The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2013-09-25 Planning Commission Meeting PacketsAGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER if. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Planning Commission September 11, 2013 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Planning Commission will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered In the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Preliminary Plat. AKARE Companies. 5820 Brookview Avenue. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan — 3655 Hazelton Road B. Work Plan — 2014 VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS • Council Connection • Attendance IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS X. STAFF COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting. Next Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, October 9.2013 o e ca PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 25, 2013 VLA Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description AKARE Companies LLC on behalf of John Peterson is proposing to subdivide the property at 5820 Brookview Avenue into two lots. (See property location on pages Al—A4.) The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5—Al2.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,711 square feet for each lot. Both lots would gain access off Brookview Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,725 square feet, median lot depth is 134 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. (See attached median calculations on pages A10— Al2.) The new lots would meet the median width and depth, but would just fall short of the median lot size. Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low- density residential. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a single-family home and detached garage. (See pages A4 and A6.) These structures would be removed. Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single -dwelling residential R-1, Single -dwelling district * Variance Required Grading/Drainage and Utilities Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house would be reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, garage or driveway would have to be directed to Brookview Avenue. Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook-up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. History of Subdivision Requests in the Area The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this area. (See attached area map showing this locations of these requests on page A13.) The following is the history in the past seven years: Requested Subdivisions in the last seven years 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66 -foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 sJ & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50 -foot lots by Bravura Construction; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100 -foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 9,000 s.f. 75 ft 134 ft Lot 1 6,711 s.f.* 50 ft* 134 ft Lot 2 6,711 s. f. * 50 ft* 134 ft * Variance Required Grading/Drainage and Utilities Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house would be reviewed at the time of building permit. Drainage from any new home, garage or driveway would have to be directed to Brookview Avenue. Sewer and water are available to the site. Specific hook-up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. History of Subdivision Requests in the Area The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this area. (See attached area map showing this locations of these requests on page A13.) The following is the history in the past seven years: Requested Subdivisions in the last seven years 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66 -foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 sJ & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50 -foot lots by Bravura Construction; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100 -foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) wide. 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied their request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, the property at 5945 Concord Avenue was denied their request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median =10,028 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) Within the above requests 1-6, the medians were similar in size to that of the subject request. The request highlighted in red and underlined above (#4) was the property that was subdivided across the street from the subject property. Primary Issue • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met with this proposal. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is due to the fact that the subject property is double the size of all nearly all the lots on this block. This area was originally plated with 3 50 -foot lots, including the subject property. (See page A14.) There are a couple of 75 foot wide lots to the east. (See page A2.) The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood and original plat. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of his property of which the lots would be the same as existing lots in the area. In 2011 a property across the street at 5829 Brookview was approved for the exact subdivision and variances requested by the applicant. Additionally, in 2009, a similar subdivision and variances were granted at 5920 and 5924 Oaklawn. Therefore, to deny these variances would deny the applicant a subdivision that has been recently approved by the City. (See approved subdivisions on page A13.) b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to Brookview Avenue. The vast majority of the lots on Brookview are 50 feet wide and roughly 6,700 square feet in size. The circumstance of the oversized lot was not created by the applicant. C) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The neighborhood includes a vast majority of single-family homes on 50 -foot lots as proposed. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5820 Brookview Avenue and the lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,711 square feet. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width and depth and nearly meet the median area. 9 3. The proposal would restore the property back to the form of the original plat, which included two lots. 4. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. The practical difficult unique to the property is caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. This is caused by the original property owner, who combined two lots into one. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including nearly every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, a 50 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. In addition, the applicant would be denied a subdivision with variances that has been previously approved by the City, including the same request for a subdivision with variances that were approved right across the street in 2011. Approval is subject to the following conditions: The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina Engineering department. C. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. 5 d. Grading and drainage plans specific to any proposed house would be reviewed at the time of building permit, and shall be subject to review and approval of the city engineer. Drainage from any new home, garage or driveway would have to be directed to Brookview Avenue. Deadline for a City Decision: November 1, 2013 2 Interac . e Property Maps' Map y — r 55TH ST w 8J 55TH SITY.' 24) 6AIK OR LLJSIt'IGTOH AV LEXINGTON hVr - WO a 61' r 5532 �- m i o� .,� ;�tf �rw 24 a 56TH st v1 -'P 5605 o�I 'r " I KE l GGP t ... - -� f TOWER ST i •_ k `_. t i W LA ��.� i I o5655t6, I1 f 38�, t WOODLAND Rb 41' 4 4 5 S7TH ST w{ r � `f I 2024 r t ; �k C0HC0`RO TER l 1 f 71, 5701 PHILBRO0K LA r 24 es LM 9900 E' S9TH ST'b:' 591N St tik t Q z � e w - 4p 100 L R Q _ i1�7 p 60_ rH ST W Y �_w ! fOTH Srw r x g L ,24; Af VI a tib � �� x �`�-• i i ; � 6'l ST ST 6`1 � ` �x 24 24,.t. i � y., -- a 4tm - 4, RGpMI tq I i w24 GHt)M+CPCUR\ . ,t d 1' 14545 - a -. fin ST IN 6214LD) ST W Parcel 19-028-24-42-0016 Map Scale: l" - 800 ft. N ID: Print Date: 9/16/2013 Owner John S Peterson Etal Name: Parcel 5820 Brookview Ave Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property Residential Type: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Homestead representation or warranty expressed or Stead' implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.31 acres Area: 13,444 sq ft COPYRIGHT ®HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 !4 1 Mink Greent Interact e Property Maps Map 4420 441614 12 4408 4404 4400 4328 4324 4320 4316 = 4312 4308 4304 4300 4208 s .._ ..__f �, t 4204 a2�� 1 i1w � 4420 4416 4412 4408 4404 4400t4328 4324 4320 431E 143--12 < 4308 4304 4201,` 4200 O ,4A��a« 58TH ST W 5801 5800 5801 < 5800 i 5801 5800 5805 5804 s rvy~ 5805 5804 5805 5808 5808 5809 5808 5804 5809 5812 5812 i 5813 5812 LU 58165816 i _ i 5816 >I 5817 5817 9617i a3 5820 01 5820 w? �.T _ w 5821 _ ,tet 5821 5820 St' 5825 5824 zl _.. 4' 5825' ; ..ems#.. ay�A4c�aa �a a 5828 x 5824 5828 5829 5828 �l _5829 5832 5832 0'3 5833 5832 5833 5837 � 5836 5836 5837 5836 i 5837�`� . .5840 5840 5840 5841 " 5845 5841 5844 5844 5844 f ': .. _ 5845" I 59TH ST W" i 5900 5901 i 5900 5901 e > •��k� ash 5904 5905 5904 5905 59085909 5908 5%2 5913 5912 5916 5917 5916,, Parcel 19-028-24-42-0016 Map Scale: I" - 200 ft. N ID: Print Date: 9/16/2013 Owner John S Peterson Etal Name: Parcel 5820 Brookview Ave _ - Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property Residential Type: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS iS" with no Home- representation or warranty expressed or stead Homestead implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.31 acres Area: 13,444 sq ft COPYRIGHT ®HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 I ME Parcel 19-028-24-42-0016 ID: Owner John S Peterson Etal Name: Parcel 5820 Brookview Ave Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property Residential Type: Home- Homestead stead: Parcel 0.31 acres Area: 13,444 sq ft i Property Map Map Scale: V - 50 ft. N Print Date: 9/16/2013 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" wkh no representation or warranty expressed or Implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of ft Information shown. COPYRIGHT ® HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 A Think Greenl At sCA 1A NAR RAT NC CUSTOM HOMES PROJECT NARRATIVE The project is located in the City of Edina at 5820 Brookview Avenue (lots 6 and 7, Block 002, Fairfax). We are proposing to subdivide the current 100 -foot wide lot into the originally platted (2) 50 -foot wide lots. Our intention is to build two homes on this site that fit seamlessly with the existing character of the neighboring homes and community. There has been a recent, similar project on Brookview Avenue at 5829 and 5833; these two 50 -foot wide properties were also once a single 100 -foot wide property. Two new homes were built on this site in 2012; both homeowners (as well as others in the community) have given full support of our proposed project at 5820. A5 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5820 Brookview Ave Edina, MN FOR: Ridge Creek Custom Homes D 20 1 inch = 20fL 1 ( DI FEET ) A eb9_- ---- 37.9 X876.3 876.2 / / // / / / / _-----� T 864 - / 1 ( I I 1 •r' 1 8]6.9/ 869 4 : : 8fi7.9 L 866.6 864. ^ ` A NORTH 824 ... -..,866 5 ' X 876.7 " RtW'• `. .. 664.9: ..8]4.8 `. CE STEP I. . BJfi 4 X8]6.6 X. n House /'`'•"'•• MAP942 , %`..'';` n t.. ...�; 977.1 MAPLE 24 876.1 876 L, i 873)5 8 52 , 1 875.2 cx872.5 '. ; ; 865.8 t %:,.�. 880.2. ' .1.'87.3 ASH 24 ... .,... eeo.D ......N 89°55'43" E 134.19 a6o ... RW 6.5 ... � - . -876 :, ` Pinch' X RW7.4. x, RLS 6508 ...... 876.0 : �•`- '' A 878.6 __ohr76.587A88.8 .----.-- 76 L 5 A • 8 1 T � Inv:857.6 ,P 76.6 °h"-� n /BRGH 12 10 8 O 876.3 PINE 13 876.1 . / B79.3 3/4" OPE APLE 12 876.5 3 1 / ♦ -I- 877.8 875.6 .S A RW ---- L7 I 1 I 1 Y1 876.4 6.0'� FfEi X887 `� x 8.5 ' L . i 1 v 74�W EX. % � • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND _ : 0.9' EAST OF UNE � ,� 876.4 5.0 House 876: n / d, h Q x1011.2 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. 3 8A18 i3 1.Y LO 2 Q ^ x8.7 876.2 X 0 T08 7.6 DENOTES BITUMINOUS -> DENOTES SANITARY SEWER ' Rim: 866.5 B7 57 •RYO9 n -- Inv.850.4'. 8H 876.3 (b (�. ,: i / 23.1' LIJA 42 H89.2 q�q 0 B76.3 8 _y.-.�---------�_ me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed y 876.1 875.8 874.9: 8706 873.0 871 4 . 869 2 866. Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 878.6 x ?.x875.8 n n 876.6 1� bOi 0. JO HUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 7-15-13 Reg. No. 44655 876.D .. L _ ♦ / I / _ , U SPR 12 -' +j... ...... 8760 :;' 875.9 874 873.1 " ~8894 �:B6Y.4 � n "876.. _ B76.t875.7 72-114 876.2 875.2 2 9 '1! 87b.0 / / n �',r' RW'S 875.7 _ 26.1 SPR 14 •d'; jn 8]5.6 �ea > 876,1 878.0 SPR 12 •. • •.C.LI GF � . ° Garage „✓ ' _...........875:8 j ; .PINE 14* 1 872.2. '87$ ............. 875.4 �14,,!� / 1�.74.7 t; 'ttll�l``875.6.. .... . CHERRY 2.58763: g1 ...`•.1 2"'RBR 869.1 O 1/2' OPEN C•: Xa]l.6 Mv-.�.-J59'S5n fix) ` 876.5 C• „,. ]e. 13427 ... 9 -. ----- 41:2 ------- �j ...... a' LLI 1 +X873.8 / .1112 ej9 IE 2 8�I 1 i♦ -r'.' I\ Q 874.31^ I. x8]3._6 L_ ., ., Ex. 87,.31x: ^ i House / 868 7 / A V.