HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-06-21 City Council Regular MeetingAgenda
City Council Meeting
City of Edina, Minnesota
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
Tuesday, June 21, 2016
7:00 PM
I.Call To Order
II.Roll Call
III.Approval of Meeting Agenda
IV.Community Comment
During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents
to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the
past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future
consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three
minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same
issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that
are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during
Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or
Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council
might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting.
V.Adoption of Consent Agenda
All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the
Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the
item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered
immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda.
(Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to
approve.)
A.Approve Minutes of June 7, 2016 Work Session and June 7, 2016
Regular City Council Meeting
B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 06/02/2016
TOTAL: $662,522.13 And Per Pre-List Dated 6/16/2016 TOTAL:
$1,044,122.31
C.Heritage Preservation Board Appointment
D.Resolution No. 2016-62 Approving Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Between Homeland Security and Edina
Police Department
E.Resolution No. 2016-64 Approving Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Between Internet Crimes Against
Children (ICAC) Task Force and Edina Police Department
F.Resolution No. 2016-65 Appointing Election Judges For August 9,
2016
G.Minnesota Department of Health Master Grant Contract
Amendment
H.Authorize Public Improvement And Special Assessment
Agreements
I.Request for Purchase - ENG 16-13 Xerxes Avenue Sidewalk
Improvements
J.Request for Purchase - Comprehensive Water Resources
Management Plan Update
K.Request for Purchase - Approve Proposal for Geotechnical
Evaluation Services for the 2017 Neighborhood Improvement
Areas
L.TraGc Safety Report of May 4, 2016
M.Resolution No. 2016-66 Approving Cooperative Construction
Agreement With Department of Transportation
N.Ordinance No. 2016-10 Amending Chapter 24 of Edina City
Code
O.Request For Purchase: City Hall Cleaning Service
VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations
A.Accept Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) For Year
Ended December 31, 2015
B.May Speak Up, Edina Presentation
VII.Public Hearings
During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony
after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to
testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your
testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all
speakers and to allow the eGcient conduct of a public hearing,
speakers must observe the following guidelines:
Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor
may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks
or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the
matter under consideration.
In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in
attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any
other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed.
A.Ordinance No. 2016-08 & Resolution No. 2016-60 Rezoning from
PCD-4 to PUD-1, Phoenix Plaza at 3901 70th Street for Hector
Vinas
B.Resolution No.2016-61, Site Plan Review to remodel and expand
7625 Cahill Road for Mini Storage, Buhl Investors.
VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council
Members present to approve except where noted)
A.Braemar Winter Recreation Area
B.Ordinance No. 2016-09 Amending Chapter 4 Concerning
Alcoholic Beverages
IX.Correspondence And Petitions
A.Correspondence
B.Minutes
1.Minutes: Planning Commission Meeting April 27, 2016
2.Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission April 21, 2016
3.Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission May 12, 2016
4.Heritage Preservation Board Minutes, May 10, 2016
X.Aviation Noise Update
XI.Mayor and Council Comments
XII.Manager's Comments
XIII.Schedule of Meetings and Events as of June 21, 2016
XIV.Adjournment
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the
public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliKcation, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861
72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Minutes
From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Minutes of June 7, 2016 Work Session and
June 7, 2016 Regular City Council Meeting
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve minutes as presented.
INTRODUCTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Draft Minutes of June 7, 2016 Work Session
Draft Minutes of June 7, 2016 Regular City Council Meeting
MINUTES
OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 7, 2016
5:32 P.M.
Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order 5:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Answering rollcall was: Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland.
Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Joe Abood, Golf Course General Manager; Kelly Dumais,
City Management Fellow; Susan Faus, Assistant Park & Recreation Director; Ann Kattreh, Park &
Recreation Director; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director, Brian Olson,
Public Works Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Director;
Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; and Tom Swenson, Golf Course Maintenance
Superintendent. Also in attendance were city consultants; Paul Pasko and Mike Horn, SHE and
Dave Belin, RRC Associates.
SERVICE LINE WARRANTY PROGRAM
Public Works Director introduced Ashley Shiwarski, of Utility Service Partners, Inc. Ms. Shiwarski
explained her firm was the administrator for the National League of Cities Service Line Warranty
Program. Ms. Shiwarski said the program offered an insurance program that covered
maintenance of the buried water and sewer lines running from the public connection to the
exterior of residential property. She explained how such a program could work in Edina and the
reasons it could be beneficial to property owners and to the City. Mr. Olson stated that staff
would prepare a report for a future meeting when the Council could decide whether or not to
participate in such a program.
PARK BOARD WORK SESSION – BRAEMAR WINTER RECREATION UPDATE
Park Board Members attending the joint meeting included: Chair Brenda McCormick, Lauren
Crist Greg Good, Matt Dahlien, Daniel Gieseke, Koren Hawk Nelson, Michael Miller, Randy
Meyer, and Julie Strother.
Paul Pasko of SEH and Dave Belin of RRC Associates presented an update of a proposed program
that would make artificial snow allowing Nordic skiing on groomed tracks and two hills of tubing
at Braemar Golf Course during a ten to twelve week season each winter. The various options were
outlined and some very preliminary pro formas were reviewed. The Council will receive a further
update and have an opportunity for discussion at a future meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Minutes/Edina City Council Work Session/May 3, 2016
2
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 21, 2016.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Page 1
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 7, 2016
7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.
II. ROLLCALL
Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland.
III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED
Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting
agenda.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT
No one appeared to comment.
V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving the consent
agenda as revised to remove Items V.J. 2016-2017 City Insurance Renewals, V.K. Planning
Commission Appointment, and V.L. 2016-2017 Student Board and Commission
Appointments as follows:
V.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of May 17, 2016
V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated May 12, 2016, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund $170,409.37; Police
Special Revenue $8,886.55; Working Capital Fund $326,172.58; PIR Construction
Fund $9,040.00; Equipment Replacement Fund $2,896.00; Cando Fund $4,644.00; Art
Center Fund $3,671.44; Golf Dome Fund $2,960.88; Aquatic Center Fund $1,587.83;
Golf Course Fund $89,922.78; Ice Arena Fund $44,618.10; Sports Dome Fund
$10,620.82; Edinborough Park Fund $3,973.82; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $8,120.19;
Liquor Fund $219,316.63; Utility Fund $450,082.09; Storm Sewer Fund $800.45; Risk
Management ISF $4,021.51; Centennial TIF District $4,021.51; Southdale 2 District
$250.00; Payroll Fund $15,197.41; TOTAL $1,378,778.89; and, for receipt of payment
of claims dated May 19, 2016, and consisting of 38 pages; General Fund $131,010.19;
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $2,933.98; Arts and Culture Fund $6,500.00;
Working Capital Fund $249,475.40; Equipment Replacement Fund $12,520.00; Cando
Fund $8,958.25; Art Center Fund $2,687.76; Aquatic Center Fund $7,246.62; Golf
Course Fund $71,746.40; Ice Arena Fund $25,569.68; Edinborough Park Fund
$10,418.86; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,834.46; Liquor Fund $155,995.78; Utility
Fund $327,677.35; Storm Sewer Fund $53,922.46; Recycling Fund $37,184.67; Risk
Management ISF $303,458.50; PSTF Agency Fund $5,831.44; Centennial TIF District
$35,795.73; Southdale 2 District $30.00; TOTAL $1,454,797.53; and, for receipt of
payment of claims dated May 26, 2016, and consisting of 31 pages; General Fund
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 7, 2016
Page 2
$108,149.39; Police Special Revenue $1,648.93; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety
$1,791.00; City Hall Debt Service $2,000.00; Working Capital Fund $47,587.87; PIR
Construction Fund $5,582.20; Equipment Replacement Fund $1,537.65; Art Center
Fund $354.03; Golf Course Fund $32,748.30; Ice Arena Fund $13,603.92; Sports Dome
Fund $217.83; Edinborough Park Fund $5,686.90; Centennial Lakes Park Fund
$13,258.37; Liquor Fund $241,174.92; Utility Fund $89,640.46; Storm Sewer Fund
$2,271.33; Risk Management ISF $3,612.96; PSTF Agency Fund $35,389.04;
Centennial TIF District $3,670.00; Grandview TIF District $7,161.90; Payroll Fund
$2,793.15; TOTAL $624,890.36; and, Credit Card Transactions dated February 24,
2016 – March 24, 2016; TOTAL $50,153.55
V.C. Request for Purchase, Contract ENG 16-9 2016 Sidewalk Improvements, awarding the
bid to the recommended low bidder, G.L. Contracting, Inc. at $699,850.17
V.D. Request for Purchase, 2016 GMC Sierra WT, awarding the bid to the recommended
low bidder, Nelson Auto Center Fleet Department at $24,276.17
V.E. Request for Purchase, Contract ENG 15-7 Cornelia Drive Sidewalk, awarding the bid
to the recommended low bidder, G. Urban Companies, Inc. at $318,320.00
V.F. Request for Purchase, New Asphalt Roller – Public Works, awarding the bid to the
recommended bidder, Titan Machinery (NJPA Contract No. 032515) at $47,455.00
V.G. Request for Purchase, Braemar Golf Course HVAC System, awarding the bid to the
recommended bidder, Zeman Construction Centraire Heating & Air Conditioning at
$14,489.00
V.H. Request for Purchase, Network Switches, awarding the bid to the recommended
bidder, CDW (State Contract No. 41910) at $26,245.01
V.I. Request for Purchase, Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal, awarding the bid to
the recommended bidder, Software House International (Minnesota State Contract
No. 48196) at $49,838.60
V.J. 2016-2017 City Insurance Renewals
V.K. Planning Commission Appointment
V.L. 2016-2017 Student Board and Commission Appointments
V.M. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-56, Approving Use of Hennepin County Affordable
Housing Funds
V.N. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-57, Accepting the Southwest Corridor Housing Strategy
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
V.J. 2016-2017 CITY INSURANCE RENEWALS – APPROVED
Assistant City Manager Schaefer answered a question of the Council related to the 36% increase to
the property/casualty renewal total estimated premium. Ms. Schaefer explained that there were
two reasons for the increase. The first was due to an increase in property value because of
Braemar Field, Pamela Park, and the City gymnasiums.
Bill Homeyer, Horizon Agency, explained that the second and main reason for the increase was
because of a change in pricing for the deductible arrangement, specifically the aggregate
deductible cap.
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 7, 2016
Page 3
Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to approve the renewal of
the City’s Worker’s Compensation, Volunteer Accident, and Property/Casualty insurance
through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, effective July 1, 2016.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
V.K. PLANNING COMMISSIONER – APPOINTED
Member Brindle thanked Claudia Carr for her service to the City of Edina as a Planning
Commissioner, noting she had resigned as she was moving out of the City. Member Brindle
made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to appoint James Bennett to the Planning
Commission in a partial term ending March 1, 2019.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
V.L. 2016-2017 STUDENT BOARD AND COMMISSIONER APPOINTMENTS –
RATIFIED
Member Brindle shared that each year the City of Edina accepted applications and
interviewed students for student board and commission seats. She thanked all who
applied. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to ratify student
appointments as follows: Jane Howe, Mollie Mertes, and Alternate Kaitlin Schweiger to the
Arts and Culture Commission; Nina Sokol, McKenna Knapp, and Alternate Emily Behling to
the Community Health Commission; Joanna Kim, Gauri Madhok, and Alternate Jason
Phadnis to the Energy and Environment Commission; Payton Puerzer, Hannah Nemerov, and
Alternate Rozy Eastaugh to the Heritage Preservation Board; Connie Chao, Prasoon Sinha,
and Emily Fan to the Human Rights and Relations Commission; Katherine Hulbert, Ben
Gustafson, and Alternate Connor Kelly to the Park Board; Tanner Jones, Peter Kivimaki, and
Alternate Amy Ma to the Planning Commission; and, Megan Olk, David Koester, and
Alternate Mark Ellenberger to the Transportation Commission.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
VI.A. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY – PRESENTED
Public Works Director Olson introduced Lanya Ross from the Metropolitan Council.
Ms. Ross presented an update to the Council on the Regional Water System. Ms. Ross discussed
statutory responsibility for regional water supply planning, Twin Cities water demand, summer
versus winter water usage, future scenarios, the Master Water Supply Plan, water sustainability
goal, Metropolitan Council water planning process, local water supply plan review process, and
West Metro Sub Regional Work Group. Ms. Ross answered a question of the Council related to
expectations of municipalities in advance of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan.
VI.B. EDINA ROBOTICS “STATE OF STEM” REPORT – PRESENTED
Amy Ma and Brandon Schenk, members of Edina’s Robotics Team “The Green Machine” presented
the State of STEM in Edina. Ms. Ma and Mr. Schenk discussed the team, STEM in Edina schools,
the 2016 robot: Zenith, outreach, and STEM advocacy.
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 7, 2016
Page 4
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file.
VII.A. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY REVISIONS – APPROVED
Engineering Director Presentation
Engineer Millner explained that in March 2016 staff had collected feedback from the City Council
and Transportation Commission about potential revisions to the special assessment policies. Mr.
Millner summarized the changes including creating one assessment policy for the Local and
Municipal State Aid policies, inserting street lights into policy, inserting land use table that used
classes from the comprehensive plan into policy, revising Places of Worship REU value to 0.2 REU’s
per 1,000 square feet, revising corner lot partial REU value calculation to one divided by number of
adjacent streets, and reformatting the policy.
Mr. Millner answered a question of the Council related to transparency and publication of the
Special Assessment Policy.
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m.
Public Testimony
No one appeared to testify.
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public
hearing.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to approve revisions to
the assessment policy.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS
VIII.A. NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH 4900 WEST 77TH
STREET – APPROVED
Manager Neal introduced Jonathan Vlaming from Three Rivers Park District and explained that the
Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail would fill a gap in the regional trail network between Hopkins and
Richfield through Edina.
Mr. Vlaming shared that condemnation proceedings had started for 4900 West 77th Street and
negotiations between the property owner and Three Rivers Park District had led to a Stipulation of
Settlement. The goal for the settlement was to gain the necessary easement with the least cost to
the taxpayer. The required easement area was 7,228 square feet and in exchange, the property
owners would receive 3,250 square feet for parking that would extend partially onto City property.
The property exchange would result in a gain of 3,978 square feet of public space. Mr. Vlaming
answered questions of the Council related to parking and the new location of the trail head.
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to approve the easement
agreement with 62NDS2 Gateway, LLC and Shapiro Enterprises, LLLP for the Nine Mile Creek
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 7, 2016
Page 5
Regional Trail alignment at 4900 West 77th Street or The Gateway Property contingent on an
executed Stipulation of Settlement.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-58: AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS,
SERIES 2016A – ADOPTED
Finance Director Roggeman shared that the City was selling General Obligation Bonds to finance
local street improvements, water utility improvements, sewer utility improvements, storm utility
improvements, and to advance refund the callable maturities of the GO Capital Improvement Plan
Bonds, Series 2007A.
Nick Anhut, Ehlers & Associates, presented the Council with the winning bid from Piper Jaffray at
1.75%. Mr. Anhut answered a question of the Council related to the reaffirmation of the City’s
AAA rating by both Moody and Standard & Poor’s.
Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-58, Authorizing
Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for the Payment of
$17,445,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2016A. Member Swenson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-59 ADOPTED – ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND
DONATIONS
Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City
must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the
donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-59
accepting various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE
Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence.
IX.B. MINUTES:
1. PLANNING COMMISSION, APRIL 13, 2016
2. PLANNING COMMISSION, MARCH 23, 2016
3. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, MARCH 10, 2016
4. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, APRIL 26, 2016
Informational; no action required.
X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received
XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 7, 2016
Page 6
XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received
XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS AND EVENTS AS OF JUNE 7, 2016 – Received
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 21, 2016.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the June 7, 2016, meeting available.
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.B.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Claims
From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated
06/02/2016 TOTAL: $662,522.13 And Per Pre-List
Dated 6/16/2016 TOTAL: $1,044,122.31
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve claims for payment.
INTRODUCTION:
Detailed claims list is attached.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Claims Pre-List Dated 06/02/2016 TOTAL: $662,522.13
Claims Pre-List Dated 06/16/2016 TOTAL: $1,044,122.31
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 1
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 -
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3181 6/2/2016 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
331.39 LINE DIVIDER 00005256 402240 0147606-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
331.39
3182 6/2/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
167.60 402190 2001780 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
150.40 402480 2005111 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
63.20 402479 2005119 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
381.20
3183 6/2/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
466.65 COFFEE 402566 1228563 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
466.65
3184 6/2/2016 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
873.50 STORMWATER MGMT 402380 23270354.00-223 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
873.50
3185 6/2/2016 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC.
38.55 LACING 402567 1001363 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
2,074.65 GLASS 402568 1001707 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
42.28- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 402569 987840 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
2,070.92
3186 6/2/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
75.10 402486 53677000 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
75.10 402662 53677100 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
20.00 402487 53778900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
320.20 402487 53778900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
145.55 402484 53779000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
153.55 402485 53779100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
462.54 402489 6657300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
188.19 402198 93954900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
135.82 402488 93992000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
1,576.05
3187 6/2/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
27.14- RETURN 402432 CO-WO-200694-1- 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1
106.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009481 402638 WO-197759-1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
11.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009482 402637 WO-197762-1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 2
Business Unit
3187 6/2/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued...
23.56 SHEET PROTECTORS 00003054 402431 WO-201490-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
72.39 CORDLESS VACUUM 402243 WO-201559-1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
207.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 402244 WO-201961-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
116.71 PAPER, ENVELOPES 00002172 402573 WO-202569-1 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION
31.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 402572 WO-202652-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
542.77
3188 6/2/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
90.11 CARRYING CASES 402245 118909 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
90.11
3189 6/2/2016 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
5,255.00 PICKLEBALL COURTS 402381 B057936 47095.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ROSLAND PK - PICKLEBALL COURTS
3,300.00 CREEK VALLEY SHELTER 402382 B057937 47098.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Creek Valley Donation
8,555.00
3190 6/2/2016 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC.
83.54 OCE MAINTENANCE 402383 CUST497973 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
83.54
3191 6/2/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO
91.80 402349 67-178 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
869.34 402498 67-218 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
961.14
3192 6/2/2016 104020 DALCO
78.40 SOAP DISPENSER 402387 3028485 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
78.40
3193 6/2/2016 129157 DO-GOOD.BIZ INC
411.87 BULK MAILING 402641 8518-01 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
411.87
3194 6/2/2016 100018 EXPERT T BILLING
1,000.00 APR 2016 BILLINGS 402642 2771 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,000.00
3195 6/2/2016 134730 EXPLORE EDINA
35,412.88 APR 2016 LODGING TAX 402596 4/2016 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES
35,412.88
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 3
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 —
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3195
3196
6/2/2016
6/2/2016
134730 EXPLORE EDINA
100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC
Continued...
2,683.12 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 402597 51440 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
1,262.72 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 402598 51451 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
3,945.84
3197 6/2/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC
3,495.00 WATERLINE REPAIR 00002577 402409 14457 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B
3,495.00
3198 6/2/2016 131734 HORWITZ INC.
1,949.91 POOL BOILER MAINTENANCE 402604 W37723 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
1,949.91
3199 6/2/2016 129508 IMPACT
106.28 EDINA LIQUOR INSERT 402436 113810 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING
3,892.02 MAY 2016 UTILITY BILLS 402436 113810 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
3,998.30
3200 6/2/2016 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC.
317.36 BRACKETS 00005124 402267 224644 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
410.56 BOOTS 00003802 402636 226833 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
727.92
3201 6/2/2016 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC.
59.50 TOILET RENTAL 402437 100481 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
76.50 402438 101214 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
59.50 402439 101215 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
171.24 402440 101458 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
14.87 402441 101459 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
14.87 402442 101460 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
59.50 402443 101461 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
29.74 402444 101462 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
485.72
3202 6/2/2016 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC.
8,294.40 CLUBHOUSE RENOVATION 402608 BRAEMAR 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
8,294.40
3203 6/2/2016 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 4
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 -
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3203 6/2/2016 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI Continued...
7,569.56 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 1160.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE
141.32 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5110.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
107.29 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5210.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
189.62 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5310.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT POOL ADMINISTRATION
553.85 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5410.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
539.03 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5510.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ARENA ADMINISTRATION
148.96 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5552.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV-AUDIT SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION
335.04 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5710.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
220.82 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5760.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
411.49 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5820.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT 50TH STREET GENERAL
943.27 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5860.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,073.75 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5840.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
2,859.21 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5902.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
406.79 2015 AUDIT 402170 40135 5932.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GENERAL STORM SEWER
15,500.00
3204 6/2/2016 101483 MENARDS
134.51 DISPATCH REMODEL 00001716 402171 10444 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
139.83 DISPATCH REMODEL 00001832 402172 11174 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
20.85 DISPATCH REMODEL 00001929 402173 12521 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
9.57 OUTLETS 00005353 402276 12826 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
33.45 HAND TOOLS 00001967 402277 13155 5921.6556 TOOLS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
11.58 CONCRETE 00001972 402278 13171 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
119.31 PAILS, TOOLS, GLOVES 00007501 402274 13842 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
17.18 LED LAMP DISPLAY 00001062 402275 13912 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
486.28
3205 6/2/2016 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY
35.00 WIPERS 402174 38352 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
135.00 TOWELS 402174 38352 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
170.00
3206 6/2/2016 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS
1,873.75 TABLE COVERS, CANDLES, CUPS 402612 398415 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
234.73 TABLE COVERS 402613 399802 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
2,108.48
3207 6/2/2016 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC.
12.00 UNIFORMS 00005604 402284 NIA9095 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
94.34 UNIFORMS 00005604 402284 NIA9095 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 5
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3207 6/2/2016 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. Continued...
199.66 UNIFORMS 00005604 402284 N1A9095 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
306.00
3208 6/2/2016 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC.
757.00 HVAC CONTRACT 402177 67449 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
757.00
3209 6/2/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
537.76 TOWELS, SOAP, LINERS 402619 9852 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
345.72 LINERS, DISINFECTANT 402620 9999 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
883.48
3210 6/2/2016 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC.
1,156.04 DOOR LOCK & UNLOCK BUTTON 402621 75519 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
2,586.70 SURVEILANCE CAMERAS 402622 75547 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
3,742.74
3211 6/2/2016 101000 RJM PRINTING INC.
48.50 BUSINESS CARDS 402323 90683 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
98.50 BUSINESS CARDS 402452 90773 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
147.00
3212 6/2/2016 104672 SPRINT
16.93 873184124 402178 162 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17.08 873184124 402178 162 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
44.40 873184124 402178 162 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
49.72 873184124 402178 162 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING
51.09 873184124 402178 162 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
68.25 873184124 402178 162 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE
91.52 873184124 402178 162 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
115.34 873184124 402178 162 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
17.01 873184124 402178 162 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
102.46 873184124 402178 162 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING)
17.82 873184124 402178 162 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY
591.62
3213 6/2/2016 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
17.00 SEAL, TUBE 00005259 402424 162752 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 6
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 -
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3214 6/2/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA Continued...
4,380.25 402237 0152176-IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
114.50 402551 0152179-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,055.00 402552 0152717-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,055.00 402554 0152720-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
127.50 402553 0152721-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
6,732.25
3215 6/2/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
890.85 402680 426447-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
244.20 402378 426449-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,352.28 402555 426642-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING
2,487.33
404589 6/2/2016 100612 A.M. LEONARD
21.84 GARDEN TOOL 00002351 402558 C116029115 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
21.84
404590 6/2/2016 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM
195.00 SMART DRIVING CLASS 402238 5/19 CLASS 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
195.00
404591 6/2/2016 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC
371.35 HOSE PARTS 402239 1-874339 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
371.35
404592 6/2/2016 124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST
2,950.08 JANITORIAL SERVICE 402379 9524879 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL
2,950.08
404593 6/2/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY
102.69 GOLF BALLS 402562 902300486 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
120.00 GOLF BALLS 402563 902300487 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
118.40 SHIRTS 402559 902406957 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
61.84 SHOES 402560 902534415 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
114.17 SHOES 402561 902559864 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
517.10
404594 6/2/2016 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
191.45 COFFEE 402241 141266 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
191.45
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 7
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 —
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404594
404595
6/2/2016
6/2/2016
105991 AUS COFFEE COMPANY
102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
Continued-.
3,272.00 DISPATCH SETUP E911 402304 59125 2310.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES E911
575.00 TEMP DISPATCH SETUP 402303 59131 2310.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES E911
3,847.00
404596 6/2/2016 138437 ANNUNZIATO, BEVERLY
50.00 ADMISSIONS REFUND 402564 052616 5501.4542 SPECTATOR FEES ICE ARENA REVENUES
50.00
404597 6/2/2016 138426 ANTHONY THOMAS INC.
39.98 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 402429 6612 KENNY PL 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
39.98
404598 6/2/2016 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
1,045.65 PIPE REPAIR FILL LINE 402565 44848 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION
1,045.65
404599 6/2/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
178.00 402193 3100828 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
968.50 402191 3100829 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
1,801.50 402192 3100831 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
2,318.75 402481 3102371 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,203.12 402482 3102372 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
8.52- 402658 346616 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
7.00- 402659 346617 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
7.00- 402657 346618 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
27.82- 402660 346619 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
7.84- 402194 346620 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
900.00- 402196 346621 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
7.98- 402195 346622 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
6,503.71
404600 6/2/2016 106304 ASPEN MILLS
139.50 UNIFORMS 00003797 402430 181556 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
139.50
404601 6/2/2016 136457 AUSTIN, ROBIN
66.00 TENNIS PROGRAM REFUND 373780 060215 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL
66.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 8
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 -
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404601
404602
6/2/2016
6/2/2016
136457 AUSTIN, ROBIN
136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC
Continued...
453.00 402197 8237 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
680.00 402661 8296 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
283.00 402336 8297 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
255.00 402483 8374 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
1,671.00
404603 6/2/2016 136794 BERG, MELANIE
68.00 SIGNED UP TWICE FOR TENNIS 377649 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
68.00
404604 6/2/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.
144.00 PIZZA 402570 4633728 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
288.00 PIZZA 402571 4634579 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
432.00
404605 6/2/2016 125139 BERNICK'S
436.80 402199 298359 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
40.00 402490 299003 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
961.02 402491 299004 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
390.80 402337 299005 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
425.85 402663 299006 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
2,254.47
404606 6/2/2016 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
126.95 COFFEE 402242 T81040 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
126.95
404607 6/2/2016 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS
118.77 CANVAS PANELS 00009484 402639 6049774 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
118.77
404608 6/2/2016 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
591.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003714 402305 82126988 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
25.56 00003716 402306 82146391 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
197.00 00003714 402307 82148897 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
394.00 00003716 402308 82148898 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
7.39 00003717 402309 82151655 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
122.99 00003717 402310 82155334 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 9
Business Unit
404608 6/2/2016 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC Continued...
1,337.94
404609 6/2/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
626.50 402493 134015 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
344.50 402664 134016 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \MNE 50TH ST SELLING
1,640.00 402200 134018 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING
825.00 402338 134113 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
727.50 402492 134115 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
4,163.50
404610 6/2/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
991.40 402202 1080473230 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
486.90 402201 1080473231 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE 50TH ST SELLING
574.30 402204 1080474603 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
33.07 402203 1080474664 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
5,207.25 402343 1080476407 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
1,889.28 402340 1080476410 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
45.15 402339 1080476411 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
682.30 402341 1080476412 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
143.49 402494 1080476413 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
676.15 402344 1080476425 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
7,590.12 402345 1080476426 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
671.92 402342 1080476430 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,171.50 402495 1080477834 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
589.75 402496 1080477835 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
156.00- 402205 2080132437 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
12.00- 402497 2080135472 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
74.97- 402206 2080137320 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
20,509.61
404611 6/2/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC
880.00 402207 1090559969 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
4,789.75 402209 1090564580 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
48.60 402210 1090564721 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
936.85 402208 1090564722 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
2,735.00 402211 1090564723 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
5,040.95 402346 1090565580 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
14,431.15
404612 6/2/2016 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC.
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 10
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO4
6/2/2016 -
Doc No Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404612 6/2/2016 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. Continued...
234.94 GOLF BALLS 402574 1002505851 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
207.11 GOLF BALLS 402575 1002505930 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
442.05
404613 6/2/2016 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
9.10 PREMIX 00001936 402246 12657611-00 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION
193.81 SWIVEL DISK 402247 12659083-00 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION
202.91
404614 6/2/2016 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF
200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/14/16 402332 051316 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
200.00
404615 6/2/2016 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
807.98 CLUBS 402586 926863899 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
444.00- REBATE CREDIT 402587 926866753 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
333.00 DRIVER 402579 926867458 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
162.68 CLUB 402580 926870299 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
162.68 CLUB 402582 926871028 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
170.33 CLUBS 402583 926871082 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
258.75 DRIVER 402584 926871087 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
697.06 CLUBS 402577 926871141 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,007.56 CLUBS 402578 926871146 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
88.15 CLUB 402585 926871211 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
234.00 WEDGES 402576 926871218 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,377.26 CLUBS 402581 926871231 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
4,855.45
404616 6/2/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
50.30 402348 00011182 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
3,053.85 402347 00011183 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
518.80 402212 905363 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
480.00 402213 906684 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
511.75 402665 911496 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
4,614.70
404617 6/2/2016 129923 CAWLEY
13.59 NAME BADGES 402433 V375287 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES
13.59
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 11
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404618 6/2/2016 101615 GEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. Continued...
1,012.85 CONCRETE TOOLS 00001806 402248 261120 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,012.85
404619 6/2/2016 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
44.84 10089900-4 402187 10089900-5/16 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1,853.75 10437426-9 402188 10437426-5/16 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
767.29 5546504-1 402185 5546504-5/16 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
456.04 5563827-4 402183 5563827-5/16 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
2,026.55 5591458-4 402186 5591458-5/16 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL
53.48 5596524-8 402311 5596524-5/16 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
420.95 8034001-1 402184 8034001-5/16 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING
31.26 9546705-6 402384 9546705-5/16 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION
721.67 9724639-1 402189 9724639-5/16 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
6,375.83
404620 6/2/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK
98.91 612 E77-0056 402155 0056-5/16 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911
104.90 612 E23-0652 402156 0652-5/16 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911
203.81
404621 6/2/2016 135835 CENTURYLINK
1,335.45 612-D08-2053-053 402157 2053-5/16 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911
1,335.45
404622 6/2/2016 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS
838.61 AQUATIC CENTER POSTCARDS 402588 COM-0882 5310.6235 POSTAGE POOL ADMINISTRATION
838.61
404623 6/2/2016 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES
199.84 00086676-0330288022 402249 330288022-5/16 5310.6189 SEWER & WATER POOL ADMINISTRATION
518.50 00105263-0335037016 402251 335037016-5/16 1646.6189 SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
470.58 00113607-0342163045 402250 342163045-5/16 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5,741.78 00103426-0345052006 402385 345052006-5/16 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING
6,930.70
404624 6/2/2016 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL
110.54 ASPHALT MIX 402252 IN00015715 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
110.54
404625 6/2/2016 102165 CLEVELAND GOLF
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 12
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 — 6/2/2016
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404625 6/2/2016 102165 CLEVELAND GOLF Continued...
240.00 GOLF BALLS 402589 4678038 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
240.00
404626 6/2/2016 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS
278.08 402386 0168573124 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
278.08
404627 6/2/2016 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL
897.49 JUNE 2016 MAINTENANCE 402158 EDINA LIQUOR 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY
897.49
404628 6/2/2016 120433 COMCAST
33.79 8772 10 614 0373022 402640 373022-5/16 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
25.98 8772 10 614 0496856 402590 496856-5/19 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM
59.77
404629 6/2/2016 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO.
2,893.88 HOT MIX 402253 051516 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
2,893.88
404630 6/2/2016 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO.
874.01 CLAY, SUPPLIES 00009480 402160 INV000108365 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
164.76 KILN PARTS 00009483 402159 R200408548 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,038.77
404631 6/2/2016 138421 CONTOYANNIS, JOHN
317.33 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 402312 4608 CASCADE LN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
317.33
404632 6/2/2016 130852 COTTEN, JASON
71.57 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 385003 101415 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
71.57
404633 6/2/2016 138423 CRAMER, RICHARD
19.32 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 402313 6427 TIMBER 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
RIDGE
19.32
404634 6/2/2016 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES
1,705.02 UNIFORM SHIRTS 402254 47378 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 — 6/2/2016
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 13
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404634 6/2/2016 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES Continued...
1,046.00 STAFF APPAREL 402591 47469 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS
513.94 AQUATIC BIRTHDAY BACKPACKS 402161 47949 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION
3,264.96
404635 6/2/2016 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
156.02 114-10079853-6 402592 GOLF-5/16 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
156.02
404636 6/2/2016 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO.
324.72 LUMBER FOR DUGOUTS 00001864 402255 1604-637250 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
324.72
404637 6/2/2016 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
37.11 MAGNETIC TRAYS 00005257 402256 96706 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
11.97 CIRCUIT TESTER 00005258 402257 96744 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
49.08
404638 6/2/2016 11880$ DISCOUNT STEEL INC.
12.33 SCREENING 00001068 402258 4100411 5934.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM LIFT STATION MAINT
12.33
404639 6/2/2016 138427 DIXON, RALPHARD
156.00 OFFICIATING FEES 402434 052016 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
156.00
404640 6/2/2016 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC
134.00 402666 11638 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
134.00
404641 6/2/2016 129504 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
11,133.00 HOLIDAY CLASSIC 402593 BRAEMAR ARENA 5501.4542 SPECTATOR FEES ICE ARENA REVENUES
11,133.00
404642 6/2/2016 129504 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
25,651.50 SPECTATOR FEES 402594 BOYS 5501.4542 SPECTATOR FEES ICE ARENA REVENUES
25,651.50
404643 6/2/2016 129504 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
5,466.00 SPECTATOR FEES 402595 GIRLS 5501.4542 SPECTATOR FEES ICE ARENA REVENUES
5,466.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 14
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount
6/2/2016 -
Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404643 6/2/2016
404644 6/2/2016
129504 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
102309 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC.
Continued-.
2,635.80 SIREN MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 402314 33975 421460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVIL DEFENSE EQUIPMENT
2,635.80
404645 6/2/2016 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
255.00 PANASONIC TRIAL 402315 RS4352 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
255.00 PANASONIC TRIAL 402315 RS4352 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
510.00
404646 6/2/2016 117483 ENGELE, LEE
200.00 FARMER'S MARKET 6/16/16 402335 051316 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
200.00
404647 6/2/2016 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC.
165.87 402214 5658 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
165.87 402667 5659 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
331.74
404648 6/2/2016 138428 ERIKSSON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES LTD
1,200.00 GALLERIA TRAFFIC STUDY 402435 16345 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES
1,200.00
404649 6/2/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
576.05 BATTERIES 402316 1-4950333 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
186.44 BEARING 402263 1-4982275 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
22.71 GASKET SET 402389 1-4987487 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
9.67 GASKET 402392 1-4991401 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
20.71 BELT 402393 1-4991498 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
549.65 BATTERIES 402394 1-Z07781 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
47.66 FILTERS 402390 24-1287486 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
335.25 PADS, ROTORS 402262 69-222665 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
213.42 BEARING, NITRILE GLOVES 402264 69-222749 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
103.74 SENSORS 402261 69-222773 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
10.06 MINIATURE LAMPS 402260 69-222828 1553,6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
39.90 MINIATURE LAMPS 402259 69-222916 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
53.36 PLUGS 402388 69-223658 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
5.38 PART 402391 69-224385 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
49.22 BATTERY 402265 70-269785 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,223.22
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 15
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 -
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404649
404650
6/2/2016
6/2/2016
100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
106035 FASTENAL COMPANY
Continued...
130.81 LIFT STATION PIPE WORK 00001954 402395 MNTC2137142 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
29.04 LIFT STATION PIPE WORK 00001962 402396 MNTC2137143 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
50.47 LIFT STATION PIPE WORK 00001962 402397 MNTC2137186 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
3.73 LIFT STATION PIPE WORK 00001962 402398 MNTC2137192 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
214.05
404651 6/2/2016 138445 FERGESEN, RICHARD D
194.75 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 402643 5351 KELLOGG 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
194.75
404652 6/2/2016 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING
550.00 WNDOW CLEANING 402399 2315-15751 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
550.00
404653 6/2/2016 136205 FREEMAN, BRANDON
12.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 370078 042015 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
12.08
404654 6/2/2016 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS
1,347.04 APPAREL 402599 41137762 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,347.04
404655 6/2/2016 103185 GERTENS
792.00 TREES, JUNIPERS 00001892 402400 386891/1 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
792.00
404656 6/2/2016 125935 GOLF SCORECARDS INC.
1,029.55 SCORECARDS 402600 42383 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION
1,029.55
404657 6/2/2016 101103 GRAINGER
513.90 DOOR CLOSER 00006364 402317 9103391398 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE
288.50 SAFETY GLASSES, EAR PROTECTIME1006364 402318 9103391406 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
67.28 SHOWERHEADS 00002170 402601 9113543814 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
534.38 PIPE WRENCHES 00001044 402402 9114880777 5912.6556 TOOLS WELL HOUSES
55.44 LENS CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001048 402401 9114947691 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1,459.50
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 16
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 —
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404658 6/2/2016 120201 GRANICUS INC. Continued_
500.00 SPEAK UP EDINA 402319 76180 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
690.00 WEBSTREAMING 402319 76180 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
1,190.00
404659 6/2/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
408.75 402216 MN00004540 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING
163.50 402215 MN00004641 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
932.75 402499 MN00004973 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1MNE VERNON SELLING
1,505.00
404660 6/2/2016 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES
269.60 POKER CHIPS 402602 57381 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
269.60
404661 6/2/2016 102426 HALE, WILLIAM
250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/16/16 402334 051316 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
250.00
404662 6/2/2016 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
125.10- RETURN 402406 F486359 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
349.78 PIPE REPAIR 00001794 402405 F514781 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER
4,445.70 LIFT STATION GATE VALVE 00001996 402403 F534121 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
854.25 LIFT STATION GATE VALVE 00001996 402404 F534566 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
5,524.63
404663 6/2/2016 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS
843.98 JUN 2016 COBRA 402645 65806241 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
12,923.90 JUN 2016 PREMIUMS 402644 65828158 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
13,767.88
404664 6/2/2016 138438 HEINLE, KARA
45.00 WINE & CANVAS 402603 3/23/16 EVENT 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES
45.00
404665 6/2/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
1,579.30 APR 2016 RADIO FLEET FEES 402162 1000076362 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2,192.44 ARP 2016 RADIO FLEET FEES 402163 1000076363 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
3,771.74
404666 6/2/2016 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
5/31/2016 14:10:53
•Page - 17
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404666 6/2/2016 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG Continued...
999.95 COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADES 402407 589552 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
4,418.31 DESK LIFT 402408 589979 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL
5,418.26
404667 6/2/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
773.40 402217 827019 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
1,292.50 402668 828241 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
1,642.63 402500 828430 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
1,157.50 402352 828484 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
54.00 402351 828707 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
279.50 402350 828752 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
5,199.53
404668 6/2/2016 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC
388.44 RENTAL BROCHURES 402164 34365 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
388.44
404669 6/2/2016 138422 HUSS, PATRICK
181.64 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 402320 4200 OAKDALE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
AVE
181.64
404670 6/2/2016 129430 HYDROTECH SYSTEMS LTD
187.04 ANODE 402605 SSF174 5330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FLOWRIDER
187.04
404671 6/2/2016 101146 IMPACT TELECOM
386.04 402684 051716 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
386.04
404672 6/2/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY
183.00 402218 39680 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
567.90 402501 39890 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
408.50 402353 39921 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
1,159.40
404673 6/2/2016 129619 INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
208.50 COMPRESSOR PARTS 00001977 402266 23541488 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT
208.50
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 18
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404674 6/2/2016 138240 INTERMEDIX Continued...
4,977.68 APRIL 2016 BILLINGS 402410 INVADPI18575 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
4,977.68
404675 6/2/2016 100828 JERRY'S FOODS
47.20 PROPANE TANKS FOR THE GRILL 402683 043016 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
47.20
404676 6/2/2016 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE
3.91 402606 5/16-LIQ 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
6.23 402606 5/16-LIQ 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
10.14
404677 6/2/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
159.00 402354 2510850 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
1,750.55 402219 2510866 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
6,879.40 402221 2510887 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
88.15 402220 2510888 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
7,481.91 402503 2510926 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
183.83 402506 2510927 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
39.05 402669 2510930 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
4,560.00 402502 2510932 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
5,379.95 402504 2510934 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
104.35 402505 2510935 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
26,626.19
404678 6/2/2016 138425 JOELSON, ERICA
98.39 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 402411 052516 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE
98.39
404679 6/2/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
1,004.55 402224 5444731 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
3,774.54 402225 5444734 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING
682.59 402223 5444737 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING
216.18 402355 5444739 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
3,607.72 402222 5444748 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1.16 402356 5444750 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
148.64 402523 5450337 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING
4.64 402527 5450338 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
72.68 402520 5450339 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1.16 402507 5450340 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 19
Business Unit
404679 6/2/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued...
270.11 402519 5450342 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
125.56 402518 5450346 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
608.48 402513 5450349 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
135.00 402517 5450351 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,622.67 402510 5450352 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,762.34 402514 5450353 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,782.71 402509 5450354 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,763.49 402515 5450355 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
213.05 402508 5450356 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
5,260.65 402512 5450357 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,242.63 402511 5450358 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
875.60 402516 5450360 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,971.84 402521 5450365 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
825.80 402524 5450366 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
325.01 402528 5450368 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
17.40 402525 5450369 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
8,009.02 402526 5450370 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
99.98 402530 5450371 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
6,122.85 402529 5450372 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
3,083.78 402522 5450373 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
51.16- 402672 574178 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
9.09- 402671 574791 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
10.00- 402670 574792 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
5.38- 402358 574794 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
18.00- 402359 574795 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
20.19- 402357 574796 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
48,518.01
404680 6/2/2016 103230 JOHNSTON'S SALES & SERVICE
185.46 VACUUM REPAIRS 402607 14012 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE
185.46
404681 6/2/2016 116901 K.C. GROVES TREE EXPERTS
50.69 5002 BRUCE AVE 402268 TAX DUE 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE
50.69
404682 6/2/2016 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC.
1,906.68 RAMP STAIR RESTORATION 402270 7789684 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
309.88 JERRYS RAMP LEAKAGE 402269 7789685 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
2,216.56
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 20
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 —
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404682
404683
6/2/2016
6/2/2016
124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC.
133746 LAACKE & JOYS CO.
Continued...
3,270.00 CHAIRS 402271 83334 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT E911
3,270.00
404684 6/2/2016 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
1,000.00 CLAIM PAID 402647 00037467 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
196.46 CLAIM PAID 402646 CLAIM 15150 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
1,196.46
404685 6/2/2016 135867 LIBATION PROJECT
259.00 402226 4263 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
434.00 402531 4303 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
693.00
404686 6/2/2016 130079 LINK, JOSHUA
122.95 WORK SHOES 402648 052616 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
122.95
404687 6/2/2016 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC.
1,690.00 MILLING SUPPLIES 402273 12241 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
2,203.96 MILLING SUPPLIES 402272 12243 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
3,893.96
404688 6/2/2016 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC.
43.20- CREDIT 00005106 402166 10227 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
487.38- CREDIT 00005952 402167 10230 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
212.37- CREDIT 402168 10237 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
278.28- CREDIT 402169 10273 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4,585.00 COMMUNICATION SETS 00001763 402165 1160215 5923.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT COLLECTION SYSTEMS
3,563.77
404689 6/2/2016 137549 MALUEG, ONA
74.11 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 387512 111815 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
74.11
404690 6/2/2016 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP
105.00 SPEAKER REPAIRS 402445 508837 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
105.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 -- 6/2/2016
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 21
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404691 6/2/2016 137929 MAXEY, ROXANNE Continued...
53.63 BALLOONS FOR SKATE SHOW 402446 SKATE SCHOOL 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION
53.63
404692 6/2/2016 137645 MEYER-RUUD, JESSE
166.86 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 402279 052416 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
166.86
404693 6/2/2016 130635 MILLNER, CHAD
200.56 MILEAGE! PARKING 402321 REIMBURSE 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL
200.56
404694 6/2/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER
1,781.25 REPLACE GATE VALVE RISER 00001008 402280 35208 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
1,781.25
404695 6/2/2016 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
35.00 50011 HOSPITALITY FEE 402610 1891 5520.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS
35.00 50014 HOSPITALITY FEE 402609 1894 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION
35.00 50279 HOSPITALITY FEE 402649 23657 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
105.00
404696 6/2/2016 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT
76.97 OIL 402281 P05730 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
76.97
404697 6/2/2016 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND
396.00 EVOC DRIVING CLASS 402412 629430-5132 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE
396.00
404698 6/2/2016 138087 MINNESOTA POND & PATIO
3,225.00 REPAIRS TO WATER FEATURES 402611 052516 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
3,225.00
404699 6/2/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS
78.00 POSTCARDS 402650 20493 2610.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC ART
78.00
404700 6/2/2016 120024 MULCAHY COMPANY INC.
220.99 BOILER SEQUENCER 00001911 402447 307163 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
220.99
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 22
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 —
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404700
404701
6/2/2016
6/2/2016
120024 MULCAHY COMPANY INC.
124571 MURPHY, WENDY
Continued...
72.26 SUPPLIES 402448 REIMBURSE 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS
72.26
404702 6/2/2016 130453 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC
384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 402449 INV-089587 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 402449 INV-089587 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
384.22 THEATER ADVERTISING 402449 INV-089587 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
1,152.66
404703 6/2/2016 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H.
533.89 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 402450 052516 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION
533.89
404704 6/2/2016 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING
224.00 JULY & AUG ART CENTER ADS 402651 1115550 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
224.00
404705 6/2/2016 103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER
26,972.95 NEW POLICE VEHICLE 402175 F6805 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
26,972.95 NEW POLICE VEHICLE 402176 F6806 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
53,945.90
404706 6/2/2016 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
1,084.60 SIGN MATERIAL 00001186 402282 TI-0297969 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
1,084.60
404707 6/2/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC.
616.88 UNIFORMS 402283 986601075 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
126.63 SHIRTS 402615 987114582 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
324.00 GOLF BALLS 402614 987195854 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,067.51
404708 6/2/2016 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC
101.84 BULBS 00005240 402285 41151 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
101.84
404709 6/2/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
716.46 TRAILER BINDER TIE DOWNS 00001814 402287 578532 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 — 6/2/2016
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 23
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404709 6/2/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES Continued...
51.10 PLAYGROUND CHAIN 00001997 402286 581019 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
767.56
404710 6/2/2016 101659 ORKIN
144.35 28464293 PEST CONTROL 402413 28464293-5/16 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL
124.30 28650543 PEST CONTROL 402414 28650543-5/16 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
268.65
404711 6/2/2016 136189 P&W GOLF SUPPLY LLC
398.68 PUTTERS 00002353 402616 INV10028 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
398.68
404712 6/2/2016 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC
48.96 HANGERS 402322 368021 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
48.96
404713 6/2/2016 121026 PALDA & SONS INC.
154,160.44- PARTIAL PAYMENT NO 10 402451 BIRCHCREST 07115.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S115 VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK
156,087.30- PARTIAL PAYMENT NO 10 402451 BIRCHCREST 01410.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON
7,782.18 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO 10 402451 BIRCHCREST 07105.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S105 TH100 SIDEWALK
92,762.15 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO 10 402451 BIRCHCREST 05540.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON
119,130.25 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO 10 402451 BIRCHCREST 03482.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON
106,258.32 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO 10 402451 BIRCHCREST 04398.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON
15,685.16
404714 6/2/2016 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY
147.00 402532 16089 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
120.00 402227 16095 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
240.00 402533 16103 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
507.00
404715 6/2/2016 100347 PAUST1S WINE COMPANY
951.90 402228 8548454-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,965.00 402361 8549161-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
143.70 402673 8549165-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,279.88 402360 8549168-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
4,340.48
404716 6/2/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
519.28 402415 52890755 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 24
Business Unit
404716 6/2/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Continued...
519.28
404717 6/2/2016 131877 PETTY CASH
1,400.00 START-UP FUNDS FOR AC 402617 2016 5300.1040 CHANGE FUND AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
1,400.00
404718 6/2/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
1.16- 402364 235282 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1NINE 50TH ST SELLING
10.25- 402543 236717 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
3.48 402231 2952527 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
273.42 402362 2975000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
73.16 402363 2975963 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
1,942.26 402230 2978882 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
270.55 402229 2978884 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
.20 402537 2982667 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
37.67 402539 2982671 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
238.81 402540 2982674 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
363.50 402541 2982675 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
481.66 402542 2982677 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,159.91 402536 2982680 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
65.16 402538 2982681 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
1,154.72 402535 2982682 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,172.72 402534 2982683 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
8,225.81
404719 6/2/2016 100119 PING
150.24 GOLF BAG 402618 13301877 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
150.24
404720 6/2/2016 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC.
108.00 402232 K-16599760 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
108.00
404721 6/2/2016 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC
2,685.50 AD SALES COMMISSION 402623 516151-7 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
2,685.50
404722 6/2/2016 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH
19.00 CLASS A LICENSE 379224 REIMBURSE 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
19.00
R55CKR2 LOGISI01
CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 25
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/2/2016 — 6/2/2016
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404722 6/212016
404723 6/2/2016
129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH
101940 RIVERLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
Continued...
350.00 TRAINING 402624 147767 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
350.00
404724 6/2/2016 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
123.28 SOFTENER SALT 402453 00332593 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
123.28
404725 6/2/2016 116393 ROGERS, RUSS
250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/14/16 402331 051316 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
250.00
404726 6/2/2016 124447 RUM RIVER BRASS BAND
150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/15/16 402333 051316 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIALLAKESADMIN EXPENSE
150.00
404727 6/2/2016 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS
2,906.00 WOOD WASTE REMOVAL 402288 910073838 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE
2,906.00
404728 6/2/2016 121678 SAABYE, PETER
8.67 MAGNETIC BIT HOLDER 402454 ZAMBONI REPAIR 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT
8.67
404729 6/2/2016 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
331.35 0402 37306935 0 402324 VAN VALKENBURG 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG
331.35
404730 6/2/2016 138424 SANFORD, BRYAN
3.20 KETCHUP/MUSTARD 402325 REIMBURSE 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINTOFCOURSE&GROUNDS
3.20
404731 6/2/2016 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC.
3,659.23 FILTERS 00001843 402417 135248 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
3,042.46 FILTERS 00001844 402416 135327 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
6,701.69
404732 6/2/2016 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP.
868.74 QUARTERLY BILLING 402289 8104264618 1653.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 26
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 —
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404732 6/2/2016 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. Continued...
868.74
404733 6/2/2016 100991 SCHWAB-VOLLHABER-LUBRATT
555.41 CONDENSOR FOR IT ROOM 00001857 402418 INV111667 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL
555.41
404734 6/2/2016 100995 SEH
2,170.74 54TH ST BID DOCS 402419 314969 10096.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BR6 54TH STREET BRIDGE
2,779.00 54TH ST BID DOCS 402419 314969 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR
229.33 54TH ST BID DOCS 402419 314969 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Arden Park D Reconstruction
1,013.95 54TH ST BID DOCS 402419 314969 04407.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST RECONSTRUCTION
2,846.47 ARDEN PARK BID DOCS 402422 314970 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON
4,408.56 WHITE OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 402420 314972 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A
1,600.74 WHITE OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 402420 314972 01438.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 Recon White Oaks C
2,258.89 WHITE OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 402420 314972 03492.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Morningside A & White Oaks C
2,551.66 WHITE OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 402420 314972 05558.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Morningside A & White Oaks C
1,893.51 WHITE OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD 402420 314972 04416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Morningside A & White Oaks C
41,469.58 TRACY RAB 402421 314973 01430.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR
63,222.43
404735 6/2/2016 133883 SERVPRO OF EAGAN/APPLE VALLEY
680.00 CARPET CLEANING 402290 4824067 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
680.00
404736 6/2/2016 135326 SHRED-IT USA
319.50 SHREDDING SERVICE 402625 9410667665 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
745.50 SHREDDING SERVICES 402179 9410755704 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE
1,065.00
404737 6/2/2016 120784 SIGN PRO
186.66 SIGNS 402626 10450 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
186.66
404738 6/2/2016 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
42.24 TIMECARD RACK 402627 13076992 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
42.24
404739 6/2/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC
95.14 QUICK COUPLER, SMARTKNIFE 00006496 402326 75592328 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
701.23 WHEEL, HERBICIDE, BACKPACK 402291 75717972 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 27
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account NO Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404739 6/2/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC Continued...
20.25 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001058 402292 75809756 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
109.55 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001063 402293 75834676 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
926.17
404740 6/2/2016 138444 SLEDGE, SHARAE
39.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 402652 053116 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE
39.96
404741 6/2/2016 132195 SMALL LOT MN
258.15 402233 7196 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
246.27 402674 7462 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
408.28 402365 7511 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
912.70
404742 6/2/2016 100629 SMITH, AMY
169.56 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 402628 052516 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION
169.56
404743 6/2/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL
18.78 SOCKET TRAY 00005355 402294 ARV/29002158 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18.78
404744 6/2/2016 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTERY
90.84 CLEAN CARPET STAIN 402423 1389C 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY
90.84
404745 6/2/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
256.00- 402676 0024479 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
52.00 402374 0024480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
520.00 402375 0024481 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
596.00 402234 1403807 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
139.00 402236 1409442 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
189.80 402544 1411213 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,364.80 402675 1411214 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
48.80 402545 1411215 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,418.46 402370 1411217 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
653.01 402373 1411218 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,898.32 402371 1411220 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
620.40 402372 1411222 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,318.27 402369 1411224 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page- 28
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 -
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404745 6/2/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued-.
243.20 402368 1411225 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING
2,012.06 402366 1411227 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
240.78 402367 1411228 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
857.50 402235 5015835 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
13,916.40
404746 6/2/2016 130640 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS INC.
909.50 ROOF ARCHITECTURE 402629 30901 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
909.50
404747 6/2/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
243.50 402547 10946 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
243.50 402376 10947 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
487.00
404748 6/2/2016 124631 STUART C. IRBY CO.
757.61 ARC FLASH SAFETY 00001971 402296 S009587200.001 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
193.30 ARC RAIN GEAR 00001971 402295 S009593415.001 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
950.91
404749 6/2/2016 134103 STULC, NATHAN
118.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 402653 053116 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING
118.80
404750 6/2/2016 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
292.46 TIRES 00005390 402425 10139451 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
292.46
404751 6/2/2016 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC.
681.05 FUNGICIDE 00006497 402327 12385 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
681.05
404752 6/2/2016 137673 SWEETLAND ORCHARD LLC
180.00 402546 853 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
180.00
404753 6/2/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA
517.82 CONCESSION PRODUCT 402630 605241202 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
517.82
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 — 6/2/2016
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 29
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404754 6/2/2016 106673 TAPCO Continued...
1,499.00 SPEED BUMPS 00001955 402426 1526505 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS
1,499.00
404755 6/2/2016 104932 TAYLOR MADE
556.94 GLOVES 402631 31573340 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
556.94
404756 6/2/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
1,775.20 402549 1086476 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
357.35 402548 1089028 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
176.05 402550 1089029 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
2,308.60
404757 6/2/2016 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC
458.50 402377 4257 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
458.50
404758 6/2/2016 138230 TITUS CONTRACTING LLC
3,080.00 REPAIR/PAINT SIDING 402328 4880 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
3,080.00
404759 6/2/2016 128347 TKO WINES INC.
216.00 402679 3011 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING
288.00 402677 3068 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING
240.00 402678 3502 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
744.00
404760 6/2/2016 101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING
9,580.00 PAINTING 402632 AQUATIC CENTER 5311.6532 PAINT POOL OPERATION
9,580.00
404761 6/2/2016 132108 TOLL, DEREK
93.59 TRAINING 402455 MEALS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
93.59
404762 6/2/2016 138420 TRAILER, ANGIE
80.00 SKYHAWKS - ETHAN 402329 PROGRAM REFUND 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARKADMIN. GENERAL
80.00
404763 6/2/2016 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL Page - 30
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 -
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No SubIedger Account Description Business Unit
404763 6/2/2016 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC Continued...
2,610.44 APPAREL 402633 3156673 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,610.44
404764 6/2/2016 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
165.50 SEED & FERTILIZER 402297 37521 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION
165.50
404765 6/2/2016 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
422.96 UNIFORMS 00003805 402330 28166-1 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
422.96
404766 6/2/2016 114236 USA BLUE BOOK
524.98 PRESSURE READERS 00001941 402298 947785 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES
524.98
404767 6/2/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO.
31.99 SOAP 402634 386722-01 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
285.35 LIQUOR BAGS 402180 387065-00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
317.34
404768 6/2/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.
650.00 WELDING PANEL 00001881 402299 1382011 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
650.00
404769 6/2/2016 102886 WAGNERS
634.65 FLOWERS 00002347 402181 6064 5765.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS PROMENADE EXPENSES
634.65
404770 6/2/2016 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN
72.30 402427 18780-2808 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION
101.15 402427 18780-2808 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
135.38 402427 18780-2808 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL
167.66 402427 18780-2808 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS
266.76 402427 18780-2808 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL
490.53 402427 18780-2808 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL
528.57 402427 18780-2808 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
528.57 402427 18780-2808 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING
657.50 402427 18780-2808 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL
71.08 402427 18780-2808 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
1.56 402427 18780-2808 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2/2016
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/31/2016 14:10:53
Page - 31
Business Unit
404770 6/2/2016 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN Continued...
168.36 402427 18780-2808 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
451.78 402427 18780-2808 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE
1,283.21 402427 18780-2808 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
1,336.95 402427 18780-2808 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
87.23 402427 18780-2808 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY
136.04 402427 18780-2808 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY
6,484.63
404771 6/2/2016 113961 WATSON
758.00 WAVE LIGHTS, HEATED PANEL 402300 8901 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
758.00
404772 6/2/2016 138446 WILDERMUTH, MITCHELL
24.79 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 402654 6300 CONCORD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
AVE
24.79
404773 6/2/2016 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C.
232.20 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 402655 053116 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING
232.20
404774 6/2/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
1.16- 402681 707950 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 50TH ST SELLING
241.16- 402682 707951 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,605.75 402557 7083135 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,222.98 402556 7083136 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING
3,586.41
404775 6/2/2016 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
7.83 HANDYBOX COVERS 00001902 402428 13124600 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
7.83
404776 612/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY
51.04 51-5276505-8 402182 501373719 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS
14.80 51-0010619811-5 402301 502283923 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
28.79 51-0223133-2 402476 502313315 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
17.61 51-0160483-1 402477 502313713 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS
51.10 51-4420190-3 402475 502374559 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL
1,102.33 51-5107681-4 402457 502383526 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
58.10 51-6541084-2 402478 502408929 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/31/2016 14:10:53
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 32
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/2/2016 -
Inv No
6/2/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404776 6/2/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued...
8,488.87 51-6644819-9 402458 502413970 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
99.84 51-6692497-0 402471 502416567 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE
144.32 51-5938955-6 402474 502424551 5937.6185 LIGHT & POWER INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR
1,015.60 51-9011854-4 402459 502441697 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION
83.42 51-9770164-7 402472 502451298 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
874.73 51-0010060454-7 402456 502458221 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM
92.13 51-0010166207-2 402468 502459866 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
23.62 51-0010118404-0 402469 502462830 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
41.06 51-0010103585-7 402470 502464625 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM
15.01 51-0010573502-3 402465 502467159 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
14.47 51-0010573385-0 402466 502475368 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
15.15 51-0010777228-2 402463 502477087 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
65.12 51-0010619455-3 402464 502480446 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
24.51 51-0010876028-0 402460 502485140 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
20.54 51-0010876012-2 402461 502489038 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
57.98 51-0010838463-7 402462 502491059 5936.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC
23.74 51-9770163-6 402473 502492657 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
18.24 51-0010573384-9 402467 502493371 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
28.53 51-8976004-9 402686 502617299 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
8,826.46 51-6955679-8 402685 502945944 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL
21,297.11
404777 6/2/2016 103226 YEADON FABRIC DOMES LLC
11,248.50 DOME TAKE DOWN 402635 30382 5552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION
11,248.50
404778 6/2/2016 132109 YOUNG, SEAN
63.35 K9 TRAINING 402656 MEALS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
63.35
404779 6/2/2016 101091 ZIEGLER INC
8.90 FREIGHT CHARGES 00005255 402302 PC001777491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
8.90
662,522.13 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Checks
A/P AC H Payment
Total Payments
552,860.44
109,661.69
662,522.13
5/31/2016 14:11:09
Page- 1
CITY OF EDINA R55C KS2 LOGIS1 00
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing andfor data selection. Council Check Summary
6/2/2016 - 6/2J2016
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 128,010.30
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 9,052.26
02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 154,160.44-
02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 78.00
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 80,530,14-
04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,600.74
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 57,634.89
05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,306.47
05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,506,66
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 14,071.41
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 31,846.86
05500 ICE ARENA FUND 53,465.35
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 13,370.52
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 15,438.07
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 9,556.09
05800 LIQUOR FUND 191,696.59
05900 UTILITY FUND 238,679.18
05930 STORM SEWER FUND 111,010.48
06000 RISK MGMT ISF 14,964.34
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 17.82
09232 CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 1,906.68
Report Totals 662,522.13
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing poi:id s and
proc dur date (0 (2-I I (0
\...i.. ...
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 1
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 -
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3216 6/9/2016 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
1,157.91 WELDMENT, OIL 00005261 402917 0147715-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
551.93 REPLACE DAMAMGED HOSE 402918 0147724-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,709.84
3217 6/9/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
75.20 402755 2006335 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
56.80 402754 2006340 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
32.00 403066 2007192 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
66.40 403185 2007195 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
230.40
3218 6/9/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
125.18 COFFEE 402689 8973669 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
125.18
3219 6/9/2016 100638 BACHMAN'S
49.95 FLOWERS 00006050 403111 819128/50 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
49.95
3220 6/9/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
154.10 403194 53680000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
1,529.40 402967 53779200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,317.55 403189 53830400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
898.60 403190 53850800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD NAME VERNON SELLING
898.60 403070 53850900 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
36.55 403071 53879900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
146.65 403193 53880000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
186.49 403188 53880100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
199.10 403191 53880200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
709.75 403069 53880300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
199.46 402815 93954700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
188,16 402968 93992100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
94.82 403072 94026900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
124.92 403192 94027000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
7,684.15
3221 6/9/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
26.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 402846 0E-421702-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
42.52 NAME BADGE KIT 402908 W0-203388-1 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION
331.70 FOLDERS, INDEX SYSTEM 402908 WO-203388-1 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 -- 6/9/2016
Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 2
Business Unit
3221 6/9/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued...
85.56 FILE POCKETS 403038 WO-204127-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING
486.76
3222 6/9/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
34.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 402928 119189 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
34.28
3223 6/9/2016 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
26.86 TURBO HOSE 00005265 402691 1060633 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
26.86
3224 6/9/2016 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC.
3,092.35 CLEANING SERVICES 403117 7070226074 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
3,092.35
3225 6/9/2016 104020 DALCO
749.08 TOWELS, TISSUE, WIPES 402931 3029149 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
749.08
3226 6/9/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.
668.50 PW OPEN HOUSE AD 402702 353079 1280.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
2,450.55 EDITION EDINA 403119 356346 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS
3,119.05
3227 6/9/2016 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC.
425.00 ROWAY 402936 2469800 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT
425.00
3228 6/9/2016 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE
129.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403204 060616 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
129.60
3229 6/9/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC
2,845.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00002583 402707 14444 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK
2,845.00
3230 6/9/2016 129508 IMPACT
500.04 MAY 2016 LATE NOTICES 402708 113937 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
500.04
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 3
Business Unit
3231 6/9/2016 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. Continued...
176.15 TRUCK UTILITY TANK 00001691 402709 993222 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
230.96 CHEMICAL FEED REPAIRS 00001085 403043 995784 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT
318.89 EYE WASH SYSTEM 00001043 403047 995785 5915.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT
726.00
3232 6/9/2016 132592 J.F. AHERN CO.
255.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 403137 144116 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM
255.00
3233 6/9/2016 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC.
141.50 TOILET RENTAL 402710 101703 1280.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
291.50 TOILET RENTAL 403044 101890 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL
433.00
3234 6/9/2016 101792 LUBE-TECH
110.00 USED OIL FILTERS PICKUP 402716 781221 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
690.21 OIL 00006044 403139 782744 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
800.21
3235 6/9/2016 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC.
1,785.00 SEASON PASS CARDS 403140 18752 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
1,785.00
3236 6/9/2016 101483 MENARDS
68.90 HOE, GREASE GUN COUPLERS 00006493 403141 12199 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17.45 SCREWS, FUNNELS 00006364 403142 13779 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
71.75 DUPLEX NAILS, CLEAR POLY 00001073 402948 14341 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION
73.21 HAND TRUCK 00002150 403143 14366 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
8.33 BALL VALVE, ELBOW 402719 14527 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
239.64
3237 6/9/2016 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
462.59 FILTERS 00006499 403144 1064681-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
403.55 IRRIGATION PARTS 403048 1067366-00 5765.6530 REPAIR PARTS PROMENADE EXPENSES
866.14
3238 6/9/2016 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY
206.50 STEEL TUBES 00005265 402953 349835 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
206.50
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 4
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 -- 6/9/2016
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
3239 6/9/2016 132364 OASIS GROUP, THE Continued...
658.75 EAP SERVICES - JUNE 2106 402723 3962 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
658.75
3240 6/9/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC.
562.00 TIRE REPAIRS 00005319 402955 210233854 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
562.00
3241 6/9/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
636.98 LINERS, WIPES, TOWELS 00002355 403051 10040 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
368.55 TISSUE, TOWELS, CLEANER 00002173 403148 10045 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ED1NBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
1,005.53
3242 6/9/2016 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC.
179.54 PLUMBING REPAIR PARTS 00001042 402739 S3260884.001 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
110.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00001009 403058 S3264085.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
57.14 PLUMBING PARTS 00001079 403059 S3264503.001 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE
347.65
3243 6/9/2016 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
548.30 VEHICLE REPAIRS 402960 698394 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
548.30
3244 619/2016 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS
2,182.92 LIQUID FERTILIZER 403152 9461-R 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
2,182.92
3245 6/9/2016 103277 TITAN MACHINERY
342.36 SOLENOID 00005307 402745 7716510 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
335.00- RETURN 402746 7778636 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
7.36
3246 6/9/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC
63.98- CREDIT 402750 EC05837 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
61.30 PROXIMITY SWITCH 00005306 402748 E195140 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
61.30 PROXIMITY SWITCH 00005391 402749 E195394 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
58.62
3247 6/9/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA
127.50 403028 0152718-1N 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
527.50 402811 0152719-1N 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 -- 6/9/2016
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 5
Business Unit
3247 6/9/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA Continued...
519.50 403104 0153250-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING
1,174.50
3248 6/9/2016 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION
27.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 403179 45604001 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
500.61 403180 45604002 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
404.35 403181 45671890 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
932.11
3249 6/9/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
96.00- 403031 426919-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
76.00- 403032 426954-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
424.25 403029 427295-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING
1,255.00 403030 427301-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
228.00 403105 427455-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
108.00 403201 427456-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING
1,843.25
404780 6/9/2016 100611 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
47.96 CHIPPING HAMMER 00006055 403108 108867 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
47.96
404781 6/9/2016 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC
111.65 FIRE HOSE 00001013 402687 1-874512 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
111.65
404782 6/9/2016 101949 ADDED TOUCH
2,200.00 PAINT POOL PADS 403109 EDINA POOL 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION
2,200.00
404783 6/9/2016 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS INC.
460.00 SCOREBOARD PARTS 00001598 402688 39392 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
460.00
404784 6/9/2016 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION
448.80 CO2 403110 32964860 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER
448.80
404785 6/9/2016 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
125.00 COFFEE 402843 116633 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 6
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 -
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404785
404786
6/9/2016 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
102840 AMERICAN EXPRESS
Continued...
6/9/2016
125.00
24.95 0-71009 OFFICE SUPPLIES 402844 052616 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION
24.95
404787 6/9/2016 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK
59.00 ON-LINE STUDY 402845 060116 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
175.50 CFE DUES 402845 060116 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
234.50
404788 6/9/2016 135988 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS
837.90 JUN 2016 ADMIN FEES 403165 12613 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
837.90
404789 6/9/2016 137556 ARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE
500.00 SOUTHDALE AREA PLAN - FINAL 403166 201615 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
500.00
404790 6/9/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
1,555.50 402757 3102370 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
299.00 402756 3102750 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
629.25 403067 3103623 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
1,090.50 403068 3103625 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
1,391.00 403187 3103626 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
89.00 403186 3103627 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
8.52- 402795 333919 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
5.16- 402794 347934 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
5,040.57
404791 6/9/2016 120995 AVR INC.
1,136.50 READYMIX CONCRETE 00001254 402919 127597 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION
1,512.50 402920 127716 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION
2,736.75 402921 128035 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION
2,707.50 402922 128136 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION
872.00 402923 128339 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION
563.25 READYMIX CONCRETE 402927 128398 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE
781.25 402924 128399 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION
1,623.00 402925 128790 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION
1,235.00 402926 128915 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 7
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 —
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404791 6/9/2016 120995 AVR INC. Continued...
13,167.75
404792 6/9/2016 100639 BAILEY NURSERIES
1,410.25 PLANTS 00002312 403036 INV0472651 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
1,410.25
404793 6/9/2016 136687 BALLANTINE PAINTING
18,560.00 RAMP PAINTING 403167 1006 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
18,560.00
404794 6/9/2016 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC.
6,733.14 BATTERIES 00006040 403112 35961STC 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS
432.00- CORE RETURNS 403113 36676STC 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS
6,301.14
404795 6/9/2016 127908 BAZZILLIONS, THE
200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/21/16 402902 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
200.00
404796 6/9/2016 102257 BEACHS AWARDS
642.85 NAMEPLATE PLAQUE 403114 HOLE IN ONE 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION
642.85
404797 6/9/2016 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC.
1,102.64 LAWN CARE 403037 146717 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY
1,102.64
404798 6/9/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.
144.00 PIZZA 403168 4635465 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
360.00 PIZZA 403115 4635466 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
504.00
404799 6/9/2016 125139 BERNICK'S
143.00 403169 298998 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
177.60 402969 300111 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
430.90 402970 300112 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
751.50
404800 6/9/2016 119153 BLACKBURN MFG. CO.
166.46 LOCATE FLAGS 00001045 402690 0515280-IN 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 8
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 -
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404800 6/9/2016 119153 BLACKBURN MFG. CO. Continued...
166.46
404801 6/9/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
3,114.50 402758 133669 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
1,071.66 402759 134114 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING
792.00 402971 134261 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING
2,649.50 403195 134267 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
7,627.66
404802 6/9/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
1,615.98 402980 1080476408 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
943.25 402981 1080476409 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
910.00 402798 1080476424 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,615.98 402973 1080476427 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,331.80 402972 1080476428 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
793.20 402797 1080476429 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,088.71 402984 1080479139 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
731.50 402983 1080479140 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
72.92 402982 1080479141 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
1,242.72 402979 1080479142 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
1,062.68 403074 1080479194 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,205.04 402977 1080479195 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
438.90 402976 1080479196 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING
670.75 402975 1080479197 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
462.15 402978 1080479198 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
5,162.13 402974 1080479199 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
235.15 403073 1080480344 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
225.15- 402800 2080102846 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
156.00- 402985 2080119190 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
266.30- 402799 2080119662 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
144.00- 402801 2080137536 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
19,791.41
404803 6/9/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC
71.40 402802 1090567585 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
7,388.95 402802 1090567585 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
3,040.00 403196 1090567586 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
1,853.20 402760 1090567587 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
5,240.70 402986 1090567588 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
416.00 402761 1090567589 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 9
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 --
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404803 6/9/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC Continued...
18,010.25
404804 6/9/2016 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.
513.97 AG-LIME 00001718 402692 14328 1642.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK FIELD MAINTENANCE
513.97
404805 6/9/2016 122074 BUIE, BARB
15.49 403182 060316 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
23.45 403182 060316 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
47.00 403182 060316 5760.6235 POSTAGE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
85.94
404806 6/9/2016 138462 CAGLEY, BILL
150.00 FARMER'S MARKET 6/30/16 402847 051316 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
150.00
404807 6/9/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
19.50 402803 00011185 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
923.70 402804 917565 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
2,369.98 403075 917566 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
3,313.18
404808 6/9/2016 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
19.25 8000014561-7 402851 052516 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
58.80 8000014561-7 402851 052516 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION
217.73 8000014561-7 402851 052516 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS
352.88 8000014561-7 402851 052516 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING
643.83 8000014561-7 402851 052516 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
386.39 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
53.28 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
464.19 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE
3,753.95 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
163.34 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
19.25 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
34.64 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY
62.82 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY
152.86 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION
187.24 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
843.70 8000014561-7 402851 052516 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS
7,414.15
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 10
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO #
6/9/2016 -
Doc No Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404808 6/9/2016
404809 6/9/2016
100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
Continued...
20.65 5584310-6 402694 5584310-5/16 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY
55.69 5590919-6 402693 5590919-5/16 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY
76.34
404810 6/9/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK
128.36 952 831-0024 402856 0024-5/16 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING
54.73 952 920-1565 402853 1565-5/16 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
59.06 952 920-1586 402854 1586-5/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
79.70 952 922-2444 402855 2444-5/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
134.79 952 920-9996 E911 402929 9996-5/16 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911
456.64
404811 6/9/2016 134994 CITY HOMES DESIGN & BUILD LLC
2,500.00 ED133385 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 402695 4613 TOWER ST 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS
2,500.00
404812 6/9/2016 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/20/16 402901 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
150.00
404813 6/9/2016 120433 COMCAST
6.94 8772 10 614 0177449 403116 177449-5/16 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE
6.94
404814 6/9/2016 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC.
360.00 PATCH MIX 00001006 402930 0140892-IN 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER
360.00
404815 6/9/2016 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES
155.00 T-SHIRTS 403170 47594 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENAADMINISTRATION
564.10 T-SHIRTS 403170 47594 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS
719.10
404816 6/9/2016 118063 DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
590.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEANUP 402857 16-08-03 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE
2,246.34 SUPPLIED GUM RUBBER COVERS 402858 16-08-04 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE
2,836.34
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 — 6/9/2016
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 11
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404817 6/9/2016 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC. Continued...
1,794.50 TOOLBOX, INVERTER 00005360 402696 4-207288 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,794.50
404818 6/9/2016 118189 DEM-CON COMPANIES
66.86 DUMPSTER DISPOSAL 402697 02-00691508 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
66.86
404819 6/9/2016 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
8,418.98 MAY 2016 SURCHARGE 403171 24926053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS
8,418.98
404820 6/9/2016 136484 DIEBEL, MIKE
288.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 403118 060116 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
288.00
404821 6/9/2016 118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC.
38.60 STEEL SHEET 00001910 402698 4090601 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
64.85 STEEL 00005267 402933 4102645 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
24.50 STEEL 00005267 402932 4102652 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6.13- CREDIT 402934 4102654 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
121.82
404822 6/9/2016 138427 DIXON, RALPHARD
52.00 OFFICIATING FEES 403160 060316 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
52.00
404823 6/9/2016 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC.
2,107.10 CHEMICALS 00005328 402700 827000600-16 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
1,486.25 CHEMICALS 00005328 402699 827000601-16 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
3,593.35
404824 6/9/2016 133193 DSM EXCAVATING INC.
2,500.00 ED142510 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 402701 5916 KELLOGG 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS
AVE
2,500.00
404825 6/9/2016 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES
910.00 5/8/16 RACE FOR THE CURE 402905 060216 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT
910.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 12
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 —
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404826 6/9/2016 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS Continued...
75.00 FOOTBALL PROG MAILING LABELS 402916 16973 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
75.00
404827 6/9/2016 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC.
107.50 TIF LEGISLATION 403172 70398 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT
4,000.00 2007A ARBITRAGE 402703 70511 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES
2,000.00 2015B ARBITRAGE 402859 70517 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
2,585.00 2015A ARBITRAGE 402860 70523 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES
8,692.50
404828 6/9/2016 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC.
165.87 403076 5737 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
165.87
404829 6/9/2016 117376 ESRI
3,700.00 GIS MAINTENANCE 00001007 402935 93133780 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
3,000.00 GIS MAINTENANCE 00001007 402935 93133780 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING)
10,000.00 GIS MAINTENANCE 00001007 402935 93133780 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING)
16,700.00
404830 6/9/2016 102497 EXPLORER POST 925
2,275.00 5/8/16 RACE FOR THE CURE 402906 060216 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT
2,275.00
404831 6/9/2016 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER
1,652.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 403120 060116 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
1,652.00
404832 6/9/2016 138219 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME
88.41 PERMIT REFUND 402861 ED146605 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS
88.41
404833 6/9/2016 134640 FROILAND, PAUL
51.30 PLANT HANGERS 403121 060316 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
51.30
404834 6/9/2016 100764 G & K SERVICES
15.00 ACCT 0012939 403122 1006708052 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
104.70 ACCT 0039263 403123 1013729276 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL
215.76 ACCT 0039263 403124 1013906754 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 13
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 -
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404834 6/9/2016 100764 G & K SERVICES Continued...
335.46
404835 6/9/2016 123080 GARDENVIEW GREENHOUSE
3,893.99 FLOWERS 00006042 403125 250250 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
3,893.99
404836 6/9/2016 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS
342.41 APPAREL 403126 11725184 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
342.41
404837 6/9/2016 132603 GOLFNOW G1 LLC
920.43 TERMINALS 403127 5100108606 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM
920.43 TERMINALS 403127 5100108606 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
2,761.27 TERMINALS 403127 5100108606 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
4,602.13
404838 6/9/2016 101103 GRAINGER
13.02 KNEE PADS 00005332 402704 9112669305 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
76.86 EAR PLUGS, REPELLENT 00005333 402939 9113266663 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE
76.86 EAR PLUGS, REPELLENT 00005333 402939 9113266663 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
76.86 EAR PLUGS, REPELLENT 00005333 402939 9113266663 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION
24.09 BATTERIES 00001047 402938 9114880769 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
28.96 ADHESIVE SPRAY 00005334 402705 9115179815 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
45.92 WELDING JACKET 00005361 402937 9121363957 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
135.74 HAND HELD SHOWERS 00002174 403128 9121746979 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
478.31
404839 6/9/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
408.75 402805 MN00005024 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
822.50 402987 MN00005116 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
422.75 403077 MN00005168 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,654.00
404840 6/9/2016 100785 GREUPNER, JOE
2,092.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 403129 060116 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
2,092.00
404841 6/9/2016 100008 GRUBE, MIKE
1,152.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 403130 060116 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
1,152.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 14
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/9/2016 —
Doc No Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404841 6/9/2016
404842 6/9/2016
100008 GRUBE, MIKE
101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO.
Continued...
2,109.00 AC REPAIR PARTS 00001960 403131 PLY0505837 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE
2,109.00
404843 6/9/2016 136272 HANNAN, ELIZABETH
220.00 CANCELED CLASS REFUND 403132 163662 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
220.00 CANCELED CLASS REFUND 403133 163663 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
440.00
404844 6/9/2016 136818 HAUGH, KARI BETH
54.00 MODEL 378153 071615 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
54.00
404845 6/9/2016 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
277.50 GATE VALVE RISER PARTS 00001049 402706 F545595 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
277.50
404846 6/9/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
6,317.57 ROOM & BOARD FEES 402862 1000077016 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES
6,317.57
404847 6/9/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
1,976.27 MAY 2016 BOOKING 403039 1000077326 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES
1,976.27
404848 6/9/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
1,170.54 RADIO ADMIN FEES 402940 1000076416 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
165.00 MAY 2016 BUNDLED SERVICE 403041 1000077276 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
165.00 MAY 2016 BUNDLED SERVICE 403040 1000077277 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,500.54
404849 6/9/2016 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG
345.45 OFFICE LIGHTING 00001818 403173 590852 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
345.45
404850 6/9/2016 138464 HODGES, ROBERT
218.40 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 403042 7402 OAKLAWN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
218.40
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 15
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404851 6/9/2016 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued...
435.00 402988 829319 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
2,173.50 403078 829711 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,608.50
404852 6/9/2016 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND CONCERT BAND
100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/19/16 402900 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
100.00
404853 6/9/2016 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
185.58 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 403136 160512012 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
3,386.60 CAL HYPO 403134 160516026 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION
376.50 MURIATIC ACID 403135 160517023 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION
3,948.68
404854 6/9/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY
498.10 402762 39918 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
2,564.14 403079 40115 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
3,062.24
404855 6/9/2016 104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC.
688.53 FIRE CODE BOOKS 00003807 403174 1000695794 1470.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
688.53
404856 6/9/2016 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE
79.59 402942 5/16-EQUIP 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
55.96 402942 5/16-EQUIP 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE
179.01 402941 5/16-FIRE 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
3.97 402910 5/16-POLICE 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
318.53
404857 6/9/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR 01ST. OF MINN
8.50- 402990 2487998 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
137.10 402763 2510918 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
137.10 402764 2510919 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,864.15 402765 2510929 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
6,771.90 403197 2510955 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
27.60 402989 2510956 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
49.20 403080 2510964 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
156.00 403081 2510965 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
10,134.55
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 16
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Account No
404857 6/9/2016 100741
404858 6/9/2016 100835
JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
Continued...
120.00 402768 5449194 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
2,666.20 402770 5450341 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
121.25 402769 5450343 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,216.75 402767 5450344 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
485.98 402766 5450345 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
4,783.81 403001 5450350 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
232.35 403002 5450359 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
679.46 403000 5450367 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
2,240.00 402999 5450724 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
2,464.00 402998 5450725 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
570.50 403085 5454801 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
9.04 403089 5454802 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
281.23 403088 5454804 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
260.12 402992 5454805 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
95.14 403087 5454807 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
3.48 403090 5454809 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,053.42 403086 5454810 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,625.07 403093 5454812 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,897.46 403084 5454813 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,160.88 403092 5454814 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
393.53 403083 5454815 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
4,723.43 403091 5454816 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
3,456.58 403094 5454817 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,927.38 403082 5454818 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,822.92 403095 5454819 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,168.85 402991 5454820 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
415.96 402996 5454821 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
3,224.61 402993 5454822 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
324.08 402997 5454823 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
4,615.50 402994 5454824 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
2,995.63 402995 5454825 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
356.64- 402777 557406 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
11.72- 402773 571599 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
8.96- 402772 571600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
125.26- 402774 571732 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
8.33- 402771 571733 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
31.16- 402775 572197 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
42.56- 402776 572453 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 17
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 —
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404858 6/9/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued...
10.75- 403003 574797 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
33.16- 403004 575704 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
49,406.07
404859 6/9/2016 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY
5.40 JURY DUTY MILEAGE 402863 060116 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
5.40
404860 6/9/2016 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE
348.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 403138 060116 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
348.00
404861 6/9/2016 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC.
376.32 ROCK 00001502 402711 252792 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION
376.32
404862 6/9/2016 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS
145.00 IMPOUND FEE 402866 72045 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE
170.00 IMPOUND FEE 402864 74311 2340,6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE
145.00 IMPOUND FEE 402865 75448 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE
460.00
404863 6/9/2016 138465 LAMBERT, BRIAN
120.00 403203 060316 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
120,00
404864 6/9/2016 100605 LANDS END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS
4,021.71 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 402712 3177603 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS
4,021.71
404865 6/9/2016 137011 LANDSCAPES UNLIMITED LLC
38,000.00 BRAEMAR PAR 3 CONSTRUCTION 403045 7 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
38,000.00
404866 6/9/2016 138109 LARSON COMPANIES
126.48 CARTRIDGES 00005215 402943 B-260960116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
126.48
404867 6/9/2016 133050 LARSON, CINDY
101.93 STEEL TOE WORK SHOES 402867 053116 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 18
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 —
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404867 6/9/2016 133050 LARSON, CINDY Continued...
101.93
404868 6/9/2016 136231 LARSON, DEB
700.00 MAY 2015 MARKETING SERVICES 402868 053116 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL
700.00 MAY 2015 MARKETING SERVICES 402868 053116 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
700.00 MAY 2015 MARKETING SERVICES 402868 053116 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
2,100.00
404869 6/9/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
114.55 HARDWARE 00005254 402715 9304104532 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
202.03 WASHERS, NUTS, SCREWS 00001059 402714 9304111072 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS
411.84 SCREWS, DRILL BITS 00005260 402713 9304112447 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
728.42
404870 6/9/2016 136275 LEMING, ANDY
52.50 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 402718 REIMBURSE 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
52.50
404871 6/9/2016 103396 LENT, WILLIAM
597.42 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING 402869 2016 EXPENSES 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
597.42
404872 6/9/2016 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC.
1,690.00 MILLING BITS 402944 12242 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
1,896.37 MILLING SUPPLIES 402945 12244 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
3,586.37
404873 6/9/2016 134612 MAJICA, SERGIO
150.00 FARMER'S MARKET 6/23/16 402871 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
150.00
404874 6/9/2016 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY
12,117.37 UNLEADED GAS 402717 443244 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6,410.04 DIESEL FUEL 402946 445466 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18,527.41
404875 6/9/2016 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC.
222.40 OXYGEN 00003649 402947 13431844 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
222.40
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 — 6/9/2016
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 19
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404876 6/9/2016 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS Continued...
2,443.25 MINNEAPOLIS RIVER CRUISE 403046 060116 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
2,443.25
404877 6/9/2016 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
2,460.15 MAY 2015 SAC 402949 060216 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS
2,460.15
404878 6/9/2016 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV
412,865.70 JULY 2016 SERVICE 402911 0001056506 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT
412,865.70
404879 6/9/2016 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE
426.53 VEHICLE REPAIRS 402720 284499 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
426.53
404880 6/9/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER
4,450.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002575 402950 35210 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK
4,250.00 WATER REPAIR 00002585 402951 35213 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A
1,781.25 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 00001019 402952 35214 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
10,481.25
404881 6/9/2016 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT
16,299.86 MAY 2016 WATER 403183 431-0005-5/16 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION
16,299.86
404882 6/9/2016 117837 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION
125.00 TRAVIS IVERSON 402870 TRAINING 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
125.00 NATHAN KADERLIK 402870 TRAINING 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
250.00
404883 6/9/2016 136224 MORRISSETTE, GREG
120.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 370472 6017 CODE AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
120.00
404884 6/9/2016 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM
208.00 OFFICIATING FEES 403162 060316 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
208.00
404885 6/9/2016 101658 MPELRA
250.00 SUMMER CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 402909 KAY MCALONEY 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 20
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc
6/9/2016 —
No Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404885 6/9/2016 101658 MPELRA Continued...
250.00
404886 6/9/2016 136354 NEW BRIGHTON FORD
27.00 HANDLE 00005503 402872 5132483 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
27.00
404887 6/9/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC.
77.13 STAFF SHIRTS 403145 987793805 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
77.13
404888 6/9/2016 127709 NORCOSTCO INC.
675.82 THEATER LIGHTS 403146 172378 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
675.82
404889 6/9/2016 124528 NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
3,600.00 FORCE ON FORCE INSTRUCTION 402721 SFT0000110578 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION
3,600.00
404890 6/9/2016 136562 NORTHLAND RECREATION LLC
2,090.00 WOOD FIBER FOR PLAYGROUND 00001076 402722 687 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE
2,090.00
404891 6/9/2016 134814 NUVEEN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
6,742.09 1ST QTR FEE 403049 149303 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES
6,742.09
404892 6/9/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
45.59 HOIST CABLE 00001065 402724 581318 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
45.59
404893 6/9/2016 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC.
6,415.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002579 402954 3906 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B
6,415.00
404894 6/9/2016 137829 PANOPTICON INVESTIGATIONS
150.00 TRAINING 402873 16-0014 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
150.00
404895 6/9/2016 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING
44.88 CATERED FOOD 403147 0621 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 21
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404895 6/912016 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING Continued...
44.88
404896 6/9/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
45.01- 403198 8541852-CM 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
70.00- 403007 8547733-CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
711.54 403006 8550035-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
775.65 403005 8550049-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,372.18
404897 6/9/2016 125492 PAYPAL INC.
39.95 UTILITY FEES 402912 50950092 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
39.95
404898 6/9/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
787.43 403175 47207673 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
1,155.31 403050 47207689 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
268.90 403008 47525871 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
2,211.64
404899 6/9/2016 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC.
275.00 EDITION EDINA DESIGN 402874 052416-7 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
275.00
404900 6/9/2016 100950 PETTY CASH
4.00 402913 060116 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING
6.00 402913 060116 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING
6.25 402913 060116 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
6.44 402913 060116 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
6.96 402913 060116 1132.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE COMMISSION
7.78 402913 060116 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES
11.00 402913 060116 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS
13.63 402913 060116 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE
14.00 402913 060116 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH
15.88 402913 060116 1495.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE INSPECTIONS
20.00 402913 060116 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
20.00 402913 060116 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
20.00 402913 060116 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
20.70 402913 060116 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
26.97 402913 060116 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
27.96 402913 060116 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 22
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 -
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404900 6/9/2016 100950 PETTY CASH Continued...
36.00 402913 060116 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
100.45 402913 060116 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING
120.00 402913 060116 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS
18.94 402913 060116 01420.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B
9.13 402913 060116 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
19.92 402913 060116 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
52.71 402913 060116 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
82.00 402913 060116 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
155.10 402913 060116 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
821.82
404901 6/9/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
52.60- 402784 234047 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
3.48- 402810 235285 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING
11.30- 402809 235286 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
12.00- 402783 235291 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
7.33- 402782 235292 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
13.35- 402808 235352 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
4.20- 402807 235851 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2.10- 402806 236046 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
89.16- 402781 236786 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
233,16- 402780 236831 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
108.27 402779 2982668 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
296.46 402778 2982669 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
3.48 403009 2982670 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,770.25 403010 2982676 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
261.32 403100 2985540 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
389.72 403098 2985541 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,173.43 403099 2985544 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
322.44 403096 2985545 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
511.13 403097 2985546 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
887.32 403012 2985547 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
303.74 403011 2985548 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
833.97 403013 2985549 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
6,432.85
404902 6/9/2016 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS
691.91 POSTERS 402875 060116 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP
691.91
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 -- 6/9/2016
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 23
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404903 6/9/2016 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE CO. Continued...
150.00 WOODCHIPPER RENTAL 00001826 402725 5646 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
150.00
404904 6/9/2016 124537 RALPH, ROBERT
416.00 OFFICIATING FEES 403163 060316 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
416.00
404905 6/9/2016 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC.
780.00 CRS2 OIL 402956 5475 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION
780.00
404906 6/9/2016 138459 RECKER, RICHARD
79.00 COURSE FEE CANCELATION 402726 REFUND 7414.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PUBLIC PROGRAMS
79.00
404907 6/9/2016 100981 ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORP.
2,808.02 RESTROOM SANITATION 403149 1265147 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
2,808.02
404908 6/9/2016 101311 ROOT-O-MATIC SEWER SERVICE
285.00 CLEANOUT- ROSLAND PARK 403052 39113 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
165.00 AUGER WORK - NORMANDALE PK 403053 39114 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
450.00
404909 6/9/2016 134173 SAFE-FAST INC.
55.50 SAFETY VESTS 00005321 402957 INV168493 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
60.00 SAFETY VESTS 00005321 402957 INV168493 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
400.00 SAFETY VESTS 00005321 402957 INV168493 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE
300.00 SAFETY VESTS 00005321 402957 INV168493 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION
815.50
404910 6/9/2016 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT
104.00 OFFICIATING FEES 403164 060316 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
104.00
404911 6/9/2016 100349 SCOTT COUNTY
290.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 402907 060216 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
290.00
404912 6/9/2016 100349 SCOTT COUNTY
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 24
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 -
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404912 6/9/2016 100349 SCOTT COUNTY Continued...
385.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 402958 060316 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
385.00
404913 6/9/2016 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL
150.00 CONFERENCE FEE 402876 060116 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
150.00
404914 6/9/2016 103249 SHANNON, JIM
150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/21/2016 402903 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
150.00
404915 6/9/2016 135326 SHRED-IT USA
415.35 SHREDDING SERVICES 402959 9410820407 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
415.35
404916 6/9/2016 120784 SIGN PRO
13.16 SIGN 00001856 402727 10438 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
60.00 LIQUOR STORE SIGNS 402877 10473 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING
60.00 LIQUOR STORE SIGNS 402877 10473 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING
60.00 LIQUOR STORE SIGNS 402877 10473 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING
193.16
404917 6/9/2016 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS
356.29 CLOTHING 402878 756523 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION
356.29
404918 6/9/2016 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC.
48.32 HOT DOG BUNS 403176 286260 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
48.32
404919 6/9/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC
208.10 WEED KILLER 00005152 402728 75270841 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE
133.62 WEED KILLER 00005155 402729 75322491 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE
189.15 WEED KILLER 00005323 402730 75571886 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE
125.92 WEED KILLER 00005359 402731 75702982 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
597.58 SPREADER 00006364 403150 75715055 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
49.30 HOSE END 00006043 403151 75902107 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
126.46 ROUNDUP 00001069 402732 75908654 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
205.77 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001071 402733 75917755 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
2.45- CREDIT 00001017 403054 75927131 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 25
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404919 6/9/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC Continued...
245 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001071 402734 75959081 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
19.60 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001071 402735 75959163 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
1,655.50
404920 6/9/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL
242.99 TIRE TOOL 00005355 402737 ARV/29024045 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
19.58 TIRE TOOL 00005355 402736 ARV/29050122 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
262.57
404921 6/9/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
2,379.20 402785 1411216 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,746.45 403022 1411219 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,424.00 403017 1411226 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
.80 402786 1412585 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,355.60 402787 1412586 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,231.60 402788 1412587 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
411.60 403102 1413254 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
538.02 403101 1413256 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
635.20 403025 1413258 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
3,398.60 403021 1413259 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
6,145.46 403024 1413260 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
126.80 403023 1413261 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,619.20 403026 1413262 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,395.60 403015 1413263 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
3,384.90 403018 1413264 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
748.80 403019 1413265 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,157.60 403020 1413266 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
868.02 403016 1413267 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
1,459.00 403014 5015952 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
101.81- 403027 PICKUP0024604 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
31,924.64
404922 6/9/2016 129891 SPACK CONSULTING
8,240.00 TRAFFIC STUDY 402738 4234 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES
8,240.00
404923 6/9/2016 100181 SPEEDY KEYS
320.00 RECODE LOCKS ON NEW VEHICLE 403055 160978 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
320.00 403056 160979 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
320.00 403057 160980 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 26
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 — 6/9/2016
Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404923 6/9/2016 100181 SPEEDY KEYS Continued...
960.00
404924 6/9/2016 103658 ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND
75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/22/16 402904 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
75.00
404925 6/9/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
126.00 402789 10948 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
126.00
404926 6/9/2016 138460 STEPHEN LONGMAN BUILDERS INC.
2,500.00 ED146433 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 402740 5113 GORGAS AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS
2,500.00
404927 6/9/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA
284.06 CLEANING SUPPLIES 403154 605271378 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
1,892.32 CONCESSION PRODUCT 403154 605271378 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS
367.81 CONCESSION PRODUCT 403153 606011127 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
2,544.19
404928 6/9/2016 137993 TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
178.00 HEADSETS 402879 0008645 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911
178.00
404929 6/9/2016 138281 TARRAF CONSTRUCTION INC.
22,211.00 SO METRO TRAINING ADDITION 403060 2 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY
22,211.00
404930 6/9/2016 113549 TENNIS WEST
600.00 PRESSURE WASH COURTS 402741 HIGHLANDS PARK 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE
600.00
404931 6/9/2016 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
27.36 POWER RELAY 00005311 402742 23109-00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
27.36
404932 6/9/2016 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE
235.79 CHEMICALS 00001833 402743 S233974-IN 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE
235.79
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 27
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404933 6/9/2016 121253 THAYER, LARRY Continued..
11340 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 402744 052416 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING
113.40
404934 6/9/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
3,281.15 403199 1089984 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
39.00 403200 1093172 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
3,320.15
404935 6/9/2016 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA
330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 402881 2016-154283 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 402881 2016-154283 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
330.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 402881 2016-154283 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
300.00 ARNESON ACRES AD 402880 2016-164091 1600.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
1,290.00
404936 6/9/2016 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC
210.00 403103 4311 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
210.00
404937 6/9/2016 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
4,625.26 VVELDER 00005356 402747 10136039 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
57.10 TIPS, NOZZLES 00005264 402961 10137395 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4,682.36
404938 6/9/2016 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE
117.75 MAY 2016 USAGE 402914 269634-6/16 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
117.75
404939 6/9/2016 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT
190.00 HYDRO RENTAL 00001020 402962 R24326 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE
300.00 HYDRO RENTAL 00001020 402962 R24326 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
500.00 HYDRO RENTAL 00001020 402962 R24326 5913.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL DISTRIBUTION
990.00
404940 6/9/2016 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC
151.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 403177 T115812115 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
151.00
404941 6/9/2016 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
80.00 GRASS SEED MIX 00005320 402964 37260 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 28
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404941 6/9/2016 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Continued...
72.50 SEED FOR HYDRO 402963 37538 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE
200.00 SEED FOR HYDRO 402963 37538 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
500.00 SEED FOR HYDRO 402963 37538 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION
79.90 FERTILIZER 00001982 403061 37597 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE
932.40
404942 6/9/2016 103973 ULINE
356.16 NITRILE GLOVES 00001081 403062 77293295 5921.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
356.16
404943 6/9/2016 136966 UNIVERSAL WINDOWS DIRECT
134.24 PERMIT REFUND 380626 424 HARRISON 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS
AVE
134.24
404944 6/9/2016 100050 USPS
6,000.00 ACCT # 03620836 403178 060316 1120.6235 POSTAGE ADMINISTRATION
6,000.00
404945 6/9/2016 119479 VALLEY VIEW GLASS & SCREEN
170.46 TEMPERED GLASS 402965 POLICE DISPATCH 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
170.46
404946 6/9/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO.
64.23 TISSUE, PAPER PLATES 402751 387066-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
568.33 LIQUOR BAGS 402751 387066-00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
195.92 CAN LINERS 00001064 403063 388232-00 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL
32.18- CREDIT 402966 388834CM 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
796.30
404947 6/9/2016 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
13.46 BOLT, WASHER 00006489 403155 513160002 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS
40.38 SHIELD 00006040 403156 523160003 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS
1,110.45 CHARGERS 403157 526160009 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS
1,164.29
404948 6/9/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.
62.29 ELECTRIC CORD 00005310 402752 1425377 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
62.29
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2016 14:41:57
Page - 29
Business Unit
404949 6/9/2016 136341 WARD, SAMUEL Continued...
45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 372317 051215 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION
45.00
404950 6/9/2016 138461 WILEY LAW OFFICE PC, THE
560.00 LEADERSHIP TRAINING 402753 20274 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
560.00
404951 6/9/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
267.55- 402793 707386 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
345.16- 402792 707558 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
201.16- 402791 707840 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
44.00- 402814 708059 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
309.48- 403035 708098 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
3,169.78 402813 7082130 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
5,364.33 403034 7083132 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,837.35 402790 7083133 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
330.75 402812 7083406 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
386.32 403033 7083923 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,246.12 403107 7083925 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
62.73 403106 7083926 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
11,230.03
404952 6/9/2016 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC
2,852.01 DACONIL, HERITAGE 00006048 403158 7884487 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
2,852.01
404953 6/9/2016 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
73.71 NUTS, BOLTS 00001041 403159 13190400 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
73.71
404954 6/9/2016 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
6,553.50 TRAFFIC STUDY 402915 2-01686-710 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES
6,553.50
404955 6/9/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY
43.70 51-0193479-4 402885 502500344 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT
2,868.94 51-4159265-8 402882 502588134 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY
1,587.35 51-5547446-1 402897 502595445 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS
164.25 51-8987646-8 402887 502618068 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
7,638.01 51-9603061-0 402898 502623204 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:41:57
Council Check Register by GL Page - 30
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/9/2016 —
Inv No
6/9/2016
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
404955 6/9/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued...
23.72 51-0010504853-2 402896 502642206 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
200.74 51-9608462-5 402886 502642957 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
16.93 51-0010619788-5 402895 502646356 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
16.93 51-0010619810-4 402894 502646720 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
13.46 51-0010876027-9 402893 502657956 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
30,090.33 51-4621797-2 402883 502742137 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
1,126.72 51-4827232-6 402890 502744347 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION
1,076.79 51-9251919-0 402888 502796699 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES
34.25 51-8102668-0 402889 502832464 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
834.54 51-5634814-2 402884 502922751 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT
310.62 51-6046826-0 402892 502927744 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
471.12 51-6229265-9 402899 502931420 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION
1,720.12 51-6229265-9 402899 502931420 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
171.17 51-9337452-8 402891 502972931 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
26,817.89 51-4888627-1 403184 503265216 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
2,615.05 51-4888627-1 403184 503265216 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
77,842.63
404956 6/9/2016 104324 YOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO.
118.98 MAPLE LAMINATE 00001726 403064 768311 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
8.58- TAX CREDIT ON 768311 00001726 403065 769007 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
110.40
1,044,122.31 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Checks
NP ACH Payment
Total Payments
1,008,282.29
35,840.02
1,044,122.31
nage
R55CKS2 LOGIS100
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2016 14:42:10
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1
6/9/2016 - 6/9/2016
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 155,385.90
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 772.79
03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 6,585.00
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 33,359.27
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 960.00
05100 ART CENTER FUND 440.39
05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,175.43
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 11,698.22
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 78,274.24
05500 ICE ARENA FUND 33,345.80
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 2,615.05
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 2,138.38
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,916.29
05800 LIQUOR FUND 191,666.27
05900 UTILITY FUND 466,102.86
05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,238.24
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 33,280.68
09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 19,060.00
09238 SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 107.50
Report Totals 1,044,122.31
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing polici,s pnd
7 pedur ate (el / //
ceb/ ired
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.C.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator
Item Activity:
Subject:Heritage Preservation Board Appointment Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Appoint Scott Loving to the Heritage Preservation Board in a partial term ending 3/1/19.
INTRODUCTION:
Effective June 15, 2016, Ryan Weber resigned as a member of the Heritage Preservation Board due to moving
out of of the City of Edina. Scott Loving was selected as the 2016 Heritage Preservation Board alternate in the
case of an unscheduled opening.
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.D.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Dave Nelson, Chief of Police
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No. 2016-62 Approving Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Between Homeland Security
and Edina Police Department
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2016-061 approving Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Homeland
Security Investigations and the Edina Police Department.
INTRODUCTION:
The MOU will allow the Edina Police Department to participate in joint investigations with Homeland Security
Investigations and provides for reimbursement of costs incurred by the Edina Police Department in providing
resources to joint operations/task forces.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution Approving MOU Homeland Security
MOU Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-62
RESOLUTION APPROVING HOMELAND SECURITY JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY
OF EDINA ON BEHALF OF ITS POLICE DEPARTMENT REGARDING REIMBURSEMENT OF JOINT
OPERATIONS EXPENSES FROM THE TREASURY FORFEITURE FUND
WHEREAS, the City of Edina on behalf of its Police Department desires to enter into Joint
Powers Agreements with Homeland Security for the purpose of the reimbursement of costs
incurred by the Edina Police Department in providing resources to joint operations/task
forces.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. This Agreement becomes effective the date it is signed by both parties. It remains in
force unless explicitly terminated, in writing, by either party.
2. This Agreement is established pursuant to the provisions of 31 USC 9703, the Treasury
Forfeiture Fund Act of 1992, which provides for the reimbursement of certain expenses
incurred by local, county, and state law enforcement agencies as participants of joint
operations/task forces with a federal agency participating in the Treasury Forfeiture fund.
3. This Agreement establishes the responsibility of both parties and the procedures for the
reimbursement of certain overtime expenses and other law enforcement expenses
pursuant to 31 USC 9703.
4. This Agreement is valid for all joint investigations led by the HIS St. Paul office with the
participation of the Edina Police Department, and until terminated, in writing, by either
party.
5. That James B. Hovland, Mayor and Scott H. Neal, City Manager for the City of Edina are
authorized to sign the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements.
Passed and Adopted by the Council on this 21st day of June 2016.
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June
21, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________.
City Clerk
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN
HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS AND LOCAL,
COUNTY, OR STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FOR THE
REIMBURSEMENT OF JOINT OPERATIONS EXPENSES FROM
THE TREASURY FORFEITURE FUND
This Agreement is entered into by the Edina, Minnesota Police Department, 4801 West
50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-1394 (NCIC CODE (AGENCY NCIC CODE)) and
Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) St. Paul office for the purpose of the
reimbursement of costs incurred by the Edina Police Department in providing resources
to joint operations/task forces.
Payments may be made to the extent they are included in the HSI Fiscal Year Plan, and
the money is available within the Treasury Forfeiture Fund to satisfy the request(s) for
the reimbursement of overtime expenses and other law enforcement expenses related to
joint operations.
I. LIFE OF THIS AGREEMENT
This Agreement becomes effective on the date it is signed by both parties. It remains
in force unless explicitly terminated, in writing, by either party.
II. AUTHORITY
This Agreement is established pursuant to the provisions of 31 USC 9703, the
Treasury Forfeiture Fund Act of 1992, which provides for the reimbursement of
certain expenses incurred by local, county, and state law enforcement agencies as
participants of joint operations/task forces with a federal agency participating in the
Treasury Forfeiture Fund.
III. PURPOSE OF THIS AGREEMENT
This Agreement establishes the responsibilities of both parties and the procedures for
the reimbursement of certain overtime expenses and other law enforcement expenses
pursuant to 31 USC 9703.
IV. APPLICABILITY OF THIS AGREEMENT
This agreement is valid for all joint investigations led by the HSI St. Paul office with
the participation of the Edina Police Department, and until terminated, in writing, by
either party.
-2-
V. TERMS, CONDITIONS, AND PROCEDURES
A. Assignment of Officer(s)
To the maximum extent possible, the Edina Police Department shall
assign dedicated officers to any investigation or joint operation.
Included as part of this Agreement, the Edina Police Department shall
provide the HSI St. Paul office with the names, titles, four last digits of
SSNs, badge or ID numbers, and hourly overtime wages of the officer(s)
assigned to the joint operation. This information must be updated as
necessary.
B. Submission of Requests for Reimbursement (Invoices) and
Supporting Documentation
1. The Edina Police Department may request the reimbursement of
overtime salary expenses directly related to work on a joint operation
with the HSI St. Paul office performed by its officer(s) assigned to this
joint operation. In addition, the Edina Police Department may request
reimbursement of other investigative expenses, such as travel, fuel,
training, equipment and other similar costs, incurred by officer(s)
assigned as members of the designated joint operations with the HSI
St. Paul office.
The Edina Police Department may not request the reimbursement of
the same expenses from any other Federal law enforcement agencies
that may also be participating in the investigation.
2. Reimbursement payments will not be made by check. To receive
reimbursement payments, the Edina Police Department must ensure
that Customs and Border Protection, National Finance Center
(CBP/NFC) has a current ACH Form on file with the agency’s bank
account information, for the purposes of Electronic Funds Transfer.
The ACH Form must be sent to the following address:
CBP National Finance Center
Attn: Forfeiture Fund
6026 LAKESIDE BLVD.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46278
If any changes occur in the law enforcement agency’s bank account
information, a new ACH Form must be filled out and sent to the
CBP/NFC as soon as possible.
-3-
3. In order to receive the reimbursement of officers’ overtime and other
expenses related to joint operations, the Edina Police Department must
submit to the HSI St. Paul office the TEOAF Form “Local, County,
and State Law Enforcement Agency Request for Reimbursement of
Joint Operations Expenses (Invoice)”, signed by an authorized
representative of that agency and accompanied by supporting
documents such as copies of time sheets and receipts.
4. The Edina Police Department remains fully responsible, as the
employer of the officer(s) assigned to the investigation, for the
payment of overtime salaries and related benefits such as tax
withholdings, insurance coverage, and all other requirements under the
law, regulation, ordinance, or contract, regardless of the reimbursable
overtime charges incurred. Treasury Forfeiture Fund reimburses
overtime salaries. Benefits are not reimbursable.
5. The maximum reimbursement entitlement for overtime worked on
behalf of the joint investigation is set at $15,000 per officer per year.
6. The Edina Police Department will submit all requests for the
reimbursement of joint operations’ expenses to the HSI St. Paul office
at the following address: 1 Federal Drive, Suite 1340, Ft. Snelling,
MN, 55111 Attn: Group Supervisor Christopher Oelkers, telephone
number: 612-843-8843.
VI. PROGRAM AUDIT
This Agreement and its provisions are subject to audit by HSI, the Department
of the Treasury Office of Inspector General, the General Accounting Office,
and other government designated auditors. The Edina Police Department
agrees to permit such audits and agrees to maintain all records relating to
these transactions for a period not less than three years; and in the event of an
on-going audit, until the audit is completed.
These audits may include reviews of any and all records, documents, reports,
accounts, invoices, receipts of expenditures related to this agreement, as well
as interviews of any and all personnel involved in these transactions.
VII. REVISIONS
The terms of this Agreement may be amended upon the written approval by
both parties. The revision becomes effective on the date of approval.
-4-
VIII. NO PRIVATE RIGHT CREATED
This is an internal government agreement between HSI St. Paul and the Edina
Police Department and is not intended to confer any right or benefit to any
private person or party.
Signatures:
____________________ __________________
Jae A. Khu Dave Nelson
Acting Special Agent in Charge Chief of Police
Homeland Security Investigations Edina Police Department
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Date: ________________ Date: ________________
________________________ _____________________
James Hovland Scott Neal
Mayor City Manager
City of Edina City of Edina
Date: ___________________ Date: ________________
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.E.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Dave Nelson, Chief of Police
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No. 2016-64 Approving Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) Between Internet Crimes
Against Children (ICAC) Task Force and Edina Police
Department
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2016-64 approving Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Internet
Crimes Against Children (ICAC) Task Force and the Edina Police Department.
INTRODUCTION:
The proposed agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Internet Crimes Against
Children (ICAC) Task Force allows Edina Police Department to participate in the joint investigations and
prosecution of crimes committed against children.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution No. 2016-64
Joint Powers Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-64
RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF
EDINA ON BEHALF OF ITS POLICE DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE MINNESOTA INTERNET CRIMES
AGAINST CHILDREN TASK FORCE (ICAC)
WHEREAS, the City of Edina on behalf of its Police Department desires to enter into Joint
Powers Agreements with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Bureau of
Criminal Apprehension to utilize applicable state and federal laws to investigate and
prosecute crimes committed against children and the criminal exploitation on children that is
committed and/or facilitated by or through the use of computers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements by and between the State of
Minnesota acting through its Department of Public Safety, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension
and the City of Edina on behalf of its Police Department, are hereby approved. A Copy of
the Joint Powers Agreement is attached to this Resolution and made a part of it.
2. That Detective Kenna Dick or her successor, is designated the Authorized Representative
for the Police Department. The Authorized Representative is also authorized to sign any
subsequent amendment or agreement that may be required by the State of Minnesota to
maintain the City’s connection to the systems and tools offered by the State.
3. That James B. Hovland, Mayor and Scott H. Neal, City Manager for the City of Edina are
authorized to sign the State of Minnesota Joint Powers Agreements.
Passed and Adopted by the Council on this 21st day of June 2016.
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting of June 21, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________,
____________.
City Clerk
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.F.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No. 2016-65 Appointing Election Judges
For August 9, 2016
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion adopting Resolution No. 2016-65
INTRODUCTION:
To comply with Minnesota Election law the Council must appoint Election Judges at least 25 days before each
election.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Staff Report Primary Election Judges
Res, No. 2016-65 Appointing Election Judges
Exhibit A to Res. 2016-65
June 21, 2016
Mayor and City Council
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2016-65 Appointing Primary Election Judges
Information / Background:
Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that the governing body of the municipality appoint
election judges to administer the polling places at least 25 days before each election. The
Primary Election will be held August 9, 2016 with Absentee Balloting opening June 24, 2016.
The attached Resolution 2016-65 lists the persons intended to serve Election Judges and
Absentee Judges in alphabetical order. We will be placing five to six persons in each polling
location at the Primary, plus running an Absentee Ballot Board. In addition, we will train
alternates to substitute in case others cannot serve. When assigning the judges to a precinct
we will maintain the party balance in each precinct and on our absentee board as required by
statutes.
In addition, Hennepin County will be acting on behalf of the City of Edina as a part of our
Absentee Ballot Board so they are named in our appointing resolution.
I also ask for the authority to replace or substitute judges as necessary before Election Day.
Attachment:
Resolution No. 2016-65
RESOLUTION NO 2016-65
APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES
FOR THE AUGUST 9, 2016 PRIMARY
WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as election
judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on
file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as the City of Edina Primary Election Judges for
the August 9, 2016 Primary Election; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Edina City Council also appoints other individuals and all
members appointed to the Hennepin County Absentee Ballot Board as authorized under Minn.
Stat. 204B.21, subd. 2 under the direction of the Election Manager to serve as members of the
Edina Absentee Ballot Board; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any
substitutions or additions as deemed necessary.
Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 21st day of June 2016.
Attest
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina
City Council at its regular meeting of June 21, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular
meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ______________, 20_______.
_______________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Exhibit A
2016 Primary Election
Election Judges
Page 1 of 2
Mindy Ahler
Valerie Anderson
Julie Arnott
Blyth Bailey
Annie Baldwin
Mary Balogh
Lisa Batdorf
Michael Beers
Sheryl Bertrand
Lisa Bjerken
Thomas Bodin
Juliet Boemer
Janice Bolin
Joyce Borealino
Katherine Bradbury
Adele Brellenthin
David Briscoe
Sheryl Cain
Robert Calgren
Christine Campion
Keith Carlson
Constance Carrino
Cathy Cella
Marilyn Christiansen
Judy Cipolla
Roberta Cole
Jack Cracraft
Marian Cracraft
Colleen Crew
Deborah Croker
Judie Dale
Sandra Dallmann
Gloria DeBerg
Amy Demarest
Patricia Dill
Lisa Domke
Mary Donahue
Wendy Donovan
Lynn Duane
Sontrud Duke
Kim Dulas
Erika Eberlein
Cynthia Edwards
Don Eidam
Jeanene Engebretson
Elizabeth Feinberg
Laurie Fetterman
Paul Fink
Lisa Flint
John Fossum
Pamela Friedman
Suzanne Fuluvaka
Valerie Geurts
Devorah Goldstein
Ruth Gough
George Griffiths
Dolores Gutierrez
Patti Hankes
Brian Hansen
Shawn Hartfeldt
Mary Hartupee
Buddy Hasnudeen
Lisa Hatzung
Corrine Heine
Cheryl Heley
James Higgins
Alan Holst
Therese Hurley
Myra Hykes
Cecilia Jaisle
Suzanne Jiwani
Grant Johnson
Ann R Kapaun
Patricia Karasov
Dalia Katz
Joan Keiner
Louise Kellams
Sharon Kiker
Mavis Klefsaas
Marcia Koester
Janet Kopp
Julia Kosters
Keith Kostuch
Martha Kouatli
Hana Koudsi
Mary Kvanbeck
Judy Labonne
Gertrude Lappin
Delores Lazaretti
Karen Leon
Susan Lindsay
Mitzi Litman
Uday Lohani
Cynthia Loveland
Exhibit A
2016 Primary Election
Election Judges
Page 2 of 2
William Lucas
Linda Maetzold
Robert Mallon
Maria Malooly
Mary Martenis
Donna McCormick
Susan McKusick
Marvin Menzel
Nancy Miller
Pat Montez
Jon Moon
Cooper Morrow
Peggy Mullick
David Nelson
James Nelson
Susan Niefeld
Daniel Nye
Donald Nygaard
Katherine Oberle
Patti Olander
Ordell O'Neill
Wain Pearce
Heather Petermann
Ronald Pfannenstein
Karen Powell
Teresa Razidlo
Karen Reed
Eric Rehm
Julie Risser
Jennifer Roach
Judith Rodgers
William Rodgers
Luann Rosenthal-Erickson
Carol Rothe
William Rush
Milagros Rush
Randy Sawatzky
Connie Schramm
Aundria Schreiner
Nancy Schwappach
Sara Schwiebert
Marty Sedoff
Floy Sims
Mary Skoy
Ruth Smith
Del Smith
Judy Smith
Cathy Snyder
Mary Ann Stanton
Vivian Steblay
Jan Stone
Dolores Sundem
Roger Sweet
Gail Sweet
Patricia Sykes
Andrea Tiggas
Janet Ulvin
Susan Waack
Louann Waddick
Donna Wallander
Mary Watson
Paul Wehrmeister
Mary Jean Weigel
Mike Welbaum
Wayne Wenger
Ardis Wexler
Kelly Wheaton
Rochelle Williams
Jane Wilson
Kitty Winn
Katharine Winston
Linda Wood
Romelle Woodhall
Mary Yee
Scott Zimmerman
Margaret Zverinova
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.G.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator
Item Activity:
Subject:Minnesota Department of Health Master Grant
Contract Amendment
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Amendment to Master Grant Contract with the Minnesota Department of Health, to comply with
Federal Requirements.
INTRODUCTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Master Grant Contract Amendment
Amendment # 1 for 2015-2019 Master Grant Contract
Between the Minnesota Department of Health and
City of Edina Community Health Board
Minnesota Department of Health
Community Health Board Master Grant Contract Amendment
Master Grant Contract Number: 12-700-00078
Master Grant Contract Start Date: 1/1/2015
Master Grant Contract Amendment Start Date 7/1/2016
Master Grant Contract Expiration Date: 12/31/2019
This Master Grant Contract Amendment is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of
the Minnesota Department of Health (hereinafter “State”) and City of Edina Community Health Board, 4801 W
50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 (hereinafter “Grantee”).
Recitals
1.The State has a Master Grant Contract with the Grantee to streamline the grant project agreements for
individual grant projects by incorporating by reference the provisions of the Master Grant Contract.
2.The Master Grant Contract is being amended to assure compliance with federal (Uniform Guidance, or 2
CFR 200) requirements.
3.The State and the Grantee are willing to amend the Original Master Grant Contract as stated below.
Master Grant Contract Amendment
Amended or deleted Master Grant Contract terms will be struck out, and the added Master Grant Contracts
terms will be underlined.
REVISION 1. Clause 14B. Audit Requirement is amended as follows:
B.Audit Requirements
1.If the GRANTEE expends total federal assistance of $500,000 or more per year, the GRANTEE
agrees to (1) obtain either a single audit or a program-specific audit made for the fiscal year in
accordance with the terms of the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter 75)
and OMB Circular A-133; and (2) to comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended (31 U.S.
Code Chapter 75) and OMB Circular A-133.
2.The audit shall be made by an independent auditor. An independent auditor is a state or local
government auditor or a public accountant who meets the independence standards specified in
the General Accounting Office’s “Standards for Audit of Government Organizations, Programs,
Activities, and Functions.”
3.The audit report shall state that the audit was performed in accordance with the provisions of
OMB Circular A-133 (or A-110 as applicable).
4.The reporting requirements for audit reports shall be in accordance with the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants’ (AICPA) audit guide, “Audits of State and Local Governmental Units,”
issued in 1986. The federal government has approved the use of the audit guide.
5.In addition to the audit report, the GRANTEE shall provide comments on the findings and
recommendations in the report, including a plan for corrective action taken or planned and
Amendment # 1 for 2015-2019 Master Grant Contract
Between the Minnesota Department of Health and
City of Edina Community Health Board
comments on the status of corrective action taken on prior findings. If corrective action is not
necessary, a statement describing the reason it is not should accompany the audit report.
6. The GRANTEE agrees that the grantor, the Legislative Auditor, the State Auditor, and any
independent auditor designated by the grantor shall have such access to GRANTEE’S records and
financial statements as may be necessary for the grantor to comply with the Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter 75) and OMB Circular A-133.
7. Subcontractors of federal financial assistance from GRANTEE are also required to comply with the
Single Audit Act Amendments of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter 75) and OMB Circular A-
133.
8. The Statement of Expenditures form can be used for the schedule of federal assistance.
9. The GRANTEE agrees to retain documentation to support the schedule of federal assistance for at
least four years.
10. The GRANTEE agrees to file required audit reports with the State Auditor’s Office, Single Audit
Division, and with federal and state agencies providing federal assistance, within six months of the
grantee’s fiscal year end.
OMB Circular A-133 requires recipients of more than $500,000 in federal funds to submit one copy
of the audit report within 30 days after issuance to the central clearinghouse at the following
address:
Bureau of the Census
Data Preparation Division
1201 East 10th Street
Jeffersonville, Indiana 47132
Attn: Single Audit Clearinghouse
B. Audit Requirements
1. If the Grantee expends total federal assistance of $750,000 or more per year, the Grantee
agrees to: a) obtain either a single audit or a program-specific audit made for the fiscal year in
accordance with the terms of the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter
75) and 2 CFR 200; and, b) to comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended (31 U.S.
Code Chapter 75) and 2 CFR 200.
Audits shall be made annually unless the grantee is a state or local government that has, by
January 1, 1987, a constitutional or statutory requirement for less frequent audits. For those
governments, the federal cognizant agency shall permit biennial audits, covering both years, if
the government so requests. It shall also honor requests for biennial audits by state or local
governments that have an administrative policy calling for audits less frequent than annual, but
only audits prior to 1987 or administrative policies in place prior to January 1, 1987.
2. The audit shall be made by an independent auditor. An independent auditor is a state or local
government auditor or a public accountant who meets the independence standards specified in
the General Accounting Office's “Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs,
Activities, and Functions.”
3. The audit report shall state that the audit was performed in accordance with the provisions of 2
CFR 200.
The reporting requirements for audit reports shall be in accordance with the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants’ (AICPA) audit guide, “Audits of State and Local Governmental
Units,” issued in 1986. The Federal Government has approved the use of the audit guide.
Amendment # 1 for 2015-2019 Master Grant Contract
Between the Minnesota Department of Health and
City of Edina Community Health Board
In addition to the audit report, the Grantee shall provide comments on the findings and
recommendations in the report, including a plan for corrective action taken or planned and
comments on the status of corrective action taken on prior findings. If corrective action is not
necessary, a statement describing the reason it is not should accompany the audit report.
4. The Grantee agrees that the grantor, the Legislative Auditor, the State Auditor, and any
independent auditor designated by the grantor shall have such access to Grantee's records and
financial statements as may be necessary for the grantor to comply with the Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter 75) and 2 CFR 200.
5. If payments under this grant agreement will be made from federal funds obtained by the State
through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5), the Grantee
is responsible for compliance with all federal requirements imposed on these funds. The
Grantee must identify these funds separately on the schedule of expenditures of federal awards
(SEFA), and must also accept full financial responsibility if it fails to comply with federal
requirements. These requirements include, but are not limited to, Title III, part D, of the Energy
Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6321 et seq. and amendments thereto); U.S. Department
of Energy Financial Assistance Rules (10CFR600); and Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
6. Grantees of federal financial assistance from subrecipients are also required to comply with the
Single Audit Act Amendments of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter 75) and 2 CFR 200.
7. The Statement of Expenditures form can be used for the schedule of federal assistance.
8. The Grantee agrees to retain documentation to support the schedule of federal assistance for at
least four (4) years.
9. The Grantee agrees to file required audit reports within nine (9) months of the Grantee's fiscal
year end.
2 CFR 200 requires recipients of more than $750,000 in federal funds to submit one copy of the
audit report within 30 days after issuance to the central clearinghouse at the following address:
Bureau of the Census
Data Preparation Division
1201 East 10th Street
Jeffersonville, Indiana 47132
Attn: Single Audit Clearinghouse
Except as amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Master Grant Project and all previous amendments
remain in full force and effect. The Master Grant Contract, and all previous amendments, are incorporated by
reference into this amendment.
Amendment # 1 for 2015-2019 Master Grant Contract
Between the Minnesota Department of Health and
City of Edina Community Health Board
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Master Grant Contract amendment to be duly executed
intending to be bound thereby.
APPROVED:
1. GRANTEE
The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant contract on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable
articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances.
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
2. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
By:
(with delegated authority)
Title:
Date:
Distribution:
•MDH – Original (fully executed) Master Grant Contract Amendment
•Grantee
•State’s Authorized Representative
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.H.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Authorize Public Improvement And Special
Assessment Agreements
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Authorize Mayor and City Manager to approve attached Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements
for sanitary sewer and water services for the 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction areas and one in 2016
outside of the reconstruction areas.
INTRODUCTION:
Some property owners in the 2015 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction areas upgraded their service lines and
requested that the cost be added to their special assessment. The attached signed agreements allow staff to add
the cost immediately as pending assessments.
This same process is available to property owners outside of neighborhood roadway reconstruction areas and one
special assessment agreement for sanitary sewer and water service lines improvements in 2016 is included for
approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Public Improvement And Special Assessment Agreements
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this 341' day of 20 15, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and P obert C Bennett and Carol B Bennett, husband and
wife, (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 038, Block 002, Subdivision South Harriet Park, 2"
Addition having a street address of 5217 Minnehaha Blvd, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
\t,W--e.c- c.cess
C. Property Owner has replaced their water service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Ouverson Sewer & Water, Inc.,
P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered
into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2685 was issued
to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to
Purchase Order No. 2685 for the amount lof 250.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work
performed and will pay the Contractor. aso-40. trAccv‘r- ckats
S 0-01z. co 0 oo
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City ill assess the Project Cost in the amount ot440thetragainst
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-3. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
PROyE TY OWN
R b rt C Benn tt
A
A L
NOTA" ' PUB 117
GAI
Carol Ei Bennett
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF H-em rfloA )
The foregoing instfument w acknowledged before me this 30 day of (0'; , 20 ,
by L.
PAUL L BOND
NOTARY PUBUC - MINNESOTA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01/31/2020
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this -Z day of C 2015, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Fil ore G. Enger Jr. and Kathleen M. Enger, husband
and wife, (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot, Block 002, Subdivision South Harriet Park, 2" Addition,
having a street address of 5301 Minnehaha Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
C. Property Owner has replaced their water service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Ouverson Sewer & Water, Inc.,
P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered
into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2522 was issued
to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to
Purchase Order No. 2522 for the amount of The City is in r ceipt of a lien waiver for the work
performed and will pay the Contractor. ,,9 53. 4,A-; C S Pe)L-
--) n 4, MN" ,
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. Th it,IT II assess the Project Cost in the amount of $
against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-
3. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to
the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and
any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any
appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
PROPERTY OWNER:
41g
Filmore G. Ender'Jr.
/ ttelcta4C Lk(
Kat leen M. Enger
STATE OF MI NESOTA )
ss.
1
__The foregoing instli nt was cknowleldged befor me is day of _cerA— , 20
c
by I r-1-n
COUNTY OF -elAtAtt
limAAA•wwwwwwwwwmAA, NOTARY UBLIC
SHARON M. ALLISON
Notary Public-Minnesota
My Commission Expires Jan 31,2020
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
AND
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 ,
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
Oft AGREEMENT made this 2 day of 0/6(44 te-r , 20 L( by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Kerry McGrain and Nora McGrain, husband and wife,
(the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 035, Block 002, Subdivision South Harriet Park, 2"d
Addition having a street address of 5229 Minnehaha Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
C. Property Owner has replaced their water service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Hiqhview Plumbing, Inc., 4301
Hiqhview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner
entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2692
was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2692 for the amount of $4,740.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor. f. Varo fer tltd ter /1-<.4_es;1 CI( cal .14 12,r6 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,740.00tgainst
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-3. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
Kerry McGrain
Nora McGrain
PROPERTY OWNER:
STATE OF MINNESOTA „. )
( ss.
COUNTY OF 4 cl/vv\t )
t
i/ The foregoin0i.strument ‘Ais acknowledge efore me this day of 71 LttAij, 20 / S,
by 140-1/117-0) -7145° W,
11c,.kx--
NOTA P BLIC
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_,
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this 7-1 day of Al',1 , 20 1, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Roger Bildsten Jr and Anne Bildsten, husband and wife,
(the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 001, Block 004, Subdivision Glenview Addition to Edina,
having a street address of 5100 Juanita Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service line and has requested that the City
assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer &
Water, 3233 45" Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406., (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement.
Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase
Order No. 2690 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice
to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2690 for the amount of $2,500.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver
for the work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,500.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-3. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
CITY OF EDINA
PROPERTY OWNER:,
Anne Bildsten
STATE OF MINNESOTA
( ss.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of /107 , 20 /s7
by v144/ C9ø -
JONATHANLUIKEN CRAMER
NOTARY puauc - MINNESOTA
My Commission Expires January 31, 2019 wn Anavvvv‘mArommAnnanAAAAmmitA,Pv
BY:
AND
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 _,
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000 RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
"aN AGREEMENT made this P.- 7 11 day of , 20 I 5, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Dan idstrom and Lisa Bjerken, husband and wife, (the
"Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 002, Block 005, Subdivision Glenview Addition to Edina,
having a street address of 5032 Juanita Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer and water service lines and has requested that
the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Hiqhview Plumbing, Inc., 4301
Hlghview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner
entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2698
was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2698 for the amount of $6,290.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,290.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-3. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF 4dr\k)
The foregqing instrument was acknowledged before me this c::cD day of
by -,Ock.n a \,61aSc COrn SCA, 6,S.cLvs
NOTA LIC
PROADERTY OWNER:
7Wat-4
Dana Widstrom
Lisa Bjerken
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
AND
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452-5000 RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
S-fr AGREEMENT made this
1 day of /OR , 20 /5-: by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Clifford Anderson and Virginia Anderson, husband and
wife, (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 007, Block 001, Subdivision Glenview Addition to Edina,
having a street address of 5029 Indianola Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer and water service lines and has requested that
the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Hiqhview Plumbing, Inc., 4301
HIqhview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner
entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2501
was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2501 for the amount of $6,090.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $6,090.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-3. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
PROPERTY OWNER:
Cliffo Anderson
Virginia Anderson
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF ligw-PO4 )
4,The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this `Z--( of /Mt{ , 20/57
by C.1.-66wed) 0/24 Avi)e-RoA'
%/11.4111Whiale ',..' • , r '
I NICHOLAS ALAN PETERSEN
i Notary Public
Minnesota
My Comm. Expires
Jan 31, 2020 P'401.0n 01111m1PRIPINN1:-
STATE OF MINNESOTA
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
NO RY P BLI
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this U day of , 20 I by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and TimothA J Seeley and Melissa A Seeley, husband and
wife, (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 010, Block 003, Subdivision Glenview Addition to Edina,
having a street address of 5136 Indianola Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
C. Property Owner has replaced their water service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Hiahview Plumbing, Inc., 4301
Hiahview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner
entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2513
was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2513 for the amount of $4,445.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4445.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-3. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
C'o/ovc cLcj ,
STATE OF KOINEGIESTOt
COUNTY OF (50•-) lcler
PR PERTY OWNER:
othy J
( ss.
AIM.
JOSHUA DONNIE DANIELS
Notary Public
State of Colorado
NOT Y PUBLIC
CITY OF EDINA
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this i a day of 7,-- 7 , 20 ,
by d_11-S:e_as:i C,, s-rc:,
My Commission Expires
April 25, 2016 BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 ,
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Cutve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:sm
AzAz4 ,4
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this day of t(//1-e/ , 20 Ar-b by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and David Maetzold and Sharon Maetzold, husband and wife,
(the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 004, Block 002, Subdivision Glenview Addition To Edina,
having a street address of 5114 Halifax Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer and water service lines and has requested that
the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer &
Water, 3233 45th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement.
Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase
Order No. 2507 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice
to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2507 for the amount of $5,425.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver
for the work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5A25.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-3. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
David Maetzold
Sharon Maetzold
NICHOLAS ALAN PETERSEN
Notary Public
Minnesota
My Comm. Expires
Jan 311 2020
-MI, 'NW 'Mr- "III "117 NI 'NW- -NP
N TAR PUBLIC
CITY OF EDINA
STATE OF MINNESOTA
( ss.
COUNTY OF AIERA1 )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b fore me this 7e , 2067 day of 3Ci..oc*---
Dfru 4- .-14417.01,, IV1/ c--T t-
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:sm
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this 2 day of UUtiAiL' , 20 lc, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Cary Harvey Schilling, a single person, (the "Property
Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 009, Block 002, Subdivision Brucewood, having a street
address of 5017 Bruce Avenue, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-3.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service line and has requested that the City
assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer &
Water, 3233 45th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement.
Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase
Order No. 2510 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice
to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2510 for the amount of $4,605.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver
for the work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,605.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-3. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-3, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
exeijoreggicg instrugt-ww acl<powledged before me this
•ttAAP)
day of , , 20
Cetiikk'a
NOTARY P1),‘LZ MING LI
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01/31/17
PROPERTY QWNE
N CaryHarveV Schilling
•
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF Co-H
/ nc•
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
JRniPS R. FinViRnri, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 ,
h./ Inrn.nn R ,rid hi Manl rcsennnfil/nit, the+ ItAnlinr nnrl rifl/ RAononny nf +Inn (sifit nf Rrfinn ray ‘0%.41I1/..,./ 1.4. I IV V 11.41 1n./1 441 11.* ....A...0U I I. I IS..41.41, V Laity LI 114 "nu/ 1.0 1.41114 ...sky IV11,11 LI 441 Mt, LA
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Prot:xi:3ml Acsociation
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:sm
/ '4<0,
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this ,20 /4. day of ft1 , avg., by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Basu Hurkadli, a single person, (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 005, Block 001, Subdivision Iroquois Hills Fourth Addition,
having a street address of 7134 Valley View Road, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ,("Public, IMprovement';) and also; consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No:ENG 15-1.
C. Property Owner has replaced their water service line rd ha requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Highview Plumbing, Inc., 4301
Hiqhview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner
entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2500
was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2500 for the amount of $4,295.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,295.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-1. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-1, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
by
COUNTY OF Ilenntiod4
The foregoing instru=nt was ackno
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
ityledgecl.befoAEvc this X) day of , 20 IS, -Akr
WAAAAAMMAAAMAAAMAMANIAAAA,
JADE LYNETT MOSS
Notary Public-Minnesota
My Commission Expires Jen 31,2019
NOTARY PUBLIC
PROPERTY OWNER:
Basu Hurkadli
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this #t day of 0 A rc-6"-- , 20 1, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Nicholas J Wand & Kimberly S Wand, husband and wife,
(the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot, Block 003, Subdivision Birchcrest, having a street address
of 6116 Birchcrest Drive, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 14-4.
C. Property Owner has replaced their water service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Benjamin Franklin Plumbing,
1424 3rd Street No., Minneapolis, MN 55411, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property
Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No.
2610 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2610 for the amount of $27000-.00:The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor. 309 .00 i
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
301z) . 0
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 00:00'against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 14-4. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 14-4, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
PR
erly S Wand
STATE OF MINNESOTA
4 •
( ss.
COUNTY OF "fen ilepi "
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b -; iefore me this P//14" day of /ea e -6 h , 20 5
by Glidt4S 4 k1G1 144 bre-/y L,11,4,4‘,/
GREG T JANASKO
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01/31/18 CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrUrnpnt was acknowledged before me -this day Of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:sm
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this 14 day of AN4 , 20 I , by and between the CITY
OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and John W. Williams, Jr. (the "Property
Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 003, Block 001, Subdivision Edina Highlands
Lakeside Addition, having a street address of 5625 Wycliffe Road, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject
Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s)
from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public
Improvement") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City
Project No. ENG 15-4.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sanitary sewer service lines and has requested that
the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES
AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Minneapolis & Suburban
Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55406, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public
Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public
Improvement and Purchase Order No. 2516 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and
the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2516 for the
amount of $4,250.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the
Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of
$4,250.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City
Project No. ENG 15-4. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to
the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-4, including but
not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the
Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn.
Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property
Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against
the title to the Subject Property.
ENGINEERINQDEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
PERTY OWNER:
A
— ie.*/
. Williams, Jr.
STATE OF MI
COUNTY OF
NESOTA )
( ss.
The foregoing instrument was
, 20 by
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
SHARON M. ALLISON
Notary Public-Minnesota
Calmnissisn Expires Jan 31,2020
oNledged bvforLeime this day of
U. t hk i\cr
• NO AY PUBLIC
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City
Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and
pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
2
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
• 7--/ AGREEMENT made this day of HAI/ , 20k, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Franklin E Tappen and Carol L Tappen, husband and
wife, (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 013, Block 001, Subdivision Holand's 1st Addition, having a
street address of 7306 Claredon Drive, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-5.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Beniamin Franklin Plumbing.,
1424 No. 3rd Street, Minneapolis, MN 55411, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property
Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No.
2694 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2694 for the amount of $4,150.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,150.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-5. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
NOTARY P
TAMMY ENGLAND
NOTARY PUBLIC- MINNESOTA
My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2019
P OP Y40/NER
Franklin E Tappen
eta ,A icpvü
Carol L Tappan
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instru nt was .cknowl dgsl Intnae_this 4/ day of fYlci_> Jr 4
, 20 I
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
by
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this az day of "A ,6-n \/ , 20 I S, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Scott Al-Najim and Jennifer Al-Najim, husband and wife,
(the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 002, Block 001, Subdivision Holand's lst Addition, having a
street address of 5920 Dewey Hill Road, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-5.
C. Property Owner has replaced their water service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Beniamin Franklin Plumbing,
1424 No. VI Street, Minneapolis, MN 55411, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property
Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No.
2505 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2505 for the amount of $7,650.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $7,650.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-5. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
Scott AI-Najim
qau.
JeDnife
(y,
Najmi(--
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF /-7-a///ey, )
The foregoic,ng,,kn_str leic/cigl*lawledged e o by g
e tAs
121vvN
JOSHUA D. ISRAEL
NOTARY PUBLIC • MINNESOTA
Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2018
day of ,20/5
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 ,
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:sm
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this dayday of M , 20 1<by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Jeffrey C Robbins and Susan M Stiles, husband and
wife, (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 006, Block 003, Subdivision Prospect Hills 2nd Addition,
having a street address of 7305 Claredon Drive, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-5.
••
C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Roto-Rooter Plumbing & Drain
Service, 14530 27th Avenue No., Plymouth, MN 55447, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement.
Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase
Order No. 2504 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice
to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2504 for the amount of $8,425.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver
for the work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $8,425.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-5. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard. Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 . Fax 952-826-0392
by
w
VIRGINIA L. HOUCK
NOTARY PUBUC - MINNESOTA My Commission Expires
Januan01,2018 iin AAAAmmAmAAAAmmitAw0AmAmiwr
The foregoing iristrpment was acknowledged before me this day of May
5Ltsa4t AA. SHes
oeXC-e-tc-A
NOTARY PUBLIC
CITY OF EDINA
, 2011',
PROPERTY OWNER:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
( ss.
COUNTY OF /kg
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
AND
( ss.
Jeffrey C Robbins
Susan M Stiles
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF 4..iinkpi )
by
The fore oing instrument was acknowledged before me this 029'0=1 day of pal J
,
CITY OF EDINA
JAIMI L. DITTMER
Notary Public
State of Minnesota
My Commission Expires
January 31, 2018
BY:
AND
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this g.5— day of 68(//tiz , 20 /3, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") a Carl R Maijer and Mary M Maijer, husband and wife, (the
"Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 001, Block 002, Subdivision Hyde Park, having a street
address of 6005 Bonnie Brae Drive, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-5.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Roto-Rooter Plumbing and Drain
Service, 14530 27th Avenue No., Plymouth, MN 55447, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement.
Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase
Order No. 2503 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice
to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 2503 for the amount of $2,565.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver
for the work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,565.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-5. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
PROP
Carl
Mary M
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF 64) )4 )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
by a yet /1.14/17Z 4fr- /1/1.€4,,, AU/ .,i'e'7Z, / )
&e. ------
OTARY PUBLIC
day of C.itt&-e , 20 /-5-
y e_/-/-e- LI-11
LYNETTE BIUNNO
NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA
My Commission Expires Jan, 31, 2016
AO.A1V,
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
AND
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
(
AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 ! , by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and David W Johnston and Kathleen Johnston, husband and
wife, (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 018, Block 001, Subdivision Hyde Park, having a street
address of 7420 Hyde Park Circle, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk
sanitary sewer pipe to the right-of-way line on the Subject Property ("Public Improvement") and also consider
replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 15-5.
C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer service line and has requested that the City assess the
cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote from Benjamin Franklin Plumbing,
5718 International Pkwy, New Hope, MN 55428, (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property
Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No.
2697 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City
referring to Purchase Order No. 2697 for the amount of $5,121.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the
work performed and will pay the Contractor.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,121.00 against
the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 15-5. The
Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the
Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 15-5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any
claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal
rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081.
3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and
the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject
Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392
PROPERTY' W EiR:
(
David W Johnst n
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
Q )( • ) COUNTY OF
\ trument w
,
e this day of , The fo'
by 1)(1\4 ( ,\
owledged bef
3 \i/n ."---
Kathleen Jo nston
NOTA Y PUBLIC
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 ,
by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (612) 452-5000
RNK:srn
AND
SS.
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND
AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this 1 day of , 204, by and between the CITY OF EDINA,
a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Michael W Truman and Jennifer E Truman, husband and
wife (the "Property Owner").
RECITALS
A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 004, Block 001, Subdivision Edina Heights, having a street
address of 5113 Grove Street, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property").
13. Property Owner has replaced the existing sanitary sewer and water service lines on the Subject
Property ("Public Improvement")
C. Property Owner has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the
Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE
PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The City has received a quote of $9,500.00 (the "Project Cost")
from Norton Homes, 18215 45" Avenue North, Suite D, Plymouth, MN 55446, (the "Contractor") to
construct the Public Improvement. The City shall issue a Purchase Order with the Contractor to construct the
Public Improvement. The City will pay the Contractor the Project Cost upon receipt of lien waivers.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost, and administrative costs in the
total amount of $9,500.00 against the Subject Property. The assessment shall be spread over 15 years, together
with 6.5% interest per year on the unpaid balance. The first installment shall be due and payable with taxes in
2017. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments
and to the Public Improvement, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the
assessments exceed the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise
available pursuant to Minn. State. § 429.081.
3, BINDING EFFECTIVE; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property
Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the
Subject Property.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina,Minnesota.55439
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 Fax 952-826-0392
PROPERT
Truman Michae
i(unan
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( SS.
COUNTY OF --A/ENKIERN
The foregoing instrum,ent was acknowledged before me this Vit. day of K1 ,
620 i(=>, by ;c
CHRISTOPHER ALBERT KING
NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA
MY COMMISSION WIRES 01/31/2020
NOTARY PUBLIC...,
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
James B. Hovland, Mayor
AND:
Scott H. Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( SS.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of
Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by
its City Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
156553v02
RNM703/08/2011
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.I.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase - ENG 16-13 Xerxes Avenue
Sidewalk Improvements
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Request for Purchase for the Xerxes Avenue Sidewalk Improvement project.
INTRODUCTION:
See attached detailed Request for Purchase Report
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
ENG 16-13 Request for Purchase Xerxes Ave Sidewalk
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
June 21, 2016
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
☒
☐
Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Request For Purchase - Contract ENG 16-13 Xerxes Avenue Sidewalk Improvements
June 9, 2016 July 9, 2016
Concrete Idea, Inc. $448,866.25
Blackstone Contractors, LLC $462,945.00
G.L. Contracting, Inc. $497,178.40
Pember Companies, Inc. $522,988.50
G.Urban Companies, Inc. $552,907.50
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Concrete Idea, Inc. $448,866.25
Information/Background:
The Xerxes Avenue Sidewalk Improvements will construct sidewalks and pedestrian crossing improvements
along the west side of Xerxes Avenue from West 60th Street to West 56th Street. This new sidewalk will fill
an existing sidewalk facilities gap on Xerxes Avenue between those intersecting streets, as sidewalks exist
both north and south of this project. This project is also identified in the Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk
Facilities Map.
Funding for the project will be from the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. In addition, Hennepin
County will provide $100,000 towards the project as part of an agreement signed and approved on July 15,
2015.
Staff recommends awarding the project to Concrete Idea, Inc.
g:\eng\const\contracts\2016\eng 16-13 xerxes ave sidewalk\s046 xerxes_56th_60th\admin\misc\rfp_xerxes sidewalk award.docx
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.J.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase - Comprehensive Water
Resources Management Plan Update
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Request for Purchase for Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) Update
INTRODUCTION:
See attached request for purchase.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Request For Purchase
CWRMP Scope of Work
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
June 21, 2016
City Council
☒
☐
Ross Bintner P.E. – Environmental Engineer
Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Update
June 6, 2016 n/a
Barr Engineering $200,580.00
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Barr Engineering
Information/Background:
Barr has a master services agreement with the City and this work would continue the service they provide
on storm water modeling and analysis. The funding source is the storm water utility as part of CIP item #15-
170. Edina’s original Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (CWRMP) was adopted in 2004, and
the first revision occurred in 2011. The corresponding hydrologic and hydraulic model that informs the plan
was created in 2004, with a minor update in 2011.
The CWRMP is used as a tool to identify, plan for and address flood and water quality issues. The CWRMP
and model also define local flood plain to guide redevelopment standards that limit or prevent future risk to
life or property. This update of the CWRMP will include a substantive effort to update the hydrologic and
hydraulic model and will inform the 2018 Edina comprehensive plan. The attached scope of service details
the model and plan update to incorporate the following substantive information.
1. Since the creation of the 2004 model, Edina has reconstructed 73 of miles streets and improved
associated utilities. These projects addressed a variety of stormwater, drainage and flood issues
identified in the plan and improved or created storm sewer conduits.
2. Improved topographic survey using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) now provides increased
accuracy in defining overland flow paths, and flood storage areas.
3. Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts are updating their corresponding plans,
per Minnesota Rule 8410.
4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has advanced precipitation risk
understanding with the recent publication of NOAA Atlas 14.
June 6, 2016
Ross Bintner and Jessica Wilson Engineering Department City of Edina
7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439
Re: Proposal for Stormwater Modeling Updates and Tasks Related to Updating the City’s Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan
Dear Mr. Bintner and Ms. Wilson:
This letter presents our proposed scope of services and budget for completion of stormwater modeling
updates, as well as associated tasks related to updating the City’s Comprehensive Water Resources
Management Plan (CWRMP). The scope of work presented below is based on a draft cost estimate
developed for the City for Capital Improvement Program (CIP) planning purposes in June of 2014 and
also reflects additional tasks discussed during our May 11, 2016 meeting. The proposed scope of work
includes a comprehensive list of tasks and associated costs to update the stormwater modeling and update
the City’s CWRMP, assuming Barr completes all of the tasks with assistance from the City as referenced
in the scope.
Project Understanding
It is our understanding that the City is seeking assistance with updating the XP-SWMM stormwater
models to account for more accurate elevation data and updated NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall frequency
depths, among other revisions. The updated models will be used to establish Atlas 14 100-year flood
levels, identify flooding issues, and help identify and prioritize potential system improvements.
It is our understanding that the City is also seeking assistance with updating the CWRMP to include the
updated hydrologic and hydraulic modeling and other requirements resulting from watershed district plan
updates. The CWRMP must also satisfy regulatory requirements of the Board of Water and Soil
Resources (BWSR) provided in Minnesota Statute 103B.235 and Minnesota Rules 8410. Barr will work
closely with City staff to ensure that the updated CWRMP conforms to the requirements and desired
content for the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Project Scope of Work
The baseline scope of work, as well as a potential additional scope item (add-on), are described in more
detail below.
June 6, 2016
Page 2
Stormwater Modeling and CWRMP Updates (Baseline Scope)
Task 1 – Update and Run XP-SWMM Models
Barr will update the City’s existing XP-SWMM models to account for the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 precipitation depths and intensities. The models will also
be updated to incorporate more up-to-date storm sewer system data and changes to storm sewer
infrastructure that have occurred since the development of the existing XP-SWMM models.
The model updates will include redefining storage and surface overflow routes using the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) 2011 LiDAR elevation data, as needed. The updated XP-
SWMM models will be run for the 10-year, and 100-year frequency 24-hour rainfall events. For
landlocked areas, the 10-day snowmelt event will be run.
The assumptions and deliverables for Task 1 are described further below.
Assumptions:
• The City will provide GIS data for the City’s storm sewer system and any associated data that can
help identify areas where improvements have been made to storm sewer infrastructure, including as-built construction drawings for storm sewer improvements that have occurred since 2003.
• The City’s storm sewer GIS data will be compared to data used for original model development. Pipe invert or top-of-casting elevations will not be adjusted unless differences in elevations are
greater than 0.25 feet or if the updated elevations reflect changed water level control elevations
(e.g., discharge pipe from pond/wetland or beehive catch basins).
• Subwatershed divides will be reviewed for major deviations from the MN DNR 2011 LiDAR,
and will be adjusted as necessary, but city-wide subwatershed re-delineation will not be performed.
• Hydrologic parameters will be updated, as needed, to reflect updated SSURGO soils data. For areas where the published SSURGO data does not provide a hydrologic soil group, soil assumptions from the original XP-SWMM modeling analysis will be used. Land use-based
impervious assumptions from the original XP-SWMM modeling analysis will be reviewed with City staff and updated, as needed. If the City opts to conduct a city-wide impervious analysis
(Task 8), impervious inputs will be adjusted accordingly. Other hydrologic inputs such as
watershed width and slope will not be updated.
• The City will provide verification of lift station information for pumps throughout the city,
including on/off elevations and flow rates.
• The proposed scope of work includes up to 8 hours of field verification of subwatershed divides
and/or storm sewer configuration. The City will provide additional field survey assistance, if needed.
• Model QA/QC will conducted by modeler and technical lead using Barr’s XP-SWMM checklist.
• The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) will provide their Atlas 14 XP-SWMM
Minnehaha Creek model or will provide the results of the appropriate simulated frequency events
for use as tailwater conditions.
• The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) will provide their Atlas 14 XP-SWMM
creek model for use as tailwater conditions.
June 6, 2016
Page 3
Deliverables:
• Client Service Plan to document City expectations, goals, and preferences. This plan will be a
guide to all team members and will be discussed at the project kick-off meeting.
• XP-SWMM models for the 10-year and 100-year flood frequency events
• GIS data, including subwatersheds and modeled storm sewer pipes and manholes
Task 2 - Issue Identification/Problem Assessment
To evaluate whether the revised Atlas 14 precipitation depths result in flooding concerns, preliminary
inundation mapping will be prepared representing the areas of inundation based on the 100-year peak
water surface elevations. The inundation areas will be compared with GIS building footprint information
(if available from the City) and other low entry elevation information provided by the City to determine if
structures are impacted. Additional mapping will include comparing Atlas 14 flood inundation areas with
known flooding problems from the City’s 2011 CWRMP. We will then meet with City staff to present the
results of the issues identification analyses and determine areas to be studied further at either a cursory or
detailed level and whether additional field survey is required (not included in this scope of work).
Barr will then evaluate alternatives for those problem areas identified during the first meeting. The
results of the alternatives evaluation will be summarized and presented to the City at a second meeting.
Barr will then develop text for the CWRMP describing the results of the alternatives evaluation. We will
also prepare an inventory of properties known to be impacted by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) regulatory floodplain and floodway, or impacted by local flooding as identified through
the model update and issue identification efforts described in Tasks 1 and 2.
The attached cost estimate (Attachment 1) provides additional detail regarding the subtasks under Task 2.
The assumptions and deliverables are described further below.
Assumptions:
• The City will provide building footprint information in GIS or CAD format for intersection with the GIS 100-year flood inundation data layer. The City will also provide a summary of known
low entry elevations for properties with known flood concerns.
• Two meetings will be held with City staff during the course of this task
• Scope of work assumes 20 localized flooding areas will be evaluated at a cursory level to identify problems (e.g., limited downstream capacity) and potential solutions (assumes 8 hours each, including summary text development)
• Scope of work assumes 4 regional flooding areas will be evaluated at a more detailed level
(assumes 40 hours each, including summary text development)
• Hennepin County’s pending (2016) FEMA floodplain and floodway GIS data will be used for the inventory of properties impacted by floodway and/or floodplain.
Deliverables:
• Preliminary GIS data files showing inundation areas identified through modeling and GIS
analyses – this will include preliminary 100-year flood inundation mapping (raster/grid data set), an overlay of known flooding areas from the 2011 CWRMP (for comparison with preliminary
June 6, 2016
Page 4
Atlas 14 100-year flood inundation mapping), and preliminary depth of flooding mapping (raster/grid data set)
• Memorandum with summary text describing the evaluation of problem areas (both cursory level and detailed level)
• Table of properties and structures impacted by flooding (local or regional) and floodway, and associated text for the CWRMP describing all data in the table, as well as development or redevelopment implications
Task 3 - Revise CWRMP to Reflect Updated Modeling
The tables in the current CWRMP summarizing hydrologic model inputs and results will be updated to
reflect the revised modeling, including peak water surface elevations for the 10-year, and 100-year flood
events. The modeling methodology section of the CWRMP (Section 4) will be updated to reflect model
revisions. Text summarizing flood concerns within each major watershed plan section will also be
updated. The large-format figures included in the 2011 CWRMP for each major watershed will also be
updated to include the new GIS 100-year flood inundation mapping.
Attachment 1 provides additional detail regarding all of the subtasks under Task 3. The assumptions and
deliverables are described further below.
Assumptions:
• 10 large-format figures will be updated (1 for each major watershed), including addition of flood inundation areas and updated color-coding of manholes to reflect surcharge conditions. Note that
the cost estimate assumes 48 hours for this task, based on a likelihood that the GIS flood
inundation polygons will be generated using the MnDNR LiDAR data and will need “smoothing” for presentation in the CWRMP figures.
• Scope of work assumes Tables #.1, #.2, and #.3 will be updated for each major watershed
• Scope of work assumes Tables #.4 will be removed from the CWRMP for each major watershed
• City staff will provide one round of review comments
Deliverables:
• Updated Tables #.1, #.2, and #.3 for Sections 5 through 14 (42 tables)
• 10 large-format figures in a PDF format (1 for each major watershed)
• Updated CWRMP Section 4.1 (Methodology for Hydrologic/Hydraulic Modeling)
• Updated CWRMP Sections X.3.1 (Implementation Considerations- Flood Protection Projects)
will be updated for each major watershed
Task 4 - Revise CWRMP to Reflect Other Updates
Task 4 includes several subtasks needed to complete the CWRMP that are unrelated to stormwater
modeling updates. These subtasks include updates and revisions to the CWRMP, including text, figure
and table updates for the following plan sections or topics: Section 1 (Executive Summary), Section 2
(Introduction and Physical Setting), Section 15 (Issues and Implementation), and Section 16 (Wetlands).
Sections 5 through 14 (Major Drainage Areas) will also be revised and reformatted to reduce
redundancies between each section.
June 6, 2016
Page 5
Attachment 1 provides additional detail regarding all of the subtasks under Task 4. The assumptions and
deliverables are described further below.
Assumptions:
• City staff will complete any necessary edits to Section 3 (Policies for Stormwater Management)
• One meeting will be held with City staff during the course of this task
• CWRMP text will be provided in an MS Word format and figures will be provided in a PDF
format
• Revised implementation tables (Tables 15.3 and 15.4) will be prioritized by City staff
Deliverables:
• Updated CWRMP Section 1 (Executive Summary)
• Updated CWRMP Section 2 (Introduction and Physical Setting)
• Updated CWRMP Section 15 (Issues and Implementation)
• Updated CWRMP Section 16 (Wetlands)
• Updated CWRMP figures for Section 2 (Introduction and Physical Setting), Section 15 (Issues
and Implementation), and Section 16 (Wetlands).
• Reformatted text for the major drainage areas
• Revised implementation tables (Tables 15.3 and 15.4)
Task 5 – Review and Approval Process
Task 5 includes several subtasks to provide assistance with the CWRMP review submittal and approval
process.
Assumptions:
• Review drafts of the CWRMP will be provided to stakeholders in an electronic version, unless
otherwise noted in Attachment 1.
Deliverables:
• Review draft of CWRMP to City staff for comment
• Revised draft of CWRMP for submittal to City Council and stakeholders for comment
• Presentation summarizing CWRMP updates for City Council
• Draft response(s) to stakeholder comments
• Revised draft of CWRMP for resubmittal to stakeholders for final approval
• Final CWRMP document in hard copy and electronic format
June 6, 2016
Page 6
Potential Additional Scope Item (Add-on)
Additional work items that extend beyond the baseline scope associated with the modeling and CWRMP
updates are described below. Associated subtasks and cost estimate information are provided in
Attachment 1.
Task 8 – Analysis of City-wide Imperviousness Assumptions
A statistical analysis of existing imperviousness will be performed on a neighborhood- or commercial
zone- scale using land use and impervious data. The statistical impervious analysis will be conducted
using the most current satellite-derived impervious data available from the University of Minnesota. This
information will be used to evaluate the existing state of imperviousness throughout different areas of the
city and inform modeling assumptions.
Assumptions:
• City staff will provide neighborhood or commercial zone areas in a GIS format
• The analysis will use the City’s 2020 land use information in a GIS format.
Deliverables:
• Brief (one-to-two page) summary of statistical analysis and associated GIS figure (PDF format)
Project Team
Barr proposes the following key team members for this project:
Janna Kieffer, P.E., Vice President, Water Resources Engineer
Janna will serve as Barr’s principal in charge for the project. Janna has over 14 years of experience
with stormwater management, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and water quality modeling and has
been working with the City of Edina since 2002. Janna was involved in development of the City’s
2003 CWRMP and supporting XP-SWMM and P8 models and served as project manager for the
2011 CWRMP Update.
Sarah Stratton, CFM, ENV SP, Senior Water Resources Scientist
Sarah will serve as Barr’s Project Manager. Sarah has over 17 years of experience with stormwater
management, GIS, hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, and water quality modeling and has been
managing projects at Barr since 2004.
Cory Anderson, P.E., Water Resources Engineer Cory will serve as the Technical Lead for the XP-SWMM stormwater modeling updates. Cory has
over 6 years of experience in water resources engineering. His experience includes several hydrologic
and hydraulic modeling projects, including the STS-406 stormwater modeling and analysis project for
the City in 2012-2014.
June 6, 2016
Page 7
Project Schedule
The following table summarizes the proposed schedule associated with each of the main tasks described
in both the baseline scope of work and the potential additional scope items.
Task Task Name Estimated Start Date* Estimated Completion Date*
Baseline Scope of Work
1 Update and Run XP-SWMM models July 1, 2016 December 31, 2016
2 Issue Identification/Problem Assessment January 1, 2017 March 31, 2017
3 Revise CWRMP to Reflect Updated Modeling January 1, 2017 January 31, 2017
4 Revise CWRMP to Reflect Other Updates July 1, 2016 May 31, 2017
5 CWRMP Review and Approval June 1, 2017 December 31, 2017
Potential Additional Scope Item
8
Analysis of City-wide Imperviousness by Neighborhood July 1, 2016 July 31, 2016
*Assumes notice to proceed by July 1, 2016.
Project Cost Estimate
The estimated hours and costs associated with each task (and subtasks) described in the project scope of
work are included in Attachment 1.We propose to complete this work on a time and expense basis.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this proposal for services for this project. Please do not
hesitate to contact either of us if you have any questions related to this proposal. We look forward to
working with you on this project.
Regards,
Janna Kieffer Sarah Stratton Principal-in-Charge Project Manager
Attachment 1: Detailed Task Summary
Task
Task 1 Update and Run XP‐SWMM Models
a Project kick‐off meeting with City staff 8 1,130.00$ 1,130.00$
b Review subwatersheds and storm sewer data 101 8,130.00$ 8,130.00$
c Complete storm sewer additions and updates in XP‐SWMM Models 138 10,930.00$ 10,930.00$
d Update storage and suface overflows using MN DNR 2011 LiDAR 96 8,510.00$ 8,510.00$
e
Update hydrologic parameters, as needed. Infiltration parameters will be updated to reflect SURGO soils data. Watershed widths will not be updated.
Impervious assumptions will remain consistent with existing model.86 7,640.00$ 7,640.00$
f Model Updates for Accommodating Increased Atlas 14 Precipitation‐ "Capture" excess stormwater by adding additional surface overflows.326 25,210.00$ 25,210.00$
g Boundary Condition/Tailwater (Nine Mile Creek & Minnehaha Creek)112 10,060.00$ 10,060.00$
h Limited Field Verifications 14 1,365.00$ 1,365.00$
i Combine existing XP‐SWMM models for model run efficiency 19 2,440.00$ 2,440.00$
j Model QAQC Review 60 8,020.00$ 8,020.00$
k Run 10‐year and 100‐yr Rainfall Events (Atlas 14 precip depth)48 3,900.00$ 3,900.00$
l Run 10‐day Snowmelt Event 32 2,740.00$ 2,740.00$
Subtotal 1040 90,075.00$ ‐$ 90,075.00$
Task 2 Issue Identification/Problem Assessment
a Map 100‐yr rainfall event flood inundation areas (water bodies, back yard depression areas and street flooding) 40 3,830.00$ 3,830.00$
b Review Results‐ develop GIS layer comparing Atlas 14 flood inundation areas with known flooding problems from the City’s 2011 CWRMP 17 1,830.00$ 1,830.00$
c Review Results‐ perfom GIS depth of flooding analysis (to flag areas of greater concern) 17 1,830.00$ 1,830.00$
d Meetings with City staff, preparation and attendance (assumes 2 meetings)24 3,050.00$ 3,050.00$
e
Alternatives evaluation for localized flooding areas identified through modeling ‐ assumes 20 areas evaluated at a cursory level (8 hours each, including
development of summary text)160 16,580.00$ 16,580.00$
f
Alternatives evaluation for reginal flooding areas identified through modeling ‐ assumes 4 areas evaluated at a more detailed level (40 hours each,
including development of summary text and a GIS figure)160 16,690.00$ 16,690.00$
g
Floodplain/Floodway/Localized Flooding property inventory ‐ prepare table of impacted properties/structures (differentiate b/t local and creek
flooding) and associated text 40 3,880.00$ 3,880.00$
Subtotal 458 47,690.00$ ‐$ 47,690.00$
Task 3 Revise CWRMP to Reflect Updated Modeling
a Update Section 4 text (Modeling Methodology) to summarize modeling updates 20 2,435.00$ 2,435.00$
b Incorporate flooding issues text into Sections 5 through 14 (from Task 2)12 1,470.00$ 1,470.00$
c Update CWRMP tables #.1, #.2, and #.3 for Sections 5 through 14. Remove tables #.4 from Sections 5 through 14. 68 5,430.00$ 5,430.00$
d GIS inundation map figures ‐ add 100‐year flood inundation areas to the large‐scale map for each of the 10 major watersheds 48 4,080.00$ 4,080.00$
Subtotal 148 13,415.00$ ‐$ 13,415.00$
Task 4 Revise CWRMP to Reflect Other Updates
a Section 1 (Executive Summary): Update text 14 1,660.00$ 1,660.00$
b Section 2 (Introduction and Physical Setting): Update text 24 2,510.00$ 2,510.00$
d Update nine (9) general figures in Sections 2 (Introduction and Physical Setting), 15 (Issues and Implementation), and 16 (Wetlands)42 3,490.00$ 3,490.00$
e
Section 15 (Implementation): Water Quality‐ Future Opportunity ‐ brief narrative of GIS screening analysis that could be performed to identify potential
reuse opportunities 7 980.00$ 980.00$
f
Section 15 (Implementation): Water Quality‐ Future Opportunity ‐ brief narrative of GIS analsyis that could be performed to identify infiltration
potential /opportunities 7 940.00$ 940.00$
g
Section 15 (Implementation): Water Quality‐ Future Opportunity ‐ brief narrative of stormwater pond inventory and maintenance program that could
be performed 5 700.00$ 700.00$
h Section 15 (Implementation): Revise implementation tables (Table 15.3 and 15.4) based on input from City staff 24 3,060.00$ 3,060.00$
j Section 15 (Implementation): Update text in implementation section.14 1,880.00$ 1,880.00$
k Section 15 (Implementation): One (1) meeting with City staff, including preparation and attendance 8 1,130.00$ 1,130.00$
l Section 16 (Wetlands): Update text.8 1,090.00$ 1,090.00$
m Sections 5 ‐ 14 (Major Drainage Areas): revise/reformat stormwater system analysis text 8 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$
n Other revisions to meet MCWD and NMCWD watershed management plan requirements. Level of effort to be determined‐ assume 80 hours.80 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$
Subtotal 241 28,440.00$ ‐$ 28,440.00$
Task 5 CWRMP Review and Approval
a Submit draft to City for review and comment. Meet with City to discuss comments. Revise draft in response to City comments 34 4,040.00$ 4,040.00$
b Preparation for and attendance at public meeting, meeting follow‐up.16 2,260.00$ 2,260.00$
c
Present draft plan to City Council for approval to submit to stakeholders for review (WMOs, Met Council, Hennepin County, adjoining cities). Includes
time for preparation and attendance at City Council meeting. Assume 2 sets of hard copies.16 2,260.00$ 500.00$ 2,760.00$
d
Submit to stakeholders, review stakeholder comments and prepare draft responses. Includes two (2) meetings with watershed districts to discuss draft
reponses.30 4,400.00$ 4,400.00$
e Revise plan per comments/responses and resubmit revised CWRMP to the watershed districts for final approval. Assume 2 sets of hard copies. 20 2,760.00$ 500.00$ 3,260.00$
f Present revised plan to City Council for final approval (includes preparation for and attendance at Council meeting). 10 1,420.00$ 1,420.00$
g Final plan production (assumes 2 sets hard copies). Additional hard copies @ $250 per copy in addition to total shown. 20 2,320.00$ 500.00$ 2,820.00$
Subtotal 146 19,460.00$ 1,500.00$ 20,960.00$
Task 8 Analysis of City‐wide Imperviousness Assumptions (Add‐On)
Subtotal 56 5,330.00$ ‐$ 5,330.00$
Project Totals (with Task 8 add‐on)2089 204,410.00$ 1,500.00$ 205,910.00$
2033 199,080.00$ 1,500.00$ 200,580.00$
Project Name: City of Edina Stormwater Modeling
Updates
Client Name: City of Edina
Date: 6/6/2016
Subtotal
Hours
Subtotal
Labor Expenses
Project
Total
Project Totals (without Task 8 add‐on)
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.K.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer
Item Activity:
Subject:Request for Purchase - Approve Proposal for
Geotechnical Evaluation Services for the 2017
Neighborhood Improvement Areas
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Request for Purchase for the 2017 Neighborhood Improvement Area Geotechnical Evaluation Services
INTRODUCTION:
See attached detailed Request for Purchase Report.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
RFP 2017 Area Geotechnical Evaluations
2017 Edina Street Improvements Geotechnical Proposal
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
June 21, 2016
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
☒
☐
Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer
Request For Purchase – Approve Proposal for Geotechnical Evaluation Services for the 2017
Neighborhood Improvement Areas
June 14, 2016
Braun Intertec Corporation $20,540.00
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Braun Intertec Corporation $20,540.00
Information/Background:
This proposal is provided in accordance with Braun Intertec Corporation’s Professional Services agreement
with the City of Edina. This proposal includes four 2017 neighborhood project areas. The project areas and
their respective portions of the total quote amounts are listed in the table below.
Area City Improvement
Number
Cost
Birchcrest A BA-425 $9,455.00
Countryside B BA-426 $4,235.00
Countryside G BA-427 $4,175.00
Chowen Park D BA-439 $2,675.00
These costs will be reported separately per project area and are funded by special assessment divided equally
among the resident equivalent units within each project area.
Staff recommends approving the proposal.
g:\eng\const\imprs\ba425 birchcrest a(2017)\design\soil borings\rfp_2017 recon soil borings.docx
AA/EOE
Braun Intertec Corporation
11001 Hampshire Avenue S
Minneapolis, MN 55438
Phone: 952.995.2000
Fax: 952.995.2020
Web: braunintertec.com
June 14, 2016 Proposal QTB039777/039791/039787/039796
Chad Millner, PE
City of Edina
7450 Metro Boulevard
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Proposal for Geotechnical Evaluations
2017 Street Improvement Projects
Birchcrest A, Countryside B, Countryside G, and Chowen Park D Neighborhoods
City Improvement numbers BA-425, BA-426, BA-427 and BA-439
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Millner:
We are pleased to submit this proposal for geotechnical evaluations for the proposed Birchcrest A,
Countryside B, Countryside G, and Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction projects.
These projects are included in the 2017 Street Improvement Projects for the City of Edina.
Description and Understanding of Project
We understand the 2017 Street Improvements for Edina will include the reconstruction of the Birchcrest
A, Countryside B, Countryside G, and Chowen Park D neighborhoods. As part of the design and planning,
the city has requested soil borings and geotechnical evaluation services for each of the improvement
projects.
We understand the planned improvements may include full depth reconstruction of the pavement
section and potential reconstruction of some of the existing underground utilities (storm, sanitary and
watermain).
Project Goals
The purpose of the soil borings and geotechnical evaluation will be to provide the city with geotechnical
information regarding the existing soil and pavement conditions and recommendations for design and
reconstruction of roadways and utilities.
Proposed Scope of Services
The following tasks are proposed to help us meet our project goals. If unfavorable or unforeseen
conditions are encountered at any point during the completion of these tasks that lead us to recommend
an expanded scope of services, we will contact you to discuss those conditions before resuming our
work.
City of Edina
QTB039777/039791/039787/039796
June 14, 2016
Page 2
Site Access, Staking and Utility Clearance
All soil borings will be located within existing roads and we have assumed all locations are accessible to a
truck mounted drill rig. Depending on access requirements or ground conditions, our field crew may alter
the exploration locations from those proposed to facilitate accessibility.
We will stake the boring locations and obtain ground surface elevations at those locations using GPS
technology.
Prior to drilling, we will contact Gopher State One Call and request they notify the appropriate utility
vendors to mark and clear the exploration locations of public underground utilities. We request you or
your authorized representative notify Braun Intertec Corporation immediately of the presence and
location of any underground objects or private utilities that are not the responsibility of public agencies.
Braun Intertec will take reasonable precautions to avoid underground objects.
Traffic Control
Braun Intertec will provide temporary traffic control (signs and cones) during completion of the soil
borings. In addition to signage, flagmen are anticipated to complete the borings along Valley View Road
for the Countryside B neighborhood. The cost of flagmen is included in the proposed fees. If flagmen are
required for the other projects due to unsafe traffic or work conditions, we can provide a 2-man flagging
crew for a fee of $150 per hour.
Penetration Test Borings
As requested, we propose to complete a total of 26 standard penetration test (SPT) borings for this
project. The proposed number and depth of borings are provided in the Table 1. Please refer to the
attached map for the proposed boring locations.
Table 1. Proposed Boring Quantities and Depths
Area Number of Borings Proposed Depths
Birchcrest A (Borings 1-13, 15-17) 16 10 ft
Birchcrest A (Boring 14) 1 15 ft
Countryside B 3 10 ft
Countryside G 5 10 ft
Chowen Park D 1 10 ft
The borings will be performed to the proposed depths, unless unsuitable soil conditions warrant deeper
exploration, in which case the city will be contacted. Penetration tests will be performed continuously
(below the pavement) to 5 feet and then at 2 1/2-foot intervals to 15 feet.
If groundwater is encountered in the boreholes, the depth where it is observed will be recorded on the
boring logs. The approximate thickness of the bituminous pavement and aggregate base (if present) will
also be recorded at each boring location. Samples of the aggregate base material will also be recovered.
City of Edina
QTB039777/039791/039787/039796
June 14, 2016
Page 3
Pavement Cores
We understand some of the streets in the Birchcrest A neighborhood are currently concrete pavement.
Therefore we propose to mobilize a 2-man coring crew to core through the concrete. Coring will allow for
a better measurement of the pavement thickness.
Borehole Abandonment
Minnesota Well Code requires us to seal any boring that encounters groundwater and is either greater
than 25 feet deep or penetrates a confining layer. Based on the intended exploration depths, we do not
anticipate grouting of the boreholes will be required.
Sample Review and Laboratory Testing
Soil samples will be returned to our laboratory where they will be visually classified and logged by a
geotechnical engineer in general accordance with ASTM D2487. To help classify the materials
encountered and estimate their engineering properties, we have budgeted to perform the laboratory
testing below. Actual laboratory tests performed will be dependent on the soils encountered and will be
at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer.
Table 2. Proposed Laboratory Testing
Project
Moisture
content tests
(ASTM D2216)
Sieve analyses through #200
sieve only (ASTM D1140) Organic content tests (ASTM D2974)
Birchcrest A 30 5 3
Countryside B 5 2 1
Countryside G 6 2 1
Chowen Park D 1 1 1
Reporting
Data obtained from the borings and laboratory tests will be used to evaluate the subsurface profile and
groundwater conditions, perform engineering analyses related to pavement and utility design and
performance, and prepare Geotechnical Evaluation Reports. Separate Geotechnical Evaluation Reports
will be prepared for each of the improvement projects.
The Geotechnical Evaluation Reports will include the following:
A CAD sketch showing the boring locations.
Logs of the borings describing the materials encountered and presenting the results of our
groundwater measurements and laboratory tests.
A summary of the subsurface profile and groundwater conditions.
Discussions regarding the reuse of on-site materials during construction, and of the impact of
groundwater on construction.
Recommendations for preparing utility and pavement subgrades, including soil correction
depths, if applicable, and the selection, placement, and compaction of excavation backfill
and other structural fill.
Geotechnical recommendations for the design of pavements, including estimated R-values
and pavement sections, and utilities.
City of Edina
QTB039777/039791/039787/039796
June 14, 2016
Page 4
Only an electronic copy of our report will be submitted to you unless you request otherwise. At your
request, copies can be submitted to other project team members.
Cost
We will furnish the services described in this proposal for a total fee of $20,540. The portions of the fees
associated with each neighborhood included in the proposal are provided in the table below.
Table 3. Proposed Costs
Area City Improvement Number Braun Intertec Proposal Number Cost
Birchcrest A BA-425 QTB039777 $9,455
Countryside B BA-426 QTB039791 $4,235
Countryside G BA-427 QTB039787 $4,175
Chowen Park D BA-439 QTB039796 $2,675
Total Cost $20,540
Separate invoices, including the City Improvement Number, will be generated for each project. Our work
may extend over several invoicing periods. As such, for work that is performed during the course of each
invoicing period, we will submit partial progress invoices. All invoices are due upon receipt.
Schedule
We anticipate our work can be performed according to the following schedule:
Drill rig Mobilization – Within about 2-3 weeks following receipt of authorization.
Field Exploration – 3 days to complete the drilling.
Classification and Laboratory Testing – Within 2 weeks following completion of the field
exploration.
Preliminary Results and Recommendations – within 1 week of field work. We plan to meet
with you to review the results and recommendations prior to report submittal.
Report Submittal – Within about 5 weeks of authorization.
If our proposed scope of services cannot be completed according to this schedule due to circumstances
beyond our control, we may need to revise this proposal prior to completing the remaining tasks.
General Remarks
Braun Intertec appreciates the opportunity to present this Proposal to you. Please sign and return a copy
in its entirety.
The proposed fee is based on the scope of services described and the assumptions that our services will
be authorized within 30 days and that others will not significantly delay us beyond our proposed
schedule.
General Conditions
GC Page 1 of 2
Section 1: Our Agreement
1.1 Our agreement (“Agreement”) with you
consists of these General Conditions and the
accompanying written proposal or
authorization. This Agreement is our entire
agreement. It supersedes prior agreements. It
may be modified only in a writing signed by us,
making specific reference to the provision
modified.
1.2 The words “you,” “we,” “us,” and “our”
include officers, employees, and
subcontractors.
1.3 In the event you use a purchase order or
other form to authorize our services, any
conflicting or additional terms are not part of
our Agreement. Directing us to start work prior
to execution of this Agreement constitutes your
acceptance. If, however, mutually acceptable
terms cannot be established, we have the right
to withdraw our proposal without liability to
you or others, and you will compensate us for
services already rendered.
Section 2: Our Responsibilities
2.1 We will provide the services specifically
described in our Agreement with you. You
agree that we are not responsible for services
that are not fairly included in our specific
undertaking. Unless otherwise agreed in
writing, our findings, opinions, and
recommendations will be provided to you in
writing. You agree not to rely on oral findings,
opinions, or recommendations without our
written approval.
2.2 In performing our professional services,
we will use that degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised under similar
circumstances by reputable members of our
profession practicing in the same locality. If you
direct us to deviate from our recommended
procedures, you agree to hold us harmless from
claims, damages, and expenses arising out of
your direction.
2.3 We will reference our field observations
and sampling to available reference points, but
we will not survey, set, or check the accuracy of
those points unless we accept that duty in
writing. Locations of field observations or
sampling described in our report or shown on
our sketches are based on information
provided by others or estimates made by our
personnel. You agree that such dimensions,
depths, or elevations are approximations unless
specifically stated otherwise in the report. You
accept the inherent risk that samples or
observations may not be representative of
things not sampled or seen and, further, that
site conditions may change over time.
2.4 Our duties do not include supervising your
contractors or commenting on, overseeing, or
providing the means and methods of their
work, unless we accept such duties in writing.
We will not be responsible for the failure of
your contractors to perform in accordance with
their undertakings, and the providing of our
services will not relieve others of their
responsibilities to you or to others.
2.5 We will provide a health and safety
program for our employees, but we will not be
responsible for contractor, job, or site health or
safety unless we accept that duty in writing.
2.6 You will provide, at no cost to us,
appropriate site safety measures as to work
areas to be observed or inspected by us. Our
employees are authorized by you to refuse to
work under conditions that may be unsafe.
2.7 Estimates of our fees or other project
costs will be based on information available to
us and on our experience and knowledge. Such
estimates are an exercise of our professional
judgment and are not guaranteed or
warranted. Actual costs may vary. You should
allow a contingency in addition to estimated
costs.
Section 3: Your Responsibilities
3.1 You will provide us with prior
geotechnical and other reports, specifications,
plans, and information to which you have
access about the site. You agree to provide us
with all plans, changes in plans, and new
information as to site conditions until we have
completed our work.
3.2 You will provide access to the site. In the
course of our work some site damage is normal
even when due care is exercised. We will use
reasonable care to minimize damage to the
site. We have not included the cost of
restoration of normal damage in the estimated
charges.
3.3 You agree to provide us, in a timely
manner, with information that you have
regarding buried objects at the site. We will not
be responsible for locating buried objects at the
site unless we accept that duty in writing. You
agree to hold us harmless from claims,
damages, losses, and related expenses
involving buried objects that were not properly
marked or identified or of which you had
knowledge but did not timely call to our
attention or correctly show on the plans you or
others on your behalf furnished to us.
3.4 You will notify us of any knowledge or
suspicion of the presence of hazardous or
dangerous materials in a sample provided to us.
You agree to provide us with information in
your possession or control relating to
contamination at the work site. If we observe
or suspect the presence of contaminants not
anticipated in our Agreement, we may
terminate our work without liability to you or
to others, and we will be paid for the services
we have provided.
3.5 Neither this Agreement nor the providing
of services will operate to make us an owner,
operator, generator, transporter, treater,
storer, or a disposal facility within the meaning
of the Resource Conservation Recovery Act, as
amended, or within the meaning of any other
law governing the handling, treatment, storage,
or disposal of hazardous materials. You agree
to hold us harmless and indemnify us from any
such claim or loss.
3.6 Monitoring wells are your property, and
you are responsible for their permitting,
maintenance, and abandonment unless we
accept that duty in writing.
3.7 You agree to make disclosures required by
law. In the event you do not own the site, you
acknowledge that it is your duty to inform the
owner of the discovery or release of
contaminants at the site. You agree to hold us
harmless and indemnify us from claims related
to disclosures made by us that are required by
law and from claims related to the informing or
failure to inform the site owner of the discovery
of contaminants.
Section 4: Reports and Records
4.1 Unless you request otherwise, we will
provide our report in an electronic format.
4.2 Our reports, notes, calculations, and other
documents and our computer software and
data are instruments of our service to you, and
they remain our property but are subject to a
license to you for your use in the related
project for the purposes disclosed to us. You
may not transfer our reports to others or use
them for a purpose for which they were not
prepared without our written approval. You
agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from
claims, damages, losses, and expenses,
including attorney fees, arising out of such a
transfer or use. At your request, we will provide
endorsements of our reports or letters of
reliance, but only if the recipients agree to be
bound by the terms of our agreement with you
and only if we are paid the administrative fee
stated in our then current Schedule of Charges.
4.3 Because electronic documents may be
modified intentionally or inadvertently, you
agree that we will not be liable for damages
resulting from change in an electronic
document occurring after we transmit it to you.
4.4 If you do not pay for our services in full as
agreed, we may retain work not yet delivered
to you and you agree to return to us all of our
work that is in your possession or under your
control.
4.5 Samples and field data remaining after
tests are conducted and field and laboratory
equipment that cannot be adequately cleansed
of contaminants are and continue to be your
property. They may be discarded or returned to
GC Revised 9/1/2013 Page 2 of 2
you, at our discretion, unless within 15 days of
the report date you give us written direction to
store or transfer the materials at your expense.
4.6 Electronic data, reports, photographs,
samples and other materials provided by you or
others may be discarded or returned to you, at
our discretion, unless within 15 days of the
report date you give us written direction to
store or transfer the materials at your expense.
Section 5: Compensation
5.1 You will pay for services as agreed upon
or according to our then current Schedule of
Charges if there is no other written agreement
as to price. An estimated cost is not a firm
figure. You agree to pay all sales taxes and
other taxes based on your payment of our
compensation. Our performance is subject to
credit approval and payment of any specified
retainer.
5.2 You will notify us of billing disputes within
15 days. You will pay undisputed portions of
invoices on receipt. You agree to pay interest
on unpaid balances beginning 30 days after
invoice dates at the rate of 1.5% per month, or
at the maximum rate allowed by law.
5.3 If you direct us to invoice another, we will
do so, but you agree to be responsible for our
compensation unless you provide us with that
person's written acceptance of all terms of our
Agreement and we agree to extend credit to
that person and to release you.
5.4 Your obligation to pay for our services
under this Agreement is not contingent on your
ability to obtain financing, governmental or
regulatory agency approval, permits, final
adjudication of lawsuit in which we are not
involved, your successful completion of a
project, receipt of payment from another, or
any other event. No retainage will be withheld.
5.5 If you do not pay us within 60 days of
invoice date, you agree to reimburse our
expenses, including but not limited to attorney
fees, staff time, and other costs of collection.
5.6 You agree to compensate us in
accordance with our fee schedule if we are
asked or required to respond to legal process
arising out of a proceeding related to the
project and as to which we are not a party.
5.7 If we are delayed by factors beyond our
control, or if project conditions or the scope or
amount of work change, or if changed labor
union conditions result in increased costs,
decreased efficiency, or delays, or if the
standards or methods change, we will give you
timely notice and we will receive an equitable
adjustment of our compensation. If you and we
do not reach agreement on such compensation
within 30 days of our written application, we
may terminate without liability to you or
others.
5.8 If you fail to pay us within 60 days
following invoice date, we may consider the
default a total breach of our Agreement and, at
our option, terminate our duties without
liability to you or to others.
5.9 In consideration of our providing
insurance to cover claims made by you, you
hereby waive any right of offset as to fees
otherwise due us.
Section 6: Disputes, Damage, and Risk
Allocation
6.1 Each of us will exercise good faith efforts
to resolve disputes without litigation. Such
efforts will include, but not be limited to, a
meeting(s) attended by each party’s
representative(s) empowered to resolve the
dispute. Before either of us commences an
action against the other, disputes (except
collections) will be submitted to mediation.
6.2 Neither of us will be liable for special,
incidental, consequential, or punitive damages,
including but not limited to those arising from
delay, loss of use, loss of profits or revenue,
loss of financing commitments or fees, or the
cost of capital.
6.3 We will not be liable for damages unless
suit is commenced within two years of the date
of injury or loss or within two years of the date
of substantial completion of our services,
whichever is earlier. We will not be liable unless
you have notified us of the discovery of the
claimed breach of contract, negligent act, or
omission within 30 days of the date of
discovery and unless you have given us an
opportunity to investigate and to recommend
ways of mitigating damages. You agree not to
make a claim against us unless you have
provided us at least 30 days prior to the
institution of any legal proceeding against us
with a written certificate executed by an
appropriately licensed professional specifying
and certifying each and every act or omission
that you contend constitutes a violation of the
standard of care governing our professional
services.
6.4 For you to obtain the benefit of a fee
which includes a reasonable allowance for risks,
you agree that our aggregate liability for all
claims will not exceed the fee paid for our
services or $50,000, whichever is greater. If you
are unwilling to accept this allocation of risk,
we will increase our aggregate liability to
$100,000 provided that, within 10 days of the
date of our Agreement, you provide payment in
an amount that will increase our fees by 10%,
but not less than $500, to compensate us for
the greater risk undertaken. This increased fee
is not the purchase of insurance.
6.5 You agree to indemnify us from all liability
to others in excess of the risk allocation stated
above and to insure this obligation.
6.6 The prevailing party in any action relating
to this Agreement shall be entitled to recover
its costs and expenses, including reasonable
attorney fees, staff time, and expert witness
fees.
6.7 The law of the state in which our servicing
office is located will govern all disputes. Each of
us waives trial by jury. No officer or employee
acting within the scope of employment shall
have individual liability for his or her acts or
omissions, and you agree not to make a claim
against individual employees.
Section 7: General Indemnification
7.1 We will indemnify and hold you harmless
from and against demands, damages, and
expenses of others to the comparative extent
they are caused by our negligent acts or
omissions or those negligent acts or omissions
of persons for whom we are legally responsible.
You will indemnify and hold us harmless from
and against demands, damages, and expenses
of others to the comparative extent they are
caused by your negligent acts or omissions or
those negligent acts or omissions of persons for
whom you are legally responsible.
7.2 To the extent it may be necessary to
indemnify either of us under Section 7.1, you
and we expressly waive, in favor of the other
only, any immunity or exemption from liability
that exists under any worker compensation
law.
7.3 You agree to indemnify us against losses
and costs arising out of claims of patent or
copyright infringement as to any process or
system that is specified or selected by you or by
others on your behalf.
Section 8: Miscellaneous Provisions
8.1 We will provide a certificate of insurance
to you upon request. Any claim as an Additional
Insured shall be limited to losses caused by our
sole negligence.
8.2 You and we, for ourselves and our
insurers, waive all claims and rights of
subrogation for losses arising out of causes of
loss covered by our respective insurance
policies.
8.3 Neither of us will assign nor transfer any
interest, any claim, any cause of action, or any
right against the other. Neither of us will assign
or otherwise transfer or encumber any
proceeds or expected proceeds or
compensation from the project or project
claims to any third person, whether directly or
as collateral or otherwise.
8.4 Our Agreement may be terminated early
only in writing. We will receive an equitable
adjustment of our compensation in the event
of early termination.
8.5 If a provision of this Agreement is invalid
or illegal, all other provisions shall remain in full
force and effect.
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.L.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
Item Activity:
Subject:Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016 Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Review and approve the Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016.
INTRODUCTION:
The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the May 4, 2016 Traffic Safety Report at their May 19
meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016
Draft Minutes ETC, May 19, 2016
Photo : 54th Street, looking west towards Minnehaha Avenue
July 21, 2016
Mayor and City Council
Joe Totten, Traffic Safety Coordinator
Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016
Information / Background:
The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 4. The City Engineer,
Assistant City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, Transportation Planner and Police
Lieutenant were in attendance for this meeting.
For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have
been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if
they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included
on the May 19 Edina Transportation Commission and the June 21 City Council meeting agendas.
Section A : Items on which staff recommends approval
A1. Request for moving 54th Street’s westbound stop sign at Minnehaha Boulevard closer to the roadway
Existing Conditions, and Concerns –
• 54th Street has an all way stop at Minnehaha Boulevard.
• The requestor believes that stopping rates are too low,
and the rate of speed through the intersection too high.
The requestor further mentions pedestrian safety as a
primary reason for this request.
• The stop sign is placed 18 feet from the dashed line of the
advisory bike lane
o There is an advisory bike lane, a small boulevard,
and a sidewalk between the sign and the dashed
line of the advisory bike lane.
o The advisory bike lane is extra wide in this
location, as the parking lane ends and a slight
taper in the curb line exists, this makes the
advisory bike lane ten feet wide in this location.
Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016 Page 2
Map : 54th Street, at Minnehaha Avenue
Photo : Alden Drive, looking south towards Morningside Road
• A motor vehicle is not required to be to the
left of the advisory bike lane, unless passing a
bicyclist riding in the lane.
• Eastbound traffic’s stop sign is offset from the
advisory bike lane’s dashed line by 19 feet.
• One afternoon of monitoring the sign showed
that of 79 westbound vehicles, only 12 drivers
made full and complete stops, and 8 were
observed as not reducing their speed
sufficiently to observe all other movements at
the intersection. For comparison, eastbound was also observed; with 72 total vehicles 12 came to a
full and complete stop and 5 were observed as not reducing their speed sufficiently to observe all
other movements at the intersection.
• Westbound traffic traveling downhill as it approaches Minnehaha and many drivers were observed
as stopping their vehicle within the intersection.
• Minnehaha Boulevard has an ADT of 500 and 54th Street, an ADT of 2350 from preconstruction
studies in 2012. The 85th-percentile speed on Minnehaha was 26.2 mph, and on 54th Street, was 30.2
mph.
Guidance –
• A stop sign should be placed at least two feet from the edge of the shoulder (face of curb) and are
recommended to be 6-12 feet from the edge of traveled way (where vehicle traffic would travel).
• Full stop sign warrants are attached in Appendix A.
• This intersection does meet warrants for being controlled, but not for all-way stop control.
After review, staff determined that the stop sign was placed far from the road, and
recommended moving it between the sidewalk and the road, about 6 feet closer to the
roadway. Eastbound traffic was also considered by the committee and a further investigation
will consider if placement of a ‘Stop Ahead’ sign (W3-1) is appropriate for the eastbound
direction.
A2. Request for Share The Road signage on Wooddale Avenue, where southbound bike lane ends
Current Conditions and Concern
• Southbound Wooddale Avenue bike lanes
end at the intersection of Wooddale and 56th
Street.
• Sharrows and shared lanes continue south
from the end of the bike lane to Valley View
Road.
• At 7 other locations, a Bicycle sign (W11-1)
and accompanying Share The Road plaque
(W16-1) is placed shortly after the end of
the bicycle lanes. At 8 locations, a bike lane
ends sign is all that is placed at the end of
such facilities. 4 facilities end with no signage.
• No such signage exists on Wooddale
Avenue, but a Bike Lane Ends sign does exist
at the cessation of the bike lane.
• Wooddale Avenue is seen as having 3570 ADT and an 85th-percentile speed of 33.8 mph in a 2015
study near this location.
Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016 Page 3
Map : Bush Lake Road at Edina Industrial Boulevard
• Wooddale Avenue has 207.5 bicyclists per day at its intersection with 54th Street, north of the bike
lane’s end, per the 2015 Bike and Ped counts.
After review, staff determined that the City of Edina standard should be expanded throughout
the city, and ‘Share The Road’ signage should be placed on the next sign post following that
shown in the photo.
A3. Request for striping southbound Bush Lake Road at Edina Industrial Boulevard for two southbound lanes,
one right turn and one left turn
Current Conditions and Concerns
• This request is a treatment advised in the Traffic Impact Study of the Edina Public School’s
Transportation Facility.
• Southbound Bush Lake Road has 29 feet dedicated to one lane.
• In a 45 minute interval during rush hour 326
vehicles used the southbound approach.
o During this observation, 25 drivers
positioned their vehicles centrally in
the lane, making the wide section
function as one lane.
o 17 vehicles in total were delayed in
reaching the intersection due to a
queue behind a vehicle using the full
lane.
• Other observations of the intersection
include the following:
o One common action for drivers whose vehicles use the full lane include turning right from
central in the lane, or the left hand side of the lane.
o Larger vehicles, from heavy duty pickups to box trucks and semis, are more likely to use the
full lane.
• The queue reached a distance of approximately 300 feet during peak times, drivers were two wide
during this queuing.
After review, staff recommends placement of this stripe to encourage use of the intersection
with two lanes. The lanes should be right-turn only and a shared left-turn and through lane to
optimize flow at the stop controlled intersection. The line should extend at least 300’ north of
the intersection to accommodate long queues.
Section B: Items which staff recommends for no action
B1. Request for temporary speed bump placement due to Tracy Avenue closures
Current Conditions and Concerns
• Neighbors on local streets around Tracy Avenue’s closure have called requesting temporary speed
bumps to lessen the speed of traffic, and discourage traffic from using the neighborhood to detour
around Tracy Avenue instead of the marked detour.
• Other options for reducing the through use of the streets, as well as keeping speeds down are
welcome.
• Reasons for this request vary, with vehicle safety, pedestrian safety, bicycling safety, use of property
safely, the wear on the roads, and the undesirability of living on a major throughway having been
cited.
Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016 Page 4
Map : Concerns have been fielded from resident regarding
Valley View Road, Ridgeway Road, Westridge Boulevad,
Crescent Drive, Hansen Road and Maddox Lane.
• Counts taken in 2011 show Ridgeway Road had an ADT of approximately 120 and an 85th-percentile
speed of 26.4 mph.
o Counts taken this year show Ridgeway
Road has 1010 ADT and an 85th-
percentile speed of 27.7 mph, and 53
drivers exceeding the speed limit per
day.
• Counts taken in 2011 show Westridge
Boulevard had an ADT of 280 and an 85th-
percentile speed of 26.8 mph.
o Counts taken this year show
Westridge Boulevard has an ADT of
2550 and an 85th-percentile speed of
28.7 mph, and 187 drivers exceeding
the speed limit in an 18 hour period
before a tube broke and made the
speeds gathered unreliable.
• Other information was gathered on Hansen
Road, and Valley View Road. A radar study on
Hansen Road showed an 85th-percentile speed
of 33 mph, and general observations indicate
clear increase in volume.
After review, staff determined that,
while the increase in traffic and speed on
these roadways is uncomfortable, the
limited resources for temporary traffic
control make it impossible to make drivers treat area residents with the respect they
are asking for. Further, the official detour route for Tracy Avenue is Gleason Road and
Vernon Avenue, and the intersection of these streets is unable to handle the flow of
traffic. Therefore, these unofficial detours must absorb more traffic.
Section D: Other items handled by Traffic Safety
D1. Various calls were received, with concerns about construction closures, detours and signage.
• 70th Street had many people entering a work zone near the roundabout, passing three different road
closed local traffic only signs on type III barricades. This resulted in dangerous situations, including
many drivers going the wrong way through the 70th Street and Valley View Road roundabout.
Enforcement and further signage were implemented in conjunction with Centerpoint Energy and
their contactors, to protect workers and the traveling public.
• A person was ticketed for entering the 70th Street work zone, and was angered that signage was
increased after his ticket was written. It was explained that the original signage followed proper
guidance from the FHWA and MNMUTCD, and that any further concerns should be sent to the
police department, or Centerpoint Energy and their contractors.
• Tracy Avenue construction had many people driving through the work zone, enforcement was
increased, and signage changed in conjunction with Centerpoint Energy and their contractors, to
ensure worker safety.
• Tracy Avenue at Vernon Avenue had a type III barricade and signage in the bicycle lane, indicating
that the road was closed to through traffic, and informing drivers of the detour. A requestor
believed this signage was too big, and created too narrow a drive lane on Tracy Avenue at Vernon
Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016 Page 5
Avenue. The signage was seen to extend into the travel lane by less than 2 feet, and still provided
enough space for cautious movement of traffic. No action was taken.
• A resident believed that drivers were trying to access Trunk Highway 100 from a local, dead-end
street when the entrances to northbound 100 from 50th Street were closed. The ramps reopened,
and the requestor did not ask for further study or enforcement.
• Gleason Road and the Trunk Highway 62 ramps were requested for construction specific stop signs,
to alleviate construction congestion. This request was redirected to MnDOT and Hennepin County,
who have previously studied stop signs and signalization in this location.
• A resident asked for a construction specific speed limit on 70th Street for the Nine Mile Creek
Regional Trail construction workers. This request was not seconded by the contractor building the
trail, and was not pursued further.
• Requestors noted changes in signage needed to be made for Trunk Highway 100 detours, as the
signage in place was out of date, this request was forwarded to MnDOT.
• A request for additional signage for the Centerpoint Energy detours on Tracy Avenue and Olinger
Boulevard, including directions to the Colonial Church, was received. This request was specific to
funeral services happening on April 30th. Centerpoint Energy and their contractors placed the
signage when informed of the request.
• Southbound Trunk Highway 100 ramps at Benton Avenue were seeing large delays due to
construction activities on Trunk Highway 100 and Tracy Avenue. MnDOT and the City of Edina are
continuing observation of this intersection, to determine if an all-way stop should be implemented
during construction activities.
D2. A request for more safety from current stop sign running at Valley Lane and Creek Drive was received,
this item was considered on the March 02, 2016 Traffic Safety Report and the requestor did not wish to
pursue it further.
D3. A road rage incident was reported after the fact, with speeds on 66th Street-over the Lake Cornelia
isthmus-being of particular concern. The driver reported traveling 32 miles-per-hour, but was passed and
harassed by the offending driver. Not enough information was available to pursue this specific instance, but
the police department was forwarded the message, as a request to maintain and increase enforcement in
this area.
D4. A resident had speed concerns on West Shore Drive, south of 70th Street, specifically near Gilford
Drive. A tube counter was placed at the site and speed data was forwarded to the police department for
targeted enforcement. The resident was also sent a copy of the speed report.
D5. A resident had speed concerns on Benton Avenue, between Hansen and Trunk Highway 100. A tube
counter was placed, and speed data was forwarded to the police department for targeted enforcement. The
resident was also sent a copy of the speed report. Benton Avenue is due for a reconstruction, but is
currently outside of the City of Edina’s 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan. During a reconstruction, traffic
calming devices, and non-motorized facilities may be considered.
Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016 Page 6
Appendix A:
Stop Sign Warrants
When it is determined that a full stop is always required on an approach to an intersection a STOP (R1-1)
sign shall be used.
At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using
less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs.
The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment
indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions:
A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day;
B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting
traffic on the through street or highway.
C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction with the
installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such
crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving
road users from the minor street failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or
highway.
Additional warrants which do not specify the type of control are as follows;
A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of way
rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law;
B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or
C. An un-signalized intersection in a signalized area.
In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets
or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the
following conditions exist:
A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches
averages more the 2,000 units per day.
B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield
in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or
C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way rule
have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported
within a 2-year period.
Additional warrants from the city of Edina list that:
1. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs
should be considered.
2. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight
obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign.
3. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted
speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street.
4. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be
considered.
5. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed.
6. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
1
Minutes
City of Edina, Minnesota
Transportation Commission
Community Room
May 19, 6:00 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Chair LaForce called the meeting to order.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call were members Boettge, Brown, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Miranda, Olson and Ruehl. Absent at
roll call were members Bass, Ding and Loeffelholz.
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion was made by member Olson and seconded by member Boettge approving the meeting agenda. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion was made by member Brown and seconded by member Olson approving the edited Apr. 21, 2016,
minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried.
VII. Reports/Recommendations
E. Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016
A.1. Member Janovy said she was concerned with installing a sign in such a narrow boulevard. She
suggested using a stop bar but planner Nolan said stop bars are inconclusive at this time as they are still
being studied.
D.1. Member Janovy said better communication is needed with the public. Planner Nolan said a staff is
dedicated to Centerpoint Energy and the City does press releases. Member Iyer said Street Closures
could be added to Edina To Go. Planner Nolan said staff is working on mapping Street Closures. Member
Janovy suggested communications department doing a press release that lists how to sign up for Street
Closure information and where to find information on the City’s website.
Motion was made by member Boettge and seconded by member Miranda to forward the
May 4, 2016, Traffic Safety Report to City Council.
Boettge, Brown, Iyer, LaForce, Miranda, and Olson voted aye.
Janovy voted nay.
Motion carried.
XII. Adjournment at 8:25 p.m.
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.M.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No. 2016-66 Approving Cooperative
Construction Agreement With Department of
Transportation
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Resolution No. 2016-66 authorizing Mayor and City Manager to sign the Cooperative Construction
Agreement with State of Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for construction of a noise wall along
and adjacent to Highway 100 from east of Interlachen Boulevard to Minnehaha Creek.
INTRODUCTION:
Recall on May 19, 2015, a public hearing was held and City Council approved construction of this noise wall for
construction in 2016 by MnDOT. The location of the wall was previously referred to as Minnehaha Creek to Vernon
Avenue.
The wood noise wall designed by MnDOT will be constructed in Highway 100’s right-of-way. Based on MnDOT’s
noise wall policy, MnDOT will fund 90% of the cost and the remaining 10% ($91,206.38) will be assessed to adjacent
properties that will benefit from the construction of the wall. The special assessment will be divided on a 3-tier level with
assessments ranging from approximately $1,000-$3,000.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Resolution No. 2016-66
Cooperative Construction Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-66
APPROVING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
CITY OF EDINA
COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into MnDOT Agreement No. 1003022 with the State
of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes:
To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City’s share of the costs of the
noise wall construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along
and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 100 from 250 feet East of Interlachen Boulevard to
Minnehaha Creek within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 2734-51 (T. H.
100-130).
IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute the
Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement.
Dated: June 21, 2016
Attest:___________________________ _________________________________
Debra A. Mangen James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
June 21, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of _____________, 20___.
____________________________________
City Clerk
MnDOT Contract No: 1003022
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
And
CITY OF EDINA
COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT
State Project Number (S.P.): 2734-51 Estimated Amount Receivable
Trunk Highway Number (T.H.): 100=130 $91,206.38
This Agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ("State") and
City of Edina acting through its City Council ("City").
Recitals
1. The State will perform noise wall construction and other associated construction upon, along and adjacent to
Trunk Highway No. 100 from 250 feet East of Interlachen Boulevard to Minnehaha Creek in Edina according
to State-prepared plans, specifications and special provisions designated by the State as State Project
No. 2734-51 (T.H. 100=130) ("Project"); and
2. The State has requested the City to participate in its Project noise wall construction; and
3. The City wishes to participate in the costs of the noise wall construction and associated construction
engineering; and
4. Minnesota Statutes § 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make
arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing,
maintaining and improving the trunk highway system.
Agreement
1. Term of Agreement; Survival of Terms; Plans; Incorporation of Exhibits
1.1. Effective Date. This Agreement will be effective on the date the State obtains all signatures required by
Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subdivision 2.
1.2. Expiration Date. This Agreement will expire when all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled.
1.3. Survival of Terms. All clauses which impose obligations continuing in their nature and which must survive
in order to give effect to their meaning will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement,
including, without limitation, the following clauses: 3. Noise Wall Maintenance by the City; 8. Liability;
Worker Compensation Claims; 10. State Audits; 11. Government Data Practices; 12. Governing Law;
Jurisdiction; Venue; and 14. Force Majeure.
1.4. Plans, Specifications, Special Provisions. Plans, specifications and special provisions designated by the
State as State Project No. 2734-51 (T.H. 100=130) are on file in the office of the Commissioner of
Transportation at St. Paul, Minnesota, and incorporated into this Agreement by reference. ("Project Plans")
1.5. Exhibits. Preliminary SCHEDULE "I" is on file in the office of the City Director of Engineering and
incorporated into this Agreement by reference.
2. Construction by the State
2.1. Contract Award. The State will advertise for bids and award a construction contract to the lowest
responsible bidder according to the Project Plans.
-1-
Receivable Standard (Municipal Agreements)
MnDOT Contract No: 1003022
2.2. Direction, Supervision and Inspection of Construction.
A. Supervision and Inspection by the State. The State will direct and supervise all construction activities
performed under the construction contract, and perform all construction engineering and inspection
functions in connection with the contract construction. All contract construction will be performed
according to the Project Plans.
B. Inspection by the City. The City participation construction covered under this Agreement will be open to
inspection by the City. If the City believes the City participation construction covered under this
Agreement has not been properly performed or that the construction is defective, the City will inform the
State District Engineer's authorized representative in writing of those defects. Any recommendations
made by the City are not binding on the State. The State will have the exclusive right to determine
whether the State's contractor has satisfactorily performed the City participation construction covered
under this Agreement.
2.3. Plan Changes, Additional Construction, Etc.
A. The State will make changes in the Project Plans and contract construction, which may include the City
participation construction covered under this Agreement, and will enter into any necessary addenda,
change orders and supplemental agreements with the State's contractor that are necessary to cause the
contract construction to be performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. The State District
Engineer's authorized representative will inform the appropriate City official of any proposed addenda,
change orders and supplemental agreements to the construction contract that will affect the City
participation construction covered under this Agreement.
B. The City may request additional work or changes to the work in the plans as part of the construction
contract. Such request will be made by an exchange of letter(s) with the State. If the State determines
that the requested additional work or plan changes are necessary or desirable and can be accommodated
without undue disruption to the project, the State will cause the additional work or plan changes to be
made.
2.4. Satisfactory Completion of Contract. The State will perform all other acts and functions necessary to cause
the construction contract to be completed in a satisfactory manner.
3. Noise Wall Maintenance by the City
Upon completion of the project, the City will provide maintenance of the non-highway side of any noise wall
construction without cost or expense to the State. Maintenance includes vegetation control, graffiti removal on
the non-highway side and any other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the walls in a safe, usable and
aesthetically acceptable condition.
4. Basis of City Cost
4.1. SCHEDULE "I". The Preliminary SCHEDULE "I" includes all anticipated City participation construction
items and the construction engineering cost share covered under this Agreement, and is based on engineer's
estimated unit prices.
4.2. City Participation Construction. The City will participate at rate of 10 Percent in all of the noise wall
construction. The construction includes the City's proportionate share of item costs for mobilization and
traffic control.
4.3. Construction Engineering Costs. The City will pay a construction engineering charge equal to 8 percent of
the total City participation construction covered under this Agreement.
4.4. Plan Changes, Additional Construction, Etc. The City will share in the costs of construction contract
addenda, change orders and supplemental agreements that are necessary to complete the City participation
construction covered under this Agreement, including any City requested additional work and plan changes.
-2-
Receivable Standard (Municipal Agreements)
MnDOT Contract No: 1003022
The State reserves the right to invoice the City for the cost of any additional City requested work and plan
changes, construction contract addenda, change orders and supplemental agreements, and associated
construction engineering before the completion of the contract construction.
5. City Cost and Payment by the City
5.1. City Cost. $91,206.38 is the City's estimated share of the costs of the contract construction, and the 8 percent
construction engineering cost share as shown in the Preliminary SCHEDULE "I". The Preliminary
SCHEDULE "I" was prepared using estimated quantities and unit prices, and may include any credits or
lump sum costs. Upon award of the construction contract, the State will prepare a Revised SCHEDULE "I"
based on construction contract unit prices, which will replace and supersede the Preliminary SCHEDULE
"I" as part of this agreement.
5.2. Conditions of Payment. The City will pay the State the City's total estimated construction and construction
engineering cost share, as shown in the Revised SCHEDULE "I", after the following conditions have been
met:
A. Execution of this Agreement and transmittal to the City, including a copy of the Revised SCHEDULE
B. The City's receipt of a written request from the State for the advancement of funds.
5.3. Acceptance of the City's Cost and Completed Construction. The computation by the State of the amount
due from the City will be final, binding and conclusive. Acceptance by the State of the completed contract
construction will be final, binding and conclusive upon the City as to the satisfactory completion of the
contract construction.
5.4. Final Payment by the City. Upon completion of all contract construction and upon computation of the final
amount due the State's contractor, the State will prepare a Final SCHEDULE "I" and submit a copy to the
City. The Final SCHEDULE "I" will be based on final quantities, and include all City participation
construction items and the construction engineering cost share covered under this Agreement. If the final
cost of the City participation construction exceeds the amount of funds advanced by the City, the City will
pay the difference to the State without interest. If the final cost of the City participation construction is less
than the amount of funds advanced by the City, the State will refund the difference to the City without
interest.
The State and the City waive claims for any payments or refunds less than $5.00 according to Minnesota
Statutes § 15.415.
6. Authorized Representatives
Each party's Authorized Representative is responsible for administering this Agreement and is authorized to give
and receive any notice or demand required or permitted by this Agreement.
6.1. The State's Authorized Representative will be:
Name/Title: Maryanne Kelly-Sonnek, Municipal Agreements Engineer (or successor)
Address: 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mailstop 682, St. Paul, MN 55155
Telephone: (651) 366-4634
E-Mail: maryanne.kellysonnek@state.mn.us
6.2. The City's Authorized Representative will be:
Name/Title: Chad Millner, Director of Engineering, City of Edina (or successor)
Address: 7450 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439
Telephone: (952) 826-0318
E-Mail: cmillner@EdinaMN.gov
-3-
Receivable Standard (Municipal Agreements)
MnDOT Contract No: 1003022
7. Assignment; Amendments; Waiver; Contract Complete
7.1. Assignment. Neither party may assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this Agreement without the
prior consent of the other party and a written assignment agreement, executed and approved by the same
parties who executed and approved this Agreement, or their successors in office.
7.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has
been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or
their successors in office.
7.3. Waiver. If a party fails to enforce any provision of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision
or the party's right to subsequently enforce it.
7.4. Contract Complete. This Agreement contains all prior negotiations and agreements between the State and
the City. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind
either party.
8. Liability; Worker Compensation Claims
8.1. Each party is responsible for its own acts, omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law
and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of others and the results thereof. Minnesota Statutes
§ 3.736 and other applicable law govern liability of the State. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other
applicable law govern liability of the City.
8.2. Each party is responsible for its own employees for any claims arising under the Workers Compensation
Act.
9. Nondiscrimination
Provisions of Minnesota Statutes § 181.59 and of any applicable law relating to civil rights and discrimination are
considered part of this Agreement.
10. State Audits
Under Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, subdivision 5, the City's books, records, documents, and accounting
procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the State and the State Auditor
or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this Agreement.
11. Government Data Practices
The City and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter
13, as it applies to all data provided under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received,
stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the City under this Agreement. The civil remedies of Minnesota
Statutes §13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the City or the State.
12. Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue
Minnesota law governs the validity, interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. Venue for all legal
proceedings arising out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with
competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota.
13. Termination; Suspension
13.1. By Mutual Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated by mutual agreement of the parties.
13.2. Termination for Insufficient Funding. The State may immediately terminate this Agreement if it does not
obtain funding from the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source; or if funding cannot be continued at
a level sufficient to allow for the performance of contract construction under the Project. Termination must
be by written or fax notice to the City.
-4-
Receivable Standard (Municipal Agreements)
MnDOT Contract No: 1003022
13.3. Suspension. In the event of a total or partial government shutdown, the State may suspend this Agreement
and all work, activities and performance of work authorized through this Agreement.
14. Force Majeure
Neither party will be responsible to the other for a failure to perform under this Agreement (or a delay in
performance), if such failure or delay is due to a force majeure event. A force majeure event is an event beyond a
party's reasonable control, including but not limited to, unusually severe weather, fire, floods, other acts of God,
labor disputes, acts of war or terrorism, or public health emergencies.
[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
-5-
Receivable Standard (Municipal Agreements)
MnDOT Contract No: 1003022
CITY OF EDINA
The undersigned certify that they have lawfully
executed this contract on behalf of the Governmental
Unit as required by applicable charter provisions,
resolutions or ordinances.
By:
Title:
Date:
By:
Title:
Date:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Recommended for Approval:
By:
(District Engineer)
Date:
Approved:
By:
(State Design Engineer)
Date:
COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION
By:
(With delegated authority)
Date:
INCLUDE COPY OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING ITS
EXECUTION.
-6-
Receivable Standard (Municipal Agreements)
mc;J-7
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-xx
APPROVING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
CITY OF EDINA
COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into MnDOT Agreement No. 1003022 with the State
of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes:
To provide for payment by the City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the
noise wall construction and other associated construction to be performed upon, along
and adjacent to Trunk Highway No. 100 from 250 feet East of Interlachen Boulevard to
Minnehaha Creek within the corporate City limits under State Project No. 2734-51 (T. H.
100-130).
IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute the
Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement.
Dated: June 21, 2016
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
June 21, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 .
City Clerk
CITY COST PARTICIPATION
From Sheet No. 2 through 3 84,450.35
Subtotal $84,450.35
Construction Engineering (8%) 6,756.03
) Total City Cost $91,206.38
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE "I"
Agreement No. 1003022
City of Edina
S.P. 2734-51 (T.H. 100=130) Preliminary: April 20, 2016
State Funds
Noise wall construction to start approximately September 06, 2016 under
State Contract No. with
located on TH 100 from 250 feet East of Interlachen Boulevard to Minnehaha Creek in Edina
(1) Amount of advance payment as described in Article 5.2 of the agreement (Estimated amount
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award. - 1 -
(1) 90% STATE, 10% CITY
P = PLAN OUANTITY 1003022
ITEM
NUMBER
S.P. 2734-51
WORK ITEM
UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
(1)
2011.601 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING LUMP SUM 1.00 $1,440.00 $1,440.00
2011.601 AS BUILT LUMP SUM 1.00 $255.00 $255.00
2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 0.94 $20,000.00 $18,800.00
2051.501 MAINT AND RESTORATION OF HAUL ROADS LUMP SUM 1.00 $884.54 $884.54
2101.501 CLEARING (P) ACRE 0.50 $3,492.86 $1,746.43
2101.502 CLEARING TREE 10.00 $194.38 $1,943.80
2104.501 REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 1,617.00 $4.34 $7,017.78
2104.523 SALVAGE SIGN TYPE C EACH 4.00 $36.29 $145.16
2401.501 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (IG52) CU YD 32.00 $412.01 $13,184.32
2422.603 CONCRETE POSTS 12"X18" LIN FT 6,536.00 $53.26 $348,107.36
2422.603 CONCRETE POSTS 12"X20" LIN FT 260.00 $80.00 $20,800.00
2422.618 WOOD NOISE ATTENUATOR WALL SQ FT 33,060.00 $11.00 $363,660.00
2422.618 WOOD NOISE BARRIER SQ FT 48.00 $10.09 $484.32
2451.513 FINE FILTER AGGREGATE (CV) (P) CU YD 311.00 $23.76 $7,389.36
2533.507 PORTABLE PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER DESIGN 8337 LIN FT 515.00 $15.20 $7,828.00
2554.615 IMPACT ATTENUATOR ASSEMBLY 1.00 $2,733.40 $2,733.40
2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 0.94 $20,000.00 $18,800.00
2563.601 ALTERNATE PEDESTRIAN ROUTE LUMP SUM 1.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
2563.602 MEDIAN BARRIER DELINEATOR ONE-WAY TEMPORARY EACH 18.00 $8.25 $148.50
2564.537 INSTALL SIGN TYPE C EACH 4.00 $151.07 $604.28
2572.501 TEMPORARY FENCE LIN FT 88.00 $1.93 $169.84
2572.505 PRUNE TREES HOUR 8.00 $95.55 $764.40
2573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 8.00 $175.21 $1,401.68
2573.533 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE COMPOST LIN FT 1,242.00 $2.58 $3,204.36
2573.535 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT LUMP SUM 1.00 $5,763.08 $5,763.08
2573.550 EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR LUMP SUM 1.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
2575.545 WEED SPRAYING ACRE 0.80 $29.24 $23.39
2575.547 WEED SPRAY MIXTURE GALLON 0.40 $22.17 $8.87
2575.555 TURF ESTABLISHMENT LUMP SUM 1.00 $7,476.59 $7,476.59
2575.571 RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 M GALLON 4.00 $391.80 $1,567.20
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award. - 2 -
ITEM
NUMBER
S.P. 2734-51
WORK ITEM
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE COST
(1)
UNIT
RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4
REMOVABLE PREFORMED PAVEMENT MARKING TAPE
REMOVABLE PREFORMED PLASTIC MASK (BLACK)
2575.572
2581.501
2581.603
SQ YD
LIN FT
LIN FT
600.00
173.00
50.00
$1.56
$1.28
$2.28
$269.88
$768.00
$114.00
TOTAL $844,503.54
90% STATE
10% CITY
$760,053.19
$84,450.35
(1) 90% STATE, 10% CITY
1003022
Data is considered Non-public prior to project award. - 3 -
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.N.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works
Item Activity:
Subject:Ordinance No. 2016-10 Amending Chapter 24 of
Edina City Code
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to approve Ordinance No. 2016-10 adopting an amendment to Chapter 24 of Edina City Code. The
motion should include waiver of second reading.
INTRODUCTION:
See attached Staff Report
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Staff Report
Ordinance No. 2016-24 Amending Chapter 24
June 21, 2016
Mayor and Council
Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works
Ordinance No.2016-10 Amending Chapter 24 of the Edina City Code
Information / Background:
In 2015 the Federal Communications Commission enhanced and made changes to their rules
regarding the transmission of 911 calls to increase the accuracy of location information transmitted
with a wireless 911 call. Whereas this change won’t completely correct that issue, it will allow for a
much more accurate location for cell signals.
The City's zoning regulations for communications towers, antenna, and base units are contained in
Chapter 24 of the City ordinance. The current regulations were drafted at a time when antennas
were bulky and bolted to the tops of guyed or lattice towers.
While that kind of "Macrocell" deployment still exists and will continue to exist, there are now a
variety of complementary and alternative technologies that are much smaller. Distributed antenna
system or DAS networks and other "small cell" systems use components that are a fraction of the
size of macrocell deployments, and can be installed on utility poles, buildings.
Currently DAS and small cell networks do not exist on infrastructure in the public right of way in
Edina. In response to these technological advancements the City has received requests to attach
telecommunications antennas to City owned infrastructure within the right of way. In response to
this action, the City Attorney has prepared an ordinance amendment regarding Chapter 24 of Edina
City Code, so that we can better control what is happening within our right of way.
The reasons for the proposed amendment are to remove barriers to fair, reasonable and non-
discriminatory access to available capacity on City owned infrastructure located within public right
of way, to ensure that communication antennas and associated equipment are placed appropriately
and are compatible with surrounding uses, and to do so in an equitable manner consistent with
applicable federal, state, and local laws.
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Federal law limits the review period for telecommunications applications to 150 days, with an even
shorter time of 60 days for collocations. Meeting federally imposed time frames will be made less
burdensome by allowing administrative review for applications that fall within the provisions of the
ordinance.
The amendment seeks to balance the public need for access to reliable telecommunications
infrastructure against the potential adverse effect such infrastructure can have when deployed
without oversight.
The amendment is not expected to create any problems, as all new deployments will be reviewed by
the Director of Public Works and will be subject to development standards intended to address their
visual impact.
Similar to how we hire consultants for providing engineering services within the City, we would
negotiate a Small Cell Master License Agreement with each of the telecommunication companies
and then approve an amendment for each site.
175047v2
186712v1
ORDINANCE NO. 2016-10
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE
CONCERNING RIGHT-OF-WAY MANAGEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 24-49 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following
definitions:
Wireless Telecommunication Facility - equipment used to provide wireless telecommunication
or data services, including all antennas, radios, support devices, equipment including ground
equipment, associated cables, and attachments.
Section 2. Section 24-53 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows:
STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION.
A. GENERAL STANDARDS. The excavation, backfilling, patching restoration and all
other work performed in the right-of-way must be done in conformance with all
applicable Minnesota Rules, including without limitation Minnesota Rules Chapter 7560,
Rules 7819.1100, 7819.5000 and 7819.5100, as well as all of the requirements of this
City Code and its other conditions and requirements in so far as they are not
inconsistent with Minnesota Statutes Sections 237.162 - .163. The permit holder shall
comply with the following standards when performing the work authorized under the
permit:
1. Take such precautions as are necessary to avoid creating unsanitary
conditions. Observe and comply with all laws, rules and regulations of the State
and City.
2. Conduct the operations and perform the work in a manner as to insure the least
obstruction to and interference with traffic.
3. Take precautions to insure the safety of the general public and those who
require access to abutting property.
4. Notify adjoining property owners prior to commencement of work which may
disrupt the use of and access to such adjoining properties.
5. Comply with the Uniform Traffic Manual for Traffic Control at all times during
construction or installation.
6. Exercise caution at all times for the protection of persons, including employees
and property.
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 2
186712v1
7. Protect and identify excavations and work operations with barricade flags and by
warning lights at night.
8. Provide proper trench protection as required by O.S.H.A. when necessary and
depending upon the type of soil, in order to prevent cave-ins endangering life or
tending to enlarge the excavation.
9. Protect the root growth of trees and shrubbery.
10. If possible, provide for space in the installation area for other telecommunication
right-of-way users and other companies which install facilities in public rights-of-
way.
11. Maintain access to all properties and cross streets during construction and
installation, except as allowed by permit, and maintain emergency vehicle access
at all times.
12. Maintain alignment and grade unless otherwise authorized by the City. Changes
not approved by the City will require removal and reconstruction.
13. During plowing or trenching of facilities, a warning tape must also be placed at a
depth of twelve (12) inches above copper cables with over two hundred (200)
pairs and above fiber facilities.
14. Below concrete or bituminous paved road surfaces, directional bore facilities
must be installed in conduit of a type specified in the permit.
15. The placing of all telecommunications facilities must comply with the National
Electric Safety Code, as incorporated by reference in Minnesota Statutes Section
326.243.
16. Locate property lines near right-of-way lines and replace any destroyed property
corners. A Minnesota licensed surveyor must be used.
17. Excavations, trenches and jacking pits off the roadway or adjacent to the
roadway or curbing shall be sheathed and braced depending upon location and
soil stability and as directed by the City.
18. Excavating, trenches and jacking pits shall be protected when unattended to
prevent entrance of surface drainage.
19. All backfilling must be placed in six inch (6") layers at optimum moisture and
compacted with the objective of attaining ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard
Proctor. Compaction shall be accomplished with hand, pneumatic or vibrating
compactors as appropriate.
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 3
186712v1
20. Backfill material shall be subject to the approval of the City Public Works
Director. The City Public Works Director may permit backfilling with the
material from the excavation provided such material is granular in nature and
acceptable to the City Public Works Director.
21. Compacted backfill shall be brought to bottom of the gravel of the approved
street section.
22. Street and pedestrian traffic shall be maintained throughout construction unless
provided otherwise by the permit.
23. No lugs damaging to roadway surfaces may be used.
24. Dirt or debris must be periodically removed during construction.
25. Other reasonable standards and requirements of the City Public Works
Director.
B. STANDARDS FOR INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. The
permit holder shall comply with the following standards when installing facilities
underground:
1. Underground Facilities must be placed as far off the roadway as possible to
provide access from outside of the paved area.
2. Buried facilities shall be at a minimum depth of three (3) feet and a maximum
depth of four (4) feet unless an alternate location is approved in advance by the
City Public Works Director. Buried copper facilities below concrete or
bituminous paved road surfaces must be placed at no less than three (3) feet but
no more than four (4) feet deep. Other buried copper facilities must be placed
at a minimum depth of thirty (30) inches and a maximum depth of four (4) feet.
3. Crossing of streets and hard surfaced driveways shall be directional bored unless
otherwise approved by the City Public Works Director.
4. If construction is open cut, the permit holder must install the visual tracers
within twelve (12) inches and over buried facilities. If other construction
methods are used, substitute location methods will be considered.
5. The permit holder shall register with Gopher State One Call and comply with
the requirements of that system.
6. Compaction in trench shall be ninety-five percent (95%) of Standard Proctor and
copies of test results will be submitted to the City Public Works Director. Tests
will be required at the discretion of the City Public Works Director. Tests must
be conducted by an independent testing firm at locations approved by the City
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 4
186712v1
Public Works Director. Recompaction and new tests will be required if densities
are not met.
7. The facilities shall be located so as to avoid traffic signals and signs which are
generally placed a minimum of four (4) feet behind the curb.
8. When utilizing trenchless installation methods to cross an area in which a
municipal utility is located, and when directed by the City, the permit holder
shall excavate an observation hole over the utility to ensure that the City utility
is not damaged.
9. All junction boxes or access points shall be located no closer than ten (10) feet
from City hydrants, valves, manholes, lift stations or catch basins unless an
alternate location is approved by the City.
10. Underground facilities shall not be installed between a hydrant and an auxiliary
valve.
11. Underground facilities shall not be installed within five (5) feet of hydrants,
valves, lift stations or manholes in areas where utility easements exist beyond the
right-of-way. In those areas in which no utility easement exists, placement of an
underground facility shall be between the edge of pavement and no closer than
three (3) feet to an existing City utility appurtenance unless an alternate location
is approved by the City.
12. Buried telecommunication facilities must have a locating wire or conductive
shield, except for di-electric cables.
13. Buried fiber facilities must be placed in a conduit of a type determined by the
right-of-way user unless the permit holder obtains a waiver from the City.
C. STANDARDS FOR INSTALLATION OF OVERHEAD FACILITIES. When
installing facilities overhead all wires must be a minimum of eighteen (18) feet above
ground and at a location that does not interfere with traffic signals, overhead signs, or
street lights.
D. STANDARDS FOR WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES.
1. Purpose. The City desires high quality wireless communication services to
accommodate the needs of residents and businesses. At the same time, the City
strives to minimize the negative impacts that wireless telecommunication
facilities can have on aesthetics and public safety. Due to the many services that
must be delivered within its limited area, the City also strives to avoid
unnecessary encumbrances within the public right-of-way. The City allows and
regulates wireless telecommunication facilities outside of the public right-of-way
through performance standards and height limits. The purpose of this Article is
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 5
186712v1
to regulate wireless telecommunication facilities within the public right-of-way in
a manner that balances desire for service with aesthetic, public safety, and right-
of-way flexibility concerns.
Public rights-of-way are appropriate locations for wireless telecommunication
facilities that present minimal impacts (i.e. small pole attachments that do not
require new poles, do not require pole extensions, and do not have associated
ground mounted equipment). Wireless telecommunication facilities that require
greater heights than can be afforded by existing poles in the public right-of-way
and that require ground mounted equipment are more appropriately sited
outside the public right-of-way. The City recognizes, however, that as wireless
technology advances, some residential areas of the City may be hard to serve
with wireless technology due to the lack of siting alternatives in the immediate
vicinity. In such areas, where no alternative non-right-of-way locations are
available, wireless telecommunication facilities that require pole extensions and
ground equipment will be allowed in the public right-of-way subject to the
requirements of this Article which are meant to protect the public health, safety,
and welfare.
2. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities as Pole Attachments. Wireless
telecommunication facilities that comply with the following requirements may be
attached to existing public utility structures within the right-of-way after issuance
of a pole attachment permit:
(a) The wireless telecommunication facility shall not extend above the top of
the existing public utility structure and the height of the existing public
utility structure shall not be increased to accommodate the wireless
telecommunication facility.
(b) If the public utility structure must be replaced to structurally
accommodate the wireless telecommunication facility, the replacement
public utility structure height shall not exceed the existing public utility
structure height and the replacement public utility structure diameter
shall not exceed the existing public utility structure diameter by more
than 50 percent.
(c) The wireless telecommunication facility shall not be larger than three (3)
cubic feet and shall have no individual surface larger than four (4) square
feet.
(d) The wireless telecommunication facility shall not extend outward from
the existing pole or tower or arm thereof by more than two and one half
(2 1/2) feet, except that an antenna one half inch in diameter or less may
extend an additional six inches.
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 6
186712v1
(e) The wireless telecommunication facility shall include no ground mounted
equipment within the rights-of-way.
(f) The wireless telecommunication facility shall not interfere with public
safety communications.
(g) Wireless telecommunication facilities in the right-of-way shall be
removed and relocated at City request subject to the provisions of this
Article.
(h) The wireless telecommunication facility shall not block light emanating
from the public utility structure and shall not otherwise interfere with the
original use of the public utility structure.
3. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities as Pole Extensions or with
Ground Mounted Equipment. Wireless telecommunication facilities that
require increased public utility structure height or that have ground mounted
equipment may be erected in the public right-of-way only when in compliance
with the following provisions and after issuance of a pole attachment permit or
excavation permit:
(a) The applicant shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Public
Works Directorthat the wireless telecommunication facility cannot be
placed in a Code complying location outside the right-of-way within one
quarter (1/4) mile of the proposed location.
(b) The replacement public utility structure, including lightning rods and all
other attachments, shall not exceed the height of the existing public
utility structure by more than fifteen (15) feet. Once the height of a
public utility structure has been increased under the provisions of this
Article, the height shall not be further increased.
(c) The replacement public utility structure diameter shall not exceed the
existing public utility structure diameter by more than fifty (50) percent.
(d) The wireless telecommunication facility shall not extend outward from
the public utility structure by more than two (2) feet.
(e) If feasible and desirable, as determined by the City Public Works
Director, the replacement public utility structure shall match the original
and surrounding public utility structures in materials and color.
(f) The wireless telecommunication facility shall not interfere with public
safety communications.
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 7
186712v1
(g) A pole attachment or excavation permit for a wireless
telecommunication facility that has ground mounted equipment will be
issued only if:
(1) the ground mounted equipment will not disrupt traffic or
pedestrian circulation;
(2) the ground mounted equipment will not create a safety hazard;
(3) the location of the ground mounted equipment minimizes impacts
on adjacent property; and,
(4) the ground mounted equipment will not adversely impact the
health, safety, or welfare of the community.
(h) Ground mounted equipment associated with the wireless
telecommunication facility shall meet the following performance
standards:
(1) be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from the rights-of-way;
(2) be separated from a sidewalk by a minimum of three (3) feet;
(3) be set back a minimum of fifty (50) feet from the nearest
intersecting right-of-way line;
(4) be separated from the nearest ground mounted wireless
telecommunication equipment installation on the same block face
by a minimum of 330 feet unless the equipment is placed
underground;
(5) if located adjacent to residential uses, ground mounted equipment
shall be limited to three (3) feet in height above grade and twenty
seven (27) cubic feet in cumulative size;
(6) if located adjacent to non-residential uses, ground mounted
equipment shall be limited to five (5) feet in height above grade
and eighty-one (81) cubic feet in cumulative size;
(7) ground mounted equipment located outside the public right-of-
way; and
(8) vegetative or other screening compatible with the surrounding
area shall be provided around the ground mounted equipment if
deemed necessary by the City Public Works Director or
designee.
(i) Wireless telecommunication facilities in the right-of-way shall be
removed and relocated at City request subject to the provisions of this
Article.
4. New Poles.
(a) The erection in the right-of-way of a new pole or a replacement pole to
support wireless telecommunication facilities is not allowed, except:
Ordinance No. 2016-10
Page 8
186712v1
(1) when attachment to existing utility poles is not feasible, and
(2) the new pole or replacement pole is owned by the City.
(b) New poles when allowed shall not exceed 35 feet in height and 4 feet in
circumference
5. Charges. In addition to the permit fees outlined in this Chapter, the City
reserves the right to charge telecommunication providers for their use of the
public right-of-way to the extent that such charges are allowed under law.
Telecommunication providers shall be responsible for payment of property taxes
attributable to their equipment in the public right-of-way.
Section 3. This ordinance is effective upon adoption.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
Attest
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on:
Send two affidavits of publication
Bill to Edina City Clerk
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.O.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Request For Purchase
From:Tim Barnes
Item Activity:
Subject:Request For Purchase: City Hall Cleaning Service Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion approving Coverall as the Cleaning Service for City Hall.
INTRODUCTION:
The City Hall is our premier facility in the City Building fleet. We decided to have a cleaning service perform the
work on the City Hall Side. The service that is there has been there for a number of years and we felt the timing
was right to go out for pricing.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Staff report
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
06/21/2016
Mayor and City Council
☒
☐
Tim Barnes, Facility Manager
Request For Purchase – Janitorial Service for City Hall
05/26/2016
Coverall of the Twin Cities
Cady Building Maintenance
ABM
$2,450 monthly
$2,695 monthly
$2,950 monthly
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Coverall of the Twin Cities
Information/Background:
City Hall is our premier facility in the City’s facility inventory. For more than a decade, a cleaning
service performs the work on the City Hall side of the building. The company that has been providing
the cleaning service for the past 7 years has undergone some managerial changes and Staff felt that
it was prudent to solicit quotes for this work.
City Staff recommends that we award the contract to Coverall of the Twin Cities.
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Accept Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
(CAFR) For Year Ended December 31, 2015
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt a motion accepting the 2015 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). James Eichten, CPA, from
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co., P.A., (MMKR) the Principal in charge of the audit, will be
present at the meeting to do a presentation on the audit results.
INTRODUCTION:
MMKR audited the financial statements of the City and issued an unqualified opinion, meaning in their judgment
the City's financial records and statements are fairly presented, and in accordance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP). There are also no findings or recommendations made by MMKR for the 2015
CAFR.
There are three reports attached. The 2015 CAFR is the City's financial report compiled in a format prescribed
by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, the State of
Minnesota, and the Federal Government. The Management Report is a report by the auditors to communicate
information relevant to city finances and to provide comments resulting from their audit process. The Special
Purpose Audit Reports are the result of the extensive audit performed to assess the City's internal controls and
to assure compliance with all of the State's and Federal Government's statutes, laws and regulations.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
2015 CAFR
Management Report
Special Purpose Audit Reports
CAFR Presentation 2016-06-21
Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report for the Fiscal
Year Ended Dec. 31, 2015
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015
Prepared by:
Department of Finance
Eric Roggeman – Treasurer and Finance Director
Kyle Sawyer – Assistant Finance Director
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Letter of Transmittal 1
GFOA Certificate of Achievement 4
Organization 5
Organization Chart 6
II. FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditors' Report 7
Management's Discussion and Analysis 11
Basic Financial Statements:
Government-wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position 23
Statement of Activities 24
Fund Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 26
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement
of Net Position 27
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Governmental Funds 28
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 29
Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds 30
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position -
Proprietary Funds 31
Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 32
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Agency Funds 34
Notes to Financial Statements 35
Required Supplementary Information:
Budgetary Comparison Information:
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund 73
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) 76
Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan Schedule of Funding Progress 77
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans GERF/PEPFF Retirement Funds
GERF Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
& Schedule of City Contributions 78
PEPFF Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
& Schedule of City Contributions 79
Notes to Required Supplementary Information 80
Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules:
Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds 84
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds 85
Special Revenue Fund - Community Development Block Grant
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 86
Special Revenue Fund - Police Special Revenue
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 87
Special Revenue Fund - Braemar Memorial
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 88
Special Revenue Fund - Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 89
Special Revenue Fund - Arts and Culture
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 90
Capital Projects Fund - Environmental Efficiency
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 91
Governmental Fund - Debt Service
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 94
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Governmental Fund - Construction
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 95
Combining Statement of Net Position - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 98
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in
Fund Net Position - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 99
Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 100
Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Funds 103
Supplementary Financial Information:
Tax Capacity, Tax Levies and Tax Capacity Rates 105
Combined Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness 106
Schedule of Balance Sheet Accounts - Tax Increment Financing Districts 108
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance -
Tax Increment Financing Districts 109
III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED)
Financial Trends:
Net Position by Component 112
Changes in Net Position 114
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 116
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 118
Revenue Capacity:
Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property 120
Direct and Overlapping Tax Capacity Rates 121
Principal Property Tax Payers 122
Property Tax Levies and Collections 123
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Debt Capacity:
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 124
Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 125
Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 126
Legal Debt Margin Information 127
Pledged Revenue Coverage 128
Demographic and Economic Information:
Demographic and Economic Statistics 129
Principal Employers 130
Operating Information:
Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 131
Operating Indicators by Function 132
Capital Asset Statistics by Function 133
www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390
June 6, 2016
To the Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Citizens of the City of Edina (City):
Minnesota statutes require that every city publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a
complete set of audited financial statements. This report is published to fulfill that requirement for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.
Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of the information
presented in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated
benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co. P.A., a firm of licensed certified public accountants,
has issued an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the City’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The independent auditor’s report is located at the front of the financial section of
this report.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor’s report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. The
MD&A complements this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it.
Profile of the City
The City, incorporated in 1888, is a fully developed first-ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City currently occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of 50,261. Currently, 98% of the
City is developed with 55.5% of the land attributed to residential uses, 13.1% to roadways and 11.8% supporting the park and open spaces. The remainder of the land is used for commercial, industrial
and public/semi-public uses. The City is empowered to levy a property tax on both real and personal property located within its boundaries.
The City has operated under the Council-Manager form of government since 1955. Policy-making
and legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor and four other members, all elected on a non-partisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for
passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees, and hiring the City Manager. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Council, for overseeing
the day-to-day operations of the city government, and for appointing the heads of the various departments. Council members serve four-year terms, with two Council members elected every two
years. The Mayor also serves a four-year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large.
The City provides a full range of services, including police and fire protection; the construction and maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure; water and sewer services and
recreational and cultural activities and events.
The Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the fiscal year. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the City’s financial planning and control. The budget is
prepared by fund, function (e.g. public safety), and department (e.g. police). Department heads may use resources within a department as they see fit. The City Manager may authorize transfers of
budgeted amounts between departments.
1
2
Local economy
The City currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and local indicators point to continued stability. The region, while noted for a strong retail sector, enjoyed considerable re-development in
recent years. The re-development consisted of varied manufacturing, medical and high-tech base that adds to the relative stability of the unemployment rate. Major industries with headquarters or divisions
within the government’s boundaries or in close proximity include medical services, retail operations and banking services. Edina is home to over 50,000 jobs that are expected to remain stable over the
coming years.
The City has become known for its quality residential housing stock and attractive neighborhoods. To date, approximately 98% of the available housing stock is in place. Although the emphasis has
changed over the years from exclusively single family housing to a more balanced mix of housing types, the City’s concern for overall quality in residential development remains a top priority.
The City enjoys a AAA bond rating and a Aaa bond rating from Standard and Poors and Moody’s,
respectively.
Long-term financial planning
The Metropolitan Council requires all cities in the seven-county metropolitan area to have a Comprehensive Plan and State law requires cities to update their plans every 10 years. The
Comprehensive Plan guides development and redevelopment and addresses changes likely to occur due to various social and market forces. The City updated our Comprehensive Plan and submitted it
to the Metropolitan Council for review in 2008. A final version was adopted by the City Council in 2009.
The City continues to focus on quality of life improvements throughout Edina. These efforts cover a
broad array of areas including protecting and improving the environment, revitalization of parks and public areas, expanding recreational opportunities, expanding City services, and increasing
communication between City representatives and the public.
The City is working closely with state government, federal government and neighboring communities to improve the area’s state and county transportation network, which includes upgraded highways
and well-placed pathways. Funding for most of the transportation improvements will need to come from state, county and federal sources, with some minor portion supported by the local taxpayers.
Relevant financial policies
The City has adopted a set of financial management policies that focus on long-term financial
planning. Policies cover areas such as cash and investments, the operating budget, revenue, fund balance, capital outlay, and debt management.
Assignments for investments and compensated absences are all calculated as specified in the
policies. In addition, the City has $11,825,799 unassigned fund balance in the general fund. This amount is $64,542 above the goal range identified in the policy.
Major initiatives
The City is continually working to update our aging infrastructure. Our annually adopted five-year
Capital Improvement Plan includes spending and financing projections for these projects.
3
Awards and Acknowledgements
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Edina for its
comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. This was the seventh consecutive year that the government has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be
awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted
accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s
requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the Finance Department staff. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the
department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor and the City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of
professionalism in the management of the City’s finances.
Respectfully submitted,
Eric Roggeman Finance Director
Kyle Sawyer
Assistant Finance Director
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Edina
Minnesota
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2014
Executive Director/CEO
4
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
ORGANIZATION
December 31, 2015
Term Expires
Mayor:
James Hovland December 31, 2016
Council Members:
Mary Brindle December 31, 2016
Ann Swenson December 31, 2016
Kevin Staunton December 31, 2018
Bob Stewart December 31, 2018
City Manager:
Scott Neal Appointed
Finance Director/Treasurer:
Eric Roggeman Appointed
City Clerk:
Debra Mangen Appointed
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
Ci
t
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
As
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
Cit
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Ci
t
y
Cle
r
k
Liq
u
o
r
St
o
r
e
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
/
H
R
A
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
& Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
In
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
Hu
m
a
n
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
Po
l
i
c
e
Pa
t
r
o
l
In
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
He
a
l
t
h
Fir
e
Fi
r
e
& Re
s
c
u
e
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
St
r
e
e
t
s
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Pa
r
k
s
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
De
s
i
g
n
&
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Sy
s
t
e
m
s
Pa
r
k
s
&
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
& Recreation Enterprise FacilitiesCommunity Development Planning Assessing
6
7
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes
the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITY
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted
our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s
internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our audit opinions.
(continued)
8
OPINIONS
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to on the previous page present fairly, in all material
respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2015, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof, for the year then
ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
EMPHASIS OF MATTER
As described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements, the City has implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for
Pensions—an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27, and GASB Statement No. 71, Pension Transition
for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date—an amendment of GASB Statement No. 68, during the year ended December 31, 2015. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
OTHER MATTERS
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management’s
Discussion and Analysis and the required supplementary information (RSI), as listed in the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part
of the basic financial statements, is required by the GASB, who considers it to be an essential part of
financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the RSI in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of
management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other
knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion
or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual fund
financial statements and schedules, supplementary financial information, and statistical section, as listed
in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the basic financial statements.
The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records
used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other
records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and
other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
(continued)
9
The introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section have not been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them.
OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 6, 2016 on
our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose
of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and
compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial reporting and
compliance.
Minneapolis, Minnesota June 6, 2016
10
This page left blank intentionally.
11
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
As management of the City of Edina (the City), we offer readers of the City’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2015. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which precedes this
report.
Financial Highlights
The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $225,316,482 (net position). Of this amount, $38,363,235 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the City’s ongoing
obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the City's fund designations and fiscal policies.
The City’s total net position decreased by $7,575,954; a $21,451,167 decrease from a change in
accounting principle related to pensions and an increase of $13,875,213 from current year operations. $4,132,128 of the operations increase is due to special assessment revenues, which
help support our road reconstruction program. Also, $4,661,858 of the increase is due to Utility revenues over expenses, which are being reinvested in new or rebuilt infrastructure according to
the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Utility Rate Study.
As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending
fund balances of $44,539,728, a decrease of $5,497,051 in comparison with the prior year. The decrease can be attributed to the general obligation refunding bond, series 2014B that was
issued in 2014 in the amount of $12,720,000 and refunded $6,700,000 of governmental fund bonds in early 2015.
At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the general fund was $11,825,799 or 34% of total general fund expenditures.
The City’s total bonded debt decreased by $6,021,375 during the current fiscal year, from
$117,110,970 to $111,089,595. The City and HRA issued new debt during the year consisting of $14,275,000 general obligation bonds to finance various street and utility infrastructure
improvement projects, $3,490,000 HRA public project revenue bonds to refund old HRA debt, and $2,140,000 revenue bonds to finance improvements at the golf course. A total of
$20,585,000 in bonds were redeemed in 2015 related to refunding debt issued in 2014 and 2015.
Overview of the Financial Statements
This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial statements. The City’s basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-wide
financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements
themselves. Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector
business.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
12
The statement of net position presents information on all of the City’s assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between them reported as
net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating.
The statement of activities presents information showing how the City’s net position changed during
the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and
expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave).
Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally
supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges
(business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public safety, public works and parks. The business-type activities of the City include utilities, liquor, aquatic
center, golf course, arena, and community activity centers.
Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other
state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories:
governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds.
Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on
balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financial requirements.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide
financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide
financial statement. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City's near term financial decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and
governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and change in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and
governmental activities.
The City maintains four individual major governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement
of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund, Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund, debt service fund and the construction fund.
Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
Individual fund data for each of these non-major governmental funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report.
The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for its general fund, debt service fund,
construction fund, all of its special revenue funds, the environmental efficiency capital projects fund, and proprietary funds. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided
for the general fund, debt service fund, construction fund, all the special revenue funds, and the environmental efficiency capital projects fund to demonstrate compliance with these
budgets.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
13
Proprietary funds. The City maintains five major enterprise funds and one internal service fund. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type
activities in the governmental-wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its utility, liquor, aquatic center, golf course and arena operations.
Data from the other proprietary funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
Individual fund data for each of these non-major proprietary funds are provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report.
Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial
statements, only in more detail.
Internal service funds. Internal service funds are used as an accounting device to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the City’s various functions. The City uses its
internal service fund to account for risk management activities, including worker’s compensation, volunteer accident, and property/casualty insurance. Because the internal
service activities predominantly benefit government rather than business-type functions, these services have been included within governmental activities in the government-wide
financial statements.
Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide
financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City’s own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for
proprietary funds.
Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government–wide and fund financial statements.
Other information. The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non-major
governmental and enterprise funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information on budgetary comparisons.
Government-wide Financial Analysis
As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial
position. In the case of the City, assets exceeded liabilities by $225,316,482 at the close of the most recent fiscal year.
The largest portion of the City's net position ($169,234,412 or 75%) reflects its investment in capital
assets (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens;
consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay
this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
14
City of Edina’s Net Position
2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
Assets:
Current and
other assets 68,610,375$ 74,584,744$ 25,007,055$ 34,082,921$ 93,617,430$ 108,667,665$
Capital assets 158,595,429 148,079,729 123,960,540 114,997,600 282,555,969 263,077,329
Total assets 227,205,804$ 222,664,473$ 148,967,595$ 149,080,521$ 376,173,399$ 371,744,994$
Deferred outflows of resources:
Pension plan deferments 3,643,551$ -$ 571,368$ -$ 4,214,919$ -$
Liabilities:
Long-term liabilities
outstanding 91,065,988$ 67,962,254$ 40,070,384$ 33,901,645$ 131,136,372$ 101,863,899$
Other liabilities 12,337,783 19,408,776 8,376,163 17,579,883 20,713,946 36,988,659
Total liabilities 103,403,771$ 87,371,030$ 48,446,547$ 51,481,528$ 151,850,318$ 138,852,558$
Deferred inflows of resources:
Pension plan deferments 2,723,965$ -$ 497,553$ -$ 3,221,518$ -$
Net position:
Net investment in
capital assets 85,838,618$ 85,708,114$ 83,395,794$ 75,803,672$ 169,234,412$ 161,511,786$
Restricted 16,925,171 18,268,724 793,664 619,295 17,718,835 18,888,019
Unrestricted 21,957,830 31,316,605 16,405,405 21,176,026 38,363,235 52,492,631
Total net position 124,721,619$ 135,293,443$ 100,594,863$ 97,598,993$ 225,316,482$ 232,892,436$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
An additional portion of the City’s net position ($17,718,835) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position ($38,363,235) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories of net position reported, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business-type activities. The same situation held true for the prior fiscal year. There was a decrease of $14,129,396 in unrestricted net position due to the implementation of a new accounting standard related to pension obligations. Further information regarding this accounting standard can be found in the notes to the financial statements. This change also impacted the change in long-term liabilities, deferred outflows of resources, and deferred inflows of resources. The decline in current and other assets, and other liabilities relates to the use of refunding bonds cash held in
escrow to pay refunded debt.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
15
As shown below, the City’s net position increased by $13,875,213 during the current fiscal year, prior to the change in accounting principle related to the aforementioned accounting standard. Factors
contributing to this change are discussed in the next two sections.
City of Edina's Changes in Net Position
2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
Revenues:
Program revenues:
Charges for services 11,164,102$ 10,592,168$ 41,063,598$ 39,889,554$ 52,227,700$ 50,481,722$
Operating grants and
contributions 3,122,178 1,578,538 595,141 428,416 3,717,319 2,006,954
Capital grants and
contributions 10,044,077 8,244,695 - - 10,044,077 8,244,695
General revenues:
Property taxes 29,632,072 27,062,224 - - 29,632,072 27,062,224
Other taxes 3,904,650 7,119,402 - - 3,904,650 7,119,402
Gain on disposal
of assets 41,900 29,037 39,427 - 81,327 29,037
Unrestricted investment
earnings 195,620 440,051 91,907 191,974 287,527 632,025
Total revenues 58,104,599 55,066,115 41,790,073 40,509,944 99,894,672 95,576,059
Expenses:
General government 8,518,236 8,522,319 - - 8,518,236 8,522,319
Public safety 19,507,770 18,145,498 - - 19,507,770 18,145,498
Public works 15,284,777 15,553,852 - - 15,284,777 15,553,852
Parks 3,385,367 3,330,781 - - 3,385,367 3,330,781
Interest on long-term debt 2,180,678 1,989,863 - - 2,180,678 1,989,863
Utilities - - 14,963,304 14,207,197 14,963,304 14,207,197
Liquor - - 11,818,602 12,393,218 11,818,602 12,393,218
Aquatic center - - 872,960 827,485 872,960 827,485
Golf course - - 3,409,343 3,342,544 3,409,343 3,342,544
Arena - - 2,642,097 2,375,173 2,642,097 2,375,173
Community activity
centers - - 3,436,325 2,975,782 3,436,325 2,975,782
Total expenses 48,876,828 47,542,313 37,142,631 36,121,399 86,019,459 83,663,712
Increase in net position
before transfers 9,227,771 7,523,802 4,647,442 4,388,545 13,875,213 11,912,347
Transfers (2,230,966) (9,605,225) 2,230,966 9,605,225 - -
Change in net position 6,996,805 (2,081,423) 6,878,408 13,993,770 13,875,213 11,912,347
Net position - January 1
as previously reported 135,293,443 137,374,866 97,598,993 83,605,223 232,892,436 220,980,089
Change in accounting principle (17,568,629) - (3,882,538) - (21,451,167) -
Net position - January 1
as restated 117,724,814 137,374,866 93,716,455 83,605,223 211,441,269 220,980,089
Net position - December 31 124,721,619$ 135,293,443$ 100,594,863$ 97,598,993$ 225,316,482$ 232,892,436$
Governmental Activities Business-type Activities Totals
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
16
Governmental Activities
Governmental activities increased the City's net position by $6,996,805, accounting for 50% of the total growth in net position. Key elements of this increase before the change in accounting principle
are as follows.
Operating grants and contributions increased by $1,543,640, or 98% in 2015. This is primarily the result of livable communities grants received, that were passed through to developers for
expenses incurred related to economic development of the Pentagon Park area. Indicative of their name, pass through grants have no net impact on the City’s net position.
Capital grants and contributions increased by $1,799,382, or 22% in 2015. This is a result of increased state maintenance aid received for various infrastructure projects, most notably the
54th street bridge and street repair.
Property taxes increased by $2,569,848, as the result of a new levy to fund the sports dome construction and an increased levy for the City’s equipment replacement program.
Net transfers decreased by $7,374,259. In 2014, large transfers were made from the
construction fund to the arena and sports dome funds to reimburse for proceeds initially received in the construction fund for capital projects at those facilities.
Other taxes decreased by $3,214,752 due to a decline in tax increment collections.
Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues and expenses:
Charges for services19%
Operating grants and contributions5%
Capital grants and contributions17%
Property taxes51%
Other taxes7%
Other1%
Revenues by Source - Governmental Activities
-
5
10
15
20
Generalgovernment Public safety Public works Parks Interest onlong-termdebt
Millions
Expenses and Program Revenues - Governmental
Activities
expenses
program revenue
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
17
Business-type Activities
Business-type activities increased net position by $6,878,408, accounting for 50% of the City's growth in net position. Key elements of the current year increase before the change in accounting principle
are as follows:
The utility fund had income before transfers of $4,661,858 for 2015. This additional equity is
used to invest in new and rebuilt utility infrastructure according to the City’s CIP and utility rate study.
The liquor fund had income before transfer of $653,384 for 2015. This additional equity is used to subsidize operations at other enterprise facilities.
Charges for services99%
Operating grants and
contributions
1%
Revenues by Source - Business-type Activities
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Utilities Liquor Aquaticcenter Golf course Arena Communityactivitycenters
Millions
Expenses and Program Revenues - Business-type
Activities
expenses
program revenue
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
18
Financial Analysis of the City's Funds
As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements.
Governmental Funds. The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-
term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City’s financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful
measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $44,539,728, a decrease of $5,497,051 in comparison with the prior year. Approximately
27% of this total amount ($11,825,799) constitutes unassigned fund balance. The remainder of the fund balance is 1) nonspendable due to prepaid items ($529,513), 2) restricted by external creditors,
grantors, laws or regulations ($17,509,137), or 3) assigned by internal constraints ($14,675,279).
The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance of the general fund was $11,825,799. As a measure of the general fund’s
liquidity, unassigned fund balance represents 34% of total general fund expenditures.
The fund balance of the City’s general fund increased by $326,646 during the current fiscal year. Key factors in this increase are as follows:
Total general fund revenues were $2,552,762 over budget, including higher than expected building permit activity. General fund license and permit revenues increased by 7.5% in the
current fiscal year after an 8.9% and 31.8% increase in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Total general fund expenditures were $387,278 under budget. The majority of this occurred in the police and engineering departments as a result of turnover and various positions being vacant throughout the year.
The liquor fund did not transfer $765,100 of profits to the general fund as planned in the initial
2015 budget, due to increased competition in the market resulting in decreased profits.
Transfers out of the general fund totaled $1,848,294 with the majority related to the 2014 unassigned fund balance and parkland dedication fees transferred to fund various
construction projects.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund balance increased by $91,962 in the current fiscal year due to less capital outlay spending than anticipated. Discussions were held regarding various
redevelopment projects, and increased capital outlay spending anticipated for future years.
The debt service fund has a total fund balance of $7,134,575, all of which is restricted for the payment of debt service. The net decrease in fund balance during the current year in the debt service
fund was $5,543,716. Fund balance decreased as the result of the general obligation refunding bond, series 2014B that was issued in 2014 in the amount of $12,720,000 and refunded $6,700,000 of debt
service fund bonds in February 2015.
The construction fund balance increased by $523,826 in 2015 due to increased state maintenance aid received for various projects, an increased tax levy for the City’s equipment replacement program,
and debt issued in 2015 for the 50th and France parking project, with the majority of the expenditures incurred in 2014.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
19
Proprietary funds. The City’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements, but in more detail.
Unrestricted net position of the utility fund at the end of the year amounted to $13,833,202. The total
growth in net position from current year operations was $4,477,382. Operating revenues in the utilities fund increased by 10.2% while expenses increased by 7.0% in 2015. Revenues increased
due to an increase in the water and sewer connection fees. Expenses increased as a result of higher depreciation expenses related to infrastructure projects completed in recent years, along with
increased fees set by the Metropolitan Council for sewer service. The City invested $11,977,234 in utility fund capital assets during 2015.
Unrestricted net position of the liquor fund at the end of the year amounted to $501,987. Total net
position decreased by $131,616 from current year operations. The liquor fund continues to transfer profits back into other City funds, including the construction, golf course, arena and art center funds.
The liquor fund made transfers totaling $785,000 to other funds during 2015.
Unrestricted net position of the aquatic center fund at the end of the year amounted to $541,416. Aquatic center revenues increased by 5.8% from 2014 due to more favorable weather in 2015. The
aquatic center remains profitable.
Unrestricted net position of the golf course fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($173,427) a decrease of $780,838 from the prior year. $535,523 of the decrease is a direct result of
the new pension accounting standard implemented in 2015. The standard requires enterprise funds to recognize a net pension liability equal to their share of the unfunded liability of the plan as
determined by the Public Employee Retirement Association (PERA). In addition, the golf course fund contributed land and buildings totaling $1,008,330 from the now closed Fred Richards golf course to
the general fund, and the golf course fund recorded an accounting charge of $480,683.
Unrestricted net position of the arena fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($353,007), a decrease of $311,595 from the prior year. The decrease in 2015 is in large part the result of
recognizing a new net pension liability of $417,141 related to the aforementioned accounting standard. Overall, arena revenues increased by $216,300 or 10.3% due to increased building rental
revenue, and expenses increased by $270,325 or 12.1% due mostly to increased personal service expenses.
General Fund Budgetary Highlights
During the year there was a $2,613,394 increase in appropriations between the original and final
amended budget. The majority of the increase was transfers to the construction fund of unassigned general fund balance according to the City’s fund balance policy along with parkland dedication fees
transferred for new park signage and the completion of the promenade project.
During the year, revenues were $2,552,762 more than budget, as the continued commercial and residential redevelopment of the City increased our licenses and permits and parkland dedication
revenues, which exceeded budget by $1,797,554.
During the year, expenditures were $387,278 under budget due to turnover of employees in various departments, resulting in numerous positions being vacant throughout the year.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
20
Capital Asset and Debt Administration
Capital assets. The City’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business type activities as of December 31, 2015, amounted to $282,555,969 (net of accumulated depreciation).
This investment in capital assets included land, land improvements, intangible assets such as easements, infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), buildings, vehicles,
equipment, parks, and construction in progress. The total increase in the City’s investment in capital assets for the current fiscal year was 7.4% (a 7.1% increase for governmental activities and a 7.8%
increase for business-type activities).
Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following:
The City continued construction on the sports dome; $5,674,952 of the project was
capitalized and construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year is $3,347,572.
The City continued construction on the outdoor rink at the arena; $2,089,228 of the project was capitalized and construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year is $1,084,226.
A variety of street construction, sidewalk and park projects; construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $21,353,521.
A variety of utility infrastructure improvements, including watermain, sanitary and storm
sewer, construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $12,105,636.
The City completed the Hawkes and Morningside neighborhoods utility and street
reconstruction projects; total construction cost was $3,575,393. City of Edina’s Capital Assets (Net of Depreciation)
2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
Land and land
improvements 27,379,588$ 27,104,500$ 3,230,890$ 4,645,595$ 30,610,478$ 31,750,095$
Easements 253,000 111,000 - - 253,000 111,000
Buildings and structures 43,816,890 45,431,238 20,150,029 14,234,412 63,966,919 59,665,650
Machinery and equipment 5,906,091 6,256,555 6,578,366 5,906,900 12,484,457 12,163,455
Infrastructure 51,625,947 45,685,016 74,783,668 73,845,503 126,409,615 119,530,519
Parks 8,260,392 6,868,402 - - 8,260,392 6,868,402
Construction in progress 21,353,521 16,623,018 19,217,587 16,365,190 40,571,108 32,988,208
Total 158,595,429$ 148,079,729$ 123,960,540$ 114,997,600$ 282,555,969$ 263,077,329$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in Note 3.
Long-term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long-term debt outstanding of $111,089,595, a decrease of $6,021,375 from 2014. This decrease resulted from
$19,905,000 in new debt, offset by payment of previously scheduled principal payments and $20,585,000 in debt refunded.
$26,710,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and
special assessments. This amount decreased from 2014 due to previously scheduled principal payments and a refunding, along with no debt issuances in 2015.
$23,905,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City’s special
assessment program. This amount increased from 2014 due to regularly scheduled principal payments and a refunding on outstanding issues offset by newly issued debt of $9,040,000.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
21
Also outstanding is $21,290,000 HRA public project revenue bonds which financed two gymnasiums, the new public works facility, sports dome, outdoor rink at the arena, and improvements to Pamela
Park. This amount decreased in 2015 due to an issuance of new refunding debt that refunded the debt related to the two gymnasiums.
There is a total of $39,145,000 in revenue bonds for improvements to the enterprise funds. This
amount decreased $5,275,000 during the year due to $7,375,000 in issued debt offset by $2,525,000 in regularly scheduled principal payments and $10,125,000 in refunding on outstanding issues. The
debt was refunded with proceeds from the General Obligation refunding bond, series 2014B. $5,235,000 of the issued debt is to finance various utility infrastructure improvement projects with the
remaining issuance funding renovations at the golf course.
City of Edina’s Outstanding Debt
2015 2014 2015 2014 2015 2014
General obligation bonds 26,710,000$ 30,200,000$ -$ -$ 26,710,000$ 30,200,000$
Public improvement bonds 23,905,000 20,880,000 - - 23,905,000 20,880,000
Public project revenue bonds 21,290,000 21,560,000 - - 21,290,000 21,560,000
Edina emerald energy program bonds 39,595 50,970 - - 39,595 50,970
Revenue bonds - - 39,145,000 44,420,000 39,145,000 44,420,000
Total 71,944,595$ 72,690,970$ 39,145,000$ 44,420,000$ 111,089,595$ 117,110,970$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
The City maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AAA rating from Standard & Poor’s.
State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue up to 3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City is $291,050,307. Only $48,000,000 of
the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory limitation.
Additional information on the City’s long-term debt can be found in Note 4.
Economic Factors and Next Year’s Budget
The City strives to provide an uncommonly high quality of life for our residents and businesses and the relatively healthy local economy helps to make this goal a reality. The unemployment rate in
Edina for December 2015 was 2.82%, well below the state and national levels. The City is home to Southdale Center, the nation’s first fully enclosed climate-controlled regional shopping mall, Fairview
Southdale hospital, as well as several corporate headquarters. In addition to its healthy economy, Edina is known for excellent public schools, as the Edina school system has been consistently
selected as one of the best in the country. Ninety-eight percent of students graduate, with ninety-four percent pursuing some sort of post-secondary education.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
22
Property values in Edina increased for several years through 2008, but values declined from 2009-2012 and are back on the rise in 2013-2015. Estimated market value of real estate increased 5.9%
for taxes payable in 2016.
-8.0%-6.0%-4.0%-2.0%0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%10.0%12.0%14.0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Market Value and Tax CapacityAnnual Changes Tax Capacity
Market Value
The City collects property taxes based on tax capacity, which roughly equals estimated market value multiplied by class rates for different types of parcels (commercial, residential, etc.). Class rates are
set by state statute. Tax capacity for real estate increased 6.6% for taxes payable in 2016, and remained positive for the third consecutive year.
All of these factors above were considered in preparing the City’s budget for the 2016 fiscal year. The
City’s adopted 2016 budget includes a property tax levy of $31,799,123 for all funds, an increase of 7.1% from the 2015 levy, with the increase being attributed to the general operating levy to cover
increased market costs, and reducing the City’s reliance on a liquor transfer into the general fund.
Requests for Information
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City’s finances for all those with an interest in the government’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this
report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Office of the Finance Director, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. The City’s Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report can also be found on the internet at www.cityofedina.com.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
December 31, 2015
Governmental Business-type
Activities Activities Total
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and investments 46,109,056$ 17,275,250$ 63,384,306$
Restricted cash and investments 583,966 1,224,114 1,808,080
Accrued interest 83,728 39,136 122,864
Accounts receivable, net 1,115,202 4,112,196 5,227,398
Special assessments receivable 17,679,866 549,253 18,229,119
Due from other governments 924,579 43,223 967,802
Prepaid items 529,513 495,341 1,024,854 Inventory - 1,268,542 1,268,542
Total current assets 67,025,910 25,007,055 92,032,965
Noncurrent assets:
Investment in joint powers agreement 1,584,465 - 1,584,465
Nondepreciable capital assets 42,600,554 19,502,928 62,103,482
Depreciable capital assets (net) 115,994,875 104,457,612 220,452,487
Total noncurrent assets 160,179,894 123,960,540 284,140,434
Deferred outflows of resources:Defined benefit pension plans 3,643,551 571,368 4,214,919
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 230,849,355 149,538,963 380,388,318
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 2,022,617 706,863 2,729,480
Salaries payable 514,659 120,987 635,646
Accrued interest payable 976,643 470,378 1,447,021
Contracts payable 910,454 1,158,645 2,069,099
Due to other governments 21,804 170,969 192,773
Deposits payable 1,107,203 5,000 1,112,203
Unearned revenue 2,005 99,957 101,962
Compensated absences payable 1,547,398 343,364 1,890,762
Bonds payable 5,235,000 5,300,000 10,535,000
Total current liabilities 12,337,783 8,376,163 20,713,946
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 1,736,418 192,756 1,929,174
Net pension liability 18,902,697 4,032,363 22,935,060
Compensated absences payable 2,321,096 515,050 2,836,146
Bonds payable, net 68,105,777 35,330,215 103,435,992
Total noncurrent liabilities 91,065,988 40,070,384 131,136,372
Deferred inflows of resources:Defined benefit pension plans 2,723,965 497,553 3,221,518
Total liabilities and deferred inflows of resources 106,127,736 48,944,100 155,071,836
Net position:Net investment in capital assets 85,838,618 83,395,794 169,234,412
Restricted for tax increments 8,021,960 - 8,021,960
Restricted for debt service 6,773,070 793,664 7,566,734
Restricted for pedestrian and cyclist improvements 713,168 - 713,168
Restricted for energy efficiency projects 328,671 - 328,671
Restricted for parkland dedication 417,673 - 417,673
Restricted for police special revenue 525,653 - 525,653
Restricted for braemar golf donations 142,228 - 142,228
Restricted for arts and culture donations 2,748 - 2,748
Unrestricted 21,957,830 16,405,405 38,363,235
Total net position 124,721,619$ 100,594,863$ 225,316,482$
Primary Government
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
23
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Operating Capital
Charges for Grants and Grants and
Expenses Services Contributions Contributions
Functions/Programs
Primary government:
Governmental activities:
General government 8,518,236$ 1,322,430$ 1,514,564$ 77,750$
Public safety 19,507,770 8,683,465 1,342,373 42,461
Public works 15,284,777 537,325 261,297 9,061,215
Parks 3,385,367 620,882 3,944 862,651
Interest on long-term debt 2,180,678 - - -
Total government activities 48,876,828 11,164,102 3,122,178 10,044,077
Business-type activities:
Utilities 14,963,304 19,335,443 210,173 -
Liquor 11,818,602 12,462,387 6,321 -
Aquatic center 872,960 971,936 - -
Golf course 3,409,343 2,857,190 48,131 -
Arena 2,642,097 2,316,853 56,170 -
Community activity centers 3,436,325 3,119,789 274,346 -
Total business-type activities 37,142,631 41,063,598 595,141 -
Total primary government 86,019,459$ 52,227,700$ 3,717,319$ 10,044,077$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Program Revenues
24
Governmental Business-type
Activities Activities Total
(5,603,492)$ -$ (5,603,492)$
(9,439,471) - (9,439,471)
(5,424,940) - (5,424,940)
(1,897,890) - (1,897,890)
(2,180,678) - (2,180,678)
(24,546,471) - (24,546,471)
- 4,582,312 4,582,312
- 650,106 650,106
- 98,976 98,976
- (504,022) (504,022)
- (269,074) (269,074)
- (42,190) (42,190)
- 4,516,108 4,516,108
(24,546,471) 4,516,108 (20,030,363)
General revenues:
Property taxes 29,632,072 - 29,632,072
Tax increment collections 1,792,896 - 1,792,896
Franchise taxes 2,089,038 - 2,089,038
Lodging taxes 22,716 - 22,716
Unrestricted investment earnings 195,620 91,907 287,527
Gain on disposal of capital assets 41,900 39,427 81,327
Transfers (2,230,966) 2,230,966 -
Total general revenues and transfers 31,543,276 2,362,300 33,905,576
Change in net position 6,996,805 6,878,408 13,875,213
Net position - beginning as previously reported 135,293,443 97,598,993 232,892,436
Change in accounting principle (17,568,629) (3,882,538) (21,451,167)
Net position - beginning as restated 117,724,814 93,716,455 211,441,269
Net position - ending 124,721,619$ 100,594,863$ 225,316,482$
Net (Expense) Revenue and
Changes in Net Position
25
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
BALANCE SHEET
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2015
Housing & Nonmajor Total
Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental
General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds
Assets
Cash and Investments 15,206,793$ 8,024,689$ 6,752,650$ 14,637,659$ 1,432,704$ 46,054,495$
Restricted cash and
investments - - 361,505 222,461 - 583,966
Accrued interest 31,168 20,443 - 27,455 4,587 83,653
Accounts receivable 505,644 44,308 - 273,133 292,117 1,115,202
Special assessmentsreceivable - - 2,719,711 14,960,155 - 17,679,866
Due from other governments 534,679 3,411 32,619 216,303 137,567 924,579
Prepaid items 529,513 - - - - 529,513 Total assets 16,807,797$ 8,092,851$ 9,866,485$ 30,337,166$ 1,866,975$ 66,971,274$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 693,127$ 69,007$ 5,267$ 1,119,761$ 135,455$ 2,022,617$
Salaries payable 508,279 1,884 - 2,788 1,708 514,659
Contracts payable - - - 893,201 17,253 910,454
Due to other governments 21,738 - - 66 - 21,804
Deposits payable 1,107,203 - - - - 1,107,203
Unearned revenue 2,005 - - - - 2,005
Total liabilities 2,332,352 70,891 5,267 2,015,816 154,416 4,578,742
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue - taxes 155,062 - 6,932 10,853 91 172,938
Unavailable revenue -
special assessments - - 2,719,711 14,960,155 - 17,679,866
Total deferred inflows ofresources 155,062 - 2,726,643 14,971,008 91 17,852,804
Fund balance:
Nonspendable 529,513 - - - - 529,513
Restricted 417,673 8,021,960 7,134,575 222,461 1,712,468 17,509,137
Assigned 1,547,398 - - 13,127,881 - 14,675,279
Unassigned 11,825,799 - - - - 11,825,799
Total fund balance 14,320,383 8,021,960 7,134,575 13,350,342 1,712,468 44,539,728
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources,
and fund balances 16,807,797$ 8,092,851$ 9,866,485$ 30,337,166$ 1,866,975$ 66,971,274$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
26
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
December 31, 2015
Total fund balances - governmental funds 44,539,728$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because:
Cost of capital assets 274,418,431
Accumulated depreciation (115,823,002)
Bonds payable (71,944,595)
Premium on bonds (1,829,890)
Discount on bonds 433,708
Compensated absences payable (3,868,494)
Net OPEB obligation (1,736,418)
Net pension obligation (18,902,697)
(976,643)
1,584,465
Deferred outflows - pension plans 3,643,551
Deferred inflows - pension plans (2,723,965)
Deferred inflows - property taxes 172,938
Deferred inflows - special assessments 17,679,866
54,636
Total net position - governmental activities 124,721,619$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The recognition of certain revenues and expenditures differ between the full accrual governmental
activities financial statements and the modified accrual governmental fund financial statements.
Capital assets are included in net position, but are excluded from fund balances because they do not
represent financial resources.
Long-term liabilities are included in net positon, but are excluded from fund balances until due and
payable. Debt issuance premiums and discounts are excluded from net position until amortized, but are
included in fund balances upon issuance as other financing sources and uses
Accrued interest payable on long-term debt is included in net position, but is excluded from fund
balances until due and payable.
Investment in joint powers agreement are not available to pay for current-period expenditures, and
therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual
funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service fund are included in the governmental activities
in the Statement of Net Position.
27
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Housing & Nonmajor Total
Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental
General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds
Revenues:
General property taxes 22,822,441$ -$ 5,085,348$ 1,607,481$ 20,000$ 29,535,270$
Tax increment collections - 1,792,896 - - - 1,792,896
Franchise taxes 833,229 - - 101,275 1,154,534 2,089,038
Lodging tax 22,716 - - - - 22,716
Special assessments - - 47,491 4,084,637 - 4,132,128
License and permits 4,827,634 - - 79,730 - 4,907,364
Intergovernmental 1,477,694 - - 4,430,191 186,081 6,093,966
Charges for services 4,226,690 44,308 - 143,993 - 4,414,991
Fines and forfeitures 1,033,116 - - - 162,155 1,195,271
Investment income 78,713 27,564 945 81,274 6,818 195,314
Rental of property 416,522 - - - - 416,522
Parkland dedication 800,000 - - - - 800,000
Other revenues 69,139 - - 236,469 55,817 361,425
Total revenues 36,607,894 1,864,768 5,133,784 10,765,050 1,585,405 55,956,901
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 5,771,748 426,716 - 42,090 97,390 6,337,944
Public safety 17,314,312 - - 16,635 206,581 17,537,528
Public works 9,981,474 - - 425,376 171,622 10,578,472
Parks 1,365,420 - - 9,895 41,543 1,416,858
Capital outlay:
General government - 678,039 - 1,791,833 - 2,469,872
Public safety - - - 1,401,325 196,467 1,597,792
Public works - 668,051 - 11,381,431 1,510,402 13,559,884
Parks - - - 2,285,017 - 2,285,017
Debt service:
Bond principal - - 13,276,375 - - 13,276,375
Interest and fiscal charges - - 2,375,613 - - 2,375,613
Total expenditures 34,432,954 1,772,806 15,651,988 17,353,602 2,224,005 71,435,355
Revenues over
(under) expenditures 2,174,940 91,962 (10,518,204) (6,588,552) (638,600) (15,478,454)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in - - 1,000,000 2,232,770 - 3,232,770
Transfers out (1,848,294) - - (4,366,603) (257,169) (6,472,066)
Sale of capital assets - - - 78,509 - 78,509
Insurance recovery - - - 167,167 - 167,167
Bonds issued - - 361,315 8,678,685 - 9,040,000
Refunding bonds issued - - 3,490,000 - - 3,490,000
Premium on bonds issued - - 150,346 342,492 - 492,838
Discount on bonds issued - - (27,173) (20,642) - (47,815)
Total other financing
sources (uses) (1,848,294) - 4,974,488 7,112,378 (257,169) 9,981,403
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance 326,646 91,962 (5,543,716) 523,826 (895,769) (5,497,051)
Fund balance - January 1 13,993,737 7,929,998 12,678,291 12,826,516 2,608,237 50,036,779
Fund balance - December 31 14,320,383$ 8,021,960$ 7,134,575$ 13,350,342$ 1,712,468$ 44,539,728$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
28
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Total net change in fund balances - governmental funds (5,497,051)$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:
Capital outlays 17,246,834
Contributed assets 1,008,330
Depreciation expense (7,535,688)
(203,776)
2,051,162
(12,530,000)
13,276,375
(19,932)
(230,156)
Net pension liability (374,175)
Net OPEB obiligation (191,471)
Compensated absences payable (17,976)
Deferred outflows - pension plans 2,683,658
Deferred inflows - pension plans (2,723,965)
54,636
Change in net position - governmental activities 6,996,805$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Capital assets are recorded in net position and the cost is allocated over their estimated useful lives as
depreciation expense. However, fund balances are reduced for the full cost of capital outlays at the
time of purchase.
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual
funds. The change in net position of the internal service funds is included in the governmental activities
in the Statement of Activities.
A gain or loss on the disposal of capital assets, including the difference between the carrying value and
any related sale proceeds, is included in the change in net position. However, only the sale proceeds and
insurance recoveries are included in the change fund balances.
Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources (property tax
and special assessment receivables) are not reported as revenues in the funds.
The amount of debt issued is reported in the governmental funds as a source of financing. Debt
obligations are not revenues in the Statement of Activities, but rather constitute long-term liabilities.
Certain expenses are included in the change in net position, but do not require the use of current
funds, and are not included in the change in fund balances.
The recognition of certain revenues and expenditures differ between the full accural governmental
activities financial statements and the modified accrual governmental fund financial statements.
Repayment of long-term debt does not affect the change in net position. However, it reduces fund
balances.
Debt issuance premiums and discounts are included in the change in net position as they are
amortized over the life of the debt. However, they are included in the change in fund balances upon
issuance as other financing sources and uses.
Interest on long-term debt is included in the change in net position as it accrues, regardless of when
payment is due. However, they are included in the change in fund balances when due.
29
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
PROPRIETARY FUNDSDecember 31, 2015
Governmental
Activities
RiskNonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and investments 10,917,561$ 1,111,572$ 1,248,239$ 702,283$ -$ 3,295,595$ 17,275,250$ 54,561$ Restricted cash and investments 459,675 - - 764,439 - - 1,224,114 -
Interest receivable 24,217 2,603 3,137 1,772 - 7,407 39,136 75
Accounts receivable, net 3,672,353 - 4,676 2,855 278,407 153,905 4,112,196 -
Special assessments receivable 549,253 - - - - - 549,253 -
Due from other funds - - - - - 7,103 7,103 - Due from other governments 43,223 - - - - - 43,223 -
Prepaid expenses 412,866 - 82,475 - - - 495,341 -
Inventory 19,336 1,156,845 - 83,710 - 8,651 1,268,542 -
Total current assets 16,098,484 2,271,020 1,338,527 1,555,059 278,407 3,472,661 25,014,158 54,636
Noncurrent assets:
Net capital assets 91,710,823 1,726,898 1,856,113 7,785,699 10,370,902 10,510,105 123,960,540 -
Deferred outlflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 137,916 137,917 - 78,809 59,107 157,619 571,368 -
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 107,947,223 4,135,835 3,194,640 9,419,567 10,708,416 14,140,385 149,546,066 54,636
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 237,569 273,681 997 24,772 50,946 118,898 706,863 - Salaries payable 27,526 26,634 - 17,144 23,483 26,200 120,987 -
Accrued interest payable 370,397 - 2,450 41,365 56,166 - 470,378 -
Contracts payable 310,893 108,774 - 131,532 139,835 467,611 1,158,645 -
Due to other funds - - - - 7,103 - 7,103 -
Due to other governments 6,983 139,789 - 3,967 8,282 11,948 170,969 - Deposits payable - - - 5,000 - - 5,000 -
Unearned revenue - 10,356 - 79,889 317 9,395 99,957 -
Compensated absences payable 62,243 131,352 - 79,700 21,504 48,565 343,364 -
Bonds payable - current 4,925,000 - 80,000 65,000 230,000 - 5,300,000 -
Total current liabilities 5,940,611 690,586 83,447 448,369 537,636 682,617 8,383,266 -
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 52,011 34,682 - 46,653 21,851 37,559 192,756 -
Net pension liability 973,329 973,329 - 556,188 417,141 1,112,376 4,032,363 - Compensated absences payable 93,366 197,028 - 119,550 32,257 72,849 515,050 -
Bonds payable, net of
unamortized discounts and premiums 27,650,397 - 85,539 3,179,202 4,415,077 - 35,330,215 -
Total noncurrent liabilities 28,769,103 1,205,039 85,539 3,901,593 4,886,326 1,222,784 40,070,384 -
Deferred inflows of resources:Defined benefit pension plans 120,099 120,099 - 68,628 51,471 137,256 497,553 -
Total liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources 34,829,813 2,015,724 168,986 4,418,590 5,475,433 2,042,657 48,951,203 -
Net position (deficit):
Net investment in capital assets 59,284,208 1,618,124 1,690,574 5,174,404 5,585,990 10,042,494 83,395,794 -
Restricted for debt service - - 793,664 - - - 793,664 -
Unrestricted 13,833,202 501,987 541,416 (173,427) (353,007) 2,055,234 16,405,405 54,636
Total net position 73,117,410$ 2,120,111$ 3,025,654$ 5,000,977$ 5,232,983$ 12,097,728$ 100,594,863$ 54,636$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
30
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION
PROPRIETARY FUNDSFor The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total ManagementAquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise InternalUtilitiesLiquorCenterCourseArenaFundsFundsService Fund
Operating revenues:
Sales - liquor -$ 12,214,580$ -$ 103,784$ -$ -$ 12,318,364$ -$
Sales - retail - 247,807 4,701 214,288 61,919 46,175 574,890 -
Sales - utilities 17,860,895 - - - - - 17,860,895 - Sales - concessions - - 120,047 37,705 293,733 154,248 605,733 -
Memberships - - 387,731 83,296 242 111,236 582,505 -
Admissions - - 406,488 308,174 107,336 642,349 1,464,347 -
Building rental - - 52,969 88,215 1,709,764 813,480 2,664,428 - Rental of equipment - - - 363,013 4,312 172,633 539,958 -
Greens fees - - - 1,498,474 - 221,618 1,720,092 -
Other fees 1,473,128 - - 160,241 130,679 958,050 2,722,098 -
Total operating revenues 19,334,023 12,462,387 971,936 2,857,190 2,307,985 3,119,789 41,053,310 -
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales and services - 9,415,449 39,162 207,006 122,264 90,024 9,873,905 - Personal services 1,692,682 1,450,762 332,310 1,255,665 863,398 1,752,912 7,347,729 -
Contractual services 7,137,023 531,059 172,126 481,138 804,739 722,758 9,848,843 -
Commodities 859,512 85,922 56,605 238,794 136,765 331,856 1,709,454 -
Central Services 685,750 232,690 26,929 128,895 57,624 136,318 1,268,206 - Depreciation 4,012,165 102,720 241,407 571,105 522,206 402,457 5,852,060 -
Total operating expenses 14,387,132 11,818,602 868,539 2,882,603 2,506,996 3,436,325 35,900,197 -
Operating income (loss)4,946,891 643,785 103,397 (25,413) (199,011) (316,536) 5,153,113 -
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Intergovernmental 210,173 - - - - 250,000 460,173 -
Investment income 55,619 3,278 8,004 6,307 - 18,699 91,907 306 Donations - - - - 56,170 23,400 79,570 -
Interest and fiscal charges (847,003) - (4,961) (61,011) (135,085) - (1,048,060) -
Amortization of bond premiums
(discounts) 270,831 - 540 1,368 (16) - 272,723 - Gain (loss) on sale of capital assets 23,927 - - (467,097) 15,500 - (427,670) -
Assets contributed to governmental
funds - - - (1,008,330) - - (1,008,330) -
Miscellaneous 1,420 6,321 - 48,131 8,868 946 65,686 54,330
Total nonoperating
revenues (expenses)(285,033) 9,599 3,583 (1,480,632) (54,563) 293,045 (1,514,001) 54,636
Income (loss) before transfers 4,661,858 653,384 106,980 (1,506,045) (253,574) (23,491) 3,639,112 54,636
Transfers:
Transfers in - - - 441,871 1,245,070 2,521,831 4,208,772 -
Transfers out (184,476) (785,000) - - - - (969,476) -
Total transfers (184,476) (785,000) - 441,871 1,245,070 2,521,831 3,239,296 -
Change in net position 4,477,382 (131,616) 106,980 (1,064,174) 991,496 2,498,340 6,878,408 54,636
Net position - January 1
as previously reported 69,577,192 3,188,891 2,918,674 6,600,674 4,643,129 10,670,433 97,598,993 - Change in accounting principle (937,164) (937,164) - (535,523) (401,642) (1,071,045) (3,882,538) -
Net position - January 1 as restated 68,640,028 2,251,727 2,918,674 6,065,151 4,241,487 9,599,388 93,716,455 -
Net position - December 31 73,117,410$ 2,120,111$ 3,025,654$ 5,000,977$ 5,232,983$ 12,097,728$100,594,863$ 54,636$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
31
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
GovernmentalActivities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Cash flows from operating activities:Receipts from customers and users 19,271,659$ 12,462,734$ 967,260$ 2,860,294$ 2,265,737$ 3,021,011$ 40,848,695$ -$ Payment to suppliers (8,642,719) (10,079,898) (300,020) (1,048,438) (1,158,385) (1,232,988) (22,462,448) - Payment to employees (1,732,292) (1,469,655) (332,310) (1,249,885) (880,967) (1,805,321) (7,470,430) - Donations received - - - - 56,170 23,400 79,570 - Miscellaneous received 1,420 6,321 - 48,131 8,868 946 65,686 54,330
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities 8,898,068 919,502 334,930 610,102 291,423 7,048 11,061,073 54,330
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:State grant 210,173 - - - - 250,000 460,173 - Transfer from other funds - - - 441,871 1,245,070 2,521,831 4,208,772 - Transfer to other funds (184,476) (785,000) - - - - (969,476) - Proceeds from interfund borrowing - - - - 7,103 22,718 29,821 - Payment of interfund borrowing - - - - - (29,821) (29,821) -
Net cash provided by (used in)
noncapital financing activities 25,697 (785,000) - 441,871 1,252,173 2,764,728 3,699,469 -
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Proceeds from capital debt 5,513,451 - - 2,158,128 - - 7,671,579 -
Acquisition of capital assets (11,977,234) (95,205) (19,454) (2,587,994) (1,198,671) (2,355,336) (18,233,894) -
Proceeds from disposals
of capital assets 102,610 - - 18,000 15,500 - 136,110 -
Principal paid on bonds (12,300,000) - (75,000) (50,000) (225,000) - (12,650,000) - Interest and fiscal charges paid on bonds (882,427) - (6,075) (34,215) (136,517) - (1,059,234) -
Net cash provided by (used in)
capital and related
financing activities (19,543,600) (95,205) (100,529) (496,081) (1,544,688) (2,355,336) (24,135,439) -
Cash flows from investing activities:Interest received 51,251 3,964 6,999 5,185 - 16,415 83,814 231
Net increase (decrease)
in cash and investments (10,568,584) 43,261 241,400 561,077 (1,092) 432,855 (9,291,083) 54,561
Cash and investments -
January 1 21,945,820 1,068,311 1,006,839 905,645 1,092 2,862,740 27,790,447 -
Cash and investments -December 31 11,377,236$ 1,111,572$ 1,248,239$ 1,466,722$ -$ 3,295,595$ 18,499,364$ 54,561$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
32
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
GovernmentalActivities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
Reconciliation of operating income to net cashprovided (used) by operating activities:Operating income (loss) 4,946,891$ 643,785$ 103,397$ (25,413)$ (199,011)$ (316,536)$ 5,153,113$ -$
Adjustments to reconcile operating income
(loss) to net cash flows provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation 4,012,165 102,720 241,407 571,105 522,206 402,457 5,852,060 -
Donations - - - - 56,170 23,400 79,570 -
Miscellaneous revenue (expense) 1,420 6,321 - 48,131 8,868 946 65,686 54,330
Changes in assets, deferred outflows of resources,
liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources:
Decrease (increase) in receivables 65,948 - (4,676) (2,815) (42,251) (98,338) (82,132) -
Decrease (increase) in
special assessments (87,975) - - - - - (87,975) -
Decrease (increase) in
due from other governments (40,337) - - - - - (40,337) -
Decrease (increase) in inventory (12,042) 36,209 - 11,054 - (391) 34,830 -
Decrease (increase) in
prepaid expenses (27,635) - (3,875) - - - (31,510) -
Decrease (increase) in deferred
outflows of resources (98,141) (98,142) - (56,081) (42,061) (112,163) (406,588) -
Increase (decrease) in
accounts payable 77,577 144,890 (1,013) (4,367) (35,488) 46,847 228,446 -
Increase (decrease) in
salaries payable (78,178) (59,861) - (25,481) (29,335) (56,433) (249,288) -
Increase (decrease) in
due to other governments 1,666 4,123 (310) 708 (1,505) 1,512 6,194 -
Increase (decrease) in
unearned revenue - 347 - 5,919 3 (440) 5,829 -
Increase (decrease) in
net OPEB obligation 3,747 3,481 - 4,159 2,026 4,518 17,931 -
Increase (decrease) in
net pension liability (3,610) (3,610) - (2,063) (1,547) (4,125) (14,955) -
Increase (decrease) in
compensated absences 16,473 19,140 - 16,618 1,877 (21,462) 32,646 -
Increase (decrease) in deferred
inflows of resources 120,099 120,099 - 68,628 51,471 137,256 497,553 -
Total adjustments 3,951,177 275,717 231,533 635,515 490,434 323,584 5,907,960 54,330
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities 8,898,068$ 919,502$ 334,930$ 610,102$ 291,423$ 7,048$ 11,061,073$ 54,330$
Noncash investing activities:
Increase (decrease) in
fair value of investments (26,869) (4,289) (2,948) (994) - (7,070) (42,170) (9)
Noncash capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets with
contracts payable 198,329 (62,335) 19,454 (108,712) 596,047 1,204,001 1,846,784 -
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
33
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
AGENCY FUNDS
December 31, 2015
Agency Funds
Assets
Cash and investments 391,362$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 22,310$
Salaries payable 4,265
Due to other governmental units 364,787
Total liabilities 391,362$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
34
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
35
Note 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The City of Edina (the City) was incorporated in 1888 and operates under the State of Minnesota Statutory Plan B form of government. The governing body consists of a five-member City Council
elected by voters of the City.
The financial statements of the City have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles) as
applied to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The following is a summary of significant accounting policies.
A. FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY
The City’s financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, (b)
organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary
government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity’s financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The primary government is financially
accountable for the component unit if it appoints a voting majority of the component unit’s governing body and is able to impose its will on the component unit or there is a potential
for the component unit to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on, the primary government.
As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the
reporting entity include those of the City of Edina (the primary government) and its component units. The component units discussed below are included in the City's
reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationships with the City.
COMPONENT UNITS
In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the component unit have been included in the financial reporting entity as a blended
component unit.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the City. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of
the City’s operations for two reasons. First, the HRA’s governing body is substantively the same as the governing body of the City. Specifically, the HRA board consists of five
members, all of which are City Council members. Second, management of the City has operational responsibility for the HRA. Specifically, sales of bonds or other obligations of
the HRA are approved by the City Council; the HRA follows the budget process for City departments in accordance with City policy; the annual HRA budget is approved by City
Council; the HRA submits its plan for development and redevelopment to the City Council for approval; lastly, the administrative structure and management practices and policies
of the HRA are approved by the City Council. The activity of the HRA is reported in the Special Revenue Funds. Separate financial statements are not prepared for the HRA.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
36
B. GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City.
Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant
extent on fees and charges for support.
The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or business-type activity are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses
are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business-type activity.
Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or
directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or business-type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the
operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business type activity. Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as
general revenues.
Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government-wide
financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated
information for the remaining nonmajor governmental and enterprise funds is reported in a single column in the fund financial statements
C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT
PRESENTATION
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources
measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and
fiduciary fund financial statements. The City’s only fiduciary fund type, agency funds, are custodial in nature and do not have a measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when
earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they
are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial
resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are
considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City
considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded
when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences, other post-
employment benefits (OPEB), net pension liabilities, and claims and judgments are recorded only when payment is due.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
37
Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible
to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is
considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received
by the City.
The City reports the following major governmental funds:
The general fund is the government’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be
accounted for in another fund.
The special revenue Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (property taxes, bond proceeds, investment
earnings, etc.) that are restricted for housing and redevelopment.
The debt service fund accounts for the payment of principal and interest on General Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, Public Project Revenue Bonds, and
Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds.
The capital projects construction fund accounts for the various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for
capital improvements as restricted in the City’s capital improvement budget.
The City reports the following major proprietary funds:
The utility fund accounts for the provision of water, sewer and recycling services to the City’s residents.
The liquor fund accounts for the operation of the City’s three liquor stores.
The aquatic center fund accounts for the operation of the City’s aquatic center.
The golf course fund accounts for the operation of the City’s two golf courses and a
golf dome.
The arena fund accounts for the operation of the City’s ice arena.
Additionally, the City reports the following fund types:
Internal service funds - the risk management internal service fund accounts for worker’s compensation, volunteer accident, and property/casualty insurance. Internal
service funds operate in a manner similar to enterprise funds; however, they provide services primarily to other departments within the City.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
38
Agency funds - the police seizure and Public Safety Training Facility funds account for fees collected for other government agencies and the payroll fund accounts for
payroll deductions withheld from employee paychecks but not yet sent to the appropriate party (includes federal and state taxes, health care deductions, etc).
As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the
government-wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions that would be treated as revenues, expenditures or expenses if they involved external
organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu of taxes, are similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City of Edina. Elimination of these
charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned.
Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for
goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3) capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated
resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes.
Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items.
Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations.
The principal operating revenues of the City’s enterprise funds and internal service fund are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for the enterprise
funds and internal service fund include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting
this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses.
Aggregated information for the internal service fund is reported in a single column in the proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal user of the internal services
is the City’s governmental activities, the financial statements of the internal service funds are consolidated into the governmental column when presented in the government-wide
financial statements. The cost of these services is reported in the appropriate functional activity.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for an allowable use, it is
the City’s policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed.
Depreciation expense is included in the direct expenses of each function. Interest on
long-term debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the Statement of Activities.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
39
D. CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash and Investments The cash balances of the City and its component units fund are pooled and invested for
the purpose of increasing earnings through investment activities. The pool’s investments are reported at fair value at year end, except for investments in 2a7-like external
investment pools, which are stated at amortized cost. The City has the ability and intent to hold its investments to maturity. The individual funds’ portions of the pool’s fair value
are presented as “Cash and investments.” Earnings from such investments are allocated to the respective funds on the basis of applicable cash balance participation by each
fund. The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash and investment balances by means of an advance from another fund shown as interfund
receivables in the advancing fund, and an interfund payable in the fund with the deficit, until adequate resources are received. These interfund balances are eliminated on the
government-wide financial statements.
Restricted Cash and Investments Restricted cash and investments represent bond proceeds held for specific purposes.
Earnings on these investments are allocated directly to these funds.
For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the City considers all highly liquid debt instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the City of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. The proprietary funds’ portion in the government-wide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalent.
E. RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES
During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds
for goods provided or services rendered. Short-term interfund loans are classified as “due to/from other funds.” All short-term interfund receivables and payables at December 31,
2015 are planned to be eliminated in 2016. Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-
wide financial statements as “internal balances.”
Property taxes and special assessments receivables have been reported net of estimated uncollectible accounts. Because utility bills are considered liens on property, no
estimated uncollectible amounts are established. Uncollectible amounts are not material for other receivables and have not been reported.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
40
F. REVENUE RECOGNITION
1. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RECOGNITION
The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in December (levy/assessment date) of each year for collection in the following
year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for itself, the City, the local School District and other taxing authorities. Such taxes
become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date. Real property taxes are payable (by property owners) on May 15 and
October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are payable by taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of each year. These taxes are collected
by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 7 and December 2 of the same year. Delinquent collections for November and December are received the
following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes by property owners. The County possesses this authority.
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes property tax revenue in the period for which the taxes were levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported.
GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current and
delinquent taxes and State credits received by the City in July, December and January are recognized as revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the
County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and taxes and credits not received at the year-end are classified as delinquent and due
from County taxes receivable. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected by the City in January are fully offset by deferred inflows of resources because they
are not available to finance current expenditures.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION
Special assessments are levied against benefited properties for the cost or a portion of the cost of special assessment improvement projects in accordance
with State Statutes. These assessments are collectible by the City over a term of years usually consistent with the term of the related bond issue. Collection of
annual installments (including interest) is handled by the County Auditor in the same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do)
prepay future installments without interest or prepayment penalties.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
41
Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is
determined to be excessive by the City Council or court action. If special assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeit
sale. Pursuant to State Statutes, a property shall be subject to a tax forfeit sale after three years unless it is homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational
land in which event the property is subject to such sale after five years.
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes special assessment revenue in the period that the assessment roll was adopted by the City Council. Uncollectible special
assessments are not material and have not been reported.
GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Revenue from special assessments is recognized by the City when it becomes measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In
practice, current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are recognized as revenue for the current year. Special assessments that are
collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining
delinquent, deferred and special deferred assessments receivable in governmental funds are completely offset by deferred inflows of resources. The
following is a breakdown of special assessments receivable at December 31, 2015:
Enterprise
Funds
Debt
Service Construction Utilities
Special assessments receivable
Delinquent $66,694 $0 $280,896
Deferred 2,653,017 14,960,155 268,357
Total $2,719,711 $14,960,155 $549,253
Governmental Funds
G. INVENTORIES AND PREPAID ITEMS
Inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost and are recorded as expenses when consumed rather than when purchased. All inventories use the first-in/first-out
(FIFO) method.
Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements and
are recorded as expenses when consumed.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
42
H. CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital assets, which include property, buildings, improvements, equipment, parks, infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), and intangible assets
such as easements, are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are also
reported in the proprietary fund financial statements but not in the governmental fund financial statements.
Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of
more than $10,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of three years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if
purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not
add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Infrastructure assets include all of the City’s assets since inception.
Property, plant and equipment of the primary government are depreciated using the
straight line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Assets Life
Golf course 10 - 35 years
Land improvements 15 - 50 years
Buildings and structures 15 - 40 years
Furniture and office equipment 5 - 10 years
Vehicles and equipment 3 - 20 years
Parks 5 - 100 years
Utility infrastructure 20 - 50 years
Capital assets that are not depreciated include land, easements, and construction in
progress.
I. COMPENSATED ABSENCES
It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and
proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee
resignations and retirements. In accordance with the provisions of generally accepted accounting principles no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulating rights to receive
sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized for that portion of accumulating sick leave benefits that is vested as severance pay. According to City policy, vested sick leave
benefits are liquidated into a health care savings plan upon separation.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
43
J. STATE-WIDE PENSION PLANS
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public
Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and additions to/deductions from the PERA’s fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by
the PERA except that the PERA’s fiscal year-end is June 30. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and
refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value.
K. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
In the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund
financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary
fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bond using the straight-line method. Bonds payable are
reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of
debt issued plus any premium received is reported as other financing sources. Discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not
withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures.
L. DEFERRED OUTFLOWS/INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate
section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a
future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The City has one item that qualifies for reporting in this
category. It is the deferred outflows of resources related to pensions reported in the government-wide and enterprise funds Statement of Net Position. This deferred outflow
results from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of assumptions, differences between projected and actual earnings on pension plan
investments, and contributions to the plan subsequent to the measurement date and before the end of the reporting period. These amounts are deferred and amortized as
required under pension standards.
In addition to liabilities, statements of financial position or balance sheets will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial
statement element represents an acquisition of net position that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The City
has two items which qualify for reporting in this category.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
44
The first item, unavailable revenue, is reported only in the governmental funds Balance Sheet. The governmental funds report unavailable revenue from two sources: property
taxes and special assessments. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an inflow of resources in the period the amounts become available.
The second item, deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, is reported in the
government-wide and enterprise fund Statement of Net Position. This deferred inflow results from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of
assumptions, and the difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments. These amounts are deferred and amortized as required under pension
standards.
M. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS
Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for
expenditures/expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund, are recorded as expenditures/expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of
expenditures/expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Interfund loans are reported as an interfund loan receivable or payable which offsets the movement of cash between funds.
All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers.
N. FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATION
In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These
classifications are as follows:
Nonspendable – Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as
prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets.
Restricted – Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state statutory provisions.
Committed – Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by
resolution of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by
taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts.
Assigned – Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the
criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In the general fund, assigned amounts represent intended uses established by the City Council. In the fund
balance policy, authority to assign amounts for specific purposes is limited to the City Council.
Unassigned – The residual classification for the general fund which also reflects negative residual amounts in other funds.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
45
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are
needed.
When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3)
unassigned.
O. NET POSITION
In the government-wide financial statements, net position represents the difference between assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of
resources. Net position is displayed in three components:
Net investment in capital assets - Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated
depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balance of any long-term debt used to build or acquire the capital assets.
Restricted net position – Consists of net position restricted when there are limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors, grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments.
Unrestricted net position – All other net position that do not meet the definition of “restricted” or “net investment in capital assets.”
P. USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect amounts reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from such estimates.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
46
Q. CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the City implemented GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions—an amendment of GASB
Statement No. 27, and GASB Statement No. 71, Pension Transition for Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date—an amendment of GASB Statement No.
68. These statements prescribe major changes in how employers account for pension benefit expenses and liabilities. In financial statements prepared using the economic
resources measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting (government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements), an employer is required to recognize a liability for
its share of the net pension liability provided through the pension plan. An employer is also required to recognize pension expense and report deferred outflows of resources
and deferred inflows of resources for its share related to pensions. These standards required retroactive implementation, which resulted in the restatement of net position as
of December 31, 2014. The net position in the government-wide financial statements as of December 31, 2014 was decreased by $21,451,167. This change reflects the City’s
proportionate share of the net pension liabilities ($22,575,840 decrease in net position) and related deferred outflows of resources ($1,124,673 increase in net position) for the
PERA pension plan, which are now reported by employers under current guidance. Certain amounts necessary to fully restate fiscal year 2014 financial information are not
determinable; therefore, prior year comparative amounts have not been restated.
Note 2 CASH AND INVESTMENTS
A. COMPONENTS OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following:
Deposits 353,806$
Cash on hand 19,015
Investments 65,210,927
65,583,748$
Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows:
Cash and investments - Statement of Net Position 63,384,306$
Restricted cash and investments - Statement of Net Position 1,808,080
Cash and investments - Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 391,362
65,583,748$
The City had restricted investments of $1,808,080 as of December 31, 2015 that
represent unspent bond proceeds to be used for construction projects and debt payments.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
47
B. DEPOSITS
In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at depository banks authorized by the City Council, including checking accounts, savings
accounts and certificates of deposit.
The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits:
Custodial credit risk – In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City’s deposits may be lost.
Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit
insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by federal deposit
insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills, notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated
“A” or better; revenue obligations rated “AA” or better; irrevocable standard letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of
deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an
account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral.
The City’s investment policy does not contain further restrictions on the types of collateral required.
At year-end, the carrying amount of the City’s deposits was $353,806 while the
balance on the bank records was $716,844. At December 31, 2015, all deposits were fully covered by federal depository insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral
held by the City’s agent in the City’s name.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
48
C. INVESTMENTS
The City has the following investments at year end:
Rating Agency < 1 1 to 5 6 to 10 > 10 Total
U.S. Treasuries AA+ S&P -$ -$ 516,475$ 776,299$ 1,292,774$
SBA Notes AA+ S&P 580 68,503 - - 69,083
SBA Notes N/R N/A - - 7,103 11,130 18,233
U.S. Agencies AA+ S&P 330,720 10,758,183 747,507 2,559,411 14,395,821
U.S. Agencies Aaa Mdy's - 329,784 232,192 - 561,976
Bankers Acceptance A1+ S&P 3,877,302 - - - 3,877,302
Commerical Paper A1+ S&P 8,409,108 - - - 8,409,108
Municipals AAA S&P - 139,888 31,226 - 171,114
Municipals AA+ S&P 60,177 1,746,316 - 1,645,000 3,451,493
Municipals Aa3 Mdy's 505,000 - - - 505,000
Municipals AA S&P 252,838 49,961 754,949 - 1,057,748
Municipals AA- S&P 34,955 293,363 - - 328,318
Municipals AA2 Mdy's - 247,865 - - 247,865
Negotiable CD's N/R N/A 14,203,902 9,357,722 - - 23,561,624
27,674,582$ 22,991,585$ 2,289,452$ 4,991,840$ 57,947,459
Money Market* AAAm S&P 462,855
Money Market* AA+ S&P 24,417
4M Fund* N/R N/A 6,776,196
Total investments 65,210,927$
N/A - Not Applicable
N/R - Not Rated
* - The City's money market investments do not have maturities
Credit Risk
Investment
Interest Risk - Maturity Duration in Years
The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is regulated by Minnesota
Statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is an external investment pool not registered with the Securities Exchange Commission
(SEC) that follows the same regulatory rules of the SEC under rule 2a7. The City’s investment in the 4M Fund is measured at the net asset value per share provided by the
pool, which is based on an amortized cost method that approximates fair value.
Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most significant:
Custodial credit risk – For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a
failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker-dealer) the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral
securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The City’s investment policy specifically addresses custodial credit risk, requiring the City to limit its
exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of who holds the securities.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
49
Credit risk – This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City’s investments to
direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment
Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the
investments have a final maturity of thirteen months or less; general obligations rated “AA” or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency rated “A” or better; bankers’ acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by
United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and
maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United
States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest categories; repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending
agreements with financial institutions qualified as a “depository” by the government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System
with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, that are a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain
Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The City’s investment policies specifically address credit risk, further limiting the City’s exposure to credit risk by requiring
that all state and local government obligations to be rated “AA” or better by a national rating agency.
Concentration risk – This is the risk associated with investing a significant
portion of the City’s investment (considered 5 percent or more) in the securities of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as Treasuries),
investment pools, and mutual funds. The City’s investment policies specifically address the City’s desire to limit concentration risk, but do not set specific
guidelines for measurement of this risk. At year-end, the City’s investments include 18.8% in bankers’ acceptances and commercial paper with U.S. Bank,
and 10.3% in securities issued by FNMA.
Interest rate risk – This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed rate investment resulting in changes in interest rates (the longer the period for
which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The City’s investment policies specifically address the City’s desire to limit interest rate risk, but do not set
specific guidelines for measurement of this risk.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
50
Note 3 CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2015 is as follows:
Beginning Ending
Balance Increases Decreases Balance
Governmental activities:
Capital assets not being depreciated:
Land 20,190,409$ 803,624$ -$ 20,994,033$
Easements 111,000 142,000 - 253,000
Construction in progress 16,623,018 15,844,525 (11,114,022) 21,353,521
Total capital assets not being depreciated 36,924,427 16,790,149 (11,114,022) 42,600,554
Capital assets being depreciated:
Land improvements 22,966,330 179,277 - 23,145,607
Buildings and structures 63,799,864 204,706 - 64,004,570
Furniture and office equipment 4,008,251 186,055 (8,523) 4,185,783
Vehicles and equipment 15,636,160 1,201,172 (612,850) 16,224,482
Infrastructure 98,211,440 8,705,752 (527,972) 106,389,220
Parks 15,828,183 2,102,075 (62,043) 17,868,215
Total capital assets being depreciated 220,450,228 12,579,037 (1,211,388) 231,817,877
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Land improvements (16,052,239) (707,813) - (16,760,052)
Buildings and structures (18,368,626) (1,819,054) - (20,187,680)
Furniture and office equipment (2,769,388) (275,165) 8,523 (3,036,030)
Vehicles and equipment (10,618,468) (1,262,516) 412,840 (11,468,144)
Infrastructure (52,526,424) (2,764,821) 527,972 (54,763,273)
Parks (8,959,781) (706,319) 58,277 (9,607,823)
Total accumulated depreciation (109,294,926) (7,535,688) 1,007,612 (115,823,002)
Total capital assets being depreciated, net 111,155,302 5,043,349 (203,776) 115,994,875
Governmental activities capital assets, net 148,079,729$ 21,833,498$ (11,317,798)$ 158,595,429$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
51
Beginning Ending
Balance Increases Decreases Balance
Business-type activities:
Capital assets not being depreciated:
Land 1,088,965$ -$ (803,624)$ 285,341$
Construction in progress 16,365,190 15,168,785 (12,316,388) 19,217,587
Total capital assets not being depreciated 17,454,155 15,168,785 (13,120,012) 19,502,928
Capital assets being depreciated:
Land improvements & golf course 9,819,284 185,129 (1,340,045) 8,664,368
Buildings and structures 27,337,511 7,327,893 (742,868) 33,922,536
Furniture and office equipment 153,303 - - 153,303
Vehicles and equipment 10,673,944 1,469,484 (402,837) 11,740,591
Utility infrastructure 114,481,228 4,552,208 - 119,033,436
Lease property capital lease 430,614 - - 430,614
Total capital assets being depreciated 162,895,884 13,534,714 (2,485,750) 173,944,848
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Land improvements & golf course (6,262,654) (315,526) 859,361 (5,718,819)
Buildings and structures (13,103,099) (1,207,570) 538,162 (13,772,507)
Furniture and office equipment (141,423) (4,830) - (146,253)
Vehicles and equipment (4,778,924) (710,091) 319,740 (5,169,275)
Utility infrastructure (40,635,725) (3,614,043) - (44,249,768)
Lease property capital lease (430,614) - - (430,614)
Total accumulated depreciation (65,352,439) (5,852,060) 1,717,263 (69,487,236)
Total capital assets being depreciated, net 97,543,445 7,682,654 (768,487) 104,457,612
Business-type activities capital assets, net 114,997,600$ 22,851,439$ (13,888,499)$ 123,960,540$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
52
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the primary government as follows:
Governmental activities:
General government 481,297$
Public safety 1,074,179
Public works 4,003,581
Parks 1,976,631
Total depreciation expense - governmental activities 7,535,688$
Business-type activities:
Utilities 4,012,165$
Liquor 102,720
Aquatic Center 241,407
Golf Course 571,105
Arena 522,206
Sports Dome 162,302
Art Center 25,717
Edinborough Park 175,223
Centennial Lakes 39,215
Total depreciation expense - business-type activities 5,852,060$
CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS
At December 31, 2015, the City had construction project contracts in progress. The commitments
related to the remaining contract balances are summarized as follows:
Contract Remaining
Project # Project Description Amount Commitment
13-10NB Eng Lake Edina Landscape 14,930$ 2,724$
14-8 Eng Promenade Water Feature 1,445,573 63,074
14-14 Eng France Ave Landscape Plan 579,979 71,478
15-1NB Eng Valley View Landscaping 36,542 5,441
15-3 Eng Glen View Neighborhood 8,421,439 444,268
15-5 Eng Hollands Neighborhood 1,492,807 68,577
15-13 Eng Interlachen Boulevard 376,015 73,069
NA Pamela Park Shelter and Turf 262,095 425
15-12 Eng Industrial Park Lighting 234,793 9,206
Various Braemar Golf Course 1,800,499 40,000
Various Braemar Arena 1,363,870 8,545
Various Braemar Field 1,756,265 2,976
789,783$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
53
Note 4 LONG-TERM DEBT
The City has five types of bonded debt outstanding at December 31, 2015: general obligation bonds, permanent improvement revolving bonds, public project revenue bonds, Edina emerald
energy program revenue bonds and G.O. revenue bonds. The first type is payable from general property taxes. The second type is payable solely from special assessments with any deficiency
to be provided for by general property taxes. The third type is payable solely from annual appropriation lease payments received from the City of Edina pursuant to a lease between the
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City. The fourth type is payable solely from special assessments. The fifth type is payable primarily from enterprise revenue with any
deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The reporting entity’s long-term debt is segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be
repaid from business-type activities.
GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
As of December 31, 2015, the governmental long-term bonded debt of the financial reporting entity consisted of the following:
Final
Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable
Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2015
General Obligation Bonds:
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2007A 4.00-4.25% 5/24/2007 2/1/2028 5,865,000$ 4,315,000$
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2009A 3.00-4.40% 4/29/2009 2/1/2030 14,000,000 11,300,000
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2010A 2.00-4.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2021 8,285,000 4,860,000
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2013A - Refunding 3.00-3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 5,710,000 5,130,000
General Obligation - 2014B - Refunding 3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2017 1,105,000 1,105,000
Total General Obligation Bonds 34,965,000 26,710,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds:
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2010B 2.00-3.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2022 2,305,000 1,660,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2011A 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2023 3,320,000 2,715,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2029 2,675,000 2,535,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A - Refunding 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2019 1,990,000 1,325,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2013A 3.00-3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 2,555,000 2,555,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2014B - Refunding 2.00-3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2020 4,075,000 4,075,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2015A 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2032 6,545,000 6,545,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2015A - Parking 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2036 2,495,000 2,495,000
Total PIR Bonds 25,960,000 23,905,000
Public Project Revenue Bonds:
Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10-4.55% 11/24/2009 2/1/2030 2,595,000 1,645,000
Public Project Revenue, Series 2014A 2.00-3.625% 7/15/2014 2/1/2035 16,155,000 16,155,000
Public Project Revenue, Series 2015A - Refunding 2.50-3.00% 7/9/2015 5/1/2026 3,490,000 3,490,000
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 22,240,000 21,290,000
Edina Emerald Energy Program (EEEP) Revenue Bonds:
Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds, 2012A 7.00% 2/25/2012 1/1/2023 33,690 23,583
Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds, 2012B 5.50% 8/28/2012 1/1/2018 40,030 16,012
Total EEEP Bonds 73,720 39,595
Total bonded indebtedness - governmental activities 83,238,720$ 71,944,595$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
54
BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES
Final
Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable
Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2015
Revenue Bonds:
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B 2.00-3.00% 4/29/2009 1/1/2017 2,010,000$ 165,000$
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009C 2.00-4.00% 12/10/2009 2/1/2030 2,440,000 1,960,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B .45-1.60% 11/15/2012 2/1/2020 815,000 580,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00-3.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2033 2,100,000 2,100,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00-3.45% 10/10/2013 2/1/2029 1,125,000 1,075,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2015B 2.00-3.25% 7/9/2015 2/1/2031 2,140,000 2,140,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2022 11,230,000 8,150,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2023 6,100,000 5,090,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00-3.00% 7/15/2014 2/1/2024 5,680,000 5,110,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2017 1,830,000 1,830,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2019 5,710,000 5,710,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2025 5,235,000 5,235,000
Total Revenue Bonds 46,415,000 39,145,000
Total bonded indebtedness - business-type activities 46,415,000$ 39,145,000$
Annual debt service requirements to maturity for the City’s bonds are as follows:
Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest
2016 2,410,000$ 943,193$ 1,925,000$ 705,628$ 900,000$ 654,479$
2017 2,475,000 859,818 2,105,000 628,625 905,000 633,629
2018 1,990,000 782,343 2,480,000 562,538 1,045,000 607,198
2019 2,065,000 710,270 2,415,000 493,938 1,080,000 574,566
2020 2,145,000 634,400 2,250,000 433,975 1,115,000 540,690
2021-2025 7,980,000 2,206,856 5,925,000 1,534,913 6,100,000 2,178,700
2026-2030 7,645,000 744,451 4,825,000 732,707 5,145,000 1,269,158
2031-2035 - - 1,810,000 139,856 5,000,000 459,166
2036 - - 170,000 3,188 - -
Total 26,710,000$ 6,881,331$ 23,905,000$ 5,235,368$ 21,290,000$ 6,917,586$
Principal Interest Principal Interest
2016 -$ 2,870$ 5,300,000$ 1,045,523$
2017 11,375 2,193 5,540,000 889,583
2018 11,375 1,517 4,635,000 755,964
2019 3,369 1,061 4,775,000 633,318
2020 3,369 825 3,355,000 523,915
2021-2025 10,107 1,062 12,120,000 1,280,124
2026-2030 - - 2,720,000 322,223
2030-2033 - - 700,000 26,769
Total 39,595$ 9,528$ 39,145,000$ 5,477,419$
Bonds
Business-type Activities
Revenue
Year Ending
December 31
Year Ending
December 31
Governmental Activities
Edina Emerald Energy Program
Revenue Bonds
Governmental Activities
General Public Improvement
Obligation Bonds Revolving Bonds
Public Project
Revenue Bonds
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
55
CHANGE IN LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Long-term liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2015, was as follows:
Change in
Beginning Accounting Ending Due Within
Balance Principle (1)Additions Reductions Balance One Year
Governmental activities:
Bonds payable:
General obligation 30,200,000$ -$ -$ (3,490,000)$ 26,710,000$ 2,410,000$
PIR 20,880,000 - 9,040,000 (6,015,000) 23,905,000 1,925,000
Public project revenue 21,560,000 - 3,490,000 (3,760,000) 21,290,000 900,000
EEEP revenue 50,970 - - (11,375) 39,595 -
Less deferred amounts:
Discount on bonds (428,166) - (47,815) 42,273 (433,708) -
Premiums 1,594,192 - 492,838 (257,140) 1,829,890 -
Total bonds payable 73,856,996 - 12,975,023 (13,491,242) 73,340,777 5,235,000
Compensated absences 3,850,518 - 1,911,251 (1,893,275) 3,868,494 1,547,398
Net pension liability - PERA - 18,528,522 5,857,523 (5,483,348) 18,902,697 -
Governmental activity
Long-term liabilities 77,707,514$ 18,528,522$ 20,743,797$ (20,867,865)$ 96,111,968$ 6,782,398$
Business-type activities:
Bonds payable:
Revenue bonds 44,420,000$ -$ 7,375,000$ (12,650,000)$ 39,145,000$ 5,300,000$
Less deferred amounts:
Discount on bonds (114,440) - (33,621) 15,782 (132,279) -
Premiums 1,575,799 - 330,200 (288,505) 1,617,494 -
Total bonds payable 45,881,359 - 7,671,579 (12,922,723) 40,630,215 5,300,000
Compensated absences 825,768 - 312,975 (280,329) 858,414 343,364
Net pension liability - PERA - 4,047,318 986,996 (1,001,951) 4,032,363 -
Business-type activity
Long-term liabilities 46,707,127$ 4,047,318$ 8,971,550$ (14,205,003)$ 45,520,992$ 5,643,364$
(1) Change in accounting principle to implement GASB Statements No. 68 and 71 described elsewhere in these notes.
For governmental activities, compensated absences and net pension liability are generally liquidated by the general fund.
Employees earn pension benefits as members of a state-wide pension plan administered by
the PERA, the details of which are discussed elsewhere in the notes.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
56
In 2014, the City issued $12,720,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2014B to finance a current refunding of the 2016 through 2017 maturities of the City’s $5,375,000 General
Obligation bonds, Series 2005A, the 2016 through 2017 maturities of the City’s $8,210,000 General Obligation utility revenue bonds, Series 2007B, the 2016 through 2019 maturities of
the City’s $13,985,000 General Obligation utility revenue bonds, Series 2008A, and the 2016 through 2020 maturities of the City’s $7,755,000 General Obligation permanent improvement
revolving fund bonds, Series 2008B. Savings from the current proceeds were not placed in escrow. The General Obligation bonds, Series 2005A, Series 2007B, Series 2008A, and
Series 2008B were redeemed on February 1, 2015. The current refunding was undertaken to reduce total debt service payments by $933,960 and resulted in an economic gain of
$915,095. The City anticipates that ad valorem taxes, utility revenues, and special assessments to benefited properties will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this
issuance.
In 2015, the HRA issued $3,490,000 of HRA public project revenue bonds, Series 2015A to finance a current refunding of the 2016 through 2026 maturities of the City’s $5,425,000 HRA
public project revenue bonds, series 2005A. Savings from the current proceeds were not placed in escrow and the HRA public project revenue bonds, series 2005A were redeemed
on August 3, 2015. The current refunding was undertaken to reduce total debt service payments by $345,061 and resulted in an economic gain of $307,988. The HRA anticipates
that annual appropriation lease payments will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this issuance.
REVENUE PLEDGED
Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows:
% of Total Remaining Principal Pledged
Debt Term of Principal and Interest Revenue
Bond Issue Use of Proceeds Type Service Pledge and Interest Paid Received
2009B Recreational Facility Bonds Pool improvement Pool 100% 2009-2017 170,025$ 81,075$ 971,936$
2009C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2010-2030 2,589,325 175,725 2,307,985
2012B Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2013-2020 598,368 131,999 2,307,985
2012C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2013-2033 2,733,297 53,794 2,307,985
2013B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf dome improvements Golf 100% 2014-2029 1,331,207 84,215 2,857,190
2015B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf course improvements Golf 100% 2016-2031 2,710,706 - 2,857,190
2011A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2012-2022 8,937,225 1,275,200 19,334,023
2012A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2013-2023 5,777,575 727,150 19,334,023
2014A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2014-2024 5,742,025 707,754 19,334,023
2014B Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2014-2019 7,946,200 144,517 19,334,023
2015A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2016-2025 6,086,463 - 19,334,023
Revenue Pledged Current Year
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
57
Note 5 LEGAL DEBT MARGIN
The City is subject to a statutory limitation by the State of Minnesota for bonded indebtedness payable principally from property taxes. The City of Edina's legal debt margin for 2015 is
computed as follows:
December 31, 2015
Market Value (after fiscal disparities) 9,701,676,898$
Debt Limit (3% of Market Value) 291,050,307$
Amount of debt applicable to debt limit:
Total bonded debt 111,089,595$
Less:
Public improvement revolving bonds (23,905,000)
Revenue bonds (39,145,000)
EEEP revenue bonds (39,595)
Total debt applicable to debt limit 48,000,000$
Legal debt margin 243,050,307$
Note 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
The City participates in the following cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit pension plans administered by the PERA. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are
established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401 (a)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
1. General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF)
All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City are covered by the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF). GERF members belong to either the
Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and Basic Plan members are not. The Basic Plan was closed to new
members in 1967. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
58
2. Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF)
The PEPFF, originally established for police officers and firefighters not covered by a local relief association, now covers all police officers and firefighters hired since
1980. Effective July 1, 1999, the PEPFF also covers police officers and firefighters belonging to local relief associations that elected to merge with and transfer assets
and administration to the PERA.
B. BENEFITS PROVIDED
The PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are established by state statute and can only be modified by the State Legislature.
Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Increases are related
to the funding ratio of the plan. Members in plans that are at least 90 percent funded for two consecutive years are given 2.5 percent increases. Members in plans that have not
exceeded 90 percent funded, or have fallen below 80 percent, are given 1 percent increases.
The benefit provisions stated in the following paragraphs of this section are current
provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at
the time they last terminated their public service.
1. GERF Benefits
Benefits are based on a member’s highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two
methods are used to compute benefits for the PERA’s Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step-rate benefit accrual
formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2 percent of average salary for
each of the first 10 years of service and 2.7 percent for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2 percent of average salary
for each of the first 10 years and 1.7 percent for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7 percent of average salary for Basic Plan members
and 1.7 percent for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of
service equal 90 and normal retirement age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the age for unreduced Social Security benefits
capped at 66.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
59
2. PEPFF Benefits
Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2010, but before July 1, 2014, vest on a prorated basis from 50 percent after five years up to 100 percent after 10
years of credited service. Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2014, vest on a prorated basis from 50 percent after 10 years up to 100 percent after
20 years of credited service. The annuity accrual rate is 3 percent of average salary for each year of service. For PEPFF members who were first hired prior to July 1,
1989, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal at least 90.
C. CONTRIBUTIONS
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions. Contribution rates can only be modified by the State Legislature.
1. GERF Contributions
Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 6.50 percent of their annual
covered salary in calendar year 2015. The City was required to contribute 7.50 percent for Coordinated Plan members in calendar year 2015. The City’s
contributions to the GERF for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $1,248,845. The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state
statute.
2. PEPFF Contributions
Plan members were required to contribute 10.8 percent of their annual covered salary in calendar year 2015. The City was required to contribute 16.20 percent of
pay for PEPFF members in calendar year 2015. The City’s regular contributions to the PEPFF for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $1,268,476. The City’s
contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute.
D. PENSION COSTS
1. GERF Pension Costs
At December 31, 2015, the City reported a liability of $13,765,652 for its proportionate share of the GERF’s net pension liability. The net pension liability was
measured as of June 30, 2015, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s
proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by the PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from
July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the PERA’s participating employers. At June 30, 2015, the City’s
proportionate share was .2683 percent, which was a decrease of .0288 percent from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2014.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
60
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the City recognized pension expense of $1,495,832 for its proportionate share of the GERF’s pension expense.
At December 31, 2015, the City reported its proportionate share of the GERF’s
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Deferred
Outflows Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience –$ 694,023$
Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 1,303,129 –
Changes in proportion – 1,004,515
Contributions paid to the PERA subsequent to the measurement
date 647,405 –
Total 1,950,534$ 1,698,538$
$647,405 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting
from city contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2016. Other
amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Pension
Year Ended Expense
December 31, Amount
2016 (240,397)$
2017 (240,397)$
2018 (240,397)$
2019 325,782$ 2. PEPFF Pension Costs At December 31, 2015, the City reported a liability of $9,169,408 for its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2015, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportion of the net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by the PERA during the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the PERA’s participating employers. At June 30, 2015, the City’s proportion was .807 percent, which was a decrease of .004 percent from its proportion measured as of June 30, 2014.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
61
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the City recognized pension expense of $1,572,121 for its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s pension expense. The City
also recognized $72,630 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as revenue for its proportionate share of the state of Minnesota’s on-behalf contributions to the PEPFF.
Legislation passed in 2013 required the state of Minnesota to begin contributing $9 million to the PEPFF each year, starting in fiscal year 2014.
At December 31, 2015, the City reported its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Deferred
Outflows Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience –$ 1,486,978$
Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 1,597,618 –
Changes in proportion – 36,002
Contributions paid to the PERA subsequent to the measurement
date 666,767 –
Total 2,264,385$ 1,522,980$
$666,767 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from city contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a
reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2016. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions
will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Pension
Year Ended Expense
December 31, Amount
2016 94,809$
2017 94,809$
2018 94,809$
2019 94,809$
2020 (304,598)$
E. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
The total pension liability in the June 30, 2015 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions:
Inflation 2.75% per year
Active member payroll growth 3.50% per year
Investment rate of return 7.90%
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
62
Salary increases were based on a service-related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, survivors, and disabilitants were based on RP-2000 tables for males
or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments. Cost of living benefit increases for retirees are assumed to be: 1 percent effective every January 1st until 2034, then 2.5
percent for GERF and PEPFF.
Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2015, valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. The experience study in the GERF was for the period July
1, 2004 through June 30, 2008, with an update of economic assumptions in 2014. The experience study for the PEPFF was for the period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2009.
There were no changes in actuarial assumptions in 2015.
The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments is 7.9 percent. The
State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of the PERA, prepares an analysis of the reasonableness of the long-term expected rate of return on a regular basis
using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce
an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of
arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table:
Asset Class
Target
Allocation
Long-Term Expected
Real Rate of Return
Domestic stocks 45% 5.50%
International stocks 15% 6.00%
Bonds 18% 1.45%
Alternative assets 20% 6.40% Cash 2% 0.50%
F. DISCOUNT RATE The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 7.9 percent. The projection
of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that employee and employer contributions will be made at the rate specified in statute. Based on that assumption, each of
the pension plan’s fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive employees. Therefore, the long-term
expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
63
G. PENSION LIABILITY SENSITIVITY
The following presents the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for all plans it participates in, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as
well as what the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate 1 percentage point lower or 1 percentage point higher than
the current discount rate:
1% Decrease in 1% Increase in
Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate
(6.9%) (7.9%) (8.9%)
The City’s proportionate share of the
GERF net pension liability 21,644,497$ 13,765,652$ 7,258,935$
The City’s proportionate share of the
PEPFF net pension liability 17,871,273$ 9,169,408$ 1,980,152$
H. PENSION PLAN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in a separately-issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required
supplementary information. That report may be obtained on the PERA website at www.mnpera.org.
Note 7 OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
The City provides post-employment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees through City’s Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan, a single-employer defined benefit
plan administered by the City. All post-employment benefits are based on contractual agreements with employee groups. These contractual agreements do not include any
specific contribution or funding requirements. These benefits are summarized as follows:
Post-Employment Insurance Benefits – All retirees of the City have the option under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the City
from the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare. For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full
premium to continue coverage for medical and dental insurance.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
64
The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether
the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree. Consequently, participating retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an “implicit rate
subsidy.” This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if
purchasing insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the City’s younger and statistically healthier active employees.
B. FUNDING POLICY
The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements,
with additional amounts to pre-fund benefits as determined annually by the City. Historically the City has chosen pay-as-you-go financing for OPEB, generally this liability
is liquidated by all funds that employ full-time employees on a pro-rata basis.
C. ANNUAL OPEB COST AND NET OPEB OBLIGATION
The City’s annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on annual required contributions (ARC) of the City, an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis
in accordance with the parameters of codification Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The ARC represents a level funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal
costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a period not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the City’s
annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the changes in the City’s net OPEB obligation to the plan:
Annual required contribution 316,720$
Interest on net OPEB obligation 77,390
Adjustment to annual required contribution (64,928)
Annual OPEB cost (expense) 329,182
Contributions made (119,780)
Increase in net OPEB obligation 209,402
Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year 1,719,772
Net OPEB obligation - end of year 1,929,174$ The City’s annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the
plan, and the net OPEB obligation for the past three years are as follows:
Percentage of
Fiscal Annual Employer Annual OPEB Net OPEB
Year Ended OPEB Cost Contribution Cost Contributed Obligation
December 31, 2013 319,144$ 92,934$ 29.1% 1,487,975$
December 31, 2014 318,242 86,445 27.2% 1,719,772
December 31, 2015 329,182 119,780 36.4% 1,929,174
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
65
D. FUNDED STATUS AND FUNDING PROGRESS
As of January 1, 2014, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan was zero percent funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $3,026,848, and the
actuarial value of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $3,026,848. The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered
by the plan) was $20,305,179, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 14.9 percent.
Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported
amounts and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare
cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and ARCs of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past
expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule of Funding Progress immediately following the notes to the basic financial statements presents multi-
year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits.
E. ACTUARIAL METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan
(the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of
benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the
effects of short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations.
In the January 1, 2014 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method
was used. The actuarial assumptions included: a 4.5 percent investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses) based on the City’s own investments; a 3.0 percent
general inflation rate, a payroll growth rate of 3.75 percent, and an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 9.0 percent initially, reduced by decrements to an ultimate rate of 5.0
percent after twelve years. The UAAL is being amortized as a level percentage of payroll. The remaining amortization period at January 1, 2014 was 30 years on an “open” basis.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
66
Note 8 INTERFUND RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES, AND TRANSFERS
The composition of due from other funds and due to other funds account balances as of December 31, 2015, is as follows:
Payable Fund Amount
Sports Dome Arena 7,103$
Receivable Fund
The City’s interfund receivable and payable eliminates what would have been a negative cash balance.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
67
Governmental Debt Nonmajor
Activities Service Construction Golf Course Arena Enterprise Total
Transfer out:
General Fund -$ -$ 1,848,294$ -$ -$ -$ 1,848,294$
Construction Fund - 1,000,000 - - 1,045,070 2,321,533 4,366,603
Utilities Fund - - 184,476 - - - 184,476
Liquor Fund - - 200,000 285,000 200,000 100,000 785,000
Golf Course Fund 1,008,330 - - - - - 1,008,330
Nonmajor Governmental - - - 156,871 - 100,298 257,169
1,008,330$ 1,000,000$ 2,232,770$ 441,871$ 1,245,070$ 2,521,831$ 8,449,872$
Transfer In:
Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit from services provided by another fund. Some of the City’s interfund transfers fall under that
category. Non-routine transfers include the following:
1. The liquor fund transferred $285,000, $200,000 and $100,000 to the golf course fund,
arena, and art center funds, respectively, to subsidize operations. 2. The construction fund transferred $125,574 and $30,486 to the arena and edinborough
park funds, respectively, to subsidize capital improvements to those facilities. 3. The environmental efficiency fund transferred $100,298 to the edinborough fund to
subsidize capital improvements. 4. The construction fund transferred $919,496 and $2,291,047, respectively, to the arena
and sports dome funds to reimburse for debt proceeds initially received in the construction fund for capital projects at those facilities.
5. The utilities fund and liquor fund transferred $100,000 and $200,000, respectively, to the construction fund to fund the capital improvement program, as planned in the 2015
budget. 6. The general fund transferred $708,294 of the 2014 unassigned fund balance to the
construction fund to subsidize the capital improvement program. 7. The general fund transferred $1,140,000 to the construction fund for use of park reserves
from the parkland dedication money received in 2014 and 2015. 8. The braemar memorial fund transferred $156,871 to the golf course fund to subsidize
capital improvements. 9. The utilities fund transferred $84,476 to the construction fund to fund a portion of the
Utley park well house project. 10. The construction fund transferred $1,000,000 of PIR assessment revenue to the debt
service fund for related debt payments. 11. The golf course fund contributed land and buildings from the now closed Fred Richards
golf course to the governmental activities capital assets; the assets have a net book value of $1,008,330.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
68
Note 9 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
The Housing Redevelopment Authority and City of Edina are the administering authorities for the following Tax Increment Districts:
District number 1208 (Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District) is an economic development
district established in 2012 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2022.
District number 1211 (Pentagon Park Increment Financing District) is an economic development district established in 2014 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2043.
The following table reflects values as of December 31, 2015:
TIF #1208 TIF #1211 Total
Original tax capacity 8,772,449$ 902,428$ 9,674,877$
Current tax capacity 12,000,565 902,428 12,902,993
Fiscal Disparities 734,748 - 734,748
Tax capacity change 2,493,368 - 2,493,368
Captured tax capacity value:
Retained captured tax capacity 2,493,368$ -$ 2,493,368$
Note 10 CONTINGENCIES
A. RISK MANAGEMENT
The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters.
Worker’s compensation insurance was provided through the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust. There is no deductible. The City has an annual deposit premium that is subject to adjustment based on the actual audited payroll.
A package policy; including property, general liability, and automobile coverage, is
provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Under this policy, the City pays an annual premium and had a $50,000 per occurrence deductible and is
subject to an annual aggregate deductible of $100,000, with a $1,500,000 per occurrence maximum.
Liquor liability coverage is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage and has a $1,000,000 annual maximum.
Settlement claims have not exceeded insurance coverage for each of the past three
years. While there were no significant decreases in insurance coverage during 2015, there were significant increases in insurance coverage.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
69
B. LITIGATION
The City attorney has indicated that existing and pending lawsuits, claims and other actions in which the City is a defendant are either covered by insurance; of an immaterial
amount; or, in the judgment of the City attorney, remotely recoverable by plaintiffs.
C. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS
The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in the form of grants. The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally
requires compliance with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreements and is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any disallowed claims resulting from such
audits could become a liability of the applicable fund. However, in the opinion of management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the
financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial position of the City at December 31, 2015.
D. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
The City’s tax increment districts are subject to review by the State of Minnesota Office of
the State Auditor (OSA). Any disallowed claims or misuse of tax increments could become a liability of the applicable fund. Management is not aware of any instances of
noncompliance which would have a material effect on the financial statements.
Note 11 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATION
As of December 31, 2015, the City of Edina had five series of Housing and Health Care Revenue
Bonds, with an aggregate principal amount payable of $51,595,000. The bonds are payable solely from revenues of the respective organizations and do not constitute an indebtedness of the
City, and are not a charge against its general credit or taxing power. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements.
Note 12 JOINT VENTURE
The City is a participant with the City of Bloomington, the City of Eden Prairie and the Metropolitan Airport Commission in a joint venture to construct and operate a facility to be used
for the training of law enforcement officers and firefighters. The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Association (PSTF) is governed by a Board consisting of one representative from
each Member. On dissolution of the Association, the Facility shall revert to the City of Edina, and all remaining assets shall be divided among the members based on the Cost Sharing Formula. In
accordance with the joint venture agreement, each member of the association will share in the cost of the construction and operation based on the Cost Sharing Formula. The City’s equity
interest in the capital assets of the PSTF was $1,584,465. Complete financial statements for PSTF can be obtained from the City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
70
Note 13 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The City pays an annual membership fee to the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility as part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the Police and Fire
departments and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the City paid a total of $53,027 in membership fees to the PSTF.
The City also pays an annual membership fee to the I-494 Corridor Commission as part of the
joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the commissions and projects department and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2015,
the City paid a total of $14,765 in membership fees to the I-494 Corridor Commission.
Note 14 FUND BALANCES
A. Classifications
At December 31, 2015, a summary of the City’s governmental fund balance classifications
are as follows:
General Fund HRA Fund Debt Service Construction
Nonmajor
Funds Total
Nonspendable
Prepaid items 529,513$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 529,513$
Restricted
Park dedication 417,673 - - - - 417,673
Tax increments - 8,021,960 - - - 8,021,960
Debt service - - 7,134,575 - - 7,134,575
Unspent bond proceeds - - - 222,461 - 222,461
Pedestrian and cyclist improvements - - - - 713,168 713,168
Energy efficiency projects - - - - 328,671 328,671
Forfeitures - - - - 440,065 440,065
Grant funds - - - - 85,588 85,588
Arts and culture - - - - 2,748 2,748
Donations - - - - 142,228 142,228
Total Restricted 417,673 8,021,960 7,134,575 222,461 1,712,468 17,509,137
Assigned
Compensated absences 1,547,398 - - - - 1,547,398
Construction commitments - - - 738,262 - 738,262
Special projects - - - 1,518,567 - 1,518,567
Equipment - - - 2,761,731 - 2,761,731
PIR - - - 3,070,057 - 3,070,057
Construction - - - 5,039,264 - 5,039,264
Total Assigned 1,547,398 - - 13,127,881 - 14,675,279
Unassigned 11,825,799 - - - - 11,825,799
Total Fund Balance 14,320,383$ 8,021,960$ 7,134,575$ 13,350,342$ 1,712,468$ 44,539,728$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2015
71
B. Unassigned Fund Balance Policy
The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned fund balance for the general fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned
general fund balance of 42%-47% of the subsequent year’s budgeted property tax revenue. As of December 31, the City has $11,825,799 of unassigned fund balance in the general
fund, or 47.3% of 2016 budgeted property tax revenue. This amount is $64,542 above the goal range identified in the policy.
72
This page left blank intentionally.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Revenues:
Taxes:
General property taxes 23,255,958$ 22,810,958$ 22,822,441$ 11,483$
Franchise taxes 770,000 770,000 833,229 63,229
Lodging tax - - 22,716 22,716
Total taxes 24,025,958 23,580,958 23,678,386 97,428
Licenses and permits: 3,230,080 3,830,080 4,827,634 997,554
Intergovernmental:
Federal: 36,000 36,000 184,418 148,418
State:
Municipal state aid 195,000 195,000 246,744 51,744
Other 42,500 42,500 147,189 104,689
State aid - police 320,000 320,000 378,177 58,177
State aid - fire 420,000 420,000 402,247 (17,753)
Health programs 100,000 100,000 118,919 18,919
Total intergovernmental 1,113,500 1,113,500 1,477,694 364,194
Charges for services:
Administration - - 67,816 67,816
Communications & Technology 115,349 115,349 93,325 (22,024)
Finance 661,680 661,680 651,625 (10,055)
Public Works 69,000 69,000 103,020 34,020
Engineering 418,400 418,400 197,379 (221,021)
Police 341,490 341,490 591,917 250,427
Fire 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,116,106 116,106
Parks & Recreation 278,275 278,275 344,294 66,019
Community Development 85,300 85,300 61,208 (24,092)
Total charges for services 3,969,494 3,969,494 4,226,690 257,196
Fines and forfeits 950,000 950,000 1,033,116 83,116
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 150,000 150,000 78,713 (71,287)
Rental of property 450,000 450,000 416,522 (33,478)
Parkland dedication - - 800,000 800,000
Other 11,100 11,100 69,139 58,039
Total miscellaneous 611,100 611,100 1,364,374 753,274
Total revenues 33,900,132 34,055,132 36,607,894 2,552,762
Budgeted Amounts
73
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Expenditures:
General government:
Administration:
Personal services 805,914$ 805,914$ 877,672$ 71,758$
Contractual services 710,100 690,100 574,084 (116,016)
Commodities 17,000 17,000 26,192 9,192
Central services 106,224 106,224 103,343 (2,881)
Total administration 1,639,238 1,619,238 1,581,291 (37,947)
Communications & technology:
Personal services 620,803 620,803 638,422 17,619
Contractual services 303,935 303,935 308,090 4,155
Commodities 46,000 46,000 40,810 (5,190)
Central services 69,936 69,936 65,958 (3,978)
Total communications & technology 1,040,674 1,040,674 1,053,280 12,606
Human Resources:
Personal services 635,243 635,243 823,603 188,360
Contractual services 38,250 38,250 19,731 (18,519)
Commodities 2,500 2,500 1,014 (1,486)
Central services 19,644 19,644 18,380 (1,264)
Total human resources 695,637 695,637 862,728 167,091
Finance:Personal services 630,730 630,730 484,177 (146,553)
Contractual services 212,700 212,700 223,253 10,553
Commodities 4,500 4,500 12,707 8,207
Central services 56,988 56,988 55,467 (1,521)
Total finance 904,918 904,918 775,604 (129,314)
Community development:
Personal services 1,276,864 1,276,864 1,243,885 (32,979)
Contractual services 206,720 206,720 138,458 (68,262)
Commodities 8,900 8,900 2,283 (6,617)
Central services 119,676 119,676 114,219 (5,457)
Total community development 1,612,160 1,612,160 1,498,845 (113,315)
Total general government 5,892,627 5,872,627 5,771,748 (100,879)
Public safety:
Police:
Personal services 8,144,312 8,144,312 7,970,349 (173,963)
Contractual services 957,500 957,500 985,312 27,812
Commodities 92,215 92,215 84,480 (7,735)
Central services 1,163,388 1,163,388 1,103,307 (60,081)
Total police 10,357,415 10,357,415 10,143,448 (213,967)
Fire:
Personal services 5,694,114 5,774,114 5,862,955 88,841
Contractual services 507,600 515,600 518,838 3,238
Commodities 205,400 212,400 311,557 99,157 Central services 505,284 505,284 477,514 (27,770)
Total fire 6,912,398 7,007,398 7,170,864 163,466
Total public safety 17,269,813 17,364,813 17,314,312 (50,501)
Budgeted Amounts
74
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Budgeted Amounts
Public works:
Public works:
Personal services 4,445,240$ 4,445,240$ 4,414,046$ (31,194)$
Contractual services 1,182,350 1,182,350 1,265,694 83,344
Commodities 1,289,900 1,289,900 1,332,576 42,676
Central services 1,542,120 1,542,120 1,415,277 (126,843)
Total public works 8,459,610 8,459,610 8,427,593 (32,017)
Engineering:
Personal services 1,422,195 1,502,195 1,342,034 (160,161)
Contractual services 87,000 87,000 82,932 (4,068)
Commodities 31,000 31,000 22,041 (8,959)
Central services 114,900 114,900 106,874 (8,026)
Total engineering 1,655,095 1,735,095 1,553,881 (181,214)
Total public works 10,114,705 10,194,705 9,981,474 (213,231)
Parks:
Parks & recreation:
Personal services 963,359 963,359 912,346 (51,013)
Contractual services 275,439 275,439 289,949 14,510
Commodities 68,877 68,877 84,649 15,772 Central services 80,412 80,412 78,476 (1,936)
Total parks & recreation 1,388,087 1,388,087 1,365,420 (22,667)
Total parks 1,388,087 1,388,087 1,365,420 (22,667)
Total expenditures 34,665,232 34,820,232 34,432,954 (387,278)
Revenues over (under) expenditures (765,100) (765,100) 2,174,940 2,940,040
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfer from other funds 765,100 - - -
Transfer to other funds - (1,848,294) (1,848,294) -
Total financing sources (uses) 765,100 (1,848,294) (1,848,294) -
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance -$ (2,613,394)$ 326,646 2,940,040$
Fund balance - January 1 13,993,737
Fund balance - December 31 14,320,383$
75
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA) FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Tax increment collections 100,000$ 100,000$ 1,792,896$ 1,692,896$
Investment income 94,000 94,000 27,564 (66,436)
Charges for services - - 44,308 44,308
Total revenues 194,000 194,000 1,864,768 1,670,768
Expenditures:
Personal services 118,467 118,467 120,415 1,948
Contractual services 6,120 6,120 305,879 299,759
Commodities 200 200 422 222
Capital outlay - 3,685,000 1,346,090 (2,338,910)
Total expenditures 124,787 3,809,787 1,772,806 (2,036,981)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 69,213$ (3,615,787)$ 91,962 3,707,749$
Fund balance - January 1 7,929,998
Fund balance - December 31 8,021,960$
Budgeted Amounts
76
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN
SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Unfunded Unfunded
Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability as a
Valuation Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered Percentage of
Date Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll Payroll
January 1, 2010 2,966,250$ -$ 2,966,250$ 0.0% 17,786,616$ 16.7%
January 1, 2012 2,959,876$ -$ 2,959,876$ 0.0% 18,220,189$ 16.2%
January 1, 2014 3,026,848$ -$ 3,026,848$ 0.0% 20,305,179$ 14.9%
77
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
12/31/2015 6/30/2015 0.2683% 13,765,652$ 16,651,642$ 82.67% 78.20%
12/31/2015 6/30/2015 1,248,845$ 1,248,845$ –$ 16,651,642$ 7.50%
Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This information is not
available for previous fiscal years.
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
PERA Fiscal
Year End Date
(Measurement
Date)
City's Covered
Payroll (b)
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
PERA Fiscal
Year End Date
(Measurement
Date)
Statutorily
Required
Contributions
(a)
Contribution
Deficiency
(Excess) (a-b)
City's
Proportion of
the Net
Pension
Liability
City's
Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability
(a)
City's Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll (a/b)
Plan Fiduciary Net
Position as a
Percentage of the
total Pension Liability
Contributions in
Relation to the
Statutorily
Required
Contributions (b)
Schedule of Employer Contributions
Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
Covered Payroll (d)
Contributions as a
Percentage of
Covered Payroll (b/d)
78
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
12/31/2015 6/30/2015 0.8070% 9,169,408$ 7,797,803$ 117.59% 86.60%
12/31/2015 6/30/2015 1,268,476$ 1,268,476$ –$ 7,797,803$ 16.27%
Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This information is not
available for previous fiscal years.
Schedule of Employer Contributions
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
PERA Fiscal
Year End Date
(Measurement
Date)
Statutorily
Required
Contributions
(a)
Contributions in
Relation to the
Statutorily
Required
Contributions (b)
Contribution
Deficiency
(Excess) (a-b) Covered Payroll (d)
Contributions as a
Percentage of
Covered Payroll (b/d)
Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
PERA Fiscal
Year End Date
(Measurement
Date)
City's
Proportion of
the Net
Pension
Liability
City's
Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability
(a)
City's Covered
Payroll (b)
City's Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll (a/b)
Plan Fiduciary Net
Position as a
Percentage of the
total Pension Liability
79
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
December 31, 2015
80
Note A LEGAL COMPLIANCE – BUDGETS
The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the preceding
schedules:
1. The City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures
and the means of financing them.
2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments.
3. The budget is legally enacted by the passage of a resolution by the City Council.
4. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year.
5. Budgets for the General Fund, HRA, debt service, construction, CDBG, police special revenue, Braemar memorial, PACS, arts & culture, and environmental efficiency funds are
adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
6. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by Council-approved supplemental appropriations and budget transfers.
7. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department in the General Fund
unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year-end.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
December 31, 2015
81
Note B EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS
The General Fund is legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund. The following is a listing of General Fund departments whose
expenditures exceed budget appropriations.
Final Over
Budget Actual Budget
General Fund
General Government
Communications & technology 1,040,674$ 1,053,280$ 12,606$
Human resources 695,637 862,728 167,091
Public Safety
Fire 7,007,398 7,170,864 163,466 Excess expenditures in the General Fund communications & technology services department are due
to an increase in salaries primarily related to an increase in hours worked by interns throughout 2015.
Excess expenditures in the General Fund human resources department are due to an increase in salaries related to two factors. First, the payroll specialist, previously within the finance department,
was reallocated here during 2014, with the change not being reflected until the 2016-2017 biennial budget. Second, severance pay for governmental employees was over budget; it is run through the
human resources department and is difficult to budget for.
The HRA, debt service, construction, CDBG, police special revenue, and braemar memorial, PACS, arts & culture, and environmental efficiency funds budgets are legally adopted on a basis consistent
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the fund level for these funds. The following is a listing of funds whose
expenditures exceed budget appropriations.
Final Over
Budget Actual Budget
Debt Service Fund 6,654,894$ 15,651,988$ 8,997,094$
Construction Fund 13,604,692 17,353,602 3,748,910
Police SR Fund 61,000 380,532 319,532
Arts and Culture Fund 22,907 25,902 2,995
Excess expenditures in the debt service fund are due to unbudgeted refunding’s of debt.
Excess expenditures in the construction fund is the result of unbudgeted projects, with expenditures offset by alternative funding sources such as intergovernmental funding and state aid maintenance.
Excess expenditures in the Police SR fund are due to unbudgeted purchases of capital equipment
related to the E911 call system and dispatch center.
Excess expenditures in arts and culture fund are due to more being spent on public art and music in Edina than anticipated.
82
This page left blank intentionally.
A Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue
sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes.
The following are nonmajor special revenue funds:
Community Development Block Grant Fund - This fund was established to
account for funds received under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974.
Police Special Revenue Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
received for specific purposes within the police department, including
E-911 and forfeiture funds.
Braemar Memorial Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing the Braemar golf course
with equipment and amenities that might not otherwise be affordable or viewed
as a necessity to the golf course.
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund - This fund was established to account for
funds received from gas and electric franchise fees to be used for pedestrian
and cyclist improvements included in future street reconstruction projects.
Arts and Culture Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing public arts and culture related
activities.
A Capital Project Fund is used to account for and report financial resources
used for the acquisition of capital assets.
The following is a nonmajor capital project fund:
Environmental Efficiency Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
received through energy cost savings to be reinvested in future energy efficiencies.
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds
Capital Project Funds
83
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2015
Capital
Projects
Community Police Pedestrian Total Nonmajor
Development Special Braemar and Cyclist Arts and Environmental GovernmentalBlock Grant Revenue Memorial Safety Culture Efficiency Funds
Assets
Cash and investments -$ 516,833$ 141,494$ 431,575$ 2,788$ 340,014$ 1,432,704$
Accrued interest - - 734 2,000 7 1,846 4,587
Accounts receivable - - - 292,117 - - 292,117
Due from other governments 78,360 9,338 - 49,778 91 - 137,567 Total assets 78,360$ 526,171$ 142,228$ 775,470$ 2,886$ 341,860$ 1,866,975$
Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of
Resources, and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 78,360$ 518$ -$ 54,620$ 47$ 1,910$ 135,455$
Salaries payable - - - 1,708 - - 1,708
Contracts payable - - - 5,974 - 11,279 17,253
Total liabilities 78,360 518 - 62,302 47 13,189 154,416
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue - taxes - - - - 91 - 91
Fund balance:
Restricted - 525,653 142,228 713,168 2,748 328,671 1,712,468
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources,
and fund balance 78,360$ 526,171$ 142,228$ 775,470$ 2,886$ 341,860$ 1,866,975$
Special Revenue
84
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Capital
Projects
Community Police Pedestrian Total Nonmajor
Development Special Braemar and Cyclist Arts and Environmental Governmental
Block Grant Revenue Memorial Safety Culture Efficiency Funds
Revenues:
General property taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 20,000$
Franchise taxes - - - 1,154,534 - - 1,154,534
Intergovernmental 97,390 - - 88,691 - - 186,081
Fines and forfeitures - 162,155 - - - - 162,155
Investment income - 22 1,544 5,252 - - 6,818
Other revenues - - 2,973 49,778 3,066 - 55,817
Total revenues 97,390 162,177 4,517 1,298,255 23,066 - 1,585,405
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 97,390 - - - - - 97,390
Public safety - 206,581 - - - - 206,581
Public works - - - 171,622 - - 171,622
Parks - - 15,641 - 25,902 - 41,543
Capital Outlay:
Public safety - 173,951 - - - 22,516 196,467
Public works - - - 1,142,961 - 367,441 1,510,402
Parks - - - - - - -
Total expenditures 97,390 380,532 15,641 1,314,583 25,902 389,957 2,224,005
Revenues over (under)
expenditures - (218,355) (11,124) (16,328) (2,836) (389,957) (638,600)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers out - - (156,871) - - (100,298) (257,169)
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance - (218,355) (167,995) (16,328) (2,836) (490,255) (895,769)
Fund balance -
January 1 - 744,008 310,223 729,496 5,584 818,926 2,608,237
Fund balance -
December 31 -$ 525,653$ 142,228$ 713,168$ 2,748$ 328,671$ 1,712,468$
Special Revenue
85
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Intergovernmental 100,000$ 100,000$ 97,390$ (2,610)$
Expenditures:
Current:
Contractual services 100,000 100,000 97,390 (2,610)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance -$ -$ - -$
Fund balance - January 1 -
Fund balance - December 31 -$
Budgeted Amounts
86
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Intergovernmental 115,325$ 115,325$ -$ (115,325)$
Fines and forfeiture 57,821 57,821 162,155 104,334
Investment income 300 300 22 (278)
Total revenues 173,446 173,446 162,177 (11,269)
Expenditures:
Current:
Contractual services 56,000 56,000 96,488 40,488
Commodities 5,000 5,000 110,093 105,093
Capital outlay - - 173,951 173,951
Total expenditures 61,000 61,000 380,532 319,532
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 112,446$ 112,446$ (218,355) (330,801)$
Fund balance - January 1 744,008
Fund balance - December 31 525,653$
Budgeted Amounts
87
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - BRAEMAR MEMORIAL
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Investment income 200$ 200$ 1,544$ 1,344$
Donations 7,000 7,000 2,973 (4,027)
Total revenues 7,200 7,200 4,517 (2,683)
Expenditures:
Current:
Contractual services - - 15,641 15,641
Capital outlay 275,000 240,000 - (240,000)
Total expenditures 275,000 240,000 15,641 (224,359)
Revenues over (under) expenditures (267,800) (232,800) (11,124) 221,676
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers out - - (156,871) (156,871)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (267,800)$ (232,800)$ (167,995) 64,805$
Fund balance - January 1 310,223
Fund balance - December 31 142,228$
Budgeted Amounts
88
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Franchise taxes 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,154,534$ (45,466)$
Intergovernmental - - 88,691 88,691
Investment income - - 5,252 5,252
Other revenues - - 49,778 49,778
Total revenues 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,298,255 98,255
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services - - 1,684 1,684
Contractual services 23,000 23,000 72,310 49,310
Commodities 28,000 28,000 15,884 (12,116)
Central services 81,744 81,744 81,744 -
Capital outlay 1,100,000 1,418,559 1,142,961 (275,598)
Total expenditures 1,232,744 1,551,303 1,314,583 (236,720)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (32,744)$ (351,303)$ (16,328) 334,975$
Fund balance - January 1 729,496
Fund balance - December 31 713,168$
Budgeted Amounts
89
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - ARTS AND CULTURE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes -$ 20,000$ 20,000$ -$
Other revenues - 23,000 3,066 (19,934)
Total revenues - 43,000 23,066 (19,934)
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services - - 274 274
Contractual services - 21,057 24,554 3,497
Commodities - 1,850 1,074 (776)
Total expenditures - 22,907 25,902 2,995
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance -$ 20,093$ (2,836) (22,929)$
Fund balance - January 1 5,584
Fund balance - December 31 2,748$
Budgeted Amounts
90
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Expenditures:
Current:
Capital outlay -$ 518,951$ 389,957$ (128,994)$
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers out - - (100,298) (100,298)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance -$ (518,951)$ (490,255) 28,696$
Fund balance - January 1 818,926
Fund balance - December 31 328,671$
Budgeted Amounts
91
This page left blank intentionally.
92
Debt Service Fund - This fund was established to account for the payment of
principal and interest on the General Obligation, Permanent Improvement
Revolving, Public Project Revenue, and Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds.
Construction Fund - This fund was established to account for various special
assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides
financing for capital improvements as designated in the City's capital
improvement budget.
MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
93
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GOVERNMENTAL FUND - DEBT SERVICE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 3,960,980$ 5,128,980$ 5,085,348$ (43,632)$
Special assessments 2,083,699 2,083,699 47,491 (2,036,208)
Investment income 20,000 20,000 945 (19,055)
Total revenues 6,064,679 7,232,679 5,133,784 (2,098,895)
Expenditures:
Debt Service 6,179,315 6,654,894 15,651,988 8,997,094
Revenues over (under) expenditures (114,636) 577,785 (10,518,204) (11,095,989)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in - - 1,000,000 1,000,000
Bonds issued - - 361,315 361,315
Refunding bonds issued - - 3,490,000 3,490,000
Premium on bonds issued - - 150,346 150,346
Discount on bonds issued - - (27,173) (27,173)
Total other financing
sources (uses) - - 4,974,488 4,974,488
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (114,636)$ 577,785$ (5,543,716) (6,121,501)$
Fund balance - January 1 12,678,291
Fund balance - December 31 7,134,575$
Budgeted Amounts
94
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GOVERNMENTAL FUND - CONSTRUCTION
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 1,192,072$ 1,617,072$ 1,607,481$ (9,591)$
Franchise taxes 100,000 100,000 101,275 1,275
Special assessments 1,361,088 1,909,298 4,084,637 2,175,339
License and permits 25,000 50,000 79,730 29,730
Intergovernmental 880,000 3,725,000 4,430,191 705,191
Charges for services 50,000 50,000 143,993 93,993
Investment income 62,900 62,900 81,274 18,374
Other revenues - 580,000 236,469 (343,531)
Total revenues 3,671,060 8,094,270 10,765,050 2,670,780
Expenditures:
Personal services 106,559 106,559 120,094 13,535
Contractual services 146,721 146,721 344,381 197,660
Commodities 71,720 71,720 28,363 (43,357)
Central services - - 1,158 1,158
Capital outlay 10,200,412 13,279,692 16,859,606 3,579,914
Total expenditures 10,525,412 13,604,692 17,353,602 3,748,910
Revenues over (under) expenditures (6,854,352) (5,510,422) (6,588,552) (1,078,130)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 300,000 300,000 2,232,770 1,932,770
Transfers out (1,596,700) (327,178) (4,366,603) (4,039,425)
Sale of capital assets - - 78,509 78,509
Insurance recovery - - 167,167 167,167
Bonds issued 3,619,200 4,599,895 8,678,685 4,078,790
Premium on bonds issued - - 342,492 342,492
Discount on bonds issued - - (20,642) (20,642)
Total other financing
sources (uses) 2,322,500 4,572,717 7,112,378 2,539,661
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (4,531,852)$ (937,705)$ 523,826 1,461,531$
Fund balance - January 1 12,826,516
Fund balance - December 31 13,350,342$
Budgeted Amounts
95
This page left blank intentionally.
96
Enterprise funds account for the financing of self-supporting activities of
governmental units which render services to the general public on a user charge
basis. The following are nonmajor enterprise funds:
Art Center Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the City's Art Center.
Edinborough Park Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to Edinborough
Park.
Centennial Lakes Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to
Centennial Lakes Park.
Sports Dome Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the
Sports Dome.
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
Enterprise Funds
97
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
December 31, 2015
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and investments 296,362$ 1,835,756$ 754,375$ 409,102$ 3,295,595$
Interest receivable 726 4,480 2,201 - 7,407
Accounts receivable - 7,721 - 146,184 153,905
Due from other funds - - - 7,103 7,103
Inventory 8,651 - - - 8,651
Total current assets 305,739 1,847,957 756,576 562,389 3,472,661
Noncurrent assets:
Net capital assets 114,400 1,244,438 291,045 8,860,222 10,510,105
Deferred outflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 39,405 59,107 39,405 19,702 157,619
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 459,544 3,151,502 1,087,026 9,442,313 14,140,385
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 15,368 24,580 12,227 66,723 118,898
Salaries payable 4,254 13,722 7,586 638 26,200
Contracts payable - 143,584 - 324,027 467,611
Due to other governments 1,041 8,349 261 2,297 11,948
Unearned revenue 9,365 30 - - 9,395
Compensated absences payable 6,820 9,382 32,363 - 48,565
Total current liabilities 36,848 199,647 52,437 393,685 682,617
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 6,923 15,373 15,263 - 37,559
Net pension liability 278,094 417,141 278,094 139,047 1,112,376
Compensated absences payable 10,231 14,074 48,544 - 72,849
Total noncurrent liabilities 295,248 446,588 341,901 139,047 1,222,784
Deferred inflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 34,314 51,471 34,314 17,157 137,256
Total liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources 366,410 697,706 428,652 549,889 2,042,657
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 114,400 1,100,854 291,045 8,536,195 10,042,494
Unrestricted (21,266) 1,352,942 367,329 356,229 2,055,234
Total net position 93,134$ 2,453,796$ 658,374$ 8,892,424$ 12,097,728$
98
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES
AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Operating revenues:
Sales - retail 46,175$ -$ -$ -$ 46,175$
Sales - concessions 113 124,761 29,374 - 154,248
Memberships 21,467 89,769 - - 111,236
Admissions - 636,834 - 5,515 642,349
Building rental - 244,465 109,467 459,548 813,480
Rental of equipment - 12,060 160,573 - 172,633
Greens fees - - 221,618 - 221,618
Class registration & other fees 448,674 228,984 279,991 401 958,050
Total operating revenues 516,429 1,336,873 801,023 465,464 3,119,789
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales and services 17 75,116 14,891 - 90,024
Personal services 460,511 661,123 587,012 44,266 1,752,912
Contractual services 82,767 297,821 164,067 178,103 722,758
Commodities 69,581 133,441 116,913 11,921 331,856
Central Services 34,990 51,649 49,679 - 136,318
Depreciation 25,717 175,223 39,215 162,302 402,457
Total operating expenses 673,583 1,394,373 971,777 396,592 3,436,325
Operating income (loss) (157,154) (57,500) (170,754) 68,872 (316,536)
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Intergovernmental - - - 250,000 250,000
Investment income 2,314 11,409 4,976 - 18,699
Donations 11,303 - 12,097 - 23,400
Miscellaneous - 946 - - 946
Total nonoperating
revenues (expenses) 13,617 12,355 17,073 250,000 293,045
Income (loss) before transfers (143,537) (45,145) (153,681) 318,872 (23,491)
Transfers:
Transfers in 100,000 130,784 - 2,291,047 2,521,831
Change in net position (43,537) 85,639 (153,681) 2,609,919 2,498,340
Net position - January 1
as previously reported 404,432 2,769,799 1,079,816 6,416,386 10,670,433
Change in accounting principle (267,761) (401,642) (267,761) (133,881) (1,071,045)
Net position - January 1 as restated 136,671 2,368,157 812,055 6,282,505 9,599,388
Net position - December 31 93,134$ 2,453,796$ 658,374$ 8,892,424$ 12,097,728$
99
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Cash flows from operating activities:Receipts from customers and users 516,169$ 1,337,705$ 803,468$ 363,669$ 3,021,011$
Payment to suppliers (183,078) (569,098) (341,155) (139,657) (1,232,988) Payment to employees (460,062) (710,807) (590,731) (43,721) (1,805,321)
Donations received 11,303 - 12,097 - 23,400
Miscellaneous received - 946 - - 946
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (115,668) 58,746 (116,321) 180,291 7,048
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
State Grant - - - 250,000 250,000
Transfer from other funds 100,000 130,784 - 2,291,047 2,521,831
Proceeds from interfund borrowing - 22,718 - - 22,718
Payment of interfund borrowing - - - (29,821) (29,821)
Net cash provided by noncapital
financing activities 100,000 153,502 - 2,511,226 2,764,728
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets - (34,481) (38,440) (2,282,415) (2,355,336)
Cash flows from investing activities:Interest received 1,872 9,984 4,559 - 16,415
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and investments (13,796) 187,751 (150,202) 409,102 432,855
Cash and investments - January 1 310,158 1,648,005 904,577 - 2,862,740
Cash and investments - December 31 296,362$ 1,835,756$ 754,375$ 409,102$ 3,295,595$
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities:
Operating income (loss) (157,154)$ (57,500)$ (170,754)$ 68,872$ (316,536)$
Adjustments to reconcile operating loss
to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation 25,717 175,223 39,215 162,302 402,457
Donations 11,303 - 12,097 - 23,400
Miscellaneous revenue (expense) - 946 - - 946
Changes in assets, deferred outflows of resources,
liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources:
Decrease (increase) in receivables - 832 2,625 (101,795) (98,338) Decrease (increase) in inventory (391) - - - (391)
Decrease (increase) in deferred outflowsof resources (28,041) (42,061) (28,041) (14,020) (112,163)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 4,490 (10,959) 5,240 48,076 46,847 Increase (decrease) in salaries payable (11,118) (26,603) (16,636) (2,076) (56,433)
Increase (decrease) in due toother governments 178 (112) (845) 2,291 1,512
Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue (260) - (180) - (440)
Increase (decrease) in net OPEB obligation 1,268 1,646 1,604 - 4,518
Increase (decrease) in net pension liability (1,031) (1,547) (1,031) (516) (4,125)
Increase (decrease) in
compensated absences 5,057 (32,590) 6,071 - (21,462)
Increase (decrease) in deferred inflows
of resources 34,314 51,471 34,314 17,157 137,256
Total adjustments 41,486 116,246 54,433 111,419 323,584
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (115,668)$ 58,746$ (116,321)$ 180,291$ 7,048$
Noncash investing activities:
Increase (decrease) in
fair value of investments (428) (4,223) (2,419) - (7,070)
Noncash noncapital financing activities:Acquisition of capital assets with
contracts payable - (139,589) 25,040 1,318,550 1,204,001
100
Agency funds are used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial
capacity. The following are agency funds:
Police Seizure Fund - This fund accounts for assets seized by the Police
Department.
Public Safety Training Facility - This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the
South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, which is a joint venture that the City has
fiduciary responsibilities for.
Payroll Fund - This fund accounts for assets withheld from employee paychecks
that the City plans to remit to various third parties, including state & local
governments, insurance providers, and others.
FIDUCIARY FUNDS
Agency Funds
101
This page left blank intentionally.
102
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
AGENCY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Balance Balance
January 1 Additions Deductions December 31
POLICE SEIZURE
Assets:
Cash and investments 707$ -$ -$ 707$
Liabilities:
Due to other governmental units 707$ -$ -$ 707$
PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY
Assets:
Cash and investments 370,007$ 646,685$ 641,077$ 375,615$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 7,037$ 297,887$ 297,654$ 7,270$
Salaries payable 13,050 244,329 253,114 4,265
Due to other governmental units 349,920 104,469 90,309 364,080
Total Liabilities 370,007$ 646,685$ 641,077$ 375,615$
PAYROLL
Assets:
Cash and investments 19,293$ 18,797,406$ 18,801,659$ 15,040$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 19,293$ 18,797,406$ 18,801,659$ 15,040$
TOTALS - ALL AGENCY FUNDS
Assets:
Cash and investments 390,007$ 19,444,091$ 19,442,736$ 391,362$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 26,330$ 19,095,293$ 19,099,313$ 22,310$
Salaries payable 13,050 244,329 253,114 4,265
Due to other governmental units 350,627 104,469 90,309 364,787
Total Liabilities 390,007$ 19,444,091$ 19,442,736$ 391,362$
103
This page left blank intentionally.
104
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TAX CAPACITY, TAX LEVIES AND TAX CAPACITY RATES
(shown by year of tax collectibility)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Total tax capacity 109,012,566$ 106,529,983$ 108,069,277$ 117,907,214$ 125,663,820$
Increment valuation (3,917,958) (4,194,083) (4,948,237) (1,618,920) (2,493,368)
Contribution to fiscal
disparities pool (10,283,433) (8,831,694) (9,513,808) (9,626,075) (10,679,187)
Tax capacity used
for rate calculation 94,811,175 93,504,206 93,607,232 106,662,219 112,491,265
Fiscal disparities distribution 3,068,256 2,615,313 2,548,571 2,540,472 2,636,381
Adjusted net tax capacity 97,879,431$ 96,119,519$ 96,155,803$ 109,202,691$ 115,127,646$
Tax levies:
General fund 21,604,402$ 21,824,894$ 22,509,403$ 22,933,958$ 25,023,952$
Arts & culture fund - - - 20,000 20,000
Equipment 992,072 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 1,680,000
Debt service 3,040,890 3,314,581 3,325,597 4,510,380 4,503,521
Total certified tax levies 25,637,364 26,131,547 26,827,072 29,081,410 31,227,473
Referendum market value levy 610,862 615,837 627,800 618,600 571,650
Total levy 26,248,226$ 26,747,384$ 27,454,872$ 29,700,010$ 31,799,123$
Tax capacity rate:
General fund revenue 23.131 23.762 24.458 22.477 23.223
Bonds & interest 3.116 3.454 3.462 4.128 3.914
Total tax capacity rate 26.247 27.216 27.920 26.605 27.137
Market value rate 0.00667 0.00690 0.00695 0.00631 0.00550
105
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTACOMBINED SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS
December 31, 2015
Final
Interest Maturity Original
Rates Date Date Issue Redeemed
General Obligation Bonds:
GO Park & Recreation Refunding Bonds,
Series 2005A 3.50 - 4.00 07/19/05 02/01/17 5,375,000 3,680,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2007A 4.00 - 4.25 05/24/07 02/01/28 5,865,000 1,300,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2009A 3.00 - 4.40 04/29/09 02/01/30 14,000,000 2,130,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2010A 2.00 - 4.00 11/18/10 02/01/21 8,285,000 2,720,000 GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2013A -
Refunding 3.00 - 3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 5,710,000 310,000 GO Refunding, Series 2014B 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/17 1,105,000 -
Total General Obligation Bonds 40,340,000 10,140,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds:
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2008B 3.00 - 4.00 08/28/08 02/01/20 7,755,000 2,750,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2010B 2.00 - 3.00 11/18/10 02/01/22 2,305,000 425,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00 10/27/11 02/01/23 3,320,000 300,000 GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2012A 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/29 2,675,000 -
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2012A - Refunding 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/19 1,990,000 320,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2013A 3.00 - 3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 2,555,000 - GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2014B - Refunding 2.00 - 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/20 4,075,000 -
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2015A 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/32 - -
GO Permanent Improvement RevolvingSeries 2015A - Parking 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/36 - -
Total PIR Bonds 24,675,000 3,795,000
Public Project Revenue Bonds:
Public Project Revenue, Series 2005 3.00 - 4.13 09/13/05 05/01/26 5,425,000 1,665,000 Taxable Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10 - 4.55 11/24/09 02/01/30 2,595,000 950,000
HRA Public Project Revenue, Series 2014A 2.00 - 3.625 07/15/14 02/01/35 16,155,000 -
HRA Public Project Revenue, Series 2015A -Refunding 2.50 - 3.00 07/09/15 05/01/26 - -
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 24,175,000 2,615,000
Edina Emerald Energy Program Revenue Bonds:
Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012A 7.00 02/25/12 01/01/23 33,690 6,738 Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012B 5.50 08/28/12 01/01/18 40,030 16,012
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 73,720 22,750
Revenue Bonds:
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B 2.00 - 3.00 04/29/09 01/01/17 2,010,000 1,770,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009C 2.00 - 4.00 12/10/09 02/01/30 2,440,000 380,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B .45 - 1.60 11/15/12 02/01/20 815,000 110,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00 - 3.00 11/15/12 02/01/33 2,100,000 -
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00 - 3.45 10/10/13 02/01/29 1,125,000 -
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2015B 2.00 - 3.25 07/09/15 02/01/31 - -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B 4.00 05/24/07 02/01/17 8,210,000 5,430,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A 3.00 - 4.00 08/28/08 02/01/19 13,985,000 6,640,000 Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00 10/27/11 02/01/22 11,230,000 2,015,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/23 6,100,000 470,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00 - 3.00 07/15/14 02/01/24 5,680,000 -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/17 1,830,000 -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/19 5,710,000 - Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/25 - -
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 61,235,000 16,815,000
Total - Bonded indebtedness 150,498,720$ 33,387,750$
Prior Years
106
Principal Interest Interest
Outstanding Payable Due Due Payable
12/31/2014 Issued Payments 12/31/2015 In 2016 In 2016 to Maturity
1,695,000 - 1,695,000 - - - -
4,565,000 - 250,000 4,315,000 260,000 171,744 1,263,785
11,870,000 - 570,000 11,300,000 590,000 418,324 3,736,508
5,565,000 - 705,000 4,860,000 730,000 179,800 606,400
5,400,000 - 270,000 5,130,000 280,000 148,425 1,241,413 1,105,000 - - 1,105,000 550,000 24,900 33,225
30,200,000 - 3,490,000 26,710,000 2,410,000 943,193 6,881,331
5,005,000 - 5,005,000 - - - -
1,880,000 - 220,000 1,660,000 225,000 38,950 160,475
3,020,000 - 305,000 2,715,000 315,000 65,350 309,550
2,675,000 - 140,000 2,535,000 145,000 79,250 583,275
1,670,000 - 345,000 1,325,000 355,000 45,900 97,700
2,555,000 - - 2,555,000 140,000 73,900 619,326
4,075,000 - - 4,075,000 745,000 102,275 275,775
- 6,545,000 - 6,545,000 - 215,061 2,156,424
- 2,495,000 - 2,495,000 - 84,942 1,032,843
20,880,000 9,040,000 6,015,000 23,905,000 1,925,000 705,628 5,235,368
3,760,000 - 3,760,000 - - - - 1,645,000 - - 1,645,000 - 66,810 540,619
16,155,000 - - 16,155,000 615,000 490,869 5,806,654
- 3,490,000 - 3,490,000 285,000 96,800 570,313
21,560,000 3,490,000 3,760,000 21,290,000 900,000 654,479 6,917,586
26,952 - 3,369 23,583 - 1,769 7,547 24,018 - 8,006 16,012 - 1,101 1,981
50,970 - 11,375 39,595 - 2,870 9,528
240,000 - 75,000 165,000 80,000 3,750 5,025
2,060,000 - 100,000 1,960,000 105,000 72,775 629,325
705,000 - 125,000 580,000 125,000 6,249 18,368
2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - 53,794 633,297
1,125,000 - 50,000 1,075,000 65,000 32,490 256,208
- 2,140,000 - 2,140,000 - 62,228 570,706
2,780,000 - 2,780,000 - - - -
7,345,000 - 7,345,000 - - - - 9,215,000 - 1,065,000 8,150,000 1,090,000 188,649 787,226
5,630,000 - 540,000 5,090,000 555,000 165,250 687,575
5,680,000 - 570,000 5,110,000 520,000 120,750 632,025
1,830,000 - - 1,830,000 895,000 41,475 55,500
5,710,000 - - 5,710,000 1,340,000 151,200 350,700 - 5,235,000 - 5,235,000 525,000 146,913 851,464
44,420,000 7,375,000 12,650,000 39,145,000 5,300,000 1,045,523 5,477,419
117,110,970$ 19,905,000$ 25,926,375$ 111,089,595$ 10,535,000$ 3,351,693$ 24,521,232$
2015
107
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SCHEDULE OF BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
December 31, 2015
Total
District District District District District Tax Increment
No. 1202 No. 1203 No. 1207 No. 1208 No. 1211 Financing Districts
Assets
Cash and Investments 292,780$ 5,767,975$ 351,713$ 1,564,647$ 47,574$ 8,024,689$
Accrued interest 931 16,122 919 2,471 - 20,443
Accounts receivable - - - - 44,308 44,308
Due from other districts - 4,450,000 - - - 4,450,000
Due from other governments - - - 3,411 - 3,411 Total assets 293,711$ 10,234,097$ 352,632$ 1,570,529$ 91,882$ 12,542,851$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 45,468$ 23,227$ 263$ 49$ -$ 69,007$
Salaries payable - 1,420 - 232 232 1,884
Due to other districts - - - 4,350,000 100,000 4,450,000
Total liabilities 45,468 24,647 263 4,350,281 100,232 4,520,891
Fund balance:
Restricted 248,243 10,209,450 352,369 (2,779,752) (8,350) 8,021,960
Total liabilities and
fund balance 293,711$ 10,234,097$ 352,632$ 1,570,529$ 91,882$ 12,542,851$
108
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2015
Total
District District District District District Tax Increment
No. 1202 No. 1203 No. 1207 No. 1208 No. 1211 Financing Districts
Revenues:
Tax increment collections -$ -$ -$ 1,792,896$ -$ 1,792,896$
Charges for services - - - - 44,308 44,308
Investment income 1,732 16,500 2,103 7,229 - 27,564
Total revenues 1,732 16,500 2,103 1,800,125 44,308 1,864,768
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 154,632 236,567 12,346 20,965 2,206 426,716
Capital outlay:
General government - 676,502 1,537 - - 678,039
Public works - 668,051 - - - 668,051
Total expenditures 154,632 1,581,120 13,883 20,965 2,206 1,772,806
Revenues over
(under) expenditures (152,900) (1,564,620) (11,780) 1,779,160 42,102 91,962
Other financing sources (uses):
Interfund loan interest - 190,000 - (190,000) - -
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance (152,900) (1,374,620) (11,780) 1,589,160 42,102 91,962
Fund balance - January 1 401,143 11,584,070 364,149 (4,368,912) (50,452) 7,929,998
Fund balance - December 31 248,243$ 10,209,450$ 352,369$ (2,779,752)$ (8,350)$ 8,021,960$
109
This page left blank intentionally.
110
Contents
Financial Trends
Revenue Capacity
Debt Capacity
Demographic and Economic Information
Operating Information
STATISTICAL SECTION
This part of the City's comprehensive annual financial report presents
detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in
the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary
information says about the City's overall financial health.
Page
112
Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the
comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year.
These schedules contain trend information to help the
reader understand how the City's financial performance
and well-being have changed over time.
These schedules contain information to help the reader
assess the City's most significant local revenue source,
the property tax.
These schedules contain information to help the reader
assess the affordability of the City's current levels of
outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional
debt in the future.
These schedules offer demographic and economic
indicators to help the reader understand the
environment within which the City's financial activities
take place.
These schedules contain service and infrastructure data
to help the reader understand how the information in the
City's financial report relates to the services the City
provides and the activities it performs.
120
124
129
131
111
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NET POSITION BY COMPONENT
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(accrual basis of accounting)
2006 2007 2008 2009
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets 69,814,012$ 67,680,882$ 71,601,227$ 69,622,370$
Restricted - - 3,362,446 7,132,865
Unrestricted 15,280,058 25,136,312 29,577,462 30,705,600
Total governmental
activities net position 85,094,070$ 92,817,194$ 104,541,135$ 107,460,835$
Business-type activities
Net investment in capital assets 46,981,755$ 43,046,160$ 46,851,736$ 47,333,794$
Restricted - - 954,486 624,837
Unrestricted 6,379,515 13,649,355 12,071,776 15,158,720
Total business-type
activities net position 53,361,270$ 56,695,515$ 59,877,998$ 63,117,351$
Primary government
Net investment in capital assets 116,795,767$ 110,727,042$ 118,452,963$ 116,956,164$
Restricted - - 4,316,932 7,757,702
Unrestricted 21,659,573 38,785,667 41,649,238 45,864,320
Total primary government
net position 138,455,340$ 149,512,709$ 164,419,133$ 170,578,186$
a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of
this change in accounting principle.
b The City implemented GASB 68 in fiscal year 2015. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of
this change in accounting principle.
Fiscal Year
112
2010 2011 2012 2013a 2014 2015b
69,783,162$ 75,045,018$ 78,644,392$ 83,842,970$ 85,708,114$ 85,838,618$
9,952,443 22,915,776 23,215,910 20,289,579 18,268,724 16,925,171
41,709,528 29,544,149 29,587,700 33,242,317 31,316,605 21,957,830
121,445,133$ 127,504,943$ 131,448,002$ 137,374,866$ 135,293,443$ 124,721,619$
48,807,806$ 56,877,100$ 63,766,144$ 66,126,387$ 75,803,672$ 83,395,794$
618,852 623,099 876,909 611,377 619,295 793,664
17,041,122 12,926,674 14,390,609 16,867,459 21,176,026 16,405,405
66,467,780$ 70,426,873$ 79,033,662$ 83,605,223$ 97,598,993$ 100,594,863$
118,590,968$ 131,922,118$ 142,410,536$ 149,969,357$ 161,511,786$ 169,234,412$
10,571,295 23,538,875 24,092,819 20,900,956 18,888,019 17,718,835
58,750,650 42,470,823 43,978,309 50,109,776 52,492,631 38,363,235
187,912,913$ 197,931,816$ 210,481,664$ 220,980,089$ 232,892,436$ 225,316,482$
Fiscal Year
113
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN NET POSITION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(accrual basis of accounting)
2006 2007 2008 2009
Expenses
Governmental activities:
General government 5,414,961$ 7,039,298$ 6,836,248$ 7,362,560$
Public safety 13,300,351 13,743,194 14,833,647 14,751,479
Public works 8,973,031 8,757,022 9,046,873 8,993,290 Parks 5,341,682 5,025,560 5,971,565 7,732,777 Interest on long-term debt 2,973,749 1,887,633 1,923,821 2,129,490
Total governmental activities expenses 36,003,774 36,452,707 38,612,154 40,969,596
Business-type activities:
Utilities 9,234,651 10,036,844 10,625,811 11,833,994
Liquor 9,968,963 10,361,998 11,049,223 11,449,194
Aquatic center 795,614 780,981 787,663 798,369 Golf course 3,652,169 3,621,977 3,612,482 3,588,831 Arena 1,542,098 1,538,407 1,689,660 1,665,082 Community activity centers 2,506,551 2,630,127 2,813,189 2,971,293
Total business-type activities expenses 27,700,046 28,970,334 30,578,028 32,306,763
Total primary government expenses 63,703,820$ 65,423,041$ 69,190,182$ 73,276,359$
Program RevenuesGovernmental activities:
Charges for services:
General government 731,613$ 784,659$ 840,070$ 811,087$
Public safety 6,146,114 5,632,642 5,839,683 5,081,563
Other activities 793,796 736,329 763,130 804,500 Operating grants and contributions 1,423,302 1,384,024 1,170,183 1,377,785 Capital grants and contributions 4,013,617 4,299,509 7,710,015 2,582,999
Total governmental activities program revenues 13,108,442 12,837,163 16,323,081 10,657,934
Business-type activities:
Charges for services:
Utilities 11,421,474 13,125,773 13,713,249 14,858,488
Liquor 11,029,445 11,436,175 12,122,599 12,655,777 Aquatic center 867,626 868,833 925,388 859,816 Golf course 3,646,620 3,630,538 3,680,584 3,660,466
Arena 1,418,555 1,414,173 1,399,599 1,414,410
Community activity centers 1,918,598 2,102,938 2,117,619 2,192,274
Operating grants and contributions 122,358 127,492 147,456 135,917
Total business-type activities program revenues 30,424,676 32,705,922 34,106,494 35,777,148
Total primary government program revenues 43,533,118$ 45,543,085$ 50,429,575$ 46,435,082$
Net (Expense)/Revenue
Governmental activities (22,895,332)$ (23,615,544)$ (22,289,073)$ (30,311,662)$
Business-type activities 2,724,630 3,735,588 3,528,466 3,470,385
Total primary government net expense (20,170,702)$ (19,879,956)$ (18,760,607)$ (26,841,277)$
General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position
Governmental activities:Property taxes 20,414,298$ 21,459,001$ 22,242,276$ 23,834,274$ Tax increment collections 7,228,002 7,793,577 8,578,434 7,587,386
Franchise taxes 499,206 570,871 647,466 667,791
Lodging taxes - - - -
Unrestricted investment earnings 1,230,264 1,581,702 1,185,899 387,177
Gain on disposal of capital assets 8,418 58,377 1,265 11,709 Insurance recovery - - - - Transfers 838,230 919,625 967,800 743,025
Total governmental activities 30,218,418 32,383,153 33,623,140 33,231,362
Business-type activities:
Property taxes -$ -$ -$ 300,372$
Unrestricted investment earnings 283,771 510,678 607,312 209,371
Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets 25,210 7,604 14,505 2,250 Transfers (838,230) (919,625) (967,800) (743,025)
Total business-type activities (529,249) (401,343) (345,983) (231,032)
Total primary government 29,689,169$ 31,981,810$ 33,277,157$ 33,000,330$
Change in Net Position
Governmental activities 7,323,086$ 8,767,609$ 11,334,067$ 2,919,700$ Business-type activities 2,195,381 3,334,245 3,182,483 3,239,353
Total primary government 9,518,467$ 12,101,854$ 14,516,550$ 6,159,053$
a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle.
b The City completed a major departmental reorganization in 2014, moving parks maintenance activities from parks to public works. Prior year
information has not been modified as a result of this change.
c The City implemented GASB 68 in fiscal year 2015. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle.
Fiscal Year
114
2010 2011 2012 2013a 2014b 2015c
6,961,082$ 7,013,231$ 12,598,979$ 8,256,261$ 8,522,319$ 8,518,236$
15,543,594 16,024,575 16,598,423 17,117,693 18,145,498 19,507,770
8,558,363 9,193,336 9,437,285 11,502,250 15,553,852 15,284,777 5,608,758 5,540,585 5,904,724 6,132,709 3,330,781 3,385,367 2,528,424 2,339,370 2,222,392 2,024,749 1,989,863 2,180,678
39,200,221 40,111,097 46,761,803 45,033,662 47,542,313 48,876,828
11,848,538 12,130,685 12,610,875 13,748,186 14,207,197 14,963,304
11,594,643 11,727,106 11,740,744 12,261,413 12,393,218 11,818,602
769,608 718,027 866,944 822,932 827,485 872,960 3,561,573 3,390,949 3,293,192 3,199,815 3,342,544 3,409,343 1,527,536 1,689,001 2,182,200 2,272,510 2,375,173 2,642,097 2,965,243 2,998,915 2,842,139 2,967,115 2,975,782 3,436,325
32,267,141 32,654,683 33,536,094 35,271,971 36,121,399 37,142,631
71,467,362$ 72,765,780$ 80,297,897$ 80,305,633$ 83,663,712$ 86,019,459$
946,107$ 969,745$ 1,142,984$ 1,259,908$ 1,529,555$ 1,322,430$
5,448,505 5,988,485 6,549,929 7,410,755 8,102,352 8,683,465
723,559 775,676 913,864 846,999 960,261 1,158,207 1,162,411 1,392,892 1,685,026 2,283,007 1,578,538 3,122,178 13,325,431 5,770,912 9,137,011 6,372,735 8,244,695 10,044,077
21,606,013 14,897,710 19,428,814 18,173,404 20,415,401 24,330,357
15,036,016 15,873,937 17,729,589 17,831,225 17,550,802 19,335,443
12,857,064 13,172,484 13,230,941 13,711,557 13,515,168 12,462,387 945,529 913,383 1,001,946 928,055 918,412 971,936 3,443,204 3,285,741 3,225,591 2,711,743 3,229,348 2,857,190
1,301,506 1,315,435 1,452,435 1,942,971 2,092,567 2,316,853
2,194,476 2,331,136 2,399,090 2,625,633 2,583,257 3,119,789
373,230 135,428 1,042,195 516,242 428,416 595,141
36,151,025 37,027,544 40,081,787 40,267,426 40,317,970 41,658,739
57,757,038$ 51,925,254$ 59,510,601$ 58,440,830$ 60,733,371$ 65,989,096$
(17,594,208)$ (25,213,387)$ (27,332,989)$ (26,860,258)$ (27,126,912)$ (24,546,471)$
3,883,884 4,372,861 6,545,693 4,995,455 4,196,571 4,516,108
(13,710,324)$ (20,840,526)$ (20,787,296)$ (21,864,803)$ (22,930,341)$ (20,030,363)$
25,122,113$ 25,040,871$ 25,884,662$ 26,894,161$ 27,062,224$ 29,632,072$ 4,488,073 4,083,345 3,536,935 3,981,938 5,052,705 1,792,896
692,288 722,160 815,530 1,891,967 2,055,396 2,089,038
- - - - 11,301 22,716
474,444 601,250 341,986 (96,390) 440,051 195,620
35,594 131,365 - 16,654 29,037 41,900 - - - 816,654 - - 765,994 694,206 696,935 133,907 (9,605,225) (2,230,966)
31,578,506 31,273,197 31,276,048 33,638,891 25,045,489 31,543,276
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
205,965 280,438 113,177 (77,848) 191,974 91,907
26,574 - 2,644,854 17,587 - 39,427 (765,994) (694,206) (696,935) (133,907) 9,605,225 2,230,966
(533,455) (413,768) 2,061,096 (194,168) 9,797,199 2,362,300
31,045,051$ 30,859,429$ 33,337,144$ 33,444,723$ 34,842,688$ 33,905,576$
13,984,298$ 6,059,810$ 3,943,059$ 6,778,633$ (2,081,423)$ 6,996,805$ 3,350,429 3,959,093 8,606,789 4,801,287 13,993,770 6,878,408
17,334,727$ 10,018,903$ 12,549,848$ 11,579,920$ 11,912,347$ 13,875,213$
Fiscal Year
115
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
2006 2007 2008 2009a
General fund
Reserved 36,849$ 28,637$ 13,982$ 18,241$
Unreserved 13,797,189 14,078,220 14,365,021 12,031,358
Nonspendable - - - -
Restricted - - - -
Assigned - - - -
Unassigned - - - -
Total general fund 13,834,038$ 14,106,857$ 14,379,003$ 12,049,599$
All other governmental funds
Reserved 2,682,238$ 6,247,539$ 8,467,918$ 15,223,353$
Unreserved, reported in:
Special revenue funds 13,179,904 14,750,448 14,950,538 12,813,439
Capital projects funds 3,160,085 5,853,322 4,270,440 6,683,668
Restricted, reported in:
Special revenue funds - - - -
Debt service funds - - - -
Construction funds - - - -
Assigned, reported in:
Capital projects funds - - - -
Total all other governmental funds 19,022,227$ 26,851,309$ 27,688,896$ 34,720,460$
a The substantial decrease in general fund unreserved fund balance in 2009 is due to the transfer
of the equipment replacement program to the construction fund.
The substantial increase in other governmental funds reserved fund balance in 2009 is due to
unspent bond proceeds related to the new Public Works Facility, which is under construction.
b The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental
Fund Type Definitions" in 2011. The City did not apply the statement retroactively.c The substantial increase in other governmental funds restricted fund balance in 2014 is due to
unspent bond proceeds related to the current refunding that took place on February 1, 2015.
Fiscal Year
116
2010 2011b 2012 2013 2014c 2015
10,258$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
12,868,952 - - - - -
- 10,871 413,200 13,322 240,291 529,513
- 178,295 880,395 185,395 757,673 417,673
- 1,539,286 1,643,077 1,559,461 1,566,329 1,547,398
- 11,744,764 11,902,462 12,573,457 11,429,444 11,825,799
12,879,210$ 13,473,216$ 14,839,134$ 14,331,635$ 13,993,737$ 14,320,383$
9,460,834$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
15,333,460 - - - - -
12,150,968 - - - - -
- 17,178,857 13,185,962 13,040,516 9,719,309 9,405,757
- 8,068,183 9,704,408 6,246,769 12,678,291 7,134,575
- 2,087,548 2,759,463 3,318,947 6,598,832 551,132
- 8,098,935 7,159,890 8,354,268 7,046,610 13,127,881
36,945,262$ 35,433,523$ 32,809,723$ 30,960,500$ 36,043,042$ 30,219,345$
Fiscal Year
117
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
2006 2007a 2008 2009
Revenues
General property taxes 20,414,298$ 21,459,001$ 22,242,276$ 23,834,274$
Tax increment collections 7,228,002 7,793,577 8,578,434 7,587,386
Special assessments 1,751,219 1,750,444 2,442,490 2,703,833
Franchise taxes 499,206 570,871 647,466 667,791
Lodging fees - - - -
License and permits 3,488,897 2,909,521 2,915,455 2,104,967
Intergovernmental 2,773,350 3,699,006 3,005,883 1,507,170
Charges for services 2,691,354 2,748,709 3,093,941 2,905,410
Fines and forfeitures 1,023,935 971,486 1,073,174 1,224,983
Investment income 1,230,264 1,581,702 1,185,899 387,177
Rental of property 310,145 355,734 255,607 343,616
Parkland dedication - - - -
Other revenues 246,797 225,839 126,723 160,035
Total revenues 41,657,467 44,065,890 45,567,348 43,426,642
Expenditures
General government 5,995,804 6,544,307 6,235,352 6,895,329
Public safety 12,431,114 12,985,215 13,788,797 13,692,686
Public works 5,233,907 5,787,619 6,189,594 5,911,758
Parks 3,300,375 3,455,789 3,693,595 3,688,063
Capital outlay 8,980,526 11,991,122 14,666,907 22,997,065
Debt service
Principal 5,985,000 6,190,000 7,090,000 7,415,000
Interest and other charges 2,107,036 1,677,770 1,967,021 1,841,342
Total expenditures 44,033,762 48,631,822 53,631,266 62,441,243
Revenues over (under) expenditures (2,376,295) (4,565,932) (8,063,918) (19,014,601)
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in 6,865,258 7,290,391 7,983,585 11,347,773
Transfers out (6,027,028) (6,370,766) (7,015,785) (10,604,748)
Sale of capital assets 54,457 66,845 96,825 34,592
Insurance recovery - - - -
Bonds issued - 11,735,000 7,755,000 22,950,000
Premium on bonds issued - - - 64,765
Discount on bonds issued - (53,637) (35,848) (75,621)
Refunding bonds issued - - - -
Payment to refunding escrow - - - -
Principal paid by escrow (9,035,000) - - -
Total other financing sources (uses) (8,142,313) 12,667,833 8,783,777 23,716,761
Net change in fund balances (10,518,608)$ 8,101,901$ 719,859$ 4,702,160$
Debt service as a percentage of
noncapital expenditures 23.1% 21.5% 22.6% 21.7%
a The substantial change in debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures in 2007 is due
to a change in the way this ratio is calculated. The City did not recalculate previously reported ratios.
Fiscal Year
118
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
25,122,113$ 24,972,166$ 25,838,422$ 26,891,756$ 26,988,493$ 29,535,270$
4,488,073 4,083,345 3,536,935 3,981,938 5,052,705 1,792,896
6,746,186 4,502,112 4,975,641 4,884,510 4,606,010 4,132,128
692,288 722,160 815,530 1,891,967 2,055,396 2,089,038
- - - - 11,301 22,716
2,410,314 2,724,763 3,155,351 4,150,512 4,583,183 4,907,364
3,726,849 3,059,964 2,032,966 2,509,166 3,961,509 6,093,966
3,014,894 3,181,961 3,708,482 3,667,612 4,270,720 4,414,991
1,203,767 1,243,426 1,195,054 1,109,710 1,163,907 1,195,271
474,444 601,250 341,986 (96,390) 440,051 195,314
426,517 539,091 506,276 518,862 546,874 416,522
- - 702,100 - 757,278 800,000
413,400 156,231 240,841 278,607 78,775 361,425
48,718,845 45,786,469 47,049,584 49,788,250 54,516,202 55,956,901
6,523,398 5,739,481 6,624,573 7,351,556 7,625,826 6,337,944
14,177,387 14,668,772 14,985,068 15,859,622 16,647,821 17,537,528
5,898,023 6,000,539 6,277,506 7,018,614 10,201,335 10,578,472
3,524,950 3,633,922 3,852,260 3,915,568 1,341,884 1,416,858
13,505,827 14,235,496 13,622,443 10,690,207 19,883,144 19,912,565
2,975,000 4,480,000 6,620,000 14,531,375 4,096,375 13,276,375
2,584,006 2,278,068 2,292,394 2,270,259 1,923,647 2,375,613
49,188,591 51,036,278 54,274,244 61,637,201 61,720,032 71,435,355
(469,746) (5,249,809) (7,224,660) (11,848,951) (7,203,830) (15,478,454)
2,903,762 5,615,669 4,495,940 3,472,964 1,404,975 3,232,770
(2,137,768) (4,921,463) (3,799,005) (3,339,057) (11,010,200) (6,472,066)
134,329 209,773 94,975 61,642 70,603 78,509
- - - 816,654 - 167,167
2,535,000 3,320,000 2,748,720 2,555,000 16,155,000 9,040,000
898,658 108,097 436,148 275,360 327,987 492,838
- - - (60,334) (179,891) (47,815)
8,285,000 - 1,990,000 5,710,000 5,180,000 3,490,000
(9,094,822) - - - - -
- - - - - -
3,524,159 4,332,076 5,966,778 9,492,229 11,948,474 9,981,403
3,054,413$ (917,733)$ (1,257,882)$ (2,356,722)$ 4,744,644$ (5,497,051)$
15.4% 17.8% 19.4% 32.2% 13.7% 28.9%
Fiscal Year
119
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
ASSESSED VALUE, ACTUAL VALUE AND TAX CAPACITY OF TAXABLE PROPERTY
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
City Tax CityUsedAdjusted Capacity Referendum
Estimated Limited Taxable Total for Rate Net Rate Rate
8,713,166$ 8,541,954$ 8,536,086$ 101,948$ 86,860$ 89,272$ 22.613% 0.00703% 2.317$
9,619,356 9,456,650 9,451,668 113,429 96,170 98,765 21.150% 0.00641% 2.172
9,986,738 9,933,166 9,928,907 120,084 100,954 103,850 21.197% 0.00601% 2.204
10,112,498 10,091,005 10,079,499 122,532 101,831 105,130 22.447% 0.00597% 2.334
9,960,341 9,960,341 9,949,807 120,817 104,914 108,452 22.972% 0.00606% 2.501
9,441,688 9,441,688 9,431,941 113,981 98,897 102,319 24.660% 0.00654% 2.672
9,179,305 9,179,305 9,025,565 109,013 94,811 97,879 26.247% 0.00667% 2.799
8,955,431 8,955,431 8,798,601 106,530 93,504 96,120 27.216% 0.00690% 2.921
9,065,550 9,065,550 8,911,695 108,069 93,607 96,156 27.920% 0.00695% 2.961
9,837,972 9,837,972 9,701,677 117,907 106,662 109,203 26.605% 0.00631% 2.953
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown.
The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification.
b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of
assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity
based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity
(see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate"). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only.
Estimated
Rate b
Market Value (In Thousands) a Tax Capacity (In Thousands)
2012
Fiscal Direct
2010
2011
2006
2007
2008
2009
2015
Year
2013
2014
120
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX CAPACITY RATES
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Total
Basic Debt Total Tax Direct &
Rate Rate Capacity RMV Hennepin Tax Cap. RMV Other Overlap
20.755% 1.858% 22.613% 0.007% 41.016% 19.226% 0.154% 8.104% 90.959%
19.636% 1.514% 21.150% 0.006% 39.110% 18.244% 0.147% 8.417% 86.921%
19.563% 1.634% 21.197% 0.006% 38.571% 16.951% 0.177% 8.546% 85.265%
20.204% 2.243% 22.447% 0.006% 40.413% 17.766% 0.183% 8.413% 89.039%
20.004% 2.968% 22.972% 0.006% 42.640% 18.746% 0.194% 9.431% 93.789%
21.548% 3.112% 24.660% 0.007% 45.840% 21.786% 0.196% 10.489% 102.775%
23.131% 3.116% 26.247% 0.007% 48.231% 27.565% 0.215% 10.911% 112.954%
23.762% 3.454% 27.216% 0.007% 49.461% 27.762% 0.217% 11.483% 115.922%
24.458% 3.462% 27.920% 0.007% 49.959% 27.556% 0.223% 12.051% 117.486%
22.477% 4.128% 26.605% 0.006% 46.398% 27.344% 0.215% 11.100% 111.447%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
RMV: Referendum Market Value
Geographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different
school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit,
Hennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City,
Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates.
2015
2010
2011
2006
2007
2008
2009
2012
2013
2014
City Rates Overlapping Rates
ISD #273 EdinaFiscal
Year
121
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAX PAYERS
CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO
Percentage Percentage
of Total of Total
Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Tax Capacity Rank Capacity
Southdale Shopping Center 2,520,750$ 1 2.14% 3,497,098$ 1 3.43%
Galleria Shopping Center 1,977,317 2 1.68% 1,525,906 2 1.50%
Southdale Medical Building 904,365 3 0.77% 361,116 8 0.35%
Centennial Lakes Retail 831,684 4 0.71% - 0.00%
Centennial Lakes Phase V 813,134 5 0.69% 581,944 4 0.57%
Centennial Lakes Phase IV 797,386 6 0.68% 570,650 5 0.56%
Southdale Office Park 775,872 7 0.66% 738,790 3 0.72%
The District 520,998 8 0.44% - 0.00%
7700 France 520,046 9 0.44% 461,750 7 0.45%
Centennial Lakes Phase III 508,896 10 0.43% 356,748 9 0.35%
May Department Stores - 0.00% 513,070 6 0.50%
Centennial Lakes Phase II - 0.00% 344,800 10 0.34%
Totals 10,170,448$ 8.63% 8,951,872$ 8.78%
Source: City of Edina Assessing Office
20062015
Taxpayer
122
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Total Collections in
Tax Percentage Subsequent Percentage
Levy Amount of Levy Years Amount of Levy
20,820,130$ 20,310,889$ 97.55% 66,489$ 20,377,378$ 97.87%
21,530,528 21,347,789 a 99.15%a 65,836 21,413,625 99.46%
22,605,669 22,178,719 b 98.11%b 174,769 22,353,488 98.88%
24,153,933 23,484,137 c 97.23%c 69,437 23,553,574 97.51%
25,492,973 24,904,346 97.69% (310,913) 24,593,433 96.47%
25,786,217 25,067,625 97.21% (209,354) 24,858,271 96.40%
26,248,226 25,983,685 98.99% (148,530) 25,835,155 98.43%
26,747,384 26,545,984 99.25% (178,983) 26,367,001 98.58%
27,454,872 27,326,092 99.53% (28,622) 27,297,470 99.43%
29,700,010 29,497,362 99.32% - 29,497,362 99.32%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
a In 2007 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for MVHC after five years of not making payments.
b In 2008 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for only 50% of MVHC.
c In 2009 the State of Minnesota once again quit reimbursing the City for MVHC.
2015
Collected within the
Fiscal Year of the Levy
2009
2006
2007
2008
2013
2012
2014
Total Collections to Date
Taxes
Payable
2010
2011
123
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands, except per capita)
General Public Tax Permanent EEEP Rec. Utility Total Percentage
Obligation Project Increment Improvement Revenue Facility Revenue Primary of Personal Per
Debt Revenue Bonds Revolving Bonds Bonds Bonds Government Income Capita
a
5,687$ 15,913$ 20,402$ 1,453$ -$ 4,577$ 3,534$ 51,566$ 2.18% 1,100$
10,963 15,235 15,628 7,152 - 3,675 11,133 63,786 2.39% 1,355 10,393 14,531 10,000 14,719 - 2,835 23,779 76,257 2.99% 1,583
24,057 22,442 4,115 14,574 - 4,479 21,713 91,380 3.54% 1,897
32,595 13,282 3,314 16,254 - 4,059 19,507 89,011 3.39% 1,857
30,417 13,077 2,477 18,353 - 3,569 28,800 96,693 3.66% 2,004
28,318 11,787 550 22,067 74 5,952 33,160 101,908 3.71% 2,087
32,035 5,627 - 18,889 62 6,540 29,635 92,788 2.91% 1,885
30,806 21,445 - 21,554 51 6,249 39,633 119,738 3.97% 2,382 27,225 21,300 - 24,776 40 8,055 32,575 113,971 3.66% 2,268
Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements.All figures are presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments if applicable.
a Population data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council found on page 129.
Business-Type Activities
Year
Fiscal
2015
2006
2007
2008
2009
2012
2013
20102011
2014
Governmental Activities
124
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands, except per capita)
Less: Amounts Available Percentage of
General Obligation Debt a in Debt Service Fund b Total Property Value
c Per Capita
5,687$ 2,194$ 3,493$ 0.04% 121$
10,963 2,891 8,072 0.08% 233
10,393 3,669 6,724 0.07% 216
24,057 5,454 18,603 0.18% 499
32,595 6,105 26,490 0.27% 680
30,417 8,068 22,349 0.24% 630
28,318 9,704 18,614 0.20% 580
32,035 6,247 25,788 0.29% 651
30,806 12,678 18,128 0.20% 613
27,225 7,135 20,090 0.20% 542
Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements.
a Presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments.
b This is the amount restricted for debt service principal payments.
c See statistical schedule titled "Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property" for
estimated property value data.
Year
Fiscal
2010
2015
2013
2012
2011
200620072008
2009
2014
125
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2015
Net General Percentage
Obligation Bonded Applicable City Share
Debt Outstanding in City a of Debt
Overlapping Debt:
Hennepin County 689,516,184$ 8.30% 57,229,843$
Hennepin Suburban Park District 49,596,497 11.32% 5,614,323
Hennepin Regional Rail Authority 34,389,498 11.32% 3,892,891
School Districts:
ISD No. 273 (Edina) 174,826,586 98.35% 171,941,947
ISD No. 270 (Hopkins) 165,308,887 7.50% 12,398,167
ISD No. 271 (Bloomington) 13,964,814 0.02% 2,793
ISD No. 272 (Eden Prairie) 57,992,207 0.93% 539,328
ISD No. 280 (Richfield) 14,304,017 31.20% 4,462,853
ISD No. 283 (St. Louis Park) 39,266,728 0.02% 7,853
Metro Council 67,164,480 3.86% 2,592,549
Total Overlapping Debt 1,306,329,898 258,682,547
City of Edina 73,340,777 100.00% 73,340,777
Total Overlapping and Direct Debt 1,379,670,675$ 332,023,324$
Ratio of debt per capita (50,261 population) 6,606$
Ratio of debt to estimated market valuation of $9,837,972,300 3.37%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services
a The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using tax capacity. Applicable percentages
were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's tax capacity that is within
the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total tax capacity.
Direct Debt:
Debt Ratios:
126
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands)
2006 2007 2008a 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Debt limit 191,974$ 199,775$ 302,385$ 301,369$ 298,494$ 282,958$ 270,767$ 263,958$ 267,351$ 291,050$
Total net debt
applicable
to limit 21,750 26,380 25,095 46,670 45,170 42,860 39,545 37,030 51,760 48,000
Legal debt
margin 170,224$ 173,395$ 277,290$ 254,699$ 253,324$ 240,098$ 231,222$ 226,928$ 215,591$ 243,050$
Total net debt
applicable to
the limit as a
percentage of
debt limit 11.33% 13.20% 8.30% 15.49% 15.13% 15.15% 14.60% 14.03% 19.36% 16.49%
Market value (after fiscal disparities)
Debt limit (3% of market value)
Debt applicable to limit:
General obligation bonds
Public project revenue bonds
Total debt applicable to limit
Legal debt margin
a The State of Minnesota changed the legal debt limit from 2% of taxable market value to 3% during 2008.
291,050,307
21,290,000
243,050,307$
Fiscal Year
9,701,676,898$
26,710,000
48,000,000
Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2015
127
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Less: operating Net available
Revenue expenses revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage
Public Project Revenue Bonds (Annual Appropriation Lease Revenue)
2006 1,501,741$ -$ 1,501,741$ 480,000$ 779,778$ 1,259,778$ 1.19
2007 1,497,500 - 1,497,500 690,000 725,855 1,415,855 1.06
2008 1,425,186 - 1,425,186 715,000 696,118 1,411,118 1.01
2009 1,424,405 - 1,424,405 745,000 665,193 1,410,193 1.01
2010 1,421,354 - 1,421,354 9,280,000 901,535 10,181,535 0.14
2011 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 210,000 574,681 784,681 1.72
2012 1,362,444 - 1,362,444 1,295,000 548,691 1,843,691 0.74
2013 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 6,225,000 589,734 6,814,734 0.20
2014 1,356,844 - 1,356,844 235,000 223,754 458,754 2.96
2015 2,521,840 - 2,521,840 3,760,000 729,879 4,489,879 0.56
Tax Increment Bonds
2006 7,228,002 - 7,228,002 8,445,000 902,607 9,347,607 0.77
2007 7,793,577 - 7,793,577 4,795,000 625,606 5,420,606 1.44
2008 8,578,434 - 8,578,434 5,650,000 445,694 6,095,694 1.41
2009 7,587,386 - 7,587,386 5,890,000 244,236 6,134,236 1.24
2010 4,488,073 - 4,488,073 805,000 125,820 930,820 4.82
2011 4,083,345 - 4,083,345 840,000 94,359 934,359 4.37
2012 3,536,935 - 3,536,935 1,930,000 48,445 1,978,445 1.79
2013 3,981,939 - 3,981,939 550,000 9,350 559,350 7.12
2014 5,052,705 - 5,052,705 - - - -
2015 1,792,896 - 1,792,896 - - - -
Permanent Improvement Revolving Bonds (Special Assessment)
2006 85,656 - 85,656 - 43,366 43,366 1.98
2007 391,921 - 391,921 160,000 46,694 206,694 1.90
2008 564,534 - 564,534 155,000 306,759 461,759 1.22
2009 1,508,662 - 1,508,662 150,000 513,708 663,708 2.27
2010 1,339,350 - 1,339,350 655,000 520,278 1,175,278 1.14
2011 2,466,395 - 2,466,395 1,330,000 524,964 1,854,964 1.33
2012 2,520,862 - 2,520,862 1,375,000 557,514 1,932,514 1.30
2013 2,837,227 - 2,837,227 5,745,000 567,551 6,312,551 0.45
2014 2,870,102 - 2,870,102 1,555,000 548,927 2,103,927 1.36
2015 3,732,374 - 3,732,374 6,015,000 503,029 6,518,029 0.57
Utility Bond
2006 11,416,361 9,107,143 2,309,218 665,000 129,608 794,608 2.91
2007 13,125,419 9,735,839 3,389,580 690,000 108,840 798,840 4.24
2008 13,544,728 10,076,422 3,468,306 1,485,000 459,983 1,944,983 1.78
2009 14,857,798 10,815,216 4,042,582 2,045,000 803,157 2,848,157 1.42
2010 15,034,881 11,119,053 3,915,828 2,185,000 768,160 2,953,160 1.33
2011 15,871,102 11,438,288 4,432,814 2,270,000 693,285 2,963,285 1.50
2012 17,723,103 11,811,468 5,911,635 2,360,000 811,990 3,171,990 1.86
2013 17,830,425 12,893,159 4,937,266 3,400,000 933,970 4,333,970 1.14
2014 17,548,883 13,443,940 4,104,943 3,670,000 884,075 4,554,075 0.90
2015 19,334,023 14,387,132 4,946,891 12,300,000 882,427 13,182,427 0.38
Recreational Facility Bonds
2006 5,929,984 5,808,902 121,082 880,000 199,260 1,079,260 0.11
2007 5,870,485 5,798,005 72,480 905,000 168,159 1,073,159 0.07
2008 6,005,571 5,972,558 33,013 845,000 135,956 980,956 0.03
2009 5,932,900 5,977,793 (44,893) 860,000 92,128 952,128 (0.05)
2010 5,690,239 5,822,861 (132,622) 415,000 100,926 515,926 (0.26)
2011 5,510,043 5,760,947 (250,904) 485,000 115,050 600,050 (0.42)
2012 5,679,972 6,240,222 (560,250) 520,000 105,000 625,000 (0.90)
2013 5,582,769 6,118,195 (535,426) 550,000 138,127 688,127 (0.78)
2014 6,239,445 6,358,030 (118,585) 290,000 176,197 466,197 (0.25)
2015 6,137,111 6,258,138 (121,027) 350,000 176,808 526,808 (0.23)
Debt service requirementsFiscal
Year
128
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Estimated
Personal Per Capita High School
Income Personal Graduation Unemployment
Population (In thousands) Income Rate Rate
46,896 2,365,434$ 50,440$ 92.0% 3.00%
47,090 2,673,959 56,784 92.0% 3.45%
48,169 2,547,369 52,884 92.0% 4.33%
48,169 2,582,436 53,612 92.4% 6.38%
47,941 2,622,564 54,704 91.6% 5.56%
48,262 2,640,124 54,704 92.2% 5.25%
48,829 2,749,854 56,316 97.4% 4.56%
49,216 3,193,922 64,896 97.7% 3.98%
50,261 3,018,676 60,060 97.8% 3.10%
50,261 3,115,378 61,984 97.9% 2.82%
Sources:
Population data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council. 2014 is the most recent.
Personal income and per capita income estimates based on MN Department of Employment
and Economic Development Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. 2014 is the most recent.
High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County.
Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.
2015
2012
2013
Fiscal
Year
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2014
129
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS
CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO
Percentage of Percentage of
Total City Total City
Employees Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment
Fairview Southdale Hospital 2,613 1 10.84% 2,500 2 11.32%
Edina Public Schools ISD #273 1,860 2 7.71% 1,172 4 5.31%
City of Edina 757 3 3.14% 262 7 1.19%
BI Worldwide 600 4 2.49% DNA DNA DNA
Regis Corporation 600 5 2.49% DNA DNA DNA
Barr Engineering 453 6 1.88% DNA DNA DNA
Lund Food Holdings, Inc 405 7 1.68% DNA DNA DNA
International Dairy Queen Inc. 400 8 1.66% 300 6 1.36%
Edina Realty 400 9 1.66% 210 9 0.95%
FilmTec Corporation 375 10 1.56% DNA DNA DNA
Macy's (Marshall Field's or Dayton's) - 0.00% 1,200 3 5.43%
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. - 0.00% 4,500 1 20.38%
Con Agra Foods - 0.00% 196 10 0.89%
JC Penny Co. - 0.00% 250 8 1.13%
Nash Finch Co. - 0.00% 350 5 1.59%
Totals 8,463 35.10% 10,940 49.54%
Sources:
2015 data from ReferenceUSA, written and telephone survey (October 2014) done by Ehlers,
and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.
2006 data from previous CAFR.
DNA: Historical data is not available
20062015
Employer
130
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 b 2013 b 2014 b 2015
Administration
General Fund 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 6.85 5.85 4.85 4.85
HRA Fund - - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00
Liquor Fund 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Communications and Technology Services
General Fund 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.50 4.65 5.15 6.15 6.15
Central Services 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Community Development
General Fund 10.75 10.75 10.75 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 12.00 12.00
Engineering
General Fund 7.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 10.50 12.00 12.00 13.00
Finance
General Fund 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 6.00 6.00
Utilities Fund 1.75 1.75 1.75 2.75 2.75 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Liquor Fund 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 - -
Fire Protection
General Fund 38.50 40.50 40.50 40.50 40.50 39.50 39.75 42.75 42.85 43.85
Utilities Fund 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
Human Resources
General Fund - - - - - - 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Parks & Recreation
General Fund 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 8.00 7.00 7.00
Aquatic Center 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55
Golf Course 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Arena 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Art Center 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Edinborough Park 6.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.80 5.80 5.80
Centennial Lakes 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Police Protection
General Fund 72.75 73.75 73.75 74.65 73.65 71.15 71.65 70.65 72.50 70.50
Utilities Fund 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Public Works
General Fund 48.40 48.40 48.40 47.40 47.40 47.20 48.20 46.40 43.35 43.35
Construction Fund 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Utilities Fund 13.25 13.25 13.25 15.25 15.25 14.45 13.95 13.75 15.20 15.20
Central Services 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 11.00 11.00
Other - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - - -
Total 270.00 278.00 278.00 281.00 280.00 274.00 278.00 281.00 285.00 285.00
Source: City of Edina 2016-2017 Budget
a Full-time employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. In a typical
year the City will employ an additional 600-700 people in these categories.
b The City completed a major departmental reorganization that is reflected on this chart between years 2012-2014.
In some cases, data for years before the reorganization has been modified from what was originally reported to
improve comparisons.
Budgeted Full-time Employees for Fiscal Year a
Function
131
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
General Government
Total City employees 887 890 918 885 869 892 989 1,040 1,093 1,077
Votes cast a 26,270 7,930 31,512 2,733 25,463 7,957 31,841 3,480 24,049 9,370
Public Works
Asphalt placed (tons) 9,000 8,000 7,500 9,500 7,643 8,500 9,000 9,273 8,383 8,888
Concrete (cu. yds.) 650 850 480 640 503 558 667 560 396 670
Public Safety
Crimes reported 1,937 2,010 2,025 1,985 1,890 1,590 1,628 1,594 1,571 N/A
Fire calls 963 1,012 913 852 910 960 858 893 926 1,251
Medical calls 3,470 3,510 3,516 3,496 3,599 3,652 3,946 3,803 3,982 3,818
Central Services
Vehicle fixes 2,398 2,460 2,967 2,539 2,431 2,331 2,546 3,493 3,277 2,923
Utilities
Daily consumption b 7,209 7,372 7,376 7,596 6,790 6,909 7,613 6,652 6,489 6,308
Aquatic Center
Attendance 120,406 114,173 110,000 64,836 86,654 77,696 139,909 91,340 92,200 128,523
Golf Course
Total rounds played 114,737 112,821 112,663 117,819 101,314 95,771 96,496 79,529 85,231 66,483
Source: Various City departments
N/A Data not available
a The City Elections department runs general elections in even-numbered years and school district elections in odd-numbered years.
Number of votes cast tend to vary between even and odd-numbered years and based on presidential election cycles.
b Daily average of water pumped from city wells, measured in thousands of gallons.
Fiscal Year
Function
132
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Public Works
Miles of streets 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224
City parking ramps 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Public Safety
Fire stations 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parks & Recreation
City parks 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Acreage of parks 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553
Park buildings 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27
Utilities
Wells 18 18 19 19 19 18 18 18 18 18
Watermain miles 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199
Sanitary sewer miles 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186
Sewer connections 14,851 14,851 14,851 13,933 13,933 13,933 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979
Arena
Ice sheets 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4
Source: Various City departments
Fiscal Year
Function
133
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov
952-826-0366
Management Report
for
City of Edina, Minnesota
December 31, 2015
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Edina, Minnesota’s (the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The purpose of this report is to
provide comments resulting from our audit process and to communicate information relevant to city
finances in Minnesota. We have organized this report into the following sections:
Audit Summary
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
Government-Wide Financial Statements
Legislative Updates
Accounting and Auditing Updates We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other
concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and assistance extended to us during the course of our audit.
The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the City, management, and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process comments resulting
from our audit process and information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. Accordingly, this report is
not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 6, 2016
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-1-
AUDIT SUMMARY
The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider
important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged with governance of the City.
OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements. Professional standards require that we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related
to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate the following
information related to our audit.
PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT
We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit.
AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS
Based on our audit of the City’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015:
We have issued an unmodified opinion on the City’s basic financial statements. Our report
included a paragraph emphasizing that the City implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions—
an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27, and GASB Statement No. 71, Pension Transition for
Contributions Made Subsequent to the Measurement Date—an amendment of GASB Statement
No. 68, during the year ended December 31, 2015. Our opinion was not modified with respect to
this matter.
We reported no deficiencies involving the City’s internal control over financial reporting that we
consider to be material weaknesses.
The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance required to be reported under
Government Auditing Standards.
We reported no findings based on our testing of the City’s compliance with Minnesota laws and
regulations.
-2-
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant
accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements.
The City implemented GASB Statement Nos. 68 and 71 during the year ended December 31, 2015. These statements provide new guidance on accounting and financial reporting for pensions accounted for in the financial statements of plan employers. Implementation of these standards resulted in an adjustment to the
beginning equity reported in the City’s government-wide and enterprise fund financial statements, as described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. The application of remaining policies was
not changed during the year ended December 31, 2015.
We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative
guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the
proper period.
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are
based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about
future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were:
Depreciation – Management’s estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
Compensated Absences – Management’s estimate is based on current rates of pay and sick leave balances.
Net Other Post-Employment Benefit (OPEB) Liabilities – Actuarial estimates of the net OPEB
obligation is based on eligible participants, estimated future health insurance premiums, and
estimated retirement dates.
Pension Benefits – Actuarial estimates of net pension liabilities (assets) are calculated using actuarial calculations that include significant assumptions, including projected changes,
investment returns, retirement ages, proportionate share, and employee turnover.
We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management to develop these accounting estimates
in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear.
CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the
audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Where applicable, management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the
misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management, when applicable,
were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit’s financial statements taken as a whole.
-3-
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT
For purposes of this report, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor’s report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated June 6, 2016. MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the City’s financial statements or a determination of the type of
auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City’s auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention.
OTHER MATTERS We applied certain limited procedures to Management’s Discussion and Analysis, the budgetary comparison information, the Schedule of Funding Progress for the Other Post-Employment Benefits
Plans, and the pension-related required supplementary information (RSI), which are RSI that supplements the basic financial statements. Our procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI. We were engaged to report on the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules accompanying the financial statements, which are not RSI. With respect to this supplementary information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of
preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements. We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves.
We were not engaged to report on the introductory section, the supplementary financial information, and the statistical section which accompany the financial statements but are not RSI. We did not audit or perform other procedures on this other information and we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.
-4-
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City’s
governmental funds, which include the General, special revenue, debt service, and capital project funds. These funds are used to account for the basic services the City provides to all of its citizens, which are
financed primarily with property taxes. The governmental fund information in the City’s financial statements focuses on budgetary compliance, and the sufficiency of each governmental fund’s current assets to finance its current liabilities.
PROPERTY TAXES
Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities. For the 2014 fiscal year, local ad valorem property tax levies provided 39.0 percent of the total
governmental fund revenues for cities over 2,500 in population, and 35.5 percent for cities under 2,500 in
population. Property tax levies certified by Minnesota cities for 2015 increased about 4.0 percent over 2014, compared to an increase of 1.6 percent the prior year. A one-year levy limit imposed on cities over
2,500 in population for the 2014 levy year was lifted for the 2015 levy year.
The total market value of property in Minnesota cities increased about 8.5 percent for the 2015 levy year,
following a modest increase of 1.1 percent for levy year 2014 and a four-year trend of declining market
values for levy years 2010 through 2013. Market values showed increases across all property categories for 2015, with gains in the market values of residential homestead properties (10.0 percent) and
non-homestead residential properties (9.7 percent) outpacing the market value gain of
commercial/industrial properties (2.2 percent). Because the assessed valuation used for levying property taxes is based on values from the previous fiscal year (e.g., the market value for taxes payable in 2015 is
based on estimated values as of January 1, 2014), market value improvement has lagged behind recent upturns in the housing market and the economy in general.
The City’s taxable market value increased 1.3 percent for taxes payable in 2014 and increased 8.9 percent for taxes payable in 2015. The following graph shows the City’s changes in taxable market value over the
past 10 years:
$–
$1,500,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$4,500,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$7,500,000,000
$9,000,000,000
$10,500,000,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Taxable Market Value
-5-
Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state’s property classification system to each property’s market value. Each property classification, such as
commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates. Consequently, a city’s total
tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the proportion of the City’s tax base that is in each property classification from year-to-year, as well as
legislative changes to tax rates. The City’s tax capacity increased 1.4 percent and 9.1 percent for taxes payable in 2014 and 2015, respectively.
The following graph shows the City’s change in tax capacities over the past 10 years:
$–
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000
$70,000,000
$80,000,000
$90,000,000
$100,000,000
$110,000,000
$120,000,000
$130,000,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Local Tax Capacity
The improvement in property tax capacities contributed to decreases to the overall state-wide and metro area tax rates for 2015. The following table presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for
each of the last two levy years, along with comparative state-wide and metro area rates:
Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity
2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015
Average tax rate
City 48.8 46.9 46.0 43.4 27.9 26.6
County 47.6 44.7 46.6 42.9 50.0 46.4
School 28.9 27.1 30.9 28.3 28.4 27.4
Special taxing 7.3 6.9 9.5 8.8 12.2 11.3
Total 132.6 125.6 133.0 123.4 118.4 111.7
City of EdinaMetro Area
Seven-CountyAll Cities
State-Wide
The City’s portion of the tax capacity rates for its residents has historically been well below the state-wide and metro area averages.
-6-
GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES
The following table summarizes the changes in the fund balances of the City’s governmental funds during
the year ended December 31, 2015, presented both by fund balance classification and by fund:
Increase
2015 2014 (Decrease)
Fund balances of governmental funds
Total by classification
Nonspendable 529,513$ 240,291$ 289,222$
Restricted 17,509,137 29,754,105 (12,244,968)
Assigned 14,675,279 8,612,939 6,062,340
Unassigned 11,825,799 11,429,444 396,355
Total – governmental funds 44,539,728$ 50,036,779$ (5,497,051)$
Total by fund
General 14,320,383$ 13,993,737$ 326,646$
Housing and Redevelopment Authority 8,021,960 7,929,998 91,962
Debt Service 7,134,575 12,678,291 (5,543,716)
Construction 13,350,342 12,826,516 523,826
Nonmajor funds 1,712,468 2,608,237 (895,769)
Total – governmental funds 44,539,728$ 50,036,779$ (5,497,051)$
as of December 31,
Governmental Funds Change in Fund Balance
Fund Balance
In total, the fund balances of the City’s governmental funds decreased by $5,497,051 during the year ended December 31, 2015. The significant decrease in the Debt Service Fund is due to significant debt
payments on refunding bonds that were refunded in 2015.
-7-
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
The following table presents the per capita revenue of the City’s governmental funds for the past three
years, along with state-wide averages.
We have included the most recent comparative state-wide averages available from the Office of the State Auditor to provide a benchmark for interpreting the City’s data. The amounts received from the typical major sources of governmental fund revenue will naturally vary between cities based on factors such as
the City’s stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it provides, and other attributes. It will also differ from year-to-year due to the effect of inflation and
changes in the City’s operation. Also, certain data on these tables may be classified differently than how
they appear on the City’s financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state-wide information, particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures.
We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify unique or unusual trends and activities of your city. We intend for this type of comparative and trend
information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the Management’s Discussion and
Analysis. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population count, which for most years is based on estimates.
Year December 31, 2013 December 31, 2014 2013 2014 2015
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 49,216 50,261 50,261
Property taxes 422$ 427$ 546$ 537$ 588$
Tax increments 40 46 81 101 36
Franchise taxes 33 37 38 41 42
Special assessments 72 64 99 92 82
Licenses and permits 38 41 84 91 98
Intergovernmental revenues 148 166 51 79 121
Charges for services 91 90 75 85 88
Other 30 65 37 59 59
Total revenue 874$ 936$ 1,011$ 1,085$ 1,114$
Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
City of EdinaState-Wide
The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the
average Minnesota city, while having a lower tax rate, as shown on the table above. Property tax revenue increased by $51 per capita, due to an increased property tax levy. Tax increment revenue decreased by
$65 per capita, due to decertification of Grandview and Centennial Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Districts. Intergovernmental revenues increased by $42 per capita due to increased state maintenance aid received due to eligible expenses and pass-through grant money received for livable communities.
-8-
The expenditures of governmental funds will also vary from state-wide averages and from year-to-year, based on the City’s circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows:
Current – These are typically the general operating type expenditures occurring on an annual
basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues.
Capital Outlay and Construction – These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more
typically fluctuating significantly from year-to-year. Many of these expenditures are project-oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the
expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects.
Debt Service – Although the expenditures for debt service may be relatively consistent over the
term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt
may be repaid with general property taxes.
The City’s expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with
state-wide averages, are presented in the following table:
Year December 31, 2013 December 31, 2014 2013 2014 2015
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 49,216 50,261 50,261
Current
83$ 87$ 149$ 152$ 126$
239 254 322 331 349
91 114 143 203 210
85 92 80 27 28
91 98 – – –
589$ 645$ 694$ 713$ 713$
Capital outlay
and construction 219$ 276$ 217$ 396$ 396$
Debt service
102$ 115$ 295$ 82$ 264$
39 34 46 38 47
141$ 149$ 341$ 120$ 311$
General government
City of EdinaState-Wide
Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
Interest and fiscal charges
Public safety
Streets and highways
Parks and recreation
All other
Principal
The City’s governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state-wide averages for
cities in the same population class. The City’s current operating costs are higher than average for public safety service costs, which is partially caused by the City having a full-time fire department. Debt service
expenditures for 2015 were $191 per capita more than the prior year due to debt refunding payments
made during fiscal 2015.
-9-
GENERAL FUND
The City’s General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the
community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal operation, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and parks and
recreation. The graph below illustrates the change in the General Fund financial position over the last five years. We have also included a line representing annual expenditures to reflect the change in the size of the General Fund operation over the same period.
$–
$4,000,000
$8,000,000
$12,000,000
$16,000,000
$20,000,000
$24,000,000
$28,000,000
$32,000,000
$36,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
General Fund Financial PositionYear Ended December 31,
Fund Balance Cash Balance (Net of Interfund Borrowing)Expenditures
The City’s General Fund cash and investments balance (net of interfund borrowing) at December 31,
2015 was $15,206,793. Total fund balance at December 31, 2015 was $14,320,383, which is an increase of $326,646 from the prior year, as compared to a budgeted decline in fund balance of $2,613,394.
As the graph illustrates, the City has generally been able to maintain healthy cash and fund balance levels as the volume of financial activity has grown. This is an important factor because a government, like any
organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. A healthy financial position allows the City
to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and is a factor in determining
the City’s bond rating and resulting interest costs. A trend that is typical to Minnesota local governments, especially the General Fund of cities, is the
unusual cash flow experienced throughout the year. The City’s General Fund cash disbursements are made fairly evenly during the year other than the impact of seasonal services such as snowplowing, street maintenance, and park activities. Cash receipts of the General Fund are quite a different story. Taxes
comprise about 65 percent of the fund’s total annual revenue. Approximately half of these revenues are received by the City in July and the rest in December. Consequently, the City needs to have adequate cash
reserves to finance its everyday operations between these payments.
The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned
fund balance for the General Fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned General Fund balance of
42 percent to 47 percent of the subsequent year’s budgeted tax revenue. As of December 31, 2015, the City has $11,825,799 of unassigned fund balance in the General Fund, or 47.3 percent, of 2016 budgeted
tax revenue. This amount is $64,542 above the goal range identified in the policy.
-10-
The following chart reflects the City’s General Fund revenue sources for 2015 compared to budget:
Other
Charges for Services
Intergovernmental
Licenses and Permits
Taxes
General Fund Revenue
Budget Actual General Fund revenue for 2015 was $36,607,894, which was $2,552,762 (7.5 percent) greater than
budget. Licenses and permits revenue was over budget by $997,554 due to a continued increase in the number of projects during the year and an increase in the number of permits sold. Other revenue was over
budget by $836,390 primarily related to parkland dedication revenue that was not anticipated in the 2015
budget.
The following graph presents the City’s General Fund revenues by source for the last five years. The
graph reflects the City’s reliance on property taxes and other local sources of revenue, and shows the virtual elimination of general state aid revenue in recent years.
$– $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000 $16,000,000 $18,000,000 $20,000,000 $22,000,000 $24,000,000
General Fund Revenue by Source
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total General Fund revenue for 2015 was $1,251,477 (3.5 percent) higher than last year. Property taxes
increased $675,306 from the increased levy and collections. Licenses and permits increased $336,641. These increases were for reasons previously discussed. Intergovernmental revenues increased $280,410
over the prior year. This is due to increased state maintenance aid received in the current year.
-11-
The following graphs illustrate the components of General Fund spending for 2015 compared to budget:
Parks
Public Works
Public Safety
General Government
General Fund Expenditures
Budget and Actual
Budget Actual Total General Fund expenditures for 2015 were $34,432,954, which was $387,278 (1.1 percent) under
budget. Public works expenditures were under budget by $213,231 due to turnover in the engineering department. General government expenditures were under budget by $100,879.
The following graph presents the City’s General Fund expenditures by function for the last five years:
$–
$1,500,000 $3,000,000
$4,500,000 $6,000,000
$7,500,000 $9,000,000 $10,500,000 $12,000,000 $13,500,000 $15,000,000 $16,500,000
$18,000,000
General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks
General Fund Expenditures by Function
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total General Fund expenditures for 2015 were $993,607 (3.0 percent) higher than the previous year.
Public safety expenditures increased $852,019. This was mainly due to increased personnel expenditures
for salary increases, retiree pay, and new positions.
During 2014, the City changed the allocation of expenditures between public works and parks, which can
be seen in the graph above.
-12-
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
The City maintains a number of enterprise funds to account for services the City provides that are
financed primarily through fees charged to those utilizing the service. This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City’s enterprise funds, which include
the Utilities, Liquor, Aquatic Center, Golf Course, Arena, Art Center, Edinborough Park, Centennial Lakes, and Sports Dome Funds.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION The following table summarizes the changes in the financial position of the City’s enterprise funds during
the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, presented both by classification and by fund:
Increase
2015 2014 (Decrease)
Net position of enterprise funds
Total by classification
Net investment in capital assets 83,395,794$ 75,803,672$ 7,592,122$
Restricted for debt service 793,664 619,295 174,369
Unrestricted 16,405,405 21,176,026 (4,770,621)
Total – enterprise funds 100,594,863$ 97,598,993$ 2,995,870$
Total by fund
Utilities 73,117,410$ 69,577,192$ 3,540,218$
Liquor 2,120,111 3,188,891 (1,068,780)
Aquatic Center 3,025,654 2,918,674 106,980
Golf Course 5,000,977 6,600,674 (1,599,697)
Arena 5,232,983 4,643,129 589,854
Nonmajor funds 12,097,728 10,670,433 1,427,295
Total – enterprise funds 100,594,863$ 97,598,993$ 2,995,870$
Enterprise Funds Change in Financial Position
Net Position
as of December 31,
In total, the net position of the City’s enterprise funds increased by $2,995,870 during the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase is mainly due to positive operating results in the Utilities Fund. The
Arena Fund and Sports Dome Fund had increases to net position from transfers in to reimburse the funds
for debt proceeds initially received by governmental funds.
These increases were offset by a decline in net position to record a change in accounting principle for the
implementation of GASB Statement No. 68 on pensions totaling $3,882,538.
-13-
UTILITIES FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Utilities Fund:
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Utilities Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense
Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense
The Utilities Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $73,117,410, an increase of $3,540,218 from the prior year. Of this, $59,284,208 represents the investment in utility distribution system capital assets, leaving $13,833,202 of unrestricted net position. The Utilities Fund reported a change in accounting
principle related to pensions that reduced unrestricted net position by $937,164 during 2015.
Utilities Fund operating revenue was $19,334,023 for 2015, an increase of $1,785,140, or 10.2 percent,
mostly due to increased rates and additional water and sewer connection fees. Operating expenses, including interest expense, were $15,234,135, or 6.2 percent, more than last year, mainly due to increased
depreciation expense and increased charges from Metropolitan Council Environmental Services during
the year.
-14-
LIQUOR FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Liquor Fund:
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Liquor Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Sales
Cost of Sales
Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
The Liquor Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $2,120,111, a decrease of $1,068,780 from the prior
year. Of the net position balance, $1,618,124 represents the investment in liquor capital assets, leaving
$501,987 of unrestricted net position. The Liquor Fund reported a change in accounting principle related to pensions that reduced unrestricted net position by $937,164 during 2015.
Liquor sales for 2015 were $12,462,387, a decrease of $1,052,781 (7.8 percent) from the previous year. The decrease in Liquor Fund sales during the current year is due to increased competition in the
marketplace. The Liquor Fund generated a gross profit of $3,046,938 in 2015, or 24.4 percent, of gross
sales. This compares to an average gross profit of 26.9 percent experienced over the previous five years. This decline is again the result of increased competition in the marketplace. Operating expenses for 2015
were $2,403,153, which is $47,231, or 1.9 percent, lower than last year, mainly for commodities.
-15-
AQUATIC CENTER FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Aquatic Center Fund:
$–
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
$900,000
$1,000,000
$1,100,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Aquatic Center FundYear Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense
Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense
The Aquatic Center Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $3,025,654, an increase of $106,980 from the prior year. Of the net position balance, $1,690,574 represents investments in Aquatic Center capital assets
and $793,664 restricted for debt service, leaving $541,416 of unrestricted net position. Aquatic Center Fund operating revenues for 2015 were $971,936, which is $53,524 (5.8 percent) higher
than last year. Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2015, were $873,500, an increase of $45,475 (5.5 percent) from the prior year. As the graph above illustrates, operating income was positive in
each of the five years presented.
-16-
GOLF COURSE FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Golf Course Fund:
$(600,000) $(300,000)$–
$300,000 $600,000
$900,000 $1,200,000 $1,500,000 $1,800,000 $2,100,000
$2,400,000 $2,700,000
$3,000,000 $3,300,000 $3,600,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Golf Course FundYear Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense
Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense
The Golf Course Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $5,000,977, a decrease of $1,599,697 from the prior year. Of this, $5,174,404 represents the investment in golf course land and capital assets, leaving a
deficit ($173,427) of unrestricted net position.
The Golf Course Fund reported a change in accounting principle related to pensions that reduced
unrestricted net position by $535,523 during 2015.
Golf Course Fund operating revenues for 2015 were $2,857,190, which is $372,158 (11.5 percent) less
than the previous year, mainly due to the closing of the Fred Richards Golf Course during the current
year. Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2015, were $2,943,614, down $399,762 from the prior year for similar reasons.
Due to the cash flow losses over recent years, management has developed a plan to support the operations of this fund by making transfers from other funds. The transfer from the Liquor Fund made during 2015
totaled $285,000. The Braemar Memorial Fund also transferred $156,871 into this fund in 2015 to finance capital purchases.
The Golf Course Fund experienced a decline in net position of $1,008,330 in 2015 related to the transfer of Fred Richards Golf Course land to be used for parkland purposes. This fund also had a loss on the sale
of capital assets of $467,097, mainly from the closure of the Fred Richards Golf Course.
-17-
ARENA FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Arena Fund:
$(800,000)
$(400,000)
$–
$400,000
$800,000
$1,200,000
$1,600,000
$2,000,000
$2,400,000
$2,800,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Arena Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense
Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense
The Arena Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $5,232,983, an increase of $589,854 from the prior year. Of this, $5,585,990 represents the investment in arena capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($353,007)
of unrestricted net position. The Arena Fund reported a change in accounting principle related to pensions that reduced unrestricted net position by $401,642 during 2015.
Arena Fund operating revenues for 2015 were $2,307,985, $216,300 more than last year. This increase mostly relates to additional building rental in 2015. Operating expenses, including interest expense, for
2015 were $2,642,081, an increase of $266,924 from the prior year, mainly in personal services and
depreciation. As the graph above illustrates, the operating loss increased from the previous year, with an increase in the loss of $50,624.
As the graph above illustrates, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from other funds on an annual basis.
These transfers totaled $1,245,070 in fiscal 2015 from the Construction Fund and Liquor Fund.
The Construction Fund also made a transfer of $919,496 to the Arena Fund in fiscal 2015 to reimburse
the fund for debt proceeds initially received in the Construction Fund for capital projects at the facility.
-18-
ART CENTER FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Art Center Fund:
$(200,000)
$(100,000)
$–
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Art Center Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
The Art Center Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $93,134, a decrease of $311,298 from the prior year. Of this, $114,400 represents the investment in capital assets, leaving a deficit ($21,266) of
unrestricted net position. The Art Center Fund reported a change in accounting principle related to
pensions that reduced unrestricted net position by $267,761 during 2015.
Art Center Fund operating revenues for 2015 were $516,429, $35,547 more than the prior year. Operating
expenses for 2015 were $673,583, which increased $19,273 from the prior year.
As the graph above illustrates, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has
been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from the Liquor Fund on an annual basis. These transfers totaled $100,000 in fiscal 2015.
-19-
EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND AND CENTENNIAL LAKES FUND
The Edinborough Park Fund and Centennial Lakes Fund were recorded as two separate enterprise funds
by the City starting in fiscal 2012, after previously being reported as a combined fund.
Edinborough Park Fund
The following graph presents four years of operating results for the Edinborough Park Fund:
$(200,000)
$–
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
2012 2013 2014 2015
Edinborough Park Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
The Edinborough Park Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $2,453,796, a decrease of $316,003 from
the prior year. Of this, $1,100,854 represents the net investment in capital assets, leaving $1,352,942 of unrestricted net position. The Edinborough Park Fund reported a change in accounting principle related to
pensions that reduced unrestricted net position by $401,642 during 2015.
Edinborough Park Fund operating revenues for 2015 were $1,336,873, which was $11,265, or
0.9 percent, more than fiscal year 2014. Operating expenses also increased $54,130, or 4.0 percent, from
fiscal year 2014.
-20-
Centennial Lakes Fund
The following graph presents four years of operating results for the Centennial Lakes Fund:
$(250,000)
$–
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
2012 2013 2014 2015
Centennial Lakes Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
The Centennial Lakes Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $658,374, a decrease of $421,442 from the prior year. Of this, $291,045 represents the net investment in capital assets, leaving $367,329 of
unrestricted net position. The Centennial Lakes Fund reported a change in accounting principle related to
pensions that reduced unrestricted net position by $267,761 during 2015.
Centennial Lakes Fund operating revenues for 2015 were $801,023, which was $42,130, or 5.6 percent,
higher than the prior year. Operating expenses increased $5,511, or 0.6 percent.
SPORTS DOME FUND
The Sports Dome Fund was established by the City starting in fiscal 2014 and began limited operations in
late 2014. Of the $8,892,424 total fund balance at year-end, $8,536,195 represents the investment in
capital assets, leaving $356,229 of unrestricted net position. The Sports Dome Fund reported a change in accounting principle related to pensions that reduced unrestricted net position by $133,881 during 2015.
The Sports Dome Fund had operating revenues for 2015 of $465,464 and operating expenses of $396,592, which were higher than the prior year, due to fiscal 2015 being the first full year of activity.
During 2015, the City made a transfer from the Construction Fund in the amount of $2,291,047 to the
Sports Dome Fund to reimburse the fund for debt proceeds initially received in the Construction Fund for
capital projects at the facility.
-21-
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In addition to fund-based information, the current reporting model for governmental entities also requires
the inclusion of two government-wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City
as a single, unified entity. These government-wide financial statements provide information on the total cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long-term liabilities.
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
The Statement of Net Position essentially tells you what your city owns and owes at a given point in time, the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net position represents the resources the City has leftover to
use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable
form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, net position is divided into three components: net investment in capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted.
The following table presents the components of the City’s net position as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, for governmental activities and business-type activities:
Increase
2015 2014 (Decrease)
Net position
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets 85,838,618$ 85,708,114$ 130,504$
Restricted 16,925,171 23,974,199 (7,049,028)
Unrestricted 21,957,830 25,611,130 (3,653,300)
Total governmental activities 124,721,619 135,293,443 (10,571,824)
Business-type activities
Net investment in capital assets 83,395,794 75,803,672 7,592,122
Restricted 793,664 619,295 174,369
Unrestricted 16,405,405 21,176,026 (4,770,621)
Total business-type activities 100,594,863 97,598,993 2,995,870
Total net position 225,316,482$ 232,892,436$ (7,575,954)$
As of December 31,
The City’s total net position at December 31, 2015 was $7.6 million lower than the previous year-end. Of
the decrease, $10.6 million came from governmental activities offset by an increase of $3.0 million from business-type activities. Net investment in capital assets increased in both the governmental activities and
business-type activities due to significant capital projects occurring in the fiscal year. The decrease in
restricted net position in the governmental activities relates to the use of restricted assets from refunding bonds in 2015. The decrease in the unrestricted net position in the governmental activities relates to
significant transfers out of governmental funds to enterprise funds in 2015. A portion of the decrease in unrestricted net position in the governmental activities and in the business-type activities relates to a change in accounting principle in the current year as a result of the GASB Statement No. 68
implementation.
-22-
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
The Statement of Activities tracks the City’s yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other
transactions that increase or reduce total net position. These amounts represent the full cost of providing
services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund-based financial statements. This statement includes the
cost of supplies used, depreciation of long-lived capital assets, and other accrual-based expenses.
The following table presents the change in net position of the City for the years ended December 31, 2015
and 2014:
2014
Program
Expenses Revenues Net Change Net Change
Net (expense) revenue
Governmental activities
General government 8,518,236$ 2,914,744$ (5,603,492)$ (6,768,580)$
Public safety 19,507,770 10,068,299 (9,439,471) (8,911,518)
Public works 15,284,777 9,859,837 (5,424,940) (7,391,078)
Parks and recreation 3,385,367 1,487,477 (1,897,890) (2,065,873)
Interest on long-term debt 2,180,678 – (2,180,678) (1,989,863)
Business-type activities
Utilities 14,963,304 19,545,616 4,582,312 3,677,095
Liquor 11,818,602 12,468,708 650,106 1,124,950
Aquatic Center 872,960 971,936 98,976 90,927
Golf course 3,409,343 2,905,321 (504,022) (95,346)
Arena 2,642,097 2,373,023 (269,074) (282,606)
Community activity centers 3,436,325 3,394,135 (42,190) (318,449)
Total net (expense) revenue 86,019,459$ 65,989,096$ (20,030,363) (22,930,341)
General revenues
Property taxes and tax increments 31,424,968 32,114,929
Franchise and lodging taxes 2,111,754 2,066,697
Unrestricted investment earnings 287,527 632,025
Gain on disposal of capital assets 81,327 29,037
Total general revenues 33,905,576 34,842,688
13,875,213 11,912,347
Net position – beginning, as previously reported 232,892,436 220,980,089
Change in accounting principle (21,451,167) –
Net position – beginning, as restated 211,441,269 220,980,089
Net position – ending 225,316,482$ 232,892,436$
2015
Change in net position
One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the
way the City’s governmental and business-type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the dependence of the City’s governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and
unrestricted grants. It also shows if the City’s business-type activities are generating sufficient program
revenues (service charges and program-specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the current downward pressures on the general revenue sources.
-23-
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES
Despite the 2015 legislative session beginning with a projected budget excess of $1.87 billion for the
2016–2017 biennium, the most favorable budget forecast in over a decade, little was accomplished during
the regular legislative session due to partisan disagreement. The regular session adjourned without the Legislature bringing forth a number of significant funding bills, including the Omnibus Legacy Bill
(funding for outdoor heritage, clean water, parks and trails, arts, and cultural heritage) and a bonding bill for capital projects. The Governor subsequently vetoed a number of other funding bills, including the
Omnibus E–12 Education Bill due to the Legislature not addressing his demand for a universal preschool
provision. Eventually, a one-day special session produced funding bills for E–12 education, jobs and energy, Legacy programs, environment and agriculture, and capital investment.
The following is a summary of recent legislation affecting Minnesota cities in 2015 and into the future:
Local Government Aid (LGA) – The Legislature completely overhauled the LGA formula for fiscal
year 2014 and thereafter, creating a three-tiered formula that includes separate “need factor” calculations for cities with populations under 2,500, between 2,500 and 10,000, or over 10,000. The
new formula simplified the LGA calculation, and reduced the volatility of the LGA distribution by
limiting the amount it may decline in a given year. Beginning in 2015, any reduction to a city’s calculated LGA distribution will be limited to the lesser of $10 per capita, or 5 percent of their
previous year net tax levy. For cities that gain under the new formula, the increases will be distributed proportionate to their unmet need, as determined by the new “need factor” calculations. The state-wide LGA appropriation was $516.9 million for fiscal 2015, and is $519.4 million for fiscal
2016 and thereafter. Sales Tax Exemption – Cities (both home-rule and statutory) were exempted from paying sales tax
on qualifying purchases, effective for purchases made on or after January 1, 2014. Purchases of goods or services by an exempt local government for a publicly-provided liquor store, gas or electric utility,
golf course, marina, campground, café, laundromat, solid waste hauling or recycling operation, or
landfill will remain taxable.
The 2014 Legislature extended the definition of tax exempt local government to include all special
district; city, county, or township instrumentalities; economic development authorities; housing and redevelopment authorities; and all joint power boards or organizations. However, the effective date of
this expanded exemption list was delayed until January 1, 2017 by the 2015 Legislature.
Omnibus Bonding Bill – The Legislature approved a scaled-down Omnibus Bonding Bill during the
special session, authorizing approximately $370 million in capital improvements. Included in the
funding approved was $172.5 million for transportation infrastructure, $23.5 million for flood hazard mitigation, $10 million for Public Financing Agency (PFA) grants to municipalities for wastewater
infrastructure, and $1.5 million to the Metropolitan Council for inflow and infiltration improvement grants to metro area cities.
Legacy Funding – The Legacy bill included $9.25 million annually to finance grants for city water infrastructure improvements through the PFA. It also included $17.25 million annually to fund
“SCORE” block grants to counties for recycling and waste reduction (a portion of which is passed
through to cities) and $1 million of annual funding for a new grant program to establish or improve recycling programs in non-metro area cities.
Broadband Initiative – The Omnibus Jobs and Energy Bill passed in the special session included $10.6 million to finance the Border-to-Border Broadband Grant Program, a one-time appropriation
available until June 30, 2017.
-24-
Municipal State-Aid Streets – Included in the Omnibus Transportation Bill were annual funding
allocations for municipal state-aid streets of $107.7 million for fiscal 2016 and $178.1 million for fiscal 2017, which represents an increase of approximately $41 million over the previous biennium.
Small Cities Assistance Account – A one-time appropriation of $12.5 million was provided to create a new Small Cities Assistance Account to assist with construction and maintenance of roads located
within eligible cities, defined as a statutory or home-rule charter city that does not receive municipal state aid street financing (generally those with a population under 5,000). The aid will be distributed
to eligible cities biannually in each year funds are available based on the following formula: 5 percent
equally to all eligible cities; 35 percent allocated proportionately on each city’s share of lane miles to the total for all eligible cities; 35 percent allocated proportionately on each city’s population to the
total for all eligible cities; and 25 percent allocated proportionately on each city’s state-aid adjustment
factor to the total for all eligible cities.
Workforce Housing Grant Program – The Omnibus Jobs and Energy Bill included annual funding
of $2 million for fiscal 2016 and 2017 for a new Workforce Housing Grant Program. Eligible cities can use the grants to develop “market rate residential rental property” to serve employees of
businesses located in the eligible project areas. The maximum grant award may not exceed 25 percent
of the rental housing development project cost; and awards must be matched by a local unit of government, business, or nonprofit organization with $1 for each $2 of grant funding.
Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Policy – Law enforcement agencies that utilize ALPRs are required to establish policies governing their use that are consistent with statutory guidelines. The
Legislature placed limitations on the type of data that can be collected using ALPRs, and clarified the circumstances under which that data is considered public or private. A limitation of 60 days was established for the retention of data collected by ALPR not related to an active criminal investigation.
Standards were established for the sharing of ALPR data between law enforcement agencies.
Elections – The Elections Omnibus Bill made numerous changes to elections administration laws,
including requirements for filing fees for statutory cities, ballot formatting and marking, absentee ballots, and election recounts.
Energy Conservation Measures – The Uniform Municipal Contracting Law was amended to add water metering devices that increase efficiency to the definition of energy conservation measures,
enabling municipalities to enter into guaranteed energy savings contracts for the use of water
metering devices.
Responsible Contractor Requirement – The “responsible contractor” law enacted by the 2014
Legislature became effective on January 1, 2015. Contractors who bid on public contracts in excess of $50,000 are now required to certify that they are a “responsible bidder” in order to be awarded a
contract as the lowest responsible bidder or best value alternative. The 2015 Legislature made several clarifications and modifications to the law, including: exempting design professionals and materials suppliers from the requirements; making motor carriers subject to the requirements and establishing a
separate verification standard for them; excluding tax increment financing revenue from the value of a construction contract under the law; and allowing general contractors to submit bids without
obtaining verification from all subcontractors that bid on the project (the successful prime contractor
must submit a supplemental verification under oath prior to the execution of the contract).
Appraisal Requirements for Eminent Domain – Effective July 1, 2015, the appraisal requirements
for the acquisition of property by eminent domain are changed to require the acquiring entity to obtain at least one appraisal for the property proposed to be acquired only if the acquisition value is
greater than $25,000. For acquisitions less than $25,000, the acquiring entity may obtain a minimum
damage acquisition report in lieu of an appraisal.
-25-
Firefighter Employment Provisions and Volunteer Benefits – The Omnibus Public Safety Finance
and Policy Bill made a number of changes related to firefighters, including: allowing relief association dues as a voluntarily payroll deduction, allowing volunteer firefighters to be paid less
frequently than every 31 days, requiring the licensure of all full-time firefighters by the State Board of
Firefighter Training and Education, and expanding “continued employer health insurance benefits” to include dependents of volunteer firefighters killed in the line of duty.
Police and Firefighter Retirement Supplemental State Aid – The volunteer firefighter portion of
the Police and Firefighter Retirement Supplemental State Aid Program was made permanent. The
minimum obligation of municipalities to an associated relief association special fund is now reduced by the amount of both fire state aid and police and firefighter retirement supplemental state aid. Police
and firefighter retirement supplemental state aid is also added to the calculation of the exception to
municipal ratification requirement for lump-sum plans.
Pensions – A number of changes to the pension plans administered by the Public Employees
Retirement Association (PERA) were adopted, effective June 30, 2015, including:
The future interest rate actuarial assumption for the PERA General Plan and PERA Police and Fire Plan are changed from 8.5 percent to 8.0 percent for actuarial valuations
prepared after June 30, 2015.
The refund repayment interest rate and prior service credit purchase payment
determination rate for the PERA General Plan and PERA Police and Fire Plan are also
changed from 8.5 percent to 8.0 percent.
The CPI-based post-retirement adjustment mechanism for the PERA Police and Fire Plan
is replaced with a flat 2.5 percent increase when the plan reaches a 90 percent funding level.
The contribution stabilizer mechanisms applicable to the PERA General Plan are revised,
broadening the factors the plan’s Board of Trustees may consider before recommending an increase in the plan contribution rates.
Definitions of salary, termination of service, allowable service, retirement, and volunteer firefighter were revised for all applicable PERA plans.
Changes in eligibility, service pension levels, ancillary benefits, and service time calculations were made to the PERA Statewide Volunteer Firefighter Plan, lump sum
retirement division. A change was also made to create a “monthly benefit retirement
division” within this plan to facilitate the transfer of individual volunteer firefighter association monthly benefit plans to the statewide plan.
A number of administrative language changes were made to complete the merger of the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund into the PERA General Plan, which was
effective January 1, 2015.
-26-
ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES GASB STATEMENT NO. 72, FAIR VALUE MEASURE AND APPLICATION
The primary objective of this statement is to address accounting and financial reporting issues related to fair value measurements. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This statement provides guidance for determining a fair value measurement for financial reporting purposes. It also
provides guidance for applying fair value to certain investments and disclosures related to all fair value
measurements.
This statement generally requires investments to be measured at fair value. An investment is defined as a
security or other asset that (a) a government holds primarily for the purpose of income or profit and (b) has a present service capacity based solely on its ability to generate cash or to be sold to generate cash.
This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2015. Earlier
application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 73, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS AND RELATED
ASSETS THAT ARE NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF GASB STATEMENT 68, AND AMENDMENTS TO
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF GASB STATEMENTS 67 AND 68
The objective of this statement is to improve the usefulness of information about pensions included in financial statements of state and local governments for making decisions and assessing accountability.
This statement also clarifies the application of certain provisions of GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68 regarding 10-year schedules of required supplementary information (RSI) and other recognition issues pertaining to employers and nonemployer contributing entities. These changes will improve financial
reporting by establishing a single framework for the presentation of information about pensions, enhancing comparability for similar information reported by employers and nonemployer contributing
entities.
The requirements of this statement that address accounting and financial reporting by employers and
governmental nonemployer contributing entities for pensions not within the scope of GASB Statement
No. 68 are effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016, and the requirements of this statement that address financial reporting for assets accumulated for purposes of
providing those pensions are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2015. The requirements of
this statement for pension plans that are within the scope of GASB Statement No. 67 or for pensions that are within the scope of GASB Statement No. 68 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2015. Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 74, FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS OTHER
THAN PENSION PLANS
The objective of this statement is to improve the usefulness of information about post-employment
benefits other than pensions (other post-employment benefits [OPEB]). This statement replaces GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 57. It also includes requirements for defined contribution OPEB plans that replace
the requirements for those OPEB plans in GASB Statement Nos. 25, 43, and 50. GASB Statement No. 75,
Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions, establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for governments whose employees are provided with
OPEB, as well as for certain nonemployer governments that have a legal obligation to provide financial
support for OPEB provided to the employees of other entities.
-27-
This statement will improve financial reporting primarily through enhanced note disclosures and
schedules of RSI that will be presented by OPEB plans administered through trusts meeting the specified criteria. The new information will enhance the decision-usefulness of the financial reports of those OPEB
plans, their value for assessing accountability, and their transparency by providing information about
measures of net OPEB liabilities and explanations of how and why those liabilities changed from year-to-year. The net OPEB liability information, including ratios, will offer an up-to-date indication of
the extent to which the total OPEB liability is covered by the fiduciary net position of the OPEB plan. The comparability of the reported information for similar types of OPEB plans will be improved by the
changes related to the attribution method used to determine the total OPEB liability. The contribution
schedule will provide measures to evaluate decisions related to the assessment of contribution rates in comparison with actuarially determined rates, if such rates are determined. In addition, new information
about rates of return on OPEB plan investments will inform financial report users about the effects of
market conditions on the OPEB plan’s assets over time and provide information for users to assess the relative success of the OPEB plan’s investment strategy and the relative contribution that investment
earnings provide to the OPEB plan’s ability to pay benefits to plan members when they come due.
This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier
application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 75, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS The primary objective of this statement is to improve accounting and financial reporting by state and local
governments for post-employment benefits other than pensions (OPEB). It also improves information provided by state and local governmental employers about financial support for OPEB that is provided by other entities. This statement replaces the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 45 and 57. GASB
Statement No. 74 establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for OPEB plans.
This statement establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of
resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures. For defined benefit OPEB, this statement identifies the methods and assumptions that are required to be used to project benefit payments,
discount projected benefit payments to their actuarial present value, and attribute that present value to
periods of employee service. Note disclosure and RSI requirements about defined benefit OPEB also are addressed. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is
encouraged.
Similar to changes implemented for pensions, this statement requires the liability of employers and
nonemployer contributing entities to employees for defined benefit OPEB (net OPEB liability) to be
measured as the portion of the present value of projected benefit payments to be provided to current active and inactive employees that is attributed to those employees’ past periods of service (total OPEB
liability), less the amount of the OPEB plan’s fiduciary net position.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 77, TAX ABATEMENT DISCLOSURES
This statement requires disclosure of tax abatement information about (1) a reporting government’s own
tax abatement agreements, and (2) those that are entered into by other governments and that reduce the
reporting government’s tax revenues. Tax abatements are widely used by state and local governments, particularly to encourage economic development. For financial reporting purposes, this statement defines
a tax abatement as resulting from an agreement between a government and an individual or entity in
which the government promises to forgo tax revenues and the individual or entity promises to subsequently take a specific action that contributes to economic development or otherwise benefits the
government or its citizens.
-28-
The requirements of this statement improve financial reporting by giving users of financial statements
essential information that is not consistently or comprehensively reported to the public at present. Disclosure of information about the nature and magnitude of tax abatements will make these transactions
more transparent to financial statement users. As a result, users will be better equipped to understand
(1) how tax abatements affect a government’s future ability to raise resources and meet its financial obligations, and (2) the impact those abatements have on a government’s financial position and economic
condition. The requirements of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 78, PENSIONS PROVIDED THROUGH CERTAIN MULTIPLE-EMPLOYER DEFINED
BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
The objective of this statement is to address a practice issue regarding the scope and applicability of GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions—an amendment of GASB
Statement No. 27. This issue is associated with pensions provided through certain multiple-employer
defined benefit pension plans and to state or local governmental employers whose employees are provided with such pensions. Prior to the issuance of this statement, the requirements of GASB Statement
No. 68 applied to the financial statements of all state and local governmental employers whose employees
are provided with pensions through pension plans that are administered through trusts that meet the criteria in paragraph 4 of GASB Statement No. 68.
This statement amends the scope and applicability of GASB Statement No. 68 to exclude pensions provided to employees of state or local governmental employers through a cost-sharing,
multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan that (1) is not a state or local governmental pension plan, (2) is used to provide defined benefit pensions both to employees of state or local governmental employers and to employees of employers that are not state or local governmental employers, and (3) has
no predominant state or local governmental employer (either individually or collectively with other state or local governmental employers that provide pensions through the pension plan). This statement
establishes requirements for recognition and measurement of pension expense, expenditures, and
liabilities; note disclosures; and RSI for pensions that have the characteristics described above. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015.
Early application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 79, CERTAIN EXTERNAL INVESTMENT POOLS AND POOL PARTICIPANTS
This statement establishes criteria for an external investment pool to qualify for making the election to measure all of its investments at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes. An external investment
pool qualifies for that reporting if it meets all of the applicable criteria established in this statement. The
specific criteria address (1) how the external investment pool transacts with participants; (2) requirements for portfolio maturity, quality, diversification, and liquidity; and (3) calculation and requirements of a
shadow price. Significant noncompliance prevents the external investment pool from measuring all of its
investments at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes. If an external investment pool meets the criteria in this statement and measures all of its investments at amortized cost, the pool’s participants also
should measure their investments in that external investment pool at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes. If an external investment pool does not meet the criteria in this statement, the pool’s
participants should measure their investments in that pool at fair value.
This statement establishes additional note disclosure requirements for qualifying external investment
pools that measure all of their investments at amortized cost for financial reporting purposes and for
governments that participate in those pools. Those disclosures for both the qualifying external investment pools and their participants include information about any limitations or restrictions on participant
withdrawals. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after
June 15, 2015, except for certain provisions on portfolio quality, custodial credit risk, and shadow pricing. Those provisions are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier
application is encouraged.
-29-
GASB STATEMENT NO. 80, BLENDING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN COMPONENT UNITS—AN
AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENT NO. 14
The objective of this statement is to clarify the financial statement presentation requirements for certain
component units. This statement amends the blending requirements for the financial statement presentation of component units of all state and local governments. The additional criterion requires
blending of a component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation in which the primary government is the sole corporate member. The additional criterion does not apply to component units
included in the financial reporting entity pursuant to the provisions of GASB Statement No. 39,
Determining Whether Certain Organizations Are Component Units—an amendment of GASB Statement
No. 14. The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15,
2016. Earlier application is encouraged.
CHANGES TO REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL GRANTS
In December 2013, the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular released final guidance on administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. The final
guidance, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal
Awards (“Uniform Guidance”), supersedes and streamlines eight existing OMB Circulars into one document that includes OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-89, A-102, A-110, A-122, A-133, and the
guidance in OMB Circular A-50 on Single Audit Act follow-up. The Uniform Guidance, which is located in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
consolidates previous guidance into a streamlined format that aims to improve both its clarity and accessibility, lessen administrative burdens for federal award recipients, and reduce the risk of waste, fraud, and abuse.
The Following is a Summary of Significant Changes for Grant Recipients:
Changes time and effort documentation requirements by providing possibilities for alternative methods of accounting for salaries and wages based on achievement of performance outcomes.
Non-federal entities must have a financial management system that includes, but is not limited to:
a comparison of expenditures with budget amounts for each federal award, written procedures to implement the requirements of cash management, and written procedures for determining the
allowability of costs in accordance with Subpart E – Cost Principles.
Governments must comply with the new general procurement standards which include, but are not limited to: written standards covering conflicts of interest of employees engaged in the
selection, award, and administration of contracts and documented procurement procedures that
include an analysis of lease versus purchase alternatives when appropriate.
Governments will now be required to follow the five procurement methods which include, at
times, more restrictive compliance requirements than Minnesota Statutes. For example: small
purchases (over $3,000 prior to October 1, 2015 and over $3,500 after October 1, 2015) will require quotes.
There are new requirements for governments with subrecipients (or those making subawards), which include, but are not limited to: a required written risk assessment of each subrecipient,
which may require you to provide training and on-site reviews of their program operations.
For governments with subrecipients or those that operate as a fiscal host of a federal grant award and thus provide subawards, payments must be made in advance to the subrecipients, unless
certain requirements are not met, then the reimbursement method can be used.
-30-
Among Other Matters Specifically Applicable to Auditors, Changes to the Uniform Guidance Include:
Raising both the threshold that triggers a Single Audit and the threshold for Type A/B program determination to $750,000.
Changing the high-risk program criteria for Type A programs.
Reducing the number of high-risk Type B programs that must be tested as major programs.
Revising the Type B small program floor.
Reducing the percentage of coverage requirement to 40 percent for normal auditees and
20 percent for low-risk auditees.
Revising the criteria for low-risk auditee status.
Increasing the threshold for reporting findings to $25,000 in questioned costs and requiring more detailed information to be reported.
Effective Dates:
Year beginning January 1, 2015 –
All administrative requirements and cost principles will apply to new awards made after December 26, 2014.
Governmental entities are required to comply with the Uniform Guidance once the new
regulations are in effect at the Federal government level (December 26, 2014).
Any funding drawdowns made after January 1, 2015 must comply with the Uniform Guidance.
Must document whether the entity is in compliance with the old or new procurement standards
listed in Subpart D, Sections 200.317–200.326. The federal government has provided a two-year grace period for implementing the new procurement standards.
Year beginning January 1, 2016 –
All administrative requirements and cost principles will apply to new awards made after December 26, 2014.
Subpart F – Audit Requirements are applicable. Year beginning January 1, 2017 –
Must have implemented the new procurement standards of the Uniform Guidance, if the
government initially elected the two-year grace beginning January 1, 2015.
At this point, all of the new Uniform Guidance at Title 2 CFR 200 is applicable.
Recommended Action Items:
We recommend that award recipients familiarize themselves with the new requirements contained in the Uniform Guidance and develop a plan to become compliant with the new regulations.
Consider the following –
Attend training on the new uniform administrative requirements.
Identify needed policy and procedure changes, especially in the areas of:
o Financial management
o Payment
o Procurement
o Compensation
o Travel costs
Identify internal controls that might need to be established or modified.
Determine who within your organization is responsible for each action item.
Determine the timing of each action item.
Determine when you will implement the new procurement standards and document in writing.
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Purpose Audit Reports
Year Ended
December 31, 2015
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Page
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial
Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 1–2
Independent Auditor’s Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 3
Table of Contents
CITY OF EDINA
Year Ended December 31, 2015
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-1-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the related
notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and
have issued our report thereon dated June 6, 2016.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control
over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do
not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or
detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the City’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this
section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses
may exist that have not been identified.
(continued)
-2-
COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free from
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those
provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The
results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance
and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota June 6, 2016
-3-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
To the City Council and Management City of Edina, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of
the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, and the related
notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated June 6, 2016.
MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the Office of the State Auditor
pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and
disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the
listed categories.
In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities. However, our
audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had
we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of
that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota June 6, 2016
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF EDINA
AUDIT REPORT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
James H. Eichten, CPA
Opinion on Financial Statements
Financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
Internal Controls and Compliance
Proper internal controls over financial reporting
Compliance with laws and regulations related to financial reporting
State Laws and Regulations
Compliance with Minnesota state laws and regulations
Single Audit of Federal Awards
Not required for 2015
AUDITOR’S ROLE
Opinion on Financial Statements
Unmodified or “clean” opinion
Emphasis of a matter on implementation
of GASB #68 on pensions
Internal Controls and Compliance
No findings
State Laws and Regulations
No findings
AUDIT RESULTS
Audit Summary
Planned scope and timing of audit
Formal required communications
MANAGEMENT REPORT
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$1,500,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$4,500,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$7,500,000,000
$9,000,000,000
$10,500,000,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Taxable Market Value
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Tax Rates
Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity
2014 2015 2014 2015 2014 2015
Average tax rate
City 48.8 46.9 46.0 43.4 27.9 26.6
County 47.6 44.7 46.6 42.9 50.0 46.4
School 28.9 27.1 30.9 28.3 28.4 27.4
Special taxing 7.3 6.9 9.5 8.8 12.2 11.3
Total 132.6 125.6 133.0 123.4 118.4 111.7
City of EdinaMetro Area
Seven-CountyAll Cities
State-Wide
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Year December 31, 2013 December 31, 2014 2013 2014 2015
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 49,216 50,261 50,261
Property taxes 422$ 427$ 546$ 537$ 588$
Tax increments 40 46 81 101 36
Franchise taxes 33 37 38 41 42
Special assessments 72 64 99 92 82
Licenses and permits 38 41 84 91 98
Intergovernmental revenues 148 166 51 79 121
Charges for services 91 90 75 85 88
Other 30 65 37 59 59
Total revenue 874$ 936$ 1,011$ 1,085$ 1,114$
Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
City of EdinaState-Wide
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Year December 31, 2013 December 31, 2014 2013 2014 2015
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 49,216 50,261 50,261
Current
83$ 87$ 149$ 152$ 126$
239 254 322 331 349
91 114 143 203 210
85 92 80 27 28
91 98 – – –
589$ 645$ 694$ 713$ 713$
Capital outlay
and construction 219$ 276$ 217$ 396$ 396$
Debt service
102$ 115$ 295$ 82$ 264$
39 34 46 38 47
141$ 149$ 341$ 120$ 311$
Interest and fiscal charges
Public safety
Streets and highways
Parks and recreation
All other
Principal
General government
City of EdinaState-Wide
Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$4,000,000
$8,000,000
$12,000,000
$16,000,000
$20,000,000
$24,000,000
$28,000,000
$32,000,000
$36,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
General Fund Financial Position
Year Ended December 31,
Fund Balance Cash Balance (Net of Interfund Borrowing)Expenditures
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
$22,000,000
$24,000,000
General Fund Revenue by Source
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$1,500,000
$3,000,000
$4,500,000
$6,000,000
$7,500,000
$9,000,000
$10,500,000
$12,000,000
$13,500,000
$15,000,000
$16,500,000
$18,000,000
General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks
General Fund Expenditures by Function
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Utilities Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense
Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Liquor Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Sales
Cost of Sales
Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$(600,000)
$(300,000)
$–
$300,000
$600,000
$900,000
$1,200,000
$1,500,000
$1,800,000
$2,100,000
$2,400,000
$2,700,000
$3,000,000
$3,300,000
$3,600,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Golf Course Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Operating Revenue
Operating Expenses, Including Interest Expense
Operating Income (Loss), After Interest Expense
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
Legislative Updates
Accounting and Auditing Updates
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
GASB Statement #68
Accounting and Financial Reporting
for Pensions
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2014
Program
Expenses Revenues Net Change Net Change
Net (expense) revenue
Governmental activities
General government 8,518,236$ 2,914,744$ (5,603,492)$ (6,768,580)$
Public safety 19,507,770 10,068,299 (9,439,471) (8,911,518)
Public works 15,284,777 9,859,837 (5,424,940) (7,391,078)
Parks and recreation 3,385,367 1,487,477 (1,897,890) (2,065,873)
Interest on long-term debt 2,180,678 – (2,180,678) (1,989,863)
Business-type activities
Utilities 14,963,304 19,545,616 4,582,312 3,677,095
Liquor 11,818,602 12,468,708 650,106 1,124,950
Aquatic Center 872,960 971,936 98,976 90,927
Golf course 3,409,343 2,905,321 (504,022) (95,346)
Arena 2,642,097 2,373,023 (269,074) (282,606)
Community activity centers 3,436,325 3,394,135 (42,190) (318,449)
Total net (expense) revenue 86,019,459$ 65,989,096$ (20,030,363) (22,930,341)
General revenues
Property taxes and tax increments 31,424,968 32,114,929
Franchise and lodging taxes 2,111,754 2,066,697
Unrestricted investment earnings 287,527 632,025
Gain on disposal of capital assets 81,327 29,037
Total general revenues 33,905,576 34,842,688
13,875,213 11,912,347
Net position – beginning, as previously reported 232,892,436 220,980,089
Change in accounting principle (21,451,167) –
Net position – beginning, as restated 211,441,269 220,980,089
Net position – ending 225,316,482$ 232,892,436$
2015
Change in net position
Clean Opinion on Basic Financial Statements
No Findings in Internal Controls and
Compliance Testing and Minnesota Legal
Compliance
City is experiencing Continued Improvement in
Overall Financial Results
Noted Continued Ongoing Assessment of
Financial Projections and Results, Including
General, Other Operational, and Enterprise
Fund Activities
Financial Records in Excellent Condition
SUMMARY
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.B.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator
Item Activity:
Subject:May Speak Up, Edina Presentation Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
No action requested.
INTRODUCTION:
Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas
and opinions from residents. Since January 2014, organized monthly discussions have been held on the site.
The May 2016 discussion focused on 50th & France. 50th & France, Edina’s downtown, has a long history as a
successful retail area. Current-day 50th & France is home to a variety of business, shops and restaurants. It is
also the center of several annual events, including the Edina Art Fair, Open Streets on 50th, Pumpkin Fest and
more. The City of Edina owns and maintains the parking ramps in the district and maintains the sidewalks. One of
Edina Liquor’s three locations is also located at 50th & France.
The City asked the following questions:
Do you visit 50th & France? Why or why not? How often?
What do you like most about 50th & France? What about it draws you to visit?
What do you think of the events hosted at 50th & France?
Are there any business types or industries that are missing from the 50th & France mix that the City could
help recruit?
The discussion was open for comments between April 27 and June 13. During that time, 43 comments were
made. Additionally, 1,500 users visited the site 1,864 times, garnering 6,889 page views. All commenters in this
discussion were from Edina.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Comments from Speak Up, Edina
Speak Up Edina Presentation 2016-06-21
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
19 4 43 1 12
PARTICIPANTS TOPICS ANSWERS REPLIES VOTES
SUMMARY OF TOPICS
EVENTS 11 Answers · 1 Replies
What do you think of the events hosted at 50th & France?
Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 06, 2016 5:00 pm
0 Votes
The Edina Art Fair is a great event - enjoyed by many people. However, its popularity
means at it is crowded and more difficult to get to. It has been years since I've gone. As
an older adult, I'm in a downsizing mode, so don't have much interest in new stuff - more
in pleasant engaging experiences. I love art, but find more enjoyment in an uncrowded
museum. The same goes for other events - the more successful and crowded they are,
the less likely I'll be interested in coming.
The one event that I would like to see in an annual film festival. I think there may have
been one in the past, but it wasn't very highly promoted. If the annual Twin Cities film
festival were to have showings in Edina, I would definitely be a heavy user, as the drive
to downtown just isn't very convenient.
Response:
Jordan Gilgenbach · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 25, 2016 9:39 pm
Joel, you're correct. There was a film festival a few years ago. With the iconic Edina
Theater, it would be great to see some sort of film festival event come back! Thanks
for your comment!
Laura Kondrick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 7:31 am
1 Votes
I never go to these. The Edina Art Fair has grown to a huge size and is a victim of its
popularity.
Mary Wiley · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 4:10 pm
0 Votes
I agree with previous posters. It's been years since we felt like battling the crowds to
attend the Art Fair and we've never attended the other festivals. I'm not sure we were
even aware of them. We do attend events when held at Braemar.
1 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
Kitty O'Dea · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 4:41 pm
1 Votes
We went to all the events when the kids were young, but now that they're grown we
don't. Hate the traffic, congestion of the Art Fair on my neighborhood. It seems like
White Oaks area has more restricted parking than the narrow streets further west. I saw
signs prohibiting parking on both sides of the street in White Oaks (eg 48th street,
Townes Road, Bridge Lane etc....)
Louise Weaver · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 6:40 pm
0 Votes
I also avoid large crowds, and am older so I don't attend the family focused events. I'm
glad they are offered though. I love to sit waiting for a bus, and people watch.
Sometimes I strike up a conversation with someone passing by, etc. It is a fun creative
atmosphere.
Kristan Frend · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 9:45 pm
0 Votes
I have young kids and went to the art fest once with them and it was stressfully crowded.
We quickly left. I find the events just another traffic hassle and try to avoid the area as
much as possible on those weekends. This means avoiding the businesses that I would
normally visit such as The Barre.
Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 10:21 pm
0 Votes
I like the art fair and do enjoy attending, but parking has again become increasingly
difficult. Particularly with the narrowing of area streets and the parking restrictions make
attending that much less enjoyable or worthwhile. Also, the vendors seem to be getting
consistently more expensive and less crafty, of sorts. I'm not sure if the organizers are
being more selective as to vendors or what is creating the change, but that also has
made it less enjoyable.
Jim Stromberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 11:32 am
0 Votes
Love the Edina Art Fair. Sure, it's busy and crowded - but that's what an art fair is. If it
didn't draw like it does, it would soon go away, and that would be a huge loss to the
community. I get a big "kid-fix" at Halloween by wandering around the streets and
enjoying the little ones all dressed up for the day. The merchants of the area have done
a great job of putting that together, and I'm sure the parents of all those little tikes enjoy
the day as much as I do meandering around them. The trees, pots and other deco all
year long are great, as is the large tree and lighting ceremony at holiday time. The
notion of a film festival would certainly be welcomed by those who attend the Theatre -
certainly worth considering that idea!
2 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
Elizabeth x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 31, 2016 12:45 pm
0 Votes
Never go to anything other than the 4th of July parade (not really a 50th and France
thing.) In fact, if we know the Art Fair or anything else is going on, we make purposeful
plans to avoid the area because it is so crowded.
K.B. Montgomery · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 03, 2016 7:44 pm
0 Votes
I am wondering if the city polls the businesses in the area to get a sense of their feelings
about the Art Fair and what it does to their business. From those with whom I have
spoken, the Fair drives away their regular customers. Perhaps, the city could survey local
businesses and nearby residents to gauge their feelings about the Fair. A change of
venue might be in order if the fair is no longer achieving its original goals.
VISITING 50TH & FRANCE 14 Answers · 0 Replies
Do you visit 50th & France? Why or why not? How often?
Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 06, 2016 4:50 pm
1 Votes
Living just south of the Crosstown between France and Xerxes, my shopping orbit is most
confined the Southdale area businesses. Maybe once a month I come up for a movie at
the Edina Theatre for its varied independent and international films generally not
available at AMC Southdale. Occasionally, I will do some shopping in the area or go to a
restaraunt. I would say that the congestion around France and the Crosstown is sort of a
barrier to making the drive. When I was younger, if it had been more friendly to doing
so, I could have ridden my bike up to 50th and France, but the two major options for
doing this - France and Xerxes feel much too congested to this safely, and I'm not really
sure how much safe bike storage is available in the 50th and France district.
David Frenkel · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 25, 2016 9:28 pm
1 Votes
I primarily go to 50th/France for General Sports which is actually in Minneapolis. It is a
difficult area to park but it is close. I only bike through there late at night when the traffic
is minimal otherwise the streets are too narrow to safely bike.
Laura Kondrick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 7:28 am
0 Votes
I rarely list 50th and France. It is a bit upscale and I am not always comfortable there.
Parking lots are scary and grim especially at night.
Mary Wiley · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 4:07 pm
1 Votes
3 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
I may go to 50th and France once a year to have lunch with friends. Otherwise I never go
there. It is not convenient from southwest Edina and the traffic and parking are horrible. I
agree with Laura that prices are high there. I feel that I do better shopping at Galleria,
believe it or not.
wally norlander · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 4:34 pm
1 Votes
I visit 50th and France nearly weekly. I frequent the Edina Theater, Lunds, Edina Liquors,
and my eye doctor. It is my go-to "downtown," and I hope to see it thrive. Parking is an
ongoing hassle.
Greg Daggett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · May 26, 2016 4:39 pm
0 Votes
Enjoy walking there from Morningside area or ubering in the winter. Modify liquor
ordinances to keep bars open longer. We would go longer. And you would be able to
compete with Red Cow and Minneapolis.
Louise Weaver · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 6:32 pm
1 Votes
I transfer buses there at least once a week. The coop is just a few blocks north at 44th &
France. I frequent Lunds, Caribou, Starbucks, YogurtLab, US Bank, the Post Office, and
love the cooking shops. For the 'why or why not' (other than I can't afford it) I will give
some suggestions following: There is definitely the snub-factor going on at 50th &
France, but I actually don't mind it as, I believe it keeps criminal activity down and
encourages only serious shoppers with money to spend. I've seen this in other cities'
upscale shopping districts and it works. There doesn't seem to be a problem with
homeless panhandlers, which is a big plus, as they are very intimidating and ruin the fun
shopping experience in places I've been before, as they do in downtown Minneapolis. I
think, if you want the folksy street fair experience with low cost accommodations, there
are plenty of those environments in the Twin-Cities to choose from. Stick with the unique
upscale character of Edina and of 5oth & France for which they are known.
Traffic is a big drawback with the noise, exhaust, congestion, and rapidly moving
vehicles within feet of shoppers and café tables on the sidewalks. I see backed up traffic
usually, when I am there, with lines a block or two long to get through a traffic light. I
was on the bus this week going north from 5oth and it took waiting though almost three
stop lights to get past Walgreens, with cars trying to turn right and left and the traffic
having go maneuver around parked cars! There must be some kind of solution to route
the traffic around the district and make the streets more quiet. Or cut out the wide
sidewalks to make room for more lanes of traffic; then open up the shops from the
backsides to create the promenade. Either would give the area a more historic mellow
European vibe, taking advantage of the internal brick walkways and offering more
outdoor seating.
4 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
I suggest the iconic Edina theater sign be subsidized for upkeep by the city of Edina,
somehow. It really is an important landmark and having parts of it not lit makes the area
look poorly. It is a big beautiful welcome sign for everyone to the area and adds
excitement to the shopping experience I would add more green space with trees and
refurbish the plantings already there. The daylily bed and some trees look kind of
haggard and neglected. The planters need to be positioned so they do not block the
street view for people waiting for the bus. The benches should really be positioned so
that they are close to the bus stops. Benches give riders a place to wait, without
standing in front of businesses for long periods. Winter is difficult as the sidewalks are
not well maintained when it snows. Only a path is plowed, leaving mounds of snow on
and around the benches, and blocking crosswalks. Benches could use a coat of paint
more often, with paint color uniform for benches and trash cans, etc. maybe even the
fronts of shops which should be kept up. When a store closes, the store front could be
covered from the inside with a standard decorative paper for the district, until the space
is reopened. I've seen this done successfully in Kansas Cities' Plaza. That simple thing
can make the district look cared for, which promotes better business.
Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 9:59 pm
0 Votes
I would likely frequent the area more often parking was available. The parking lots are
often congested and there is limited available parking. Opting to make a quick stop
anywhere in the area is becoming increasingly more difficult and not worth the attempt.
With that said, I am unsure if there are still proposed new residential developments at
the Walgreens corner, but I hope not!! That area CANNOT sustain more traffic and the
city absolutely needs to take traffic and parking in consideration when new
developments are proposed! More high density housing or commercial for that matter,
in that area, is just not viable and I sincerely hope the city realizes this.
Brian H. · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 7:25 am
0 Votes
I visit about once every 2 months - either Edina Grill or Edina Theater. Parking though
tight has never been insurmountable, I always find a place. ---I have an odd reason for
not visiting more, Clancy's Drug left. To me this was the final turning point - the
character of 50th changed to being more upscale shopping restaurants etc. that were
more of an "here today gone tomorrow nature." Said another way, the character
changed to more of an big city feel - it is depressing to go there.
Related: With all the new construction in the Southdale area, I find myself doing
more and more shoping in the Eden Prairie mall, etc. - it is much more relaxing. So what
happened (for me) with 50th is happening again.
Jim Stromberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 11:21 am
0 Votes
As I live in the area (by design), I'm always around the 50th and France 'life'. It is
engaging, welcoming, and fun. The shops are great, and I'm always greeted and made
to feel appreciated. The eating establishments are varied and reasonable, and there is
much to choose from - all within walking distance of each other. From Walgreen's, L &
5 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
B's, the liquor store, to the coffee shops, one is able to find everything of note in the
general area. I visit the businesses daily, and love the area.
The recent improvements to the three parking areas have certainly updated the 'feel' to
them, and the signage on France help drivers find parking is easily available. To those
who feel parking is an issue in the area, I'd suggest visiting again. Maybe part of the
parking issue for many is that lots of people want shopping center convenience (right by
the door). At 50th and France, strolling to the different shops is part of the experience.
Other improvements that started last year include the building 'face' of 50th, and the
re-setting of the stone walks. Hopefully, that will continue this summer. It is a great
area that has a huge 'draw' to it! And, I can't wait for the Art Fair next weekend!
Tracey Hester · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 27, 2016 9:53 pm
0 Votes
I go to 50th and France regularly. It's near my sons preschool so I am in the vicinity and
give up Starbucks or grocery items from time to time. My husband and I like the
restaurants and the variety. My only complaint is its so crowded and not pedestrian
friend and parking can be a pain.
DA Crawford · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 30, 2016 9:39 pm
0 Votes
Love the 50th & France area. I go for the restaurants, shopping and occasional art
shows etc...
Elizabeth x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 31, 2016 12:34 pm
0 Votes
I drive through the US bank branch nearly every week or so - but rarely stop. Maybe
once every 6-8 weeks we hit up Red Cow, Caribou, Rice Paper or Bario. Sur La
Table,Cooks of Crocus Hill and Anthropologie at the holidays. The Lunds/Byerlys store is a
nightmare for actually parking and shopping. I think I like "the idea" of 50th an France
more than "the actual experience" of going there, parking and walking around.
K.B. Montgomery · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 03, 2016 7:36 pm
0 Votes
I visit twice a month for service based-businesses such as the bank, post office and
theatre. Because I prefer to be able to park my car and safely walk to a number of
places, I prefer a more pedestrian friendly environment for frequent visits to grocery
stores, coffee shops, restaurants, library, etc. Linden Hills is an easy place to visit with a
Walkscore of 81; 50th and France has a Walkscore of 49. While there are cars and traffic
in Linden Hills, it has been designed primarily for pedestrians and bikes vs. cars. Part of
the Linden Hills' appeal is the low density and building set backs. A focus on trees,
green, a vibrant streetscape, more locally owned businesses and restaurants all make a
difference in attracting a broad demographic to the area. In recent development
projects, Edina has chosen to allow the building envelope to encroach on sidewalks,
creating a less inviting pedestrian climate. Biking in the 50th and France area is also a
challenge. 50th and France will be met with increasing challenges as boomers, Gen X'rs
and millennials look for increased walk and bike-ablilty as well as mass transit in the
6 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
places they choose to live.
LIKE MOST 7 Answers · 0 Replies
What do you like most about 50th & France? What about it draws you to
visit?
Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 06, 2016 4:51 pm
0 Votes
The movie theatre is the biggest draw. It is a very pleasant place to be once you get
there and successfully park your car.
David Frenkel · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 25, 2016 9:29 pm
0 Votes
Yes, nice theater but don't use it often enough. General Sports is a good sporting good
store with good customer service.
Kitty O'Dea · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 4:33 pm
1 Votes
Wide variety of services in one place.
Louise Weaver · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 6:47 pm
0 Votes
As I mentioned, I love to sit waiting for a bus, and people watch. Sometimes I strike up a
conversation with someone passing by, etc. It is a fun creative atmosphere. I transfer
buses there at least once a week. The coop is just a few blocks north at 44th & France. I
frequent Lunds, Caribou, Starbucks, YogurtLab, US Bank, the Post Office, and love the
cooking shops. I like that it is small and selective about what goes in there. I like the
brick walkways, hallways, plantings, and lighting which are very romantic.
Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 10:02 pm
1 Votes
I find the small town quaint appeal of down town Edina my favorite part about it. I hope
it can retain that type of atmosphere.
Jim Stromberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 11:25 am
0 Votes
I like that IF I can't find what I need or am looking for, I don't really need it. The area is
simply full of life! Come visit at Christmas-time, Halloween (where the merchants go
7 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
ALL-OUT!), or art fair time. It is a great place!
Elizabeth x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 31, 2016 12:36 pm
0 Votes
The restaurants are a nice location when you need to meet people from Uptown or South
Minneapolis. I mainly go there to have business coffees or lunches.
BUSINESSES 11 Answers · 0 Replies
Are there any business types or industries that are missing from the 50th
& France mix that the City could help recruit?
Joel Stegner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 06, 2016 5:07 pm
0 Votes
I think that you have a good mix of businesses, but that the issue is to get people to
shop at multiple stores when they do make the trip. I know for example in Hopkins,
sometimes there are special offers of seeing a movie and getting a discount on a meal,
which turns a trip into an occasion. I'm not aware that businesses are working together
that way. Let's say that someone goes to a restaurant. They are offered a recipe as a
thank you, which a shopping list. They could walk over the Lund's/Byerly's and pick up
the cooking ingredients and stop at the cooking store to pick up any specialty items they
might need for preparation, with a stop at Edina Liquor with a recommended wine to go
with the meal. That would over time change the mind set of the 50th and France
customer to using 50th and France like a mall - access to everything you need in one
walkable place.
David Frenkel · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 25, 2016 9:31 pm
0 Votes
I miss the old Lotus that used to be near the movie theater.
Amy Campbell · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 25, 2016 9:35 pm
1 Votes
It would be great to see a couple fashion forward, affordable local boutiques like Primp
for men and women. Same for a home boutique! Local, healthy food in the form of a
grocery/coop or farmers market. Quick, non-waited table healthy & local food An Edina
municipal Brewery/wine bar with a patio & good food.
Laura Kondrick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 7:35 am
0 Votes
I like the coop idea. Affordable stores would be nice. I shop chain discount stores and
second hand stores mostly. A flea market would be fun!
8 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
Jennifer Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 9:03 am
1 Votes
I would love to see a kids book / toy store so our walks to the yogurt lab could include
another fun / educational element...
Kitty O'Dea · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 4:44 pm
0 Votes
Inexpensive casual restaurant like Panera. The one on Hazelton is always busy. Nice for
our student population
Louise Weaver · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 7:17 pm
0 Votes
This area is family friendly and adding more attractions for kids, like an upscale
educational toy store and a small book store (for adults too) is a great idea as Jennifer
has mentioned. Maybe a shop having to do with science for kids. Grab and go food
could have more offerings, but keep the big chains out. This area's strong point is that
they are mostly small unique upscale businesses. Outreach to some of the other
successful small shops and restaurants in other neighborhoods to open another shop at
50th & France. Kingsfield had a fun special offering of barbecue and Asian one night last
week. It would be fun to have special events like that. There often seems to be a lot of
tourists; and better permanent maps and attractive readable signs posted everywhere
would help. I often get asked questions for directions while I'm just sitting on a bench.
So, it seems that exploring what is available and finding things is a little difficult. I would
definitely take the parking and loading off street. Think European, quaint, romantic, and
fun (in my opinion).
Kristan Frend · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 9:54 pm
2 Votes
May be a bit idealistic, but I'd love a bookstore for all ages with a community feel
(storytimes for kids, a place for bookclubs to meet). Yoga studio.
Jim Stromberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 11:37 am
0 Votes
I agree on earlier postings, especially an integrated 'program' that encourages people to
shop at multiple stores. I think, too, that a bookstore would be great - can you
encourage Rumpus to open a second store? :)
Elizabeth x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 31, 2016 12:47 pm
0 Votes
I would go out of my way for a Magers & Quinn type bookstore. We do not need more
overpriced athletic wear/yoga togs shops.
9 of 10 Full Report
50th & France
Closed Jun 13, 2016 · Discussion · 19 Participants · 4 Topics · 43 Answers · 1 Replies · 12 Votes
K.B. Montgomery · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 03, 2016 7:52 pm
0 Votes
I agree with other writers that a bookstore, healthy food options like a co-op and farm to
table restaurants would be attractive. If all of the above could be combined with more
trees and green spaces as well as better walk-ability and bike-ability, I would definitely
visit the area more often.
10 of 10 Full Report
The CITY of EDINA
Speak Up, Edina!
May Discussion: 50th & France
The CITY of EDINA www.SpeakUpEdina.org
EdinaMN.gov 2
The CITY of EDINA 50th & France
•Do you visit 50th & France? Why or why not? How Often?
•What do you like most about 50th & France? What about it
draws you to visit?
•What do you think of the events hosted at 50th & France?
•Are there any business types or industries that are missing
from the 50th & France mix that the City should help recruit?
EdinaMN.gov 3
The CITY of EDINA May Discussion
•Open April 27 to June 13
•43 comments made
•1,500 visitors, 1,864 total visits
•6,889 page views
•All commenters from Edina
EdinaMN.gov 4
The CITY of EDINA
•The area has a nice variety of stores.
•Everything is within walking distance,
though walkability and bike-ability can be
challenging.
•The Theater is loved by many but may be
underused.
•Has a “small town downtown” appeal.
•The entire district is very lively.
•Would like to see a farmers market or coop,
brewery with patio seating.
•More affordable stores and restaurants.
•Explore a district-wide shopping program.
•A bookstore is desired by some.
•The Edina Art Fair and other major events
are great, but crowds and traffic sometimes
a deterrent.
•Parking availability and traffic continues to
be a major concern for visitors.
•It’s a fun, creative atmosphere.
•Concerns for business customer traffic
during events.
•50th & France is upscale, expensive, too
much so for some.
•Ensure maintenance of Edina Theater sign.
•Add more green spaces.
Comment Analysis
EdinaMN.gov 5
The CITY of EDINA Speak Up, Edina!
•Current discussion: Recycling Services
•Open until July 11
•SpeakUpEdina.org
EdinaMN.gov 6
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: VII.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Ordinance No. 2016-08 & Resolution No. 2016-60
Rezoning from PCD-4 to PUD-1, Phoenix Plaza at
3901 70th Street for Hector Vinas
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Adopt Resolution No. 2016-60. Grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2016-08. Second Reading would be at the
time of Final Rezoning & Final Development Plan.
INTRODUCTION:
On May 25, 2016 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning. Vote: 5 Ayes and 2 Nays.
The Commission added two conditions. One is to provide year-round screening on the west lot line and the other
is to provide over story trees in the boulevard if possible. Those conditions are added in the approving resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Planning Commission Staff Report
Resolution No. 2016-60
Ordinance No. 2016-08
Planning Commission Minutes
Com Dev Director Presentation 2016-06-21
Developer Presentation 2016-06-21
ORDINANCE NO. 2016-08
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-8, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-8
DISTRICT AT 7700 FRANCE AVENUE
The City Of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 36-488. - Planned Unit Development District-1 (PUD-1), Phoenix Plaza at 6996 France Avenue &
3901 70th Street.
(a) Legal description. The east 215 feet of the south 190 feet of the southeast quarter of Section
30, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County Minnesota; and
That part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 677, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying
West of a line parallel with and 50 feet Westerly of the East line of Section 31, Township 28,
Range 24.
(b) Approved plans.
(1) 6996 France. Incorporated herein by reference are the FE 70 LLC plans received by the city
on February 24, 2012, March 2, 2012 and March 14, 2012, including the building plans, except
as amended by city council Resolution No. 2012-39, on file in the office of the planning
department under file number 2011-011.11a.
(2) 3901 70th Street. Incorporated herein by reference are the plans received by the city on
_________, 2016, including the building plans, except as amended by city council Resolution
No. 2016-__, on file in the office of the planning department under file number 2016-0007a.
(c) Principal uses. All principal uses allowed in the PCD-1 zoning district, except drive-through
uses, bakeries, coffee shops. In addition the following uses are allowed:
(1) Catering.
(2) Clothing store over 2,500 square feet.
(3) Department store.
(4) Dry goods.
(5) Electrical and appliance store.
(6) Furniture store.
(7) Medical offices up to a maximum of 7,950 square feet total for the site.
(8) Office supplies.
(9) Paint and wallpaper.
(10) Sporting goods.
If the entire building at 6996 France is occupied by retail uses, then the mezzanine shall be turned into
storage space and shall not be used for retail.
2
(d) Accessory uses.
(1) Off-street parking facilities.
(2) Produce stands, pursuant to permit issued by the city manager.
(3) Signs allowed per the PCD-1 district standards, except as follows:
a. Wall signage on the two sides of the southeast corner of the building shall not
exceed two feet by 13 feet in size.
b. There shall be no window signage above the entry doors on the first level.
c. The monument sign setback shall be three feet from the right-of-way.
(e) Conditional uses. There are no conditional uses for Planned Unit Development District-1
(PUD-1).
(f) Development standards. Development standards per the PCD-1 zoning district, except the
following:
(1) Building setbacks.
a. Front—France Avenue: 16 feet.
b. Side Street—70th Street South: ten feet.
c. Side—North: 39 feet.
d. Rear—West: 68 feet.
(2) Parking lot setbacks.
a. Front.
1. France Avenue: ten feet.
2. 70th Street: four feet.
b. Side: Four feet.
0 feet on the west lot line of 6901 70th Street
(3) Building height: one story.
(4) Maximum floor area ratio: 37 percent.
(g) Drive-through uses. Coffee shops, bakeries and banks, medical office over 7,950 square feet,
and retail space over 6,600 square feet shall be prohibited.
Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
3
ATTEST:
______________________________ _____________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on:
Send two affidavits of publication.
Bill to Edina City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify
that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of _______, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2016.
________________________________
City Clerk
The CITY of EDINA
Rezoning to PUD-1
3901 70th Street
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 2
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 3
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 4
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 5
The CITY of EDINA Revisions from Sketch Plan:
www.EdinaMN.gov 6
Increased the boulevard for greater planting between streets and sidewalks
on France Avenue.
Increased setback on France Avenue for greater front yard landscaping.
Increased glazing on France Avenue and 70th Street.
The CITY of EDINA This Request Requires:
www.EdinaMN.gov 7
Preliminary Rezoning to PUD – Rezoning from PCD-4, Planned
Commercial District-4, to PUD-1, Planned Unit Development-1,
Phoenix Plaza.
The Rezoning would expand the existing PUD-1, Phoenix Plaza to the
north, to include this property.
The CITY of EDINA Two-Step Development Review Process:
www.EdinaMN.gov 8
•1st Step Requires:
Preliminary Rezoning & Development Plan
•2nd Step (3 Votes required of City Council):
Final Rezoning and Development Plan (Review by City Council)
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 9
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 10
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 11
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 12
The CITY of EDINA Primary Issue
Is the PUD Zoning Appropriate?
www.EdinaMN.gov 13
The CITY of EDINA Is the PUD Zoning
Appropriate? Yes, for the following reasons:
1. Fits the neighborhood, small scale development on small
lot
(expansion of PUD-1, Phoenix Plaza-same zoning
standards.)
2. Generate less traffic than existing use.
3. PUD limits the uses on the site
4. Ensures this specific building is constructed.
www.EdinaMN.gov 14
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 15
City Standard (PCD-1) Proposed Phoenix
Plaza/Vitamin
Shop Site
PUD-1
Building Setbacks
Front – France Avenue
Front – 70th Street
Side – South
Rear – West
Parking Lot Setbacks
Front – France Avenue
Front – 70th Street
Side – South & West
35 feet
35 feet
25 feet
25 feet
20 feet
20 feet
10 feet
20 feet
15 feet
45 feet
68 feet
13 feet
6 feet
5&0 feet
16 feet
10 feet
39 feet
68 feet
10 feet
4 feet
4 feet
Building Height Four Stories One Story
One Story
Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 100%
Lot size = 26,906 s.f.
30%
Gross s.f. = 8,030 s.f.
37%
Gross s.f. = 6,600
s.f.
Parking Stalls
49 40 stalls 34 stalls
Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ 8.5 x 18’
Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet 24 feet
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 16
The CITY of EDINA
Recommendation
www.EdinaMN.gov 17
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 18
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 19
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 20
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 21
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 22
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 23
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 24
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 25
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 26
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 27
The CITY of EDINA Is the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Reasonable?
Yes. For the following reasons:
1. Land Use is Consistent with the area.
2. The proposed development is within the height and density
guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan.
3. Comp. Plan recognizes the CAC as the most intense
district in
terms of uses, height and coverage. (Density reasonable
compared to recent development in the twin cities.)
4. Traffic Study – Roads would support the density increase. www.EdinaMN.gov 28
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 29
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 30
DJR ARCHITECTURE INC.EDINA RETAIL BUILDING 3901 70th St W, Edina, MN
Ed
i
n
a
R
e
t
a
i
l
D
J
R
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
I
N
C
.
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
SI
T
E
W
7
0
t
h
S
t
France Avenue S
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
N
DJR ARCHITECTURE INC.Edina Retail 3
Pr
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
s
-
P
h
o
e
n
i
x
P
l
a
z
a
Ed
i
n
a
R
e
t
a
i
l
D
J
R
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
I
N
C
.
4
Pr
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
s
-
B
a
n
k
o
f
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
DJR ARCHITECTURE INC.Edina Retail 5
Si
t
e
P
l
a
n
28’ SetbackBike Racks
Ar
b
o
r
V
i
t
a
e
a
l
o
n
g
We
s
t
s
i
d
e
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
LE
G
E
N
D
:
SC
H
E
D
U
L
E
:
Ed
i
n
a
R
e
t
a
i
l
D
J
R
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
I
N
C
.
6
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Northeast View
DJR ARCHITECTURE INC.Edina Retail 7
Ex
t
e
r
i
o
r
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
East Elevation
SI
G
N
A
G
E
Ed
i
n
a
R
e
t
a
i
l
D
J
R
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
I
N
C
.
8
North Elevation
Ex
t
e
r
i
o
r
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
SI
G
N
A
G
E
DJR ARCHITECTURE INC.Edina Retail 9
Ex
t
e
r
i
o
r
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
West Elevation
SI
G
N
A
G
E
SIGNAGE
Ed
i
n
a
R
e
t
a
i
l
D
J
R
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
I
N
C
.
10
Ex
t
e
r
i
o
r
E
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
South Elevation
SI
G
N
A
G
E
DJR ARCHITECTURE INC.Edina Retail 11
Ea
s
t
V
i
e
w
Northeast View
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
V
i
e
w
Southwest View
Pe
r
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
V
i
e
w
s
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: VII.B.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation, Request For
Purchase
From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Resolution No.2016-61, Site Plan Review to remodel
and expand 7625 Cahill Road for Mini Storage, Buhl
Investors.
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve Resolution No. 2016-61.
INTRODUCTION:
On June 8, 2016, The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposed Site Plan
subject to the findings and conditions in the Planning Commission Staff report. Commissioner Lee suggested, that
the applicant consider toning down the color use on the front building façade, but did not add as a condition of
approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Planning Commission Staff Report
Resolution No. 2016-61
Planning Commission Minutes
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Braemar Winter Recreation Area Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Staff requests direction from the City Council to proceed with the winter recreation area design, feasibility study
and bid documents.
INTRODUCTION:
On June 7th the City Council received a preliminary trail design and pro formas for the winter recreation area at
Braemar Park. The City Council requested a presentation at the June 21st City Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Staff Report: Winter Recreation Proposal
Winter Recreation Site Map
SEH Letter Agreement
Winter Recreation Braemar Presentation 2016-06-21
June 21, 2016
Mayor and City Council
Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director
Braemar Winter Recreation Area Proposal
Information / Background:
At the May 17 City Council meeting, the City Council authorized staff to proceed with a financial and trail
feasibility study for cross-country ski trails and snow tubing at Braemar Park. On May 18 SEH, Morton Trails
and RRC began work on the feasibility studies. Noah Brautigam from Morton Trails immediately began
working onsite designing the trail. The Morton Trails proposal includes a 3km trail with man-made snow.
At the June 7 City Council Work Session, Dave Belin, RRC Associates, presented a preliminary financial
feasibility report. The short (10 week) and long (12 week) season pro forma information is included in this
report as is a new pro forma showing the operational feasibility of a Nordic ski trail without a snow tubing
area. Paul Pasko from SEH presented the trail alignment proposal along with a detailed description and
photographs of the Hyland Lake Park Reserve (Hyland) cross-country ski trails and snowmaking
infrastructure.
Morton Trails believes that there is potential for a first-rate trail system at Braemar Park. Noah Brautigam
provided the following description:
Assuming that some small amount of excavation is possible, it should be possible to make all of the
trails skiable and fun, with a range of terrain for different skill/comfort levels. The lower trails that
loop around the mellow tubing hill, up the existing cart path, and around the knoll back to the
parking area, will be very good beginner terrain for skiers and possibly snowshoers. Once skiers
begin to climb up the hillside into the forest, a great intermediate trail will loop around the
northeastern knoll before descending back down to the top of the tubing hill or possibly to the
most northeastern tee box. From the highest point of the intermediate loop, skiers have the option
to descend along the ridgeline on a fun, twisting, and high-intermediate to advanced trail that will
take them all the way to the southernmost knoll of the forested hillside east of the golf course. The
trail as it is currently laid out in concept is at least 3km, with approximately 30% beginner, 20%
intermediate and 50% advanced terrain. This trail network will serve the community of Edina, as well
STAFF REPORT Page 2
as surrounding areas, with first-rate skiing and winter sports. It also has the potential to host great
local events for all ages and ability levels.
RRC provided financial pro formas factoring both 10-week and 12-week seasons. Historical weather
information shows that on most years the winter recreation area could be operational by Dec. 20. Interest
in outdoor winter recreation begins to diminish when weather begins to warm up at the end of the winter,
when the natural snow melts and snow turns to rain. A closing date would likely fall in the range of the end
of February to the middle of March. Both the short and long seasons are expected to be operationally cash
flow positive.
The following schedule shows the original schedule and a new schedule to reflect the project delay.
Project Timeline Summary Original Schedule Updated Schedule
Park Board Review and Comment April 2016 Completed
City Council Presentation May 2016 Completed
Hire Design and Consulting Team May 2016 Completed
Feasibility and Design May - June 2016 Underway
City Council Feasibility Study Check In June 7, 2016 Completed
Public Open House Late June 2016 July 13, 2016
Park Board Review July12, 2016 Aug. 8, 2016
Complete Study July 25, 2016 Aug. 19, 2016
City Council Presentation/Bid Authorization Aug. 2, 2016 Sept. 7, 2016
Bid Project August 2016 Sept. 8 – Oct. 5, 2016
Bid Award Sept. 20, 2016 Oct. 18, 2016
Bond Sale Dec. 2016 – Jan. 2017 Dec. 2016 – Jan. 2017
Construction Winter 2016 – Fall 2017 Winter 2016 – Fall 2017
Open December 2017 December 2017
STAFF REPORT Page 3
Project Timeline Breakdown:
If the project continues to move forward with the feasibility study and winter recreation area design and bid
documents, the following specific actions and key milestones will occur over the next two months:
Neighborhood Sound Study – neighborhood will be notified via mailing Week of June 22 or 27
Continue the Design of Snow Making System using the Final Layout for
the Snow Tubing Area and/or Cross-Country Ski Trails June 22
Send Invitations to Neighborhood Meeting to Affected Nearby Property
Owners June 29
Conduct Neighborhood Meeting at the Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse to
Review 90% Complete Study with Stakeholders July 13
Submit 90% Complete Study to City for Review by Park Board Aug. 1
Park Board Reviews 90% Complete Study Aug. 8
Submit Complete Study to the City Aug. 29
Council Considers the Study and Authorizes Advertisement for Bids Sept. 7
Pro Forma Without Snow Tubing
One option briefly discussed at the City Council Work Session was the opportunity to add Nordic skiing,
but not snow tubing. While staff and the consulting team believe that it would be a popular option for
families and drive additional revenue and visitors to the park, it is possible to separate the operations,
although the Nordic-only option would require additional subsidy. For some operational expenses the
allocation of expenses to Nordic is higher and for other expenses it is lower. It turns out the total operating
expense for Nordic-only is about 50% of the total operating expense for the combined operation, even
though each line item expense was allocated individually. The short season for Nordic skiing only never
reaches operating profitability, while the long season is barely in the red by years four and five, but never
reaches positive cash flow.
Braemar Golf Course Operational Support
These pro formas include operational support from the golf enterprise which is estimated at approximately
$50,000. This creates a hybrid of an enterprise and general fund operation. Staff does not recommend
including the winter recreation area as part of the golf enterprise budget, but instead part of the Parks &
Recreation general fund budget. If the $50,000 in Braemar golf course staff time that is utilized for the
winter recreation area is coded from the golf staffing budget to the winter recreation staffing budget, the
winter recreation area would operate cash flow negatively and would require tax subsidy to operate, similar
to the outdoor ice rinks.
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Nordic Skiing Only Pro Forma
Nordic Skiing and Tubing Pro Forma
SUMMARY - SHORT SEASON 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
Nordic Revenue $50,438 $54,073 $58,602 $62,597 $64,035
Tubing Revenue $69,240 $72,031 $74,802 $77,550 $80,272
Total Revenue $119,678 $126,104 $133,403 $140,147 $144,306
Operating Expenses $119,430 $121,819 $124,864 $127,362 $130,546
Operating Cash Flow $247 $4,284 $8,539 $12,785 $13,761
Operating Margin 0.2%3.4%6.4%9.1%9.5%
Depreciation $18,576 $18,948 $18,948 $19,326 $19,326
Net Cash Flow -$18,329 -$14,663 -$10,409 -$6,541 -$5,566
Net Cash Flow Margin -15.3%-11.6%-7.8%-4.7%-3.9%
SUMMARY - LONG SEASON 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
Nordic Revenue $57,495 $61,386 $66,331 $70,616 $72,356
Tubing Revenue $81,480 $84,801 $88,099 $91,372 $94,616
Total Revenue $138,975 $146,187 $154,430 $161,988 $166,972
Operating Expenses $134,359 $137,046 $140,473 $143,282 $146,864
Operating Cash Flow $4,616 $9,141 $13,958 $18,706 $20,108
Operating Margin 3.3%6.3%9.0%11.5%12.0%
Depreciation $18,576 $18,948 $18,948 $19,326 $19,326
Net Cash Flow -$13,960 -$9,807 -$4,990 -$620 $782
Net Cash Flow Margin -10.0%-6.7%-3.2%-0.4%0.5%
STAFF REPORT Page 5
Tax Impact
The tax impact of a $3 million bond sale would be approximately $360,000 annually or 1.5% in addition to
the proposed 4.9% increase in the 2016-2017 budget.
Budget Estimate
The $3 million construction estimate is only a preliminary estimate based on a per kilometer price as
compared to similar facilities already bid or constructed. Hyland winter recreation area has 5km of man-
made snow and cost approximately $5 million to construct. This cost estimate includes design and feasibility
studies, construction and bid documents, construction observation, trail clearing, steel irrigation pipe, steel
pipe corrosion inhibitor, computer controlled pumps, control cabinets, snowmaking equipment, grooming
equipment, electrical for controls, trail lights and snowmaking on the trail and a potential small pump control
building. Our current well building will be utilized for pumps and controls if size and access for equipment
installation and maintenance are adequate.
Why Now?
The renovation of Braemar Golf Course and downsizing the course from 27 to 18 holes converts current
hole #21 on the Clunie 9 to park land and creates access to the wooded hill on the east side of Braemar
Park. The ideal time to construct this trail and snow making infrastructure is while the golf course is under
construction. In order to construct the trail, water pipe, electrical and pump infrastructure efficiently, two
golf holes, #10 and #11 on the east edge of the new golf course would be utilized for equipment installation
and trail clearing removal during golf course construction. If the project is stopped, the Nordic trail could be
constructed in future years with construction access only on the north end of the trail, but it would be
significantly more expensive and more difficult than having access on both the north and south ends of the
trail. The new hole #10, adjacent to the existing city well would be impacted with future construction of a
winter trail with man-made snow.
Additionally, it would be a benefit to the golf enterprise and the Tin Fish restaurant to have a winter
recreation area operational during the year when the golf course is closed for renovation. The golf
enterprise receives 12% of the Tin Fish gross revenues. The Edina High School Nordic ski program may also
lease space in the lower level of the clubhouse, raising additional revenue for the golf enterprise.
STAFF REPORT Page 6
Snow Making Pumps
Snow Making Computer Controller
Piston Bully 100 Snow Groomer
ACTION REQUESTED
Staff requests direction from the City Council to proceed with the winter recreation area design, feasibility
study and bid documents
Woo
d
v
i
e
w
Ct
S
c
h
e
y
D
r
Gle
a
s
o
n
R
d
HydePark Cir
Bonnie Brae Dr
78th St
Tanglewood Ct
Dewey Hill Rd
78th St
John H
a
r
r
i
s
D
r
930
840
850
850
850
870
840
840
860
870
840
850
830
8
7
0
850
850
850
860
870
860
85
0
840
840
830
830
8
6
0
850
910
870
84
0
860
840
870
940
900
920
85
0
920
910
850
930
910
920
860
910
900
830
900
84
0
870
880
860
890
850
Project: EDINA 137403
Created Date: 05/26/2016
Plotted Date: 5/26/2016
Map by: msteuernagelProjection: Hennepin County Coordinates
Sources: Hennepin County, MnGEO, SEH
WINTER RECREATION AT BRAEMAR PARK
WITH MACHINE-MADE SNOW
EDINA, MINNESOTA
FIGURE
1
Legend
Primary Cross Country Ski Alignment
Alternative 1 Cross Country Ski Alignment
Alternative 2 Cross Country Ski Alignment
Tube Lift
Cross Country Ski Alignment Turnaround
Tubing Area
Privately Owned Property
I
0 100 20050Feet
1 inch = 100 feet
SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT
May 11, 2016 RE: City of Edina Winter Recreation Area at Braemar Park SEH No. EDINA136169, 10.00
Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director
Parks and Recreation Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ann:
The City of Edina continues to be the leader in providing its citizens with great amenities. We are excited to have the opportunity to help Edina add its next great amenity, winter recreation at Braemar Park.
Thank you for already including us in several meetings with project stakeholders during the past few months. Exhibit 1 enclosed with this Supplemental Letter Agreement shows that that recreation can
include activities relying on both machine made snow (snow) and natural snow that will not interfere with future golf course operations. For your convenience, this Supplemental Letter Agreement is divided into sections titled Project Understanding, Approach, Team Description, Fee, and Conclusion. Project Understanding
We admire Edina for recognizing the opportunity that reconstructing the 27-hole golf course to 18-holes at
Braemar Park presents to considering adding winter recreation featuring snow. Our experience shows that by considering both projects together now Edina is already addressing the fact that golf and snow are
mutually exclusive. Many communities that have considered adding recreation that features snow to the wide open spaces of their golf course do not address this fact until it is too late. The price for that
tardiness is usually expensive modifications to the golf course. Today golfers want to use a course as late as November and early as March. During November and March snow is usually being made or melting
respectively. We understand this mutual exclusivity. Golfers do not want snow to diminish their late or early season golf experience.
Besides this mutual exclusivity, we will also help the City understand what kind of impacts snow, noise,
and light generated by winter recreation might have on surrounding private property owners. Additionally, and maybe most importantly for some, we will help the City understand the revenues and expenses
winter recreation will present. We have already developed these understandings for other winter recreation areas inside other metropolitan areas.
It is of great benefit to Edina that Braemar Park already has a large lit blacktop parking lot, clubhouse
(containing Tin Fish), and adequate electrical power needed for a former municipal water well (now used for only golf course irrigation) adjacent to the area being considered for winter recreation shown in
Exhibit 1. This well can likely become the source of water needed to make snow.
At a very schematic level, we believe the area shown in Exhibit 1 can physically contain the following opportunities for winter recreation with snow that all of Edina’s property owners and visitors can use even
when natural snow is absent without impacting golf.
1. A lighted cross-country skiing trail featuring snow that is about 2.5 kilometers long (loop). 2. The loop could contain about 30, 20, and 50 percent of beginner, intermediate, and difficult terrain
levels respectively. 3. Because the loop can be 2.5 kilometers long, by completing laps of the entire loop common cross-
country race distances in multiples of 5 kilometers can be achieved. These distances may be
Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302
SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax
Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016
Page 2
attractive to Edina High School’s Nordic Ski Team. Edina could consider hosting high school Nordic
ski races on the loop. A sizable parking lot for cars and buses is already present. Additionally the clubhouse and Tin Fish are probably capable of handling concession needs of potential race athletes,
their coaches, and fans. 4. Because the loop could be power groomed, it could periodically host other trail oriented activities
such as fat-tire style winter biking and snow shoeing. At the conclusion of these activities, the power-groomer can return the trails to cross country skiing.
5. The loop can connect to possible cross-country skiing trails, featuring natural snow that Edina might locate inside of Braemar’s proposed 18-hole golf course.
6. As many as 11 lighted snow tubing lanes that could include as many as 2 handle style tows that return tubers to the top of the hill for another run.
7. Because the snow tubing area could be power groomed, it could periodically host other downhill activities such as sledding or additional intermediate level cross country skiing trails. At the
conclusion of these activities, the power-groomer can return the area to snow tubing.
Off-winter usage opportunities for this area will likely present themselves to Edina too. Edina may wish to consider opportunities such as zip wires, mountain biking, walking, running, and scenic overlooks for
wedding event nuptial services and photography opportunities for wedding parties already using the clubhouse.
Approach
We understand the City would likely sell bonds to pay for this amenity. The bond sale would likely take place during late 2016. This timeframe causes us to simultaneously begin work not just on a feasibility
study (study), but also the bidding documents themselves. Usually bid document preparation does not begin until the City Council (Council) accepts the study. However, this project’s proposed production
schedule below reveals that insufficient time exists to prepare the necessary bidding documents between the Council considering the study and the date the City must open bids from contractors to achieve its
October bond sale.
Proposed Production Schedule Key Milestones
No. Description Date
1 Receive Notice to Proceed May 18, 2016
2 Submit Preliminary Market Analysis/Financial Model Results to the City May 30
3
Park Department Chooses the Final Layout for Snow Tubing Area and
Cross-Country Ski Trails (relying on both snow and natural snow) from the
Base and Alternate Designs for the Snow Tubing and Cross-Country Ski
Trails
June 6 to June 10
4
Council Considers the Preliminary Results of the Market
Analysis/Financial Model Results and Authorizes Conducting a
Neighborhood Meeting on June 30 and Continuing the Preparation of the
Study and Bidding Documents
June 7
5 Continue the Design of Snow Making System using the Final Layout for
the Snow Tubing Area and Cross-Country Ski Trails June 11
6
Send Invitations to Neighborhood Meeting to Affected Nearby Property
Owners / Article Appears on the City Web Page and Newspaper Briefly
Describing the Project Advertising the Meeting
June 16
7 Conduct Neighborhood Meeting at the Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse to
Review 90% Complete Study with Stakeholders June 30
8 Submit 90% Complete Study to City for Review by Park Board July 1
9 Park Board Reviews 90% Complete Study July 12
10 Submit Complete Study to the City July 25
Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016
Page 3
Proposed Production Schedule Key Milestones
No. Description Date
11 Council Considers the Study and Authorizes Advertisement for Bids August 2
12 Advertise for Bids August 11, 18, and
25
13 Open Bids September 1
14 Council Considers Awarding a Construction Contract to a Contractor September 20
15 City Uses Amount of Construction Contract for Budgeting Purposes October -
November
16 Bond Sale to Finance this Project December 2016 /
January 2017
17 Contractor Begins Construction Winter 2017
18 Snow Tubing Area and Cross-Country Ski Trails Relying on Snow Open
for Business December 2017 1
Notes:
1 Weather dependent. If the weather is too warm leading up to December 2017, snow cannot be made.
While we will immediately begin preparing both the study and bidding documents, we must particularly
focus on preparing a market analysis/financial model verifying that it makes financial sense to add winter recreation featuring snow and natural snow to Braemar Park that can be used by all citizens of Edina. We
will present the preliminary findings to the Council at its June 7 meeting. If the Council believes it makes sense, we will continue to use our wealth of experience to guide us as we prepare the study and bidding
documents that will add winter recreation featuring snow and natural snow to Braemar Park within close proximity to private property, the golf course, and public streets shown in Exhibit 1. If it does not make
sense to the Council, we will cease the preparation of both the study and bidding documents.
To achieve a year end bond sale, it is imperative that the City review and then choose a final layout for the snow tubing area and cross-country ski trails from the base and alternate designs for these features
between June 6 and June 10, and no later than June 10, respectively. Otherwise it will be impossible to open bids on September 1. We will hurry to set out in the field no later than June 5 for City use the base
and alternate designs for the snow tubing area and cross-country ski trails. In some areas, we will have to set this information out in the field before or after the 27-hole golf course opens or closes respectively.
We understand our field activities cannot interfere with golf course operations.
Team Description
Since 2002 the SEH team that will execute the work plan described by this Supplemental Letter
Agreement has successfully added winter recreation featuring snow inside metropolitan area parks in Iowa, Illinois, and Minnesota. Successfully adding snow to winter recreation within close proximity to
private property, the golf course, and public streets requires a special blend of winter recreation and municipal project design skills sets not found in the winter recreation design community. It is a lot different
designing winter recreation inside Braemar Park than it is in the wide open spaces of the Soldier Hollow or Vail or Sunday River resorts in Utah, Colorado, and Maine respectively.
Our team for this project not only has this special blend, but it has also completed many municipal
projects for Edina since the mid 1980’s. We understand the Community that is Edina and what it takes to successfully complete projects in Edina. Edina deserves an expert team playing a proactive and pivotal
role helping it make great decisions assuring winter recreation at Braemar Park featuring snow is a successful amenity. Our team has not only provided feasibility study, market analysis/financial model
preparation, public engagement including project meetings, bid document preparation, permitting, bidding assistance, and construction phase services for winter recreation projects; but also specifically for
projects in Edina.
Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016
Page 4
Besides strong winter recreation design and market analysis/financial model preparation bench strength,
a detailed understanding of how nearby private property owners might view the impacts of winter recreation are a must. Our team not only has the required winter recreation design and market
analysis/financial model preparation bench strength, but also a great understanding of how adding winter recreation needing snow in metropolitan areas can impact nearby property owners.
As a case in point, I will lead our team as its project manager. Since 1998 and 2002, I have had the
pleasure of leading the SEH design teams that completed both our Edina municipal and winter recreation featuring snow projects respectively. As project manager, I will combine my unique knowledge of both
winter recreation inside metropolitan areas and what it takes to successfully complete municipal projects for Edina. Besides myself, SEH employees Mike Horn, Ken Taillon, Tom Honer and Deric Deuschle have
all not only completed Edina municipal projects, but also our winter recreation projects needing snow. They all understand how property owners near Braemar Park might view the impacts of winter recreation.
Below are a few key items about these and some of our team members.
1. Mike Horn – SEH - Quality Assurance / Quality Control: Before joining SEH, Mike was a project manager for Three Rivers Park District. Mike managed all of Three Rivers Park District’s projects
either studying or adding winter recreation needing snow to Park District parks. As the Park District’s consulting engineer, Paul worked with Mike on all of those projects. Since joining SEH, and on behalf
of Edina, Mike has been inspecting Edina’s contractor’s work reconstructing both the Driving Range and Executive Golf Course in Braemar Park.
2. Noah Brautigam – Morton Trails – Cross Country Ski Trail Design: Morton Trails helped us ‘trail blaze’ the most challenging portions of the cross country ski trails receiving snow that were added to Three
Rivers Park District’s Hyland Lake Park Reserve. We worked together to assure that the added trail alignments would be both safe and enjoyable to ski. This time Noah will help us ‘trail blaze’ the most
challenging portions of the trails the City might add to Braemar Park. The goal remains assuring a trail design that all of Edina’s property owners and visitors can ski safely and enjoyably.
3. Dave Belin – RRC Associates - Market Analysis / Financial Model Preparation: Prepared an analysis and model for Three Rivers Park District during their study of potential summer time alpine activities
at Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area. As our subconsultant, Dave just completed an analysis and model for a proposed winter recreation area in Sioux City, Iowa.
4. Mark Meadows and Mike Parsons – Torrent Engineering and Equipment and HDR Engineering Respectively - Snowmaking Engineering and Noise Impact Study Preparation Respectively: Were
both SEH subconsultants on Three Rivers Park District projects to reconstruct the snow making system at Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area and add snowmaking to cross country ski trails in Hyland
Lake Park Reserve. Mark was the lead snowmaking engineer for the last two winter Olympic games in Vancouver, Canada and Sochi, Russia. He is currently designing the snowmaking for 2018 Winter
Olympics in South Korea. Additionally, since 2002, Mark has been our subconsultant for all our winter recreation area projects needing snow.
5. Ken Taillon and Tom Honer – SEH – Trail Lighting and Electrical Power Distribution Design: Ken and Tom have provided these services for all our winter recreation area projects. Additionally, Ken has
designed outdoor lighting for the City on numerous occasions as part of our street and utility reconstruction projects.
6. Toby Muse - SEH – Site Civil Engineering: Besides taking over project manager duties from Paul for the last 6 street and utility reconstruction projects completed by SEH for Edina, Toby is managing
Three Rivers Park District’s project to add the 9-Mile Creek Regional Trail to Edina. 7. Deric Deuschle- SEH – Environmental: On behalf of Edina, Deric is providing wetland delineation and
environmental permitting services for the project that will reconstruct the 27-hole golf course to and
18-hole golf course at Braemar Park. He provided these same services during the reconstruction of both the Driving Range and Executive Golf Course in Braemar Park. Fee
Our experience with similar winter recreational projects reveals these specialty engineering services can
cost as much as 21% of the project’s construction cost. Of this 21%, the study and bid document preparation phases alone can cost as much as 5% and 8% respectively. Construction phase services
(construction staking, inspection, and administration) usually require the balance of the 21%.
Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016
Page 5
A very schematic level consideration of this project reveals its total project cost can be between $2,000,000 and $3,000,000. If we assume a construction cost of $2,500,000 our estimated not-to-exceed
fee described by the table below for study and bidding document preparation is 13% of the very schematic level construction budget. This is consistent with our experience for the scope of work required
by this particular specialty project.
Fee Summary Per Work Item
No. Description Estimated Not to
Exceed Fee 1
1 Prepare Study $138,131
2 Prepare Bidding Documents and Provide Bidding Assistance $192,146
Subtotal $330,277
3 Provide Construction Phase Services To Be Determined
Notes:
1 Includes reimbursable expenses including subconsultant fees.
The City will be billed on an hourly basis subject to the not to exceed fee. The hourly billing rates are attached as Exhibit 2. The fees reported in this table are calculated in detail in the attached task hour
budget. We will invoice the City monthly on an hourly basis. Our invoices will include expenses. The City may stop work at any time. If the Council chooses to stop work, we will immediately stop work and you
will only be billed for work that has been completed.
Conclusion
This Supplemental Letter Agreement, Exhibit 1, Task Hour Budget, Exhibit 2, and our Agreement dated
June 4, 2013 represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project.
Our combination of park design professionals, real world snowmaking experience, and market
analysis/financial model preparation expertise will ensure that all of the Edina’s immediate and long-term needs are covered. We sincerely appreciate our continued working relationship with the City. Please
contact me at 952.912.2611 or ppasko@sehinc.com with questions regarding this Supplemental Letter Agreement.
Sincerely,
SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC.
Paul J. Pasko III, PE
Project Manager
Enclosures c: Dave Belin, RRC Associates
Noah Brautigam, Morton Trail Consultants Mark Meadows, Torrent Engineering and Equipment
Mike Parsons, HDR Marty Iozzo, General Corrosion Corporation
Toby Muse, SEH Mike Horn, SEH
Ken Taillon, SEH Tom Honer, SEH
Brent Theroux, SEH Mike Hemstad, SEH
Ann Kattreh May 11, 2016
Page 6
p:\ae\e\edina\136169\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\final\05 11 16 final rev\final sla ltr wra at braemar city rev 05 11 16.docx
Accepted on this ___day of________________, 2016
City of Edina, Minnesota
By:_________________________________
James Hovland, Mayor
_________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager
WINTER RECREATION AREA RELYING
ON NATURAL SNOW
WINTER RECREATION AREA RELYING
ON MACHINE MADE SNOW
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
A
S
K
S
Cl
i
e
n
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ma
n
a
g er
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g in
e
e
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
De
s
i
g
n
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Po
w
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
St
a
f
f
En
g in
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
En
g in
e
e
r
Na
t
u
r
a
l
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin Tech
1.
1
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
&
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Su
m
m
a
r
y
&
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
(
2
)
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
1.
2
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
I
s
s
u
e
s
In
i
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
I
s
s
u
e
s
(
3
)
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
1.
3
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
1.
3
.
1
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
(
4
)
1
42
1.
3
.
2
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
5
)
1
24
1.
3
.
3
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
(
6
)
2
1.
3
.
4
Tr
a
i
l
s
(
7
)
42
1.
3
.
5
Wa
t
e
r
W
e
l
l
a
n
d
P
u
m
p
i
n
g
(
8
)
4
1.
3
.
6
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
(
9
)
4
1.
3
.
7
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
1
0
)
4
1.
3
.
8
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
(
1
1
)
(
1
2
)
1.
3
.
9
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
(
1
3
)
82
1.
3
.
1
0
Re
v
i
e
w
G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
(
3
3
)
42
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
2
4
2
826
8
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$
2
9
6
$
6
9
8
$
2
3
4
$1
,
1
6
0
$
3
,
7
2
3
$
8
3
4
$
6
,
9
4
5
1.
4
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
1.
4
.
1
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
(
1
4
)
42
4
1.
4
.
2
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
1
5
)
82
4
4
2
4
1.
4
.
3
Tr
a
i
l
s
(
1
6
)
(
1
7
)
4
412
4
1.
4
.
4
Tu
b
i
n
g
(
1
9
)
4
1.
4
.
5
Wa
t
e
r
W
e
l
l
a
n
d
P
u
m
p
i
n
g
(
1
8
)
(
5
8
)
2
1.
4
.
6
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
(
2
0
)
24
2
4
2
1.
4
.
7
No
i
s
e
S
t
u
d
y
(
2
1
)
(
2
2
)
1.
4
.
8
Co
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
(
2
3
)
1.
4
.
9
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
2
4
)
1.
4
.
1
0
Li
f
t
O
p
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
1.
4
.
1
1
Fin
a
n
c
i
a
l
(
2
5
)
1.
4
.
1
2
Bo
o
s
t
e
r
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
d
a
n
d
F
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
61
2
1
2
1.
4
.
1
3
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
P
r
e
f
a
b
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
r
24
1.
5
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
s
t
/
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
/
Fe
a
s
i
bi
l
i
t
y
1.
5
.
1
St
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
P
r
o
b
a
b
l
e
C
o
s
t
1.
5
.
1
.
1
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
s
t
4
32
1
2
4
1.
5
.
1
.
2
So
f
t
C
o
s
t
(
2
6
)
21
8
1.
5
.
2
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
1.
5
.
3
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
42
2
1.
5
.
4
A pp
e
n
d
i
x
(
2
7
)
2
12
4
1.
5
.
5
Pa
d
f
o
r
S
n
o
w
m
a
k
e
r
s
(
n
o
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
)
22
1.
5
.
6
Fo
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
H
a
n
d
l
e
-
t
o
w
a
t
T
u
b
i
n
g
H
i
l
l
s
(
3
9
)
81
2
2
0
1.
5
.
7
De
t
a
i
l
s
81
2
1
6
1.
5
.
8
C
o
s
t
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
f
o
r
S
t
u
d
y
24
1.
5
.
9
F
o
o
t
i
n
g
s
f
o
r
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
b
e
h
i
n
d
R
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
W
a
l
l
s
44
1.
5
.
1
0
Q
A
Q
C
16
6
1
6
2
6
3
0
4
2
4
3
8
4
4
1
2
8
$8
8
7
$
3
,
3
4
3
$
4
,
5
3
7
$
3
,
5
0
5
$
5
,
7
2
9
$
7
4
1
$
6
7
3
$
1
,
0
6
5
$
4
,
1
0
6
$
1
,
7
1
8
$
8
3
4
$
2
7
,
1
3
9
1.
6
T
r
a
i
l
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
(
2
8
)
1.
6
.
1
Fi
e
l
d
M
a
r
k
T
r
a
i
l
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
O
p
t
i
o
n
s
(
1
6
)
2
4
2
2
8
1
2
8
2
4
1
2
1
2
2
Ta
s
k
H
o
u
r
B
u
d
g
e
t
Wi
n
t
e
r
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
A
r
e
a
a
t
B
r
a
e
m
a
r
P
a
r
k
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
Ma
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
6
ESTIMATED COST
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
H
O
U
R
S
1.
0
F
e
a
s
i
bi
l
i
t
y
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
)
Pa
g
e
1
o
f
5
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
A
S
K
S
Cl
i
e
n
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ma
n
a
g er
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g in
e
e
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
De
s
i
g
n
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Po
w
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
St
a
f
f
En
g in
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
En
g in
e
e
r
Na
t
u
r
a
l
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
H
O
U
R
S
1.
6
.
2
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
F
i
e
l
d
R
e
v
i
e
w
2
1.
6
.
3
Fie
l
d
R
e
v
i
e
w
8
1.
6
.
4
Fin
a
l
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
(
6
9
)
82
24
2
2
8
1 21 63 61 2
1
2
2
$2
9
6
$
8
3
6
$
3
4
9
$
2
3
4
$1
,
4
8
2
$1,120
$
2
,
1
1
2
$
5
,
1
5
5
$
1
,
2
4
8
$
1
,
1
1
4
$
2
0
9
$
1
4
,
1
5
4
1.
7
Pu
b
l
i
c
I
n
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
(
7
0
)
1.
7
.
1
Pu
b
l
i
c
R
e
v
i
e
w
4
20
1.
7
.
2
Co
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
4
42
1.
7
.
3
Su
b
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
A
t
t
e
n
d
a
n
c
e
(
7
1
)
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
8
422
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$1
,
6
7
2
$528
$
3
,
1
5
1
$5,350
2.
1
Da
t
a
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
2.
1
.
1
A rc
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
(
2
9
)
(
3
0
)
2.
1
.
2
Civ
i
l
(
3
1
)
81
6
24
2
0
2.
1
.
3
To
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
S
u
r
v
e
y
(
3
2
)
(
6
3
)
856
5
6
2.
1
.
4
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
(
3
3
)
(
65
)
(
6
6
)
(
6
7
)
(
6
8
)
80
2.
1
.
5
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
P
o
w
e
r
(
3
4
)
24
2.
1
.
6
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
(
3
5
)
44
2.
1
.
7
Me
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
(
3
6
)
2.
1
.
8
Co
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
S
t
u
d
y
(
3
7
)
2
2.
1
.
9
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
(
3
8
)
2.
1
.
1
0
No
i
s
e
S
t
u
d
y
(
4
0
)
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
8
1
6
4
2
8
8
2
2
4
2
8
5
6
5
6
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$
1
,
1
8
2
$
3
,
3
4
3
$
7
4
1
$
4
4
8
$
1
,
0
6
5
$
1
2
,
7
7
0
$
2
,
2
4
0
$
4
,
0
1
0
$
5
,
8
2
3
$
5
,
1
9
8
$
3
6
,
8
2
0
2.
2
Pl
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
2.
2
.
1
Tit
l
e
S
h
e
e
t
S
i
g
n
a
t
u
r
e
s
2.
2
.
2
Si
t
e
P
l
a
n
P
u
m
p
H
o
u
s
e
A
r
e
a
(
4
1
)
12
2.
2
.
3
Civ
i
l
(
4
2
)
(
4
3
)
(
4
4
)
(
4
5
)
(
4
6
)
(
6
4
)
41
2
20
1
4
0
1
2
2.
2
.
4
Si
t
e
&
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
(
4
7
)
40
2
4
2.
2
.
5
Er
o
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
P
l
a
n
(
4
8
)
88
2.
2
.
6
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
P
o
w
e
r
(
4
9
)
82
0
2.
2
.
7
Co
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
(
5
0
)
2.
2
.
8
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
(
5
1
)
24
2
2
0
2
2.
2
.
9
Me
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
(
5
2
)
(
5
9
)
2.
2
.
1
0
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
(
5
3
)
24
4
2.
2
.
1
1
Re
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
W
a
l
l
(
6
4
)
86
4
8
1
2
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
4
1
2
1
0
6
8
2
4
1
0
4
0
3
4
8
1
8
8
6
0
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$
5
9
1
$
2
,
5
0
7
$
1
,
7
4
5
$
7
0
1
$
1
,
0
9
1
$
4
,
4
4
7
$
2
,
2
4
2
$
5
,
3
2
7
$
5
,
2
9
5
$
1
,
1
6
0
$
1
7
,
5
4
6
$
8
,
5
9
2
$
5
1
,
2
4
4
2.
3
Me
e
t
i
n
g
s
Me
e
t
i
n
g
s
(
5
4
)
33
3
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
33
3
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$5
5
6
$
6
7
3
$
3
9
9
$1,628
2.
4
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
u
a
l
2.
3
.
1
Fr
o
n
t
E
n
d
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
(
5
5
)
2
12
4
2.
3
.
2
Bi
d
d
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
5
6
)
2
12
2
2.
3
.
3
Sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
)
28
1
0
84
2.
3
.
4
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
P
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
(
6
4
)
88
24
1
2
2.
3
.
5
Pu
m
p
S
k
i
d
(
5
9
)
8
2.
3
.
6
A pp
e
n
d
i
x
(
5
7
)
2
24
2
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
1
6
8
8
1
8
80
2
4
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$
2
,
3
6
4
$
1
,
3
9
6
$
1
,
4
8
2
$
4
,
0
3
6
$
1
1
,
4
5
6
$
2
,
5
0
3
$
2
3
,
2
3
8
2.
5
Op
i
n
i
o
n
o
f
P
r
o
b
a
b
l
e
C
o
s
t
2.
4
.
1
Co
s
t
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
2
4
2
1
8
4
3
2
1
6
2
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
2
4
2
1
8
4
3
2
1
6
2
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$
2
9
6
$
8
3
6
$
3
7
1
$
2
2
4
$
1
,
0
6
5
$
6
2
3
$
2
,
9
8
7
$
2
,
2
9
1
$
2
0
9
$
8
,
9
0
1
2.
0
B
i
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
g
e
2
o
f
5
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
A
S
K
S
Cl
i
e
n
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ma
n
a
g er
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g in
e
e
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
De
s
i
g
n
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Po
w
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
St
a
f
f
En
g in
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
En
g in
e
e
r
Na
t
u
r
a
l
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
H
O
U
R
S
3.
1
Bi
d
d
i
n
g
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
3.
1
.
1
A d
f
o
r
B
i
d
s
3.
1
.
1
.
1
No
t
i
c
e
o
f
H
e
a
r
i
n
g a
n
d
L
e
t
t
i
n
g
2
3.
1
.
1
.
2
No
t
i
c
e
t
o
B
i
d
d
e
r
s
2
3.
1
.
1
.
3
El
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
P
l
a
n
R
o
o
m
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
2
3.
1
.
2
Ag
en
c
y R
e
v
i
e
w
3.
1
.
2
.
1
Wa
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
P
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
2
3.
1
.
3
Re
s
p on
s
e
t
o
B
i
d
d
e
r
s
3.
1
.
3
.
1
Si
t
e
C
i
v
i
l
88
3.
1
.
3
.
2
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
24
3.
1
.
3
.
3
Li
g ht
i
n
g
84
3.
1
.
3
.
4
Me
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
(59
)
3.
1
.
3
.
5
Dis
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
P
i
p in
g (59
)
3.
1
.
3
.
6
Pu
m
p H
o
u
s
e
3.
1
.
4
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
2
3.
1
.
5
A dd
e
n
d
u
m
s
8
3.
1
.
6
Bi
d
O
p en
i
n
g
3.
1
.
5
.
1
Pr
e
p ar
e
T
a
b
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
B
i
d
s
4
3.
1
.
5
.
2
Pr
e
p ar
e
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
w
a
r
d
2
3.
2
QA
Q
C
1
2
2
4
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
1
2
2
4
8
2
8
1
0
2
1
6
1
2
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$
1
,
7
7
3
$
5
,
0
1
5
$
1
,
4
8
2
$
4
4
8
$
1
,
0
6
5
$
1
,
5
5
7
$
2
9
0
$
1
,
4
9
3
$
1
,
2
5
2
$
1
4
,
3
7
6
Cl
i
e
n
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ma
n
a
g er
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g in
e
e
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
De
s
i
g
n
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Po
w
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
St
a
f
f
En
g in
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
En
g in
e
e
r
Na
t
u
r
a
l
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
14
2
8
4
0
5
0
5
4
3
6
1
3
5
6
8
6
8
2
0
1
1
8
1
2
1
2
3
0
559
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$2
,
0
6
9
$
5
,
8
5
1
$
6
,
9
8
0
$
5
,
8
4
1
$
7
,
3
6
6
$
6
,
6
7
0
$
2
,
9
1
5
$
7
,
4
5
7
$
1
,
1
6
0
$
6
,
3
4
6
$
2
,
6
4
0
$
1
6
,
8
9
8
$
1
,
2
4
8
$
1
,
1
1
4
$
3
,
1
2
9
$77,694.00
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
E
x
p en
s
e
s
$1,685.00
RR
C
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
(62
)
$19,332.00
To
r
r
e
n
t
E
n
g in
e
e
r
i
n
g (58
) (61
)
$9,720.00
HD
R
$16,200.00
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
$2,700.00
Mo
r
t
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
s
$10,800.00
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$138,131.00
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
30
3
2
1
8
6
8
4
1
3
4
5
9
1
2
0
8
2
4
4
1
8
4
5
6
5
6
2
6
922
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$4
,
4
3
3
$
6
,
6
8
6
$
3
,
1
4
1
$
7
0
1
$
1
,
0
9
1
$
7
,
5
9
7
$
7
,
6
2
3
$
7
,
8
5
7
$
1
8
,
6
8
7
$
1
,
1
6
0
$
2
2
,
7
7
2
$
2
6
,
3
5
0
$
5
,
8
2
3
$
5
,
1
9
8
$
2
,
7
1
2
121,831.00
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
E
x
p en
s
e
s
$500.00
So
i
l
B
o
r
i
n
g s
B
r
a
u
n
I
n
t
e
r
t
e
c
$14,040.00
HD
R
$4,320.00
To
r
r
e
n
t
E
n
g in
e
e
r
i
n
g (59
)
$23,760.00
Mo
r
t
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
s
$8,800.00
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$173,251.00
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
H
o
u
r
s
12
2
4
8
2
8
1
0
2
1
6
1
2
94
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
L
a
b
o
r
C
o
s
t
$1
,
7
7
3
$
5
,
0
1
5
$
1
,
4
8
2
$
4
4
8
$
1
,
0
6
5
$
1
,
5
5
7
$
2
9
0
$
1
,
4
9
3
$
1
,
2
5
2
$14,375.00
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
E
x
p en
s
e
s
$200.00
To
r
r
e
n
t
E
n
g in
e
e
r
i
n
g (60
)
$4,320.00
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$18,895.00 $330,277.00
3.
0
B
i
d
d
i
n
g
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
TO
T
A
L
C
O
S
T
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D
W
I
T
H
T
H
I
S
P
R
O
P
O
S
A
L
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
C
O
S
T
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
3.
0
B
i
d
d
i
n
g
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
1.
0
F
e
a
s
i
bi
l
i
t
y
S
t
u
d
y
(
1
)
2.
0
B
i
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
g
e
3
o
f
5
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
A
S
K
S
Cl
i
e
n
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ma
n
a
g er
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g in
e
e
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
De
s
i
g
n
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Po
w
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
St
a
f
f
En
g in
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
En
g in
e
e
r
Na
t
u
r
a
l
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
H
O
U
R
S
P:
\
A
E
\
E
\
E
d
i
n
a
\
1
3
6
1
6
9
\
1
-
g
e
n
l
\
1
0
-
s
e
t
up
-
c
o
n
t
\
0
3
-
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
\
[
0
5
0
6
1
6
B
r
m
r
T
H
B
-
.
x
l
s
x
]
H
o
u
r
s
-
C
o
s
t
s
(1
)
(2
)
(3
)
(4
)
(5
)
(6 )
(7
)
(8 )
(9 )
(10
)
(11
)
(1
2
)
(13
)
(14
)
(15
)
(16
)
(17
)
(18
)
(1
9
)
(2
0
)
(21
)
(2
2
)
(23
)
(24
)
(25
)
(26
)
(27
)
(28
)
(29
)
(30
)
(31
)
(3
2
)
(33
)
(3
4
)
(35
)
(36
)
(37
)
(38
)
(39
)
(40
)
(41
)
(42
)
(43
)
(44
)
(45
)
(46
)
(47
)
(48
)
(49
)
(50
)
(51
)
(52
)
(53
)
(54
)
(55
)
(56
)
(5
7
)
(5
8
)
(5
9
)
(6
0
)
Fo
r
i
t
e
m
s
i
n
1
.
0
a
n
d
2
.
0
a
b
o
v
e
.
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
p
l
a
t
e
s
,
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
,
s
o
i
l
b
o
r
i
n
g
s
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Fe
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
I
t
e
m
s
a
s
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
t
o
T
o
r
r
en
t
e
x
p
e
r
t
i
s
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
n
o
w
m
a
k
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
s
y
s
t
e
m
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
&
s
n
o
w
m
a
k
i
n
g
e
q
u
i
p
m
en
t
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
&
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
pr
o
c
e
s
s
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
p
i
p
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
Po
w
e
r
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Wa
t
e
r
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
a
n
d
c
o
o
l
i
n
g
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
Bi
d
D
o
c
s
P
r
e
p
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
p
i
p
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
em
m
e
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
,
b
i
d
d
o
c
s
Bi
d
d
i
n
g
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
,
f
o
r
i
t
e
m
s
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
p
i
p
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
Lif
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
f
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
t
o
s
t
u
d
y
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
o
i
l
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
a
n
d
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
f
o
r
S
n
o
w
m
a
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
G
r
o
m
i
n
g
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ci
v
i
l
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
b
a
s
e
m
a
p
p
i
n
g
,
a
e
r
i
a
l
im
a
g
i
n
g
,
t
o
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
m
a
p
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
i
t
e
p
h
o
t
o
s
Su
r
v
e
y
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
1
.
G
o
p
h
e
r
S
t
a
t
e
O
n
e
C
a
l
l
f
o
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
l
o
c
a
t
e
,
2
.
T
o
p
o
i
n
k
e
y
a
r
e
a
s
,
3
.
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
t
r
e
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
4
.
F
i
e
l
d
s
t
ak
i
n
g
o
f
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
,
5
.
S
o
i
l
B
o
r
i
n
g
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
s
o
i
l
b
o
r
i
n
g
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
(
u
p
t
o
14
b
o
r
i
n
g
s
)
,
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
t
e
ch
n
i
c
a
l
m
e
m
o
r
a
n
d
u
m
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
z
i
n
g
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
io
n
,
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
s
t
u
d
y
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
s
e
t
u
p
d
a
t
a
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
f
i
e
l
d
Ba
s
i
c
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
a
n
d
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
i
r
u
s
e
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
r
e
p
o
r
t
o
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
o
i
l
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
s
u
r
v
e
y
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
Th
e
f
o
r
m
a
t
w
i
l
l
f
o
l
l
o
w
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
f
o
r
m
a
t
f
o
r
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
S
t
u
d
y
.
1.
T
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
a
r
k
u
s
e
,
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
bu
f
f
e
r
s
,
2
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
i
m
i
t
s
,
3
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
ar
e
a
w
i
t
h
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
C
l
u
b
H
o
u
s
e
a
nd
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
RR
C
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
w
i
l
l
h
i
r
e
d
a
s
a
s
u
b
-
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
t
o
S
E
H
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
i
s
w
o
r
k
Ci
t
y
t
o
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
g
o
l
f
c
o
u
r
s
e
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
i
f
a
n
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
a
r
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
W
R
A
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
I
P
o
r
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
i
n
fo
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
.
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
C
l
u
b
H
o
u
s
e
Ci
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
l
i
s
t
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
g
l
e
v
e
l
s
a
n
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
f
o
r
S
n
o
w
m
a
k
i
n
g
Ci
t
y
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
e
x
pe
n
s
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
s
t
u
d
y
.
Bi
d
d
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
;
B
i
d
F
o
r
m
,
I
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
on
s
T
o
B
i
d
d
e
r
s
,
A
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
B
i
d
s
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
i
t
e
,
t
r
a
i
l
,
p
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
,
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
c
a
b
i
n
e
t
,
t
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
e
r
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
.
Me
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
f
o
r
c
e
m
a
i
n
,
p
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
p
l
a
n
,
s
n
o
w
m
a
k
i
n
g
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
e
-
o
r
d
e
r
.
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
a
n
d
n
e
w
p
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
,
R
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
l
i
f
t
i
f
r
e
q
u
i
r
ed
.
Me
e
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
;
1
.
O
n
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
a
t
5
0
%
b
i
d
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
,
O
n
e
a
t
9
0
%
b
i
d
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
,
U
p
t
o
o
n
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
.
Fr
o
n
t
E
n
d
:
T
i
t
l
e
S
h
e
e
t
,
C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
h
e
e
t
,
T
a
b
l
e
o
f
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
Si
t
e
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
;
P
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
,
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
l
an
,
r
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
T
u
r
f
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
,
p
r
u
n
i
n
g
d
e
t
ai
l
s
Ci
v
i
l
;
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
s
,
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
G
r
u
b
b
i
n
g
,
T
r
e
e
R
e
m
o
v
a
l
Pl
a
n
,
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
a
g
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
,
a
n
d
A
c
c
e
s
s
r
o
u
t
e
p
l
a
n
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
f
i
n
a
l
t
r
a
i
l
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
,
t
o
b
e
s
t
a
k
e
d
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
c
i
t
y
.
Tu
b
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
t
o
b
e
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
n
o
t
e
s
2
8
a
n
d
2
9
o
n
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
G
o
l
f
e
r
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
P
l
a
n
i
f
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
t
i
o
n
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
i
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
g
o
l
f
s
e
a
s
o
n
.
A
d
e
t
a
i
l
o
f
c
a
t
h
o
d
i
c
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
i
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
b
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
Er
o
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
P
l
a
n
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
P
r
e
v
e
nt
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
S
W
P
P
P
)
.
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
P
o
w
e
r
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
m
a
i
n
p
o
w
e
r
n
e
e
d
s
,
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
e
x
c
e
l
,
p
u
m
p
s
k
i
d
p
o
w
e
r
n
e
e
d
s
,
p
o
w
e
r
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
p
u
m
p
i
n
g
,
p
o
w
e
r
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
s
n
o
w
m
a
k
i
n
g
.
No
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
o
r
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
pl
a
n
i
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
(
i
f
ne
e
d
e
d
)
a
n
d
n
e
w
p
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
p
l
a
n
s
,
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
.
Re
v
i
e
w
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
c
o
o
r
di
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
X
c
e
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
,
c
o
or
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
,
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
3
-
p
h
a
s
e
p
o
w
e
r
s
o
u
r
c
e
.
Re
v
i
e
w
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
i
g
h
t
c
o
d
e
f
o
r
c
i
t
y
,
h
o
u
r
s
o
f
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
o
f
l
i
g
h
t
s
p
i
l
l
a
r
e
a
.
SE
H
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
L
I
D
A
R
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
i
f
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
H
D
R
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
;
1
.
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
l
i
m
i
t
s
a
n
d
,
2
.
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
on
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
l
u
b
H
o
u
s
e
a
n
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
A
r
e
a
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
;
1
.
a
n
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
o
p
u
b
l
i
c
o
r
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
2
.
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
o
w
e
r
u
s
e
,
3
.
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
ir
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
Ci
t
y
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
p
y
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
pe
r
m
i
t
s
t
a
t
u
s
,
p
e
r
m
i
t
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
i
e
s
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
,
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
i
e
s
u
s
e
d
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
.
As
s
u
m
e
s
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
be
i
m
p
a
c
t
ed
,
t
h
u
s
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
n
o
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
t
u
d
y
e
f
f
o
r
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
.
1
.
T
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
k
n
o
w
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
2
.
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
p
o
w
e
r
,
a
n
d
u
s
e
,
3
.
P
r
iv
a
t
e
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
u
se
,
4
.
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
I
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
a
s
b
u
i
l
t
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
C
i
t
y
.
Su
r
v
e
y
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
i
n
g
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
s
-
b
u
ilt
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
h
o
u
s
e
RR
C
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
r
oj
e
c
t
e
d
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
.
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
c
ie
s
,
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
f
e
e
s
,
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
c
o
s
t
s
.
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
;
1
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
,
2
.
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
io
n
,
3
.
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
S
i
t
e
P
l
a
n
,
4
.
N
e
w
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
P
l
a
n
,
5
.
Tr
a
i
l
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
D
e
s
g
i
n
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
t
o
b
e
m
a
d
e
b
y
S
E
H
,
M
o
r
t
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
S
t
a
f
f
.
To
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
;
1
.
t
r
a
i
l
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
,
2
.
P
h
o
t
o
m
e
t
r
i
c
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
,
3
.
a
n
y
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
ng
c
o
u
r
s
e
o
r
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
c
l
u
b
h
o
u
se
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
4
.
a
n
y
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
.
Tu
b
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
t
u
d
y
t
o
b
e
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
n
o
t
e
s
2
8
a
n
d
2
9
o
n
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
Sc
o
p
e
-
N
o
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
w
o
r
k
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
.
P
u
m
p
H
o
u
s
e
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
T
o
r
r
e
n
t
.
SE
H
w
i
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
m
a
r
k
a
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
A
r
e
a
A
w
i
t
h
u
p
t
o
t
w
o
a
l
t
e
r
m
a
t
i
v
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
a
s
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
a
r
e
a
a
s
n
o
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
O
n
e
,
a
n
d
a
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
i
n
A
r
e
a
B
w
i
t
h
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
u
p
t
o
2
5
%
o
f
t
h
e
t
o
t
a
l
l
e
n
g
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
a
s
n
o
t
e
d
o
n
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
O
n
e
.
HD
R
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
o
f
n
o
i
s
e
d
a
t
a
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
g
r
ap
h
i
c
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
n
o
i
s
e
s
p
i
l
l
l
e
v
e
l
s
.
Tr
a
i
l
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
n
o
n
-
s
n
o
w
m
a
kin
g
t
r
a
i
l
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
t
h
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
t
i
y
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
To
r
r
e
n
t
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
;
1
.
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
o
w
e
r
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
p
u
m
p
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
,
2
.
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
p
e
r
mi
t
,
3
.
W
a
t
e
r
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
s
no
w
m
a
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
/
c
o
s
t
s
,
4
.
s
n
o
w
m
a
k
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
a
y
o
u
t
,
5
.
R
a
d
o
n
i
n
w
a
t
e
r
,
w
e
w
i
l
l
n
e
e
d
h
e
l
p
/
i
n
p
u
t
f
r
o
m
S
E
H
o
n
t
h
i
s
.
Pa
g
e
4
o
f
5
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
A
S
K
S
Cl
i
e
n
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ma
n
a
g er
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g in
e
e
r
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
De
s
i
g
n
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
-
Po
w
e
r
El
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
St
a
f
f
En
g in
e
e
r
Se
n
i
o
r
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
En
g in
e
e
r
Na
t
u
r
a
l
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Project Engineer GIS Landscape ArchitectSurvey Crew ChiefSurvey Instrument O p eratorAdmin TechESTIMATED COST
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
D
H
O
U
R
S
(6
1
)
(6
2
)
(6
3
)
(6
4
)
(6
5
)
(6
6
)
(6
7
)
(6
8
)
(69
)
(7
0
)
(71
)
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
c
o
s
t
f
o
r
1
s
i
t
e
v
i
s
i
t
.
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
i
z
e
/
d
e
p
t
h
o
f
m
a
r
k
e
t
,
c
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
iv
e
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
,
a
n
d
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
m
o
d
e
l
i
ng
(
t
i
c
k
e
t
a
n
o
t
h
e
r
r
e
v
e
n
e
u
e
s
,
o
p
er
a
t
i
n
g
e
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
)
.
F
o
r
N
o
r
d
i
c
o
n
l
y
=
$
9
,
4
0
0
,
f
o
r
N
o
r
d
i
c
a
n
d
T
u
b
i
ng
=
$
1
2
,
9
0
0
.
T
h
i
s
a
l
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
t
r
i
p
t
o
M
N
f
o
r
a
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
.
As
s
u
m
e
s
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
s
;
up
t
o
2
m
o
d
u
l
a
r
b
l
o
c
k
r
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
s
,
b
o
o
s
t
e
r
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
,
l
i
g
h
t
p
o
l
e
f
o
u
n
d
a
ti
o
n
s
,
t
o
w
m
a
c
h
i
n
e
r
y
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
p
i
pe
s
u
b
g
r
a
d
e
/
b
e
d
d
i
n
g
,
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
e
a
r
t
h
w
o
r
k
.
As
s
u
m
e
s
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
a
i
r
d
a
m
a
g
e
t
o
t
h
e
g
o
l
f
co
u
r
s
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
s
o
i
l
b
o
r
i
n
g
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
.
Th
e
P
a
r
k
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
s
t
h
a
t
n
o
i
s
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
h
i
g
h
e
r
a
t
t
h
e
g
o
l
f
c
o
u
r
s
e
o
n
t
h
e
d
a
y
s
w
e
a
r
e
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
o
i
l
b
o
r
i
n
g
in
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
P
a
r
k
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
d
i
s
r
u
p
t
i
v
e
n
o
i
s
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
a
n
d
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
activity to golf course users.
Fi
n
a
l
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
t
o
b
e
d
e
c
i
d
e
d
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
c
o
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
f
i
e
l
d
v
i
si
t
a
n
d
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
l
y
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
f
o
r
a
s
i
g
n
-
o
f
f
f
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
m
o
v
e
f
o
r
w
a
r
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
S
E
H
t
e
a
m
t
o
s
t
a
r
t
p
i
p
i
n
g
,
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
,
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
s
.
Su
b
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
a
t
t
e
n
d
a
c
e
f
o
r
o
n
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
n
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
i
f
n
e
e
d
e
d
f
o
r
T
o
r
r
e
n
t
,
R
R
C
,
H
D
R
,
a
n
d
M
o
r
t
o
n
T
r
a
i
l
s
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
u
p
t
o
2
m
o
d
u
l
a
r
b
l
o
c
k
r
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
s
.
Di
v
i
d
e
s
i
t
e
i
n
t
o
5
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
c
on
c
e
r
n
.
A
l
l
s
u
r
v
e
y
w
o
r
k
w
i
l
l
ne
e
d
t
o
b
e
d
o
n
e
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
T
o
t
a
l
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
a
2
m
a
n
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
E
s
t
i
m
at
e
d
2
6
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
P
o
i
n
t
s
,
b
u
t
m
o
s
t
l
i
k
e
l
y
w
i
l
l
n
e
e
d
m
o
r
e
i
n
d
e
n
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
A
s
s
u
m
i
n
g
b
o
r
i
n
g
s
,
c
e
n
t
e
r
line alignment stakes and topo c an be done with each trip. Additional time will be
ad
d
e
d
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
o
n
w
h
a
t
'
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
t
r
e
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
r
r
i
do
r
.
A
c
e
n
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
s
h
o
t
,
1
5
f
t
a
n
d
3
0
f
t
l
e
f
t
a
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
f
o
r
60
f
t
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
f
o
r
t
o
p
o
l
i
m
i
t
s
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
n
y
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
g
r
a
d
e
b
r
ea
k
s
i
n
s
i
d
e
t
h
a
t
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
.
S
u
r
v
e
y
o
r
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
D
XF map showing the corridor li mits and centerline alignment
fo
r
s
t
a
k
i
n
g
.
S
u
r
v
e
y
o
r
s
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
.
c
s
v
f
i
l
e
f
o
r
s
t
a
k
i
n
g
b
o
r
i
n
g
s
.
SE
H
t
o
a
t
t
e
n
d
u
p
t
o
:
1
.
O
n
e
P
a
r
k
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
2
:
O
n
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
3
.
T
w
o
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
s
t
a
f
f
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
,
4
C
i
t
y
t
o
r
e
s
e
rv
e
a
n
d
h
o
l
d
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
a
t
B
r
a
e
m
a
r
Cl
u
b
H
o
u
s
e
,
5
.
C
i
t
y
t
o
s
e
n
d
o
u
t
i
n
v
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
to public meetings, distribute, collect and publis h public comments.
So
i
l
b
o
r
i
n
g
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
e
d
b
y
B
r
a
u
n
I
n
t
e
r
t
e
c
us
i
n
g
a
r
u
b
b
e
r
t
r
a
c
k
e
d
g
e
o
p
r
o
b
e
r
i
g.
A
s
s
u
m
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
o
r
i
n
g
l
o
c
a
ti
o
n
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
B
r
a
u
n
,
S
E
H
s
t
a
f
f
,
a
n
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
l
o
c
a
t
o
r
s
.
B
r
a
u
n
d
r
i
l
l
c
r
e
w
w
i
l
l
a
t
t
e
m
p
t
t
o
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
a
n
y
r
u
t
t
i
n
g
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
d
a
m
a
g
e
t
o
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
l
a
w
n
s
;
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
B
r
a
u
n
an
d
S
E
H
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
ne
e
d
e
d
a
s
a
r
e
s
u
l
t
o
f
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Pa
g
e
5
o
f
5
Exhibit 2
SEH Hourly Billable Rates – Winter Recreation Area at Braemar Park
Classification - Office Staff Billable Rate
Client Service Manager $147.76
Project Manager $208.95
Senior Structural Engineer $174.51
Structural Engineer $116.83
Senior Designer $136.40
Electrical Engineer - Lighting $185.28
Electrical Engineer - Power $224.22
Electrical Staff Engineer $133.16
Senior Geotech Engineer $155.73
Natural Resources Scientist $145.05
Project Engineer $93.33
Project GIS Analyst $131.99
Landscape Architect $143.21
Administrative Technician $104.31
Classification – Field Staff Billable Rate
Survey Crew Chief $103.97
Survey Instrument Operator $92.83
Page 1
The CITY of EDINA
Winter Recreation at Braemar Park
City Council Meeting June 21, 2016
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 2
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 3
The CITY of EDINA
•25’ of vertical
drop
•6 lanes
•28% for 80’ of
run
•300’ runout
•Handle tow along
left side
North Tubing Hill
www.EdinaMN.gov 4
The CITY of EDINA
•25’ of vertical
•5 lanes
•11’ wide @
•9% for 150’ of run
•300’ runout
•Handle tow along
right side
Northwest Tubing Hill
www.EdinaMN.gov 5
The CITY of EDINA Snow Tubing
www.EdinaMN.gov 6
11’ Lane Handle Tow
The CITY of EDINA •Beginner (green) – 0.8
km
•Intermediate (blue) –
1.45 km
•Expert – 0.75 km
•Total Length – 3.0 km
XC - Primary Alignment
www.EdinaMN.gov 7
The CITY of EDINA Beginner – 0.8 km
www.EdinaMN.gov 8
5% Slope 10% Slope 8% Slope
The CITY of EDINA Intermediate – 1.45 km
www.EdinaMN.gov 9
13% Slope - Straight 13% Slope - Curved
The CITY of EDINA Expert – 0.75 km
www.EdinaMN.gov 10
15% Slope
17% Slope
17% Slope
The CITY of EDINA Expected Trail Side Equipment
www.EdinaMN.gov 11
Lighting &
Snowmaking Water
& Electrical
Snowmaking Water
& Power - Detail
Pipe Corrosion
Protection
The CITY of EDINA Snowmaking Operation
www.EdinaMN.gov 12
The CITY of EDINA Snowmaking Operation
www.EdinaMN.gov 13
The CITY of EDINA
•weave back and
forth across
cleared openings
of XC trail
Non–Winter: Single Track
Mountain Biking
www.EdinaMN.gov 14
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 15
The CITY of EDINA
•Dedicated Single
Track with snow
making– adjacent
to beginner XC
skiing
•Special Events –
groom all XC
trails w/ machine
made snow
Winter: Fat Tire Biking
www.EdinaMN.gov 16
The CITY of EDINA Why Open During 2017?
www.EdinaMN.gov 17
•Concurrent construction with golf course – easier to make
adjustments at border between projects
•Avoid impacts to north edge of proposed golf hole No. 10 –
pump house / pipe installation
•Use steel pipe & copper / aluminum electrical cable – volatile
costs
•Access winter recreation project thru golf course project -
restore access with golf course project
The CITY of EDINA Why Open During 2017?
www.EdinaMN.gov 18
•use likely golf course
construction access – black
line & blue arrows……
•to access winter recreation
project at multiple points –
yellow arrows……
•to avoid access to winter
recreation project from Gleason
Road - red arrows
The CITY of EDINA
Why so Expensive to
Construct?
www.EdinaMN.gov 19
The CITY of EDINA Why so Expensive to
Construct?
www.EdinaMN.gov 20
The CITY of EDINA Why so Expensive to
Construct?
www.EdinaMN.gov 21
The CITY of EDINA Why so Expensive to
Construct?
www.EdinaMN.gov 22
The CITY of EDINA
Preliminary Market Analysis/
Financial Model Inputs
www.EdinaMN.gov 23
•Two scenarios each – Tubing & XC Skiing / Only XC Skiing
•Short season: 70 days (10 weeks, opening December 20 and closing
March 1)
•Long season: 84 days (12 weeks, opening December 20 and closing
March 15)
•Pricing
•$9 for Nordic day ticket, $75 for Nordic season pass
•$12 for Tubing (2-hour session)
•Cost savings for Labor, Insurance, Property Taxes, General &
Administrative expenses
•No Food & Beverage revenue or expense in current financial model
The CITY of EDINA
Snow Tubing & XC Skiing - Preliminary Market
Analysis/
Financial Model
www.EdinaMN.gov 24
Short Season: 70 Days
SUMMARY - SHORT SEASON 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Nordic Revenue $50,438 $54,073 $58,602 $62,597 $64,035
Tubing Revenue $69,240 $72,031 $74,802 $77,550 $80,272
Total Revenue $119,678 $126,104 $133,403 $140,147 $144,306
Operating Expenses $119,430 $121,819 $124,864 $127,362 $130,546
Operating Cash Flow $247 $4,284 $8,539 $12,785 $13,761
Operating Margin 0.2%3.4%6.4%9.1%9.5%
Depreciation $18,576 $18,948 $18,948 $19,326 $19,326
Net Cash Flow -$18,329 -$14,663 -$10,409 -$6,541 -$5,566
Net Cash Flow Margin -15.3%-11.6%-7.8%-4.7%-3.9%
The CITY of EDINA
Snow Tubing & XC Skiing - Preliminary Market
Analysis/
Financial Model
www.EdinaMN.gov 25
Long Season: 84 Days
SUMMARY - LONG SEASON 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Nordic Revenue $57,495 $61,386 $66,331 $70,616 $72,356
Tubing Revenue $81,480 $84,801 $88,099 $91,372 $94,616
Total Revenue $138,975 $146,187 $154,430 $161,988 $166,972
Operating Expenses $134,359 $137,046 $140,473 $143,282 $146,864
Operating Cash Flow $4,616 $9,141 $13,958 $18,706 $20,108
Operating Margin 3.3%6.3%9.0%11.5%12.0%
Depreciation $18,576 $18,948 $18,948 $19,326 $19,326
Net Cash Flow -$13,960 -$9,807 -$4,990 -$620 $782
Net Cash Flow Margin -10.0%-6.7%-3.2%-0.4%0.5%
The CITY of EDINA
Only XC Skiing - Preliminary Market Analysis/
Financial Model
www.EdinaMN.gov 26
Short Season: 70 Days
SUMMARY - SHORT SEASON
NORDIC ONLY 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Nordic Revenue $50,438 $54,073 $58,602 $62,597 $64,035
Total Revenue $50,438 $54,073 $58,602 $62,597 $64,035
Operating Expenses $60,947 $62,166 $63,720 $64,995 $66,620
Operating Cash Flow -$10,510 -$8,094 -$5,119 -$2,398 -$2,585
Operating Margin -8.8%-6.4%-3.8%-1.7%-1.8%
Depreciation $13,932 $14,211 $14,211 $14,495 $14,495
Net Cash Flow -$24,442 -$22,304 -$19,330 -$16,893 -$17,080
Net Cash Flow Margin -48.5%-41.2%-33.0%-27.0%-26.7%
The CITY of EDINA
Only XC Skiing - Preliminary Market Analysis/
Financial Model
www.EdinaMN.gov 27
Long Season: 84 Days
SUMMARY - LONG SEASON
NORDIC ONLY 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Nordic Revenue $57,495 $61,386 $66,331 $70,616 $72,356
Total Revenue $57,495 $61,386 $66,331 $70,616 $72,356
Operating Expenses $66,400 $67,728 $69,422 $70,810 $72,580
Operating Cash Flow -$8,905 -$6,342 -$3,091 -$194 -$224
Operating Margin -6.4%-4.3%-2.0%-0.1%-0.1%
Depreciation $13,932 $14,211 $14,211 $14,495 $14,495
Net Cash Flow -$22,837 -$20,553 -$17,301 -$14,689 -$14,719
Net Cash Flow Margin -39.7%-33.5%-26.1%-20.8%-20.3%
The CITY of EDINA Preliminary Market Analysis/
Financial Model Budgeting
•For Tubing and Nordic scenarios, both long and short
seasons are operationally cash flow positive
•For Nordic-only scenarios, both long and short seasons are cash flow
negative
•RRC Pro Forma Utilizes 40% of staffing from Braemar, along with support for
marketing, general & administrative, and insurance
- $50,000 in operational support from golf enterprise ($30,000 in
Nordic-only scenarios)
www.EdinaMN.gov 28
The CITY of EDINA
Questions?
www.EdinaMN.gov 29
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 30
The CITY of EDINA Proposed Production Schedule
Key Milestones
www.EdinaMN.gov 31
Description Date
Park Department Chooses the Final Layout for Snow Tubing Area and Cross-Country Ski Trails (relying on both snow and
natural snow) from the Base and Alternate Designs for the
Snow Tubing and Cross-Country Ski Trails
June 6 to June 10
Council Considers the Preliminary Results of the Market Analysis/Financial Model Results and Authorizes Conducting a Neighborhood Meeting on July 13 and Continuing the
Preparation of the Study and Bidding Documents
June 21
Continue the Design of Snow Making System using the Final
Layout for the Snow Tubing Area and Cross-Country Ski Trails June 22
The CITY of EDINA
Proposed Production Schedule
Key Milestones (Continues)
www.EdinaMN.gov 32
Description Date
Send Invitations to Neighborhood Meeting to Affected Nearby
Property Owners / Article Appears on the City Web Page and
Newspaper Briefly Describing the Project Advertising the
Meeting
June 29
Conduct Neighborhood Meeting at the Braemar Golf Course
Clubhouse to Review 90% Complete Study with Stakeholders July 13
Submit 90% Complete Study to City for Review by Park Board August 1
Park Board Reviews 90% Complete Study August 8
City Submits Comments for 90% Complete Study to SEH August 19
Submit Final Study to the City August 29 Council Considers the Study and Authorizes Advertisement for Bids September 6
The CITY of EDINA Proposed Production Schedule
Key Milestones (Continues)
Description Date
Submit Ad for Bid to the paper September 8
SEH Posts Final Bidding Documents to QuestCDN September 9
Advertise for Bids September 15 & 22
Open Bids October 5 Submit Recommendation of Award to City October 11
Council Considers Awarding a Construction Contract to a
Contractor October 18
City Uses Amount of Construction Contract for Budgeting
Purposes
–November /
December
Bond Sale to Finance this Project December 2016 / January 2017
www.EdinaMN.gov 33
The CITY of EDINA Proposed Production Schedule
Key Milestones (Continues)
Description Date
Contractor Begins Construction Winter 2016 / 2017
Snow Tubing Area and Cross-Country Ski Trails Relying on
Snow Open for Business December 2017 1
www.EdinaMN.gov 34
Notes: 1 Weather dependent
The CITY of EDINA Why so Expensive to
Construct?
www.EdinaMN.gov 35
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 36
The CITY of EDINA Lighting
www.EdinaMN.gov 37
Shoebox LED Directional LED
The CITY of EDINA Lighting
www.EdinaMN.gov 38
The CITY of EDINA Cutting Room Floor
www.EdinaMN.gov 39
The CITY of EDINA
•Blue arrows = Golf Course
construction Access
•Orange arrows =
Snowmaking/Trail construction
Access
•Red dashed arrows = later year
Snowmaking/Trail construction
access
•Golf Course Construction in
2017 concurrent with
Snowmaking/Trail Construction
•Utilize overlapping construction
access to site without future
impact to new course.
•Primary access for both
projects from parking lot.
Project Timing
www.EdinaMN.gov 40
The CITY of EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 41
The CITY of EDINA
Preliminary Market Analysis/
Financial Model Inputs
www.EdinaMN.gov 42
•Two scenarios each – Tubing & XC Skiing & Only XC Skiing
•Short season: 70 days (10 weeks, opening December 20 and closing
March 1)
•Long season: 84 days (12 weeks, opening December 20 and closing
March 15)
•Pricing
•$9 for Nordic day ticket, $75 for Nordic season pass
•$12 for Tubing (2-hour session)
•Cost savings for Labor, Insurance, Property Taxes, General &
Administrative expenses
•No Food & Beverage revenue or expense in current financial model
The CITY of EDINA
Snow Tubing & XC Skiing - Preliminary Market
Analysis/
Financial Model
SUMMARY - SHORT SEASON 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
Nordic Revenue $50,438 $54,073 $58,602 $62,597 $64,035
Tubing Revenue $69,240 $72,031 $74,802 $77,550 $80,272
Total Revenue $119,678 $126,104 $133,403 $140,147 $144,306
Operating Expenses $119,430 $121,819 $124,864 $127,362 $130,546
Operating Cash Flow $247 $4,284 $8,539 $12,785 $13,761
Operating Margin 0.2%3.4%6.4%9.1%9.5%
Depreciation $18,576 $18,948 $18,948 $19,326 $19,326
Net Cash Flow -$18,329 -$14,663 -$10,409 -$6,541 -$5,566
Net Cash Flow Margin -15.3%-11.6%-7.8%-4.7%-3.9%
www.EdinaMN.gov 43
Short Season: 70 Days
The CITY of EDINA
Snow Tubing & XC Skiing - Preliminary Market
Analysis/
Financial Model
SUMMARY - LONG SEASON 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
Nordic Revenue $57,495 $61,386 $66,331 $70,616 $72,356
Tubing Revenue $81,480 $84,801 $88,099 $91,372 $94,616
Total Revenue $138,975 $146,187 $154,430 $161,988 $166,972
Operating Expenses $134,359 $137,046 $140,473 $143,282 $146,864
Operating Cash Flow $4,616 $9,141 $13,958 $18,706 $20,108
Operating Margin 3.3%6.3%9.0%11.5%12.0%
Depreciation $18,576 $18,948 $18,948 $19,326 $19,326
Net Cash Flow -$13,960 -$9,807 -$4,990 -$620 $782
Net Cash Flow Margin -10.0%-6.7%-3.2%-0.4%0.5%
www.EdinaMN.gov 44
Long Season: 84 Days
The CITY of EDINA
Only XC Skiing - Preliminary Market Analysis/
Financial Model
SUMMARY - SHORT SEASON 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
Nordic Revenue $50,438 $54,073 $58,602 $62,597 $64,035
Tubing Revenue $69,240 $72,031 $74,802 $77,550 $80,272
Total Revenue $119,678 $126,104 $133,403 $140,147 $144,306
Operating Expenses $119,430 $121,819 $124,864 $127,362 $130,546
Operating Cash Flow $247 $4,284 $8,539 $12,785 $13,761
Operating Margin 0.2%3.4%6.4%9.1%9.5%
Depreciation $18,576 $18,948 $18,948 $19,326 $19,326
Net Cash Flow -$18,329 -$14,663 -$10,409 -$6,541 -$5,566
Net Cash Flow Margin -15.3%-11.6%-7.8%-4.7%-3.9%
www.EdinaMN.gov 45
Short Season: 70 Days
The CITY of EDINA
Only XC Skiing - Preliminary Market Analysis/
Financial Model
SUMMARY - LONG SEASON 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21
Nordic Revenue $57,495 $61,386 $66,331 $70,616 $72,356
Tubing Revenue $81,480 $84,801 $88,099 $91,372 $94,616
Total Revenue $138,975 $146,187 $154,430 $161,988 $166,972
Operating Expenses $134,359 $137,046 $140,473 $143,282 $146,864
Operating Cash Flow $4,616 $9,141 $13,958 $18,706 $20,108
Operating Margin 3.3%6.3%9.0%11.5%12.0%
Depreciation $18,576 $18,948 $18,948 $19,326 $19,326
Net Cash Flow -$13,960 -$9,807 -$4,990 -$620 $782
Net Cash Flow Margin -10.0%-6.7%-3.2%-0.4%0.5%
www.EdinaMN.gov 46
Long Season: 84 Days
The CITY of EDINA Pro Forma and Budgeting
•Long and short seasons are operationally cash flow positive
•RRC Pro Forma Utilizes 40% of staffing from Braemar
- $50,000 in operational support from golf enterprise
•Enterprise Fund vs. General Fund vs. Hybrid
- Outdoor Rinks (General Fund) vs. Braemar Arena
(Enterprise)
- Aquatic Center & Edinborough
- Braemar Arena & Braemar Field
•Not expected or able to repay construction debt
www.EdinaMN.gov 47
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.B.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Report / Recommendation
From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Ordinance No. 2016-09 Amending Chapter 4
Concerning Alcoholic Beverages
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Motion to grant first reading and waive second reading for Ordinance No. 2016-09 amending Chapter 4
concerning alcoholic beverages.
INTRODUCTION:
Buffalo Wild Wings has requested that they be allowed to provide patrons with tablets and charge a fee so patrons
can play video games while at their establishment. Police Chief, David Nelson did not have a concern that
allowing tablets to be used to play video games for a fee would negatively impact calls for service. Administration
and Community Health also have no objection to making this change to the City's Code regarding license liquor
establishments.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Ordinance No. 2016-09 Amending Chapter 4
187609v1
ORDINANCE NO. 2016-09
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE
CONCERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 4-9-10(b) of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows:
(b) Except as provided in subsection C, no on-sale intoxicating liquor license shall be granted to
any establishment that has amusement devices except to a restaurant and subject to the following:
(1) The licensed premises shall be at least 30,000 square feet in gross floor area.
(2) The licensed premises shall be located on a site that provides at least 250,000 square feet in
total building area, including primary buildings and any outlot building.
(3) Not more than 40 percent of the gross floor area of the licensed premises shall be used for
operation of amusement devices regulated by this section.
(4) The licensed premises shall contain at least 200 seats and provide a full food menu during
all hours that it is open to the general public.
(5) All regulated amusement devices shall be licensed in accordance with section 6-92 and shall
be located on the interior of the premises.
(6) The licensed premises shall be at least 500 feet from single dwelling or other residential
buildings. This distance shall be measured from the perimeter of the licensed premises to the
closest face of the residential building.
Section 2. Section 4-9-10 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding subsection C to provide as
follows:
( c) On-sale intoxicating liquor license may be granted to a restaurant that has tablet computer
amusement devices. The tablet computers must be licensed in accordance with section 6-92.
Section 3. This ordinance is effective upon adoption.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
187609v1
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.A.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Correspondence Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Attached is correspondence received since the last Council Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Correspondence Received As of June 16th
Correspondence Received as of June 21st
From:clover graham
To:Mary Brindle (Comcast); Kevin Staunton; James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com
Subject:Testing of fields
Date:Tuesday, June 07, 2016 11:37:34 AM
Hello,
I am following up again with you regarding crumb rubber in Edina.The article below details a school in China where children were experiencing headaches,
lightheadedness and nosebleeds. They tested the track and it was found to have high levels of benzene and formaldehyde, chemicals that are known to be in crumb rubber infill.
I have had multiple testimonials from parents about experiencing headaches and lightheadedness inside Braemar and I have had a staff member at Southview tell me that they
have seen multiple kids coming off Kuhlman with nosebleeds.We MUST test our city fields and our school fields to see what levels of chemicals they
contain.And we should also be testing air quality at our outdoor and indoor facilities.
There is NO regulation of this material. And every batch of tires is different. We must make sure that all Edina playing facilities are safe for our children.
I, personally, asked Susan Brott at EPS for access to Kuhlman field so that a third party could obtain material and test it.
After two unanswered emails over the course of a week, she responded by saying that EPS does not allow outside testing of its facilities.
If they will not allow me to test it, then they certainly should be performing the test themselves.
And so should the city on it's fields.Thank you so much for your attention to this important public health matter.
I look forward to working together to ensure the safety of our fields.Clover
http://www.thatsmags.com/beijing/post/13972/synthetic-running-track-sickens-kids-at-beijing-
school
Sent from my iPhone
From:Tyler Dobbs
To:Edina Mail
Cc:Chad Budreau
Subject:Drone Regulations
Date:Wednesday, June 08, 2016 2:07:13 PM
Dear Mayor Hovland,
The Academy of Model Aeronautics welcomes you to the Hoosier state during your visit to the
United States Conference of Mayors, June 24-27, in Indianapolis. The AMA is the world's largest
model aviation association based in Muncie, Indiana, 40 miles northeast of Indianapolis.
AMA is a strong proponent of drone safety in the airspace through programs such as the Know
Before You Fly campaign (http://knowbeforeyoufly.org), and Create a Drone Zone
(http://why.modelaircraft.org/drones).
We work closely with the Federal Aviation Administration, Congress, and the National Recreation
and Parks Association. The AMA also assists local governments, zoning boards, and parks
departments that are considering drone-related ordinances and regulations.
If you are considering enacting drone regulations, the AMA is a free, not-for-profit resource and we
would be happy to help. Contact me anytime at tylerd@modelaircraft.org, or call (765) 287-1256,
extension 235.
Thank you for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Tyler Dobbs
Government Affairs & Public Relations Assistant
Academy of Model Aeronautics
5161 E Memorial Drive
Muncie, IN 47302
(800)435-9262 - (765)287-1256 ext. 235 - Fax (765)289-4248
tylerd@modelaircraft.org
17m ago
25m ago
From:Barbara Polich
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Tavern on Valley View??
Date:Wednesday, June 08, 2016 5:04:28 PM
Barbara Polich from Concord
This is the frst I have heard of the following. I'm surprised our neighborhood hears about it from
a news article and am totally against putting in an outside/open air bar next to our bike paths,
parks and schools and residential homes. Since Rifakes said he hasn't met with the City, hopefully
common sense will prevail putting an end to outside coolers and a large patio out front that fows
from garage doors. The idea of listening to piped in music, laughing, car doors slamming, delivery
trucks in the middle of the night, congestion and drunks - especially in an area with a school,
stadium, bike paths, and Pamela Park is appalling. Please respond to the following article.
Barbara Polich from Concord
INDUSTRY NEWSFOOD & LIFESTYLE
Town Hall Brewery plans Edina restaurant
Jun 7, 2016, 1:00pm CDT
Town Hall Brewery is expanding beyond its three Minneapolis restaurants.
Owners Pete Rifakes and Paul Dzubnar plan to open Town Hall Station in the former Wally’s
Service Station at 4500 Valley View Road in Edina.
Town Hall co-owner Pete Rifakes is planning a restaurant in Edina.
Duzubnar pitched a conversion of the space in December 2014 but didn’t say what kind of
restaurant it would be. Dzubnar is also behind the Crooked Pint Ale House and Green Mill
chains and one-off restaurants like Harriet’s Inn in Minneapolis and Sweet Pea’s in St. Paul.
His Town Hall brand includes Town Hall Brewery on the West Bank of Minneapolis, Town Hall
Tap on Chicago Avenue and 48th Street, and Town Hall Lanes at 34th Avenue and 50th
Street.
Rifakes said the Edina Town Hall will be the smallest one yet. The building is about 2,000
square feet, which is 700 square feet smaller than Town Hall Tap.
Town Hall and Minneapolis-based architect Shea Design are doing all they can to maximize
the space. They plan to build the coolers outside and a large patio out front that flows from
garage doors.
Town Hall restaurants have old, refurbished wooden bars that Rifakes finds across the country,
hauling them back from places like Cincinnati and Washington. He said he's having a hard
time finding one small enough for the Edina restaurant, but hasn’t given up yet.
Rifakes wasn’t ready to give an opening date because he hasn’t met with the city, but said
they'll start paying rent Jan. 1.
“I don’t think is going to be a tough build-out,” he said.
Rifakes and Dzubnar have also pitched a Town Hall for Northeast Minneapolis, but Dzubnar
told me a few weeks ago that project won't happen before the Edina project.
Nick Halter covers retail and sports business.
From:Chad Millner
To:"Joshua M. Ahlberg"
Cc:Scott H. Neal; Ann Swenson; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Mark K. Nolan; James Hovland; groovysdoghouse;
Mary Brindle
Subject:RE: Sidewalk on Valley View Road
Date:Friday, June 10, 2016 8:08:51 AM
Josh,
Thanks for the comments. Just to clarify, one is not related to the other because they have separate
funding sources. Sidewalks have a dedicated and specific source from PACS. Parks projects are
funded in a variety of ways not from PACS.
Thanks
Chad Millner, Director of Engineering
952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392
cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: Joshua M. Ahlberg [mailto:josh.ahlberg@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:52 AMTo: Chad MillnerCc: Scott H. Neal; Ann Swenson; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Mark K. Nolan; James Hovland; groovysdoghouse; Mary BrindleSubject: RE: Sidewalk on Valley View Road
Hi Chad and team,
Thanks for context - it's helpful to understand the driving factors behind the project.
I do have one question though... May I ask why are we discussing funding projects like cross
country ski paths and redesigns of golf courses when the most basic pedestrian needs (in my opinion) haven't yet been satisfied in the community? I agree with the council that these are
great community enhancements, but overlooking projects like sidewalks to make way for what I see as nice to haves seems nonsensical. I would also note I have no way to use those
resources without a sidewalk in front of my home.
Thank you once again for your help.
- Josh Ahlberg6825 Valley View RD
612.458.4817
On Jun 10, 2016 7:19 AM, "Chad Millner" <cmillner@edinamn.gov> wrote:
Kristen,
Thanks for the comments. We also agree on the importance of a sidewalk along this segment of
Valley View Road. This segment of road will have some challenges in the installation but I’m
confident we can find a way. We are planning a neighborhood meeting this fall to begin discussions
with property owners to hear what is important to them so that we can start designing a sidewalk
such that we don’t limit what’s available when the street is reconstructed. These items include
parking lanes, bike lanes, sidewalk location, boulevard width, retaining walls, tree removals, etc.
We are also in the process of creating our Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This plan begins to detail
our projects specifically over the next two years but also begins to look ahead 5-years. We are
including money for a sidewalk along Valley View Road for 2017 - 2019. The year is still being
determined based on current projects being bid right now. This sidewalk will be expensive because
it will require large retaining walls and tree removals are of concern. This may require us to build it
in stages similar to what is occurring on Interlachen Blvd.
Please stayed tuned for the neighborhood meeting and continue to be an advocate for this sidewalk.
We know not everyone has the same support for sidewalks as you do.
Thanks,
Chad
Chad Millner, Director of Engineering
952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392
cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
From: groovysdoghouse@comcast.net [mailto:groovysdoghouse@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 6:40 PMTo: Mark K. Nolan; Chad Millner; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1Subject: Sidewalk on Valley View Road
Dear Mayor, City Council and Engineering Department Reps:
I read with great interest the article in the Trib on Sunday titled, "Sidewalks get some love in Edina". The article suggests that sidewalk requests are rare and are willingly approved. "The
council, which has an official policy of encouraging walking and biking in the city, didn't waste any time acting on the request." ..."City planners and engineers scarambled to fit the
sidewalks into already-planned summer street construction projects." Mr Millner "said city officials were happy to accommodate the residents. 'We always want to move forward -
making things safer and more connected, encourage health and wellness.'"
Three years ago I wrote raising my safety concern of the area of Valley View Road leading up to the high school, I pointed out that my parents built my house in 1968 and for pretty much
my entire life I have heard residents in the area question why there is no sidewalk on this route as it is recognized as an unsafe road. I moved into the house in 2013 with my children
and feel that it is not safe for them to walk to/from school. I also questioned why it was decided to first put a sidewalk on the lower end of Valley View Road up to Mark Terrace (not
within the school walking zone) and install an expensive round-a-bout in an area that doesn't see the traffic I would think would be necessary to justify that expense. Also at that time, a
second sidewalk was added on Valley View Road in front of St. Pat's (there was already one on the other side of Valley View Road at that location), yet from lower Mark Terrace up to
Gleason there is no side walk. It makes absolutley no sense that for over 40 years Gleason
Road, Antrim and Valley View Road in front of the school and down to Tracy Avenue have had sidewalks, but Valley View Road leading from Braemar up to Gleason has not, yet some
children are considered "walkers" in this section for school. Furthermore, as the highways surrounding this section of the city become more and more congested, people are cutting
through Edina and during rush hour Valley View Road is especially dangerous with a high volume of fast moving cars.
After reading the article, I am left with the impression that all we have to do is ask - which I
thought had been done by myself and other residents. Last Fall residents of this area submitted a Petition asking for a sidewalk on Valley View Road. If that wasn't a clear enough
indication of our request for a sidewalk in this area, I am again asking now. Will you please approve a sidewalk from lower Mark Terrace up to Gleason Road on Valley View Road? I
don't believe it is fair - or safe - to hold off on this necessity any longer.
Thank you,
Kristen Rice6916 Dakota Trail
952-941-4355
From:clover graham
To:James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com
Subject:Safety protocol for crumb rubber
Date:Monday, June 13, 2016 2:36:12 PM
Attachments:ATT00001.txt
ATT00002.txt
ATT00003.txt
Hello,
I have attached three visuals that I would like to further explain to you.
(Visual #1)-This is a photo of a cheerleading camp that my six year old niece was enrolled in at Pamela Park last
week.
I went by with my children to say hello to her after her mother had told me that the first day she came home covered
in black dust from the crumb rubber. (Visual 2-her skirt)
She did not take a photo of her hands, which were black, or of all the crumb rubber stuck in her hair, unfortunately.
When my children walked over the next day to say hello, the girls were "taking a break", which included activities
such as lying face down on the crumb rubber, cartwheeling on it and playing with it in their hands like grains of
sand.
Direct, extremely intimate contact with it.
I then heard the camp counselor say,
"Alright girls, it's time for snack!"
Well there is no place to wash your hands over near the turf, so the protocol was to use the hand sanitizer in the
porto potty, before snack.
(Hand sanitizer has been proven to increase the absorption of these chemicals into the skin and bloodstream , as per
Kathleen Schuler of Conservation MN)
My niece didn't get a snack that day because her mother did not want to add to her exposure.
(Visual 3)is a photo posted of kids in Fairfax County, Maryland playing with the crumb rubber, much the way the
Edina six year old cheerleaders were.
We must remember that this is a substance known to contain multiple carcinogens and neurotoxins.
A substance that has strict guidelines outlined on its Material Safety Data Sheet for the workers that install it,
including in many cases, required respirator masks.
(I have visuals of that as well should you want to see it).
We MUST work on a safety protocol surrounding crumb rubber in Edina.
These children are doing activities on the turf, that are absolutely unnecessary to do on turf.
High school soccer I can understand on some level, six year old cheerleading, I cannot.
Those girls were too young to understand that what they were rubbing themselves in was absolutely not dirt.
And neither they, their parents nor the camp counselors are being educated on how to reduce exposure.
No one was telling those girls not to lay on it or play with it.
And no one was telling them to wash their hands and NOT use hand sanitizer before eating.
Hand washing is a very basic step to reducing exposure, which is outlined by the Minnesota Department of Health in
their crumb rubber fact sheet.
As well shaking out clothing before leaving the field in order to avoid tracking the material home.
Many parents do not know what is in this material, and do not know how to best protect their children.
They assume that it is free from anything that harm their child in the short or long term. And that is simply not the
case.
We need education on this in Edina as well as a clear safety protocol for the parks department and the school
district.
Thank you,
Clover
Sent from my iPhone
From:Wood, George R.
To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com
Subject:Braemar and Tin Fish
Date:Monday, June 13, 2016 5:39:08 PM
My wife and I had a less than satisfactory experience with Tin Fish and, correspondingly, the
Braemar events folks with respect to my daughter’s graduation party last night. We had had my
oldest son’s party there in 2011 and decided to again that we wanted to have the party at Braemar
given our prior good experience. Things were different this time.
First, we were told that, in addition to the room fee, we would be charge $750 if we did not use one
of the City’s “approved” vendors as our caterer. I frankly could not understand why the City would
charge Edina residents more to use a City facility simply because we want to use a different caterer.
We were able to do that back in 2011 and it worked out well. This is a policy for Edina residents
that I think needs to be changed, particularly for such things as Grad parties, where the kids want
certain foods. I can certainly see it for non-resident events, but we should not be charging residents
an extra fee to use something we already pay taxes for in the first place.
Second, we had issues with Tin Fish, which we chose to use to avoid the higher fees. They charged
us for 5 1.5 liter bottles of unopened wine that we had ordered to make sure we had enough. They
refused to refund us for these even though they obviously will either use the wine at another event
or return it. They also refused to provide us with the leftover food (even though we were told we
would get it). Again, not sure why we would have vendors with such policies.
Finally, when I contacted the Braemar staff to discuss this, I was told that the caterers were
independent companies and the city had no control over them. If that is truly the case, then why
are we forced to use one of these caterers (like Tin Fish) or be charged $750? Either we have some
control over their policies, since we permit them in our City facility and effectively restrict use to
them, or we don’t have control over them and residents should be permitted to use whatever
caterer they wish.
We chose Braemar over Interlachen, where we are members, and ECC. We did so because of the
good experience we had back in 2011. We clearly made a mistake. I cannot in good conscience
recommend the use of Braemar to any of my friends given these policies. We certainly won’t be
using it—or Tin Fish. There are plenty of options out there for us to use and I think the City needs to
take that into account. The City should be there to provide the best for its residents, not the
caterers.
George R. Wood, Shareholder
612.313.7624 direct 612.670.5709 mobile 612.630.9626 fax GWood@littler.com
1300 IDS CENTER, 80 South 8th Street | Minneapolis, MN 55402-2136
| littler.com
Employment & Labor Law Solutions Worldwide
--------------------------
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you
are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
Littler Mendelson, P.C. is part of the international legal practice Littler Global, which operates
worldwide through a number of separate legal entities. Please visit www.littler.com for more information.
From:Leslie Iyer
To:Edina Mail
Cc:Cary Teague
Subject:Losing BP gas station 70th/France
Date:Tuesday, June 14, 2016 1:28:54 PM
Hello Mayor, City Council, and Mr. Teague,
I'm writing to let you know of my concern over the planned removal of the BP gas
station at 70th and France.
While gas stations are not glamorous, and this one is fairly pricey, it is the ONLY gas
station in all of Southeast Edina, and is the only one even south of 54th
Street/France. The entire SE quadrant of Edina - the entire Southdale area as well as
the single-family neighborhood to the west of Southdale, would be without a gas
station.
If there is a plan to replace this station with another nearby that serves our quadrant
of the city, that's fine - but I have not heard of one.
Please consider the residents' needs before changing the nature of this corner.
Thank you,
Leslie Iyer
6621 Southcrest Drive
Edina, MN 55435
From:Steve Kahn
To:James Hovland
Subject:Lake Cornelia
Date:Wednesday, June 15, 2016 1:12:05 PM
Dear Mayor Hovland:
My name is Steve Kahn. I had the pleasure of meeting you and your wife last
weekend when the two of you and a group of other volunteers were clearing
buckthorn from the Rosland Park wooded area. Thank you for doing that and
thanks to the other volunteers. While you were there, you asked me to take a
few pictures of you and your group which I was happy to do.
I’d like to ask a favor in return. Please help us with the lake weed problem in
Lake Cornelia. As you can see just by looking at the lake, it’s been overrun by
lake weeds. What appears to be algae is actually the tops of the weeds
growing up from the lake bed, and where you can’t see the tops, they’re
growing just below the surface. This is the case throughout nearly the entire
width and breadth of the lake on both the public and private sides. The lake is
choked with weeds to the point that you can no longer sail on the lake or use a
paddleboat. And I’m not sure there are fish still in the lake due to the weeds.
As you know, Lake Cornelia was arguably Edina’s nicest and most visible lake,
and the weeds have all but ruined it.
It’s my understanding that Lake Restoration Inc. is prepared to treat the weed
problem with chemicals and that the DNR has given them their blessing, but
the City of Edina has not.
Please do what you can to approve the treatment of Lake Cornelia so it can
once again look like the pristine natural resource it used to be.
Thanks for your help,
Steve & Jill Kahn
4317 Cornelia Circle
Edina, MN 55435
stevebkahn@gmail.com
From:Long, Jamie
To:Edina Mail; Scott H. Neal
Cc:Johnson, Elyse
Subject:Congressman Ellison Meeting
Date:Wednesday, June 15, 2016 6:37:15 PM
June 15, 2016
Dear Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council:
I am writing to request a meeting with you in the coming months to discuss the issues of greatest
interest to Edina, and to provide a brief update on activities in Congress. Because I am in
Washington D.C. the bulk of the year, I always look forward to opportunities to connect with the
units of government closest to the community.
Please be in touch with Elyse Johnson, my scheduler, to coordinate a meeting
(elyse.johnson@mail.house.gov). I have limited availability during the evenings when I am back in
Minnesota, so if possible, I would appreciate flexibility in trying to schedule a meeting in the
morning or over lunch.
Best Regards,
Congressman Keith Ellison
From:Lee Stewart
To:Edina Mail
Subject:A Message From EXIM Bank Chairman Fred Hochberg
Date:Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:01:28 PM
Mayor Hovland,
In preparation for your attendance at the 84th Annual U.S. Conference of Mayors in Indianapolis, please see the
letter below from Export-Import Bank Chairman and President Fred Hochberg.
Best regards,
Lee Stewart
Director of Intergovernmental Affairs
Export-Import Bank of the United States
d: 202.565.3773 | c: 202.344.6664
______________________________________________________________________________
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES
FRED P. HOCHBERG, CHAIRMAN AND PRESIDENT
June 15, 2016
The Honorable James B. Hovland
Mayor, City of Edina
Dear Mayor Hovland:
On behalf of the Export-Import Bank of the United States (EXIM), I am delighted to join you at the 84th Annual
Meeting of the U.S. Conference of Mayors in Indianapolis. I will be speaking at the Metro Exports and Ports Task
Force Meeting on Friday, June 24th, at 2:30 p.m. at the JW Marriott Hotel. I hope you are able to attend this
discussion to learn how EXIM can empower exporters and support job growth in your city. In the lead up to this
meeting, I invite you to visit our interactive map to see how EXIM supports exporters in and around your city.
EXIM Bank is the official export credit agency of the United States. When private sector lenders are unable or
unwilling to provide financing, EXIM fills in the gap for American businesses by equipping them with the
financing tools necessary to compete for global sales. In doing so, the Bank levels the playing field for U.S. goods
and services going up against foreign competition in overseas markets, so that American companies can create more
good-paying American jobs.
In fiscal year 2015, EXIM supported 109,000 U.S. jobs by way of approximately $17 billion in export finance
authorizations. EXIM empowers U.S. exporters of all sizes to succeed in a global economy, with nearly 90 percent
of EXIM transactions directly benefitting small businesses.
However, EXIM is currently unable to act on more than $20 billion worth of transactions that require approval from
its Board of Directors. Without a Board quorum, EXIM is unable to approve medium- and long-term transactions
over $10 million. In January, President Obama nominated J. Mark McWatters to serve on EXIM’s bipartisan Board.
Until the Senate confirms his nomination, American exporters of all sizes will continue to face real barriers when
competing in foreign markets. Despite these challenges, EXIM remains committed to working with local exporters
nationwide to support U.S. jobs.
American companies produce some of the highest quality, most innovative goods and services in the world—and
thousands of those companies count on EXIM financing to effectively compete in global markets. I look forward to
working with you so that we can continue to support more American exporters and more quality American jobs.
If you have any questions concerning EXIM’s programs and policies, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at
(202) 565-3500, or Lee Stewart, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs, at (202) 565-3773.
Sincerely,
Fred P. Hochberg
From:Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative
To:James Hovland
Subject:66 West Groundbreaking - July 12
Date:Thursday, June 16, 2016 3:23:17 PM
Please join us for the 66 West groundbreaking!
July 12, 5 p.m.
66 West Groundbreaking
Tuesday, July 12
5pm - 6:30pm
Brief program at 5:30
You are invited to the 66 West ground breaking.
You've helped to create 39 homes for youth who have experienced
homelessness. Join us to celebrate the start of construction.
Where:
Site of 66 West
3330 West 66th Street
Edina, MN 55435
Limited parking will be
available after 5pm at the
Southdale Place Office
Building west of the 66
West site. Please consider
carpooling or using transit.
If you have questions, please call Claire at 651-789-6260 x223.
Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative | 651-789-6260 | beaconinterfaith.org
Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative, 2610 University Avenue West, Suite 100, St.
Paul, MN 55114
SafeUnsubscribe™ jhovland@edinamn.gov
Forward this email | Update Profile | About our service provider
Sent by mohama@beaconinterfaith.org in collaboration with
Try it free today
From:John Retherford
To:James Hovland
Subject:FW: City Pond Policy
Date:Friday, June 17, 2016 12:36:46 PM
Attachments:20160617123513184.pdf
-----Original Message-----
From: Scan Quinstar
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 12:35 PM
To: John Retherford <jretherford@quinstarllc.com>
Subject:
This E-mail was sent from "RNPDA186B" (Aficio MP C4500).
Scan Date: 06.17.2016 12:35:12 (-0500)
Queries to: scanquinstar@quinstarllc.com
From:Becky Christopher
Subject:MCWD Capital Improvement Plan
Date:Friday, June 17, 2016 4:51:46 PM
Attachments:MCWD Draft CIP_5-26-16.pdf
Dear City and County Administrators, Mayors, and Staff,
As it does each year at this time, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (District) is distributing its
revised Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for your review and comment. Your input on the revised
draft CIP is valuable in helping to identify new opportunities to work together to improve water
resources.
The District’s 2007 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (Plan) and CIP only extend
through 2016, and the District is currently in the process of working with its communities and other
partners to develop its next generation Plan for adoption in June of 2017. For this reason, this year’s
CIP is limited to projects currently slated for implementation in 2016 and 2017.
As part of the process to develop the 2017 Plan, the District will be hosting a series of local
subwatershed meetings later this year to discuss local plans, priorities, and partnership
opportunities in each community. The District would like its Plan to reflect the goals and priorities of
its communities and establish a framework for ongoing coordination of plans and investments.
These meetings will inform the 2017 Plan and CIP which will be distributed for review and comment
in early 2017. In preparation for these local subwatershed meetings, the District will soon be
sending a request for information from its cities, counties, and partner agencies.
The draft CIP is attached for your review. You are invited to submit comments on the proposed draft
CIP as well as suggestions for how the District can better integrate its water resource improvement
efforts with land use planning in your community. Please submit comments via mail or email no
later than July 18, 2016. Feel free to contact me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Becky Christopher
Lead Planner & Project Manager
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
15320 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55345
952-641-4512 || www.minnehahacreek.org
Tr
a
c
k
S
u
b
w
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Estimated Cost 1 Potential Funding Sources
Co
s
t
S
h
a
r
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
a
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
t
h
r
o
ug
h
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
c
i
t
i
e
s
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
,
l
a
n
d
o
w
n
e
r
s
,
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
.
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
M
o
r
n
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
G
r
a
n
t
a
w
a
r
d
e
d
f
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
r
o
a
d
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
ru
c
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
10,000 $
Gl
e
a
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
P
o
n
d
e
r
o
s
a
R
o
a
d
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
a
n
t
a
w
a
r
d
e
d
f
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
C
i
t
y
o
f
P
l
y
m
o
u
t
h
r
o
a
d
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
io
n
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
12,750 $
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
W
i
d
e
F
a
l
l
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
p
e
r
i
o
d
Th
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
c
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
a
s
e
c
o
n
d
r
o
u
n
d
o
f
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
g
r
e
e
n
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
f
a
l
l
.
200,000 $
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
t
o
m
a
n
a
g
e
3
6
a
c
r
e
s
o
f
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
3
.
5
a
c
r
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
.
92,188 $ MCWD Levy
Me
a
d
o
w
b
r
o
o
k
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
B
o
a
r
d
f
o
r
s
t
r
e
a
m
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
f
l
o
o
d
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
,
a
n
d
i
n
c
re
a
s
e
d
f
l
o
o
d
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
.
2
,
0
3
2
,
3
9
0
$ $1,932,390 MCWD Levy, $100,000 Hennepin County grant 2,347,328 $
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
W
i
d
e
C
o
s
t
S
h
a
r
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
a
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
d
en
t
i
f
i
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
c
i
t
i
e
s
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
,
l
a
n
d
o
w
n
er
s
,
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
partners. 400,000 $ MCWD Levy
La
k
e
M
i
n
n
e
t
o
n
k
a
G
r
a
y
s
B
a
y
H
w
y
1
0
1
Ca
u
s
e
w
a
y
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
wi
t
h
H
e
n
n
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
t
o
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
a
n
d
e
nh
a
n
c
e
s
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
H
w
y
1
0
1
a
t
L
a
k
e
M
i
n
n
e
t
o
n
k
a
.
1,604,308 $ $1,574,308 MCWD Levy, $30,000 Hennepin County
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
F
l
o
o
d
D
a
m
a
g
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
Re
p
a
i
r
of
s
t
r
e
a
m
b
a
n
k
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
2
0
1
4
f
l
o
o
d
.
-$ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
H
i
a
w
a
t
h
a
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
B
o
a
r
d
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
t
o
r
e
p
a
i
r
f
l
o
o
d
d
a
m
a
g
e
a
n
d
m
a
n
a
g
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
.
TBD
F
E
M
A
,
M
C
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
M
P
R
B
,
C
i
t
y
o
f
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
,
g
r
a
n
t
s
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
t
o
d
a
t
e
:
La
k
e
S
t
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
H
o
p
k
i
n
s
t
o
d
i
v
e
r
t
3
0
a
c
r
e
s
o
f
s
t
o
r
mw
a
t
e
r
f
o
r
v
o
l
u
m
e
a
n
d
l
o
a
d
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
249,752 $ $124,876 Public Facilities Authority, $124,876 MCWD Levy
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
t
o
d
a
t
e
:
Pi
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
o
w
n
e
r
s
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
n
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
t
o
P
i
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
.
1,270,000 $
Ma
r
s
h
/
W
a
s
s
e
r
m
a
n
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
V
i
c
t
o
r
i
a
a
nd
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
t
o
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
we
t
l
a
n
d
s
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
n
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
l
o
a
di
n
g
t
o
W
a
s
s
e
r
m
a
n
L
a
k
e
.
271,605 $ 3,795,665 $
4 Th
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
i
t
s
p ar
t
n
e
r
s
a
r
e
i
n
t
h
e
p ro
c
e
s
s
o
f
d
e
v
e
l
o
p in
g a
n
i
n
t
e
g ra
t
e
d
i
m
p le
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
p la
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
S
i
x
M
i
l
e
C
r
ee
k
S
u
b
w
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
.
F
u
n
d
i
n
g s
o
u
r
c
e
s
m
a
y i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
M
C
W
D
L
e
v
y , Clean Water Le g ac y , Public Facilities Authorit y , Section 206, and p ro j ect p artners.
20
1
6
20
1
7
2017 Total
3 Un
d
e
r
t
h
e
T
w
o
-
T
r
a
c
k
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
,
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
f
o
c
u
s
e
s
s
t
a
f
f
a
n
d
f
i
n
a
n
c
ia
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
t
o
h
i
g
h
n
e
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
m
a
k
e
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
,
l
a
s
t
i
n
g
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
m
o
s
t
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
w
a
t
e
r
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
.
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
ri
c
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
Tr
a
c
k
2
2 Un
d
e
r
t
h
e
T
w
o
-
T
r
a
c
k
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
,
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
r
e
m
a
i
n
s
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
to
n
e
e
d
s
a
n
d
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
w
i
d
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
hi
p
s
,
g
r
a
n
t
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
p
r
o
g
r
am
s
.
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
a
r
e
e
n
couraged to approach the District wit h project opportunities which may be
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
C
I
P
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
t
i
m
i
n
g
,
a
l
i
g
nm
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
g
o
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
.
1 Co
s
t
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
l
i
s
t
e
d
d
o
n
o
t
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
c
t
u
a
l
b
u
d
g
e
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
y
e
a
r
s
.
F
o
r
i
n
s
t
a
n
c
e
,
t
h
e
y
d
o
n
o
t
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
f
o
r
c
a
r
r
y
o
v
e
r
f
r
o
m
p
a
st
y
e
a
r
s
,
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
l
e
v
i
e
d
ov
e
r
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
y
e
a
r
s
,
o
r
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
g
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
.
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
Si
x
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
2016 TotalMCWD Levy TBD 4
Fo
c
u
s
T
r
a
c
k
3
Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
Tr
a
c
k
2
Fo
c
u
s
T
r
a
c
k
3
DRAFT
From:Shirley Burr
To:James Hovland
Subject:Interested in a City of Edina Speaker for a EFWC Meeting
Date:Sunday, June 19, 2016 8:26:37 PM
Hello –
As President-Elect of the Edina Federated Women’s Club, it is my responsibility to arrange for
speakers/presentations for the four daytime EFWC meetings that are held each year.
I have been thinking that the topic of “housing in Edina” would interest our members. Most people
understand the concepts of owning a single family home vs. renting a home or apartment. Things
get a little fuzzier when it comes to understanding the differences between townhomes,
condominiums, and (especially) cooperatives. And then, of course, there are homes for seniors that
fall under the category of independent living/assisted living/nursing care/memory care.
We would so appreciate having you (of course) or someone you designate within the City to:
· Summarize the kinds of housing that currently exist in Edina, with a brief explanation of the
different categories; and
· Insight into where the City of Edina is headed regarding housing for the various generational
groups that currently reside in Edina, or want to live here.
Regarding possible dates, my first preference would be Thursday, October 13, 2016.
Other possible dates are:
· Thursday, January 12, 2017
· Thursday, March 9, 2017
The presenter would be invited to be our guest at the 11:30 a.m. luncheon that precedes the
presentation. Meetings take place at St. Alban’s Church in Edina.
I may be reached at 952-829-1813, or at my personal email address of sburr@usjet.net.
Thank you in advance for considering my request, and suggesting what my next steps should be.
Shirley Burr
From:Sara Jones
To:Edina Mail; Troy Stein
Subject:Braemar Winter Recreation Plans
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:56:03 AM
Dear Council Members and Mayor Hovland,
I just learned that the Braemar Winter Recreation project is on hold and not in the 5-year
capital plan. The plan for Nordic ski trails is vital to the high school ski team's continued success. The construction projects at the high school and other plans for Creek Valley
Elementary and the Nine Mile Creek trail will nearly eliminate the ski trails the ski team has worked so hard to build over the last several years. These trails were built by skiers, skiers'
families, and coaches through hard work, significant planning, and large investments of time and money from skiers' families. While other teams are getting new and better facilities, the
ski team's "facilities" are being decimated. Without Edina trails at Braemar on which to practice, the team will be at an serious disadvantage to say the very least. It's extremely
difficult (if not nearly impossible) to get regular practice time at Hyland Park. Busing all the way to Wirth Park is not feasible either.
You know how significant and inclusive the ski team is at Edina High School. It is the 3rd
largest team the high school has and provides instruction and coaching for nearly 200 athletes from those with no previous experience all the way through our winning varsity
teams and individual racers. Moreover, many of its members are some of the best scholar-athletes at Edina High School. This is a team that should be supported and nurtured by the
community.
Not only the Edina High School team uses the trails built by the team either. Community members regularly use the ski trails. Having trails at Braemar will serve both the team and the
community. This healthy option for recreation will be a much-needed community resource in addition to helping one of the most popular team sports at the high school. I don't know
whether you have considered modest trail pass fees for community users, but that certainly is a reasonable way to offset some costs of building and maintaining trails.
Please support and advocate for the continued inclusion of Braemar trails in the capital plan
and beyond!
Sara Jones612-940-2485
From:Common Sense Edina
To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com
Cc:Scott H. Neal
Subject:Common Sense for Edina - Search for new Braemar Ice Arena and dome manager
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 10:58:54 AM
With the resignation at the end of June by the current Braemar Ice Arena manager I would suggest the city of Edina involve the key stakeholders of the facility in choosing the next
arena manager. The current arena manager at the Bloomington Ice Gardens (BIG), Andy Baltgalvis, is retiring at the end of July after decades at the facility. Andy is considered to be
the dean of ice rink managers in MN and is highly respected among his peers and by his current employer. If Andy is interested I would suggest engaging Andy as an interim arena
manager at Braemar and again if he is interested to help with the search for a new rink manager at Braemar.
There are plenty of experienced rink managers in MN who would be interested in managing
one of the largest municipal sports facilities in MN. As I mentioned I would suggest involving the following key stakeholders in the search for a new rink manager:
Edina High School hockey Coaches
Edina Hockey AssocBraemar Figure Skating Club
Edina Soccer Assoc/Club and other key dome rental organizations.
Edina deserves to have an experienced and competent manager at the Braemar Ice Arena and Dome. There should be a rigorous selection process for external and internal candidates but
this should not be an automatic promotion for an internal candidate. All job positions with the city Edina should be posted to the general public (see Bloomington below) and the best
candidate should be selected based on his/her credentials that match the job description for that position.
Bloomington Ice Garden Manager posted job description:
http://agency.governmentjobs.com/bloomingtonmn/default.cfm?action=viewJob&jobID=1452994
David Frenkel
From:Julia Parenteau
To:Edina Mail; Scott H. Neal
Subject:May 2016 Edina Home Sales Statistics
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 2:08:02 PM
Attachments:1 Twin-Cities.pdf
Edina.pdf
Good Afternoon, Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council –
Attached please find the May 2016 home sales market report from the Minneapolis Area Association
of REALTORS® for the City of Edina and the Twin Cities region.
In the Twin Cities, pending home purchase activity exceeded year-ago levels for the 18th consecutive
month. Buyers signed 6,809 new purchase agreements, a 9.9 percent gain compared to May 2015.
Closed sales, however, rose 5.3 percent to 6,167—the highest May closed sales figure on record. In
large part due to low inventory, would-be sellers are concerned about their ability to secure their
next property in the current competitive environment. Inventory levels fell 20.6 percent to 13,372
active properties. Because of record demand, weak supply and a more expensive mix of homes
selling, the May median sales price rose 5.7 percent to $236,826—second only to June 2006 for the
highest monthly median sales price on record.
You may also review these reports for Edina, as well as cities and counties throughout the Greater
Minneapolis-Saint Paul area, on our website. Should you have any questions about the home sales
data, please feel free to contact me!
Julia Parenteau
Vice President, Public Affairs
Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS®
p. (952) 988-3124
e. juliap@mplsrealtor.com
2015 2016 + / – 2015 2016 + / –
New Listings 8,585 8,680 + 1.1% 35,247 35,092 -0.4%
Closed Sales 5,856 6,167 + 5.3% 19,699 20,929 + 6.2%
Median Sales Price*$224,000 $236,826 + 5.7% $214,000 $225,900 + 5.6%
Average Sales Price*$261,765 $276,579 + 5.7% $254,404 $266,848 + 4.9%
Price Per Square Foot*$128 $134 + 4.8% $123 $130 + 5.4%
Percent of Original List Price Received*97.5%98.6%+ 1.1% 96.1%97.2%+ 1.1%
Days on Market Until Sale 76 60 -21.1% 91 76 -16.5%
Inventory of Homes for Sale 16,846 13,372 -20.6% -- -- --
Months Supply of Inventory 3.8 2.7 -28.9% -- -- --
** Each dot represents the change in median sales price from the prior year using a 6-month weighted average. This means that each of the 6 months used in a dot are
proportioned according to their share of sales during that period. | Current as of June 8, 2016. All data from NorthstarMLS. | Powered by ShowingTime 10K.
Local Market Update – May 2016
A RESEARCH TOOL PROVIDED BY THE MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Twin Cities Region
+ 1.1% + 5.3% + 5.7%
Change in
New Listings
Change in
Closed Sales
Change in
Median Sales Price
May Year to Date
* Does not account for seller concessions. | Activity for one month can sometimes look extreme due to small sample size.
Twin Cities Region
- 30%
- 25%
- 20%
- 15%
- 10%
- 5%
0%
+ 5%
+ 10%
+ 15%
+ 20%
1-2008 7-2008 1-2009 7-2009 1-2010 7-2010 1-2011 7-2011 1-2012 7-2012 1-2013 7-2013 1-2014 7-2014 1-2015 7-2015 1-2016
Change in Median Sales Price from Prior Year (6-Month Average)**
a
35,247
19,699
35,092
20,929
New Listings Closed Sales
Year to Date 2015 2016
+ 6.2%-0.4%
8,585
5,856
8,680
6,167
New Listings Closed Sales
May 2015 2016
+ 5.3%+ 1.1%
2015 2016 + / – 2015 2016 + / –
New Listings 195 174 -10.8% 780 735 -5.8%
Closed Sales 107 109 + 1.9% 347 363 + 4.6%
Median Sales Price*$424,450 $450,000 + 6.0% $395,000 $405,000 + 2.5%
Average Sales Price*$522,558 $530,254 + 1.5% $480,674 $494,334 + 2.8%
Price Per Square Foot*$202 $197 -2.5% $185 $190 + 2.7%
Percent of Original List Price Received*96.0%95.7%-0.3% 95.2%95.4%+ 0.2%
Days on Market Until Sale 101 95 -5.9% 105 103 -1.9%
Inventory of Homes for Sale 421 356 -15.4% -- -- --
Months Supply of Inventory 5.2 4.1 -21.2% -- -- --
** Each dot represents the change in median sales price from the prior year using a 6-month weighted average. This means that each of the 6 months used in a dot are
proportioned according to their share of sales during that period. | Current as of June 8, 2016. All data from NorthstarMLS. | Powered by ShowingTime 10K.
Local Market Update – May 2016
A RESEARCH TOOL PROVIDED BY THE MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
- 10.8% + 1.9% + 6.0%
Change in
New Listings
Change in
Closed Sales
Change in
Median Sales Price
Twin Cities Region
Edina
May Year to Date
Edina
* Does not account for seller concessions. | Activity for one month can sometimes look extreme due to small sample size.
- 30%
- 25%
- 20%
- 15%
- 10%
- 5%
0%
+ 5%
+ 10%
+ 15%
+ 20%
1-2008 7-2008 1-2009 7-2009 1-2010 7-2010 1-2011 7-2011 1-2012 7-2012 1-2013 7-2013 1-2014 7-2014 1-2015 7-2015 1-2016
Change in Median Sales Price from Prior Year (6-Month Average)**b
a
780
347
735
363
New Listings Closed Sales
Year to Date 2015 2016
+ 4.6%-5.8%
195
107
174
109
New Listings Closed Sales
May 2015 2016
+ 1.9%-10.8%
From:Mary & Steve Sando
To:James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com
Subject:Fwd: APNA Flyer
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 3:36:19 PM
Attachments:APNA.Flyer.pdf
Dear Mayor & Council Members,
See below information on a meet & greet at Arden Park on Sunday, June 26th.
Love to see you if you can make it.
Thanks,Steve Sando, APNA Committee
Sent from my iPad
Mary and Steve Sando
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Doug O'Leary" <doleary@rdomarketing.com>
Date: June 13, 2016 at 10:33:56 AM CDTTo: "'Steve Sando'" <ssando1@comcast.net>, "Sara Moran"
<moransshine@gmail.com>, "Troy Paulson" <tpclayton@hotmail.com>, "Nora O'Leary" <noleary@heii.us>
Subject: APNA Flyer
For your review…
Doug O’Leary
RDO Marketing, LLC
Smarter Ways to Win
4820 W 77th St., Suite 120
Edina, MN 55435-4809
Phone/Fax: 952-746-7585
Arden Park Neighborhood Association
Why Attend?
To be informed on what is going on in your neighborhood
To meet your fellow Arden Park neighbors
To voice your key interests and concerns
To help guide future Arden Park Neighborhood Association activities
To volunteer for future APNA activities, if you like
Meeting Agenda
About the Arden Park Neighborhood Association / Mission & Goals
Introduce the APNA volunteer steering committee
Guest Speaker: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District / The Future of Minnehaha Creek
Bring your family; all are welcome! / Tell your neighbors!
Refreshments will be served!
Send us your e-mail address to receive future APNA news: ArdenParkNA@gmail.com
For more information on the APNA, visit the
City of Edina Website:
http://edinamn.gov/?section-edina-neighborhood-associations
Join Us !
Sunday, June 26th
from 1-3PM
Introductory Meeting
From:t_youel
To:Edina Mail
Cc:tsudeith@playcore.com; brucefreeman05@earthlink.net; Richard Jahnke
Subject:Mountain Biking at Braemar
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 3:58:21 PM
Hi
It has come to our attention that a vote is being considered to ban both winter and summer mountain biking at
Braemar and to tax the community for a ski trail. The Edina Mountain bike team is growing exponentially and it
would seem that it is much to early for such an extreme action without more community notice or input
Ted Youel
4228 Oakdale Ave South
Edina, Mn
Sent from my iPhone
From:Ann Kattreh
To:Edina Mail
Subject:RE: In Support of Mountain Biking at Braemar
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 4:35:41 PM
Attachments:image005.png
image006.png
Yes, please.
Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director
952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
The City of Edina was named one of the Star Tribune’s Top Workplaces in 2015!
From: Lynette Biunno On Behalf Of Edina MailSent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:48 PMTo: Ann KattrehSubject: FW: In Support of Mountain Biking at Braemar
Hi Ann,
Did you want me to send this to the Council members?
Lynette Biunno, Receptionist
952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389
lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov
From: Richard Jahnke [mailto:rjahnke@sunbeltmidwest.com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:36 PMTo: Edina MailCc: t_youel; brucefreeman05@earthlink.net; Ann Kattreh; Tom Delaney; kpellsworth@msn.com;
ben@sportresourcegroup.comSubject: In Support of Mountain Biking at Braemar
Hi Ann
Just wanted to encourage you to send our/ your recommendation to the Tuesday night 6/21/2016 City Council
about the critical importance of including MTB biking trails in the Braemar strategic plan.
I can't emphasize enough how important this chance is to create a fantastic MTB trail system. But not just for some
but, all the riders and parents of the Edina HS MTB bike team.
There are many strong advocates for mountain biking at Braemar. I’m sending you information that
more clearly outlines our position
and gives more details about MTB biking in Edina and a plan of action for creating it. We are
extremely
fortunate in this metro area to have one of the nation’s strongest MTB biking associations.
Minnesota of Road Cycling (MORC).
MORC who are experts in helping cities develop MTB biking trails. Reid Schmidt, the president has
set forth a perfect
example with his involvement with the city of Woodbury and developing the Carver Lake trail
systems.
In summary:
MTB Biking at Braemar, uses land currently not in use,
MTB the least expensive sport facility and has basically zero maintenance costs,
is a tremendous workout for Edina’s kids and citizens for better health,
can be done at almost any age as a life long sport,
will provide 2nd largest MTB high school biking team in state a place to practice,
MTB is wildly growing in popularity!
Thank you, long time Edina Residents
Richard Jahnke, Tom Delaney, Ted Youel and Bruce Freeman
Subject: Proposed Edina winter rec area at Braemar--fat biking not consideredThe city council is considering a winter recreation area at Braemar golf course, dedicated to
Nordic skiing and tubing. It's my understanding that fat biking will not be permitted and that the city has not evaluated the interest in fat biking trails. Summer mountain biking also will
not be allowed.
The recreation area would be fee-based. The city would bond to cover construction costs, with a taxes levied to pay off the bonds. Fees would go to operational expenses.
Two 25-feet wide swaths will be cleared to make the trails.
I attended a council work session last week and a majority of council members expressed
support for the Nordic skiing/tubing recreation area.
This seems like a lost opportunity to evaluate fat biking/mountain biking as an additional option.
The council meeting is this Tuesday, June 21. If interested, please email the council at
mail@edinamn.gov to share your thoughts.
Jennifer Janovy
http://edina.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=1500&MeetingID=55
From:Matthew Egger
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar Nordic Snow Making
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 8:59:20 PM
Dear City Council members,
This upcoming year will be my third year on the Edina Nordic program as a sophomore. I am a member of the varsity squad, and I train year-round for cross country skiing; I am very
dedicated. Not only would snow-making at Braemar help me develop my potential in the sport, it would also help nearly 200 students get outside to help relieve stress and spend some
quality time outside with their teammates in the winter. I urge the council to vote in support of the project at Braemar.
Thank you,Matthew Egger
From:Shand, Tracy
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Please vote yes for Braemar ski trails
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 8:59:45 PM
HI ! Please vote yes to the ski trails at Braemar.
Building ski trails at Braemar is absolutely critical for the very future of the Edina Nordic Ski
Team because we are losing most of our current 5km of practice space at the high school.
New construction at the high school, going on right now, has already eliminated almost a
kilometer of our trails and next summer we will lose two more kilometers and lose our best
hills, as the Nine Mile Creek Trail gets built. We have the 3rd largest sport at Edina High
School, with nearly 200 athletes. We simply will not have enough space for the team to
practice anymore. As our climate warms, we can no longer count on natural snow to fall when
we need it, and fall deep enough to cover most natural ski trails in the area. Making snow
works, but there just isn’t enough of it to go around. We only get about 1 practice slot at
Hyland Park each week. We can’t be competitive with only one on-snow practice a week.
Thanks!
Tracy Shand
t shand
maharam, sales
minneapolis, mn
+1.312.596.7634
+1.800.645.3943 x7634
+1.612.382.1116 m
sales coordinator
heather ross
hross@maharam.com
+1.312.596.7626
+1.800.645.3943 x7626
From:Gretchen Johns
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Please allow trails at Braemar
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:00:08 PM
Both of my kids go to Edina Highschool and participate in the Nordic Ski Program. For my
8th grade son this is the ONLY sport he participates in and without the trails available at Edina Highschool available this coming winter, I would hate to have him quit sports entirely.
Its’ a great program-- one of the largest, “non-cut” sports programs for kids in both the middle school and high school. Please help fund Nordic at Braemar....
Gretchen Johns, parent of two kids at EHS.
From:Kathleen MULROONEY
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Trails at Braemar
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:03:32 PM
To whom this concerns,
I am writing this email in support of developing trails at Braemar that the Cross country ski team and cross country
enthusiasts in Edina can use. The team at EHS which also includes middle school skiers, has grown in number and
success these past years. The amazing coaches and numerous parent volunteers have spent countless hours over the
years developing trails on the high school grounds. Unfortunately much of that effort will be obsolete due to
construction. It would be wonderful if the city could develop trails not only the high school and middle schoolers
could use but others as well.
Thank you so much for noticing the positive addition these trails will have for so many.
Thank you,
Kathleen
Sent from my iPhone
From:Kathy Simon
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar Nordic ski trails project
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:09:19 PM
Hi City Council Members,
Please consider approving funding to support the proposal to have snow making and trail grooming at Braemar .
This would be a wonderful asset to our community. Additionally, similar for the ice arena used by the Edina HS
hockey teams (80 kids for both boys and girls varsity and JV), the ski trails at Braemar could be used by the Edina
HS Nordic team which has well over 200 kids on it. The team is losing their training area at the HS due to all the
construction changes being made to the grounds.
With our sporadic winter weather, the snow making is imperative to offer skiable conditions for the whole winter.
Similar to Edina putting in a fourth sheet at Braemar which offered an outdoor rink with refrigeration, Edina could
really benefit from adding the snow making for ski trails at Braemar. Tin fish needs the winter business too!!
Thank you,
Kathy
From:Thomas Shaw
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Ski trails and snow making
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:09:46 PM
I am writing in support of the proposed investment in cros country ski trails and limited artificial snow making at
Braemar golf course. This durable investment on the part of the City of Edina will increase public access to this
healthful family activity, maintain the competative stance of the Edina High School team as it loses trail space to
school and public infrastructure improvements around 9 Mile Creek and will add value to the under-utilized golf
course during the winter. Similar improvements to Three Rivers Park District parks have led to exponential
increases in facility usage and sport participation. It will also provide an additional venue for an expansion of the
MInnesota Youth Ski League.
Thomas G. Shaw
Assistant Coach
Edina High School Cross Country Ski Team
& Program Supervisor, Cahill School/Edina Historical Society
From:Mark Larson
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar ski trails
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:16:53 PM
To the council,
I am in strong support of the proposed trails for cross country skiing in Edina! I have a son on the Edina H.S. Nordic
team and my wife and I would love to use the trails as well. Please support this opportunity!
Thanks,
Mark Larson
Mark Larson
Principal
Rehkamp Larson Architects
From:Lisa Hollensteiner
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Nordic Trails
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:23:20 PM
Dear City Council-Please vote for proceeding forward with the Braemar Nordic Trails! The
Nordic Ski Team has 200 kids who need somewhere to ski! The construction is taking up their current ski trails and Hyland only gives then an hour a week. I and many others in the
community would love to use them as well. Great to have Braemar in our community and we should utilize it year round. Thank you! Lisa Hollensteiner
From:joshriff@gmail.com
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar ski trails
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:26:47 PM
I am writing to encourage you to approve the proposal to build ski trails on the braemar course. When I moved to
Edina seven years ago I did so for the sense of community and commitment to our youth. We specifically chose this
area for our three children as we put their education ahead of all things else. We also chose Edina as we are an
outdoor recreational family. We embrace Nordic skiing to promote health and fitness in our long dark winter
months. Having an outlet for our children to ski in high school is important to us. As a tax payer, father, and skiier
please vote yes this week.
Yours truly
Josh riff
From:Kat
To:Edina Mail; jarvinen@aol.com
Subject:Braemar Park Snow Making
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:32:40 PM
To Whom it May Concern,
This message is to voice support for the study and ultimate funding of nordic ski trails and snow making at Braemar
Park in Edina.
Last winter my daughter, Delaney Drefs, went out for nordic skiing for the first time. It was an amazing experience
for her. The Nordic ski team is developing into one of the premier teams in the state of Minnesota. This is a result
of dedicated coaches and a practice facility at the high school which allows athletes to train consistently.
Unfortunately, the Edina Nordic team will be losing much of the current practice space that they currently use.
Construction at the high school will take some of their current trails. The Nine Mile Creek project will take
additional prime ski hills when it gets built. In order for the team to continue to develop into a first tier program,
they must have access to ski trails which allow them to train. The snow making efforts at the high school have been
commendable, but without the use of Braemar, the team may not be competitive. The alternative is 1 practice slot
per week at Hyland Park. This is not enough!
The Edina School system is top notch. The academic curriculum is some of the best in the country. The thing that
sets Edina students apart is their participation in programs such as Nordic skiing. With 200+ students who
participate in nordic skiing, it seems that the continued development of nordic skiing trails and snow making should
be a priority.
Please contact me if you would like to discuss our family’s experience in the Nordic skiing program. 612-805-
2973.
Best regards.
Kat Drefs/Delaney Drefs - Class of 2020
From:mendelco
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Nordic Ski Trails at Braemar
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:35:09 PM
Dear Edina City Council,
We are writing to you to show our support for the ski trails at Braemar. It was brought to our attention that there will be a vote tomorrow night, and we want you to vote YES. We have had two daughters that have competed on the Nordic ski team at Edina High School. We need MORE sports that kids can participate in that are "no cut" sports. It is wonderful that Edina wins so many state titles, but that only includes a fraction of our
student body. For Edina to be great, we need ALL students to find a place to belong and
participate. The Nordic ski team is one of those places. Please make your vote count for both those kids that want to win a Nordic State title as well as those who just want to get exercise in the winter with a great group of kids.
Building ski trails at Braemar is absolutely critical for the very future of the Edina Nordic Ski Team because we are losing most of our current 5km of practice space at the high school. New construction at the high school, going on right now, has already eliminated almost a kilometer of our trails and next summer we will lose two more kilometers and
lose our best hills, as the Nine Mile Creek Trail gets built. We have the 3rd largest sport at Edina High School, with nearly 200 athletes. We simply will not have enough space for the team to practice anymore. As our climate warms, we can no longer count on natural snow to fall when we need it, and fall deep enough to cover most natural ski trails
in the area. Making snow works, but there just isn’t enough of it to go around. We only get about 1 practice slot at Hyland Park each week. We can’t be competitive with only one on-snow practice a week.
We are skeptical that you actually listen to requests from voters. The closing of Fred Richards left us disillusioned with how this city is run and where its priorities lie. Please show us with a yes vote that what is best for our kids (not what is best for developers) is still our #1 priority.
Thank you,
Nancy and Rob Mendel
From:Anne Hinrichs
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Please vote YES to approve ski trails at Braemar!
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:36:47 PM
Dear City Council members,
I know you are voting tomorrow about the possibility of adding snowmaking and Nordic trail
grooming at Braemar. I hope you will support this initiative. I am one of several Edina Nordic ski
coaches and I have two daughters on the team. We have a very large program, 198 skiers were
registered this past season (7th – 12th grade boys and girls). Until now we have been able to ski
right at EHS. Due to several changes in the Nine Mile Creek trail and the EHS expansion, this
opportunity will soon be lessened significantly. We would welcome the opportunity to ski at nearby
Braemar! Although Hyland Park Reserve has trails, teams are only given approximately one
practice time slot each week. We typically train 5-6 times each week.
In addition to the Edina Nordic team, there are many other Edina residents that would utilize these
Braemar ski trails. It would be a great way to get people to see Braemar and Tin Fish as year round
destinations! Nordic skiing is definitely gaining in popularity and appeals to a broad spectrum of
people.
I know it is difficult to know where resources should be allocated. Edina clearly considers our youth
as a priority. Keeping our youth active and outside is beneficial to their physical and mental health.
Clearly we are doing something right when we have so many students sign up for Nordic. Please
support our efforts to have nearly 200 adolescents getting some fresh air on skis after school!
Thanks!
Anne Hinrichs
p.s. This past season was the most successful season we’ve had in about 30 years! Our girls’
team (top 7) went to the State Meet and finished in 9th place. We also had 2 boys qualify for
State as individuals. On the other end of the spectrum we taught 97 beginners how to ski this
year! It’s a diverse, enormous and successful program! Please support us by giving us a place to
practice. Thank you!
From:Elizabeth Burnett
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Cross country ski trails at Braemar
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:41:02 PM
Dear City Council,
I ask you to vote in favor of the ski trails proposed at Braemar. These trails are essential to the
Edina High School Nordic ski team, as the team is losing trails to construction and the Nine Mile Creek project. This team is a wonderful asset to the Edina school system, as it is one of
the only sports with no cuts. Also, kids from 7th to 12th grade can participate, making it a wonderful opportunity for both middle and high school students to stay in shape while also
gaining a lifetime sport. I have two kids currently on the team and another on the way next year, and it's essential to for the team to have the Braemar trails to maintain the vitality of the
team.
These trails would also be a tremendous asset to the community by providing a convenient, accessible way for citizens of all ages to ski. Let's keep both our kids and adults healthy and
active by making these trails available to all!
Thank you for your support,Elizabeth Burnett
From:Jarvinen
To:James Hovland
Subject:Braemar Winter Recreatoin Project
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:47:33 PM
Good Evening Mayor!
I am writing on behalf of the Edina Nordic Ski Team as a coach, as parent of a
Nordic skier, as a Nordic skier myself, and as a resident of Edina. Within
the last 24 hours, it has come to my attention that the Braemar Winter
Recreation project has been put on hold and unless an additional approval is
voted up tomorrow, the project will likely terminate. I am very concerned
about moving this project forward and I am hoping we might be able to talk
before the meeting to figure out some way to make this project attractive to
all council members. Could we modify the project, raise other funds, look for
more revenue, etc?
This project is absolutely essential for the future of the Edina Nordic Ski
Team. If it fails, how will we be able to support our 200 athletes every day
at practice? Where will we be able to practice? We are the 3rd largest sport
at Edina high school. 10% of all Edina High School Students are on this team!
This is a very significant sports program. We do not cut, meaning that all
students can join if they want. The problem is that we are losing our
practice space at the high school due to new school construction and with the
development of the 9 mile creek trail. All our hopes are now with Braemar. We
will not have any place to practice on snow every day without it. If we can't
be on snow, our program will surely suffer and we will give up the huge gains
we have enjoyed over the last 6 years. I don't think many will want to join
the team if they will only be able to ski on snow one or two times a week,
and we certainly will suffer competitively.
Please let me know you have some time to talk.
Craig Jarvinen
612-747-1677
From:Deb Carlson
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Please vote yes for the Nordic Trails Project at Braemar
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:55:07 PM
Please vote yes to support the Nordic ski trails project at Braemar. The loss of the ski trails at
the high school over the next year will have a significant negative impact on the continued success of the Edina High School Nordic team. We are building momentum and have an
opportunity to see both the boys and girls teams heading to state in the coming years. This is only possible if training can take place regularly on groomed trails. There is a great deal of
interest in the sport by other members of the community as well. Investment at Braemar can only be seen as a positive for our community.
Sincerely,
Deb Carlson
Edina Nordic Parent
From:Paul Arbisi
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Ski Trails at Braemer Park with snow making.
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 9:55:47 PM
Edina City Council Members,
I am writing in strong support of funding for development of nordic ski trails at Braemar Park. I am a 22 year
Edina resident and an avid runner, biker, and nordic skier. I served as a parent coach of the Edina Nordic Ski
Team when my daughter attended Edina High School and was able to observe how important participation in a life-
long sport such as Nordic skiing was to the physical and emotional development of adolescent boys and girls.
With nearly 200 middle and high school students joining the Edina Nordic Team each year exercise habits are
being laid down that will persist through adulthood leading to heathy and productive citizens.
Unfortunately, the climate has become less predictable and access to skiable trails limited due to increasingly
common warm and snowless winters. Providing a reliable venue for nordic skiing in the City of Edina is essential
in order to promote winter aerobic activity to a wide age range of Edina residents from pre-schoolers to retired
grandparents. As someone who exercises outdoors year round and who is approaching retirement age, I look
forward to being able to exercise regularly throughout the year by running, biking or skiing on the trails at Braemar.
Again, I strongly encourage you to vote to approve development of ski trails at Braemar Park that include snow
making.
Regards,
Paul A. Arbisi, Ph.D.
From:Mark Bixby
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Strong Support for Braemar Park Ski Trail Development
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 10:00:53 PM
Dear Edina City Council,
As an Edina resident for the past 23 years I want to voice my strong support for development
of the Braemar Park ski trails, including snow making.
Our high school ski team needs a place to practice. The team is losing much of its
practice area at the high school due to needed construction, but without local trails our ski team will be limited to one on-snow practice each week - not nearly enough to be
competitive. Other local areas with snow-making are over-used and our kids cannot get sufficient time on snow. Nordic skiing is the third largest sport at Edina High School
with nearly 200 athletes competing each season. With warming temperatures, snow conditions are not coming early enough and not
staying long enough without snow-making. BUT with snow making, we can have great conditions from the start of December (maybe earlier) through the middle of March.
Cross country skiing is a life-long sport that can engage kids even before elementary school all the way through the 8th decade and beyond. It is one of the best aerobic
sports known. In this era of increasing obesity and increasingly sedentary life styles, cross country is a great way for our community members to be active outdoors, in the
winter, doing something that's good for them, and good for the community.
I urge you as our representatives to take this important step in maintaining the vitality of Edina
and support Braemar Park ski trail development, including snow-making.
Thank you - Mark Bixby 4600 France Ave S
Edina(612) 867-4687
From:John Horns
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemer Nordic Center with artifical snow capability
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 10:06:01 PM
Hello Edina City Council,
Please vote yes for the move to build nordic trails with artificial snow making capability at Braemer
park. This resource will benefit the Edina community as well as the broader nordic community in the
Twin Cities. Building ski trails at Braemar is also critical for the future of the Edina Nordic Ski Team. The
team is losing most of our current 5km of practice space at the high school because of the new
construction and the building of the Nine Mile Creek Trail. The Nordic program is the 3rd larges sport at
the Edina High School with nearly 200 athletes. We will not have enough space for the team to practice
anymore. Because of climate change, we can no longer count on natural snowfall to consistently cover
the local ski trails. Making artificial snow works, but there isn’t enough of it to go around. Currently
we get 1 practice slot at Hyland Park each week. We can’t be competitive with this practice schedule.
Thank you for your attention on this issue. Think snow!
John Horns
6101 Jeffrey Lane
Edina, MN 55436
From:Rhoda Bernstein
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Ski Trails at Braemar
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 10:19:35 PM
Hi,
I was excited to learn that Edina city council had voted to design and study building ski trails
at Braemar Park with snow making. I was disappointed to learn that in the last week or so, other priorities have risen to the top, and the council put a hold on further development of the
Braemar Park ski trails until 6/21.
I am writing to urge the council to vote in favor of this project. Building ski trails at Braemar is in the best interest of our community. If we are to encourage and promote lifetime year-
round activities, having ski trails in our community is essential. Nordic skiing is one of the few winter activities that all ages can enjoy together.
It is also absolutely critical for the future of the Edina HS Nordic Ski Program. With
construction of the Nine Mile Creek trail, we are losing most of the existing 5km of practice space at the high school. New construction at the high school has already eliminated almost a
kilometer of trails and next summer, we will lose two more kilometers and lose the best hills, as the Nine Mile Creek Trail is completed..
The Nordic Ski program is the 3rd largest sport at Edina High School, with nearly 200
athletes. They will not have enough space for the team to practice and we will be faced with traveling to county parks WHEN we can get practice slots. Currently, we only get about 1
practice slot at Hyland Park each week. We can’t be competitive with only one on-snow practice a week.
For these reasons I ask that the city council expedite planning and funding ski trails with snow
making at Braemar.
Respectfully,
Rhoda BernsteinRhodabernstein@msn.com
952.393.3773
Sent from my mobile phone...please excuse any typos.
From:Ben
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar Skiing Trails
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 10:46:58 PM
Hi council members, my name is Ben Brandt and I'll be a senior next year at EHS. I've been on the Nordic Ski team
for 4 years and I'll be a captain in the upcoming season.
As you know, most of the Nordic trails that we use to train and practice on will be destroyed by the ongoing
construction and athletic facilities being built around the lower fields. Without being able to practice right by our
school, having a practice facility at Braemar would help our teams by leaps and bounds. If we don't have this at
braemar, the only place that we'll be able to practice at is Hylands in Bloomington where we can only get 1 practice
slot per week, we have to pay to practice there, it is 20 minuets away, and it is extremely difficult to get the entire
team there. Allowing this referendum to pass would give our team a great practice area where we can continue our
state-wide reputation as an extremely successful program.
Nordic Skiing is the 3rd biggest sport at the high school with more than 200 people on the team. It would just be
impossible for everyone to squeeze into the now tiny lower fields, but having a snow making loop nearby would be
incredible for our team.
Personally, Nordic skiing has had the biggest impact than anything else on my high school career. I've met all or my
friends by skiing through the woods training for upcoming races, and losing this area is devastating for our team
and also for me.
Skiing by the high school is an incredible thing, to be exercising outside in the Minnesota winter, but construction
ruins the whole experience. And while the construction is no doubt needed, I think that a skiing loop at braemar is
also needed.
Thank you for reading this, and I hope you will take this into consideration before the vote.
From:Nancy Sinykin
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar Park Ski Trails Development project
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 10:54:20 PM
Hello,
We are requesting that you vote yes to develop the Braemar Park Ski Trails and snow making.
We would like to see Nordic Ski continue in Edina for our students. With over 200 kids involved in the Nordic ski program, it is important that you vote yes. We would like to see
the Nordic Ski program continue in Edina. If you don't vote yes, the kids will no longer be able to practice and the program may not continue. Please vote Yes on this project. Our
middle school and high school kids would love for this program to continue.
Thanks,
The Sinykins
From:Karlen Family
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar ski trails
Date:Monday, June 20, 2016 11:29:50 PM
I am writing in support of Edina investing in the development of Nordic ski trails at Braemar. It would be a fantastic
addition to our already strong options for community and family recreation. Please vote yes to Nordic ski trails at
Braemar!
The Karlen family
6704 Samuel Road
aokfamilymn@gmail.com
Sent from my iPhone
From:Katherine Chamberlain
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar Nordic Ski Trails
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 12:21:55 AM
City council members,
My name is Kate Chamberlain. I am a recent graduate of edina high school, and a three-year member of the edina
nordic ski team.
Over the years, I have come to love nordic ski, as it is not only a great way to workout and a competitive in a sport,
but it has also been a place where I can meet new people and have fun with my teammates. I have enjoyed skiing
the edina trails at the high school. There, skiers of all levels have the freedom to ski and be coached on our own
trails. Having our own trails has been such a blessing, as it allows for more team bonding than you would expect.
Wether its encouraging a teammate to push it to the top of the hill, or starting a game of ice rink boot soccer after
practice, having the team all together in one place has allowed me to meet kids of different age levels and abilities
actually interact with them, getting to know them and form lasting relationships. Teams who only practice at
highlands generally have to separate into groups, and don’t get to see people other than those in their ski group.
This is ok if you are just in it to win the races, but when you look back on your high school days, do you actually
think of the accomplishments you got? Or do you think of the fun you had meeting new people and the lasting
relationships that you made? The other problem with practicing at highlands, as my former coaches provably
already told you, is that we would only get a practice slot once a week, making it impossible to have a competitive
team.
I am no longer on the team, I graduated last year. If you didn’t build the trails at Braemar, it would only affect me in
that I would not have the convenience of my parents house being a short car drive of the trails. However, it would
break my heart that my former teammates and future generations of skiers would no longer have the opportunity to
bond with their teammates, all 200 of them, in the same way that I had the privilege to. It would also be difficult to
see a team that could be great in a few more years instead be stunted because they were deprived of a place to train
and develop competitive young skiers.
Not to mention that nordic skiing is a great winter family activity that gets people outside in the cold months and is
for people of all ages. It’s hard to be against it, and being active can only be good for a community.
Please approve show making at highlands.
Thank you for your time (and hopefully vote).
regardless I appreciate what you do,
Kate Chamberlain
Edina Highschool Class of 2016
From:Paul Zdechlik
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar ski trail-please vote yes!
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 5:55:02 AM
Hello,
Please support the Braemar cross country ski trail. We have two kids on the EHS Nordic team and a
10 year old who loves the sport and wants to be on the team in a few years. The EHS team is over 200 kids and growing every year! Without this new trail being built, there will virtually be no reasonable place to practice.
It is hard to find ways to keep kids active during the winter and this ski trail not only supports the team but also the whole community of Edina. As a family of five, we ski in the winter at the high school and it is a great, inexpensive family activity. We often see other families out there as well
using the ski trails.
Please vote yes.
Thank you,
Paul Zdechlik
From:Tom Rock
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar Ski Trails
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 7:22:56 AM
I write in support of the proposal to study the feasibility of constructing ski trails at Braemar. My family has been
skiing in the metro area for years, and two of my children have been members of the Edina High School Nordic Ski
Team. Adding ski trails to Braemar would be a low cost, low maintenance way to make wonderful year-round use
of Braemar golf course and the ski trails would be used by a huge number of Edina residents. In addition, the
completion of the Nine Mile Creek bike and pedestrian trail will essentially render the ski trail at Edina High
School unusable. Please vote in favor of continuing the study of this very important project.
From:Laura and Jim Rubin
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Building Nordic Ski Trails at Braemar
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 7:46:12 AM
Dear City Council:
I understand that the City Council is contemplating building Nordic Ski Trails at Braemar. I
want to speak out in support of the idea.
We are long time Edina residents with four kids in the school district. We are proud to be
living here and are very active in the community and schools. Nordic skiing is one such
activity our entire family is engaged in. Three of our four kids have already been active in
Edina Nordic skiing and the fourth will start in a couple of years. As parents we also engage in
Nordic skiing to stay healthy. Currently there are no good places for our family to Nordic ski
in the city of Edina. Adding trails at Braemar would provide families and Edina schools with
yet another excellent outdoor activity to enjoy.
Please consider adding Nordic Ski trails as another way to distinguish our already awesome
inner city suburb!
From:Zdechlik, Mary J
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Please support Nordic ski trails at Braemar!
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 7:57:34 AM
Hello!
Please support Nordic ski trails at Braemar! The city of Edina is in need of more winter sport options,
a chance to get outside in winter, great exercise! Because of the construction at HS, they are losing
much of their practice area. This is one of the largest sports team at Edina, and teaches kids a
lifelong, healthy skill- skiing!
Thank you!
Mary Zdechlik
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/orproprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intendedrecipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail isprohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
From:Mosborg, Carri A
To:Edina Mail
Cc:Carri Ann Mosborg; Amanda Grace Mosborg; smosborg@gmail.com; "ahinrichs@msn.com"
Subject:Ski Trails & Snowmaking at Braemar - YES!
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:20:36 AM
Dear Edina City Council Members:
I am writing (again) to say I wholeheartedly support this proposal and hope that
it is approved. While a death in the family made it necessary for us to move
from Edina to Bloomington last summer, my daughter still attends Edina High
School (senior this fall) and participates in varsity track, cross country and
Nordic. She was one of the team members who competed at the State Nordic
meet last year (you may know that it was the first time the Edina girls team
had qualified for State in several decades).
I am aware of the amount of ski trails near Edina High School that will be lost as
a result of construction at Nine Mile Creek, etc., and that is worrisome. New
trails and snowmaking at Braemar would be a wonderfully positive addition to
the community and help keep our teens involved in healthy
activity/competition. Please vote “yes” to move this project forward.
Thank you for your consideration and all that you do!
Carri Mosborg
Executive Assistant • Allina Health Group
Phone: 612-262-5204 • Fax: 612-262-4091 • carri.mosborg@allina.com
Mail Route 10307 • 2925 Chicago Avenue • Minneapolis, MN 55407-1321
Executive Assistant to:
Earl Beitzel, Vice President, Finance & Business Development
Finance Directors: Kim Dembsky, Steve Drake, Bob Peterson, Diane Soderstrom
C. Alan Steed, PhD, Clinical Director & Regional Lead Clinician, Allina Health Mental Health and
Addiction Services
Coordinator for:
Primary Care Operations Meeting (PCOM)
Primary Care Lead Clinicians Meeting
This message contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose
to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message.
From:Darren Ruschy
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar cross country ski trails - please vote yes
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:40:23 AM
As a resident of Edina, cross-country skier and father of a member of the Edina cross-country ski
team, I am asking you to vote yes tonight to move the snow-making trail project at Braemar Park
forward. Cross-country skiers depend on two things to enjoy their sport – snow and proper
grooming of ski trails. The last two winters have resulted in little natural snow. This resulted in
skiers packing the man-made trails at Hyland in Bloomington or Elm Creek Park in Maple Grove.
Furthermore, practice time at either of these places is limited to one practice slot a week for high
school skiers. Furthermore, the snow making at the High School that the team has relied upon is
basically withering away due to the construction at the High School and the extension of the Nine
Mile Creek trail. We can do better.
By voting yes tonight, you are ensuring good snow and proper grooming for the Edina High School
ski team, citizen skiers of Edina and people from surrounding communities. Edina has a long-
standing tradition of doing the right thing for its residents. Please continue that tradition by
supporting the Braemar Park snow making project tonight.
Regards,
Darren Ruschy
612-840-6070
From:Johnson, Gary
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Ski trails at Braemar
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:49:45 AM
Dear City Council,
I am writing in strong support of putting snow making capabilities in at Braemar. This is essential for
our community. We are losing our trails at the high school. There are over 200 students on the
Edina Nordic team. They only get to ski at Hyland once per week. This is essential for the team.
And also for the community. Nordic skiing is an inexpensive, family activity. This is a long winter in
MN. Our community needs access to these trails in the winter. Please support this.
Thank you,
Gary
Gary R. Johnson
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | Vice-President & Treasurer
“Distinctive Solutions for Enclosing Commercial Buildings and Framing Art”
4400 West 78th Street, Suite 520, Minneapolis, MN 55435
Tel: 952-487-7542 | gjohnson@apog.com
www.apog.com
The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments is proprietary and intended only for the
confidential use of the designated recipient named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify us immediately at the e-mail
address listed above. Thank you.
From:slebakken@gmail.com on behalf of Sue Lebakken
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Nordic ski trails at Braemar Park
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 9:01:47 AM
City council members,
Edina's high school Nordic team is in desperate need of your time and attention to the addition
of ski trails at Braemar Park. Our daughter is entering 10th grade and looks forward to being part of some exciting years with the talented girls' team that is in line for a possible state title
in the next few years. But they need a place to practice. The high school construction, warmer winters and competition for snow at Hyland is going to make it tough for the team,
the coaches and the parents to find places to practice for the team.
Please vote yes to keep the plan moving forward for ski trails at Braemar Park. Regards,
Sue Lebakken, parent
From:Bruce Freeman
To:Edina Mail
Cc:ted youel; Ted Youel; Rich Jahnke; Ann Kattreh
Subject:Nordic ski trails and tubing meeting tonight
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 9:18:04 AM
I just found out there is a meeting tonight to discuss Nordic ski trails and tubing at Braemar and possibly
approve a feasibility study. While I support Nordic ski and tubing, I am extremely concerned
and upset that this one initiative for one sport could move ahead while the mtn biking community has
been told repeatedly that no work can proceed until there is a master plan for Braemar which is waiting
for funding to even start the planning process. However many people you have supporting Nordic skiing,
which again the mtn biking community would support and is good, I can easily guarantee we can get
twice the number of people at a meeting to support mtn biking at Braemar.
I have three major concerns:
One, that the city council truly understands the incredible amazing, unbelievable, fantastic, and unusual
terrain we have at Braemar for mtn biking. We are so lucky compared to other cities in having this
special unique terrain even available for consideration. Plus we want to use terrain that nobody else
wants, the sides of hills. Mtn biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the country and also the
absolute very cheapest to create with almost zero maintenance costs.
Two, that the mountain biking community is kept fully aware of any new planned use of terrain at Braemar
so we can work together to make sure both uses are not compromised. There is a very specific plan
ready for consideration of Braemar that creates a circular trail system around the entire park.
Three, we the mtn biking community have been repeatedly told that no preliminary planning of any kind
can be done until the Braemar master plan process begins which is still waiting for funding to even begin
so we are very disturbed that one sport is potentially getting the go ahead while we have to wait. We
want to be included in any discussion of land use at Braemar to ensure that one use does not preclude
the use of mtn biking. If one sport can jump ahead of us we will be mobilizing our supporters and
demanding that we should also be a part of an early feasibility study.
A mtn biking trail system at Braemar would be a fantastic community asset at a fraction of normal
recreational facilities cost whose maintenance is done solely by volunteers of that community. The mtn
biking community demands that we should have a right to state our case before the council to be
considered in an early feasibility study along with Nordic skiing. We have not come forward up til now
because we have been repeatedly told by Ann Katreh head of parks and rec that no sport can move
forward until the Braemar master plan begins, yet here Nordic skiing is being considered ahead of all
other sports. Why is that? If we make enough noise will we be able to move forward as well? We will
not stand for this injustice and demand that mtn biking be considered along with Nordic skiing to protect
the future land use of Braemar for mtn biking.
From:Ellen Jones
To:Edina Mail; Bob Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Ann Swenson; James Hovland
Subject:Say YES to Braemar Nordic Trails!
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 9:25:12 AM
Dear Honorable Mayor James Hovland and City Council:
I am writing to ask that you give Parks staff direction to proceed with the Braemar Winter Recreation Area design,
feasibility study and bid documents.
If Council decides to stop this initiative, it will mean that the 200 member Nordic Ski Team will have no appropriate
place to train.
The City is allowing Three Rivers Park District with its Nine Mile Creek Trail to destroy the trail system that the
Nordic Team spent years developing. The ski team will have no where else to practice once the Nine Mile trail is
built, the Nine Mile trail is not skiable!
In my six years on the Edina Park Board, I have never encountered the Parks Department relinquishing land used for
one sport, without providing a reasonable alternative location.
Just a few years ago, the Nordic Team sought and obtained approval by the City to create trails on the parkland by
the high school. The Nordic Ski Team invested over $30,000 in snow making and grooming equipment and has
given hours serving the community by making snow and grooming the trails that will be destroyed by the Nine
Mile trail. That trails network built by the team will be reduced from about 5 km down to about 1 km after the Nine
Mile trail goes through. These trails have been open to the public and enjoyed by many Edina residents of all ages.
Consider what would happen if you asked football, lacrosse, baseball or soccer parents to level, mow, stripe and
irrigate their own practice fields, as Nordic has done to create their training trails? And, after they have created a
field, destroy it — leaving them with NO place to practice. What seismic display would be in Council Chambers? I
have seen what expressions of protest just changing the hours of practice for swimming and hockey brought out
from our community.
While Nordic skiers are pretty nice people, who probably won’t send you letters full of nasty bits, please don’t
disregard us because of it. Actually, please consider building the trails because you would like Nordic skiers to
come to Edina, you’d like more of us hard-working, non-complaining, physically fit folks in town!
If you want even more reasons to pursue next steps for the Braemar Winter Recreation Area, here they are:
There is no other place this team can practice. Three Rivers Parks will not allow any team to practice more than one
day per week at their facilities.
The Nordic Ski Team currently is among the top three largest teams at the high school along with cross country and
track. The Nordic Ski Team has over 200 skiers and 11 coaches. It offers a spot on the team for every skill level —
with top state finishers most years and also many novices in this non-cut sport.
The Nordic Ski Team emphasizes social equity by welcoming all interested skiers with a ski equipment rental
program, free for skiers with financial needs and affordable for all first time skiers. This creates a much needed
welcoming, healthy after-school sport and recreational activity serving youth in the entire community.
Nordic skiing is an endurance sport, needing hills and kilometers to appropriately train. No other city park nor
school property offers the combination of terrain and distance as is possible at Braemar.
Providing opportunities for residents to recreate all year long is something that makes cities premier places to live.
Edina has an opportunity with this project to make Braemar a cluster of winter activity, with each component
building off of the other to create a place that creates community.
Edina residents have asked for more trails. It is the top item mentioned on the Community Needs Survey. Edina
residents have also asked for nature trails. This is another top item on the Community Needs Survey. These trails
can be used by the general public and can be used year round.
The Nordic community is not asking for an off-season training facility, as is provided by the city for other youth
sports with the Braemar sports and golf domes. Nor is it asking for a year-round training facility, as the city
provides hockey and swimming with the Arena and Edinborough pool. The Nordic community is also not asking to
upgrade and staff warming houses in all local parks and provide groomed trails in these local parks. Some youth
sports are truly over served in this city. Nordic is asking Edina if it could just continue to provide at least one place
to train IN SEASON.
Nordic skiing is a popular, life long sport with skiers of all ages participating and bringing families together for
outdoor activity.
The current trails at Braemar are in need of maintenance to stop further erosion and maintain their safety. This
project will create safe and sustainable year-round trails.
Please direct staff to continue with design and feasibility of the Braemar Winter Recreation Area.
Sincerely,
Ellen Jones
From:Judith Brumfield
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Mountain Biking at Braemar
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 9:48:27 AM
Please give serious consideration to developing a mountain biking opportunity in an
undeveloped area of Braemar. A growing number of young residents are developing skills in this positive recreational activity. A dedicated area would encourage healthy activity while
not interfering with other uses.
Judith Brumfield5301 Pinewood Trail
Edina
From:Jen Kompelien
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Snow making at Braemar
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 10:04:51 AM
Please, please, please support snow making at Braemar. The EHS Nordic team is one of the
most positive experiences the high school has to offer for SO MANY kids- 200! We need your support to create a place they can ski given all the changes at the high school that are ruining
our trails.
Thank you!!!
Jen
Jennifer Kompelien
Open Dynamics, Inc.
www.opendynamics.com
p 952.920.8045
jen@opendynamics.com
_________________________
accelerating business growth and development
voice of client | strategic planning | team development
From:Jan Guenther
To:Edina Mail
Subject:FW: trials in Edina
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 10:26:36 AM
From: Jan Guenther [mailto:gearwest@gearwest.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 10:26 AM
To: 'mailto:mail@edinamn.gov' <mailto:mail@edinamn.gov>
Cc: 'mattl@gearwest.com' <mattl@gearwest.com>
Subject: trials in Edina
The Edina Nordic team has been and can continue to be one of the largest and best ski teams in the
metro area. And, the only way for the team to flourish is through dedicated coaching (which it has)
AND reasonable access to good skiing and close skiing.
Building trails in Braemar will allow the kids to ski! And when kids ski, they stay with the sport and as
anyone who studies the statistics of HS skier, you know that the very best students chose to ski.
These kids are who the HS wants-- intelligent, focused, and clean of drugs. Their athletic ski interests
bring so much back to the school of Edina. Please vote yes for such a healthy and simple way of
supporting 200+ kids of Edina.
Sincerely, Jan
Jan GuentherOwnerGear West Ski & BikeGear West Alpine & Casual763-458-5834
From:Craig Brandt
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Request for City Council members -- Please support funding for a Nordic ski trail at Braemar
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:04:59 AM
I am a long-time Edina resident, who has a son that is active on the Edina high school cross country
ski team. This team is extremely popular and it provides a healthy, outdoor exercise opportunity for
literally hundreds of high school kids each year. The team is thriving and growing.
The team HAS for years USED A PRACTICE TRAIL IN AND Around TE HIGH SCHOOL AND Creek Valley
school properties, but much of that trail is being lost due to the high school construction project and
the new bike trail that is being constructed.
I think it would be a very smart move for the health and attractiveness of Edina to its citizens if a
cross country ski trail were developed on the Braemar property. What a wonderful and low cost
way for the city to promote the health of its citizens by providing such a trail for public use. Such a
trail would also be actively used by the Edina HS program. This type of training trail is needed for
that program to continue on its outstanding growth path.
Such at trail would also allow Edina citizens to benefit from the huge Braemar property during the six
months of each year when it cannot be used for golf. As far as I can tell now, that facility is
essentially unused for half of each year.
I strongly urge the city council to allocate funding for this initiative. Thanks,
Craig Brandt
6524 Nordic Drive
From:Andrea L Brandt
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Ski trails
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:10:05 AM
Please consider voting to support ski trails at Braemar. Our middle son will be a co-captain next year and is very
dedicated to the sport. Our oldest son skied on the team, too, before graduating from EHS.
Having two kids in this sport, I have been able to appreciate all that this sport provides for kids at such a formative
time. Besides incredible excercise, it creates a love and appreciation of the outdoors.
Given the huge number of kids in the program, I believe the team contributes to a generation that will learn to love
the outdoors and be good stewards of our planet when they are adults.
The team needs a place to practice. We are losing our trails at EHS. Please vote to create some trails (and snow
making ability) so these kids have a place to ski in years to come.
Thanks for reading!
Andrea
From:andyt@hoigaards.com
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Braemar Project
Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 11:29:55 AM
I am writing you in support of the proposed Braemar Winter Project. While I understand that this is not an
inexpensive undertaking it is a project that has the potential to provide year round recreational opportunities in an
underutilized portion of Braemar. As a ski coach and skier and Edina resident the availability of ski trails in my
community is a great community amenity. There are also potential recreational uses for these trails in non winter
months which would also be a benefit.
Please consider the long range impact of this project as you meet this evening.
Andy Turnbull
Coach Edina HS Nordic Ski Team
5437 Halifax Ln
Edina 55424
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: B.1.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Minutes
From:Jackie Hoogenakker, Planning Support
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes: Planning Commission Meeting April 27,
2016
Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None
INTRODUCTION:
Please find attached April 27, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Planning Commission April 27, 2016 Minutes
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/25/2016
1
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Planning Commission
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
4801 West 50th Street
April 27, 2016, 7:00 P.M.
I. Call To Order
Chair Platteter called the meeting to order at 7:02 P.M.
II. Roll Call
Answering the roll call were: Chair Platteter, Commissioners Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss,
Nemerov, Olsen Carr, Hamilton, and Student Commissioners Kivimaki and Ma. Staff present:
Community Development Director Teague, Assistant Planner, Aaker, Senior Planner Repya and
Support Staff Hoogenakker
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Commissioner Hobbs suggested a change to the Agenda to allow the requested variance for
Thomas and Shannon Leach, 5526 to be heard first.
Motion to approve amending the Agenda as stated was made by Thorsen. Motion
seconded by Strauss. Motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Commissioners Lee and Nemerov requested changes to the minutes. Motion was made by
Commissioner Thorsen to approve the minutes of the April 13, 2016 Planning Commission
meeting with the changes suggested by Lee and Nemerov. Motion was seconded by
Strauss. All voted aye; motion carried.
V. Public Hearings
B. Lot width variance for 5526 Interlachen Boulevard for Thomas and Shannon Leach
Planner Presentation
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/25/2016
2
Planner Aaker reported that the property is a vacant “neck lot” located on the north side of
Interlachen Boulevard and backing up to a ponding area. The property was subdivided in 1952
and has been vacant since subdivision. The ordinance requires a single dwelling unit lot to consist of no
less than 75 feet in width, (as measured 50 feet back from the front lot line). The subject property is
30 feet in lot width, 50 feet back from the front lot line and is 67,601 square feet in area.
Planner Aaker noted the lot provides a 30-foot lot width, adding a 45 foot lot width variance is
required to allow a new home to be built on the lot. There is no evidence that variances were
granted as part of subdivision, so presumably the plat met city requirements at the time of division. A
majority of the lot far exceeds the lot width, depth and area requirements, however, where the width
is measured per ordinance definition is too narrow. The property owner is hoping to construct a new
two story home on the main, (larger) part of the lot . The house will conform to all zoning
requirements including height, setback and coverage.
Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends Recommend that the Planning Commission approve
the variance based on the following findings:
1) With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and
ordinances for the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District.
2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because:
a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is consistent with existing conditions.
3) The imposed lot width by definition does not allow redevelopment of the property without the
benefit of a variance.
Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions:
1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below:
• Site Plan date stamped April 5, 2016.
• Building plans and elevations date stamped: April 5, 2016.
• Approval of a revised grading, drainage, storm water management and erosion control plan by
the Engineering Department prior to building permit issuance.
• Approval of a final tree placement plan by the City Forester prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
• Site must comply with the City’s tree ordinance.
Appearing for the Applicant
Thomas and Shannon Leach
Applicant Comments
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/25/2016
3
Mr. Leach addressed the Commission and explained their desire is to build a family home. Leach said
he reached out to his neighbors and informed them of their plans. Leach further explained that he will
work with neighbors on tree and landscaping placement during the construction process and after the
new home is built. Continuing, Leah said the site was cleared of buckthorn, Cotton Wood and Aspen,
adding he worked with an arborist on tree preservation and replacement. Leach asked Commissioners
for their support.
Chair Platteter raised a question if a new house is built on a vacant lot is it required to comply with
the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative. She noted the
City Forrester reviewed the applicants tree preservation plan and in his judgement determined the
requirements and replacement procedures Commissioners further noted that during the construction
process attention needs to be paid to the trees root system. Mr. Leach was asked the width of the
new driveway and the size of the new trees. Mr. Leach said the driveway is proposed at around 12-
feet and trees are proposed at a 2 ½ diameter at breast height. Leach stressed that they would
comply with all Code requirements.
Discussion
Commissioners expressed the following:
• A question was raised on when the ordinance was changed to require a 75-foot lot width, and if
in Edina there are other “flag type lots”. Planner Aaker responded that she believes the
ordinance was changed sometime in the 1970’s, adding there are a number of “flag” or “neck”
lots within the City. Aaker further noted that the ordinance also requires that a lot must have
30-feet of frontage on an improved street, which this one does.
• It was pointed out that any change/increase in water runoff would need to be mitigated.
Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative and introduced Charlie Gerk, with the Engineering
Department to speak on water management.
Charlie Gerk addressed the Commission and said this area was carefully studied. Gerk said the City
does not want an increase in runoff to private property or the pond to the east adding there are a
number of ways to accommodate the excess water. Continuing, he noted a rain garden or ponding
area could be implemented on the site; adding the “area” required would be approximately 20 X 20 and
1-foot deep. Gerk said a revised grading plan for the western low point of the site would need to be
reviewed prior to issuance of a building permit.
A discussion ensued on the water management options with Gerk explaining that in working together
with the applicant a satisfactory storm water management plan can be implemented. He said the goal
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/25/2016
4
was to ensure adequate water management for a 1 1/2 –inch rainfall. Gerk said he believes a 2 inch per
hour perk rate was needed. Gerk further noted Cooper pond to the east gathers the water runoff from
a number of lots and in the past if the pond was full the City would pump it out. Gerk said the City no
longer pumps out that pond. Again, Gerk explained that all details would be worked out prior to
issuance of a building permit.
• A question was raised regarding the removal of trees noting that trees were removed prior to
the variance request. Planner Aaker explained that a property owner has the right to remove
trees and/or vegetation on their property and that includes vacant lots. Aaker explained the
property owner purchased the property with the intent of building a house. The Tree Ordinance
has a one year “no touch” requirement before a building permit is “pulled”. She concluded the
applicant has submitted a Tree Preservation Plan.
• Commissioners asked the applicant to keep in touch with neighbors during the construction
process. Mr. Leach responded it is his intent to “keep in touch”.
Public Hearing
Chair Platteter opened the public hearing.
Lynn Gulbronson, 5 Cooper, addressed the Commission and reported she has concerns with drainage.
She further noted that the City no longer pumps out “Cooper” pond.
Laurie Swift, 29 Cooper Circle, addressed the Commission and expressed concern that the pond
pumping is no longer being done by the City, adding her concern is also with water runoff.
Marilyn Jasa, 5520 Interlachen Boulevard, asked staff for clarification on the proposed house placement.
Chair Platteter asked if anyone else would like to speak being none, Motion made by Commissioner
Thorsen to close the public hearing. Seconded by Commissioner Carr. Motion carried.
Continued Discussion
Planner Teague was asked for clarification on the Commissions role for the requested variance.
Planner Teague responded that the applicant has requested a variance from the City’s lot width
requirement. Teague stated the role of the Commission is to determine if the subject lot is buildable.
A lot width variance is needed so construction of a new house can occur.
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/25/2016
5
• It was noted that this lot appears to have acted as a watershed for this area and the pond is
critical. It is important to know where the water will go.
• The property owner has the right to construct a house; however the existing homeowners
should not be negatively impacted as a result of new home construction.
• Advise the engineering department to follow this application through the process very carefully.
A successful development of this site is contingent on how the engineering department
monitors the entire process.
• Consider an increase in tree size (2 ½ caliper may be too small) to allow for maximum
absorption, noting some of the trees that were removed were of considerable size. The
buckthorn that was removed was also part of the absorption process in this area. Consider
more landscaping.
Motion
Commissioner Carr commented that overall she believes the house was well placed on
the lot.
Motion was made by Commissioner Carr to approve the 45-foot lot width variance
based on staff finding and subject to staff conditions including the recommendation that
Condition 3, page 5, of the staff report read as follows:
“Approval of a revised grading, drainage, storm water management and erosion control
plan by the Engineering department prior to building permit issue both during
construction and post construction”.
Motion was seconded by Commissioner Thorsen. All voted aye; motion.
Chair Platteter commented that at this time it may be worthwhile for the Engineering Department to
reconsider their policy on pumping “Cooper” pond.
B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Scoreboards at Kuhlman Stadium and Courtney Field
Planner Presentation
Planner Teague reported that Edina Public Schools is requesting an amendment to the City’s Sign
Ordinance to build a new scoreboard at Kuhlman Stadium. The proposed sign is 544 total square feet
in size including the advertising panel (25% allowed). Continuing, Teague explained that the current
Ordinance allows a scoreboard to be no more than 200 square feet and staff recommended that a
Zoning Ordinance Amendment rather than a large Variance request accommodate the new scoreboard.
Planner Teague shared photos of the size of neighboring communities’ school scoreboards:
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/25/2016
6
• Burnsville 1,350 s.f.
• Eden Prairie 1,432 s.f.
• Wayzata 950 s.f.
• Minnetonka 1,000 s.f.
Planner Teague concluded that based on the comparison of similar scoreboards at similar sized schools,
staff recommends the Ordinance changes as proposed.
Appearing for the School District
Troy Stein
Applicant Comments
Mr. Stein addressed the Commission and explained that the proposed sign will be digital LED, adding
the sign will be able to display results for all sports. Stein asked the Commission for their support.
Discussion/Comments
• Mr. Stein was asked if the “hornet” logo is lit. Mr. Stein informed the Commission the hornet
would be illuminated only during games.
• A question was raised if the sponsorship raceways could display the sponsors more uniformly
and not randomly display them “all over the board”. It was noted that sponsors logo would be
displayed along the “raceways”; however without uniformity. A sponsor’s” brand” logo would be
permitted.
Motion
Motion was made by Commissioner Carr to recommend that the City Council approve amending
the Ordinance based on the staff findings presented in the staff report. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Thorsen. All voted aye. The motion carried.
Chair Platteter asked Mr. Stein when the District proposes to have the sign up. Mr. Stein responded
their goal is to have it up and running by fall.
VI. Community Comment. None
VII. Correspondence and Petitions
Chair Platteter acknowledged receipt of the Attendance and Council Connection.
VII. Chair and Member Comments
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/25/2016
7
Commissioner Lee commented that for her the engineering departments’ project memo is very helpful,
adding she feels it would be very useful to receive project memos from the Transportation Commission.
Lee questioned if it would be possible to get feedback from the Transportation Commission (especially
for the Southdale area) when the Commission is reviewing development proposals. Continuing, Lee
said she feels there is a gap, adding she is not sure of the Transportation Commissions role.
Chair Platteter informed Commissioners the Transportation Commission no longer has an “active” role,
adding they used too. He said believes a decision was made (before his time) by the Council to
eliminate the Transportation Commission from the planning project review process. Platteter said when
a formal application is filed both the applicant and City work under a timeline established by the
Legislature. Platteter said he believes at one time both the City Council, Transportation and Planning
Commissions reviewed proposals; however, it became a long difficult process (under a time line) adding
the question got to be about the public process. By statute the Planning Commission holds the public
hearings, not the Transportation Commission. Notification or “getting the word out” at the
Transportation Commission level could become confusing on who conducts the public hearing. Teague
agreed reiterating a duplication process did occur when the Transportation Commission commented on
site specific issues. Platteter noted that all development proposals go before the City Council, noting a
“two-step” process became a “three-step process” if it went before the Transportation Commission.
Commissioner Lee stated she believes the Commission should know how the Transportation
Commission feels about a specific project along with their suggestions if warranted. Planner Teague
responded the transportation element for every project is addressed in the engineering memo by Mark
Nolan, the transportation planner.
A question was raised if the traffic consultants and Mr. Nolan look at developments from a multimodal
point, not just a vehicle point. Planner Teague responded that the “policy” when reviewing a
development proposal would be to include all forms of transportation in the traffic study and engineers
memo.
Commissioner Carr said she was curious about the Council outcome of the sketch plan review proposal
for the properties on the 4500 block of France by Ed Noonan. Planner Teague responded the developer
revised the plan before Council review per suggestions from the Commission, adding the Council heard
the sketch plan and agreed with much of what the Commission suggested. Teague said the Council
appeared to be receptive to the proposal, adding he believes Mr. Noonan will return with a formal
application.
Commissioner Nemerov commented in thinking about his previous comments on boulevards that now
he’s not sure if it’s a good idea especially when one considers the chemicals used to keep a boulevard
“green”. Commissioner Hobbs pointed out there are hardy plants that can be planted on boulevards
along busy streets. He said not all boulevards need to be “green grass turf”.
VIII. Staff Comments
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/25/2016
8
Planner Teague informed Commission they are invited to attend a work session with the City Council on
May 17th. At 5:30. Mic Johnson, Southdale Area Plan Process, will present findings to the City Council.
Teague said the work session is not mandatory; just an invite.
IX. Adjournment
Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to adjourn the planning commission meeting
at 8:30 P.M. Motion seconded by Commissioner Olsen. All voted aye; motion to adjourn
carried.
Jackie HoogenakkerJackie HoogenakkerJackie HoogenakkerJackie Hoogenakker
Respectfully submitted
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: B.2.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Minutes
From:Sharon Allison, Engineering Specialist
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission April 21,
2016
Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Receive the minutes of the Edina Transportation Commission for April 21, 2016.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Minutes, ETC, April 21, 2016
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/19/2016
1
Minutes
City of Edina, Minnesota
Transportation Commission
Mayors Conference Room
April 21, 6:00 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Chair LaForce called the meeting to order.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Brown, Ding, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Loeffelholz, Miranda, and
Olson. Absent at roll call was member Ruehl.
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Boettge approving the meeting agenda. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Olson approving the edited Mar. 17, 2016,
minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried.
V. Special Recognitions And Presentations
A. Presentation by Metro Transit on Transit Service in Edina
Ms. Cyndi Harper, manager of route planning for Metro Transit, and Mr. John Harper, manager of
contracted transit services for the Met Council presented on Transit Service in Edina. Ms. Harper began
by presenting the elements needed for transit to be successful, why people use transit, direct routes vs.
deviated routes, funding, and level of service. She said Edina was currently served by 12 fixed routes,
including six local routes that operate all day and six limited stop or express routes during rush hour.
Mr. Harper presented on none-fixed route transit that augment fixed route transit. He said Metro
Mobility is available to comply with federal and state Americans with Disability Act; Dial-A-Ride and
Transit Link are available by reservation for curb-to-curb pick-up and drop-off. Mr. Harper said fixed
routes have a required walking distance of a quarter mile in the winter from Nov-Mar, and half mile in the
summer from Apr-Oct. He said the Edina Community Center and Cedars of Edina Apartment totaled 890
trips this past March.
Ms. Harper said future improvements proposed for Edina includes nine new routes; however, none are
funded. They are long term planning and to help make the case for funding. In reference to Southwest
LRT, Ms. Harper said there won’t be a station in Edina but a park and ride would be nearby.
Ms. Harper said Edina could take steps to make improvements (some already being done) such as having
high quality pedestrian connections, having multi-use corridors, cluster commercial and residential
together, and emphasize the streets instead of parking lots. Ms. Harper said state statute allows Edina to
operate its own fixed route system.
Their presentation is attached as part of the minutes.
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/19/2016
2
Discussion
• Need to clarify who they are planning transit for – seniors who wish to stay in the community but
are no longer driving; getting students from the high school to transit center; and, getting around
Edina in general. Ms. Harper said they could help to identify unmet needs in Edina; however, most
people in Edina have access to cars so they’ll need to find the balance between those with and
without access. She said the current senior population is the first generation to not have any
experience with transit and when most are no longer driving, they are also not active in the
community. She said development pattern is still a problem.
• Ms. Harper was asked about bus shelter and she explained that the threshold for a shelter is 25
boardings per day in the suburbs and 40 in Minneapolis. She said sometimes the threshold is met
but there is a lack of funding. She said the Met Council is focusing on shelters in relation to equity
and Edina locations are not included at present. She said some shelters are funded by groups or
companies but funding maintenance is an issue also.
B. Southdale Area Transportation Study Update
Mr. Chuck Rickart, traffic engineer with WSB & Associates, presented an update on the Southdale Area
Transportation Study. Mr. Rickart explained that in 2008, the SE Edina Traffic Model was developed and it
was used widely by developers. Also in 2008, the Comprehensive Plan was updated and a Transportation
Plan was added.
Mr. Rickart said the study area was expanded pass north of TH-62 up to W. 60th Street; the study will
update the transportation planning model, look at land use density scenarios; and pedestrians/bike
connections and conflicts. The study process included data collection from 57 intersections; traffic counts;
field observations; existing average daily traffic volumes; existing level of service; forecasted 2040
conditions using the regional Travel Demand Model developed by the Met Council; and high density
scenario increases.
Discussion
• Is W. 60th & Xerxes Avenue included in the study? No, said planner Nolan; however, City of
Minneapolis and Hennepin County plan to install a traffic signal this summer at this intersection.
• Does the model assume no change in behavior (or shifts in modes) in 2040? Mr. Rickart said the
model is based on the Met Council’s specific formulas and their projections for the metro area.
• Concern was raised with the projected level of service in the TH-62 & France Avenue area. Mr.
Rickart will verify.
• Why is the City studying higher density? Planner Nolan said for pre-emptive measures and Mr.
Rickart added that it helps to know what certain densities would do to the transportation system
and what improvements would be needed.
• What other data sets are being used for the review and analysis of the pedestrian and bike
system? Mr. Rickart said he could find out from the Met Council.
• Is the assumption that only minor improvements will be needed, because this is probably not the
assumption of most people of the Southdale area? Mr. Rickart said yes, given that they will not
need to add lanes to the roadway system.
In summary, Mr. Rickart said most of the issues can be taken care of with low cost improvements such
as new traffic signals, improvements to turning lanes and signal timing. The final report should be ready
by June or July.
VI. Community Comment
Mrs. Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, noted that Menards purchased the land at W. 78th Street and France
Avenue which will have an effect on traffic. Mr. Rickart said adjustments will be made as needed.
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/19/2016
3
VII. Reports/Recommendations
A. 2016 Work Plan Updates
1. Study and report on Community Circulator (Loeffelholz and Brown)
Member Loeffelholz said they haven’t met yet; however, it appears they are trying to solve several
issues that are not clearly defined and asked how they should define the scope. The consensus was
that the ETC should define the scope and members Loeffelholz and Brown will identify the issues.
2. Organize and host a transportation-themed event with speaker(s) (Bass)
Member Bass asked for feedback on speakers. She said she thought about doing like the Energy and
Environment Commission where they actively promote their events. She is considering inviting the
founder of StrongTowns.org who does curbside chats. He has one scheduled for May 3 that she will
attend to see if he’s a good fit and she invited other members to attend. She said she would entertain
other ideas. Member Iyer suggested a panel discussion.
3. Prepare and comment on Comprehensive Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan for inclusion in 2018
Comprehensive Plan (Olson and Miranda)
Nothing to report at this time.
4. Review Edina To Go app and provide recommendations to staff regarding organization/categories
for reporting concerns related to streets/transportation (Iyer)
Member Iyer said he reviewed the app and it is nicely done. He noted some areas that could be
improved (neighborhood map, City news) and suggested some new features (walking/biking map). Mr.
Jordan Gilgenbach in the communications department is responsible for the app and chair LaForce
suggested inviting him to attend a meeting to talk about the app and share ideas.
5. Review data from City’s Quality of Life Survey (2011, 2013, 2015) and conduct two public
meetings to identify gaps around the City’s transportation systems (LaForce)
Member LaForce said they may need to survey residents directly to get them involved. He said it
might be interesting to include neighborhood walk scores for feedback. He suggested identifying the
top gaps by modes (pedestrians, bikes, cars). He acknowledged that some of these areas will be
outside of the City’s control so they will need to create an advocacy plan to deal with other agencies.
Another suggestion was to reach out to residents using Next Door instead of Speak Up Edina
because of low participation.
6. Make recommendations to staff for evaluation of the Living Streets and Streets Smarts outreach
campaigns (Janovy)
Nothing to report at this time.
7. Provide input to staff on the creation of a walking map of the City indicating routes and areas of
interest (Boettge)
Member Boettge said she reached out to a staff working on a walking map and the staff sent a link to
a Cambridge, MA, map that the staff was planning to duplicate. Member Boettge expressed
frustration about not having an opportunity to provide input on ETC’s map and instead being asked to
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/19/2016
4
provide input on staff’s map. Member Iyer said the Edina To Go app has a “Places” in the app with
photos and descriptions that could probably be enhanced.
8. Passenger Rail – planner Nolan said this topic was suggested by manager Neal as an addition to
the ETC’s work plan and he and chair LaForce are scheduled to meet with manager Neal for
further discussion. Member Brown has agreed to be the ETC lead on this new work plan initiative.
B. 2015 Street Smarts Campaign Evaluation
Planner Nolan said the communications department has asked if the ETC would like to do a campaign in 2016.
Member Janovy said they cannot evaluate 2015 because they do not know how or what information was
presented to the public, nor the public’s feedback to the campaign. Member Bass suggested generating a list of
evaluation questions. Member Janovy has some ideas that she will send to planner Nolan.
C. Benton Ave & Hwy 100 Ramp Pedestrian Improvements
Planner Nolan said the changes include shortening the crossing distance and making the median a little longer.
To minimize sightline issues, vegetation on the west will be trimmed but the bridge rail on the east will continue
to be an issue. Stop signs were suggested and MnDOT is still evaluating this. Planner Nolan said the changes
were shared with residents and they still have concerns but they cannot be addressed at this time.
D. Traffic Safety Report of April 6, 2016
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Brown to forward the April
6, 2016, Traffic Safety Report to City Council.
D.2. Member Bass polled the commission to see how many of them walk in Edina and seven, plus two staff
said they did.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
VIII. Correspondence And Petitions - None
IX. Chair and Member Comments
A. Living Streets Citywide Integration
Member Bass said the ETC should identify other decision-making processes to see if they align with the
Living Streets Plan. She mentioned the transportation study presentation and said they should set targets
from the Living Streets Plan for the study and what their expectations are from consultants. She said the
transportation study presentation tonight was very different from the one presented by the Grandview
District Transportation Study consultants. Member Janovy said they had previously talked about the ETC
and Planning Commission forming a working group. Member Bass said they could draft a scope to present
at a future meeting.
Member Miranda said he did the 30-days of biking blog post; he said he’s reading through the Bike Plan
from 2007 and there were no bike facilities then compared to now; and the Hennepin History Museum is
doing a presentation on mapping the second golden age of bicycle.
Member Janovy thanked member Bass for presenting the TSC request review to the City Council. She
asked if there was a map that shows all the construction areas and street closures, and planner Nolan said
no, but residents can sign up to receive City Extra email updates. She said it would be good to have a map.
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 5/19/2016
5
Member Bass said the TSC request review presentation was well received by the Council. She said the
Council wants to learn from the data.
X. Staff Comments
• A petition was received for a sidewalk on Tower Street (Golf Terrace A) and it was approved by
Council.
• On May 15, Council will receive a report on 2015 PACS fund expenditures of $1.1m.
• The grant application for the Oaklawn Avenue sidewalk was not approved because it did not
demonstrate sufficient resident support for the “on-ramp” to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail.
• A grant of $100,000 was approved by Hennepin County for the Vernon Avenue sidewalk.
• TH-100 and ramps reconstruction – the bridges are opened; the northbound W. 50th Street ramp
will be closed until August.
• TH-169 bridge replacement is scheduled for next year and the stretch between Bren Road to 7th
Street will be completely closed during reconstruction. TH-100 reconstruction will be completed
before MnDOT begin working on TH-169 because northbound traffic will be detoured to TH-
100.
• Stop-bar policy – there is none currently, and safety coordinator Totten was influential in getting
the Local Road Research Board to study this issue; $10,000 was allocated for the study.
XI. Calendar of Events
A. Schedule of Meeting and Events as of Apr. 21, 2016
XII. Adjournment at 9:30 p.m.
J F M A M J J A S O N D SM WS
# of
Mtgs
Attendance
%
Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 4
NAME TERM
(Date) 6/21
Bass, Katherine 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 100%
Boettge, Emily 3/1/2017 1 1 1 3 75%
Brown, Andy 3/1/2019 1 1 2 100%
Iyer, Surya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 100%
LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 100%
Loeffelholz, Ralf 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 100%
Janovy, Jennifer 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 100%
Miranda, Lou 3/1/2019 1 1 2 100%
Olson, Larry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 100%
Ding, Emily (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 2 50%
Ruehl, Lindsey (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 2 50%
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE
1
Cyndi Harper
Manager, Route Planning
Metro Transit
TRANSIT SERVICE IN EDINA
John Harper
Manager, Contracted Transit Services
Metropolitan Council
Edina Transportation Commission
April 21, 2016
•Transit 101
•Service in Edina
•Next Steps
2
2
Transit 101
Types of Transit Service
•Fixed Route (Metro Transit)
•Paratransit (Metro Mobility)
•General public dial-a-ride (Transit Link)
3
Transit 101
•Primary destinations: work, shopping/errands, school,
social trips
•Why do people use transit: no car, save money on gas &
parking
•What makes transit attractive
– Convenient, frequent, direct service
– Travel time competitive with driving (congestion, transit
advantages)
– No free parking
•Limited budget means we need to maximize investment,
match transit service to demand
4
3
What is “Successful Transit”?
•Carries people
– 91 million rides in 2015
– 75% on fixed route bus, Metro
Mobility and Transit Link
•Provides basic access
•Simple, direct route structure
Transit 101
What is “Successful Transit”?
•Cost-effective use of public funding
– 2015 operating budgets:
• Fixed route: $404 million, Metro Mobility: $62.5 million,
Transit Link $7.6 million
– Sources of funding: MVST, passenger fares, federal/state/local
Transit 101
2011 Met Council Weekday Subsidy/Passenger
4
7
What is “Successful Transit”?
•Type, level of service matches development patterns
Transit 101
•12 fixed bus routes
serve the city
– 6 local routes
– 6 limited-stop/
express routes
•Facilities
– Southdale Transit
Center
– 12 shelters
– 387 bus stops
Transit Service in Edina
5
Ridership, Span of Service on Local Routes
9
Transit Service in Edina
Total
Rides
Edina
Rides Span
Total
Rides
Edina
Rides Span
Total
Rides
Edina
Rides Span
6 9473 1111
4:15am-
2:45am 5225 894
4:15am-
2:45am 3989 640
5:55am-
1:43am
46 1332 81
5:10am-
10:45pm 567 62
6:10am-
10:45pm 348 33
8:00am-
8:45pm
515 1826 366
4:50am-
1:00am 1647 370
6:15am-
1:00am 1077 244
6:15am-
12:30am
537 112 85
7:30am-
6:30pm n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
538 440 170
5:15am-
10:00pm 362 133
6:30am-
8:00pm 246 89
8:45am-
7:15pm
540 746 210
5:50am-
11:30pm 385 70
7:00am-
11:00pm 293 53
7:30am-
9:30pm
WEEKDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY
Ridership, Span of Service on Express Routes
10
Transit Service in Edina
Total Rides Edina Rides Span
146 418 67
6:12am-8:45am;
4:00pm-6:30pm
156 459 33
6:05am-9:00am;
3:15pm-6:45pm
578 402 215
6:10am-8:51am;
3:30pm-6:30pm
579 141 61
7:00am-8:45am;
3:45pm-6:09pm
587 245 135
6:00am-8:45am;
4:00pm-7:00pm
684 163 50
5:20am-9:15am;
3:10pm-7:30pm
WEEKDAY
6
•ADA service
-Complies with ADA (Americans
with Disabilities Act) federal
requirements
-Complementary to all-day regular
route
-For people who live near service
but are unable to use because of
disability
•Non-ADA service
-State requirement
-Available to ADA-certified riders
Paratransit: Metro Mobility
Transit Service in Edina
Dial-a-Ride: Transit Link
Transit Service in Edina
•General public transit
•Must reserve ride in advance
•Curb-to-curb with limited
assistance
•Shared-ride service
•Available on weekdays from
6:00 a.m.- 7:00 p.m.
•30 min. pick-up window
7
•Available where regular route service does not operate
•Walking distance
-¼ mile Nov - Mar
-½ mile Apr - Oct
•Eligibility based on specific trip request
•Riders may use a combination of Transit Link and regular
routes to complete their trip
•890 trips in Edina in March 2016
-Most of the trips stay within Edina
-Top destinations: Edina Community Center, Cedars of Edina
Apartments
Transit Service in Edina
Dial-a-Ride: Transit Link
Next Steps
•Service Improvement Plan
– Span, frequency of service
improvements on nine
existing routes
– Three proposed new routes
– None are currently funded
•Improved signage
•Southwest LRT
Future improvements proposed in Edina
14
8
What can the city can do to improve the market
for transit?
•High-quality pedestrian connections, walkable
environment with frequent street crossings
•Variety of uses concentrated in corridors
•Cluster the locations of employment, housing
•Developments that emphasize the street, not the
parking lot
Next Steps
MN Statute Chapter 241-S.F. No. 54
•Edina may construct, acquire, maintain, and operate
a public fixed route system
– City may acquire all equipment needed to operate the
system
– City may directly operate the system or contract to manage
or operate it on behalf of the city
•CSAH 62 on the north, TH 100 on the west, city
limits on south and east
Next Steps
9
Discussion points
•What are we doing well?
•Where can we improve?
•What opportunities exist to grow transit
usage in the city?
•How can we learn more about unmet travel
needs in Edina?
•Once we have a better feel for the
opportunities and unmet needs, then we can
discuss potential solutions.
Next Steps
Cyndi Harper
Manager, Route Planning
Metro Transit
TRANSIT SERVICE IN EDINA
John Harper
Manager, Contracted Transit Services
Metropolitan Council
Edina Transportation Commission
April 21, 2016
10
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: B.3.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Minutes
From:Rebecca Foster, GIS Administrator
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission May 12,
2016
Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Receive the May 12, 2016, minutes of the Energy & Environment Commission.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Minutes Energy & Environment Commission May 12, 2016
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: June 9, 2016
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Energy and Environment Commission
Edina City Hall Community Room
Thursday, May 12, 2016, 7:00 PM
I. Call To Order
Chair Zarrin called the meeting to order at 7:01p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering Roll Call were Burmeister, Glahn, Horan, Jackson, Kostuch, Manser, Mohanty, Reinke,
Satterlee, Seeley, Stefanik, Waddick, and Chair Zarrin.
Late:
Absent:
Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion made by Jackson to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion seconded by Manser. Motion
carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
• Accept “Track Changes” within the Education & Outreach Working Group 4-14-16 5th Annual
Forum Minutes and add to June packet.
Motion made by Manser to approve the March 10, 2016 minutes with edits. Motion seconded by
Zarrin. Motion carried.
V. Special Recognitions And Presentations
• None.
VI. Community Comment
• Clover Graham, Sam P. and Kim A. voiced concerns over the school districts crumb rubber
infill for their athletic fields.
• Megan O’Hara announced Edina’s Community Solar Garden Subscriptions are now open.
Motion made by Manser that the EEC go on record to recognize the community voice and
body of scientific evidence regarding opposition to the use to crumb rubber and recommend
the City and the School Board do further review for alternative products or solutions used by
other communities. Motion seconded by Burmeister. Kostuch and Glahn opposed. Motion
carried.
VII. Reports/Recommendation
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: June 9, 2016
A. CERTS – Fostering Sustainable Behavior
• Alexis Troschinetz from CERTs presented on Fostering Sustainable Behaviors: Behavior
Change Science for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Action.
• Clean Energy Resource Teams connect individuals and their communities to the resources
they need to identify and implement community based clean energy projects.
B. Partners in Energy Update
• The early draft is in May packet to review.
• The Final draft will be approved at June meeting.
• The City Council will approve PiE next.
• There will be a MOA signed with Xcel Energy.
C. 2016 Workplan / Workgroups
Motion made by Manser to approve the new Residential Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Working Group with Commissioners Burmeister and Mohanty as Co-Chairs. Motion seconded by
Seeley. Motion carried.
Motion made by Zarrin to approve the new Business Energy Efficiency and Conservation Working
Group with Commissioner Jackson as Chair. Motion seconded by Manser. Motion carried.
Motion made by Glahn to approve the new City Operations Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Subcommittee with Commissioners Glahn, Kostuch and Manser as Members. Motion seconded by
Zarrin. Motion carried.
VIII. Correspondence And Petitions
• Mr. Bintner reviewed the current correspondences.
IX. Chair And Member Comments
A. Attendance report and roster
• No Comment.
A. Workgroup list and Minutes
• The list will be updated with new Energy Working Groups and Subcommittee.
• Melissa Seeley will be Chair for the Student Environmental Leadership Council.
B. Chair and Member Comments
• No Comment.
C. Energy Subcommittee
• Discussed earlier with 2016 Workplan / Workgroups.
D. Education Outreach Working Group
• April Forum was a success.
• Next year, have less speakers, host event on a Saturday, and have more concrete action
items for attendees to take away.
Rebecca Foster
GIS Administrator
Draft Minutes111
Approved Minutes
Approved Date: June 9, 2016
E. Recycling, Solid Waste and Organics Working Group
• Organics Ordinance will be presented in June.
• Continue working on Preferred Packaging Ordinance.
F. Student Subcommittee
• Tech Dump just ended, so gathering stats.
• Need to work on Composting & Recycling with Students in High School.
G. Water Quality Working Group
• Table at April Forum.
• Table at Garden Club Sale.
• Display at Library on insects and a rain garden were successful.
• Storm Stenciling has started.
• Meet with Minneapolis to discuss their Storm Stenciling procedures.
X. Staff Comments
A. Staff Comments
• The City didn't receive a Smart Cities or Green Core Grant Applications.
• Waiting for response on EV Charging Station Grant Application.
• Reviewed Edina's Infrastructure Brochure.
• Public Works Open House on May 21st from 10-2pm.
EEC Members will have a group photo before the June 9th meeting at 6:45pm.
XI. Adjournment
Motion made by Glahn to adjourn the May 12, 2016 meeting at 8:59p.m. Motion seconded by Member
Jackson. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: B.4.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
Minutes
From:Joyce Repya, Senior Planner
Item Activity:
Subject:Heritage Preservation Board Minutes, May 10, 2016 Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
INTRODUCTION:
Attached are the approved Minutes from the May 10, 2016 Heritage Preservation Board meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Heritage Preservation Board Minutes, May 10, 2016
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/14/2016
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Heritage Preservation Board
Edina City Hall Community Room
May 10, 2016, at 7:00 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Chair Birdman called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call were Chairman Birdman, Vice Chair Weber, and Members Moore, McLellan,
Nymo, and Student Members Puerzer and Otness. Absent were Members Christiaansen, Kelly, and
Pearson. Staff Liaison, Senior Planner Repya was also in attendance.
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion was made by Moore and seconded by McLellan to approve the meeting agenda. All
voted aye. The motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion was made by Moore and seconded by Weber to approve the minutes from the April
12, 2016 meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried.
V. Community Comment - None
VI. Reports/Recommendations
A. Changes to Certificate of Appropriateness - 4610 Browndale Avenue originally issued 2-9-
2016
Planner Repya explained that at the February 9, 2016 meeting, a COA was issued for changes to
an attached street facing garage at 4610 Browndale Avenue. Now, the owner would like to make
the following changes to the plans:
1. Re-orienting the garage access to the north side yard
2. Eliminating the street facing garage doors
3. Maintaining the existing capacity for 3 car stalls, but negating a tandem situation
4. Matching materials and the details of the home as follows:
A. Option 1. Stucco and half-timbers to match character of existing home as well as dining
addition to the Southwest corner of house; or
B. Option 2. Brick and stone to match character of existing home, dependent upon availability
of matching brick. Original brick manufacturer is no longer in business.
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/14/2016
Repya concluded that both of the options proposed for the attached garage on the north side of the
home, (identified as options #1 and #2), complied with the Country Club District’s plan of treatment, as
did the plan originally plan approved on February 9, 2016; thus staff recommended approval of the
requested changes. The approval recommendation was subject to the revised plans dated April 29,
2016, and notifying City Staff of the decided upon final option #1 or #2.
Jean Rehkamp Larson, of Rehkamp Larson Architects, representing the owners was available to address
the proposed changes. Ms. Rehkamp Larson pointed out that as proposed, the windows on street
facing façade of the garages differ for the two options with the two windows separated on option #1
(half timber & stucco) and close together on option #2 (brick & stone). She added that if option #2 is
chosen, she would like to amend the proposed spacing of the two window as proposed in option #1;
pointing out that while the windows on the home are shown close together, by separating them on the
garage, that space would be articulated as a secondary structure to the home.
Motion was made by Weber and seconded by Moore to approve both options 1 and 2 (as
amended) of the proposal, with the applicant providing staff with the plans for final decided
upon option. All voted aye. The motion carried.
B. Changes to Certificate of Appropriateness - 4602 Wooddale Avenue originally issued 3-10-
2015
Planner Repya explained that at the March 10, 2015, Heritage Preservation Board meeting, plans for a
new detached garage were approved. The homeowner delayed construction of the new garage pending
the outcome of additions made to the rear of the home that were not subject to a COA. The work on
the home is now complete, and they would like to proceed with construction of the new detached
garage, with some changes. The proposed changes include:
1. Increasing size from 470 sq. ft. to 527 sq. ft. in area after realizing that the fear of
exceeding lot coverage was not an issue: length of structure increased 2’10’; width reduced 4.5”
2. Adding a 1’4” brick foundation around the perimeter on all elevations (brick salvaged from
the rear additions to the home)
Repya added that the following elements of the original plan are proposed to stay the same:
3. Setback from side and rear lot lines
4. Wall cladding (with the exception of the additional 1’4” brick foundation)
5. 14/12 pitched roof - Slate roof if possible (dependent upon final budget)
6. mass of structure - Heights at peak/mid-point/eave
Repya concluded that staff recommends approval of the revised plans dated May 1, 2016, recognizing
that the proposed changes do not change the previously approved project’s compliance with the
Country Club District’s Plan of Treatment.
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/14/2016
Joy Martin, architect for the owners was present to address the proposed changes. She pointed out that
after researching the cost of a slate roof, it was deemed out of the budget; thus they will use asphalt
shingles to replicate the slate shingles on the home as originally proposed. She also explained that
sconce lanterns are also proposed to be installed on either side of the east facing garage door.
Motion was made by Moore and seconded by Nymo to approve the requested changes to the COA
originally approved on March 10, 2015, including the sconce lanterns proposed on either side of
the east facing garage door. All voted aye. The motion carried.
VII. Correspondence And Petitions - None
VIII. Chair And Member Comments - None
IX. Staff Comments
• Suggested the board consider preservation topics for the Advisors Blog
• Announced that a press release is forth coming announcing Preservation Month
• Invited board members to attend the May 17th City Council meeting when the 2016
Heritage Award will be presented to 5201 Wooddale Avenue; and the Public Hearing will
be held for the landmark designation of the Wooddale Bridge
X. Adjournment - 7:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce Repya
Date: June 21, 2016 Agenda Item #: XIII.
To:Mayor and City Council Item Type:
From:
Item Activity:
Subject:Schedule of Meetings and Events as of June 21, 2016
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
INTRODUCTION:
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Schedule of Meetings & Events as of June 21, 2016
CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF JUNE 21, 2016
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS
Tues June 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues June 21 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues June 21 Joint Work Session – Transportation Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Mon July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed
Mon July 4 Independence Day Parade 10:00 A.M. CITY HALL to 50TH & HALLIFAX
Tues July 5 Meeting Cancelled
Tues July 19 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues July 19 Joint Meeting – Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues July 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues Aug 2 NITE TO UNITE
Tues Aug 2 First Day to File Affidavit of Candidacy 8 A.M.-4:30 P.M. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
Wed Aug 3 Capital Improvement Plan 2017-2021 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Wed Aug 3 Business Meeting 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Wed Aug 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues Aug 9 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY – POLLS OPEN 7 A.M. UNTIL 8 P.M.
Tues Aug 16 Last Day to File Affidavit of Candidacy 8 A.M. 0 5 P.M. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
Tues Aug 16 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues Aug 16 Joint Work Session Community Health Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues Aug 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon Sep 5 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed
Wed Sep 7 Work Session – 2017 – 2021 CIP 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Wed Sep 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS