Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016-05-17 City Council Regular Meeting
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, May 17, 2016 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting. V.Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes, May 3, 2016 Work Session and May 3, 2016 Regular Council Meeting B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 4/28/2016 TOTAL: $499,026.80 And Per Pre-List Dated 5/05/2016 TOTAL: $413,073.22 C.Resolution No. 2016-54 Approving Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant - Minnesota Department of Health D.Reject Bid - Contract No. ENG 16-10 Wooddale Avenue Bridge and Valley View Pedestrian Bridge E.TraCc Safety Report of April 6, 2016 F.Request for Purchase - Authorize Non-Invasive Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment Services G.Request for Purchase - Cornelia Tennis Courts Resurfacing H.Request for Purchase - Creek Valley Park Tennis Courts I.Request for an Extension of the Preliminary Plat for Berman Woods, 5331 Evanswood Lane VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Proclaming EMS Week B.Mike Sitari OCcer of the Year - Mike Seeger C.2016 Edina Heritage Award - 5201 Wooddale Avenue D.Proclamation for 50th Anniversary of the Edina Art Fair E.Proclaiming National Kids to Parks Day F.2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary G.Grandview District Transportation Study Presentation H.April Speak Up, Edina Presentation VII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eCcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2016-06 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Regarding Scoreboards B.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2016-55 Adding Edina Heritage Landmark District Zoning Designation to Wooddale Bridge No. 90646 VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Vacant Land Purchase Agreement: Weber Woods B.Ordinance No. 2016-07 & Resolution No. 2016-53; Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan and Development Contract for DLC at 3250 West 66th Street - The Millennium at Southdale C.Grandview Feasibility and Operational Analysis Final Report D.Braemar Golf Course Renovation Bid Authorization E.Braemar Park Winter Recreation Proposal F.Resolution No. 2016-46 Accepting Various Donations & Grants IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence B.Receive Petition Requesting Sidewalk On West Woodland Road C.Minutes 1.Minutes: Heritage Preservation Board, April 12, 2016 2.Minutes: Park Board, April 12, 2016 X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor and Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments XIII.Schedule of Dates, Events & Meetings as of May 17, 2016 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliLcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes, Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes, May 3, 2016 Work Session and May 3, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description May 3, 2016 Draft Regular City Council Meeting Minutes May 3, 2016 Draft Work Session Minutes Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 3, 2016 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. Absent at rollcall was Members Brindle. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the consent agenda as follows: V.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of April 19, 2016 and Town Hall meeting minutes of April 9, 2016 V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 14, 2016, and consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $151,718.09; Police Special Revenue $3,937.29; Arts and Culture Fund $245.50; Working Capital Fund $3,265.46; Equipment Replacement Fund $27,939.79; Art Center Fund $880.60; Golf Dome Fund $2,007.41; Aquatic Center Fund $166,791.28; Golf Course Fund $15,202.30; Ice Arena Fund $16,310.32; Edinborough Park Fund $8,027.25; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,731.22; Liquor Fund $252,474.57; Utility Fund $440,589.32; Storm Sewer Fund $1,235.94; Recycling Fund $37,184.67; Risk Management ISF $158.70; PSTF Agency Fund $2,620.43; Centennial TIF District $10,592.35; Grandview TIF District $14,677.03; Southdale 2 District $4,415.46; Pentagon Park District $578.32; Payroll Fund $6,474.70; TOTAL $1,170,058.00 and for receipt of payment of claims dated April 21, 2016, and consisting of 34 pages; General Fund $224,947.01; Police Special Revenue $302.31; Working Capital Fund $39,574.51; Equipment Replacement Fund $46,744.71; Art Center Fund $7,365.64; Golf Dome Fund $1,124,00; Aquatic Center Fund $1,631.58; Golf Course Fund $106,983.27; Ice Arena Fund $12,227.14; Sports Dome Fund $11,576.68; Edinborough Park Fund $37,274.50; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,334.52; Liquor Fund $152,434.68; Utility Fund $60,939.80; Risk Management ISF $292,354.11; PSTF Agency Fund $18,825.69; Centennial TIF District $793.75; Grandview TIF District $7,773.75; Southdale 2 District $928.75; TOTAL Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2016 Page 2 $1,027,136.40; and, Credit Card Transactions dated January 26 – February 25, 2016; TOTAL $45,053.41 V.C. Request for Purchase, 2016 Western Star Plow Truck, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Boyer Truck (State Contract No. 77960) and TBEI (State Contract No. 100779) at $212,668.00 V.D. Request for Purchase, 2016 Chevy Colorado, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, National Auto Fleet Group (NJPA Contract No. 102811) and Stonebrooke Equipment (State Contract No. 73054) at $32,291.86 V.E. Approve Memorandum of Understanding for Edina Fall into the Arts Festival V.F. Request for Purchase; 2016 Commodities Quotes – 1. Ready Mix Bituminous Materials, 2. Concrete, 3. Hydrofluosilicic Acid, 4. Liquid Chlorine, 5. Polyphosphate Ortho-phosphate Blend Water Treatment Chemical-50/50 Blend, 6. Tonkazorb 3%, 7. Caustic Soda, 8. Covers and Castings; awarding the bids to the recommended low bidders as follows: 1a. (SPNWB330B) MnDOT Non-Wear SpecNo. 2360 to Bituminous Roadways (picked up) at $36.10 per ton; 1b. (SPWEA340B) MnDOT Wear SpecNo. 2360 to Bituminous Roadways (picked up) at $40.10 per ton; 1c. (SPWEB340B) MnDOT Wear SpecNo. 2360 to Bituminous Roadways (picked up) at $37.35 per ton; 2a. Concrete Type 3A32-1 – 3900 lbs. Approximately 200 cubic yards to AVR (delivered) at $145.00 per cubic yard; 2b. Concrete Type 3A32-1 – 3900 lbs. Approximately 400 cubic yards to AVR (delivered) at $121.00 per cubic yard; 3. Hydrofluosilicic Acid Approximately 123,000 lbs. to DPC (delivered) at $26.50 per cwt; 4. Liquid Chlorine Approximately 130,000 lbs. per year to DPC (delivered) at $34.00 per cwt; 5. Polyphosphate Ortho-phosphate Blend Water Treatment Chemical- 50/50 Blend Approximately 9,800 Gallons to DPC (delivered) at $4.97 per cwt; 6. Tonkazorb 3% Approximately 11,000 Gallons to Hawkins (delivered) at $12.53 per cwt; 7. Caustic Soda Approximately 1,000 Gallons to DPC (delivered) at $31.00 per cwt; 8a. Sanitary Sewer – R1733 with Self Sealing Solid Cover to ESS at $260.00 each for Complete Casting and Lid, $120.00 each for Casting Only, and $140.00 each for Lid Only; 8b. Storm Sewer – Round Lid R2548 to ESS at $260.00 each for Complete Casting and Lid, $120.00 each for Casting Only, and $140.00 each for Lid Only; 8c. Storm Sewer – Rectangular 3067V to ESS at $368.00 each for Complete Casting and Lid, $150.00 each for Casting Only, and $118.00 each for Lid Only; 8d. Cost of Curb Box to ESS at $100.00 each. V.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-52, Approving Cooperative Agreement between City of Edina and County of Hennepin for Rehabilitation of Vernon Avenue and West 50th Street V.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-47, Eliminating a Condition of Rezoning Approval Requiring a Sprinkler System V.I. Approve Agreement with Hennepin County Regarding Electronic Pollbooks for Elections Rollcall: Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-44 ADOPTED – PUBLIC ART AT BRAEMAR ARENA Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2016 Page 3 Assistant Parks and Recreation Director Faus shared that the Braemar Arena community spearheaded by Council Member Swenson had raised funds to make Braemar Arena the permanent home to Slapshot, a steel art sculpture of a hockey player by artist Judd Nelson. $7,506.13 was raised through a GoFundMe account. The original price was $9,000.00, but Mr. Nelson graciously lowered the price to $7,500.00. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-44, Accepting Donations on Behalf of the City of Edina. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. PRESERVATION MONTH – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read the Preservation Month May 2016 Proclamation. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving proclamation declaring May 2016 as Preservation Month in the City of Edina. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.C. NATIONAL POLICE WEEK – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read the National Police Week Proclamation. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving proclamation declaring May 9 – May 15, 2016 as National Police Week in the City of Edina. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Sergeant Brian Hubbard accepted the Proclamation, talked about the police department, and thanked the Council. VI.D. NATIONAL TEACHER’S DAY – PROCLAIMED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving proclamation declaring May 3, 2016 as National Teacher Day in the City of Edina. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.E. NATIONAL BIKE TO SCHOOL DAY – PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read the National Bike to School Day Proclamation. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving proclamation declaring May 4, 2016 as National Bike to School Day in the City of Edina. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.F. STATE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC WORKS WEEK – PRESENTED AND PROCLAIMED Engineer Millner explained that the Infrastructure of Edina was hidden from the untrained eye and the purpose of tonight’s presentation was to make Edina’s Public Works Department more visible and understood by all. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2016 Page 4 Public Works Director Olson discussed the Public Works Department in more detail and described some of the challenges it faces. Mayor Hovland read the Public Works Week Proclamation. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving proclamation declaring the week of May 15-21, 2016 as National Public Works Week in the City of Edina. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Olson received the proclamation. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VII.A. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT RE: SETBACKS IN THE PUD-7 DISTRICT, ORDINANCE SECTION REFERENCES, AND SIGNAGE REGULATIONS – ORDINANCE NO. 2016-05 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague shared that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment contained routine housekeeping items and briefly explained the seven updates or corrections. Mr. Teague requested that the Council waive Second Reading and adopt the Ordinance. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2016-05, Amending Setbacks in the PUD-7 District, Ordinance Section References, and Signage Regulations. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. SITE PLAN REVIEW WITH VARIANCES AND SUBDIVISION FOR NOBLE INVESTMENTS, 10 SOUTHDALE CENTER – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-49 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2016-50 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague explained that Noble Investments was proposing to construct a 146-room Hilton Homewood Suites hotel at the Northeast corner of Southdale. The site was currently an overflow parking lot and storage area. Mr. Teague presented a site map; sketch plan; changes to the plan based on feedback from the Planning Commission; requirements including site plan review; setback and parking space variances; and, a subdivision. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2016 Page 5 Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council related to parking and approval for the sidewalk from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Proponent Presentation Gary Tushie, Tushie Montgomer Architects, further discussed the changes that had been made to the proposal based on feedback from the Planning Commission and presented renderings of the proposed hotel. Mr. Tushie answered questions of the Council related to landscaping. The Council discussed the project and each shared their opinion. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. Public Testimony Lori Syverson, 3300 Edinborough Way No. 150, addressed the Council. Shelly Loberg, 3300 Edinborough Way No. 150, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Charles Rickert, WSB Traffic Consultant answered a question of the Council related to the Traffic Study. John Phipps, Simon Properties, answered a question of the Council related to a proof of parking requirement. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-49, Approving a Site Plan with Variances at 10 Southdale Center to Build a 146-Room Hilton Homewood Suites Hotel for Noble Investments, subject to the following conditions: A. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped February 29, 2016. • Grading plan date stamped February 29, 2016. • Landscaping plan date stamped February 29, 2016. • Building elevations date stamped February 29, 2016. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. B. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2016 Page 6 C. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. D. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. E. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated April 6, 2016. F. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. G. Bike racks must be provided to meet minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. H. Pedestrian Crossing to the island and signage improvements to be paid by the developer and landscape and gabion wall improvements on the island as shown on the architect’s renderings conditioned upon necessary approvals by the City and the County. I. Additional landscaping/vegetation along 66th must be added in between the sidewalk and 66th Street. Member Staunton seconded the motion. The Council continued to discuss the project and expressed their support. Rollcall: Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-50, Approving a Preliminary Plat at 10 Southdale Center to Build a 146-Room Hilton Homewood Suites Hotel for Noble Investments, subject to the following condition: 1. Park Dedication fee of $18,460 will be required at the time of final plat. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-51 ADOPTED – ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-51 accepting various grants and donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-48 PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF BONDS, SERIES 2016A – ADOPTED Finance Director Roggeman explained that the Resolution was the first step in the process to sell $17,445,000.00 in General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016A. The proceeds of the bond issue would be used by the City to finance summer street and utility improvement projects. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 3, 2016 Page 7 Nick Anhut, Ehlers & Associates, further explained the five purposes of the General Obligation Bonds. The advance refunding proceeds would be used to reduce the City’s net interest expense. The interest rate on the debt was currently 4.0-4.25% and was expected to be lowered to 1.0- 2.55%. The interest savings was expected to be $458,000.00. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-48, Providing for the Sale of $17,445,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016A. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. PLANNING COMMISSION, APRIL 13, 2016 2. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, MARCH 22, 2016 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETING, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF MAY 3, 2016 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 17, 2016. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the May 3, 2016, meeting available. MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 3, 2016 5:33 P.M. Mayor Pro Tem Swenson called the work session of the Edina City Council to order 5:33 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering rollcall was: Members Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Pro Tem Swenson. Mayor Hovland entered the meeting at 5:35 p.m. Member Brindle was absent. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer; Ann Kattreh, Park & Recreation Director; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; Eric Roggeman, Finance Director; Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer. QUARTERLY BUSINESS MEETING Finance Director Roggeman presented a brief synopsis of the City’s finances. He gave an unaudited 2015 Preliminary General Fund summary showing that 2015 revenue were at 105% of budget, expenditures were 99% of budget and that license and permit revenue was higher than budgeted for the seventh year. It was noted that the General Fund transfer from the liquor fund had been cancelled due to a lower net profit, but that during 2015 the City received $800,000 in Park Dedication funds with $500,000 being transferred to the Construction Fund to fund the Park Signage Improvement Project. Mr. Roggeman reviewed the revenue for 2015 for the Utilities Fund, Liquor Fund Operating Revenue and Operating Income, Aquatic Center Operating Revenue, Golf Course Fund Operating Revenue, Arena Operating Revenue, Art Center Operating Revenue, Edinborough Operating Revenue, and Centennial Lakes Operating Revenue. Mr. Roggeman explained the GASB 68 accounting changes that required the City to report Edina’s proportionate share of PERA’s unfunded pension liability. The GASB 68 accounting change does not change employee or retiree benefits and will not change the City’s annual cash funding requirements. Mr. Roggeman noted there be unallocated reserves in the General Fund, however, at a lower amount than in recent years. He said staff would be back at the completion of the City’s audit with a recommendation for the best use of the 2015 unallocated reserves. Mr. Roggeman explained the 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) prioritization process and timeline. The Council and staff discussed ways for Council to give input into the development of the Capital Improvement Plan, the themes to consider in the 2017-2021 CIP, the CIP timing, proposed 2016-2017 CIP levy, the greater emphasis on environmental impact Minutes/Edina City Council Work Session/May 3, 2016 2 of projects under consideration and the new Conservation and Sustainability Fund. The Council indicated an interest to become involved in the process as early as possible. STATE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT Engineering Director Millner and Public Works Director Olson presented a comprehensive report outlining the state of the City of Edina’s infrastructure. Their presentation included 2015 accomplishments and proposed initiatives for 2016, the status of the Water, Sanitary and Stormwater Utilities and a status report on the 2016 Living Streets and local transportation systems. Detailed data were supplied in writing to Council members for review. Discussion items included: the accomplishments from 2015, 2016 proposed initiatives, challenges to accomplishing infrastructure rehabilitation, areas of interest and concern and how to address funding the necessary maintenance and rehabilitation of a major public asset to the maximize benefits for the community. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May17, 2016. James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 4/28/2016 TOTAL: $499,026.80 And Per Pre-List Dated 5/05/2016 TOTAL: $413,073.22 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment. INTRODUCTION: Detailed claims list is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Claims Pre-List Dated 04/28/2016 TOTAL: $499,026.80 Claims Pre-List Dated 5/05/2016 TOTAL: $413,073.22 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 - Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3013 4/28/2016 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 453.49 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 399642 21604121 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 453.49 3014 4/28/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 78.40 399484 1990955 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 80.80 399687 1994504 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 159.20 3015 4/28/2016 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 493.34 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 399649 144928 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 493.34 3016 4/28/2016 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 4,946.50 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLANNING 399728 23271474.00-5 03497.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Valley View & Tracy Impr 4,946.50 3017 4/28/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 745.75 399489 53153800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 443.10 399490 53158100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 398.20 399692 53262800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 363.94 399493 6642600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 121.31 399492 6644300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 62.92 399494 93739400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 228.83 399798 93770100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 69.87 399491 93770300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,433.92 3018 4/28/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 44.58 POSTCARDS 399730 0E-418981-1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 14.49 FILE FOLDERS 399405 0E-419202-1 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 3.96 OFFICE SUPLIES 399404 WO-192941-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 46.05 OFFICE SUPLIES 399404 WO-192941-1 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 5.49 SUPPLIES 00003038 399406 WO-192991-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 82.43 CARDSTOCK PAPER 399403 W0-193030-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 29.89 DESKTOP ORGANIZER 399407 W0-193078-1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 106.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 399731 WO-194024-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 333.19 3019 4/28/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 52.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 399732 117950 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 — Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3019 4/28/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS Continued... 52.99 3020 4/28/2016 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 14,700.00 SANITARY SEWER REHAB 399734 0188482 03486.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORTHWEST SANITARY STUDY 8,500.00 DESIGN/BIDDING SERVICES 00001772 399523 0188994 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 23,200.00 3021 4/28/2016 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 92.79 OIL FILTERS 00005291 399524 1051242 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.79 3022 4/28/2016 102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC. 557.56 TOUCHSCREEN 399626 CPJ7989 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 557.56 3023 4/28/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 327.80 399698 67-85 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 327.80 3024 4/28/2016 104020 DALCO 510.18 TISSUE, TOWELS 399746 3014447 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 510.18 3025 4/28/2016 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 144.00 CARAMEL CORN 399748 2129 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 144.00 3026 4/28/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 335.00 ENERGY PUBLICATION 399749 334456 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 335.00 3027 4/28/2016 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 29,487.56 MAR 2016 LODGING TAX 399629 MAR2106 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 29,487.56 3028 4/28/2016 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 399750 2469195 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 3029 4/28/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 -- 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3029 4/28/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC Continued... 8,040.00 REPLACE SEWER/WATER LINES 00002544 399757 14414 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MORNINGSIDE A RECON 7,070.00 REPLACE SEWER/WATER LINES 399758 14415 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 15,110.00 3030 4/28/2016 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 940.50 FIELD PAINT 00001819 399428 111227 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 940.50 3031 4/28/2016 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 226.20 GARAGE DOOR MAINTENANCE 399761 D318480-IN 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 226.20 3032 4/28/2016 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 156.30 CHEMICAL FEED REPAIRS 00001773 399670 985949 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 3,575.10 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 00001699 399564 986231 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 149.06 CHEMICAL FEED REPAIRS 00001774 399671 986390 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 3,880.46 3033 4/28/2016 100858 LOGIS 1,017.50 IT SWITCH 399633 41641 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 82.50 SWITCH SETUP 399633 41641 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 314.91 9 YR RENEWAL 399632 41719 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,931.50 GOLF SWITCH 399632 41719 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 6,375.53 GOLF SWITCHES 399632 41719 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 314.91 9 YR RENEWAL 399632 41719 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION 11,036.85 3034 4/28/2016 101792 LUBE-TECH 590.62 MOBIL GREASE 399566 765458 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 590.62 3035 4/28/2016 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 651.28 399823 215468 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 660.39 399822 215469 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 576.69 399824 215470 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,888.36 3036 4/28/2016 101483 MENARDS 3.02 CONDUIT 00006364 399672 10545 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 86.51 DUGOUT MATERIALS 00001857 399767 11431 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 - Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3036 4/28/2016 101483 MENARDS Continued... 89.53 3037 4/28/2016 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 391.10 SUPPLIES 399768 38266 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 448.05 SUPPLIES 399768 38266 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 839.15 3038 4/28/2016 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 97.26 WHEEL, ROLLERS, V-BELT 00006486 399674 1057367-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 97.26 3039 4/28/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 156.00 TIRES 00005141 399571 210227676 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 156.00 3040 4/28/2016 124836 PR DIAMOND PRODUCTS INC. 2,097.00 PIPE SAW 00001762 399572 0040629-IN 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 2,097.00 3041 4/28/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 333.70 NAPKINS 399780 9048 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 770.12 TOWELS, LINERS, WYPALL 399780 9048 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 195.44 HOT CUPS, LIDS 399776 9100 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 476.28 TISSUE, GLOVES, LINERS 00002155 399779 9101 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 604.28 PLATES, COLD CUPS, LIDS 399777 9105 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 882.39 CUTLERY, PLATES, CUPS 399778 9111 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,262.21 3042 4/28/2016 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 105.50 DOOR SEAL 00005221 399579 7537343 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,248.75 SUPPORTS, BRACKETS 00005211 399457 7537344 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 377.00 GLASS LAMINATE 00005227 399580 7576846 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.50 WIPERS 00005231 399581 7583669 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,766.76 3043 4/28/2016 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 542.08 BRIDGE REPAIR 399793 002016000822 1346.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 542.08 3044 4/28/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 -- Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3044 4/28/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC Continued.. 1,015.77 MOWER PARTS 399458 E193907 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 337.31 SHAFTS, ROLLERS, BELT 00005185 399582 0138891 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,353.08 3045 4/28/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 127.50 399723 0150012-IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 127.50 3046 4/28/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 777.90 399613 423263-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 1,026.50 399612 423313-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,804.40 403618 4/28/2016 124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST 2,950.08 JANITORIAL SERVICE 399401 9335560 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,950.08 403619 4/28/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 114.78 GOLF BALLS 399646 902140156 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 453.99 GOLF BALLS 399645 902161898 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS-PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 117.72 GOLF BALLS 399644 902163918 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 117.72 GOLF BALLS 399647 902172477 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 117.72 GOLF BALLS 399648 902242280 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 921.93 403620 4/28/2016 135346 ADVANCED FILING CONCEPTS 126.00 UN1BIND SUPPLIES 399726 117640 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 126.00 403621 4/28/2016 135313 AIR CLIMATE CONTROL INC. 408.78 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 399643 46239 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 408.78 403622 4/28/2016 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. 13,071.12 W RD BIKE LANE EXTENSION 399727 56962 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 13,071.12 403623 4/28/2016 118491 APPLE INC. 705.00 IPAD REPLACEMENT 00004332 399402 4381553989 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 705.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 - Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403623 403624 4/28/2016 4/28/2016 118491 APPLE INC. 134924 ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. Continued... 353.05 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003710 399614 93721297 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 353.05 403625 4/28/2016 136206 ARSENEAULT, PAT 83.76 FOOD FOR HRRC DOR 399856 042516 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 83.76 403626 4/28/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,220.50 399485 3093818 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 984.00 399689 3095269 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,524.00 399795 3095270 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 774.00 399688 3095272 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 786.00 399796 3095273 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2.14- 399690 335588 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 18.28- 399691 343520 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 54.58- 399486 3435220 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,213.50 403627 4/28/2016 106304 ASPEN MILLS 459.30 399619 179374 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 482.30 399469 179384 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 474.30 399470 179386 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 460.30 399618 179388 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 482.30 399617 179392 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 464.30 399616 179394 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 459.30 UNIFORMS 00003780 399615 179395 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 460.30 399468 179399 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 460.30 399467 179400 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 449.30 399466 179401 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 460.30 399621 179403 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 470.30 399620 179404 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 470.30 399465 179405 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 470.15 UNIFORMS 00003778 399464 179406 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 314.78 399622 179581 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 327.68 399471 179583 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 7,165.51 403628 4/28/2016 133689 AUER STEEL R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 4 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 -- 4/28/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Page - 7 Business Unit 403628 4/28/2016 133689 AUER STEEL Continued.., 1,221.00 ROOM HEATER 00001838, 399650 5220834 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,221.00 403629 4/28/2016 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 285.00 399487 7432 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 325.00 399488 7494 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 482.00 399797 7610 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,092.00 403630 4/28/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 1,033.69 399800 292227 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 252.00 399799 292326 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,285.69 403631 4/28/2016 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 126.95 COFFEE 399729 T81038 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 126.95 403632 4/2812016 138239 BOEMER, RICHARD G. 1,541.60 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 399733 154265 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,541.60 403633 4/28/2016 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 142.94 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003714 399623 82121372 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 108.29 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003714 399624 82121373 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,725.66 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003714 399625 82122890 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,976.89 403634 4/28/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,150.50 399588 133222 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,470.50 399495 133237 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 300.50 399801 133321 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,921.50 403635 4/28/2016 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 125.00 ROOM RENTAL 399735 9554 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 125.00 403636 4/28/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 566.45 399496 1080459106 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 - 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403636 4/28/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 5,979.71 399592 1080460651 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 28.13 399591 1080460652 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,681.76 399589 1080460653 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 73.15 399590 1080460704 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,404.99 399695 1080460705 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 36.27 399597 1080460707 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,882.10 399596 1080460708 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,562.90 399595 1080460709 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 243.07 399593 1080460710 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 121.53 399594 1080460711 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 21.47 399802 1080461890 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 259.15 399693 1080461891 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 726.74 399694 1080461892 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 174.00- 399696 2080132436 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 16,413.42 403637 4/28/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 4,045.05 399803 1090550270 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 120.00 399804 1090550341 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,762.90 399497 1090550342 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,607.70 399498 1090550343 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 260.00 399499 1090550344 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,335.40 399501 1090551197 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 48.60 399500 1090551198 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,694.30 399697 1090553236 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14,873.95 403638 4/28/2016 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 119.24 GOLF GLOVES 399651 1002484611 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 95.40 GOLF GLOVES 399652 1002485302 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 71.55 GOLF GLOVES 399653 1002487009 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 286.19 403639 4/28/2016 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 400.29 399656 926705361 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 162.68 MERCHANDISE 399654 926719527 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 375.36 399655 926719579 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 121.25 399658 926741574 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 376.20 399657 926752064 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,435.78 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 — Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403639 4/28/2016 403640 4/28/2016 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES Continued... 30.80 399502 00011157 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,035.40 399503 880295 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,066.20 403641 4/28/2016 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 1,000.00 HOME ENERGY SQUAD 399736 13650 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 1,000.00 403642 4/28/2016 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 4,539.14 5563827-4 399841 5563827-4/16 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 980.14 8034001-1 399840 8034001-4/16 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5,519.28 403643 4/28/2016 132405 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 142.52 ED146979 PERMIT REFUND 399842 4246 CROCKER 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS AVE 142.52 403644 4128/2016 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 375.00 00169577 TRAINING 399627 00612477 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 375.00 403645 4/28/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 161.20 952 285-2951 399408 2951-4/16 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 62.77 952 944-6522 399472 6522-4/16 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 223.97 403646 4/28/2016 135835 CENTURYLINK 1,335.45 612-D08-2053-053 399409 2053-4/16 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 1,335.45 403647 4/28/2016 104283 CHISAGO COUNTY 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 399737 042216 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 403648 4/28/2016 133940 CIPOLLA, LAWRENCE 100.00 GARDENING SEMINARS 399533 041616 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 - 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403648 403649 4/28/2016 4/28/2016 133940 CIPOLLA, LAWRENCE 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Continued... 92.57 00082198-0200815001 399742 0200815001-4/16 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 995.31 00082050-0200650009 399411 200650009-4/16 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 52.21 00082050-0200650018 399410 200650018-4/16 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 81.72 00102561-0200862003 399525 200862003-4/16 5821.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 111.56 00102561-0203163003 399526 203163003-4/16 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY 25.27 00114064-0203163012 399740 203163012-4/16 1653.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 697.80 00101025-0203600013 399739 203600013-4/16 1653.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 32.42 00101025-0203610011 399738 203610011-4/16 1653.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 21.47 00114667-0210000012 399741 210000012-4/16 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 2,110.33 403650 4/28/2016 103141 CMI INC. 102.01 MOUTHPIECES 00003035 399743 821509 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 102.01 403651 4/28/2016 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 199.08 399504 0168539018 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 284.40 399805 0168541425 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 483.48 403652 4/28/2016 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 897.49 MAY 2016 MAINTENANCE 399412 M424-002073-4/1 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 6 897.49 403653 4/28/2016 120433 COMCAST 45.80 8772 10 614 0373022 399744 373022-4/16 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 25.98 8772 10 614 0496856 399659 496856-4/16 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 71.78 403654 4/28/2016 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 605.20 DOME ADVERTISING 399660 NW722674 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 510.00 DOME ADVERTISING 399661 NVV722675 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,115.20 403655 4/28/2016 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 176.07 UNIFORM SHIRTS 399745 46869 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 176.07 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 — 4/28/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403655 403656 4/28/2016 4/28/2016 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY Continued... 88.00 MAR 2016 WASHES 399413 444317 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 88.00 403657 4/28/2016 134475 D R HORTON INC 2,500.00 ED146220 DEMO PERMIT REFUND 399843 5621 CHOWEN AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 403658 4/28/2016 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 440.00 PUMP SUMP 399473 111512 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 440.00 403659 4/28/2016 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,769.95 MAY 2016 PREMIUMS 399747 F018342-5/16 9900.2033.16 LTD -99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,769.95 403660 4/28/2016 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 65.26- CREDIT 399415 84473 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,202.75 LUBE CART 00005218 399414 87205 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 144.70 VISE 00005170 399551 88693 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 89.75 TIE ROD SET 00005225 399552 89093 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.98- CREDIT 399553 89102 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,363.96 403661 4/28/2016 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 9,206.47 MAR 2016 SURCHARGE 399416 24771053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 9,206.47 403662 4/28/2016 138179 DH ATHLETICS LLC 1,166.20 BASES , 399417 16038 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,166.20 403663 4/28/2016 136484 DIEBEL, MIKE 92.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 399844 042016 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 92.00 403664 4/28/2016 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS 207.45 FLAGS 399662 0086688-IN 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 207.45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 - Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403664 4/28/2016 403665 4/28/2016 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS 104645 EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL Continued... 1.14 ART WORK SOLD 399637 041216 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1.14 403666 4/28/2016 101627 ELASKY, JEFF 48.51 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 399628 MEALS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.51 403667 4/28/2016 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 3,864.23 LIFT 6 PUMP REPAIR 00001631 399554 0057586-IN 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 3,864.23 403668 4/28/2016 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 739.19 VEHICLE BUILD-UP 399418 LG040516-1 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 739.20 VEHICLE BUILD-UP 399418 LG040516-1 421450.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ANIMAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT 1,478.39 403669 4/28/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 197.42 BATTERIES 399655 1-4965471 1653.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150.06 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, BRAKES 399420 69-219126 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.62 ANTIFREEZE 399419 69-219614 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 391.42 PLUGS, SHOCKS, END KITS 399557 69-219658 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.15 DIST CAP, ROTOR 399558 69-219882 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 283.89 RACK & PINION 399559 69-220087 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.10 ADHESIVE CLEANER, ROTORS 399556 69-220204 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.39 GARB CLEANER 399560 69-220216 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,383.05 403670 4/28/2016 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,280.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 399845 042016 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,280.00 403671 4/28/2016 100756 FEDEX 29.05 IPAD SHIPMENT 399421 6-599-01167 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 29.05 403672 4/28/2016 138219 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 107.78 ED144354 PERMIT REFUND 399422 6008 SAXONY RD 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 107.78 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 - Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403672 403673 4/28/2016 4/28/2016 138219 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 131188 FIRST-SHRED Continued... 21.80 399664 180503 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 399663 181942 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.60 403674 4/28/2016 108654 FLANDERS, SUSAN 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 399630 041216 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 403675 4128/2016 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 40.84 CARBURETOR REPAIR KIT 00005288 399561 74847600 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.84 403676 4/28/2016 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 623.55 399667 41114676 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 761.61 399666 41115872 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 827.01 APPAREL 399665 41116160 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,293.88 399668 41116757 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,506.05 403677 4/28/2016 101103 GRAINGER 106.49 BATTERIES 00002159 399751 9078357994 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 83.34 FLOODLIGHTS 00002159 399752 9079942208 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 31.10 BANDAGES, SPLINTER TOOL 00005148 399423 9080069975 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 18.59 SAFETY GLASSES 00005151 399424 9082376568 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 239.52 403678 4/28/2016 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 64.95 ALIGNMENT 399562 96327 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.95 403679 4/28/2016 120201 GRANICUS INC. 500.00 MAY 2016 SERVICES 399753 75612 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 690.00 MAY 2016 SERVICES 399753 75612 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,190.00 403680 4/28/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 426.75 399806 MN00003405 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 426.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 — Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403680 403681 4/28/2016 4/28/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 100785 GREUPNER, JOE Continued... 40.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 399846 042016 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 40.00 403682 4/28/2016 138241 GROWLER MAGAZINE, THE 818.66 BEER MAGAZINE ADS 399847 1464,1524,1598 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 818.67 BEER MAGAZINE ADS 399847 1464,1524,1598 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 818.67 BEER MAGAZINE ADS 399847 1464,1524,1598 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,456.00 403683 4/28/2016 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 1,004.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 399848 04206 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,004.00 403684 4/28/2016 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 1,802.37 TECO MOTOR 00001546 399425 155102-1 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,802.37 403685 4/28/2016 124162 HARMENING, LISA 7.21 UTILITY FINAL REFUND 399474 5229 HALIFAX 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 7.21 403686 4/28/2016 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,480.78 CHEMICALS 00005285 399426 3865811 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,480.78 403687 4/28/2016 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 843.98 MAY 2016 COBRA 399755 65357291 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 13,054.20 MAY 2016 PREMIUMS 399754 65372360 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 13,898.18 403688 4/28/2016 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 399475 43822 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 403689 4/28/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,357.70 MAR 2106 ROOM & BOARD 399756 1000075813 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 3,357.70 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 — Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403690 4/28/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Continued... 2,192.44 RADIO FEES - MAR 2016 399669 1000075387 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,192.44 403691 4/28/2016 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 1,218.48 LAPTOP 00004325 399427 57062907 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,218.48 403692 4/28/2016 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 251.48 FOAM SOAP 00002157 399759 602035050 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 116.07 FOAM SOAP 00002157 399760 602040541 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 367.55 403693 4/28/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,659.25 399809 821599 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,030.62 399807 821933 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 58.00 399808 821934 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,747.87 403694 4/28/2016 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 141.69 LIQUOR BROCHURES 399563 34289 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 141.70 LIQUOR BROCHURES 399563 34289 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 141.70 LIQUOR BROCHURES 399563 34289 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 215.94 PRINTED RACK CARDS 399429 34291 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 641.03 403695 4/28/2016 119857 ICMA 1,362.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 399476 190781 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 1,362.00 403696 4/28/2016 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 360.94 399762 608473668 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 360.94 403697 4/28/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 317.83 399506 38458 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 796.40 399505 38475 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 659.50 399810 38683 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,773.73 403698 4/28/2016 138240 INTERMEDIX R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page.. 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 - 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403698 4/28/2016 138240 INTERMEDIX Continued... 1,940.31 JAN-MAR 2016 BILLINGS 399763 INVADPI18306 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,940.31 403699 4/28/2016 121034 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING 70.00 ICSC SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 399430 B03595-2016 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 70.00 403700 4/28/2016 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 4.27 399631 033116 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4.27 403701 4/28/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 6,941.64 399812 2488776 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 96.35 399811 2488777 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 10,075.12 399700 2488783 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 57.60 399699 2488784 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 97.20 399701 2488785 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 280.80- 399702 2488786 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 16,987.11 403702 4/28/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 697.63 399509 5416862 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,860.42 399508 5416863 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 374.37 399507 5416865 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 86.58 399706 5422284 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 33.41 399706 5422285 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 429.64 399704 5422286 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 642.57 399703 5422288 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 334.64 399709 5422290 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 618.76 399818 5422291 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,310.35 399708 5422293 5842.6513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 478.21 399713 5422294 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 182.31 399712 5422296 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,397.34 399707 5422297 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,944.98 399711 5422298 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,669.16 399714 5422299 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 425.39 399710 5422300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 71.82 399815 5422304 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 436.64 399814 5422305 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,327.31 399820 5422306 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 -- 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403702 4/28/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 199.89 399813 5422307 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,888.89 399819 5422308 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \MNE VERNON SELLING 912.11 399816 5422309 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,295.04 399817 5422310 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.75- 399511 565025 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 76.23- 399821 565793 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 196.98- 399510 569839 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 21,329.50 403703 4/28/2016 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 269.55 CONDENSER MOTOR 00001801 399431 1043048 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 269.55 403704 4/28/2016 103230 JOHNSTON'S SALES & SERVICE 89.64 CORD, VACUUM BAGS, SERVICE 399565 13645 5861.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 89.64 403705 4/28/2016 136126 KADERLIK, NATE 9.97 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 399764 042216 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 9.97 403706 4/28/2016 100553 KEEHR, GREGORY 155.52 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 399849 042116 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 460.00 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 399849 042116 5860.6106 MEETING EXPENSE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 615.52 403707 4/28/2016 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 36.00 LOCK PARTS 00001836 399432 S1030244 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 36.00 403708 4/28/2016 100285 KLAPPERICK, TERRY 10.00 PARKING EXPENSE 399850 042016 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 10.00 403709 4/28/2016 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 201.60 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 399851 042016 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 201.60 403710 4/28/2016 138235 KOPILENKO, BORIS 48.29 UTILITY FINAL REFUND 399477 5229 MADDOX LA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 -- Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403710 4/28/2016 138235 KOPILENKO, BORIS Continued... 48.29 403711 4/28/2016 102587 KSTP-FM LLC 2,100.00 RADIO ADVERTISING 399765 8001580 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 2,100.00 403712 4/28/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 605.58 NUTS, WASHERS, BITS 00005217 399433 9304013906 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.59 TY-RAP 00001834 399434 9304023841 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 657.17 403713 4/28/2016 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 20,225.20 LEAGAL FEES 399435 MAR2016 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 20,225.20 403714 4/28/2016 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 663.99 PAID CLAIM 399766 15210 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 663.99 403715 4/28/2016 116575 LIFELINE INC. 1,416.00 AED CLASSES 399436 LL-7323 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,416.00 403716 4/28/2016 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12,241.38 UNLEADED FUEL 00005182 399437 330558 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.00- FEB 2016 REFUND 399438 MBINV/00075106 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 199.95- MAR 2016 REFUND 399439 MBINV/00075150 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11,901.43 403717 4/28/2016 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 875.00 APR 14 ST. PAUL TRIP 399567 041916 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 875.00 403718 4/28/2016 138236 METRO TRANSIT 262.50 3 BAGS BUS TOKENS 399568 042016 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 262.50 403719 4/28/2016 138058 MILLER, JAKE 86.45 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 399569 042016 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 86.45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 — Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403719 4/28/2016 403720 4/28/2016 138058 MILLER, JAKE 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER Continued... 120.00 TELEVISED SEWER 399440 35182 03494.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Golf Terrace B 120.00 403721 4/28/2016 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 100.00 IMPARED DRIVING CLASS 399441 200000472 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 403722 4/28/2016 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 399852 NATE BEHLEN 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 403723 4/28/2016 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 45.00 LICENSE FEE - CHET BOOM 399442 RENEWAL 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 45.00 403724 4/28/2016 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 195.00 FABRICATION 00005222 399444 0114036-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 217.06 FLOJET SWTCH 00001824 399443 0114037-IN 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 412.06 403725 4/28/2016 138171 MOBOTREX 1,020.00 LED LAMPS 00001671 399673 211815 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,020.00 403726 4/28/2016 121491 1VIORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 305.26 WHEEL ASSEMBLIES 00005292 399570 540897F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 305.26 403727 4/28/2016 120024 MULCAHY COMPANY INC. 324.00 HEAT PUMP FOR CAR WASH 00001805 399445 305233 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 416.82 GLYCOL 00001848 399769 305745 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 740.82 403728 4/28/2016 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 1,913.51 REPLACE OUTDOOR LIGHTING 399676 115975 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RANGE 183.60 TROUBLESHOOT 399675 116078 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RANGE 2,097.11 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 - Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403729 4/28/2016 104078 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES Continued... 3,813.00 2016 ANNUAL DUES 399446 117585 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 3,813.00 403730 4/28/2016 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 380.50 399598 109388 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 380.50 403731 4/28/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 100.00 LIGHTING 399770 95687 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 100.00 403732 4/28/2016 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 280.35 LIGHTING 00005287 399447 41011 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 280.35 403733 4/28/2016 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 93.56 RECORDER REPAIR 399634 IN65806 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 93.56 403734 4/28/2016 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 25.65 399635 W16030662 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.65 399635 W16030662 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.30 399635 W16030662 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 76.95 399635 W16030662 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 76.95 399635 W16030662 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 179.55 399635 W16030662 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 282.15 399635 W16030662 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 51.30 399635 W16030662 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 25.65 399635 W16030662 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 102.60 399635 W16030662 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 115.42 399635 W16030662 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 115.43 399635 W16030662 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 51.30 399635 W16030662 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 76.95 399635 W16030662 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 76.95 399635 W16030662 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 51.30 399635 W16030662 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 271.14 399636 W16030667 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 45.56 LANGUAGE LINE 399677 W16030749 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,701.80 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 - 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403735 4/28/2016 102265 OLSON, TIM Continued.. 79.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 399771 042116 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.98 403736 4/28/2016 101659 ORKIN 130.00 PEST CONTROL 399772 12557623-4/16 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 130.00 403737 4/28/2016 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 4,065.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002531 399448 3866 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 4,065.00 403738 4/28/2016 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 5.60 PARKING 399478 REFUND 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE 5.60 403739 4/28/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 89.25 399601 8543649-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 88.25- 399602 8543912-CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,572.17 399599 8544467-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 1,445.16 399600 8544475-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 336.50 399715 8544476-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,354.83 403740 4/28/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 509.80 399512 53942536 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 509.80 403741 4/28/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 9.54- 399831 235288 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7.23- 399832 235289 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15.38- 399833 235290 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.16 399515 2945412 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 325.87 399513 2959936 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,399.11 399514 2959938 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 50TH ST SELLING 97.28 399829 2963617 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE VERNON SELLING 204.16 399717 2963619 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 54.16 399716 2963621 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 37.16 399721 2963623 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .20 399828 2963624 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 508.88 399720 2963626 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 - 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403741 4/28/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 1,379.25 399719 2963627 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 73.16 399718 2963629 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,076.40 399827 2963632 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 639.96 399826 2963633 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,814.08 399830 2963634 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 146.32 399825 2963635 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,725.00 403742 4/28/2016 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 399773 336120 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 120.00 POTTING SOIL 399774 336215 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,343.86 403743 4/28/2016 101014 PRO MEDIA-STREFF MARKETING GROUP 428.79 MEETING ITEMS 399775 229222 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 428.79 403744 4/28/2016 119507 PUKKA INC. 132.00 VISORS 399678 BU00839-IN 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 132.00 403745 4/28/2016 125936 REINDERS INC, 519.38 FERTILIZER 00002016 399782 3036305-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,984.62 FERTILIZER 00002016 399781 3036563-00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,504.00 403746 4/28/2016 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 241.94 BRAKE CONTROLS 00005223 399449 1927740629 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.97 JACK 00005184 399573 1927742028 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275.91 403747 4/28/2016 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH 13.00 PARKING EXPENSE 399853 042016 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 13.00 403748 4/28/2016 138242 ROEDEL, KATHRYN 507.70 REQUEST REFUND 399854 4602 SUNNYSIDE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 507.70 403749 4/28/2016 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 — 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403749 4/28/2016 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN Continued... 118.09 ITEMS FOR CONFERENCE 399783 REIMBURSE 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 118.09 403750 4/28/2016 102716 RON'S MECHANICAL 97.15 ED146315 PERMIT REFUND 399679 7012 VVESTON CIR 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 97.15 403751 4/28/2016 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 181.99 BRAKE CLEANER 399450 69758116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 181.99 403752 4/28/2016 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 617.16 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 399451 8104241356 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 617.16 403753 4/28/2016 100995 SEH 3,140.16 BRAEMAR WETLANDS 399452 312927 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 715.76 BRAEMAR WETLAND MONITORING 399787 312930 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 2,330.53 54TH ST BID DOCS 399786 313306 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 9,468.42 ARDEN PARK BIDS & DOCS 399784 313307 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 6,314.37 NEIGHBORHOOD ROAD RECON 399785 313309 01422.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN MORNINGSIDE A RECON 2,292.75 NEIGHBORHOOD ROAD RECON 399785 313309 01438.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN White Oaks C Recon 3,235.42 NEIGHBORHOOD ROAD RECON 399785 313309 03492.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Morningside A & White Oaks C 3,654.76 NEIGHBORHOOD ROAD RECON 399785 313309 05553.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Prospect Knolls B Reconstructi 2,712.10 NEIGHBORHOOD ROAD RECON 399785 313309 04416.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Morningside A & White Oaks C 33,864.27 403754 4/28/2016 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 837.50 APR 2016 ADMIN FEES 399788 008816-4/16 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 837.50 403755 4/28/2016 101201 SIEMS, JEFFREY 11.00 CLASS B LICENSE 399638 REIMBURSEMENT 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 190.92 MNIAAI CONFERENCE LODGING 399638 REIMBURSEMENT 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 201.92 403756 4/28/2016 120784 SIGN PRO 150.00 SPONSOR AD DIVIDER PANELS 399789 10278 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 450.00 SPONSOR AD DIVIDER PANELS 399789 10278 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 50.00 SPONSOR AD DIVIDER PANELS 399789 10278 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 - 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403756 4/28/2016 120784 SIGN PRO Continued_ 50.00 SPONSOR AD DIVIDER PANELS 399789 10278 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 50.00 SPONSOR AD DIVIDER PANELS 399789 10278 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 97.68 TASTE OF EDINA POSTERS 399574 10303 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 97.68 TASTE OF EDINA POSTERS 399574 10303 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 945.36 403757 4/28/2016 102119 SIWEK LUMBER & MILLWORK INC 707.00 LUMBER FOR TRAILER DECK 399575 02-176403-00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 707.00 403758 4/28/2016 132195 SMALL LOT MN 104.04 399603 6138 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 104.04 403759 4/28/2016 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTERY 240.47 CARPET CLEANING 399576 1351C 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 240.47 CARPET CLEANING 399577 1352C 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 480.94 403760 4/28/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 189.80 399520 042016 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.00 399516 1393985 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 838.62 399722 1398829 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 95.87 399605 1398831 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 909.67 399608 1398832 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 141.60 399606 1398833 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,173.02 399604 1398834 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,448.20 399607 1398835 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,391.67 399609 1398837 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 83.40 399517 1398838 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,296.51 399519 1398839 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.66 399518 1398840 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 445.60 399610 1398841 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11,078.62 403761 4/28/2016 110977 SOW, ADAMA 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 399639 042016 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 403762 4/28/2016 134700 SPOK INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 -- Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403762 4/28/2016 134700 SPOK INC. Continued... 107.40 PAGERS -APR 2016 399453 Z0319246D 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 107.40 403763 4/28/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 163.75 399834 10513 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 163.75 403764 4/28/2016 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 77.00 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005145 399454 10138679 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.75 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005147 399578 10138753 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.75 403765 4/28/2016 121681 SUMMIT 455.00 LEAKING PIPE REPAIR 399790 2104183 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 455.00 403766 4/28/2016 117869 SUNICE USA INC. 56.45 CAR COAT 399680 1192724 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 56.45 403767 4/28/2016 136376 SUPPLYVVORKS 63.31 DISINFECTANT SPRAY 399791 363820119 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 63.31 403768 4/28/2016 136776 SYMBOL ARTS 345.00 CITY OF EDINA CLOVER COINS 399455 0254863-IN 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 345.00 403769 4/28/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 401.17 CONCESSION PRODUCT 399792 604191205 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 401.17 403770 4/28/2016 104932 TAYLOR MADE 116.23 WEDGE 399681 31543904 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 116.23 WEDGE 399682 31559777 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 232.46 403771 4/28/2016 102471 THOLEN, BRIAN 50.36 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 399640 MEALS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.36 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 — Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403771 403772 4/28/2016 4/28/2016 102471 THOLEN, BRIAN 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY Continued-. 4,288.10 399835 1068716 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 117.95 399836 1071234 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,406.05 403773 4/28/2016 128347 TKO WINES INC. 1,440.00 399611 3218 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 720.00 399837 3234 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,160.00 403774 4/28/2016 120595 T-MOBILE 34.04 399456 032716 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 34.04 403775 4/28/2016 127543 TSI INCORPORATED 15,420.85 SCBA FIT TEST MACHINE 00003783 399479 90794076 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 15,420.85 403776 4/28/2016 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 2,287.48 LEAGUE SOFTBALLS 399480 150-0020984-01 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 2,287.48 403777 4/28/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO, 604.39 LIQUOR BAGS 399583 383478-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 212.05 TOWELS, TISSUE, UTENSILS 399584 383479-00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 346.55 LIQUOR BAGS 399585 384127-00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 63.89 PLASTIC CUTLERY, ROLL TOWELS 399586 384129-00 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,226.88 403778 4/28/2016 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 44.91 CABLE, NUT 00006487 399683 415160004 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 44.91 403779 4/28/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 91.78 REMODEL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001736 399459 1297354 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 83.00 LIGHTING 00001822 399684 1317556 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 174.78 403780 4/28/2016 137833 VIKING TROPHIES AWARDS & RECONGNITION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/28/2016 - 4/28/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403780 4/28/2016 137833 VIKING TROPHIES AWARDS & RECONGNITION Continued.. 66.38 PLAQUES 399641 125100 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 66.38 403781 4/28/2016 103410 W.W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC. 1,430.00 POOL PUMP INSPECTIONS 399794 96154 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,430.00 403782 4/28/2016 138234 WALKER, SEAN 65.86 UTILITY FINAL REFUND 399460 5312 KELLOGG 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 65.86 403783 4/28/2016 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 52.53 399461 18227 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 72.30 399461 18227 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 101.15 399461 18227 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 167.66 399461 18227 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 266.76 399461 18227 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 528.57 399461 18227 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 528.57 399461 18227 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 71.08 399461 18227 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 77.28 399461 18227 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 168.36 399461 18227 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 184.53 399461 18227 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 1,283.21 399461 18227 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,336.95 399461 18227 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 87.23 399461 18227 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 136.04 399461 18227 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 5,062.22 403784 4/28/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,510.60 399521 7077018 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 720.00 399522 7077096 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 103.56 399725 7078047 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,752.54 399724 7078051 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,945.40 399838 7078053 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 7,032.10 403785 4/28/2016 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 1,376.28 FUNGICIDE 00006485 399685 60720743 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:07 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/28/2016 — Inv No 4/28/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403785 403786 4/28/2016 4/28/2016 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 1,376.28 4,719.05 51-6824328-7 399686 496371343 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 22.50 51-4151897-6 399482 497623615 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.10 51-7567037-0 399481 497669325 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 84.79 5 1-001 0025256-3 399463 497704823 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 15.25 5 1-00 10613106-9 399462 497714957 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 6,748.69 51-0837548-4 399483 497751987 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 11,625.38 403787 4/28/2016 138243 YOUNG, JODI 82.92 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 399855 5104 DUGGAN PL 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 82.92 403788 4/28/2016 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 1,281.50 399839 16788 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,281.50 403789 4/28/2016 101091 ZIEGLER INC 173.35 HOSE ASSEMBLY 00005149 399587 PC001767612 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.35 499,026.80 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks NP ACH Payment Total Payments 388,266.33 110,760.47 499,026.80 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 4/26/2016 10:41:20 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 4/28/2016 - 4/28/2016 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 144,876.43 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,437.46 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 37,288.32 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,292.75 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 19,830.74 05100 ART CENTER FUND 169.02 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 6,207.60 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 3,555.65 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 28,960.48 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 2,879.37 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 8,437.06 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,619.43 05800 LIQUOR FUND 146,710.74 05900 UTILITY FUND 58,373.09 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,427.86 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 14,562.17 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 557.56 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 13,071.12 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,769.95 Report Totals 499,026.80 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pplicies and procedures date Y/ 2- gj R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3047 5/5/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 88.00 399857 1994494 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.20 400191 1996182 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 155.20 3048 5/5/2016 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 120.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 400100 145153 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 120.00 3049 5/5/2016 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 661.00 STORMWATER MGMT 400077 23270354.00-222 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 702.00 STORMWATER MGMT 400077 23270354.00-222 04418.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Strachauer Park A 1,363.00 3060 5/5/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,610.05 399861 53262900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 237.10 399860 53263000 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 233.70 400194 53375000 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 525.75 400193 53375200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE YORK SELLING 71.67 399865 93805600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 53.24 399864 93805700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 28.12 399863 93805800 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 74.34 399862 93805900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,833.97 3051 5/5/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 86.40 FILE BOXES 400115 0E-420011-1 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 896.11 OFFICE FURNITURE 400113 0E-QT031249-1 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 85.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 400112 WO-192028-1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 193.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003040 399907 WO-194092-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 399906 WO-194916-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 70.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 399955 WO-195112-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 71.97 CD/DVD LABELS 00003043 400116 WO-195441-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 400114 WO-195558-1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,532.76 3052 5/5/2016 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 2,342.00 DOOR REPAIRS 400117 S92380 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,342.00 3053 5/5/2016 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 2 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3053 5/5/2016 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Continued... 56.72 MOULDING, RETAINERS 00005100 399908 1039532 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 115.09 ELEMENT 00005109 399909 1042505 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 415.79 TUBE ASSEMBLY, ROD ASSEMBLY 00005115 399910 1045143 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 587.60 3054 5/5/2016 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 575.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES 400124 518977 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 575.00 3055 5/5/2016 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 48.60 BOARD MEETING MEALS 400259 TRI CITY 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 48.60 3056 5/5/2016 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 986.93 JANITORIAL SERVICES 400126 7070224322 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 986.93 3057 5/5/2016 129157 DO-GOOD.BIZ INC 640.61 POSTCARD MAILING 400263 POSTAGE 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 640.61 3058 5/5/2016 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 288.00 CARAMEL CORN 400130 2128 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 288.00 3059 5/5/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 155.25 AD FOR BID 400133 333711 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 355.00 EDINAARTS CENTER AD 400132 334457 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 99.00 BOARD OF REVIEW NOTICE 400137 336407 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 46.00 PUBLISH NOTICE 400136 336408 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 149.50 PUBLISH ORD 2016-03 400135 336409 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 299.00 PUBLISH ORD 2016-04 400134 336410 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 355.00 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 400131 337275 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 34.50 PUBLISH NOTICE 400138 339053 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 46.00 PUBLISH NOTICE 400139 339054 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,539.25 3060 5/5/2016 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 193.96 AD FOR BID 400144 742699150 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 193.96 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 — Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3060 5/5/2016 3061 5/5/2016 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC Continued... 1,658.01 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 400147 51147 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,658.01 3062 5/5/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 5,380.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002555 400083 14418 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 5,380.00 3063 5/5/2016 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 953.26 LIQUOR LIABILITY 400151 259004 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 953.26 3064 5/5/2016 129508 IMPACT 2,201.12 MAILAPR 2016 BILLS 400019 112995 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING-FINANCE 2,201.12 3065 5/5/2016 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 352.69 CHEMICAL FEED EQUIP 00001779 399961 987179 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 278.34 CHEMICAL FEED EQUIP 00001699 399960 994745 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 631.03 3066 5/5/2016 101483 MENARDS 25.96 TUBS 00001871 399964 11555 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 33.70 GLOVES, LUMBER, DUCT CAP 00001874 400159 11608 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 41.89 ROOF LEAK MATERIALS 00001897 400020 11949 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 185.20 LUMBER, RAFTER TIES 00001556 400086 8542 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 286.75 3067 5/5/2016 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 651.00 VANE COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 400087 2299 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC 651.00 3068 5/5/2016 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE 658.75 MAY 2016 SERVICES 399932 3952 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 658.75 3069 5/5/2016 130141 OENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 447.30 400220 4678 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 447.30 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3069 5/5/2016 130141 OENO DISTRIBUTION LLC Continued... 3070 5/5/2016 129485 PAPCO INC. 268.60 CLEANING SUPPLIES 400167 98469 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 268.60 3071 5/5/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 289.70 TIRES 00005122 399972 210225666 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 289.70 3072 5/5/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 503.69 CLEANING SUPPLIES 400170 9175 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 652.36 TISSUE, LINERS, TOWELS 00002333 400022 9176 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,156.05 3073 5/5/2016 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 63.74 BLADE SHARPENING 400172 0059669-IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 63.74 3074 5/5/2016 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 1,273.75 SHOWER REPAIRS 400173 68150 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,273.75 3075 5/5/2016 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 108.50 BUSINESS CARDS 399938 90259 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 48.50 BUSINESS CARDS 399939 90344 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 157.00 3076 5/5/2016 104672 SPRINT 16.80 400179 873184124 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.80 400179 873184124 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 44.40 400179 873184124 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 49.30 400179 873184124 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 78.74 400179 873184124 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.98 400179 873184124 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 129.20 400179 873184124 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 139.40 400179 873184124 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 16.83 400179 873184124 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 95.39 400179 873184124 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.80 400179 873184124 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 16.81 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 5 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3076 5/5/2016 104672 SPRINT Continued... 16.81 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.43 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 49.31 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 79.98 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 95.60 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 203.67 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 247.67 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 16.90 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 215.66 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.81 ACCT 873184124 400073 FEB-MAR 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,687.29 3077 6/5/2016 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 52.41 GASKETS 00001861 399975 S3246926.001 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 52.41 3078 5/5/2016 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 193.74 SENSOR 00005229 399943 156491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.11 PEDAL 00005235 400094 157495 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 264.85 3079 5/5/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 211.36 ROD ENDS 399946 894429 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 170.10 BALL JOINT, TIE ROD END 00005289 400095 E194540 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 484.16 PUMP, TENSIONER, BELT 00005289 399948 0138887 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.89 SCREEN 00005185 399947 0138891A 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 968.51 3080 5/5/2016 119464 VINOCOPIA 122.50- 400061 0147781-CM 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 415.25- 400057 0148320-CM 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 455.50 400056 0148320-1N 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 127.50 400058 0150010-IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 664.75 399899 0150011-1N 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,173.50 399898 0150013-1N 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 372.50 400228 0150514-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 412.50 400059 0150519-1N 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 132.00 400060 0150521-1N 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,800.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3081 5/5/2016 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION Continued... 263.40 CONCESSION PRODUCT 400185 45300106 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 862.13 400186 45359521 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 84.87 400187 45367323 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,210.40 3082 5/5/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,171.80 399900 423312-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 857.20 400015 423901-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,164.50 400062 423903-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 3,193.50 403790 5/5/2016 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 525.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 400238 042116 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 525.00 403791 5/5/2016 116908 ACCENT 945.28 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 400239 15314 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 945.28 403792 5/5/2016 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES 210.00 TAILGATE 00005033 400240 36887 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 210.00 403793 5/5/2016 129458 ACME TOOLS 490.70 TOOLS 400097 4051100 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 173.98 CIRCULAR SAW, NAILS 00001802 399952 4077962 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 396.00 IMPACT WRENCH, VISE, AUGER BIT00001870 399954 4105228 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 380.15 ORBITAL SANDER, STAPLER 00001875 399953 4106905 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 356.46 TOOLS/GAS TANK FOR GEN 00001829 400098 4118115 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,797.29 403794 5/5/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 117.72 GOLF BALLS 400243 902302100 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 117.72 GOLF BALLS 400242 902313223 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 92.38 HATS 400247 902342276 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 235.44 GOLF BALLS 400241 902344696 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 117.72 GOLF BALLS 400245 902386776 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 114.78 GOLF BALLS 400244 902409501 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 117.72 GOLF BALLS 400246 902409559 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 913.48 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 5/5/2016 - Doc No Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403794 5/5/2016 403795 5/5/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES Continued... 98.97 ALARM MONITORING 400099 584998343 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 98.97 403796 5/5/2016 102164 ALOE UP SUNCARE PRODUCTS 124.80 SUNSCREEN 400248 192852 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 124.80 403797 5/5/2016 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 304.48 PAPER 400101 10471585-00 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 304.48 403798 5/5/2016 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN 19.00 CLASS A LICENSE 400249 042716 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 19.00 403799 5/5/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 955.00 399858 3095271 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,534.00 400192 3096649 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,489.00 403800 5/5/2016 106304 ASPEN MILLS 453.30 UNIFORMS 00003780 400102 180115 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 391.45 00003790 400103 180116 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 463.30 00003776 400104 180117 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 392.45 00003790 400105 180119 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 382.45 00003790 400106 180120 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 453.30 00003776 400107 180121 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 75.85 00003777 400108 180123 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,612.10 403801 5/5/2016 133689 AUER STEEL 610.00 FURNACE - LEWIS PK 00001812 399904 5219229 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 610.00 403802 5/5/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 35.94 BATTERIES 00003044 400109 018-402537 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.94 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary - Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403803 5/5/2016 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC Continued... 294.50 399859 7493 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 294.50 403804 5/5/2016 101343 BEHR, JASON 1,200.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 400250 042916 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,200.00 403805 5/5/2016 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 38.21 DI PLAYER PHOTOS 399905 REIMBURSE 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 38.21 403806 5/5/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 128.70 400110 292219 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 20.00 400195 293629 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 93.36- 400196 293630 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 881.15 400197 293631 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,051.40 399994 293632 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 160.00- 399995 293633 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,827.89 403807 5/5/2016 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 35.50 COFFEE 400111 T183306 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 35.50 403808 5/5/2016 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 13.23 REIMBURSEMENT 400251 042816 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 13.23 403809 5/5/2016 135784 BLAKE, PATRICIA 45.00 CLASS SUPPLIES 400252 1-0047238 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 45.00 CLASS SUPPLIES 400253 1-0047240 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 90.00 403810 5/5/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 348.50 399867 133353 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 386.50 399868 133394 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 850.50 399866 133399 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1MNE VERNON SELLING 508.75 399996 133462 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 834.50 400198 133494 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,928.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403810 5/5/2016 403811 5/5/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 138275 BRAEMAR FIGURE SKATING CLUB Continued... 150.00 BRAEMAR PROGRAM ADVERTISING 400254 EDINAART 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTER 150.00 403812 5/5/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,076.00 399869 1080460706 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,237.79 400025 1080463641 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 65.01 400024 1080463642 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 940.06 400026 1080463724 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 183.45 400027 1080463726 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 183.01 400199 1080463730 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,057.87 400028 1080463732 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 186.14 399998 1080463745 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 135.24 399999 1080463746 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,741.44 399997 1080463748 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,431.10 400001 1080463749 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,400.12 400000 1080463750 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE YORK SELLING 29.98- 400030 2080132440 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 28.90- 400029 2080132444 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 13,578.35 403813 5/5/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 4,982.40 399870 1090553233 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,236.89 399872 1090553234 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 23.80 399871 1090553235 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,458.60 400002 1090554171 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,581.65 400255 1090556233 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,283.34 403814 5/5/2016 137991 BRUSKE PRODUCTS 378.71 BRUSH FOR TENNANT 00005022 399911 8304 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 378.71 403815 5/5/2016 122074 BUIE, BARB 44.39 400017 PETTY CASH 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 58.00 400017 PETTY CASH 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 107.19 400017 PETTY CASH 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 209.58 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403815 403816 5/5/2016 5/5/2016 122074 BUIE, BARB 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING Continued... 257.38 FELLOW PHOTO 399912 020007157 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 257.38 403817 5/5/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 30.80 400003 00011162 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 582.20 399873 880294 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 538.55 400031 886545 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,058.05 400004 886546 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,209.60 403818 5/5/2016 131095 CARDWELL, LINDA 22.00 AARP CLASS REFUND 400256 042116 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 403819 5/5/2016 129923 CAWLEY 27.38 NAME BADGES 400118 V368866 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 27.38 403820 5/5/2016 102496 GEMSTONE CONTRACTOR SUPPLY 1,012.85 SEALER, SPRAYER, SCREED 00001806 400078 261120 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1,012.85 403821 5/5/2016 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 57.18 10089900-4 399913 10089900-4/16 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,361.85 5546504-1 399957 5546504-4/16 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 90.87 5584310-6 400233 5584310-4/16 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 54.58 5590919-6 400232 5590919-4/16 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 3,044.39 5591458-4 399956 5591458-4/16 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 115.37 5596524-8 400231 5596524-4/16 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,724.24 403822 5/5/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 54.73 952 920-1565 400120 1565-4/16 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.06 952 920-1586 400121 1586-4/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 79.70 952 922-2444 400119 2444-4/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 59.06 952 920-8632 400257 8632-4/16 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 252.55 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 -- 5/5/2016 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 11 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403823 5/5/2016 138261 CHEMAQUA Continued... 2,758.63 BRINE TREATMENT 400122 2276066 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 2,758.63 403824 5/5/2016 100683 CHEMSEARCH 666.08 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 400123 2273313 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 666.08 403825 5/5/2016 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 400.00 ABOUT TOWN ADS 400064 COM-0832 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 400.00 ABOUT TOWN ADS 400064 COM-0832 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 400.00 ABOUT TOVVN ADS 400064 COM-0832 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,368.75 POINT OF SALE COMPUTER ' 400125 COM-0880 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 3,568.75 403826 5/5/2016 100037 CITY OF MINNETONKA 2,590.00 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 400258 TRAINING COURSE 7401.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PSTF REVENUE 2,590.00 403827 5/5/2016 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 192.76 399874 0148068409 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 192.76 403828 5/5/2016 120433 COMCAST 142.75 CABLE 400127 540372-4/16 5553.6188 TELEPHONE SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 142.75 403829 5/5/2016 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 1,028.29 PATCH MIX 400260 041516 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,028.29 403830 5/5/2016 127913 CUTTER SALES 16.12 SEALS 399914 109103 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.12 403831 5/5/2016 137647 DEVRIES, RACHEL 96.20 REIMBURSEMENT 400261 042816 5761.6556 TOOLS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 76.00 PLANTS 400262 050216 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 172.20 403832 5/5/2016 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403832 5/5/2016 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. Continued... 27.00 650487671 400128 650487671-4/16 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 27.00 403833 5/5/2016 121103 DIRECTV 90.82 400129 28285812956 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 90.82 403834 5/5/2016 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 4,298.63 CHECK VALVE 00001777 399915 0057634-IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 4,298.63 403835 5/5/2016 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 635.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003748 400140 1818970 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 635.90 403836 5/5/2016 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 165.87 400005 5539 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 165.87 403837 5/5/2016 138265 ERANGE INC. 27.48 PLCC EXTRACTOR TOOL 400141 101876 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 27.48 403838 6/5/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 127.03 PAD KITS 399917 1-4966501 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.08 PARTS 399916 1-4968026 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 87.28 BATTERY 399919 69-220015 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 164.60 ROTORS 399918 69-220212 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.94 PARTS 399920 69-220734 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 316.45 FILTER, GASKET 400079 69-220748 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.47 BATTERY 400080 69-221125 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 304.71 MODULE 400081 69-221190 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,137.56 403839 5/5/2016 122549 FARNER-BOCKEN COMPANY 541.26 CONCESSION PRODUCT 400142 4768996 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 541.26 403840 5/5/2016 100756 FEDEX 19.17 IPAD SHIPMENT 400264 6-601-48654 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403840 5/5/2016 100756 FEDEX Continued... 19.17 403841 5/5/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 386.00 LOCATE PAINT, APPLICATOR 00001873 399958 0187491 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 68.49 GASKETS 00001781 400143 0188043 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 454.49 403842 5/5/2016 132866 FLAGSHIP RECREATION LLC 679.20 PLAYGROUND PARTS 00001593 400145 F4310 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 679.20 403843 5/5/2016 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 131.81 CARBURETOR ASSEMBLY 00005296 400082 74875500 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 131.81 403844 5/5/2016 100764 G & K SERVICES 229.62 ACCT 0039263 400146 1013660958 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 229.62 403845 5/5/2016 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 672.00 HATS 400265 41121487 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 672.00 403846 5/5/2016 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 477.00 VEHICLE GRAPHICS 400075 107138 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 477.00 VEHICLE GRAPHICS 400075 107138 421450.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ANIMAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT 73.00 UNIT 248 GRAPHICS 400076 107139 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,027.00 403847 5/5/2016 101103 GRAINGER 306.68 V-BELTS, GREASE GUN 00008071 400148 9076928721 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 42.48 ANTI-SLIP TAPE 00005183 399923 9083134578 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 246.00 LEAK MAT 00005183 399922 9084310581 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.75 HARD HAT 400149 9085261726 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 79.04 HARD HATS 400150 9085299478 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 17.82 SAFETY GLASSES 00005154 399924 9087890258 1301,6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19.58 SAFETY GLASSES 00005312 399959 9090237000 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 724.35 403848 5/5/2016 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL R55CKR2 LOGISIOI CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403848 5/5/2016 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL Continued... 64.95 ALIGNMENT 399921 96378 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.95 403849 5/5/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 364.50 399875 MN00003404 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE 50TH ST SELLING 491.25 400032 MN00003675 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,150.75 400006 MN00003676 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,006.50 403850 5/5/2016 121133 HAMERNICK DECORATING 428.30 STAIN SEAL & VARNISH 400266 1MNDOWVALANCES 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 428.30 403851 5/5/2016 138245 HASCHKA, C. 77.30 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 400018 5408 MALIBU DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 77.30 403852 5/5/2016 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 1,975.00 EMT REFRESHER COURSES 400065 43868 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,975.00 403853 5/5/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 530.00 ROOM AND BOARD 400267 1000068304 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 530.00 403854 5/5/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,170.54 RADIO FLEET FEES 400268 1000073993 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,170.54 RADIO FLEET FEES 400269 1000075440 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,341.08 403855 5/5/2016 131578 HEYMER, KATIE 60.00 COURSE REIMBURSEMENT 400270 INSTRUCTOR CERT 7414.