\.1 - ---- 7nnQ-AAD%A-\1W.4Q4".n 7/17 /9n1'3 0.AC.n7 DY rnT 869.5 `. B6B. ° 1 I 'ry X873.2 AUG U 3 c 013 i I 869.6869 ^ 875.0' 669.2 ---------- ---------------------i Rim: 869.2 I I 869.4 I Inv:857.6 j 3 LEGEND I I. • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION X- DENOTES EXISTING FENCE x1011.2 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. (Per Tax Legal) 0 DENOTES CONCRETE -°""- DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE Lots 6 & 7, Block 2, FAIRFAX, Hennepin County, Minnesota. DENOTES BITUMINOUS -> DENOTES SANITARY SEWER -»-- DENOTES STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING TREE BENCHMARK Top nut of fire hydrant at SE quadrant of 58TH I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by Street and Brookview Ave. Elev.=869.22 me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. NOTES n - Bearing's shown are on assumed datum. ' Y - Field survey conducted on July 12th, 2013. JO HUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 7-15-13 Reg. No. 44655 - This survey was prepared without the benefit of ACRE LAND SURVEYING ; ; titiework. Easement, appurtenances and encumbrances ,�ryin9 Twin Cities Metro may exist in addition to those shown hereon. This hiesbey =survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a titleinsurance �gea flnd d .idgmai11.11 commitment or attorneys title opinion. 763-458-2997 acrelandsurve - Curb shots taken at top and back of curb. JOB #13448bs ro " 1= 13 14 15 19 1' IB n o° m n' 113 04 R5 n9 117 ne 119 I:D V.\.1 - ---- 7nnQ-AAD%A-\1W.4Q4".n 7/17 /9n1'3 0.AC.n7 DY rnT PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR: Ridge Creek Custom Homes Rob Eldridge, 4820 W 77th St #125 Edina, MN (612) 250-5820 ELDRIDGE 6TH ADDITION Owner: John S. Peterson and Sheila A. Peterson PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5820 Brookview Ave Edina, MN SITE DATA Total Area ----------0.31 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS ------2 LOT 1 -------------6711 Sq. Ft. LOT 2 -------------6711 Sq. Ft. Existing Zoning -------R-1 Proposed Zoning ------R-1 Utilities ------------Available SETBACK DATA Owner Bradley k Kathleen- - - _ Beery r-- --I I I r- I I H I I Existing House 5816 Brookview I 0 w I Avenue o Owner Z I George Raich ert L ------- I 134.24 Fairfax N 89'55'4311 E 134.19 Meas. Front Yard ---------Average of NORTH Adjacent Lots a 20 x m Side Yard -------- Varies with - a Building Height m (5 Ft. Minimum) 1100 Rear Yard ---------25 Ft. ( 1N FEET) ; Oo 1 inch = 20M 00C, SHEETINDEX z 1. PRELIMINARY PLAT i 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS € H 3. GRADING, DRAINAGE, UTILITY & TREE PLAN 0 3 mrd DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: I I I I _._.-._._)_._._.J I_._._._�.— - - - — 1/2' Ope v NO SCALE i BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES 0 AND REAR LOT LINES AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING SIDE LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. JO HUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 8-19-13 Reg. No. 44655 RLS 6508 'nU)nncn s�._._._._._.� 1 10 7 10 876.3 \ I 10 1 . APLE 12r I / ♦ / ♦ I / 5/4. OTEN x h< I 1 1 1 VC I 0.9' EAST OF W1415' - ♦ / / l ♦ I 10 � I ; I \ Oo I �yrnJla L Q \`/�-, K o " 134.2 " 10 1 I I . 10 � I ; i 10L -I 10 S 89'59'55" W 134.27 Me, </ r------- 134.21 Fairfax C Owner Gary Koktavy I Exlsth, House I I I 5816 Brookvlew I FFE 88.2 I � I I EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION BENCHMARK (Per Title Commitment HB -26478) Top nut of fire hydrant at SE Lots Six 6) and Seven quadrant of 58TH Street and ( (7), Block Two (2), 'Fairfax. Hennepin Brookview Ave. Elev.-869.22 County, Minnesota", according to the recorded plat thereof. JOB #13448bs 60 60 ACRE LAND SURVEYmog-na!L Serving Twin acesMetroarea and beyond763-458-2997 acrelandsurvotn 10 11 12 13 H IS 16 17 IS I9 Ila In 113 113 A4 IIS 116 117 IIS11 12 13 H 15 16 17 15 110 In a2 113 6S 116 11S IIS in GRADING, DRAINAGE, UTILITY & TREE PLAN - 87 FOR: Ridge Creek Custom Homes F°, Rob Eldridge, t :aj ASH'24 4820 W 77th St #125 Edina, MN (612) 250.5820 RW° ° HOMES STREET NGMIST BE USED F THE ROCK ENTRANCES NOT ADEQUATE 10 PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BONG TRACKED ONTO THE STREET. cx6725''. \ ELDRIDGE 6TH ADDITION is ,D r -676.8 8 PINE TS I Owner: John S. Peterson and Sheila A. Peterson NF 876.3 APf 12 879.3 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5820 Brookview Ave Edina, MN _R''_ ' i / SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES N CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING I e r ' 1 1. INSTALL STADUZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 2 INSTALLATION OF SLY FENCE 0 BN) -ROLL AROUND SITE 3. DEMOUTOR OF METING STRUCTURES IF ANY. ' y A. CLEAR AND CRUD. i STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL B. ROUGH CODING O SITE ` 'J TD�".}S L TABNZE DENUDED AREAS AND ATION REB B EXCAV FOR NEW NOM. FOUND TON '''•III...333��j, CONSTRUE -.AT 9. CONSTRUCT 4 W S1.TNUC FOUNDATIOA' 0 GONSTRVCT NEW STRUCTURE N 11. WE ALL CONSIRUCTIDI nYMTY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY ERHFR SEED OR SMAMOSCAMNG, REMOVE SILT FEA�GE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY TIE REMOVAL N EROSION PREVENTION 6 K 87 .6 TOT THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANING FOR AND IMPMU NTNC APPRO RATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE RW 878.6 % BUFTER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE CODING, AND OTHER CDNSTFUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION.;I 'N •1 * x87147 i Mc Al ALL EKPOSEO SOIL MEAS MUST BE SFAMIZED AS SOON AS POSSBLC TO UNIT SOL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN i OJ 14 DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTMTY IN THAT PORTNN OF THE SITE HAS DEMPDRARILY OR PERMANENTLY AS.. : < 878.0 SPR 12 r THE NORMAL VETTED PERIMETER OF MY TEMPORARY OR PERMMENT COINAGE GITCN OR SWAM THAT DRAMS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF ME CONSTRUCTION SIT[. OR DIVERTS WATER MOUND RIME 91E, MUST BE STABILIZED TNN 20 LINEAL FEET � � U FROM TME PROPERTY EDGE, OR FROM THE PONT OF DISGHANCE NIO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABIUZATION OF THE LAST 20""'• LINEAL FEET MUST BE COMPLETED NIMN 21 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO`A SURFACE WATER. E 1076. L91- _ • x-42 i 970.9 969.2 SIMILI'ATN,N OF THE REMAINING PORTONS OF MY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES M SWAMS MUST BE COUPLEIE 877:5 875`7 MZA DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER AND CONSTRUE M THAT PMTTDN OP THE DITCH HAS WNARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED, "M 875.6 SPR 12 TPMPORnRY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SMME THAT ARE BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED MEN DITCH CHECKS .0 ROLLS, SILT ONES ETC) DO NOT NEED TO BE S'TA91UAD. THESE MEAS MUST BE STABIUZIO WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT GONTNNNEW SYSTEM. ; MUST BE PRONDEO MM TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY GssNAnaN MRIIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION PIPE. OU SURFACE TO n SURFACE WATER. 10 i•` .. ......875•...I •.•...L SEDIMENT CONTROL -.~ SEDMLVT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MNa4ZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER ^ CL SYSTEMS AND SROM SEWER INLETS SEGMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTA9LSHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPORAOENT LANG i DSTURSNG ACTMIIES BEGAN. THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL BTAGU2ATIDN HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. L STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPRONOAM SUPS OUDNG FOMnTMCTOI UNTIL ALL SOURCES MIN i X 873.8 AL FOR OISGHCNG TO THE NMI HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.I OTENTM :F X876.6 875.4 x x, x 8T7.3 P24 8Z6.1 875.2 S ._._._._875.6 - -'-'- 876. 876.5 x FB/TUC 678,4 x(FFE=878.8) 676.2x FB/TUC....... (FFE=878.8) F UNLESS THERE S A BYPASS IN PLACE EOR THE STORMWATER STORMWA7ER, SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL CONTACT: VENAE TRACIONC OF SEOMEHI FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SIE UUST BE MINRAnD BY A ROCK CDNSTRUCTON ENTRANCE. • •••••, I ' HOMES STREET NGMIST BE USED F THE ROCK ENTRANCES NOT ADEQUATE 10 PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BONG TRACKED ONTO THE STREET. cx6725''. \ LEGEND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE x 6624' ME COFFIT OR Is NL-,:.- BLr AT ALL TM 6 FOR THE MAMTEMMGE AND PROPER OPERATION DF M09ON AND BEOUFNT D'2 DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION COl1ROL FACILITES TIE CDN1N....�' SHALL AT A MINIMUM. INSPECT, MANTAM AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL ENovoN AND M..., CONTRA ,.,., 'nes AND saL sTAeETZATIDN McAsuREs. a7j'1 �/ DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE BASE ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MA. M'D SHs11 MO11FY TINE EROSION AND SEORICNT CONTROL PLAN M BIRCH 12 10 8 t Q, :o 1 xt 011.2 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. ORDER TO PREVENT PCELUTANTS FROM MAMNC THE SITE W. FORM WATR RUNOFF. I •' S' oC»oo DENOTES EXISTING RETAINING WALL STORMWATER 71. moo DENOTES PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ^ DO I W I ' NORTH PHIAL MAD NO SHALL MAINTAIN TIE EdEPNC STORM WATER DRAINAGE PATTERNS TO THE E,M,1 POSSBIx .:..^ NNACTCAL AS TO NOT CAUSE ANY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES 984 'N •1 * x87147 i Mc Al i OJ r ^ '874,8 _ • x-42 i 970.9 969.2 ; 873.5 :RW i W eSS.8 01 ^ CL U TD �' IA A, S: , I I IE 14 OJ 5.4 B751 x CCCIII x e75.7:� -_ I' .2: 10 • Me7pp RRY 2.5 B7S8' x x876.1v-'. - _ .S t5 S S-'. 875. SX MW CORY SOL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE DR DTNER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS, ANO U,.'- BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS, IN LUDING STORMWATM CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTIER SYSTEMS, OR CONDUCTS ATM DITCHES UNLESS THERE S A BYPASS IN PLACE EOR THE STORMWATER STORMWA7ER, SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL CONTACT: VENAE TRACIONC OF SEOMEHI FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SIE UUST BE MINRAnD BY A ROCK CDNSTRUCTON ENTRANCE. MDCE CP[rG •uSFOM HOMES STREET NGMIST BE USED F THE ROCK ENTRANCES NOT ADEQUATE 10 PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BONG TRACKED ONTO THE STREET. pny tUIRMCE� -11111LRITZ LEGEND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE isl2-ANY - ME COFFIT OR Is NL-,:.- BLr AT ALL TM 6 FOR THE MAMTEMMGE AND PROPER OPERATION DF M09ON AND BEOUFNT D'2 DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION COl1ROL FACILITES TIE CDN1N....�' SHALL AT A MINIMUM. INSPECT, MANTAM AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL ENovoN AND M..., CONTRA ,.,., 'nes AND saL sTAeETZATIDN McAsuREs. �/ DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE BASE ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MA. M'D SHs11 MO11FY TINE EROSION AND SEORICNT CONTROL PLAN M xt 011.2 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. ORDER TO PREVENT PCELUTANTS FROM MAMNC THE SITE W. FORM WATR RUNOFF. oC»oo DENOTES EXISTING RETAINING WALL STORMWATER moo DENOTES PROPOSED RETAINING WALL FINAL GRADING OF THE LOT SHALL PROMOTE SHEET DONNING AND AVOO CDNCEN1N.;:_^N OF STORM WATER !LOWS ' NORTH PHIAL MAD NO SHALL MAINTAIN TIE EdEPNC STORM WATER DRAINAGE PATTERNS TO THE E,M,1 POSSBIx .:..^ NNACTCAL AS TO NOT CAUSE ANY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DENOTES EXISTING TREE D 2D I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. /A 1 JO HUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 8/19/13 Reg. No. 44655 DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED -.hW- DENOTES OVERHEAD WARE ->- DENOTES SANITARY SEWER ( IN FEE ) »-- DENOTES STORM SEWER f inch = 20fL ---- DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE FB/TUC DENOTES FULL BASEMENT/TUCK-UNDER GARAGE -6- DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE l� BENCHMARK Top nut of fire hydrant at SE quadrant of 58TH Street and Brookview Ave. Elev.=869.22 A 1 1 I L1J I 1 1 L1J 2im: 866.5 nv. 850.4 I I 1 I L1J PROPOSED ELEVATIONS -LOT 1 GARAGE FLOOR = 868.0 (Tuck -under) TOP OF BLOCK = 877.0 LOWEST FLOOR = 868.0 (9' COLING) FIRST FLOOR = 878.8 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS -LOT 2 GARAGE FLOOR = 869.0 (Tuck -under) TOP OF BLOCK = 877.0 LOWEST FLOOR = 869.0 (8' CEILING) FIRST FLOOR = 878.8 JOB #13448bs ACRE LAND SURVEII'ING E F Serving Twrt Cities Metro = ' ' " area and beyond III 763-458-2997 acrelandsurvey�gmail. ofn 10 11 I2 ID H la la P 1a IP. FID nl n2 11p n4 na Uta p7. pB I,B IZO 1..c)<81 :FB.-. N.- - 876.6 00 876.0 SPR 12 5 r 875.7 875.6 SPR 12 10 I ...........875•.. v 876.4 876.6 87j 876.4x SION CONTROL CONTACT: I . .P (,-I DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION ................. ...., 876.2x FB/TUC x875. .... (FFE=878.8) > DENOTES EXISTING RETAINING WALL > DENOTES PROPOSED RETAINING WALL F DENOTES EXISTING TREE OA x X.: I '. '•. - DENOTES SANITARY SEWER ( IN FEET ) 877.3 •' 124 MAPLE 24 876.1 875.2 : X 872.5 '. 865.8.x ASH •"'- i •'•. •'�, a $69:A :8 55.5 LO R :s r.-.-.-.-. -.-.-.-..-87&6��i�t�.-.-j. u 87.4.8 `. ^ 8 10 876.6 3Wy -' -` 8.72. 1 '. F .1 I 876.3 PINE 13 876.1 n BIRCH 12; 10 8 Q '•. _ APLE 12 876.5 x T I S o ' %. y I I FB/TUC FFE=878.8 ^ 67 :a oo 874. �I H 1..c)<81 :FB.-. N.- - 876.6 00 876.0 SPR 12 5 r 875.7 875.6 SPR 12 10 I ...........875•.. v 876.4 cpm 0" cpm. cPj 85� 8->0 865 SION CONTROL CONTACT: (,-I DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION ................. DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE 876.2x FB/TUC x875. .... (FFE=878.8) > DENOTES EXISTING RETAINING WALL 14 x 875:6' x 7 s S�-s s co u I J U � b L,s co -T 41 i i1 x 87:4 7 c�a o I co 874.8:' :10 :870.79869.2 69,35 'RW ly 00 . Q ;I a0' 1'0 00 ��"8 ''• CD 'R 82.9 S�R 14 1 �. S. y 06 5.7.' I 10 ^ - • RRY 2.5 868.1 X 871.6 a U ih r7 876.5 x In PROPOSED ELEVA BENCHMARK Top nut of fire hydrant at SE quadrant of 58TH Street and Brookview Ave. Elev.=869.22 GARAGE FLOOR = 86 TOP OF BLOCK = 87. LOWEST FLOOR = 861 FIRST FLOOR = 878.E PROPOSED ELEVA GARAGE FLOOR = 86 TOP OF BLOCK = 87' LOWEST FLOOR = 861, FIRST FLOOR = 878.E JOB #134 - DENOTES STORM SEWER ACRE LAND SURVEY DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE Serving Twin Cities Metro DENOTES FULL BASEMENT/TUCK-UNDER GARAGE area and beyond - DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE k1763 -4k% -M97 acrelandsury 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 00 117 02 113 114 ?013 10: 23am 875.8x X 873.8 8j I R•. SION CONTROL CONTACT: LEGEND DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE 1.2 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION. > DENOTES EXISTING RETAINING WALL > DENOTES PROPOSED RETAINING WALL NORTH DENOTES EXISTING TREE 0 20 DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED - DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE - DENOTES SANITARY SEWER ( IN FEET ) 1 inch - 20 ft co u I J U � b L,s co -T 41 i i1 x 87:4 7 c�a o I co 874.8:' :10 :870.79869.2 69,35 'RW ly 00 . Q ;I a0' 1'0 00 ��"8 ''• CD 'R 82.9 S�R 14 1 �. S. y 06 5.7.' I 10 ^ - • RRY 2.5 868.1 X 871.6 a U ih r7 876.5 x In PROPOSED ELEVA BENCHMARK Top nut of fire hydrant at SE quadrant of 58TH Street and Brookview Ave. Elev.=869.22 GARAGE FLOOR = 86 TOP OF BLOCK = 87. LOWEST FLOOR = 861 FIRST FLOOR = 878.E PROPOSED ELEVA GARAGE FLOOR = 86 TOP OF BLOCK = 87' LOWEST FLOOR = 861, FIRST FLOOR = 878.E JOB #134 - DENOTES STORM SEWER ACRE LAND SURVEY DENOTES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE Serving Twin Cities Metro DENOTES FULL BASEMENT/TUCK-UNDER GARAGE area and beyond - DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE k1763 -4k% -M97 acrelandsury 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 00 117 02 113 114 ?013 10: 23am 500 FOOT OVERLAP SKETCH FOR: Ridge Creek Custom Homes 0 120 (( IN FEET )) 1 inch = 120 Ft. *SEE ADD111ONAL SHEETS FOR LOT TABULATION* NORTH 11 (79) (80) p (81) 0 (82) (831 (8Q (85) (73) .. 4329 437 0�`13� 31g 4112 4308 0 l is m m I rn m b n 5 a, m Il(12) nl.l 6 (32) 5800 F A 58051150) % A (jj) 5804 R 45900 A 5804 A x ' (34) 5808 It 5609 u42s ! It A5905 Wx R (351 5812 R 8 -- (49I _a I x 138) 5816 8 j- 5817 i♦ as 9 (S7) 5820 5 9 l48) w]! x 5625 (17) 3 ma R (3�i 5824 it „ 5829, (100♦♦ x (39) 5828 x L44VI('.40 ___ '.• A � 5832 9 (4q - 5837,15836 (45) '(71) _ 1 91) R (101) n 5840 R (12) 6�" +f441 3, A (43) 5844 9 5821 IB) } 1'5821 15820" A" } 95825 R I (5' � .I 1 (106) 1107)4?04 t=" 5829 ,J A C25) ----------- 4400 4328 X324 4520 416 i512 408 4504 <2101 r- (tej 5832 z Q 5833 �i 8 9 (yql I 1A. (13710 MR(3) x.,3 9. i 1 1 " 5837 (23) (19) 5838 tJ+fl :lu q� 5801 (51) Il(12) nl.l 6 (32) 5800 F A 58051150) % A (jj) 5804 R 45900 A 5804 A x ' (34) 5808 It 5609 u42s ! It A5905 Wx R (351 5812 R 8 -- (49I _a I x 138) 5816 8 j- 5817 i♦ as 9 (S7) 5820 5 9 l48) w]! x 5625 (17) 3 ma R (3�i 5824 it „ 5829, (100♦♦ x (39) 5828 x (I6) ___ '.• A � 5832 9 (4q - 5837,15836 (45) '(71) _ 1 91) R (101) n 5840 R (12) 6�" +f441 3, A (43) 5844 9 IM -____ -- - I R It it 5801 l lit) 1111) 5800 $ 5807 (10) J.c10-a-se! j 3 5845 - _____-/ -________.__I .$901",N.,3.aui- 4 (124) n 1 ,u.11 • }1'I flit 1 A ,. AUG 0 3 2013 1 hereby certify that this plan, sketch or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. AP. —SHUA P. SCHNEIDER Dote: -ti -02-13 Reg. No. 44655 CRE LAND SURVEYING Blaine, MN 55449Ilt 763_=-6778 js.acrelandaurveyc�gmail.com h, U Il(12) '(g) % 45900 A 5804 A it (1 i0),% (98)9) ! It A5905 j oa:. ♦ (119) x ,xll ♦♦ (99) 5904 9 I i♦ as W♦ 5908 8 15813 s,22s 5812 A (its) (100♦♦ °: 1 ___ '.• A � 5912 R ♦� t '(71) _ 1 I27) (101) J.c10-a-se! j 3 5845 - _____-/ -________.__I .$901",N.,3.aui- 4 (124) n 1 ,u.11 • }1'I flit 1 A ,. AUG 0 3 2013 1 hereby certify that this plan, sketch or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. AP. —SHUA P. SCHNEIDER Dote: -ti -02-13 Reg. No. 44655 CRE LAND SURVEYING Blaine, MN 55449Ilt 763_=-6778 js.acrelandaurveyc�gmail.com h, U Il(12) '(g) 5805. 130 5804 A R 5805 A ! It 58091(29) R (13) 5808 580x, 15813 s,22s 5812 ' 1' „____�X °: 1 ___ '.• A � i5817(7) R•�, t '(71) _ 1 I27) (15)5816 5821 IB) } 1'5821 15820" A" } 95825 R I (5' � .I 1 t=" 5829 ,J A C25) ----------- 15 (77) 5828 4-2 ,182 R t5: 5829 5833 .J Rg • / (tej 5832 z Q 5833 �i 8 9 (yql I 1A. (13710 MR(3) x.,3 9. i 1 1 " 5837 (23) (19) 5838 tJ+fl Q O R 5837 ».v R 5841! (2) R w IB x_e R; »en I J+l1 A (m Ito) 5840 F 3 5841 9(21) m eo 5844 5. R 1�) u A J.c10-a-se! j 3 5845 - _____-/ -________.__I .$901",N.,3.aui- 4 (124) n 1 ,u.11 • }1'I flit 1 A ,. AUG 0 3 2013 1 hereby certify that this plan, sketch or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. AP. —SHUA P. SCHNEIDER Dote: -ti -02-13 Reg. No. 44655 CRE LAND SURVEYING Blaine, MN 55449Ilt 763_=-6778 js.acrelandaurveyc�gmail.com h, U 500 FT STUDY 8/2/2013 5820 Brookview Ave., EDINA By: Joshua Schneider, Peterson PROPERTY; Acre Land Surveying, Inc. FAIRFAX, HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA RLS#44655 LOT LOT LOT STREET ADDRESS NAME WIDTH (FT) AREA ISF DEPTH(FT) 58th St. W. 4304 Iwanin 75.0 9,370 125.0 58th St. W. 4308 Anderson 75.0 9,370 125.0 58th St. W. 4312 Probst 75.0 9,370 125.0 58th St. W. 4316 Figarelia et al 75.0 9,370 125.0 58th St. W. 4320 Arrieta et al {' i 75.0 9,370 125.0 58th St. W. 4324 Thompson ^IV80.0 9,995 125.0 58th St. W. 4328 Luskin .1 80.0 9,995 125.0 58th St. W. 4400 Sitek 80.0 9,995 125.0 58th St. W. 4404 Lindgren 80.0 9,995 125.0 58th St. W. 4408 Holst & Nissen 80.0 9,995 125.0 58th St. W. 4412 Bestrom 80.0 9,995 125.0 Brookview Ave. 5800 Glatzel 48.4 6,505 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5801 Kingston 48.4 6,509 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5804 Rehm & Johnson 50.0 6,725 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5805 Caron 50.0 6,723 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5808 Johnson 50.0 6,724 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5809 Goldberg 75.0 10,084 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5812 Berscheid 50.0 6,723 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5816 Raichert 50.0 6,723 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5817 Hultmann & Bates 75.0 10,082 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5820 Peterson etas 100.0 13,444 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5821 Duquette 50.0 6,721 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5825 Storey 50.0 6,720 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5828 Koktavy 50.0 6,721 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5829 Chamberlin & Oberstar 49.9 6,720 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5832 Heath 50.0 6,721 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5833 Lapensky 49.9 6,719 134.3 Brookview Ave. 5836 Yannapoulou 50.0 6,720 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5837 Hurley 50.0 6,718 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5840 Braun 50.0 6,719 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5841 Grage 50.0 6,718 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5844 Bergren 50.0 6,719 134.2 Brookview Ave. 5845 Sullivan 80.0 10,747 134.2 Kellogg Ave. 5801 Wallen 48.5 6,532 134.3 Kellogg Ave. 5805 Jacobson 50.0 6,728 134.3 Kellogg Ave. 5809 Engbretson & Pratt 100.0 13,453 134.3 Kellogg Ave. 5817 Aksamit etal 100.0 13,450 134.2 Kellogg Ave. 5825 Miller 50.0 6,724 134.2 Kellogg Ave. 5829 Phernetton et al 75.0 10,084 134.2 Kellogg Ave. 5837 Cowan 75.0 10,083 134.2 Kellogg Ave. 5845 Hee-yoon & Young Kim Trustee 100.0 13,441 134.2 Kellogg Ave. 5901 Fisher 48.5 6,522 134.1 Kellogg Ave. 5905 Nrfp Holdings Ilc 50.0 6,718 134.1 Oaklawn Ave. 5905 Amundson 20.0 1,700 85.0 Oaklawn Ave. 5800 Dekleyn & Gerring 48.5 6,527 134.3 Oaklawn Ave. 5801 Jahn 48.5 6,520 134.3 Oaklawn Ave. 5804 Schill & Sheehan 50.0 6,727 134.3 Oaklawn Ave. 5805 Bergman 50.0 6,726 134.3 Oaklawn Ave. 5808 Stasney 50.0 6,726 134.3 Oaklawn Ave. 5809 King etal 50.0 6,725 134.3 Oaklawn Ave. 5812 Fleming & Scholes 50.0 6,725 134.3 Oaklawn Ave. 5813 Begley 60.0 8,067 134.3 Oaklawn Ave. 5816 King' 50.0 6,724 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5817 Everist 60.0 8,066 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5820 Bergseth 50.0 6,724 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5821 Olson & Stanislav 60.0 8,077 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5824 Hook 50.0 6,723 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5828 Schlecht & Erickson 50.0 6,722 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5829 Fraser trustee 60.0 8,053 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5832 Dick 50.0 6,721 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5833 Regan 60.0 8,075 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5836 Schleimer trustee 50.0 6,721 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5837 Mitchell 50.0 6,721 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5840 Kleinjan 50.0 6,720 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5841 Sandberg 115.0 15,438 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5844 Beson 50.0 6,719 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5900 Aura 48.5 6,517 134.1 Oaklawn Ave. 5901 Learn 63.5 8,547 134.2 Oaklawn Ave. 5904 Parker 50.0 6,717 134.1 Oaklawn Ave. 5905 Amundson etal 50.0 6,718 134.1 Oaklawn Ave. 5908 Ideal Apartments Ilc 50.0 6,716 134.1 Oaklawn Ave. 5912 Kaiser 50.0 6,715 134.1 Oaklawn Ave. 59XX Hennepin County -Forfeited 40.0 5,017 125.4 Philbrook Ln. 4200 Stussy 75.0 9,311 125.0 Philbrook Ln. 4201 Engelke 81.4 9,568 125.0 Philbrook Ln. 4308 Egger 80.0 10,003 125.0 Philbrook Ln. 4312 Swoap 80.0 10,003 125.0 Philbrook Ln. 4316 Brown 80.0 10,002 125.0 Philbrook Ln. 4320 Jacobs 80.0 10,002 125.0 Philbrook Ln. 4324 Jchang & Orr 80.0 10,002 125.0 Philbrook Ln. 4328 Miller 80.0 10,001 125.0 MEAN 61.7 8098.1 131.3 81 Total MEDIAN 50.0 6725.0 134.2 AUG 0 3 ?013 h 10-1- i J_q—t '1 1 ii,\' , ♦ JLAm� 111! � Y��`� ( -�I■ .•s _`^R � 1� ..1 �. ulu ul` •� .■e�41 +j ��■;i^ y�/_i •�►ti ..11 K9 R4 lu 1' 1 nuu t IU'llt�l�le ■■ i' Jl �' r � • r�. t—rl t+ 7 •1 _ • * 1 meow.✓- f :�iT{{"tt,.��i I.1r9 1{ Ilr ■. (= �.i■IL� �� i.1► �• «P 1 , I i►/.ai�� ♦_ i ` . ■IIII�I■1 ` . i �,��,6y � � ti -1 ♦�a�- '`\�rl�. bi LI1._ /I��i1111i � ��;��.: ,r i � . � ♦{��1�<h>1r1 ^ ♦ ii Ii mo�.,. � � � .,.:� . '.��M/�...11 ■■�I�.rr//! . ,� N.1/2 SE. 114 SEC 19 T. 028 R. 24 4 g e H - (Bq (ofl (aq C9n (oW (e9) (too) Rol) (tom) (Ala) V/ t V;) R06) RDi) 'i t7 �7.x � �rxj7p .H0 Ie UI+! t 58TH ST W + 58TH ST W R� Isi) i (53) R fes) taq A � R Y ISq A R ij R tsu 4 IUV t 3 tm e ts% Y vo) R lNa R x MUM wa A fag 7 ( E ,AI a ' R RA (its) Rae) 144 a („) R (1171 A lai'p t. to wa ..it R02) RA A 1411 A RI. RO s a � w,H Ig fW ° a. 4 IUV t py A w Y vo) i Clio) MUM faq 1-1)a E ,AI a ` a (its) Rae) " (1171 Itet) R w.l a R A RQ ..it R02) %\V RO s a R9 R 'a• Pl R A +110q A (tq) E A i R (I taJ is)a RH) W9 x (aq x :(tgwa RoA t wn (tm) (top IaV S ti (to) R A x (7% (ti) (3)` it a i (DA 4 n 1 x�T-Y • t 59TH ST W r (n (7n (79 na A (7p (7q R i7p A (� A (� A (sto R !s<) a i nnaw++ 11311 w.R w.ls 1 R a " i ' a (123)` (161) I LIP to (172) IsI.H ' a � A 7i • � a 1 1 r 1 , ;17 I .� H • 1 1 i w .{ 7 E i, Is • A 1 1 1 0 H M ST W N.112 SE. 114 SEC. 19 T.028 R24 rded map. It represents tion and data from city, 8:38:15 2009 zoo 4.0 FaAt S/NW/19 SINE/19 S/NWI. w.0 wH Clio) MUM S/SWI H+ nn E (its) Rae) " (1171 Itet) R w.l a R . R (Ilq R02) +110q A (tq) R (I taJ ROat RH) ((oi7 x Piot RoA t R (tm) (top i nnaw++ 11311 w.R w.ls 1 R a " i ' a (123)` (161) I LIP to (172) IsI.H ' a � A 7i • � a 1 1 r 1 , ;17 I .� H • 1 1 i w .{ 7 E i, Is • A 1 1 1 0 H M ST W N.112 SE. 114 SEC. 19 T.028 R24 rded map. It represents tion and data from city, 8:38:15 2009 zoo 4.0 FaAt S/NW/19 SINE/19 S/NWI. N/S1V/1 N/SWI S/SW/19 MUM S/SWI 0 Eight /Quarter/Section City Hall - Phone 952-927.8861 Fax 952-826-0389 - www.CityofEcrina.com Date: September 25, 2013 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 3655 Hazelton Road MEMO The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the property at 3655 Hazelton Road. (See property location on pages Al A2.) The proposal is to tear down the existing vacant restaurant and construct a two-story bank on the site. The applicant would seek a Site Plan review and potentially a variance to develop the site. The applicant is proposing three alternatives for the Planning Commission to consider and provide feedback prior to an official application. Option B would not require any variances as proposed. Options A and C would both require building setback variances. The compliance table below demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the current zoning of PCD -3: * Variance required City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 City Standard PCD -3 Option'A Option B Option C Building Setbacks North 50 feet 50 feet 95 feet 50 feet South 50 feet 100+ feet 100+ feet 100+ feet East 50 feet 75 feet 55 feet 75 feet West 50 feet 30 feet* 60 feet 30 feet* Parkins Lot/Drive Aisle Setbacks North 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet South 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet East 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet West 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet * Variance required City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 MEMO O e As demonstrated above, Option B is a code compliant site plan. TRAFFICISITE ACCESS A traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. Access would be obtained from the access road provided as part of the adjacent redevelopment of the Byerly's site. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS Staff has encouraged the applicant to design the site with emphasis on pedestrian connections to Hazelton Road, the Promenade and the new Byerly's site development. While sidewalk connection would be provided to each; however, connections to the north, south and east to the Promenade, would require crossing an automobile drive -aisle or parking lot. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard Option Option B Option C PCD -3 A Building Height 8 stories or 96 feet 2 stories 2 stories 2 stories whichever is less Maximum Floor Area 50% 15% 15% 15% Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls 47 47 47 48 Parking Stall Size 9x18 9x20 9x20 9x20 Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet Stacking Spaces 3 3+ 3+ 3+ As demonstrated above, Option B is a code compliant site plan. TRAFFICISITE ACCESS A traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. Access would be obtained from the access road provided as part of the adjacent redevelopment of the Byerly's site. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS Staff has encouraged the applicant to design the site with emphasis on pedestrian connections to Hazelton Road, the Promenade and the new Byerly's site development. While sidewalk connection would be provided to each; however, connections to the north, south and east to the Promenade, would require crossing an automobile drive -aisle or parking lot. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Inter-,a__ a Property Mas Map 4 ti r 1 s u� NHEaRYUk f i ` 70TH 5T 1L I_ �� ► I o ..----a— Sout * IeLibrarySouthdaleS6MceCenter Ulldlf1DR W r G w u 2- HZEL(�OPI w f m t 73NDSTLS+ _.., ____---- pi P^R�OCMENADE ._ w; (y „ ,� •t (iia 3 "' � � ; ITT i *11M i l9; f # 1.V W PARKIAWN AL, E { i! est sr t Parcel 32-028-24-22-0008 Map Scale:1 = 800 ft. N ID: Print Date: 9/17/2013 Owner Name: prematane Wolfson Et Al Parcel 3655 Hazelton Rd Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Commercial -Preferred Type: Home- Non -Homestead stead: Parcel 1.4 acres Area: 60,974 sq ft I Sale Code: /-�` This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT® HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page 1 of 1 13 September 2013 City of Edina Community Development Attn: Cary Teague—Community Development Director 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 Ph. (952) 826-0389 Re: Think Mutual Bank Proposed Edina Branch Facility 3655 Hazelton Road Edina, Minnesota Subject: Sketch Plan Review Submittal Below is a brief summary of the proposed building design, image, and material selection. General. Think Mutual Bank is proposing to construct a new partial two-story facility located at 3655 Hazelton Road. The existing property is currently zoned PCD -3 Planned Commercial District 3. A financial Institution is allowed under this zoning. The existing property is currently contains a vacant restaurant building, which win be demolished. The proposed 9AW square foot building win consist of an approximately 5,800 square feet main level and an approximately 3,600 square foot upper level. The main level will contain the Bank's retail banking space (which Includes offices, teller areas, conference room, waiting, etc.). The partial upper level will contain a community room/training room, storage, restrooms, employee lounge and a rooftop patio. Both site ingress/egress is from one curb cut onto an Access Road (via Hazelton Road). This access road currently does not exist, but will be constructed as the result of the new Bylery's Development ongoing to the west of this property. Site Plan Layouts There are (3) site plan layouts that have been submitted for consideration. A The proposed building Is located in the northwest corner on the site with customer parking on the east side of the building. The main building entry is in the northeast corner of the proposed building (faces east). Think Mutual Bank is proposing a four -lane drive -up; located on the south side of the building. Each drive -up lane provides the required 3 -car stacking. Employee parking is located on the south side of the drive -up. Tl* bullding does not meet Widing setback requirements at the north & west property ((nes. However, this option pushes the building as close to Hazalton as possible. A total of 47 parking stalls are shown on the site. Based on the size of the building; 47 parking stalls are required. Options The proposed building is centered on the site with customer parking on the north side of the building. The main building entry is In the northeast corner of the proposed building (faces east). Think Mutual Bank is proposing a four -lane drive -up, located on the south side of the building. Each drive -up lane provides the required 3 -car stacking. Employee parking is located on the south side of the drive -up. The building in this option does conform to the building setbacks. A total of 3$ parking stens are shown on the site. Baud on the size of the buNdhtg; 47 parkfn�04A11 wl{l be requited. Werealize that at this time, we do not meet the parking' requirements. r43 WC 9/16113 HTG ARCHITECTS 9300 Hennepin Town Road, Minneapolis MN 55347 (952) 278-8880 htg-architects.com MINNEAPOLIS PHOENIX TAMPA Option C The proposed building is located in the northwest corner on the site with customer parking on the east side of the building. The main building entry is in the northeast corner of the proposed building (faces east). Think Mutual Bank is proposing a four -lane drive -up; located on the south side of the building. Each drive -up lane provides the required 3 -car stacking. Employee parking is located on the east side of the drive -up. This option is very similar to Option A except that the drive -up In Option C is ahead-on'type layout. This allows us to simplify and clean up the site circulation. -The,building does not meet building setback requirements at the north & west property 11nes. Hower, this option hushes the building as dose to Hazelton as possible. A total of 48 parking stalls are shown on the site. Based on the size of the building, 47 parking stalls are required. Signage. A proposed pylon sign Is shown in the northwest corner of the site (see site plan). The pylon sign design is meant to compliment the proposed building design. The sign structure is, at this time, clad in the same metal materials as the building. The Think Mutual Bank logo sign is individually backlit letters applied to blue composite metal panels. The size of the sign is yet to be determined- but will be sized to meet City Code. Two backlit signs are are proposed to be installed on the building; one on each side of Think's blue slab wall. One sign shall be on the east side of the wall; the second sign will be on the west side of the wall. A third wall sign shall be located on the west side of the building tin the southwest corner). Sizes shall meet City Code. Sign permits will be applied for by the Owner's signage vendor at a later date. Image. The design of the proposed building provides an image that is consumer friendly, warm, and elegant. The exterior materials reflect Think Mutual Bank's corporate branding standards and are similar to their established prototype. The main entry is marked by the blue accent wall in the northeast corner of the building. The exterior design uses three materials: preflnished composite metal wall panels, glass/spandrel glass, and clay tile. The colors used are: blue composite panels, silver metallic composite panels, and a salmon color clay tile. Aluminum frames are clear anodized (silver) with the glass having a slight gray tint. The mechanical equipment will be located on the roof and be screened by the building parapet. Materials. Building Entry Walls Prefinished composite metal panels (blue) Building Facade Glass curtain wall and terra-cotta / clay tile Roof/canopy overhangs Prefinished composite metal panels (silver) Roof EPDM Roofing Roof Structure Steel decking on bar Joists Floor Structure Concrete slab -on -grade Wall Structure Metal/steel stud framing with steel columns/beams The use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of the other properties. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development of the surrounding properties. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, etc. will be provided for this proposed building. The commercial use of this building is not in conflict with the city's comprehensive plan of this site. The preliminary schedule is for construction to begin in April of 2014 with an anticipated completion date in the December of 2014. We feel the proposed Think Mutual Bank project will be and remain a tremendous asset to the neighborhood. Enclosed you will find the architectural site plan, preliminary exterior 3d renderings, and photos of Thinws past prototype building projects. Please call me with any questions. Sincerely, Russ Schramm Project Manager HTG ARCHITECTS 9300 Hennepin Town Road Minneapolis MN 55347 (952) 278-8880 www.htg-architects.com MINNEAPOLIS PHOENIX TAMPA A3 51TE PLAN NOfE5: TOTAL BUILDING 50. FT.: MAIN LEVEL: 5,800 S.F. UPPER LEVEL: 3,600 S.F. TOTAL: 4,400 S.F. PARKING: 1:200 REQUIRED: 41 STALLS SH": 41 STALLS TOTAL LOT AREA : 60990 S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 500 S.F. if, fri/p/.//MrA _ HAZELTON ROAD A$ s:�r: TH/NKMUTUAL BANK 9300 Hennepin Town Road PROJECT#:.131145 Minneapolis, MN. 55347 Al'a DATE 9-13-13 PROPOSEDNEWBU/LD/NG Tel: 952.278.8880 archl�� ED/NaAAlVNESOM I Fax: 952.278.8822 � SITE FLAN NOTES: TOTAL BUILDIN6 50. FT.: MAIN LEVEL, 5000 5F. UPPER LEVEL, 3,600 5F. TOTAL, q,400 5F. PARKIN& 1:200 REOUIRED, 41 STALL5 5HOWN: 41 STALL5 TOTAL LOT AREA : 60990 5.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 5,800 S.F. -------------+------+ ------------------------ -- HAZELTON ROAD /-T-, 51TE PLAN - OPTION,� W SHEET: I THINKMUTUAL BANK 9300 Hennepin Town Road. PROJECT #: 131145 Minneapolis, MN. 55347 Al.b DATE: 9-13-13 PROPOSED NEWBUILDING Tel: 952.278.8880 ard,itecEb EDIA(A MINNESOTA I Fax: 952.278.8822 wawhEgad,Mnsmm 51TE PLAN NOTE5: TOTAL BUILDING 50. FT.: MAIN LEVEL: 5,800 S.F. UPPER LEVEL: 3,6(10 S.F. TOTAL: 9,400 S.F. PARKIN& 1:200 'REQUIRED: 41 STALLS SHOWN: 48 STALLS TOTAL LOT AREA: 60,990 S.F. . BUILDING FOOTPRINT, 5,800 S.F. HAZELTON ROAD 10, I I I I gjl'") PM. THINKMUTUAL BANK 9300 Hennepin Town Road PROJECT #: 131145 Minneapolis, MN. 55347 A1.c DATE: 9-13-13 PROPOSEDNEWBUILDING Tel: 952.278.8880 ��•«s fDIM4 MINNESOTA I Fax: 952.278.8822 n VA(lavic kelvirM Think Mutual Bank co 0 uj 4 1 I I �61 I Think Mutual Bank Planning Commission 2014 Annual Work Plan 2014 New Initiative Target Completion Date Budget Required Staff Support Required Council Approval A. Zoning Ordinance Amendments (See On-going No additional Yes, staff support is Council approval is required attached Zoning Ordinance Work Plan budget requested required for each Zoning Ordinance Tracker.)The Planning Commission would at this time amendment like to complete the following from the list in 2014: 1. Sign Plan Sign Ordinance 2014 30 Hours 2. Parking regulations/Proof-of-parking 2014 30 Hours 3. Max./min.size for Apts. & Senior Housing 2014 10 hours 4. Lighting/Noise Regulations 2014 20 hours B. Polity Recommendations 2014 No additional Yes, staff support is Council approval is required 1. Sustainability enforcement/PUD/Ped. budget requested required friendly/affordable housing at this time 2. Tree Ordinance/Landscaping 3. Mid Term Comp. Plan Consideration C. Commission Liaison On-going 1. Connectivity — Living Streets 2. France Avenue Corridor Planning 3. Mpls. 44/France Small Area Plan 4. GrandView Next Steps D. Small Area Plan - Conduct a Small Area 2014-15 $25,000-$75,000 Yes, staff support is Council approval is required Plan for the Wooddale and Valley View depending on the required Commercial area as defined in the scope of work to be Comprehensive Plan. done by a consultant. Progress Report: The Planning Commission is responsible to review all Land Use applications submitted to the City of Edina. Land Use applications include: Variances; Site Plan Review; Sketch Plan Review; Conditional Use Permits; Subdivision; Lot Line Adjustments; Rezoning; and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. To accomplish this responsibility the Planning Commission meets twice per month, on the second and fourth Wednesday of the month. The Planning Commission typically reviews 3-4 of the above requests each agenda. Proposed Month for Joint Work Session: Council Comments: