HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-09-11 Planning Commission Meeting PacketsAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA -
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
SEPTEMBER 11, 2013
7:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
IV.. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Planning Commission August 28, 2013
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT
During "Community Comment," the Planning Commission will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that
haven't been considered In the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't slated for future consideration.
Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same
issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may
not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair'or Commission Members to
respond to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a
future meeting.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Variance. Casey Holley. 5616 Woodcrest Drive, Edina, MN.
B. Preliminary Plat. Scott Busyn. 6609 Blackfoot Pass, Edina, MN
C. Preliminary Plat. John Adams on behalf of Ted E. Warner. #5 Merilane, Edina, MN
D. Preliminary Plat. Ridge Creek. 5820 Brookview Avenue. Continued to September 25, 2013
VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Lot Division — 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive/Interlachen Country Club
VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
• Council Connection
• Attendance
IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
X. STAFF COMMENTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the
way of hearing amplification, an Interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172
hours in advance of the meeting. Next Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, September 25, 2013
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Originator
Meeting Date
Agenda #
Kris Aaker
September 11, 2013
B-13-17
Assistant Planner
Recommended Action: Approve the variance as requested.
Project Description
A 27 foot setback variance from a pond at 6616 Woodcrest Drive to
increase the ridge height of the roof on the back side of the home for a
second floor addition to accommodate bedroom space at the same 23 foot
setback from the pond in the rear yard as the existing home for property
owner Casey Holley.
INFORMATION/BACKGROUND
The subject property is located on the west side of Woodcrest Drive
consisting of a 2 story walk -out home with an attached two car garage, (see
attachments A.1— A.5, site location, Ariel photos). The home backs up to a pond
and provides a 23 foot setback from the water body. The zoning ordinance
requires a minimum 50 foot setback from naturally occurring lakes, ponds and
streams. The existing home is nonconforming and is 27 feet into the required
setback. Over three fourths of the home is within the nonconforming pond
setback, (see attached survey A.6 and A16.).
The property owners would like to expand the second floor to include two new
Bedrooms. The second floor addition will match the existing nonconforming
setback of the back wall of the home. There is no opportunity for a first floor
expansion due to lot coverage requirements and the living room on the front side
of the home has a vaulted ceiling and is not conducive to a second floor
expansion, (see attached photos, floor plans and elevations, attachments: A.6 —
A.23).
The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 50 foot setback for structures near a
pond. The ordinance has been amended as required by the Department of
Natural resources over the years with increased setbacks required from all water
bodies, regardless of where the existing structure is located. The City of Edina
retains the authority to process variances from water body setbacks.
The proposed second story addition complies with all of the setback and height
requirements with the exception of the existing nonconforming setback from the
pond. The only opportunity for expansion of the home is to the second floor.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly:
Single -dwelling homes.
Easterly:
Single -dwelling homes.
Southerly:
Single -dwelling homes.
Westerly:
Pond/Single-dwelling homes
Existing Site Features
The subject property is 13, 338 square feet in area. The existing home was
built in 1969.
Planning
Guide Plan designation:
Zoning:
Building Design
The proposal is to construct.
Compliance Table
Single-family detached
R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District
* Variance Required
2
City Standard
Proposed-
ro osedFront
Front-
30.58 feet
30.68 feet
Side-
10+ height
13.69
Rear—
25 feet
75 feet
Pond
50 feet
*23 feet
Building Height
2'/2 stories
2 stories,
30 feet to midpoint 35 feet to
19 feet to midpoint,
ridge,
20 feet to the ridge
Lot coverage
25%
32.6%
* Variance Required
2
Primary Issues
Is the proposed development reasonable for this site?
Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons:
1. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit Zoning
District and complies with all requirements with the exception of
second floor setback from the pond. The addition will match the
existing nonconforming setback to the pond.
2. The addition is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the
improvements will enhance the property and not detract from
neighborhood. The footprint of the home will not increase.
3. The improvements will provide a reasonable use of the site and improve
on the existing conditions. Spacing between the proponent's and
neighboring structures will remain the same.
4. The home improvement and height increase would provide enough
space to accomplish bedroom areas without having to completely
reconfigure the property, (no tear-down/re-build).
Is the proposed variance justified?
Yes. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is
found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties
in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As
demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance
standards, when applying the three conditions:
Section 850.0.Subd., requires the following findings for approval of a
variance:
Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions
must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will:
9) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from
complying with ordinance requirements.
Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land
cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the
applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with
the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties"
may include functional and aesthetic concerns.
Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. A practical difficulty is
the original placement of the home and setback from the pond. The
current setback requirement from the pond creates an unbuildable lot.
2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not
common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-
created?
Yes. The unique circumstance is the inability to increase the roof height to
provide living space. An addition to the back of the home with a matching
setback is the least intrusive solution to add onto the home. The change in
pond setback is not a self-created.
3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood?
No. The proposed improvements will not alter the essential character of
the neighborhood. The footprint of the home will remain the same and
spacing between structures will remain the same. The addition will be
recessed from the front wall of the garage to reduce impact from the
street -The addition conforms to all of the zoning ordinances requirements
with the exception of the required setback from the pond.
Staff Recommendation
Recommend that the Planning Commission approve the variance.
Approval is based on the following findings:
1) With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the
required standards and ordinances for the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit
District.
2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because:
a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it slightly alters
existing conditions without reducing setback or impacting the
surrounding neighbors.
4
b. The imposed setback and existing house location do not provide
opportunity for an increase in second floor area
C. The original placement of the home closer to the pond than
currently allowed prohibits expansion on the second floor without
the benefit of a variance
Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions:
1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in
substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the
conditions below:
Survey date stamped: August 23, 2013.
Building plans/ elevations date stamped: August 23, 2013.
Deadline for a city decision: October 23, 2013
VARIANCE APPLICATION
CASE NUMBER DATE
FEE PAID
City of Edina Planning Department * www.cityofedina.com
480'1 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 826-0369
fax (952) 826-0389
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEE: . RES -$350.00 NON -RES - $600.00
APPLICANT:
NAME: GaSe�c r -�-�c►��'e�j (Signature required on back page)
ADDRESS: PHONE: G�12• �SZ)�2-j
EMAIL: C_4z.S -1 ke(,v cawM
PROPERTY OWNER:
NAME: CZM5: ,J -w N (Signature required on back page)
ADDRESS: t400JGr a,`k bNtue- PHONE: ('-Iz' 32s2. 121
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (written and electro
7 tz 1 1 -n_ /k t /+ . 1 n
*'You must provide a full legal descrlption. If more space is needed, please use a separate sheet.
Note: The County may not accept the resolution approving your project if the legal description does not match their
records. This may delay your project.
PROPERTY ADDRESS: W.004C--VtR t �Y'IuQ
PRESENT ZONING: P.I.D.# I HOZ 824 1
EXPLANATION OF�RIEQUEST: 1 �I �+.i� ) . _L , ,1
�arIAytce 1 Ne. JOSS Ik f -A the_ 0K W e�e lk� i loh o -The- rVeAv- �9
�701n� 10 9 Sc�nS`F ZSory addr'{tart ah a polr-%torn Che exLsiir��-�•v'r�
(Use reverse s de or additiorial pages if necessa y) `JJ
ARCHITECT: NAME: 15ktA Arc�t PHONE: BIZ• 7�7•`H�
EMAIL: "Irk Sa.10(grC , C-OOA
SURVEYOR: NAME: titee lrt PHONE: iSZ. f32.5000
EMAIL: J d �v`tm. COW
Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions
must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using
additional sheets of paper as necessary.
The Proposed Variance will:
YES NO
Relieve practical difficulties in complying ❑
with the zoning ordinance and that the use ��1 i
is reasonable `j"wo`j iv s e -ext tN kbme- 1«s WIL-Ki 4Q -5c) 'SA
les{V4N ov��e.( c,, �o(�f �c�►.� o �}{►e q�cva 't�►e_ Va�c�ecI (;V -($A I-0,0" Com` 11 9S
'"f es o►JiCC- qv e" "e) -v a(-- Go Wel b( iW a K-- e 4 Z wv� d�i+= .
Correct extraordinary circumstances /
applicable to this :property but not
applicable to other property in the vicinity
or zoning district y� f �J
�c. SN�g �[ huvhpQv i P�C.4S1 LK°r Y1aw��S Lot +r1/ ❑
G 4Sc �V%C7K I M (e-t:i �. i 4s �ZSe� ea et spm ( .i
bac t� ui oNd �lvq a oirci i Ha .set 6a 1p
[d►+i G1.�-- ! a� �ev' �`f'tes th`�ls h� h�o✓��. I
9 � �
Be in harmony with the general purposes
and intent of the zoning ordinance
`["�le. �raPos� 2� c�� l q e�dci�'io� Co►n�.l�l tis
wi`}�, aI[ `�'v,`t side- r�lr NaN�[ sell -b4 -s ❑
as wed( as -�,e- 30' heS.i/hi- I(i P%t+;a-F;0,A
a,hc( 'top-5�oq-pv,t.,* -of i4e- trams,--,
Not alter the essential Character of a
neighborhood
Stool 6me-s�."J�1 s i'4�t�laoV`hc��jjoA . 1 �►e_ �t�d���
w,« tv k+ l �e- X044 4 bq-fr� ot N ld b `T�le- exc�t M
Gt.S WeAI WN1
be t^60 tM
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT
This application should be processed in my name, and I am the party whom the City should
contact about this application. By signing this application, I certify that all fees, charges, utility
bills, taxes, special assessments and other debts or obligations due to the City by me or for this
property have been paid. I further certify that i am in compliance with all ordinance requirements
and conditions regarding other City approvals that have been granted to me for any matter.
I have completed all of the applicable filing requirements and, to the best of my knowledge, the
documents and information I have submitted are true and correct.
I &' t3
Applicant's Signature
OWNER'S STATEMENT
I am the fee title owner of the above described property, and I agree to this application.
(If a corporation or partnership is the fee title holder, attach a resolution authorizing this
application on behalf of the board of directors or partnership.)
Owner's Signature
Date
(O. U
Date
Note. Bath signatures are required (if the owner is different than the applicano before we
can process the application, otherwise it is considerer red incomplete,
Loc&w� Ma P
August 27, 2013 1:1,134
0 0.0125 0.025 0.05 mi
Fame a i i r 0 0 1
Streets 0 0,02 0.04 0.00 km
Addresses
Parcels
Lakes
Parks
OLO015 2013
w
5601•
561134'
x 4406
w
a5605
.
i` f: ,.
I
Ixv.a
�
;' h.'' ij $605 ,...
$404 p
l
8615'
p
ar.r
5612
a h, -v
J-
: • `xaad 'JF,
I
!
r
r '..
560
560
x
,r`
1
f'a:Y...
_
°4t1t"PAM
5614
., .. .._...,
;
F
30
y
•
s,
r
Iu wsrstc
0
�
• rax *,
n
4
�� � S 5615 '6 �
, ti
$610
'. jrr
�1 451x �`
.. -`ail
jr"
��b.. �♦1
\
I
r qax,.
-
$617 3
{1m;
5616
,
5664
J
I
�
n
,,• ,r
•s62o .. 5621 r
v�aa♦ � ♦
$660
,. tt
• max .
7i
6424 5629
R j
5656
,.
etx
� �
0,61rrrr
,
r,
•. -
� ,•, best
_---"
f
_ �_
~ u
•
„
�
: la
P' 15$36 7 f 5431
5452
a"
5646
•
8 5640
l.,,
�
�� `,
,♦`'-rre4
�
174 zvS+ r r•y� •
r
'G
4.1
5633
•
\
� 5657
•o
IT____M�
��. _. _.—
� Im � _
_ s.;s/ ,t \,s
n
506.3,E
5645
5$45
,aat 5541
$ tC
August 27, 2013 1:1,134
0 0.0125 0.025 0.05 mi
Fame a i i r 0 0 1
Streets 0 0,02 0.04 0.00 km
Addresses
Parcels
Lakes
Parks
OLO015 2013
Interac a Property
Maps
Map
5600 ( 5601
5712
4020
4024
3936139321392813924
m
_
5600
5601
24?' 73
76
5604
f I
5ws 5600
Oa
5604
77
3
`�
5601 ��bY/�s�..
%06
5611
k 1
( 5808 ;5605 �
�`
8D
5512
9 5604
-' 560581
t,
82
96
5612 5609'85
29
30
....
-
� � 92
27 �
5616 �
24
�
s
5610 5615 .
�-
88
"
tl
84
Y,
r
28
5617
5664 516
5660
5621
. 91
8601/1
24
4
5620 ,
�
t 89
26
' 5e4
k X29
i
1
5632
22
5665
d" i� .,
5648 5640
5631
��
5704 5705
5652 5636
a�
\
�n5708
5712
4020
4024
3936139321392813924
m
Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 1
X 3 46295000147,4971931.... 9/4/2013
i "¢ 44 Y
Ar A ' .f
i ith `w dP,4 Li 3 31. tF
-
._:illi
p �5
r
•
u
m.�+,,l �� j xU d
;boa
_� °' 4 � ♦ a ,
z � i �
r.
9 T,y yr
vh ♦�0�9�a it �+<
I
�
4 i
.y v
Ey {.L �' � 7S'•
Oro
ry
�
�r
' is `� `
J •
fst,�
�fa4
♦q�
b
Y
s"
t
J
G
�$^ ¢�$�Q�C
1 � �,i�.
Y V. •r "3 L` 5+ � aT O 6 9' fl 't^°�
{
ail"
PROJECT NO. 157M.00 EXISTING CONDITIONS ASBUILT SURVEY
PREPARED FOR: IV I141 D 30DO
QWISSA HOLLEY
OoDA DENOTES E)=NG ELEVATION - o
(000:0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION S o
-.�--- INDICATES DIRECTION OF�`
�+ N
SURFACE DRAINAGE
8G9 82 = GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION
E67.32 = 1ST FLOOR ELEVATION b8
LLOT ARA 'Aim POGO B W Sari s 8 5QFT`"� � OO
TOTAL AREAS: 2701 SM 00 C, V,
TOTAL LAT A
TOTAL COVERACE ABOVE POND -32.6X
S%9•Jr� � •o � � • �\
ADDREM 5616 WOODCREST DrdVE
BENOHMARIt iq�� .� ` �' •� 1 , kA
MAT LOTS MS. MM 2 +�`\`\ \ o T3 Oe-_
ELEV. + 865.57, ,p '�\ ♦ CJ lS 2 6 \ �O
11 N
Tr
`-.: `l am\\• + •Q 4 1' 9- ,+ ., �cP V
POND
{�
;0 NWL=857.0a
0A I1WL=859.9 +
E LOT 7 t oz's ���
SCALE : t" '
Legal Description:
LOT 7. BLOCK 3,
COLONIAL GROVE SIXTH ADDITION, `�w,�'�
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA. ..
y. I hereby eaNfy thot ihle to o hue and aameot ta4lon
mW CONSUUM D -••�.� ' me thle 22M ay of A LY, 2M& d heroan. As by
gxparod
ROBE ru %mm ped LAWMMM��fiQ
C M ING INC. (' ' P. - Mirm. Res}. No. 19086
09.1/
,�2 r
b'
�t 3$
F
�
A#
alC
a•Y
woo.v
r
V �
,rte �ti
,�2 r
b'
�t 3$
alC
Y
R`.
r,
l!P 1 J'
SY
t�
c�
!� � ,4' ✓ dry y Ye$ ,,.!'
l!P 1 J'
SY
t�
c�
a
67,1 'sy
4s i1
4, i1�2
iy'f '�
f
14
r!
f
14
Ma E Ad
a 3 c�9 mis zm 13
0
..111..,.,1
MINNEAPOLIS
]l6 ENpp b. FT00
T[i: 161I1>•t•
FAX (SiT13>9-0001
STILLWATEY
LO 4�
Sheet +
No.
El
fT1llMFilR
mw
LOWER LEVEL PLAN
fersw . m
No,
co
e 42- 39 fill. 'YHV g z
3 sE-152 �XRi�? 1 S=i�l�dooj� �I�S1 eJ �a
..
�
_
h 933 a Z
1140
,015
-s a a4�: J IY rd
g O# O N n1 t O
F< Y33 a n` ❑ O H Z
y cr#1 DVA __
m
X, Z%
ii
ILL!:::]
6rcMiNNEA PPIOLiS
3 6Nn Pe4t MNiS�atim
TEL:16131119.MJ>
FAX 16131 J39LW1
STIIIWAT FR
N
A4
a
I
��1zo�os� p
1 UPPER LEVEL PLAN
suLe ur . 1vr
vq
fiu .I i • lJi3,
Sheet
No.
tv,d 3
® ❑ '933 n` a 0 O N Z
X, Z3
N
VY
S
-44A5. -Hi�Y IAv`
0
X' Z
r
1'M
N[]
V�
33d
a*
a
O�
uLi Z
N
VY
S
-44A5. -Hi�Y IAv`
0
X' Z
r
Jackie Hoogenakker
From: Bill Belknap <bill.belknap@me.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 9:45 PM
To: Jackie Hoogenakker
Subject: Case file B-13-17 -- Setback variance @ 5616 Woodcrest Drive
As a neighboring homeowner (my wife and I live two doors down from the property in question), I'm simply writing to
express our support of the proposed addition to the Holly residence at 5616 Woodcrest Drive. Thanks for inviting our
input.
Bill Belknap
5624 Woodcrest Drive
Edina, MN. 55424
Sent from my iPad
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Originator
Meeting Date
Agenda #
Cary Teague
September 11, 2013
VI.B
Director of Planning
INFORMATION & BACKGROUND
Project Description
Great Neighborhood Homes Inc. on behalf of Douglas Johnson is proposing to
subdivide the property at 6609 Blackfoot Pass into two lots. (See property
location on pages Al—A3.) The existing home would be torn down, and two new
homes built on the new lots. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4—
A16.) The new home on Lot 1 would be located generally where the existing
home is located. The home on Lot 2, would be located toward the street in an
area away from the adjacent home to the south, to avoid large Oak trees and
some of the steeper slopes on the site. (See page A14.)
To accommodate the request the following is required:
1. A subdivision;
2. Front yard setback variance from 100 feet to 45 feet for proposed Lot
2.
Both lots would gain access off Blackfoot Pass. Within this neighborhood, the
median lot area is 27,131 square feet, median lot depth is 183 feet, and the
median lot width is 146 feet. (See attached median calculations on page Al 6.)
The new lots would meet the median width, depth, and lot size requirements. A
new home could be built on Lot 2 without the need for a variance, however, in
doing so some of the best trees on the site would be removed (large Oak trees);
more slopes would be disturbed, and the home would be located much closer to
the existing home at 6705 Cheyenne Trail. (See page A.)
Surrounding Land Uses
The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low-
density residential.
Existing Site Features
The existing site contains a single-family home and attached garage. This lot
is larger than most in the neighborhood, contains slopes with mature trees.
(See pages Al, A2 and Al 1.)
Planning
Guide Plan designation:
Zoning:
Lot Dimensions
Single -dwelling residential
R-1, Single -dwelling district
As demonstrated above, the proposed subdivision would meet all minimum
lot size requirements.
Grading/Drainage and Utilities
Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house would be
reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, garage
or driveway would have to be directed to Blackfoot Pass and Cheyenne Trail.
Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook-up locations would
be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District permit would also be required.
Primary Issue
• Is the proposed Plat with a front Yard Setback Variance reasonable for
this site?
Yes. Staff believes that the proposed Plat with the front yard setback variance
for Lot 2 is reasonable for the site for the following reasons:
1. Both of the proposed lots meet the City of Edina's minimum lot size
requirements. (See above table.)
2
Area
Lot Width
Depth
REQUIRED
27,131 s.f.
146 feet
183 feet
Lot 1
46,473s.f.
153 feet
268 feet
Lot 2
30,920 s.f.
150 feet
323 feet
As demonstrated above, the proposed subdivision would meet all minimum
lot size requirements.
Grading/Drainage and Utilities
Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house would be
reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, garage
or driveway would have to be directed to Blackfoot Pass and Cheyenne Trail.
Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook-up locations would
be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District permit would also be required.
Primary Issue
• Is the proposed Plat with a front Yard Setback Variance reasonable for
this site?
Yes. Staff believes that the proposed Plat with the front yard setback variance
for Lot 2 is reasonable for the site for the following reasons:
1. Both of the proposed lots meet the City of Edina's minimum lot size
requirements. (See above table.)
2
2. Building pads have been located on the site to cause the least amount of
impact on the sites mature trees and slopes. (See page A14.)
3. The proposed building pad for Lot 2 would be located further away from
the existing home at 6705 Cheyenne Trail, than would a code compliant
home. (See pages Al4—A15.)
4. The findings for a variance for the building pad for Lot 2 would be met.
Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted
unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause
practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the
use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal
meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions:
a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a
reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements?
Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the
land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather,
the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying
with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical
difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns.
The practical difficulty is caused by the existing high quality mature
Oak trees and slopes located in the area where a code compliant
building pad would be. (See pages A14—A15.) In addition, if a home
were constructed in the code compliant building pad area, it would be
located closer to the home at 6705 Cheyenne Trail. By moving the
home on Lot 2 up closer to the street, it would not only preserve the
mature Oaks and slopes, but also the vegetation that provides a
natural screen between the two properties. (See page A14.) Staff
would recommend requiring a conservation easement over the slope
and Oak trees that are to be preserved to permanently preserve those
resources.
b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not
common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-
created?
The circumstances of the mature trees, slopes and proximity of the
adjacent home to the south are not created by the applicant and are
generally unique in the R-1 District.
Additionally, there is an extra area of green space within the right-of-
way of Cheyenne Trail. This area is between 18-20 feet, which from
the street would give the appearance of a greater front yard setback. A
typical green space within the right-of-way is between 5-8 feet.
Therefore, the home would be set 65 feet back from the edge of the
paved roadway. (See page A14.)
c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood?
No. The proposed building Location at 45 feet from Blackfoot Pass and
Cheyenne Trail would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The
home at 6621 Cheyenne Trail has a front yard setback of 42 feet and
6624 Cheyenne Trail has a front yard setback of 45 feet. (See page
Ala and A2.)
The applicant is also agreeable to not construct a home to maximize
the height allowed by code. He would limit the total building height to
35 feet, when the code would allow a home to be 40 feet tall to the
ridge line of the home.
Staff Recommendation
Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of
6609 Blackfoot Pass with a Front Yard Setback variance for Lot 2 from 100 feet
to 45 feet from Blackfoot Pass and Cheyenne Trail. Approval is based on the
following findings:
1. The proposed Plat meets all required standards and ordinances for a
subdivision.
2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width and
depth and area.
3. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because:
a. The practical difficult unique to the property is caused by the large
mature Oak trees and slopes on the east half of Lot 2 where a code
compliant building pad would be located. These are natural
conditions, not caused by property owner.
b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the
immediate neighborhood. There are two homes with similar front
yard setbacks at 6621 and 6624 Cheyenne Trail.
4
C. There is 18-20 feet of green space in the right-of-way of Cheyenne
Trail, which would result in a 65 -foot setback from the edge of the
paved roadway.
d. The variance results in the saving of mature Oak trees, protection
of slopes, and moves the home further away from the existing
home at 6705 Cheyenne Trail.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval
or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary
approval will be void.
2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be
submitted:
a. If required, submit evidence of Nine Mile Watershed District
approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to
meet the district's requirements.
b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina Engineering
department.
C. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer.
d. Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house would
be reviewed at the time of building permit, and shall be subject to
review and approval of the city engineer. Drainage from any new
home, garage or driveway would have to be directed to the street.
3. Any new home on Lot 2 would be limited to a ridge line height of 35 feet.
4. A 10 -foot conservation easement must be established along the lot lines
to preserve the vegetation areas along the streets and along the north and
south lot lines.
5. A slope and tree conservation easement must be placed over the large
Oak trees and slope areas to be preserved by moving the home toward
the street.
Deadline for a City Decision: November 4, 2013
Intero ' Property
" Ma" L A Map
rt"
uj
_. xV t BAL ER t zl
T
i
f Io
_i
T"
a
a E�2 > I
oda` ',,fi.!tBgMSCff J f
4Kr
n Ml
Y
g t�
4 � mi %i�� zA
,
Parcel 06-116-21-42-0010 Map Scale: V = 400 ft. N
ID: Print Date: 9/5/2013
Parcel 6609 Blackfoot Pass
Address: Edina, MN 55439
Property Residential
Type:
This map Is a compilation of data trom various
sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no
Home-
or or
m
Hoestead
stead:
plied including fitnesssentation
mn particular
purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and
completeness of the information shown.
Parcel 1.76 acres
Sale
COPYRIGHT HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013
Area: 76,652 Sq ft
Code:
Bink Grecol
6904
6624
Parcel 06-116-21-42-0010 j
Owner i
Name: D L Johnson Etal [
Parcel 6609 Blackfoot Pass
Address: Edina, MN 55439
Property Residential
Type:
Home- Homestead
stead:
Parcel 1.76 acres
Area: 76,652 sq ft
4k
6624 6628 6632 t,
6212 i
i 6208 6204 ,' 3
161 Al 6200 ##
t
r4t8 w
i215 62091 6205 If
t,r
6201'
s
ff I
Map Scale: V - 200 ft. N
Print Date: 9/5/2013
This map is a compilation of data from various
sources and Is furnished "AS IS" with no
representation or warranty expressed or
implied, including fitness of any particular
purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and
completeness of the information shown.
COPYRIGHT ® HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013
k1a,
From: Scott Busyn — Great Neighborhood Homes
To: Corey Teague
Community Development Director
City of Edina
Subject: Subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass into Two Separate Lots
Date: July 17, 2013, Revised September %2013
Please find the attached Subdivision Application for 6609 Blackfoot Pass. Great
Neighborhood Homes will be purchasing this property from Mr. Douglas L. Johnson
contingent upon obtaining a successful subdivision from the City..
It is our intention to subdivide the parcel into two separate lots, noted as Lot 1 and Lot 2
on the survey. Per the attached 500 foot area study, the subdivided lots will be above the
mean lot size, width, and depth of the lots in the neighborhood. Upon obtaining approval,
we will be building single family homes on each lot: The survey shows the potential
building pads of each home.
The proposed building pad for Lot 1 will be close to the location of the exiting home on
the site. We are adjusting the building pad to have a better presence on the lot (entry
facing Blackfoot Pass) and to allow for better main floor exposure to the back yard (the
current home has the first floor elevation at 927.0 feet and a lower level entry at 918.9
feet). The front setback of the home on Lot 1 is being proposed no closer than 53.5 feet
from Blackfoot Pass. This is the average setback of the existing home at 6605 Blackfoot
Pass and the proposed home on Lot 2 of 6609 Blackfoot pass. The first level floor height
of the lot l home will have a maximum elevation of 928. The proposed home will meet
all other zoning requirements.
The proposed building paetfor the Lot 2 will have a proposed front yard setback no closer
than 45' from Blackfoot Pass and no closer than 45' from Cheyenne Trail. This is in
character with other front yard setbacks in the neighborhood, specifically the two other
homes at the intersection of Blackfoot Pass and Cheyenne Trail. 6621 Cheyenne Trail has
a front yard setback of 42' and 6624 Cheyenne Trail has a front yard setback of 45.
Positioning the Lot 2 building pad in the proposed location will maximize the distance of
the home from 6705 Cheyenne Trail, minimize the disruption of the >18% slope, and
keep the new home away from the grove of oak trees in the rear of Lot 2. In addition,
there is an existing opening on the natural forest where we are locating the driveway
entrance (see exhibit A). The proposed home on Lot 2 will have a maximum first floor
height of 901. This will allow adequate drainage around the home. The new home will
meet all zoning setbacks except for the front setback.
We sent a letter out to all homeowners within 500' and held a neighbor meeting at the
site on August 8h. The meeting was attended by the adjacent neighbors at 6605 Blackfoot
Pass, 6601 Blackfoot Pass, 6621 Cheyenne Trail, and 6705 Cheyenne Trail. The feedback
M
from the meeting was that we do what we can to maintain the wooded look of the front
and sides of the lot. There is also a stone retaining wall on the south end of the comer of
Blackfoot Pass and Cheyenne Trail that the neighbors hoped we did not remove. Based
on this feedback, we are proposing a 10' conservation easement to maintain the wooded
look of the property from the street (see exhibit B and Q. This easement is shown on the
survey and will cover the north and south lot lines, as well as the front portions of the lot
as shown on the survey. The only exceptions to this easement will be the driveway
entrances for Lots 1 and Lots 2.
Please let me know if you have any questions about this application. I can be reached at
952-807-8765 or scoff@greatneighborhoodhomes.com.
Thank you for reviewing this application.
45—
�
t4�vy
e"
x�
6609 Blackfoot Pass Variance Application�' a °"
Great Neighborhood Homes
We are proposing a variance for the front yard setback for the proposed home on
Lot 2 of 6609 Blackfoot Pass. As lot 2 is a corner lot, city ordinance requires the
home to meet the front setbacks of 6605 Blackfoot Pass (62.0 feet) and 6705
Cheyenne Trail (100.9 feet). We are proposing a front setback of 45 feet from
Blackfoot Pass and 45 feet from Cheyenne Trail
The proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the
zoning ordinance for front setbacks on corner lots. Meeting the setback of the home
at 6705 Cheyenne Trail (100.9 feet) would require the home to be built far back on
the lot and into a steep slope (survey shows where position of home would be
without a variance). Placing the home in this location would create the following
practical difficulties:
1. The home would need to be built into a steep slope, requiring substantial
retaining walls to access the rear yard.
2. The home would be built much closer to the neighbor at 6705 Cheyenne' Trail.
When I toured the site with here she much preferred the home be built further
away.
3. Building the home here would be much more disruptive to the virgin forest and
require the removal of many more mature oak trees than on the pad closer to
the street.
4. The deeper location would require a much longer driveway, increasing the
impervious surface on the site.
S. The home would have to be built at a much higher elevation and appear much
taller from the street.
6. The home would block the natural drainage flow of the slope on Lot 2.
7. The homeowner would have minimal backyard without building a tall retaining
wall.
The use of Lot 2 for building a home is a reasonable use of the property.
The proposed variance will correct the following extraordinary circumstances
applicable to this property but not applicable to other properties in the vicinity:
1. Most lots in Indian Hills are not corner lots and thus do not need to meet the
zoning requirements of 6609 Blackfoot Pass. In addition, other existing
corner lots in Indian Hills do not have adjacent homes built as far back from
the street as seen at 6705 Cheyenne Trail (see 6617 Cheyenne Trail, 6621
Cheyenne Trail, 6821 Cheyenne Trail, 6601 Blackfoot Pass, 6600 Blackfoot
Pass, 6401 Indian Hills Road), or were built without having to meet the
setbacks of both adjacent homes (see 6820 Cheyenne Trail,).
2. Allow for 45 foot front setbacks similar to adjacent properties at 6621
Cheyenne Trail (42 feet) and 6624 Cheyenne Trail (45 feet).
3. Allow for flat front and backyard area as is found on most homes in the area.
The proposed variance will be in harmony and intent of the zoning ordinance as
follows:
1. 1 believe the ordinance for corner lots was written to avoid homes being built
that would break up the streetscape on more dense urban, gridded streets.
6609 Blackfoot Pass is a very wooded site and the proposed home will be
built almost 100 feet from the next closest home. The existing woods and our
proposed conservation easement will prevent the proposed home from
breaking up the streetscape.
2. Our proposed conservation easement and positioning of the driveway
entrance will maintain the same streetscape that exists today. There is a
natural opening in the forest where we are positioning the driveway
entrance.
The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood as
follows:
1. Our proposed conservation easements will maintain the wooded look of the
property from the front streets as well as the adjacent neighbors.
2. As stated above, there are homes near the corner of Blackfoot Pass and
Cheyenne Trail that have approximately 45' front setbacks.
3. Indian Hills is Edina's most eclectic neighborhood. There are no two lots that
are alike as far as setbacks, position of the homes, etc. This variance is in
character with the overall eclecticism of the neighborhood.
The building pad at the 45 foot front setback is a much more optimal location for the
home. In addition, I can limit the building height to 35' if we build on this more level
location.
R
�r
R
IK
r
�t
r
I.
kit
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR:
126-13 REF: 31-13 128,63 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES
Legend
—n — --I
--SSH— Tra' Seer I A
O VmJro4
I191d PY:
Inver IW 1
O pdrmt
Qwe rr«
caw.ro o.0.
Tamen Ref<Virq wd 1
® Rnryrorr3 Red'auq wM
Reava+ed Rete' uq ws1
a9w.o FYew9 o.rovnn
a9a0Atw Tep a wa nrewm 1
�90o-- Ftl33r9 cmmr
r -000-n Rrepred <nMsa
M trod Yard Seiead
m sa. rrd sde<d
RR Rar Yard SeNad 1
ppwatet Irtn Yeruwit Femd '
o �yRbaz.y �I� �1
co
Q
O /
is
Q'
�r
WAt (d Sa1Mdr) r I= IM A
R ��I
OrD3r -130.0 R n
wwe�W feleW� 1311 R l
DpN�315.0R
Bees va000r Me - 317
3011 G!1➢StE 1Rll 430'3
b24 OCYWIE9 35.73 \
p/lOpQilY 06cRp00e 1st <.
Eann
Ord 1. b. Yawmla S.wWI wrn.
tfemepn
31xOVWRk —l.. / W —1 1
/SN4 ertl /ON0. Ornee'nn � 391.00. \ \
3'DIE Ns SeartA Wee VMe it AM ia..nenro
tAIE: Tw lowlbn el 0.1 udEu Wen nn Imm pima \
NNtlW M W a0ipr wnpmW M mn
apge.tnala. 1Riy <wrgaitee SmUd M na3fM
In em<1 bcaEm bf JdM W n<aw0oa
1 OreeJ eeM1YY iM Sfa wwm3�%e� Pr< n report ere Seepnnd M \ P r\
o W w Ina' dfed nrpwdden oM Ynt I on a dJ5 na 14aeC
tm9 3 ryr un&r W laee M 1M Sbro K Ynermro.
W6 1 3 a Say. imWn M o.en 1R � SOAMr: S
Waodme A. borrn. RLS. So! REG 15p.1(1
oaroe M-044311 i�mt sa�uade Q�ie �eie�e�w�w.9 � iSsnliw <i � Po.vnW et t0as'
Uev GiH �l9 (4M:.9 Ihne � 31U]
wW".a n�u`..e d ra9M neiFr.*rn� e" Gn4 Icaae uaw uj
Nan. iaiu.rt a la+ �pm+�b 0.q cam•
At(
NOT TO SCALE
V)
LJ
F-
C <'
F_ o
V1 --
F-
W -
n
LJ <
U1
<C -,
m O
,n
F- c�
V) <C
Concrete Curb
Timber Retaining Wali
Keystone Retaining Wall
Proposed Retalning Wall
Exiating Elevallon
Top of Wall EWatiw
ExleHng Contour
Proposed Contour
Front Yard Setback
Side Yard Setback
Rear Yard Setback
i Monument Found I
PlasBc Cap I
LS. 15230.
S
F
oaonee = 428 SF
= 745t SF
00T
IONS:
927.8
2918.9
= 818.4
918A
_r 1.07 Aar"
153.8 Ft.
ar oat Ac,
_ 150.1 Fl.
Y
.f
.f
4, Block 3, INDV%N HILLS,
iepin County, Minnesota.
lest Side of Cheyenne In Between
08. Elevation = 891.08.
k&
1
�i
VICINITY
NOT TO S
z
CL
J
•
/ 8
!
6j hM
/O
�sw vx tlh
V
ew
/
1
R
_r 1.07 Aar"
153.8 Ft.
ar oat Ac,
_ 150.1 Fl.
Y
.f
.f
4, Block 3, INDV%N HILLS,
iepin County, Minnesota.
lest Side of Cheyenne In Between
08. Elevation = 891.08.
k&
1
�i
VICINITY
NOT TO S
WOO ElowNon
Cmmaur
N Cahtback
nA Setback
and Setback
.ent i'ou"n v
1
x JV30 , 1 11 OF wtijjjjl
�n �C IMAs wie j
(07
426 OF
t SF
cC 0 i1 t
W
Y
W.-
LW
.+
tai
M.Q4flSOOS RY v ' , • ."
TOV 00va
11
v i rl of I
Y U 1V i
$ack
wck
wck
A
'^
co i
I
�
yy�
6awl
CO /aw'°f
�i
�aLTk
( a
Nw
G �
Q M
J
`
L rr7 L_ V I
sn-
PROPERTY AREA, LOT DEPTH, LOT WIDTH & MEDIAN VALUE
EXHIBIT FOR POSSIBLE LOT SPILT OF 6609 BLACKFOOT PASS,
LOT 4, BLOCK 3, INDIAN HILLS
Ow TO S=
w i1M YM YMNS K
MIS+ A Ya+l. NI MCY 1Li10
eyr. iFtlF�it
Cary Teague
From: Lynn Laaksonen <goldielax@comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 5:59 PM
To: Cary Teague
Subject: proposed subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass
This letter is to state our opposition to the subdivision of 6609 Blackfoot Pass. We have been residents of Indian hills for
over 36 years and we strongly oppose this subdivision. Indian Hills has always been the part of Edina where you could
have a big lot — or 2 big lots — with a wild area surrounding your home and see the deer, fox, coyotes, raccoons and wild
turkeys. You can picture what it was like before the highways and the shopping areas and you can enjoy the quiet. You
can have a big house or a very big house and no one complains that you're too big because the lots are big enough to still
give you privacy. We don't want to be the Country Club area . We don't want to be a "renamed neighborhood" of Indian
Hills. This proposed subdivision is in the heart of the original Indian Hills and all of the homes that were added to the new
neighborhood are adding data and averages that are making it look like we all have smaller lots with homes close to the
street .
Several homeowners in the heart of Indian Hills actually have 2 lots so they have a bigger footprint. Over 30 years ago
there was a proposed subdivision at 6520 Indian Hills Road. The threat was that if the lot wasn't subdivided, a HUGE
house would be built. Well, the subdivision was strongly opposed in the neighborhood and it did NOT go through. A
HUGE house was built — it has since been torn down and an even bigger house was built and no one complained
because the lot was big enough to support it.
We don't want 6609 Blackfoot Pass subdivided. The proposed lots are out of scale and will not provide the 30'
conservation easement. This will NOT be good for Indian Hills. This will NOT be good for Edina. You have the chance
to avoid the problems that we are seeing in Country Club — don't bring them to Indian Hills.
Kay and Lynn Laaksonen
6404 Indian Hills Road
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Originator
Meeting Date
Agenda #
Cary Teague
September 11, 2013
VI.C.
Community Development
Director
INFORMATION & BACKGROUND
Project Description
John Adams, on behalf of property owner Ted Warner is proposing to subdivide
the property at 5 Merilane into three lots. (See property location on pages A1—
A4.) The existing home is located in the middle of the property, and would remain
as proposed. A new driveway would be constructed to serve the existing home,
as the current driveway would be located on proposed Lot 3. The existing
driveway would be used for access to a new home on Lot 3. (See applicant
narrative and plans on pages A5 A13.) To accommodate the request the
following is required:
Preliminary & Final Plat.
The proposal meets all minimum lot size requirements. Within this neighborhood,
the median lot area is 48,249 square feet, median lot depth is 277 feet, and the
median lot width is 192. (See attached median calculations on pages A7 A9.) All
three lots would gain access off Merilane. (See page A13.)
Surrounding Land Uses
The lots on all sides of the subject properties are single-family homes, zoned
and guided low-density residential.
Existing Site Features
The existing site is located on the curved portion of Merilane. The site is 3.48
acres in size, and contains a single family home. The site contains some
gradual slopes and mature trees. (See pages A3, A4 and A13.)
Planning
Guide Plan designation
Zoning:
Lot Dimensions
Single -dwelling residential
R-1, Single -dwelling district
The proposed subdivision meets all lot dimension requirements.
Grading/Drainage and Utilities
The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally
acceptable. Adequate drainage and utility easements are proposed along all
the lot lines. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city
engineer at the time of building permit application for each lot. A construction
management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. A
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required.
Park Dedication
As with all subdivision proposals, park dedication is required. Edina City Code
requires a park dedication fee of $5,000 for each additional lot created.
Therefore a park dedication fee of $10,000 would be required.
Primary Issue
• Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for the site?
Yes. Staff believes that the proposed subdivision is reasonable for the
following reasons:
1. The proposed subdivision meets all minimum zoning ordinance
requirements. As such, the applicant is entitled to subdivide the property.
2
Area
Lot Width
Depth
REQUIRED
48,249 s.f.
192 feet
277 feet
Lot 1
50,863 s.f.
281 feet
337 feet
Lot 2
50,511 s.f.
202 feet
373 feet
Lot 3
50,455 s.f.
268 feet
334 feet
The proposed subdivision meets all lot dimension requirements.
Grading/Drainage and Utilities
The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally
acceptable. Adequate drainage and utility easements are proposed along all
the lot lines. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city
engineer at the time of building permit application for each lot. A construction
management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. A
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required.
Park Dedication
As with all subdivision proposals, park dedication is required. Edina City Code
requires a park dedication fee of $5,000 for each additional lot created.
Therefore a park dedication fee of $10,000 would be required.
Primary Issue
• Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for the site?
Yes. Staff believes that the proposed subdivision is reasonable for the
following reasons:
1. The proposed subdivision meets all minimum zoning ordinance
requirements. As such, the applicant is entitled to subdivide the property.
2
2. The applicant has located the driveways so as not to disturb the mature
trees on the site. (See page A13.)
3. Building pad locations would meet all minimum setback requirements.
(See pages Al2—A13.) The front yard setback requirements are
established by the average of the two homes on either side. With the
existing home to remain, the front yard setbacks for Lots 1 & 3 are
established by the average setback of the existing home on Lot 2 and the
adjacent homes.
Staff Recommendation
Because the proposed subdivision meets all of Edina's Zoning Ordinance
requirements, recommend that the City Council approve the proposed three lot
subdivision of 5 Merilane.
Approval is based on the following findings:
The proposal meets all the required standards and ordinances for a
subdivision.
2. The applicant has located the driveways and home to minimize tree and
slope disturbance.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary
approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the
preliminary approval will be void.
2. Park dedication fee of $10,000 must be paid prior to release of the final
plat.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be
submitted:
a. Submit evidence of a Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to
meet the district's requirements.
b. Curb -cut permits must be obtained from the Edina engineering
department. Driveway plans must be consistent with the proposed
grading plan to preserve as many trees as possible.
C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer.
3
d. A construction management plan will be required for the
construction of the new homes.
e. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer.
Deadline for a City Decision: November 4, 2013
H
I
a Property
Map
Property
Map
li
t, 4602
This map is a compilation of data from various
4603 : -
4601
4612
4608
4604 4603 l 46D2
representation or warranty expressed or
s
4616,
Implied, including fitness of any particular
.
e..
ryw
4604
Parcel 3,48 acres
4605
COPYRIGHT ®HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013
Area: 151,680 sq t<
-
58045800
, 4600
5808
€ �
ti
4700
WIT to
6
4
5
2
_ 4701
5805
4700 ^y
-
->
4708
I
"� 24 �,
7
4705
4712
4704
24
24�
$ 4715
8
4708
v,
4724
1e 4721
4725 ' 4729
,.
4733
i
4800
9
4NNAWAV-
'f
4800,
I
4808 e'�+,
20�
24
i
4801
4801
,
9
�
13
4812
yy
E
i
48019
5
� •
4877
4810
4811
4820is
-
Parcel
Map Scale: V : 400 ft.
29-117-21-12-0009
ID:
Print Date: 9/5/2013
Owner
H David Warner Etal
Name:
Parcel
5 Merilane
Address:
Edina, MN 55436
Property
Residential
27 29
25 _L
23a�I
ad 21
19
17
15 ,
do �
9 8
�-6 _
7
4
M
Type:
This map is a compilation of data from various
sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no
Home-
representation or warranty expressed or
stead: Homestead
Implied, including fitness of any particular
purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and
completeness of the information shown.
Parcel 3,48 acres
COPYRIGHT ®HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013
Area: 151,680 sq t<
h
AM-tc+P
A1*RR/M u
Froin: Ted E. Wanner and f olui F. Adams ( Cold~ ell Banker Burnet
To: Cary Teague
Community Development Director
City of Edina
Subject: Subdivision of 5 Merilane into 3 separate lots total (2 additional lots)
Date: August S, 2013
My family, the Warner family, has owned this property for almost 50 years. We have
watched Rolling Green undergo many changes, 'including numerous subdivisions and many
new homes built in place of older homes being torn down. We currently have the second
largest parcel in the neighborhood, alinost 3.5 acres, other than the "Short Property" which
is 15 acres.
It is our intention to subdivide the parcel into three separate lots, noted as Lot 1, Lot 2 and
Lot 3 on the survey. Per the attached 500 foot area study, the subdivided lots will be above
the mean lot size, width and depth of the lots in the neighborhood. We have executed
contracts with John Kraemer & Sons, Inc. on Lots 1 and 2, contingent upon obtaining our
subdivision approval. It is Cary Kra, emer's (President of John I{iaeiner & Sons, Inc.)
intention to leave the existing house on Lot 2 until he gets a client put in place that decides
whether they want to remodel the existing house or tear it down and build a new single
family home on lot 2. Upon obtaining approval, Kraemer would also be building a single
family home on Lot 1. The survey shows the building pads for. both Lot 1, under contract
with Kraemer and Lot 3 currently either being sold or possibly kept by a family member.
Out proposed subdivision complies with all of the City's ordinances and we are not seeking
any variances.
If you have any questions about this application, please contact John F. Adams at
612,720.4827 or JAdamsncbbu net.com.
t
WARNER ESTATES
fROAMWftAT FOR","
THE H. D. WARNER ESTATE
OF LOT 5, ROLLING GREEN
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Lot contalus 3,48+- Hems
LEGAL OESCRFIlOff OF PREMISES SURVEYED,
Lot 6, ROLLING GREEN
116= y o
tht ra�= of lod propatY +f
and*atangt.and It dome tat =t
iron m Monte. the anke p" and ft -m am no gaps orevorlaps
owam
V*h ad)On%p
(cf, at Edw down)
usurned Mdso.*% Sho% —1. =Uprr 1% ptopoad dr
vu and houses mid B'dianufar and larger.
P I D.* 20-117-21-12 M
CURRENT ZONING t R-1 ACto
N G
,Cl
cvgoilrr,--
SCALE IN FELT
ERS
JOWNOANA. WARNER DAVIVA. WARNER ANOTED LWARNER
CAO
ADAMS.
N
ET
WAyrAM=
612-12D4w
j4dwnjQcbW-wL—
GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING. ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING
448 N. WILLOW DRIVE
LONG LANE. MINNESOTA 359E4
551.479.4141
FAA: SSE -479-4485
5 MERMANE
H. D. WARNER ESTATE
EDIAN LOT AREA WITHIN 5lf10'
JULY 31, 2013
ADDRESS LOT AREA* S.F.
8 Merilane
657,865
1
7 Merilane
68,206
5
6 Merilane
56,087
7
4 Merilane
51,305
10
2 Merilane
120,550
3
4600 Merilane
112,227
4
4602 Merilane
47,933
15
4603 Merilane
18,649
28
4604 Merilane
36,258
21
4608 Merilane
34,273
23
4612 Merilane
37,479
20
4616 Merilane
51,057
12
4700 Merilane
_4 .249
14 Median
4704 Merilane
48,435
13
4708 Merilane
43,958
17
4733 Annaway Dr.
51,227
11
4729 Annaway Dr.
45,696
16
4725 Annaway Dr.
41,138
18
4715 Annaway Dr.
52,805
9
4705 Annaway Dr.
57,352
6
4701 Annaway Dr.
52,969
8
4605 Annaway Dr.
30,014
25
4602 Annaway Dr.
28,737
26
4601 Annaway Dr.
38,799
19
5808 Mait La.
30,779
24
5805 Mait La.*
131,677
2
5804 MaifLa.,
35,640
22
5800 Mait La.
24,817
27
* From Hennepin County property records
° 5805 Mait La. is in 3 parcels.
NOTE: 14 & 15 are tied for the median. We used the higher number 14 to be'�
conservative.' "`
GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC
SURVEYING, ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING
445 N. WILLOW DRIVE
LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 66854
962-47b-4141
FA%t 982-873-4436
5 MERILANE
H. D. WARNER ESTATE
MEDIAN WIDTH WAN 500'
JUNE 31, 2013
ADDRESS
1.,t3T WII)"f* FT
RANK
8 Merilane
580
1
7 Merilane
202
9
6 Merilane
178
18
4 Merilane
176
19
2 Merilane
60
27
4600 Merilane
180
17
4602 Merilane
30
28
4603 Merilane
94
26
4604 Merilane
228
6
4608 Merilane
212
8
4612 Merilane
M
3 ° wi �
4616 Merilane
139
23
4700 Merilane
140
22
4704 Merilane
260
5
4708 Merilane
282
3
4733 Annaway Dr.
290
2
4729 Annaway Dr.
200
11
4725 Annaway Dr.
201
10
4715 Annaway Dr.
195
13
4705 Annaway Dr.
191
15
4701 Annaway Dr.
187
16
4605 Annaway Dr.
110
25
4602 Annaway Dr.
281
4
4601 Annaway Dr.
213
7
5808 Mait La.
112
24
5805 Mait La,"
162
20
5804-Mait La.
196
12
5800 Mait La.
141
21
* Distance scaled from Hennepin County maps
° 5805 Mait La. is in 3 parcels.
NOTE: 14 4.IG. 15 are tied for the median. We used the higher number 14 to be, {
conservative. LL .
i
GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC.
XURVEVING. ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING
446 N. WILLOW DRIVM
LONG LUKE. 14INN980TA 86366
969.473.4141
PA9t 969.473.4439
5 MERII.ANE
H. D. WARNER ESTATE
DUN LOT DEPTH WMM 500'
JULY 31, 2013
ADDRESS
LOT D UMP FT +
RANK
8 Merilane
922
1
7 Merilane
340
6
6 Merilane
321
7
4 Merilane
293
10
2 Merilane
612
2
4600 Merilane
537
5
4602 Merilane
558
4
4603 Merilane
148
27
4604 Merilane
168
24
4608 Merilane
165
25
4612 Merilane
173
22
4616 Merilane
271
16
4700 Merilane
318
8
4704 Merilane
172
23
4708 Merilane
265
17
4733 Annaway Dr.
290
11
4729 Annaway Dr.
230
18
4725 Annaway Dr.
205
19
4715 Annaway Dr.
280
13
4705 Annaway Dr.
300
9
4701 Annaway Dr.
286
12
4605 Annaway Dr.
275
15
4602 Annaway Dr.
118
28
4601 Annaway Dr.
188
20
5808 Mait La.
.277
1vier
5805 Mait La.'
588
3
5804 Mait La
183
21
5800 Mait La.
154
26
* scaled from Hennepin County half section maps
° 5805 Mait La. is in 3 parcels. '#'
NOTE: 14 & 15 are tied for the median. We used the higher number 14 to be
conservative. _.
c�
V11
0
1.
2.
3
GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SURVEYING, ENGINEERING AND LAND PLANNING
44S N. WILLOW DRIVE
LONG LAKE. MINNESOTA 95356
931-473.4141
FAR: 962-677-4479
5 MERILANE
H. D. WARNER ESTATE
JULY 31, 2013
MEAN LOT AREA, DEPTH & WIDTH
OF LOTS WITHIN 500'
Mean lot area
Total of 28 parcels = 2,054,181 -t- 28 = 73,364 S.F.
Mean lot depth
Total of 28 parcels = 8637 28 = 308 Ft.
Mean lot width
Total of 28 parcels = 5432 28 = 194 Ft.
w
5
PROPERTY OWNERS ADDRESSES, NAMES & LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS •
WMEN 500 FEET OF 5 MERILA.NE (FROM HENN. CO. PROPERTY TAX RECORDS)
H. D. WARNER ESTATE
JULY 31, 2013
ADDRESS NAME LEGAL DESCRIPTION
8 Merilane Marion Short Part of Lot S, Rolling Green
7 Merilane Mary Ingebrand•Pohlad Part of Lot 8, Rolling Green
6 Merilane Michael & Sandra Genau West % of Lot 6, Rolling Green
4 Merilane David & Lynn Evinger Lot 1, BL 1, Replat of Part Of Lot 6, Rolling Green
2 Merilane George & Linda Sherman Part of Lot 7, Rolling Green
4600 Merilane Lauren Meger Lot 3, B1.1, Wallings Add. I" Replat
4602 Merilane Charlotte Ketcham Lot 2, B1.1, Wallings Add. 1s` Replat
4603 Merilane William Riley Lot 1, BL 1, Wallings Add. 15'Replat
4604 Merilane Mark & Hedwig Holmberg Lot 12, B1. 1, Gunnar Johnsons 2nd Rgt Rolling Green
4608 Merilane Robert Perry Lot 11, B1. 1, Gunnar Johnsons Vw Rgt Rolling Green
4612 Merilane John Raskind & Katherine Kendall Lot 10, B1. 1, Gunnar Johnsons 2°4 Rgt Rolling Green
4616 Merilane Jane Hulbert Lot 9, B1. 1, Gunnar Johnsons 2nd Rgt Rolling Green '=
4700 Merilane Scott & Tiffany Stuart Part of Lot 60 & 60A, Rolling Green Sec. 2 & Lot 1, Bl. l Gunnar Johnsons
Rgt Rolling Green
4704 Merilane James & Katheryn Ganley Part of Lot 60A, Rolling Green Sec. 2 & Lot 1, B1.1, Gunnar Johnsons Rgt
Rolling Green
4708 Merilane James Lopesio Lot 2, B1, 1, Gunnar Johnsons Rgt Rolling Green
4733 Annaway Dr. David & Ann Wichmann Lot 3, Bl. 1, Gunnar Johnsons Rgt Rolling Green
4729 Annaway Dr. Frank Gougeon Lot 4, Bl. 1, Gunnar Johnsons Rgt Rolling Green
4725 Annaway Dr. Scott & Jennifer Gill Lot 5, B1. 1, Gunnar Jolmsons Rgt Rolling Green
4715 Annaway Dr. Sheila Walsh Lot 52, Rolling Green Sec. 2
4705 Annaway Dr. Octavio & Jody Porta Jr. Lot 53, Rolling Green Sec. 2
4701 Annaway Dr. David & Patricia Murphy Lot 54, Rolling Green Sec. 2
4,605 Annaway Dr. Larry & Terrie Rose Lot 5, B1. 1, Gunnar Johnsons Vd Rgt Rolling Green
4602 Annaway Dr. John Otterlei Part of Lot 3, B1.1, Gunnar Johnsons 20d Rgt Rolling Green
4601 Annaway Dr. Stephen & Susann Stenbeck Lot 4 & Part of Lot 3, BL 1, Gunnar Johnsons 2°d Rgt Rolling Green
5808 Mait La. Jeffrey & Olivia Hornig Lot 6, Bl. 1, Gunnar Johnsons 2°d } Rolling Green
5805 Mait La. R. J. Sheehy & A. Kmetz-Sheehy Lot 59, Rolling Gunnar Johnsons 2 Rgt Rolling Green
5804 Mait La. Patricia Maloney Lot 7, Bl. 1, Gunnar Johnson 2nd Rgt Rolling Green
5800 Mait La. Howell & Carrie McCullough Lot 8, BL 1, Gunnar Johnsons 28d Rgt Rolling Green
tea« .....
ON Eub"m2ft
as a»n.tw —' —Z
VI
ST MANHOLE
NoOaa !ice
ZZ
:t uN aaV4aa1JN f .� i0
YIN R:tl eagle / rr/ "'" � ! ""^•-
LOT I
,a alalntE °f . �soesa.- s.F I I
1.114-ACRES I
/ r OTOEPTH=W ( j
\y\ / LOT PEPJMETER-1004 I I
LOT WIDTH TO PERIMETERRAT1040.26
!ice• w t�IF
:� MM"
TMSLQTI
MCA-
OT 2
' � I
Lori
I f I 73
LOT PERIMETERa9e1
1 j I LOT WIDTH TO PERIM I
i I 1 at ti i I
i
101 I oG
__`�--- tr \\ 1 1
1 1
lk LOT 3
1 11 LOTWIDTW=1ACRES I
t axe`.
34
LOT PERIMELOT TER > 968 / / 'S/ 110 FT 1n9t y ENSUE P
1 \ ` LOT WIDTH TO PERIMETER RATIO .28S, MANHOLE
ANM
/ / IkNO 60b1[ 1OOF DEET
tp
owest `\ \ ` PANEL OU
GT MANIDLE
RIM BEv4a2l
ti 1 31
91
/ MSTM OUSEBiEfBWON i
aravvaiou� � � /
o�
t .ti, �� ~�.� 0 30 $U 120
MV fteo4mAm
aN dElhdh5lE
IWWVZ~A"
pwavm�
VAVm pa
ALI "m I
.2
L03
CoT�Tp
IX
Alta z
mw
X/r LAW
3 S, Is
W 5 11OFT"
/21
j ' I I I to
SIP
93
\v
4k
\LOT
v,
WK
'I SAME 4\
rlm upoona
w REAMW
OMMHMMSETBACKON
TmLoTasoirr. 3N
ma
4,
N V,
Lot contains 3.48+- acm
I Fr.Ai nRlq(RtpnnN nF PREMISES SURVEYED;
413
MEMO
A.
City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861
Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com
Date: September 11. 2013
To: Planning Commission
From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director
Re: Proposed Subdivision of 5820 Brookview Avenue into two lots — Agenda Item VI.D.
Please continue the public hearing for this item to the September 25, 2013, Planning Commission
meeting. This will allow adequate notification time for signage to be posted on the property.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 5016 St • Edina, MN 55424
ty9SN�1'lr�„
0 a �1
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Originator
Meeting Date
Agenda #
Cary Teague
September 11, 2013
VII.A.
Community Development
Director
INFORMATION & BACKGROUND
Project Description
Mr. Michael Gorman is requesting to shift the existing lot line that divides his property at
5100 Mirror Lakes Drive and the Interlachen Country Club property. (See property
location on pages Al A3.) The purpose of the request is to shift the rear lot line of the
Gorman property into the golf course property to match a fence line that was installed
by a previous property owner of 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive. (See narrative and the
proposed lot line shift on pages A4—A8.)
Surrounding Land Uses
The surrounding properties and land uses include single-family homes and the
Interlachen golf course, zoned and guided low-density residential (See pages A1—
A2.)
Existing Site Features
Single-family home and the golf course.
Planning
Guide Plan designation:
Zoning:
Primary Issue
Low-density residential
R-1, Single-family residential
• Is the proposed lot division reasonable?
Yes. The resulting lot line shift does not create an additional lot. The division makes the
existing lot at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive slightly larger, going from 1.41 acres to 1.64
acres. The golf course loses a very small portion of a wooded area of the golf course.
(See page A2 and A8.) The division legally establishes the lot line that has been used in
practice as a result of the previous property owner's installation of a fence, retaining wall
and a portion of a swimming pool on the golf course property. The resulting lots would
still be larger than most in the area. The subject property at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive is
the largest lot on this portion of Mirror Lakes Drive. (See page Al.)
Staff Recommendation
Recommend that the City Council approve the Lot Division of 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive
and the Interlachen Golf Course:
Approval is subject to the following findings:
1. The proposed lot line adjustment does not create a new lot.
2. The division legally establishes the lot line that has been used in practice as a
result of the previous property owner's installation of a fence on the golf course
property.
3. The resulting lots are still larger than most lots in the area.
Deadline for a city decision: November 1, 2013
2
Parcel 5100 Mirror Lakes Dr
Address: Edina, MN 55436
Property Residential
Type:
Home- Homestead
stead:
Parcel 1.41 acres
Area: 61,226 sq ft
4(
This map is a compilation of data from various
sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no
representation or wananly expressed or
implied, including fitness of any particular
purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and
completeness of the information shown.
COPYRIGHT 0 HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013
a
I-----
1nteract , e Property
Maps Map
Pare 29-117-21-31-0012 AT -B: Torrens Map Scale: V = 50 ft. N
Print Date: 9/5/2013
OwnerName:
M B Gorman & E L Gorman Market $1,659,500
Parcel
5100 Mirror Lakes Dr
Tax
$26,306.30
Address:
Edina, MN 55436
Total:
(Payable: 2013)
Property
Residential
Sale
$1,390,000
Type:
Price:
This map is a compilation of data from various
sources and Is furnished "AS IS" with no
Home-
Homestead
Sale
03/2000
representation or warranty expressed or
implied, Including fitness of any particular
stead:
Date:
purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and
completeness of the information shown,
Parcel
Area:
1.41 acres
61,226 sq ft
Sale
Code:
Warranty Deed
COPYRIGHT 0 HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013
A %h'ink Green!
51
Of L1 ( AJ!
NARRariVF
To: Edina Planning Commission
From: Michael and Elizabeth Gorman
5100 Mirror Lakes Drive
Edina, MN 55436
Re: Lot Division Application (Miinor Lot Line Adjustment)
Date: August 25th, 2013
Summary:
The Gormans live at 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive, legally described as Loi, Block 2,
Mirror Lakes in Edina. The Gorman property adjoins Interlachen Country Club
(ICC). The parties are seeking a Lot Line Adjustment to reflect the purchase by the
Gorman family of.23 of an acre from ICC (Parcel A in the attached documents). A
purchase agreement for this transaction has been signed between the parties.
Rationale:
The purpose of the transaction is for the Gormans to acquire property from ICC
which has been encroached upon by a fence installed by the previous owners of the
Gorman property. The transaction will facilitate a clear delineation of the parties'
respective property interests.
ZI
SURVEY FOR: Michael & Elizabeth
} Gorman
Reference
JOB: 944-13 126-03 10-04
69/17 . 190-05 69/53
5100 MIRROR LAKES ROAD
'----------.o.Do----------'-i
xx @
Nr I I nr
^2 I ^Z
_______________e0v .v.lvb 230 brl ONp mUM vl IN .«IrM M.001«I.-------+'
Gvl W vl Uv wnlMy
00 1«r of NWI/s, 6E1/s-,
---'moi
/
i
lel 1, 0ba8 3. IIRROR va[8 Ix EOlxrt'fun
xrmreN GWIb. elsxWmtu
W ; WWRDx«IN¢B� Edxll �
14nlpinl D^+^ry. uwn.arU.
iNl pr1 .f Ll J ANRsn SeOCIALLan 11w SaE
IGU�ivwab aVaTi Seuin 01 On . 18 MnuM
em N lel S BIW I. vaN WRROR L01L3 W l
ergrrvC 9B Mwlw OS arwn8v YhN a aavw
at v«wCv M vv el ]0.83 larl; Inv.
. a.w. N ie.eeeiw�wLLr x..0 IS e.W
abr0 1, R UWsv x«u 81 C _
1 � Crum a3 m41rW Si rr Wnt
11 1uSSswln 0% averse civ mw
vl NJr lave ElWncr SwU Oo au.Wn
N •vle 41 I • Cbw.Wv N 119AD IrLL U Inv
.uvv sl P 1 A - 10,0[3.5
D.23 Ain
el z AUDRarz suBDmEaox xe zNt .
wrWw Is.Nr.:emB«I..
s..I,olmxs wuoWslBx x.a
0W W I vl 41 ] ewxen SueB.IWn Na S.E
MLal pv nuUval camaf rl uvE 1,
w ~ !0 � W >,vam�RebRLL� avM�ml
2013 Iv
rw 1818 CfrN; gess xexn 13 xry
�& P Ina U NeM 03 iyrv�lWO mwle
8 M�WNv 61«warmv Erf�e d putt d >0�
�I :matte $OrY1 00 Cnrm by 11
elaWd W 1 Uolu 11.. 1.1 U%Z
/—.4 1. vl W —.1, 230 bLL el —A M.
NORTH
m m
I
nacby
rc8al W
v ry ,
mi
d d SSunnvDOlc
W. BROW.
'.4
WDodr-
Oemd_
1
w �s*v a a
V.. *'Cc 86
J,aZ W :5au �n r.0! `Y- an
'G Cp�VLO ON it
v
o ZE 4 s
C ZL � OO'aaC�C
tow'
&4-t cv
0�3
c5amLb�iggc
c W M n
i r� �4on�EXaffia+
& opo'£ ra
e w e < yy� z c
Vii00 2,u
' c3 i �'E 3'
w L N wp +' �O to •-
m fl
£cpp��E..o'
c C N
J2 J2 d
Is o ttldZ.-�tf O
uaua AJUMdOPU )Www" UUI.WJWA 1014 auufvr,--}Nu 4411" Na4ut#JU JUd
'w
d
00
O N
O 0
04
V
0
CL
0
O
6
rE3:
�aC�to*,�;pp4e
% Z I
yc vo.+iiW
as
do
A`CIAZ. C r � r
'�
I
a
m
8
o ccs
N
N
�v$oao
Da
fa
to
"p'
"'!'r.
L n
t 9J
Its
C
30
08
Y'Y�E3r
-rS..
gpp`'
M n
M9
u
p
d
av�i 66ii�t��Qa
av
-p— X
a
J Y
pp yX�
d J 2 !at
Lc
i d' d Z
5100 MIRROR LAKES ROAD
SURVEY FOR: Michael &Elizabeth
I
Gorman �X � S•t Ifi�
V
-ro Ta &
COON i O
61,UB
St
Reference
126-03 10-04
xe. 144-13 89/17 ,190-05 89/93
COM—
w � w Y wNN u.ns N tp14
wwW � rwrk.
W 4NMN LY .0N{
Nm
w,.fMl .t w f rww w.os�. a w
f M W Y.tlMMI wW N w !. Yq
NN..N6 I.MV. SwM n
upw. >e n.u.lu CL rp �w.N aprM
.1 ..a.n4 fW. N-ur N R.YS !Nh 6M
KIlrwx N !W tMlt YV+a. ,W} ,f
A W,: ,.N...M Q1 Mme. L1 M1'wM
NYP 1. N .4+W !i .aMM fYal
1�:1rSP.t Y� rwll W . N,IIIn � X:
W q NMN. f.Nll W flM... If NNNn 11
fN.lMwwr ].+fA,�MN. �t1�If 1.N k�M
rrsc rroler • - faa..xe
axe Aek
� I r-.rwsrr. ,, -rr r.ln wexNr
N wtw0.'/W . NM.s. M f0Y NN: M
N � Nw.a N ,W k.0 MMa kIM. U M
NNw. N M.f1 nw M... sM+. m NrH
--� N .0 w 1. NNw. r l raw kN k M.
-----------.-----------------q MM 2N M V" 4RM4 N PM -WON M4 -----
i r
`r`JJ r-r.M w w w .aktl. tla r.N r anro mp
w mN
4t
44
1
�WN
iZ
a'
2
_i
�j i'—inN/� fnh
Ill n r
Scale 1' = 20. N
"Ole
0
n�
L
r&.Nwk
N. 9eaN
Wa.eroM
I
(000
L
I�
r � �YY��yYJJJJJ{{
( ^O
I ^
,r
n+e!
1 n—$
1 t tea l
A alna
$ f sm Cor I
t 1 I
(
t
Raferenee -~ i ��� s/
t44 -13128-D3 10-04
89/17 , 190-08 89/33
j 5100 MIRROR LAKES ROAD
S'URVE'Y .FOR:
Michael &= Elizabeth tt
Goan
rr
Ar M Y Lal S ArWt SuNwl�yYW. i�E
SIWrR=Mra.W Y4t t.N
.1 ; Z;
x rW.aw+wr ria Ms w.
.=.r
sau rwc sw rrn o= x .:..r
rrP !. Mrlw aS aJrM1 O) w.w MI
i IM S.�i4 Ot w� YIC
rr r W L OW! 1. W Wllq MRS 11 1
------.-.--�•---.,_-^^ --5.1 .Wry >b M1Y brl carry J a. =rra' sor= lia ---�--
/�r=. SI ribs OS iwwl Ibl a Mkna
4 rwY IMI • Mires N 7aS3 Mk M
bs
iMuu. r lau 1.«a rrw rrw u =y
a.f r.c u.m. Irrr Y is carr
<•
N N wwpa q P�iMM S) 1wsM krt
x rPru 6f rerw pr a Mrr�Rl Y X:
iYORTH
J2Go I
-- ��
{r IS N+=t stir O tlAw !1 arWR •i
r_Wl 1M =i .�sw MM Fxm r.Rr i. w
(000
L
I�
r � �YY��yYJJJJJ{{
( ^O
I ^
,r
n+e!
1 n—$
1 t tea l
A alna
$ f sm Cor I
t 1 I
(
t
Raferenee -~ i ��� s/
t44 -13128-D3 10-04
89/17 , 190-08 89/33
Mi0 N ft— A 101""
f L VOT S
vewn
1 �
SIWrR=Mra.W Y4t t.N
.1 ; Z;
x rW.aw+wr ria Ms w.
.=.r
sau rwc sw rrn o= x .:..r
rrP !. Mrlw aS aJrM1 O) w.w MI
------.-.--�•---.,_-^^ --5.1 .Wry >b M1Y brl carry J a. =rra' sor= lia ---�--
arc..
e IW r vlj4 flip -1
I �
<•
1 I
iYORTH
J2Go I
�`J�`'S`j t�,
1
`IJ
DP'
1w1M
1
1AnrW4 TW
h
Mur.sel.
.
Ql�
w. ewes
Iwmalr.
vO 20
O�
a zo w
Yom..
Seple 1" = 20, It