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 60.00 403856 5/5/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 58.00 399876 821346 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,722.00 399877 821564 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 841.75 400033 822887 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,302.00 400007 823217 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 171.00 400271 823779 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 15 Business Unit 403856 5/5/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 4,094.75 403857 5/5/2016 138246 HOLTEN, TOLMAN 1,627.70 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 400066 154618 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,627.70 403858 5/5/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 408.40 399878 38732 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 251.00 400034 38935 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 659.40 403859 5/5/2016 119808 INTEGRA 27.74 ISP BUNDLE 400152 13805129 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 27.74 403860 5/5/2016 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 23.00 LICENSE REIMBURSEMENT 400272 042816 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 403861 5/5/2016 100823 J & F REDDY RENTS INC. 174.66 RENT 2 FANS 400153 393543 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 174.66 403862 5/5/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,355.85 399879 2488778 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 17.55 399880 2488779 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 7,048.18 400203 2489176 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 116.65 400201 2489177 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 39.05 400200 2510802 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,130.00 400035 2510806 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 200.00 400036 2510808 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 166.00 400202 2510813 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,073.28 403863 5/5/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 66.67 399885 5401186 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,189.19 399881 5422283 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 652.04 399882 5422287 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 899.51 399883 5422289 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 50TH ST SELLING 38.41 399884 5422295 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO4 Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403863 5/5/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 55.71 400204 5427694 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 111.42 400217 5427695 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 201.82 400037 5427698 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 400205 5427700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 591.61 400038 5427702 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 220.37 400039 5427705 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,762.58 400206 5427708 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 938.94 400215 5427709 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 378.48 400214 5427710 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,706.53 400213 5427711 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,268.33 400207 5427713 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 887.91 400212 5427714 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 580.72 400208 5427715 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,052.80 400209 5427716 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 939.01 400211 5427717 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 38.41 400210 5427718 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,759.79 400041 5427722 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,791.31 400218 5427724 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 527.69 400042 5427725 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,962.15 400219 5427726 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,763.92 400216 5427729 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 128.00 400040 5427730 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 375.64 400043 5427731 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 16.16- 399886 560192 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 31,873.96 403864 5/5/2016 138278 JUST 4 GOLF ACCESSORIES LLC 161.28 HEAD COVERS 400273 9641 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 161.28 403865 5/5/2016 111018 KEEPRS INC. 400.00 GUN SUPPLIES 399925 299701-01 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 400.00 403866 5/5/2016 138279 KFT FIRE TRAINER LLC 4,275.99 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 400274 160.00000858 7413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF FIRE TOWER 4,275.99 403867 5/5/2016 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC. 377.60 ALLEY ROCK 400154 251966 1301.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 — Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403867 5/5/2016 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC. Continued... 377.60 403868 5/5/2016 130472 KW SPECIALTY SERVICES LLC 649.52 INSULATE PIPE, DUCT REPAIRS 00001421 399926 2445 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,624.35 MECHANICAL INSULATION REPAIRS30001422 399927 2446 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,273.87 403869 5/5/2016 100849 LAKELAND ENGINEERING 1,915.20 SOLENOID VALVES 00001808 400084 12296120-01 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,915.20 403870 5/5/2016 138280 LAURSEN PIANO SERVICE 95.00 PIANO TUNING 400275 050216 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 95.00 403871 5/5/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 603.80 DRILL BITS, TAPE, DISCS 00005150 399962 9304033971 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.37 MARKER LAMP 00005150 400085 9304043258 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 298.25- CREDIT 400276 9600050992 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 316.92 403872 5/5/2016 135974 MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC 333.33 CLASSES FOR MAR/APR 400155 0010899-IN 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 333.33 403873 5/5/2016 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 495.00 HOSTING FEE 399963 217 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 495.00 403874 5/5/2016 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 318.62 OXYGEN 00003649 400156 13242170 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 318.62 403875 5/5/2016 138266 MCCULLOUGH DESIGN SERVICES LLC 8,900.00 LANDSCAPING - RANGE 400158 1612 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 4,977.50 LANDSCAPING - EXEC 400157 1613 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 13,877.50 403876 5/5/2016 138247 MCHUGH, GERALDINE 13.36 POOL PASS REFUND 400067 042816 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 — 5/5/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403876 5/5/2016 138247 MCHUGH, GERALDINE Continued... 183.64 POOL PASS REFUND 400067 042816 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 197.00 403877 5/5/2016 123847 MEDICA INSURANCE CO. 85.87 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 400068 JANETTE KUMARA 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 85.87 403878 5/5/2016 104650 MICRO CENTER 103.98 PRINTER INK 00001883 399965 6083035 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 103.98 403879 5/5/2016 105611 MILHOFF MACHINE & WELDING INC. 450.00 MACHINE CHECK VALVE 00001862 399966 16492 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 450.00 403880 5/5/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 1,852.50 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 00001778 399928 35185 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,852.50 403881 5/5/2016 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 42.68 OXYGEN, TIP CLEANER SET 400160 183214139 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 42.68 403882 5/5/2016 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 33.00 FORFEITURE FORMS 399929 200000274 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.00 403883 5/5/2016 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 792.00 EVOC CLASSES 399930 629430-5062 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 792.00 403884 5/5/2016 138087 MINNESOTA POND & PATIO 10,985.00 POND RENOVATION 400021 CENT LAKES 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 10,985.00 403885 5/5/2016 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 327.90 BACKPACK SPRAYER 00005143 399967 0113773-IN 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 327.90 403886 5/5/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 -- 5/5/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 19 Business Unit 403886 5/5/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 33.00 LOBBYING HANDOUT BOOKLETS 400069 19869 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 33.00 403887 5/5/2016 104477 MN STATE BOARD OF ASSESSORS 580.00 ASSESSOR LICENSES RENEWAL 400277 FY2017 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 580.00 403888 5/5/2016 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 4,090.00 MN GOLFER MAG AD 400161 2016-57888 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 4,090.00 403889 5/5/2016 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 3,678.00 WIRE INSTALLATION 400162 6183 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,678.00 403890 5/5/2016 130453 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 399968 1NV-087294 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 399968 INV-087294 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 399968 INV-087294 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,152.66 403891 5/5/2016 103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER 26,972.95 FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR 400070 F6804 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 26,972.95 403892 5/5/2016 136354 NEW BRIGHTON FORD 250.00- CREDIT 400089 5135512 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 268.00 BACK UP ALARMS 00005295 400088 5148094 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.00 403893 5/5/2016 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 275.00 399887 109387 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 275.00 403894 5/5/2016 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,516.61 STREET SIGN POSTS 00001558 400090 TI-0296412 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 894.15 SIGN MATERIAL 00001662 400091 TI-0296665 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 2,410.76 403895 5/5/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403895 5/5/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC. Continued... 1,207.27 STAFF SHIRTS 400278 985783737 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 37.92 SHIRT 400279 985865359 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,245.19 403896 5/5/2016 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH 167.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 400280 042916 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 167.40 403897 5/5/2016 132509 NOLAN, MARK 116.01 MILEAGE! PARKING 400281 050216 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION 116.01 403898 5/5/2016 118834 NOODLES & COMPANY 1,496.03 DEPOSIT REFUND 399969 042516 1185.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,496.03 403899 5/5/2016 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 126.84 STROBE LIGHT 00005286 399931 40969 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.84 403900 5/5/2016 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 61.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 400163 826605072001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 189.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 400164 834043944001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 24.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 400165 834044422001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 137.98 EASEL PADS 400166 834335861001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 414.13 403901 5/5/2016 138277 OGREN, HELENE L. 10.42 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 400282 155048 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.42 403902 5/5/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 26.20 CLEVIS HOOKS 00005232 399933 579404 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.20 403903 5/5/2016 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC. 107.50 REPACKING KIT 00001758 399970 36411 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 9.95 FILTER 399971 36421 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 117.45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 21 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403904 6/5/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 877.55 399888 8544472-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 988.70 400008 8545394-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,838.96 400044 8545403-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.25 400045 8545411-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,741.46 403905 5/512016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 690.26 400168 50356748 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 690.26 403906 5/5/2016 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 275.00 EDITION DESIGN 399934 042016-3 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 275.00 403907 5/5/2016 135849 PETSMART #2412 59.99 PO 3025 400071 K9 FOOD 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 63.99 P03022 400071 K9 FOOD 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 123.98 403908 5/5/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 359.12 399891 2963616 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 438.42 399889 2963618 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 624.12 399893 2963620 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 48.64 399894 2963622 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,329.22 399890 2963628 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 891.60 399892 2964696 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 47.66 400046 2967378 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 887.02 400223 2967380 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 832.16 400224 2967381 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 381.40 400225 2967382 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 945.01 400222 2967384 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,050.24 400221 2967385 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,640.23 400047 2967386 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12,474.84 403909 5/5/2016 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC. 50.00 EMS FAXING 400169 116102576 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 403910 5/5/2016 100119 PING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 — 5/5/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403910 5/5/2016 100119 PING Continued... 307.54 GOLF CLUBS 400298 13240040 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 307.54 403911 5/5/2016 101138 PLEAA 120.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 400283 SPRING 2106 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 120.00 403912 5/5/2016 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 2,392.38 TRAILER REPAIRS 400092 22809 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,392.38 403913 5/5/2016 138267 QUALITY LOCKSMITH SERVICE 170.00 DOOR REPAIR 400171 QL56311 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 170.00 403914 5/5/2016 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 978.88 CRS2 OIL 400284 5397 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 978.88 403915 5/5/2016 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 64.76 FOOT SWITCH 00005290 399935 10030MN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.87 FREIGHT CHARGE 00005290 399936 10033MN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.63 403916 5/5/2016 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 121.49 SAFETY BOOTS 399937 12-268 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 121.49 403917 5/5/2016 108672 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 140.00 TRAINING 400285 2110001204 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 140.00 403918 5/5/2016 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 275.00 INSTALL VVINDSHIELD 400093 73277 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275.00 403919 5/5/2016 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 615.68 SOFTENER SALT 400174 00332383 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 615.68 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 — 5/5/2016 Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 23 Business Unit 403920 5/5/2016 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT Continued.. 135.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 399940 999999-4/16 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 135.00 403921 5/5/2016 137771 SAND CREEK GROUP LTD, THE 731.78 ORGANIZATION REDEVELOPMENT 399941 94042 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 731.78 403922 5/5/2016 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 315.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 400286 050216 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 315.00 403923 5/5/2016 100995 SEH 2,527.70 ANTENNA PROJECTS 399942 313662 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 2,527.70 403924 5/5/2016 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 288.00 NAME PLATES 400175 46037 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 288.00 403925 5/5/2016 137092 SHAKOPEE GRAVEL 230.49 GRAVEL 399973 16792 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 230.49 403926 5/5/2016 105763 SHAW / STEWART LUMBER CO. 310.87 BANQUET RM VALANCES 400176 591185-001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 310.87 403927 5/5/2016 120784 SIGN PRO 175.00 EDINAART CENTER AD 400287 10279 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.15 SIGNS 400177 10333 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 235.15 403928 5/5/2016 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 48.32 HOT DOG BUNS 400178 284572 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 48.32 403929 5/5/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 148.89 TOOL DRAWER 00005178 399974 ARV/28672072 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 148.89 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403930 5/5/2016 133014 SOCCER SHOTS Continued... 21,560.00 SPRING SOCCER SEASON 400072 CORNELIA PK 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP 21,560.00 403931 5/5/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 3,578.90 399895 1398828 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 894.40 399896 139883 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,201.60 400048 1401246 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 157.69 400049 1401248 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 170.11 400013 1401251 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10,049.70 400009 1401252 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,922.63 400012 1401253 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 107.80 400010 1401254 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 604.00 400011 1401255 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 632.40 400054 1401256 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,691.70 400050 1401257 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 80.80 400052 1401258 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,286.80 400051 1401259 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,120.53 400053 1401261 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 29,499.06 403932 5/5/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 168.00 400014 10590 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 168.00 403933 5/5/2016 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 433.60 TIRES 00005230 399944 10138863 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 433.60 403934 5/5/2016 117869 SUNICE USA INC. 532.34 STAFF JACKETS 400180 1193453 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 532.34 403935 5/5/2016 138281 TARRAF CONSTRUCTION INC. 15,000.00 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 400297 APPL 1 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 15,000.00 403936 5/5/2016 104932 TAYLOR MADE 48.41 HATS 400288 31590003 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 48.41 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403937 5/5/2016 120602 TEAGUE, CARY Continued... 122.58 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 400289 042916 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 122.58 403938 5/5/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,179.31 400227 1072168 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 58.50 400226 1074625 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 25.00- 400055 1074633 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,212.81 403939 5/5/2016 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 303.50 4/5/16 COUNCIL MEETING 400181 M22047 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 303.50 403940 5/5/2016 128347 TKO WINES INC. 919.20 399897 3223 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 50TH ST SELLING 919.20 403941 5/5/2016 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 81.62 WELDING GAS 00005224 399945 10131179 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.62 403942 5/5/2016 101360 TVVIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 11.01 DOOR STOPS 00001554 400023 780315 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 11.01 403943 5/5/2016 103048 U.S. BANK 450.00 2009A PAYING AGENT 400291 4279425 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 450.00 2009B PAYING AGENT 400290 4279426 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 900.00 403944 5/5/2016 133209 USPCA REGION 18 240.00 K9 TRIALS 400292 REGISTRATION 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 403945 5/5/2016 133209 USPCA REGION 18 50.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 400293 WENANDE 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 403946 5/5/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 730.18 CLEANING SUPPLIES 400182 384521-00 5420.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403946 5/5/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO. Continued... 730.18 403947 5/5/2016 120318 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 177.74 LAMP RECYCLING 399976 EW1110439 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 177.74 403948 5/5/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 200.00 GEC! RECEPTACLES 00001822 400183 1317578 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 64.08 PHOTO CELLS - STREET LIGHTS 00001835 400184 1342115 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 264.08 403949 5/5/2016 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 1,531.17 SAFETY VESTS 400294 3075530 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 194.25 SAFETY VESTS 399977 3075535 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,725.42 403950 5/5/2016 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 154.69 BRATS 400188 92906 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 154.69 403951 5/5/2016 138282 WALKER, JOSEPH M 5.84 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 400296 050216 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 80.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 400296 050216 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 85.84 403952 5/5/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 40.00- 399903 707617 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 599.64 399901 7078049 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20.91 399902 7078052 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20.91 400063 7079061 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,805.76 400230 7079063 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,514.44 400229 7079065 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,921.66 403953 5/5/2016 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 17.38 GFCI RECEPTACLE 00001800 400189 13042500 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 63.23 ELECTRICAL BOXES, FITTINGS 00001889 399978 13096200 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 80.61 403964 5/5/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 5/5/2016 - Inv No 5/5/2016 Account No Subledger - Account Description Business Unit 403954 5/5/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 49.86 51-5276505-8 399949 497641763 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 51.86 51-4420190-3 399950 498501992 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 14.76 51-0010619811-5 399951 498557517 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 29.97 51-0223133-2 399989 498582343 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 17.78 51-0160483-1 399988 498583194 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 2,643.29 51-4159265-8 400234 498635658 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 15.26 51-6541084-2 399993 498675044 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 88.87 51-5938955-6 399990 498675281 5937.6185 LIGHT & POWER INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 24.40 51-9770163-6 399991 498713779 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 24.61 51-0010118404-0 399979 498715014 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 229.24 51-0010166207-2 399980 498725145 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.98 51-0010619455-3 399984 498726312 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 13.93 51-0010573384-9 399981 498727026 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 12.91 51-0010573502-3 399983 498727303 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 15.15 51-0010777228-2 399985 498731939 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 25.07 51-0010876028-0 399987 498737271 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 21.25 51-0010876012-2 399986 498738808 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 42.15 51-0011004217-3 400096 498738890 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 13.26 51-0010573385-0 399982 498741338 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 86.38 51-9770164-7 399992 498746958 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 30,463.62 51-4621797-2 400236 498819979 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,282.34 51-6644819-9 400235 498848260 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 30.74 51-8976004-9 400237 498874222 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 43,268.68 403955 5/5/2016 138268 YOUNG, ANNIE 133.25 ART WORK SOLD 400190 042916 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 133.25 403956 5/5/2016 132109 YOUNG, SEAN 113.05 K9 SUPPLIES 400074 REIMBURSE 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 113.05 403957 5/5/2016 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 298.00 400016 16813 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 298.00 403958 5/5/2016 130178 ZARRIN, SARAH 162.11 EEC EVENT 400295 SUPPLIES 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 162.11 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/5/2016 — 5/5/2016 5/3/2016 13:28:40 Page - 28 Account No Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 403958 5/5/2016 130178 ZARRIN, SARAH Continued... 413,073.22 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 371,612.82 41,460.40 413,073.22 pro3ctures djeT • inanc R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 105,664.19 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 792.00 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 450.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 6,024.93 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 27,926.95 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,552.83 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 647.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 25,556.76 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 19,331.40 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 142.75 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 9,737.16 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 12,344.63 05800 LIQUOR FUND 159,884.30 05900 UTILITY FUND 12,277.47 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,102.87 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 28,637.98 Report Totals 413,073.22 CITY OF EDINA 5/3/2016 13:29:03 Council Check Summary Page - 1 5/5/2016 - 5/5/2016 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2016-54 Approving Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant - Minnesota Department of Health Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the Edina Community Health Board to enter into the attached agreement. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report and Resolution Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Mayor and Council Jeff Brown Community Health Administrator ☒ ☐ ☐ May 17, 2016 Resolution No. 2016-54 Approving Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-54 authorizing the City of Edina to amend the current Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). Information / Background: The City of Edina receives funding from the Minnesota Department of Health for Public Health Emergency Preparedness to continue preparing for response to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, mass dispensing, and other threats to public health. This amendment provides funding for the final year of a five-year performance period for the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant and Cities Readiness Initiative. This is the final budget period, which will be used to complete all grant duties, exercises, work plans and deliverables. The amount for this budget period is $55,447. The City contracts with Bloomington Public Health for completion of these grant duties. The funding for this budget period was reduced by seven percent across Minnesota, including Edina, to accommodate the national response to Zika virus. The City Attorney has reviewed the agreement. Additional Information / Background: Resolution No. 2016-54 Minnesota Department of Health Grant Project Agreement Amendment RESOLUTION NO 2016-54 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO ENTER INTO A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services, and WHEREAS, the STATE and the City of Edina have entered into a master grant contract effective January 1, 2015, and WHEREAS, the STATE has entered into an agreement with the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to assist local health departments in demonstrating measurable and sustainable progress toward achieving public health preparedness capabilities and other activities that promote safer and more resilient communities, and implement and carry out the CDC's Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into Public Health Emergency Response Grant Agreement Amendment with the Minnesota Department of Health to successfully complete administrative and programmatic duties contained within this grant agreement. Passed and adopted this 17th day of May 2016. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 17, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2016. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Reject Bid - Contract No. ENG 16-10 Wooddale Avenue Bridge and Valley View Pedestrian Bridge Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Reject Bids for Contract No. ENG 16-10 Wooddale Avenue Bridge and Valley View Road Pedestrian Bridge INTRODUCTION: See attached detailed Request for Purchase Report ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase - Reject Bids City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 May 17, 2016 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☐ ☒ Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Reject Bid – Contract No. ENG 16-10 Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road Bridges April 21, 2016 May 21, 2016 S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. Pember Companies, Inc. LS Black constructors, Inc. C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. $419,441.15 $517,007.00 $554,462.70 $590,161.61 $715,966.10 Recommended Quote or Bid: Reject Bids Information/Background: The Wooddale Avenue bridge over Minnehaha Creek just south of 50th St and the Valley View Road pedestrian bridge over the south fork of Nine Mile Creek are two separate projects that staff coupled together into one bid package with the expectation that economies of scale would result in lower bid prices. The engineers estimated costs for the Wooddale bridge and the Valley View bridge were $200,000 and $85,000, respectively. Bid prices for the two bridges were $286,065.10 and $133,376.05, respectively. Due to the increase in bid prices, the funding sources, which include bridge maintenance funds and Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) funds, are not able to cover the costs of the two projects. Moving forward, staff will vet options to lessen the scope of the Wooddale Bridge project and then bid the two projects separately. Without the need for a specialty contractor to complete labor intensive work on the Wooddale Bridge project, staff expects the Valley View Bridge to attract more traditional bridge contractors resulting in lower bids. Staff is recommending the City Council reject the bid and authorize staff to rebid the projects separately. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of April 6, 2016 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Report of April 6, 2016. INTRODUCTION: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the April 6, 2016 Traffic Safety Report at their April 21 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of April 6, 2016 Draft Minutes ETC, Apr 21, 2016 May 17, 2016 Mayor and City Council Joe Totten, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of April 6, 2016 Information / Background: Section A : Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends approval. A1. Request for parking restrictions on Thielen Avenue This request comes from a garbage hauling company which notes that with the current parking layout, Thielen Avenue becomes unserviceable when cars are parked across from one another. • Thielen Avenue is a short cul-de-sac, with no turnaround and 19 houses. • The street has a width of at most 24 feet, has a sidewalk on each side of the roadway, and uses surmountable curb. • The Edina Living Streets Policy states that a local street with a width of 24’-27’ feet should have one sided parking or two sided parking if deemed necessary. • The Minnesota State Fire Code has a section on dead-end streets and access roads, stating that when in excess of 500 feet roadways must be 26 feet in width. • In a survey sent to the nineteen (19) households on the road, eleven (11) were returned. o Four (4) households would support parking restrictions at all times, and one would support part time restrictions during garbage pick-up times (Thursday mornings). o Six (6) households were opposed to the idea of any parking restrictions. • Staff previously recommended that parking be maintained on the odd side of the road. • Calculations show that the even side has 13 legal parking spaces, while the odd side has 11. Photo : Thielen Avenue from 44th Street Map : Thielen Avenue, as it intersects 44th Street Traffic Safety Preview of Apr. 06, 2016 Page 2 Photo : Looking south along Tracy Avenue, Countryside School is on the right, while Countryside Road is on the left. Map : Tracy Avenue and Countryside Road After review, staff recommends that one sided parking be instituted on the street, with parking being maintained on the west (even) side of the street, in order to maintain the greatest number of on street parking stalls. A2. Children cross Tracy Avenue at Countryside Road and further south to get to Countryside School. Requestor feels that this creates a dangerous situation with the curves and speeds of drivers northbound not being able to see children in time. This request comes from a neighbor who is concerned that children cross Tracy Avenue to get to Countryside School from the south too close to the curves, and the speed of drivers makes stopping before the crossing difficult. • One day of video was collected and analyzed, in that time 12 people walked to or from the school property on the west side of the roadway, where there is no sidewalk; 10 people crossed at Countryside; and 8 people crossed south of Countryside, but still north of the curves on Tracy. • The curves on Tracy Avenue are 385 feet from Countryside Road, the stopping sight distance for 30 miles per hour is considered to be 200 feet, and for 35 miles per hour, stopping sight distance is 250 feet. • The curves on Tracy Avenue have a design speed of 28 miles per hour. • Two radar studies of the area were performed between 15:30-16:00 and 09:00- 09:20 and, and found an 85th-percentile speeds of 34 and 31 miles per hour, respectively, as vehicles exit the turns on Tracy Avenue. After review, staff recommends continuing with 2016 reconstruction plans, as there will be a crosswalk and path installed at the intersection of Countryside Road and Tracy Avenue. Further, there currently exists enough stopping sight distance for stopping short of a crossing. Traffic Safety Preview of Apr. 06, 2016 Page 3 Photo : Clover Ridge at Valley View Road, the possible issue parking is shown on the far left of this picture. Section B : Items which staff recommends for no action B1. Clover Ridge and Valley View Road sightline concerns caused by parked cars. This request was forwarded to staff, and regards high parking times near the Normandale Lutheran Church on Valley View Road. The concern is that left turns from Clover Ridge onto Valley View Road could not see far enough to their right to ensure a clear turn. A video was taken of the intersection over the weekend, and neighbors confirmed that the parking seen that weekend was typical of normal Sundays. • The closest parking to the intersection is shown in the photo, at 19.5 feet from the intersection (1/2 foot too close). • Staff parked a vehicle twenty feet away from the intersection to investigate sightlines, and found that at eight (8) feet from the curbline of Valley View Road (a distance equal or greater than the distance between the front bumper and driver’s eye in most cars) had sufficient sight distance. • Valley View Road only allows parking on the west side of this intersection, and the near lane at the intersection is 17.0 feet wide. • Parking lanes outlined in the Living Streets Plan are typically 7.0 feet wide. • There are no bumpouts at this corner, and sidewalk only on the northeast corner. After review, staff determined that it is safe for a driver stopped on Clover Ridge to pull forward such that their front bumper is even with the curb line of Valley View to gain sufficient sight distance for left turns during church services. Staff has recommended this strategy to the requestor, and recommends no further actions. Section D: Other items handled by Traffic Safety D1. A requestor called with concerns about high speeds on Benton Avenue, and asked for targeted enforcement and education on the street to discourage speeding. To address speed concerns, a previously taken volume study was reanalyzed and sent to the police department, with peak times of speed violations noted. The requestor also had concerns on the State-Aid system carrying too much volume, and wishing to spread this volume to more side (local) streets; this concern was addressed with an explanation of the State- Aid system, and how these roads are designed to carry more traffic and larger vehicles better than side streets. Map : Clover Ridge and Valley View Road Traffic Safety Preview of Apr. 06, 2016 Page 4 D2. A requestor was frustrated with recent reconstruction in the City of Edina, as they were certain that West 70th Street and West 50th Street used to be marked as four lanes continually from Trunk Highway 100 to France Avenue. The requestor also voiced opposition to spending money, or increasing travel time for drivers for bicycle or pedestrian convenience or safety because the requestor felt that no one walks in Edina. The requestor was told that these streets were not marked as four-lane roadways before the last reconstructions. D3. A resident was concerned with a fellow resident parking too close to an intersection. When the requestor tried to correct the situation and work with their neighbor to resolve the issue, she was met with un-pleasantries and otherwise “hostile” actions. This request was forwarded to the police department. Further, a pink mark was placed on the road, thirty feet from the stop sign, to mark where legal parking starts. D4. Two residents called to discuss concerns about drivers’ behavior at stop signs, as well as speed, specifically on Division Street, and Rutledge Avenue. The requesters asked for solutions to speed, inattention and possible apathy by drivers using the streets, and suggested some solutions. Currently this intersection will have a crosswalk and pedestrian landings added on the west side, which will highlight vulnerable users and may change the feel of the roadway overall. Additional ideas for how to calm traffic were discussed with the residents, including what they can do absent of a reconstruction, or other large public works. G:\ENG\TRAN\TRAF SFTY COMM\Staff Review Summaries\16 TSAC & Min\04-06-16_CC.docx Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 1 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Mayors Conference Room April 21, 6:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair LaForce called the meeting to order. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Brown, Ding, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Loeffelholz, Miranda, and Olson. Absent at roll call was member Ruehl. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Boettge approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Olson approving the edited Mar. 17, 2016, minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. A. Traffic Safety Report of April 6, 2016 Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Brown to forward the April 6, 2016, Traffic Safety Report to City Council. D.2. Member Bass polled the commission to see how many of them walk in Edina and seven, plus two staff said they did. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Adjournment at 9:30 p.m. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase - Authorize Non-Invasive Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize City Manager to approve proposal for non-invasive water main pipe condition assessment services. INTRODUCTION: See attached Request for Purchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering ☒ ☐ May 17, 2016 Request for Purchase – Authorize Non-Invasive Water Main Pipe Condition Assessment Services April 27, 2016 N/A Short Elliot Hendrickson (SEH), Inc. $59,900.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. $59,900.00 General Information: You may recall for the past two years we have found it to be advantageous to assess water main pipe conditions in project areas that are scheduled for street reconstruction. The non-invasive water main testing provides us with more data about the condition of our water main system similar to the closed circuit televising we do for sanitary sewer trunk pipes. This data, plus water main break data proves to be a powerful tool. This proposal includes assessment of approximately 11,452 linear feet of water main in our anticipated 2018 street reconstruction project areas. This will be funded by the utility fund. Staff recommends hiring SEH in conjunction with Echologics to complete the non-invasive watermain pipe condition assessment in the anticipated 2018 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction project areas. Attachment: • Engineering Proposal G:\PW\INFRAS\UTILITIES DIV\WATER\Echologics Scanning\2016\RFP_Auth Non-Invasive WM Pipe Svcs.docx Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT April 27, 2016 RE: City of Edina 2016 Pipe Condition Assessment Project SEH No. EDINA136921 14.00 Mr. Chad Millner City Engineer City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: Thank you for again expressing interest in SEH’s professional services to non-invasively assess the condition of the City’s water main pipes (pipes). SEH teams with Echologics, a division of Mueller Company, to use their Echo Shore tool (tool) to complete the City’s assessment. We will provide these services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. SUMMARY The City wants to assess the condition of 11,452 linear feet of pipe for 2016 in various streets and neighborhoods as outlined in Exhibit 1. During this trip to Minnesota, the tool will assess the condition of pipes in two other Minnesota Cities. Working in more than one City per trip allows us to spread the tool’s mobilization cost among multiple Cities. This reduces the cost that any one City will pay for an assessment of its pipes. BENEFITS Please recall from past year’s projects that choosing to apply this tool to the City’s pipes provides the following immediate benefits. 1. Reduce the amount of money the City spends to create potable water. 2. Reduce the amount of electricity the City uses to distribute potable water. 3. Reduce the cost the City might spend to excavate and restore the area around a leak by catching the leak in its earliest stages. 4. Allow the City to better coordinate pipe rehabilitation with capital improvement plans for other infrastructure occupying the right-of-way or easement. Mr. Chad Millner April 27, 2016 Page 2 5. Allow the City to better understand how much of its pipe network may need rehabilitation. DELIVERABLES Below is a list of deliverables we will provide to the City at the conclusion of the assessment. We will submit a draft report to the City within 6 weeks of completing field work. Field work is anticipated to occur in August or September depending on schedules of all cities participating. 1. An update to the City GIS shape file or geodatabase (geodatabase) for each reach of pipe. We define a reach of pipe as between fire hydrants or main line valves. The update will add the following attributes to the shape file or geodatabase. a. An estimate how much pipe wall has been lost to date. b. An estimate of the pipe’s corrosion rate. c. An estimate of the pipe’s remaining wall thickness. 2. A written report summarizing the results of the condition assessment and leak detection containing the following information. a. Introduction. b. A discussion of the purpose of leak detection and condition assessment. c. A discussion of the background of leak detection and condition assessment. d. A discussion of the methodology of leak detection and condition assessment. e. A description of the instrumentation used to complete the work. f. Tabulation of condition assessment results. g. Description of deficiencies the crew found in the field along the pipe network. h. An appendix showing the measured results for each reach of pipe. i. An appendix containing a summary tabulation of condition assessment ranked from worst to best. ESTIMATED COSTS We will complete our work for an estimated not-to-exceed fee of $59.900. This cost includes reimbursable expenses. We will invoice the City for our work on a lump sum basis. We understand that the City Council will consider this Supplemental Letter Agreement at its May 17, 2016 meeting. Exhibit 2 enclosed with this letter is Echologics Technical Requirements, Specifications, and Constraints. Exhibit 2 outlines the work we assume will be undertaken by City forces at their own expense. Asking us to accomplish work in Exhibit 2 will cause an additional expense. Also, we cannot guarantee that the other two Minnesota Cities will proceed with their projects. If they choose not to proceed, it is understood that the City may elect to reconsider proceeding with the project depending on any potential increase in the mobilization costs. This Supplemental Letter Agreement and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. Mr. Chad Millner April 27, 2016 Page 3 As always, we look forward to serving the City and applying our expertise assessing the condition of the City’s water main pipes. Please contact me with questions and comments at 612.255.8747 or dhutton@sehinc.com. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. David E. Hutton, PE Senior Professional Engineer Enclosure c: Brian Turner, Echologics Toby Muse, SEH Jen Schumann, SEH Paul Pasko, SEH p:\ae\e\edina\136921\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\draft letter proposal 041916.docx Accepted on this day of , 2016 City of Edina, Minnesota By: Name City of Edina Exhibit 1 2016 PCA Edina Pipe Data Segment Site Distance (ft) Start Valve End Valve Pipe Material Internal Diameter (in) 1 W 62nd St 353 2697 4604 DI 12.0 2 W 62nd St 916 4604 3471 DI 8.0 3 W 62nd St 319 3471 2017 DI 8.0 4 W 62nd St 337 2017 2739 DI 8.0 5 W 60th St 104 4309 4310 CI 6.0 6 W 60th St 558 4310 2625 CI 6.0 7 W 60th St 600 2625 2618 CI 6.0 8 Parnell Ave 40 2625 2626 CI 6.0 9 Parnell Ave 428 2626 4093 CI 6.0 10 Virginia Ave 522 4306 4307 CI 6.0 11 Ryan Ave 546 4308 3279 CI 6.0 12 Ryan Ave 308 3279 1450 CI 6.0 13 Parnell Ave 311 3282 1461 CI 6.0 14 Virginia Ave 691 2599 3463 CI 6.0 15 Virginia Ave 24 3463 1467 CI 6.0 16 Virginia Ln 322 3464 1458 CI 6.0 17 W 62nd St 304 1449 3280 CI 6.0 18 W 62nd St 342 3280 3462 CI 6.0 19 W 62nd St 40 3462 1467 CI 6.0 20 Parnell Ave 611 1468 1464 CI 6.0 21 Virginia Ave 647 1467 2604 CI 6.0 22 Virginia Ave 295 2604 698 CI 6.0 23 W 63rd St 319 2605 2604 CI 6.0 24 Edina Ct 281 1843 1510 DI 4.0 25 Edina Ct 43 1510 1844 DI 6.0 26 Habitat Ct 353 4744 887 DI 6.0 27 Waterford Ct 116 4743 214 DI 6.0 28 Lincoln Dr 166 1063 4462 DI 12.0 29 Lincoln Dr 344 4462 4740 DI 12.0 30 Lincoln Dr 356 4740 4853 DI 12.0 31 Lincoln Dr 364 4853 4860 DI 12.0 32 Lincoln Dr/Malibu Dr 371 4860 4862 DI 12.0 33 Lincoln Dr 84 4853 4876 DI 6.0 34 Lincoln Dr 37 4876 450 DI 6.0 11,452 7. Technical Requirements, Specifications, and Constraints 7.1. Operational Requirements 7.1.1. Owner shall supply an experienced crew for operation of all Owner owned apparatus. The size of the crew depends on the details of the job. Echologics is not responsible for any operation or modification of Owner owned apparatus. 7.1.2. All fittings must be cleaned, exercised and in safe working condition prior to survey. Closed valves or other appurtenances must not be passing water. Hydrants must not be leaking. If cleaning cannot be performed prior to site- work, on site cleaning must be arranged by Client on request. 7.1.3. Client shall provide traffic management (including man power and equipment) as and when required. Echologics is not responsible for any traffic control requirements, unless explicitly included in this proposal. It is expected that the client will be proficient in all local laws and regulations. 7.1.4. If indicated as a requirement during the Project Planning phase, Echologics shall supply one crew member trained as a confined space entrant. All other aspects of confined space entry shall be of the responsibility of Client, unless explicitly included in this proposal. 7.1.5. Fall protection, including supply of fall prevention equipment and harnesses, shall be of the responsibility of Client. 7.1.6. Echologics shall follow any Lock out Tag and Tag out procedures specified by Client. Client is responsible for informing Echologics of any such procedures in effect at the work sites applicable for this project. 7.1.7. All required information regarding the pipes to be tested must be provided in advance to Echologics. The information must be up to date and in a form that can be easily interpreted. This includes as-built drawings, repair history, nominal pipe information, GIS information, pressure and flow information, locations of PRVs, pumps, reservoirs, cross-connections, reducers, tie-ins, valves, services, backflow preventers, hydrants, corp valves, and any other possible noise producing apparatus. 7.1.8. If De-chlorination / Chlorination and/or backflow preventers are required, these shall be the responsibility of Client. 7.2. General Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.2.1. Fluid temperature must be between 33º and 100º F (0.5º and 38º C) EXHIBIT 2 7.2.2. Liquid flow velocities above 5 ft/s (1.5 m/s) may result in turbulence in the line, introducing noise which can reduce the sensitivity of leak detection, and prevent collection of pipe integrity testing data. Echologics recommends that Client take steps to ensure velocities are below these levels, but will conduct testing nonetheless if Client elects to leave them at higher levels. 7.2.3. Operating pressure must be between 15 and 150psi (100 to 1000 kpa). Pressures outside of this range will require special consideration. 7.2.4. Large air pockets cannot be present in the pipe. Purging of all air may be required. 7.2.5. Significant amounts of dispersed air (milky water) can skew results. Purging of dispersed air may be required. 7.2.6. All forms of non-destructive testing involve an inherent and unavoidable level of uncertainty. The results provided by Echologics are not guaranteed. The methods used for leak detection and condition assessment are highly dependent on input parameters therefore it is not possible to certify the results. Echologics is not responsible any actions taken or recommendations made by Client based on the results of the report. 7.3. Leak Detection Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.3.1. Acceptable pipe materials are: Pit Cast Iron, Spun Cast Iron, Steel, Ductile Iron, Asbestos Cement, Reinforced or Bar-wrapped Concrete, PVC, PE and other Plastics 7.3.2. Surface mounted sensors can be magnetically attached to appurtenances such as line valves, hydrant secondary valves or to the top of the pipe at a maximum sensor-to-sensor spacing of 1000ft (300m) 7.3.3. Longer sensor-to-sensor spacing will require the use of hydrophones 7.3.3.1. Suitable access is required to attach or adapt a 1.5” NPT female fitting to a valved fitting such as a corp valves, air blow offs, fire hydrants or tapped blind flanges. 7.3.3.2. The maximum sensor-to-sensor spacing for Hydrophone sensors is 2500ft (750m) 7.3.4. Vertical access is required to lower the sensor down from the surface. Angled or broken valve chamber are not suitable. 7.3.5. The connection point must be free of dirt and debris and in good working order 7.3.6. Performance specifications are based on a sensor spacing of 330ft (100m) 7.3.7. Performance specifications assume that accurate information has been provided regarding and pipe location including locations of bends and elevation changes. 7.3.8. Performance specifications assume that accurate information regarding pipe type (material) and diameter has been provided. 7.3.9. Diameters may range from 1” to 120” (25mm to 3050mm) in diameter. Larger mains are possible but special consideration must be taken. 7.3.10. Leaks location accuracies depend on sensor spacing, pipe material consistency, and other factors, but are generally within 10 ft (3 m) of its actual position when accurate information for pipe type and diameter is provided. 7.3.11. Sensitivity to small leaks varies depending on pipe diameter and material, as well as sensor spacing and the presence of noise inside the pipe. Leaks as small as 2.5 GPM (9.5 l/m) can consistently be located, and leaks as small as 0.5 GPM (2 l/m) can be located under good conditions. 7.4. Condition Assessment Technical Specifications and Constraints 7.4.1. Acceptable pipe materials are: Pit Cast Iron, Spun Cast Iron, Steel, Ductile Iron, Asbestos Cement and Reinforced or Bar-wrapped Concrete 7.4.2. Surface mounted sensors can be magnetically attached to appurtenances such as line valves, hydrant secondary valves or to the top of the pipe at a maximum sensor-to-sensor spacing of 500ft (150m) 7.4.3. Longer sensor-to-sensor spacing will require the use of hydrophones 7.4.3.1. Suitable access is required to attach or adapt a 1.5” NPT female fitting to a valved fitting such as a corp valves, air blow offs, fire hydrants or tapped blind flanges. 7.4.3.2. The maximum sensor-to-sensor spacing for Hydrophone sensors is 1500ft (450m) 7.4.4. Vertical access is required to lower the sensor down from the surface. Angled or broken valve chamber are not suitable. 7.4.5. For every location, there must be a local fitting where liquid temperature and pressure can be measured. Fittings include fire hydrants, pitot taps, sampling stations and other similar appurtenances. 7.4.6. The connection point must be free of dirt and debris and in good working order 7.4.7. Diameters may range from 1” to 60” (25mm to 1525mm) in diameter. Larger mains are possible but special consideration must be taken. 7.4.8. Concrete, Mortar and Bitumen linings are acceptable if the thickness is specified 7.4.9. PVC, PE and other plastic mains are not suitable for acoustic condition assessment. 7.4.10. Performance specifications are based on a sensor spacing of 330ft (100m) 7.4.11. Performance specifications assume that accurate information has been provided regarding and pipe location including locations of bends and elevation changes. 7.4.12. Performance specifications assume that accurate information regarding pipe type (material) and diameter has been provided. 7.4.13. Accuracy of average pipe wall thickness calculations varies depending on many factors, including the consistency of the pipe materials, accuracy of the design information provided, accuracy of the pipe alignment information provided, consistency of the fluid’s bulk modulus, and consistency of the water’s temperature. In most cases, accuracies shall fall within the following ranges: 7.4.13.1. For metallic mains, average minimum pipe wall thickness will be provided within 0.15” (3.8mm). For metallic mains with lining, this will be provided as an equivalent structural thickness. 7.4.13.2. For asbestos cement mains, the average minimum structural wall thickness will be provided within 0.15” (3.8mm) 7.4.13.3. For Reinforced and Bar-wrapped concrete mains, the average minimum structural stiffness will be provided within 7200 kpsi or 50Gpa 7.4.14. For liquids other than potable or raw water, a bulk modulus calibration must be performed when needed. Normally at the outset of testing and any other times during the testing when the bulk modulus may change (during a rain event for sewer force mains) Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase - Cornelia Tennis Courts Resurfacing CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the quote for $39,650 for resurfacing and restriping the Two Double Tennis Courts at Cornelia Park INTRODUCTION: This is for a replacement of the tennis court surface at Cornelia Park. The project would be funded from the Paths and Hard Surface general fund budget. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff report City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 05/17/2016 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Brian E. Olson Request For Purchase – Cornelia Park Tennis Courts 04/27/2016 Bituminous Roadways, Inc Tennis West Midwest Asphalt Corporation $39,650 $46,570 $47,200 Recommended Quote or Bid: Bituminous Roadways, Inc Information/Background: This is for a replacement of the tennis court surface at Cornelia Park. The project would be funded from the Paths and Hard Surface general fund budget. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase - Creek Valley Park Tennis Courts CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the quote for $39,100 for resurfacing and restriping the Two Double Tennis Courts at Creek Valley Park INTRODUCTION: This is for a replacement of the tennis court surface at Creek Valley Park. The project would be funded from the Paths and Hard Surface general fund budget. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 05/17/2016 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Brian E. Olson Request For Purchase – Creek Valley Park Tennis Courts 04/27/2016 Bituminous Roadways, Inc Tennis West Midwest Asphalt Corporation $39,100 $45,570 $47,100 Recommended Quote or Bid: Bituminous Roadways, Inc Information/Background: This is for a replacement of the tennis court surface at Creek Valley Park. The project would be funded from the Paths and Hard Surface general fund budget. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for an Extension of the Preliminary Plat for Berman Woods, 5331 Evanswood Lane Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Extend the Preliminary Plat for one year. INTRODUCTION: The property owner is requesting a one-year extension for the Preliminary Plat for Berman Woods. The applicant is not ready to develop the property at this time, and therefore, requests a year extension. ATTACHMENTS: Description Extension Request Letter Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Tom Schmitz, Fire Chief Item Activity: Subject:Proclaming EMS Week Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Proclamation for EMS Week INTRODUCTION: May 15 - 21, 2016 is National EMS Week. During the week we take time to recognize and thank the many police, fire, EMT and paramedic responders along with our dispatchers that serve our community throughout the year. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclaming EMS Week A P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, emergency medical services is a vital public service; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services teams of the Edina Fire and Police Departments are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival rate and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, the emergency medical services system consist of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, peace officers, educators, administrators, and others; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services providers have traditionally severed as the safety net of America’s health care system; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services responders of the Edina Fire and Police departments engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills: and WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Edina benefit daily from the knowledge and skills of these highly trained individuals; and WHEREAS, injury prevention and the appropriate use of the Emergency Medical Services System will help reduce health care cost; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of the Edina Police and Edina Fire emergency medical personnel who serve to protect us; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we, the City of Edina City Council, do hereby proclaim the week of May 15 – 21, 2016 as “Emergency Medical Services Week” EMS Strong – Called to Care In the City of Edina in honor and recognition of the valuable contributions made by the Edina Emergency Medical Service Providers to the health and well-being of our citizens. _________________________________________ Mayor James B. Hovland Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Item Activity: Subject:2016 Edina Heritage Award - 5201 Wooddale Avenue Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The 2016 Edina Heritage Award will be presented to the recipient chosen by the Heritage Preservation Board. A PowerPoint presentation will be followed by the commemorative plaques presented to the recipients. ATTACHMENTS: Description Power Point Presentation The CITY of EDINA 2016 EDINA HERITAGE AWARD VAYDA RESIDENCE 5201 WOODDALE AVENUE The CITY of EDINA Vayda Residence 5201 Wooddale Ave. www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Before & After – Front The CITY of EDINA Before & After - Rear www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA Living Room – Before & After www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA Kitchen & Dining Room www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA 1940 Crier Electric Home of the Month www.EdinaMN.gov 7 The CITY of EDINA 2016 Heritage Award – 5201 Wooddale Ave. www.EdinaMN.gov 8 Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation for 50th Anniversary of the Edina Art Fair Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of the Proclamation. INTRODUCTION: This proclamation seeks recognition of the 50th Anniversary of the Edina Art Fair. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation - 50th Edina Art Fair PROCLAMATION Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the Edina Art Fair WHEREAS, the Edina Art Fair first began as the Edina Book Festival in 1966; and WHEREAS, the Edina Art Fair has grown to host 280 fine artists, selected through a juried process, from throughout Minnesota, the United States and Canada; and WHEREAS, the event held at the crossroads of West 50th Street and France Avenue now welcomes more than 200,000 guests each year; and WHEREAS, the Edina Art Fair is the First Official Art Fair of the Year and is the unofficial kick off to the summer for many residents of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the staff and Board of the 50th and France Business Association devote countless hours organizing the community event; and WHEREAS, the event relies on the selfless commitments from hundreds of volunteers, students and community partners; and WHEREAS, the Edina Art Fair is ranked #1 in Minnesota and in the Top 50 fine art fairs throughout the United States; and WHEREAS, this year’s event marks the 50th Anniversary of the Edina Art Fair. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims June 3 through June 5, 2016, as THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE EDINA ART FAIR in the City of Edina, MN and call upon the people of Edina to observe this anniversary in honor of the great tradition of the Edina Art Fair. Dated this 17th day of May, 2016. _________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Proclaiming National Kids to Parks Day Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Proclamation for National Kids to Parks Day, May 21, 2016. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report National Kids To Parks Day Proclamation May 17, 2016 Mayor and City Council Susan Faus Assistant Parks & Recreation Director National Kids to Parks Day Proclamation, May 21, 2016 Information / Background: Saturday May 21, 2016 is National Kids to Parks Day. Hundreds of thousands of children nationwide will take part in a grassroots movement to discover America’s parks through play to commemorate National Park Trust’s (NPT) sixth annual Kids to Parks Day. At a time when the obesity epidemic touches nearly 1 in 3 children who are either overweight or obese, communities are witnessing sky- rocketing rates of high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes and elevated cholesterol levels in children. Like Edina, other cities across the nation are committing to a simple motto: “active kids are healthy kids” and encouraging their residents to use Kids to Parks Day as the first of many days spent outdoors, at local parks and recreation sites, to develop more active, healthy lifestyles. We encourage our residents to find a local park, get outside and get active. PROCLAMATION NATIONAL KIDS TO PARKS DAY SATURDAY, MAY 21, 2016 Whereas, May 21, 2016 is the sixth National Kids to Parks Day organized and launched by the National Park Trust; and Whereas, National Kids to Parks Day empowers kids and encourages families to get outdoors and visit America’s parks; and Whereas, it is important to introduce a new generation to our nation’s parks because of the decline in park attendance over the last decades; and Whereas, we should encourage children to lead a more active lifestyle to combat the issues of childhood obesity, diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia; and Whereas, National Kids to Parks Day is open to all children and adults across the country to encourage a large and diverse group of participants; and Whereas, National Kids to Parks Day will broaden children’s appreciation for nature and the outdoors; and Now, Therefore, The Edina City Council does hereby proclaim to participate in National Kids to Parks Day. The City Council of Edina urges residents of Edina to get out and visit a park. Dated this 17th day of May, 2016 ___________________________________ James, B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: For City Council information, attached is a report that engineering staff prepared for the City Manager that summarizes how the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund was budgeted and utilized in 2015. A similar report will be presented annually to Council each spring to summarize the previous year's PACS Fund. Staff will give a brief presentation of 2015 PACS Fund projects, update the Council on proposed 2016 and 2017 projects funded by the PACS Fund, and discuss other non-motorized transportation items. ATTACHMENTS: Description Memorandum: 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Report Engineering Department • Phone 952-826-0371 Fax 952-826-0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 Date: April 1, 2016 To: Scott Neal, City Manager Chad Millner, Director of Engineering From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Re: Summary Report: 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Summary Report This memorandum briefly summarizes how the PACS Fund was budgeted and utilized in 2015. Its primary intent is to indicate what share non-motorized transportation infrastructure construction projects have of the Fund’s expenditures for last year, in addition to general information for 2015. As shown below (and in the attached table), the PACS Funds available in 2015 was $1,891,324. This includes a rollover of over $740,001 of unused PACS Funds from 2014. Note that over $720,000 is estimated to roll over from 2015 into the 2016 PACS Fund. $1,168,755 of available funds was spent on PACS-related projects and items (an increase of $276,419 or 31% over 2014). Of that, over 91% ($1,064,346) was spent on construction projects, with over 81% spent on sidewalks alone. Of the sidewalk projects expenditures, 59% went to sidewalks associated with the 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Projects and State-Aid reconstruction projects, while the remaining 41% went to “stand alone” sidewalk projects. Overall, approximately 3.0 miles of new sidewalk was installed in 2015 using the PACS Fund, an increase of 1.4 miles (or nearly 90%) over 2014. PACS Project Type Cost Total Percentage Sidewalks & Bike Facilities $951,357 81.4% Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings $108,237 9.3% Pedestrian Ramp Improvements $4,572 0.4% Total Construction: $1,064,346 91.1% Consulting Fees $18,845 1.6% Other (equipment, FTE, etc.) $85,564 7.3% Total Fees/Other: $104,409 8.9% Total 2015 PACS Expenditures: $1,168,755 100.0% Engineering Department • Phone 952-826-0371 Fax 952-826-0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 Please note that while many of the costs indicated on the attached table are actual construction costs, some costs are estimated based on pending final payments to contractors. Also, as of the time of this memorandum the 2015 utility franchise fees for the fourth quarter have yet to be received; these have been estimated. Attachments: Table: 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Expenditures Map: 2015 PACS Fund Projects G:\ENG\TRAN\NON MOTOR TRAN\PACS Fund\2015 PACS Fund Report Memo\Memo_2015 PACS Fund Report.docx 20 1 5 Pe d e s t r i a n an d C y cl i s t Sa f e t y Fu n d Ex p en d i t u r e s Av a i l a b l e PA C S Fu n d s (2 0 1 5 ut i l i t y fr a n c h i s e fe e s + 2014 rollover ) = 1 , 8 9 1 , 3 2 4 $ 95 % of PA C S Fu n d s (u s e for 2015 budget) = 1 , 7 9 6 , 7 5 8 $ Pr o j e c t Ty p e S t r e e t / I t e m L o c a t i o n Ma p Ke y Ap p r o x . LF of Fa c i l i t y No t e s C o s t Ar d e n Av e S (e a s t si d e ) W 50 t h St to W 52 n d St In d i a n o l a Av e (w e s t sid e ) S o u t h of W 50 t h St Mi n n e h a h a Bl v d (w e s t sid e ) W 52 n d St to W 54 t h St W 52 n d St (s o u t h sid e ) A r d e n Av e to Ha l i f a x Av e No r m a n d a l e Rd (w e s t sid e ) B e n t o n Av e to Cl o v e r Rid g e 1 , 1 0 0 6 2 , 7 9 3 $ Va l l e y Vi e w Rd (n o r t h si d e ‐ pr e p a r e d fo r fu t u r e sid e w a l k ) C l o v e r Rid g e to Co d e Av e ‐‐ 185,476 $ Ar b o u r Av e (e a s t an d we s t si d e s ) G r o v e St to Ar b o u r Ln C o u n t r y s i d e H N' h o o d Ro a d w a y Im p r o v e m e n t s Be n t o n Av e (s o u t h si d e ) S t u a r t Av e to Tr a c y Av e C o u n t r y s i d e H N' h o o d Ro a d w a y Im p r o v e m e n t s Su n Rd (n o r t h si d e ) O l i n g e r Bl v d to Ar b o u r Av e C o u n t r y s i d e H N' h o o d Ro a d w a y Im p r o v e m e n t s In t e r l a c h e n Av e (s o u t h sid e ) I n t e r l a c h e n Blu f f to Su m m i t Av e D 2 , 1 2 0 A c t i v e Ro u t e s to Sc h o o l re c o m m e n d a t i o n 2 9 9 , 6 2 6 $ Va l l e y Vi e w Rd (s o u t h sid e ) M c C a u l e y Tr to Ma r k Te r r a c e Dr E 2 , 8 3 5 M u n i c i p a l St a t e Ai d ro a d re c o n s t r u c t i o n 3 3 , 0 0 0 $ W 54 t h St (n o r t h si d e ) W o o d d a l e Av e to Fr a n c e Av e F 2 , 1 0 0 M u n i c i p a l St a t e Ai d ro a d re c o n s t r u c t i o n 2 3 , 9 9 5 $ Pr o m e n a d e Ph a s e 4 G a l l a g h e r Dr to Ha z e l t o n Rd G 9 0 0 S i d e w a l k po r t i o n of pr o j e c t 8 8 , 1 7 7 $ Yo r k Av e (2 0 1 4 pr o j e c t ) W 66 t h St to tr a n s i t ce n t e r ‐‐ He n n e p i n Co u n t y Co s t Pa r t i c i p a t i o n Payment ( 5 0 , 0 0 0 ) $ Ve r n o n Av e (2 0 1 4 pr o j e c t ) D o n c a s t e r Wa y to Ay r s h i r e Bl v d ‐‐ He n n e p i n Co u n t y Co s t Pa r t i c i p a t i o n Payment ( 2 7 , 7 5 0 ) $ Fi n a l pa y m e n t s fo r 20 1 3 & 20 1 4 pr o j e c t s ‐‐ 39,890 $ Re t a i n a g e fo r 20 1 5 sid e w a l k pr o j e c t s ‐‐ (17,107)$ Bi k e Fa c i l i t y Va l l e y Vi e w Rd Bi k e La n e s M c C a u l e y Tr to Ma r k Te r r a c e Dr E 2 , 8 5 0 C o s t s in c l u d e d wi t h si d e w a l k co s t s , above ‐‐ Tw o W 50 t h St RR F B Cr o s s i n g s (r e p l a c e m e n t ) W e s t of Fr a n c e Av e P e d e s t i a l ‐mo u n t e d , pe d e s t r i a n ‐ac t i v a t e d flashers 1 5 , 3 9 8 $ 50 t h & Fr a n c e Dis t r i c t Cr o s s w a l k Re p l a c e m e n t s W 50 t h St , Fr a n c e Av e , Ha l i f a x , 49 t h ‐1/ 2 T h e r m o p l a s t i c cr o s s w a l k ma r k i n g s 4 4 , 1 6 9 $ Yo r k Av e O n e So u t h d a l e Pl a c e en t r a n c e I P e d e s t r i a n ra m p im p r o v e m e n t s 4 , 5 7 2 $ Mi n n e s o t a Dr (r e s u r f a c i n g pr o j e c t w/ Cit y of Bl o o m i n g t o n ) F r a n c e Av e to Ed i n b o r o u g h Wa y J 5 0 % of ne w en h a n c e d pe d e s t r i a n cr o s s i n g 4 8 , 6 7 0 $ TL C Bik e Bo u l e v a r d Ev a l u a t i o n Co n s u l t i n g Fe e s V a l l e y Vie w Rd , Wo o d d a l e Av e , 54 t h St R e q u i r e d 2 ‐ye a r ev a l u a t i o n re p o r t 1 , 3 4 6 $ Co u r t n e y Fi e l d s Pe d e s t r i a n Br i d g e V a l l e y Vie w Rd & Br a e m a r Bl v d E n g i n e e r i n g an d so i l s te s t i n g fe e s 1 7 , 4 9 9 $ Co u n t i n g Ca m e r a (i n c l u d i n g $1 , 5 0 0 gr a n t fr o m BP H ) 3r d ca m e r a , wit h so f t w a r e li c e n s e , etc 6 9 7 $ Bik e Ra c k Co s t Sh a r e Pr o g r a m (a d v e r t i s e m e n t & in s t a l l a t i o n ) C o s t s af t e r pa y m e n t fr o m pr o p e r t y owners 1 , 4 1 5 $ Bik e Ra c k s fo r Pa r k s & Re c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t Pa i d fo r by SH I P Gr a n t ‐$ St a f f La b o r Co s t s On e FT E 8 3 , 4 5 2 $ TOTAL 2014: 1 , 1 6 8 , 7 5 5 $ * So m e co s t s ab o v e ar e es t i m a t e d , pe n d i n g fi n a l co n t r a c t o r pa y m e n t s an d re c e i p t of fo u r t h ‐qu a r t e r ut i l i t y fr a n c h i s e fe e s Re m a i n i n g in 2015 budget: 6 2 8 , 0 0 3 $ Rollover to 2016: 7 2 2 , 5 6 9 $ 3, 6 5 0 A r d e n Pa r k D N' h o o d Ro a d w a y Im p r o v e m e n t s 8 6 , 0 8 5 $ Bi r c h c r e s t B N'h o o d Ro a d w a y Im p r o v e m e n t s 3, 1 5 0 2 2 7 , 3 5 1 $ Ot h e r Co n s u l t a n t Fe e s A B C H Pe d e s t r i a n Sa f e t y Si d e w a l k ?ÞA@ ?úA@ ?úA@ ?ÞA@ B A D F G C H I E J Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake C e n t e n n i a l L a k e Minnehaha Creek Nine Mi le Creek Nine Mile Creek C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St PetersLutheran School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance PublicLibrary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool HighlandSchool EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace School SouthviewMiddleSchool CountrysideSchool Valley ViewMiddle School Creek Valley School NormandaleElementary EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessor CalvinChristianSchool FireStation B L A K E R D S C H A E F E R R D V E R N O N A V E F R A N C E A V E S X E R X E S A V E S C A H I L L R D 70TH ST W 66TH ST W Y O R K A V E S INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W G L E A S O N R D 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W /Engineering DeptApril 2016 Legend ExistingSidewalk City of Edina2015 PACS Fund Projects FutureActive RoutesTo School Sidewalk Future State-Aid Sidewalk FutureCity Sidewalk FutureNine Mile CreekRegional Trail Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Grandview District Transportation Study Presentation Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Please recall that at its Feb 17, 2016 meeting City Council received a presentation from LHB, who is the lead consultant for the team preparing the Grandview District Transportation Study. The presentation highlighted “Imagine Week” activities, which were focused on preparing and gathering input regarding potential transportation scenarios for the Grandview District that may be implemented over time. Since that time, the project team has been working to refine and develop proposed recommendations and solutions for Grandview’s transportation network based on previous efforts and stakeholder input. This project update to City Council will be part of “Recommend Week” for the Study. During Recommend Week there are three key opportunities for the public to connect with the process. First, there will be the presentation to City Council on May 17 at 7:00pm at Edina City Hall. Next will be a public workshop on May 18 at 6:00pm at the Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility. Finally, there will be a final wrap-up presentation for the week’s efforts and the overall project at the Transportation Commission meeting on May 19 at 6:00pm at Edina City Hall. Of these meetings, the May 18 public workshop will be the only meeting where public comments will be taken regarding the Study. Staff from the LHB, Inc. consultant team will lead a brief presentation and final project update to City Council on the Study and its proposed transportation recommendations and solutions. ATTACHMENTS: Description Presentation GRANDVIEW DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION STUDY May 17, 2016 May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina ROLE OF TRANSPORTATION STUDY • Identify needs, challenges, and opportuni- ties based on variable density scenarios • Review, evaluate, and affirm recommenda- tions from the Grandview Framework Plan • Offer specific recommendations, retain- ing the flexibility to respond to unknown challenges and opportunities • Recommend prioritized, phased improve- ments • Recommend improved connections to adjacent neighborhoods; focus on bicycle and pedestrian connections • Analyze motorized travel to guide inter- section and roadway modifications identi- fied in the Development Framework • Follow the Living Streets Policy and Imple- mentation Plan guidelines May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina IMAGINE WEEK PROGRESS PHASED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS EDEN V E R N O N 50TH H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 W I L S O N A R C A D I A 49TH N O R M A N D A L E S H E R WO O D 5 0 T H S T W T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 52ND G R A N G E 53 DR LINK H A N KE R SO N D A L E IN TE RLA CH EN GNUOY SUG B R O O K S I D E E D E N A V E T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 G WEIVDNAR 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 N B H W Y 1 0 0 T O E D E N A V E S U M M I T PINEWOOD S B H W Y 1 0 0 T O 5 0 T H S T W W E S T B R OO K SB HWY100 TO VERNON AVE S GRANGE RD TO NB HWY100 G R A ND V I E W H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 BROOKSIDE V E R N O N 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS PED/BIKE CONNECTIONS NEW/ADJUSTED INTERSECTION NO CHANGE 0’100’200’300’ N EDEN V E R N O N 50TH H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 W I L S O N A R C A D I A 49TH N O R M A N D A L E S H E R WO O D 5 0 T H S T W T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 52ND G R A N G E 53 DR LINK H A N KE R SO N D A L E INT ERLA C H E N GNUOY SUG B R O O K S I D E E D E N A V E T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 G WEIVDNAR 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 N B H W Y 1 0 0 T O E D E N A V E S U M M I T PINEWOOD S B H W Y 1 0 0 T O 5 0 T H S T W W E S T B R OO K SB HWY100 TO VERNON AVE S GRANGE RD TO NB HWY100 G R A NDV I E W H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 BROOKSIDE V E R N O N 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS PED/BIKE CONNECTIONS NEW/ADJUSTED INTERSECTION NO CHANGE 0’100’200’300’ N EDEN V E R N O N 50TH H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 W I L S O N A R C A D I A 49TH N O R M A N D A L E S H E R WO O D 5 0 T H S T W T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 52ND G R A N G E 53 DR LINK H A N KE R SO N D A L E INTE RLA CH EN GNUOY SUG B R O O K S I D E E D E N A V E T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 G WEIVDNAR 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 N B H W Y 1 0 0 T O E D E N A V E S U M M I T PINEWOOD S B H W Y 1 0 0 T O 5 0 T H S T W W E S T B R OO K SB HWY100 TO VERNON AVE S GRANGE RD TO NB HWY100 G R A ND V I E W H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 BROOKSIDE V E R N O N 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS PED/BIKE CONNECTIONS NO CHANGE 0’100’200’300’ N NEAR TERM MID TERM LONG TERM • Phased implementation of key elements • Prioritizing safety improvements • Supporting multiple modes • Complementing parcel redevelopment • Progression of ramp reconfiguration May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina IMAGINE WEEK PROGRESS Priorities identified at Public Meeting • Reviewed Existing Conditions • Presented phased system approach • Pin-up review and Q&A Other meetings and events • Transportation Commission meeting • Intercept event at Our Lady of Grace • Intercept boards at Library and Jerry’s Key comments and questions • Support for pedestrian improvements, especially crossings • Add 4-way stop at Benton • Will local traffic back up if free-right turn onto TH100 is gone? • Will controlled intersections back up traffic on Vernon? • Add controlled intersection at Jerry’s/ Walgreens May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina ROLE OF RECOMMEND WEEK Identify preferred solutions for the transportation network • Refinement of phased approach • Deeper focus on key solutions • Confirmation of the impact of proposed change • Implementation planning Four action-packed days will include: • Design team charette • Field visits • Public/Alumni Workshop • City Council Meeting • Transportation Commission Meeting May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina SOLUTIONS AND SCENARIOS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS VE R N O N HW Y 1 0 0 EDEN AR C A D I A 53rd 50th GR A N G E I N T E R L A C H E N 52nd SH E R W O O D GRANDVIEW SQUARE Jerry’s Comm. Center/ Redevel- opment LONG TERM City Hall May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina SOLUTIONS AND SCENARIOS CHANGES SINCE IMAGINE WEEK HW Y 1 0 0 VERNON EDEN 50th GR A N G E HIGHWAY 100 RAMP CONFIGURATION ED EN V E R N O N 50TH H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 W I L S O N A R C A D I A 49TH N O R M A N D A L E S H E R WO O D 5 0 T H S T W T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 52ND G R A N G E 53 DR LINK H A N KE R SO N D A L E IN T E RLA C H E N GNUOY SUG B R O O K S I D E E D E N A V E T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 G WEIVDNAR 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 N B H W Y 1 0 0 T O E D E N A V E S U M M I T PINEWOOD S B H W Y 1 0 0 T O 5 0 T H S T W W E S T B R OO K SB HWY100 TO VE RN ON AVE S GRANGE RD TO NB HWY100 G R A ND V I E W H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 BROOKSIDE V E R N O N 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULARCIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OF REDUNDANTROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVEDINTERSECTION * Remove unsafe segment of road Free-right turn replaced with controlled intersection onto Highway 100 northbound Remove looping ramps Integrate highway ramp circulation with district street network IMAGINE WEEK DIAGRAMSUPDATED PLAN E DE N V E R N O N 50TH H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 W I L S O N A R C A D I A 49TH N O R M A N D A L E S H E R WO O D 5 0 T H S T W T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 52ND G R A N G E 53 DR LINK H A N KE R SO N D A L E IN T E R LA C H E N GNUOY SUG B R O O K S I D E E D E N A V E T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 G WEIVDNAR 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 N B H W Y 1 0 0 T O E D E N A V E S U M M I T PINEWOOD S B H W Y 1 0 0 T O 5 0 T H S T W W E S T B R OO K SB HW Y100 TO VERN O N AV E S GRANGE RD TO NB HWY100 G R A ND V I E W H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 BROOKSIDE V E R N O N 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map A B Z IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULARCIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OFREDUNDANT ROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVEDINTERSECTION *A B Z Options for new highway ramps MID TERM LONG TERM May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina SOLUTIONS AND SCENARIOS CHANGES SINCE IMAGINE WEEK 53RD/VERNON INTERSECTION VER N O N EDEN 53rd SH E R W O O D GRANDVIEW SQUARE 52nd E D E N V E R N O N 50TH H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 W I L S O N A R C A D I A 49TH N O R M A N D A L E S H E R WO O D 5 0 T H S T W T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 52ND G R A N G E 53 DR LINK H A N KE R SO N D A L E INT E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG B R O O K S I D E E D E N A V E T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 G WEIVDNAR 50THST W TONBHWY1 0 0 N B H W Y 1 0 0 T O E D E N A V E S U M M I T PINEWOOD S B H W Y 1 0 0 T O 5 0 T H S T WWESTBROOK S B H W Y1 0 0 T O VE R N O N A V E S GR ANGE RD TO NB HWY100 G R A ND V I E W H I G H W A Y 1 0 0BROOKSIDE V E R N O N 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULAR CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT ROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVED INTERSECTION *IMAGINE WEEK DIAGRAM New intersection at 52nd Eliminate link New intersection at 53rd New connection to Jerry’s UPDATED PLAN May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina SOLUTIONS AND SCENARIOS CHANGES SINCE IMAGINE WEEK PARKING RAMP VE R N O N EDEN RA I R L R O A D T R A C K 52nd DRIVEWAY IMAGINE WEEK DIAGRAMUPDATED PLAN E D E N V E R N O N 50TH H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 W I L S O N A R C A D I A 49TH N O R M A N D A L E S H E R WO O D 5 0 T H S T W T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 52ND G R A N G E 53 DR LINK H A N KE R SO N D A L E I N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG B R O O K S I D E E D E N A V E T O S B H W Y 1 0 0 G WEIVDNAR 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 N B H W Y 1 0 0 T O E D E N A V E S U M M I T PINEWOOD S B H W Y 1 0 0 T O 5 0 T H S T W W E S T B R OO K S B H W Y1 0 0 T O VE R N O N A V E S GR ANGE RD TO NB HWY100 G R A ND V I E W H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 BROOKSIDE V E R N O N 5 0 T H S T W T O N B H W Y 1 0 0 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULAR CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT ROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVED INTERSECTION * New intersection at Jerry’s New access to ramp New pedestrian connection May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina NEXT STEPS FINAL STUDY REPORT • June/July 2016 • Review by staff • Review by Transportation Commission • Review by City Council May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina SOLUTIONS AND SCENARIOS REFINEMENTS SINCE IMAGINE WEEK VERNON May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina SOLUTIONS AND SCENARIOS REFINEMENTS SINCE IMAGINE WEEK EDEN May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina SOLUTIONS AND SCENARIOS REFINEMENTS SINCE IMAGINE WEEK ARCADIA AND OTHER INTERNAL STREETS May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Mike Fischer, AIA, LHB Project Principal LHB Lydia Major, ASLA Project Manager Primary Consultant Team Nelson\Nygaard Zabe Bent, Principal Iain Banks, PTP Alta Planning + Design Colin Harris, PE, LEED AP, Engineer Background City of Edina Mark Nolan, AICP Transportation Planner Stakeholders Vision May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina PROJECT HISTORY GRANDVIEW DISTRICT SMALL AREA GUIDE PROCESS GRANDVIEW DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PUBLIC WORKS SITE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT GRANDVIEW DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION STUDY 7 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1. Leverage publically owned parcels 2. Meet the needs of businesses and residents 3. Turn barriers into opportunities 4. Pursue logical increments; make vibrant, walkable, and attractive 5. Organize parking; provide convenience 6. Improve movement for all ages and modes 7. Identity and unique sense of place 3 PRIMARY GOALS 1. Create a place with a unique identity announced by signature elements 2. Completely rethink and reorganize the District’s transportation infrastructure 3. Leverage public resources to make incremental value-increasing changes that enhance the public realm and encourage voltuntary private investment CURRENT DEVELOPMENT SCHEME 1. Residential – 170 units 2. Civic building – 60,000 SF 3. Restaurant and retail – 8,000 SF 4. Park and Ride – 100 spaces 5. Site parking – 643 spaces PROJECT GOALS 1. Identify needs, challenges, and opportunities 2. Review, evaluate, and affirm previously recommended changes 3. Offer specific recommendations, retaining the flexibility to respond to unknown challenges and opportunities 4. Recommend prioritized, phased improvements 5. Recommend improved connections to adjacent neighborhoods; focus on bicycle and pedestrian connections 6. Analyze motorized travel to guide intersection and roadway modifications 7. Follow the Living Streets Policy and Implementation Plan guidelines EDINA’S LIVING STREETS 20132012 20152010 May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina CONVENE WEEK PROGRESS Priorities identified at Public Meeting • Consider all modes of movement • Incorporate Complete Streets • Reconnect zones within district for all modes • Transit • Bus routes and access • Advocacy for Park and Ride • Consider commuter rail • Pedestrian experience • Enhance both safety and routing • Improve experience • Motorists • District parking strategy • Reorganize highway ramps • Explore street and intersection configurations • Consider through-traffic and to-traffic May 17, 2016 Grandview District Transportation Study, City of Edina CONVENE WEEK PROGRESS Identified 4 scenarios for analysis • Existing conditions • New development at Edina Compre- hensive Plan levels • 30 housing units per developable acre • 1.5 FAR (Floor Area Ratio) • New development at Grandview Frame- work levels • Incorporates Former Public Works Site development density • 60 housing units per developable acre • 2.0 FAR • New development with a Highway 100 Grandview Green • 120 housing units per developable acre Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:April Speak Up, Edina Presentation Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No Action Requested. INTRODUCTION: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. Since January 2014, organized monthly discussions have been held on the site. The April 2016 discussion focused on Centennial Lakes Park's Farmers Market. In June, the Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market will kick off its seventh season. The weekly market allows consumers to purchase directly from farmers, growers and producers, ensuring a high level of freshness and quality. Approximately three dozen vendors set up along the walkways outside Hughes Pavilion and sell items such as fruits, vegetables, meats, jams, honey, cheeses, breads, confections and more. The Market will be held 3-7 p.m. Thursday June 16 to Sept. 29, 2016. The City asked the following questions: Do you visit and buy products at the Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market? How often do you visit? Do you search for and buy specific items or visit to browse? What do you think of the quality and selection of products available from vendors? Are there any types of products or vendors that you think should be added or explored that aren't currently available at the Market? Please explain. The discussion was open for comments between March 31 and May 9. During that time, 7 comments were made (plus two on Facebook). Additionally, 528 users visited the site 659 times, garnering 2,232 page views. All commenters in this discussion were from Edina. ATTACHMENTS: Description Comments City of Edina Home Discussions Forums Ideas Meetings Surveys Language Sign In Sign Up × Sign In Email email address... Password password... or, Sign In with: Connect Sign Up Sign In Tweet 0 This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market In June, the Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market will kickoff its seventh season. The weekly market allows consumers to purchase directly from farmers, growers and producers, ensuring a high level of freshness and quality. Approximately three dozen vendors set up along the walkways outside Hughes Pavilion and sell items such as fruits, vegetables, meats, jams, honey, cheeses, breads, confections and more. The Market is held 37 p.m. Thursday June 16 to Sept. 29, 2016. 3 Topics 7 Answers Closed 20160509 View Discussion Topic: Visiting the Market Do you visit and buy products at the Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market? How often do you visit? Do you search for and buy specific items or visit to browse? 6 Responses 6 Responses Jenny OBrien about 1 month ago Every year I think, this is the year I'm going to visit the Farmers Market after work. And then ... I'm usually home and settled in before I realize it's Thursday and the market is closed or winding down. I've lived in the area for more than 10 years and have never been to the Farmers Market. I think it would be very handy to be able to sign up to get a text reminder (email would be my second choice) each Thursday that says "Hey, it's Thursday. Are you visiting the Farmers Market today?" or something along those lines. If the city wanted to expand that thought, specific items that are in season or are currently being offered could be mentioned, etc., but even the simplest of reminders might drive more traffic your way. Thanks. 3 Supports 0Like Share comment... Reply to Jenny O'Brien Joel Stegner, Community volunteer about 1 month ago I am like your first respondent. While I have a community garden plot at Yorktown, love fresh vegetables and live in the SE quadrant of the city, I don't get down there on a regular basis. I like the Promenade and the walking path around Centennial Lakes, but I feel like parking anywhere to get access to the paths, is not optimal and I'm not really willing to deal with the traffic congestion of France unless I really have a good reason to go down there. I think that Farmer's markets with convenient access, good parking and regular hours are going to get the most business. As the small farmer's market next to Fairview Southdale is within 3 blocks of where I live, it is a more practical option. However, the farmer's market there draws on all the immediate neighborhood, which has many, many apartments and townhouses, so I'm glad that it is there, even if I'm unlikely to use it. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Joel Stegner Peggy Keeler about 1 month ago I have been there and enjoyed some of the products. But I would rather eat ORGANIC fruits and vegetables so I do not buy their conventionally grown foods. I would really love to buy fresh organic produce there. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Peggy Keeler Elizabeth x about 1 month ago Nope. I figure if I want to go to a farmer's market I will go to the Minneapolis one. (Probably 46 times/year) The only other nearby farmer's market I go to is the Fulton Farmers Market. The Thursday thing is not useful unless you work at Centennial Lakes, I suppose. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Elizabeth x Jennifer Hennemuth about 1 month ago I like the idea of the local farmer market and would much prefer to visit a local one than go all the way downtown. Like the first person, I forget all about it, however, and have never attended. Some type of additional advertisement or notification would be great. Even signs on the corner of the intersections on France would be a helpful reminder when driving by the area. I'm not sure if there have ever been any signs, but I don't recall seeing any in the past. Or banners along France street lights advertising summer events such as the farmers market similar to those posted when the art fair occurs in June might be a good idea. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jennifer Hennemuth Bill Strait about 1 month ago I live and work on Centennial Lakes. I usually stop by the farmers market on my way home every week and drop about half of my grocery budget there. There's a guy who does cheese that I love, and the meat and bread options are great. I've gotten in to making mead this year, so I may be spending a bit more time around the honey booth this summer. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Bill Strait Sign Up Connect email address... Sign Up Participants Ideas In Action Remove bushes on 42nd St. concealing Weber Park Portable "Path Flooded" Sign at Bredesen Path Flooded Sign at Bredesen Park Edina just hired someone to represent existing residents who are dealing with redevelopment issues...we need someone to help new entrants deal with harassment. Bike Lanes City of Edina Home Discussions Forums Ideas Meetings Surveys Language Sign In Sign Up × Sign In Email email address... Password password... or, Sign In with: Connect Sign Up Sign In Tweet 0 This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market In June, the Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market will kickoff its seventh season. The weekly market allows consumers to purchase directly from farmers, growers and producers, ensuring a high level of freshness and quality. Approximately three dozen vendors set up along the walkways outside Hughes Pavilion and sell items such as fruits, vegetables, meats, jams, honey, cheeses, breads, confections and more. The Market is held 37 p.m. Thursday June 16 to Sept. 29, 2016. 3 Topics 7 Answers Closed 20160509 View Discussion Topic: Quality What do you think of the quality and selection of products available from vendors? 0 Responses 0 Responses Sign Up Connect email address... Sign Up Participants 0Like Share City of Edina Home Discussions Forums Ideas Meetings Surveys Language Sign In Sign Up × Sign In Email email address... Password password... or, Sign In with: Connect Sign Up Sign In Tweet 0 This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market In June, the Centennial Lakes Park Farmers Market will kickoff its seventh season. The weekly market allows consumers to purchase directly from farmers, growers and producers, ensuring a high level of freshness and quality. Approximately three dozen vendors set up along the walkways outside Hughes Pavilion and sell items such as fruits, vegetables, meats, jams, honey, cheeses, breads, confections and more. The Market is held 37 p.m. Thursday June 16 to Sept. 29, 2016. 3 Topics 7 Answers Closed 20160509 View Discussion Topic: New Products or Vendors Are there any types of products or vendors that you think should be added or explored that aren't currently available at the Market? Please explain. 1 Responses 1 Responses Bill Strait about 1 month ago I might be the only person in this demographic, but I'd like to see more modern financial vendors there. I believe a regional bank has a booth, but what about Square, Dwolla, or Bitcoin? I feel like the many of the vendors would benefit from nontraditional payment methods and it might help reduce the price and wait times for consumers. (Full disclosure, I sometimes sell small amounts of bitcoin to people.) 0 Supports 0Like Share Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2016-06 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Regarding Scoreboards Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Waive second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2016-06 regarding scoreboards. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2016-06 Planning Commission Staff Report April 27, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2016-06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING SCOREBOARD REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article XIII. Division 5, Section 36-1711 is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1711. – R-1, R-2 and PRD-1 Districts The following signs are permitted in the R-1, R-2 and PRD-1 districts: Type Maximum Number Maximum Area Maximum Height A. Nameplate or address One per dwelling unit 2 square feet 6 feet B. Building identification (churches, schools, golf courses, pubic facilities only) Wall 1 per building 24 square feet N/A Freestanding 1 per frontage 36 square feet 8 feet C. Area identification One per development 24 square feet 6 feet D. Public park identification One per frontage 24 square feet 6 feet E. Scoreboards: 1. Field No. 1 Courtney Field & Kuhlman Stadium One 400 550 square feet (including sponsor panels) 20 30 feet 2. Van Valkenburg Park, Kuhlman Field and Braemar Park except Field No. 1 at Courtney Fields One per field 200 square feet (including sponsor panels) 20 feet 3. All other public parks, schools and golf courses One per field 100 square feet 20 feet F. Public park scoreboard sponsor panels and other scoreboard advertising 25% of scoreboard area Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor V. Public Hearings B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Scoreboards at Kuhlman Stadium and Courtney Field Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Edina Public Schools is requesting an amendment to the City’s Sign Ordinance to build a new scoreboard at Kuhlman Stadium. The proposed sign is 544 total square feet in size including the advertising panel (25% allowed). Continuing, Teague explained that the current Ordinance allows a scoreboard to be no more than 200 square feet and staff recommended that a Zoning Ordinance Amendment rather than a large Variance request accommodate the new scoreboard. Planner Teague shared photos of the size of neighboring communities’ school scoreboards: • Burnsville 1,350 s.f. • Eden Prairie 1,432 s.f. • Wayzata 950 s.f. • Minnetonka 1,000 s.f. Planner Teague concluded that based on the comparison of similar scoreboards at similar sized schools, staff recommends the Ordinance changes as proposed. Appearing for the School District Troy Stein Applicant Comments Mr. Stein addressed the Commission and explained that the proposed sign will be digital LED, adding the sign will be able to display results for all sports. Stein asked the Commission for their support. Discussion/Comments • Mr. Stein was asked if the logo “hornet” is lit. Mr. Stein informed the Commission the hornet would be illuminated only during games. • A question was raised if the sponsorship raceways could display the sponsors more uniformly and not “all over the board”. It was noted that sponsors would be displayed along the “raceways” without uniformity. A sponsor’s logo would be permitted. Motion Motion was made by Commission Carr to recommend that the City Council approve the amending the Ordinance based on Staff findings presented in the staff report. The motion was seconded by Commission Thorsen. All voted aye. The motion carried. Chair Platteter asked Mr. Stein when the District proposes to have the sign up. Mr. Stein responded their goal is to have it up and running by fall. VI. Community Comment None VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Platteter acknowledged receipt of the Attendance and Council Connection. VII. Chair and Member Comments Commissioner Lee commented that she feels it is very useful to receive project memo’s from the Engineering Department and questioned if it would be possible to get feedback from the Transportation Commission (especially for the Southdale area) when we are reviewing plans. Continuing, Lee said she feels there is a gap, adding she is not sure of the Transportation Commissions role. Chair Platteter informed Commissioners that he believes a decision was made (before his time) by the Council to eliminate the Transportation Commission from the planning project process. Platteter said when an formal application is filed both the applicant and City work under a timeline established by the Legislature. Platteter said he believes at one time both the Transportation and Planning Commissions reviewed proposals; however, it became a long difficult process under a time line. The question got to be about the public hearing process. By statute the Planning Commission holds the public hearings. If a development proposal was required to go before the Transportation Commission with notification the public hearing process became cumbersome and the VIII. Staff Comments Planner Teague informed Commission they are invited to attend a work session with the City Council on May 17th. Mic Johnson, Southdale Area Plan Process will present findings to the City Council. Teague said the work session is not mandatory; just an invite. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2016-55 Adding Edina Heritage Landmark District Zoning Designation to Wooddale Bridge No. 90646 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution which adds the Edina Heritage Landmark District zoning designation to the Wooddale Bridge No. 90646 INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report and supporting documentation. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report - Wooddale Bridge Resolution No. 2016-55 Wooddale Bridge - Nomination Study & Plan of Treatment Wooddale Bridge - National Register of Historic Places Application Form MN Historical Society Letter 2-12-16 re: Nat. Reg. Designation April 13, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes December 8, 2015 Heritage Preservation Board Minutes MNDOT Local Historic Bridge Report - June 2014 EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARK NOMINATION STUDY & PLAN OF TREATMENT WOODDALE BRIDGE No. 90646 Prepared by Robert C. Vogel Preservation Planning Consultant INTRODUCTION This report documents the historic Wooddale Bridge for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark. It identifies and locates the heritage resource, explains how it meets the heritage landmark eligibility criteria, and presents a plan of treatment for the property. In general, the city heritage preservation program has adopted the conventions and terminology of the National Register of Historic Places in its documentation of Edina Heritage Landmarks. Once a property is rezoned as a heritage landmark by the City Council, the plan of treatment contained in the nomination report becomes the official site preservation plan. The subject property is owned and maintained by the City of Edina. It has been assigned number 90646 in the national bridge inventory maintained by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The historic bridge was determined eligible for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark by the Heritage Preservation Board in 2008. In 2015 the bridge was nominated to the National Register of Historic Places. The National Register nomination documents were reviewed by the Edina Heritage Preservation Board, which concurred with the preparer's findings of historical significance and integrity. (The Edina Heritage Landmark and the National Register programs use the same eligibility criteria.) DESCRIPTION The Wooddale Bridge carries Wooddale Avenue (County Road 150) over Minnehaha Creek (mile 10.4), a short distance upstream from St. Stephen the Martyr Episcopal Church. It carries two lanes of vehicular traffic on a north-south alignment. The bridge is a single-span corrugated multi-plate arch structure. The bridge is 21.0 feet long, with a span length of 18.0 feet and an out-and-out width of 40.4 feet. The steel plate arch is supported by cast-in-place concrete spread footings and the headwalls, railings and wing walls are faced with locally quarried Platteville limestone rubble. A builder's plaque inscribed "WPA 1937" is located on the downstream parapet wall. The historic structure is in good condition and has had very little alteration since it was erected in 1937. A detailed narrative description of the historic structure is presented in Section 7 of the National Register registration form (see attached). Copies of the original construction documents are on file in the city engineer's office. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE The Wooddale Bridge was built in 1937 under the auspices of the U.S. Works Progress Administration (1937). It was designed by W. E. Duckett, the Hennepin County highway engineer. The multi-plate steel arch was fabricated by the Lyle Pipe & Culvert Co. The construction was financed in part with federal aid funds administered by the Minnesota State Highway Department. Evaluated from the perspective of the local historic contexts, "Minnehaha Creek" and "Federal Relief Construction," the Wooddale Bridge has been determined eligible for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark on the basis of its historical and engineering values. The property derives its significance under Edina Heritage Landmark eligibility criterion A from its association with Federal relief construction in Edina and the development of transportation infrastructure along Minnehaha Creek. It also qualifies under eligibility criterion C as an outstanding, well preserved specimen of multi-plate masonry arch bridge construction. The property retains historic integrity of the essential physical features required to convey its historical and engineering significance. A more detailed and fully annotated narrative dealing with the subject property's preservation values from the perspective of engineering and bridge construction history is presented in Section 8 of the National Register registration form (see attached). The National Register nomination specifically references the statement of historic contexts, associated property types, and property type registration requirements delineated in the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form titled, "Federal Relief Construction in Minnesota, 1933-1941," which was used by the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office as the basis for its evaluation of the Wooddale Bridge. The National Register nomination was prepared by The 106 Group Ltd. for the Cultural Resources Unit of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES • Armco Culvert Manufacturers Association. Lifetime Armco Multi-Plate for Bridges, Culverts, Large Drains. Middletown, Ohio, 1934. • The Crier [newspaper published for Edina Country Club District residents]. May, July and September, 1937. • Edina Village Council Minutes, 1936-1937. City of Edina. PLAN OF TREATMENT The City of Edina has adopted the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties as the authoritative guide for design review decisions involving properties designated as Edina Heritage Landmarks. The following general guidelines address specific preservation treatment requirements of the Wooddale Bridge: 1. The historic bridge will be preserved in place and the existing form, integrity and materials of the structure shall be maintained. 2. The general treatment strategy applied to design review for Certificates of Appropriateness shall be rehabilitation, defined as the process of maintaining the bridge in a state of utility through repairs and minor alterations which make possible an efficient contempormy use while preserving those features which are significant to its historical and engineering values. 3. The distinguishing physical characteristics of the bridge and its environment should not be substantially altered or destroyed as a result of any action taken by the city. Careful consideration should be given to preventing damage from flooding or bank erosion. 4. The removal or alteration of significant historic character defining features should be avoided whenever possible. Repair and replacement of deteriorated features should be based on accurate duplications of the original work, based on historical, pictorial or physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of modern materials. Page 2 of 3 5. Retain the original limestone masonry, whenever possible, repointing only those mortar joints where there is evidence of deterioration; duplicate the old mortar in composition, color, texture, joint size and profile. 6. Reconstruction of damaged masonry railings, head walls and wing walls should be kept to a minimum and the new work should be designed to be compatible in materials, size, scale, color and texture with the original stone work. 7. Necessary signs, lighting, fencing and walkways should be designed to be compatible with the historic character of the bridge and its environment. These installations should be carried out in such a manner that if the new work was to be removed, the essential form and integrity of the historic structure would be unimpaired. 8. Recognize the special problems inherent in the bridge's alignment and structural systems when complying with traffic safety and engineering requirements so that the essential character of the historic structure is preserved intact. 9. Investigate alternative traffic safety measures that preserve the structure's historic integrity. The City will make every effort to retain the historic bridge as a functional part of the modern transportation system while preserving its distinguishing original qualities. 10. In the event that the historic bridge can no longer be preserved in place for reasons of public safety, the preferred treatment strategy shall be mitigation by relocation to another location where it can be preserved and repurposed. If relocation is not feasible, the effects of demolition may be mitigated by historical and engineering documentation with measured drawings, large-format negative photographs, and written data which meet the standards of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). Approved by the Edina Heritage Preservation Board on December 8, 2015. Page 3 of 3 ' rorM W-VUU UIVlb "IULti-UU'It5 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Bridge No, 90646 Other names/site number: Wooddale Avenue Bridge Name of related multiple listing: "Iron & Steel Bridges in MN, 1873-1945" (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) 2. Location Street & number: Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek; 5000 block of Wooddale Avenue City or town: Edina State: MN County: Hennepin Not for publication: N/A Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official Date Title: State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government Sections 1-6 page 1 1N/A United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State 4. National Park Certification I, hereby, certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) Signature of the Keeper Date of Action 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes ras Tply) Private Public - Local Public - State Public - Federal Category of Property (Check only one box) Building(s) District Site Structure X X Sections 1-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing buildings sites structures obj ects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register N/A 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) TRANSPORTATION/road-related (vehicular) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) TRANSPORTATION/road-related (vehicular) 1 1 Sections 1-6 page 3 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) OTHER: Multi Plate arch Materials: (Enter categories from instructions.) Principal exterior materials of the property: METAL: Steel STONE: Limestone CONCRETE OTHER Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, type, style, method of construction, setting, size, and significant features. Indicate whether the property has historic integrity.) Summary Paragraph The Wooddale Avenue Bridge, identified as National Bridge Inventory Number 90646, is a single-span, Multi Plate arch bridge that is faced with Platteville limestone. The bridge has a structure length of 21.0 feet, a span length of 18.0 feet, and an out-and-out width of 40.4 feet. The bridge was constructed by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) in 1937 and carries Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek in Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Narrative Description Bridge No. 90646 is a single-span, Multi Plate arch bridge that carries Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek in Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The bridge is located in the northeast part of Edina, 230 feet south of the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and West 50th Street, and a half-mile east of Trunk Highway 100. The Edina County Club golf course is located directly west of the bridge and St. Stephens Episcopal Church is located directly east of the bridge. The bridge is oriented in a north-south alignment over Minnehaha Creek. At this location the creek is narrow and rocky, and has sloped banks which are covered with dense growth of small trees and shrubs. The bridge has a structure length of 21.0 feet, a span length of 18.0 feet, and an out-and-out width of 40.4 feet. Section 7 page 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State The superstructure of Bridge No. 90646 consists of abutments on the north and south ends of the bridge, which anchor the structure into the sloped banks of Minnehaha Creek. The abutments are constructed of reinforced- concrete with Platteville limestone facing. Engaged pilasters, faced in Platteville limestone, project slightly from the abutments. The non-load bearing closed spandrels on the bridge are constructed of reinforced-concrete and are faced with Platteville limestone. The rock-faced, coursed limestone has raked mortar joints. The voussoir stones are rectangular-shaped and are applied perpendicular to the arch. The voussoirs increase in height closer to the center of the arch where an elongated keystone marks the middle. The semi-circular arch and barrel are constructed of Armco Multi Plate corrugated steel plates which are bolted together. The plates of the arch have corrugations 6.0 inches wide and 1.5 inches deep. The arch carries the load of the span. An insulated sewer pipe runs longitudinally through the arch. Short limestone retaining walls extend upstream and downstream from the imposts. The bridge's spandrel walls extend above the deck to form the railing. The engaged pilasters also extend above the deck forming the railing end posts. The solid railings are slightly arched and are topped with a thin limestone cap that overhangs the width of the railings. The cap features horizontal, narrow limestone pieces interspersed through the cap that slightly rise above the height of the cap. Beyond the endposts are short sections of railing that extend along the approach spans. At both ends of the west railing, only the base of these extensions remains. The deck is 40.4 feet wide and carries a 31.0 foot wide roadway that has a bituminous wearing surface applied over earth fill. A concrete sidewalk extends along the east side of the roadway. A plaque inscribed with "WPA 1937" is located on the inside of the south end of the eastern railing. Integrity Since its construction in 1937, Bridge No. 90646 has remained in its original location, carrying Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek. The setting is relatively unchanged, as much of the area was developed before and simultaneously with the bridge. As such, Bridge No. 90646 retains excellent integrity of location and setting. The bridge has remained relatively unaltered since its construction, with the replacement of the bituminous wearing surface; a feature that is designed to be replaced, and the loss of the upper portions of the railing extensions on the western railing being the only notable changes to the structure. The bridge exhibits some minor deterioration, including rusting of the bolt connections on the steel arch, spalling and expansion of the Platteville limestone, and deterioration of portions of the parapet walls; however, this has not altered the original design of the bridge or its character-defining features. As such, the bridge retains excellent integrity of design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Section 7 page 5 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing.) X A. patterns of our history. Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad B. Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. X C. Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. D. Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply) A. Owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B. Removed from its original location. C. A birthplace or grave. D. A cemetery. E. A reconstructed building, object, or structure. F. A commemorative property. G. Less than 50 years old or achieving significance within the past 50 years. Section 8 page 6 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) POLITICS/GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING Period of Significance 1937 Significant Dates 1937 Significant Person (Complete only if Criterion B is marked above) N/A Cultural Affiliation N/A Architect/Builder Fabricator: Lyle Pipe & Culvert Co. Builder: Works Progress Administration Designer: Duckett, W. E. Section 8 page 7 14 Minnesota Historical Society Using the Power of History to Transform Lives PRESERVING SHARING CONNECTING February 12, 2016 The Honorable James Hovland Mayor of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: Bridge No. 90646, (Wooddale Avenue Bridge) Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek, Edina, Hennepin County Dear Mayor Hovland: I am pleased and honored to congratulate you upon the entry of Bridge No, 90646 in the National Register of Historic Places. The National Register, as you know, is a listing of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects considered to be worthy of preservation. An information sheet describing the program is enclosed. The property was listed on February 2, 2016. By recognizing the significance of your property and planning for its preservation you are participating In a national movement which aims to preserve, for the benefit of future generations, our cultural heritage. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Denis Gardner, National Register Historian, at 651-259-3451, denis.gardner@mnhs.org or 345 Kellogg Blvd. W., St. Paul, MN 55102. Again, congratulations on receiving this important designation. Sincerely, Barbara Mitchell Howard Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Enclosures: National Register Program cc: Mr. Ryan Weber, Chair, Edina Heritage Preservation Board, 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, A2400 Government Center, 300 S. 6th St., Minneapolis, MN 55404 President, Hennepin History Museum, 2303 Third Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55404 President, Edina Historical Society, 4711 W. 70th St., Edina, MN 55431 Ms. Kelli Andre Kellerhall, The 106 Group, 1295 Bandana Blvd. N. #335, St. Paul, MN 55108 Mr. Greg Mathis, MnDOT, 395 John Ireland Blvd., Mail Stop 620, St. Paul, MN 55155 Minnesota Historical Society, 345 Kellogg Boulevard West, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 651-259-3000 • 888-727-8386 • www.mnhs.org Draft Minutes LI Approved Minutes111 Approved Date: 4/27/2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers April 13, 2016, 7:00 P.M. I. Call To Order Chair Platteter called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering the Roll were Chair Platteter, Commissioners Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Kivimaki, Ma, Nemerov, Olsen, Carr, Hamilton Staff Present, Cary Teague, Joyce Repya, Jackie Hoogenakker III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the April 13, 2016, meeting agenda. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the March 23, 2016 meeting minutes. Motion seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Commissioner Nemerov offered a correction. The correction was accepted. All voted aye. The motion carried with the correction by Nemerov. V. Public Hearing A. Site Plan Review with Variances and Subdivision. 6600 York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Noble Investments is proposing to develop the northeast corner of the Southdale site with a four-story, 146-room Hilton hotel. Teague explained to accommodate the request building setback variances from 49 to 14-24-feet on York Avenue and 48 to 21to 46- pg. 1 Draft MinutesO Approved MinutesO Approved Date: 4/27/2016 Continuing Repay asked the Commission to note that at this time the bridge is in need of renovation and working with the Engineering Division an RFP was requested to replace the wing walls along the creek bed along with other corrections. Repya shared with Commissioners a video from "Agenda Edina" highlighting the history of the bridge and its significance. Repya concluded that she is seeking a recommendation from the Commission to the City Council designating the Wooddale Bridge for the Edina Heritage Landmark Overlay Zoning (EHL). Comments from the Commission Commissioners applauded locally designating the Wooddale Bridge as an Edina Heritage Landmark. It was also noted that the materials used on the bridge are difficult to maintain for many reasons; one being the use of salt on the bridge which is corrosive to the limestone. It was suggested that reducing the use of salt on the bridge and considering another approach could be of benefit; however, safety comes first. Repya agreed that the bridge is fragile and the designation along with a plan of treatment would be a positive step in maintaining the bridge in a historically safe manner. Motion Motion was made by Thorsen to recommend that the City Council add Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) Overlay Zoning designation to the Wooddale Bridge. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Olsen. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Sketch Plan Review. 4528 & 4530 France Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the properties at 4528 & 4530 France Avenue. Teague asked the Commission to note that the proposed sketch plan is generally similar with a sketch plan that was reviewed and generally well received in 2011; however, was not acted on. Continuing, Teague explained when the applicant returns with a formal application they would be requesting a rezoning with variances from PCD-1 and PCD-4 (Planned Commercial District) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). pg. 7 Draft MinutesO Approved Minutes LI Approved Date: 4/27/2016 • Sections 7. Corrects an error in the sign regulations table. Teague concluded his presentation. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Olsen. All voted aye. The motion carried. It was suggested that the Commission periodically review the Code for "clean up", etc. Motion Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to amend the Code as indicated. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Hobbs. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Community Comment John Crabtree, 5408 Oaklawn Avenue. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Add Edina Heritage Landmark Overlay Zoning Designation to the Wooddale Bridge Planner Presentation Planner Repya informed the Commission that on February 12, 2016, the Minnesota Historical Society announced that the historic Wooddale Bridge was added to the National Register of Historic Places. Repya commented that this was an honor and explained that in 2008 the bridge was added to the list of Edina properties eligible for local designation. Repya reported that the bridge has significance supporting local designation because the bridge was constructed in 1937 by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) that was part of a federal relief project. Repya added that with local designation a plan of treatment would be drafted for the bridge. pg. 6 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room December 8, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Weber called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Weber and Members Moore, McLellan, Sussman, O'Brien, Birdman, Kelly, Pearson and Student Members Otness and Puerzer. Absent was Member Christiaansen. HPB Staff Liaison - Senior Planner, Joyce Repya; and Preservation Consultant, Robert Vogel were also in attendance. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Member Birdman to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Member McLellan. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES November 10, 2015 Motion was made by Member Birdman to approved the November 10, 2015 HPB meeting minutes. Motion seconded by Member McLellan. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT - None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. Wooddale Bridge - Nomination Study & Plan of Treatment Planner Repya explained that the Wooddale Bridge over Minnehaha Creek, just south of W. 50th Street is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission and City Council in 2016 to finalize its Edina Heritage Landmark Designation. The proposed nomination study and plan of treatment provided for the board's review and adoption will serve as a guide for the City and the HPB to protect it into the future. • Board members discussed looking into procuring a plaque for the bridge recognizing its historic significance to the community. Motion was made by Member O'Brien to approve the nomination study and plan of treatment for the Wooddale Bridge. Motion was seconded by Member Moore. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Historic Contexts Study Update Consultant Vogel presented the updated Historic Contexts Study outline, pointing out that since the origination of the study in 1999, numerous historic reports and studies have been conducted, and now, the information from those studies has been incorporated into the revised study outline. 1 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report Executive Summary Bridge Number: 90646 Bridge 90646 carries Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek in Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. It is owned by the City of Edina. The bridge was constructed in 1937 by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) as part of a federal relief project to replace an earlier timber stringer bridge at the same location. The bridge is significant for its association with the WPA federal-relief program, its aesthetics, and as a representative example of a multi plate arch bridge in the state. Bridge 90646 is a single-span corrugated multi plate arch structure. The span length is 18 feet. The steel plate arch is supported by cast in place concrete spread footings. The bridge features limestone masonry headwalls, railings and wingwalls. Bridge 90646 is in fair condition and appears to adequately serve its purpose of carrying vehicular and pedestrian traffic. With proper maintenance, stabilization and preservation activities, it is believed Bridge 90646 could continue to serve in its present capacity for 20 years or longer. Any work on Bridge 90646 should proceed according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Standards) [36 CFR part 67] and The Secretary's Standards with Regard to Repair, Rehabilitation, and Replacement Situations, as adapted by the Virginia Transportation Research Council (Guidelines). LUB Mead 6:1 lunt JUNE 2014 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Bridge Number: 90646 Existing Conditions Available information, as detailed in the Project Introduction section, concerning Bridge 90646 was reviewed prior to visiting the bridge site. The site visit was conducted to establish the following: 1. General condition of structure 2. Conformation to available extant plans 3. Current use of structure 4. Roadway/pedestrian trail geometry and alignment (as applicable) 5. Bridge geometry, clearances and notable site issues General Bridge Description: Bridge 90646 is a single-span corrugated multi plate arch structure, about 44 feet in total length. The plate arch span is approximately 18 feet. The steel plate arch is supported by cast in place concrete spread footings. Bridge 90646 carries VVooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek in the City of Edina. The bridge features limestone masonry headwalls, railings and wingwalls. The bituminous-surface roadway is about 32 feet wide, gutter to gutter. There is a 4-foot-wide sidewalk on the east side of the bridge. The railing height varies from 3 feet, 10 inches on the ends to about 4 feet, 5 inches at mid-span. Railings and wingwalls are parallel to the roadway. Remnants of smaller curved stone masonry walls were noted off each end of the existing wingwalls. These walls are somewhat intact on the east side but are missing nearly entirely on the west side. There are also small stone masonry walls present along the stream channel that abut each of the bridge wingwalls. Serviceability Observations: The bridge is currently open to vehicular and pedestrian traffic with no apparent load posting restrictions from legal loads. Condition Observations: Roadway Surface: The existing bituminous roadway is in good condition with no significant deficiencies noted. Bridge Railings: The stone masonry bridge railings are solid limestone masonry capped with limestone slabs. The original bridge plans show timber elements in the railing details, but no timber elements are present at this time. The railings comprise the top level of the masonry headwalls and wingwalls and are about 2 feet thick. The railing height varies along the length of the bridge with the end minimum height at about 3 feet 10 inches, at the ends, and a maximum mid-span height of 4 feet 5 inches. The east rail leans outward about 1 inch in 4 feet. The condition of the existing stone masonry railings is fair to poor. The relatively soft limestone has weathered and deteriorated with nearly all stones cracked, and widespread areas of mortar deterioration, especially on the roadside face of the railings. Crumbled stone and mortar has collected at the base of the railings. The solid limestone slab railing caps are nearly 100 percent deteriorated. LBB Mead lunt JUNE 2014 Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV -9 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Bridge Number: 90646 Bridge Headwalls and Wingwalls: The stone masonry headwalls and wingwalls below the railing are in fair condition. The stone in these areas is in markedly better condition than the railing stones, presumably due to less exposure.to road salts. Widespread deterioration of the mortar was noted. Many areas of the mortar on the headwalls were cracked and de-bonded from the stone. Arch ring stones along the perimeter of the plate arch were in good to fair condition. Alignment and geometry of the headwalls and wingwalls appeared to be true. Steel Multi plate Arch: The galvanized steel multi plate arches are in good condition overall. Though water conditions were relatively high at the time of this site visit, the zinc coating appeared to be in good condition overall. Active corrosion was noted at and near the connection of the ach to the concrete abutments with the most severe being at the southeast corner. Substructures: The substructures are cast in place concrete footings bearing on the native soil. Due to the high water level at the time of the field assessment, access to most of the footings was not possible. Scouring and undermining of the east end of the south footing was noted, about 3 feet in length and 12 inches in depth beneath the bottom of the footing. Approach/Waterway Observations: The bridge approaches appear suitable for the current bridge function with no deficiencies noted other than the presence of a mature tree at the southeast corner that may be affecting the stone masonry wingwalls. The waterway geometry appears to be adequate though the velocity at the time of the field assessment was high. The retaining walls along the channel that abut the bridge wingwalls at the waters edge were noted to be poor condition with undermining and missing stones throughout. Accident Data: There are 27 reported accidents within 500 feet of the bridge site, in the MnMCAT system. The majority of these crashes took place at the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and 5001 Street (a highly traveled roadway). The bridge is not considered a contributing factor to this high number of vehicular accidents. Date of Site Visit: July 31, 2013 Mead , I lunt JUNE 2014 Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV - 10 Bridge Number: 90646 IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Effi Mead • lunt JUNE 2014 Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV - 11 Condition 1: Bridge approach looking north. Condition 2: West elevation looking northeast. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report Bridge Number: 90646 IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations JUNE 2014 Mead lunt Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV- 12 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report Condition 3 Looking north at top of west railing; note deteriorated masonry on the top and at the base of the railing. Condition 4: View of east railing looking south. IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Bridge Number: 90646 JUNE 2014 Mead ' lunt Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV - 13 Condition 5: General view of northeast wingwall. Condition 6: General view of northeast wingwall masonry. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report Bridge Number: 90646 IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Mead lunt JUNE 2014 Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV - 14 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report Condition 7: General corrosion at waterline. Condition 8: Corrosion in southeast corner. LIE Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report IV - Existing Conditions/Recommendations Bridge Number: 90646 Condition 9: Stamp on inside of steel plate arch. LUB Mead hint JUNE 2014 Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV -15 Bridge Number: 90646 IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Mead 1 lunt JUNE 2014 Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV -16 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report Condition 11: Typical east side channel wall (northeast shown). Condition 12: Typical west side channel wall (southwest shown). Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Bridge Number: 90646 Condition 13: Tree growing near southeast corner. IIIB Mead lunt JUNE 2014 Existing ConditionslRecommendations IV - 17 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Bridge Number: 90646 Overall Recommendations: The bridge is currently open to vehicular and pedestrian traffic. The recommendations which follow assume the structure's use will remain the same. Bridge 90646 is not currently load posted. However, the latest rating of the bridge was performed in 1973. The bridge rating is outdated and should be re- evaluated for the current condition of the structure. Costs for this rating have been included in the Preliminary Design and Assessment estimate. Stabilization, preservation, and maintenance activities that could extend the serviceability and overall longevity of the bridge are detailed below. Recommended Stabilization Activities: 1. Remove mature tree in southeast corner. Recommended Preservation Activities: The overall condition of the bridge can be described as fair. While the multi plate arches are in good condition, save for some minor corrosion, the stone masonry on the bridge is in fair to poor condition particularly the railing. Some geometric distortion was noted in the east railing but overall the bridge lines appeared straight and true. An overall preservation plan should be developed to improve the noted deficiencies. Based on our field observations the bridge appears to be nearing a critical point in its lifespan where investment in the near term could significantly delay or prevent accelerated deterioration or loss of the bridge superstructure. The recommended preservation activities are: Bridge Railings: Due to their deteriorated condition, it is recommended to remove and replace the stone masonry railings down to the arch crown elevation. The railing stones are spalled, cracked, and eroded beyond the point of practical salvage. At the time of rehabilitation planning, a detailed study should be conducted to determine the level of repair required and analysis should be conducted to confirm that the current condition of the masonry precludes repair. The estimated costs contained in this report assume that the railings will require reconstruction to the limits described above. The existing original mortar shall be tested to determine its properties. Repointing shall be executed with a mortar that matches the original mortar in color, composition, aggregate size, strength, finish tooling etc. Similarly, the replacement stones selected shall match the original stones in color, origin (if possible) and composition. At the time of rail reconstruction, it is recommended that the four smaller decorative walls off each wingwall at roadway level be reconstructed. Arch, Roadway & Sidewalk: When either the roadway and sidewalk need to be replaced or the arch begins to show signs of corrosion, it is recommended that the sidewalk and bituminous surface be removed and replaced and at the same time, remove the earth fill above the steel multi plate arch and inspect steel surfaces for corrosion. After any corrosion of the top surface is addressed, the fill shall be replaced with clean aggregate and include a LHB Mead • ' lunt JUNE 2014 Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV -18 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report IV — Existing Conditions/Recommendations Bridge Number: 90646 drainage system. Consideration for installation of a waterproofing membrane should also be made. This repair is anticipated to be required in approximately 10 years and has been included in the preservation cost estimate. Bridge Headwalls and Wingwalls: The alignment and condition of the headwalls makes them a very good candidate to be rehabilitated before they deteriorate to the level where replacement is required. Although the stones appear to be severely weathered, it was observed that removal of mortar and repointing of stone masonry on headwalls and wingwalls would be possible with very limited loss of original stones. It will be required to replace those stone that do not hold up to the repointing process (estimate 60 square feet). At the time of rehabilitation planning, a detailed study should be conducted to determine the level of repair required. The existing original mortar shall be tested to determine its properties. Repointing shall be executed with a mortar that matches the original mortar in color, composition, aggregate size, strength, finish tooling etc. Similarly, the replacement stones selected shall match the original stones in color, origin (if possible) and composition. Channel Walls: The stone masonry walls at the channel edge are severely deteriorated and should be reconstructed. As with the railing, headwalls and wingwalls, the decision to replace these historic elements should follow a detailed study and repair or replacement shall follow the same guidelines for selection of replacement stones and mortar. Substructures: It is recommended to underpin the concrete footings to mitigate scour action. Concrete underpin walls placed at the scoured locations shall be designed to be as visually unobtrusive as possible while protecting the footings from continued scour. Recommended Maintenance Activities: 1. Flush bridge roadway, sidewalks, and stone masonry railings, headwalls and wingwalls each spring with water to remove salt residue. When utilizing pressure washer for flushing, maintain pressure low enough to assure it does not abrade/damage existing surface. Perform testing in small areas at initiation of work. Mead lunt JUNE 2014 Existing Conditions/Recommendations IV - 19 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report V — Projected Costs Bridge Number: 90646 Summarized Stabilization and Preservation Construction Cost Estimates: It is important to recognize that the work scope and cost estimates presented herein are based on a limited level assessment of the existing structure. In moving forward with future project planning, it will be essential to undertake a detailed structure assessment addressing the proposed work for the structure. It is also important that any future preservation work follow applicable preservation standards with emphasis to rehabilitate and repair in-place structure elements in lieu of replacement. This includes elements which are preliminarily estimated for replacement within the work scope of this report. Only through a thorough review of rehabilitation and repair options and comprehensive structural and historic assessment can a definitive conclusion for replacement of historic fabric be formed. The opinions of probable construction and administrative costs provided below are presented in 2013 dollars. These costs were developed without benefit of a detailed, thorough bridge inspection, bridge survey or completion of preliminary design for the estimated improvements. The estimated costs represent an opinion based on background knowledge of historic unit prices and comparable work performed on other structures. The opinions of cost are intended to provide a programming level of estimated cost. These costs will require refinement and may require significant adjustments as further analysis is completed in determining the course of action for future structure improvements. A 20% contingency and 7% mobilization allowance has been included in the construction cost estimates. Administrative and engineering costs are also presented below. Engineering and administrative costs are also to be interpreted as programming level only. Costs can be highly variable and are dependent on structure condition, intended work scope, project size and level of investigative, testing and documentation work necessary. Additional studies, evaluation, and historical consultation costs not exclusively called out may also be incurred on a case-by-case basis. Maintenance, Stabilization and Preservation Costs (refer to the work item breakdown on the next page) Opinion of Annual Cost- Maintenance Activities: $ 1,800 Opinion of Construction Cost- Stabilization Activities: $ 2,650 Opinion of Construction Cost- Preservation Activities: $ 494,280 Estimated Preliminary Design, Final Design, Construction Administration Costs Preliminary Design and Assessment $ 12,000 Final Design and Plans $ 45,000 Construction Administration $ 55,000 Mead lunt JUNE 2014 Projected Costs V -20 Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Local Historic Bridge Report V — Projected Costs Bridge Number: 90646 MAINTENANCE, STABILIZATION & PRESERVATION COST ESTIMATE Bridge No. 90646 January 7, 2014 (2013 DOLLARS) ESTIMATED QUANTITIES AND COST ITEM NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE MAINTENANCE COSTS 1 FLUSH STONE MASONRY HEADWALLS AND RAILINGS LUMP SUM 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 20% CONTINGENCY LUMP SUM 1 $300.00 $300.00 ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COSTS $1,800 STABILIZATION COSTS MOBILIZATION @ Pk LUMP SUM 1 $150.00 $150.00 1 REMOVE TREE TREE 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 20% CONTINGENCY LUMP SUM 1 $500.00 $500.00 ESTIMATED STABILIZATION COSTS $2,650 PRESERVATION COSTS MOBILIZATION @ 7% LUMP SUM 1 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 1 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ FT 2175 $4.00 $8,700.00 2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 150 $5.00 $750.00 3 REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALKS SQ FT 450 $3.00 $1,350.00 4 REMOVE MASONRY (RAILINGS) LIN FT 88 $110.00 $9,680.00 5 COMMON EXCAVATION CU YD 450 $12.00 $5,400.00 6 REPLACE EARTH ARCH FILL & ROAD BASE MATERIAL CU YD 450 $26.00 $11,700.00 7 REPLACE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT- TON 70 $110.00 $7,700.00 8 REPLACE CONCRETE SIDEWALKS SQ FT 450 $12.00 $5,400.00 9 REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LIN FT 150 $24.00 $3,600.00 10 UNDERPIN CONCRETE ABUTMENTS LIN FT 25 $1,400.00 $35,000.00 11 RECONSTRUCT STONE MASONRY WALLS (STREAM) SQ YD. 45 $2,200.00 $99,000.00 12 RECONSTRUCT STONE MASONRY WALLS (WING ENDS) SQ YD. 10 $2,500.00 $25,000.00 13 RECONSTRUCT STONE MASONRY RAILINGS SQ YD. 45 $1,200.00 $54,000.00 14 STONE RAILING CAPS LIN FT 88 $700.00 $61,600.00 15 100% REPOINTING OF HEADWALLS AND WINGWALLS SOFT 400 $28.00 $11,200.00 16 STONE MASONRY REPLACEMENT SQ FT 60 $220.00 $13,200.00 17 DRAINAGE SYSTEM LUMP SUM 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 18 WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE SQ FT 1400 $20.00 $28,000.00 20% CONTINGENCY LUMP SUM 1 $83,000.00 $83,000.00 ESTIMATED PRESERVATION COSTS $494,280 LHB Mead lunt JUNE 2014 Projected Costs V -21 Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Vacant Land Purchase Agreement: Weber Woods Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: A motion to authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a purchase agreement for approximately 9.77 acres of property owned by the City of Minneapolis. INTRODUCTION: The City of Minneapolis owns approximately 14.54 acres of property located directly south and west of the intersection of 40th St. and France Ave. Approximately 9.77 acres of the site is in Edina and 4.77 acres is located in St. Louis Park. The property was purchased in the 1920’s by the City of Minneapolis to serve as a future asset for the Minneapolis municipal water utility. Other than a pump station located near France Avenue, there are no other buildings on the site. The City of St. Louis Park manages a small portion of Minikahda Vista Park on the far northwest corner of the site through a lease agreement with the City of Minneapolis. The City of Edina has no current formal agreement for use of the site. In 2006, staff from St. Louis Park and Edina approached the City of Minneapolis about using the site as off-leash dog park. At that time, Minneapolis was not interested in selling or leasing property to either city. Despite the fact that dog park proposal did not go forward in 2006, the site has been used as an unofficial off-leash dog park, along with other unsupervised activities, ever since. The City of Minneapolis first approached City staff from St. Louis Park and Edina in September of 2013 to advise that the property was being declared to be “excess land” and was to be sold the City of Minneapolis. Because the land was located in St. Louis Park and Edina, Minneapolis city officials wanted to discuss a the possibility of a bilateral sale of the pro rata share of the site to each City instead of putting the land on the market for possible sale and subsequent private development, most likely as new residential sites. During the initial discussion among the cities, the City of Minneapolis proposed that St. Louis Park and Edina purchase their pro rata shares of the site, or they would proposed to sell the site to residential real estate developers. Minneapolis officials shared two concept plans for subdividing the site into a total of 27 single-family parcels. Approximately seven of those single family residential lots were in St. Louis Park and 20 were in Edina. City staff from both cities disputed the feasibility of Minneapolis’ plans and both City Council’s expressed their strong preference for the site to remain undeveloped in the future, or developed as a park and open space function. Both City Councils directed their respective staffs to engage in negotiations with the City of Minneapolis to purchase our pro rata share of the site. The City Council has discussed this topic on a numerous occasions over the past three years. Discussions have been ongoing since 2013, and have included informal discussions and meetings, formal appraisals, environmental analysis, and exchange of offers. On April 18, 2016 the St. Louis Park City Council approved the final draft of a purchase agreement with the City of Minneapolis for their 4.77 acres of the site. Because the City of Minneapolis indicated at the earliest stages of the discussions that they would sell the land to both cities or neither city, Edina negotiators have tentatively agreed to the same terms as the City of St. Louis Park. Those terms include: · Purchase Price - $1,072,000.00 payable in cash at closing · Use Restrictions – The City has agreed to a restriction on the future development of the land to be park, recreation, open space or storm water management. Because Edina agreed to this restriction, Edina is paying a lower unit price for the land than St. Louis Park is paying because St. Louis Park did not agree to restriction on their future use of the site. · Closing Costs – Being split in the usual and customary manner. · Other Considerations – The sale to Edina is contingent on Minneapolis entering into a purchase agreement with the City of St. Louis Park and that the closing for both transactions are done simultaneously. The proceeds for this purchase will be internally financed, initially, and then refinanced through a general obligation bond issue the City will complete later this year. The bond funds used for this purchase will ultimately be repaid through an increase in the City's annual debt service property tax levy. I recommend the City Council approved the requested action on this matter. ATTACHMENTS: Description Purchase Agreement: Between the City of Edina and the City of Minneapolis Assessor Info 40th France 181992v4 1 VACANT LAND PURCHASE AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES. This Purchase Agreement is made on __________ day of ________________, 2015, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Purchaser”), and the CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota municipal corporation (“Seller”). 2. OFFER/ACCEPTANCE. Purchaser offers to purchase and Seller agrees to sell real property located in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto (referred to herein as the “Property”). 3. PRICE AND TERMS. The price for the real property included in this sale is One Million Seventy-two Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,072,000.00) which shall be payable by Purchaser to Seller as follows: (a) $50,000.00 in cash or certified funds at Closing; (b) The balance in cash, certified fund or pursuant to a Contract for Deed (Minnesota Uniform Conveyancing Form No. 56-M), to be delivered by Purchaser to Seller at Closing. The Contract for Deed shall be non-recourse. The principal balance of the Contract for Deed shall be amortized over three (3) years, together with interest thereon at the fixed rate of three (3%) percent per annum, which shall be calculated upon the Date of Closing. 4. DEED/MARKETABLE TITLE. Upon performance by Purchaser, Seller shall execute and deliver a Quit Claim Deed, subject to: A. Reservations of minerals or mineral rights by the State of Minnesota, if any; B. Building and zoning laws, ordinances, state and federal regulations; and C. Easement for public right-of-way and utility purposes over the East 30 feet of the Property. (hereinafter “Permitted Encumbrances”), which deed shall include the following statement: “This deed conveys after-acquired title.” 5. REAL ESTATE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. A. Real Estate Taxes Payable in the Year of Closing. Seller and Purchaser shall prorate all general real estate taxes due and payable on or pertaining to the Property in the year in which the Date of Closing occurs on a per diem basis. If the Property is a portion of one tax parcel, the prorated taxes payable herein shall be determined on a proportionate square footage basis. Seller shall pay on or before the Date of Closing all levied and pending special assessments associated with the Property as of the date of this Agreement. Seller shall pay penalty, 181992v4 2 interest and costs on any delinquent installment of taxes and special assessments payable in the year of Closing. NOTE: Property is exempt from ad valorem real estate taxes. B. Certified Special Assessments. All installments of special assessments certified for payment with the real estate taxes payable on the Property in the year of Closing shall be paid by Seller at Closing. C. All Other Levied Special Assessments. Seller shall pay on the Date of Closing all other special assessments levied against the Property as of the date of this Purchase Agreement. 6. SELLER’S BOUNDARY LINE, ACCESS, RESTRICTIONS AND LIENS. Seller represents that buildings on adjoining real property, if any, are entirely outside of the boundary lines of the Property. Seller represents that there has been no labor or material furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made. Seller represents that there are no present violations of any restrictions relating to the use or improvement of the Property. 7. ACCESS PRIOR TO CLOSING. Upon reasonable notice to Seller, Purchaser and Purchaser’s authorized agents shall have the right during the period from the date of this Agreement to the Date of Closing to enter in and upon the Property in order to make, at Purchaser’s expense, surveys, measurements, soil tests and other tests that Purchaser shall deem necessary. Purchaser agrees to restore any resulting damage to the Property and to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Seller from any and all claims by third persons of any nature whatsoever arising from Purchaser’s right of entry hereunder, including all actions, proceedings, demands, assessments, costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. Purchaser shall not perform any invasive testing of the Property without Seller’s prior written consent. Seller’s consent may be conditioned upon any restrictions that Seller deem necessary. Purchaser shall provide to Seller a copy of any such surveys, measurements, soil tests or other tests within five (5) days after receipt. 8. POSSESSION. Seller shall deliver possession of the Property not later than the actual Date of Closing. 9. TITLE INSURANCE BY SELLER. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Agreement, Purchaser shall obtain a commitment for an ALTA Owner’s Form title insurance policy (the “Commitment”) issued by Land Title, Inc. (the “Title Company”), pursuant to which the Title Company agrees to issue to the Purchaser upon the recording of the documents of conveyance referred to herein an Owner’s title insurance policy insuring the Property in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. The Commitment shall include proper searches covering bankruptcies, state and federal judgments and liens and levied and pending special assessments, which Commitment: A. Insures that Purchaser has marketable title of record to the Property, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, leases, claims and charges, all material easements, rights-of-way, covenants, conditions and restrictions and any other matters affecting title, except for Permitted Encumbrances. 181992v4 3 B. Waives or agrees to insure over the following standard exceptions: (1) Facts which would be disclosed by a comprehensive survey of the Property, if Purchaser obtains, prior to the Closing Date, at Purchaser’s sole expense, a survey satisfactory to the Title Company for purpose of waiving the standard exception for survey matters; (2) Rights and claims of parties in possession; and (3) Mechanic’s, contractor’s and material liens and lien claims. Purchaser shall be allowed ten (10) business days after the receipt of the title commitment for examination of title and making any objections, which shall be made in writing or deemed waived. 10. NOTICES. Any notice required to be given to Seller or Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given: (i) on the date of personal delivery; (ii) one day following dispatch by Express Mail or equivalent or (iii) two (2) days following mailing certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the respective addresses of the parties set out below: Seller: Director of Property Services City of Minneapolis Finance & Property Services Department 350 South 5th Street, Room 223 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 With a copy to: Robin Hennessy City of Minneapolis Office of the City Attorney 350 South 5th St, Room 210 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Purchaser: City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 With a copy to: Andrea McDowell Poehler Campbell Knutson, P.A. 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 181992v4 4 11. MINNESOTA LAW. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 12. WELL DISCLOSURE. [Check one of the following: ] X Seller certifies that Seller does not know of any wells on the Property. Wells on the Property are disclosed by Seller on the attached Well Disclosure form. 13. DISCLOSURE OF INDIVIDUAL ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM. [Check one of the following: ] X Seller certifies that Seller does not know of any individual on-site sewage treatment systems on the Property. Individual on-site sewage treatment systems on the Property are disclosed by Seller on the attached Disclosure form. 14. SELLER’S COVENANTS AND REPRESENTATIONS A. Seller as part of the consideration therefore, represents and covenants with Purchaser and its successors and assigns that: (1) Seller has the present full authority and power to execute this Agreement and, on or prior to the Date of Closing, Seller shall have the full authority and power to close the sale of the Property. B. All of Seller’s covenants and representations in this Agreement shall be true as of the date hereof and of the Closing Date, and shall be a condition precedent to the performance of Purchaser's obligations hereunder. If Purchaser discovers that any such covenant or representation is not true, Purchaser may elect prior to Closing, in addition to any of its other rights and remedies, to cancel this Agreement, or Purchaser may postpone the Closing Date up to ninety (90) days to allow time for correction. If Purchaser elects to proceed with the Closing following such discovery, Purchaser shall be deemed to have waived its rights to assert a claim against Seller arising from the inaccuracy or untruthfulness of any such covenant or representation. C. PROTECTED HISTORICAL SITES. [Select either (1) or (2) below:] Seller represents that Seller does not know if there are historical, native American, or archeological materials on or in the Property that might be protected by law. X Seller represents to the best of Seller’s knowledge that the property does not have any American Indian burial grounds, other human burial grounds, ceremonial earthworks, historical materials, and/or other archeological sites that are protected by federal or state law. Purchaser’s obligation to close is contingent upon Purchaser determining to Purchaser’s satisfaction that the property does not have any American Indian burial grounds, other human burial grounds, ceremonial 181992v4 5 earthworks, historical materials, and/or other archeological sites that are protected by federal or state law. 15. CLOSING. The closing (the “Closing”) shall occur on or before June 30, 2016, except as otherwise extended or terminated as provided under this Agreement. The Closing shall take place at the offices of the Title Company. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing, in the event that any of the contingencies provided for in this Agreement are not satisfied prior to the Date of Closing, this Agreement shall be null and void and of no further force and effect. At closing, Seller and Purchaser shall disclose their Federal Tax Identification Numbers for the purposes of completing state and federal tax forms. 16. CLOSING DOCUMENTS. A. At the Closing, Seller shall execute and/or deliver to Purchaser the following (collectively the "Closing Documents"): (1) Quit Claim Deed. A Quit Claim Deed in recordable form and reasonably satisfactory to Purchaser, which shall include the following well representations: “Seller certifies that the Seller does not know of any wells on the described Property.” The deed shall also include the following restrictive covenants: a) The Property shall be used solely for the following: (i) public park purposes, including open space, outdoor recreation, and dog park, and similar uses and facilities; (ii) storm water management facilities; and (iii) public utilities. b) Minneapolis residents shall have access in perpetuity to the Property on the same terms as Edina residents have access. c) And subject to an easement for public right-of-way and utility purposes over the East 30 feet of the Property. (2) Seller’s Affidavit. A standard form affidavit by Seller indicating that on the date of Closing there are no outstanding, unsatisfied judgments, tax liens or bankruptcies against or involving Seller or the Property; that there has been no skill, labor or material furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made or for which mechanic's liens could be filed; and that there are no other unrecorded interests in the Property. (3) Non-Foreign Person Certification. A certification in form and content satisfactory to the parties hereto and their counsel, properly executed by Seller, containing such information as shall be required by the Internal Revenue Code, and the regulations issued thereunder, in order to establish 181992v4 6 that Seller is not a “foreign person” as defined in §1445(f)(3) of such Code and such regulations. (4) Storage Tanks. If required, an affidavit with respect to storage tanks pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 116.48. (5) Well Certificate. If there is a well located on the Property, a well disclosure certificate in form and substance true to form for recording. (6) Certification. A certification that the representations made by Seller are materially the same as were in existence on the date of this Agreement or noting any changes thereto; (7) Contract for Deed. The Contract for Deed pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 3(b). (8) Other Documents. All other documents reasonably determined by either party or the title insurance company to be necessary to transfer and provide title insurance for the Property. B. At the Closing, Purchaser shall execute and deliver to Seller the following: (1) All documents reasonably determined by either party or the title insurance company to be necessary to provide title insurance for the Property; (2) Payment of the Down Payment pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 3(a); (3) The Contract for Deed pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 3(b). 17. “AS IS” PURCHASE. Except as specifically set forth in this Agreement or any document contemplated hereby, (i) the Property is being sold, conveyed, assigned, transferred and delivered “as is, where is” on the date hereof and in its condition on the date hereof, “with all faults,” and Seller is not making, and expressly disclaims, any other representation or warranties written or oral, statutory, express or implied, concerning the Property, including but not limited to, representations or warranties relating to value or quality of the Property or the prospects, financial or otherwise, risks or other incidents of the Property or with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby or thereby, and (ii) Seller specifically disclaims any representation or warranty of merchantability, usage, suitability or fitness for any particular purpose with respect to the Property or any part thereof, or as to the workmanship thereof, or the absence of any defects therein, whether latent or patent. 18. CLOSING COSTS. A. The following costs relating to the closing of this transaction shall be paid by Seller: (1) State Deed Tax; 181992v4 7 (2) All costs of obtaining a title insurance commitment; (3) The premium for an owner’s title insurance policy; (4) One-half of the closing fee charged by the Title Company and any other fees charged by the Title Company; and (5) Recording fee attributable to the Quit Claim Deed and easement identified in paragraph 4(C). B. The following costs relating to the closing of this transaction shall be paid by Purchaser as follows: (1) All recording fees attributable to the Contract for Deed; (2) The costs for engineers or other consultants, if any engaged by Purchaser regarding the Property; and (3) One-half of the closing fee charged by the Title Company and any other fees charged by the Title Company. 19. CONTINGENCIES AND ADDITIONAL TERMS. A. The Seller’s obligations under this Agreement are expressly contingent upon Seller’s satisfaction with each of the following prior to Closing: (1) Seller has entered into a Purchase Agreement for the sale to the City of St. Louis Park of Seller’s property located in St. Louis Park that abuts the Property on terms satisfactory to Seller (“St. Louis Park Purchase Agreement”) and the St. Louis Park Purchase Agreement is closed simultaneously with the closing of the transaction contemplated under this Agreement. (2) The City of Edina has taken no action to rezone the Property from its current zoning. The contingencies set forth in this section are for the sole and exclusive benefit of Seller, and Seller shall have the right to waive the contingencies by giving notice to Purchaser. B. The Purchaser’s obligations under this Agreement are expressly contingent upon Purchaser’s satisfaction with each of the following prior to Closing: (1) Purchaser determining on or before the Closing Date, that it is satisfied, in its sole discretion, with the results of matters disclosed by any survey, Phase I Environmental Audit or by any environmental/engineering investigation or 181992v4 8 testing of the Property performed by Purchaser or Purchaser's agent. By executing this Agreement, Seller hereby authorizes Purchaser to enter upon the Property at reasonable times to conduct the investigations and/or tests described herein. Purchaser shall be solely responsible for all environmental tests and shall hold Seller harmless from any such costs and shall indemnify Seller for breach of this provision including reasonable attorneys' fees. (2) Seller providing to Purchaser within 10 days of the execution of this Agreement, true and correct copies of any existing surveys, permits, licenses, leases, and complete copies of all contracts currently affecting the Property readily available or in the possession of Seller, and notices received within the last 90 days from the city, state or other governmental authorities pertaining to uncured violations of any law, ordinance or regulation. (3) Purchaser determining that it is satisfied with the title to the Property. (4) The City of Minneapolis preparing the contract for deed, deed and easements required under this Agreement in a form approved by the City of Edina. (5) Seller has entered into a Purchase Agreement for the sale to the City of St. Louis Park of Seller’s property located in St. Louis Park that abuts the Property on terms satisfactory to Seller (“St. Louis Park Purchase Agreement”) and the St. Louis Park Purchase Agreement is closed simultaneously with the closing of the transaction contemplated under this Agreement. The contingencies set forth in this section are for the sole and exclusive benefit of Purchaser, and Purchaser shall have the right to waive the contingencies by giving notice to Seller. 20. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence for all provisions of this Purchase Agreement. 21. MULTIPLE ORIGINALS. Seller and Purchaser have signed two (2) originals of this Purchase Agreement. The parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year set forth above. 181992v4 9 PURCHASER: City of Edina By: Its: SELLER: City of Minneapolis Approved as to Form By: __________________________________ Assistant City Attorney By: ________________________ Finance Officer 181992v4 10 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2016-07 & Resolution No. 2016-53; Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan and Development Contract for DLC at 3250 West 66th Street - The Millennium at Southdale Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached Ordinance No. 2016-07 and Resolution No. 2016-53 approving the Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Approve the development contract, and authorize signatures. INTRODUCTION: The applicant is requesting final approval of the Millennium at Southdale. This includes rezoning of the property to PUD, and approval of Phase 1 of development. Phase 2 will require final site plan review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. Please note that no changes have been made to the plans that were approved by the City Council at Preliminary Approval; with the exception of adding the sidewalks as recommended by the City Council. The applicant is also requesting approval of the development contract that has been drafted by the Edina City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2016-07 Resolution No. 2016-53 March 16, 2016 City Council Minutes Proposed Final Plans - Part 1 Proposed Final Plans - Part 2 Approved Preliminary Plans Development Agreement ORDINANCE NO. 2016-07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-10, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-10 DISTRICT AT 6550 XERXES AND 3250 66th STREET WEST The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to rezone the below described property to PUD, Planned Unit Development in accordance with the following: Sec. 36-503 Planned Unit Development District-10 (PUD-10) – Millennium at Southdale (a) Legal description: See Attached. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans received by the City on April 1, 2016 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2016-53, on file in the Office of the Planning Division. (c) Principal Uses: All principal uses allowed in the POD, Planned Office Commercial District Retail uses allowed in the PCD-1 District Multi-Family Residential (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the POD, Planned Office District- (POD) (e) Conditional Uses: None (f) Development Standards. Development standards per the POD Zoning District, except the following: 2 (g) Signs for office uses shall be allowed per the POD standards in Sec. 36-1714. Signs for commercial uses shall be allowed per Sec. 36-1714, PCD-1 regulations. Signs for residential uses shall be allowed per the Sec. 36-1712 Residential Districts. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon Met Council review and decision on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: March, 15, 2016 Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Building Setbacks Front – 66th/York Avenue Side – East Side – West Rear – North 20 feet 10 feet 20 feet 90 feet Maximum FAR 2.00% 3 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 17, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2016. ________________________________ City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2016-53 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM POD-1&2, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT TO PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTAND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 6550 XERXES AVNUE AND 3250 66TH STREET WEST BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 DLC Residential, LLC is proposing to redevelop the 5.6 acre office building sites at 6550 Xerxes and 3250 66th Street West. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing buildings and redevelop the site with the following two phase development: Phase 1 (3250 66th Street West): A 6-7 story, 227-unit apartment building, with two levels of underground parking, a club room, fitness area, and a green roof with an amenity terrace, including a pool. Phase 2 (6650 Xerxes Avenue): A 5-6 story, 145-unit apartment building. Five and four floors of housing above the parking and amenities area. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See Attached Exhibit A. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following land use applications are requested: 1. Final Rezoning from POD-1&2, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and 2. Final Development Plan. 1.04 On November 12, 2015, the Planning Commission considered the request. A motion to approve the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan failed. Vote: 4 Ayes and 5 Nays. 1.05 As a result of Planning Commission concerns in regard to the traffic study, Kimley Horn revised their traffic study to update/increase the anticipated growth numbers in the surrounding area. The revised study still concludes that there are no improvements that need to be made to the existing roadway system. 1.06 On March 15, 2016, the City Council unanimously approved the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-53 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed final plans are consistent with the approved preliminary plans. The applicant has updated the preliminary plans to meet the conditions of Council approval at preliminary approval. 2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as “Community Activity Center – CAC,” which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multi-family residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as amended. 3. The proposed land uses, multi-family residential and office are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. 4. The proposed development is within the height and density guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of the proposed use, which is predominantly residential, seems appropriate for the area. 6. The traffic and parking study done by Kimley Horn concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. 7. The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents to the north through the development to connect to the Southdale area. 8. The public realm provided for in the development would be within and around the sidewalk areas. The proposed plans invite people through the project from the north to provide a pedestrian access to Southdale and the Metro Transit station. Boulevard style sidewalks are provided to comfortably move residents around the building and through the project to create a comfortable pedestrian experience. A large green space, adjacent to the boulevard style sidewalk is proposed to fill in the right-turn lane, another signature of this gateway area. 9. The development would include affordable housing. 10. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 11. The proposal addresses many of the working principles of the Greater Southdale Area Working Group as mentioned in the above findings. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-53 Page 3 12. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. i. Provision of affordable housing. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development and Final Development Plan for Phase 1, subject to the following conditions: 1. Phase 1 shall be built per the plans submitted and date stamped April 1, 2016. 2. Building plans must show all mechanical equipment and the means to screen it. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located in front of the building on a public street. 3. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-53 Page 4 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May 5, 2016. 8. As part of a Developer’s Agreement, the property owner would be required to participate in appropriate cost sharing improvements to the 66th and York intersection which may include elimination of the right turn lane, providing green space and improving pedestrian crossings. That cost has been set at $40,000. 9. Five percent (5%) of the housing units shall be designated for affordable housing. Detail of the affordable housing is established in the development agreement, and shall continue for 20 years from the date of Certificate of Occupancy. 10. Sustainable design principles must be used per the applicant narrative. The building shall meet the current state energy code guidelines. A plan of how standards are intended to be met must be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. 11. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. The temporary cell pole must be removed as soon as possible. No final occupancy permit will be granted for the apartment building until the pole is removed. 13. A 30-foot roadway easement shall be dedicated at the time of Final Development Plan for Phase 2, for a future extension of 65th Street. 14. No construction parking on York Avenue and the neighborhood to the north. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-53 Page 5 Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on May 17, 2016. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 17, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2016. _________________________________ City Clerk 186692v3 1 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA MILLENNIUM EDINA, LLC AGREEMENT dated May 17, 2016, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and MILLENNIUM EDINA, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the successor to DLC Residential, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Developer”). 1. BACKGROUND. A. Developer has applied to develop property in two phases, phase one being located on the land legally described on Exhibit “A” as Phase 1 (“Phase I”), and phase two being located on the land legally described on Exhibit “A” as Phase II (“Phase II”), and all of which is embraced within the real property legally described on Exhibit “A” as the Subject Property (the “Subject Property”). The lot lines of the Subject Property will be adjusted to conform to the legal descriptions of Phase I and Phase II, provided Developer make application for a lot line adjustment with the City, which may be approved administratively. B. Developer on behalf of the property owners has submitted an application to rezone the Subject Property to Planned Unit Development for construction of a building containing 227 apartment units on Phase I and a building containing 145 apartment units on Phase II. The City has rezoned the Subject Property to Planned unit Development. 186692v3 2 2. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. This Agreement is a condition of the City’s rezoning the Subject Property to Planned Unit Development and will be recorded against the Subject Property. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin County’s Recorder’s office, and 2) the necessary security required pursuant to Section 12 has been received by the City, and 3) the necessary insurance for the Developer and its construction contractors pursuant to Section 16(G) has been received by the City. 4. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the plans on file with the City. The plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans (“Plans”) are Millennium at Southdale Final Rezoning and Redevelopment plans 4/1/2016.. 5. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plans, Sheets C2.1 through C2.4 of the Plans (the “Erosion Control Plans”), shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification which may include temporary seed to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the Erosion Control Plans, and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on down the letter of credit to pay 186692v3 3 any costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved Erosion Control Plan. 6. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 7. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance with the Construction Management Plan to be prepared and approved by the City Staff prior to demolition or construction on the Subject Property. 8. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Public Improvements mean the Public Sidewalk, watermain and street lights shown on those portions of the Plans identified as public improvements (the “Public Improvements”) shall be installed in accordance with City standard specifications and ordinances including. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment is prohibited between the hours of 9 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. Monday thru Friday and after 6 o’clock p.m. on Saturday and on Sundays and legal holidays without the City Engineer’s written approval. The Developer shall convey to the City an easement for the public watermain and an easement for the public sidewalk, if the public sidewalk is not already in a location where the City has an easement. 9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install the Public Improvements on or by November 30, 2017 and shall complete the Landscaping on or before November 30, 2018. 10. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 11. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City, the public improvements identified in the Plans and Specifications lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 186692v3 4 12. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement, the payment of the costs of all Public Improvements, and construction of all Public Improvements the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto ("security") for $100,000, plus a cash fee of $6,000 for City engineering administration. This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager. The City may draw down the security, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down without notice. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Public Improvements have been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time [by ninety percent (90%) for each component of the Public Improvements (i.e., the Sidewalk, street lights and the Landscaping) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer to be released as permitted hereunder shall be retained as security until all Public Improvements have been complete, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty security is provided, and the Public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. 13. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants the Public Improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship and that the required landscaping survives for the warranty period. The warranty period for the Public Improvements and Landscaping is two years. The warranty for the Public Improvements shall commence following completion and acceptance of the Public Improvements by City Council. The warranty period for the landscaping shall commence following planting, inspection and approval by the City. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified costs to secure the public improvement and landscaping warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the 186692v3 5 Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. 14. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. A. Affordable Housing Covenants. Eleven (11) completed residential housing units in Phase I shall be leased to tenants for annual amounts (inclusive of all utilities except electrical service for air conditioning and telephone service) not exceeding sixty percent (60%) of the median family income for the Twin Cities Metropolitan area in which the Subject Property is located as that figure is determined and announced from time to time by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, adjusted for family size, and seven (7) completed residential housing units in Phase II shall be leased to tenants for annual amounts (inclusive of all utilities except electrical service for air conditioning and telephone service) not exceeding sixty percent (60%) of the median family income for the statewide area in which the Subject Property is located as that figure is determined and announced from time to time by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, adjusted for family size. The Affordable Housing Covenants shall continue for a period of twenty (20) years, as to Phase I, form the date of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (of temporary Certificate of Occupancy) for Phase I, and, as to Phase II, form the date of the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (of temporary Certificate of Occupancy) for Phase II. B. Compliance with the requirements of City Resolution 2016-53. C. Compliance with the requirement of the planned unit Development zoning, Ordinance 2016-08 as may be amended. D. Compliance with the requirements in the Director of Engineering’s memorandum dated May 5, 2016. 186692v3 6 E. On or before any construction activity occurs in Phase II the Developer must convey to the City by Warrant deed the North 30’ of the subject properties for the future West 65th Street. F. The City may at any time close the “free right entrance” off Xerxes Avenue and construct boulevard improvements. The Developer shall pay the City $40,000.00 for its share of the cost. The City shall invoice the City and the Developer shall pay the City within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice. 15. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the site, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and development of the Subject Property, the preparation of this Agreement, review of any other plans and documents. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from development of the site and installation of public improvements. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. In the event the City is successful in litigation to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in litigation and subsequent enforcement of this Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. 16. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. 186692v3 7 B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. D. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connections or inspections may be conducted and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. F. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. G. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $100,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for 186692v3 8 each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage. The Developer and contractors must provide a Certificate of Insurance which provides that the City of Edina is named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis. H. The Developer and its contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to the limit of $100,000.00 each accident. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it. K. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. L. The Developer represents to the City that to the Developer’s best knowledge the development complies (or will comply) with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse 186692v3 9 to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 17. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than ten (10) days in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 18. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: c/o DLC Residential, LLC, 21500 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 402, Aventura, Florida 33180. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330. 19. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. Upon completion of the Public Improvements, the City will execute the attached Certificate of Completion, which Developer may record in the real estate records at its sole cost and expense. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 186692v3 10 CITY OF EDINA BY: ________________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor AND _______________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2016, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 186692v3 11 DEVELOPER: MILLENNIUM EDINA, LLC BY: ______________________________________ Name: ______________________________ Title: ____________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2016, by ____________________________of Millennium Edina, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. __________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 [RNK] 186692v3 12 EXHIBIT “A” Legal Descriptions 186692v3 13 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT _______________________________________________________, fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Agreement, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2016. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _____________, 2016, by ______________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452-5000 RNK 186692v3 14 MORTGAGE CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT _______________________________________________________, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Agreement, agrees that the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2016. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2016, by __________________________________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452-5000 RNK 186692v3 15 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2_____. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Department Item Activity: Subject:Grandview Feasibility and Operational Analysis Final Report Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Receive final report and final presentation of the Grandview Facility Feasibility and Operational Analysis and provide direction on study completion. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Grandview Facility Staff Report Grandview Facility Final Presentation Grandview Facility Final Report Grandview Facility Final Report Appendix A Grandview Facility Final Report Appendix B Grandview Facility Final Report Appendix C Grandview Report To City Council 5-17-2016 May 17, 2016 Mayor and City Council Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Grandview Facility Feasibility & Operational Analysis Final Report Information / Background: The Grandview Facility Feasibility & Operational Analysis Study is complete. Stakeholders groups were interviewed and visioning sessions began in December 2015. The Task Force met six times to review information and provide feedback and direction. The Arts & Culture Commission and Park Board received updates and provided feedback five times prior to this meeting. Community open houses were held on Jan. 21 and on March 10 at which approximately 100 residents attended and provided valuable feedback. The City Council received updates at work sessions in February and March. Based on all input received, staff and the consulting teams prepared a DRAFT space program with a set of “core” facility components and another set of “enhanced” facility components. Any of the “enhanced” facilities were optional additions to the core program individually or as a group. Core programs: Art Center, Active Adult (Senior) programming, fitness/education classes, meeting rooms and restaurant. Enhanced programs: Additional Art Center space, larger lobby, drop-in childcare and indoor play structure, an event/performance venue, video production space for the Edina Communications Department, fitness center with cardio, free weights, circuit training and locker rooms, a gymnasium and leasable space for a wellness partner. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Facility Options At the Feb. 17 City Council Work Session, after reviewing potential facility programs and their associated capital and operating budgets, the City Council provided direction for the task force to move forward studying Option B, Core (Active Adult, Art, Café) plus event space. With that direction, HGA Architecture prepared two design options for how this facility could fit onto the Grandview site with these components. Staff and the task force continued to further refine the facility, capital costs and associated pro formas. With feedback from the task force, Arts & Culture Commission and Park Board, HGA Architecture created a Preferred Option. At the April 19 City Council Work Session, the City Council provided feedback on the Preferred Option massing diagram and site fit model. Pro Forma Staff worked with PROS Consulting and Sutton & Associates on pro formas for the facility. One-year and six-year pro formas are below. Jeff Bransford from PROS Consulting will be present to answer any questions regarding the pro forma. One-Year Pro Forma Six Year Pro Forma STAFF REPORT Page 3 Staff Summary Staff continues to be concerned about the cost of parking at this site. Due to the nature on the structured parking required, the cost of parking is estimated to be $37,500 per stall for a total parking structure cost estimate of $14,250,000. This does not include any transit parking. HGA Architecture and LHB worked together closely to share information from the concurrent Grandview Facility Feasibility & Operational Analysis and the Grandview Transportation Study. Findings from the Transportation Study are included in the final HGA site plan. Another concern is the estimated annual operating deficit of over $650,000. Currently the Art Center operates with an average three-year annual loss of $157,671 and the Senior Center operates with an average three-year annual loss of $54,044. The three-year average total loss of those two facilities is $211,715. If both of these facilities moved operations to the new facility at Grandview, the additional $438,285 subsidy would require re-prioritization of other general fund or enterprise fund facilities and/or programs or additional taxes would be required to cover the operating deficit. The current Art Center is a renovated home that was built in the late1940s. It was purchased in 1976, transformed into an Art Center and opened its doors in 1977. While some describe it as unique and having character, it is an old, awkward facility that does not have adequate storage, office space, parking, gallery or gift shop space and is non-ADA compliant. The Arts & Culture Commission members have been clear that they believe that the Art Center needs either a significant remodel, which would be difficult given ADA requirements, or a new facility. This is also supported by the Sutton + Associates Edina Art Center Analysis that was completed in 2012. Revenues Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Custodial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Arts $588,671 $606,331 $624,521 $643,257 $662,554 $682,431 Active Adults $107,364 $110,585 $113,902 $117,320 $120,839 $124,464 Fitness Programs $46,800 $48,204 $49,650 $51,140 $52,674 $54,254 Facility Rentals $94,100 $96,923 $99,831 $102,826 $105,910 $109,088 Café $714,400 $735,832 $757,907 $780,644 $804,063 $828,185 Total $1,551,335 $1,597,875 $1,645,811 $1,695,186 $1,746,041 $1,798,422 Expenditures Administration $529,650 $539,797 $550,341 $561,299 $572,685 $584,518 Maintenance $156,405 $158,147 $159,955 $161,832 $163,781 $165,805 Custodial $146,056 $146,472 $146,902 $147,346 $147,805 $148,280 Arts $555,180 $572,842 $591,192 $610,256 $630,064 $650,643 Active Adults $145,000 $149,105 $153,370 $157,800 $162,401 $167,181 Fitness Programs $46,358 $47,550 $48,789 $50,078 $51,417 $52,810 Facility Rentals $24,570 $24,680 $24,794 $24,912 $25,035 $25,163 Café $607,240 $631,530 $656,791 $683,062 $710,385 $738,800 Total $2,210,458 $2,270,122 $2,332,133 $2,396,585 $2,463,574 $2,533,200 Total Cost Recovery 70% 70% 71% 71% 71% 71% STAFF REPORT Page 4 Staff and consultants led a solid public process and completed a thorough and detailed analysis of the site and operations. The City Council, Park Board and Arts & Culture Commission had many opportunities to provide consultation and specific direction. The consulting team was incredibly responsive and carefully considered and included all feedback. The collaboration between the Parks & Recreation Department and Edina Community Education staff was excellent. Task Force Comments Member Jones stated that she thinks this site gives the city a huge opportunity as far as location because it is a centrally located piece of land, which is rare. She wants them to try to hang on to it because it is unusual to have three acres centrally located that could be near transit. She feels strongly that the parks programming has all been south of Hwy. 62 and as a city they should be thinking strategically to invest in programming north of Hwy. 62 for the residents for that half of the city. She feels as a city they do not have very much general indoor recreation space, especially north of Hwy. 62. When she thinks about their programming space and their space needs she thinks geographic equity is very important and access to transit is also very important. The city is pursuing high density residential in this area without considering recreational needs for the new residents. She would consider this either as park land, they are talking about 10 blocks of high density residential without additional park space, and she would suggest that the people that would be moving in should have a park, even just on those two lots alone just Public Works and OLG site is a neighborhood the size of Strachauer Park which in the city planning days they put in a park facility, warming house for those residents. This area will have more residents than that. Strategically they should either leave that as open space or just open park land or a recreational space to serve the needs of future residents. They are creating a new neighborhood. She stated that the framework, she’s been with the process since the initiation, consistently called for a community building. The feedback has been for a community building, a multi-generational community building. She is hoping that council continues to hear that we need a community space and it would be nice to combine both recreation and the arts. She thinks it is really appealing. She thinks that we should be looking at the current programming mix as it is not maximized in this scenario and that limiting their selection of programs really hindered this process. Member Gunness stated that she likes what HGA has done especially in this updated version. She appreciated the flexibility provided for even things about the parking, having two faces to the building so it seems like you built in flexibility for now and in the future. She likes that it acknowledges as best as they can the transportation options into the future. Her favorite part of it is the art and wellness terrace. She loves those together. That encapsulates how inspiring this whole thing could be. She feels like it captures indoor space, outdoor space, it’s flexible in terms of transportation going forward, it’s flexible in terms of the kind of programming that we can be offering, how rooms can be used in more than one way. The event center is STAFF REPORT Page 5 another example of being able to split into two spaces to hold two events at the same time. She thinks the indoor and outdoor spaces are incredible. She knows it must have been a lot of work to reconfigure everything but she thinks the way that they have this event center at the highest point with the multiple views and with the kiln yard, is the most exciting. She loves how HGA was thinking about the collecting point for people whether they come on foot or by car or from the street you are going to have a similar entrance feeling. Member Miller stated that this provides an opportunity to upgrade the present services to expand to new services. She thinks it does it very generously and efficiently. She thinks it’s pretty exciting to have the Art Center in the center of the city with all of these wonderful facilities. She stated some of the language that we used in talking about what the new art center would be “state of the art” and we are a little shy about using that because we don’t want it to immediately say that it would be expensive but the fact is that this kind of a facility would be a state of the art facility and would offer a lot of opportunities for that kind of programming. The only thing that I would add hearing Cheryl’s comments is how happy we are with the fact that HGA kept coming back with drawings that reflected the comments that were made at the different meetings and she thinks that is very admirable that HGA listened and changed things around so you gave the city a lot to work with. The Park Board received the final report and presentation at the May 10, 2016 Park Board Meeting. May 10 Park Board Member Review and Comment Member Miller Member Miller stated as far as the facility itself he thinks they’ve done a great job of the design by taking into account a lot of the requests and what we want to do. He also feels it would be great if this was the beginning of creating a center of gravity for the City of Edina. With that being said, the biggest issue he has is creating a facility that is losing money every year. One thing he doesn’t know is if they understand what is the effect on the total Edina budget because he thinks what they are seeing is a microcosm of the Edina budget that says this specific facility is a $650,000 per year loss. He noted what they’ve heard a little bit tonight is they are pulling this from here and they are pulling that from there and so what they are not seeing is the effect on the overall budget. What he means by that is he doesn’t know if they actually create the $650,000 in loss or if they are just moving things around and it just so happens on this spreadsheet they are reflecting that. STAFF REPORT Page 6 Member Miller also stated that he believes the discussion that they had last month was it’s the City Council’s opinion that getting into the more sophisticated fitness with memberships is over and beyond what the core competency would be and the revenue projections; however, they don’t really know if those are accurate. Member Miller stated in summary for him he thinks the facility space would be the start of something great and it looks like a beautiful facility but he just gets a lot of heartburn on the financial aspects of it. Member Nelson Member Nelson stated that she also agrees with what Member Miller said. She thinks the design is great and it’s a really nice molding of the two options they talked about and would like to echo the design is great. It is concerning that they talked before that the Senior Center and the Art Center are currently a loss, and we are building a building for the loss with more of a loss but hoping that it will grow into something bigger. She thinks there is a need there but it’s a concern that we are building a bigger building to collect the loss together. She understands that the struggle is how we get the City Council in the agreement that maybe we should add more fitness. She does understand that side of council’s reason thinking it’s a struggle but with the financials it’s really hard for her to get her arms around that. It would be great to have a real community center for the community and she doesn’t know that just the arts and the active adults are going to really be that big staple they would like it to be or what she would hope it would be from a visionary perspective. She thinks a lot of great work has gone into this and she thinks it’s deciding what the real goal here is and what they are trying to accomplish. Chair McCormick Chair McCormick stated the committee has done a great job and the new design looks wonderful, beautiful and functional and with the constraints they were given Option B was probably the best design they could come up with and she really applauds everyone for that. However, she doesn’t recommend going forward with this particular option for many of the reasons that have already been said. The first is from a financial perspective; it doesn’t make sense for the city, the parking is too expensive and the site is focused on just a few of their constituents where she was hoping to have something broader than that for a community center. She is also concerned about the traffic because there is a lot of traffic that goes in and out of that area and if there is an event center that might be unmanageable or expensive to manage and that may not have been considered yet. The other thing she is really struggling with is that they aren’t holding themselves to break even on this and do STAFF REPORT Page 7 they really understand what the community wants out of a community center. She thinks they keep calling it a community center and it ends up being something that they are just trying to force fit the Art Center and Senior Center. Both facilities need to be upgraded. They need to do something with the Art Center but they need to put it in the right place and it needs to be economically and financially sound for the city. They also need to really look at what they need to do from a community space and make sure they select the right location, right parking, right structure and space for it. She loves the ideas of having something in this space; some sort of public area but would like to see something that is more financially sound and basically breaks even. Member Good Member Good stated he echoes the thoughts of his fellow board members. Mr. Pechaty and the whole team did great work; it was well presented and well designed for the option they were presented and from the different inputs from the way this has progressed. He really likes what he sees and it looks very interesting. However, from a fiduciary perspective he finds it very difficult to recommend that they take on an additional, even if it’s a net, half a million dollars of subsidy to get an expanded Art Center, new replacement Senior Center/Active Adult and an event center. He doesn’t yet in his mind have a real vision for what it’s going to do and it’s 8 million dollars in capital to bring in $100,000 a year in revenue; an additional burden potentially on the city. He noted with that said they still have a space that they haven’t quite figured out what to do with and they have a couple of assets that they dearly need to figure out how to help and replace, so it remains a challenge; he is just not comfortable that this is the right answer for that challenge. He agrees with what Chair McCormick said as well, that the traffic in that location is already challenging so he can’t even get excited about going to a bigger option because that just makes it even worse. He is just not comfortable that they have found the right set of solutions here to address this as a recommended proposal. Member Meyer Member Meyer stated there have been a lot of great comments made. He would stress the whole traffic thing because they have the traffic off of Hwy. 100 basically dumping into the front door here and he just questions if that really is a long term solution they want here. The traffic is going to be fighting from all directions. The real option is listed but it seems like an appendage that is sort of added on and he doesn’t think it’s been completely thought through. He also has concerns about the ongoing costs of the current Art Center and Senior Center; those aren’t going to go away so those are in addition to these losses they are currently occurring and how is that going to play out. They need to better understand that. Also, what are they STAFF REPORT Page 8 going to do with those facilities if a facility like this is built because he also has concerns about creating a facility where they know on day one they are generating a loss when there are options available that do break even or appear to have the opportunity to turn a profit. Member Dahlien Member Dahlien stated that he is going to try to come up with a creative comment after everyone else has already spoken here. The traffic is probably the biggest thing that is of interest to him especially when you think of the two major constituents of this proposed project. People with art supplies walking in with a bunch of stuff and they are trying to cross over, as Member Good said some pretty tough traffic as it stands today, as well as the seniors/active adults trying to get dropped off and trying to fight that traffic. That to him is the most pressing of the issues with what is proposed here. Fiduciary or financial is also a big thing here so he seconds to all of that. The one thing that he would say is he knows that he is not an artist but he tries to champion the arts and he knows the current situation with the Art Center is of a main concern to the people that use that, especially with the age of the facility and some of things that are limiting there especially with the ADA and stuff like that. He would like to see if there has ever been any thought or research done about an existing space that maybe we already have or a new space that is specifically only to the Art Center. He knows there is not a lot of supply of grass, land and dirt in this city but he thinks taking the Art Center and putting it into a nice new facility is very nice and thoughtful but at the same time they have their own kind of unique place currently in the city and he wants to make sure that they are able to fulfill all of their current programming and also be unique and vibrant to that community as well. He falls in line with everyone else; he is a little concerned with what this space is being used for or proposed to be used for but at the same time he is also not looking forward to another season of barrier storage in the space either. It’s an interesting conundrum we all face. Student Member Lohani Student Member Lohani stated he likes the overall layout of the site and the programs within the building and how they are situated. His concerns are with the traffic and the cost of the parking and how it relates to the total overall cost recovery expected. He is still excited to see what the Metro Transit addition will add to the site in the next couple of years. Student Member Crist STAFF REPORT Page 9 Student Member Crist stated that she thinks it looks beautiful and it could be a really cool new thing, but to her it does still feel like a Senior Center and an Art Center and less of a community center. There is kind of an age gap there so it’s lacking a little bit of a draw. The final Grandview Facility Feasibly and Operational Analysis is attached and is available on the City of Edina website at: http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=grandview-fpw HGA, Pros Consulting, Sutton + Associates and staff will make the presentation and be available for questions. Action Requested Receive final report and final presentation of the Grandview Facility Feasibility and Operational Analysis and provide direction on study completion. 17 May 2016 ED I N A G R A N D V I E W C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R FEASIBILITY STUDY The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 2 SE V E N G U I D I N G P R I N C I P L E S GR A N D V I E W D I S T R I C T 1. L e v e r a g e p u b l i c l y - o w n e d p a r c e l s a n d c i v i c p r e s e n c e to c r e a t e a v i b r a n t a n d c o n n e c t e d d i s t r i c t t h a t se r v e s a s a c a t a l y s t fo r h i g h q u a l i t y , i n t e g r a t e d p u b l i c a n d p r i v a t e d e v e l o p m e n t . 2. E n h a n c e t h e D i s t r i c t ’ s e c o n o m i c v i a b i l i t y a s a n e i g h b o r h o o d c e n t e r w i t h r e g i o n a l c o n n e c t i o n s , re c o g n i z i n g t h a t m e e t i n g t h e n e e d s o f b o t h b u s i n e s s e s a n d r e s i d e n t s w i l l m a k e t h e d i s t r i c t a g o o d p l a c e to d o b u s i n e s s . 3. Tu r n p e r c e i v e d b a r r i e r s i n t o o p p o r t u n i t i e s . C o n s i d e r l a y e r i n g d e v e l o p m e n t o v e r s u p p o r t i n g in f r a s t r u c t u r e a n d t a k i n g a d v a n t a g e o f th e n a t u r a l t o p o g r a p h y o f t h e a r e a . 4. De s i g n f o r t h e p r e s e n t a n d t h e f u t u r e by p u r s u i n g l o g i c a l i n c r e m e n t s o f c h a n g e u s i n g k e y p a r c e l s a s st e p p i n g s t o n e s t o a m o r e v i b r a n t , w a l k a b l e , fu n c t i o n a l , a t t r a c t i v e , a n d l i f e - f i l l e d p l a c e . 5. Or g a n i z e p a r k i n g as a n e f f e c t i v e r e s o u r c e f o r t h e d i s t r i c t b y l i n k i n g c o m m u n i t y p a r k i n g t o p u b l i c a n d pr i v a t e d e s t i n a t i o n s w h i l e a l s o p r o v i d i n g p a r k i n g th a t i s c o n v e n i e n t f o r b u s i n e s s e s a n d c u s t o m e r s . 6. Im p r o v e m o v e m e n t w i t h i n a n d a c c e s s to t h e d i s t r i c t f o r p e o p l e o f a l l a g e s b y f a c i l i t a t i n g m u l t i p l e mo d e s o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d p r e s e r v e f u t u r e t r a n s i t o p p o r t u n i t i e s p r o v i d e d b y t h e r a i l c o r r i d o r . 7. Cr e a t e a n i d e n t i t y a n d u n i q u e s e n s e o f p l a c e th a t i n c o r p o r a t e s n a t u r a l s p a c e s i n t o a h i g h q u a l i t y an d s u s t a i n a b l e d e v e l o p m e n t r e f l e c t i n g E d in a ’ s i n n o v a t i v e d e v e l o p m e n t h e r i t a g e . The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 3 • De m o g r a p h i c A n a l y s i s Po p u l a t i o n Ag e s e g m e n t a t i o n Ho u s e h o l d I n c o m e Ra c e • Na t i o n a l & L o c a l T r e n d s • Ne i g h b o r i n g C o m m u n i t y F a c i l i t i e s • Re v i e w S u r v e y D a t a (E T C I n s t i t u t e , 2 0 1 4 C i t y o f E d i n a C i t i z e n S u r v e y ) PR O G R A M M I N G MA R K E T A N A L Y S I S The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 4 • Ac t i v e A d u l t • Ar t C e n t e r • Co m m u n i c a t i o n & T e c h n o l o g y ( C T S ) • Co m m u n i t y E d u c a t i o n • Hi s t o r i c a l S o c i e t y • Fi t n e s s & W e l l n e s s • Yo u t h PR O G R A M M I N G US E R G R O U P M E E T I N G S The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 5 Op e n H o u s e 1 | P r o g r a m V i s i o n i n g Op e n H o u s e 2 | D e s i g n R e v i e w PR O G R A M M I N G CO M M U N I T Y O P E N H O U S E S The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 6 2/ 1 7 / 2 0 1 6 CI T Y C O U N C I L DI R E C T I O N CI T Y C O U N C I L R E V I E W PR O G R A M O P T I O N S The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 7 CI T Y C O U N C I L R E V I E W PR E F E R R E D P R O G R A M | O P T I O N B The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 8 FI T P L A N S OV E R V I E W EA S T A E R I A L EA S T P E R S P E C T I V E SO U T H E A S T A E R I A L The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 17 CA P I T A L C O S T BU I L D I N G & P A R K I N G The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 18 SE R V I C E TI T L E Re v e n u e s E x p e n d i t u r e s Revenues Over (Under) ExpendituresCost Recovery ‐ Percent Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n $ 0 $ 5 2 9 , 6 5 0 ($529,650)0% Ma i n t e n a n c e $ 0 $ 1 5 6 , 4 0 5 ($156,405)0% Cu s t o d i a l $ 0 $ 1 4 6 , 0 5 6 ($146,056)0% Ar t s $ 5 8 8 , 6 7 1 $ 5 5 5 , 1 8 0 $ 3 3 , 4 9 1 1 0 6 % Ac t i v e Ad u l t s $ 1 0 7 , 3 6 4 $ 1 4 5 , 0 0 0 ($37,636)74% Fi t n e s s P r o g r a m s $ 4 6 , 8 0 0 $ 4 6 , 3 5 8 $ 4 4 3 1 0 1 % Fa c i l i t y Re n t a l s $ 9 4 , 1 0 0 $ 2 4 , 5 7 0 $ 6 9 , 5 3 0 3 8 3 % Ca f é $ 7 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 6 0 7 , 2 4 0 $ 1 0 7 , 1 6 0 1 1 8 % To t a l $1 , 5 5 1 , 3 3 5 $ 2 , 2 1 0 , 4 5 8 ($659,123)70% OP E R A T I N G R E V E N U E S & E X P E N D I T U R E S PR O F O R M A | O N E Y E A R S U M M A R Y The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 19 Re v e n u e s Ye a r 1Y e a r 2Y e a r 3Year 4Year 5Year 6 Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Maintenance $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Custodial $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Ar t s $ 5 8 8 , 6 7 1 $ 6 0 6 , 3 3 1 $ 6 2 4 , 5 2 1 $ 6 4 3 , 2 5 7 $ 6 6 2 , 5 5 4 $ 6 8 2 , 4 3 1 Ac t i v e Ad u l t s $ 1 0 7 , 3 6 4 $ 1 1 0 , 5 8 5 $ 1 1 3 , 9 0 2 $ 1 1 7 , 3 2 0 $ 1 2 0 , 8 3 9 $ 1 2 4 , 4 6 4 Fi t n e s s Pr o g r a m s $ 4 6 , 8 0 0 $ 4 8 , 2 0 4 $ 4 9 , 6 5 0 $ 5 1 , 1 4 0 $ 5 2 , 6 7 4 $ 5 4 , 2 5 4 Fa c i l i t y Re n t a l s $ 9 4 , 1 0 0 $ 9 6 , 9 2 3 $ 9 9 , 8 3 1 $ 1 0 2 , 8 2 6 $ 1 0 5 , 9 1 0 $ 1 0 9 , 0 8 8 Ca f é $ 7 1 4 , 4 0 0 $ 7 3 5 , 8 3 2 $ 7 5 7 , 9 0 7 $ 7 8 0 , 6 4 4 $ 8 0 4 , 0 6 3 $ 8 2 8 , 1 8 5 To t a l $1 , 5 5 1 , 3 3 5 $ 1 , 5 9 7 , 8 7 5 $ 1 , 6 4 5 , 8 1 1 $ 1 , 6 9 5 , 1 8 6 $ 1 , 7 4 6 , 0 4 1 $ 1 , 7 9 8 , 4 2 2 Ex p e n d i t u r e s Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n $ 5 2 9 , 6 5 0 $ 5 3 9 , 7 9 7 $ 5 5 0 , 3 4 1 $ 5 6 1 , 2 9 9 $ 5 7 2 , 6 8 5 $ 5 8 4 , 5 1 8 Ma i n t e n a n c e $ 1 5 6 , 4 0 5 $ 1 5 8 , 1 4 7 $ 1 5 9 , 9 5 5 $ 1 6 1 , 8 3 2 $ 1 6 3 , 7 8 1 $ 1 6 5 , 8 0 5 Cu s t o d i a l $ 1 4 6 , 0 5 6 $ 1 4 6 , 4 7 2 $ 1 4 6 , 9 0 2 $ 1 4 7 , 3 4 6 $ 1 4 7 , 8 0 5 $ 1 4 8 , 2 8 0 Ar t s $ 5 5 5 , 1 8 0 $ 5 7 2 , 8 4 2 $ 5 9 1 , 1 9 2 $ 6 1 0 , 2 5 6 $ 6 3 0 , 0 6 4 $ 6 5 0 , 6 4 3 Ac t i v e Ad u l t s $ 1 4 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 9 , 1 0 5 $ 1 5 3 , 3 7 0 $ 1 5 7 , 8 0 0 $ 1 6 2 , 4 0 1 $ 1 6 7 , 1 8 1 Fi t n e s s Pr o g r a m s $ 4 6 , 3 5 8 $ 4 7 , 5 5 0 $ 4 8 , 7 8 9 $ 5 0 , 0 7 8 $ 5 1 , 4 1 7 $ 5 2 , 8 1 0 Fa c i l i t y Re n t a l s $ 2 4 , 5 7 0 $ 2 4 , 6 8 0 $ 2 4 , 7 9 4 $ 2 4 , 9 1 2 $ 2 5 , 0 3 5 $ 2 5 , 1 6 3 Ca f é $ 6 0 7 , 2 4 0 $ 6 3 1 , 5 3 0 $ 6 5 6 , 7 9 1 $ 6 8 3 , 0 6 2 $ 7 1 0 , 3 8 5 $ 7 3 8 , 8 0 0 To t a l $2 , 2 1 0 , 4 5 8 $ 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 2 2 $ 2 , 3 3 2 , 1 3 3 $ 2 , 3 9 6 , 5 8 5 $ 2 , 4 6 3 , 5 7 4 $ 2 , 5 3 3 , 2 0 0 To t a l Co s t Re c o v e r y 7 0 % 7 0 % 7 1 % 7 1 % 7 1 % 7 1 % OP E R A T I N G R E V E N U E S & E X P E N D I T U R E S PR O F O R M A | S I X Y E A R The CITY of EDINA FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 20 TH A N K Y O U . City of Edina hga commission number 3857-001-00 1 Community Center Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Proposed Community Facility Capital Costs Operating Costs Acknowledgements 2. VISIONING AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Information Gathering Information Review 3. FACILITY PROGRAMMING Process Preferred Program 5. SITE AND BUILDING PLANNING Process Preferred Fit Plan 6. CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE 7. MARKET ANALYSIS 8. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS APPENDIX Appendix A: 17 February 2016 City Council Presentation Appendix B: 10 March 2016 Task Force Presentation Appendix C: Capital Cost Estimate Detail 2 9 May 2016 City of Edina 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The site, former home of public works, is a now vacant parcel that represents a meaningful redevelopment opportunity at the heart of the Grandview District. The City of Edina owns this parcel of land bounded by Arcadia Avenue to the east and Eden Avenue to the south. The City commissioned this Feasibility Study with a team comprised of HGA Architects & Engineers, PROS Consulting, and Sutton & Associates to evaluate a potential community facility on the north portion of the site. The scope of the Feasibility Study included needs assessment, market analysis, building space programming, site fit options, massing studies, development of a preferred design alternative, capital and operational cost estimating. The quantitative and qualitative results described in the Feasibility Study are intended to assist the City of Edina in strategic planning for the future of the Grandview site. Upon completion of the Feasibility Study, findings were presented to the Edina City Council to facilitate future deliberations and decisions. hga commission number 3857-001-00 3 Community Center Feasibility Study Proposed Community Facility The proposed community facility is a two-story, approximately seventy-thousand square foot building with spaces designed for art center, active adult, community gathering, and wellness programs. The building is sited with the main entry facing east opening to an entry plaza and passenger drop-off area. Main parking for the facility is located below the building providing opportunities for open green space and landscaped areas. The Feasibility Study design work has been coordinated with neighborhood transit systems currently being proposed by a transportation study commissioned by the City of Edina and being completed simultaneously with this study. 4 9 May 2016 City of Edina Capital Costs A summary of estimated capital costs are provided below. Estimated costs are subdivided into two primary categories: construction cost and soft cost. Additional project costs, commonly referred to as “soft costs” are separated from construction costs in the estimate. Soft costs include, but are not limited to, the following: geo-technical report, site survey, architecture and engineering fees, permits, testing, Owner legal and administrative fees, furniture and equipment, and other direct vendor services (data, telecommunications, A/V technologies. For a community center facility soft costs are estimated at approximately 25% of the total construction cost. The estimate is based on both the building space program and plans. Exterior materials and interior finishes are assumed to be of a similar quality level as the existing Edina City Hall. Mechanical HVAC systems are assumed to be located on the exterior rooftop and enclosed with a mechanical screen wall. Costs include a contingency to account for design changes and unforeseen construction issues. The estimate also includes an anticipated construction cost escalation between the time of this report and mid-point of construction. hga commission number 3857-001-00 5 Community Center Feasibility Study Operating Costs Staff has worked with the firm PROS Consulting and Sutton & Associates to assist with an operating cost estimate. The consultant team took the program components outlined in this report to design an operating budget and revenue projection. The estimated annual expense to operate a facility of this size is estimated to be $2,210,458. That includes the anticipated full- time employees, part-time staff, utilities, program expenses, supplies and other miscellaneous items needed to run a community facility. The corresponding revenue projections on an annual basis are estimated to be $1,551,335. The revenue projections include memberships and daily admissions (anticipating several options) as well as rental revenue obtained from the seminar rooms and event venue. The difference is ($659,123). The anticipated recovery rate at year one is 70%. Pro Forma Revenues & Expenditures EDINA GRANDVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER ‐ Option B ONE YEAR SNAPSHOT SUMMARY of PRO FORMA SERVICE TITLE Revenues Expenditures Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Cost Recovery ‐ Percent Administration $0.00 $529,650.00 ($529,650.00)0% Maintenance $0.00 $156,405.37 ($156,405.37)0% Custodial $0.00 $146,055.62 ($146,055.62)0% Arts $588,671.00 $555,180.00 $33,491.00 106% Active Adults $107,364.00 $145,000.00 ($37,636.00)74% Fitness Programs $46,800.00 $46,357.50 $442.50 101% Facility Rentals $94,100.00 $24,570.00 $69,530.00 383% Café $714,400.00 $607,240.00 $107,160.00 118% Total $1,551,335.00 $2,210,458.49 ($659,123.49)70% 6 9 May 2016 City of Edina Acknowledgments The Feasibility Study process was informed and guided by a diverse group of stakeholders representing multiple areas of expertise within the City of Edina. Each individual graciously provided their time and expertise to ensure the completion of a comprehensive Feasibility Study that best meets the goals of the project. The design team received guidance and direction from City of Edina staff, Arts & Culture Commission, Park Board, Edina Community Education and City Council. The design team included design professionals from HGA Architects, Engineers and Planners responsible for building programming, site analysis, site fit planning and construction cost estimating. Operational analysis was conducted as a joint effort by PROS Consulting and Sutton & Associates. Stakeholders and members of the design team are acknowledged below: City of Edina Team Ann Kattreh Parks and Recreation Director Susan Faus Parks and Recreation Assistant Director Michael Frey Donna Tilsner Amanda Clarke Art Center General Manager Recreation Supervisor – Senior Center Recreation Supervisor Arts & Culture Commission Ray Meifert Anne Miller Park Board Ellen Jones Koren Nelson Edina Community Education Val Burke Cheryl Gunness Design/Consultant Team Victor Pechaty, AIA Nancy Blankfard, AIA Michael Anderson Mark McDonald Jeff Bransford, PMP, CPRP Michael Svetz George Sutton Sara Shaylie HGA – Design Principal HGA – Project Manager HGA – Architectural Designer HGA – Cost Estimating PROS – Project Manager PROS Sutton Sutton hga commission number 3857-001-00 7 Community Center Feasibility Study 2. VISIONING AND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Information Gathering Identifying a clear project vision was the first step to understand program needs for the proposed community facility. This was a process of collecting information from multiple inputs including user groups, residents, and a market analysis. The information collected was synthesized to produce a comprehensive understanding of the project needs. User Group Interviews The consultant team met with seven user groups to collect information about current programs offered, areas of program need, and potential synergies in a multigenerational community facility. The following is a list of the user groups that were interviewed. Active Adult Art Center Communication & Technology (CTS) Community Education Historical Society Fitness & Wellness Youth Community Open House An early community open house was held with an emphasis on program visioning. The community was asked to review and comment on programs being explored for the proposed community facility. Over two-hundred comments were collected, contributing to an increased understanding of the project needs. 8 9 May 2016 City of Edina Market Analysis A comprehensive market analysis was conducted by the consultant team to provide an understanding of the population within a twenty minute drive time from the location of the proposed community facility. The analysis evaluated population demographics, national and local trends, comparable neighboring community facilities, and a comprehensive review of a past community survey. The complete Market Analysis can be found in a later section of this report. Information Review The Feasibility Study started with a strong framework of information gathered by the City over the past several years including a preliminary art center program for the proposed facility. The input received during the visioning and needs assessment phase identified additional building program components that contribute to the goal of creating a vibrant multigenerational community facility. Throughout the process, the consultant team worked closely with the Task Force, Park Board, and Arts & Culture Commission to review and synthesize information collected. These three groups provided insight and direction to the consultant team on a regular basis, culminating with a presentation to City Council. hga commission number 3857-001-00 9 Community Center Feasibility Study 3. FACILITY PROGRAMMING Process A total of six program options were developed and accompanied by associated capital and operating costs. These options were presented to City Council in a work session in February 2016. City Council voted and directed the consultant team to pursue “Program Option B”. The 17 February 2016 City Council presentation containing a full list of the program options can be found in the Appendix of this report. Preferred Program The following building space program represents the direction received from City Council. The program is divided into groupings that are further described below. Art Center The Art Center programs reflect expanded program opportunities beyond the capabilities of the existing art center facility. The programs in this group include galleries, visual arts studios, ceramics, metal arts, and glass/jewelry spaces. Active Adult The Active Adult programs are based on the existing senior center facility. The programs in this group include commons area, multipurpose classrooms, seminar room, and game area. Community Gathering The Community Gathering program group is comprised of four subgroups: Commons, Flexible Meeting, Food Service, and Event Venue. The Commons subgroup includes the building lobby and reception desk. This area serves as the front door for the facility and is intended to provide a welcoming experience for all guests. The Flexible Meeting subgroup includes a multipurpose classroom and seminar room. These areas are intended to serve the diverse needs of the multiple programs in the facility. The Food Service subgroup includes a café restaurant, catering support, and culinary arts instruction. These programs are grouped together with the interest of identifying operational efficiencies in room layout and building services. The Event Venue subgroup is comprised of a versatile venue space and the associated support programs. This program can support banquets, lectures, theater, music performances, among many other uses. The capacity of the venue ranges from 250 people in a banquet setting to 400 people during a performance. The catering kitchen will likely need a convenient connection to serve the venue in a variety of functions. Wellness Wellness is comprised of three multipurpose studios to accommodate group fitness and wellness activities. Since trends in fitness evolve, these spaces should be designed to adapt and meet changing needs. We are proposing two medium and one large room to accommodate a variety of class sizes and needs. Appropriate storage needs to be adjacent to the rooms to hold equipment such as mats, balls, bikes, etc. 10 9 May 2016 City of Edina Administration The Administration includes staff and director offices needed to operate a community facility. This area would also include a conference room and work room to accommodate the operational needs of these individuals. Building Support Building Support is comprised of spaces that allow a community facility to function. The design team has assessed the storage, mechanical, restroom, and service needs for the facility and included the appropriate space allocation for each element. Program Summary Art Center 13,495 nsf Active Adult 6,890 nsf Community Gathering 13,220 nsf Commons (1400 nsf) Flexible Meeting (1500 nsf) Food Service (3200 nsf) Event Venue (7120 nsf) Wellness 5,450 nsf Administration 2,262 nsf Building Support 5,110 nsf Total Building Net Area 46,427 nsf Non-assignable 22,867 nsf Allowance based on 67% efficiency Total Building Gross Area 69,294 gsf hga commission number 3857-001-00 11 Community Center Feasibility Study 12 9 May 2016 City of Edina hga commission number 3857-001-00 13 Community Center Feasibility Study 14 9 May 2016 City of Edina hga commission number 3857-001-00 15 Community Center Feasibility Study 16 9 May 2016 City of Edina hga commission number 3857-001-00 17 Community Center Feasibility Study 4. SITE AND BUILDING PLANNING Process The building space program was illustrated in diagram form and tested, to scale, on the project site. Two feasible fit plan options emerged as programmatic organization alternatives. The design team compared strengths and weaknesses of each fit plan option with the Task Force, Arts & Culture Commission, and Park Board. The full 10 March 2016 Task Force presentation containing the initial two fit plan options can be found in the Appendix of this report. Preferred Fit Plan Positive elements of each of the fit plan options were combined into a preferred design alternative and developed in more detail, including plans and rendered massing studies. The preferred design alternative represents a facility that addresses the needs of the City and adheres to the Seven Guiding Principles of the Grandview District. A summary description of the preferred design alternative is listed below and refers to the fit plans and massing perspectives on the following pages. The fit plans include the entire Grandview site to illustrate connections to the proposed residential building, district parking, and neighborhood transit study. Parking is comprised of two levels below the community center and three levels below the proposed residential building. The two-story community center is oriented with the main entry plaza facing east. Guests can also enter the main building lobby through an entrance that connects to the proposed transit station. Outdoor green space is provided through both the Entry Plaza and Arts & Wellness Roof Terrace. 920’ 930’ 940’950’ UP RE S I D E N T I A L P A R K I N G (9 7 S T A L L S ) 90 4 ’ PARKING FOOTPRINT ABOVE P3 0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 ’ Pa r k i n g P l a n Gr a n d v i e w S i t e F i t | E d i n a , M N 920’ 930’ 940’950’ UP D N UP RE S I D E N T I A L P A R K I N G (7 0 S T A L L S ) BU S S T O P 91 6 ’ CO M M U N I T Y C E N T E R P A R K I N G (197 STALLS)0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 ’ Pa r k i n g P l a n Gr a n d v i e w S i t e F i t | E d i n a , M N P2 920’ 930’ 940’950’PROPOSED TRANSIT CENTER S E R V I C E P A R K I N G RE S I D E N T I A L P A R K I N G (6 8 S T A L L S ) CO M M U N I T Y C E N T E R P A R K I N G (171 STALLS) DR O P - O F F LO A D I N G DO C K 92 8 ’ DN DN UP P E R P A T H LO W E R P A T H BU S S T O P G US YO UNG LN 0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 ’ Pa r k i n g P l a n Gr a n d v i e w S i t e F i t | E d i n a , M N P1 920’ 930’ 940’950’ PR O P O S E D RE S I D E N T I A L OU T D O O R KI L N Y A R D DN 94 2 ’ 948’OPEN TO ABOVE BU S S T O P PEDESTRIAN / VEHICLE BRIDGE PROPOSED TRANSIT CENTER UP P E R P A T H LO W E R P A T H G US YO UNG LN BICYCLE RACKS S E R V I C E P A R K I N G DROP-OFF DROP-OFFENTRY PLAZA AR T C E N T E R G a l l e r y S t u d i o P o t t e r y / C e r a m i c s M e t a l A r t s G l a s s / J e w e l r y G i f t S h o p S t o r a g e AC T I V E A D U L T C o m m o n s M u l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s r o o m S e m i n a r R o o m G a m e R o o m S t o r a g e BU I L D I N G S U P P O R T B u i l d i n g S t o r a g e M e c h a n i c a l / E l e c t r i c a l R e s t r o o m s AD M I N I S T R A T I O N O f f i c e s WE L L N E S S W e l l n e s s S t u d i o s CO M M U N I T Y G A T H E R I N G L o b b y R e c e p t i o n C o m m o n s F l e x i b l e M e e t i n g M u l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s r o o m S e m i n a r R o o m F o o d S e r v i c e C a f e R e s t a u r a n t C a t e r i n g S u p p o r t C u l i n a r y A r t s I n s t r u c t i o n E v e n t V e n u e V e n u e D r e s s i n g S u i t e s C o l l a p s i b l e R i s e r S t o r a g e T a b l e & C h a i r S t o r a g e E v e n t S u p p o r t 1 3 4 6 7 21 3 4 5 3 41112367845 6 7 4 3 1 1 5 4 322 21 2 3 5 1 4 766 813 3 3 3 5 5 AR T C E N T E R N R CE N CE N G a l l e r y ry ry S t u d i o S t P o t t e r y / C e r a m i c s cs tt e mi c s r / C e r a / C e r a M e t a l A r t s A G l a s s / J e w e l r y J y G l a we l r y we l r y G i f t S h o p Gi f t S h o p S t o r ag e S t o r a g e St o r a g e 1 3 4 6 7 AC T I V E A D U UL T U UL T T C o m m o n s M u l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s sr o o m sr ss om om m m S e m i n a r R o o m G a m e R o o m S t o r a g e 21 3 4 5 NG G NG G N N N CO M M U N I T Y G A T H TH H HE R I N HE RI N RI N N N N TH N NG G N N NG G N H H H L o b b y R e c e p t i o n C o m m o n s F l e x i b l e M e e t i n g M u l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s r o o m S e m i n a r R o o m F o o d S e r v i c e rv i c C a f e R e s t a u r a n t au r a fe R e C a t e r i n g S u p p o r t rt Su C a t e r i n C u l i n a r y A r t s I n s t r u c t i o n ct i o s Cu l i n a y A E v e n t V e n u e t V e n u ve V e n u e en D r e s s i n g S u i t e s es s i n g S u Dr e s s i n g S u i t e s C o l l a p s i b l e R i s e r S t o r a g e C o l l a p s i b l e R i s e r S t o ap s i b l e R Co l l a p s i b l e R i s e r T a b l e & C h a i r S t o r a g e T a b l e & C h a i r S t o r a g e & C h a i r S bl e & C h a i r S t o r a E v e n t S u p p o r t E S e 1 2 3 6 7 845 WE L L N E S S E W L S N W e l l n e s s S t u d i o s W l St u d i o s s AD M I N I S T R A T I O N M D NI S T R A T I O N TR A ST R A T O f f i c e s f s 1 BU I L D I N G S U P P O R T U B LD I N G S U DI N G B u i l d i n g S t o r a g e B u i l d i n g S t o r a ui l d i n g S M e c h a n i c a l / E l e c t r i c a l M e c h a n i c a Me c h a n R e s t r o o m s R e s t r o o m Re s t r 3 4 Le v e l 1 P l a n Gr a n d v i e w S i t e F i t | E d i n a , M N 0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 ’ 1 920’ 930’ 940’950’962’ AR T & W E L L N E S S RO O F T E R R A C E OPEN TO BELOW PR O P O S E D RE S I D E N T I A L OU T D O O R KI L N Y A R D PROPOSED TRANSIT CENTER UP P E R P A T H LO W E R P A T H BU S S T O P G US YO UNG LN ENTRY PLAZAPEDESTRIAN / VEHICLE BRIDGE 52 2 2 2 2 10 9 11121313 1 1 1 5 52 3 3 3 AR T C E N T E R G a l l e r y S t u d i o P o t t e r y / C e r a m i c s M e t a l A r t s G l a s s / J e w e l r y G i f t S h o p S t o r a g e AC T I V E A D U L T C o m m o n s M u l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s r o o m S e m i n a r R o o m G a m e R o o m S t o r a g e BU I L D I N G S U P P O R T B u i l d i n g S t o r a g e M e c h a n i c a l / E l e c t r i c a l R e s t r o o m s AD M I N I S T R A T I O N O f f i c e s WE L L N E S S W e l l n e s s S t u d i o s CO M M U N I T Y G A T H E R I N G L o b b y R e c e p t i o n C o m m o n s F l e x i b l e M e e t i n g M u l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s r o o m S e m i n a r R o o m F o o d S e r v i c e C a f e R e s t a u r a n t C a t e r i n g S u p p o r t C u l i n a r y A r t s I n s t r u c t i o n E v e n t V e n u e V e n u e D r e s s i n g S u i t e s C o l l a p s i b l e R i s e r S t o r a g e T a b l e & C h a i r S t o r a g e E v e n t S u p p o r t 2 5 109 11 12 13 2 3 413 AR T C E N T E R N R CE N CE N G a l l e r y ry ry S t u d i o S t P o t t e r y / C e r a m i c s cs tt e mi c s r / C e r a / C e r a M e t a l A r t s A G l a s s / J e w e l r y J y G l a we l r y we l r y G i f t S h o p Gi f t S h o p S t o r ag e S t o r a g e St o r a g e 2 5 AC T I V E A D U UL T U UL T T C o m m o n s M u l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s sr o o m sr ss om om m m S e m i n a r R o o m G a m e R o o m S t o r a g e CO M M U N I T Y G A T H NG G NG G N N N TH H HE R I N HE RI N RI N TH N N N N NG G N N NG G N H H H L o b b y R e c e p t i o n C o m m o n s F l e x i b l e M e e t i n g M u l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s r o o m S e m i n a r R o o m F o o d S e r v i c e rv i c C a f e R e s t a u r a n t ta u r a af e R C a t e r i n g S u p p o r t rt Su C a t e r i n C u l i n a r y A r t s I n s t r u c t i o n ct i o s Cu l i n a y A E v e n t V e n u e t V e n u ve V e n u e en D r e s s i n g S u i t e s es s i n g S u Dr e s s i n g S u i t e s C o l l a p s i b l e R i s e r S t o r a g e C o l l a p s i b l e R i s e r S t o ap s i b l e R Co l l a p s i b l e R i s e r T a b l e & C h a i r S t o r a g e T a b l e & C h a i r S t o r a g e & C h a i r S bl e & C h a i r S t o r a E v e n t S u p p o r t E S e 109 1 1 12 13 3 WE L L N E S S E W L S N W e l l n e s s S t u d i o s W l St u d i o s s 1 AD M I N I S T R A T I O N M D NI S T R A T I O N TR A ST R A T O f f i c e s f s BU I L D I N G S U P P O R T U B LD I N G S U DI N G B u i l d i n g S t o r a g e B u i l d i n g S t o r a ui l d i n g S M e c h a n i c a l / E l e c t r i c a l M e c h a n i c a Me c h a n R e s t r o o m s R e s t r o o m Re s t r 2 3 4 Le v e l 2 P l a n Gr a n d v i e w S i t e F i t | E d i n a , M N 0 2 5 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 ’ 2 EA S T A E R I A L EA S T P E R S P E C T I V E SO U T H E A S T A E R I A L 26 9 May 2016 City of Edina 5. CAPITAL COST ESTIMATE hga commission number 3857-001-00 27 Community Center Feasibility Study 6. MARKET ANALYSIS Market Profile The Market Profile provides an understanding of the population within a 20 minute drive time from the proposed location for the Grandview Community Center. This analysis is reflective of the total population and findings relative to levels of interest in cultural, fitness and wellness programming demonstrate similarities of demographic characteristics of participants including age segments, educational and income levels, race, and ethnicity. It is important to note that future projections are all based on historical patterns and unforeseen circumstances during or after the time of the projections could have a significant bearing on the validity of the final projections. Methodology Demographic data used for the analysis was obtained from U.S. Census Bureau and from Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI), the largest research and development organization dedicated to Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and specializing in population projections and market trends. All data was acquired in December 2015 and reflects actual numbers as reported in the 2010 Censuses, and estimates for 2015 and 2020 as obtained by ESRI. Straight line linear regression was utilized for projected 2025 and 2030 demographics. The target area boundaries were utilized as the demographic analysis boundary shown in the image to the right. 28 9 May 2016 City of Edina Race and Ethnicity Definitions The minimum categories for data on race and ethnicity for Federal statistics, program administrative reporting, and civil rights compliance reporting are defined as below. The Census 2010 data on race are not directly comparable with data from the 2000 Census and earlier censuses; caution must be used when interpreting changes in the racial composition of the US population over time. The latest (Census 2010) definitions and nomenclature are used within this analysis. American Indian – This includes a person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America), and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment Asian – This includes a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam Black – This includes a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander – This includes a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands White – This includes a person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa Hispanic or Latino – This is an ethnic distinction, a subset of a race as defined by the Federal Government; this includes a person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race hga commission number 3857-001-00 29 Community Center Feasibility Study 19 , 6 3 4 20 , 1 6 4 20 , 8 2 3 21 , 3 9 6 21 , 9 9 1 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION Demographic Analysis An analysis of the local demographic makeup is helpful when understanding the population of the service area of the Grandview Community Center. This analysis is reflective of the total population of the service areas and its key characteristics such as age segments, income levels, race, and ethnicity. It is important to note that future projections will be based on historical patterns and the potential for unforeseen circumstances during or after the time of the use and economic projections. The shifts in these issues will have a significant bearing on the validity of the final projections offered in this study. 10 Minute Drive Time Service Area Population The population of the 10 minute drive time service area for Grandview Community Center has increased slowly since the last official US Census from 19,634 residents in 2010 to 20,164 in 2015. This represents an increase in the total population by an annual rate of 0.5%. This rate is below the national growth averages of 1% annually. Projecting forward, the population is expected to rise slightly above the current rate (0.6%) for the next 15 years. Based on those assumptions, the 10 minute drive time service area is expected to have approximately 21,991 residents in 2030. 30 9 May 2016 City of Edina Age Segmentation By 2030, it is projected that the active adult population (55+) will make up 41.2% of the population in the 10 minute drive time service area of the Grandview Community Center. This age group echoes a national trend as a result of increased life expectancies. The movement of the baby boomer generation through the lifespan also contributes to an aging population. Despite the growing active adult population, the second highest percentage of population will be youth with approximately 2 out of 10 people being under the age of 18 in 2030. 27.0%25.9%24.3%23.2%22.0% 12.8%14.0%13.9%14.6%15.0% 30.8%27.7%26.2%23.8%21.7% 29.4%32.5%35.7%38.5%41.2% 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION BY AGE SEGMENT <18 18‐34 35‐54 55+ hga commission number 3857-001-00 31 Community Center Feasibility Study $6 0 , 4 8 2 $3 0 , 9 1 3 $2 8 , 1 5 5 $9 8 , 8 1 4 $5 9 , 8 3 6 $5 3 , 0 4 6 EDINA CITY MINNESOTA U.S.A. COMPARATIVE INCOME CHARACTERISTICS Per Capita Income Median Household Income Household Income As observed in the table below, the 10 minute drive time service area of the Grandview Community Center has income levels well above that of the State of Minnesota and the country, as a whole. 32 9 May 2016 City of Edina 92.76%91.62%90.36%89.28%88.24% 0.52%0.58%0.65%0.71%0.76%1.85%2.12%2.40%2.65%2.89% 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION BY RACE White Alone Black Alone American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Some Other Race Race From a race standpoint, the service area does not have a diverse landscape. The diversity in the community is projected to stay relatively the same through the next 15 years. hga commission number 3857-001-00 33 Community Center Feasibility Study 15 Minute Drive Time Service Area Population Population The population of a 15 minute drive time service area for the Grandview Community Center has increased slowly since the last official US Census from 153,635 residents in 2010 to 158.777 in 2015. This represents an increase in the total population by an annual rate of 0.7%. This rate is below the national growth averages of 1% annually. Projecting forward, the population is expected to rise slightly above the current rate (0.8%) for the next 15 years. Based on those assumptions, the 15 minute drive time service area is expected to have approximately 177.928 residents in 2030. 15 3 , 6 3 5 15 8 , 7 7 7 16 5 , 9 5 1 17 1 , 7 7 0 17 7 , 9 2 8 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION 34 9 May 2016 City of Edina Age Segmentation By 2030, it is projected that the active adult population (55+) will make up 38.0% of the population in the 15 minute drive time service area of the Grandview Community Center. This age group echoes a national trend as a result of increased life expectancies. The movement of the baby boomer generation through the lifespan also contributes to an aging population. 20.9%20.7%20.0%19.7%19.3% 22.2%21.0%20.1%19.2%18.3% 27.9%26.5%26.1%25.1%24.4% 29.0%31.7%33.8%36.0%38.0% 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION BY AGE SEGMENT <18 18‐34 35‐54 55+ hga commission number 3857-001-00 35 Community Center Feasibility Study Household Income As observed in the table below, the 15 minute drive time service area of the Grandview Community Center has income levels well above that of the State of Minnesota and the country, as a whole. $4 8 , 2 7 9 $3 0 , 9 1 3 $2 8 , 1 5 5 $7 1 , 3 7 4 $5 9 , 8 3 6 $5 3 , 0 4 6 EDINA CITY MINNESOTA U.S.A. COMPARATIVE INCOME CHARACTERISTICS Per Capita Income Median Household Income 36 9 May 2016 City of Edina Race From a race standpoint, the service area does not have a diverse landscape. The diversity in the community is projected to stay relatively the same through the next 15 years. 84.27%82.43%80.32%78.62%76.98% 1.83%1.95%2.15%2.28%2.42%2.55%2.84%3.16%3.42%3.68% 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION BY RACE White Alone Black Alone American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Some Other Race hga commission number 3857-001-00 37 Community Center Feasibility Study 20 Minute Drive Time Service Area Population The population of a 20 minute drive time service area for the Grandview Community Center has increased slowly since the last official US Census from 522,957 residents in 2010 to 537,958 in 2015. This represents an increase in the total population by an annual rate of 0.6%. This rate is below the national growth averages of 1% annually. Projecting forward, the population is expected to rise at slightly above the current rate (0.7%) for the next 15 years. Based on those assumptions, the 20 minute drive time service area is expected to have approximately 597,219 residents in 2030. 52 2 , 9 5 7 53 7 , 9 5 8 56 0 , 7 3 6 57 8 , 3 2 9 59 7 , 2 1 9 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION 38 9 May 2016 City of Edina Age Segmentation By 2030, it is projected that the active adult population (55+) will make up 33.9% of the population in the 20 minute drive time service area of the Grandview Community Center. This age group echoes a national trend as a result of increased life expectancies. The movement of the baby boomer generation through the lifespan also contributes to an aging population. 20.9%20.6%20.1%19.7%19.4% 26.4%25.0%23.8%22.7%21.6% 27.7%26.6%26.4%25.7%25.2% 25.1%27.8%29.7%31.9%33.9% 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION BY AGE SEGMENT <18 18‐34 35‐54 55+ hga commission number 3857-001-00 39 Community Center Feasibility Study Household Income As observed in the table below, the 20 minute drive time service area of the Grandview Community Center has income levels above that of the State of Minnesota and the country, as a whole. $4 0 , 0 6 4 $3 0 , 9 1 3 $2 8 , 1 5 5 $6 1 , 9 4 5 $5 9 , 8 3 6 $5 3 , 0 4 6 EDINA CITY MINNESOTA U.S.A. COMPARATIVE INCOME CHARACTERISTICS Per Capita Income Median Household Income 40 9 May 2016 City of Edina Race From a race standpoint, the service area has a diverse landscape. The diversity in the community is projected to stay relatively the same through the next 15 years with the most significant change being the increase in the Hispanic population. Demographic Summary Each of the measured service areas around the Grandview Community Center are demographically similar and project to be similar in 15 years. The growth is slightly below that of national averages over the next fifteen years. It is anticipated that the makeup of the service areas population will change as it is expected to age over the next 15 years, however, will remain relatively affluent with income levels above both state and national medians. 76.62%74.67%72.38%70.53%68.73% 10.49%11.26%12.17%12.90%13.61% 3.68%3.83%4.12%4.29%4.48%3.27%3.59%3.92%4.21%4.48% 2010 CENSUS 2015 ESTIMATE 2020 PROJECTION 2025 PROJECTION 2030 PROJECTION POPULATION BY RACE White Alone Black Alone American Indian Asian Pacific Islander Some Other Race hga commission number 3857-001-00 41 Community Center Feasibility Study Market Trends This section presents leisure, recreation, and arts participation trends for activities that are under consideration for the Grandview Community Center. Analyses of both national and local trends are presented. National Recreation Trends The following tables summarize the findings from the Sports & Fitness Industry Association’s (SFIA) Sports, Fitness and Leisure Activities Topline Participation Report, a leading source for sport and fitness research commonly used in assessing program feasibility. The study is based on interviews regarding activity participation carried out in 2014 from more than 19,000 individuals and households. Summary of National Participatory Trends Analysis 1. Number of “in-actives” decreased slightly, those ‘active to a healthy level’ on the rise a. “In-actives” down 0.4% in 2013, from 80.4 million to 80.2 million b. Approximately one-third of Americans (ages 6+) are active to a healthy level 2. Most popular sport and recreational activities a. Fitness Walking (117 million) b. Running/Jogging (54 million) c. Treadmill (48 million) 3. Most participated in team sports a. Basketball (23.7 million) b. Tennis (17.7 million) c. Baseball (13.3 million) 4. Activities most rapidly growing over last five years a. Adventure Racing – up 159% b. Non-traditional/Off-road Triathlon – up 156% c. Traditional/Road Triathlon – up 140% d. Squash – up 115% e. Rugby – up 81% 5. Activities most rapidly declining over last five years a. Wrestling – down 45% b. In-line Roller Skating – down 40% c. Touch Football – down 32% d. Horseback Riding – down 29% e. Slow-pitch Softball – down 29% 42 9 May 2016 City of Edina The information released by SFIA reveals that the most popular sport and recreational activities include: fitness walking, treadmill, running/jogging, free weights and bicycling. Most of these activities appeal to both young and old alike, can be done in most environments, are enjoyed regardless of level of skill, and have minimal economic barriers to entry. These popular activities also have appeal because of their social benefits. For example, although fitness activities are mainly self-directed, people enjoy walking and biking with other individuals because it can offer a degree of camaraderie. Fitness walking has remained the most popular activity of the past decade by a large margin. Walking participation during the latest year data was available (2013), reported over 117 million Americans had walked for fitness at least once. From a traditional team sport standpoint, basketball ranks highest among all sports, with nearly 24 million people reportedly participating in 2013. Team sports that have experienced significant growth in participation are rugby, lacrosse, field hockey, ice hockey, gymnastics, beach volleyball, and ultimate Frisbee– all of which have experienced double digit growth over the last five years. Most recently, rugby, field hockey, and lacrosse underwent the most rapid growth among team sports from 2012 to 2013. In the past year, there has been a slight 0.4% decrease of “in-actives” in America, from 80.4 million in 2012 to 80.2 million in 2013. According to the Physical Activity Council, an “inactive” is defined as an individual that doesn’t take part in any “active” sport. Even more encouraging is that an estimated 33.9% of Americans above the age of 6 are active to a healthy level, taking part in a high calorie burning activity three or more times per week. hga commission number 3857-001-00 43 Community Center Feasibility Study 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 12‐13 11‐13 10‐13 09‐13 08‐13 Basketball 26,108 25,131 25,156 24,790 23,708 23,669 ‐0.2%‐4.5%‐5.9%‐5.8%‐9.3% Gymnastics 3,975 3,952 4,418 4,824 5,115 4,972 ‐2.8% 3.1% 12.5% 25.8% 25.1% Ice Hockey 1,871 2,018 2,140 2,131 2,363 2,393 1.3% 12.3% 11.8% 18.6% 27.9% Racquetball 4,611 4,784 4,603 4,357 4,070 3,824 ‐6.0%‐12.2%‐16.9%‐20.1%‐17.1% Soccer (Indoor) 4,487 4,825 4,920 4,631 4,617 4,803 4.0% 3.7%‐2.4%‐0.5% 7.0% Squash 659 796 1,031 1,112 1,290 1,414 9.6% 27.2% 37.1% 77.6% 114.6% Tennis 17,749 18,546 18,719 17,772 17,020 17,678 3.9%‐0.5%‐5.6%‐4.7%‐0.4% Volleyball (Court) 7,588 7,737 7,315 6,662 6,384 6,433 0.8%‐3.4%‐12.1%‐16.9%‐15.2% Legend:Large Increase (greater than 25%) Moderate Increase (0% to 25%) Moderate Decrease (0% to ‐25%) Large Decrease (less than ‐25%) National Participatory Trends ‐ General Sports NOTE: Participation figures are in 000's for the US population ages 6 and over Participation Levels % ChangeActivity National Trends in General Sports The following table depicts national participatory trends for general sports that could potentially take place in an indoor recreation center. Squash has seen substantial increases in participation in recent years, as the sport has witnessed a 9.6% increase from 2012-2013 and nearly 115% growth over the last five years. In the same five year span, participation figures for ice hockey (increased by 27.9%) and indoor soccer (increased by 7%) have underwent notable growth. Traditionally popular indoor sports, such as basketball (23.7 million participants) and court volleyball (6.4 million participants), have experienced moderate decreases in recent years, although court volleyball experienced minimal growth in the last year. Overall participation in tennis peaked in 2010, and has been following a declining trend in recent years, but in the last year participation increased, causing the 2013 figures to mirror those of 2008. It should be noted that participation in tennis includes both indoor and outdoor, and there are not statistics available to differentiate between the two types. 44 9 May 2016 City of Edina 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 12‐13 11‐13 10‐13 09‐13 08‐13 Aquatic Exercise 9,512 8,965 8,947 9,042 9,177 8,483 ‐7.6%‐6.2%‐5.2%‐5.4%‐10.8% Swimming (Competition) N/A N/A N/A 2,363 2,502 2,638 5.4% 11.6% N/A N/A N/A Swimming (Fitness) N/A N/A N/A 21,517 23,216 26,354 13.5% 22.5% N/A N/A N/A Legend:Large Increase (greater than 25%) Moderate Increase (0% to 25%) Moderate Decrease (0% to ‐25%) Large Decrease (less than ‐25%) National Participatory Trends ‐ Aquatics Activity Participation Levels % Change NOTE: Participation figures are in 000's for the US population ages 6 and over National Trends in Aquatics Swimming is unquestionably a lifetime sport. Swimming activities have remained very popular among Americans, and both competition and fitness swimming have witnessed an increase in participation recently. Fitness swimming is the absolute leader in multigenerational appeal with over 26 million reported participants in 2013, a 13.5% increase from the previous year. NOTE: In 2011, recreational swimming was broken into competition and fitness categories in order to better identify key trends. Aquatic Exercise has a strong participation base, but has recently experienced a downward trend. Aquatic exercise has paved the way for a less stressful form of physical activity, allowing similar gains and benefits to land based exercise, including aerobic fitness, resistance training, flexibility, and better balance. Doctors have begun recommending aquatic exercise for injury rehabilitation, mature patients, and patients with bone or joint problems due to the significant reduction of stress placed on weight-bearing joints, bones, muscles, and also the affect that the pressure of the water assists in reducing swelling of injuries. hga commission number 3857-001-00 45 Community Center Feasibility Study 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 12‐13 11‐13 10‐13 09‐13 08‐13 Aerobics (High Impact) 11,780 12,771 14,567 15,755 16,178 17,323 7.1% 10.0% 18.9% 35.6% 47.1% Aerobics (Low Impact) 23,283 24,927 26,431 25,950 25,707 25,033 ‐2.6%‐3.5%‐5.3% 0.4% 7.5% Aerobics (Step) 9,423 10,551 11,034 10,273 9,577 8,961 ‐6.4%‐12.8%‐18.8%‐15.1%‐4.9% Boxing for Fitness N/A N/A 4,788 4,631 4,831 5,251 8.7% 13.4% 9.7% N/A N/A Calisthenics 8,888 9,127 9,097 8,787 9,356 9,356 0.0% 6.5% 2.8% 2.5% 5.3% Cross‐Training N/A N/A N/A 7,706 7,496 6,911 ‐7.8%‐10.3% N/A N/A N/A Cardio Kickboxing 4,905 5,500 6,287 6,488 6,725 6,311 ‐6.2%‐2.7% 0.4% 14.7% 28.7% Elliptical Motion Trainer 24,435 25,903 27,319 29,734 28,560 27,119 ‐5.0%‐8.8%‐0.7% 4.7% 11.0% Fitness Walking 110,204 110,882 112,082 112,715 114,029 117,351 2.9% 4.1% 4.7% 5.8% 6.5% Free Weights (Barbells) 25,821 26,595 27,194 27,056 26,688 25,641 ‐3.9%‐5.2%‐5.7%‐3.6%‐0.7% Free Weights (Dumbells) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 32,309 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Free Weights (Hand Weights) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43,164 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Martial Arts 6,818 6,643 6,002 5,037 5,075 5,314 4.7% 5.5%‐11.5%‐20.0%‐22.1% Pilates Training 9,039 8,770 8,404 8,507 8,519 8,069 ‐5.3%‐5.1%‐4.0%‐8.0%‐10.7% Running/Jogging 41,097 42,511 46,650 50,061 51,450 54,188 5.3% 8.2% 16.2% 27.5% 31.9% Stair Climbing Machine 13,863 13,653 13,269 13,409 12,979 12,642 ‐2.6%‐5.7%‐4.7%‐7.4%‐8.8% Stationary Cycling (Group) 6,504 6,762 7,854 8,738 8,477 8,309 ‐2.0%‐4.9% 5.8% 22.9% 27.8% Stationary Cycling (Recumbent) 11,104 11,299 11,459 11,933 11,649 11,159 ‐4.2%‐6.5%‐2.6%‐1.2% 0.5% Stationary Cycling (Upright) 24,918 24,916 24,578 24,409 24,338 24,088 ‐1.0%‐1.3%‐2.0%‐3.3%‐3.3% Stretching 36,235 36,299 35,720 34,687 35,873 36,202 0.9% 4.4% 1.3%‐0.3%‐0.1% Tai Chi 3,424 3,315 3,193 2,975 3,203 3,469 8.3% 16.6% 8.6% 4.6% 1.3% Treadmill 49,722 50,395 52,275 53,260 50,839 48,166 ‐5.3%‐9.6%‐7.9%‐4.4%‐3.1% Weight/Resistant Machines 38,844 39,075 39,185 39,548 38,999 36,267 ‐7.0%‐8.3%‐7.4%‐7.2%‐6.6% Yoga 17,758 18,934 20,998 22,107 23,253 24,310 4.5% 10.0% 15.8% 28.4% 36.9% National Participatory Trends ‐ General Fitness Activity Participation Levels % Change NOTE: Participation figures are in 000's for the US population ages 6 and over Legend:Large Increase (greater than 25%) Moderate Increase (0% to 25%) Moderate Decrease (0% to ‐25%) Large Decrease (less than ‐25%) National Trends in General Fitness National participatory trends in general fitness have experienced some strong growth in recent years. Many of these activities have become popular due to an increased interest among people to improve their health by engaging in an active lifestyle. These activities also have very few barriers to entry, which provides a variety of activities that are relatively inexpensive to participate in and can be performed by nearly anyone with no time restrictions. The most popular fitness activity by far is fitness walking, which had over 117 million participants in 2013, which was a 2.9% increase from the previous year. Other leading fitness activities based on number of participants include running/jogging (over 54 million), treadmill (48.1 million), and hand free weights (43.2 million), and weight/resistant machines (36.3 million). Over the last five years, the activities that are growing most rapidly are high impact aerobics (up 47.1%), yoga (up 36.9%), running/jogging (up 31.9%), cardio kickboxing (28.7% increase), and group stationary cycling (up 27.8%). Most recently, from 2012-2013, the largest gains in participation were in boxing for fitness (8.7% increase), Tai Chi (up 8.3%), and high impact aerobics (up 7.1%). 46 9 May 2016 City of Edina Aspirational Trends Analysis Ages 6-12 Ages 13-17 Ages 18-24 Ages 25-34 Swimming for Fitness Swimming for Fitness Swimming for Fitness Swimming for Fitness Bicycling Camping Bicycling Bicycling Camping Bicycling Hiking Camping Hiking Working Out with Weights Trail Running Hiking Running/Jogging Working Out using Machines Running/Jogging Working Out with Weights Ages 35-44 Ages 45-54 Ages 55-64 Ages 65+ Hiking Swimming for Fitness Swimming for Fitness Swimming for Fitness Working Out with Weights Working Out Using Machines Bicycling Working Out using Machines Swimming for Fitness Bicycling Working Out with Weights Hiking Camping Hiking Hiking Fitness Classes Bicycling Camping Working Out using Machines Working Out with Weights Aspirational Interest Though it is important to understand the trends of participants in all activities, it is equally important to understand the interest of nonparticipants. The following table presents the top activities for nonparticipants in various age segments. Among these aspirational interests, bicycling, running/jogging, working out with weights, and working out using machines may have facility implications for the Grandview Community Center. hga commission number 3857-001-00 47 Community Center Feasibility Study National Arts Programming Trends Data on participation in arts and cultural activities comes from a study entitled A Decade of Arts Engagement: Findings from the Survey of Public Participation in the Arts, 2002-2012. Nationally, individuals living in communities with mid- to lower-incomes participate in the arts at a rate of 48% as compared to higher income communities with individual participation in the arts ranking at 67%. Edina is most reflective of the latter high-income community. According to the study, many of the Edina Arts Center’s current programs rate highly in terms of participation nationally. National Arts Participation Levels (Adults, 2012) U.S. Minnesota Pottery, Ceramics, or Jewelry 4.5% 4.5% Leatherwork, Metalwork, or Woodwork 8.2% 10.4% Weaving, Crocheting, Quilting, Needlepoint, Knitting, or Sewing 13.2% 18.5% The tables below describe motivations and barriers to participation in the arts. Principal Motivations for Participation in Arts U.S. To socialize with friends and family 73% To learn new things 64% To experience high quality arts 63% To support the community 51% Principal Barriers to Participation in Arts U.S. Time 47% Cost 38% Access 37% No one to go with 22% 48 9 May 2016 City of Edina Local Trends And Market Potential A Market Potential Index (MPI) measures the probable demand for a product or service in the target area. The MPI communicates the likelihood that a resident of the service area will exhibit certain consumer behavior when compared to the national average. The national average is 100, therefore above 100 would represent a higher than average participation rate. The following chart illustrates the index of the greatest sport and leisure market potential within the 10, 15 and 20 minute drive times and the correlating programmatic and facility needs. The following chart show sport and leisure market potential data from ESRI. While no similar measures exist for local market potential for arts programming, the national and state information presented in the previous section, especially when taken in context of the community demographics of Edina, suggests that the market area is not only more inclined to be making life choices that support healthy living and wellness, but also has the potential for relatively high levels of participation in arts and cultural activities. Activity (Participation in last 12 months) MPI (10 min) MPI (15 min) MPI (20 min)Program Need Facility Need Aerobics 142 127 118 Fitness and Exercise Indoor Group Exercise Space Basketball 96 105 110 Youth and Adult Sports Indoor Gymnasium Pilates 168 135 122 Fitness and Exercise Indoor Group Exercise Space Swimming 138 120 111 Aquatics Aquatic Center Volleyball 92 105 110 Youth and Adult Sports Indoor Gymnasium Walking for Exercise 129 118 110 Fitness and Exercise Indoor Track Weight Lifting 147 131 123 Fitness and Exercise Fitness Center Yoga 180 153 141 Fitness and Exercise Indoor Group Exercise Space hga commission number 3857-001-00 49 Community Center Feasibility Study Community Survey Findings In the summer of 2014, ETC/Leisure Vision conducted a Comprehensive Community Needs Assessment Survey to help establish priorities for recreational programs and facilities within the City of Edina. The survey was designed to obtain statistically valid results from households throughout the city. The goal was to obtain a total of at least 600 completed surveys. ETC/Leisure Vision met that goal with a total of 1,222 surveys completed. The results of the random sample have a 95% level of confidence with a precision rate of at least +/-2.7%. Key findings relevant to the potential development of the Grandview Community Center are presented in this section. Community Need for Recreation Facilities 50 9 May 2016 City of Edina Unmet Need for Recreation Facilities hga commission number 3857-001-00 51 Community Center Feasibility Study Importance of Recreation Facilities 52 9 May 2016 City of Edina Spaces Residents Would Use hga commission number 3857-001-00 53 Community Center Feasibility Study Spaces Residents Would Use Most Often Summary Of the facilities being considered for the Grandview Community Center: Indoor fitness and exercise facilities rank highly in terms of overall community need, unmet need, importance, and spaces that residents would use. A senior center ranked moderately in terms of overall need and unmet need, and moderately high in terms of importance. This is to be expected for a facility that is targeted to a specific age segment and given the fact that the City of Edina has an existing senior center facility. Indoor basketball and volleyball courts (i.e., gymnasia) ranked moderately low on overall need and importance. 54 9 May 2016 City of Edina Competitors and Similar Providers Community Facilities in Edina There is an abundance of public and private facilities in and near Edina that fit into the broad category of civic, cultural, and social facilities and that serve some or all of the roles that may have been envisioned for the community facility space in the Grandview District. Edina and its neighbors are mature, fully-developed communities with active governments and a generally high degree of affluence. Consequently, there are many public or private buildings, rooms, parks and other facilities. This section describes facilities in Edina while the next section addresses major facilities in the other cities. Edina Community Center Edina and its neighbors each have a facility called a “community center” with varying types and amounts of spaces for civic, cultural and social events. The continuing education function of each school district often makes heavy use of that building for classes aimed at adults or children, especially preschoolers. Sometimes fitness facilities are included, either because the community center was a former school with those facilities, as in the case with Edina, or because it is a new building with that purpose in mind. The Edina Community Center, owned by Edina Public Schools and located in the former Edina East High School building at 5701 Normandale Boulevard, is a large building with many functions and activities. Its two major tenants are Edina Community Education and the French Immersion Option of Normandale Elementary School. In addition to the elementary school, the building includes: Five classrooms for adult education Three professional development rooms with computers and audio-visual equipment Two school gymnasiums One City-owned gymnasium Normandale Auditorium A demonstration kitchen (for use by Community Education only) A computer training room A library Five dance studios (one for tap dance) A woodworking shop Office spaces rented to 11 non-profit and other private organizations (on the third floor) Offices that support Edina Public Schools and Edina Community Education. The dance studios are mostly booked by Community Education and are not used much by other organizations. The professional development rooms receive much private use. Reservations are made no more than four months ahead for any of these facilities. The third floor is nearly fully occupied, with space for maybe one more private office rental. This building was originally constructed in 1948 and expanded or renovated several times. There is discussion underway about the future of the building and the degree to which it meets the needs of Edina Community Education. hga commission number 3857-001-00 55 Community Center Feasibility Study Other Edina School District Facilities The Edina School District, like those in neighboring cities, has several auditoriums, gymnasiums, meeting rooms and similar facilities available for occasional public use as they each are devoted principally and predominately to use by the schools. Use by other City organizations or, especially, other groups, receives a lower priority. These facilities are described under the following sections on auditoriums, swimming pools, and meeting and class rooms. Gymnasiums There are gymnasiums in the high and middle schools and the Community Center that may be rented by outside groups, but, like the stages, open times available to the general public are few after the school groups and City sports associations book their needs. Each of these facilities is heavily booked from November through May, less so the balance of the year. During the school day until 6:00 (and some days until 10:00pm), the gyms are devoted to the schools. In the evening, next priority goes to the City sports associations, which are under the auspices of the Parks Department. The limited remaining time may be used by other recreational groups, which are sometimes commercial or non-profit organizations. Weekends have the greatest number of openings. Rental rates vary by type of organization. There are two gyms owned by the City (as opposed to the School District), one in the Community Center and the other in South View Middle School. These are also near their full capacity of use by City sports associations. It is hoped that the multi-purpose sports dome to be built near Braemar Aquatic Arena beginning in 2014 will relieve some of this pressure by providing indoor practice space for certain sports such as lacrosse and soccer. 56 9 May 2016 City of Edina Rental Facilities While Edina has two rental facilities that can accommodate more than 300 individuals, they are both privately operated. The largest public-sector rental facility is the Braemar Golf Course with 250 person capacity. This data suggest that a large public event venue at a Community Center would not duplicate an existing facility within Edina. See the table below for capacity and fee information for the inventory available in the city. Venue Capacity Resident/Member Fees Non‐Resident/Non‐ Member Fees Batting Cages of MN 180 $100/hour N/A Braemar Golf Course 250 $350‐$500/Weekday $350‐$1200/Weekend N/A Centennial Lakes Park/Highes Pavillion 120 $150‐$1150 N/A Edina City Hall 22 Free N/A Edina Community Center Free N/A Edina Community Library 1‐222 Free N/A Edina Senior Center 80 Free N/A Mozza Mia 70‐100 Free N/A "The Mezz" at Byerly's Free N/A Pinstripes 20‐600 Varies N/A Pittsburgh Blue (Galleria) 7‐54 $1500‐4000 plus meal N/A Residence Inn Minneapolis 45 Varies N/A The Reserve 10 $45/hour $90/hour Southdale Library 3‐195 Free N/A The Terrace Room at Arneson Acres Park 75 $250/half day $350/Full Day $300/half day $400/Full Day Think Mutual Bank 30 Free N/A Westin Edina Galleria 300‐400 Varies N/A Rental Facilities hga commission number 3857-001-00 57 Community Center Feasibility Study Community Facilities in Neighboring Cities Neighboring cities were surveyed to identify their major community facilities that Edina residents or organizations might possibly use. The list of facility types studied was very similar to that used for Edina although the level of detail was less. The cities studied were: Edina St. Louis Park Hopkins Minnetonka Eden Prairie Bloomington Richfield Minneapolis (Southwest) The facility types studied were: Community centers School district facilities Gymnasiums, swimming pools and major fitness centers Community Centers Each neighboring suburban city has a facility known as a community, activity or recreation center. These exist in a wide variety of functions, buildings, locations and ownership arrangements. In most instances, the community centers of neighboring cities emphasize fitness, while in Edina the community center is a combination of learning and recreation. In contrast, the St. Louis Park Community Center is more strongly oriented toward learning and wellness; recreation, fitness and meetings are conducted in the St. Louis Park Recreation Center and in the schools. Eden Prairie and Minnetonka have relatively new buildings that were designed as public fitness centers with membership fees, quite a bit like private fitness clubs; the building in Eden Prairie also includes meeting rooms. In St. Louis Park, Richfield, Bloomington and Hopkins, the fitness and meeting facilities are spread through the city in school buildings and/or facilities built jointly by the City and the School District adjacent to school buildings. The community education division of the school districts usually programs their activities into these school facilities but they are also available for rent to the public when not booked by an organization that has higher priority (school activities then City-sponsored sports associations). The Edina model is closer to the latter with the exception that Edina also has a swimming pool in Edinborough Park. In Eden Prairie, Minnetonka and Richfield, the building is owned by the City while in St. Louis Park the School District is the owner. In Hopkins and Bloomington, the City and the School District jointly own their community centers, as their buildings are immediately adjacent to their high schools. Bloomington has two “activity centers” designed for fitness and recreation that are on high school campuses but programmed by a joint Bloomington and Richfield Community Services, which is housed in Bloomington Public School District. 58 9 May 2016 City of Edina In those community centers that are owned in whole or in part by the School District, the community education wing of the school district schedules many classes and activities into the building but also uses other school buildings. In all instances, the facility may be used by residents of other cities although rental or membership rates are higher for non-residents and priority for group rental may be lower. The Eden Prairie Community Center appears to be the most elaborate of the fitness centers while the Lindbergh Center in Hopkins and the Williston Fitness Center in Minnetonka are also quite well appointed and new. It should be noted that a number of neighboring cities are currently in the process of evaluating the feasibility of new community centers or have plans to expand existing centers. The communities of St. Louis Park and Bloomington have both recently completed feasibility studies. Also the Shakopee Community Center expansion was approved in 2015, as well as plans to replace Golden Valley’s Brookview Community Center. A summary comparison of existing facilities in neighboring cities is presented below. Comparison of Community Centers Name Facility Orientation Owner Location Design Edina Edina Community Center Learning and recreation School District School campus Former school St. Louis Park St. Louis Park Community Center Learning and wellness School District School campus Former school Hopkins Lindbergh Center Recreation and fitness Joint School and City School campus Custom Minnetonka Williston Fitness Center Recreation and fitness City City campus Custom Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Community Center Recreation, fitness, classes, meetings City School campus Custom Richfield Richfield Community Center Meetings City Park Custom Bloomington Activity Centers Recreation and fitness Joint School and City School campuses Custom School District Facilities In every neighboring community, the classrooms, computer training rooms, gymnasiums, auditoriums, swimming pools, tennis courts, field houses and cafeterias of the public schools are available for rent by the public after school hours and when not reserved by the schools or the City (for its sports organizations). Residents of other cities or for-profit organizations may rent the facilities but they may pay higher rates. Normandale Community College, located at 9700 France Avenue in Bloomington, has classrooms, conference rooms, a banquet room (up to 250 capacity), a theatre and an auditorium available for rent to the public. hga commission number 3857-001-00 59 Community Center Feasibility Study Gymnasiums and Major Fitness Centers As noted above, major fitness and recreation facilities are available in each of the neighboring cities either through the school district, the municipality or private businesses. Those owned by the City may be in buildings independent from a school campus or integrated into a high school or a community center building that is owned by the school district (as in Edina). Once again, facilities in the schools are meant primarily for school use and are not available during the school day or immediately after school. Evening use is sometimes dominated by City- sponsored sports organizations but some time is available for other groups. The Eden Prairie and Minnetonka fitness center include meeting rooms for rent. A summary comparison of these facilities is presented below. Comparison of Fitness Centers and Clubs Name Owner Location Edina School gymnasiums and pools LA Fitness Southdale YMCA School District City Business Community Center Schools Park Independent St. Louis Park School gymnasiums and pools LA Fitness; Lifetime Fitness Jewish Community Center School District City Business Schools Park Independent Hopkins Lindbergh Center School gymnasiums and pools LA Fitness School District Business Schools Minnetonka Williston Fitness Center School gymnasiums and pools City School District City campus Schools Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Community Center School gymnasiums and pools Lifetime Fitness City School District Business School campuses Richfield School gymnasiums and pools LA Fitness School District Business Schools Bloomington Activity Centers Lifetime Fitness School District Business High schools (2) 60 9 May 2016 City of Edina Private Fitness Facilities in Edina Private fitness and exercise facilities in Edina were inventoried and evaluated to establish an understanding of the extent of services currently available in the marketplace for Edina residents. The table below provides an overview of the 11 facilities identified, their hours, and membership options. The table on the following page summarizes available amenities among these providers. A significant number of these facilities serve niche segments of the population. Many are focused on specific activities (e.g., boxing, yoga), while several others target specific age groups (e.g., Welcyon – Fitness After 50), or appeal to users beyond the introductory level. Thus, despite the number and diversity of private fitness and exercise providers in the community, there still appears to be an unmet need for broad-based facilities that offer wide age-segment appeal and cater to all experience levels. HOURS OF OPERATION Number of Hours Open per Week Adult Individual (unlimited access) Dual (unlimited access) Family (unlimited access) Per Session 8 visits per month 8 visits per month (Dual) Anytime Fitness 168 $39 per month $60 per month NA NA NA NA Core Power Yoga 95 $155 per month NA NA $23 NA NA Crossfit 62 $130 per month NA NA $15 NA NA LA Fitness 136 $30 per month NA NA NA NA NA Orange Theory 93.5 $159 per month $320 per month NA $22 $110 per month $210 per month Power Source Personal Training By Appointment NA NA NA $70 NA NA Snap Fitness 168 $85 per month $50 per month $60 per month NA NA NA Southdale YMCA 115 $66 per month $99 per month $122 per month NA NA NA Steele Fitness 140 $79 per month NA NA NA NA NA Title Boxing 80 $79 per month $150 per month NA NA NA NA Welcyon 75 $69 per month NA NA NA NA NA MEMBERSHIP TYPE AND PRICING FACILITY hga commission number 3857-001-00 61 Community Center Feasibility Study AM E N I T I E S An y t i m e Fi t n e s s Co r e Po w e r Yo g a Cr o s s f i t L A F i t n e s s Or a n g e Th e o r y Po w e r So u r c e Pe r s o n a l Tr a i n i n g Sn a p Fi t n e s s So u t h d a l e YM C A St e e l e Fi t n e s s Ti t l e Bo x i n g We l c y o n Se l f D i r e c t e d F i t n e s s Gr o u p E x e r c i s e P r o g r a m s Gr o u p E x e r c i s e P r o g r a m s i n c l . i n m e m b e r s h i p Fi t n e s s s t u d i o s f o r g r o u p e x e r c i s e c l a s s e s Ca r d i o e q u i p m e n t Re s i s t a n c e t r a i n i n g m a c h i n e s Fr e e w e i g h t s Bo x i n g S t u d i o Ra c q ue t b a l l c o u r t s In d o o r l a p p oo l Wa r m w a t e r l e i s u r e p o o l Wh i r l p o o l Ze r o - d e p t h e n t r y p o o l Vo r t e x P o o l Ba s k e t b a l l c o u r t Ki d s g y m Fa m i l y l o c k e r r o o m Yo u t h l o c k e r r o o m s Ad u l t l o c k e r r o o m s Sa u n a ( i n l o c k e r r o o m s ) St e a m r o o m s ( i n l o c k e r r o o m s ) Pe r s o n a l t r a i n i n g Fi t n e s s A s s e s s m e n t s Ta n n i n g B e d s Dr o p - i n C h i l d C a r e Cl i m b i n g w a l l 62 9 May 2016 City of Edina Arts Facilities in the Region Over the past three decades, art centers have proliferated in first, second, and third ring suburban cities surrounding major metropolitan areas across the country. As part of a broader effort to more clearly establish unique identities and more directly provide cultural amenities, cities like Edina have built arts facilities and launched arts initiatives intended to make them increasingly competitive and attractive to businesses and residents of all ages. Several Twin Cities suburban cities have a dedicated “Arts Center” in addition to local community centers. These Art Centers provide locally-focused arts and culture programming to residents of all ages. The EAC directly compares with the wide-range of small and large Metro arts facilities listed in the chart below. The majority of these centers are 501c3 arts organizations benefitting from philanthropic contributions from their local community as well as State, Regional and Local government support. TWIN CITIES METRO AREA ARTS FACILITIES City Facility Name Disciplines Edina Edina Arts Center Pottery, jewelry, visual arts Apple Valley Ecumen Seasons at Apple Valley Multidisciplinary Bloomington Artistry Minnesota Masonic Home Visual arts Visual arts Brooklyn Center Ecumen Prairie Lodge Dance Eagan Caponi Art Park and Learning Center Eagan Parks and Recreation, Eagan Art House Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Center for the Arts Visual Arts, multidisciplinary Hopkins Hopkins Center for the Arts Music, visual arts Lakeville Lakeville Area Arts Center Visual Arts, multidisciplinary Maple Grove Maple Grove Arts Center Visual Arts, multidisciplinary Maplewood Ecumen Lakeview Commons Ecumen Seasons at Maplewood Crafts, fiber Music Minneapolis American Swedish Institute ArtiCulture Artspace Chicago Avenue Fire Arts Center Community Celebration of Place East Side Neighborhood Services Fired Up Studios Foci Minnesota Center for Glass Arts Free Arts Minnesota Highpoint Center for Printmaking Intermedia Arts Juxtaposition Arts Kulture Klub Collaborative Leonardo's Basement Minneapolis Park and Recreation Minnesota Center for Book Arts Northeast Minneapolis Arts Association Northern Clay Center NorthPoint Health and Wellness Center Pathways Phyllis Wheatley Community Center Simply Jane & Art Able St. Louis Park Friends of the Arts Multidisciplinary Visual arts Multidisciplinary Metal, glass, jewelry Multidisciplinary Dance Pottery Glass Multidisciplinary Visual arts, graphics Multidisciplinary Visual arts Multidisciplinary Design arts Music Visual arts, graphics Visual arts Crafts, clay Photography Visual arts, painting Multidisciplinary Drawing, Painting Drawing, painting hga commission number 3857-001-00 63 Community Center Feasibility Study Textile Center The Atelier The Film Society of Minneapolis/Saint Paul The Loft Literary Center The Minneapolis Institute of Arts Urban Arts Academy Urban Strategies, Inc. VSA Minnesota Weavers Guild of Minnesota Crafts, fiber Drawing, painting Media Arts, film Literature Visual arts Multidisciplinary Crafts, metal Multidisciplinary Crafts, fiber St. Paul Amherst H. Wilder Foundation ArtStart East Side Arts Council IFP Minnesota Minnesota Association for Children's Mental Health Mizna Neighborhood House Paquet Studios People Incorporated Saint Paul Neighborhood Network Twin Cities Housing Development Corporation Multidisciplinary Visual arts Multidisciplinary Media Arts Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary Painting Multidisciplinary Media Arts, film Folk/Traditional crafts/visual arts St. Anthony Silverwood Park-Three Rivers Park District Multidisciplinary St. Louis Park Arts-Stop Drawing, painting Wayzata Minnetonka Center for the Arts Visual arts White Bear Lake Phoenix Alternatives, Inc. White Bear Center for the Arts Visual arts Visual arts Woodbury Merrill Community Arts Center Multidisciplinary 64 9 May 2016 City of Edina Map of Metro Arts Facilities Mapping the Twin Cities Metro Area Arts Facilities offering one or more arts programs like the EAC shows an outlay of organizations with highest concentration in the Minneapolis Metro and St. Paul Metro areas and some scattering of offerings into the major suburbs. The major competitive zone is in Minneapolis with many facilities offering overlapping programming in a very small area. hga commission number 3857-001-00 65 Community Center Feasibility Study Arts Facility Benchmark Analysis This section provides an overview of the Edina Art Center, including its features, mission, programming mix, and financials. Nine similar facilities from the region and across the nation are also analyzed using the same points of comparison. Edina Art Center Size: Approx.10,000 sq. ft. Location: Edina, MN Organizational Structure: City-owned & operated Mission: The Edina Art Center mission is to provide facilities, programs and services that meet and reflect the needs of our residents and neighbors for participation, education, and enjoyment in the arts with emphasis on fine arts. Programming Mix: Classes for adults and children, year round. Summer day-camps for children. Classes in a variety of fine arts disciplines: drawing, painting, ceramics/pottery, jewelry. Also offer media classes and facilities. Community Demographics Population: 48,000 Median Age: 45.2 Predominant racial group: 88% white Median Household Income: $79,500; Per Capita Income: $56,800 Education: 97.4% of people over 25 have at least a HS degree or higher; 62.9% have a Bachelor’s degree or higher 30% of households have children under 18 Budget (2013, 2014, 2015) was a range each year between $607,650 and $661,111 Budget (2015) $661,111 Earned Income $355,090 Membership $21,467 Pottery Fees (includes Firing Fees) $82,605 Gallery & Retail Sales $46,175 Concession Sales $113 Expenses (2015) $661,1111 Administrative and general costs $450,212 Operations and Maintenance Costs $184,649 Number of Paid Employees: 14 (not including interns). 2 FTE, 12 PTE 66 9 May 2016 City of Edina General Findings about the Edina Arts Center Over the past three decades, art centers have proliferated in first, second and third ring suburban cities surrounding major metropolitan areas across the country. As part of a broader effort to more clearly establish unique identities and more directly provide cultural amenities, cities like Edina have built arts facilities and launched arts initiatives intended to make them increasingly competitive and attractive to businesses and residents of all ages. Several Twin Cities suburban cities have a dedicated “Arts Center” in addition to local community centers. These Art Centers provide locally-focused arts and culture programming to residents of all ages. The Edina Arts Center (EAC) opened its doors in the fall of 1977 in a former residence that was transformed into studios and workshop areas. Its facility is located just south of the Crosstown Highway near the south western edge of Edina. EAC operates as a semi-autonomous department of the Edina Parks and Recreation Department with maintenance provided by the City and ongoing operating support provided through the Enterprise Fund. Edina Parks & Recreation provides both oversight and an important connection to the City’s Administration and its budgeting process. EAC’s current facility has approximately 10,150 square feet situated on three levels. Circulation in the facility is awkward and programmatic growth opportunities are highly limited. Now nearly thirty years old, the facility is no longer competitive with other arts centers in the area and has substantial ADA issues as well as significant deferred maintenance. Based on current class participation data approximately 65% of participants are Edina residents with approximately 35% come from the surrounding area. Location Challenges As with any business operation, location and local competition are key factors. Although the EAC has a devoted following and has retained general participation levels it has not seen much growth in the last two decades. Further, although EAC is easily accessed off France Avenue and the Crosstown Highway, it is not central to Edina’s population and it’s somewhat “out of the way” location negatively impacts participation in EAC programs by Edina residents. While EAC remains highly active and its program revenues are holding relatively well, growth in participation, sales and fundraising are increasingly unlikely at the current location. Current Program Offerings EAC is focused primarily on visual arts and ceramics education programs including the following media; Pottery & Ceramics, Clay Sculpture Painting & Drawing Water media Mosaics Digital Media & Photography Literary Arts Jewelry Crafting Specialty/Holiday-themed Activities; Henna Tattoo Art, Pumpkin Decorating for Halloween, Christmas/Hanukkah/Solstice craft workshops The most popular programs at EAC of Pottery, Ceramics and Jewelry rate the same in terms of participation statewide and nationally according to Americans for the Arts ADP5 data on leisure hga commission number 3857-001-00 67 Community Center Feasibility Study participation. Arts program areas the EAC cannot fill due mostly to space constraints such as Leatherwork, Metalwork, Woodwork, and other textiles rate at levels of participation in Minnesota that are significantly higher than the national averages. Program expansion in these areas, one could safely say would bring as high or higher high levels of participation as compared to the ceramics programs. Class levels range offerings for the true beginner to those appropriate for advanced students. The pottery, painting, drawing, and water media programs are particularly diverse, and include many specialized classes. For example, the painting offerings range from figure painting to abstract landscapes; the drawing offerings include pastel chalk classes, drawing portraits from photographs, and botanical drawing. EAC also offers open studio time for adults interested in working individually on their water media, drawing and painting, or jewelry projects. Class offerings for children are generally taught at an introductory level and geared towards elementary and middle school aged students, as adult classes are open to ages 15 and up. Many of the class offerings for children are interdisciplinary survey classes intended to introduce students to a variety of art media. Classes for the youngest age groups are more thematically driven (ex. Backyard Art, the Animal World, Clay for Kids), and use mixed media crafting to engage these young students. EAC also hosts an after-school Art Academy, separated by age groups, for students looking to explore their artistic interests and talents. Of these offerings, Pottery and Clay Sculpture is by far and away the biggest draw at EAC, consistently bringing in the greatest amount of earned income and attracting the greatest number of young people to EAC programs. Along with excellent instructional leadership, innovative class offerings and continuing investment in the ceramics area and both indoor and outdoor kilns, EAC hosts one of the most highly respected pottery/ceramics programs in the state. The Pottery program is in high enough demand to support two times the number of classes presently offered. Space demands, however, hinder the possibility of expanding this program to meet demand. While Painting & Drawing classes remain a mainstay at EAC and are taught by highly respected instructors, there has been less dynamic change in this area. EAC cannot accommodate many of the classes requested or flex to meet market demand due to space constraints. Figure drawing classes which are regularly requested and offered at the majority of similar arts centers locally, do not fit in the current space. It is fair to say that deferred improvements to the painting and drawing studios including improved ventilation, lack of adequate student lockers, and the growing presence of the digital world in image-making presents an increasing challenge to these types of programs. Nonetheless, these programs are vital to the life of EAC and, as with many other programmatic offerings, interest will wax and wane but the basic programs should remain rooted in disciplines related to a fine arts education. Potential Areas of Growth EAC programming trends have been tracked from 2011 to the present and reveal a consistent pattern of registration that varies by season. Registrations are high in the Fall and lower in the Winter, rising slightly in the spring and steady through the summer. There is a definite spike in children’s registration during the summer that one might expect during non-school months and is typical of the “Art Center” and Community Ed children’s programming. Reviewing class registrations, interviewing staff about most frequently requested classes and main competitors, 68 9 May 2016 City of Edina revealed a demand for more classes that could potentially be met by a larger, up-to-date facility specifically designed to house such programming. A new centralized facility could accommodate growth in programs in the following areas Greater overall participation by Edina residents in current programs due to better location and higher visibility Senior and special needs participants Children and Youth oriented program offerings Added programming in highly requested areas including glass, metal work, sculpture Evening classes in all programming areas Comparable Art Centers Nine regional and national centers are identified below along with information about their facility, program, legal structure and operation. Each has comparative relevance to Edina and judged to be reasonably successful in their communities based upon program participation and range of community support. In particular, the Minnetonka Art Center and Artistry in Bloomington are viewed as highly successful because of the quality of their facilities, the reach of their programs and the range of funding that they receive to support their programs and operations. Minnetonka Center for the Arts Size: 31,000 sq. ft. Location: Wayzata, MN Organizational Structure: Private 501(c)(3) Mission: the belief that the visual arts are indispensable to a healthy community, it is the mission of the Minnetonka Center for the Arts to provide teaching excellence, quality exhibitions and cultural enrichment for people of all ages, interests and abilities. Programming Mix: Year-round programming for young children, teens, and adults. Teens are distinguished as a special group with certain classes targeted at their interests. Summer day-camps for kids and teens. Partnerships with Walker Art Center and Ridgedale Mall. Community Demographics (Wayzata & Minnetonka) Populations: 50,000 (M) & 3,700 (W) Median Age: 45 (M) & 48 (W) M: 90% white, W: 92.5% white hga commission number 3857-001-00 69 Community Center Feasibility Study M: 25% of households have children under 18, 52% are married: 14% of households have children under 18, 42% are married Median household income: $81,000 (M) and $64,000 (W) Per capita income: $47,200 (M) and $56,700 (W)Education: M = 98% HS degree or higher; W = 99% HS degree or higher Budget (2015) $750,511 65% Tuition Revenue Nearly 35% Contributed, Grants, membership, fundraising events Number of Paid Employees: 40 (11 full-time, including 7 admins, 2 registrars, 2 studio managers) Annual Participation Serves more than 10,000 people each year through arts center programs Undefined gallery visits Curates and manages’ Ridgedale Center regional artists display which millions of visitors who pass through the shopping center each year 70 9 May 2016 City of Edina Artistry (Formerly Bloomington Art Center) Location: Bloomington, MN. Organizational Structure: City-owned, public/private operating partnership Mission Statement: We exist to enrich the cultural fabric of the communities we serve by providing high quality performing arts, visual arts, and arts education programs, and by welcoming and nurturing talent. Programming Mix: Big focus on presenting work and encouraging audience appreciation. Partnership with Bloomington Civic Theatre. Adult and youth workshop courses in a variety of fine arts disciplines (clay, painting, drawing, glass, fiber, photography, etc.). Very focused class topics, like Shade and Light Drawing. Offering theatre/drama classes for kids in collaboration with BCT. Outreach activities for kids (working with charter schools, Boy/Girl Scouts, etc.). Community Demographics Population: ~83,000 Median age: 43 80% white Median Household Income: $57,800; Per Capita Income: $34,000 Educated: about ⅔ have at least some college, if not a bachelor’s degree or beyond Household types: most people are either single (32%), or married w/o children (36%) and (23%) of households have children under 18. Budget (2015) approximately $1.9million 62% Ticket sales, class fees, art sales ($1,179,608) 44% In-Kind Contributions and Grants (836,598) 4% Undefined Number of Paid Employees: 21 (8 full-time) Annual Participation (2014-2015) 39,869 5,599 Children and adults served through arts education partnerships 534 On site registrations for youth art programs 1,186 On site registrations for adult art programs 26,885 Tickets issued to Schneider Theatre performances 5,665 Tickets issued to Black Box Theatre Performances hga commission number 3857-001-00 71 Community Center Feasibility Study The Phipps Center for the Arts Size: 64,000 sq. ft. Location: Hudson, WI Organizational Structure: Private 501(c)(3) ownership & operation Mission: Two identifiable areas of focus: presentation of art (in galleries, exhibits, curations, etc.) and art education (year-round class offerings for both children and adults). Programming Mix: Classes offered for both children and adults, but summer programming is almost exclusively for children. The selection for kids’ summer camps is outstanding - over 50 to choose from, ranging from one day-long class to ones that last for a week. Separate classes for both children and teens. Partnerships with local hospitals and Spirit of St. Croix Days - art display/sale opportunities. Gallery shows for members and non-members. Bench Project - permanent installations of usable art project benches made by community members/groups. Community Demographics Population: 12,700 (Hudson and surrounding area: 34,000) Median Age: 33 98% white Median Income: $51,000. Per capita income: $27,000 31% of all households have children under 18, 29% of all households are single people 75% have at least some college, if not a bachelor’s degree or beyond Budget (2013, 2014, 2015) was a range each year between $1.1 million and $1.2 million Projected Budget (2016) $1,230,874 30% Performance Income ($368,054) 22% Class Income ($271,250) 14% Rental, Concessions, Gallery Sales, Interests Income and Investments ($166,070) 34% Other including: Contributions and Grants, etc. Expenses Projected (2016) $1,230,874.00 Administrative and general costs $365,443 Operations and Maintenance Costs $234,835 Producing, Presenting, Exhibiting Costs $462,145 Class Costs $168,451 72 9 May 2016 City of Edina Number of Paid Employees: 12 Annual Participation (July 2014 through June 2015) 23,545 people came to 147 performances, recitals, and events ranging from dramatic to musical theater productions and from jazz to classical concerts. Thousands were attracted to the 26th annual free outdoor concert by the Minnesota Orchestra and the Spirit of the St. Croix Art Festival 368 students took individual music lessons Over 2,900 valley residents were attracted to 54 community rental activities Nearly 1,650 attended 11 art receptions 84 visual arts class offerings totaled 773 students 248 performing arts classes attracted 2,672 participants hga commission number 3857-001-00 73 Community Center Feasibility Study Maple Grove Arts Center Size: 2,000 sq. ft. Location: Suburban Maple Grove, MN Organizational Structure: 501(c)(3) Mission Statement: To provide fine art, musical and theatrical exploration and appreciation opportunities. Programming Mix: Fewer class options than most other organizations. Classes for kids and adults, but mostly for kids and teens. Variety of classes offered in both visual arts and performing arts disciplines. Also offer free open studio dates for the community. Community Demographics Population: 61,600 Median Age: 38 86% white 40% of households have children under 18; 19% of all households are single people Median Household Income: $93,000; Per Capita Income: $40, 900 Education: 97% have HS degree or higher; 49% have Bachelor’s degree or higher Budget (2014) $150,000 52% In-Kind Donation ($78,000 from a single source which covers rent and utilities) 17% Fundraising Gala ($25,000) 31% Remainder from sponsorships, programming and program fees Number of Paid Employees: 0 FTE's (Volunteer Executive Director at 40 hours per week) and 15-20 PT art teachers Annual Participation (2015) Approximately 5,000 including those served by arts education, attending gallery shows and annual gala 74 9 May 2016 City of Edina White Bear Center for the Arts Size: 10,000 sq. ft. (new facility in 2013) Location: White Bear Lake, MN Organizational Structure: 501(c)(3) Mission Statement: The mission of White Bear Center for the Arts is to provide a gateway to diverse arts experiences. We will: Educate new and established artists; Cultivate the understanding of art in its many forms; Celebrate the joys of arts. We value: Creative process; Openness; Transformative experience. Programming Mix: Classes for Adults, Teens, and Kids. Very thorough mixture of class offerings. Even offer a “create your own class” offering - kind of like a private lesson: if you want to learn something but can’t make the scheduled class time or the offered classes don’t address your topic adequately, you can find an instructor and get studio time with them (they require you to get at least 4 people to do the class). Examples of create your own classes - sewing, mosaics, printmaking, art history, etc. Offer a lot of community conversations with artists, easy art contests (ex. sand castle contest in the summer), and a community “Iron Pour” event. Partnership with Stepping Stone Theatre to offer kids’ drama courses. The center boasts 430 current members, 30% are White Bear residents. Community Demographics Population: 23,800 Median Age: 41 90% white 27% of households have children under 18; 34% of households are single people Median Household Income: $57,000; Per Capita Income: $31,000 Education: 94% have HS degree or higher, 31% have Bachelor’s degree or higher Budget (2014) $672,452 47% Contributions and Grants: $316,500 49% Program Fees ($329,400; Arts Education: 51%, Contributions: 31%, Community Programs: 7%, Membership Revenue: 6%, Grants: 5%) 4% Other Number of Paid Employees: 6 FTE’s Annual Participation (2014) 33,000 people attended arts education, gallery shows, education partnerships, rental events. With a regional presence, WBCA draws participants from more than 100 zip codes, with the majority of participants from Ramsey and Washington counties. From July 2013 through June 2014, the first year in the new facility, WBCA offered 774 classes. This was an increase of 27% compared to the previous 12 months. During the same time period, class registrations hga commission number 3857-001-00 75 Community Center Feasibility Study increased 44%. WBCA will offer 205 classes in fall 2014, more than any other quarter in the organization’s history. 76 9 May 2016 City of Edina Hopkins Center for the Arts Location: Downtown Hopkins, MN Size: 36,000 sq. ft. Organizational Structure: City-owned, city-operated, 501c3 tenants Mission: The Arts Center builds community through the arts by fostering creative expression and providing artistic and educational opportunities for people of all ages. Programming: Theatre Performances, concerts, films, exhibitions, lectures, literary arts, and classes in fine arts. Arts Center also houses Stages Theatre Company and space rentals from Hopkins Public Schools. Big focus on exhibitions and gallery showings. Classes are mostly for adults, and are focused on painting and take-home project-based classes (ex. Knit yourself a scarf, make a jewelry box). On the whole, the Hopkins Center for the Arts seems more about presenting the arts and creating exposure, rather than teaching the arts. Also offer space rentals. Community Demographics Population: 17,600 Median Age: 34 70% white, 13.5% African-American, 8.5% Asian 5% of households have children under 18; 43% of households are single people Median Household Income: $47,000; Per Capita Income: $29,400 Education: 93% have HS degree or higher, 39% have Bachelor’s degree or higher Budget (2013) $756,563 17% Facility Operations ($127,723) 48% Salaries and Benefits ($361,634) 35% Arts Programs ($267,206) Actual Revenue (2015) $776,191 48% Leases and Rentals ($369,822) 19% Programs ($151,510) 19% City Transfers ($147,920) 8% State Grants ($62,962) 6% Friends Contributions ($22,707) plus Facility Fees ($21,267) Funding sources The Friends of the Hopkins Center for the Arts raise money through memberships, sponsorships hga commission number 3857-001-00 77 Community Center Feasibility Study and fundraising event. $61,000 was transferred from the Economic Development Fund and $86,920 from the cable fund Grants are a source of revenue for the center though HCA has received reduced grant funding in recent years and put supplemental planning in place A plan is in place to decrease expenses and increase revenue in 2015 Historically, the Hopkins Center for the Arts has received a subsidy from the Economic Development Fund. The reason behind this was that the Center has an impact on the economic health of the City and the downtown area in particular by bringing in over 215,000 visitors each year. However, devoting these funds to the Center meant that there were fewer resources to devote to other development projects in the City. According to the City of Hopkins’ adopted Financial Management Plan, this subsidy will be replaced by supplemental funding through the General Fund in a manner similar to the Activity Center beginning in 2015. Number of Paid FTE's=4, PTE's=13, Volunteers=Undefined Annual Participation (2013-2014) 215,000 Visitors The Center presented 12 concerts serving 6,019 patrons 26 different organizations rented space at the Center for arts events; a total of just under 3,000 hours of programming Tenants of the Center provided over 17,300 hours of arts programming Rental Stats at Hopkins (2014) A key source of earned income for the Center is the rental of rooms to outside users Rentals increased in both 2013 and 2014, altogether a 40% increase over 2012 90 businesses held meetings or other events at the Center in 2013; 95 in 2014 40 individuals chose to have family gatherings at the Center in 2013; 50 in 2014 78 9 May 2016 City of Edina Evanston Art Center Size: 17,000 sq. ft. Location: Evanston, IL Organizational Structure: 501(c)(3) organization Mission: The Evanston Art Center is dedicated to fostering the appreciation and expression of the arts among diverse audiences. The Art Center offers extensive and innovative instruction in broad areas of artistic endeavor through classes, exhibitions, interactive arts activities, and community outreach initiatives Programming: They have a mix of youth, teen, adult, and family classes. Some of the adult classes are more unique - woodcutting techniques, fashion design, figure drawing, metalsmithing. Also offering youth summer camps. 10 week sessions for adult classes, 5 weeks for kids. Seasonal arts & crafts expos. Community Outreach programs for both youth and seniors (artists-in-residence programs at local schools, partnership with Loyola University, Summer Reading program with Public Libraries, sending Art Center employees into nursing homes to work with residents). Also exhibit some pieces in a gallery. Community Demographics Population: 74,500 Median Age: 34 66% white, 18% black, 9% Hispanic, 8.5% Asian 26% of households have children under 18; 38% of households are single people Median Household Income: $68,000; Per Capita Income: $43,000 Education: 93% have HS degree or higher, 66% have Bachelor’s degree or higher Budget (2015) $1,144,460 million 63% Earned Income 20% Contributions and Grants 8% Special Events 5% Memberships 4% Investment Income Annual Expense (2015) 74.5% Total Charitable Program Service Expenditure 13.5% Management and General Expense 12% Fundraising Expense FTE’s=4, PTE’s=6, Teaching artists=68, Interns=87, Board of Trustees=16 Annual Participation (2014) 3,000 students (ages 3 to 85 representing 80 zip codes) 223 Artists exhibiting in the galleries Gallery Attendees is undefined hga commission number 3857-001-00 79 Community Center Feasibility Study Kirkland Arts Center Size: 8,400 sq. ft. Location: Kirkland, Washington Organizational Structure: Independent 501c3 Mission: Kirkland Arts Center promotes artistic mastery and community participation in the visual arts through innovative educational programming, contemporary exhibitions, and dynamic events while providing stewardship of the historic Peter Kirk Building. Programming: The art center hosts 5 to 6 gallery shows per year of mostly local artists and one juried show of national and international submissions. Adult and Youth programming in the areas of painting, ceramics and pottery and print, jewelry, digital art, printmaking and art history. Creative programs and events for adults such as Art & Wine night are other revenue generators. The Kirkland Art Center also manages the Kirkland Artists Studio Tour as well as acts as a host studio for local ceramic artists on an ongoing basis. Community Demographics Population: 84,430 Median Age: 38.4 years 71.8% white, 1.3% Black, 14% Asian, 7.4% Hispanic 18.8% of households have children under 18; 33% of households are single people Median Household Income: $93,655; Per Capita Income: $50,991 Education: 96.2% have HS degree or higher, 58.4% have Bachelor’s degree or higher Annual Revenue (2013) $567,707* 13% Contributions ($73,789) 8% Government Grants ($46,750) 57% Program Services ($324,368) Investments $97 17% Special Events ($96,120) 4% Sales ($14,289) and Miscellaneous ($12,295) Annual Expenses (2013) $607,071 79% Program Services ($478,117) 17% Administration ($105,299) 4% Other ($23,655) 80 9 May 2016 City of Edina *Annual Revenue and Expenses above came from most recently published IRS 990 forms. The development director at the center reported in a phone conversation that due to space and program expansion and increased funding, the center now operates (2015-2016) on an annual budget of about $950,000. The center depends on earned income from studio art programs remains near 60%. Number of Paid Employees: 8 FTE’s, Volunteers and other PTE’s undefined Annual Participation (2014) 1200 students served per quarter through arts center programming; 40 Adult classes, 10 Youth Classes, 30 Adult Workshops and Intensives, 20 Youth Camps and Workshops. Summer quarter has additional youth classes Other visitors to the center for gallery, performance, etc. are not specifically defined. According to the Director, thousands attend Kirkland’s artist studio tour, gallery shows and craft events each year. hga commission number 3857-001-00 81 Community Center Feasibility Study MCCLEAN COUNTY ARTS CENTER Size: 5,000+ sq. ft. (Former Church combined with house) Location: Bloomington, Illinois (McClean County) Organizational Structure: Independent 501c3 Mission: We encourage and promote the appreciation, study, cultivation, development, and practice of the Arts in McLean County. MCAC is an independent 501c3 non-profit organization, we are the arts agency for McLean County. Programming: Currently the Arts Center presents approximately twelve exhibitions yearly, including the annual Holiday Treasures exhibition and the annual Amateur Competition and Exhibition which for over 80 years has showcased the best amateur artists from the region. MCAC also offers art classes, artist lectures, art workshops for youth and adults and associated performing and literary arts presentations. The community is also offered opportunities to purchase artwork through the Sales Gallery. MCAC facilitates two arts festivals annually, Spring Bloom Arts Festival in March at Illinois State University's Bone Student Center and Sugar Creek Arts Festival in July at Uptown Normal. Community Demographics Population: 78,902 Median Age: 33.8 years 73.5% white, 11.7% Black, 7.3% Asian, 5.0% Hispanic, 3.3% Other 23% of households have children under 18; 53.9% of households are single people Median Household Income: $$60,652; Per Capita Income: $33,640 Education: 95.1% have HS degree or higher, 45.1% have Bachelor’s degree or higher Annual Budget (2013) $314,590 – breakdown not available Actual Revenue (2013) $330,282 46% Contributions, Gifts, Grants and other similar amounts ($151,791) 31% Program Service Revenue ($101,501) 11% Investment income ($37,009) 5% Net Gain from Sales ($18,495) 7% Miscellaneous Revenue ($21,486) Annual Participation (2015) 82 9 May 2016 City of Edina More than 2,000 served through arts programs and the center (youth and adult) and offsite programs (youth) Tens of thousands attend the two major outdoor festivals coordinated by the center annually. hga commission number 3857-001-00 83 Community Center Feasibility Study Summary and Implications The primary market for the Community Center should be in the range of a 10-15 drive time from the site (serving the Edina population and adjoining communities). However, some features of the center can be designed to serve a broader secondary market, such as a 20-minute drive time, or the entire Twin Cities metropolitan area, especially if this broader market helps achieve financial and cost recovery goals. Each of the measured service areas is demographically similar. Growth is projected to be slightly below that of national rates over the next fifteen years. The makeup of the service areas population will change as it is expected to age, however, will remain relatively affluent with income levels above both state and national medians. National topline recreation trends show that fitness walking, running/jogging, and using a treadmill are the activities with the most participation. Other national sports, fitness, and recreation trends that may affect planning for the Grandview Community Center include: o Despite a decline, basketball also ranks highly in participation o Gymnastics is experiencing steady increase o Racquetball participation is decreasing o Traditional fitness center activities (aerobics, free weights, treadmill, stationary cycling) are among the highest ranking in participation o Martial arts and Pilates are exhibiting declines in participation. Although many residents of Edina participate in arts programming, the City itself has limited facilities and organizations within its geographic area other than the existing EAC. Edina residential demographics demonstrate a high degree of both affluence and education characteristic of arts consumers throughout the country. Local market potential metrics (i.e., MPIs) suggest that fitness/exercise programming would be successful at Grandview Community Center. This translates to facility needs for indoor group exercise/multi-use spaces, a fitness center, and an indoor track. There is a lack of demand for a sports programming and a gymnasium within the 10-minute drive time service area. Survey findings from 2014 showed that indoor fitness and exercise facilities rank highly in terms of overall community need, unmet need, importance, and spaces that residents would use. Senior centers ranked moderately, but as expected for a facility that is targeted to a specific age segment. Indoor courts and gymnasia ranked moderately low. While Edina has another community center, it is operated by Edina Public Schools and does not offer substantial use to non-district activities. Community centers of neighboring cities generally emphasize fitness, while Edina provides a combination of learning and recreation. In slight of similar providers, considerations for the Grandview Community Center include uses for meetings, wellness, and recreation. Despite the number and diversity of private fitness and exercise providers in the community, there still appears to be an unmet need for broad-based facilities that offer wide age-segment appeal and cater to all experience levels. 84 9 May 2016 City of Edina Crossover cultural/fitness/wellness programming at the Grandview facility could combine the best of these types of offerings in a facility designed to serve residents of all ages and attract participation from the surrounding area. Current programming of EAC could compliment wellness oriented activities like Pilates, Yoga, dance movement, etc. Fitness programs that offer a social component for seniors could mesh well with a general community wellness approach to programming a new center. hga commission number 3857-001-00 85 Community Center Feasibility Study 7. OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS The Edina Grandview Community Center (EGCC) financial plan is outlined in the pro forma and various schedules presented in this chapter of the report. The conceptual plan is based on the development of a 69,294 gross square foot facility with major components consisting of an art center, active adult (i.e., senior) center, community gathering spaces, café, and fitness/wellness areas. A list of pro forma assumptions was established in order to depict a dynamic operation in a static environment; these assumptions are presented on the following pages of this report. The validity of the pro forma and financial plan is based on these assumptions being met in their entirety. Although it is believed the information and assumptions constitute a reasonable basis for preparation of the projections, the achievements of any financial projection may be affected by fluctuating economic conditions and are dependent upon the occurrence of future events that cannot be assured. Therefore, actual results may vary from the projections and such variations could be material. These assumptions outline how the Grandview Community Center should be operated and maintained, as well as how the services should be priced. Following discussion with the project Task Force, Parks & Recreation Board, Arts & Culture Commission, City Council, and staff, the adopted program for the facility reflects transferring existing core programs such as arts and senior programming to the new center. It also allows for the creation and/or expansion of some core programs such as performing arts. The EGCC space program has some but limited space available for fitness and wellness activities, as well. To be successful and financially sustainable, the EGCC must operate using a flexible, entrepreneurial approach, allowing for program changes when necessary, real-time adjustment of operations to market conditions. Operations and Financial Plan Assumptions The initial development of the feasibility and business plan study focused on developing a clear set of assumptions. The end product focuses on determining operating costs and revenue streams of the EGCC; this included developing an operational budget and a pricing strategy to best meet the outcomes desired while accounting for market factors. Schedules summarizing the expenditures and revenues, along with the notes and assumptions set forth, are integral to the analysis and conclusions stated in the financial plan. These notes and assumptions should be carefully read and considered when reviewing the schedules. General Assumptions The assumptions in this study assist in understanding how the financial plan was developed and the strategies with which the EGCC will ultimately be operated. This allows for the revision of assumptions in the future while still maintaining the integrity of the plan by understanding the impact that the changes will have on the operational budget or market capture. The major assumptions for the site used for the development of the financial plan are as follows: Operations and financial plan is based on major components as depicted in concept plan, including: o An Art Center consisting of a gallery, studio, pottery/ceramics area, metal arts, glass/jewelry, gift shop, and storage; totaling 20,142 gross square feet. 86 9 May 2016 City of Edina o An Active Adult center consisting of commons, multipurpose classrooms, seminar room, game room, and storage; totaling 10,284 gross square feet. o Community Gathering spaces consisting of a lobby/reception area, commons, flexible meeting spaces, café, catering kitchen, and culinary arts instructional area; totaling 9,105 gross square feet. o An Event Venue including dressing suites, storage, and event support areas; totaling 10,627 gross square feet. o Fitness and Wellness studios to conduct programming; totaling 8,134 gross square feet. o Administrative and building support areas; totaling 11,003 gross square feet. The pro forma budget is based on 2016 dollar values. Salaries are based on 2016 salaries of equivalent job descriptions. Food service will be provided by a vendor/contractor. Grounds maintenance costs are not included in the pro forma as it is budgeted separately by the City. Capital Investment Assumptions Capital investment for the EGCC is based on the concept plan and components as detailed in program spaces identified to date. Capital costs for the EGCC is projected at $45,435,546 for the 69,294 gross square foot building, plus parking with parking for 380 spaces. Pricing Assumptions Pricing is outlined for each individual program within the electronic Excel model and summarized within this report document. Pricing is value-based, meaning that pricing was determined based on existing rates then adjusted as necessary for typical market rates given the assumed level of service received. Pricing comparisons to other related facilities were used for guidelines for developing the pricing schedule, however, the ultimate goal of value provided was utilized for developing the pro forma. General Expense and Revenue Assumptions Expenses are projected to be 100% of projected costs beginning in the modeled year Operating Year 1; annual increases of a set percent per year each year thereafter as based on Expenditure and Revenue Growth Inputs. Revenues are projected to be 100% of projected revenue capacity beginning in the modeled year Operating Year 1; annual increases of a set percent per year each year thereafter as based on Expenditure and Revenue Growth Inputs. Percentage of cost recovery is based on the assumed market participation and value/market based pricing. hga commission number 3857-001-00 87 Community Center Feasibility Study Operating and growth inputs are based on average increases per expenditure and revenue category; due to the volatility of the health care and energy sectors, higher growth rates were utilized for employee benefits and utilities. All projections are based on assumptions and estimates made within the electronic Excel model. Pro forma assumptions beginning in Operating Year 1 are based on management and staff performing extensive lead-in/pre-opening marketing, promotions, and programming tailored to the customer base. Pro forma program is based on an aggressive program offering (60% of total available space and/or 60% productivity of programs) that will require detailed scheduling to allow for successive usages on a regular basis. Center utilities are estimated based upon similar municipal facilities in the area. Staffing Assumptions Center staffing is a direct result of the requirement of the operating hours. Center staffing is based on “lean management” practices where all positions/human resources expended for any goal other than the creation of value for the customer base are nonessential. As the EGCC reaches operational and programmatic maturity, additional staff persons may be required. Staffing salary/wages based on current salaries and national industry averages. General benefits for full-time staff have been calculated based on input from the City of Edina. Inclusive benefits and other charges required for most employees regardless of employment status (including payroll taxes and fees) are factored at a percentage of total seasonal staff salary and full-time staff overtime, excluding any general benefits. Membership Assumptions Separate membership programs would be implemented for the Art Center and Active Adult Center, both assumed to reflect increases based upon increased program space and capacity. It is assumed that management will assess memberships and admissions and will implement promotions as needed; it is assumed that limited discounting will occur. It is assumed that management will assess memberships and admissions and discontinue practice and/or revise price points if demand far exceeds assumptions; this will ensure validity of financial projection. Programming Assumptions Programs assume that 60% of the classes will make the minimum number to hold the class. Programming and rentals are based on estimates for units per experience/session, total sessions offered, fee per program/activity, and/or extrapolations from existing program participation rates. 88 9 May 2016 City of Edina Programs shown are depicted as either contract instructor or staff administered; contract instructor-led programs could be shifted to staff personnel if management deems staff instructors as the most equitable for operations. Rentals for major components are assumed to be: o Multi-purpose classroom rentals – 100 occurrences of 2-hour rentals at $35 per hour o Event venue premium rentals – 52 occurrences of 3-hour rentals at 225 per hour o Caterer revenue – 15% caterer commission Operating/Growth Input Assumptions Operating and growth inputs are based on average increases per expenditure and revenue category; due to the volatility of the health care and energy sectors, higher growth rates were utilized. o Revenues are projected to growth annual by 3.0% through growth in users and fee adjustments o Salaries and Benefit growth rate is calculated at 4.0% annual growth due to the potential volatility of the insurance/pension fund requirements o Supplies growth rate is calculated at 3.0% annual growth due to inflation o Services growth rate is calculated at an average of 4.0% annual growth due to inflation and the potential volatility of the energy sector o Capital expenditure and revenue categories average a growth rate of 2.0% o Transfers vary with increases in revenues. hga commission number 3857-001-00 89 Community Center Feasibility Study Six (6) Year Pro Forma Based on all operating assumptions set forth within this report, and excluding any unforeseen circumstances, the EGCC is projected to achieve a cost recovery of 70% in its first year of operation. A summary of the six-year pro forma is presented below. Pro Forma Revenues & Expenditures EDINA GRANDVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER ‐ Option B 6 YEAR PRO FORMA Revenues 1th Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Administration $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Maintenance $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Custodial $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Arts $588,671.00 $606,331.13 $624,521.06 $643,256.70 $662,554.40 $682,431.03 Active Adults $107,364.00 $110,584.92 $113,902.47 $117,319.54 $120,839.13 $124,464.30 Fitness Programs $46,800.00 $48,204.00 $49,650.12 $51,139.62 $52,673.81 $54,254.03 Facility Rentals $94,100.00 $96,923.00 $99,830.69 $102,825.61 $105,910.38 $109,087.69 Café $714,400.00 $735,832.00 $757,906.96 $780,644.17 $804,063.49 $828,185.40 Total $1,551,335.00 $1,597,875.05 $1,645,811.30 $1,695,185.64 $1,746,041.21 $1,798,422.45 Expenditures 1th Year 2nd Year 3rd Year 4th Year 5th Year 6th Year Administration $529,650.00 $539,797.00 $550,341.33 $561,298.63 $572,685.14 $584,517.78 Maintenance $156,405.37 $158,146.67 $159,954.70 $161,832.03 $163,781.36 $165,805.46 Custodial $146,055.62 $146,471.62 $146,901.56 $147,345.92 $147,805.18 $148,279.87 Arts $555,180.00 $572,842.00 $591,191.82 $610,256.41 $630,063.79 $650,643.08 Active Adults $145,000.00 $149,105.40 $153,369.89 $157,799.67 $162,401.20 $167,181.18 Fitness Programs $46,357.50 $47,549.70 $48,789.14 $50,077.69 $51,417.31 $52,810.02 Facility Rentals $24,570.00 $24,680.00 $24,794.10 $24,912.46 $25,035.23 $25,162.58 Café $607,240.00 $631,529.60 $656,790.78 $683,062.42 $710,384.91 $738,800.31 Total $2,210,458.49 $2,270,121.99 $2,332,133.32 $2,396,585.22 $2,463,574.12 $2,533,200.28 Total Cost Recovery 70% 70% 71% 71% 71% 71% 90 9 May 2016 City of Edina Financial Plan Outcomes The Financial Plan for the EGCC was developed as a feasibility business plan study – first and foremost focusing on the validity of moving forward with a community asset as well as advanced planning involving a conceptual design and general business planning. This process focuses on the potential of meeting a market need and extrapolating this need to project future operations – revenues and expenditures – based on a conceptual design. A financial plan including a pro forma and support schedules were created to project the financial ramifications resulting from the recommended program and pricing recommended for the Community Center. Operating in a competitive market requires flexibility and an entrepreneurial approach by all management and staff as it pertains to all facets of Community Center operations. Based on all operating assumptions and recommendations set forth within this report, excluding any unforeseen circumstances, the EGCC is projected to recover just over half of the total operating costs related to center operations and require approximately $800,000 in annual subsidy for the foreseeable future. Recreation Center Staffing Staffing requires a delicate balancing act of resource allocation to the core areas and the bottom line. This will necessitate that the Community Center Manager has a keen understanding of all the operations and understands the value of programming the site versus maintaining the site. The staffing levels are a result of outcome expectations. In an effort to allow for the most flexibility in the start-up years of the Community Center, proposed staffing levels (full-time, seasonal) are projected to account for 42.5% direct cost of the operational budget. Based upon assumptions, staffing levels for the EGCC will require a total of 6 full-time positions. These position categories and/or titles are subject to change as operations are further refined in the final business planning phase. These include full-time staff of the following: Community Center Facility Manager – 1 FT position Administrative Manager – 1 FT position Maintenance – 1 FT position Custodial – 2 FT positions Pottery Supervisor – 1 FT position A bevy of seasonal staff to supplement functions such as customer service, maintenance, custodial, Active Adult programming, fitness programming, and facility rental are also included in the staffing projections. It is projected that the Community Center employees – both fulltime and seasonal – will consume approximately $687,000 of the $1.6M annual operational budget. Depending on the EGCC’s success, the most important addition to the staff composition may be in the management of the front line staff – the seasonal employees that are the face of the organization. As such, it is imperative to utilize the Customer Service positions to manage the front of the house effectively. Dedicated and enthusiastic full-time employees will successfully adapt to the ebbs and flow of a customer-centric operation on a daily basis. However, this could pose a problem for seasonal staff, many of whom are projected to work limited hours for the greatest operational flexibility. Accordingly, this balance of resources and customer service will hga commission number 3857-001-00 91 Community Center Feasibility Study make it critical that systems are in place to ensure that front line employees share a common and enthusiastic vision for service delivery. Utilization of seasonal and independent contractors is typically chosen by management for the flexibility they provide – a benefit that allows market factors to determine the need of instructor utilization consequently boosting the goal of fiscal sustainability. Benefits of seasonal and contract instructors are: Ability to offer quality, diverse, and affordable programs with no startup costs to the EGCC. Specialized skill set or training with no cost to the EGCC. Typically, continuity and retention exists. Work on demand – hiring an independent contractor or seasonal staff person offers flexibility to programming which keeps programs “fresh;” increases the ability to take added opportunities as they arise, and during slow periods, have greater cost control. Classes are discontinued when minimum participation levels are not met without incurring the cost of the instructor. Contractors do not require employers to withhold and pay federal, state and Social Security (FICA) taxes as they require for employees. The Community Center Manager obtains the right to terminate Independent Contractor Agreements at any time by giving written notice and contractors are not eligible for unemployment insurance benefits. It is understood that contract instructors are not best suited for all applications. Flexibility should be given to the Community Center Manager in the allocation of contract and or employee instructors to programs. It is possible that use of employee instructors in certain situations could result in a cost savings and/or significant revenue opportunities. Based on the current allocation of funds to contract instructors versus seasonal instructors it is assumed that a shift in philosophy of instructor use to more contracting could be made with minimal effect on the budget. Community Center Memberships and Admissions The preferred design option for the EGCC supports memberships for the Art Center and the Active Adult Center, but as separate enterprises each with specific markets, operational requirements, and pricing strategies. As currently designed, memberships and admissions account for 31% of all revenues. Community centers that are most successful in leveraging membership revenue offer complimentary amenities to attract a broad and frequent user base, such as a fitness center, indoor track, aquatic center, gymnasium, child care facilities, or other assets that promote multi-generational use. However, the findings of the market analysis, community need assessment, and physical site restrictions limited the ability of the EGCC program to include those elements. Membership and admission revenues are projected as follows: Art Center – estimated annual membership revenues of $24,358 and class registration revenue of $388,952; Active Adult Center – estimated annual membership revenues of $20,000; 92 9 May 2016 City of Edina Fitness – estimated annual class admission revenues of $46,800. Community Center Programming Operations and programs must be coordinated for seamless delivery of services; this means that the level of service provided, program, and price point must be harmonious for optimal results. Based on the program plan for the feasibility business plan study, an aggressive program plan has been created around the following core programs: Arts: studio, pottery, ceramics, metal arts, glass, jewelry, retail sales Active Adult: self-directed activities, events, lectures, sports, fitness Fitness: organized classes Facility Rentals: multi-purpose rooms and special events in the Event Venue Common Area / Café: self-directed activities and concession-operated food service These core programs will activate the Center and keep in the building versus a high level of drop in usage. Activities within each core program category can and will change as the market dictates; however, the categorical offering is based on the mission, market, and assets available to administer programs and therefore will remain constant. Revenues by core program area are presented in the summary below. Not all core program areas are expected to cover all of their operational cost. Pro Forma Revenues & Expenditures EDINA GRANDVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER ‐ Option B ONE YEAR SNAPSHOT SUMMARY of PRO FORMA SERVICE TITLE Revenues Expenditures Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Cost Recovery ‐ Percent Administration $0.00 $529,650.00 ($529,650.00)0% Maintenance $0.00 $156,405.37 ($156,405.37)0% Custodial $0.00 $146,055.62 ($146,055.62)0% Arts $588,671.00 $555,180.00 $33,491.00 106% Active Adults $107,364.00 $145,000.00 ($37,636.00)74% Fitness Programs $46,800.00 $46,357.50 $442.50 101% Facility Rentals $94,100.00 $24,570.00 $69,530.00 383% Café $714,400.00 $607,240.00 $107,160.00 118% Total $1,551,335.00 $2,210,458.49 ($659,123.49)70% 17 February 2016 ED I N A G R A N D V I E W C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R CITY COUNCIL REVIEW The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 2 AG E N D A INTRODUCTIONS FE A S I B I L I T Y S T U D Y P R O C E S S REVIEW OF FINDINGS SC O P E A N D B U D G E T A L T E R N A T I V E S CO U N C I L D I S C U S S I O N A N D D I R E C T I O N The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 3 CO N S U L T A N T T E A M HG A A r c h i t e c t s & E n g i n e e r s Vi c t o r P e c h a t y Na n c y B l a n k f a r d Mi c h a e l A n d e r s o n PR O S C o n s u l t i n g Je f f B r a n s f o r d Mi c h a e l S v e t z Su t t o n + A s s o c i a t e s Ge o r g e S u t t o n Sa r a S h a y l i e LE A D E R S H I P T A S K F O R C E AR T S & C U L T U R E C O M M I S S I O N Ra y M e i f e r t An n e M i l l e r PA R K B O A R D El l e n J o n e s Ko r e n N e l s o n EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION Val Burke Cheryl Gunness CITY STAFF Ann Kattreh Susan Faus Michael Frey Donna Tilsner Amanda Clarke The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 4 INTRODUCTIONS FE A S I B I L I T Y S T U D Y P R O C E S S REVIEW OF FINDINGS SC O P E A N D B U D G E T A L T E R N A T I V E S CO U N C I L D I S C U S S I O N A N D D I R E C T I O N The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 5 SC O P E O F W O R K 1. N e e d s A s s e s s m e n t - R e v i e w H i s t o r i c a l D a t a - M a r k e t A n a l y s i s – A r t s a n d R e c r e a t i o n - U s e r G r o u p I n t e r v i e w s a. A c t i v e A d u l t b. A r t C e n t e r c. C o m m u n i c a t i o n & T e c h n o l o g y ( C T S ) d. C o m m u n i t y E d e. H i s t o r i c a l S o c i e t y f. F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s g. Y o u t h - C o m m u n i t y O p e n H o u s e Pr o g r a m V i s i o n I n p u t 61 At t e n d e e s 23 5 Co m m e n t s 2. B u i l d i n g P r o g r a m - C o r e P r o g r a m s - P o t e n t i a l P r o g r a m E n h a n c e m e n t s - A d d i t i o n a l C o n s i d e r a t i o n s 3. C o s t E s t i m a t e s - C a p i t a l C o s t - O p e r a t i n g C o s t 4. S i t e a n d B u i l d i n g F i t P l a n n i n g - A p p l y d e s i r e d p r o g r a m t o s p e c i f i e d s i t e - R e v i e w b l o c k i n g a n d s t a c k i n g a l t e r n a t i v e s - R e f i n e C a p i t a l C o s t E s t i m a t e s - R e f i n e O p e r a t i n g C o s t E s t i m a t e s The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 6 The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 7 INTRODUCTIONS FE A S I B I L I T Y S T U D Y P R O C E S S REVIEW OF FINDINGS SC O P E A N D B U D G E T A L T E R N A T I V E S CO U N C I L D I S C U S S I O N A N D D I R E C T I O N The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 8 MA R K E T A N A L Y S I S S U M M A R Y Pr i m a r y m a r k e t sh o u l d b e i n t h e r a n g e o f a 1 0 - 1 5 d r i v e t i m e f r om t h e s i t e ( s e r v i n g t h e E d i n a p o p u l a t i o n an d a d j o i n i n g c o m m u n i t i e s ) . Gr o w t h is p r o j e c t e d t o b e s l i g h t l y b e l o w t h a t o f n a t i o n a l r a t e s o v e r t h e n e x t f i f t e e n y e a r s . T h e m a k e u p o f th e s e r v i c e a r e a p o p u l a t i o n w i l l c h a n g e a s i t i s e x p e c t ed t o a g e , h o w e v e r , w i l l r e m a i n r e l a t i v e l y a f f l u e n t wi t h i n c o m e l e v e l s a b o v e b o t h s t a t e a n d n a t i o n a l m e d i a n s . Ed i n a r e s i d e n t i a l d e m o g r a p h i c s de m o n s t r a t e a h i g h d e g r e e o f b o t h a f f l u e n c e a n d e d u c a t i o n , ch a r a c t e r i s t i c o f a r t s c o n s u m e r s t h r o u g h o u t t h e c o u n t r y . Lo c a l m a r k e t p o t e n t i a l m e t r i c s (i . e . , M P I s ) s u g g e s t t h a t f i t n e s s a n d e x e r c i s e p r o g r a m m i n g w o u l d b e su c c e s s f u l a t G r a n d v i e w C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r . Su r v e y f i n d i n g s f r o m 2 0 1 4 sh o w e d t h a t i n d o o r f i t n e s s a n d e x e r c i s e f a c i l i t i e s r a n k h i g h l y i n t e r m s o f ov e r a l l c o m m u n i t y n e e d , u n m e t n e e d , i m p o r t a n c e, a n d s p a c e s t h a t r e s i d e n t s w o u l d u s e . The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 9 MA R K E T A N A L Y S I S S U M M A R Y Se n i o r c e n t e r s ra n k e d m o d e r a t e l y , b u t a s e x p e c t e d f o r a f a c i l i t y t h a t i s t a r g e t e d t o a s p e c i f i c a g e se g m e n t . I n d o o r c o u r t s a n d g y m n a s i a r a n k e d m o d e r a t e l y l o w . De s p i t e t h e p r i v a t e f i t n e s s a n d e x e r c i s e p r o v i d e r s in t h e c o m m u n i t y , t h e r e s t i l l a p p e a r s t o b e a n un m e t n e e d f o r b r o a d - b a s e d f a c i l i t i e s t h a t o f f e r w i de a g e - s e g m e n t a p p e a l a n d c a t e r t o a l l e x p e r i e n c e le v e l s . Cr o s s o v e r c u l t u r a l / f i t n e s s / w e l l n e s s p r o g r a m m i n g at t h e G r a n d v i e w f a c i l i t y c o u l d c o m b i n e t h e b e s t o f th e s e t y p e s o f o f f e r i n g s i n a f a c i l i t y d e s i g n e d t o s e r v e r e s i d e n t s o f a l l a g e s a n d a t t r a c t p a r t i c i p a t i o n f r o m th e s u r r o u n d i n g a r e a . Fi t n e s s p r o g r a m s t h a t o f f e r a s o c i a l c o m p o n e n t f o r s e n i o r s co u l d m e s h w e l l w i t h a g e n e r a l co m m u n i t y w e l l n e s s a p p r o a c h t o p r o g r a m m i n g a n e w c e n t e r . Cu r r e n t p r o g r a m m i n g o f E A C co u l d c o m p l e m e n t w e l l n e s s o r i e n t e d a c t i v i t i e s l i k e P i l a t e s , Y o g a a n d mo v e m e n t a n d a l o n g w i t h o t h e r f i t n e s s p r o g r a m s o f f e r a s o c i a l c o m p o n e n t f o r s e n i o r s a n d y o u t h t h a t co n t r i b u t e s t o a h o l i s t i c c o m m u n i t y a p p r o a c h t o p r o g r a m m i n g a n e w c e n t e r . The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 10 SU C C E S S F U L E X I S T I N G P R O G R A M S - S o c i a l e v e n t s - E d u c a t i o n a l d e m o n s t r a t i o n s - F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s a c t i v i t i e s FU T U R E P R O G R A M M I N G D E M A N D - A r t s & h o b b i e s - E x p a n d e d F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s a c t i v i t i e s - S p o r t s OP P O R T U N I T I E S F O R S Y N E R G Y - A r t C e n t e r p r o g r a m s - F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s p r o g r a m s AC T I V E A D U L T US E R G R O U P I N T E R V I E W S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 11 SU C C E S S F U L E X I S T I N G P R O G R A M S - A r t e x h i b i t s - S t u d i o a r t s - E d u c a t i o n a l w o r k s h o p s FU T U R E P R O G R A M M I N G D E M A N D - E n h a n c e d a n d m o r e f u n c t i o n a l e x h i b i t s p a c e - E x p a n d e d s t u d i o a r t s o p t i o n s t o m e e t d e m a n d - I m p r o v e d a c c e s s i b i l i t y a n d b u i l d i n g f u n c t i o n a l i t y OP P O R T U N I T I E S F O R S Y N E R G Y - A c t i v e A d u l t p r o g r a m s - F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s p r o g r a m s - Y o u t h p r o g r a m s - C o m m u n i t y E d u c a t i o n p r o g r a m s - C T S p r o g r a m s - C u l i n a r y A r t s AR T C E N T E R US E R G R O U P I N T E R V I E W S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 12 SU C C E S S F U L E X I S T I N G P R O G R A M S - P u b l i c B r o a d c a s t i n g C h a n n e l - I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s OP P O R T U N I T I E S F O R S Y N E R G Y - A r t C e n t e r p r o g r a m s - Y o u t h p r o g r a m s CT S US E R G R O U P I N T E R V I E W S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 13 SU C C E S S F U L E X I S T I N G P R O G R A M S - P a r e n t / c h i l d c l a s s e s - A f t e r s c h o o l y o u t h a c t i v i t i e s - F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s a c t i v i t i e s - G l o b a l & m u l t i c u l t u r a l i n t e r e s t s - L i f e s k i l l s FU T U R E P R O G R A M M I N G D E M A N D - A r t s & h o b b i e s - E x p a n d e d F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s f o r a l l a g e s - L e c t u r e s OP P O R T U N I T I E S F O R S Y N E R G Y - A r t C e n t e r p r o g r a m s - F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s p r o g r a m s - A c t i v i t y a p p r o p r i a t e p r o g r a m s p a c e CO M M U N I T Y E D US E R G R O U P I N T E R V I E W S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 14 SU C C E S S F U L E X I S T I N G P R O G R A M S - H i s t o r y e x h i b i t s - S c h o o l t r i p s - R e s e a r c h L i b r a r y FU T U R E P R O G R A M M I N G D E M A N D - P e r m a n e n t e x h i b i t s - I n t e r p r e t i v e t r a i l s - I m p r o v e d a c c e s s t o h i s t o r i c a l s i t e s OP P O R T U N I T I E S F O R S Y N E R G Y - C o l l a b o r a t i v e p r o g r a m i n g w i t h A r t C e n t e r a n d Ac t i v e A d u l t s - C e n t r a l l o c a t i o n f o r h i s t o r i c a l e x h i b i t s HI S T O R I C A L SO C I E T Y US E R G R O U P I N T E R V I E W S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 15 SU C C E S S F U L E X I S T I N G P R O G R A M S - L i m i t e d p r o g r a m o f f e r i n g s b y p u b l i c e n t i t i e s FU T U R E P R O G R A M M I N G D E M A N D - F i t n e s s c e n t e r (c a r d i o , c i r c u i t t r a i n i n g , a n d f r e e w e i g h t s ) - G y m n a s i u m a c t i v i t i e s (o p e n g y m s p a c e , o p e n s p o r t s p l a y ) - W e l l n e s s s t u d i o s (T a b a t a , T a i C h i , Y o g a , Z u m b a , e t c . ) OP P O R T U N I T I E S F O R S Y N E R G Y - A c t i v e A d u l t p r o g r a m s - A r t C e n t e r p r o g r a m s - Y o u t h p r o g r a m s FI T N E S S & WE L L N E S S US E R G R O U P I N T E R V I E W S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 16 SU C C E S S F U L E X I S T I N G P R O G R A M S - L i m i t e d i n d o o r p r o g r a m o f f e r i n g s b e y o n d E d i n a P u b l i c Sc h o o l s FU T U R E P R O G R A M M I N G D E M A N D - E a r l y C h i l d h o o d E d u c a t i o n - D r o p - i n c h i l d c a r e - C h i l d r e n ’ s p l a y - S t u d e n t u n i o n OP P O R T U N I T I E S F O R S Y N E R G Y - A r t C e n t e r p r o g r a m s - F i t n e s s & W e l l n e s s p r o g r a m s - H i s t o r i c a l S o c i e t y p r o g r a m s - C T S p r o g r a m s YO U T H US E R G R O U P I N T E R V I E W S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 17 CO M M U N I T Y F E E D B A C K The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 18 CO M M U N I T Y F E E D B A C K The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 19 INTRODUCTIONS FE A S I B I L I T Y S T U D Y P R O C E S S REVIEW OF FINDINGS SC O P E A N D B U D G E T A L T E R N A T I V E S CO U N C I L D I S C U S S I O N A N D D I R E C T I O N The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 20 PR O G R A M S U M M A R Y CO R E P R O G R A M S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 21 PR O G R A M S U M M A R Y PO T E N T I A L P R O G R A M E N H A N C E M E N T S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 22 AD D I T I O N A L C O N S I D E R A T I O N S PR O G R A M O P T I O N S Th e f o l l o w i n g p r o g r a m c o n s i d e r a t i o n s a r e o f f e r e d f o r di s c u s s i o n b a s e d o n c o m m u n i t y o p e n h o u s e i n p u t , re v i e w o f c o m m u n i t y s u r v e y s , a n d l o c a l / n a t i o n a l tr e n d s i n c o m m u n i t y c e n t e r f a c i l i t i e s . Source: ETC Institute, 2014 City of Edina Citizen Survey The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 23 AD D I T I O N A L C O N S I D E R A T I O N S PA R K I N G M E T R I C S Surface Parking $3,500 +/- p e r s t a l l St r u c t u r e d P a r k i n g $2 0 , 0 0 0 + / - p e r s t a l l Be l o w G r a d e P a r k i n g $3 0 , 0 0 0 + / - p e r t a l l The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 24 CA P I T O L C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N A CO R E P R O G R A M S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 25 CA P I T O L C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N B CO R E P R O G R A M S + E V E N T The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 26 CA P I T O L C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N C CO R E P R O G R A M S + C H I L D C A R E + F I T N E S S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 27 CA P I T O L C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N D CO R E P R O G R A M S + C H I L D C A R E + F I T N E S S + G Y M N A S I U M The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 28 CA P I T O L C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N E CO R E P R O G R A M S + C H I L D C A R E + E V E N T + F I T N E S S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 29 CA P I T O L C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N F CO R E + A L L E N H A N C E M E N T P R O G R A M S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 30 OP E R A T I N G C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N A CO R E P R O G R A M S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 31 OP E R A T I N G C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N B CO R E P R O G R A M S + E V E N T The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 32 OP E R A T I N G C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N C CO R E P R O G R A M S + C H I L D C A R E + F I T N E S S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 33 OP E R A T I N G C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N D CO R E P R O G R A M S + C H I L D C A R E + F I T N E S S + G Y M N A S I U M The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 34 OP E R A T I N G C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N E CO R E P R O G R A M S + C H I L D C A R E + E V E N T + F I T N E S S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 35 OP E R A T I N G C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N F CO R E + A L L E N H A N C E M E N T P R O G R A M S The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 36 PR O G R A M O P T I O N S U M M A R Y CA P I T A L + O P E R A T I N G C O S T The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 37 The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 38 The CITY of EDINA CITY COUNCIL REVIEW 17 February 2016 39 DI S C U S S I O N 10 March 2016 ED I N A G R A N D V I E W C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R TASK FORCE MEETING The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 2 SC H E D U L E The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 3 CO M M U N I T Y F E E D B A C K The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 4 CO M M U N I T Y F E E D B A C K 5 CI T Y C O U N C I L R E V I E W The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 6 PR O G R A M O P T I O N S U M M A R Y CA P I T A L + O P E R A T I N G C O S T The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 7 CA P I T O L C O S T – P R O G R A M O P T I O N B CO R E P R O G R A M S + E V E N T 8 SI T E F I T S T U D Y The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 9 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 10 11 SI T E F I T | OP T I O N 1 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 12 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 13 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 14 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 15 EA S T A E R I A L The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 16 EA S T P E R S P E C T I V E The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 17 SO U T H E A S T A E R I A L 18 SI T E F I T | OP T I O N 2 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 19 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 20 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 21 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 22 The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 23 SO U T H E A S T A E R I A L The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 24 EA S T P E R S P E C T I V E The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 25 SO U T H E A S T P E R S P E C T I V E The CITY of EDINA TASK FORCE MEETING 10 March 2016 26 TH A N K Y O U . Ed i n a G r a n d v i e w C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r Pr o g r a m M a y 9 , 2 0 1 6 AR E A D E S C R I P T I O N NOTES NO . O F SP A C E S NO . O F US E R S (M I N ) AS F / US E R AS F / RO O M AS F T O T A L P A R K I N G $ P E R S Q U A R E FO O T TO T A L $ Ar t C e n t e r Ar t C e n t e r C o r e Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n 0 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 Provided in Administration program category Ga l l e r y - S m a l l 1 5 0 0 5 0 0 3 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $1 6 6 , 8 2 2 Ga l l e r y - L a r g e 1 1 , 7 0 0 1 , 7 0 0 10 $3 2 7 . 5 8 $5 5 6 , 8 8 2 Stu d i o - S m a l l 2 4 0 0 8 0 0 5 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $2 7 1 , 7 6 8 Existing area references "Loft" and Lower West Paint Stu d i o M e d i u m 2 6 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 7 $3 4 5 . 7 8 $4 1 4 , 9 3 2 Existing area references "Nichols Studio" Stu d i o L a r g e 1 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 6 $3 5 1 . 8 4 $3 5 1 , 8 4 3 Existing area references "Studio 14" Stu d i o M u l t i p u r p o s e 0 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 Existing area references "Peggy Kelly Media Studios" Gi f t S h o p 1 4 0 0 4 0 0 2 $3 7 6 . 1 1 $1 5 0 , 4 4 3 Existing area references "Gift Shop" Po t t e r y / C e r a m i c s 0 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 0 Existing area references "Main Wheel Room", "Plug Room", "Glaze Room", and Lower West Pottery" H a n d B u i l d i n g S t u d i o 1 6 0 0 6 0 0 4 $3 2 7 . 5 8 $1 9 6 , 5 4 7 W h e e l S t u d i o 2 6 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 7 $3 2 7 . 5 8 $3 9 3 , 0 9 3 L a u n d r y 1 4 0 4 0 0 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $1 3 , 3 4 6 S t o r a g e 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $6 3 , 0 8 9 K i l n 1 1 , 1 0 0 1 , 1 0 0 7 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $3 7 3 , 6 8 1 G u e s t A r t i s t S t u d i o 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $6 6 , 7 2 9 C l a y C l o s e t 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $3 1 , 5 4 5 S p r a y B o o t h 1 5 0 5 0 0 $3 6 3 . 9 8 $1 8 , 1 9 9 L o c k e d C a g e 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $3 3 , 3 6 4 T o o l S t o r a g e 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $3 3 , 3 6 4 C l a y M i x i n g 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $3 8 , 5 8 1 G l a z e M i x i n g 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $3 8 , 5 8 1 G l a z e B a y 3 3 0 0 9 0 0 6 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $2 8 9 , 3 6 0 Me t a l A r t s 1 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 6 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $3 3 3 , 6 4 4 Gl a s s / J e w l r y 1 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 6 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $3 3 3 , 6 4 4 Existing area references "Red Door Room" Sto r a g e 1 1 , 0 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 6 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $3 1 5 , 4 4 5 Lo c k e r s 1 6 5 6 5 0 $3 7 0 . 0 4 $2 4 , 0 5 3 (1 1 5 ) L o c k e r s AS F S U B T O T A L 1 3 , 4 9 5 83 $3 3 4 . 1 2 $4 , 5 0 8 , 9 5 3 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $1 , 1 2 7 , 2 3 8 AR T C E N T E R T O T A L $5 , 6 3 6 , 1 9 1 RE Q U I R E D S P A C E 5/ 9 / 2 0 1 6 1 Ed i n a G r a n d v i e w C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r Pr o g r a m M a y 9 , 2 0 1 6 AR E A D E S C R I P T I O N NOTES NO . O F SP A C E S NO . O F US E R S (M I N ) AS F / US E R AS F / RO O M AS F T O T A L P A R K I N G $ P E R S Q U A R E FO O T TO T A L $ RE Q U I R E D S P A C E Ac t i v e A d u l t Ac t i v e A d u l t C o r e Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n 0 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 Provided in Administration program category Lo b b y 0 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 Provided in Community Gathering program category Co m m o n s 1 2 , 4 0 0 2 , 4 0 0 15 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $8 1 5 , 3 0 4 Accommodates (60) banquet, (100) lecture Mu l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s r o o m 3 9 0 0 2 , 7 0 0 17 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $9 1 7 , 2 1 7 Existing area: (4) Classrooms avg. 880 SF/EA Se m i n a r R o o m 1 5 4 0 5 4 0 3 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $1 8 0 , 1 6 8 Ga m e A r e a 1 9 5 0 9 5 0 6 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $3 1 6 , 9 6 2 Mu l t i p u r p o s e R o o m 0 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 Provided in Fitness & Wellness program category St o r a g e 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $9 4 , 6 3 4 AS F S U B T O T A L 6 , 8 9 0 42 $3 3 7 . 3 4 $2 , 3 2 4 , 2 8 4 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $5 8 1 , 0 7 1 AC T I V E A D U L T T O T A L $2 , 9 0 5 , 3 5 5 Co m m u n i t y G a t h e r i n g Co m m o n s Lo b b y - C o r e P r o g r a m 1 8 0 0 8 0 0 5 $3 9 4 . 3 1 $3 1 5 , 4 4 5 Re c e p t i o n D e s k 1 2 4 0 2 4 0 1 $3 9 4 . 3 1 $9 4 , 6 3 4 Co a t R o o m 1 2 4 0 2 4 0 1 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $7 7 , 1 6 3 Ve n d i n g 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $3 8 , 5 8 1 Fl e x i b l e M e e t i n g S p a c e Mu l t i p u r p o s e C l a s s r o o m 1 9 0 0 9 0 0 6 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $3 0 5 , 7 3 9 Se m i n a r R o o m 1 5 4 0 5 4 0 3 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $1 8 0 , 1 6 8 Se m i n a r S t o r a g e 1 6 0 6 0 0 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $1 8 , 9 2 7 Fo o d S e r v i c e Ca f é R e s t a u r a n t 1 2 , 6 0 0 2 , 6 0 0 16 $3 9 4 . 3 1 $1 , 0 2 5 , 1 9 6 Ca t e r i n g S u p p o r t 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 $3 5 1 . 8 4 $1 0 5 , 5 5 3 Cu l i n a r y A r t s I n s t r u c t i o n 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 $3 5 1 . 8 4 $1 0 5 , 5 5 3 Ev e n t V e n u e Ev e n t V e n u e 1 4 , 5 0 0 4 , 5 0 0 28 $4 5 4 . 9 7 $2 , 0 4 7 , 3 5 9 Banquet (250 person), lecture, theater, music Lig h t i n g a n d A / V C o n t r o l 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 $3 9 4 . 3 1 $7 8 , 8 6 1 Lig h t i n g a n d A / V S t o r a g e 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $6 3 , 0 8 9 Ta b l e a n d C h a i r S t o r a g e 1 6 0 0 6 0 0 4 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $1 8 9 , 2 6 7 Co l l a p s i b l e R i s e r S t o r a g e 1 6 0 0 6 0 0 4 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $1 9 2 , 9 0 7 Gr e e n R o o m 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $1 0 0 , 0 9 3 Dr e s s i n g S u i t e - W o m e n ' s 1 3 6 0 3 6 0 2 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $1 2 2 , 2 9 6 Dr e s s i n g S u i t e - M e n ' s 1 3 6 0 3 6 0 2 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $1 2 2 , 2 9 6 AS F S U B T O T A L 1 3 , 2 2 0 81 $3 9 2 . 0 7 $5 , 1 8 3 , 1 2 5 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $1 , 2 9 5 , 7 8 1 CO M M U N I T Y G A T H E R I N G T O T A L $6 , 4 7 8 , 9 0 7 5/ 9 / 2 0 1 6 2 Ed i n a G r a n d v i e w C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r Pr o g r a m M a y 9 , 2 0 1 6 AR E A D E S C R I P T I O N NOTES NO . O F SP A C E S NO . O F US E R S (M I N ) AS F / US E R AS F / RO O M AS F T O T A L P A R K I N G $ P E R S Q U A R E FO O T TO T A L $ RE Q U I R E D S P A C E Fi t n e s s & W e l l n e s s St u d i o s Fi n e s s & W e l l n e s s S t u d i o - M e d i u m 2 1 , 5 0 0 3 , 0 0 0 18 $3 3 3 . 6 4 $1 , 0 0 0 , 9 3 1 Fi t n e s s & W e l l n e s s S t u d i o - L a r g e 1 2 , 0 0 0 2 , 0 0 0 12 $3 2 7 . 5 8 $6 5 5 , 1 5 5 Fi t n e s s & W e l l n e s s S t u d i o S t o r a g e 3 1 5 0 4 5 0 3 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $1 4 1 , 9 5 0 AS F S U B T O T A L 5 , 4 5 0 34 $3 2 9 . 9 1 $1 , 7 9 8 , 0 3 7 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $4 4 9 , 5 0 9 FI T N E S S & W E L L N E S S T O T A L $2 , 2 4 7 , 5 4 6 Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n Dir e c t o r O f f i c e 3 1 5 0 4 5 0 3 $3 2 7 . 5 8 $1 4 7 , 4 1 0 (1 ) a r t , ( 1 ) s e n i o r , ( 1 ) f a c i l i t y Sta f f O f f i c e - C o r e 6 1 2 0 7 2 0 4 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $2 3 1 , 4 8 8 (2 ) a r t , ( 2 ) s e n i o r , ( 1 ) f a c i l i t y Of f i c e W o r k S t a t i o n s - C o r e P r o g r a m 8 6 4 5 1 2 3 $3 0 3 . 3 1 $1 5 5 , 2 9 6 8'x8' workstations; (6) facility Co n f e r e n c e R o o m 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 2 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $1 0 1 , 9 1 3 (1 0 - 1 2 ) p e r s o n , s e r v e s f a c i l i t y Wo r k R o o m 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 $3 2 7 . 5 8 $6 5 , 5 1 6 Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n S t o r a g e 1 8 0 8 0 0 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $2 5 , 2 3 6 AS F S U B T O T A L 2 , 2 6 2 14 $3 2 1 . 3 3 $7 2 6 , 8 5 8 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $1 8 1 , 7 1 5 AD M I N I S T R A T I O N T O T A L $9 0 8 , 5 7 3 5/ 9 / 2 0 1 6 3 Ed i n a G r a n d v i e w C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r Pr o g r a m M a y 9 , 2 0 1 6 AR E A D E S C R I P T I O N NOTES NO . O F SP A C E S NO . O F US E R S (M I N ) AS F / US E R AS F / RO O M AS F T O T A L P A R K I N G $ P E R S Q U A R E FO O T TO T A L $ RE Q U I R E D S P A C E Bu i l d i n g S u p p o r t Re s t r o o m s - C o r e P r o g r a m 4 2 5 0 1 , 0 0 0 4 $4 9 1 . 3 7 $4 9 1 , 3 6 6 Re s t r o o m s - F a m i l y 1 1 5 0 1 5 0 1 $4 9 1 . 3 7 $7 3 , 7 0 5 Re s t r o o m s - U n i s e x 2 8 0 1 6 0 1 $4 9 1 . 3 7 $7 8 , 6 1 9 Re c e i v i n g / S e r v i c e D o c k 1 4 0 0 4 0 0 2 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $1 2 8 , 6 0 5 Tr a s h / R e c y c l e 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $6 3 , 0 8 9 Bu i l d i n g S t o r a g e 1 4 0 0 4 0 0 2 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $1 2 6 , 1 7 8 La u n d r y 1 2 4 0 2 4 0 1 $3 3 9 . 7 1 $8 1 , 5 3 0 Ve n d i n g 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 $3 2 7 . 5 8 $3 9 , 3 0 9 Bu i l d i n g M a i n t e n a n c e O f f i c e / S h o p 1 4 0 0 4 0 0 2 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $1 2 8 , 6 0 5 Ja n i t o r C l o s e t 4 6 0 2 4 0 1 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $7 5 , 7 0 7 El e v a t o r E q u i p m e n t 1 6 0 6 0 0 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $1 8 , 9 2 7 El e c t r i c a l R o o m 2 1 5 0 3 0 0 1 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $9 4 , 6 3 4 Te l e c o m R o o m 2 1 2 0 2 4 0 1 $3 2 1 . 5 1 $7 7 , 1 6 3 Me c h a n i c a l R o o m : B o i l e r / W a t e r S e r v i c e 1 1 , 2 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 5 $3 1 5 . 4 5 $3 7 8 , 5 3 4 AS F S U B T O T A L 5 , 1 1 0 23 $3 6 3 . 2 0 $1 , 8 5 5 , 9 6 9 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $4 6 3 , 9 9 2 BU I L D I N G S U P P O R T T O T A L $2 , 3 1 9 , 9 6 1 AS F T O T A L 46 , 4 2 7 27 7 $4 4 1 . 4 8 $2 0 , 4 9 6 , 5 3 2 No n a s s i g n a b l e wa l l s , c o r r i d o r s , v e r t i c a l c i r c u l a t i o n , s h a f t s , e t c . ( a l l o w a n c e b a s e d o n 6 7 % e f f i c i e n c y ) 2 2 , 8 6 7 $3 6 3 . 9 8 $8 , 3 2 3 , 0 2 7 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $2 , 0 8 0 , 7 5 7 NO N A S S I G N A B L E T O T A L $1 0 , 4 0 3 , 7 8 4 Si t e En t r y C o u r t 1 1 , 2 0 0 1 , 2 0 0 $2 5 0 . 0 0 $3 0 0 , 0 0 0 Ou t d o o r S e a t i n g / P r o g r a m A r a s 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 Ou t d o o r K i l n A r e a 1 6 , 5 0 0 6 , 5 0 0 $2 5 . 0 0 $1 6 2 , 5 0 0 Ga r d e n 0 0 0 $0 . 0 0 $0 AS F S U B T O T A L 7 , 7 0 0 0 60 . 0 6 $ $4 6 2 , 5 0 0 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $1 1 5 , 6 2 5 SI T E T O T A L $5 7 8 , 1 2 5 GS F T O T A L 67 % E f f i c i e n c y 6 9 , 2 9 4 $4 5 4 . 2 7 $3 1 , 4 7 8 , 4 4 1 5/ 9 / 2 0 1 6 4 Ed i n a G r a n d v i e w C o m m u n i t y C e n t e r Pr o g r a m M a y 9 , 2 0 1 6 AR E A D E S C R I P T I O N NOTES NO . O F SP A C E S NO . O F US E R S (M I N ) AS F / US E R AS F / RO O M AS F T O T A L P A R K I N G $ P E R S Q U A R E FO O T TO T A L $ RE Q U I R E D S P A C E Pa r k i n g Co r e P r o g r a m 2 7 0 2 7 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $8 , 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 Ar t E n h a n c e d P r o g r a m 0 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $0 Dr o p - i n C h i l d c a r e 0 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $0 Ch i l d r e n ' s P l a y S t r u c t u r e 0 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $0 Ev e n t V e n u e 8 0 8 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $2 , 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 Fit n e s s C e n t e r 0 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $0 Gy m n a s i u m 0 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $0 He a l t h c a r e P a r t n e r 0 0 $3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $0 AS F S U B T O T A L 3 5 0 0 30 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ $1 0 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 PR O J E C T S O F T C O S T S $1 , 0 5 0 , 0 0 0 SIT E A M E N I T I E S T O T A L $1 1 , 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 5/ 9 / 2 0 1 6 5 17 May 2016 EDINA GRANDVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 2 SEVEN GUIDING PRINCIPLES GRANDVIEW DISTRICT 1. Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected district that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. 2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the district a good place to do business. 3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. 4. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-filled place. 5. Organize parking as an effective resource for the district by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the district for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. 7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 3 •Demographic Analysis Population Age segmentation Household Income Race •National & Local Trends •Neighboring Community Facilities •Review Survey Data (ETC Institute, 2014 City of Edina Citizen Survey) PROGRAMMING MARKET ANALYSIS FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 4 •Active Adult •Art Center •Communication & Technology (CTS) •Community Education •Historical Society •Fitness & Wellness •Youth PROGRAMMING USER GROUP MEETINGS FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 5 Open House 1 | Program Visioning Open House 2 | Design Review PROGRAMMING COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSES FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 6 2/17/2016 CITY COUNCIL DIRECTION CITY COUNCIL REVIEW PROGRAM OPTIONS FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 7 CITY COUNCIL REVIEW PREFERRED PROGRAM | OPTION B FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 8 FIT PLANS OVERVIEW EAST AERIAL EAST PERSPECTIVE SOUTHEAST AERIAL FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 17 CAPITAL COST BUILDING & PARKING FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 18 SERVICE TITLE Revenues Expenditures Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Cost Recovery - Percent Administration $0 $529,650 ($529,650)0% Maintenance $0 $156,405 ($156,405)0% Custodial $0 $146,056 ($146,056)0% Arts $588,671 $555,180 $33,491 106% Active Adults $107,364 $145,000 ($37,636)74% Fitness Programs $46,800 $46,358 $443 101% Facility Rentals $94,100 $24,570 $69,530 383% Café $714,400 $607,240 $107,160 118% Total $1,551,335 $2,210,458 ($659,123)70% OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENDITURES PRO FORMA | ONE YEAR SUMMARY FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 19 Revenues Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Maintenance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Custodial $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Arts $588,671 $606,331 $624,521 $643,257 $662,554 $682,431 Active Adults $107,364 $110,585 $113,902 $117,320 $120,839 $124,464 Fitness Programs $46,800 $48,204 $49,650 $51,140 $52,674 $54,254 Facility Rentals $94,100 $96,923 $99,831 $102,826 $105,910 $109,088 Café $714,400 $735,832 $757,907 $780,644 $804,063 $828,185 Total $1,551,335 $1,597,875 $1,645,811 $1,695,186 $1,746,041 $1,798,422 Expenditures Administration $529,650 $539,797 $550,341 $561,299 $572,685 $584,518 Maintenance $156,405 $158,147 $159,955 $161,832 $163,781 $165,805 Custodial $146,056 $146,472 $146,902 $147,346 $147,805 $148,280 Arts $555,180 $572,842 $591,192 $610,256 $630,064 $650,643 Active Adults $145,000 $149,105 $153,370 $157,800 $162,401 $167,181 Fitness Programs $46,358 $47,550 $48,789 $50,078 $51,417 $52,810 Facility Rentals $24,570 $24,680 $24,794 $24,912 $25,035 $25,163 Café $607,240 $631,530 $656,791 $683,062 $710,385 $738,800 Total $2,210,458 $2,270,122 $2,332,133 $2,396,585 $2,463,574 $2,533,200 Total Cost Recovery 70%70%71%71%71%71% OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENDITURES PRO FORMA | SIX YEAR FINAL PRESENTATION 17 May 2016 20 THANK YOU. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Braemar Golf Course Renovation Bid Authorization Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the public bidding process for the Braemar Golf Course regulation course renovation. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Braemar Summary Proforma Braemar Plan Rendering Braemar Cost Estimate Braemar Golf Course Presentation 5-17-17 May 17, 2016 Mayor and City Council Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Information / Background: Staff and Richard Mandell will be presenting the final Braemar Golf Course master plan and requesting City Council’s authorization to seek bids for the regulation golf course renovation. On May 12, 2015 staff recommended to the Park Board Option #5 of the Richard Mandell Renovation Business Plan, an 18-hole golf course that stays within the 27-hole footprint of the existing golf course, with an alternate use for the remaining park property. The alternate use park concepts include, but are not limited to, winter sports, recreational trails and environmental education areas. The Park Board voted unanimously to support staff recommendation and to proceed with the process. On June 2, 2015 City Council approved staff’s recommendation and directed them to proceed with the master planning process. A rendering of the master plan, a construction cost estimate and pro forma are attached. The project budget estimate remains on track with Richard Mandell’s April 2015 Renovation Business Plan estimate and the pro forma is favorable with just a modest 2% average increase in fees every other year. In the April 2015 Renovation Business Plan, prior to detailed design and construction document creation, Option #5 was estimated to cost $6,359,521.14. With final design and construction REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 documents completed, the current project estimate is $6,318,344.04. This estimate also includes a $63,600 for bocce courts and $38,720 for walking trails which will be included as project alternates. Staff and SEH have been working closely with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, the Army Corps of Engineers, Hennepin County and the Minnesota Bureau of Water and Soil Resources on project permitting. The process is going extremely well and staff is confident that all necessary permits will be received by the end of July 2016. The Driving Range and Academy 9 will remain fully open during construction as will the Tin Fish restaurant. Many leagues and regulation course golfers will move to the Academy 9 during construction. Braemar staff is working with other local golf courses to arrange for league play and general customer play during construction. Braemar staff will be completing a robust construction update email and social media campaign to keep golfers and residents informed and interested throughout the construction process. Keller Golf Course utilized a successful construction campaign that Braemar will model. Project Timeline: March 18, 2014 - The City Council approved a motion to immediately start the master plan for Braemar Golf Course with funding from the Braemar Memorial Fund. April 22, 2014 – The City Council passed a motion to form a Braemar Master Plan Task Force to begin the Braemar master planning process. June 17, 2014 – The City Council approved the selection of the Braemar Master Plan Task Force appointments. Rick Ites, Pacy Erck, Joseph Hulbert, Dick Brozic and Paul Presthus were selected by an application and interview process as well as Brenda McCormick and David Deeds who were appointed by the Park Board. Rick Ites was selected as the chairperson to lead the Master Plan Task Force. July 28, 2014 - The Request for Proposal for a golf course architect for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan was advertised. Aug. 22, 2014 - Twenty-eight (28) consultants from all over the country submitted proposals in response to the Braemar Master Plan RFP. Of the 28, five were selected by staff to be interviewed and evaluated by the task force. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 August 2015 - A National Golf Foundation - GolfSAT Survey was conducted. 739 Braemar Golf Course patrons responded. The survey helped structure the Master Plan Task Force objectives and mission statement. Sept. 8-10, 2014 - Architectural design interviews were conducted by the Master Plan Task Force. Sept. 16, 2014 - The City Council approved the Task Force recommendation of Richard Mandell Golf Architecture Consulting Services to complete the Master Plan at Braemar Golf Course. October 2014 - Richard Mandell conducted multiple site walks with community residents (over 75 residents participated), environmental agencies and the Master Plan Task Force as well as held an open house to gather feedback for the Master Plan. January 2015 – Richard Mandell once again met with community residents (over 100 residents participated), environmental agencies and the Master Plan Task Force to discuss preliminary concepts for the future of the Braemar Golf facility. Jan. 13, 2015 - Mandell presented the Park Board preliminary concepts for consideration. Feb. 17, 2015 - Mandell presented City Council preliminary concepts for consideration. April 14, 2015 - Mandell submitted the final Renovation Business Plan for task force and staff review. May 6, 2015 - Master Plan work session with City Council, Park Board, staff and Master Plan Task Force. May 12, 2015 - Staff made a recommendation of Option #5 of the RMGA Renovation Business Plan to the Park Board. The Park Board voted unanimously in favor of the staff recommendation. June 2, 2015 – Staff made a recommendation of Option #5 of the RMGA Renovation Business Plan to the City Council. The City Council directed staff to enter into contract negotiations with RMGA to provide design and construction documents and to oversee bid and construction administration for a renovated 18- hole golf course on the current Braemar Golf Course property. The City Council also directed staff to enter into contract negotiations with Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) to complete the wetland and water resource services for the proposed golf course modifications. These include wetland delineations, wetland permitting, wetland mitigation design and watershed districts requirements. June 17, 2015 – City Council approved Richard Mandell’s proposal to provide design and construction documents and to oversee bid and construction administration for a renovated 18- hole golf course on the current Braemar Golf Course property. Aug. 13, 2015 – Mandell met with staff and received preliminary Master Plan direction. Sept. 25, 2015 - Mandell met with staff and City Council to review Preliminary Master Plan. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Nov. 5, 2015 – Mandell presented Preliminary Master Plan to public. March 8, 2016 - Mandell met with staff to review Design Development Plans. April 7, 2016 – Mandell and SEH submitted initial Wetland Replacement Plans for review. April 13, 2016 - Mandell and SEH submitted plans to Army Corps of Engineers for processing. April 13, 2016 – Nine Mile Creek Watershed District accepted Wetland Replacement Plans. Future Schedule: May 9, 2016 – Permit application review with Hennepin County, Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources, Army Corps of Engineers and SEH to review Combined Wetland Permit Application. May 10, 2016 – Final review and comment from the Park Board on the Braemar master plan. May 13, 2016 - Mandell and SEH will be submitting final plans for Combined Wetland Permit Application. May 17, 2016 – Staff and Richard Mandell will be requesting approval from City Council to start the public bidding process for the Braemar Golf Course renovation project. May 2016 – Begin public bidding process for the Braemar Master Plan Project. June 15, 2016 - Expected approval of Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit and Wetland Conservation Act permit. July 2016 - Expected approval of Army Corps of Engineers permits. June 2016 – Planned award of bid for golf course construction. August 2016 – Opening of the Academy 9 (new par 3 course) and grass tee at driving range. October 2016 – Planned start date for the Braemar Master Plan construction project. June 2018 – Planned completion date for construction. July/August 2018 – Grand Opening of the completely renovated Braemar Regulation Golf Course. Conclusion In July 2013 under the direction of the Park Board and City Council, staff began to study the operations of the City of Edina golf enterprise. The goal of the operational study was to make golf operations cover 100% of its operational costs including future bonding needs so that the city is able to improve its facilities to ensure our ability to provide high quality golf facilities along with superior service to our customers. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 5 The renovation of the regulation course will complete the vision and plan started by the Park Board, City Council and staff in 2013. The new (November 2013) golf dome provides year-round access to golf practice and instruction. The new driving range is the largest in the state and is of premier quality. The Academy 9 will provide a fun, fair and beautiful option for golfers of all ages and abilities. The regulation renovation is being described as having some of the best par 5s in the region. The regulation course has been designed with kids, women and seniors in mind to ensure that all golfers have an equally fun and equally challenging experience. At the conclusion of construction, the City of Edina and Braemar Golf Course will have the finest golf facilities in the metro and arguably the state and region. The CITY of EDINA Br a e m a r M a s t e r P l a n Pr o f o r m a ww w . E d i n a M N . g o v 1 Br a e m a r G o l f O p e r a t i o n P r o f o r m a 20 1 8 , 2 0 2 0 & 2 0 2 2 2 % r a t e i n c r e a s e Ac c o u n t A c t u a l 20 1 1 Ac t u a l 20 1 2 Ac t u a l 20 1 3 Ac t u a l 20 1 4 Pr o j e c t e d 20 1 5 Pr o j e c t e d 20 1 6 Pr o j e c t e d 20 1 7 Pr o j e c t e d 20 1 8 Pr o j e c t e d 20 1 9 Projected 2020Projected 2021Projected 2022 TO T A L O P E R A T I N G R E V E N U E 3, 2 8 1 , 2 2 5 3 , 2 2 5 , 5 9 1 2 , 7 1 1 , 7 4 2 3 , 2 2 9 , 3 4 8 2 , 8 5 7 , 1 9 1 3 , 0 1 1 , 66 5 1 , 2 6 9 , 5 1 6 2 , 8 4 1 , 5 5 8 3 , 5 0 8 , 8 2 8 3 , 5 8 7 , 6 3 0 3 , 6 2 3 , 5 0 7 3 , 7 05,218 TO T A L O P E R A T I N G E X P E N S E (3 , 3 8 3 , 1 1 1 ) ( 3 , 2 8 6 , 5 1 5 ) ( 3 , 1 8 0 , 7 1 8 ) ( 3 , 3 0 0 , 5 4 4 ) ( 2 , 8 5 1 , 50 0 ) ( 3 , 0 6 4 , 6 0 0 ) ( 1 , 9 5 6 , 5 1 6 ) ( 2 , 9 5 8 , 7 5 1 ) ( 3 , 2 5 8 , 0 3 6 ) ( 3 , 358,033) ( 3 , 4 5 9 , 4 7 1 ) ( 3 , 5 6 3 , 3 9 0 ) OP E R A T I N G I N C O M E ( L O S S ) (1 0 1 , 8 8 5 ) ( 6 0 , 9 2 5 ) ( 4 6 8 , 9 7 5 ) ( 7 1 , 1 9 6 ) 5, 6 9 1 (5 2 , 9 3 5 ) ( 6 8 7 , 0 0 0 ) ( 1 1 7 , 1 9 3 ) 25 0 , 7 9 2 2 2 9 , 5 9 8 1 6 4 , 0 3 6 1 4 1 , 8 2 8 E S T I M A T E D A N N U A L C A S H F L O W 36 5 , 0 0 4 7 , 4 3 4 , 6 6 1 (7 , 9 5 2 , 0 3 9 ) 12 0 , 8 0 7 1 4 2 , 7 9 2 2 5 9 , 5 9 8 2 2 9 , 0 3 6 2 5 1 , 8 2 8 Br a e m a r G o l f C o u r s e Br a e m a r U n i t C o s t = H i g h e r o f A & B + 1 0 % Co n s t r u c t i o n E s t i m a t e Co n s t r u c t i o n D o c u m e n t s P h a s e Ne w 1 8 H o l e G o l f C o u r s e A B Br a e m a r Braemar 5/ 6 / 2 0 1 6 It e m Un i t C o s t Un i t C o s t Un i t C o s t Qu a n t i t y Unit Total PR O J E C T P R E P A R A T I O N Mo b i l i z a t i o n ( L S ) 73 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 $ 19 6 , 4 8 0 . 0 0 $ 17 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1. 0 0 LS 171,000.00 $ La y o u t / S t a k i n g 1, 5 8 0 . 0 0 $ 2, 4 8 3 . 2 0 $ 2, 4 8 3 . 2 0 $ 18 . 0 0 EA 44,697.60 $ Re - L o c a t e B a t h r o o m S e w e r & W a t e r # 1 4 / # 1 5 45 . 0 0 $ 20 0 . 0 0 LF 9,000.00 $ CL E A R I N G , G R U B B I N G , & D E M O L I T I O N Sp r a y a n d R o t o v a t e E x i s t i n g T u r f ( A C ) 2, 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 96 0 . 0 0 $ 2, 3 2 0 . 0 0 $ 15 0 . 6 0 AC 349,392.00 $ Bu l k C l e a r i n g 6, 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 16 , 0 4 4 . 0 0 $ 9, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 12 . 6 4 AC 113,760.00 $ Se l e c t i v e C l e a r i n g ( B y T r e e ) 40 0 . 0 0 $ 19 6 . 0 0 $ 40 0 . 0 0 $ 66 1 . 0 0 EA 264,400.00 $ Br i d g e s T o R e m o v e ( 6 ) 6, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6. 0 0 36,000.00 $ ER O S I O N C O N T R O L Si l t F e n c e ( P A , M S , o r H I ) 3. 0 0 $ 1. 0 8 $ 3. 0 0 $ 39 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 LF 117,000.00 $ Si l t F e n c e ( T B ) 3. 0 0 $ 1. 0 8 $ 7. 0 0 $ 21 5 . 0 0 LF 1,505.00 $ Fa i r w a y E r o s i o n C o n t r o l B l a n k e t s 8, 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 5, 8 8 0 . 0 0 $ 7, 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 6. 0 4 AC 45,300.00 $ Bi o r o l l s 2. 2 0 $ 2, 2 0 0 . 0 0 LF 4,840.00 $ Tr e e P r o t e c t i o n 1. 5 6 $ 2. 5 2 $ 2. 5 2 $ 3, 0 0 0 . 0 0 LF 7,560.00 $ In l e t P r o t e c t i o n 60 . 0 0 $ 88 . 2 0 $ 18 5 . 0 0 $ 13 9 . 0 0 EA 25,715.00 $ Co n s t r u c t i o n E n t r a n c e 4, 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1, 6 8 0 . 0 0 $ 4, 8 0 0 . 0 0 $ 2. 0 0 EA 9,600.00 $ TO P S O I L M A N A G E M E N T 6" O n s i t e - S t r i p p i n g a n d S t o c k p i l i n g ( C Y ) 2. 0 0 $ 1. 3 0 $ 2. 0 0 $ 90 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 CY 181,200.00 $ 6" O n s i t e - R e p l a c e m e n t a n d S p r e a d i n g 2. 7 2 $ 1. 3 0 $ 2. 7 2 $ 90 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 CY 246,432.00 $ BU L K E A R T H W O R K Bu l k E a r t h w o r k ( C Y ) 2. 5 6 $ 1. 8 0 $ 2. 5 6 $ 26 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 CY 678,400.00 $ PO N D E X P A N S I O N Po n d C o n s t r u c t i o n ( C Y ) - d e w a t e r i n g 8. 7 6 $ 0. 8 4 $ 8. 7 6 $ 1, 0 0 0 . 0 0 CY 8,760.00 $ Po n d L i n e r -$ WE T L A N D C O N S T R U C T I O N Co n s t r u c t i o n ( C Y ) - d e w a t e r i n g 8. 7 6 $ 0. 8 4 $ 8. 7 6 $ 6, 5 0 0 . 0 0 CY 56,940.00 $ SH A P I N G F e a t u r e S h a p e r / O w n e r R e p . 22 4 , 5 2 8 . 0 0 $ 15 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 13 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 $ 11 . 0 0 MONTH 148,500.00 $ Fe a t u r e S h a p e r E q u i p m e n t R e n t a l a n d F u e l 8, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8. 0 0 MONTH 64,000.00 $ Te e C o m p l e x S h a p i n g 6, 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 18 . 0 0 T. Complex 108,000.00 $ EA DR A I N A G E 2" P e r f o r a t e d H D P E P i p e 4. 0 0 $ 4. 0 0 $ 4. 0 0 $ 0. 0 0 LF -$ 4” S o l i d H D P E P i p e G r e e n & B u n k e r O u t l e t s 5. 0 5 $ 48 8 2 . 0 0 LF 2 4 , 6 5 4 . 1 0 $ 6" S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 9. 0 0 $ 7. 0 6 $ 9. 0 0 $ 7, 2 5 0 . 0 0 LF 65,250.00 $ 8" S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 10 . 4 0 $ 8. 2 0 $ 10 . 4 0 $ 5, 9 1 6 . 0 0 LF 61,526.40 $ 10 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 12 . 0 0 $ 9. 8 3 $ 12 . 0 0 $ 2, 4 8 6 . 0 0 LF 29,832.00 $ 12 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 13 . 2 0 $ 11 . 3 0 $ 13 . 2 0 $ 54 8 . 0 0 LF 7,233.60 $ 18 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 18 . 8 0 $ 18 . 4 8 $ 18 . 8 0 $ 58 1 . 0 0 LF 10,922.80 $ 24 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 29 . 6 0 $ 24 . 0 0 $ 29 . 6 0 $ 17 0 . 0 0 LF 5,032.00 $ 30 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 36 . 0 0 $ 28 . 8 0 $ 36 . 0 0 $ 0. 0 0 LF -$ 36 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 41 . 6 0 $ 34 . 4 0 $ 41 . 6 0 $ 0. 0 0 LF -$ 42 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 49 . 6 0 $ 40 . 8 0 $ 49 . 6 0 $ 0. 0 0 LF -$ 48 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 68 . 8 0 $ 48 . 0 0 $ 68 . 8 0 $ 0. 0 0 LF -$ 60 " S o l i d H D P E P i p e ( N - 1 2 A D S ) 80 . 0 0 $ 72 . 0 0 $ 80 . 0 0 $ 0. 0 0 LF -$ Dr a i n a g e I n l e t s 22 0 . 0 0 $ 16 8 . 0 0 $ 35 0 . 0 0 $ 13 9 . 0 0 EA 48,650.00 $ Ca t c h B a s i n s 68 0 . 0 0 $ 60 0 . 0 0 $ 68 0 . 0 0 $ 0. 0 0 EA -$ TE E C O N S T R U C T I O N Te e C o n s t r u c t i o n ( 8 3 ) 0. 3 6 $ 0. 4 4 $ 0. 4 4 $ 17 1 , 1 6 8 . 0 0 SF 75,313.92 $ Te e B o x 4 " C a p p i n g - I n s t a l l a t i o n o n l y ( t o n ) 8. 0 0 $ 8. 0 0 $ 8. 0 0 $ 3, 1 5 0 . 0 0 TON 25,200.00 $ GR E E N C O N S T R U C T I O N Gr e e n s C o n s t r u c t i o n ( 2 1 ) 3. 6 0 $ 2. 7 2 $ 3. 6 0 $ 15 0 , 8 2 3 . 0 0 SF 542,962.80 $ Gr e e n s C o l l a r C o n s t r u c t i o n 3. 6 0 $ 2. 7 2 $ 3. 6 0 $ 20 , 1 5 1 . 0 0 SF -$ SA N D B U N K E R C O N S T R U C T I O N Sa n d T r a p p e r B u n k e r C o n s t r u c t i o n ( 4 6 ) 5. 0 0 $ 3. 7 8 $ 3. 7 5 $ 42 , 9 1 2 . 0 0 SF 160,920.00 $ CA R T P A T H R E M O V A L & C O N S T R U C T I O N Re m o v a l o f 7 ' C a r t P a t h ( O n s i t e L F ) 1. 3 6 $ 2. 0 8 $ 2. 0 0 $ 13 , 0 7 3 . 0 0 LF 26,146.00 $ Re m o v a l o f C a r t P a t h A r e a s ( O n s i t e S F ) 2. 3 6 $ 3. 6 5 $ 0. 3 0 $ 26 , 7 7 7 . 0 0 SF 8,033.10 $ 7' A s p h a l t C a r t P a t h C o n s t . ( L F ) 19 . 6 4 $ 13 . 0 4 $ 19 . 0 0 $ 27 , 1 2 1 . 0 0 LF 343,532.67 $ 12 ' A s p h a l t C a r t P a t h C o n s t . ( L F ) 27 . 7 2 $ 19 . 5 5 $ 27 . 7 2 $ 50 3 . 0 0 LF 9,295.44 $ As p h a l t C a r t S t a g i n g A r e a ( S F ) 3. 1 2 $ 1. 6 3 $ 3. 1 2 $ 14 , 1 0 7 . 0 0 SF 29,342.56 $ 7 A s p h a l t C a r t P a t h T u r n - A r o u n d s ( S F ) 3. 1 2 $ 1. 6 3 $ 3. 1 2 $ 4, 9 2 0 . 0 0 SF 10,233.60 $ Pr o p o s e d W a l k i n g T r a i l s 30 . 8 4 $ 22 . 8 2 $ 11 . 0 0 $ 5, 2 8 0 . 0 0 LF 38,720.00 $ BR I D G E S Ne w 1 2 ' W i d e B r i d g e s ( 3 ) 0. 3 6 $ 0. 4 4 $ 60 0 . 0 0 $ 14 0 . 0 0 LF 84,000.00 $ Ex i s t i n g B r i d g e s t o R e m a i n ( 6 ) - $ - $ - $ 26 8 . 0 0 LF AN C H O R B L O C K R E T A I N I N G W A L L #1 3 T e e s R e t a i n i n g W a l l s ( 2 ) $6 0 . 0 0 $2 5 . 0 0 $3 6 . 0 0 67 5 . 0 0 ff 24,300.00 $ IR R I G A T I O N Ir r i g a t i o n / P u m p S t a t i o n / P u m p h o u s e 97 5 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 $ 1. 0 0 LS 975,000.00 $ SE E D B E D P R E P A R A T I O N Se e d b e d P r e p a n d F i n i s h W o r k ( A C ) 2, 6 1 2 . 0 0 $ 2, 0 8 0 . 0 0 $ 3, 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 14 3 . 4 0 AC 458,880.00 $ So i l A m e n d m e n t s ( A C ) - $ 42 5 . 0 0 $ 25 0 . 0 0 $ 0. 0 0 AC -$ GR A S S I N G Se e d G r e e n s ( T 1 B e n t ) 0. 0 7 $ 0. 0 5 $ 0. 0 7 $ 15 0 , 8 2 3 . 0 0 SF 10,859.26 $ Se e d G r e e n S u r r o u n d s ( E l i t e K e n t u c k y B l u e g r a s s ) 0. 1 2 $ 0. 0 5 $ 0. 0 8 $ 20 , 1 5 1 . 0 0 SF 1,612.08 $ Se e d T e e s ( E l i t e K e n t u c k y B l u e g r a s s ) 0. 1 1 $ 0. 0 5 $ 0. 0 4 $ 17 1 , 1 6 8 . 0 0 SF 6,846.72 $ Se e d F a i r w a y s ( E l i t e K e n t u c k y B l u e g r a s s ) 1, 9 2 0 . 0 0 $ 1, 2 8 0 . 0 0 $ 1, 5 6 5 . 0 0 $ 36 . 2 8 AC 56,778.20 $ Se e d R o u g h ( E l i t e K e n t u c k y B l u e g r a s s ) 1, 5 8 0 . 0 0 $ 64 0 . 0 0 $ 1, 5 8 0 . 0 0 $ 34 . 0 6 AC 53,814.80 $ Se e d O a k S a v a n n a P r a i r i e A r e a s 2, 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ 50 4 . 0 0 $ 2, 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 37 . 5 0 AC 81,000.00 $ Se e d T r a n s i t i o n A r e a s B e t w e e n C . P a t h & O a k S a v a n n a 2, 1 8 0 . 0 0 $ 50 4 . 0 0 $ - $ 0. 0 0 AC See Above Se e d W e t l a n d M i t i g a t i o n A r e a s 2, 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 5. 1 4 AC 11,102.40 $ Se e d W e t l a n d B u f f e r A r e a s 2, 1 6 0 . 0 0 $ 25 . 1 5 AC 54,324.00 $ So d A l l o w a n c e 0. 3 5 $ 0. 2 0 $ 0. 3 5 $ 65 0 , 0 0 0 SF 228,800.00 $ OA K S A V A N N A T R E E P L A N T I N G S 2. 5 " D i a . ( L a r g e & M e d i u m D e c i d u o u s ) 34 4 . 0 0 $ 34 0 . 2 0 $ 34 4 . 0 0 $ 27 6 EA 94,944.00 $ BO C C E B A L L C O U R T S Bo c c e B a l l C o u r t C o n s t r u c t i o n ( S F ) 6. 0 0 $ 6. 0 0 $ 6. 0 0 $ 10 , 6 0 0 . 0 0 SF 63,600.00 $ Sub-Total 6,420,664.04 $ NO N - G O L F I T E M S ( I N C L U D E D A B O V E ) 102,320.00 $ Sub-Total 6,318,344.04 $ Braemar Golf Course Renovation Bid Authorization Golf Operations Study 2013-2014 Six-Step Strategy 1.Narrow the Scope of Golf Operations 2.Invest in improvements at Braemar 3.Modify prices and discounts 4.Outsource ancillary services 5.Expand marketing 6.Improve customer service www.EdinaMN.gov 2 Braemar – Key Dates •March 18, 2014 - City Council authorized master planning process. •June 17, 2014 - City Council appointed the Braemar Master Plan Task Force. •- Rick Ites, Pacy Erck, Paul Presthus, Dick Brozic, Joseph Hulbert, Brenda McCormick, David Deeds •September 16, 2014 - Richard Mandell hired •June 2, 2015 – City Council approved Option #5 - An 18-hole renovation that stays within the 27-hole footprint of the golf course. www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Braemar Project Timeline •May 17, 2016 – Project bid authorization •May 23, 2016 – Bid process opens •June/July 2016 – Environmental agency permit approvals •July 19, 2016 – Award bid •October 2016 – Construction begins •June 2018 – Construction completed •August 2018 – Course opens www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Braemar Budget Estimate Construction $6,500,000 Design $ 450,000 Staff Grow-In $ 550,000 Total $7,500,000 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Braemar Master Plan Proforma www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Braemar Golf Operation Proforma 2018, 2020 & 2022 2% rate increase Account Actual 2011 Actual 2012 Actual 2013 Actual 2014 Projected 2015 Projected 2016 Projected 2017 Projected 2018 Projected 2019 Projected 2020 Projected 2021 Projected 2022 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,711,742 3,229,348 2,857,191 3,011,665 1,269,516 2,841,558 3,508,828 3,587,630 3,623,507 3,705,218 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (3,383,111)(3,286,515)(3,180,718)(3,300,544)(2,851,500)(3,064,600)(1,956,516)(2,958,751)(3,258,036)(3,358,033)(3,459,471)(3,563,390) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(101,885)(60,925)(468,975)(71,196)5,691 (52,935)(687,000)(117,193)250,792 229,598 164,036 141,828 ESTIMATED ANNUAL CASH FLOW 365,004 7,434,661 (7,952,039)120,807 142,792 259,598 229,036 251,828 www.EdinaMN.gov 7 Staff Request •Authorize the public bidding process for the Braemar Golf Course regulation course renovation. www.EdinaMN.gov 8 Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Braemar Park Winter Recreation Proposal Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a motion to begin the feasibility study for the financial feasibility and trail design for a snow tubing and cross country skiing operation at Braemar Park. Approve the Agreement with the SEH team to proceed with the financial feasibility study and trail design. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Braemar Winter Recreation Proposal EHS Nordic Ski Support SEH Agreement for Braemar Winter Recreation Area SEH Statement of Qualifications Braemar Winter Recreation Presentation May 17, 2016 Mayor and City Council Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Braemar Park Winter Recreation Proposal Information / Background: On June 2, 2015 the City Council voted to approve Option #5 of the master plan of Braemar Golf Course. Option #5 includes a new 18 hole regulation course with minimal disturbance. Minimal disturbance in this case means that the hill on the east side of the golf course will not be removed either partially or totally. This option allows us to spread 18 holes over the existing 27-hole footprint to improve play and safety by widening fairways and eliminating forced carries. This also leaves some golf course property to convert to park land for all residents to utilize for a variety of recreational pursuits. Project Opportunities Staff will present a preliminary proposal to add cross country ski trails and snow tubing with man- made snow at Braemar Park. Braemar Park has the potential to be a popular winter recreation area with tubing, sledding, walking, snowshoeing, cross country skiing, skijoring and fat tire biking on both man-made and natural snow while utilizing the beauty and varied terrain of the park. Braemar Park potentially has the ability to create a 2.5k loop of man-made snow for skiing with approximately 30% beginner, 20% intermediate and 50% advanced trails. The loop could be used by the high school cross country ski team and distances in multiples of 5k could be created. The trail could be used for practices and competition and could potentially be lighted. The lower level of the clubhouse could also be renovated to house the high school cross country ski program to include storage, changing and waxing areas. The high school coaches and athletic director have been included in all discussions to date and are very interested in moving their operations to Braemar. The Nine Mile Creek Trail and construction on the high school campus will be significantly impacting the cross country ski trails at the high school. Due to the steep terrain and in order to construct the trail in the most cost effective manner, a 50’ wide trail may be created up and on the top of the hill to create an out and back ski trail for skate STAFF REPORT Page 2 and classic style nordic skiing. The man-made loop could also connect to a natural snow trail that could meander around the golf course, significantly increasing the percentage of beginner level trails. As many as 10 – 12 snow tube lanes could be added on the hill on the east side of the golf course at the current location of hole 21 on the Clunie 9. These new areas could also be utilized during the non-snow months for walking, biking, running and scenic overlooks. The large, adjacent parking lot is a tremendous asset to a winter recreation destination as are the clubhouse, the Tin Fish restaurant and the city-owned well on the east side of the property that could be used for snowmaking. This project also utilizes the opportunity to design and construct the winter trails at the same time that the golf course is under construction. Trails around the golf course, which would not impact play areas, are also being defined. Staffing efficiencies would also be realized because Braemar Golf Course staff would be able to lead the snowmaking, grooming and administrative duties of the winter recreation area. Braemar Park is the largest park in Edina. This provides significant winter recreation opportunities for all residents of Edina that does not focus around skating or hockey, while also creating year-round recreational areas. Winter recreation at Braemar would provide a significant boost to Braemar Golf course by opening its doors to more Edina residents during the winter months for the Tin Fish restaurant, from which Braemar Golf Course receives 15% of gross sales. Skis, snowshoes, snow tubes and potentially fat tire bikes could be rented at the clubhouse. Consulting Team SEH’s Statement of Qualifications and agreement is attached. The team would be led by Paul Pasko. Paul has worked on several projects that involved trail design and snow making, particularly in tight urban environments. Mike Horn would be the project manager. Prior to joining SEH, Mike was the Project Manager for the Winter Recreation Areas at Elm Creek Park Reserve, Clifton E. French Regional Park, Hyland Lake Park Reserve and the Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area. The City of Edina has extensive positive experience working with SEH on a variety of parks and recreation, street and utility projects. The city is currently working with SEH on the driving range and par 3 renovations and also the regulation course renovation projects, specifically on the wetland delineations and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Army Corps of Engineers permitting processes and ecological enhancements. SEH has also added Morton Trails to the team. Founded by two-time Olympian John Morton, Morton Trails provides expert guidance in the planning, design, and construction of sport and recreational trail systems for cross country skiing, walking, running, hiking, biking, snowshoeing, equestrian and other outdoor activities. They work with private landowners, state and local governments, developers, non-profits, and other organizations to create sustainable, economically vibrant, active outdoor communities. RRC Associates out of Boulder Colorado has been added to assist with the operational feasibility study. RRC Associates has particular expertise with parks, recreation, open space, and trails needs assessment studies for cities, counties, recreation districts, and states throughout the US on a variety of outdoor recreation projects. Torrent Engineering and Equipment and HDR Engineering would complete snowmaking engineering and noise impact studies. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Potential Project Timeline: Park Board Review and Comment April 2016 City Council Presentation May 2016 Hire Design and Consulting Team May 2016 Feasibility and Design May - June 2016 City Council Feasibility Study Check In June 7, 2016 Public Open House Late June 2016 Park Board Review July12, 2016 Complete Study July 25, 2016 City Council Presentation/Bid Authorization Aug. 2, 2016 Bid Project August 2016 Bid Award Sept. 20, 2016 Bond Sale December 2016 – January 2017 Construction Winter 2016 – Fall 2017 Open December 2017 Potential Project Funding The winter recreation area at Braemar could be constructed utilizing bonds sold by the city at the same time as the bond sale for the renovation of Braemar Golf Course, the purchase of the 40th & France property and waterslide and toddler play structure improvements at the Aquatic Center. Braemar Golf Course and the Edina Aquatic Center would utilize bonds which we would intend to pay back directly from the revenue generated from the respective facilities. The 2017 tax impact of the additional approximately $3 million would be approximately $360,000 or 1.5% in addition to the 4.9% tax increase estimate included in the 2016-2017 adopted budget. This bond sale would take place in late 2016 to coincide with the beginning of the construction at the golf course. Project Challenges STAFF REPORT Page 4 One challenge in completing this project within this timeframe is that trail design, public input and pro formas will all be completed at the same time. This creates some financial risk for the city in the event that it is decided not to move forward with trail construction since the trails will be designed at the same time that the financial feasibility is being studied. The feasibility study and trail design would be funded from proceeds from the bond sale at the end of the year. If it is determined not to move forward at this time, plans could always be used at a later date, but a funding source for the study would be needed. Another challenge is to keep all winter activities off the playing surfaces of the golf course to eliminate damage caused by winter utilization of a golf course. Park Board Review and Comment – April 2016 Koren Nelson – Member Nelson thinks it’s very exciting. She currently takes her kids to Theo Wirth; however, parking is not ideal or safe. They already love the snowshoeing part of it and think this is a great opportunity. Also, she echoes Chair McCormick. She is not a hockey family and feels everything winter in Edina is hockey so it’s nice to see something that is not just hockey and encourages people to try something different. She indicated she does think it relates to the Strategic Plan; it connects in terms of the community part of it and there is a profitability part. She commented maybe the feasibility study would say it’s a negative but it seems to her this is something they can for sure take a look at because a lot of other communities have done it and been successful. She feels there is enough to pursue more. This would also be a great opportunity for Tin Fish. Matt Dahlien – Member Dahlien thinks this is good use of some other land that we are getting back from the golf course; he thinks it’s good to reclaim some of that land. He is sensitive to other Park Board members who might live within light shot and traffic. Therefore, he thinks a feasibility study of lighting and the disruption of what it might do to the neighborhood is good. He is specifically concerned about the spring when the snow melts; he would hate to see them spend all of this money on the golf course and therefore wouldn’t want this to be something that would preclude even a week from opening the golf course because of drainage issues. He informed the Park Board that some other communities have opened skating paths, where the walking path is groomed for ice skaters. He stated this community is very skating centric and this might be something new and different to try here in the mix of sports. Mike Miller – Member Miller indicated he could see all of this happening every day and has three concerns. The noise would be one of them; also, if you are going to light that tubing hill that’s going to be nasty for all of the neighbors that face that way and to maximize revenue that’s what you are going to do. He could see lighting on the cross country skiing thing because it’s going to be hidden by the trees, but the tubing hill is big and wide open and if there are lights on there that’s going to really be bad for us neighbors. His other concern is traffic; he doesn’t know if anyone has thought about if you are going to see any significant traffic. He knows when he went up to Elm STAFF REPORT Page 5 Creek there were millions of cars and they had an overflow parking lot and you had to take buses from places. It would be a great problem to have revenue wise but it would really be a bad problem for traffic in this area. He added just as a reference point that he can see the golf course sign that flashes Tin Fish Tin Fish Mahi Mahi Monday. He asked if there is a possibility or a thought in doing this study of separating the cross country skiing and tubing and looking at them individually instead of all just in one bucket. He also noted he is concerned if the city would assess the liability risk. Dan Gieseke – Member Gieseke thinks it’s great and is something the city could definitely use. He thinks this would be popular. He is very sensitive to the neighbors and feels they need to be cognizant of their wishes. Brenda McCormick – Chair McCormick agrees with everything that has been said. She thinks it’s great for winter sports and would be able to use areas in Braemar that they haven’t used before and would clean up that hill. She stated the key will be the feasibility study and understand what the noise would be, what the lighting might look like, and also potentially traffic and the hours of operation. Also, she doesn’t feel like we have enough outdoor winter sports in Edina. She is very excited about this opportunity and would encourage Parks & Recreation to continue to look at it because it is a really unique opportunity and a really unique place. She indicated the golf course sub-committee had talked about what they could do with those other holes now that they are going down to 18 holes. They wanted to maximize the space and make it more like a park; more open to non-golfers. This is a great opportunity to at least look at it. She noted that she believes to do a feasibility study it needs to go to the City Council. Julie Strother – Member Strother doesn’t think a lot of people are aware there are snowshoeing and winter activities available in the Braemar area. She thinks it will be busy with these purposes but will also introduce residents to other activities that are available there. Lauren Crist – Student Member Crist thinks it’s exciting and that a lot of young adults and older kids would use the tubing hill if it were open at night with lights. This age group probably wouldn’t use it as much during the day because it wouldn’t be worth dealing with a bunch of little kids during the day. Aanik Lohani – Student Member Lohani thinks it’s a great idea and also likes how it would expand Edina’s ski program to another place so they could practice more. Greg Good – Member Good thinks it’s a great idea and very interesting and at the same time it’s so Edina, it feels over the top. He stated he has this vision of utilizing Braemar with more snowshoeing STAFF REPORT Page 6 and a little more cross country skiing. He noted now they are talking about huge trails, tubing, lights and grooming and that concerns him. Are they trying to plug into an area that truly is residential; it’s right on the border of a residential area. He is also concerned with the overall capital costs it could take to get it up and running. He is also concerned they are going to have another situation where they might have an operating deficit if the tubing doesn’t really offset it. Another concern of his is it doesn’t really fit into the 12 key projects in the Strategic Plan. He is one who would say let’s spend money on something that is in the strategic plan and not just the next great idea that someone came up with. He noted that he likes the idea but he doesn’t see enough yet that tells him we need to go to the City Council and say we really have to do this. One place they could fit it in is around “Developed Community Driving Master Plans for Parks throughout the System”; however, if it’s a true master plan, we actually don’t have anything in our Strategic Plan that says we need to do all four winter sports. He stated he thinks there is a wellness factor in all of our strategies and this is a piece of wellness, that’s where he stands. He added you can always tie something to something but if they truly look at this and say here are the 12 key projects of the Strategic Plan let’s start moving forward, they need to ask themselves if they are comfortable with this because there is always going to be something else to chase and spend money on. Eileen McAwley – Member McAwley thinks it’s a great winter outdoor activity and it will be great for families. She does not think they will have any problems bringing in people and revenue. Staff Request Approve a motion to begin the feasibility study for the financial feasibility and trail design for a snow tubing and cross country skiing operation at Braemar Park. Approve the Agreement with the SEH team to proceed with the financial feasibility study and trail design. EDINA HIGH SCHOOL Activities Department 6754 Valley View Road • Edina, Minnesota • 55439 Phone: 952-848-3817 • Fax: 952-848-3818 May 4, 2016 Ms. Ann Kattreh Director of Parks & Recreation City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ms. Kattreh, Thank you for taking the lead on upgrading our facilities in the City of Edina these past few years. I am encouraged by your desire to improve the winter outdoor activities in Edina as well! Your efforts to expand locations for youth to get outside and enjoy the winter recreational activities are commendable. At the high school level, we have over 200 student-athletes that participate in Nordic Ski at Edina. We have built our Nordic Ski program into team in which students love to compete but still enjoy the outdoors to get a quality personal wellness experience. The addition of snow making at Braemar for cross country ski trails would be an awesome asset to our program. The vision you have for an outdoor winter recreation area at Breamar is exciting for our school. More importantly this project benefits our community as a whole. Thank you so much! Sincerely, Troy M. Stein Troy M. Stein Assistant Principal/Activities Director Edina Public Schools SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT May 11, 2016 RE: City of Edina Winter Recreation Area at Braemar Park SEH No. EDINA136169, 10.00 Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Parks and Recreation Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ann: The City of Edina continues to be the leader in providing its citizens with great amenities. We are excited to have the opportunity to help Edina add its next great amenity, winter recreation at Braemar Park. Thank you for already including us in several meetings with project stakeholders during the past few months. Exhibit 1 enclosed with this Supplemental Letter Agreement shows that that recreation can include activities relying on both machine made snow (snow) and natural snow that will not interfere with future golf course operations. For your convenience, this Supplemental Letter Agreement is divided into sections titled Project Understanding, Approach, Team Description, Fee, and Conclusion. Project Understanding We admire Edina for recognizing the opportunity that reconstructing the 27-hole golf course to 18-holes at Braemar Park presents to considering adding winter recreation featuring snow. Our experience shows that by considering both projects together now Edina is already addressing the fact that golf and snow are mutually exclusive. Many communities that have considered adding recreation that features snow to the wide open spaces of their golf course do not address this fact until it is too late. The price for that tardiness is usually expensive modifications to the golf course. Today golfers want to use a course as late as November and early as March. During November and March snow is usually being made or melting respectively. We understand this mutual exclusivity. Golfers do not want snow to diminish their late or early season golf experience. Besides this mutual exclusivity, we will also help the City understand what kind of impacts snow, noise, and light generated by winter recreation might have on surrounding private property owners. Additionally, and maybe most importantly for some, we will help the City understand the revenues and expenses winter recreation will present. We have already developed these understandings for other winter recreation areas inside other metropolitan areas. It is of great benefit to Edina that Braemar Park already has a large lit blacktop parking lot, clubhouse (containing Tin Fish), and adequate electrical power needed for a former municipal water well (now used for only golf course irrigation) adjacent to the area being considered for winter recreation shown in Exhibit 1. This well can likely become the source of water needed to make snow. At a very schematic level, we believe the area shown in Exhibit 1 can physically contain the following opportunities for winter recreation with snow that all of Edina’s property owners and visitors can use even when natural snow is absent without impacting golf. 1. A lighted cross-country skiing trail featuring snow that is about 2.5 kilometers long (loop). 2. The loop could contain about 30, 20, and 50 percent of beginner, intermediate, and difficult terrain levels respectively. 3. Because the loop can be 2.5 kilometers long, by completing laps of the entire loop common cross- country race distances in multiples of 5 kilometers can be achieved. These distances may be Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016 Page 2 attractive to Edina High School’s Nordic Ski Team. Edina could consider hosting high school Nordic ski races on the loop. A sizable parking lot for cars and buses is already present. Additionally the clubhouse and Tin Fish are probably capable of handling concession needs of potential race athletes, their coaches, and fans. 4. Because the loop could be power groomed, it could periodically host other trail oriented activities such as fat-tire style winter biking and snow shoeing. At the conclusion of these activities, the power-groomer can return the trails to cross country skiing. 5. The loop can connect to possible cross-country skiing trails, featuring natural snow that Edina might locate inside of Braemar’s proposed 18-hole golf course. 6. As many as 11 lighted snow tubing lanes that could include as many as 2 handle style tows that return tubers to the top of the hill for another run. 7. Because the snow tubing area could be power groomed, it could periodically host other downhill activities such as sledding or additional intermediate level cross country skiing trails. At the conclusion of these activities, the power-groomer can return the area to snow tubing. Off-winter usage opportunities for this area will likely present themselves to Edina too. Edina may wish to consider opportunities such as zip wires, mountain biking, walking, running, and scenic overlooks for wedding event nuptial services and photography opportunities for wedding parties already using the clubhouse. Approach We understand the City would likely sell bonds to pay for this amenity. The bond sale would likely take place during late 2016. This timeframe causes us to simultaneously begin work not just on a feasibility study (study), but also the bidding documents themselves. Usually bid document preparation does not begin until the City Council (Council) accepts the study. However, this project’s proposed production schedule below reveals that insufficient time exists to prepare the necessary bidding documents between the Council considering the study and the date the City must open bids from contractors to achieve its October bond sale. Proposed Production Schedule Key Milestones No. Description Date 1 Receive Notice to Proceed May 18, 2016 2 Submit Preliminary Market Analysis/Financial Model Results to the City May 30 3 Park Department Chooses the Final Layout for Snow Tubing Area and Cross-Country Ski Trails (relying on both snow and natural snow) from the Base and Alternate Designs for the Snow Tubing and Cross-Country Ski Trails June 6 to June 10 4 Council Considers the Preliminary Results of the Market Analysis/Financial Model Results and Authorizes Conducting a Neighborhood Meeting on June 30 and Continuing the Preparation of the Study and Bidding Documents June 7 5 Continue the Design of Snow Making System using the Final Layout for the Snow Tubing Area and Cross-Country Ski Trails June 11 6 Send Invitations to Neighborhood Meeting to Affected Nearby Property Owners / Article Appears on the City Web Page and Newspaper Briefly Describing the Project Advertising the Meeting June 16 7 Conduct Neighborhood Meeting at the Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse to Review 90% Complete Study with Stakeholders June 30 8 Submit 90% Complete Study to City for Review by Park Board July 1 9 Park Board Reviews 90% Complete Study July 12 10 Submit Complete Study to the City July 25 Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016 Page 3 Proposed Production Schedule Key Milestones No. Description Date 11 Council Considers the Study and Authorizes Advertisement for Bids August 2 12 Advertise for Bids August 11, 18, and 25 13 Open Bids September 1 14 Council Considers Awarding a Construction Contract to a Contractor September 20 15 City Uses Amount of Construction Contract for Budgeting Purposes October - November 16 Bond Sale to Finance this Project December 2016 / January 2017 17 Contractor Begins Construction Winter 2017 18 Snow Tubing Area and Cross-Country Ski Trails Relying on Snow Open for Business December 2017 1 Notes: 1 Weather dependent. If the weather is too warm leading up to December 2017, snow cannot be made. While we will immediately begin preparing both the study and bidding documents, we must particularly focus on preparing a market analysis/financial model verifying that it makes financial sense to add winter recreation featuring snow and natural snow to Braemar Park that can be used by all citizens of Edina. We will present the preliminary findings to the Council at its June 7 meeting. If the Council believes it makes sense, we will continue to use our wealth of experience to guide us as we prepare the study and bidding documents that will add winter recreation featuring snow and natural snow to Braemar Park within close proximity to private property, the golf course, and public streets shown in Exhibit 1. If it does not make sense to the Council, we will cease the preparation of both the study and bidding documents. To achieve a year end bond sale, it is imperative that the City review and then choose a final layout for the snow tubing area and cross-country ski trails from the base and alternate designs for these features between June 6 and June 10, and no later than June 10, respectively. Otherwise it will be impossible to open bids on September 1. We will hurry to set out in the field no later than June 5 for City use the base and alternate designs for the snow tubing area and cross-country ski trails. In some areas, we will have to set this information out in the field before or after the 27-hole golf course opens or closes respectively. We understand our field activities cannot interfere with golf course operations. Team Description Since 2002 the SEH team that will execute the work plan described by this Supplemental Letter Agreement has successfully added winter recreation featuring snow inside metropolitan area parks in Iowa, Illinois, and Minnesota. Successfully adding snow to winter recreation within close proximity to private property, the golf course, and public streets requires a special blend of winter recreation and municipal project design skills sets not found in the winter recreation design community. It is a lot different designing winter recreation inside Braemar Park than it is in the wide open spaces of the Soldier Hollow or Vail or Sunday River resorts in Utah, Colorado, and Maine respectively. Our team for this project not only has this special blend, but it has also completed many municipal projects for Edina since the mid 1980’s. We understand the Community that is Edina and what it takes to successfully complete projects in Edina. Edina deserves an expert team playing a proactive and pivotal role helping it make great decisions assuring winter recreation at Braemar Park featuring snow is a successful amenity. Our team has not only provided feasibility study, market analysis/financial model preparation, public engagement including project meetings, bid document preparation, permitting, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for winter recreation projects; but also specifically for projects in Edina. Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016 Page 4 Besides strong winter recreation design and market analysis/financial model preparation bench strength, a detailed understanding of how nearby private property owners might view the impacts of winter recreation are a must. Our team not only has the required winter recreation design and market analysis/financial model preparation bench strength, but also a great understanding of how adding winter recreation needing snow in metropolitan areas can impact nearby property owners. As a case in point, I will lead our team as its project manager. Since 1998 and 2002, I have had the pleasure of leading the SEH design teams that completed both our Edina municipal and winter recreation featuring snow projects respectively. As project manager, I will combine my unique knowledge of both winter recreation inside metropolitan areas and what it takes to successfully complete municipal projects for Edina. Besides myself, SEH employees Mike Horn, Ken Taillon, Tom Honer and Deric Deuschle have all not only completed Edina municipal projects, but also our winter recreation projects needing snow. They all understand how property owners near Braemar Park might view the impacts of winter recreation. Below are a few key items about these and some of our team members. 1. Mike Horn – SEH - Quality Assurance / Quality Control: Before joining SEH, Mike was a project manager for Three Rivers Park District. Mike managed all of Three Rivers Park District’s projects either studying or adding winter recreation needing snow to Park District parks. As the Park District’s consulting engineer, Paul worked with Mike on all of those projects. Since joining SEH, and on behalf of Edina, Mike has been inspecting Edina’s contractor’s work reconstructing both the Driving Range and Executive Golf Course in Braemar Park. 2. Noah Brautigam – Morton Trails – Cross Country Ski Trail Design: Morton Trails helped us ‘trail blaze’ the most challenging portions of the cross country ski trails receiving snow that were added to Three Rivers Park District’s Hyland Lake Park Reserve. We worked together to assure that the added trail alignments would be both safe and enjoyable to ski. This time Noah will help us ‘trail blaze’ the most challenging portions of the trails the City might add to Braemar Park. The goal remains assuring a trail design that all of Edina’s property owners and visitors can ski safely and enjoyably. 3. Dave Belin – RRC Associates - Market Analysis / Financial Model Preparation: Prepared an analysis and model for Three Rivers Park District during their study of potential summer time alpine activities at Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area. As our subconsultant, Dave just completed an analysis and model for a proposed winter recreation area in Sioux City, Iowa. 4. Mark Meadows and Mike Parsons – Torrent Engineering and Equipment and HDR Engineering Respectively - Snowmaking Engineering and Noise Impact Study Preparation Respectively: Were both SEH subconsultants on Three Rivers Park District projects to reconstruct the snow making system at Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area and add snowmaking to cross country ski trails in Hyland Lake Park Reserve. Mark was the lead snowmaking engineer for the last two winter Olympic games in Vancouver, Canada and Sochi, Russia. He is currently designing the snowmaking for 2018 Winter Olympics in South Korea. Additionally, since 2002, Mark has been our subconsultant for all our winter recreation area projects needing snow. 5. Ken Taillon and Tom Honer – SEH – Trail Lighting and Electrical Power Distribution Design: Ken and Tom have provided these services for all our winter recreation area projects. Additionally, Ken has designed outdoor lighting for the City on numerous occasions as part of our street and utility reconstruction projects. 6. Toby Muse - SEH – Site Civil Engineering: Besides taking over project manager duties from Paul for the last 6 street and utility reconstruction projects completed by SEH for Edina, Toby is managing Three Rivers Park District’s project to add the 9-Mile Creek Regional Trail to Edina. 7. Deric Deuschle- SEH – Environmental: On behalf of Edina, Deric is providing wetland delineation and environmental permitting services for the project that will reconstruct the 27-hole golf course to and 18-hole golf course at Braemar Park. He provided these same services during the reconstruction of both the Driving Range and Executive Golf Course in Braemar Park. Fee Our experience with similar winter recreational projects reveals these specialty engineering services can cost as much as 21% of the project’s construction cost. Of this 21%, the study and bid document preparation phases alone can cost as much as 5% and 8% respectively. Construction phase services (construction staking, inspection, and administration) usually require the balance of the 21%. Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016 Page 5 A very schematic level consideration of this project reveals its total project cost can be between $2,000,000 and $3,000,000. If we assume a construction cost of $2,500,000 our estimated not-to-exceed fee described by the table below for study and bidding document preparation is 13% of the very schematic level construction budget. This is consistent with our experience for the scope of work required by this particular specialty project. Fee Summary Per Work Item No. Description Estimated Not to Exceed Fee 1 1 Prepare Study $138,131 2 Prepare Bidding Documents and Provide Bidding Assistance $192,146 Subtotal $330,277 3 Provide Construction Phase Services To Be Determined Notes: 1 Includes reimbursable expenses including subconsultant fees. The City will be billed on an hourly basis subject to the not to exceed fee. The hourly billing rates are attached as Exhibit 2. The fees reported in this table are calculated in detail in the attached task hour budget. We will invoice the City monthly on an hourly basis. Our invoices will include expenses. The City may stop work at any time. If the Council chooses to stop work, we will immediately stop work and you will only be billed for work that has been completed. Conclusion This Supplemental Letter Agreement, Exhibit 1, Task Hour Budget, Exhibit 2, and our Agreement dated June 4, 2013 represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project. Our combination of park design professionals, real world snowmaking experience, and market analysis/financial model preparation expertise will ensure that all of the Edina’s immediate and long-term needs are covered. We sincerely appreciate our continued working relationship with the City. Please contact me at 952.912.2611 or ppasko@sehinc.com with questions regarding this Supplemental Letter Agreement. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Paul J. Pasko III, PE Project Manager Enclosures c: Dave Belin, RRC Associates Noah Brautigam, Morton Trail Consultants Mark Meadows, Torrent Engineering and Equipment Mike Parsons, HDR Marty Iozzo, General Corrosion Corporation Toby Muse, SEH Mike Horn, SEH Ken Taillon, SEH Tom Honer, SEH Brent Theroux, SEH Mike Hemstad, SEH Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016 Page 6 p:\ae\e\edina\136169\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\final\05 11 16 final rev\final sla ltr wra at braemar city rev 05 11 16.docx Accepted on this ___day of________________, 2016 City of Edina, Minnesota By:_________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor _________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager WINTER RECREATION AREA RELYING ON NATURAL SNOW WINTER RECREATION AREA RELYING ON MACHINE MADE SNOW PR O J E C T T A S K S Cl i e n t Se r v i c e Ma n a g er Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r St r u c t u r a l En g in e e r St r u c t u r a l En g i n e e r Se n i o r De s i g n e r El e c t r i c a l - Li g h t i n g El e c t r i c a l - Po w e r El e c t r i c a l St a f f En g in e e r Se n i o r Ge o t e c h En g in e e r Na t u r a l Re s o u r c e s Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin Tech 1. 1 S u m m a r y & L o c a t i o n Su m m a r y & L o c a t i o n ( 2 ) Su b t o t a l H o u r s Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t 1. 2 I n i t i a t i o n a n d I s s u e s In i t i a t i o n a n d I s s u e s ( 3 ) Su b t o t a l H o u r s Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t 1. 3 E x i s t i n g C o n d i t i o n s 1. 3 . 1 Pr o p e r t y ( 4 ) 1 42 1. 3 . 2 Ut i l i t i e s ( 5 ) 1 24 1. 3 . 3 Tr a f f i c ( 6 ) 2 1. 3 . 4 Tr a i l s ( 7 ) 42 1. 3 . 5 Wa t e r W e l l a n d P u m p i n g ( 8 ) 4 1. 3 . 6 Li g h t i n g ( 9 ) 4 1. 3 . 7 Op e r a t i o n s ( 1 0 ) 4 1. 3 . 8 Fi n a n c i a l ( 1 1 ) ( 1 2 ) 1. 3 . 9 Ex i s t i n g G o l f C o u r s e I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t Co o r d i n a t i o n ( 1 3 ) 82 1. 3 . 1 0 Re v i e w G e o t e c h n i c a l ( 3 3 ) 42 Su b t o t a l H o u r s 2 4 2 826 8 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $ 2 9 6 $ 6 9 8 $ 2 3 4 $1 , 1 6 0 $ 3 , 7 2 3 $ 8 3 4 $ 6 , 9 4 5 1. 4 P r o p o s e d I m p r o v e m e n t s 1. 4 . 1 Pr o p e r t y ( 1 4 ) 42 4 1. 4 . 2 Ut i l i t i e s ( 1 5 ) 82 4 4 2 4 1. 4 . 3 Tr a i l s ( 1 6 ) ( 1 7 ) 4 412 4 1. 4 . 4 Tu b i n g ( 1 9 ) 4 1. 4 . 5 Wa t e r W e l l a n d P u m p i n g ( 1 8 ) ( 5 8 ) 2 1. 4 . 6 Li g h t i n g ( 2 0 ) 24 2 4 2 1. 4 . 7 No i s e S t u d y ( 2 1 ) ( 2 2 ) 1. 4 . 8 Co r r o s i o n P r o t e c t i o n ( 2 3 ) 1. 4 . 9 Op e r a t i o n s ( 2 4 ) 1. 4 . 1 0 Li f t O p t i o n s a n d R e q u i r e m e n t s 1. 4 . 1 1 Fin a n c i a l ( 2 5 ) 1. 4 . 1 2 Bo o s t e r S t a t i o n P a d a n d F o u n d a t i o n s 61 2 1 2 1. 4 . 1 3 Co o r d i n a t e w i t h P r e f a b B u i l d i n g S u p p l i e r 24 1. 5 P r o j e c t C o s t / S c h e d u l e / Fe a s i bi l i t y 1. 5 . 1 St a t e m e n t o f E s t i m a t e d P r o b a b l e C o s t 1. 5 . 1 . 1 Co n s t r u c t i o n C o s t 4 32 1 2 4 1. 5 . 1 . 2 So f t C o s t ( 2 6 ) 21 8 1. 5 . 2 Pr o j e c t S c h e d u l e 1. 5 . 3 Fe a s i b i l i t y S t a t e m e n t 42 2 1. 5 . 4 A pp e n d i x ( 2 7 ) 2 12 4 1. 5 . 5 Pa d f o r S n o w m a k e r s ( n o f o u n d a t i o n ) 22 1. 5 . 6 Fo u n d a t i o n s f o r H a n d l e - t o w a t T u b i n g H i l l s ( 3 9 ) 81 2 2 0 1. 5 . 7 De t a i l s 81 2 1 6 1. 5 . 8 C o s t E s t i m a t e f o r S t u d y 24 1. 5 . 9 F o o t i n g s f o r L i g h t i n g b e h i n d R e t a i n i n g W a l l s 44 1. 5 . 1 0 Q A Q C 16 6 1 6 2 6 3 0 4 2 4 3 8 4 4 1 2 8 $8 8 7 $ 3 , 3 4 3 $ 4 , 5 3 7 $ 3 , 5 0 5 $ 5 , 7 2 9 $ 7 4 1 $ 6 7 3 $ 1 , 0 6 5 $ 4 , 1 0 6 $ 1 , 7 1 8 $ 8 3 4 $ 2 7 , 1 3 9 1. 6 T r a i l A l i g n m e n t ( 2 8 ) 1. 6 . 1 Fi e l d M a r k T r a i l A l i g n m e n t O p t i o n s ( 1 6 ) 2 4 2 2 8 1 2 8 2 4 1 2 1 2 2 Ta s k H o u r B u d g e t Wi n t e r R e c r e a t i o n A r e a a t B r a e m a r P a r k Ci t y o f E d i n a Ma y 1 1 , 2 0 1 6 ESTIMATED COST ES T I M A T E D H O U R S 1. 0 F e a s i bi l i t y S t u d y ( 1 ) Pa g e 1 o f 5 PR O J E C T T A S K S Cl i e n t Se r v i c e Ma n a g er Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r St r u c t u r a l En g in e e r St r u c t u r a l En g i n e e r Se n i o r De s i g n e r El e c t r i c a l - Li g h t i n g El e c t r i c a l - Po w e r El e c t r i c a l St a f f En g in e e r Se n i o r Ge o t e c h En g in e e r Na t u r a l Re s o u r c e s Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST ES T I M A T E D H O U R S 1. 6 . 2 Sc h e d u l e F i e l d R e v i e w 2 1. 6 . 3 Fie l d R e v i e w 8 1. 6 . 4 Fin a l A l i g n m e n t D e c i s i o n a n d A p p r o v a l ( 6 9 ) 82 24 2 2 8 1 21 63 61 2 1 2 2 $2 9 6 $ 8 3 6 $ 3 4 9 $ 2 3 4 $1 , 4 8 2 $1,120 $ 2 , 1 1 2 $ 5 , 1 5 5 $ 1 , 2 4 8 $ 1 , 1 1 4 $ 2 0 9 $ 1 4 , 1 5 4 1. 7 Pu b l i c I n v o l v e m e n t ( 7 0 ) 1. 7 . 1 Pu b l i c R e v i e w 4 20 1. 7 . 2 Co u n c i l R e v i e w a n d A p p r o v a l 4 42 1. 7 . 3 Su b C o n s u l t a n t A t t e n d a n c e ( 7 1 ) Su b t o t a l H o u r s 8 422 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $1 , 6 7 2 $528 $ 3 , 1 5 1 $5,350 2. 1 Da t a C o l l e c t i o n 2. 1 . 1 A rc h i t e c t u r e ( 2 9 ) ( 3 0 ) 2. 1 . 2 Civ i l ( 3 1 ) 81 6 24 2 0 2. 1 . 3 To p o g r a p h i c S u r v e y ( 3 2 ) ( 6 3 ) 856 5 6 2. 1 . 4 Ge o t e c h n i c a l ( 3 3 ) ( 65 ) ( 6 6 ) ( 6 7 ) ( 6 8 ) 80 2. 1 . 5 El e c t r i c a l - P o w e r ( 3 4 ) 24 2. 1 . 6 El e c t r i c a l - L i g h t i n g ( 3 5 ) 44 2. 1 . 7 Me c h a n i c a l ( 3 6 ) 2. 1 . 8 Co r r o s i o n P r o t e c t i o n S t u d y ( 3 7 ) 2 2. 1 . 9 St r u c t u r a l ( 3 8 ) 2. 1 . 1 0 No i s e S t u d y ( 4 0 ) Su b t o t a l H o u r s 8 1 6 4 2 8 8 2 2 4 2 8 5 6 5 6 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $ 1 , 1 8 2 $ 3 , 3 4 3 $ 7 4 1 $ 4 4 8 $ 1 , 0 6 5 $ 1 2 , 7 7 0 $ 2 , 2 4 0 $ 4 , 0 1 0 $ 5 , 8 2 3 $ 5 , 1 9 8 $ 3 6 , 8 2 0 2. 2 Pl a n S h e e t s 2. 2 . 1 Tit l e S h e e t S i g n a t u r e s 2. 2 . 2 Si t e P l a n P u m p H o u s e A r e a ( 4 1 ) 12 2. 2 . 3 Civ i l ( 4 2 ) ( 4 3 ) ( 4 4 ) ( 4 5 ) ( 4 6 ) ( 6 4 ) 41 2 20 1 4 0 1 2 2. 2 . 4 Si t e & G r a d i n g ( 4 7 ) 40 2 4 2. 2 . 5 Er o s i o n C o n t r o l P l a n ( 4 8 ) 88 2. 2 . 6 El e c t r i c a l - P o w e r ( 4 9 ) 82 0 2. 2 . 7 Co r r o s i o n P r o t e c t i o n ( 5 0 ) 2. 2 . 8 El e c t r i c a l - L i g h t i n g ( 5 1 ) 24 2 2 0 2 2. 2 . 9 Me c h a n i c a l ( 5 2 ) ( 5 9 ) 2. 2 . 1 0 St r u c t u r a l ( 5 3 ) 24 4 2. 2 . 1 1 Re t a i n i n g W a l l ( 6 4 ) 86 4 8 1 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s 4 1 2 1 0 6 8 2 4 1 0 4 0 3 4 8 1 8 8 6 0 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $ 5 9 1 $ 2 , 5 0 7 $ 1 , 7 4 5 $ 7 0 1 $ 1 , 0 9 1 $ 4 , 4 4 7 $ 2 , 2 4 2 $ 5 , 3 2 7 $ 5 , 2 9 5 $ 1 , 1 6 0 $ 1 7 , 5 4 6 $ 8 , 5 9 2 $ 5 1 , 2 4 4 2. 3 Me e t i n g s Me e t i n g s ( 5 4 ) 33 3 Su b t o t a l H o u r s 33 3 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $5 5 6 $ 6 7 3 $ 3 9 9 $1,628 2. 4 Pr o j e c t M a n u a l 2. 3 . 1 Fr o n t E n d S e c t i o n s ( 5 5 ) 2 12 4 2. 3 . 2 Bi d d i n g R e q u i r e m e n t s ( 5 6 ) 2 12 2 2. 3 . 3 Sp e c i f i c a t i o n s ( C i t y o f E d i n a ) 28 1 0 84 2. 3 . 4 Sp e c i a l P r o v i s i o n ( 6 4 ) 88 24 1 2 2. 3 . 5 Pu m p S k i d ( 5 9 ) 8 2. 3 . 6 A pp e n d i x ( 5 7 ) 2 24 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s 1 6 8 8 1 8 80 2 4 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $ 2 , 3 6 4 $ 1 , 3 9 6 $ 1 , 4 8 2 $ 4 , 0 3 6 $ 1 1 , 4 5 6 $ 2 , 5 0 3 $ 2 3 , 2 3 8 2. 5 Op i n i o n o f P r o b a b l e C o s t 2. 4 . 1 Co s t E s t i m a t e 2 4 2 1 8 4 3 2 1 6 2 Su b t o t a l H o u r s 2 4 2 1 8 4 3 2 1 6 2 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $ 2 9 6 $ 8 3 6 $ 3 7 1 $ 2 2 4 $ 1 , 0 6 5 $ 6 2 3 $ 2 , 9 8 7 $ 2 , 2 9 1 $ 2 0 9 $ 8 , 9 0 1 2. 0 B i d D o c u m e n t P r e p a r a t i o n Pa g e 2 o f 5 PR O J E C T T A S K S Cl i e n t Se r v i c e Ma n a g er Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r St r u c t u r a l En g in e e r St r u c t u r a l En g i n e e r Se n i o r De s i g n e r El e c t r i c a l - Li g h t i n g El e c t r i c a l - Po w e r El e c t r i c a l St a f f En g in e e r Se n i o r Ge o t e c h En g in e e r Na t u r a l Re s o u r c e s Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST ES T I M A T E D H O U R S 3. 1 Bi d d i n g A s s i s t a n c e 3. 1 . 1 A d f o r B i d s 3. 1 . 1 . 1 No t i c e o f H e a r i n g a n d L e t t i n g 2 3. 1 . 1 . 2 No t i c e t o B i d d e r s 2 3. 1 . 1 . 3 El e c t r o n i c P l a n R o o m C o o r d i n a t i o n 2 3. 1 . 2 Ag en c y R e v i e w 3. 1 . 2 . 1 Wa t e r s h e d P e r m i t t i n g 2 3. 1 . 3 Re s p on s e t o B i d d e r s 3. 1 . 3 . 1 Si t e C i v i l 88 3. 1 . 3 . 2 El e c t r i c a l D i s t r i b u t i o n 24 3. 1 . 3 . 3 Li g ht i n g 84 3. 1 . 3 . 4 Me c h a n i c a l (59 ) 3. 1 . 3 . 5 Dis t r i b u t i o n P i p in g (59 ) 3. 1 . 3 . 6 Pu m p H o u s e 3. 1 . 4 St r u c t u r a l 2 3. 1 . 5 A dd e n d u m s 8 3. 1 . 6 Bi d O p en i n g 3. 1 . 5 . 1 Pr e p ar e T a b u l a t i o n o f B i d s 4 3. 1 . 5 . 2 Pr e p ar e R e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f C o n t r a c t A w a r d 2 3. 2 QA Q C 1 2 2 4 Su b t o t a l H o u r s 1 2 2 4 8 2 8 1 0 2 1 6 1 2 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $ 1 , 7 7 3 $ 5 , 0 1 5 $ 1 , 4 8 2 $ 4 4 8 $ 1 , 0 6 5 $ 1 , 5 5 7 $ 2 9 0 $ 1 , 4 9 3 $ 1 , 2 5 2 $ 1 4 , 3 7 6 Cl i e n t Se r v i c e Ma n a g er Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r St r u c t u r a l En g in e e r St r u c t u r a l En g i n e e r Se n i o r De s i g n e r El e c t r i c a l - Li g h t i n g El e c t r i c a l - Po w e r El e c t r i c a l St a f f En g in e e r Se n i o r Ge o t e c h En g in e e r Na t u r a l Re s o u r c e s Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST Su b t o t a l H o u r s 14 2 8 4 0 5 0 5 4 3 6 1 3 5 6 8 6 8 2 0 1 1 8 1 2 1 2 3 0 559 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $2 , 0 6 9 $ 5 , 8 5 1 $ 6 , 9 8 0 $ 5 , 8 4 1 $ 7 , 3 6 6 $ 6 , 6 7 0 $ 2 , 9 1 5 $ 7 , 4 5 7 $ 1 , 1 6 0 $ 6 , 3 4 6 $ 2 , 6 4 0 $ 1 6 , 8 9 8 $ 1 , 2 4 8 $ 1 , 1 1 4 $ 3 , 1 2 9 $77,694.00 Su b t o t a l E x p en s e s $1,685.00 RR C A s s o c i a t e s (62 ) $19,332.00 To r r e n t E n g in e e r i n g (58 ) (61 ) $9,720.00 HD R $16,200.00 Ge n e r a l C o r r o s i o n $2,700.00 Mo r t o n T r a i l s $10,800.00 Su b t o t a l $138,131.00 Su b t o t a l H o u r s 30 3 2 1 8 6 8 4 1 3 4 5 9 1 2 0 8 2 4 4 1 8 4 5 6 5 6 2 6 922 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $4 , 4 3 3 $ 6 , 6 8 6 $ 3 , 1 4 1 $ 7 0 1 $ 1 , 0 9 1 $ 7 , 5 9 7 $ 7 , 6 2 3 $ 7 , 8 5 7 $ 1 8 , 6 8 7 $ 1 , 1 6 0 $ 2 2 , 7 7 2 $ 2 6 , 3 5 0 $ 5 , 8 2 3 $ 5 , 1 9 8 $ 2 , 7 1 2 121,831.00 Su b t o t a l E x p en s e s $500.00 So i l B o r i n g s B r a u n I n t e r t e c $14,040.00 HD R $4,320.00 To r r e n t E n g in e e r i n g (59 ) $23,760.00 Mo r t o n T r a i l s $8,800.00 Su b t o t a l $173,251.00 Su b t o t a l H o u r s 12 2 4 8 2 8 1 0 2 1 6 1 2 94 Su b t o t a l L a b o r C o s t $1 , 7 7 3 $ 5 , 0 1 5 $ 1 , 4 8 2 $ 4 4 8 $ 1 , 0 6 5 $ 1 , 5 5 7 $ 2 9 0 $ 1 , 4 9 3 $ 1 , 2 5 2 $14,375.00 Su b t o t a l E x p en s e s $200.00 To r r e n t E n g in e e r i n g (60 ) $4,320.00 Su b t o t a l $18,895.00 $330,277.00 3. 0 B i d d i n g A s s i s t a n c e TO T A L C O S T A S S O C I A T E D W I T H T H I S P R O P O S A L : PR O J E C T C O S T S U M M A R Y 3. 0 B i d d i n g A s s i s t a n c e 1. 0 F e a s i bi l i t y S t u d y ( 1 ) 2. 0 B i d D o c u m e n t P r e p a r a t i o n Pa g e 3 o f 5 PR O J E C T T A S K S Cl i e n t Se r v i c e Ma n a g er Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r St r u c t u r a l En g in e e r St r u c t u r a l En g i n e e r Se n i o r De s i g n e r El e c t r i c a l - Li g h t i n g El e c t r i c a l - Po w e r El e c t r i c a l St a f f En g in e e r Se n i o r Ge o t e c h En g in e e r Na t u r a l Re s o u r c e s Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST ES T I M A T E D H O U R S P: \ A E \ E \ E d i n a \ 1 3 6 1 6 9 \ 1 - g e n l \ 1 0 - s e t up - c o n t \ 0 3 - p r o p o s a l \ [ 0 5 0 6 1 6 B r m r T H B - . x l s x ] H o u r s - C o s t s (1 ) (2 ) (3 ) (4 ) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) (8 ) (9 ) (10 ) (11 ) (1 2 ) (13 ) (14 ) (15 ) (16 ) (17 ) (18 ) (1 9 ) (2 0 ) (21 ) (2 2 ) (23 ) (24 ) (25 ) (26 ) (27 ) (28 ) (29 ) (30 ) (31 ) (3 2 ) (33 ) (3 4 ) (35 ) (36 ) (37 ) (38 ) (39 ) (40 ) (41 ) (42 ) (43 ) (44 ) (45 ) (46 ) (47 ) (48 ) (49 ) (50 ) (51 ) (52 ) (53 ) (54 ) (55 ) (56 ) (5 7 ) (5 8 ) (5 9 ) (6 0 ) Fo r i t e m s i n 1 . 0 a n d 2 . 0 a b o v e . Ap p e n d i x t o i n c l u d e C i t y o f E d i n a s t a n d a r d p l a t e s , P e r m i t s , s o i l b o r i n g s Fe a s i b i l i t y Fe a s i b i l i t y I t e m s a s a p p l i c a b l e t o T o r r en t e x p e r t i s e a n d t h e s n o w m a k i n g s y s t e m In c l u d e s s y s t e m c a p a c i t y & s n o w m a k i n g e q u i p m en t r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s , p u m p s t a t i o n m e c h a n i c a l & e l e c t r i c a l d e s i g n a s r e l a t e d t o t h e pr o c e s s e q u i p m e n t , a n d t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n p i p i n g s y s t e m Po w e r r e q u i r e m e n t s Wa t e r t e m p e r a t u r e i m p a c t a n d c o o l i n g o p t i o n s Bi d D o c s P r e p In c l u d e s p u m p s t a t i o n a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n p i p i n g s y s t em m e c h a n i c a l d e s i g n , p l a n s h e e t s , b i d d o c s Bi d d i n g A s s i s t a n c e , f o r i t e m s p u m p s t a t i o n a n d d i s t r i b u t i o n p i p i n g s y s t e m Lif t l o c a t i o n i d e n t i f i e d i f i n c l u d e d i n t h e p r o j e c t . Ge n e r a l C o r r o s i o n t o s t u d y e x i s t i n g s o i l c o n d i t i o n s f o r c o n d u c t i v i t y . To i n c l u d e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s f o r s t a f f i n g a n d e q u i p m e n t a d d i t i o n r e q u i r e f o r S n o w m a k i n g a n d G r o m i n g O p e r a t i o n s Ci v i l t o i n c l u d e b a s e m a p p i n g , a e r i a l im a g i n g , t o p o g r a p h i c m a p p i n g a n d s i t e p h o t o s Su r v e y t o i n c l u d e : 1 . G o p h e r S t a t e O n e C a l l f o r d e s i g n l o c a t e , 2 . T o p o i n k e y a r e a s , 3 . S i g n i f i c a n t t r e e l o c a t i o n s , 4 . F i e l d s t ak i n g o f p r e l i m i n a r y a l i g n m e n t , 5 . S o i l B o r i n g l o c a t i o n s In c l u d e s s o i l b o r i n g i n v e s t i g a t i o n ( u p t o 14 b o r i n g s ) , g e o t e c h n i c a l e v a l u a t i o n , a n d t e ch n i c a l m e m o r a n d u m s u m m a r i z i n g i n v e s t i g a t io n , e v a l u a t i o n a n d r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . Id e n t i f y s t u d y a r e a a n d s e t u p d a t a c o l l e c t i o n i n f i e l d Ba s i c i n f o r m a t i o n t o i n c l u d e s u m m a r y a n d a d d r e s s To i n c l u d e e x i s t i n g l o c a t i o n o f t r a i l s a n d t h e i r u s e . Ge n e r a l C o r r o s i o n r e p o r t o n e x i s t i n g s o i l c o n d u c t i v i t y . St r u c t u r a l s u r v e y o f e x i s t i n g p u m p h o u s e s t r u c t u r e . Th e f o r m a t w i l l f o l l o w e s t a b l i s h e d C i t y o f E d i n a f o r m a t f o r F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y . 1. T o i n c l u d e e x i s t i n g p a r k u s e , b o u n d a r i e s a n d bu f f e r s , 2 . P r o j e c t L i m i t s , 3 . P r o j e c t ar e a w i t h r e l a t i o n s h i p w i t h C l u b H o u s e a nd P a r k i n g . RR C A s s o c i a t e s w i l l h i r e d a s a s u b - c o n s u l t a n t t o S E H t o c o m p l e t e t h i s w o r k Ci t y t o d i r e c t l y c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h g o l f c o u r s e a r c h i t e c t i f a n y c h a n g e a r e n e e d e d d u e t o W R A To i n c l u d e e x i s t i n g C I P o r e x i s t i n g p l a n i n fo r m a t i o n a n d p r o c e s s f o r p u b l i c m e e t i n g . To i n c l u d e e x i s t i n g l i g h t i n g i n t h e p r o j e c t a r e a , p a r k i n g a r e a a n d E x t e r i o r C l u b H o u s e Ci t y s t a f f t o p r o v i d e l i s t o f e x i s t i n g s t a f f i n g l e v e l s a n d e x i s t i n g e q u i p m e n t t h a t w i l l b e u t i l i z e d f o r S n o w m a k i n g Ci t y t o p r o v i d e e x i s t i n g e x pe n s e s a n d r e v e n u e s f o r s t u d y . Bi d d i n g R e q u i r e m e n t s ; B i d F o r m , I n s t r u c t i on s T o B i d d e r s , A d v e r t i s e m e n t f o r B i d s El e c t r i c a l - L i g h t i n g P l a n t o i n c l u d e s i t e , t r a i l , p u m p h o u s e , s e r v i c e c a b i n e t , t r a n s f o r m e r d e t a i l s . Me c h a n i c a l t o i n c l u d e f o r c e m a i n , p u m p h o u s e p l a n , s n o w m a k i n g eq u i p m e n t p r e - o r d e r . St r u c t u r a l t o i n c l u d e m o d i f i c a t i o n s t o e x i s t i n g p u m p h o u s e a n d n e w p u m p h o u s e , R e t a i n i n g w a l l d e s i g n a n d r e v i e w , l i f t i f r e q u i r ed . Me e t i n g w i t h C i t y s t a f f r e v i e w t o i n c l u d e ; 1 . O n e r e v i e w a t 5 0 % b i d d o c u m e n t s , O n e a t 9 0 % b i d d o c u m e n t s , U p t o o n e a d d i t i o n a l . Fr o n t E n d : T i t l e S h e e t , C e r t i f i c a t i o n S h e e t , T a b l e o f C o n t e n t s Si t e G r a d i n g ; P u m p h o u s e s i t e a n d g r a d i n g p l a n , g e n e r a l g r a d i n g p l an , r e t a i n i n g w a l l l o c a t i o n s , T u r f e s t a b l i s h m e n t , p r u n i n g d e t ai l s Ci v i l ; R e m o v a l s , C l e a r i n g a n d G r u b b i n g , T r e e R e m o v a l Pl a n , C o n s t r u c t i o n s t a g i n g a r e a , a n d A c c e s s r o u t e p l a n To i n c l u d e f i n a l t r a i l a l i g n m e n t , t o b e s t a k e d a n d a p p r o v e d b y c i t y . Tu b i n g a r e a t o b e l i m i t e d t o n o t e s 2 8 a n d 2 9 o n E x h i b i t A . Pe d e s t r i a n / G o l f e r C o n t r o l P l a n i f C o n s t r u t i o n S c h e d u l e i s d u r i n g g o l f s e a s o n . A d e t a i l o f c a t h o d i c p r o t e c t i o n w i l l b e d e v e l o p e d i f r e c o m m e n d e d b y G e n e r a l C o r r o s i o n Er o s i o n C o n t r o l P l a n t o i n c l u d e c o o r d i n a t i o n w i t h W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t , p e r m i t t i n g , a n d d e v e l o p m e n t o f S t o r m w a t e r P o l l u t i o n P r e v e nt i o n P l a n ( S W P P P ) . El e c t r i c a l - P o w e r t o i n c l u d e m a i n p o w e r n e e d s , c o o r d i n a t i o n wi t h e x c e l , p u m p s k i d p o w e r n e e d s , p o w e r p l a n f o r p u m p i n g , p o w e r di s t r i b u t i o n f o r s n o w m a k i n g . No p e d e s t r i a n o r v e h i c l e t r a f f i c pl a n i s i n c l u d e d i n t h i s p r o p o s a l Ex i s t i n g p u m p h o u s e m o d i f i c a t i o n ( i f ne e d e d ) a n d n e w p u m p h o u s e p l a n s , f e n c i n g , l a n d s c a p i n g , e q u i p m e n t s t o r a g e a r e a . Re v i e w e x i s t i n g e l e c t r i c a l i n f r a s t r u c t u r e , e x i s t i n g p u b l i c a n d p r i v a t e u t i l i t i e s , c o o r di n a t i o n a n d m e e t i n g w i t h X c e l E n e r g y , c o or d i n a t i o n w i t h p r i m a r y d i s t r i b u t i o n , lo c a t i o n o f 3 - p h a s e p o w e r s o u r c e . Re v i e w e x i s t i n g l i g h t c o d e f o r c i t y , h o u r s o f o p e r a t i o n s an d l i g h t i n g i m p a c t s , p r o v i d e a g r a p h i c o f l i g h t s p i l l a r e a . SE H t o p r o v i d e a d d i t i o n a l L I D A R i n f o r m a t i o n i f n e e d e d t o H D R g r a p h i c In c l u d e s ; 1 . p r o j e c t l i m i t s a n d , 2 . c o n n e c t i on s t o e x i s t i n g C l u b H o u s e a n d P a r k i n g A r e a To i n c l u d e ; 1 . a n y r e q u i r e d u p g r a d e s t o p u b l i c o r p r i v a t e u t i l i t i e s , 2 . e s t i m a t e d a d d i t i o n a l p o w e r u s e , 3 . c h a n g e s t o e x i s t i n g ir r i g a t i o n s y s t e m . Ci t y t o p r o v i d e c o p y o f e x i s t i n g pe r m i t s t a t u s , p e r m i t q u a n t i t i e s a l l o w e d , q u a n t i t i e s u s e d a n d w a t e r t e m p e r a t u r e . As s u m e s e x i s t i n g p e d e s t r i a n a n d v e h i c l e t r a f f i c p a t t e r n s w i l l n o t be i m p a c t ed , t h u s t h e r e i s n o a d d i t i o n a l t r a f f i c s t u d y e f f o r t i n c l u d e d i n t h i s p r o p o s a l . 1 . T o i n c l u d e k n o w n p u b l i c u t i l i t i e s a n d l o c a t i o n s , 2 . E x i s t i n g a v a i l a b l e p o w e r , a n d u s e , 3 . P r iv a t e u t i l i t i e s l o c a t i o n s a n d u se , 4 . E x i s t i n g I r r i g a t i o n S y s t e m a s b u i l t s p r o v i d e d b y C i t y . Su r v e y o f e x i s t i n g p u m p i n g e q u i p m e n t Ci t y t o p r o v i d e a s - b u ilt o f e x i s t i n g p u m p h o u s e RR C A s s o c i a t e s w i l l p r o v i d e p r oj e c t e d e x p e n s e s a n d r e v e n u e s . To i n c l u d e d e s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t i n g e n c ie s , c o n s u l t a n t f e e s , e q u i p m e n t c o s t s . To i n c l u d e ; 1 . P u b l i c m e e t i n g i n f o r m a t i o n , 2 . U t i l i t y I n f o r m a t io n , 3 . E x i s t i n g S i t e P l a n , 4 . N e w G o l f C o u r s e P l a n , 5 . Tr a i l A l i g n m e n t D e s g i n D e c i s i o n t o b e m a d e b y S E H , M o r t o n T r a i l s a n d C i t y S t a f f . To i n c l u d e ; 1 . t r a i l l i g h t i n g n e e d s , 2 . P h o t o m e t r i c g r a p h i c , 3 . a n y r e c o m m e n d e d c h a n g e s t o e x i s t i ng c o u r s e o r e x t e r i o r c l u b h o u se l i g h t i n g , 4 . a n y r e c o m m e n d e d c h a n g e s t o p a r k i n g l o t l i g h t i n g . Tu b i n g a r e a s t u d y t o b e l i m i t e d t o n o t e s 2 8 a n d 2 9 o n E x h i b i t A . Sc o p e - N o A r c h i t e c t u r e w o r k i n c l u d e d . P u m p H o u s e A r c h i t e c t u r e p r o v i d e d b y T o r r e n t . SE H w i l l f i e l d m a r k a p r i m a r y a l i g n m e n t i n t h e A r e a A w i t h u p t o t w o a l t e r m a t i v e s i n t h e a s e n t a r e a a n d t h e s o u t h a r e a a s n o t e d o n t h e E x h i b i t O n e , a n d a p r i m a r y a l i g n m e n t i n A r e a B w i t h c h a n g e s u p t o 2 5 % o f t h e t o t a l l e n g t h o f t h e p r i m a r y a l i g n m e n t a s n o t e d o n E x h i b i t O n e . HD R t o p r o v i d e r e s u l t s o f n o i s e d a t a i n c l u d i n g a g r ap h i c r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e l e v e l o f n o i s e s p i l l l e v e l s . Tr a i l a l i g n m e n t s o u t s i d e o f t h e p r o j e c t a r e a f o r n o n - s n o w m a kin g t r a i l s w i l l b e t h e r e s p o n s i b i l t i y o f t h e C i t y . To r r e n t t o p r o v i d e ; 1 . a d d i t i o n a l p o w e r r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d p u m p i n g n e e d s , 2 . I m p a c t s t o p e r mi t , 3 . W a t e r t e m p e r a t u r e i m p a c t s t o s no w m a k i n g a n d p o s s i b l e s o l u t i o n s / c o s t s , 4 . s n o w m a k i n g d i s t r i b u t i o n l a y o u t , 5 . R a d o n i n w a t e r , w e w i l l n e e d h e l p / i n p u t f r o m S E H o n t h i s . Pa g e 4 o f 5 PR O J E C T T A S K S Cl i e n t Se r v i c e Ma n a g er Pr o j e c t Ma n a g e r Se n i o r St r u c t u r a l En g in e e r St r u c t u r a l En g i n e e r Se n i o r De s i g n e r El e c t r i c a l - Li g h t i n g El e c t r i c a l - Po w e r El e c t r i c a l St a f f En g in e e r Se n i o r Ge o t e c h En g in e e r Na t u r a l Re s o u r c e s Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST ES T I M A T E D H O U R S (6 1 ) (6 2 ) (6 3 ) (6 4 ) (6 5 ) (6 6 ) (6 7 ) (6 8 ) (69 ) (7 0 ) (71 ) In c l u d e s c o s t f o r 1 s i t e v i s i t . Fi n a n c i a l A n a l y s i s , i n c l u d i n g s i z e / d e p t h o f m a r k e t , c o m p e t i t iv e a n a l y s i s , a n d f i n a n c i a l m o d e l i ng ( t i c k e t a n o t h e r r e v e n e u e s , o p er a t i n g e x p e n s e s ) . F o r N o r d i c o n l y = $ 9 , 4 0 0 , f o r N o r d i c a n d T u b i ng = $ 1 2 , 9 0 0 . T h i s a l s o i n c l u d e s a t r i p t o M N f o r a m e e t i n g . As s u m e s g e o t e c h n i c a l e v a l u a t i o n c o n s i d e r s ; up t o 2 m o d u l a r b l o c k r e t a i n i n g w a l l s , b o o s t e r s t a t i o n f o u n d a t i o n , l i g h t p o l e f o u n d a ti o n s , t o w m a c h i n e r y f o u n d a t i o n s , p i pe s u b g r a d e / b e d d i n g , g e n e r a l e a r t h w o r k . As s u m e s t h e P a r k D i s t r i c t w i l l r e p a i r d a m a g e t o t h e g o l f co u r s e r e s u l t i n g f r o m t h e s o i l b o r i n g i n v e s t i g a t i o n . Th e P a r k D i s t r i c t u n d e r s t a n d s t h a t n o i s e l e v e l s w i l l b e h i g h e r a t t h e g o l f c o u r s e o n t h e d a y s w e a r e p e r f o r m i n g t h e s o i l b o r i n g in v e s t i g a t i o n . T h e P a r k D i s t r i c t w i l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r co m m u n i c a t i n g t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r d i s r u p t i v e n o i s e l e v e l s a n d v e h i c l e activity to golf course users. Fi n a l A l i g n m e n t t o b e d e c i d e d u p o n t h e c o n c l u s i o n o f t h e f i e l d v i si t a n d g r a p h i c a l l y r e p r e s e n t e d f o r a s i g n - o f f f r o m C i t y s t a f f t o m o v e f o r w a r d w i t h t h e S E H t e a m t o s t a r t p i p i n g , e l e c t r i c a l , g r a d i n g p l a n s . Su b C o n s u l t a n t a t t e n d a c e f o r o n e p u b l i c m e e t i n g a n d o n e a d d i t i o n a l m e e t i n g i f n e e d e d f o r T o r r e n t , R R C , H D R , a n d M o r t o n T r a i l s In c l u d e s s i g n e d p l a n s h e e t s a n d s p e c i a l p r o v i s i o n s f o r u p t o 2 m o d u l a r b l o c k r e t a i n i n g w a l l s . Di v i d e s i t e i n t o 5 a r e a s o f c on c e r n . A l l s u r v e y w o r k w i l l ne e d t o b e d o n e u s i n g t h e T o t a l S t a t i o n w i t h a 2 m a n o p e r a t i o n . E s t i m at e d 2 6 c o n t r o l P o i n t s , b u t m o s t l i k e l y w i l l n e e d m o r e i n d e n s e a r e a s . A s s u m i n g b o r i n g s , c e n t e r line alignment stakes and topo c an be done with each trip. Additional time will be ad d e d d e p e n d i n g o n w h a t ' s n e e d e d f o r s p e c i f i c t r e e s w i t h i n t h e c o r r i do r . A c e n t e r l i n e s h o t , 1 5 f t a n d 3 0 f t l e f t a n d r i g h t f o r 60 f t c o r r i d o r f o r t o p o l i m i t s . I n c l u d e s a n y s i g n i f i c a n t g r a d e b r ea k s i n s i d e t h a t c o r r i d o r . S u r v e y o r s w i l l b e p r o v i d e d w i t h a D XF map showing the corridor li mits and centerline alignment fo r s t a k i n g . S u r v e y o r s w i l l a l s o b e p r o v i d e d w i t h a . c s v f i l e f o r s t a k i n g b o r i n g s . SE H t o a t t e n d u p t o : 1 . O n e P a r k C o m m i s s i o n M e e t i n g , 2 : O n e C i t y C o u n c i l M e e t i n g , 3 . T w o o n - s i t e s t a f f m e e t i n g s , 4 C i t y t o r e s e rv e a n d h o l d m e e t i n g s a t B r a e m a r Cl u b H o u s e , 5 . C i t y t o s e n d o u t i n v i t a t i o n s to public meetings, distribute, collect and publis h public comments. So i l b o r i n g i n v e s t i g a t i o n w i l l b e p e r f o r m e d b y B r a u n I n t e r t e c us i n g a r u b b e r t r a c k e d g e o p r o b e r i g. A s s u m e s p r o p o s e d b o r i n g l o c a ti o n s w i l l b e a c c e s s i b l e t o B r a u n , S E H s t a f f , a n d u t i l i t y l o c a t o r s . B r a u n d r i l l c r e w w i l l a t t e m p t t o m i n i m i z e a n y r u t t i n g o r o t h e r d a m a g e t o l a n d s c a p i n g a n d l a w n s ; h o w e v e r , B r a u n an d S E H w i l l n o t b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r r e p a i r s ne e d e d a s a r e s u l t o f d r i l l i n g o p e r a t i o n s . Pa g e 5 o f 5 Exhibit 2 SEH Hourly Billable Rates – Winter Recreation Area at Braemar Park Classification - Office Staff Billable Rate Client Service Manager $147.76 Project Manager $208.95 Senior Structural Engineer $174.51 Structural Engineer $116.83 Senior Designer $136.40 Electrical Engineer - Lighting $185.28 Electrical Engineer - Power $224.22 Electrical Staff Engineer $133.16 Senior Geotech Engineer $155.73 Natural Resources Scientist $145.05 Project Engineer $93.33 Project GIS Analyst $131.99 Landscape Architect $143.21 Administrative Technician $104.31 Classification – Field Staff Billable Rate Survey Crew Chief $103.97 Survey Instrument Operator $92.83 Page 1 Statement of Qualifications Winter Recreation at Braemar Park City of Edina, Minnesota | April 1, 2016 Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax RE: Winter Recreation at Braemar Park City of Edina, Minnesota Statement of Qualifications (Qualification) SEH No. P-EDINA 136169 April 1, 2016 Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Parks and Recreation Department 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ann: The City of Edina continues to be the leader in providing its citizens with great amenities. The opportunity to help Edina add its next great amenity, winter recreation at Braemar Park featuring machine made snow (snow), excites us. Since 2002 the SEH team described by this Qualification has successfully added winter recreation featuring snow inside metropolitan areas parks in Iowa, Illinois, and Minnesota. Our approach in Braemar Park is to first prepare a market analysis/financial model verifying that it makes financial sense to add winter recreation featuring snow to Braemar Park that can be used by all citizens of Edina. If it makes sense, we will use our wealth of experience to guide us as we add winter recreation featuring snow to Braemar Park within close proximity to private property, the golf course, and public streets. Successfully adding snow to winter recreation under these constraints requires a special blend of winter recreation and municipal project design skills sets not found in the winter recreation design community. It is a lot different designing winter recreation inside Braemar Park than it is in the wide open spaces of the Soldier Hollow or Vail or Sunday River resorts in Utah, Colorado, and Maine respectively. Our team not only has this special blend, but it has also completed many municipal projects for Edina since the mid 1980’s. We understand the Community that is Edina and what it takes to successfully complete projects in Edina. Edina deserves an expert team playing a proactive and pivotal role helping it make great decisions assuring winter recreation at Braemar Park featuring snow is a successful amenity. The SEH team described by this Qualification has not only provided feasibility study, market analysis/financial model preparation, public engagement including project meetings, bid document preparation, permitting, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for winter recreation projects; but also specifically in Edina. Besides strong winter recreation design and market analysis/financial model preparation bench strength, a detailed understanding of how nearby private property owners might view the impacts of winter recreation are a must. The Representative Projects section of this Qualification demonstrates not only our team’s winter recreation design and market analysis/financial model preparation bench strength, but also its understanding of how adding winter recreation needing snow in metropolitan areas can impact nearby property owners. As a case in point, Paul Pasko will lead our project team as its project manager. Since 1998 and 2002, Paul has had the pleasure of leading the SEH design teams that completed both our Edina municipal and winter recreation featuring snow projects respectively. As project manager, Paul will combine his unique knowledge of both winter recreation inside metropolitan areas and what it takes to successfully complete municipal projects for Edina. Besides Paul, team members Mike Horn, Ken Taillon, Tom Honer and Deric Deuschle have all not only completed Edina municipal projects, but also our winter recreation projects needing snow. They all understand how property owners near Braemar Park might view the impacts of winter recreation. While the resumes contained in this Qualifications section Names of Specific Individuals Assigned to This Project and Their Relative Experience 2SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA provide detailed accounts of our experience adding winter recreation to parks similar to Braemar Park, below are a few key items about a few of these individuals. 1. Mike Horn – Quality Assurance / Quality Control: Before joining SEH, Mike was a project manager for Three Rivers Park District. Mike managed all of Three Rivers Park District’s projects either studying or adding winter recreation needing snow to Park District parks. As the Park District’s consulting engineer, Paul worked with Mike on all of those projects. Since joining SEH, and on behalf of Edina, Mike has been inspecting Edina’s contractor’s work reconstructing both the Driving Range and Executive Golf Course in Braemar Park. 2. Deric Deuschle – Environmental: On behalf of Edina, Deric is providing wetland delineation and environmental permitting services for the project that will reconstruct the 27-hole golf course to and 18-hole golf course at Braemar Park. He provided these same services during the reconstruction of both the Driving Range and Executive Golf Course in Braemar Park. 3. Dave Belin – Market Analysis / Financial Model Preparation: Prepared an analysis and model for Three Rivers Park District during their study of potential summer time alpine activities at Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area. 4. Mark Meadows – Snowmaking Engineering and Mike Parsons – Noise Impact Study Preparation: Were both SEH subconsultants on Three Rivers Park District projects to reconstruct the snow making system at Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area and add snowmaking to cross country ski trails in Hyland Lake Park Reserve. Additionally, Mark was the lead snowmaking engineer for the last two winter Olympic games in Vancouver, Canada and Sochi, Russia. He is currently designing the snowmaking for 2018 Winter Olympics in South Korea. 5. Toby Muse – Site Civil Engineering: Besides taking over project manager duties from Paul for the last 6 street and utility reconstruction projects completed by SEH for Edina, Toby is managing Three Rivers Park District’s project to add the 9-Mile Creek Regional Trail to Edina. We admire Edina for recognizing the opportunity that reconstructing the 27-hole golf course to 18-holes at Braemar Park presents to considering adding winter recreation featuring snow. Our experience shows that by considering both projects together now Edina is already addressing the fact that golf and snow are mutually exclusive. Many communities do not address this fact until it is too late. The price for that tardiness is usually expensive rework to an already built golf course. Today golfers want to use a course as late as November and early as March. During November and March snow is usually being made or melting respectively. We understand this exclusiveness. Golfers do not want snow to diminish their late or early season golf experience. We respect that. We also respect that besides understanding what kind of impacts noise and light generated by winter recreation might have on surrounding private property owners, Edina will need to understand the revenues and expenses winter recreation will present. We have already developed these understandings for other winter recreation areas inside other metropolitan areas. It is of great benefit to Edina that Braemar Park already has a large lit blacktop parking lot, clubhouse (containing Tin Fish), and adequate electrical power needed for a former municipal water well (now used for only golf course irrigation) adjacent to the area being considered for winter recreation shown in Exhibit A. This well can likely become the source of water needed to make snow. Bright green lines in Exhibit A are proposed golf course features. At a very schematic level, we believe the area shown in Exhibit A can physically contain the following opportunities for winter recreation with snow that all of Edina’s property owners and visitors can use even when natural snow is absent without impacting golf. 1. A cross-country skiing trail featuring snow that is about 1.25 kilometers long (loop). 2. The loop could contain about 30, 20, and 50 percent of beginner, intermediate, and difficult terrain levels respectively. 3. Because the loop can be 1.25 kilometers long, by completing laps of the entire loop common cross-country race distances in multiples of 5 kilometers can be achieved. These distances may be attractive to Edina High School’s Nordic Ski Team. Edina could consider hosting high school Nordic ski races on the loop. A sizable parking lot for cars and buses is already present. Additionally the clubhouse and Tin Fish are probably capable of handling concession needs of potential race athletes, their coaches, and fans. 3SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 4. Because the loop could be power groomed, it could periodically host other trail oriented activities such as fat- tire style winter biking and snow shoeing. At the conclusion of these activities, the power-groomer can return the trails to cross country skiing. 5. The loop can connect to possible cross-country skiing trails, featuring natural snow that Edina may choose to locate along the edges of Braemar’s proposed 18-hole golf course. 6. As many as 11 snow tubing lanes that could include as many as 2 handle style tows that return tubers to the top of the hill for another run. 7. Because the snow tubing area could be power groomed, it could periodically host other downhill activities such as sledding or additional intermediate level cross country skiing trails. At the conclusion of these activities, the power-groomer can return the area to snow tubing. Off-winter usage opportunities for this area will likely present themselves to Edina too. Edina may wish to consider opportunities such as zip wires, mountain biking, walking, running, and scenic overlooks for wedding event nuptial services and photography opportunities for wedding parties already using the club house. We are confident that after reviewing the material in this Qualification Edina will see why our project team is uniquely qualified to deliver a successful project. We have the special blend of winter recreation and municipal project skill sets needed to design winter activities needing snow on existing park land within hundreds of feet of private property and public streets. Our combination of park design professionals, real world snowmaking experience, and market analysis/financial model preparation expertise will ensure that all of the Edina’s immediate and long-term needs are covered. We look forward to further discussions with Edina on how SEH can help make this exciting project a reality. Sincerely, Paul J. Pasko III, PE Project Manager CC: Mike Horn, SEH Dave Belin, RRC Associates Mark Meadows, PE, Torrent Engineering and Equipment Mike Parsons, HDR Deric Deuschle, SEH Tom Honer, SEH Ken Taillon, SEH Toby Muse, SEH P:\AE\E\Edina\136169\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\soq\ EDINA 136169_Braemer Golf Course_SOQ_FINAL.pdf 840 860 87 0 880 89 0 85 0 90 0 830 91 0 920 930 940 830 84 0 8 4 0 870 830 870 8 4 0 850 910 930 850 840 92 0 90 0 8 5 0 84 0 840 8 5 0 850 920 860 870 850 9 1 0 860 900 860 870 850 840 850 85 0 830 86 0 860 870 840 8 4 0 850 830 8 6 0 86 0 85 0 860 87 0 850 84 0 850 910 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community 0 500250 Feet µ 5SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SEH Address and Brief History FIRM OVERVIEW SEH is an employee-owned engineering, architectural, environmental, and planning company that helps government, industrial, and commercial clients find answers to the tough questions they face. Our 700 employee-owners share a common goal: Building a Better World for All of Us®. This approach reflects a company-wide commitment to improving the quality of life by designing safer, more sustainable infrastructure for local, state, and federal units of government, and helping industrial and commercial clients achieve their business goals. You will find our clients spread out across the United States - with evidence of our work in 42 states. HISTORY What started as a one-person operation more than 88 years ago has transformed into a nationally recognized consulting firm of more than 700 engineers, architects, planners, and scientists. P.R. Bannister launched SEH in 1927 as P.R. Banister Consulting Engineers in North St. Paul, Minnesota. In 1934, the office moved to St. Paul to accommodate growth in staff and clientele. That same year, the company changed its’ name to Banister Engineering Company. We then moved to Roseville, Minnesota in August 1970, and on October 1, 1971, the name was changed once again to Banister, Short, Elliott, Hendrickson and Associates. The firm was incorporated on July 1, 1975 and the firm’s new name of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. was adopted on July 1, 1977. Today the firm is headquartered in St. Paul and has 30 offices in Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Installing force water main pipe and electric cables for snowmaking for the Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-country Skiing at Hyland Lake Park Reserve – Bloomington, Minn. Sound levels caused by operating snowmaking machines in the neighborhood adjacent to Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area in Bloomington, MN. Sound levels caused by operating snowmaking machines in the neighborhood adjacent to Hyland Lake Park Reserve in Bloomington, MN. Address: 10901 Red Circle Drive Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Phone: 952.912.2600 6SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HDR Inc. (HDR) HDR was founded 90 years ago. They are a leader in performing NEPA noise and vibration analyses for projects involving surface transportation systems and transit, stationary and mobile noise sources including combustion turbines, snow-making machines, wind farms, construction projects, mineral extraction, water delivery/distribution systems, wastewater treatment facilities, and other architectural, industrial, and infrastructure noise sources. They can provide: Subconsultant Name, Address, and Brief History We have supplemented our team with three subconsultant firms. RRC Associates, Torrent Engineering & Equipment, and HDR are global leaders in their respective fields. RRC Associates (RRC) RRC was founded in 1983, and is the recognized leader in consumer intelligence and strategic market research for the tourism and recreation industries. RRC provides a broad range of market research, land use planning, real estate, customer satisfaction, and media and communications research services. Their focus is on providing high-quality, customized market research, planning, and analysis services to our clients. RRC is a full-service research company utilizing a variety of tools including web-based, intercept, kiosk, mail, and phone surveys and focus groups to meet client needs. Secondary research is also an important tool for RRC for projects such as competitive analysis and market feasibility studies. Results from their research have been used for branding, positioning, pricing, and planning decisions by a wide variety of clients. Torrent Engineering & Equipment (TEE) TEE was established in 2000. Its two co-owners each have over 30 years of experience related to snowmaking systems and equipment. TEE encompasses system engineering, equipment selection and application, and prefabricated systems to provide practical snowmaking process equipment solutions to their clients. Their expertise includes: • Mechanical, electrical, and controls engineering • Snowmaking system design • Practical knowledge of pumping equipment and controls • Packaged (prefabricated) pump systems Address: 701 Xenia Ave. South Suite 600 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Phone: 763.591.5400 • Process cooling systems • Machine automation, motor controls, and electrical distribution • Air & Range Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ/ RAICUZ) Studies • Airport Ground Noise Control • Architectural Studies • Environmental Assessments (EA) and Impact Statements (EISImpulsive or Low Frequency Noise) • Industrial Noise Sources (oil & gas, mining, and water- related projects) • FAA Part 150 Studies • Large & Small Arms Acoustical Analysis • Noise Monitoring & Modeling (stationary and mobile noise sources) • Occupational Noise, Worker Exposure & Noise Reduction strategies • Recreational Noise • Rocket Launch & Commercial Space Flight Noise • Supersonic/Subsonic Noise • Training Seminars & Guidelines • Transportation Noise Sources (maritime, highway, transit, passenger, freight & high-speed rail) • Underwater Acoustic Monitoring Address: 4770 Baseline Road Suite 360 Boulder, CO 80303 Phone: 303.449.6558 Address: PO Box 270 10693 N. Orn Rd. Millford, IN 46542 Phone: 574.658.3200 7SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Names of Specific Individuals Assigned to this Project and their Relative Experience To meet the City of Edina’s needs in designing a Winter Recreational Area, we have assembled a team with direct relevant experience. The following organizational chart identifies those team members proposed for this project and the roles and reporting structure. SEH, HDR and TEE team members listed below have been working together since 2002 providing study, market analysis/financial modelling, noise impact studies, bid document preparation, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for SEH’s winter recreation projects. Resumes for the individuals identified in the organizational chart follow. City of Edina Project Manager Paul Pasko III, PE SEH Snowmaking Engineering Mark Meadows, PE TEE Electrical Power Distribution Tom Honer, PE SEH Site Civil Engineering Toby Muse, PE SEH Paul Pasko III, PE SEH Market Analysis/Financial Model Preparation Dave Belin RRC Environmental Deric Deuschle, CWD SEH Lighting Ken Taillon SEH Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Mike Horn, LA SEH Noise Impact Study Preparation Mike Parsons HDR 8SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Paul J. Pasko III, PE Project Manager and Site Civil Engineering Mr. Pasko is a project manager/engineer with 28 years of experience in a wide variety of civil and municipal engineering projects. Paul’s responsibilities range from project conception to completion, including preparing scoping level studies, feasibility studies, and preliminary and final design. He also works on project management, construction administration and staking. Paul has worked on projects that include snowmaking systems, winter recreation activity design, sanitary sewer collection systems, water distribution systems, grading and drainage, site development and engineering, and streets and roadways. He also brings experience with public hearings and both written and presented public communications. Paul was the recipient of the 2015 Charles W. Britzius Distinguished Engineer Award, as decided by the Minnesota Federation of Engineering, Science and Technology Societies (MFESTS), and he was named the 2014 Engineer of the Year by the Minnesota Society of Professional Engineers (MnSPE). EXPERIENCE Elm Creek Park Reserve Winter Recreation Area Phase I (Three Rivers Park District) – Osseo, Minn. Project manager of this $1.2 million winter recreation project. Based on a scoping level design prepared by the Three Rivers Park District staff, Paul coordinated design meetings with Park District staff and assisted with informational meetings for the Park District Board and its residential neighbors. Paul also prepared plans, specifications, and cost estimate for civil site improvements and mechanical and electrical equipment; provided bidding assistance, and construction administration, observation, and staking; and was responsible for project management during the construction. The project featured the addition of mechanical and electrical systems along 2.6 km of existing cross-country ski trails, allowing for snowmaking activities to occur along these trails. Mechanical and electrical systems were also added to nine acres of hillside for snowmaking activities on a snow tubing and snowboard and downhill ski area. Project components included the construction of a 4.1 MG clay-lined reservoir to store water used to make snow, regrading a nine-acre hillside for downhill skiing, snowboarding, and snow tubing activities, snowmaking pump skid, 8,500 ft. of steel pipe connected to 32 snowmaking hydrants, cast-in-place concrete wet well and foundation for the pump skid and its wood framed pump house, reconstruction of the existing cross-country ski trail lighting system, reconstruction of an 89-stall bituminous parking lot, stormwater runoff detention basin, tree clearing plan to make room for the snowmaking pipe network, realignment of 1,200 ft. of 10 ft. wide bituminous bicycle trail, and a restoration plan for park areas disturbed by construction. Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-Country Skiing at Hyland Lake Park Reserve (Three Rivers Park District) –Bloomington, Minn. Project manager on the $4.2 million improvement project including snowmaking and lighted trail development for cross country skiing for Hyland Lake Regional Park. Paul prepared plans and a cost estimate for civil site improvements and mechanical and electrical equipment. The project featured the addition of mechanical and electrical systems along five km of existing and proposed cross-country ski trails allowing for snowmaking activities to occur along these trails. Project components included the construction of an intake pipe from Hyland Lake for water used to make snow, reconstruction of an existing boat ramp adjacent to the proposed intake pipe, snowmaking pump skid, 11,900 ft. of steel pipe connected to 42 snowmaking SEH OFFICE LOCATION Minnetonka, Minn. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign CONTINUING EDUCATION Safety Training Refresher (2012) PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer in Minnesota (# 24628, 1996) and Illinois (#062-048410, 1993) PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM), Member (1996–present) Minnesota Society of Professional Engineers (MSPE), Member (1996–present) Secretary (1999–2003) American Public Works Association (APWA) Minnesota Chapter, Member (1996–present) Education and Training Subcommittee, Member (2010–present) AWARDS 2014 Engineer of the Year, Minnesota Society of Professional Engineers (MSPE) 9SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA hydrants, cast-in-place concrete wet well and foundation for the pump skid and its wood framed pump house, reconstruction of the existing cross-country ski trail lighting system, tree clearing plan to make room for the snowmaking pipe network, and a restoration plan for park areas disturbed by construction. Dellwood Park Winter Recreation Area (Lockport Area Township Park District) – Lockport, Ill. Project manager for a schematic level sketch of park improvements, opinions of construction costs, and yearly operating costs and revenues for the winter recreation area. Paul prepared a forces and issues matrix outlining pros and cons of impacts on various specific project elements. Recognizing the satisfaction visitors already experience sledding at Dellwood Park caused the Lockport Area Township Park District to ask itself if that satisfaction could be a source of revenue, particularly if winter recreation activities supported by machine-made snow, snow tubing and snowboarding, were added to Dellwood Park. Paul completed schematic level investigations into the best location in the park for snow tubing and snowboarding, possible water sources for snowmaking operations, scope of slope side operations, and possible locations for parking lots, He also completed geotechnical investigations looking for bedrock depths, socio-political issues such as impacts of construction and winter operations on nearby existing neighborhoods and the likelihood of unearthing native American and civil war artifacts during construction. Other tasks included looking at sources of electricity for snowmaking operations and slope lighting for night time operations. Battle Creek Regional Park East (Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department) – St. Paul, Minn. Project manager for the study for adding snowmaking to an existing sledding hill and cross-country ski trails within the park at an estimated cost of $2.7 million. The study featured adding mechanical and electrical systems to a 5.7 acre sledding hill and along 2.5 km of cross-country ski trails to allow for snowmaking activities. Furthermore, area lighting was added to the sledding hill to convert the hill from a sledding to a snowboard and downhill ski area. Project components studied included the construction of a 1.9 MG plastic-lined reservoir to store water used to make snow, implications of filling the reservoir with water from City-owned water main, snowmaking pump skid, 7,200 ft. of steel pipe connected to 36 snowmaking hydrants, cast-in-place concrete wet well and foundation for the pump skid and its wood framed pump house, and reconstruction of the existing cross-country ski trail lighting system. Clifton E. French Regional Park Feasibility Study (Three Rivers Park District) – Plymouth, Minn. Project manager for preparation of a study adding snowmaking to an existing sledding hill and cross country ski trails within the park at an estimated cost of $5.6 million. The study featured adding mechanical and electrical systems to a 0.7 acre sliding hill and along 2.5 km of cross-country ski trails to allow for snowmaking activities. Project components studied included the construction of a 6.7 MG clay-lined reservoir to store water used to make snow, implications of filling the reservoir with water from City-owned water main, snowmaking pump skid, 11,500 ft. of steel pipe connected to 46 snowmaking hydrants, cast-in- place concrete wet well and foundation for the pump skid and its wood framed pump house, and reconstruction of the existing cross-country ski trail lighting system. Country Club Neighborhood Street and Utility Reconstruction – City of Edina, Minn. Project manager and construction administrator for the temporary sanitary sewer and water main pipe networks, extensions of the existing storm sewer network, stormwater runoff treatment manholes, and street section reconstruction for a total cost of $13.2 million. The project featured conventional aggregate base, bituminous paving, and replacement of existing curb and gutter, sidewalk spot repairs, replacement of existing road signage, and the reconstruction of the existing street light network. It included working with residents to mutually agree on a solution to the cut-through vehicle traffic in the northeast part of Edina in which the project is located. Residents requesting that cut-through traffic be addressed came not just from Edina, but also from the border Cities of St. Louis Park and Minneapolis. The project then applied every trenchless utility reconstruction method known to the industry to reconstruct all of the public utilities along five miles of streets while not removing any boulevard trees. Utility reconstruction included reconstructing the City-owned water service pipe to the curb stop and the privately owned sanitary service pipe in the right-of-way. Paul prepared feasibility studiesand coordinated open houses, contractor think tank workshops, and neighborhood meetings. He also presented the project to the City’s Transportation Commission, Heritage Preservation Board and Council. Paul was responsible for the plans, specifications, cost estimates, bid assistance to the City, and provided construction administration, observation, staking, and project management during construction. Paul J. Pasko III, PE Continued 10SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Pamela Park Neighborhood Street Improvements – City of Edina, Minn. Project manager for this $2.3 million reconstruction of the local streets. As part of their five-year Capital Improvement Plan, the City identified this neighborhood as needing street reconstruction. Paul prepared feasibility studies, coordinated open houses and neighborhood meetings, prepared plans, specifications, cost estimates, and provided bidding assistance to the City. The project included spot repairs of sanitary sewer; spot repairs of water main; storm sewer extensions using both open cut and horizontal directional drilling methods; stormwater runoff treatment manholes and biotreatment swales; street sections consisting of both conventional and recycled aggregate bases; bituminous paving; construction of new curb and gutter and rehabilitation of existing curb and gutter. The project also featured the addition of a drain tile pipe along both sides of each street using trenchless construction methods. The drain tile is connected to the neighborhood storm sewer pipe network. Homeowners were encouraged to connect their sump pump discharge hoses to this drain tile to prevent discharges into the City’s sanitary sewer pipe network. St. John’s Park Neighborhood Street Improvements – City of Edina, Minn. Project manager for a $1.7 million project reconstructing the local streets. As part of their five-year Capital Improvement Plan, the City identified this neighborhood as needing street reconstruction. Paul prepared feasibility studies; coordinated open houses and neighborhood meetings; prepared plans, specifications, and a cost estimate; provided bid assistance to the City; and provided construction administration, observation, staking, and project management during construction. The project included spot repairs and cured-in-place pipe lining of sanitary sewer; spot repairs of water main; storm sewer extensions; stormwater runoff treatment manholes; street sections consisting of both conventional and recycled aggregate bases; bituminous paving; construction of new curb and gutter and rehabilitation of existing curb and gutter. The project also featured the addition of a drain tile pipe along both sides of each street using trenchless construction methods. The drain tile is connected to the neighborhood storm sewer pipe network. Homeowners were then encouraged to connect their sump pump discharge hoses to this drain tile to prevent discharges into the City’s sanitary sewer pipe network Paul J. Pasko III, PE Continued 11SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Mike Horn, LA Quality Assurance/Quality Control Mr. Horn has wide-ranging experience in the management of rural, urban and regional planning projects where ideation and creativity is the foundation of his approach. Mike is a senior project manager, respected industry leader and technical specialist in the areas of landscape architecture and planning. He specializes in park assessments and development, ADA and universal design, snowmaking applications, play area development and boat/fishing access. Mike has extensive knowledge of trail design from mountain hiking trails and cross- county ski trails to paved multi-use trails. EXPERIENCE AS A PROJECT MANAGER FOR THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT PRIOR TO JOINING SEH Elm Creek Park Reserve – Winter Recreation Area Phase I – Osseo, Minnesota Project manager of the design and construction for snowmaking, water storage, x-country ski trails, snow tubing, downhill area, and ski chalet. Mike was responsible for meeting expectation of the Three Rivers Park District’s Superintendent and Board of Commissioners to complete the snowmaking phase prior to the winter season. Location Study for Winter Recreation Featuring Machine Made Snow at Clifton E. French, Hyland Lake, and Elm Creek Park Reserves Project manager directing the feasibility study between three parks to determine the next park to develop into a winter recreation facility for x-county skiing. Mike worked closely with Park District staff and the consulting firm to determine trail routing, water acquisition and cooling, parking and infrastructure requirements, permitting, and projected user base. Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-Country Skiing at Hyland Lake Park Reserve – Bloomington, Minnesota Project manager for the design and development of snowmaking and trail routing for five kilometers of x-country skiing. Mike worked closely with park commissioners and staff to provide both a beginner and challenging trail routing for a variety of ski users. Hyland Bush Anderson Lakes Park Reserve – Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area (HSSA)– Bloomington, Minnesota Project manager for the economic feasibility and master plan for the revitalization of the popular HSSA ski area. Mike worked closely with City of Bloomington Planners, Park District Superintendent and Board of Commissioners to develop off-season revenue opportunities, in addition to parking and site strategies to relieve congestion in the surrounding neighborhood. EXPERIENCE SINCE JOINING SEH Arden Neighborhood A – Utility and Street Reconstruction – Edina, Minnesota Public relations and resident project representative for the Arden A neighborhood for utility and street replacement for over 200 residences. Mike was the primary contact person during construction for homeowners, fielding all questions and concerns and providing weekly web based updates. Mike was also the primary inspector of contracted work associated with water and sewer replacement. Braemar Executive Golf Course 2015 Reconstruction – Edina, Minnesota Inspector for erosion control measures during construction. Mike attended weekly construction meetings and provided inspection services to assure all erosion control structures were maintained or provided recommendations for additional measures if needed in specific areas. SEH OFFICE LOCATION Minnetonka, Minn. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science Horticulture (Landscape Design Option) Montana State University-Bozeman CONTINUING EDUCATION Project Management University of Minnesota-Minneapolis REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Landscape Architect in Minnesota (#41906, 2002) PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS American Society of Landscape Architecture (ASLA), Member (2002–present) AWARDS 1999 Award of Excellence, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.12WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Mark R. Meadows, PE TORRENT Engineering & Equipment Snowmaking Engineer Qualifications: Mark has over 25 years of engineering experience related to snowmaking system design and installation worldwide. His experience includes complete system design, equipment specification and application, project management, and on-site engineering supervision and inspection. Mark was the lead snowmaking engineer as part of the design team for the last two winter Olympics, Whistler/Cypress (Vancouver) and Rosa Khutor (Sochi), and is presently involved in planning for the 2018 winter games in South Korea. Mark is the lead snowmaking engineer for clients North American including Vail Resorts, Aspen Skiing Company, Peak Resorts, and Powder Corporation among others. Mark has been a co-owner of Torrent since 2000. Education: •Bachelors Degree, Mechanical Engineering Technology Rochester Institute of Technology •Associates Degree, Design and Drafting Alfred State College Professional Registration: •NYS Professional Engineer, License 071591 •CA Professional Engineer, License M 31632 •CO Professional Engineer, License 38008 •AZ Professional Engineer, License 45955 •PA Professional Engineer, License PE078860 Recent Projects: SEH / Hyland Lake, MN - 2013 New snowmaking system design for cross-country ski area including pump station and trail piping SMI / Thaiwoo, China - 2013 Detailed snowmaking system design for a new large resort Stowe, VT - 2013 Booster pump station design Sunday River, ME - 2012 Snowmaking system analysis and master planning services Arizona Snowbowl, AZ -2011 Final design installation drawings and specifications for complete new airless type snowmaking system including piping, electrical, pump station, and water cooling Aspen Highlands, CO - 2011 Snowmaking system expansion engineering Copper Mountain, CO - 2011 Mountain system, pump station, and compressor expansion for early season race training venue snowmaking coverage Mount Snow, VT - 2009-10 Major pumping infrastructure upgrade including withdrawal, transfer, and two on-mountain booster pump stations SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.13WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA EDUCATION Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of WI Madison, 1997 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS PE – Minnesota (#45493) Oregon (#81444) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Institute of Noise Control Engineering SPECIALIZED TRAINING 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Site Training (HAZWOPER) HDR TENURE 16+ Years INDUSTRY TENURE 17+ Years TRAINING NHI Course #142051 Highway Traffic Noise Transit Noise & Vibration Impact Assessment Trained Missouri DOT on TNM Analyses Michael J. Parsons, PE, INCE Civil Engineer/Noise Specialist Mr. Parsons is a civil engineer with over 16 years of experience finding creative solutions to address noise and vibration on projects throughout Minnesota and North America. He has extensive experience performing NEPA noise and vibration analyses for projects involving surface transportation systems and transit, stationary and mobile sources including combustion turbines, snow-making machines, wind farms, construction projects, mineral extraction, water delivery/distribution systems, wastewater treatment facilities, and other architectural, industrial, and infrastructure noise sources. HDR PROJECT EXPERIENCE Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area Noise Study, Bloomington, MN. HDR was hired to perform the noise analysis for the proposed expansion of the Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area snow making process. Existing noise levels were measured in the project area, and future noise levels were predicted using Cadna-A with the proposed snow making machines operating. Results were summarized in a technical report. Noise Study for Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-Country Skiing at Hyland Lake Park Reserve, Bloomington, MN. HDR was hired to perform the noise analysis for the affects on private property owners close to existing cross country ski trail segments to potentially receive machine made snow. Existing noise levels were measured in the project area, and future noise levels were predicted using Cadna-A with the proposed snow making machines operating. Results were summarized in a technical report. MnDOT Cayuga Noise Analysis. The Cayuga Project is located on I-35E between University Avenue and Maryland Avenue in Saint Paul, MN. The scope of the project includes reconstruction and realignment of I-35E. Thirteen bridges will be replaced or constructed. Among the significant improvements, the existing Pennsylvania Avenue/I-35E interchange will be replaced by a new interchange at Cayuga Street, correcting the current safety and operational issues at Pennsylvania and improving access for Saint Paul's recently constructed Phalen Boulevard corridor. Capacity will be added in each direction and the existing roadway geometry will be improved. A noise analysis was performed of the existing and proposed roadway using the Mn/DOT MINNOISE model. A public meeting was held to discuss and solicit desire for the noise walls that were designed as part of the noise analysis. MnDOT TH 100 Noise and Air Quality Analysis. Mr. Parsons was the Project Manger and lead noise analyst for the TH 100 Noise and Air Quality Analysis. This project is located in St. Louis Park, MN and evaluated the TH 100 reconstruction and auxiliary lane addition from 36th Street to Cedar Lake Road, including the cross streets of Cedar Lake Road, Minnetonka Boulevard, Highway 7/County Road 25, and 36th Street. The final product will assist the State in writing the required environmental documentation and also assist the state with the required public involvement process to gain municipal consent. The newly enacted, 2011 state noise policy was followed throughout this project including hosting and leading the Noise Advisory Committee meetings with area residents and the balloting of benefited receptors. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.14WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 15SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Deric R. Deuschle, CWD Environmental Mr. Deuschle is a senior scientist with 16 years of environmental consulting and ecological research experience. Deric is an aquatic ecologist and leader of SEH’s natural resources team. Deric provides project management and technical leadership for wetland services, such as delineations, permitting, mitigation siting and design, and monitoring. He produces environmental documents including environmental assessments (EA), environmental assessments worksheets (EAW), and EISs. Deric brings expertise in threatened and endangered species surveys, tree inventories, water quality analysis, aquatic invertebrate ecology, stream and large river ecology, fish and wildlife studies, nutrient loading analysis, GIS, and GPS. EXPERIENCE Braemar Golf Course Driving Range and Executive Course Reconstruction – City of Edina, Minn. Aquatic ecologist leading the wetland delineations and permitting for the reconstruction of the driving range and the nine-hole executive course. Project included a determination of jurisdictional status of wetlands, with the determination that the majority of aquatic features were incidental or not waters of the United States. A small wetland was created as mitigation for unavoidable impacts, and extensive areas of short grass prairie and oak savanna were created or restored to provide ecological restoration as a course augmentation. Erosion control inspections were completed throughout the reconstruction to support NPDES permit requirements. Braemar Golf Course Reconstruction – City of Edina, Minn. Aquatic ecologist leading the wetland delineations and permitting for the reconstruction and consolidation of the Braemar Golf Course from 27 to 18 holes. Project included wetland delineations, functions and values assessments, and permitting for minor wetland impacts. A six-acre wetland and floodplain mitigation site was designed along the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek, as were the establishment of upland buffer and oak savanna to integrate ecological enhancement within the course design. Feasibility Study of Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-Country Skiing at Hyland Lake Park Reserve (Three Rivers Park District) – City of Bloomington, Minn. Aquatic ecologist on the analysis of Hyland Lake water temperatures to determine the feasibility of using the lake as a water source for machine made snow for use on cross- country ski trails. Deric completed analysis and assessment of when ice-in would occur on the lake as a surrogate for predicting when snow-making operations could begin in the fall. Bid Document Preparation and Construction Phase Services for Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-Country Skiing at Hyland Lake Park Reserve – City of Bloomington, Minn. Aquatic ecologist who oversaw the wetland delineations, permitting, and water appropriation for the trail alignment and placement of utilities to create snow on a cross-country ski circuit. The project also required agency coordination for permitting of an intake structure and water appropriation from Hyland Lake and for wetland impacts associated with the project from placement of electrical and water utilities, and the pump house. D&I Railroad Relocation – Hawarden, Iowa. Project manager for the completion of a Categorical Exclusion for the relocation of two miles of railroad currently located on an unstable slope along the Big Sioux River. The project required the completion of wetland delineations, review of cultural resources, threatened and endangered species, and floodplain determination. The document was approved by the Federal Rail Authority and approved for a federal grant. SEH OFFICE LOCATION St. Paul, Minn. EDUCATION Master of Science Biology University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Bachelor of Science Biology Winona State University Winona, Minn. CONTINUING EDUCATION MnDOT, Hydinfra (2005, 2007) Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Karner Blue Butterfly HCP Monitoring (2008) CERTIFICATIONS Certified Wetland Delineator (CWD) (2005), University of Minnesota-Water Resources Center OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER (Specialist) OSHA 8 Hour HAZWOPER (Refresher) (2014), SEH PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Open Space Commission, City of Andover, Minn., Chairman (2007) Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, Vice Chairman (2002–2007) Wetland Professionals Association, Member (2001) 16SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Toby Muse, PE Site Civil Engineering Mr. Muse is a senior project manager with 16 years of experience who leads and facilitates site civil planning and design and construction services, including numerous park projects and City of Edina neighborhood and street reconstruction projects. He has worked on project design elements that include roads, trails, bridges, boardwalks and parking lots, and utility systems including stormwater detention/conveyance, sanitary sewer, water distribution, lighting and traffic signals. EXPERIENCE Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (Three Rivers Park District) – Edina, Minn. Project manager for this six+ mile segment of regional trail through the City of Edina. Led planning, design and construction services for design of the trail that adhered to MnDOT federal/state aid design standards. Developed detailed plans, specifications, cost estimates and easements. Challenges included finding design solutions for a alignment that traversed through wetlands, floodplains, and developing residential and commercial corridors including over MnDOT trunk highways and under 70th Street via pedestrian bridges and a box culvert. Fish Lake Regional Park Pavement Rehabilitation (Three Rivers Park District) – Maple Grove, Minn. Project manager responsible for design and construction administration of this regional park improvement project. Responsibilities included the development of detailed plans, specifications, and cost estimates. Project rehabilitated parking lots, roads, trails, and a boat ramp. Included design of a porous concrete paver block system within the parking bays of the main visitor center parking lot, aquatic invasive species station, LED lighting, design of new water and sewer services by horizontal directional drill to serve a maintenance building and development of a robust construction staging and sequencing plan to facilitate park programs during construction of the roads and parking lots. Edina Project Portfolio Project manager responsible for feasibility study development, preliminary and final design, cost estimating, preparation of plans and specifications and construction administration. • Arden Park D Roadway Improvements • 54th Street Reconstruction • Normandale Neighborhood Roadway Improvements • Richmond Hills Park Roadway Improvements • Gallagher Drive Reconstruction • Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements SEH OFFICE LOCATION Minnetonka, Minn. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering University of North Dakota- Grand Forks REGISTRATIONS/ CERTIFICATIONS Professional Engineer in Minnesota (#43364, 2004) PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Minnesota Public Works Association (MPWA), Member (2007-present) City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM), Member (2007-present) Minnesota Society of Professional Engineers (MSPE), Member (2007-present) 17SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Thomas D. Honer, PE Electrical Power Distribution Mr. Honer is an electrical design, construction, engineering manager with more than 15 years of experience in the power and control system design. Tom has been involved in designs, evaluation, and construction of water and wastewater treatment facilities, hotels with water parks, parks and recreational park centers, industrial and commercial projects, and transmission. He is responsible for the design and preparation of construction documents for power distribution, lighting, motor controls, instrumentation, SCADA, and standby power. Tom also has experience in all voltage ranges from low voltage (0-480 volt), medium voltage (4.160-38kV) and high voltage. (69-230 kV). His design experience also includes fire alarm, lightning protection, and management of electrical projects from conceptual phase to completion of construction. Tom’s experience includes electrical and control design with specialty systems that include generators for emergencies, backup power, and peak shaving, electrical equipment evaluation, and replacement. He has also dealt with complex distribution projects where voltage drop is a major concern. EXPERIENCE Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-Country Skiing for Hyland Lake Regional Park (Three Rivers Park District) – Bloomington, Minn. Oversaw electrical group construction activities for project which featured the addition of electrical infrastructure along 5K of cross-country ski trails allowing for trail lighting and snowmaking operations. Electrical systems were also added to 2.9 acres of hillside for lighting and snowmaking operations on an existing sledding area. Mercury Removal – City of Hibbing, Minn. Electrical engineer for the design of 480 volt service to new filter building from existing service on site. Project included layout power, lighting, and controls for filter equipment. New programmable logic controller panel connected to existing system. Tom resized and designed new backup generation system to operate entire plant and used for peak shaving, 1000 kW gen set. Designed 2012-2013, Construction 2013 to present. Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements – City of Mora, Minn. Electrical engineer for modification to exiting facility, new pumping building, and modification to existing lift stations. Tom evaluated existing electrical equipment and provided design modification for new electrical equipment, controls, and SCADA. Equipment consisted of new motors control centers, upgrade utlity power, backup generation, instrumentation and controls, and upgrade SCADA system. Tracy Avenue Roundabout – City of Edina, Minn. Lighting Designer for a roundabout along collector roadways. Ken prepared construction documents for the design which specified LED lighting equipment capable of connecting to the City’s intelligent lighting control system. Arden Park – City of Edina, Minn. Lighting Designer for a residential decorative street lighting installation within the Arden Park neighborhood. Ken prepared construction documents for the design which incorporated a new LED lighting system. Ken was also responsible for project administration, and construction observation. SEH OFFICE LOCATION St. Paul, Minn. EDUCATION Bachelor of Science Electrical Engineering North Dakota State University-Fargo PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Professional Engineer in Alberta (#183202, 2014), California (#19064, 2009), Colorado (#PE-43529, 2009), Idaho (#14106, 2010), Illinois (#062062283, 2010), Indiana (#PE11011500, 2010), Iowa (#19681, 2010), Kansas (#20838, 2009), Louisiana (#PE.0035221, 2010), Minnesota (#45519, 2006), Montana (#19682, 2010), Nebraska (#E13252, 2010), North Dakota (#5634, 2006), Oregon (#84190PE, 2010), South Dakota (#10208, 2010) Virginia (#0402046738, 2009), Washington (#46832, 2010), Wisconsin (#40371, 2009), and Wyoming (#12710, 2010) PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS North Central Electrical League (NCEES), Member (2013) 18SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Kenneth S. Taillon Lighting Mr. Taillon has 21 years of experience in a wide variety of outdoor lighting projects for government agencies across the upper Midwest. Ken’s work focuses on roadway lighting for state highways, commercial and residential areas, downtown streetscapes, and lighting for parks, parking lots, and sports facilities. His areas of expertise include lighting planning and policy development, design, specifications, construction observation, equipment photometric and mechanical evaluation, intelligent lighting management systems, solid state (LED) lighting equipment, and addressing operation and maintenance issues. EXPERIENCE Battle Creek Regional Park East (Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department) – St. Paul, Minn. Lighting and electrical specialist for a study for the addition of snowmaking and lighting to an existing sledding hill and cross-country ski trails within the park. Ken was responsible for the study which featured adding electrical and lighting systems to a 5.7 acre sledding/skiing hill and along 2.5 km of cross-country ski trails to allow for snowmaking, trail and site lighting. Snow Tubing Feasibility Study (Saint Croix National Golf and Event Center) – Somerset, Wis. Prepared feasibility study to add snowmaking and lighting to an existing driving range at the golf course to enable winter snow tubing. Ken completed the study which featured the addition of electrical infrastructure to a 5.0 acre driving range to accommodate for snowmaking and site lighting. Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-Country Skiing for Hyland Lake Regional Park (Three Rivers Park District) – Bloomington, Minn. Project manager for electrical equipment improvements. Ken prepared plans and cost estimates which featured the addition of electrical infrastructure along 5K of cross-country ski trails allowing for trail lighting and snowmaking operations. Electrical systems were also added to 2.9 acres of hillside for lighting and snowmaking operations on an existing sledding area. Elm Creek Park Reserve Winter Recreation Area Phases I & 2 (Three Rivers Park District) – Osseo, Minn. Lighting and electrical design for a parking lots, tubing, and downhill ski hills, illuminated cross-country ski trail and training area, and snowmaking facilities. Ken provided construction documents and construction administration for the installation of new park electrical and lighting systems. The electrical system involved the design for the installation of new lighting and snowmaking facilities, and associated equipment. Assisted with electrical and lighting design for 8,300 sq. ft. visitors center. Country Club Area, Lighting Improvements – City of Edina, Minn. Lighting Designer for a residential decorative street lighting installation within the Country Club neighborhood. Ken prepared construction documents for the design which incorporated a new lighting system with numerous existing lighting circuits. Ken was also responsible for project administration, and construction observation. SEH OFFICE LOCATION St. Paul, Minn. EDUCATION Bachelor of Applied Science Industrial Technology (Electronics, Management) University of Minnesota–Duluth CONTINUING EDUCATION Roadway Lighting Design (06/2001), Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Traffic Signal Design (05/1996), University of Minnesota CERTIFICATIONS Signal and Lighting II, Design and Inspection (2010), Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Illuminating Engineering Society (IES), Member Vadnais Heights Planning Commission, Former Member 19SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Industrial Park Lighting Improvements – City of Edina, Minn. Project Manager of a stand-alone street lighting project that involved the replacement of existing lighting systems that have outlived their useful life. The new state-of-the-art system incorporates dimmable LED lighting units and a control system that provides revenue grade metering and monitoring of luminaire operating hours, and operating characteristics. The system enables the City to assign specific lighting units to unique operating and lighting level schedules. The system currently dims the lighting units to lower levels during off-peak hours. Ken was responsible for the design including complete construction document preparation, project administration, and construction observation. Tracy Avenue Roundabout – City of Edina, Minn. Lighting Designer for a roundabout along collector roadways. Ken prepared construction documents for the design which specified LED lighting equipment capable of connecting to the City’s intelligent lighting control system. Arden Park – City of Edina, Minn. Lighting Designer for a residential decorative street lighting installation within the Arden Park neighborhood. Ken prepared construction documents for the design which incorporated a new LED lighting system. Ken was also responsible for project administration, and construction observation. Kenneth S. Taillon Continued 20SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Production Schedule Our team’s special blend of winter recreation and municipal project design skills sets tell us the following production schedule is feasible for possibly adding winter recreation to Braemar Park.. Production Milestone Date Comment Receive Notice to Proceed with Feasibility Study Spring 2016 Host Public Information Meeting to Present the Proposed Project not only to Braemar Park’s Neighbors, but also Interested Residents and Visitors Late Summer 2016 Present Feasibility Study to City Council for Consideration of Accepting the Study and Ordering the Preparation of Bidding Documents Early Fall 2016 27-hole Golf Course Closes for Reconstruction to an 18-hole Golf Course Fall 2016 While not part of possible Winter Recreation Park construction, this date is nevertheless significant. Prepare Bidding Documents Fall / Winter 2016 Open Bids and Award a Construction Contract Late Winter 2017 Construction Spring – Fall 2017 Open Winter Recreation for Business December 2017 Weather dependent Open 18-hole Golf Course for Business Summer 2018 While not part of possible Winter Recreation Park construction, this date is nevertheless significant. 21SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Winter Recreational Park Sioux City, Iowa With the exception of Mike Horn, Toby Muse and Mike Parsons, the entire team listed in this Qualification is working on this soon to be completed project. This project is too current to show up yet in the resumes included with this Qualification. Completed a feasibility study, including a market analysis/financial model, for civil site improvements and mechanical and electrical equipment for this $17.9 million dollar project that will add both nordic and downhill skiing, and snow tubing featuring machine-made snow plus outdoor ice skating rinks to Cone Park located within Sioux City. The study included schematic level design of a chalet supporting both winter and possible summer time activities. Activities were added to Cone Park in three phases. We also completed bid document preparation services for civil site improvements and mechanical and electrical equipment for the $4.3 million ‘Start-Up’ phase adding snow tubing with its supporting machine made snow, area lighting, and ski lift infrastructure. The City will open bids during May 2016. We anticipate providing construction administration and inspection services during summer through winter 2016. Project components include tree clearing to make room not just for nordic and downhill skiing and snow tubing, but also for the snowmaking pipe network itself; constructing an intake pipe from an on-site stormwater detention pond for water used to make snow; cast-in-place concrete wet well and foundation for the pump skid and its pump house next to the detention pond; snowmaking pump skid itself; steel pipe connecting the pump house to snowmaking hydrants out in Cone Park; area lighting for nordic and downhill skiing and snow tubing; public meetings with adjacent property owners; and a restoration plan for park areas disturbed by construction. Reference: City of Sioux City, Iowa Matt Salvatore – Parks and Recreation Director 401 Gordon Dr. P.O. Box 447 Sioux City, Iowa 51102 712.224.5126 Year Completed: 2017 Representative Projects Our qualified team has already provided feasibility study, market analysis/financial model, and bid document preparation services plus public meetings and bidding assistance, plus construction phase services for winter recreation projects featuring activities that require machine-made snow (snow) inside metropolitan areas for many projects similar to this one at Braemar Park. The following pages demonstrate that experience and includes references for those projects. 22SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Snowmaking Study, Battle Creek Regional Park East Reference: Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department Greg Mack, Director 2015 N. Van Dyke Street Maplewood, Minnesota 55109-3796 651.748.2500 Year Completed: 2007- Present City of St. Paul, Minn. Completed a study to add snowmaking to a sledding hill and cross- country ski trails within the existing park at an estimated cost of $2.7 million. The study featured adding mechanical and electrical systems to a 5.7 acre sledding hill and along 2.5 km of cross-country ski trails to allow for snowmaking activities. Furthermore, area lighting was added to the sledding hill to convert the hill from a sledding to a snowboard and downhill ski area. Project components studied included the construction of a 1.9 million gallon plastic-lined reservoir to store water used to make snow, implications of filling the reservoir with water from City-owned water main, snowmaking pump skid, 7,200 feet of steel pipe connected to 36 snowmaking hydrants, cast-in-place concrete wet well and foundation for the pump skid and its wood framed pump house, and reconstruction of the existing cross-country ski trail lighting system. Gamehaven Reservoir Park, Winter Recreation Concept Plan/Letter of Endorsement (Rochester Active Sports Club) Reference: Rochester Active Sports Club Michael O’Connor,Member 507.319.0142 Year Completed: 2014 to Present Rochester, Minn. The Rochester Active Sports Club (RASC) asked us to provide a letter of endorsement for RASC’s efforts to add infrastructure to support winter action sports at the park because they knew we have extensive experience adding this type of infrastructure to similar projects in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois. They needed our letter to secure the City of Rochester’s backing to pursue funds for this infrastructure from Minnesota’s Destination Medical Center funding program for Rochester. Our preliminary investigations of the park found that the proximity to the City of Rochester and its population is key to the Park’s success. Besides becoming a regional cross-country skiing asset, a lit trail network featuring dependable machine made snow will provide a good venue for area high school and collegiate teams to conduct both practices and competitions. We found that the infrastructure installed for winter action sports would likely not interfere with summer action sports in the Park. Our endorsement was contingent upon the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources allowing the use of water from the pool behind its dam for snowmaking and the installation of infrastructure to support action sports in the vicinity of both its dam and the dam’s emergency overflow structure. Our letter of endorsement addressed snowmaking, cross-country skiing trail network, tubing/downhill terrain park area, day use building/multi-purpose area, parking/entrance road, off-site improvements, and non-winter action sports. 23SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Somerset, Wis. Completed a study adding snowmaking and area lighting to an existing driving range at the golf course to convert it to a snow tubing area at an estimated cost of $0.5 million. The study featured adding mechanical and electrical systems to a 5.0 acre driving range to allow for snowmaking activities. Project components studied included studying combination intake pipe/booster pump from an existing golf course water feature fed by an existing golf course well, implications of making snow using water from the existing golf course well, snowmaking pump skid, 1,500 feet of steel pipe connected to 8 snowmaking hydrants, and a cast-in-place foundation for a combination pump skid/house. Snowmaking Study (St. Croix National Golf and Event Center) Reference: Saint Croix National Golf and Event Center Doug Hoskin 607 Washington Avenue South, Suite 207 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.940.0686 Year Completed: 2010 to Present Completed feasibility study, bid document, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for civil site improvements and mechanical and electrical equipment for this $4.2 million project. The project featured the addition of mechanical and electrical systems along five km of existing cross-country ski trails allowing for snowmaking activities to occur along these trails. Mechanical and electrical systems were also added to 2.9 acres of hillside for snowmaking activities on an existing sledding area. Project components included the construction of an intake pipe from Hyland Lake for water used to make snow, reconstruction of an existing boat ramp adjacent to the proposed intake pipe, snowmaking pump skid, 11,900 feet of steel pipe connected to 42 snowmaking hydrants, cast-in-place concrete wet well and foundation for the pump skid and its wood framed pump house, reconstruction of the existing cross-country ski trail lighting system, tree clearing plan to make room for the snowmaking pipe network, public meetings with adjacent property owners, noise impact studies, and a restoration plan for park areas disturbed by construction. Snowmaking and Lighted Trail Development for Cross-Country Skiing at Hyland Lake Park Reserve Bloomington, Minn. Reference: Three Rivers Park District Eric Nelson, PE – Project Engineer 3000 Xenium Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 763.694.2060 Year Completed: 2014 24SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Hickory Hills, Mich. In 2013, RRC prepared a market assessment report for Hickory Hills ski area in Michigan. The area is owned by the City of Traverse City and Garfield Township, and operated by the Grand Traverse Ski Club. The market assessment report defined visitor trends and volumes, local and regional market demographic profiles, and a broad analysis of existing regional amenities and attractions in the Northwest Michigan area. The report and research was intended to serve as a framework for discussions to assist Hickory Hills and City of Traverse City management team in making strategic decisions regarding the opportunities and barriers for the success of four-season recreation at Hickory Hills. Findings included a significant potential for summer activities and recreation, but also competition for both summer and winter visitor business. Market Assessment (City of Traverse City and Garfield Township) Reference: Dave Green, Department of Public Services City of Traverse City 231.922.4900 Year Completed: 2013 Bloomington, Minn. RRC conducted a market assessment in 2010 to investigate the potential for additional amenities and activities at the urban recreation area, including summer skiing on an artificial slope surface. The report documented some of the opportunities and challenges regarding its future as a four-season mountain recreation area, particularly within the context of its suburban location and as part of a larger public park district. The research and recommendations were inclusive of a greater diversity of the metro area population, more group events, corporate team building activities, health and wellness, and providing year-round action and gravity-based adventures. Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area (Three Rivers Park District)Reference: Fred Seymour Senior Manager Alpine Services 763.694.7805 Year Completed: 2010 25SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Provided schematic-level investigations, sketches, and estimates of construction and operating costs for snow tubing and snowboarding, possible water sources for snowmaking operations, scope of slope-side operations, locations for parking lots, electrical needs, slope lighting, and geotechnical investigations. In addition, identified the impacts of construction and winter operations on nearby neighborhoods, and the likelihood of unearthing Native American and Civil War artifacts. Winter Recreation Area Operations, Dellwood Park Lockport, Ill. Reference: Lockport Township Park District Dave Herman, Director of Recreation 1911 South Lawrence Avenue Lockport, IL 60441 815.838.1183 x204 Year Completed: 2009 Osseo, Minn. Coordinated design meetings with Park District staff, assisted with informational meetings for the Park District Board and its residential neighbors; prepared plans, specifications, cost estimate for civil site improvements and mechanical and electrical equipment; provided bidding assistance; provided construction administration, observation, and staking; and provide project management during the construction of this $1.2 million project. The project featured the addition of mechanical and electrical systems along 2.6 km of existing cross-country ski trails allowing for snowmaking activities to occur along these trails. Mechanical and electrical systems were also added to nine acres of hillside for snowmaking activities on a snow tubing and snowboard and downhill ski area. Project components included the construction of a 4.1 million gallon clay-lined reservoir to store water used to make snow, regrading a nine-acre hillside for downhill skiing, snowboarding, and snow tubing activities, snowmaking pump skid, 8,500 feet of steel pipe connected to 32 snowmaking hydrants, cast- in-place concrete wet well and foundation for the pump skid and its wood framed pump house, reconstruction of the existing cross-country ski trail lighting system, reconstruction of an 89-stall bituminous parking lot, stormwater runoff detention basin, tree clearing plan to make room for the snowmaking pipe network, realignment of 1,200 feet of 10-foot wide bituminous bicycle trail, and a restoration plan for park areas disturbed by construction. The team also prepared plans, specifications, and cost estimates for a $2.9 million, two-story 8,300 square foot slope side chalet/visitor center. The visitor center supports year-round visits by patrons using the park’s extensive paved trail system, play structure, parking lots, picnic areas, filtered swim-pond, cross-country and downhill skiing, snowboarding, and snow tubing. The team prepared plans, specifications, and cost estimates for the construction of a $2 million, two-story 11,800 sq. ft. office and maintenance area space that supports year-round park maintenance activities on an extensive paved trail system, play structure, parking lots, visitor centers, picnic areas, filtered swim-pond, snow-making activities for cross-country and downhill skiing, and snow tubing. Elm Creek Park Reserve Winter Recreation Area, Rope Tow, Chalet, and Maintenance Facility (Three Rivers Park District) Reference: Three Rivers Park District Mike Horn, Project Architect 3000 Xenium Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 763.559.6760 Year Completed: 2003- Present U Sustainable buildings, sound infrastructure, safe transportation systems, clean water, renewable energy and a balanced environment. Building a Better World for All of Us communicates a company-wide commitment to act in the best interests of our clients and the world around us. We’re confident in our ability to balance these requirements. Proposed Winter Recreation Area Braemar Park April 12, 2016 Braemar Park – Winter Recreation Opportunity •Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Renovation – 27 to 18 holes •2.5k loop with 30% beginner, 20% intermediate, 50% advanced trails •10 – 12 snow tubing lanes with tows •Expand on current offerings •- Natural snow cross country skiing, snow shoeing, sledding, skijoring, walking and dog walking •- 2.89 miles of groomed multi-use trails www.EdinaMN.gov 2 Winter Recreation Opportunity •Partner with Edina High School - Nine Mile Creek Trail and high school construction - Clubhouse – new home for high school cross country skiing - Host cross country practices and competition •Fat tire biking •Biathlon •Summer recreation – trails, zip line, mountain biking, scenic overlook www.EdinaMN.gov 3 www.EdinaMN.gov 4 •May require 50’ wide path through woods on hill •Water mains and electrical run up center Potential Trail Areas www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Consulting Team •SEH – Paul Pasko, Project Manager •- Civil engineering, environmental, electrical, trail design, snowmaking •Morton Trails – Trail design •RRC Associates – Operational feasibility •Torrent Engineering and Equipment and HDR Engineering – snowmaking engineering and noise impact studies www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Current Conditions www.EdinaMN.gov 7 www.EdinaMN.gov 8 www.EdinaMN.gov 9 www.EdinaMN.gov 10 www.EdinaMN.gov 11 www.EdinaMN.gov 12 Man Made Snow In Metro •5K man made snow trails at Hyland (Bloomington) - $5 million •2.5K man made snow trails at Elm Creek (Maple Grove – 30 miles) •2K proposed at Wirth Adventure Area - Currently they try to make 2.5 – 3K – similar to Edina HS •2.5K proposed but unfunded at Battle Creek in Ramsey County - $4 million www.EdinaMN.gov 13 Competitive Rates – Three Rivers Park District •Tubing $15 for 2 hours •Cross Country Skiing $8/day $65 season pass $32.50 each additional www.EdinaMN.gov 14 Potential Project Timeline •Park Board Review and Comment April 2016 •City Council Presentation May 2016 •Hire Design and Consulting Team May 2016 •Feasibility and Design May - June 2016 •City Council Feasibility Study Check In June 7, 2016 •Open House June 2016 •Park Board Review July 12, 2016 •City Council Presentation/Bid Authorization August 2, 2016 •Bid Project August 2016 •Bid Award September 20, 2016 •Construction Winter 2016 – Fall 2017 •Open December 2017 www.EdinaMN.gov 15 Project Strengths •Clubhouse and parking lot •Tin Fish •City owned well •Golf course design and construction occurring simultaneously •Staffing efficiencies – snowmaking, grooming, administration •Significant winter recreation opportunity for residents •- Lights would extend hours of utilization •Equipment rental opportunity •Huge Nordic ski program at the high school www.EdinaMN.gov 16 Project Challenges •Timeline •- Fast track •- Financial Risk – Operational and trail feasibility •- Lack of funding source for study if cancelled •Neighbors •- Traffic, noise, lights, snow over spray •Tree loss on hill •Avoid golf playing surfaces www.EdinaMN.gov 17 Project Funding •Bond sale later this year • - Golf, Aquatic Center - Weber Woods, Braemar Winter Recreation •2017 Tax Impact of $3 million - $360,000 or 1.5% tax increase on 4.9% in 2016-2017 Budget www.EdinaMN.gov 18 Snowmaking www.EdinaMN.gov 19 Tubing & Skiing www.EdinaMN.gov 20 www.EdinaMN.gov 21 •2.5K trail and snow tubing - $3 million •- Cost include engineering and trail design, feasibility study, bid documents, construction observation and equipment •SEH Fee Summary •Feasibility study * $138,131 •Bid document & bidding assistance $192,146 •Total $330,277 * Study feasibility of site for cross country ski trails and snow tubing * Study financial feasibility for operations * Study impacts to neighborhood in terms of noise, light and snow overspray Proposal Summary www.EdinaMN.gov 22 •Approve a motion to begin the feasibility study for the financial feasibility and trail design for a snow tubing and cross country skiing operation at Braemar Park. •Approve the Agreement with the SEH team to proceed with the financial feasibility study and trail design. Staff Request www.EdinaMN.gov 23 Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 24 Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2016-46 Accepting Various Donations & Grants Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2016-46 Approving Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2016-46 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Parks & Recreation Jill Pavlak $350.00 Memorial Tree Donation - Crabapple Edina Police Department Triple A $2,000.00 High School Safe Driving Initiative Edina Public Works Department: Grafitti Control Services Removal of Grafitti Dated May 17, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 17, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Heather Branigin, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action required. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondence One 05.17.2016 Correspondence Two 05.17.2016 1 Heather Branigin From:Debra Lee <debraylee@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:41 PM To:Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Chad Millner Subject:Re: Townes Circle project Mayor Hovland I addressed you and the City Council a few months ago about the concern for the size of Townes Circle with the new roads. You asked Chad if there was something we could do to address the concerns about the size being shrunk substantially. He did inform me that 5ft was added and we would not lose parking which is in great demand since the driveway that goes to 4 homes provides no parking so the circle is very vital to us ( please see my previous letter attached about our neighborhood concerns) but since that time the marks have been drawn and the circle really is very small and we are losing a valuable asset to our neighborhood cul de sac which is also a meeting place for White Oaks picnics and a play area for our children. There was a meeting (I was under the weather and could not attend) last week with Chad and several other neighbors expressed their concern about the size‐ we do feel that our concerns are not being addressed. This is a big concern and we would appreciate it Mr Hovland if you could please meet with us in our cul de sac and see what we are concerned about!!! Besides practical concerns aesthetics are very important ‐ our cul de sac has very expensive houses and we are being assessed a very large amount and really need for it to look great!!! The way it is drawn the cul de sac looks like it is losing its shape!!! We would appreciate any consideration as we want this to be a project we feel we are behind and that enhances our neighborhood!!! Thank you ‐ Mayor Hovland I can be reached at 952‐239‐4166 Debbie Lee 4605 Townes Circle Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Debra Lee <debraylee@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you for your response Mrs Brindle ‐ personally we have at least 3/4 of an acre that is permeable as do most of my neighbors ‐ the footprint of our homes in this cul de sac have been relatively unchanged since the 1930's and 40's making our cul de sac lots unspoiled respecting the natural setting ‐ The other cul de sac lot in White Oaks has been called tight by those who visit there so we would appreciate any consideration for keeping out size of circle as close as possible‐ thank you for your help!! It is truly appreciated!!! > Debbie Lee > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Dec 9, 2015, at 10:22 AM, "Mary Brindle" <mbrindle@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> Good morning, >> Thank you for your email message, below. >> >> It is with intent that the street reconstruction hearings are held in December in order to put these projects out for bid as soon as possible. >> The size of the culdesac is recommended for a variety of reasons including reducing the size of the impermeable pavement surface. >> More discussion is possible and likely. >> No promises. I am more than willing to ask the question to get some feedback as to solutions. >> Mary Brindle. >> >> _______________________________ 2 >> Mary Brindle >> mbrindle@comcast.net >> 612‐270‐9887 call or text >> >> ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Edina Mail >> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 10:02 AM >> To: Carter Schulze >> Subject: FW: Townes Circle project >> >> Good morning, >> >> This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Carter Schulze. >> >> Lynette Biunno, Receptionist >> 952‐927‐8861 | Fax 952‐826‐0389 >> lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, >> Raising Families & Doing Business ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ >> From: Debra Lee [mailto:debraylee@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 9:46 AM >> To: Edina Mail >> Subject: Townes Circle project >> >> Thank you for your time last night!! We have been residents for >> almost 30 years and love the wonderful life Edina has provided for us >> and our children ‐ we have the most wonderful public services >> departments and we are so thankful!!! That said my husband and I >> would just like to reiterate our concern for the size of the >> assessment and concern for the size of the cul de sac which has been >> a gathering spot for neighbors and White Oaks Association picnics‐ >> currently the cul de sac only provides for 6 parking spaces so if >> Chad says we are going to lose a few parking spaces that is a big >> impact on us!!! More importantly the circle provides a safe spot for >> our children to play but with 8 homes using the circle ‐ picture 3 >> lawn services with big tractors or 2‐3 garbage trucks and recycling >> plus other Fed ex the postal service and everyday maintenance people >> the cul de sac fills up as coming up the private drive is difficult >> for most trucks‐ so they is a lot of action in the cul de sac so in >> order for residents to safely leave their homes snd not have their >> entrances blocked it is very important to keep the size and parking >> spaces available‐ please reconsider ‐ from our view it looks like the >> assessment is almost twice other assessments and the circle is going >> to be smaller ‐ no added lighting‐ very dark on Townes Rd from circle >> to Sunnyside and the city is no longer going to take care of the >> private drive which we would gladly deed over to the city‐ all of our >> neighbors treasure our green space and wooded areas ‐ we even have an >> undeveloped lot to the east of us ‐ we have been a walking area for >> all the neighbors who enjoy the marsh and woods and an occasional >> stroll up the private drive is please sometimes change us just change >> and does not improve ‐thank you for your time‐ I know that you really >> are seeking the best solutions snd we appreciate your work ‐ have a >> great day!!! Debbie and George Lee >> 3 >> Sent from my iPhone May 11, 2016 City of Edina RE: Sidewalk on Woodland Rd W. Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, I am writing to ask you to approve adding the sidewalk project on Woodland Rd West back into the scope of this summer’s roadway construction project. Realizing that it is pretty late in the game, I want you to know there has been much confusion about the sidewalk project among residents on Woodland Rd West. Please give strong consideration to approving sidewalks on Woodland Rd West for the following reasons: 1. The City recommended Woodland Rd W for sidewalks for a valid reason. Quantitative data shows that Woodland receives the highest foot traffic of any street in the neighborhood. 2. The interest survey does not reflect the intentions of the majority of residents - the sidewalk question was asked without giving any context related to street width, placement & lot implications. 3. We want sidewalks! - 88% of Woodland Rd W residents want a sidewalk – as documented on the recent petition submitted to the city. 4. 40+ kids live on Woodland Rd West between Wooddale Dr and Concord Ave. These are YOUNG kids who need sidewalks for SAFETY. Having that many young children in a concentrated area with no sidewalks poses a safety risk. Kids have to walk, bike, scooter in the street to get anywhere. 5. Woodland Road West kids do NOT qualify for the bus for the neighborhood schools (Concord and Southview) due to proximity. As a result, kids are walking to school (in the streets) every day. Sidewalks are needed to ensure their safety. 6. Woodland Rd West is a “Main Vein”- many kids from outside our neighborhood use our street to get to and from school. Sidewalks would also benefit people from adjacent neighborhoods who utilize our street as a passageway to and from school, football games, activities at the athletic fields, etc. 7. Woodland Rd W is a major cut through street for vehicles. That coupled with the high concentration of young children increases the safety risk. Cars are zipping down our street cutting through to get to Highway 100, one of the 4 nearby schools, West Edina or Downtown Edina. We are a cut through with lots of children in the streets. Not Safe. I have personally witnessed several close calls on our street involving vehicles and young children. At it’s core, the sidewalk debate is really about SAFETY. Safety for the children, adults, and drivers on Woodland Rd W. Sidewalks will benefit both pedestrians and drivers. I appreciate your service as Mayor and the role you play in shaping our city. I know it is inconvenient to add the sidewalks back in at this point, but at the end of the day, it is the right thing to do. The city recommends it, residents want it, and there are benefits to doing it during the roadway construction project. I urge you to please do what’s right versus what is easy. Thank you in advance for your careful consideration and responsiveness on this issue. Sincerely, Traci Mercado 4609 Woodland Rd W, Edina, MN 555424 612-396-7661 tracimercado@yahoo.com 4 Heather Branigin From:Traci Mercado <tracimercado@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:32 PM To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1 @gmail.com Subject:Please Review Attachments:sidewalks - city council letter 5-11-16.docx Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, I am writing to ask you to approve adding the sidewalk project on Woodland Rd West back into the scope of this summer’s roadway project. Realizing that it is pretty late in the game, I want you to know there has been much confusion about the sidewalk project among residents on Woodland Rd West. Please give strong consideration to approving sidewalks on Woodland Rd West for the following reasons: 1. The City recommended Woodland Rd W for sidewalks for a valid reason. Quantitative data shows that Woodland receives the highest foot traffic of any street in the neighborhood. 2. The interest survey does not reflect the intentions of the majority of residents - the sidewalk question was asked without giving any context related to street width, placement & lot implications. 3. We want sidewalks! - 88% of Woodland Rd W residents want a sidewalk – as documented on the recent petition submitted to the city. 4. 40+ kids live on Woodland Rd West between Wooddale Dr and Concord Ave. These are YOUNG kids who need sidewalks for SAFETY. Having that many young children in a concentrated area with no sidewalks poses a safety risk. Kids have to walk, bike, scooter in the street to get anywhere. 5. Woodland Road West kids do NOT qualify for the bus for the neighborhood schools (Concord and Southview) due to proximity. As a result, kids are walking to school (in the streets) every day. Sidewalks are needed to ensure their safety. 6. Woodland Rd West is a “Main Vein”- many kids from outside our neighborhood use our street to get to and from school. Sidewalks would also benefit people from adjacent neighborhoods who utilize our street as a passageway to and from school, football games, activities at the athletic fields, etc. 7. Woodland Rd W is a major cut through street for vehicles. That coupled with the high concentration of young children increases the safety risk. Cars are zipping down our street cutting through to get to Highway 100, one of the 4 nearby schools, West Edina or Downtown Edina. We are a cut through with lots of children in the streets. Not Safe. I have personally witnessed several close calls on our street involving vehicles and young children. At it’s core, the sidewalk debate is really about SAFETY. Safety for the children, adults, and drivers on Woodland Rd W. Sidewalks will benefit both pedestrians and drivers. I appreciate your service on the City Council and the role you play in shaping our city. I know it is inconvenient to add the sidewalks back in at this point, but at the end of the day, it is the right thing to do. The city recommends it, residents want it, and there are benefits to doing it during the roadway construction project. I urge you to please do what’s right versus what is easy. Thank you in advance for your careful consideration and responsiveness on this issue. Sincerely, Traci Mercado 4609 Woodland Rd W, Edina, MN 555424 612-396-7661 5 tracimercado@yahoo.com 6 Heather Branigin From:Josh Lieber <joshlieber@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:27 AM To:superintendent@edinaschools.org; James Hovland; susan.brott@edinaschools.org Subject:Former Edina Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Ralph Lieber 5/11/16 Dear Dr. Dressen, Mayor Hovland, and Ms. Brott: Thank you for taking a moment to read this note. A seed of an idea recently embedded in my mind and I wanted to share that with you, to gain your insight and to see what steps we might take to make it blossom into something really great. My father, Dr. Ralph Lieber, was Superintendent of the Edina schools from 1971-1986, a period of time that saw a tremendous surge in the statewide and national prominence of the district. For his efforts, Dr. Lieber was recognized as one of the top 100 educators in the United States, as well as a plethora of other awards and accolades. Most importantly, he took an already good system and skyrocketed matriculation rates to some of the nation’s highest levels — again, solidifying Edina as the educational gold standard for K-12. Likewise, the number of graduates who have moved back to the district to provide their children with the same public school excellence is a testament to what he began and what you have dynamically and creatively expanded upon. Wouldn’t it be great if we could honor Dr. Lieber’s service to Edina and the countless graduates and parents who shared in such an ambitious and successful time? This would be a meaningful way to link the past with the present — to demonstrate the unwavering and uninterrupted continuance of education excellence found in this utterly special district. I propose that we find some sort of naming convention that honors the legacy that Dr. Lieber left behind. Perhaps a road at the school is named after him*, or a building or running track, or maybe something as simple as a plaque adorning the entrance way to the high school. Perhaps it’s a less physically tangible thing, such as parent-teacher initiative. Or (as we love to do here in Los Angeles ), a walk of fame, which could also honor many other administrators and teachers. Admittedly, I haven’t been in the high school in many years, so you may already have something like this? 7 Please let me know your thoughts and what steps I might take to take this to reality. My father knows nothing of this effort, but it would be such a great and lasting surprise to a leading educator who gave so much to the public good — and who saw his children and grandchildren benefit by his passion to make Edina schools great. Much thanks! Josh Lieber joshlieber@gmail.com 310.936.7188 Edina HS class of ‘82 *For precedence, I refer to the former Edina East H.S., whose road was named after long-time principal, Rollie Ring (“Ring Road”). 8 Heather Branigin From:jerryclare@aol.com Sent:Wednesday, May 11, 2016 10:20 AM To:James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1 @gmail.com Subject:Sidewalks on West Woodland Road It is time for sidewalks on West Woodland Road, both for us old folks who like to go out for a walk now and then and the children attending the schools nearby. The road is ripped up and we are putting up with the discomfort of mud, dust, etc. Why not finish the job properly now instead of later. Makes sense to me Clara H. Madsen 9 Heather Branigin From:Jackie Olson <jackie.olson@me.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 10:38 PM To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1 @gmail.com Cc:Carter Schulze; Chad Millner Subject:Petition Dear City Council: Thank you for your thoughtfulness in reading our resident comments for the upcoming agenda item for sidewalks on Woodland Rd W. I circulated the petition resulting in 88% signing (2 opposed and 1 was more worried about drainage than sidewalks and couldn’t be bothered to give it thought) This was submitted to Debra Mangen last Monday, May 2nd.. I have a 6th grader at Valley View (she walked to Normandale with a girl from Concord Terrace), a disabled 11th grader (who I drove to SVMS because it wasn’t safe for him to walk) and a freshman in college who walked (ran!) to Concord and Southview (pic attached so you could see who we are). I am passionate about this because this is the right thing at the right time and I feel like the process resulted in us, the street with highest pedestrian traffic, not slated for sidewalks. I’m sure you know the facts but I will highlight: We have the most pedestrian traffic of the 3 streets surveyed The west corner of Woodland/Concord which has a crosswalk right into Southview is an incredibly dangerous intersection. Driving west on Woodland towards that corner creates a blind intersection because of the retaining wall yard on the north side. Its an accident waiting to happen. Before making any decisions I would encourage you to drive west on woodland and take note of the dangerous obstructed views there. I personally have had several close calls with other cars, which could push an accident into the heavy pedestrian traffic any day. No trees or plantings would be affected by installing sidewalks. Residents on the north side of the street are losing 4 feet for “future sidewalks” - You may have heard Woodland residents were “not supportive” of sidewalks. The reality is that residents didn’t have complete information to make and informed decision. Several who were originally opposed, are now enthusiastic supporters when they received complete information about balancing the sidewalks to both sides and narrowing street. It was suggested that with sidewalks on 58th and Tower, kids might find a safer sidewalk route to school. Knowing the street, the angle of St. Johns/Fairfax and the location of the schools I thinks this in an extraordinarily unlikely scenario. In addition to the obvious safety concerns please consider the following: Many residents are livid at the thought of losing 4 feet of yard for “future” sidewalks. Yes, the City of Edina will call this the right of way - but thinking about it logically, streets on the north side now have smaller lots from a property value and lot size standpoint. (curb to back property line) I hear repeatedly from residents: Either put the sidewalks in and move the street or leave the street as is. It seems 10 nonsensical to us to move the street and not put them in. One even said its like using eminent domain to take a house to build a freeway but not build the freeway Most significant to many of us, which is probably confusing to City Council and the engineers as you live this process everyday, is that the process was really confusing to us. Most of us (with the exception of the strong voice against sidewalks) were extremely confused there was democratic process available to us. We heard “staff recommendation” was Woodland Rd W for sidewalks and thought it was a done deal. Then we got a letter saying sidewalks were moved to 56th and thought THAT was a done deal. It wasn’t until the Tower street petition was passed 2 weeks ago the we dug into the process and options available for us to speak our unified voice. I am confused by some early responses some council members gave to neighbors that there are not funds. 3 weeks ago the Tower amount needed was “small”, and with our easier project there are no funds?? After listening to the discussion about Tower sidewalks on the April 19th meeting online, please allow me to review some of your comments: Carter Schultze - "With the little demand we’ve had in the past, this trend of wanting sidewalks is greatly appreciated and aligns directly with our Living Streets initiative” … then also said the Tower monies (80k) “not a huge amount of our PACS” . He also said the engineering time spent reworking was his biggest concern. (This shouldn’t be as big of concern of Woodland because of our future sidewalk status) - Member Stauton - “I really like the idea of being responsive to folks who are standing up and saying they want sidewalks” (and then went on to recognize the potential impact on other sidewalks and encouraged discussion” - Member Swenson - (After jokingly moving for a vote before discussion obviously due to her strong enthusiasm for Tower) "I agree with you the PACS money has a limit, but I think this is a neighborhood that has supported it and as we’ve learned from putting sidewalks in other places with alot of grief, this is rather refreshing. We tried to put in sidewalks in a short area of Juanita last year and Arden and Bruce and only got one……..I don’t see this as too many in one place because we actually tried to do that at the 50th construction project.” (Then she went on to suggest that sidewalk conversations should be clarified in early conversations with residents - which we wholeheartedly agree with!) - Member Brindle - “We’ve seen a real change in the acceptance of sidewalks, which I believe has a lot to do with the fact that we don’t assess sidewalks as part of property taxes any longer. I think we should celebrate it, and we have an opportunity here and I support it. I am sensitive to what it does to the rest of the schedule but it is the right time to do this because this is when the crews are in there that can do it as part of the rest of the project so it just makes sense. - Mayor Hovland - "It strikes me as strange that this wasn’t done when this whole subdivision was built years and years ago because it seems to be a perfect neighborhood for sidewalks when you think about trying to move from Wooddale to Concord over to the school. I have friends that live on Tower and was always struck that you had to walk on the street. Even though we’ve done something on 56th and the general rule was that this wasn’t in sequence, as lawyers we know that for every general rule there is an exception . The opportunity is ripe, we have willing residents, and we should use the PACS fund monies to build this sidewalk. We should talk about those projects like Valley View that really do stress our engineering capabilities when you are trying to do something and retro fit it in outside the context of a street project... - Scott Neal (outlining the PACS fund report) - What you’ll see from 2014 to 2015 is similar to what you’ll see from 2015 to 2016: we roll over a lot of money from one year to the next. It was $740k from 2014 to 2015 and 11 $720 from 2015 to 2016 The bigger challenge we have is having enough people to design these projects and get them on the ground. … then asking Carter the total cost of the project who replied $80k on the high side …”from a from a material financial impact its probably going to be closer to minimal but in terms of staff and how they are deployed that is the bigger concern. I’m appealing to your common sense - don’t punish us, our kids and the others who cut through our feeder street to the schools and community center because we didn’t have a full understanding of the process. Pass this one with the same enthusiasm as Tower and improve the process for streets under construction going forward, learning from the experience in our neighborhood. Thank you all for your dedication and commitment to our Living Streets City!! I know it can be a thankless job sometime but do appreciate your dedication. Several of us would welcome the opportunity to speak with any or all of you in person if time allows before Tuesday. Jackie and Geoffrey Olson 4620 Woodland Rd W jackie.olson@me.com 952-221-6391 12 Heather Branigin From:Kathleen Loftus <kaljml@comcast.net> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:34 PM To:James Hovland Subject:EGC Spring Luncheon Invitation Attachments:Luncheon_Invite_2016.pdf Kathleen Loftus kaljml@comcast.net 612-929-3561 home 612-790-0637 cell Come to hear the owner of Arts and Flowers from St. Louis Park, followed by salad and dessert hosted by the five Edina Garden Clubs: Hidden Valley, Kelodale, Late Bloomers, Normandale, and Winahbar. Each club is responsible for two large salads and two dozen cookies or bars. Hidden Valley--two meat/seafood salads Kelodale--one fruit salad and one green salad Late Bloomers--one fruit salad and one meat salad Normandale--two meat/seafood salads Winahbar--one meat/seafood salad and one green salad You are invited to EGC Spring Garden Luncheon June 6, 2016 Program 11:00 AM Lunch 12:00 PM Arneson Acres Park 13 Heather Branigin From:jjtangeman@aol.com Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 5:54 PM To:James Hovland Subject:Crumb rubber concerns Hello. I have never written an email like this before but feel strongly now is the right time. I have a 4th grade son at Highlands Elementary who has been involved in youth sports and spent many hours at the various parks in our city. I am asking that you take a more cautious approach with the use of crumb rubber in our parks until the EPA is definitive that it is not a harmful material. The EPA says “existing studies do not comprehensively evaluate the concerns about health risks from exposure to tire crumb.” Preliminary results from a comprehensive federal study are expected by year-end. https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/federal-research-recycled-tire-crumbs-used-playing-fields. Something just isn't right with this situation and I ask that you either delay replacing surfaces until the EPA findings become available or use an alternative, proven safe solution. Thank you - Julia Tangeman 4508 Vandervork Avenue Edina, MN 55436 14 Heather Branigin From:Kandy Branch <KBranch@blackwellburke.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 4:41 PM To:James Hovland Subject:You're Invited! Peacehaven Farm Peace Pole Dedication Ceremony - June 5, 2016 Attachments:Peacehaven Peace Pole Dedication Ceremony Invitation.pdf Please see the attached invitation from Mr. Blackwell. Thank you. This message and any attachments may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or are not authorized to receive for the recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you. 1 Invitation to Peace Pole Dedication Ceremony Over 200,000 Peace Poles have been installed all over the world! “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be known as the Children of God.” Bible, Matthew 5:9 “And make not Allah an obstacle to your doing good and guarding against evil and making peace between men.” Koran, al-Baqarah 2:224 “May Your children unite and do Your will: to establish peace and justice throughout the world, so that nations are drawn together by the bond of friendship.” Jewish Prayer Book “There can never be peace between nations until it is first known that true peace lies within the souls of us all.” Native American Lakota Proverb PEACEHAVEN PEACE POLE DEDICATION DATE/TIME: Sunday, June 5 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. LOCATION: 21176 Sawmill Road, Jordan MN JOINING US • MN Attorney General, Lori Swanson • Jordan Mayor, Tanya Velishek • Beacon Hill Brass Quintet • Duniya Drum & Dance (African Dance) • Hmong Peace Dancers 2 Peacehaven Farm Peace Pole Dedication Ceremony June 5, 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. Peacehaven Farm, 21176 Sawmill Road, Jordan MN 1:30 to 3:00 Music and Dance – Unity in the Art of Soul Expression • Brian Boru Pipe Band • Beacon Hill Brass Quintet • Duniya Drum & Dance (African Drum and Dance Troupe) • Hmong Peace Dancers 3:00 to 3:30 Remarks • Welcome and Introduction to Peacehaven Farm– Jerry W. Blackwell • What is the Peace Pole and Why It Matters? • A Peace Pole Message of Hope – Attorney General Lori Swanson • A Peace Pole Message of Inspiration for Jordan – Tanya Velishek, Mayor of Jordan 3:30 to 4:00 Reading of Peace Messages – Many Languages, Many Faiths, One People, One Spirit • Reading “May Peace Prevail on Earth” in Dakota, English, Spanish, Hebrew, Hmong, Arabic • Blessings by Ministers of various Faiths Closing • Release of Helium Balloons • Refreshments and additional cultural performances 3 What Is a Peace Pole? A Peace Pole is an internationally recognized symbol that displays the message "May Peace Prevail on Earth,” usually in a different language on each side of the pole. The Peace Pole project was started in Japan by Masahisa Goi (1916-1980) who was greatly affected by the destruction caused by World War II and the atomic bombs that struck the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Peace Pole Project was started in Japan by The World Peace Prayer Society in 1955, and was introduced into the United States in 1986. The Peace Pole is now the most recognized international peace symbol with more than 200,000 peace poles standing in 180 countries. When you plant a Peace Pole in your community, you are linking with people all over the world who have planted Peace Poles in the same spirit of peace. Every Peace Pole proclaims the prayer May Peace Prevail on Earth in the language of the country and often other languages. Peacehaven Farm has chosen the languages of: Dakota, English, Hebrew, Spanish, Hmong, and Arabic. The planting of the Peace Pole is intended to highlight and remind us that world peace is only obtainable through the cultivation of inner peace. The Peace Pole symbolizes the Peacehaven mission to add more love to the world and to link us with the people around the world who are striving for a better place by creating a network of peace. Let each of us be inspired to bring peace to our hearts and our world by our daily actions. Ceremony: Peacehaven Farm, 21176 Sawmill Road, Jordan Sunday, June 5, 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. 15 Heather Branigin From:Kollodge, Bonnie <bonnie.kollodge@metc.state.mn.us> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:40 PM To:James Hovland; James Hovland Subject:FW: Hovland draft quote--for your review and approval Checking in…. hoping to get your review and approval of, or edits to a quote for a Met Council newsletter story about the Regional Solicitation. Thanks! Bonnie From: Kollodge, Bonnie Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 2:24 PM To: James Hovland <jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com> Subject: Hovland draft quote‐‐for your review and approval Hi Mayor, I’m writing for the Met Council newsletter about the impending release of the Regional Solicitation (in mid‐May). I hoped to include a quote from you, which I’ve drafted and you are free to revise. In the draft, I describe the role of TAB in soliciting, reviewing and selecting projects for funding…and then the projects are included in the TIP for Council adoption…. And then you say: “It’s a fair and orderly process that, with some adjustments and modifications over the years, serves communities and the region well,” said TAB Chair Jim Hovland. “The process engages stakeholders from across the region‐‐elected officials, citizen representatives, and representatives of state agencies, including the state Department of Transportation—in the award of increasingly scarce transportation dollars.” Work for you? Not urgent. We have some time … Thanks! Bonnie Bonnie Kollodge Communications Bonnie.Kollodge@metc.state.mn.us P. 651.602.1357 390 North Robert Street | St. Paul, MN | 55101 | metrocouncil.org 16 Heather Branigin From:Hennepin County Human Resources <county.communications@hennepin.us> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:28 PM To:James Hovland Subject:Southdale Service Center Grand Opening Southdale Service Center Grand Opening Join us and celebrate Hennepin County's new Southdale Service Center at the Southdale Mall Monday, June 13 8:15 - 9 a.m. Event includes a short program followed by a ribbon cutting and photos. The Service Center opens for business to the general public at 9 a.m. Please RSVP in the gray box below by June 6 Southdale Mall 1225 Southdale Center, Edina Enter mall on the first floor between JCPenney and Herberger's 17 Parking is available in the mall parking lot. Service Center move details The Southdale Service Center is moving to the Southdale Mall from 7009 York Avenue South. The final day of service at the York Avenue location is scheduled to be May 21. The new Service Center is expected to open for business on Tuesday, May 31, pending construction schedule. This new location has ample free parking, is accessible via many bus routes and allows customers to take care of their needs at the service center while shopping, seeing a movie or dining at the mall. Click on the link below to RSVP: Yes, I can attend No, I can't make it 18 Hennepin County, 300 S. 6th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55487 SafeUnsubscribe™ jhovland@edinamn.gov Update Profile | About our service provider Sent by county.communications@hennepin.us in collaboration with Try it free today 19 Heather Branigin From:Christina Stattine <christina@stattine.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:02 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Fwd: Sidewalks on West Woodland Reasons for wanting sidewalks: 1. There are 40 kids who live on Woodland Rd West between Wooddale and Concord Drive. That's a a lot of kids in a concentrated area and they need a safe way to get around our neighborhood. Sidewalks are even more imperative if the street is narrowed as it's even more dangerous for kids to get around on this busy cut-through street. 2. Woodland Road West is too close to the neighborhood schools (Concord & South View) to qualify for the bus. None of the kids on our street qualify for the bus for our neighborhood schools. As a result, many kids who live on Woodland walk to school every day. Sidewalks are needed to ensure their safety. Kids are walking in the streets every day to and from school which is dangerous on a street as busy as Woodland. 3. Many kids walk up and down Woodland Rd West to get to school even though they don't live on our street. It's a "main vein" to the middle school and elementary school and I see tons of kids walking our street on a daily basis. Sidewalks would not only benefit residents of Woodland Rd, but also the many kids from neighboring streets that use our street as a passageway to and from school. 4. Woodland Road West is a cut through street and we have a high volume of cars flying down our road - every day (especially during rush hour) and including weekends. Since there are no sidewalks, kids are riding bikes, scooters, etc. in the street. This is very dangerous and I have personally witnessed several close calls. Most of the cars that drive down are street are not part of our neighborhood and they often don't have regard for it or the children living here. We are a cut through for people going to Highway 100, Benton, Vernon, OLG, Concord and South View. On any given day, you will find a neighbor shouting at cars to slow down as they are driving through without paying attention to the kids who must ride their bikes/scooters in the street to get anywhere. Sidewalks will benefit the kids and the drivers. Let me know if you need anything else, Traci Mercado- 20 Heather Branigin From:Christina Stattine <christina@stattine.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:01 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Fwd: Sidewalks on West Woodland Begin forwarded message: From: Christina Stattine <christina@stattine.com> Date: April 25, 2016 9:21:51 PM CDT To: Jackie Olson <jackie.olson@me.com> Subject: Fwd: Sidewalks on West Woodland Begin forwarded message: From: Katie H <kathryn.heigl@gmail.com> Date: April 21, 2016 11:03:15 PM CDT To: Christina Stattine <christina@stattine.com> Subject: Re: Sidewalks on West Woodland We NEED sidewalks on West Woodland. With so much through traffic, our kids need a safe place to walk. West Woodland runs directly into Southview middle school (and another sidewalk that leads to Concord). To be excluded from a sidewalk, especially when neighboring streets are getting them, is just crazy! Katie Heigl 21 Heather Branigin From:Christina Stattine <christina@stattine.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 12:00 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Fwd: sidewalks- West Woodland Begin forwarded message: From: Christina Stattine <christina@stattine.com> Date: April 25, 2016 9:19:07 PM CDT To: Jackie Olson <jackie.olson@me.com> Subject: Fwd: sidewalks Begin forwarded message: From: Janna Kieffer <janna.kieffer@gmail.com> Date: April 22, 2016 4:58:17 PM CDT To: christina@stattine.com Subject: sidewalks Hi Christina, Both Rick and I will sign the petition in support of a sidewalk on our side of the street. With the number of kids that use our street as their route to school in the morning, and two separate school start times during a busy neighborhood traffic time, I worry about the kids' safety. I am especially concerned about the safety of the kids from traffic driving east toward Wooddale in the mornings, because the glare from the sun can be blinding (especially during the fall). Janna Kieffer 22 Heather Branigin From:Christina Stattine <christina@stattine.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 10:13 AM To:James Hovland Subject:Sidewalks Hello Mayor Hovland, My name is Christina Stattine and my husband and I have three children. We have lived in the neighborhood for 12 years. We lived on Tower Street and years ago moved on West Woodland. We love this neighborhood. One of the problems that we have had for the past twelve years is the traffic. It is actually very dangerous! West Woodland is the cut through street that kids, parents and pretty much everyone uses. Often you will hear me yelling at cars to slow down and believe me this is not just kids! The amount of kids that walk on the street is crazy. We have all ages of children walking to school (Concord, Normandale, OLG, and Southview), walking to the activities at these schools after school, parents walking to pick up their children from school, parents walking to the community center for their classes, families going to sporting events at Kuhlman, etc. Needless to say there is a lot going on in that area that families use our street to get to where they are going. Not only are people using West Woodland to get the schools, people that live on the other other side of Highway 100 use our street to go to 50th and France or areas East of Wooddale. It is a busy street! Thank god we have a stop sign because I sit at my kitchen window and I am amazed at the speed these people drive on this street. My three children attend Concord and Southview school. We love living close to the school but that does not allow them to have bus access so they walk to school. I tell the kids to walk in the grass because these cars are easily distracted and I don't want them to get hurt. I cannot stress enough of how important sidewalks are on this street. It is a safety issue and majority of the neighbors feel this way. It is not just our street that will use them it is all the kids, parents, adults that walk to these schools/community center that will benefit. As a parent if we were able to get sidewalks I would feel safe for my youngest to walk to school with her friends or walk to a neighbors for a playdate. There are over 90 kids on Tower, West Woodland and Fairfax, we are so fortunate to have this but they all use our street to get places. Please consider sidewalks! If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, Chriistina 23 Heather Branigin From:Jackie Olson <jackie.olson@me.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 8:17 AM To:James Hovland Cc:Steve and Janet Lerch; Kelly Sanderson; Geoffrey R Olson Subject:Meeting request Good Morning Mayor Hovland: A few residents of Woodland Rd W would like to meet with you in person before the Council Meeting on Tuesday. I think you’ll be interested to hear an explanation of the late petition from our residents. We are all available Monday ‐ but also could be available this weekend if that suits you better. Thank you so much for your commitment to our city! Jackie and Geoffrey Olson 4620 Woodland Rd W 24 Heather Branigin From:Timothy Hunter Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2016 6:29 AM To:'Deena Allen' Cc:ncjohnson88@comcast.net; James Hovland; Heather Branigin; Fred Falk; betsrobinson@msn.com Subject:RE: Wild Turkey Problem As I receive updates from USDA I will forward them to you, although I suspect you will receive updates directly from them if they are conducting removal efforts on your property. They did let me know they should be able to get on property early this week and look at the situation. The resident and USDA agreed to suspend the removal project involved in the previous permit, therefore no turkeys were removed. The City was not directly involved in that removal project beyond facilitating the permits from the MN‐ DNR and placing the resident and the USDA in contact with one another. I would also like to take this opportunity to advise you that as a private property owner, you have the right to contract with any properly licensed and permitted pest removal company to remove nuisance wildlife from your property. This is a right any property owner retains regardless of whether the City deems a particular to rise to a level that warrants the City to step in and facilitate the removal. Timothy Hunter, Animal Control Officer 952-826-0494 | Fax 952-826-1607 THunter@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Police Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. From: Deena Allen [mailto:deena.allen@ymail.com] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 12:28 PM To: Timothy Hunter Cc: ncjohnson88@comcast.net; James Hovland; Heather Branigin; Fred Falk; betsrobinson@msn.com Subject: Re: Wild Turkey Problem Dear Tim, Thank you for your focus on this issue. If you would provide us updates on the progress of actions that are occurring that would be helpful. Those of us on our pond at Schaefer and Interlachen have daily knowledge of turkey behavior including where they nest, what time they go into trees to sleep, what time they wake and start moving, where they travel throughout the day, how many there are, etc. On a related note, were any turkeys captured under the permit you had that just expired the end of April. We would appreciate any information you can provide. Deena Fruchtman 612-840-6600 6405 Interlachen Blvd. Sent from my iPhone 25 On May 4, 2016, at 7:18 AM, Timothy Hunter <THunter@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: The wild turkey removal program from the MN‐DNR is a relatively new development and I was not aware it’s existence until earlier this year. When we talked last fall I was not aware of any process in place through the MN‐DNR similar to their deer management program allowing cities to remove turkeys. In January I reached out to the MN‐DNR and was informed of the process they have available for municipalities to manage wild turkey populations, similar to the process for deer management. That is the process I am currently following for your situation. The USDA has the staff with the knowledge and expertise in both turkey behavior and removal methods. I rely on them to advise regarding the efficacy of removal efforts. When I spoke with them yesterday I asked them to fit this request into their schedule as a priority, understanding that they have many municipalities they deal with. Once they are able to survey the area, make some estimate on the location and numbers of turkeys they will make a recommendation regarding removal. If they feel they can effectively remove the turkeys, we will move forward. If they believe they cannot effectively remove turkeys at this time, I will get their recommendations. Wildlife behavior follows general patterns and in the spring the pattern for turkey populations is to disperse. This makes capture and removal much more difficult, but also greatly reduces their impact on properties. That is where the recommendations of the USDA come in. With their expertise coupled with their observations on the ground in your area, we will be able to make a much more educated and effective decision. Concurrent with the USDA conducting their survey work, I am in the process of talking with the MN‐DNR for permits in case the USDA feels they can effectively remove turkeys. Working both sides of the process will expedite the end results. I would be happy to visit you at your home to take a look to see what other measures can be taken to reduce attractants and minimize property damage. There are a number of property management practices that may help reduce the impact of a variety nuisance wildlife species. <image001.gif> Timothy Hunter, Animal Control Officer 952-826-0494 | Fax 952-826-1607 THunter@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Police Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. From: Deena Allen [mailto:deena.allen@ymail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:15 PM To: Timothy Hunter Cc: ncjohnson88@comcast.net; James Hovland; Heather Branigin Subject: Re: Wild Turkey Problem Dear Tim, I find your response somewhat disheartening- if not disingenuous. It appears you responded to another resident by obtaining a wild turkey removal permit and arranging USDA contact. As you know, I spoke with you at length last fall - probably more than once- telling you that we had 17 wild turkeys traveling in a group CONSTANTLY many times a day around our properties on Interlachen and Schaefer Rd wreaking havoc on our properties and disturbing the peace - literally - of the neighborhood. 26 You provided no indication to me that you could do anything to help. In fact, you indicated the opposite. If you had responded appropriately at that time (obtaining a wild turkey permit and contracting with the USDA) and had the 17 turkeys captured and removed at that time, we likely would not be in this continuing situation. So now......., you say it might not be the best time since the turkeys disperse in the spring while mating or giving birth!!! I will send you a bill for the water removal when the turkeys knock my downspouts off (which they do constantly) and water enters my basement and for installing new gardens that they have destroyed. I am afraid to leave my house for vacation due to the potential damage these wild animals can create. Other neighbors have additional property claims as you know. This is not a joke, and is potentially much more serious than domestic animal issues. If the DNR reinstated wild turkeys into MN like I have been told, then it seems they share some responsibility for the extraction of these animals. However, it is the city of Edina that must act in an expedient manner now to reinstate the peace and safety of our neighborhood. An unsuccessful resolution of this problem is not acceptable. Sincerely, Deena Fruchtman 6405 Interlachen Blvd. Edina 55436 Sent from my iPhone On May 3, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Timothy Hunter <THunter@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Ms. Allen and Ms. Johnson, I just spoke with USDA and they will be in contact with you at their earliest opportunity. This is a busy time of year for them, so I do not expect them to have time yet this week, but hopefully next week they will be in touch with you. They will likely make contact with you by phone first followed up by a visit to the area. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions or concerns. <image001.gif> Timothy Hunter, Animal Control Officer 952-826-0494 | Fax 952-826-1607 THunter@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Police Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. From: Timothy Hunter Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 7:16 AM To: 'Deena Allen'; James Hovland; Heather Branigin; 'ncjohnson88@comcast.net' Subject: RE: Wild Turkey Problem Ms. Allen and Ms. Johnson, 27 Thank you for your respective emails on this issue. Wild turkeys have been in Edina and surrounding cities for years and occasionally surface in certain areas, like Parkwood Knolls, creating a nuisance. As turkeys are ground feeders and typically eat bugs, worms, grubs and other insects, they scratch through leave litter, mulch and loose soil looking for food. Certainly seed scattered from bird feeders is also an attractant for turkeys and many other forms of wildlife, like mice, voles, squirrels, chipmunks, hawks, owls, fox, coyote, etc. I would like to correct some of the information you note below. The turkey removal permit the City of Edina currently has was obtained on behalf a homeowner on Lanham Lane and the contract for that removal was made between the homeowner and the USDA‐APHIS‐WS. To my knowledge that removal was suspended due to the time of year. While turkeys group up in flocks during the winter months, they disperse in spring and that makes capture and disposal difficult and time consuming and, hence, more expensive. That said, I will contact USDA and discuss your situation on Schaefer Road and see what they advise. Typically they survey an area to determine the feasibility of removal efforts before committing. If they agree it will be effective to attempt removals in your area, I can proceed with either repurposing the Lanham Lane permits or applying for new permits for your area. If USDA advises against removal now and deferring it to later this year when it will be more effective, I can apply for permits for your area later this year when the turkeys are expected to start grouping up again. In the meantime, minimizing attractants, such as bird feeders, is advisable. Unfortunately, there is not much that can be done to remove scratching areas such as mulched landscaping, open gardens or the like. Motion‐activated sprinklers may help and certainly chasing the turkeys or spraying them with garden hoses can also help, depending on your comfort level. I will let you know what I hear back from the USDA. I expect one to two weeks for USDA to be able to take a look and let me know what their recommendations are, but I will ask them to do what they can to get to this as soon as they can. Please let me know what other questions you might have. <image001.gif> Timothy Hunter, Animal Control Officer 952-826-0494 | Fax 952-826-1607 THunter@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Police Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. From: Deena Allen [mailto:deena.allen@ymail.com] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:32 AM To: James Hovland; Heather Branigin Cc: Timothy Hunter Subject: Fw: Wild Turkey Problem Dear Mr. Hovland, 28 I contacted your office yesterday regarding the significant wild turkey problem in the Parkwood Knolls area of Edina. Your assistant, Heather, said it would be helpful for me to contact you via email to express my concerns. The note below that I sent to Tim Hunter, the Edina Animal Control Officer, describes the situation I called you about today. I am hopeful that the actions put in place by Officer Hunter will resolve the wild turkey problem. If you have questions about the nature or scope of this problem, do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Deena Allen Fruchtman 6405 Interlachen Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 1-612-840-6600 deena.allen@ymail.com ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Deena Allen <deena.allen@ymail.com> To: "thunter@edinamn.gov" <thunter@edinamn.gov> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:06 AM Subject: Wild Turkey Problem Hello Tim, I am sending this email in response to a phone call I received this evening from Josh, the Edina Community Service Officer. He told me that you were out of the office until Tuesday due to a family emergency. I left a call for you today and I think yesterday regarding the continuing wild turkey issue in the Parkwood Knolls area. Josh told me that the city realizes that the wild turkey population has continued to increase and the city has implemented a control/elimination program. Today, I also talked with the DNR Wildlife Manager for our area, Cynthia Osmundson, who told me that Edina does have a Wild Turkey permit approved and in place. She noted that you were listed as the contact person on the permit application. She said the permit was approved on March 22, 2016 and expires on April 30, 2016. She said there would not be an issue with extension of the permit to allow continued focus on reducing and eliminating the wild turkey population in Edina. Cynthia also informed me that other municipalities, including the city of Minneapolis, have similar wild turkey disposition programs in place. Cynthia informed me that Edina has a contract with the USDA Wildlife Services for capture and disposition of the wild turkeys.I understand that the turkeys are captured, killed, processed, and given to local food shelters. This sounds like a good plan. Can you tell me how many turkeys have been captured in Edina under this current permit and from what areas of the city? If the contractor has not focused on the Parkwood Knolls area, can you please establish this area as a priority? The wild turkey population continues to be a major problem in our area with more and more homeowners disturbed by the destructive activities of the 29 turkeys. As you know, these turkeys are huge, run in groups, and create major issues including: Obstructing traffic frequently, Creating traffic problems when vehicles stop to look at them, Scaring children, Obstructing the entry to homes including ramps for disabled, Destroying flower beds, Creating a noise disturbance, Eliminating the ability of homeowners to provide feeders for small wild birds since feeding attacks the turkeys, Knocking gutter downspouts and extensions off allowing rain to enter homes, Spreading dirt and mulch over entire window ledges of lower level and walkout level windows, and Leaving droppings on lawns, patios, walks, and driveways. Your timely attention to implementing the turkey removal process in the Parkwood Knolls area would be appreciated. A timeline with process steps would be helpful to me and to other homeowners. Thank you for your attention to this problem. Please contact me at 612-840- 6600 if you have questions. Kind regards, Deena Allen Fruchtman 6405 Interlachen Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 1-612-840-6600 deena.allen@ymail.com 30 Heather Branigin From:Sarah Lawler <Sarah.Lawler@hennepin.us> Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 3:02 PM To:Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; 'James Hovland' Subject:RE: Scott Neal/Jim Hovland/David Hough - Breakfast Meeting Good afternoon Scott and Jim, David is going to be out of the office on Thursday, September 1 and I’m wondering if the two of you would be available for your breakfast meeting on Thursday, August 25 or Thursday, September 8 if I were to reschedule? Please let me know what you think and I will update the invite. Thank you! Sarah Lawler Administrative Assistant Hennepin County Administration 612‐348‐4447 ‐‐‐‐‐Original Appointment‐‐‐‐‐ From: Sarah Lawler On Behalf Of David Hough Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 4:37 PM To: David Hough; 'Scott H. Neal'; James Hovland; 'James Hovland' Subject: Scott Neal/Jim Hovland/David Hough ‐ Breakfast Meeting When: Thursday, September 01, 2016 7:00 AM‐8:30 AM (UTC‐06:00) Central Time (US & Canada). Where: Edina Grill Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 31 Heather Branigin From:Steven Lerch <steven.lerch@teamaol.com> Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 2:59 PM To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1 @gmail.com Subject:West Woodland Rd - Sidewalk Dear City Council, It has come to my attention that my correspondence and phone conversations in regards to sidewalks should have been directed to the city council and not the city planners. I have had a few conversations showing my support for the much needed sidewalks on West Woodland Rd and was told that plans were in place to make it happen. Seeing the newsletter and talking to workers on our street, I learned that a couple voices of neighbors against the sidewalk has caused the council to put our street "on hold". I reviewed your meetings on line. Good for neighbors on Tower as sidewalks should be throughout our neighborhood, but I am not understanding why one of the key streets with student pedestrian and bike traffic will not be getting a sidewalk. Further I was confused by the comment in the meeting where "pedestrians will be encouraged to walk on streets with sidewalks". That is not how the city planned traffic to date. As you know, the main crosswalk from Southview going east pushes the students down our road. In fact, the crosswalk was built to accommodate the missing sidewalk. The stats brought to the council back this up as well, but I often work from home and watch the students walk down the street while busy parents are driving their kids to and from school. Kids walking with their friends are often playing and pushing and not paying attention to cars. Trust me, it is a crowded situation before and after school. The opportunity is in front of us to make our street safe and connect to the crosswalk that the city built years ago with the plans to put sidewalks in. Unless I missed it, during the meetings there was no reason to not put a sidewalk on West Woodland Rd. Can you please share why this decision was made? One of the correspondence I had with the city had to do with process and poor communication regarding this project. The letters to us spoke of the assessment for the road and sewer for each homeowner. Many of my neighbors thought the sidewalks would be an additional cost to us because the communication did not explain that this is paid for out of a separate budget. Also, it was never explained how the street would be adjusted to accommodate a sidewalk, nor how many pedestrians a day use the street, ect.. Only through a call to the city was this explained to me. Instead we were asked to do a survey without the needed and easy to provide information. Hindsight illustrates I should have not taken the word from the city that a sidewalk was being planned and put more of a priority of attending your meeting. Work travel got in the way, but I was also misled from my past conversations and thought it was in the works. Lesson learned on my part. The good news: Now that the facts have been uncovered, my neighbors have come together and signed a petition that shows that almost 90% is in favor of a sidewalk. It is not too late and the cost to not do it may be too high. Let's make our street safe. Unless the city removes the aforementioned crosswalk, kids will now be sent down an even narrower street. If Edina wants to be a city that encourages safe biking and walking, the council should use the facts (and not the opinions of two homeowners) and get this sidewalk done. The street and our yards are ripped up - no time like the present to get this done. Thanks for considering this needed measure. I would be happy to chat with you over the phone or in person. 32 Steve Lerch 4605 Woodland Rd W Cell: 612-670-6821 33 Heather Branigin From:Sundheim, Kellie <KSundheim@lmc.org> Sent:Monday, May 09, 2016 1:32 PM To:Mayor's Association Subject:[mayorassoc] Reminder - Apply to serve on the LMC Board - Applications due May 27th Applications to serve on the LMC Board due by Friday, May 27th Apply now to serve on the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) Board of Directors and help to lead an organization that represents cities across the state. Serving on the LMC Board of Directors is both an honor and responsibility. One of the League’s strengths has always been its broad and diverse membership. Its ability to serve members’ needs and exhibit leadership by anticipating and proactively addressing city challenges, hinges on having a Board of Directors that is representative, responsible, strategic, and visionary. If you are interested in serving on the LMC Board, please review the Board’s Governance Handbook before submitting an application to ensure you are aware of the roles and responsibilities: The League of Minnesota Cities Governance Handbook was developed by the Board in order to guide the manner in which Board business is conducted and to outline the values and expectations that drive Board service. Board meetings are typically held during the day on the third Thursday of the month. In addition, this year’s board planning retreat is scheduled for September 14-16 in Red Wing. The League reimburses all direct expenses of Board members. Mileage is reimbursed at the current approved rate. A Nominating Committee appointed by the League President will interview candidates Tuesday, June 14th at the LMC Annual Conference in St. Paul. The nominated candidates will be presented to members at the annual business meeting on Thursday, June 16th. The committee considers the following factors when selecting nominees: Geographic representation City population Gender City position (appointed vs. elected) League experience and involvement League members will elect a president, a first vice president, a second vice president, and six directors. If a current Board member is elected to an officer position, there would be one additional opening for a director position. How to apply An application packet is available by contacting Kellie Sundheim, LMC, at (651) 281-1214, (800) 925-1122 or ksundheim@lmc.org. Deadline to submit an application is Friday, May 27th. --- You are currently subscribed to mayorassoc as: ksundheim@lmc.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-274178-113945.a37d2fc7077b5f0d0eb082e7168654c0@listserv.lmc.org --- You are currently subscribed to mayorassoc as: jhovland@edinamn.gov To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-274438-134747.d6efcee84896c0ee8a72ea285a68e539@listserv.lmc.org 34 Heather Branigin From:Christopher Sagsveen <Christopher.Sagsveen@hennepin.us> Sent:Friday, May 06, 2016 2:15 PM To:James Hovland Cc:Allyson Lueneburg; Janis Callison Subject:City of Edina questions Good afternoon Mayor, My name is Chris Sagsveen, and I’m responsible for the operations and maintenance of the county’s highway system. Commissioner Callison emailed me yesterday afternoon, with questions based on a conversation she recently had with you. The purpose of this email is to provide my comments/suggestions in red to each of the topics you raised: 1. Do we have any plans to do pavement work on France Ave. between about 51st and 56th? The road is quite bumpy and may need to be resurfaced. We agree that roadwork is necessary. To address the need, this section of roadway is currently scheduled to be resurfaced in 2017. We will be coordinating with affected stakeholders this year, to ensure there isn’t utility work, striping changes and/or other scheduling conflicts that will impact our ability to resurface the road next year. 2. Would we (Hennepin County) permit the City to re‐orient the lights on the decorative installations that are on France, to be pointed up more than their current configuration? Unfortunately, we cannot re‐ orientate the lights as the modifications would be conflicting with the traffic signals. Staff from our Traffic Operations Division recently met with Chad Milner of your office regarding this request. 3. Would we consider a partnership with Edina to improve the vegetation in the median on York in front of the library? Would Hennepin County do the planting if Edina assumed maintenance responsibilities. We would be happy to sit down with you to discuss a potential partnership project. I would involve staff not only from Transportation, but Environment and Energy as well in this discussion. Staff from the City of Edina are welcome to contact me about establishing a meeting. Thank you, Chris Chris A. Sagsveen, P.E. Department Director Transportation Department (Roads and Bridges) ‐ Operations Hennepin County Public Works |1600 Prairie Drive | Medina, MN 55340 Office: 612‐596‐0330 | Cell: 763‐438‐0882 Chris.Sagsveen@hennepin.us Visit www.hennepin.us Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. 35 Heather Branigin From:The Sandersons <sandersons4600@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 06, 2016 10:21 AM To:James Hovland Subject:Sidewalk on Woodland Road W Dear James, Thank you for your service as the mayor of Edina. I am writing to advocate for a sidewalk on Woodland Road West and asking for your support. My family lives on the corner of Woodland Road West and St. John's Ave. Because of the following reasons, I believe it makes sense to install the sidewalk this spring/summer while the street is being reconstructed. 1. There are 40 children living on our street and we do not have bus service to Concord or Southview and consequently, all of our children walk to and from school. 2. Many children from other streets also use Woodland to get to and from school. Being on the corner, I know that many children from the east end of Tower also use Woodland and cut over to their street on St. Johns Ave. Also, many children from across Wooddale and down Fairfax use Woodland to get to Concord and Southview. 3. The intersection of Concord Ave and Woodland Road West is busy and sidewalks would make that a safer situation for pedestrians. 4. There are minimal physical obstructions to the sidewalk on the south side of Woodland Road W and construction cost is the least amount when compared to the quotes for Tower and 56th street. 5. Our family assumed that Woodland was getting a sidewalk based on the letter we received in Decemeber and so we didn't actively engage in the discussion until recently when we were informed that plans had changed. I would really appreciate your consideration and support in this matter. Sincerely, Kelly Furda 612-306-7770 36 Heather Branigin From:Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 05, 2016 11:44 PM To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1 @gmail.com Cc:Scott H. Neal Subject:Common Sense for Edina - ' the City of Edina's website was attacked and has been taken offline' (see email below) Local Governments: Attractive Targets for Cybercriminals? Cities and counties are attractive targets in part because they’re connected to state systems or other large networks. (TNS) -- Michael Hamilton was the CIO for the city of Seattle when he noticed the city’s security systems had snagged a booby-trapped email. The threat was contained before it became a problem, he said, but the malicious program apparently targeted power marketers, the utility employees who negotiate with wholesalers for electricity. Power marketers tend to keep their dealings fairly close to the chest, Hamilton said, so how did one of them end up in the sights of cybercriminals? Hackers in China, he said, breached Google in 2009. Google creates some of its own electricity and has its own power marketers — power marketers, Hamilton said, who have connections with people at much larger utility companies. Small governments and local agencies generate troves of sensitive information in the course of doing business. But what may be more worrisome is that many towns and agencies are also connected to state networks or infrastructure systems — and local governments’ resources to protect their networks and stored data can vary widely. ATTRACTIVE TARGETS “That’s local government getting in the sights of a nation-state for the purpose of, likely, disruption,” he said.Hamilton, who worked for Seattle from 2006 to 2013 and is now the CEO at the cybersecurity consulting firm Critical Informatics Inc., said the errant message Seattle flagged was likely part of an effort to wrangle a much larger prize, probably something under the umbrella of a larger utility, such as a power grid. Word of a major credit card data breach always sucks the air out of the room for IT types, he said, but oftentimes most victims are going to get their money back, along with free identity theft protection and credit monitoring afterward, and banks catch a lot of the attempted fraud. 37 “I get another letter from a credit card company — or my toilet won’t flush for three days,” Hamilton said. “The lowest-hanging fruit is local government.” It’s hard to say how plugged in and networked public systems, such as sewage or traffic lights, really are. If they are somehow networked, it was likely done in a duct-tape-and-baling-wire fashion, Hamilton said, and those kind of networks aren’t hard to find for someone who knows what they’re doing. In March, the Justice Department filed charges against seven Iranian hackers, including one who allegedly accessed the control software for a 102-by-22-foot dam in a New York suburb. The feds say the man who hacked into the dam systems could access information about water depth or temperature, but the actual equipment to operate the small dam’s gates had never been connected. Plenty of breaches aren’t as brazen or spooky. In late February, someone broke into and defaced the website for East County Fire & Rescue. A firefighter logged in at the station and found that searches for the site were being redirected toward pornography, according to a police report. The fire district shut down the site and called the sheriff’s office. The case was suspended with no known suspects or leads. The fire district is connected to county systems that have their own protections. Its website was built separately, and mainly to share information with residents, interim chief Al Gillespie said. “It was more of a pain in the neck than a real problem for our organization,” he said. “It’s not something we used to have to worry about, but it certainly is the way of the world now,” he said. NETWORKING RISKS Local governments are attractive targets, said Sam Kim, Clark County’s chief information officer, in part because they’re connected to state systems or other large networks. “That could be a huge vulnerability. That’s why I say, regardless of how big or small you are, you need to be vigilant,” he said. The State Auditor’s Office has been ramping up its efforts in examining information security practices in the past few years. The office tested five state agencies and said in findings shared in 2014 that officials found hundreds of security flaws. 38 “It was a very specific, focused audit, where we looked at what state agencies were doing in terms of old equipment, and their procedures and policies,” said Aaron Munn, the chief information security officer for the state auditor. Moving on from state agencies, Munn said, the office has recently started working with more local governments about cybersecurity, and a few audits were ongoing. The auditor’s office released its report on the city of Mill Creek in Snohomish County, the first city to volunteer for a specific security audit. CONSTANT ATTACKS Kim said it’s hard to say how many attacks the county fields, because there are so many avenues that hackers try. “We’re constantly under attack, constantly being probed,” he said. He couldn’t say where all the attacks were coming from, either, but plenty didn’t originate from the United States. Munn said attempts to crack a network can range from phishing emails to high-tech, nation- backed break-ins. “It’s difficult to answer that question, but every organization is susceptible,” Munn said. Public agencies often lack money or resources for security, he said, and many governments looked toward their IT departments as a place to cut back during the recession. Early last year, the Municipal Research and Services Center, a nonprofit organization that provides research and data for local governments in Washington, surveyed and interviewed officials from states, cities and counties about information security. (Hamilton’s consulting company, then called M.K. Hamilton & Associates, did the study.) About 80 percent of survey respondents worked for communities of fewer than 25,000 people, and 60 percent served fewer than 10,000. Many of those organizations said they had zero staff members working in IT, and more than half said they outsourced that work. Perhaps commensurate with the size of their organizations, a majority of respondents reported they had minimal or zero funding. “There’s a workforce issue, as to training,” Munn said. “These are complex issues we’re dealing with that require maintenance, but there’s also availability challenges.” One of the biggest problems facing the public sector is the lack of security professionals, Hamilton said. “Cities, counties, public utilities cannot afford these people,” he said. 39 EXPERTS IN DEMAND Demand in general for cybersecurity experts is high, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The number of people employed as information security analysts, the bureau’s title for IT professionals who specialize in cybersecurity, is expected to climb 18 percent by 2024, much faster than the average for other occupations. The median pay for cybercrime experts in the public sector was about $74,000 per year in 2014, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and it was $89,000 across all industries. In a 2015 report, the National Association of State Chief Information Officers surveyed IT chiefs from 48 states, and about 92 percent of respondents said pay prevented them from attracting and keeping talent, and that was for state governments. Voters should talk to their local agencies or governments if they’re concerned about their town’s information infrastructure, Kim said, but one of the best things a person can do to bolster security at the government level is to watch out for their own: Use good password practices, keep browsers and operating systems updated and use two-factor authentication systems where possible. “Just like everybody else, the No. 1 vulnerability is not our systems, it’s people,” Kim said. “It’s the inside job, and it could be no malevolence involved.” Most people who sit down at computers connected in a roundabout way to some sensitive data somewhere are just trying to do their jobs — and they aren’t hired to stave off computer criminals. They make mistakes: Kim said one test IT programs will do is leave nice USB thumb drives lying in the parking lot to see who takes the bait and plugs in a strange drive into a secure network. “Let’s face it, cybersecurity, information security is not on the foremost of anybody’s mind,” Kim said. “They want to complete their task.” A large piece of dealing with that is a matter of training to meet new threats, he said, and that ought to be for everyone in an organization. Getting buy-in from agency executives and elected officials can be another hurdle, he said. “When do burglar alarms get installed? After the break-in.” LITTLE OFFICIAL CONCERN Public information technology workers told the Municipal Research and Services Center that they generally agreed agency heads and elected officials need additional education to understand the extent of the problems. 40 Respondents said 75 percent of government executives had little or no interest in addressing information security risks. On a scale of 1 to 5, 75 percent of respondents gave government executives scores less than 3 for their awareness of information security threats. “In the focus groups, it was widely acknowledged that the level of threat is increasing, especially to smaller organizations without the means to defend themselves,” the center said. One advantage that governments and public agencies do have, Kim said, is they can work together. You probably won’t see Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman working together on security, he said, since they have trade secrets to protect and an interest in looking like a more secure bet to customers. Public agencies, on the other hand, all face the same problems, work in the same space and can share resources and expertise. They don’t have competition, he said. Kim said he’s working on a plan to centralize information security and network services for public agencies with the county. The idea is that the county’s towns and agencies could all share the same standards and systems for storing their data and operating their networks, all operating using the county’s architecture. The county’s always playing interference and patching up weak spots, he said. No system — especially one that needs to be open and usable, like a government’s — can be completely secure. Most hackers tend to go for the path of least resistance, so a large part of being secure is making sure you don’t look like an easy target, Kim said. “We just need to not be alarmist, but make sure we’re all vigilant,” he said. “I think government in particular owes the residents of this county to assure them, ‘Hey, we’re doing everything in our power to make sure things are safe and secure.’?” http://www.govtech.com/security/Local-Governments-Attractive-Targets-for- Cybercriminals.html?utm_term=Local%20Governments%3A%20Attractive%20Targets%20f or%20Cybercriminals&utm_campaign=Collaborators%20in%20Chief%20Share%20Successe s%20at%20NASCIO%2C%20Ransomware%20Attack%20on%20Utility%20Provider%20Hig hlights%20Organizational%20Vulnerabilities&utm_content=email&utm_source=Act- On+Software&utm_medium=email 41 ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: City of Edina <mail@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 4:13 PM Subject: Access To Edina City Council Agenda And Video Stream View this email in your browser Access to Edina City Council Agenda Good afternoon, Earlier this afternoon, the City of Edina's website was attacked and has been taken offline while the website developer resolves the issue. To view the May 3 City Council meeting agenda, visit http://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaPublic/MeetingView.aspx?MeetingID=71. To watch a live-stream of the City Council meeting beginning at 7 p.m., visit https://edina.granicus.com/ViewPublisher.php?view_id=7. The link will appear after the meeting begins. Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your pOutlook prevented automatic download of this picture from thFacebook Facebook Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Twitter Twitter Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your pOutlook prevented automatic download of this picture from thInstagram Instagram Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.YouTube YouTube Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your pOutlook prevented automatic download of this picture from thEmail Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 42 Email Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your pOutlook prevented automatic download of this picture from thWebsite Website Copyright © 2016 City of Edina, All rights reserved. You're receiving this email because you live in the City of Edina or have opted in to receive information from the City of Edina. Our mailing address is: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Add us to your address book unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences David Frenkel Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 43 Heather Branigin From:Joel Stegner <joel.r.stegner@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 05, 2016 3:42 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Re: Article on Pentagon Park redevelopment in Minn Post The entire Council. If they haven't seen it, I think they would be interested. Thanks, Joel Joel Stegner 6312 Barrie Road 1C Edina, MN 55435 952-843-3440 On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Edina Mail <mail@edinamn.gov> wrote: Dear Joel, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. This is a general email address for the city. Can you tell me to whom you would like me to forward this message to? Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389 lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joel Stegner [mailto:joel.r.stegner@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 1:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Article on Pentagon Park redevelopment in Minn Post 44 https://www.minnpost.com/stroll/2016/05/once-iconic-office-park-edina-offers-close- look-how-aesthetic-styles-change?utm_source=MinnPost+e- mail+newsletters&utm_campaign=6950e915c2- 5_5_2016_Daily_Newsletter5_5_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_3631302e9c- 6950e915c2-124093273 Provides a good outside perspective on the project. Joel Stegner 6312 Barrie Road 1C Edina, MN 55435 952-843-3440 45 Heather Branigin From:Johnson, Bruce <bruce.johnson@WillisTowersWatson.com> Sent:Thursday, May 05, 2016 9:28 AM To:Edina Mail Cc:Mohamed Mohamed Subject:Golf Terrace B Roadway Construction - Request for Consideration Council Members, My wife Barb and I have lived for 29 years at 4601 West 56th Street, which is in the middle of the ongoing Golf Terrace B project. We attended all of the informational meetings leading up to the project and I attended and spoke at the Council meeting where the project was discussed and was opened up for public comments. We understand and appreciate the need for this work and look forward to its completion. We commend Mohamed Mohamed for his work as the on‐site representative for this project – I am sure he is getting plenty of calls and “suggestions” on how to improve the work on the project. Communication and coordination are key on projects like this and more is always better from my perspective in order to help reduce the uncertainty and questions that would typically arise during a project like this. I have two (2) points I ask for your consideration on, one tied to the ongoing project and the other to the assessment process: 1) During the informational sessions Living Streets and sidewalks topics were lightly addressed and the only sidewalk identified was the one on Concord Avenue north of South View Middle School. During the council meeting the topic of sidewalks came up when conversation shifted to safety, Living Streets and the possibility of connecting Concord Avenue to France Avenue in the future with a sidewalk system. (For the record my opinion was we don’t need the sidewalk on our street as during the course of raising our family we were able to live or conduct a lot of activities such as being able to bike, walk, rollerblade, skateboard etc. safely. We were “living in the streets” with no issues. – Sorry for the editorial.) Discussion during the council meeting led to making a decision to investigate whether a sidewalk would be best installed on Woodland, Tower or 56th. Although there were some surveys conducted it appears to me that the council somewhat arbitrarily determined the side walk should go on West 56th Street and it was going on the south side of the street. Residents on our street were only given the chance to vote on whether or not there should be parking on both sides of the street which would determine if the street was 24’ or 27’ in width. Now Tower residents have petitioned and were granted the right to add a sidewalk. Do we really need sidewalks on both streets when the council thought one would be sufficient since there is already one on 58th Street?? If it is still the decision to have sidewalks on both Tower and 56th I ask that you consider the following: Due to the scale and size of the houses and lots on this 2 block stretch of 56th street between Wooddale and Concord Avenue’s I am asking you to consider using a 4’ wide sidewalk similar to what was used on Arden Avenue between 50th Street and Arden Park. The 5’ side sidewalk makes sense in a lot of applications but, for this short stretch of street I believe the 4’ would handle the foot traffic, fit more in scale with this segment of the neighborhood and reduce the chances that any of our trees would be affected or have to be removed. 2) The question was raised during the council meeting as to why the assessment for projects like this are done by neighborhood. The response was that the city/council had looked into this before and felt that it would not be fair to assess in another manner because some neighborhoods would then be paying more than their fair share (not exact words but along that line of reasoning). I would argue to the contrary in that this method of assessment is not fair and from my perspective in fact punitive in nature because of the very fact that residents have no say in (and often no 46 knowledge as to the possibility) when their neighborhood will be updated. I understand it is based on age of infrastructure and other considerations that City Staff reviews in the determination process. The council makes decisions all the time in regards to infrastructure be it schools, public buildings, parks, etc. and those costs are shared equally amongst the residents and businesses of Edina. I am comfortable (no exactly happy) with the level of my assessment but, what about the cost to future neighborhoods/residents? This issue was highlighted by a conversation with a plumbing contractor we had in to determine whether or not we need to replace our sewer line. He mentioned that he was being assessed $53,000 in his community for a new water line. I would hope we would not get to that cost point in Edina but, with the costs of construction going up there are no guarantees on future projects and costs and at that level would be punitive (from my perspective) to many residents. Please consider: There has got be a formula that the City Staff can determine that would take into account the past assessments that have been paid but, spread the future costs amongst all residents and businesses in a more equitable manner so that we are not punitive towards residents in the future that will cause them to have to move or leave a house / business that they have occupied and contributed to the costs/expenses of the city of Edina over many years. I would be happy to sit on a task force to investigate this possible alternative, even though I can’t guarantee I have the experience or intellectual prowess to determine what that formula may be. I appreciate the time, effort and thought that all of you put forth in your roles representing and making decisions for the City of Edina and its residents. Bruce Johnson 4601 West 56th Street P: 952/926-5052 C: 612/803-4452 W: 763/302-7180 ______________________________________________________________________ For information pertaining to Willis' email confidentiality and monitoring policy, usage restrictions, or for specific company registration and regulatory status information, please visit http://www.willis.com/email_trailer.aspx We are now able to offer our clients an encrypted email capability for secure communication purposes. If you wish to take advantage of this service or learn more about it, please let me know or contact your Client Advocate for full details. ~W67897 ______________________________________________________________________ 47 Heather Branigin From:Deena Allen <deena.allen@ymail.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 04, 2016 4:43 PM To:Timothy Hunter Cc:Nancy Johnson; Heather Branigin; James Hovland Subject:Re: Wild Turkey Problem Tim, Thanks for this information and follow up. Deena Fruchtman 6405 Interlachen Blvd 612-840-6600 Sent from my iPhone On May 4, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Timothy Hunter <THunter@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: USDA is the organization with the expertise in wildlife removal and they may simply survey the area, but I know from experience they also like to speak with people impacted by the wildlife issues. That is the best way they can determine the extent of the issues and determine the feasibility of removal. If they determine they can effectively remove the nuisance wildlife they will need access to the properties to see how removal can be done and to get permission forms completed by the property owners that will enable to conduct removal activities. Those are the primary reasons the USDA may be in contact with you. <image001.gif> Timothy Hunter, Animal Control Officer 952-826-0494 | Fax 952-826-1607 THunter@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Police Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. From: Deena Allen [mailto:deena.allen@ymail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 4:17 PM To: Timothy Hunter Cc: Nancy Johnson Subject: Re: Wild Turkey Problem Dear Tim, Why does the usda need to contact us? Deena Allen Sent from my iPhone On May 3, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Timothy Hunter <THunter@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: 48 Ms. Allen and Ms. Johnson, I just spoke with USDA and they will be in contact with you at their earliest opportunity. This is a busy time of year for them, so I do not expect them to have time yet this week, but hopefully next week they will be in touch with you. They will likely make contact with you by phone first followed up by a visit to the area. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions or concerns. <image001.gif> Timothy Hunter, Animal Control Officer 952-826-0494 | Fax 952-826-1607 THunter@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Police Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. From: Timothy Hunter Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 7:16 AM To: 'Deena Allen'; James Hovland; Heather Branigin; 'ncjohnson88@comcast.net' Subject: RE: Wild Turkey Problem Ms. Allen and Ms. Johnson, Thank you for your respective emails on this issue. Wild turkeys have been in Edina and surrounding cities for years and occasionally surface in certain areas, like Parkwood Knolls, creating a nuisance. As turkeys are ground feeders and typically eat bugs, worms, grubs and other insects, they scratch through leave litter, mulch and loose soil looking for food. Certainly seed scattered from bird feeders is also an attractant for turkeys and many other forms of wildlife, like mice, voles, squirrels, chipmunks, hawks, owls, fox, coyote, etc. I would like to correct some of the information you note below. The turkey removal permit the City of Edina currently has was obtained on behalf a homeowner on Lanham Lane and the contract for that removal was made between the homeowner and the USDA‐APHIS‐WS. To my knowledge that removal was suspended due to the time of year. While turkeys group up in flocks during the winter months, they disperse in spring and that makes capture and disposal difficult and time consuming and, hence, more expensive. That said, I will contact USDA and discuss your situation on Schaefer Road and see what they advise. Typically they survey an area to determine the feasibility of removal efforts before committing. If they agree it will be effective to attempt removals in your area, I can proceed with either repurposing the Lanham Lane permits or applying for new permits for your area. If USDA advises against removal now and deferring it to later this year when it will be more effective, I can apply for permits for your area later this year when the turkeys are expected to start grouping up again. In the meantime, minimizing attractants, such as bird feeders, is advisable. Unfortunately, there is not much that can be done to remove scratching areas such as mulched landscaping, open gardens or the like. Motion‐activated sprinklers may help and certainly chasing the turkeys or spraying them with garden hoses can also help, depending on your comfort level. 49 I will let you know what I hear back from the USDA. I expect one to two weeks for USDA to be able to take a look and let me know what their recommendations are, but I will ask them to do what they can to get to this as soon as they can. Please let me know what other questions you might have. <image001.gif> Timothy Hunter, Animal Control Officer 952-826-0494 | Fax 952-826-1607 THunter@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Police Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. From: Deena Allen [mailto:deena.allen@ymail.com] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:32 AM To: James Hovland; Heather Branigin Cc: Timothy Hunter Subject: Fw: Wild Turkey Problem Dear Mr. Hovland, I contacted your office yesterday regarding the significant wild turkey problem in the Parkwood Knolls area of Edina. Your assistant, Heather, said it would be helpful for me to contact you via email to express my concerns. The note below that I sent to Tim Hunter, the Edina Animal Control Officer, describes the situation I called you about today. I am hopeful that the actions put in place by Officer Hunter will resolve the wild turkey problem. If you have questions about the nature or scope of this problem, do not hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Deena Allen Fruchtman 6405 Interlachen Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 1-612-840-6600 deena.allen@ymail.com ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Deena Allen <deena.allen@ymail.com> To: "thunter@edinamn.gov" <thunter@edinamn.gov> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 12:06 AM Subject: Wild Turkey Problem Hello Tim, I am sending this email in response to a phone call I received this evening from Josh, the Edina Community Service Officer. He told me that you were out of the office until Tuesday due to a family emergency. I left a call for you today and I think yesterday regarding the continuing wild turkey issue in the Parkwood Knolls area. Josh told me that the city realizes that the wild turkey population has continued to increase and the city has implemented a control/elimination program. 50 Today, I also talked with the DNR Wildlife Manager for our area, Cynthia Osmundson, who told me that Edina does have a Wild Turkey permit approved and in place. She noted that you were listed as the contact person on the permit application. She said the permit was approved on March 22, 2016 and expires on April 30, 2016. She said there would not be an issue with extension of the permit to allow continued focus on reducing and eliminating the wild turkey population in Edina. Cynthia also informed me that other municipalities, including the city of Minneapolis, have similar wild turkey disposition programs in place. Cynthia informed me that Edina has a contract with the USDA Wildlife Services for capture and disposition of the wild turkeys.I understand that the turkeys are captured, killed, processed, and given to local food shelters. This sounds like a good plan. Can you tell me how many turkeys have been captured in Edina under this current permit and from what areas of the city? If the contractor has not focused on the Parkwood Knolls area, can you please establish this area as a priority? The wild turkey population continues to be a major problem in our area with more and more homeowners disturbed by the destructive activities of the turkeys. As you know, these turkeys are huge, run in groups, and create major issues including: Obstructing traffic frequently, Creating traffic problems when vehicles stop to look at them, Scaring children, Obstructing the entry to homes including ramps for disabled, Destroying flower beds, Creating a noise disturbance, Eliminating the ability of homeowners to provide feeders for small wild birds since feeding attacks the turkeys, Knocking gutter downspouts and extensions off allowing rain to enter homes, Spreading dirt and mulch over entire window ledges of lower level and walkout level windows, and Leaving droppings on lawns, patios, walks, and driveways. Your timely attention to implementing the turkey removal process in the Parkwood Knolls area would be appreciated. A timeline with process steps would be helpful to me and to other homeowners. Thank you for your attention to this problem. Please contact me at 612-840- 6600 if you have questions. Kind regards, Deena Allen Fruchtman 6405 Interlachen Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 51 1-612-840-6600 deena.allen@ymail.com 52 Heather Branigin From:Thommen, Wade G <wadethommen@cbburnet.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 03, 2016 11:21 PM To:James Hovland Subject:Fwd: News Hi Jim, Hope all is well! I appreciate all your work! Below is a message I sent to Jennifer and Scott. It takes a lot for me to express concerns but this pushed my buttons since I sat through at least two long presentations in Rotary about OD and the Rummier foundation. Tonight was bad press for Edina and ironically indirectly Edina Rotary. I don't get it?? Kare 11 made Edina the focus of two victims of OD and lack of preparation Just my thoughts Best Regards, Wade Wade Thommen Coldwell Banker Burnet Begin forwarded message: From: "Thommen, Wade G" <wadethommen@cbburnet.com> Date: May 3, 2016 at 10:46:16 PM CDT To: jbennerotte@edinarotary.org, sneal@EdinaMN.gov Subject: News Hi Jennifer and Scott Hope all is well and also thanks for all your work this year! I am not quick to bring up concerns but watching the news tonight I was a little taken back. I have attended at least two Rotary meetings focused on the Steve Rummier Foundation. Tonight the focus in the news was how Edina among other community 1st responders do not provide an important anti-drug overdose medication?? I don't get it?? Ironically I don't think it was good press! Just some thoughts. Wade Thommen Coldwell Banker Burnet The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's confidential business and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments were free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and/or malicious code when sent. This message and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective and remedial action about viruses and other defects. The sender's company is not liable for any loss or damage arising in any way from this message or its attachments. Nothing in this email shall be deemed to create a binding contract to purchase/sell real estate. The sender of this email does not have the authority to bind a buyer or seller to a contract via written or verbal communications including, but not limited to, email communications. 53 Heather Branigin From:Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 03, 2016 11:03 PM To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle Cc:Scott H. Neal Subject:Common Sense for Edina - Governing magazine : The Perils and Promises of a Popular Yet Controversial Financing Method From the article below: 'Intended to eliminate blight in the poorest neighborhoods, TIF projects are often criticized for funneling money away from core services and to neighborhoods that are neither blighted nor poor.' 'The key is to use them on public goods, rather than on private real estate speculations that ultimately should be left to the market.' http://www.governing.com/columns/urban-notebook/gov-tax-increment-financing.html Tax increment financing (TIF) is one of the most popular financing techniques in a locality’s toolbox. It’s also one of the most unpopular methods among some policy wonks. Intended to eliminate blight in the poorest neighborhoods, TIF projects are often criticized for funneling money away from core services and to neighborhoods that are neither blighted nor poor. But the problem with TIF isn’t the policy itself. When applied properly, TIF can bring the notions of value capture and financial accountability to public works. TIF policies vary by structure. But generally TIF works like this: A municipality approves and floats bonds for a new amenity. Then the municipality draws a boundary around the area, estimating which properties will benefit from the amenity. To pay the debt, the municipality uses the added property or sales tax revenue -- called the “increment” -- that results from within the boundary. TIF is controversial because it’s become a financing source, and in some cases a slush fund, for some municipalities to speculate on private redevelopment projects. In Chicago, up to one-sixth of the budget has been used for TIF projects, including construction of a Marriott and a Whole Foods. Many of urban America’s much-maligned stadiums and convention centers were funded through TIFs. Because TIF began as a blight combatant, it’s also been used for the controversial practice of performing eminent domain for private uses, such as when Detroit demolished a neighborhood for a GM plant. There are several advantages to using TIF, rather than money from the general fund, for these public goods. First, it forces neighborhoods to fund their own amenities. People who benefit from proximity to a project via 54 higher property values, added commerce, or use of that amenity, will actually pay for it. This matters in an age when struggling inner-city neighborhoods and outer suburbs alike resent funding downtown projects that have little to do with them, especially if that means their own services are cut. Second, TIF incentivizes governments to use the land within TIF boundaries for high revenue-generating purposes.But TIF isn’t all bad. A better use for TIF has been for core public works projects, such as libraries, parks, underground infrastructure and street improvements. Mass transit has been a particularly common TIF-funded amenity, which is fitting given that transit is generally built near intensive, revenue-generating uses. Of course, TIF doesn’t guarantee against boondoggles. But a third asset is that TIF, if structured properly, encourages accountability. If officials know that a project must pay for itself through added tax receipts in a specific location, they’ll be more cautious about what and where they build. And because TIF demands a before-and-after look at an area’s revenue levels, it clarifies whether an amenity has worked. TIF is not the only value-capture option. Other options include special assessment districts, land value taxes and developmental impact fees. While varying in substance, all of these value-capture policies are much more pragmatic and targeted than simply funding projects willy-nilly through the general fund. The key is to use them on public goods, rather than on private real estate speculations that ultimately should be left to the market. David Frenkel 55 Heather Branigin From:Lori Grotz <lori@lorigrotz.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:23 PM To:Cary Teague; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc:Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject:RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Hi Cary, I guess a stop work order from Edina staff means nothing to contractors. The workers are still laying block. Lori Grotz From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori@lorigrotz.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 3:59 PM To: 'Cary Teague'; 'David Fisher'; 'James Hovland'; 'Kevin Staunton'; 'Robert Stewart'; 'swensonann1@gmail.com'; 'Mary Brindle'; 'Scott H. Neal' Cc: 'Tom Schmitz'; 'Lisa Schaefer' Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Cary, Thank you for your assistance. It is greatly appreciated. I will watch for your stop work order. Lori Grotz From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 3:46 PM To: 'Lori Grotz'; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Thanks Lori, I will have the building department go back to post a stop work order. Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952-826-0460 | Fax 952-826-0389 | Cell 952-826-0236 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 cteague@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori@lorigrotz.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 2:28 PM To: Cary Teague; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit 56 Cary, Thank you for the response. The workers continue to work in the backyard at 5504 Dever Dr. I have seen 4 workers and can hear the sawing, hammering, and shoveling of rock. The dirt and rock are still in the street. See attached photo. Lori Grotz From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:46 PM To: David Fisher; 'Lori Grotz'; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Members of the building department went out to the site this morning. The homeowner at 5504 Dever plans to build a patio and two foot retaining wall in the back. They are moving over 10 yards of dirt, therefore, a grading permit is required. Staff stopped the work, required the dirt and material to be removed out of the street; and required the builder to submit plans for a grading permit. The grading permit will be processed through the building and engineering department. Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952-826-0460 | Fax 952-826-0389 | Cell 952-826-0236 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 cteague@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: David Fisher Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 8:44 AM To: 'Lori Grotz'; Cary Teague; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Correct. 5504 Dever Dr. David Fisher, Chief Building Official 952-826-0450 | Fax 952-826-0389 DFisher@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori@lorigrotz.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 8:37 AM To: David Fisher; Cary Teague; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Dave, The address needing the permit is 5504 Dever Dr. and not 5509 Dever Dr. as you mistakenly stated in your email. Thank you for your attention. 57 Lori Grotz From: David Fisher [mailto:DFisher@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 8:24 AM To: 'Lori Grotz'; Cary Teague; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Good morning, I will have a building inspector go to the site, inquire about the landscaping project, inform the contractor that a permit is required and take the necessary action to have the contractor obtain a permit. Thank you for the photos. There are no currant permits under construction at 5509 Dever Dr. David Fisher, Chief Building Official 952-826-0450 | Fax 952-826-0389 DFisher@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori@lorigrotz.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:05 AM To: Cary Teague; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Subject: 5504 Dever Drive permit Construction of some type began in the rear yard at 5504 Dever Drive on May 2, 2016. No permits for the work are shown on the Edina website. Section 10‐676 of the Edina Muni Code requires a grading permit if 10 cubic yards of earth is removed/graded with a project. More than 10 cubic yards of earth have been removed with bobcats from the rear yard at 5504 Dever Dr. Crushed rock and at least four pallets of retaining wall blocks were delivered. See attached photos. In the rear yard, the bobcat removed the existing deck and earth. What is being built? Where are the permits? Where will the drainage be directed? We have drainage concerns for our property. Currently, the sump water drains via a pop up drain to 5509 Park Place and not to the street as is depicted in the Edina “Sump pump discharge connections policy”. The SW roof drain is buried and the outlet discharges at the SW property line. This water also drains directly onto Mr. Devan Dubynk’s property. The area is now being torn up. Now is the time to make proper corrections to direct the water to the street. What were the existing contours and what will be the future contours? 58 Please halt the work until the requirements have been submitted and approved. Lori Grotz 5513 Park Place 59 Heather Branigin From:Cary Teague Sent:Tuesday, May 03, 2016 4:16 PM To:'Lori Grotz'; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc:Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject:RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Lori, It should be posted on the front door now. Cary Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952-826-0460 | Fax 952-826-0389 | Cell 952-826-0236 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 cteague@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori@lorigrotz.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 3:59 PM To: Cary Teague; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Cary, Thank you for your assistance. It is greatly appreciated. I will watch for your stop work order. Lori Grotz From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 3:46 PM To: 'Lori Grotz'; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Thanks Lori, I will have the building department go back to post a stop work order. Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952-826-0460 | Fax 952-826-0389 | Cell 952-826-0236 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 cteague@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business 60 From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori@lorigrotz.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 2:28 PM To: Cary Teague; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Cary, Thank you for the response. The workers continue to work in the backyard at 5504 Dever Dr. I have seen 4 workers and can hear the sawing, hammering, and shoveling of rock. The dirt and rock are still in the street. See attached photo. Lori Grotz From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:46 PM To: David Fisher; 'Lori Grotz'; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz; Lisa Schaefer Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Members of the building department went out to the site this morning. The homeowner at 5504 Dever plans to build a patio and two foot retaining wall in the back. They are moving over 10 yards of dirt, therefore, a grading permit is required. Staff stopped the work, required the dirt and material to be removed out of the street; and required the builder to submit plans for a grading permit. The grading permit will be processed through the building and engineering department. Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952-826-0460 | Fax 952-826-0389 | Cell 952-826-0236 4801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424 cteague@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: David Fisher Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 8:44 AM To: 'Lori Grotz'; Cary Teague; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Correct. 5504 Dever Dr. David Fisher, Chief Building Official 952-826-0450 | Fax 952-826-0389 DFisher@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori@lorigrotz.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 8:37 AM To: David Fisher; Cary Teague; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit 61 Dave, The address needing the permit is 5504 Dever Dr. and not 5509 Dever Dr. as you mistakenly stated in your email. Thank you for your attention. Lori Grotz From: David Fisher [mailto:DFisher@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 8:24 AM To: 'Lori Grotz'; Cary Teague; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Cc: Tom Schmitz Subject: RE: 5504 Dever Drive permit Good morning, I will have a building inspector go to the site, inquire about the landscaping project, inform the contractor that a permit is required and take the necessary action to have the contractor obtain a permit. Thank you for the photos. There are no currant permits under construction at 5509 Dever Dr. David Fisher, Chief Building Official 952-826-0450 | Fax 952-826-0389 DFisher@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lori Grotz [mailto:lori@lorigrotz.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:05 AM To: Cary Teague; David Fisher; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com; Mary Brindle; Scott H. Neal Subject: 5504 Dever Drive permit Construction of some type began in the rear yard at 5504 Dever Drive on May 2, 2016. No permits for the work are shown on the Edina website. Section 10‐676 of the Edina Muni Code requires a grading permit if 10 cubic yards of earth is removed/graded with a project. More than 10 cubic yards of earth have been removed with bobcats from the rear yard at 5504 Dever Dr. Crushed rock and at least four pallets of retaining wall blocks were delivered. See attached photos. In the rear yard, the bobcat removed the existing deck and earth. What is being built? Where are the permits? Where will the drainage be directed? We have drainage concerns for our property. Currently, the sump water drains via a pop up drain to 5509 Park Place and not to the street as is depicted in the Edina “Sump pump discharge connections policy”. The SW roof drain is buried and the outlet discharges at the SW property line. This water also drains directly onto 62 Mr. Devan Dubynk’s property. The area is now being torn up. Now is the time to make proper corrections to direct the water to the street. What were the existing contours and what will be the future contours? Please halt the work until the requirements have been submitted and approved. Lori Grotz 5513 Park Place 63 Heather Branigin From:Lynette Biunno Sent:Tuesday, May 03, 2016 3:35 PM To:'Louis M. Mansky' Subject:RE: Revisit of sidewalk addition to Woodland Road West Dear Louis, Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389 lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Louis M. Mansky [mailto:mansky@umn.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 3:33 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Revisit of sidewalk addition to Woodland Road West To: Edina City Council Re: Revisit of sidewalk addition to Woodland Road West Please DO NOT add a sidewalk to Woodland Road West without future analyses of pedestrian needs on existing/new sidewalks in the neighborhood ‐ In January, the Edina City Council voted to create space on the south side of Woodland Road West for a future sidewalk and approved installation of a sidewalk on 56th Street. ‐ Recent resident petitions requested addition of a sidewalk to Tower Street. Council approved a motion to add a sidewalk to Tower St. ‐ Please refrain from revisiting sidewalk installation on Woodland Road West. New sidewalks on the 2 streets to the north (ie, Tower Street, 56th Street) and an existing sidewalk to the south (ie, 58th Street) could obviate the need to ever install a sidewalk on Woodland Road West. 64 ‐ The effects of the new sidewalks on pedestrian traffic patterns needs to be analyzed over many years in order to determine if there is a legitimate need for yet another sidewalk on Woodland Road West. ‐ Please do not reverse your previous decision! Louis Mansky 5701 Fairfax Avenue Email: mansky@umn.edu 65 Heather Branigin From:Solvei Wilmot Sent:Tuesday, May 03, 2016 3:30 PM To:'Kimberly Behm'; Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Subject:RE: Weekly recycling Good Day Ms. Behm: In regard to being able to provide weekly collection, Edina's current contract, which runs through 2019, is for every other week collection. However other citizens have expressed an interest in weekly recycling collection and the Edina City Council has directed staff to seek input from the residents. As a result, Speak up Edina, an Edina website for feedback, ideas and discussion, will ask questions regarding: shifting to weekly recycling collection, collection costs and environment impact. The discussion will open the last week of May and be open all of June. Please log into www.speakupEdina.org to be included in the discussion. I appreciate your interest in recycling and hope you will be able to provide feedback later this month. Sincerely, Solvei Wilmot, RS, Environmental Health Specialist I/Recycling Coordinator 952‐826‐0463 | Fax 952‐826‐0390 swilmot@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Kimberly Behm [mailto:behmera@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:12 PM To: Solvei Wilmot; Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Subject: Weekly recycling Hi all, Wondering if it is possible to change our recycling frequency to every week? We just ordered another bin, but even that won't contain us. We get tagged bc we can't fit everything in. Want to do our part and recycle, but can't keep up at a bi‐ weekly pace. We end up getting tagged or tossing recyclables in the garbage. Thanks for your consideration, Kim Behm Sent from my iPhone 1 Heather Branigin From:Jordan Gilgenbach Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 2:29 PM To:Heather Branigin Subject:FW: Nordic ski trails at Braemar Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator 952‐826‐0396 | Fax 952‐826‐0389| Cell 612‐363‐3564 jgilgenbach@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Kristin Engman [mailto:kristinengman@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 2:06 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Nordic ski trails at Braemar Dear Edina City Council Members: I am an Edina High School Nordic Ski Team parent and am writing to you to ask that you consider voting "YES" to snowmaking and ski trails at Braemar. As a self taught skier and avid outdoor enthusiast, I believe that having a ski trail at Braemar would highly benefit our community during the winter months. Nordic skiing is an activity that can be enjoyed by various ages and abilities and is an excellent family activity. The trails below the high school were excellent for the high school team and also other residents to use and enjoy. Now that they are being taken away due to the bike trail, another option should be presented by the Council. Thank you in advance for your vote as "YES" for the Nordic ski trail at Braemar. Sincerely, Kristin Engman Edina Resident, Parent and Nordic ski team volunteer 2 Heather Branigin From:Jen Rolfes <jenrlfs@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:36 PM To:Edina Mail Cc:Ruth Rolfes Subject:Edina City Council: Braemar Project Comments Hi City Council, My name is Jennifer Rolfes. I cross country skied on the Edina High School Nordic team from 2004-2010 and live two blocks from Braemar. I support the project to create trails and snowtubing at Braemar. I wanted to provide a response to the worries of some of the Park Board members regarding traffic and lights. It is true that Elm Creek is often overrun with traffic. There are a number of differences though which lead me to believe that the traffic would not be an issue at Braemar. The nearest location to Elm Creek that makes snow is 17 miles away at Theodore Wirth. In contrast,Braemar is within 5 miles of the snow-making facilities at Hyland Park Reserve. Furthermore, the snow-making loop at Braemar will be smaller than both Elm Creek and Hyland. I believe that as far as cross country skiing is concerned, Braemar will be used principally by Edina residents. Unless construction is planned to make the hill at Braemar bigger, it is far smaller than the snowtubing hill at Elm Creek. This combination of factors leads me to believe that traffic at Braemar will not be out of control. As long as the lights on the snowtubing hill are off by 9 pm on weekdays and 10 pm on weekends, I do not understand the concerns regarding the lighting at Braemar. At present, there are trees between the hill and the closest houses on Gleason. More trees could be planted closer to the road as necessary to help block the light. As long as the lights aren't on late, it shouldn't interfere with sleep in those houses. For the houses located further north on Gleason, the lit hill might not be as aesthetically pleasing as the dark golf course, but it does not interfere with the use of their property. During the summer, when they are more likely to be sitting on their front lawns in the evening, the lights will not be operating. Thank you, Jennifer Rolfes 7675 Woodview Ct Edina, MN 55439 3 Heather Branigin From:Jay at TeeMaster <jay@teemaster.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:34 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Winter Park Project Dear City Council, My name is Jay Adams. I live in Edina at 5801 Bernard Place. I grew up in Edina and have raised my children here. I want to ask that you all vote yes to move forward with the Braemar Winter Park Project. I have been a highly competitive Nordic skier for close to 30 years and over that time the winter weather has been inconsistent and that has made natural snow trail conditions very inconsistent. The man‐made snow at the Hyland downhill area became open to Nordic skiers about 10 years ago which was awesome. Then a couple years ago they added the snow making to the Hyland Nordic trails and currently those trails are the best man‐made snow trails in the nation. Theodore Wirth Park has also added snow‐making with success. As a resident of Edina and promoter of Nordic skiing I have been very discouraged by the rigid rules regarding access to the man‐made snow trails at Hyland for youth skiers. The rules virtually prohibit our high school team from practicing there as a team, which I find completely bewildering, but it’s the way it is. The excellent volunteers working with the high school team have developed ski trails down below the high school utilizing the fields and hills by Creek Valley but those options are now being eliminated with the new fields and nine‐mile trail construction. The Breamar proposal will provide our residents and high school team the opportunity to ski within our community and that will be such a great option for all. I love the Hyland and Wirth trails, but if we can have something of competitive quality and consistency here, our community will be that much better. So please vote yes on the proposal. If any of you would like to discuss Nordic skiing and trail issues further, I do consider myself an expert on the subject as I have over 10,000 kilometers and years of experience on the matter and would love to chat with you about it. Thank you and I am looking forward to seeing this project happen and being able to ski on great new trails at Braemar. Jay Adams 5801 Bernard Place jha@teemaster.com 612‐701‐6573 4 Heather Branigin From:Jeffrey Kuhs <jkuhs@ahintermediaries.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 12:20 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Edina Snow Making Dear Edina City Council representatives, Please consider supporting the snow making proposal for Braemar. I'm writing this from an airport so it will lack eloquence, but here it goes. We have put our money (and time) where our mouth is We (Edina High School Nordic Team) believe strongly in this effort. We have put our time and money into snowmaking for many years creating a community wide asset. Due to changes at the high school we need a new way forward. Nordic skiing at the high school allows ~200 kids to learn a life‐long sport, compete successfully at the highest levels in the state, and many other associated benefits. There is strong support from the Edina community for the sport and associated trails. Global weather patterns suggest the need for manmade snow will increase. With an already short season, Nordic skiing at this latitude could be threatened if we have a few consecutive dry/warm years. I'm sure you have heard this all before and understand the issues. Please vote yes on the proposal. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to contact me. Thanks for your consideration, Jeffrey Kuhs (Edina resident and lifelong Nordic skier, parent of EHS skiers) 5 Heather Branigin From:Anne Lindquist <lfamily7@earthlink.net> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 11:26 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:In support of Edina Snowmaking Proposal Dear City Council members, As a member of the Edina community and a parent of nordic skiers, I am in strong support of the proposed plan to add snowmaking capabilities and ski trail grooming to Braemar. The nordic ski trails would be an excellent addition to our school and city. Anne Lindquist 6 Heather Branigin From:Suzanne Magner <smagner@loganconsulting.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 9:35 AM To:Edina Mail Cc:Guy Logan; 'Suzanne Logan (suzannelogan@yahoo.com)' Subject:Nordic Skiing Trails/Snow Making at Braemar Dear City Council – Based on the below, we would be in agreement of the need for additional Nordic trails in Edina to not only support the EHS teams, but to support many in the community that enjoy this potentially life‐long activity. I believe the boys and girls EHS teams are seeing record numbers of an important no‐cut sport for the school and the teams are enjoying success. Always nice to support all sports in the community, especially those that get us out more during our long winters!! Edina has invested a lot of money in hockey, skating rinks/warming houses, Braemar dome, golf dome, golf course, soccer fields, playgrounds, tennis courts, etc., making it a great place to live. Nordic skiing seems to be another opportunity to do this as there seems to be a need to support a sport that appeals to many generations. Thank you ‐ Suzanne & Guy Logan 5806 Olinger Road Edina, MN 55436 From: edina-nordic@googlegroups.com [mailto:edina-nordic@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Edina Nordic Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 10:19 AM To: edina nordic@googlegroups.com Subject: Edina Snowmaking Proposal! Dear Edina Nordic Families, Action requested: if you are in support of this, please contact your city council representative immediately via email mail@edinamn.gov Be sure to write a sentence or two about why you support this. This is an urgent message regarding an upcoming City Council vote. We are hoping you can indicate your support of this issue by sending an email immediately. The vote is this coming Tuesday, May 17! Please read this email and take action immediately if you are in agreement. 7 The City Council is considering adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar. If the vote passes, this would give us an excellent opportunity to be able to ski some place other than, or in addition to EHS. We are definitely in favor of having more options than we do currently. Today we are able to make snow and ski several kilometers of trail at EHS. This will change significantly after the 2016‐17 season. Nine Mile Creek trail is under construction and this will dramatically affect our ability to hold ski practices at the high school. A bridge will be added crossing highway 62 taking out important hill trails by the water tower. We currently enjoy 5km of trails at the high school, but the regional trail will cross our ski trails many times, and when the trail is plowed, our ski trails won’t be skiable anymore. A new accessibility path will be built from the parking lot of EHS to the lower fields. This will be plowed in the winter, so we will not be able to ski in the area by the tennis courts anymore. Additionally, we will be losing some of our ski space (tennis court area, restored prairie hill, and behind the bunker). We all know that we are currently very lucky to have several key volunteers who do our snowmaking at EHS. This is hard work that could be taken over by the City of Edina at Braemar Park. It is very difficult to obtain permission to hold practices at Hyland. Currently we can plan on about 1 practice slot per week. For these reasons, it would be nice to see Braemar add snowmaking and some Nordic trails. If you are in agreement, please send an email to the following address immediately: mail@edinamn.gov Your email will be sent to all of the City Council members automatically. Explain how this will impact your family and the community ‐‐ having more winter recreation opportunities right here in Edina would be great! From Skinnyski.com: (Submitted by Craig Jarvinen) 8 Edina Snowmaking Proposal April 12, 2016 Edina is considering a snowmaking operation at Braemer Park. Early plans call for a [2.2 - 2.25km] snowmaking loop to be completed by December 2017. Review more details below by clicking on these links: - Proposal Background/Timeline - Winter Park at Braemer - Statement of Qualifications -- Edina Nordic Ski website: http://www.edinaschools.org/nordicski --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Edina Nordic" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to edina- nordic+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/edina-nordic. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/edina-nordic/CAPhakGq2wMGDw9mYgSDFzYXyA8N2kHARSWxNyZRvxJPJqQ2Knw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 9 Heather Branigin From:Jean RehkampLarson <jean@rehkamplarson.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 8:42 AM To:Edina Mail Cc:Mark Larson Subject:groomed trails at Braemar We are in favor of the plan to groom trails at Braemar. The last seasons have been challenging for Nordic skiers to get trail time. Nordic skiing is a lifelong sport ‐ people of all ages enjoy it. When kids start young they take the skill and the love of the outdoors forward throughout their lives. Best, Jean and Mark Larson 10 Heather Branigin From:Louis M. Mansky <mansky@umn.edu> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 8:11 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Revisit of sidewalk addition to Woodland Road West To: Edina City Council Re: Revisit of sidewalk addition to Woodland Road West Please DO NOT add a sidewalk to Woodland Road West without future analyses of pedestrian needs on existing/new sidewalks in the neighborhood ‐ In January, the Edina City Council voted to create space on the south side of Woodland Road West for a future sidewalk and approved installation of a sidewalk on 56th Street. ‐ Recent resident petitions requested addition of a sidewalk to Tower Street. Council approved a motion to add a sidewalk to Tower St. ‐ Another resident petition requests that the possibility of adding a sidewalk on the southside of Woodland Road West be installed now and not wait to resurvey to determine if there is a need. ‐ Please refrain from revisiting sidewalk installation on Woodland Road West. New sidewalks on the 2 streets to the north (ie, Tower Street, 56th Street) and an existing sidewalk to the south (ie, 58th Street) could obviate the need to ever install a sidewalk on Woodland Road West. ‐ The original analysis of need was based on a December survey. The effects of the new sidewalks on pedestrian traffic patterns needs to be analyzed with the sidewalks on Tower and 56th St in order to determine if there is a legitimate need for yet another sidewalk installed in this neighborhood on Woodland Road West. ‐ There remains concerns about a sidewalk on Woodland Road West, particularly on which side of the road would be best. While the southside was chosen because of the estimates of minimal install cost, the northside of the street is ultimately better for safety (a point of discussion that City Council did not consider). 11 ‐ The north side of Woodland Road West allows direct access to the bus stop at Wooddale Ave; crossing Concord Ave would be most safely done at the stop sign at the intersection of Concord Ave and Southview Ln. ‐ The currently existing sidewalk crossing at the intersection of Woodland Rd West and Concord Ave is not the safest location to cross the street. Installing a sidewalk on the southside of Woodland Rd West, does not make the crossing safer; if anything it makes it less safe by encouraging more pedestrian traffic. ‐ A sidewalk on the southside of Woodland Rd West would remain in the shade during the winter months, and even if cleared of snow, would be covered in a glaze of ice that would make such a sidewalk a perpetual safety hazard. ‐ Council is also asked to postpone sidewalk installation to consider progress made in Holland, MIchigan in improving the life of its citizens by the installation of heated sidewalks (see link below to story recently on Michigan Public Radio). Please note that install of pipes below sidewalk is a small investment, and many new eco‐friendly technologies exist (eg, solar energy) for providing the energy for heated water. Council is asked to consider this possibility for a future sidewalk on Woodland Road West, particularly if it is installed on the southside of the street. http://michiganradio.org/post/hollands‐heated‐sidewalks‐streets‐were‐gamble‐seems‐have‐paid#stream/0 - Given the unusually large number of ongoing and soon to start construction projects this summer in the City of Edina, please do not overextend beyond the current financial commitments, which could easily overrun the available budget. ‐ Please do not reverse your previous decision! Louis Mansky 5701 Fairfax Avenue Email: mansky@umn.edu 12 Heather Branigin From:Louis M. Mansky <mansky@umn.edu> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 8:06 AM To:Frank Petrovic Subject:Revisit of sidewalk addition to Woodland Road West ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Louis M. Mansky <mansky@umn.edu> Date: Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:04 AM Subject: Revisit of sidewalk addition to Woodland Road West To: Lynette Biunno <lbiunno@edinamn.gov> Good morning Lynette, Please forward to the Mayor and City Council. Have a good day! Louis ‐‐‐ To: Edina City Council Re: Revisit of sidewalk addition to Woodland Road West Please DO NOT add a sidewalk to Woodland Road West without future analyses of pedestrian needs on existing/new sidewalks in the neighborhood ‐ In January, the Edina City Council voted to create space on the south side of Woodland Road West for a future sidewalk and approved installation of a sidewalk on 56th Street. ‐ Recent resident petitions requested addition of a sidewalk to Tower Street. Council approved a motion to add a sidewalk to Tower St. 13 ‐ Another resident petition requests that the possibility of adding a sidewalk on the southside of Woodland Road West be installed now and not wait to resurvey to determine if there is a need. ‐ Please refrain from revisiting sidewalk installation on Woodland Road West. New sidewalks on the 2 streets to the north (ie, Tower Street, 56th Street) and an existing sidewalk to the south (ie, 58th Street) could obviate the need to ever install a sidewalk on Woodland Road West. ‐ The original analysis of need was based on a December survey. The effects of the new sidewalks on pedestrian traffic patterns needs to be analyzed with the sidewalks on Tower and 56th St in order to determine if there is a legitimate need for yet another sidewalk installed in this neighborhood on Woodland Road West. ‐ There remains concerns about a sidewalk on Woodland Road West, particularly on which side of the road would be best. While the southside was chosen because of the estimates of minimal install cost, the northside of the street is ultimately better for safety (a point of discussion that City Council did not consider). ‐ The north side of Woodland Road West allows direct access to the bus stop at Wooddale Ave; crossing Concord Ave would be most safely done at the stop sign at the intersection of Concord Ave and Southview Ln. ‐ The currently existing sidewalk crossing at the intersection of Woodland Rd West and Concord Ave is not the safest location to cross the street. Installing a sidewalk on the southside of Woodland Rd West, does not make the crossing safer; if anything it makes it less safe by encouraging more pedestrian traffic. ‐ A sidewalk on the southside of Woodland Rd West would remain in the shade during the winter months, and even if cleared of snow, would be covered in a glaze of ice that would make such a sidewalk a perpetual safety hazard. ‐ Council is asked to postpone sidewalk installation to consider progress made in Holland, MIchigan in improving the life of its citizens by the installation of heated sidewalks (see link below to story recently on Michigan Public Radio). Please note that install of pipes below sidewalk is a small investment, and many new eco‐friendly technologies exist (eg, solar energy) for providing the energy for heated water. Council is asked to consider this possibility for a future sidewalk on Woodland Road West, particularly if it is installed on the southside of the street. http://michiganradio.org/post/hollands‐heated‐sidewalks‐streets‐were‐gamble‐seems‐have‐paid#stream/0 - Given the unusually large number of ongoing and soon to start construction projects this summer in the City of Edina, please do not overextend beyond the current financial commitments, which could easily overrun the available budget. 14 ‐ Please do not reverse your previous decision! Louis Mansky 5701 Fairfax Avenue Email: mansky@umn.edu 15 Heather Branigin From:MaggieE-mail <mmbraun6@comcast.net> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 8:00 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Please vote yes to adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar Dear City Council, We are strongly encouraging you to add snowmaking and Nordic trails at Braemar. Our daughter(and youngest of our 4 children), has been a member of the Nordic Ski team for the last two years. The Edina Nordic team is one of the most all‐ inclusive and supportive teams we have seen in the Edina schools. Their coaches have been dedicated to supporting this program in many ways, including snowmaking at EHS. With the construction and changes at the high school there will not be a place for this all‐inclusive team. Please vote yes to adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar for this team. Also, Nordic Skiing is a life time, healthy sport. We enjoy it ourselves and feel strongly that it would be a wonderful addition to our community. Again, please vote yes to adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar for our community. Thank you. Maggie and Karl Braun 16 Heather Branigin From:Danberntson@gmail.com Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 3:37 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Contact Us form submission Name: Dan Berntson Organization: Website: Address_1: 6728 point dr Address_2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55435 Email: Danberntson@gmail.com Phone: 952-279-6589 Referrer: google Message: To Edina City Council Re: Braemar Winter Park My family strongly supports the development of a cross country ski trail at Braemar. Each winter I ski five or six days a week and would enjoy using a trail at Braemar because it's close than Hyland Park in Bloomington or Worth Park in Minneapolis. I have skied st Braemar in past years as a helper for the Edina High School ski team and would enjoy access to the beautiful winter terrain again. Please vote in favor of developing the ski trail in Edina. Respectfully, Dan Berntson 17 Heather Branigin From:sshowe@comcast.net Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 7:06 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Proposed Braemar ski trails Good morning, I am writing in support of the proposed Nordic ski trails and snowmaking at Braemar. Not only would the middle school and high school Nordic ski teams have a home, the local Nordic community would have a location to enjoy as well. The construction at the high school will be taking away a large part of the current Nordic team trails. . Shelly Howe 18 Heather Branigin From:Jay Rudi <j.rudi@comcast.net> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:29 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Edina City Council --Snow making at Braemar To Edina City Council, I support the addition of snow making equipment to allow nordic/cross country skiing at Braemar. As Minnesotans, winter activities are important for the health of our citizens and add to our wonderful quality of life in Edina. I hope that you will support this addition to our community. Thank you. Jay Rudi 4708 Valley View Road, Edina, MN 55424 19 Heather Branigin From:Deb Carlson <debjcrlsn@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Nordic trails and snowmaking at Braemar Dear Council Members: I am writing to encourage you to vote in favor of trail grooming and snowmaking at Braemar. As a family with an EHS Nordic athlete, we think this will significantly enhance the training options for the team. In addition, this gives Edina residents a local opportunity for skiing as well. Thank you for your support of these efforts. Sincerely, Deb Carlson 20 Heather Branigin From:Ellen Jones <ellen.jones@me.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 11:55 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Grandview Task Force Citizen Member Summary Statement Attachments:Grandview Citizen Summary Statement.pdf Dear City Council, At the last Grandview Task Force meeting, the non-staff, non-consultant members of the Grandview Task Force agreed that their perspectives should be compiled into a summary statement. I volunteered to write the summary and the Task Force concurred. The attached statement is a compilation of feedback made by citizen members of the Task Force who participated in the process. It summarizes perspectives received both in and outside Task Force meetings. It expresses the view of individual members and is not intended to represent consensus, agreement or emphasis on any specific statement or statements. Sincerely, Ellen Jones 21 Heather Branigin From:clover graham <clovergraham@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 11:27 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:City council meeting tomorrow night Hello, I would like to speak at the city council meeting tomorrow night. Please let me know if there is a form I need to fill out? Thank you! Clover Hackett Sent from my iPhone 22 Heather Branigin From:Kristine Donatelle <donatellek@icloud.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 11:20 PM To:Charlie Gerk; Stephen Kartak Cc:Edina Mail Subject:5425 Woodcrest Drive variance work Attachments:image2.JPG; ATT00001.txt; image1.JPG; ATT00002.txt Dear city of Edina staff, The Ramsays' contractor Sorensen was still grading their driveway with heavy loud equipment (a bulldozer) at 10:30 pm tonight. Working at this hour is not only in violation of the city zoning and noise ordinance, it's a safety hazard for passengers and vehicles in the street. Not to mention the contractor cannot fully see what he is doing when it's pitch dark. This project is located too close to my property line to be grading this steep slope in the dark. The weather forecast is clear and dry for the entire next week so there should be no rush to get it in overnight. This is not the first time I have seen the Ramsays' contractors being inconsiderate and unsafe. Last month they cut down a huge dead tree on the south side of their property that was hovering over my roof. The tree needed to be removed because it was unsafe and completely dead. However, a live electrical wire intersected the tree branches. Their contractor proceeded to climb the tree and cut the tree branches directly above the wire without first calling the utility company to drop the wire & turn off the electricity. This was highly dangerous and put not only my property at risk, but the contractor's life as well because he was within just a few feet of the live wire. (See attached photos ‐ the live wire is hanging below the contractor). The live wire could have snapped and fell and caught on fire. I asked them to stop until the wire was dropped and they refused. I would like you to please advise the homeowner and contractor of the ordinance conditions regarding time restrictions and safety considerations for their work. I feel like these folks have cut too many corners throughout this entire project. Thank you, Kristine Donatelle 5427 Woodcrest Drive 23 Heather Branigin From:Elizabeth Ashbrook <beth.ashbrook@comcast.net> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 10:51 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar snow making I support Braemar making snow & ski trails. We have 3 kids at ehs who enjoy Nordic skiing. The team needs a place to practice. Regards, Beth & Steve Ashbrook. 24 Heather Branigin From:Jonathan Engman MD <engm0003@umn.edu> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 9:54 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Winter Planning Dear Edina City Council Members: I am an Edina business owner, resident and parent of 2 middle school kids. I am writing to ask you to consider voting “YES” to snowmaking and ski trails at Braemar. Edina is an exceptional community to live in largely due to the diverse opportunities we have here. Nordic skiing is one of those diverse opportunities to offer an enjoyable outdoor activity to our residents during the winter months. It is an activity for those who are young and old, competitive and non-competitive, and that almost everyone can do. Nordic ski trails at Braemar also would make use of the golf course that otherwise sits dormant during the winter months and drive business to the restaurant that is currently there. Almost all of the high school skiing is currently done on volunteer-made ski trails below the high school and over to Creek Valley elementary. Those trails will be cut up by the construction and installation of the Nine Mile Creek trail system as well as the construction at the high school. Those factors will essentially make the current Nordic trail system unworkable. Edina has had the unique opportunity to have its own nordic skiing trails due to the dedication of volunteers involved with the Edina Nordic Ski team. Without these or other trails the opportunity to have ~200 skiers on the team will be greatly diminished and our kids will be losing out on the opportunity to learn a sport that encourages healthy living. Thank you for your time and I hope you consider voting “YES” in tomorrow’s city council meeting in our continual effort to make Edina outstanding for our residents. Respectfully, 25 Jon Engman Edina resident, parent and Edina business owner. 26 Heather Branigin From:T Wagner <taramwagner@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 9:52 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Proposed Nordic ski trails at Braemar Golf Course-vote YES Dear Edina City Council Members: I am an Edina High School Nordic Ski Team parent and am writing to you to ask that you consider voting "YES" to snowmaking and ski trails at Braemar. As a self taught skier and avid outdoor enthusiast, I believe that having a ski trail at Braemar would highly benefit our community during the winter months. Nordic skiing is an activity that can be enjoyed by various ages and abilities and is an excellent family activity. Thank you for your consideration in voting "YES". Sincerely, Tara M. Wagner, DDS Edina Resident, Parent and Nordic ski team volunteer 27 Heather Branigin From:Liz Abt Ellenberger <lizabte@comcast.net> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 9:42 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Thumbs up for snowmaking at Braemar! I'm a late‐onset skier, spurred on by my Nordic skiing sons. What a great lifelong sport. Unfortunately we can no longer count on snow from the sky in MN winters. Please consider snowmaking at Braemar. It's an excellent off‐season use of that real estate. And would keep residents health & happy. Thanks, Liz Abt Ellenberger 6929 Dakota Trail Sent from my iPhone 28 Heather Branigin From:Tom & Tara Wagner <tntwagner@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 9:35 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Winter snow-making and Nordic ski trails - vote yes Dear Edina City Council Members: I am an Edina High School Nordic Ski Team parent (volunteer) and former U.S. Nordic Ski Team member (1990‐93). I am writing you to ask you to consider voting “YES” to snowmaking and ski trails at Braemar. Edina is an exceptional community to live in largely due to the diverse opportunities we have here. Nordic skiing is one of those diverse opportunities to offer an enjoyable outdoor activity to our residents during the winter months. It is an activity for those who are young and old, competitive and non‐competitive, and that almost everyone can do. Nordic ski trails at Braemar also would make use of the golf course that otherwise sits dormant during the winter months. As a young Nordic skier I recall having to drive 2‐4 hours on weekends to find enough snow to ski on, only to have to drive back home for a week of dryland training (running) before returning to snow again the next weekend. We also have a unique opportunity within our community to support our young aspiring Nordic skiers that ski for the high school team. Nordic skiing is currently a “no‐cut” sport at Edina. While the teams are competitive they also offer the ability for a beginner to join the team and learn to ski. Almost all of the high school skiing is currently done on volunteer‐made ski trails below the high school and over to Creek Valley elementary. Those trails will be cut up by the construction and installation of the Nine Mile Creek trail system as well as the construction at the high school. Those factors will essentially make the current Nordic trail system unworkable. Without these or other trails the opportunity to have ~200 skiers on the team will be greatly diminished. I thank you for your time and hope you consider voting “YES” in tomorrow’s city council meeting. Respectfully, Tom Wagner Edina resident, Parent, and Nordic ski team volunteer coach Sent from Mail for Windows 10 29 Heather Branigin From:mendelco@aol.com Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 9:32 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Nordic Trails at Braemar To whom it may concern, We support the adding of snow making capabilities at Braemar for the following reasons: Nine Mile Creek trail is under construction, and this will dramatically affect our ability to hold ski practices at Edina High school. A bridge will be added crossing highway 62 taking out important hill trails by the water tower. We currently enjoy 5km of trails at the high school, but the regional trail will cross our ski trails many times, and when the trail is plowed, our ski trails won’t be skiable anymore. A new accessibility path will be build from the parking lot of EHS to the lower fields. This will be plowed in the winter, so we will not be able to ski in the area by the tennis courts anymore. Additionally, we will be losing some of our ski space (tennis court area, restored prairie hill, and behind the bunker). It is very difficult to obtain permission to hold practices at Hyland. Currently we can plan on about 1 practice slot per week. For these reasons, it would be nice to see Braemar add snowmaking and some Nordic trails. Thank you for your consideration, Nancy and Rob Mendel 30 Heather Branigin From:Elizabeth Burnett <eburnettmail@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 9:31 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Nordic ski trails at Braemar Dear City Council members, Please vote in favor of adding ski trails at Braemar. We are huge fans of cross-country skiing, with two children on the EHS Nordic team and another soon there. In addition, we love to ski recreationally as a family. Cross-country skiing is such a terrific winter activity for all ages, all abilities. Having ski trails accessible to the community would be a huge asset to Edina. We truly appreciate your support on this issue. Sincerely, Elizabeth Burnett and Adam Mans Abby, Henry, and Peter Mans 31 Heather Branigin From:joshriff@gmail.com Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 9:00 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar snow making I am an Edina resident and in support of the Braemar snow making efforts. I moved to Edina 8 years ago when I was recruited to Target from Tucson and did not plan on staying long due to the long winter. Since moving here I have fallen in love with winter sports and through the phenomenal Minneapolis parks department such as wirth park has made Minneapolis a wonderful place to live. I am committed to making my three children outdoor enthusiasts and having access to winter sports at braemar would be a wonderful addition. I support snowmaking efforts Joshua Riff, MD 7116 Lanham Lane Edina MN 55439 32 Heather Branigin From:Jennifer <jenriff@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 8:58 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar snow making This would be just another way to ensure our family is outside and active year round. Please do this! Jen Riff 7116 lanham lane Edina mn 55439 Sent from my iPhone 33 Heather Branigin From:Paul Arbisi <arbis001@umn.edu> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 7:27 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:support of proposed snow making at Braemar Edina City Council, I am writing in strong support of adding snowmaking to the proposed 2.5Km Nordic ski trail at Braemar. As a 22 year Edina resident, avid nordic skier and runner, and a former parent coach of the Edina High School Nordic Ski team, I can not emphasize enough the importance of providing the opportunity for Edina residents of all ages to ski at Braemar. Given the uncertainty of Minnesota winters, having the capacity to make snow at Braemar will assure continued utilization of the park throughout the winter months and promote health and wellness for Edina residents of all ages. Regards, Paul A. Arbisi 4632 Arden Ave Edina, MN 55424 34 Heather Branigin From:Bastian, Ben @ Minneapolis <Ben.Bastian@cbre.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 7:17 PM To:Edina Mail; rep.ron.erhardt@house.mn; James Hovland; Ann Kattreh; sharon.kroening@state.mn.us; nancy.flandrick@state.mn.us; lynda.nelson@state.mn.us; jean.garvin@state.mn.us; John.Stine@state.mn.us; Glenn.Skuta@state.mn.us; admin@minnehahacreek.org; kdooley@minnehahacreek.org; jwisker@minnehahacreek.org; aswanson@minnehahacreek.org; mark.dayton@state.mn.us; rep.matt.dean@house.mn; rep.denny.mcnamara@house.mn; rep.joe.mcdonald@house.mn; rep.tina.liebling@house.mn; rep.diane.loeffler@house.mn; rep.dan.fabian@house.mn; rep.rick.hansen@house.mn Subject:Edina Crumb Rubber Turf Fields - Minnehaha Creek Water Contamination Risk Importance:High Good evening, Before I start, thank you for your time and understanding of this serious issue. You’ll see I’ve included several people on this email – please don’t assume someone else will do something, please respond and help yourself. I look forward to working together to make wiser decisions for our kids, future generations and the environment. Thank you. I recently learned of the toxic and harmful substances that make up these new Crumb Rubber Turf playing fields that have been popular and hot sellers for cities around the country. At first, I thought this makes sense to recycle old tires and there’d be less or no maintenance, soft on the kids’ joints, etc. But it seems clear that several government agencies and reliable sources aren’t so sure these playing fields are safe, at best, if not dangerous. Please conduct more studies and environmental research. Once their useful life expires, the components can’t be thrown out – they need professional remediation and proper disposal. WAIT, WHAT?! And our kids were playing on these for years? One week they’re soccer/football/lacrosse/etc. fields, and when they reach the end of their lifecycle (only 7‐10 years), the next week a team in protective suits are needed to remove the hazardous material. How can anyone think that makes sense. Edina is the premier city in the metro, and one of the best in the nation in so many categories. Don’t be a follower, please continue our history of leading, being first in class and a thought leader. Please buck this trend that these fields are the best thing and every city needs them. Please listen to parents. Here’s a good summary I just read. Please, please, please don’t move forward – until they are deemed safe by all reports, not just a bias report the manufacturer/installer has. At a minimum wait for the Environmental Protection Agency report examining the potential health effects; a draft status report is expected in late 2016. http://www.sd49gop.com/edina_board_can_t_wait_for_crumb_rubber_turf?utm_campaign=may2016_week1&utm_m edium=email&utm_source=btw For the Edina officials/employees on this email, I’ll end with my quick Edina background: I graduated from Edina High School in 2001, I was raised in Edina and went all K‐12 at our wonderful public schools. I grew up playing several sports on real grass, like kids are supposed to. I moved back to Edina with my wife (also Edina ’01) and our two kids, one and four. I love Edina. We chose to move back because of several reasons, public schools, home values, parks, community, 35 location, etc. A big reason was I thought the city would listen to residents/taxpayers/parents on important issues – there is no more important issue than the safety of our children. Again, listen to us, hear our concerns. Further due diligence is warranted. House Members: I’ve added Ron Erhardt from my district and those on committees who should look further into these fields ‐ Environment and Natural Resources Policy and Finance & Health and Human Services Finance Membership. MPCA and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Employees: Please open a ticket for groundwater investigation and monitoring of the Minnehaha Water Shed District around all the Edina fields. I’d imagine there are volatile organic compounds being used. Please do whatever you can to withdraw Edina’s plans for more of these fields, or at a minimum require further testing. I along with thousands of parents and taxpayers want further investigation into the safety of the water system and negative impacts these fields have on our environment. Thanks for your time and consideration – sorry this got so long. Ben Ben Bastian | Vice President Debt & Structured Finance CBRE | Capital Markets 81 South 9th Street, Suite 400 | Minneapolis, MN 55402 T +1 612 336 4233 | C +1 952 250 0779 | F +1 612 336 4352 ben.bastian@cbre.com | www.cbre.com/cm-minneapolis Recent CBRE DSF in the News: Real Estate Journal – Minneapolis CBD Apartment Building CoStar Group - 38,000 SF Office Building CBRE Press Release - $5.8M Retail Portfolio Finance & Commerce - $49.6M Office Building Connect with me on LinkedIn This message and any attachments may be privileged, confidential or proprietary. If you are not the intended recipient of this email or believe that you have received this correspondence in error, please contact the sender through the information provided above and permanently delete this message. 36 Heather Branigin From:Lisa Hollensteiner <hollensteinerlisa@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 4:21 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar snowmaking Hello-I am writing in support of snow making at Braemar. The team has over 200 members, and I understand have had to turn away some students. Our town and schools should support the infrastructure needed to support our teams. The football and soccer teams have fields, and likewise, the ski team should have snow covered trails. Hyland can only accommodate our team about once a week, which leaves many days where the team still needs facilities. The Nine Mile Creek trail is wonderful, but will unfortunately interfere with the current ski trails. Please pass funding for snow making at Braemar. Thank you. Lisa Hollensteiner 37 Heather Branigin From:Gibbs, John <John_Gibbs@cable.comcast.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 1:59 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snowmaking at Braemar Mayor Hovland and members of the City Council: I have had occasion to review the plan and considerations for nordic trail snowmaking at the reinvigorated Braemar. Having been involved with nordic facilities policy at Three Rivers as the elected Commissioner from for District 5 (Bloomington, Eden Prairie and SE Richfield) I have seen the positive outcomes from the Nordic efforts at Hyland and really believe that snowmaking at Braemar will be well utilized, a special feature in attracting high school youth to the activity and well worth serious consideration. At Hyland, the investment has been an unqualified success and I am convinced that Braemar facilities would be well used. John Gibbs Cell: 651‐324‐0874 38 Heather Branigin From:Erica.J.Klausen@wellsfargo.com Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 1:57 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:snow making for the Breaemar Please strongly considering this great opportunity of snow making for our community. I think the current skier and the gigantic student body we have involved in this sport is a great opportunity for us. As a skier I love to encourage our community to take on any new health activities that promote involvement and fitness. This is only a benefit as we as tax payers would like to see something productive being done with our money. Erica Klausen 39 Heather Branigin From:Jane Wang <janewang.cao@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 1:50 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Ski trail at Braemar Hello, This email is to support adding a ski trail at Braemar since the EHS ski trail will be unavailable soon. My son is an 8th grader. He really enjoyed the nordic ski in the past season which was his first season. He told me that he could do better next season. I hope the city could give him and other kids the opportunity to exercise and improve their skills as a group everyday. This would help build up these young men/women physically, mentally, and provide social opportunities. I had to say if they don't have these social opportunities, a lot of them will be submerged into their virtual social world with their computers/phones which is what I really concerned. Thank you, Wenjuan Wang 40 Heather Branigin From:Nancy Sinykin <nsinyk@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 1:23 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar vote for snowmaking and trail grooming We would like to support the vote for snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar Golf Course. Could you please pass this on to the City Council. The students in Edina will benefit greatly. Thanks, Nancy & Rich Sinykin 41 Heather Branigin From:Braun, Karl O <Karl.Braun@CliffsNR.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:59 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Comment re - Winter Braemar GC Utilization - May 17, 2016 Meeting I currently use the Braemar GC in the winter for XC skiing when the snow conditions are good enough. I enjoy the fact it is free and I can take my dog. Although I do not relish the thought of loosing the ability to take the dog, well maintained dedicated XC trails with ample man‐made snow that are wide enough for both diagonal track and groomed skate skiing would be well used by both the general public and high school XC ski team. The current construction changes to Edina High School are eliminating XC ski practice areas for the XC Ski Team. Currently, the Braemar winter trail accommodates mostly walkers and some XC skiers. The trail gets groomed depending on snow conditions. The trail is not very good for traditional or diagonal stride because there is not set track, but given occasional grooming, it is mostly OK for skate skiing despite people walking on it. A trail that benefits from man‐made snow would need to be only for XC skiing – i.e. no walking on it – there is no point to make snow for a walking trail. Thus an alternate walking path would have to be made, or area for free‐field (no path) walking needs to be available to accommodate (serve) the community members who enjoy walking the course in the winter months (there are quite a few). I was somewhat skeptical of the viability of man‐made snow for XC skiing until I saw it effectively and very successfully deployed at Highlands. I’m sure it is quite expensive to install and operate a snow making setup but Highland gets heavy use and makes XC skiing possible even during warm winters. I am for investigating the addition of snow‐making at Braemar but would like to see plan details made public before going forward. The current situation of it being relatively low cost to groom natural snow and free for public use is hard to beat. Yet it has potential to become a reliable XC ski facility for the high school and public. Regards, Karl Braun 5833 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ This electronic message and any attachments included with this message are for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged or confidential and thereby exempt and protected from unauthorized disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, or the use of its contents, is not authorized and is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication and are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original message from your e-mail system. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 42 Heather Branigin From:Rong Zheng <rongzheng@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:57 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Support adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar Dear Sir/Madam, Our family supports adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar as having more winter recreation opportunities right here in Edina would be great! Thanks Rong 43 Heather Branigin From:Sarah Hage <sarahhage@usfamily.net> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:45 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:snowmaking and grooming at Braemar Dear City Council: I hope you vote to support adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar. As a family who enjoys cross‐country skiing, our closest groomed public venue is at Woodland Nature Center in Richfield. We would LOVE to have something closer, as I’m sure many other families would. Also, I have a daughter on the Edina high school nordic team. They are very limited in the availability to ski nearby. The (very short) trail they’ve made on the school grounds will also be greatly affected by future construction with Highway 62 and Nine‐Mile Creek. Hyland only allows the team to practice there about once a week. It’s great to have healthy winter exercise choices. Please vote tomorrow for the added snowmaking and trailgrooming at Braemar. Thank you. Sincerely, Sarah Hage 4608 Woodland Rd W 44 Heather Branigin From:Frenkel, Ellen <ellen.frenkel@medtronic.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:40 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:nordic @ braemar Please support the establishment of Nordic ski trails at Braemar!! Thank you [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser: http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com 45 Heather Branigin From:Steven Howe <showe@HNTB.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:26 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Cross Country Ski Trails at Braemar I am writing to support the proposal that is being considered to provide snowmaking and cross country ski trails at Braemar. There are nearly 300 nordic skiers in the middle school and high school Nordic programs that would use this facility all winter. These skiers are currently skiing on man made snow created by an all volunteer group near the high school. The high school trails will be interrupted by the new nine‐mile creek multi‐use trail making it much more difficult to retain in the current location. Nordic ski trails are an amenity that can and are enjoyed by a large cross section of our residents. Snow making and grooming make them a predictable amenity that allows everyone to enjoy them. As a resident of Edina, I highly encourage the council to support this proposal. Steve Howe 5169 Abercrombie Drive Edina, MN 55439 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient and receive this communication, please delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. 46 Heather Branigin From:michelle horan <mhoran00@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:19 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:snow making at braemar I love to cross county ski and I support snow making equipment for cross country ski trails at Braemar!!! Michelle Horan 47 Heather Branigin From:Mosborg, Carri A <Carri.Mosborg@allina.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:18 PM To:Edina Mail Cc:'Anne Hinrichs' Subject:Snowmaking & Trail Grooming at Braemar Dear Edina City Council Members: I am writing to say I wholeheartedly support this proposal and hope that it is approved. While a death in the family made it necessary for us to move from Edina to Bloomington last summer, my daughter still attends Edina High School (junior this year) and participates in varsity track, cross country and Nordic. She was one of the team members who competed at the State Nordic meet last year (you may know that it was the first time the Edina girls team had qualified for State in several decades). I am newly aware of the amount of ski trails near Edina High School that will be lost as a result of construction at Nine Mile Creek, etc., and that is worrisome. New trails and snowmaking at Braemar would be a wonderfully positive addition to the community and help keep our teens involved in healthy activity/competition. Thank you for your consideration and all that you do! Carri Mosborg Executive Assistant • Allina Health Group Phone: 612-262-5204 • Fax: 612-262-4091 • carri.mosborg@allina.com Mail Route 10307 • 2925 Chicago Avenue • Minneapolis, MN 55407-1321 Executive Assistant to: Earl Beitzel, Vice President, Finance & Business Development Tim Grote, Director, Facilities Management Finance Directors: Kim Dembsky, Steve Drake, Bob Peterson, Diane Soderstrom Coordinator for: Primary Care Operations Meeting (PCOM) Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. This message contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. 48 Heather Branigin From:daniel and cheryl dulas <dulas001@msn.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:14 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snowmaking and Trail Grooming at Braemar Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council members, I support the snowmaking and trail grooming proposal at Braemar Park being discussed at the City Council meeting tomorrow night. This proposal will provide additional winter recreational opportunities for Edina residents, and importantly, will benefit Edina High School students who participate on the Nordic ski team (a team of about 200 students, a non‐cut sport). With the construction at the high school, this coming season's ski practices at EHS will be limited. Since it is difficult to secure practice times at Hyland Nordic Ski area (we currently have one practice slot per week), having the option of conveniently‐located Braemar Park for ski practices. This will enhance the team's ability to teach new skiers and build the team, as well as enable the coaches to train and prepare the more experienced Nordic skiers for State. Note that last season, the EHS girls' varsity team qualified for the State Meet, and two boys qualified for individual spots at State. In summary, I am in favor of the proposal, and thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Warmly, Cheryl Dulas 4609 Bruce Avenue Edina, MN 55424 49 Heather Branigin From:Amanda Cofield <cofield1@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:10 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:New Ski Trails at Braemar To Whom it May Concern: I am in support of adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar. My son is active with the Edina Nordic team. We would enjoy more ski options within Edina. Please contact me with any questions on why we support this. Thank you, Amanda Cofield 952-288-5637 50 Heather Branigin From:slebakken@gmail.com on behalf of Sue Lebakken <sue@lebakken.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:06 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Ski trail and snowmaking at Braemar - Yes! To all city council members, We are writing on behalf of our freshman daughter who is an Edina Nordic skier. With ski time at a premium in all of the current parks, and Edina high school's limitations due to the upcoming construction, we strongly encourage you to vote on adding trails and snowmaking at Braemar. This would greatly benefit the Edina Nordic team and the overall ski community that are all fighting for practice time for their skiers. The ability to make our own snow and have a guaranteed place to practice would be invaluable to the team as they aim for the state title. Regards, Sue and Craig Lebakken 51 Heather Branigin From:Robert Syring <rsyring796@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:03 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snowmaking at Braemar Hello, My name is Bob Syring and I live in Edina (4117 Kipling). I would strongly support the proposed snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar. As a father, Nordic youth ski coach and a competitive skier I think this type of facility would greatly enhance our utilization and enjoyment of the Braemar land and facilities in Edina during the winter months. I know that my young skiers and my family would make regular use of those trails, especially in low snow years. Thank you for your consideration. Bob Syring 52 Heather Branigin From:Laura and Jim Rubin <LJRubin@msn.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 12:02 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snowmaking at Braemar!!! As a parent of 2 kids in Nordic skiing at Edina, I would love to see more snow making! The proposal to add snowmaking at Braemar is a great one! My son, PJ, just lettered as a 9th grader. He is rowing this summer as a complementary sport so he will be strong for this upcoming winter. He and his teammates also will be doing LNR roller skiing this summer to prepare for skiing. More options for snow would greatly benefit PJ and his hardworking teammates this winter! They have big goals! I have a 7th grader who skied last winter and hope that my 5th grader will ski in the future. My 11th grade daughter also skied one season. Thanks for the consideration!! Laura (and Jim) Rubin 53 Heather Branigin From:Shand, Tracy <tshand@maharam.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 11:57 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar HI! Please consider voting for snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar. If the vote passes, this would give us an excellent opportunity to enjoy more winter recreation opportunities right here in Edina. Thanks! Tracy t shand 54 Heather Branigin From:Craig Brandt <craig.brandt@snyderattorneys.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 11:55 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Nordic ski trials at Braemar As an Edina resident I strongly favor developing cross country ski trails with snowmaking at Braemar. The Edina Nordic ski program is booming. Both these athletes and the community at large would benefit from developing X/C ski trails at the Braemar facility, which is underused in the winter. Please support this initiative. Craig Brandt 6524 Nordic Dr. Edina 55 Heather Branigin From:mpds@visi.com Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 10:57 AM To:FairSkies (Steve Kittleson); Loren Olson; Edina Mail Cc:MJ Lamon Subject:Edina Forum -- Kirsch Mayor Hovland, CM Swenson, Mr. Neal, Ms. Olson, Mr. Kittleson: On behalf of the Board and Members o f the Sou th Metropolitan Airport Action Council, Congratulations on the Forum. It is well that the City is seeking to inform its government and citizens about legal avenues possibly available to seek relief from commercial jet overflights. One question worth asking would be: "What are the statutory under-pinnings, if any, of the FAA's Efficiency Policy?" We coul d find no applicable clause in CFR-14 or PL 112-95 but FAA nowdays usually says "safety and efficiency" where before 2008 thay said "safety" as the goal for ATC systems and airspace management. [[As Hubert Humphrey used to say, I can prepare a 3 hour speech in 10 minutes but preparing a 10 minute speech takes days. Applies to this message.]] You recall, I'm sure, that overflights became more noticeable over Edina after runway use plans and ATC procedures were changed in late 2010 as a result of a near-mid-air collision. Because the incident was observed as an FAA ATCT mishap, the NTSB investigated, and the ATCT Manager, Carl Rydeen, immediately revised Tower procedures to "reduce air crossings near MSP under low visability conditions." In December 2010, FAA Great Lakes Region officials were invited by SMAAC and Congressman Ellison to discuss the procedural changes and any plans for future further changes. The impetus for the 9 Dec 2010 SMAAC Forum was increasing reports of overflights, particularly from neighborhoods where departing aircraft had not previously flown, coupled with the July 2010 World Health Organization Warning of increased health risks near busy airports. In conversations with regional FAA officials and Mr. Rydeen, SMAAC became aware that "efficiency," not safety, was the primary motivation for the way the changes in runway use were made. We found a reference to "efficiency policy" at faa.gov as a staff recommendation that airport airspace management should support runway use and operations "at minimal separations whenever possible." This was to prepare airports for increased flight operations as en route density increased after Next Gen enroute implementation. Efficient use of runways has a cost-savings ring to it when FAA and airport facilities capital plans are being discussed. But, in practice, such traffic management with the shortest possible intervals between runway operations is very problematical, not only expensive but also risking public health and safety. SMAAC Policy: No air traffic management plan should trump safety or environmental protection merely to reduce schedule delays. Rather, MSP airspace management should be based on safe scheduled arrivals under all conditions and ad hoc arrival acceptances when possible. Reasonable and affordable facilities at MSP are based on economically- needed passenger capacity agreements and a 1:1 local-to-connecting passenger ratio and FEIS decisions; increasing capital investments and modifying operations for "efficiency" clearly requires State approval and a comprehensive environmental impacts investigation. "Capacity" at MSP and other airports is a key provision in specific agreements between the Federal government and the airport manager (sponsor). Only the airlines (and at MSP, connecting passengers) benefit from increases runway use (operations per hour). The small MSP site and asymetrical converging runways make conditions when the theoretical maximum use (100 arrivals and 60 departures) is possible very rare. New technologies may someday provide slight decreases in runway-use intervals, resulting in fewer operational delays. This applies more usefully i f scheduled arrivals per hour are planned for SE flow (two arrival runways) rather than scheduling operations daily assuming NW flow (three arival runways. 56 -- Jim Spensley President, SMAAC 520.229.7657 Cell 57 Heather Branigin From:Amy Cichanowski <amycich@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 9:27 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:support of winter rec at Braemar To Whom it May Concern- We would like to voice our support for the City of Edina to invest in Braemar as a Winter Recreation Area. The Minnesota Youth Ski League (MYSL) is a volunteer organization that offers children between the ages of 4 and 14 and their parents the opportunity to learn, develop and enjoy cross country skiing skills together. The League is a collection of neighborhood clubs, administered by a Board of Directors, offering leader training, festivals, and outreach programs which builds interest in cross country skiing. Programs emphasize fun, fitness and development of a life-long love for outdoor activities, (especially cross country skiing!), as the primary focus of this family organization. The MYSL has over 20 years of experience and currently has over 2000 kids skiing each winter. With snow conditions being a concern, this past winter was the first in our history where we had to cap enrollment due to permit availability. We are very excited about the potential of the Braemer facility, which is ideal in location, amenities and terrain for youth cross-country skiing. An Edina MYSL club could easily become one of our premier clubs with 100-150 participants skiing weekly in the winter and partnering with the Edina High School ski team (to provide junior coaches and a path for kids to continue skiing when they are older). We find that getting young kids out skiing with their families is the best way to instill the importance of outdoor recreation to the next generation. We have low barriers to entry with an inexpensive club membership ($40-$45) and options for equipment rental. We have clubs at most ski trails in the metro (and the state). We have a strong network of support and know how to build successful clubs. Having the Braemer location as a option for a new MYSL Club and as a potential backup site in low snow years is a fabulous amenity for hundreds of young skiing families in our community. Sincerely Amy Cichanowski www.mysl.org -- Amy Cichanowski amycich@gmail.com Executive Director Minnesota Youth Ski League PO Box 18659 Minneapolis MN 55418 www.mysl.org 58 Heather Branigin From:Jill Bruns <usjbru@coloplast.com> Sent:Monday, May 16, 2016 8:29 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Please approved vote to have trails groomed at Braemar I am in agreement with passing the vote to have Braemar add snowmaking and some Nordic trails. 1. It will give the EHS Nordic Ski Team the ability to use the trails and to have a second option for ski practices. 2. The hard work of volunteers at EHS could be taken over by Braemar which would provide a great support to the ski team and to skiers in the community. Jill S. Bruns Quality Systems Coordinator Coloplast Manufacturing US, LLC Mail to: USJBRU@Coloplast.com 612‐302‐4999 Direct Coloplast Manufacturing U.S. 1601 West River Road North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 (612) 588‐4685 http://www.coloplast.com Disclaimer: This Coloplast e‐mail may contain confidential information and is intended only for the addressee. You may not disclose such confidential information. If you have received this e‐mail by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this mail. 59 Heather Branigin From:Gene Kay <genekay@ergoadvocate.com> Sent:Sunday, May 15, 2016 9:33 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Please support the Braemar Park Winter Sports plan Dear council members, I'm writing in support of the Braemar Park revitalization plans that include the addition of snowmaking and winter sports, and I want to encourage you to vote in favor of these plans. I am a Three Rivers Parks Commissioner, a long-time volunteer with the Loppet Foundation and the Wirth Winter Sports venue, and I married into a big Edina family. As you know, Three Rivers Parks has been a leader in this area and we have seen tremendous interest and participation in our winter sports activities including nordic skiing and tubing. Likewise, the Loppet Foundation has seen significant growth in healthy outdoor winter activity as a result of their snow making installation as well. We are seeing people of all ages out there - from the youngest Minnesota Youth League skiers to the most senior Masters skiers in their 80's and 90's. Perhaps the most enthusiastic group of participants is the high school skiers and Edina has one of the largest high school teams in the state. Getting this demographic off their phones and out into the parks is a huge win for all of us. A few years back I spoke with the mom of one of these your skiers skiers and she was commenting on how her son completely changed his lifestyle to include healthy eating and an early bed time as a result of his participation on the high school ski team. Please vote to reconfigure Braemar to become a more inclusive, multi-use, year-round facility. Your community will love it and you will experience a great improvement in the quality of life in Edina. It will also make a nice off-season compliment to the new Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail now under construction! Sincerely, Gene Kay Three Rivers Parks Commissioner -- Gene Kay, MS CPE Certified Professional Ergonomist Director of Ergonomics ErgoAdvocate/VelocityEHS Ergonomics W: 952-960-1917 60 Heather Branigin From:Yonghua Chen <yonghuachen@hotmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 8:58 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Nordic Trail Dear Council Members, Please approve the proposal to add the Braemar Nordic Trail. It would be wonderful for families and athletes to work out and train in our own city trail. Thank you! Chen family, 6028 Erin Terrace 61 Heather Branigin From:ELIZABETH MARTY <jlizmarty@msn.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 4:14 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snowmaking at Braemar Hello, This is one Edina family in favor of snowmaking at Braemar Park to enable cross‐country skiing. We have a daughter at Edina High School on the Nordic ski team, and this plan would help solve many of the issues the team will be facing after the 2016‐17 season. Many of their current options for training will be gone after the 2016‐17 season due to construction and expansion of the Nine Mile creek trail. This will also provide a great opportunity for Edina families, including ours, to get out and enjoy the MN winter! Thank you, Jon & Liz Marty 62 Heather Branigin From:Jen Kompelien <jen@opendynamics.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 4:13 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Supporting snow-making at Braemar Hello~ Just writing in to show strong support for snow-making at Braemar next winter. I’ve just learned that new construction on trails/high school will ruin our EHS Nordic trails which we’ve appreciated so much for the last few years. It’s difficult for us to get assigned more than one or two practice sessions at Hyland per week so I’m not even sure what the kids would do. This growing Nordic program has been an incredibly positive experience for both of my kids and I’d hate to see it ruined. Also, both teams have gotten so strong with another shot at State next year if they can get the training they need. Thanks for your consideration- please vote YES on snow-making at Braemar! Jen Jennifer Kompelien Open Dynamics, Inc. www.opendynamics.com p 952.920.8045 jen@opendynamics.com _________________________ accelerating business growth and development voice of client | strategic planning | team development 63 Heather Branigin From:Kelly Streit <kellymstreit@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 2:23 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Trail at Braemar I am writing in support of adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar. I think this is an important benefit for our community and our HS Cross Country team. A side effect of the wonderful expansion of the high school is the loss of trails for our nordic ski team. It would be great if this could by made up by adding trails to Braemar. I moved to Edina 5 years ago and one of the things I love are the myriad of outdoor activities available all year round. I hope it continues. Please vote in favor of the trails. Thank you! Kelly Streit 5421 Kellogg Ave. 64 Heather Branigin From:Kassandra Kuehl <kassandrakuehl@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 2:16 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Nordic Trails and Snowmaking To Whom It May Concern, My name is Kassandra Kuehl and I am an Edina resident. I currently reside on Gallagher Dr. and my daughter Samantha is a 9th grader at Southview Middle School. I am writing to you today in support of the proposed Nordic skiing trail grooming and snowmaking at Braemar. My daughter is a member of the Edina Nordic Skiing Team and these efforts would help the team immensely. Below my signature on this email, I have outlined some of the very specific ways that these efforts would make a tremendous impact on the team (this outline is taken from a group email discussion between team parents). As this team is the largest team sport at Edina High School (and also boasts a significant number of middle school participants), these efforts would benefit a significant number of Edina families now and into the future. In addition, it is worth pointing out that the diverse opportunities that families have here in Edina are why many of us have flocked to this city and certainly why our particular family has remained here. If it is at all possible to add to these opportunities by making these trail grooming and snowmaking possibilities available, this effort will simply be another reason for Edina families to remain happy, healthy and present in our lovely city. Thank you for your consideration, Kassandra Kuehl The EHS Nordic Team is currently able to make snow and ski several kilometers of trail at EHS. However, this will change significantly after the 2016‐17 season. Nine Mile Creek trail is under construction and this will dramatically affect our ability to hold ski practices at the high school. A bridge will be added crossing highway 62 taking out important hill trails by the water tower. We currently enjoy 5km of trails at the high school, but the regional trail will cross our ski trails many times, and when the trail is plowed, our ski trails won’t be skiable anymore. A new accessibility path will be built from the parking lot of EHS to the lower fields. This will be plowed in the winter, so we will not be able to ski in the area by the tennis courts anymore. Additionally, we will be losing some of our ski space (tennis court area, restored prairie hill, and behind the bunker). It is very difficult to obtain permission to hold practices at Hyland. Currently we can plan on about 1 practice slot per week. 65 For these reasons, it would be nice to see Braemar add snowmaking and some Nordic trails. 66 Heather Branigin From:Lise Crosby <LCrosby@Reviva.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 1:52 PM To:Edina Mail Cc:Slater Crosby Subject:Ski Trails at Braemar Dear City Council Members – We would like to urge you to vote YES regarding adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar for 3 reasons. 1. Adding ski trails at Braemar will only improve winter outdoor fitness options in Edina and give the entire community a place to cross country ski and potentially bring more business to Tin Fish/restaurant during the winter months. 2. Our entire family are Nordic Skiers and our middle daughter, Sophie Crosby has been on the Nordic Team at Edina High School for the past 4 years. It is our understanding that the EHS Trail will be limited in the future due to Nine Mile Creek Trail construction. The EHS Nordic team needs better practice options and trails at Braemar would be the perfect solution, especially since practice time at Hyland Hills is very difficult to obtain. 3. Slater has been involved in snowmaking and trail maintenance for the current EHS Trail and it requires a lengthy time and energy commitment on the part of volunteers. These tireless volunteers are probably more than ready to give up middle of the night snowmaking shifts and turn over the snowmaking and grooming to professionals. Please vote YES to adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely Lise and Slater Crosby 6828 Valley View Rd Edina The content of this e-mail (including any attachments) is strictly confidential and may be commercially sensitive. If you are not, or believe you may not be, the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and destroy any copies. 67 Heather Branigin From:Anne Hinrichs <a.hinrichs@msn.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 1:38 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Please support snowmaking and grooming at Braemar! Dear City Council members, I know you are voting next week about the possibility of adding snowmaking and Nordic trail grooming at Braemar. I hope you will support this initiative. I am one of several Edina Nordic ski coaches and I have two daughters on the team. We have a very large program, 198 skiers were registered this past season (7th – 12th grade boys and girls). Until now we have been able to ski right at EHS. Due to several changes in the Nine Mile Creek trail and the EHS expansion, this opportunity will soon be lessened significantly. We would welcome the opportunity to ski at nearby Braemar! Although Hyland Park Reserve has trails, teams are only given approximately one practice time slot each week. We typically train 5‐6 times each week. In addition to the Edina Nordic team, there are many other Edina residents that would utilize these Braemar ski trails. It would be a great way to get people to see Braemar and Tin Fish as year round destinations! Nordic skiing is definitely gaining in popularity and appeals to a broad spectrum of people. I know it is difficult to know where resources should be allocated. Edina clearly considers our youth as a priority. Keeping our youth active and outside is beneficial to their physical and mental health. Clearly we are doing something right when we have so many students sign up for Nordic. Please support our efforts to have nearly 200 adolescents getting some fresh air on skis after school! Thanks! Anne Hinrichs p.s. This past season was the most successful season we’ve had in about 30 years! Our girls’ team (top 7) went to the State Meet and finished in 9th place. We also had 2 boys qualify for State as individuals. On the other end of the spectrum we taught 97 beginners how to ski this year! It’s a diverse, enormous and successful program! Please support us by giving us a place to practice. Thank you! 68 Heather Branigin From:Zdechlik, Mary J <mary.zdechlik@optum.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 1:38 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Please support adding Nordic ski trails to Braemar! Hello! Please support adding Nordic ski trails to Braemar! We need more winter activity options for all ages in Edina to stay active and fit in the winter months! The ski trails are great at the Edina HS, but those are being reduced for a few reasons, so adding trails to Braemar will get used often! Thank you for your consideration! Thank you, Mary Zdechlik 4425 Judson Lane Edina, MN 55435 This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. 69 Heather Branigin From:Hokemeir-Seim, Kathleen <kathleen.hokemeir-seim@medtronic.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 1:03 PM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar - We support Nordic Ski Trails at Braemar Dear Edina City Council, We are in support of adding Nordic Ski Trails and snowmaking at Braemar. This would be a huge benefit to the Edina Nordic Ski Team. The team is a gem for Edina. It involves 3 schools (both middle schools and the high school) and involves a large number of kids. Our son has had a great experience with the team and it really helps to ease the transition to the high school for kids that start the team in middle school. Please support additional trails at Braemar for the kids. Thank you! Kathleen Kathleen Hokemeir-Seim HR Business Partner | Human Resources Medtronic Neuromodulation 7000 Central Avenue NE, RCE385 | Minneapolis, MN 55432 | USA Office 763.526.6317 | Fax 763.526.6375 kathleen.hokemeir‐seim@medtronic.com medtronic.com | Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube LET’S TAKE HEALTHCARE FURTHER, TOGETHER [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser: http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com 70 Heather Branigin From:Brandt, Andrea (RIS-MIN) <andrea.brandt@lexisnexis.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 11:27 AM To:Edina Mail Cc:Craig Brandt Subject:nordic ski trails at braemar PLEASE consider creating Nordic ski trails at Braemar next winter. We live between Creek Valley and EHS. My son is on the Nordic Ski team and will be impacted by the upcoming construction next year. But, I ski too there with my husband and friends. I would be thrilled to be able to ski at Braemar. It’s a gorgeous piece of property. It would bring business to the Tin Fish/club house in the winter. I did the moonlight‐snow shoe event last year at Braemar and it was a blast. Please consider creating and maintain xx ski trails. Thank you!! Andrea Brandt 6524 Nordic Drive Edina, MN55439 ---------------------------------------- The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. 71 Heather Branigin From:Julie Baron <JBaron@treancorp.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 11:17 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemer Snowmaking Dear Council, I am writing in support of the city’s endeavor to add a snowmaking operation at Braemer Park. This would truly make Braemar a winter recreation destination. Also, with EHS losing its trails due to the new construction and Nine Mile Creek Trail, it will be invaluable to the schools Nordic team which introduces scores of students to this life‐long winter activity. Regards, Julie Baron, CPA (inactive) |CFO | Trean Corporation 100 Lake Street W | Wayzata, MN 55391 952.974.2249 | 952.974.2240 | jbaron@treancorp.com This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, notify the sender immediately by return email and delete the message and any attachments from your system. 72 Heather Branigin From:Clayt Tabor <clayt.tabor@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:51 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Edina Nordic Skiing Trail Options Edina City Council: Next year, we will have two daughters at Valley View Middle School who will both be participating in Nordic Skiing. The Nine Mile Creek Trail will seriously impact the team’s ability to hold practice on the current trails at the high school where parents and volunteers work tirelessly to make snow and groom the trails. Having to leave Edina to scrap for time at other venues, such as Highlands in Bloomington, increases expenses and time commitments for all involved. Edina has a first class Nordic program and the coaches, players, and parents are extremely dedicated. These teams are chock full of impressive student athletes, just the type of kids we all wish others would emulate. We urge you to add additional snowmaking and trail grooming in other areas of Edina, such as Braemar. Respectfully, Clayt & Julie Tabor 6024 Grove Cir Edina, MN 55436 612‐306‐8226 clayt.tabor@gmail.com 73 Heather Branigin From:Neal Blanchett <nealjblanchett@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:50 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar ski trails Dear Mayor, Council members, and staff, I am writing to strongly support ski trails and snowmaking at Braemar. I ski often at Braemar, and I have really enjoyed the skate-skiing trails groomed the last few years; I would love to see more. Braemar has excellent terrain-rolling but not too steep. That makes it a great place to learn for anyone, but also a fun place to go fast for more advanced skiers. It's a great fit for Braemar, adding winter recreation to summer golf to make it a year-round gathering place. Edina is quietly growing a vibrant Nordic skiing community. The EHS Nordic team is consistently one of the largest teams, at or approaching 200 student-athletes. Nordic skiing is one of the best winter cross-training sports-Nordic athletes have also excelled in soccer, track, cross-country, cycling, and more. In addition Nordic skiing is a great family winter outdoor activity. The sport is large in Minnesota and growing-trails at Hyland, Wirth Park, and the Minneapolis lakes are busy with skiers. The Nordic team has maintained 5 kilometers of trail near the high school, but the new Nine-Mile Creek trail cuts off significant chunks of that network, so the team needs new trails desperately. Nordic skiing is a wonderful sport, similar to running, as you can be casual or competitive, it's a lifelong sport, it gets you outdoors in the winter, you can do it on your own or in a group, and it's one of the very best total-body exercises. It is part of an active lifestyle that families look for when choosing where to live. Braemar is a great location for it. I strongly support trails, grooming, and snowmaking at Braemar. Thank you, Neal Blanchett 4737 Hibiscus Avenue Edina 55435 74 Heather Branigin From:Sami Peterson <spspeterson@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:46 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snowmaking at Braemar City Council Vote City Councilman/woman, As an alumni of the Edina Nordic Ski Team (pre-snowmaking era), having a real place to practice is highly beneficial for the team--they're better than they have been in years. Additionally, they will be losing a lot of their facilities over the next few years, which could be bad for the school system's ski program growth. Not only will this snowmaking be beneficial to the team, but could bring additional people and families to Braemar, and be a good recreational activity for residents in the city of Edina. It would be nice to see Braemar add snowmaking and some Nordic Ski trails. Best, Sami Peterson 75 Heather Branigin From:Brian Kemp <bdkactman@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:31 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snow Making Proposal I am an Edina resident in the Cornelia area. I am writing to express support for the proposal to add snowmaking at Braemar. Our daughters have been active in Nordic Skiing at the high school for the last several years, including serving as captains of the team. The combined boys and girls teams at the high school represent one of the largest teams at the school with ~200 or more skiers for the last 4 years. This is an indication of the interest in the community. I also know several adult residents who are ardent Nordic skiers. This proposal would serve both the adults and the youth in the community. It is especially important as the trails at the high school (which are maintained by the coaches and parents of the team but are open to the community) will impacted by construction at the school and the Nine Mile Creek trail. Adding this to Braemar will help ensure continued access to skiing for all members of the community and the continued success of the high school teams. Thank you for supporting this proposal. 76 Heather Branigin From:Cally L. Chermak <CChermak@dermspecpa.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:19 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Hi, Please help our Edina high school Nordic ski and groom trails with snow production at Braemar this winter. My husband and I along with our three children ( including my daughter on the ski team) will also use them. Thanks, Cally Lawler Chermak Notice: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you. 77 Heather Branigin From:Tim Karlen <Tim.Karlen@ceresenv.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:15 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar CC trails I am an Edina resident currently living at 6704 Samuel Road. We have owned three houses all in 55439 since 1996. We strongly support the cross country ski proposal at Braemar. We see the investment being made in research and re‐ construction of the golf experience there and believe the new restaurant facilities would likely benefit from an off‐ season activity centered there. Our children are in the Nordic program at Valley View and EHS and that would be an easily accessible location for kids and skiers of all ages. Thank you, TJK Tim Karlen, SPHR Director of Talent Acquisition & Human Resources Ceres Environmental Services, Inc. http://www.ceresenvironmental.com 3825 85th Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55443 tim.karlen@ceresenv.com 1‐800‐218‐4424 78 Heather Branigin From:Craig Jarvinen <jarvinen@aol.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:13 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:ski trails at Breamar I would like to voice my strong support for the project currently being considered for Braemar Park that includes the creating of new trails and snow making for cross country skiing and tubing. This is a great idea! The trails are needed for the high school ski team – a very big team, 3rd largest sport in Edina, and one of the largest ski teams in the entire country! The team is losing practice space at the high school due to school construction and the 9 mile creek trail. There are no other practice spaces available to the team. Hyland park is available, however, only about one practice slot per week can be obtained. Edina needs more trails – Edina is way behind other communities in the Metro area having so few trails of any sort. I’d like to see the Edina go further and re‐open the outdoor shooting range that once operated near the current indoor range in Breamar Park. Opening this range would allow for biathlon (combine cross country skiing and shooting). Biathlon is an Olympic sport and is extremely popular in Europe as a spectator sport‐crowds of 50,000 are common in Russia and all across Europe. Biathlon is growing in the United States. Shooting sports are growing quickly‐Edina recently added a trap/skeet team. There are no biathlon ranges in the core metro area. Adding biathlon would likely add another 50 skiers to the Edina Nordic team. Biathlon is not included in the winter recreation at Braemar proposal, but could be added in an expansion down the road. Please vote yes for winter recreation at Braemar Park! Thanks, Craig Jarvinen 4351 Parklawn Ave. Unit 6 79 Heather Branigin From:Dave Horan <davehoran03@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:09 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Possible Braemar Nordic Trails I wish to express my strong support for the idea of creating cross country ski trails at Braemar that would include grooming and snow making. As a cross country skier for the past 35+ years, the availability of trails in Edina would be fantastic. Braemar seems ideally suited for this with great terrain, ample parking, buildings for warmth and gathering and Tin Fish. This could be a great addition to our already great parks system!! Thanks for your consideration. Dave Dave Horan 4215 Lynn Ave 952‐334‐0872 Sent from my iPad 80 Heather Branigin From:Erica Austrums <eaustrums@aol.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:07 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:In favor of snowmaking and Cc trails at Braemar. I am favor of snowmaking and cross country nordic trails at Braemar to support our High School Nordic ski team and to encourage fitness in our community. Erica Austrums Edina resident 81 Heather Branigin From:Brian Kompelien <brian@ensembleplan.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 10:02 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:vote Yes for nordic trails and grooming at Braemar, thanks! Greetings: My daughter Emily Kompelien skis with the Nordic team and has done so for the past several years. The team is a huge benefit to her athletically and socially. With the success and growth of the team, I urge you to consider Braemar trails to support the team! Thank you for your work on this. Brian Kompelien Brian Kompelien, ChFC Ensemble Planning, LLC 5001 Chowen Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55410 ...................................... P :: 612.978.1911 F :: 612.313.7560 ..................................... www.ensembleplan.com ..................................... Wealth Manager of and Securities & Investment Advisory services offered through Cetera Advisor Networks LLC, member FINRA/SIPC. Cetera is under separate ownership from any other named entity. I cannot accept any trading instructions sent via email as they may not be executed in a timely manner. Opinions expressed are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. All economic and performance information is historical and not indicative of future results. 82 Heather Branigin From:Darren Ruschy <Darren.Ruschy@aonbenfield.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:59 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snow making at Braemar for cross country skiing Dear City Council Member: Winter recreation in Edina has a long, successful history. From wonderfully maintained outdoor rinks to roads and paths plowed for running, few cities in our climate do it as well. Adding snow making for cross country skiing at Braemar would greatly enhance outdoor activities for my family and others in Edina and surrounding areas. As a cross‐country skier myself, I cherish well‐kept trails. Adding more access to trails in Edina is a huge step forward for me, my family and several other families in Edina. Add to that the use of the trails by the Edina Cross‐Country ski team and you have a win‐win scenario. This is a no brainer. Please vote yes on Tuesday, May 17. Darren Ruschy 5509 Doncaster Way Edina, MN 55436 612-840-6070 83 Heather Branigin From:lijun.zou@usbank.com Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:56 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:New ski trails proposed at Braemar Park with snowmaking Hi City Council, I'm in support of the new ski trails. My daughter tried Edina Nordic Ski Team for the past winter and she loves it. But They could only get very limited practice time at Hyland Ski Park. Based on her feedback, a new ski trail will help them with more practice time greatly. I also have adult friends who like nordic ski. I'm sure they will like this new trail too. Please vote Yes on Tuesday, May 17! Thanks, Lijun Zou U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations --------------------------------------------------------------------- Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 84 Heather Branigin From:Chad Schwinghammer <chad@theschwings.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:55 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snow making / Nordic Skiing at Braemar I'm writing to voice my strong support for the proposal to add snow making and trail grooming equipment at Braemar. I live directly on Nine-Mile Creek and have witnessed first hand the construction of the Great Wall of Edina bike trail and resulting destruction of considerable natural habitat and the taking down of many trees. I have voiced my objection to this trail on many occasions, but I've lost that fight and will learn to live with the freeway running through my back yard. However, when I learned about the adverse impact of the bike trail on the Nordic trails behind EHS, I had to speak up again. The City of Edina at large and Edina High School in particular would benefit from access to groomed nordic ski trails. It would be a great amenity for all residents and would allow the continuation of the great tradition of the EHS Nordic team. Please approve the proposal to add this equipment at Braemar. Thanks, Chad Schwinghammer 5513 Valley Lane 85 Heather Branigin From:Katie Crosby Lehmann <katiecl@live.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:49 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Edina Nordic trails We have three kids in the Edina schools and are very active outdoors. Edina needs to continue to provide outdoor trails to keep and grow the population of families. The Nordic trails at Braemar are an excellent idea. Please vote for them. Thanks. KCL Sent from my iPhone 86 Heather Branigin From:Sara Jones <shjones05@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:48 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:I Support Ski Trails at Braemar Dear City Council Members, I understand that on May 17th you will be voting on whether to create and maintain new Nordic ski trails at Braemar. I encourage you to support this measure, which will enhance our community's recreation options. My family has been involved with the Edina Nordic team for many years (as skiers, captains, coaches, parent volunteers). It's been great to have trails available at the high school and I understand that some of the changes to the Nine Mile Creek trail and changes to the grounds of Edina High School will limit some of those trails. We need ski trails for the Edina Nordic team to practice on because it's very, very difficult to get practice time at Hyland Park. The team serves nearly 200 students from grades 7-12 (it's a no-cut sport, which is great for encouraging participation in healthy winter activity). It provides instruction for brand-new skiers for a lifetime sport and provides an incredibly healthy sport option for all of the students on the team from beginners to the highly-competitive. In addition, the trails would be open to the whole community (as the existing high school trails are), providing a healthy and fun family winter recreation option. This will make use of Braemar in the winter, making it an even better community resource. Please support Nordic ski trails for the winter enjoyment of our community. Sara 87 Heather Branigin From:Zhong.Yi@usbank.com Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:47 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snow Making and Trail Grooming at Braemar Dear City Council Member: I am writing you to support the motion to add snow making and trail grooming at Braemar Park. My family has several members in Edina High School Nordic Ski Club. This will benefit them tremendously. Thank you for your support. George Yi US Bank - Enterprise Due Diligence Systems (EDDS) Phone: 612.973.8377 Email: zxyi@usbank.com U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations --------------------------------------------------------------------- Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 88 Heather Branigin From:Jiang, Mingxiao, Ph.D. <mingxiao.jiang@medtronic.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:46 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar add snowmaking and some Nordic trails Good morning, I would like to support Braemar add snowmaking and some Nordic trails. It benefits Edina school kids and residents. Thank you! Mingxiao [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser: http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com 89 Heather Branigin From:Michael Huttner <huttnermn2@comcast.net> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:37 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Ski trails at Braemar - Yes! We strongly support the plan for the city of Edina to create and maintain ski trails in the winter at Braemar golf course. Please vote yes to make this happen. More ski trails would benefit our schools' students. Our Nordic ski team would have a local practice area and not have to compete for trail time at Hyland Park. All our city residents would have another place to cross-country ski. The Braemar club house would get more business and revenue in the winter. It is a win - win situation. 90 Heather Branigin From:Paul Zdechlik <paulzdechlik@usfamily.net> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:36 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar CC ski trails Hello, I would like to voice my support for new CC ski trails proposed at Braemar. Currently the EHS has a 5k groomed trail that will be broken up significantly due to the upcoming EHS and 9-mile creek trail construction. Not only would this be great for the over 200 Nordic skiers on the EHS team, but more for the community at large. We have used the trails as a family of 5 in the winter and see several other out there as well. We need more affordable ways of exercising in the community, especially in the winter. Wellness only makes this city better!! Please vote yes for these CC ski trails! Paul Zdechlik 91 Heather Branigin From:Ruoqi Chen <rqchen@hotmail.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:30 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Fwd: [Edina Nordic Ski Team] New ski trails proposed at Braemar Park with snowmaking - ACTION NEEDED I vote for the snowmaking proposal Have a Great Day! Ruoqi via iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Coach Anne Hinrichs <donotreply@email.teamsnap.com> Date: May 13, 2016 at 9:19:13 AM CDT To: yonghuachen@hotmail.com, Leonardc20096@isd273.org, rqchen@hotmail.com Subject: [Edina Nordic Ski Team] New ski trails proposed at Braemar Park with snowmaking - ACTION NEEDED Reply-To: Coach Anne Hinrichs <a.hinrichs@msn.com> The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Dear Edina Nordic Families, Action requested: if you are in support of this, please contact your city council representative immediately via email mail@edinamn.gov Be sure to write a sentence or two about why you support this. This is an urgent message regarding an upcoming City Council vote. We are hoping you can indicate your support of this issue by sending an email immediately. The vote is this coming Tuesday, May 17! Please read this email and take action immediately if you are in agreement. The City Council is considering adding snowmaking and trail grooming at 92 Braemar. If the vote passes, this would give us an excellent opportunity to be able to ski some place other than, or in addition to EHS. We are definitely in favor of having more options than we do currently. Today we are able to make snow and ski several kilometers of trail at EHS. This will change significantly after the 2016‐17 season. Nine Mile Creek trail is under construction and this will dramatically affect our ability to hold ski practices at the high school. A bridge will be added crossing highway 62 taking out important hill trails by the water tower. We currently enjoy 5km of trails at the high school, but the regional trail will cross our ski trails many times, and when the trail is plowed, our ski trails won’t be skiable anymore. A new accessibility path will be build from the parking lot of EHS to the lower fields. This will be plowed in the winter, so we will not be able to ski in the area by the tennis courts anymore. Additionally, we will be losing some of our ski space (tennis court area, restored prairie hill, and behind the bunker). We all know that we are currently very lucky to have several key volunteers who do our snowmaking at EHS. This is hard work that could be taken over by the City of Edina at Braemar Park. It is very difficult to obtain permission to hold practices at Hyland. Currently we can plan on about 1 practice slot per week. For these reasons, it would be nice to see Braemar add snowmaking and some Nordic trails. If you are in agreement, please send an email to the following address immediately: mail@edinamn.gov Your email will be sent to all of the City Council members automatically. Explain how this will impact your family and the community ‐ ‐ having more winter recreation opportunities right here in Edina would be great! 93 From Skinnyski.com: (Submitted by Craig Jarvinen) Edina Snowmaking Proposal April 12, 2016 Edina is considering a snowmaking operation at Braemer Park. Early plans call for a [2.2 - 2.25km] snowmaking loop to be completed by December 2017. Review more details below by clicking on these links: - Proposal Background/Timeline - Winter Park at Braemer - Statement of Qualifications Watch for another email soon from us regarding roller ski rental pick up, summer training plans, and Mesabi dates (it’s at the very end of our long winter break this year!). This email is from Coaches Andy Turnbull, Craig Jarvinen and Anne Hinrichs. You may see it again as we are hoping to also send it to our old gmail list. Thanks for taking action immediately! You are receiving this message because you are a member of the Edina Nordic Ski Team. 94 Log In To Your Account If you prefer not to receive email from Team Edina Nordic Ski Team, update your communication preferences. TeamSnap World HQ, 2040 14th Street, 1st Floor, Boulder, CO 80302 95 Heather Branigin From:Johnson, Gary <gjohnson@apog.com> Sent:Friday, May 13, 2016 9:29 AM To:Edina Mail Subject:Snow Making at Braemar Dear City Council, I am an enthusiastic supporter of adding snowmaking and trail grooming at Braemar. MN winters are long and cold and cross country skiing as a fantastic way for Edina residents of all ages to get outside and exercise. In addition, the trail construction at nine mile creek will make skiing at the high school no longer practical. Please support this proposal. Gary Johnson Gary R. Johnson Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | Vice‐President & Treasurer “Distinctive Solutions for Enclosing Commercial Buildings and Framing Art” 4400 West 78th Street, Suite 520, Minneapolis, MN 55435 Tel: 952‐487‐7542 | gjohnson@apog.com www.apog.com The information contained in this e‐mail message and any attachments is proprietary and intended only for the confidential use of the designated recipient named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately at the e‐mail address listed above. Thank you. 96 Heather Branigin From:Kirsten Mrachek <kmrachek@hotmail.com> Sent:Thursday, May 12, 2016 2:39 PM To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1 @gmail.com Cc:John Mrachek Subject:Sidewalks on West Woodland Hi ‐ My name is KIRSTEN MRACHEK and we live at 4520 West Woodland. We moved in Sept 2006 when I was pregnant with our third child. We lived in our 1954 Rambler for 5 yrs, torn down and build our dream home in 2012. We LOVE this neighborhood and have seen it GROW a lot in 10 years. The number of kids has quadrupled and so has car traffic. There are 40+ kids on our 2 blocks. We moved from Mpls which has sidewalks ‐ great for young and old. We constantly "police" the street because of the many distracted drivers on West Woodland heading to Kuhlman Field, The Edina Community Center and Southview. There has been a growing number of bus riders on Wooddale ‐ they are dropped on corner of Wooddale/W Woodland and walk home, to their jobs or events at the locals schools or the Community Center. We also have seen an increase of walkers, runners and bikers in 10 years. This is a safety issue for sure and we need the sidewalks now!!! We are a healthy community and sidewalks promotes health and wellness. Please help us ‐ please realize the West Woodland needs to provide sidewalks to our residents and visitors!!!! Thank you for all you do in Edina!!! ‐KIRSTEN MRACHEK KIRSTEN E. MRACHEK C/612‐867‐0394 H/952‐926‐3640 97 Heather Branigin From:crabtreejr@aol.com Sent:Thursday, May 12, 2016 1:54 PM To:Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:Joyce Repya; Chad Millner; cliddy@millerdunwiddie.com Subject:Wooddale Avenue bridge - EHL Overlay Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of Council At the May 17, 2016 Council meeting, you will be asked to add the Edina Heritage Landmark Overlay to the Wooddale Avenue Bridge. This follows the approval by the Planning Commission at its meeting on April 13, 2016, at which I was present. I would like to see the Wooddale Avenue bridge maintained in something like its present form. However, before the EHL Overlay deignation is added to the bridge, there are several questions which you should ask. These were not addressed in the video or in the presentation by Joyce Repya, Senior Planner, at the Planning Commission meeting, or in the supporting documentation. The questions are: 1. What is the condition and expected life of the bridge footings? 2. What is the condition and expected life of the main structure of the bridge, ie the steel arch and the concrete above it, but especially the steel arch? If the steel arch has a limited life and / or cannot be maintained, then this helps frame the discussion about the stonework which forms the bridge facings and railings, and gives the bridge much of its character and appeal. 3. What will be the appearance of the bridge after a complete preservation / restoration process? There is a picture of the original (1937) appearance in the video about the bridge, showing clean faced stonework. Today it looks very different.. The bridge was built using Platteville limestone, which was locally available, and hes been extensively used in Minnesota. Sadly it is not a good building material. It absorbs moisture and spalls. (ie breaks into small pieces, and in the case of the Platteville limestone often flakes). The deteriorating limestone has given the bridge its current textured appearance which is attractive to many people. The early parts of St. Stephen's Church were built using Platteville limestone., but the 1967 addition was built using Indiana limestone. The Plattevilla limestone wall, which ran along part of the Church's property line on Wooddale Avenue and had by the 1990's fallen into a state of disrepair, no longer exists. I spoke to Chuck Liddy, Principal at Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, who has much historical preservation experience including work at St. Stephen's Church. He told that it is a common practice to replace Platteville limestone with other limestones which are similar in color and striations. (see the email from Chuck Liddy below) However they are far more durable and fit for purpose, and will not deteriorate in the same way. Replacing the stone would restore the original Rustic Style popularized by the WPA. This leads to the next question: 4. Does the community at large understand that the appearance will change? There needs to be a consensus before the city commits itself to the EHL Overlay designation. 5. What are potential costs? This depends upon what work needs to be done and when. However there should be a budget cost for the complete replacement of all the stonework ie re-skinning the bridge, and rebuilding of the western rail extensions. This would be a good point of reference, in today's construction costs. Phasing the preservation / restoration process will ultimately cost more, although some of the work may not be necessary for many years. 98 Grant monies, if they have Federal or State of Minnesota components, require review processes (see email from Chuck Liddy below), and potentially require other work. 6. What needs to happen soon? The railings on the traffic faces of the bridge are in poorer condition, probably due to the salt spray (see email from Chuck Liddy below). The capstones have spalled (flaked) extensively. The top the courses of stone on the river faces would appear to have deteriorated more than the reminder of the stone. I would like to see the Wooddale Avenue bridge preserved / restored as a limestone bridge. However the questions above should be asked and answers considered before the Council grants the EHL Overlay designation.. Sincerely John Crabtree 5408 Oaklawn Avenue, Edina, MN55424-1609 tel: 952-928-8434 cc: Joyce Repya, Senior Planner, City of Edina Chad Millner, Director of Engineering, City of Edina Chuck liddy, Miller Dunwiddie Architecture -----Original Message----- From: Charles D. Liddy <cliddy@millerdunwiddie.com> To: crabtreejr <crabtreejr@aol.com> Sent: Wed, May 11, 2016 2:37 pm Subject: RE: Wooddale Avenue bridge, Edina - telephone conversation follow-up John, yes, you have interpreted our conversation correctly. I have made a few minor edits contained in the text below. Cheers! Chuck Chuck Liddy, FAIA Principal miller dunwiddie architecture 612-278-7777 Please consider the environment before printing this email. From: crabtreejr@aol.com [mailto:crabtreejr@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 8:29 AM To: Charles D. Liddy Subject: Wooddale Avenue bridge, Edina - telephone conversation follow-up Hello Chuck Thank you for taking the time to talk to me on April 28, 2016 re. the Wooddale Avenue bridge in Edina, adjacent to St. Stephen's church. I apologize for taking so long to confirm our conversation - I was away last week. The topics, which we discussed, included: 1. The condition of the existing bridge. You asked if the decay of the Plattville limestone on the railings was worse on the traffic sides, which it is. You then indicated that this would be due to salt mist from winter road treatment. 99 2. You asked if Wooddale Avenue were a County road. I believe that it is not. 3. The replacement of Platteville limestone with other limestone of similar color and striations is often done during restoration processes. You gave as an example some of your work at Fort Snelling, where you were allowed to replace Platteville limestone with another limestone, which was cut to appear like the original. 4. If any preservation funds come from the Federal Govt., there will need to be Section 106 review process {I presume that this refers to National Historic Preservation Act] If any money comes from the State of Minnesota, there will need to be a 138 review process [I presume that this refers to Chapter 138 of the Minnesota Statutes] If there are no adverse findings, then a project will be allowed to proceed as proposed. Otherwise there may need to be mitigation. This could be done in many ways. A plaque with the history of the bridge is one example. Later in the conversation you mentioned the Edina Mill bridge, where the site of the Edina Mill was to be maintained and interpreted. 5. You mentioned that guard heights at the sides of the bridge now have to be 42", and not 36" as was the case when it was built. There are historically appropriate ways to increase guard heights on existing structures. Please confirm that I have understood you correctly. Thank you and best wishes John Crabtree 5408 Oaklawn Avenue, Edina, MN55424-1609 tel: 952-928-8434 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE May 3, 2016 Dear City Administrator: It has come to our attention that some cities are again selling trees and/or shrubs to the public. This responsible and proactive practice has a long history and has improved many urban areas. Many of these cities have valid 2016 nursery stock dealer certificates that allow them to legally conduct these sales. This letter is a reminder that a person (which includes businesses and municipalities) cannot offer for sale, sell or distribute trees, shrubs or perennial plants without first obtaining a 2016 nursery stock certificate. • If your city buys the plants it sells (the usual case), you need to obtain a nursery stock dealer certificate. • If your city operates a growing range and offers to sell or conduct plant sales to the public you might require a nursery stock grower certificate. It is not legal for you to sell nursery stock until you have in your possession a valid 2016 nursery certificate. Per statute the certificate, or copy, must be visible at the sales location for your customers to see. If a nursery inspector finds your city selling nursery stock without a certificate, a Stop Sales Order will be issued and there is an immediate penalty due equal to the fee owed ($150 in the case of an uncertified dealer). A good reason to get an application in quickly if you anticipate any nursery stock sales in 2016. You may apply for a 2016 nursery certificate online via our website www.mda.state.mn.us. Simply double click on the "APPLY/RENEW A LICENSE" box, select "I need to apply for a NEW license" and scroll down the drop down menu to Nursery Stock Dealer or Nursery Stock Grower Certificate. The cost for a new dealer certificate is $150. The fee for a nursery stock grower certificate is based on the size of your nursery stock production site. There is a small surcharge assessed by the financial institution that handles the transactions. You may also apply for a nursery certificate by scrolling down to the bottom of the "I need to apply for a NEW license" box and click on "Forms & Applications web page." Scroll down to Nursery/Greenhouse/Plant and print a hard copy of a Nursery Certificate Application which will allow you to manually complete the form and mail it in with your payment. If you have any questions about these requirements, the application process or other issues involving the sale of nursery stock do not hesitate to contact me at mark.schreiber@state.mn.us or Steven Shimek, Nursery Inspection Program Coordinator at steven.shimek@state.mn.us or telephone Lorraine Englund, Office Administrative Assistant at 651-201-6507. Thank you for your timely cooperation in this matter. Mark Schreibery,5 pervisor Nursery Inspection & Export Certification Unit Plant Protection Division Cc. Geir Friisoe, MDA Steven Shimek, MDA 625 Robert St. N., St. Paul, MN 55155-2538 • 651-201-6000 br 1-800-967-2474 www.mdastate.mmus In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this information is available in alternative forms of communication upon request by calling 651/201-6000. TTY users can call the Minnesota Relay Service at 711 or 1-800-627-3529. The MDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider. Mayor Hovland, members of the City Council, and members of the Planning Commission, Certain qualities made our neighborhoods, communities and the city of Edina a great place to live. Some of these qualities are tangible - good schools, parks, and city services. Edina has the best snow plowing of anywhere with snow that I have lived. (It also has the worst water of anywhere I have lived). Equally important are the intangible qualities in a neighborhood - visually pleasant, peace and quiet, nice neighbors. But the horse is out of the barn, the train has left the station, the damage is done. I am referring to both the residential and commercial overdevelopment in Edina. In 1961 when I was twelve my family moved to east Edina from Minneapolis. We were the fourth house up the hill from York Park and Minnehaha Creek. It was a fun and safe neighborhood. A great place to grow up. In 2008, when my mother turned ninety I moved back in with her to keep her in her home. What a disappointment. Actually more like a nightmare. The two homes across the street were torn down and two HUGE McMansions built. I am sure by now you are familiar with all the complaints. The noise, nonstop shaking, no where for guests to park, the rude construction workers, illegal blocking of streets and driveways with no warning. The new houses are too big for the lots. Loss of sunlight and privacy. Dirt was brought in to raise the height of the lots. There is an incredible amount of runoff when it rains. Almost all the trees on the lots of the new homes die within five years and sometimes the neighbors trees as well. Our east Edina neighborhood has become "Teardown Towne" (the "e" is on towne because this is after all Edina). It was especially sad that my mother at her advanced age and after all those years of paying taxes could not even take a nap or enjoy her porch. Both my parents were architects and I grew up hitting my younger brother over the head with blueprints. I am not opposed to new construction. What I am unhappy about is the lack of concern by the City of Edina for it's long term residents. While the city cannot legislate taste, you should have had stricter ordinances concerning teardowns. Too little too late. I know I am not the only resident who feels this way. Now this neighborhood is no longer visually pleasant. It just looks peculiar. The City Council and Planning Commission keep talking about affordable housing. All the affordable housing in our neighborhood is being torn down and the cheapest homes being built start at seven hundred thousand dollars and now go up to 2.6 million dollars. If Edina wants to attract young families with children to go to the Edina schools where is the affordable housing? It's certainly not being built in the Southdale parking lots either. I also feel you are overdeveloping in the Southdale area. The traffic, especially on Saturdays, on Xerxes Avenue heading south is often backed up from 58th Street all the way to Southdale. When the traffic is bad I find myself going north and then east to grocery shop at Kowa!skis in Minneapolis. Many times I have gone to the Galleria to shop and cannot find a place to park so I leave and shop elsewhere (not in Edina). My mother died in April 2015 and I have now sold her house to a young family who live a half a block away. They have out grown their house and wanted to stay in the neighborhood. They could not afford to stay in Edina and buy a McMansion. They love my mother's house and don't want to tear it down. I could probably afford to buy a townhouse or condo in Edina but I don't think I want to. I feel the city is heading in the wrong direction and no longer reflects my values. I am not naive. I know it takes money to pay for good city services but some things you just can't put a price on. Another refugee from "Teardown Towne", April 2016 Lois Meisch May 10, 2016 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 50th St W Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: The Metropolitan Council has prepared preliminary population and household estimates for your community as of April 1, 2015. This is an annual process governed by Minnesota Statutes 473.24. Please note that these estimates are different from the Council's local forecasts that your community has reviewed before. Forecasts look ahead to the coming decades; the annual estimates communicated below look back in time to the previous year. 2015 Annual Population Estimate The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City of Edina had 50,766 people and 21,831 households as of April 1, 2015. Household size averaged 2.316 persons per household. How was this estimate calculated? We estimate households and population with a housing-stock-based method, which involves three questions: 1. How many housing units did your community have? 2. How many households occupied these housing units? 3. How many people lived in these occupied housing units? This letter includes an overview of our estimation method along with a report showing the data inputs and calculations used to develop the preliminary estimates. For more information, visit http://www.metrocouncil.org/populationestimates , or contact me at 651-602-1513. This estimate is only 10 people higher than my community's 2014 estimate. Does this mean that my community added only 10 people between 2014 and 2015? No, not necessarily. Each year, we update our data and refine our methods, so estimates from different years are not directly comparable. Instead, we recommend examining growth since the 2010 Census. How can my community provide feedback on this estimate? We welcome discussion of the 2015 preliminary estimates and invite you to review and comment on them. Please send any written comments or questions to Matt Schroeder, Metropolitan Council Research, 390 Robert Street North, Saint Paul, MN 55101; or by e-mail to Matt.Schroeder@metc.state.mn.us. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, we must receive your comments, questions, or specific objections, in writing, by Friday, June 24, 2016. What happens after my community provides feedback? The Council will certify final estimates by July 15, 2016 for state government use in allocating local government aid and street aid. Sincerely, Matt Schroeder Senior Researcher 390 Robert Street North I Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P. 651.602.1000 I M. 651.291.0904 I metrocouncil.org An Equal Opportunity Employer METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 2015 Annual Population Estimates Edina city, Hennepin County, Minnesota Households: 21,831 Population in Households: 50,563 Average Household Size: 2.316 Housing Total: 23,090 Population in Group Quarters: 203 Occupancy Rate: 94.55% Total Population: 50,766 The Metropolitan Council's Annual Estimates account for housing stock changes since April 1, 2010. These include housing units permitted and other changes. Other changes are due to demolitions, building conversions (units added or lost), city boundary changes (units annexed in or out), and other changes reported by city and township staff. We assume that 95% of single-family detached units, 90% of townhome/duplex/triplex/quadplex units, and 85% of multifamily units permitted in 2014 were completed and occupiable by April 1, 2015; the remainder are occupiable in the future and will count toward next year's estimates (for April 1,2016). Manufactured homes are counted each year from Metropolitan Council surveys of manufactured home park operators and local governments. Other housing (boats, RVs, etc. used as housing) comes from the most recent American Community Survey estimates. Housing Stock Permitted and Other changes Housing Stock April 1, 2010 built since 2010 since 2010 April 1, 2015 Single-family-detached: 12,861 442 -455 12,848 Townhomes: 1,326 0 0 1,326 Duplex, 3-, 4-plex units: 514 4 -1 517 Multifamily units: 7,859 540 0 8,399 Manufactured homes: 0 0 Other (boats, RVs, etc. as shelter): 0 0 Housing Total: 22,560 23,090 Each housing type has a specifically estimated occupancy rate and average household size. These data come from the most recent Community Survey estimates, decennial census data from the U.S. Census Bureau, and the U.S. Postal Service (for occupancy rates only). For more detail, please see the full methodology, available online from http://www.metrocouncil.org/populationestimates . Definitions: A household is a group of people (or one person alone) occupying a housing unit. The number of occupied housing units and the number of households are equivalent. Population in Group Quarters (or institutional housing) is counted separately through an annual Metropolitan Council survey. Housing Stock Occupancy Occupied with Persons Per Population in April 1, 2015 Rate 2015 Households Household 2015 Single-family-detached: 12,848 95.67% 12,292 2.776 34,128 Townhomes: 1,326 97.02% 1,286 2.776 3,570 Duplex, 3-, 4-plex units: 517 90.91% 470 1.576 741 Multifamily units: 8,349 92.67% 7,783 1.558 12,124 Manufactured homes: 0 95.90% 0 2.553 0 Other: 0 Counted only if occupied 0 2.364 0 Housing Total: 23,090 Households: 21,831 In Households: 50,563 In Group Qtrs: 203 Total Population: 50,766 Metropolitan Council 5/6/2016 Changes to housing stock since 2010 (Metropolitan Council surveys) We start with the housing units from the 2010 Census, then we add units identified in our annual surveys of residential construction (building permits and other housing stock changes) and manufactured housing parks. This results in the estimated number of housing units in each community, broken down by the type of housing. The Metropolitan Council's housing-stock-based approach to estimating population involves answering three questions. HOW MANY HOW MANY HOW MANY PEOPLE HOUSING UNITS HOUSEHOLDS LIVE IN THESE ARE IN THE OCCUPY THESE OCCUPIED HOUSING COMMUNITY? HOUSING UNITS? UNITS? Housing units in 2010 (U.S. Census) Occupancy rates (U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Postal Service) Not all of these housing units are occupied; some are vacant. To estimate the number of households, we examine occupancy rates in the community for different types of housing. These data come from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey and Decennial Census as well as the U.S. Postal Service. This results in the estimated number of households in each community, again broken down by the type of housing. C Average household sizes '..* (persons per household) (U.S. Census Bureau) Finally, we examine the average household sizes in the community for different types of housing. These data come from the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey and Decennial Census. To arrive at the total population, we add in residents of "group quarters" (places like emergency housing shelters and nursing homes), measured by our annual survey of such facilities. The data inputs for your community are on the back of this page. For more detail, see the estimates methodology, available from httpl/www.metrocounciLorglpopulationestimates. May 11,2016 City of Edina RE: Sidewalk on Woodland Rd W. Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing to ask you to approve adding the sidewalk project on Woodland Rd West back into the scope of this summer's roadway construction project. Realizing that it is pretty late in the game, I want you to know there has been much confusion about the sidewalk project among residents on Woodland Rd West. Please give strong consideration to approving sidewalks on Woodland Rd West for the following reasons: 1. The City recommended Woodland Rd W for sidewalks for a valid reason. Quantitative data shows that Woodland receives the highest foot traffic of any street in the neighborhood. 2. The interest survey does not reflect the intentions of the majority of residents - the sidewalk question was asked without giving any context related to street width, placement & lot implications. 3. We want sidewalks! - 88% of Woodland Rd W residents want a sidewalk — as documented on the recent petition submitted to the city. 4. 40+ kids live on Woodland Rd West between Wooddale Dr and Concord Ave. These are YOUNG kids who need sidewalks for SAFETY. Having that many young children in a concentrated area with no sidewalks poses a safety risk. Kids have to walk, bike, scooter in the street to get anywhere. 5. Woodland Road West kids do NOT qualify for the bus for the neighborhood schools (Concord and Southview) due to proximity. As a result, kids are walking to school (in the streets) every day. Sidewalks are needed to ensure their safety. 6. Woodland Rd West is a "Main Vein"- many kids from outside our neighborhood use our street to get to and from school. Sidewalks would also benefit people from adjacent neighborhoods who utilize our street as a passageway to and from school, football games, activities at the athletic fields, etc. 7. Woodland Rd W is a major cut through street for vehicles. That coupled with the high concentration of young children increases the safety risk. Cars are zipping down our street cutting through to get to Highway 100, one of the 4 nearby schools, West Edina or Downtown Edina. We are a cut through with lots of children in the streets. Not Safe. I have personally witnessed several close calls on our street involving vehicles and young children. At it's core, the sidewalk debate is really about SAFETY. Safety for the children, adults, and drivers on Woodland Rd W. Sidewalks will benefit both pedestrians and drivers. I appreciate your service as Mayor and the role you play in shaping our city. I know it is inconvenient to add the sidewalks back in at this point, but at the end of the day, it is the right thing to do. The city recommends it, residents want it, and there are benefits to doing it during the roadway construction project. I urge you to please do what's right versus what is easy. Thank you in advance for your careful consideration and responsiveness on this issue. Sincerely, ?fad Mercado 46e9 Woodland Rd W, Edina, MN 555424 612-396-7661 tracimercado@yahoo.com , k.Af:C rrYt 71A- 1,31-24 krtn..,1444-1 e-7711) Nafeld S 0 - - -(12-r-rn LC he: vyri c) L.(50 CIAT S\rtalYte 4_4) po LAT Ok)-teD tki'dn ccirt ScA Cam rry.A.A.A-e.A, C 11 oadED CACI IAZ1C(it ‘.1.10DA o VCiY) Ca.. nOt heL \ C et,L.-LsAL, LLvm k) vk_ r e, acts 91-fk. G.Pect,k:tr, k.o-Ltjz ay ne, frvrau_ Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen Item Activity: Subject:Receive Petition Requesting Sidewalk On West Woodland Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion accepting petition and referring it to Engineering for processing. INTRODUCTION: On May 2 2016, Jackie Olson submitted a petition requesting sidewalk on West Woodland Road between Concord Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. The normal process is for the Council to formally receive the petition and refer it to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. ATTACHMENTS: Description West Woodland Road Sidewalk Petition City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY CO CIL SIDEWALK E ALLEY PAVING 0 STORM SEWER 0 SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ri PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: WATER MAIN STREET LIGHTING OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between COre Vtd— AV- and WooALJe Ave. ADDRESS between and ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between ADDRESS between ADDRESS and and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) 4,54;e- 1 (-767- Lkoa-0 \A, 0 oc( I Paikf Node , Vaireckeu A A a ra 01/(6(i C vi sAaL441 +VA WIRAILVICUU va,(2k buf‘iin tA-4 I\ 5/Do i(+/t- Po)--€) hVq-raYf )o,RN p-At n AYAAI /01 eetil) PHOfE (4(7d-0 Nood(e---i4 " There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 ' fir 1 AI Ne. , _41111,WIRIA MAT I IIKVAWMIR 'his petition was circulated by: v1/4, c/L, 7 NAME ADDRESS ,r• PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) ‹.7t- R_VSe -jjJ STI,L) j,,A/46/ A,eol ‹cs-ey,,e j'e*A-e,ov- oajZZA..1 147- bR,0t7s 41424 A.-‘4-3717/zz_zia( flrdiL (;) IN) LL A7/1/ 5 _c/9yer7 TerorY)e, 112aci5e rk treA'(`-‘) , M 'ef M CNLS f CA TY Met, alct ?EL. Mir ACCE-CSL /?//J/ (9 PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 6(ko voe.e 4koz..1 wo.m.4 4w3 pp (,NJ /Ads— doect/Als 54/7 I/4061 AV Re> 4(,,attra4die/& Ltsol -52 wodimyA Vek „ist‘A-v9 J3mxii,24,-.0 /26 51, Lc 6, \Whoci act.le kJ/ , /AJ J-j c344eiel L x>d__ kW114/Wecc1)alic1 Rd f3/1.,Z ( oat e rei Ax 502_ 3 C6 ovcl Avti \1n1 AlnIVOLAIO` 14/ P0-4-)N ex-V This petition was circulated by: Nook,/ ADDRESS PHONE e NAME The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 5€ April 27, 2016 City of Edina, City Council City of Edina, Mayor James Hovland 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: Golf Terrace Heights Road Improvements. Dear Council Members: Thank you for your commitment to providing a safe and livable city for our residents! While sometimes a thankless job, your efforts do not go unnoticed! With 88% neighborhood support, the residents of West Woodland Road are respectfully requesting Edina City Council to consider sidewalk installation on West Woodland Road as part of the current road improvement project. Thus moving it from a future project to a current project. We understand the timing of this petition is less than ideal with regards to the staff time, PACS funding priority decisions and project management, but with the overwhelming support for sidewalks on the street we felt it appropriate to submit this petition for consideration now. As you may recall —the staff study conducted last fall showed West Woodland had the highest pedestrian counts and fairly equal cars. That combined with a dangerous 3 street intersection near Southview should put us as a priority sidewalk. Our hope is that since the street was planned with future sidewalks in mind, that the impact on staff time to rework, construction timelines and PACS funding will have less impact than other late sidewalk requests. Perhaps consideration could be given to installing sidewalks (if approved) with Phase 2 late summer if easier. Key Points: 88% of the residents West Woodland or yards on Woodland are in favor of immediate sidewalks and signed the petition. Of this percentage, 83% are residents on the impacted south side of the street. 3 out of 24 did not sign: 1 resident is neutral and is more concerned with drainage than anything else and 2 families were opposed. The home at 4629 W Woodland, which is most affected by this petition, has signed in agreement that they would prefer them soon. As you may recall —the staff study conducted last fall showed West Woodland had the highest pedestrian counts and fairly equal cars. That combined with a dangerous 3 street intersection near Southview should put us as a priority sidewalk. W Woodland offered the fewest barriers thus the least expensive construction costs. 56th appeared to be chosen to "spread out" sidewalk from 58ththus providing the most coverage. At the April 19th meeting, constructions of sidewalks on Tower Street were also approved apparently partially due to the benefits completing it with the active construction project. We would request the same. A sidewalk could be installed without ANY impact to any trees (if a smaller boulevard is considered on the parcel on the corner of W Woodland/Wooddale). This aligns with the Living Streets initiative not only in terms of walk ability, but preserving our green space. Students attending Concord or Southview do not have busing. With West Woodland tying into Woodland Rd —volume of traffic, distracted driving is a growing and urgent concern especially at peak traffic times. Most yards on the north side are "losing" about 4 feet of lawn for future sidewalks. While it may appear our residents were lukewarm on sidewalks based the survey last December, here are more recent comments: "I didn't know I had to fill out the actual survey, I sent a letter supporting sidewalks", Stattine, 4601W Woodland Rd "I don't want to go through construction again, we need to just get it done now" "If I knew the sidewalk wouldn't come out of my whole lawn and the street were moving north I would have been more vocal about supporting them" "I'd rather have sidewalks installed now rather than in the future. If done later, we will have 3 shades of cement from 3 different installations" Tammy Eastland (corner of W Woodland and Concord) "With the number of kids that use our street as their route to school in the morning, and two separate school start times during a busy neighborhood traffic time, I worry about the kids' safety. I am especially concerned about the safety of the kids from traffic driving east toward Wooddale in the mornings, because the glare from the sun can be blinding (especially during the fall)" —Janna Keiffer and Rick Dow, 4621 W Woodland Rd "I thought we were getting sidewalks? When did it change to 56th Street?" "Eminent Domain doesn't seem appropriate unless the project is implemented " - Geoff Olson, 4620 W Woodland Rd Thank you again for your consideration! The Residents of Woodland Rd W Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Heritage Preservation Board, April 12, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: The April 12, 2016 Heritage Preservation Board Minutes are provided for your information. ATTACHMENTS: Description Heritage Preservation Board Minutes, April 12, 2016 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/10/2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall - Community Room 4801 West 50th Street Tuesday, April 12, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Birdman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chairman Birdman, Vice Chair Weber, and Members Christiaansen, Sussman, Moore, McLellan, Kelly, Nymo, and Student Members Puerzer and Otness. Absent was Member Pearson. Staff Liaison, Senior Planner Joyce Repya, and Heritage Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel were also in attendance. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Kelly and seconded by McLellan to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes - March 8, 2016 Motion was made by Sussman and seconded by Christiaansen to approve of the minutes from the March 8, 2016 meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment - None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Certificate of Appropriateness: Process for Evaluating Projects Planner Repya provided the board with a written explanation of how the Planning Department staff interprets the Country Club District’s plan of treatment relative to when a Certificate of Appropriateness is required. The board members expressed that staff’s explanation is consistent with the language in the plan of treatment; however they also understood how there could be confusion from the neighborhood regarding terminology. Dan Dulas, 4609 Bruce Avenue, addressed the board reiterating his concerns regarding staff’s interpretation of the plan of treatment that he expressed at the March meeting. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/10/2016 Expressing a desire to ensure clarity in the plan of treatment, the board agreed to suggest to the City Council that the HPB’s 2017 work plan include an initiative to evaluate of the language in the Country Club District’s plan of treatment. No formal action was taken. B. Edina Heritage Award Nominations The following nominations were received for the 2016 Heritage Award: • The Vayda Residence, 5201 Wooddale Avenue. Nominated by Rehkamp Larson Architects recognizing an addition to the home that embraced the original architecture of the 1935 Tudor style home. • Braemar Arena, 7501 Ikola Way. Nominated by HPB member Bob Moore recognizing the 50th Anniversary of a City facility that has been and continues to be a popular destination for Edina residents. Upon a vote, the Vayda Residence received eight votes; the Braemar Arena received one vote; and there was one abstention - thus, the recipient of the 2016 Heritage Award will be the Vayda Residence, 5201 Wooddale Avenue. The award presentation will take place at one of the City Council meetings in May, depending on the availability of the recipients. C. 2016 Preservation Month Proclamation Planner Repya provided a 2016 Preservation Month Proclamation for the boards’ information; pointing out that annually the Proclamation is adopted by the City Council at their first meeting in May. The text of the Proclamation is the same each year, with the exception of the theme, which for 2016 is “Celebrate the Past as we Plan for the Future”. The board agreed that the theme provides a good representation of the goals and accomplishments of the HPB. No formal action was taken. D. Committee Reports • Educational Opportunities The board reviewed the goals/mission of the committee. While many of the goals have been accomplished, the committee expressed interest in organizing an activity to showcase Edina’s heritage. • Explore the History of Your Home The goals /mission of the committee were reviewed. The concept of partnering with the Edina Historical Society to assist homeowners in exploring the history of their homes was mentioned since the Historical Society has been a natural stop off point for that type of research project. An online home history survey was also discussed since Edina has over the years had an excellent response rate when survey opportunities are provided. E. Historic Map on the City’s Web Site Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/10/2016 Planner Repya provided the board with a demonstration of how one accesses Edina’s historic map on the City’s web site. She explained that the new map will provide links to portions of the HPB’s web pages where detailed information on the historic properties is provided. She added that currently the map is not available on the city’s mobile app, however the City’s Communications Department is checking into that possibility. VII. Correspondence - Preservation Articles of Interest A. About Town - Spring 2016: Call for 2016 Heritage Award Nominations B. About Town - Spring 2016: Oskam House, 6901 Dakota Trail, Designated an Edina Heritage Landmark C. Edition Edina - March 2016: Wooddale Bridge Added to the National Register VIII. Chair And Member Comments • Kelly announced the 2nd annual Country Club District Tour sponsored by the neighborhood on Saturday, May 7th, 10:00 a.m. The congregation point is in Wooddale Park; registration is online, and there is a $10 fee. The proceeds from the tour will go toward funding the neighborhood signage project. • Moore, following up on Kelly’s announcement, explained that at the Historical Society, the original blueprint plans for the home at 4513 Wooddale Avenue were found; adding that perhaps the tour organizers would be interested in displaying the plans at the congregation point prior to the tour. IX. Staff Comments • Schedule for Wooddale Bridge Proposed Designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark: Planning Commission - April 13th Meeting City Council (Public Hearing) - May 17th Meeting • Summer Tour 2016 - Consider the tour designed by Student Member Peter Otness of the West side of the Country Club District. The last HPB Country Club District Tour was in 2007. Will add to the May agenda for a final decision. X. Adjournment - 8:50 p.m. Respectfully Submitted Joyce Repya Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/10/2016 Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Park Board, April 12, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Park Board, April 12, 2016 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/10/2016 1 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Park Board Braemar Golf Course April 12, 2016 I. Call To Order Chair McCormick called the April 12, 2016 Park Board meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call for the Park Board were Chair McCormick, Members Dahlien, Gieseke, Good, Greene, McAwley, Meyer, Miller, Nelson, Strother and Student Members Crist and Lohani. Answering roll call for the Arts & Culture Commission were Chair Miller, Members Chaffee, Ellis, Gunness, LaValleur, Meifert and Suckow. Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Support Specialist Janet Canton and Edina Art Center General Manager Michael Frey III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Good to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Gieseke. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Strother to approve the March 8, 2016 minutes. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Grandview Facility Site Fit Victor Pechaty, from HGA, gave a power point presentation of the two options for the Grandview Facility Site. The Park Board and Arts & Culture Commission gave their feedback and asked questions regarding the two options. Mr. Pechaty indicated that he will take the feedback of what is and is not working for his final report. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/10/2016 2 He stated the purpose of this meeting is to provide several data points from a potential design to go to the City Council. He indicated the final report will be a document that will provide data that will be useful in the future process to make decisions. B. Proposed Cross Country Ski Trails at Braemar Park Staff Liaison Kattreh gave a power point presentation on a proposal for cross country ski trails and snow tubing at Braemar Park. She is proposing they further study the feasibility of adding winter recreation activities at Braemar Park. Park Board members asked questions, voiced concerns and had a discussion about the proposal. Member Greene left at 9:05 p.m. C. 2016 Work Plan Update Chair McCormick gave an update on Initiative 8 (Pollinator Garden) of the Work Plan. She indicated she met with former Member Jones and they added some programming around pollinators. She noted it will be part of the Pamela Park Playground Program as well as part of the Three Rivers programming. The Park Board discussed the Work Plan and the new Park Board members indicated what initiatives they are interested in working with. The following lists the nine initiatives and which members will be working with those initiatives. Initiative 1 (Inclusive Playground – Rosland Park): Members Nelson and McAwley Initiative 2 (Fred Richards Park Master Plan): Members Greene, Good, McAwley, Dahlien and Miller Initiative 3 (Park Signage Replacement Plan and Begin Implementation): Members Nelson, Strother, McCormick, Gieseke and Miller Initiative 4 (Grandview Facility Planning): Member Nelson Initiative 5 (Analysis of Current Programs and Cost Recovery Expectations for City Recreational Programs): Members Good, Lohani, Miller and Dahlien Initiative 6 (Recreation Programming and Facilities Marketing and Communication Delivery Review): Members Strother, McCormick and Crist Initiative 7 (Engage External Resources to Provide Environmental Programming): Members Strother and Gieseke Initiative 8 (Pollinator Garden – Park Property or Partnership with Edina Public Schools): Member McCormick Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/10/2016 3 Initiative 9 (Multi-year Playground Renovation Plan): Members Strother, McAwley, Dahlien and Miller Member Nelson left at 9:32 p.m. VII. Correspondence and Petitions None VIII. Chair and Member Comments Member Gieseke congratulated Member Good on being the new Vice Chair of the Park Board; Member Good was not at the Park Board meeting where it was made official. Member Miller gave thanks and appreciation to the city employees for doing such a great job. IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh gave the following updates: • The Parks & Recreation Department is in major hiring mode. • Staff and consultants are working on the final designs and permitting process for the golf course renovation. • Staff and consultants are going to be kicking off renovations to the exterior of Braemar Clubhouse and the driving range building. • Tin Fish will be taking over the on-course beverage sales; that was part of their original lease agreement. • Staff and consultants will be proposing to have a lawn games area in the back area of the Braemar Clubhouse with the deck overlooking the area as part of the golf course renovation. • The driving range will open on April 15; hitting off the mats only. • The Golf Dome will close on April 14. • Braemar Arena will be hosting the Robertson Cup May 11-15. This is the championship tournament for the North American Hockey League. • Parks & Recreation Assistant Director, Susan Faus, has been working on requests for proposals for playground equipment at Weber and Rosland Parks. • Staff hopes to start working on the Fred Richards site Master Plan process in June. • Nine Mile Creek updated their 100 year flood map which shows most of the entire Fred Richards Golf Course having potential to be underwater. • The Pickleball Court construction at Rosland Park is scheduled to start in early May; there will be a groundbreaking but no date has been set. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/10/2016 4 • The city is still waiting for the final purchase agreement language from the City of Minneapolis for Weber Woods. It should be done and go before City Council in the next month or two. • The city has been approached by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to partner with them on a stream bank stabilization project; there will be more information in the upcoming months. X. Adjournment Motion made by Good to adjourn the April 12, 2016 meeting at 9:55 p.m. Motion seconded by Gieseke. Motion carried. Date: May 17, 2016 Agenda Item #: XIII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Dates, Events & Meetings as of May 17, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Revised_Calendar of Events_As of May 17_2016 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF MAY 17, 2016 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues May 17 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 17 Joint Work Session – Planning Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sat May 21 Public Works Open House 7450 METRO BLVD Mon May 23 Aviation Forum 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon May 30 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues June 7 Work Session – State of Infrastructure/Business Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues June 7 Joint Work Session – Park Board 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues June 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues June 21 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues June 21 Joint Work Session – Transportation Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Mon July 4 Independence Day Parade Tues July 5 Meeting Cancelled Tues July 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues July 19 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 19 Joint Meeting – Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM