HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987 07-29 HPB Meeting Minutes RegularA G E N D A
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1987, AT 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
I. Approval of the Minutes: May 26, 1987
II. Recent U.S. Surpreme Court decisions on Land Use
Regulations
III. Permit for Modification:
Grange Hall, 1879, 4912 Eden Avenue
IV. Building Plan Review:
Referred from Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Mark Haymaker, 4605 Edina Boulevard
V. Southdale Shopping Center (1956)
VI. Status report = current projects
a. Edina Theatre, 3911 West 50th Street
b. West 50th Street construction
C. Odd Fellows Hall, 4388 France Avenue South
d. Edina Centennial
VII. Other Business:
VIII. Next Meeting Date: August 25, 1987 at 7:30 p.m.
IX. Adjournment
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, JULY 28, 1987 AT 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MANAGERS CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
OTHERS PRESENT:
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chairman Gordon Stuart, Cy Stuppy,
Gary Nyberg and John Metil
David Gepner, Donald Wray and Lois
Wilder
Harold Sand
Mark and Kim Haymaker, 4605 Edina
Boulevard
Arthur Schmidt, 4611 Edina Boulevard
Mr. Stuppy moved approval of the May 26, 1987 minutes. Mr.
Nyberg seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Mr. Stuart suggested that item No. IV on the agenda should
be considered at this time because Mr. and Mrs. Haymaker were
present.
IV. Building Plan Review: 4605 Edina Boulevard
Mr. Sand said that the property is classified a pivotal
structure contributing to the significance of the Edina Country
Club District which is listed in the National Register of
Historic Places. The plans were referred to the Heritage
Preservation Board for a recommendation on the design of the
proposed modifications. The plans are currently pending before
the Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments for a zoning
variance. However, Mr. Haymaker submitted survey information
that indicates a front yard variance may not be necessary. This
information was submitted today and the staff has not reviewed it
for accuracy.
Mr. Sand introduced Mr. Mark Haymaker, of 4605 Edina
Boulevard, proponent in the case. Mr. Haymaker explained that
there were a number of problems with the existing home that they
wanted to correct. They hired an architect, James Cooperman to
investigate the problems and design a solution that preserves the
historic character of the neighborhood. The problems include an
inadequate roof structure, problems with leakage and a small
bathroom for the master bedroom. Mr. Cooperman examined the roof
and recommended a new roof structure with a steeper pitch to
handle the roof loads. The plans were changed to a Federal
revival style because that was considered appropriate with the
new roof pitch. He requested that Mr. Cooperman attend this
meeting but he was unable to attend. Mr. Nyberg expressed
concern about the change in the facade and suggested the
modifications could be accomplished in a Mediterranean or Spanish
Colonial Revival style to match the existing design. Mr. Metil
suggested investigating plans that would preserve the existing
facade of the dwelling and confine the modifications to the
interior or a small addition in the rear.
Mr. Arthur Schmidt Jr. 4611 Edina Boulevard supported Mr.
Haymaker's reconstruction plans and said there was no quota on
the number of Mediterranean style dwellings that are required in
the neighborhood. The project can only increase the value of the
house.
Mr. Haymaker expressed concern about the City's lack of
regard for the historic district when Wooddale School was
demolished. Mr. Haymaker requested conceptual approval tonight
that would allow him to return to the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments at the next meeting. He wished to have approval
before August 12, 1987 when a previous variance expires. Mr.
Nyberg said that the addition could be accomplished in a
Mediterranean style, however, the Board would have to review
revised plans before a recommendation can be made. After
additional discussion, Mr. Nyberg moved denial of the design
presented. The proponent may return with revised plans in the
Mediterranean style which retains the ornamental iron and plaster
molding decoration that is consistent with the period and the
existing dwelling. The clay the roof should be retained with
the existing pitch or a pitch midway between that and the roof
proposed today. The patio would be an enhancement to the front
of the house. The motion was seconded by Mr. Metil. All voted
aye. The motion carried. the Board discussed possible meeting
dates for review of the revised plans including the next regular
meeting or a special meeting.
III. Permit for Modification: Grange Hall, 1879, 4912 Eden
Avenue
Mr. Sand said that the Edina Park and Recreation Department
requests a permit to replace the door on the north side of the
Grange Hall due to deterioration of the existing door. The new
door is proposed to be windowless to avoid problems with glass
breakage. The property is zoned Heritage Preservation District
therefore a permit is required for the change. The Grange Hall
was constructed in 1879 at the south east corner of Wooddale
Avenue and West 50th Street. The building was moved in 1935 to a
location slightly west of its present location. At this time, a
basement was installed and the entrance on the north wall added
to provide access to the basement. The building was moved again
in 1970 to accommodate Highway 100 construction.
Inspection of the door jamb indicates the original door was
replaced possibly with a used door because the hinges were
relocated and the area patched.
The staff recommends replacement of the door with a new door
that matches the front door of the Grange Hall. The front door
was replaced in 1970 and fabricated by Roland Milwork Co. in
Minneapolis and the same company should fabricate the new door
for the north wall.
Mr. Nyberg moved approval of the permit in accordance with
the staff recommendation. Mr. Stuppy seconded the motion. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
V. Southdale
The Board briefly discussed potential changes to Southdale.
Mr. Nyberg suggested the board should pursue protection of the
Garden Court. No action taken.
The Board generally agreed to skip the remainder of the
Agenda due to the late hour.
VIII. Next Meeting Date:
August 25, 1987 at 7:30 P.M.
IX. Adjournment
Mr. Stuppy moved to adjourn at 10:15 p.m. Mr. Metil
seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Harold Sand