Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016-03-15 City Council Regular Meeting
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, March 15, 2016 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval of Meeting Agenda IV.Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes Of March 2, 2016 Work Session and March 2, 2016 Regular Council Meeting B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 2/25/2016 TOTAL: $475,503.96 And Per Pre-List Dated 3/03/2016 TOTAL: $836,236.57 C.Request For Purchase - Braemar Golf Course - Toro 3150 Greensmaster D.Request for Purchase - Braemar Golf Course – Toro Groundsmaster 4500 E.Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-1 Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane Roundabout F.Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-2 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction G.Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-6 Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane Roundabout Landscaping H.Resolution No. 2016-34 Support for GreenCorp Grant Application I.Request for Purchase - Utility Excavator, Public Works - Utility J.Request for Purchase - Volvo L9OH Wheel Loader, Public Works - Streets K.Request for Purchase - 2016 TORO 3500 Lawn Mower, Public Works - Park Maintenance L.TraDc Safety Report of February 3, 2016 M.Resolution 2016-37 Approving Hennepin County Funds for 3330 West 66th Street N.2016-2017 Union Contract for Teamsters Local 320 - Police ODcers O.City Manager Employment Agreement- First Amendment V.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Update B.Speak Up, Edina February Discussion VI.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staF members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eDcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2016-36 Subdivision of 7600 Metro Boulevard for Edina Public Schools. B.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2016-32 & 2016-33 Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Rezoning for properties at the northwest corner of 66th and York. DLC Residential LLC. VII.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staF for consideration at a future meeting. VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Ordinance 2016-03 Amending Chapter 24-258 B.Pickleball Court Donation, Rosland Park, Resolution No. 2016-35 C.Request for Purchase, Rosland Park Pickleball Courts, McNamara Construction D.Resolution Nol. 2016-38 Accepting Various Donations IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Advisory Communication, Energy & Environment Commission: Green Purchasing Policy B.Correspondence C.Minutes 1.Park Board Meeting, February 9, 2016 2.Planning Commission Meeting, February 10, 2016 X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor and Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments XIII.Schedule of Upcoming Meetings, Dates Events as of March 15, 2016 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliLcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Debra Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes Of March 2, 2016 Work Session and March 2, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Minutes of Work Session, March 2, 2016 Revised Draft Minutes of March 2, 2016 Regular Meeting MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 2 2016 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 5:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering rollcall was: Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager, and Jessica Van Der Werff, Water Resources Coordinator. MILL POND – AQUATIC VEGETATION MANAGEMENT POLICY REVIEW Jessica Van Der Werff, Water Resources Coordinator, explained how the City of Edina began managing the aquatic vegetation for the Edina Mill Pond in 1980, how the process began to be specially assessed and how the cost sharing was developed. She explained the harvesting of the weeds was contracted for by the city, but regulated by the DNR and Minnehaha Watershed District. Ms. Van Der Werff noted staff has surveyed the residents in the Mill Pond and met with residents to ascertain their expectations. She explained suggested changes to the cost sharing of the weed management based on staff review and a survey of Mill Pond residents. Ms. Van Der Werff suggested that the Mill Pond be included in the Lake and Pond Policy which would require the residents to formalize as an association in order to continue to be eligible for elective services from the City. The Council gave staff direction to proceed with the amendment to the policy encompassing the proposed changes. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY REVISIONS Chad Millner, Director of Engineering, reviewed proposed changes to the City’s Special Assessment Policy. Mr. Millner noted the City had two policies, one relating to Minnesota State Aid Streets and a local assessment policy. He requested direction from the council in four areas: 1) combine the two nearly identical policies into one policy; 2) re-insert decorative street lighting into the assessment policy; 3) insert the Land Use Class table into the policy to document the calculation of REU’s used to calculate assessment costs; 4) revise the church REU values to 0.2 REU’s per 1000 square feet; 5) calculate corner lot REU’s based on 1 divided by the number of adjacent streets; and 6) institute the proposed changes to calculations, from the updated policy beginning with the 2017 construction projects. Council directed Mr. Millner to update the policy per his recommendations and placed the updated policy on a future regular meeting agenda for action. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 15, 2016. Minutes/Edina City Council Work Session/October 6, 2015 2 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 REVISED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 2, 2016 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of February 17, 2016 and closed meeting minutes of February 24, 2016 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated February 11, 2016, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $398,549.35; Police Special Revenue $450.00; Working Capital Fund $149,992.94; PIR Construction Fund $6,454.86; Equipment Replacement Fund $840.00; Cando Fund $6,490.00; Art Center Fund $5,548.26; Golf Dome Fund $2,230.79; Aquatic Center Fund $306.25; Golf Course Fund $11,153.13; Ice Arena Fund $25,066.33; Sports Dome Fund $61,545.28; Edinborough Park Fund $5,392.69; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,182.99; Liquor Fund $222,521.59; Utility Fund $211,971.32; Storm Sewer Fund $12,832.70; PSTF Agency Fund $6,022.12; Centennial TIF District $9,703.60; Grandview TIF District $11,296.10; TOTAL $1,150,550.30 and for receipt of payment of claims dated February 18, 2016, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $181,907.04; Police Special Revenue $308.81; Working Capital Fund $36,237.08; Art Center Fund $8,313.95; Golf Dome Fund $89.24; Aquatic Center Fund $868.94; Golf Course Fund $51,582.76; Ice Arena Fund $16,216.61; Sports Dome Fund $79,993.35; Edinborough Park Fund $2,342.60; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,972.81; Liquor Fund $196,066.97; Utility Fund $466,504.08; Storm Sewer Fund $1,282.77; Recycling Fund $37,184.67; PSTF Agency Fund $3,169.39; Payroll Fund $10,900.60; TOTAL $1,387,012.59; and, Credit Card Transactions dated October 26 – November 25, 2015; TOTAL $42,329.06 IV.C. Approve Encroachment Agreement between City of Edina and Tony and Elizabeth Burger at 6629 West Shore Drive IV.D. Approve Mental Health and Wellness Agreement with Edina Public Schools IV.E. Approve On-Sale Intoxicating, Club On-Sale, Sunday Sale, Wine and Beer Liquor License Renewals Minutes/Edina City Council/March 2, 2016 Page 2 IV.F. Approve Board and Commission Resignations and Alternate Member Appointments as follows: accept the resignation of Krishnan Ramashwamy from the Community Health Commission; accept the resignation of Daniel Li from the Arts and Culture Commission; appoint Connie Weston to the Community Health Commission with a term expiring March 1, 2018; and, appoint Stella Chaffee to the Arts and Culture Commission with a term expiring March 1, 2017. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Mayor Hovland acknowledged the attendance of the Valley View Government Class. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC HEARING: ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-31 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2016-28 ADOPTED Engineering Director Presentation Engineer Millner explained that the alley between West 55th and West 56th Streets and Xerxes and York Avenues was petitioned for reconstruction (A-257). The alley to the north, between West 54th and West 55th Streets (A-258), was in similar condition so staff reconstructed both alleys in 2014. Mr. Millner noted this item had been overlooked and presented the project history, updates, and assessment costs. For Project A-257, the total assessable cost was $36,848.50. There were 26 Residential Equivalent Units at a cost of $1,417.25/REU. For Project A-258, the total assessable cost was $35,431.25. There were 25 Residential Equivalent Units at a cost of $1,417.25/REU. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-31, Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements and Resolution No. 2016-28, Levying Special Assessments for Public Improvements. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. As Mr. Neuendorf was not yet present, the agenda was reordered to next consider Item VIII.B. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS Minutes/Edina City Council/March 2, 2016 Page 3 VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-30 CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN FROM HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION – ADOPTED Ellen Kennedy, Human Rights and Relations Commissioner, asked the Council to approve the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Decimation Against Women (CEDAW) Resolution as prepared by the Human Rights and Relations Commission. She reviewed that in 1979, the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Until the adoption of CEDAW, no treaty fully addressed women’s rights within political, cultural, economic, social, and family life. To date, more than forty United States cities, two dozen counties, and twenty state legislatures have passed resolutions urging CEDAW ratification. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-30, Supporting Cities for the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) Initiative and Support of the Principles of the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women at the Local Level. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – continued - Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.B. ESTABLISHING GRANDVIEW 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-29 ADOPTED Economic Development Manager Presentation Economic Development Manager Neuendorf shared that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority recommended that the City consider a new Tax Increment Financing District to advance community goals in a portion of the Grandview commercial area. The proposed Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District was a follow up to the original Grandview Tax Increment Financing District that was in effect from 1984 to 2010. The original Tax Increment Financing District was successful in sparking improvements on the west side of the railroad tracks including condominiums, office building, senior center, library, and streetscape improvements. However, a new District was necessary to address the high costs of anticipated redevelopment in the area. New projects would be hindered by existing buildings, contaminated soils, and outdated public infrastructure. Mr. Neuendorf stated the City retained Ehlers and Associates to prepare the Tax Increment Financing plan and necessary modifications to the Redevelopment Project Area. LHB, Inc. conducted inspections of the buildings and determined that the proposed District satisfied the requirements for creation of a 26-year Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District. Mr. Neuendorf presented the community vision; steps to establish, fund and monitor Tax Increment Financing; the proposed district; likely uses of incremental taxes collected; and, a But-For Analysis per Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Statute. Mr. Neuendorf answered questions of the Council related to tax capacity, pooling requirements, and the But-For test. Michael Fischer, LHB, Inc., answered questions of the Council related to State Statutes and Tax Increment Financing requirements. Minutes/Edina City Council/March 2, 2016 Page 4 Nick Anhut, Ehlers and Associates, answered questions of the Council related to whether parcels were required to be adjacent and the boundaries of the district. Mark Ruff, Ehlers and Associates, answered questions of the Council related to Tax Increment Financing in relation to school finances. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:40 p.m. Public Testimony Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Stephanie Mullaney, 4429 Brookside Terrace, addressed the Council. Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood Lane, addressed the Council. John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, addressed the Council. Leny Wallen-Friedman, 6805 Limerick Lane, Chair of Edina Public Schools, addressed the Council. Ellen Jones, 5261 Lochloy Drive, addressed the Council. Patrick Olk, 5315 Pinewood Trail, addressed the Council. Frank Lorenz, 7152 York Avenue South, addressed the Council. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood Avenue, addressed the Council. Steven Timmer, 5348 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Staff and consultants addressed issues raised during public testimony, including school property values, blight, density, traffic studies, length of Tax Increment Financing term, and concerns of the School Board. The Council discussed the risks and benefits of a shorter Tax Increment Financing term and whether Tax Increment Financing was a benefit or burden for the school district. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-29, Adopting a Modification the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area; and Establishing the Grandview 2 Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing District therein and Adopting a Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Minutes/Edina City Council/March 2, 2016 Page 5 The Council discussed some modifications to the Resolution, but noted that the changes could be handled administratively. The Council continued discussions and each shared their opinion. Council Member Brindle noted the concern from citizens that Tax Increment Financing would assist developers and stated she could not support this Resolution. She suggested an interim use for the Public Works building. Rollcall: Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Nay: Brindle Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS – continued VIII.A. MEDICAL CANNABIS MANUFACTURING AND DISPENSARIES REPORT – UPDATED Community Development Director Teague shared that the 12-month moratorium disallowing Medical Cannabis Manufacturing and Dispensaries had expired. State regulations allowed one facility within each congressional district. Minneapolis, Eden Prairie, and Eagan had locations; therefore, it was unlikely that one would locate in Edina. If a facility were to be located in Edina, it could be located under current zoning ordinances in the Planned Industrial District for manufacturing and distributions and in the Planned Commercial District or Planned Office District for distributions. No action was requested of the Council. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-30 CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN FROM HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION – ADOPTED This item was considered following Item VI.A. VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-16 ADOPTED – ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-16 accepting various grants and donations. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION, HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION: CO- SPONSOR REFUGEE EVENT IX.B. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: Minutes/Edina City Council/March 2, 2016 Page 6 1. ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 19, 2015 AND DECEMBER 17, 2015 2. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DECEMBER 17, 2015 AND JANUARY 21, 2016 3. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, JANUARY 26, 2016 4. COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, JANUARY 5, 2016 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XI.A. CITY MANAGER’S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT Mayor Hovland thanked Manager Neal for his years of service and read the Performance Evaluation Report as follows: “The City Council along with Consultant Harry Brull of BCG Consulting Group conducted a performance evaluation of City Manager Scott Neal at a closed meeting on February 24, 2016. The meeting was posted and recorded as required by law. Input for Mr. Neal’s evaluation was collected from the City Council with additional input from Edina’s Department Heads and staff. Areas covered included leadership, human relations, communication skills, judgement, decision making, administrative skills, technical skills, and personal characteristics. In all of those areas Manager Neal meets or exceeds the expectations of the City Council. City Council and staff find Scott Neal to be a strong leader. He has built a level of trust with all levels of the organization and stresses the integrity, quality, and services that are established for customer service. Scott is committed to the City of Edina and the community. He is passionate about public administration and developing future leaders. He is seen as a great listener and excellent communicator in both verbal and written communications. He and the City Council also discussed projects over the next twelve months and our goals for 2016.” XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XII.A. COMMUNITY COMMENT AGENDA LOCATION It was suggested to consider Item VII. Community Comment following Item IV. Consent Agenda. Member Brindle supported reordering the agenda to consider Item VII. Community Comment following Item III. Meeting Agenda Approval. XIII. SCHEDULE OF DATES, EVENTS AND MEETINGS AS OF MARCH 2, 2016 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 15, 2016. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the March 2, 2016, meeting available. Minutes/Edina City Council/March 2, 2016 Page 7 Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 2/25/2016 TOTAL: $475,503.96 And Per Pre-List Dated 3/03/2016 TOTAL: $836,236.57 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment. INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Claims Pre-List Dated 2/25/2016 TOTAL: $475,503.96 Claims Pre-List Dated 3/03/2016 TOTAL: $836,236.57 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2725 2/25/2016 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 2,550.43 TRUCK WASH DOOR REPAIRS 394340 21602051 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,550.43 2726 2/25/2016 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 105.14 ADAPTERS 00005055 394217 0146432-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.14 2727 2/25/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 44.80 394513 1976113 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 44.80 2728 2/25/2016 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 57.75 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 394433 143509 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 57.75 2729 2/25/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 503.74 COFFEE 394507 1215327 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 503.74 2730 2/25/2016 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 361.00 DASHERBOARDS 394545 00105534 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 300.18 DRESSING STONES & GROOMER 00002306 394387 1000215 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 415.00 ICE SKATES 00002306 394388 1000269 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,076.18 2731 2/25/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 56.39 394515 52369600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 53.55 394516 52369800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7.65- 394517 93441700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 102.29 2732 2/25/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 227.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 394220 WO-178307-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 24.46 CASH REGISTER ROLLS 00009468 394442 WO-179273-1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 251.61 2733 2/25/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 19.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 394221 115876 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 251.06 394222 115950 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 270.68 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 — Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2733 2734 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Continued... 2,726.14 VEHICLE REPAIRS 394341 196621 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,726.14 2735 2/25/2016 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 2,347.00 MATERIALS TESTING 394374 B042495 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 2,347.00 2736 2/25/2016 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 25,688.50 JAN 2016 LODGING TAX 394559 1/31/2016 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 25,688.50 2737 2/25/2016 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 394242 2468588 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 2738 2/25/2016 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 10.30 PVC ADAPTERS 00001428 394255 973520 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 10.30 2739 2/25/2016 100858 LOGIS 660.44 394365 41285,41339 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,703.80 394365 41285,41339 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 5,694.83 394365 41285,41339 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 6,190.17 394365 41285,41339 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 9,053.04 394365 41285,41339 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 9,876.83 394365 41285,41339 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 10,868.18 394365 41285,41339 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 12,417.71 394365 41285,41339 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 56,465.00 2740 2/25/2016 103944 MED COMPASS 28.00 HEARING TEST 394357 28640 1400.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 28.00 2741 2/25/2016 101483 MENARDS 15.63 FILTERS, CAULK 00005073 394258 6340 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 77.49 SEEDS, WATERING CANS 00001420 394259 6476 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93.12 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 — Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2741 2742 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 101483 MENARDS 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY Continued... 274.20 BLEACH, GLOVES, SOAP 394366 38062 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 370.85 PAPER PRODUCTS 394366 38062 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 645.05 2743 2/25/2016 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 321.76 SEALS 00006465 394488 1050117-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 321.76 2744 2/25/2016 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 225.00 INSTALL THIN ICE SIGNS 394268 2277 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 225.00 2745 2/25/2016 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 2,513.93 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 394379 15-5 03489.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 16,308.77 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 394379 15-5 04410.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 18,822.70 2746 2/25/2016 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 757.00 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 394394 66368 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 757.00 2747 2/25/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 670.70 TIRES 00005913 394275 210217556 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,022.00 TIRE RECAPS 00005930 394276 210219298 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 146.00 TIRES 00005930 394427 210220237 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,838.70 2748 2/25/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 362.80 TOWELS, MOP HEADS, CLEANERS 00002120 394328 8852 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,125.72 CUPS, PLATES, CUTLERY SETS 394329 8858 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,488.52 2749 2/25/2016 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 392.75 BRUSHES, SNOW BREAKER 394497 0059195-IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 392.75 2750 2/25/2016 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 553.74 DRINKING FOUNTAIN REPAIRS 00002308 394395 67840 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2760 2/25/2016 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY Continued... 553.74 2761 2/25/2016 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 322.72 PW ENVELOPES 394370 89487 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 58.50 BUSINESS CARDS 394369 89517 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 381.22 2752 2/25/2016 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 68.31 SCREWS, TORX BITS 00001406 394278 41369959 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 68.31 2753 2/25/2016 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 417.02 CUTTING EDGE KITS 00005061 394280 38467 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 697.02 SALTER PARTS 00001291 394430 38501 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,114.04 2764 2/25/2016 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 105.00 SVVITCH 00005054 394285 7275380 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.13 LENS 00005048 394284 7275383 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 283.00 FILTERS, BULB, SUPPORT 00005989 394286 7275388 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,053.87 CUTTING EDGE SET 00005025 394361 7275392 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,470.00 2755 2/25/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 882.50 394542 0145331-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 434.17 394541 0145332-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,316.67 2756 2/25/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,195.17 394410 417748-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,195.17 401978 2/25/2016 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 130.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 394554 022016 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 130.00 401979 2/25/2016 137606 ABOOD, JOSEPH 44.25 REIMBURSE EXPENSES 394432 021916 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 44.25 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 — 2/25/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Page - 5 Business Unit 401980 2/25/2016 129458 ACME TOOLS Continued... 209.99 AIR COMPRESSOR 00005029 394218 3965165 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 209.99 401981 2/25/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 1,371.92 GOLF BALLS 394372 901671775 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,371.92 401982 2/25/2016 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 120.90 COFFEE 394299 45748 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 120.90 401983 2/25/2016 103285 AMEM 130.00 DUES - DARRELL TODD 394434 2016 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 130.00 401984 2/25/2016 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 812.59 COPY PAPER 394505 10463895-00 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 549.45 COPY PAPER 394506 10464074-00 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 1,362.04 401985 2/25/2016 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 664.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 394300 58049 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 664.00 401986 2/25/2016 138001 ANDERSON, JANYCE M. 1,461.80 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 394373 154772 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,461.80 401987 2/25/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 910.75 394514 3083249 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 910.75 401988 2/25/2016 102503 BAGS & BOWS 5.00 DELIVERY CHARGE 00009462 394435 0093614957 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 5.00 401989 2/25/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 319.44 CHARGER, BATTERIES 394555 018-103843-01 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 11.98 BATTERIES 00003016 394301 018-396540 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 331.42 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Page - 6 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 - 2/25/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 401989 401990 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 126996 BCA - CJTE Continued... 240.00 IMPACT & INFLUENCE TRAINING 394382 17072-010416SMI 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 394383 26379-010416SMI 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 394385 26385-010416SMI 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 394384 26538-010416SMI 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 394386 29828-010416SMI 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,200.00 401991 2/25/2016 130924 BEARING INDUSTRIAL & SUPPLIES INC. 21.76 BALL BEARINGS 00005815 394574 0040219-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 163.44 INSERT BEARINGS 00005078 394303 0040410-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.92 BOLT HOUSING 00005078 394302 0040411-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 274.12 401992 2/25/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 648.00 PIZZA 394304 D2814041 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 648.00 401993 2/25/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 20.00 394518 280131 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 308.70 394519 280132 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 114.40 394436 280568 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 443.10 401994 2/25/2016 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 158.80 COFFEE 394646 T154236 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 229.00 COFFEE 394547 T155732 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 607.90 COFFEE 394548 T157372 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 97.70 COFFEE 394437 T158699 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 35.50 394438 T159340 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 305.00 394439 T160305 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 232.00 394440 T164169 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 45.45 394441 T165839 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 126.95 COFFEE 394219 T81033 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 401994 2/25/2016 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Continued... 1,838.30 401995 2/25/2016 136855 BOBER, SARAH 662.08 CRAFT SUPPLIES 394305 021616 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 662.08 401996 2/25/2016 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 400.00 ROOM RENTAL FEE 394306 9553 2611.6150 BUILDING RENTAL MUSIC IN EDINA 400.00 401997 2/25/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 10,398.58 394401 1080436106 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 338.85 394400 1080436107 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,276.16 394398 1080436108 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \MNE VERNON SELLING 4,096.40 394399 1080436109 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \A/INE VERNON SELLING 248.15 394397 1080436110 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 17,358.14 401998 2/25/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 1,508.35 394403 1090526295 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 48.60 394402 1090526296 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,105.96 394520 1090528191 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 71.40 394521 1090528192 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,734.31 401999 2/25/2016 122195 BRUNSWICK ZONE - EDEN PRAIRIE 67.60 394412 1414714 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 72.80 BOWLING 394411 1414715 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 83.20 394413 1414716 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 57.20 394414 1814601 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 280.80 402000 2/25/2016 137991 BRUSKE PRODUCTS 295.65 BRUSHES FOR TENNANT 00005022 394223 8483 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 295.65 402001 2/25/2016 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR 225.00 OFFICIATING FEES 394224 8 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 225.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 - 2/25/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402002 2/25/2016 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF Continued... 1,744.16- CREDIT 394549 926470129 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 690.53 IRONS 394444 926564745 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 333.00 DRIVER 394445 926564746 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 142.65 GOLF BAG 394443 926564819 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 340.66 CLUBS 394451 926567467 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 599.41 CLUBS 394446 926567550 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,017.91 CLUBS 394447 926567554 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,501.44 GOLF BALLS 394448 926567558 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,543.30 CLUBS 394450 926567613 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,663.68 GOLF BALLS 394449 926570167 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 9,000.00 RANGE BALLS 394452 926590097 5424.6590 RANGE BALLS RANGE 15,088.42 402003 2/25/2016 111089 CARLSON, ERIC 188.23 UNIFORM PURCHASE 394556 021916 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 188.23 402004 2/25/2016 138002 CARTURAN, MARY 1,594.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 394375 153512 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,594.00 402005 2/25/2016 129923 CAWLEY 284.99 NAME TAGS 394307 V349313 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - ADMINISTRATION 26.48 394415 V352289 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 311.47 402006 2/25/2016 130603 CEDAR RIDGE LANDSCAPING INC. 31,100.10 LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 394376 VALLEY VIEW RD 01263.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS A263 Valley View Landscaping 31,100.10 402007 2/25/2016 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. 7,400.82 394225 3181322 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 102.43 394226 3181572 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 7,503.25 402008 2/25/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 161.29 952 285-2951 394227 2951-2/16 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 62.80 952 944-6522 394389 6522-2/16 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 224.09 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402009 2/25/2016 135835 CENTURYLINK Continued... 1,335.45 612-D08-2053-053 394390 2053-2/16 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 1,335.45 402010 2/25/2016 100683 CHEMSEARCH 666.08 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 394453 2205862 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 666.08 402011 2/25/2016 129285 CHINOOK BOOK 500.00 EP COUPON BOOKS 394308 IM-0000058168 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 500.00 402012 2/25/2016 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 516.98 00105263-0335037016 394309 335037016-2/16 1646.6189 SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6,651.32 00103426-0345052006 394342 345052006-2/16 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 7,168.30 402013 2/25/2016 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 183.28 394522 0148064319 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 183.28 402014 2/25/2016 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 897.49 MAR 2016 MAINTENANCE 394310 2073-2/16 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 897.49 402015 2/25/2016 120433 COMCAST 28.94 8772 10 614 0220686 394311 220686-2/16 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 25.98 8772 10 614 0496856 394454 496856-2/16 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 54.92 402016 2/25/2016 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 605.20 DOME ADVERTISING 394455 NVV711545 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 360.00 DOME ADVERTISING 394456 NVV711546 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 965.20 402017 2/25/2016 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 23.10 INSPECTIONS 394377 P00005334 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 31.50 INSPECTIONS 394377 P00005334 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA-377 VALLEY VIEW RD 39.97 INSPECTIONS 394377 P00005334 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA-377 VALLEY VIEW RD 66.85 INSPECTIONS 394377 P00005334 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 336.17 INSPECTIONS 394377 P00005334 10096.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR6 54TH STREET BRIDGE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402017 2/25/2016 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION Continued... 361.82 INSPECTIONS 394377 P00005334 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 57.75 INSPECTIONS 394228 P00005409 10096.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR6 54TH STREET BRIDGE 76.45 INSPECTIONS 394228 P00005409 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 284.73 INSPECTIONS 394228 P00005409 01377.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA-377 VALLEY VIEW RD 1,278.34 402018 2/25/2016 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC. 369.88 SAW REPAIR 00001418 394343 102934 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 369.88 402019 2/25/2016 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 366.02 RESALE PRODUCT 394550 42724 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS 999.43 RESALE PRODUCT 394551 43091 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS 620.00 RESALE PRODUCT 394552 43118 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,985.45 402020 2/25/2016 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 816.00 FEB 2016 NEWSLETTERS 394557 305740 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 648.00 EXTRA NEWSLETTERS 394558 305796 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,464.00 402021 2/25/2016 118189 DEM-CON COMPANIES 4.14 TAX/FEES ON INVOICE 10049 394575 10049 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4.14 402022 2/25/2016 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 265.00 PERMIT FOR ROUNDABOUT 394312 UWAT010525 01430.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 265.00 402023 2/25/2016 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 476.25 JAN 2016 FEES 394229 3258317 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 476.25 402024 2/25/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 63.25 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 394313 307157 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 184.00 HRATIF PLAN NOTICE 394314 307158 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 247.25 402025 2/25/2016 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 6,655.03 LS6 PUMP REPAIR 00001371 394344 0057228-IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402025 2/25/2016 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. Continued... 6,655.03 402026 2/25/2016 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 2,285.00 STATE CONFERENCE 394315 EXPENSES 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 2,285.00 402027 2/25/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 81.00 WIPER BLADES 394232 1-4915217 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.44 SHOE KIT 394230 69-209760 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 116.34 BATTERY 394234 69-211294 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 78.15 FILTER, OIL PAN SEAL 394231 69-211474 1563.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.80 FILTERS 394235 69-211600 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 411.95 BRAKE KITS, ROTOR ASSEMBLIES 394233 69-211725 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.49 AIR FILTER 394345 69-211773 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.77 WATER PUMP, THERMOSTAT 394236 69-211825 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.47 IDLER & TENSIONER, BELT 394237 69-211961 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 955.41 402028 2125/2016 122549 FARNER-BOCKEN COMPANY 740.41 394458 4588769 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 576.55 CONCESSION PRODUCT 394457 4604606 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,316.96 402029 2/25/2016 137669 FARRELL, CHRIS 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 394316 021616 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 402030 2/25/2016 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 5.11 CLEVIS PINS 00001325 394238 MNTC2135159 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 5.11 402031 2/25/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 5,180.41 METERS FOR RESALE 00001396 394240 0180393 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 1,691.64 METER RESALE SUPPLIES 00001484 394346 0180397 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 356.58 READERS FOR RESALE 00001485 394239 0180835 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 7,228.63 402032 2/25/2016 119211 FIRSTLAB 391.00 DRUG SCREENING 394241 FL00141824 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 391.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - 2/25/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402032 402033 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 119211 FIRSTLAB 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY Continued... 225.60 PADLOCKS 394560 1109706 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 225.60 402034 2/25/2016 102727 FORCE AMERICA 497.27 TIE BOLT, SEAL KITS, SENSOR 00005063 394243 IN001-1025682 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 497.27 402035 2/25/2016 133742 FUN2RAISE MARKETING AND EVENTS 259.00 AD IN SUMMER FUN GUIDE 394459 3319 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 259.00 402036 2/25/2016 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 ACCT 0012939 394460 1006547799 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 15.00 402037 2/25/2016 104716 GALE-TEC ENGINEERING INC. 1,175.00 INTERLACHEN SIDEWALK PROJECT 394244 2475 07111.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN S-111 INTERLACHEN BLVD 1,175.00 402038 2/25/2016 138005 GC ARCHITECTS LLC 751.35 OVERPAYMENT REFUND-FINAL 394461 6004 ZENITH AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 751.35 402039 2/25/2016 137990 GLEASON HOMEOWNERS ASSN 464.68 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 394245 6400 GLEAWN CT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 464.68 402040 2/25/2016 125935 GOLF SCORECARDS INC. 779.95 SCORECARDS 394462 41648 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 779.95 402041 2/25/2016 101103 GRAINGER 36.61 RECEPTACLE 00006008 394463 9005822623 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 58.59 SURGE PROTECTORS 00006009 394465 9008274855 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 77.07 LIGHT PANEL, HALIDE LAMP 00002130 394319 9010082056 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 42.64 GAS LINE 00006461 394464 9010297126 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 107.52 EXTENSION CORDS 00002132 394317 9012004033 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 - 2/25/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Page - 13 Business Unit 402041 2/25/2016 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 61.20 FLOURESCENT LAMPS 00002133 394318 9014652771 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 20.72 DUSTER 00005934 394246 9018481078 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.16 EPDXY 00005018 394247 9020107828 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 152.16 SCRATCH BRUSHES 00005018 394251 9020766763 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.96 LAMP CORD 00005018 394248 9021303939 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.63 WIRE STRIPPER 00005018 394249 9021428777 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.77 SAFETY GLASSES 00005117 394250 9021740809 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 579.27 RETRACTABLE CORD REEL 00001356 394416 9021902441 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 452.70 DIGITAL DISPLAY 00001431 394252 9024206642 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,702.00 402042 2/25/2016 137922 HAWLEY, JAMES 100.40 OVERPAYMENT REFUND-FINAL 394466 5816 ARBOUR AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 100.40 402043 2/25/2016 100798 HAYDEN-MURPHY EQUIPMENT 2,570.36 TIRES 00005974 394347 C99975 1553.6563 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,570.36 402044 2/25/2016 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 250.52 STORM SEWER PIPING 00001405 394253 F084514 5932.6535 PIPE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,215.53 GATE VALVE PARTS 00001417 394417 F110883 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,466.05 402045 2/25/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,193.75 JAN 2016 ROOM & BOARD 394391 1000070289 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 1,193.75 402046 2/25/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,923.86 JAN 2016 RADIO FEES 394298 1000069926 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,901.80 RADIO FEES 2015 394378 1000069926 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6,825.66 402047 2/25/2016 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 336.00 MONITOR REPLACEMENTS 00004307 394467 56841083 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 336.00 402048 2/25/2016 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 77.27 SQUEEGEE BRACKET KIT 394468 700222028 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 77.27 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 — Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402048 402049 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 103753 104375 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 958.25 394523 810451 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 958.25 402050 2/25/2016 134784 IDEA CREEK LLC, THE 130.00 PLAQUE 394364 73 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 130.00 402051 2/25/2016 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 970.43 PARTS 394320 013116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 970.43 402052 2/25/2016 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 354.70 394508 608458174 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 354.70 402053 2/25/2016 121404 I-STATE TRUCK CENTER 172.38 SURGE TANK KIT, FILLER CAP 00005082 394254 C242390881:01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 172.38 402054 2/25/2016 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 4.78 394256 1/16-ENG 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION 4.78 402055 2/25/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 60.00- 394526 2458242 5862,5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,105.86 394524 2467722 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 39.05 394525 2467723 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,084.91 402056 2/25/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,021.60 394531 5374940 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 289.82 394530 5374942 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 25.16 394528 5374943 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,634.50 394529 5374944 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,971.08 402057 2/25/2016 102603 JONAS, LENORE 86.26 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 394469 021916 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - 2/25/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402057 2/25/2016 102603 JONAS, LENORE Continued... 86.26 402058 2/25/2016 138006 KANNENBERG, LISA 45.00 CLASS REFUND 394470 113400 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 45.00 402059 2/25/2016 111018 KEEPRS INC. 88.00 HANDGUN PARTS 394348 300513 1400,6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 88.00 402060 2/25/2016 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 48.60 KEYS 00001307 394418 SI027497 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 990.00 KEYS 00008067 394471 S1028102 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,038.60 402061 2/25/2016 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 9.56 394321 021716 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 49.00 394321 021716 5760.6235 POSTAGE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 62.00 394321 021716 5760.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 70.96 394321 021716 5751.4524 CONCESSIONS - CENTENNIAL CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 191.52 402062 2/25/2016 133189 LANDMARK BUILDING CONTRACTORS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 394561 5908 GRIMES AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 394472 6021 KELLOGG 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 5,000.00 402063 2/25/2016 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 302.02 TRACTOR PARTS 00002305 394392 01-353549 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 302.02 402064 2/25/2016 136231 LARSON, DEB 700.00 JAN 2016 MARKETING SERVICES 394257 012916 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 700.00 JAN 2016 MARKETING SERVICES 394257 012916 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 700.00 JAN 2016 MARKETING SERVICES 394257 012916 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,100.00 402065 2/25/2016 102965 LEONE, RON 500.00 UNIFORM PURCHASES 394349 021716 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 -- Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402065 2/25/2016 102965 LEONE, RON Continued... 500.00 402066 2/25/2016 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 3,177.90 E911 SERVICE CONTRACT 394322 2174333 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 3,177.90 402067 2/25/2016 133185 LOGAN, PATRICK 83.68 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 394473 021716 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 83.68 402068 2/25/2016 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 254.96 394356 185881 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 189.66 394354 189646 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 213.97 394353 189649 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7,489.23 FUEL 00005030 394420 189656 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7,475.36 FUEL 00005030 394421 189657 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.81 394352 189673 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.12 FUEL 00005030 394350 189677 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 291.38 394355 189730 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,930.54 DIESEL FUEL 00005030 394422 189971 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 632.70 FUEL 00005030 394419 189983 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.00- JAN 2016 REFUND 394562 MBINV/00074378 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23,472.73 402069 2/25/2016 138007 MARK, DAN 120.00 MODEL 394474 021916 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 120.00 402070 2/25/2016 101555 MARSHALL & SWIFT/BOECKH LLC 634.20 MARSHALL VALUATION BOOK 394475 1 YEAR 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 634.20 402071 2/25/2016 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 456.75 OXYGEN 00003649 394476 12863325 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 456.75 402072 2/25/2016 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 207.00 PHONE FOR ZAMBONI ROOM 394477 82195 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 207.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 — 2/25/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402073 2/25/2016 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS Continued... 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 394260 4912 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 85.50 OFFICIATING FEES 394261 4922 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 85.50 OFFICIATING FEES 394573 4930 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 342.00 402074 2/25/2016 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 485.50 VEHICLE REPAIR 394563 277846 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 485.50 402075 2/25/2016 101471 MGCSA 150.00 DUES - BOB ATOL 394479 00111 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 150.00 DUES-TOM SWENSON 394478 00385 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 402076 2/25/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,565.00 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 394358 35143 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,132.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001489 394423 35145 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 6,697.50 402077 2/25/2016 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,185.00 CONNECTION FEE 394262 1270011EDINA 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22,185.00 402078 2/25/2016 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 150.00 PERMIT FOR WATERMAIN WORK 394359 021715 05559.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Golf Terrace B 150.00 402079 2/25/2016 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 43.60 TOGGLE SWITCH 394263 P98889 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.60 402080 2/25/2016 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 23.78 PLASTIC FITTINGS 00001337 394424 0112639-IN 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 23.78 402081 2/25/2016 103198 MINNESOTA WOMENS PRESS INC 380.00 ART CENTER ADVERTISING 394486 00065162 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 380.00 402082 2/25/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 -- 2/25/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402082 2/25/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 348.00 AQUATIC CENTER RACK CARDS 394265 19732 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 193.80 GOLF DOME BROCHURES 394264 19739 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 53.00 CITYSLICK NEWSLETTERS 394266 19757 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 97.00 CO MONITORING FORMS 394266 19757 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 78.00 HEALTH EDINA NEWSLETTER 394267 19767 1490.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC HEALTH 769.80 402083 2/25/2016 134703 MJL HOMES LLC 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 394480 5705 BERNARD PL 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 394485 5717 YORK AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 1,866.69 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 394483 6013 EWING AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 394484 6121 EWING AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 394481 6128 BEARD PL 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 394482 6212 EWING AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 14,366.69 402084 2/25/2016 122036 M-K GRAPHICS 171.11 PAYROLL CHECKS 394509 6357 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 171.11 402085 2/25/2016 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 30.00 BOILER INSPECTIONS 394323 ABR01353441 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS WATER TREATMENT 30.00 402086 2/25/2016 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 2,472.85 MN GOLFER MAGAZINE AD 394487 2016-41328 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,472.85 402087 2/25/2016 124571 MURPHY, WENDY 34.82 CONCESSION PRODUCT 394564 022116 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS 34.82 402088 2/25/2016 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 122.40 FINAL WIRING 394489 115567 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 122.40 402089 2/25/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 660.00 LIGHTING 00001344 394490 94196 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 216.00 LAMPS 394269 94390 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 876.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402089 2/25/2016 402090 2/25/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 101729 NORMAN, POLLY Continued... 200.00 PROF SERVICES 394324 021616 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 200.00 402091 2/25/2016 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 234.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 394491 820853772001 5511.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 234.72 402092 2/25/2016 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 27.67 394367 W16010667 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 27.67 394367 W16010667 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 55.34 394367 W16010667 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 80.93 394367 W16010667 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 83.01 394367 W16010667 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 201.85 394367 W16010667 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 312.53 394367 W16010667 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 55.34 394367 W16010667 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 31.75 394367 W16010667 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 118.84 394367 W16010667 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 124.51 394367 W16010667 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 124.52 394367 W16010667 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 55.34 394367 W16010667 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 83.01 394367 W16010667 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 83.01 394367 W16010667 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 63.50 394367 W16010667 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 291.34 394368 W16010672 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 46.27 JAN 2016 LANGUAGE LINE 394393 W16010746 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,866.43 402093 2/25/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 141.31 GLOVES, STRAPS 00001427 394270 575269 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 5.00 CHAIN 00001433 394425 575353 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 146.31 402094 2/25/2016 137994 ORANGE, MICHAEL 337.50 EEC CHG ESTIMATE 394325 020816 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 337.50 402095 2/25/2016 101659 ORKIN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 — Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402095 2/25/2016 101659 ORKIN Continued... 130.00 12557623 394271 107610854 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 130.00 402096 2/25/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,816.75 394404 8536150-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,816.75 402097 2/25/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 26.58 394492 47525542 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 398.50 394532 50268106 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 425.08 402098 2/25/2016 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 275.00 EDITION EDINA DESIGN 394426 021716-1 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 275.00 402099 2/25/2016 119935 PET CROSSING 2,914.44 K9 BLADE EXAM 394272 141817 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 2,914.44 402100 2/25/2016 135849 PETSMART #2412 75.98 K9 FOOD AND SUPPLIES 00003013 394273 T-0232 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 75.98 402101 2/25/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 210.32 394533 2931247 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,234.30 394535 2931258 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,238.11 394534 2931259 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,140.78 394536 2931260 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,823.51 402102 2/25/2016 101138 PLEAA 210.00 ANNUAL DUES (6) 394274 2016 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 210.00 402103 2/25/2016 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 49.29 PAINT 394493 985103068073 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 49.29 402104 2/25/2016 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 — 2/25/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402104 2/25/2016 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. Continued... 4.00 609425 394327 609425-1/16 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOLADMINISTRATION 38.14 622833 394326 622833-1/16 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 42.14 402105 2/25/2016 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 240.00 BLADE SHARPENING 394494 276607 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 240.00 402106 2/25/2016 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC. 335.93 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001352 394277 55030 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 335.93 402107 2/25/2016 135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT 204.28 FILTERS 00006672 394495 129352 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 204.28 402108 2/25/2016 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 1,132.75 BEDKNIFE 00006458 394496 CD1979094 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,132.75 402109 2/25/2016 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 144.99 SAFETY BOOTS 394565 10-268 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS 394565 10-268 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS 394565 10-268 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 494.99 402110 2/25/2016 134496 REFINED LLC 2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 394566 6304 WESTWOOD 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS CT 2,500.00 402111 2/25/2016 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 437.14 UNIFORM PURCHASE 394567 021916 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 437.14 402112 2/25/2016 100995 SEH 4,897.02 18-HOLE WETLANDS 394428 310677 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 4,897.02 402113 2/25/2016 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402113 2/25/2016 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP Continued... 1,694.08 TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR TRAINER 394553 B04475180 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1,694.08 402114 2/25/2016 120784 SIGN PRO 13.16 SIGNAGE 394429 10020 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 232.00 DASHERBOARD 394371 10115 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 245.16 402115 2/25/2016 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 55.65 TIME CLOCK RENTAL 394330 13075737 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 55.65 402116 2/25/2016 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 77.86 HOT DOG BUNS 394500 280830 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 77.86 402117 2/25/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 487.51 CART 00005027 394279 ARV/28111574 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 487.51 402118 2/25/2016 136580 SOCIABLE CIDER WERKS LLC 250.00 394537 3076 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 250.00 402119 2/25/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 6,735.90 394406 1378041 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 39.67 394538 1378042 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,898.60 394405 1378043 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 107.80 394407 1378044 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 429.60 394408 1378045 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 60.00- 394409 9072259 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12,151.57 402120 2/25/2016 110977 SOW, ADAMA 708.50 ART WORK SOLD 391391 010816 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 708.50 402121 2/25/2016 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 14,154.05 TRAFFIC STUDY 394510 09106.00-1 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 14,154.05 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 — Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402121 402122 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 134925 STACON Continued... 883.37 REPLACEMENT TRANSDUCER 00001415 394360 IN00078521 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 883.37 402123 2/25/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 163.75 394539 9681 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 163.75 402124 2/25/2016 102262 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS INC. 1,350.00 CIP SOFTWARE 394281 16PLAN-IT-044 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 1,350.00 402125 2/25/2016 138008 SWIGGUM, CHELSEA 27.93 SUPPLIES FOR FROZEN EVENT 394568 021516 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 27.93 402126 2/25/2016 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA 450.42 CONCESSION PRODUCT 394331 602050512 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 412.44 394332 602090318 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 438.70 394333 602120484 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,301.56 402127 2/25/2016 137993 TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC. 960.00 911 SUPPLIES 394334 0008055 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 960.00 402128 2/25/2016 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 447.50 ICE MELT 394282 S226832-IN 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 447.50 402129 2/25/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1,371.80 394540 1038170 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,371.80 402130 2/25/2016 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 169.50 2/2/16 COUNCIL MEETING 394335 M21920 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 169.50 402131 2/25/2016 136802 TINBERG, TIM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 - 2/25/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402131 2/25/2016 136802 TINBERG, TIM Continued... 37.39 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 394502 021716 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 37.39 402132 2/25/2016 120595 1-MOBILE 34.04 394501 477067848-1/16 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 34.04 402133 2/25/2016 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 75.83 WELDING GAS 394287 40040759 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.11 WELDING TANKS 00002307 394396 40040760 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 108.94 402134 2/25/2016 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC 770.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT EXAMS 394288 020916 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 770.00 402135 2/25/2016 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC. 270.00 EXCAVATION SAFETY CLASSES 394569 135121132-001 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 270.00 402136 2/25/2016 103590 VALLEY-RICH CO. INC. 1,733.00 OPERATOR/MACHINE - WMB 00001397 394289 22483 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,867.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001399 394290 22492 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,600.00 402137 2/25/2016 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.01 394381 9756465814 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 35.01 394381 9756465814 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 35.01 394381 9756465814 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 70.02 394381 9756465814 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 210.06 394381 9756465814 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 280.08 394381 9756465814 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 350.10 394381 9756465814 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 700.20 394381 9756465814 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 910.30 394381 9756465814 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.01 394381 9756465814 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 35.01 394381 9756465814 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 525.15 394381 9756465814 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 50.48 394380 9756518811 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 474.96 394380 9756518811 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402137 2/25/2016 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS Continued... 856.58 394380 9756518811 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.05 394380 9756518811 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 100.96 394380 9756518811 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 35.01 394336 9758109244 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 35.01 394336 9758109244 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 35.01 394336 9758109244 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 70.02 394336 9758109244 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 210.06 394336 9758109244 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 280.08 394336 9758109244 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 350.10 394336 9758109244 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 700.26 394336 9758109244 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 910.49 394336 9758109244 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.01 394336 9758109244 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 35.01 394336 9758109244 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 525.15 394336 9758109244 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 50.77 394337 9758161748 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 941.39 394337 9758161748 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.32 394337 9758161748 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 101.54 394337 9758161748 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 35.01 394338 9759736984 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 35.01 394338 9759736984 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 35.01 394338 9759736984 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 70.02 394338 9759736984 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 210.06 394338 9759736984 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 280.21 394338 9759736984 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 350.10 394338 9759736984 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 749.92 394338 9759736984 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 910.28 394338 9759736984 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.01 394338 9759736984 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH&FR PARKING&WAYFINDING 35.01 394338 9759736984 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 525.15 394338 9759736984 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 50.77 394339 9759789462 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 908.63 394339 9759789462 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.34 394339 9759789462 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 101.54 394339 9759789462 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 13444.29 402138 2/25/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 180.54 LIGHTING RELAYS 00001359 394291 11194160 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 180.54 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 2/25/2016 - Inv No 2/25/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402138 402139 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS Continued... 127.79 BRATS 394503 87846 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 127.79 402140 2/25/2016 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 52.53 394362 17021 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 72.30 394362 17021 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 101.15 394362 17021 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 167.66 394362 17021 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 266.76 394362 17021 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 574.59 394362 17021 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 574.60 394362 17021 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 71.08 394362 17021 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 77.28 394362 17021 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 168.36 394362 17021 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 184.53 394362 17021 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 1,948.95 394362 17021 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,336.95 394362 17021 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 87.23 394362 17021 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 206.03 394362 17021 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 5,890.00 402141 2/25/2016 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC. 1,198.90 LEAK LOCATES 00001481 394363 6577 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,198.90 402142 2/25/2016 130574 WATSON COMPANY 453.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 394504 861090 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 453.15 402143 2/25/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 3,379.32 394543 7069278 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,757.92 394544 7069282 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,137.24 402144 2/25/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY 762.32 51-4197645-8 394292 489235911 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,494.86 51-6227619-3 394293 489646882 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 6,732.77 51-0837548-4 394511 490097981 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/25/2016 — 2/25/2016 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2/24/2016 11:32:35 Page - 27 Business Unit 402144 2/25/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued.. 154.49 51-0010025256-3 394512 490119532 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 23.75 51-4151897-6 394572 490186724 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.79 51-7567037-0 394571 490223440 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.65 51-0010613106-9 394570 490265975 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 10,228.63 402145 2/25/2016 132109 YOUNG, SEAN 149.63 K9 BOARDING 394294 011716 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 149.63 402146 2/25/2016 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 4,215.07 VEHICLE REPAIRS 394295 14770 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,215.07 402147 2/25/2016 101091 ZIEGLER INC 39.04 PIN ASSEMBLIES 394296 PC001747264 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 884.26 GENERATOR REPAIR 394431 SW050251077 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 923.30 402148 2/25/2016 102500 ZIMMERMAN, TIM 82.00 SAFETY BOOTS 394297 021716 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 82.00 402149 2/25/2016 136225 TIN FISH BRAEMAR PARK 2,151.81 MEETING FOOD 394720 ED22916 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 2,151.81 475,503.96 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 351,167.65 124,336.31 475,503.96 e Di c o f C.I ' vitr'' ager f - R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/24/2016 11:32:46 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 2/25/2016 - 2/25/2016 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 197,665.97 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 5,473.35 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 400.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 53,564.57 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,700.47 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,345.94 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 193.83 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 27,688.90 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 11,998.15 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 13,582.13 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,276.98 05800 LIQUOR FUND 62,813.58 05900 UTILITY FUND 76,015.80 06930 STORM SEWER FUND 16,784.29 Report Totals 475,503.96 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procfldIres de R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2757 3/3/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 38.40 394620 1976117 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 28.80 394857 1979131 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 67.20 2758 3/3/2016 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 10.74- CREDIT ON ART CENTER ACCOUNT 394827 143509CREDIT 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 216.85 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 394744 143637 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 206.11 2769 3/3/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 122.14 COFFEE 394844 1215330 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 122.14 2760 3/3/2016 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 476.00 ERF GRANT 394800 23271309.02-11 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 476.00 2761 3/3/2016 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 120.00 SKATE LACES 00002310 394985 1000502 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 383.24 SKATES 00002310 394984 1000503 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,591.00 SKATES 00002310 394986 1000549 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,094.24 2762 3/3/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 536.20 394627 52369700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 56.39 394632 52369900 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 937.09 394631 52370000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 748.85 394628 52370100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.55 394871 52460400 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 61.30 394869 52460500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 179.10 394868 52460700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.55 394866 52460900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 14.49 394630 93440900 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 75.14 394633 93501100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 391.41 394629 93501200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 38.07 394870 93532200 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 111.66 394867 93532300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,222.80 2763 3/3/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 — Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2763 3/3/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued... 130.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 394577 WO-179904-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 49.52 BINDERS 394578 WO-180263-1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 97.84 NAME BADGES 394988 WO-180796-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 277.54 2764 3/3/2016 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 7,298.00 PICKLEBALL COURT 394801 0187341 47095.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ROSLAND PK - PICKLEBALL COURTS 7,298.00 2765 3/3/2016 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 124.32 OCE MAINTENANCE 394803 988626665 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 124.32 2766 3/3/2016 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 678.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES 394992 518907 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 205.00 BACKPACK SPRAYER 394991 518908 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 883.00 2767 3/3/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 171.34 394889 248620 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 171.34 2768 3/3/2016 104020 DALCO 235.71 TOWELS, DISINFECTANT, CLEANER 394806 2989701 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 161.55 WIPES 394805 2989703 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 397.26 2769 3/3/2016 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 1,057.50 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 394768 50483 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,057.50 2770 3/3/2016 131734 HORWITZ INC, 15,000.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394974 RETAINAGE 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 15,000.00 2771 3/3/2016 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 1,909.36 TURN-OUT GEAR 00003695 395003 224048 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,909.36 2772 3/3/2016 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 - 3/3/2016 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 3 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2772 3/3/2016 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. Continued... 854.00 EXTRANET TICKER 395005 JJ5756 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 854.00 2773 3/3/2016 100858 LOGIS 3,831.00 ANNUAL NETWORK WELLNESS CHARGE 394775 41365 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 813.75 IT CONSULTING 394776 41424 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,677.50 IT CONSULTING 394777 41449 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 6,322.25 2774 3/3/2016 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 484.05 394929 211643 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 415.43 394928 211644 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 101.15 394927 211645 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,000.63 2775 3/3/2016 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 2,685.97 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 1160.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE 50.14 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5110.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 38.07 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5210.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 67.29 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5310.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT POOL ADMINISTRATION 196.53 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5410.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 191.27 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5510.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ARENAADMINISTRATION 52.86 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5552.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 118.88 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5710.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 78.35 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5760.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 146.01 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5820.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT 50TH STREET GENERAL 334.71 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5860.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 381.01 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5840.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,014.56 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5902.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 144.35 AUDIT SERVICES 394815 39088 5932.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GENERAL STORM SEWER 5,500.00 2776 3/3/2016 103944 MED COMPASS 842.00 MEDICAL EXAMS 395009 28737 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 842.00 2777 3/3/2016 101483 MENARDS 13.31 PARTS FOR PRESSURE WASHER 00001482 394816 6950 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 9.34 BOX, SWITCH, COVER 00005069 394602 7063 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.65 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2777 2778 3/3/2016 3/3/2016 101483 MENARDS 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY Continued... 97.70 394780 38114 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 387.70 394780 38114 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 485.40 2779 3/3/2016 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 991.36 TABLE COVERS 394781 384150 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 495.69 TABLE COVERS 395014 384959 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,487.05 2780 3/3/2016 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 52.00 UNIFORMS 00005604 394590 NIA8814E 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 626.75 UNIFORMS 00005604 394590 N1A8814E 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 678.75 2781 3/3/2016 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 MAR 2016 SERVICES 395015 3921 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 658.75 2782 3/3/2016 119486 PARAGON BLACK DIRT 2,475.00 SPRING SWEEPINGS 395044 6363 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 2499.00 FALL STREET SWEEPINGS 394607 6364 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,430.00 SPRING SWEEPINGS 394608 6365 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,464.00 FALL SWEEPINGS 394609 6366 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 9,868.00 2783 3/3/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 566.13 LINERS, MOP HEADS, TOWELS 00002125 394783 8857 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 98.28 VVYPALL VVIPERS 394786 8863 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 995.09 LINERS, CUPS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00002309 395030 8864 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 150.80 LINERS 394785 8871 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 269.12 BIRTHDAY PLATES 394784 8875 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,079.42 2784 3/3/2016 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC. 16,003.87 CAMERAS 395085 73467 5500.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT ICEARENA BALANCE SHEET 16,003.87 2785 3/3/2016 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 - 3/3/2016 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 5 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2785 3/3/2016 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. Continued... 473.50 SQUEEGEES, SPREADER CLOTHS 394787 0059269-1N 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 473.50 2786 3/3/2016 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 9,835.19 BACKFLOW PROTECTION 00001496 394820 67960 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 9,835.19 2787 3/3/2016 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 108.50 BUSINESS CARDS 394613 89600 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 108.50 2788 3/3/2016 104672 SPRINT 16.81 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.81 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 44.43 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 49.31 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 79.98 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.05 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 206.56 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 253.50 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 16.90 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 218.52 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.81 ACCT 873184124 394614 159 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,003.68 2789 3/3/2016 101015 STREICHERS 1,007.50 BALL VEST 395087 11175420 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.99 GLOVES 395088 11182804 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 24.99 GLOVES 394841 11193602 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,072.48 2790 3/3/2016 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2,168.32 BRIDGE INSPECTIONS 394826 002016000156 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 2,168.32 2791 3/3/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 572.00 394710 0145328-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 553.42 394709 0145329-IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 176.25 394711 0145330-1N 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 92.50 395066 0145496-IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2791 3/3/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA Continued... 132.00 395067 0145497-IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 200.50 394961 0145827-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 132.00 394959 0145829-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 71.25 394960 0145830-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 106.00 394962 0145833-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,035.92 2792 3/3/2016 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,636.13 CONCESSION PRODUCT 394795 44803792 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,636.13 2793 3/3/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,286.85 394714 417611-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD 111.4NE 50TH ST SELLING 280.95 394713 417743-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 691.55 394712 417810-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 647.55 395068 418187-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 376.40 394963 418325-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,635.10 394964 418326-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,918.40 402150 3/3/2016 138023 16 WINS 400.00 INFOGRAPHIC DESIGN 395036 432 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 400.00 402151 3/3/2016 129458 ACME TOOLS 700.00 DRAWER UNIT 00005065 394576 3969613 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 700.00 402152 3/3/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 82.50 WEDGE 394843 901930174 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 82.50 WEDGE 394842 901948466 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 165.00 402153 3/3/2016 135195 ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP 145.00 JAN 2015 COBRA 394798 33301 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 145.00 402154 3/3/2016 118491 APPLE INC. 173.00 IPAD REPLACEMENT 00004301 394745 4372415350 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 728.00 IPAD REPLACEMENT 00004301 394745 4372415350 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 -- 3/3/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 7 Business Unit 402154 3/3/2016 118491 APPLE INC. Continued... 99.00 IPAD PRO 00004310 394746 4375106220 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 99.00 IPAD PRO 00004310 394746 4375106220 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 318.00 IPAD PRO UPGRADE 00004310 394747 4375354857 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 828.00 IPAD PRO UPGRADE 00004310 394747 4375354857 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,245.00 402155 3/3/2016 137895 ARM REGISTRATION OFFICE 575.00 AG1505 AGGREGATE PRODUCTION 394828 C1AC801KQ2023JU 1261.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 575.00 402166 3/3/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 444.50 394622 3083247 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 875.75 394621 3083248 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 267.50 394859 3084516 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 535.00 394861 3084517 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 727.00 394860 3084518 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,211.25 394862 3084519 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,259.50 394858 3084520 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 38.25 394623 336208 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19.08- 394864 337507 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8.48- 394865 337508 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 15.68- 394863 337509 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 12.72- 394625 3381360 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8.52- 394624 338137 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,294.27 402157 3/3/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 105.98 BACK UP BATTERIES 00001460 394799 018-397420 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 29.70 BATTERIES 394829 018-397559 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 135.68 402158 3/3/2016 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 257.00 394626 6269 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 257.00 402159 3/3/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 360.00 PIZZA 394987 4621355 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 360.00 402160 3/3/2016 125139 BERNICK'S R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402160 3/3/2016 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 1,152.66 394635 280133 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 231.72 394634 280134 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 313.90 395047 281366 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,698.28 402161 3/3/2016 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 103.41 THERMAL PAPER 394845 022516 5210.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 103.41 402162 3/3/2016 138010 BOB THE WEBSITE BUILDER 1,072.50 WEBSITE REDESIGN 394748 4035 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,072.50 402163 3/3/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 816.00 394636 132048 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 276.40 394637 132067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE VERNON SELLING 400.01 395048 132169 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 355.00 394872 132177 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,847.41 402164 3/3/2016 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 310.53 PHOTOS 394802 2070 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 416.67 PHOTOS 394802 2070 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 84.27 PHOTOS 394802 2070 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 84.27 PHOTOS 394802 2070 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 84.28 PHOTOS 394802 2070 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 207.35 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOS 394989 2075 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 204.52 PHOTO SHOOTS 394846 2076 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,391.89 402165 3/3/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 73.15 394879 1080348937 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,403.69 394639 1080436111 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,039.02 394638 1080436112 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 585.20 394640 1080436113 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 38.65 394645 1080436154 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 16,533.54 394644 1080436155 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,363.35 394642 1080436156 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,755.60 394643 1080436157 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 258.30 394641 1080437124 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 - 3/3/2016 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 9 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO4 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402165 3/3/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 78.58 394874 1080438759 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,494.37 394873 1080438760 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 226.35 394875 1080438761 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 369.40 394877 1080438762 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,097.25 394878 1080438763 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,907.55 394876 1080438814 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,429.46 394884 1080438815 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,755.60 394883 1080438817 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 508.63 394882 1080438818 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,308.75 395049 1080438819 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.27 395050 1080438821 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,509.48 395051 1080438822 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 295.52 395052 1080438823 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 725.75 394880 1080438935 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 126.30 394881 1080438936 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 17.71- 394885 2080122097 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 138.96- 394646 2080122099 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 41,763.09 402166 3/3/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 1,730.15 394649 1090528193 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,980.15 394647 1090528194 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,865.70 394648 1090529072 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,576.30 394887 1090530761 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 48.60 394886 1090530762 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,200.90 402167 3/3/2016 103290 CALIBRE PRESS INC. 209.00 TRAINING - MARK BIERMAIER 394830 36872 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 209.00 TRAINING - CHAD ANDERSON 394831 36911 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 418.00 402168 3/3/2016 134674 CAPITAL CITY GLASS INC. 184.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394968 7374 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 184.00 402169 3/3/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 30.80 394651 00011129 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19.50 394653 00011133 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,850.70 394650 825997 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402169 3/3/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES Continued... 336.30 394888 831178 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 388.80 394654 831829 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,348.65 394652 831889 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,974.75 402170 3/3/2016 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 1,000.00 HOME ENERGY VISITS 394804 13511 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 1,000.00 402171 3/3/2016 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 11,541.53 10437426-9 394990 10437426-2/16 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 6,507.65 5563827-4 394579 5563827-2/16 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 4,451.86 5584304-9 394751 5584304-2/18/16 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 65.14 5584310-6 394750 5584310-2/16 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 20.12 5590919-6 394749 5590919-2/16 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 177.57 5596524-8 394847 5596524-2/16 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,364.06 8034001-1 394580 8034001-2/16 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 61.89 9546705-6 395037 9546705-2/16 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 25,189.82 402172 3/3/2016 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 PHONE SERVICE/INTERNET 394752 COM-0808 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 394753 COM-0815 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 200.00 402173 3/3/2016 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 199.84 00086676-0330288022 394754 330288022-2/16 5310.6189 SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION 199.84 402174 3/3/2016 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 252.00 COFFEE, COCOA 394993 0750356-IN 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 252.00 402175 3/3/2016 120433 COMCAST 142.75 8772 10 614 0540372 394755 540372-2/16 5552.6188 TELEPHONE SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 142.75 402176 3/3/2016 131697 COMMERCIAL DOOR SYSTEMS INC. 4,912.10 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394969 4 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 4,912.10 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 — Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402176 402177 3/3/2016 3/3/2016 131697 COMMERCIAL DOOR SYSTEMS INC. 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES Continued... 1,163.68 UNIFORMS 395069 43153 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,163.68 402178 3/3/2016 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 128.00 JAN 2016 WASHES 394581 441521 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 128.00 402179 3/3/2016 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 854.00 REPLACE VESTIBULE MOTOR 00002127 394756 3082079 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 854.00 402180 3/3/2016 105160 DAKOTA UNLIMITED 4,202.30 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394971 2 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 17,026.85 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394970 FENCING 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 21,229.15 402181 3/3/2016 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 27.12 650487671 394757 650487671-2/16 5510.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 27.12 402182 3/3/2016 136484 DIESEL, MIKE 128.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 394852 022416 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 128.00 402183 3/3/2016 130096 DIGITAL LIGHTING SYSTEMS INC. 50.00 LIGHTING 394759 22421 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 50.00 402184 3/3/2016 121103 DIRECTV 90.82 394760 27826771316 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 90.82 402185 3/3/2016 132377 DIVISION 9 TILE INC. 494.00 PAMELA PARK IMPROVEMENTS 395070 RETAINAGE 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 494.00 402186 3/3/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 335.00 TRANSPORTATION STUDY NOTICE 394832 307995 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402186 3/3/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. Continued... 126.50 AD FOR BID 394761 310264 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 161.00 AD FOR BID 394762 310265 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 138.00 AD FOR BID 394763 310266 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 92.00 PUBLISH ASSESSMENT NOTICE 394764 310267 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 852.50 402187 3/3/2016 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 180.00 STATE OF THE COMMUNITY 394582 36668 1130.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 180.00 402188 3/3/2016 103594 EDINALARM INC. 246.53 ALARM SERVICE REPAIR 394848 103525 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 246.53 402189 3/3/2016 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 165.87 394890 5216 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 165.87 394891 5232 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 331.74 402190 3/3/2016 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 418.80 394655 W-1372700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 418.80 402191 3/3/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 31.00- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 395072 030915 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.94- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 395073 070515 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.71 BATTERY 395071 1-Z06018 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 200.65 BATTERIES 394583 1-Z06975 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.42 402192 3/3/2016 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,228.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 394853 022416 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,228.00 402193 3/3/2016 122549 FARNER-BOCKEN COMPANY 1,046.41 CONCESSION PRODUCT 394765 4620795 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,046.41 402194 3/3/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 503.71 METERS FOR RESALE 00001495 394807 0180980 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 — 3/3/2016 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402194 3/3/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS Continued... 503.71 402195 3/3/2016 135048 FIELDTURF USA INC. 1,282.00 RETAINAGE 394972 638828 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 1,282.00 402196 3/3/2016 131188 FIRST-SHRED 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 394994 175062 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.80 394995 176362 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.60 402197 3/3/2016 101603 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO. 316.20 394656 32036 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 316,20 402198 3/3/2016 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 29.25 BOLTS 394584 19668 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 29.25 402199 3/3/2016 105072 FLYNN, MARY 7.30 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 394766 022216 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 100.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 394766 022216 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 107.30 402200 3/3/2016 134495 FOCAL POINT FIXTURES INC. 915.45 RETAINAGE 394973 5188 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 915.45 402201 3/3/2016 138016 FOSSEY, BEN 10.00 OVERPAID FOR SOFTBALL TEAM 394996 REFUND 1600.4390.58 ADULT SOFTBALL PARKADMIN. GENERAL 10.00 402202 3/3/2016 134640 FROILAND, PAUL 204.39 UNIFORM PURCHASE 394767 022316 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 204.39 402203 3/3/2016 102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. 15,398.27 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 395074 INTERLACHEN 07111.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5-111 INTERLACHEN BLVD WALK 15,398.27 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402203 402204 3/3/2016 3/3/2016 102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION Continued... 100.54 TAPE, WAX, MOUTHGUARDS 394997 90399 5510.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENAADMINISTRATION 153.00 SKATE SHARPENING 394998 90406 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 253.54 402205 3/3/2016 134210 GOPHER BEARING 375.70 HVAC BELTS 394769 6982641 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 375.70 402206 3/3/2016 103811 GORSHE, MICHAEL 2,786.22 DUTY DISABILITY 394808 021816 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 2,786.22 402207 3/3/2016 130461 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC. 13,150.00 NEOGOV SERVICES 394833 INV17164 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 13,150.00 402208 3/3/2016 101103 GRAINGER 43.52 STORAGE CLIPBOARD 00005118 394585 9024594393 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.77 NEOPRENE RUBBER 00005018 394586 9024645823 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 68.64 MARKING PAINT 00001480 394809 9026825134 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 31.46 COPPER 00005018 394587 9027397984 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.06 RATCHET REPAIR KIT 00005018 394588 9029710887 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 216.45 402209 3/3/2016 120201 GRANICUS INC. 500.00 SPEAK UP EDINA 394834 73870 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 590.00 WEBSTREAMING 394834 73870 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 394835 73871 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 590.00 394835 73871 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 394836 73872 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 590.00 394836 73872 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 3,270.00 402210 3/3/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,125.75 394657 MN00000745 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 122.25 395053 MN00001036 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,248.00 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 — 3/3/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 15 Business Unit 402211 3/3/2016 100785 GREUPNER, JOE Continued... 304.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 394854 022416 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 304.00 402212 3/3/2016 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 816.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 394855 022416 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 816.00 402213 3/3/2016 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 1,422.44 OCE INK AND PRINTER HEADS 394810 322568 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1,422.44 402214 3/3/2016 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 27.81 PILOT LIGHTASSEMBLY 00001419 395038 154472-1 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 27.81 402215 3/3/2016 103835 HANRAHAN, BRIAN 260.00 MNIAAI CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 394999 022316 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 260.00 402216 3/3/2016 130116 HARRIS CONTRACTING COMPANY 2,245.50 HVAC CONTROLS UPDATE 395039 83790 450005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTRALIZED HVAC CONTROLS 2,245.50 402217 3/3/2016 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,521.19 CHEMICALS 00005285 394589 3840787 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,521.19 402218 3/3/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,170.54 RADIO FEES 394770 1000069979 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,170.54 402219 3/3/2016 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 336.00 DISPLAYS FOR ICE ARENA 00004307 394771 56841080 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 672.00 MONITORS FOR DISPATCH 00004307 394771 56841080 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6911 1,008.00 402220 3/3/2016 138022 HITCHNER, OLIVIA 80.00 ART CLASS REFUND 395040 REFUND 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 80.00 R55CKR2 LOGISIO1 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 3/3/2016 - Doc No Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402221 3/3/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued.. 521.00 394660 810673 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 394659 810687 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 790.50 394658 810827 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 933.75 394892 811639 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 479.50 394893 811859 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,579.50 395055 812010 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 58.00 395054 812011 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,392.25 402222 3/3/2016 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 372.24 TOOLS 395041 021216 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 372.24 402223 3/3/2016 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 528.55 POOL LIFT BATTERY 00002135 394772 160210002 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 319.98 CHLORINE, HYPOCHLORITE 00002135 395000 160210009 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 101.60 POLE ATTACHMENT 394773 160211013 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 950.13 402224 3/3/2016 130873 HUSNIK, MATT 176.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 395042 022316 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 176.97 402225 3/3/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 325.00 394661 36814 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 224.50 395057 36845 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,074.75 395056 37040 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,624.25 402226 3/3/2016 131794 INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 1,300.00 LEAD MONITORING 395001 00017574 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE 1,300.00 402227 3/3/2016 119808 INTEGRA 27.74 PHONE SERVICE 394774 13661066 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 27.74 402228 3/3/2016 131805 IRSA VIDEO 825.00 MIC TRANSMITTERS, POUCHES 395002 1296 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 825.00 R55CKR2 LOGISIO1 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402228 402229 3/3/2016 3/3/2016 131805 100828 IRSA VIDEO JERRY'S FOODS Continued... 11.97 395004 013116 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 126.26 395004 013116 1556.6106 MEETING EXPENSE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 138.23 402230 3/3/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5.01- 394666 2440012 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 187.20- 394667 2458472 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 154.00- 394901 2458473 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,352.12 394665 2467724 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 62.25 394662 2467727 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,992.84 394664 2467728 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17.55 394719 2467729 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,140.00 394663 2467730 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,699.20 394896 2467755 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 105.80 394894 2467756 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 911.90 394897 2467758 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 143.50 394895 2467759 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,735.77 394900 2467763 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17.55 394898 2467764 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 133.60 394899 2467768 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 18,965.87 402231 3/3/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 583.08 394672 5374920 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,200.21 394673 5374921 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 691.02 394671 5374922 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 816.18 394670 5374923 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 733.84 394669 5374924 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,443.25 394674 5374926 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .58 394680 5374927 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,586.11 394675 5374928 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 528.92 394678 5374929 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,120.67 394677 5374930 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,027.05 394676 5374931 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 200.71 395058 5374932 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,091.39 394679 5374933 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 66.82 394668 5374934 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,145.93 394682 5374938 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402231 3/3/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,582.26 394681 5374939 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,419.61 394683 5374941 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 198.74 394916 5380049 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,414.61 394911 5380050 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 51.16 394904 5380051 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.32 394910 5380052 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.16 394902 5380053 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 293.57 394915 5380054 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 664.14 394917 5380055 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,649.52 394914 5380056 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3.48 394921 5380057 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,032.82 394913 5380058 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 307.85 394918 5380059 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,290.03 394903 5380061 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,374.79 394912 5380062 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 692.54 394908 5380063 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 50.32 394907 5380064 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 67.50 394906 5380065 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,447.96 394909 5380066 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,045.98 394905 5380067 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,413.59 394922 5380071 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 38.41 394924 5380072 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 418.80 394925 5380073 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,220.91 394919 5380074 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,893.32 394920 5380075 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,044.78 394923 5380077 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 42.56- 394684 563883 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .48- 394926 563885 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 56,812.89 402232 3/3/2016 136126 KADERLIK, NATE 10.42 MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 395043 022416 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 10.42 402233 3/3/2016 102080 KATTREH, ANN 621.01 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 395075 2015 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 621.01 402234 3/3/2016 130789 KATZ, DAVID 350.00 ABOUT TOWN HISTORICAL COLUMN 394811 721 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # 3/3/2016 — 3/3/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402234 3/3/2016 130789 KATZ, DAVID Continued... 350.00 402235 3/3/2016 138015 KLUENSNER, MARY & AL 139.50 RED WING TRIP REFUND 394849 022216 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 139.50 402236 3/3/2016 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 388.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 394856 022416 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 388.00 402237 3/3/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 1,856.93 BULBS, FITTINGS, ADAPTERS 00005064 394591 9303886672 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,856.93 402238 3/3/2016 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,790.00 STORMWATER COALITION 394812 230047 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES-STORM 1,790.00 402239 3/3/2016 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,505.68 LMC GL 000000012880 394813 PAID CLAIM 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,505.68 402240 3/3/2016 132752 LINCO FAB INC. 16,672.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394975 021516 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 16,672.00 402241 3/3/2016 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 484.52 USSS SUPPLIES 395006 022616 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 484.52 402242 3/3/2016 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 1,929.26 CYLINDER 00005058 394593 00057891 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,929.26 CYCLINDER 00005057 394592 00057892 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 576.47 CYLINDER / STEEL CAP 00005084 394594 00057937 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,434.99 402243 3/3/2016 138012 M & M HOME CONTRACTORS INC. 2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 394814 5524 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS COUNTRYSIDE RD 2,500.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 — 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 138012 M & M HOME CONTRACTORS INC. Continued... 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 402243 3/3/2016 402244 3/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 8,346.89 394599 127280 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,577.36 394598 127284 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16,104.31 FUEL 394595 127288 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 704.85 394597 127969 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,396.65 394596 127980 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,574.72 UNLEADED FUEL 395076 17342 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8,340.77 395077 17343 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,804.56 395078 19276 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,430.64 395079 19308 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,245.14 394600 196360 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.12- CREDIT 394601 196609 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,297.83 395080 68367 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,414.34 FUEL 394778 MBINV/00074368 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63,178.94 402245 3/3/2016 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 288.75 HOSTING FEES 395007 216 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 288.75 402246 3/3/2016 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 12,287.00 CONTRACT 394779 0204551-IN 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 13,038.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 395008 0204588-IN 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 25,325.00 402247 3/3/2016 113023 MEGGITT TRAINING SYSTEMS INC. 193.67 COMMUTATION WIRE GUIDES 395010 INV-0070502 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 193.67 402248 3/3/2016 134038 MIDWEST CIVIL CONSTRUCTORS LLC 21,846.97 FINAL PAYMENT NO. 9 395081 HAZELTON RD 01417.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS 21,846.97 402249 3/3/2016 118464 MIDWEST TESTING LLC 430.00 WATER METER TESTING 00001487 394817 3765 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR 430.00 402250 3/3/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 1,140.00 REPLACE STAND PIPE 00001494 394818 35147 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 -- Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402250 3/3/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER Continued... 1,140.00 402251 3/3/2016 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 8.98 WHEEL 00005067 394603 15889 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.98 402252 3/3/2016 101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSN 1,160.00 LEADERSHIP ACADEMY 394839 4773 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,160.00 402253 3/3/2016 101899 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 100.00 HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL FEES 395011 2706000962015 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 100.00 402254 3/3/2016 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 63.00 BALL VALVE 00005031 394604 0112858-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.00 402255 3/3/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 297.00 ANNUAL EVENTS BROCHURES 395012 19679 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 14.66 VEAP STUFFERS 394605 19756 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 14.67 VEAP STUFFERS 394605 19756 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 14.67 VEAP STUFFERS 394605 19756 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 341.00 402256 3/3/2016 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 15,010.30 DISPATCH SYSTEM/EQUIPMENT 00003019 394606 41219588 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 15,010.30 402257 3/3/2016 101796 MPCA 437.50 VIC CLEANUP 394837 770009421 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 250.00 PETROLEUM BROWNFIELDS PROG 394838 8800004528 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 687.50 402258 3/3/2016 138018 MPFF 50.00 CONFERENCE-TOM SCHMITZ 395013 022416 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 402259 3/3/2016 131577 MRA-THE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 1,400.00 131068 MEMBERSHIP 394840 09061081 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402259 3/3/2016 131577 MRA - THE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION Continued... 1,400.00 402260 3/3/2016 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 80,906.60 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394976 RETAINAGE 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 80,906.60 402261 3/3/2016 130988 NEUENDORF, BILL 199.98 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 395082 022916-2015 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 38.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 395082 022916-2015 9232.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 141.90 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 395082 022916-2015 9232.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 370.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 395082 022916-2015 9232.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 18.65 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 395082 022916-2015 9234.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 49.50 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 395082 022916-2015 9238.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 713.92 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 395083 2015 9232.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,531.95 402262 3/3/2016 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 388.50 394930 107825 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,170.00 395059 107826 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,558.50 402263 3/3/2016 134457 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC. 50,000.01 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394977 14 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 50,000.01 402264 3/3/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC. 553.90 STAFF UNIFORMS 395084 979349122 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 553.90 402265 3/3/2016 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH 122.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 394758 022416 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 122.84 402266 3/3/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 96.10 LIGHTING 00001425 394819 94594 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 96.10 402267 3/3/2016 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 144.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 395017 823864813001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 9.29 TAPE DISPENSER 395016 823865031001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402267 402268 3/3/2016 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 101659 ORKIN Continued.., 313/2016 153.70 144.35 2809201 PEST CONTROL 395020 107607385 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 20.00 12557616 PEST CONTROL 395018 12557616-2/16 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 20.00 12557635 PEST CONTROL 395019 12557635-2/16 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 184.35 402269 3/3/2016 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 522.00 394685 16040 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 522.00 402270 3/3/2016 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING 148.91 CATERED FOOD 395021 1084 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 78.15 395022 1085 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 116.78 395023 1086 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 75.15 395024 1087 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 133.17 395025 1088 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 93.31 395026 1088 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 645.47 402271 3/3/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 831.41 394686 8536151-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 473.00 394687 8536152-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 286.45 394931 8537054-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 507.35 394932 8537055-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,249.87 395060 8537063-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,348.08 402272 3/3/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 36.60- 394944 231992 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 171.45 394688 2927917 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 39.28 394691 2931244 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 636.34 394695 2931245 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 291.48 394692 2931246 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 353.63 394697 2931248 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 530.48 394696 2931249 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,312.06 394693 2931252 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 735.94 394689 2931253 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,638,76 394694 2931254 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 - Inv No 3/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402272 3/3/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 52.66 394690 2931405 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 9.28 394940 2934752 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 9.28 394935 2934753 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 327.20 394943 2934754 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 938.76 394938 2934755 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 992.21 394937 2934756 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 783.57 394939 2934757 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,559.68 394942 2934759 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 2,317.61 394941 2934760 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 291.55 394936 2934763 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,059.63 394933 2934764 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 254.60 394934 2934765 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14,268.85 402273 3/3/2016 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC. 50.00 EMS FAXING 395027 116081844 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 395028 416079732 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 750.00 402274 3/3/2016 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 1,844.05 SALT 394610 244460 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,844.05 402275 3/3/2016 134007 PJ TAILORS & CLEANERS 18.00 LAUNDER BLANKET 394611 1261 1400.6201 LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 18.00 402276 3/3/2016 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 394782 335014 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,223.86 402277 3/3/2016 135046 PRESTIGE DRYWALL 1,976.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394978 RETAINAGE 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICEARENA BALANCE SHEET 1,976.00 402278 3/3/2016 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 702.00 NITRILE GLOVES 395029 58173 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 702.00 402279 3/3/2016 105707 RAINBOW INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 — 3/3/2016 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402279 3/3/2016 105707 RAINBOW INC. Continued... 4,488.54 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394979 RETAINAGE 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 4,488.54 402280 3/3/2016 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 16.94 TRANSFORMER 394850 75012 5210.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 423.54 LICENSE 394851 75035 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 442.48 402281 3/3/2016 138017 REGION 2AA 11,116.58 HOCKEY TICKET SALES 395031 022516 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 11,116.58 402282 3/3/2016 117820 REGION 6AA 2,719.79 HOCKEY TICKET SALES 395032 022516 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,719.79 402283 3/3/2016 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 510.00 WNDSHIELD REPAIR 394612 72851 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 510.00 402284 3/3/2016 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 45,632.13 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394980 4520009809 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 45,632.13 402285 3/3/2016 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 923.68 SOFTENER SALT 394788 00329179 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 923.68 402286 3/3/2016 104087 SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS INC. 370.00 SAFETY TRAINING 394821 996 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 370.00 402287 3/3/2016 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 45.66 CABLES, PADLOCKS 395033 022616 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 45.56 402288 3/3/2016 100995 SEH 518.20 54TH ST BID DOCS 394823 310722 10096.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR6 54TH STREET BRIDGE 663.41 54TH ST BID DOCS 394823 310722 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 54.75 54TH ST BID DOCS 394823 310722 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 -- 3/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402288 3/3/2016 100995 SEH Continued... 242.05 54TH ST BID DOCS 394823 310722 04407.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST RECONSTRUCTION 1,192.93 ARDEN PARK BID DOCS 394822 310723 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 674.06 ARDEN PARK BID DOCS 394822 310723 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 1,032.84 ARDEN PARK BID DOCS 394822 310723 03487.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction 537.93 ARDEN PARK BID DOCS 394822 310723 04407.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST RECONSTRUCTION 4,916.17 402289 3/3/2016 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 3,190.50 ANNUAL/JAN/FEB FEES 394824 008816-2/16 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,190.50 402290 3/3/2016 133883 SERVPRO OF EAGAN/APPLE VALLEY 345.41 WATER DAMAGE REPAIRS 395086 4823801 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 345.41 402291 3/3/2016 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 246.00 ACROBAT STANDARD 00004309 394789 B04567219 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 708.00 VEEAM MAINTENANCE 394790 604572203 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 954.00 402292 3/3/2016 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 92.63 HOT DOG BUNS 394791 281042 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 92.63 402293 3/3/2016 132195 SMALL LOT MN 246.27 394945 5945 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 246.27 402294 3/3/2016 136680 SOCIABLE CIDER WERKS LLC 250.00 394698 3078 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 150.00 394946 3154 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 400.00 402295 3/3/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 9.82- 394707 0022435 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.22- 394708 0022436 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3.73 394706 1373614 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,137.60 394703 1378034 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 953.08 394705 1378035 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 449.60 394704 1378036 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 - 3/3/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 27 Business Unit 402295 3/3/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued-. 3,119.40 394700 1378037 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 9,012.65 394702 1378038 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 39.67 394701 1378039 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,859.60 394699 1378040 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 618.40 394952 1380294 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,065.60 394953 1380295 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,540.51 394954 1380296 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 300.80 394951 1380297 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,375.73 395061 1380298 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 524.80 395062 1380299 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 252.30 394955 1380300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,875.39 395065 1380301 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,299.40 395063 1380303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 531.20 395064 1380304 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,737.20 394950 1380305 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,727.60 394947 1380306 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 251.50 394949 1380307 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,686.86 394948 1380308 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 41,345.58 402296 3/3/2016 134925 STACON 871.47 TRANSDUCER 00001432 394825 1N00078553 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 871.47 402297 3/3/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 126.00 394956 9774 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 168.00 394957 9793 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 294.00 402298 3/3/2016 128371 STEINMETZ, ROBERT 498.19 UNIFORM PURCHASE 394792 022216 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 498.19 402299 3/3/2016 138021 STRAUSS, CRAIG 248.46 SPRINKLER HEAD DAMAGES 395046 REIMBURSE 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 248.46 402300 3/3/2016 101756 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC. 2,926.05 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394981 2/18/16STMT 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 2,926.05 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 3/3/2016 -- 3/3/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402300 402301 3/3/2016 3/3/2016 101756 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC. 136860 SYSCO WESTERN MINNESOTA Continued... 406.51 CONCESSION PRODUCT 394793 602170252 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 447.71 CONCESSION PRODUCT 395034 602190511 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 390.07 CONCESSION PRODUCT 395035 602240109 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,244.29 402302 3/3/2016 121517 THIEDE, JOHN 12.77 MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 395045 022416 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 12.77 402303 3/3/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,430.25 394958 1041564 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,430.25 402304 3/3/2016 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 181.88 COPIER USAGE 394794 64327341 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 181.88 402305 3/3/2016 123649 TOWMASTER 194.08 SOLENOID, DIAPHRAM 394615 377427 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 194.08 402306 3/3/2016 101127 TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS INC. 168.76 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394982 FINAL RETENTION 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 168.76 402307 3/3/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 85.04 STEP LADDER 00001424 394617 1145959 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 36.84 POLE SLIP-FITTER 00001426 394618 1146524 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 273.10 WIRE, CONDUIT 00001492 394616 1150452 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 394.98 402308 3/3/2016 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 60.28 BRATS 394796 92851 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 60.28 402309 3/3/2016 130574 WATSON COMPANY 71.52 TRU MOO CHOCOLATE 394797 860647 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 71.52 3/1/2016 11:21:56 Page - 29 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/3/2016 — 3/3/2016 733,874.87 102,361.70 836,236.57 Checks NP ACH Payment Total Payments Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 402309 402310 3/3/2016 3/3/2016 130574 WATSON COMPANY 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 561.00 394717 7069279 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,496.50 394716 7069281 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 631.16 394715 7069339 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 181.16 394966 7070215 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,950.47 394967 7070216 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,200.08 394965 7070217 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,020.37 402311 3/3/2016 129171 VVTG TERRAZZO 8, TILE INC. 1,548.75 EDINA SPORTS DOME 394983 RETAINAGE 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 1,548.75 402312 3/3/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY 53.54 51-5276505-8 394619 490199021 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 53.54 402313 3/3/2016 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 1,575.50 394718 16582 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,575.50 836,236.57 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Finance Direct R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 3/1/2016 11:22:07 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 3/3/2016 - 3/3/2016 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 166,076.66 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 672.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 47,960.22 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 15,010.30 04500 CANDO FUND 2,245.50 05100 ART CENTER FUND 119.40 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 6,994.73 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 267.13 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 3,895.60 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 106,124.51 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 190,930.67 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 9,130.67 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,137.26 05800 LIQUOR FUND 237,729.94 05900 UTILITY FUND 20,244.87 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 10,152.33 05000 RISK MGMT ISF 2,786.22 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 8,263.09 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,427.32 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 18.65 09238 SOUTH DALE 2 DISTRICT 49.50 Report Totals 836,236.57 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and proce • res da 3 Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Joseph M. Abood, General Manager Braemar Golf Course Item Activity: Subject:Request For Purchase - Braemar Golf Course - Toro 3150 Greensmaster Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve request for purchase of a Toro 3150 Greensmaster riding greens mower. INTRODUCTION: Staff is requesting the approval to purchase a new Toro 3150 Greensmaster riding greens mower. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase – Toro 3150 Toro - 3150 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Mayor and Council Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director ⌧ ☐ February 9, 2016 Request for Purchase – Toro 3150 Greensmaster, Braemar Golf Course 2/3/2016 5/4/2016 MTI Distributing $25,193.86 Recommended Quote or Bid: MTI Distributing General Information: This request for purchase is for a Toro 3150 Greensmaster riding greens mower. The current mower is 8 years old. As these mowers age they become unreliable and occasionally develop oil leaks that kill the greens. This mower is used 7 days a week during the golf season. This mower will be purchased through National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance organization (National IPA) which is a nationwide purchasing cooperative designed to be a procurement resource for local and state government agencies, school districts, and non-profits. The price is broken down as follows: Toro Greensmaster 3150 $29,073.20 Trade Toro 3150 -$5,500.00 Sales Tax (6.875%) $1,620.66 Total $25,193.86 This purchase is less than the budgeted CIP project of $29,000. TORO. DISTRIBUTING MTI Distributing Equipment Proposal February 3, 2016 Tom Swenson Braemar Golf Course Expiration Date 5/4/2016 6364 John Harris Drive Minneapolis, MN 55439 NATIONAL IPA PRICING - IPA MEMBER #21694 Qty Model Number Description Price Price Extension 1 04358 Greensmaster 3150-0. $21,746.64 $21,746.64 3 04656 14 BL Cutting Unit $2,153.63 $6,460.89 1 04626 Narrow Wiehle Roller (.200" Spacing) (Set of 3) $865.67 $865.67 TRADE: 1 XX-UE 2008 GR3150, 14 blade model #04357, sin 280000371 ($5,500.00) ($5,500.00) TOTALS Equipment Total $29,073.20 Toro Protection Plus $0.00 Trade Ins ($5,500.00) Estimated Sales/Use Tax $1,620.66 Total $25,193.86 New Toro commercial equipment comes with a two-year manufacturer warranty Equipment delivery at no additional charge Thank you for the opportunity to submit this quote. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting us. Larry Gorman, SCPS Karen Wangensteen Outside Sales Representative Inside Sales Representative 612-877-0830 763-592-5643 MTI Distributing, Inc. • 4830 Azelia Avenue N. #100 • Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 -41W1114 TORO Greensmaster 3150-Q/3250-D RIDING GREENSMOWERS FEATURES Greensmaster 3150-12: • Briggs & Stratton' 18 hp (13.4 kW) air-cooled, gasoline engine • Industry's quietest engine-powered riding greensmower Greensmaster 3250-D: • Kubota D902, 24.8 hp (18.5 kW) 3-cylinder, liquid-cooled, diesel engine • Ample power for any greens or off-greens application; extremely versatile Legendary performance and reliability. The Greensmaster 3150-Q and 3250-D are distinguished for their field-proven performance and exceptional quality of cut. Equipped with patented DPA cutting units for a superior cut and minimal maintenance, convenient controls for easy operation, and ample power to handle any application—it's no wonder these classic models have been trusted over the years to deliver the performance golf courses demand with a putting surface that exceeds expectations. toro.com 4 \vs, 1 Greensmaster' 3150-a Greensmaster 3250-D 4 CaU your Toro distributor at 800-803-8676 ThRO® Greensmaster 3150-0 Specifications* ENGINE FUEL CAPACITY TRACTION DRIVE GROUND SPEED TURF COMPACTION IMPLEMENT DRIVE STEERING ELECTRICAL FEATURES TIRES/WHEELS/PRESSURE BRAKES HYDRAULIC OIL LEAK DETECTION SOUND LEVEL OVERALL DIMENSIONS WIDTH OF CUT REEL SPEED BACKLAPPING CUTTING UNIT SUSPENSION ROPS CERTIFICATION WARRANTY GREENSMASTER 3150-0, MODEL 04358 ty 18 hp (13.4 kW) @3600 rpm, Briggs & Stratton gasoline engine, governed to 2850 rpm high idle, 1650 rpm low idle. Air-cooled. 7 gallon (26.5 liter) capacity; unleaded gasoline. Hydraulic piston pump, closed loop system. 2W0 Parallel Hydrostatic or 3W0 Series Parallel piston pump closed loop system. Foot pedal forward and reverse; infinitely variable. Forward-mowing speed is variable from 2-5 mph (3.2-8 km/h), adjusted by stop on pedal mechanism. Mow speed setting does not affect transport speed. Maximum Greensmaster 315041 transport speed is 8.8 mph (14.4 km/h), may be reduced by adjusting stop in footrest pan without affecting mow speeds. Reverse is 2.5 mph (4.0 km/h) maximum. 8-10 psi (dependent on tire pressure) with operator and cutting units down. Single gear pump, mono valve block, series reel drive to 3 motors. Power steering. Adjustable steering wheel tilt and a 5-position steering arm tilt. CONTROLS/GAUGES Raise/lower-mow lever (joystick). Functional control lever (neutral, mow, transport). Foot operated traction drive and brakes. Hour meter. Hand operated throttle and choke. Mechanical engine speed control. 12-volt lead acid, group size Ul, with 300 minimum cold cranking amps at 0°F and 34 minutes reserve capacity at 85° F/25 amps draw. 16 amp alternator. Ignition switch/key. Seat switch. Harness terminals and fuse slot available for optional lights installation. Three tires: Three 18 x 10.5-8, 4-ply pneumatic tubeless demountable and interchangeable with smooth tread. 8-12 psi front; 8-15 psi rear. Optional Traction Tire (4-ply): P/N 119-3516. Two 6' (15.2 cm) drum type. 7.5 gallon (28.4 liter) tank with internal baffle. 1.0 gallon (3.8 liter) auxiliary tank. Equipped with Turf Guardian T'' leak detection system. 82 OA) at operator's ear under normal conditions. Wheel Tread: 49.5' (149.9 cm), Wheel Base: 47' (119 crn), Length: 90° (229 cm), Width: 69.7' 1177 cm) wheels, Height: 74.5 /189 cm), Weight: 1,087 lbs. 1493 kg). 59' (150 cm) Approximately 1975 RPM at 2850 engine RPM. Adjustable. Standard equipment. Cutting units are completely free-floating, each attaching to the tractor by direct pull links and lifted by a centered lift arm. Baskets are supported by carrier frames that are ground following. Cutting unit floatation is unaffected by basket content. Grass baskets are all interchangeable and accessible from the front of the machine. Roll Over Protection System standard. Certified to meet ANSI specification 871.4-2012 and European CE standards with appropriate kits installed. Two-year limited warranty. Refer to the Operator's Manual for further details. TRACTOR HEIGHT OF CUT (HOC) RANGE REEL WELDMENT REEL BEARINGS MAINTENANCE REEL DRIVE FRAME AGGRESSIVENESS BEDKNIFE BEDKNIFE ADJUSTMENT FRONT & REAR ROLLERS GRASS SHIELD TOTAL WEIGHT 0 BLADE DPA CUTTING UNITS, 04652 11-BLADE DPA CUTTING UNITS, 04654 14-BLADE CUTTING UNITS, 04656 These cutting units will mount on any Toro riding Greensmaster (excluding Greensmaster TriFtex" 33xx/34xx series). Cutting height is adjusted on front roller by two vertical screws and held by two locking cap screws. Bench HOC range is .062-.297" (1.6-7.5 mm). With high HOC kit, range is .285-1" (7.3-25.4 mm). Effective HOC may vary depending on turf conditions and bedknife installed. Reels are 5' (13 cm) in diameter, 21" (53.3 cm) in length. High carbon steel blades are welded to 5 stamped steel spiders, and heat treated. The reel is ground for diameter and concentricity, and relief ground. Two stainless steel ball bearings, 30 -4-.1 mm inside diameter slip fit onto reel shaft retained by internally splined threaded insert. Low drag seals/slingers for added protection with o-ring seated motor and counterweight. Reel position maintained by a wave washer with no adjusting nut. No grease zerks, sealed bearing design eliminates daily maintenance. The reel weldment shaft is a 1.375' (35 mm) diameter tube with internally splined threaded insert. Precision machined, die-cast aluminum cross member with two bolt-on die-cast aluminum side plates. Aggressiveness stays constant throughout the life of the reel. Patented design. Replaceable single edged EdgeMae Microcut Bedknife is standard. Dual screw, indexed 'click" adjustment to the reel; detects corresponding to .0007' (.018 mm) bedknife movement for each position. Front: Not included with cutting unit, purchased separately. Option between full, narrow-spaced and wide-spaced Wiehle roller. Rear: Steel full, 2" (5.1 cm) diameter with sealed bearings and through-shaft. Non-adjustable shield with adjustable cut-off bar to improve grass discharge from reel in wet conditions. 8-blade: 72 lbs. (32.7 kg) with aluminum Wiehle Roller. 11-blade: 75 lbs. (34 kg) with aluminum Narrow Wiehle Roller. 14-blade: 78 lbs. 135 kg) with aluminum Wiehle Roller. 'Specifications and design subject to change without notice. Products depicted in this literature are for demonstration purposes only. Actual products offered for sale may vary in use, design, required attachments and safety features. Consult your local Toro Distributor. 2016 Toro Commercial Equipment Guide 16-003-1 Rev. 1/16 2 The Greensmaster 3150-0 is manufactured in Tomah, WI ISO 9002 Certified Plant. Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Joseph M. Abood, General Manager Braemar Golf Course Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase - Braemar Golf Course – Toro Groundsmaster 4500 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve request for purchase of a Toro 4500 Groundsmaster large area rough mower. INTRODUCTION: Staff is requesting the approval to purchase a Toro 4500 Groundsmaster large area rough mower. This is a budgeted item within the 2016 CIP. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2016 Request for Purchase 4500 Toro 4500 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Mayor and Council Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director ☐ ⌧ February 9, 2016 Request for Purchase – Toro Groundsmaster 4500, Braemar Golf Course 2/3/2016 5/4/2016 MTI Distributing $54,336.17 Recommended Quote or Bid: MTI Distributing General Information: This request for purchase is for a Toro 4500 Groundsmaster large area rough mower. This large area rough mower is capable of mowing up to 6.5 acres per hour. The trade in mower was purchased in 2008 making it 9 years old in 2016. This rough mower is used daily to mow the large areas of taller grass at the golf course. This improves the golfers experience by making the grass shorter and easier to play. Customer’s feedback shows that long rough slows down play and makes golf too difficult. This mower has a unique deck design that uses a roller to stripe the grass and doesn't scalp on uneven terrain. This mower will be purchased through National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance organization (National IPA) which is a nationwide purchasing cooperative designed to be a procurement resource for local and state government agencies, school districts, and non-profits. The price is broken down as follows: Toro Groundsmaster 4500 $61,340.86 Trade Toro 4000 -$10,500.00 Sales Tax (6.875%) $3,496.31 Total $54,336.17 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 This request for purchase is $2,336 over budget. The Toro 3150 request for purchase is $3,806 below budget. This $3,806 excess from the Toro 3150 request for purchase will be used to cover the shortfall on the Toro 4500 request for purchase. TORO. frit! OISTnIBUTING 0.101WWWUMWILW MTI Distributing Equipment Proposal February 3, 2016 Tom Swenson Braemar Golf Course Expiration Date 5/4/2016 6364 John Harris Drive Minneapolis, MN 55439 NATIONAL IPA PRICING - IPA MEMBER #21694 Qty Model Number Description Price Price Extension 1 30881 Groundsmaster 4500-D (Tier 4 Final Compliant) $61,340.86 $61,340.86 TRADE: 1 XX-UE 2008 6M4000 model #30410, sin 280000126 ($10,500.00) ($10,500.00) TOTALS Equipment Total $61,340.86 Toro Protection Plus $0.00 Trade Ins ($10,500.00) Estimated Sales/Use Tax $3,495.31 Total $54,336.17 New Toro commercial equipment comes with a two-year manufacturer warranty Equipment delivery at no additional charge Thank you for the opportunity to submit this quote. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting us. Larry Gorman, SCPS Karen Wangensteen Outside Sales Representative Inside Sales Representative 612-877-0830 763-592-5643 MTI Distributing, Inc. • 4830 Azelia Avenue N. #100 • Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 • 55 hp Yanmar engine. Tier 4 Final Compliant, turbo-diesel engine • Patented Contour- Plus rotary cutting units for virtually no scalping • Full-length striping rear rollers • 9' and 12.5' width of cut • 6.5" cutting unit overlap to eliminate streaking • Smart Power- - optimized mowing in all conditions • SmartCoor system with auto reversing cooling fan • 4-Way Adjustable Seat and An- Ride Suspension • Integrated ControlHutr with fingertip electronic controls • InfoCenter" displays simple operating info while monitoring machine health FEATURES TORO, Groundsmaster 4500-D/4700-D CONTOUR ROTARY MOWERS The Groundsmaster 4500-D and 4700-0 continue to provide the clean quality of cut of a reel mower but with the maintenance ease of a rotary. Toro's exclusive new SmartCool system keeps your machine on the job and moving forward. Before things get too hot, SmartCool briefly reverses the cooling fan to blast chaff and debris from the intake screens. Smart? You know it. Cool? Definitely! With a 55 hp turbo-diesel under the hood and the new Smart Power technology that maximizes power to the Contour Plus cutting decks, the Groundsmaster 4500-D and 4700-D are an unprecedented blend of powerful productivity and refined results. toro.com/contour More production, same extraordinary cut. • Full-time. bi-directional 41(10 +up— - • - „f • 4-wheel drive traction assist (optional) • Reliable planetary gear wheel drive system Groundsmaster' 4500-0 19111106111111:, • 4 SMART470WER. -4 • ri 11F — ..r • - Groundsmaster' 4700-0 r•qi - •• "' _.•• Call your Toro distributor at 800-803-8676 Groundsmaster° 4500-D & 4700-D Specifications* 2 The Groundsmaster 4500-0 and 47110-0 are manufactured in Tomah, WI ISO 9002 Cert Ted Plant. Specifications and design subject to change without notice. Dependent on operator and turf conditions, assumes 85% efficiency for overlaps and turns Certification complies with ANSI 871.4-1999 and applicable CE directives. Warranty: Two-year limited warranty. Refer to operator's manual for further details. 2015 Toro Commercial Equipment Guide 15-003T Rev. 2115 GROUNDSMASTER 4500-D, TIER 4 DIESEL, MODEL 30881 GROUNDSMASTER 4700-0, TIER 4 DIESELMODEL 30882 Yanmar° 4-cylinder liquid-cooled, turbo-charged diesel. Power: 55 hp (41.1 kW) gross power at rated speed of 2700 rpm. Torque peak: 125 ft-lbs (169 Nm) @2000 rpm. Displacement: 127 cu. in. (2.1 liters). EPA Tier IV Anal Compliant. Dry, replaceable primary and safety elements. Rear-mount, single pass, 7-row, 6.3 fins per inch, 13 quart (12.3 liters) capacity. 22 gallons (83 liters) diesel fuel. Biodiesel-Ready for use up to B-20 (20% biodiesel and 80% petroleum blend). Parallel hydrostatic, closed loop system with full-time 4W0 forward/reverse in low (mow) and high (transport) range with optional full-time, automatic traction flow divider (forward only) (Model 30876). Variable displacement piston pump with electronic servo control powers dual speed piston motor drive into double reduction planetary in front, and mechanical axle in rear. Smart Power' feature controls traction speed to maintain optimal cutting blade speed. 8.25 gallon (31.3 liter) capacity with 10 micron remote spin-on filter, 9 row single pass cooler with tilt out for cleaning. Variable speed hydraulic fan drive with automatic (based on coolant and oil temps) and manual reversing capabilities. Diagnostics pressure test ports: forward and reverse traction, deck circuit 1 & 2, reverse 4W0, lift, steering, traction charge, and counter balance. Transport: 0-13 mph (0-21 km/h) forward, 0-6.2 mph (0-10 km/h) reverse. Mow: 0-7 mph (0-11.3 km/h) forward, 0-3.5 mph (0-5.6 km/h) reverse. Front: 290 14-15, 6-ply ultra-tread. Rear: 20 x 10-10, 4-ply multi-trac tread. All welded formed-steel frame with integral tie-down anchors. Mechanically actuated, internal wet disc brakes on input to each planetary drive. Individual foot-operated steering brake control of left and right wheel. Lock pedals together and latch to engage parking brake. Premium seat with adjustments for operator weight via air ride suspension, seat fore/aft position, seat back angle, arm rest height and retractable seat belt. Power steering with dedicated power source, tilt steering. InfoCenter' System: Onboard LCD display shows gauges, alerts/faults, service reminders, electrical system diagnostics. Indicates fuel level, coolant temperature, intake temperature, low oil pressure, alternator, engine hours, engine rpm, hydraulic oil temperature, and voltage. Ignition switch, throttle switch, mow/transport range selection switch, PTO switch, light switch. Foot-operated traction pedal, individual foot-operated steering brake control of left and right wheels with parking brake lock. One 2-position switch (GM 4500-0). Three 2-position switches (GM 4700-0). 12-volt, 650 cold cranking amps battery, 40 amp alternator. Overload protection with automotive type fuses. Prevents engine from starting unless traction pedal is in neutral and deck is disengaged. If operator leaves seat with deck engaged, engine stops. Mowing only permitted in low range. Engine stops if parking brake engaged and traction pedal colic neutral. Beverage holder, radio holder, 12-volt power point, storage box (tools, jackets, golf balls, etc.), seatbelt. Standard. 2-post standard. GM 4500-D GM 4700-D Overall length wIdecks down 145.8" (370 cm) 145.8° (370 cm) Overall width, lowered/raised 112.8° (206 cm)188.3" (224 cm) 153.8' (391 cm1/88.3" (224 cm) Height w/2-post ROPS 85' (216 cm) 85' (216 cm) Wheelbase 67.5" (172 cm) 67.5° 1172 cm) Track Width, front/rear 88.3" (224 cm)155.5" (141 cm) 88.3' (224 cm)/55.5" (141 cm) Ground clearance 6" (15.3 cm) 6' (15.3 cm) 4400 lbs. (1995 kg) - with full fluids. 4950 lbs. (2245 kg) - with full fluids. Acres per Gallon -3.4 Mowing Range -13.8 hours Fuel consumption - 1.6 Gal/Hr (6.06 L/Hr) Acres per Gallon -4.4 Mowing Range -12.9 hours Fuel consumption - 1.7 Gal/Hr (6.44 L/Hr.) Complies with American National Standards Institute (ANSI B71.4-2012) and applicable ISO EN 5395 (CE) standards (machine directive 89/392, 91/368, 93/44, 84/538, 891336) requirements. Two-year limited. Atomic mulching blades (107-0235-03), white sunshade (30349), red sunshade (30552), operator fan kit (110-8804), 4WD flow divider kit (30876), rear roller scraper kit, 2 post ROPS extension, windscreen, 90 amp alternator kit (115-8473), mulching kit (30836). CUTTING UNITS Five Contour" Plus 27" (68.6 em), rear-discharge rotary cutting units w/rear rollers. Seven Contour" Plus 27 (68.6 cm), rear-discharge rotary cutting units w/rear rollers. 109' (277 cm), overlap 6.5" (16.5 cm), overhang 10.4' (26.4 cm). Overall: 150" (381 cm), 109' (277 cm) 6 with Overlap 6.5" (16.5 cm), overhang 30.9" (78.4 deck and 7 raised. cm). .75%4' (1.9-10.2 cm) in .25' (.6 cm) increments. 10-gauge steel constructed chambers with 12-gauge welded reinforcements. 1.5' (3.8 cm) square x .25" (.6 cm) wall tube with 7-gauge side supports. Spindle support 3/16" (.48 cm) high-strength steel and 10-gauge exterior channels. Ductile cast iron spindle housing. Dual greaseable tapered roller bearings. 1.25" (3.2 cm) diameter solid cold finished steel spindle shaft. Spliced connection between spindle shaft and pulley. Welded blade retainer plus anti-scalp cups. 6" (15.3 cm) anti-scalp cups on each blade. On each deck: two 5" (12.7 cm) diameter front rollers, one 3° (7.6 cm) diameter rear roller. 27" (68.6 cm) long, 2.5° (6.4 cm) wide, .25" (.64 cm) thick. Standard combo blade optional Atomic Blade for leaf mulching. Groundsmaster 4700-0 has an impact absorption device on wing decks 6 and 7. ENGINE AIR CLEANER RADIATOR FUEL CAPACITY TRACTION DRIVE HYDRAULICS/COOLING DIAGNOSTICS GROUND SPEED TIRES MAIN FRAME BRAKES SEAT STEERING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS ELECTRICAL INTERLOCKS OPERATOR AREA WORK LIGHT ROPS DIMENSIONS W/ CUTTING UNITS WEIGHT FUEL ECONOMY** SAFETY WARRANTY ACCESSORIES TYPE WIDTH OF CUT HEIGHT OF CUT CONSTRUCTION SPINDLE ASSEMBLY GROUND FOLLOWING BLADES WING PROTECTION Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-1 Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane Roundabout Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for the Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane Roundabout. INTRODUCTION: See attached detailed Request for Purchase report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 March 15, 2015 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-1 Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane Roundabout March 8, 2016 May 8, 2016 Minger Construction Company, Inc. $2,114,764.82 Recommended Quote or Bid: Minger Construction Company, Inc. $2,114,764.82 Information/Background: The project involves installation of a one-lane roundabout at the intersection of Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road, and Valley Lane. These segments are classified as municipal state aid streets. This facility will provide a safer pedestrian crossing facility for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, will slow traffic along Tracy Avenue and Valley View Road, and will improve access onto Tracy Avenue and Valley View Road from Valley Lane. This project was initiated by staff based on resident and City Council comments and concerns about pedestrians crossing Tracy Avenue as they use the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Staff has worked with the residents to address concerns with impacts adjacent to the work. This project will be funded by Municipal State Aid, Three Rivers Park District, respective utility funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. This project is listed in the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP #15-151. Staff recommends awarding the project to Minger Construction Company, Inc. G:\ENG\CONST\CONTRACTS\2016\ENG 16-1 Tracy_VV_Roundabout\BA430\ADMIN\MISC\RFP Award of Bid_Roundabout.docx Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-2 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for the Golf Terrace B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. INTRODUCTION: See attached detailed Request for Purchase report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 March 15, 2015 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-2 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction March 4, 2016 May 4, 2016 Palda & Sons, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Park Construction Company Geislinger & Sons, Inc. $4,911,831.76 $5,341,201.66 $5,585,534.54 $5,895,514.05 Recommended Quote or Bid: Palda & Sons, Inc. $4,911,831.76 Information/Background: This project includes Golf Terrace, Lakeview Drive, Oak Drive, Concord Avenue, Lexington Avenue, St. Johns Avenue, West 56th Street, Tower Street, Woodland Road West, Concord Terrace, and Fairfax Avenue. The project involves rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer, localized rehabilitation of watermain systems, construction of new concrete curb and gutter and concrete sidewalks, and complete reconstruction of bituminous pavement surfaces. This project will be funded by special assessments, respective utility funds and the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. Based on the bid results, we are anticipating the special assessment to be reduced by approximately 19% to $12,815 versus the $15,783 that was discussed at the public hearing. The City utility funded costs are expected to decrease by approximately 13% over the estimates presented at the public hearing. Sidewalks will be funded by the PACS fund and are approximately double due to the addition of the West 56th Street sidewalk which was added to the project following the public hearing. The final project costs are subject to change based on construction related items such as soil corrections and turf restoration. The final special assessments will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing in 2017. This project is listed in the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP #15-135 for $5,670,719 which includes indirect engineering and finance costs whereas the quote is construction costs only. Staff recommends awarding the project to Palda & Sons, Inc. G:\ENG\CONST\CONTRACTS\2016\ENG 16-2 Golf Terr B\BA420\ADMIN\MISC\RFP Award of Bid.docx Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-6 Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane Roundabout Landscaping Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for the Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane Roundabout Landscaping. INTRODUCTION: See attached detailed Request for Purchase report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 March 15, 2015 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-6 Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane Roundabout Landscaping March 8, 2016 May 8, 2016 Hoffman & McNamara Company Cedar Ridge Landscaping, Inc. G Urban Companies, Inc. $49,634.00 $58,269.81 $87,345.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Hoffman & McNamara Company $49,634.00 Information/Background: The project involves installation of landscaping in the area of the new one-lane roundabout at the intersection of Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road, and Valley Lane. This portion of the project was bid separate from the main construction portion because it is simpler to manage a landscaping contractor and the warranty period is longer than our typical construction related items. Typical construction items have a warranty period of two years. Our landscaping projects typically have a warranty period of three years to assist in establishing the landscaping. This project will be funded by Municipal State Aid and Three Rivers Park District funds. Hoffman & McNamara Company has successfully completed other landscaping projects for the City of Edina. Staff recommends awarding the project to Hoffman & McNamara Company. G:\ENG\CONST\CONTRACTS\2016\ENG 16-6 Tracy_VV_RAB_Landscaping\A266\ADMIN\MISC\RFP Award of Bid_Landscaping.docx Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ross Bintner - Environmental Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2016-34 Support for GreenCorp Grant Application Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2016-34, a resolution of support for GreenCorp grant application. INTRODUCTION: The attached grant application requires a resolution of support from the Council. If successful, Edina would host a GreenCorp employee for approximately 11 months, starting in September 2016. This employee would be hired and paid by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and would work in coordination with the Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) fund employee on CAS, EEC, and Partners in Energy work plan items. Attached are the resolution of support and the application. ATTACHMENTS: Description GreenCorp Application GreenCorp Resolution of Support www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats p-mgc2-02 • 2/4/16 Page 1 of 6 Minnesota GreenCorps Host Site Application Program Year 2016 - 2017 Instructions: The Minnesota GreenCorps (MN GreenCorps) program is an AmeriCorps program coordinated by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Please complete the application, answer all questions, and send via email to mngreencorps.pca@state.mn.us. For more information, refer to the 2016-2017 Minnesota GreenCorps Host Site Application Guide. Applications must be submitted electronically by 5:00 p.m. Central Time on Friday, March 18, 2016. If you have any questions, please contact Cristina Villella at 651-757-2580 or email at mngreencorps.pca@state.mn.us. Letters of support/Board resolutions may be faxed to the attention of MN GreenCorps at 651-215-0246 if unable to include electronically as a scanned document. Please note, operation of the 2016-2017 program year is contingent on funding. Confirmation of funds may not be available before application deadline. Completed application checklist: All sections and questions answered. Board resolution from governing board and/or authorized representative (or expected timeline to submit it). Letters of support from any identified partners (either internal or external). For non-profit applicants: Proof of eligibility: 501(c) (3) status. I. Applicant and project information Name of legal applicant organization: City of Edina Mailing address: 4801 W 50th Street City: Edina State: MN Zip code: 55424 Main project contact: Ross Bintner Title: Environmental Engineer Phone: 952-903-5713 Fax: Email: rbintner@edinaMN.gov Website: www.edinaMN.gov What type of host site is your organization (check one): New Renewing Renewing host sites are not guaranteed selection as a 2016-2017 host site. Performance during previous years of the program will be taken into consideration. Identify any partner organization(s) which would be involved in a MN GreenCorps member’s project through this application: Contact information for authorized representative (individual responsible for signing legal agreements in your organization): Authorized representative name: Scott Neal Title: City Manager Mailing address: 4801 W 50th Street City: Edina State: MN Zip code: 55424 Phone: 952-826-0401 Fax: Email: sneal@EdinaMN.gov Please indicate your organization type: Government agency (local, regional, state, tribal, or federal) (Examples include cities, counties, tribal governments, park districts, regional planning organizations, watershed districts, etc.) School district 501(c) (3) non-profit organization (Note: you must submit proof of 501(c) (3) status with your application) Not for profit institutions of higher education How many MN GreenCorps members are you applying for? One Two Doc Type: Application www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats p-mgc2-02 • 2/4/16 Page 2 of 6 Please specify the number of members you are requesting. For each focus area you may choose only whole numbers (e.g., 1 or 2). Applicants may not request more than two members. Refer to Application Guide for position descriptions. Position type Members requested Position type Members requested Air Quality - Energy Conservation 1 Air Quality – Green Transportation Green Infrastructure – Local Foods Green Infrastructure - Stormwater Green Infrastructure – Urban Forestry Living Green Waste Prevention and Recycling II. Narrative questions Carefully review the pre-scoped position description(s) for which you are considering a MN GreenCorps member. Details of the member position descriptions can be found in the accompanying document 2016 – 2017 Minnesota GreenCorps Host Site Application Guide. For each project for which you are requesting a MN GreenCorps member (if more than one), please respond to the following questions, in the provided text boxes. Project scope and proposed member activities 1. Provide an overview of the direct service project you propose, and how the project fits with MN GreenCorps’ pre-scoped position description. Include the project goals and objectives, and specific activities that relate back to the position description. If the position for which you are applying included a “track” option, please identify which track you are selecting (e.g., air quality: energy conservation or green transportation). The Air Quality - Energy Conservation GreenCorp member will be involved in implementing an energy conservation and greenhouse gas reduction plan that is currently being formulated in partnership with Xcel Energy as part of the Partners in Energy program. Project goals include reduction of greenhouse gas though partnership and action in the four following focus areas: 1)Municipal operations and city facilities and conservation, 2)Renewable energy, 3)Leveraging partnerships, 4)Education and outreach Goals associated with these focus area are still being refined, but currently include 1)Reduce greenhouse gas associated with municipal operations by 30% by 2025. 2)Double participation rate and usage of Residential Windsource within 18 months. 3)Leverage school district service learning projects. and 4)750 homes take action toward carbon reduction though energy conservation as a result of focused residential information campaign. These goals will be finalized after the application deadline for this, but will be included in the Energy Action Plan, scheduled for Council Consideration in June. 2. Provide an estimated and realistic monthly timeline of the member’s activities. GreenCorp member will work collaboratively and at the direction of manager as described in questions 3. This list includes task that will be collaboratively undertaken by GreenCorp member and CAS manager. The tasks and timelines are approximate as the EAP is still in draft form at the time of this application. Focus Area 1) Municipal operations and city facilities and conservation, Focus Area 2) Renewable energy Focus Area 3) Leveraging partnerships Focus Area 4) Education and outreach September 2016: FA1)Update baseline GHG assessment using B3, Xcel and Centerpoint data, and ICLEI standard protocol. FA2,3 & 4) Outline information campaign and schedule resource and partners for future videos, website content, FA 3) Meet service learning coordinator and teachers involved with environmental club at Edina HS. FA 3&4) Meet Xcel Partners in Energy contact for residential and commercial conservation programs to plan and coordinate outreach and media. October 2016: FA 1, 4) Work with facilities manager to assess needs for education and outreach for energy conservation program. FA 3, 4) Produce Home Energy Squad promotional video, staff resource table at community events, FA 3) Participate and support service learning projects relating to conservation and sustainability. November 2016: FA 1) Investigate carbon intensity of purchases, review green purchasing policy. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats p-mgc2-02 • 2/4/16 Page 3 of 6 FA 2) Promote Community Solar in press release, social media. FA 3) Meet Energy and Environment Commission, scope workgroup and subcommittee support December 2016: FA 1) Participate in green team, organize and provide green purchasing policy training and reporting. FA 3,4) Staff resource table at community holiday events January 2017: FA 1) Assist facilities manager and CAS manager in specific energy conservation project management FA 3,4) Assist with projects in connection with Edina HS such as, service learning projects or environmental club. February 2017: FA 1) Report on 2016 annual GHG and 7 year trend to Energy and Environment Commission Goal 2&4) Promote renewables signups March 2017: FA 1) Participate in green team, green purchasing policy training and reporting. FA 2&4) Participate and support Energy and Environment Commission planning and earth day event April 2017: Assist facilities manager is specific energy conservation project management FA 2&4) Event promotion, presentation, tabling and follow up with HES and Renewable signups FA 1 ) Provide annual report for green purchasing policy. 3. AmeriCorps members cannot displace or replace previously employed, striking, or laid off workers. Please clarify how this position is not a staff position. The City of Edina has recently increased franchise fees to generate approximatly $250,000 per year to fund a Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) fund and plans to hire a full time employee to staff the effort. The The Air Quality - Energy Conservation GreenCorp member will assist and work collaborativly with this newly created position. Community need/involvement 1. Describe why you chose this area, including a discussion of how the proposed project will have a positive environmental impact on the community(s) that your organization serves. Please indicate if the project will serve under-represented, economically disadvantaged or rural populations. The City of Edina has aggressive goals for greenhouse gas reduction in chapter 10 of its comprehensive plan. This area has seen the majority of board and commission attention in the last three years, and is newly staffed, so the amount of work in planning and coordination of new partners will require additional assistance. While the project doesn't specifically list under- represented populations, energy use by condominium and apartments in the Southdale and Parklawn neighborhoods of Edina are large residential energy users that will be targeted in goals 2&4. 2. What opportunities do you see for broader involvement by community members, including mobilizing volunteers, with the MN GreenCorps project(s) you are applying for? Two goals of the project include outreach to the greater community. Connection to the school district service learning projects, and a public information campaign to promote efficiency, conservation and renewables will involve connections with many community members. The continuing work of volunteers on the Energy and Environment Comission, and connections to Xcel Energy conservation programs though the Partners in Energy planning team will provide a valuable network resource and experience that will benefit the City of Edina and the GreenCorp member. 3. If your member project requires support from other partners, either internally (e.g., other departments like IT, facilities maintenance, etc.) or externally (e.g., a school district), please list these partners below, and describe how the partnership will work. What actions will you take as the host organization to ensure that partners are fully engaged in the project? Provide letters of support with this application, as appropriate, to demonstrate commitment of these partner departments or organizations. Majority of connection internally will be with Facilities and Communications departments. External coordination will be formalized with Xcel Energy though a memorandum of understanding at the conclusion of the Partners in Energy planning process in June. Organizational capacity and commitment www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats p-mgc2-02 • 2/4/16 Page 4 of 6 Please respond to the following questions about your organization: 1. In one paragraph, describe your organization’s mission. Include a description of the community your organization serves, qualifications of your staff, the number of paid staff, and experience (if any) with hosting AmeriCorps members. The City of Edina provides municipal services in the areas of public safety, health and sanitation, planning and orderly land use, transportation and mobility, and parks and public spaces. These core services all depend on energy. The newly formed Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) Policy and fund will be staffed with 1 FTE, and will interrelate and coordinate with many professional staff dedicated to those core services. The GreenCorp member will report to the CAS fund manager and work with professionals including an Environmental Engineer, Facilities Manager, Communications Coordinator, and others. 2. Describe how your organization’s current efforts and activities reflect the commitment and expertise you can provide to supporting a MN GreenCorps member. Include examples as appropriate. Prompts for each focus area: • Air quality– status of data collection (e.g., B3); progress in developing non-motorized transportation plans (e.g., bicycle plans or comprehensive plans); commitment to reducing Greenhouse Gas (GHG) (e.g., ICLEI, mayor’s climate pact, etc.); current outreach efforts. • Green Infrastructure – organization’s level of support for local foods, forestry, and/or stormwater program; Tree City USA standing; inventory status (for trees or stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs); current outreach efforts related to local foods (e.g., Minnesota Grown), stormwater (e.g., Blue Thumb), and/or forestry (e.g., Arbor Day). • Living green – experience with environmental campaigns and outreach efforts; recent efforts in working with the public; budget for materials/supplies for public outreach; community assets available. • Waste prevention/recycling – current status of recycling/organics program; how your organization will measure progress in waste reduction/recycling. The City of Edina has aggressive GHG reduction goals in its comprehensive plan, has a standing commission dedicated to policy development around energy and the environment that has been active for nearly a decade. The City has signed the Mayors Climate Protection agreement and has been a partner to the Home Energy Squad and other Xcel conservation programs for over 5 years. B3 data is complete and accurate with a standing process to enter new data. The City has a transportation planner, and a dedicated source of funding for pedestrian and cyclist safety. 3. A host site supervisor must be able to provide at least 0.08 full time equivalent (FTE) per member, which equates to a minimum of 3.2 hours each week to review member activities, provide guidance, and set future goals. The supervisor should be a FTE, or close to full time, employee of the host site or a partnering organization. Please provide the contact information, and background/qualifications of the staff member(s) in your organization who will be responsible for day-to-day supervision of the MN GreenCorps member(s) from September 2016 through August 2017. Information for primary on-site supervisor: Focus area: Air Quality - Energy Conservation Supervisor name: Ross Bintner Title: Environmental Engineer Email: rbintner@edinaMN.gov Telephone: 952-903-5713 Describe the background and qualifications of the supervisor: 15 years in municipal engineering with specific focus on sustainability, clean water, energy conservation, building and facilities management, and program development. Information for primary on-site supervisor (if applying for a second member): Focus area: Supervisor name: Title: Email: Telephone: Describe the background and qualifications of the supervisor: 4. Minnesota GreenCorps is a program that offers individuals professional, educational, and civic growth, particularly in the environmental field. Potential members may not necessarily bring highly specialized skills to their position. Describe how you will support the member in terms of on-site training, professional development, staff support and expertise, etc. The September 2016 start date will be approximately 1-3 months following the hire of CAS fund full time employee. Onboarding and training for that position will provide Edina with recent experience with on-site training and professional development for the GreenCorp member. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats p-mgc2-02 • 2/4/16 Page 5 of 6 5. What financial and/or material resources will your organization make available for MN GreenCorps member(s) projects and activities, should these be needed? Minnesota GreenCorps members receive a very minimal training budget from the MPCA to utilize throughout their service. We do encourage host sites to assist with providing training opportunities or funding for their member to attend trainings, conferences, etc. throughout the service year, if possible. A variety of resources are currently used by staff and will be made available to the GreenCorp member including; CERTS and GreenStep cities conference and networking support. 6. Describe the office space (with approximate square footage) the member will occupy and the equipment and services that will be made available to allow them to carry out their work (computer, telephone, email address, etc). Approximately 10x7 cubical, telephone, computer, email address, and typical office supplies and printer. The City also owns a Nissan Leaf with a full artistic vehicle wrap with educational GHG and clean air message, available to the GreenCorp member for service-related activities. 7. Is your organization able to assist your member in securing local affordable housing? (not required) Yes No 8. Transportation requirements for member service activities: Host sites are not required to provide transportation for member service activities. Please keep in mind that some of our members may not have access to a personal vehicle, and some members may not be eligible to drive as a part of the program due to their driving record check. If you indicate that driving is required, you may limit the number of members eligible for your site. A. Is the member required to drive in order to access or complete service activities? Yes, and the host site can reimburse mileage (if use of a personal vehicle is necessary) Yes, and the host site cannot reimburse mileage No, public transit, ride shares, and/or bicycle are sufficient for any travel B. Will your organization make an organizational vehicle available to the member for service-related activities? Yes No Outcomes Review the overall program performance measures, as well as those associated with the position descriptions your organization is interested in. (See the Host Site Application Guide) 1. What are the estimated results of the member’s service activities? Attainment of the specific goals of the Energy and Conservation plan. 2. Describe how the results identified above will contribute to the overall program outputs and outcomes, as well as the specific position description. Attainment of interim targets building toward organizations Energy, Conservation and Renewable promotion goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. What methods and tools will be used to measure project effectiveness? B3, Xcel Energy Data, Project specific conservation and energy modeling, video views, website hits, total in-person contact numbers and hours. Sustainability 1. How does this project fit into your organization’s long-term goals? This project is in departmental work plans, organization work plans, the conservation and sustainability fund plan, Partners in Energy action plan, and the Comprehensive Plan. 2. How do you see this work continuing after the MN GreenCorps members complete their service? Though the work of the Conservation and Sustainability fund employee, green team, and the implementation of work plans. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats p-mgc2-02 • 2/4/16 Page 6 of 6 Current or past Host Sites only 1. Identify the program year you participated in, focus area, number of members hosted. N/A 2. Describe evidence of effectiveness of your current or past member projects, including environmental results, and how you might build on these results if awarded another member. N/A 3. Describe any improvements you plan to make in terms of project oversight, member supervision, implementation, and results. N/A Note: For current or past sites, site performance, including timeliness of in-kind and member reporting, site visit reviews, and communication with MN GreenCorps program staff may be taken into consideration. III. Board Resolution/letter(s) of support If your organization is governed by a Board, please provide a Board resolution in support of this application, indicating your organization’s commitment to host MN GreenCorps member, and willingness to enter an agreement with the MPCA should your site be selected (see example in the 2016-17 Minnesota GreenCorps Host Site Application Guide). If the Board resolution cannot be provided by the application deadline, please provide an explanation below and the date when it will be submitted: Will provide a link to official resolution with emailed application. Note: A Board resolution must be obtained before an agreement is executed, if applicable. Please also provide letters of support from other partner organizations or even internal departments that MN GreenCorps members may provide substantial service to. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-34 A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR GREENCORP APPLICATION WHEREAS, the City of Edina has applied to host an AmeriCorps member from the Minnesota GreenCorps, a program of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), for the 2016-2017 program year; and WHEREAS, if the MPCA selects the City of Edina, the organization is committed to implement the proposed project as described in the host site application, and in accordance with pre-scoped position description; and WHEREAS, the MPCA requires that the City of Edina enter into a host site agreement with the MPCA that identifies the terms, conditions, roles and responsibilities; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, hereby agrees to enter into and sign a host site agreement with the MPCA to carry out the member activities specified therein and to comply with all of the terms, conditions, and matching provisions of the host site agreement and authorizes and directs the City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its behalf. ADOPTED this 15th day of March, 2016 Attest:________________________________ ________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 15, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase - Utility Excavator, Public Works - Utility Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Purchase of Volvo EC160EL hydraulic excavator. INTRODUCTION: This action would replace Vehicle Number 70-405 (a 1998 CAT backhoe that has an equipment replacement score of 35). Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs, and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are, 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500. The higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. As mentioned, this piece of equipment has a score of 35. A tracked excavator will expand staff's ability to perform work tasks due to its ability to spin 360', navigate terrain unreachable by wheeled equipment and enhanced digging ability (reach, depth and technical control). Staff has demoed three brands of excavator. Operator consensus is that the Volvo best suits our needs in terms of cost, maneuverability and power. This cost represents a $23,000 trade value on the replaced vehicle. The quotes are below: Volvo $168,720.00 John Deere $182,545.43 Catepillar $184,385.00 Total cost: $168,720.00. On State Contract No. and under budget. ATTACHMENTS: Description Scoring Methodology Volvo Excavator Quote Probably the most difficult issue facing a city fleet is deciding the best time to replace equipment. If you replace the fleet too soon, you lose useful life and deplete capital funds. Waiting too long puts a financial burden on the operations and maintenance budget. . When a vehicle is within two (2) years or 10,000 miles of replacement, it becomes eligible for replacement scoring. If the vehicle/equipment scores below the criteria number, it is evaluated on an annual basis until replaced. *Scoring Model The scoring is totaled using scores on the following six performance and cost variables: • Age: One point for each twelve months of service-life. • Usage: Odometer-based vehicles=one point for each 10,000 miles Hour meter-based small equipment=one point for each 325 hours Hour meter-based large trucks/equipment=one point for each 750 hours • Type of Service: 1 to 5 points based on severity of service, i.e., one (1) for an administrative care, five (5) for a triple-shifted police patrol car or sewer jetter. • Reliability: Calculated as the ratio of the number of “normal” repair occurrences over the last twelve months (LTM) of service divided by the number of “normal” repair occurrences in the vehicle’s second twelve months (STM) of life. For example, if the LTM is 6 and the STM is 2, the Reliability Score would be 3 (6/2). “Normal occurrences” exclude planned maintenance (PMs) and all “non-normal” repairs, i.e., accidents, flats, Acts of God, driver related, warranty, etc. • Condition: The score is scaled from 1 to 5 based on an inspection of the body, underbody and structural members, rust, interior condition, a review of accident and repair history, any operational problems and anticipated major repairs within the next budget year. A score of 5 would be in very poor condition with high expectations for major future expenses. • Repair Costs: 1 to 5 points are assigned based on total life-to-date (LTD) repair costs (excluding “non- normal” repairs) and the original purchase price of the vehicle. A 5 is scored for a vehicle whose LTD repair costs exceed the original purchase price. A score of 1 is given to a vehicle whose LTD repair costs are 20% or less of the original purchase price; a 2 for 40%, 3 for 60% and 4 for 80%. Replacement qualification scores are, 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500 Nuss Truck & Equipment 12540 Dupont Avenue South Burnsville, MN 55337 952-894-9595 / 800-552-1189 Fax 952-894-1619 www.nussgrp.com TRUCK & EQUIPMENT M HUSS City of Edina Attn; Gunnar Kaasa 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 February 24, 2016 Dear Gunnar Thank you for your interest in Volvo Construction equipment. We at Nuss Truck & Equipment are pleased to provide the following quotation. 1.1 Volvo EC160EL hydraulic excavator • Operating weight; 39,910 lbs • Engine; Volvo D6J 146HP • Tier 4 final • Number of speeds 2 • Drawbar pull, lbs. 34,180 • Shoe width, 24in • Ground pressure, PSI; 4.6 PSI • Ground clearance; 1' 6" • Overall width of excavator; 8'6" • Main pumps total flow, 80GPM • Swing speed, 12.5 RPM • Boom length; 17' 1" • Arm length; 8'6" • Max dig depth; 19' 10" • Reach at ground line, 28' 0" • Dump height; 20'10" • Does not include bucket • Warranty; 1 year full machine Price .$128,495.00 2.0 operator environment options 2.1 air suspension seat .included 2.2 air conditioning .included 2.5 pilot control patter changer $935.00 2.7 AM/FM radio w/CD & MP3 player included ROCHESTER • ST. PAUL • MANKATO • ST. CLOUD • DULUTH • EAU CLAIRE • BURNSVILLE 3.0 Excavator exterior and powertrain options 3.2 engine block heater $225.00 3.3 extra work lights $250.00 3.4 Rotating beacon $150.00 3.7 rear view camera ..included 4.0 undercarriage options 4.1 28" track pads $1,275.00 5.0 hydraulics options 5.1 hydraulic quick coupler $2,315.00 5.2 Quick coupler piping .$875.00 5.3 hammer/shear 2 pump flow double acting $2,950.00 5.4 slope rotation aux. hydraulic w/piping $1,835.00 5.5 pre-setting for hyd pressure $1,275.00 6.0 boom and arm options 6.2 9'10" arm $495.00 7.0 bucket/couplers/ tool options 7.2 Sand bucket-1.25 yd .$5,500.00 Options as per City of Edina specification Rotobec clam bucket model RPA 3045B with RGP-902 Rotator installed on EC160E Volvo $38,200.00 14.0 delivery charges Minimum charge $500.00 Total machine price with options $185,275.00 Less trade of Caterpillar 446B S/N 5BL1510 ...($23,000.00) Trade price .$162,275.00 Add for dozer blade $6,445.00 If you have any questions please call me at 612.850.8722. It' 7 7 0 ' Sincerely Dan McEwen Regional Sales Manager Nuss Truck & Equipment .‘LialtiRs4,-- Q.; ef,ort.E:R yz-s Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase - Volvo L9OH Wheel Loader, Public Works - Streets CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Purchase of a Volvo L9OH Wheel Loader to replace 25-471, 2001 Case 721c loader INTRODUCTION: This is a replacement for vehicle 25-471, a 2001 Case 721c loader with 3978 hours miles on it. Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs, and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are, 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500. The higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. This piece of equipment has a score of 30. This total price includes a $32,000 trade value for the replaced vehicle. Nuss Truck and Equipment $176,409.00 State contract number 90750. ATTACHMENTS: Description Scoring methodology Quote under State Contract Probably the most difficult issue facing a city fleet is deciding the best time to replace equipment. If you replace the fleet too soon, you lose useful life and deplete capital funds. Waiting too long puts a financial burden on the operations and maintenance budget. . When a vehicle is within two (2) years or 10,000 miles of replacement, it becomes eligible for replacement scoring. If the vehicle/equipment scores below the criteria number, it is evaluated on an annual basis until replaced. *Scoring Model The scoring is totaled using scores on the following six performance and cost variables: • Age: One point for each twelve months of service-life. • Usage: Odometer-based vehicles=one point for each 10,000 miles Hour meter-based small equipment=one point for each 325 hours Hour meter-based large trucks/equipment=one point for each 750 hours • Type of Service: 1 to 5 points based on severity of service, i.e., one (1) for an administrative care, five (5) for a triple-shifted police patrol car or sewer jetter. • Reliability: Calculated as the ratio of the number of “normal” repair occurrences over the last twelve months (LTM) of service divided by the number of “normal” repair occurrences in the vehicle’s second twelve months (STM) of life. For example, if the LTM is 6 and the STM is 2, the Reliability Score would be 3 (6/2). “Normal occurrences” exclude planned maintenance (PMs) and all “non-normal” repairs, i.e., accidents, flats, Acts of God, driver related, warranty, etc. • Condition: The score is scaled from 1 to 5 based on an inspection of the body, underbody and structural members, rust, interior condition, a review of accident and repair history, any operational problems and anticipated major repairs within the next budget year. A score of 5 would be in very poor condition with high expectations for major future expenses. • Repair Costs: 1 to 5 points are assigned based on total life-to-date (LTD) repair costs (excluding “non- normal” repairs) and the original purchase price of the vehicle. A 5 is scored for a vehicle whose LTD repair costs exceed the original purchase price. A score of 1 is given to a vehicle whose LTD repair costs are 20% or less of the original purchase price; a 2 for 40%, 3 for 60% and 4 for 80%. Replacement qualification scores are, 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500 City of Edina December 3, 2015 Attn; Gunnar Kaasa 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Gunnar Thank you for your continued interest in Volvo loaders. This machine is priced from state contract number 90750. 1.1 Volvo L9OH articulated wheel loader • Engine; Volvo model D6J, 184 HP diesel, tier 4 final • Rear sunscreen • Rear vision camera • Heated mirrors • Engine block heater • Reversible cooling fan • Care Track, monitoring system, with 3 year subscription • Ecology axle drain • Operating weight; 33,670 lbs • Break out force; (SAE) 30,960 lbs. • Hinge pin height; 13'4" • Articulation angle ---or-40 degrees • Transmission type; automatic power shift, with automatic function • Differential type; 100% locking front, conventional rear • Battery; 690 CCA • Load sensing hydraulics • Lifetime frame warranty Price of base machine $141,274.00 2.0 operator station 2.1 air conditioning $3,200.00 2.2 air suspension seat .std 2.3 AM/FM radio with blue tooth/ USB/AUX $485.00 2.4 left hand arm rest $125.00 2.5 boom suspension $3,300.00 3.0 engine/power train 3.2 Limited slip differential $2,475.00 4.0 electric related equipment 4.1 rotating beacon collapsible $295.00 4.2 extra work lights-front (2) $315.00 4.3 extra work lights rear (2) .$300.00 4.6 heavy duty high capacity alternator standard 4.7 converter 24-12 volt (20amp) .$555.00 5.0 tires and rims * Michelins tires, 20.5R25 XSNO+L2 snow 6.0 hydraulics $2,200.00 6.5 third and fourth hydraulic function $2,910.00 6.6 American coupler quick attach $6,225.00 6.7 single lever control including third hyd. Function $2,995.00 7.0 bucket/attachments 7.8 3.5 yd. American Coupler bucket with edge $9,900.00 8.0 other loader option 8.1 Falls snow wing Model LDL (10') wing $13,975.00 8.2 Falls 2 SGL joystick control $6,475.00 8.3 Falls plow front mounted reversible model PR12 (12') $9,685.00 8.4 full fenders .$795.00 8.5 mud flaps, for full fenders .$475.00 10.0 delivery 10.0 delivery to the city of Edina $450.00 One set of service, operators and parts manuals included * as per City of Edina specifications Total machine and options $208,409.00 Less trade of Case 721C S/N JEE0125692 ($32,000.00) Trade price $176,409.00 If you have any questions on this quotation please call me at 612.850.8722. Sincerely Dan McEwen Nuss Truck and Equipment Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase - 2016 TORO 3500 Lawn Mower, Public Works - Park Maintenance Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: This is for the replacement of vehicle 47-648, a 2005 Toro Ground master mower that is in use at Courtney Fields. INTRODUCTION: Our equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs, and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are, 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500. The higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a light duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 23. This piece of equipment is considered a light duty vehicle and has a score of 27. This mower is in use at Courtney Fields, which is known to be some of the best baseball fields in the State of Minnesota. Our recommendation is to replace this mower to avoid a breakdown of this vital piece of equipment. The replaced mower will be sold to highest bidder at auction. The trade in value will be sent back to the equipment replacement fund when it is sold. MTI Distributing, $30,753.71 National IPA pricing, Edina IPA member number 2290351 ATTACHMENTS: Description mower quote MTI Distributing Equipment Proposal December 9, 2015 City of Edina IPA Member #2290351 0/STP101.1TING FLUdIAL#111481111.6614161landal Gunnar Kaasa City of Edina Parks Department Expiration Date 1/8/2016 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 NATIONAL IPA PRICING Qty Model Number Description Price Price Extension 1 30807 Groundsmaster 3500-D (25hp Diesel Powered) $30,753.71 $30,753.71 TOTALS Equipment Total $30,753.71 Toro Protection Plus $0.00 Trade Ins $0.00 Estimated Sales/Use Tax $0.00 Total $30,753.71 Quote is valid for 30 days New Toro commercial equipment comes with a two-year manufacturer warranty Equipment delivery at no additional charge Thank you for the opportunity to submit this quote. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting us. Larry Gorman, SCPS Karen Wangensteen Outside Sales Representative Inside Sales Representative 612-877-0830 763-592-5643 MTI Distributing, Inc. • 4830 Azelia Avenue N. #100 • Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of February 3, 2016 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Report of February 3, 2016. INTRODUCTION: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the February 3, 2016 Traffic Safety Report at their February 18 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of February 3, 2016 Draft ETC Minutes for Feb 18, 2016 March 17, 2016 Mayor and City Council Joe Totten, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of February 03, 2016 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on February 03. The City Engineer, Assistant City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, Transportation Planner and Police Lieutenant were in attendance for this meeting. For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included on the February 18 Edina Transportation Commission and the March 15 City Council meeting agendas. Section A : Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Request for treatment(s) to increase westbound compliance with all-way stop control at 42nd Street and Alden Drive, with a preference for stop bars This request comes from neighbors in the Morningside neighborhood, and was relayed to staff via an Edina Transportation Commissioner. The request notes that vehicles on 42nd Street do not stop for the stop signs at Alden Drive often, and this creates a dangerous situation. The T-intersection is an all way stop, with 42nd Street being identified as a local connector in the comprehensive plan, and Alden Drive is identified as a local street. A video analysis, from 5:00 AM-10:00 PM, of westbound vehicle traffic identified 123 drivers as not reaching a full stop, 4 drivers ran the stop sign at what was clearly a very high and dangerous rate of speed; these numbers are out of 770 westbound drivers who passed the intersection in the timeframe studied. No reported crashes have occurred in the past ten years at this location. Map : 42nd Street and Alden Drive Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 03, 2016 Page 2 Map : Eden Avenue at Our Lady of Grace parking entrance Photo : Screenshot from video analysis, looking south from Eden Avenue, towards Our Lady of Grace parking entrance After review, staff recommends using this intersection to study the effect of using red posts with stop signs to give the sign greater weight. Video will be collected of the intersection to best observe westbound traffic; before and after the stop sign’s post has a red reflective strip added to it. This study will be completed within the year, and this item will be reconsidered at that time. The recommendation to not install a stop bar at this location is due to a lack of research on their effectiveness, while the red reflective strips can be installed immediately, and are easier to remove if found ineffective, and have been installed in other locations around the city. Section B : Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Request for mitigating difficult left turns from Our Lady of Grace parking access onto westbound Eden Avenue This request comes from a parent who drops their child off at Our Lady of Grace school daily; the requestor states that turning left out of the parking lot onto Eden Avenue is difficult during school drop- off, and turning right, then using Arcadia and Gus Young to avoid this issue is troublesome because of the backups from the Grandview area Starbucks Drive-Thru. To avoid bus and pedestrian conflicts, Our Lady of Grace only allows for utilization of the school’s northern access for parent drop-off. Buses are shared between Our Lady of Grace and Normandale Elementary; this consideration prevents use of other entrances being utilized for the school’s drop-off. A video study was performed, both determining the vehicle gaps on Eden Avenue of sufficient size for left turns out of the parking lot, as well as a delay study for left turning vehicles. The delay study only concerned left turning vehicles as it was seen that the queue for left turns rarely, if ever interferes with right turns out of the driveway. The video study found that most left hand turns occurred during school drop-off from 7:45-8:30 AM. The gap analysis study determined that the least number of gaps occurred between 8:15-8:30 AM. During this time there were 18 gaps that allowed left hand turns. In the delay study from 7:45-8:30 AM the average delay was about 19 seconds. The maximum delay was found to be 22 seconds and occurred between 8:15-8:30 AM. After review, staff does not recommend immediate treatments of the issues presented by the requestor, due to sufficient gaps and a delay which would be considered a Level Of Service of C by the Highway Capacity Manual. The number of gaps also did not present itself as an issue, with several gaps of proper length for left turns (by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials “Green Book”). Further, as the Grandview District Photo : 42nd Street at Alden Avenue, the approach studied is on the far side of the intersection Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 03, 2016 Page 3 Transportation Study is completed, and the Former Public Works site is redeveloped, strategies and recommendations will be presented, regarding traffic in the area. B2. Request for stop control at the intersection of Ridge Place and Dale Drive to increase safety at an intersection with inadequate sight distance This request comes from the Sunnyslope neighborhood, where a resident is concerned about sight distances at the intersection of Dale Drive and Ridge Place. The requestor noted how neighbors do not drive on the sides of the streets, but down the middle, and is concerned for neighborhood children who are biking in the streets. This is a three-leg intersection, and the main concern from the requestor is that southbound traffic on Ridge Place cannot see westbound traffic on Dale Drive and vice- versa, as they approach the uncontrolled intersection. Both of these streets have counts from 2014 studies in the neighborhood, Both streets have 85th- percentile speeds which are around 20 mph, Ridge Place has a volume of 273 ADT and Dale Drive’s east of this intersection has a volume of 121 ADT. This would indicate that should a sightline issue be investigated, required sight distances from AASHTO should be considered at speeds of 20, 25, and 30 mph. The low volumes indicate that although no crashes are seen in this location, the likelihood of these two approaches having an approaching vehicle in the same few seconds, is so unlikely that even if a safety issue does exist it is unlikely to have presented itself through a crash history. No crashes have been reported in this location in the last five years. Sight distances were investigated, with different design speeds for 20, 25 and 30 mph design speeds, as indicated above. The tables below show if an approach has a given 85th-percentile or design speed, if it would have sufficient sight distance with the possible 85th-percentile or design speeds of the opposing approach. Dale Drive Ri d g e P l a c e Uncontrolled Intersection 20 mph design speed, 90 feet 25 mph design speed, 115 feet 30 mph design speed, 140 feet 20 mph design speed, 90 feet Yes Yes No 25 mph design speed, 115 feet Yes Yes No 30 mph design speed, 140 feet No No No Left Turn from Stop Dale Drive, 20 mph design speed, 220 feet Dale Drive, 25 mph design speed, 280 feet Dale Drive, 30 mph design speed, 335 feet Ridge Place, 18 feet from intersection Yes Yes No Map : Ridge Place and Dale Drive, approximate centerlines are shown in red for greater clarity Photo : Berm on the Northern corner of the intersection Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 03, 2016 Page 4 Map : Woodhill Way and Ridge Place The southwest leg of Dale Drive was seen to have adequate sight distance for all movements, as did right turns. A peak-hour radar study found an 85th-percentile speed of 27 mph on Dale Drive as it enters the neighborhood. Five of the 74 drivers surveyed entered the intersection while traveling more than 25 mph, and all of these drivers were entering the neighborhood on Dale Drive, on the leg determined to have adequate sight distance under all conditions. After review, staff has recommended this request for no action. This is because sight distance measurements are taken at approximately 3.5-feet of height. This is a residential neighborhood, and the low speeds found with most drivers were seen as an indication that almost all drivers in this neighborhood are maintaining a speed which would be reasonable under these conditions. Additionally, installing a stop sign would not solve all sight distance issues. B3. Request for stop control at the intersection of Ridge Place and Woodhill Way This request was previously considered in 2014, the requestor in this case wishes for stop signs to increase intersection safety specifically for children riding bicycles in the street, based highly on sight distance concerns. Sightlines were seen to be sufficient in 2014, and Ridge Place was seen as the major street, with an ADT of 273 vehicles and an 85th Percentile speed of 20.0 mph. No further sight line issues were observed due to the change in seasons. Further, other area residents voiced strong opposition to controlling the intersection during site visits in 2014, due to increased noise, speeds away from the stop sign, aesthetics, and non-compliance with stop signs in residential neighborhoods. No crashes have been reported in this location in the past ten years. After review, staff continued their recommendation from 2014 of no action. The area was shown to have sufficient sight distances in the summer of 2014, and the investigation during the winter of 2016 did not find any issues with sight distance either. Existing low speeds were also considered during the decision on this request. Section D : Other items handled by traffic safety D1. A resident called in to request a street name blade for wayfinding. Summit Avenue, the street name requested, is a private road. This sign was placed, with the signage placed for Vernon Lane (2014) used as precedent for giving street name signs to private roads where they intersect public roads. D2. A requestor asked that the Grandview Starbucks not be allowed to use Arcadia Avenue as a queuing space for the drive-thru, as this was blocking traffic and causing safety issues when the requestor’s spouse and mother-in-law are dropped off at various Grandview area locations. This item has been addressed in previous traffic safety reports (2004, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015). D3. A driver was very concerned with the possible design of speed bumps and if Edina would be able to inspect and alter speed bumps in a condo development’s parking lot, as the driver’s small SUV was bottoming out on the bumps. Because this was on private property, typical designs of speed bumps were Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 03, 2016 Page 5 provided, but no investigation was handled. The requestor was advised to report the issue to the homeowners association. D4. A requestor notes that traffic on Vernon Avenue is driving above the speed limit during mid-afternoon and into the evening. This request was forwarded to the police department, and a separate radar study was taken from 3:00-4:30. This data was forwarded to the police department and Hennepin County. D5. A requestor on 49th Street noted high vehicle speeds on that street. This request and existing traffic data on the street were forwarded to the police department for directed enforcement. D6. A requestor noted that construction vehicles for 6500 France Avenue were staged too close to an existing building’s driveway. After discussing parking laws, the requestor wished for investigation to determine if the staging was illegal. In a site visit, the staging was legal, and no conflict was observed. D7. A requestor asked for instructions on how to reach the new Lund’s and Byerly’s store, as the new median on Hazelton Road prevents a left turn directly into the parking lot. A site visit determined that the signs which the requestor believed banned the movement around the roundabout to the south instead were instructing drivers on how to enter the grocer’s parking lot. These instructions were relayed to the requestor. D8. A requestor noted a dangerous situation which has happened when the requestor stopped while blocking a roundabout on 70th Street, as other drivers passed the requestor slowly and cautiously on the truck apron. How to drive in a roundabout was discussed, as the requestor acknowledged he did not know the rules in these types of intersections. And the dangerous situation he described was walked through to ensure that the requestor knew how to prevent a repeat of the situation. D9. A requestor asked for vehicle and non-motorized counts on Cornelia Drive, between 70th Street and 66th Street. These were provided. Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 03, 2016 Page 6 Appendix A: Stop Sign Warrants When it is determined that a full stop is always required on an approach to an intersection a STOP (R1-1) sign shall be used. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs. The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction with the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users from the minor street failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. Additional warrants which do not specify the type of control are as follows; A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C. An un-signalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more the 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Additional warrants from the city of Edina list that: 1. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 2. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. 3. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. 4. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 5. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 6. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 1 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Council Chambers February 18, 6:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Bass called the meeting to order. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Iyer, LaForce, Loeffelholz, Janovy, Nelson, and Olson. Absent at roll call were members Ding, Ruehl and Spanhake. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Iyer approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Boettge approving the edited Jan. 21, 2016 minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. A. Traffic Safety Report of Feb. 3, 2016 D.2. When does queuing in the street become an issue for the Planning Commission for enforcement? Or, is this a police issue? Commissioners recall having a conversation with the police and they did not believe enforcement was necessary. Planner Nolan said staff talked with Starbucks management and they were not willing to look at making changes. Member Janovy suggested creating an avenue for referring issues like these to the Planning Commission. Motion was made by chair Bass and seconded by member LaForce to forward the Feb. 3, 2016, Traffic Safety Report to City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution 2016-37 Approving Hennepin County Funds for 3330 West 66th Street Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution. INTRODUCTION: The Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority has awarded $500,000 to support the construction of affordably-priced housing at 3330 West 66th Street in Edina. The project consists of 39 units of housing for teenagers and young adults who were formerly homeless. City consent is requested prior to the final loan commitments. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res 2016-37 HC HRA for 66 West RESOLUTION NO. 2016-37 APPROVING USE OF HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FUNDS FOR 3330 WEST 66TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Whereas, Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (the “Developer”) intends to construct the 66 West Apartments located at 3330 West 66th Street, Edina, Minnesota consisting of 39 efficiency apartment units targeted as affordably-priced housing for teenagers and young adults who were formerly homeless; and Whereas, the Developer has acquired the site, secured final site plan approvals and commitments to fully fund the project; and Whereas, the development of new affordable housing frequently involves financial support from a number of different sources; and Whereas, the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HCHRA) in Resolution No. 15-HCHRA-0012 has approved the use of a $200,000 Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF) loan and in Resolution No. 14-HCHRA-0018 has also approved the use of a $300,000 Transit Oriented Development (TOD) loan for the 66 West Apartment project contingent upon the City of Edina’s consent to the HCHRA’s participation in the project; and Whereas, the 66 West Apartment project will increase the supply of affordable housing in the City of Edina by providing 39 new units of housing; and Whereas, the AHIF and TOD loans from the HCHRA are necessary to complete the financing required for the 66 West Apartment project to go forward. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved, that the participation of the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority in the 66 West Apartment project is hereby approved. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 15th day of March, 2016. Attest: ___________________________ _____________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of March 15, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2016. _______________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.N. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kay McAloney, Director of Human Resources Item Activity: Subject:2016-2017 Union Contract for Teamsters Local 320 - Police Officers Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion approving the 2016-2017 Union Contract for Teamsters Local 320 - Police Officers. INTRODUCTION: The Teamsters Local 320 have voted to accept the proposed contract. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Local 320 Contract 2016-2017 Local 320 Police Bold and Strike Out Contract March 15, 2016 MAYOR AND COUNCIL Kay E. McAloney, Human Resources Director Approval of Union Contract for Teamsters Local 320 – Police Officers Information / Background: The tentative agreement for this bargaining unit includes the following substantive changes from the previous contract: • A two-year agreement (2016 – 2017) • A 2.5% increase effective 1-1-2016, a 3.0% increase 1-1-2017. • Language changes to clarify existing practices. Attachment: • Bold and Strike Out Proposed 2016-2017 Labor Agreement between City of Edina and Local 320 – Police Officers Action Requested: Staff recommends approval of 2016-2017 Union Contract for Teamsters Local 320: Police Officers LABOR AGREEMENT between CITY OF EDINA and MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. Representing: Police Officers January ., ./0 to December ., .23 INDEX ARTICLE PAGE I PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT .................................................................... 1 II RECOGNITION ......................................................................................... 1 III DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................ 1 IV EMPLOYER SECURITY ............................................................................ 2 V EMPLOYER AUTHORITY ......................................................................... 2 VI UNION SECURITY .................................................................................... 2 VII EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE................................. 3 VIII SAVINGS CLAUSE ................................................................................... 5 IX SENIORITY ............................................................................................... 6 X DISCIPLINE ............................................................................................... 6 XI CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION ........................................................... 7 XII WORK SCHEDULES ................................................................................. 7 XIII OVERTIME ................................................................................................ 7 XIV COURT TIME/STANDBY ........................................................................... 8 XV CALL BACK TIME ..................................................................................... 8 XVI WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION .................................................... 8 XVII INSURANCE .............................................................................................. 9 XVIII UNIFORMS ................................................................................................ 9 XIX INJURY ON DUTY ..................................................................................... 9 XX LONGEVITY .............................................................................................. 9 XXI VACATION ................................................................................................ 9 XXII SEVERANCE PAY .................................................................................. 10 XXIII SICK LEAVE WITH PAY .......................................................................... 10 XXIV HOLIDAYS ............................................................................................... 11 XXV EMPLOYEE FITNESS INCENTIVE ......................................................... 11 XXVI P.O.S.T. BOARD LICENSURE ................................................................ 11 XXVII WAIVER ................................................................................................... 12 XXVIII DURATION .............................................................................................. 12 APPENDIX A ........................................................................................... 13 APPENDIX B ........................................................................................... 14 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING .............................................. 15 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING .............................................. 16 i 1 ARTICLE I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into as of January 1, 2014 2016 between the City of Edina, hereinafter called the Employer, and the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 320, hereinafter called the Union. It is the intent and purpose of this Agreement to: 1.1 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this Agreement’s interpretation and/or application; and 1.2 Place in written form the parties' agreement upon terms and conditions of employment for the duration of this agreement. ARTICLE II. RECOGNITION 2.1 The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179A.03 Subdivision 14, for all police personnel in the following job classifications: Patrol Officer Detective 2.2 In the event the Employer and the Union are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation Services for determination. ARTICLE III. DEFINITIONS 3.1 UNION: The Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 320. 3.2 UNION MEMBER: A member of the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 320. 3.3 EMPLOYEE: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 3.4 DEPARTMENT: The Edina Police Department 3.5 EMPLOYER: The City of Edina 3.6 CHIEF: The Chief of the Edina Police Department 3.7 DETECTIVE: An employee specifically assigned by the Employer to the job classification and/or job position of Detective. 3.8 OVERTIME: Work performed at the express authorization of the Employer in excess of the employee's scheduled shift. 2 3.9 SCHEDULED SHIFT: A consecutive work period including rest breaks and a lunch break. 3.10 REST BREAKS: Periods during the Scheduled Shift during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.11 LUNCH BREAK: A period during the Scheduled Shift during which the employee remains on continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.12 STRIKE: Concerted action in failing to report to duty, the willful absence from one's position, the stoppage of work, slow-down, or abstinence in whole or in part from the full, faithful and proper performance of the duties of employment for the purposes of inducing, influencing or coercing a change in the conditions or compensation or the rights, privileges or obligations of employment. ARTICLE IV. EMPLOYER SECURITY The Union agrees that during the life of this Agreement that the Union will not cause, encourage, participate in or support any strike, slow-down, or other interruption of or interference with the normal function of the Employer. ARTICLE V. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY 5.1 The Employer retains full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower staffing, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs, to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct, and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules, and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this Agreement. 5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the Employer to modify, establish or eliminate. ARTICLE VI. UNION SECURITY 6.1 The Employer shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize such a deduction in writing an amount necessary to cover monthly Union dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the Union. 6.2 The Union may designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as a steward and an alternate and shall inform the Employer in writing of such choice and changes in the position of steward and/or alternate. 6.3 The Employer shall make space available on the employee bulletin board for posting Union notice(s) and announcement(s). 3 6.4 The Union agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgment brought or issued against the Employer as a result of any action taken or not taken by the Employer under the provision of this article. ARTICLE VII. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 7.1 DEFINITION OF GRIEVANCE A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement. 7.2 UNION REPRESENTATIVE The Employer will recognize Representatives designated by the Union as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The Union shall notify the Employer in writing of the names of such Union Representatives and their successors when so designated as provided by 6.2 of this Agreement. 7.3 PROCESS OF A GRIEVANCE It is recognized and accepted by the Union and the Employer that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the Employees and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved Employee and a Union Representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the Employer during normal working hours provided that the Employee and the Union Representative have notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the Employer. 7.4 PROCEDURE Grievances, as defined by Section 7.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Step 1. An Employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the Employee’s supervisor as designated by the Employer. The Employer-designated representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1 grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the Agreement allegedly violated, the remedy requested, and shall be appealed in writing to Step 2 within 4 ten (10) calendar days after the Employer-designated representative's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed to Step 2 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and discussed with the Employer-designated Step 2 representative. The Employer-designated representative shall give the Union the Employer’s Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer-designated representative's final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and discussed with the Employer-designated Step 3 representative. The Employer- designated representative shall give the Union the Employer’s answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer-designated representative's final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3-A. If the grievance is not resolved at Step 3 of the grievance procedure, the parties, by mutual agreement, may submit the matter to mediation with the Bureau of Mediation Services. Submitting the grievance to mediation preserves timelines for Step 3 of the grievance procedure. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 by the Union shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the Public Employment Relations Board. 7.5 ARBITRATOR'S AUTHORITY A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the Employer and the Union, and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without the power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the Employer and the Union and shall be based solely on the 5 arbitrator’s interpretation or application of the express terms of this Agreement and to the facts of the grievance presented. C. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the Employer and the Union provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representative and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally. 7.6 WAIVER If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered "waived". If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the Employer’1/s last answer. If the Employer does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the Union may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal he grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the Employer and the Union in each step. 7.7 CHOICE OF REMEDY If, as a result of the written Employer response in Step 3, the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period, the grievance may be appealed either to Step 4 of Article VII or a procedure such as: Civil Service, Veteran's Preference, or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 4 of Article VII, the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 Article VII. The aggrieved employee shall indicate in writing which procedure is to be utilized -- Step 4 of Article VII or another appeal procedure -- and shall sign a statement of the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved employee from making a subsequent appeal through Step 4 of Article VII. ARTICLE VIII. SAVINGS CLAUSE This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota and the City of Edina. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provisions may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. 6 ARTICLE IX. SENIORITY 9.1 Seniority shall be determined by the employee's length of continuous employment with the Police Department and posted in an appropriate location. Seniority rosters may be maintained by the Chief on the basis of time in grade and time within specific classifications. 9.2 During the probationary period a newly hired or rehired employee may be discharged at the sole discretion of the Employer. During the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee may be replaced in his previous position at the sole discretion of the Employer. 9.3 A reduction of work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. Employees shall be recalled on the basis of seniority. An employee on layoff shall have an opportunity to return to work within two (2) years of the time of his the layoff before any new employee is hired. 9.4 Senior employees will be given preference with regard to transfer, job classification assignments and promotions when the job-relevant qualifications of employees are equal. 9.5 Senior qualified employees shall be given shift assignment preference after eighteen (18) months of continuous full-time employment. 9.6 One continuous vacation period shall be selected on the basis of seniority until March 15th of each calendar year. ARTICLE X. DISCIPLINE 10.1 The Employer will discipline for just cause only. Discipline will be in one or more of the following forms: a) oral reprimand; b) written reprimand; c) demotion; d) suspension with or without pay; or e) discharge 10.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be in written form. 10.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension, and notices of discharge which are to become part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledged by signature of the employee. Employees and the Union will receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices. 10.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under the direct supervision of the Employer. 7 10.5 Discharges will be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. 10.6 Employees will not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity to have a Union representative present at such questioning. 10.7 Grievances relating to this Article shall be initiated by the Union in Step 3 of the grievance procedure under Article VII. ARTICLE XI. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION Employees shall have the rights granted to all citizens by the United States and Minnesota State Constitutions. ARTICLE XII WORK SCHEDULES 12.1 The normal work year is two thousand and eighty hours (2,080) to be accounted for by each employee through: a) hours worked on assigned shifts; b) holidays; c) assigned training; d) authorized leave time 12.2 Nothing contained in this or any other Article shall be interpreted to be a guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours the Employer may assign employees. ARTICLE XIII. OVERTIME 13.1 Employees will be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate for hours worked in excess of the employee's regularly scheduled shift. Changes of shifts do not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article. 13.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally by seniority, as practicable. 13.3 Overtime refused by employees will, for record purposed under Article 13.2, be considered as unpaid overtime worked. 13.3 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded or paid twice for the same hours worked. 13.4 Overtime will be calculated to the nearest fifteen (15) minutes. 13.5 Employees have the obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested by the Employer unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee from so working. 13.6 Those employees who are scheduled and work on New Year's Day, President's 8 Day, Easter, Memorial Day, 4th of July, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, the day after Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, 1/2 day on Christmas Eve, and 1/2 day on New Year's Eve, shall receive one and one-half (1 1/2) times their regular rate of pay for the time worked. ARTICLE XIV. COURT TIME/STANDBY 14.1 An employee who is required to appear in court during their scheduled off duty time shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's base pay rate. If the court appearance is during the employee's off duty time and the court appearance is canceled, the employee will be given a forty-eight (48) hour notice of cancellation. If notification of cancellation is not given in the forty-eight (48) hour time frame, the employee will receive two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's regular pay rate. An extension early report to a regularly-scheduled shift for court appearance does not qualify the employee for the two (2) hour minimum. 14.2 Proper notification of court cancellation will consist of a court cancellation notice being placed in the officer's mail slot. The notice will be stamped with the date and time it is placed in the officer's mail slot, thereby constituting proper notification if prior to forty-eight (48) hours of the court assignment time. It will be the officer's responsibility to ascertain if he/she has received a cancellation notice. 14.3 An employee who is required to appear in court during his/her scheduled off-duty time on the same day as that on which he/she completes a 1800 - 0600 shift shall be paid at the rate of two (2) times the employee's base pay rate. This shall apply only to employees working the 1800 - 0600 shift as part of the regularly assigned schedule. 14.4 Employees required by the Employer to standby shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee’s base pay rate. Employee’s required by the Employer to standby during his/her off-duty time on the same day as that on which he/she completes a 1800- 0600 shift shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at the rate of two (2) times the employee’s base pay rate. After the two (2) hour minimum has been reached, employees shall be paid at the rate of one (1) hour pay for each additional hour on standby. Proper notification of court cancellation for standby shall be specified in Article 14.2. ARTICLE XV. CALL BACK TIME An employee who is called to duty during his/her scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours pay at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's base pay rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for duty does not qualify the employee for the three (3) hour minimum. ARTICLE XVI. WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION 9 Employees assigned by the Employer to serve as an “Acting Supervisor” will receive an additional $8.00 per hour. ARTICLE XVII. INSURANCE The bargaining unit will receive an employer contribution equivalent to that amount approved for all other employees. The Employer agrees to provide a $70,000.00 accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy, the cost of which is to be shared in the following manner: Employee shall pay $10.00 per year; the Employer shall pay the remaining cost of the premium. ARTICLE XVIII. UNIFORMS Uniform items in current use will be replaced as needed. Uniform items are those currently purchased by the Employer and excludes personal gear. Authorizations for additional new equipment rests exclusively with the Employer. ARTICLE XIX. INJURY ON DUTY Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the Employer and thereby rendered unable to work for the Employer will be paid the difference between the employee's normal net take home pay (i.e. regular salary less mandatory deductions) and Worker's Compensation insurance payments for a period not to exceed seven hundred and twenty (720) hours per injury, not charged to the employees vacation, sick leave or other accumulated paid benefits, after a forty (40) hours initial waiting period per injury. The forty (40) hour waiting period shall be charged to the employee's sick leave account less Workers Compensation insurance payments applicable to those days. ARTICLE XX. LONGEVITY Effective July 1, 1978, the following terms and conditions are effective: 20.1 After four (4) years of continuous employment each employee shall be paid three and one-quarter percent (3.25%) of the employee's base rate. 20.2 After seven (7) years of continuous employment each employee shall be paid supplementary pay of five and one-quarter percent (5.25%) of the employee's base rate. 20.3 After ten (10) years of continuous employment each employee shall be paid supplementary pay of seven and one-quarter percent (7.25%) of the employee’s base rate. 20.4 After thirteen (13) years of continuous employment each employee shall be paid supplementary pay of nine and one-half percent (9.50%) of the employee's base rate. 10 ARTICLE XXI. VACATION 21.1 The following minimum vacation schedule shall apply to job classification covered by this Agreement: 0-5 years of service - 80 hours per year 6-10 years of service - 120 hours per year Over 10 years of service - eight additional hours per year not to exceed one hundred sixty eight hours. 21.2 Employees may reduce their vacation balance by cashing out a maximum of forty (40) hours per calendar year. 21.3 Effective 1-1-13, employees will be able to accrue a maximum of four hundred and eighty (480) hours of vacation leave. Once the maximum level of vacation is reached, additional leave will not be accrued until the balance falls below the maximum accrual level. Unused vacation leave up to the maximum balance of four hundred eighty (480) hours will be paid to employees who leave in good standing upon termination of employment. The first year of employment, new employees will be allowed to carry a negative balance of vacation to a maximum of -80 hours. 21.4 Transition to New Cap In November, 2012, employees who have more than the maximum accrual will be allowed to cash out up to 40 hours of vacation at the current base rate of pay. This is in addition to leave cashed out under 21.2. In January, 2013 any amount of vacation over two hundred (200) hours will be placed into an “Excess Vacation Accrual Account”. This is a one-time transfer. Employees will not be able to add any vacation to the EVAA after January, 2013. The balance in the EVAA will be reflected on the employee’s pay stub and can be used in the following ways: o Vacation or sick leave in one-hour increments. o In November of each year, employees will have the option of cashing out up to forty (40) hours of vacation leave at their current base rate of pay. The City Manager may allow a higher number for all employees, based on City finances. o Any remaining balance at termination will be cashed out at the current base rate of pay for employees who leave in good standing. 11 Excess Vacation Accrual Account (EVAA) Some employees hired prior to January 2013 have an EVAA that was set up to assist in the transition to the current accrual limits. Balances in EVAA accounts are reflected on employee pay stubs and can be used in the following ways: • Vacation or sick leave in one (1) hour increments. • In November of each year, employees will have the option of cashing out up to forty (40) hours of vacation leave at their current base rate of pay. The City Manager may allow a higher number for all employees, based on City finances. • Any remaining balance at termination will be cashed out at the current base rate of pay for employees who leave in good standing. ARTICLE XXII. SEVERANCE PAY Employees who voluntarily leave employment with the City of Edina with two (2) weeks notice, and who have completed at least twenty (20) years of continuous employment with the City, shall receive six (6) weeks of pay upon such termination. A person may only receive one severance payment from the City. Regular full-time employees who have sick leave benefits and leave the City in good standing shall receive a lump sum payment equal to 50% of his or her accrued and unused sick leave as of the date of separation. The maximum number of hours subject to this payment shall not exceed 960 hours (i.e., 1,920 hours of accrued and unused sick leave x 50% = 960 hours). The payment shall be based upon the employee’s rate of pay at the time of separation. The payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of separation. ARTICLE XXIII. SICK LEAVE WITH PAY 23.1 Employees shall accrue sick leave, at the rate of eight (8) hours per month. There is a maximum accumulation of nine hundred and sixty (960) hours. 23.2 Employees may reduce their sick leave balance one hundred twenty hours (120) to provide leave time in connection with the birth or adoption of a child. Paid sick leave may be used as defined in the City’s Personnel Policies/Employee Handbook. 23.3 Unused Sick Leave - Sick leave will accrue eight (8) hours per month to a maximum of 960 hours. On an annual basis, (January 1 to December 31) 25% of all hours of unused sick leave above 960 hours may be placed in an account that may be used and scheduled like vacation. Time from the unused sick leave account may be used only when it is not detrimental to the Employer. The maximum amount of unused sick time an employee can use annually is twenty-four (24) hours. There is no banking or accruing the time in the unused sick leave account; all time placed in the account must be used before the end of the year in which the time was placed in the account. All accounts will be cleared on 12 December 31st of each year. Employees whose sick leave balances drop below 960 hours are not eligible for this provision of the contract. 23.4 Employees hired prior to January 1, 2000 can rebid. Employees hired prior to January 1, 2000 will have thirty (30) days after the contract has been signed to decide as to what sick leave policy they would like to participate in. Once the employee=s decision is made, it will be final. (See new City policy on sick time.) ARTICLE XXIV. HOLIDAYS 24.1 Employees shall receive eighty-eight (88) hours each year. Employees have holidays calculated in the setting of their schedules. 24.2 For the purposes of this Article and Article 13.7 the holiday commences at 0000 hours the day of the official day and terminates at 2359 hours the day of the holiday. 24.3 All employees working a 5-2 or 4-3 schedule shall receive eight (8) hours floating holiday time for their use, which shall be scheduled by them in the same manner as vacation. ARTICLE XXV. EMPLOYEE FITNESS INCENTIVE 25.1 Eligibility for the employees’ fitness incentive shall be based upon the City of Edina's Police Fitness Program dated January 1, 1994. Employees eligible for the fitness incentive shall receive not more than $625.00 per year to be applied to the cost of dues or fees for membership or use of a qualifying fitness facility or program. In no event shall the amount of the incentive paid exceed the actual cost of the dues, fees or program costs. Eligible employees shall receive the fitness incentive in not more than two (2) payments to be issued within three (3) weeks after submission to the Employer of evidence required by the Fitness Incentive Program. ARTICLE XXVI. P.O.S.T. BOARD LICENSURE The City will pay the P.O.S.T. license fee for all employees covered by this contract. ARTICLE XXVII. WAIVER 27.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, are hereby superseded. 27.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations which result in this Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any term or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining. All agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this Agreement for the stipulated duration of this Agreement. 13 The Employer and the Union each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered by this Agreement, even though such terms or conditions may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed. ARTICLE XXVIII. DURATION This Agreement shall be effective January 1, 20146, except herein noted, and shall remain in full force and effect until the 31st day of December, 20157. In witness thereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this day of , 20146. FOR CITY OF EDINA FOR TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 ____________________________ City Manager Business Agent ____________________________ Human Resources Director Steward ____________________________ Steward 14 APPENDIX A 1. WAGE RATES FOR 2014 and 2015 2016 and 2017 January 1, 2014 (2%) January 1, 2015 (2.5%) Start $54,723.03 $56,091.11 Year 1 $58,356.60 $59,815.51 Year 2 $65,651.38 $67,292.67 Year 3 $72,945.94 $74,769.59 Year 4 $74,404.87 $76,264.99 Year 5 $75,081.42 $76,958.46 January 1, 2016 (2.5%) January 1, 2017 (3.0%) Start $57,493.39 $59,218.19 Year 1 $61,310.90 $63,150.22 Year 2 $68,974.99 $71,044.24 Year 3 $76,638.83 $78,937.99 Year 4 $78,171.61 $80,516.76 Year 5 $78,882.42 $81,248.89 2. Employees classified or assigned as a Field Training Officer shall receive $5.00 per hour (while performing the duties of Field Training Officer) in addition to their regular wages for 2014 and 2015 2016 and 2017. 3. Employees assigned as Training Officer, School Liaison, Detective or Narcotics Officer shall receive $375.00 per month in addition to their regular wages in 2014 and 2015 2016 and 2017. 15 AP P E N D I X B As s i g n m e n t E l i g i b i l i t y S e l e c t i o n P r o c e s s Te r m A f t e r A s s i g n m e n t Ro t a t i o n a l In v e s t i g a t o r 5 y e a r s wi t h E . P . D . Le t t e r o f I n t e r e s t . S e l e c t i o n b y s e n i o r i t y a n d q u a lif i c a t i o n s . Q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e b a s e d o n ac c e p t a b l e p e r f o r m a n c e r e c o r d s , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y m a na g e m e n t . Se n i o r i t y c o n s i d e r e d w h e n q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e e q u a l . Pr e f e r e n c e w i l l b e g i v e n t o q u a l i f i e d o f f i c e r s w h o ha v e n o t p r e v i o u s l y w o r k e d t h i s a s s i g n m e n t . 3 ye a r Re t u r n t o a u n i f o r m e d p a t r o l s h i f t f o r a m i n i m u m p e riod of o n e y e a r p r i o r t o b e i n g e l i g i b l e t o s e l e c t a n o t h er non pa t r o l p o s i t i o n . May submit for the traffic or flex annual po s i t i o n w i t h o u t r e t u r n i n g t o p a t r o l . Tr a i n i n g Of f i c e r 5 y e a r s wi t h E . P . D . Le t t e r o f I n t e r e s t . S e l e c t i o n b y s e n i o r i t y a n d q u a lif i c a t i o n s . Q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e b a s e d o n ac c e p t a b l e p e r f o r m a n c e r e c o r d s , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y m a na g e m e n t . Se n i o r i t y c o n s i d e r e d w h e n q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e e q u a l . Pr e f e r e n c e w i l l b e g i v e n t o q u a l i f i e d o f f i c e r s w h o ha v e n o t p r e v i o u s l y w o r k e d t h i s a s s i g n m e n t . 2 y e a r Re t u r n t o a u n i f o r m e d p a t r o l s h i f t f o r a m i n i m u m p e riod of o n e y e a r p r i o r t o b e i n g e l i g i b l e t o s e l e c t a n o t h er non pa t r o l p o s i t i o n . May submit for the traffic or flex annual po s i t i o n w i t h o u t r e t u r n i n g t o p a t r o l . Sc h o o l Re s o u r c e Of f i c e r 5 y e a r s wi t h E . P . D . Le t t e r o f I n t e r e s t . In t e r v i e w p a n e l c o n s i s t i n g o f s c h o o l s t a f f a n d a d m i ni s t r a t i o n . Pr e f e r e n c e w i l l b e g i v e n t o q u a l i f i e d o f f i c e r s w h o ha v e n o t p r e v i o u s l y w o r k e d t h i s a s s i g n m e n t . * 3 y e a r Re t u r n t o a u n i f o r m e d p a t r o l s h i f t f o r a m i n i m u m p e riod of o n e y e a r p r i o r t o b e i n g e l i g i b l e t o s e l e c t a n o t h er non pa t r o l p o s i t i o n . May submit for the traffic or flex annual po s i t i o n w i t h o u t r e t u r n i n g t o p a t r o l . Tr a f f i c O f f i c e r (1 P o s i t i o n ) 5 y e a r s wi t h E . P . D . Le t t e r o f I n t e r e s t . S e l e c t i o n b y s e n i o r i t y a n d q u a lif i c a t i o n s . Q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e b a s e d o n ac c e p t a b l e p e r f o r m a n c e r e c o r d s , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y m a na g e m e n t . Se n i o r i t y c o n s i d e r e d w h e n q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e e q u a l . 1 y e a r Ma y r e s u b m i t f o r t h e s a m e p o s i t i o n a n n u a l l y n o t t o ex c e e d 7 y e a r t i m e p e r i o d a w a y f r o m a u n i f o r m e d p a t rol sh i f t . M a y s u b m i t f o r o t h e r o p e n r o t a t i o n a l p o s i t i ons. Tr a f f i c O f f i c e r s (2 P o s i t i o n s ) 5 y e a r s wi t h E . P . D . Le t t e r o f I n t e r e s t . S e l e c t i o n b y s e n i o r i t y a n d q u a lif i c a t i o n s . Q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e b a s e d o n ac c e p t a b l e p e r f o r m a n c e r e c o r d s , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y m a na g e m e n t . Se n i o r i t y c o n s i d e r e d w h e n q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e e q u a l . Pr e f e r e n c e w i l l b e g i v e n t o q u a l i f i e d o f f i c e r s w h o ha v e n o t w o r k e d t h i s a s s i g n m e n t s i n c e J a n u a r y 01 st , 2 0 0 8 . 3 y e a r Re t u r n t o a u n i f o r m e d p a t r o l s h i f t f o r a m i n i m u m p e riod of o n e y e a r p r i o r t o b e i n g e l i g i b l e t o s e l e c t a n o t h er non pa t r o l p o s i t i o n . May submit for the traffic or flex annual po s i t i o n w i t h o u t r e t u r n i n g t o p a t r o l . Co m m e r c i a l Cr i m e ( F l e x – On e p o s i t i o n ) 5 y e a r s wi t h E . P . D . Le t t e r o f I n t e r e s t . Se l e c t i o n b y s e n i o r i t y a n d q u a l i f i c a t i o n s . Q u a l i f i ca t i o n s a r e b a s e d o n a c c e p t a b l e p e r f o r m a n c e re c o r d s , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y m a n a g e m e n t . Se n i o r i t y c o n s i d e r e d w h e n q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e e q u a l . 1 y e a r Ma y r e s u b m i t f o r t h e s a m e p o s i t i o n a n n u a l l y n o t t o ex c e e d 7 y e a r t i m e p e r i o d a w a y f r o m a u n i f o r m e d p a t rol sh i f t . M a y s u b m i t f o r o t h e r o p e n r o t a t i o n a l p o s i t i ons. Co m m e r c i a l Cr i m e ( F l e x – On e p o s i t i o n ) 5 y e a r s wi t h E . P . D . Le t t e r o f I n t e r e s t . S e l e c t i o n b y s e n i o r i t y a n d q u a lif i c a t i o n s . Q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e b a s e d o n ac c e p t a b l e p e r f o r m a n c e r e c o r d s , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y m a na g e m e n t . Se n i o r i t y c o n s i d e r e d w h e n q u a l i f i c a t i o n s a r e e q u a l . Pr e f e r e n c e w i l l b e g i v e n t o q u a l i f i e d o f f i c e r s w h o ha v e n o t w o r k e d t h i s a s s i g n m e n t s i n c e J a n u a r y 01 st , 2 0 0 8 . 3 y e a r Re t u r n t o a u n i f o r m e d p a t r o l s h i f t f o r a m i n i m u m p e riod of o n e y e a r p r i o r t o b e i n g e l i g i b l e t o s e l e c t a n o t h er non pa t r o l p o s i t i o n . May submit for the traffic or flex annual po s i t i o n w i t h o u t r e t u r n i n g t o p a t r o l . • M a n a g e m e n t r e t a i n s t h e r i g h t t o c o n t r o l p e r s o n n e l al l o c a t i o n a s o u t l i n e d i n A r t i c l e 5 . 1 o f t h e u n i o n la b o r a g r e e m e n t . • T h e m a x i m u m n u m b e r o f y e a r s a n o f f i c e r c a n w o r k a no n - p a t r o l p o s i t i o n o f a n y c a p a c i t y i s 7 y e a r s . A f te r 7 y e a r s , a n o f f i c e r m u s t r e t u r n t o a u n i f o r m e d pa t r o l s h i f t f o r a m i n i m u m p e r i o d o f o n e y e a r be f o r e b e i n g e l i g i b l e t o b i d a n o t h e r n o n - p a t r o l p o s it i o n . A n o f f i c e r w i l l n o t b e c o n s i d e r e d e l i g i b l e fo r a r o t a t i o n a l p o s i t i o n i f t h e t e r m o f t h e p o s i t i on w o u l d e x c e e d t h e 7 y e a r l e a v e f r o m a u n i f o r m e d p atrol sh i f t . • O f f i c e r s c u r r e n t l y w o r k i n g a n y o f t h e a s s i g n m e n t s in 2 0 1 1 w i l l c o m p l e t e t h e o r i g i n a l t e r m p r i o r t o a n y p a r t i c u l a r p o s i t i o n b e c o m i n g o p e n f o r s e l e c t i o n . • T h i s a g r e e m e n t w i l l c o m m e n c e o n 0 1 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 2 1- 1 - 2 0 1 6 an d r e m a i n i n e f f e c t f o r t h e d u r a t i o n o f t h e c o n t r a ct a g r e e m e n t , a t w h i c h t i m e t h i s a g r e e m e n t w i l l b e re v i e w e d a n d n e g o t i a t e d . * T h e t e r m o f t h e S R O p o s i t i o n m a y b e e x t e n d e d f o r a n a d d i t i o n a l y e a r ( m a x i m u m 4 y e a r s ) i f t h e r e a r e so m e t y p e o f e x t e n u a t i n g c i r c u m s t a n c e s a n d s p e c i a l re q u e s t f r o m t h e s c h o o l d i s t r i c t . 16 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between the CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT and the TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 on behalf of the POLICE OFFICERS Members of the bargaining unit will be eligible to participate in the department’s pilot advance resignation notice program as it may be amended from time to time on the same basis as for non-union members of the Police Department. For Teamsters Local 320; For the City of Edina; ______________________________ _____________________________ Michael Kopp, Business Agent Lisa Schaefer Kay E. McAloney, HR Director Dated_________________________ Dated________________________ 17 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between CITY OF EDINA and MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC and LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES’ UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 Statement of Purpose The Health Care Savings Plan (HCSP) is a program that allows City of Edina regular full-time employees to set aside their severance benefit into an account to pay medical expenses and/or health insurance premiums after they are no longer employed by the City. Employees can choose between investment options provided by the plan administrator. Assets in the account accumulate tax-free and, since payouts are used for qualified medical expenses, they remain tax-free. Eligibility The City of Edina and the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union Local 320 agree that members in the Police Officer Bargaining Unit will participate in the City’s Health Care Savings Plan outlined as follows: Program Severance payments upon termination of employment will be used to fund the HCSP. • Employees with less than five years of service do not contribute to the HCSP. • For all employees with five or more years of service participation in the HCSP is mandatory. • Employees eligible to receive a severance payment for unused sick leave at termination of employment must contribute 100% of the sick leave portion of their severance to the HCSP. • Employees eligible to receive a severance payment for unused vacation at termination must contribute 100% of the vacation portion of their severance to the HCSP account. • Employees eligible to receive a severance payment for unused time in their Excess Vacation Accrual Account (EVAA) at termination must contribute 100% of the EVAA portion of their severance to the HCSP account. • Employees eligible to receive six weeks of severance pay at termination instead of payment for sick leave must contribute the entire six weeks of severance payment to their HCSP account. • In some cases, current law or IRS guidelines may allow an employee to opt-out of this program. Employees may not opt out of or otherwise be considered ineligible to contribute to the HCSP except as permitted by law and approved by the City’s Plan Administrator. Such election to waive participation is irrevocable. For Teamsters Local 320; For the City of Edina; ______________________________ _____________________________ Michael Kopp, Business Agent Lisa Schaefer Kay E. McAloney, HR Director Dated_________________________ Dated________________________ Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IV.O. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kay McAloney, Director of Human Resources Item Activity: Subject:City Manager Employment Agreement- First Amendment Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the First Amendment to the City Manager's employment contract as presented. INTRODUCTION: Based on direction from the City Council at the February 24, 2016 Closed session, staff has prepared the attached first amendment to the 2015-2017 City Manager's Employment Contract . ATTACHMENTS: Description Scott Neal 2015-2017 Contract Scott Neal First Amendment to 2015-2017 Contract EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into effective this 3rd day of February, 2015, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Employer"), and SCOTT H. NEAL ("Employee"). The parties agree as follows: 1. POSITION. Employer agrees to employ Employee as its City Manager and as the Executive Director of its Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Employee agrees to serve in the positions in accordance with state statutes and City ordinances and to perform such other legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Council shall from time to time assign. 2. TERM AND TERMINATION. The term of this Agreement shall be three (3) years commencing on the effective date of this Agreement, which shall be January 1, 2015. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the Employee to resign at any tine during the term of this Agreement by giving notice and otherwise complying with the conditions set forth in this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the Employer to terminate the services of the Employee at any time, at the sole discretion of the Employer, in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 3. PENSION PLAN Employer shall contribute to PERA as required by State law for Employee or an alternate pension plan, if selected by Employee, as authorized by State law. 1 4. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Employer agrees to conduct an annual performance review of the Employee during January of each year. The review shall be in accordance with specific criteria developed jointly by the Employer and the Employee. Such criteria may be added to or deleted as the Employer may from time to time determine in consultation with the Employee. The Employer shall provide the Employee with a written performance review and provide adequate opportunity for the Employee to discuss the review with the Employer in closed session, as allowed by Minnesota State Statutes. The failure of the Employer to conduct the annual review shall not affect the parties' respective rights to terminate. this Agreement or any other rights in the Agreement 5. SALARY. The annual salary of the Employee shall be determined by mutual agreement of the Employer and the Employee, and subject only to the terms of this Agreement, and the Minnesota local government employee salary cap (Minn. Stat. 43A.17). Subject to receiving satisfactory performance reviews by the Employer, the Employer and Employee mutually agree to following: A. Effective January 1, 2015 the council approves an increase in annual salary of 2.5% for a total of $166,630 annually. Recognizing that Minn • Stat. 43A.17 currently limits compensation to $165,003, Employee's actual salary effective January 1, 2015 will be $165,003. • The City Council intends to apply for a waiver with the state to increase the salary limit. If that waiver is granted, employee's salary will be increased to the waiver amount or to $166,630, whichever is less. If the waiver is not 2 granted, Employer agrees to grant Employee a lump sum of 20 hours of additional paid vacation leave. B. Effective January 1, 2015, and on each subsequent January 1st of this agreement, Employee's annual salary shall be adjusted to the Minnesota local government employee salary cap in effect on that date.; 6. PAID LEAVE. Employee shall earn paid sick leave at the rate of 3.69 hours per payroll period and paid vacation leave at the rate of 6.15 hours per payroll period. The Employee shall accrue no more than 600 hours of paid sick leave and no more than 400 hours of paid vacation leave during the term of employment. 100% of Employee's accrued paid vacation time and 50% of Employee's accrued paid sick leaves are compensable at severance, subject to the terms of section 15 of this agreement. Employee shall have the option to reduce hours of paid leave by converting it to cash compensation no more than twice each year at the Employee's then hourly rate of pay in increments of no less than hour 40 hours and no more than 120 hours. Employee shall be entitled to paid holiday leave, bereavement leave, leave without pay on the same basis as the City's Department Director employees are receiving on January 1, 2015. Any future changes to the City's paid leave policies shall not change the level of benefit for the Employee, unless the parties so agree. Employee shall be credited with having completed sixteen (16) years of employment with the City upon his first day of employment, November 8, 2010. 3 7. BENEFITS. In lieu of the City contribution to the employee cafeteria plan, Employer shall pay 100% of the cost to provide hospital, medical and dental insurance to Employee and his dependents under a plan offered to other employees. Employee will receive employer-paid life insurance and long-term disability as is provided to all other full-time employees. If Employee wishes to receive other benefits Employee must pay 100% of the cost In the event the Federal 2012 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires the Employer to change, modify or amend its current employee hospital, medical and dental insurance program, Employer shall not to reduce the cash value of this benefit to the Employee. 8. DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS. Employer shall budget and pay the professional dues, subscriptions, and travel and subsistence expenses for Employee which are deemed reasonable and necessary for Employee's continued participation in national, regional, state and local associations 'necessary and desirable including: International City/County Management Association, Minnesota City/County Management Association, National League of Cities and the League of Minnesota Cities. Employee shall use good judgment in his outside activities so he will not neglect his primary duties to the Employer. 9. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. After the completion of three years of employment, Employer agrees to provide the Employee the opportunity, at Employee's discretion, to attend the International City/County Management Association's Senior Executive Leadership Institute (ICMA-SEI) at the University of Virginia's Darden School of Business in 4 Charlottesville, Virginia. Employer agrees to budget and pay for all expenses related to Employee's attendance at the ICMA-SEI, including tuition, books, materials, travel and lodging. 10. CIVIC CLUB MEMBERSHIP Employer recognizes the desirability of• representation in and before local civic and other organizations. Employee is authorized, at the Employer's expense, to become a member of such civic clubs or organizations as deemed appropriate by Employee and Employer, including, but not limited to, the Edina Chamber of Commerce and the Edina Noon Rotary Club. 11. AUTOMOBILE. Employee shall be reimbursed for the personal use of his automobile on City business on a per mile basis in accordance with IRS regulations. 12. WORK TOOLS. Employer agrees to provide Employee with contemporary technology devices such as a mobile telephone, computer and other devices which are, in the judgment of the parties, necessary to accomplish the work of the Employee. Employer acknowledges the Employee may make regular personal use of the devices. Employee recognizes that devices and tools provided to the Employee by the Employer under this section of the agreement are and remain property of the Employer. Employee agrees to return said property to the Employer no later than the Employee's final date of employment. 13. GENERAL EXPENSES. Employer shall reimburse Employee reasonable miscellaneous job related expenses which it is anticipated Employee Will incur from time to time when provided appropriate documentation. 5 14. HOURS OF WORK. It is mutually understood the Employee is a FLSA- exempt employee without set hours of work, but is expected to be available at all times and to engage in those hours of work, subject only to illness, injury and scheduled annual vacations, that are necessary to fulfill the obligations of the City Manager's position. It is understood that the position of City Manager requires attendance at evening meetings and occasionally at weekend meetings. It is understood by Employee that additional compensation and compensatory time shall not be allowed for such additional expenditures of time. It is further understood that Employee may absent himself from the office to a reasonable extent in consideration of extraordinary time expenditures for evening and weekend meetings at other than normal working hours. Employee may engage in teaching, consulting, speaking or perform other non-City connected activities for which he is compensated without consent of the Employer provided the activities do not diminish the Employee's ability to perform the essential duties of the City Manager position, as described in sections 1 and 14 herein, and provided the activities do not conflict with the interests of the Employer. Employee agrees to provide written notice to Employer of activities conducted under this paragraph. 15. TERMINATION BENEFITS. In the event that Employee is terminated by the Employer during such time that Employee is willing and able to perform the duties of City Manager, then in that event, Employer agrees to pay Employee at the time of receipt of his last pay check a lump sum cash payment equal to six (6). months aggregate salary and to continue to provide and pay for the benefits set forth in paragraph 9 for a period of six (6) months following 6 termination. However, in the event Employee is terminated because of his malfeasance in office, gross misconduct, conviction for a felony, or conviction for an illegal act involving personal gain to Employee, then Employer shall have no obligation to pay the termination benefits. If Employer at any time during the employment term reduces the salary or other financial benefits of Employee in a greater percentage than across-the-board reduction for all non-union employees, or if Employer refuses, following written notice, to comply with any other provisions of this Agreement benefiting Employee or Employee resigns following a formal suggestion by Employer that he resign, then Employee may, at his option, be deemed to be "terminated" on the effective date of Employee's resignation and the Employee shall also be entitled to receive the termination benefits set forth above. If Employee voluntarily resigns his position with Employer, Employee agrees to give the Employer thirty (30) days advance notice. If Employee voluntarily resigns his position with Employer, there shall be no termination benefits, as provided in this paragraph, due to Employee. 16. INDEMNIFICATION. The Employer shall defend and indemnify the Employee against and for all losses sustained by the Employee in direct consequences of the discharge of the Employee's duties on the behalf of the Employer. In the event the Employee serves on boards of directors of City-related legal entities, the Employer shall extend the same indemnification benefits and protections to Employee for the City-related entity as is provided for the Employee for actions taken on behalf of the Employer. Employer may compromise and settle, without the consent of Employee, any such claim or suit and pay the amount of the settlement or judgment rendered thereon. This covenant shall survive the termination of this agreement, but shall not obligate the Employer to pay punitive or exemplary damages which may 7 EMPLOYEE: SCOTT H. NEAL EMPLOYER: CITY OF EDIN BY Mayor AND City Clerk be awarded but Employer may, in its sole discretion, elect to do so to the extent authorized by law. 17. OTHER CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT. Subject to any amendments, the City's ordinances, City Employee policies, and State Statutes, are all incorporated herein except to the extent that they conflict with this Employment Agreement, wherein this Employment Agreement shall be controlling. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer has caused this Agreement to be signed and executed on its behalf by its Mayor and City Clerk, and Employee has signed this Agreement, in duplicate, the day and year first written above. I 8 186089v1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 15th day of March, 2016, by and between the CITYOF EDINA (“City”) and SCOTT NEAL (“Employee”). The parties agree as follows: 1. AMENDMENT. The parties have previously entered into an Employment Agreement dated February 3, 2015 (“Agreement”). The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect except as modified by this First Amendment. 2. SALARY. Effective January 1, 2016, Employee’s annual salary shall be adjusted to $170,285.00, the amount approved in the local government compensation limit waiver authorized by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Office of Management and Budget. The annual salary shall be adjusted on each subsequent January 1st of this agreement by either the annual adjustment approved by the Minnesota Office of Management and Budget or by the increase approved by the City Council for the unrepresented employees of the City of Edina, whichever is less. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this First Amendment to Employment Agreement to be signed and executed on its behalf by its Mayor and Employee has signed this Agreement, the day and year first written above. CITY: EMPLOYEE: CITY OF EDINA James Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Chad A. Millner, Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Update Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: Staff from Three Rivers Park District will provide an update on the project and address the recently received communications from residents in the Lake Edina area. Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Speak Up, Edina February Discussion Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No Action Requested. INTRODUCTION: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. Since January 2014, organized monthly discussions have been held on the site. The February 2016 discussion focused on volunteerism. In addition to those who volunteer on the City of Edina’s advisory boards and commissions, the City also relies on community volunteers for a variety of needs to augment staff. Many service and volunteer clubs and organizations exist throughout the community, offering residents ways to get involved. The City asked the following questions: Do you volunteer? In what capacity? Why? If you could create your own volunteer position (whether or not with the City), what would it be? If you volunteered for the City of Edina, what would you hope to get out of the experience? The discussion was open for comments between Jan. 28 and March 7. During that time, 13 comments were made. Additionally, 637 users visited the site 812 times, garnering 2,701 page views. All commenters in this discussion were from Edina. ATTACHMENTS: Description Comments Volunteerism Closed Mar 07, 2016 · Discussion · 7 Participants · 3 Topics · 13 Answers · 2 Replies · 7 Votes 7 3 13 2 7 PARTICIPANTS TOPICS ANSWERS REPLIES VOTES SUMMARY OF TOPICS DO YOU VOLUNTEER? 5 Answers · 0 Replies Do you volunteer? In what capacity? Why? Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Jan 29, 2016 10:03 pm 1 Votes I've always volunteered, even when I worked full time - with my professional organization (5 times state president) at church (multiple committee chairs), for kids sports (coached dozens of teams), at school (site council president) and on many special short term assignments. Now that I'm retired - my "job title" is community volunteer. I've served the city on a couple different boards and commissions (in leadership roles), on working groups (from the Yorktown Community Garden to the Greater Southdale Planning Group) to helping the city staff with a board and commission volunteer survey a few years ago. When invited to attend focus groups or complete surveys - I do as, just as I always respond to Speak Up Edna discussions. My business life was strategic planning and market research - so I believe that organizations need to keep well informed about what people think and want. Cities and community organizations exist to serve peoplle's needs and it is just too easy to think you know what people want and think without bothering to ask them. Cities can get overwhelmed if a big crowd with an axe to grind show up at a meeting, so they are a little afraid of input - but it is important to ask a broad sample of people what they think and not confine their remarks to only the topics the city sees as front burner. I think that when people like me who want everyone's attitudes to be solicited and acknowledged it is a good thing - and something city staff have trouble doing without outside help. Of course, you can pay for these services, but the city gets more value if it involves volunteer in fact fiinding. Dorene Wernke · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Feb 02, 2016 2:01 pm 0 Votes I have volunteered my entire working life. Not only did I volunteer while working for Target Stores in corporate headquarters, I continued volunteering when we lived overseas for 3 years. Since returning in 1999, I trained to become a Guardian ad Litem in Hennepin County because I felt it was important to have a different perspective and to remain grounded in my community. I've now done this for almost 15 years, and although it can be difficult, it can also be rewarding to advocate for children who have no voice. As a family we have always volunteered, because we felt it was important to give back to the community, especially because we have been so fortunate. Sometimes volunteering can involve fund raising, which I've done for a non-profit whose board I've sat on twice. 1 of 6 Full Report Volunteerism Closed Mar 07, 2016 · Discussion · 7 Participants · 3 Topics · 13 Answers · 2 Replies · 7 Votes For some of us, we have been very blessed in our lives; but for others, it's a constant struggle. Volunteering time and talent is a good way to get "outside yourself", so you don't get so caught up in your own life's issues. The feeling I get volunteering is unlike any other feeling you experience. Barbara La Valleur · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Feb 24, 2016 2:10 pm 0 Votes Like Joel & Dorene, I've volunteered my entire life. In retirement, it brings me great joy to give back to the community that provides so much for us. Currently I am serving my last year of two three-year terms on the Edina Arts & Culture Commission and am Chair of Public Art Edina. I've been on that group for over five years, the last three as chair. Volunteering is a positive way to spend my time and make a difference in the community and give me an outlet to demonstrate my passion for the arts and in particular public art. Rosemary Schwedes · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Mar 02, 2016 10:48 am 0 Votes I volunteer at the Minneapolis Institute, helping visitors find what they are looking for, making recommendations, explaining special exhibits and museum procedures. It's very rewarding and puts me in a world that I very much enjoy. Betty Hemstad · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Mar 02, 2016 8:30 pm 0 Votes Now that I've had my 80th birthday instead of answering "Do you volunteer" I'd like to answer "Did you volunteer"? Volunteering began in the 60s as a Brownie Leader and lending support in the schools through the PTA. As our children grew up it meant being a Concert Band Parent and traveling with the band to Chicago. When the schools merged, I served on the committee turning Edina East into the Edina Community Center. In 1988 I co-chaired the Edina Centennial and as a result we raised enough money to build the present Edina Historical Museum. Also in the 80's, serving on the Edina Foundation Board for nine years...one year as president. Served on all the Edinamite committees (about 10) to raise funds for multiple organizations in Edina. Served on the founding Edina Public Art Committee. In 2013 I was part of the 125th Quasquicentennial. And more! Do I believe that volunteers played and play an important part in making Edina what it is today? Absolutely. I believe that even one person can make a difference, and I considered it a privilege and an honor to play a small part in the life of our wonderful community. I encourage everyone to volunteer and find some way to be of service. CREATE YOUR OWN 5 Answers · 1 Replies If you could create your own volunteer position (whether or not with the City), what would it be? Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Jan 29, 2016 10:23 pm 1 Votes I make an effort to inform myself of what the city has to offer. However,, when I think 2 of 6 Full Report Volunteerism Closed Mar 07, 2016 · Discussion · 7 Participants · 3 Topics · 13 Answers · 2 Replies · 7 Votes about what I know the city already has available as volunteer opportunities, I am not able to visualize a list - and am not aware of anywhere on the website which is a resource for all city volunteer opportunities. Take for example the board and commissions. At the time, there are vacancies, it is posted - but at other times in the year, there is no call to action of people who might be interested. Several of the boards and commisssions have working groups, but there is no essentially no information about what thy do and how one gets appointed. If you know someone to show the ropes or have been around forever, you probably can figure it out, but for people new to the community who want to connect as a way to do good and connect with other people, there is no clear idea how to figure it out. Before you add new programs, you need to think about going more to publicize what you offer already. For each program, there should be information - contact person, responsibilities, time commitment, desired skill set, when and how to apply and how many people are serving in roles already or could be added. Volunteers are more eager to join an effort where it is clear what is the commitment and what they can expect to get in terms of personal satisfaction from it. If it is on the website, it isn't very prominent. While this position might already may be in place (I haven't noticed), I think that the city should have a highly visible volunteer coordinator who is engaged every day in recruiting, rewarding and retaining volunteers - and using current volunteers to recruit additional ones. To the degree you get well qualified volunteers playing clear, meaningful,, impactful roles, you greatly extend what the city can do and increase citizen engagement. Being more user friendly to volunteers will make the city a friendlier place as a whole. Particularly with seniors, many who have had high level, high impact jobs, getting them involved enhances city life and their individual quality of life. If you want to use volunteers more effectively, then figure out the skills and interests of your target group, and then structure positions to fit their skills. People are generally happy to make significant time if they can see the personal and community benefits. And if you want to create a more appealing approach, why not recruit community volunteers to help to the planning. When I volunteered for planning the community garden, as I had done community gardening in another community with a mature program, I wanted to get involved and brought knowledge that changed how the program was done in positive ways. That is how things work best - when those who use services help to plan how they are operated., Response: Jordan Gilgenbach · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · Feb 02, 2016 4:26 pm Hi Joel! Thanks for your thorough comment and advice! I just wanted to note that we reworked the question asked above. For reference, here is what was asked previously: "What volunteer opportunities would you like to see that don't currently exist in Edina or surrounding communities?" That said, I'd be curious your answer to the new question, too! Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Feb 02, 2016 5:03 pm 1 Votes Thanks, Jordan. The volunteer position I"d volunteer to fill would be research advisor - as that is how I have extended my work career as a volunteer. For example, I'm now serving on the Greater Southdale Planning group, as a resident and concerned citizen. We have a great number of high quality members -- particularly people who do property development - who really grasp what the city is trying to do. We have the assignment of engaging wth different audences regarding how they react to our ideas and also to ask for theirs. The building contractors have a huge base of knowledge, but I have a huge 3 of 6 Full Report Volunteerism Closed Mar 07, 2016 · Discussion · 7 Participants · 3 Topics · 13 Answers · 2 Replies · 7 Votes base of experience getting people comfortable answering questions during an interview, using a survey or in a focus group. Two or three of us will be doing individual interviews, with me moderating the session, writing the questions and interpreting the results for the review of the group. This is very similar to what I did for my past employers.. I'm able to ask good questions and pull out good information even if I may not have the subject matter expertise of the people I'm working with. It is a good partnership, which they have been open to. I intend to repeat the process, if desired, for two other audiences - business owners and local residents. ff you dig around a bit, you will find I have done quite a number of these kinds of projects for the city and would like to do more. However, I'd be even more useful as a resource for anyone at city hall that is considering doing opinion research and is struggling with what they want to know, how to ask the right question and presenting results to promote action. As a volunteer, I'm free and looking for more opportunities, but would be most effective if pulled in to advise about research at the strategic as well as the tactical level. I have also taught research classes, worked in the area of quality improvement, done employee surveys - pretty much any non-financial analysis that a large organization does. It is most frustrating with a project like the Quality of Life study, that could be used to improve not just quality of city services but quality of life of all residents, not being used with great utility. The Council gets the results and seeing to struggle what to do with them. Actually, when developing the questions, you need to have a potential purpose for every question, which makes you put in a lot more effort to identify topics of interest and ask the right people th right questions in the right way to get the right answers that lead to action. As a market researcher who worked constantly with marketing people and department heads, I realize they don't have the time or inclination to work heavily and may in fact not have thought of the benefits. Whether it be with your internal management or the council, I think that I could make a compelling case for this. And I'm not suggesting I be the city's only research advisor. Those people will skills are out there and would be willing to volunteer to help make cty decisions more research decisions, with the goal to doing what is necessary to provide the highest quality of life to all Edina residents. Jon DeMars Victorsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Feb 18, 2016 6:30 am 0 Votes Buckthorn Eradication Deputy with authority to cut, poison, uproot the plant/tree from city parks and property. We are literally loosing ground (forest?) on this issue! Barbara La Valleur · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Feb 24, 2016 2:39 pm 0 Votes Because I will be stepping done a year from now from the Arts & Culture Commission, and will also be resigning as Chair of Public Art, I would love to be the city's first Artistic Advisor. That may not be the eventual name of the position, yet what I envision is being called on by different City Departments to attend meetings and have an artistic voice at the beginning of building and construction projects that affect all residents and visitors to our community. Having someone passionate about public art, which I am, will ensure that the outcome of these projects will be more artistically and visually pleasing. This is something that is often not even considered or, if considered, happens too late in the process to take action. Whether wayfinding and placemaking of our multistory parking ramps (of which I was a part last year) or designing buildings or roads, bringing an artistic eye to these projects would hopefully result in a city known as aesthetically pleasing. 4 of 6 Full Report Volunteerism Closed Mar 07, 2016 · Discussion · 7 Participants · 3 Topics · 13 Answers · 2 Replies · 7 Votes CITY VOLUNTEERS 3 Answers · 1 Replies If you volunteered for the City of Edina, what would you hope to get out of the experience? Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Jan 29, 2016 10:40 pm 2 Votes I am already volunteering. However I am term limited off of board and commission service after 7 years in March and while I'm on the Greater Southdale Planning group already, I would be more likely to do more if I weren't required to do a big search on the city website or make a lot of phone calls to figure out what else might be available. Here is how it should work. A person thinks - I think I might want to volunteer for city service. They go to the city website - and see language that asks the question - do you want to volunteer at the city. They click on a link and see an array of current and future opportunities - basically talking about things that are going to be open over next 12 months. In addition, they would see "create your own opportunity" - sort of like the good Edina idea on the top of this page, except where people who suggest an idea also are asked to say what they would personally do to make things happen. It is sort of like a whopping cart like you see in e-commerce - where you can create a wish list for yourself. At the end, you can indicate you want a position (with a direct link to an application) or a "contact me" link - if you want to talk with someone before you commit. This essentially removes any unntentional barriers to people showing their interest.. When it comes to the world of paid employment, a person never expects an easy application process or even to hav their application welcomed. Recruting volunteers should be made as easy for those who are interested as it is hard for job applicants. With volunteers, you want to be inclusive - sort of like the "no cut" policy in youth sports. Not just cherry pick the best applicants and throw the rest away - but work with the people who step forward. Not turning a large number of people, or discouraging people from volunteering, you need to cultivate a welcoming, appreciative attitude, as with people with the skills of Edina residents, getting as many of them involvled in the community - at the city or elsewhere - makes Edina a better place. If you wanted to be really expansive in your thinking, eventually, you would try to direct people to other Edina-based volunteer opportunitiies, as a way to connect with other organizations that are also seeking to better community life. As Park and Rec is so connected with the Youth Sports organizations that need lots of volunteers and boosters, there are some pretty obvious places where this volunteer collaboration could begin - to see how well it works. Response: Jordan Gilgenbach · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · Feb 02, 2016 4:31 pm Joel, great advice on how we could better display and streamline the opportunities available with the City! Your comments are much appreciated. Wanted to note again, that the question asked above was updated. For reference, here is what was previously asked: "Would you volunteer for the City of Edina once a formal volunteer program is in place? Why or why not?" I know you are a long-time volunteer for the community. Here's a good follow-up question for you: What do you get out of your volunteer experience? What keeps you coming back? 5 of 6 Full Report Volunteerism Closed Mar 07, 2016 · Discussion · 7 Participants · 3 Topics · 13 Answers · 2 Replies · 7 Votes As always, thanks for your feedback! Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Feb 02, 2016 6:05 pm 1 Votes Personal benefits. In retirement. I enjoy volunteering and try to contribute heavily wherever I do so to making the organization better to the benefit of those who work there and receive services. I made such a difference in significant ways for each organization I worked. Sometimes, it was appreciated, other times I had to communicate difficult things that leaders preferred not to hear or address, at least immediately. Sometimes they did so two or three years later when they had to or they finally bought the idea. I hope to have that kind of big impact on the city of Edina. Whether it is always appreciated isn't important - I draw satisfaction from results and being brought in on new projects. I can visualize Edina being one of the great places in the world and to the degree I can contribute to that I am all in. Planning and research are hard and time consuming, and require getting rid of the idea of "good enough." Good enough leaves lots of people behind. I would like Edina to use its massively talented and engaged citizens to achieve great things. We "achieve" Edina by putting in the work required, realizing what staff and city budgets can achieve alone is just not enough. 6 of 6 Full Report Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2016-36 Subdivision of 7600 Metro Boulevard for Edina Public Schools. Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2016-36 approving both Preliminary and Final Plat. INTRODUCTION: Independent School District No. 273, the Edina School District is requesting a subdivision of 7600 Metro Boulevard. The purpose of the request is to divide off 9.29 acres from the existing 20.60 acre parcel that is the currently occupied by Film Tec. The School District would like to use the 9.29 acre site as the future home of a new bus garage. Site Plan Review would be required when the School District is ready to proceed with a proposal. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval at their February 24, 2016 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Minutes Resolution No. 2016-36 Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Devepment Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2016-32 & 2016-33 Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Rezoning for properties at the northwest corner of 66th and York. DLC Residential LLC. Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2016-32 and No. 2016-33 approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. INTRODUCTION: DLC Residential, LLC is proposing to redevelop the 5.6 acre office building sites at 6550 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings and redevelop the site with the following two phase development: Phase 1 (3250 66th Street West): A 6-7 story, 227-unit apartment building, with two levels of underground parking, a club room, fitness area, and a green roof with an amenity terrace, including a pool. Phase 2 (6650 Xerxes Avenue): A 5-6 story, 145-unit apartment building. Five and four floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. The primary entrance to the site would be off Xerxes Avenue. There is a secondary access available off of York. Both of these access points exist today. There is a shared access arrangement with the adjacent property owner at 3316 66th Street west. That shared access would also remain. This application was submitted after the effective date of the City’s new affordable housing policy of requiring 10% of the units to be affordable in a rezoning request does apply. However, the plans were developed and sketch plan review occurred prior to the adoption of the policy. The applicant is proposing 5% of the project (11 units in Phase 1 and 7 units in Phase 2.) The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 7 Ayes and 2 Nays. A motion to approve the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan failed. Vote: 4 Ayes and 5 Nays. (See attached Planning Commission minutes.) The main concern of the Planning Commission was in regard to the traffic study. As a result, staff requested the City's consultant, Kimley- Horn to revise their traffic study to address the concerns and update/increase the anticipated growth numbers in the surrounding area. The revised study is attached. The revised study still concludes that there are no improvements that need to be made to the existing roadway system. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report Attachments to Staff Report Resolution 2016-32 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Resolution 2016-33 Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan Udated Traffic Study Planning Commission Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Cary Teague Community Development Director Meeting Date February 24, 2016 Agenda # V.B. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Project Description DLC Residential, LLC is proposing to redevelop the 5.6 acre office building sites at 6550 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West. (See property location on pages A1– A5.) The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings and redevelop the site with the following two phase development: Phase 1 (3250 66th Street West): A 6-7 story, 227-unit apartment building, with two levels of underground parking, a club room, fitness area, and a green roof with an amenity terrace, including a pool. Phase 2 (6650 Xerxes Avenue): A 5-6 story, 145-unit apartment building. Five and four floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. The primary entrance to the site would be off Xerxes Avenue. There is a secondary access available off of York. Both of these access points exist today. There is a shared access arrangement with the adjacent property owner at 3316 66th Street west. That shared access would also remain. See narrative and plans on pages A6–A45, and larger scale plans in the attached development book. This application was submitted after the effective date of the City’s new affordable housing policy of requiring 10% of the units to be affordable in a rezoning request does apply. The applicant is proposing only 3% of the project (7 units in Phase 1 and 4 units in Phase 2.) 2 To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: Re-guiding of the site from RM, Regional Medical to CAC, Community Activity Center. As discussed during the sketch plan review of this project; the proposal to re- guide the property to CAC includes the three parcels to the east at 6444, 6500 and 6525 Xerxes Avenue. Those three property owners have agreed to the re- guiding of their property. This is the only Comprehensive Plan Amendment requested; the proposed height (7 stories) and density (66 units per acre) would meet the standards of the CAC. In addition, the following land use applications are requested: Preliminary Rezoning from POD-1&2, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and Preliminary Development Plan. This review is the first of a two-step process of review. Should the Preliminary Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment be approved, the following are required for the second step: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. The applicant would make any changes/revisions necessary from the preliminary plans, and submit a final development plan and rezoning application. That final review is then a review for consistency with the approved preliminary plans before the City Council and adoption of the Zoning Ordinance for the PUD. 2. Staff submittal of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the sketch plans on pages A122-A124; and the minutes from those meetings on pages A125–A130.) The sketch plans were generally well received; the applicant has developed the proposed plans by attempting to address issues that were raised by the Planning Commission and City Council at Sketch Plan. (See pages A13-A14 of the applicant narrative that highlights the changes made since sketch plan.) Those changes include: Inclusion of the easterly adjacent parcels in the Application for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. 3 While the south setbacks have been maintained as previously shown, the upper levels of Phase I and all of Phase II are moved southwards to free up land on the north end of the site for possible extension of 65th Street. The Phase I, underground parking footprint has been shortened so it no longer extends under the requested future ROW. The floor elevations of the buildings have been lowered about six feet. Both levels of the parking garage are deeper into the ground. As a result, the terraces built over the parking have a much better relationship to elevations of the adjacent land and relate much more closely to the internal pedestrian street. The residential amenities that were previously located on the upper level of the garage are moved up to the first floor where they now have a direct relationship to the street level lobby, the guest parking and to 66th Street. The dwelling units previously located on first floor of the south end of the Phase I building, are relocated to the fifth floor, thereby adding strength and prominence to the south façade of Phase I on 66th Street. The character of the internal street has been enhanced. The southward extension of York Avenue is enhanced with upgraded paving materials, pedestrian scaled lighting and stoops, stairs and benches so it will function as an attractive north-south pedestrian link between the residential neighborhood to the north and the Southdale District on the south. This revised plans show landscaping of the “free-right” turn lane at the 66th & York intersection. The south elevation of the Phase I building has been modified to further emphasize its position as a gateway to this District. The five-story wing has been moved forward to increase its visibility along 66th Street. The one story base has been increased in height to a story-and-a half with added sun-screens and pedestrian features. And the height of the six- story portion has been increased and exaggerated by the addition of a tall, illuminated parapet that will anchor the northward view of the York Avenue street corridor. This parapet will also conceal the roof-mounted cell phone towers that will be installed on its roof. Dwelling unit count in Phase I has been reduced from 230 apartments to 227 but the number of bedrooms has increased from 320 to 338. The gross area of Phase I has increased from 243,800 square feet to 255,008 square feet. 4 Phase I residential parking has increased from 379 cars to 391; 353 parking spaces are enclosed and secure for residents; and 38 spaces are on the surface and can be used by visitors and guests. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A multi-story York of Edina condos; zoned PRD-4, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Easterly: City of Richfield; Commercial shopping center. Southerly: Southdale Center; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Westerly: Office buildings; zoned POD, Planned Office District and guided Regional Medical. Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.6 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains two office buildings with surrounding surface parking. The access to the site from 66th street is share with the adjacent property owner to the west. There is also a shared access and parking agreement with this property, and an access agreement to York Avenue to the north. (See pages A2–A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: RM – Regional Medical. (See page A5.) Zoning: POD – 1 & 2, Planned Office District. (See page A5a.) Site Circulation Access to the site would be available in the same three locations of today; from Xerxes, 66th Street and York. (See page A82.) Shared easements would remain in place with the property owner to the west, for access, circulation and parking. Circulation includes access out to York Avenue. Pedestrian paths are planned for the site. A sidewalk is proposed along 66th and along Xerxes. This sidewalk should be constructed to extend to the property boundary on Xerxes. (See page A32.) Another sidewalk is proposed north-south through the project; this sidewalk should also be extended to York Avenue. (See page A32.) These shall be made a condition of any approval. (See engineering memo dated February 12, 2016 on pages A114-A115.) These sidewalks will provide the pedestrian access to Southdale for not only residents within this project, but residents to the north. Phase 2 would include 5 a second north south sidewalk on the east side of the drive-aisle. (See page A27.) As a result of the recent discussions with Hennepin County regarding elimination of right turn lanes at this intersection; it is likely that the County would be open to eliminating the “free right”. The County would not want to vacate the right-of-way; rather, we would like to use the space for more comfortable pedestrian crossings and public/green space. The applicant had demonstrated what that space could be in their proposed plans showing the green space landscaping and wide sidewalk to the street. (See page A32.) The applicant would be required to participate in cost sharing for improvements made for pedestrian circulation if these options are further developed. This shall be incorporated into the development agreement. Staff will continue to explore and study these options with the County. It would not impact the proposed development itself in terms of building location. Traffic & Parking Study Kimley Horn conducted a parking and traffic study. (See the attached study on pages A46–A108.) The Study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing adjacent roadways and there would be adequate parking provided. No roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed site development. (See page A77 of the study.) Concern has been raised by residents to the north of this project. (See attached petition.) The traffic study has concluded that 32% of the outbound trips from the site would be to the north. (See page A82.) Extension of 65th Street Within the draft of the Greater Southdale Area Planning Study, 65th Street is contemplated to be extended to connect at Xerxes Avenue. (See page A131.) The applicant has agreed to dedicate a 30-foot easement for the future roadway. This segment would not be built until all necessary right-of-way has been obtained. The property owner would still be able to utilize this area for parking and green space. Bike Parking for Residents Bike parking would be provided for each unit within the building. A total of 4,026 square feet of bike storage would be provided in the two levels of underground parking (See page A26.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 41 over story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is 6 proposing 112 over story trees, including existing and proposed. The trees would include a mixture of Oak, Hackberry, Maple Linden, Birch and Spruce. (See pages A22–A23, and the development plan book.) A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. Staff would work with Hennepin County regarding boulevard trees. Trash Enclosures The trash area is located in the first level of the parking garage inside the building. (See page A26.) Trash would be collected within the building. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached pages A114-A119. Highlighted items include: a requirement for a developer’s agreement and dedicated easements over public sidewalks and utilities. Any approvals should be conditioned on the conditions outline in the director of engineering’s memo dated February 12, 2016. Building/Building Material The building would be constructed of high quality brick and stone, pre-finished metal panels and glass. (See renderings on pages A29–A30 and A37-A41.) A materials board will be presented at the Planning Commission Meeting. Mechanical Equipment Minimal mechanical equipment has been shown on the plans. Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard (street side) of the development. Lighting A lighting plan has been submitted and conforms to all city code requirements. (See page A45.) Signage The underlying zoning of the property would be POD, therefore, would be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. Staff would recommend a full signage plan be submitted as part of the Final Development Plan. Plans should specifically include location and size of monument signs 7 and way finding signage. Specific signage regulations would be incorporated into the PUD Zoning District including way finding signage. Temporary Cell Pole Currently there are cellular antennas on top of the office building that is to be demolished. Therefore, the applicant will be required to temporarily locate a 75-foot cell pole north of the proposed new building. (See page A31.) This pole would be removed and the antennas re-located on top of the proposed new apartment building, once the new building is constructed. Comprehensive Guide Plan To accommodate the request, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested so the future land use on all corners of 66th and Xerxes/York are consistent. From RM, Regional Medical to CAC, Community Activity Center. The CAC, Community Activity Center allows up to 105 units per acre. The proposed density of 66 units per acre meets the Comprehensive Plan, but is on the higher end of existing high density residential in Edina. The site’s location on an arterial roadway provides a good location for higher density. The Comprehensive Plan suggests allowing higher density and floor area ratio subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. The proposed plans contain most of these elements. There is adequate utility capacity available; the new transit station is located across the street at Southdale; the Kimley Horn traffic study concludes there would be minimal impact to the roads, and the existing roads could support the development; underground parking is provided, there are minimal surface parking lots at ultimate buildout, the open space area is provided along the front streets and in front of the building in phase 1; affordable housing is proposed, but does not meet the housing policy - 3% of the housing units (11 total) would be designated for affordable housing; sustainable design principles are applied, and there are vast improvements in pedestrian circulation to move pedestrians around and through the site. Below are existing high density developments in the City. Note that the trend in multi-family development is higher density. This is due to the high cost of 8 land in Edina, the requirement for affordable housing, and the added cost of redeveloping a site with existing buildings: Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental (Senior Housing) 7151 York 364 63 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 6500 France (Senior Housing) 6500 France 188 80 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 Walker Elder Suites (Senior) 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative (Senior) 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven (Senior) 3400 Parklawn 100 42 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 69th & York Apartments 3121 69th Street 114 30 Lennar (The Onyx) 6725 York 240 52 71 France (Byerly’s) 71 France 234 23 Beacon (66 West) 66 France 39 43 Gateway Pointe 3101 66th St. 210 105 Millennium at Southdale (under consideration) 6550 Xerxes & 3250 66rh St. 375 66 Land Use. The map on the following page shows how the Comprehensive Plan would be amended to accommodate the change in designation. In making this change, all four corners of 66th and Xerxes/York would be designated as CAC, Community Activity Center. This area is seen as a gateway into Edina and the Southdale Area; this change in designation makes the land uses allowed on all four corners consistent. The changes are the pink added to the map. 9 10 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section 36-253 of the Edina City Code provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; 11 h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. If the site is guided “Community Activity Center – CAC,” which is described as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Primary uses include retail and residential. Mixed uses are encouraged. Having more housing in this commercial area increases the mix of uses within the district, as retail is still the predominant land use in the CAC. The site would be pedestrian friendly with pedestrian paths planned through and around the site. A boulevard style sidewalk would be provided along Xerxes and 66th Street, and on both sides of the north-south drive- aisle that will separate the two buildings from each phase. Phase 1 will include a sidewalk on the west side of the private drive to allow pedestrians from the north to walk through the site to connect to Southdale and the Metro Transit facility. The applicant is proposing to provide 11 units for affordable housing (3% of the development.) This application was submitted after the City’s Housing Policy took effect. The Policy was being considered during their sketch plan review, so the developer was aware of the likelihood of 10% affordable housing being required. Gateway Pointe will be providing 5% of their units for affordable housing, and the Policy was not in effect when that project was reviewed and approved. Staff recommends that 10% of the units, 22 in Phase 1 and 14 in Phase 2 be designated for affordable housing consistent with Edina’s Affordable Housing Policy. (See Policy on pages A120-A121.) This will assist the City in meeting its affordable housing goal of 212 units by 2020. To date the City has approved 169 units for affordable housing and 20 have been built; and another 49 are anticipated in the next 1-2 years. The building serves as a “gateway” into Edina. The curved shape of the first level of the building is unique and fits the curved shape of the lot. The primary parking area would be underneath the building. 12 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Chapter 36 shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R-1, R-2 and PRD-1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. The proposed use, multiple-family residential housing is a use allowed in the Community Activity Center, as described in the Comprehensive Plan. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; Assuming approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the site would be guided as “Community Activity Center – CAC,” which encourages the mixing of retail and multi-family residential uses. The proposed plan brings more housing to the area, which currently is a minority use in the CAC. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; This project is for a single land use, however, multi-family residential is a minority use in the district. It is a permitted use in the CAC, therefore it is consistent with the objectives of the ordinance and Comprehensive Plan. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As indicated in table earlier within this report, the proposed density is within the range allowed in this district. The site will benefit by the 13 amenities within walking distance including Southdale, Metro Transit and Fairview Hospital. The proposed density is appropriate for this site. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the underlying POD Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone this site to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and number of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. (See the preliminary PUD Ordinance on the last pages of this staff report.) Please note that a few City Standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The design of the building is of a high quality. Proposed materials include high quality brick, stone, and metal panel. (See page A40.) The development would incorporate improved landscaping and green space within the development. The site is mostly building and paved surface today. 14 COMPLIANCE TABLE * Variance or would require change to PUD ** Council may approve subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height – 2008 Comprehensive Plan City Standard POD Proposed Building Setbacks Front – 66th/York Side – East Side – West Front – North 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet 75 feet 20 feet* 11 feet* 20 feet* 90 feet* Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet 6-7 stories 74-82 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio FAR) Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. 1.9** Density 105 units per acre for CAC, Community Activity Center 66 Parking Stalls 227 enclosed residential– Phase 1 294 total office – Phase 1 145 enclosed – Phase 2 350 enclosed + 29 surface 250 surface* 249 enclosed + 11 surface Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet 15 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding Land Use reasonable to allow the proposed development? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. To the north are high density residential developments consistent with the proposal. Multi-family housing is an allowed use in the Regional Medical District. This site is seen as the gateway into Edina and the Southdale Area. The proposed land use change would allow all four corners of 66th and York/Xerxes to be consistent. 2. The proposed development is within the height and density guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use, which is predominantly residential, seems appropriate for the area. 4. The traffic and parking study done by Kimley Horn concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. • Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site for the following reasons: 1. As highlighted above on pages 10–13, the proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provides a land use with the CAC area that is in the minority; thereby creating more mixture of uses within the area. b. Create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Boulevard style sidewalks would be provided around on all roadways and a new-north south sidewalk connection 16 would be made to provide a new connection to Southdale and Metro Transit for the residents to the north on York Avenue. c. Podium Height would be used on 66th Street. d. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative, (See page A11.) including: Green roofs, 15% increase in energy efficiency; participation in the Xcel Energy EDA program; and green construction practices. e. Ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. f. Provides affordable housing. 2. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, re- guiding this site would provide consistent land use designation for all four corners of 66th and York/Xerxes, which is viewed as a gateway into Edina and the Southdale Area. 3. The existing roadways would support the project. Kimley-Horn conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. (See traffic study on pages A46–A108.) 4. The public realm provided for the development would be within and around the sidewalk areas. The proposed plans invite people through the project from the north to provide a pedestrian access to Southdale and the Metro Transit station. Boulevard style sidewalks are provided to comfortably move residents around the building and through the project to create a comfortable pedestrian experience. A large green space, adjacent to the boulevard style sidewalk is proposed to fill in the right-turn lane, another signature of this gateway area. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. 17 c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower- density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. i. Provision of affordable housing. 6. The proposal addresses many of the working principles of the Greater Southdale Area Working Group. (See pages A109-A113.) 7. The site is a gateway into Edina, and the building has taken the curved shape of the site that it sits on. Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendments Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments for 6444, 6500, 6550 and 6525 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West as follows: Re-guiding these sites from RM, Regional Medical to CAC, Community Activity Center. Approval is subject to the following findings: 18 1. The proposed land uses, multi-family residential and commercial are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. Multi-family housing is an allowed use in the Regional Medical District. 2. This site is seen as the gateway into Edina and the Southdale Area. The proposed land use change would allow all four corners of 66th and York/Xerxes to be consistent. 3. The proposed development is within the height and density guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use, which is predominantly residential, seems appropriate for the area. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD- 1&2, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and Preliminary Development Plan to redevelop 6550 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West. The proposal is a two phase development as follows: Phase 1 (3250 66th Street West): A 6-7 story, 227-unit apartment building, with two levels of underground parking, a club room and fitness area, and a green roof with an amenity terrace. Phase 2 (6650 Xerxes Avenue): A 5-6 story, 145-unit apartment building. Five and four floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as “Community Activity Center – CAC,” which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multi-family residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as amended. 19 2. The proposed land uses, multi-family residential and commercial are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. 3. The proposed development is within the height and density guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use, which is predominantly residential, seems appropriate for the area. 5. The traffic and parking study done by Kimley Horn concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. 6. The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents to the north through the development to connect to the Southdale area. 7. The site is a gateway into Edina, and the building has taken the curved shape of the site that it sits on. Podium Height would be used on 66th Street. 8. The public realm provided for in the development would be within and around the sidewalk areas. The proposed plans invite people through the project from the north to provide a pedestrian access to Southdale and the Metro Transit station. Boulevard style sidewalks are provided to comfortably move residents around the building and through the project to create a comfortable pedestrian experience. A large green space, adjacent to the boulevard style sidewalk is proposed to fill in the right-turn lane, another signature of this gateway area. 9. The development would include affordable housing. 10. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative, including: Green roofs, 15% increase in energy efficiency; participation in the Xcel Energy EDA program; and green construction practices. 11. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 20 12. The proposal addresses many of the working principles of the Greater Southdale Area Working Group as mentioned in the above findings. 13. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. i. Provision of affordable housing. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated January 22 and February 5, 2016. 2. Final plans must show all mechanical equipment and the means to screen it. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located in front of the building on a public street. 3. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 21 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. This sidewalk proposed along Xerxes must be extended to the east property boundary. The north-south sidewalk on the west side of the private drive must also be extended to York Avenue. 6. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. 7. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated February12, 2016. 8. As part of a Developer’s Agreement, the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing improvements to the 66th and York intersection which may include elimination of the right turn lane, providing green space and improving pedestrian crossings. 9. Ten percent (10%) of the housing units shall be designated for affordable housing. Specific detail would be determined at the time of final approval. 10. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. The building shall be designed to be 15% more energy efficient than the current state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 11. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. The temporary cell pole must be removed as soon as possible. No final occupancy permit will be granted for the apartment building until the pole is removed. 13. A 30-foot roadway easement shall be dedicated at the time of Final Rezoning for a future extension of 65th Street. Deadline for a city decision: May 20, 2016 ORDINANCE NO. 2016- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-10, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-10 DISTRICT AT 6550 XERXES AND 3250 66th STREET WEST The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to rezone the below described property to PUD, Planned Unit Development in accordance with the following: Sec. 36-503 Planned Unit Development District-10 (PUD-10) — Millennium at Southdale (a) Legal description: See Attached. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans received by the City on , 2016 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2016-_, on file in the Office of the Planning Division. (c) Principal Uses: All principal uses allowed in the POD, Planned Office Commercial District Retail uses allowed in the PCD-1 District Multi-Family Residential (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the POD, Planned Office District- (POD) (e) Conditional Uses: None (f) Development Standards. Development standards per the POD Zoning District, except the following: Building Setbacks 20 feet 11 feet 20 feet 90 feet Front — 66th/York Avenue Side — East Side — West Rear—North Maximum FAR 2% 1 (g) Signs shall be allowed per the POD standards in Sec. 36-1714. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon Met Council review and decision on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: s s 2 Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2016. City Clerk 3 A ..vp.r x . I i r. • Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. Print Date: 8/19/2015 r•--* 771IT-. . • 1 I n1 v••• t 1 1,, 1. '• ' k7. . .:,, n••1 ;,,•n i„ 7, :-.; . .;: ;7.„. 1 „3,.. • 'V.!: :I `• ••••••,1 'It: , x -01 . t - .-D •,t ;:••••1I Tr.0 it• 1: • .Ini :;rurft 0 Park I 'Jill t•TF.11.1 WT I I I u - Ci Iii 51P.5,11 V5.1-11T This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT@ HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 711ifil:.Green! Pamela Park : ' • Wf • I ill El 1••.C.1 *-4 • .1 2 Z Lt. lArE H FIWAY ; • -/ S. 13, Property Type: Home- stead: Commercial-Non Preferred Non-Homestead Parcel 29-028-24-24-0005 ID: Owner 3250 West 66Th Street LIG Name: Parcel 3250 66Th St W Address: Edina, MN 55435 Parcel 2.46 acres Area: 107,352 sq ft I ill f•li, I II 715,12'2,1r:1-.1j. - • IllAZ.1:110111••••.1AN A-T-B: Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: • _Iraq 1,01 LAM • . 1. Property Map 11•444TEI ±.1 90 ITT L r• rir--,,"!tl, 1,n 1/1,414 3,-;,3r1 t 1::=- ILlinkiiik I , .111 ti3o; 4-4 1-43,1 A II STREET WI-S Ti - _ • - r ri - ( 11,,c L5,525;,;,i • :,•3R9 _G•R'41 oz..; - A., • Prog• rz,-1uL a-lager-136' it,E7r14Arir 'ffiqti..0 1 ' ri•-. if-i&A I , -F---- P,P, ‘,...„,..,-. 1.."11,171 • • = .6.2.3A1 6_ - or ; im4 05170.Ver,„4„tall CAI 6442.1: matio, rimpeo If' ' -' • ' :,-__ __„. . .7___ , _ _ 0 ' -17- - _. ;._:::0•:.‘.1'," _ se'. 1, ' :`•-• - 7: {=7„.11i 1 •,,,,..11 _::, , 1 0 Lr . . :.-, : i :4- r*. :1' if-5 2410 ,„,, •••---rf ' ,. ' - , - I .-7 •• F - LI • .'111 I fr"-.A17.; i[t-Zalrit411' 9 11:-L.- 736.-2A'*. ka* • aria- kikLi_ fid4L = a4;arwir.jLl n ••!;_j '7--11 e-T-oom 17-11 r wr- y • - • .(7.71.r •az. • 411 - ; rt 94A ,67;2-5 WI PiT2i - ' (-.711,13 g ;in t ;70.9 1..\\.. • s CO 17 •-c lir - • 1 I- I 3425 „ -506TlfDAtE CENTER -a.24:// ' -n • 41..? •,/ Map Scale: 1" 400 ft. Print Date: 8/19/2015 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or Implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT @ HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 A min kGreent Parcel 29-028-24-24-0005 ID: Owner 3250 West 66Th Street Lic Name: Parcel 3250 66Th St W Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Commercial-Non Preferred Type: Home- Non-Homestead stead: Parcel 2.46 acres Area: 107,352 sq ft A-T-B: Abstract Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: I - r 7,L0'4,•;-• pa Au ; \C " 4_14). we.*.er• F;k1s •lk • \lit c, .;4r* • r;) .„ !ff 6445 1":•",4 • 1Ir . • ; i•,.,•,c-,2;'Ci 9t I — • 1••••' • • • 4 -t_ , 11 f#,;i1Vr;6 • rli2rp ,tit/t I )(I :L f.:c1 • .14 ,.......,, .1-• m i -,--- r ' i e. -T, • • , I : ..„ - ....I•vale....1116:=13C0-.7% ," , ., , . 1 .,...." :1----.1-**-- • - --"'""''-7.5.7.- ' 4 ' ' I r:.1-1,,,itaia-i '1-!-- . _- _ _-•""'Nen :!1a...,- , e •;,./. . . 6....,,,,,„ tIvii.,1. • 6 h , 1..4116 il ,. _ . 1.1 30-f5. . 4, ,.':•••• -. ./1 ILI, il ,, 51'01, • '''' . . ih'i .1 1 i , k [0., ti , i • 4, •,.. ., i , .A, Az . 1.;.•,,.. Jr- rint___rit -L_I 3425 _ : Parcel 29-028-24-24-0005 ID: Owner Name: 3250 West 66Th Street LIc I c,s IttlF I (0 fr VI CO en V 014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, Including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 2.46 acres Area: 107,352 sq It Parcel 3250 66Th St W Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Commercial-Non Preferred Type: Home- Non-Homestead stead: A-T-B: Market Total: Tax Total: Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: COPYRIGHT@ HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 Mini-Green! Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. Print Date: 8/19/201-5 === A _ A- 3 Ls It et t aP o lo n t la l_ A OC . r ra d D a le : 39Ih SI Legend: Potential Areas of Change 1- North France Avenue 2- Neighborhood Contrrerdal Nodes 3- Corrrrunity Cortrrercial Nodes 4 - South dale Area 5- CornierciaU0ffice C011icIDTS (..,for living, learning, raising families & doing business 0 yi 2008 Comprehensive Plan-;) Fiume 4.4 City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Date of Aerial Photography; August 2006 Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design Conceptual Land Use Framework: Potential Areas of Change e o 0.5 Miles 4-33 Legend LDR - Low Oens4 Re tlamb21 OR-OR,. W011E-rad =I IN *WOW tlecfcat LDAR-LoRDEmittAlchedRethlollbl 0- Ofice EM1 OSP • °mein. so/ PoEE HER - elfurnOendtf ReEkluitlaI UXC- lifted Me Nola, I PEP • PublUSErri-Putat L---1 Kph Danslf 1 CAC • CoorrunlyAcErly w I I LAU. LlnitEdAccE Es HiOwnif NM EOIME 'Food Curn.ohl I- In<USell 12 CA(.2' WOE!!, SI 10 / 2 5/ 2 00 7 2:13 : 59 P Height Limits 2 Stories: 24' 3 Stories: 36' 4 Stories: 48' 5 Stories: 60' 8 Stories: 96' 9 Stories: 108' 10 Stories: 120' 12 Stories: 144' _El Standard Height I Podium Height ,C) rn i (.1 f. o n IMO 00 Dr City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Future Land Use Plan with Building Heights Southeast Quadrant Figure 4.6B 49. Data Source: URS 0.5 Miles FULLER ST - • foi VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE DE1 • .J Lake 70TH & FRANCE DETAIL VV TOTH ST 56k January 21, 2016 t I'll:till • I' 'I" 11: 1: !4.."441.1% 1111.11 Residential Redevelopment at MILLENNIUM at SOUTH DALE Formerly 66th & YORK Edina, MN 55435 Project Narrative Developer: Prepared by: DLC Residential, LLC 21500 Biscayne Blvd. Aventura, FL 33180 Local Office: 5245 Wayzata Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Rich Kauffman, 612.325.9767 Elness Swenson Graham Architects (ESG) Dennis Sutliff, AIA, AICP 612.373.4624 Kim ley-Horn Luke Payne, PE 507.216.6210 Nek) A. DEVELOPER Since 2004, DLC Residential has been developing and constructing income properties in the strongest emerging markets across the United States with over 4,000 completed units. DLC consistently focuses on integrity, creative design and architecture, collaboratively working with local municipalities and careful market research, resulting in highly desirable, luxury residential communities. B. REQUESTED ACTIONS • Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Regional Medical to Community Activity Center for five parcels; Parcel 1 at 6550 York Avenue South, Parcel 2 at 3250 West 66th Street, Parcel 3 with no assigned address, Parcel 8 at 6444 Xerxes Avenue South and Parcel 9 at 6500 Xerxes Avenue South. • Rezoning from POD-3 to PUD for Parcel 1, 2 and 3. • Preliminary Development Plan Approval for Phase I only on Parcels 2 and 3. The development applications for Millennium at Southdale follow the following proposed approval schedule: Residential Redevelopment Plan will • Introductory Meeting with City Staff August 4, 2015 Completed • Sketch Plan Review; Planning Commission August 26, 2015 completed • Sketch Plan Review; City Council September 1, 2015 Completed • Kick-Off Meeting with City Staff November 19, 2015 Completed • Additional staff meeting December 8, 2015 Completed • Neighborhood Meeting January 5, 2016 Completed • Additional staff meeting January 11, 2016 Completed • Formal Applications submitted January 21, 2016 • Planning Commission Public Hearing February 24, 2016 • City Council Public Hearing March 15, 2016 • Met Council review (Guide Plan Amendment) TBD Included in this submittal are the following: • Cover Letter from DLC Residential, LLC. • Project Narrative. • Response to Working Principles. • Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment Application. • Rezoning Permit Application. • Preliminary Development Plan Application. • Large scale (30" x 42") drawing sets. • Small scale (11" x 17") drawing sets. • Digital CD of all documents. • Checks for application fees totaling $2,450.00. C. PROJECT LOCATION The project site lies in the north-west quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and West 66th Street. As such, it is a "Gateway Site" to the France Avenue, Southdale Area. It is designed to respond to the Working Principles that have been put forward as goals for all future developments for that area. 66th & York Page 2 January 21, 2016 D. PROPERTY The project site is currently platted as three parcels totaling 264,250 square feet or 5.65 acres. Parcels 8, (15,111 square feet, 0.35 acres) and Parcel 9 (17,094 square feet, 0.39 acres) are to be re- guided only. E. SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT Millennium at Southdale, the proposed residential redevelopment at 66th & York will be accomplished in two Phases. Phase I will occur on Parcel 2 and 3 and will consist of a 227 unit, rental apartment building with two levels of underground parking. The existing Titus Building will remain in place on Parcel 1 until Phase ll is begun. Phase ll will include the demolition of the Titus Building and the construction of a second rental apartment building containing 145 units with two levels of underground parking. Phase II will complete the composition of two buildings on the combined sites. In doing so, it will transform the current auto-centric office development characterized by surface parking lots into one, fully integrated site with well-defined open spaces, pedestrian features and on site amenities. The majority of the apartment units will be one, one-plus and two bedrooms. There will be a small number of Studio/Alcove apartments and a small number of three bedroom apartments. DLC Residential is proposing to include 7 units (3%) at 60% AMI for Phase I and 4 units (3%) at 60% AMI for Phase II. The reduced rents will cost the developer approximately $1.4 million. Two levels of underground parking will be reserved for the residents. Surface parking will serve their guests. The preliminary metrics for this development, broken out by phase, are contained in the table at the end of this narrative and on Sheet A0.0a. City staff has requested a 30 foot wide easement at the north side of the property to accommodate the possibility of a future continuation of 65th Street. DLC Residential's agreement to consider granting this right-of-way easement has been and will continue to be conditioned on the agreement that the City will not disturb any access or parking in that dedication area until such time as the "Titus" property is redeveloped. That agreement will need to be properly' documented in the Developer Agreement. F. VISION AND PUBLIC PURPOSE DLC Residential is proposing to produce exactly the kind of vital, transformative and precedent- setting, redevelopment at the corner of 66' and York that is envisioned by City's Working Principles for the France Avenue, Southdale Area District. Their vision for Millennium at Southdale is to begin the transformation of this site by bringing 24/7 life and vitality to what is currently an 8 to 5, auto- centric, single use, office environment. Millennium at Southdale will contribute to the City's goal of improving the pedestrian environment and public realm within the district in a manner which can be emulated by other redevelopments in the future. It will provide new options for the emerging residential markets and 21st century lifestyles that are needed by Edina to remain an attractive home for the community's next generation. It will create a one-of-a-kind, luxury residential community that is in short supply today. This redevelopment will address the objectives of the France Avenue, Southdale Area District and benefit the residents and visitors of Edina, adjacent property owners and tenants in the following ways: • Land Use. Edina's policy-makers have delivered a strong message. They believe this redevelopment project should be a "precedent setter" in the Southdale District. It should be representative of the means by which this entire district can be redeveloped as a new, 66th & York Page 3 January 21, 2016 walkable neighborhood of higher density uses, high quality architecture and attractive pedestrian spaces. • Icon Architecture. Positioned at the intersection that serves as the northeast entry to the Southdale District, Millennium at Southdale is clearly a "foreground" site. This redevelopment will be viewed from street level by tens of thousands of cars passing each day and night. It is also prominently situated of the north end of the York Avenue street corridor. In response, the south façade of this new development - both high and low - is designed as a visual anchor to this prominent corner. The design places the public spaces behind transparent walls and a lighted landscape to enliven the pedestrian/vehicle level and it creates a dramatic, lighted beacon or lantern that will act as the visual terminus to this urban vista, seen from a long distance away. • Artful Building Design. Beyond the very prominent south and east exposures, the design of the improvements on this site demands a presence and creativity that is commensurate with its prominent position in the District. While the buildings must function efficiently, they will fulfill their role as foreground buildings with creatively sculpted profiles and massing and with high quality materials. The primary street frontages are animated by spaces containing human activity. The massing above the ground plane is sculpted with steps and a variety of exterior materials that relate closely to the enhanced public sidewalks and crosswalks. Linear elements of the building facades are punctuated with projecting masses that alternate back and forth across the landscaped interior courtyards and streetscape. • Inviting Public Realm. A creative approach to shaping the spaces between buildings is a key element of successful residential communities. This is especially true in Millennium at Southdale which cannot currently be characterized as "pedestrian-friendly." When complete, Millennium at Southdale will host a variety of outdoor rooms and spaces. The very busy and energetic York Avenue street front capped by activity spaces at each end will be defined by 3- dimensional pedestrian improvements along its length. This will create a pedestrian friendliness that does not exist today and will define the site's outer edge. It will also help to calm the interior of the site. Once inside, residents and guests will experience no fewer than five distinct outdoor spaces — including the paver-rich, parking court and pedestrian street. These outdoor spaces are sculpted by the building masses, each with its own unique scale and character. The interior street with its parallel parking, benches and pedestrian-scaled light fixtures will create calm and inviting central spine with a true residential character. • Live-able Precincts. Millennium at Southdale will provide a concrete example of how the France Avenue, Southdale Area District can be redeveloped into a more walkable, pedestrian friendly and interconnected neighborhood with greater levels of the live-work amenities which our emerging, 21st century lifestyles are demanding. It will be transformative to this portion of the District. The current auto-oriented land use dominated by surface parking will become a greened oasis with the automobiles relegated to underground status. Only the bare minimum of guest parking will remain on the surface. G. MARKET POSITION DLC Residential is proposing 375 apartment units in two phases. 227 apartments are to be included in Phase I. This new community will be positioned at the upper end of the rental market, complete with high-end interior finishes, 10 foot ceilings and extensive indoor and outdoor amenities. The majority of the apartments will be one and two bedroom homes but approximately 15 to 20% will have additional alcove, den or other "bonus" rooms. Approximately 10% of the units will be smaller, studio or alcove style apartments. And approximately 5% will be larger, three bedroom units. Residents of Millennium at Southdale will enjoy amenities and conveniences commensurate with upper end rentals. As is true in other communities developed by DLC Residential, residents will have 66th & York Page 4 January 21, 2016 AJA large windows, generous balconies and open well-appointed kitchens. Those in some upper level units will enjoy larger, walk-out terraces, some wrapping the corners of their apartments. Residential amenities will include heated and secure parking, outdoor courtyards with pools and spas, terraces furnished with grills, lounge areas, and a fire pit. Indoor club rooms, a fitness center and yoga facilities will be available for socializing with other residents, for parties with family and friends or for quiet, individual use. On-site professional management will be provided to all residents and their guests. H. LANDSCAPING/STREETSCAPING The landscape and streetscape improvements for this site will establish a visually compelling outdoor environment, rich in pedestrian amenities and rendered with high quality materials. Particular attention is paid the interior street that extends north-south through the site and to the 66th Street frontage. These two elements are designed to directly respond to the Working Principles by promoting connectivity with the adjacent neighborhoods. They will provide an attractive and welcoming environment, safe for both pedestrians and bicyclers. These public streets and street frontages will employ traditional planting materials, varied pedestrian and auto paving materials, pedestrian scaled lighting and site furniture appropriate to the new residential use. In addition to these public spaces, the private courtyards provide outdoor activity areas for residents. The Sunset Terrace holds a swimming pool, spa, fire pit and bar-b-ques for active socializing. The Sunrise Terrace is a passive space with more greenery and benches and a dog walk. PARKING In total, this redevelopment proposes to provide 575 reserved, enclosed and secure parking stalls in its two underground garages; xxx of which will be included in Phase I. This equates to one parking space for each bedroom within the development plus 52 extra stalls which may be reserved for residents who wish to have addition parking available. Thirty eight surface parking spaces in the landscaped auto court and parallel spaces on the internal street will serve the residents' guests and visitors to the leasing office. All but the parallel stalls along the east side of the internal street will be included in Phase I. Phase I will also include a temporary surface parking lot of 72 cars to accommodate tenants in the Titus office building until such time as it is no longer needed. J. SITE CIRCULATION and TRAFFIC Access to the site occurs at three existing locations, a right in-right out movement at mid-block at the York/66th confluence, at the existing York Avenue driveway on the north, and by way of a cross- access agreement through the parking lot on the property to the west. That same agreement results in the need for a driveway over Parcels 2 and 3 allowing access to/from the adjacent site to the west. The new, internal street which runs north-south between Phase I and II is conceived to be private to this community and pedestrian-friendly in its design. While it will provide a through-route for emergency vehicles and an alternate route for residents, it is designed to discourage cut-through traffic to the residential neighborhood to the north. It will be narrow, incorporating traffic calming measures and be finished with materials suited for the residential use and accommodating to pedestrian circulation for residents and neighbors to the north. c't) cc \\-• 66th & York Page 5 January 21, 2016 /1to As part of its goal of promoting enhanced connectivity to the neighborhood to encourage reductions in auto traffic, this development will be extremely bicycle friendly. In addition to enhancing the pedestrian sidewalk on its street frontage to accommodate both bikes and walkers, DLC will provide two large bicycle storage rooms for residents, conveniently located near the two elevator banks in the underground garage. Further, staff has requested that DLC share responsibility with the City for closing the free-right turn lane from York Avenue to 66' Street. While the exact geometry of this change to the intersection is not yet known, DLC enthusiastically embraces this goal. This action will allow for greater enhancement of the pedestrian environment along York Avenue and 66th Street and for improved pedestrian safety at the 66th Street crosswalk. And as stated in Section E, staff has requested a 30 foot wide easement at the north side of the property to accommodate a future extension of 65th Street. K. STORMWATER This redevelopment lies in and will be permitted by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. It will be reviewed and permitted by the Nine-Mile Creek District. As such, stormwater management facilities are designed to comply with their requirements for rate control and water quality. This site will incorporate a cellular, underground storm water vault system in the auto-court at the south, the low end of the site. The inlet, and a visual clue to this sustainable and common sense storm water solution will be expressed in the landscaped area of the auto court. L. SUSTAINABILITY Recognizing the sustainability is critical to our future economic vitality and quality of life, our development team is committed to promoting stewardship for our environment and resources at all stages of the work. From broad urban design goals of creating livable communities through creative use of density, reduced dependency on automobiles and promoting walkability, to the use of green building practices and highly efficient building systems and equipment with reduced life-cycle costs and longer life spans that enhance occupant health and wellbeing. At Millennium at Southdale, this commitment will translate to; • A compact site design offering numerous green spaces, high quality pedestrian and bicycle amenities plus improved walkability and connection to transit. • Greening of some rooftop areas over the garage and some roofs. This will assist in collecting storm water as well as provide attractive gathering spaces with shade plants to combat the urban heat island effect. • On-site storm water collection, management and treatment system that will be evident at the "infiltration garden" in the public forecourt to the buildings. • Utilization of green design principles and material specifications including locally sourced, high- performance structural, window and exterior envelope systems with recycled content. • Compliance with the new, 2015 Minnesota Commercial Energy Code (references the 2012 IECC) which represents approximately a 15% increase in energy efficiency over the previous code. • Participation in the Xcel Energy EDA (Energy Design Assistance) program to assist in selecting materials and systems with low energy consumption characteristics yet high life-cycle value. • Green construction phase practices including construction waste management and recycling. 4),c 66th & York Page 6 )January 21, 2016 Act( N. SITE DATA PHASE I PHASE II Parcel 1 2.58 ac. 112,574 sf TOTAL Site Area Parcels 2 and 3 3.07 ac. 133,676 sf 5.65 ac. 246,250 sf New Residential Development Building Area 255,008 gsf Residential FAR 1.91 Number of Units 227 Number of Bedrooms 338 Residential Density (Units/acre) 73.9 166,260 1.48 148 210 57.4 421,268 sf 1.71 375 548 66.4 Building Height 6/5 floors over parking 5/4 floors over parking Steps at 3, 4 and 5 Steps at 3 and 4 72 feet 61 feet Surface Parking, Residential 38 cars 11 cars 49 cars Secure Parking 353 cars 249 cars 602 cars Total Residential Parking 391 cars 260 cars 651 cars Parking Ratio 1/bedroom +53 1/bedroom +50 1/bedroom + 103 Existing Office Building Building Area 62,079 sf na. na. Surface Parking-Parcel 1 150 cars na. na. Surface Parking-Parcel 3 72 cars Secure Parking 28 cars (est.) Total parking 250 cars Parking Ratio 4.03 cars/1,000 sf na. na. Parking on Parcel 3 dedicated to 3316 66th St. 20 of 72 cars 20 cars 20 cars 66th & York Page 7 January 21, 2016 41?-- elness swenson graham architects inc. esc February 3, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director FROM: Dennis Sutliff ESG Architects, Inc RE: Millennium at Southdale (Formerly 66th & York) List of Changes Since August 2105 when 66th & YORK was submitted to the City of Edina for review by the Planning Commission and City Council, the Architectural plans have been developed to a significantly higher level of detail. In addition to Architectural exhibits, Civil Engineering Plans and Landscape Plans are now included. But the overall site organization, the building height, massing, setbacks and density remain largely the unchanged. The number of dwelling units and the parking counts have changed only slightly. With a few exceptions, most of the changes to these items can be characterized as refinements. The most significant changes that have been made since the August Sketch Plan submittal are the result of specific requests or comments by City policy makers and staff. In summary, those requests were; • Preserve the option to extend 65th Street across the northerly 30 feet of the site. • Enhance the pedestrian and bicycle environments, making them safer, better connected to other destinations in the District and more attractive to residents and neighbors. • Create an iconic redevelopment whose building and site features are commensurate with its position as a "foreground" site within the district. With these goals in mind, the significant changes that have been included in the new submittal plans dated 1/20/2106 are; 1. Parcels 8 and 9 are now include in the Application for Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment. 2. While the south setbacks have been maintained as previously shown, the upper levels of Phase I and all of Phase ll are moved southwards to free up land on the north end of the site for possible extension of 65th Street. The Phase I, underground parking footprint has been shortened so it no longer extends under the requested future ROW. 3. The floor elevations of the buildings have been lowered about 6 feet. In Phase I, this means that both levels of the parking garage are deeper into the ground. As a result, the terraces 500 washington avenue south • suite 1080 • minneapolis, mn 55415 • p: 612.339.5508 • f: 612.339.5382 • www.esgarchitects.com an equal opportunity employer Millennium at Southdale List of Changes November 3, 2016 Page 2 of 2 built over the parking have a much better relationship to elevations of the adjacent land and relate much more closely to the internal pedestrian street. 4. As a result of item 2 above, the residential amenities that were previously located on the upper level of the garage are moved up to the first floor where they now have a direct relationship to the street level lobby, the guest parking and to 66th Street. The dwelling units previously located on first floor of the south end of the Phase I building are relocated to the fifth floor, thereby adding strength and prominence to the south façade of Phase I on 66th Street. 5. The character of internal street; the southward extension of York Avenue, is enhanced with upgraded paving materials, pedestrian scaled lighting and stoops, stairs and benches so it will function as an attractive north-south pedestrian link between the residential neighborhood to the north and the Southdale District on the south. While it must accommodate emergency vehicles, its design is intended to discourage through traffic. 6. This redevelopment addresses the City's and the County's wishes to close the free-right turn lane at the 66th & York intersection. While the geometry of this roadway change has not been finalized, this proposal calls for added enhancements to pedestrian environment at that corner and along the entire south-east street frontage. 7. The south elevation of the Phase I building has been modified to further emphasize its position as a gateway to this District. The five-story wing has been moved forward to increase its visibility along 66th Street. The one story base has been increased in height to a story-and-a half with added sun-screens and pedestrian features. And the height of the six- story portion has been increased and exaggerated by the addition of a tall, illuminated parapet that will anchor the northward view of the York Avenue street corridor. This parapet will also conceal the roof-mounted cell phone towers that will be installed on its roof. 8. Phase I metrics have been refined as follows; • Dwelling unit count in Phase I has been reduced from 230 apartments to 227 but the number of bedrooms has increased from 320 to 338. • The gross area of Phase I has increased from 243,800 square feet to 255,008 square feet. • Phase I residential parking has increased from 379 cars to 391. 353 parking spaces are enclosed and secure for residents. 38 spaces are on the surface and can be used by visitors and guests. Cc; Rick Kauffman Russ Krivor Pedro Fullana Luke Payne Ryan Phipps Wes Beehler 3250 West 66th Street Edina, MN 55435 SYMBOLS LEGEND '0n13=17 NOM-- -- 0 - - 100146,411,1••• UNIT MIX St SQUARE FOOTAGES PARKING SCHEDULE - PHASE 1 UNITS BY LEVEL BVP,3 I Count Name I Coo. 'WA EV-SURFACE PARALLELPHISE 1 IMMA ANA_SUREACEPHASE 1 1 BR 23H 10 10 041,111.- STANDARD.SURFACE_EHASE 1 LEVEL I 106 333 Alcove ISI CCNIPACT 560, le.- STANDARD 155 LEVEL PI 104 1 BR 1 BR OEN 15 4410, 1E...COMPACT 06-Mo 111'. COMPACT BR 3 BR 15 040.0 Ia.-AEA lel - STANDARD 174 Alcove LEVEL2 LHVEL P2 105 0004 15151 .1 1 BR 1 SORER 15 B51 15 USE BY LEVEL USE BY LEVEL I GSF j 05 OF AREA 3BR Alcove LEVEL5 1 BR 90 16 NM SF 1% PARMNO 110.1155F OVA STORAGE ,1,705 SF 1 OR DEN 2 BR 16 02051. 72 123.513 SF 7,345 SF 3 OR Alcovo Va. 4 1 BR 40 13 PARKING 01.554 SF 57% STORAGE 2,145SF LEVEL P1 70E05 OF AMENITY 5,01.0 SF 13% 1 BR OEN 2 BR 15 3 BR 0.0003 GOMMON MIRGULAMON 11,053SE 29% RESIDENT-AL UNO. 2.0.75) SF 03% LEVELS 40 LEVEL 1 45.1700 SF OB4 SF 1 8A 1 BR DEN 10 COMMON / CIRGULAI1ON 7,145 SF 1056 RESIDENTIAL UNIT 37,266 5F 33% 2 BR Alceve 13 LEVEL2 45.25 SF LEVELS 35 40101 227 COMMON/ CIRCULATION 10,247 SF 114% RESIDENTIAL UNIT 137057 SF 100% LEVEL 3 1.1,T5 SF COMMON / GIRCUUTION 16,20 SE 114% FIESIOENTIALUNIT 137.003 SF 150% LEVEL.. 43.210 SF UNIT TOTALS 'COMMON CIRCUUTION 10.247 SF 11514 'RESIDE.. UNIT 135.675 SF 105% 11t11 S 1.111 . 0. LEVEL 5 410125 5F AMENITY 000 SF 1 BR 02 02 1 BR DEN 10 COMM IEISCULAI4OS BOOB SF 10% RESIDENTIAL UNIT 30,33 SF 2BR 3 OR A13300 14 100 ais LEVEL° 30,621 SF 0012 1511 40.005 SF 0121114151 227 305 PROJECT LOCATION Vicinity Site Location PROJECT TEAM 0wn0.31010100 NEC C44E411U1. LLC controdor SIMS Womela Blvd SI. Loolo Poxlv, MN 50415 ATTN: Plch WANImon ME 612.65-3507 &ha= EMINGSVAntonGEONam Archttoole 140. VIl?:tIV011rfArNAg1r1.5"51"0 012.1.16-6500 612-300.6502 040II1E1004E051 Kholomllem end ANIONNell 3=So313 efooMMV Pate., MN 65004 5074124.7011.7 .3NIATIEN goal m MEYER BOAGMAN JOHNSON 110 14211341. Avom SOLOS, SLOB NO MIrm0000lie. MN 66402 PENN: (012) 556-0717 Fm: 1012)357.5525 5150.135,1001-015.1550L [021115.11050.5215552: 11551.001 MF.5510051 E1501B25,1 hillimlaksLE.05525E SHEET INDEX i; — 1 1 1 SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME S. undo. um MM1014 rm MN MAI I CIVII • I 1-0,01.0,100000.1 103•1 I • [31,1 CI 130,,,,N001110011,31•13.1 I . 11•n•n,,,c0•1•3, 1,,,,Bui Baty 11n0n0,310,331,1,i 11•0111 1•11. . . ,3 ,,,,,,,,,,•, , 0411011010,•43•41,00•1,1•01 PIM . . 13.I. 0.1,,1 31.01,,,,,00,,,,BN•31 i•••n•n••n I 31•10.13,11,1•Iimi I • • CO. ,,,, • • 1.•110140,1- " "="11I ',:n1,.. • ANNorrclrowo ANN IN ue 1 Amm Imi,11 0,0•0430,15,,141111, I •• . A. . A. 04,, vi vi : n ALAN...1.1 ii.17-1,011, PI OWN 3100 ViiWN-101Awi • o0 • V • Am. /11,11111013131.01111,6414,131n11 11w : AA., ELAm ALm •,3,„ A .3. ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,, 11,,,,nanI•1001 • • Am. Amu 301311,LAN 1,11u6,1011. V13,00.010,0 • 431. 1 NI,01•03•1,0,1•.,,mai I 5300 ,0, B35,,.0300 113110011n••111.31 1011111N0•1011014n • • .••,,, cm... .0V'• YINAINNIAAE 0111 NANA • . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT POP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 00153. MIR, REVI•10•111 ONNINwo OH. 715631 ESC AI Men 5 0 El .41 002 TINIAN T ITLE SHUT Ti .1 Millennium at Southdale Millennium at Southdale OLC 2-l6.7 I I AREA SUMMARY SITE AREA (PHASE 1) PROPOSE° IMPERVIOUS PHASE TI PROPOSED PERVIOUS PHASE) PROPOSED PERCENT IMPERVIOUS (PHASE 1) °INDS OF DISTURBANCE (PHASE 1) 133,67“F 07.046 SF 35,030 SF 73Y. 3.70 oc CD , DER 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROS. CONTROL mENBURES.INOLUDINO THE REMOVAL OF SI, IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES [TURING THE DURATION OF ME CONSTRUcTioN. 14. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. IS REmOvAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLL9XED. IS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AU. SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND RAVED AREAS 'aL191TAIGRODRUFHAtCAPV VA% IrR°17,1TA SR TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AR.S. la, SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REOUIREMENTS. TO. PLAGE EROSION coNTRAL slANKET °NALL DISTURBED OR ORADED SLOPES .CEEDING 4H.1V. INAINTENANC El ALL MENsURES STATE0 ON THIS ELAN SHALL az MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMELETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THERM M.sURES sHALL BE CHECKED BY A OUNIJFIED PERSON IN ACCORDANCE virrm 7HE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR THE APPLIGI3LE nizonrr, VINICMEVEA IS MORE STRINGENT.AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ME FOLLOWING: F. INLET PROTECTION OEVICESAND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPIACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS Of UND.MINBIG OR DETERIORATION. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STANO IS MAINTAINED, AR.S PERTILIEED.WATFAED. AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. SILT FENCES SHALL LIE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDMONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCE WHEN TT R.CHES ONE.THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. THE CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREN.TTRACNING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIOHTS.0 AWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSINO OP THE CONSTRUCTION EXITSAS CONDITIONS DEMAND. .7.17 PHASE 1 PLAN SET No. Deumslon Dan, i s 160750E02 Eli RAP MILLENNIUM AT SOIFIRDALE EROSION CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 RECONSTRUCTION C2.1 g,T1,70EV EROSION LEGEND n=.= 0 SWPPP INFORMATION SION - o NO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SIGN e INLET PROTECTION WISICO INLET PROTECTION — 8 FILTRE010 SEDIMENT CONTROL - 0 CONSTRUCTION FENCE 0 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EXIT —SSE — TEMPORARY SILT F.CE SOIL TYPE: URBAN LANEASDIPSAMMENTS (CUT AND FILL UND) COMPLEX. 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES SITE LEGEND - — PROPERTY LINE ..n •••,44-wIn PROPOSED PHASE 'LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Im...54mom EXISTING DRAINAGE EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR - - - =STING MINOR CONTOUR .710 FLOWISLOPE ARROW COSTING sToRm sEwER 0 SOIMRNO STORM SEWER MANHOLE ITS EXISTING CURB INLET EXISTINA GRATE INLET MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH DALE MOMENT KM STREIT EDINA. MN 55535 DLC '. Kinniermorn esc einem iftn3On 90.19281.3 SOO washington avenue south ;ATP! 3"1"9n 11 LS12.339.5382 www.8398rCh.Com 40 GRAPHIC WALL IN f127 .rn4 113. BO Brd=1,EV DRAINAGE AREA /T3 BOAC , DRAINar ST YE ST 66 T H ST R E E T EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES T. THE sTORMWATER pOLumioN pREvENDON PLAN IS COMPRISED OF DRAW INNS. THE STANCARD DETAILS. THE SWPPP, PLUS THE GENERAL PERMIT, ANON, SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ImPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICESAS REQUIRED HY ME SWPPP.ADDRIONAL BEST MANACEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED SY CONDITIONS NT NO NODITIONAL COST OF OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NINNIES CLEARINO TO THE MAXIMUM .TENTPRACTIGL °RAS REQUIRED BY nle OMER. PERMrr. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHO,..1. DENOTE ON PLAN THE CONCRETE WASH WATER LOCATIONS. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CL.NING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED ACCOROING TO THE GENERAL PERMIT. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL SE MAINTAINED ON SITE AR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN CLEAN.UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEANS. T. - , % SWIM DN.. 7 LI; gregium.,", ALERT TO SUBCONTRACTOR: I. THE PRESENCE 0,ROUNDwNTER SHOULD BE AtMICIPATED ON MIS PROJECT. SUBCONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS LISUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET MATHER. PROVIDE ADEOUNTE DEWATFAING. DRAINAGE AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. ';',14i.EUMATTAS. Z4 2A:rag= ETTROTNr I7,r4EC EL CT DOCUMENTS. ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 1 GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1400-232-1100 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY ARCA 651464-6002 , SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE NOTE:UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS TRAILER. PARKING, LAY DOWN. PORTA.POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT MASON'S AREA, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE AREASICONTAINERS. SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC...MEDIA/ELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANOES IN LOCATION NS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. IN ADDITION, NOTE ALL AREAS WHERE FILL LS IMPORTED FROM OR SOIL LS EXPORTED TO ON THE MTE MAPS. NOTE, DOWN SLOPE PROTECTIVE M.SURES MUST ALWAYS BE IN PLACE BEFORE SOIL IS DISTURBED. ACTNITIES ARE PRESENT IN THE ORDER OR SEQUENCE 1NHICH THEN,. REQUIRED To SE COMPLETED. PHASE 1. 1. INsTALL THE MNPPP INFORMATION SIGN AND POST REOUIRED OocuM.TS N.R THE PUNNED CONSTRUCTION I,ET, AND WITHIN EASY ACCESS TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC WITHOUT ENTERIND THE SITE. A. STAKEFIAO THE LAO (WHERE STAKING IS NOT POSSIBLEIPPACTICAL, THE L013 MUST BE CONSPICUOUSLY, AND PROMINENTLY, MARKED TO DENOTE THE BOUNDARYy. LCD MUST REMAIN CoNSPICUOUSLY MARKED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUEITON PROJECT A. INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL RAPS IN THE VICINITY OF, AND DOWN GRADIENT FROM. THE LOCATION OF THE pLANNED CONSTRUCTION EXTr. CONSTRUCTION OFFICE TRAILER, ANTI TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREAS. CLEAR ON, THE MINIMUM AR. ASSoLUTELY NECESSARY To INSTALL THESE PERIMETER CONTROL BOPS 4, INSTALL STABS.° CONSTRUCTION .IT(S) WITH SEDIMENT TRAPS. AND SET THE PROJECT OFFICE TRAILER. S. INSTALL REMAINING PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS. AS SHOWN ON THE SITE MAPS. MEAN ONLY THE MINIMUM AREA NECESSARY TO INSTALL PERIMETFA CONMOL LIMPS. n O. PREPARE TEMPT3PAIN PARKINO AND STORAGE AREA, P.SE z 1. BEGIN CLEARING, GRUBBING. AND STRIPPING THE SITE (PHARE CLEARING, AND °RUBBING TO THE EXTENT PRACTIUL TO MINIMIEE THE AMOUNT OF AREA DISTURBED ATANY POINT 'RIME) 2. BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. S. START CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINO PAD AND STRUCTURES. 4. TEMPORARILY STABILIZE. THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE MOST RECENT LAND SISTURSING/ORADING ACTIVITY, ANY DIMMED AR.S. INCLUDING MIATEATAL STOEXPILES THAT ARE SCHEDULED OR LIKELY TO REMAIN INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR 1.104E. 5. INIMEOUTE, PERMANENTLY MOIL. AREAS TOED VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE. O. INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STOMA SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. T. INSTALL NIP FUR AROUND OUTLET STRUCTURES AS .CH OUTLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED. a. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES AS .CH INLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED. I, 9. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING. I 10. PAVE SEM. 11. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES, PER SMP OETAILS. 12 COMMETE GRADING AND INSTALLARON OF PERMANENT STABILMADON OVER ALL AREAS. INCLUDING I OUT LOTS AND PONDS. 13. OBTAIN CONCURRENCE FROM THE OWNER CONSTRUCTION MANAGER (CM) THAT THE SITE HAS BE. FULLY STABILIZED AND ALL CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED, THEN A. REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (MIPS], I S. STABILI2E ANY AREAs DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY BMWS. AND C. ASK THE CM TO CONTACT KIIALEY.HORN AND AssOCIATES TO COMPLETE THE KIIALEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES pRE-NOT SITE INSpECION AND REpoRT (ONLY CM MAY DO MIS 14. CONTINUE DAILY WSPECTIONS AND REPORTS UNTIL THE CM ANAL ONLY IN I. SPECTION REPORT. MARKED 'R.Dy TO TERMINATE PERMIT.. IS SIGNED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ANC SUBMITTED VIA THE ONLINE SWPPP REPORTING SYSTEM PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. NOT. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR M. COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION-ROAT0130CITVIDES CONCURRENTLY. ONLY IF ALL PRECEDING MAPS AND STASILT<ATION ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY INSTALLED, SMP-RELATED STERS IN THE ABOVE SEQUENCE ARE BOLDED FOR C.RITy. THE AXE MUST APPROVE.114 WRMNO, ANY CHANGES IN ME ABOVE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE, BEFORE THEIR IMPLEMENTATION BEGINS. THE ESTIMATED DATES OF IMPLEMENTATION OF POLLUTION CONTRA) MEASURES SHALL BE DOCUMENTED BY THE CONTRACTOR ON THE SOIL EROSIONISEDIMENATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE ON sHEET r\c0° 1,3'4 01,cid ' :ALA Y.5 B. DUST ON SITE SHALL SE CONTROLLED ACCORDING TO THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7. RUBBISH. TRASH. GAPSNOE, LITTER OR OTHER SUCH MATERALS SHALL LIE DEPOSITED INTO sEALED CONTAINERS. MATERLALS SHALL BE pREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES IIIROUGH THE Nor. OF WIND OR STORIAWAT. DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE WATERS OF THE STATE a. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND RoLIK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SKALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE ImsINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 11. WITHIN TWO WEEKS Ms DAYS) OF SEM GRADINO. ALLOISTUNMEOAREAMRNAL/SEHTAMIUZAOWDH SEED, SOO, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PUNS FOR MAMMALS, 12. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH Cm, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PER MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH DALE 3150 MST 66771sTmEcr MI. MN 05•35 1.0 nI Key Horn EROSION LEGEND 0 SWPPP INFORMATON SION -e NO CONSTRUCTON TRAFFIC SIGN Il INLET PROTEOTON IMAGO INLET PROTECTION H..— 0 FLTREXXV SEDIMENT CONTROL — (2) Tennis., SCE PENCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET — 0 CONSTRUCTOR FENCE 10, THP CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVEAU. SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EMERNG STREETS AND1 PAVED AREAS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ILININNECLEARINO TO THE MASIMUM IL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS WENT PRACTICAL AR AS RED UIREO BY THE GENERAL PRIOR TO SREGRADING. PERMIT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE CONCRETE WASH WATER LOCATIONS, ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING. EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPER, TREATED OR DISPOSED ACCORDINO TO THE OENERAL PERMIT. 10. 707o1EN,f,,,,OCA.MFILHALL INSTALL CATCH .9IN EROSION 911/1'1.1=LZIT:17CX01;:PAUD:711%1LrYg LUT"Cr" CONSTRUCTLON AREAS. 11, WITHIN IWO WEEKS (1.1 DAYS) OF SITE GRADIN. ALL DISTURBED N90AS SM.. BE STAKILICED WITH °EEO, SOD ILL SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN A=R DANCE WITH CITY REDUIREMENTS. OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANOSGRE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON ME OR READILY AVAILABLE TO COWAN OLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS, 10. PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON ALL DISTURBED OR 12,. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BC INSTALLED GRADED SLOPES EXCEEDING...1V. AND MAINTAINED IN ACCOMANCEWITH QTY. AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. LET OSISTAIG STORM SEWER MANHOLE =STING CURB INLET EMT. ORATE INLET EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES THE STORMWATIN POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS 7, FILAIBISH, TRASH. IDARBA0E, LEITER, OR OTHER SUCH 11 THC CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL COMPRISED OF DRAWINGS. THE STANDARD DETAILS. THE MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF =PPP. PLUS THE GENERAL PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEDUEILT CONTAINERS MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE... OF WINO OR coNsnsuenoN. STORMWATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE WATERS OF THE D. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT HEST MANAGEMENT STATE, 19. ANT IECESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE PRACTICES AS REQUIRED ST THE SWPPP. AIDDITIONAL BEST REMOVED 37 THE CONTRACTOR. MANAGEMENT PRACICES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS IL ALL 194.11METPA SILT PENCE ANG RO. CONSTRUCTION DICTATED LW CONDITONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OF ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR 10 15, RE190VAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSMUCTION. VEOPTATION IS ESTABUSHED. IL DUST ON SITE SHALL BE CONTROLLED ACCORDINO TO THE GENERAL PERMIT. SITE LEGEND — PROPER, LINE .......... PROPOSE. PHASE 'LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PININNNII<Mms PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA - - -- MTN° MAJOR CONTOUR LW, NOSING MINOR CONTOUR 0.123 FLOWNLOPE ARROW ENISTRO STORM SEWER 4D4- MANIC SONE IN FIDET 0 BO MA ISTPIANCC ALL MEASURES STATED ON THP PLAN SHALL MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONk.CONDIIION UNTIL NO LOROER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED 111, A OUALIFIED PERSON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS CR THE APPLICABLE PERMIT, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT, AND REPAIRED IN AGOOROANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING. • 1. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ANL1 BARRIERS SHALL BEs L• REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF •'- UNDERIAINING OR DETERIORATION, E. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHELMID REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STANO IS MAINTNNED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTLIZEO, WATERED. AND RESEEDED M NEEDED SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED 10 THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. C. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROLI THE SILT PENCE WHEN IT REACHES ONE.HIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE- S. THP CONSTRUCTION Mr113 SHALL SE mAINTAINED ISA COMPTON WHIN WILL PREVENT TRACKNO OR FLOW OF SAUD ONTO PUBLIC RIONTS-ONWAT. THIS NAV REOUM PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION EXITS AS CONOMONS DEMAND. esc elness swenso5 graham architects SOO RashInplon avenue south RURRRNPCIIC 3'13"9'!' 555n71 5 1 0 . 3 3 9 . S 3 5 2 www.esgorch.com r-- Ilr,13,.• ALERT TO SUBCONTRACTOR: I. ITN PRESENCE OE OROUNDWAT. SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. SUBCONTRACTORS BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIOD.. WET WEATHER. PROVIDE ALIDOUATE DENTATE.. DRAINAGE ANO GROUND WATER MANAGEMEICT TO CONTROL MOISTLRE OE SOILS. E AU. SUBCONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, PFINAL sji ta GRADING) BC THE MILESTONE DATE IN ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT 'S GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1.10.2.1100 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN OTT AREA 651•93191017 — =IMMO EN a WE ST 6 6 P -1 ST 6 E E 1 PROPOSED BUILDING Roe NUR DRAINAGE AREA I/1 LOS AC _ Immeeimomm 11111.111111p/Wiiiii rii I '1 2.15 AACZTAGE PatZ'Og",,,r 00.1710 cHoLrto NED,. PHASE 1 PLAN SET No. Doscmlon 160755002 .MC1 num.. RU RAP OMY Glafl10 MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH EU LE EROSION CONTROL PLAN PHASE I C2.2 AREA SUMMARY SITE AREA (PHASE 1) 133,370 SF 07.090 SE 19.030 SF 3.702 163,70“E PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS IPHASE 1) PROPOSED PERVIOUS LPHASE 1) PERVIDUBMPERVIOUS RATIO (PHASE 1) ulnas OF DISTURBANCE PHASE 1) MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH DALE Kjm]ey ») Horn esc olonmatoon polumairhINGt 320 Rubinson smut ONTANO r.rtr pv^rt T. 61 2.330..03 12 www.osgsreh.corn Inenalmevenal tom, PHASE 1 PLAN SET Ne. Deuript. Octe (6070)002 BD RAP MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH DALE SITE RAN PHASE I C3.1 TOTALPROPERWAREA 131,51,P1157.2 IcArwcar 13.74AG, TOTAL0105.1ROEDAREA PROINOSCO ImP.CRVIDVOAREA 0-7,4“/. t2.28AGJ pROPOWO PERVIONO AREA 36030 RP NAIAD OWTHOIONIND P0154 PROPOOEDIONNO PUO ou5DNOSETeAcw Trt L REAR .1%7 NATION la.r4247.agn,,,igzavo.."° PROPERTY SUMMARY (PHASE 1) NTH AND VOFIN roNwa suconn Av PARANOSETHAEM 15LLSTINORANPAND IME51111 PROPERTY' LINE — — — SETBACK LINE PROPOSED OM AND OMER PROPOSED INTEGRALLY COLORED CONCRETE PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED STANDARD DUN ASPHALT wOINIMMONISMERMII ,.1•'.1=151111•211111•111011n 21,A. PARALLEL OUESTPARKNG masa (11,11111.P )1ki 1111;1;111 - 40n1.3 11311MIMIN,•;111WI MIN/ '21 MOM IR CONCR51£ PIPE JA12 (oo/oor 21,11) I. CLASS 5 AGGREGATE CASE CAN/OOT 2211) COMPACT TOP 3. OF SUOMADE 7D A MINIMUM Of 1E05 OF gAtiOurgInC,14/141p,11,4A,DISTURE CONTENT MINIM 3N Of BEIVEAMFuTV24g"'ml;"'""` .INSET C , ENT TYPE WEARING COURSE 1AN/DOT SPEC Two, 1W 50 E SP (w50330.) BINIANDUS TACO COAT (NN/OOT 2157) I, Oa TYPE NON-WENRING =MOE LIN/DOT SPEC NM. TYPE 5P (SPNW133300) • CLOD 5 ADCRECATE 0000 COURSE WN/DOT 3,30) CDP,MIC,F4 J, 111 119. low0 GONCRCTE MOM. I. ummv .101J-112n • 1177.010 MK) coonoroccos 5A5CmcW. SITE PLAN NOTES I. ;00,k03;1nTItITTAII.V.riVAla 0. 000 AT LU ROTA OTEC NITMIAL, at? 2„., EL, AOL ROCTCOS000CAIOLACLD ; • ';'P'z';c7T41..t.roz:2`.,gctng.13=`,!,1"4". 0. ALL 004005000 ATE OTOAT00000 50100. ""°' ART TO TOO "" AT 0/OS WALTON ▪ E000300.EFIE3-221140"014:^I'E'T 7. L UTO St1ALL OE RESPON,SWE (OR ALL RCLOGITONS. CALM I LINI1. TO, ALL POLLS VC. LL EASE=T =MAT= ALLCONTRACTORSIAUSTCONTACT GOPHERSTATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 14100.2.1100 SEPORECONNTRUCTIONOEGINS TWIN VIVA., 6514540002 r1rAg112E^EA'N'ItUetVOIIT3V0;• 05114U1.11.1015TURE CONWAY. CONCtell PRE JAM (MN/ACT no.) CLAW 3 AGGREGATE RAZE (MN/SOT2215) /Mk JTCAANN0NNTOOLT8 !_) `6E.FAhlT,F1-1"1"7'144°A\`; 0 C6 LAT6 .11:.`41" 01.111MINOVS TACR OGNT (LINAC OT 23571 YN"C'OT"4•1C'r3V.VIZCSIC'et=vroaCcc) 0.0.0005 ACGAEGATE 005E COURGC (UA/TCT 0100) RA T TO SUBOON E VOR ALERT 1. TRE PRESENCE or ORGONOWAWR GREOLD OE ANTOPATOD ON T PROJECT. SUBCON 1415 ISSUE. I003CVOOTn• LOST Em MA COOL 0000100) NT ;ZZI[',1%`N`,".1,111%.,tt, AU CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT' GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1.00-42/11011 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION MOMS TWIN CITY AREA OS145.0002 elness swenson graham architects 500 washIngton avenue south 13n.ln0"1'71',3"1"rn r1715/3 S.' " S c o FT CU TN MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH DALE 3250 Vd.1 4.0711 STRUT NSW IAN 5,135 esc 011AVIA 13CHCOLILC aIII.1111111 IV 7,7,ZZ'Alt= LEGEND SHALL1141.1VOLVIV, NOTIFY 1Nt V4.1.01,1.101H.1701. AHV 1.9017EPANCIE.1 VAPIATIOHO. Itr0'17=1:;;Y'7,7=10OfT0L1Tirli*C9'Et OL:1;g7Z=V.Vir' O. CONIPACM1041All NHIPON01131-,ONA1.1.1-1017170WAL VENOCAL CONTROL. =7,,r,C,i1a,S4=-.CMGVAIT DRANA.Or mucxra OLLOW PPOPIDOCD WORM CONT.CTOR ISPCOPONOVVC FOR CONSVMUCIPNOF PAVVUENTS 4,11, CURB ONO CUITER ILAOOTHLINIFORYI IBLOPRI PROVIDE ['DOME IV.1101.0(.. It WS., MININV V Or r cuss b ACCVICOML 6V1C UNDER C.I.13/V. 12. UPON CONRVIION Or EXCAVP1104.10 f11-1.1n40. 001,1ACIA11....171,,XIC 17TCUrjrrITC=VI =g0V-P'OZ GgN." n'Ag " .2,131.4n1;11,grZfONSOVOWNARZ•V.1 C.40170170LINOLLVEL UNLESS PROPCIMUNC 0„011A0 CONTOUR PROPOOCO CONTOUR PROVOISCO PROPOSCOCATCNEWIN PROPOSED WORN SEWER V.V(VILD SPOT .V/.110V 1.40V01111.0, ARROW SANTIS S il3t1..E FEET., 41. (11ffil, —..1111111.11Ipaillinallin1101.1111 "411174111M111.1147"10 - r 111111111111 111111 • ALERT TO SUBCONTRACTOR: 1. THE PRENEN OE OE AAOIJNDWOTEIE SHOULD BE ENDOWED ON THIS PROJECTMUSCONTSPCTOIES BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERACON FOR THIS ISSUE. WNEN PERFORMING GRADING OPEMOSIONS DUPING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER. PROVIOE PMEOUSTE DEW/OCRING. ORSINACE AND GROUND WATER MANACEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. 2. pasZal'EFTITgZIL;r;-ITVLEZZa% IN 014/0.1.4 C1.101.4., °71,7 'aU.V 74,WAZIT Z11',11.1=17 7r1f== 111.1.11?? PHASE 1 PLAN SET No. Dem/Duo/ Onta 160755002 "PPP' INJ RAP MAN MILLENNIUM AT 5OUTHDALE OVERALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C4.1 PROPERTY 4111C COWING CONTOUR PROPOSED cooroun MCKIM 0 Involona RM. NOR, WIN PHOPOOLO STOW OEUVER MOP.. OHOT IntiVAIION WON MUTING CI.CVAT1ON KOVOOLOME IMOCINICAN I5D15 • MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH DALE WITST 66111 STRUT LONA, IAN MIS ONAINADO OCHTIOLNO 111Z1Z OU 1111 01111a0 NIA En *ALERT TO SUBCONTRACTOR: Las or VIA I. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPAIED ON THIS PROJECT. SUBCONTRACTOR'S IND.., INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR THIS ISSUE. INNEN PERFORMING CRADINO OPEN/MD. OUNIND PeRioos OF WET TVGLNEN. PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEVVATERINC, DRAINAGE AND °POUND WATER INENAOEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. 't„`„t'oakiVEZZ2V,,TU,°,0r,t,F,°,7;,Vrtnlarg,It. PROJECT 00CUMENTN. TrAIr EN. ann. no moo \ •13.1111 77,1t SIPA, e n •NIX1 IV ALL CONTUCTONS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL (111,1-600411,11611 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION 0E01. TININ MY*. 11.51.65.00E2 Kimley*Hom esc chess 55 ROES ROAST archnens 500 washIngton overrun lauth Pn.lr1"111, inTr3 05010 6 I 2 . 3 1 9 . 53 B 050.550a15h.com ' ZtTr=ZT.Tgr,,tt:Iltrtr,,ILM7rr.,=.74=r1°.17.,'" p CONTRACTOR SHALL In NTOPONOIINE FON HOW/0.4 AND VERTICAL CONTROL O. 0.=,,TON SrLL ITNCOVATE DRAINNOVOIENCIICII MEOW PROPOSED STORM /. own encrannnn /manta awns. CONTRACT01111.../.1101.101101NOCTO DLC --- -- \ -- ---- F ss, 1 agr RIP:r I r (wax ,•n • • ,'.-111•1111101111MIIMIIMMIlmillff MT -,11a 11.1111IXE RIN Slog amp our \050P 0550 'Wine \ NOV\ DRAIN ME, INI01111110 11111115111111 sno-ro MAINT,N1ED 1110 DS WOWED. 11C-43001 RC. OF 0 SHOWERS HINN WATER IN, 0110.2, ME SHEET GOA \ LECENO CRAITIC STitLE IN FEL-r,,,, SUOGRADELLTVKIPNONEILEAVb OTHEETHEN17,01731.10[0.9, 11. WT., MINIMUM OE r CU. AOLOICONTE DASCLINSCP WM AND COTTETT r..11 tch01;loClX,IOnT LOCAVANON ONO ENUN4 CONDIOCTORONALL nartaliE ALL 11C.NENETATED WITH =OV'C'Otf01.11%°="R'''''' 041.7,0=r1S 0110VINME70 ULM MO Cr C11110 011011CYNO ISVEL UNLE.103 IA. OEN OHEST COI PON UTLEE/ ClIONINIIINF011.7101.14 PHASE 1 PLAN SET NO. OtHCAntlen Date 160750002 RAP MILLENNIUM AT SOUTHDALE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN PHASE I C4.2 DRAINMICOCNE.O. =g,Tgf,r.g4 Nun ON% In Ens NA 111710 Var anon M I L L E N N I U M A T S O U T H D A L E u n L n y P L A N P H A S E I C 5 . 1 P H A S E 1 P L A N S E T MILLENNIUM AT SOUTHDALE 1250 MITI 1,141 TATIFT OLE LANDSCAPE NOTES ALL L0050/0000 ARRAS ARE TO RECENS A IANIMLINI OF 4. Of rktr,Ing.tz,14 TICINTIMAIT58,"E " 01,°A,Titg`4°A"IggilVa0Eg'" APT ALF.Vpfotlat.32'.„%n":47`,1,7°°" AT ""' ""° a`,-,1`,1°,1=4Ea.".,?'Iggr -u" "A F.- -AA LAS AND ORAl/ANONITRE.25"'T TLANTIAA TA MAINTAIN MnrCAOrlPtLIZ, to'4aAVVat`Juall,"-eL'ITIS4'71"?ttl,..F ALL PLAN.RND BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN. gt,'NE?".1401n11` T4tra grAt411°Z;g"""° 16. ASSTIAA PALS AR SIANITITAIT SARA LNASSNO 1/LOT TI 511/ " Mnier*Horn -"IrsziRr- esc elonareenensflumarthltss 500 yanhInalan awn Inath 0'.'"6"111!117.1111 T. 6 I 2.03 9. 3 I 2 www.essarch.com ALI SON TRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE NIN TOLL MEC 1-0014S2,1011 REFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS T, TWIN CITY /TEA 1/115444101 NO CRAPC/A,S FEES. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS =agagarr'''' NUTMEA OP TR DM PROATTED SYMOOL OAF PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE COMALIN NAME SWAMP WHITE °AA Sal DX CAL ROOT RAO 0 ° ,'`IP" OE COMMON HAG/BERRY ACCOIATIC Mu EST CAL Se CAL BAB FRG MANN 1111.MC 10,12 CRINDON 51,1K Mil 2.5. CAl 2., GU. 0 AO RAS BOULLYARD LINDEN DAKOTA PINNACLE BIRCH Se CAL TAD MB CONT. 0 SMALL/TrINTAL 41 MAY GUI LILAC SHOWY MOUNTAIN ASH 1.4. CAL RN B/0 CONT. CRADALE PURPLE PAIN= PP AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICIGTERRY 1,0. CAI. Tr CM- Data RAT DER E IP 4 BLACK HILLS GFRUCE MITURIATu 00/1 Al IMO IMF/ DU. NDNEYSUCELE DOGWOOD 00 LILAC SPIREA TA IE., RASA AJAR. HYDRANGEA AT AT CONT. .1RUILQ.,ErML SULTAC IT IA CONS NARL FOERSTER GRASS CATMINT IT II CONT. CONT. CRISPING PRIER PURPLE CONEFLOWER r 51 DONT. 0007. /MILT n sa07. e-a‘.4n "aprialbalritillarelliaW292REMn iL4- .5- 1, 11117011111111115111=10ZZEiratill Nnsr4116- ANAL aljkIN 1....„11111111 ARYL AMYL AY/ AMYL .A1d4b. 11111 ‘11111 111 IP U U giV gt`Xa'NJ 61) 1—$ •NAC PHASE 1 PLAN SET 160755002 ..0111.1 FNMA BD RAP 414n.11, MILLENNIUM ATSOUTHDALE LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll .0 ALERT TO SUBCONTRACTOR: PC PRESENCE Or GROWIDIVATER SHOULD BE ANOCIPAILD ON 1NIS PROJECT. S WS ID SHALL INCLLOEIZIS=0.Nal INA= AND ,:`,,taS°iNNIZ`.`a,Tal,Z; TTIMr.''.'n''',4VAT ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. ArT 5WaTiE7TH TaLTITROTIITLEUENDD) MULCH FINISHED CRAPE PLANTING DETAIL FOR MASS PLANTING BEDS ' 0 PARKING SPACE/CURB PLANTING gn`67.Z.J.° OV,E"°Z2 K2,7,1L-LELTYLWAnffEs. C'UTS'DE 2. REQUESTS TO SUBSTITUTE RUBBER HOSE AND WIRE GUYING SYSTEIAS WILL NV BE APPROVED. J. TREE STAKING IS NOT REQUIRED UNLESS SPECIRED OR NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN TARML.A,,, %Le% CONoyerlDIVIVA=LISIA SOIL OR MIND CONDITIONS ARE A. REMOVE AFTER ONE YEAR. TREE STAKING / GUYING DETAIL MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH DALE 3250WEST OOP STRICT LONA. MN 5543, esc einem 5nNenson graham Architects 500 waiM114Ron MR UT SOLO TFIOSOMRYIVFRRSRROFR N'SB A N. gl?c 3 4 'CI FIT ALERT TO SUBCONTRACTOR• PRENENGE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BC ANTICIPATED ON.TNISa 77.1.".A.7ME...'1017;7=NrOlintLAIWAng"5111=PEAFIL PAT, vANATNAN. PROVIDE ADEOUAIE DCWATRINC. DRAINAGE AND GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOIST. OF GOP. 2. ALL .DCONMAGTON WORN TO GE CEMPLITIN (EARTHWORK. FINAL LINUNE4 AND INN, GRADING) BY INIE MILESPPC DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENT& FURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE A THE TREE'S ORIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 2 5 FEET FIETONO THE DRIP LINE. PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20 INTERVALS. TEMPORARY PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENT DETAIL STANDARD TREE NOTE, ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT IN GOPHER STATE CALL ONE Z'oTgt.TrfRtt,'-7-02,=. TWIN CITY AREA 451454-0002 , PHASE I PLAN SET No. DemriplIon 160755002 RjJ RAP PAN MILLENNIUM AT 5OUTHDALE LANDSCAPE DETAILS L1.1 ere DATA slts Area NPILIWtato 1,0p.voro 42 t;Ft::.: ZZZ:Zei; V: can seeep Po.. lor...re Int) TpL4 pp,Pq 1,00,4 M. 4. una074 M m Na .20 two. 20 car. ;"I7.n 5.10 E64:4" :g.L'ars VP•P,Pom .50 trtvdreom • I05 Millennium at Sou thd a In t!,'X.,7;,n="." DLC NnidrioIrAlt 1,1." kumear UrIn 3.21 ee" n.nr.nAAt Ft' ?:1:11Z COM PREI-IENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 RO.ILIONL ‘1n11ennime at Soulhdak ILLUSTRATIVE AINSTLIt PLAN N NT PHASLS I P A0.0a „011tr're.p gency- Allstate Insurance Jacob Group Agency Coiwtp', 0_1 - 1 4. ,-/•-• Heart6Mallerf.5 A Minn./ Patncici13.11ery & Cole Q'f'‘ Edina • ;i. . _ 'ts lied Pe I • • - .E-thmat :sr • "IrSi 4. tfittl'ee,r _ Goigte;64,Taco Bll I MEM fs' e .„ itna 020160- nalelobI.D.S.Geole Mal Gunter. dassO20tOG la 30 arth v tem= avads13.1. T.enr. 'Pnvace Soncl feedback leift 7, 0-• 4: C. Hamlin &Winne enter Elfin UWATILAPI. PIASTER PUN VORA AVENUE -1.0LAINA.50,4 tattIta. AT WA AVE - WOAD. SOVTAVILST Millennium at Southdale SOP ANA•Aimato. Aron.. total. D LC At—ar- 1-6 ttOlaa AtViva - LOOKS.. 50,1, INIERSELatION B.00.EatattD Alt tOirtarlE, CORNEA Oa tt,/, NOM11a,51 ICall.ZON OF SPE LOOKINC. c N ErtAITNOt PARRIttp PA" It1-0/9 LVILDIA0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP de REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 mit Mut, ..... Chaarr artMt,t.. Illenntunt at ...Ma* ,11, 141 tt LES A0.1 a Millennium at Southdaie DLC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 71,61100 3ED 4IIIIennlunl al Southelale LEVI, I NAN -1,714, I 4 4114. LEVEL PI PLAN- PHASE, & PHASES A0.2a Millennium at Southdale /-n /1 /-1 LEVEL 1 SITE PLAN- PHASE 2 esc PNN.Nnhinaten ...Nue tau. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP& REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 PtyPPINN No. OxseNtrupn Oxi• IllenPlum at Nouthdale LEVU I SITE PON - PNASt X A0.3 a Millennium at Southdale 11,4 $1.11t es tttttt COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 XS. .1.811. 1.1.• AliNelmitirn at Solithdale LEVEL 2 PLAN - PEIASE I A PHASE A0.4a © LEVELS PLAN- PHASE 1 St PHASES Millennium at Southdale tam.. tit, ',nit - - 741111111n .- -- - C 2,2 `too..,22 at2222 .2 ,2.112.512s 27.-- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 Mu, NUM 21dieiatilJm at sauthdale 1,22,2.i la I - 1,21 VIE 2 A 0 . 5 a Millennium at Southdale MuWeiieoih,1.1.1 Af 0.UL 1,1R6FCCTIVC VIM or 9ACCI WIATIAM112 01,.71...,../CROFT,T4eV7, 1.00.0 1442R-1, AO. LW L.VATION urgr.VIrvue. PCIUMFTIVC JIMA .01.16 004711 AT Wt./ 41:. COIATTARD D L C H DE'N' " sn'. 11%. h'.'n nn COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT POPE REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 21,11 Millennium ot southilale \.) leMIIPICTIVL — 1 A0.6 a ,TIKEZT Lmete VILA UCKINO , Ch71, 1 I II 11 1 1 1 1 I II 1 11 1111111 LX15713. WILDS. AND PAR.K11.5. PHASE 2 II , r 1/111 PA is_ 11. 9ffiemPREPIEllmeiroo tali Mil 4Rir ,0A hisuranalia =.1.proruir. TIPP "mom TWP CF wilm - TEMPORARY CELL TOWER LOCATOR Millennium at Southdale • ' " re-) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP A REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 4.14.151N., If, 1,01,10M kl Hien mum Suuthdale CELL TOW. 00111111" A0.7a r=.• 1"7771 Millennium at Southdale EXIST/NG TITUS BUILDING AND PARKING PHASE 2 L, EMISTINGRAMP 4.fift. trW 0044 topiD, 171111:144;04:14xn 1.4140 Ala ,11114111 MICHRECTURAL SUM PLAN - PHASE 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT POP ai REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 MG. Often.111. DAM c-6 Aiahur CM1.rleir 1.11ennium southd4le A.1111-tcnntat strr rLAN - PHA. I Al .0a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • B • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • ULU. I I • n C • II • • 1— — L 11/—rlf=r- • • 111.L.,41.6 • III''''' 11111111 • • • • • • • • 0 • • OLE .1 SOO W.Imalen rim rv) I a I.: • — • II I — -8 II -11— • : 111 a • I I- I II II — • ' lia51 . a — I 6 • 18118.19 I • II 11 a •] . • • • • • • 11111111 11111111 727 • • • • • • Millennium at Southd a le 01.•110,11.SItort LEVEL P1 PLAN , .11 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT POPE REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 011141,01M. ,..• 11151.104. Mo. Lai.11.191 11110,1 1[Til[it 1[ s; • a; s s; s; 11111111 B • • 1 • • ; • • • ; -1-1 [-• Fri [11 1-1 I • • • • • • • • • • 8 • a 11 • B • • 11111111 • • • • • • • • • AllnenM1111rn LEM P2 .P1 PLANS LEVEL P2 PLAN Al .1 a Millennium at Southdale LZ.nnnn 7,7n,'""' alna. nnnnn an ootAaa. oeFloott SOO onnlonotun nnnnnn •Noth rrint rr nn n 7 ' ; g-- ret, allau SV/SI /-11.11 I OAP SI LEVELS PLAN- PHASEI LEVEL I 6 MANS Al . 2 a tla 1,00t„ MOWN, LEVEL 24 PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 SUNRISE COURTYARD Nu. ouu LAC 141,0 J-11 I %AI SUNSET COURTYARD V•1, r-11. 1.1Io LI/ 1,001 sr 'Mint Clo.c.11, Nollenolum at soot NI al Our . LUL JAL Lit ,i11111 Lit I U0141 IAA 1,11%1 si LAIL Imo NI LILL111-, Itm 1-11 Imo o WV, LILL re' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP B. REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 MOW. LLL 1.1.111 NI LILL LlL 1.011. 11 1.11 1.6.4•1 LEVEL e PLAN LIE P. 11 LILL 1,1111 L LA. 1..”1 LAIL 000 LLO011ati LLL 1,011. Si Lit ri• 11 LLB. lorlo .LJAL 1,1,1 Millennium at Southdale DLC I t IN I tAL IA,/ Sr S.Waa J.41, SAL 1.vo Ut US- 1.011111 LEVEL I A- 6 MANS LEVELS PLAN Al . 3 a Millennium at Southdale No.. 1S111 DLC n•n T I .1 cm vallunpron ...... too. ;7:Tr! rrrn n•••••n••.•...• COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT POP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 E=7/ Llillenniuln Soutbdul 1100r PLAN Al . 4 a Millennium at Southdale PCSinarrn Cx AA APPitaKmix4 :Ran 500,11.00,1,4 NOrt, rrt.Cm riounA5r L07147,4 00,,liqv AMIAL PERVECTIVC sarri Min acnIxelts7 1....77.N0,1nEn01 DLC cm -- ::"1.""r°t 1`7771VVI .I i ,1 . ...en. _ _ -- - - - r - 44 riP14.111111671010111riffi :JO 1:::: :: _ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PUP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 1,11,14A1. hsut eav1413.. DOCIIn 110fl A111,1111 14111ennom .nn southdak PERO C[111VE VIEIVS - 4sE A 3 . 0 a Millennium at Southdale SOD ...ton ..1111. Vrrq"! r7".77'; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 . 70 -v L CC7. VC VICN %DM 9C47.24.07 /0C,K1/6 x027111,01- NtL,12,_ a= MI Ilk, mu 0i 41 ,0011441e PLIINILLITL11l.— Y., I A3.1 a 91,CRISVCI. rmarcarsvc vicr. or DM, 0 0427.T./ PCP CC VC,. l24.0 MO/. /LOTS CA, C./74. mime" 11.4 :.mammtlemi now e 0 el I I le, Ole 0 e scrEilloilwrERIALKEYNOTES :::•Mr,FixoFum To Itowara-NORIZONIAL,MACIf -rowo[O-.P.VOWAL,A.ACING •VallICA,41-:=C P011.41100106.coNv 10 CNYIALL MIllennIUm at Southdale DLC %OD waslIonple4 n ";"': ' ' ° COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 NORTH ELEVATION 1/10.-141. .....n ............---------- sokemeutipmesomi DmttlEawaup,10 ""t_r42:!,, ,, 1_61, LILA U ..., , ...... 7 -_ lr.:... .„.•.,, Irlil il A 'r- H L ,•1 itiirt-ri-I-1-1.. 7ii "rill- 1'1. 1 . „ , , i -rill!! n "• AI Erni, ri .,,.....„,, _..... _ goimmat 0, .......---.-=.,;....,...-----=_. EAST ELEVATION ro" OfICINAL M1,111 ktV1,1044 Mo. trinfriplion ,111.1111411-1,1 Solltklair ExTENIoR 13,,IONS WEST ELEVATION A 3 . 2 a DLC . es ........ ..... on... waskingten Avunue sem. .. . 7 . 6A - HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATE PANEL (LIGHT WOOD GRAIN) 68 - HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATE PANEL 6C - POLYCARBONATE PANEL (CUSTOM BLUE) (MAGENTA) \\\ 9A - PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING 9B - PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING 9B - PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING Millennium at Southdale EA= MalII -U 1A - BRICK - NORMAN 1B - BRICK - NORMAN (BUFF) (BLACK) 5A - METAL PANEL 5B - METAL PANEL (BLACK MATTE) (CHAMPAGNE METALLIC) 11 - FIBERGLASS WINDOW/DOOR la 1)% (DARK BRONZE) 0 (GALVALUME) (CHARCOAL GRAY) (CHARCOAL GRAY) 2A - LANNON STONE ''.11111111111111 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT POP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 PrVIMONS No. Mocript. !.=••n• Authoi Allil;nnItirn ...ale VOIRI011 AI/01111AB A3.3 a 0 4z, 0 NORIH-SOUTH SECI1ON 1-• I LH• n 111BIN 01 2 „oru. RESIDENTIAL PARKING PARKING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP 8, REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 INsUr la% r.loW. 1.1111ennlunn at SouthtlaIr BUILDING NEGTIONS A4 . 1 a Millennium at Southdale .11414,11,1130$ DLC 11')Esci ,DO wnlh melon ay.. vauln nn"."r"t"r ;"; "" " 7'; D — arribatek mrwanIMINK,om IssViglow1.111.00.10 AftariN,V11.110 nainololuaigro PAAMMINENI• -ftweaftneallWraft.••••n Client DLC RESIDENTIAL LLC Project CASSIN'S OUTLOTS Location EDINA, MN Certification Summary prAwn. Revision History No Date By Submittal / Sheet Title ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY Sheet No. Revision 1/1 Project No. 1/11120414 1n 111•111111n 111 7.= —LEGEND .,"".0komw — mumuor 7,:22r VE R S E S AV E N U E SO UT H = =SURVEY NOTES NO3110TH MAP iiimwd,111: ca tt ( — litC THE YORK OF EDiNA flit 4512 tr71+1.." —/ ( +I' jikeir / CASSiN'S REP L A T - - - YORK AVE /< _ - TT-- , \( 5 z — —UP [17.1[1151.11.. 1,41nIfl U04. MLIft. 114LIG• CERTIFICATION las7.03 ; WEST 66TH STREET int. LOT 6;1';;11 onn111 rzY‘ L.TAY - Mal,W7roi opc.-Ka-ww. -,- - icrieegtir g,' gg t, --r" I .) , SUBJECT PROPERTY =.1-ABLE A" NOTES Millennium at SouthdaIe ,54n 5 DLO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 1/20/2016 1.,1510N, ELEVATOR. OVElele. 3ED Millennium .11,301,4e ROOF PLAN ROOF NAN Al . 4 a MP. VA err :2LAV. LEGEND PROPERTY LINE - SETBACK LINE PROPOSED CURD AND OUTTEN PROPOSED INTEGRALLY COLOREDCONCRETE PROPOSEDCONCRETESIDEWALK PROPOSED STANDARD OLOY ASPHALT PROP:35E171113NT DUTY ASPHALT ALL CONTRACTORS LAUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE NOT/TOLL FREE ...23111U °C,Z4V,P=Z:r , 11.10111.10 SAMMY OMER ALERT TO SUBCONTRACTOR: I, INC PRESENCE OF CROUNOWARR DREAD BC ANICIPATI23 DA IDE cIPMEILIPPVETININTDCRWO:ElutA'xgrarroWKI KO% IrTNY "COLEN?VutoUrBrs" TLIV.S.""D it.gri:107/r gA'OLZ fIrNILIC=1*E"1740tC7 --- -e- 0 0 ,0 0 PHASE 1 PLAN SET No. Delcholion 16075 5002 maMLIWAll PS RAP MILLENNIUM AT SOUTHDALE SHE PLAN PASSE) C3.1 MILLENNIUM AT SOUTH DALE 3130 OW 33X1E2 COIN, MN 554 75 OLC Kimley*Horn 1 PROPERTY SUMMARY (PHASE 1) .71-1 AND YORK PARABO ws, sot um Tol-AL PR DP[1,', In en LT 13,7 AC) "37 -1-01-AL Oern,lorp AR(.• 10.1 ago r.”3.19...Cn 023 PROPOSED NII.C.laus ”01,0CLO PENVOL.0 ARO 20H7AlsUNO/rf esc 36,0207,0410.1 P00.1 01.1LINO.X1.10 ”OPOZPOIPNW SnlikAe. 111.11...103011...5 tr.-Aar 30. rA <IOUS soonsart /plum architects 300 washfrpton avenue somb ,TVI°21! n"5.1 0. 6 1 2 3 3 9 . 5 3 It www.e.sparch.cern (0 ,----"- , . n *$, . .90 7 /16400:004: ' / mosimsamsammi--ormov,dini,,,,„_, ar,\0_00. .....• \ ibi FA% 4.41. 00 4 0.14Y sarsalarmasommaall Illiallalseantrova 7 11111,44,11011MralrFazi p.rz1;1n,,, =V: ”, LITAtrs, PnItal.(111. 0.C.51,41110.11, 1.110.1(1111.111.03 MAO. zg,Pgr.mr. rn.'"orgwr, HENNEPIN COUNTY .7.10/1 TrIMACC E'acc- SITE PLAN NOTES VR,Mr.rateXt.T4T,:Ztt • COLORACTOR WU. KKR TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PUNS FOR EXEC( LOCATORS AND 131147410N5 Of .1100.20 SLOPE PAY., r= TN; ma= anN,74.7.ozto.. •• • atznat. RADII ARC 30 TIC fACC Of C1220 UNLESS • EFEcERTELF,1"."`,.r.'cL'=`,2 7 DOORACTOR SHALL OC RESPONSIOLC FOR ALL. MOUE 01NCIDOSE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LOOTOD UTILITICS. STORM DONNA. SONO -LUDIC DONALD 00311. FRVA124`Yr SCOttlAtA 1,°1070` SLIT ROTS rozveAt.L TM KARIN° COOS 101/DOT SPEC 2240. TWA 5P (SPODB2700) OfILYNOUS TAM COAT (E01/007 0307) 1.0. Olt TYPE 110X-OtAXEC CCURSE 1211/007 SAW 2.300. ME DP (SE04.1300) CLASS 5 AOCRECKIE BASE COURSE DOVE. 3E30 =PACT WO S Of SUDO/NEC 113 A IIINDIUD Of 1022 Of AROARD PROCIOR VALE NOISTALE 0.110fr 0111RN ZX Of MEWL/ 31015TURE =ADVT. ▪ COICASTE TXPE DA32 (EN/D07 2531) ▪ REACT Acme-um BASE (3114/1707 22.) COLLPACT LCOL X CI SUOCRADE 10 • uomiUM Of 1.20 Of t7404210.PROCICATorx, 3131501RE MOW WINN .3:0 OF JNSET C 03NCRRE MCCWAIX CONCRITE TYPE 3A31 (EN/D03 2E31) ACOLEGA„ TE SAS (101/DOT 2211) =Az gr= "X= Irga; INSET D CONCRETE 2311.6.700C IDLOTING DM, ro CRAPHIC SCALE S 1711 0 15 30 DO =1= r ttvc ounwe 13,30133E 0113/DOT SPEC 2380. TIPS SE (2.0203X0) 11111.11NOUS TAO, COAT 001/007 2337) CT BIT. PITT NC*1-YEALONG CCU= 101/COT SPEC 2300 277•E NP (233134,3300) IC 0-435 A:GAMIC BASIC =CM (.M0, 513,) MAAR TV 3' OF SUBORADE TO A WAWA OF 100X OF IMMO PAW)* 1133STURE CLAM, WWI CA OPRINAB SWIM CONIENT. TAW FREE L'OLSLST ST SLANTED. ALE. fCRIAAT O. Dna WO MCA IS j I fr i n T I -1 1 1 T i l I l i 1 1_ 1 f -1 -I -J • 1 ' N i R il l I 1 L I I 1 1 I D > ):H YIj IMalgtaari.7411 Al ERT TO SUBCONTRACTOR: .c PRESENCE OF CRWINONelER SNOOD Or ArdliCiPaTED ON DIG ad, FRONDE eDEOUVIL OneeltRINO.13ReiNeCE AND OROuND *MLR ueNALNENT CONTROL leNSINRE OE SW, g'011T0`; f1T°.`,LT7,,r:Zr[7.15.01r:ZiT 261:100. NSA 14441 ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE laN TOLL FREE 1wie wit-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS 10041 eirl AREA est-Gam Kinnley*Horn ON04 swenson graham ardthas SOO vashIngton avenue south tnInneapolls Wont,. 55315 P.612.339.5508 f. 612339.5162 www.e.sgarch.com PHASE I PLAN SET 00. ancriptoon Datt 160755002 Nuen-G10, 11/1 RAP MILLENNIUM AT SOUTHDALE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN PHASE) C7.1 1.21 o. 4 1.10 1.17 3.3 4.7 0.2 4. ,f01000,0 P.0.000 00,10,111,Fl MILLENNIUM AT SOUTHDALE 12501.51 6.1 STRUT WI, PAN 05.13: 2/15/2016 Luminaire Schedule 0,5)000: 6TH Liehtlog Alliance culatIon semment *13)5/0* 35K LIehtina alliance Label ea area 1:Hil—WiTaT—iot_iorth ToP Illuminenoe Front c, 402 and 44ve_1,0 therninence Selewelk I.Jap ThI0ppop Sidewalk %Joe illuinGence Side Yea 6_,00 Illeminence GvnWed QtV Label arranoement Total Lamp 1,1710115 SINGLE ell00 00 I c SINGLE 0.900 95960E0_TYPE111 GRApir 51;;;;;;1,410oLE U on TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS DLC RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH & YORK EDINA, MINNESOTA Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N St. Paul, MN 55114 DECEMBER 2015 I V1 A Kimley*Horn 44-4 TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS DLC RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH AND YORK EDINA, MINNESOTA PLAN APPROVAL DLC Residential By: Dated: Edina Community Development Department By: Dated: Edina Public Works Department By: Dated: DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 441 TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS DLC RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH AND YORK EDINA, MINNESOTA REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. William Reynolds, FE., AICP, PTP Date License No. 52627 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Contents 1.0 Background 1 City of Edina Transportation Goals 1 Traffic and Parking Analysis Objectives 2 2.0 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit 5 Pedestrian 5 Bicycle 5 Transit 5 3.0 Parking 8 4.0 Traffic Operations 9 Existing Traffic Conditions 9 Background Growth and Future Traffic Conditions 12 Trip Generation and Distribution 17 Delay and Queuing Analysis Results 25 Recommendations 26 5.0 Appendix 27 Appendix A: Supplemental Exhibits A-1 Appendix B: Level of Service Results and Queue Projections B-1 Appendix C: Sinffraffic Reports C-1 Appendix D: Parking Demand Memo D-1 iv DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I vi Tables Table 4-1: Morning Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase I 17 Table 4-2: Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase I 18 Table 4-3: Morning Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase ll 19 Table 4-4: Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase II 19 Table B-1: 2018 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary — AM and PM Peak Hour Delay ... B-2 Table B-2: 2018 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary — AM and PM Peak Hour QueuingB-3 Table B-3: Phase I (2018) Build Conditions — AM and PM Peak Hour Delay B-4 Table B-4: Phase 1(2018) Build Conditions — AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing B-5 Table B-5: 2024 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary — AM and PM Peak Hour Delay B-6 Table B-6: 2024 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary — AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing B-7 Table B-7: Phase 11 (2024) Build Conditions —AM and PM Peak Hour Delay B-8 Table B-8: Phase 11 (2024) Build Conditions — AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing B-9 Figures Figure 1-1: Project Location 3 Figure 1-2: Site Plan 4 Figure 2-1: Transit Routes Near the Site 7 Figure 4-1: Existing (2015) Lane Geometry 11 Figure 4-2: Future Year (2018) AM No Build Turning Movement Volumes 13 Figure 4-3: Future Year (2018) PM No Build Turning Movement Volumes 14 Figure 4-4: Future Year (2024) AM No Build Turning Movement Volumes 15 Figure 4-5: Future Year (2024) PM No Build Turning Movement Volumes 16 Figure 4-6: Future Year (2018) AM Phase I Turning Movement Volumes 21 Figure 4-7: Future Year (2018) PM Phase I Turning Movement Volumes 22 Figure 4-8: Future Year (2024) AM Phase ll Turning Movement Volume 23 Figure 4-9: Future Year (2024) PM Phase II Turning Movement Volume 24 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Mt Figure A-1: Existing (2015) AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes A-2 Figure A-2: Existing (2015) PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes A-3 Figure A-3: Residential Trip Distribution A-4 Figure A-4: Residential Trip Driveway Assignment A-5 Figure A-5: Future Year (2018) Residential Trip Assignment — AM Peak Hour A-6 Figure A-6: Future Year (2018) Residential Trip Assignment — PM Peak Hour A-7 Figure A-7: Future Year (2024) Residential Trip Assignment — AM Peak Hour A-8 Figure A-8: Future Year (2024) Residential Trip Assignment — PM Peak Hour A-9 Figure A-9: Future Year (2024) Office Trips Removed — AM Peak Hour A-10 Figure A-10: Future Year (2024) Office Trips Removed — PM Peak Hour A-11 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 AS( 1.0 BACKGROUND DLC Residential is proposing a residential redevelopment project for the site in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and West 66th Street. The site is currently occupied by two buildings and surface parking The Redevelopment Plan calls for implementation in phases. During Phase I, the 62,100 sq. ft. medical/office building located on the northeast section of the site (6550 York Avenue) will remain open; the other building on site (3250 West 66th Street) is currently only partially occupied and will be removed, replaced with 230 residential units and a combination of surface and secure parking supplied at a ratio of 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit. During Phase II, the 62,100 sq. ft. medical/office building will be removed and replaced with an additional 145 residential units and surface and secure parking, also at a ratio of 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit. During both phases, the existing right-in right-out driveway configuration will be preserved, providing access to both 66th Street as well as York Avenue. The connection to the local streets north of the site will also be preserved, allowing drivers to arrive and depart the site via 64 Street. The project location is shown in Figure 1-1, and the proposed site plan for the fully redeveloped site is shown in Figure 1-2. During the redevelopment of the site, the adjacent parcel (3316 West 66th Street) will remain open, and access to York Avenue from the site will be preserved. A shared parking agreement is currently in place between this building and the two buildings on the redevelopment site. In order to assess the potential impacts of a reduction in surface parking on the adjacent site, current parking demands at 3316 West 66th Street are discussed in the Parking Demand Memo, provided in the Appendix. CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION GOALS The following policies for transportation are included in Chapter 7 of the Edina Comprehensive Plan, Update 2008, adopted by the Edina City Council on December 2, 2008: Goal 1: Maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives. Goal 2: Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. Goal 3: Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina's environment and neighborhood quality of life. Goal 4: Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single-occupant vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicular trips and the use of alternative travel options. Goal 5: Ensure that all Edina's residents, workers, and visitors, including those with transportation disadvantages, have viable travel options. Goal 6: Promote a travel demand management program through a coordinated program of regulations, marketing, and provision of alternative travel options. Goal 7: Provide multiple travel options for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists, and rideshare users, as well as for drivers of private automobiles. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66L, and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 ii AS-2 Goal 8: Support attractive and high performance transit service and connections. Goal 9: Manage parking provision to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride-sharing (car pools and van pools), bicycle parking, and increased transit use. Goal 10: Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES This traffic and parking analysis details the proposed project, including the site's design, location, and access plan. It discusses existing and future parking demands, as well parking supply during each project phase. Future traffic conditions are discussed, and potential impacts of the residential redevelopment project are identified. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 DLC Residential - Edina •-•,Z io "' ,.. z '4,-4 ', AO" > ds -¼ o la o 2 A g U t.n \'°' F-,A''''1‘ \O a ,O5, 40 YO R K AV E S HERITAGE DR CO LO NY WA Y 64TH S T W XE R X E S A VE S 65TH 51W Site Boundary 65TH ST W Phase 1 o Phase 2 DR E W A VE S 66TH ST W Tc- SOUTHDALE CIR SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD XE RX E S A VE 5 67TH ST W KideP)>HOM Feet 0 175 350 Project Location 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 1-1: Project Location DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I vi Act- - COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE PHASE 2 POOL 8. TERRACE GREEN ROOF PHASE 2 BUILDING AMENITIES GREEN ROOF TERRACES PHASE 1 POOL 8 TERRACE DECK PHASE 1 BUILDING AMENITIES GREEN ROOF TERRACES El I Sketch Pim Review DLC RESIDEN I IAL 2015 August 12th RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH &YORK Edina, MN LEVEL 1 Figure 1-2: Site Plan DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 2.0 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN The site is located adjacent to Southdale Square as well as the Southdale Shopping Center. Sheridan Park is the nearest park, and Sheridan Hill Elementary School is within 1/2 mile of the site. There is a sidewalk along the length of the site, including the north side of W. 66th Street and the east side of York Avenue/Xerxes Avenue, with the exception of the short (75') right turn lane into the site from York Avenue. The intersection of W. 66th Street and York Avenue has marked crosswalks across all four legs, and pedestrian crossing pushbuttons in each quadrant. The intersection of W. 66th Street and the Southdale Shopping Center exit has a crosswalk on the east leg with pedestrian pushbuttons in the northeast and southeast quadrants. There is also a marked crosswalk on the south leg of the intersection of Xerxes Avenue and W. 64th Street. BICYCLE No marked bicycle facilities are available on W. 66th Street, York Avenue, or Xerxes Avenue. TRANSIT Four METRO Transit bus routes stop adjacent to the site. Three additional routes stop one block away from the site at the Southdale Shopping Center. Details for each route are provided below. On W. 66'h Street in the westbound direction, the rightmost lane is marked for "Bus Stopping and Right Turns Only," providing a transit advantage during times of congestion. ADJACENT ROUTES Route 6 • Type: Local Bus • Nearest Stop: 66th Street & York Avenue • Major Destinations: Southdale Center, Xerxes Ave, Uptown Transit Station, Downtown Minneapolis, University of Minnesota • Weekday Frequency: 4 to 15 minutes • Weekend Frequency: 15 minutes Route 515 • Type: Local Bus • Nearest Stop: 661h Street & Barrie Road • Major Destinations: Southdale Center, VA Medical Center Station, Mall of America Station Weekday Frequency: 15 to 30 minutes • Weekend Frequency: 15 to 30 minutes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66t, and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Route 578 • Type: Express Bus . Nearest Stop: 66th Street & York Avenue • Major Destinations: Southdale Center, 46th Street Station (I-35W), Downtown Minneapolis • Weekday Frequency: 30 minutes (peak hour only) • Weekend Frequency: - Route 579 • Type: Express Bus • Nearest Stop: 65th Street & Xerxes Avenue • Major Destinations: Southdale Center, 46th Street Station (I-35W), University of Minnesota • Weekday Frequency: 4 Northbound AM trips, 3 Southbound PM trips • Weekend Frequency: - NEARBY ROUTES Route 537 • Type: Local Bus • Nearest Stop: Southdale Transit Center • Major Destinations: Southdale Center, Normandale Community College • Weekday Frequency: 60 minutes • Weekend Frequency: - Route 538 • Type: Local Bus • Nearest Stop: Southdale Transit Center • Major Destinations: Southdale Center, Best Buy Headquarters, Southtown Shopping Center, Mall of America Station • Weekday Frequency: 30 minutes • Weekend Frequency: 30 to 60 minutes Route 684 . Type: Express Bus • Nearest Stop: Southdale Transit Center • Major Destinations: Chaska, Chanhassen, Southwest Station, Southdale Center, Downtown Minneapolis, University of Minnesota • Weekday Frequency: 10 Westbound AM trips, 6 Eastbound PM trips • Weekend Frequency: - DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 > I z :,i Ilry O DLC Residential - Edina o a o 0 z. u x S ,..‘ , / ..t‘ .‘ oiS 'Z' HERITAGE DR YO RK A VE S 64TH ST ,W te, ILI 65TH ST W 6611-151W SOUTHDALE CIR 67TH ST W ce 0, SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD 0 I CO L ON Y WA Y Ki"er>>11°rn Ommi== eet 0 175 350 F Transit Routes 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 2-1: Transit Routes Near the Site DLC Residential Redevelopment at 661h and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 451 3.0 PARKING Given the proposed phasing of development on site, a parking analysis was conducted in order to assess current demands, forecast future demands during Phase I, and confirm that the proposed parking supply will accommodate these demands. Based on field observations and a review of parking demand estimates from ITE and ULI, the proposed parking supply ratios are forecasted to adequately serve the parking demands for the office building on site as well as the office building on the adjacent site. Residential parking demand estimates were not included, but the proposed parking supply of 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit exceeds the minimum requirements for multifamily buildings in a Planned Commercial District under Edina's Code of Ordinances. A Parking Demand Memo, provided in the Appendix, documents the assumptions and recommendations in more detail, and the proposed parking stall counts and corresponding ratios are provided below. Phase I • 3250 Building - Removed • 6550 Building o Surface: 222 stalls o Secure: 28 stalls o Total: 250 stalls o Ratio: 4.03 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA • Phase I Residential o Surface: 29 stalls o Secure: 350 stalls o Total: 379 stalls o Ratio: 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit • Adjacent Site (3316 Building) o Surface: 140 stalls o 4.24 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Phase II • 6550 Building - Removed • Phase I Residential — No Change from Phase I • Phase II Residential o Surface: 9 stalls o Secure: 225 stalls o Total: 334 stalls o Ratio: 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit • Adjacent Site (3316 Building) — No Change from Phase I DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 4-5-1 4.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS An analysis of the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed residential redevelopment project was completed. The assumptions, methodology, results, and recommended improvements are detailed in this section. The following intersections were analyzed for traffic impacts: • West 66th Street and Southdale Shopping Center Exit • West 66 Street and 3316 West 66th Street West Access • West 66th Street and 3316 West 66th Street East Access • West 661h Street and York Avenue South • York Avenue South and 6550 York Avenue South Access • Xerxes Avenue South and West 64'h Street The traffic conditions at these intersections were analyzed under four scenarios during the morning and evening peak hours using Synchro 9 and SimTraffic 9: • Future Year (2018) No Build Conditions • Future Year (2018) Build Conditions — Phase I • Future Year (2024) No Build Conditions • Future Year (2024) Build Conditions — Phase II EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS West 66'h Street/County Round 53 is a four/five-lane east-west A-minor reliever arterial adjacent to the development site. Within the study area, the posted speed limit is 35 mph, and a median is present on both sides of York Avenue South. The 2014 annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume on West 66th Street east of York Avenue South was 14,700 vehicles per day, according to MnDOT's AADT map. On- street parking is prohibited, and within the five-lane segment between York Avenue South and France Avenue South/County Road 17, the rightmost lane in the westbound direction is marked for buses and right turning vehicles only. Both the access points on West 6641 Street included within the analysis are right-in right-out, and a median prevents left turns into or out of each access point. York Avenue South/Xerxes Avenue South/County Road 31 is a two-way north-south major collector street. Within the study area, the posted speed limit is 35 mph south of West 661h Street and 30 mph north of West 661h Street. A median is present on both sides of West 66th Street. The 2014 AADT on Xerxes Avenue south of Highway 62 was 17,300 vehicles per day, and the 2014 AADT on York Avenue south of West 66t1 Street was 22,000 vehicles per day, according to MnDOT's AADT map. Parking is allowed on both sides of Xerxes Avenue north of West 65th Street, but parking is prohibited south of West 65'h Street within the study area. The access point on York Avenue included within the analysis is right-in right-out, and a median prevents left turns into or out of the access point. The existing lane geometry and intersection control for each of the study intersections is provided in Figure 4-1. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES To analyze traffic operations at the six study intersections, turning movement counts were collected on Thursday, September 17, 2015 during both the morning and evening peak hours. The network peak hour of these six intersections was determined to occur from 7:45-8:45AM and from 4:45-5:45PM. The f!i) DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Mo average Peak Hour Factor (PHF) during these hours was calculated at 0.93 in the morning and 0.96 in the evening. Due to the number of access points and intersections within the study area not included within the analysis, traffic volumes were not balanced between intersections. Because all six intersections were counted simultaneously, the volume imbalance can be attributed to these access points. The 2015 Existing Turning Movement Counts for the morning and evening peak hours, rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles by movement, are provided in the Appendix in Figures A-1 and A-2. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 11(0) Traffic and Parking Analysis I vi AGI DLC Residential - Edina 0' 1 0 $ ., Z in ,Ikl- <C 0 0 2. U 3\1' L'.1 ..•C''' Gt ' kiV 10- stO JA$ S c,,<,i4 kg'„„ CO L ON Y WA Y HERITAGE DR YO RK A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH ST 0 I I I 5 ...,,,, I / #1- ._ <_ , <— • „... <— .1 <-- . ••'" riY wir, —3 4 • Ii SOUTHDALE CIR T SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD xo 67TH ST W ce IL 64TTST W• r X ER X E S A VE S DR E W A VE S <—B115 66TH ST W Kimley>>>Horn 00 175 350 Feet Exisiting Lane Geometry 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-1: Existing (2015) Lane Geometry DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I vi BACKGROUND GROWTH AND FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In order to analyze traffic operations in future years, the 2015 peak hour turning movement volumes were grown using an annual exponential background growth rate of 0.5 percent. Because traffic volumes in the area decreased between 2011 and 2014, this rate was determined based on discussions with the City of Edina. The Phase I analysis year was assumed to be one year following opening of Phase 1(2017), resulting in an analysis year of 2018. The 2018 background traffic for this future No Build scenario, rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles by movement, is provided in Figures 4-2 through 4-3. The Phase II analysis year was assumed to be one year following opening of Phase 11(2023), resulting in an analysis year of 2024. The 2024 background traffic volumes for this future No Build scenario, rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles by movement, are provided in Figures 4-4 through 4-5. No geometric modifications or other changes were assumed between existing conditions (2015) and the future No Build analysis years. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 XE R X E S A VE S HERITAGE DR *-30 Rots" +10 64TH ST W 405:. 15,k 65TH ST W 65TH ST W 66TH ST W DR E W A VE S I I . 1 i r. 1 „sg, ;722 le ee, I 1,55 1,0 / +1070 *1040 fl'• 4 '.1 :140./ ,.,3 c5 _ 240* 240+ CO , 35-0 165+ 2 35-* q' • SOUTHDALE CIR 350+ > SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD 67TH ST W In C OL ON Y WA Y YO RK A VE S DLC Residential - Edina ,C 0 Z 0 2 0 V Kimley>>>Horn 00_175 350 lo Feet AM 2018 No Build 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-2: Future Year (2018) AM No Build Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 DLC Residential - Edina cp; 7 13 0 a -o -1 r 40- 5" ds ¢ 0 a ,r Z 0 s C, ....,I S C...' n"1, %CDC. cie,,,2• • 4'‘ 81 . P- <<, ,‘-‘° kg' CO L ON Y WA Y 65TH ST W 65TH ST W In I I c. I .Pdsv 4-JP/ c.< ot\V!Iit / s.4.74412528 "0 re "5 "" CO 4-845 4-780 'Ai .1.e. .c, Tr . cr N 220-0 700+ 1020+ r., cvm 995+ 995+ Oh 75,k SOUTHDALE CIR > Sz cc SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD K..' • 67TH ST W xt" XE R X ES A VE 5 DR E W A VE S 66TH ST V,/ HERITAGE DR Y OR K A VE S "60 •12 4-5 * r15 64TH ST W 3°1 5. g.13.6 25-* KIIMIer>)FlOrn () Feet 0 175 350 PM 2018 No Build 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-3: Future Year (2018) PM No Build Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 IN!, DR E W A VE S DLC Residential - Edina 01 ro 7 .20 0 a -6 r stl- < 0 a •< 0 z -1/4 Z 0 .e Lu \krk-k A, stO ..f,5 o P. e- ks" \-\ CO L O NY WA Y 65TH ST W 65TH ST W 49,1. f .9..4:9 SOUTHDALE OR SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD ;', 67TH ST W ce HERITAGE OR Y OR K A VE S o +10 ±,1 4-15 61D-1 ST W 40-7 g 5+ 15-4 `nl XE R X E S A VE S / 4-795 *-0 '*-0 *-45 p240 +1105 " 4- I1070 +1070 "K" • 66TH ST W 360+ g 245+ 245+ on 350 175+ 35-+L rider>) FlOrn o 175 35 F 0 AM 2024 No Build 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-4: Future Year (2024) AM No Build Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 X ER X E S A V E S DLC Residential - Edina ,r1 ro 7 HERITAGE DR ir> 0 a -* .1 r 5 d' -( o g ‘z o x -n z 0 1.1 s&d' ,IC5 SI''‘'4 34A -.kb. ,oq, %\41 ,ri`b s ,C\ 0,,,V' 1,65 7 T SZ ;15 qq". 63401'41ST W 5+ qtt34 25-4 - 65TH ST W r"" - -1 65TH ST W Y O RK A VE S CO L O NY WA Y D RE W A VE S 4-J **'n $.2% ot:\40% fele ..90 804 / ,fsb+52 *-0 5"0 4 ,„ 4-870 +805 " 4- 1,-5 66TH ST W 1050+ &.4 1025+ 1025+ 225-% A 720+ 80-* Nit17,•• SOUTHDALE CIR IC .f) >- SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD r<ut 67TH ST W Ki"er>>H°rn 0 eet F O_ 175 35 PM 2024 No Build 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-5: Future Year (2024) PM No Build Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION I TRIP GENERATION Trip Generation estimates were developed based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 9th Edition. As these values represent estimates, all values were rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles. I Phase I During Phase I, the 3250 Building (3250 W. 66th Street) and adjacent parking will be replaced with a 230- unit, 6-floor apartment building with secure parking. The existing 6550 Building (6550 York Avenue South) and associated surface parking will remain open, along with the existing access locations on both York Avenue South and W. 66th Street. The apartment building is most similar to ITE's Land Use 223 ("Mid-Rise Apartment"), and this land use code was therefore used for developing trip generation estimates: "Mid-rise apartments are apartments (rental dwelling units) in rental buildings that have between three and 10 levels (floors)." For both the morning and evening peak demand estimates, the rates associated with the peak hours of adjacent street traffic were used. Due to the relatively small sample size (seven studies), the average rate rather than the fitted curve equations were used for both time periods. Although some vehicles were observed parked near the 3250 building at the time of the counts, the building was largely vacant, and no trips were removed from the network for the future year analyses to account for the removal of this building. Additionally, because the 6550 Building was assumed to remain open during Phase I, the existing entries and exits from site driveways were preserved for the future analysis years. Although some degree of internal capture could be expected by co-locating a residential building on the same site as an office building, this would result in a reduction of less than 4 percent of trips according to ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, and no internal capture was assumed within the trip generation analysis. The total net new trips added to the network for the Phase I analysis year for both the morning and evening peak periods is provided in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. Table 4-1: Morning Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase I Code Land Use Description Units No. Rate AM AM Trips Enter (%) AM Trips Exit (%) AM Trips Enter AM Trips Exit Total AM Trips 223 Mid-Rise Apartment DUs 230 0.30 31% 69% 20 50 70 20 50 70 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Table 4-2: Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase I Code Land Use Description Units No. Rate PM PM Trips Enter (%) PM Trips Exit (%) PM Trips Enter PM Trips Exit Total PM Trips 223 Mid-Rise Apartment DUs 230 0.39 58% 42% 50 40 90 50 40 90 Phase Il During Phase II, the 6550 Building (6550 York Avenue South) and adjacent parking will be replaced with a 145-unit 5-floor apartment building with additional secure parking. Upon completion of Phase II, the site will have a total of 375 apartment units, 38 surface stalls, and 576 secure parking stalls. As with Phase I, the average trip generation rates were used, applied to the completed residential development. The removal of the 6550 Building will lead to a significant reduction in the number of trips observed traveling to and from the site under existing conditions. At the time of the turning movement counts, the 62,100 sq. ft. office was approximately 71 percent occupied. Therefore, 44,100 sq. ft. was used to estimate the number of trips to remove from the network for the Phase II analysis. Due to the variety of uses observed within the building, ITE's Land Use 710 ("General Office Building") was used for developing trip generation estimates: "A general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building or buildings may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers and tenant services, such as a bank or savings and loan institution, a restaurant or cafeteria and service retail facilities." The average rate rather than the fitted curve equations produced estimates most similar to observed driveway entries and exits, and this rate was therefore used for both time periods to estimate the number of trips to remove. The total net new trips added to the network for the Phase II analysis year for both the morning and evening peak periods, including the removed office trips, is provided in Tables 4-3 and 4-4. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I vi Table 4-3: Morning Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase II Code Land Use Description Units No. Rate AM AM Trips Enter (%) AM Trips Exit (%) AM Trips Enter AM Trips Exit Total AM Trips 223 Mid-Rise Apartment DUs 375 0.30 31% 69% 35 80 115 710 General Office Building (1) 1ksf 44.1 1.56 88% 12% -60 -10 -70 -25 70 45 Table 4-4: Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase II Code Land Use Description Units No. Rate PM PM Trips Enter (%) PM Trips Exit (%) TPriMps Enter TPriMps Exit Total Trips 223 Mid-Rise Apartment DUs 375 0.39 58% 42% 85 60 145 710 General Office Building (1) lksf 44.1 1.49 17% 83% -10 -55 -65 75 5 80 Due to the removal of the office trips, trips entering the site during the morning peak hour represents a reduction from existing conditions, and trips exiting the site during the evening peak hour is only expected to increase by five vehicles. The greatest change in trips assigned to the network compared to existing conditions is associated with the residential trips exiting the site in the morning, and the residential trips returning to the site during the evening. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Residential Trips The trip distribution for the site-generated residential is shown in the Appendix in Figure A-3. This distribution is based on the current traffic patterns in the area as well as the driveway configuration and likely routing to and from the freeways in the area (Highway 62,1-35W, Highway 100, and 1-494), as described below: • To/From the North (Xerxes Avenue) o Inbound: 65% o Outbound: 40% • Approximately 5 U-turns were observed at 66th Street and York Avenue on the southbound approach under existing conditions. For assignment purposes, it is assumed that approximately 20% of northbound trips (8% of total) will make a U- turn at 66th Street and 80% (32% of total) will take York Avenue to 64th Street and make left turn onto Xerxes Avenue to depart to the north. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 kb • To/From the West (West 66th Street) o Inbound: 5% • Trips from the west and southwest are most likely to arrive via Highway 62 and Xerxes Avenue as opposed to 66th Street from the west given the site driveway configuration and proximity to Highway 62. A negligible number of U-turns were observed on the eastbound approach to York Ave (1 or 2 during the peak hour), so 5% is assumed to capture the drivers that may choose to make this movement to access the site. o Outbound: 25% ▪ Due to the right-in right-out driveway configuration, some drivers will choose to proceed west and access Highway 62 from France Avenue, even if headed north or east. • To/From the East (West 66th Street) o Inbound: 20% o Outbound: 25% • Due to the right-in right-out driveway configuration, some drivers will choose to turn left onto 66th Street to access I-35W, even if headed north. • To/From the South (York Avenue) o Inbound: 10% o Outbound: 10% The corresponding site driveway assignment is shown in Figure A-4. Although approximately 35 percent of inbound trips are assumed to use the right in from 66th Street, all southbound, eastbound, and westbound outbound trips were assigned to the York Avenue driveway due to the site configuration and proximity of the secure parking access relative to this driveway. Maps showing the site-generated residential trips for the morning and evening peak hours for both Phase I (2018) and Phase 11 (2024) are provided in Figures A-5 through A-8. Office Trips Phase II includes the removal of the 6550 Building (6550 York Avenue South), and office trips therefore need to be removed from the network to analyze the full build scenario. The removed office trips are shown in Figures A-9 and A-10, generated using a proportional reduction of the office trips identified in Tables 4-3 and 4-3 based on existing traffic patterns. FUTURE BUILD TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Taking into account the trip assignment described above as well as the reduction of office trips for Phase II, the estimated Full Build morning and evening peak hour turning movements for both Phase I and Phase II are shown in Figures 4-6 through 4-9. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 ;'2f01 Traffic and Parking Analysis I vi DLC Residential - Edina ciprr "3 0 .1 :5 Cis Q 0 a (5 Z (.) \4's' ..‘0 •Z's ,o0 stAV Ak''' o P <<, (cC"'?- C OL ON Y WA Y HERITAGE DR YO R K A VE S 65TH 51W 65TH ST W 66TH ST W DR E W A VE S a I I 6"<0.5•49. I Lt ,1 4'rV I d''' / *4-S5 *-0 V I *-50 03 43, r-235 +1080 • +1050 I • tan ' • CS 350+ 1g 240+ 240+ Ob 35% 0 165+ SOUTHDALE CIR YO RK A VE S SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD 67TH ST W Ui XE R X ES A VE S *-30 TS..4 +10 64TH ST W 15-4 ‘,4 Kimlep)Horn 00 175 350 Eimm=] Feet AM 2018 Build 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-6: Future Year (2018) AM Phase I Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 *-60 00 Sn 4-5 71'T; 4-15 64T11 ST W 45 D.16 25-* XE R X ES A VE S DR E W A VE S 66TH ST W DLC Residential - Edina es Vir -0 o 0 1 ¢ 0 brt' 0 x 1 Z 0 ', •20‘ 1,s 1k) q:\° ci",2•4 ..k b 04 ,\ atksb S P <e, 0 ÷ ,(13' C OL ON Y W A Y HERITAGE DR Y O RK A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH St e, I 49N-5, n 11/ < *-0 4-855 % " +790 / ill *4--ih, r 1-495 41,280 •' co Ga u, 1025+ ,!,„ 1000+ 1000+ 5.t v rg el 220-° . tk 0 700* a.. 75-* 4:4*, %til_4* SOUTHDALE CIR SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD tlx 67TH ST W cc Ki"er)>H°rn 0 n 11=1 eet 0 175 350 F PM 2018 Build 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-7: Future Year (2018) PM Phase I Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 661h and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 DLC Residential - Edina (V /3 o A a p,N\ Ab 4\ 0 9- •Z" b 9:‘ ./N\'14'k ,tk'' -N<(•5 N.- <6 ÷.0 e < 0 2 i'., 0 2 0 CO LO NY WA Y HERITAGE DR Y OR K A VE S 65TH ST W r- — — 65TH ST W O I Ic4 Lu E tlz, ZKSS ce I < ..%‘;nPc.,5 xV on ,/ +795 *43 *-45 0,1-240 4-1120 7* +1085 is I 4-1086 /q5 DR E W A VE S 66TH ST W 360+ 1,/, 245+ 245+ Ot 35-175+ 35-4 SOUTHDALE CIR >- SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD x1.`21 67TH ST W 1,30 4-10 l t (w-15 64111 ST W 65-* gUrer, 15-4 XE R X E S A V E S Kimley>>>Horn Oct 175 350 Feet AM 2024 Build 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-8: Future Year (2024) AM Phase ll Turning Movement Volume DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 0"," 73 0 9'6 1 DLC Residential - Edina HERITAGE DR a o a CD 2 1" Z V , Gt ' If.V -,0 e-V‘ ,,•2`-14-k P- 0-65 kg" C, ‘-' .0-5 e- 64_11 ST W 355: P.U6 25-* 65TH ST W 65TH ST W I I 0 I Ice cc I 4#4')9:5' AV < Act:0 cc, I 4) / 1-515 * rp,290 .870 o• +805 ris C4105, , ..t• co 66TH ST W Y OR K A VE S CO L ON Y WA Y DR E W A VE S XE R X E S A V E S 1055. Ng 1030-0 1030-0 55 225-0 720. 80-* ‘K- . 47j4,, NO3'4? SOUTHDALE CIR L>' Se SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD Kimley>>>Horn 00 175 350 Feet PM 2024 Build 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure 4-9: Future Year (2024) PM Phase ll Turning Movement Volume DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 1435- DELAY AND QUEUING ANALYSIS RESULTS Models of each scenario were developed using Synchro, and then delay and queuing were evaluated for each scenario using the average output value from five simulations in SimTraffic. The Future Year (2018 and 2024) No Build scenarios were analyzed first to provide an understanding of delay and queuing including background traffic growth, before the addition of trips generated by residential development. The Future Year (2018) Phase I Build scenario was analyzed to determine the potential impact of Phase I site traffic on the adjacent study intersections, including all existing office trips from the site. The Future Year (2024) Phase II Build scenario was analyzed to determine the potential impact of Phase II site traffic on the adjacent study intersections, including additional residential trips but accounting for the reduction of office trips. 2018 NO BUILD RESULTS All intersections operate at a level of service (LOS) D or better under the 2018 No Build Conditions scenario, as shown in the Appendix in Table B-1. Two movements exceed the LOS D threshold during the PM peak hour at 66th Street and York Avenue. Both the northbound and southbound left turns at 66th Street and York Avenue have delays in excess of 55 seconds. However, these delays are very close to the DIE threshold, and delays in this range can be expected given the 130-second cycle length. Additionally, while the eastbound through movement at 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue slightly exceeds the 35-second threshold during the PM peak hour, this is a very low volume movement (5 vehicles) and subject to significant random variability as a result. No significant queuing issues are expected during either peak hour, as shown in Table B-2. On the northbound approach to 66th Street and York Avenue, left turn queues are projected to reach the limit of the storage lanes, and in some cases queues in the through lanes can be expected to block entrance into the turn lanes. No significant upstream blockage is expected, however. Queues on the southbound approach can also be expected to block entrance to the turn lane during some cycles, but this will not lead to significant delays. 2018 PHASE I BUILD RESULTS With the construction of 230 residential units on site during Phase I, all intersections are expected to continue to operate at a level of service (LOS) D or better as shown in the appendix in Table B-3. Average intersection delay at 66th Street and York Avenue is expected to remain approximately equivalent to the No Build condition. At 66th Street and York Avenue, the eastbound U-turn movement at 66th Street and York Avenue is estimated to serve 5 vehicles during the PM peak hour, and while this low volume movement is subject significant random variability, some vehicles making this movement to access the site may encounter delays of 60 seconds or more. No other movements at this intersection are expected to have a significant increase in average delay compared to the No Build condition. Additionally, while the westbound left and through movements at 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue are estimated exceed the D/E threshold under the PM peak hour Build scenario, these movements are also very low volume, serving 15 and 5 vehicle, respectively. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 No significant changes in queue spillback or lane blockage are expect under the Phase I Build scenario compared to the No Build condition, as shown in Table B-4. 2024 NO BUILD RESULTS All intersections operate at a level of service (LOS) D or better under the 2024 No Build Conditions scenario, as shown in the Appendix in Table B-5. Average intersection delay at 66th Street and York Avenue is expected to increase by one second overall compared to the 2018 No Build Condition as a result of background traffic growth. As in the 2018 No Build scenario, both the northbound and southbound left turns at 66th Street and York Avenue have delays very close to the D/E threshold of 55 seconds during the PM peak hour, but a significant increase in delay for these movements is not expected. No other movements are expected to exceed the D/E threshold, and some of the observed delay reductions at 64th Street and York Avenue between 2018 and 2024 are simply attributable to random variability of the very low volume movements. No significant changes in queue spillback or lane blockage are expect under the 2024 No Build scenario compared to the 2018 No Build condition, as shown in Table B-6. 2024 PHASE II BUILD RESULTS With the construction of 145 additional residential units on site during Phase II and the removal of the 6550 office building, all intersections are expected to continue to operate at a level of service (LOS) D or better as shown in the appendix in Table B-7. Average intersection delay at 661h Street and York Avenue is expected to remain approximately equivalent to the 2024 No Build condition. As in the 2024 No Build scenario, both the northbound and southbound left turns at 66th Street and York Avenue, as well as the U-turn movements, have delays very close to the D/E threshold of 55 seconds during the PM peak hour, but a significant increase in delay for these movements is not expected. No significant changes in queue spillback or lane blockage are expect under the Phase II Build scenario compared to the No Build condition, as shown in Table B-8. RECOMMENDATIONS It is anticipated that the existing area lane geometry will be adequate to support future traffic growth and the addition of site traffic at the area study intersections. No geometry or operations improvements are recommended at this time to support the residential redevelopment project. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 477 5.0 APPENDIX A. Supplemental Exhibits B. Level of Service Results and Queue Projections C. SimTraffic Results D. Parking Demand Memo DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I vi APPENDIX A: SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS • 1,30 4-10 iI 415 64TH ST W 4o-* 5+ 15‘ XE R X ES A VE S 345+ 1dt, 1025+ 235+0 35-0 165+ 35-* 4./ •<. •r . 9 66TH ST W • ks, 4tcg 'qs7^ DLC Residential - Edina .i.l. 0, 0 -'- 1 5 CP -¢- 0 a •,< 0 Z0 •10- ,, •It:' •c. \C' -n‘' 9-1'' •L• fil ,e- '2,st4' ,10 Y O RK A VE S HERITAGE DR C OL ON Y WA Y DR E W A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH ST W O I Ice co Ix I < ..., o•sis,A co ,,,,., +1`CI235 / 15111 144+10525 :f 4k- 1 -*-14:1 0 32 *-4-91055 SOUTHDALE CIR SI 9- SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD tol OT 67TH ST W Kimler>>Horn 175 350 Feet AM 2015 Existing Turns 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-1: Existing (2015) AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 YO RK A VE S 1'0 4-830 1005-* 1g fg 980-* 980* Ot 215-• 690-* 75.* ,\C,4 nn -85 / 4.480 .475 D RE W A VE S 6611-1ST W r•-•-ia 541 " 4-770 DLC Residential - Edina HERITAGE DR 0 U 36-"s v.‘C" •2' t's 1,60 .4s if, C OL O NY WA Y 641 „ H S T W 5* 25 -A XE R X E S A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH ST W SOUTHDALE CIR 0 c n < 67TH ST W f x P w e,•29 • ) - n 4 L u x < % 0 >9. le, SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD li, Kimley*Horn 00 175 350 n =1Feet PM 2015 Existing Turns 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-2: Existing (2015) PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66t1- and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 <c' DLC Residential - Edina • • • ••• • •• • 3: • • 2%. a, 8% • • • • • • a • • • • • • • II • is II I I 4" • •st / iciolim EI .I• /-*4111,023 10*/ 11 All % j< n INEn ohn ) is • • • • • • • • • • or 11n 4 25% 101 10% tKimler 0 )>Horn m=73 ee 0 sn 175 35 F Residential Trip Distribution 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-3: Residential Trip Distribution DLC Residential Redevelopment at 661h and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Airc Kimley»)Horn 00 43.75 87.50 'Feet Residential Trip Driveway Assignment 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-4: Residential Trip Driveway Assignment DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 A-5ra, HERITAGE DR Y OR K A VE S XE RX E S A VE S DLC Residential - Edina Gol 0, y \ xot, 5 d' a o 0 z u Akt' •20‘ e 4, ,0 .z, sx,,,,ko .00 .tos ., t (<, o ÷ 413- 65TH ST W 65TH ST W CO L ON Y W A Y DR E W A VE S *-0 66TH ST W .010 0-• 1g 0-‘ SOUTHDALE CIR SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD ul 67TH ST W tKimleMiorn 0 0 175 35 ee F Figure A-5: Future Year (2018) Residential Trip Assignment — AM Peak Hour AM 2018 Residential Trips 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Note: Due to the rounding convention and limited number of trips, approximately 50 percent of outbound trips depart to the north in this scenario after balancing and rounding. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Y OR K A VE S XE RX E S A V E S • + ▪ 10 5n1 0 / 1:102 • CO ".0 +10 4-110 DLC Residential - Edina c.1 -o a 5 ct < 0 •Z 0 Z A Z 0 '20se pe• A-k.. ,.\0 •Z'`'- •I'0.'k -4° P" <4, 0 ÷ V' 0 C OL O N Y WA Y HERITAGE DR D RE W A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH ST W I I . . I ,9I . . le'c' 66TH ST W 5÷ 34. 0.% 0÷ • „9 SOUTHDALE CIR (c!) >- SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD XE R XE S AV E S 67TH ST W Kimley>>>Horn 00 in 175 350 Feet PM 2018 Residential Trips 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-6: Future Year (2018) Residential Trip Assignment — PM Peak Hour DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Avi• 1,0 .71% .478 64TLJ ST W 2S-, 0,1 o+ XE R X ES A V E S DLC Residential - Edina 7 '70 r- •O' 5 x \ < o t c 1 ' •R o S A Z U SO' it ,AstO 0 S •Ile6 ' S V' k, 6 ,÷ ‹V CO LO NY WA Y HERITAGE DR YO R K A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH ST W DR E W A VE S n -o 66TH ST W 4-20 on. ,17,14e SOUTHDALECIR , -.n• , e- ,..i\ L. 50 > < 'Po SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD Kimley>>>Horn 00 175 350 Feet AM 2024 Residential Trips 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-7: Future Year (2024) Residential Trip Assignment — AM Peak Hour DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 641F1 ST W 20-7 0,1 o÷ XE R X E S A VE S DLC Residential - Edina 14, 7 ' .70 , 0 , .L 0 0 x -lbl' 61 Z 0 1, `g3' •I'S 1. Gt l' N4 -kb e -44 .2, -0 -i* ,s-‘ <1- ' CO L O NY WA Y HERITAGE DR YO R K A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH ST W DR E W A VE S *-0 ig 4-15 *45 I l 6671-1ST W U./ 5-* 0-0 .9 it SOUTHDALE OR SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD r, 677H ST W ce Kimley>>>Horn 0 on 175 350 iiFeet PM 2024 Residential Trips 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-8: Future Year (2024) Residential Trip Assignment — PM Peak Hour DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 ;013 640 ST W O XE RX E S A VE S 11°. +5 lg Als 4-5 1 I 4-5 • 0-0 0+ • 0-* o c, co a i ,hp 7,4 •A/ DR E W A VE S 66TH ST W DLC Residential - Edina Vs% 73 , 0 \ ;9' 5 ¢ 0 bq- •P 0 Z 0 Skl- ..ik ,,,i' „AO ,' ,Oz <cc` ÷ r CO LO NY WA Y HERITAGE DR Y OR K A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH ST W SOUTHDALE OR 0 q- 0<<" -4\ 5 "0—e- ,Y6 Ps e tu > < JO ,, &,0 3 , SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD X ER X E S A VE S 67TH ST W Kimley>>>Horn 00 175 350 Feet AM 2024 Office Trips 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-9: Future Year (2024) Office Trips Removed — AM Peak Hour DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 A-67 DR E W A VE S X() 4.15 66TH ST W DLC Residential - Edina Y‘ HERITAGE DR Y OR K A VE S CO L O NY WA Y XE R X E S A VE S 65TH ST W 65TH ST W 0. - - - " f'\6c,y 4 • +15 .0" go ,ary e 0* 0k 0.° • on. Qlzt SOUTHDALE OR SOUTHDALE CUB FOODS RD XE R X E S A VE S 67TH ST W Kinnlep>Horn 00 175 350 in 'Feel PM 2024 Office Trips 66th St. W. & York Ave. S. Figure A-10: Future Year (2024) Office Trips Removed — PM Peak Hour DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Aids* APPENDIX B: LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS AND QUEUE PROJECTIONS Table B-1: 2018 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary- AM and PM Peak Hour Delay 2018 SimTraffic Summary - AM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection U-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB - 0.9 A - 1.4 A WB - - - 1.2 A NB 25.4 C 4.3 A SB W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB 0.3 A WB - - 0.6 A NB - - SB 3.0 A W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB 0.6 A - WB - 2.7 A 1.9 A NB - - - - - SB - 3.8 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB - 40.0 D 25.5 C 1.7 A 23.6 C WB 35.5 D 34.4 C 20.9 C 3.5 A NB 32.9 C 34.0 C 24.3 C 2.5 A SB 37.5 D 27.9 C 1.3 A York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - - 2.9 A - WB - - - - NB 2.4 A SB 0.4 A 0.4 A Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB - - 15.5 C 13.7 B _ 4.7 A - WB 11.7 B 15.2 C 4.6 A NB 9.1 A 5.9 A 0.4 A 0.4 A SB - 2.8 A 0.4 A 0.3 A 2018 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection U-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB 5.6 A - 6.6 A WB - - 4.7 A NB 24.6 C 9.2 A SB - W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB 1.5 A WB - 0.5 A NB - SB - 2.6 A W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB - 3.0 A WB - - 2.4 A 1.5 A NB - - - SB - 3.3 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB - 53.4 D 38.5 D 1.8 A 35.2 D WB - 50.0 D 33.7 C 3.6 A NB 56.0 E 35.4 D 3.2 A SB 46.1 D 56.9 E 35.6 D 3.0 A York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - 3.8 A WB - - NB 3.1 A - SB - - 0.5 A 0.4 A Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 24.5 C 35.3 E 8.7 A WB 28.8 D 31.7 D 13.3 B NB - 5.9 A 1.7 A 1.5 A 5B 12.2 B 0.4 A 0.1 A DLC Residen ial Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Table B-2: 2018 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary— AM and PM Peak Hour Queuin 2018 SimTraffic Summary - AM No Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right Storage 95th % Storage 95th % Storage 95th % EB 350 35 WB 250 65 W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal NB 250 65 200 35 SB EB 400 0 WB 250 250 0 W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC NB SB 100 25 EB 650 10 WB 225 15 225 10 W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC NB SB 100 25 EB 400 50 875 90 300 0 WB 300 150 700 230 300 0 W 66th St & York Ave Signal NB 250 115 375 120 200 0 SB 250 30 700 80 100 70 EB 100 30 WB York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC NB 200 0 SB 450 0 75 0 EB 400 55 400 55 400 55 WB 300 55 300 55 300 55 Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC NB 250 40 600 0 600 0 SB 200 20 800 0 800 0 2018 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Queuing Queue Length by Movement Intersection Control Approach Left Through Right Storage 95th % Storage 95th % Storage 95th % EB 350 155 WB 250 175 W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal NB 250 110 200 90 SB EB 400 5 WB 250 5 250 0 W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC NB SB 100 35 EB 650 100 WB 225 10 225 10 W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC NB SB 100 20 EB 400 145 875 260 300 0 WB 300 205 700 210 300 0 W 66th St & York Ave Signal NB 250 170 375 290 200 0 SB 250 70 700 150 100 80 EB 100 35 WB York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC NB 200 5 SB 450 5 75 0 EB 400 65 400 65 400 65 WB 300 75 300 75 300 75 Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC NB 250 40 600 10 600 5 SB 200 40 800 5 800 5 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 la A-411 Table B-3: Phase 1(2018) Build Conditions - AM and PM Peak Hour Delay 2018 SimTraffic Summary - AM Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection U-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) veh) Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB - 0.9 A 1.5 A WB - 1.4 A NB - 27.3 C 3.9 A SB - - W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB - 0.3 A WB - 0.6 A NB SB - 2.8 A W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB - 0.6 A WB - 2.9 A 2.0 A NB - SB - - 3.7 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB 38.5 D 24.2 C 1.7 A 23.3 C WB 30.8 C 35.0 C 20.5 C 3.2 A NB 32.7 C 33.8 C 25.0 C 2.6 A SB 42.8 D 38.2 D 27.9 C 1.2 A York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB 3.4 A - WB - NB - 2.4 A - SB - - 0.4 A 0.5 A Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 16.0 C 22.2 C 7.6 A WB - 13.9 B 16.6 C 4.6 A NB 7.3 A 6.7 A 0.5 A 0.2 A SB 3.2 A 0.4 A 0.4 A 2018 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection U-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (seaveh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB 5.8 A 6.5 A WB - 4.9 A - NB - 23.5 C 7.7 A SB - W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB 1.5 A WB - 0.6 A NB - SB - - 3.4 A W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB - 2.5 A WB - 2.5 A 1.8 A NB - - - SB 4.5 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB 65.4 E 53.6 D 38.4 D 1.8 A 35.8 D WB 50.4 D 34.8 C 3.5 A NB 53.7 D 37.4 D 3.3 A SB 50.3 D 57.9 E 36.0 D 2.9 A York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB 4.0 A WB - - - NB - 3.2 A SB - 0.5 A 0.4 A Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 34.9 D 39.7 E 15.2 C - WB - 40.7 E 41.9 E 16.1 C NB 6.4 A 1.7 A 1.9 A SB 10.0 A 0.4 A 0.2 A DLC Residen ial Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 iW Table 8-4: Phase 1(2018) Build Conditions— AM and PM Peak Hour Queuin 2018 SimTraffic Summary - AM Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right Storage 95th % Storage 95th % Storage 95th % EB 350 40 WB 250 90 W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal NB 250 60 200 30 SB EB 400 0 WB 250 0 250 0 W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC NB SB 100 25 EB 650 10 WB 225 20 225 15 W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC NB SB 100 25 EB 400 45 875 85 300 0 WB 300 150 700 215 300 0 W 66th St & York Ave Signal NB 250 125 375 120 200 0 SB 250 45 700 80 100 75 EB 100 30 WB York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC NB 200 10 SB 450 0 75 0 EB 400 60 400 60 400 60 WB 300 55 300 55 300 55 Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC NB 250 40 600 0 600 0 SB 200 20 800 5 800 5 2018 SimTraffic Summary - PM Build Queuing Queue Length by Movement Intersection Control Approach Left Through Right Storage 95th % Storage 95th % Storage 95th % EB 350 165 WB 250 165 W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal NB 250 100 200 75 SB EB 400 0 WB 250 0 250 0 W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC NB SB 100 40 EB 650 80 WB 225 15 225 5 W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC NB SB 100 20 EB 400 145 875 255 300 0 WB 300 200 700 220 300 0 W 66th St & York Ave Signal NB 250 205 375 320 200 0 SB 250 100 700 145 100 80 EB 100 35 WB York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC NB 200 15 SB 450 0 75 25 EB 400 90 400 90 400 90 WB 300 90 300 90 300 90 Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC NB 250 45 600 10 600 10 SB 200 35 800 5 800 5 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 M3 Table 8-5: 2024 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary- AM and PM Peak Hour Delay 2024 SimTraffic Summary - AM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection U-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB 1.2 A 1.9 A WB - 1.7 A NB - 33.6 C 3.7 A SB - - W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB - 0.4 A - WB - - 0.6 A NB - - SB - 2.7 A W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB 0.7 A - WB - 2.9 A 2.1 A NB - SB - 6.0 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB 40.7 D 24.9 C 1.8 A 23.2 C WB 27.2 C 32.5 C 20.7 C 3.3 A NB 27.7 C 33.1 C 22.8 C 2.6 A SB - 41.2 D 29.8 C 1.0 A York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - 3.1 A WB - - NB - 2.4 A - SB - 0.4 A 0.4 A Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 16.8 C 18.9 C 6.0 A WB - 16.6 C 16.5 C 5.6 A NB 12.5 13 7.3 A 0.5 A 0.5 A SB - 3.5 A 0.4 A 0.3 A 2024 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection U-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB - 6.1 A 7.2 A WB - - 5.7 A - NB 24.3 C 9.0 A SB _ _ W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB - 1.7 A - WB - 0.6 A NB - - SB - - 4.1 A W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB - 3.2 A - WB 2.4 A 1.7 A NB - SB - 4.3 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB - 54.4 D 39.2 D 1.8 A 36.2 D WB - 51.9 D 33.3 C 3.4 A NB 54.6 D 39.1 D 3.3 A SB 52.9 D 56.9 E 38.1 D 3.4 A York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - 4.4 A WB - - NB - 3.4 A SB - - 0.5 A 0.2 A Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 27.6 D 33.4 D 8.7 A WB 31.3 D 29.2 D 13.2 B NB 7.5 A 1.7 A 1.7 A SB 13.0 B 0.4 A 0.3 A DLC Residen ial Redevelopment at 66th and Yo k I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Table B-6: 2024 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summa — AM and PM Peak Hour Queuin 2024 SimTraffic Summary - AM No Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right Storage 95th % Storage 95th % Storage 95th % W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB - 350 50 WB - 250 95 NB 250 70 200 40 SB - - - W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB - - 400 o WB - 250 o 250 o NB - SB - - 100 20 W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB - 650 10 - WB - 225 15 225 5 NB - - - SB 100 25 W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB 400 50 875 85 300 o WB 300 155 700 230 300 o NB 250 115 375 115 200 o SB 250 35 700 70 100 75 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - 100 30 WB - - NB - 200 o - SB - 450 o 75 o Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 400 55 400 55 400 55 WB 300 60 300 60 300 60 NB 250 40 600 10 600 o SB 200 25 800 o 800 o 2024 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right Storage 95th % Storage 95th % Storage 95th % W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB - 350 165 - WB 250 195 NB 250 110 - 200 85 SB - - W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB 400 5 - WB 250 o 250 o NB - - - SB - 100 40 W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB - - 650 115 - WB - 225 15 225 10 NB - - - SB - - 100 20 W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB 400 140 875 260 300 o WB 300 210 700 225 300 0 NB 250 190 375 340 200 0 SB 250 80 700 160 100 85 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - - 100 30 WB - - - NB - - 200 10 - SB - 450 10 75 o Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 400 60 400 60 400 60 WB 300 80 300 80 300 80 NB 250 45 600 5 600 o SB 200 40 800 o 800 o DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Table 8-7: Phase 11 (2024) Build Conditions - AM and PM Peak Hour Delay 2024 SimTraffic Summa - AM Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall Intersection U-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB - 1.1 A 1.7 A WB - - - 1.5 A - - NB 27.6 C - 4.7 A SB W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB 0.3 A - WB 0.6 A - NB - - - - - SB 3.7 A W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB 0.6 A - WB - 2.9 A 2.2 A NB - - - - - - SB - - - 4.9 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB - 38.8 D 26.0 C 1.7 A 23.6 C WB 28.0 C 35.1 D 21.3 C 3.4 A NB 33.2 C 35.0 C 23.3 C 2.5 A SB 29.4 C 35.7 D 28.1 C 1.3 A York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - - 3.4 A - WB - - NB 2.4 A SB - 0.4 A 0.4 A Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB - 14.8 B 14.0 B 7.2 A WB 12.1 B 15.9 C 4.8 A NB 4.5 A 4.0 A 0.5 A 0.2 A SB - 3.0 A 0.4 A 0.3 A 2024 SimTraffic Summary - PM Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall U-Turn Left Through Right Intersection Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) Delay LOS (sec/veh) LOS W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB 6.3 A A WB 5.7 A NB 24.7 8.5 7.4 A SB W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB 1.7 A WB 0.5 A NB SB 3.5 A W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB 2.7 A WB 2.5 A 1.9 A NB SB 3.8 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB 52.9 51.9 38.2 1.8 A WB 50.6 34.6 3.8 A NB 56.5 40.2 3.3 36.8 A SB 56.2 57.9 38.7 4.1 A York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB 4.3 A WB NB 3.4 A SB 0.5 A 0.5 A Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 33.2 33.4 11.2 WB 31.4 26.7 16.0 NB 7.9 A 1.8 A 1.7 A SB 14.4 0.4 A 0.3 A DLC Residen ial Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 c Table B-8: Phase 11 (2024) Build Conditions — AM and PM Peak Hour Queuin 2024 SimTraffic Summary - AM Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right Storage 95th % Storage 95th % Storage 95th % W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB 350 45 - WB 250 105 - NB 250 65 - 200 35 SB - - W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB - 400 o - WB - - 250 0 250 0 NB - - - SB - - 100 25 W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB - 650 10 WB - 225 25 225 15 NB - - SB - - 100 25 W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB 400 45 875 90 300 o WB 300 155 700 235 300 o NB 250 120 375 110 200 o SB 250 50 700 95 100 75 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - 100 35 WB - - - NB - 200 5 - SB - 450 o 75 o Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 400 65 400 65 400 65 WB 300 55 300 55 300 55 NB 250 35 600 o 600 o 5B 200 20 800 o 800 o 2024 SimTraffic Summary - PM Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right Storage 95th % Storage 95th % Storage 95th % W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal EB 350 170 WB 250 190 - NB 250 115 200 85 SB - W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC EB - 400 o - WB - 250 0 250 0 NB - - - SB - - 100 35 W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC EB - - 650 90 - WB - 225 20 225 15 NB - - SB - 100 20 W 66th St & York Ave Signal EB 400 145 875 255 300 o WB 300 200 700 230 300 o NB 250 220 375 340 200 o SB 250 90 700 160 100 80 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC EB - 100 30 WB - NB - 200 15 - SB 450 o 75 10 Xerxes Ave & W 64th St TWSC EB 400 75 400 75 400 75 WB 300 85 300 85 300 85 NB 250 55 600 15 600 o SB 200 40 800 o 800 o DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York I December 2015 Traffic and Parking Analysis I v1 Kimley>>>Horn MEMORANDUM To: Cary Teague From: William Reynolds, P.E., AICP, PTP Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: September 22, 2015 Subject: West 66th Street and York Avenue Residential Redevelopment — Parking Demand Memo The following memo documents an analysis of current parking demand, estimated future demand, and planned parking supply for the proposed residential redevelopment at the intersection of West 66th Street and York Avenue in Edina, MN. Introduction DLC Residential is proposing a residential redevelopment project for the site in the north-west quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and West 66th Street. The site is currently occupied by two buildings and surface parking. The Redevelopment Plan assumes that the 62,100 sq. ft. medical/office building located on the north- east section of the site (6550 York Avenue) will remain open during Phase I. The other building on site (3250 West 66th Street) is currently only partially occupied and will be removed. During the redevelopment of the site, the adjacent parcel (3316 West 66th Street) will remain open, and access to York Avenue from the site will be preserved. A shared parking agreement is currently in place between all three buildings, and in order to assess potential impacts of a reduction in surface parking on the adjacent site, current parking demands at 3316 West 66th Street are also included in the parking study. Parking for the proposed residential buildings on site will include a mixture of secure, underground parking and some surface parking, supplied at a ratio of approximately 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit following both Phase 1(230 units) and Phase 11 (145 additional units), Estimated residential parking demands are not discussed as part of this parking study. Data Collection On Thursday, September 3rd, 2015, a parking occupancy study was conducted every thirty minutes from 10 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and again from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. in order to measure parking demand and estimate the peak hour of demand. The site was divided into four areas based on observations of the typical destinations of users of each lot. These areas are shown in Figure 1. Note that the stall count shown in Area C includes the estimated 28 secure stalls under the building, although these were not observed on site. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 kimley-horn.com AU 3316 Building (Area A) 140 StplIs Kimlep>Horn Page 2 Figure 1: Parking Areas Results of the study are provided in Figure 2. The 28 secure stalls in Area C were not counted, and were therefore assumed to be fully occupied throughout the study. As shown, the peak hour was observed to be between 11 a.m. and 12 p.m. Area A was typically around 70 to 75 percent full throughout the day. The building in Area B is only partially occupied; therefore, the parking demands were very low (less than 25 percent occupied). Area C had much higher utilization near the building, with a typical range around 50 to 60 percent occupied (including the assumed secure parking demand). The small lot just to the east of Area B was typically around 40 to 50 percent occupied. The area north of Area D was only used by 3 vehicles all day (less than 5 percent occupied), and these users were assumed to be headed to the 6550 Building. Finally, the shared lot (Area D) was sparsely used, but the 10 to 15 vehicles parked in this area were observed to be from users of all three buildings. kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 96 c'iT5 °- 250 200 150 100 50 0 12 1 11 15 12 1 1 12 106 1 1 103 95. Kimlep)Horn Page 3 Parking Demand Existing Parking Supply on Site 600 550 500 450 400 co 350 a) a) 10:00 AM 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:30 AM 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 2:30 PM 3:00 PM !Area A (3316 Building) ilArea B(3250 Building) • Area C (6550 Building) Area D (Shared Lot) Figure 2: Parking Demand by Time of Day kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 MOO Kimlep)Horn Page 4 3316 West 66th Street Site Although the building located at 3316 West 66th Street and the surrounding parking will remain following the proposed residential redevelopment project on the parcels to east, the building currently has access to a shared parking lot on site. Because much of this shared parking area will be removed during the redevelopment of the site, parking demand associated with the 3316 Building was included in the study to estimate the potential for spillover demand. The building is currently occupied by a bank with a drive-in and medical offices (dermatology). The 33,000 sq. ft. building was assumed to be fully occupied and primarily devoted to medical office space, and 5,500 sq. ft. was taken as the assumed square footage of the bank. In order to estimate parking demand for the building, three sources were consulted: • Parking Generation, 4th Edition. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) • Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, Urban Land Institute (ULI) • Edina Code of Ordinances The uses of the building match most closely with ITE's Land Use Codes 720 (Medical/Dental Office) and 912 (Drive-In Bank). ULI references these same Land Use Codes. The estimated peak parking demand for the 3316 Building using these sources is presented in Table 1. While ULI exclusively uses the 85th percentile of all observations to derive the rate presented, ITE provides both the average rate observed as well as the 85th percentile rate; for context both rates are presented in the table. The Edina Code of Ordinances specifies a minimum parking supply for these uses of one vehicle for every 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA), and also specifies one additional stall for every doctor at medical office buildings. The names of 14 doctors are listed inside the building. In addition to estimated demand and the effective parking ratio, the field observations from September 3rd, 2015, are also presented, along with the parking supply (Area A only) and corresponding ratio. ULI indicates that for banks and office uses, September is a representative month for demand observations, and therefore no seasonal adjustment factors are recommended. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 kimley-horn.com Ale 1 Kimlep)Horn Page 5 Table 1: Parking Demand Estimates, Observations, and Supply for the 3316 Building Building Uses Reference/ Methodology Rate/ Observation Parking Stalls Effective Ratio 27,500 sq. ft. Medical/ Dental Office Space (14 Doctors) 5,500 sq. ft. Drive-In Bank Peak Parking Demand Estimates ITE Parking Generation, Fourth Edition (Average Rate) 3.2 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Medical/Dental 110 3.33 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. 4 Bank ITE Parking Generation, Fourth Edition (85th Percentile) 4.27 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Medical/Dental 149 4.50 5.67 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Bank ULI Shared Parking, Second Edition (85th Percentile) Veh./1 , 000 sq. ft. 4.5 Medical/Dental 149 4.52 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. 4.6 Bank Edina Code of Ordinances Veh./1,000 sq. ft. 5 Medical/Dental 179 5.42 1 Veh./Doctor Veh./1,000 sq. ft. 5 Bank Field Observations Observations 106 @ 3316 Building 110 3.33 @ Shared Lot 4 (assumed) Supply Proposed Supply 140 @ 3316 Building 140 4.24 Based on field observations, parking demand for the 3316 Building closely matches the predicted peak parking demands from ITE's average rate for both uses. While some variability can be expected, the excess 20 percent capacity on site is likely sufficient to meet the needs of the users of the building, even with the removal of the shared parking region to the east. kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Kimlep>Horn Page 6 66th and York Redevelopment Site During Phase I of the residential redevelopment project, the largely vacant 3250 Building will be removed along with the shared parking lot (Area D) in order to accommodate a 230-unit apartment building and underground parking. During this first phase, the 6550 Building will remain open, and the surrounding lots will need to serve all parking demands for the building. The proposed Phase I site layout is shown in Figure 3. The 62,100 sq. ft. building has a variety of tenants, including financial services, real estate services, medical and detail offices, an addiction center, and a testing center. Given the number of different uses, Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building) is most applicable. ITE defines this use as follows: A general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building or buildings may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers and tenant services, such as a bank or savings and loan institution, a restaurant or cafeteria and service retail facilities. The estimated peak parking demand for the 6550 Building, assuming a general office building use with full occupancy, is presented in Table 2. Both the average and 85th percentile rates from ITE are presented, along with the 85th percentile rate from ULI. The Edina Code of Ordinances specifies a minimum parking supply for a professional office building of this size as one stall for every 210.5 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA) based on the formula presented below the table. In addition to estimated demand and the effective parking ratio, the field observations from September 3rd, 2015, are also presented. Because field observations were conducted when the building was approximately 71 percent occupied (18,000 sq. ft. of available leasable space), a forecasted peak parking demand rate is also presented, based on an adjustment to the field observations. ULI indicates that for general office uses, September is a representative month for demand observations, and therefore no seasonal adjustment factors were applied to the forecast. The final section of the table shows the projected parking supply following Phase I. kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 MO3 Page 7 Kimlep)Horn RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT I LEVEL I 66TH &YORK EcLn; mri PRESET D L C S I D r A 20I5August 12th _ ON GRADE PARKING - PHASE 1 EXISTING PARKING AND OFFICE BUILDING ON EAST PARCLE TO REMAIN PHASE 1 LOBBY / ENTRANCE LEASING OFFICE FITNESS j Figure 3: Phase I Site Layout 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 kimley-horn.com Kimlep)Horn Page 8 Table 2: Parking Demand Estimates, Observations, and Supply for the 6550 Building Building Use Reference/ Methodology Rate/ Observation Demand Estimate/ Observation Effective Ratio 62,100 sq. ft. Office Space Demand Estimates ITE Parking Generation, Fourth Edition (Average Rate) Veh./1' 000 sq. ft. 2.84 Office 176 2.84 ITE Parking Generation, Fourth Edition (85th Percentile) Veh' /1 000 sq. ft. 3.45 ' Office 214 3.45 ULI Shared Parking, Second Edition (85th Percentile)1 3.60 Veh• 000 sq. ft. /1' Office 224 3.60 Edina Code of Ordinances2 Veh /1 000 sq. ft. . ' ' ice Office 295 4.75 Field Observations Observations 87 @ 6550 Building 138 2.22 @ Shared Lot 7 (assumed) 28 @ Secure Lot (estimated) Forecast Forecast3 Veh./1 000 sq. ft. 3.13 Office ' 194 3.13 Supply Supply 150 @ 6550 Building 250 4.03 72 @ Shared Lot 28 @ Secure Lot Based on field observations, forecasted parking demand for the 6550 Building under a full occupancy scenario is less than the predicted peak parking demands using the ULI and ITE 85th percentile rates for general office 1 Rate interpolated between rate for 25,000 sq. ft. building (3.8) and rate for 100,000 sq. ft. building (3.4) 2 Rate derived assuming 62,100 GFA and the following formula: 1,000/[(0.00025*GFA)+195] 3 Rate derived based on the assumption that field observations were conducted when building was 71% occupied 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 kimley-horn.com A-toc Kimlep)Horn Page 9 buildings. While some variability can be expected, particularly with changes in tenants, the proposed supply of 250 parking stalls will provide sufficient parking following the completion of Phase I. This supply ratio exceeds even the conservative estimates provided using the 85th percentile rate from both ULI and ITE. Recommendations Based on field observations and a review parking demand estimates from ITE and ULI, the proposed parking supply ratios will adequately serve both office buildings following completion of Phase I. Proposed Parking Supply Ratios: • 3316 Building: 4.24 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA • 6550 Building: 4.03 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 65145-4197 A16(• Drawing name: K:\PNC_U2EV\DLC RESIDEN11AL\160755002_Edina\3 Design\CAD\Exhibits\2016-0107 Fire Truck Movernent\Edina 66th dc York Fire Truck Movement.dwg Layout1 (2) Feb 05, 2016 1118am by: Ryon.Phipps 71{1. decinent. arprth.. with Om concept. end dmom .m.empoi hmen.o. on Instrummi or mnAcir. le Wended Iy fc, 0. specille purpose ond 011.M for which It wp,reppr, pf pnd priapr milenc. on Mie document walnut written ouMorttotion end ocloptoilon hy imierliorn ond inc Khali ha without itobillly to KtoI.rtlo,, cod Amociorag Inc. K i m l e y * H o r D A T E n 0 2 . 0 5 . 2 0 1 6 ® 2 0 1 4 K I U L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S C C I A T E S , I N C . 5 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E W . S T E 2 3 8 1 1 S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 P R O J E C T N O . P H O N E ( 6 5 1 ) 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 F A X ( 6 5 1 ) 6 4 5 - 5 1 1 6 W Y C N . K I L I L E Y - H O R N . C O L I 1 1 6 1 9 9 X X X 2 P H A S E I : F I R E T R U C K M O V E M E N T S 31 V O I - 1.1.11 0S IV vu n I N N3 1 11 1 A1 0 n .) uc k Mo ve m e n t \ Ed in a 6 6 t h & CA ; Kimley*Horn ® 2014 KIULEY—HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1550 UNIVERSITY AVE )8, STE 1380 ST. PAUL. WI 5511 PHONE (651) 6+5-4197 FAX (651) 645-5116 WVAILIGIALEY-408N.001.1 EDINA, MN MILLENNIUM AT SOUTHDALE PHASE II: FIRE TRUCK MOVEMENT SCALE AS NOTED DATE DESIGNED BY xxx 02.05.2016 DRAWN BY X XX CHECKED BY XXX PROJECT NO. 116199XXX DESIGN ENGINEER: SHEET NUMBER XX P.O.UIINSE NULIBER 2 of 2 o n 0 c l he n t P h ic h It w o e p ap as . . R • s ho s e l l.. c o n c e p ts a n d d e a l, . p res e n ts RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT MILLENNIUM at SOUTHDALE Formerly 66th & York RESPONSE TO WORKING PRINCIPLES January 21, 2016 France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions Element Working Principle and Supporting Questions Give-to-Get; Plan & Process Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district principles. 1 How does the proposal contribute to the realization of the principles for the district? Millennium at Southdale will be a high-quality residential community that will present new options for 21't century, life-style housing within the Southdale District. It will transform an auto-oriented office environment on this site into an upscale residential community, rich in amenities and set within a green and more sustainable pedestrian oriented landscape. 2 How can the proposal move beyond the principles for the district? Millennium at Southdale can contribute to the improved visual quality, and enhanced interconnectedness of the District. 3 What tangible and intangible outcomes might be offered by the proposal but cannot be achieved by the project on its own? As a highly visible, gateway site to the Southdale District, Millennium at Southdale will help to "set the tone" for the entire district. First impressions linger, and Millennium at Southdale will be that first impression to all those entering the District from York Avenue. It will portray an image of quality and provide a precedent; pointing the way to how other projects can similarly contribute to higher level of sustainability, enhanced visual quality and interconnectedness within 5 the District. What alternatives were explored to arrive at a proposal that is best aligned with the principles and the opportunities of the district? Many were explored; some more successful than others. In response to critique by staff, the proposal evolved in a way that placed more "human activity" on the prominent street fronts. The building massing 4-to District Function and setbacks were modified to create more "drama" and visual interest on the primary elevations. And the upper levels of the Phase I tower became a "lantern" which will be seen from great distances. Edina Cultural Preferences; Identity Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. DLC is open to the idea of incorporating a public art installation in the auto courtyard nearest York Avenue. 1 Discuss the materials and construction techniques intended for the building and the site with attention directed to ensuring an enduring quality is achieved, especially considering whether the proposal is a background or foreground element of the district. This proposal is an integrated composition of two building which clearly represent Foreground Buildings in the district. As such, the design is exemplary of that position, and the amenities, the architectural character and the materials are of the highest quality possible within its market segment. 2 What qualities of the proposal will be most valued by the community in 50 years? Its proximity to off-site amenities and the richness of its on-site amenities. 3 Describe the ways in which the proposal highlights human activity in the building and on the site, especially when viewed from adjacent or nearby public ways? This composition of buildings will have two very distinct sides. Its "public" side located on the street frontage will showcase its interior amenities by placing the lobby, lounge, fitness spaces and other activity areas on its south facade. The private side of this community will be more sedate and somewhat secluded. It will be reserved for its residents and their guests and will be characterized by a variety of semi-public and private, outdoor activity areas. 4 In what ways does the proposal enhance the economic vibrancy of the district? It will introduce new housing options that will contribute to the 24 hour vitality of the District. A vibrant residential community will replace the poorly occupied and outdated office product. Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district. 1 Describe the ways in which the proposal is self-supporting related to on- and off-site infrastructure and resources. 2 What impacts does the proposal pose on existing on- and off-site infrastructure? 4 The recent traffic study indicates that peak hour traffic will be reduced. Storm water will be managed and improved in quality. Describe the infrastructure features of the proposal that are truly extraordinary by relating the performance of those features to current A-6 Site Design; Transitions Comprehensive Connections; Movement standards, requirements, or best practices. The project will showcase sustainable design principles to the greatest extent affordable. The garage roof walls will be landscaped and greened, usable terraces. The inlet to the underground storm water management system will be expressed in the landscaped area of the auto court. Building systems, mechanical and electrical systems will be as energy efficient as is practical within the project proforma. 5 How the proposal relies on infrastructure of the district for baseline performance? Millennium at Southdale will utilize the existing street system, driveway access points and cross-easement agreements currently in place with its neighbors to the west. Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating movement of people within and to the district. 1 What features and amenities does the proposal lend to the public realm of the district? It will greatly enhance the street frontage on York Avenue. 2 What features and amenities does the proposal introduce to extend the sense of an expansive and engaging public realm to its site? As part of the enhanced street frontage, the project will incorporate high quality pedestrian materials, 3-dimensional elements with lighting, distinctive landscaping and unique signage. 3 Demonstrate the ways in which the proposal supports pedestrians and bicyclists movement and identify those nearby district features that are important destinations. Along with the enhanced on-site pedestrian improvements along York, we are also providing an interior street that provides a welcoming connection to 66th street for the neighbors to the north as well as the proposed building residents. The proposed building parking ramp will also include amenities to support bicyclists (secure bike storage, guest bike racks, repair shop, etc). 4 What features does the proposal employ to ensure a safe and inviting pedestrian experience on the site? The interior of the site will incorporate a variety of outdoor rooms interconnected by well-defined pedestrian ways and a "calmed" interior street which will encourage pedestrian movements between this and the neighborhood to the north. Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without "leftover" spaces on sites. 1 How does the proposal relate in terms of scale to it neighbors? The neighborhood already sports a variety of building types and a variety of height. This proposal will add to that variety by including mixed building heights and step-backs to the massing. It does NOT attempt to maximize density by pushing the limits of allowable height. 2 How does the proposal make full use of the available site, especially those portions of the site not occupied by parking and buildings? Areas NOT utilized for buildings will be developed as open spaces and h-tI Health Innovation amenities for the residents AND promote pedestrian movements between this and the neighborhood to the north. 3 How does the proposal interact with its neighbors? It promotes pedestrians circulation between this and adjacent neighborhoods. It shares cross easements with its neighbors, thereby facilitating convenient access and egress for all. The stepped massing of the proposed buildings fit well within the scale of the area and reinforce step-backs from internal property lines. 4 Describe the zones of activity created by the proposal and compare those areas to zones of activity on adjacent and nearby sites. Unlike most of the existing developments which place a single building in the middle of their sites, this proposal uses the building masses to sculpt and define five distinct outdoor activity areas. Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves. 1 How does this proposal enhance key elements of environmental health? The single biggest improvement in environmental health as a result of this redevelopment will likely be improved ground water quality and managed runoff. An intangible benefit to public health is the addition of the residential uses in close proximity to employment, to retail and restaurants and to transit. The resulting interconnected neighborhood will reduce auto trips and encourage walkability. Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated problems. 1 Identify the problems posed by the proposal or the district requiring innovative solutions and describe the ways in which the proposal responds. Ownership and Phasing of the redevelopment of this site pose the greatest complications. Maintaining access and parking for the existing Titus building which must remain in operation during the construction of the first phase is challenging and is a major driver in the configuration of the Phase I site layout. 2 Describe the metrics to be used to compare the innovations posed by the proposal. This proposal fits within the proscribed residential density of the District. But rather than placing a single high-rise building in the middle of the site, this proposal creatively arranges mid-rise buildings which are complimentary to their neighbors. The resulting variety of outdoors spaces will create well-defined outdoor activity spaces and amenities for its residents and greater visual interest to the District. 3 For those solutions posed by the proposal as innovative, describe how they might become "best practices" for the district. 5 Higher levels of pedestrian connectivity in the streetscape, the creation of usable outdoor spaces within the site boundaries and the variety of building height and mass are all positive practices which can be applied broadly across the District. Land Use; Live-able Precincts Economic Vitality Describe other projects where innovations similar to those included in the proposal have been employed. DLC Residential is currently developing several projects which employ similar principles of neighborhood planning. Millennium and CPW in St. Louis Park are residential communities that are highly integrated into their larger neighborhoods. Promote well-balanced aggregations of "come to" and "stay at" places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. 1 How does the proposal complement the mix of uses in the district? This redevelopment will add additional housing options to a District that historically has had few. It will add to the 24 hour vitality, mixed use and interconnectedness of the district. Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. Describe the proposal in terms of its economic contributions to the 1 district. This proposed apartment redevelopment will help the growth of Healthcare and other job sectors in the area that require a diverse supply of housing alternatives to accommodate a wide range of employee living needs. Additionally, it will encourage working professionals to live in Edina rather than commute to other communities. As full time residents, they will contribute more to the local economy. 2 How does the proposal enhance development on adjacent or nearby sites? The innovative design, quality materials and pedestrian-friendly site improvements will set the standard for future development and will encourage further walkability. Our goal is that our residents will take advantage of the proximity to the Southdale Shopping Center, the Galleria and other neighboring businesses. 3 What features of the site or district limit the potential of the proposal from being fully realized? Land price increases have made it increasingly difficult to make rental developments profitable. 4 Why this proposal is best situated on its proposed site from the perspective of economic vitality? The District has a need for high quality rental units due to the increase of Healthcare employment with better than average wages. The residents of our community will be able to walk to work as well as enliven the area at night with more business to the local restaurants and shops. 5 How does the proposal make the district and the community a better place? The multifamily development will bring young working professionals with disposable income who will support the local economy and eventually establish households in Edina. M13 DATE: February 12, 2016 TO: 3250 West 66th Street Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague — Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner P.E. - Director of Engineering Charlie Gerk — Engineering Technician RE: 3250 West 66th Street — Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Civil drawings undated, title sheet with 1/20/2016 submittal date, and Architectural drawings dated 01/20/16 Details I. A developer's agreement will be required. a. Developer will be required to document existing road conditions on York Ave South (North of 65th) by a pre and post construction condition survey. If degradation occurs during construction as documented by the post construction condition survey, developer is required to improve road by reconstruction or mill and overlay. b. Plat public easement or transfer fee ownership of dedicated public right of way. Survey I. A proposed site survey is required. a. Note location and provide description of street easement for possible 65th Street extension. 2. Apply for vacation of existing easements if needed. Provide confirmation that private easements have been vacated. 3. Describe easements or transfer dedicated outlets for public sidewalk and any public utilities. Traffic and Street 4. Continue construction of sidewalk to fill missing segment near the existing monument sign on Ph. 2. 5. Maintain sidewalk access during construction. 6. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. 7. Clearly denote private paths or sidewalk. Maintenance for non-public sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. 8. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. 9. Roadway light fixtures along York Ave or 66th Street shall be consistent with York Ave and 66th Street structures. 10. Apply for curb cut permit for entrances. 18" bituminous patch required. I I. Show location of garbage collection and service on civil plan set. 12. Building access roads will need to accommodate ladder fire truck (turning template included). a. I 5-ft minimum corner radius most likely required for ladder fire truck turning. Noted 6-ft radius shown on plans. b. West access road most likely will need Fire Lane signage and adjustment of radius. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 (41 1 ii c. Address comments from Fire Marshal on attached turning templates. "it appears on the west side they require the apparatus to "jockey" or back up to make turns. Also this PDF does not show tree canopy obstructions." 13. Accessible parking stall calculations and locations need to be noted. Sanitary and Water Utilities 14. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. 15. Consider moving hydrant located at the NE corner of decorative circle to island area. 16. Clearly indicate private vs public utilities. 17. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 18. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 19. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. 20. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit. Wet tap to occur at night. City staff to be present to inspect, cost to be paid by developer. a. Install gate valve just north of water main connection at 66' Street. Storm Water Utility 21. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report. 22. Verify local overflow elevation to parking garage is above the emergency over flow (EOF) elevation and provide spot elevations. 23. Provide more detailed civil drawings for both phase 1 and phase 2 with rim and inverts identified on the plan view drawings. 24. Provide more detailed information for infiltration system on southeast side of project. 25. Existing removed storm sewer connections will need to be completely removed to catch basin and bulk headed. 26. Evidence of watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed is required for building permit. 27. StormTech representative required to monitor, inspect and verify construction of the underground retention systems. Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 28. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site permit is required. Other Agency Coordination 29. Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit is required. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits are required. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 I,vmv.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826 0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 M I 5s" Turning Performance Analysis 5/1/2013 Parameters: Axle Track Wheel Offset Cramp Angle Tread Width Wheelbase / / 7, / 4 'O O, )sc,,,.. i ,.. i 4,4 •> 1 .1 t9,45 / t ---,--.1 ••/44, Inside Cramp Angle: 45.00 ° Axle Track: 81.92 in. Wheel Offset: 5.25 in. Tread Width: 16.60 in. Chassis Overhang: 65.99 in. Additional Bumper Depth: 19.00 in. Front Overhang 84.99 in. Wheelbase: 258.00 in. Calculated Turning Radii: Inside Turn: 2011. 4 in. Curb to Curb: 3611. 8 in. Wall to Wall: 4111. 1 in. Comments: Truck 12205 Additional Bumper Depth 1 Chassis Overhang // Inside Turning Radius Components PRIDE # Front Tires 0078244 Chassis 0070220 Front Bumper 0123625 Aerial Device 0006900 Notes: Description Tires, Michelin, 425/65R22.50 20 ply XZY 3 tread Dash-2000, Chassis, PAP/SlcyArm/Midmount Bumper, 19" extended, Imp/Vel xxxAerial, 100' Pierce Platform Actual Inside Cramp Angle may be less due to highly specialized options. Curb to Curb turning radius calculated for a 9.00 inch curb. Page 1 of 2 A41 C Turning Performance Analysis 5/1/2013 Definitions: Inside Cramp Angle Maximum turning angle of the front inside tire. Axle Track King-pin to king-pin distance of the front axle. Wheel Offset Offset from the center-line of the wheel to the king-pin. Tread Width Width of the tire tread. Chassis Overhang Distance from the center-line of the front axle to the front edge of the cab. This does not include the bumper depth. Additional Bumper Depth Depth that the bumper assembly adds to the front overhang. Wheelbase Distance between the center lines of the vehicle's front and rear axles. Inside Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle around which the vehicle can turn. Curb to Curb Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the vehicle's tires can turn. This measurement assumes a curb height of 9 inches. Wall to Wall Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the entire vehicle can turn. This measurement takes into account any front overhang due to the chassis, bumper extensions and/or aerial devices. Page 2 of 2 a 2 PROJECT NO. 1161 99 XXX SCALE AS NOTED DESIGNED BY xxx 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W. STE 236N ST. PAUL, IAN 55114 Kimley*Horn ® 2014 K1MLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC. PHONE (651) 645-4197 FAX (651) 645-5116 IWWX1BLEY-TIORN.C4X1 EDINA, MN MILLENNIUM AT SOUTHDALE PHASE I: FIRE TRUCK MOVEMENTS DATE 02.05.2016 DRAWI BY xxx CHECKED BY XXX XX P.E. LICENSE NU KR DESIGN ENCRIEER: SHEET NUMBER 1 of 2 u( 0 Oh 2 g g 1.n• Confront, ingather with I z 0 al. ...pt. and dmigns preaani.d harm!, asa,. hotrurnant of loan4n. intonnd only fa the epacific purpon and cliant for .hirA it aa. prapared. Raan of end Imprapr reliance an lin clan silt without o thane= and adaptation by Iftmlay-Harn and Asnalata. Inc shall b. without nobility to toy-liorn and Aasaeletea. >c 2 'O N 13 3 r 0 Hd 01 CO10 >C X IN Th i ND A 0 V1 >3 f l W 1 9 8 H :1 1 3 S VH d 31 V C1 1 4 1 1 1 0 S IV IN I I IN N 3 1 7 1 1 A1 Drawing name: K:\TWC_LDEIt\DLC RESIDENTAL\160755002_EdiniA3 Design\CADVxhibits\2016-0107 Fire Truck Movernent\Edina 66th & York Fire Truck Moyement.dwg Layout1 Feb 05, 2016 11:20am by Ryan.Phipps CITY OF EDINA Policy on Affordable Housing Background s The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing in order to maintain a diverse population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the City. Since the remaining land appropriate for new residential development is limited, it is essential that a reasonable proportion of such land be developed into affordable housing units. As such, the City of Edina adopts the following Affordable Housing Policy: The Policy 1. This policy applies to all new multi-family developments of 20 or more units that require a re-zoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) or a Comprehensive Plan amendment. 2. New rental developments will provide a minimum of 10% of all rentable area at SO% affordable rental rates or 20% of all rentable area at 60% affordable rental rates as defined below. 3. New for sale developments will provide a minimum of 10% of all livable area at affordable sales prices as defined below. 4. New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 15 years, and this requirement will be memorialized by a land use restrictive covenant. 5. Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the city will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: A. Density bonuses B. Parking reductions ) C. Tax increment financing D. Deferred low interest loans from the Edina Housing Foundation 6. It is the strong preference of the City that each new qualifying development provide its proportionate share of affordable housing, however, the City recognizes that it may not be economically feasible or practical in all circumstances to do so. As such, the City reserves the right to waive this policy (only if circumstances so dictate, as determined by the City). In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: s A. Dedication of existing units in Edina equal to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality, within the determination of the City. B. New construction of units of an equivalent quality within the City at a different site, at the discretion of the City. C. Participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. I D. An alternative proposed by a developer that directly or indirectly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing within the City. Atgo Page I 1 Definitions Rental Housing I Either 10% of all rentable area is both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose income is 50% or less of area median gross income, Or 20% of all rentable area is both rent restricted and occupied by persons whose income is 60% or less of area median gross income. Both incomes (adjusted for family size) and rental rates (adjusted for bedroom count and including utilities) are updated annually by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and published at \Jvww.mnhousing.gov. 2015 income and rental limits are as follows: Gross Incomes Gross Rents 60% 50% 60% 50% 1 Person $36,420 $30,350 Studio $910 2 Persons $41,580 $34,650 1 Bedroom $975 3 Persons $46,800 $39,000 2 Bedroom $1,170 4 Persons $51,960 $43,300 3 Bedroom $1,351 5 Persons $56,160 $46,800 4 Bedroom $1,507 6 Persons $60,300 $50,250 i $758 $812 $975 $1,125 $1,256 Ownership Housing 10% or more of all livable area is affordable to and initially sold to persons whose income is at or below the levels set in the MHFA's "Startup Program" (first time homebuyer). This program has a sales brice limit of $310,000. The Edina Housing Foundation has set this limit at $350,000 in consideration of the high prices in Edina. The Foundation would recommend the following sales prices be used as the acquisition limit in this definition: 1 bedroom $250,000 2 bedrooms $300,000 3+ bedrooms $350,000 The 2015 income limits as published on the MHFA website are as follows: 1-2 person household $86,600 3+ person household $99,500 Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually. See www.mnhousing.gov. Effective: November 1, 2015 i Page I 2 iv _L .2 I S 3 3 ,ATAz.Vsun:idny4,10; 104\6 SIM 1Z L Isn6nv ma!ned ueid 1.1713)is NA eLl!P] )i-10A 1-11-99 luaLucloianapabi lequapisa sS2 tu!P3 >12:10A I-1199 IV INTAId013A3G9 1VII.N30153d j V N ri S 'd 3 . CI 441-11s un:Id nvipslt,°1 41:1 1 437:11:1.71.77 rrELI 111 A it 13 :8111".. I r 1,111:11:111EVEM - A 31;:cloridd - F.4 - — op= 1.1:1j1.1 .' - ,-.1111111KarVi L. Tiflav, 41k. ' 711775nTh ' I .1 H 1111}. I: ON GRADE PARKING 1-z PHASE I - EXISTING PARKING AND OFFICE BUILDING ON EAST PARCLE TO REMAIN p v—it-er rs v- PHASE 1 LOBBY! ENTRANCE LEASING OFFICE # FITNESS LEVEL 1 PHASE 1 RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH & YORK Edina, MN Sketch Plan Review BLCRFS:DENTIAL 2015 August 12th , property line preventing the garage from being expanded directly that way. Commissioners Thorsen and Strauss accepted that amend ent, Commissioner Nemerov noted that he supports the riance as ented; however, has concerns with the level of design detail. Chair Platteter called for the vote; all vote aye; m ion carried. 64) VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 44!\°' A. Sketch Plan Review. Titus/Eberhardt, 66th St at York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 5.6 acre parcel at 6550 Xerxes and 3250 666 Street West. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings and redevelop the site with the following two phase development: Phase I (3250 66th Street West): A 6-7 story, 230-unit apartment building. Six floors of housing above the parking and amenities area, and Phase 2 (6650 Xerxes Avenue): A 5-6 story, I45-unit apartment building. Five and four floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. Teague explained that the primary entrance to the site would be off Xerxes Avenue. There is a secondary access available off of York. Both of these access points exist today. There is a shared access arrangement with the adjacent property owner at 3316 66th Street west. That shared access would also remain. Teague To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: Re-guiding of the site from RM, Regional Medical to CAC, Community Activity Center. The proposed height (7 stories) and density (66 units per acre) would meet the standards of the CAC. A rezoning of all the property to PUD, Planned Unit Development is requested. Teague reported that this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. he Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council is therefore requested to determine if a Small Area Plan is necessary. A study is currently underway in this area as part of the Planning Commission's work plan, adding the France Avenue Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant. They have been asked to address each of the principles with any formal application. 5 1 Page /44 Teague further asked the Commission to note that the applicant is not proposing any affordable housing as part of this project. Given housing policy under consideration by the City Council; this project should be required to provide affordable housing consistent with the policy or 20% of the units designated for affordable housing. Teague concluded that the development team is present to explain their proposal. Appearing for the Applicant Rich Kauffman, DLC Residential and Dennis Sutliff, Elness, Swensen Graham Architects Discussion Commissioner Olsen asked if the majority of the parking would be underground. Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Lee asked if the RMD District shrinks would the district continue to be viable. Planner Teague responded that is a good question. Teague explained that the Regional Medical District evolved because of the hospital and the need for medical uses to be in close proximity. Teague reported that even if the area changes to CAC; medical is still a permitted use in that district. Commissioner Nemerov asked for clarification on the building setback variances. Planner Teague responded that it has been the policy of the Commission and Council to bring (whenever possible) buildings up to the street to enhance the pedestrian experience. Teague did acknowledge because this project will be done in two phases that details can change. Nemerov questioned what would happen if the details changed from approval to build out. Teague said the applicants have indicated they would be redeveloping through the PUD process, adding if there are changes the PUD would need to be amended. Nemerov mentioned he is a little concerned that this proposal is in phases. Applicant Presentation Mr. Kaufman addressed the Commission and gave a brief description of DLC, Inc. and explained the proposed residential redevelopment would occur in two phases. He said if the project proceeds they would be requesting a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning to PUD, and site plan approval. Kaufman said the majority of the apartment units would be one, one-plus and two bedroom units. Kaufman concluded there will be a small number of studio and three bedroom apartments. Mr. Sutliff told the Commission ESG has a long history within this neighborhood. He asked the Commission to note they embraced the France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions. Sutliff said this site is also a gateway site and the intent is to create something dynamitic. Phase I would occur on parcels 2 and 3 and will consist of a 230 unit rental apartment with two levels of underground parking. Wage He reported that the existing Titus building will remain on parcel I . When phase 2 commences the Titus building would be removed. With graphics Sutliff shared schematics of the project. Discussion Commissioner Olsen asked about the affordable housing element. Mr. Sutliff said there is a strong desire to implement affordable housing; however, they need to look for a way to implement it. Sutliff said there will be tradeoffs; reiterating they are willing to discuss it. Commissioner Carr said she likes the design elements of the proposed building and was impressed with the landscaping and the attention paid to pedestrian movements. Commissioner Strauss said he agrees, he likes the building, adding the approach is inviting. Commissioner Forrest commented with regard to sustainability at this time the City is looking for more than industry standards. Forrest said the City, wants developers to go above and beyond that and to also indicate measurable standards. Commissioner Platteter said he has some concerns with the two phase concept and timing. He added he would hate to see the properties on the east become orphan properties. Continuing, Platteter said he can support the CAC designation for this area, adding it makes sense to have all four corners CAC. Platteter stated in his opinion affordable housing is needed period. With regard to the exterior of the building he wasn't "blown away"; suggesting that the curve in the road is followed more closely. In conclusion Platteter said the goal should be to view this parcel as part of a whole; not an individual island. He asked them to ensure that special attention is made to connectivity, transit options, and signals to traffic improvements to achieve the next level for pedestrian movement. Commissioner Nemerov said these four corners are important and suggested that the City and developers work together to develop a connected area. He suggested the possibility of walking bridges spanning the road. Mr. Sutliff said that their intent is to be a good neighbor adding they have every intention to grow the walkability. Sutliff said they are willing to work with city staff on this issue. Chair Platteter stated in this area public and private partnerships will be key to piecing these areas together. Commissioner Forrest commented that the buildings appear welcome and attractive from all sides; however, suggested that the applicant makes sure when the building is constructed that that element remains and isn't just drawings. Mr. Sutliff responded that the step back approach from the street offers the appearance of smaller building mass , 7IPage 7 adding they have every intention of creating a building attractive from all sides. Commissioner Forrest said she also was a bit concerned with the two phase element of the proposal and asked the applicant if there is a time frame. Mr. Kaufman responded that Phase I is ready to start in 2016 with Phase II within five to six years. Commissioner Lee asked what makes this site say" Edina". Mr. Sutliff said this land use element helps create a more mixed use area vs. just retail. The introduction of housing with excellent access to transit and other amenities help the buildings residents to move away from the automobile. Lee said in her opinion more work needs to be done in engaging the street, she pointed out the limited street frontage make it difficult to introduce retail. She suggest that the applicant's revisit their vision. She further added the City also needs to decide what the City wants to see on these four corners. Does the City want smaller shop fronts along the street with stepped back housing; or something different. She asked the applicant to show how people are encouraged to walk, not ride and how is the "true" gateway of this area established. Concluding, Lee also stated she is looking for affordable housing in this development. Commissioner Olsen agreed that much is proposed to be redeveloped at this intersection/corner, adding she too would like to see how they will connect together. She suggested that when they return with a formal applicant they show the connectivity between these corners. Olsen suggested that the applicant look at the bigger picture 'and how this fits into the greater Southdale area. Concluding, Olsen asked if there was any opportunity for other uses on the site. Mr. Sutliff responded that adding retail would complicate parking. He noted there is only a small amount of surface parking available. He said they want to create special outdoor spaces; however, there are restraints. Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant to ensure that people feel invited to walk through the area; she said she understands the difficulty in adding retail, suggesting that amenities like dry cleaners, bike repair, uses that would be used by occupants of the building may work. Commissioner Nemerov asked the applicant who their residents are. Mr. Kaufman responded he believes they will be the 30-stomethings that rent by choice. Nemerov asked the applicant if they were confident they can fill these units. Mr. Kaufman responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Carr asked the applicant to take the time to work on the streetscape and to work with the City on street calming measures on this corner and intersection. Chair Platteter thanked the applicant for their presentation noting the importance of connectivity and enhancing neighborhood walkability. B. 2016 Work Plan 8 I Page Minutes/Edina City Council/September 16. 2015 Finance Director Roggeman introduced Jessica Cook, Ehlers & Associates, to explain the proposed schedule kpr fees and charges. Ms. Cook prsented key findings, capital improvement needs, water rates, sanitary sewer rates, proposed Sewer Access t h --ge and Water Access charge fees, storm sewer rates, utility hill comparisons, and a summary of recommendations. The Council noted that \tties were a core service and thanked staff and Ehlers & Associates for their work. Mr. Roggeman stated that in SeCtion 2. Water Service: I. Per 1,000 gallons for areas of City, $2.69 should read $2.70 and $4.21 should readN$4.22. Member Staunton made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Oedinance No. 2015-19, Amending Section 2-724 Schedule A Setting Fees, as modified above. Methb,er Stewart seconded the motion. . Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2015-20 AMENDING CHAPTER 4 CONCERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES — POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 6, 2015 Manager Neal explained that Edina's liquor ordinance had bn modified on several occasions and the current code requirements were confusing to businesses and difficult for staff to interpret, apply, and enforce. Staff was proposing substantial change and requesting a First Reading of Ordinance No. 2015-20. Economic Development Manager Neuendorf explained that the core principles had not changed and the preference was still for restaurants over bars or nightclubs. The application process, background check process, enforcement, and violation provisions were all working well. The proposed changes had three goals: streamline the language for the sake of clarity and enforceability; allow new establishments that were responsive to the preferences of Edina patrons; and, allow established and new businesses to prosper in the Edina marketplace. The Council asked questions relating to taproorns/brewpubs, a prohibition on bars, table configurations, patios, license fees, special club licenses, and municipal liquors. N. The Council discussed requiring food service for all establishments that serve alcohol, retaining the percentage of floor space that a bar area was allowed to operate in a restaurant, and maintaining the restrictions 9r1 where gaming establishments (e.g., Dave & Buster's) were allowed. The Council notO the absence of/Member Swenson and agreed to postpone the First Reading. Member Brindle made a motioreconded by Member Staunton, postponing consideration of Ordinance No. 2015-20, Amen ing Chapter 4 of the Edina City Code Concerning Alcoholic Beverages, to October 6, 201 es: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VII.D. SKETCH PLAN, WEST 66TH STREET AND YORK AVENUE — REVIEWED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague explained that the Council was asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 5.6 acre parcel at 6550 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West. The proponent was proposing to tear down the existing buildings and redevelop the site with a two-phase development. The proponent was requesting a rezoning of the site from Regional Medical to Planned Unit Development. The proposed height and density would meet the standards of the Planned Unit Development. Proponent Presentation Page 3 Na, Minutes/Edina City Council/September 16, 2015 Rich Kauffman, DLC Residential, talked about DLC Residential and introduced Dennis Sutliff, ESG Architects. Mr. Sutliff present a site map and drawings of the proposed two-phase development and discussed traffic, amenities, and green spaces. Mr. Kauffman shared that DLC Residential felt it could do, at most, 3% affordable housing at a cost of $1.4 million. The Council asked questions relating to the possibility of onsite retail, location of front stoops, the development of Phase 2, cyclist accommodations, and guest parking. The Council supported the green spaces and expressed an interest in seeing a stormwater management plan. The Council encouraged unique architecture that would be valued by the community for years to come, aligning the proposal with Southdale principles, and working with neighbors. The Council also expressed appreciation for the transparency concerning affordable housing and agreed that the main intersection was a problem that needed to be addressed by Edina and Hennepin County. .'\ VII.E. AFFOR D ABLE HOUSING POLICY— POSTPONED TO OCTOBER 6, 2015 ‘ Member Staunt • n made a motion, seconded by Member S ewart, postponing the Affordable Housing Policy to the October 6, 2015 City Council meetin . Ayes: Brindle, Stau eon, Stewart, Hovland ) Motion carried. VII.F. RESOLUTION O. 2015-88 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained th't in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and a proved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Stewart introduce and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015-88 accepting various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, liovland Motion carried. VII.G. ACCEPT SOLAR GARDEN PRQ,POSAL — PROPOSAL REJECTED Manager Neal explained that the request'for proposal had received one response after the deadline. Staff and legal counsel recommended rejectjng the proposal and reoffering the request for proposal. The item would come back before the CounCil on` October 20, 2015. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, rejecting, the Solar Garden proposal and reoffering the request for proposal. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. CORRESPONDEN E AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDE CE n Mayor Hovland acknowle ged the Council's receipeof various correspondence. VIII.B. MINUTES: I. PAR BOARD, AUGUST 11, 2015 2. HE ITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, AUGUST 11, 2015 Informational; no ction required. IX. AVIAT ON NOISE UPDATE — Received 1 X. MA OR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received Page 4 Al 3 ts21111.1Gir 65th Streq to Xerxes ---RedeTsign Barrie Road to be Pedestrian focused DRAFT FOR REVIEW/COMMENT I FEBRUARY 11, 2016 Critical Infrastructure Improvements To set the plan in motion, a number of critical infrastructure improvements need to be addressed, including management of stormwater, select street improvements, and better pedestrian connections via new intersections on France, 66th and York (highlighted in yellow). Architecture Field Office CONTACT: Peter F. Parshall 6400 York Ave. S. #402 Edina, MN 55435 952-928-9824 pete@parshallfamily.org es‘l \or:17\ A PETITION to Mr. Cary Teague, Edina Community Development Director and The Edina Planning Commissioners from Edina Residents in the 6300 and 6400 Block of York Avenue South 55435 PETITION Background. DLC Residential proposes to construct two apartment buildings at the northwest corner of Xerxes Avenue and 66th Street. Building A, replacing the 3250 medical building, will contain 230 units. Building B—to be constructed some four or five years in the future— will replace the Titus Building and contain 145 units. The design plan proposes extending York Avenue into the complex from the north. In accordance with the stated goals of the Edina Planning Commission which include "protecting residential areas," the residents of York Avenue north of these properties hereby petition to alter the traffic plan for this project to prevent significant disruption of our neighborhood. The Problem. The two-block segment of York Avenue between Heritage Drive (essentially 63rd Street) and the proposed development is already densely populated. The 6300 and 6400 blocks of York contain four apartment complexes and three condominiums that contain 317 units (450+ residents). Most traffic from these buildings exits via 64th Street onto Xerxes, an exit that is frequently congested but has the advantage of a central median. Traffic is heavy enough that a pedestrian crossing signal was recently installed. Residents of the two new apartment complexes will enter and exit on the diagonal slant where Xerxes transitions to become York just before the intersection with 66th Street. Entrance is not a problem, but a car exiting the properties can only go south on York or west on 66th. However, the main traffic artery—the Crosstown Highway—lies four blocks north, and one convenient route to the Crosstown under the new plan would lie via York Avenue at the rear of the property to the 64' Street exit. Unfortunately, this would create further congestion at an already overcrowded intersection. The Solution. 1. A cul-de-sac should be created at the south end of York Avenue, at the south edge of the 6450 and 6455 York Avenue property lines. (This would prevent cars "cutting through" the new properties to those on the west, a common occurrence currently.) 2. If necessary, the city might create a one block street at the north end of the develop- ment—essentially 65th Street—to allow a safer exit onto Xerxes northbound. The developers are required to leave sufficient clearance to create such a street. The sightlines are optimal there and a median is already in place to ease left turns. To maintain the cohesion of our neighborhood, reduce traffic congestion, and ensure the safety of the 64th Street exit onto Xerxes, residents of the 6300 and 6400 block respectfully petition the Edina Planning Commissioners to implement this solution. H CI 6450 6400 6415 'l s 1 -1 49 9 M Xerxes Ave. S. 'l s LI 1S 9 M '3 S L1 41 7 9 M Xerxes Ave. S. 6450 6400 York Ave. S. 6455 I 6415 '1 S 19 9 M Xerxes Ave. S. Xerxes Ave S Signature Print Name Unit # Date 3. Unit # Date - 3 /- L0,09-s vmlovv7 Toi Yv-o- 6. Print Name )05- -05 //-6 Signature Unit # Date 1 6 Signature Unit # Date 7. Sc\-,o3 okn5)cl Print Name Print Name Signature Unit # Date 8.,, vftA/rYt/ Signature Unit # Date 10. 6400 York Avenue South 1.‘3,-,3 c fc\ Print Name -11,"--1A•I'v•-h- tap_ Si n ure Unit # Date 4.1(.41 zityine 1:sr.irOitt_Nuazer6 jt4 r 1it)/240Signature d Print Name Signature Unit # Date Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature 3. ' n ce 'kk-Nr 5. Signature Unit # Date 6400 York Avenue South 1. fetes"- dc._ Print Name Signature 2. 1-:-sy ruN suicolso-, 6,0zA /1/ E iito,,cd_434_2 20 ci e 7 /6 Unit # Date 9/& 6. i\-.4 d.• Ait" Print Name 7. e_15000 Signature 8. iq 41(7k) Print Name Signature 9. 1,--ix-p1141,116011Sito,c1v,i64- $, Print Name Signature --"D(r;v14- 60,wlete_t1 10. pSCAA---36. Print Name Signature Print Name Vz-c4ridUl& 4/7 DO -/6 Unit # Date oc Unit # Date {Y(P OL/i R2 Unit # Date ;I—to Unit # Date 11. Print Name Unit # Date Signature 6400 York Avenue South 12. 7o? ? Print Name Signature N Unit # Date 13. Cr-. PtlifIM mi_LAT J6,1 at .5q,c- 64 ij (_)4 ) 0 (-;? it /( Print Name 14. t)i Signature Unit # Date Print Name 15. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 16. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 17. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 18. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 19. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 20. Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date \Pk 404 ()eV-) 65iAt t)) \x„1\140- 0n 1,) cuk0„t ckAckz. gkL.\\t) Print Name Signature Print Name Signature Unit # Date LI2cL 77-1,7(e., Unit # Date ef?O'c--/er 4. 7. fill19-(kW Print Name Signat re Unit # Date 30(-/ Signature Unit # Date 8. Print Name „Lptpte 6,1 ,09/1-dbei1-e jfd Unit # Date 1 Date Print Name 6. ,60,(A Signatt. Unit # 5•J Y}\ JO Ce--VYW) Print Name ture 6400 York Avenue South Print Name Signature Unit # Date 2. Elie n 4 .1-/ ns.e, 0 Print Name Signature Unit # Date 3. 5(24/1 raiSCO/beie —JX•24,4a, -?° ? 016)1c 4—S(-0 3,4 11 — ) Print Name Signature 2 Unit # Date 10. eeivv;r0I-e/tz 313 Print Name Signature Unit # Date 6400 York Avenue South 11. 3o 7 ds--IS -lie Print Name Signature Unit # Date 12. oi-(-,t/ P (51)6,k, ,.gA 3/4 Print Name 13. r 1A Print Name gnature Unit # Date /16 Signatur Unit # Date 14. Print Name Signature Unit # Date 15. Print Name 16. Print Name 17. Print Name 18. Print Name Signature Unit # Date Signature Unit # Date Signature Unit # Date Signature Unit # Date 19. Print Name Signature Unit # Date 1 20. Print Name Signature Unit # Date Unit # Date 6400 York Avenue South 1.- -YAN/74 Se.44`ef #11/ i-7/ Print Name Signature Unit # Date ertA,v-U 2, £4Poi rttz_m@u_rice_ /7/13 -/GQ Print Name Signature Unit # Date AA/doe )14/Q41/ iisegie/je) Print Name Signature Unit # Date 4.%atAdc mk_b oNA c).(344LI,Z3n- \\Nskr-139.4k Li ID Print Name Sigr,ittire Ak° P4rSG// 5. Print Name Signature Unit # Date 6.00-a-Lti 4,i9a/z4q 40 2_. da,144, Print Name Signature Unit # Date 7. —r(-400 \AXJ 0/LIA JIYIArtAftiL (4Di 4gilla_ Print Name Signature Unit # Date 8. 14 Qs. yl/N vy‘ 2-fOri Signature Unit # Date Print Name 9. 0010-Ve MajOkiaLD 0:)/WOOLA124.-- tic.9q/ Print Name ignature Unit # Date 10. i\-) (-'( Print Name Signature Unit # Date 6400 Y ;[-i Arw Print Name Signature Unit # Date 12. 9e s Print Name Signature Unit # Date 13. Ef e S-.41-ge -1 -56u z--( Print Name Signature Unit # Date 14. —j-k..110cOn Q)-1)..CF341 , Print Name Signature Unit # Date 15. a1/4-)C Print Name Signature LIO-( 1 - I /) Unit # Date • 16. Print Name Signature Unit # Date 17. Print Name 18. Print Name Signature Signature Unit # Date Unit # Date 19. Print Name Signature Unit # Date 20. Print Name Signature Unit # Date S' ture Unit # Date Unit # Date Unit # Date Signature , Signature 7-4 r114T,41/Z//' Signature ek/77, Unit # Date 8. Print Name 6400 York Avenue South i.La_ez sa gt77,J,Iti,,L6) 0`-‘ /-02 Print Name Signature Unit # Date 2. L t4- _ 47._/ 6 Print Name 4.6-e-fa t MD K5-e-7-4 Print Name 504//z/ /%92 -Tc7 Print Name S gnature Unit # Date /71 7eg-Al 6. IR-4y IV ce Print ,Na e Signature 4L, Unit # Date ,\ 7. Print Name Signature Unit # Date 9. L # sepm, Print Name Signature Unit # Date 10. Print Name Signature Unit # Date 6400 York Aven outh (}A 30 ) /6- Unit # Date 11. ro Print Name nature VjUnfo Sig Unit # Date CaaC5V Print Name Unit # Date Signature 419./4 26 16 Unit # Date 13. IV( al< Print Name 14. itiivAA/ Print Name 15. Print Name 16. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 17. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 18. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 19. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 20. Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date 3. Print Name 4. e2 0 e Print Name 5. Print Name Signat Unit # Date Cr/ 1Y17/cri e6tYmoin Print Name Sighature Unit # Date 8. 06„, (e/3 • 1 7. j<ke, 1( k Unit # Date Print Name Signature 9 L k 4) Unit # Date Print Name Signature 6400 York Avenue South 1.1-d1A (t-toPLe-- 'eAa.-e,/-e--e gOlf___ 60e 2 2 — Print Name Signature Unit # Date 7. CJkU L-.3eXAY $R-c_ (Li Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date 10. Print Name Signature (26c- Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date fI LA 9( Unit # Date eL7k, *nature 12. I- ZR' 14,) Print Name Print Name Unit # Date Signature 14. for 49 t9( s Print Name Print Name 15. Sig)lature 11. VA 0 L,cuit: 5 Unit # Date 67/L) Unit # Date 16. Print Name Signature Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name ature Unit # Date 6400 York Avenue South 19. Print Name Signature Unit # Date 20. Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date 3[Y V(5(/ Print Name 6. Print Name Avictecc,r471 Signature 27)5iic Unit # Date Print Name 6450 York Avenue South 1. gayie pictoce Print Name ())9i2ut._ Signature 3 Do -/ Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Elow3 ‘)(f7tRi. 3ID Print Name Signature Unit # Date 4. /4v/v/913u4ec1JJli 8. LI* FRE,40121CP Print Name Signature Unit # Date 9. 119-19-111-4 4,1294 ani 6 f-J,S` )iEemAni Print Name Signature Unit # Date 10.A4 ,lic ho,4106-1) i6 Print Name Signature Unit # Date 6450 York Avenue South 11. (DM)/-1 I-1 'LroVE-N 3 7 Print Name 12. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 13. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 14. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 15. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 16. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 17. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 18. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 19. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 20. Signature Unit # Date Signature Unit # Date Print Name 6450 York Avenue South Signature Signature Print Name 5osd ps 16, Unit # Date 30 )- .2, Print Name =_Dy --) LA 1cli. Print Name 6 Print Name Signature Signature Unit # Date 12 Unit # Date Unit # Date 3. a; ii;,(1/ aso Print Name Print Name Signature Unit # Date Unit # Date Signature 10. Signature Print Name -6-q- (7: Litt, 'A--16 -1( Unit # Date 7. /60116) Print Name • S 6 Ai Print Name 1 LP Print Name Signature Unit # Date 6450 York Avenue South 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date ,s-oy Unit # Date s-761 a 3 6/W4;174- Print Name Signature Print Name Signature Unit # Date 9. 6 k ( 8. 5k sA-A WiiW Print Name Print Name Signature S gnature Unit # Date (72 01 ji5 — 14 Unit # Date Unit # Date 6. )1/1t) 51/\ n Print Name Unit # Date Print Name Name Signa ure 7. (PC10,410,4 MA C. (Lt/iMg 20-3 2/15-'4, Unit # Date 6450 York Avenue South fi)(5-r 1.6/o7 Print Name ic14 Signature Unit # Date 2. "D Y- 1 e cic Print Name ignature Unit # Date 4,.,/, 4AL,, 157/i Print Name Signature /111CRELSE' S. ON, LI N I\A Unit # Date ,5-11 6450 York Avenue South 11. V/Iphp Unit # Date 12. \1) Print Name Print Name Signat Unit # Date Signature 13. Print Name 14. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 15. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 16. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 17. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 18. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 19. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 20. Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date 6450 York Avenue South 1. k71Z C-L-4 11-, 4 Print Name Signature TJA, dIto /4„ Unit # Date 4-11) 2. k- Print Name Signature Unit # Date Print Name Signature Unit # Date 4(7 M-IG acij6 Unit # Date 5. CR' 2A-26110 Print Name Signature Unit # Date <i) , 6. AO,Z7,e. /ec,vic .32,(.....y..<1 c:966 Print Name Signatur Unit # Date 7. 49; LAI 2—eict Print Name Signature 8. -RD 2)/ c9dcz, Unit # Date 7-10 du,12_y/c, Print Name Signature Unit # Date 9. %r Print Name Signature Unit # Date 10. -,,19(rn ot-rd 410 Print Name Signature Unit # Date 11. q05-e-tAitA V U406) Print Name Signature Unit # Date 6450 York Avenue South 12. /\&C-C,NINe t-W-NIVrvDtn K Pri (ACY\ -1(e, - Ly Unit # Date 13. lete-h4-40 /144-tei-) 1,0A21/ fcP/a-/, 7/24 Print Name Signature 5irs" Yovfi /kw. s. Unit # Date 14. Print Name 15. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 16. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 17. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 18. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 19. Signature Unit # Date Print Name 20. Signature Unit # Date Print Name Unit # Date Signature ( " 4q,loit,, 063 0-6411-e/A.4,4-- ez-ze--bi kxele aY- hi-456 emni4t_ aita_ - u4cce 2Cee;tey >44,1_,11-,297-42 CZ4/ "te_._e_ 6 )(-`' eterw-a_ 652)41 a-it-zed_ e v. $A--r 4L 2i >14e-,0&i,Le, z(az,, 1,u6Li ezztv,s--0, eLe-C111- 611C- 0/-6C /y ,1d izA A --eteLOAec eAe (12-4-e et.e.e /401 A3 zzz $1-6( waL c o e-Lef 64,4,4L/-,(2e2- tozal Ito& Wig7 c"' S-6e "7-711-e „Y/kA____55M Jackie Hoogenakker From: Joyce Flesche <mjflesche@gmail.com > Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:09 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Edina City council planning rezoning and predevelopment plan. As I look at the map you have sent showing the development plan I noticed that you failed to note that the York street name changes at 66th going north: it becomes Xerxes. The plan shows that the traffic flow from the proposed buildings going north on YOrk avenue instead of creating a street at 65th where northbound traffic could go. Instead, all of this new traffic will go down York and may turn at 64th to access Xerxes or continue down to 63rd where they will add to the traffic congestion of multiple nursing homes. I live in the condo at 6400 York and overlook the hill going up to Xerxes. I have seen poor maintenance by the city and have also seen multiple accidents. When it snows, I can see that the Richfield side of 64th and Xerxes is plowed curb to curb hours before Edina makes a pass that lasts all morning- it goes up the middle and leaves a mess on the outer lane. 64th street is rarely salted so I watch cars slipping and sliding down it after ice storms. In the summer, there is no effort to cut the tree branches of the trees around the pond at the corner, so that when you are making a right d turn you can actually see the oncoming traffic.The only consistent attention 64th street gets from the city is that there is often a police car (speed trap) to catch speeding drivers as they come off the freeway. We have a lot of walkers in the residences along York Avenue. There are no sidewalks and the walkers are forced to use the street. On some days the traffic is prohibitive but usually the drivers are courteous and not a danger to the walkers. However, the proposed increase is definitely going to adversely effect those of us who live here. Please create a 65th street access to Xerxes from the proposed buildings, Laura Caplan 6400 York Avenue S, Apt 209 Edina, MN 55435 952-920-1385 Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 January 8, 2016 Dear Mr. Teague: I am writing to you to share my thoughts about the proposed multi-family residential development by DLC Residential at 65th and York. I live one block away at 6400 York Avenue South, aka The Yorker condominiums. I attended the Public Open House about the project on January 5, 2016. After listening to the developers' presentation and discussion with the public attendees I have several serious concerns about the project that I think you should be aware of. My biggest concern is about traffic on York Avenue both during and after construction and I know that many others in my building share this concern. I asked the developers what route they thought vehicles involved in their construction would take to the site and they answered that it would most likely be from the north of the site on York Avenue. That means that all the construction vehicles would be constantly coming down York Avenue right in front of my building for years. This is a very quiet residential area and the use of York Avenue for construction trucks, etc, would be a major nuisance and could also be hazardous to pedestrians walking on the street, as we don't have sidewalks. As it is expected that this project may take seven years or more to complete, this truck problem is a huge concern. There is no reason why we should have to suffer construction traffic on our block when other options are easily available. Thus I believe that construction vehicles and equipment should only be allowed to enter the site from either 66th Street or the Xerxes/York junction south of 65th Street. My second concern is about increased traffic on York Avenue after the new apartments become occupied. I examined the proposal that your office reviewed in August 2015 in which the developers state that: "The primary entrance to the project would be off Xerxes Avenue. There is a secondary access available off of York." Yet at the public meeting the developers said that both construction vehicles and subsequent residential vehicles would most likely use the York Avenue access north of the site as the primary entrance. This discrepancy needs to be addressed. Access to the project should be largely from Xerxes or 66th Street, not York Avenue north of the site. A number of people from my building also expressed concern at the public meeting about the new residents driving on York Avenue north of the site. The developers suggested that there would be no change in the traffic patterns on York after their project is completed, but we all found that hard to believe. The developers told us that they based this assumption on the thought that many cars now approach the current medical buildings on the site by coming down York Avenue on our block, but this is unlikely. Most cars approach the medical buildings via Xerxes or 66th St. In fact, York Avenue north of the site is not visible from Xerxes or 66th Street so most drivers don't even know it is there. Entrances to the medical buildings are highly visible from Xerxes and 66th Street. Further, if you check either google maps or Mapquest for directions to the medical buildings they will both tell you to enter off of 66th Street or from the Xerxes/York junction south of 65th Street. York Avenue north of the site, where I live, is a very quiet residential street with little traffic. We want to keep it that way. If the York Avenue access north of the site is used as the primary residential access as the developers suggested at the public meeting, then traffic and noise will be increased considerably in perpetuity and this will degrade our quality of life. Beyond the above, we have concerns about traffic at the intersection of 64th Street and Xerxes. Currently there is a lot of traffic on Xerxes coming from both north and south. At times it is treacherous to make a left turn on to Xerxes from 64th Street on the west side of Xerxes. Sometimes several cars trying to make various turns stack up in the island in between the north and south routes of Xerxes at 64th Street. As it is now there should be a stoplight put in at this intersection. And without it, if more traffic is added to this intersection from the DLC development it will only become more treacherous for all using it. As you noted on your website, in the last two years more than 1,200 new apartment units have either opened or are currently under construction in the Southdale area. All of these are in commercial districts, but the DLC project is right next to a residential area. The impact of this project on our residential neighborhood should be a major consideration in the planning of this project and it appears that the developers have not given this enough thought. On your website you state that it is your mission to: "guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses." The DLC project has the potential to significantly deteriorate the quality of life for the residents on York Avenue north of the site in a number of ways both during construction and after. I sincerely hope you will give serious consideration to the concerns expressed in this letter and find ways to address them so that our high quality of life will remain so. Sincerely, Laura Caplan TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS DLC RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH & YORK EDINA, MINNESOTA Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N St. Paul, MN 55114 MARCH 2016 | V4 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 ii TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS DLC RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH AND YORK EDINA, MINNESOTA PLAN APPROVAL Edina Community Development Department By: __________________________ Dated: ___________________________ Edina Engineering Department By: __________________________ Dated: ___________________________ iii DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS DLC RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT AT 66TH AND YORK EDINA, MINNESOTA REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. March 4, 2016 William Reynolds, P.E., AICP, PTP Date License No. 52627 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 iv Contents 1.0 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 City of Edina Transportation Goals .................................................................................................. 1 Traffic and Parking Analysis Objectives ........................................................................................... 2 2.0 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit ........................................................................................ 5 Pedestrian ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Bicycle .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Transit .............................................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 Parking .............................................................................................................................. 8 4.0 Traffic Operations .............................................................................................................. 9 Existing Traffic Conditions................................................................................................................ 9 Background Growth and Future Traffic Conditions ........................................................................ 12 Trip Generation and Distribution .................................................................................................... 17 Delay and Queuing Analysis Results ............................................................................................. 25 Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 27 5.0 Appendix ......................................................................................................................... 28 Appendix A: Supplemental Exhibits .............................................................................................. A-1 Appendix B: Level of Service Results and Queue Projections ..................................................... B-1 Appendix C: SimTraffic Reports ................................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D: Parking Demand Memo ........................................................................................... D-1 v DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Tables Table 4-1: Morning Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase I ....................................... 17 Table 4-2: Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase I ....................................... 18 Table 4-3: Morning Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase II ...................................... 19 Table 4-4: Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase II ...................................... 19 Table B-1: 2018 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Delay ... B-2 Table B-2: 2018 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing B-3 Table B-3: Phase I (2018) Build Conditions – AM and PM Peak Hour Delay ........................... B-4 Table B-4: Phase I (2018) Build Conditions – AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing ...................... B-4 Table B-5: 2024 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Delay ... B-6 Table B-6: 2024 No Build Conditions SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing B-6 Table B-7: Phase II (2024) Build Conditions – AM and PM Peak Hour Delay .......................... B-8 Table B-8: Phase II (2024) Build Conditions – AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing ..................... B-9 Figures Figure 1-1: Project Location .......................................................................................................... 3 Figure 1-2: Site Plan ..................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2-1: Transit Routes Near the Site ...................................................................................... 7 Figure 4-1: Existing (2015) Lane Geometry ................................................................................ 11 Figure 4-2: Future Year (2018) AM No Build Turning Movement Volumes ................................ 13 Figure 4-3: Future Year (2018) PM No Build Turning Movement Volumes ................................ 14 Figure 4-4: Future Year (2024) AM No Build Turning Movement Volumes ................................ 15 Figure 4-5: Future Year (2024) PM No Build Turning Movement Volumes ................................ 16 Figure 4-6: Future Year (2018) AM Phase I Turning Movement Volumes .................................. 21 Figure 4-7: Future Year (2018) PM Phase I Turning Movement Volumes .................................. 22 Figure 4-8: Future Year (2024) AM Phase II Turning Movement Volume .................................. 23 Figure 4-9: Future Year (2024) PM Phase II Turning Movement Volume .................................. 24 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 vi Figure A-1: Existing (2015) AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes ................................. A-2 Figure A-2: Existing (2015) PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes ................................. A-3 Figure A-3: Residential Trip Distribution ................................................................................... A-4 Figure A-4: Residential Trip Driveway Assignment ................................................................... A-5 Figure A-5: Future Year (2018) Residential Trip Assignment – AM Peak Hour ........................ A-6 Figure A-6: Future Year (2018) Residential Trip Assignment – PM Peak Hour ........................ A-7 Figure A-7: Future Year (2024) Residential Trip Assignment – AM Peak Hour ........................ A-8 Figure A-8: Future Year (2024) Residential Trip Assignment – PM Peak Hour ........................ A-9 Figure A-9: Future Year (2024) Office Trips Removed – AM Peak Hour ................................ A-10 Figure A-10: Future Year (2024) Office Trips Removed – PM Peak Hour .............................. A-11 1 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 1.0 BACKGROUND DLC Residential is proposing a residential redevelopment project for the site in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and West 66th Street. The site is currently occupied by two buildings and surface parking The Redevelopment Plan calls for implementation in phases. During Phase I, the 62,100 sq. ft. medical/office building located on the northeast section of the site (6550 York Avenue) will remain open; the other building on site (3250 West 66th Street) is currently only partially occupied and will be removed, replaced with 230 residential units and a combination of surface and secure parking supplied at a ratio of 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit. During Phase II, the 62,100 sq. ft. medical/office building will be removed and replaced with an additional 145 residential units and surface and secure parking, also at a ratio of 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit. During both phases, the existing right-in right-out driveway configuration will be preserved, providing access to both 66th Street as well as York Avenue. The connection to the local streets north of the site will also be preserved, allowing drivers to arrive and depart the site via 64th Street. The project location is shown in Figure 1-1, and the proposed site plan for the fully redeveloped site is shown in Figure 1-2. During the redevelopment of the site, the adjacent parcel (3316 West 66th Street) will remain open, and access to York Avenue from the site will be preserved. A shared parking agreement is currently in place between this building and the two buildings on the redevelopment site. In order to assess the potential impacts of a reduction in surface parking on the adjacent site, current parking demands at 3316 West 66th Street are discussed in the Parking Demand Memo, provided in the Appendix. CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION GOALS The following policies for transportation are included in Chapter 7 of the Edina Comprehensive Plan, Update 2008, adopted by the Edina City Council on December 2, 2008: Goal 1: Maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives. Goal 2: Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. Goal 3: Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina's environment and neighborhood quality of life. Goal 4: Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single-occupant vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicular trips and the use of alternative travel options. Goal 5: Ensure that all Edina's residents, workers, and visitors, including those with transportation disadvantages, have viable travel options. Goal 6: Promote a travel demand management program through a coordinated program of regulations, marketing, and provision of alternative travel options. Goal 7: Provide multiple travel options for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists, and rideshare users, as well as for drivers of private automobiles. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 2 Goal 8: Support attractive and high performance transit service and connections. Goal 9: Manage parking provision to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride-sharing (car pools and van pools), bicycle parking, and increased transit use. Goal 10: Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS OBJECTIVES This traffic and parking analysis details the proposed project, including the site’s design, location, and access plan. It discusses existing and future parking demands, as well parking supply during each project phase. Future traffic conditions are discussed, and potential impacts of the residential redevelopment project are identified. 3 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure 1-1: Project Location DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 4 Figure 1-2: Site Plan 5 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 2.0 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN The site is located adjacent to Southdale Square as well as the Southdale Shopping Center. Sheridan Park is the nearest park, and Sheridan Hill Elementary School is within ½ mile of the site. There is a sidewalk along the length of the site, including the north side of W. 66th Street and the east side of York Avenue/Xerxes Avenue, with the exception of the short (75’) right turn lane into the site from York Avenue. The intersection of W. 66th Street and York Avenue has marked crosswalks across all four legs, and pedestrian crossing pushbuttons in each quadrant. The intersection of W. 66th Street and the Southdale Shopping Center exit has a crosswalk on the east leg with pedestrian pushbuttons in the northeast and southeast quadrants. There is also a marked crosswalk on the south leg of th e intersection of Xerxes Avenue and W. 64th Street. BICYCLE No marked bicycle facilities are available on W. 66th Street, York Avenue, or Xerxes Avenue. TRANSIT Four METRO Transit bus routes stop adjacent to the site. Three additional routes stop one block away from the site at the Southdale Shopping Center. Details for each route are provided below. On W. 66th Street in the westbound direction, the rightmost lane is marked for “Bus Stopping and Right Turns Only,” providing a transit advantage during times of congestion. ADJACENT ROUTES Route 6 Type: Local Bus Nearest Stop: 66th Street & York Avenue Major Destinations: Southdale Center, Xerxes Ave, Uptown Transit Station, Downtown Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Weekday Frequency: 4 to 15 minutes Weekend Frequency: 15 minutes Route 515 Type: Local Bus Nearest Stop: 66th Street & Barrie Road Major Destinations: Southdale Center, VA Medical Center Station, Mall of America Station Weekday Frequency: 15 to 30 minutes Weekend Frequency: 15 to 30 minutes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 6 Route 578 Type: Express Bus Nearest Stop: 66th Street & York Avenue Major Destinations: Southdale Center, 46th Street Station (I-35W), Downtown Minneapolis Weekday Frequency: 30 minutes (peak hour only) Weekend Frequency: - Route 579 Type: Express Bus Nearest Stop: 65th Street & Xerxes Avenue Major Destinations: Southdale Center, 46th Street Station (I-35W), University of Minnesota Weekday Frequency: 4 Northbound AM trips, 3 Southbound PM trips Weekend Frequency: - NEARBY ROUTES Route 537 Type: Local Bus Nearest Stop: Southdale Transit Center Major Destinations: Southdale Center, Normandale Community College Weekday Frequency: 60 minutes Weekend Frequency: - Route 538 Type: Local Bus Nearest Stop: Southdale Transit Center Major Destinations: Southdale Center, Best Buy Headquarters, Southtown Shopping Center, Mall of America Station Weekday Frequency: 30 minutes Weekend Frequency: 30 to 60 minutes Route 684 Type: Express Bus Nearest Stop: Southdale Transit Center Major Destinations: Chaska, Chanhassen, Southwest Station, Southdale Center, Downtown Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Weekday Frequency: 10 Westbound AM trips, 6 Eastbound PM trips Weekend Frequency: - 7 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure 2-1: Transit Routes Near the Site DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 8 3.0 PARKING Given the proposed phasing of development on site, a parking analysis was conducted in order to assess current demands, forecast future demands during Phase I, and confirm that the proposed parking supply will accommodate these demands. Based on field observations and a review of parking demand estimates from ITE and ULI, the proposed parking supply ratios are forecasted to adequately serve the parking demands for the office building on site as well as the office building on the adjacent site. Residential parking demand estimates were not included, but the proposed parking supply of 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit exceeds the minimum requirements for multifamily buildings in a Planned Commercial District under Edina’s Code of Ordinances. A Parking Demand Memo, provided in the Appendix, documents the assumptions and recommendations in more detail, and the proposed parking stall counts and corresponding ratios are provided below. Phase I 3250 Building - Removed 6550 Building o Surface: 222 stalls o Secure: 28 stalls o Total: 250 stalls o Ratio: 4.03 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Phase I Residential o Surface: 29 stalls o Secure: 350 stalls o Total: 379 stalls o Ratio: 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit Adjacent Site (3316 Building) o Surface: 140 stalls o 4.24 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Phase II 6550 Building - Removed Phase I Residential – No Change from Phase I Phase II Residential o Surface: 9 stalls o Secure: 225 stalls o Total: 334 stalls o Ratio: 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit Adjacent Site (3316 Building) – No Change from Phase I 9 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 4.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS An analysis of the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed residential redevelopment project was completed. The assumptions, methodology, results, and recommended improvements are detailed in this section. The following intersections were analyzed for traffic impacts: West 66th Street and Southdale Shopping Center Exit West 66th Street and 3316 West 66th Street West Access West 66th Street and 3316 West 66th Street East Access West 66th Street and York Avenue South York Avenue South and 6550 York Avenue South Access Xerxes Avenue South and West 64th Street The traffic conditions at these intersections were analyzed under four scenarios during the morning and evening peak hours using Synchro 9 and SimTraffic 9: Future Year (2018) No Build Conditions Future Year (2018) Build Conditions – Phase I Future Year (2024) No Build Conditions Future Year (2024) Build Conditions – Phase II EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS West 66th Street/County Round 53 is a four/five-lane east-west A-minor reliever arterial adjacent to the development site. Within the study area, the posted speed limit is 35 mph, and a median is present on both sides of York Avenue South. The 2014 annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume on West 66th Street east of York Avenue South was 14,700 vehicles per day, according to MnDOT’s AADT map. On- street parking is prohibited, and within the five-lane segment between York Avenue South and France Avenue South/County Road 17, the rightmost lane in the westbound direction is marked for buses and right turning vehicles only. Both the access points on West 66th Street included within the analysis are right-in right-out, and a median prevents left turns into or out of each access point. York Avenue South/Xerxes Avenue South/County Road 31 is a two-way north-south major collector street. Within the study area, the posted speed limit is 35 mph south of West 66th Street and 30 mph north of West 66th Street. A median is present on both sides of West 66th Street. The 2014 AADT on Xerxes Avenue south of Highway 62 was 17,300 vehicles per day, and the 2014 AADT on York Avenue south of West 66th Street was 22,000 vehicles per day, according to MnDOT’s AADT map. Parking is allowed on both sides of Xerxes Avenue north of West 65th Street, but parking is prohibited south of West 65th Street within the study area. The access point on York Avenue included within the analysis is right-in right-out, and a median prevents left turns into or out of the access point. The existing lane geometry and intersection control for each of the study intersections is provided in Figure 4-1. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES To analyze traffic operations at the six study intersections, turning movement counts were collected on Thursday, September 17, 2015 during both the morning and evening peak hours. These counts were supplemented with evening counts provided by the City of Edina from the Gateway Pointe Traffic and DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 10 Parking Study, which were collected at the intersection of 66th Street and York Avenue in October 2016. Traffic volumes for the westbound though movement and the southbound through movement were found to be higher in the October counts, and these volumes were therefore used, with the volume difference carried forward to adjacent intersections. The network peak hour of these six intersections was determined to occur from 7:45-8:45AM and from 4:45-5:45PM. The average Peak Hour Factor (PHF) during these hours was calculated at 0.93 in the morning and 0.96 in the evening. Due to the number of access points and intersections within the study area not included within the analysis, traffic volumes were not balanced between intersections. Because all six intersections were counted simultaneously in September, the volume imbalance can be attributed to these access points. The 2015 Existing Turning Movement Counts for the morning and evening peak hours, adjusted with the October counts and rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles by movement, are provided in the Appendix in Figures A-1 and A-2. 11 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure 4-1: Existing (2015) Lane Geometry DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 12 BACKGROUND GROWTH AND FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS In order to analyze traffic operations in future years, a general background growth rate was assumed to account for other development in the region. Because traffic volumes in the area decreased between 2011 and 2014, recent local trends cannot be used to forecast growth, and instead the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20-year period was applied to the 2015 counts. This factor corresponds to 10 percent growth over 20 years, or 0.5 percent annual growth. This rate was confirmed with the City of Edina, and is consistent with the background growth assumed for the nearby Gateway Pointe Traffic and Parking Study. In addition to the regional background growth, traffic associated with specific approved development projects in the area were also incorporated. These included: Gateway Pointe Residential Development Southdale One Apartments 6725 York Avenue Traffic associated with these projects were incorporated by utilizing the 2017 forecasted full build traffic volumes at 66th Street and York Avenue from the Gateway Pointe Traffic and Parking Study1, which included trips associated with these developments. Incremental increases above the background growth assumed by movement were carried forward to adjacent intersections to apply these trips to the entire study area. The Phase I analysis year was assumed to be one year following opening of Phase I (2017), resulting in an analysis year of 2018. The 2018 background traffic for this future No Build scenario, rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles by movement, is provided in Figures 4-2 through 4-3. The Phase II analysis year was assumed to be one year following opening of Phase II (2023), resulting in an analysis year of 2024. The 2024 background traffic volumes for this future No Build scenario, rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles by movement, are provided in Figures 4-4 through 4-5. No geometric modifications or other changes were assumed between existing conditions (2015) and the future No Build analysis years. For the Build analysis, it was assumed that the southbound free right will be converted to an unchannelized 100’ right turn lane in order to remove the island, decrease the pedestrian crossing distance across 66th Street, and improve the walking environment. 1 Morning volumes were not reported in this study. Morning trips associated with this development were therefore calculated and assigned to the network using the same distribution assumptions used in the study for the evening peak hour. 13 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure 4-2: Future Year (2018) AM No Build Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 14 Figure 4-3: Future Year (2018) PM No Build Turning Movement Volumes 15 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure 4-4: Future Year (2024) AM No Build Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 16 Figure 4-5: Future Year (2024) PM No Build Turning Movement Volumes 17 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION TRIP GENERATION Trip Generation estimates were developed based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation, 9th Edition. As these values represent estimates, all values were rounded to the nearest 5 vehicles. Phase I During Phase I, the 3250 Building (3250 W. 66th Street) and adjacent parking will be replaced with a 230- unit, 6-floor apartment building with secure parking. The existing 6550 Building (6550 York Avenue South) and associated surface parking will remain open, along with the existing access locations on both York Avenue South and W. 66th Street. The apartment building is most similar to ITE’s Land Use 220 (“Apartment”), and this land use code was therefore used for developing trip generation estimates: “Apartments are rental dwelling units located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units…” For both the morning and evening peak demand estimates, the average rates associated with the peak hours of adjacent street traffic were used. Although some vehicles were observed parked near the 3250 building at the time of the counts, the building was largely vacant, and no trips were removed from the network for the future year analyses to account for the removal of this building. Additionally, because the 6550 Building was assumed to remain open during Phase I, the existing entries and exits from site driveways were preserved for the future analysis years. Although some degree of internal capture could be expected by co-locating a residential building on the same site as an office building, this would result in a reduction of less than 4 percent of trips according to ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, and no internal capture was assumed within the trip generation analysis. The total net new trips added to the network for the Phase I analysis year for both the morning and evening peak periods is provided in Tables 4-1 and 4-2. Table 4-1: Morning Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase I Code Land Use Description Units No. Rate AM AM Trips Enter (%) AM Trips Exit (%) AM Trips Enter AM Trips Exit Total AM Trips 220 Apartment DUs 230 0.51 20% 80% 25 95 120 25 95 120 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 18 Table 4-2: Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase I Code Land Use Description Units No. Rate PM PM Trips Enter (%) PM Trips Exit (%) PM Trips Enter PM Trips Exit Total PM Trips 220 Apartment DUs 230 0.62 65% 35% 95 50 145 95 50 145 Phase II During Phase II, the 6550 Building (6550 York Avenue South) and adjacent parking will be replaced with a 145-unit 5-floor apartment building with additional secure parking. Upon completion of Phase II, the site will have a total of 375 apartment units, 38 surface stalls, and 576 secure parking stalls. As with Phase I, the average trip generation rates were used, applied to the completed residential development. The removal of the 6550 Building will lead to a significant reduction in the number of trips observed traveling to and from the site under existing conditions. At the time of the turning movement counts, the 62,100 sq. ft. office was approximately 71 percent occupied. Therefore, 44,100 sq. ft. was used to estimate the number of trips to remove from the network for the Phase II analysis. Due to the variety of uses observed within the building, ITE’s Land Use 710 (“General Office Building”) was used for developing trip generation estimates: “A general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building or buildings may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers and tenant services, such as a bank or savings and loan institution, a restaurant or cafeteria and service retail facilities.” The average rate rather than the fitted curve equations produced estimates most similar to observed driveway entries and exits, and this rate was therefore used for both time periods to estimate the number of trips to remove. The total net new trips added to the network for the Phase II analysis year for both the morning and evening peak periods, including the removed office trips, is provided in Tables 4-3 and 4-4. 19 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Table 4-3: Morning Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase II Code Land Use Description Units No. Rate AM AM Trips Enter (%) AM Trips Exit (%) AM Trips Enter AM Trips Exit Total AM Trips 220 Apartment DUs 375 0.51 20% 80% 40 155 195 710 General Office Building (1) 1ksf 44.1 1.56 88% 12% -60 -10 -70 -20 145 125 Table 4-4: Evening Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimates for Phase II Code Land Use Description Units No. Rate PM PM Trips Enter (%) PM Trips Exit (%) PM Trips Enter PM Trips Exit Total PM Trips 220 Apartment DUs 375 0.62 65% 35% 150 80 230 710 General Office Building (1) 1ksf 44.1 1.49 17% 83% -10 -55 -65 140 25 165 Due to the removal of the office trips, trips entering the site during the morning peak hour represents a reduction from existing conditions, and trips exiting the site during the evening peak hour is only expected to increase by twenty-five vehicles. The greatest change in trips assigned to the network compared to existing conditions is associated with the residential trips exiting the site in the morning, and the residential trips returning to the site during the evening. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Residential Trips The trip distribution for the site-generated residential is shown in the Appendix in Figure A-3. This distribution is based on the current traffic patterns in the area as well as the driveway configuration and likely routing to and from the freeways in the area (Highway 62, I-35W, Highway 100, and I-494), as described below: To/From the North (Xerxes Avenue) o Inbound: 65% o Outbound: 40% Approximately 5 U-turns were observed at 66th Street and York Avenue on the southbound approach under existing conditions. For assignment purposes, it is assumed that approximately 20% of northbound trips (8% of total) will make a U- turn at 66th Street and 80% (32% of total) will take York Avenue to 64th Street and make left turn onto Xerxes Avenue to depart to the north. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 20 To/From the West (West 66th Street) o Inbound: 5% Trips from the west and southwest are most likely to arrive via Highway 62 and Xerxes Avenue as opposed to 66th Street from the west given the site driveway configuration and proximity to Highway 62. A negligible number of U-turns were observed on the eastbound approach to York Ave (1 or 2 during the peak hour), so 5% is assumed to capture the drivers that may choose to make this movement to access the site. o Outbound: 25% Due to the right-in right-out driveway configuration, some drivers will choose to proceed west and access Highway 62 from France Avenue, even if headed north or east. To/From the East (West 66th Street) o Inbound: 20% o Outbound: 25% Due to the right-in right-out driveway configuration, some drivers will choose to turn left onto 66th Street to access I-35W, even if headed north. To/From the South (York Avenue) o Inbound: 10% o Outbound: 10% The corresponding site driveway assignment is shown in Figure A-4. Although approximately 35 percent of inbound trips are assumed to use the right in from 66th Street, all southbound, eastbound, and westbound outbound trips were assigned to the York Avenue driveway due to the site configuration and proximity of the secure parking access relative to this driveway. Maps showing the site-generated residential trips for the morning and evening peak hours for both Phase I (2018) and Phase II (2024) are provided in Figures A-5 through A-8. Office Trips Phase II includes the removal of the 6550 Building (6550 York Avenue South), and office trips therefore need to be removed from the network to analyze the full build scenario. The removed office trips are shown in Figures A-9 and A-10, generated using a proportional reduction of the office trips identified in Tables 4-3 and 4-3 based on existing traffic patterns. FUTURE BUILD TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES Taking into account the trip assignment described above as well as the reduction of office trips for Phase II, the estimated Full Build morning and evening peak hour turning movements for both Phase I and Phase II are shown in Figures 4-6 through 4-9. 21 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure 4-6: Future Year (2018) AM Phase I Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 22 Figure 4-7: Future Year (2018) PM Phase I Turning Movement Volumes 23 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure 4-8: Future Year (2024) AM Phase II Turning Movement Volume DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 24 Figure 4-9: Future Year (2024) PM Phase II Turning Movement Volume 25 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 DELAY AND QUEUING ANALYSIS RESULTS Models of each scenario were developed using Synchro, and then delay and queuing were evaluated for each scenario using the average output value from five simulations in SimTraffic. At the intersection of 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue, Highway Capacity Manual (2000) results, produced by Synchro, are provided in order to incorporate two-stage gap acceptance, which SimTraffic is unable to analyze. The Future Year (2018 and 2024) No Build scenarios were analyzed first to provide an understanding of delay and queuing including background traffic growth, before the addition of trips generated by residential development. The Future Year (2018) Phase I Build scenario was analyzed to determine the potential impact of Phase I site traffic on the adjacent study intersections, including all existing office trips from the site. The Future Year (2024) Phase II Build scenario was analyzed to determine the potential impact of Phase II site traffic on the adjacent study intersections, including additional residential trips but accounting for the reduction of office trips. 2018 NO BUILD RESULTS All intersections operate at a level of service (LOS) D or better under the 2018 No Build Conditions scenario, as shown in the Appendix in Table B-1. Three movements exceed the LOS D threshold during the PM peak hour at 66th Street and York Avenue. The northbound, southbound, and westbound left turns at 66th Street and York Avenue have delays in excess of 55 seconds. However, these delays are very close to the D/E threshold, and delays in this range can be expected given the 130-second cycle length. No significant queuing issues are expected during either peak hour, as shown in Table B-2. On the northbound approach to 66th Street and York Avenue, left turn queues are projected to reach the limit of the storage lanes, and in some cases queues in the through lanes can be expected to block entrance into the turn lanes. No significant upstream blockage is expected, however. Queues on the westbound approach can also be expected to block entrance to the turn lane during some cycles, but this will not lead to significant delays. On the southbound approach, queues will occasionally (less than 10 percent of the time during the evening peak hour) block the exit from the 6550 Driveway, but the driveway will continue to operate at LOS A. 2018 PHASE I BUILD RESULTS With the construction of 230 residential units on site during Phase I, all intersections are expected to continue to operate at a level of service (LOS) D or better as shown in the appendix in Table B-3. Average intersection delay at 66th Street and York Avenue is expected to remain approximately equivalent to the No Build condition, with overall average delays increasing by less than 1 second per vehicle during both the AM and PM peak hours. At 66th Street and York Avenue, the eastbound and southbound U-turn movements at 66th Street and York Avenue are estimated to serve 5 to 10 vehicles during the PM peak hour, and while these low volume movements are subject to significant random variability, some vehicles making these movements to access or exit the site may encounter average delays anywhere from 40 to 60 seconds. On the southbound approach, with the conversion of the free right to a 100’ right turn lane, no significant increase in delay is expected for either the southbound through or right turn movements. Additionally, 95th DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 26 percentile queue lengths are not expected to significantly increase, with no increase in upstream driveway blockage compared to the No Build Condition. No other movements at this intersection are expected to have a significant increase in average delay compared to the No Build condition. At 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue, the addition of 15 vehicles per hour to the eastbound approach during the PM peak hour combined with 60 additional southbound vehicles per hour on Xerxes Avenue is estimated to increase delays from around 27 seconds per vehicle to 35 seconds per vehicle on the eastbound approach. This average delay is typically considered acceptable during peak hours, and the minor street approach volumes are lower than the minimum threshold necessary to potentially warrant signalization as a mitigation measure, based on MnDOT guidance. 2024 NO BUILD RESULTS All intersections operate at a level of service (LOS) D or better under the 2024 No Build Conditions scenario, as shown in the Appendix in Table B-5. Average intersection delay at 66th Street and York Avenue is expected to increase by one second overall compared to the 2018 No Build Condition as a result of background traffic growth. As in the 2018 No Build scenario, all left turns at 66th Street and York Avenue have delays very close to the D/E threshold of 55 seconds during the PM peak hour, but a significant increase in delay for these movements is not expected. No other movements are expected to exceed the D/E threshold. No significant changes in queue spillback or lane blockage are expect under the 2024 No Build scenario compared to the 2018 No Build condition, as shown in Table B-6. 2024 PHASE II BUILD RESULTS With the construction of 145 additional residential units on site during Phase II and the removal of the 6550 office building, all intersections are expected to continue to operate at a level of service (LOS) D or better as shown in the appendix in Table B-7. Average intersection delay at 66th Street and York Avenue is expected to remain approximately equivalent to the No Build condition, increasing by less than 1 second per vehicle during the PM peak hour and less than 2 seconds per vehicles during the AM peak hour. As in the 2024 No Build scenario, both the northbound and southbound left turns at 66th Street and York Avenue, as well as the U-turn movements, have delays very close to the D/E threshold of 55 seconds during the PM peak hour, but a significant increase in delay for these movements is not expected. On the southbound approach, the conversion of the free right to a 100’ right turn lane is not expected to lead to a significant increase in delay. While the change is expected to increase average queue lengths, leading to more blockage of the upstream site driveway during peak hours (less than 20 percent of the time during the evening peak hour, as shown in Table B-8), the driveway will continue to operate at LOS A. At 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue, the net increase of 10 vehicles per hour on the eastbound approach during the PM peak hour combined with the net increase of 90 southbound vehicles per hour on Xerxes Avenue is estimated to increase delays from around 28 seconds per vehicle to 36 seconds per vehicle on the eastbound approach. With the removal of the office trips, the total eastbound approach volume is 27 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 expected to remain constant or slightly decrease (5 vehicles per hour) compared to the Phase I condition during the PM peak hour, indicating that the approach will likely continue to remain below the minimum volume threshold necessary to potentially warrant signalization as a mitigation measure, based on MnDOT guidance. RECOMMENDATIONS It is anticipated that the existing area lane geometry and signal timing will be adequate to support future traffic growth and the addition of site traffic at the study area intersections. The proposed conversion of the southbound free right at 66th Street and York Avenue is not expected to significantly degrade traffic operations, and the proposal would improve the pedestrian environment by decreasing the crossing distance across 66th Street. No other geometric or operational improvements are recommended at this time to support the residential redevelopment project. However, the following items are recommended for consideration within the planning horizon of this study: Monitor traffic volumes and delays at the intersection of 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue. Should volumes increase to a level to potentially meet one or more acceptable signal warrants as identified within the MnMUTCD, the following measures should be considered: o Signal installation at 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue o New unsignalized eastbound connection at 65th Street and Xerxes Avenue to distribute traffic between intersections Continue to invest in sidewalk, trail, and bicycle improvements in the area. The areas around 66th Street include significant concentrations of retail, residential, office, and medical land uses, as well as a transit center at Southdale Mall. Providing safe, comfortable, and convenient pedestrian and bicycle connections between these uses has to the potential to reduce local automobile trips, particularly home-based shopping and recreation trips. DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 28 5.0 APPENDIX A. Supplemental Exhibits B. Level of Service Results and Queue Projections C. SimTraffic Results D. Parking Demand Memo APPENDIX A: SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 A-2 Figure A-1: Existing (2015) AM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes A-3 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure A-2: Existing (2015) PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 A-4 Figure A-3: Residential Trip Distribution A-5 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure A-4: Residential Trip Driveway Assignment DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 A-6 Figure A-5: Future Year (2018) Residential Trip Assignment – AM Peak Hour Note: Due to the rounding convention and limited number of trips, approximately 50 percent of outbound trips depart to the north in this scenario after balancing and rounding. A-7 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure A-6: Future Year (2018) Residential Trip Assignment – PM Peak Hour DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 A-8 Figure A-7: Future Year (2024) Residential Trip Assignment – AM Peak Hour A-9 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure A-8: Future Year (2024) Residential Trip Assignment – PM Peak Hour DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 A-10 Figure A-9: Future Year (2024) Office Trips Removed – AM Peak Hour A-11 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Figure A-10: Future Year (2024) Office Trips Removed – PM Peak Hour APPENDIX B: LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS AND QUEUE PROJECTIONS DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 B-2 Table B-1: 2018 No Build Conditions Synchro/SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Delay *Synchro results presented to capture two-stage gap acceptance Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS EB ----1.1 A -- WB ----1.7 A -- NB --26.6 C --3.9 A SB -------- EB ----0.3 A -- WB ----0.6 A -- NB -------- SB ------3.9 A EB ----0.8 A -- WB ----2.9 A 1.9 A NB -------- SB ------7.4 A EB --45.1 D 26.5 C 1.7 A WB 34.3 C 34.3 C 22.6 C 3.4 A NB 34.3 C 36.3 D 23.3 C 2.6 A SB --38.9 D 29.2 C 1.2 A EB ------3.3 A WB -------- NB ----2.2 A -- SB ----0.4 A 0.5 A EB --17.8 C 17.8 C 17.8 C WB --13.3 B 13.3 B 13.3 B NB 9.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A SB --8.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A Overall IntersectionU-Turn Left Through Right 2018 SimTraffic Summary - AM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal 1.8 A W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & York Ave Signal 24.0 C York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC -- Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC -- Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS EB ----6.6 A -- WB ----8.2 A -- NB --23.0 C --10.8 B SB -------- EB ----2.0 A -- WB ----1.3 A -- NB -------- SB ------6.1 A EB ----4.5 A -- WB ----3.5 A 2.2 A NB -------- SB ------4.5 A EB --52.9 D 40.7 D 2.1 A WB --55.7 E 39.1 D 4.6 A NB --55.3 E 39.1 D 3.4 A SB 51.5 D 58.3 E 39.4 D 6.8 A EB ------7.1 A WB -------- NB ----3.3 A -- SB ----0.9 A 0.5 A EB --26.7 D 26.7 D 26.7 D WB --21.7 C 21.7 C 21.7 C NB --9.8 A 0.0 A 0.0 A SB --10.9 B 0.0 A 0.0 A TWSC -- Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC -- York Ave & 6550 Driveway W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & York Ave Signal 36.4 W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal 8.2 A D Overall IntersectionLeftThroughRight 2018 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement U-Turn B-3 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Table B-2: 2018 No Build Conditions Synchro/SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing *Synchro results presented to capture two-stage gap acceptance Upstream Bay Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Blk %Blk % EB --350 45 -- WB --250 110 -- NB 250 65 --200 40 SB ------ EB --400 0 -- WB --250 0 250 0 NB ------ SB ----100 20 EB --650 15 -- WB --225 10 225 10 NB ------ SB ----100 25 EB 400 45 875 105 300 0 WB 300 140 700 235 300 0 3% NB 250 135 375 115 200 0 SB 250 35 250 90 100 75 5% EB ----100 30 WB ------ NB --200 0 -- SB --450 0 75 0 EB 400 15 400 15 400 15 WB 300 10 300 10 300 10 NB 250 0 600 0 600 0 SB 200 0 800 0 800 0 2018 SimTraffic Summary - AM No Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC W 66th St & York Ave Signal York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC Upstream Bay Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Blk %Blk % EB --350 180 -- WB --250 275 -- NB 250 95 --200 85 SB ------ EB --400 5 -- WB --250 0 250 0 NB ------ SB ----100 35 EB --650 155 --1%3% WB --225 15 225 15 NB ------ SB ----100 25 EB 400 135 875 430 300 60 WB 300 240 700 370 300 120 20% NB 250 190 375 330 200 30 26% SB 250 100 250 245 100 95 6%29% EB ----100 40 WB ------ NB --200 15 -- SB --450 25 75 0 EB 400 30 400 30 400 30 WB 300 30 300 30 300 30 NB 250 5 600 0 600 0 SB 200 5 800 0 800 0 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC W 66th St & York Ave Signal W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal Left Through Right 2018 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 B-4 Table B-3: Phase I (2018) Build Conditions Synchro/SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Delay *Synchro results presented to capture two-stage gap acceptance Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS EB ----1.2 A -- WB ----1.5 A -- NB --28.9 C --3.8 A SB -------- EB ----0.4 A -- WB ----0.5 A -- NB -------- SB ------3.9 A EB ----0.8 A -- WB ----2.2 A 1.2 A NB -------- SB ------4.0 A EB --44.5 D 25.2 C 1.8 A WB 32.9 C 37.0 D 23.4 C 3.5 A NB 31.0 C 34.7 C 24.6 C 2.6 A SB 34.8 C 40.8 D 28.9 C 4.7 A EB ------3.9 A WB -------- NB ----2.3 A -- SB ----0.5 A 0.5 A EB --21.0 C 21.0 C 21.0 C WB --13.5 B 13.5 B 13.5 B NB 9.1 A 0.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A SB --8.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal 24.6 C York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC -- Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC -- W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal 1.7 A W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC -- 2018 SimTraffic Summary - AM Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall IntersectionU-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS EB ----6.5 A -- WB ----8.0 A -- NB --25.1 C --10.3 B SB -------- EB ----1.9 A -- WB ----1.1 A -- NB -------- SB ------4.1 A EB ----4.0 A -- WB ----2.9 A 1.4 A NB -------- SB ------7.8 A EB 48.6 D 53.3 D 41.2 D 2.0 A WB --56.0 E 39.5 D 4.8 A NB --56.8 E 39.2 D 3.4 A SB 46.9 D 57.3 E 38.3 D 7.4 A EB ------8.1 A WB -------- NB ----3.5 A -- SB ----0.9 A 0.7 A EB --34.7 D 34.7 D 34.7 D WB --22.2 C 22.2 C 22.2 C NB --10.1 B 0.0 A 0.0 A SB --10.9 B 0.0 A 0.0 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal 36.5 D York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC -- Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC -- W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal 8.2 A W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC -- 2018 SimTraffic Summary - PM Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall IntersectionU-Turn Left Through Right B-5 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Table B-4: Phase I (2018) Build Conditions Synchro/SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing *Synchro results presented to capture two-stage gap acceptance Upstream Bay Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Blk %Blk % EB --350 45 -- WB --250 85 -- NB 250 65 --200 35 SB ------ EB --400 0 -- WB --250 0 250 0 NB ------ SB ----100 25 EB --650 15 -- WB --225 0 225 0 NB ------ SB ----100 25 EB 400 55 875 100 300 0 WB 300 155 700 245 300 0 3% NB 250 130 375 125 200 0 SB 250 75 250 105 100 45 1% EB ----100 40 WB ------ NB --200 5 -- SB --450 0 75 0 EB 400 30 400 30 400 30 WB 300 10 300 10 300 10 NB 250 0 600 0 600 0 SB 200 0 800 0 800 0 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC W 66th St & York Ave Signal W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC 2018 SimTraffic Summary - AM Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right Upstream Bay Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Blk %Blk % EB --350 165 -- WB --250 285 -- NB 250 100 --200 85 SB ------ EB --400 5 -- WB --250 5 250 0 NB ------ SB ----100 35 EB --650 140 --3% WB --225 60 225 20 NB ------ SB ----100 20 EB 400 135 875 405 300 35 WB 300 240 700 375 300 160 21% NB 250 210 375 325 200 115 26% SB 250 185 250 235 100 145 6%15% EB ----100 45 WB ------ NB --200 10 -- SB --450 15 75 15 EB 400 45 400 45 400 45 WB 300 30 300 30 300 30 NB 250 5 600 0 600 0 SB 200 35 800 0 800 0 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC W 66th St & York Ave Signal W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC 2018 SimTraffic Summary - PM Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 B-6 Table B-5: 2024 No Build Conditions Synchro/SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Delay *Synchro results presented to capture two-stage gap acceptance Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS EB ----1.1 A -- WB ----1.7 A -- NB --34.0 C --4.1 A SB -------- EB ----0.3 A -- WB ----0.6 A -- NB -------- SB ------5.1 A EB ----0.8 A -- WB ----2.9 A 2.1 A NB -------- SB ------5.3 A EB --44.1 D 26.5 C 1.8 A WB 35.6 D 33.6 C 22.1 C 3.4 A NB 34.6 C 34.7 C 23.8 C 2.7 A SB --41.0 D 28.4 C 1.3 A EB ------3.1 A WB -------- NB ----2.4 A -- SB ----0.4 A 0.4 A EB --18.2 C 18.2 C 18.2 C WB --13.5 B 13.5 B 13.5 B NB 9.1 A 9.1 A 0.0 A 0.0 A SB --8.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal 23.4 C York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC -- Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC -- W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal 1.9 A W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC -- 2024 SimTraffic Summary - AM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall IntersectionU-Turn Left Through Right Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS EB ----6.7 A -- WB ----9.1 A -- NB --23.6 C --11.2 B SB -------- EB ----2.0 A -- WB ----1.4 A -- NB -------- SB ------4.2 A EB ----4.0 A -- WB ----3.7 A 2.5 A NB -------- SB ------7.2 A EB --52.4 D 41.7 D 2.0 A WB --55.7 E 40.2 D 4.8 A NB --56.6 E 40.5 D 3.4 A SB 47.7 D 58.8 E 38.3 D 7.2 A EB ------7.3 A WB -------- NB ----3.5 A -- SB ----0.9 A 0.4 A EB --28.3 D 28.3 D 28.3 D WB --22.6 C 22.6 C 22.6 C NB --9.9 A 0.0 A 0.0 A SB --11.1 B 0.0 A 0.0 A W 66th St & York Ave Signal 37.0 D York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC -- Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC -- W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal 8.8 A W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC -- 2024 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement Overall IntersectionU-Turn Left Through Right B-7 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Table B-6: 2024 No Build Conditions Synchro/SimTraffic Summary – AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing *Synchro results presented to capture two-stage gap acceptance Upstream Bay Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Blk %Blk % EB --350 50 -- WB --250 95 -- NB 250 75 --200 35 SB ------ EB --400 0 -- WB --250 5 250 0 NB ------ SB ----100 25 EB --650 15 -- WB --225 20 225 10 NB ------ SB ----100 25 EB 400 50 875 100 300 0 WB 300 155 700 235 300 0 2% NB 250 125 375 115 200 0 SB 250 35 250 90 100 80 5% EB ----100 25 WB ------ NB --200 0 -- SB --450 0 75 0 EB 400 15 400 15 400 15 WB 300 10 300 10 300 10 NB 250 0 600 0 600 0 SB 200 0 800 0 800 0 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC W 66th St & York Ave Signal W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC Left Through Right 2024 SimTraffic Summary - AM No Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Upstream Bay Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Blk %Blk % EB --350 185 -- WB --250 290 -- NB 250 115 --200 90 SB ------ EB --400 10 -- WB --250 0 250 0 NB ------ SB ----100 35 EB --650 140 --1% WB --225 20 225 15 NB ------ SB ----100 20 EB 400 135 875 410 300 40 WB 300 220 700 365 300 105 24% NB 250 205 375 335 200 40 27% SB 250 110 250 245 100 95 6%29% EB ----100 35 WB ------ NB --200 15 -- SB --450 25 75 0 EB 400 30 400 30 400 30 WB 300 30 300 30 300 30 NB 250 5 600 0 600 0 SB 200 5 800 0 800 0 York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC W 66th St & York Ave Signal W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC Left Through Right 2024 SimTraffic Summary - PM No Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 B-8 Table B-7: Phase II (2024) Build Conditions Synchro/SimTraffic – AM and PM Peak Hour Delay *Synchro results presented to capture two-stage gap acceptance Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS EB ----1.1 A -- WB ----1.7 A -- NB --32.8 C --4.2 A SB -------- EB ----0.3 A -- WB ----0.5 A -- NB -------- SB ------2.5 A EB ----0.8 A -- WB ----2.2 A 1.2 A NB -------- SB ------5.0 A EB --40.1 D 26.4 C 1.8 A WB 30.1 C 36.9 D 23.2 C 3.5 A NB 33.2 C 37.6 D 25.7 C 2.8 A SB 34.8 C 41.0 D 29.6 C 5.3 A EB ------4.2 A WB -------- NB ----2.5 A -- SB ----0.5 A 0.3 A EB --22.8 C 22.8 C 22.8 C WB --13.5 B 13.5 B 13.5 B NB 9.0 A 9.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A SB --8.0 A 0.0 A 0.0 A Overall IntersectionU-Turn Left Through Right 2024 SimTraffic Summary - AM Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal 1.8 A W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & York Ave Signal 24.8 C York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC -- Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC -- Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS Delay (sec/veh)LOS EB ----6.3 A -- WB ----8.4 A -- NB --23.2 C --10.8 B SB -------- EB ----2.0 A -- WB ----1.2 A -- NB -------- SB ------5.1 A EB ----4.0 A -- WB ----3.0 A 1.5 A NB -------- SB ------5.5 A EB 49.0 D 52.7 D 40.8 D 2.1 A WB --57.5 E 42.1 D 5.2 A NB --54.9 D 40.3 D 3.7 A SB 69.9 E 62.4 E 38.5 D 7.4 A EB ------9.0 A WB -------- NB ----3.5 A -- SB ----1.1 A 0.8 A EB --36.1 E 36.1 E 36.1 E WB --23.2 C 23.2 C 23.2 C NB --10.3 B 0.0 A 0.0 A SB --11.1 B 0.0 A 0.0 A Overall IntersectionU-Turn Left Through Right 2024 SimTraffic Summary - PM Build Traffic Intersection Control Approach Operations by Movement W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal 8.2 A W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC -- W 66th St & York Ave Signal 37.6 D York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC -- Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC -- B-9 DLC Residential Redevelopment at 66th and York │ March 2016 Traffic and Parking Analysis │ v4 Table B-8: Phase II (2024) Build Conditions Synchro/SimTraffic – AM and PM Peak Hour Queuing *Synchro results presented to capture two-stage gap acceptance Upstream Bay Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Blk %Blk % EB --350 50 -- WB --250 110 -- NB 250 65 --200 40 SB ------ EB --400 0 -- WB --250 0 250 0 NB ------ SB ----100 20 EB --650 10 -- WB --225 10 225 5 NB ------ SB ----100 20 EB 400 45 875 100 300 0 WB 300 170 700 250 300 0 4% NB 250 130 375 130 200 0 SB 250 85 250 120 100 50 2% EB ----100 45 WB ------ NB --200 0 -- SB --450 0 75 0 EB 400 40 400 40 400 40 WB 300 10 300 10 300 10 NB 250 0 600 0 600 0 SB 200 0 800 0 800 0 2024 SimTraffic Summary - AM Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC W 66th St & York Ave Signal York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC Upstream Bay Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Storage 95th %Blk %Blk % EB --350 175 -- WB --250 305 -- NB 250 105 --200 90 SB ------ EB --400 10 -- WB --250 0 250 0 NB ------ SB ----100 40 EB --650 150 --3% WB --225 10 225 0 NB ------ SB ----100 20 EB 400 140 875 420 300 45 WB 300 300 700 405 300 120 25% NB 250 235 375 345 200 0 26% SB 250 130 250 255 250 180 17%16% EB ----100 45 WB ------ NB --200 10 -- SB --450 30 75 15 EB 400 45 400 45 400 45 WB 300 35 300 35 300 35 NB 250 5 600 0 600 0 SB 200 5 800 0 800 0 2024 SimTraffic Summary - PM Build Queuing Intersection Control Approach Queue Length by Movement Left Through Right W 66th St & Southdale East Driveway Signal W 66th St & 3316 West Driveway TWSC W 66th St & 3316 East Driveway TWSC W 66th St & York Ave Signal York Ave & 6550 Driveway TWSC Xerxes Ave & W 64th St* TWSC APPENDIX C: SIMTRAFFIC REPORTS HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 7:45 am 9/17/2015 2018 Build - AM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 70 5 15 15 10 30 5 20 320 5 25 625 Future Volume (Veh/h) 70 5 15 15 10 30 5 20 320 5 25 625 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 75 5 16 16 11 32 0 22 344 5 27 672 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh)11 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 990 1130 347 799 1138 174 0 694 349 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 737 737 390 390 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 254 393 408 748 vCu, unblocked vol 990 1130 347 799 1138 174 0 694 349 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.9 6.9 0.0 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.9 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 0.0 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 74 98 98 96 96 96 0 98 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 290 306 655 377 264 845 0 911 1221 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 96 59 22 229 120 27 448 246 Volume Left 75 16 22 0 0 27 0 0 Volume Right 16 32 0050022 cSH 321 484 911 1700 1700 1221 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.30 0.12 0.02 0.13 0.07 0.02 0.26 0.14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 10 200200 Control Delay (s) 21.0 13.5 9.1 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) 21.0 13.5 0.5 0.3 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 7:45 am 9/17/2015 2018 Build - AM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 2 Movement SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 Future Volume (Veh/h) 20 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 22 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SimTraffic Performance Report 2018 Build - AM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 1 1: Southdale East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.2 1.5 28.9 3.8 1.7 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.4 0.5 3.9 0.4 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.8 2.2 1.2 4.0 1.9 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.7 0.3 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 44.5 25.2 1.8 32.9 37.0 23.4 3.5 31.0 34.7 24.6 2.6 34.8 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 40.8 28.9 4.7 24.6 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.9 2.3 0.5 0.5 1.4 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 17.1 17.4 7.6 16.4 15.0 5.1 8.5 5.7 0.6 0.4 3.6 0.4 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.2 2.2 SimTraffic Performance Report 2018 Build - AM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 25.7 Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 Build - AM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 3 Intersection: 1: Southdale East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served TTTTLLR Maximum Queue (ft) 71 48 108 120 77 6 59 Average Queue (ft) 13 6 16 24 21 0 8 95th Queue (ft) 47 30 68 87 64 4 35 Link Distance (ft) 1123 1123 400 400 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Movement SB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 6 95th Queue (ft) 26 Link Distance (ft) 303 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Movement EB SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 25 30 Average Queue (ft) 2 5 95th Queue (ft) 15 23 Link Distance (ft) 188 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 Build - AM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 4 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB Directions Served UL L T T UL L T T UL L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 29 65 92 93 143 179 282 267 121 170 159 129 Average Queue (ft) 6 23 51 40 41 94 158 139 46 77 72 44 95th Queue (ft) 23 53 84 78 116 157 244 224 104 130 124 100 Link Distance (ft) 152 152 152 152 1061 1061 372 372 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 150 150 Storage Blk Time (%)0030000 Queuing Penalty (veh)0070011 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 104 116 143 80 Average Queue (ft) 30 50 50 6 95th Queue (ft) 75 94 106 44 Link Distance (ft) 159 159 159 Upstream Blk Time (%)0000 Queuing Penalty (veh)0000 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 Intersection: 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Movement EB NB Directions Served R T Maximum Queue (ft) 48 7 Average Queue (ft) 23 0 95th Queue (ft) 41 5 Link Distance (ft) 358 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 7:45 am 9/17/2015 2018 No Build - AM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 5 15 15 10 30 5 20 310 5 25 610 Future Volume (Veh/h) 40 5 15 15 10 30 5 20 310 5 25 610 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 43 5 16 16 11 32 0 22 333 5 27 656 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh)11 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 969 1103 339 780 1112 169 0 678 338 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 721 721 380 380 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 248 382 400 732 vCu, unblocked vol 969 1103 339 780 1112 169 0 678 338 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.9 6.9 0.0 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.9 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 0.0 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 86 98 98 96 96 96 0 98 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 297 312 663 384 270 852 0 923 1232 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 64 59 22 222 116 27 437 241 Volume Left 43 16 22 0 0 27 0 0 Volume Right 16 32 0050022 cSH 346 492 923 1700 1700 1232 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.19 0.12 0.02 0.13 0.07 0.02 0.26 0.14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 10 200200 Control Delay (s) 17.8 13.3 9.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) 17.8 13.3 0.5 0.3 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 7:45 am 9/17/2015 2018 No Build - AM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 2 Movement SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 Future Volume (Veh/h) 20 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 22 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SimTraffic Performance Report 2018 No Build - AM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 1 1: Southdale East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.1 1.7 26.6 3.9 1.8 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.6 3.9 0.6 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.8 2.9 1.9 7.4 2.5 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 2.7 0.3 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 45.1 26.5 1.7 34.3 34.3 22.6 3.4 34.3 36.3 23.3 2.6 38.9 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 29.2 1.2 24.0 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.3 2.2 0.4 0.5 1.1 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 16.7 18.9 6.4 14.8 14.4 4.9 11.2 6.0 0.5 0.5 3.4 0.4 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.2 1.8 SimTraffic Performance Report 2018 No Build - AM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 25.6 Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 No Build - AM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 3 Intersection: 1: Southdale East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served TTTTLLR Maximum Queue (ft) 68 39 159 169 83 10 58 Average Queue (ft) 12 5 22 29 21 0 10 95th Queue (ft) 46 24 95 111 65 0 40 Link Distance (ft) 1123 1123 400 400 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Movement SB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 31 Average Queue (ft) 5 95th Queue (ft) 22 Link Distance (ft) 303 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Movement EB WB WB WB SB Directions Served T T T TR R Maximum Queue (ft) 30 10 13 4 30 Average Queue (ft)20105 95th Queue (ft) 15 7 8 3 24 Link Distance (ft) 188 152 152 152 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 No Build - AM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 4 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB Directions Served UL L T T UL L T T UL L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 29 50 108 102 140 165 258 260 124 152 127 112 Average Queue (ft) 5 21 50 42 33 88 160 145 53 84 69 39 95th Queue (ft) 19 45 90 83 97 142 235 231 109 135 117 91 Link Distance (ft) 152 152 152 152 1061 1061 372 372 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 150 150 Storage Blk Time (%)030000 Queuing Penalty (veh)060000 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 59 112 133 70 Average Queue (ft) 9 34 33 28 95th Queue (ft) 37 80 89 74 Link Distance (ft) 155 155 155 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 1 Intersection: 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Movement EB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 34 Average Queue (ft) 11 95th Queue (ft) 28 Link Distance (ft) 358 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 7:45 am 9/17/2015 2024 Build - AM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 90 5 15 15 10 30 5 20 330 5 25 610 Future Volume (Veh/h) 90 5 15 15 10 30 5 20 330 5 25 610 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 97 5 16 16 11 32 0 22 355 5 27 656 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh)11 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 980 1125 339 802 1134 180 0 678 360 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 721 721 402 402 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 259 404 400 732 vCu, unblocked vol 980 1125 339 802 1134 180 0 678 360 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.9 6.9 0.0 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.9 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 0.0 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 67 98 98 96 96 96 0 98 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 294 308 663 376 267 838 0 923 1210 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 118 59 22 237 123 27 437 241 Volume Left 97 16 22 0 0 27 0 0 Volume Right 16 32 0050022 cSH 319 484 923 1700 1700 1210 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.37 0.12 0.02 0.14 0.07 0.02 0.26 0.14 Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 10 200200 Control Delay (s) 22.8 13.5 9.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) 22.8 13.5 0.5 0.3 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 7:45 am 9/17/2015 2024 Build - AM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 2 Movement SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 Future Volume (Veh/h) 20 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 22 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SimTraffic Performance Report 2024 Build - AM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 1 1: Southdale East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.1 1.7 32.8 4.2 1.8 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.5 2.5 0.5 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.8 2.2 1.2 5.0 2.0 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBU Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 2.6 0.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 40.1 26.4 1.8 30.1 36.9 23.2 3.5 33.2 37.6 25.7 2.8 34.8 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement SBL SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 41.0 29.6 5.3 24.8 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.2 2.5 0.5 0.3 1.6 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 20.8 21.3 12.3 18.6 18.5 6.7 5.7 5.3 0.6 0.5 3.0 0.4 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.3 3.0 SimTraffic Performance Report 2024 Build - AM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 26.5 Queuing and Blocking Report 2024 Build - AM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 3 Intersection: 1: Southdale East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served TTTTLLR Maximum Queue (ft) 75 47 150 156 93 6 58 Average Queue (ft) 13 5 21 27 19 0 9 95th Queue (ft) 50 24 94 110 65 4 39 Link Distance (ft) 1123 1123 400 400 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Movement WB SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 6 31 Average Queue (ft) 0 5 95th Queue (ft) 0 22 Link Distance (ft) 188 303 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Movement EB WB WB SB Directions Served T T TR R Maximum Queue (ft) 32 20 5 24 Average Queue (ft)1104 95th Queue (ft) 12 10 4 20 Link Distance (ft) 188 152 152 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2024 Build - AM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 4 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB Directions Served UL L T T UL L T T UL L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 24 48 108 96 172 191 273 284 144 162 150 118 Average Queue (ft) 3 20 55 43 45 102 164 156 47 77 77 47 95th Queue (ft) 16 46 91 83 129 172 249 246 109 132 129 105 Link Distance (ft) 152 152 152 152 1061 1061 372 372 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 150 150 Storage Blk Time (%)0041000 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 10 1010 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 109 128 148 102 Average Queue (ft) 37 57 59 9 95th Queue (ft) 86 108 120 51 Link Distance (ft) 159 159 159 Upstream Blk Time (%)0000 Queuing Penalty (veh)0000 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 0 Intersection: 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Movement EB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 46 Average Queue (ft) 26 95th Queue (ft) 43 Link Distance (ft) 358 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 7:45 am 9/17/2015 2024 No Build - AM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 5 15 15 10 30 5 20 320 5 25 630 Future Volume (Veh/h) 40 5 15 15 10 30 5 20 320 5 25 630 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 43 5 16 16 11 32 0 22 344 5 27 677 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh)11 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.00 vC, conflicting volume 996 1135 350 802 1144 174 0 699 349 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 742 742 390 390 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 254 393 411 753 vCu, unblocked vol 996 1135 350 802 1144 174 0 699 349 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.9 6.9 0.0 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.9 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 0.0 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 85 98 98 96 96 96 0 98 98 cM capacity (veh/h) 288 304 652 376 263 845 0 907 1221 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 64 59 22 229 120 27 451 248 Volume Left 43 16 22 0 0 27 0 0 Volume Right 16 32 0050022 cSH 337 482 907 1700 1700 1221 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.19 0.12 0.02 0.13 0.07 0.02 0.27 0.15 Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 10 200200 Control Delay (s) 18.2 13.5 9.1 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) 18.2 13.5 0.5 0.3 Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 7:45 am 9/17/2015 2024 No Build - AM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 2 Movement SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 Future Volume (Veh/h) 20 Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 22 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SimTraffic Performance Report 2024 No Build - AM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 1 1: Southdale East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.1 1.7 34.0 4.1 1.9 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.6 5.1 0.6 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.8 2.9 2.1 5.3 2.4 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.6 0.3 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 44.1 26.5 1.8 35.6 33.6 22.1 3.4 34.6 34.7 23.8 2.7 41.0 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.4 Total Del/Veh (s) 28.4 1.3 23.4 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.1 2.4 0.4 0.4 1.2 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 15.6 14.9 6.1 15.7 18.0 5.1 9.1 5.1 0.6 0.2 3.3 0.4 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 0.2 1.7 SimTraffic Performance Report 2024 No Build - AM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 25.2 Queuing and Blocking Report 2024 No Build - AM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 3 Intersection: 1: Southdale East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served TTTTLLR Maximum Queue (ft) 70 61 150 169 95 28 58 Average Queue (ft) 13 5 20 26 25 1 7 95th Queue (ft) 48 30 84 97 74 10 33 Link Distance (ft) 1123 1123 400 400 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Movement WB SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 10 36 Average Queue (ft) 0 5 95th Queue (ft) 7 24 Link Distance (ft) 188 303 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Movement EB WB WB WB SB Directions Served T T T TR R Maximum Queue (ft) 34 11 31 21 30 Average Queue (ft)30315 95th Queue (ft) 17 8 20 11 23 Link Distance (ft) 188 152 152 152 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Queuing and Blocking Report 2024 No Build - AM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 4 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB NB NB NB NB Directions Served UL L T T UL L T T UL L T T Maximum Queue (ft) 33 58 101 99 150 169 256 260 119 148 130 118 Average Queue (ft) 5 20 51 43 34 96 158 148 42 77 67 42 95th Queue (ft) 20 48 83 78 103 153 235 230 100 125 116 100 Link Distance (ft) 152 152 152 152 1061 1061 372 372 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 150 150 Storage Blk Time (%)0020000 Queuing Penalty (veh)0060000 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement SB SB SB SB Directions Served UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 60 106 110 70 Average Queue (ft) 10 35 35 30 95th Queue (ft) 35 85 89 78 Link Distance (ft) 155 155 155 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 5 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 6 1 Intersection: 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Movement EB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft) 21 Average Queue (ft) 11 95th Queue (ft) 27 Link Distance (ft) 358 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 4:45 pm 9/17/2015 2018 Build - PM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 5 25 15 5 60 40 995 40 25 840 10 Future Volume (Veh/h) 45 5 25 15 5 60 40 995 40 25 840 10 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 48 5 27 16 5 65 43 1070 43 27 903 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1651 2162 457 1712 2146 556 914 1113 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 962 962 1178 1178 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 688 1199 535 968 vCu, unblocked vol 1651 2162 457 1712 2146 556 914 1113 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.9 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.9 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 68 96 95 89 96 86 94 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 152 138 556 140 119 479 754 635 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 80 86 43 713 400 27 602 312 Volume Left 48 16 43 0 0 27 0 0 Volume Right 27 65 0 0 43 0 0 11 cSH 199 294 754 1700 1700 635 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.40 0.29 0.06 0.42 0.24 0.04 0.35 0.18 Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 30 500300 Control Delay (s) 34.7 22.2 10.1 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS D C B B Approach Delay (s) 34.7 22.2 0.4 0.3 Approach LOS D C Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 SimTraffic Performance Report 2018 Build - PM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 1 1: Southdale East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.5 8.0 25.1 10.3 8.2 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 1.9 1.1 4.1 1.6 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 2.9 1.4 7.8 3.4 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.4 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 48.6 53.3 41.2 2.0 56.0 39.5 4.8 56.8 39.2 3.4 46.9 57.3 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 38.3 7.4 36.5 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 8.1 3.5 0.9 0.7 2.6 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 70.3 72.6 35.4 40.0 59.3 21.2 9.3 1.9 1.8 11.9 0.6 0.5 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.4 SimTraffic Performance Report 2018 Build - PM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 45.1 Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 Build - PM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 3 Intersection: 1: Southdale East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served TTTTLLR Maximum Queue (ft) 190 197 296 324 118 70 112 Average Queue (ft) 104 92 138 160 58 12 47 95th Queue (ft) 166 166 254 285 100 41 85 Link Distance (ft) 1123 1123 400 400 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Movement EB WB SB Directions Served T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 6 7 40 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 12 95th Queue (ft) 4 5 37 Link Distance (ft) 400 188 303 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Movement EB EB EB EB WB SB Directions Served TTTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 37 181 160 104 35 30 Average Queue (ft) 1 43 43 18 1 4 95th Queue (ft) 27 135 130 59 20 21 Link Distance (ft) 188 188 188 152 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 Build - PM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 4 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served UL L T T R UL L T T R UL L Maximum Queue (ft) 134 154 235 236 45 206 302 423 390 278 167 290 Average Queue (ft) 68 89 207 208 2 117 158 260 250 22 82 116 95th Queue (ft) 117 136 259 260 33 192 241 375 359 162 153 209 Link Distance (ft) 152 152 152 152 152 1061 1061 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 33 32 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 80 78 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 250 150 150 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 21 9 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 6 67 8 1 11 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 358 340 131 216 232 150 Average Queue (ft) 231 216 54 120 130 33 95th Queue (ft) 327 309 114 187 219 129 Link Distance (ft) 372 372 159 159 159 Upstream Blk Time (%)000360 Queuing Penalty (veh)0008150 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 26 15 Queuing Penalty (veh) 64 21 Intersection: 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Movement EB NB SB SB SB Directions Served R T T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 59 21 18 46 27 Average Queue (ft) 23 1011 95th Queue (ft) 44 11 5 15 16 Link Distance (ft) 358 159 434 434 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 4:45 pm 9/17/2015 2018 No Build - PM Synchro 9 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 5 25 15 5 60 40 990 40 25 780 10 Future Volume (Veh/h) 30 5 25 15 5 60 40 990 40 25 780 10 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 5 27 16 5 65 43 1065 43 27 839 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1584 2092 425 1676 2076 554 850 1108 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 898 898 1172 1172 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 686 1194 503 904 vCu, unblocked vol 1584 2092 425 1676 2076 554 850 1108 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.9 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.9 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 80 97 95 89 96 86 95 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 161 144 583 144 125 481 797 638 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 64 86 43 710 398 27 559 291 Volume Left 32 16 43 0 0 27 0 0 Volume Right 27 65 0 0 43 0 0 11 cSH 229 300 797 1700 1700 638 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.29 0.05 0.42 0.23 0.04 0.33 0.17 Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 29 400300 Control Delay (s) 26.7 21.7 9.8 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS D C A B Approach Delay (s) 26.7 21.7 0.4 0.3 Approach LOS D C Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 SimTraffic Performance Report 2018 No Build - PM 2/26/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Southdale East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.6 8.2 23.0 10.8 8.2 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.0 1.3 6.1 1.7 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.5 3.5 2.2 4.5 4.0 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 52.9 40.7 2.1 55.7 39.1 4.6 55.3 39.1 3.4 51.5 58.3 39.4 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.8 36.4 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.1 3.3 0.9 0.5 2.3 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 33.9 29.8 11.0 39.8 30.0 14.7 7.4 1.8 2.0 14.1 0.5 0.3 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.0 SimTraffic Performance Report 2018 No Build - PM 2/26/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 45.4 Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 No Build - PM 2/26/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Southdale East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served TTTTLLR Maximum Queue (ft) 195 192 281 313 106 56 104 Average Queue (ft) 113 87 138 163 56 10 51 95th Queue (ft) 181 161 261 277 95 39 84 Link Distance (ft) 1123 1123 400 400 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Movement EB SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 10 36 Average Queue (ft) 0 13 95th Queue (ft) 7 37 Link Distance (ft) 400 303 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB SB Directions Served TTTTTTRR Maximum Queue (ft) 111 190 208 72 44 38 30 Average Queue (ft) 4 47 52 15 2 1 6 95th Queue (ft) 48 138 151 53 17 15 24 Link Distance (ft) 188 188 188 152 152 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 2 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 16 Queuing and Blocking Report 2018 No Build - PM 2/26/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served UL L T T R UL L T T R UL L Maximum Queue (ft) 124 151 228 229 133 219 334 450 451 350 151 246 Average Queue (ft) 62 85 206 208 5 107 152 256 243 12 79 112 95th Queue (ft) 117 134 266 268 58 200 242 368 352 120 143 188 Link Distance (ft) 152 152 152 152 152 1061 1061 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 32 32 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 77 78 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 250 150 150 Storage Blk Time (%) 1 2 20 7 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 3 8 62 6 1 9 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 426 354 40 141 222 230 70 Average Queue (ft) 231 212 1 37 114 123 48 95th Queue (ft) 331 312 29 98 201 222 95 Link Distance (ft) 372 372 372 155 155 155 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 4 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0 9 16 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 26 29 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 60 36 4 Intersection: 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Movement EB NB SB SB Directions Served R T T T Maximum Queue (ft) 56 30 32 46 Average Queue (ft) 17 1 2 4 95th Queue (ft) 39 13 17 26 Link Distance (ft) 358 155 434 434 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 4:45 pm 9/17/2015 2024 Build - PM Synchro 9 Report WLR Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 40 5 25 15 5 65 40 1025 40 25 895 10 Future Volume (Veh/h) 40 5 25 15 5 65 40 1025 40 25 895 10 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 43 5 27 16 5 70 43 1102 43 27 962 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1731 2252 486 1774 2236 572 973 1145 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 1022 1022 1210 1210 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 710 1231 564 1027 vCu, unblocked vol 1731 2252 486 1774 2236 572 973 1145 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.9 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.9 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 69 96 95 88 95 85 94 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 140 130 532 132 111 468 717 618 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 75 91 43 735 410 27 641 332 Volume Left 43 16 43 0 0 27 0 0 Volume Right 27 70 0 0 43 0 0 11 cSH 189 288 717 1700 1700 618 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.40 0.32 0.06 0.43 0.24 0.04 0.38 0.20 Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 33 500300 Control Delay (s) 36.1 23.2 10.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS E C B B Approach Delay (s) 36.1 23.2 0.4 0.3 Approach LOS E C Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 SimTraffic Performance Report 2024 Build - PM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 1 1: Southdale East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.3 8.4 23.2 10.8 8.2 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.0 1.2 5.1 1.6 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 3.0 1.5 5.5 3.5 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.4 0.4 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 49.0 52.7 40.8 2.1 57.5 42.1 5.2 54.9 40.3 3.7 69.9 62.4 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 38.5 7.4 37.6 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 9.0 3.5 1.1 0.8 2.5 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.2 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 53.2 49.6 22.4 45.6 36.7 17.2 7.7 1.8 1.7 11.2 0.6 0.5 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.5 SimTraffic Performance Report 2024 Build - PM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 45.7 Queuing and Blocking Report 2024 Build - PM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 3 Intersection: 1: Southdale East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served TTTTLLR Maximum Queue (ft) 188 177 293 307 118 73 111 Average Queue (ft) 110 83 148 174 62 12 49 95th Queue (ft) 173 156 280 303 107 45 90 Link Distance (ft) 1123 1123 400 400 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Movement EB EB WB SB Directions Served T T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 11 14 10 36 Average Queue (ft) 0 0 0 13 95th Queue (ft) 8 10 0 38 Link Distance (ft) 400 400 188 303 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Movement EB EB EB EB WB SB Directions Served TTTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 38 184 184 65 19 30 Average Queue (ft) 1 48 50 13 1 3 95th Queue (ft) 27 137 139 44 10 18 Link Distance (ft) 188 188 188 152 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 13 Queuing and Blocking Report 2024 Build - PM 3/3/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report WLR Page 4 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served UL L T T R UL L T T R UL L Maximum Queue (ft) 139 163 231 242 90 209 362 477 446 210 192 287 Average Queue (ft) 72 92 210 214 3 115 172 283 275 12 89 127 95th Queue (ft) 124 141 261 262 47 198 299 405 389 120 157 237 Link Distance (ft) 152 152 152 152 152 1061 1061 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 35 34 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 89 87 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 250 150 150 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 2 25 13 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 7 83 12 2 12 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 369 358 89 161 206 236 150 Average Queue (ft) 239 220 0 57 131 138 44 95th Queue (ft) 346 326 0 128 198 223 151 Link Distance (ft) 372 372 372 159 159 159 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 1560 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 3 12 17 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 26 16 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 67 22 0 Intersection: 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Movement EB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served R TTTTR Maximum Queue (ft) 60 11 28 26 58 26 Average Queue (ft) 21 01141 95th Queue (ft) 44 8 11 10 28 13 Link Distance (ft) 358 159 434 434 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 50 Storage Blk Time (%)0000 Queuing Penalty (veh)0000 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina 4:45 pm 9/17/2015 2024 No Build - PM Synchro 9 Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 30 5 25 15 5 65 40 1025 40 25 805 10 Future Volume (Veh/h) 30 5 25 15 5 65 40 1025 40 25 805 10 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Hourly flow rate (vph) 32 5 27 16 5 70 43 1102 43 27 866 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Raised Raised Median storage veh) 1 1 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1635 2156 438 1726 2140 572 877 1145 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 926 926 1210 1210 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 710 1231 516 931 vCu, unblocked vol 1635 2156 438 1726 2140 572 877 1145 tC, single (s) 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.9 6.9 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.5 5.5 6.5 5.9 tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.2 3.3 2.2 2.2 p0 queue free % 79 96 95 88 96 85 94 96 cM capacity (veh/h) 152 137 572 136 119 468 779 618 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Volume Total 64 91 43 735 410 27 577 300 Volume Left 32 16 43 0 0 27 0 0 Volume Right 27 70 0 0 43 0 0 11 cSH 218 295 779 1700 1700 618 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.29 0.31 0.06 0.43 0.24 0.04 0.34 0.18 Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 32 400300 Control Delay (s) 28.3 22.6 9.9 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS D C A B Approach Delay (s) 28.3 22.6 0.4 0.3 Approach LOS D C Intersection Summary Average Delay 2.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 SimTraffic Performance Report 2024 No Build - PM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 1 1: Southdale East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT NBL NBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 6.7 9.1 23.6 11.2 8.8 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 2.0 1.4 4.2 1.7 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBT WBT WBR SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 4.0 3.7 2.5 7.2 3.8 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBU SBL SBT Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.4 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 52.4 41.7 2.0 55.7 40.2 4.8 56.6 40.5 3.4 47.7 58.8 38.3 4: York Ave & W 66th St Performance by movement Movement SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.0 0.3 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.2 37.0 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Performance by movement Movement EBR NBT SBT SBR All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s) 7.3 3.5 0.9 0.4 2.5 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.2 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s) 45.5 63.1 12.9 41.6 39.6 16.0 8.8 1.8 1.8 13.6 0.5 0.4 6: Xerxes Ave & W 64th St Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s) 3.2 SimTraffic Performance Report 2024 No Build - PM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s) 0.5 Total Del/Veh (s) 46.3 Queuing and Blocking Report 2024 No Build - PM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 3 Intersection: 1: Southdale East Driveway Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB Directions Served TTTTLLR Maximum Queue (ft) 228 217 306 328 160 95 124 Average Queue (ft) 111 97 156 178 63 13 52 95th Queue (ft) 183 172 275 292 115 52 92 Link Distance (ft) 1123 1123 400 400 574 574 574 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 2: 3316 W 66th St West Driveway Movement WB SB Directions Served T R Maximum Queue (ft) 10 31 Average Queue (ft) 0 11 95th Queue (ft) 8 35 Link Distance (ft) 188 303 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: W 66th St & 3316 W 66th St East Driveway Movement EB EB EB EB WB WB WB SB Directions Served TTTTTTTRR Maximum Queue (ft) 110 173 177 80 22 60 36 30 Average Queue (ft) 4 44 45 16 1225 95th Queue (ft) 48 127 132 50 12 20 17 22 Link Distance (ft) 188 188 188 152 152 152 296 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100 Storage Blk Time (%) 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 Queuing and Blocking Report 2024 No Build - PM 2/29/2016 DLC Residential - Edina SimTraffic Report Kimley-Horn Page 4 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement EB EB EB EB EB WB WB WB WB WB NB NB Directions Served UL L T T R UL L T T R UL L Maximum Queue (ft) 131 147 230 237 80 216 257 413 397 209 134 277 Average Queue (ft) 67 87 210 214 3 118 152 266 257 10 78 114 95th Queue (ft) 118 137 258 261 42 195 219 363 350 105 132 204 Link Distance (ft) 152 152 152 152 152 1061 1061 Upstream Blk Time (%) 0 1 35 34 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 2 89 85 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 200 200 250 150 150 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 24 10 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 5 78 9 0 6 Intersection: 4: York Ave & W 66th St Movement NB NB NB B7 SB SB SB SB Directions Served T T R T UL T T R Maximum Queue (ft) 394 333 67 14 136 209 222 70 Average Queue (ft) 233 217 3 0 44 119 134 54 95th Queue (ft) 337 316 42 5 109 201 222 95 Link Distance (ft) 372 372 372 810 155 155 155 Upstream Blk Time (%) 1 0 1 3 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 2 8 17 Storage Bay Dist (ft) 50 Storage Blk Time (%) 27 29 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 66 38 4 Intersection: 5: York Ave & 6550 York Avenue Driveway Movement EB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served R TTTTT Maximum Queue (ft) 40 10 22 10 32 38 Average Queue (ft) 18 01023 95th Queue (ft) 36 7 14 0 16 24 Link Distance (ft) 358 155 155 434 434 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) 25 Storage Blk Time (%) 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 APPENDIX D: PARKING DEMAND MEMO kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 MEMORANDUM To: Cary Teague From: William Reynolds, P.E., AICP, PTP Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: September 22, 2015 Subject: West 66th Street and York Avenue Residential Redevelopment – Parking Demand Memo The following memo documents an analysis of current parking demand, estimated future demand, and planned parking supply for the proposed residential redevelopment at the intersection of West 66th Street and York Avenue in Edina, MN. Introduction DLC Residential is proposing a residential redevelopment project for the site in the north-west quadrant of the intersection of York Avenue and West 66th Street. The site is currently occupied by two buildings and surface parking. The Redevelopment Plan assumes that the 62,100 sq. ft. medical/office building located on the north- east section of the site (6550 York Avenue) will remain open during Phase I. The other building on site (3250 West 66th Street) is currently only partially occupied and will be removed. During the redevelopment of the site, the adjacent parcel (3316 West 66th Street) will remain open, and access to York Avenue from the site will be preserved. A shared parking agreement is currently in place between all three buildings, and in order to assess potential impacts of a reduction in surface parking on the adjacent site, current parking demands at 3316 West 66th Street are also included in the parking study. Parking for the proposed residential buildings on site will include a mixture of secure, underground parking and some surface parking, supplied at a ratio of approximately 1.6 stalls per dwelling unit following both Phase I (230 units) and Phase II (145 additional units). Estimated residential parking demands are not discussed as part of this parking study. Data Collection On Thursday, September 3rd, 2015, a parking occupancy study was conducted every thirty minutes from 10 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and again from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. in order to measure parking demand and estimate the peak hour of demand. The site was divided into four areas based on observations of the typical destinations of users of each lot. These areas are shown in Figure 1. Note that the stall count shown in Area C includes the estimated 28 secure stalls under the building, although these were not observed on site. Page 2 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Figure 1: Parking Areas Results of the study are provided in Figure 2. The 28 secure stalls in Area C were not counted, and were therefore assumed to be fully occupied throughout the study. As shown, the peak hour was observed to be between 11 a.m. and 12 p.m. Area A was typically around 70 to 75 percent full throughout the day. The building in Area B is only partially occupied; therefore, the parking demands were very low (less than 25 percent occupied). Area C had much higher utilization near the building, with a typical range around 50 to 60 percent occupied (including the assumed secure parking demand). The small lot just to the east of Area B was typically around 40 to 50 percent occupied. The area north of Area D was only used by 3 vehicles all day (less than 5 percent occupied), and these users were assumed to be headed to the 6550 Building. Finally, the shared lot (Area D) was sparsely used, but the 10 to 15 vehicles parked in this area were observed to be from users of all three buildings. 3316 Building (Area A) 140 Stalls Shared Lot (Area D) 101 Stalls 6550 Building (Area C) 3250 Building (Area B) 27 Stalls 95 Stalls 27 Stalls 177 Stalls Page 3 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Figure 2: Parking Demand by Time of Day 95 103 106 98 94 96 102 97 5 6 6 5 5 7 7 7 110 107 118 108 101 103 98 105 15 11 12 11 12 12 8 8 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 10:00 AM 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:30 AM 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 2:30 PM 3:00 PM Pa r k e d V e h i c l e s Parking Demand Area A (3316 Building)Area B (3250 Building) Area C (6550 Building)Area D (Shared Lot) Existing Parking Supply on Site Page 4 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 3316 West 66th Street Site Although the building located at 3316 West 66th Street and the surrounding parking will remain following the proposed residential redevelopment project on the parcels to east, the building currently has access to a shared parking lot on site. Because much of this shared parking area will be removed during the redevelopment of the site, parking demand associated with the 3316 Building was included in the study to estimate the potential for spillover demand. The building is currently occupied by a bank with a drive-in and medical offices (dermatology). The 33,000 sq. ft. building was assumed to be fully occupied and primarily devoted to medical office space, and 5,500 sq. ft. was taken as the assumed square footage of the bank. In order to estimate parking demand for the building, three sources were consulted: Parking Generation, 4th Edition. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, Urban Land Institute (ULI) Edina Code of Ordinances The uses of the building match most closely with ITE’s Land Use Codes 720 (Medical/Dental Office) and 912 (Drive-In Bank). ULI references these same Land Use Codes. The estimated peak parking demand for the 3316 Building using these sources is presented in Table 1. While ULI exclusively uses the 85th percentile of all observations to derive the rate presented, ITE provides both the average rate observed as well as the 85th percentile rate; for context both rates are presented in the table. The Edina Code of Ordinances specifies a minimum parking supply for these uses of one vehicle for every 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA), and also specifies one additional stall for every doctor at medical office buildings. The names of 14 doctors are listed inside the building. In addition to estimated demand and the effective parking ratio, the field observations from September 3rd, 2015, are also presented, along with the parking supply (Area A only) and corresponding ratio. ULI indicates that for banks and office uses, September is a representative month for demand observations, and therefore no seasonal adjustment factors are recommended. Page 5 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Table 1: Parking Demand Estimates, Observations, and Supply for the 3316 Building Building Uses Reference/ Methodology Rate/ Observation Parking Stalls Effective Ratio 27,500 sq. ft. Medical/ Dental Office Space (14 Doctors) 5,500 sq. ft. Drive-In Bank Peak Parking Demand Estimates ITE Parking Generation, Fourth Edition (Average Rate) 3.2 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Medical/Dental 110 3.33 4 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Bank ITE Parking Generation, Fourth Edition (85th Percentile) 4.27 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Medical/Dental 149 4.50 5.67 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Bank ULI Shared Parking, Second Edition (85th Percentile) 4.5 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Medical/Dental 149 4.52 4.6 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Bank Edina Code of Ordinances 5 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Medical/Dental 179 5.42 1 Veh./Doctor 5 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Bank Field Observations Observations 106 @ 3316 Building 110 3.33 4 @ Shared Lot (assumed) Supply Proposed Supply 140 @ 3316 Building 140 4.24 Based on field observations, parking demand for the 3316 Building closely matches the predicted peak parking demands from ITE’s average rate for both uses. While some variability can be expected, the excess 20 percent capacity on site is likely sufficient to meet the needs of the users of the building, even with the removal of the shared parking region to the east. Page 6 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 66th and York Redevelopment Site During Phase I of the residential redevelopment project, the largely vacant 3250 Building will be removed along with the shared parking lot (Area D) in order to accommodate a 230-unit apartment building and underground parking. During this first phase, the 6550 Building will remain open, and the surrounding lots will need to serve all parking demands for the building. The proposed Phase I site layout is shown in Figure 3. The 62,100 sq. ft. building has a variety of tenants, including financial services, real estate services, medical and detail offices, an addiction center, and a testing center. Given the number of different uses, Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building) is most applicable. ITE defines this use as follows: A general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building or buildings may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services, insurance companies, investment brokers and tenant services, such as a bank or savings and loan institution, a restaurant or cafeteria and service retail facilities. The estimated peak parking demand for the 6550 Building, assuming a general office building use with full occupancy, is presented in Table 2. Both the average and 85th percentile rates from ITE are presented, along with the 85th percentile rate from ULI. The Edina Code of Ordinances specifies a minimum parking supply for a professional office building of this size as one stall for every 210.5 sq. ft. of gross floor area (GFA) based on the formula presented below the table. In addition to estimated demand and the effective parking ratio, the field observations from September 3rd, 2015, are also presented. Because field observations were conducted when the building was approximately 71 percent occupied (18,000 sq. ft. of available leasable space), a forecasted peak parking demand rate is also presented, based on an adjustment to the field observations. ULI indicates that for general office uses, September is a representative month for demand observations, and therefore no seasonal adjustment factors were applied to the forecast. The final section of the table shows the projected parking supply following Phase I. Page 7 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Figure 3: Phase I Site Layout Page 8 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 Table 2: Parking Demand Estimates, Observations, and Supply for the 6550 Building Building Use Reference/ Methodology Rate/ Observation Demand Estimate/ Observation Effective Ratio 62,100 sq. ft. Office Space Demand Estimates ITE Parking Generation, Fourth Edition (Average Rate) 2.84 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Office 176 2.84 ITE Parking Generation, Fourth Edition (85th Percentile) 3.45 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Office 214 3.45 ULI Shared Parking, Second Edition (85th Percentile)1 3.60 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Office 224 3.60 Edina Code of Ordinances2 4.75 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Office 295 4.75 Field Observations Observations 87 @ 6550 Building 138 2.22 7 @ Shared Lot (assumed) 28 @ Secure Lot (estimated) Forecast Forecast3 3.13 Veh./1,000 sq. ft. Office 194 3.13 Supply Supply 150 @ 6550 Building 250 4.03 72 @ Shared Lot 28 @ Secure Lot Based on field observations, forecasted parking demand for the 6550 Building under a full occupancy scenario is less than the predicted peak parking demands using the ULI and ITE 85th percentile rates for general office 1 Rate interpolated between rate for 25,000 sq. ft. building (3.8) and rate for 100,000 sq. ft. building (3.4) 2 Rate derived assuming 62,100 GFA and the following formula: 1,000/[(0.00025*GFA)+195] 3 Rate derived based on the assumption that field observations were conducted when building was 71% occupied Page 9 kimley-horn.com 2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 buildings. While some variability can be expected, particularly with changes in tenants, the proposed supply of 250 parking stalls will provide sufficient parking following the completion of Phase I. This supply ratio exceeds even the conservative estimates provided using the 85th percentile rate from both ULI and ITE. Recommendations Based on field observations and a review parking demand estimates from ITE and ULI, the proposed parking supply ratios will adequately serve both office buildings following completion of Phase I. Proposed Parking Supply Ratios: 3316 Building: 4.24 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 6550 Building: 4.03 parking stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Director Parks and Recreation Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance 2016-03 Amending Chapter 24-258 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Offering of Ordinance 2016-03 Amending Chapter-24-258; First Reading INTRODUCTION: Ordinance 2016-03 Amending Chapter 24-258 Concerning An Ordinance Amending Chapter 24 Of The Edina City Code Concerning Conduct In Parks, Street, Sidewalks, And Publicly Owned Property (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only.) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Ordinance 2016-03 Amending Chapter 24-258 of the Edina City Code Concerning Conduct in Parks, Street, Sidewalks, and Publicly Owned Property Ordinance 2016-03 Amending Chapter 24-258 March 15, 2016 Mayor and City Council Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Ordinance 2016-03 Amending Chapter 24-258 Of The Edina City Code Concerning Conduct In Parks, Street, Sidewalks, And Publicly Owned Property (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only.) Information / Background: The Parks & Recreation Department is proposing the attached changes to City Code Chapter 24-258 Amending Chapter 24 of the Edina City Code Concerning Conduct in Parks, Street, Sidewalks, And Public Spaces specifically addressing sale and consumption of intoxicating or non-intoxicating malt liquor and wine. A summary of the changes is below: 1. Sec. 24-254, Part 14, A2 adds Braemar Arena and Braemar Golf Dome to other Parks & Recreation facilities. 2. Adds the sale of intoxicating malt liquor and wine at Van Valkenburg and Fred Richards parks. 3. Adds the sale of intoxicating malt liquor and wine in the lawn games area of Centennial Lakes Park. 4. Removes stipulation of serving 3.2 non-intoxicating malt liquor and replaces it with the sale of intoxicating beer and wine. These changes are requested due to recent requests to host events that allow intoxicating malt liquor and wine at the public park facilities. Braemar Arena was selected as the host for the 2016 Robertson Cup for the North American Hockey League (NAHL). The NAHL would like to serve malt liquor at the event as it has tremendous financial benefits for both the NAHL and the arena. It also adds to the environment of enjoying high level hockey. The lawn games area at Centennial Lakes Park would benefit from beer and wine sales for private events, tournaments and leagues. This ordinance change has the potential to increase the utilization of the lawn games at Centennial Lakes. The trend statewide is to offer malt liquor and wine in confined areas in public park facilities. If approved, the council would be asked to support a resolution approving malt liquor and wine to be dispensed under strict guidelines at these facilities for special events. The proposed ordinance is presented for the First Reading only. Staff recommends that the City Council accept the First Reading of Ordinance 2016-03. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Attachments: Proposed Ordinance No. 2016-03 1 185581v1 ORDINANCE NO. 2016-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING CONDUCT IN PARKS, STREET, SIDEWALKS, AND PUBLICLY OWNED PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 24-254(14) of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: Consume intoxicating or non-intoxicating malt liquor, wine or intoxicating liquor, as defined in chapter 4, except that: a. Intoxicating malt liquor and wine which is dispensed by the city or by an authorized agent of the city may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24-258 in the following places: 1. Inside the clubhouse building or on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the clubhouse building at Braemar Golf Course and at Fred Richards Park. 2. Inside the Edinborough Park building, the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum building, the building at Arneson Acres Park, the Edina Art Center Building, the Edina Senior Center, Braemar Golf Dome, Braemar Arena and on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to such buildings. b. Intoxicating malt liquor and wine which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the city pursuant to a temporary on-sale liquor license issued in accordance with chapter 4 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24-258 within the confines of the ball field complex at Van Valkenburg Park, c. Wine and intoxicating malt liquor which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city at an on-sale dispensary authorized pursuant to section 4-2 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules 2 185581v1 and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24-258 on the grounds of Braemar Golf Course. Intoxicating malt liquor and wine which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city at an on-sale dispensary authorized pursuant to section 4- 2 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24-258 on the grounds of Fred Richards. Wine and intoxicating malt liquor which is dispensed by the city or by an agent of the city at an on-sale dispensary authorized pursuant to section 4-2 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the park director pursuant to section 24- 258 on the lawn games area of Centennial Lakes Park. d. Intoxicating malt liquor and wine may be consumed at sidewalk cafes which are licensed in accordance with chapter 4 and which are authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section 24-313. e. Alcoholic beverages may be consumed on premises holding a temporary on- sale intoxicating liquor license issued pursuant to chapter 4, or a caterer's permit issued by the commissioner of public safety and which are authorized by a permit issued pursuant to section 24-346. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: _________________________________ _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk 3 185581v1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of ___________________, 20__, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 20__. _____________________________________ City Clerk Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Pickleball Court Donation, Rosland Park, Resolution No. 2016-35 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2016-35 accepting the donation of $150,000 for construction of a pickleball court complex at Rosland Park. INTRODUCTION: Edina residents Bruce and Paul Mooty have proposed to generously donate funds to the City to construct pickleball courts adjacent to the tennis courts at Rosland Park. The cost of the construction of the court complex will be covered through a generous $150,000 donation from the Melvin R. Mooty & Sally R. Mooty Family Foundation and John W. Mooty Foundation Trust. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Pickleball Court Donation, Rosland Park Final Grading and Layout Park Board, July 14, 2015 Minutes Res. 2016-35 Mooty Donation March 15, 2016 Mayor and City Council Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Pickleball Court Donation, Rosland Park Information / Background: Edina residents Bruce and Paul Mooty have proposed to generously donate funds to the city to construct pickleball courts adjacent to the tennis courts at Rosland Park. The cost of the construction of the court complex will be covered through a generous $150,000 donation from the families of Paul and Bruce Mooty, who are donating in honor of their parents. The Mootys are making the donation for the court complex to the Edina Community Foundation through the Melvin R. Mooty & Sally R. Mooty Family Foundation and John W. Mooty Foundation Trust. If approved, construction will begin this spring and would be completed by July 4. This project will include five pickleball courts, 8’ vinyl coated chain link fencing and windscreens. The site was explored for the potential of adding a restroom and picnic shelter facility similar to Wooddale Park, but the lack of proximity to sewer and water connections made this option not financially viable. Rosland Park is a very active park with a variety of different activities for residents to enjoy. There is a tennis court adjacent to the site which is well used by kids and adults. The site does not have a dedicated parking lot or dedicated restroom facilities but it is adjacent to a very popular walking path around Lake Cornelia. This path leads to parking and restroom facilities. The Park Board provided review and comment on this proposal at the July 2015 Park Board meeting. The Park Board had some concerns about the distance from restroom facilities and lack of a dedicated parking lot but, otherwise, members generally supported the project. The approved July Park Board minutes are attached. This location is recommended by Parks & Recreation Administrative staff and Park Maintenance staff. Several sites were reviewed, including Lewis Park, Yorktown Park and Cornelia School Park. This site was chosen due to the size of parcel available, proximity to a tennis facility, distance from residential impact and on-street parking available. The closest parking lot is a .17 mile walk along the Lake Cornelia trail and the nearest restroom is a .24 mile walk also along the Lake Cornelia trail. Bolton STAFF REPORT Page 2 Menk was hired to complete the engineering and design and assist with the permit process with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Courts typically last 8 to 10 years before needing resurfacing, which usually costs $10,000 - $15,000. Annual maintenance costs for this facility are anticipated to be $500 or less and include weed whipping, spraying and debris removal, if needed. Pickleball is a sport in which two, three or four players use solid paddles made of wood or composite materials to hit a whiffle ball over a net. The sport shares features of other racquet sports, the dimensions and layout of a badminton court, and a net and rules similar to tennis, with a few modifications. Pickleball was invented in the mid-1960s and has quickly become popular among adults as a fun game for players of all levels across the country. Pickleball is popular because it is easy to learn and easy on the knees and elbows, making it a great alternative to tennis, which can lead to injuries in these sensitive areas. Because the pickleball court is shorter than a tennis court, less running is required. The rules are simple so the game is easy to learn and master in a short time. While pickleball has the strongest following among the senior demographic, part of the appeal is that it’s really a multigenerational sport. Eight-and nine-year olds can have fun playing with 80-year olds. Kids are learning the game in school. The smaller court also creates a social atmosphere, and playing doubles and/or mixed doubles is promoted. Pickleball can generate an adequate heart rate to provide cardio-respiratory conditioning. Yet, at the same time, it is less taxing on the joints and muscles. The small court space reduces the speed required to reach the ball and the weight of the racquet and the weight of the ball reduce the ballistic forces transferred to the wrist, elbow and shoulder. Those who may no longer be able to play tennis, racquetball or other team sports gravitate to pickleball because it is competitive, active and enjoyable. It also is a sport that appeals to those who have never or have had limited involvement in sports. Pickelball was officially introduced to Edina in July of 2012. The tennis courts at Garden Park needed restriping and pickelball lines were included at that time. Today pickelball is played seasonally at Garden Park on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays from 9 to11 a.m. on the two courts. The level of play at Garden Park is beginner to intermediate play. Since 2012 the number of requests to the Parks & Recreation Department for information about both indoor and outdoor locations has increased. There are currently 25 to 30 players committed to playing weekly on the two courts at Garden Park. If the Garden Park courts aren’t being used by tennis players, they are available for pickleball, but the lack of dedicated pickleball courts definitely limits play in Edina. This spring the tennis courts at Garden Park will be restriped to accommodate four pickleball courts on the footprint of the two tennis courts. This will require the purchase of four portable pickleball nets. Dedicated pickelball courts will provide significantly more available time and give a tremendous opportunity to introduce the game to more players. Currently advanced players go to Eden Prairie to play. These courts will provide an opportunity for more residents to play in Edina. Time will also be dedicated for youth play, lessons and clinics as well as promoting times and/or activities for STAFF REPORT Page 3 intergenerational play. Tournaments with all skill levels, ladder leagues, and pickleball get-togethers would make this facility a great addition to the community. The project has already received the permit from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the project was put out to bid in January 2016, with a bid opening date of Jan. 28, 2016. Ten companies submitted bids ranging from a high bid of $215,444.89 to the low bid of $146,173.29. The donation will cover the cost of constructing the courts. The city will provide funding for the following services: Project management $9,281.05 Public Service Professionals Design, engineering and permitting $50,456.90 Bolton Menk Geotechnical evaluation $5,255.00 Braun Intertec Surveying and staking $5,000.00 Estimate Only – To be determined Construction contingency $20,000 If needed TOTAL $89,992.95 This city portion of the funding will come from money left over from the 2015 CIP for projects that were completed under budget. Tim Barnes, Facility Manager will provide construction supervision. Public Sector Professionals was hired to act as a project manager for this project due to the work load in the Parks & Recreation Department and the interest of the donor in getting this project completed as quickly as possible. According to the Donation, Sponsorship and Advertising Policy that was approved by the City Council on Nov. 18, 2014, the donor would receive the following recognition: $100,000 or more (Platinum) • Letter of appreciation from Mayor • Donation listed in annual About Town Report • Listed as platinum sponsor on publicly displayed donor board at City Hall or appropriate city facility • Engraved plaque of appreciation presented by Mayor, City Manager or other city official at an appropriate event (ribbon cutting ceremony, facility or event opening or City Council meeting). ------ - -- EDGE OF HARD COURT SURFACE 150 --- •RAINTILE CLEANOUT T465 2 -1.362.313 I \CENTER OF PEDESTRIAN GATE I SOUTH FENCE UNE SHADE AREA TRAIL LAYOUT -SEE SHEETS 6, , s 134794:24 5'114515., 'L.: WINDSCREEN AsAIREcrsp --- ---------------------------------- ------------------------- ------------------ 0 I z DRAINTILE CLEANOUT T.866.7 .86335 GRADE TO DRAIN TOWARD SOUTH DRAINTILE CLEANOUT T.866.6 1=863.55 1' -------- ,'INSTALL 392 LEA' PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE (TIP) INSTALL POP-UP DRAINAGE EMITTER AND ADAPTER GATE PLACEMENT DETAILS NOT TO SCALE NORTH FENCE UN 853 -862.13 *1- 5.5' PROTECTTREE 0 " DAYLIGHT @40 . N. N. N. N. N. N. N 134704.79 E 511284.1 PG 866.20 N 134704.82 511296.13 PC 868.30 / —7 I CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH PRIVATE UTILITY OWNERS TO // ROYAL BLUE AVOID CON FlICTS WITH PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. 0 INSTALL 36" PEDESTRIAN GATE 3, CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS & ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING WATERMAIN, SANITARY SEWER, & STORM SEWER AS BM=872.73 NAVD 88 INSTALL WINDSOCK AND FRAME ON FENCE POST NECESSARY. GRASS GREEN MND UT X TOWN A 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE AN INDEPENDENT MATERIALS TESTING AGENCY TO PERFORM TESTING AS REWIRED IN SPECIFICATIONS MNDOT R/W S. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING TENNIS COURTS. S. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A TEMPORARY PERMEABLE PAVERS CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROUTE AS NECESSARY. OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ------- ------------- —5.5 /3_1CDN. 8 NIENIK, INC Consultng Engineer. t Surveyors \ LEA KR MN MIIIMONT, MN SLEEPY CV. MN BIJANSVILLMAN WILLMAR MN CHASM MN ItAAASCY. MN MAPLEWOOD,. CAM. MN 1100.72PAIN WU, SPENCE.. DES MOINE.. PARG.NO EDINA, MINNESOTA ROSLAND PARK PICKLEBALL COURTS GRADING & LAYOUT PLAN 8SNEET 9 SCA. FELT on. e. 701,,,11.111$ naserrea ‘01,024,17141101104.11.103.0.0vg 10,7•47, CENTER OF PEDESTRIAN GATE ---------- - Ltt %Li/114794.83' 'LEL:511296;70, \ PG.:86630/ ID SCR 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 14, 2015 7 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Gieseke called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good Student Members present: Chowdhury, Colwell. Absent: Member Segreto III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Good made a motion, seconded by Member Jacobson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Cella made a motion, seconded by Member Strother, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes – Regular Park Board Meeting of Tuesday, June 9, 2015 Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood, commented on the Strategic Plan. She feels Edina falls behind national norms as far as having indoor recreational space. She is concerned about equity as far as locations of parks. She requested the community center recommendation stay in the final report. She feels the council should consider the resident’s requests. A copy of her statement will be included in Park Board correspondence. VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Proposed Pickleball Court Donation Ms. Kattreh indicated the Park Board has been asked to review and comment on a potential donation of Pickleball courts and related amenities at Rosland Park. Edina resident Bruce Mooty has approached the city to donate funds to the City of Edina to construct pickleball courts adjacent to the tennis courts at Rosland Park. The proposed donation is in honor of his late father John Mooty, who passed away earlier this year. This location is recommended by Parks & 2 Recreation Administrative staff and Park Maintenance staff. Several sites were reviewed, including Lewis Park, Yorktown Park and Cornelia School Park. This site was chosen due to the size of parcel available, proximity to a tennis facility, distance from residential impact and on- street parking available. If approved, the donor is interested in funding the project for construction this fall. This project would include four to six pickleball courts, one or two shade structures and potentially court lighting. There would also be benches and trash receptacles. The site was explored for the potential of adding a restroom and picnic shelter facility similar to Wooddale Park, but the lack of proximity to sewer and water connections made this option not financially viable (over $100,000). Ms. Kattreh noted four to six courts could fit on this site and pointed out there is a large oak tree in this area, but the courts could be located so as to not impact this tree. Ms. Kattreh gave a brief Pickleball explanation. The proposed project timeline is as follows: July – Park Board provides review and comment July – Bolton and Menk are completing site evaluation and project designs August – Solicit quotes for construction and donor acceptance August/September – City Council approval August – Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Approval September/October – Construction Ms. Kattreh indicated a battery of four Pickleball courts side by side would cost approximately $70,000. A battery of four courts with two courts over two courts would cost approximately $75,000. A battery of just two courts would cost approximately $39,000. Included in this price are a 6” limestone base, 2” of asphalt, color surface system, striping, nets, posts, fencing and gates. Site preparation grading and watershed accommodations will be required at an additional cost. Mr. Mooty is also considering shade structures and court lighting. According to the Donation, Sponsorship and Advertising Policy that was approved by the City Council on Nov. 18, 2014, the donor would receive one of the following recognitions, depending upon the total project cost: $50,000 - $99,000 (Gold) $100,000 or more (Platinum) Chair Gieseke asked if there would be benches to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes. Ms. Kattreh commented that the nearest restrooms would be just past the playground and added the Art Center could also be an option. Chair Gieseke asked if the lights could also light the tennis courts. Ms. Kattreh stated they will get quotes on various lighting options. Member Cella asked if the Pickleball courts at Garden Park would remain to which Ms. Kattreh replied yes and added they are well used. She also noted Pickleball is very popular in Edina and they may even need more courts in the future. Member Cella asked if Pickleball courts 3 were in the plan for the future without this donor. Ms. Kattreh replied from a cost perspective there could be some funds in operational budgets to restripe. Member Good stated it seems the courts are needed. Ms. Kattreh pointed out Pickleball has a multi-generational appeal and noted this could be programmed significantly in the Parks & Recreation Department. She added that ongoing maintenance of these new courts would come out of the parks maintenance department. Member McCormick asked if courts are scheduled. Ms. Kattreh responded it would be a combination of scheduled and open courts as well as the parking lot would be available along with on-street parking. Member Jones asked if Pickleball courts can be used for other sports. Ms. Kattreh stated they could be converted to tennis or basketball courts. The donation would cover 100% of the construction costs. Member Jones asked what the maintenance costs would be and Ms. Kattreh stated she did not know but could research estimates. Member Jones asked what the lifespan of the courts would be because her concern is when adding things to parks she would like to see the development of community sports. She noted she has a concern on this location as it does not have restrooms or water and requested staff researches other areas. Chair Gieseke stated the St. Cloud courts look very nice and asked if we would have wind screens like St. Cloud has around the courts. Ms. Kattreh replied that is something that would be included in the quotations and discuss with the donor. Member McCormick noted the restrooms are a distance away and asked about porta-potties. Ms. Kattreh stated that will be discussed. Member Jones stated the board is very appreciative of this type of donation as they are financing the construction 100% and it fits well within the Strategic Plan. The senior citizens have been requesting amenities and these courts will fit well for them. Ms. Kattreh added she will make sure budgets will include maintenance. VI.B. Park Board Retreat – Tuesday, Aug. 11, 5:30 – 9:30 p.m. at Centennial Lakes Park Member McCormick informed the Park Board that Chair Gieseke and herself have been planning the Park Board retreat which will replace the regular Aug. 11 Park Board meeting. This retreat will take place at the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park. It is scheduled to run from 5:30 to 9:30 p.m. and dinner will be provided. She added to dress casually because they will be playing bocce at the croquet and lawn games area at Centennial Lakes Park. Member Strother asked if the pre-work needs to be completed prior to the retreat. Member McCormick stated the pre-work is for member preparation only and will not be collected. The Members offered to be on the following groups: Group 1 – Jacobson, Nelson, Strother Group 2 – Jones, Good, Chowdhury 4 Group 3 – Greene, Cella, Colwell Chair Gieseke stated he would like a picture taken at the retreat. VI.C. Proposed Land Exchange – 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina Ms. Kattreh indicated the City Council has requested that the Park Board provide review and comment on a proposed land exchange between the City of Edina and Liz and Tony Burger, the property owners at 6629 West Shore Drive, Edina. The Planning Commission will also be reviewing this proposal at the July 22 Planning Commission meeting. Tony and Liz Burger were present at the meeting. Ms. Kattreh explained the situation to the Park Board. Ed Hayward, 6625 W. Shore Dr., indicated he is the neighbor to the north and stated they are not happy about the proposed public access running along the side of his property. It seems like a strange configuration for a land swap and he would rather see a variance. He added there is another access to the park that can be used. He pointed out he is not opposed to the concept of the land exchange. Member Good asked Mr. Hayward if there is a lot of activity in the park behind the houses and Mr. Hayward stated there generally is not much activity except for the Fourth of July fireworks. Member Jones asked if the access was not right on property line and moved onto the Burger property would that be better. Mr. Hayward stated that does not seem very feasible and noted mowing would be a concern and awkward. Ms. Kattreh stated the Burgers do have the option of applying for a variance with the Planning Commission. Member Good asked if there was an option of having the city sell a piece of land to the Burgers instead of a swap. Ms. Kattreh stated it has not been a popular option historically with the Park Board or with the City Council as they do not want to sell parkland. Chair Gieseke stated in this case the city may benefit from selling some of the park land as it would be a win for the city. Member Nelson asked if there is another area that could be considered in the swap. Ms. Kattreh stated this portion was brought to staff by the Burgers. She noted they could start over and look at all options again. Mr. Burger indicated the surveyor came up with the line drawing and noted they wanted to keep the park continuous. He commented it is not a highly used park except for the Fourth of July. 5 Member Greene asked Mr. Burger if he would be interested in purchasing a piece of park land to which Mr. Burger replied he would. Member Greene suggested the discussion end right now and staff goes back to determine a fair selling price and have Mr. Burger come back with a revised plan. Member Jones asked how many times a request has been made to purchase park land and Ms. Kattreh stated it’s happened approximately four times in four years. Member Jones asked if a precedent would be set and Ms. Kattreh stated she has heard from council and the city does not have a strong interest in selling park property. Other neighbors may want the same thing; a little more park land to add to their property. Member Strother suggested a variance may be more suitable to eliminate people walking very closely to the homes when entering the park. Ms. Burger stated that piece of land is called a breezeway. It’s not supposed to be a stopping place for people entering the park. Mr. Burger stated since he has lived there approximately six to seven people have walked through that area. Member Jones asked if the property floods and Mr. Burger stated they have had some flooding in the garage; the park land does not flood. Member Jones asked if there is a path along the lake to which it was noted there is an open area off of 66th Street. Mr. Burger informed the Park Board they mow and irrigate the area and that the city stops mowing at the Hayward’s property line. Member Jones asked if this would be an appropriate place for a nature path. Ms. Kattreh stated she is not aware that that option has ever been explored and added she does not want a misaligned lot line. Member McCormick asked if Mr. Burger if he was ok with the repositioning of the play structure. Mr. Burger stated the play structure is already on park property and he would have no problem moving it. Ms. Kattreh stated staff’s recommendation was difficult due to precedence, gaining access for the city, and the way the property line is configured it is challenging. It is neither hurting the city nor providing a benefit. Ms. Kattreh pointed out she needs to report back to the Planning Commission and would like to get a consensus from the Park Board. Member Nelson indicated she would prefer going with the variance. Member Jones indicated she can appreciate the situation but does not want to set a precedent and is against selling park land. She does not agree with the proposed swap with creating a jagged lot line to the east and that connectivity to West Shore Drive would be her preference. She would like to refer to a guiding principle and if a variance is given a pathway should be created from Laguna Drive to 66th Street either by land swap or a variance. 6 Member Jacobson indicated this is a grey area whether it is a park or not because if it is truly parkland the residents should have access. She does not care for the land swap and would prefer a sale but she does not feel it is up to the Park Board to decide that. She would favor selling the land to the Burgers and create access from Laguna Drive. She added the variance process would serve well. Member Greene indicated he is in favor of the variance. Chair Gieseke indicated he is in favor of the variance and is not in favor of a land swap as there are many issues with it; the neighbors would not appreciate it and it would set a precedent. He noted a minimal land sale would be an option and would make the access at Laguna better. Member Cella indicated this isn’t really something the Park Board should approve. She is in favor of making all park land accessible to residents and stated this is more a Planning Commission matter to decide if a variance is to be granted. Member Strother indicated she has concerns with a variance and is concerned this park with a lake is not accessible to residents. She does not think a variance would benefit the city. She stated she does not know the history of swaps and/or sales in the past but if the money from the sale could be used to improve access she would be in favor of that. Member McCormick indicated this is a unique situation and does not make a lot of sense. She feels the Burgers should determine how much park land would be needed to make their plan a reality and have the city look at a possible sale. She would be in favor of a variance or make the swap without the jagged lines. Member Good indicated if the Burgers have an interest in pursuing a variance they should do so and it is not the expertise of the Park Board. He would not be in favor of the swap as it is proposed. He would be in favor of a sale. Student Member Colwell indicated Student Member Asef and himself would be in favor of selling the park land. He believes a trail could be put in without infringing on the homeowner’s property and that a partial swap might be possible. Student Member Chowdhury indicated he does not see what the park land would be used for in the future and does not think a precedent would be set. Chair Gieseke stated he likes the idea of a much smaller land swap because it is less obtrusive with compensation for the city. VII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENT Member Jones stated she would like to comment on what is going on with Grandview. She indicated the latest round of proposals have a fairly large community area bringing the senior 7 center and art center facilities at Grandview. The city will work on the design of that building. She commented after creating the Strategic Plan she is concerned about how that space is going to be used so that it fits with the Strategic Plan which includes the senior center and the art center. She is concerned about what is edited out of the Strategic Plan. The City Council will be deciding something on this in August. Ms. Kattreh stated at the June 17, 2015 City Council meeting a presentation was made on the Strategic Plan; however, the council did not have sufficient time to review the plan in detail and is concerned about the length of the document. She stated the document will be reviewed by the council and they will notify her when they are ready to provide feedback. Member Good stated that is his understanding. The Park Board is a recommending group rather than an approving board on items such as Grandview. He also noted the executive summary for the Strategic Plan should be on the website rather than the 400 page document. Member Nelson stated an important thing to consider is the maintenance of the existing parks and structures. VIII. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh provided the following staff updates: • The Braemar Driving Range and Par Three groundbreaking was held today; the project should be completed by the end of September. • The backyard construction at Braemar Arena should be done this week. • The Edina Soccer Club has invited the Park Board to their event on Friday. • The Pamela Park building is up. Member Good asked about a new sign for Braemar Golf Course. Ms. Kattreh stated the sign has been ordered and requires six weeks for production. IX. ADJOURNMENT Chair Gieseke made a motion, seconded by Member Greene, to adjourn the meeting. Ayes: Members Nelson, Jones, Jacobson, Greene, Gieseke, Cella, Strother, McCormick, and Good. Motion approved. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-35 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Parks & Recreation: Melvin R. Mooty & Sally R. Mooty Family Foundation And John W. Mooty Foundation Trust Donating: $150,000.00 For: Pickleball Court Complex at Rosland Park Dated: March 15, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 15, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase, Rosland Park Pickleball Courts, McNamara Construction Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve McNamara Construction to construct the pickleball courts at Rosland Park. INTRODUCTION: A public bid opening was held on Thursday, January 28th for the Rosland Park pickleball courts. Ten companies submitted bids for the project. McNamara Construction was the low bidder and is the staff recommended bidder. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase - Rosland Park Pickleball Courts Pickleball court Bid Results City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 March 15, 2016 Mayor and City Council ☐ ☒ Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Rosland Park Pickleball Courts January 28, 2016 March 27, 2016 McNamara Contracting, Inc. $146,173.29 Recommended Quote or Bid: McNamara Contracting, Inc. - $146,173.29 Information/Background: The Rosland Park pickleball court project is a 5-court pickleball court complex which would be located immediately to the west of the tennis courts at Rosland Park. The scope of the project includes grading, drainage and draintile, a permeable paver trail with connection to the tennis court, asphalt, court surfacing, 8’ vinyl coated chain link fencing, windscreen for fencing, posts, nets and a windsock. There were a total of 10 bidders on this project ranging from a high bid of $215,444.89 to the low bid of $146,173.29. The cost of the construction of the court complex will be covered through a generous $150,000 donation from the families of Paul and Bruce Mooty, who are donating in honor of their parents. The Mootys are making the donation for the court complex to the Edina Community Foundation through the Melvin R. Mooty & Sally R. Mooty Family Foundation and John W. Mooty Foundation Trust. Rosland Park is a very active park with a variety of different activities for residents to enjoy. There is a tennis court adjacent to the site which is well used by kids and adults. It is adjacent to a very popular walking path around Lake Cornelia. This path leads to parking and restroom facilities. There is no immediately adjacent parking lot or restroom facility. The closest parking lot at Rosland Park is .17 miles away. The closest restroom facility is also at Rosland Park comfort station which is .24 miles REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 from the pickleball court. On-street parking is an option. We applied for and received a permit from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for this project. Pickleball is a growing sport both nationally and locally. This will be our first dedicated pickleball court facility in Edina. Bolton & Menk, Inc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS Mankato – Fairmont – Sleepy Eye – Burnsville – Willmar - Chaska – Ramsey – Maplewood – Baxter –Rochester MN Ames –Spencer, IA & Fargo, ND BID TABULATION Rosland Park Pickleball Courts City of Edina Contract No. 16-1PK Edina, MN T16.110316 Bid Taken: Thursday, January 28, 2016 Addendums: #1 - 01/21/16 Time: 11:00 a.m. #2 - 01/26/16 BIDDERS TOTAL AMOUNT BID 1. McNamara Contracting, Inc. $146,173.29 2. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $180,174.40 3. Rachel Contracting, Inc. $183,689.55 4. Tennis West, LLC $187,927.00 5. New Look Contracting $190,477.75 6. Sunram Construction, Inc. $193,273.00 7. G.L. Construction, Inc. $194,954.90 8. Minnesota Roadways Co. $208,976.45 9. Max Steininger, Inc. $212,544.05 10. Peterson Companies, Inc. $215,444.89 Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution Nol. 2016-38 Accepting Various Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve resolution. INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res. 2016-38 Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2016-38 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Parks & Recreation Art Center: Christina Rice Corks, Art Supplies for Children Peter H. Sammond Roll of Canvass & Stretchers Dated: March 15, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 15, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Ross Bintner P.E - Environmental Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Advisory Communication, Energy & Environment Commission: Green Purchasing Policy Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. INTRODUCTION: The attached advisory communication was approved by the Energy and Environment Commission at its February 11, 2016 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Purchasing Policy EEC Advisory Communication Date: February 11, 2016 To: City Council From: Energy and Environment Commission Subject: Green Purchasing Policy Action Requested: Direct staff to provide Council and the EEC Green Purchasing Policy annual report or rescind the City Green Purchasing Policy. Situation: As part of the GreenStep Cities program, the City Council of Edina adopted a Green Purchasing Policy on 3/20/2012. The policy was one of the final Best Practices which allowed Edina to become a Step 3 GreenStep City on 6/10/2012. Background: The Purchasing Policy called for annual reporting by City Staff on the implementation and effectiveness of the Purchasing Policy. This report is to be given to the City Manager, the EEC and the Edina City Council. This was the only GreenStep best practice that called for on-going activity by the City staff. Assessment: The EEC received a report on 1/09/2014 for 2012 and 2013. The EEC does not know if Council ever received this report. The EEC has made repeated informal and formal requests for the annual report for 2014 in order for the City of Edina to fulfill the spirit and the letter of the City green purchasing policy. The EEC therefore sends the Advisory Resolution to the City Council: Whereas, the City of Edina has publicized its achievement of becoming a Step 3 GreenStep City. And whereas, the City of Edina in a number of documents has proclaimed it will take a leadership role in improving the environment. And whereas, the city green purchasing policy is the only part of the GreenStep City program that requires on-going activity by the City itself The EEC advises Council that the failure to have an annual staff report on the Page 2 implementation and effectiveness of the City’s green purchasing policy in 2014 means that the City of Edina is out of compliance with both its own Council resolution and the spirit of the GreenSteps City program. The EEC thus believes that Edina no long meets GreenStep Cities Best Practice 15 and asks staff to withdraw that Best Practice from the GreenStep Cities self-reporting. Recommendation: The EEC requests that Council either direct staff to provide Council and the EEC the specified annual report or rescind the City Green Purchasing Policy. Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Heather Branigin, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. INTRODUCTION: Correspondence received since the last council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondence One 3.15.2016 Correspondence Two 3.15.2016 Heather Branigin From: Lisa Nelson <lisanelson50@mac.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 2:59 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Grandview TIF District We are opposed to creating a TIF District in the Grandview area. This is prime real estate and there is no way that this property would remain undeveloped "but for" the incentive of a TIF District. Furthermore, the density of development being proposed in connection with this TIF proposal is too great and is far greater than what the community had been led to expect, or had shown support of, or is contained in the city's master plans. But, regardless of the density or the use to which the property might be put, a TIF district is wrong for Edina. VOTE NO! Lisa Nelson & Peter Komarek 6225 Knoll Drive Edina, MN 55436 952-936-2278 Heather Branigin From: Duininck, Adam <Adam.Duininck@metc.state.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:23 PM To: Duininck, Adam Subject: Details, Address for 3/4/16 HUD Event Dear Mayors, Community Leaders, and Partners: We wanted to provide some additional information regarding the March 4 event. Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. The event will start promptly at 9:00 a.m. and end at 12:30 p.m. Everyone should be seated by 8:55 a.m. This invitation is non-transferable by you. We will begin the day with remarks by HUD Secretary Julian Castro, Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges, and myself. Together, we will kick off a Mayors' roundtable discussion about the best ways to increase access to opportunity in all of the communities across our region. Additional attendees will have the opportunity to listen to the Mayors' discussion and provide your feedback following the Mayors' roundtable. The Roundtable is scheduled from 9:00 — 10:00 a.m. and is hosted at A-Mill Artists Lofts 315 SE Main St, Minneapolis, MN 55414. Immediately following the Roundtable, all attendees are invited to participate in two additional sessions. First, Ms. Harriet Tregoning, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development will lead a discussion on HUD's new Prosperity Playbook initiative and how we in the Twin Cities region can contribute our best practices to national discussions of prosperity and opportunity. The final session will be led by Mr. Bryan Greene, General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development who will share more detailed information on promoting access to opportunity through the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Rule. This session will include a facilitated discussion about strategies for even stronger regional collaboration around fair housing. HUD staff will also be on hand to answer technical questions about effective engagement on AFFH. We encourage you to remain with us throughout the morning to contribute to the in-depth conversations on these important topics. We recognize that the date of this event competes with several community events, but hope you will be able to take this time to contribute to this important conversation. Seating is limited so if you have not already, please RSVP by March 3rd at noon. RSVP here: htt bitly/10,89fbh. For questions, please contact Jennifer O'Rourke, Metropolitan Council Director of Community Relations: jennifer.orourke@metc.state.mn.us or 651-602-1576. The closest bus stops to the event are at the corners of University Ave SE and 4th Avenue SE and Central Avenue SE and 2nd Street SE. Reserved event parking for A-Mill Artists Lofts is available at a surface lot with an entrance on SE 3rd Avenue between 2nd Street SE and University Avenue SE. Please enter A-Mill Artist Lofts at its 315 SE Main Street entrance. I look forward to seeing you on the 4th. Adam Duininck Chair, Metropolitan Council 1 Heather Branigin From: jennifer@minnesotarealty.net Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 11:56 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Jennifer Hennemuth Organization: Website: Address_1: Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: iennifer@minnesotarealty.net Phone: 612-237-4237 Referrer: google Message: Please forward to appropriate parties. March 2nd, 2016 RE: City Council Meeting/Grandview TIF To Whom It May Concern, I would like to make an objection to the proposed TIF development within the Grandview area. I do not believe TIF development in this area would meet the 'but for' test and I believe that approving any development in this project area as a TIF is a huge disadvantage to the city and residents. It will ultimately create a burden upon the tax payer and is not beneficial to the city, nor does it provide an efficient long term plan for the city that would not reasonably already exist without a TIF incentive to developers. Sincerely, Jennifer Hennemuth Edina Resident 1 Heather Branigin From: John Hamilton <johnh6125@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:21 PM To: rdcjmiller@comcast.net Miller; Chris Bremer Cc: Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); James Hovland Subject: Xerxes Ave Bumpouts Dimensions Hello All; It seemed after the meeting yesterday that staff was at least in part convinced that the landscaped boulevards could not work because there is not adequate dimension across Xerxes to accommodate traffic, bikes, and boulevards. I checked my dimensions again this morning and that does not appear to be true to me. Back of curb to back of curb the street is 42 feet wide. In the current design, the county is pushing the bike path into the parking lane by 3'-6". The traffic requires 11'-0" per lane, the bike lane is 4'-0" wide leaving 6'-0" for the boulevard (including the curb) in the worst case. Through four blocks on the Minneapolis side, from 56th to 60th, there is already a four foot wide space between the curb and the sidewalk so a landscaped boulevard of ten feet in width (minus 6" for the curb) is available. From 60th to Crosstown on the Minneapolis side there is an 18" space between the sidewalk and the curb allowing a 7'-0" planting space. On the Edina side through the entire length, the planting bed is reduced to 5'-6" from the edge of the sidewalk to the back of the new curb; more would be better but that is enough to get the right tree variety to thrive. On the Minneapolis side now there are 25 year old ash trees in the four foot wide boulevard, a foot and a half narrower than any boulevards we are proposing. Please help me to understand what I might do next to further this effort. John Hamilton 612-889-7193 Heather Branigin From: Chris Bremer <cbremer101@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:02 PM To: John Hamilton Cc: rdcjmiller@comcast.net Miller; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); James Hovland Subject: Re: Xerxes Ave Bumpouts Dimensions This is good news, John. We all agreed that car and bike traffic need adequate space, so now we know that this requirement does not preclude boulevards. Thank you for checking the measurements. Chris Sent from my iPad On Mar 2, 2016, at 5:20 PM, John Hamilton <johnh6125@gmail.com> wrote: Hello All; It seemed after the meeting yesterday that staff was at least in part convinced that the landscaped boulevards could not work because there is not adequate dimension across Xerxes to accommodate traffic, bikes, and boulevards. I checked my dimensions again this morning and that does not appear to be true to me. Back of curb to back of curb the street is 42 feet wide. In the current design, the county is pushing the bike path into the parking lane by 3'-6". The traffic requires 11 '-0" per lane, the bike lane is 4'-0" wide leaving 6'-0" for the boulevard (including the curb) in the worst case. Through four blocks on the Minneapolis side, from 56th to 60th, there is already a four foot wide space between the curb and the sidewalk so a landscaped boulevard of ten feet in width (minus 6" for the curb) is available. From 60th to Crosstown on the Minneapolis side there is an 18" space between the sidewalk and the curb allowing a 7'-0" planting space. On the Edina side through the entire length, the planting bed is reduced to 5'-6" from the edge of the sidewalk to the back of the new curb; more would be better but that is enough to get the right tree variety to thrive. On the Minneapolis side now there are 25 year old ash trees in the four foot wide boulevard, a foot and a half narrower than any boulevards we are proposing. Please help me to understand what I might do next to further this effort. John Hamilton 612-889-7193 1 Heather Branigin From: Jennifer Janovy <jjanovy@outlook.com> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 9:05 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Council Comments -- please forward to City Council Dear Council members: There are bigger issues and smaller issues, and this is probably a smaller issue, but I wanted to bring it to your attention. The Mayor and Council Comments section of the regular meeting agenda has become quite long-19 minutes on average over the past five meetings. In large part this is due to Council members sharing information about items from their personal calendars. I imagine residents have varied perspectives on whether this information is valuable. I do think that Mayor and Council Comments can serve a valuable purpose. For example, this section of the agenda provides a time for Council members to bring forward issues they would like to have placed on a future agenda, or ask questions and address concerns raised by residents. If a member is the Council's official representative to another body, then this section of the agenda is a time when the member can update the Council on that work. It is also a time when the Council can discuss its own procedures. I don't know that Mayor and Council Comments should be a time to report what happened at meetings or events that Council members attended in a private capacity, unless directly related to Council business. I don't know that it's a time to promote upcoming meetings or events—that really is the responsibility of the Communications Department and, if Council members have concerns that it is not being done adequately, that should be addressed. When watching a meeting live, it isn't possible to skip through these comments to the next part of the agenda. When watching online, it isn't possible to easily skip past individual Council member's comments. Some members do go on for more than five minutes. Everybody's time is valuable. I do think that if you routinely had 20 minutes of Community Comment, you would be looking for ways to limit it. It would be considered too much of an imposition on meeting time. The same thinking may more appropriately apply to Mayor and Council Comments; after all, it is more within your Council role to listen to community members than it is the role of community members to listen to you. The comments can, at times, come off as grandstanding. I do think, however, that the comments often come from a good place— a sincere desire to inform the public. It really is up to the Council to regulate its own procedures, so whether to develop guidelines relating to Mayor and Council Comments is up to you. Thanks for your consideration. Jennifer Janovy INIPNAJI NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION Dear Mayor Hovland, Minnesota holds critical habitat for one of the world's most iconic and important species — the Monarch butterfly. Given the habitat needs of these butterflies, cities play a pivotal role in their protection. We are asking Minnesota mayors to take action by joining with many of your colleagues by signing the National Wildlife Federation's Mayors' Monarch Pledge. The migration of Monarch butterffies is one of the natural world's most epic journeys. Each weighing as little as a paper clip, the eastern population of Monarchs flies nearly 3,000 miles from their summer homes in America's backyards and grasslands to wintering grounds in Mexico's mountain forests. The Monarch has seen a 90% decline in population in recent years. Scientists attribute the decline, in part, to degradation and loss of summer breeding habitat in the United States. Monarch caterpillars feed exclusively on milkweed plants which have largely been eradicated along roadsides and in fields. Minnesota holds critical habitat for Monarchs. Monarchs need all of us to make our homes, businesses, schools and community spaces more wildlife-friendly. Municipalities play a critical role in saving the Monarch butterfly by providing Monarch habitat at public parks, median strips, community gardens and municipal buildings. City properties, like recreation centers and libraries, can host demonstration gardens and serve as community hubs where citizens can learn how to help. Educating citizens about how and where to grow milkweed is also a key piece for success. The decline of Monarchs has continued in part because, until now, saving them has been viewed as someone else's job. By joining forces through the Mayors' Monarch Pledge, we are declaring that era over. This pledge declares your support for Monarch habitat restoration and your commitment to encourage all residents to do the same. Mayors taking the pledge must commit to implement at least 3 of 25 action items within a year (see enclosed). This can include actions already implemented but must include at least one new action. We hope you will join us in making Monarch butterfly conservation a priority in your city by taking the Mayors' Monarch Pledge. (www.nwf. org/MayorsMonarchPledge). We will be more than happy to answer any questions you may have, work with you on action steps, and publicize the positive efforts of your city. For more information, please contact either Manja Holland at hollandm@nwf.org or 734-887-7111 or Gary Botzek at Oary@capitolconnections.com or 651- 293-9295. Sincerely, orWJ47 iaA41 Mike Shriberg, Ph.D. Gary Botzek Regional Executive Director, Great Lakes Executive Director The National Wildlife Federation Minnesota Conservation Federation 213 W. Liberty Street, Ste. 200, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1398 Ph 734-769-3351 Fx 734-887-7199 greatlakes@nwf org www.nwf.org/greatlakes NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION Mayors' Monarch Pledge The monarch butterfly is an iconic North American species whose multigenerational migration and metamorphosis from caterpillar to butterfly has captured the imagination of millions of Americans. We, the undersigned mayors and local government chief executives, are deeply concerned about the decline of the monarch butterfly population. Twenty years ago, more than one billion Eastern monarch butterflies migrated to Mexico. In the winter of 2014, only 60 million made the trip. The North American monarch population has declined by more than 90 percent in the past two decades. Monarch scientists attribute the decline to degradation and loss of summer breeding habitat in the U.S., and loss of winter habitat in Mexico. Western populations of monarch butterflies that overwinter in California are also in decline. Cities, towns and counties have a critical role to play to help save the monarch butterfly. Municipalities in particular can provide habitat at public parks, median strips, community gardens and municipal buildings that serve as community hubs such as recreation centers and libraries. Schools, homes and businesses can all provide essential habitat for monarchs too. Simple changes in landscaping ordinances or school policies can make a big difference for the monarch. Educating citizens about how and where to grow milkweed is also a key piece of the puzzle. Creating habitat and educating citizens will benefit other pollinators that need healthy habitat as well. When mayors speak up and take a stand, citizens notice. Therefore, we hereby commit to help restore habitat for the monarch and encourage our citizens to do the same, so that these magnificent butterflies will once again flourish across the continent. Sign the pledge at www.nwtorg/mavorsmonarchpledge ### 41111Ar4pAn NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION Mayors' Monarch Pledge Action Items Mayors and local government chief executives who have taken the Mayors' Monarch Pledge must commit to implement at least three of the 25 following action items within a year of taking the pledge. At least one action must be taken from the "Program & Demonstration Gardens" section. Mayors and local government chief executives taking more than eight actions will receive special recognition as part of the National Wildlife Federation's Mayors' Monarch Leadership Circle. NWF will follow up with all mayoral points of contact with a quarterly survey (1/1, 4/1, 7/1, 10/1) to monitor progress. Please visit www.nwf.org/mavorsmonarchpledge to take the pledge and access resources. Communications & Convening: 1) Issue a Proclamation to raise awareness about the decline of the monarch butterfly and the species' need for habitat. 2) Launch a public communication effort to encourage citizens to plant monarch gardens at their homes or in their neighborhoods. 3) Communicate with community garden groups and urge them to plant native milkweeds and nectar-producing plants. 4) Convene city park and public works department staff and identify opportunities for revised mowing programs and milkweed / native nectar plant planting programs. 5) Convene a meeting with gardening leaders in the community to discuss partnerships to support monarch butterfly conservation. Program & Demonstration Gardens: 6) Host or support a native plant sale or milkweed seed giveaway event. 7) Facilitate or support a milkweed seed collection and propagation effort. 8) Plant a monarch-friendly demonstration garden at City Hall or another prominent location. 9) Convert abandoned lots to monarch habitat. 10) Plant milkweed and native nectar plants in medians and public rights-of-way. 11) Launch a program to plant native milkweeds and nectar plants in school gardens by engaging students, teachers and the community. 12) Earn recognition for being a wildlife-friendly city by expanding your action plan to include other wildlife and habitat conservation efforts through a program like the NWF Community Wildlife Habitat program 13) Create a monarch neighborhood challenge to engage neighborhoods and homeowners' associations within the city to create habitat for the monarch butterfly. 14) Initiate or support citizen-science efforts that help monitor monarch migration and health. 15) Add milkweed and nectar producing plants in community gardens. 16) Expand invasive species removal programs to make it possible to re-establish native milkweed - and nectar plants to the landscape. 17) Host or support a city monarch butterfly festival. Systems Change: 18) Remove milkweed from the list of noxious plants in city weed! landscaping ordinances (if applicable). 19) Change weed or mowing ordinances to allow for native prairie and plant habitats. 20) Increase the percentage of native plants, shrubs and trees that must be used in city landscaping ordinances and encourage use of milkweed where appropriate. 21) Direct city property managers to consider the use of native milkweed and nectar plants at city properties where appropriate. 22) Integrate monarch butterfly conservation into the city's Park Master Plan, Sustainability Plan, Climate Resiliency Plan or other city plans. 23) Change landscape ordinances to support integrated pest management and reduced use of pesticides andinsecticides. 24) Adopt pesticides practices that are not harmful to pollinators. 25) California Specific: Pass a resolution to protect over-wintering monarch butterfly habitat on public and private lands. 1,(\a-IN.K. uaero, CA-Q C-J\IN\911°1 11-ACr\ UeY"' °ffit - fj\7" LTC- e10\7 . Heather Branigin From: Chris Bremer <cbremer101@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 1:20 PM To: John Hamilton Cc: rdcjmiller@comcast.net Miller; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); James Hovland Subject: Re: Xerxes Ave Bumpouts Dimensions I understand the city has no identified funds for this project, so I sincerely hope we can find a way to partner with Hennepin County; we have been successful in getting them to acknowledge the fact that the design choices they made on Xerxes were not acceptable. Now we need to convince them to fund a better answer. The unfortunate placement of the bumpouts (such as the one that forces an Edina resident to back out directly into the traffic lane) and unprecedented use of delineator posts on concrete islands suggest that their design process was at best not site-specific. From Mr. Grube's comments, it is clear that Xerxes Avenue was an experiment conducted by Hennepin County engineers that won't be tried again. Thank you once again for attending the meeting on Monday and continuing your interest in finding good solutions. I thought the ideas put forth about having lighted bollards that might even incorporate public art were quite interesting, and I greatly appreciate the creative thinking and attention to detail. By combining John Hamilton's thoughtful design for landscaped bumpouts along with some bumpout islands with attractive bollards, we can have an affordable upgrade to the street that Edina and Minneapolis residents can be proud of in the coming decades. I do think the time has come for the County to find a way to design and fund an appropriate solution. We have all worked hard to get to the point where they understand our concerns; now we need to finalize the plan for changes and set a timetable for the remediation. I realize this might require some additional time from our busy city staff members as well, and want to convey my sincere thanks again to everyone as we work towards a good outcome. Best regards, Chris On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:20 PM, John Hamilton <johnh6125Agmail.eom> wrote: Hello All; It seemed after the meeting yesterday that staff was at least in part convinced that the landscaped boulevards could not work because there is not adequate dimension across Xerxes to accommodate traffic, bikes, and boulevards. I checked my dimensions again this morning and that does not appear to be true to me. Back of curb to back of curb the street is 42 feet wide. In the current design, the county is pushing the bike path into the parking lane by 31-6". The traffic requires 111-0" per lane, the bike lane is 41-0" wide leaving 6'-0" for the boulevard (including the curb) in the worst case. Through four blocks on the Minneapolis side, from 56th to 60th, there is already a four foot wide space between the curb and the sidewalk so a landscaped boulevard of ten feet in width (minus 6" for the curb) is available. From 60th to Crosstown on the Minneapolis side there is an 18" space between the sidewalk and the curb allowing a 71-0" planting space. On the Edina side through the entire length, the planting bed is reduced to 51-6" from the edge of the sidewalk to the back of the new curb; more would be better but that is enough to get the right tree variety to thrive. On the Minneapolis side now there are 25 year old ash trees in the four foot wide boulevard, a foot and a half narrower than any boulevards we are proposing. Please help me to understand what I might do next to further this effort. john . 612-889-7193 1 Heather Branigin From: Portia Allen <Portia.Allen@rivervalley.org> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:10 PM To: Brian Olson Cc: Bob Prestrud; James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; Luther Overholt Subject: RE: River Valley Church - Serve Your City Brian, Thank you so much for the response. I look forward to hearing our marching orders. It's going to be GREAT! Thank you for the opportunity to serve! Portia Allen Local Service Projects Director River Valley Church 952.255.8829 rivervalley.org ©portiallen From: Brian Olson [mailto:bolsonPEdinaMN.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 3:48 PM To: Portia Allen Cc: Bob Prestrud; James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; Luther Overholt Subject: RE: River Valley Church - Serve Your City Dear Ms. Allen, Thank you for your continued support of the City of Edina. We would be happy to coordinate another buckthorn removal day at Bredesen Park since last year was such a success but let us meet together as a Staff and see if there is another opportunity to utilize your generosity. Tom Horwath has retired and was replaced with Luther Overholt whom you met last summer. I will be asking him to take the lead on this very important and valuable offer. Thank you and Luther will be getting ahold of you within the next few weeks to arrange for a meeting to discuss options. Sincerely, Brian Brian Olson, Public Works Director 952-826-0311 I Fax 952-826-0392 bolsonnEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Leluning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Portia Allen [mailto:Portia.Allen@rivervalley.orq] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 1:33 PM To: James Hovland; Brian Olson; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Horwath; Bob Prestrud Subject: River Valley Church - Serve Your City Good Afternoon, Gentlemen, River Valley Church is preparing for our focused day of service for the community of Edina. We wanted to ask you to keep us in mind for anything we could do that would be of help to the city. We're looking at Saturday, July 23rd if that works for you all. I anticipate we will have 150 people at a minimum with a very real potential of having 200+ come out for the day. Pastor Anthony, our campus pastor, wanted me to make sure to let you know we are MORE than happy and willing to tackle buckthorn for you again, if that is the need. We have people that were so sorry they missed out. Who knew buckthorn could be so much fun? Thank you for your time. We look forward to working with the City of Edina. Have a great day! Portia Allen Local Service Projects Director River Valley Church 952.255.8829 rivervalley.org @portiallen [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] lnforrnrrtion transrrrrtted by this email is proprietary to River Valley Church and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain i foniiation that is private, privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender and original author immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, store, copy, or forward the information in any medium without the consent of the author. This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to River Valley Church and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed; and may contain information that is private, privileged; confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient: please notify the sender and original author immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person; use it for any purpose, store: copy, or forward the irvformation in any medium without the consent of the author. This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com 2 Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:45 PM To: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1 @gmail.com Cc: Scott H. Neal Subject: Common Sense for Edina - CBRE : 'the suburban commercial real estate market is soaring' The Edina City council's actions defy market forces by voting for a Grandview TIF. David Frenkel CBRE's Freytag and Karkula: Plenty of office activity in the Minneapolis suburbs today Posted By Dan Rafter On March 2, 2016 (4:52 am) In Homepage, Midwest Real Estate News, Minnesota Real Estate Journal, News Urban centers are getting all the press today. But the suburban commercial real estate market is soaring, too, today in the Twin Cities area. Minnesota Real Estate Journal recently spoke with Jim Freytag and Brent Karkula, office brokers with the Minneapolis office of CBRE, about the strength of the suburban office market here. Both brokers agreed: The suburban office market isn't an afterthought today. It's a first choice for many companies. Minnesota Real Estate Journal: We all hear a lot about what office users want when it comes to urban office properties. But what about in the suburbs? What amenities do companies want when they are looking for office space in one of the suburbs? 1 Jim Freytag: We work in the suburbs and some in down Minneapolis and the urban core. We have a pretty good perspective on a whole lot of things. The tenants today are looking for amenities in the suburbs today. It's often about walkability. People want to be near a lot of service amenities. They want their employees to have access to food options over their lunch hours. They want their employees to have access to workout amenities. They want their office buildings to be located near apartments or near hotels for when employees have visitors coming to town. They want entertainment options for after work, restaurants and bars, that type of thing. The most notable area in the suburbs that fits that is the West End area in St. Louis Park. You have the Shops at West End, a number of watering holes, a movie theater. There have also been a number of apartments built in that area. There's a grocery store right there. A lot of office users say they want to be right there. MREJ: What else are office users looking for in the suburbs? Freytag: Many want to be close to some green space. We are marketing one of the new Ryan projects in the Downtown East development, the Millwright building. That building is going to be new construction designed to look like a 100-year-old vintage warehouse building. It will have brown brick and will be pedestrian-friendly. There will be a fourth-floor terrace for green space and best-in-class bike storage on the ground floor of the building. If people want to ride their bikes to work, they can ride them right into the building. There are going to be lockers and showers, too, so you can clean up after yourself. MREJ: So owners are spending more on filling their buildings with amenities? Brent Karkula: Back in the day, building owners might renovate some corridors with new carpeting and wall coverings and wait for market to come to them. They would fill their buildings through increased demand. Now landlords are taking a hard look at the amenity packages and condition of buildings. They are not just spending $100,000 to do this, they are spending millions to reposition these buildings. It is effective. They buy them for a certain price and sink money into the common areas. The rental rate you can offer is still significantly lower than new construction. Freytag: The bad news is that rental rates are going up. The good news is that owners want to provide a work environment so that tenants are feeling better about paying that higher rent. The tenants feel that they are getting some bang for the buck. We as a group, I can think of five different buildings that we have traded recently. The owners are looking at what do we need to do to spiff up the image of these buildings. They want to make them as modern as possible. There is not a lot of new construction happening in the suburbs. Market fundamentals will help push up the occupancy and rental rates because of that. When you couple that with these owners looking to make investments in these assets, you are looking at some good long-term value in the suburbs. Tenants will see some nice office product come out of these improvements. MREJ: It sounds, then, that there is still a solid demand in the Twin Cities market for suburban office products. Freytag: Not everybody wants to or needs to be downtown. Not every company needs to have a location downtown. There is a movement to create a new urban suburban type of development. Suburbs are trying to create their own urban feels. It is possible to create suburban developments that are walkable and that are located near shops and restaurants and other amenities. That is what people are looking for today. Not everyone wants their offices to be downtown. Not everyone has a workforce that is under 35 that wants to walk to work, go to the bars and the head back to work until 10 p.m Karkula: If you are someone like an accounting company, you don't need to be in downtown. You don't want to deal with the headaches that come with being downtown. Healthcare is another industry that is very loyal to the suburbs. United Healthcare has many buildings in Minnetonka and Eden Prairie. Prime Therapeutics stays loyal to the suburbs. Where is your workforce? Where are your labor pools? You then base your decision on that. 2 Heather Branigin From: susan.lauermann@thomsonreuters.com on behalf of rick.king@thomsonreuters.com Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:06 AM To: rick.king@thomsonreuters.com Subject: News from Rick King, your District B Metropolitan Airports Commissioner OMMISSION 4inncapolisSaüit Pad International Aitvort (,31,4o 28tIt SOHO! .554.,:q1.2799. ithon.; (41:2!) March 4, 2016 Subject: News from Rick King, your District B Metropolitan Airports Commissioner (MAC) Welcome to the early Spring 2016 Update. There are two major items I'd like to cover with this update. First, the selection of a new airport Executive Director and second the TSA Security lines. First, as you may have seen from the news reports, the executive committee of the MAC has selected a finalist for the role of Executive Director/CEO of the Airport. Brian Ryks was picked and will be recommended to the Full Commission, which has the final decision, at its meeting on March 21 at 1pm in the MAC Chambers in Terminal 1. Brian has over 30 years of airport experience and is currently the Executive Director/CEO of the airport in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Previously he ran Duluth and St Cloud Airports and worked at the MAC as a noise technician in his early career and is private pilot. See http://www.mornews.orastory/2016/03/03/msp-airport-ceo-recommended for more. The MAC is hosting an Open House on Sunday, March 20 from 2-4pm at the MAC General Offices, 6040 28th Ave. S, Minneapolis. Please join us to meet Brian. Second, the TSA security screening lines at the airport have grown and made the news. In recent weeks, despite opening a new 10-lane security checkpoint, the problem has gotten worse. The two articles below cover the issues pretty well but I want to alert you to the actions the MAC is taking, too. We are working with the TSA to get their staffing, efficiencies, scheduling and processes in better order. The MAC is adding better way-finding and people (non-screeners) to help direct travelers. We also have engaged TSA Administrator Peter Neffenger and our federal delegation to demand Washington get TSA adequately staffed. As the chair of the Management & Operations Committee, I want you to know we will discuss this issue at our meeting Monday, March 7 at 1pm at the MAC Chambers in Terminal 1. This meeting is open to all. 1 http:fistrib.mn/116Mplo. http://strib.mn/1REZ1z1 A final note, we will be dealing with the Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) and taxis in the meetings April and beyond. Be sure to check out the latest reports and to sign up for automatic notification on the MAC web site. • MSP News — Latest information highlights • Monthly MSP Runway Use System Report now available. This report provides a description of the MSP Runway Use System which prioritizes the order that runways are assigned to ensure safety and efficiency. • MSP Noise Oversight o NOC Meeting Packet o MSP Monthly Operations & Noise Reports As always, let me know if I can be of any service to you. By mail: Commissioner Rick King, cio Thomson Reuters, 610 Opperman Drive, D5-N429, Eagan, MN 55123. By phone: 952-960-2902. By email: rick.kinqmspmac.orq. Thanks, 2 Heather Branigin From: Dean Mathews Sr <deansr@marathonfoods.net> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 11:09 AM To: williamallenwebb@gmail.com Cc: IseaUski@gmail.com; Robert Stewart; James Hovland Subject: Lake Edina west shore We live at 7404 West Shore Drive, and are quite dismayed by the seemingly indiscriminate clearing of trees and vegetation between the Lake and Hiway 100. I could not agree more that remediation of some sort is required- extend the wall, AND replant. Frankly, it is quite disappointing that this action was taken without any consultation with those most affected, the Lake Edina neighborhood. Dean Mathews Sr. Marathon Foods 7625 Metro Blvd. Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55439 Cell.. .612-819-4073 Sent from my iPad 4115 Sunnyside Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 March 4, 2016 Mr. James B. Hovland, Mayor Mr. Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Gentlemen: Last September, I wrote you concerning stop signs in the Country Club neighborhood, asking why we have them, because no one complies with them, and the EPD appears to lack the resources to enforce them. Shortly after that, I received a call from Lt. Brian Tholen, who gave me a full explanation of the Police Department's priorities and resources, and said that he had sent a senior patrol officer into the neighborhood, who confirmed my observation, and wrote several warnings and citations. Since then, nothing has changed. Compliance with the stop signs is near zero, and in many cases drivers appear to intentionally disregard them. The intersection of Wooddale and Sunnyside is especially egregious, but by no means unique. I have not seen any enforcement activity in the neighborhood. If there has been any, I have not observed it. As I noted before, having traffic control devices that drivers in the community largely ignore, and lacking police resources (or priority) to enforce them, even if only sporadically, creates a hazardous situation for pedestrians and drivers alike, and fosters disrespect for the traffic laws generally. Once people learn that no sanction applies to bad behavior, they adjust their behavior accordingly. These results are not good for the health of the community. Philosophically, government should not undertake to regulate citizen behavior unless the regulation is well-justified, and government is serious about the effort. I suggest that we would be better off if most of these signs were removed, leaving members of the community to look out for themselves and rely upon their own good sense walking and driving in the neighborhood. Safety would not be compromised for the simple reason that drivers don't stop and in many cases hardly slow down at the stop signs now. Cordially, Andrew Selden 952.926.5373 Heather Branigin From: Kathy Dahlheimer <kdahlheimer@comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2016 2:34 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: PLEASE FORWARD TO PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLATTER AND SUSAN LEE and CITY COUNCIL HELLO....I watched the last planning meeting regarding the project on 66th St. It quickly became painfully clear that Kimley Horne has a conflict of interest in that they are also the designer and have a vested interest in the plan going forward. Also their study was extremely unprofessional including not really dealing with all the projects under plans now and not making it multi modal. In this day and age those concepts would seem even to a layperson like myself to be basic. I really hope the city is NOT paying them full price for this work which now they have to hire another study for and pay for. This is reckless use of our tax $$$...also I think that firm you usually use is WSB who pretty much says no new traffic and collects their check. How about getting a really independent person to look at this entire area not just a mini section as the entire area is being redone and you cannot really just take it so piecemeal. Joanne Olson indicated that this is important and she is on the Southdale group. I think the time is now to be clear on conflicts of interest in the companies that are being hired...this one was almost too obvious and not sure how it got approved. Few engaged commissioners seemed to be feeling that they had the information they needed and I imagine it was not cheap. Kathleen Dahlheimer 1 Heather Branigin From: Ben Thompson <blthompso@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 3:41 PM To: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1 @gmail.com Cc: William Webb; Angie Buyse; January Thompson Subject: Hwy 100 trail Hello, I am writing to express my disappointment over the clearing of trees that has taken place on the west side of Lake Edina along Highway 100 and my concern about that the area designated for the bike trail will not be rebermed before the trail is installed. I believe that the neighborhood has been negatively impacted by the change. I hope you will stand with the Lake Edina neighborhood and our request to either extend the 10' high barrier wall south to West 77th street, or to increase the earth berm all along the trail and replant the lost trees. The highway sound and visibility to the highway have increased significantly since the removal of the trees. Thank you for your consideration. Ben and January Thompson 4924 Poppy Lane 1 Heather Branigin From: Bruce Knutson <bruce@knutson-architects.com > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 1:21 PM To: 'James Hovland'; Cary Teague; James Hovland Cc: Scott H. Neal; Joyce Repya; Cindy Larson; 'Roger Knutson'; Hansen'; 'Paul Hannan'; 'Angie McKinley' Subject: RE: Edina construction signs ordinance Dear Mr Mayor and Cary, Thank you for your thoughtful time response regarding the construction signs regulations. On the second note, we, the AIA residential Architects love to share with you the AIA collaboration and process we have helping residents in St Louis Park, Richfield, Plymouth and Coon Rapids with understanding the design and construction process through a city subsidized AIA Architect 2 hour consultation. Again thank you for your time and consideration. Happy spring! K BRUCE KNUTSON 8101 34th Avenue South #100 Bloomington, MN 55425-1606 612-332-8000 bruce@knutson-architects.com http://www.knutson-architects.com/ https://www.facebook.com/BruceKnutson http://www.houzz.com/proibruce-knutson/bruce-knutson-architects A A 1 From: James Hovland [mailto:jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com] Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 8:22 AM To: Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov>; James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Bruce Knutson, A.I.A. <bruce@knutson-architects.com>; Scott H. Neal <sneal@EdinaMN.gov>; Joyce Repya <1Repya@EdinaMN.gov>; Cindy Larson <CLarson@EdinaMN.gov>; Roger Knutson <RKnutson@ck-law.com> Subject: RE: Edina construction signs ordinance Thanks, Cary. Bruce, is this helpful? Sent from my Verizon \Vireiess 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov> Date: 3/7/2016 9:09 AM (GMT-05:00) To: James Hovland <jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com>, James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: "Bruce Knutson, A.I.A." <bruce@knutson-architects.com>, "Scott H. Neal" <sneal@EdinaMN.gov>, Joyce Repya <JRepya@EdinaMN.gov>, Cindy Larson <CLarson@EdinaMN.gov>, Roger Knutson <RKnutson@ck- law.com> Subject: RE: Edina construction signs ordinance These types of signs are allowed on construction sites up to 6 square feet in size. There is not a limit on the number of signs allowed, as long as they are less than 6 square feet. Below is the Code requirement. I have highlighted the code provision that applies. Please note that it does not limit the number of signs. • Sec. 36-1660. - Temporary construction signs: new buildings. One temporary construction sign may be installed upon a construction site of a new building with ten or more dwelling units or any new nonresidential principal use building denoting the name of the owner, architect, engineer, contractor and lender, provided such sign does not exceed 32 square feet in area. Temporary construction signs measuring six square feet or less in sign area are permitted for new residential buildings of less than ten dwelling units. Temporary construction signs shall be removed upon issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any part of the building. Freestanding signs shall not exceed ten feet in height. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 460.03(7)) Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952-826-0460 Fax 952-826-0389 I Cell 952-826-0236 • 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 • cteaqueEdinaMN.qov I www.EdinaMN.qov/Planninq ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: James Hovland [mailto:jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com] Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 4:26 PM To: James Hovland 2 Cc: Bruce Knutson, A.I.A.; Scott H. Neal; Cary Teague Subject: RE: Edina construction signs ordinance Bruce, this is an interesting idea. I will forward to City folks for consideration. Hope all is well. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G ME smartphon.e Original message From: James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> Date: 3/4/2016 2:27 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Subject: FW: Edina construction signs ordinance Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.ciov I www.EdinaMN.qov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &. Doing Business From: Bruce Knutson [mailto:bruce@knutson-architects.com] Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 12:17 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Edina construction signs ordinance Dear Mr. Mayor I hope all is well with you and your family. During our AIA Residential Architects Committee meeting this week, a troubling issue regarding "construction signs" in Edina was brought to our attention. Please see the letter from Paul Hannan below. I know that you are a great proponent of good architectural design. We believe that construction signs for the Architects firms would enhance to opportunity for potential Edina residents who are contemplating a 3 remodeling or new construction to see the fine work that architects produce. We, the AIA, have Architectural excellence programs with St Louis Park, Plymouth, Coon Rapids and Richfield, where the city sponsored programs subsidizes a 2 hour meeting with an AIA registered architects to help residents define their program and understand the process. We would love to meet with whomever to help define this code and hopefully allow the use of architect's construction signs in the future. We have in the past been involved with the revised remodeling and construction guidelines in Edina and the city of Minneapolis. Happy Spring, I look forward to seeing you again soon. Regards, Br K A A BRUCE KNUTSON 42 8101 34th Avenue South #100 Bloomington, MN 554254606 612-332-8000 brucePknutson-architects.com http://www.knutson-architects.com/ https://www.facebook.com/Brucelinutson http://www.houzz.com/pro/bruce-knutson/bruce-knutson-architects Forwarded Message From: Paul Hannan <phannan@salaarc.corn> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 10:33:29 -0600 To: <CLarson@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Eric J Hansen <eric@ejhansen.com > Conversation: Temporary sign 4 Subject: Temporary sign Hello Ms. Larson, I am the Chairman of the AIA Minnesota Residential Architecture Committee. It is the general practice of architects, and contractors, to place a sign on the lot of the project they are working on. This not only advertises the fine work that the architect does, but also will help potential clients with their decision on whom to hire. It goes without saying that hiring a professional, a licensed architect, will help to ensure that the desires of the owners, the neighborhoods, and the city are met and will continue to add value to the property. It is in the best interest of the city to allow the promotion of good design by licensed professionals as this will help to maintain the desirability of the city and the neighborhoods that make it great. Recently, it has been brought to my attention that there is some confusion regarding your sign ordinance. Sec. 36-1660. - Temporary construction signs: new buildings. States "....Temporary construction signs measuring six square feet or less in sign area are permitted for new residential buildings of less than ten dwelling units..." This does not say total square footage or refer directly to the number of signs. Typically, the project that the architect, the licensed professional, is working on is directly for the owner and not a property for sale. Having had the privilege to have worked on numerous projects in Edina over many years, I have always had my firm's sign up, along with the builder, as well as some others, and have never been told that it is in violation. Our signs are less than 6 square feet which follows the ordinance. Thank you for your attention. I hope this will clarify things. Kind Regards, Paul M. Hannan, AIA SP, LTA SALA ARCHITECTS PAUL HANNAN AIA, CID, PRINCIPAL I T 612.767.4135 I phannannsala arc.com End of Forwarded Message 5 Heather Branig in From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Rob Martin <rob.martin@lakestreetcm.com > Monday, March 07, 2016 9:24 AM James Hovland Susan Faus; Nick Lovejoy get a new activity registration software vendor Item IV_ F_ Req for Purchase MaxGalaxy.pdf Hi Jim - when can you get a refund or fire the current software vendor for kids activities sign up? MaxGalaxy/MaxSolutions is horrible and each time I've tried to sign up for skating for my daughter or summer activities it has crashed and I've not got our desired times despite being online when registration opened. Don't you think the qualifications for a software vendor is a company that can actually handle peak registration capacity, not lowest price or length of vendor relationship? Or maybe its i nternal IT related, either way UNACCEPTABLE. Perhaps when their contract is up for renewal your IT team could actually investigate a software company that can scale to resident demand and not the incumbent vendor you've had for 10 years and which that is only one bidding. Sincerely, Rob Martin - 5209 W 48th St, Edina Rob Martin I Investment Banking 225 South Sixth Street, Suite 2050 Minneapolis, MN 55402 E: rob.martin@lakestreetcm.com www.lakestreetcapitalmarkets.coni 1 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #: The Recommended Bid is From: Susan Faus 1Z1 Within Budget Assistant Parks & Recreation Director ID Not Within Budget Date: February 17, 2015 Subject: Request for Purchase — MaxGalaxy Recreation Software Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: December 29, 2014 NA Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Maximum Solutions Inc. $34490.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: MaxGalaxy General Information: Maximum Solutions is a leading software provider for the recreation industry. The company is based in Edina but serves customers across the country. The Parks & Recreation Department including Braemar Arena, Edinborough Park, Aquatic Center, and Art Center has been using MaxEnterprise services and applications for over 10 years. The services provided are point of sale (POS), facility scheduling, program registration, membership management and league scheduling. MaxGalaxy is the newest release from MaxSolutions and would replace MaxEnterprise. Benefits of MaxGalaxy: • MaxGalaxy is a Web Hosted Cloud Based Solution, Staff will be able to access the software from any location an internet connection is available. • Shared Database, Currently, each facility has a separate database that is not integrated, • Improved Applications • Unlimited Technical Support • Frequent Data Backups • Unlimited Bandwidth Usage • Level 1 Security and PCI Compliance The price proposal includes costs for set up and configuration, training, individual facility cost broken dovvn per month and one new installation (Centennial Lakes), City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER This is a sole source bid. Attachments: MaxGalaxy Informational Brochure Price Proposal Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 7777.0307 I Cor,e`4,,.7e, • fn Won. 14,.. 74, 17771,701.1 07,1,.17 Galant'. ao“ x < • a 11 11 11 le 1, na 1? la 77 2.1 .11 17 77, 17 1r 1$ 7, 31F71 • reel 00.17,t 0.77707 0701,1117 , 0,7 VI it II ;11 1 110-..70,17 :0,1 • .A , 7407701 What's New in MaxGalaxy (For MaxEnterprise Users) With the release of MaxGalaxy, it brings a whole new game to the way you schedule and manage your daily activities for your company or organization. Building off the great success with MaxEnterprise, MaxGalaxy gives a new platform and that gives us the ability to enhance the software which was possible on MaxEnterprise's older platform. Below you will find a summary of many of the notable "customer requested" improvements to date in MaxGalaxy versus MaxEnterprise, broken down by category. Many more are being added each day. MaxGalaxy Facility Scheduling The first most noticeable difference MaxEnterprise (ME) users will see is the whole new scheduling screen. This scheduling screen was built so that customers could access and see their schedules (as well as make reservations) on a day, week, month and timeline views. The new screen also allows users to drag and drop reservations which wasn't previously possible in the ME scheduling grid, as well as viewing all the event details by simply hovering over it. In addition some other notable features are: Some key new features are: • New availability schedule feature replaces/streamlines the Business Hours and Seasons features found in MaxEnterprise. it also provides more functionality (e.g., different hours on different days of the week, and during different seasons) that was previously allowed. • Rate Charts now offer new "day of" hourly rates, "day of" flat rates, enhanced rates according to residency, rates according to age, new conditional rates according to event attendance and even new conditional rates according to event duration. Safe to say a few more options than in MaxEnterprise. • Ability to "share" facilities. Now instead of having to always use sub facilities, MaxGalaxy allows you to share facilities if you which. • Facility layouts feature allows users to tie a Layout document to scheduled events (e.g. we need the room setup this way for this particular event), In addition users can also tie as many use permits (e.g. we need a facility, deposit and alcohol permit for this event). Ability to include setup and cleanup in event time, or just one or just the other, • Ability to set default # of locker rooms by event type as well as by account. • "Include maintenance in customer's purchased time" by facility (instead of globally). • Ability to include setup and cleanup in event time, or just one or just the other. • Ability to tie individual facilities to a separate A/R accounts if desired. • Specify default event and maintenance durations in hours and/or minutes (not just minutes as found in MaxEnterprise). • Two new "When Events Span Multiple Rates" options use highest rate, use lowest rate. • In Book Recurring Events a new "custom" hooking option (for different times on different days) has been added for more complex schedules. Now you can include locker room assignments while doing these bookings. • Mass Edit gives the new ability to "sort" results by any column on the screen, multi-edit attendance numbers, multi-edit use permits, as well as multi-edit facility layouts. MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC.. 1.855.686.3493 Toll F)'66 763.541.9116 LOCAL 14,1 • 6 Li ENSEMOMMENNEEMR IMMINEMOI Group leUson (202090) etvvro ; IRCR1,013 nes $.1‘4.4 1 Co.:, :no. Ort..33, ORR.] 30. • . 46,,011;:. 203030 fur; ottv n.vt ii;ve Prie .33..roc ig!v33n3 • (32.3,33)1 13,1113334•W 1334.3" SRI Oste SLAW. trap. .4 TR. lwv26” 13,31/311A 131,CO3,1 RAI. 51013 5,5.111 Level 2 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 1.855.6436.3493 Toll Free I 763.541,9116 Lacm. • 5 f 5, _ Activity Registration Improvements The activity registration software has probably been the most enhanced module to date in MaxGalaxy. From a simplified activity setup screen to more options that anyone probably will ever need, this new product is already turning heads to it's complete functionality to not only track registrations, but gives our users ways never seen before to limit or elevate participation amongst groups, communicate with custom email messages and document attachments as much, much more. See below for an overview list of the most notable changes. ; filce! Activity Name . . . . Adult!GratALesson ,titt Altar Cad;. 25200 I Add II Remove li Seve Cancel Adult Group Lessou (502090) Camel I Sq a'I Rees 1 ,Schedvld .9AmpvniveRvAs! I Online!!R9IRArollees sta ER/T.110.ot 11,3:p4,3/R303 -tan plo,! Enrolleest12 j ASP! R.Iquir 'Veva, FRO.; Rsquirid: NinfroRnt Age:116!!!.. _•.j diA0/1/2t113 t-taxinium Me; 190 I I as of 110/1/20/3 .1 Cr-Ads 1339,11,34.3nt INx RequRed; ci Grade. 1 s,,R• :1,34 5(10 0/. ,EndO4R ! Activity Seareb; •• • • ' • ate 5.ser3owl.RIte OR,3. anoc amilm tanprI,R,s: Srigg 3013 R3,3 Genfle,r14,,,,ipun,vnis Gender; lCA2!!Ed_____ itRiLes31031113,03433,3R1 11,Ribe,s!, Urnip: i5eni0; Hembesill.p runt e Evv.m Level I Required: D Requiredt Ag Car4fRRI I SRI Ott. EolOszyj -I3RnRWIR3; In .133:e Sarinpj tiTA. t • Some key new features are: o We now offer four customizable "categories" (e.g., type, season, category, sub-category) to better separate and manage different sessions or seasons. • You can now specify in-house registration dates vs. online registration dates. This allows you to cater to your customers who don't utilize the Internet for registration. Otherwise you can limit the number of online registrants for each Activity (e.g. If you have a class of 30, you can give 20 spots for online sign-up, and 10 for walk-in). • MaxGalaxy allows you to setup conditional registration dates as well for priority customers, residency and even membership status as well as the associated automatic fees for each. • Now you can apply automatic discounts/surcharges according to priority, residency, membership status, multi-person registration, and/or multi-activity registrations. • Ability to "require": age, grade, gender, prerequisites, skills, membership status for customizing which customers can sign-up for what activities. Now you can add a membership and/or multi-use pass to a registration. Meaning the membership or multi-use pass is automatically assigned to the individual in the membership application by simply signing up for a program. O Schedule activities in facilities (like MaxEnterprise) or just create a list of meeting dates/times which aren't booked out on the gird. • You have the ability to attach documents to activities (e.g. class overview, brochures) as well as attaching hyperlinks to activities (e.g. a webpage that might go over the activity in more detail). • Ability to offer "payment schedules" for both walk-in and/or online registrations. • New pass/fail feature which automatically updates "Skill Levels". • Email confirmation(s) automatically included in registration process. • Separate Sell Registration vs. Edit Registration screens. Swimming Class Non-Resider Residency Non-Resident $56,00 Beth Adult Kirouu Lesson (202090) .................. General 1 Requirements Fees 1 Schedule 1 Communications 1 Online Reg Enrollees 1 Staff 1 Condition Rule Amount Qty Availability Swimming Class Resident Feti Residency City Resident $45.00 1 Both GV.1.31 FRO.% Item Item Admiu F.Zd. Drop-In - Adult Referee Fee Condit.an Rae Residency • • City Residert. Multi-Act v:ty 2014 Winter Skating Crop Coupon Code Fee Search: I eel Condition: :fit Amiability:i.t.561,1_1__ Preffil Clays; threw; Code: Diseounnlyj DisceAtTypetpercentage , Fee Search: 1 Fee: •••••• • Conditiani ReOdency Rule; ;City ,Resident Amount: 145 Quantity: 11 Oitcauntoi5vitho,ee, Availability:Both Package: ----------...... 1 Add Remove 1 . .„„.. .„ j Reset Filter j Activity Name* Code Adult Group Lesson 1202090 Activity Search: it 4hI 1 Add 11 Remove Save cancell • Activity Expiration feature — "expire" activities by season, type, category or sub-category. You also have the ability to "un-expire" activities as well. o Improved Deferred Revenue tracking capabilities allows you to better track revenues when the event actually takes place. • Ability to setup email notifications to staff whenever registrations occur. You can also view which staff member sold a registration and which staff members updated a registration. • Ability now to utilize coupon codes (for ROTH internal and/or online registrations) MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS 1,855.686,3493 Toll F.ree 7.63.541,9116 LOCAL li t , MI/WA ,r9-.4,';‘1111-qr`r _MEW _111111111_ MAXIN11/56 SOLUTIONS INC. 1.865.6E16,3493 Toll free WWW,MAXSOLUTIONS.CONI League Scheduling Improvements Another application getting a major overhaul is the league scheduling application which now enables you to fully manage your leagues from beginning to end. Below is a few of the improvements over MaxEnterprise League Scheduling, League Search: 11 Add 11 Remove _Save_ _11 Cancel I Men's Tuesday Night A League (TUE-A) I Schedule . . I Filter _ League Name a Code a Men's Tuesday Nigh TUE-A General Requirements 1 Fee Schedule Communications Online Enrollees Staff online Display Dates Start Date Start Time End Date End Time View Only 10/2014j!!!,,,1 12100 AM I 110/1/2014 i,i. 12;00 AM ILi Allow Onl.ne Teeth Registration; y: Allow Online Player Registration: .;.+, Allow Online Free Agent Registration: Free Agent Term; 1Free Agent Pool - Wens A lawns Free Agents inn ........ . 10:1;11 Itegistratien Dates Start Date Start Time 6,,V201.4 12100 AN , Online Team ftegistratHL Data Condit:on !Rule End Date End Tote 0,30!2014 112;00 All Start Date Start Time End Date End Dri Condit I.Copy Reg .Dates from In Monte Start Date: End Rate:, rigs' Time; ! ..• •.. .• Add Time: Online League Gmun: ,tlen's Softball Limit tpr dd of online team reg.strants: Limit for I of onl,ne nee agent reg!strants: ......................... Onhne team enrollment count; :Tiide enrollment count Online free agent enrollment count: 1Show enrollment count Online Team Waiver; ]Reg Alerts - Registration Info ltj Online Player Waiver. !Online Waiver Reg -JEAJ Some key new features are: • Now allow customers to setup teams, then it provides them with a team code which they can give the players on their team to sign-up either in-house or online. New "Team Player" vs. "Free Agent" functionality. This allows you to separate out team registrations vs. player registrations vs. free agent registrations. o Create different custom fields, league descriptions, confirmation notes, receipt notes, waivers, documents, email confirmations Slid even payment schedules (payment schedules are also an option online). You can develop conditional registration dates according to priority (e.g. A returning team or player) and residency as well as the associated fees. Automatic discounts/surcharges according to priority, residency, multi-player and multi-league registrations. View when staff sells and updates any league registrations by date and time. • Ability to "require": age, grade, gender, prerequisites and membership status for registration. • Ability to attach documents and hyperlinks to leagues that a participant will receive upon sign-up. • Ability to automatically add a membership/multi-use pass (player pass) to a League Registration. Adult Hockey League (769456) • • ......................... . General Requirements Fees -Schedule Communications League Desolation: lemon 1 r• 1Remember Meeting your buddies outside for a game of pick-up hockey? Relive that experience by joining a Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board pond Hockey league! 1 . The Pond Hockey season is five weeks km, Played on lake Nokomis during lanuarY i and February, League play consists of four-on-four play with no goalies on a 150- by I •- Players. Free. Agents . . . . In Hou,seTearn Wilier: In House Waiver Team Custom Field Greup: tio.ckey Registration Team Confirmation Rotes; ' This confirms your team has been registered for tire Adult summer ttacke'y Lea' gee. i — Team .Receipt Notes: . Please hoe all team fee's void boor p theJune lot start date, ,s.,y teams wall i °distending balanaces 10 1 ferefitthere games urtil entire balansr, :, paid ,,,, ful:, .— .--"----- ''''' ' '----7-- (5' 31 il Name A Document/Link .. Reg Type .. - ......... Activity Waiver • GefaxyL,Brochure.pdf : Tea in MaxSolutions I wwwznaxsolutions.com Team . Document Name Reg Type lArtMtY Waives • i„Zi iTeam. * 1 I Add jI. Remove .1 League Name • Cede • „. Adult - Hockey Long i 789456 1. Schedule Online i Enrollees Welt n.I•rS-L,. MAXIMUM SOLUTION.S INC. 1.855.686.3403 Toll Free I EMIL MIMI L Mt Max 1 • Email notifications to staff whenever team, player or free agent registrations occur. • Registration dates and waivers can be different versus walk-in and online registrations. • Team Waitlist feature (in addition to Player Waitlist). • Ability to invoice League Events. • Improved Deferred Revenue tracking capabilities. • New League Standings Configuration options including streaks, lasts games, last 10 Games, division record (vs Overall record), # of games back and/or win percentage. • Ability to group League Standings "By Division". • League Schedule screen shows conflicts by Team. Drop-In Adult Drop In Youth Skate Rental Total;• $33.211 Payments; L $0.00.1 Balante; $33.21 I Pulchasest invo can Gift Cards Tabs Purchases/ Invoices Reprint last Receipt POS/inventory Improvements Account Search; General Item Account flame: 'General , I French Fries $3.50 Pepsi 1 $2.78 i $2.78 Drop-1n - Mull $8,35 $18.66 Drop-In - Youth $6.07 $6.07 Retail General Transaction 4 1n30000 Schedule Event Subtotal: Taxi 31.04 I $2.171 Suspend Payments Foy,it ti 11 QtY Unit Price Ext Price Description Some Icey new features are: • New cash register layout Category and subcategory "tabs". In addition you now have the ability to include images for your PUS buttons, making it more clear for staff what item they are selecting. • Pay from a specific account or from a completely different account. • split payment methods with ease. • New tax included feature takes the guesswork out of adjusting the pricing of items so that the tax comes out correct. Now you simply put in the dollar value of the item, click tax included and the software figures out the tax for you. • Exact change feature to eliminate having to enter in the amount the customer gives you. • Item attributes feature (e.g., sizes, colors, brands, etc.). • New item choices feature (e.g., add cheese, pickle, mustard, ketchup, etc.). • Unlimited levels of Item categories/subcategories to better breakout sales. • Reprint last payment receipt/reprint last payment group receipt/reprint last CC receipt — all combined into one "Reprint Last Receipt" button, . • Print receipt/print CC receipt has been combined into one "Print Receipt" button. • Ability to designate which cashiers can begin/end shifts. • Unlimited text lines in PUS Receipt Headers and Footers. • Shift Management has improved ability to edit shift totals and shift payment methods. It also allows you to manually add additional payment methods to shifts, as we as keeping manager and cashier totals separate when on the same machine. MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS MC. 1,855.6-86,3493 Toll Free I 763341.9116 LOCAL WW AXSOLU ,0N5.0004 Package Name " I 20.Punchpass............. Package names 120 Punch Pass Package Typal 1Adolf CataearY: ;Punch Pass Tan Loceb'ont b Complex Limitabonr - Aift Account: 1 "! Pa shag; Ontail$ Expiration Type: IOW Duration/Interval; I _-- Expirab.on Dated Check In Constraints; Event Tractions ilteg.tfiLe!i_....... Event Type(s); (.Z‘.1Mtla II,,nbeeya picttrat7t0r. .14 Aatartrze, Li.Surdl Ord, . MI Liii ii End Date, Expired,1J Package Search: 1 I Add g Remove. iL_Savo 20 Ptmcit..i,ass Communications j Online Sales thnimum Cycle,: Default Payment Method: I - Prorate let Recurring :fees: Oetcm0 flay anue (-Menai hecolmilito) (..i) Distribute all deferred revenue on the activation date of Co mernberl Distribute deferred reVenue evenly based on the package durationfiril Hausa Sales Ditec Etatus: Activatcl: FAM,9: Start Date Start Time 1 End Date End Time .1 r-••••-•.' nee...ring Payment Defaults Duration/Intervals MP Max _ Membership/Multi-Use Pass Improvements One of the biggest changes MaxEnterprise customers will see is that we now combined MaxEnterprise's Multi-Use Pass and Membership into a single application, which also means a single check-in screen. This greatly reduces staff time and confusion of which screen to enable someone to check into with, We have also add some great new features to speed up the process of selling, assigning and renewing memberships as well. StnA limb • (MT,. Ctit517,55 017 In evl 010110 le1550 .ffln 0t5 • 75070,1 MO *;C4I4 1.0905 01001 b;flU 5:70 rtt Oj.LFn04anc Mtn., I i 7051, elan tasx.S; y;eào etnen IafloaC,n ,th4e.e1.4 (S. >46141 1.0 tv_sme Mjet.1.11: (COI <,n41.,10 npnt, 1," latt 11.1:At Tot., 0 7ttats Q . . odedan 11:4 adorn 0,60,4.ert. „ . Some key new features are 8 Ability to view which Staff Member sold or updated a membership and the date/time it happened. • Separate Sell Membership and Edit Membership screens • New copy from existing feature for minimizing the time to create similar membership types. • New Renewal feature greatly speeds up the process of people who want to simply continue their current membership. • A more streamlined process for selling multiple memberships than was found in MaxEnterprise. • Ability to designate Coupon Codes (Membership Fees can be automatically applied based on according to priority, residency and/or new/renewal status, • Automatic Discounts/Surcharges can be applied based on according to priority, residency and/or membership status. • Ability to "require" Age, Grade, Gender, and/or specific Prerequisites in order to purchase a membership. • Package Setup— ability to "add-on" memberships/multi-use passes to a membership sale • You can attach unlimited documents to membership packages to provide more information on the membership, rules, etc. of the pass. • Sell Membership—ability to prorate recurring membership fees • Email confirmation(s) are automatically included in membership sales process 71 Ability to designate coupon codes (membership fees can be automatically applied based on according to priority, residency and/or new/renewal status. • Improved deferred revenue tracking capabilities • Removed the periodic maintenance screen -- all functions are automatic now • New complex limitation feature .MAXI.MUM SOLUTIONS 1.BSS.6,86.31193 Toll •Free I WW. MA XS 16 LOCAL Customer Improvements Carpentier Family (100) General Info Account Info Scheduling Info I Barcode(s) Custom: Fields I Notes Priority History ; General info Account Name: LCarpentier. Family Account Number: [100 Account Type: !Penally -1;021 " Account Balance: $s,27.49 Credit Balance: Address Address Info MI Address 1 3240 Garfield Ave South Address 2: City: iilinhemaelis State: it4irinesata • Zip Code; 155400 Country: (United States ........ Residency: ICity Resident Purchase History I [ Payment Accounts I PeyrrienLSchedules1 I Registrations j I Memberships [ Leagues Contact into Phone: Add Remove Email: Add Account Contacts I Matt Carpentier - Father (Primary) (Billing) {Nikko Carpentier - Son Patti Carpentier Create New I Select Existing Remove I I Primary Contact j I Billing Contact I Name; Matt Carpentier Relationship/Position: 'Father In MaxGalaxy we are moving away from the Company/Family setup that was in MaxEnterprise. Instead now there are just Accounts which can be either, Individuals can be tied to as many accounts as you wish and all of their financials for each are kept separately. In addition we are adding a whole new grouping of functionality to better streamline account and individual maintenance. Add Remove (I Save .1[. Some key new features are • Ability to access account information (purchase history, payment accounts, registrations, memberships, etc.) on the initial customer or account screen for quicker access, • New custom fields feature with the ability to have infinite multiple custom fields by the individual and/or account levels to allow you to track as much information as you want on your customers, • Ability to have multiple phone numbers of the same type (e.g., two cell, two work, etc.) as well as to have multiple Email Addresses (e.g., Home, Work and Other) • New individual attributes feature (replaces positions/titles in the Individual types features • New priority feature (for online facility, registration and membership sales) which provides the ability to specific customers a closer customer service experience. (e.g. Residents or members can sign up 24 hours before,non-residents or non-members). • Ability to tie multiple Barcodes to a single Individual o Use separate barcodes to distinguish between membership vs, multi-Use Pass vs. gft Card, etc. o Or use the same barcode for multiple purposes • Ability to designate Residency (by Individual). Residency is a customizable field with the ability to even build in address segments to determine it in addition to city, state and zip codes. • Ability to have multiple Skill Levels (e.g., Skating Lesson level and Swim Lesson level) • Ability to be tied to multiple Accounts. o Children of divorced families can be tied to both parents making split payments much easier. • Ability to designate "relationship/position" for each account contact, New "Opt Out" features for mailings and/or emails. MAXI:MUNI SOLUTIONS INC. 1,8.55.6.86.3493 Toll Free I WWW,MAXS,OLUTI'ONS.COM Account Search: I Search cInilOS n Adult Programs n Adult Sports it Youth Programs it Special E,,nnts CoputO1A OtIte Co Wilmot • Duo DIU MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC, 1,855.6.86.34,93 Ton free j 763.541,9116 LOCAL I/ 1 . 1 3 A Ce‘ Customer Interface Site improvements The MaxGalaxy customer interface has also gone through a pretty through make-over, Now with even further customizabile CSS interfaces, we have also redesigned many of the screens for a more simpler customer interaction and visual experience. Things such as combining same sessions under group categories, using simple color coding for class availability (green means a person can register, yellow means w-aitlist, red means closed or full). The biggest thing we are excited about is the new customer management portion, where customers can view past registration history, update their accounts, even pay for any outstanding balanaces they have with you giving our clients more freedom by allowing their customers to do more, MaxGalaxy Online Demonstration Site Max Website Downloads Contact Us MaxGalaxy Client Portal Demo In Account! Login Howe Peon ROgN.Iregion Fuodbty1005evo05I0 MLitt Swimming OWn.t. 'IX,-t 100011; IS.) it 15 11040100 fain to 0p10+ Inn 00)nts 0 ,nlwwiugtThts duo, 35 0M0 00011:0 val inn sv,Irnanq, anaie 5 1, f,e1 turntannnle and confidnot in ihessatei 'Aiiitti 0011001 lite-19110 0110 Activity iterne Code gales Times • -gays location • ..... seus cross Lessen • 271512 i 0402014 . 12/31/2014 '030 An . 315 1.13 '70511 ,CootralCt jAMt1 Group 1.03 011 202070 .1011014 . 12ato14 , 11:20 40 .1015 314 ,11A7ri .11.04,1 CC 1400570000 1113000 200050 10112014 .12,31/2014 '1130 313 . 1231 Par 101.711 'Control CC , 4inats -04212014 -3:30 All- 10:31 Ail Tu,111 : Central CC Fitness swimming 51111111 in The aquae.' pregian tica 11101100111100,0, 050770 El c!a:s/e.lie,;1 Sid CO(3,113 ,313. IOgiter ,M.1.11(.331E,M. .... Acyviry Mime. AO:I/Ica Filt31 01 the Foot Aguako Wel, it the Pool Aquatici Ftnits in Um root VAtm1Voter fttess !Ptilellint Dole DeStlipI1011 Amount Paid 113 315111 0,Io.0P2, MN cm11 50210 51705 OW 10.152010 /0051,04' WIWS 51, 70 OM 1.10,011 041 3 7,,r 0 17474 0000 000 75 It 11,,, t "klataiw, (Am, Wk. el 13150 lull nose art 373110 14 00 0001 07 net I-Z:41014 i: P t 15 Fl0 370170 0500 0101 00 „MM. 10,0100 numbil 100olounO PA Id 0300003 5100017 10 2053110 7570 570333 • Ability to for customers to make payments toward account on anything outstanding they owe (purchases, invoices, memberships, statements). • Ability to use HTML "tags" in the notes/waivers feature for online sign-ups. • Ability for customers to view account history. • New rotator groups functionality for home page to highlight programs, bookings, league sign-ups and more. • New information pop-up window with additional facility and activity and details to create less clutter, MAXI KUM -501UTlONS 1,85.5.686.3453 Toll Free I WWW,MAKSOLUTIONS.COM Online Facility Reservation I Errint Date: (7/31/2014 Through Dale: i (7/31/0004 ............ ; Time Detween: rik., ALI (10 ok: P M ........ . Days: 1 11 Til V4 Ill F 53 Su !;;?;.: :n4 FaqtlyTge: ; All items checked Domeier,: ; All items checked Facility: none checked_ .... . ......... Amenities: I -1Gamaing4lear Showers NHL Size Seals EOD You must lie logged in to reserve/request a Meilltyt Create AocouM I Login Thursday, July 31, 2014 Sled Time End Time Duration Comple$ Facility Rate Type Rate PIS 4:00 PM 60 Ice Centre Wok Hourly 10.00 IOC PM 4:00 P14 •Ro lee Centre :Rink-Green Ilcurty :UM 4:00 PD 5:00 PM CO lee Centra .Rink- (OM T. Hourly 00.00 4:00 PIA 5:00 PM E0 kce Centre :Rink-Green 11051y :10.00 4:00 PM 0:00 PM EC Ice Centre :Rork- Red Hourly 50.80 5:00 P:00 PM CO Ice Centre :Rink- Blue hourly :40.00 5:00 PIir' 000 PM CO Ice Centre Mot- Green . Hourly 'MOO 500 PM 0:00 PM 00 Ice Centre /Mk- Rea „ nowt/ .5E00 CZ Pik ROO P14 7:00 PM 7:00 FIX 00 00 kro Centre Centro Rink- Blue Rink -Greed hourly o d,, 00 0 00 4 00 0:00 PM 7:00 PM 60 lice Centre Rink,. Red . Hour/ .50,00 7:00 PD 0;00 PM CO ice Centre 6kie _ROI:. i. Heady 30,00 7:00 PInt 6:00 PI/ so ICC Centre Rob - Green Hourly l$0.00 7:00 Pik 0;00 PM 60 Ice Centre Rink-Red Hourly .10.00 Search This application got a major overhaul versus its MaxEnterprise counterpart. We simplified the process of your customers going online and reserving facilities online. In addition we now offers whole new group of features to allow our users to tailor what they want to offer for online bookings and how they want to do it. Some key new features are: • Ability to offer a variety of "overlapping" available time blocks (e.g., hourly and half day and half day blocks). • Ability to offer optional other charges (designated by Facility). • Ability to specify "day of" rates (hourly or flat). • Ability to specify a default online event type (but also allows selection of others). • Ability to use HTML tags in online waiver feature for a custom look. • Ability to include setup and/or cleanup maintenance time in event time, • Ability to specify conditional online reservation dates according to priority, residency or membership group. • Online search functionality allows any combination of facility type, complex, facility and/or amenities. • Online reservation displays "reserve" or "request" or "call" (if no rate chart exists internally) by facility. • Online reservation displays unlimited search results based on the criteria the user enters. Soto cted Conn.-dos I Account Starch; t I Account flame: Contact: I Other Charge: Campground Campsite Campground-till Campsite 61 7122/2014 Check-In . Check- 7/2E/A 0 )0 Amp EtconiciWaterflahk-up Mgr Moo:0411er I-looiroyr ',moor OVA ntit Site ea Playground - El Warm Showorritortroorn EryikOrg Campsite Booking Improvements Campground; liarnpground-teauGalaxy _ Check-In Date: 17122/2014 Check-Out Date: 17/20/2014 , . . Amenities: t Search ; - Available - Unavailable (Event Conflict) Unavailable (Attribute Conflict) ;0 - Checked In In MaxGalaxy's online booking software we made the process much simpler for customer to quickly find a site, add any items they might need (e.g. electric hook-up, firewood, etc.) and whether that site is available. We now also allow internal users to be able to do the same type of booking without having to use the customer interface. You design and designate map coordinates of your campsite locations based on the map you upload, a visual map on screen shows if sites are available (users/staff can search by amenities as well if they are booking online or in-house. A few other cool new features: Some key new features are: • Full integration with our Point of Sale and Inventory Module. • New campsite "check-in" and "check-out" feature for tracking guests. * "Hover" capability over campground map (both internally and online). Internal Hover displays complete reservation details (for unavailable sites) or amenity information (for available sites). Online Hover displays amenity information (for available sites). MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC, 1,855,686,3493 Toll Free I 763,5 WWW.MAXSOLUTIONS.COM Adult Group Lesson (2019321 Dares: 10,12014- 1142112111-4 0080111100: (1401 re'rr 4,0 71E1 sr too rote to 2'2'c :,..1 10 n, tz1' /... P,,,g, 77- .7: 0,506 our; corn'orrettie a nd enotnern in In %,.. V, 3l; 1:y7-4 ''.,;:• r, 14.:9:".:E.2:: S+ 1 :i Online Registration Oates: 11 late 1-I 22 tl0 sit .• 1121014 12 Oil at1 11712014 1200 Att • 11M:2014 12 00 er t 244 :c.:140 "1:: Currently Enrolled: 14 Limit forgot Online RoOlOttonts1 10 Rogoirernonts: ; Min Age: lb :is 130 of 1145201.11 i flax/4m PO 1r0 ies et 10-020/14 ; Gender: cmCif PrereqUIsites: 140112 1.0.11 1 , Stalk Additional information: Rr r ,e Schedule: ogront 1102 CafpOnber,I.1111,. Day 6,'10910 1,24914 Start Time vEn1d1 AT7e CenitliCC d'o°0411 Facility ntpfiYo is 8.41.121105 .1;,0: CeAtralt1ftol c<dtr01CC ftel ,„ ' '2,2112o, .'1 0%4:22 :lug 'IttgaizIloc'1141 1.4 40 1145-Cl! Ste Mt 9.12,A1.1 -OAS 01:1 $, 91: 005 444 111 '111 9.1: 01 0.15 tel Centiotte pall COI:MCC Pool Ceill,alCC nal I lilV24-14 .,,t04,1400 :A.:1,! .$1 3.1.11 Al Contraree Pea? l. 11;1 /2'1 05441144 :el: i li AAI4i COI/MCC Furl cC :I :1 Cc : Foci o Cantruite Pool I 1 trt?,.11114 SZ•li° Al Centra:CCPtc? 111029091i 09 1,: AZ, tonitnlf.e.14,41 1 l 1141; :2210 11,4 241 .701 040 Ail 05.40 44f; esafrat CC Poo as 1 AM CentraICC pool testrarst soot 112/2/2014 $1.0.40 0°1' 4%1 .... 1i •i ; 11 i 2, . e . 0 9 1 11: 11.:1 Cala C C C C -Pro a I2i41014 30411 41 ,. CeateC Poe ol t 12i1 14 :200 0, :5 $4114 OentrorCCFool 21 /3014 0,00 A M 4:108 Cetra 0108, 914 ControlCCkm 71220;+ 500414 0 18. 1001,011Cn20 12.212014 :010 Al 081, C001,31CC P01 z13113214 .0Au 441 Cetral CC;lel :R3q 0.:1 Central CC. Peal 1 ao9iltration Information t.te Ate. melee Mg.,* Tee enceteee: 11lee Minle ene:e 11,1e MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 1.855,68.6,3493 Toll Free I INWW.NIAXSOLUTIONS.CONI -immErtiare liame or Registrant: '(i1jcar,: Should we contact you lo old In helping with your : disability?: Are there any medical ondillons that we should be aware Of?: Please select Porn the following:: Would you like 10 DO en our Weekly eerion fie t7: i2MIL I HEREBY i.ELEaSE 11110 14010 HARMLESS Wrifi RESPECT TO etlYitlIDA1.1..11..A.4,Y, 010) tlamay person or properti, WHETHER CAUSED BY IEGUGEIICE OR OTHERWISE, the following named persons or entities, herein temente as Carpentier Molt Caroni:sr Online Program and League (NEW) Registration Improvements Adel, .5,v145ell,a 11.4:41; 144 1414111 Air ••• •• • • • 1/101,15/IIIpe a•:•.: Lige, !kW Ceente3111 !Oeiet 2441.: left, fitness 5,1minIng 01 curt (1`..4 - 11n,"kotItien :372.11 S:GA, e 14 ,411 [1,431CC tenor, totifro rfof Se•Ottrn V271) WO 70114, Cee../ii LC 1,3,24 1.911 1.14,12,41. .1, e. 4 .11 Ceen. t1; ....... r•• 6. Ce tnorets9. seald1,14s, Advlt Pro3ral, A4.40,1% YouTh Zp:tal Lttls AMO N.. Vrax• 4,311, 111,PM le4,14Mf 1,1,111114 E.! ettsft:1 iro,:walp !Int, COOt Dalla to4e1e..1:4:4174 :Ann 1Crin:014-li4Wst4 Ainre li.K014-int,131+ :e10/1 111c0:4. IALICA* limes eanN nem •rcarst -atom MaxGalaxy Online Registration has been retooled for a much simpler and easy process than it was for customer to sign-up in MaxEnterprise. From a completely re-designed customer interface as well as group activities to "Online Activity Groups" in order to streamline Cl Site display. You can even order online activity groups in any manner you choose. The new customer interface also allows customers to view past registration and/or purchase history and even allows them to pay any outstanding transactioh they might have from a walk-in purchase or invoice. e414, Oat, 11:41.1 1 Please select a league reelsuallon option. Register a Team -4015 a Tearn RegIstor individual ) a taaq • 1,1 7014 566 f.16 nri Ope.•15.1c 11 • 01<-151,-w 1 Rink Schedules 4.•RIA5-81110 .1.:0Inn• Grain •?•Rin,:-Rta n•• 'n • •• • •••••• •• •• nn n n ••• • n nn 2,7,9.0pailf•117,7fIrlIf7i a ;1, ,. -5 Clnn Skate • ..• Da, aa:ta Fri aNy Web Reporting Improvements * Direct link provided from setup screen to each web report displayed online (for previewing) • League Schedule report provides direct links to Team Schedules • League Schedule report is completely customizable (show/hide 12 different columns of information) Thursday, Auuust 07, 2014 : iStartilme Complex Facility Visitor • PM Home Pts Event Type • 000 PM be Complex Ft : . • !Loli=.7: . 6.00PM 00 Comphax ;F2 Ti.:a0 'del ..: 1::-.07.1 , . : . iMla r• L'ar0 Game. Clat0e i 1600 PM 88 CorteBsx TS 21.: : : 111,0 Li;,,,,PrA ';-:-;..11.1,.,-;,,, IGG:mmee 1 17030 FM '613-Conlis.x. Ti 125:1.1 0. . : . • . 17:00 PM 013 canoix in i.i.,,,,, i.:::1.,•,, T1Li': Pan .• . . . .. . .• •t.P11;: V;,:i:- :Clams ] 1P,00 PM .1111Coule!ex T2 1 '[8:08 PM ..813 Comptex- .y1 . . ' < 3 0Doors nn , e i ism Pm .oa compac:, in . 5: s..., ,.: 7 : : .!".5i.'.1n:'':it'.';': 1 ;GOD PM • B8 Comp'. +1 '::::.., .:::::1 : . • . y3 50 y: ;Gam 1 19,00 PM .68 Cooptex Pt 1H061.1-01i”3 : ;•:::,:r.an Bet:. -dame 1 /9.00 PM BB Complex :F2 Igta101,0•0• 'Ill:: li.....21, :1,, 1:(30rm: 1 10.00 FM :Bs Comtg.ex IF3 i.5.:60ia101-a; Visitor Me Home Pts Event Typo Game Men's Monday B i Volfl fl:offe,:fiffrff fiber: I Ameiican iTealli W L T OTL SOL bp Pis Pct 1.5 1.10 STRK RF bA Olv GO 1142 Efai.iiS 3 , 1 2 0 , 1 6 F 8 f 0.601:2.1.0 34-0 WI 27 18 1430 • I Pizza f 0320 0 5 2 1 0200 0-10 0-3-0 Ti 9 22 04.0 2.5 gem. 0 0 0 . 0 0 , 0 0 9.000 0-941 0.0-0 - 0 o 0.04 I :000P15 BB comic,: P2 1.1,p; :015 000, ; 8.000 0-0-o 0.0.4 • - 0 6.„).19„9.....1., I NfItiffilal I fafirli- w E T OIL SOL GP Pts Pct L5 Litt STITH RF RA . OW GO '. tVii co:: it:,, f 3 2 0 0 0 5 : 6 ! 0.602 3-2-0 3.2to , Li 20 . 20 I-241 - - ' IZichm(13.11,,1 3 1 2 0 9 000.607 24-0 34.0 ,. - LI - 18 : 17 3-0-11 -0.5 '. IA bcincis TB ,•.: 2 • 3 0 1 1 6 : 5 i 0 110 . 2-3.0 2-3-1 : WI . 19 . 22 1.24 1 ' pv511911, 000 0 0 i a : 0.0ao a4o 0.0.0 ; - : o , o- :. 0-o-0 8.5. MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC, 11,5_ifff 1,855,686,3493 Toll Free I 763,541,9 WWW,MAXSOLUTIONS.CONI Thursday, August 14, 2014 !Start Time Complex Facility 16:00 PM BS Complex Ft ;600PM . a Cowie), f2 83110 PM 88 Complex ,F3 790 PM BB Comp!ox PI 7:00 PM 60 0000007 • F2 17:00 PM .6000me0 93 inn PM :BB Con1Yek .F1 16:00 PM .60 agnpeax :92 10:00P9.l bti OcreetcX F3 Aao PM :88 Compel :F1 CoNttneaConOr Maximum Solutions 2:00 PM • 3:00 PM „ colvienu,0vout Maximum Solutions tvent a:00131a4:00PM my115141 511 111111 NBA NHL RCM& NCMM HASCAB SOCCER 1E51115 ihORt. ST J 1: ... .. VM1CII Supped Our Local Sponsors MAXIMUM SOLU.TIONS INC. 1.855,486.31193 Toll Free I 76 WWW.NIAXS'OLUTIONS.COM axy Digital Signage Improvements (formerly M Wide° Link in MaxEnterprisej • Ability to play sound, music, etc. • Ability to display flash objects (,swf files) • Unlimited number of Panels on each template • No restrictions on shapes and sizes of panels on each template • Slideshow capability • Different animation types for slideshows • Ability to manually "drag/scroll through" items displayed onscreen (for touchscreen monitors) • Ability to completely customize the schedule display appearance (using CSS) • HTML text editor — to display rich text without haying to use HTML tags • •• .- Maxornu • 3ant-1611.4;1m. MaxGalaxy Price Proposal Name: City of Edina Customer: Susan Faus / Nick Lovejoy Date: 12/29/2014 Parks and Recreation Phone: 952-826-0367 Valid Thru: 3/29/2015 Location: Edina, MN Email: Ittails@edinamn,gov/ aloveloy@ci,edina„ 11C,,115 Special Notes or Comments: MaxGalaxy cloud based software Is a monthly subscription service. Unless Specified, Maximum Solutions requires new customers to sign and pay 12 months of hosting fees upfront. Initial Setup and Configuration Costs Price Setup and Configuration of MaxGalaxy Core System for up to 8 locations. One new Install. $8,350.00 Current Client Discount (Customer is licensed for half the modules now) ($3,750,00) Total Initial Setup and Configuration Costs $4,600.00 Application Module(s) and Monthly Costs Monthly costs Include software, data storage, bandwidth usage, redundant back;ups, periodic software updates, unlimited techrlica I support. Monthly costs are prepaid on a 12 month basis unleSsptherwlse noted Concurrent Users Needed Monthly Costs Hotted Core ApplicationsInclude; Facility Scheduling 35-40 $400.00 Program Registration 25.30 $325.00 Point of Sale & Inventory 20-25 $300.00 Membership Management 15-20 $205.00 League Scheduling Additional Applications Include: camment.c and Notes; 5-10 $150,00 General Ledger Exporting , $70.00 Welisife CaleiftISTIntegratirin Digital Display $50.00 Credit Card Processing Requires a payment gateway, see additional items below $0.00 Customer Web Portal: Online Account Management/Payments $0.00 Online Facility Bookings -- $70.00 Online Program Registration _ $70.00 Online League Registration $60.00 Online Membership Management $60.00 Total Monthly Costs $1,820.00 Confidential Pricing Document from Maximum Solutions Inc. 12/29/2014 Page 1 •.. Maximum Solutions lne, MaxGalaxy Price Proposal Customer: Susan Faus / Nick Lovejoy Phone: 952-826-0367 sfaus@edinammgov niovejoV@ctedina.mmus Special Notes or Comments: MaxGalaxy cloud based software is a monthly subscription service. Unless Specified, Maximum Solutions requires new customers to sign and pay 12 months of hosting fees upfront. Training Costs Training Costs Setup and Configuration of MaxGalaxy Core System for up to 7 locations. Expected onsite training costs: none 4 Local Client *If °mite, the client Is responsible for the travel costs (hotel, car, airfare, etc.) that apply. $8,250.00 Total Training Costs $8,250.00 Additional Items Qty Price Extended Price 2 For Credit Card Processing: PayPal, AuthorizeNet, etc. We recommend Element Payments credit Card Processing 1 Estimated Gateway-100% PCI Compliant $25/month 2 For Storing EFT Information:A PASS account for storing credit cards In a 100% PCI Compliant environment 1 Estimated $15/month " Above pricing Is with keeping your current credit card processor. If you do hosting services with Element Payments (Global Payments In Canada) they will waive these monthly costs. You can also take In-house credit raid payments as well lust simply add a PCI compliant swipe device: $99.00 + $10 s/h. 3 Required Computer Hardware: For inhouse credit card payments, a Magtek IPAD SC, Security encrypted by our gateway vendor of choice. Cost include encryption charge. Pin pad and has options in place for upcoming PIN debit move so hardware won't have to be repurchased in 2015. 1 Estimated $300/each TOD Total Additional Costs $0.00 Total: Investment S.Ummary.8i.Breakdown 1 Total Setup and Configuration Costs $4,600.00 Summary & Budgeting 3 Monthly Costs Per Year (12 Monthy Prepay) $21,840.00 Monthly Support and Hosting Cost $1,820.00 3 Total Training Costs $8,250.00 Yearly Prepay on Monthly Cost; $21,840.00 4 Total Additional Ch di - 0.00 Yearly Cost Total Investment Since Stort TotalSoftware, Services, Training , etc. $34,690.00 Year 2: $21,840.00 $56,530.00 Year 3: $21,840.00 73, 3 70.00 Year 4: $21,84000 . $100,2_10.00 Name: City of Edina Parks and Recreation Location: Edina, MN Date: 12/29/2014 Valid Tim 3/29/2015 Confidential Pricing Document from Maximum Solutions Inc. 12/29/2014 Page 2 Costs Broke Down by Location General Information Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Location 5 Location 6 Location 7 OVERALL TOTAL Location Name Braemar Arena Sports Dome Art Center Parks and Rec Edinborough Park Aquatic Center Centennial Park Upfront Costs $500.00 $750.00 $750.00 $500.00 $675.00 $675.00 $750.00 $4,600.00 Training Costs $650.00 $1,750.00 $1,650.00 $650.00 $900.00 $900.00 $1,750.00 $8,250.00 LOCATION BREAKDOWN TOTAL $1,150.00 $2,500.00 $2,400.00 $1,150.00 $1,575.00 $1,575.00 $2,500.00 MONTHLY COSTS Braemar Arena Sports Dome Art Cetnter Parks and Rec Edinborough Park Aquatic Center Centennial Park OVERALL TOTAL Facility Scheduling 65.00 60.00 40.00 65,00 60.00 60.00 50.00 $400.00 Program Registration 50.00 50.00 45.00 75.00 60.00 0.00 45.00 $325.00 Point of Sale EA Inventory 30.00 30,00 20.00 not needed 60.00 100.00 60.00 $300.00 Membership Management not needed not needed 55.00 not needed 75.00 75.00 not needed $205.00 League Scheduling 45.00 45.00 not needed 60,00 not needed not needed not needed $150.00 - e Employee Time Clock Availabl early 2015 not needed not needed not needed not needed not needed not needed not needed $0.00 Integrated Credit Card Processing no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge $0.00 General Ledger Exporting 10,00 10.00 10.00 10,00 10.00 10.00 10.00 $70.00 Digital Display 20.00 10.00 10.00 not needed 10.00 not needed not needed $50.00 Website Calendar Integration 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 not needed $60.00 League Standings, Scores, etc. no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge $0.00 Online Bookings and Requests 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 $70.00 Online Program Registrations 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 $70.00 Online League /Team Registrations 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 not needed not needed not needed $60.00 Online Membership Sales not needed not needed 20.00 not needed 20,00 20.00 not needed $60.00 LOCATION BREAKDOWN TOTAL $265.00 $250.00 $245.00 $255.00 $325.00 $295.00 $185.00 $1,820.00 12 Month Payment Total $3,180.00 $3,000.00 $2,9400 $3,060.00 $ ,300.00 $3,540.00 $2,220.00 $21,840.00 What each location should pay: Seasonal Adiustments 12 Month Payment Total $3,398.00 $1,534.00 $3,158.00 $3,278.00 $4,118.00 $3,756.00 $2,438.00 $21,572.00 A Confidential Document by Maximum Solutions Inc. Facility Breakdown Heather Branigin From: John Hamilton <johnh6125@gmail.com > Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 5:25 PM To: James Grube Cc: Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); James Hovland; rdcjmiller@comcast.net Miller; Chris Bremer; Chad Millner; Mark K. Nolan; Mosing, Steve P.; jon.wertjes@minneapolismn.gov Subject: Meeting Minutes from 03/01/16 Xerxes Ave Bump-outs Attachments: 030116 Meeting Minutes.doc Please accept the attached meeting minutes. Please add, revise, correct and respond. 1 March 7, 2016 Meeting Minutes from March 1, 2016 meeting at the Edina City Hall In Attendance: James Hoveland; Robert Steward; Mary Brindle; Chad Milner; Mark Nolan; Steve Mosing; Bob Miller; Mayor, City of Edina Edina City Council Edina City Council Director of Engineering, City of Edina Transportation Planner, City of Edina Traffic Operations Engineer, City of Minneapolis Resident of Strachauer Park Neighborhood Chris Bremer; Resident of Strachauer Park Neighborhood John Hamilton; Resident of Strachauer Park Neighborhood; Writer of the Minutes Meeting Convened by: James Grube; Hennepin County Highway Engineer The meeting was held in the Mayor's Conference Room at the Edina City Hall. The purpose of the meeting was to set a path to resolve the "livability" concerns along Xerxes Ave. South. Background: The Avenue received a mill and overlay and lane re striping two years ago. A major feature of that effort was to appropriately channel traffic; the street had historically been used as a four lane artery even though the paving width was too narrow to allow it. The re striping effort reduced traffic to one lane each direction, with parking on both sides of the street. In order to clearly delineate the parking lanes, concrete islands with plastic delineator posts were inserted in the parking lanes. The street is not wide enough for a marked bike lane in addition to the parking and driving lanes; however, recognizing the fact that bikers will use the roadway, the concrete islands were reduced in width to allow bikers to move closer to the curb wherever parked cars are not in the way. In the past several years, all of the streets that span the Crosstown Highway in the southwest quadrant, France Avenue, Penn, Lyndale Avenue and Xerxes, have been reduced from four lanes to two. The effect of this lane reduction has been to intensify the traffic on these four streets. The impact of this was mitigated on two of the other three streets by reconstruction and the inclusion of turn lanes, but because Xerxes is narrow and was not fully reconstructed, the 2014 project resulted in both an unattractive appearance and at times a continuous unbroken line of vehicles with bottle necks at the intersections and rather contentious behavior at rush hour. The appearance, traffic, and the resultant driver behavior has a deleterious effect on the residential nature of the Xerxes and presents a poor image of the neighborhood. The meeting was convened as the next step in determining an effective means of ameliorating these problems. Meeting Minutes: 1. Mr. Grube opened the meeting introducing the efforts the County has made to understand the issues. He provided handouts illustrating a) current conditions, b) limited boulevards proposed by the neighborhood, and c) a full street renovation with extensive boulevards including storm water inlet revisions. 2. Mr. Grube defended the efforts in 2014 describing the increased safety to pedestrians and bikers on the roadway. Everyone present agreed that the street is indeed much safer. 3. Mr. Grube explained the difficulty of renovating pedestrian walkway corners; if one corner of an intersection is to receive ADA compliant crossing, then all four should be made compliant, otherwise a person with limited abilities could find themselves trapped by non-compliant curbing, however only one corner of the four at the 60th and Xerxes intersection was made compliant in the 2014 project. 4. The neighborhood representatives clarified their intent, which is to make the street as much like Lyndale and Penn as possible while acknowledging the limited available budget. They understand that a complete street re-design is not possible at this time, no matter how much it might be enjoyed, but that limited curb and gutter work can significantly alter the appearance of the street for a very modest investment. 5. Edina has received a Federal Grant to install sidewalks along the length of Xerxes from 54th to 60th. This effort will provide ADA compliant crosswalks on the Edina side at all of the intersections affected. Although the drawings are in place and the bids received it does seem to be a perfect time to coordinate efforts to achieve the stated goals. 6. The discussion soon centered on discovering what might be done to achieve the goal of a street with a more residential nature. Some ideas presented included: a. Replace all of the plastic reflectors with steel bollards provided, installed, and maintained by the County. b. Identify the islands with attractive icons such as Target has done in their parking lots with the giant red concrete spheres. c. Introduce art and sculpture onto the islands perhaps in the form of customized and lighted bollards. 7. The boulevard concept was initially discussed as occupying the full parking lane; staff was clear that maintaining as much bicycle compatibility as possible was a mandate. They believed that in order to accomplish that goal, the 11' wide driving lane and a 4' bike lane was necessary even though the parking lane infringed on the bike lane where the concrete islands did not exist. The meeting concluded due to time constraints. The agreement at the close of the meeting was that Mr. Grube would evaluate the ideas offered and respond and provide a catalogue of lighted and specialty bollards to those present. Follow-up Exploration: It seemed after the meeting that staff was at least in part convinced that the landscaped boulevards could not work because it did not appear to them that adequate dimension existed across Xerxes to accommodate traffic, bikes, and boulevards. I checked the dimensions again and that assumption does not appear to be true to me. Back- of-curb to back-of-curb the street is 42 feet wide. In the current design, the county is pushing the bike path into the parking lane by 3'-6". The traffic requires 11'-0" per lane, the bike lane is 4'-0" wide leaving 6'-0" for the boulevard (including the curb)in the worst case. Through four blocks on the Minneapolis side, from 56th to 60th, there is already a four foot wide space between the curb and the sidewalk so a landscaped boulevard of ten feet in width (minus 6" for the curb) is available. From 60th to Crosstown on the Minneapolis side there is an 18" space between the sidewalk and the curb allowing a 7'-0" planting space. On the Edina side through the entire length, the planting bed is reduced to 5'-6" from the edge of the sidewalk to the back of the new curb; more would be better but that is enough to get the right tree variety to thrive. On the Minneapolis side now there are 25 year old ash trees in the four foot wide boulevard, a foot and a half narrower than any boulevards proposed. Editorial: The street cut, excavation, debris removal, new curb and gutter work, and appropriate backfill can be accomplished for $35 a lineal foot. The boulevards are not out of reach. A thousand feet of tree planted boulevards can be accomplished for $50,000 and it will go a very long way to transforming the street from gritty urban artery to an appropriate residential street that will provide an attractive introduction to the cities on each side. Sara Haugen Principal Administrative Specialist I ES Finance sara.hauoen@metc.state.mn.us P. 651,602,1016 390 North Robert Street I St. Paul, MN I 55101 I metrocouncil.oro CONNECT MTH US METRO! TAN a u N C I L Heather Branigin From: Haugen, Sara <Sara.Haugen@metc.state.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 9:04 AM Subject: Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Budget - Meeting for City Officials Good morning: Metro Cities and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) will host a meeting for city officials (elected and staff) on Friday, March le, from 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. to discuss MCES' fmancial structure, budget trends and capital needs. This forum came about as a result of concerns by city officials on recent trends in the regional wastewater charge, and potential cost controls looking out over the next 3-5 years. Metro Cities asked MCES to host a forum geared towards elected officials, city administrators/managers/clerks and finance directors. The meeting will be held in the first floor St Croix Room, LMC Building, 145 University Avenue, St Paul. The forum will include an overview of MCES and insights into the MCES budget process. Topics include MCES governance, finance, competitiveness, capital spending, and budget components. Special attention will be given to debt service and efforts to control MCES costs and the "why" behind MCES services and fees. There will also be a breakout session so MCES can hear from customers what can be done to more clearly explain MCES services and fees, learn about primary customer concerns, and solicit feedback on what MCES can do better. This forum is a supplement to the MCES customer forums in May/June, which provide an annual deep dive review into the following year's proposed budget. Please forward within your organization as appropriate. Please RSVP to: sara.haugen@metc.state.mn.us Thank you, 1 Heather Branigin From: Ron Way <ron-way@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 12:54 PM To: James Hovland Subject: FW: shorter golf courses From: Ron Way [mailto:ron-wayPcomcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 12:13 PM To: akattreh@EdinaMN.gov Cc: jabood@edinamn.gov; rick@cahillfa.com; hulbert0089@gmail.com; lhovland@krausehovland.com Subject: shorter golf courses Ann: I just completed a Star Tribune commentary on some of the issues facing the golf industry. In researching the piece, I talked with a number of golf operators and read several commentaries in national publications, including a column tweeted today by the Wall Street Journal's sports editor. The point is repeatedly made that golf needs to find a way to attract the young people and millennials who react to the expense of golf and the time to play a round. Of interest, to a person the suggestion is made to build shorter courses, say a six-hole loop. One even wondered why golf couldn't be a 12-hole game. I've always favored incorporating a 6-hole loop in the new Braemar plan, and by using two pin placements the course could be a 12-holer by playing it twice. In fact, one thought that I had (I know the process is late) is for Braemar to build three 6-hole courses. That way, folks may play 6, 12, or 18 holes. It would be innovative, and noticed in the community. Frankly, the sustainability of the game is a real concern given that so many young people are staying away. But also of interest to me, is that the Natl Golf Foundation has found that very large numbers of young people and millennials are trying the game, but a nearly equal number don't return. Thanks for your time. Ron Heather Branig in From: Edina Give and Go <invite@eventbrite.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 5:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Did you know? You are invited to the following event: EDINA GIVE AND GO ANNUAL FUNDRAISER Event to be held at the following time, date, and location: Friday, April 8, 2016 from 6:00 PM to 8:00 PM (CDT) The home of Meg and Tony Rodriguez 6624 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 View Map No Maybe Event registration is by invitation only. Register with your email address to attend this event. Did you know 740 Edina students qualify for free or reduced-price meals? Come learn how you can make a difference in the life of one of our students at our Annual Fundraiser, Please join us for a casual party, and have fun while fundraising to help Edina Give and Go advance its mission. With your help, Edina Give and Go will continute to bring life and learning opportunities to Edina Public Schools students who are economically disadvantaged. "1:14 If you are unable to attend, please GIVE and GO on our website: www.edinacilveancluo.orq We hope you can make it! Cheers, Edina Give and Go This invitation was sent to mailedinainn.gov by Edina Give and Go the organizer. To stop receiving invitations from this organizer, you can t.inttbscrihe. Eventbrite, Inc, 1 155 5th St, 7th Floor 1 San Francisco, CA 94103 2 Heather Branigin From: Madelaine Perry <madelainep21390@isd273.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 8:34 AM To: Edina Mail; Elijah Mickelson; Jennifer Harrits Subject: Texting and driving in Edina 7th grade apathy project. To whom it may concern. We have been working on apathy in our 7th grade L.A class, our focus has been on texting and driving in Edina. After doing extensive research on the problem of texting and driving we have come up with a affective solution and would love to share it with you. Please join us for our presentation in the Dragseth Auditorium at South View Middle School in Edina on March 17th at 7:45-8:10 in the morning. If you are unable to make it and would like to see our presentation we would be happy to send the links Thanks for your time! Sincerely, Madelaine P. Maddie W. Morgan B. Seventh grade Student South View Middle School. 1 The Honorable James B. Hovland, Mayor March 8, 2016 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed "Millennium at Southdale" Development Dear Mayor Hovland: The Edina City Council meeting of March 15th will discuss DLC Residential's proposed redevelopment of the northwest corner of Xerxes and 66th Street. I live at 6400 York Avenue South in the two-block residential neighborhood just north of this proposed development. As you are well aware, the Edina Planning Commission did not recommend this project, responding in part to the concerns expressed by nearby residents and to the Commission's own misgivings about the traffic study submitted by Kimley-Horn in support of the development. As they pointed out: 1. Since Kimley-Horn Associates is a subsidiary of DLC Residential there is a potential conflict of interest. 2. The study addressed only the impacts of this single project and failed to take into account the cumulative effect of numerous development projects occurring in the immediate vicinity. 3. Impact on the adjoining neighborhood was not sufficiently addressed. The first two points are relatively self-evident, so let me address the third. As our petition indicated, we who live nearby are concerned that traffic will increase significantly on York Avenue. The garage entrances for both Phase One and Phase Two of Millennium open onto York Avenue which would be extended south into the property. While Millennium residents may exit onto Xerxes, doing so they can only turn right and hence go south. It seems logical that the majority of them would want to go north to the Crosstown Highway, the major traffic artery. The obvious way to get there is to go north on York through our neighborhood, turn right onto 64th, and exit onto Xerxes to reach the Crosstown. (Please see the attached drawings.) Kimley-Horn's study estimated that only 30% of traffic from the development would exit via York and my first major point is that this assumption seems obviously flawed. As Commissioner Forrest pointed out during the Planning Commission hearing, unlike the patients currently coming to the medical buildings, residents of an area Edina City Council: Millennium at Southdale Proposal Page 2 quickly figure out efficient shortcuts, such as the one to the Crosstown. Further- more, the Kimley-Horn study says nothing about return flow, but the shortest route back for residents would also often be via York. My second point is that the exit from 64th onto Xerxes is already crowded and dangerous. It is necessary to make a left turn across four lanes of traffic, which is often difficult even with the median. There have been serious accidents at that intersection in recent months and a signaled crosswalk has just been installed to help pedestrians. Adding more automobile traffic at this intersection is a bad idea. My third point is that our York Avenue neighborhood is currently very pleasant. It is densely populated, with 317 condominium and apartment units clustered in just two blocks, but the buildings are set back from the street, well maintained, with nice landscaping and lighting. Importantly, there are no sidewalks, and so at all hours people can be seen out in the street: school children walking home from their bus stop, joggers, bikers, and people walking their dogs. Our concern is that, with the proposed plan, our pleasant residential street will become a major thoroughfare. By creating a new, pedestrian-friendly neighborhood to the south, the city risks destroying the already existing pedestrian-friendly neighborhood to the north. According to the Greater Southdale Area Planning Study, one of the key questions to be asked of any project is "What elements of the proposal support infrastructure needs of adjacent or nearby sites?" That question has been sidestepped. This project does not support our neighborhood's infrastructure needs—it degrades them by funneling the traffic of 375 units onto York Avenue. It also ignores the increased traffic flow from new projects going up all around Southdale. We call upon the City and the developer to deal with these potential problems in a more straightforward way. The first step is to protect our neighborhood, which you do by requiring DLC to relinquish its right-of-way onto York as a condition of approving their project. York Avenue actually ends at the north end of the medical property, but there is a driveway from it into the parking lots of the two buildings. DLC's deed includes an easement onto York Avenue and they plan to extend the street into their development. As one planning commissioner pointed out, however, this could be a negotiable issue. Since DLC's own studies argue that traffic flow onto York would be minimal (an idea we question), blocking that route should not affect the project's viability—at least in the initial years. Edina City Council: Millennium at Southdale Proposal Page 3 Second, you create a cul-de-sac at the south end of York, requiring Millennium residents to use other exits from the property. That cul-de-sac, in turn, forces the City to shoulder its responsibility. Developments such as Millennium increase population density and thereby increase tax revenues but, in return, the City needs to provide essential infrastructure. In this case, the required infrastructure is 65th Street. The Southdale Area draft plan for "Critical Traffic Infrastructure Improvements" proposes extending 65th Street from Barrie Road to Xerxes at some point and DLC has been required to leave an easement at the north end of their property for this. This extension is needed now, permitting convenient exits east onto Xerxes or west onto Barrie Road for Millennium residents. With five or six years before the construction of Phase Two, there is ample time to plan and make the extended 65th Street an integral part of the expansion. Finally, while most concerned with protecting our neighborhood, we also urge the Council to address the wider traffic issues from the many new developments occurring in the Greater Southdale Area. Steps must be taken to alleviate increased traffic density on York, Xerxes, and 66th, including possible stoplights on Xerxes at 64th or 65th, revised parking regulations, extended turn lanes, etc. It is fine to encourage "neighborhood-friendly" developments such as Millennium at Southdale, but such development should not take place at the expense of our existing friendly neighborhood. We call upon the Council 1) to require DLC to relinquish its easement onto York, 2) to create a cul-de-sac on York before Phase One construction begins, 3) to prioritize the extension of 65th Street, constructing it in advance of or in conjunction with Phase Two of the Millennium project, and 4) to address seriously the potential traffic problems from the plethora of new developments in the Greater Southdale Area. Yo truly, (.. i Peter F. Parshall 6400 York Ave. S., #402 Edina, MN 55435 m ET-1 FOLEJ 6450 6400 " York Ave. S. 6415 '4 S 11 4 99 M Xerxes Ave. S. Xerxes Ave. S. cs) *1 S 1 1 4S 9 M 6415 I 6455 I 'p d a p . le a oi 'I S 4 49 9 M 6450 6400 York Ave. S. Xerxes Ave. S. Xerxes Ave. S. IS q 41 7 9 M Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Katie Stockwell <kat.stockwell@gmail.com> Wednesday, March 09, 2016 10:03 AM Ann Kattreh; Edina Mail awesome job, GREAT staff (Parks 8t Rec) Follow up Flagged as you know registration was a little frustrating this week to say the least for summer programs. I called a several times and I finally spoke to two different people on the two times I got through. First time was Amanda. She was sweet and kind and patient while I explained the problems to her. For all the calls she was fielding on MON morning I was really shocked at how composed and patient she was while dealing with the same question (from me) for probably the 20th time that morning. She was very assuring and told me what to do to get my issues resolved. That was the first experience with your office. The second time I called I got Vera. Same thing. Patient, reassuring that we would get the classes we wanted (and we did as far as I can tell), and never seemed annoyed that I was asking probably something she had already answered 20 times. I know you guys are busy this week but I wanted to let you know that your awesome attitudes in dealing with frustrated parents is really making a difference. Instead of us getting some similarily frustrated office workers we we treated with respect and kindness (and patience!). THANK YOU! Keep up the good work!!!! All the best, K Katie A. Stockwell "Everything around us is made up of energy. To attract positive things in your life, start by giving off positive energy." Heather Branigin From: Audrey Nolen <audreyn21156@isd273.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 12:11 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Jennifer Harrits; Elijah Mickelson Subject: Invitation to cigarette disposal presentation To whom it may concern: We have been studying apathy in our 7th grade Language Arts class. We had to identify a problem in the Edina community, gather evidence of the problem and create a campaign to educate people about the issue. The problem we chose was cigarette litter on the ground that damages the environment. To collect evidence, we created a survey and went on a walk to collect cigarette litter. We found two sandwich bags full of cigarette litter on a one and a half mile walk. We have come up with a solution and a campaign that we would like to share with you. Please join us on Friday March 17th at South View Middle School in Edina. Our five minute presentation will be between 10:45 and 11:00 in the Dragseth Theater. Thank you for your help and we hope to see you Friday! Sincerely, Audrey N, Alexis F & Katherine F 1 Heather Branigin From: Steve Timmer <stimmer@planetlawyers.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 1:32 PM To: Kevin Staunton; James Hovland Subject: Ron Erhardt endorsement Gents, I know that both of you have endorsed Ron. I solicited endorsement statements (short) from Melisa Franzen and Paul Rosenthal and wrote them into a story at LeftMN. I'd like to do that with the two of you, too. If you could each give me a few sentences of endorsement, I would appreciate it. I've also gotten an endorsing statement from Ron Way that will be in a story in a few days. Thanks, Steve 1 8800 Highway 7 Suite 401 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 Tel: (952) 933-9639 Fax: (952) 933-8016 www.capsh.org EQUAL HOUSING OP P OR TUN IT Y Home Maintenance & Rehab Legal Services MNSure Application Assistance Planning & Development Reverse Mortgage SNAP (Food Support) Outreach Tax Assistance Helping People. Changing Lives. 1 community Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin PARTNERSHIP OF SUBURBAN HENNEPIN MT Or AMERICA's POVERTY FIGHTING NETWORK You are cordially invited to join Community Action Partnership of Suour6an Hennepin at ourAnnual-Board Meeting and Dinner. Thursday, Warcfi 31, 2016 Minneapolis Marriott Southwest giotel" 5801 Opus Parkway Minnetonka, IITT 55343 5:00 — 5:45 P.M. 6:00 T.M. 7:00 P.M. AGENDA Annual Board' Meeting Dinner guest Spear Hennepin County Commissioner. Jan Callison Menu Choice: 2(er6 Crusted° Walleye or Baked Chicken Breast eZ Thigh or Prosciutto Wrapped PorkLoin or Mushroom Vgatoni Pkase XS.V.P. 6y March 24, 2016 To Char guse a) 952-697-1300 Community Development Energy Assistance Employment Counseling Financial Counseling Financial Literacy Foreclosure Prevention Homebuyer Education Homeless Services Heather Branig in From: Sean Plemmons <sean.plemmons@ecm-inc.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:13 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Edina community guide introduction Mayor Hovland, As I'm sure you've done in the past, the Sun Current is getting ready for the publication of the Edina Community Guide and the first page has a "Welcome to Edina!" short introduction written by yourself. It's generally around 300 words. I don't know if you want to add or take away to what you wrote for last year's community guide, but I thought I would let you know the deadline for writing is April 1. I won't be here to see the completion of the community guide because I recently accepted a new job working for the State. It's been a pleasure working with you and the city council. If you have any questions, you can reply to this email because someone will be continually checking it after I leave. Thanks so much. Sean Plemmons Community Editor Edina Sun Current 1 Heather Branig in From: AndrewX.Nelson <AndrewX.Nelson@target.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 10:33 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Dan Patch Line Mayor Hovland, I recently heard that the Edina City Council has moved it stance from against commuter rail on the Dan Patch Line to now being neutral. Is there any truth to this and if so, could you explain the change in stance? Thank you, Andy Nelson Todd Park Neighborhood 1 KYLE HUNT & PARTNERS INCORPORATED March 8, 2016 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 West 50' St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, We are excited to announce that we have just started a remodeling project at the home of Jeff 8c Lauren Kiesel. Enclosed is a copy of the letter that we sent to those in the neighborhood near the home at 4618 Moorland Avenue informing them of the project. We will do our best to keep the site secured, protected, and maintained throughout the construction process. However, should a problem arise please contact the Project Manager, Glenn Hartmann at 952-476-4564 ext. 31, if you have any questions or concerns. Thank you. Sincerely, President Enclosure KHH/tIch 18324 Minnetonka Boulevard Deephaven, Minnesota 55391 Phone: 952.476.5999 Facsimile. 952.476.2134 WWW. kylehu 11 tpartuers.com Buildcr License Number: 0001067 Minnesota Prayer Breakfast 730 Second Avenue South, Suite 415 Minneapolis, MN 55402 www.minnesotaprayer.org "I urge you, first of all, to pray for all people. Ask God to help them; intercede on their behalf, and give thanks for them. Pray this way for kings and all who are in authority so that we can live peaceful and quiet lives marked by godliness and dignity. This is good and pleases God our Savior..." — St. Paul writing to his young successor Timothy March 9, 2016 Dear Mayor Hovland, We know how hard it is to be a leader — and we believe that prayer helps. In appreciation and support for your role as a Minnesota leader, we invite you to be with us on Tuesday, April 12 at the Minneapolis Hilton for the 56th Minnesota Prayer Breakfast. We will gather to ask for God's help to provide a better life "for all people" and we would be honored by your presence with us. In the long tradition of this event, we have worked to create a unity-building experience that steers clear of divisive religious and political issues, so we can come together under the universal teachings of Jesus. This year our theme will be "Stories of Struggle and Faith." We will be hearing from Minnesota leaders who have experienced failure, persecution and grief in their own lives, and have emerged full of hope in God and a better future. After breakfast, we will be offering six Break-out Sessions, which will explore crucial challenges for all of us in light of Jesus' words and life-example. This event is put together for leaders like you. Our table hosts are eager to offer you a complimentary seat at the Prayer Breakfast. If ethics regulations do not permit you to accept it, we would be happy to make arrangements to accept your payment. The Breakfast runs from 7:00 - 8:40 am, and the Break-outs from 9:00-10:00. Contact me at 612-703-4819 or mooronx@gmail.corn, or visit our minnesotaprayer.org website for answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for your leadership. Please join us. Whether you are able to or not, know that we do pray for you. Sincerely, Steve Moore Minnesota Prayer Breakfast Committee Heather Branigin From: USCM/Tom Cochran <actionalert=usmayors.org@mail222.at181.rsgsv.net> on behalf of USCM/Tom Cochran <actionalert@usmayors.org> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 4:17 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 157 Mayors Help Support Flint THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 1620 EYE STREET NORTHWEST WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006 TELEPHONE (202) 293-7330 FAX (202) 293-2352 URL: www.usmayors.org TO: The Mayor FROM: Torn Cochran, CEO and Executive Director On behalf of Conference of Mayors President Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, I stood today with Mayor Karen Weaver in Flint City Hall to release a bipartisan letter signed by 157 mayors urging President Obama and the U.S. Congress to provide resources needed to help Flint address the ongoing lead water crisis. Former Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin and our Mayors Water Council staff team were with me in City Hall, and all of us have been working to assist Flint since the beginning of this year, 1 This letter has been sent to President Obama at the White House, and to every Member of Congress. We plan to continue this effort and will demonstrate our ongoing support for the City of Flint, and so we encourage you to sign onto the letter if you have not done so already. To add your name, please go to http://usmayors,orgIMayersStandWithFlint. Mayor Weaver Leads During this second USCM trip to Flint, we again met with Mayor Weaver and her team to review the progress that has been made locally to provide safe water the people of Flint. Mayor Weaver campaigned on this issue and has brought public attention and government resources to address it since she took office. We stand with her as she moves to recover Flint's infrastructure, public health, and economy in the wake of this man-made disaster. Today, we worked on a plan to implement this recovery. Lead service lines are beginning to be replaced as funds become available, The Mayor and her team have identified priority homes for pipe replacement to include homes with children under 6, pregnant women, and homes that are still testing positive for lead. The Mayor has a plan in place and the capacity to work on this, but Flint needs funding for implementation. I urge you to continue to support your colleague and the democratically elected leader of Flint, Mayor Karen Weaver, in any way you can. We will be sending you regular updates regarding the Mayor's needs to assist her with her efforts. 2 If you have any questions or would like to assist, please contact me (202-293-7330 / toochrari@usma(ors,m) or my Water Council team, Assistant Executive Director Judy Sheahan (202- 861-6775 / jsheahana.usmayors.org) and Dr. Richard Anderson (202-861-6795 / randersonAusmayors.orq). Copyright © 2016 The United States Conference of Mayors, All rights reserved. To change your contact information, please visit http://wvvw.usmayors.org/contactme. Our mailing address is: The United States Conference of Mayors 1620 I St., N.W. 4th Floor Washington, DC 20006 Add us 10 your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can qpdate your pleferenc.es or unsubscribe from this list 3 Heather Branigin From: Dave and Margie Born <imborn@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 12:40 PM To: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Lake Edina I live on lake Edina and stand with the neighborhood and demand a wall or plants at the west side of Lake Edina. The change to my view, and the noise from the highway with the removal of trees has been unbelievable. The residence deserve better!!! Margie Born 1 Heather Branigin From: Lynn Hu <lynn@environmentminnesota.org> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 1:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Our waters still need your help Attachments: Ag_pollution_endorsementform.pdf Dear City Council Member Hovland, My name is Lynn Hu, and I am working with Environment Minnesota on a campaign to educate the public about corporate agriculture polluting our waters. I hope you had a chance to look over my previous email about the issue, and the endorsement letter as well. I've attached another copy just in case. I plan to follow-up by phone to tell you more about our campaign, and answer any questions you might have. Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your support. Best, Lynn 1 Corporate agribusiness, stop polluting our water. One of the biggest threats to our water is how big corporations are running — and ruining -- many of America's farms. Factory farms generate massive amounts of waste with no place to put it. All too often, this manure — plus huge amounts of fertilizer and chemicals from mega-farms — winds up in our rivers, lakes, and streams. The consequences of this corporate agriculture pollution include an enormous bloom of toxic algae in Lake Erie that contaminated the drinking water of 500,000 people; 100,000 miles of American rivers and streams that are now too polluted for swimming and drinking; and huge biological "dead zones" from the Chesapeake Bay to the Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico in which no life can survive. By and large, the practices needed to curb this pollution are well-known, but these big companies won't stop polluting unless the public demands it. That's why I am joining the call to corporate agribusinesss: Stop polluting our waterways. Name: Business/Organization: Title: Address: Phone: Email: Heather Branigin From: Joel Stegner <joel.r.stegner@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 8:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Transportation Study for the Titus Building project. Dear Council Members, I live at the Colony of Edina, in the same small neighborhood where the Titus Building is located. I have used the services of the building on two occasions. Prior to having a kidney transplant, I received dialysis services on the ground floor of that building. That location provided excellent access for Edina area dialysis patients, many of which continue three or four day a week visits to the facility sometimes for years until their time comes of the waiting list. My wait was short as I had a living donor match, but I saw many patients who were in very frail condition. I could only imagine how hard it would be for them to come up 150 times a year and how important convenience was for them and their friends and family who drove them to the facility. If this business is still operating there (I believe it is), I wonder where it will be relocated, or if they plan to do so. Hopefully, there is an equally convenient place somewhere else in the medical district. I also use a dentist who has officed for a number years in the building. Previously, he had an Edina office on the other side of France at 65th, but was displaced when that building was demolished to make way for the Orthopedics building. It is a very nice office and I'll be sad to see it go. I haven't talked to him about his plans, but I hope he stays somewhere in Edina. By the way, I also saw him earlier in my life at an office in Robbinsdale, where he was displaced by the expansion of North Memorial. He is an excellent dentist and I would hate to see him leave the community or perhaps consolidate with his office in Plymouth. If Edina is interested in supporting existing businesses, I would hope that city government looks out for businesses who get displaced by these projects, as it is easier to keep a thriving business than to pay incentives to bring in someone new. That isn't the main reason I'm writing. I looked over the revised transportation study and felt that the conclusion - that no traffic improvements are necessary, is incorrect, as it is obvious to anyone who lives and travels through the area that the status quo is grossly inadequate,for the reasons I will outline below. The proponent initially talked about their project as being pedestrian friendly. At that time, I was curious how they proposed to do that, not just for their residents but for the whole community. My curiosity increased after I was appointed to the Greater Southdale working group last year. The area is currently pedestrian unfriendly and there is nothing in the project that will improve things, and potentially make them far worse. Currently, the crosswalks at 66th and York/Xerxes are grossly inadequate, actually quite pedestrian unfriendly. Riding a bicycle through the intersection would be extremely 1 dangerous, and there is no easy way to go through the neighborhood on bike or foot, as there are no bike paths or continuous sidewalks. There are sidewalk on the outside of the area, but generally close to the street and with less than perfect crosswalks. The current entrance and exit to the Titus Building off of Xerxes is extremely dangerous, as it occurs after a curve - in a blind spot. The only way to get through the neighborhood are on 65th (which dead ends), Barrie Road and Heritage Drive. Barrie/Heritage was reported to have the highest peak car traffic of any residential neighborhood street in the city without continuous sidewalks - the few walkers are walking in the street in traffic, particularly dangerous in the winter months. Many are taking a short cut via Heritage to Fairview Southdale, traffic that burdens the whole neighborhood. One cannot take sidewalks from the Colony anywhere in the neighborhood - until with a block of those buildings, there are no neighborhood sidewalks, despite plenty of room for them in the single lane 65th street. The Greater Southdale work group has discussed improving traffic flow within the neighborhood. If 65th street were completed to Xerxes part of the project all the traffic wouldn't have to enter the roadway on a blind curve, but with much improved visibility. Traffic speeds on Xerxes (a factor I didn't see noted in the consultant's traffic study) are well over the speed limit. People coming out of that drive way wanting to go East on 66th now have to cross three lanes of traffic, at great risk of an accident. I can understand why the developer wants to make claims that traffic will not be impacted and that there is no immediate need for pedestrian improvements, but at rush hour, when their traffic will load and unload, they will make a bad situation worse, without changes. In a medical building, the traffic other than employees is spread over the day. I would also point out that the Council just approved two other building projects kitty corner across 66th and is being asked to approve a new hotel right across the street. What really is needed is a traffic study for the entire intersection and surrounding roads and walkways done by the city, which would have a more realistic view of what is likely to happen when all the buildings come on line. The time to make any needed street and pedestrian improvements on 65th, 66th and York/Xerxes is sooner rather than later, and making sure that the developers pay a fair portion of the costs. It will take time to build through a 65th street extension and working with the others that are impacted by this. Studies of this should not be delayed. 65th does not have to be a straight road - in fact, it could make a jag and come out on 66th, with a full stop light put in, slowing traffic on Xerxes. The crosswalks at nearby 66th intersectionneed to be totally done with the highest possible quality markings - as seen elsewhere in the city, including the turning lane which is currently unmarked. It would be a good idea to put a blind entrance sign farther north on Xerxes so drivers are more cautious, rather than gunning their engine to beat the light at 66th. At the same time, the stoplights should be upgraded with timing walking signals making it clear to pedestrians and drivers how much time they have to clear the intersection. Given that traffic speeds are also excessive on 66th, with lots of entrances, simply saying that no further work is needed is not really an honest assessment of the situation. Other than completing 65th, the other parts of my suggestion are relatively 2 inexpensive and need to be seriously considered now as conditions for approving this development and the one across the street. While developers might chip in some money and cooperate for the benefit of their customers, it really is up to the city to not delay what what has long been overdue. I do not suggest I am speaking on behalf of any group - my views are purely personal, but I believe are well-informed and reasonable. Thanks for your consideration! Sincerely, Joel Joel Stegner 6312 Barrie Road 1C Edina, MN 55435 952-843-3440 3 Heather Branigin From: Kevin Roche <kevin.h.roche@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 12:21 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Highway 169 rebuild I am writing to urge you and each of the city council members to take immediate action to persuade our legislators to force a revamp of the Highway 169 closure plans. As you know MnDOT, notwithstanding substantial neighborhood and commuter opposition, is bound and determined to shut both directions of Hwy 169 down at the same time to rebuild nine mile creek bridges. This is literally insane. The closure will force people to drive through the Parkwood Knolls and Indian Hills neighborhoods seeking alternatives or going around the closed area. It will have a cascade effect radically increasing traffic in other Edina neighborhoods. These neighborhoods already at rush hours have many cars coming off the highways, especially 62 and 169 and driving recklessly through residential areas, at high speeds, doing 180s, ignoring stop signs, etc. Imagine what is going to happen when 169 is closed. Are we going to wait til some child on a bicycle is killed or there are serious car accidents? And why should Edina residents in these neighborhoods bear the brunt of MnDOT's lunacy. I hope that the council is already trying to address this before it occurs. But the legislature is the best route for changing this, so you all need to talk with our legislators about the seriousness of this issue. There is no reason why MnDOT can't close one side at a time and use the other side for two-way traffic, as it did with the Hwy 100 and Hwy 494 rebuilds. Please, I beg you to do something to stop this. Kevin Roche 6800 Dakota Trail see my website at www.healthy-skeptic.com 1 Heather Branigin From: Divya Danthuluri <divyad21130@isd273.org> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 5:43 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Invitation to Littering in Parks Presentation To whom it may concern, We have been studying the topic of apathy in our 7th grade Language Arts class. Our teachers asked us to find a problem in our community, gather evidence, and create a campaign to inform people about our problem. The problem we are doing for our Apathy Project is Littering in Parks. After visiting the South View Middle School Field, We found over a 100 pieces of trash. We have a solution and we would like to share our project about Littering in Parks with you! Please join us for our presentation in the Dragseth Auditorium at South View Middle School in Edina on March 18th. Our five minute presentation will be from 7:45-8:10 that morning. If you can not make it, we would be more than happy to share our presentation with you! Thank you and we hope to see you on Friday! Cate F, Divya D, and Olivia H. 7th Grade Students, South View Middle School 1 Heather Branigin From: Angie Buyse <iseauski@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 2:18 PM To: jonathan.vlaming@threeriversparks.org Cc: Jane Fox; Connie Lee; Dean Mathews Sr; Lucia Copland; Guy Logan; Carol Logan; Neal Logan; Ben; Mia Blanchett; williamallenwebb@gmail.com; nealjblanchett@gmail.com; betteanderson@yahoo.com; prosen38@yahoo.com; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann@gmail.com Subject: Lake Edina Bike Path small group neighborhood meeting Jonathan: My name is Angie Buyse, and I live at 4729 Hibiscus Avenue. We are hosting the meeting for the small neighborhood gathering regarding the Lake Edina Bike Trail. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the exposure to Highway 100 created by all the tree-clearing, and how Three Rivers plans to mitigate the exposure, noise and visual blight. This meeting needs to take place this week given the fact that you are starting this project on Monday. We are available Tuesday (15th), Thursday (17th) or Friday (18th) evening. Being that you requested a "small group" for this initial meeting, the group of neighbors cc'd on this email represents less than 10% of the neighbors who have expressed concern over the new exposure to the highway. Additionally, we've included/invited Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council. Please "reply all" with your and Eric Nelson's availability this week. Angie Angie Buyse IseaUski@gmail.corn (612) 987-5664 1 Heather Branigin From: Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:49 PM To: Scott H. Neal; Brian Olson; Chad Millner Cc: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Common Sense for Edina - City of Edina commercial truck scale not approved for use by the State of MN Weights and Measures If the city of Edina owns a commercial truck scale it is not registered/approved for use by the state of MN Weights and Measures (see below). Why would the city have a city employee trained to use the scale yet not have the scale approved for the use by the State of MN? Has the commercial truck scale ever been used? Any use of the scale without approval from the state of MN Weights and Measures would be illegal. I would suggest the city contact the state and get the scale approved and the appropriate city staff attend the LTAP education. Below is a link to FREE truck weight education training put on by MN LTAP. http://wvvw mnitap.umn.edu/training/topic/customized/truck-weight/ The city of Edina needs to be more aggressive in weighing over weight construction vehicles given all the damage to our residential streets. David Frenkel From: "VanderPlaats, Greg (COMM)" <greg.vanderplaats©state.mn.us> To: "fren kelatt.n et" <fren kel@att. n et> Cc: "Handzel, Fran (COMM)" <frances.handzelstate.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:33 AM Subject: RE: City of Edina truck scale Sir, I cannot locate a scale owned by the City of Edina in our database, If you have more information, like the address where the scale is located, that would help. It could be that the city owns a scale, that is not used commercially, so we would not test it. Greg VanderPleats Assistant Director, Weights and Measures Minnesota Department of Commerce 14305 Southcross Dr W #150, Burnsville, MN 55306-7011 P: 651-539-1559 1 From: "VanderPlaats, Greg (COMM)" <greg.vanderplaats©state.mn.us> To: David Frenkel <frenkelatt.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:30 AM Subject: RE: City of Edina truck scale David, We test inspect, inspect, and approve scales that are used commercially. We don't calibrate, or make adjustment to them. So if the city of Edina has a scale that is being used commercially, we would like to know about it. Greg VanderPleats Assistant Director, Weights and Measures Minnesota Department of Commerce 14305 Southcross Dr W #150, Burnsville, MN 55306-7011 P: 651-539-1559 From: Brian Olson <bolsonAEdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: spring load restrictions Date: March 1,2016 at 2:21:24 PM CST Cc: Chad Millner <cmillnerEdinaMN.gov> Thank you for writing to us about your concern regarding spring load restrictions. Our normal residential roadway is posted at 5 tons per axle and a permit allows six tons per axle. The Police Department responds to concerns about overweight vehicles and does have a portable scale. If the officer that is trained and certified in the use of the scale is unavailable then the responding officer has the ability to call the state patrol for a weight. Garbage trucks and school buses are exempt from this requirement. I hope this helps, Brian Brian Olson, Public Works Director 952-826-0311 I Fax 952-826-0392 bolsonA.EdinaMN.dov I www.EdinaMN.gov For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business 2 Heather Branigin From: Catherine M. Walker <Catherine.Walker@hennepin.us> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 10:14 AM To: emax33721@aol.com; Kristi-Halverson@comcast.net; jennifer.munt@metc.state.mn.us'; 'jhovland@krausehovland.com'; Janis Callison; 'knelson@edenprairie.org'; 'mbrindle@comcast.net'; akuznia@hopkinsmn.com; 'ntyra-lukens@edenprairie.org'; Peter McLaughlin; 'suesanger@comcast.nef; 'tschneider@eminnetonka.com'; 'twagner@eminnetonka.com'; russ@metrostability.org; 'Will.Roach@bakertilly.com'; Linda Higgins; lisa.goodman@minneapolismn.gov; James Hovland; khalverson@hopkinsmn.com; Marion Greene; krogness@minnehahacreek.org Subject: SW CW Steering Comm - March 17th Meeting Materials Attachments: 1_AgendaMarch2016_FINAL.pdf; Packet_03172016_FINAL.pdf Members Enclosed are the meeting materials for the Thursday, March 17th meeting of the Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee. The meeting will be held at 1:30 PM at the St. Louis Park City Hall. The meeting will include a discussion of state legislative activities including funding for the Southwest LRT project. A resolution to encourage the MN State Legislature to fund the Southwest LRT project will be considered at the meeting. A draft of the resolution will be provided in advance of the meeting for your review and consideration. Thank you and please let me know if you are unable to attend the meeting Katie Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 1 community Works 0-0 '44.4 swIrtcommunityworks.org Southwest LRT Community Works Steering Committee Thursday, March 17, 201 6 1:30 - 3:00 PM Council Chambers, St. Louis Park City Hall Aaenda I. Welcome and Announcements 1:30 to 1:35 PM Hennepin County Commissioner Jan Callison Approval of the January 2016 Meeting Minutes* 1:35 to 1:40 PM Hennepin County Commissioner Jan Callison (Action) III. Committee Updates 1:40 to 1:50 PM Technical Implementation Committee (TIC) PLACES committee Business & Community Advisory Committees (BAC/CAC) IV. Marketing/Communications Eden Prairie Stations Video Annual Report V. Legislative Update VI. Resolution: Support SW LRT State Funding VI. Finance Tools Julie Wischnack, Minnetonka 1:50 to 2:05 PM 2:05 to 2:25 PM 2:25 to 2:30 PM (Action) 2:30 to 2:45 PM VII. Community Development Update 2:45 to 3:00 PM *enclosed The next Southwest Community Works Steering Committee meeting will be held on Thursday, May 19, 2016 at the St. Louis Park City Hall at 1:30 PM. EDEN PRAIRIE KA MINNETONKA b EDINA LI HOPKINS I ST. LOUIS PARK 0 MINNEAPOLIS METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Heather Branigin From: Dr. Ryan Enos <noreply@qemailserver.com> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 10:20 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Harvard University Mayors Survey Project Dear Mayor Hovland, We would like to invite you to take part in a survey as part of a study conducted by researchers at Harvard University. We want to know more about mayors, like you. By participating in the survey, you have the opportunity to provide valuable information about mayors' policy priorities, primary information sources, and goals for their tenure in office. We appreciate your time, and hope that you will take advantage of this chance to further our understanding of important aspects of your work in municipal government. The research is being done by Dr. Ryan Enos, Associate Professor from Harvard University, and Peter Bucchianeri, Riley Carney, Gabrielle Malina, and Amy Uden, graduate students in the Harvard University Government Department. The survey will only take you about 10 minutes, and you can skip questions that you do not want to answer or stop the survey at any time. We will not share your individual answers with anyone. We are only interested in understanding the general experiences of elected mayors. If you're willing to share your experiences, please follow this link to the Survey: Take the Survey Questions? Please contact Dr. Ryan Enos, Associate Professor, Harvard University Department of Government, at renosAgov.harvard.edu, 617-496-1724, or 737 Cambridge St, CGIS Knafel Building 406, Cambridge MA 02138. Thank you for your time. Best regards, Dr. Ryan Enos 1 Associate Professor Harvard University Department of Government Having trouble with the survey link? Please copy and paste the URL below into your interne browser: https ://harvard.az 1 .qualtrics.com/SE?Q S S=OB 1 S3 IscG5AWTWJ cMWXd2DW1 zdkfS 5 &Q CHL=email Follow the link to opt out of future emails: Click here to unsubscribe 2 Heather Branigin From: Vlaming, Jonathan <Jonathan.Viaming@threeriversparks.org> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 12:45 PM To: Angie Buyse Cc: Jane Fox; Connie Lee; Dean Mathews Sr; Lucia Copland; Guy Logan; Carol Logan; Neal Logan; Ben; Mia Blanchett; williamallenwebb@gmail.com; nealjblanchett@gmail.com; betteanderson@yahoo.com; prosen38@yahoo.com; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann@gmail.com; Nelson, Eric; Gurski, Amy; Chad Millner Subject: RE: Lake Edina Bike Path small group neighborhood meeting Great — We have the Mayor's Conference Room reserved from 6 to 7 PM tomorrow evening. It is the room immediately to the left as you enter the front doors. See you there. Jonathan From: Angie Buyse [mailto:iseauski@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 12:02 PM To: Via ming, Jonathan Cc: Jane Fox; Connie Lee; Dean Mathews Sr; Lucia Copland; Guy Logan; Carol Logan; Neal Logan; Ben; Mia Blanchett; williamallenwebbPgmail.com; nealiblanchett@gmail.com; betteanderson@yahoo.com; prosen38@yahoo.conn; ihovland@edinannn.gov; mbrindle@edinamn.gov; kstaunton@edinamn.gov; rstewart@edinamn.gov; swensonann@gmail.com; Nelson, Eric; Gurski, Amy Subject: Re: Lake Edina Bike Path small group neighborhood meeting 6 pm at Edina City Hall seems like a great option. We will see you there. Thank you, Angie Sent from my iPhone... Angie Buyse (612) 987-5664 On Mar 14, 2016, at 10:32 AM, Vlaming, Jonathan <Jonathan.Vlaming@threeriversparks.org> wrote: Hi Angie, Eric Nelson, our trail project manager, and I can meet this Tuesday, March 15. We are also on the City Council agenda that evening for their meeting that starts at 7 PM. Would it be possible to meet at your house at 6 PM? My wife is out of town this week, and I'll be shuttling my kids around, so I am not able to do an earlier meeting. Alternatively, we could meet at City Hall, which might work better for the elected officials. Hwy 100 trail bridge construction is starting this week. However, the trail construction by Lake Edina is not scheduled to occur until after we have had a chance to do the on-site meeting with all Lake Edina residents, now tentatively scheduled for Saturday April 9th. I can't schedule the big meeting earlier without running into potential conflicts with people being out of town for the Edina Schools spring 1 break. Once I have had a chance to check in with the City Council and Mayor, I will finalize the date and send out invites to everyone. Please let me know if Tuesday @ 6 PM works, and your preference for meeting location. I look forward to meeting you and your neighbors. <image001.jpg> Jonathan Vlaming Associate Superintendent - Planning, Design & Technology Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Ln N Plymouth, MN 55441 Wk: 763-694-7632 Cell: 612-490-5220 From: Angie Buyse [mailto:iseauski@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 13, 20162:18 PM To: Vlaming, Jonathan Cc: Jane Fox; Connie Lee; Dean Mathews Sr; Lucia Copland; Guy Logan; Carol Logan; Neal Logan; Ben; Mia Blanchett; williamallenwebb@gmail.com; nealjblanchett@gmail.com; betteanderson@yahoo.com; prosen38@yahoo.com; ihovland@edinarnn.gov; mbrindle@edinamn.gov; kstaunton@edinamn.gov; rstewart@edinamn.gov; swensonann@gmail.com Subject: Lake Edina Bike Path small group neighborhood meeting Jonathan: My name is Angie Buyse, and I live at 4729 Hibiscus Avenue. We are hosting the meeting for the small neighborhood gathering regarding the Lake Edina Bike Trail. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the exposure to Highway 100 created by all the tree-clearing, and how Three Rivers plans to mitigate the exposure, noise and visual blight. This meeting needs to take place this week given the fact that you are starting this project on Monday. We are available Tuesday (15th), Thursday (17th) or Friday (18th) evening. Being that you requested a "small group" for this initial meeting, the group of neighbors cc'd on this email represents less than 10% of the neighbors who have expressed concern over the new exposure to the highway. Additionally, we've included/invited Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council. Please "reply all" with your and Eric Nelson's availability this week. Angie Angie Buyse IseaUski@gmail.com 2 (612) 987-5664 Heather Branigin From: Catherine M. Walker <Catherine.Walker@hennepin.us> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 1:07 PM To: emax33721@aol.com; Kristi-Halverson@comcast.net; 'jennifer.munt@metc.state.mn.us'; 'jhovland@krausehovland.com'; Janis Callison; 'knelson@edenprairie.org'; 'mbrindle@comcast.nef; akuznia@hopkinsmn.com; 'ntyra-lukens@edenprairie.org'; Peter McLaughlin; 'suesanger@comcast.net; 'tschneider@eminnetonka.com'; 'twagner@eminnetonka.com'; russ@metrostability.org; 'Will.Roach@bakertilly.com'; Linda Higgins; lisa.goodman@minneapolismn.gov; James Hovland; khalverson@hopkinsmn.com; Marion Greene; krogness@minnehahacreek.org Subject: Clarification on Met Council Request Members....Just a quick clarification that the Met Council is requesting $135 million for the Southwest LRT project not $151 million. Thank you Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 1 Heather Branigin From: Steve Timmer <stimmer@planetlawyers.com> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 8:14 PM To: Kevin Staunton Cc: James Hovland Subject: RE: Ron Erhardt endorsement Thanks, Kevin; this is great. s Original Message From: Kevin Staunton [mailto:KStaunton@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 7:50 PM To: Steve Timmer Cc: James Hovland Subject: Re: Ron Erhardt endorsement Steve - here's what I have to say about my decision to support Ron: "For over 25 years, Ron Erhardt has been a pragmatic and effective advocate for Edina. Working from both sides of the aisle, he has brought Edina's values to the state capitol and effectively advocated for initiatives that have made both the state and city better places. His work over the years on our state's transportation infrastructure and the key role he played in securing funding for Edina's Veteran's Memorial last year are just two examples of the kind of representation that has earned my support for his effort to return to the legislature for another term. " Hope that fulfills your needs. From: Steve Timmer <stimmer@planetlawvers.com<mailto:stimmer@planetlawvers.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 2:32 PM To: Kevin Staunton <kstaunton@EdinaMN.gov<mailto:kstaunton@EdinaMN.gov>>, James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov<mailto:JHovland@EdinaMN.gov>> Subject: Ron Erhardt endorsement Gents, I know that both of you have endorsed Ron. I solicited endorsement statements (short) from Melisa Franzen and Paul Rosenthal and wrote them into a story at LeftMN<http://left.mn/2016/03/endorsing-ron-erhardt/>. I'd like to do that with the two of you, too. If you could each give me a few sentences of endorsement, I would appreciate it. I've also gotten an endorsing statement from Ron Way that will be in a story in a few days. Thanks, Steve 1 1 '116 -C>t ic"‘t9 37.1 g---)7 5,V '5)-7 Thy_ LEMAGINUNEEIOTA A44e446% 6(71ES 6/046 ) A 771— 4'A'19' AA /ec r4 40€10 "/701-( (-(71/tec-e;14-g-4(// 9(-4 et /1/42 7(V(f 42/7 1/7-(al from the desk of DAVID J. UNMACHT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR I / 1 AL- C, , eafr4/ - tila*gy cr,r7(-- A6L- h rot.. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES David Unmacht, Executive Director (651) 281-1205 I dunmacht@lmc.org I www.lmc.org 145 University Ave. West I St. Paul, MN 55103 Heather Branigin From: Neal Blanchett <nealjblanchett@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 1:28 PM To: Neal Logan Cc: William Webb; Gurski, Amy; James Hovland; Lucia Copland; Mia Blanchett; Mary Brindle; betteanderson@yahoo.com; swensonann@gmail.com; Jane Fox; Carol Logan; Vlaming, Jonathan; Guy Logan; Ben; Angie Buyse; Dean Mathews Sr; Chad Millner; Connie Lee; Kevin Staunton; prosen38@yahoo.com; Nelson, Eric; Robert Stewart Subject: RE: Lake Edina Bike Path small group neighborhood meeting I cannot make tonight, but as a preliminary comment, it seems like it would not be complicated to bring up the 2 "dips" to the level of the rest of the berm. Wouldn't that also improve ADA compliance by reducing slopes? I hope it could be done with fill and compaction, relatively quickly. The key then would be thick evergreen tree coverage. If watering the new trees is an issue, can it be pumped either from Lake Edina or from the pond between the berm and Lake Edina? A smart planting plan with multiple rows would really improve the experience for trail users, as that berm is really exposed to traffic, both noise and visually. Thanks for the meeting, I hope it is productive. On Mar 14, 2016 2:49 PM, "Neal Logan" <neallogan@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you! 1 Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Park Board Meeting, February 9, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Park Board, February 9, 2016 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 3/8/2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Park Board Edina City Hall, Council Chambers February 9, 2016 I. Call To Order Chair Gieseke called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Gieseke, Members Jones, Good, McCormick, Strother, Nelson, Greene and Student Member Lohani. Staff present: Park Board Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Support Specialist Janet Canton and Edina Art Center General Manager Michael Frey, III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Good to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Jones. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Strother to approve the Jan. 12, 2016 minutes. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Grandview Facility Operational and Feasibility Study Staff Liaison Kattreh introduced the following members of the task force and consulting team that were present: Victor Pechaty, HGA George Sutton, Sutton & Associates Sara Shaylie, Sutton & Associates Michael Frey, Edina Art Center General Manager Susan Faus, Assistant Director Parks & Recreation Staff Liaison Kattreh informed the Park Board that tonight’s presentation will be the same presentation they plan to give the City Council at next week’s work session. She noted that Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 3/8/2016 the goal for the work session is to receive feedback from the City Council on the core and enhanced programs they would like the task force to pursue moving forward with the feasibility study. She stressed it’s very important to receive feedback from the Park Board tonight. Mr. Pechaty gave a Power Point presentation to the Park Board on where they currently are. He indicated they are approximately half-way through at this juncture having identified some potential programs for the facility, created a needs assessment and market analysis as well as assigned some potential construction costs and operating costs for a range of alternatives. Park Board members asked questions and gave their feedback during the process. Members Greene and Nelson left the meeting at 8:13 p.m. Members Jones showed the Park Board two charts she put together. One was with regards to program space and the second chart was with regards to the core cost recovery. Staff Liaison Kattreh thanked the Park Board for their great feedback. B. 2016 Annual Work Plan Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus went through each initiative of the work plan and discussed the timeline. She explained to the Park Board she will provide more details about the process with each board member when they have their initial kick-off meeting. C. Election of Officers Chair Gieseke stated that because they no longer have a quorum they will need to table the election of officers to the March Park Board meeting. VII. Correspondence And Petitions None VIII. Chair And Member Comments Chair Gieseke indicated that at the end of the month Members Jones and Segreto terms on the Park Board will come to an end. He thanked them for their six years of wonderful service; it is very much appreciated. Member Jones thanked the Park Board and staff for always being so good to work with. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 3/8/2016 IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh made the following staff comments: • A new high efficiency filter was installed at the Edina Aquatic Center • On Jan. 30 Centennial Lakes hosted the Quinn’s Cup; there were hundreds of participants • Braemar Golf Course, along with Hoigaards, hosted a snow shoe event in January and will be hosting another one in February • Both the golf dome and Tin Fish are doing well; they have been very busy • Braemar Arena will be hosting an event called “Frozen Fantastical” on Feb. 16 • Braemar Field will be offering some teen nights for ages 11 to 17 • The indoor walking track at Braemar Field has been getting a lot of use • They are hoping to keep the outdoor ice rinks open through the end of the month, weather pending • Thanked Member Jones and Member Segreto for the wonderful service and guidance they have provided to both the Park Board and staff X. Adjournment Motion made by Gieseke to adjourn the Feb. 9, 2016 meeting at 8:55 p.m. Motion seconded by Good. Motion carried. Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Support Item Activity: Subject:Planning Commission Meeting, February 10, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached are the February 10, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for your information Date: March 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: XIII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Upcoming Meetings, Dates Events as of March 15, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, information only. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Schedule of Upcoming Meetings, Dates & Events CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF MARCH 15, 2016 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Wed Mar 15 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Mar 15 Work Session – Energy & Environment Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Mar 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Apr 5 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Apr 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Apr 19 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Apr 19 Work Session – Grandview Facility Operation & Feasibility Study 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Apr 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Wed Apr 20 2016 Annual Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 P.M. BRAEMAR GOLF CLUB HOUSE Thur Apr 21 Board of Appeals and Equalization 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues May 3 Work Session – State of Infrastructure/Business Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur May 12 Continuation Date Board of Appeals and Equalization 5:30 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues May 17 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 17 Work Session – Planning Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon May 30 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed