Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016-07-19 City Council Regular Meeting
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, July 19, 2016 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting. V.Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes of June 14, 2016 Work Session, June 21, 2016 Work Session and Regular Meetng of June 21, 2016 B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 06/16/2016 TOTAL: $1,194,690.65 And Per Pre-List Dated 6/23/2016 TOTAL: $2,381,371.69 And Credit Card Transactions 3/25/2016 - 4/24/2016 TOTAL: $40,256.54 And Per Pre-List Dated 6/30/2016 TOTAL: $1,069,126.59 And Per Pre-List Dated 07/07/2016 TOTAL: $1,773,294.28 C.Request for Purchase: Fiber Expansion City Hall to Pamela Park D.Request for Purchase: Creek Valley Parking Lot E.Request for Purchase: Tenant Sweeper Scrubber – Public Works F.Request for Purchase: 2016 Trackless Sidewalk Machine G.First Amendment To Comfort Station Exclusive License - Garden Park H.Resolution No. 2016-68: Vernon Avenue Sidewalk from Gleason Road to Blake Road Cooperative Agreement I.Request for Purchase: Contract No. ENG 16-14 Wooddale Avenue Bridge Improvements Over Minnehaha Creek J.TraEc Safety Report of June 1, 2016 K.CertiGcate of Completion for 7171 France Avenue L.Request for Purchase: Reject Bid - Contract No. ENG 16-10 Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Installation M.Request for Purchase: Contract No. ENG 16-15 2016 Sealcoating Improvements VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Brian Ryks, Executive Director Metropolitan Airport Commission B.June Speak Up, Edina Presentation VII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eEcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.Public Hearing: Consider Vacation of Sanitary Sewer Easement, 6754 Valley View Road, Resolution No. 2016-67 VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Sketch Plan Review: 7700 France Avenue for Frauenshuh Real Estate on behalf of Twin City Orthopedics B.Partners in Energy Electricity Action Plan and Memorandum of Understanding C.Fred Richards Park Planning Process D.Request for Purchase: Mid America Golf & Landscape - Braemar Golf Course E.Waiver of City Building Fees and Development Permit Fees F.Resolution No. 2016-63: Accepting Various Donations IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence B.Board and Commission 2nd Quarter Attendance Report C.Minutes 1.Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, February 25, 2016 2.Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, March 24, 2016 3.Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, April 12, 2016 4.Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, May 26, 2016 5.Minutes: Community Health Commission, April 11, 2016 & May 9, 2016 6.Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission May 24, 2016 7.Minutes: Transportation Commission, May 19, 2016 8.Minutes: Park Board, May 10, 2016 9.Minutes: Heritage Preservation Board, June 14, 2016 X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor and Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments XIII.Schedule of Meetings and Events as of July 19, 2016 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliGcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes of June 14, 2016 Work Session, June 21, 2016 Work Session and Regular Meetng of June 21, 2016 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: None. ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Work Session Minutes, June 14, 2016 Draft Work Session Minutes, June 21, 2016 Draft Regular Meeting Minutes, June 21, 2016 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 14, 2016 4:11 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order 4:11 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering rollcall was: Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. City Staff in attendance included: Kelly Dumais, City Management Fellow; Scott Neal, City Manager; Eric Roggeman, Finance Director and Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2017-2021 City staff presented a calendar for the development of the 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan. The process of developing and prioritizing projects, identifying funding sources and presenting a draft plan to the City Council was discussed. Council gave staff direction regarding the process. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 19, 2016. James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 21, 2016 5:35 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order 5:35 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering rollcall was: Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Tim Barnes, Facility Manager; Kelly Dumais, City Management Fellow; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director, Scott Neal, City Manager; Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner; and Brian Olson, Public Works Director. RIGHT OF WAY MANAGEMENT – TELECOMMUNICATION ANTENNAS & TOWERS Public Works Director Olson introduced Tim Barnes, Facility Manager. Mr. Barnes made a presentation outlining an ordinance amendment that would govern the placement of telecommunication antennas and towers within the City’s right-of-way. Mr. Barnes explained that 2015 changes to the rules regarding 911 calls’ transmission made by the Federal Communications Commission and technology changes in telecommunication equipment prompted staff to proposed changes in how to manage requests within Edina’s Right-of-way. If adopted the new ordinance will set standards intended to address the visual impacts and locations. Staff will negotiate Small Cell Master License agreements with each of the telecommunication companies and have final approval on each site location. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION JOINT MEETING Transportation Commissioners attending the joint meeting included: Chair Tom LaForce, Commissioners: Katherine Bass, Emily Boettge. Andy Brown, Jennifer Janovy, Ralf Leoffelholz, Larry Olson, Lou Miranda, and Lindsey Reuhl. Chair LaForce informed the Council, the Transportation Commission would like more direction on two items on their 2016 Work Plan. Mr. LaForce noted the items in question were “Initiative #8 Review and Recommend: Passenger Rail Service; and Initiative #1 Study and Report Community Circulator”. The Council and Commission discussed the role of the Transportation Commission during the remainder of 2016 with regards to the two initiatives in question. The Council thanked the Transportation for their efforts on behalf of the Community. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:53 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 19, 2016. Minutes/Edina City Council Work Session/May 3, 2016 2 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 21, 2016 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items V.J. Request for Purchase, Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Update and V.N. Ordinance No. 2016-10 Amending Chapter 24 of the Edina City Code as follows: V.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of June 7, 2016 V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 2, 2016, and consisting of 32 pages; General Fund $128,010.30; Police Special Revenue $9,052.26; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $154,160.44; Arts and Culture Fund $78.00; Working Capital Fund $80,530.14; PIR Construction Fund $1,600.74; Equipment Replacement Fund $57,634.89; Art Center Fund $3,306.47; Golf Dome Fund $1,506.66; Aquatic Center Fund $14,071.41; Golf Course Fund $31,846.86; Ice Arena Fund $53,465.35; Sports Dome Fund $13,370.52; Edinborough Park Fund $15,438.07; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $9,556.09; Liquor Fund $191,696.59; Utility Fund $238,679.18; Storm Sewer Fund $111,010.48; Risk Management ISF $14,964.34; PSTF Agency Fund $17.82; Centennial TIF District $1,906.68; TOTAL $662,522.13 and for receipt of payment of claims dated June 16, 2016, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund $155,385.90; Police Special Revenue $772.79; General Debt Service Fund $6,585.00; Working Capital Fund $33,359.27; Equipment Replacement Fund $960.00; Art Center Fund $440.39; Golf Dome Fund $1,175.43; Aquatic Center Fund $11,698.22; Golf Course Fund $78,274.24; Ice Arena Fund $33,345.80; Sports Dome Fund $2,615.05; Edinborough Park Fund $2,138.38; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,916.29; Liquor Fund $191,666.27; Utility Fund $466,102.86; Storm Sewer Fund $1,238.24; PSTF Agency Fund $33,280.68; Centennial TIF District $19,060.00; Southdale 2 District $107.50; TOTAL $1,044,122.31 V.C. Approve Heritage Preservation Board Appointment Minutes/Edina City Council/June 21, 2016 Page 2 V.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-62, Approving Memorandum of Understanding Between Homeland Security and City of Edina V.E. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-64, Approving Memorandum of Understanding Between Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force and City of Edina V.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-65, Appointing Election Judges for August 9, 2016 V.G. Approve Minnesota Department of Health Master Grant Contract Amendment V.H. Authorize Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements V.I. Request for Purchase, ENG 16-13 Xerxes Avenue Sidewalk Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Concrete Idea, Inc. at 448,866.25 V.J. Request for Purchase, Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Update V.K. Request for Purchase, 2017 Neighborhood Improvement Area Geotechnical Evaluation Services, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Braun Intertec Corporation at $20,540.00 V.L. Approve Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016 V.M. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-66, Approving Cooperative Construction Agreement with the Department of Transportation V.N. Ordinance No. 2016-10, Amending Chapter 24 of Edina City Code V.O. Request for Purchase, City Hall Cleaning Service, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Coverall of the Twin Cities at $2,450.00 Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA V.J. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE – APPROVED Engineer Miller answered a question of the Council related to the cost and details of the plan. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to approve Request for Purchase, Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Update, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Barr Engineering at $200,580.00. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V.N. ORDINANCE NO. 2016-10 AMENDING CHAPTER 24 OF EDINA CITY CODE – ADOPTED The Council noted that good cellular connectivity had become a public safety concern because many emergency phone calls were made on cellular devices. The Ordinance facilitated using the City’s right-of-way for developing technology that provides better connectivity. Member Staunton made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2016-10, Amending Chapter 24 of the Edina City Code Concerning Right-of-way Management. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Minutes/Edina City Council/June 21, 2016 Page 3 VI.A. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015 – ACCEPTED Assistant Finance Director Sawyer explained that at the end of each year an annual audit was conducted by a private accounting firm to issue an unqualified opinion. James Eichten, MMKR, discussed the auditor’s role; audit results; and, the management report including audit summary, property taxes, tax rates, governmental funds overview, enterprise funds overview, legislative updates, accounting and auditing updates, and Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 68. The Council thanked Mr. Eichten and the Finance Department for their work. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to receive the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. MAY SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED – TOPIC: 50TH AND FRANCE Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of May opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to 50th and France. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VII.A. REZONING FROM PCD-4 TO PUD-1, PHOENIX PLAZA AT 3901 70TH STREET FOR HECTOR VINAS – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-60 ADOPTED AND ORDINANCE NO. 2016- 08 FIRST READING GRANTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request from DJR Architecture, on behalf of Hector Vinas, to tear down the existing gas station at 3901 70th Street West and re-build an 8,030 square foot retail building. The request required a Preliminary Rezoning from Planned Commercial District-4 to Planned Unit Development-1 and Preliminary Development Plan. Mr. Teague presented aerial photos of the site, rendering of the proposed building, and revisions from the Sketch Plan. He discussed the parking study, setback, and drainage. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to zoning, setback, and whether a gas station was needed in the area. Proponent Presentation Dean Dovolis, DJR Architecture, presented photos of the proposed building and discussed the revisions from the Sketch Plan. Mr. Dovolis answered questions of the Council related to changes in the fuel industry and the underground retention system. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Minutes/Edina City Council/June 21, 2016 Page 4 Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the proposal, the future of this area, and its desire to see this become a bustling location. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-60, Approving a Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for DJR Architecture Inc. at 3901 70th Street West, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated April 22, 2016, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer’s memo dated May 9, 2016. 4. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the PUD-1 Zoning District. 5. Provision of code compliant bike racks (5 minimum) near the building entrances. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. Provided year-round screening on the west lot line to provide screening to the residential use to the west. 8. If possible, provide over story trees in the boulevard along France and 70th. AND to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2016-08, Amending the Zoning Ordinance to Establish the PUD-8, Planned Unit Development-8 District at 7700 France Avenue. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Hector Vinas thanked the Council and expressed his interest in continued development in the area. VII.B. SITE PLAN REVIEW TO REMODEL AND EXPAND 7625 CAHILL ROAD FOR MINI STORAGE, BUHL INVESTORS – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-61 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the Site Plan review from Peter Deanovic, on behalf of Buhl Investors, to remodel and expand the existing build at 7625 Cahill Road into a mini- storage facility. Mr. Teague presented photos of the site and proposed building. He explained that the proposal met all zoning code requirements and only required a Site Plan review because the square footage of the proposed expansion exceeds the existing square footage by 10%. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval. Minutes/Edina City Council/June 21, 2016 Page 5 Mr. Teague answered a question of the Council related to hours of operation. Proponent Presentation Peter Deanovic, Buhl Investors, shared that he was happy to answer any questions the Council had. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:41 p.m. Public Testimony George Mahowald, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, Apt. 335, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-61, Approving a Site Plan to Remodel and Expand the Existing Building at 7625 Cahill Road into a Mini- Storage Facility, subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped May 11, 2016. • Grading plan date stamped May 11, 2016. • Landscaping plan date stamped May 11, 2016. • Building elevations date stamped May 11, 2016. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements, including the planting of three additional trees. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one- half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council voiced its support of the proposal and requested that staff look into the lighting issue raised by Mr. Mahowald. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. BRAEMAR WINTER RECREATION AREA – FEASIBILITY STUDY APPROVED AND PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED SEPTEMBER 7, 2016 Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh explained that at the May 17, 2016 City Council meeting, the Council authorized staff to proceed with a financial and trail feasibility study for cross-country ski Minutes/Edina City Council/June 21, 2016 Page 6 trails and snow tubing at Braemar Park. Ms. Kattreh discussed the background and schedule. Staff requested direction from the Council to proceed with the winter recreation area design, feasibility study, and bid documents. Paul Pasko, SEH, presented aerial photos of the site and discussed the availability of concessions, parking, and water well. Mr. Pasko talked about snow tubing, cross country skiing, expected trail side equipment, snowmaking operation, and the cost. Dave Belin, RRC Associates, presented the preliminary financial model inputs and market analysis for snow tubing and cross country skiing for a short season (70 days) and a long season (84 days). The development team answered questions of the Council related to expenses, revenue sources, increasing the drop of the snow tubing hill, total cost, implications for neighbors, the schedule, holding a public hearing, and the possibility of a sponsor. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the winter recreation area design, feasibility study, and bid documents. The Council discussed the high cost to continue the process and expressed a desire to hold neighborhood meetings and schedule a public hearing prior to design and bid documents. Member Brindle withdrew the motion. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the completion of the Braemar Winter Recreation Area feasibility study and to schedule a Public Hearing for September 7, 2016. Member Stewart voiced his opinion against spending the money to complete the feasibility study and expressed his desire to spend the money cutting natural trails for cross country skiing and mountain biking that could be maintained in the same manner the high school was currently maintaining trails with volunteer work. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Swenson, Hovland Nay: Stewart Motion carried. VIII.B. ORDINANCE NO. 2016-09 AMENDING CHAPTER 4 CONCERNING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES – ADOPTED Clerk Mangen explained that Buffalo Wild Wings had requested to be allowed to charge patrons a fee to provide tablets for playing video games at their establishment. Attorney Knutson had drafted a tight amendment to City Code. It was noted that Police Chief Nelson, Administration, and Community Health had no objections to making the required change to City Code regarding liquor license establishments. Clerk Mangen answered questions of the Council related to Dave & Buster’s and how the tablets were different than electronic pull tabs. Member Staunton made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2016-09, Amending Chapter 4 of the Edina City Code Concerning Alcoholic Beverages. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Minutes/Edina City Council/June 21, 2016 Page 7 IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. PLANNING COMMISSION, APRIL 27, 2016 2. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, APRIL 21, 2016 3. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, MAY 12, 2016 4. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, MAY 10, 2016 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETING AND EVENTS AS OF JUNE 21, 2016 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 5, 2016. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 21, 2016, meeting available. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 06/16/2016 TOTAL: $1,194,690.65 And Per Pre-List Dated 6/23/2016 TOTAL: $2,381,371.69 And Credit Card Transactions 3/25/2016 - 4/24/2016 TOTAL: $40,256.54 And Per Pre-List Dated 6/30/2016 TOTAL: $1,069,126.59 And Per Pre-List Dated 07/07/2016 TOTAL: $1,773,294.28 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment. INTRODUCTION: Detailed claims list is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Claims Pre-List Dated 06/16/2016 TOTAL: $1,194,690.65 Claims Pre-List Dated 6/23/2016 TOTAL: $2,381,371.69 Credit Card Transactions 3/25/2016 - 4/24/2016 TOTAL: $40,256.54 Claims Pre-List Dated 6/30/2016 TOTAL: $1,069,126.59 Claims Pre-List Dated 07/07/2016 TOTAL: $1,773,294.28 R55CKR2 LOG1S101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3250 6/16/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 124.80 403284 2005114 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 53.60 403485 2008144 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 48.00 403242 2008149 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 100.80 403484 2009690 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 88.00 403486 2009693 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 415.20 3251 6/16/2016 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 120.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 403339 146050 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 120.00 3252 6/16/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,317.55 403490 53830300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.55 403244 53880400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 145.55 403492 53985900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 135.55 403491 53986000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 599.75 403493 53986300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 50.23 403245 93992200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 113.67 403246 94027100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7.24 403497 94027200 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 66.01 403494 94068900 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 6.78 403495 94069000 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 6.73 403496 94069200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,485.61 3253 6/16/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 46.60- RETURN 403422 CP-WO-204000-1- 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 1 87.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00002176 403421 WO-204000-1 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 40.67 3254 6/16/2016 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 553.00 LOCK REPAIR 403343 S92093 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 553.00 3255 6/16/2016 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 29,534.00 JULY 2016 PREMIUMS 403427 LOG10-6/16 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 253,109.50 JULY 2016 PREMIUMS 403427 LOG10-6/16 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 282,643.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 — 6/16/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3256 6/16/2016 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. Continued... 10,628.50 SEWER REHAB 403428 0190362 03493.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Presidents Neighborhood 10,628.50 3257 6/16/2016 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 85.53 ADJUSTER 00005395 403210 1062035 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.20 FILTERS 00005271 403211 1062714 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 133.62 FILTERS 00005271 403212 1062716 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.53 FILTER 00005402 403344 1062812 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.73 CABLE 00005430 403345 1063537 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 295.61 3258 6/16/2016 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 841.25 MATERIALS TESTING 403431 B059608 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 1,533.75 MATERIALS TESTING 403432 8059789 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 2,375.00 3259 6/16/2016 102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC. 1,994.88 KVMSWITCH 403347 DGT4276 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,994.88 3260 6/16/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 488.00 403505 67-280 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 488.00 3261 6/16/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 920.24 SUN CURRENT LIQUOR INSERT 403435 359643 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 920.25 SUN CURRENT LIQUOR INSERT 403435 359643 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 920.25 SUN CURRENT LIQUOR INSERT 403435 359643 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 2,760.74 3262 6/16/2016 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 186.86 OIL 403362 51404 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 186.86 3263 6/16/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 7,790.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002587 403441 14471 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 8,340.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002585 403440 14472 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 9,090.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002584 403442 14475 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 6,580.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002568 403443 14476 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 31,800.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3263 3264 6/16/2016 6/16/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING Continued... 1,504.80 FIELD PAINT 00001074 403604 111889 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,504.80 3265 6/16/2016 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 140.05 PLASTIC PIPE TOOLS 00001106 403374 996883 5912.6556 TOOLS WELL HOUSES 140.05 3266 6/16/2016 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 141.50 TOILET RENTAL 403611 101503 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 141.50 3267 6/16/2016 103217 LHB, INC. 39,092.12 TRANSPORTATION STUDY 403230 150515.00-5 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 7,533.25 GRANDVIEW TRANSPORTATION STUDY 403449 150515.00-7 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 46,626.37 3268 6/16/2016 101792 LUBE-TECH 315.71 CAR WASH FOAM 00005365 403615 785114 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 541.73 VEHICLE CLEANER 00005365 403616 785115 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 857.44 3269 6/16/2016 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,039.58 403534 217737 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,486.25 403532 217739 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 672.65 403533 217743 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,198.48 3270 6/16/2016 101483 MENARDS 65.97 TARPS 00001088 403377 14548 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6.78 BOLTS 00001094 403378 14903 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 32.70 BATTERIES 00001104 403379 15030 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 104.45 3271 6/16/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 119.90 TIRES 00005399 403644 210234112 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119.90 3272 6/16/2016 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3272 6/16/2016 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. Continued... 142.38 SOLENOID 403645 4257 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.60 DRINK HOLDERS 403646 4281 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 990.27 RUBRAIL, FENDER 403647 1001143 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 915.00 MEMORY CARD 403648 1001146 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,065.53 OUTPUT MODULES 403649 1001156 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.45 ACCESS DOOR HANDLE 403651 1001174 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,180.41 WINDOW 403650 1001238 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,415.54 3273 6/16/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 336.90 NITRILE GLOVES, TOWELS, TISSUE 403463 10049 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 336.90 3274 6/16/2016 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC. 2,000.00 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE PROJECT 403398 76718 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 2,000.00 3275 6/16/2016 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 3,868.61 PLUMBING REPAIRS 403399 68613 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,868.61 3276 6/16/2016 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 765.80 VALVES 00002150 403468 S3251909.001 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 68.72 AIR RELIEF PARTS 00001098 403408 S3266699.001 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 834.52 3277 6/16/2016 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 78.66 SHIPPING CHARGE 403483 717634 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 78.66 3278 6/16/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 1,500.74 CAN NISTER 403415 E195634 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 500.59 CYLINDER 00005266 403666 0139458 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,001.33 3279 6/16/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 85.00 403267 0152886-IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 151.25 403268 0152887-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 110.50 403269 0153252-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 626.00 403554 0153760-1N 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 -- Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3279 6116/2016 119454 V1NOCOPIA Continued... 407.50 403555 0153762-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,380.25 3280 6/16/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 805.20 403270 427294-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE 50TH ST SELLING 76.00- 403557 427655-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,090.85 403336 428010-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 2,196.40 403556 428013-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,016.45 404957 6/16/2016 129458 ACME TOOLS 2,599.00 CONCRETE SAW 403573 4146469 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,599.00 404958 6/16/2016 138492 ALL STATE COMMUNICATIONS 325.00 REPROGRAM FIRE ALARM SYSTEM 403340 247893 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 325.00 404959 6/16/2016 102715 ALLEGRA 413.17 CAFR 403341 120765 1160.6575 PRINTING FINANCE 413.17 404960 6/16/2016 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 103.75 UNIFORM PURCHASE 403342 060716 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 103.75 404961 6/16/2016 138550 ANDERSON, SANDRA 11.32 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403574 300 GROVE PL 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 11.32 404962 6/16/2016 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 144.45 MONITORING SERVICE 403575 195891 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 102.00 403576 195892 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.30 403577 195893 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 342.75 404963 6/16/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 935.25 403243 3103624 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,448.25 403488 3105430 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,416.75 403487 3105431 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 404963 6/16/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 458.00 403285 310622 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 22.56- 403286 347129 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.78- 403289 347132 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.12- 403288 347133 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 321.70- 403287 347541 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,871.09 404964 6/16/2016 102120 ATOL, ROBERT 15.96 PAINT 403420 060216 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 15.96 404965 6/16/2016 133689 AUER STEEL 505.84 LIFT STATION EXHAUST FAN 00001050 403205 5241601 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 505.84 404966 6/16/2016 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 325.50 403290 8577 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 454.00 403489 8658 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 779.50 404967 6/16/2016 126996 BCA CJTE 240.00 TRAINING - K. BOERGER 403206 26379-050416LBC 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 TRAINING - B. KUSKE 403207 26385-050416LBC 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 TRAINING - L. OLSON 403208 29828-050216SMS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 TRAINING - L. OLSON 403209 29828-050416LBC 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 960.00 404968 6/16/2016 103486 BEND IN THE RIVER BIG BAND 125.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/29/16 403569 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 125.00 404969 6/16/2016 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING 7,676.00 WATER REPAIR 00002576 403426 A208332 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 9,920.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002537 403423 A208363 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 6,400.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002557 403424 A208367 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 6,384.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002553 403425 A208375 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 30,380.00 404970 6/16/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 - 6/16/2016 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Page - 7 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 404970 6/16/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. Continued... 720.00 PIZZA 403578 4634423 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 720.00 404971 6/16/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 40.00 403291 301644 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,962.22 403292 301646 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,002.22 404972 6/16/2016 131967 BOLLIG & SONS 2,500.00 ED146805 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 403579 6105 KELLOGG 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 404973 6/16/2016 130602 BOOM ISLAND BREWING COMPANY LLC 156.80 403293 5031 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 156.80 404974 6/16/2016 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 197.00- CREDIT 403430 70227191 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 788.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003717 403429 82165250 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 591.00 404975 6/16/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 470.00 403247 134260 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 504.50 403499 134410 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 340.50 403498 134423 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,315.00 404976 6/16/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 64.13 403297 1080476406 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 853.95 403248 1080479143 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 120.28 403303 1080482341 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,829.21 403302 1080482342 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 212.49 403299 1080482343 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,431.16 403301 1080482394 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,332.09 403300 1080482395 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 27.86 403298 1080482396 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 606.90 403501 1080482399 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 107.38 403295 1080482400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,490.81 403296 1080482401 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 404976 6/16/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 90.30 403502 1080482402 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,704.35 403500 1080482403 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 86.54 403294 1080482434 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 110.15- 403304 2080098779 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 21.00- 403503 2080135478 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 72.00- 403504 2080137983 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 12,754.30 404977 6/16/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 1,250.55 403306 1090569774 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,980.32 403249 1090570571 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,104.25 403250 1090570572 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.80 403251 1090570573 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,829.60 403305 1090571345 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,188.52 404978 6/16/2016 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/28/16 403568 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 404979 6/16/2016 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 3,000.00 BACKGROUND VERIFICAITONS 403580 061016 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,000.00 404980 6/16/2016 138543 C & K SCREEN PRINTING 1,080.00 STAFF SHIRTS 403581 556764 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 466.20 LIT SHIRTS 403582 556790 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 1,546.20 404981 6/16/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 52.95 403307 00011186 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,943.95 403308 923556 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,996.90 404982 6/16/2016 100223 CASS COUNTY 50.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 403346 060716 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 50.00 404983 6/16/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 56.83 952 929-0297 403214 0297-5/16 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 - 6/16/2016 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Page - 9 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 404983 6/16/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 91.53 952 941-1019 403348 1019-5/16 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 60.68 952 941-1410 403349 1410-5/16 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 114.75 952 826-7398 403350 7398-5/16 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 59.06 952 920-8632 403215 8632-5/16 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 454.86 952 927-8861 403213 8861-5/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 837.71 404984 6/16/2016 113151 CHURCH OFFSET PRINTING INC. 760.00 SUMMER RENTAL BROCHURES 403216 85963 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 760.00 404985 6/16/2016 102123 CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES, THE 80.91 APPAREL 403583 PSI-281125 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,392.32 APPAREL 403584 PSI-281411 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,473.23 404986 6/16/2016 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 4,420.82 Q2 LAB SERVICES 403217 060316 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 4,420.82 404987 6/16/2016 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 14.00 UNIBIND COVERS 403351 COM-0885 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 14.00 404988 6/16/2016 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 312.84 403309 0178532328 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 312.84 404989 6/16/2016 120433 COMCAST 9.01 8772 10 614 0161120 403353 161120-5/16 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 28.91 8772 10 614 0220686 403433 220686-6/16 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 152.25 8772 10 604 0540372 403352 540372-5816 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 190.17 404990 6/16/2016 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 493.58 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 403434 CW4815 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 493.59 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 403434 CW4815 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 493.59 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 403434 CW4815 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 1,480.76 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 404991 6/16/2016 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. Continued... 2,673.76 HOT MIX 403585 053116 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,673.76 404992 6/16/2016 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 1,658.80 B-MIX CLAY 00009474 403355 INV000107902 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 83.95 CLAY 403354 1NV000107903 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,742.75 404993 6/16/2016 137199 COVERTTRACK GROUP INC. 600.00 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 403586 17096 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 600.00 404994 6/16/2016 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 92.00 MAY 2016 WASHES 403356 446878 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.00 404995 6/16/2016 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 299,60 114-10014090-3 403218 053116 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 299.60 404996 6/16/2016 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 751.00 JUNE NEWSLETTERS 403357 307148 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 751.00 404997 6/16/2016 134475 D R HORTON INC 2,500.00 ED142320 REFUND ESCROW 403587 5709 ZENITH 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 404998 6/16/2016 136912 DEERBROOKE HOMES 2,500.00 ED140231 REFUND ESCROW 403588 5905 WOODDALE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 404999 6/16/2016 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 78.84 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403589 060616 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 78.84 405000 6/16/2016 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 99.00 651972955 403358 651972955-5/16 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 99.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 — 6/16/2016 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Page - 11 Check 4 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405001 6/16/2016 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. Continued... 6,210.10 REFUSE 403219 DT0001454379 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,016.24 REFUSE 403220 DT0001454380 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 7,226.34 405002 6/16/2016 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC 484.00 403310 11663 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 484.00 405003 6/16/2016 100737 E. H. RENNER & SONS 550.00 MOTOR BALANCING 00001029 403591 149630000 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 804.02 WELL #10 REHAB 403590 BAL DUE 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,354.02 405004 6/16/2016 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 2,142.40 GALVANIZED CHANNEL POSTS 403678 0108508-IN 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 2,142.40 405005 6/16/2016 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 700.00 TASTE TICKET SALES 403592 053116 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 2,415.00 TASTE TICKET SALES 403592 053116 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 4,445.00 TASTE TICKET SALES 403592 053116 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 7,560.00 405006 6/16/2016 103594 EDINALARM INC. 397.58 ALARM SERVICE - JUL 2016 403436 105811 5210.6250 ALARM SERVICE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 397.58 405007 6/16/2016 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 5,463.75 LIFT STATION PUMP REPAIR 00001789 403221 0057882-IN 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 5,463.75 405008 6/16/2016 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 4,098.92 VEHICLE BUILD-UP 403359 RS4358 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 4,098.92 VEHICLE BUILD-UP 403359 RS4358 421450.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ANIMAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT 8,197.84 405009 6/16/2016 138547 EPIC EVENT RENTAL 216.91 OPEN HOUSE RENTAL 00001747 403593 C-001221 1280.6806 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 216.91 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405010 6/16/2016 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. Continued... 441.20 MANHOLE RINGS 00001981 403594 027828 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 441.20 405011 6/16/2016 138542 EYNGORN, BRITT 28.95 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 403595 PUBLIC ART 2610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 28.95 405012 6/16/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 146.30- CREDIT 403281 1-4990262 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.03- CREDIT 403280 1-4990263 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 372.88- CREDIT 403279 1-4990264 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.00 MINIATURE LAMPS 403273 1-4994164 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.10 MINIATURE LAMPS 403275 19-746668 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 164.64 SEAL 403278 69-224166 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 285.47 SENSOR, CONNECTOR ARM 403272 69-224666 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 141.29 ROTORS, BRAKE LINING KIT 403274 69-225011 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.92 TRANSMISSION FLUID 403276 69-225582 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 158.58 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, BRAKE KIT 403597 69-225656 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.04 OIL FILTERS 403277 69-225779 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 317.16 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, BRAKE KITS 403596 69-226365 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 600.99 405013 6/16/2016 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 6.00 STAINLESS STEEL WASHERS 00000066 403360 MNTC2137597 04401.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PROMENADE H2O FEATURE&PATH 6.00 405014 6/16/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 37.01 BOLT SETS 00001034 403361 0188550 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 4,115.43 METERS FOR RESALE 00001033 403598 0194655 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 4,152.44 405015 6/16/2016 122077 FIELDS, DEBRA 2,320.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 403599 060616 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 2,320.00 405016 6/16/2016 103985 FLOR, JON 1,700.00 BRAEMAR GOLF LOGO 403225 2494 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 1,700.00 405017 6/16/2016 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405017 6/16/2016 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. Continued... 226.60 SCISSORS LIFT INSPECTIONS 403222 01S5145490 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 226.60 403223 01S5145500 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 226.60 403224 01S5145510 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 679.80 405018 6/16/2016 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 2,633.84 APPAREL 403437 41141712 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 456.47 APPAREL 403438 41142089 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 734.40 HATS 403439 41142934 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,824.71 405019 6/16/2016 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. 2,197.80 MAY 2015 SERVICE 00001028 403226 6050332 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,197.80 405020 6/16/2016 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 80.00 REFLECTIVE POLICE SHIELDS 403363 107992 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,232.00 REFLECTIVE KITS FOR VEHICLES 403600 108060 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,312.00 405021 6/16/2016 101103 GRAINGER 271.60 EAR MUFFS 00001086 403364 9124562290 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 465.48 LOCATING PAINT 00001016 403365 9125219387 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 9.48 INNER TUBE 00005357 403366 9125219395 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.92 TIE DOWN STRAPS 00005357 403367 9125610122 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.55 TOOL BOX 00005361 403368 9126192344 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.45 SLEEVE ANCHOR 00005364 403369 9126985523 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.04 TIRES 00005364 403370 9126985531 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 959.52 405022 6/16/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 326.50 403506 MN00004510 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 242.25 403253 MN00005115 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 262.75 403252 MN00005166 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 831.50 405023 6/16/2016 137078 GREENWALD ROOFING CO. 260.00 REPAIR ROOF LEAK 403371 10480 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 260.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 — 6/16/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405024 6/16/2016 138546 GRIMES DESIGN Continued... 2,069.00 FLUSHING HYDRANTS 00001093 403601 21613 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,069.00 405025 6/16/2016 134391 GRIMES, LAURYN 9.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403602 060716 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 9.18 405026 6/16/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 6,410.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 403603 0616-24 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 6,410.00 405027 6/16/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,579.30 MAY 2016 RADIO FEES 403373 1000077494 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,192.44 MAY 2016 RADIO FEES 403372 1000077495 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,771.74 405028 6/16/2016 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 73.70 OFFICE REMODEL 403227 590851 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 73.70 405029 6/16/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 717.50 403311 829318 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,991.50 403312 830895 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,541.50 403313 831174 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,250.50 405030 6/16/2016 138539 HOMEWARD BOUND 450.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 403605 060916 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA 450.00 405031 6/16/2016 103302 HONEYWELL CONCERT BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/26/16 403566 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405032 6/16/2016 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 453.00 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 403445 160523019 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 75.50 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 403446 160523039 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,126.40 ACID TANK INSTALL 403444 SV160518061 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,654.90 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 - 6/16/2016 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Page - 15 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405033 6/16/2016 100812 IAAO Continued... 35.00 CANDIDACY APPLICATION 403606 060716 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 35.00 405034 6/16/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 337.62 403314 40374 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 337.62 405035 6/16/2016 105052 INNOVATIVE GRAPHICS 659.75 SAFETY CAMP SHIRTS 403607 42692 1630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS 659.75 405036 6/16/2016 118275 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 45.95 NOTARY STAMP 403375 398684 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 45.95 405037 6/16/2016 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 15.98 403608 5/16-ELEC 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 16.38 403608 5/16-ELEC 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 45.97 403608 5/16-ELEC 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 13.18 403609 5/16-STREETS 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 27.86 403609 5/16-STREETS 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 30.77 403609 5/16-STREETS 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.79 403609 5/16-STREETS 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 70.05 403609 5/16-STREETS 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,221.66 403609 5/16-STREETS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 195.93 403609 5/16-STREETS 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1.59 403610 5/16-UTIL 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 23.72 403610 5/16-UTIL 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 40.87 403610 5/16-UTIL 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 76.56 403610 5/16-UTIL 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 426.57 403610 5/16-UTIL 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 3,243.88 405038 6/16/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,766.15 403255 2510957 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 24.60 403254 2510958 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 14,331.65 403256 2510963 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,351.45 403507 2510991 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 108.30 403508 2510992 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 99.00 403509 2510993 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405038 6/16/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR 01ST. OF MINN Continued-. 26,681.15 405039 6/16/2016 123551 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 25.00 PERMIT REFUND 403612 ED147490 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 25.00 405040 6/16/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,886.28 403257 5450347 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 378.83 403259 5454803 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 399.11 403258 5454806 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,825.28 403315 5454808 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 204.32 403318 5457090 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 33.41 403317 5457508 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 33.41 403316 5457509 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 225.00 403510 5457723 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.50 403511 5457724 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.32 403520 5461480 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,812.80 403514 5461489 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,071.10 403513 5461490 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 128.00 403524 5461491 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,837.89 403512 5461492 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 640.37 403526 5461493 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,013.69 403527 5461494 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 488.67 403528 5461495 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 33.41 403525 5461496 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,143.53 403519 5461501 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 2,052.53 403523 5461502 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,220.62 403516 5461503 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 38.41 403517 5461504 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,865.77 403521 5461505 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 43.98 403522 5461506 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 389.13 403518 5461507 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,917.40 403515 5461508 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 22.26- 403529 573197 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 14.81- 403530 576708 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.50- 403531 576709 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36,676.19 405041 6/16/2016 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 59.96 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 403572 060116 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 -- Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405041 6/16/2016 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE Continued... 59.96 405042 6/16/2016 102603 JONAS, LENORE 91.54 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 403571 053116 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 91.54 405043 6/16/2016 137500 JOURNAL COMMUNICATIONS INC. 3,445.00 DEED PUBLICATION 403613 060616 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,445.00 405044 6/16/2016 138467 JUST US CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION INC. 17,285.31 STRUCTURE REPAIRS 00001025 403228 3371 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 17,285.31 405045 6/16/2016 102824 KAY PARK-REC CORP. 290.00 PADDLEBOAT PARTS 00002358 403376 175038 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 290.00 405046 6/16/2016 138176 KNOT, THE 471.75 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 403447 INV00134731 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 471.75 405047 6/16/2016 134675 KOSKINEN, MATTHEW 142.02 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403614 061316 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 50.00 CAMERA RENTAL 403229 201606 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 192.02 405048 6/16/2016 120982 KROOG, RACHEL 250.00 KID POWER 6/30/16 403570 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 405049 6/16/2016 137011 LANDSCAPES UNLIMITED LLC 9,465.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PROJECT 403448 1 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 9,465.00 405050 6/16/2016 136027 LINA 4,376.89 JUNE 2016 LTD PREMIUM 403450 16153 9900.2033.16 LTD -99 PAYROLL CLEARING 4,376.89 405051 6/16/2016 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405051 6/16/2016 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. Continued... 813.26 VALVE 00005400 403617 2163680 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 813.26 405052 6/16/2016 131685 MAILFINANCE INC. 194.97 POSTAGE METER LEASE 403231 N5963299 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 194.97 405053 6/16/2016 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 247.50 HOSTING FEES 403451 218 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 247.50 405054 6/16/2016 130020 MCCD 5,000.00 2016 OPEN TO BUSINESS PROGRAM 403618 6 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 5,000.00 405055 6/16/2016 106326 MEDRANO, CHRIS 1,885.00 GOLF INSTRUCTION 403619 061016 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 1,885.00 405056 6/16/2016 104650 MICRO CENTER 99.99 HARD DRIVE 403232 6123495 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 486.86 IT SUPPLIES 403386 6128964 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 586.85 405057 6/16/2016 124826 MINN CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION 52.50 SUMMARY GUIDES 403385 INV767540 1170.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS HUMAN RESOURCES 52.50 405058 6/16/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,707.50 REPLACE SERVICE LINES 00001030 403380 35215 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,495.00 WATER REPAIR 00002581 403233 35216 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 5,450.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 403452 35218 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 11,652.50 405059 6/16/2016 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 14,994.27 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 403453 901000000541 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 14,994.27 405060 6/16/2016 129063 MINNEAPOLIS SAW COMPANY INC. 306.98 SAFETY CHAPS 00001089 403381 53669 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405060 405061 6/1612016 129063 MINNEAPOLIS SAW COMPANY INC. 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. Continued... 6/16/2016 306.98 42.75 WINDOW CLEANING 403383 928054516 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 32.18 WINDOW CLEANING 403382 928054517 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 10.73 WINDOW CLEANING 403384 928055026 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 85.66 405062 6/16/2016 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 2016 HOSPITALITY FEE 403620 CENT LAKES 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 35.00 405063 6/16/2016 102775 MINNESOTA DNR - OMB 300.00 PROMENADE PHASE 4 403632 2016-1078 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 300.00 405064 6/16/2016 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 118.68 BELTS, BUSHINGS, IDLER 00005403 403234 P08701 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118.68 405065 6/16/2016 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 858.00 GHIN 403621 45015007-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 572.00 403622 45015010-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 1,210.00 403623 45015012-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 484.00 403624 45015013-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 5,610.00 403625 45015014-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 4,664.00 403626 45015016-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 726.00 403627 45015018-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 5.00 403628 45015020-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 10.00 403629 45015021-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 726.00 403630 45015026-5/16 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 14,865.00 405066 6/16/2016 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 261.58 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEES 403631 10000011123 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 261.58 405067 6/16/2016 132597 MIXMI BRANDS INC. 48.00 FROZEN YOGURT 403454 2841 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 48.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405067 405068 6/16/2016 6/16/2016 132597 MIXMI BRANDS INC. 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP Continued... 273.75 MIRROR ASSEMBLY 00005392 403633 541768F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 273.75 405069 6/16/2016 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/23/16 403565 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 405070 6/16/2016 102776 MRPA 129.00 FACILITY ENERGY COURSE 368393 BRAEMAR ARENA 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENAADMINISTRATION 129.00 405071 6/16/2016 121233 NARDINI FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,792.00 CHANGE ORDER #1 403389 JB00011914 4620.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Fire Suppression 3,551.47 FIRE SUPPRESION - PUBLIC WORKS 403387 JB00011920 4620.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Fire Suppression 5,216.00 FIRE SUPPRESION - CITY HALL 403388 JB00011948 4620.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Fire Suppression 11,559.47 405072 6/16/2016 130453 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 43.06 WEB ADVERTISING 403455 INV-088346 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 43.07 WEB ADVERTISING 403455 INV-088346 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 43.07 WEB ADVERTISING 403455 INV-088346 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 129.20 405073 6/16/2016 117098 NELSON, COLIN 375.00 MUSIC IN EDINA 403634 060916 2611.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MUSIC IN EDINA 375.00 405074 6/16/2016 100763 NEOPOST USA INC 228.79 RENTAL & MAINTENANCE 403390 53928866 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 228.79 405075 6/16/2016 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 301.50 403535 110667 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,589.54 403319 110668 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,891.04 405076 6/16/2016 138540 NIETO, RODOLFO 120.00 MODEL 403635 061016 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405076 6/16/2016 138540 NIETO, RODOLFO Continued... 120.00 405077 6/16/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 731.67 FIELD LIGHTS 00001105 403636 96506 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 731.67 405078 6/16/2016 138551 NOBLE, GARY 10.70 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403637 4301 62ND ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 10.70 405079 6/16/2016 138553 O'CONNELL, KATE 10.50 BRAEMAR CARD 403638 REFUND 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 10.50 405080 6/16/2016 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 32.79- CREDIT 403392 838212535001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 16.98- CREDIT 403393 838212536001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 116.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 403391 84046267300 5511.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 66.99 405081 6/16/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 29.42 ZIPLINE PARTS 00002150 403456 581563 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 29.42 405082 6/16/2016 102265 OLSON, TIM 155.73 UNIFORM PURCHASE 403394 060516 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 155.73 405083 6/16/2016 137703 OPG-3 INC. 3,179.84 LASERFICHE SCANNER 403395 1272 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 3,179.84 405084 6/16/2016 100060 PALAY DISPLAY INDUSTRIES INC 90.54 HANGERS 403396 368551 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 90.54 405085 6/16/2016 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 282.00 403536 16113 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 282.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405086 6/16/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 208.20 403260 8550039-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,855.76 403537 8550873-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 795.50 403320 8550883-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,859.46 405087 6/16/2016 124366 PEARSON, JACK 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/28/16 403567 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 405088 6/16/2016 118749 PENN CONTRACTING INC. 206,936.56 SEWER REHAB - PMT NO. 1 403639 ENG 16-8 03493.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Presidents Neighborhood 206,936.56 405089 6/16/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 3,039.86 403459 472075980 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,369.50- 403458 47207631 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 205.96 403457 47207655 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 469.80 403640 47207822 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 488.00 403261 53942822 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,834.12 405090 6/16/2016 131339 PETROVIC, FRANK 9.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403641 061016 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 14.58 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403641 061016 1280.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 19.98 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403641 061016 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARKADMIN. GENERAL 23.76 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403641 061016 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 38.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403641 061016 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 4.86 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403641 061016 2611.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MUSIC IN EDINA 31.86 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403641 061016 5310.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POOL ADMINISTRATION 14.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403641 061016 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 157.14 405091 6/16/2016 135849 PETSMART #2412 63.99 K9 FOOD 00003039 403642 T-2560 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 66.99 00003050 403643 T-5326 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 130.98 405092 6/16/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 760.64- 403321 236787 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 26.70- 403548 238555 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice 8., Summary 6/16/2016 - 6/16/2016 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Page - 23 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405092 6/16/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 1,073.63 403263 2985539 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,117.07 403262 2985542 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.32 403543 2990039 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .20 403546 2990040 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.32 403538 2990042 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,202.85 403540 2990050 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,517.73 403541 2990051 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,529.08 403539 2990052 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,765.40 403545 2990056 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.16 403547 2990057 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,079.58 403544 2990058 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,758.53 403542 2990059 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15,326.53 405093 6/16/2016 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 6,485.77 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 403460 061016 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 6,485.77 405094 6/16/2016 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 4.00 403462 609425-5/16 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 38.14 403461 622833-5/13 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 42.14 405095 6/16/2016 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 160.00 BLADE SHARPENING 403397 277707 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 160.00 406096 6/16/2016 108540 PROFESSIONAL TURF & RENOVATION 860.00 FERTILIZER 00001100 403652 353994 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 860.00 405097 6/16/2016 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 72.00 403322 K-1701351 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 72.00 403323 K-17149702 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 144.00 405098 6/16/2016 125936 REINDERS INC. 729.00 FERTILIZER 00001084 403653 3038554-00 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 729.00 FERTILIZER 00001101 403654 3038701-00 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,458.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405098 405099 6/16/2016 6/16/2016 125936 REINDERS INC. 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 Continued... 37,184.67 RECYCLING 403655 4106894 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 37,184.67 405100 6/16/2016 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 320.39 SOFTENER SALT 403464 00334380 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 917.52 SOFTENER SALT 403400 00334381 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,237.91 405101 6/16/2016 138541 RUDIN, JACOB 135.00 MODEL 403656 061016 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 135.00 405102 6/16/2016 122272 RUOHONIEMI, JANE 50.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/27/16 403677 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50.00 405103 6/16/2016 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 150.00 OAK WILT INSPECTIONS 403401 910139801 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 150.00 405104 6/16/2016 124789 SABBY, TINA 50.00 GOLF REFUND 403658 AMELIA REYES 5401.4591 GREEN FEES EIGHTEEN HOLES GOLF REVENUES 50.00 GOLF REFUND 403657 CATE MOE 5401.4591 GREEN FEES EIGHTEEN HOLES GOLF REVENUES 100.00 405105 6/16/2016 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 124.21 RECYCLING PARTS WASHER 403402 R002274468 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.21 405106 6/16/2016 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 2,300.00 SCISSOR LIFT TRAINING 403403 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,300.00 405107 6/16/2016 103015 SCHEERER, JOHN 110.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 403659 060716 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 110.00 405108 6/16/2016 118092 SCHMIDT, JIM R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 — 6/16/2016 Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Page - 25 Business Unit 405108 6/16/2016 118092 SCHMIDT, JIM Continued... 64.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 403404 060616 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 64.00 405109 6/16/2016 101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH 115.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403660 060816 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 115.75 405110 6/16/2016 114513 SEMPLE RECYCLING & CRUSHING 10,000.00 MATERIAL CRUSHING 403661 4333 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 20,129.40 MATERIAL CRUSHING 403661 4333 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15,000.00 MATERIAL CRUSHING 403661 4333 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 45,129.40 405111 6/16/2016 101926 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 40.00 WORKSHOP 403465 200002488 1263.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENVIRONMENT 40.00 405112 6/16/2016 138549 SHOVELIN, BETTY 137.51 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403662 4425 DUNBERRY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 137.51 405113 6/16/2016 120784 SIGN PRO 24.00 HANGING SIGNS 403466 10508 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 24.00 405114 6/16/2016 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 2,533.33 FIRE SUPPRESSION -SERVER/AV 00042916 403405 82468565 4620.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Fire Suppression 2,533.33 405115 6/16/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 73.39 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001125 403663 76155713 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 73.39 405116 6/16/2016 132195 SMALL LOT MN 276.15 403264 7677 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 276.15 405117 6/16/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 411.51 HOSE PICK, TESTER ADAPTERS 00005363 403406 ARV/29119789 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.58 PRESSURE CUP 00005355 403407 ARV/29150323 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405117 405118 6/16/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY Continued... 6/16/2016 431.09 150.00 TRAINING ROOM RENTAL 403467 9313 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 405119 6/16/2016 138468 SOUTHERN COATING SYSTEMS LLC 500.00 RUBBER SURFACING REPAIR 403235 5231 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 500.00 405120 6/16/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 187.20 403266 1413255 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,076.00 403265 1413257 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 28.00 403326 1416261 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 321.84 403325 1416263 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 126.73 403333 1416266 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,360.76 403550 1416267 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,576.86 403324 1416268 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 240.80 403549 1416269 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.60 403329 1416270 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,943.20 403328 1416271 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,939.61 403330 1416272 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 278.80 403332 1416273 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,442.73 403327 1416274 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 96.80 403331 1416275 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 216.00 403551 1417010 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 210.00 403552 1417011 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 24,046.93 405121 6/16/2016 138552 SPIESS, NICOLE 50.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 403664 REIMBURSE 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 50.99 405122 6/16/2016 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 375.05 DIVOT TOOLS 403469 0000778645 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 375.05 405123 6/16/2016 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 2,285.09 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 403409 053116 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,285.10 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 403409 053116 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 -- 6/16/2016 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Page - 27 Business Unit 405123 6/16/2016 101007 STAR TRIBUNE Continued... 2,285.10 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 403409 053116 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 6,855.29 405124 6/16/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 163.75 403335 11143 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 126.00 403334 11144 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 289.75 405125 6/16/2016 124631 STUART C. IRBY CO. 378.80 RAIN GEAR 00001072 403410 S009613263.001 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 378.80 405126 6/16/2016 121681 SUMMIT 675.00 HOOK UP FIRE ALARM PANEL 403411 2104721 4620.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Fire Suppression 675.00 405127 6/16/2016 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 500.00 MOVIE RENTAL 403236 DB2186258 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 550.00 MOVIE RENTAL 403665 DB2188819 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1,050.00 405128 6/16/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 550.93 CONCESSION PRODUCT 403470 606031616 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 302.82 403471 606060640 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 353.67 CONCESSION PRODUCT 403472 606071537 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,207.42 406129 6/16/2016 128347 TKO WINES INC. 151.20 403553 3651 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 151.20 405130 6/16/2016 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 65.32 WELDING SUPPLIES 403412 10136484 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 65.32 405131 6/16/2016 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 853.12 CHECK REZNOR UNIT 403414 17409 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 635.00 ROOFTOP UNIT REPAIR 403413 17420 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,488.12 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/16/2016 - 6/16/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405132 6/16/2016 116535 TRAVELERS Continued... 217.50 DEDUCTIBLE 403473 000503080 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 217.50 405133 6/16/2016 108660 TWIN CITIES FLAG SOURCE INC. 62.50 UNTANGLE FLAG CABLE 403237 29372 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 62.50 405134 6/16/2016 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 167.97 FIELD PAINT 00001075 403416 1501-004881 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 167.97 405135 6/16/2016 121153 UNIVERSITY OF MN ALUMNI BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/13/16 403667 CENTENNIAL 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE LAKES 150.00 405136 6/16/2016 137463 VACANTI, MIA 87.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 403668 060816 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 87.70 405137 6/16/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 309.56 LIQUOR BAGS 403669 388327-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 92.68 LINERS, TOWELS, PLATES 403670 388328-00 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 763.50 TOWELS, CAN LINERS, SOAP 403475 388923-00 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 78.52 CAN LINERS 403474 388923-01 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 1,244.26 405138 6/16/2016 122716 VANDER VORT, KIM 40.00 CANCELLATION 374574 GOLF REFUNDS 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 69.00 CANCELLATION 374574 GOLF REFUNDS 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 110.00 CANCELLATION 374574 GOLF REFUNDS 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 219.00 405139 6/16/2016 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 2,214.50 JUNE 2016 SERVICE 403417 45589 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,214.50 405140 6/16/2016 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 540.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION 403418 SP010542 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 540.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 - Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405140 405141 6/16/2016 6/16/2016 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. Continued... 422.78 ELEC SUPPLIES FOR NEW VFD 00001080 403419 1456854 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 422.78 405142 6/16/2016 132751 WARNING LITES OF MN 175.28 VALLEY VIEW TRAFFIC CONTROL 00001032 403481 156518 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 115.28 VALLEY VIEWTRAFFIC CONTROL 403482 156740 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 290.56 405143 6/16/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 4,540.00 403337 7083452 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 71.16 403271 7083922 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 194.32 403338 7084283 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.16 403561 7085021 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,551.60 403558 7085022 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 837.79 403559 7085026 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,689.39 403560 7085027 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13,885.42 405144 6/16/2016 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 45.64 RECEPTACLES 403476 13254600 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 45.64 405145 6/16/2016 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 13,183.00 TRACY AVE - PHASE 2 403478 13-01686-640 01399.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON TRACY AVE 666.66 GIS/AMS SERVICES 403480 3-01686-700 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 666.68 GIS/AMS SERVICES 403480 3-01686-700 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 666.66 GIS/AMS SERVICES" 403480 3-01686-700 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 474.50 VALLEY VIEW PED BRIDGE 403479 6-01686-650 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 7,054.00 SOUTHDALE TRANSPORTATION STUDY 403477 8-01686-670 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 22,711.50 405146 6/16/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY 38.09 51-0011004217-3 403240 502479162 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,039.45 51-4966303-6 403671 503265869 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 185.62 51-6137136-8 403283 503285514 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 37.61 51-0194596-8 403239 503370940 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,417.79 51-6979948-4 403282 503473439 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,498.09 51-6979948-4 403282 503473439 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:37 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/16/2016 — Inv No 6/16/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405146 6/16/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 1,549.89 51-6979948-4 403282 503473439 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 337.10 51-9422326-6 403238 503498586 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 3,391.03 51-6840050-6 403672 503642146 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 5,511.05 51-6121102-5 403674 504005540 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7,163.67 51-6824328-7 403673 504019418 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 23,169.39 405147 6/16/2016 135794 XCELIGENT INC. 990.00 MN CAR SUBSCRIPTION 2016 403241 236019 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 990.00 MN CAR SUBSCRIPTION 2016 403241 236019 9232.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,980.00 405148 6/16/2016 137916 Z ITALIANO 50.00- REFUND 403675 053116 1120.4391 OTHER FEES ADMINISTRATION 516.38 REFUND 403675 053116 1490.4171 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE PUBLIC HEALTH 1,666.66 REFUND 403675 053116 1400.4131 WINE LICENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,133.04 405149 6/16/2016 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 273.50 403562 16936 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 106.50 403563 16937 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 380.00 405150 6/16/2016 101531 ZINN, BOBO 142.12 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 403676 053116 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 142.12 1,194,690.65 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 783,278.83 411,411.82 1,194,690.65 Financetir - :or ,411111Vis4L R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/2016 13:17:49 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/16/2016 - 6/16/2016 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 117,071.46 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 474.50 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 858.81 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 124,055.15 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 11,429.84 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,291.37 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 397.58 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 6,303.30 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 39,190.59 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 10,907.44 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 2,142.40 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 674.68 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,128.80 05800 LIQUOR FUND 203,666.26 05900 UTILITY FUND 280,062.60 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 972.66 05950 RECYCLING FUND 37,184.67 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 282,861.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,526.28 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 16,489.00 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 46,625.37 09900 PAYROLL FUND 4,376.89 Report Totals 1,194,690.65 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polyes Tfld pro duAe;re te (1'ICeLe> R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3281 6/23/2016 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 244.10 BUTTERFLY VALVE 00005368 403680 0147832-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 244.10 3282 6/23/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 53.60 403796 2009698 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 33.60 404003 2010133 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 110.40 403795 2010140 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 47.20 404004 2010145 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 111.20 404002 2011471 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 356.00 3283 6/23/2016 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 3,272.15 RUBBER FLOORING 404191 1001978 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,272.15 3284 6/23/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,140.30 403805 53985800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 28.30 404007 54083100 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 267.10 404239 54084400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \MNE YORK SELLING 375.94 404009 6665200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7.53 403806 94068800 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 122.29 404241 94069100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 63.99 404008 94105900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 182.01 404240 94106200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,187.46 3285 6/23/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 45.52- RETURN 403964 CP-WO-205626-1- 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1 37.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 404087 OE-422615-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 150.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 403890 WO-204682-1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 63.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003058 403692 WO-205626-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 97.56 00003059 403693 WO-205925-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 139.45 WHITE BOARDS 403889 WO-206577-1 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 442.33 3286 6/23/2016 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 183.00 DOOR/HINGE REPAIR 404193 S91471 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 183.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 -- 6/23/2016 Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 2 Business Unit 3287 6/23/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS Continued... 53.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 403694 118847 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 39.55 403695 119491 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 93.40 3288 6/23/2016 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 60.12 FILTERS 00005299 403696 1054945 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 326.11 KITS, BRAKES, VALVE 00005431 403698 1063625 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.96 CLEVIS YOKES 00005433 403699 1064235 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.96 CLEVIS KITS 00005433 403697 1064397 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.86 HOSE ASSEMBLY, CAP 00005409 403965 1064560 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 530.01 3289 6/23/2016 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 79.07 OCE MAINTENANCE 403700 988680929 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 79.07 3290 6/23/2016 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 367.64 FILTERS 00007501 404199 519020 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 450.80 DISINFECTANT 404200 519021 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 818.44 3291 6/23/2016 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 370.18 XCEL ENERGY BILL 00001165 403896 6486 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 370.18 3292 6/23/2016 105693 CITYSPRINT 13.75 COURIER SERVICE 404205 36897 1100.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY COUNCIL 13.75 3293 6/23/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 174.00 404020 67-265 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 174.00 3294 6/23/2016 101345 COLOURS 7,500.00 ABOUT TOWN DESIGN 404103 10502 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 3,870.00 WATER REPORT 404104 10503 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 11,370.00 3295 6/23/2016 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 990.00 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 403703 7070225931 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3295 6/23/2016 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. Continued-. 990.00 3296 6/23/2016 104020 DALCO 205.91 WIPERS, NITRILE GLOVES 00001099 403707 3032677 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 67.68 DISINFECTANT SPRAY 00001099 403708 3034821 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 273.59 3297 6/23/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 149.50 AD FOR BID 404210 352501 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 72.00 PUBLISH NOTICE 404212 355758 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 126.50 AD FOR BID 404211 355759 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 46.00 PUBLISH NOTICE 404213 355760 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 149.50 PUBLISH ORD 2016-06 404214 355761 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 253.00 PUBLISH ORD 2016-07 404215 355762 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 138.00 AD FOR BID 404216 358910 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 355.00 AQUATIC CENTER AD 404110 362997 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOLADMINISTRATION 310.00 AQUATIC CENTER AD 404109 362998 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,599.50 3298 6/23/2016 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 394.84 AD FOR BID 404219 742743773 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 133.86 AD FOR BID 404220 742763564 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 161.21 AD FOR BID 404221 742777967 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 689.91 3299 6/23/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 2,295.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002566 403916 14479 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 4,845.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002571 403915 14480 01438.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 Recon White Oaks C 9,285.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002580 404293 14481 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 16,425.00 3300 6/23/2016 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 144.25 BUNKER REPAIRS 403980 227031 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 144.25 3301 6/23/2016 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 60.56 TOILET RENTAL 404130 102593 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 60.56 3302 6/23/2016 101792 LUBE-TECH R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3302 6/23/2016 101792 LUBE-TECH Continued... 75.00 USED OIL PICKUP 403982 789256 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.00 3303 6/23/2016 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 4,639.40 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 1160.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE 86.61 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5110.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 65.76 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5210.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 116.22 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5310.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT POOL ADMINISTRATION 339.46 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5410.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 330.37 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5510.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ARENAADMINISTRATION 91.30 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5552.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 205.35 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5710.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 135.34 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5760.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 252.20 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5820.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT 50TH STREET GENERAL 578.14 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5860.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 658.11 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5840.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,752.42 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5902.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 249.32 2015 AUDIT 403919 40188 5932.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GENERAL STORM SEWER 9,500.00 3304 6/23/2016 101483 MENARDS 92.93 HOSE 00006046 403920 14347 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 8.43 SHELF, BRACKETS 403747 14538 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 11.57 HAMMER 00006054 403921 14956 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 22.99 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001107 403748 15128 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 11.67 CAULKING, BLACKTOP CRACK FILL 00001112 403749 15326 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 20.00 SUPPLIES 00007501 404225 15453 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 74.65 SUPPLIES 00007501 404225 15453 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 17.10 CONCRETE MIX 00001128 403751 15542 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 187.94 EROSION CONTROL SOCKS 00001135 403750 15657 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 13.10 SCRAPER, RAZORS, OUTLET 00002150 404135 15906 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 134.85 PRUNERS, LOPER, RAKE 00001144 403922 15921 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 8.78 PVC ENCLOSURE 00001146 404136 15924 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 36.44 BROOMS, MOP HEADS 00002150 404137 16079 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 59.98 HOSE ASSEMBLIES 00001202 404138 16097 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 700.43 3305 6/23/2016 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 604.71 HYDRAULIC MOTORS 00006051 403932 1067672-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 225.38 FILTERS, ELEMENTS 00006058 403933 1068751-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 -- Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3305 6/23/2016 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. Continued... 830.09 3306 6/23/2016 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 68,779.62 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404296 SEWER 01422.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A IMPROVEMENTS 4,750.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404296 SEWER 01438.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2016 Recon White Oaks C IMPROVEMENTS 18,145.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404296 SEWER 03492.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Morningside A & White Oaks C IMPROVEMENTS 2,926.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404296 SEWER 04416.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Morningside A & White Oaks C IMPROVEMENTS 94,600.62 3307 6/23/2016 129485 PAPCO INC. 27.77 CLEANER 403935 97336 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 27.77 3308 6/23/2016 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. 358.98 POWERLOAD REPAIRS 403990 1001247 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 358.98 3309 6/23/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 434.19 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 404160 10057 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 461.56 DISINFECTANT, TOWELS, LINERS 00002217 404161 10099 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 106.32 PAPER PLATES 404162 10156 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,002.07 3310 6/23/2016 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC. 264.00 RELOCATE ALARM PANEL 404163 75797 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 264.00 3311 6/23/2016 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 69.50 403836 16-6306 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 69.50 3312 6/23/2016 101015 STREICHERS 850.00 BALL. VEST 404172 11212012 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 104.97 UNIFORMS 403946 11212563 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.99 UNIFORM 404173 11213242 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT, GENERAL 1,105.96 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 — Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3312 3313 6/23/2016 6/23/2016 101015 STREICHERS 103277 TITAN MACHINERY Continued... 1,082.16 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 403775 645158 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 524.58 MACHINE REPAIRS 404183 650289 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,606.74 3314 6/23/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 69.79 TANK 403948 0139508 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 69.79 3315 6/23/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 127.50 403841 0153759-IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 127.50 403842 0153761-IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 250.00 404064 0154357-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.00 404065 0154358-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 110.00 404065 0154358-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 655.00 3316 6/23/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 424.40 403843 428011-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 392.40 403844 428255-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,478.15 404066 428607-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 952.00 404280 428610-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,246.95 405151 6/17/2016 138573 ENGEN, GREG 1,300.18 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 403870 061616 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1,300.18 405152 6/17/2016 138467 JUST US CONSTRUCTION & RESTORATION INC. 8,642.66 STRUCTURE REPAIRS 50% 403871 3371 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 8,642.66 405153 6/17/2016 138572 SAUERESSIG, ZACH 50.00- Z ITALIAN° 403872 LICENSE REFUND 1120.4391 OTHER FEES ADMINISTRATION 516.38 Z ITALIAN° 403872 LICENSE REFUND 1490.4171 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE PUBLIC HEALTH 1,666.66 Z ITALIANO 403872 LICENSE REFUND 1400.4131 WINE LICENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,133.04 405154 6/23/2016 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 -- Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405154 6/23/2016 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM Continued... 315.00 SAFETY DRIVING COURSE 404074 061616 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 315.00 405155 6/23/2016 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 394.18 HOSE, COUPLINGS, GASKETS 00005432 403679 1-874789 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 394.18 405156 6/23/2016 138555 ACCELA INC. 9,550.00 EDINA TO GO APP SERVICES 403681 1682 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 750.00 EDINA TO GO APP SERVICES 403681 1682 5924.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 750.00 EDINA TO GO APP SERVICES 403681 1682 5925.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 750.00 EDINA TO GO APP SERVICES 403681 1682 5960.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 11,800.00 405157 6/23/2016 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 41.81 FIRE BARRIER CAULK 00001077 403682 482644 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 18.67 VENT 00001114 403961 484984 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 60.48 405158 6/23/2016 129458 ACME TOOLS 469.99 TOOL 404076 4128184 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 358.00 TOOLS, SUPPLIES 403962 4205548 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 191.99 BATTERY PACK, AIR HOSE 403963 4214749 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 198.00 CORDLESS DRILL 00005373 403683 4215793 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.44 DRILL BIT 00001143 404075 4233177 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,344.42 405159 6/23/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 119.51 SHOES 404077 902567333 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 373.48 HATS 404078 902588873 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 492.99 405160 6/23/2016 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 326.82 CO2 404079 33017643 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 326.82 405161 6/23/2016 112033 ALLDATA 1,500.00 DATA PROGRAM RENEWAL 403684 FW270363-2016 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,500.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405162 6/23/2016 135195 ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP Continued... 155.00 MAY 2016 COBRAADMIN 404080 C37521 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 155.00 405163 6/23/2016 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 105.51 CREAMER PACKETS 404081 156686 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 130.75 COFFEE 404082 48099 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 236.26 405164 6/23/2016 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 251.94 403782 053116 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 345.87 403782 053116 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 556.30 403782 053116 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 91.77 403782 053116 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 120.77 403782 053116 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 128.19 403782 053116 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 1,494.84 405165 6/23/2016 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 125.20 UNIFORM PURCHASE 404083 061616 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 125.20 405166 6/23/2016 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 1,657.99 REPAIR PIPE BREAKS 404084 44877 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,657.99 405167 6/23/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 908.50 403801 3105429 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 142.50 404005 3106933 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 142.50 404238 3106934 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 999.50 404237 3106936 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,504.50 404006 3106937 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 32.28- 403803 343521 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8.52 403797 346616 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7.00 403798 346617 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7.00 403799 346618 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 27.82 403800 346619 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 22.16- 403802 347131 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 37.62- 403804 347540 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,655.78 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 - 6/23/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 9 Business Unit 405168 6/23/2016 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS Continued... 283.62 1-146354 403888 060116 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 283.62 405169 6/23/2016 120995 AVR INC. 1,611.50 READY MIX CONCRETE 00001254 403685 129229 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 993.00 403686 129331 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 2,470.00 403687 129404 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,744.00 403688 129685 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 2,918.50 403689 129794 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,114.00 403690 129901 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 10,851.00 405170 6/23/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 131.97 BATTERIES 00001120 403691 020-348088 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 131.97 405171 6/23/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 864.00 PIZZA 404086 4637150 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 288.00 PIZZA 404085 4637712 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,152.00 405172 6/23/2016 108670 BERNER, JIM 150.00 FARMER'S MARKET 7/07/16 404068 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405173 6/23/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 143.00 404192 301639 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 622.67 403807 301645 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 327.96 403808 301647 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 312.60 404242 302982 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,406.23 405174 6/23/2016 138582 BIG EPIC SHOW 237.50 CL PERFORMANCE 7/07/16 404072 060616 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 237.50 405175 6/23/2016 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 3,820.73 HOT MIX 404088 25538 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,820.73 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 -- Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405176 6/23/2016 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES Continued... 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL 403891 JUNE2016-2 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 386.00 405177 6/23/2016 138592 BLUEBIRD NURSERY INC. 443.12 FLOWERS/PLANTS 404194 224534 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 1,983.56 FLOWERS/PLANTS 404194 224534 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,426.68 405178 6/23/2016 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,332.97 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003718 404089 82176604 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,332.97 405179 6/23/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 739.56 403809 134400 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 388.50 404010 134531 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 529.00 404243 134532 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 917.50 404011 134554 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 2,574.56 405180 6/23/2016 138588 BOYEA, DEIDRE 23.73 DOME TIME MISCHARGE 404195 REFUND 5550.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 326.27 DOME TIME MISCHARGE 404195 REFUND 5551.4551 BUILDING RENTAL SPORTS DOME REVENUE 350.00 405181 6/23/2016 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 359.77 PHOTOS 403966 2085 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 359.77 405182 6/23/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 748.86 404017 1080482397 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 683.15 403810 1080482398 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,788.20 404016 1080485312 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 146.30 404015 1080485313 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 725.28 404014 1080485364 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,176.34 404013 1080485365 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 392.67 404012 1080485366 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 678.82 404245 1080485367 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,015.50 404246 1080485368 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 33.07 404247 1080485369 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 605.63 404248 1080485370 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 - 6/23/2016 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 11 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405182 6/23/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 927.11 404249 1080485371 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE YORK SELLING 512.05 404244 1080485515 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17,432.98 405183 6/23/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 4,845.95 403813 1090573464 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 152.40 403812 1090573465 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 625.25 404018 1090573466 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,775.16 403811 1090573467 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,325.05 404250 1090574324 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 69.00 404251 1090574325 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 72.40 404251 1090574325 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 13,865.21 405184 6/23/2016 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 1,924.86 GOLF BALLS 404090 1002502697 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 677.18 GOLF BALLS 404091 1002509393 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,602.04 405185 6/23/2016 105295 BRIGHT GUY.COM 236.72 RIT FLASHLIGHTS 00003809 404092 517015 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 236.72 405186 6/23/2016 114575 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIES INC. 199.00 COOLING TOWELS 00001023 403892 T30266 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 199.00 405187 6/2312016 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 945.46 GOLF CLUBS 404093 926874557 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 759.15 IRONS 404094 926878302 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,704,61 405188 6/23/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3,996.90 404252 00011190 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 187.60 403815 923555 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,998.70 404019 929768 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 285.00 403814 934278 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,468.20 405189 6/23/2016 138589 CARLIN, BRADLEY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 - 6/23/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405189 6/23/2016 138589 CARLIN, BRADLEY Continued... 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/06/16 404196 061716 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405190 6/23/2016 100678 CARLSON PRINTING CO. 1,285.60 POSTCARDS, APPLICATIONS 404095 00105374 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1,285.60 405191 6/23/2016 138593 CAUBLE, CONNIE 67.95 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404285 5700 LOIS LANE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 67.95 405192 6/23/2016 129923 CAWLEY 46.16 NAME BADGES 404197 V377970 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 46.16 405193 6/23/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 98.91 612 E77-0056 403893 0056-6/16 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 62.77 403787 0146-5/16 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 172.92 403787 0146-5/16 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 175.15 403787 0146-5/16 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 314.51 403787 0146-5/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 304.00 403787 0146-5/16 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 59.06 403787 0146-5/16 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 38.54 403787 0146-5/16 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 590.03 612 E01-0426 403783 0426-6/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 104.90 612 E23-0652 403894 0652-6/16 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 60.88 952 835-1161 403785 1161-6/16 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 161.20 952 285-2951 404096 2951-6/16 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 214.79 952 835-6661 403786 6661-6/16 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 590.03 612 E12-6797 403784 6797-6/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,947.69 405194 6/23/2016 135835 CENTURYLINK 1,335.45 612-008-2053-053 404097 2053-6/16 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 1,335.45 405195 6/23/2016 100683 CHEMSEARCH 666.08 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 404198 2339549 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 666.08 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405196 6/23/2016 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS Continued... 100.00 PHONE/INTERNET 403895 COM-0895 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 405197 6/23/2016 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 2,017.20 00077479-0113317143 404098 113317143-6/16 5720.6189 SEWER & WATER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 565.39 00103650-0155252016 404101 155252016-6/16 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER PSTF OCCUPANCY 88.37 00079303-0155300009 404202 155300009-6/16 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,096.50 00079303-0155300010 404203 155300010-6/16 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 417.22 00079303-0155300018 404201 155300018-6/16 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 140.16 00121140-0155300028 404204 155300028-6/16 5520.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA CONCESSIONS 236.58 00113607-0170005201 404100 170005201-6/16 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,561.42 405198 6/23/2016 126726 COBRA PUMA GOLF INC. 867.11 APPAREL 404102 G898688 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 867.11 405199 6/23/2016 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 316.00 404253 0148591123 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 316.00 405200 6/23/2016 120433 COMCAST 24.86 8772 10 614 0023973 404290 23973-6/16 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 26.07 8772 10 614 0496856 404105 496856-6/16 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 310.78 8772 10 614 0540372 404206 540372-6/16 5552.6188 TELEPHONE SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 361.71 405201 6/23/2016 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 1,085.20 GOLF COURSE ADVERTISING 404106 CW4413 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,085.20 405202 6/23/2016 124118 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 294.90 RADIATOR REPAIR 404284 23656 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 294.90 405203 6/23/2016 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 257.24 REBAR, MOTAR, EDGER 00001078 403702 0141288-IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 229.72 CONCRETE TOOLS 00001108 403701 0141543-IN 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 486.96 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 — 6/23/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405204 6/23/2016 137004 CR-BPS INC. Continued... 13,295.00 ASSETS MANAGEMENT 403704 EDINA001-11 45007.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EXHAUST REMOVAL SYSTEM 13,295.00 405205 6/23/2016 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 3,506.26 UNIFORM SHIRTS 404107 48242 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 3,506.26 405206 6/23/2016 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 92.00 APR 2016 WASHES 403705 446669 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.00 405207 6/23/2016 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 20.48 114-09855685-4 403897 9855685-5/16 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 20.48 405208 6/23/2016 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 700.00 GROOMER FRAME 00005263 403706 168333 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 700.00 405209 6/23/2016 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 1,679.31 APPAREL 404108 93419277 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,679.31 405210 6/23/2016 134475 D R HORTON INC 2,500.00 ED144835 REFUND ESCROW 404288 5713 ZENITH AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 405211 6/23/2016 138575 DAKOTA REV 134.09 REV TURF PRO 403898 10637 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 134.09 405212 6/23/2016 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 44.59 PROBE KIT, TEST LEADS 00005269 403710 100163 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.12 FASTENER DRIVE, BALL DRIVE SET00005367 403709 100847 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.29 HAMMER 00005337 403712 100854 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.38 BRAKE FLUID TESTER 00005190 403711 97903 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 269.38 405213 6/23/2016 138570 DEIVIANN, MICHAEL 1,971.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 403886 36867240 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 — Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405213 6/23/2016 138570 DEMANN, MICHAEL Continued... 1,971.00 405214 6/23/2016 136484 DIEBEL, MIKE 504.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 404207 061516 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 504.00 405215 6/23/2016 121103 DIRECTV 186.18 016523692 404291 28751118356 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 186.18 405216 6/23/2016 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2,500.00 ED147616 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 404289 4200 OAKDALE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS AVE 2,500.00 405217 6/23/2016 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 203.50 TRADEMARK MATTERS 404208 041216 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 203.50 405218 6123/2016 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 1,588.75 CHEMICALS 00005328 403899 827000667-16 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,645.37 CHEMICALS 403900 827000668-16 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,234.12 405219 6/23/2016 138560 DREIS, MICHAEL 18.52 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403874 6332 LIMERICK 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LANE 18.52 405220 6/23/2016 136031 DUCHON, SUSAN S. 250.00 COMMISSIONS 404209 061716 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 585.00 COMMISSIONS 404209 061716 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 835.00 405221 6/23/2016 122388 EDEN PRAIRIE POLICE DEPARTMENT 200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 403901 REGIONAL 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL RESPONSE 200.00 405222 6/23/2016 103594 EDINALARM INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 - 6/23/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405222 6/23/2016 103594 EDINALARM INC. Continued_ 436.05 ALARM MONITORING 403902 105889 5422.6250 ALARM SERVICE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 436.05 405223 6/23/2016 138567 EDLUND, MELISSA 163.06 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403881 5904 JOSEPHINE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 163.06 405224 6/23/2016 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 591.25 GRANDVIEW TIF 404112 70619 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 531.25 SOUTHDALE TIF 404111 70620 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 1,122.50 405225 6/23/2016 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,022.58 SQUAD BUILDS 403967 R54359 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,022.58 405226 6/23/2016 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 165.87 403816 5724 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 165.87 403817 5754 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 165.87 404021 5805 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 497.61 405227 6/23/2016 138686 EVANS, MARCIA 13.31 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404217 6008 SHANE DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 13.31 405228 6/23/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 66.08 FUEL FILTER 403713 69-226545 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 317.60 PLUGS, FILTERS, TENSIONER 403716 69-226763 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.03 TENSIONER 403718 69-226781 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.44 BELT 403715 69-226796 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.80 A/TRANS DEXRON 403719 69-226832 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.11- CREDIT 403973 69-226857 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.70 SPARK PLUGS 403970 69-226911 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.12 ANTIFREEZE 403720 69-226928 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.70 SPARK PLUGS 403968 69-227085 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 248.14 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES 403971 69-227451 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.56 FILTERS 403972 69-227645 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.03 GASKET 403717 75-222469 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.76 A/TRANS DEXRON 403714 75-222514 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 — 6/23/2016 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 17 Business Unit 405228 6/23/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 51.73 BRAKE LINING KIT 403969 75-223161 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 979.58 405229 6/23/2016 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,248.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 404218 061516 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,248.00 405230 6/23/2016 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE 272.22 COFFEE 404113 968293 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 272.22 405231 6/23/2016 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 129.49 GOJO, CABLE TIES, TAPE 403974 MNTC2137608 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 129.49 405232 6/23/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 3,906.68 METERS 00001164 403904 0194655-1 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 100.56 TOUCH PAD INSTALLATION 00001163 403903 0196154 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,007.24 405233 6/23/2016 133527 FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT CO. 425.00 ALARM SYSTEM SERVICE CALL 403721 11932 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 425.00 405234 6/23/2016 119211 FIRSTLAB 236.90 DRUG TESTING 404114 FL00149976 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 236.90 405235 6/23/2016 131188 FIRST-SHRED 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 404168 186067 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.80 404169 187256 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.60 405236 6/23/2016 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 1,250.00 WINDOW CLEANING 403722 2315-15470 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,250.00 405237 6/23/2016 121634 FORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 1,350.00 THERMAL ROLLS FOR SQUADS 403723 148403 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,350.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405237 405238 6/23/2016 6/23/2016 121634 FORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 130475 FUNTIME FUNKTIONS Continued... 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/05/2016 404070 061316 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 405239 6/23/2016 100764 G & K SERVICES 54.41 403788 053116 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 136.15 403788 053116 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 166.96 403788 053116 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 216.84 403788 053116 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 27.55 403788 053116 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 70.92 403788 053116 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 15.00 ACCT 0012939 403905 1006730760 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 126.16 ACCT 0039263 404116 1013752080 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 233.14 ACCT 0039263 404115 1013907220 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 1,047.13 405240 6/23/2016 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 320.93 SKORTS 404118 41137983 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 970.85 SHRITS 404117 41147758 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,291.78 405241 6/23/2016 101103 GRAINGER 106.72 SPRINKLERS 00006314 403908 9118395558 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 19.44 WATER HOSE 00006314 403906 9119190149 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 32.40 HDMI CABLES 403907 9119745520 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 168.08 PRESSURE WASHER 00006364 403909 9125610130 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 59.60 GLOVES 00006364 403910 9127432194 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 102.40 PAINT, EYE WEAR 403975 9128856557 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 45.14 CONNECTORS 00005366 403724 9129207800 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.80 TIRES 00005366 403725 9129207818 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 216.72 EYE WEAR, PAINT 403976 913026403 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 46.88 BALL VALVE 00005366 403729 9130935639 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.48 SLEEVE ANCHORS 00005369 403726 9131098734 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 166.84 HAND DRUM PUMP, DIVIDER BOX 00005369 403728 9131098742 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.42 RUBBER WHEEL 00005369 403727 9131098759 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 208.80 LEATHER SAFETY GLOVES 00001117 403731 9132026411 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 272.16 SAFETY GLASSES 00001117 403730 9132026429 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7.59 COUPLINGS 00001119 403732 9132769440 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 133.79 BALL VALVE, CONNECTORS 00005372 403733 9133468737 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 -- 6/23/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 19 Business Unit 405241 6/23/2016 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 390.82 SPORTS DRINK MIX, EYE WEAR 403977 9135353762 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,164.08 405242 6/23/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 445.50 404023 MN00005788 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 473.00 404022 MN00005792 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 918.50 405243 6/23/2016 120834 GREEN, RICK 9.01 FASTENERS 404119 061716 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 9.01 405244 6/23/2016 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 12,928.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 404222 061516 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 12,928.00 405245 6/23/2016 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 1,452.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 404223 06156 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,452.00 405246 6/23/2016 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 32.75 ROCKER SWITCH, PIN 403978 155235 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 32.75 405247 6/23/2016 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 291.98 AC PARTS 00001995 403912 PLY0506387 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 16.72- RETURN 403913 PLY0506404 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 36.18 AC PARTS 00001995 403911 PLY0506405 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 311.44 405248 6/23/2016 138300 H2OVERHAUL LLC 3,600.00 RAMP WALL CLEANING 403734 1043 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 3,600.00 405249 6/23/2016 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 179.96 250 404287 053116 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 250.00 250 404287 053116 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 868.00 250 404287 053116 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 1,297.96 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 — 6/23/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405250 6/23/2016 100797 HAWKINS INC. Continued-. 2,896.90 CHEMICALS 00005239 403735 3880053 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,174.96 CHEMICALS 00005329 403914 3892970 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 7,071.86 405251 6/23/2016 127071 HELMER PRINTING INC. 39.00 VOLUNTEER CARDS 404292 162130 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 39.00 405252 6/23/2016 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 1,185.00 TEMPO EMT REFRESHERS 403736 44779 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,185.00 405253 6/23/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,170.54 RADIO FLEET FEES 404120 1000077548 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,170.54 405254 6/23/2016 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 754.34 DESKTOP 00004335 403979 57135837 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 754.34 405255 6/23/2016 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 284.56 FOAM SOAP, SANITIZER 404121 602113758 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 284.56 405256 6/23/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,032.00 403818 830932 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,582.50 404025 832036 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 834.00 404024 832039 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 953.00 404254 832309 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,401.50 405257 6/23/2016 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 4,589.00 CAL HYPO 404122 160526057 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 403.46 CHEMICALS 404125 160527035 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,388.53 STABILIZER, PH SENSORS 404126 160531030 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,649.03 UV LIGHT REPLACEMENT 404124 SV160422022 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 37.59 TUBING 404123 SV160524079 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 8,067.61 405258 6/23/2016 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 - 6/23/2016 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 21 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405258 6/23/2016 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC Continued... 377.75 AUTO PARTS 403789 053116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 377.75 405259 6/23/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 431.00 404255 40603 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 431.00 405260 6/23/2016 138569 INGEBRAND, G.B. 101.24 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 403883 36867184 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 101.24 405261 6/23/2016 104696 INT'L SECURITY PRODUCTS 87.30 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001129 403737 3046682 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 43.10 FENCING PARTS 00001140 404127 3046703 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 130.40 405262 6/23/2016 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 875.00 SAFETY AUDIT 404128 20077066 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 4,760.00 LIFEGUARD LICENSES 404129 20077247 5310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POOL ADMINISTRATION 5,635.00 405263 6/23/2016 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 3.43 403738 5/16-FACILITIES 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 499.00 403917 5/16-PARKS 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 573.01 403917 5/16-PARKS 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 67.50 403917 5/16-PARKS 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 1,142.94 405264 6/23/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 8,900.40 403822 2510984 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 87.90 403820 2510985 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,794.35 403821 2510986 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 36.99 403819 2510987 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,611.60 404026 2537010 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8,443.46 404257 2537016 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 118.10 404256 2537017 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 25,992.80 405265 6/23/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.16 404037 5461478 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405265 6/23/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 755.08 404038 5461479 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 359.40 403823 5461481 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 38.41 403824 5461482 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 489.58 403825 5461483 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,234.41 403826 5461484 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 229.96 403827 5461485 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 338.48 403828 5461487 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5.80 404028 5467250 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 438.80 404261 5467255 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 877.44 404031 5467256 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 970.17 404260 5467258 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 923.70 404262 5467259 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,561.26 404259 5467260 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,361.51 404263 5467261 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 100.23 404264 5467262 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 8,372.18 404265 5467263 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,179.99 404258 5467264 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.32 404266 5467265 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,858.27 404029 5467269 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 95.14 404036 5467270 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,032.80 404033 5467271 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 463.68 404027 5467272 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 66.82 404034 5467273 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,444.77 404032 5467274 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,300.64 404030 5467275 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,413.62 404035 5467276 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 135.66- 404039 576489 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.75- 403829 576795 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 27.99- 404040 577040 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 45,737.22 405266 6/23/2016 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 790.00 REFRIGERANT 00001083 403981 1048484 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 790.00 405267 6/23/2016 105990 KELLY GREEN IRRIGATION INC. 31.99 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS 403739 105583 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 31.99 405268 6/23/2016 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405268 6/23/2016 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. Continued... 87.30 DOGGING KIT 404132 SI032330 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 76.80 INSTALL/SERVICE 00001060 404131 S1032331 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 164.10 405269 6/23/2016 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 764.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 404224 061516 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 764.00 405270 6/23/2016 116776 KUSTOM 'CARRIERS 176.00 VEHICLE TOWS 403740 6/8/16 STMT 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 176.00 405271 6/23/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 743.64 SCREWS, NUTS, WASHERS 00001091 403741 9304129302 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 66.72 FLAT WASHERS 00001091 403742 9304135267 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 86.27 WIRE LOOM, TERMINAL COVERS 00005401 403743 9304143355 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.74 SCREWS 00005371 403744 9304150966 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 938.37 405272 6/23/2016 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 20,361.60 MAY 2016 FEES 403745 053116 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 20,361.60 405273 6/23/2016 138545 LEAR, SAM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/03/16 404069 061016 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405274 6/23/2016 138561 LEDER, KEVIN 8.69 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403875 6004 KELLOGG 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 8.69 405275 6/23/2016 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 3,158.23 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 403918 S16209 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,158.23 405276 6/23/2016 138210 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP 90.00 MAY 2015 SERVICES 403983 060116 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 90.00 405277 6/23/2016 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 -- 6/23/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 24 Business Unit 405277 6/23/2016 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. Continued... 402.44 OXYGEN 00003649 403984 13541670 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 402.44 405278 6/23/2016 134336 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC. 139,206.64 PICKLEBALL COURT 403746 061016 47095.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ROSLAND PK- PICKLEBALL COURTS 139,206.64 405279 6/23/2016 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,616.75 GUTHRIE THEATER TRIP 404133 061316 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,616.75 405280 6/23/2016 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 215.11 RESERVOIR, KIT 00005394 403985 498641 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 215.11 405281 6/23/2016 138580 MEYERHOFER, MEHAN 50.00 GOLF LESSONS 404134 REFUND 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 50.00 405282 6/23/2016 101471 MGCSA 150.00 DUES - BRYAN SANFORD 403986 00513 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 150.00 405283 6/23/2016 122772 MINGER CONSTRUCTION INC. 376.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404295 ROUNDABOUT 07139.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Valley View & Tracy Impr 122,194.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404295 ROUNDABOUT 01430.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 58,511.45 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404295 ROUNDABOUT 05562.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Valley View & Tracy Impr 11,628.76 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404295 ROUNDABOUT 04420.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Valley View & Tracy Impr 192,710.61 405284 6/23/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 3,350.00 WATER LINE REPAIR 00002591 403923 35221 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 3,350.00 WATER LINE REPAIR 00002590 403924 35222 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 6,700.00 405285 6/23/2016 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 64.19 OXYGEN 403925 171154764 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 64.19 405286 6/23/2016 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 — 6/23/2016 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405286 6/23/2016 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION Continued... 1,197.19 YARDAGE PLATES 404139 060916 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,197.19 405287 6/23/2016 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 792.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT 403927 629430-5164 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 792.00 405288 6/23/2016 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 23.00 SB RENEWAL FEE 403928 N. BEHLEN 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 405289 6/23/2016 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 261.58 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 403929 10000013457 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE 261.58 405290 6/23/2016 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 261.58 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEES 403987 10000010423 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 261.58 405291 6/23/2016 105533 MN STATE ASSOCIATION OF NARCOTICS 150.00 CONFERENCE FEE 403926 2016 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 405292 6/23/2016 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 153.54 STORAGE RENTAL 403930 9000403231 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 153.54 405293 6/23/2016 108537 MOORE, JOEL 77.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 403752 061416 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 77.50 405294 6/23/2016 101658 MPELRA 250.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 403931 AUG 2016 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES 250.00 405295 6/23/2016 130266 MUNICODE 1,436.50 SUPPLEMENT 5 UPDATE 404226 00271005 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 1,436.50 405296 6/23/2016 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405296 6/23/2016 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS Continued... 377.65 PARTS 403790 053116 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 142.91 PARTS 403790 053116 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 520.56 405297 6/23/2016 138590 NASBY, MARK 10.91 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 404227 060916 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 150.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 404227 060916 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 160.91 405298 6/23/2016 130453 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 384.22 THEATRE ADVERTISING 403934 INV-085034 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 384.22 THEATRE ADVERTISING 403934 INV-085034 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 384.22 THEATRE ADVERTISING 403934 INV-085034 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,152.66 405299 6/23/2016 138571 NELSON, ROBERT A. 98.34 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 403887 37172031 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 98.34 405300 6/23/2016 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 169.50 403830 110666 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 169.50 405301 6/23/2016 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 60.00 RANGE SUPPLIES 404140 9408 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 30.00 RANGE SUPPLIES 404141 9414 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 90.00 405302 6/23/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC. 455.43 MANAGER UNIFORMS 404143 988167893 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 664.75 STAFF SHIRTS 404142 988167894 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,120.18 405303 6/23/2016 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 626.40 LIGHTS 00005429 403753 41377 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 626.40 405304 6/23/2016 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/10/16 404073 060616 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 75.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - 6/23/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405304 405305 6/23/2016 6/23/2016 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 103578 OFFICE DEPOT Continued... 41.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 404144 1943790207 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 41.17 405306 6/23/2016 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 25.65 404145 W16050661 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.65 404145 W16050661 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.30 404145 W16050661 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 76.95 404145 W16050661 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 76.95 404145 W16050661 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 179.55 404145 W16050661 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 282.15 404145 W16050661 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 51.30 404145 W16050661 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 25.65 404145 W16050661 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 102.60 404145 W16050661 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 115.42 404145 W16050661 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 115.43 404145 W16050661 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 51.30 404145 W16050661 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 76.95 404145 W16050661 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 76.95 404145 W16050661 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 51.30 404145 W16050661 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 271.14 404146 W16050666 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 34.84 LANGUAGE LINE 404147 W16050746 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,691.08 405307 6/23/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 46.50 ZIPLINE ROPE 00002150 404148 582514 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 46.50 405308 6/23/2016 137703 OPG-3 INC. 1,940.00 LASERFICHE IMPORTAGENT 403988 1231 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,940.00 405309 6/23/2016 136189 P&W GOLF SUPPLY LLC 203.26 GOLF BALLS 00002362 404149 INV11217 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 203.26 405310 6/23/2016 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 57,682.55 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404297 STRACHAUER PK 01421.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 — 6/23/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405310 6/23/2016 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. Continued... 41,245.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404297 STRACHAUER PK 03495.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Strachauer Park A 177,119.35 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404297 STRACHAUER PK 05560.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Strachauer Park A 158,327.55 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 404297 STRACHAUER PK 04418.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Strachauer Park A 434,374.65 405311 6/23/2016 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 2,527.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 404298 GOLF TERR 07137.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Golf Terrace B 321,297.73 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 404298 GOLF TERR 01420.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 83,912.43 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 404298 GOLF TERR 03494.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Golf Terrace B 255,911.28 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 404298 GOLF TERR 05559.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Golf Terrace B 110,120.61 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 404298 GOLF TERR 04417.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Golf Terrace B 773,769.05 405312 6/23/2016 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 298.00 404041 16102 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 298.00 405313 6/23/2016 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING 76.58 CATERED FOOD 404151 0633 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 44.88 CATERED FOOD 404150 0674 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 121.46 405314 6/23/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 830.16 403831 8550877-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,299.45 404267 8551592-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 168.20 404042 8551593-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 139.50 404043 8551657-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,437.31 405315 6/23/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 344.32 404228 47207814 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 547.42 404152 47207864 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 224.83 404153 47207910 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 279.80 404268 55531121 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,396.37 405316 6/23/2016 131877 PETTY CASH 200.00 AQUATIC CENTER 404154 061716 5300.1040 CHANGE FUND AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 200.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 - 6/23/2016 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 29 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405317 6/23/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 3.48 404269 235285 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 688.26 404044 2963766 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.16 404045 2990044 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 827.81 403833 2990045 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 581.48 403834 2990047 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,459.62 403835 2990048 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 266.32 404046 2990950 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 266.32 403832 2990951 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4.84 404047 2993963 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .29 404051 2993964 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 184.02 404273 2993965 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 534.47 404272 2993971 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 996.04 404271 2993972 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 903.97 404270 2993973 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,980.40 404050 2993976 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,054.06 404049 2993977 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,735.14 404048 2993978 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12,487.68 405318 6/23/2016 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC. 435.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003426 403989 116116248 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 435.00 405319 6/23/2016 130174 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY 1,440.00 FIELD PAINT 00001113 403936 INV597981 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,440.00 405320 6/23/2016 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 1,020.86 SAND 403937 1279 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,020.86 405321 6/23/2016 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.89 PEST CONTROL 403938 5373089 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.89 403939 5440068 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.89 403940 5459699 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 134.67 405322 6/23/2016 129581 POLY-TEX INC. 254.88 PARTS FOR GREENHOUSE 403754 0248651-IN 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 254.88 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # 6/17/2016 — Doc No Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405322 6/23/2016 405323 6/23/2016 129581 POLY-TEX INC. 138566 POOL, JULIA Continued... 9.87 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403880 6000 KELLOGG 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 9.87 405324 6/23/2016 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 200.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 404155 061716 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 200.00 405325 6/23/2016 138292 PRECISE IRRIGATION 201.21 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00002360 404156 1168 5765.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE EXPENSES 253.32 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00002360 404157 1169 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,198.15 MAIN LINE REPAIR 00002360 404158 1170 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,652.68 405326 6/23/2016 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 950.00 GPS SERVICE 404159 IN200-1008755 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 950.00 405327 6/23/2016 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 125.91 NITRILE GLOVES 00005336 403755 58961 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.00 NITRILE GLOVES 403756 59004 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 242.91 405328 6/23/2016 129593 PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 125.00 INVESTIGATION TECHNIQUES 403941 B. KUSKE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 125.00 405329 6/23/2016 138559 QUINN, DON 10.09 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403873 5121 VALLEY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VIEW 10.09 405330 6/23/2016 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 198.40 TIRES 00006057 403942 CD2022843 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 1,768.75 REELS 00006057 403943 CD2023097 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,967.15 405331 6/23/2016 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 572.00 OFFICIATING FEES 404294 061716 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 — Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405331 6/23/2016 124537 RALPH, ROBERT Continued... 572.00 405332 6/23/2016 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 367.00 BASKET STANDS 404164 76033 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 367.00 405333 6/23/2016 138568 RAVELL, MARION 1,603.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 403882 36814714 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,603.00 405334 6/23/2016 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 734.95 POOL TOYS FOR RESALE 00002175 404165 301206 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 734.95 405335 6123/2016 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 150.00 DASHERBOARD AD SALES 404229 516151-8 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 150.00 405336 6/23/2016 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 36.71 WIRING ADAPTER, EXTENSION 403991 1927763099 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.67 BRAKE KIT 00005410 403992 1927763100 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.38 405337 6/23/2016 138594 RISDALL MARKETING GROUP LLC 6,000.00 TAGLINE PROJECT 404286 INV-5671 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 6,000.00 405338 6/23/2016 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 199.68 SOFTENER SALT 00001056 403757 00334006 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 221.76 SOFTENER SALT 00001057 403758 00334007 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 421.44 405339 6/23/2016 100981 ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORP. 133.43 SANITIZER 404166 1267052 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 133.43 405340 6/23/2016 • 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 291.18 CLEAN PARTS WASHER 403759 70265203 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 291.18 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 — 6/23/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405341 6/23/2016 132287 SALMEN, ANNE Continued... 130.00 TENNIS LESSONS 403944 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 130.00 405342 6/23/2016 133463 SANFORD, MARLENE S. 1,603.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 403885 36867350 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,603.00 405343 6/23/2016 138576 SAYLER HTG AND AC 298.30 PERMIT REFUND (5612 DALE AVE) 403993 ED148159 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 298.30 405344 6/23/2016 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 315.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 403760 061416 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 315.00 405345 6/23/2016 100995 SEH 3,936.81 BRAEMAR WETLANDS 403761 316166 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 3,936.81 405346 6/23/2016 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 837.00 JUNE 2016 ADMIN FEES 404167 008816-6/16 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 837.00 405347 6/23/2016 101106 SERVICEMASTER 400.00 TRASHROOM FLOOR CLEANING 403762 55107 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 400.00 405348 6/23/2016 103249 SHANNON, JIM 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/05/16 404071 061516 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405349 6/23/2016 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 52.70 404170 13077212 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 52.70 405350 6/23/2016 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 569.69 FIRE ALARM MONITORING 403994 78646174 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 244.00 ALARM REPAIRS 403945 82579488 7411.6250 ALARM SERVICE PSTF OCCUPANCY 813.69 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405351 6/23/2016 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. Continued... 70.48 HOT DOG BUNS 404230 287177 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 70.48 405352 6/23/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 112.44 WEED KILLER 00001109 403763 76080365 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 189.69 WEED KILLER 00001118 403764 76130864 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 144.86 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001139 403765 76204007 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 446.99 405353 6/23/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 272.83 WRENCH SET, SOCKETS 00005405 403767 ARV/29203895 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 367.42 SOCKET SETS 00005406 403766 ARV/29203896 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 151.72 SOCKET SET 00005406 403768 ARV/29212143 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 791.97 405354 6/23/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 80.00- 403838 0024777 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.00 404279 1403814 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,244.40 403837 1416262 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 96.80 403839 1416264 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 256.09 404052 1419116 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 587.60 404054 1419117 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,152.52 404053 1419118 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 980.03 404278 1419120 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,359.50 404277 1419121 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,772.00 404274 1419122 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,610.64 404276 1419123 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 375.40 404275 1419124 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 85.36 404057 1419125 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 937.57 404059 1419126 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,980.69 404055 1419127 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 135.80 404058 1419128 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,054.40 404056 1419129 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 23,549.80 405355 6/23/2016 131956 SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES 624.00 COMPOST 403769 19504 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 624.00 405356 6/23/2016 134700 SPOK INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 — Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405356 6/23/2016 134700 SPOK INC. Continued... 214.36 PAGERS 403770 Z0319246F 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 214.36 405357 6/23/2016 138563 SPRINGER, DEREK 5.49 UTILITY REFUND-FINAL 403877 3121 56TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 5.49 405358 6/23/2016 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 314.77 BAGS FOR PRO SHOP 404171 0000779311 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 314.77 405359 6/23/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 126.00 404060 11210 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 126.00 405360 6/23/2016 124631 STUART C. IRBY CO. 361.43 RAIN GEAR 00001072 403947 S009613263.002 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 361.43 405361 6/23/2016 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 2,530.00 TIRES 00005407 403771 10139681 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.75 TIRE DISPOSAL CHARGE 00005411 403995 10139682 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 228.10 TIRES 00005435 403772 10139756 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,804.85 405362 6/23/2016 135803 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 134.80 JUNE 2016 COBRA 404175 6/16COBRA 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 6,454.85 JUNE 2016 PREMIUMS 404174 JUNE2016 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE -99 PAYROLL CLEARING 6,589.65 405363 6/23/2016 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 500.00 MOVIE RENTAL 404176 DB2193029 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 500.00 405364 6/23/2016 138562 SWANSON, MARK 100.06 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403876 5508 66TH ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 100.06 405365 6/23/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 1,444.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 404177 606101696 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 — 6/23/2016 6/21/2016 14:1t18 Page - 35 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405365 6/23/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA Continued... 70.44 CONCESSION PRODUCT 404178 606112428 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 532.42 CONCESSION PRODUCT 404179 606141059 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,047.01 405366 6/23/2016 106673 TAPCO 6,177.00 BEACON FOR PED CROSSING 00002573 403773 1528018 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 6,177.00 405367 6/23/2016 104932 TAYLOR MADE 130.67 USAG T-SHIRTS 404180 31747303 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 69.95 404181 31757843 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 200.62 405368 6/23/2016 138583 THEMED CONCEPTS LLC 3,450.00 SHIP PLATFORM REPAIRS 404182 16-150 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 3,450.00 405369 6/23/2016 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 169,821.10 FINAL PAYMENT NO. 9 404299 FRANCE AVE TE 01404.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR 169,821.10 405370 6/23/2016 138591 THOMPSON, AARON 4.38 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 404231 061016 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 60.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 404231 061016 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 64.38 405371 6/23/2016 102798 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 820.11 MAY 2016 CHARGES 403774 834120510 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 820.11 405372 6/23/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,572.45 403840 1093458 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,091.10 404062 1096786 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 40.90 404061 1099421 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,704.45 405373 6/23/2016 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 437.50 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 5/17/16 404232 M22151 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 437.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 36 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405374 6/23/2016 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC Continued-. 210.00 404063 4357 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 210.00 405375 6/23/2016 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 63.87 WIRE FOR WELDING 00005270 403996 10138603 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 77.25 WELDING GAS 403776 40047035 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.11 WELDING CYLINDERS 404184 40047036 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 174.23 405376 6/23/2016 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 1,743.76 REPLACE BELTS & EXHAUST FANS 404233 17435 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,743.76 405377 6/23/2016 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 5.71 BACKGROUND CHECKS 403777 05615348 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5.71 405378 6/23/2016 138581 TRUST IN US LLC 180.00 RANDOM DOT TESTS 404185 66289 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 180.00 405379 6/23/2016 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 491.75 REPAIR DOOR CLOSER 403778 796554 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 491.75 405380 6/23/2016 103875 UCARE 438.95 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 403884 36799897 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 438.95 405381 6/23/2016 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 2,102.94 UNIFORMS 403997 053116 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,102.94 405382 6/23/2016 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 47.23 SHIPPING CHARGE 403779 TRAN: 0592 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 65.19 00001037 403950 TRAN: 0608 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 14.67 SHIPPING CHARGES 00001160 403949 TRAN: 0693 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 43.12 403951 TRAN: 2443 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 170.21 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 — 6/23/2016 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Page - 37 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405383 6/23/2016 100050 USPS Continued... 1,000.00 TMS# 202739 403998 061616 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,000.00 405384 6/23/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 538.78 CAN LINERS 00001064 403952 388232-01 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 538.78 405385 6/23/2016 138558 VANMETRE, DOUGLAS 103.72 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403953 5224 FORSLIN DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 103.72 405386 6/23/2016 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 21.26 RIVETS 00006047 403954 527160003 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 1,218.15 CHARGERS 00006056 403955 602160008 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 1,239.41 405387 6/23/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 44.31 THERMOSTAT 00001090 403999 1463711 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 31.15 PVC CEMENT, ELBOWS 00001124 404186 1493346 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.65 PVC ELBOWS 00001124 404187 1493350 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.11 405388 6/23/2016 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,875.00 3RD QTR SERVICES 403780 216014 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 2,875.00 405389 6/23/2016 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 149.20 BRATS 404235 94952 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 147.70 BRATS 404234 94958 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 296.90 405390 6/23/2016 138564 WAHOSKE, MARISSA 12.81 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 403878 5800 DREWAVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 12.81 405391 6/23/2016 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 42.40 DUMPSTER SERVICE 403781 7381200 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 42.40 405392 6/23/2016 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 38 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 4 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/17/2016 - Inv No 6/23/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405392 6/23/2016 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. Continued... 464.72 GAS 404000 228412 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 1,273.71 FUEL 404001 228413 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,738.43 405393 6/23/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 121.16- 403847 708201 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 478.48 403845 7085023 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19.16 403846 7085024 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 800.31 404282 7086043 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 62.73 404281 7086044 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,954.45 404067 7086045 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,193.97 405394 6/23/2016 130471 WIN FIELD SOLUTIONS LLC 271.75 DROPLEX 403956 60876848 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 206.27 GRAVITY 403957 60884541 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 478.02 405395 6/23/2016 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 11,913.00 TRAFFIC STUDY 403958 1-01686-660 9234.6133 PROFESS SERVICES-ENGINEERING GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 369.00 TRAFFIC STUDY 403959 2-01686-660 9234.6133 PROFESS SERVICES-ENGINEERING GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 12,282.00 405396 6/23/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY 55.42 51-8997917-7 403794 503846974 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 701.61 51-4197645-8 403791 504175008 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 526.62 51-5619094-8 403793 504193696 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,810.00 51-5888961-7 403792 504196734 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 29,132.20 51-5605640-1 403960 504753541 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 1,826.46 51-6227619-3 404190 504767775 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 8,349.52 51-0837548-4 404236 505211454 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 43,401.83 405397 6/23/2016 132109 YOUNG, SEAN 115.00 K9 TRIALS REGISTRATION 404188 REGION 12 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 115.00 405398 6/23/2016 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 808.50 404283 16958 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 808.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:18 Council Check Register by GL Page - 39 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/17/2016 -- 6/23/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405398 6/23/2016 120099 Z WINES USA LLC Continued... 405399 6/23/2016 105727 ZEBEC OF NORTH AMERICA INC. 220.30 TUBES 220.30 405400 6/23/2016 138565 ZIMMERMAN GROUP LLC, THE 40.41 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 40.41 404189 29656 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 403879 6312 ASHCROFT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LANE 2,381,371.69 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 2,226,942.09 A/P ACH Payment 154,429.60 Total Payments 2,381,371.69 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 6/21/2016 14:11:34 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/17/2016 - 6/23/2016 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 136,977.25 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,331.26 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 9,080.20 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 918,138.09 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 9,595.00 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,022.58 05100 ART CENTER FUND 137.91 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 91.83 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 27,457.53 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 44,224.63 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 10,154.70 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 826.73 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 5,737.67 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 9,147.94 05800 LIQUOR FUND 185,695.55 05900 UTILITY FUND 713,802.25 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 284,410.96 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 134.80 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,545.46 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 12,873.25 09238 SOUTH DALE 2 DISTRICT 531.25 09900 PAYROLL FUND 6,454.85 Report Totals 2,381,371.69 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date /2 1/ co /*rim& Directpi ---,41•11n / : CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2016/03/28 $182.35 Wireless Service SPRINT *WIRELESS 800-639-6111 KS 1120.6188 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2016/03/31 $515.00 Registration ACT*GTS MCMA CON FERENC 877-551-5560 TX 1120.6104 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2016/03/31 $8.00 Parking MN ST IAP ADM PMD PARK SAINT PAUL MN 1120.6104 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2016/03/31 $25.31 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2016/04/14 $95.08 Wireless Service SPRINT *WIRELESS 800-639-6111 KS 1120.6188 **0168 SCOTT NEAL 2016/04/18 $33.09 Food EDINA GRILL EDINA MN 1120.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/03/27 $63.00 Volunteer Software VOLGISTICS INC 616-456-5388 MI 1120.6105 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/03/30 $34.92 Paper AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1120.6906 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/04/03 $10.00 Calendar YOUCANBOOKME 441234245538 1120.6105 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/04/06 $400.00 Gift Cards TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1556.6218 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/04/05 $192.88 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/04/11 $515.00 Registration ACT*GTS MCMA CONFERENC 877-551-5560 TX 1120.6104 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/04/11 $228.06 Lodging GRANDVIEW LODGE AND TENNI NISSWA MN 1120.6104 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/04/19 $180.11 Food PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1100.6106 **2129 HEATHER BRANIGIN 2016/04/22 $31.51 Fellow Farewell TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1120.6406 **0437 KAY M CALON EY 2016/04/16 $695.00 Law Conference MINNESOTA CLE 651-227-8266 MN 1170.6104 **0437 KAY MCALONEY 2016/04/16 $64.46 Books-Training AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1170.6406 "9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/02 $14.09 Food-Conference CAFE ROMA - PHOENIX PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/01 $26.06 Food-Conference THE ARROGANT BUTCHER PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/03 $17.00 Food-Conference ARAMARK PHOENIX CONV CTR PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/03 $11.00 Food-Conference ARAMARK PHOENIX CONV CTR PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/04 $27.89 Food-Conference DISTRICT AMERICAN KITCHEN PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/04 $8.88 Food-Conference ARAMARK PHOENIX CONV CTR PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/04 $4.82 Food-Conference ARAMARK PHOENIX CONV CTR PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/04 $18.12 Food-Conference SAM'S CAFE-AZ CENTER PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/05 $20.05 Food-Conference COPPER PLATE PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/05 $4.00 Travel-Conference NM 3RD ST JEFFERSON PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/05 $15.97 Food-Conference SNOOZE AN AM EATERY TEMPE AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/06 $1,152.72 Lodging-Conference SHERATON GRAND PHOENIX PHOENIX AZ 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/15 $65.00 Conference & Events MN ASSOCIATION OF REAL 952-928-4669 MN 1140.6104 **9159 CARY TEAGUE 2016/04/19 $50.00 Conference & Events SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITI 612-7207667 MN 1140.6104 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2016/04/04 $19.95 Transaction fee PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 1160.6155 **7370 ERIC ROGGEMAN 2016/04/04 $25.95 Transaction fee-UB PAYFLOW/PAYPAL 888-883-9770 TX 5902.6155 **4496 KYLE SAWYER 2016/03/25 $15.99 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1160.6106 **4496 KYLE SAWYER 2016/04/01 $29.99 Membership IDENTITY GUARD 800-214-4791 VA 1160.6105 **4496 KYLE SAWYER 2016/04/06 $12.14 Food JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1160.6106 **4496 KYLE SAWYER 2016/04/06 $16.04 Food STARBUCKS JERRY'S EDINA EDINA MN 1160.6106 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **0143 DEB MANGEN 2016/03/31 $550.00 Conference INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE 0 909-9444162 CA 1180.6104 **0143 DEB MANGEN 2016/04/05 $539.50 Office Supplies SPECTRA ASSOCIATES 518-439-9534 NY 1100.6406 **0143 DEB MANGEN 2016/04/12 $5.00 Parking GOVERNMENT CENTER PARKING MINNEAPOLIS MN 1180.6109 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2016/03/29 $178.00 Residential Summit LBP*REALESTATECOMMGRP 312-416-1860 IL 1190.6104 "0184 ROBERT WILSON 2016/03/28 $199.00 Trends Seminar APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888-7564624 IL 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2016/03/29 $199.00 Trends Seminar APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 888-7564624 IL 1190.6104 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2016/03/31 $9.00 Parking-Tax Court Settlement GOVERNMENT CENTER PARKING MINNEAPOLIS MN 1190.6106 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2016/03/31 $16.85 Parking-Tax Court Settlement EUREST THRIVEN11133782 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1190.6106 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2016/04/11 $144.91 Board Orientation Mtg DAM ICO & SONS-EDI EDINA MN 1190.6106 **0184 ROBERT WILSON 2016/04/21 $3.73 Meeting Expense JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1190.6106 **2522 BRIAN OLSON 2016/04/11 $235.00 MN APWA Conference U OF M CONTLEARNING 844-228-0558 MN 1280.6104 "2522 BRIAN OLSON 2016/04/13 $122.00 Certificate Renewal BOARD OF AELSLAGID 651-2962388 MN 1280.6105 "2522 BRIAN OLSON 2016/04/14 $390.24 MN APWA Conference GRANDVIEW LODGE AND TENNI NISSWA MN 1280.6104 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2016/04/12 $9.38 Strachauer Park CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 01421.1705.2 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2016/04/13 $235.00 MN APWA Conference U OF M CONTLEARNING 844-228-0558 MN 1260.6104 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2016/04/13 $364.00 MnSPE & Local Membership MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF PROF 651-4572347 MN 1260.6104 "9180 MILLNER CHAD 2016/04/14 $859.75 Program EXCAL VISUAL INC 303-817-6881 CO 5960.6103 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2016/04/15 $65.00 Conference MN ASSOCIATION OF REAL 952-928-4669 MN 1260.6104 **9180 MILLNER CHAD 2016/04/14 $390.24 Conference-Lodging GRANDVIEW LODGE AND TENNI NISSWA MN 1260.6104 "4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2016/04/06 $21.40 Maple Dowels WOODCRAFT 306 612-6702899 MN 1301.6906 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2016/04/08 $1,000.00 Training LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER 320-3847093 MN 1281.6104 **4882 ANDERSON SHAWN 2016/04/20 $10.92 Wood and Putty ROCKLER WOODWORK 014 MINNETONKA MN 1301.6406 **7756 GARY WELLS 2016/04/01 $201.33 Grease Chopper USA BLUE BOOK 800-548-1234 IL 5920.6556 "7756 GARY WELLS 2016/04/02 $42.84 Otterbox Case WIRELESSWORLD VERIZON 266 COTTAGE GROVE MN 5913.6406 "7756 GARY WELLS 2016/04/04 $410.06 Adapters POLLARDWATER.COM #3326 NEW HYDE PARK NY 5913.6406 "7756 GARY WELLS 2016/04/05 ($58.36) Bird Screen End Cap SHEET METAL CONNECTORS FRIDLEY MN 5915.6136 "6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2016/04/06 ($255.00) Training AWWA.ORG 303-347-6197 CO 5919.6104 **6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2016/04/06 ($255.00) Training AWWA.ORG 303-347-6197 CO 5919.6104 "6368 DAVE GOERGEN 2016/04/06 ($255.00) Training AWWA.ORG 303-347-6197 CO 5919.6104 **7262 NOAH SILVER 2016/03/25 $160.64 LED Flood Lights-City Hall E-CONOLIGHT 888-243-9445 WI 1551.6406 "7262 NOAH SILVER 2016/03/28 $195.79 Condensate Pan w/Heat-Liq #3 BIRMINHAM MANUFACTURING I 319-498-4360 IA 5861.6530 "7262 NOAH SILVER 2016/04/14 $10.00 Parking-Electrical Expo PLZA MPLSPARKING MINNEAPOLIS MN 1281.6104 **7262 NOAH SILVER 2016/04/22 $48.00 License Renewal-Rischmiller DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND I 651-4313355 MN 1280.6105 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/03/29 $41.47 In-Service Training CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/03/30 $150.00 Registration EB TWIN CITIES ORGAN! 801-413-7200 CA 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/03/31 $332.84 Lodging GRANDVIEW LODGE AND TENNI NISSWA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/04 ($99.00) Membership-Reversal AMAZONPRIME MEMBERSHIP AMZN.COM/PRME WA 1400.6104 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/05 $120.48 In-Service Training FIREHOUSE SUBS #93 RICHFIELD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/05 $19.20 In-Service Training JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/06 $150.60 In-Service Training FIREHOUSE SUBS #93 RICHFIELD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/06 $23.12 In-Service Training JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/12 $200.02 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/12 $200.02 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/12 $200.02 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/12 $200.02 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/12 $200.02 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/19 $97.89 In-Service Training FIREHOUSE SUBS #93 RICHFIELD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/19 $34.90 In-Service Training JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/19 $625.00 Basic Police Sniper - Toll SNIPERCRAFT 863-385-7835 FL 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/20 $83.90 In-Service Training FIREHOUSE SUBS #93 RICHFIELD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/21 $97.89 In-Service Training FIREHOUSE SUBS #93 RICHFIELD MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/21 $18.66 In-Service Training JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1400.6104 **5621 MARK A BIERMAIER 2016/04/22 ($83.90) In-Service Training FIREHOUSE SUBS #93 RICHFIELD MN 1400.6104 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2016/03/29 $24.07 Indoor/Outdoor Cover ST CROIX HARLEY-DAVIDSON NEW RICHMOND WI 1400.6406 **0597 RYAN SCHULTZ 2016/04/14 $70.00 Luncheon MADD- OL 800-438-6233 TX 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/03/26 $61.00 Supplies AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/04 $44.98 Office Product OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 1400.6406 "1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/07 ($2,190.00) 2016 Executive Training Institute MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLIC 651-4570677 MN 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/07 $550.00 2016 Executive Training Institute MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLIC 651-4570677 MN 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/07 $550.00 2016 Executive Training Institute MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLIC 651-4570677 MN 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/07 $550.00 2016 Executive Training Institute MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLIC 651-4570677 MN 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/14 $21.99 Plano Tackle Box AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1400.6406 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/20 $327.00 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/20 $327.00 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/20 $327.00 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **1305 DAVID NELSON 2016/04/20 $109.00 Lodging BEST WESTERN HOTELS - ST. ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2016/03/25 $543.69 Lodging-Blue Card Training HILTON SUITES PHX PHOENIX AZ 1470.6104 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2016/03/28 $135.20 Paramedic Meeting JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 1470.4760 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2016/03/22 $12.00 Meal-Blue Card Training HILTON GREAT AM GRILL PHOENIX AZ 1470.6106 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2016/04/05 $92.31 Funeral-Bowler ARTISTIC FLORAL 9529204772 MN 1470.6406 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2016/04/05 $214.54 Camera Flash CAN*CANONUSA DIRECT 800-385-2155 NY 1470.6406 **8481 TOM SCHMITZ 2016/04/09 $114.13 Fire Responders DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1470.6106 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2016/03/26 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1470.6188 **0927 DARRELL TODD 2016/04/05 $221.92 Tool Kit GALLS 859-266-7227 KY 1470.6406 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **1777 CRAIG ESSIG 2016/03/25 $190.92 Lodging-Training HOLIDAY INNS SAINT CLOUD MN 1470.6104 **1777 CRAIG ESSIG 2016/03/25 $551.09 Lodging-Blue Card Training HILTON SUITES PHX PHOENIX AZ 1470.6104 **1777 CRAIG ESSIG 2016/03/22 $24.36 Meal-Blue Card Training HILTON GREAT AM GRILL PHOENIX AZ 14706106 **1777 CRAIG ESSIG 2016/04/12 $86.98 Uniforms LANDS END BUS OUTFITTERS 800-587-1541 WI 1470.6558 **1777 CRAIG ESSIG 2016/04/13 $150.00 Training AFAA 844-438-2322 OH 1470.6104 **1777 CRAIG ESSIG 2016/04/23 $210.00 Uniforms LANDS END BUS OUTFITTERS 800-587-1541 WI 1470.6558 "8102 JEFF BROWN 2016/03/30 $77.00 Inspection Supplies IN *BAILEY'S TEST STRIPS 201-3438004 NJ 1490.6406 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2016/04/08 $60.00 Registration MEHA Spring PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402-935-7733 CA 1490.6104 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2016/04/08 $60.00 Registration MEHA Spring PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402-935-7733 CA 1490.6104 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2016/04/12 $60.00 Registration MEHA Spring PAYPAL *MINNESOTAEN 402-935-7733 CA 1490.6104 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2016/04/11 $123.09 Lodging MEHA Spring CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOLF RE BRAINERD MN 1490.6104 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2016/04/11 $123.09 Lodging MEHA Spring CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOLF RE BRAINERD MN 1490.6104 **8102 JEFF BROWN 2016/04/12 $246.18 Lodging MEHA Spring CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOLF RE BRAINERD MN 1490.6104 **8686 DAVID FISHER 2016/03/31 $75.00 Registration AFAA 844-438-2322 OH 1495.6104 "8686 DAVID FISHER 2016/04/05 $80.00 License Fees DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND I 651-4313355 MN 1495.6103 **8686 DAVID FISHER 2016/04/20 $320.00 Registration-Erosion & Stornnwate U OF M - BBE EROSION 612-625-1905 MN 5960.6103 **4619 TIM BARNES 2016/03/25 $104.25 Keys and Lock Core EASYKEYSCOM INC 877-839-5397 NC 1551.6406 **4619 TIM BARNES 2016/04/01 $65.00 Permits CITY OF EDINA BUILDING EDINA MN 1646.6406 "4619 TIM BARNES 2016/04/07 $38.07 CRBPS Asset Management-Meal JIMMY JOHNS - 1743 708-704-5452 MN 450007.6710 **4619 TIM BARNES 2016/04/12 $498.75 Public Works City Clean-up DICK'S SANITATION 952-469-2239 MN 1552.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/03/25 $299.00 Toolbox 12 SOI*SBS ROCHESTER HILL 800-639-6774 MI 1553.6585 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/03/28 $129.00 Toolbox 12 Upgrade SOI*SBS ROCHESTER HILL 800-639-6774 MI 1553.6585 "1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/03/30 $119.99 Sony BEST BUY MHT 00002816 RICHFIELD MN 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/04/06 $110.00 Registration and Test Fee ASE TEST FEES 703-669-6600 VA 1281.6104 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/04/06 $326.78 Exhaust Manifold PAYPAL *ROCKAUTOLLC 402-935-7733 WI 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/04/06 $17.91 Shipping UPS*1Z19T48V0393309176 800-811-1648 GA 1553.6406 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/04/05 $59.49 Clear Coat/Fill Clean ZITCO INC 952-3926083 MN 1553.6530 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/04/15 $45.00 Pull Knob & Pin/Serrated Jaws YOST VISES LLC 616-3962063 MI 1553.6585 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/04/20 $602.00 Training-Ford Engine Performance IN *AUTOMOTIVE TRAINING G 858-4868525 CA 1281.6104 **1996 GUNNAR KAASA 2016/04/22 $50.60 Cases DISCOUNTCELL INC 801-235-9809 UT 1553.6406 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2016/04/04 $0.54 License Tabs MN DVS STLSPK 001 695 FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1553.6260 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2016/04/04 $22.00 License Tabs MN DVS ST LS PK 001 695 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1553.6260 "9798 SUSAN WAACK 2016/04/05 $11.83 Computer Speakers TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1552.6406 **9798 SUSAN WAACK 2016/04/11 $1.02 License Tabs MN DVS STLSPK 001 695 FEE KNOXVILLE TN 1553.6260 "9798 SUSAN WAACK 2016/04/11 $41.50 License Tabs MN DVS ST LS PK 001 695 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1553.6260 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/03/25 $29.70 Royal TS V3 & Royal TSX V2 Bund1( DRI*ROYAL TS/X BUNDLE ELEMENT5.INFO MN 1554.6160 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/03/26 $49.99 Keyboard for Katy L AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6710 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/03/26 $69.96 Touchpad for Dispatch AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 2310.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/03/26 $71.75 Display Port Adapters AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/03/31 $218.75 PDF Forms Script PAYPAL *TRY6767 402-935-7733 CA 1495.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/03/31 $31.25 PDF Forms Script PAYPAL *TRY6767 402-935-7733 CA 1554.6160 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/04 $41.99 Keyboard & Mouse for Nick AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/04 $375.00 Premium Annual Fee LYNDA.COM, INC. 888-3359632 CA 1554.6104 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/05 $1.00 Test CITY OF EDINA RECEPTION IS EDINA MN 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/08 $37.26 Keyboard for Dispatch AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 2310.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/08 $480.00 3CMA Savvy Award Entry/Hotel PAYPAL *3CMA 402-935-7733 DC 1130.6105 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/08 $595.00 3CMA Savvy Award Entry/Hotel PAYPAL *3CMA 402-935-7733 DC 1130.6104 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/05 ($1.00) Test CITY OF EDINA RECEPTIONIS EDINA MN 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/19 $268.50 Key Lockboxes AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/22 $21.38 Batteries & 3" Gear Tie Display BATTERIES PLUS #18 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1554.6406 **2481 RYAN BROWNING 2016/04/22 $85.81 Logitech Mouse BEST BUY MHT 00003293 MAPLE GROVE MN 1554.6406 **5587 DAWN BEITEL 2016/03/25 $22.37 Gogurt and Oranges TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5730.5510 "5587 DAWN BEITEL 2016/04/06 $654.18 Socks VISR WWW.VISR.NET NC 5720.5510 "5587 DAWN BEITEL 2016/04/20 $17.56 Gogurt TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5730.5510 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2016/03/30 $466.93 Grand Opening Scissors IN *SPECIALTY DESIGN & MF 715-4439967 WI 1600.6406 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2016/04/19 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1600.6188 **6841 ANN KATTREH 2016/04/21 $367.49 NRPA Conference NATIONAL RECREATION & 703-858-2179 VA 1600.6104 "7279 DONNA TILSNER 2016/04/06 $28.95 Badge OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 1628.6513 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2016/03/30 $1,092.00 Volleyball Gym Fee BCS*EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCA 952-848-3952 MN 1621.6406 **7130 ERIC BOETTCHER 2016/04/07 $18.19 Lock for Storage Lockers THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1626.6406 **1346 BOB PRESTRUD 2016/04/02 $62.88 Self-Laminating Tags ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES 800-295-5510 IL 1646.6406 **1346 BOB PRESTRUD 2016/04/04 $53.63 Phone Chargers VERIZON WRLS M3095-01 BLOOMINGTON MN 1640.6406 **1346 BOB PRESTRUD 2016/04/11 $10.25 Pesticide License-Luther DEPT OF AGRICULTURE 651-2972015 MN 1640.6104 **1346 BOB PRESTRUD 2016/04/15 $437.68 Garbage Pickers HOMEDEPOT.COM 800-430-3376 GA 1645.6406 **1346 BOB PRESTRUD 2016/04/15 $10.88 Phone Case AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1640.6406 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/03/27 $399.00 Archiving Platform ARCHIVESOCIAL.COM 888-558-6032 NC 1130.6124 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/03/25 $20.00 Data Plan-Jennifer VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/03/30 $10.00 Microphone Part AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 1130.6410 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/03/31 $138.00 Microphones - Council Chambers AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 421130.6710 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/02 $25.00 EEC Event FB Ad FACEBOOK 47TVT8S532 650-6187714 CA 1122.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/02 $14.44 On The Job-Edina TV FB Ad FACEBOOK 471VT8S532 650-6187714 CA 1130.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/02 $10.59 EEC Event Instagrann Ad FACEBOOK 57TVT8S532 650-6187714 CA 1122.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/03 $10.72 Photoshop Lightroonn Bundle ADOBE *PHOTOGPHY PLAN 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/05 $20.00 Data Plan-Kaylin VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/05 $15.16 Subscription THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCULAT 612-6734343 MN 1130.6105 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/05 $35.56 On The Job-Edina TV FB Ad FACEBOOK FCTRT8N532 650-6187714 CA 1130.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/05 $14.41 EEC Event Instagram Ad FACEBOOK GCTRT8N532 650-6187714 CA 1122.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/05 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Scott ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/06 $20.00 Data Plan-Jordan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/06 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Scott ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/10 $160.65 Subscription MAILCHIMP MAILCHIMP.COM GA 1130.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/08 $25.00 EEC Event Promo Instagram FACEBOOK ZNETW8J532 650-6187714 CA 1122.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/08 $25.00 EEC Event Promo FB FACEBOOK XNETW8J532 650-6187714 CA 1122.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/11 $20.00 Data Plan-Scott VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 1130.6160 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/12 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Kaylin ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/13 $50.40 EEC Event Promo FB FACEBOOK MKEBU8S532 650-6187714 CA 1122.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/13 $44.99 EEC Event Promo FB FACEBOOK RVQGR86632 650-6187714 CA 1122.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/13 $5.20 Aquatic Center FB Ad FACEBOOK RVQGR86632 650-6187714 CA 5310.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/13 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Jordan ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/14 $27.74 Aquatic Center FB Ad FACEBOOK WZQGR86632 650-6187714 CA 5310.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/14 $4.61 EEC Event Promo FB FACEBOOK WZQGR86632 650-6187714 CA 1122.6103 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/14 $17.55 Art Center FB Ad FACEBOOK WZQGR86632 650-6187714 CA 5110.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/16 $53.63 Creative Cloud-Jennifer ADOBE *CREATIVE CLOUD 800-833-6687 CA 1130.6406 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/15 $25.30 Aquatic Center FB Ad FACEBOOK 0349Q82632 650-6187714 CA 5310.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/15 $17.11 Art Center FB Ad FACEBOOK 0349082632 650-6187714 CA 5110.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/16 $13.52 Aquatic Center FB Ad FACEBOOK Z6T4Y8A532 650-6187714 CA 5310.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/16 $9.60 Art Center FB Ad FACEBOOK Z6T4Y8A532 650-6187714 CA 5110.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/16 $26.91 Edina Liquor FB Ad FACEBOOK Z6T4Y8A532 650-6187714 CA 5842.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/17 $29.95 Online Invoicing FRESHBOOKS 866-3036061 DE 1130.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/18 $3.24 Aquatic Center FB Ad FACEBOOK R2RVW8J532 650-6187714 CA 5310.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/18 $5.74 Art Center FB Ad FACEBOOK R2RVW8J532 650-6187714 CA 5110.6122 **2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/18 $23.09 Edina Liquor FB Ad FACEBOOK R2RVW8J532 650-6187714 CA 5842.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/21 $50.00 Toggl Project Management TOGGL TALLINN 1130.6103 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/22 $5.83 Aquatic Center FB Ad FACEBOOK NUZET8W532 650-6187714 CA 5310.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/22 $44.27 Art Center FB Ad FACEBOOK NUZET8W532 650-6187714 CA 5110.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/23 $45.12 Aquatic Center FB Ad FACEBOOK 2C76Y8A532 650-6187714 CA 5310.6122 "2293 JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 2016/04/23 $5.73 Art Center FB Ad FACEBOOK 2C76Y8A532 650-6187714 CA 5110.6122 **5821 AMY SMITH 2016/03/25 $5.37 Supplies TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1627.6406 **5821 AMY SMITH 2016/03/26 $732.30 Food THE TIN FISH EDINA MN 1627.6406 **5821 AMY SMITH 2016/04/14 $10.27 Grocery for Resale CUB FOODS #6690 BLOOMINGTON MN 5420.5510 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2016/03/28 $20.00 Data Plan VZWRLSS*PRPAY AUTOPAY 888-294-6804 CA 5440.6406 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2016/03/30 $96.27 Office Supplies OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5410.6513 **8806 MARY WOOLDRIDGE 2016/04/14 $216.35 Plantings BACHMAN'S INC. MINNEAPOLIS MN 5422.6275 "2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/03/28 $72.67 Paint HIRSHFIELDS/HOPKINS-LATH HOPKINS MN 5422.6406 "2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/03/28 $7.57 Grate & Drain Pipe MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE MN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5422.6406 "2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/03/30 $52.28 Brush and Rust Enamel JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5422.6406 "2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/04/01 $21.75 Cores BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLU MINNEAPOLIS MN 5424.6406 "2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/04/05 $161.06 Machine Covers TARPS INC SAVAGE MN 5424.6406 **2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/04/05 $25.60 Paint MENARDS BURNSVILLE MN BURNSVILLE MN 5422.6406 **2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/04/11 $36.42 Paint HIRSHFIELDS/HOPKINS-LATH HOPKINS MN 5422.6406 **2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/04/19 $12.33 Hasp JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5422.6406 "2892 TOM SWENSON 2016/04/19 $51.52 Sawblade THE HOME DEPOT #2845 RICHFIELD MN 5424.6530 **7946 JOSEPH ABOOD 2016/04/15 $83.48 Range Trash Cans THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5424.6103 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/03/26 $27.81 Equipment AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5552.6406 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/03/27 $26.94 Equipment AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5552.6406 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/03/28 $22.98 Equipment AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5552.6406 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/03/30 $33.38 Equipment AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5552.6406 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/04/06 $117.16 Drinking Fountain Filter AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5553.6406 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/04/08 $84.83 Supplies US FOODS CULINARY E AND S 651-6388993 MN 5520.6406 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/04/17 $47.50 Staff Training DOMINO'S 1927 320-235-8277 MN 5511.6104 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/04/18 $8.41 Braided Nylon/Poly Cord THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5553.6406 "4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/04/20 $117.41 Black Grid Tower w/Casters STORE SUPPLY 800-823-8887 MO 5511.6406 **4673 SUSIE MILLER 2016/04/23 $495.00 Basic Refrigeration Class SERVING THE AMERICAN R 719-5381149 CO 5510.6104 "7354 JASON COTTEN 2016/03/29 $51.65 Sealant and Adhesive JERRY'S HARDWARE 5 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6406 "7354 JASON COTTEN 2016/04/05 $389.00 Repairs BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBIN MINNEAPOLIS MN 5511.6180 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2016/04/05 $10.98 Fasteners JERRY'S HARDWARE 5 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 5511.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2016/04/08 ($54.00) Repairs BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBIN MINNEAPOLIS MN 5511.6180 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2016/04/08 $25.95 Skate Repair GEORGE'S SHOE & SKATE ST PAUL MN 5511.6406 "7354 JASON COTTEN 2016/04/08 $19.34 Other JET.COM 855-538-4323 NJ 5511.6406 **7354 JASON COTTEN 2016/04/15 $48.24 Flex Seal JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 5511.6406 "7354 JASON COTTEN 2016/04/22 $43.88 Tape, Chin Strap, Mouthguards GENERAL SPORTS - B MINNEAPOLIS MN 5511.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2016/03/31 $99.00 Membership-Disputed AMAZONPRIME MEMBERSHIP AMZN.COM/PRME WA 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2016/04/20 $300.00 Playgrounds Special Visit BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA MINNEAPOLIS MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2016/04/20 $150.00 TT Field Trip AIRMAXX TRAMPOLINE PAR EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1624.6406 **7010 AMANDA HOLLE 2016/04/21 $112.50 TT Field Trip SQ *BUBBLE SMASH SPORTS WOOD BURY MN 1624.6406 "9328 MICHAEL FREY 2016/03/28 $13.47 General Supplies-Gallery THE BEAD MONKEY MINNEAPOLIS MN 5120.6406 "9328 MICHAEL FREY 2016/03/28 $415.85 General Supplies-Gallery THE BEAD MONKEY MINNEAPOLIS MN 5120.6406 "9328 MICHAEL FREY 2016/04/22 $77.13 General Supplies EDINA ART CENTER EDINA MN 5110.6406 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **5720 ROGER LEMIRE 2016/03/28 $42.98 Colored Duct Tape AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5720.6406 **5720 ROGER LEMIRE 2016/03/30 $107.00 ADA Stair Repair VIRTUAL POLYMER COMPOUNDS 888-290-9522 NY 5720.6406 **5720 ROGER LEMIRE 2016/04/20 $68.99 Vacuum Bags AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5720.6406 **5802 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2016/03/25 $100.00 Postage POSTAGE REFILL 800-468-8454 CT 5710.6235 **5802 PATRICIA MCGRATH 2016/04/02 $2,096.60 Uniforms THE LIFEGUARD STORE IN 309-451-5858 IL 5311.6201 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/03/30 $82.46 Office Supplies OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5760.6513 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/03/31 $57.04 Office Supplies OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5760.6513 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/05 $51.86 Paint, Sandpaper, Bin MENARDS RICHFIELD MN RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/06 ($114.30) Sales Tax Credit on Rental HIAWATHA REDDY RENTS 612-7229516 MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/06 $1,317.00 Excavator Rental HIAWATHA REDDY RENTS 612-7229516 MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/06 $1,584.30 Trailer w/Equipment Rental HIAWATHA REDDY RENTS 612-7229516 MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/09 $184.40 Plantings BRECKS WHOLESALE 513-354-1482 IN 5761.6620 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/11 $99.98 Jaw Bone PVC/N DICK'S CLOTHING&SPORTING RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/11 $58.17 Batteries and Resin MENARDS RICHFIELD MN RICHFIELD MN 5761.6046 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/13 $33.63 Masonry Supplies MENARDS RICHFIELD MN RICHFIELD MN 5761.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/17 $29.00 Office Supplies WHENIWORK.COM 651-330-4482 MN 5760.6105 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/15 $49.29 Presentation Lectern AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5760.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/15 $64.99 Chalkboard Easel AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5760.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/15 $64.99 Chalkboard Easel AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM/BILL WA 5760.6406 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/19 $248.53 Granular Containers AQUACIDE COMPANY 651-4296126 MN 5765.6540 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/18 $99.94 Office Supplies OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5760.6513 **0116 TOM SHIRLEY 2016/04/23 ($58.00) Plantings BRECKS WHOLESALE 513-354-1482 IN 5761.6620 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/03/30 $45.00 Training Credits MLBA 651-772-0910 MN 5842.6406 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/03/30 $45.00 Training Credits MLBA 651-772-0910 MN 5862.6406 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/04/07 $61.94 Subscription SPMC 435-2009041 UT 5840.6105 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/04/15 $28.50 CardDefender Monthly Service RETAIL INFORMATION TEC 320-761-6423 MN 5822.6406 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/04/15 $28.50 CardDefender Monthly Service RETAIL INFORMATION TEC 320-761-6423 MN 5842.6406 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/04/15 $28.50 CardDefender Monthly Service RETAIL INFORMATION TEC 320-761-6423 MN 5862.6406 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/04/21 $7.25 Office Supplies OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5820.6406 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/04/21 $10.75 Office Supplies OFFICEMAX/OFFICEDEPOT6042 EDINA MN 5840.6406 **9273 STEVEN GRAUSAM 2016/04/22 $21.82 Googon Spray & Mop THE HOME DEPOT 2805 BLOOMINGTON MN 5821.6406 **2223 GREG BRETSON 2016/03/28 $143.38 Agility Course Rebuild THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 "9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/03/25 $65.00 Office Services CTC*CONSTANTCONTACT.COM 855-2295506 MA 7410.6122 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/04/01 $30.00 Email Service EMA*EMMA EMAIL MARKETING 800-5954401 TN 7410.6122 "9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/04/07 $199.00 TRM 12M0 Friend Offer FREDPRYOR CAREERTRACK 800-5563012 KS 7410.6218 "9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/04/07 $199.00 TRM 12M0 Friend Offer FREDPRYOR CAREERTRACK 800-5563012 KS 7410.6218 **9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/04/13 ($96.49) Support Program Refund INTUIT *QUICKBOOKS 800-446-8848 CA 7410.6103 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 03/25/16-04/24/16 Account Name Date Amount Description Vendor City State Account **9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/04/13 $35.34 Training Meal DOMINO'S 1927 320-235-8277 MN 7414.6104 "9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/04/19 $29.39 3M Privacy Filters AMAZON PRIME NOW AMAZON.COM/BI WA 7414.6406 "9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/04/19 $395.99 Targets LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS 800-7790182 MN 7412.6406 "9956 DEB FIELDS 2016/04/21 $5.00 3M Privacy Filters AMAZON PRIME NOW TIPS AMAZON.COM/BI WA 7414.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/03/29 $255.04 Duct Tape/Ballasts THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/04 $48.09 Batteries & Magnet Latch THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/06 $60.92 Rubber Hammer/Wire Brushes THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/13 $46.48 Bakery JERRY'S FOODS OF ED EDINA MN 7414.6218 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/15 $66.09 Batteries/Gloves/Hose Hanger THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/18 $17.15 Hardware Cloth JERRY'S DO IT BEST EDINA MN 7412.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/18 $99.96 Coffee SAMS CLUB #4787 BLOOMINGTON MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/18 $25.31 Cable Ties THE HOME DEPOT 2812 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/20 $68.32 Grocery/Bakery/Meat CUB FOODS EDEN PRAI EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7413.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/21 $17.06 Water/Muffins SAMSCLUB #4787 BLOOMINGTON MN 7411.6406 **0314 GERALD KOPLOS 2016/04/22 $41.77 Bulbs MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE MN EDEN PRAIRIE MN 7411.6406 $40,256.54 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date /2_ /7 c. ( pirecto -....e.Wal'IMPPYAn -Aar y a ag R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3317 6/30/2016 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 416.25 DOOR REPAIRS 405109 21603213 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,008.30 REPAIR RAMP GARAGE DOORS 405110 21606091 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,424.55 3318 6/30/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 32.00 404691 2011476 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 27.20 404692 2011954 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 83.20 404693 2011961 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 95.20 404690 2011966 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 64.80 404955 2015900 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 156.80 404957 2015903 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 12.00 404956 2015908 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 471.20 3319 6/30/2016 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 38.25 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 404760 146703 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 109.35 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 405113 146704 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 147.60 3320 6/30/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 600.82 COFFEE 404766 1230903 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 75.19 COFFEE 405008 8937051 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 676.01 3321 6/30/2016 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 211.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 404861 23270354.00-224 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 826.50 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 404861 23270354.00-224 04418.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Strachauer Park A 1,037.50 3322 6/30/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 147.75 404960 54180000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 42.90 404962 54189200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 250.62 404807 6667300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 296.54 404806 94147600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 52.74 404961 9414770 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 790.55 3323 6/30/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 57.96 ID HOLDERS 404309 0E-422940-1 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 108.37 LAMINATING POUCHES 00001234 404862 WO-208513-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 — 6/30/2016 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Page - 2 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3323 6/30/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued... 166.33 3324 6/30/2016 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 4,552.50 WATER TOWER REHAB 404311 0190978 4616.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SCADA Radio System Upgrade 4,552.50 3325 6/30/2016 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 142.82 COVERS 00005414 404864 1066165X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 952.72 BRAKE DRUMS, SLACK ADJUSTERS00005420 404863 1067453 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.68 BOLTS 00005420 404865 1067528 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,900.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005376 404866 197718 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,005.22 3326 6/30/2016 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,967.75 MATERIALS TESTING 404869 B060929 01430.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 1,967.75 3327 6/30/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 489.80 404967 282034 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 489.80 3328 6/30/2016 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 37,016.51 MAY 2016 LODGING TAX 405123 062716 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 37,016.51 3329 6/30/2016 124541 GEYEN GROUP 293.91 CARPET CLEANING 405031 25834 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 293.91 3330 6/30/2016 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 4,885.00 SEWER REPAIR 00002572 404888 14484 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 4,885.00 3331 6/30/2016 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 75.37 CHEMICAL FEED PARTS 00001043 404656 997188 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 185.76 CHEMICAL FEED PARTS 00001207 404657 999800 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 261.13 3332 6/30/2016 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 59.50 TOILET RENTAL 404658 103214 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3332 6/30/2016 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. Continued... 59.50 3333 6/30/2016 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SERVICES 2,220.00 REPAIRS -5701 FAIRFAX AVE 404894 3091 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 2,220.00 3334 6/30/2016 100858 LOGIS 633.00 404665 41928 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,633.00 404665 41928 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 4,294.00 404665 41928 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 4,594.00 404665 41928 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 4,840.00 404665 41928 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 6,367.00 404665 41928 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 6,639.00 404665 41928 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,175.00 404665 41928 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 35,175.00 3335 6/30/2016 101792 LUBE-TECH 487.80 DEGREASER, SOAP 404895 791316 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 487.80 3336 6/30/2016 101078 LUBE-TECH ESI 145.88 DRYING AGENT 00005358 405130 10928 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 145.88 3337 6/30/2016 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 481.01 404730 219075 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 898.04 404728 219076 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 744.81 404729 219077 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 176.66 404833 219181 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,300.52 3338 6/30/2016 101483 MENARDS 7.36 PAINT 00001900 404669 16179 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 68.39 HARDWARE 00001214 404670 16248 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 75.75 3339 6/30/2016 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 174.75 404671 38401 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 231.70 404671 38401 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3339 6/30/2016 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY Continued... 406.45 3340 6/30/2016 129485 PAPCO INC. 95.56 HAND TOWELS 405047 99727 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 95.56 3341 6/30/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,039.80 TIRES 00005399 404903 210236241 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,039.80 3342 6/30/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 965.52 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 00002368 404904 10157 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 333.70 NAPKINS 404791 10190 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 252.64 POPCORN CUPS 00002370 405052 10192 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,551.86 3343 6/30/2016 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 630.18 COMPRESSOR, DRYER 00005441 404681 7873857 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 86.85 VALVE, FILTER, 0-RINGS 00005445 404911 7879837 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 578.87- RETURN COMPRESSOR 404682 7887206 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.21 CONNECTOR, PINS 00005446 404912 7894497 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 202.37 3344 6/30/2016 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 406.56 BRIDGE 90646 REPAIR 405138 002016001588 1346.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 406.56 3345 6/30/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 2,718.67 S-DECK, SPANNER 00005186 404913 0138950 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 184.13 FLASHER SWITCH 00005404 405061 0139562 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,902.80 3346 6/30/2016 119454 V1NOCOPIA 242.50 404757 0154355-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 124.25 404758 0154356-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 141.00 404756 0154471-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 162.50 405001 0154948-1N 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 113.50 405002 0154949-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE VERNON SELLING 43.00 405000 0154952-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 826.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3346 3347 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued-, 1,421.45 404759 428609-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 982.85 404852 429192-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 1,136.50 404853 429194-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 664.35 404851 429197-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,205.15 405401 6/30/2016 100612 AR. LEONARD 103.21 HOES 00002367 404859 CI16104155 5761.6556 TOOLS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 158.88 SPRAYER, MULCH COLORANT 00002367 404860 C116113481 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 262.09 405402 6/30/2016 135278 AAS, ANN 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 405064 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 405403 6/30/2016 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 64.74 GASKETS, MILL HOSE 00001036 404307 1-874821 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 64.74 405404 6/30/2016 124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST 2,950.08 JANITORIAL SERVICE 405111 9623411 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,950.08 405405 6/30/2016 129458 ACME TOOLS 998.99 LEVEL 405112 4210559 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 998.99 405406 6/30/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 114.17 SHOES 405005 902605519 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 86.41 SHOES 405004 902605534 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 810.23 SHIRTS 405006 902627797 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,187.10 APPAREL 405007 902627824 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,197.91 405407 6/30/2016 138649 AHMANN, MARK 38.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404940 5145 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ABERCROMBIE 38.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405407 405408 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 138649 AHMANN, MARK 135342 ALLEGRA MIDWAY Continued... 70.00 WINDOW PRICING 404761 44815 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 70.00 405409 6/30/2016 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 60.45 ART WORK SOLD 405065 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 60.45 405410 6/30/2016 134182 ANGELICA, MARION 130.00 ART WORK SOLD 405066 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 130.00 405411 6/30/2016 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 1,141.30 IRRIGATION REPAIR 404762 76496 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 519.10 IRRIGATION REPAIR 404763 76497 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,660.40 405412 6/30/2016 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 526.30 T-KNOB "N" LOGO 404764 44947 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 652.45 POOL CHEMICALS 404765 44954 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 1,178.75 405413 6/30/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 89.00- 404803 3102370 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 706.50 404694 3106935 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,017.00 404958 3108411 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7.00- 404805 349468 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14.84- 404804 349469 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,612.66 405414 6/30/2016 106304 ASPEN MILLS 79.82 UNIFORMS 00003810 405009 182451 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 326.26 00003777 405010 182584 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 346.31 00003804 405011 182585 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 167.41 00003801 405012 182586 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 639.66 00003797 405013 182587 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,559.46 405415 6/30/2016 138657 BACH, TOM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 - 6/30/2016 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Page - 7 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405415 6/30/2016 138657 BACH, TOM Continued... 31.24 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404941 6816 CHAPEL 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LANE 31.24 405416 6/30/2016 121083 BARR, FRANK 71.50 ART WORK SOLD 405067 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 71.50 405417 6/30/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 34.99 BATTERIES 00001218 404308 018-104594-01 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 34.99 405418 6/30/2016 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 270.00 404696 8891 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 824.50 404695 8979 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,094.50 405419 6/30/2016 101343 BEHR, JASON 27.17 TRAINING EXPENSE 404767 062216 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 77.91 TRAINING EXPENSE 404767 062216 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 105.08 405420 6/30/2016 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 31.85 ART WORK SOLD 405068 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.85 405421 6/30/2016 137585 BENSON, BARBARA 3.25 ART WORK SOLD 405069 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 3.25 405422 6/30/2016 125227 BERGUM, MOLLY 3.25 ART WORK SOLD 405070 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 3.25 405423 6/30/2016 103694 BERNDT, TAMMY 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404925 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405424 6/30/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 398.30 404808 304432 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405424 6/30/2016 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 310.50 404809 304433 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 708.80 405425 6/30/2016 132641 BEST, KATIE 28.60 ART WORK SOLD 405071 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 28.60 405426 6/30/2016 106453 BLAYLOCK PLUMBING CO. 54.64 PERMIT REFUND 404310 ED148105 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 54.64 405427 6/30/2016 138010 BOB THE WEBSITE BUILDER 180.00 WEBSITE DESIGN 405014 4186 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 180.00 405428 6/30/2016 136855 BOBER, SARAH 3.25 ART WORK SOLD 405072 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 3.25 405429 6/30/2016 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 60.66 TOOLS 404312 911392632 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 83.38 HAND HOLE COVER 00001159 404313 911395800 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 144.04 405430 6/30/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 137.50 404959 134708 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 137.50 405431 6/30/2016 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 400.00 CLUBHOUSE RENTAL 404867 MUSIC IN EDINA 2611.6150 BUILDING RENTAL MUSIC IN EDINA 292.62 ROOM RENTAL 404868 WINE & CANVAS 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 692.62 405432 6/30/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 253.15 404819 1080488429 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,702.35 404818 1080488430 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,488.10 404697 1080488431 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 3,409.10 404698 1080488432 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,047.73 404963 1080488433 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 70.65 404964 1080488494 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 - 6/30/2016 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Page - 9 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405432 6/30/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 721.15 404813 1080488497 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,411.50 404814 1080488498 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,641.65 404812 1080488499 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 83.58 404815 1080488500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 8,773.59 404810 1080488502 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 658.35 404816 1080488503 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \NINE YORK SELLING 2,485.05 404817 1080488534 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 235.15 404811 1080488535 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 235.15- 404699 2080134926 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 24.00- 404820 2080138835 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 73.81- 404965 2080140127 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 51.00- 404966 2080140351 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 28,597.14 405433 6/30/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 6,026.68 404702 1090576377 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 155.10 404703 1090576378 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,405.60 404706 1090576379 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 23.80 404704 1090576380 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,830.35 404705 1090576481 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,235.65 404700 1090577278 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 120.00 404701 1090577279 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 13,797.18 405434 6130/2016 138645 BRENNY, JANE 6.35 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404942 3509 FULLER ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 6.35 405435 6/30/2016 138672 BRICHTA, ANDREA 2,817.58 DAMAGES DUE TO WATER SHUTOFF 405114 REIMBURSE 01430.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 2,817.58 405436 6/30/2016 138666 BRISCOE, CAMERON 11.64 ED PK BIRTHDAY PARTY 405063 REFUND 5700.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 160.00 ED PK BIRTHDAY PARTY 405063 REFUND 5701.4557 BIRTHDAY RENTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 171.64 405437 6/30/2016 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/12/16 404304 062216 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 — Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405437 405438 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 130485 BRUESKE, TARA Continued... 200.00 FARMER'S MARKET 7/21/16 404301 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 405439 6/30/2016 116124 BRUHL, LEO 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404926 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARKADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405440 6/30/2016 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 510.99 AG-LIME 404870 15199 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 510.99 405441 6/30/2016 125271 BURNETT, KARLA 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404927 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405442 6/30/2016 138650 BURNETT, MICHAEL 80.30 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404943 4514 WOODDALE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 80.30 405443 6/30/2016 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 405073 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.50 405444 6/30/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 122.15 404707 00011196 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,740.30 404821 935940 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,186.54 404708 935941 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13,048.99 405445 6/30/2016 137524 CAPRI BIG BAND 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/13/16 404305 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405446 6/30/2016 137196 CARL M HANSEN COMPANIES 2,500.00 ED136733 ESCROW REFUND 404625 5152 KESLEY 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS CIRCLE 7,500.00 ED146591 ESCROW REFUND 404625 5152 KESLEY 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS CIRCLE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 -- Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405446 405447 6/30/2016 137196 CARL M HANSEN COMPANIES 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 6/30/2016 10,000.00 1,195.04 10437426-9 404627 10437426-6/16 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 128.43 5563827-4 404628 5563827-6/16 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 20.65 5584310-6 405016 5584310-6/16 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 134.56 5590919-6 405015 5590919-6/16 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 33.87 5596524-8 404768 5596524-6/16 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 785.67 9724639-1 404626 9724639-6/16 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,298.22 405448 6/30/2016 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. 847.39 6204072 404629 3243922 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,456.72 5566163 404630 3244162 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 3,304.11 405449 6/30/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 62.77 952 944-6522 404631 6522-6/16 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 62.77 405450 6/30/2016 138669 CHAROENSIT, NUNTANIT 60.00 TENNIS SESS. #2 405115 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 60.00 405451 6/30/2016 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 8,162.00 PHEP/CRI AND EBOLA 404769 12809 1492.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PH EMERGENCY PREPARDNESS 8,162.00 405452 6/30/2016 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 96.06 00102561-0112920000 404632 112920000-6/16 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER YORK OCCUPANCY 417.22 00113667-0120835016 404871 120835016-6/16 5111.6189 SEWER & WATER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 4,535.53 00110793-0155200000 405017 155200000-6/16 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 57.04 00110793-0155250009 405018 155250009-6/16 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 107.77 00110793-0155250018 405019 155250018-6/16 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 57.04 00110793-0173001000 405020 173001000-6/16 5424.6189 SEWER & WATER RANGE 96.06 00110793-0173001001 405021 173001001-6/16 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5,366.72 405453 6/30/2016 123941 CLAY, CAROL 10.08 ART WORK SOLD 405074 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 — Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405453 6/30/2016 123941 CLAY, CAROL Continued... 10.08 405454 6/30/2016 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 897.49 JUL 2016 MAINTENANCE 404633 M424-002073-7/1 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 6 897.49 405455 6/30/2016 120433 COMCAST 82.49 8772 10 614 0540232 405116 540232-6/16 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 82.49 405456 6/30/2016 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 18,960.64 HOT MIX 405117 061516 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 18,960.64 405457 6/30/2016 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 360.00 MORTAR MIX 00001208 404634 0142261-IN 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 360.00 405458 6/30/2016 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 122.13 CLAY SUPPLIES 00009490 404637 INV000109242 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 27.32 CLAY SUPPLIES 00009485 404636 R200409044 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 269.91 CLAY SUPPLIES 404635 R200409045 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 419.36 405459 6/30/2016 136899 CORRIGAN, KAT 172.25 ART WORK SOLD 405075 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 172.25 405460 6/30/2016 102596 CROWN TROPHY 209.25 PLAQUES 404638 14131 2610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 209.25 405461 6/30/2016 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 5.20 ART WORK SOLD 405076 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5.20 405462 6/30/2016 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 47,365.00 SCADA RADIO UPGRADE 00001024 405022 10689 4616.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SCADA Radio System Upgrade 47,365.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 — 6/30/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405462 405463 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 103176 DANICIC, JOHN Continued... 10.40 ART WORK SOLD 405077 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 10.40 405464 6/30/2016 132356 DAVE ALAN HOMES INC. 2,500.00 ED132423 ESCROW REFUND 359285 4022 GRIMES AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 405465 6/30/2016 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,722.65 JULY 2016 PREMIUMS 404770 F018342-7/16 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,722.65 405466 6/30/2016 124357 DELANEY, ALICE 104.00 ART WORK SOLD 405078 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 104.00 405467 6/30/2016 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 151.00 PRESSURE KIT 00005437 404642 103046 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.78 WRENCH 00005412 404641 103053 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.42 THERMOMETERS 00005438 404639 103056 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.41 HOSE 00005439 404640 103092 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.19 WHEEL PULLER, JAW 00005440 404643 103290 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,350.00 REFRIGERANT RECOVERY 00005443 404872 103678 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.58 STYLUS 00005382 405023 104544 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,612.38 405468 6/30/2016 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 60.00 TACTICAL POLOS 404771 12127 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.00 405469 6/30/2016 128869 DEVRIES, GRETCHEN 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404928 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405470 6/30/2016 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 54.24 650487671 405118 650487671-6/16 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 54.24 406471 6/30/2016 138285 DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 — Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405471 6130/2016 138285 DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE INC. Continued... 12,047.80 FORENSIC SOFTWARE 405119 33525 2320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FED DRUG FORFEITURE 12,047.80 405472 6/30/2016 124358 DILL, SARAH 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 405079 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.75 405473 6/30/2016 138427 DIXON, RALPHARD 416.00 OFFICIATING FEES 405105 062416 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 416.00 405474 6/30/2016 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 25.35 ART WORK SOLD 405080 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.35 405475 6/30/2016 138671 DOURGARIAN, LAURA 99.00 CANCELED COURSE 405120 REFUND 7414.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 99.00 405476 6/30/2016 138670 DOWNING, ANN 107.25 GOLF BAG REPLACEMENT 405121 062316 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 107.25 405477 6/30/2016 122387 ECOLAB 309.90 DETERGENT 00003813 405024 2152493 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 309.90 405478 6/30/2016 122388 EDEN PRAIRIE POLICE DEPARTMENT 383.16 SWAT SCHOOL 404772 TRAINING 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 383.16 405479 6/30/2016 129504 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 12,098.00 GATE REVENUE SPLIT 404773 1326 5501.4542 SPECTATOR FEES ICE ARENA REVENUES 12,098.00 405480 6/30/2016 105212 EDINA LIONS CLUB 5,000.00 REFUND CK# 1032 404644 BRAEMAR ARENA 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 5,000.00 405481 6/30/2016 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 - 6/30/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405481 6/30/2016 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES Continued... 2,747.50 EDINAART FAIR 405122 062716 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 2,747.50 405482 6/30/2016 126805 ELECTRONIC CENTER 114.89 ANTENNA PARTS 00001166 404645 127584 5934.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 114.89 405483 6/30/2016 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 418.14 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003750 405025 1829139 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 418.14 405484 6/30/2016 137587 EMMER, JILL 12.87 ART WORK SOLD 405081 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.87 405485 6/30/2016 117483 ENGELE, LEE 200.00 FARMER'S MARKET 7/14/16 404300 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 405486 6/30/2016 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 165.87 404968 5833 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 165.87 405487 6/30/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 153.03 CLOCK SPRING 405026 1-5011227 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.50 LINK 404878 1-5013096 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.47 NITRILE GLOVES 404876 1-5017901 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.38 BATTERY 00005398 404647 1-Z07993 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 180.74 CONDENSER 404646 69-227653 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.10 PARTS 404877 69-227729 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.74 OIL 404873 69-227865 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 244.85 ROTORS, SPARK PLUGS, VVIRE SET 405027 69-228423 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.04 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES 405028 69-228448 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150.00 REFRIGERANT 404874 69-228517 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.49 NITRILE GLOVES 404875 69-228542 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.78 BRAKE PADS 405029 69-228544 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,142.12 405488 6/30/2016 100756 FEDEX 16.89 SHIPPING 404648 5-447-13372 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 — 6/30/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405488 6/30/2016 100756 FEDEX Continued... 16.89 405489 6/30/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 6,082.92 HYDRANT REPAIR PARTS 00001171 404880 0194481 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,571.97 LOCATING SUPPLIES 00001022 404879 0195335 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 242.37 FLANGE KIT 00001162 404882 0198447 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 2,458.33 3" COMPOUND METER 00001162 404881 0198449 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 10,355.59 405490 6/30/2016 137583 FER-PAL CONSTRUCTION USA LLC 47,408.85 WATER MAIN LINING - FINAL 405030 MORNINGSIDE NEI 05556.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Morningside Water Main Lining 47,408.85 405491 6/30/2016 133257 FILBIN, SUZANNE 1.95 ART WORK SOLD 405082 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1.95 405492 6/30/2016 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 1,250.00 RAMP WINDOW WASHING 405124 2315-15969 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,275.00 405125 2315-15970 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,525.00 405493 6/30/2016 103985 FLOR, JON 2,100.00 PAR 3 ILLUSTRATIONS 404774 2496 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,100.00 405494 6/30/2016 137685 FORTERRA BUILDING PRODUCTS 282.62 CATCH BASIN 00001168 404649 SH00006824 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 282.62 405495 6/30/2016 138639 FRASER EVELYN HOUSE 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404929 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARKADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405496 6/30/2016 138638 FRASER OAKLAND HOUSE 42.00 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404930 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 42.00 405497 6/30/2016 102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. 42,235.04 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 404883 SIDEWALK 07111.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5-111 INTERLACHEN BLVD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 -- Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405497 6/30/2016 102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. Continued... 42,235.04 405498 6/30/2016 138651 GERMANN, MARILYN 34.34 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404944 6813 BROOK DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 34.34 405499 6/30/2016 130239 GLADWIN MACHINERY & SUPPLY CO 99.30 PUNCH & DIE SETS 00005378 405032 SIM.67423 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.30 405500 6/30/2016 134782 GORRA, COLLEEN 89.00 ART CAMP REFUND 404650 171587 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 89.00 ART CLASS REFUND 405126 177940 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 178.00 405501 6/30/2016 101103 GRAINGER 183.38 PIPE WRENCH 00001082 404653 9131098726 5915.6556 TOOLS WATER TREATMENT 133.59 LIGHT BULBS, DOOR WEDGES, FAN00002218 404775 9136008191 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 305.30 BATTERIES, GLOVES, EAR PLUGS 00005338 404652 9136362846 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 434.72 00005360 405035 9140932527 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 39.29 ANTI-SLIP BLACK TAPE 00002150 404776 9141855842 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 40.44 WATER HOSE 00005381 404884 9142528067 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 434.72- 405036 9142925784 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 83.00 ELECTRICAL TAPE 00005381 405034 9143833656 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 38.77 BATTERIES 00001227 405033 9144720456 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 823.77 405502 6/30/2016 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 64.95 ALIGNMENT 404885 98881 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.95 405503 6/30/2016 120201 GRANICUS INC. 500.00 SPEAK UP EDINA SITE 404651 77443 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN -MIS 690.00 WEBSTREAMING - JULY 2016 404651 77443 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,190.00 405504 6/30/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 82.25 404822 MN00006084 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 234.25 404709 MN00006087 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 316.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 — Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405504 6/30/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Continued... 405505 6/30/2016 136517 GRAY, SUSANNA 124.80 ART WORK SOLD 405083 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 124.80 405506 6/30/2016 138644 GREENBERT, CRAIG 13.61 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404945 4829 VALLEY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET VIEW 13.61 405507 6/30/2016 138640 GROEN, ANITA 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404931 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARKADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405508 6/30/2016 137730 HAACK, BRENDA 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 405084 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.75 405509 6/30/2016 138652 HARNESS, BEVERLY 125.00 UTILITY REFUND- FINAL 404946 4609 CASCADE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LANE 125.00 405510 6/30/2016 138653 HARRIS, HAL 168.43 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404947 4812 66TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 168.43 405511 6/30/2016 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,174.96 CHEMICALS 00005329 404654 3896617 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,174.96 405512 6/30/2016 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 4,533.79 HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 00001035 404886 F639781 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 4,533.79 HYDRANT REPLACEMENT 00001137 404887 F654201 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 9,067.58 405513 6/30/2016 117366 HEMSTAD, BETTY 14.92 ART WORK SOLD 405085 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.92 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 -- 6/30/2016 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Page - 19 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405514 6/30/2016 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER Continued... 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 404655 44945 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 406516 6/30/2016 131578 HEYMER, KATIE 295.00 TRAINING EXPENSE 405127 REIMBURSE 7414.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 295.00 405616 6/30/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,301.56 404710 000071 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,099.00 404825 833214 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 58.00 404711 833261 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 58.00 404824 833608 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,576.00 404823 833609 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,092.56 405517 6/30/2016 108658 HOME DEPOT 145.59 ED145228 PERMIT REUFND 405128 6612 BRITTANY 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS RD 145.59 405518 6/30/2016 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 157.81 404889 061316 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 170.50 404889 061316 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 328.31 405519 6/30/2016 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 1,380.00 MURIATIC ACID 404777 160531090 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,380.00 405520 6/30/2016 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 10.27 ART WORK SOLD 405086 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 10.27 405521 6/30/2016 134784 IDEA CREEK LLC, THE 130.00 PLAQUE 00003798 405037 76 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 130.00 405522 6/30/2016 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 417.20 404778 608489015 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 417.20 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405522 405523 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY Continued... 300.00 404712 40615 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 300.00 405524 6/30/2016 119808 INTEGRA 60.84 405038 13940195 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 60.84 405525 6/30/2016 102640 IPMA-HR 41.90- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 404891 09606-Q4P4P4 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 393.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 404890 INV-17123-N8G1K 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 2 351.10 405526 6/30/2016 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 3.17 405039 053116 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 35.17 405039 053116 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 38.34 405527 6/30/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR 01ST. OF MINN 10.00 404828 2491773 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,144.75 404713 2537011 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,782.40 404826 2537033 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 63.40 404827 2537036 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 7,910.28 404970 2537040 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 171.35 404969 2537041 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18,082.18 405528 6/30/2016 138425 JOELSON, ERICA 225.15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 404659 062016 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 225.15 405529 6/30/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 71.43 404715 5452198 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.64 404716 5461486 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 171.48 404724 5467246 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 66.82 404723 5467247 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,209.36 404721 5467248 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 306.95 404722 5467249 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 - 6/30/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Page - 21 Business Unit 405529 6/30/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 546.12 404720 5467251 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 420.18 404719 5467252 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,729.10 404718 5467253 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 113.07 404717 5467254 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 240.82 404714 5468748 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,131.60 404725 5468849 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 444.00 404971 5471482 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 268.82 404978 5472643 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 33.41 404979 5472644 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING .58 404976 5472646 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .58 404986 5472647 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,105.58 404980 5472648 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 122.16 404981 5472651 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 562.12 404984 5472652 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 709.40 404975 5472653 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,660.88 404985 5472655 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,185.36 404987 5472656 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,755.74 404983 5472657 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 576.02 404989 5472658 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,322.30 404988 5472659 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,063.30 404982 5472660 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,414.89 404990 5472661 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,681.56 404830 5472664 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,137.49 404977 5472666 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,303.47 404829 5472667 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,933.73 404972 5472668 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21.99 404973 5472669 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 579.27 404832 5472670 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,018.39 404974 5472671 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 113.07 404831 5472672 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 23.15- 404727 577658 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 225.16- 404726 577659 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 47,777.37 405530 6/30/2016 138643 JOHNSON, CYNTHIA 21.00 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404933 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE RED PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 21.00 405531 6/30/2016 138641 JOHNSON, LAURA 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404932 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE RED PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO4 Doc No 6/30/2016 — Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405531 6/30/2016 138641 JOHNSON, LAURA Continued... 10.50 405532 6/30/2016 116394 JOHNSTON, STEVE 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/12/16 404303 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 405533 6/30/2016 102603 JONAS, LENORE 102.03 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 404892 062216 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 102.03 405534 6/30/2016 138278 JUST 4 GOLF ACCESSORIES LLC 162.27 ACCESSORIES 405040 9946 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 162.27 405535 6/30/2016 131439 KAPLAN KIRSCH & ROCKWELL LLP 5,592.06 MAY 2016 SERVICES 404893 0510-01 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 5,592.06 405536 6/30/2016 131516 KARKHOFF, NANCY 202.14 404779 062216 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 490.00 404779 062216 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 692.14 405537 6/30/2016 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 21.25 KEYS 00001141 404660 SI032396 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.25 405538 6/30/2016 138642 KIELAS, BRIDGET 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404934 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405539 6/30/2016 138648 KRENZKE, JOHN 130.60 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404948 6337 MILDRED 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 130.60 405540 6/30/2016 134445 KRIEGER, RYAN 30.19 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404949 4521 70TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 30.19 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 -- 6/30/2016 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Page - 23 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405541 6/30/2016 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS Continued.. 210.00 IMPOUND FEE 404661 75519 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 210.00 405542 6/30/2016 134185 LACER, MARY 163.15 ART WORK SOLD 405087 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 163.15 405543 6/30/2016 138660 LAND TITLE INC. 275,000.00 TIF FOR 66 WEST APARTMENTS 405129 1ST INSTALLMENT 9238.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 275,000.00 405544 6/30/2016 133189 LANDMARK BUILDING CONTRACTORS 2,298.30 ED142281 ESCROW REFUND 404781 6021 KELLOGG 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,298.30 405545 6/30/2016 100605 LANDS END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 225.70 LOGO SHIRTS 404780 SIN3785873 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 225.70 LOGO SHIRTS 404780 SIN3785873 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 225.70 LOGO SHIRTS 404780 SIN3785873 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 2,110.41 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 404662 SIN3913572 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 46.55 404663 SIN3933682 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 2,834.06 405546 6/30/2016 138111 LANG BUILDERS INC. 7,500.00 ED144962 ESCROW REFUND 404782 5549 YORK AVE S 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 7,500.00 405547 6/30/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 129.87 DRILL BITS, CONNECTORS 00005434 404664 9304156114 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 408.58 SCREWS, MINI BULBS, BITS 00005416 405041 9304172333 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 538.45 405548 6/30/2016 133524 LINDEMANN, TRISTEN 46.54 ART WORK SOLD 405088 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 46.54 405549 6/30/2016 114593 MAAP 95.00 MITZI WICKLUND 404666 2016 WORKSHOP 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 95.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 — Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405550 6/30/2016 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. Continued... 500.00 EQUIPMENT TRAINING 404667 TRAINING001 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 500.00 405551 6/30/2016 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12,237.62 UNLEADED FUEL 00005397 404896 496081 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12,237.62 405552 6/30/2016 138654 MASTABA LLC 27.12 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404950 5929 GRIMES 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 27.12 405553 6/30/2016 129579 MAVERICK CUTTING & BREAKING LLC 400.00 CORE DRILLING 00005362 404668 19038 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 400.00 405554 6/30/2016 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/14/16 404306 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 405555 6/30/2016 125133 MCLAUGHLIN, DIANE 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404935 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405556 6/30/2016 134187 MCMAHON, MARY JO 79.95 ART WORK SOLD 405089 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 79.95 405557 6/30/2016 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,135.25 ROCHESTER TRIP 405042 062016 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,135.25 405558 6/30/2016 101987 MENARDS 12.95 SHELF, BRACKETS 00002150 404783 98494 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 12.95 405559 6/30/2016 104650 MICRO CENTER 15.97 ANTENNA CABLES 00001209 404897 6153702 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 15.97 405560 6/30/2016 101356 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 -- 6/30/2016 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405560 6/30/2016 101356 MIDWEST FENCE S, MFG COMPANY Continued... 3,933.70 FENCE 405131 168591 01267.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 MSA Maintenance Projects 3,933.70 405561 6/30/2016 122473 MILLER, CHICHI 36.69 ART WORK SOLD 405090 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 36.69 405562 6/30/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 4,292.50 FULL SERVICE REPLACEMENT 00001169 404898 35225 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,292.50 405563 6/30/2016 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 66.00 FORFEITURE FORMS 404784 200000819 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.00 405564 6/30/2016 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 792.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT 404785 629430-5176 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 792.00 405565 6/30/2016 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 261.58 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 404672 10000011119 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 261.58 405566 6/30/2016 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 500.00 THERMAL PATCH 00001167 404673 74083 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 500.00 405567 6/30/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 239.00 POSTCARDS 404786 20567 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP 123.00 PUBLIC ART BALLOTS 404674 20616 2610.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC ART 362.00 405568 6/30/2016 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 74.08 WIRE ASSEMBLIES 00005413 404675 542246F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.20 ARM ASSEMBLY 00005415 404899 542274F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.16 BUSHINGS 00005415 404900 542275F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 86.90 ARM ASSEMBLY 00005415 404901 542300F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 257.34 405569 6/30/2016 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 — 6/30/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO4 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405569 6/30/2016 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM Continued... 728.00 OFFICIATING FEES 405106 062416 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 728.00 405570 6/30/2016 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 4,090.00 MN GOLF MAGAZINE AD 405043 2016-57889 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 4,090.00 405571 6/30/2016 124121 MULLANEY, MARLA 15.60 ART WORK SOLD 405091 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.60 405572 6/30/2016 114343 MULLEN, JANET 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 405092 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 405573 6/30/2016 132644 NELSON LINDALL, ALICE 46.80 ART WORK SOLD 405093 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 46.80 405574 6/30/2016 121125 NEMER, KAREN 2.28 ART WORK SOLD 405094 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.28 405575 6/30/2016 138540 NIETO, RODOLFO 60.00 MODEL 405132 062416 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00 405576 6/30/2016 104350 NIKE USA INC. 36.55 MERCHANDISE 405044 988354263 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 36.55 405577 6/30/2016 138655 NORBERG, ROGER 18.78 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404951 4240 LYNN AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 18.78 405578 6/30/2016 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 812.58 LIGHTING 00005408 405045 41484 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 812.58 405579 6/30/2016 124089 OHMANN, NANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier [Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - 6/30/2016 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405579 6/30/2016 124089 OHMANN, NANCY Continued... 25.35 ART WORK SOLD 405095 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.35 405580 6/30/2016 123786 OLSON, VICKI 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 405096 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 405581 6/30/2016 138662 ON SITE SANITATION-TWIN CITIES 3736.04 ONSITE RESTROOM TRAILER 405046 270175 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 3,736.04 405582 6/30/2016 101659 ORKIN 20.00 28438083 PEST CONTROL 404787 28438083-5/16 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 20.00 28441102 PEST CONTROL 404788 28441102-5/16 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 40.00 405583 6/30/2016 138647 PAN, DAVID 62.38 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404952 4940 POPPY LANE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 62.38 405584 6/30/2016 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 31.85 ART WORK SOLD 405097 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ARTCENTERREVENUES 31.85 405585 6/30/2016 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 141.00 404731 16117 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 141.00 405586 6/30/2016 102440 PASS, GRACE 41.60 ART WORK SOLD 405098 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 41.60 405587 6/30/2016 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING 44.88 CATERED FOOD 404789 0702 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 44.88 405588 6/30/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,089.70 404835 8552469-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.25 404834 8552472-IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,245.70 404732 8552477-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405588 6/30/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 36.25 404733 8552479-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,407.90 405589 6/30/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 663.90 404734 53942905 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 663.90 405590 6/30/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 48.00- 404740 235836 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VMNE VERNON SELLING 78.00- 404741 235837 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.10- 404742 235849 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.10- 404743 235852 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 281.16- 404744 239199 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 281.16- 404739 239201 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 427.82 404737 2993966 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 719.57 404738 2993967 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 278.19 404736 2993968 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 286.23 404735 2993969 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3.48 404992 2997593 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 113.91 404996 2997595 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 434.53 404997 2997597 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 691.04 404994 2997600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 65.16 404995 2997601 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,368.19 404993 2997602 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,093.23 404991 2997603 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 508.13 404838 2997606 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.16 404839 2997607 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,394.79 404837 2997608 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,729.87 404836 2997609 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,486.78 405591 6/30/2016 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC. 635.15 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003808 405048 116118107 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 122.83 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003808 405050 116119167 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 EMS FAXING 405051 116119463 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 405049 416125067 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,507.98 405592 6/30/2016 133460 PITSCHKA, CHARLES 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 405099 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 — Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405592 6/30/2016 133460 PITSCHKA, CHARLES Continued... 16.25 405593 6/30/2016 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC 1,101.36 SLIDE FOR PAMELA PARK 404902 1400201061 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,101.36 405594 6/30/2016 120988 PLYMOUTH FRAMERY 140.00 FRAMING FOR 2 ARTICLES 404790 067017 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 140.00 405595 6/30/2016 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 62.13 PUMPHEAD 00005375 404676 25542-27033S0 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.13 405596 6/30/2016 101744 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS 500.00 GUIDE BAR BRACKETS 00001130 404905 32065 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 500.00 405597 6/30/2016 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 520.00 OFFICIATING FEES 405107 062416 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 520.00 405598 6/30/2016 102011 RIVER CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/11/16 404302 060116 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405599 6/30/2016 138541 RUDIN, JACOB 135.00 MODEL 405133 062416 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 135.00 405600 6/30/2016 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 36.78 405134 040237306935 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 113.37 405134 040237306935 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 150,15 405601 6/30/2016 137771 SAND CREEK GROUP LTD, THE 1,805.98 COACHING SERVICES 404677 94190 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 1,805.98 405602 6/30/2016 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 — 6/30/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Bus ness Unit 405602 6/30/2016 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT Continued... 416.00 OFFICIATING FEES 405108 062416 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 416.00 405603 6/30/2016 135287 SEABERG, KURT 2.93 ART WORK SOLD 405100 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.93 405604 6/30/2016 129473 SEAGREN, GREG 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404936 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405605 6/30/2016 100995 SEH 1,882.25 54TH ST BID DOCS 404909 316811 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 7,615.53 ARDEN PARK BID DOCS 404906 316812 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 7,474.91 MORNINGSIDE/WHITE OAKS 404908 316814 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORN1NGSIDE A 2,714.15 MORNINGSIDE/WHITE OAKS 404908 316814 01438.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 Recon White Oaks C 3,830.07 MORNINGSIDE/WHITE OAKS 404908 316814 03492.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Morningside A & White Oaks C 4,326.49 MORNINGSIDEANHITE OAKS 404908 316814 05558.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Morningside A & White Oaks C 3,210.55 MORN1NGSIDE/VVHITE OAKS 404908 316814 04416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Morningside A & White Oaks C 37,325.71 TRACY AVE RAB 404907 316815 01430.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 26,674.71 WINTER REC. AT BRAEMAR 404792 316816 47099.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Braemar Winter Recreation 1,797.00 WATERMAIN PCA 404910 316845 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 96,851.37 405606 6/30/2016 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 TRASHROOM FLOOR CLEANING 405135 55175 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,650.00 405136 55176 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 3,300.00 405607 6/30/2016 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 66.95 ART WORK SOLD 405101 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 66.95 405608 6/30/2016 119909 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 48.15 PAINT 00001142 404678 2658-8 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.15 405609 6/30/2016 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 132.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 404793 062116 5760.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 132.52 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405609 405610 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 138658 SHOFF, VICKI Continued... 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404937 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARKADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405611 6/30/2016 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 38.32 ART WORK SOLD 405102 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 38.32 405612 6/30/2016 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 533.00 P/A SYSTEM SERVICE CALL 405137 82586546 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 585.60 ALARM SERVICE 405053 82611905 7411.6250 ALARM SERVICE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,118.60 405613 6/30/2016 138636 SINGH, RUCHIKA 65.00 TENNIS CLASS CANCELED 404794 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 65.00 405614 6/30/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 341.45 PROSECUTOR PRO, ROUNDUP 00001149 404679 76257113 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 341.45 405615 6/30/2016 132195 SMALL LOT MN 270.27 404745 7892 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 270.27 405616 6/30/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 254.88 WRENCH SET 00005374 404680 ARV/29252121 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 254.88 405617 6/30/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 160.00- 404747 0024941 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,564.40 404746 1419119 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 135.80 404748 1420489 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING .80 404751 1420490 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,780.27 404752 1420491 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,007.00 404998 1421761 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 710.15 404999 1421762 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,999.53 404846 1421765 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,726.86 404845 1421766 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405617 6/30/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 278.80 404848 1421767 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,384.90 404847 1421768 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,146.40 404844 1421769 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 5,514.13 404843 1421770 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,428.67 404841 1421771 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,728.66 404750 1421772 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 200.80 404842 1421773 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,695.47 404840 1421774 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,505.02 404749 1421775 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33,647.66 405618 6/30/2016 110977 SOW, ADAMA 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 405103 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 405619 6/30/2016 130640 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS INC. 549.85 CLUBHOUSE EXTERIOR 405054 30927 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 549.85 405620 6/30/2016 116175 ST. CROIX HARLEY-DAVIDSON 433.05 MOTORCYCLE OIL CHANGES 405056 6/16 STMT 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 433.05 405621 6/30/2016 103265 STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES INC 53.64 SHELVING 405055 58908 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 53.64 405622 6/30/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 243.50 404849 11316 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 243.50 405623 6/30/2016 129409 STEEN, BARB 121.88 ART WORK SOLD 405104 061716 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 121.88 405624 6/30/2016 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 500.00 MOVIE RENTAL 405057 DB2195571 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 500.00 405625 6/30/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 — 6/30/2016 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Page - 33 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405625 6/30/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA Continued... 690.30 CONCESSION PRODUCT 404795 606171597 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,088.54 404796 606200650 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 391.15 404797 606210978 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 15.77 RECEIPT HOLDERS 404798 606220505 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 2,185.76 405626 6/30/2016 104932 TAYLOR MADE 77.05 PANTS 405058 31770462 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 204.11 HATS 405059 31784120 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 281.16 405627 6/30/2016 129120 TC RUNNING COMPANY 630.00 UNIFORM SHORTS 404799 4223 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 630.00 405628 6/30/2016 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 104.76 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 404800 062216 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 104.76 405629 6/30/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,512.50- 404755 00090242 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,743.45 404850 1100288 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,200.00 404753 1100684 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 186.90 404754 1102730 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,617.85 405630 6/30/2016 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 292.74 PRINTER USAGE 405060 65036576 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 292.74 405631 6/30/2016 128835 TOWN & COUNTRY CLEANING CO. INC. 6,745.00 CITY HALL WINDOW WASHING 405139 W516696 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 6,745.00 405632 6/30/2016 138676 UNIVERSAL SERVICES 1,842.00 UNDERGROUND REPAIRS 00001095 405140 13982 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 3,401.50 SERVICE UPGRADE-STREET LIGHT80001096 405141 13983 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5,243.50 405633 6/30/2016 102090 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier/Explanation PO # Doc No 6/30/2016 - Inv No 6/30/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405633 6/30/2016 102090 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE Continued... 760.00 ULI MEMBERSHIP 405142 2080697 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 760.00 405634 6/30/2016 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 6,790.85 DEHUMIDIFIER 00001161 404914 978840 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 6,790.85 405635 6/30/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 53.74 SOAP, UTENSILS 404918 390739-00 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 505.35 LIQUOR BAGS 404917 390740-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 50.57 CAN LINERS 404916 390742-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 60.12 TOWELS 404916 390742-00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 504.25 LIQUOR BAGS 404915 390743-00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 23.32 CAN LINERS, PAPER PLATES 404802 390744-00 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 422.82 LIQUOR BAGS 404801 390745-00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 54.44- RETURN 404919 390801C1 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 935.84 TOWELS, TISSUE, LINERS, SOAP 405062 390879-00 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,501.57 405636 6/30/2016 136793 VECCHIO SMITH, MARGARET 68.00 SIGNED UP TWICE FOR TENNIS 377651 REFUND 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL 68.00 405637 6/30/2016 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 104.25 TIE ROD 404920 617160002 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 104.25 405638 6/30/2016 138628 VICKER, THOMAS 41.22 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 404683 5704 PARKWOOD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 41.22 405639 6/30/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 48.96 NYLON PLUGS 00001111 404684 1482563 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,905.00 BACKUP GENERATOR BREAKER 00001131 404922 1502306 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,676.28 TRANSFORMER 00001116 404921 1525837 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,630.24 405640 6/30/2016 132751 WARNING LITES OF MN 529.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPPLIES 00001170 404923 156847 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 529.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 35 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 -- 6/30/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405640 405641 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 132751 WARNING LITES OF MN 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN Continued... 72.30 405143 0019393 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 84.09 405143 0019393 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 101.15 405143 0019393 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 167.66 405143 0019393 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 266.76 405143 0019393 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 344.35 405143 0019393 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 461.57 405143 0019393 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 528.57 405143 0019393 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 528.57 405143 0019393 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 71.08 405143 0019393 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 341.22 405143 0019393 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 171.75 405143 0019393 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 344.88 405143 0019393 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 1,283.21 405143 0019393 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENArBLDG/GROUNDS 1,336.95 405143 0019393 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 87.23 405143 0019393 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 306.02 405143 0019393 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 6,497.36 405642 6/30/2016 138646 WATSON, LEE 180.55 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404953 406 TYLER AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 180.55 405643 6/30/2016 138677 WHALEY, TOM 1,429.40 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 405144 REIMBURSE 01416.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 54TH ST BRIDGE&STREET REPAIR 1,429.40 405644 6/30/2016 138656 WHEELER, FRANK 22.10 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 404954 4619 EDINA BLVD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 22.10 405645 6/30/2016 130487 WHEELOCK, PATRICIA 65.00 ROCHESTER TRIP REFUND 404939 062116 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 65.00 405646 6/30/2016 138678 WHITMAN, PETER 119.99 STEEL TOE BOOTS 405145 REIMBURSE 1263.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENVIRONMENT 119.99 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:20 Council Check Register by GL Page - 36 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 6/30/2016 — 6/30/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405646 405647 6/30/2016 6/30/2016 138678 WHITMAN, PETER 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued.. 133.16- 404858 708299 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 807.91 404855 7086040 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20.91 404854 7086041 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,590.96 404856 7087022 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,936.44 405003 7087025 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,059.04 404857 7087026 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 8,282.10 405648 6/30/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY 35.43 51-4151897-6 404687 505086069 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 56.29 51-5276505-8 404685 505105916 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 25.83 51-7567037-0 404686 505128565 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 106.27 5 1-001 0025256-3 404689 505163455 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 15.27 5 1-001 0613106-9 404688 505175833 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 239.09 405649 6/30/2016 138659 YASMINEH, ANN 10.50 WATER AEROBICS CLASS 404938 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARKADMIN. GENERAL 10.50 405650 6/30/2016 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 1,124.94 VEHICLE REPAIRS 404924 15265 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,124.94 1,069,126.59 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 957,839.28 111,287.31 1,069,126.59 Fluance 1 1 Z1 I In Amain& 411 .0er R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 6/28/2016 10:47:31 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 6/30/2016 - 6/30/2016 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 203,924.98 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 13,049.80 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 732.25 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 148,906.99 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,714.15 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,640.27 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 224.49 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 8,319.99 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 16,028.75 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 14,283.89 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 1,304.39 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 4,541.50 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,567.02 05800 LIQUOR FUND 204,259.45 05900 UTILITY FUND 154,809.31 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 5,521.53 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,575.18 09238 SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 275,000.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,722.65 Report Totals 1,069,126.59 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and proce res date R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 - Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3348 7/7/2016 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 98.36 ADAPTER 00005449 405562 0148040-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.36 3349 7/7/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 68.80 405147 2011468 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 28.80 405495 2016344 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 66.00 405146 2016351 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 47.20 405148 2016356 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 113.60 405496 2017715 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 137.60 405493 2017718 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 40.00 405494 2017723 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 502.00 3350 7/7/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 466.65 COFFEE 405201 1232367 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 466.65 3351 7/7/2016 100638 BACHMAN'S 412.97 PLANT REPLACEMENT 405253 827099/50 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 412.97 3352 7/7/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 193.85 405356 53986100 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 551.04 405152 54084300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 545.30 405503 54304400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 179.55 405504 54304700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,469.74 3353 7/7/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 75.37 BANK BAGS, PAPER 00002220 405429 WO-208331-1 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 41.28 WALL SIGN HOLDERS 00002220 405429 WO-208331-1 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 161.80 NAME BADGES, MAILING LABELS 405402 WO-209788-1 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 278.45 3354 7/7/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 55.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 405203 119724 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 39.86 405204 119988 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 95.23 3355 7/7/2016 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 -- Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3355 7/7/2016 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. Continued... 28.61 OCE USE 405469 988695501 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 28.61 3356 7/7/2016 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 1,868.71 GETAC MOUNTS 00004328 405208 DCB0909 4616.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SCADA Radio System Upgrade 566.58 PRO SHOP TOUCHSCREEN 00004348 405212 DKQ9988 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 4,514.36 PUBLIC WORKS SWITCH 405209 DKV7105 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 508.50 PW SWITCH REPLACE 405210 DKVV3530 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 24,634.00 PUBLIC WORKS SVVITCH 405211 DLD7983 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 32,092.15 3357 7/7/2016 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 191.00 CLEANERS 405213 519024 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 191.00 3358 7/7/2016 104020 DALCO 1,470.48 CAN LINERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00005339 405216 3037963 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 339.35 WIPERS, TISSUE, TOWELS 00001454 405215 3040775 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,809.83 3359 7/7/2016 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 1,504.80 FIELD PAINT 00001221 405410 112286 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,504.80 3360 7/7/2016 129508 IMPACT 36.75 COUPON INSERTS 405575 114835 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 36.75 COUPON INSERTS 405575 114835 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 36.76 COUPON INSERTS 405575 114835 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 3,379.11 JUNE BILLINGS 405575 114835 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,489.37 3361 7/7/2016 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 7,058.51 PRINT 2016 WATER REPORT 00001251 405279 672900 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 11,306.27 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 405222 672982 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 18,364.78 3362 7/7/2016 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 921.60 CLUBHOUSE INTERIOR CARPENTRY 405614 15020E0200001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 678.00 CLUBHOUSE INTERIOR DOORS 405616 1512900002 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,797.00 CLUBHOUSE INTERIOR VALANCES 405615 152900001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 - Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3362 3363 7/7/2016 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 103217 LHB, INC. Continued... 7/7/2016 3,396.60 29,703.02 GRANDVIEW TRANSPORTATION STUDY 405315 150515.00-8 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 29,703.02 3364 7/7/2016 100858 LOGIS 412.50 IT CONSULTING 405226 41873 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 880.00 IT CONSULTING 405227 41903 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,292.50 3365 7/7/2016 101483 MENARDS 59.88 MURIATIC ACID 00002150 405444 16332 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 23.76 AIR FILTERS 00001237 405416 16694 5861.6406 GENERAL' SUPP LI ES VERNON OCCUPANCY 139.69 LUMBER 00001234 405282 16783 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9.97 SHELVING 00002150 405445 16845 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 383.86 LUMBER, HARDWARE 00001245 405580 16857 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 85.53- RETURN 405581 16878 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 29.96 GROUT, CARPET TAPE, SEALER 00001256 405587 17132 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 69.25 IRRIGATION PIPE, COUPLINGS 00001260 405585 17145 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 21.99- RETURN 405586 17147 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 19.99 FLEXIBLE WATER PIPE 00001260 405584 17151 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 95.31 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 00001259 405582 17154 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 21.99- RETURN 405583 17159 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 702.16 3366 7/7/2016 130141 OENO DISTRIBUTION LLC 608.50 405538 4835 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE 50TH ST SELLING 608.50 3367 7/7/2016 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 419.80 ACCESS PANEL, SAFETY TIES 405451 2698 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 419.80 3368 7/7/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 675.99 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 405234 10159 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 112.28 TISSUE, LINERS 405457 10211 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 238.03 CUPS, NAPKINS 405457 10211 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 613.16 DISINFECTANT, LINERS 00002221 405456 10214 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 193.31 TISSUE, LINERS 405458 10275 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 - Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3368 7/7/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY Continued... 228.80 NITRILE GLOVES 405458 10275 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 2,061.57 3369 7/7/2016 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 205.00 WOOD STAKES 00001215 405594 41402939 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 67.97 WOOD BALLARDS 00001213 405595 41404135 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 272.97 3370 7/7/2016 104672 SPRINT 16.80 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.08 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.04 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 49.30 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 50.40 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.25 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 91.52 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 128.40 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 17.52 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 106.46 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.80 ACCT 873184124 405295 873184124-6/16 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 611.57 3371 7/7/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 41.50 405390 0154950-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 113.50 405554 0154951-IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,220.00 405555 0155396-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.25 405552 0155568-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 158.00 405553 0155571-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,566.25 3372 7/7/2016 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 101.44- 405641 45628346 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 101.44- 405642 45698377 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 631.41 CONCESSION PRODUCT 405638 45791757 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 15.25- 405643 45827340 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 447.03 405639 45854849 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 639.18 405640 45916929 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,499.49 3373 7/7/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 -- 7/7/2016 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 5 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3373 7/7/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 689.20 405556 429781-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 262.30 405391 429782-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1,107.17 405392 429783-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,058.67 405651 7/7/2016 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 80.00 DRIVER SAFETY COURSE 405561 JUNE16 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 80.00 405652 7/7/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 1,771.76 GOLF GLOVES 405604 902722277 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,771.76 405653 7/7/2016 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION 448.80 CO2 405427 33028237 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER 448.80 405654 7/7/2016 114157 AIRTECH THERMEX LLC 729.00 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 405199 1601171 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 729.00 405655 7/7/2016 138694 AKARE COMPANIES LLC 19.56 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405473 5808 FAIRFAX 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 19.56 405656 7/7/2016 118491 APPLE INC. 705.00 IPAD 00004344 405200 4388933773 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 705.00 405657 7/7/2016 138707 ARRINGTON, TIFFANY 9.83 CLASS REFUND 405627 062816 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES 9.83 405658 7/7/2016 136206 ARSENEAULT, PAT 78.50 TOM OYE AWARD 405401 FRAMING 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 78.50 405659 7/7/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,794.50 405150 3108410 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 - Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405659 7/7/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 2,088.00 405149 3108412 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 345.00 405497 3110085 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 575.00 405500 3110086 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 186.90 405501 3110087 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,025.45 405498 3110090 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 89.00 405499 3110091 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,103.85 405660 7/7/2016 138681 AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORP. 1,800.00 SOFTWARE CHANGE SERVICES 405244 3524 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1,800.00 405661 7/7/2016 120995 AVR INC. 881.25 READY MIX 405245 130108 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 412.00 READY MIX 405252 130225 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 841.75 405246 130226 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 872.00 405248 130336 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 811.50 405247 130433 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 2,918.50 405249 130641 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 1,744.00 405250 130712 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 5,424.00 405251 130804 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 13,905.00 405662 7/7/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 60.89 BATTERIES 00001152 405202 018-406367 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 49.75 FLORESCENTS 00008074 405629 020-347215 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 110.64 405663 7/7/2016 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 290.00 405151 9068 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 397.00 405355 9128 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 511.00 405502 9216 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,198.00 405664 7/7/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 504.00 PIZZA 405428 4638780 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 504.00 405665 7/7/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 225.00 405153 304434 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 -- 7/7/2016 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 7 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405665 7/7/2016 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 347.20 405505 305750 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,173.45 405357 305751 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,745.65 405666 7/7/2016 138691 BILDSTEN, ROGER 80.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405474 5100 JUANITA 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 80.00 405667 7/7/2016 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 33.75 UNIFORM PURCHASE 405255 062716 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 33.75 405668 7/7/2016 122248 BUCK ART MATERIALS 303.30 CRAFT SUPPLIES 405254 6114802 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 303.30 405669 7/7/2016 131947 BLOOMINGTON ICE GARDEN 187.73 ICE TIME SCHEDULE ERROR 405256 4271-1 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 187.73 405670 7/7/2016 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 38.85 ELECTRICAL COVERS 00001211 405205 911392639 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 38.85 405671 7/7/2016 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 233.58 GLOVES, AED SUPPLIES 00002150 405431 82182472 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 20.18 HAND WPES 00002150 405430 82182473 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 253.76 405672 7/7/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 388.50 405155 134670 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,873.00 405154 134722 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,052.50 405358 134789 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,314.00 405673 7/7/2016 138682 BOYER MASONRY AND CONCRETE INC. 3,275.00 WATER BREAK REPAIRS 405403 6711 INDIAN 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION HILLS 3,275.00 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary R55CKR2 LOGIS101 7/7/2016 -- 7/7/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405673 405674 7/7/2016 7/7/2016 138682 BOYER MASONRY AND CONCRETE INC. 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 991.23 405156 1080488496 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 380.30 405365 1080489898 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 112.15 405364 1080489899 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 482.93 405157 1080489901 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,986.20 405514 1080491584 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,008.07 405362 1080491586 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 146.30 405363 1080491588 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,054.83 405366 1080491589 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,247.26 405509 1080491590 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 539.26 405511 1080491604 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 274.30 405510 1080491607 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 873.75 405507 1080491609 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,844.75 405506 1080491610 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 102.92 405360 1080491611 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,368.80 405359 1080491613 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,171.50 405508 1080491624 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,053.40 405361 1080491625 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,813.80 405513 1080493129 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 805.96 405512 1080493130 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 121.07- 405158 2080131221 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 118.00- 405367 2080138837 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 170.00- 405159 2080140349 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 27,848.64 405675 7/7/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 5,771.03 405160 1090579327 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,613.05 405161 1090579328 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,846.15 405162 1090579329 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,009.85 405368 1090580044 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,198.90 405516 1090582246 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 320.00 405515 1090582247 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 168.00 405517 1090582248 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 307.50 405517 1090582248 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 23,234.48 405676 7/7/2016 131337 BREMER BANK 440.33 EEEP INTEREST 405467 070116 3301.8220 INTEREST BONDS PIR DS REVENUES 440.33 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 -- Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405676 405677 7/7/2016 7/7/2016 131337 BREMER BANK 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY Continued... 81.02 SPRAYER REPAIR KIT 405206 12669649-00 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1,822.54 ROAD SEALANT, TOOLS 405207 12669649-01 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1,903.56 405678 7/7/2016 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/19/16 405399 060616 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 406679 7/7/2016 132114 BURNETT, JASON 825.41 EEEP INTEREST 405468 070116 3301.8220 INTEREST BONDS PIR DS REVENUES 825.41 405680 7/7/2016 134674 CAPITAL CITY GLASS INC. 25,837.20 ROOF VVINDOW REPLACEMENT 405433 8045 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 25,837.20 405681 7/7/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 40.90 405369 00011202 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,085.00- OVERPAYMENT CREDIT 405432 11191 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,834.35 405518 942046 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,124.10 405371 942047 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 132.00 405370 947993 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,046.35 405682 7/7/2016 129923 CAWLEY 44.74 NAME BADGES 405605 V383038 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 44.74 405683 7/7/2016 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 24.43 10089900-4 405260 10089900-6/16 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 328.93 5546504-1 405259 5546504-6/16 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,454.14 5591458-4 405258 5591458-6/16 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 240.33 8034001-1 405257 8034001-6/16 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,047.83 405684 7/7/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 128.36 952 831-0024 405606 0024-6/16 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 54.73 952 920-1565 405263 1565-6/16 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 — Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405684 7/7/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued.. 59.06 952 920-1586 405262 1586-6/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 79.70 952 922-2444 405264 2444-6/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 134.79 952 920-9996 E911 405261 9996-6/16 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 456.64 405685 7/7/2016 138683 CHESTNUT CAMBRONNE PA 187.50 ATTORNEY FEES 405404 141627 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 187.50 405686 7/7/2016 103040 CITY PAGES 90.00 4TH OF JULY AD 405265 1000322019-6/16 1600.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 90.00 405687 7/7/2016 134478 CLASSICAL ACTORS ENSEMBLE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/26/16 405434 062716 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405688 7/7/2016 100692 COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS 255.96 405519 0168575540 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 255.96 405689 7/7/2016 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 21.18 CONCRETE METAL FORMS 00001136 405266 0141967-IN 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 21.18 405690 7/7/2016 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 1,085.26 CLAY AND SUPPLIES 00009485 405435 INV000108934 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,085.26 405691 7/7/2016 120032 CORPORATE MECHANICAL 16,850.00 REPLACE 3 HVAC UNITS 00004055 405436 20844 5100.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET 16,850.00 405692 7/7/2016 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 44.95 PULLEY 00001234 405563 168459 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 44.95 405693 7/7/2016 127913 CUTTER SALES 6.20 METRIC OIL SEAL 405214 110472 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.20 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 7/7/2016 — 7/7/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405693 7/7/2016 405694 7/7/2016 127913 CUTTER SALES 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Continued... 80.70 GRINDER 00005382 405267 104413 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 80.70 405695 7/7/2016 136484 DIESEL, MIKE 844.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 405607 062916 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 844.00 405696 7/7/2016 101766 DISPLAY SALES 1,263.00 FLAGS 405608 INV-007034 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 1,263.00 405697 7/7/2016 124438 DONNAY HOMES 150.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405475 5825 CHOWEN AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 150.00 405698 7/7/2016 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 3,279.93 CHEMICALS 00001183 405311 827000777-16 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,279.93 405699 7/7/2016 122387 ECOLAB 74.82 CLEANING CADDY BATTERY 405437 2207101 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 74.82 405700 7/7/2016 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 30.00 MEETING - BILL NEUENDORF 405405 JUNE GMM 9232.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 30.00 405701 7/7/2016 138587 EICHENLAUB, STACY 9.83 CLASS REFUND 405628 061416 5501.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ICE ARENA REVENUES 9.83 405702 7/7/2016 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 2,075.00 TOP HATCH - PROMENADE 405268 0058051-IN 04401.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION PROMENADE H2O FEATURE&PATH 2,075.00 405703 7/7/2016 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 869.30 SQUAD BUILDUP 405438 RS4365 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 869.30 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 12 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 - 7/7/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Account No 405703 405704 7/7/2016 7/7/2016 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 239.42 BATTERIES 405218 1-Z08078 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.48 BATTERY 405217 69-228619 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 314.23 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, PAD SETS 405566 69-228966 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.03 SENSOR 405567 69-228967 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 141.29 BRAKE LINING, ROTOR ASSEMBLIES 405565 69-228997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.45 DISC PAD SET, BRAKE DRUMS 405564 69-229723 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 951.90 405705 7/7/2016 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,624.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 405609 062916 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,624.00 405706 7/7/2016 122549 FARNER-BOCKEN COMPANY 701.90 CONCESSION PRODUCT 405630 4886692 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 701.90 405707 7/7/2016 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 16.83 RODS 00001154 405270 MNTC2138045 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 8.91 COUPLERS 00001154 405269 MNTC2138058 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 18.80 CLIPS 405219 MNTC2138059 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 44.54 405708 7/7/2016 138700 FELECHNER, MARY 135.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405476 5924 EWING AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 135.00 405709 7/7/2016 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 912.05 HYDRANT PARTS 00001185 405406 0194481-1 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 912.05 405710 7/7/2016 138685 FIRE CATT LLC 3,598.55 HOSE & LADDER TESTING 00003775 405407 MN-5243 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,598.55 405711 7/7/2016 100764 G & K SERVICES 76.70 ACCT 0039263 405610 1013774697 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 76.70 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 717/2016 -- 7/7/2016 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 13 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405712 7/7/2016 138698 GILMORE, PAULA Continued... 100.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405477 7304 TARA RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 100.00 405713 7/7/2016 130239 GLADWIN MACHINERY & SUPPLY CO 1,023.61 PUNCH & DIE 00005378 405220 SIM.67467 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,023.61 405714 7/7/2016 101103 GRAINGER 31.24 COUPLERS 00001119 405272 9141152158 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 139.94 TUBING CUTTERS 00005381 405271 9146995874 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 171.18 405715 7/7/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 234.25 405163 MN00006203 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 855.00 405372 MN00006441 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,089.25 405716 7/7/2016 121256 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING 195.00 STOP WORK ORDER FORMS 405439 48474 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 195.00 405717 7/7/2016 138688 GREAT SOUTHERN BANK 95.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405478 5309 WOODDALE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 95.00 405718 7/7/2016 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 133.10 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00001189 405408 162003 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 185.10 START UP IRRIGATION SYSTEM 405275 162144 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 226.08 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 405274 162233 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 340.68 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 405273 162238 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 884.96 405719 7/7/2016 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 10,000.00 QUARTERLY SERVICES 405612 008 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,396.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 405611 062916 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 11,396.00 405720 7/7/2016 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 1,864.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 405613 062916 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 -- Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405720 7/7/2016 100008 GRUBE, MIKE Continued.. 1,864.00 405721 7/7/2016 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 1442.78 INK AND PARTS FOR OCE 405470 325684 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1442.78 405722 7/7/2016 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 165.84 HVAC TOOLS 00001122 405276 PLY0508023 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 165.84 405723 7/7/2016 106431 HALL, MARY 250.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/19/16 405398 060616 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 405724 7/7/2016 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 16.42 BULBS 00001189 405568 161360-1 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 16.42 405725 7/7/2016 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 425.85 LATH & HUBS 00002595 405221 10398 07129.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION S129 CORNELIA DR SIDEWALK 305.64 LATH & HUBS 00002595 405221 10398 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 541.99 LATH & HUBS 00002595 405221 10398 01420.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON GOLF TERRACE B 1,273.48 405726 7/7/2016 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 4.06 GASKET 00001230 405569 F705049 5934.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 4.06 405727 7/7/2016 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 1,074.58 FEB 2016 COBRA 405571 63691777 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 12,986.28 FEB 2016 PREMIUMS 405570 63692632 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 13,281.18 JUL 2016 PREMIUMS 405572 65948076 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 1,720.12 JULY 2016 COBRA 405573 66529839 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 29,062.16 405728 7/7/2016 100799 HEDBERG SUPPLY 992.64 LANNON WALL STONE 00001223 405574 36416 1344.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 992.64 405729 7/7/2016 138702 HEDBERG, SCOTT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 -- 7/7/2016 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 15 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405729 7/7/2016 138702 HEDBERG, SCOTT Continued... 13.01 UTILLITY REFUND - FINAL 405479 5808 EWING AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 13.01 405730 7/7/2016 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 10,906.75 MAY 2016 ROOM & BOARD 405409 1000077971 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 10,906.75 405731 7/7/2016 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 1,928.30 MOBILE PEDESTAL 405312 592913 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 1,928.30 405732 7/7/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,101.00 405521 834899 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 29.00 405520 834900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 883.00 405520 834900 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 395.50 405373 834992 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 58.00 405374 834993 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,466.50 405733 7/7/2016 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 1,111.00 MURIATIC ACID 405441 160608027 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 69.86 BALL VALVES 405440 160608038 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,180.86 405734 7/7/2016 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES 1,105.65 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 405442 063016 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 38.10 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 405443 CAB FARE 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 1,143.75 405735 7/7/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 300.00 405164 40831 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 300.00 405736 7/7/2016 132376 INTEGRITY GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LLC 202.20 SERVER HD REPLACEMENT 405277 116491 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 202.20 405737 7/7/2016 125305 INTERCLEAN EQUIPMENT INC. 1,995.90 VEHICLE SENSORS 00005019 405411 18531 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.72 FOOT VALVES 00005019 405412 18545 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 - Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405737 7/7/2016 125305 INTERCLEAN EQUIPMENT INC. Continued... 722.04 NOZZLE ASSEMBLIES 00005028 405413 18562 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,797.66 405738 7/7/2016 138695 JAIN, LAKER! 31.56 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405480 6433 SHERWOOD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 31.56 405739 7/7/2016 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 65.99 405576 6/16-EQUIPT 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.42 405576 6/16-EQUIPT 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 353.62 405576 6/16-EQUIPT 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 142.57 405278 6/16-FIRE 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5.99 405314 6/16-LIQ 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 4.78 405313 6/16-POLICE 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 690.37 405740 7/7/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 15.20- 405526 2530606 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 142.54 405165 2537034 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,741.48 405166 2537035 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,150.04 405523 2537062 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 45.15 405522 2537063 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,047.90 405524 2537064 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 105.55 405525 2537070 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19,217.46 405741 7/7/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 711.43 405167 5472645 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,242.47 405168 5472649 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 447.16 405169 5472650 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 365.40 405170 5472665 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1.16 405530 5478637 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.16 405534 5478643 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,783.47 405531 5478647 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,944.19 405532 5478649 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,909.07 405533 5478655 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 225.10 405527 5478659 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 578.12 405528 5478661 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 66.82 405535 5478662 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,251.70 405529 5478663 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7f7/2016 — 7/7/2016 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 17 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405741 7/7/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,217.43 405536 5478664 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 506.38 405537 5478666 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 101.16- 405171 578754 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 17,149.90 405742 7/7/2016 138680 JOHNSON, VAUGHN 29.42 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405280 6153 ARCTIC WAY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 29.42 405743 7/7/2016 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 110.75 REFRIGERANT 00001145 405223 1050971 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 110.75 405744 7/7/2016 138684 KELLER, RICHARD 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/18/16 405397 060916 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 405745 7/7/2016 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 1,692.18 RAMP STAIR RESTORATION 405414 7971958 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,692.18 405746 7/7/2016 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 516.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 405617 062916 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 516.00 405747 7/7/2016 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC. 237.51 GRAVEL 405224 253356 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 237.51 405748 7/7/2016 138288 LAINSBURY, FRANCES 106.56 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405481 6500 JOSEPHINE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 106.56 405749 7/7/2016 138660 LAND TITLE INC. 900,000.00 GRANT AWARD TO 66 WEST APTS 405471 062916 4426.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Met Council LCA 66 West 900,000.00 405750 7/7/2016 136231 LARSON, DEB 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 405618 070116 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 — 7/7/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405750 7/7/2016 136231 LARSON, DEB Continued-. 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 405618 070116 5840.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 700.00 MARKETING CONSULTANT 405618 070116 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,100.00 405751 7/7/2016 138704 LARSON, DONALD 88.38 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405482 422 VAN BUREN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE / 88.38 405752 7/7/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 144.34 TY-RAP 00001233 405577 9304179719 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 85.01 NUTS, SCREWS 00005383 405415 9304181404 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 229.35 405753 7/7/2016 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 146,498.00 MUNICIPALITY PREMIUM 405578 53565 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 18,250.00 MUNICIPALITY PREMIUM 405579 53566 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 164,748.00 405754 7/7/2016 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 129.50 405172 4651 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 129.50 405755 7/7/2016 129955 LIGHTEN UP LLC 16,868.56 STREETLIGHTS FOR PARKLAWN 00001675 405316 02675 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 16,868.56 405756 7/7/2016 135277 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC. 403.17 REFLECTIVE SAFETY JACKETS 405225 0246393-IN 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 403.17 405757 7/7/2016 125247 LUMINAIRE ENVIRONMENTAL & TECHNOLOGIES 250.00 LEAD REMOVAL 405281 3628 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER PSTF RANGE 250.00 405758 7/7/2016 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 1,690.00 MILLING BITS 405228 12767 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1,690.00 MILLING BITS 405230 12768 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 2,208.00 MILLING BLADES 405229 12769 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 5,588.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 - Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405758 7/7/2016 405759 7/7/2016 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. Continued... 9,029.00 BLUETOOTH HEADSETS 405231 1160232 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 4,585.00 BLUETOOTH HEADSETS 00001031 405317 1160285 5923.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT COLLECTION SYSTEMS 13,614.00 405760 7/7/2016 130484 MARK'S CONCESSION REPAIR LLC 275.95 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 405631 1679 5520.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS 115.75 405632 1680 5520.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS 391.70 405761 7/7/2016 119209 MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP 622.00 INSTALL NEWALARM PANEL LINES 405633 508646 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 622.00 405762 7/7/2016 104366 MENDEL, NATHAN 64.72 UNIFORM PURCHASE 405283 062716 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 64.72 405763 7/7/2016 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 712.50 REPLACE STAND PIPE 00001178 405318 35224 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,500.00 WATERLINE REPAIR 00002589 405232 35226 01421.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 855.00 REPLACE STAND PIPE 00001179 405319 35229 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,953.75 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001180 405320 35231 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,638.75 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001181 405321 35232 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,493.75 SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT 00001187 405322 35236 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 12,153.75 405764 7/7/2016 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 294.50 CLAY SUPPLIES 00009492 405446 96259 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 294.50 405765 7/7/2016 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 12.60 CAP 00005447 405588 P10875 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.42 FITTING PLUG 00005525 405589 P11001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.84- CREDIT 405590 P11548 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.18 405766 7/7/2016 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 792.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT (2) 405448 629430-5209 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 7f7/2016 — Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405766 7/7/2016 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETYAND Continued-, 469.00 PIT CLASS - K. WATERSTREET 405447 629430-5217 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE 1,261.00 405767 7/7/2016 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 100.00 JOB POSTING 405591 8942 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 100.00 405768 7/7/2016 123909 MINNESOTA SODDING CO LLC 2,412.94 GRUB CONTROL 00001255 405351 8114 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 3,632.72 GRUB CONTROL 00001254 405352 8116 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 6,045.66 405769 7/7/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 137.00 FORESTRY FORMS 405417 20640 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 441.00 SIGN OUT FORMS 405619 20661 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 578.00 405770 7/7/2016 138171 MOBOTREX 1,500.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL VISORS 00001978 405284 212961 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 1,500.00 405771 7/7/2016 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,450.00 WEDDING AD 405620 2016-60494 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,450.00 405772 7/7/2016 100916 MUZAK LLC 291.66 IN STORE MUSIC 405233 52520997 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 291.66 IN STORE MUSIC 405233 52520997 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 291.66 IN STORE MUSIC 405233 52520997 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 874.98 405773 7/7/2016 138697 MYRE, RICK 150.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405483 5112 59TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 150.00 405774 7/7/2016 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 112.00 EDINAART CENTER AD 405449 1147911 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 112.00 405775 7/7/2016 138693 NEUMAN, PATRICK R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 -- 7/7/2016 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 21 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405775 7/7/2016 138693 NEUMAN, PATRICK Continued... 190.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405484 5837 GROVE ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 190.00 405776 7/7/2016 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 1,283.50 405375 111343 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 275.00 405376 111344 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 1,558.50 405777 7/7/2016 138705 NOTEPAGE INC. 350.00 PAGING SYSTEM E-911 UPDATE 00003057 405621 19762 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT E911 350.00 405778 7/7/2016 138701 OKINOW, HAROLD 135.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405485 4604 ANNAWAY DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 135.00 405779 7/7/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 130.91 ZIPLINE ROPE 405450 583066 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 224.93 CHAIN, CLEVIS SLIPS, LATCHES 00005424 405592 583269 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 355.84 405780 7/7/2016 101659 ORKIN 130.00 28429180 PEST CONTROL 405419 28429180-6/16 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 22.00 28438083 PEST CONTROL 405421 28438083-6/16 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 22.00 28441102 PEST CONTROL 405420 28441102-6/16 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 144.35 28464293 PEST CONTROL 405418 28464293-6/16 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 318.35 405781 7/7/2016 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC. 152.88 PAINT SPRAYER PARTS 00001200 405286 37527 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 148.33 PAINT SPRAYER PARTS 00001204 405285 37531 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 47.80 HOSE FOR PAINT SPRAYER 00001242 405593 37542 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 349.01 405782 7/7/2016 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING 44.88 CATERED FOOD 405452 0724 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 44.88 405783 7/7/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,539.62 405173 8552473-1N 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 - Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405783 7/7/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 676.70 405377 8553245-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,167.50 405378 8553248-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,383.82 405784 7/7/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 294.64 405634 47207758 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 555.20 405635 47207889 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 176.61 405454 54136581 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 495.22 405453 54136607 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 412.50 405539 55531212 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,934.17 405785 7/7/2016 135849 PETSMART #2412 66.99 K9 FOOD 00003055 405287 T-2010 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 66.99 405786 7/7/2016 122417 PETTY CASH 10.73 405288 062816 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 14.27 405288 062816 7410.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PSTF ADMINISTRATION 42.90 405288 062816 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 67.90 405787 7/7/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 178.32 405544 2001472 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 1.16 405541 2001474 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 417.02 405543 2001479 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WNE YORK SELLING 512.66 405542 2001480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE YORK SELLING 764.62 405540 2001484 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 38.41- 405176 239611 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 73.16- 405379 239858 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 95.18- 405545 239960 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 235.00 405174 2997594 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 740.36 405175 2997596 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,642.39 405788 7/7/2016 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC. 50.00 EMS FAXING 405422 116122648 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 405789 7/7/2016 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 — 7/7/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405789 7/7/2016 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. Continued... 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 405455 337171 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,223.86 405790 7/7/2016 102642 PRESTIGE FLAG 474.47 FLAGS 00006318 405622 419736 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 474.47 405791 7/7/2016 137584 PROS CONSULTING INC. 5,500.00 CONSULTING - GRANDVIEW 405423 3489 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5,500.00 405792 7/7/2016 103094 PROTECTION ONE 210.06 ALARM SERVICE 405636 12743654-6/16 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 210.06 405793 7/7/2016 101744 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS 4,401.00 PUMP REPAIR 00001011 405353 32138 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 4,401.00 405794 7/7/2016 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 72.00 405546 K-17563631 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 72.00 405795 7/7/2016 108672 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 26.25 RABIES VIRUS TEST 405289 2082685879 1450.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ANIMAL CONTROL 26.25 405796 7/7/2016 138708 ROCK, KEITH 780.00 OFFICIATING FEES 405647 063016 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 780.00 405797 7/7/2016 138703 ROMANELLI, DANIEL 162.26 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405486 5712 PARKWOOD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 162.26 405798 7/7/2016 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 4,463.11 E-82 REPAIRS 405623 0000020364 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,463.11 405799 7/7/2016 138699 SCHULSTROM, GAIL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 -- 7/7/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405799 7/7/2016 138699 SCHULSTROM, GAIL Continued... 15.63 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405487 7706 GLEASON RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 15.63 405800 7/7/2016 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 84.80 TRAINING EXPENSES 405290 062816 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.80 405801 7/7/2016 100995 SEH 3,997.08 MONOPOLE EVALUATION 405235 316928 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 3,997.08 405802 7/7/2016 138690 SEVER, MATTHEW 110.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405488 6713 NORMANDALE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 110.00 405803 7/7/2016 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 30.52 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 405291 062816 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 51.85 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 405291 062816 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 207.47 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 405291 062816 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 289.84 405804 7/7/2016 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 76.70 PAINT 00001153 405596 4863-0 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 76.70 405805 7/7/2016 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 123.08 PAINT FOR SHELTER 00001220 405292 6492-3 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 123.08 405806 7/7/2016 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 141.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004318 405236 B04645506 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 141.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004318 405236 B04645506 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 141.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004318 405236 B04645506 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 225.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004318 405236 B04645506 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 714.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004318 405236 B04645506 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 119.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004322 405237 B04700009 1263.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENVIRONMENT 200.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004322 405237 804700009 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 846.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004322 405237 B04700009 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 141.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004322 405237 B04700009 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 25.00 ACROBAT LICENSE 00004324 405238 B04734662 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 - 7/7/2016 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405806 7/7/2016 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP Continued... 141.00 ACROBAT LICENSE 00004324 405238 604734662 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 ACROBAT LICENSE 00004340 405239 B04915396 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 113.00 ACROBAT LICENSE 00004340 405239 B04915396 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004342 405240 B04975740 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 95.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004342 405240 604975740 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 190.00 ACROBAT LICENSES 00004342 405240 604975740 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 3,332.00 405807 7/7/2016 138689 SHORE, GAIL 155.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405489 6059 BLAKE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RIDGE RD 155.00 405808 7/7/2016 120784 SIGN PRO 60.00 HANGING SIGNS 405241 10574 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 60.00 HANGING SIGNS 405241 10574 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 60.00 HANGING SIGNS 405241 10574 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 180.00 405809 7/7/2016 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 533.00 SECURITY ZONE CORRECTION 405459 82622337 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 533.00 405810 7/7/2016 138696 SINCLAIR, DUNCAN 19.73 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405490 6220 LOCH MOOR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET DR 19.73 405811 7/7/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 170.62 PLASTIC, BACKPACK 405597 76204796 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 37.97 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001206 405293 76307579 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 193.69 RABBIT REPELLENT, PRUNERS 00005340 405598 76317767 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 126.46 WEED KILLER 00005341 405294 76362129 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 528.74 405812 7/7/2016 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 41.00 TOOL REPAIR 00005193 405599 ARS/12007526 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.00 405813 7/7/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No 7/7/2016 -- Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405813 7/7/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 4.40 405389 1416265 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 413.60 405178 1421763 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,405.76 405177 1421764 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 808.77 405382 1423213 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,584.56 405547 1424599 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,394.90 405387 1424601 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,285.60 405380 1424602 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 650.45 405388 1424603 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 732.80 405386 1424604 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,815.90 405383 1424605 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,103.92 405384 1424606 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 27.80 405385 1424607 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,316.40 405381 1424608 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16,544.86 405814 7/7/2016 134925 STACON 869.53 LEVEL SENSOR 00001226 405424 1N00079128 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 869.53 405815 7/7/2016 102170 STAR OF THE NORTH CONCERT BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 7/20/16 405400 060616 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 100.00 405816 7/7/2016 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 194.48 SUBSCRIPTION 405460 493121-6/16 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 194.48 405817 7/7/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 126.00 405179 11331 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 205.75 405548 11392 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 331.75 405818 7/7/2016 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 24.00 CABLES 405296 121313 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 24.00 405819 7/7/2016 136376 SUPPLYWORKS 146.67 TOWELS, SOAP SCUM REMOVER 00001151 405242 369926779 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 146.67 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 — 7/7/2016 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 27 Business Unit 405820 7/7/2016 138706 SYLVESTRE, DOROTHY Continued... 116.00 SPAM MUSEUM TRIP REFUND 405624 062816 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 116.00 405821 7/7/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 1,531.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 405461 606130521 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,096.08 CONCESSION PRODUCT 405462 606252318 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,627.23 405822 7/7/2016 121253 THAYER, LARRY 159.30 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 405297 062316 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 159.30 405823 7/7/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,923.42 405550 1103665 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 144.35 405549 1106091 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,067.77 405824 7/7/2016 138325 THREE-PEAT LLC 79.06 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405491 6340 VVILRYAN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 79.06 405825 7/7/2016 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC 210.00 405551 4506 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 210.00 405826 7/7/2016 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 98.57 WELDING SUPPLIES 00001201 405354 10140669 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 98.57 405827 7/7/2016 127543 TSI INCORPORATED 168.39 FIT TESTADAPTER 00003806 405298 90805005 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 168.39 405828 7/7/2016 138686 TUBE PRO INC. 258.00 TRIPLE TUBES 405463 00026784 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 258.00 405829 7/7/2016 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 200.00 LOUVER-W-ALUM SCREEN 00001999 405299 801900 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # 7/7/2016 — Doc No Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405829 7/7/2016 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. Continued... 200.00 405830 7/7/2016 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 322.50 SEED 00001224 405300 37866 1642.6547 SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE 322.50 405831 7/7/2016 120661 UNITED STATES TREASURY 177.94 PCORI FEES -2016 405600 2016 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 177.94 405832 7/7/2016 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 73.99 VOLLEYBALL NET 00001274 405601 1501-005075 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 73.99 405833 7/7/2016 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 3,230.23 RENTAL HYDRANT METER 00001174 405425 986685 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 3,230.23 405834 7/7/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 71.51 CUPS 405625 390879-01 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 71.51 405835 7/7/2016 133470 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 2,214.50 JULY 2016 SERVICES 405637 46200 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,214.50 405836 7/7/2016 138687 VANTIV 1,015.00 4 NEW CC PIN PADS 405464 INV426531 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,015.00 405837 7/7/2016 101064 VESSCO INC. 170.00 CHEMICAL FEED EQUIP 00001186 405301 66569 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 170.00 405838 7/7/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 19.44 LIGHTING 00001110 405602 1482557 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 240.72 WIRE RELAYS 00001133 405243 1503610 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,210.92 STREET LIGHT PARTS 00001835 405426 1521596 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,471.08 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7/7/2016 -- 7/7/2016 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Page - 29 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405839 7/7/2016 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER Continued... 142.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 405626 3081804 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 142.53 405840 7/7/2016 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 147.00 ASE TEST 405603 062916 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 147.00 405841 7/7/2016 103410 W.W. GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC. 105.00 CORD FOR DEWATERING PUMP 00001210 405302 96500 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 105.00 405842 7/7/2016 138692 WEINBERG, GERALD 57.25 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 405492 5721 LOIS LANE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 57.25 405843 7/7/2016 124942 WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING 78,360.00 HNCTY-270214 405472 404 MONROE 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 78,360.00 405844 7/7/2016 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 404.20 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 405465 063016 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 404.20 405845 7/7/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 265.16- 405395 708373 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 631.16- 405394 708510 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,208.33 405180 7087023 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,126.96 405181 7087252 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 145.16 405393 7087320 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 61.74 405558 7088101 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 965.82 405557 7088104 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 62.73 405559 7088105 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,674.42 405846 7/7/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY 50.71 51-4420190-3 405189 505968691 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 15.11 51-0010619811-5 405187 506029765 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 25.92 51-0223133-2 405198 506059570 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 17.48 51-0160483-1 405197 506059573 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 50.87 5 1-6541 084-2 405190 506153719 1646.6185 LIGHT 8, POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 7f7/2016 - Inv No 7/7/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 405846 7/7/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 150.88 51-5938955-6 405184 506171797 5937.6185 LIGHT & POWER INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 79.89 51-9770164-7 405183 506195715 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 21.71 51-0010118404-0 405185 506199900 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 113.76 51-0010166207-2 405186 506205258 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 11.83 51-0010573502-3 405192 506206938 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 54.68 51-0010619455-3 405193 506212434 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 11.62 51-0010573385-0 405191 506213885 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 15.15 51-0010777228-2 405194 506216367 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 12.54 51-0010573384-9 405188 506219097 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 31.80 51-0011004217-3 405304 506223170 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 22.59 51-0010876028-0 405196 506223914 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 19.07 51-0010876012-2 405195 506228637 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 23.50 51-9770163-6 405182 506236680 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 3,749.06 51-4159265-8 405303 506297877 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,530.99 51-5107681-4 405308 506308268 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 2,134.44 51-5547446-1 405309 506315568 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 7,629.35 51-9603061-0 405305 506363638 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 771.07 51-0010060454-7 405306 506369653 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 12,886.76 51-6644819-9 405307 506403166 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 29,909.18 51-4621797-2 405645 506635301 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 11,026.99 51-6955679-8 405644 506672725 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 33,071.21 51-4888627-1 405646 507183537 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 674.12 51-4888627-1 405646 507183537 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 104,112.28 405847 7/7/2016 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 838.49 VEHICLE REPAIRS 405310 15286 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 838.49 405848 7/7/2016 129312 YOUTH TECH INC. 2,146.25 ANIMATION, GAME DESIGN 405466 5112 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,146.25 405849 7/7/2016 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 508.00 405396 17009 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 74.00 405560 17024 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 582.00 1,773,294.28 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:45 Council Check Register by GL Page - 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 7f7/2016 — 7/7/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,773,294.28 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,665,297.24 A/P AC H Payment 107,997.04 Total Payments 1,773,294.28 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing popcils and procgdures te /7 / Ca, ...c- - .01111110. do ag - 0-407- R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 7/5/2016 14:23:56 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 7/7/2016 - 7/7/2016 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 168,306.56 02100 CDBG FUND 78,360.00 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 3,674.09 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 425.85 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,265.74 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 905,106.27 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 30,526.16 05100 ART CENTER FUND 22,612.14 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 771.07 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 7,836.38 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,051.62 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 40,741.20 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 1,403.12 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 42,846.41 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 850.00 05800 LIQUOR FUND 155,079.70 05900 UTILITY FUND 56,700.44 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 3,099.47 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 193,988.10 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,224.76 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,722.18 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 29,703.02 Report Totals 1,773,294.28 Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Fiber Expansion City Hall to Pamela Park Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the purchase of the City's portion of a fiber expansion from City Hall to Pamela Park. INTRODUCTION: The City of Edina maintains an extensive fiber network that connects its various facilities. This network provides high-speed, secure, reliable and redundant connections not only to our facilities, but also to LOGIS, which provides our connection to the County, State and internet. Because of the shared interest, LOGIS will pay half of this project cost and will have access to a quarter of the strands. This expansion to our fiber network will allow us additional redundancy to facilities in the Southdale area and will alleviate some congestion in other areas of our network. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Fiber Expansion City Hall to Pamela Park City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 July 19, 2016 Mayor and Council ☒ ☐ Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager Fiber Expansion – Edina City Hall to Pamela Park July 1, 2016 NA Parsons Corp. Castrejon Inc. Comlink Midwest (late) $68,251.00 $52,700.00 $54,992.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Castrejon Inc. $52,700.00 Information/Background: The City of Edina maintains an extensive fiber network that connects its various facilities. This network provides high-speed, secure, reliable and redundant connections not only to our facilities, but also to LOGIS, which provides our connection to the County, State and internet. Because of the shared interest, LOGIS will pay half of this project cost and will have access to a quarter of the strands. (The City of Edina and LOGIS will each pay $26,350.) The INET agreement with LOGIS will be updated after completion of this project. This expansion to our fiber network will allow us redundancy to facilities in the Southdale area and will alleviate some congestion in other areas of our network. The project would begin in August and will be completed in October. This expense will be paid for out of the Construction Fund as part of Capital Improvement Project 15- 184 and is within budget. Staff recommends the City proceed with this purchase. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Creek Valley Parking Lot Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize Staff to approve quote from Bituminous Roadways to repave Creek Valley Park Parking Lot. INTRODUCTION: See request for purchase report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Creek Valley Parking Lot City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 07/19/2016 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Request For Purchase – Creek Valley Park Parking Lot 06/10/2016 Bituminous Roadways, Inc Ace Asphalt Paving Contractors Midwest Asphalt Corporation $31,900.00 $32,437.50 $39,000.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Bituminous Roadways, Inc Information/Background: This purchase is for the repaving of the west parking lot at Creek Valley Park. The asphalt is badly broken and in need of replacement. The removal of the existing bituminous and rough grading will be completed with the use of internal Staff and equipment to help reduce the costs of this project. The Contractor will final grade and install the bituminous pavement. The costs of this project will be funded with the use of general funds and is within budget. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tim Barnes, Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Tenant Sweeper Scrubber – Public Works Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize the purchase of a M-30 Tenant Sweeper Scrubber for the 50th France District INTRODUCTION: See attached request for purchase report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Tenant Sweeper Scrubber City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 July 19, 2016 Mayor and Council ☒ ☐ Tim Barnes, City Facility Manager Request for Purchase: Tenant Sweeper Scrubber – Public Works 5/31/2016 8/31/2016 Tenant Company; Dalco Enterprises Inc. $54,000.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: $54,000.00 (State Contract # 54159) Information/Background: The 50th and France district is considered a premier shopping area. It is also home to our 3 parking ramps. The ramps and streetscapes are maintained by one individual. Of all the equipment utilized in this district the street sweeper within the ramps is heavily utilized. It was purchased in 2006 and has a useful life of 10 years. This new sweeper would replace the existing sweeper (25-483). City Staff has been enhancing the maintenance and upkeep of our ramps and sidewalks in a significant way over the past 3 years, noting that there is a need to update our sweeping machine as it generates an undesirable amount of dust. City Staff analyzed various pieces of equipment to determine what would meet our needs the best. There were 3 units, a Tenant M-30 Scrubber, a slightly smaller version of M-20 Scrubber, and the Green Machine. In January, the City Council received a staff recommendation to replace the existing sweeper with a Green Machine. Once delivered and put into service, Green Machine did not meet our expectations. At no cost, vendor found a demonstration M-30 scrubber sweeper that will provide much better cleaning characteristics in the parking ramps without producing the undesirable dust. The original price for a new Tenant M-30 is $79,152.00. For a demonstration unit (2016) with very low hours (12) it is $54,000, the price for a new Tenant M-20 is $58,607.00. The Price for the Green Machine was $54,900.00. All prices include a $9,828.32 trade in allowance on our current machine. City Staff recommends the purchase of the M-30 Sweeper Scrubber for $54,000.00 instead of the Green Machine that was approved in January of 2016. The funding for this would be split 50/50 between Parking Permit Fees and Parking Ramp Maintenance budget. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: 2016 Trackless Sidewalk Machine Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve request for purchase for the replacement of vehicle 25-475, a 2003 trackless sidewalk snow plow. INTRODUCTION: See attached request for purchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: 2016 Trackless Sidewalk Machine 2016 Trackless quote trackless 25-747 graph City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 07/19/2016 Mayor and City Council ☒ ☐ Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works 2016 trackless sidewalk machine 06/29/2016 07/29/2016 Macqueen Equipment 595 Aldine St. St. Paul MN. 55104 MN. State Contract # 107041 $100,734 Recommended Quote or Bid: Macqueen Equipment 595 Aldine St. St. Paul MN. 55104 Information/Background: This is the replacement for vehicle 25-475, a 2003 trackless sidewalk snow plow with many hours of use. The life of a commercial sidewalk plow is 10 years and 25-475 is 13 years old. The hydraulic system is getting weak and will need to rebuilt at a cost of up to $10,000. This vehicle has 3855 hours on it which is equal to 115650 miles. This is the correct time to trade in 25-475 to get the optimum valve for the old trackless snow plow. The amount of the quote above reflects a $10,000 trade in value for the replacement vehicle along with the necessary attachments to operate efficiently. Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs, and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500. The higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. This piece of equipment would be considered a light duty vehicle and has a score of 24. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Brian Olson Gunnar Kassa Shawn Anderson 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 June 27, 2016 2016 MT6 Stock Unit 1.0 MT6 Trackless Base $95,000 2.5 Hyd. Pump & Kick Out Valve $ 3,838 2.7 A/C & LED Lights $ 4,949 2.16 F-R-N Switch / Joystick $ 682 3.9 5 Position V Plow $ 6,265 TRADE-IN 2003 MT5 Serial # 2214 $-10,000 SUB. TOT. $100,734 PRICE PER MINNESOTA STATE CONTRACT: CONTRACT # 107041 RELEASE # T-652(5) FACTORY TRAINING FOR (2) EDINA MECHANICS AT TRACKLESS FACTORY INCLUDES: AIRFARE, CAR RENTAL, HOTEL, CLASS, LUNCH 1 YEAR WARRANTY DELIVERY & TRAINING INCLUDED City of Edina/Public Works 62: Snowblower - Large Equipment# 25475 Year/Make/Model 2003 / TRACKLESS / MT5T In Service Date 03/19/2003 Starting Cost $71,900.00 Service Year 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 o SL Depr Value o Total Cost o Use Miles o Use Hours o Maint Cost o Avg Maint Cost o Fuel Cost o Fuel Quantity $62,918.65 $1,380.54 0 838 $1,053.90 $697.75 $326.64 250.97 $53,937.30 $4,706.33 0 2,141 $3,419.34 $809.38 $1,286.99 766.71 $44,955.95 $7,369.06 0 2,141 $5,472.00 $1,143.26 $1,897.06 1,054.04 $35,974.61 $12,338.99 0 2,141 $9,212.67 $1,290.57 $3,126.32 1,560.99 $26,993.26 $17,314.56 0 2,141 $12,921.83 $1,486.96 $4,392.73 2,042.39 $18,011.91 $20,259.21 0 2,393 $14,928.67 $1,616.31 $5,330.54 2,515.78 $9,030.56 $24,973.00 0 2,592 $18,643.29 $1,780.14 $6,329.71 3,001.28 $49.21 $28,379.63 0 2,768 $21,231.39 $3,764.85 $7,148.24 3,358.67 $- $33,743.09 0 2,917 $25,987.58 $3,999.63 $7,755.51 3,571.73 $- $36,957.25 0 3,160 $27,752.53 $4,148.90 $9,204.72 4,021.79 $- $40,059.41 0 3,423 $29,293.98 $4,357.14 $10,765.43 4,506.49 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 SL Depreciated Value Maint Cost Avg Maint Cost Fuel Quantity SL Depreciated Value and Cumulative Operation Costs Unit No 10 6/30/2016 10:02:09AM Page 1 of 1 Service Year 2015 2016 $- $41,757.11 0 3,501 $30,514.02 $4,515.04 $11,243.09 4,654.83 $- $43,583.12 0 3,548 $32,197.53 $4,696.25 $11,385.59 4,699.09 Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tim Barnes, City Facility Manager Item Activity: Subject:First Amendment To Comfort Station Exclusive License - Garden Park Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of new Lease Agreement with Comcast at Garden Park. INTRODUCTION: Please see attached documents. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Comcast Original lease Comcast Lease Renewal First Ammendment July 19, 2016 Mayor and Council Brian E. Olson, Public Works Director First Amendment To Comfort Station Exclusive License - Garden Park Information / Background: The City entered into a lease agreement with Comcast on July 6, 1998 at 5520 Hansen Rd. (Garden Park) The original agreement enabled the City to build a comfort station, providing restroom facilities at Garden Park. The building that was constructed also houses communication equipment for Comcast. The original terms of the agreement allowed them to locate in the comfort station for an initial term of 15 years for a cost of $100,000. It also allowed them to renew their lease for a period of 4 terms of 3 years (total of 12 additional years). They exercised this right for calendar years 2012-2015 for a cost of $22,000 per term as per the initial agreement. Comcast has requested extending the overall length of the contract. John Kelly of Campbell Knutson Law Firm has worked with City Staff and Comcast in review and oversight of the agreement terms and conditions. The new terms include a $3,500.00 dollar increase in License Fees per term and the agreement could be extended for 6 additional terms of 3 years each. In exchange for the additional length, each new renewal will require $25,500.00 per three year period. City Staff recommends acceptance of this first amendment and lease renewal of the Comcast lease. FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMFORT STATION EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMFORT STATION EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT ("First Amendment") effective as of the 31st day of December, 2015, by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Licensor") and Comcast of Arkansas/Florida/Louisiana/Minnesota/Mississippi/Tennessee, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Licensee"), successor-in-interest to KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("Original Licensee"). WHEREAS, Licensor and the Original Licensee entered into an agreement dated July 6, 1998 entitled Comfort Station Exclusive License Agreement ("License Agreement"), wherein Licensor licensed to the Original Licensee the "Premises" as described in the Agreement, located on the Real Property at 5520 Hansen Road, Edina, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Original Licensee assigned its interest to Licensee with the Licensor's consent; and WHEREAS, Licensee extended the Expiration Date of the License Agreement to December 31, 2015 pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Licensor and Licensee desire to amend and modify the terms, covenants and conditions of the License Agreement as of December 31, 2015 pursuant to this First Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 185293v2 1 1. License Agreement. All of the terms, covenants and conditions of the License Agreement remain in full force and effect except as modified and amended by this First Amendment. 