years, employing 40+ teachers & staff. The building will cover 12,000 square feet +/- on a 1 acre lot. The facility will generally be open 6:00 am to 6:30 PM Monday through Friday. The children in our care will be kept on premises at all times except for planned field trips in the area. Primrose currently has franchise's operating in Savage, Eden Prairie, Maple Grove, Woodbury, Plymouth, Blaine, Lakeville, and Egan. 2. Existing Land Use The land is vacant and is zoned Planned Office District 2 (POD -2), child care is permitted by right. 3. Phasing- Construction Schedule All work will be done in a single phase. After zoning approval and obtaining building permits, we estimate 6 months will be required for construction. I IN !,!,Iw o>,Ri 4. Development Method Primrose Schools are owned by a local member orthe community. The franchise owner is responsible for financing the purchase of the land and construction of the school; additionally, the franchise owner is required to be onsite during the schools hours of operation. The project's architectural development and construction administration will be performed by Children's Design Group (CDG), who has over 23 years of childcare facility development experience. All development and construction work will be competitively bid by General Contractors who specialize in the construction of educational childcare facilities. S. Signage We have proposed a monument sign as shown on the site plan and site details. An attractive building sign is shown on the front elevation. Shade shelters are provided with logos. 6. Traffic/Parking Analysis Traffic will not be adversely impacted in the surrounding area as the school ties in the natural traffic pattern of most commuters. Parents will be commuting in a direction that would take them directly by or near the school. Unlike a retail operation, the parents will be very familiar with the traffic patterns and volumes at the school and will adjust to the daily traffic accordingly. The school will have 43 dedicated parking spaces, 2 of which are handicapped accessible. Parents are required to physically bring their child or children into the center and sign in and out. Many times the parent will have a short discussion with the child's caregiver. With 23 (max at any one time) spaces allocated for staff and van parking, a total of 20 spaces will be provided for unloading and loading. Our studies and experience tell us the average time for loading and unloading (parking time) is seven minutes. With 18 spaces allocated for parents, a total of 154 cars per hour could be accommodated, far more than necessary to accommodate the 181 children that would come from approximately 135 families using the center. Arrivals occur from 6:00am until gam and departures are generally from 3pm to 6:30pm. From our experience with the design of over 600 centers in the past 20 years, we assure you adequate parking is provided. 7. Building Material and Design Elements - The building has been designed to fit with the attractive architecture of the area. Each elevation has features to enhance the area's aesthetic. The building is tied to the ground with strong horizontal lines and a defined brick base with horizontal siding above. The building has been designed to look "homelike". Each elevation has features to enhance the residential aesthetic. The roof will be architectural shingles. The building has a "T" plan to break down the visual mass of the building. Visible wall faces are articulated to add interest and reduce the scale. Gables are used to break the roof plane. Security is a top concern for Primrose. Security is provided at the front door of the school with an electronic check-in system for children. Playgrounds are fenced and gated, Primrose provides a building that exceeds requirements for fire sallety. Not only for fire egress but also for case of operations, each classroom has direct exit and access to outside playground areas. Every Primrose building is also equipped with a fire alarm and smoke detection system. The Primrose interior decor creates a soft, warm, homelike environment through the u"_OfX� and wood trim. The plan consists of closed classrooms that are all sized larger than state requirements. 0C, 11:1 4 J)IIINIA Classrooms are bright and cheerful with lots of windows. Areas for computers are provided for all children over the age of three. Older children are provided state of the art audiovisual equipment as well. S. Other - There are no major high powered electrical lines near the site that would generate potentially harmful electromagnetic fields. This site will not generate ftinics, odors, glare, vibration, gases, radiation, dust, liquid waste, or smoke and there are no sites nearby that would generate the same that would impact the school. Conclusion Rest assured that as owner/operators, we intend to keep the premises in a safe, clean, neat, and wholesome condition. By the nature of our service, we shall comply in all respects with all governmental, health and police requirements. In conclusion, we firmly believe the Primrose School of Edina will be an asset to the community and will provide a safe, clean, and friendly environment for both the children in our care and the surrounding community. mp—p� HLIJ , im w CIOUG/1 19100 W076104IOPUPSAGIMPOW-) X091 CKO-OGG-90C 9b6g-G86-OLL IOICX Y9'4lJOm7V ,;vm vDa-) salf-a vIII 1701149JV - 'V'I-Y'FiPAOj -0 -44014 drIOA-D LifWDO Cu-a*ll4:) vlosawlH 'Wica VNI(32 d0100H asoNNIaw :01IG 5HINGLE5, SANDSTONE BEIGE - TRIM 'Iy BINLDING STONE OM --TER 6ATES (POST 4 HINGES) 0100 112 TATE OLIVE ORWRIAL EHAI-EL. EXTERIOR APPLICATOO EXTERM M), TRIM, EXTERIOR TO MA10 WAVE TRIM DOORS. FRAM I LOWERS. 5MMTOTE DE16E JF 20 CWOLA MALLS. GUTTERS AW (8M HC•62 or 511 5W 661) AW OMISIAM5. WFIT5.. COLOR, Y"THERED WOOD EXTERIOR NARDIE TRIM SAND5TOW BE16E JGO-20 PASLIA, FRIEZE TBM W-82 or SW SW 6151) mwol$ BEIGE AL "KH SIDEIs MATCH MA M SAIL CLOM J120 -IO ASPHALT SWN6LES, MAW., W,F STYLE, TIMBERLINE SERIES, T-30 HM 15RADOW ACCENT' COLOR, Y"THERED WOOD NOTE, ALL ROOF MWnO EOAPWNT SNAIL BE PAINTED TO MATCH ROOF COLOR VINYL STUTTERS ARCNITWTLRALMPOTPAM -14" JON D SIUrrERS MNSTALL SCREYG WOE STANDARD SIZE FOUL BOARD PREPIMS}ED 1262 COLONIAL 6REEN STANNN6 SEAM ROOFIN&. KYW WO -'DARK BRONZE' WLDIN6 WOM, LCIESTAR STONE - LN*RTY CLASSIC COLOR - An" MTN Off 6R0Ur PAINT - TATE OLIVE HNDOW-SHUTTERS STANDING SEAM ROOFING 51tF3: CNldren'3 De3lgn Group d`. Mark D. Pavey, A.I.A. - Architect PRIMR05E 50HOOL of 1114 "too Greek Nky EDINA Acworth, 6A 30101 170-465-606 EPINA, MINWSOTA 206-350-0543 FOX child.deoignommdspr"40m ,P fH�tS Date, 1/5/2012 -a N -NI ."i v M m 9 13-1 y [I If I H Ii lilt 1 .11 Jill i v IL !Ill fli ;411 oosEow uto r6o, a m 9 13-1 y I g iic i ' r LL IL r , . I r3 VO,I j tm R a xi s �'f'�t, zdii o '�z E C ga ?_u�fu° 111,11 HIM ;t !d Ebdb I it l i` ��; , a jlii �� his Ito �y;yy��y3yq�� WITH, ano13 aA Oos S 001N33M139jX3NpZ ` — a° «pDT On hVMH91H 31d1S - -i - 63A31 aOO7i BAaoS'8 OT M33iVttJei �t�NUX ` —+� 41( t x Cr rj \• A it 4 1 'K \ + d � � i W. Ant / / / r11 fy}� r rf, � fG11+fr 0 12 --- Rnfra �L�.a'—aJ' wN ARIILI� OXY Client x PE", Ir it 1Ectrro CHILDREN'S +iw+r•lrManMi DESIGN GROUP 1[:iLMAt$G/ttrM tCi�vN. ra,mx. NtY warawnrc,aw.,eamrnrswrrn vena .nxn. Project PRIMROSE •,. _ SCHOOL OF EDINA aMv,s�o.. cams�r.mm� rm.rssmm,o�wsns.wnin Location �..�..vow. arx.oin��y.or eao.ern me.ue':wr+r..enn smaa..uo..mo.aa..i aaana..atmm� MINNESOTA ..+^ M� m uu wntil�'�,Y�p1W. cVp W a nsawa�.wer.svaa,ni memmwunwam Certification -t 'ani+cFc+uaacaero.taaaauaanu�cwwmrnucw n uaniurxu.�.s ss.wrcra:,s,aa..w � �ss+.ti nnr�iete.�.."^ivsrueu. 'd z . mounna,nw.uaexiss+wrrwavcun,avnror+. unvts..iwa.+�rs.,ea+wnna„+tsstwn rnm+rsrn evrrawsw'n.sena.ne,an,u,en..n�.sK a+am»,nos*wnn+w.wtwnomwaew.arss�rarrm w.xwt� .wau. ra�m�vew.au orneza+ru*w.�.xuarci — n, �erou.ncww.sronr,..stwuaawwemwmrnna �a4r. YP�[Gat�i�amn�r� ia..+..a.,nr.,ws.wva �6Lr4.l6t.t411i4Y9141111t1aVin.[�YO,A.r11WNtLTn,ft SYfnalary� r'�"�a .",� � '°�.�.......s`.,n".m:.,,nri,. "' �I.r4_.1� Revision fiistory•_� tii.roor.r,-.,.�•d..a ai..ainr.a.,�...+..Qi r`� is6Ra.28t2apfWer+W YaRNirtai+CUC,9'l aaM.Fr. sBhe�e Sheet No. Revision 02.02 Propect No. CH419070 RV ---- ----- -------------- STATE HIGHWAY NO. 100 M S2 LA a-0 � 2 A ZZI m OV Orn 2Z o 1--02 a r m 2Z o a if SA A m � 1 attNLMYY p!!a _ , 4 f i rr_fii avev�t r�--rw� CATCH BASM CASTOC AND CM OCTAL SWTAAY SEMI WtVa ca"Cow .P aca C416/ SAM NI *w w aL+u R9ttAL cLEANouT [(2At +c t ct -_ ar rd a R.Y► �rt`�•.w �a firP� 0 f 9CYNi D aM j Vfin.IJ '� eil PST s.or .as xvrsuoo •ate s �. N�f�nO�.t4i aYirllw.141 p.ewasa Pruar•nrra... (3i f1�f�Y ••aab/�� lfaia.Lr-1!wsb CP YY=aM�MY.OPf K7l.� O'Mf MP.itL+•r�:Y[Y d. a •f�N—O� tf WOls ilsll b rLzsa — 0050PRUA am RAIN ww�L �%PgAY cwNrA+Lw urn,a Alt! Fill r` ORNAMENTAL CAtE zI. f ra Client CHILDREN'S DESIGN GROUP SL:aiVdiINM 4w4M41��1 F; PRIMROSE SCHOOL OF EDINA Laotian EDINA, MINNESOTA CertifKation Summary Revision H7,R,- 4�' Sh- CON CTION DETAILS Sheet No. Revision C9.01 PrejearaL CMM70 W'.RK mYrl Ylrw ®Au �K..., iN w> S rmsc.o �f mmiaN CATE VALVE AND 9I RISTAtATM .—L �%PgAY cwNrA+Lw urn,a Alt! Fill r` ORNAMENTAL CAtE zI. f ra Client CHILDREN'S DESIGN GROUP SL:aiVdiINM 4w4M41��1 F; PRIMROSE SCHOOL OF EDINA Laotian EDINA, MINNESOTA CertifKation Summary Revision H7,R,- 4�' Sh- CON CTION DETAILS Sheet No. Revision C9.01 PrejearaL CMM70 CL U,SA p CI i;I �3� xh rc p' to riak( Eft �2 z s d lit 9 z g" z x La j yy FIJI p m a 4A w 9 w $? B aft i�nt9 U o t i 1 t� i �� i t Yt t� 'a � r �t. a� }➢ �� E� t fa r� tr �i�r i� 9 �� t1 7� >! lit rpt igpprlaII 4I r . I: Q r Ix3 iJ EI 1 pp� 8•r ?I i i��,t ��;�st � lid t� �tR � @g° ��E�� l�z�q: pt t�i5 I��*��' � 4 �� " �� !"� (� � I,� � I � h I*r � � g t i E�� • �� E� R �� i�;r �"�' � �� I t n r� �' Ts EI i 10��, i ` ' * �� E ��s' R � Ii � jlEtlII" „!° I 1t I Hal 4€III I�� r '-" ,d04�ONlFitMH�IH 311115 �� , � hi k +�t 01 0 ol K2"dg ..iQ�w� a z ; � ' ll� E 1,1! �a y Etf c> a �0,,� 1AV 150lit EMM 1"2 v r, iWKU- FAoa iwvIsI C ti ; 1 �t�� . �i °His 11, rior All°� �rt ,L z , wJ 13}i1� i{{8i n i1 dZ _ZO _ 8 m ]yiun k a 41 w 8. 1!, 1, 41 }1[ K$ ��rY? .; -� W t1f OU 4 u� u g F oil JIM If sold, I 11H I 3 w - fill. l LIP "411i eft j1 110�t NQ 4 y Y u V 9 x a s w .7 w c°i if4tt M 11 If y ,�,i ,A V e 5 x r 3 all p= ESra 11111,111 H ,1'Y•-g1gP nF7 lie �f�,11111 M �� ffi a ni �' 7 g0g1 M €, 1,.iiE��6fi H % p gra E 8 x z 7 ?:A �. !!*6 B 9 G b l 8 g vi p g1:�y�1ij q! '�c�°� 5! a s% 51 rg� �•p I �5� � y��g�}ggL 4� � g Y � ;6gs 7' nax��a4J y 001 'ON AVMHJIH Y I 4t1� LA' %A 0 0 j 111110 t if 11 , � i, jh z Mif 2s Z cc 8 g jz r4 x all fl 0 u 71 IL tA W w 2 AA� 9 AA� fill oil 1A° . . ... . ........ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CL I c v4 JA fill, rtl At� I IN rr 4-1 .r" - tom. AS -BUILT IRRIGATION, PEQUIROWNTS C— oa PXA, \ (-9NI-I -uR -1114 E WtNT KIT Z/ M IRRIGATION' GUIDELINES Ar CL Qlt ............. . 7- 1 GROUP Kj Revision PraiealML CHIIS070 I I D)Z Rnfra E) Client CHILDREN'S DESIGN GROUP Project PRIMROSE SCHOOLOF EDINA toation EDINA, MINNESOTA Summary Revision HistoryM Sheet TiMe PROOF OF PARKING EXHIBIT Sheet No. Revision PP XBT Project No. CHM9070 PROF OF PARR f P 1, #A) Plan Review lye MEMORANDUM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: January 5, 2012 TO: Cary Teague - City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle - Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Primrose School of Edina 7401 Metro Boulevard Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: 1. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the plans that are submitted for building permits. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks G WAADMIMCOMWEXTERNALZENCRAL CORR BY STREETSIM SIFeetaV401 Metro Blvd\20120105 romw x17401 Motro 8000vartJ dou Spack fRAFfIC STUDY COMPANY Traffic and Parking Study One Corporate Circle Edina, MND I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duty Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: _ f%- MiS,Kael P. Spark, P.E , '.T.O.E. MN License No. 40936 Date: May 9, 2011 'qd ;•: T" -i j, 31j,.. r. i ! 1. Executive Summary............................................................................. 1 / 22. Existing Parking Data.......................................................................... 3. Parking Forecasts and Analyses........................................................3 4. Conclusions and Recommendations.................................................4 5. Appendix................•.......•.....................................................................• 4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 — Location Maps.............................................................................................1 Figure2 — Existing Parking Trendline......................................................................... 2 Figure 3 — Factored Parking Trendline for Office Full Occupancy ............................3 One Cogorate Circle Parking Impact Shut), z Edina, AIN Alay 2011 1. Executive Summary a. Background and Purpose Hempel Properties manages One Corporate Circle, a 110,975 gross square foot office complex located at 7401 Metro Boulevard in Edina, MN (see Figure 1). The purpose of this study is to assess the parking feasibility of adding a 11,500 square foot day care center to the northern portion of the site. = One Corporate Circle in Edina, MN Figure 1'— Location Maps b. Results If the existing One Corporate Circle building was fully occupied, it is anticipated 266 of the 557 parking spaces would be tilled with vehicles during the peak parking period. The proposed day care center footprint will eliminate 65 parking stalls leaving the office building's associated peak parking with 226 vacant parking stalls. At the day care center's peak parking period, which is conservatively being combined to coincide with the office building's peak, the day care center will need 43 parking stalls. Based on the analyses in this study, it is expected peak parking demand would occupy 309 of the 492 available parking stalls after the proposed 11,500 square foot day care center is built on the site. There will continue to be ample parking on the One Corporate Circle site after the day care center is fully operational. One Carporate Circle Parking Impact Studj, 20 Edina, A -IN May tot 2. Existing Parking Data a. Data Collection Procedure The parking lot was divided into three zones and a visual count was made every half hour to determine how many cars were parked in each of the three zones. A map showing the three zones is included in Appendix A. The first count was started at 8:00 a.m, and the last count was started at 4:30 p.m. Counts were collected on Thursday, May 5, 2011. Data was recorded in 30 minute increments using hand held data collection equipment (Jamar Count Boards). b. Existing Parking Utilization The three zones contain a total of 557 parking stalls. This includes 545 regular stalls and 12 handicap stalls. The most stalls occupied on Thursday, May 5th (197) occurred at 10:30a.m. which represents 35.4% of the available parking. A trendline of the site's parking occupancy for May 5th is shown in Figure 2. Detailed existing parking data by zones and in total is contained in Appendix A. 600 500 400 V) Lam 200 11 lic ox -*X < -IC < -< 10� 0- 8c,8R,-'p',q8R n 0 en '4 4 1-4 --+—Total COPICIty --*—OcCtIp!cd5/5/11 Figure 2 — Existing Parking Trendline 222222212; M :L n- a_ a a- M C, ,n r -I One Coiporwc Circle 2 diner, Alm Parking ImpacISIu4i, 11a y, 2011 3. Parking Forecasts and Analyses a. Parking with Full Occupancy One Corporate Circle currently has a 22.1% vacancy rate. To be conservative in the assessment of maximum parking needs, we factored the actual counts by 22.1 % plus an additional 5% to allow a "safety factor". Figure 3 shows the factored parking trendline. Factoring the peak demand of 197 parked vehicles results in a maximum of 266 vehicles parked on site, which represents 47.7% of the available parking. Detailed factored parking data by zones and in total is contained in Appendix C. I IaUIG N-1 0M1WIVU I QIr%IJIkf IIGIIUIIIIG /VI VIIIUW PUII VG{iUfJAIIGy b. Forecast Parking A parking generation analysis was performed for the proposed development based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition, The Manual is a compilation of data collected at existing facilities throughout the United States. The peak parking periods for a day care center (ITE land use code 565) areom 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The peak ing demand on site occurred at 10:30 a.m., which does not coinc' ith the peak period of the proposed day care center. To be co ativk, the peak parking to be generated by the day care center w alig'with the site's peak. One Cnrnnrate Circle 3 Eciina, AIN Parking Impact Sti0j, May, 11111 44 The 85" percentile peak period parking demand for a day care center is 3.70 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Using this parking rate results in needing 43 parking stalls for an 11,500 square foot day care center. Of the 557 parking spaces supplied on site, 266 spaces would be expected to be occupied if the site's buildings are fully leased and 65 spaces would be expected to be eliminated to make room for the day care center. This leaves 226 parking spaces vacant to be used by the day care center. 4. Conclusions and Recommendations If the existing One Corporate Circle buildings were fully occupied, it is anticipated 266 of the 557 parking spaces would be filled with vehicles during the peak parking period. The proposed day care center footprint will eliminate 65 parking stalls leaving the office building's associated peak parking with 226 vacant parking stalls. At the day care center's peak parking period, which is conservatively being combined to coincide with the office building's peak, the day care center will need 43 parking stalls. Based on the analyses in this study, it is expected peak parking demand would occupy 309 of the 492 available parking stalls after the proposed 11,500 square foot day care center is built on the site. There will continue to be ample parking on the One Corporate Circle site after the day care center is fully operational. 5. Appendix A. Existing Parking Capacity and Occupancy S. Factored Parking Capacity and Occupancy One Corporate Circle Parking Impart Studdlf 4� 4' Selina, UN Maj,, 2011 One Coiporale Circle 5 ,4114 Parking Impact Studj, 00), 2011 Appendix A Existing Parking Capacity and Occupancy —i IOWA Obw > Zone 2 Zone I 1"j One Corporate Circle Parking Zones One Coiporale Circle 5 ,4114 Parking Impact Studj, 00), 2011 Existing Parking Capacity and Occupancy One Corporate Circle Raw Parking Data: Thursday - May 6 2071 TIME Zone 1 Zone 2 Total Zone 3 occupied 6!6/11 TOW :% Occupied 8:00 AM 41 49 1 91 16.3 8:30 AM 60 65 1 126 22.6 9:00 AM 78 75 1 154 27.6 9:30 AM 90 86 1 177 31.8 10:00 AM 102 88 1 191 34.3 10:30 AM 103 93 1 1.97 35.4 11:00 AM 105 90 1 196 35.2 11:30 AM 104 87 1 192 34.5 12:00 PM 98 87 2 187 33.6 12:30 PM 93 81 2 1 176 31.6 1:00 PM 94 84 1 179 32.1 1:30 PM 90 76 1 167 30.0 2:00 PM 97 74 1 172 30.9 2:30 PM 102 86 0 188 33.8 3:00 PM 94 80 0 1 174 31.2 3:30 PM 86 72 0 158 28.4 4:00 PM 73 1 59 0 132 1 23.7 4:30 PM 62 1 52 0 114 1 20.5 CAPACITY 287 1 205 1 65 I 557 One C otporate Circle Parkins; Lnpact Study al Mina, UA' 34a),, 2011 Appendix B Factored Parking Capacity and Occupancy One Corporate Circle Factored Parkins Data: Thursday - May 5, 2011 TIME Zone 9 Zane 2 Zone 3 Total occupied Total % occupied Factored occupied Factored % ,Occupied 8:00 AM 41 49 1 91 16.3 123 22.0 8:30 AM 60 65 1 126 22.6 170 30.5 9:00 AM 78 75 1 154 27.6 208 37.3 9:30 AM 90 86 1 177 31.8 239 42.8 10:00 AM 102 88 1 1 191 34.3 257 46.2 10:30 AM 103 93 1 197 35.4 266 47.7 11:00 AM 105 90 1 196 1 35.2 264 47.4 11:30 AM 104 87 1 192 34.5 259 46.5 12:00 PM 98 87 2 187 33.6 252 45.3 12:30 PM 93 81 2 176 31.6 237 42.6 1:00 PM 94 84 1 1 179 32.1 241 43.3 1:30 PM 90 76 1 167 30.0 225 40.4 2:00 PM 97 74 1 172 30.9 232 41.6 2:30 PM 102 86 0 188 33.8 253 45.5 3:00 PM 94 80 0 174 31.2 235 42.1 3:30 PM 86 72 0 158 28.4 213 38.2 4:00 PM 73 59 0 132 23.7 178 31.9 4:30 PM 62 52 0 114 20.5 154 27.6 CAPACITY 1 287 1 205 65 557 r FACTOR 1 1.348 One Corporate Or cle Parking Impact .study In AN 2011 AWWWAhL aQ .fie . THE 1114"IC STUDY COMPANY Traffic Impact Study Primrose School of Edina Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the Slate of Minuesott. te r+ I— By- Miufiael P. Spack, P.R. License No. 40936 Decgmber 20.r ;tY�� `� �t i �`1tt"x $�`ttf,ti �r LOIt�� r j s 37�*�,+�, �tV�i' Spa6�+��t5dltitt��e0tt► TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Summary.......................................................1 2. Proposed Development............................................................ 2 3. Analysis of Existing Conditions ............................................... 4 4. Projected Traffic......................................................................10 Figure 3.3 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes..................................9 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis.........................................19 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................... 21 7. Appendix..................................................................................21 LIST OF FIGURES Figure2.1 — Location Map..................................................................................2 Figure2.2 — Site Plan......................................................................................3 Figure 3.1 — Existing Transportation System .. ...............................................7 Figure 12 — Existing Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes.................................8 Figure 3.3 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes..................................9 Figure 4.1 — Trip Distribution......................................................................12 Figure 4.2 — Weekday AM Peak Hour Volume Due to Development.............13 Figure 4.3 — Weekday PM Peak Hour Volume Due to Development.............14 Figure 4.4 — 2013 No -Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes......................15 Figure 4.5 — 2013 No -Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes......................16 Figure 4.6 — 2013 Build Weekday AM Peak Hour Volumes ...........................17 Figure 4.7 — 2013 Build Weekday PM Peak Hour Volumes ............................18 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1— Existing Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)...................................6 Table4.1— Trip Generation..............................................................................11 Table 5.1— 2013 Level of Service (LOS)..........................................................19 Table 5.2 - Daily Traffic Volumes.....................................................................20 01 1. Introduction and Summary a. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives Children's Design Group is proposing to build an approximately 12,000 square foot daycare center on the northern corner of the parking lot at 7401 Metro Boulevard in Edina, MN. The daycare center will be known as the Primrose School and it will share the surface parking lot with the One Corporate Circle office building. The Traffic and Parking Study for One Corporate Circle dated May 9, 2011 found ample parking on site to accommodate the daycare center. The purpose of this report is to determine if the proposed daycare will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system in the near term and to recommend mitigation measures if necessary. The study objectives are: i. Document how the adjacent existing transportation system operates. ii. Analyze how the adjacent transportation system will operate in 2013 if there is no development. iii. Analyze how the adjacent transportation system will operate in 2013 with full development of the site. iv. Recommend improvements if needed. The scope of this traffic study follows the City of Edina's Transportation impact Analysis Initiation and Review Policy. The following intersections are analyzed in this study: i. West 70th Street/Metro Boulevard ii. Northern Site Driveway/Metro Boulevard iii. Southern Site Driveway/Metro Boulevard iv. Edina industrial Boulevard/Metro Boulevard b. Executive Summary The development is proposed to contain a 12,000 square foot daycare center with 45 parking stalls. The daycare center is anticipated to be fully operational by the year 2013. This report analyzes the 2013 No -Build and Build scenarios to determine if any transportation improvements will be necessary to allow traffic to operate acceptably after the development is fully occupied. Traffic Impact Study The study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably at Level of Service D or better in 2013 with the addition of traffic from the proposed development. No additional modifications to the existing public transportation system will be needed to accommodate the proposed development. Primrose School of Edina 2. Proposed Development a. Site Location The project site is located along Metro Boulevard northwest of the Highway 100 & Edina Industrial BoulevardANest 77th Street intersection in Edina, MN (see Figure 2.1). • 9%0t~ rW� W§%W Figure 2.1 -• Location Map b. Land Use and Intensity The proposed development will consist of a 12,000 square foot daycare center with a playground area. The proposed daycare center's footprint will eliminate 65 parking stalls and will be sharing a parking lot and driveways with the One Corporate Circle office building. A parking study at this lot was conducted by Spack Consulting in May of 2011. The study showed that there is expected to be adequate parking available after the daycare center is fully operational. The parking study can be found in the Appendix. c. Site Pian Traffic Impact Study See Figure 2.2 for the proposed site plan. d. Development Phasing and Timing The Primrose School daycare center is planned to be built and fully operational by 2013. 4) Primrose School of Edina Sp -al -c k Figure 2.2 Site Plan 14AFM STUDY COMPAKY Site Plan prepared for Children's Design Group by MpRA Traffic Impact Study 3 Primrose School of Edina k33 �tttt'''' �• ? � ,� g, �js h �y - ! CJS' � S' , J+��. C;3• w- t N STATE NIGIIWAYNO.100 z �� P¢�� # i' q �?d±�� i �i,!3 }'i�g�� z f � % i ; ' � '� yA, i x l �^ n g�$N i iyi d d W �gC3$•�� ;�'i7 gig Vt � t AAAAAA � k $ Sf A x • Site Plan prepared for Children's Design Group by MpRA Traffic Impact Study 3 Primrose School of Edina k33 3. Analysis of Existing Conditions a. Transportation !Network Characteristics Edina Industrial Boulevard is Municipal State Aid Street 136. It is designated as an "A" Minor Arterial and a Primary Bicycle Route in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. Edina Industrial Boulevard is a four lane road with a 30 mph speed limit near the site. West 70th Street is Municipal State Aid Street 145. It is designated as a Collector Street and a Primary Bicycle Route in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. West 701h Street is a four lane road east of Metro Boulevard and a two lane road west of Metro Boulevard with a 30 mph speed limit near the site. Metro Boulevard is Municipal State Aid Street 172. It is designated as a Collector Street and a portion of it is designated as a Primary Bicycle Route in the City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan. Metro Boulevard is a four lane road near the intersection with West 70th Street and a two lane road nearer to the site with a 30 mph speed limit. There are several bus stops served by Metro Transit buses near the proposed site. Stops are located west of the site along 74th Street West and south of the site along Metro Boulevard. These stops are served by Metro Transit routes 5, 540 and 578. Existing traffic control, speed limits and travel lanes are shown on Figure 3.1 for each study intersection. b. Traffic Volumes Turning movement volumes were counted at the study intersections between 6:00 am. and 7:00 p.m. on a typical weekday. The a.m. and p.m. peak hour times were determined from these counts to be: Traffic Impact Study • a.m, peak hour (between 7:30 and 8:30 a.m.) • p.m. peak hour (between 4:30 and 5:30 p.m.) The turning movement volumes were counted at the existing study intersections in December 2011 and are shown at the end of this section in Figures 3.2 and 3.3. The turning movement count data is contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. The data included in the Appendix also includes pedestrian counts (bicycles were counted as pedestrians), which were low during the study period (less than 25 pedestrians per crossing over the entire 13 Y Primrose School of Edina Traffic Impact Study hour count). The existing daily traffic volumes for the study intersections are shown in Table 5.2. ic. Level of Service LOS A An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersections are assigned a N "Level of Service" letter grade for the peak hour a of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and traffic control. Los c Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light ,w traffic flow (free flow conditions) while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions). LOS D at intersections is typically considered acceptable LOS 0 Acceptable in the Twin Cities region. individual movements r� are also assigned LOS grades. One or more individual movements typically operate at LOS F T when the overall intersection is operating acceptably at LOS D. The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades (from a signal t_os F Unacceptable controlled intersection in San Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the overall intersection operation, not individual movements. Source. City of The LOS results for the existing study hours San Jose, CA are shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.1. The existing turning movement volumes from Figures 3.2 and 3.3 were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done per the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual using TRAFFIXTM software. The signal timing plans used were determined through observation. The complete LOS calculations, which include grades for individual movements, are included in the Appendix. All study intersections currently operate acceptably at LOS D or better for both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Primrose School of Edina Traffic Impact Study Table 3.1 — Existing Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS)' R Intersection W 70 St/Metro Blvd a,m. Peak C d p.m. Peak D e Northern Site Drivewa /Metro Blvd A b A a Southern Site Driveway/Metro Blvd A b A b Edina Industrial Blvd/Metro Blvd B c C c 'The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection. I ne secona letter (in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement. gi Primrose School of Edina c:kFigure 3.1 Existing Lanes & Traffic Control Y/it TAAMC 10V:,Y t: ,IMPANV Traffic Impact Study 7 Primrose School of Edina p c"k STUOY COMPANY Figure 3.2 Existing ANN Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Traffic Impact Study Im 4D ""'Not. ►ryq fey No c/o�t c - No _ Ra■ le Primrose School of Edina p�-a-,,,,q tRAff IC STUDY COMPANY Figure 3.3 Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Traffic Impact Study Primrose School of Edna 4. Projected Traffic a. Site Trak Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the site based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 8t" Edition. The resultant trip generation is shown in Table 4.1. It was assumed that 10% of the trips to the daycare will come from "internal" trips. These internal trips are vehicles that will use the daycare but are already going to the site parking lot to use the businesses the daycare shares the lot with. Since these vehicles are already going to the site parking lot, these trips were reduced from the trip generation. The directional orientation of the generated traffic is shown in Figure 4.1. This orientation was determined by using existing daily traffic volumes as well as the collected turning movement counts. The distribution pattern takes into account site access and access to the regional transportation system. The traffic generated by the development was assigned to the area roadways per the trip distributions shown in Figure 4.1. The traffic volumes added to the study roadways through this process are shown in Figures 4.2 and 4.3. b. Non -site Trak Forecasting Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2013 scenario by applying a 0.96% compounded annual growth rate to the existing traffic volume data. This growth rate is based on the 20 -year growth factor of 1.1 the Mn/DOT State Aid office has assigned to Hennepin County. The 2013 No -Build forecasts for each study period are shown in Figures 4.4 and 4.5 at the end of this section. c. Total Traffic Traffic forecasts were developed for each study period in the year 2013 Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development (as shown in Figures 4.2 and 4.3) to the 2013 No -Build volumes (as shown in Figures 4.4 and 4.5). The resultant 2013 Build forecasts are shown in Figures 4.6 and 4.7. Traffic Impact Study 10 Primrose School of Edina E 'r- C co i SpacTRAffiC sTUOY COMPANY Figure 4.1 Trip Distribution Traffic Impact Study 12 Primrose School of Edina pa k Figure 4,2 - AM Peak Hour tAAMC $TUDY COMPANY Traffic Volumes Due to Development Traffic Impact Study 13 ME Primrose School of Edina a r^ Figure 4.3 - PM Peak Hour Spack r%eis,ac�r COMPANY Volumes Due to Development 40 sjre ay w$y Traffic Impact Study 14 NOM NO scW16 Primrose School of Edina Sp� t*Aff 4C i1018L+Yn qCf MPAW Figure 4.4 2013 AM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes Traffic Impact Study 15 Primrose School of Edina P, a q , k ilR,�rr�C stu=ov�ccsMr��avr Figure 4.5 2013 PM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes Traffic Impact Study 16 North No Scale Primrose School of Edina t p,, oAMC cruor e<sWANY Figure 4.6 2013 AM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes +0, e07� Sof® Oy yek, S�Pa4 6y Edina Industrial Blvd Traffic Impact Study 17 Primrose School of Edina a,,,q,,,k 6 ttE 101wfroC 61UDY COMPANY Figure 4.7 2413 PM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes Traffic Impact Study 18 A+ No SM19 Primrose School of Edina 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis a. 2013 Level of Service Analysis The LOS results for the 2013 scenario study hours are shown in Table 5.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.1. No improvements are programmed at any of the existing study intersections. The forecast turning movement volumes for each No -Build and Build scenario peak hour were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done in accordance with the 2010 highway Capacity Manual using TRAFFIXTm software, including the existing signal timing plans which were determined upon observation. The complete LOS calculations, which include grades for individual movements, are included in the Appendix. Table 5.1 – 2013 Level of Service (LOS) AM Peak Hour PM s Hour Intersectioneak -W—7(r' SVMetro Blvd C (d) C (d) D (e) D (e) Northern Site Driveway/ A (b) A (a) A (a) A (a) Metro Blvd Southern Site Driveway/ A (b) A (b) A (b) A (b) Metro Blvd Edina Industrial Blvd/ B (c) B (c) C (c) C (c) Metro Blvd 'The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection. The second letter (in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement. The results in Table 5.1 show there is no decease in LOS between the No -Build and Build scenarios, meaning the proposed development will have little impact on the study intersections. All study intersections are forecasted to operate acceptably at LOS D or better for both the a.m. and p.m, peak hours in the 2013 No - Build and Build scenarios. b. Daily Trak Volumes Existing average daily traffic volumes were taken from multiple road segments near the site. These volumes were then forecast for the 2013 No -Build and Build scenarios, which are shown in Table 5.2. As shown in Table 5.2, no road segments near the site are expected to reach capacity through the 2013 Build scenario. Traffic Impart Study 19 Primrose School of Edina Table 5.2 - Daily Traffic Volumes * 2008 Average Annual Dairy I ratric volumes - bource: mnruv i Hail r IVw maga Traffic Impact Study 20 4 Primrose School of Edina Daily DailySeqrnent Road i 13 Volunie Due To 2013Capacity Existing* No -Build Developnient Build W 70th St West of Metro 13,000 9000 9200 100 9300 Blvd W 70th St East of Metro 27,000 18400 18800 300 19100 Blvd Metro Blvd South of W 20,000 6200 6300 400 6700 70th St North of Metro Blvd Edina 8,000 5500 5600 400 6000 Industrial Blvd Edina West of Metro 20,000 8500 8700 200 8900 Industrial Blvd Blvd Edina East of Metro 20,000 10800 11000 300 11300 Industrial Blvd Blvd * 2008 Average Annual Dairy I ratric volumes - bource: mnruv i Hail r IVw maga Traffic Impact Study 20 4 Primrose School of Edina c. Pedes&lans & Bicycles Pedestrian volumes were very low for this area and should not be impacted by the nominal increase in traffic volume. Sidewalks are provided along West 70th Street and portions of Metro Boulevard. No segregated bicycle facilities, trails, or sidewalks exist adjacent to the project site. Given the small footprint of the proposed development, adding a section of sidewalk within the project site adjacent to Metro Boulevard is not recommended. d. Travel Demand Management The intent of a Travel Demand Management Pian is to reduce the amount of single occupant vehicles during rush hour. Since day care customers are dropping off their children on their way to work, travel demand management at the center would have little impact on them. They've already chosen their transportation mode for their primary trip, not the secondary day care trip. Day care center employees typically work through the rush hours and do not impact the rush hour. It is recommended bus schedules for area transit be made available to the center's employees. 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably at Level of Service D or better in 2013 with the addition of traffic from the proposed development. No additional modifications to the existing public transportation system will be needed to accommodate the proposed development. 7. Appendix A. 7401 Metro Boulevard Parking Study B. Traffic Counts C. Capacity Analysis Backup Traffic Impact Study 21 Primrose School of Edina U Sc,k a TME JRAff1C $JUDY COMPANY Traffic and Parking Study One Corporate Circle Edina, MST I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Migliael P. Spack, P.E .T.O.E. MN License No. 40936 Date: May 9, 2011 A5`) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary............................................................................. /1J� 2. Existing Parking data.......................................................................... FYI 3. Parking Forecasts and Analyses........................................................3 4. Conclusions and Recommendations.................................................4 5. Appendix...............................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1 — Location Maps..........................................................................................1 Finure 2 — Existina Parkina Trendline ................. ............................................... 2 Figure 3 -- Factored Parking Trendline for Office Full Occupancy ............................ 3 One Corporate circle i Edina, MN Parking lrnpact Study May 2011 Traffic Impact Study A2 q Primrose School of Edina . I Appendix A - 7401 Metra Boulevard Parking Study 1. Executive Summary a. Background and Purpose Hempel Properties manages One Corporate Circle, a 110,975 gross square foot office complex located at 7401 Metro Boulevard in Edina, MN (see Figure 1). The purpose of this study is to assess the parking feasibility of adding a 11,500 square foot day care center to the northern portion of the site. Figure 1 — Location Maps b. Results If the existing One Corporate Circle building was fully occupied, it is anticipated 266 of the 557 parking spaces would be filled with vehicles during the peak parking period. The proposed day care center footprint will eliminate 65 parking stalls leaving the office building's associated peak parking with 226 vacant parking stalls. At the day care center's peak parking period, which is conservatively being combined to coincide with the office building's peak, the day care center will need 43 parking stalls. Based on the analyses in this study, it is expected peak parking demand would occupy 309 of the 492 available parking stalls after the proposed 11,500 square foot day care center is built on the site. There will continue to be ample parking on the One Corporate Circle site after the day care center is fully operational. One Corliorate Circle Parking brrpact Study Traffic Impact Study A3 t_ Edina, MN May 2011 Primrose School of Edina 2. Existing Parking Data a Data Collectflon Procedure The parking lot was divided into three zones and a visual count was made every half hour to determine how many cars were parked in each of the three zones. A map showing the three zones is included in Appendix A. The first count was started at 8:00 a.m. and the last count was started at 4:30 p.m. Counts were collected on Thursday, May 5, 2011. Data was recorded in 30 minute increments using hand held data collection equipment (Jamar Count Boards). b. Existing Parking Utilization The three zones contain a total of 557 parking stalls. This includes 545 regular stalls and 12 handicap stalls. The most stalls occupied on Thursday, May 5th (197) occurred at 10:30a.m. which represents 35.4% of the available parking. A trendline of the site's parking occupancy for May 5th is shown in Figure 2. Detailed existing parking data by zones and in total is contained in Appendix A. 600 500 400 10 ix bqoo O. I 100 0 4P GA C1 6 0 a r4 '4 .4 —4 4 . 4 --#—Total Capacity --W—Occupicd5/5/11 Figure 2 — Existing Parking Trendline One Corporate Circle Firkin g Inr Igi Study I Traffic paCI Study 2 A4 A -S 2 2 2 E 2 2 2 2 iL 0. nl. 0. 2L 01. CL M 8 0rn 3 0 R C n n.C7 rvl rq rq fr. �* Edina, UN gfyt 2011 Primrose Schoo o Edina 3. Parking Forecasts and Analyses a. Parking with Full Occupancy One Corporate Circle currently has a 22.1% vacancy rate. To be conservative in the assessment of maximum parking needs, we factored the actual counts by 22.1 % plus an additional 5% to allow a "safety factor". Figure 3 shows the factored parking trendline. Factoring the peak demand of 197 parked vehicles results in a maximum of 266 vehicles parked on site, which represents 47.7% of the available parking. Detailed factored parking data by zones and in total is contained in Appendix C. 600 Soo 400 N 300 x L ro O. 200 100 0 pd 4 d d d 4 pdd d a. a M c. d. a app d n. a O M Q M O M O M O M O M O n CT rn 4 M co W M a% 0 N N r! e^1 N N M M 'V Q e-1 r^1 .^i .-1 rq t-1 Notal Capacity Factored 5/5/11 Figure 3 - Factored Parking Trendline for Office Full Occupancy b. Forecast Parking A parking generation analysis was performed for the proposed development based on the methods and rates published in the ITE Parking Generation Manual, Orn Edition. The Manual is a compilation of data collected at existing facilities throughout the United States. The peak parking periods for a day care center (ITE land use code 565) are from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. The peak parking demand on site occurred at 10:30 a.m., which does not coincide with the peak period of the proposed day care center. To be conservative, the peak parking to be generated by the day care center will be aligned with the site's peak. One Corporate Circle 3 Edina, MN Parkin Impact Study A5 May 2011 Traffic Ipadt Study Primrose School 01 Edina . G The 85 l percentile peak period parking demand for a day care center is 3.70 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Using this parking rate results in needing 43 parking stalls for an 11,500 square foot day care center. Of the 557 parking spaces supplied on site, 266 spaces would be expected to be occupied if the site's buildings are fully leased and 65 spaces would be expected to be eliminated to make room for the day care center. This leaves 226 parking spaces vacant to be used by the day care center. 4. Conclusions and Recommendations If the existing One Corporate Circle buildings were fully occupied, it is anticipated 266 of the 557 parking spaces would be filled with vehicles during the peak parking period. The proposed day care center footprint will eliminate 65 parking stalls leaving the office building's associated peak parking with 226 vacant parking stalls. At the day care center's peak parking period, which is conservatively being combined to coincide with the office building's peak, the day care center will need 43 parking stalls. Based on the analyses in this study, it is expected peak parking demand would occupy 309 of the 492 available parking stalls after the proposed 11,500 square foot day care center is built on the site. There will continue to be ample parking on the One Corporate Circle site after the day care center is fully operational. 6. Appendix A. Existing Parking Capacity and Occupancy B. Factored Parking Capacity and Occupancy One Corporate Circle 4 Gcllna, MN Parkin Impact Strrrly May 20111 Traffic I pla" Study A6 Primrose School R Edina Appendix A - 7409 Metro Boulevard Parking Study Appendix A Existing Parking Capacity and Occupancy 1 ",Owe Oka. • ."w r ,t Oka / t / Zone 2 ,( l: NO Zone 1 One Corporate Circle Parking Zones One Corporate Circle S T'a'lon Ir» act S"' TraKc I�ipar.t�StudyA7 0 I'Mina, MN M y 2011 Primrose School 01 Edina CTiT" Ear%$ting Parking Capacity and Occupancy Corporate Circle Raw Parking Data: Thursday_ - May 6, 2 9aay�'y`q. ,yppy ,' 3hP•_} 8:00 AM 41 gyp■ . �:A6'h 49 y% �$n,Ap� %%�"{1 ^�r�9 IInk�R/„'�s 1 91 ji�}(y� k """""ibd,.. 16.3 8:30 AM 60 65 1 126 22.6 9:00 AM 78 75 1 154 27.6 9:30 AM 90 86 1 177 31.8 10:00 AM 102 88 1 191 34.3 10:30 AM 103 93 1 197 35.4 11:00 AM 105 90 1 196 35.2 11:30 AM 104 87 1 192 34.S 12:00 PM 98 87 2 187 33.6 12:30 PM 93 81 2 1 176 31.6 1:00 PM 94 84 1 179 32.1 1:30 PM 90 76 1 167 30.0 2:00 PM 97 74 1 172 30.9 2:30 PM 102 86 0 188 33.8 3:00 PM 94 80 0 174 31.2 3:30 PM 86 72 0 1S8 28.4 4:00 PM 73 S9 0 132 23.7 4:30 PM 62 1 52 0 114 20.5 CAPACITY 1 287 1 205 65 557 D11 One Corporate Circle 6 Edina, MIN/ 1'arkipl� In act Study C 020 1 TrafCa linpadt Study A8 Primrose School o Edina Appendix A - 7401 Metro Boulevard Parking Study Factored Parking Capacity and Occupancy One Corporate Circle Factored P rking Data: Thursda - May 5 2011 Y Md - 3 E) 4. E 8:00 AM 41 49 1 91 16.3 123 22.0 8:30 AM 60 65 1 1 126 22.6 170 30.5 9:00 AM 78 75 1 154 27.6 208 37.3 9:30 AM 90 86 1 177 31.8 239 42.8 10:00 AM 102 88 1 191 34.3 257 46.2 10:30 AM 1 103 93 1 197 1 35.4 266 47.7 11:00 AM 105 90 1 196 35.2 264 47.4 11:30 AM 104 87 1 192 34.5 259 46.5 12:00 PM 98 87 2 187 33.6 2S2 45.3 1230 PM 93 81 2 176 31.6 1 237 42.6 1:00 PM 94 84 1 179 32.1 241 43.3 1:30 PM 90 76 1 167 30.0 225 40.4 2:00 PM 97 74 1 172 30.9 232 41.6 2:30 PM 1 102 86 0 188 1 33.8 253 45.5 3:00 PM 94 80 0 174 31.2 235 42.1 3:30 PM 86 72 0 158 28.4 213 38.2 4:00 PM 73 59 0 132 23.7 178 1 31.9 4:30 PM 62 1 52 1 0 114 20.5 154 1 27.6 CAPACITY 1 287 1 205 1 65 1 557 1 1 FACTOR 1.348 Otte Corporate Circle 7 Edina, MN Parki►t atiffw l.Srudy M�tY 2gII Trak I ipaCt Study A9 y4 o Primrose School o1 Edina PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 11, 2012 2011.015.11a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Refined, LLC is proposing to subdivide the property at 6109 Oaklawn Avenue into two lots. (See property location on pages Al—A5.) The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A6—A11.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,699 and 6,693 square feet. Both lots would gain access off Oaklawn Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,701 square feet, median lot depth is 133 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. (See attached median calculations on page Al 2.) The new lots would meet the median width and depth, but would be just short of the median area. Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low- density residential. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a single-family home and detached garage. (See pages A4 and A5.) Both the home and garage would be removed. Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single -dwelling residential R-1, Single -dwelling district * Variance Required Grading/Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally acceptable. (See memo from the city engineer on page A15.) All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Oaklawn. All sump pump drains shall drain into the existing sump pump drain tile along Oaklawn Avenue. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired, The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. Specific hook-up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. Primary issue • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met with this proposal. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? 2 Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 9,000 s.f. 75 ft 133 ft. Lot 1 6,699 s. f. * 50 ft* 133 ft. Lot 2 6,693 s. f. * 50 ft* 133 ft. * Variance Required Grading/Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally acceptable. (See memo from the city engineer on page A15.) All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Oaklawn. All sump pump drains shall drain into the existing sump pump drain tile along Oaklawn Avenue. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired, The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. Specific hook-up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. Primary issue • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met with this proposal. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? 2 Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is due to the fact that the subject property is double the size of all lots on this block. This area was originally plated with 50 -foot lots, including the subject property. (See page A13.) The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood and original plat. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of his property of which the lots would be the same as existing lots in the area. As demonstrated on page Al2, the median lot size in this neighborhood is 50 feet wide, 133 feet deep and 6,701 square feet in size. The proposed lots would be 50 feet wide, 133 feet deep and 6,699 and 6,693 square feet in size, which nearly meet the medians. The City of Edina has also granted similar variances within this area. In 2009, a similar subdivision and variances were granted at 5920 and 5924 Oaklawn, and in 2011 at 5829 Brookview Avenue. To deny the subject variances would deny the applicant a subdivision that has been recently approved by the City. (See approved subdivisions on page A14.) b) There are circumstances that are unique to the properly, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to Oaklawn Avenue. The vast majority of the lots on Oaklawn are 50 feet wide and 6,700 square feet in size. The circumstance of the oversized lot was not created by the applicant. c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The neighborhood includes a vast majority of single-family homes on 50 -foot lots as proposed. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 6109 Oaklawn Avenue and the lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,699 and 6,693 square feet. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width and depth and nearly meet the median area. 3. The proposal would restore the property back to the form of the original plat, which included two lots. 4. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. if the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, a 50 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. In addition, the applicant would be denied a subdivision with variances that has been previously approved by the City in two instances in the last two years. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 4 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. d. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Oaklawn. All sump pump drains shall drain into the existing sump pump drain tile along Oaklawn Avenue. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Deadline for a City Decision; March 20, 2012 5 2 City of Edina al4ar ra.aas fyrfrR)a s{fr.srrd are+ 71 f�aatr+ root �+� L6 ^� INpbtipbwdaadabws gals rale 'oaf stir_;iw arx,..9iN adau! ue4xn 41, bled lax taro 4:u'ast'"�ia alta inaaisr±lP12 , „rt. { 1�!??a Laa�aJ_;ua t ofd 1 haw 1 4120 { M" 1 ,tRti 1 seal— ; s„;2912 sim-sil' WIMO0 }oat sada awl Mae, Mal saw Saar ,,,. got sw WI "Of SMI stn Mali sad Mal s03 Mal so" `^� RSR 9121 Mel sees S0°a Na!M f,Mt x!S!R a�aa sas nada sae Sad seat — _ +1ad9 SagR salt ! am 1 11!12 + salt beta data }alt sat? Haid lila 3x11 stir do + tab /'�.� am ,Sal" adti Gera Mir all, � $ett "It axtt lus utr ufa UNit !Ma 1 a" Z Nle Mal SAM sit! data Mal Ra1q Sett ;,xq s4M5#21 Mix rf '2 se ,,,, s4x3 "is dor+uta ndrtds Nambsr Label. Smoot Nus" Label* .l City Lw lw ,n,,f Cnt1u trkr t4a11loa El Na4 ta.S418 Hart Nta RaN ur" .Nor ad)S sora NM sdtd � SSM url 36 as tare Saar wN rd 100 'L.rJ Mlaax sail"td uta Sat) Rota ")a Slay lana >• Nat Sex? 545: ter "to iw0 N10Nuaaxe aNar Lek*% t3a4" deaf url Nor aaN seas Sift Hata slit lead ada ua112PaAd sd't MO eut sada 3041 1624 Mal $641 MO Sear SAN t1 nN1N'Ssalt la4R la44 7NN4 N4S �(sstd uqrjna]a ® Parcels,Sada 8904 a"of M d sadr lead Slat lsa }Pat Moa asst som ta/v sgk5 Adel SSW SSp; sal 353 Mao SPPR am 3901 Salt i}R��d°N )1N/a Nrl °of 1,°0°sal3801 1,!d" tea" y99Plaad ssao slat "Is Sat) 39os Sett dila sett Sara Silt NSaw r; 1WI3 elf Bala at Mta Sall SSte alfa s48a solfuts ttst" xSu )P 1,A Sqt tS9x talo 1,4// 9Std lade u21 SS" 4 Mi $Por 50" aPlt sate � 9931 0930 alsin lenPlr �Saia�SN+ ,YT rR SPrn Sir! so)$ "aa lets Mo $PN lets 5aff Slixa RS)P SSM data !1,M We > SPM !!M bolo Nfr, yiS; N Rao wo Sot) }at SPaa M7x SSA 1,P)) solea 3f Yla 80.77 R!N $9at "M 5931 mu salt Mas sA4R Rel 99tr tar 4ePo . ae'o aRlr nam ""'f 50,10 024 r:$ " 4qM. iau RMS 544 awl "it 1,w! 5w1 .....1 Zswl sera `�9new Saar trot r sadiaag9 Seal dept gGplaada 4 Salo dear aaa0 Stir1ia� . am deal does laC4 etas saw aPBR soca! debt as 1,w 5975 Sill note t4441Ca7 atl0! 1,/r art 0012 t naY ! dab ia0i IODR YON dote dtSM 0011 ata sort tri#* 3340 llfneatW— ) Wt) err aYa 08@ alt aT9 deal den ba0 appy e@12 do:s a" 003 1,N N )w1 »fs t -- sill! �egra afi deSIam _ ti mm Mrd 1 Sols aft alS aM 6012 axn dell ae1° ewr wn dcaa ata! tl l9td text eoal"�2o ata eat Nae at l SON 001 aM 60t ate awl atr 4"is It ° pee tie aaa`aca' 90Y3 6641 am 4074 6wS SM4 talo 1044 LUIl .' ata pi�201 1 11, 1,M 0414 alt ""' N Igtd („ al slot tier diet itoo 589 died_ Lsbi1�4 a6M AyAVrs 54 sof uW� 394 4101 Of 0101 Uw HOs i9 -'�t^+J f 40tH drw arm 10 1 is t `00N faf IS 0 Strt alta afar afN l-` cede` Mia (a lest 1108 6id1 Solo s,tf acrd 0111 ata YO' srM dox site Sr)r II snr ItA !Oa sl®S do" site tlns 0911 u uta sopa "Id 11» din 1,r" lids deal N Vid— -L. � ant».. un sit a„ +w 441 ew arae ata) dial eels alit ` t 11. 'V alta star aua ar)r d a341rq 1d11fMngq grti Nit !u of m �jej 0244 aV4e IMS ata_ sell dna Witt r1,' - uta 0t4S dial doe) drN� 'ar-,am 'ar°rad onestro' -11 1, 'an 1,4` try dare �� N loafs 1aa79Y dlnau"4ra 41g14p1t 1 alas ° Sas army Jit stat 1,4 { 4ktrrgP eMo SWC OxgPii#04Iti' 4Mt r3o rn04rit7rtT trot ° + + a2YR 4Rtlf 4rrx u. 4ii. 4712 4N44tat ( nrfl eel ° 0 x211 Mi �eirx lrrf,'ifd 4412 r4 1,)4 Ni tib 1,N SiiJ 1211 a7 s alt7 iaol air 170S4S0t �d)234241 4240 axe p atR arlf all" lila ima ler) {!112'1 err etas arta aaaR "' star 4xtt Solo Sita Stu M axx! 517 1,N N >t.�tOJ iN! 317 2� 4=1, Sala peal i,- / M1R'iI, br15 6"1 Taal alta aril > 571 6]N 01221:;"" j44x5 saes f .. 4:)941" 47x112106)40 aatdf NW F u1s arur air drGO 570!SMS '384 f i Oita 'Sal tar i k}.dad > naeu" ata aaOR dNo S sadOMd_.__rrxaassqOHl Nfa � j Saw ataR aaR awedaN404 PTD: 1902824430105 4 p r 8109 Oakiawn Ave p " 4.. Edina, MN 55424v �, .511 �'•�nrt�t�t.lrs�'� 2 m City of Edina #le! La na M1YMkIMad flavin }401 low Dm0 -98W,51111- SdOd fmf saw SAbt SH! fM1 SHa Dana SO "}f11 si4r SOH SMa fD00 nod ga9r -ms-,.w4- $40-so bA4a Sml favi sedr t sms sm1 ffd5 SleD r w r— SHI 3tPq Nowa M—W, Lab k 11"M fNMD UWIS 50t4 Ik HIT bAlt Sa1T Sats M1fi }All 0.N jmg� ,all C11f Umfb }411 sole < Sa7t' sale SSS�� A610 9!m Satz Hm @ aeti' i Sett 5514 1404 r,' Creaks 5511 N11 H73 ML SA7a` Hla Sd7t NJt p 3575 fol! Ht5 Sal} Sdle D4N Dela Silo 44 5519 fAla • laN� $At# ® UMd Wmaa D5]] Sa]1 1337 5572 31)] 5492 Sell' SDN N]1 3a91 ^� i 3 Ulad 1477 >OM Da]J Sam slj7 Sam SD77 Hoa Sd3T s19/ S#11 r ® P6fka fut Sato 5411 5AM 5411 glm 5,43I 1640 sel0 edtl Parca16 Sall AA1/ SltS' AD/t Ddlf SOH gd15 ;3 Hrd HSN 57w DDM 5144 flet HdO Sa01 Sled Sa01 3305 i HP5 SDOi `fDd3 SDM ;D93 }501 SD53 g94t j SHS 1301 sellHir 3408 flW9 f}0! -sell-5501 SaaD S9N 196D S5H 'H77" _.f.��..,,.�.,." lI Fq 11 gat] Aofl 43f7 SOH 5177 Sa ib - s6t7 -f url stle'Soft- 'HI! S47! SAID DD!! dem JDJI DDm " jam Allx fSlfj 1511 Htj Ha Sax3 }All 557M1 s 71 .41 DDle Hr HI4 3!N f4N DDJ! t Sale DD741 ! Sold }ell H3J So2J 3516 51)9 D!]x Sol] Se)! i 310 5511 mg H17 safe 5110 sab Hn Htt aD9A SD1a' sa]T H1I Serf SdW ; sau 4915 Sa1d adia 5911 sflS belt Dei! $444 i f Df1D �" sndl Age IN af}40 Hof WW Seat 5tH fddl aaW +ml Pleb asst 5056 Hat 400g 606! f003 ada 6006 iaeg 4990 Now #Dae beta y !0H 4000 4019 Hoa 645! HIT 0017 60t4 1819 0017 4017 dale S!m 4021 1002 den H024021 WM `6011 '1120. N a!t) aBta H1) 6014 5075 40x0 0024 60!! HH 44N 4014 fare a HO/ Btltt 1115 f4t( Hm QOrJ' a0r1 "it 6014 6611 doll 6012 Hltl .... ....."...,; tlOH r. 4621 601! 1011 OO1S am "Of deadl am 601# "M 405/ 691! 401! `'Y boli am 601! 60N141111 a !for 6000 6101 QID1 �lldfT{6100 (yp6 ppfy�i} Sale 2i 71 4M A'to ft04 4f0S 4101 (d1� 4104 j No At" 6104 ,too `41 Do ; HN 'w} 4fdl +100 4f" 4111 61,6 6111 Gil) 61:J dtl# H,] 1211 60th Z' 6117 ,.�...- ---�- :fm ata elle dlm dla ` I'll, 4105 4125 4121 6123 ` 1116 bfle 4475 file 4116 itm ffH J# INS 4116 45)1 -at)?' bill 6113 6111 Old � gglJ bfm 01U bfm di]7 tet111t1 a/br aril #ild 4lr71tH 1111 ilOD ifm rr wxb ,add afu and eul '� F, +..««r..a.ssa c+rw Ktw-awwa u K13 mdf A. PID:1902824430105 r V Vww � " 6108 Oakiawn Ave, O ''� `�• 4• Edina, MN 55424 � • �t41'iH�G�'Jatx4Y� m City of Edina 0017 0011 dolt.. HI/MIJj11M0 (YaMWO . .. «.» „. � Nouda NamMt LaM9a Il OOlb 6011 F614 {troth Name LAW* ,. .J CNy Lwts f• "if &176 6dl! 110041 211 11024 067} 4024 ® Lakd Ndlaed 2g dill 6024 to" 0 parka 6042 mm 11012 .P. 6411 60J2 0 Parcefa Jt M1s 6072 do14 60JI dddMMAkliF 1144! 40+4 �� Will 6011 ! dolt do4J 918781119 6141 Ot00 6161 1106 8101 4146 dlw Was 6144 ..m.,.,,,...... dib/ `s slog 1 _ OIM 6id9. 6104 1 dt6i..... e #. MI sit) 4114 611) 4112 p# i .,,. .».,.... slid dill 6116 . — sill 0179 dill ,m s1Y0 bt21 6120 Q ............. #+} dill dill Otis 6104 6t7S 0416 dllg 6120 6126 6179 6179 4414 dill .111 dill 6121 MI 4104 dill 6iJ0 OtJl 6111 0141 t�� 442} y^ �Y1�, 4404 dt4S 1114/ 11147 01Nb S7 W 74 1115, f106 tf sl1J u..—i rieA'All C,4Y tf t.:Q4SCA�4 �-! Pza:190282443010S e Y �.�"' e`.. ', Kti? .a 6109 Oakiawn Ave +•' Edina, MN SS424 `'� AM City of Edina topold House tammher Labels street fluor Label. qq Umlh �.� ltteka Lek. Ram•$ LJ Perk. 6 eloir .Ills' 0 Parcels 2M Aerial Photo ei tdl of floe t eIi NN til0 dl1 W vwM�nhafri tw ^tf UP',va4e rr+ t A. PID:1902824430105 a 6109 Oaklawn Ave , d Edina, MN 55424 AM Irl/{ R RIFT IVF November 23, 2011 61019 Oaklawn Avenue -Subdivision Description of Intended Use REFINED, LLC is a residential homebuilding firm specializing in new home construction in existing neighborhoods. The majority of our business is done within the City of Edina, where we enjoy a strong working relationship with the City and our neighbors. REFINED's intentions are to return the subject property to the originally platted/intended use (two home -sites) via the subdivision process. When completed, these two sites will again match all the other properties on the block. We then intend to build two new homes per City ordinances. REFINED plans to be the General Contractor for both of the new homes; it is not our goal to receive subdivision approval and then sell the lots to another builder for construction. Currently our plan is to find two clients that would like to build custom homes for their families; we have no current plans to build the homes on "Spec". We believe the City should approve this request for the following reasons: 1. All of the homes on the 6100 block of Oaklawn Avenue are on similar size lots to our proposal. 2. The subdivision shall in no way diminish the natural streetscape of the Oaklawn Avenue or negatively change the overall feel of the neighborhood as a whole. Conversely, without subdivision, a single new home could be built within current City ordinances, and if constructed it could be much larger than neighboring homes and therefore would result in a diminished streetscape and would likely affect the overall neighborhood aesthetic. 3. The vast majority of the homes in the neighborhood are built on lots sized very similar to our request. 4. The City has recently approved a similar subdivision request at 5920/5924 Oaklawn Avenue. 5. The City has recently approved a similar subdivision request at 5829 Brookview Avenue. 113 . . . . . . ... . . ys . . '.4AV "MYO 0 pill co z pill co z —=w 33 V NMV7YVO Pq grrarxaucw. x .cr�acwro,rs rrwnn.sm.+.wss)o.. 7 3. fl»arr.rrgree. .rs.r .us.�artrn.aavm w currnc�a,. +an a+e..asa Gopliff Sus One CA }b a•----v,.o- a V �,,� tF^,ausruHemrev ' iz P� 0- i C ��o � rurw a+cvc •� crrws c mwtiu<.c.:rA ....,....a .....a.....-- �-.r �, � — GPAD7MG. DRAINAGE. UTK ffY AND TREE vuw Refined, LLC NOTES: _ GRADNG, DMNAGE. U nUTY AND TREE PLN ANNABELLE ADDITION Rerw ed, LLC sizaw. toj.wm Emu. eaY s7+�s,!xa {SR'�d.AnUr ,rte. >ra.ea� ti� i leprcy 5rmtb r leas I Rdew Atod Ard&'Sm ft Al JAMA) I%Nr 6112 OAW *n Awa. I 6106 Or:4nn Awe, f 6104 0AWrii Avis. � 6l O0 OA Awn Ali Cork OAKLAWN AVE --s.-..»«s--a-_„i,,...-s..--,1,....-y f ---f--.^'+ ,^'ks--s-^--a---••-+---s----s---s.........9'1�KTarst+ry�"Wgv-s.-�...,.y----s---- --- e_ irli ylli - VM __. lyy IY{I �T y illi pll --- IW W/iOr nJIA n4 — YU py NM /V g N 00°10'28” W 100.00 77.7 w 177777 is „, 1 • p • f 1 1 Y Y�nl 1 +i a 1 ti 1 w 2 a / ►f 219 j� i �' to it z f 1 o (y r. q n fia 1 • 1 ,8 1 f I qg bo 1 ' f ' • '141 1 f f q ie ,n 1 � 'r1 t.• a•/ r � J if r � �� m 1 i A 1 p i 100.00 S 00°09'28" E '^ ownGrr f Ownen• / f 1 Gtnsr, f Oaten C+ra/ 64mWluelf 3luion lie gg� f w+rJwn lsndwm ran f sm Ma 6112 A-pokmlw Ave. f 6I06 C4natvlew Alm f 6104 Oraokrew Am. i 6/00 8i Vklt � F r Dwruv: � ¢H.rerr JeNrny 9tae8nd^ (eon 0 Reb4=0 !'L-► 6 t 12 OJlbHn At». � 61009 OJJ:IJIwf Ain. f �y ow"dr7 P^sd Ar.W* 1 ft N 6104 0AWw" AMm, tTener+ .IalnmJ hoar 6/Ot7 t7aWntt Aw. �` Corti ViiKLA WN it VE. 9" 4p' RYNJry lG Wv.�-.,..,,,.. W1Y .�.,..,.,..m,. WV NN 'nY .-........ wN W'1f i t NmJ l n ti4M wN .-,. i ur N 00'10'28"W 100.00 (undrr rArd Cerinwhlel 611211rad►aewAve. 1 1 I \ 1 i 1 I I 1 t i 1 50.00 � o waer: :1hJrra� a's 6 04Lir -,.Aw. S i UU.IN S 00'09'26" E pamm� WXkam 1/u+d fren 6104 broatvrJwAw. f f ♦ I. t` h. I � i AM O&W, ram i :Jud Mower 6100 Drvwkwaw Aw ,I x Jeffrey 5wabner 6112 OA/#w Am. amara !ern # Rebd"4 reek 6146 OJNMwn Ahn. Curb OMW- VAod Anderaon U Al C104 OJkMwn Ave. OAKLA WN AVE owner.. .MOWS Durr 6100 OA4*n Avo. hM WY --- WY r✓lil - N4 hM -- WY --^^ NY— 'Ii4 Z "IV Owme 4`i -W C:Al" Chwq 6112 &wh-ew Ave, N nn*in,gA» w inn -nn I - . i (Awwj rom 1900 Mchor 61 OO 8nvA uw Aw. I� [p�nnn� g�� 61 G6 Wca ., Ave. 6144 f wAwew Ave, l l 1 S� i 77 9.0'/ I� W _ I4 ,I z. ' m R V (Awwj rom 1900 Mchor 61 OO 8nvA uw Aw. [p�nnn� g�� 61 G6 Wca ., Ave. 6144 f wAwew Ave, l l (Awwj rom 1900 Mchor 61 OO 8nvA uw Aw. 9 "f- r42 94 eN Mt .4 (4 '6" 4 ' 104, 104, or4 " Now, 41 W4 1 '1101 A N In {til lil iR OKVHW AVE 0 0-4 0 0 tiS "'"f cl a Q 04 M 04 rI IW It #4 A q4 vq 14 td to, v In 4M G -4 V, 0 0 0 m N m In v q4 VA rl #4 94 VI #4 V4 40 ka %a hn w 0 U2 w ka in , I - [ IT OAKLAWN AVE PY lo' -0 0 ? a* ri 'jo 0 ' -f 0*' a Cl 0 *4 04 04 ^IN m m a p4 rf t" A w4 1-4 A P4 #4 #4 OF ko 0 0 "ka"ID lo, W, 40 1 %D I W I ID W w -.!r U, 0 m 1% M N Ch *4, 1.1 in m fn r % iA ch m 11 M m OTI a 0 0 A "I N N M .1 04 "1 Ip %0 kho ko i0 40 W w U2 0. K LLO AVE F4 om 0 H F4 N m m 0 V4 .i-4 14 4i C1 a r4 M 0000000 0 a 0 0 rl o0wo.wow ko w 0 P4 W1, 0 N 1' 4., tn Q o V4 Hfy -A N M M 14 000 00000 ka Sia, 40 is ID W tO $0 %01 W 113 ko' m z 0 Jill oil 'i 9 "f- r42 94 eN Mt .4 (4 '6" 4 ' 104, 104, or4 " Now, 41 W4 1 '1101 A N In {til lil iR OKVHW AVE 0 0-4 0 0 tiS "'"f cl a Q 04 M 04 rI IW It #4 A q4 vq 14 td to, v In 4M G -4 V, 0 0 0 m N m In v q4 VA rl #4 94 VI #4 V4 40 ka %a hn w 0 U2 w ka in , I - [ IT OAKLAWN AVE PY lo' -0 0 ? a* ri 'jo 0 ' -f 0*' a Cl 0 *4 04 04 ^IN m m a p4 rf t" A w4 1-4 A P4 #4 #4 OF ko 0 0 "ka"ID lo, W, 40 1 %D I W I ID W w -.!r U, 0 m 1% M N Ch *4, 1.1 in m fn r % iA ch m 11 M m OTI a 0 0 A "I N N M .1 04 "1 Ip %0 kho ko i0 40 W w U2 0. K LLO AVE F4 om 0 H F4 N m m 0 V4 .i-4 14 4i C1 a r4 M 0000000 0 a 0 0 rl o0wo.wow ko w 0 P4 W1, 0 N 1' 4., tn Q o V4 Hfy -A N M M 14 000 00000 ka Sia, 40 is ID W tO $0 %01 W 113 ko' m This is not a legally recorded map. It represents a compilation of information and data from city, county and other sources. Z00 alp Feet Print Date: Fri Jul 12 08:42:04 2009 S.112 SE. 114 SEC. 19 T. 028 R.24 Eighth uartertSection City of Edina leap Nps, afa0 JNI #Na NFf 310s, Siii slpo NN swl '°®""'� sroo i' �-� Itpnlgni�a�raw. Hang W..0 r1. NIN 3161 #Ni aN+ Qi1D Sm Np1 SIp# JNJ Jaar Siw N» „,� JJ01f Nal HJi -.-H -'I alis --- N Seem Nwo Lewis Nt# fell- NIA N!i NPJ N/l ai! Ni3 N/r # Nif � N17 elft sa» aaf Nt7 'Jif! NY7 NIt Nti �! Cns,M NUF � 11111117 -0F3S. SI» NA pop Arty Less, Naatl N» St» � fYJ1 #� k N» tI» si7e i11f eF SJFF eft! N11 LaAN N]T JiJ7 t-Sur- NUI #WJ at1J t� Jf» fil7 NN S7JJ 3p37 Nil alis at7F N]t ?i]# NJ] SII» 9400 F tMe asN aNt .suo' sSJr NM Sua sltpl #ur eluNnmsrw NN SNJ SDI# 6111 NN JIN JIJI ftJJ Stlt 3404- ,� 5l1i � N#!ITbNONDOrIN! S/JD]NIaJ3716J1WJI DaqDH3fJN/J NIINli lfN17a EffJ p »N FA�dam rf:s. I L�Awm JDI"N»NNidNtD♦/>sN» Alp]t8NJ3ait37IHJtt7!smsa/r#Np �S aJM fN lNf SpN N» q03 aaei wtr WOV Noo sDFI spN Iaoi Jptp wa -"ft- eaaJ use war MR#. fw7 SMfOJs w0/ Ai0! JJN rr iWp N/r wu Ds� IDN woi alis Boor 1> wr wa wrs Na Sellwtl Nf3 N11 610341 - taTa N» NJY N» N» 6aN 4mN/J FJ lNJ Nf7 wit Nr7 don-rem FIMN#TN]Jw3JNAI N» Q07teoNNJi fa»wiziptiNta i �3NM NW sols 1�,:. fain NJa w» ?r f ftpl MOP At s talc N ON POW 0 NFr 17N JNN i fiDi lot flat 1ifAt t/fi pIW DIN ,i N J Mw rn III trn t visa arr7 � at/# _..... aul er» uJf NJf » am t tf 1 1N t1» il3J "f» f17f ftPMSTW lila N JDN Nf $3 llt NJt Mti ft13 MiA ff» t1J7 pJim Nt3 ml- drl3 J/» 1INJ fl Itis fie IIN 11 J ti ASM Jb1 i1N D1M iltt UaurN`eM.snKI1A6Dbitb! MN 55424 Mie J70tl�1 J JN3 P113:1902924430105 M 6109 Oak9awn Avec Edina, MN 55424 Cf,9fr'�s{'}e e �� MEMORANDUM - Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: January 5, 2012 TO: Cary Teague - City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle - Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Annabelle Addition - Preliminary Plat 6109 Oaklawn Avenue Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: I . A Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit will be required. 2. All storm water from the proposed homes, driveways, and westerly half of the lots shall drain to Oaklawn Avenue. All sump pump drains shall drain into the existing sump pump drain the along Oaklawn Avenue. 3. Any disturbance to the roadway shall be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and the from saw -cut to saw -cut. A. Staff recommends that this site incorporate a construction management plan for the construction of the homes. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the plans that are submitted for building permits. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks G 0AAAOM WOMM1EXTERNAUGENERA4 CORR BY STREETSIO Streets5010B 9aklswn Ave120120105 review of 6109 Onklawn Avenue dm Cary Teague Subject: FW: [FWD: Subdivision of Annabelle Addition/6109 Oaklawn[ Attachments: image001.png Andy- Thank you for your time on the phone. My husband and I are the homeowners at 5117 Oaklawn. We wanted to voice Qur aRRrovall for the subdivision of the two lots at 5109 Qaklawn. We and many of our neighbors have been doing a lot of renovating and updating on our homes. We would like to see the neighborhood continue to be revitalized. There is currently a rental house in between us and the lots you are buying. We would not like to see additional rental homes or any vacated homes on the block. It is our hope that you plan to build two reasonable sized (50 ft lots) owner occupied homes. We know of several young couples looking in the area for homes in the Edina school district. Sincerely, Jenny Williams Nelson Sales 7125 Amundson Ave, Edina, MN 5-A39 o e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 11, 2012 2011.017.11a Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Mr. James Zavoral is requesting to shift the existing lot lines that divide his property at 5239 Highwood Drive, from 6008 and 6000 Pine Grove Road. (See the property location on pages Al—A5.) There is no new lot being created with the request, it is simply a shift in the rear lot lines to sell land to the adjacent property owners. The 6000 Pine Grove Road lot would gain additional land on Mirror Lake. The 5239 Highwood Drive lot would no longer own property abutting Mirror Lake, but would retain a private easement for access to the lake. The drainage and utility easement adjacent to Mirror Lake would remain. (See the proposed lot divison on pages A6—A8.) Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land uses are all single-family homes zoned and guided low- density residential. (See pages A3—A5.) Existing Site Features Each lot contains a single-family residential home. There are no alterations planned for any of the homes. The three lots are generally oversized compared to other lots in the neighborhood. Total land area of the three lots is 184,853 square feet or 4.2 acres. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-density residential Zoning: R-1, Single-family residential Primary Issue Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. The resulting lot fine shift does not create an additional lot. The three lots are all oversized when compared to the neighborhood. (See page A2.) As demonstrated below, with the exception of the 6008 Pine Grove lot width, the proposed lots would still meet the minimum lot size requirements in the R-1 Zoning District. The lot width of 6008 Pine Grove is an existing nonconforming condition, and would not change as a result of the lot division. Minimum Lot Requirements Existing 5239 Hi hwood Existing 6008 Pine Grove Existing 6000 Pine Grove Proposed 5239 Hi hwood Proposed 6008 Pine Grove Proposed 6000 Pine Grove Lot Area -19 369 s.f. 73,266 s.f. 34,481 s.f. 77,106 s.f. 35 481 s.f. 40.921 s.f. 108 451 s.f. Lot width -120 feet 181 feet 95 feet" 200 feet 181 feet 95 feet" 200 feet Lot Depth -135 feet 480 feet 320 feet 326 feet 320 feet 355 feet 515 feet *existing nonconforming condition Any new construction on these new lots would be subject to conformance with all of the City's rules and regulations regarding lot coverage, building height, setbacks and curb cuts. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 6239 Highwood Drive, 6008 Pine Grove Road and 6000 Pine Grove Road. Approval is subject to the following findings:. 1. The existing and proposed lots meet all minimum lot size requirements. 2. The three lots involved in the lot division are larger than most lots within the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. All building activity on either lot must comply with all minimum zoning ordinance standards. Deadline for a city decision. March 28, 2012 2 City of Edina L*GNW }P�t Srl1 srYj,.^—. I"U" mmommet Walk l6Mt%will totals - t Satz } $am .• N 1740 ./ Cly LMOAs ., ate SM 1007 W73 '5101Na S1404 Mat 6web Lou Mo las MA r d7J1 7PS� �roa 116a `� a.. Ir if 91da Sit$ loll 5100 uUat t"'3 Pap }ti] NM Sir? Ya '.Alt Saab 1-.. st6a 5115 Slra Stti El P6rz.6k S61a 9t tl loll .111 lit3 i � ittt 5170 soft$$ 6.�.i.a, 6 7f77 attSo SASt its N sr7 5111 brit .: sr16 slt5' ail Sisr \ Sm 6110 Of as 77W sant2! .` aide s11N Stl0 safe }ar.`M 102 502 t �srY}va. Vt till a 1196106610I6f0a le tt]4 71J1lSm 6215A.-67111 AN]9 60W ,y "37N S1Ji Still `a !ttf '�l]M67 SNt1 ;}p} 9701 i1m SJ00 ' N tA.» -> :aa 37N 5771 sn1 SJIl sIM r 57 3511 }Mt 118513adp_: 1709 11eJ 116 !JOU i stag s9ir slay 11A sJ1S 87ad- _ "1-•. s2r6 bila OirY O761I aJN SMJ 7798 377A 3172 5116 _ !00 a70t '�S166 !ll]SAOa 5K6 SNI 5900 5101 S1d11 ai111 !NO SJOI _ S.kYS S)a1 SXsi S76f 711: Sial S7a1 .,,. Sm 1707 A1C! }11i 5755 l7r lift lila b30S 3X6 SNb ita SIOS 5Nd 5860 S7i] 57N a]a "Is SN6 8]78 — SJtlL s7f/ }717 531a 5217 SIt2 Jilt Sill 11010 a0ltb 6060 S90a 5501 4100 6lN hart 11170 SIJa N71 !Jia SJ IS L-. 5400 Sm }16S.sSaI 1007 6217 6" I'm 6xv 54613W tl Wlr Nlr d0/l ....... 3404 SIDS }bra 84a SSaSYN SIN sAOd Salle 61(11 '? 6776 SIO! 3101 6UU4 6619 MOS 511 5419 9171s a—1 IA 6101 171� .5701 }i61 sw f�yyB77fpt!9p r— �� 8301 SSW !tai Jos tit] l4t9 Saye N7/ ' Y6 6771 ala 0701 6106 }ASI 6119!11 MN N24 N 3100 3N1! 7 til ssN 110.1 SSN S7M J L S7M 711 67tY D!?O2 94 SS00 93011 831111 sD08 esu 1- SSN ane 11170 111 bIN H 61 60/114019'aaN U13 F!/S 11511 ua) 5553 SSIb 8311 ASt7 7517 Silt SL1 Yl114 67/76--T 0 701 a�36166 {7 WI 5311 u1J X11 65/2 $551 SS�I!!ta 117111117 6117 a 6091661! 60N a0Usm ett5 btl2 ma a1tf i---.�1_._.� 1001 }}It 3570 uj1 5591 6176 6371 42H 112 111 6101 tf00 aOt660tt -FIN am !SOI A3a6 SS1J i}N tt1A l_1 1 ( 1 6 1 I 1 6)11 load 4JU 4110 4f1lbr618 Ott 6001/1005 $Si0 S5093A04 $311 b!L 5311 6f61,.J.-*---�-�-� = iltt 'HW 3310 977 SSN 5570 -BSN 1555 lS15 J. » 5819 SS71 }}la ay» 115711 }S99 "MI!ri ,!H !!1Y 11}111 "8111 Nn SW�J 6}]J bS]t ASt7 1_ 64/ 4m Sb/ 11020601/1 WN j Aifis i 6011 felt 06W� � SStS .i.—i n, SSJJ 5S7t ASp )SS)a �si t_L sin"m }set SSM -+6 6770 J4 SSit 3519!!11 710} 810i J"4 N �i1a1 N� 1 '1 slid t/ia0fam baN 6001 yjJt� �% tYll 'b'�19e }NO 67111107114691 111 3*06 6t0Ab 671 6/M Ola diad 6010 N�laaOr Saar�l5H0 }aha M" 6 �Sa0 Sf00 iStaO, �t S blff Al6ddd3 sw 1)1)65011 .0575 JSada D40! 675] 7613 67 rta6105 U0t dy�yt fa 447060tf 11Stl`[t ssa0t 36 N..ftt] bl S1y w.c.Fwrnh.Ns tea.-.n;ete3WGd1%1 ..f daft },.__sat60 i �St7a PID: 2911721330047 !,; At d J �, o e 5239 Highwood Or W Edina, MN 55436 it City of Edina #tJT StYF L*VU wooloot NUmiel LdAwk 101l#vk 116010 LrMk CJy twolt salt �y/ 1 SY4$ #1}4 #420 !t',d fdfi ..,' iAl1rR® JI Li/.o U.. Ow drat tf �1 Gw \ \V1 3ata ❑ ® P.S. Kxdis4wvJw 24 J4 1r 1 Jt ,,...• yy �tla szsa aril #J}# i aJid d}MJ NIJ sm sm f alae #JJs 3JD0 SJOI MITStJi 5144 #J8d f Si00 NOd SdM Sita 51W 3JOJ I Sits lilt sill told 09IJ0aW ow Mo RIM CA 4020 #JJi 5310 Of) doi4 SAM said #dal. RQ 54M Nid 501 1400NOd 10N tOsd 0071 dOtt &It} tl0a'9 Sid? _.^ W"id d! 24 $404 AYA.fA1V?MYO 3400 5/04 W) gips 5413W1 101 Wlt #4010 d'VI #1Ii VARW SMi sd lN# Ni} 54 1410 &o" 3424 34024 N9} SO4 N04 Ji #!09 ##11 am diff OfOt 0101 dt00 "M "to 1012 ftw NJl Mi 3#IJ s3ad Of 34" cern PID:2911721330047 , I.V P 5239 Mighwood Dr W �Q ' Edina, MN 55436 M City of Edina 1 M" SShwt OW— lld.ls 61y t iwiS F' r! M 04,00- V.4, CM#s taint ".." TM sPla � ►arta Sera 6rrP Srra i O P..), 6240 � 6x4 - swr 1211 _ ...._. I 6w6 SM 1444 carr auoa 6014 xy Sera 011 far! No Ow wov M aCr> "it a61r Mi 6040 :T sw1 "VS foal "M If s!M sirs 6411 slrl SltJ 6x0 M AV^v on w �YSIM !!r! S1N arise.-wr,at cw,r#.c:.a .etnpa Slrr N r! SSW �yq . ' q ` PID: 2911721330047 5239 Highwood Dr W',� war~j'� �, •�, Y?r O *4. Edina, MN 55436 tar a. � 11,1 M j,KSS Nil'3WIVNd N1303 3AIZJO 01010 VWli 041'g PUDI V, wi I 6fj 7AING GOOA414D11-1 g ,iv-aoAvz wir joi rt - 6 T --z T POJ -DIS 1Vn3SV3 117clS 107 G3SOdOYd 6 OlIzzi 4J AJ C: ri 0 �4 N t74) E,' 41 0 .,See M > X X, - >�' 1p.l?tr 7- 0 41 LU 0 40-56 DRIVE r. EXISTING HOUSE #5239 111*191 SX PROPOSED LOT LM--t— Drainage &_ Utility Easement -IVO 60 08 N0 50 100 150 SCALE IN FEET SF Square Peet • Iron monuments House Locations by Others Drainage & Utility Easements to remain as located PINE MIRROR LAKE 7 L6T- .v Drainage 'Easement 'i.e Drainage & utility [ Easement N '66000 p W ao 100T S Its-, GROVE ROAD Cl DRIVE 40.56 B- 2'. Z) - S, E r Drainage & Utility Easement ry 0 50 100 150' cr, A i E /A/ FEET Z,6000 > SF Square Feet 0 iron monuments House Locations by Others.40 Drainage & Utility Easements to remain as located 183.41 PINE GROVE 77f 16(v I.f. I M, I MIRROR 152.6 LAKE LOT 7 EXGTNG- �G 150.ou ) SE {GUS 2 3 9 Co d f iii Drainage Basement 5-440 Sf- Line =t— 195.30 - 174,73 110.0---- i/-U \'�Drainage & tilitY Easement ry 0 50 100 150' cr, A i E /A/ FEET Z,6000 > SF Square Feet 0 iron monuments House Locations by Others.40 Drainage & Utility Easements to remain as located 183.41 PINE GROVE 77f 16(v I.f. I M, I The City of Edina: Edina Aquatic Center Page 1 of 2 j — Search go Sign In Edina Aquatic Center Back to City Homepage Updates: Edina Aquatic Center General Information Season Pass Amenities Attractions Concessions Stand )C7, t Ma Print Group Reservations Birthday Parties Virtual Tour Pick another park or place: Other places Edina Aquatic Center The Edina Aquatic center has something exciting for everyone! Our pirate -themed environment provides a safe and fun backdrop for the perfect summer. Visit our unique pools and attractions, where you will create a treasure chest full of lasting family memories. View Department The main attraction of the Edina Aquatic Center is an Olympic -sized Directory pool with a step-in entry, a three -meter diving board, a one -meter diving board and lap swimming lanes. For swimmers' comfort, the water temperature in all pools is kept at 82-84 degrees Fahrenheit. Out at sea, swimmers beware of The Lost Wave! The newest attraction at the Aquatic Center, this surf -simulator allows novices and veterans alike to try (heir skills at catching a wave in a safe environment! A skip to be mastered, this 'wave in a box' gives y,! swimmers a chance to body board or surf standing up. The Pirate's Plunge --a water slide tower --features a 207400( body ?`V slide and 300 -tool tube flume, with single, double and triple lubes t available. { r j 5 Daring young swimmers By across the water on the Shipwreck Express—a thrilling cable ride. Riders climb aboard a 110 -fool platform, built to took like a ship's bow, grab onto a trapeze bar, glide over the pool and splash into the water below. t4 The popular children's pool features spiral and tunnel slides, a lire swing, sprays, fountains and other water -in -motion amenities. For easy entry, water depth begins at zero and gradually increases to 18 inches. \ Children can dry off and exercise their imaginations in Oakwood Forest, a tree house -themed playground. The focal point of the dry play area is a large tree with a climb -though center, look -out tower and slide exit. The playground also features a life-size giraffe and hippo, monkey bars and a rope spider web. Aquatic Center t o`eweiv/ :i? Ep.,.. �i wvtiaremuoae. 4 4300 W. 66th Sl. Edina, MN 55435 952-833-9543 (Prior to Jw�ew 15)t 952-833-9560 A06 L (.hmc6',4u>;tesffi# YUf3l mait®EdinaMN.gov t Hours Click here to view the Aquatic Centees hours of operation. M M http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=aquatic-center 12/4/2015 The City of Edina: Page 1 of 2 Search go Back to City Homepage Updates: Thank you for making Summer of 2015 a great season at the Edina Aquatic Center! See you next year! _.._. _ _.. ... .... w Print Edina Aquatic Center General Information Aquatic Center General Information1 Have a general question? Try our Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. Looking for a summer 1 x,41 a c 2 job at the Aquatic Center? Then visit our jobs page .LVe.aleor-oBer-ssdmmingiassbns p 6w.-. . Employment Jo'<1 �YW'Iiyl jl 1 Rules & Policies • Directionsi C Swimming Lessons ( 6 Hours Ait 'c?, :;v; 1i��4 ,.21 aW wanrro�p FAQ Rales ; 4300 W. Stith St, Season Pass Edina, MN 55435 Amenities Directions 952-833-9543 From the intersection of Interstate Highway 494 and Highway 100 go north on Highway 100 to (Prior to June 6, 2015) Attractions Crosstown Highway 62. Go east on Crosstown Highway 62 to Valley View Road. The Edina 952-833-9560 Concessions Stand Aquatic Center is the first right o8 of Valley View Road (June 6 -August 23, 2015) For more information, call the Edina Parks & Recreation Department at 952-826.0367. Group Reservations Back to lop mail@EdlnaMN.gov Birthday Parties a� E Virtual Tour Hours For the 2015 season, the Edina Aquatic Center will open Jum fi,and close A49.»83. Pick another park or place: June 3 July Hours* Other places Mein Pool Monday -Friday 11:30 a.m. - 8;30 p.m. Saturday 8 Sunday 10 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. / re1 Zero -Depth Pool Monday - Sunday 10 a.m. - 8:30 p.m. The Lost Wave FlowRider Monday - Friday 11:30 a.m. - 8 p.m- Saturday & Sunday 10 a.m. - 8 p in 'Fourth of Juy hours are 10 a.m. - 8 p.m. - .-... ... .. i August Hours Main Pool Monday - Friday 1130 a.m. -.8 p.m.�� Saturday &Sunday 90 a mSwimming. - 8 p.m. Lessons Zero -Depth Pool Monday - Sunday 10 a.m. - 8 p.m. The Lost Wave FlowRider Monday - Friday 11:30 a.m. - 7:30 p.m. Saturday & Sunday 10 a.m. - 730 p.m. Lap Swim (Entire Season)' i B Monday - Thursday 6 - 8 p.m. Saturday 8- 10 a.m. http://edinanin.gov/index.php?section=Aquatic-center-general-information 12/4/2015 The City of Edina: Sunday 10 a.m. -noon 'Zip line will not be open during lap swimming hours, Back to top Rales Purchase your season passes online' RdqujbWuvyA9.,,not µdO"w Passes are non- transferrable and Include children of all ages, nannies, foreign exchange students and grandchildren. A season pass or daily admission for children 12 months of age or older as of June ,"81 Z048'must be purchased. All pass members, excludinq the nanny, must live at the same address Unfortunately, the Edina Aquatic Center can no longer accept personal checks. However. we do accept cash and credit cards for admission and at our concessions stand. For more information, call the Edina Aquatic Center a[952-833-9560 Season Passes Resident Non• Iden) " 1" Individual* so �' � . � 10, ��'��>�f •�"� Each additional family member* 8 { I,(-- FlowRider(addilionalparperson) i f k'.!(}(� s` Dally Admission Daily Admissiorq Daily Admission after 5 p.m.Y �t FlowRider daily admission =, )(additional per person Aquatic Instruction Swim Lessons Contracted r3#g FlowRidar Instruction ,; J,, � .469'(30 minutes) minutes) , j(60 of inelud y.,, Back to top i k.. The City of Edina 4801 W. 80th St. Edina, MN 55484 mailQEdinaMN.gov 588.931.5861 ® 8016 City Of Edina, Minnesota : (4".-x,IJ� Edina Aquatic Center 4300 W. 88th St. Edina, MN 88436 mail@EdinaMN,gov 958.833.9060 Page 2 of 2 http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=Aquatic-center-general-information 12/4/2015 The City of Edina: Page I of 2 Search go ii Sign In Edina Aquatic Center Back to City Homepage Updates: Thank you for making Summer or 2015 a great season at the Edina Aquatic Center! See you next yearl vvi?. Edina Aquatic Center Season Pass �j General Information Pass holders do not pay for daily adgission. The more you come, the more you save! Season Pass Aquatic Center Season Pass For Residents Buy Online Fee Through Fee May Amenities April 30 1 -Aug, ?Z Attractions tridividuallFirst Family Member '$47 $� Concessions Stand Each Additional Family Member Residing in the Same Household Group Reservations , FlrnvRider(addtionalperperson;&,,adaWoMy,totKo-t6' Birthday Parties with s,,Season Pass) V Virtual Tour R&V§jSWAbo" do notinctude'ta*,1 Pick another park or place: Other places Aquatic Center Season Pass For Non -Residents At Print Aquatic Center X "I i NOW, 16 �j °, yrOMlrOmOw 4300 W. 661h St. Edina, MN 55435 952-833-9543 (Prior to June 6, 2015) 952-833-9560 (June 6 -August 23, 2015) mall@EdinaMN.gov The City of Edina Edina Aquatic Center 4801 W. Both St. 4300 W. 66th St. Edina, MN 68424 Edina, UN 85435 http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=aquatic-season-pass 12/4/2015 Fee Through Fee May April 30 1 -Aug. 23 IndividuaLiFirst Family Member Each Additional Family Member Residing in the SameA -T, Household / kw j$2 FicnvRider(adddiwaLparpikrson,..evabHeontyloVVW"" with p,§#wm.Pas4 -x, 1 `A Prices listed above do not include (mac, �.^,�� At Print Aquatic Center X "I i NOW, 16 �j °, yrOMlrOmOw 4300 W. 661h St. Edina, MN 55435 952-833-9543 (Prior to June 6, 2015) 952-833-9560 (June 6 -August 23, 2015) mall@EdinaMN.gov The City of Edina Edina Aquatic Center 4801 W. Both St. 4300 W. 66th St. Edina, MN 68424 Edina, UN 85435 http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=aquatic-season-pass 12/4/2015 w9tNr n e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Kris Aaker January 11, 2012 B-11-14 Assistant Planner Recommended Action: Approve the variances as requested. Project Description: A 2 foot side yard setback variance to allow a 3 foot side yard setback and a 5.7 foot rear yard setback variance to allow a 19.3 foot rear yard setback to expand the existing garage width and depth for property located at 5805 Johnson Drive for William and Denise Denison. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND The subject property, is located on the east side of Johnson Drive and south of Grove Street consisting of a one and one half story home with an attached garage, see attached Exhibit A.1 — A. 2, site location maps. The home was built in 1941 and has had few improvements made to it over the years, see Exhibit 13.1 — B. 3, photos of the subject home and neighbors to the north and south. The applicant is proposing to add onto the existing home to include a family room, master bedroom, laundry with an office above on the south side of the home and a garage expansion to the north side of the home. All of the improvements conform to the ordinance requirements with the exception of the garage addition towards the north and south lot lines. The garage is proposed to be located 3 feet from the north side lot line and 19.3 feet from the easterly rear lot line. The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 5 foot side yard setback and a 25 foot rear yard setback for an attached garage. The homeowner would like to expand the existing narrow garage width from 19.6 feet to 21.6 feet and add 10 feet onto the depth of the garage for additional storage and shop area see Exhibit C.1 — C. 9, site survey, site plan, floor plans and elevations and photos provided by the applicant. The site is .29 acres, which is a comfortable lot size, however, is at the minimum lot depth of 120 feet. The home was built much farther back on the lot than neighboring homes leaving a shallow rear yard for expansion. The homes on either side of the subject home are closer to the front lot line and were not setback as deep from the front lot line. It should be noted that the garage on the subject home is even farther back and deeper into the rear yard than the main portion of the house. The house was also built much closer to the north lot line leaving no opportunity to expand garage width without the benefit of a variance. The original placement of the house and garage, (farther back on the tot and closer to the north lot line), make planning a garage expansion difficult for the property. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single-family homes. Easterly: Single-family homes Southerly: Single-family homes Westerly: Single-family homes Existing Site Features The subject property is 13, 046 square feet in area. The existing home is one and one half stories and was built in 1941 with brick and siding as finished exterior materials. Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Building Design Single-family detached R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District The proposal is to add to both the north and south sides of the home. Materials on the addition will match the existing materials on the house. Compliance Table N Ci Standard Proposed Front - Average of adjacent homes: 38.5 42.9 feet Side- 5 feet for a garage 3 feet Rear- 25 feet 19.3 feet N Building Height 2'/ stories 1 1/2 stories, 30 feet to midpoint 35 feet to 18 feet to midpoint, 23.5 ridge, feet to ridge Lot covers we 25% 24.51% * Variance Required Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit Zoning District and complies with all requirements with the exception of north side yard and rear yard setback. 2. The additions are appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property and not detract from the neighbors or neighborhood. The most impacted neighbor to the north supports the requested variances as proposed. 3. The improvements will provide a reasonable use of the site and allow for a standard garage. Currently the garage is too narrow to be considered a two car garage. Generally the Planning Commission has been supportive of variances to improve garages to enclose two cars. Variances that have been granted have allowed a side yard setback of no closer than 3 feet. The ordinance requires a minimum two car garage per single dwelling unit. The existing width of the garage is substandard. The variance would allow a standard garage width. 4. The additions are minimal and reasonable given the deep front yard setback and minimal side and rear yard area available for expansion. Spacing between the garage sidewall and the home to the north will be 16.5 feet; spacing between the back wall of the garage and the home to the east will be approximately 80 feet. • Is the proposed variance justified? Yes. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Section 850.0.Subd., requires the following findings for approval of a variance: 3 Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will, 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable and that the existing placement of the house and location of existing windows and doors provide practical difficulties in designing a reasonable addition to the garage. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The unique circumstances are the original placement of the home far back and closer north on the lot and the existing floor plan with windows and doors that would be obstructed if the garage were to be expanded towards the street. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed garage addition will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The addition will add just 2 feet to the width of the garage and will not be as close to the side lot line as an existing shed attached to the north side of the garage. The rear yard variance requested will have minimal if any impact on the property to the east. The elevation of the garage as viewed from the front street will be virtually identical to what is currently present on-site. The neighbor to the north has submitted a letter requesting that the garage addition extend eastward instead of towards the front yard to preserve views from windows on the south side of their home. 4 Staff Recommendation Recommend that the Planning Commission approve the variances. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is a minimal encroachment into the side and rear yard as is needed for the addition. b. The practical difficulties in adding onto the home are as a result of the original house placement closer to the north lot line and nearer to the back/easterly lot line and given the existing floor plan. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Survey date stamped: December 8, 2011. Building plans/ elevations date stamped: December 8, 2011. Deadline for a City decision: February 12, 2012 5 High Ground Construction tjr- h Z06 5 6 617 1/5/2012 Kris Aaker Assistant Planner City of Edina 4801 W 50`" St Edina MN 55424 Dear Kris, We are requesting a variance to move the North & East Garage walls at 5805 Johnson Dr for the following reasons listed below. The proposed design will encroach into the setback area. The new design allows for additional storage and shop area and also allows for an increased width to accommodate a more functional parking design. 1. The addition allows the driveway area to remain as is. If the addition were moved towards the West it would reduce parking space for guests forcing them to utilize street parking. 2. The proposed addition allows the side door access for the house to remain. Moving towards the West would eliminate the side door. 3. New design allows the (North) neighbor to keep the natural light and view from the South West. 4. Widening the garage or movement to the North, allows for an acceptable garage door width. The existing garage door does not allow exiting from the passenger side of the vehicle parked in North of garage. S. The proposed addition would eliminate the need for a separate shed/ building for seasonal equipment. This separate building would reduce the neighbor's SE view. Sincerely, Ryan Hochbrunn High Ground Construction December 2,2011 Dear City Hall, We, William and Patricia Hansen, would agree to a variance for the property of 5805 Johnson Drive. William and Denise Denison would like to do a variance for their garage of three feet (north) on the side of the garage and ten feet (east) off the back of the garage. Five of the ten feet would need the variance. We would much rather see the remodel go toward the back of the property line versus forward as it would obscure the view from the window on the south side of our house. Sincerely, William C Hansen Patricia G Hansen FLIABETIHi ANN COLEMAN , PUBLIC MINNESOTA NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA N MY C.Ommissm Expes Jan. A31,2O16 self I 34ti I "a I 36a I sea I 13332 IMAM" AYE 3715 Sett 5809 3443 5700 $613 3012 am# 3801 3644 4yK1Yk 317 not aaa 3413 0349 3603 .,,,�..,.M 3445 6401 4109M'"�o Se/l 36375423 $us 5417 LOCATION MAP 337? sslr 3315 eradrrtPtrk ,....,.m,... 24 Sias 24 ►e6 A46i�fa 3351 3701 5304 1 51.V PID:3211721410099 5805 3ohnson Dr Edina, MN 55436 J'= Legend HIVNI&bd FFsNws Howe limber Labsle Street tams Labels ../ Guy Limits Crooke 0 Lake Names r .. I Lowell a Perks 0 Psrce t LOGISMap Output Page Page I of 2 Property Assessing 14. Z. http://gis.logis.org/I,OGIS—ArelMS/ims?ServiceNaiiie=ed LOGISMaprOVSDE&ClientVe... 1/3/2012 Cl ty of Edina �r inti. ; .. Et M �M fed �Y'• y. t " 4f Y' # g d,e p v � + n '7 Z .ewe 'l e^li�Y.x 7 O'I�I 5805 r Edina, MN S5436 Property Assessing 14. Z. http://gis.logis.org/I,OGIS—ArelMS/ims?ServiceNaiiie=ed LOGISMaprOVSDE&ClientVe... 1/3/2012 Page 1 of I �J f we J file://ed-ntl/citywide/PDSImages/Photos/3211721410099001 jpg 1/5/2012 Page t of 1 /�. 7 tile://ed-ntl/citywide/PDSIinages/Photos/3211721410098001 jpg 1/5/2012 Page 1 of 1 lb.�3 File://ed-ntl/citywide/PDSImages/Photos/3211721410108001 jpg 1/5/2012 Existing Conditions Survey INVOICE NO. 79M With Proposed Additions F.B.NO. 1057-04 SCALE: 1 20' For: No, 5601 HIGH GROUND CONSTRUCTION Pmpcvy wcawd in Section 0.mAes E-hN FV,*— e, t 32. Towfthip I t?, Range 2 1. Hamcpm Cotinty Mmw%ota 0—P (121-34 Plat) E—'t— Cr, to meas. N SMr36- E 121.09 er wow --PfflpeM A------- ddmw 5RMJohrmaDnw E&m M�u kasur is ned Bmbruark: Top Not fljy4mu Tooted at the intersection vrJnhtu,*nDriNvandGwuvSirw 1v t'-e"e r�— Lot area 5.q &Z Eta - WIN red -jaa� -b� 5q ftzt PPO!' No. 5605 'River purvo 367 �-q &:!7 (5 f 7 - 150 of eanLe) 9i pberh ; 14 sq k= noThe Gregory Group � 1-w, 143 54 It= -10AAd 24 sq ft;t d,b-, CS 2.036 ft:,.r LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. in I W, LAND SURVEYORS REGISTER ED UNDER THE LAWS OF.SrATE OF MINNESOTA TfO I 16301 =3e43 Nb� 5."Z� F. �,- 5Mt-%=— LC eYr T CD z > P'wpm-4 M-Awwrr 27ururgars Tpr1ifiratr Lot mw 13.04CC 54 P;t -WE --�? trz 321 sq Pzt (471 150-q&%:e} Anwr —925 ttv"' "'W' y 1.230 set ez 257M t� AC T04W 3.198 The Only 08anwnts OMraa are IMM P0t5 M.ewM V eft-l"m Cr N,W.t, d'em — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — iSirlG I Car* ma oft Dun. sp-mf4abm 0, f"m u@Styr "V ff -P w, i -am w- mat I an a 0* ucensed u" www "* I&.% of 0e scam ot mmewA SW13'33"W 120.'64 meas. (120.7a plat) Stoveyed this 11th day at Navernber 2011. Ggftr�gpwy Itima, Reg No 24M e, Lot 2, Block 1, WILLIAM C HANSEN ADDITION Rev I2 -a- I I Ls,146na Ad&C- jDr—fly Peak Hennepin County, Minnesota 4e NanaNo. 560-9 1j t I 91 all S� Y z � V 'U b Y 4 all I— V t :1. �> A# `" r a 3 r,4 t v �— m °S �> A# `" r a 3 r,4 t v �— w