The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2012-09-12 Planning Commission Meeting MinutesAGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER IL ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Planning Commission August 22, 2012. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Planning Commission will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Side Yard Setback Variance for Jim and Crissy Field, 7312 Wooddale Avenue, Edina, MN/Withdrew B. Site Plan and Front Yard Setback Review for Stuart Development Company, 10 Southdale Center, Edina, MN VII. REPORTS A. Sketch Plan, Frauenshuh Inc., 7700 France Avenue, Edina, MN VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS • Council Connection • Attendance VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS IX. STAFF COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting. Next Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission September 27, 2012 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 12, 2012 VI.B Community Development Director INFORMATION/BAC KG RO U N D Project Description Stuart Development Company and Simon Properties are proposing to develop the southeast comer of the Southdale site with a 232 -unit luxury rental apartment and townhome development. (See property location on pages Al A4.) The site is currently an overflow parking lot for Southdale and is used by park -n -riders for Metro Transit. The applicant is proposing to develop the site with an upscale 10 & 6 -story apartment building; and a 3-4 story townhouse building. (See the attached packet of plans & the narrative and plans on page A8—A59.) A 5.1 acre site would be created on the Southdale site. Parking would be primarily provided underneath the apartments and within two -stall attached garages for the townhomes. Visitor surface parking is provided north and south of the buildings. Primary access would be off of 69th Street and from the Southdale frontage road. Proposed density would be 45 units per acre. The site plan, building footprints and site circulation have not changed significantly from the plans reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council as part of the sketch plan review. The one-story podium structure on the first level has been reduced in size from the Sketch Plan proposal. The buildings have been specifically designed, and landscaping has been upgraded. Additionally, a pedestrian connection has been added along 69 Street to the existing sidewalk connection that exists from the Galleria to south side of the restaurant area, specifically in front of the Cheesecake Factory. (See pages A58—A59.) To accommodate the above request, the following is requested: 1. Site Plan Review. 2. Conditional Use Permit to allow the residential use. 3. Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 and 42 feet. 4. Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 to 6,442 spaces. 5. Re -Plat of the Southdale Site. To reconfigure the existing lots. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Southdale Parking Lot; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center Easterly: Key Cadillac; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center Southerly: The Westin; Zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAG, Community Activity Center Westerly: Southdale Shopping Center; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.1 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains surface parking. The overall size of the Southdale Parcel is 80.5 acres. (See pages Al— A4.) Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC, Community Activity Center (See page A5—A7.) Zoning: PCD -3, Planned Commercial District -3. (See page A2.) Building Material The proposed building would be made of prefinished metal and aluminum siding, painted cement siding and composite wood panel siding. These uses are consistent with allowed building materials in the PCD -3 district. (See materials on page A23.) The applicant will have a materials board at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. Comprehensive Guide Plan The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for "CAC, Community Activity Center." (See pages A5—A7.) The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as "The most intense district in terms uses, height and coverage. Primary uses include: retail, office, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings." "Mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. (See page A7.) Therefore, the proposed use would be consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan designation. This would be the first residential component on the 80 acre Southdale site. The Comprehensive Plan requires a maximum height of four (12) stories and 144 feet tall, and a podium height of 3-5 stories. (See page A6.) 2 Additionally, the proposal would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of linier buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. b. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. C. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. d. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. e. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) g. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character.* h. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. i. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. j. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. k. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life; streets that are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity - generating uses. Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine-grained and interconnected network of local streets and paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points.* m. Within corridors served by existing or planned transit, orient buildings toward sidewalks and paths that lead to mixed use destinations and transit stops. As discussed below, items g and I above could be improved by adding an additional and more direct pedestrian connection to Southdale Mail. Podium Height The suggested development guidelines within the CAC state that "Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower -density districts and upper stories "step back" from the street." This was also suggested to the applicant by the Planning Commission and City Council during the Sketch Plan review. "Podium Height" was encouraged from the street. The applicant has attempted to address this issue, as they are proposing two small one-story bump outs on the first floor along York Avenue. (See page A22 and A28.) However, the Comprehensive Plan suggests 3-5 story podium height. (See page A6.) The proposed plan is more like a reverse podium, with the 3 -4 -story building on the interior of the lot, with the tall buildings on the street. The applicant is however, proposing a very nice pedestrian walkway along York and 69th. (See pages A58—A59.) Site Access The primary access to the site would remain off of 69th Street West and from the frontage road within Southdale. The access to 69th would be a right in and right out only. (See page A38.) Access to the underground parking garage for the apartments would be from the north and west end of the buildings. A main pedestrian access would be created at the 69th and York intersection with a pedestrian walkway that leads into a shared entrance court. (See pages A38 and A22.) Pedestrian Connections The applicant is proposing a very nice series of pedestrian connections around the building on York and 69th. (See pages A58—A59.) However, a direct connection from the apartments to a Southdale entrance has not been provided. A resident of the apartments would have to walk to the new 69th Street sidewalk, 4 which would connect into the pedestrian connection from The Galleria which leads to the south end of the restaurants (Cheesecake Factory), and not a main entrance to the mall. (See page A60—A62.) Section 850.07. Subd. 24. states: "In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a Final Development Plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to Subsection 850.04. The expense of such improvements shall be borne by the applicant. A. It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property i) in locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan and ii) in other locations where the Council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. B. Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this Subd. C. Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. D. Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. E. Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the Engineer. F. Non-residential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. Based on the above Zoning Ordinance requirement, a direct connection from the apartments to a Southdale entrance should be required as a condition of approval. The pictures on pages A63—A66 demonstrate an example of a possible pedestrian connection that could be made to the new entrance to the mall. Both the Planning Commission and City Council emphasized the importance of pedestrian connections during the Sketch Plan review for this project. While the proposed sidewalks are great, this additional connection should also be made. Staff would recommend a direct connection be required as a condition of approval of the project. This additional connection would meet the following Principle of the Comprehensive Plan: "Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine-grained and interconnected network of local streets and paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points. The city engineer has also reviewed the pedestrian connections plans, and has offered additional comments and conditions in his review memo dated September 7, 2012. (See page All 55—A157.) Transit As shown on page A158—A163, the apartments would be located south of the future Southdale Transit Center, which as indicated in the applicant narrative, there are seven different routes (3 express) that connect bus users to downtown Minneapolis, the U of M, Normandale, the Mall of America, Bloomington, Minneapolis, Richfield, and Eden Prairie. Traffic & Parking WSB & Associates conducted a parking and traffic study. (See pages A67— A149.) The Study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. The level of service on adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. (See pages A79—A80 of the Study.) The Study does however recommend the construction of an eastbound left turn lane at 691h Street and the Southdale West access. (See page A80.) This should be made a condition of approval. The Study further concludes that Southdale would have adequate parking, despite the parking stalls being removed to provide for the development. (See page A78—A80.) Based on the square footage of the retailer at the Southdale site, the number of seats in the existing restaurants and theater, as Southdale, 6,747 spaces are required for parking. The applicant is proposing 6,442 spaces as a result of the proposed development. Therefore, a variance of 305 stalls is requested. Based on information from the (ITE) Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, the WSB traffic study concludes that 5,952 parking spaces 0 are adequate to support Southdale. Therefore, there would be an excess of 490 stalls at Southdale. Previously a 759 stall variance was granted to Southdale in 2001, when the restaurants were added on to Southdale. (See pages Al50—Al53.) The parking stall shortage at Southdale has not been a problem over the past 10+ years. The existing parking stalls have suited Southdale well over the years. If the shortage of parking were ever to be a problem at Southdale, a structured parking ramp could always be added. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 54 overstory trees and a full complement of understory trees and shrubs are required. The landscape plan shows 135 existing and proposed overstory trees around the perimeter of the site & 400+ understory trees and shrubs. (See landscape plan on pages A40—A42.) Grading & Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the plans and found them generally acceptable and offered comments in the attached memo. (See pages Al55—Al57.) The engineer's comments and recommendations within the memo shall be made a condition of approval. Conditional Use Permit Per Section 850.04 Subd. 5.E, the City Council shall not grant a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The existing utilities are adequate to serve the proposed use. A traffic study was done by WSB, which concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed development. As a condition of approval of the project the applicant will be required to construct an eastbound left turn lane at 69th Street and the Southdale West access. (See pages A79—A80 of the traffic study.) 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; WSB conducted a traffic study to determine the impact of the proposed development on the existing roadways. As demonstrated on page A79 of the 7 study, the level of service on the adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; This site is located in the CAC, Community Activity Center, which is described in the Comprehensive Plan as "the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Primary uses include, retail, office, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings." In terms of the size of the Southdale site, it is underdeveloped. The allowed floor area ratio (FAR) on the Southdale site is 1.0 of the tract. With the proposed development, the FAR would be just .43. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; The development fits in very well on the site. It would be located within an under-utilized parking lot for Southdale. The park and riders that currently use this area would be relocated to the new bus transit area in the northeast corner of the Southdale site. (See transit station "draft' plans on pages A158— A163.) The size of the proposed buildings would fit in well with the 18 -story Westin hotel and condominiums to the south, York Place Apartments to the east, and Southdale to the west. (See page A31.) 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and With the exception of the variances that are requested, the plans meet all city code provisions and are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned above, as a conditionally permitted use within the PCD -3 District, which is primarily a commercial retail zoning district; a residential use should be integrated into the development where it is located. As proposed, the applicant is proposing to add pedestrian walkways around the perimeter of the building, and along 69th Street. (See pages A58—A59.) The connection on 69th Street is the proposed pedestrian connection for residents to Southdale. This connection from 69th leads to the Cheesecake Factory, and the south side of the restaurants. (See page A60.) If a resident wanted to go to Southdale they would have to pass in front of all the restaurants in that area before reaching a door to Southdale. While this is a nice connection to the area, especially for residents of the Westin or the apartments at 69th and York, an additional and more direct connection should be made for these residents. The pictures on pages A63—A66 demonstrate an example of a pedestrian connection that could be made to the new entrance to the mall. Both the Planning Commission and City Council emphasized the 8 importance of pedestrian connections during the Sketch Plan review for this project. Staff would recommend this or some type of direct connection be made a condition of approval of the project. The city engineer has offered additional comments and conditions in regard to pedestrian connections on pages Al55—Al57. 6. /s consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned previously, the proposed use and density of the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as "The most intense district in term, lodging, entertainment and residential uses, combined or in separate buildings. Mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites." The floor area ratio for the Southdale tract is just ,43, when 1.0 is allowed by Ordinance. Variance — Building Setback Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setback. However, the City Code Section 850.16. Subd. 12. C. states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along York Avenue that would provide an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. (See pages A58—A59.) The City's code requirement for buildings to be set back an equal distance to the height creates difficulty in developing the site. The setback requirement encourages parking lots to be built in front of buildings, and does not encourage an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The City E Code requirement for height and some of the goals for development in the Comprehensive Plan are in conflict. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. The City encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building from the adjacent streets. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed building is not as tall as The Westin, located to the south. The proposed setback is also generally similar to the Westin and the CVS Pharmacy that was also brought up to the street. The building would add to the character of the neighborhood. Variance — Parking Stalls Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed parking stall variance is reasonable. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the study, 5,952 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,442 spaces. 10 A variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls; over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. The City of Edina does not want to require unnecessary paving for parking stalls that are not needed. The City would rather have additional green space and building if applicable. This proposed project would add both. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. It is the only regional shopping mall in Edina. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. Again, the City would rather see green space and development rather than large parking lots that are not needed. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a structured parking ramp. Based on the parking study done by WSB, this parking would not be needed Subdivision The applicant is proposing to re -plat the entire Southdale property to create a parcel on which the proposed development would be located. There are currently nine lots on the site. With the proposed re -plat, there would also be nine lots. Because there are no new lots being created, no park dedication can be required by the City of Edina. To accomplish the re -plat, existing Parcel 4 would get combined with Parcel 3, and Tract B would be created from parts of Parcel 3 and Parcel 5. (See pages A35—A36.) 11 Compliance Table * Requires Variance PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 12 City Standard (PCD -3) Proposed Building Setbacks 10 - story building Front — York 115 feet 63 feet* Front — West 69th Street 115 feet 140 feet Side — West 115 feet 150+ feet Side — North 115 feet 200+ feet Building Setbacks 6 - story building Front — York 65 feet 127 feet Front — West 69th Street 65 feet 86 feet Side — East 65 feet 165 feet Side — North 65 feet 200+ feet Building Height Twelve Stories or 144 feet Ten Stories & whichever is less 115 feet Building Coverage 30% 26% Maximum Floor Area 1.0 of the tract .43 of the tract Ratio (FAR) Tract size = 80.4 acres or Gross s.f. _ 3,499,610 s.f. 1,522,275 s.f. Density 12+ units per acre 45 units per acre Parking Stalls (Site) 232 enclosed — Based on 232 287 enclosed units & 55 surface Parking Stalls 6,747 spaces (based on 6,442 spaces* (Southdale) 1,194,731 square feet of retail,1,957 seats of restaurant, 3,447 seats of theater and 232 units of apartments Parking Stall Size 8.5'x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Requires Variance PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 12 1. The proposed use is a conditionally permitted use in the PCD -3 Zoning District; and as demonstrated previously in this report, as long as the proposed development is well connected to Southdale with pedestrian connections, the proposal meets the conditions of approval outlined in the City Zoning Ordinance for this conditionally permitted use. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Southdale site is under -developed in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR is 1.0, including residential uses. The existing and proposed uses only total a .43 FAR. 4. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and building sizes blend in well with the 18 -story Westin to the south, the 4 -story York Place Apartment and Southdale. (See building renderings on pages A22—A33.) The six -story building is roughly the same height as Southdale. (See page A31.) 5. The parking and traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that there would be more than adequate parking for the entire Southdale site, and the subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. 6. With the proposed and recommended pedestrian connections, the development would be integrated into the Southdale development. • Are the proposed variances justified? Yes. As demonstrated above, staff believes the proposed variances are justified. Findings for the building setback variance are recommended as follows: 1. The proposal meets the variance criteria. 2. The City encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building from the adjacent streets. Section 850.16. Subd. 12. C. of the Zoning Ordinance states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along York Avenue and would provide an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. (See pages A58—A59.) 3. The City's code requirement for buildings to be setback an equal distance to the height creates difficulty in developing the site. The setback 13 requirement encourages parking lots to be built in front of buildings, and does not encourage an active pedestrian environment. 4. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 5. The proposed building fits the character of the neighborhood, which includes a variety of building types and height. 6. The proposed setback is generally similar to the Westin, and CVS pharmacy which were also brought up closer to the street than allowed by City Code. Findings for the parking stall setback variance are recommended as follows: 1. The proposal meets the Variance criteria. 2. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the study, 5,952 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,442 spaces. 3. A variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls; over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. 4. The City of Edina does not wish to require unnecessary paving for parking stalls that are not needed. The City would rather have additional green space and building if applicable. This proposed project would add both. 5. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. It is the only regional shopping mall in Edina. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 6. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a structured parking ramp. 14 Staff Recommendation Site Plan with Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 feet and Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 spaces to 6,442 spaces. Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Front Yard Setback Variance from 115 feet to 63 feet and Parking Stall Variance from 6,747 spaces to 6,442 spaces. Approval is subject to the following findings: With the exception of the proposed variances, the proposal meets all minimum City Code requirements. 2. The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto - oriented development sites, encourage placement of linier buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. b. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. C. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. d. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. e. Limit driveway access from primary streets while encouraging access from secondary streets. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) g. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. h. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. 15 Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. j. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. k. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life; streets that are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity - generating uses. 1. Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine-grained and interconnected network of local streets and paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points. M. Within corridors served by existing or planned transit, orient buildings toward sidewalks and paths that lead to mixed use destinations and transit stops. 3. The Southdale site is underdeveloped in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR is 1.0. The existing and proposed uses only total .43. 4. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and building sizes blend in well in the area. 5. The traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. 6. The proposal meets the variance criteria. 7. The City encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building from the adjacent streets. Section 850.16. Subd. 12. C. of the Zoning Ordinance states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. 8. The applicant is proposing a sidewalk along York Avenue and would provide an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. 9. The City's code requirement for buildings to be setback an equal distance to the height creates difficulty in developing the site. The setback requirement encourages parking lots to be built in front of buildings, and M does not encourage an active pedestrian environment suggested in the Comprehensive Plan. 10. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 11. The proposed setback is similar to the Westin and CVS pharmacy, which were also brought up closer to the street than allowed by City Code. 12. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the study, 5,952 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,442 spaces. 13. A variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls; over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Grading plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Utility plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped August 17, 2012 • Pedestrian connections plan date stamped August 24, 2012 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of -credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final pedestrian connection plan must be submitted to provide an additional direct pedestrian connection from the apartments to a main Southdale entrance. The final connection plan shall be subject approval of city staff. 17 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated September 7, 2012. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated August 30, 2012. 8. The construction of an eastbound left turn lane at 69«' Street and the Southdale West access Conditional Use Permit to allow the residential use. Recommend that the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow a residential use on this Southdale site. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Edina Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit Criteria. 3. With the exception of the proposed variances, the proposal meets all minimum City Code requirements. 4. The Southdale site is under developed in terms of the allowed (FAR) floor area ratio allowed on the site. The allowed FAR is 1.0. The existing and proposed uses only total .43. 5. The proposed buildings would fit the character of the area. The variety of height and'building sizes blend in well in the area. 6. The traffic study done by WSB and Associates concludes that subject to conditions, the existing roadways and intersections would support the new development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 18 Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Grading plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Utility plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Landscaping plan date stamped August 17, 2012. • Building elevations date stamped August 17, 2012 • Pedestrian connections plan date stamped August 24, 2012 • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of -credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a final pedestrian connection plan must be submitted to provide a direct pedestrian connection from the apartments to a main Southdale entrance. The final connection plan shall be subject approval of city staff. 4. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated September 7, 2012. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the fire marshal in his memo dated August 30, 2012. 8. The construction of an eastbound left turn lane at 69th Street and the Southdale West access 19 Re -Plat of the Southdale Site. Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed re -plat. Deadline for a city decision: December 18, 2012 M City of Edina 7076 v 1ote,� 6.0Q lir NK yta:Y. stat ! 66K Guo 626 Ras Le®end surmu6dirill House Number Il71 ap! 6111 811! 0471 f110664f III Labels Ib �i VIII ftYd 6665 g11616s House Number Labels ar� 1695 i 6506 i" 1 6515 . ,21 2624 lists 6� :treat Name labels .1 Cfgs Umila, /` 2M 7169 C64aki 7250 ,�' O Lake Names I N +1770 "t6 f ,�i 6533 ED Lakes 1677 3016 7006 of a #�' • " O Parks Zonlny 1 Dow � � ! 666! f �j� i e M is K 7f0y 7126 t00 2121 t1�1 .190 Nrlwoeamhl5p lkokD �` ad00 6613 66126617 O NDodyaws DaabP.M Dsddl 6�y� 6ff eats S;fiA ��i✓.° • 66920 f069f4 -n 8627 $620 J2ta so 62SU29 6670 31DD6{Y&af Oerdaym+I Ge4k1) YDD41JAW DWddy 6f7 �,q/lg out 7C0.1fPF•snW CemmxbloWsW) '66 6621 1270 26 B67i1O633 6677 0 i �~tr 10 X �.5 �+ 1664!0664 76. _ 66(6 KR tr69 ►CO•Y(pb .j Ca—WobulA) 100.110+ -s CenOf-0IL410 4ykV 620! /�.o ?[ qOt trK 02060703 trop trios !CO•s{fWCamxa 610Wtpl 6it�6ri�natrtr PID1RmadWuWlmgF2 j 1100 m tr:s ron.tlewew andos ud) -2i 6125 s9 nu PW -SV% dOW Dbnda) 6i0d 660!y. ° KS tr7a 470741 i7j7 aRo't1Pu+.ur R.>;4aalWahldd7 13 6744 PRD•YO+-.d Rmylonl4toidskQ 69x0 1J M^: Gtr tri not PRO -10%..d Rodimlwakuk ) �a0 6921 F, gl6006 13 217212 662 PROd10lnpiltedl4e1WW1) Io0.610bsedHmsrdWotddcll 6641''`'"� N2 r �� 590 3 N I alb: t /N161Rvel6WvDiaAlJ 6901" N 1f 4501061/B,� 690 .. /�•r Kt 690001 is 69201016 10 JJ 98.17 6036 0 1Mi21.21fiegW) .0hsl0sua60nstOg1hs31 1t is 69 7 IF�91P 6921 11.6%'16 J! 6 6911 • 607!16646 6D26 w 6901 §M "I 96969 sm t 121 136917 6913 ■ Pareek N o 4 6974 92tens 6921 y ' 7!!0 69K 226977 s92 710076941 76 69M • 4689 661.4 11167 7001 Yom tam Joao o t 701! 1014 7696 700! 70M 6 3S0} 7021702 w I1s ddifg�jI "JIM 3M 't o7 K72S 29113 ,70 19 Yyew.mhd.4s•taFys�swwr4saw" t/sk K2419t4 4 ?+. PID: 2902824330014; r • .` ©. Edina, MN 55435 t �� .111 Utl A3 r.11" 901 ku MEN --oWpi rsw?R iiAN Was ow . .... . 9W Ar W3. lc-il"t u Oz vs - I i. V'T I'llimlylk $ City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Some. URS A Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights Southeast Quadrant Figure 4.68 o os nuns Et Nonresidential and Description, Land Uses Development Density Mixed Use Guidelines Guidelines 'Categories MXC Established or emerging mixed Maintain existing, or Mixed -Use Center use districts serving areas larger create new, Floor to Area Current examples: than one neighborhood (and pedestrian and Ratio -Per • 501h and France beyond city boundaries). streetscape current Primary uses: Retail, office, amenities; encourage Zoning Code: • Grandview service, multifamily residential, or require structured maximum of institutional uses, parks and parking. Buildings 1.5 open space. "step down" in height 1 -2 Vertical mixed use should be from intersections. units/acre encouraged, and may be 4 stories at 50th R required on larger sites. France; 3-6 stories at Grandview CAC The most intense district in Form -based design Community Activity terms of uses, height and standards for building Floor to Area Center coverage. placement, massing Ratio -Per Example: Greater Primary uses: Retail, office, and street -level current Southdale area (not lodging, entertainment and treatment. Zoning Code: Including large multi- residential uses, combined or in Buildings should be maximum of family residential separate buildings. placed in appropriate 0.5 to 1.0* neighborhoods such Secondary uses: Institutional, proximity to streets to 2 - 3 as Centennial Lakes) recreational uses. create pedestrian units/acre Mixed use should be encouraged, scale.� Buildings "step and may be required on larger down at boundaries with lower -density sites. districts and upper stories "step back" from street. More stringent design standards for buildings > 5 stories. Emphasize pedestrian circulation; re- introduce finer - grained circulation patterns where feasible. I Applies to existing predominantly Performance Industrial industrial areas within the City. standards to ensure Floor to Area Primary uses: industrial, compatibility with Ratio: Per manufacturing. Secondary uses: adjacent uses; ng Code: Zoning limited retail and service uses. screening of outdoor 0.5 activities. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design 4-29 II�PtitAMf aARtktIvE BKV MEMORANDUM G R O U P PROJECT: Southdale Residential Development Archucwre Interior Dc��V TO: Cary Teague, City of Edina Land -,cape Architecture ErtgUteeritV, FROM: David Motzenbecker, BKV Group Soar"n Kroos Vogel CLIENT / FIRM NAME: Stuart Co. COMM. NO.: 1884.01 +up Inc. DATE: 08.17.12 222 Mart}, Secor%J Street Minneapolis. MPJ 55401 '1�te nec 6121II9.375z RE: Project Narrative for Land Use Application Package (Site Plan Review, Eacslmile; 617-3,19-62 1? Variances) - Edina CPC Hearing 9.12.12 and Council Hearing 10.2.12. ww'N.bkvgroup.com EOE SITE PLAN APPLICATION - INTRODUCTION The Southdale Residential Development is anticipated to be a 232 -unit Luxury Rental Apartments and Townhome development on the parcel of land located at the northwest corner of the intersection of W. 69th Street and York Avenue South. The parcels total 223,838 square feet (5.1 acnes) in size and are zoned PCD -3. The current zoning allows 12 stories/144'. We are proposing three buildings — one 3 & 4 story building for townhomes and flats, one at 6 stories/65' and one at 10 stories/11V. We envision 378 parking spaces for the 232 units, inclusive of both resident and guest parking. The development proposes 45 units per acre — a number highlighted by both the Planning Commission and the Southdale Land Use Plan as acceptable — and a Floor Area Ration (FAR) of 1.14. The development is envisioned to meet the demands of young professionals and empty -nesters alike. The City of Edina deserves the alternative of a sumptuous and convenient housing community located in such a key, vibrant district of the city. It offers an option for those who want to stay in Edina, downsize their homes, and be closer to shops, restaurants and activity. This site Is'ground zero' for higher density, more animated and pedestrian -focused residential developments to complement the ongoing improvements that both the city and Southdale Center are implementing. This is where people want to be, and we aim to fulfill this need with a development of exceptional quality and desirability. By adding an enhanced pedestrian realm with connections to both Southdale itself, as well as tying into existing connections south to the Galleria, Target, and Centennial Lakes, this development is acting as a catalyst for turning the focus away from the current auto -centric environment. The proposed development wants to jumpstart a stronger, better -connected, and more walkable pedestrian realm for this area of the city. Enhanced green space on site offers a respite from the surrounding impervious parking lots and creates places to help sustainably infiltrate stormwater. Extensive tree plantings will help clean the air and replenish oxygen. Planned high quality unit finishes including large open floor plans, oversized windows, granite countertops and 9' ceilings. Additional project amenities include green courtyard with outdoor pool, community room, and a cyber cafe. SITE PLAN APPLICATION — CONSISTENCY WITH COMP PLAN We believe this development is a good fit with the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan Update and many of Its guidelines. As the plan states, "redevelopment projects should dynamically respond to the rigors of the marketplace, provide excellence in design and offer clear community benefits.' We feel that adding a development of this density at this location is Incredibly responsive to the current market and will bring public value to the City. The comprehensive pian projects that the acreage of high-density residential will increase from 229 acres in 2010 to 237 acres In 2015. This development will provide approximately 64% of that growth projection with an addition of 5.1 acres. Public value for the City comes from adding 232 units of housing in a vibrant and desirable location that cater to empty -nesters looking to downsize, transit -oriented young people, and families; the Improvement of the under-utilized impervious parking lots with an extensive amount of green spaces, pedestrian connections and amenities. Another question the plan asks is: How can the land use plan foster transportation options for residents and workers who desire an alternative to the private automoble? By zoning this area for the height and mass associated with high-density devekpnent, the city Is creating positive opportunities for transit -oriented developments, such as this, to be put in place. With its location near Hwys. 62, 100 and Interstate 494, the development allows easy vehicular access for those who have cars. However, the site also sits amongst excellent transit options — currently a bus stop exists on the corner of the property, paked with the Park & Ride use of this lot. With the lot moving nearer the JC Penney's, so too will the bus stop, however, the Southdale Transit Center Is close to the site and services 7 different routes (3 express) connecting users to DT Mpis, the U of MN, Bloomington, Richfield, Normandale, MOA, and Eden Prairie. Walkability is also essential to enlivening this location — which is situated near the center of multiple Y4 mile pedestrian catchment areas — as outlined on page 20 In the Greater Southdale Plan. However, pedestrian improvements are necessary. One of the key elements of our site plan is how we are connecting the development to the greater Southdale area. We are planning to add public sidewalks to the York and 69th right-of-ways adjacent to the site. This will help connect our development to existing crosswalks and sidewalks, and to the shops, restaurants and amenities of the area. AA The comp plan points out the needs of Edina's aging population — how can we offer seniors recreational opportunities and a flexible transportation network? Both of these options are met with the proposed development. By siting the development at York and 69th, residents have their choice of numerous restaurants, retail, lifestyle shopping, groceries, movie theaters, and more that are all within a 10-15 minute walk from home. As cited above — the Southdale Transit Center, and frequent bus service along York allows for a flexible, less auto - dependent transportation network. Edina's scarcity of land drives the need to re -use viable, underused parcels in vibrant areas. By redeveloping this particular corner, we are bringing people, tax - base, spending power, green space and vitality to a location that is now an underused parking lot. We hope you would agree that the proposed development Is a higher and better use for such precious land resources, bringing more value to the city in its proposed form. By adding pedestrian connections, proposing reconfigured intersections, and adding extensive landscaping and greenspace; we are hoping to create highly Improved pedestrian realm that is safer and provides better access to the Immediate surroundings. We feel confident that the development, as proposed, meets the following goals of the Future Land Use Plan & Community Design Guidelines (p.21): 1. Protect and preserve the essential character of existing residential neighborhoods. By redeveloping in an area zoned for high-density, we are keeping our development in context with its surroundings and protecting the essential character of surrounding lower -density, single- family neighborhoods. 2. Facilitate the development of new housing and recreation facilities that accommodate the special needs of aging City residents. By siting the development at York and 6P, residents have their choice of numerous restaurants, retail, lifestyle shopping, groceries, movie theaters, and more that are all within a 10-15 minute walk from home. As cited above — the Southdale Transit Center, and frequent bus service along York allows for a flexible, less auto -dependent transportation network. 3. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize the use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. See statements for #1 and #2 above. 4. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. By siting this development adjacent to Southdale, the Galleria, and other surrounding commercial areas - we M anticipate that the residents will, In tum, support the local businesses present nearby. 5. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to Improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. This development has proposed the addition of extensive publicly -accessible sidewalk adjacent to the development on both York and 69th, where there currently Is none. We are also proposing an extension of the sidewalk west along 691h to connect to the existing crosswalk to the Galleria and beyond. This same connection also brings users to one of the Southdale Mall entries. 6. Ensure that public realm corridor design is contextual, respectful of adjacent neighborhood character, supportive of adjacent commercial and/or mixed use development, promotes community Identity and orientation, and creates the highest quality experience for pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users. The proposed development's high-quality design and materials will become an icon for the City, helping to promote community identity and in tum creating an excellent pedestrian environment. 7. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into ab aspects of design, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development Sustainable principles are essential to the quality of the proposed development. There will be extensive stormwater infiltration opportunities via rain gardens and the possibility of pervious asphalt drive lanes; we are exploring the possibility of a "Living Machine" to treat wastewater on-site; we are adding extensive large-scale trees and plantings to help with heatingkooling, evapotranspiration, and the calming effect that green space can have on the human psyche. Building materials will strive for sustainable principles and provenance wherever possible. Continuing on In the comprehensive plan to the section focused on Citywide Movement Patterns and Public Spaces (p.36), we feel that the development, as proposed, meets the following principles: Design public open and green linkages that bring both amenity and positive image to neighborhoods, corridors, and business precincts. This development has proposed the addition of extensive publicly -accessible sidewalk adjacent to the development on both York and 69th, where there currently Is none. We are also proposing an extension of the sidewalk west along 69th to connect to the existing crosswalk to the Galleria and beyond. This same connection also brings users to one of the Southdale Mail entries. These additions will be extensively planted, creating green corridors adjacent to impervious streets. 4( 2. Create walkable streets that foster an active public life, streets are energized by their proximity to a vibrant mix of activity -generating uses. By adding pedestrian connections and greening them, residents have the ability to now walk, unhindered and safely, to their choice of numerous restaurants, retail, lifestyle shopping, groceries, movie theaters, and more. This addition of activity and eyes on the street adds to the energy and vibrancy of the Southdale locale. 3. Protect and improve the urban forest, Including street trees and related landscaping, In order to provide shade and shelter for pedestrians and screening for parking and service uses. The intent is to protectire-use as many of the existing mature trees on-site as is possible. In addition, we propose to add a large number of planted berms, new trees and plantings that will offer pedestrians a safe and calming environment, as well as screening vehicular uses. The development is also reducing impervious surface on site. 4. Create and promote environments that make 4 safe and convenient for people to integrate physical activity into their daily routines. By offering recreational opportunities internal to the development, such as a fitness room and swimming pool; as well as the addition of pedestrian connections to the surrounding city and its amenities, this development Brings the safety and convenience of physical activity to the forefront. 5. Recognize and integrate Edina's historic landscape features, such as its stone walls and gateways, into the design and redesign of streets, paths, and pedestrian ways. The development has taken some cues from Edina's stone walls and is showcasing that material in portions of the building and on-site. 6. Within larger redevelopment sites, promote a fine-grained and interconnected network of local streets and paths, encouraging pedestrian circulation and providing a choice of access points. By adding pedestrian connections and greening them, residents have the ability to now walk, unhindered and safely, to their choice of numerous restaurants, retail, lifestyle shopping, groceries, movie theaters, and more. 7. Within corridors served by existing or planned transit, orient buildings toward sidewalks and paths that lead to mixed use destinations and transit stops. The added pedestrian connections provided by this development offer safe, pleasant, and easy opportunities for residents to access nearby transit stops and mixed-use destinations. 8. Encourage design of building entrances that open up and link directly to sidewalks and pedestrian and bike paths. The proposed development presents a strong central entry court at the corner of York and 69uh that opens directly to the surrounding sidewalk network. All, 9. Open spaces within new development should be attractive, interesting, comfortable, and functional for pedestrians. The proposed development will offer both an internal and external open space environment that acts as an attractive, interesting, comfortable, and functional respite for its users. Additionally, the plan section focused on Buildings, Site Design + Interconnecting Spaces (p.41), we feel that the development, as proposed, meets all five of the principles outlined: Design buildings to provide human scale, interest and variety that will encourage and support a pedestrian -scaled streetscape, as expressed through building massing, fagade articulation, materials and details. The way the building meets the ground, its materiality provide interest and variety. The building design provides a one -level podium level that projects beyond the main building fagade. The podium fagade is differentiated from the upper building through the use of storefront windows and materials. The landscaping mediates the building scale with the pedestrian realm in a thoughtful and unique manner. Z Recognize that diverse architectural styles can be employed to achieve Uy-buiding goals. The proposed development uses a modem architectural style, highlighting traditional building materials of wood, stone, and metal that reflect and complement its surrounding context, while contributing to the Edina's city building goals. 3. Locate and orient buildings to fit with their existing and/orplanned context by framing and complementing adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. The proposed development is located to fit into the existing context of the surrounding Southdale area, orienting the 10 -story and 6 -story buildings parallel with existing adjacent streets and arcing the townhomes to present a pedestrian -scale fagade towards the Southdale parking lot. 4. Locate and orient vehicle parking, vehicular access, service areas and utilities to minimize their visual impact on the property and on adjacent/surrounding properties, without compromising the safety and attractiveness of adjacent streets, parks and open spaces. All surface parking lots and loading for the proposed development are screening with planted earthen berms and/or dense plantings that make up the adjacent streetscape. The site also utilizes the existing curb cut along 69th Street as an access drive that winds around the site, incorporating a second access point at the north end of the site to distribute traffic equally and provide additional access for fire and emergency vehicles. AtJ 5. Regulate scale, massing, and height to provide complementary transitions to adjacent sites and nearby neighborhoods and areas. Scale and massing work in a complementary manner with the Westin to the south and the mass and scale of Southdale to the north and west. Paired with the Westin, the proposed development provides a gateway to 691h and Southdale. The use of 10 -story, 6 -story, and 3- and 4 -story massing allows the development to dramatically bridge the scale of the pedestrian realm up to the taller height of the Westin and the varying project heights directly adjacent to this property. And finally, in the High Density Residential Design (p.45) section focused on a "pedestrian -friendly environment", we feel that the development, as proposed, addresses the following guidelines: 1. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. Permeable hardscape, where appropriate, is preferred over blacktop or traditional paving. Vertical "Irving walls" (trellis, vine -covered fences) are preferable to materials that absorb and reflect heat. 2. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 3. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian -friendly environment along streets. Porous asphalt is being considered to enhance stormwater Infiltration. Surface parking has been consciously placed to the rear and sides of the proposed development and hidden behind planted earthen berms and plantings. Resident parking is found in two underground levels. 4. Design surface parking to maximize stormwater infiltration and allow for groundwater recharge, using infiltration swales, pervious pavement or similar techniques. Porous asphalt is being considered to enhance stormwater infiltration. Rain gardens and green space are also being designed into the project for sustainable infiltration capacity. 5. Use striping, curbs and landscape treatments, centralized walkway medians and Islands, and textured paving to clearly define walking spaces within parking areas and adjacent to vehicular circulation. The proposed development has created strongly defined pedestrian circulation paths around the site, as well as connecting to the front entry, and for residents, to the courtyard. Paving treatments, sculptural walls, and bollards define the boundary between vehicular and pedestrian environments at the main entry drop-off court. "Cuts" through the earth berms offer a unique pedestrian experience as they move about the site. SITE PLAN APPLICATION — CONSISTENCY WITH REQUIRED FINDINGS 1. The development as proposed will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract. We feel that the proposed development will enhance the surrounding properties, bringing more land use diversity and residents to the area enhances the tax base, and the vitality of the surrounding businesses. 2. The development will not result In an overly -intensive land use. The proposed development fits within the zoning code requirements for height and density at this site. 232 units of housing at this site will be a positive addition for the surrounding area. 3. The development will not result in undue traffic congestion or traft hazards. A traffic study is underway to determine the proposed development's impact on the surrounding traffic patterns. At this time we anticipate that the development will not result in undue congestion or hazards to traffic. 4. The development conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code (850.04). The development adheres to the provisions of this Section and other provisions of the Edina City Code. 5. The development provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. The proposed development's scale, massing, site improvements and landscaping create a strong, positive relationship with the surrounding context of the Southdale area. The results will enhance the existing use to a higher and better use that will be a positive contribution to the City and the community. VARIANCE APPLICATION A — FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM YORK AVENUE CONSISTENCY WITH REQUIRED FINDINGS The proposed development is requesting a variance of the required front yard setback along York Ave S from 115 feet to 63 feet for the main building and 42 feet for the podium level. That strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property. Due to the unique triangular shape of the lot, a factor not created by the applicant, practical difficulties exist in the limited amount of building configurations that can be sited on the lot. Currently the development is proposing adding extensive green space and pedestrian amenities along the outer M— edges of the parcel. Strict adherence to the ordinance would limit the footprint available for the building, causing a large elimination of desirable green space on-site. 2. That the granting of the variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Due to the unique triangular shape of the lot, limited amount of building configurations that can be sited on the parcel. Other properties in the vicinity do not have the unique situation of concurrent placement within the outline of the Southdale Mali boundaries. Currently the development is proposing adding extensive green space and pedestrian amenities along the outer edges of the parcel. Strict adherence to the ordinance would limit the footprint available for the building, causing a large elimination of desirable green space on-site and underutilization of the property. The proposed development does not have an adverse impact on the surrounding properties, since it is surrounded by large expanses of parking lots and buffered from other properties by both York and 69th. 3. That the granting of the variance is In keeping with the spirit and Intent of the ordinance. Granting this variance would be In the spirit and intent of the ordinance, as the development is exceeding the setback requirements on the other three sides. The intent of the setbacks is to provide an adequate buffer for taller buildings against the street. The proposed development is creating public pedestrian connections where there currently are none existing. These connections will be extensively landscaped with trees and plantings that will mediate the scale of the podium and building beyond with the pedestrian scale of the walkways. This design keeps the buffering intention of the ordinance, but addresses it in an alternative manner. 4. Would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Granting this variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. In fact, granting this variance would improve the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood and commercial district by providing green space and housing where there is currently an underused surface lot. Similar to Key Cadillac and the recently added CVS across York to the southeast, the proposed development would sit closer to York, reinforcing a strong urban form and helping to create a strong architectural node at the intersection of York and 690,. A(( VARIANCE APPLICATION B — PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR SOUTHDALE CONSISTENCY WITH REQUIRED FINDINGS The proposed development is requesting a variance of the required parking stalls for Southdale from 6,774 spaces to 6,239 spaces — a reduction of 535 stalls. This is effectively the number of stalls that are present on the 5.1 acre parcel slated for the proposed development. 1. That strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property. Due to the 5.1 acre parcel in question being divided from the greater Southdale parcel, practical difficulties exist in that the space for the 535 cars is being subsumed by the new proposed development. There is no ability to replace those spots at other locations on the existing Southdale site without constructing structured parking. 2. That the granting of the variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity orzoning district. Due to the 5.1 acre parcel in question being divided from the greater Southdale parcel, practical difficulties exist in that the space for the 535 cars is being subsumed by the new proposed development. There are not other properties in the immediate vicinity that would need a variance of such size, as they are not parking for a land use such as Southdale. 3. That the granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Granting this variance would be in the spirit and Intent of the ordinance, as the development, In conjunction with Southdale, feels that a reduction in parking adheres to the goals set forth in the comprehensive plan related to advancing a more transit -oriented means of transportation. The lot in question is under-utilized and the loss of 535 stalls out of nearly 7000 would not affect the usability of Southdale. 4. Would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Granting this variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. in fact, granting this variance would improve the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood and commercial district by providing green space and housing where there is currently an underused surface lot. The existing park and ride will be relocated on the Southdale site, so the use would remain and not be altered significantly. 411 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION The Southdale Residential Development is anticipated to be a 232 -unit Luxury Rental Apartments and Townhome development on the parcel of land located at the northwest corner of the intersection of W. 69th Street and York Avenue South. The parcels total 223,838 square feet (5.1 acres) in size and are zoned PCD -3. The current zoning allows 12 stories/144'. We are proposing three buildings — one 3 & 4 story building for townhomes and flats, one at 6 stories/65' and one at 10 stories/115'. We envision 378 parking spaces for the 232 units, inclusive of both resident and guest parking. The development proposes 45 units per acre — a number highlighted by both the Planning Commission and the Southdale Land Use Plan as acceptable — and a Floor Area Ration (FAR) of 1.14. The development is envisioned to meet the demands of young professionals and empty -nesters alike. The City of Edina deserves the alternative of a sumptuous and convenient housing community located in such a key, vibrant district of the city. It offers an option for those who want to stay in Edina, downsize their homes, and be closer to shops, restaurants and activity. This site is 'ground zero' for higher density, more animated and pedestrian -focused residential developments to complement the ongoing improvements that both the city and Southdale Center are implementing. This is where people want to be, and we aim to fulfill this need with a development of exceptional quality and desirability. By adding an enhanced pedestrian realm with connections to both Southdale Itself; as well as tying into existing connections south to the Galleria, Target, and Centennial Lakes, this development is acting as a catalyst for turning the focus away from the current auto -centric environment. The proposed development wants to jumpstart a stronger, better -connected, and more walkable pedestrian realm for this area of the city. Enhanced green space on site offers a respite from the surrounding impervious parking lots and creates places to help sustainably infiltrate stormwater. Extensive tree plantings will help clean the air and replenish oxygen. Planned high quality unit finishes including large open floor plans, oversized windows, granite countertops and 9' ceilings. Additional project amenities include green courtyard with outdoor pool, community room, and a cyber cafe. Granting this subdivision would be in the spirit and Intent of the ordinance, as the development feels that a tradeoff of a luxury, high-density residential development on this comer of the Southdale site for an elimination of a small percentage of impervious surface parking adheres to city goals set forth in the comprehensive plan and outlined previously in this application. This change would allow this developer to Improve the essential character of the surrounding neighborhood and commercial district by providing green space and housing where there is currently an underused surface lot. kA DEVELOPER & DESIGN FIRM INFORMATION StuartCo StuartCo was founded in 1970, and over the past 40+ years has been involved in the development of 10,000 multi -family units, with a portfolio today that includes more than 5,000 units In Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Omaha, NE. We currently own/manage a diverse array of properties including market rate apartments and townhomes, a senior housing campus that includes Memory Care, Independent Living and Assisted Living, affordable housing, and commercial. Local examples of some of our latest work includes: • Genesee - A 234 unit class A project at the comer of Penn and American Blvd in Bloomington, is a three building project -22 townhomes, 60 apartments over retail and 152 units in the 8 story building. All buildings are connected by 2 -story underground parking. The last building comes to market September 2012. • The View -124 unit class A apartments in New Brighton opened July 1st 2012. • York Plaza - StuartCo owns and manages this property of 260 units In Edina, just down the road from the proposed site on York Ave S. • StuartCo also owns/manages 650+units M neighboring Hopkins and Minnetonka. Our investors align themselves with our values to improve both their asset and the quality of life for the residents we service. We are diligent M our approach to deliver experience, consistency, value, and trust to our owners and our residents. Our commitment to these values has earned us a reputation as one of the most respected property management firms in the upper Midwest. We attract highly qualified employees and vendors, and as a result, we retain loyal residents who continue to renew and refer others to StuartCo properties. KV Grow) Boarman Kroos Vogel Group (BKV Group), founded in 1978, is a full-service architectural, interior design, landscape architecture, engineering and construction administration firm with offices located in Minneapolis, Chicago and Washington, DC. Collectively we represent a practice whose expertise is cross -disciplinary and team -focused; and offers our clients a design -oriented approach to create architectural solutions. Knowing that our ultimate responsibility is to our clients, we design and provide services that satisfy the needs of each client's building program, schedule and budget. With each project, our firm continues to grow in breadth and depth, responsiveness and flexibility. As creative design professionals we engage our clients in the process of creating enduring designs that enhance our environment. 4tA Some of those enduring designs can be seen close to hones — Edina City Hall sits at the forefront; a new residential development at West End in St. Louis Park, Silver Lake Village/St. Anthony, and numerous new high-quality developments In Minneapolis — both Downtown and Uptown, such as: 1800 Lake, Flux, Blue, Eitel Building City Apartments, and Mill District City Apartments. 3.1 41 i 6, o �. D F7 CL a- -0 0 w .... - F 1 ZZ 1 r ��- �I Wil` r:�1` ��1�_. !■r AW7 Now" ■�.,� P' i wt mt f- ��` f i r " ai. ye a r�r V& s , ! — y 1 77 r_ ` vw ..-- �- t � . ANN F, ..,OF f awl .:. . Ilk +,aw ilk a .16 __- f ". awl ,, I y .� � r uMW�_ r Ir Big t '--low i■�!wo WW `ice'. � � �. �� • �tr t � . F, IV � r Big t '--low i■�!wo WW `ice'. � � �. �� • �tr � oi■ � �r ■� t t 1 ❑■ I■ �y _ 1 ar r�_ i.I n•. �t w .tilt ®�, �/ ,r,I t � . !ELI-_; l _U'l J�� -Am 7 7, !ELI-_; l _U'l J�� _V=- UktA faCwf__ (r '1r All I r to t i a r .,r H � r r -' :cam —= �� • � _ '', `i 1 .` . i;y. t _ ri �. __._�::_. "i: � �, < � , f � {. �; �S. [ I� 4 g �1 j{ t� ��. I I i� "� �' `, e floW 1 ■ s O � ■ :) 11 1 -E t i mu 1:111 m 'Uhl" � r �tt f o 3 j ,#;3333 3 ) . . h•➢ YY: 57Y Si dd ONS 37Y:7/YOS I hT LCl I It Al- a � � ..I W .WY iq{w�mY tIOWRM iMNLMV p w� U3 - LEY fix; tt tr tt t t �# g� it ! t.t t ljtr; rr j �I It La Y� � til tt' �i t it lilt tji# tl�tR i ft i t �t�1 ( � ��r •� yyrr �trt = � t i [ Il t ft r •� s ►ft jt r la�4..q��t�[,� ° ° �� _• ttt �> ' Pill a t Pill, ��•�i:rtjrti f�— IF fall ' , y�C ,lVP t q� ifiCt sD T . .........q ! 1—� t`E , I n-4 —UM.�.:._ ger t^ I+ I �'i'vRK:i�,AL.� HO now®• { I pip ib�=ixwggqdqbeacsrg=ggqa�qe°qqge�gs . y`� \ � yy(rrPPrr eett(rrrrrrFFt(rrtt{{rrrrrrgttq tt t( {{ttrr�ppjjriirrttrrttppr(`` r( �� .,.. �. � tttii ittftfitTPiEiiitt{i�E�itilgiiiitfiit[f Y �� fitlJit =ill ill 1,rt1}0,;= }#I1tt( iri tst qlfiiit,r r I I a Vo o m, Rf fill, i TT 41 --- -- , ►- '03) 3AV NaoA —hii ■� ! i It Pzff Pal b � Ion 1 00 Ili i I h a I9 h3� mama n`.w s u"�` ..mi �°`e. ««. � wna... or w ms �lwnmmmimw «'Rrrm �.e m4 w m oat •snow Mj rm"oP.r`rR mw rwvxl SNMIA/PFRFNNML PLANNNG BFVVIS BKV G R O U P Ardikca- kltabr Deiv Vaad G -o bl 272 Nath Se d Sbod Min apart MN smi T lephona 612-339-3792 Faamia 612-339-6212 —.bkvZ,.up. awe SSTUAw BaIR' 1nN �sn�r LANDSCAPE DETAILS L103 rr wa.wrmr VIIIhim M11,11io��; till Jill AI -3 • R _ ..nom 0 lilt.. ❑las W V csnm oxo yr r.-r-.� �• 3 sill 3lfl i >l i it � li 8 l2, {i 0g { rligqlll y>!}}Ci tiNgg l ylqq[$ Est k 33 l/l '1s 1{li 1I � an aq ,- 3�-C (l£ ;CiT�•.:Da^'OO a b'" �210A _ ry� l2, M ell 6{3 ells i i I i I I I i I I i i ■ y( o _ ` S I _ mai 2,i \ . Y ii � i • `�{ .. nnx I SI � JR� 1 F t yl �J •� T � lisp y { 1 l \• rj a 11 i { i 3 sill 3lfl i >l i it � li 8 l2, {i 0g { rligqlll y>!}}Ci tiNgg l ylqq[$ Est k 33 l/l '1s 1{li I SI � JR� 1 F t yl �J •� T � lisp y { 1 l \• rj a 11 !11!1111 tg fill g �jlg l q i ll 4111 @#ill #�s � 0g R1Y e�:l Vill 1A1 l2, 1i{ Est k !11 l/l '1s 1{li 111 133 R!1 ylt Q ; slit Alf 2,is�l 61112, y�I itisl5 �S'I3E3 y; x!! '411 y i��:l 'tlti q i ll 4111 sg1l �i�E 12,1 �� iii qQ ir��:l '132,3! ell bol &1x ii e�:l Vill ; S�yliE1 tolls �i 4�i 'it 1Al t{2, e�l bill gg efl bit RRt��I � i li ltR v{3 liL '12, 6 e1l bli S ell L{i R�n s5il bili ry� l2, M ell 6{3 ells i i I i I I I i I I i i i Ii Q I i - 'it b{i e.il blas R� ill Yll �E� V1111 bilis pf65" bolsi ,1'.1 j�E V It toil @�� i�iil 612,2,2, 6E� i�til 61333 R16H 35ii1 bolsi E� i�il ilii it i5i bot iE� sill 6133 &��R y; li Ri a{l b1E 6pE6 Fill 1113 REE 1111 6133 E� 9�i1 b{it �y8� sail boss 366 a ill boils 6 e�l bl2, 6 e1l bli S ell L{i R�n s5il bili ry� l2, M ell 6{3 ells i i I i I I I i I I i i i Ii I ii i Ii I i - BKV G R O U P Ard*KtLn y"w Gu* km 222 North Scald Street K-$** MN Sol Tdvham 612-9391-3752 Fannie 612-M-6212 www.bkv3roup— cennbnwra ■ uh NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I 1 baLLVl[a 08-19'12 ,•• rPAiEfaLL SOUTHDALE HOUSING Elf oabwuea aax«w b Q ..rabr..rb.+wraa...r ■ uh BKV G R 0 U P vsd G -o Ire: 222 Wrth S—W Std Mh-. . MN 55901 Tdept-M 612-339-7752 FwA ie 612-339-6212 w bkrcroup.aom ovauuwm O NOT FOR N-7 moo - 6 .. 1 coo k O o 1 n A4 -O BKV G R O U P Mdf .K- V"d c~ Inc 222 NMI, sewd steal N hid 55401 Tdq*— 612-339-3152 faoinlm 6I2-339-6212 NOT FGR CONSTRUCTION W13-12 SOUTHOALE HOUSING II a i I I I 2nd a 3rd FLOOR PLANS O Al A104 cT .a......irY O 1 BKV G R O U P Ard* clue hharior Design Md,itecnee Wed Inc. m N lh semw suss M""""are MN ssml Telso— 612-339-3752 FxdnxYe 612-339-6212 —.bk.grollp.— NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08-1312 r.aGefSOUTHDAL.E HOUSING o,ec�.r..xo sacrane 51i MW 61h FLOOR A105 & A106 N ~ (z coo I I 0 0 Q H /M ---------o II� di ca co ---------o II� amp v O bb�b Q amp v O bb�b 0 �, BKV G R O U P Prd*eMm 0 aml owir V"A Yea N.% Seo.W Sliver apok MN 55401 . , . 612-339-3752 T& 612-339-6212 r.bkvgr—p.c NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 08-19-12 SOUTHDALE HOUSING ERRO h �ewwrl�r�eYrM��i�i� 1YYe�I�Yp area®w aevnau ROOF PLAN ARP BKV G R O U P A.hkab e h"ewDdpi L.W-" A tmed— vesel G'oop Ir. 222 Nwh SeMW S"d Tekplwea 612-339-3752 Fwftl : 612-339-6212 —.bkvg,00p.— NOTFOR CONSTRUCTION 0&13-12 nnc SOUTHDALE HOUSING —6s Tf woCl «o .er,ma ENTRYIp U13 ROOM FLOORPLAN A rii — 00 mw swowa�a� BKV G R O U P MdAKti- kk.ior D dr V-9-4 G -P Inc 332 NoM SomW SVW K. -PA MN SS401 TeloP— 612-339-3757. FA.imlc 612-339-6212 —.bkr=rouP.orn moutwn NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION oe-13-12 AIGRGf11NC SOUTHDALE HOUSING IWr..yMK�r�Y. �w.�NAYYr�rrrnl .rrrrw.rrrrrrr m m arnmu: ■. ■1■ ► �MINI MRR "M :m�RON. Eli, ipea •n e 1 6' ■ r� ;lam i am W � � �9 w �t`:.Ir� �3 � ■:jam 1 -1 C1 :1 :1 M1 21 If__ 1 ON�ME M1 ON Ml MI IM 1 i3 i � i51■� jil.MRNOR =I: *411. WIN ■ ■ i Milk i s i li L1 mIvnmf ={ un �I■moi �If �r �1 NSI, ■�. Oak— ■�I lrI 6WH' =I kiiiIi. � 1 j((�1 �1� �1 �1 ■ill iml; i11� Ml nil I�1 �1�� I.II, �l .l MI ■II' I= .1 .I .I ■11: 1 [.. 1 ..t 1M1 n1� _I( il 1l slim! NMI NOR I(Tww1 ■ill NMI mil ■ill,. I�1 _SII 1•� �1 sill. NMI mli Milli NOR 1IMI1 Iwjt W'� I MI MI El i�1WII,�l nl, I �1 it won oRw1 iiltz: NMI Now1 welpiwil6wIL o 1 .1 IE E v�.l .l Ca NMI monA NMI NORILIM Ma! wal fi ....... t%OT3 9 00"'1 NMI MM1'L1= =I mini! :3 ■i,1 MI !� ml�i�Ij MINI 1m MINI Ike lifi'It wl iii me , IS I 1 IM,; ■.. P ■ ig is i' i i if.■. i xi yi i i il;-■* RIM ORM .1 -.NONNI N� :1:1a1C1CMCI =tNil =I iij;m1 =I it iC ■MA =1 1•I„=1 MINI =I M1 NMI may[ �FI �1 �I �1 A•1 MI E4 =� �l �1 �l �I •tel MI -,l :I :1 Nil =lI ,a 1 =CM1 I M-1 IN $MEIi1 M -1I V11111 M- umv�mv'wwf Nown, mini NOR NMI ,iNNl m1 ®1 =9 ■11 � o i r li v .,_,j , i AI 1?�f �1 I.1;i�1 eilrc!�1 ■11 ..M MI M11.11:11:1 i, .I it wl imo 1 M1 -1 nil I 1 i.�i,.i =["'M �A ii�:i i�� i i i ' i!'i i ion MIRMI M1 i MINI MR YI mi EspIE-iI i OI al ■il A •j i '.i i INNER � i i i' i i ■� �iii IIni z! M!■1-111 In _relB1� �'� �IL`�11`!I tll X11 !I ■■1 i6ii _,i :,• lME �1 �1 �1 �1' �1 MMINEI ��•,t��tfi�k W -P. ps-. W—P. mpg" �lr� rel rel IIM1 r■ ! ! ! Mll ! Z Mw� ■� 1 1110M Mai � i MII1 i MEN ■� _ �� r� r■ w1! .( ■rMM %! M�. 1. ! ■ur• 11'riI rut M]"onif NMI 11.1 1&1 :1 :1'01, ,1 01 1■1 1110M Mai � i MII1 i MEN ■� _ 1� 1.� �.._■■ [[nowe Mc�.. !i! Ml11_wM1 Mal paa; a -1 oll � rIC�1 �1 i r_ .— �G t 3,— 1=1 r1 ��1 �11.I a .n =1 ,.l err! ! ice■ ! ! moi! !r ■u ! ! rr1 -- k -�_ �MEN! �1 ffl Mor ®1 6 a k 1`1 _ fl 1 eu f"1F, m ne i 1 � ue 1'�1 1-1 III k , .. I._ 1...._._ 11[, :.. _k 111 111 _ ::. u� eii 1 1" ui 1 mss. 11. 111_ ..E_ __=111 [ ulll 111 oe. `.itnl .e. .e. a _e- w EI 11 111; 1 1 Illtll 1WIv Ilt r1 I NINE i�llit Ill 1',1 !_t iii ;1 .e.1 f l 1 'en 'I'm 11"11 Illi lIM 1 1 !Illi Ilt 1't 11111 E! .': x'11 iei :'i ; ! 111f7:- 1..1 Illi X111 ITI S MEMO now ME. MM MIEN '•!'..= n "iii C`A i6=••■li '•'" BKV G R O U P Ilii iIMWtl �� .IwMY�MY.w..I.•.� sAA c'^ vurmmw- A503 ... .. RPM ... i!11 ►nr, S All !11 fluX11111i!��11 �� :��+1 ! 11� n� inr f 11 u . mot -r; + ��i,. �- g --�.. �-='!' :--E■r■ !te�..E��::; im °_ter... ..��e ,: rf yj7 gg"ji ff, �Afi Ilii iIMWtl �� .IwMY�MY.w..I.•.� sAA c'^ vurmmw- A503 x 1 . EEgg a FD � ,aFP EDINA ?�� LIQUOR �.. ,. .. CUB h, SOUTHDALE . ` MALL k CHIPOTLE : 1 � KEY CADILLAC West 69th Street CVS WESTIN GALLERIA WALGREENS West r70th Street LIBRARY 1 if kf#23 •. �'i$ L3' t +Fdg i y Hazeltine Road .�rTO CENTENNIAL LAKES y ��' c' EDINA LIQUOR CUB SOUTHDALE MALL CHIPOTLE �r ;, KEY CADILLAC '�1'►. West 69t1i Street ' CVS WALGREENS LIBRARY 7tF l A JS Lj t t � p. Y 'Mj; II w .-., . .. ._...• :: r. rte.. 3 'E C AL / SB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction & Aswcfates. /m. Memorandum DATE: September 4, 2012 TO. Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering City of Edina FROM. Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE. Southdale Residential Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686-34 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541.4800 FaX 763 6414700 Background The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed addition of the Southdale Residential apartments would have on the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking, site circulation and the adjacent roadway system. The site is located in the northwest quadrant of 69th Street and York Avenue. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed plan includes the addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the existing Southdale Shopping Center parking lot. Existing access to this area of the Southdale Shopping Center is through two existing 3/4 movement intersections and one right -in only intersection on 69th Street and one site entrance and one site exit intersection on York Avenue. The Southdale Residential project is proposing to modify the access on 69`i' Street adding a right - out at the location of the current right -in access, and modifying the existing south exit driveway on York Avenue to a full movement intersection. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed development were evaluated at the following locations. • York Avenue and 66th Street • York Avenue and Southdale site entrance and exit intersections • York Avenue and 69th Street • 69th Street and Southdale site right in only driveway • 691h Street and Southdale site east and west entrance intersections • 69th Street and France Avenue • Southdale site ring road and Southdale access driveway from 69`h Street • Southdale site ring road and Southdale access exit driveway to York Avenue The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. ko Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 2 of 15 Existing Traffic Characteristics The existing lane configuration and traffic control include: York Avenue (CSAH 31) is north/south a 4 -lane divided `B" Minor Arterial roadway. Primary access to York Avenue is by local streets and development driveways. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 30 mph. 69th Street is an east/west City 4 -lane divided collector roadway. Access to adjacent developments including the Southdale Shopping Center and the Galleria is provided from this roadway. The speed limit posted on 691h Street is 30 mph. The lane configurations at each of the study area intersection are as follows: York Avenue at 66th Street - Traffic Signal control SB York Ave approaching 66'h St — one free right, two through, one left NB York Ave approaching 66th St — one free right, two through, two left EB 66'h St approaching York Ave — one free right, two through, two left WB 66th St approaching York Ave — one free right, two through, two left York Avenue at Southdale Site Entrance — Sidestreet Stop Sign control SB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one right, two through NB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one continuous right, two through, one left WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one right out only York Avenue at Southdale Site Exit — Traffic Signal control SB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — two through, one left NB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one right, two through EB Site Entrance approaching York Ave — one right/through, two left WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one right, two left York Avenue at 69th Street — Traffic Signal contro SB York Ave approaching 69th St — one through/right, three through, one left NB York Ave approaching 69th St — one right, three through, one left EB 691h St approaching York Ave - one through/right, one left WB 69'h St approaching York Ave — one right, one through, one left 691h Street at Southdale Right -In Only— No Traffic control EB 69'h St approaching Site Access — one through/right, one through 69'h Street at East Southdale / Galleria Site Access — Sidestreet Stop Sign control EB 691h St approaching Site Access — one through/right, one through, one left WB 69th St approaching Site Access — one through/right, one through, one left SB Southdale Access approaching 69'h St - one right only NB Galleria Access approaching 69th St - one right only M Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 3 of 15 69`h Street at West Southdale / Galleria Site Access — Sidestreet Stop Sign control EB 69th St approaching Site Access — one through/right, one through WB 69th St approaching Site Access — one through/right, one through, one left SB Southdale Access approaching 69'h St — one right, one through/left NB Galleria Access approaching 69th St — one right/through/left 69th Street at France Avenue — Traffic Signal control EB 69`h St approaching France Ave — one right, two through, one left WB 69`h St approaching France Ave — one free right, two through, one left SB France Ave approaching 69'h St — one free right, three through, one left NB France Ave approaching 69'h St — one free right, three through, one left PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts and daily hourly approach counts were conducted during the weeks on July 8`h — 21'% 2012. AM peak hour counts were previously conducted by Hennepin County at the intersections along France Avenue. The AM peak hour counts were found to be 20% to 25% lower than the PM peak or Saturday peak counts. Therefore, only the PM and Saturday peak hours were analyzed with this study. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. Figure 3 shows the existing intersections and driveways along each corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study. Figure 4 shows the existing 2012 PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. The traffic count data is included in the Appendix. Background (Non Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions (2012) and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. However, in order to account for some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period was used to project traffic to the 2014 and 2030 analysis years. In addition to the regional background traffic, other specific none development related traffic was determined and included with the overall background traffic. Additional Southdale Mall Development - Based on the information received from Southdale Center about the current vacancy rates and plans for renovations, it was determined that following the renovations, the mall would have and additional 143,880 sf of leasable space available. This figure includes leasable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all leasable space occupied by 2014 and that the background trip generation for the mall property was the same for the 2014 and 2030 analysis. A�q Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 4 of 15 Future Restaurant Development — A future restaurant is proposed in northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 69a' Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 sf in size with approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will be developed by 2014 and that the background trip generation for the restaurant will be the same for the 2014 and 2030 analysis scenarios. The estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation rates used to estimate the additional site traffic are based on extensive surveys of the trip -generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manzral, 8`h Edition. The table shows the PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. Table I - Estimated Additioizal Background Trip Generation Use Sizes PM Peak Hour Satur ay Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Shopping Center 143,880 537 263 274 704 366 338 Restaurant Total New Tris 8000 90 627 53 316 37 311 113 817 60 426 53 391 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition Development Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed Southdale Residential project is shown below in Table 2. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The table shows the PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. In addition, it was assumed that all the traffic from the site would be new and that no adjustments were made for dual purpose or pass-by/diverted trips. This also will provide for a worst case traffic condition. Table 2 - Estimate(l Development Site Trip Generation Use:T232 Size nits PM Peak Hour Saturda. Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Apartments 82 50 32 93 53 40 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 8th Edition AP Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 5 of 15 Trip Distribution Site -generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve it. In general the Trip Distribution was assumed, 30% to the north, 40% to the south, 15% to the east and 15% to the west. Additional Southdale Center background trips were distributed to 66th Street, 69th Street, York Avenue, or France Avenue based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. Where one of the adjacent roadways had multiple entries or exits into the mall property, entering or exiting volumes were evenly split across both locations. The generated trips for the future restaurant development were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on France Avenue or 69`h Street, and were assigned based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. The generated trips for the proposed Southdale Residential development were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on 69th Street or York Avenue, and were assigned based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2014 which is the year after the proposed site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. Four improvement alternatives were evaluated. 1. Existing — Assuming existing lane configurations and traffic control 2. No Build — Assuming existing lane configurations and traffic control 3. Build Alternative 1— Proposed roadway improvements from the development site plan including: a right-in/right-out on 691h Street; full movement access on York Avenue, and; revisions to the Southdale Center circulation roadway adjacent to the development. Figure 5 shows these improvements. 4. Build Alternative 2 — Proposed roadway improvements including two full movement roundabouts on 69`h Street. Figure 6 shows these improvements. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non -development traffic growth to the existing 2012 traffic counts to determine the "No -Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated Southdale Residential development traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 7-12 shows the projected 2014 and 2030 No -Build and Build PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. A7I Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 6 of 15 Traffic Operations Existing and/or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the intersections and access point on 69th Street and York Avenue. The analysis was conducted for the following scenarios. 1. Existing 2012 Conditions 2. Projected 2014 No Build 3. Projected 2014 Build Alternative 1 4. Projected 2014 Build Alternative 2 5. Projected 2030 No Build 6. Projected 2030 Build Alternative 1 7. Projected 2030 Build Alternative 2 This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. Analysis Metlrodolon The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Mamra12000 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity, and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection. At a stop sign -controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all -way stop, or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through -street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un -signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The threshold LOS values for un -signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes, changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric nnprovements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. A /. Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 7 of 15 Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning -movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro -simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. A13 Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un -Signalized A :510 <10 B 10-20 10-15 C 20-35 15-25 D 35-55 25-35 E 55-80 35-50 F >80 >50 Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning -movement volumes, lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro -simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. A13 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 8 of 15 Existine Level ofService Summary Table 4, below, summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, traffic control and traffic volumes. The table shows that all intersection are operating at an overall LOS D or better during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours with all movements operating at LOS E or better. A table showing the LOS and delays by approach is included in the Appendix. Table 4 - Existing Level of Service Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 38 C (E) 27 York Ave at Southdale Entrance A (B) 4 A (A) 4 York Ave at Southdale Exit C (E) 22 B (D) 19 York Ave at 69th St C (E) 32 C (E) 29 69th Stat Southdale Right -In A (A) 2 A (A) 2 691h St at Southdale East Access A (A) 2 A (A) 3 691h St at Southdale West Access A (C) 5 A (D) 7 69th St at France Ave C (E) 30 C (E) 26 Mail Circulation Rd at (69thSt) East Access A (A) 3 A (A) 2 Mall Circulation Rd at Park n Ride A (A) 1 A (A) I Mall Circulation Rd at (York Ave) South Access A (A) 1 A (A) 1 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Forecast Tiafitc Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2014 which is the year after the proposed Southdale Residential site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 5 - 7. Detailed tables showing the LOS and delays by approach are included in the Appendix. A-?� Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 9 of 15 Table 5 —No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. However, with the increase in traffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. Overall delays will also increase slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, especially at the major intersections at 66th Street and York Avenue, York Avenue and 69th Street and 69th Street at France Avenue. Table 5 — No Build Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (1)) = worst movement LvO 00UNG. Tr UL w =.,....,, Al S- 2014 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour LOS Delay (S 11) LOS Delay sec/veh) LOS Delay sec/veh LOS Delay (sec/veh York Ave at 66" St D (E) 38 C (E) 32 D (E) 43 C (E) 33 York Ave at Southdale A (B) 4 A (B) 5 A (B) 4 A (B) 5 Entrance York Ave at Southdale C (E) 22 C (E) 29 22 C (E) 30 Exit York Ave at 69th St D (E) 36 D (E) 38 FD(E) 38 D (E) 40 69 St at Southdale A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Right -In 69t St at Southdale East A (A) 3 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 Access 69 St at Southdale West A (C) 6 A (E) 10 A (D) 6 B (E) 10 Access 69th St at France Ave C (E) 30 C (E) 29 C (E) 31 C (E) 30 Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 3 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 A (A) 2 69th ;t)East Access Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 A (A) 1 Park n Ride Mall Circulation Rd atA (A) 1 A (A) 2 A (A) 1 A (A) 2 ork Ave South Access . r _n O_......,.. 11700 Q. AO ^*,q*PQ inn C = Overall LOS, (1)) = worst movement LvO 00UNG. Tr UL w =.,....,, Al S- Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 10 of 15 Table 6— Build Alternative 1, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, except the York Avenue intersection with the revised full movement access to Southdale, which will be operating at an overall LOS E in 2030. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2014 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the no - build condition. At the intersection of 69th Street and the Southdale East access the projected 2014 eastbound left turn volume from 69th Street into the mall is 320 vehicles during the weekday PM peak hour. Although the LOS and delays do not indicate an issue, the rule of thumb for considering additional improvements is 300 vehicles per hour in a left turn lane. Currently there is no eastbound left turn lane provided at the 691h Street and Southdale West access intersection. Adding an eastbound left turn lane at the Southdale West access would distribute the traffic between the two access locations, providing a low cost solution to improve this potential issue. Table 6 — Build Alternative I Level of Service L = Overall LUS, (ll) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. k-76 2014 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh(sec/veh) Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) York Ave at 66`h St D (E) 38 C (E) 32 FD(E) 43 C (E) 33 York Ave at SouthdaleA Entrance (B) 5 A (B) 5 () 5 A (C) 7 York Ave at Southdale Full Movement Access D (E) 43 D (E) 49 D (E) 50 E �) 58 York Ave at 69`h St D (E) 36 D (E) 38 D (E) 38 D (E) 40 69 St at Southdale Right-In/Right-out A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A A ( ) 2 69` St at Southdale East Access A (A) 3 A (A) 4 A (A) 3 A (A) 4 691St at Southdale West Access A (C) 6 A (E) 9 A (D) 6 A (E) 10 69th St at France Ave C (E) 30 C (E) 29 C (E) 31 C (E) 30 Mall Circulation Rd at 69th St East Access A (A) 3 A (B) 3 Mall Circulation Rd at ment DrivewaMall A (A) 2 A (A) 2Develo FA(D) Circulation Rd at (York Ave) South Access B (C) 12 A (D) 13 14 C (D) 15 L = Overall LUS, (ll) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. k-76 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 11 of 15 Table 7— Build Alternative 2, has similar results as Build Alternative 1 showing that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2014 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, except the York Avenue intersection with the revised full movement access to Southdale, which will be operating at an overall LOS E in 2030. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2014 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the no- build condition. Table 7 — Build Alternative 2 Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. 01 2014 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh sec/veh sec/veh) sec/veh York Ave at 66"' St D (E) 39 C (E) 32 D (E) 43 C (E) 33 York Ave at Southdale A (B) 5 A (B) 4 A (B) 5 A (B) 6 Entrance York Ave at Southdale D (E) 43 D (E) 47 D (E) 50 E (E) 55 Full Movement Access York Ave at 69th St D (E) 36 C (E) 33 D (E) 38 C (E) 34 69th St at Southdale A (A) 4 A (C) 4 A (A) 4 A (C) 5 Right -In / Ri ht -Out 69 St at Southdale East A (A) 6 A (B) 7 A (A) 6 A (B) 7 Access - Roundabout 69 St at Southdale West A (A) 5 A (A) 6 A (A) 5 A (A) 6 Access - Roundabout 69th St at France Ave D (E) 40 D (E) 35 D (E) 40 D (D) 37 Circulation Rd at Mall St East Access (69th A (A) 3 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 Mall Circulation Rd at A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 A (A) 2 Development Driveway Mall Circulation Rd at A (D) 16 A (C) 10 A (D) 16 B (C) 11 York Ave South Access C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. 01 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 12 of 15 Vehicle OuettineAnalysis A queuing analysis for the existing and future 2014 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queuing impacts at the intersections in the study area. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffic simulation software. The results found that during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, for the existing, and future no -build and build 2014 and 2030 conditions, the average queues in the corridors do not exceed any of the available turn lane storage. In some cases however, the maximum queues were exceeded. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that was observed during the analysis period. The observations were typically identified one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 to 4 seconds. In most cases the queues exceed the storage in left or right turn lanes adjacent to a multiple lane roadway (2 or 3 through lanes) therefore not impacting through traffic. Tables showing the average and maximum queue lengths by movement and approach are included in the Appendix. Parking Impact Analysis The parking impacts to the existing Southdale Shopping Center site were analyzed based on the proposed changes in uses on the site including: the additional mall area; proposed restaurant outiot, and; proposed Southdale Residential project. Table 8 below shows a summary of each use, the exiting parking provided, parking required based on City Code and the estimated parking needs based on accepted parking generation studies. Tahto R —Site Parking Summary v Existing Parking from Proposed Parking from Parking from Use Size City Code Size City Code ITE Southdale Retail 1,368,523 sf 6843 1,194,731 sf 5974 5529(1) Southdale Restaurants 2059 seats 206 1657 seats 166 NA Southdale Theater 3959 seats 396 3447 seats 345 NA Restaurant Outlot NA 0 300 seats 30 105 Apartment Development NA 0 232 units 232 318 Total Parking Spaces 7445 6747 5952 Required Total Parking Spaces 6686 6442 6442 Provided Parkin Variance Required 759 305 Not Required 1 t 1 328 850 sA (I)— Includes mall restaurants and theater area but not the future restaurant out o ( , , As indicated in Table 8, the existing parking provided on the Southdale Center site is 6686 spaces with a 759 space parking variance. This variance was approved through City Council resolution (2000-123) in December 2000. h-7$ Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 13 of 15 Currently with the planned mall renovation the seating in the Southdale Center restaurants and theater, the sizes are actually reduced from the approved parking resolution. With the proposed changes to the site including the future restaurant outlot and the Southdale Residential project, 6442 total parking spaces would be provided. This includes 6100 spaces on the Southdale Center site and 342 spaces associated with the Southdale Residential project. Based on City Code the site would require 6747total spaces requiring a variance for 305 spaces. In addition anticipated parking demand for the site was determined. The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4'h Edition. Table 8 shows the results of the parking demand analysis. It should be noted that the parking generation rates used for the Southdale Retail was based on a shopping center use which includes the restaurant and theater uses within the mall. The rates used for both the shopping center and restaurant outlot were for a peak weekend (Friday or Saturday) event in December, which represents a worst case condition. Based on this analysis, only 5952 parking spaces would be needed on the Southdale Center site, which would not require a parking variance. Conclusions /Recommendation Based on the analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed Southdale Residential project includes the addition of 232 apartment units. The site is anticipated to generate 82 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 93 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Additional trips will be generated from vacant and renovated Southdale Center mall space and a proposed new Restaurant outlot. These uses will generate an additional 627 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 817 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Existing traffic operations at the intersections and driveways on York Avenue and 691h Street are operating at overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour.. • Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2014 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • Two build alternatives were analyzed. Build Alternative 1 included a right-in/right-out on 69th Street and a full movement access from York Avenue to the Southdale site. Build Alternative 2 included roundabouts for the two Southdale site access locations on 69th Street. • Intersection traffic operations for both Build alternatives in 2014 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better, except the new full movement access to Southdale Center from York Avenue which would operate at an overall LOS E in 2030. k7 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 14 of 15 • The eastbound left turn movement from 69th Street into the mall at the Southdale East access is projected to be 320 vehicles during the weekday PM peak hour in 2014. Providing an eastbound left turn lane at the 69th Street and Southdale West access would be a low cost solution to improve this potential issue. • The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact on intersections or access locations will occur as a result of the proposed full build conditions in 2014 or 2030. • The existing or proposed available parking does not or will not meet the City's Code. A 759 parking space variance is currently in place for the existing Southdale Center site. With the current and proposed changes to the Southdale site, 6747 parking spaces would be required based on City Code. The current plan provides for 6442 parking spaces. This would require a variance for 305 parking spaces. • Based on ITE parking generation estimates the total parking required for the Southdale Center site is 5952 spaces. With this estimate, no parking variance would be required. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Provide the proposed roadway improvements as shown on the proposed site plan (Build Alternative 1). 2. Construct an eastbound left turn lane at 69`h Street and the Southdale West access. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed Southdale Residential project or future restaurant outlot. Ob Southdale Residential Project City of Edina September 4, 2012 Page 15 of 15 APPENDIX � � Traffic and Parking Study Southdale Residential Project City of Edina, Minnesota �Ii Figure 1 Project Location Map BKV m . oAou► qL 'i IN 7 � h SIM f^i11wt 14 f � wow tww.�arr — —tea r..7 anruw 3� s, C3.1 c„ , y,. Traffic and Parking Study Figure 2 e Southdale Residential Project • •� City of Edina, Minnesota Development Site Plan A- �� Future Water Treatment Site Future Resteraunt Site 71 I Metro Transit Site I qt: ---- Intersection], 0 Analyzed With SNOY Traffic and Parking Study Figure 3 Southdale Residential Project City of Edina, Minnesota Southdale Development Plan f�qoi Feet 0 250 500 1,000 R S� ! a e:tN E • R . mWQ N J j 1. r A entaq Ifgm , % t r a 31.1 J j l r e(a u•+ + t r a a (•''' � t r (ae+ . I+e N — r s e SIa _ r J j a r it* (ae a NSN > f MIND e(a J 1 • r m(fq I NIN + \ t j3 ! a N(N+ a a(al a u1N a 0114 R. a altq sISNq E F s .. m(fa y T T e- ewleN : T r .. mNs4 E @ O •' s<N mine J j r mm J j r aleq J j r •(q J 1 16 r step twin t r (a•+ 'k t r (uqm� 1 j r (a•+ s t/ tu+Igs + f r (0.1m .. a ' • (INfe .. ' ' s (+s+m .. • • • a ! !! r r! r s s SNIII -. Q R IN4m 's — INu N — — 1440 N _ — — r. las a — (NgIN ,a Traffic and Parking Study Figure 4 3 Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) EXISTING 2012 City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes R Feet 0 2S0 500 1,000 r S R ` 6(34 N < t(a ■` � a .- suite s e � � r el A itroas •+, — J} i � ssia J} l r salA Ise+ 1 t r (ae+ s s s lees e — (ae •a � g < Ns7 E • ela < a(a/ /� tae •� � � R 1 } S r msw tae+ 1 t r lass+ i t Iass � a J ! � e sofas I,w» 1 k < aettw ` nstw < ,(,e < at» e._ as(Nio 'W E a,taA —W :a(aA g r r • ascu J 1 � r astral J l<< ata „(ro J} �� e(a J r •(w t r mw+} r tae + t r lesaw + t r (»a+ t r : Isro,a .. W s Iaslas 1 — laa 7 V: lee 11w1s � � 13R 11 Issasw a Traffic and Parking Study Figure 7 ,F x Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2014 NO BUILD City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes A'" Feet_ _� A 0 250 500 11000 i S i • Ulm N A J { t f mlw Iw6 + ie� t ♦ a tl W . 114 snsns0 " g — � J ! t r 917a J { t e 1«uw 14 • + 1 t ♦ 179« ! • A ta•.. s 1919 1 — (+•' • • ` a i(al • u a J i t f Na ut+ i f r r r r ^ 1x1119 ♦ 1+ 0 i : _ J { t r «(7+ 140+ 1 1 lot i ! a 1«11M 1094 9/W J j ♦ f Iai«9 1491" + t r (74« — + ! �Y { R f m(.4 j t1t(«9 s 97/aa R a ` MOM � Q � � I«Iw J{ t r Immi J j t r ala J{ t r my J{ t r Na J j t r 4lW 109x+ 1 1 r (40+ i t r t71+9s+ fi t♦ 1x0+ 1 t r Imlw+ 1 1 (•Wt• .� _ f n79W .� !. ` (wrs r t . e (a%- I1t91« 7 — Jt (919 1 — (1aM \ R F (at r e Traffic and Parking Study Figure 8 L Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2014 BUILD ALT 1 City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 0 Feet } 0 250 500 1,000 II II a •(q s •- aytzq ri J j � r s»nq A 1•Lw + t r a el6 a e<a Iz+azn+ E II • II t E (aam J j v r uta ! j 4 r ,•azey lye+ 1 t r lye .r S i! Izssn-. * las-. e • IWe 1— Iqs 1® ... II E r a stq [t • «eca J 1 \ r eta lye + S f f a else e r • � Iae "• J J L r MIN las + \ t r t25136' a Inlay teas s — R !! «. eI•I J J ♦ r w11ea halts + 1 t r (lab �y R E i 4 t Mtsp a wits" a Inl,za a e(a E E R a •Iza R E E II II II• B !? c c nlh•) r A 6 « n,tz+9 � a s •• nstzea J J� r whal J J t r eta J J � r sty» J l� r eta J j � r eha Pae + 1 t r in + 'I t! hWte + 1 t! laid + s f r (naw + 1 t r Htatu .. Is,gns •. i II t loges, .. e s r IzBn, .. #E • IMzs (qe v 4 l,Ww � las ♦ � Itel,• � — u +a Traffic and Parking Study Figure 9 Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2014 BUILD ALT 2 City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Feet � t ! R a a1M 0 250 500 1,000 9 ! k S •• 9s(tsa N J i l e 49Pr Aa N • a 914 Its9ns -. !i R !) • • . E - - wix4 : � # « �1 • Itt9ta •s J j\ t 914 R R � 14e-. • ♦ f (49 7 `• 149 1 .. .. .. � � a ftp f J i t N4 14. I 1 1 r 4" 149 a utq / i J j i arta 149 s 1 t I 199.. s a wlt4 ff•a � � � � � r r/4 J j \ e ts(a4 f"NM • 1 t I t7af Mow a .041 ■ a wltt• ! f • a is/tp • • f a afta R a at>M S ! ! « tu(aa M110111 r t9(a9 i E S « wuta J i wltt• J! r alp J i( r nl.a J i<< Nr J l 9. e alta (M a 1 t ! 14 •+ \ t r 1a4rit t I 14. 1 t I ON- . • t r • ai .. t9aw -. • 19aw • MIS" •. R R ! (X44f .t i � � 19W f f f R (rigor \ C Itari IWa -9 14.'9 149w Traffic and Parking Study Figure 10 Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2030 NO BUILD City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes p Feet } 0 250 500 1,000 B [ a Mf>o s ! it N J J t r Man Aawn:. ti t r a sta •(a fwlne+ ! R r r c S e � taloa J l 4 r «(W J l 1, r x+eixw 1«e + 1 1 ! P � M IR•.+ 1 } r las-. lwa •` r �. t c Wlta nae t •. 6 r J l i r na la• s 1 1 F a SitIISM w c nae" e J l t r ssaa Ia• • S t OF to 25 + s R B R a ISIOSa ins - M .• Mina 9 9 8 J l t r Mp" Uta«S 0 1 t r (M(M -. I • [ g Ma S t` [ $ a ta(tw [ a +n(tw a mItM1 a s(a a MI MI Ms(«a o - • Msitw = sals/q [ fe mUw J 1 �. r also J l t• r aIn J l r •ta J l {. r wa t r u e+ i t Ina SID + } r t a•+ It t r aWs tsars . } r n•-. € (stash [ R [ llwm 1«a+« — : c r iwa M Inns IwM («e a Traffic and Parking Study Figure 11 Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2030 BUILD ALT 1 City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes k to Feet a 0 230 500 11000 eulua A J t r owl"IstNns + \ 1 r a st N luras Q ela. zy 1i « moo two r •- J t r nf0 J ! l r trtnN leo + 1 t r O . B Iae+ '1 t r (,Mm -� r R R INe.. � � e (n)ss r e i r of: INer ib r � — r NN • INe.. N R t wf0 i r e r ,e lN• r tss(nN J t • r muni INe+ S 1 r lulu r 0 % aNna tale r — r was ! R R J 1 � r m1eN teNtn + 1 f Ilan r R � 8 1( t IrAta r — i{ % tr(tsA a tnpw �. Na g R NI1N i( r4t0 R II E r i R t e E act's� e R «. 51F � a` •-31 � � « erfro y � 8 � W04% J t t r Otim J l r 4140 J t L r n(0 J t k r e(N J l L r at0 f0« + t r Iwo" + t r (10re + i r toe + t r Uztstr + t r mill -• � ¢ • Ilulrs r — (IAn r '" ISNW r — INe ♦ _ _ _ OWN Y Traffic and Parking Study Figure 12 e Southdale Residential Project PM (SAT) 2030 BUILD ALT 2 City of Edina Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes At York Ave & 66th St 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Ave i 66th St 02:30 PM 44 135 19 0 198 10 84 72 02.45 PM 43 119 18 0 180 14 127 89 Total 87 254 37 0 3781 24 211 161 03:00 PM 40 109 19 0 168 25 127 91 03:15 PM 46 84 18 0 148 19 159 69 03:30 PM 29 109 19 0 157 14 160 79 03:45 PM 33 114 17 0 164 19 164 1 Total 148 416 73 0 637 77 610 349 04:00 PM 30 110 22 0 162 15 150 92 04:15 PM 28 112 18 0 158 16 149 91 04:30 PM 24 123 17 0 164 30 176 81 04:45 PM 28 97 19 0 144 18 226 106 Total 110 442 76 0 628 79 701 370 05:00 PM 39 95 19 3 156 18 197 84 05:15 PM 26 127 23 0 176 16 224 103 05:30 PM 28 117 15 0 160 35 180 80 05:45 PM 15 115 20 0 150 28 172 108 Total 168 454 77 3 642 97 773 375 06:00 PM 26 137 10 0 1739 123 97 06:15 PM 35 103 11 0 149 14 109 79 Grand Total 514 1806 284 3 2607 300 2527 1431 Apprch % 19.7 69.3 10.9 0.1 7 59.3 33.6 Total % 3.4 11.9 1.9 0 17.2 2 16.7 9.5 0 1661 53 124 59 0 301 37 155 61 0 3961 90 279 120 0 243 63 130 60 0 247 63 130 69 0 253 63 158 65 293 79 133 T 0 1036 268 551 266 0 257 69 159 48 0 256 101 138 68 0 287 60 165 66 0 350 78 176 69 0 1150 308 638 251 0 299 84 185 60 0 343 82 180 63 0 295 69 186 59 0 308 86 154 62 0 1245 321 705 244 0 229 81 183 66 0 202 76 164 53 0 4258 1144 2520 1000 0 24.5 54 21.4 0 28.1 7.6 16.6 6.6 kl�- File Name : York Ave & 66th St Site Code : 00000011 Start Date : 7/12/2012 Page No : 1 0 236 54 58 36 0 253 50 81 34 0 4891 104 139 70 0 253 53 92 28 0 262 47 115 34 0 286 56 153 42 0 284 47 132 4 0 1085 203 492 145 0 276 66 123 36 0 307 61 153 50 0 291 61 157 29 0 323 61 202 52 0 1197 249 635 167 0 329 59 183 57 0 325 47 169 54 0 314 46 126 44 302 55 149 45 0 1270 207 627 200 0 330 41 115 39 0 293 39 104 32 0 4664 843 2112 653 0 23.4 58.5 18.1 0 30.8 5.6 14 4.3 00 313 1 748 0 1 1 1 628 0 313 1576 0 173 837 0 196 853 0 251 947 0 22 1 0 840 3598 0 225 920 0 264 985 0 247 989 0 2991 1083 0 270 1114 0 216 985 0 10341 4191 0 195 927 0 175 819 0 3608 15137 0 0 23.8 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 66th St 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's File Name : York Ave & 66th St Site Code : 00000011 Start Date : 7/12/2012 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06A a PM York Ave From Nort 66th St ro Ea s York Ave From h 66th St West St Time R' ht ThN L@ Peds Ri ht Thru Left Peds i Ri ThN Left Peds rani R ht ThN a PedsAN. torr 1nL Tool Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06A a PM - Peak 7 or -i Peak Hour for Entire intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 24 123 17 0 164 30 176 81 0 287 60 165 66 0291 61 157 29 0 247 989 04:45 PM 28 97 19 0 144 18 226 106 0 350 78 176 69 0 323 61 202 52 0 315 1132 05:00 PM 39 95 19 3 156 18 197 84 0 299 84 185 60 0 329 59 183 57 0 299 1083 05:15 PM 26 127 23 0 176 16 294- 103 0 34 82 180 63 0 7 169 54 0 270 1114 Totaivoksne 1 117 442 78 3 640 82 823 374 0 1279 304 706 258 0 1268 228 711 192 0 1131 4318 York Ave EM Right Thou Peds Peak Hour Data fm North c-, Peak Hour Beg(ns at 04:30 P Unshifted 4, T r► 581 7061 3041 0 Ow " Out In Total W- WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 66th St File Name : York Ave & 66th St -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000011 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 1 York Ave I 66th St 103() AM 16 122 23 G 1611 7 43 63 85 15 7 36 14 03 10:45 AM 1 20 175 12 0 207 0 53 79 0 132 56 11 49 0 218 23 8 19 0 100 657 Total 36 297 35 0 3681 7 96 152 0 2551 119 198 64 0 381 1 30 94 33 0 1571 1161 11:00 AM 24 121 12 0 157 1 71 58 0 130 74 130 44 0 2481 30 45 17 0 92 627 11:15 AM 23 138 17 0 178 13 66 73 0 152 66 136 43 0 2451 36 55 26 0 117 692 11:30 AM 12 150 12 0 174 3 58 79 1 141 67 125 46 0 238 39 63 24 0 126 679 11:45 AM 16 182 13 0 211 0 71 84 0 155 81 168 50 0 299 37 77 J8 0 132 797 Total 75 591 54 0 720 17 266 294 1 578 288 559 183 0 10301 142 240 85 0 467 2795 12:00 PM 26 130 13 0 169 0 82 76 0 158 94 145 59 0 298 40 77 18 0 135 760 12:15 PM 15 142 15 0 172 7 76 75 0 158 76 167 40 0 283 46 65 28 0 139 752 12:30 PM 15 150 6 0 171 6 69 88 0 163 87 145 58 0 290 49 66 26 0 141 765 12:45 PM 11 149 13 0 173 12 71 84 0 167 78 153 59 0 290 39 70 37 0 146 776 Total 67 571 47 0 685 25 298 323 0 646 335 610 216 0 1161 174 278 109 0 561 3053 01:00 PM 24 143 9 0 176 3 71 70 0 144 94 148 58 0 300 42 58 31 0 131 751 01:15 PM 15 147 10 0 172 6 78 77 1 162 79 148 47 0 274 39 87 16 0 142 750 01:30 PM 25 140 14 0 179 4 66 96 0 166 65 170 56 1 292 54 65 18 0 137 774 .01:45 PM 18 135 14 0 167 2 70 62 0 134 72 129 60 0 261 42 73 25 0 140 70 Total 82 565 47 0 694 15 285 305 1 606 310 595 221 1 1127 177 283 90 0 550 2977 02:00 PM 15 138 16 0 169 9 77 70 0 156 83 136 49 0 268 26 79 39 0 144 737 02:15 PM 20 137 22 0 179 15 75 92 0 182 55 156 55 0 266 39 69 36 0 144 771 Grand Total 295 2299 221 0 2815 88 1097 1236 2 2423 1190 2254 788 1 4233 588 1043 392 0 2023 11494 Apprch % 1 10.5 81.7 7.9 0 3.6 45.3 51 0.1 28.1 53.2 18.6 0 29.1 51.6 19.4 0 Total % 2.6 20 1.9 0 24.5 0.8 9.5 10.8 0 21.1 10.4 19.6 6.9 0 36.8 5.1 9.1 3.4 0 17.6 0 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 66th St 10:30-2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy File Name : York Ave & 66th St -sat Site Code : 00000011 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No :2 EM Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A shid T r tlaawt In TotOut al 0"� WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 File Name : York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 2:30-6:30 pm Site Code : 00000008 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/11/2012 90's Page No : 1 York Ave i Entrance i York Ave i Southdale Ent 02:30 PM 0 93 28 1 122 39 0 320 71 10 233 0 0 243 15 0 27 0 42 478 02.45 PM 0 177 37 0 214 21 0 35 0 56 6 221 0 0 227 31 10 20 0 61 558 Total 0 270 65 1 3361 60 0 67 0 1271 16 454 0 0 4701 46 10 47 0 1031 1036 03:00 PM 0 156 27 0 183 41 0 30 0 71 5 223 0 0 228 23 8 20 0 51 533 03:15 PM 0 185 39 0 224 40 0 23 0 63 16 213 0 0 229 28 6 25 0 59 575 03:30 PM 0 163 26 0 189 42 0 37 0 79 15 210 0 0 225 16 11 27 4 58 551 03:45 PM 0 179 41 0 220 32 0 32 0 64 16 238 0 0 254 18 3 25 0 46 584 Total 0 683 133 0 816 155 0 122 0 277 52 884 0 0 936 85 28 97 4 214 2243 04:00 PM 0 138 37 0 175 36 0 25 0 61 15 229 0 0 244 32 7 37 0 76 556 04:15 PM 0 175 38 0 213 33 0 34 0 67 14 246 0 0 260 18 4 27 0 49 589 04:30 PM 0 172 35 0 207 33 0 39 0 72 9 243 0 0 252 15 5 23 1 44 575 04:45 PM 0 185 39 0 224 29 0 33 0 62 17 282 0 0 299 17 2 29 2 50 63 Total 0 670 149 0 819 131 0 131 0 262 55 1000 0 0 1055 82 18 116 3 219 2355 05:00 PM 0 164 33 0 197 40 0 36 0 76 12 234 0 0 246 15 5 26 3 49 568 05:15 PM 0 155 39 0 194 44 0 27 0 71 15 291 0 0 306 29 5 34 0 68 639 05:30 PM 0 161 41 0 202 43 0 29 0 72 17 201 0 0 218 30 5 28 2 65 557 05:45 PM 0 182 49 0 231 47 0 44 0 91 15 260 0 0 275 10 7 17 2 36 633 Total 0 662 162 0 824 174 0 136 0 310 59 986 0 0 10451 84 22 105 7 218 2397 06:00 PM 0 140 20 0 160 44 0 33 0 7715 214 0 0 229 21 4 34 1 60 526 06:15 PM 0 167 33 0 200 31 0 32 0 63 8 213 0 0 221 16 4 15 0 35 519 Grand Total 0 2592 562 1 3155 595 0 521 0 1116 205 3751 0 0 3956 334 86 414 15 849 9076 Apprch % 0 82.2 17.8 0 53.3 0 46.7 0 5.2 94.8 0 0 39.3 10.1 48.8 1.8 Total % 0 28.6 6.2 0 34.8 6.6 0 5.7 0 12.3 2.3 41.3 0 0 43.6 3.7 0.9 4.6 0.2 9.4 M WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 File Name : York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 2:30-6:30 pm Site Code : 00000008 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/11/2012 90's Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 York Ave From N rth Entrance om a York Ave om Sou Southdale Ent From We Start T RI ht ThN eft Peds n R t Thru Left Peds r R ht Thru Le Peds tom R' ht ThN Left Peds t«. Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 0 172 35 0 207 33 0 39 0 72 9 243 0 0 252 15 5 23 1 44 575 04:45 PM 0 185 39 0 224 29 0 33 0 62 17 282 0 0 299 17 2 29 2 50 635 05:00 PM 0 164 33 0 197 40 0 36 0 76 12 234 0 0 246 15 5 26 3 49 568 05:15 PM 0 155 39 0 194 44 0 27 0 71 15 291 0 0 306 29 5 34 0 68 639 Totalvokime 0 676 146 0 822 146 0 135 0 281 53 1050 0 0 1103 76 17 112 6 211 2417 AL e.,. Tnt.1 n A22 17.8 0 52 0 48 0 4.8 95.2 0 0 36 8.1 53.1 2.8 York Ave Ave rEO Total r Right Thru Lpft Pods Peak Hour Data � � North w � Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P G Unshittedr R T r ds E: 01 10501 531 -T-Qj Out In Total kq A WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Default Comments Change These in The Preferences Window Select File/Preference in the Main Scree Then Click the Comments Tab File Name : York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 -sat Site Code : 00000008 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 Ftijrt 1 Right I Thru I Laic Peds r ea m m v moo.. . --_ _ 10:30 AM 0 160 28 0 188 29 0 21 0 50 t 148 0 0 157 12 1M45 AM 0 4 49 0 233 5 0 17 0 42 11 179 0 19 17 7 27 1 516 Total 0 344 77 0 421 1 54 0 38 0 921 20 327 0 0 3471 29 11 33 1 741 934 11:00 AM 0 161 32 0 193 33 0 33 0 66 13 182 0 0 195 12 1 5 0 18 472 11:15 AM 91 86 34 0 141 36 68 6 0 110 10 139 2 0 143 24 5 10 0 39 4485 33 11:30 AM 9 758 39 0 198 37 0 23 0 60 18 165 0 0 183 19 5 20 0 44 626 11: AM 0 213 7 0 50 49 0 3 0 78 16 222 0 2 40 2 1 Total 12 628 142 0 782 155 2 0 759 95 13 52 0 1 68 92 0 315 57 700 60 2016 12:00 PM 0 144 33 0 177 46 0 40 0 86 3 219 0 0 222 28 5 27 0 60 545 12:15 PM 0 166 41 0 207 37 0 37 0 74 11 223 1 0 235 31 1 19 0 51 567 12:30 PM 0 160 38 0 198 46 0 33 0 79 9 211 0 0 220 17 6 22 0 45 542 12:45 PM 1 2 30 2 2 3 0 30 0 63 17 227 0 0 24 0 4 2 0 46 5 Total 0 642 142 0 784 162 0 140 0 302 40 880 1 0 921 96 16 90 0 202 2209 01:00 PM 3 132 44 0 179 41 41 32 0 114 12 175 0 0 187 33 3 24 0 60 540 01:15 PM 0 178 29 0 207 38 0 40 0 78 15 226 1 0 242 26 3 26 0 55 582 01:30 PM 0 150 50 0 200 29 0 35 0 64 12 208 0 0 220 24 3 225 374 0 60 544 0 62 555 01:4 P 145 5 195 36 1 73 14 211 0 Total 3 605 173 0 781 144 43 141 1 329 53 820 1 0 874 108 18 111 0 237 2?21 02:00 PM 5 161 52 0 218 35 0 31 0 66 15 195 0 0 210 33 3 25 0 69 555 02:15 PM 0 180 41 0 221 58 0 37 0 95 13 215 0 0 228 25 5 18 0 48 592 Grand Total 20 2560 627 0 3207 608 111 479 1 1199 198 3137 4 0 3339 386 66 329 1 782 8527 Apprch % 0.6 79.8 19.6 0 50.7 8.3 39.9 0.1 5.9 94 0.1 0 44.4 8.4 42.1 0.1 0 0 39.2 4 Total % 0.2 30 7.4 0 37.6 7.1 1.3 5.6 0 14.1 2.3 36.8 .5 0.8 3.9 0 8.2 Poo WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Default Comments Change These in The Preferences Window Select File/Preference in the Main Scree Then Click the Comments Tab File Name : York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 8 -sat Site Code : 00000008 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 2 Peak dour Analysis From iu:3u AM to u1:15 PM - Peak 1 Of 1 Peak Hour for From Nqrth F t h rom We t Start Tim ht Thru Left Peds .T Right Thru eft Peds Tem Right I Thtu I Le Peds R ht ThruI Left Peds IT.a Peak dour Analysis From iu:3u AM to u1:15 PM - Peak 1 Of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 0 213 37 0 250 49 0 30 0 79 16 222 0 0 238 40 2 17 0 59 626 12:00 PM 0 144 33 0 177 46 0 40 0 86 3 219 0 0 222 28 5 27 0 60 545 12:15 PM 0 166 41 0 207 37 0 37 0 74 11 223 1 0 235 31 1 19 0 51 567 12:30 PM 0 160 38 0 198 46 0 33 0 79 9 211 0 0 220 17 6 22 0 45 542 Total volume 0 683 149 0 832 178 0 140 0 318 39 875 1 0 915 116 14 85 0 215 2280 % App. TOW 0 82.1 17.9 0 56 0 44 0 4.3 95.6 0.1 0 4 6.5 39.5 0 000 .832 908 .000 .875 .000 .924 1 .609 .98 .000 .583 .787 .911 1 11381 1 19701 Witt Tru Left Peds Peak Hour Data Norih Lr Peak flour Begins at 11:45 Linshitted a 4 T F+ 1 11 8751 391 ol Out In Total WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 9 File Name : York Ave & southdale ent-site 9 2:30-6:30 Site Code : 00000009 Edina MN Start Date : 7/12/2012 90's Page No : 1 Entrance I York Ave 02:30 PM 1 29 212 0 1 2,421 1 0 01 2 0 250 11 0 261 0 0 0 0 0 509 02.45 PM 33 217 0 1 251 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 9 0 234 0 0 0 0 0 489 Total 1 62 429 0 2 4931 1 0 0 1 21 0 475 20 0 4951 0 0 0 0 01 99C 03:00 PM 35 203 0 1 239 0 0 0 1 1 5 232 15 1 253 0 0 0 1 1 494 03:15 PM 19 173 0 5 197 1 0 0 1 2 1 264 11 0 276 0 0 0 1 1 476 03:30 PM 32 198 0 0 230 1 0 0 4 5 0 281 12 0 293 0 0 0 3 3 531 03:45 7 238 0 0 265 0 0 0 4 4 0 280 15 0 295 0 0 0 Total 113 812 0 6 931 2 0 0 10 12 6 1057 53 1 1117 0 0 0 5 5 2065 04:00 PM 35 217 0 2 254 1 0 0 6 7 0 286 14 0 300 00 0 0 0 561 04:15 PM 37 207 0 1 245 3 0 0 4 7 1 309 18 0 328 0 0 0 2 2 582 04:30 PM 24 224 0 1 249 1 0 0 6 7 1 297 9 1 308 0 0 0 0 0 564 04:45 PM 39 210 0 2 251 1 0 0 2 3 1 317 16 1 335 0 0 0 0 0 589 Total 135 858 0 6 999 6 0 0 18 24 3 1209 57 2 1271 1 0 0 0 2 2 2296 05:00 PM 31 208 0 1 240 1 0 0 1 2 0 326 21 2 349 00 0 0 0 591 05:15 PM 28 223 0 1 252 1 0 0 3 4 0 307 19 1 327 0 0 0 0 0 583 05:30 PM 27 199 0 0 226 2 0 0 7 9 1 312 17 3 333 0 0 0 1 1 569 05:45 PM 30 221 0 1 252 1 0 0 9 10 0 293 14 1 308 0 0 0 1 1 571 Total 116 851 0 3 970 5 0 0 20 25 1 1238 71 7 13171 0 0 0 2 2 2314 06:00 PM 32 215 0 0 247 1 0 0 2 3 0 305 6 0 311 0 0 0 0 0 561 06:15 PM 28 174 0 0 202 0 0 0 3 3 0 259 20 1 280 0 0 0 2 2 487 Grand Total 486 3339 0 17 3842 15 0 0 54 69 10 4543 227 11 4791 0 0 0 11 11 8713 Apprch % 12.6 86.9 0 0.4 21.7 0 0 78.3 0.2 94.8 4.7 0.2 0 0 0 100 Total % 5.6 38.3 0 0.2 44.1 0.2 0 0 0.6 0.8 0.1 52.1 2.6 0.1 55 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 41 001 York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 9 2:30-6:30 Edina MN 90's York WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : York Ave & southdale ent-site 9 Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 7/12/2012 Page No :2 Ave Ent Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 1 335 0 0 0 0 0 589 04:45 PM 39 210 0 2 251 1 0 0 2 1 3 2 1 0 317 326 18 21 2 349 0 0 0 0 0 591 05:00 PM 31 208 0 1 240 1 0 0 0 3 4 0 307 19 1 327 0 0 569 0 0 0 583 05:15 PM 28 223 0 1 282 1 0 7 312 17 3 :30 M 0 26 0 4 969 2 5 0 0 13 18 2 1262 73 7 1344 0 0 0 1 1 2332 Total volume _ .. 125 840 .-- -- -, n n . 97R 0 0 72.2 0.1 93.9 6.4 0.5 0 0 --o 100 --- York Ave E2236 Rl WT Lel Peds Peak Hour Data � Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 T r Out In Total 6Ib) WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 9 File Name : York Ave & southdale ent-site 9 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000009 Edina MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 1 York Ave i Entrance i York Ave i Southdale Ent 10:30 AMI 32 1710 1 2041 1 0 0 1 21 0 171 12 0 1831 0 0 00 0 01 389 10:45 AM 41 236 0 1 278 0 0 0 0 0 2 213 18 0 233 0 0 0 0 511 Total 73 407 0 2 4821 1 0 0 1 21 2 384 30 0 4161 0 0 0 0 01 900 11:00 AM 39 172 0 1 212 1 0 0 1 2 4 197 23 1 225 0 0 0 0 0 439 11:15 AM 42 205 0 3 250 1 0 0 1 2 1 151 26 0 178 0 0 0 0 0 430 11:30 AM 39 229 0 0 268 1 0 0 2 3 0 194 28 1 223 0 0 0 1 1 495 11.45 AM 36 2680 0 304 0 0 0 2 2 1 256 32 1 2901 0 a 0 0 0 596 Total 156 874 0 4 1034 3 0 0 6 9 6 798 109 3 916 0 0 0 1 1 1960 12:00 PM 41 208 0 2 251 1 0 0 2 3 1 251 41 1 294 0 0 0 0 0 548 12:15 PM 35 225 0 2 262 2 0 0 1 3 2 256 23 0 281 0 0 0 2 2 548 12:30 PM 29 259 0 0 288 1 0 0 2 3 1 256 23 1 281 0 0 0 0 0 572 12:45 PM 46 232 0 2 280 4 0 0 2 6 1 258 24 1 284 0 0 0 0 0 570 Total 151 924 0 6 1081 8 0 0 7 15 5 1021 111 3 1140 0 0 0 2 2 2238 01:00 PM 42 215 0 1 258 1 0 0 1 2 2 222 18 2 244 0 0 0 2 2 506 01:15 PM 35 236 0 1 272 1 0 0 2 3 0 261 29 1 291 0 0 0 0 0 566 01:30 PM 32 250 0 2 284 2 0 0 4 6 1 229 35 2 267 0 0 0 1 1 558 01:45 PM 39 203 0 0 242 1 0 0 2 3 2 239 42 84 0 0 1 1 530 Total 148 904 0 4 1056 5 0 0 9 14 5 951 124 6 1086 0 0 0 4 4 2160 02:00 PM 31 200 0 0 2311 0 0 1 2 1 224 31 0 256 0 0 0 0 0 489 02:15 PM 42 226 0 0 268 0 0 0 2 2 0 262 29 1 292 0 0 0 1 1 563 Grand Total 601 3535 0 16 4152 18 0 0 26 44 19 3640 434 13 4106 0 0 0 8 8 8310 Apprch % 14.5 85.1 0 0.4 40.9 0 0 59.1 0.5 88.7 10.6 0.3 0 0 0 100 Total % 7.2 42.5 0 0.2 50 0.2 0 0 0.3 0.5 0.2 43.8 5.2 0.2 49.4 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & Southdale Ent -site 9 File Name : York Ave & southdale ent-site 9 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000009 Edina MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis I-rOM 1 U:3U AM 1O UZ:10 t -M - t-eaK 1 OT 7 York Ave Froin Nqrth Entrance Erorn East York Ave o th Southdale Ent a TimeRight Thru Left Peas T Right Thru Left Peds .T w Right Thru L@ft Peda Tom Fright ThN Left Peds T Peak Hour Analysis I-rOM 1 U:3U AM 1O UZ:10 t -M - t-eaK 1 OT 7 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 36 268 0 0 304 0 0 0 2 2 1 256 32 1 290 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 41 208 0 2 251 1 0 0 2 3 1 251 41 1 294 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 35 225 0 2 262 2 0 0 1 3 2 256 23 0 281 0 0 0 2 12:30 P 29 25 0 0 88 1 0 0 2 3 1 256 3 1 281 0 0 0 Total volume 141 960 0 4 1105 4 0 0 7 11 5 1019 119 3 1146 0 0 0 2 York Ave To� I ztza� goo 1 01 41 Right Th L� Peds Peak Hour Data � 1 North V—g , 4—� Peak Hour Begins al 11:45 5 r s N� n � i Unshftd a � +, T r Thrmu 1 1191 10191 51 Out In Total Am- ant ML T 0 596 0 548 2 548 0 572 21 2264 York Ave & 69th St 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's 02:30 PM 1 42 178 9 02:45 PM 1 34 157 6 Total 1 76 335 15 03:00 PM 43 171 11 03:15 PM 37 178 4 03:30 PM 39 185 9 03:45 PM 37 188 8 Total 156 722 32 04:00 PM 31 183 6 04:15 PM 34 191 3 04:30 PM 26 171 16 04:45 PM 45 187 11 Total 136 732-3 6 05:00 PM 34 169 11 05:15 PM 43 200 it 05:30 PM 39 149 9 .05:45 PM 46 169 7 Total 162 687 38 00 PM 44 156 13 V0PM 45 155 7 Grand Total 619 2787 141 Apprch % 17.5 78.6 4 Total % 6.2 27.9 1.4 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St 0 229 6 11 10 0 197 15 12 7 0 4261 21 23 17 0 225 9 16 13 0 219 13 13 8 0 233 22 6 17 0 233 10 17 11 0 910 54 52 49 0 220 13 17 17 0 228 13 26 10 0 213 9 21 10 0 243 11 16 6 0 904 46 80 43 0 214 10 23 14 0 254 8 27 12 0 197 10 26 14 222 13 33 13 0 887 41 109 53 0 21320 7 16 17 0 207 16 8 9 0 3547 198 288 188 0 29.4 42.7 27.9 0 35.5 2 2.9 1.9 0 27 5 183 24 0 34 6 203 24 0 61 1 11 386 48 0 38 5 217 35 0 34 7 198 12 0 45 7 194 28 0 38 11 254 20 0 155 30 863 95 0 47 4 197 26 0 49 8 230 35 0 40 7 213 52 0 33 8 221 37 0 169 27 861 150 0 47 12 259 45 0 47 10 267 31 0 50 6 210 39 0 59 10 239 29 0 203 38 975 144 053 7 220 41 0 33 6 179 22 0 674 119 3484 500 0 2.9 84.9 12.2 0 6.8 1.2 34.9 5 AIN File Name : York Ave & 69th St Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 1 0 212 41 13 57 0 1111 579 0 233 44 13 43 0 1001 564 0 44-51 85 26 100 0 211 1 1143 0 257 34 13 46 0 93 613 0 217 39 13 40 0 92 562 0 229 26 23 42 0 91 598 0 285 38 24 4Q 0 102 658- 80 0 988 137 73 168 0 378 2431 0 227 34 28 35 0 97 591 0 273 41 33 39 0 113 663 0 272 47 32 45 0 124 649 266 32 35 39 0 106 648 0 1038 154 128 158 0 440 2551 0 316 37 53 48 0 138 715 0 308 30 29 42 1 102 711 0 255 33 29 54 0 116 618 278 29 14 34 0 77 636 0 1157 129 125 178 1 433 2680 0 26832 26 45 0 103 637 0 207 38 17 35 0 90 537 0 4103 575 395 684 1 1655 9979 0 34.7 23.9 41.3 0.1 0 41.1 5.8 4 6.9 0 16.6 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 69th St 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's File Name : York Ave & 69th St Site Code :00000005 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No :2 hK T-1 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 I'M - F OaK 1 of 1 Epp Nqrth 69th St Erm East Fr 69th St om e t StartT R Thru Left Pada . r R ht ru Left Peds Tmr R ht Thru Left Peds Tow R Thru Left Peds hK T-1 Peak Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 I'M - F OaK 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 26 171 16 0 213 9 21 10 0 40 7 213 52 0 272 47 32 45 0 124 649 04:45 PM 45 187 11 0 243 11 16 6 0 33 8 221 37 0 266 32 35 39 0 106 648 05:00 PM 34 169 11 0 214 10 23 14 0 47 12 259 45 0 316 37 63 48 0 138 715 05:15 PM 43 200 11 0 254 8 27 12 0 47 10 267 31 0 = 30 29 42 1 102 LU Tow voksne 148 727 49 0 924 38 87 42 0 167 37 960 165 0 11621 146 149 174 1 470 2723 CNin Total I— R241 120961 491 0 Rlolrt T� L4rt Pads Peak Hour Data s T North J Unshifted Peak Flour Begins at 04:30 P � r 4, T FF 1 651 Out In Total �t07 York Ave & 69th St 10:30-2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Ave I 69th 10 30 AM 49 138 8 0 195i 15 20 10 10-46 AM 35 183 7 0 2251 12 12 15 Total 1 84 321 15 0 4201 27 32 25 11:00 AM 41 160 10 0 211 16 18 13 11:15 AM 43 156 3 0 202 15 11 14 11:30 AM 42 156 5 0 203 13 18 15 11:45 AM 44 231 10 0 285-A 8 1§ 1 Total 170 703 28 0 901 52 65 56 12:00 PM 50 154 6 0 210 22 14 18 12:15 PM 59 187 10 0 256 15 10 8 12:30 PM 44 161 7 0 212 17 21 13 12:45 P 42 179 9 0 230 20 15 7 Total 195 681 32 0 908 74 60 46 01:00 PM 51 146 8 0 205 17 15 12 01:15 PM 54 200 6 0 260 14 18 20 01:30 PM 56 162 6 0 224 21 19 12 01.45 PM 53 170 4 0 227 9 195 2 Total 214 678 24 0 916 61 63 49 02:00 PM 48 168 6 0 222 6 16 14 02:15 PM 54 196 8 0 258 15 9 18 Grand Total 765 2747 113 0 3625 235 245 208 Appreh % 21.1 75.8 3.1 0 37 34.2 35.6 30.2 Total % 7.6 27.4 1.1 0 36.2 2.3 2.4 2.1 File Name York Ave & 69th St -sat Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 1 Ave I 69th St 0 45 6 148 20 0 174 19 8 34 0 81 1 475 0 39 § 179 33 0 220 26 14 37 0 77 561 0 84 14 327 53 0 394 45 22 71 0 138 1036 0 47 9 199 29 0 237 26 13 41 0 80 575 0 40 8 197 28 0 233 27 21 40 0 88 563 0 46 8 189 42 0 239 30 13 40 0 83 571 0 40 1 244 35 0 2_80 55 16 44 0 0 173 26 829 134 0 989 138 63 165 0 366 2429 0 54 11 228 47 0 286 42 20 47 2 111 661 0 33 7 254 21 0 282 47 17 41 0 105 676 0 51 5 204 33 0 242 43 23 54 0 120 625 0 42 4 21 0 260 31 14 53 8 630 0 180 27 921 122 0 1070 163 74 195 2 434 2592 0 44 5 212 31 0 248 42 21 56 0 119 616 0 52 6 236 34 0 276 45 18 45 0 108 696 0 52 7 203 44 0 254 37 21 63 0 121 651 0 25 3 233 37 0 273.. 38 15 36 0 89 614 0 173 21 884 146 0 1051 162 75 200 0 437 2577 0 36 6 224 38 0 268 43 13 49 0 105 631 0 42 5 261 53 0 319 41 27 58 3 129 748 0 688 99 3446 546 0 4091 592 274 738 5 1609 10013 0 2.4 84.2 13.3 0 36.8 17 45.9 0.3 0 6.9 1 34.4 5.5 0 40.9 5.9 2.7 7.4 0 16.1 W i WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN York Ave & 69th St 10:30-2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy File Name : York Ave & 69th St -sat Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for York Ave From.Nqrth 69th St From East York Ave69th From S St ftst I Start Time R t Thru Left Peds . em R ht Thru Left Peds i Right Th Left Padsr Right I Thru I Left I Peds Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for trmre Irttersedion Begins at 11:45 Ann 11:45 AM 44 231 10 0 285 8 18 14 0 40 1 244 35 0 280 55 16 44 0 115 720 12:00 PM 50 154 6 0 210 22 14 18 0 54 11 228 47 0 286 42 20 47 2 111 661 12:15 PM 59 187 10 0 256 15 10 8 0 33 7 254 21 0 282 47 17 41 0 105 676 12:30 PM 44 161 7 0 212 17 21 13 0 51 5 204 33 0 242 43 23 54 0 120 62 Totatvokane 197 733 33 0 963 62 63 53 0 178 24 930 136 0 1090 187 76 186 2 451 2682 % App. Total 20.5 76.1 3.4 0 34.8 35.4 29.8 0 2.2 85.3 12.5 0 41.5 16.9 41.2 0.4 PHF .835 193 .7 .750 .736 .000 .824 1 .545 .915 .723 .953 1 .8 .826 .861 50 .940 1 .931 outYak Ave In r T julaL 111761 121" Right Tr L� Peds Peak Hour Data 1 t Nath Li �—♦• �-2 w Peak Hour Begins at 11:45Unabifted 3 c r N r . 1 CJ— 4, T r 136 930 241 01 Out In Total A(pq WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 2:30-6:30 pm Site Code : 00000002 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/11/2012 90's Page No : 1 Southdale Ent 69th St _Entrance I - 69th St 02:30 PM 48 ....- 6 -i 13 1 - 68 10 53 12 0 75 17 1 13 0 31 14 86 5 0 105 279 02 45 PM 37 2 19 0 5R 11 57 14 0 2 15 2 11 0 28 8 92 0 2 102 270 Total 85 8 32 1 1261 21 110 26 0 1571 32 3 24 0 591 22 178 5 2 2071 549 03:00 PM 41 2 22 0 65 13 57 9 2 81 7 2 11 0 20 4 87 0 1 92 258 03:15 PM 42 4 26 0 72 9 46 14 1 70 15 3 12 1 31 6 90 1 1 98 271 03:30 PM 42 5 23 0 70 17 37 4 0 58 10 0 16 0 26 4 101 0 0 105 259 03:45 PM 36 6 19. 1 61 9 61 13 0 83 2 1 8 2 13 3 93 2 0 98 255 Total 161 16 90 1 268 48 201 40 3 292 34 6 47 3 90 17 371 3 2 393 1043 04:00 PM 38 3 39 1 81 14 49 16 0 79 8 2 6 3 19 1 109 1 0 111 290 04:15 PM 43 3 19 0 65 15 60 16 3 94 7 6 10 1 24 4 88 4 0 96 279 04:30 PM 35 2 28 0 65 18 60 12 1 91 10 0 6 3 19 10 102 0 0 112 287 4:45 PM 35 4 22 1 62 17 515 14 1 87 13 1 8 1 23 2 115 0 0 117 289 Total 151 12 108 2 273 64 224 58 5 351 38 9 30 8 85 17 414 5 0 436 1145 05:00 PM 53 1 28 0 82 9 43 4 1 57 12 0 5 2 19 4 136 0 0 140 298 05:15 PM 42 4 16 1 63 11 51 14 1 77 11 0 2 0 13 8 117 0 0 125 278 05:30 PM 43 2 17 0 62 11 56 26 0 93 10 0 6 0 16 3 124 0 0 127 298 05:45 PM 42 1 15 0 58 8 48 21 1 78 11 2 4 0 17 4 93 1 0 8 251 Total 180 8 76 1 265 39 198 65 3 305 44 2 17 2 65 19 470 1 0 490 1125 06:00 PM 47 5 19 1 72 12 39 160 67 12 2 13 1 28 6 116 0 0 122 289 06:15 PM 50 4 16 0 TO 13 46 21 0 80 6 1 9 0 16 3 97 1 0 101 2671 Grand Total 674 53 341 6 1074 197 818 226 11 1252 166 23 140 14 343 84 846 15 4 1749 4418 Apprch % 62.8 4.9 31.8 0.6 15.7 65.3 18.1 0.9 48.4 6.7 40.8 4.1 4.8 94.1 0.9 0.2 Total % 15.3 1.2 7.7 0.1 24.3 4.5 18.5 5.1 0.2 28.3 3.8 0.5 3.2 0.3 7.8 1.9 37.3 0.3 0.1 39.6 A lea WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 2:30-6:30 pm Site Code : 00000002 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/11/2012 90's Page No :2 ioeaK "Our Analysis rrom uc:au rm to uo: i a rnn - rear, 1 o, r Southdale Ent From North 69th St From East Entrance From South 69th St EP Start Time R t Thru Left Peds Right Thtu Left Peds ram Ri it Thru eft Peds ht Thru Left Pads r«x ioeaK "Our Analysis rrom uc:au rm to uo: i a rnn - rear, 1 o, r Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 35 4 22 1 62 17 55 14 1 87 13 1 8 1 23 2 115 0 0 117 289 05:00 PM 53 1 28 0 82 9 43 4 1 57 12 0 5 2 19 4 136 0 0 140 298 05:15 PM 42 4 16 1 63 11 51 14 1 77 11 0 2 0 13 8 117 0 0 125 278 30 PM 43 2 17 0 62 11 56 26 0 93 10 0 6 0 16 3 124 0 0 127 29 Total volume 173 11 83 2 269 48 205 58 3 314 46 1 21 3 71 17 492 0 0 509 1163 u, eoe TnW 64.3 4.1 30.9 0.7 15.3 65.3 18.5 1 64.8 1.4 29.6 4.2 3.3 96.7 0 0 uthdate Ent Out In T otal 1 318 1 1731 ill 831 2 Righl Thru LePeds L Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PG) i2q S s rA a +1 T r► Pads Out In Total AW WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000002 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 1 Southdale Ent I 69th St I Entrance I 69th St 10:45 AMI 19 2 8 0 29 I 10 32 15 0 57 I18 30 14 0 62 12 5 9 0 26 I 9 107 1 0 117 I 229 Total 37 4 16 0 571 28 62 29 0 1191 19 7 15 0 41 17 183 3 0 2031 420 11:00 AM 20 2 18 0 40 15 34 10 0 59 8 5 10 0 23 6 92 2 0 100 222 11:15 AM 20 2 15 0 37 16 34 19 0 69 12 2 5 0 19 8 105 2 0 115 240 11:30 AM 34 4 11 0 49 23 39 14 0 76 11 2 8 0 21 9 107 1 0 117 263 11:45 AM 52 8 1 0 91 26 37 20 0 83 17 3 9 0 29 7 124 1 0 132 33 Total 126 16 75 0 217 80 144 63 0 287 48 12 32 0 92 30 428 6 0 464 1060 12:00 PM 40 6 26 0 72 18 29 23 0 70 15 3 8 0 26 4 113 0 0 117 285 12:15 PM 39 5 24 0 68 22 42 17 0 81 17 4 17 0 38 7 129 1 0 137 324 12:30 PM 59 2 33 0 94 16 41 16 0 73 17 3 11 0 31 3 108 0 0 111 309 12-45 PM 50 10 28 0 88 14 46 13 0 73 16 1 9 0 26 10 132 0 0 142 329 Total 188 23 111 0 322 70 158 69 0 297 65 11 45 0 121 24 482 1 0 507 1247 01:00 PM 46 5 26 0 77 17 55 17 0 89 14 3 6 0 23 7 151 0 0 158 347 01:15 PM 44 4 21 0 69 30 38 28 0 96 13 0 14 0 27 8 122 2 0 132 324 01:30 PM 67 8 33 0 108 18 56 19 0 93 16 4 6 0 26 7 113 3 0 123 350 01:45 PM 53 5 18 0 76 30 43 19 0 92 13 1 13 0 27 4 129 1 0 134 32J Total 210 22 98 0 330 95 192 83 0 370 56 8 39 0 1031 26 515 6 0 547 1350 02:00 PM 50 4 28 0 82 18 44 17 0 79 13 3 8 0 24 7 94 2 0 103 288 02:15 PM 49 10 43 0 102 36 47 26 0 109 20 3 10 0 33 8 113 4 0 125 369 Grand Total 660 79 371 0 1110 327 647 287 0 1261 221 44 149 0 414 112 1815 22 0 1949 4734 Apprch % 59.5 7.1 33.4 0 25.9 51.3 22.8 0 53.4 10.6 36 0 5.7 93.1 1.1 0 Total % 13.9 1.7 7.8 0 23.4 6.9 13.7 6.1 0 26.6 4.7 0.9 3.1 0 8.7 2.4 38.3 0.5 0 41.2 kI�01� WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 2 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000002 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 2 Peak Hour Analysis From iu:3u AM io uc. 1 a rm Southdale Ent 69th St Entrance 69th St r No m t u West Start me R' ht Th ft Peds r i R ht Thr. Left Peds .r Ri ht Thru Left Peds Right Thru Le Peds In�rolal Peak Hour Analysis From iu:3u AM io uc. 1 a rm - roan 1 01 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:45 PM 26 10 132 0 0 142 329 12:45 PM 50 10 28 0 88 14 46 13 0 73 16 1 9 6 0 0 23 7 151 0 0 158 347 01:00 PM 46 5 26 0 77 17 55 17 0 89 96 14 13 3 0 14 0 27 8 122 2 0 132 324 01:15 PM 44 4 21 0 69 30 38 28 0 93 16 4 6 0 26 7 113 3 0 123 350 _AL3Q P& 67 8 33 0 108 207 27 108 0 342 18 79 66 195 12 77 0 0 351 59 8 35 0 102 32 518 5 0 555 1350 Total volume v a a4 a n 229 55.6 21.9 0 57:8 7.8 34.3 0 5.8 93.3 0.9 0 Southdale Ent T 1 4-341 1 2071 27F XM Tr lift Peds Peak Hour Data cc Peak Hour Begins a1 12:45 P y u"nshilted ;A da CHR Out In Total A 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 3 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's 02:30 PM 1 8 02:4 PM 18 Total 26 03:00 PM 7 03:15 PM 13 03:30 PM 10 03:45 PM 1 6 Total 1 36 04:00 PM 9 04:15 PM 9 04:30 PM 10 04:45 PM 8 Total 36 05:00 PM 10 05:15 PM 14 05:30 PM 7 06:00PM 10 06:15 PM 13 Grand Total 166 Apprch % 92.2 Total % 4.1 Southdale Ent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St 0 1 91 8 43 18 2 71 23 0 0 18 7 37 19 1 64 I 17 0 1 271 15 80 37 3 1351 40 0 0 7 7 45 26 2 80 12 0 0 13 3 38 21 1 63 19 0 0 10 10 40 14 1 65 18 0 6 9 48 12 1 70 22 0 0 36 29 171 73 5 278 71 0 0 9 13 49 7 1 70 19 0 0 9 15 63 11 1 90 23 0 0 10 15 53 22 1 91 25 1 9 14 55 23 2 94 19 0 1 37 57 220 63 5 345 86 0 0 10 19 58 13 1 91 20 0 0 14 7 64 16 0 87 23 0 0 7 7 64 27 2 100 22 0 0 14 13 62 1 0 96 1 0 0 45 46 248 77 3 374 80 0 11 21 15 71 16 0 102 23 0 1 14 16 40 13 0 69 24 0 14 180 178 830 279 16 1303 324 0 7.8 129 13.7 63.7 21.4 1.2 15 95.3 0 0.3 4.5 4.4 20.6 6.9 0.4 32.3 8 AA- File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 3 Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 1 Entrance 0 1 024 8 77 43 0 128 232 0 0 2 19 10 91 31 3 135 236 0 1 2 431 18 168 74 3 2631 468 0 0 0 12 12 65 37 2 116 215 0 1 0 20 10 79 37 1 127 223 0 1 0 19 17 71 29 1 118 212 0 0 1 23 7 82 38 4 131 230 0 2 1 74 46 297 141 8 492 880 0 0 1 20 14 81 33 4 132 231 0 0 0 23 12 92 35 1 140 262 0 0 0 25 13 98 50 4 165 291 0 0 1 20 24 94 44 0 162 285 0 0 2 88 63 365 162 9 599 1089 0 0 2 22 9 105 41 1 156 279 0 0 1 24 11 91 50 5 157 282 0 2 0 24 21 82 38 1 142 273 15 7 69 47 2 125 250 0 2 3 85 48 347 176 9 580 1084 0 2 1 26 12 74 40 3 129 278 0 0 0 24 15 80 49 4 148 255 0 7 9 340 202 1331 642 36 2211 4034 0 2.1 2.6 9.1 60.2 29 1.6 0 0.2 0.2 8.4 5 33 15.9 0.9 54.8 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 2:30-6:30 pm Site Code : 00000004 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/10/2012 90's Page No : 1 Southdale Ent I 69th St I I 69th St 02:30 PM 0 0 0 0 01 6 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 O I 6 02:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 0 01 13 0 0 0 131 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 13 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 :4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Total 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 06:00 PM 0 0 0 00 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 Appneh % 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 An 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's Ent From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No :2 69th St reaK pour ror mare Intersection begins at 05:0U PM 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05`.15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 05:45 PM0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Total volume 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 A. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 923 :000 .000 .000 .923 000 .000 .000 000 .000 I 000 000 000 000 OW I9 rSouthdale EntTt tUL ael I I 481 Righ ht TLeft Peds Peak Hour Data 1 North + m Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PUnshifted — S2 a +, ? r ® F--01 Out In Total An WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000004 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 1 Southdale Ent Wt I I I I 10.45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 Total 0 0 0 0 01 25 0 0 0 251 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 25 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11:15AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 Ol 0 0 0 0 0 43 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 26 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Total 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 64 01:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 01:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 01:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 01:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 37 02:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 208 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Wt WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 File Name : 69th St & Southdale Ent -site 4 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000004 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 2 Peak Flour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 011 IM ToNI Peak hour for Southdale Ent From N rth 69th St From East From South _ _ 69th St from West L Start Time I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A.0 r m I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I ,o, r m I Right I Thru I Left I Peds � r w Right Thru Left Peds Peak Flour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM - Peak 1 011 IM ToNI Peak hour for Enure Intersection Begins at T1:4o Ann 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Total volume 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 67 App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 1 .000 .00 .000 .000 .000 1 .620 .000 .000 00 .6 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .0001 620 Southdale Ent Out n , Total 67 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 A �51 m m 41 n a wo 1 r Left- Thf,1 01 0 I� Out In Total kl l � WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 69th St File Name : France Ave & 69th st 2:30-6:30 pm Site Code : 00000001 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/11/2012 90's Page No : 1 Ave 69th St France Ave I _ 69th St 02:30 PM 5 172 28 0 205 29 24 46 0 99 52 270 31 0 3531 43 39 10 02 45 PM 7 177 21 0 2n5 24 32 63 0 119 42 256 35 0 3331 49 43 12 0 104 761 Total 12 349 49 0 410 53 56 109 0 218 94 526 66 0 6861 92 82 22 1 197 1511 03:00 PM 5 181 22 0 208 28 22 47 0 97 46 257 48 0 351 51 31 8 0 90 746 03:15 PM 6 182 27 0 215 21 27 59 0 107 31 251 38 0 320 40 42 9 0 91 733 03:30 PM 8 207 26 0 241 20 26 41 0 87 43 279 42 0 364 48 43 8 1 100 792 03:45 PM 8 182 117 0 207 21 42 54 0 117 42 222 39 0 303 46 41 14 0 101 728 Total 27 752 92 0 871 90 117 201 0 408 162 1009 167 0 1338 185 157 39 1 382 2999 04:00 PM 7 180 22 0 209 15 38 36 0 89 43 293 42 0 378 38 38 11 0 87 763 04:15 PM 8 173 18 0 199 20 34 52 0 106 36 265 47 0 348 47 47 13 0 107 760 04:30 PM 12 194 29 0 235 24 43 38 0 105 49 296 37 0 382 40 47 6 1 94 816 04:45 PIVI 9 192 5 22 34 4 8 41 254 41 1 337 58 62 16 1 137 797 Total 36 739 93 0 868 81 149 168 0 398 169 1108 167 1 1445 183 194 46 2 425 3136 05:00 PM 8 175 27 0 210 19 37 39 0 95 60 318 53 0 431 46 50 8 5 109 845 05:15 PM 1 187 32 0 220 23 49 29 0 101 54 321 44 0 419 41 50 5 0 96 836 05:30 PM 4 158 31 0 193 15 33 43 0 91 63 287 42 0 392 47 46 11 0 104 780 05:45 PM 7 183 17 0 207 25 36 39 0 100 52 257 33 0 41 7 0 81 720 — Total 20 703 107 0 830 82 155 150 0 387 229 1183 172 0 1584 167 187 31 5 390 3191 06:00 PM 5 180 23 0 208 20 34 39 0 93 68 263 38 0 369 45 46 13 0 104 774 06:15 PM 4 177 28 0 207 30 30 53 0 113 52 263 38 0 353 50 44 4 0 98 771 Grand Total 104 2900 390 0 3394 356 541 720 0 1617 774 4352 648 1 5775 722 710 155 9 1596 12382 Apprch % 3.1 85.4 11.5 0 22 33.5 44.5 0 13.4 75.4 11.2 0 45.2 44.5 9.7 0.6 Total °% 0.8 23.4 3.1 0 27A 2.9 4.4 5.8 0 13.1 6.3 35.1 5.2 0 46.6 5.8 5.7 1.3 0.1 12.9 Ota 6 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 69th St 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's File Name : France Ave & 69th st Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 7/11/2012 Page No :2 Y. 10m w— r I- tV VV. I a V IVI - r"dr, 1 O1 I k1 T reaK Flour Tor -� France Ave 69th St France Ave 69th St From NorthIm East Fro o W S D—i. Lin . A Ri ht Thal Left Peds T..,Ri vn I� e...... ne.nn AAA, ht Thril Left Peds Tom Ri ht Thru Left Peds Ri ht Thru Left Peds Y. 10m w— r I- tV VV. I a V IVI - r"dr, 1 O1 I k1 T reaK Flour Tor -� tnure Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 12 194 29 0 235 24 43 38 0 105 49 296 37 0 382 40 47 6 1 94 816 04:45 PM 9 192 24 0 225 22 34 42 0 98 41 254 41 1 337 58 62 16 1 137 797 05:00 PM 8 175 27 0 210 19 37 39 0 95 60 318 63 0 431 46 50 8 5 109 845 05:15 PM 1 187 32 0 220 23 49 29 0 101 54 321 44 0 41 0 5 0 96 836 Total Volume 30 748 112 0 890 88 163 148 0 399 204 1189 175 1 1569 185 209 35 7 436 3294 % App. Total 3.4 84 12.6 0 22.1 40.9 37.1 0 13 75.8 11.2 0.1 42.4 47.9 8 1.6 F .875 .000 .947 1 .917 .832 .881 .000 .950 .850 926 825 50 .910 .797 .8 .350 .7 France _Ave � Total1 EO I l i a 81 1121 0 Riyhl Thru L@ft Peds Peak Hour Data T to North—� LF z 2 cw4 Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 P — 9 Unshiftedr 0. 41 T r 204 1 rllil DO Out In Total AQ WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 69th St File Name : France Ave & 69th st-sat 10:30-6:30 Site Code : 00000001 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 1 10:30 AM 0101 0 156 25 10.45 A 20 95 35 Total 20 196 60 11:00 AM 0 137 24 11:15 AM 3 123 30 11:30 AM 8 151 34 11:45 AM 4 157 35 Total 15 568 123 12:00 PM 3 154 28 12:15 PM 4 126 37 12:30 PM 2 161 28 12:45 13 150 37 Total 22 591 130 01:00 PM 16 123 29 01:15 PM 12 154 49 01:30 PM 8 138 27 01:45 PM 7 146 33 Total 43 561 138 02:00 PM 4 135 40 02:15 PM 7 148 32 Grand Total 111 2199 523 Apprch % 3.9 77.6 18.5 Total % 1 19.3 4.6 0 161 17 18 30 0 156 18 20 26 0 193 21 22 37 0 196 25 14 56 0 706 81 74 149 0 18524 26 42 0 167 24 21 44 0 191 45 25 46 0 200 24 29 45 0 7431 117 101 177 0 168 35 37 40 0 215 36 25 33 0 173 45 35 51 186 35 13 53 0 742 151 110 177 0 179 37 25 55 0 187 33 11 43 0 2833 448 350 654 0 30.9 24.1 45 0 24.8 3.9 3.1 5.7 0 65 48 232 19 0 64 63 232 34 0 80 52 286 34 0 95 61 283 29 0 3041 224 1033 116 0 92 63 284 17 0 89 52 294 31 0 116 51 262 28 8 90 350 22 0 395 256 1190 98 0 112 106 279 22 0 94 61 326 25 0 131 55 251 16 0 101 60 348 38 0 438 282 1204 101 0 117 47 238 21 0 87 44 257 34 0 1452 959 4357 415 0 16.7 76 7.2 0 12.7 8.4 38.2 3.6 Akan 0 299 37 37 12 0 86 611 0 329 42 30 6 0 78 627 0 372 27 58 15 1 101 746 373 54 49 15 0 118782 803 0 1373 160 174 48 1 383 2766 0 364 28 32 12 0 72 713 0 377 35 61 6 0 102 735 0 341 24 29 10 0 63 711 462 38 45 6 0 89 849 0 1544 125 167 34 0 326 3008 0 407 43 47 8 0 98 785 0 412 50 31 9 0 90 811 0 322 20 51 10 3 84 710 0 446 29 36 0 70 803 0 1587 142 165 32 3 342 3109 0 306 37 34 100 81 683 0 335 31 28 7 0 66 675 0 5731 588 656 146 4 1394 11410 0 42.2 47.1 10.5 0.3 0 50.2 5.2 5.7 1.3 0 12.2 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN France Ave & 69th St 10:30-6:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy File Name : France Ave & 69th st-sat Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 2 Int Total roan nvul nnaiyam resin rv.ov France Ave From NorthFrom 69th St East France Ave From So_ uth 69th St From West Start Time Right Thru Left Ped: .TUW Right Thru Left Peds .Tom Right I Thru I Left I Peds I Ri ht Thru I Left I Peds TOW Int Total roan nvul nnaiyam resin rv.ov rvw to vc. r u rnr - roar, to[ r Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 12:30 PM 12:30 PM 2 161 28 0 191 45 25 46 0 116 51 262 28 0 341 24 29 10 0 63 711 12:45 PM 13 150 37 0 200 24 29 45 0 98 90 350 22 0 462 38 45 6 0 89 849 01:00 PM 16 123 29 0 168 35 37 40 0 112 106 279 22 0 407 43 47 8 0 98 785 01:15 PM 12 154 49 0 215 36 25 33 0 94 61 326 25 0 412 50 11 Total Volume 43 588 143 0 774 140 116 164 0 420 306 1217 97 0 1622 155 152 33 0 340 3156 % App. Total 5.6 76 18.5 0 33.3 27.6 39 0 19 75 6 0 45.6 44.7 9.7 0 � �LL France Ave, Tom. 173901In 1 21641 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data ms r J North c 4-2 ' m Peak Hour Begins at 12:30 P ra3 r, o � o 41 T r I'fL Thru laht P-1- 1 971 12171 3081 F-9-0-71 EY50 Out In Total Ala` WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 6 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 6 2:30-6:30 Site Code : 00000006 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/10/2012 90's Page No : 1 Ent I Southdale Ent I Southdale Ent 02:30 PM 0 0 0 0 01 4 13 0 0 171 0 0 7 0 71 4 0 0 0 41 28 02.45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 35 0 0 46 0 0 15 0 15 16 0 0 0 16 77 Total 0 0 0 0 01 15 48 0 0 631 0 0 22 0 221 20 0 0 0 201 105 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 19 17 0 0 36 0 0 17 0 17 7 0 0 0 7 60 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 27 0 0 38 0 0 36 0 36 16 0 0 0 16 90 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 20 0 0 33 0 0 33 0 33 9 0 0 0 9 75 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 25 0 0 41 0 0 36 0 36 7 0 0 0 7 84 Total 0 0 0 0 0 59 89 0 0 148 0 0 122 0 1221 39 0 0 0 39 309 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 0 0 38 0 0 38 0 38 6 0 0 0 6 82 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 33 0 0 48 0 0 40 0 40 12 0 0 0 12 100 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 31 0 0 39 0 0 52 0 52 9 0 0 0 9 100 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 28 0 0 43 0 0 57 0 57 8 0 0 0 8 108 Total 0 0 0 0 0 50 118 0 0 168 0 0 187 0 1871 35 0 0 0 35 390 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 41 0 0 57 0 0 52 0 52 9 0 0 0 9 118 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 16 32 0 0 48 0 0 61 0 61 13 0 0 0 13 122 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 46 . 0 0 59 0 0 46 0 46 9 0 0 0 9 114 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 3L 0 0 57 0 0 48 0 48 10 0 0 0 10 11A Total 0 0 0 0 0 65 156 0 0 221 0 0 207 0 2071 41 0 0 0 41 469 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 23 0 0 43 0 0 59 0 59 15 0 0 0 15 117 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 53 0 0 65 0 0 53 0 53 12 0 0 0 12 130 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 221 487 0 0 708 0 0 650 0 650 162 0 0 0 162 1520 Apprcht % 0 0 0 0 31.2 68.8 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 14.5 32 0 0 46.6 0 0 42.8 0 42.8 10.7 0 0 0 10.7 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 6 2:30-6:30 Edina, MN 90's Ent Hour Analysis From 02:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 6 Site Code : 00000006 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No :2 Southdale Ent i Southdale Ent react Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:30 PM 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 46 0 0 59 0 0 46 0 46 9 0 0 0 9 114 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 37 0 0 57 0 0 48 0 48 10 0 0 0 10 115 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 20 23 0 0 43 0 0 59 0 59 15 0 0 0 15 117 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 53 0 0 65 0 0 53 0 53 12 0 0 0 12 130 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 65 159 0 0 224 0 0 206 0 206 46 0 0 0 46 476 % App.Total 0 0 0 0 29 71 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 PHF 1 .000 .000 .000 .000 .813 .750 .862 .000 .000 .873 .767 .000 .000 .000 767 .915 OAC- outhdale n'tTt 1 651 L agl Right Th L¢ft Peds Peak Hour Data 1 Noah, pL"a c Peak Hour Begins at 05:30 P a A 17A Class I 4,? r 1,95, That - Out In Total Awa' WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 6 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 6 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000006 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 1 Southdale Ent I Southdale Ent I Southdale Ent I Southdale Ent 10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 18 27 0 0 45 0 0 46 0 46 5 00 0 51 96 10.45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 16 23 0 0 39 0 0 71 0 71 3 0 0 0 3 113 Total 0 0 0 0 01 34 50 0 0 841 0 0 117 0 1171 8 0 0 0 81 209 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 21 0 0 36 0 0 56 0 56 1 0 0 0 1 93 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 24 0 0 34 0 0 72 0 72 2 0 0 0 2 108 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 14 24 0 0 38 0 0 61 0 61 1 0 0 0 1 100 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 16 20 0 0 36 0 0 76 0 76 9 0 0 0 9 121 Total 0 0 0 0 0 55 89 0 0 144 0 0 265 0 265 13 0 0 0 13 422 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 31 0 0 46 0 0 73 0 73 6 0 0 0 6 125 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 47 0 0 60 0 0 74 0 74 13 0 0 0 13 147 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 14 29 0 0 43 0 0 72 0 72 14 0 0 0 14 129 12:45 PM 0 12 26 0 0 38 0 0 8 0 7 0 0 0 17 138 Total 0 0 0 0 0 54 133 0 0 187 0 0 302 0 302 50 0 0 0 50 539 01:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 0 0 44 0 0 99 0 99 10 0 0 0 10 153 01:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 11 31 0 0 42 0 0 75 0 75 6 0 0 0 6 123 01:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 0 0 38 0 0 84 0 84 3 0 0 0 3 125 01-45 PM 0 77 14 0 0 0 1 5 Total 0 0 0 0 0 46 122 0 0 158 0 0 335 0 3351 33 0 0 0 33 536 02:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 23 0 0 320 0 87 0 87 16 0 0 0 16 135 02:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 28 0 0 37 0 0 70 0 70 20 0 0 0 20 127 Grand Taal 0 0 0 0 0 207 445 0 0 652 0 0 1176 0 1176 140 0 0 0 140 1968 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 31.7 68.3 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 10.5 22.6 0 0 33.1 0 0 59.8 0 59.8 7.1 0 0 0 7.1 ApG WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 6 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 6 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000006 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 2 eak dour Analysts From 10: nM to 02:19 PM - Peak 1 Or 1 RR reaK Hour for Southdale Ent From North Southdale Ent From East Southdale Ent From South Souihdale Ent From t Right Thru ft Peds ToUi Right Th ft Pads tm,t R' ht Thtu L ft Pads tem ht Thru ft Peds Tom eak dour Analysts From 10: nM to 02:19 PM - Peak 1 Or 1 RR reaK Hour for Entire tmersecrlon Begins at 1z:19 FM 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 47 0 0 6o 0 0 74 0 74 13 0 0 0 13 147 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 14 29 0 0 43 0 0 72 0 72 14 0 0 0 14 129 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 26 0 0 38 0 0 83 0 83 17 0 0 0 17 138 01:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 0 0 44 0 0 99 0 99 10 0 0 0 10 J63 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 54 131 0 0 185 0 0 328 0 328 54 0 0 0 .54 567 S5 A. Total 0 0 0 0 29.2 70.8 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 F 1 .000 000 .000 .000 .697 .00 71 1 .000 .000 .828 .000 --&2-81--794 .000 .000 .000 .794 .926 Southdale En't In To� Folk I 54E 01 01 01 01I Right Tru Left Peds Peak Hour Data 1 c Peak Hour begins at 12:15 P 3 m r S +1 T r F--5-41 EIR EEO out In Total AV WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 7 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 7 2:30-6:30 pm Site Code : 00000007 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/10/2012 90's Page No : 1 Southdale I southdale I Southdale I southdale 02:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 23 0 3 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 28 02.45 PM 00 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 29 0 5 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 35 Total 0 0 0 0 01 0 51 1 0 521 0 8 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 01 63 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 9 3 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 37 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 25 0 0 27 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 28 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 19 0 3 5 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 27 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24 Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 91 0 0 94 0 13 9 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 116 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 19 0 3 6 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 28 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 31 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 35 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 6 5 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 4. -45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 0 4 10 0 0 0 0 0 38 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 102 0 0 103 0 15 19 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 137 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 1 0 27 0 3 7 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 37 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 0 0 29 0 7 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 41 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 0 0 28 0 6 11 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 45 06-45 PIVI 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 36 0 6 5 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 47 Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 115 1 0 120 0 22 28 0 501 0 0 0 0 0 170 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 0 0 170 5 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 25 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 35 0 0 36 0 5 12 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 53 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 11 409 2 0 422 0 68 73 1 142 0 0 0 0 0 564 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 2.6 96.9 0.5 0 0 47.9 51.4 0.7 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 2 72.5 0.4 0 74.8 0 12.1 12.9 0.2 25.2 0 0 0 0 0 Al J� WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 7 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 7 2:30-6:30 pm Site Code : 00000007 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/10/2012 90's Page No :2 noun nna,ysis HoM 04.30 HVl W vol o FAA - reaK 7 of! reaK flour for Southdale southdale Southdale Southdale rom North From s South m W t Start Time R ht Thru L ft Peds Twp Ri ht Thru Left Peds r°m R' t Thru Left Peds I AjwRl ht IThru I Left I Peds I A..T° w I noun nna,ysis HoM 04.30 HVl W vol o FAA - reaK 7 of! reaK flour for Enure Intersection Ese9ins at u5:uu PM 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 1 0 27 0 3 7 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 37 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 0 0 29 0 7 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 41 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 27 0 0 28 0 6 11 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 45 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 36 0 6 5 0 11 0 0 47 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 4 115 1 0 120 0 22 28 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 170 °% A. Total 0 0 0 0 3.3 95.8 0.8 0 0 44 56 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 1 .000 000 .000 .000 000 .500 .799 .250 .000' .833 .000 78 .636 .000 .000 .000 000 .000 .904 Southdale--DW In r Total i zt31 E 01 01 01 gj RI ht Thru Le, fl Peds Peak Hour Data 1 North Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 P S ra td r- a, a � +, T r E 281 221 .1 0 0 Out In Total WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 7 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's File Name : Southdale Ent -site 7 -sat Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 1 southdale 02:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 1 0 39 0 5 5 1 11 1 00 0 0 0 50 02.45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 33 0 8 4 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 45 Total 0 0 0 0 01 0 71 1 0 721 0 13 9 1 231 0 0 0 0 01 95 03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 29 0 9 6 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 44 03:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 29 0 0 31 0 4 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 38 03:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 32 1 0 34 0 8 5 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 47 03:45 PIVI 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 2 0 31 0 7 4 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 42 Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 119 3 0 125 0 28 18 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 171 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 1 0 25 0 2 8 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 35 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 39 0 5 7 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 51 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 1 0 30 0 4 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 36 04:45 PIVI 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 32 0 2 5 0 7 0 0 0 39 Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 123 2 0 126 0 13 22 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 161 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 1 0 42 0 5 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 50 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 0 0 37 0 8 5 0 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 50 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 33 1 0 35 0 6 4 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 45 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 41 0 9 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 149 2 0 155 0 28 14 0 421 0 0 0 0 0 197 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 26 0 0 28 0 12 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 44 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 0 0 32 0 4 5 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 41 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 11 519 8 0 538 0 98 72 1 171 0 0 0 0 0 709 Apprch % 0 0 0 0 2 96.5 1.5 0 0 57.3 42.1 0.6 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 0 0 0 0 1.6 73.2 1.1 0 75.9 0 13.8 10.2 0.1 24.1 0 0 0 0 0 413,0 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 7 2:30-6:30 pm Edina, MN 90's File Name : Southdale Ent -site 7 -sat Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 7/10/2012 Page No : 2 reaR nuuf hnaryeia ruin vc:au rm to uo: to rm - reaR t of t Southdale Erom North FRWight southdale From East Southdale FCQ SouthFrom southdale Wes I Start Time I Thru I Left I Peds I A.-r.w I Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I Amy... I Right I Thru I Left I Peds Right I Thru I Left I Peds I A..Tw reaR nuuf hnaryeia ruin vc:au rm to uo: to rm - reaR t of t Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 1 0 42 0 5 3 0 8 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 0 0 37 0 8 5 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 33 1 0 35 0 6 4 010 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0 41 0 9 2 0 11 0 0 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 4 149 2 0 155 0 28 14 0 421 0 0 0 0 Out Southdale - Inr T I 31 1 all E 01 01 01 01 Right Th LpR Peds Peak Hour Data North 4—e A - Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 P Unshifted r pJ= a � m +, ? r Peds Out In Total A[3 i Int Tolai 0 50 0 50 0 45 0 S2 0 197 see map for site 10 2:30-6:30 Edina, MN 90's WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN Ent I Southdale Ent 02:30 PM 0 16 42 0 58 I 0 0 0 0 02.45 PM I 0 17 61 0 78 0 0 0 0 Total 1 0 33 103 0 1361 0 0 0 0 03:00 PM 0 17 51 0 68 0 0 0 0 03:15 PM 0 15 59 0 74 0 0 0 0 03:30 PM 0 20 58 0 78 0 0 0 0 3:4 0 5 46 0 81 0 0 0 0 Total 0 87 214 0 301 0 0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 7 76 0 83 0 0 0 0 04:15 PM 0 24 49 2 75 0 0 0 0 04:30 PM 0 19 44 2 65 0 0 0 0 PM 0 .04:45 TOW 0 81 219 4 304 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 34 49 0 83 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 29 68 0 97 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 18 65 0 83 0 0 0 0 Total 0 104 218 0 322 0 0 0 0 06:00 PM 0 26 60 0 86 0 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 21 35 0 56 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 352 849 4 1205 0 0 0 0 Approh °% 0 29.2 70.5 0.3 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 29.2 70.5 0.3 100 0 0 0 0 Southdale Ent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 AIxa- File Name : Southdale Ent -site 10 Site Code : 00000010 Start Date : 7/11/2012 Page No : 1 Southdale Ent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 058 0 78 0 136 06" 0 74 0 78 0 81 01 301 01 83 0 75 0 65 0 83 0 97 0 83 0 59 01 322 0 8B 0 56 0 1205 0 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 10 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 10 2:30-6:30 Site Code : 00000010 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/11/2012 90's Page No :2 can nvui nnalys s rWa1 o4m rm W uo. la r1V1 - rea6 1 at 1 Int. Total Teak Hour for Southdale Ent Southdale Ent Southdale Ent Southdale Ent Irth From East From South From ftal St i Ri ht Thru left Peds Tom Ri ht Thru Le Peds R ht T iru Left Peds To Right Thru L Pads .Tom can nvui nnalys s rWa1 o4m rm W uo. la r1V1 - rea6 1 at 1 Int. Total Teak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 0 31 50 0 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 05:00 PM 0 34 49 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 05:15 PM 0 29 68 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 05:30 PM 0 18 65 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 83 Total Volume 0 112 232 0 344 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 344 %A . Total 0 32.6 67.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .824 00 .887 .00 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .887 Southdale Ent T QIW E"'!!@o1 1121 232 0 L4J Righl Thru Lalft Peds Peak Hour Data 1 � � North ~-1 Peak Hour Begins at 04:48 P 3 Unjhlfted r� +, T r © o Out In Total At?3 WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 10 File Name : Southdale Ent -site 10 -sat 10:30-2:30 Site Code : 00000010 Edina, MN Start Date : 7/21/2012 pt cloudy Page No : 1 Southdale Ent I Southdale Ent I Southdale Ent I Southdale Ent M � ( I 10:45 AMI 0 39 51 0 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 I 90 Total 0 77 74 0 151 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 01 151 11:00 AM 0 6 18 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 11:15 AM 0 23 39 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 11:30 AM 0 32 44 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 11:4 AM 0 38 59 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 Total 0 99 160 0 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 259 12:00 PM 0 39 60 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 12:15 PM 0 33 51 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 12:30 PM 0 28 45 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 12:45 PM 0 32 46 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Total 0 132 202 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 334 01:00 PM 0 23 60 0 83 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 83 01:15 PM 0 22 55 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 01:30 PM 0 27 60 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 01:45 PM 0 26 62 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 §8 Total 0 98 237 0 335 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 335 02:00 PM 0 38 61 0 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 02:15 PM 0 16 48 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 Grand Total 1 0 460 782 0 1242 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1242 Apprch % 0 37 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 0 37 63 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M � WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Ave S Minneapolis, MN see map for site 10 10:30-2:30 Edina, MN pt cloudy File Name : Southdale Ent -site 10 -sat Site Code : 00000010 Start Date : 7/21/2012 Page No : 2 Southdale Ent orth Southdale Ent East Southdale Ent From South Southdale Ent F m Start T Right hru Left Peds Right Th ru Left Peds .T m R ht Thru I Left I Peds romi I Right I Thru I Left Peds I, Peak Hour Analysis From 10:30 AM to 02:15 PM -_Peak 1 of 1 mi coal reaK Flour Tor Enure intersection begins at 17:3U AM 11:30 AM 0 32 44 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 11:45 AM 0 38 59 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 12:00 PM 0 39 600 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 12:15 PM 0 33 51 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total volume 0 142 214 0 356 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 356 % App.Total 0 39.9 60.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 1 .000 10 .892 .000 .899 .000 .000 .000 .000 0 .000 .000 ;000 .000 000 000 .000 .000 .000 _ @99 Southdale EnrtOut In T otal 1-356 1 01 1421 2141- 0 Right Th Left Peds Peak Hour Data 1 2 North w a A s °-2 Peak Hour Begins at 11:30 3 u .� I 41 T F► ds ® o Out In Total 413 Dro.lrfEuf nnnn mr-MM nnnn nerl"m nnnn nrino SWff eshnW. n&—y w1ee11 2074 PM Nor66.n • W.Wft M.—..Fgm.w n.. K1016/5J401T.fgdSpdwoAM14WMWa SAM014 PM NO BUILO MOE. TAM(MM) &12M12 M mmmommmemn®©nameen nnno emmem®�® mer��nr�e�ea�eamnnmmt�nem nnn '®nnmmr�� r��s�nnr�nnr7 e��r�©omoeomm�nmmann nnn r*innmtme�e�e*�r7 Qo©moeo®oe©©nmmomm nno oenec�enmennmemmmemmnnnn m��nennr oe�en�es�ememne�mr�nemnnnnn��mnn�nnn�� rs'nm��mm�mnmm®r.�mne�nr.�nnm.n e�n��n�n�e mom©mn000n©n000nnnnnn©n neennnnnnnnmmnnne�nnnOrl mmnnnnnnn am©mmemenMMM mnnnnnnnnmmnnmmnnnnnnnn MMMMMM=MM mna©mnmeenmm=mmnnHnnnnn r ��■� Hnnnnnnnnrnnnnmmnnneinnnn�■�� mnonommnen=mm�mnnnnnno® mnnnnr_m=m= em®em®ewe®®®nm®mmmm r�nn"�'mmmmtmr*i�■�� r,�e�e�ne�nn�n�mm�nmr.*�en®es n , mn�a*..»e-��■�� en�nrtr�ner�er� mmm�enrr�m HH nnn" rr "Mmtmrm"Mm mmmmoemmmo®nnn®me®© e® ©mnm®e�� ©�mnmmnmm�nnm®mnnnc�nn0n mnn�nnnn� r+�e�e�r�e ne�mm�nne©c nnnnnnmt�s��mmmmnnmsm mnnnnnnnnmmnnemnnnnnnnm mmmmmmmmm mnn©ann0®onmomonnn©nnnn e�n��■��®� oeonmomn©nnn®mmnnnnnnno e�n�nn�� c�mmnmnnmmnnnmrmmnnnnnn"m mnmmmmnmm mnnnnnnnnnnnnmesnnnnnnnn mnnnnmmmm mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnnnn n�■�� en®©mn�e�nm®mmenm®nnnnn m��nme�n� c-�e�ne��er�ner�mnne�■mr�nnn nnne� , �e�ne�ne��n r�nr�nnss-�e�e. r�e�e�nrir��ennc�nr�n®®mesmn .nnno mcm®mm0emHnnnmmme©m nnm0 a©mnn®■��n mmmnmm=nmmmn©mmmnnnnnen mnr�mto�n�� cAnnnnnnnnrnHnnmornnnnnnc�nnnnm""m mr�e�re�nm�e�ne�nna�mmm�nnnnn m��nnm.mtnee� mnnnnnnnnnnnmmmnnnnnnnn mn=nnMMMM onnnnnnnnnennmmnnnnnne ©'�enn�■�� r* �nnnnnnnnnnneemnnnnnnns ennnr■■�m,nn rn�mne��e�r�e�mrir�nr�rnnnnnnne� e��m,n�� mnnnnnnnnnnnemmnnnnnnnn m�� moo�m�nn�nr�nn®momnnr�n©n me®em®mnn r nr++�es mr++�n srtennnnmr rem . nnn■s r+smnrmy"Irl rotes t mno�o©oe�c�©nnnmmr�esm nn®rs�'e�s�®gin®nmrr me��mom®®nm®mmeem nnnn eeee®e®moo K1016/5J401T.fgdSpdwoAM14WMWa SAM014 PM NO BUILO MOE. TAM(MM) &12M12 M i& W.U.M. 21 1.. s'-, W124812 CN1 o:l".. lT2-Waltday Mnuu•/EOeNvens� KWINS-340tT,aMol.%-hro120141PM% MM Alt 2%2014 Ptd BUILD ALT 2 MOEe TAB: (MOE.1 4(31 M2012 mm®prom®mron®memm©ennnnne mmmmmo©mm r�ee��ne�n�e�±•�ec�ese�ne�rr,�ne�ennnno rsmrmeemrerm�ar*�nnnemm©eir�n mommmnm®o©®nmmme©nnon�e nnn r*�r�mmr_�mm mrramc� mm®mmmmmm mr� n myrs m® mn®©oom®Q©nno©e mmn©000nrnaome r�©m orlrinoeennnnnn"e rim= immmmr�mmm mmnesmorsesrrsemnnsam®rnn©nnnm.n m®©omoomnoom®mnnnnooe© �mmmmmr�mnm ommmdmmmm riomrimmmoononn©mennnnnr�rmt mmmmms mmm mmmmMnFmrmmmmnmntr.�ennnnnm.n mmmmm mmmm r�nnnmennrmnHHHHr�©nnnnn"e mm©nmmmHmmmnmmmnnn"nno e`rlmmmrmemmm rAmmm®®mmm nnnnnnnnnmmneomnnnnnnlR esmmmmmmmm nmmnMnr*ln®mmHmmnr+jnnnnnnen �rmmmmmmms�m mmmm©mmmm csnnmmnnmrsnHHHHmnnennnen mmmnmmmnmmmnm®mnnnnnnoo mmmmmin mm®o®mom©mnono©moem nn©e MIMEMM®mmmm oemennrmmm�nneeoeme � ��memm®mmmm r+rr±�rne�raer�rme�nne�mr�ooesn mmrtemmm®mc�n�r®®mmmom mmmesrmmrjrmmnm©©rmmnnnnnneo n�■ne em memmme®e�m ®mmmm©mmm emmmommmm r. �mm�mmrme�!�mHHnHmmnHHnnnem rlmmmnnmmm mnnnnnnnnnnnHHHHnnnnnm N mmmmmmmmm mnoomne©®mmHe®mnnnnn®en mmmm■ mmmm mmnnmnmmnomnmwmmnnnnnnmtoe©©mmmmmm mormnrmHm"m©on©®rmnHnnnnm� ommm®nmmm r* Hnemnnm®nHHmmmnnnnnnee mnommmmmm mn©monmmmn©m©®mn©anon©�■ mmmmmmmmm mm®opo o®n®®m®macs© n0mo a©mmmcmmmm mm®mmm�nrmr rmm�n©Demes c.irarmrmnmrmrmrommnmmmnnn nn"" nrs rimmonmmmimmmm mMmmmMmmm mmmmmmommnm®mfnnm©m®nn©a r�mmmmmomm mmonm0inniommnm®mmnnnneen omeommmmm HnnnnnnnnnnHmeonnnnnnHn��Mmmmmmnnm r+��n�enr�rt�HMHmmmHmer�mnnnnnHr onnnnnnnnmmno©mnnnnnnen " mmmmmAmem mmmmmmmmm mnnoonneonmmm®mnemennee mmnnmmnnrennna�monnnnnnen rirmmn®me�nommnn®mennnnnne jrl=mmmmWm mmmmmmmmm mmmanmmmm mnnnnonnnmmHommnnnoonoe rmmmmmmmmm oommromomm©mnm®me©nn000■s��m000me�amm r�r r�r r7nr�e nnem■rir�e±�e�n nnnn rTIMMM0mnmm mnrmmmmr-iemnmmnmmem©m mmmo�m®r��®®nm©moan nvI non mmmmmme■mmm em©em0ome KWINS-340tT,aMol.%-hro120141PM% MM Alt 2%2014 Ptd BUILD ALT 2 MOEe TAB: (MOE.1 4(31 M2012 amnmo aNwanon �y W7MIt 9a1.PN KURD -Vtuiday Howe. WR'..0[e6wiKu K:101686-3401TI.tk%Sr,JUo120301PMftnd Mt 112030 PM BLXDALT 1 MOE. TAB: PAGE.] MI AM92012 �0©Om0©©m00©cm© DD©D©©®®©®� mm®ommmo�nnn®common rTnIr Villa 17 Immmnm="W.v mmo©mesr�©�©®n®�®Hmn mnmmmnmmmn" o®nmr3mnmonnn=in mommmmmmmmonmwm rmne�mmr�mmmnnneem0nnnnnen•®��r mn"nnnnnn..."mconn©nnn©n mnnonnnc�nnnnnm®nnnoonno ! ren onno nnaa mm nnnn Hnn©®n n�n�mmmmm�!!'fm nnm Em m- eMm®ome©e0 �7n�tE7mm�� ram l"Em, o��aIMMM �Mw�■'�l7�l7� �"7��MM lmone mmm rim®meem®m® mmnmmrnnnnnnnamt��efl"wml rinnn"nnnnnnn®mmnne"nn"" mmm nM��nmm m®©nmomec�e®n©mmnnoonnm" mnnnnnnnnncinommnnnnen"■o nmmm®omm� MMMM rjnrpJmmnmnmnHnHl erjnnnnnnn eL"IMMM ��■ mnnm"nnnWnnnnmmnnneein"" llr_mlmmm nMMMM m� r-immnonommnmnmmmnnnn®no mm®©mm®©�®nn©mm000 c mmnmmmnmmmnm®e*�em© mne�m emees nmte©mmemn mommommmo®nmm©mo©m moommoemoesnome�m�■nnnena© rr�ememmmmennnmmr�nnnnneen rrinnnnnnnnnnnnr4 oono nn�® nnnnn"" amu MR w o�n,�■©mmsm ommooeMMM rr�nea�on r�memmmmmm rim= n��nn�r�� nmm®mmmm ninnMMM WnwMmm onnoonoemnnn®®mnnnoennn FUSHHennmennnemmnnnnn ononmmono®nn®®onnneenno��©�M��ammmm m r��mmnnmmm rl MMMM MMMmm� Mm® r+ �nnnnnnnnnnnn®mnnnnnnemt mnomnn©®on©nommn©nnno®e em®®m©moo®moom000©® c e e�mommmrmm�nenmr rimmmmm®ec»nnnnmmmne comm®mmmmmnnn®©memm mmmnmm�mmHon©mmnnnnnnoe"onoo��m� rHnnnnnnnnnnee®c�nneenmm� rin�r3mn®mimnnninmrinnnnn mnnnnnnnnnnnmmmnnnnnoH mmnnmmnnnmmnnemnnn®nne Hnnoonneonnnmminnnm©ommHIMMMEMMMM mmwlnmmmnm®nnnmemnnne0e mnnnnnnnnnnnnoonnnar�oo a mei nn©a nnn" nn®e nm ern lNMMmM ©nl�M ©emeesmme®e mmmmmr o��MEN r-��■ee m��nlnmmmm r ©��a��®WE= n�"MM mm®mn®MMM mmmm ��m�n.a�MM M�m� mmm comm mmm mmm mM Doom®©om®en©®®moonn©nn"llpr2 t r rnemooe®nnn®mmr�®n mr�r*�e r�nr!�eem©n©®emmem m®mm�ommm®mHHHHHHHHUHnn Dann ;Dann mte�smmmmwumm rlmmmmm"mm ©nmem®ne e©m®ems K:101686-3401TI.tk%Sr,JUo120301PMftnd Mt 112030 PM BLXDALT 1 MOE. TAB: PAGE.] MI AM92012 i 3333333333333333333 3333333333333333333333330i 03030330227303300309023®30000330333003©©03330 033303030378®39902300233®33003303339303003380 333800030330033093a03039300003003333333003330 931003300®78383800300233333339303330033093390 093303302070333003222298333303223330093003330 033003333339039902323230333900303739333033380 03300200002033000302333333300900033300303333© 933020000839®333©3303233313930320333®33©03380 ®2000900022020000200022©0022022002®00000©0220 ®0300000032®o2v®o2o3®30©0��o0232Q�ov©©©o®©�®v 0®0222202®4290290202020©®©022002©722220000700 sa®®o�o�v®v®asa�0�0oaaao®vao�oaaoaloo��oa 133003310133333133103333303033333133333003331 33333333333333333333033333333333333333333330 090020222229©090229020209©0022222'90000©03030 000©272027720330©202020009300770077©02000090© 097022290790039002272702923920722920020©23700 o0aaaoaaoo{ 02220�a2 20220220202072720 0200000070007`000000000 070000200a7002�000000000000072007©a0aa002aa© 0000702200002023'20 oaa0oao0oo2a02�a00000aao02�ooao0oaa0o2000aa0� : . 022000000a2oo2000000aao aaoaaooa000a000a2oa ©moo©0000©o� . 0000000oo.�oa 333033333333333033303330333333333330333333330 0030101111101300101011110300111111111111031 33301A01111313301010111103301111111111113333 O, 33331311111313331111111133331111111111113333H 3330101111110333111101113333311133'330a300370M 333013111311033011111130033301313330013003301 01001110112101011111111110111111111111111100� �� a33A1113100101011111111110111'11111110111303 _ 303111111a11113111111111191111111111101110330 sknhNsask.do-S—y TW M12 RaNkns Ss12 sa W daY �Q+k NnaVaa a/RReativanaaa K1018b61001TroMcWy�chro1201215AT12012SAT 6AOEa TA13:PMOEs1 Mk4 C/2M12 oo ®mFqFmFqFqo moo©=oo©moo©m© p mmr�nern�r*��cr�eeneemnne nn©e mcg®enteE*�e�n■n momnoom®m©eee®memnn emo ®iimiiili ��m©�f0��m©�®Boomnanmo miiiE7t7®®D L"17©l�i�®L�fG7m0�s%Ef©®m�ee�f©/�E�e DE�i�ieiii miiir,��e�� mm®ommn®®n©nmmeo©nnneme mn®®onm®onn©mmmnn0000eo Diiil©ill'. ©nnoennoonn®®®mnn000eeo aliili�Di 1!!7l�Esf�'fC�f�!!R}EflSl�©eee�!!1t47oe��ne� DeE%l�iiiii�i 0eenennnnnr�n®r�mnnn©®nemt !'�iiiilE7!'�i� �m©©DEFIE.�E�lO©��®mnBnnnooe n®®miiiil �nnnn�nnnnen0mmnnnone�■s ©iiililii !"7��ESlr!fnE'lmmeeoA�i!�D��IEf��1"7iii�!l5liii mn�nnnn�enr�nemrnnnee©ewe miiliilll mnenon©non®n®®mnOO��a00 ®lii0miii m®mmoc�®snm�mnmt®mommas ergo L'7®DA®onnoonno®ennn®��0 OliiOE'fiii mr�nnne�e�nene©ennnne�m,� lFfiiiliili mnnoennoenn©©mmnnnnn000 miiiiiiii mm®ase®en©none®1.*7©nneooeo miiiDilii D�m��Am��OOd®mnnneeee©'�0iliiliil mnnn�e�nnnneec�mnnneeeoe c*fiiiiiili mnnnnnneinnnnemmnnn00000 �iiiiiiii {� mnmo®��©®D®onemonnoo l�iiimmiii IY�i m®F�n�"+1�[+if�m��®mom©eA�B�A Eif�m�'3fi![�iii m�©mm��m©onoomc�ennnn�o m©ml®ilii r�ne�n�e�e��er�nnn©®e�■e��e�iiiiie�i e�ne+�m�nmm�nme®mmennnneee �'+7illl��E'�ieli mnnnnnnnnnnnommnnnnne�■o Biiliiiii ennnnnnnnennommnnnoeeoo miiiliili mnnnnnnnnmmnmr2mnnnnnnmm miliiilil 8 me€mm�mme�nonnnne�mnnneeeae mililiili mnnnnnnnnnonnmmnnnnnnoo mmiiiiiii mom®��®mom©e®m®oemenoomo miiE7imili om©meemmem®n©Q�eor�nenr.�oe��©l7iAe'lmill mee�ne+nnmme+:�e�■®ntmmr�nn : ee�e a©�m��m® mmomommmm©on�smeoeo oome a®mente�li K1018b61001TroMcWy�chro1201215AT12012SAT 6AOEa TA13:PMOEs1 Mk4 C/2M12 a.,n.rtk. a—T vmmoi2 2814SATMOLGALTt ew.amaaert.�aa K -.WIG -340 T.fl. "d.o%2014\SAlM3,Ad AN 112014 SAT BUILD ALT 1 MOE$ TAB: [MO&I Arcs" memmm©®own®onmmm©n : nn®�� Dn®o®�®me m©mmm®mmonnn®®aeon eon nommomm�m ®OmCltL•7©mmmm0®nBm��m[! O®n ®mmme�e�©�� r�ne�nmmnmm®nese©�mnnnn®n©n��mt®elf®nm�m mm©momnmone,®®mmnr�m - nein e+�mmmreme�e�e� mnoamnmman®©me�mnnnn©nee mmmmnmmmm r.�nnmmnnmmnn�e�©onnne�noo®��o��oo� c�r�me�oemmmnnneee�mnnnnenAn mne�en�mmmmm mnnnrenne�e�nnn©me�nnnnnn�n mmmmmme�e�m mm000a®c�mm�nn®omneanonn® emmese�mme■ HHHHnnnnennnnmennnennn© mm�mmmmmm c�mm�r�mm�r�nnei��ne-�ne�nnnn�n ��©� mmmmmmmmm e*�nnnennnnnnn©®aennnnnn©© r nonc�nemmm�nnnmran©neon©n mmmme mmmm omrmor�m®o�nnon®Deem nndn��mm®mM®mmm r�r�mc�mr�mc�mneeneese�r.-�r�me nes r�©mmmmmmm meenm�nmm�©m©®mmemn nn®e e�e�e±emr��mmem mmr�mmmmQmm�n©neoomo n® mmmmmmmmm ©o®mmo©mmne�nm©eoonnnnQn mmmm0cemon �e�eee+•�m�enemnnen�mmnnnennn'�ml�■mse�mmmm HnnnnnnennnHnHmnnnnnnen mmmmmmmmm mnnaenoemnnnoe.�mnnnnnn" mmmmmnmmm omneonnmonn©e�onanneoe©��me�e�mmmmmm Ae®n000nononn®mnnnnn©en mmmmmmmmm ennnnc�nnnennne®mnnnnnnnn me�nmmmmmm mnomonommnnn©mr�n®noon©n mmmmmmmmm em�r�mom0�®onm®memm nn©n ommomammm me-�mtne�mnmmmnnmr�r�n�mm nce ' r�e�mmmmnmm mmmm�®©m�nnenme�e®en nn©- r�mmmmr�mmm r�mnmommomn®nn®oeo�e no®e ommm®mnmm e®nomnmmm �=memnmm�mm�mn®®mmne�nnne■n r�nnrennnnnnnnnmr�nnnneee�nn . ommmmmme�m roti®m®nme�nnn�eemnennnnon��r�mmme�mmn�t rjnnnnnnnnHmHHmHHnmnnnnn ommmmmmmm mo©0on©eene�n®e�cnnnm©nn©© ommmmmme m cne nne!!Imnmmmanmmonnnnnnan mmmmmmmmm moron®omn®ne�neemmennnene�n e+�me�memmmm mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnHHH"M ommmmmmmm m000�mmmmm©n®®eomnnnnnn rimmmmmmWom mm®©memeoe®nm®rye®n r+immm®mmlmm mer�r�nmmrsr.�n�n©mmeere : nnn� mnmmmmmmm mmomom®monne.n®mo©n . nne�n ®ono®ommm K -.WIG -340 T.fl. "d.o%2014\SAlM3,Ad AN 112014 SAT BUILD ALT 1 MOE$ TAB: [MO&I Arcs" vomit sin.iw,n twox+y u 4 SAI p1�sAT MII.0 KT2 Mxfufe MEfKINMms aar�myaawn/�.we�xiaie Mix�i[�rFm 0�� 000moo©®oaomo v©oEM 0000000 �e®��m eo®®o©moo��©oho©000Bomo��m�mm©®�� ©nmomomomoono©m©©©nee©e o��oo�� r'�nmmmner�mon�ne� r+�nn©onenn�� o��©m�� r�r�no®oemmnnnnemnnneeeen r��■��n,r��e� r�mm©mmm©mnnneo©nenoonoo o��r�m�� oo©omen©mm©ne©e©©©nen©e o��nto�� mr�mmr�nR;tne�r*�n�n®emnrsnenenn e��rs�n�� nnnnennnc�rnn�nntr�r±anne�nnnnn n��e�� MIM rloeonoonomnnnnnonn eMMM�ae�� ennnnnnnnnnn"vlMnnnnennn ren©ec�r�c►�nr*lnennmmenneenRim rr�nnne.nnnnnennrsmnnnnnnmmll mnc�non©nmoonomen©none©n mm®©gimme®mmm®moom oomo emmc�ooMMM r*Umms�mme emnone�r�e�n�m r�ww mt"®MMMMM� mnc�m�rr�mom�nnr�nr.�memn nen r�m,�e�,m,�m,em nmme�©mmm®nn�m,®aomn nom r�mms©s�� omnmooe®®oono©onnnneonna�o___no_0o nn�rnnr�e�enr�e�ne�nntmonnenee�s�n r��e�� r�n�nnnnnnn�nnntn�en�nmm� mt�� Homo®Haemes©nmmnne0000n ©��o©�� omnennnao®nnnmenn©oer�©m es�m�■�� ©c�mmm�mmm�a�ne©mnnneeean��o��n�� r+�nne�nmeme�nnnnt�nnnnnnenn on,n�� mnomon000nonn©en©anon©n n�� mm�nmmmeonmmn©oo©© nnom o00000�� mmnmm©ner�ms��nn®mec.�n. nmm ©®mmm®m.ntm�tt�s e*seomer�et*�emn�nentmme�e nne*�n MMMM"MMMM mm©omm®mo©nnnemmmnnnnem r��®moos oommmM®nm®000eomnnnnenooee=M=MM r9nnrne nWHHn"HNMr.�nnHHnH"n��©��n®� mom®smeflnninnntrnnnnneenn r!l=MMMM2nn® r�nnnnnnnnnnneeennn©onnn m��■�� mn000nnnMnnnnmonnnnnmmmm ��e��eo� m rmm�enm�nnnmonnnenenn MM"MMMMMM mm®noe�emm�on©�mnnnnennn mmrnm MMM� ©nnnnnnnnnnnn©mnnnnnnno oomm®mEm®mn�mnommonnoemm ©omon,00m� rImmem®mnonINnn ENHHHHnnn rnr�r*�r±.�cflmoesnnene■mmnne� onnn rye®�o�nr�� mmomommmo®mommoeon K1ot8W,UMTn11c%V.t.oM14'MT%B.Nd Ah WON SAT SULOALT 2 MM TAB:IMOESI &MO12 s00TrAk0 Mamms-ry UUM12 7030$AT NO EUID Nea3vet ofEEsslMnss K:10I0"O%T,.fllSy,.W.12030NSATWo Bu M30 SAT NO SURD MOB TAB:P4CL's) Mi 329f= ®®®® 000©m000�000�© ®loo ®©® B o©000©®m�� mo�m�©�o�none®mean nnnn oomnm0o®e r*�mmmr�mmmmnenmmo©rAn nnn n®��r»n® mmnrnr*�menne*�neenrnmrnnn nnnn e�mmmn�e�mer��rs memmo©mmo©no©mooen ®en me®memmm� momOmEameam®oo®®me©me . nmo mmmm®mo®o onenmmemme�nnnneoneBnee�e��onn�m,®�� mmemoe�nmee©n©nemeom nnn mmnmmmsnis�m mmm�onmmon©eomennnnonon m��nton�—� mnnmmnncienn®®mennoonnoo m��nn�. oenmenr�nmrsmnm©sn®cmnenennan mmmemmm�m mnnnnnnnnnnnmmmnnnnnnne emmmmmmmm. r.�m®oam�anm©mnmmennonnono om®meo�� mnnnnnnnonnnommnnnnnnee mmMmmmmmm mmm�r�nnr*�mmne�nmmmn®nnnnnn r*��_a�i mnnnnnnnnmmnmmmnnnnnnoe mmmmmmmmm, onononon000no®oo©neooen mmmmmmmmm mm�nnneene©n��nom mnnnene�A�� ©mmmmem■mi■�! mnnnnnnnnrnnnmmmnnnnnnne mmmmmmmmm! mnnnnnnennn®®®mnnnnnno0 mmmmmsmmm oeonne©Henan®�©enneeee© e�mmmoem®m ommHmmmHmnnnemHnnnnnnem onmmmmm®m mnnnnnnnnnnnnmmnnnnnnne mmmmmmmmm mnnnnnnnooenomennn®0000 cmmmmmmmmm mn®omnrt o�nmm®®en®moonmo m mm—om=m m�onmmmmwmi mmnmmmnmmmmnmwvmnnn nnnn m HHMnHeraMmmniHnmmmn®n . nnnn tnmmmmmmmm em®mmm®®m©000meoon none me®ten®msm mmmnenno mm®am®mmm mnnninnnnnnmm®nm®nm©mnnn©®encnnnnnnnnUM mmmmmm""m mnmmmnmmmmmneemnnnnnnm" mmmmmmmmm monnnnnonnnnomonnneoeoe ®mmmmmmmm mnnnnnnmmnmnmmmnnnnnnoo®mmmmmmm� mmingm. rmmmmnmnmemnnnnnnmm mnnmmmmmi mnnnnnnnnnnnommnnHnnnom mmmmmmmmm om®omIam©moo®®®eo0ennomn e®mom©o©� mmmmmmmm®e®nme®mo©©n . nn mmmmmm_mm mnHHHHHHHHHnnmmmnm nnnn mmmmmmemn m®omomomonnnemeeon Henn enee®e.®. K:10I0"O%T,.fllSy,.W.12030NSATWo Bu M30 SAT NO SURD MOB TAB:P4CL's) Mi 329f= SraT.M. sk.""— 2un.a 7 s"M12 2tla2ATBUkDALT1 U -ME Ki016B6-34%TraftftndwoMffi8AraM Ak 11m20 SAT BIRLD ALT I M0E. TAB: IMON PA O/IM12 me®mmn�m�®omm®mn©n . ooan mooemmmem mme�me�e�me�r*�nssnnmr�r�r�n . nr�r��om®e-ic�me�®� ©mo©e�nnr�eso®nnmenmr±imn nns�n r*�mne�mme�me�� mem®o©omonen©omc�on °non oemmoo�� m©memmn000nnomm©®m© nmo��c��oo©oo c�neznmmmmmr�nn©emmnnnneenn ememem�� me©©mmmmoemtn®mmnem ns�n c+��r�e�omm nnoomno©mom©®mmno©0000n e��om�� mnnmonnmonnoommnnonnnen o��c�©� oee!�mr*�e�nme-�nnnmmr�nnnnnnan r�mnm�� rnnn©nnnHnr HHHHmnnnnnnnn��m��e�n� moo0om000mm©omnm©nnennn ©©mmns�� c�nnnnnnnnnennmonnn©noon mmmmmmmmm nenr�r*�nnnr�nnnnsr�©nnnr�nne�n mmmmmmmmm e*inncvmnnnnmmnemnnnnnnnen mmmmmmnnm nncamm�onomm�en©en©nee©on o��nm�� mm©m�mmn®monm®moom ern©e mmmmomMMM r Imm�e-�ne�sne e�nnmeonr�n n . M"Mmmmmmm r�mr mmmomemnmmo©deme n mnmmmmwvmm moomQmemc�n©nm®name o0 ommm®m�� ooemo©omonnn®emnnoe�neoe ommmnmmmm r9"rmne lmrl"rj=mnmmr!lmmnnnenn �r��©n�� mmmm"mmmm r�nmmnnnnnmm�nmr±�nnennnnn r'��■�� nneeenean©no©nmennnn�eonn moneonnm0mnnoemnnennnon mne�r■�� meomm�mno®©nnmo©nne�nnan��mmmmmnmmm e±�nnnnnnnnnnnnennnn©nnnn mmmmmmmmm moomonomonnnommn©no©non mmmmmmmmm mm®©�omomne�©m©mmm® ne�oo� ammom®mmm mmmme-.�r.++�mmmmm�nmom�nn ns� enmmmm©me nennmert�r�om�esmnmmEmm�® a� mmmmmmmmm mmo©oommmnanm©em©®nneea o��mor�®� me�mnme�me®no®e©mm©neannn ©ooe�� nnnne�nn�ner�nnnnmr�nnnnnenn mm=mmmmmm r�ne�e�eE*in�m�nne�s��een®nr�r�ne�n��c��s�enmm mnnnnnnnnnonemejnnnonnon mnneonnnennnem mnnmoomm� emmmm=oo= omnne�onnmmnnmeonnnnnnan mmmmmmmmm nmr nmm®ne�nnnnmm©nnnnnnn mmmeer2mmm ononnnnnnnonommnnnne�onn e�� m000�nmmom©®e©om000n000n��momommnm� r*�me-ane-�mmne ®nn®eoe©n nnnn mmmmmmmmm c�c�r�r�r4nmm�rnne®m�nem . nnnr� mnmmmenmmm m®om©®oe�o©ono®moon .: noee m©meme�■�� Ki016B6-34%TraftftndwoMffi8AraM Ak 11m20 SAT BIRLD ALT I M0E. TAB: IMON PA O/IM12 sk.1vam aama+han sumory anaaau 2M SAT[U[DALT2 aWwns N[Ihs[veness K10t8[e-34MT,aMclSymhro'203MSA11Bu[d AN 2X2030 PM BUILD ALT 2 MOE. TAB:IMMI Al" ['29/2012 m om o�mQ® 000�000m�o©�© 0000©olm®mo ®"o"mFqao oo®mm©mo�ne®mm®mmm�nn®e ©omfoarT�o®a rimeIllrmrmrmm- mmnnnm"Hnnnnnnn , vilANNHWH mmo©oe�oc�mnnnnerr�nnnnnnr� gin®r�mr:�mmm r�emmmrnomonnommr�oonnnnne mo®sem®mmmm m©rs©�lBmr�mnOam®®©®©��®d rammmoommmi ��rl'mm roiriF'f1nrin, Inmm®n®n®Hnnnnnnnn� rnrr©orn®rnmrimmnmmrnnnnnnn" r±�mmmneemmt rlm""Mmmmmm WEmnnnnmn om mmmmmmmmm mcrrnerr�omemmnenno©©nnnnnme e�mmmoc�mmm r�ememnrimr mnavnmmmnrnnnnnan mmmmmmmmm mrnnr mmnHHHHnmmmni■tHHHUmn mmmmnnmmm nmme©maemn®nmomnenonnao rnmmmommmm mnnnnnnnnnnnom®nannnno■� mmmmmmmmm r inr*inr-mnrpimmnnnmmmnnnnnnnn mtmmmmmmmm rnnnHnnnnnnnnmmmrnnrnnnenn nmmmmmnnm nnc�nc�n®mm�®nmmmnnnnnneo rmmmmommmm o®m©�moocm�ar�oo®©oom en©e ©mtmc:��r�mmm r rne�rn nr+�mmmns�nmmr�rn®en n M! WNWImommm rnnr*�©�©me�nmo®mr nrnn nen rm"VNEmm"a vomm mo©mmoem®onnmmmomm oe mmmrmonmmmm momrnonemmde®mmennnnnnao mmmmmmmmm r+ nmemrnmee nn®ne©nnnnnnnne mmm"mmmm mnnnnnnnnnnnnHHnnnnnnnn mmmmmmmmm mn©�®n©m®n©ommmononnnoo mmmmn©mmm meneemn©©nnnmmmnnnnnmm� jr.-IMMENNEEMmemnrmrnonmmnn©mmnnnnnnon rnnnnnnnnnnnnn®mnnnnnnem mmmmmmmmm nnrmmnnnnrnnonommn©onnn® mmmmmmmmm o©en r3m oor-mlm Finnmr.mrimmmn®oe®onr H nno� enmmmmnmm �=om®c��m�omn®n®®om©rn .r*smr�e�et�mmm�nnenmrr�mer� nwurr»mm�mmm mrcirnmomemmenommmo©mnnnmo mmmmmmt mm oomn�emn�©®m®®mmnonnnoe oe�ommmmmm H- nnrimnnnnnmnmmmnnnnneneemmmmmnmm mnemmemnemmmnnnne+mmnnnnnnnn rmmmmrmemnm mnnnsnsnssnnmmr�snnnnnsn mmmmmmmmm onnoenneoamm®mmnnonn�ee®emmmmmaom emnnmmnmmHnnnmmnnnnnnme� mmmmmm �=mnnnonnnnnnoo©mnnnnn000 emmnm®mnmmmnmmmrnnnnnnme I mmmo®®mmm mmmmmmmmm mQmo�©®mmno®mm©mmnnnnoo mmmmmmmom momnmmmeo®n®c me-irnnn nn©nilmmmmmtmmmm m�nHHHH nrn©n©n®menre nnnn Mnmmtmmmm© mm®mm®omo©®nm®open nnnn omoe®emmm K10t8[e-34MT,aMclSymhro'203MSA11Bu[d AN 2X2030 PM BUILD ALT 2 MOE. TAB:IMMI Al" ['29/2012 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-123 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONCORDIA PROPERTIES LLC, SOUTHDALE SHOPPING CENTER THEATER AND RESTAURANT(RETAIL EXPANSION Cite Or 14dina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development plan dated October 18, 2000, for Concordia Properties, LLC, Southdale Shopping Center Theater and Restaurant/Retail Expansion presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on November 21, 2000, be and is hereby approved. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 21a1 day of November 2000. ATTEST: 4&-�AJQ City Clerk 1,, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the Cify of-Edinw-do-1 reby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution yeas-iiT adopted by tie -Edina City Counc' at its Regular Meeting of November 21, 2000, a),irdas recorded in the Minutes of sa - Regular Me c ing. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City�hisc-day of �'lylr�r-2 --�- 00 oc), oY'\' City Hall (952) 927.8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET rAX (952) 820.0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424-139.1 �'�-0 TDD (952) 826.0379 MinuteslEdina City Council/November 21, 2000 Conference and Section Championship. Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Kelly introducing the following resolutioin and moving its approval: RESOLLrITQN NO. 2000-118 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION _ BDINA HIGH SCHOOL 2000 BOYS' SOCCER TEAM WHEREAS, the members• of the Edina High School 2000 Boys' Soccer were Champions of the Classic Lake Conference, Section Champions and. State Ch ns; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of ' the Team ause of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice. and the leadership of their coache I d WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the mbers of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good ortsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the Edina Ci ouncil that con gr ane be extended to the members of the Team; Sam Awsumb Andy Witchger Benjamin tom Jonathan Lewis Patrick Cronan Nicola orns Erik Nichols Alexander Darb Pet rgensen' Terence O'Connell Robert JG Lund Daniel Roddy Philip Jo n thong Ruben Jeffrey Shideman Perek L quiet Aaron Witchger Jeffrey Strickland Eric S ver David Jenson, Coach Tommy Weber/ooveimber, York Bill Garner, Asst Coach BE IT FURTHER Rthis resoluti be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and than to memb of the Team. ADOPTED this 210t 2000. Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Ma Resolution adopted. -x V VA DO wrIng =kxUbAA&tSUI li Ub VK INUVH 6 2000 "PROVED Motion made by Member H land and seconded by Member Kelly approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 6; 2000, approved. Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN POR CONCORDIA PROPERTIES, L.L.C. APPROVED, (SOUTHDALE SHOPPING CENTER) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained the owners of Southdale have submitted a request for Final Development Plan approval to allow the construction of an addition to the center containing a floor area of 120,007 square feet. The addition would house a 16 -screen theater and two new restaurants. The theater would have a seating capacity of 3,959. The proposed addition would Increase the total floor area of the center from 1,248,517 to 1,368,524 square feet The additions would be located adjacent to the southwest corner of the center in an area now used for parking ' and for transit operations. The additions would result in a reduction of the total on-site parking from the current 7,104 spaces to 6,686 spaces. `�\ Page 3 MinuteslEdina City Council/November 21 2000 Scott Pollack, Aerostreet,p orf t� ect architect, gave a presentation using graphics of the proposed expansion. Mr. Pollack noted the expansion is proposed for the southwest corner of the site with the theater being placed between the existing truck tunnel and the existing parking deck. The ring road will be moved further out to maximize the petrking inside of the ring road that would be more comfortable to the customers. Mr. Pollack explained there are two parking fields' one east and one west of the expansion, both at different levels. From the lower parking field, there will be two entrances, the lobby entrance into the movie theater. He added patrons would be able to purchase tickets inside the theater. Next to this would be a separate entrance replacing the existing mall entrance. This entrance would allow customers to pass through the theater and into the mall. Mr. Pollack explained that the two restaurants with outside entries would have their own identities on the outside of the mall. Mr. Pollack explained that there is an underutilized commonarea of approxi y 20,0Q0 feet that will be converted into tenant space with the improvement. He said that there is a synergy existing between theaters and restaurants so placing them in close proximity is important On the restaurant side of the addition, there would be entrances into the restaurants, individual retail tenants, and two mall entrances one with an escalator down to the theater. Mayor Maetzold asked how people get from the main core of the shopping center to the bus terminal. Mr. Pollack said from the lower level, people would walk through an arcade and out through the movie theater. From the upper level, they would walk along the length of the theater to the bus shelter. Member Hovland asked if it was correct that in order to reach the bus shelter persons would walk outside, and if this would be different from the present situation, where they walk out �k directly from the mall to a covered bus shelter. Mr. Pollack acknowledged that there is a longer distance than exists today. Member Hovland asked if there was any plan to allow access to the bus shelter through the back area of the theater or on the west side. Mr. Pollack explained that was actually the truck tunnel and would be unsafe. Member Hovland asked how far a person would have to walk to reach the shelter. Mr. Pollack replied approximately 250 feet Member Kelly asked to address the developer. Richard Taylor, the O'Connor Group, one of the general partners who own the property said he serves as the asset manager responsible for Southdale. Member Kelly said it appears the proposal is almost as if an outlot was proposed for development While he would be willing to give up the 700 parking spaces, he needs to be convinced that it will increase traffic flow in the center and allow areas of Southdale that have been under -performing (Mervyns to Penneys and Penneys to Daytona) to grow their traffic. He warned that he could not support any further reductions in parking in the future after this addition. He asked how the proposed addition would increase the traffic to the Mervyn' and Pennies' corridors. Mr. Taylor responded that looking at sales per square foot, Southdale is in the top ten of the national regional malls. Penny's Court has 59,000 square feet that is about 50% occupied under permanent leases. Mervyns' Court on the lower level has about 30,000 square feet which is about 4056 occupied. As the owner analyzed the issues of the property, they looked ' at these two underutilized areas plus the third level food court, which had not performed as hoped. The owners attempted to find a theater operator who would put a two or three level theater into the Penneys' Court and were unsuccessful. Theater owners said their operations need to be a single level entity and the proposed location is the only one available. He added Page 5 W�t, Minutes/Edina City Councii/Navember 21 2000 Public.Comment David Farmer, 4612 Casco Avenue, asked if there had been any consideration of moving the mass transit location to an entirely different area from either its existing or proposed locations. Council Discussion/Action Member Kelly said he has spoken with many of the development team. He stated that his major concern is that the expansion is being sought to increase the mall's market value allowing Southdale to be flipped without looking to the long-term needs of the area. Member Kelly said he originally thought the. expansion, would be located nearer to J. C. Penny's and that the restaurants would be decentralized. He added that in his opinion, the development of virtually an outlot does nothing to improve traffic. Member Kelly stated further that the expansion solves a secondary problem at the cost of 700 parking spaces. He stated that future development cannot come at the cost of more parking. Member Kelly asked this be made a condition of approval for the current proposal. Member Hovland said he did not share all the concerns of Member Kelly. He acknowledged that having a theater anchoring a mall was a new concepts adding that he understood the synergy existing between theaters and restaurants. Member Hovland recognized the hard work of the ` 'development team, thanking them for the presentation. Member Hovland said he was all right P with the reduction in the parking, but was P � very concerned about affecting mass transit: He requested that the development approval be conditioned upon further design and approval of the transit hub and access to the bus shelter. Mass transit and bus ridership should be ' encouraged. Mayor Maetzold noted that he wished the changes were completed on France Avenue. However, he stated he liked the theater cohcept: Mayor Maetzold voiced concern about the east side of the property. He added he thought the developers had done a good job with traffic flow and parking, however, he shares Member HovIand's concern for the transit hub and does not want to see any negative impact on bus ridership. Mayor Maetzold does not want to see bus riders walking 280 feet outside to get to a bus shelter agreeing that a condition of approval should be further review of the mass transit portion of the project. Member Kelly questioned how many liquor licenses are still available in Edina. Mr. Hughes replied that eleven licenses are still available. Member Kelly expressed concern that the restaurants developed be of a caliber that would improve the mall. Gary Colliard responded that whale his firm is the theater developer, it is also a mixed-use land developer. They will be in the center for twenty years and have a fiduciary responsibility to make sure any restaurants are a good fit and that everyone's goal was to improve the traffic and viability of the Southdale Center. Member Hovland made a motion to close the public.hearing. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried ' Member Kell made a motion adopting opting Resolution No. 2000-123 granting final development plan approval conditioned upon: 1) location and design of transit hub must be approved by City Staff, 2) an easement allowing City transit vehicles the right to cross Center property, 3} a Page 7 � (q Cary Teague From: Tom Jenson Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 4:01 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Southdale Apartments Hi Cary, Here are my comments for the Southdale Apartments. 1. They are showing only one water supply to the property. More explanation is needed on how the fire sprinkler protection is going to work for 3 buildings and the parking levels. 2. I'm recommending separate water supplies coming from the new water main installed on the property to each building. The water supply for the 4 story apartment/townhouse should also supply the underground parking. 3. I'm recommending fire department connections (FDC) for each building. a. 10 story building located at the south end. b. 6 story building located at the south east corner. c. 4 story and parking garage located at the west exterior entrance to the stairway. 4. Fire hydrants shall be located on the inside of the road around the buildings so connecting to them does not obstruct fire department vehicles. a. One shall be located near the southeast corner of the 6 story building. b. One shall be located at the west exterior entrance to the stairway of the 4 story building. c. The one shown on C4.1 on the north end of the property can remain as shown. S. Fire lane signs will be required along the access road to the buildings. I will put a copy of this with my plan set with notes on it. Thanks, itThomas Jenson, Fire Marshal 952-826-03371 Fax 952-826-0393 TJensonQEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov/Fire Engineering Department - Phone 952-826-0371 Fax 952-826-0392 - www.CityofEdina.com Date: September 7, 2012 To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Wayne D. Houle — Director of Engineering Re: Review of Planning Submittal for Southdale Housing MEMO Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, MCES. O It appears that all storm water is treated on-site; provide all storm water calculations that indicate this. O A developer's agreement will be required for the revisions to 69th Street West — pedestrian crossing at easterly entrance and the westerly entrance into Southdale to include an eastbound left turn lane. Other items that need to be included are the public sidewalks along York Avenue and also along 69th Street West, and the intersection improvements at York Avenue and the entrance into Cub Foods. O All improvements along West 69th Street will need to meet Municipal State Aid standards and along York Avenue will need to meet County State Aid standards. O Provide sidewalk easement over all public sidewalks along York Avenue and 69th Street West. O Provide better pedestrian walkway between project and Southdale Center. Sheet C2.1 Site Plan: • Provide plans for the westerly entrance on 69th Street West into Southdale Center to include an eastbound left turn bay. • Provide plans for an enhanced pedestrian crossing through the median island between the easterly entrance of Southdale Center and Galleria to the south. The Promenade Crossing at Hazelton Road should be the template for the design of this pedestrian crossing. • Provide a "No U -Turn" sign in the westbound 69th Street West left turn bay at the Galleria entrance. This will prevent vehicles from exiting the right -out exit at the apartments and weaving across two through lanes to then go east bound on 69th Street West; the route to go eastbound would be to use the internal roadway system of Southdale Center to access York Avenue. • Provide an updated intersection detail for the intersection improvements at York Avenue and the entrance into Southdale / Cub Foods. The intersection improvements should include enhanced pedestrian crossings similar to what is being proposed on France Avenue at 66th Street West, 701h Street West, or 76th Street West. Engineering Department - 7450 Metro Blvd - Edina, MN 55439 Ajs� MEMO o e F .- • Eliminate boardwalk on sidewalk along York Avenue. The sidewalks along York Avenue and W Street West will become public sidewalks where the City will be maintaining these sidewalks. Provide 8 -ft wide sidewalks with a minimum of 8 -ft wide boulevards in these locations. • The attached turning radius indicates that an ambulance can maneuver through the tum -around. Sheet C4.1 Utility Plan: • Staff has analyzed both public utility systems to be certain that this development will not burden the public system. Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH) reviewed the existing water main system. SEH determined through the water main computer model that the existing water main has capacity to provide water service, irrigation, and fire flow protection to the 232 units while still maintaining the same level of protection to the City. Barr Engineering (BARR) reviewed the existing sanitary sewer system. The additional sanitary flow generated from the proposed 232 unit development was incorporated into the sanitary sewer model. BARR determined that there is sufficient capacity in the existing sanitary sewer lines to accommodate the proposed development. • There is a note below the Utility Notes that states the developer is analyzing a "Living Machine Sanitary Sewer System" in lieu of connecting into the sanitary sewer system. Staff does not recommend that this system be approved until staff can be reassured that the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services along with the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency approve such treatment. • Indicate on plan that all utilities shown are `Private". Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. G:\PW\ADMIN\COMM\EXTERNAL\GENERAL CORR BY STREETS\S Streets\Southdde Center\2012 Apartments\20120906 WH -Edina Review Souihdale Hou*Q.doc IP✓ C Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 BKV G R O U P Ardwftwe Mfdorpo* 122 Nwlh head Sbea Nlnmpe& m $101 Tdepham 612-339-3]52 Famb 612-339-6212 w—bkvgroup.aom VIN rr rrr�w,w e ax aaowrax EXISTING DRIVE LANE ///�� s0 DRIVER ) CONCRENCRE TC PLAT/DRY 0 / /ACUITY /— COIOR[0 PARK R RIME LAYOVER vh CONCRETE IIAT/DRY fIA[[ SITE KEY PLAN Transit Center Site Plan PROJECT NO.: 10017.005 Metro Iransit - 5outhdale Transit Center Edina Mlmewta SK. S Rio PARKING RAMI HALL �ENIRANCC PLATFORM 0 1f G EH "NM L SITE KEY PLAN Transit Center Site Plan PROJECT NO.: 10017.005 Metro Iransit - 5outhdale Transit Center Edina Mlmewta SK. S Rio Transit Center Illustrative Perspective Metro Transit - Southdale Transit Centersub �� Edina, lNnnmta xt6o Transit Center Illustrative Perspective tt LAP VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWEST • uowert6er. 2011 �� sxoisano.eiaoms Metro Transit - Southdale Transit Center 104MEwa. Minnesota mr Transit Center Itlustrative Perspective VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST � uzo„ Metro Transit - Southdale Transit Center EaI� � Sr e Alb a ---- - - --------- - - -- ...... .......•. Platform B Shelter Transit Center West Elevation SIOKAOr STRUETORt A SEATING TaSaIORNMAOE Da CIO"ERYOOAta STRUToREfOAi0rwa1. ORIOINAt SOTNAIE L17A38Uagit aUTT[RfLY ROOF 614C TRANSIT TAAat/i fMELTta xKoto ATVTO# wCN R f K�o-;, fRIOIUAL awT x m'3t Platform A Shelter Stormwater BioBasin (Typ) _-- Driver facility Park & Ride Platform/ Layover Transit Center East Elevation fAJECT110,romi� Metro Transit - Southdale Transit Center "Arooees _ EdIna. Minnesota SK. 9 A163 CELLPHONE CITY OF EDINA 2015 VENDOR Verizon Wireless 50.48 PD - SQUAD 0 ACCOUNT #942035382 BILLING DATE 11/01/15 952-737-9652 50.48 PD - SQUAD 2 ACCOUNT# AMOUNT DEPARTMENT 1400.6406 788.25 POLICE 5910.6188 31.05 PW - UTILITIES 5910.6188 100.96 PW 1470.6188 50.48 FIRE 970.74 had $150 credit for PW 952-737-9650 50.48 PD - SQUAD 0 952-737-9651 50.48 PD - SQUAD 1 952-737-9652 50.48 PD - SQUAD 2 952-737-9653 50.48 PD - SQUAD 3 952-737-9654 50.48 PD - SQUAD 4 952-737-9655 50.48 PD - SQUAD 5 952-737-9656 50.48 PD - SQUAD 6 952-737-9657 50.48 PD - SQUAD 7 952-737-9658 50.48 PD - SQUAD 8 952-737-9659 50.48 PD - SQUAD 9 952-737-9660 50.48 PD - K9 1 952-737-9661 31.05 PD - MIKE SEEGER 952-737-7012 50.48 PD - K9 2 952-737-9662 50.48 PD - TRAFFIC 2 952-737-9663 50.48 PD - TRAFFIC 3 952-737-9664 50.48 PD - TRAFFIC 4 952-873-9435 31.05 PW - SCADA Monitoring Phone 952-239-7352 50.48 PW - BRIAN OLSON 952-292-6898 50.48 PW -TIM BARNES 952-228-7181 50.48 FIRE - RESCUE 91 IPHONE 970.74 CITY OF EDINA 2015 VENDOR Verizon Wireless ACCOUNT #642016014 BILLING DATE 11/01/15 ACCOUNT # AMOUNT DEPARTMENT 5760.6188 35.01 CENTENNIAL LAKES 1260.6188 210.06 ENGINEERING 1160.6406 35.01 FINANCE 1470.6188 728.72 FIRE DEPARTMENT 1495.6188 350.10 INSPECTIONS 1554.6188 280.10 IT 1140.6188 35.01 PLANNING 1400.6160 910.34 POLICE 5910.6188 547.81 PUBLIC WORKS 44012.6710 35.01 PUBLIC WORKS - PARKING RAMP 1646.6188 70.02 PARK MAINTENANCE 1322.6185 35.01 PW - ELECTR $35.01 JSiems iPad 3,272.20 CLP 612-916-4972 $35.01 TSHIRLEY IPAD ENG 612-418-0634 $35.01 ENGLAPTOP2 CARD ENG 612-418-2362 $35.01 ENGLAPTOP1 CARD ENG 612-508-3394 $35.01 ENG - MMOHAMED DATA CARD ENG 612-709-0036 $35.01 ENGINEERING GETAC ENG 612-759-5525 $35.01 ENG - TRIMBLE GPS ENG 952-378-7968 $35.01 ENG - DNORTHENSCOLD DATA FD 612-246-0045 $35.01 ENGINE 81 MIFI FD 612-269-7757 $35.01 JSiems iPad FD 612-419-7154 $35.01 JStruzyk iPad FD 612-430-0563 $35.01 PCR1 W8 Getac FD 612-430-0564 $35.01 PCR2W8 Getac FD 612-430-0565 $35.01 PCR3W8 Getac FD 612-430-0566 $35.01 PCR4W8 Getac FD 612-430-0567 $35.01 FDMobile1 W8 Getac FD 612-437-3801 $35.01 FDMobile3W8 Getac FD 612-437-8098 $35.01 FDMobile4W8 Getac FD 612-704-1384 $35.01 PCR1W8 FD 612-704-1386 $35.01 FDR91W8Internal FD 612-704-1387 $35.03 PCR4W8 FD 612-704-5432 $63.51 FDE81 W8 Internal FD 952-378-0851 $35.01 DTodd iPad FD 952-437-8707 $35.01 FDMobile5W8 Getac FD 952-463-7335 $35.01 10Essig iPad FD 952-567-1276 $35.01 PCR1 MIFI FD 952-737-9068 $35.01 TSchmitz iPad FD 952-999-0885 $35.01 FIRE GETAC 1 CAD FIN 612-749-7160 $35.01 FINANCE MIFI INSP 612-248-4556 $35.01 JHall iPad INSP 612-269-0692 $35.01 TEisert iPad INSP 612-269-1364 $35.01 Inspector iPad INSP 612-269-2536 $35.01 GBomsta iPad INSP 612-280-8252 $35.01 SKartak iPad INSP 612-419-4873 $35.01 TNelson iPad INSP 612-708-5723 $35.01 DFisher iPad INSP 612-834-8567 $35.01 Inspections iPad INSP 952-378-0395 $35.01 MRice iPad INSP 952-807-6369 $35.01 DMickelson iPad IT 952-228-7886 $35.01 PD MIFI IT 952-228-7897 $35.01 PD MIFI Page 1 of 2 IT 952-240-6033 $35.01 RYAN BROWNING DATA IT 952-463-7952 $35.01 RBROWNING MIFI IT 952-463-8039 $35.01 Nick IT Spare MiFi IT 952-463-8934 $35.01 SPARE MIFI IT 952-491-1522 $35.03 IT ON SHELF IT 952-491-3795 $35.01 IT ON SHELF PD 612-214-1941 $35.01 SQUAD 243 MIFI PD 612-214-8546 $35.01 SQUAD 111 MIFI PD 612-246-0483 $35.03 SQUAD 236 MIFI PD 612-248-9719 $35.01 PD - RESERVE/ACO/CSO MIFI PD 612-400-4446 $35.01 PD - RESERVE/ACO/CSO MIFI PD 612-437-0723 $35.01 PD - MOBILE PRO TRAILER PD 612-437-8751 $35.01 PD SQUAD MIFI PD 612-655-4167 $35.01 DWI GETAC INTERNAL PD 612-704-1385 $35.01 MOTORCYCLE GETAC INTERNAL PD 612-716-5892 $35.01 PD - ADAM L'HEUREUX PD 612-834-9764 $35.01 PD - RESERVE/ACO/CSO MIFI PD 952-228-7873 $35.01 PD MIFI PD 952-237-7604 $35.01 4G LTE MIFI PD 952-288-3484 $35.05 SQUAD T3 191 MIFI PD 952-288-5372 $35.01 SQUAD 245 MIFI PD 952-288-5397 $35.01 SQUAD 232 MIFI PD 952-288-5767 $35.01 SQUAD 248 MIFI PD 952-288-5909 $35.01 SQUAD 114 MIFI PD 952-412-5619 $35.01 Police Invest 2 PD 952-463-5234 $35.01 HP ELITEBOOK PD 952-463-8225 $35.01 DLINDMAN MIFI PD 952-463-8888 $35.01 SQUAD 290 MIFI PD 952-491-1956 $35.01 SQUAD K92 MIFI PD 952-491-3851 $35.01 SQUAD 9 MIFI PD 952-491-3962 $35.03 SQUAD 7 MIFI PD 952-567-1935 $35.01 SQUAD T14 MIFI PLAN 952-240-6527 $35.01 PLANNING - CINDY LARSON IPAD PM 612-210-6528 $35.01 Park Maint iPad 1 PM 612-709-4760 $35.01 Park Maint iPad 2 PW 612-202-2540 $35.01 PWTOUGHPAD1 INTERNAL PW 612-247-9920 $35.01 BOLSON IPAD PW 612-418-9955 $35.01 PWTOUGHPAD2INTERNAL PW 612-430-0568 $35.01 PWFIELD4W8 Toughpad PW 612-430-0569 $35.01 PWFIELD3W8 Toughpad PW 612-430-5027 $35.01 PW TRIMBLE PW 612-716-4292 $35.01 PWFIELD4W8 Toughpad PW 612-716-8896 $35.01 PWFIELD3W8 Toughpad PW 612-760-9178 $40.67 PW CAMERA TRUCK MIFI PW 612-834-7448 $40.67 PWMOBILE8W8 Toughpad PW 612-834-8367 $40.67 PWMOBILE8W9 Toughpad PW 612-834-8764 $40.67 PWMOBILE8W7 Toughpad PW 952-300-7160 $35.01 PW GPS MiFi PW 952-412-2417 $35.01 PW - Meter Reading Laptop PW 952-412-6949 $35.03 PW - Utility Locate Laptop PW -2 952-387-0476 $35.01 50TH PARKING RAMP MIFI PW - ELECTR 19524U4944 1 $35.01 PW - Bob Steinmetz Laptop 3,272.20 Page 2 of 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Kris Aaker September 12, 2012 B-12-10 Assistant Planner Recommended Action: Approve the variance as requested. Project Description A 2.4 foot south side yard setback variance at 7312 Wooddale Ave. So. to increase the ridge height of the roof above the garage to accommodate living space 10 feet from the side lot line for property owners Jim and Crissy Field. INFORMATIOWBACKGROUND The subject property is located on the west side of Wooddale Ave. So. consisting of a land'/: story home with an attached two car garage. The property owners would like to expand the second floor to Include bedroom area over the garage. The existing garage is located 9 feet from the south lot line. Currently there is attic area above the garage, however, it is not easily convertible to living space given the low roofline. The homeowners are proposing to increase the roof height 10 20 feet in order to accommodate headroom for bedroom area and provide a roof pitch that can accommodate proper insulation and avoid ice dams. The building footprint is not increasing with all improvements contained on the second floor. See attached site location, photos, survey and site plan for details. The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 10 foot side yard setback for living space, however, six inches of setback must be added for each twelve inches the side wall height exceeds 15 feet. Originally the plan was to maintain the existing roofline and to simply add living space beneath, however, the current roof pitch is so low that problems are created relating to heating and cooling and the ability to properly insulate, causing the potential for ice dams In the winter. The homeowner also believes the steeper roof pitch is more attractive and would complement the neighborhood. The existing side wall of the garage is located 9.0 — 9.4 feet from the side lot line. The new roof line would be in -set by one foot and provide a setback of 10.1-14.4 feet from the side lot line. The second floor side wall will be farther from the side yard than the existing garage side wall. The neighboring house adjacent to the expansion area is a two story home. Spacing between structures will remain the same at 24 feet between the two homes. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single -dwelling homes. Easterly: Single -dwelling homes. Southerly: Single -dwelling homes. Westerly: Single -dwelling homes Existing Site Features The subject property is 11,610 square feet in area. The existing home was built in 1960. Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Building Design The proposal is to construct. Compliance Table Single-family detached R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District variance Required 2 City Standard Proposed Front - 34.8 feet 36.1 feet Side- 10+ height *10 feet Rear- 25 feet 74 feet Building Height 2'l stories 1112 stories, 30 feet to midpoint 35 feet to 19 feet to midpoint, ridge, 22 feet to the ridge Lot coverage 25% 18.6% variance Required 2 Primary Issues e Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit Zoning District and complies with all requirements with the exception of second floor side yard setback. 2. The home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property and not detract from neighborhood. The footprint of the home would remain the same. 3. The improvements will provide a reasonable use of the site and improve on the existing conditions. Spacing between the proponent's and neighboring structures will remain the same. 4. The home improvement and height increase would provide enough space to accomplish the bedroom while allowing for proper insulation and ice dam protection. Is the proposed variance justified? Yes. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Section 850.0.Subd., requires the following findings for approval of a variance: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The existing roof pitch is lower and flatter than proposed, potentially causing future leaking due to insufficient insulation and room for ventilation. The inability to avoid a potential roof failure is a practical difficulty for the homeowner in the future. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The unique circumstance is the inability to increase the roof height to provide proper insulation and weather protection while maintaining the existing footprint. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The footprint of the home will remain the same and spacing between structures will remain the same. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the Planning Commission approve the variance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance requested side yard setback variance, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it slightly alters existing conditions without reducing setback or impacting the surrounding neighbors. b. The imposed setback and existing house location does not provide opportunity for an increase in roof pitch for weather protection and ceiling height in the existing attic space. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 4 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained In substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Survey date stamped: June 6, 2012. Building plans/ elevations date stamped: August 16, 2012. Deadline for a city decision: October 27, 2011. 5 LOGJSMap Output Page Page I of 2 Property AssesMng littp:llgis.logis.orgILO(IIS—Ai,cIMSlinis?ServiceNatnc=ed—LOGISMap_OVSDE&ClientVe,., 9/612012 Site Location 4 41S arm" Nfr 4M 4M 4m:!Erift lY7rt 4507 L atlt �JMJM AN $ ft too 450 rill j? M Labols 4011 401 +s1J 4141 Arm 9 ts I&MINsmes"bals w4011 o F".. 4119 ,/ CAI, umm "V Cftas A*l 07/7 IN4 147P IS YM I'm roomR17 t. & parmts 771AI - 20 NM 4107 am of 727y ral 17 R 4041 #M4 ms Mr NMI »X nu Im Pitt tial net 71W 1304 1 AJSt $10 77aa 7#n fill Pi I Lary A MIS — 012 tiM "13 .0420 Fair fin .tar atm dris 4m F7AJ i 4afa OP 403F lkLlrtul 77H 4w 4m 4m mm aid 7j" to" 4003in 4210 Folds Is 0 44" 4M ,lad NN 4Ma 46" 41100 an 4115 45 I i�� Wil ?495 017 4FIS ?4wk Ym -1 'M I �M 4m 4041 4=1 4WI H Mr Aln NO 1i+NMti 744! 4101 M14 mr ,4130 Mp 4417J15 w" 45" 4501 SM VIAN 4490 41.11 PID.3102824240082 A, 7312 Wooddale Ave Edina, MN 55435 W Property AssesMng littp:llgis.logis.orgILO(IIS—Ai,cIMSlinis?ServiceNatnc=ed—LOGISMap_OVSDE&ClientVe,., 9/612012 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of l littp.Ilgis.logis.orgALOOIS_ArclMS/iins?ServiceNanie=ed LOGISMap_UVSUE&ClientVc... 41612012 LOGISMap Output Page Page I of I http:llgis.logis.org/l..OGIS_ArclMSliins?Service? ane=edLOGISMaj) OVSDE&ClientVe... 9/6/2012 Page 1 of 1 132 Li/oo�e,�� file://ed-ntl/city%,ide/PDSI ages/Photos/3102824240082001;jpg 9/6/2012 r 4 e s a- _^ '4 t"M?.: i,� Page Iofl file:/led-ntl /citywidelPDSImages/Photos/310282424008300 t ;jpg 9/6/2012