2. Amendment of License Agreement. The License Agreement is hereby modified and amended and is effective from and after the 31' day of December, 2015, as follows: A. Paragraph 3 — "Term of the Agreement" is amended to by deleting the current Paragraph 3 in its entirety and inserting the following: 3. Term. Licensee licenses the Premises from Licensor, upon the terms and conditions herein contained, to have and to hold the same for the term (the "Term"), commencing at 12:00 a.m., midnight to July 1, 1998 or such earlier date which is mutually acceptable to both parties (the "Commencement Date"), and expiring, subject to the provisions set forth below, at 12:00 a.m., midnight on December 31, 2012 (the "Expiration Date"). Licensee shall have the right to extend the Term of the License Agreement after December 31, 2015 for six (6) additional three (3) year terms (each such term hereinafter referred to as a "Renewal Term") subject to the terms of the License Agreement, as amended by this First Amendment, upon the payment of a License Fee for the applicable Renewal Term of Twenty-five Thousand Five Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($25,500.00) ("Renewal License Fee"), which Renewal License Fee shall be due and payable by the Licensee on or before January 1st of the applicable Renewal Term, with the payment of the Renewal License Fee for the first Renewal Term due and payable by Licensee within thirty (30) days of the execution of this First Amendment by the Licensor. Licensee shall exercise its right to renew the License Agreement for each applicable Renewal Term by notifying Licensor, in writing, one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the expiration date of the then current Renewal Term or such extended Term, as applicable. B. Paragraph 12 — "Insurance" is amended and restated by deleting the current language in the License Agreement and inserting in place thereof the language contained in Exhibit A attached hereto. C. Paragraph 17 — "Notices" is amended to by deleting the current Paragraph 17 in its entirety and inserting the following: 17. Notices. All bills, statements, notices or communications which Licensor or Licensee may desire or be required to give to the other party shall be deemed sufficiently given or rendered if in writing and either delivered to the 185293v2 2 other party personally or sent by registered or certified mail or by a nationally recognized overnight courier service to the other party to the applicable address or addresses set forth below, and the time of rendition thereof or the giving of such notice or communication shall be deemed to be the time when the same is delivered to the other party personally, when deposited in the mail or when delivered by the nationally recognized overnight courier service, as herein provided. To Licensee: Comcast of Arkansas/Florida/Louisiana/ Minnesota/Mississippi/Tennessee, Inc. 10 River Park Plaza St. Paul, MN 55107 Attn: Real Estate Manager With a copy to: Comcast Cable Communications, LLC One Comcast Center 1701 John F. Kennedy Boulevard Philadelphia, PA 19103-2838 Attn: General Counsel To Licensor: City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Attn: Facilities Manager 3. Amendment. This First Amendment supersedes all prior discussions and negotiations and contains all agreements and understandings between the Licensor and Licensee. The License Agreement and this First Amendment may only be amended in writing signed by all parties. 4. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be signed in counterparts by the parties hereto each of which counterpart shall be considered an original. 5. Governing Law. The License Agreement and this First Amendment shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 6. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated in this First Amendment as though they were set forth in the body hereof. 185293v2 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. LICENSOR: CITY OF EDINA BY: James Hovland, Mayor AND Scott Neal, City Manager LICENSEE: COMCAST OF ARKANSAS/ FLORIDA/LOUISIANA/MINNESOTA/ MISSISSIPPI/TENNESSEE, INC. BY: Its: 185293v2 4 EXHIBIT A TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO COMFORT STATION EXCLUSIVE LICENSE AGREEMENT 12. Insurance. A. Licensee's Obligations: 1. Liability Insurance. At all times during the Term, Licensee shall maintain at its own expense a policy of commercial general liability insurance, including contractual liability covering its obligations under this Agreement, with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 per occurrence and not less than $2,000,000 annual aggregate. In addition to Licensee, the policy shall also name Licensor, its elected officials and employees, as additional insureds. 2. Workers' Compensation. In addition to the policies referred to above, Licensee shall maintain at all times during the Term, workers' compensation insurance coverage to the full extent required by applicable law and said policies shall also contain a "waiver of subrogation" clause that protects Licensor, its elected officials and employees against any claims made by Licensee's employees. 3. Property Insurance. At all times during the Term, Licensee shall maintain at its own expense a policy of "causes of loss-special form" insurance covering the fixtures and other personal property owned or installed in the Building. B. Licensor's Obligations: 1. Property Insurance. At all times during the Term, Licensor shall maintain at its own expense a policy of "all risk" insurance covering the Building, fixtures and other personal property owned or installed in the Building. 2. Liability Insurance. At all times during the Term, Licensor shall maintain, at its own expense, a policy of commercial general liability insurance providing coverage for the common areas and ways in the Building and the land on which the Building is located. Notwithstanding any other term, covenant or condition of this Lease, the Licensor's liability under this Agreement for any claim of any type or 185293v2 5 nature or any cause of action against Licensor, by the Licensee, its employees and/or agents, or any other person or party, is limited to the liability limits set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466' but only for as long as the Real Property is owned by a municipality. All polices of insurance purchased by Licensee in compliance with the above provisions shall be purchased from an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of Minnesota, with an A.M. Best rating of not less than A-V1I. Licensor acknowledges that Licensee currently insures all or a portion of its property assets through the use of an unrated wholly-owned insurance subsidiary (captive insurer) domiciled in New York named Three Belmont Insurance Company, and that the Licensee shall have the right to continue insuring its property assets through such arrangement or another similar arrangement in lieu of procuring insurance as otherwise required hereunder. At least ten (10) days before the Commencement Date and annually at each policy renewal thereafter, each party shall provide the other with a certificate of insurance as evidence of the above insurance which shall provide that the insurer will give notice of cancellation in accordance with policy provisions. Licensee shall not conduct any activities in or about the Premises which will in any way impair or invalidate the insurer's obligations under any policy of insurance contemplated hereunder or maintained by Licensor with respect to the Building. In the event any increases in premiums for Licensor's insurance on the Building are due solely to increased risk resulting from Licensee's use of the Premises, Licensee shall pay to Licensor within thirty (30) days after written notice and opportunity to review such policy (however, in no event shall such review period exceed thirty (30) days after the date of such written notice), as Additional Fees, the amount of such increase, whether or not Licensor has consented to Licensee's use. 185293v2 6 Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2016-68: Vernon Avenue Sidewalk from Gleason Road to Blake Road Cooperative Agreement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution No. 2016-68 authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign the attached cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for the Vernon Avenue Sidewalk (Gleason Road and Blake Road). INTRODUCTION: Please recall that on October 1, 2013 Council approved Resolution 2013-86 supporting the application for Hennepin County 2014 Sidewalk cost participation for this project. This is the third and final project associated with this Resolution. The funding application for this section of Vernon Avenue was denied in 2014, however, the City reapplied in 2016 and was awarded funding. The County will contribute 25% or up to a maximum contribution of $100,000 for the sidewalk project.This project will be constructed in 2016. This cooperative agreement is needed to detail the responsibilities of each party in regards to this project. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution 2016-68 Vernon Avenue Sidewalk Hennepin County Cooperative Agreement Vernon Ave SIdewalk RESOLUTION NO. 2016-68 APPROVING CITY OF EDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY VERNON AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina and Hennepin County approved sidewalk improvements along the north side of County State Aid Highway No (CSAH) 158 (Vernon Avenue) from Gleason Road to Blake Road in 2016; and WHEREAS, the City or its agent shall be responsible for administering construction of the sidewalk and have adequate personnel available to perform the construction staking, testing, inspection and development of as-built plans required on the project; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Mayor James B. Hovland and City Manager Scott H. Neal, are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into a construction cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for Vernon Avenue Sidewalk Improvements, a copy of which said agreement was before the City Council and which is made a part hereof by reference. Dated: July 19, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 19, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Agreement No. PW 40-11-16 County Project No. 1632 County State Aid Highway No. 158 City of Edina County of Hennepin COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 20 by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of Edina, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City is proposing to construct a new sidewalk along County State Aid Highway No. (CSAH) 158 (Vernon Avenue) from Gleason Road to Blake Road, as shown on the plans the City Project Number (County Project Number 1632), hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, the above described Project lies within the corporate limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City or its agents shall be responsible to develop the plans and specifications for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has requested that the County approve said plans and specifications, and the County has indicated its willingness to approve said plans and specifications; and WHEREAS, the City or its agents shall be responsible for administering construction of the Project and has adequate personnel available to perform the construction staking, testing, inspection and development of as-built plans required on the Project; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared an estimate to construct the sidewalk in the amount of Two Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Five Dollars and No Cents ($265,355.00); and WHEREAS, the Project is eligible for participation under Hennepin County's sidewalk cost participation policy; and WHEREAS, the County will participate in its share of the costs to construct the sidewalk along CSAH 158 as set forth herein; and 1 Agreement No. PW 40-1 1-1 6 CSAH 158: C.P. 1632 WHEREAS, it is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1 and Section 471.59. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: The City or its agents shall prepare the necessary plans, specifications, and proposal; obtain approval of said plans and specifications from the County; advertise for bids for the work and construction; receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement; enter into a contract with the successful bidder at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder; administer the contract; and, perform the required engineering and inspection; all in accordance with said plans and specifications. The contract shall include the plans and specifications prepared by the City or its agents and approved by the County. Said plans and specifications shall conform to Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) Design Standards applicable to County State Aid Highways and to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Attached is a copy of the MnDOT ADA Compliance Checklist (Curb Ramp) form. The City or its agents shall complete said form for each curb ramp constructed as part of the Project and return to the County. The City understands and agrees that payment will not be made by the County until all required ADA certification forms have been received and verified by the County. II Prior to beginning construction, the City shall furnish the County with two (2) complete sets of County approved plans and specifications for said Project. Upon completion of the Project, the City or its agents shall furnish the County with a complete set of as-built plans certified as to their accuracy by the City's Project Engineer. Said as-designed plans, specifications and as-built plans for the Project shall be furnished by the City at no cost to the County. III The City or its agents shall administer the construction contract and perform all required engineering, inspection and testing. All construction and materials sampling and testing for the Project shall be accomplished in accordance with all applicable standards and requirements of the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT) State Aid for Local Transportation Division in effect at the time of Contract award. Agreement No. PW 40-11-16 CSAH 158: C.P. 1632 The City shall also obtain, and comply with, any and all permits and approvals required from other governmental or regulatory agencies to accomplish the Project. Said permits and approvals shall be obtained prior to the start of any construction and made available to the County upon request. It is understood and agreed by the City that construction of the Project shall be completed to the satisfaction of the County within three years of the date this agreement has been signed by the parties hereto. IV The construction of this Project shall be under the supervision and direction of the City Engineer or designated representative. All work for the Project shall be completed in compliance with the County approved plans and specifications. The County Highway Engineer and representative staff shall have the right, as the work progresses, to enter upon the premises to make any inspections deemed necessary and shall cooperate with the City Engineer and staff at their request to the extent necessary. The County agrees that the City may make changes in the above referenced approved plans or in the character of said contract construction which are reasonably necessary to cause said construction to be in all things performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. It is further agreed by the County that the City may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements with the City's contractor for the performance of any additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, within the original scope of the Project. The City shall obtain the approval of the County Highway Engineer or designated representative on said change orders or supplemental agreements. The County will respond to the City's request for approvals within seven (7) calendar days. V The City or its agents shall acquire all additional right of way, permits and/or easements required for the construction of said Project, at no cost to the County. Upon completion of this Project, all permanent right of way acquired for CSAH 158 as provided herein shall be conveyed to the County by the City with no consideration required. VI The County will participate in the construction costs for the sidewalk as provided herein. The County's cost participation share in the construction costs shall be twenty five (25) percent. The City understands and agrees that the County's total cost participation for the Project shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($100,000.00) without an amendment to this Agreement. 3 VA- Agreement No. PW 40-11-16 CSAH 158: C.P. 1632 Upon completion of the Project the City shall notify the County and submit an invoice for one hundred percent (100%) of the County's share of the costs for the Project. Upon approval of the completed Project by the County Engineer or designated representative, the County shall reimburse the City for its share of the costs for the Project. The City shall submit invoices to Mr. Robert Byers, Senior Professional Engineer or his successor at the Hennepin County Transportation Department, 1600 Prairie Drive, Medina, MN, 55340-5421. The County will within forty five (45) days of said invoice, deposit with the City funds totaling the amount of said invoice. VIII It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that upon completion of the Project, the sidewalk and pedestrian ramps included in the Project shall become the property of the City and all maintenance, restoration or repair required thereafter shall be performed by the City at no expense to the County. IX All records kept by the City and the County with respect to the Project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto. X Each party agrees that it will be responsible for its own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by the law, and shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof The County's and the City's liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The County and the City each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self-insurance program. XI The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees, from any liabilities, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including, reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable for related to the ownership, maintenance, existence, restoration, repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of the Project. The City's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. Agreement No. PW 40-11-16 CSAH 158: C.P. 1632 The County agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the County, its contractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable related to the ownership, maintenance, existence, restoration, repair or replacement of the improvements constructed as part of the Project. The County's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. XII The City also agrees that any contract let by the City or its agents for the performance of the work on County State Aid Highway No. 158 as provided herein shall include clauses that will: 1) Require the Contractor to defend, indemnify, and hold the County, its officials, officers, agents and employees harmless from any liability, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees, arising out of or by reason of the acts and/or omissions of the said Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors; 2) Require the Contractor to be an independent contractor for the purposes of completing the work provided for in this Agreement; and 3) Require the Contractor to provide and maintain insurance in accordance with the following: 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contractual Liability and Explosion, Collapse and Underground Property Damage (XCU) Liability coverages: Limits General Aggregate $2,000,000 Products--Completed Operations Aggregate $2,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury $1,500,000 Each Occurrence - Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage $1,500,000 Hennepin County shall be named as an additional insured for the Commercial General Liability coverage with respect to operations covered under this Agreement. 2. Automobile Liability: Combined Single limit each occurrence coverage or the equivalent covering owned, non-owned, and hired automobiles: 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: $1,500,000 5 Agreement No. PW 40-11-16 CSAH 158: C.P. 1632 A. Workers' Compensation Statutory If the Contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverages must apply to Minnesota laws. B. Employer's Liability - Bodily injury by: Accident - Each Accident $500,000 Disease - Policy Limit $500,000 Disease - Each Employee $500,000 4. Professional Liability — Per Claim $1,500,000 Aggregate $2,000,000 It understood and agreed by the parties hereto that the above listed Professional Liability insurance will not be required in any construction contract let by City if the City's Contractor is not required to perform design engineering as part of said construction contract. An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above subparagraphs establish minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the City's Contractor to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with said Project. All insurance policies shall be open to inspection by the County and copies of policies shall be submitted to the County upon written request. XIII It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by the City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County. Also, any and all employees of the County and all other persons engaged by the County in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under 6 Agreement No. PW 40-11-16 CSAH 158: C.P. 1632 the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City. MV In order to coordinate the services of the County with the activities of the City so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the Hennepin County Highway Engineer or designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the County and serve as liaison between the County and the City. In order to coordinate the services of the City with the activities of the County so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, the City Engineer or designated representative shall manage this Agreement on behalf of the City and serve as liaison between the City and the County. XV It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. XVI The whereas clauses are incorporated herein and are hereby made a part of this Agreement. XVII The provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. (this space left intentionally blank) -7 Agreement No. PW 40-11-16 CSAH 158: C.P. 1632 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA (Seal) By: Mayor Date: And: Manager Date: 8 \Al\....._ Agreement No. PW 40-11-16 CSAH 158: C.P. 1632 COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST: By: By: Deputy/Clerk of the County Board Chair of its County Board Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: And: County Administrator By: &I- el --/-2 k - -2) Assi it County Attorney Date: W3e1/67 APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: Date: And: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: By: Assistant County Attorney County Highway Engineer Date: Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: Department Director, Transportation (Road & Bridges) - Operations Date: 9 (TH) (SS) (SS) (TH) In Initial TH TH (5) Ramp's running slope (%): (6) Ramp's cross slope (%): Secondary Secondary TH P_JSSL JSS Initial Secondary TH SS SS Initial Secondary Mn DOT ADA Compliance Checklist (Curb Ramp) District: Quadrant: Const. Year: SP: City: Compile all relevant document (photos, notes, etc) of the completed quadrant and send to JAMIE.HENDRICKSONQHENNEPIN.US (1) Minimum 4' wide pedestrian access route (PAR) maintained? 0 Yes 0 No Intersection: Ramp Type: 0 Yes 0 No (2) Landing meets min. 4'x4' and perpendicular grade break(s)? (3) Are landing(s) located at the top of each ramp and at change(s) in direction and at inverse grades? (4) Landing slopes (%): 0 Yes 0 No (7) Gutter flow line slope (%): (8) Gutter inslope (%): (9) Roadway cross slope (%): TH i SS TH I SS TH Iss TH Trunk Highway SS.7... Side Street (10) Do truncated domes cover the entire curb opening and are they properly oriented? (11) Are gutter line and ramps draining properly? 0 Yes (12) Are there any vertical discontinuities greater than 1/4"? 0 Yes (13) Do ramps comply with Spec 25213? 0 Yes (14) Are ramps fully compliant? ()Yes 0 No If NO, check the reason(s) below. Explain why the ramp didn't meet compliance and how the ramp has been improved from the pre-construction condition (see ADA Compliance Checklist Guidance for more info and attach pages if needed). aTopography IStructure(s) fl Utilities OContractor fl MnDOT (15) Was the curb ramp able to be built according to the plan details? 0 Yes 0 No If NO, please explain: Printed Name: Date (mm/dd/yyyy): (AI certify that the information entered on this form is accurate to the best of my knowledge and that I fully understand the checklist standards and am ualified to can out the ins ection. 0 Yes 0 No 0 No ONO 0 No Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Contract No. ENG 16-14 Wooddale Avenue Bridge Improvements Over Minnehaha Creek Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for the Wooddale Avenue Bridge Improvements Over Minnehaha Creek. INTRODUCTION: See attached detailed Request for Purchase Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: ENG 16-14 Wooddale Ave Bridge Improvements City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 July 19, 2016 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Request for Purchase - Award Bid – Contract No. ENG 16-14 Wooddale Avenue Bridge Improvements Over Minnehaha Creek July 7, 2016 Sept. 7, 2016 Blackstone Contractors, LLC G.Urban Companies, Inc. G.F. Jedlicki, Inc. Standard Contracting L.S. Black constructors, Inc. Park Construction Co. Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. $58,410.00 $88,175.00 $88,885.00 $93,044.45 $153,552.50 $153,964.00 $154,816.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Blackstone Contractors, LLC $58,410.00 Information/Background: Minnehaha Creek experienced flooding in 2014 causing scour and erosion damage to the Wooddale Avenue Bridge. Due to the historic significance to this bridge, special rehabilitation techniques were designed and planned for the repairs. This project, along with the Valley View Road Pedestrian Bridge project, was bid in April 2016 and rejected due to costs over the budget. This project was re-scoped and re-bid leaving only the basic erosion and scour repair items expecting to correct those problems now and repair the more aesthetic items in the future when the railings require repair. The engineers estimated costs for the Wooddale Avenue Bridge was $154,306.45. The areas of cost savings between the estimate and the low bid were mobilization and the temporary stream diversion. Funding for this project was approved under CIP No. 15-097 Bridge Repairs. Staff recommends awarding the project to Blackstone Contractors, LLC. It is anticipated that this work would occur in August and September. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of June 1, 2016 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Report of June 1, 2016. INTRODUCTION: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the June 1, 2016 Traffic Safety Report at their June 16 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of June 1, 2016 Draft Minutes ETC, June 16, 2016 Map : Morningside Road and Alden Drive July 19, 2016 Mayor and City Council Joe Totten, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of June 01, 2016 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on June 01. The City Engineer, Assistant City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, Transportation Planner, Public Works Director, and Police Lieutenant were in attendance for this meeting. For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included on the June 16 Edina Transportation Commission and the July 19 City Council meeting agendas. Section A : Items on which the Traffic Safety Commission recommends approval A1. Request for a new stop sign for southbound traffic at Alden Dr and Mornignside Rd Existing Conditions and Concerns: • Residents of in the area requested a southbound stop sign on Alden Drive, due to limited sight distances, and being in an otherwise controlled area. • Alden Drive and Morningside Road had a camera study performed, with one day having 1,600 movements at the intersection . • Alden Drive has an ADT of 260 and an 85th- percentile speed of 25.8 mph. • Morningside Road has an ADT of 1,350 and an 85th-percentile speed of 29.3 mph. • The intersection is a T-intersection, with Alden Drive having only a southbound approach. • Alden Drive is only one block long, its other intersection with 42nd Street, is 1250 feet away, and is all-way stop controlled. Traffic Safety Preview of Jun 01, 2016 Page 2 Photo : 55th Street, looking east towards Oaklawn Avenue Map : 55th Street and Kellogg Avenue/Oaklawn Avenue, Kellogg Avenue is the westernmost circled intersection. Wooddale Avenue is seen on the far west of this map Photo : Alden Drive, looking south towards Morningside Road • Morningside Road has three intersections east of Grimes Avenue and west of France Avenue, one other intersection is uncontrolled, the other is controlled. Guidance: • Full warrants for stop sign placement can be seen in Appendix A. After review, staff recommends placement of a stop sign at this intersection for southbound Alden Drive, and a stop sign to be placed on Eton Place, northbound at Morningside Road. The reasons for this decision are as follows; • The sight distance for Alden Drive’s approach is very limited, and left turns from Alden Drive are not seen as being safe unless they come to a full stop. • The streets which intersect Morningside Road east of Grimes Avenue are all controlled on their other end, and one of the three (Scott Terrace) is already controlled on at Morningside Road. • Speeds and volumes on Morningside Road clearly indicate that Morningside Road is the major (or through) street. • To make the City of Edina’s signage consistent with how the road network is being used, and to make the system consistent throughout the city. Section B : Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Request for intersection controls at 55th Street and Oaklawn Avenue Existing Conditions and Concerns: • Neighbors are concerned that the lack of any traffic control at this intersection creates a hazard for vehicles, bicyclist and pedestrians using the intersection, and also for use of their front yards and areas near the roadway. • The intersection is currently uncontrolled. • A right angle crash at the intersection occurred in 2010, resulting in a non-incapacitating injury. No other contributing factors were listed. The vehicles’ directions were northbound and eastbound. • A right angle crash at the intersection occurred in 2015, and resulted in injury. The vehicles’ directions were southbound and westbound. • 55th Street is yield controlled at its intersection with Brookview Avenue, 300 feet to the east, and is uncontrolled at Kellogg Avenue 300 feet to the west. • Oaklawn Avenue is stop controlled at its intersection with 54th street 650 feet to the north, and at 56th Street, 625 feet to the south. • Oaklawn Avenue has an ADT of 155 and an 85th-percentile speed of 25.0 mph. 3.3% of drivers exceeded 30 mph on Oaklawn Avenue during the study. Traffic Safety Preview of Jun 01, 2016 Page 3 Photo : 55th Street, looking west towards Kellogg Avenue Photo : 62nd Street, looking west towards Wyman Avenue • 55th Street has an ADT of 156 and an 85th-percentile speed of 25.9 mph east of the intersection. 2.6% of drivers exceeded 30 mph on 55th Street during the study. • While placing the tube counting equipment, a neighbor bemoaned the possible placement of a stop sign, describing further signage as a hardship. Guidance: • Possible mitigation for the crash type seen in 2010 and 2015 would be stop or yield controls. • Full warrants for stop sign placement can be seen in Appendix A. After review, staff recommends no action on this item for the following reasons; • The crash history of the intersection is marginal, and does not indicate, independently, that a safety issue is present • Sightlines, while less than optimal, are not atypical in the City of Edina • Speeds indicate that drivers are proceeding with due caution and not driving recklessly • Nearby intersections are uncontrolled B2. Request for intersection controls at 55th and Kellogg Existing Conditions and Concerns: • Neighbors are concerned that the lack of any traffic control at this intersection creates a hazard for vehicles, bicyclist and pedestrians using the intersection, and also for use of their front yards and areas near the roadway. • The intersection is currently uncontrolled. • 55th Street is uncontrolled at its intersection with Oaklawn Avenue, 300 feet to the east, and is stop controlled at its intersection with Wooddale Avenue 300 feet to the west. • Kellogg Avenue is stop controlled at its intersection with 54th street 650 feet to the north, and at 56th Street, 625 feet to the south. • Kellogg Avenue has an ADT of 150 and an 85th-percentile speed of 24.9 mph. 2.7% of drivers exceeded 30 mph on Kellogg Avenue during the study. • 55th Street has an ADT of 359 and an 85th-percentile speed of 25.5 mph west of the intersection. 1.4% of drivers exceeded 30 mph on 55th Street during the study. • A crash in 2015 was a right angle crash, in which an eastbound and a northbound collided in a right- angle crash. Both drivers stated they did not observe the other vehicle. Guidance: • Full warrants for stop sign placement can be seen in Appendix A. After review, staff recommends no action on this item for the following reasons; • The crash history of the intersection is marginal, and does not indicate, independently, that a safety issue is present • Sightlines, while less than optimal, are not atypical in the City of Edina • Speeds indicate that drivers are proceeding with due caution and not driving recklessly • Nearby intersections are uncontrolled B3. Request for Stop Controls at the intersection of Wyman Avenue and 62nd Street Existing Conditions and Concerns: Traffic Safety Preview of Jun 01, 2016 Page 4 Photo : Valley View Road, looking west away from Gleason Road Map : 62nd Street and Wyman Avenue • This request comes from a resident who feels that this intersection is unsafe with the amount of traffic and speed of traffic that approaches the intersection. • This is a T-intersection with Wyman Road having only a northbound approach. • Wyman Avenue has a volume of 460 ADT; with a midblock 85th-percentile speed of 23.5 mph. • 62nd Street has a volume of 340 ADT; with a midblock 85th-percentile speed of 26.2 mph. • In the opinion of staff, construction traffic is not believed to be a factor in these roadway volumes, as 62nd Street is one block north of the local connector, Maddox Lane. • No crashes have been reported at this intersection in the past 10 years. Guidance: • Full warrants for stop sign placement can be seen in Appendix A. After review, staff recommends no action for this item, for the following reasons: • There is not a crash history, and the intersection seems to be functioning well • The speeds of the approaches indicate that drivers are utilizing due care while proceeding • Sightlines are very good in one direction and relatively poor in another, however the poor sightlines are appropriate for the low speed traffic observed in the studies • Other nearby intersections are uncontrolled B4. Request for more Speed Limit Signs along Valley View Road, from Gleason Road to Braemar Boulevard Existing Conditions and Concerns: • A request was received for a speed study and “strict enforcement” of speed limits along Valley View Road, specifically west of Gleason Road, for westbound traffic, which is coming down the hill in this location. Traffic Safety Preview of Jun 01, 2016 Page 5 • A count taken in this location showed an 85th percentile speed of 35.2 mph and an ADT of 1991. • A full speed study was reported to the Police Department for targeted enforcement. • When contacted for the results of the study, the requestor wanted more to be done to discourage speeding in the area, including more speed limit signage. • Other requests from the requestor included signage that said “Speed Limit Strictly Enforced” or other signage to give the impression that enforcement in the area was stronger than had been observed by the requestor. • The requestor feels that the rural ambiance of Valley View Road from Gleason Road to Braemar Boulevard is a reason for reminding drivers of the 30 mph speed limit. • Two (2) crashes in the last ten years cited speed as a contributing factor from Braemar Boulevard to Gleason Road. Guidance • Posted speed limits are not an effective means of reducing speeds, without a similar reduction in design speeds. After review, staff recommends no action on this item for the following reasons; • Enforcement would be present regardless of this decision; this item has been forwarded to the police for enforcement at their discretion • Further signage alone is not seen as an effective means of changing driver behavior • Signage such as “Speed Limits Strictly Enforced” are not found in the MNMUTCD and may imply that other speed limits are not enforced Section D: Other items handled by Traffic Safety D1. Various construction related calls were received, the following are examples of the requests - On Jeff Place, neighbors were concerned with speeds and volumes using their street to access Tracy Avenue north of Benton Avenue. A count was taken of this location and no pattern of speeding was seen. There was a volume of 410 ADT with an 85th-percentile speed of 29.0 mph. Police is aware of concerns in the area and has used the Dynamic Speed Sign Trailer in the area to reduce driver speeds. - A resident was unable to exit from US 212 to Gleason Road, and was upset that the detour for the Tracy Avenue project used Gleason Road. How to exit to Gleason Road from eastbound US 212 was explained. - A call was forwarded to the Three Rivers Park District about the detour signage for the Nine-Mile Creek Regional Trail being in the bike lanes on 70th Street. - A call was received concerned about future congestion at Interlachen Boulevard and Blake Road due to the upcoming construction on US 169. This will be an item investigated when US 169 is under construction. - Closures on 69th Street were seen as concerns for neighbors on Brook Drive and McGuire Road with not allowing high school traffic access to Antrim Road. The signs in place the next day clearly stated “No Access to Antrim Road”. - A count on the Hansen Road detour for Tracy Avenue showed a volume of 3991 ADT and an 85th- percentile speed of 30.1 mph. Nearby counts from past years showed a volume of around 1400 ADT and speeds from 30-32 mph, from 2003-2013. This data was forwarded to the police department. - Further concerns on Hansen Road were expressed by residents. A radar study showed speeds approaching 35 mph were common on northbound Hansen as it approaches Birchcrest Park. D2. A resident wanted the planned bike lanes on Benton Avenue marked this year. Previous measurements of Benton Avenue showed that the road is currently too narrow to mark bike lanes and maintain two lanes of traffic and one lane of parking. Traffic Safety Preview of Jun 01, 2016 Page 6 D3. A use of the dynamic speed sign trailer aggravated a resident on Valley View Road who noted that the trailer should have been placed a block further east, as the speed limit is not always 30 mph in the school zone near the Edina High School. D4. A requestor asked for adjustments to the traffic light layouts on France Avenue, southbound, at Minnesota Drive due to a large amount of Red Light Running at this intersection. This request was forwarded to the Police Department and Hennepin County, as France Avenue is a County road. D5. A requestor asked for a left turn phase for eastbound Vernon Avenue at Interlachen Boulevard. The requestor was referred to Hennepin County which controls the signal. D6. A resident noted that a stop sign at 64th Street and Warren Avenue was obstructed by vegetation and wanted the sign lowered beneath the braches of a nearby tree. The sign was an appropriate distance from the ground and the road’s grade. This item was then forwarded to the City Forester to ensure that the tree obstructing the sign is trimmed back. D7. A resident noted that the stop sign for westbound Dewey Hill Road was obscured by hedges. The sign was placed in an appropriate position. The Traffic Safety Coordinator worked with the City Forester to address the issue. D8. A resident asked for a disabled child area sign for their child to be placed on Alden Drive. Information for future concerns was recorded and the address and signage was forwarded to the Traffic Safety Specialist. D9. A resident requested data for Blake Road, north of Interlachen Boulevard, and use of the dynamic speed sign trailer. The data were provided and the request for the signage forwarded to the Police Department. D10. A request was fielded for slowing traffic on West Shore Drive, north of 66th Street, and near the Edina Art Center. A count in this location found a volume of 231 ADT and an 85th-percentile speed of 31.8 mph. A detailed speed report of this area was forwarded to the Edina Police Department. D11. Several residents near Todd Park called in with concerns over speeds on Division Street and noted that the crosswalk across Division Street, on Rutledge Avenue, to be added this summer (and considered in the Traffic Safety Report of January 06, 2016) would be ineffective if the high speeds were not addressed. Two counters were placed in this location and found much higher volumes than had previously been observed on Division Street, with an approximate volume of 1425 ADT and 85th-percentile speeds of 32.0 mph between Parkside Lane and Rutledge Avenue. Detailed speed reports were sent to the Edina Police Department for targeted enforcement, and counts will be retaken after the crosswalk is added for comparison. Traffic Safety Preview of Jun 01, 2016 Page 7 Appendix A: Stop Sign Warrants When it is determined that a full stop is always required on an approach to an intersection a STOP (R1-1) sign shall be used. At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs. The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction with the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users from the minor street failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. Additional warrants which do not specify the type of control are as follows; A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C. An un-signalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more the 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and/or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Additional warrants from the city of Edina list that: 1. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 2. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. 3. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. 4. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 5. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 6. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 1 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Room June 16, 6:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair LaForce called the meeting to order. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Brown, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Miranda, and Olson. Absent at roll call were members Ding, Loeffelholz and Ruehl. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by chair LaForce to change the order of presentation for some items under Reports/Recommendations and the motion was seconded by member Janovy. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Boettge approving the revised meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by member Olson and seconded by member Miranda approving the edited May 19, 2016, minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Reports/Recommendations F. Traffic Safety Report of June 1, 2016 A.1 & B.1 Residents may not understand the rationale for these items. Motion was made by member Olson and seconded by member Bass to forward the June 1, 2016, Traffic Safety Report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. X. Adjournment at 8:25 p.m. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 2 J F M A M J J A S O N D SM WS # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 NAME TERM (Date)6/21 Bass, Katherine 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Boettge, Emily 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Brown, Andy 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Iyer, Surya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Loeffelholz, Ralf 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% Janovy, Jennifer 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Miranda, Lou 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Olson, Larry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Ding, Emily (student)9/1/2016 1 1 2 29% Ruehl, Lindsey (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 57% TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Certificate of Completion for 7171 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Certificate of Completion for 7171 France Avenue and authorize Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Certificate of Completion. INTRODUCTION: On Aug. 5, 2013, the City Council approved a development contract between the City and LB Edina, LLC, for the LB 71 France Addition project at 7171 France Avenue (the Byerly's site). LB Edina, LLC has fully complied with its obligations as required in the development contract. Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: Description Certificate of Completion 1 187859v1 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION The undersigned hereby certifies that LB Edina, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“LB Edina”) has fully complied with its obligations to construct the required Improvements under that document titled Development Contract dated August 5, 2013, recorded with the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on October 9, 2013, as Document No. T05125833 (“Agreement”), by and between the City of Edina (the “City”) and LB Edina relating to the property legally described on the attached Exhibit “A.” The issuance of this Certificate of Completion by the City does not affect, modify, or terminate the additional and continuing duties, covenants, and obligations of LB Edina, or its successors and assigns, as stated in the Agreement. The Hennepin County Registrar of Titles is hereby authorized to accept for recording the filing of this instrument, to be a conclusive determination of the satisfaction and termination of the covenants and conditions of the Agreement described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Certificate to be duly executed in its name and behalf on the _____ day of ________________, 2016. CITY OF EDINA By _________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor By _________________________________ Debra Mangen, City Clerk 2 187859v1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of __________, 2016, by James Hovland and Debra Mangen, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ____________________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 651-452-5000 AMP/cjh 3 187859v1 EXHIBIT A Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 1 and Outlot A, all in LB 71 France, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Reject Bid - Contract No. ENG 16-10 Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Installation Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Reject Bids for Contract No. ENG 16-10 Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Installation INTRODUCTION: See attached detailed Request for Purchase Report ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Reject ENG 16-10 Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Installation City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 July 19, 2016 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☐ ☒ Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Reject Bid – Contract No. ENG 16-10 Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Installation July 7, 2016 Sept. 7, 2016 S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. Pember Companies, Inc. C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. LS Black constructors, Inc. G. Urban Companies, Inc. $179,802.00 $199,351.00 $216,580.25 $220,689.20 $350,188.75 $382,662.50 Recommended Quote or Bid: Reject Bids Information/Background: The Pedestrian Bridge Abutment Installation, or Valley View Road pedestrian bridge as it was previously referred to, over the south fork of Nine Mile Creek was rebid after separating it from the Wooddale Bridge rehabilitation project. Staff’s expectation that bids would be lower was not met likely due to the time of year of the bid and the work load of bridge contractors. The engineers estimated cost for the pedestrian bridge abutment installation was $87,000. The previously rejected low bid was $133,376.05 Due to the increase in bid prices, the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund is not able to cover the higher costs. Moving forward, staff will rebid the project in late winter/early spring of 2017. This timing remains feasible considering the placement of the bridge superstructure onto the abutments is planned for the summer of 2017. The superstructure located in Bredesen Park will be salvaged by others. Staff is recommending the City Council reject the bid. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Contract No. ENG 16-15 2016 Sealcoating Improvements Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Request for Purchase for the 2016 Sealcoating Improvements. INTRODUCTION: See attached detailed Request for Purchase Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: ENG 16-15 2016 Sealcoating Improvements City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 July 19, 2016 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Request for Purchase - Award Bid – Contract No. ENG 16-15 2016 Sealcoating Improvements July 8, 2016 August 8, 2016 Allied Blacktop Company Pearson Bros, Inc. $74,006.55 $86,556.22 Recommended Quote or Bid: Allied Blacktop Company $74,006.55 Information/Background: Streets are designed for anticipated traffic volumes and vehicle loads and approximately a 25-year service life without any maintenance. With proactive maintenance operations performed at key points in the life of a pavement, service life can be extended at least to 40 years and possibly as long as 60 years. Street maintenance staff uses these practices to extend pavement service life: crack sealing, sealcoating, edge mill and overlay, and full mill and overlay. Sealcoating is a process of placing oil and rock to make the pavements more watertight, improve traction, and provide additional wearing surface thickness. This is typically done as the first maintenance operation within the first 7-10 years of the pavement life. The project plansheet, including a location map, is attached. The engineering estimate for these improvements totaled $97,941.50, including $79,368.00 for the three base bid areas and $18,573.50 for an alternate area. The recommended low bid includes the base bid plus the alternate. Funding for this improvement is from the Public Works Streets Department General Fund Budget. Staff recommends awarding the 2016 Sealcoating Improvements to Allied Blacktop Company to include South Cornelia A, Highlands A, Parkwood Knolls K, and South Cornelia C. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Brian Ryks, Executive Director Metropolitan Airport Commission Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: Brian Ryks, the new Executive Director of the MAC will make a presentation to the City Council. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:June Speak Up, Edina Presentation Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested. INTRODUCTION: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website SpeakUpEdina.org to collect ideas and opinions from residents. In June 2016, the discussion topic centered on City-provided recycling services. The City of Edina currently provides single-hauler recycling pick-up for residents. Residents are provided with a rolling cart to store recyclables, and recycling is picked up every other week. If needed, residents may request a second cart at no additional charge. Residents are charged $6 per quarter for recycling services, payable with their quarterly utility bills from the City. In this discussion, the City posed the following questions: Do you think the current cart sizes and pick-up schedules are adequate for your recycling needs? Why or why not? Would you prefer a weekly pickup? Currently, recycling is picked up every other week, and costs residents about $6 per quarter. Would you be willing to pay more for weekly pick-up of recycling? If so, how much more per quarter would you be willing to pay? Is the environmental impact of a weekly pick-up versus bi-weekly pick-up is important to you? Why or why not? Currently, Edina City Code requires refuse, recycling and yard waste carts to be stored out of view from the front street. Edina allows screening to be used to meet this requirement. Would you consider it reasonable to allow the containers to be stored next to the garage or house without additional screening? The discussion was open for comments between May 25 and July 11. During that time, 129 comments were made. During that time, 1,576 users visited the site 1,991 times, garnering 7,503 page views. All commenters in this discussion were from Edina. Attached are the comments from the discussion. Additionally, 103 comments were made on the City's NextDoor.com post. These comments are also attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Speak Up, Edina Comments NextDoor Comments NextDoor Messages Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes 64 4 129 11 93 PARTICIPANTS TOPICS ANSWERS REPLIES VOTES SUMMARY OF TOPICS CURRENT CARTS VS. NEEDS 63 Answers · 8 Replies Do you think the current cart sizes and pick-up schedules are adequate for your recycling needs? Why or why not? Would you prefer a weekly pickup? D B · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 9:07 am 9 Votes We'll be requesting a second cart as our bin is always overflowing or we have to hold additional recycling for the next pick up. We try to recycle as many items as possible, so the current cart fills up quickly. Hopefully a second cart will help, but I would be in favor of weekly pickup. Response: Michaela Bounds · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 10:00 pm Agree, have the exact same problem. I would be all for weekly recycling pick up. Jennifer Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 9:08 am 5 Votes It would be nice to have options for size of receptacle and frequency of pickup. Right now with a large container and biweekly pickup, it is frequently full to the brim, but it really depends on household size. Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 11:35 am 9 Votes I'm not in favor of weekly pickup because of the additional harm to the environment another truck on the streets would cause. Two or three carts is far preferable, and encourage folks to flatten recycling material so it uses less space in the carts. Dennis Fernkes · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 2:22 pm 3 Votes i have the smallest container available and I can wait six weeks before I need a pickup. 1 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes That is because I live alone and don't buy much. I would hate to pay more. January Thompson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 2:44 pm 6 Votes Our recycling bin is always overflowing. I would love weekly pick up! Katie Mason · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 2:44 pm 5 Votes Would LOVE weekly pickup. We are always overflowing. Current can size is fine if we can go to weekly pick up. If not, then I'd love the option to upgrade to a bigger size container. Response: DeEtta Goodmanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Jun 06, 2016 8:33 pm There has always been the option to have a bigger container. Brice Baradel · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 2:48 pm 5 Votes On a weekly schedule, we are always overflowing and still have excess that we can't fit. Would strongly prefer weekly pickup. Susie Van Hoomissen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 2:53 pm 7 Votes I would enjoy weekly recycling and every two weeks for garbage. Our garbage is on average half full every week with a family of four. Or a larger recycling can would be acceptable too. Less trucks on the road is the most environmental process! Ryn Melberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 2:55 pm 2 Votes The current containers would be fine if we had weekly service. Otherwise, more than one is needed per household to avoid it stacking up or recycling going in the trash. Greg Daggett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · May 26, 2016 2:59 pm 2 Votes Allow variety of bin sizes given variety of family size and consumption. Offer varying pick-up frequency based on demand. Color code bins to be weekly or bi-weekly to improve logistics and billing. Charge customers based on service type. Weekly cost may be disproportionate more due to lower subscriber base. Environmental effect is non-discussion in a supply/demand. If you are asking to provide an alternative means of 2 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes transportation (e.g., drone pick-up, then we can introduce environment). For now, the only mode I am aware of is truck. Bridget Heidorn · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 3:11 pm 8 Votes We would like weekly recycling - we're always overflowing! For garbage we would be sufficient for every two weeks. Nick van Goor · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 3:19 pm 2 Votes Seems to me that allowing a variety of sizes would be the most effective solution. Having multiple bins should also be an option, so that people don't have to get rid of existing bins and create more garbage in the process. (Unless the recycling bins themselves are recyclable, of course.) Leslie Iyer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 3:23 pm 8 Votes I would strongly support weekly recycling and bi-weekly garbage. Recycling overflowing and our 2 car garage cannot accommodate a 3rd can and still park cars in it - this must be common. Our garbage can is mostly empty. I'd also like single hauler for garbage (like recycling)- we have 7 garbage trucks on our street (14 in summer): it's bad for our pedestrians, our roadways, our environment, and our pocketbooks. Response: Judy Heimkes · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 28, 2016 10:00 am Hi Leslie, You spot on in your comment about recycling bins, garbage pickup and single hauler so we can save one wear 'n tear of streets and encourage less garbage and more recycling. Jordan Gilgenbach · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 3:41 pm 5 Votes Thanks for your comments so far! it seems many people run out of room with their current carts. The standard issue recycling carts are 65 gallons. For those who may not be aware, you can request to upgrade to a 95 gallon cart instead or to get a second 65 gallon cart to fit all your recycling at no additional cost. You can request this change by calling 952-826-0381. This can help to divert as much recyclable materials from the trash as possible. Response: Tony & Michelle Jones · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 3:43 pm I would like to get two 95 gallon bins but apparently we are not allowed 3 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Tony & Michelle Jones · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 3:42 pm 2 Votes We have two large bins and they are both overflowing. We get nasty grams from recycle pick up stating if not in bin they will NOT pick up. Weekly would be great or three bins. susan de Hoog · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 3:56 pm 5 Votes I do not want to pay more for this service. I think the current cart sizes and pick-up schedules are adequate for my recycling needs. I have done away with plastic bottles whenever possible and it helps to flatten the boxes and stack them in your container to save room. I think there is a lot individuals and families can do to cut down on recyclables by using re-usable containers. Response: DA Crawford · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · Jun 16, 2016 5:18 pm Absolutely - if I can go 1 month with 1 can, and I recycle everything that's allowed, I can't understand why so many are filling their bins up so fast. Richard Cheng · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 4:21 pm 4 Votes Plenty of space for our household. FC Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 4:36 pm 2 Votes My husband and I recycle as much as we can. After two weeks, our recycling bin is full. We usually have only one bag of trash per week. If we really want people to recycle more, make it easy with larger bins, weekly pickups or both. I often see recycle bins with boxes of additional recycling materials next to them. While I hate to see another truck polluting, I think this is the better choice to promote recycling. wally norlander · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 4:38 pm 1 Votes Our household (2 seniors) gets along just fine with bi-weekly pickups, but our neighbors obviously need weekly pickups. So that we don't have to look at their overflowing containers, we would pay the extra charge for more frequent pickups. Deb Hammer · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 5:32 pm 0 Votes I too regularly fill up a single bin every 2 weeks and would love a second bin or weekly pickup. If my recycle bin is too full, I end up putting my recycle in my garbage, if it has room. 4 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Response: Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 6:32 pm Really sorry, Deb that you "end up putting recycle in garbage", as you stated. Please ask for the largest recycle bin and, if that's not enough, two of them. See Susan de Hoog's note on how she quit buying bottled water and uses a reusable bottle instead. Are there other things you can do to reduce your recyclables? Thanks for understand the concern about adding to the garbage, maybe unnecessarily. Robert Have · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 5:35 pm 1 Votes The option to have a second receptacle would be great. Sarah Franssen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 6:21 pm 0 Votes We run out of room in the recycling bin every time. I would love weekly pick-up even more than two bins. I am definitely willing to pay more for this to happen. Steven Krikava · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 26, 2016 7:13 pm 4 Votes No to weekly pick up. Yes to continued single hauler. Kristopher Wilson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 7:19 pm 3 Votes Current cart options are adequate for MY needs. However, I would like to see Republic actually get out of the truck to pick up the cardboard people leave next to their recycle cart rather than just shove it over next to the garbage cart and leave a note about having to have all recycling IN the recycle cart. Response: Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Jun 16, 2016 1:15 pm Republic is the 2nd largest (next to Waste Management) hauler in the nation! Their share holders do VERY well. They know how to increase their profits. Requiring their truck drivers to stay in the truck cuts down on driver time, and justifies their wages. You can complain to the city, but no matter what, their contract with Edina goes through 2019, good service or bad. Response: Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Jun 16, 2016 1:22 pm Republic is the second largest hauler in the nation (next to Waste Management). Their share holders do VERY well! Republic knows how to make profits. Requiring their drivers to stay in the truck cuts down on time on a route, justifying wages paid. You can complain to the city, but Republic's contract with Edina goes through 2019, good service or bad. 5 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes John Thomas · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 7:32 pm 4 Votes It's just fine the way it is. Get a second cart if you have more stuff John Slothower III · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55343) · May 26, 2016 8:31 pm 3 Votes We are a two adult household and the single cart works fine with every other week pickup. We actually still subscribe to a newspaper so we have a lot of paper, and no problem. Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 9:34 pm 3 Votes I also prefer the bi-weekly pick up and think the option to select a larger or multiple carts makes the most sense logistically and cost-wise since many people don't require weekly pick up and multiple/larger carts should fulfill the needs of most people who have excess currently. Also, this option does not increase the cost for anyone, particularly for those who don't desire the additional pick up. Bill & Joan Schmit · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 9:51 pm 4 Votes One cart is fine and every other week pick-up is often enough for us. We would not be willing to pay more for a weekly pick-up as we do not need it. Bill & Joan Schmit · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 9:57 pm 0 Votes Our names are Bill and Joan Schmit. David Frenkel · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 10:17 pm 2 Votes Some communities have recycling centers that residents can drop off recycling into dumpsters. Would that be possible? With all the e-commerce shipments we all end up with a lot of cardboard that fills up recycling bins. Melissa Hunzelman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 27, 2016 7:55 am 2 Votes Our container is always overflowing as well and I was in favor of weekly pick-up, but I didn't realize we could order a second cart at no charge. Hopefully that will solve our problem. 6 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Stephanie Oyen · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 8:32 am 1 Votes I would prefer weekly pickup, cost is unimportant. And I greatly prefer surveys to discussion boards. Nate Larson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 9:38 am 4 Votes Household of four does just fine with the status quo; we rarely overfill the cart, and we recycle everything. Make a second cart an option for those who need it. Please, no more trucks tearing around the neighborhood! Mark Habas · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 9:49 am 0 Votes With the modest size of 1950's single car garages, and the requirement to keep the bins out of sight from the street, I can't handle larger bins or I will be forced to park an infinitely more valuable automobile in the driveway so I can keep my refuse and the bins that hold it under cover. Reduce the trash service options to 3 or 4 and send the recycling truck every week. That way we reduce the damage that massive and extremely heavy garbage haulers do to our crumbling streets and keep the bin sizes the same or smaller. Douglas Jones · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 27, 2016 10:48 am 1 Votes Our recycling cart is always full to overflowing whereas our trash cart (small one) is usually only half full. Two carts or the very large one are just not good for us. We would really like weekly pick up. Kelly Streit · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 27, 2016 11:26 am 0 Votes I do not want a second recycling bin. I do not have room in my garage. I would like weekly recycling. My bin is almost always overflowing. Especially around the holiday season. This is the first place I've ever lived with a choice of garbage companies - but it is also the best garbage service I've ever had, so I have mixed feelings about going to a single garbage carrier. Would not want to lose my company! Jim Stromberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 12:00 pm 2 Votes The present set-up works fine for my household. Do I recycle more than use garbage?...yep. But crushing my recyclables works just fine, and I certainly don't want more trucks on the road than we have now. If some need larger bin, or two bins - great. I think most people didn't realize that they could get additional help with their recyclables - now they can. I'd also like to go on record as wanting to keep garbage 7 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes pick-up on a weekly basis. The bin is never full, but summertime heat reeks havoc on odor and flies. :) Greg Arnott · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 27, 2016 1:36 pm 0 Votes As much as I dislike the number of garbage trucks on our streets (we live on the border of two areas with different pickup dates so we have twice as many trucks as homes within one area) I would support weekly pickup. Our two person household does a good job of filing the recycling cart after two weeks so I can see where larger households have a need for weekly pickup. I also would not be able to make room for another cart in the garage. I declined a cart for yard waste due to lack of space. claudia schnitker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 27, 2016 3:47 pm 2 Votes For our household twice a month pickup is adequate. Also one cart is fine. Better to not purchase so much stuff in the first place. Lisa Hoene · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 27, 2016 4:56 pm 0 Votes I would prefer weekly pickup with the same sized cart as we have now. Like others, we often have a pile in waiting and/or an overflowing cart. I would not want an extra cart for space reasons. It's already a problem to find space for both the garbage and recycling carts in our driveway, especially in the winter when snow piles up. Tracey Hester · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 27, 2016 10:09 pm 1 Votes I recently moved to Edina from out of state. I didn't realize I had it so good with garbage before. We had weekly city pick up for garbage and recycling and city bulk trash pick-up quarterly. Now, we have two large bins that are full each week. I feel like we are playing garbage Jenga to make it fit. I hate putting recycling items in the garbage and also hate having them hanging around. We do not have room for a third bin and I would love weekly recycling pick up! Curt Carlson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 28, 2016 12:39 pm 3 Votes For some of us (we are a family of 2), one bin collected every other week is fine. I'd rather not have to pay more for a weekly service we don't need. DA Crawford · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 30, 2016 9:34 pm 1 Votes I take my cart out once a month, sometimes every 2 weeks - so the currently solution works for me. I am not willing to pay for more since I don't need it. 8 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes K. E. · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 31, 2016 9:20 am 1 Votes With a second recycling cart, we have adequate capacity on a bi-weekly pick-up schedule; as a household of two now, we usually fill one recycling cart completely, one slightly to halfway, garbage can 1/3 full. We don't need a weekly pickup but could see that larger families would. However, we'd like the city to consider compostable recycling which would reduce garbage further and increase recycling. We'd be happy to pay additional for that. Our service overall has been excellent for the 24 years we've lived in Edina. Katie A · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 31, 2016 10:28 am 1 Votes Current pick-up schedule works fine for us (two adults) and do not want a cost increase. We have not been impressed with Republic’s service. They have dumped our recycling into the street (literally, the guy got out and was pick up the pieces). They have left our can in the street and in the middle of our driveway. Let’s hope their contract is almost up so the city can contract with a more conscientious company! I also agree with previous posters who suggest single-hauler trash pick up to reduce the impact of so many garbage haulers. Our street will be reconstructed this summer and, as I understand it, garbage trucks are one of the biggest offenders for wear and tear on our roads. I’d like to make that $10,000 assessment we’re about to have last as long as possible. However, I can’t imagine bi-weekly trash pick up in the summertime; can you imagine the smell of two weeks worth of dog feces in the heat??? Picking up and disposing of dog waste is a topic for another discussion (or just look on Nextdoor for the many threads related to dog waste!). I would also like to see increased participation in organics recycling/composting or a citywide program. This has significantly reduced the amount of trash we produce in a week. I would also like to see more recycling cans available in public spaces like 50th and France. It’s great to read that people are recycling so much. I think there could definitely be more education and outreach on what is and what is not accepted. How about a video on how and what to recycle in Edina? A Twitter feed or Facebook page for residents to ask quick questions about – “can this item be recycled?” and get fast answers. Create a searchable recycling “dictionary” to see if items can be recycled (similar concept to TSA’s “when I fly can I bring my” search feature). Recycling is important and it could be a way for the city to connect with residents. Elizabeth x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 31, 2016 12:56 pm 0 Votes We need weekly pickup. We regularly have far more recycling than will fit in our bin every 2 weeks. And no, we are not going to get a second bin. Then we would have 2 for recycling, 1 for garbage and 1 for yard waste. The solution isn't for me to find yet another place in my garage or side yard for a 4th bin. The solution is to pick up Recycling every week and move Garbage pick up to every 2 weeks if you REALLY want to incentivize people to recycle. 9 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Scott Peterson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Jun 01, 2016 5:14 pm 2 Votes Weekly collection is needed. It is the variable that needs to be addressed. Larger bins would be unmanageable for many folks as they would be too heavy. More bins are not a realistic option either. The families that generate the most recycling also contend with bikes and other trappings of a family that will make additional bins undesirable. In our neighborhood, recycling bins are over-flowing and garbage bins have a single bag. Why do we have multiple garbage haulers each week, but only one recycling collection every two weeks? Easily 80% of our family "waste" is recycling. Focus on the big problem. While I appreciate the notion of environmental impact for weekly recycling, we ought to applaud the progress that has been made, cut a couple of weekly garbage trucks to offset the impact and make it even more attractive to recycle. Chris Kennedy · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 07, 2016 12:32 pm 0 Votes It pains me to put recyclables in the garbage, but I am sometimes forced to do this because our two large recycling bins are jam-packed. Please offer weekly pickup! Colleen Crampton · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 09, 2016 10:19 pm 2 Votes Keep 2 week schedule. We don't need another day of big trucks rumbling through the neighborhood. Donna Callender · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 11, 2016 5:50 pm 0 Votes We've lived here 20 years. Until last year or two, we always had weekly recycling pickup. I don't know why the city changed that without asking the residents. Bi-weekly is not enough. We are a small household, but we recycle everything we can, and the bin is often overflowing. Adding another bin would be an inconvenience we don't need. If the city is serious about recycling, then let's make it easier for residents, not harder. Dorothy Lodahl · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Jun 16, 2016 2:42 pm 1 Votes Every two weeks are fine with me - and I recycle every I can. Kate Frederick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 16, 2016 3:22 pm 0 Votes We would love weekly recycling pickup, as we already have the larger bin -- which still doesn't have enough capacity -- and our garage doesn't have much space to begin with. Adding one more truck every other week could easily be offset by removing at least one garbage hauler option. It sounds like some fee flexibility would be welcome, so smaller 10 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes households could have a smaller bin and pay a little less than those of us with more recyclables. Connie Carrino · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Jun 19, 2016 3:32 pm 0 Votes The current bi-weekly pick-up schedule and cart size for recycling works for us. We are, however, just a household of two adults AND we greatly reduced our recycling collection once we installed a drinking water filtration system. No more bottled water! Still, I do see many households with overflowing containers so that tells me that there is a community-wide need for an increase in collection. This isn't just an individual household decision, it is citywide with future considerations about what is best for the environment. I think it is a good idea to promote recycling and if that means going to every week collection, that's fine with me. And I like some of the other suggestions mentioned in this discussion including: -Improve communication between recycling company and residents so folks know they can get a larger cart. -If it is a weekly pick-up there would be no confusion about the schedule. -YES!! Please go to fewer haulers for garbage pick-up coordinate by the City (preferably one or maybe 4 haulers divided by quadrant). And include environmentally-friendly standards for these companies to include smaller trucks and offering organic pick-up/recycling (ours currently offers this). amanda waterman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 20, 2016 2:26 pm 0 Votes We would like an extra container and weekly pick up. we are overflowing every week with it piling up. Laura Soderling · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Jul 01, 2016 7:39 am 0 Votes Household of 6 and we definitely need weekly recycling pickup. No room in our 1950 garage for an additional bin. INCREASE COST AND SERVICE 30 Answers · 2 Replies Currently, recycling is picked up every other week, and costs residents about $6 per quarter. Would you be willing to pay more for weekly pick-up of recycling? If so, how much more per quarter would you be willing to pay? D B · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 9:09 am 2 Votes Since I understand that businesses need to re-coup their costs, I would be willing to pay more for weekly recycling pickup. I think between $9-$12 per quarter would be a fair price. 11 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 11:31 am 5 Votes I don't support weekly pick up of recycling. The extra cost isn't as important to me as is the environmental impact of yet another truck polluting the air, causing additional noise, tearing up the asphalt, and posing yet another safety hazard for small children. People can be encouraged to flatten their recyclables to take up less space in the carts, and can be given more carts if requested. Dennis Fernkes · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 2:24 pm 7 Votes No change for me. Leave it as it is. Katie Mason · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 2:46 pm 1 Votes Yes, I would pay more for either a bigger container or for weekly pickup. We are always overflowing.- We would pay double or more. It would encourage more recycling. Response: Kristopher Wilson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 7:02 pm Just FYI - You can already get a larger or second container for no additional cost to you by calling 952-826-0381. Ryn Melberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 2:53 pm 9 Votes I would absolutely love weekly recycling pick up. It isn't about "flattening boxes" since we already do that. It is about prioritizing recycling OVER trash pick up. I would much rather have weekly recycling and alternate week trash pick ups. This would also not change the number of trucks on the road causing other environmental issues or damage to the roads (won't address people having their children of any size playing the street since that is just . . . ). If reducing trucks was a real concern, then we should go to City service for trash because that would reduce an average of 6 trucks per neighborhood to 1. The increased cost of additional recycling pick ups is nominal - a cup of Starbucks every 3 months. It is also nothing compared to the savings of reduced trash collection. Greg Daggett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · May 26, 2016 3:00 pm 1 Votes Double, $12, if same container. If you provide a larger container, maybe I stay with bi-weekly. 12 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Leslie Iyer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 3:25 pm 3 Votes Would pay more for weekly pickup of recyclables- I assume if we could go to biweekly trash pickup that would more than cover the cost, as would the lower rates we would get through a single hauler system. Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 3:38 pm 4 Votes I really like Leslie Iyer's suggestion of going biweekly for trash pick up. We only have one grocery bag of trash each week. Still thinking, though, that more recycling carts for those who need them would be better than weekly pickup. Response: Dorothy Lodahl · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Jun 16, 2016 2:50 pm can you imagine the smell during the summer if it was only biweekly trash pick up - ugh! Richard Cheng · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 4:24 pm 6 Votes Bi-weekly pick-up is sufficient. Robert Have · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 5:38 pm 3 Votes If you double the service I would be happy to pay double the fee Kristopher Wilson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 7:10 pm 2 Votes Reminder to all that you can already get a larger or second container for no additional cost to you by calling 952-826-0381. I increased my container size and bi-weekly is working fine for me. I would like to see analysis that shows that the increases in additional captured and used recycled material offset the environmental impact of running another truck a week over the current plan. John Thomas · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 7:34 pm 5 Votes Leave it the way it is. No more additional costs. Get an extra cart if you have more stuff DA Crawford · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 26, 2016 8:29 pm 1 Votes NO - EVERYTHING has increased. If you need more you should pay more. Recycling is sold so any costs involved would be returned +. 13 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Enough with the increased costs on everything - a few dollars here, a few hundred there. Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 9:41 pm 4 Votes I don't support an increased cost. I think already having the option of selecting a larger or multiple carts as needed is sufficient. Perhaps the city and/or Republic should notify residents they already have that option available at no cost since apparently very few are aware of it. Since many people don't require additional pick up, I don't think the cost should be increased since it is not necessary for many people and the increased cost has absolutely no benefit for those residents. JAMES RACINE · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 10:27 pm 6 Votes As a recent transplant to Minnesota/Edina, bi-weekly recycling was a great disappointments with home ownership. It is not only inconvenient, but discourages recycling. We often fill up our recycling bin before our garbage bin, and then find ourselves throwing things that shouldn't sit in landfills. As a "premier" suburb of such a wonderfully "green state" we should be leading the way in this, not looking to pinch pennies at the cost of our environment. Melissa Hunzelman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 27, 2016 8:02 am 3 Votes I would prefer that larger or more carts be offered, as opposed to weekly service. I didn't realize this was an option. Maybe advertise that before considering moving to weekly service at an additional charge. Nate Larson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 9:40 am 2 Votes We're not willing to pay more for weekly pickup. Biweekly is perfect. I'd rather pay for a second cart as an option if we ever need it. Shane Betz · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 27, 2016 10:33 am 2 Votes Weekly pickup with same containers would be great, certainly willing to pay more. I don't want another or larger container in my garage or driveway. Kelly Streit · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 27, 2016 11:29 am 4 Votes I do not have room in my garage for a second recycling container. i would be more than happy to pay extra for weekly service. My bin is almost always overflowing. 14 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Jim Stromberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 12:26 pm 2 Votes Keep the service as is. Need more room? Increase container size. Too many trucks on the streets already. Bob MacPhail · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 12:39 pm 2 Votes No, I would not want to pay more for weekly service. The bi-weekly service works fine for us. Greg Arnott · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 27, 2016 1:46 pm 0 Votes I would be willing to pay another $5-10 per quarter but like the idea of different colored carts if someone wants weekly pickup and somebody else does. It doesn't eliminate the trucks but provides the service to those who need it to prevent putting recyclables in the garbage where there is not room for a second recycling cart.. Lisa Hoene · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 27, 2016 4:57 pm 0 Votes Yes, I'm willing to pay more for weekly pick up. $9-12 seems reasonable. Elizabeth x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 31, 2016 12:59 pm 1 Votes Move garbage pick up to every 2 weeks and recycling to every week. That would incentivize people to recycle more, compost more and limit actual garbage while keeping our environmental impact of trucks and pick up routines as is. Chris Kennedy · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 07, 2016 12:35 pm 0 Votes I love the idea of moving recycling pick up to weekly and garbage pick up to every two weeks! Donna Callender · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 11, 2016 5:54 pm 0 Votes I'd be happy to pay a piddly couple of bucks a month for reinstating weekly recycling. We get gouged much worse when we're assessed for roadwork caused by all the monster trucks tearing down and constructing monster houses. 15 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Connie Carrino · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Jun 19, 2016 3:45 pm 0 Votes Although we are fine with bi-weekly pick-up for our needs, we would be willing to pay a little more to help encourage recycling throughout the community. It seems by this discussion, there is a need. How much? Well, since we are paying $6 per quarter for EOW, doing the math would tell me that we should expect to pay $12 per quarter for weekly. So that's not a big deal. Dennis Fernkes · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Jul 05, 2016 10:00 am 0 Votes I have very little to recycle being that I live in a single-occupant house. I do not want to subsidize other people that consume too much. Let those people obtain additional containers and pay accordingly. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 21 Answers · 1 Replies Is the environmental impact of a weekly pick-up versus bi-weekly pick-up is important to you? Why or why not? D B · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 9:13 am 13 Votes The environmental impact of weekly versus bi-weekly pick-up IS important to me, however I feel that the impact of weekly recycling pickup could really be offset by reducing the number of licensed garbage haulers in the city. Currently there are SEVEN. Even if you cut that in half, residents would still have plenty of options but it would significantly reduce the needless inefficiencies of SEVEN garbage trucks driving up and down all the same city streets. Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 11:07 am 5 Votes The environmental impact of weekly versus bi-weekly pick up is definitely important to me and to many others (please see the discussion on Nextdoor Neighbor). Why not give people two or even three recycling carts, when requested, rather than put more truck traffic on our streets? I agree with D B regarding reducing the number of haulers the city allows us to choose from. Seven trucks up and down our streets weekly causes way too much noise, wear and tear on the streets, and traffic hazard for children. I further request that the city cease supporting the national refuse haulers, Waste Management, Allied, and Re... who definitely don't need our support, give poorer service, and use large three axle trucks that cause damage to the streets, especially at intersections and in cul-de-sacs where they have to turn. Most of us (see Nextdoor Neighbor discussion) prefer supporting the smaller, local companies who give better service and use two axle trucks. Dennis Fernkes · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 26, 2016 2:26 pm 1 Votes 16 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Any environmental impact in my neighborhood is negligible. Katie Mason · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 2:47 pm 2 Votes That is something to consider, but the increase in recyclying that would take place (vs. throwing recycleable items in the trash because recycling is full) out weighs it to me. Ryn Melberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 2:58 pm 4 Votes The environmental impact is very important and I wish that Edina prioritized recycling over trash. As it is now, Edina has more services and options for trash, which makes that the easier option and the one that people use most. If Edina was serious about recycling, then the City would make recycling the easier and most available option. Greg Daggett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · May 26, 2016 3:03 pm 1 Votes Support recycling. Support environment within reason. Don't care if there are more trucks on the road. Bigger fish to fry. Leslie Iyer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 3:28 pm 2 Votes Definitely: and it's not just about air pollution: our neighborhood environment on pickup day is loud, sometimes dangerous, and crowded with no fewer than 15 different garbage trucks (recycling, 7 hauler, 7 yard waste). It's a pointless waste of many kinds of resources. Kristopher Wilson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2016 6:54 pm 0 Votes I am OK with bi-weekly pickup after I upgraded my cart to a 96gl size... except when I forget which week is recycle week. Even though there is an option to get larger size and multiple carts, though, not everyone wants or has room for those options. Would the increases in recycling captured by going (back) to weekly service outweigh the negative impact of running another truck a week? If so, I would be for it, but if not, then I would be against it. Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 26, 2016 9:49 pm 2 Votes I think the environmental impact should always be weighed in decision making. I think by leaving the bi-weekly pick up as it is and alerting folks they have options for larger or multiple carts is the obvious choice since it appears few are even aware of those options to begin with. Then the environmental concern will be a non- issue. 17 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Barry Rosenthal · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 26, 2016 10:12 pm 3 Votes We could have weekly pick-up of recycling along with reduced traffic and reduced cost if we went to a city-wide single trash collection company like we have a single city-wide recycling company. Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 27, 2016 8:02 am 1 Votes I'm just going to say it. The people who are against weekly recycling because of the environmental damage an extra truck would make are just not being honest with their reasons. If they have other issues, that is fine, but an extra truck is nothing compared to the benefit if getting a city truly on board with recycling. Weekly recycling, please! Nate Larson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 9:21 am 4 Votes Keep recycling the way it is. The impact of *doubling* the number of recycling trucks on our streets is not insignificant. The trucks pollute with exhaust from a diesel engine, putting out visible soot into the air you breathe. This is the fine particulate pollution (PM2.5) that causes so much suffering on bad-air days. With four in the house, we rarely overfill our recycling bin -- and we recycle everything accepted. Those households that need it should have the option of paying a bit more to have an extra bin -- this is much less waste than driving the trucks around twice as often. We should also decrease the number of garbage haulers. When I lived in Minneapolis, we had no choice, one garbage truck, a cheaper bill, and they took everything we put out there: mattresses, dead TVs, computers, batteries, everything. It was as close to heaven as trash hauling gets. Why people have this addiction to "freedom of choice" over so banal a topic is beyond me. Response: Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 27, 2016 7:28 pm I agree wholeheartedly with Nate regarding getting rid of all the garbage truck options. It's ridiculous. Right now, we have 7.5 trucks running every week - 7 garbage and .5 recycling. Is the answer not clear? I still vote to move from 7.5 total trucks to 2 every week. One garbage and one recycling. I have two of the largest recycling bins and look like a hoarder by the end of the first week. Jim Stromberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 27, 2016 12:31 pm 1 Votes 18 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes We do NOT want to encourage more trucks on our city streets. Recycle as is. Get bigger bin. Reduce the number of garbage haulers - 7 is waaay too many. Lisa Hoene · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 27, 2016 5:02 pm 3 Votes I am concerned about environmental impacts, but the argument about extra trucks on the roads, etc. doesn't change my preference to have weekly pick up. Just doesn't seem to outweigh the positive impact of recycling vs. guiltily putting bottles, cans and paper in the garbage where they will sit in a landfill for a jillion years. Sara Kaufman Sara Kaufman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 27, 2016 7:29 pm 2 Votes Two trucks every week - 1 garbage and 1 recycling. Easy. K. E. · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 31, 2016 9:26 am 2 Votes I am concerned about the environmental impact of essentially doubling the trucks driving around. However, I agree with the other participant that if there were fewer companies involved, there would be fewer trucks overall and far less overlap in routes which could mean no net increase in environmental impact if recycling was done weekly. Elizabeth x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 31, 2016 1:00 pm 2 Votes Move garbage pick up to every 2 weeks and recycling to every week. That would incentivize people to recycle more, compost more and limit actual garbage while keeping our environmental impact of trucks and pick up routines as is. Jennifer Renaud · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 31, 2016 3:23 pm 2 Votes I'd love to see weekly garbage and recycling pick up with a city negotiated contract. That would get us far fewer trucks on the road but we should also remember that the volume of trash/recycling remains the same no matter how often we pick up. I'd also like to see the yard waste include compost. I moved from Seattle recently and my yard waste included actual yard waste, food scraps and shredded paper. Chris Kennedy · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 07, 2016 5:44 pm 0 Votes My two large recycling bins are jam-packed at the end of two weeks. Every time I wheel them down to the end of our driveway I think about the fact that this material will NOT end up in a landfill, but will be reused. I have to believe that the environmental impact of recycling versus relying on landfills outweighs the impact of trucks on our roads. 19 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Jun 16, 2016 12:56 pm 2 Votes I completely agree with others who think a choice of 7 garbage haulers just doesn't make sense. Some people want choice so a single hauler doesn't get careless about service since we can always choose another hauler. There's some merit to this argument, but a choice of 7???? There are three local haulers with the two, rather than three axle trucks. Those three are Vierkant, Suburban Waste, and Garbage Man. Eliminate the national companies: Waste Management, Republic, and Allied. The seventh, Aspen, isn't national and gives good service, but does have three axle trucks. If Edina goes to weekly recycling pick-up, please let's support one of the three local companies to pick up on BIG Republic's off week. CART STORAGE 15 Answers · 0 Replies Currently, Edina City Code requires refuse, recycling and yard waste carts to be stored out of view from the front street. Edina allows screening to be used to meet this requirement. Would you consider it reasonable to allow the containers to be stored next to the garage or house without additional screening? Dennis Fernkes · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Jun 16, 2016 1:38 pm 2 Votes No, I don't want to see my neighbors' carts stored outside of the garage. Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Jun 16, 2016 1:41 pm 3 Votes Allowing storage of containers next to the garage or house without additional screening seems very reasonable when there is not enough space in the garage. Many people have reported that the reason they don't have enough carts for recycling is because there's no space to store them out of sight. Rather than have yet another noisy truck on our streets polluting the air and grinding the asphalt, better to have a cart visible from the street. wally norlander · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Jun 16, 2016 2:01 pm 0 Votes I would rather not look at my neighbors' garbage and recycling containers, but they all keep them within full view, without any screening, and unless I call the Health Department or the Police, no one pays any attention. Mark Habas · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Jun 16, 2016 2:30 pm 2 Votes We all have to look at junked automobiles and boats in driveways and yards, vacated and deteriorating houses assumed to be pegged for demolition within the next 6 - 12 months (frequently with weeds/grass well over a foot tall) - what do a few additional 20 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes trash bins matter (though I will endeavor to keep mine out of sight if size permits)? Drop the number of trash vendors destroying our streets weekly by 50% or more and send the recycling truck weekly. Sarah Franssen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Jun 16, 2016 3:02 pm 0 Votes I would prefer not to see the carts, but my neighbors leave them out regardless of the statute, I suggest you don't enact anything you aren't willing to enforce. Melissa Hunzelman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · Jun 16, 2016 3:46 pm 2 Votes I think it's reasonable to allow them alongside the house or garage (in a side yard as opposed to the front yard). DA Crawford · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · Jun 16, 2016 4:55 pm 0 Votes I think having these carts (the numbers are growing) trashes up the neighborhood. Do we not have backyards? How hard is it to wheel them to the street from the backyard? Jim Stromberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Jun 16, 2016 5:32 pm 3 Votes I would suggest that if there isn't enough room in a garage area for storage, that screening them from view is very reasonable. Storing them next to the garage without screening might mean that the next-door neighbor now has them right in their sight-line from the dining room table. Having your cans behind a screen that makes them invisible is not a hardship, and the requirement to do so should not be relaxed. Let's keep Edina's image the way it is. And, if current regulations are not being followed, please make that known to City Hall. Lisa Hoene · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 16, 2016 7:08 pm 2 Votes I'm with Jim Stromberg. I think we should stick with the screening policy and enforce it. Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Jun 16, 2016 7:14 pm 1 Votes Yes, I would fully support keeping the garbage and recycling cart(s) outside next to a garage. I think this option far outweighs the alternatives as a reasonable option. Chris Kennedy · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 16, 2016 7:40 pm 0 Votes 21 of 22 Full Report Recycling Services Closed Jul 11, 2016 · Discussion · 64 Participants · 4 Topics · 129 Answers · 11 Replies · 93 Votes I''m a big recycling fan, but I'm not in favor of carts being left out in view. Agree with Jim Stromberg. John Slothower III · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55343) · Jun 17, 2016 8:46 am 0 Votes I would prefer not to see carts from the street. Like several others have said - there are enough issues with junky looking yards already. Connie Carrino · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Jun 19, 2016 3:51 pm 0 Votes Please keep the current ordinance and require that garbage, recycling, yard waste carts are kept out of sight and/or behind screening. amanda waterman · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 20, 2016 2:35 pm 0 Votes I agree to keep the current ordinance and keeping these out of sight or behind screening however I do feel there are people in our neighborhood that don't follow this and have their carts at the end of their driveway for almost a week and then always have their carts outside their garage. maybe a friendly reminder to neighborhoods what the ordinance is. Ana Davis · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Jun 21, 2016 7:54 am 0 Votes I have a family of seven and three recycling carts that are full every week. We produce one small bag of household trash each week. If Hennepin County wants to live up to its commitment to reducing household waste and increasing recycling, Edina should provide a weekly pick up for recycling and provide homes with two or more cans. I have a single car garage with no room for my three recycling bins and small trash can, so I store them in the alley long side my house. There has been no issue with this until new neighbors moved in and made complaints about it to the city. I have now spent more then $100 on trees and screens. When I walk my neighborhood, most houses do store their trash and recycling cans outside. If Edina maintains this code, it needs to enforce it for EVERYONE, or change the code. 22 of 22 Full Report 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Public Hearing: Consider Vacation of Sanitary Sewer Easement, 6754 Valley View Road, Resolution No. 2016-67 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2016-67. INTRODUCTION: The request to vacate the existing sanitary sewer easement comes from Independent School District #273 as part of the redevelopment of their site at the middle and high schools at 6754 Valley View Road. Independent School District #273 has granted a new sanitary sewer easement and the sanitary sewer pipe will be moved to this new location at their expense. See attached graphic showing the existing and new utility easements. Private utility companies were contacted for feedback regarding the vacation request. They have no objection to the vacation. Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution No. 2016-67. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2016-67 Graphic of Existing and New Utility Easements RESOLUTION NO. 2016-67 VACATING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 6754 VALLEY VIEW ROAD WHEREAS, a petition was received on June 1, 2016, from Independent School District #273, who owns the property at 6754 Valley View Road, dedicated as Unplatted 05 116 21, requesting that it be vacated; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice was given and the hearing was held on July 19, 2016, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota: 1. That the following described sanitary sewer easement is hereby vacated: That part of the 60.00 foot wide sanitary sewer easement granted to the Village of Edina over the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 116, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies Westerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 30.00 feet West of the following described "Line A" and its extensions, and which lies Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 30.00 feet Southwesterly of the following described "Line B" and its extensions. The centerline of said 60.00 foot wide easement is described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the centerline of Valley View Road and a line drawn parallel with and distant 90.00 feet South of the East and West Quarter line of said Section 5; thence South 89 degrees 41 minutes 14 seconds West, assumed bearing, along said line drawn parallel with and distant 90.00 feet South of the East-West Quarter line of Section 5, a distance of 174.02 feet; thence deflecting to the left 23 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds on a bearing of South 66 degrees 41 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 165.00 feet; thence deflecting to the left 10 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds on a bearing of South 56 degrees 41 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 240.00 feet; thence deflecting to the left 23 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds on a bearing of South 33 degrees 41 minutes 14 seconds West, a distance of 260.00 feet; thence deflecting to the right 56 degrees 20 minutes 30 seconds on a bearing of North 89 degrees 58 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 477.93 feet to a point to be hereafter referred to as "Point C"; thence continue North 89 degrees 58 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 31.72 feet; thence deflect to the right 50 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds on a bearing of North 39 degrees 28 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 238.40 feet; thence deflect to the left 05 degrees 14 minutes 00 seconds on a bearing of North 44 degrees 42 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 215.25 feet; thence deflect to the right 26 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds on a bearing of North 18 degrees 12 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 411.85 feet to a point to be hereafter referred to as "Point D"; thence deflect to the left 32 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds on a bearing of North 50 degrees 22 minutes 16 seconds West, a distance of 443.85 feet and said centerline there terminating. "Line A" is described as follows: Beginning at the above described reference "Point C"; thence North 00 degrees 38 minutes 33 seconds West, a distance of 483.27 feet and said "Line A" there terminating. "Line B" is described as follows: Beginning at the above described reference "Point D"; thence South 63 degrees 17 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 316.38 feet and said "Line B" there terminating. 2. That the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute all documents necessary, in the opinion of the City Attorney, to effect the transfer of this property. Dated: July 19, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 19, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Sketch Plan Review: 7700 France Avenue for Frauenshuh Real Estate on behalf of Twin City Orthopedics Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Provide non-binding comments on a potential development proposal at 7700 France Avenue for Frauenshuh Real Estate Group on behalf of Twin City Orthopedic to construct a medical office building. INTRODUCTION: See attached Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Planning Commission Minutes Revised Plans Submitted 07-19-2016 From:Cary Teague To:Deb Mangen; Chad Millner; Ross Bintner Subject:FW: TCO/7700 Sketch Package Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 2:09:59 PM Attachments:07-14-16 site render-7 GRADE.PDF 07-14-16 site render-7 DECK LEVEL.PDF 07-14-16 site render-7 PHASE II.PDF 07-14-16 site render-7 OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM.PDF 07-14-16 site render-7 PEDESTRIAN DIAGRAM.PDF image005.png image006.png See attached revised plans. Cary Teague, Community Development Director 952-826-0460 | Fax 952-826-0389 | Cell 952-826-02364801 W. 50th St. | Edina, MN 55424cteague@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov/Planning From: David Anderson [mailto:david.anderson@frauenshuh.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 8:38 AMTo: Cary TeagueCc: David AndersonSubject: TCO/7700 Sketch Package Cary, Please give me a call to run through this package briefly. Thanks, Cary. Best Regards, David M. Anderson Senior Vice President 7101 West 78th Street Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55439 952.767.2838 (direct) 612.845.4257 (cell) www.frauenshuhcommercial.com Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is addressed. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the sender. Unintended transmission shall not constitute waiver of the attorney-client or any other privilege. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Partners in Energy Electricity Action Plan and Memorandum of Understanding Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Partners in Energy Electricity Action Plan and Authorize City Manager to Sign Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel Energy INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report for context. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Electricity Action Plan Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel Energy Record of Plan Update July 19, 2016 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Ross Bintner P.E., Environmental Engineer Partners in Energy Electricity Action Plan and Memorandum of Understanding Information / Background: On June 17, 2015, Council adopted a Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel Partners in Energy to join the Partners in Energy program to assist in development of an energy action plan and support the implementation of the plan. On August 5, 2015, Council directed staff to solicit volunteers to form a planning team, and members were appointed on September 1. Between October 14, 2015 and May 11, 2016, the planning team held five workshops and three focus area small group workshops to explore Edina’s municipal, commercial and residential sector electricity use, and create a plan to reduce its associated greenhouse gas. The resulting Partners in Energy, Electricity Action Plan (EAP) plan was developed and has been reviewed by the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) and is attached for Council’s consideration. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Xcel Energy is also attached for Council consideration. The MOU defines the level of effort, resources and coordination that Xcel Energy and the City of Edina will commit to undertake within the initial 18 month implementation period. Plan Summary The EAP defines ongoing, immediate and long-term actions for the energy use in the municipal, residential, and commercial sectors. The plan focuses on reducing electricity use and associated greenhouse gases by using existing tools, coordinating communications channels to provide sector specific education, and outreach to put people and businesses in touch with data and resources to understand and reduce energy use, and to lower environmental impact by switching to renewable energy. In the municipal sector, the plan focuses on supporting existing building energy conservation work, and considering the purchase of renewable energy. Work will be coordinated by the City of Edina, led by the sustainability coordinator with assistance from Xcel Energy. STAFF REPORT Page 2 EEC Review and Comment The EEC has assumed close coordination of implementation, and has begun to structure their working groups around the three sectors defined in the plan. At the May 12 EEC meeting, an early draft of the EAP was shared and input was sought. A final draft of the EAP was reviewed at the June 9 EEC meeting generating the following member comments: Chair Zarrin comments: • Unit of KWH, metric tons of CO2 be used for all 3 sectors with % goal reduction. Be consistent, it is used for the residential section. Not use for the city operations and business. Specifically a unit should be used that is on the electric bill, beside money. • Is baseline 2009 or 2012? Be consistent. • Mention the first phase plan is on the electricity. Plans for gas, transportation, and water reduction will be worked on and will be shared with the public in parallel with the electricity actions, TBD. Include water, solid waste and gas consumption data to the package to have the baseline. Since energy efficiency is part of actions for all sectors we need to have some baseline data on this package. EEC work group for each sector to include in their actions to work on gas, water, and solid waste reduction and work with Solid waste and organic WG and Water quality WG. • Add outline/bolt of energy conservation to the residential action. • Show case a couple of residents and business volunteers data on the city’s website as they participate as partners on reduction of GHG. • Page 32, educate staff and manager on the benefit and ways to reduce GHG. • Page 32, city operations, Set an example/show case, city reduction actions and share with resident and businesses. • Residential, page 37, Xcel Energy, provide customer tracking info. Delete Xcel Energy, last box, coordinate with EEC and Xcel Energy and provide analysis of policy options. • Page 39, Add energy unit. • Page 39, Leadership, add city council member as a champion. • Xcel energy to update the group on their progress on the renewable solar energy project for business and resident. • City to participate in Met council project participation. • Page 38, Add mandatory energy disclosure for large businesses per Minneapolis model. • Executive summary page, add specific goal and action for each sector in % as well as including KWH and co2 reduction for all sectors. Member Jackson comments: • This is an ambitious plan that will take a lot of work from a lot of people to implement this long term plan. • CEE was very thorough, but a lot of it is community action oriented. It will be interesting to see how effective we are at getting the community involved. Member Satterlee comments: • Page 34, under the City Facilities timeline present regularly to EEC, we should suggest how regularly the presentations are quarterly, etc. • Appendix 7 maybe add a detail timeline for city actions by quarter to match the residential and business work groups. • Page 32, update the names of the new working groups and subcommittee that were created by EEC. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Member Mohanty comments: • This is an ambitious effort with a lot of awareness building. • It would be great to have more metrics. • Receive lessons learned from other cities. • Behavioral process on consumption that causes GHG. Member Glahn had no comments. Member Manser comments: • The entire report is on electricity through 2017, so add a section that lists what we aren’t including Transportation, etc. • Agrees on including different group percentages that Chair Zarrin discussed. Member Horan comments: • Would like to work with Businesses on Recycling. Member Seeley had no comments. As a result of EEC comment, the plan was updated. Attached to this report is a record of changes in response to EEC comment. The MOU with Xcel Energy is also attached to this report. The MOU spells out specific areas of coordination and support, and resources Edina can draw on during plan implementation. Staff recommends Council approve the Partners in Energy Electricity Action Plan and authorize City Manager to sign the attached Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel Energy. Attachments Partners in Energy – Electricity Action Plan Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel Energy Record of plan update following EEC meeting An Electricity Action Plan for: Draft Updated 6/27/16 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. i Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 The City of Edina – Community Background ......................................................................... 2 Demographics ........................................................................................................................ 3 Businesses & Employment .................................................................................................... 3 Education ............................................................................................................................... 3 Housing .................................................................................................................................. 4 Commitment to Sustainability ................................................................................................ 4 Community Communications and Outreach ........................................................................... 7 Xcel Energy Partners in Energy .............................................................................................. 8 Where Does the Community Stand? – Baseline Electricity Analysis...................................13 Residential Electricity Use .....................................................................................................16 Business Electricity Use ........................................................................................................20 City Electricity Use and Data .................................................................................................21 School District Electricity Use and Sustainability ...................................................................23 Where is Edina Headed? – Edina’s Energy Vision, Focus Areas, and Goals ........................25 Focus Area: Municipal Facilities ............................................................................................27 Focus Area: Residential Information Campaign .....................................................................27 Focus Area: Business Energy ................................................................................................28 How Are We Going To Get There? – Strategies ...................................................................32 Focus Area: Municipal Facilities ............................................................................................32 Focus Area: Residential Information Campaign .....................................................................36 Focus Area: Business Energy ................................................................................................40 How Are We Going To Stay On Course? – Monitoring and Reporting ...............................44 Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms Appendix 2: Workshop Process Overview Appendix 3: City of Edina Climate Change Goals presented on behalf of the EEC by Bill Sierks Appendix 4: 2015 City Greenhouse Gas Footprint Analysis and Reduction Concept presented by Ross Bintner Appendix 5: School Facilities Appendix 6: Focus Area Options Considered by the Planning Team Appendix 7: Detailed Focus Area Timelines Appendix 8: Partners in Energy Planning Memorandum of Understanding Appendix 9: Xcel Energy Demand Side Management Program Summaries Appendix 10: Detailed Program Participation and Associated Savings Appendix 11: List of Relevant Case Studies CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN *Using the EPA Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator (https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gas- equivalencies-calculator) i Executive Summary Our Vision: Edina’s residents, schools, businesses, and government will successfully reduce the community’s greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by the year 2025 through strategies and actions that are sustainable, practical, and measurable. How Will We Get There? The City will focus on these near-term priority areas to address electricity usage: Municipal Facilities Goals: •Short term: Within the next 18 months lower the City’s electricity greenhouse gas emissions by 7.5%, which is 13.4 million kWh, or 943 metric tons of CO2 equivalent.* Strategies: •Implement recommended energy use reduction projects from building study currently being conducted by CR-BPS •Negotiate renewable purchase for municipal electricity Residential Information Campaign Goals: •750 homes take energy savings actions each year, saving 562,000 kWh annually, or 395 metric tons of CO2 equivalent.* •Double the number of subscribers to Windsource®, and double the average subscription amount within 18 month, producing 8,505,000 kWh total, or 5,977 metric tons of CO2 equivalent.* Strategies: •Drive traffic to a City-operated web resource through City communications channels •Foster neighborhood-based outreach and leadership •Leverage outreach events for Windsource® sign-up •Assess and recommend policy options to support efficiency for Edina Business Energy Goals: •Reduce and/or off-set 2% of electricity usage annually, which is 7.3 million kWh, equivalent to 5,140 metric tons of CO2 equivalent.* Strategies: •Engage the top business energy users to take action on greenhouse gas through offsets and reductions •Target smaller businesses such as restaurants, retail, and others with recognition programs •Ongoing management and tracking •Assess and recommend policy options to support greenhouse gas reduction for Edina businesses CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN ii Playbook for Achieving Our Goals More details on actions and strategies may be found in the section “How Are We Going To Get There? –Strategies” starting on page 32. Note that these actions strategies primarily address electricity usage, and further plans will be made to address other sources of greenhouse gas emissions, including gas, transportation, water and waste water, and solid waste. Longer-term Actions (Oct. 2016 – Dec. 2017) Municipal: •Support implementation of prioritized projects •Prioritize and recommend adoption of renewable energy opportunities •Research funding Residential: •Launch City website presence •Plan and implement a social media campaign •Table at in-person events •Reach out to local community leaders •Develop multi-channel information campaign Business: •Identify top 100 prospects to reach out to first •Roll out large business outreach effort •Launch City website presence by end of 2016 Immediate Actions (July– Sept. 2016) Municipal: •Review building study recommendations •Prioritize projects based on energy savings potential and cost analysis •Meet with Xcel Energy to learn about renewable energy opportunities and programs for identified projects Residential: •Develop messaging •Identify in-person events •Identify and train volunteers •Leverage EEC members as neighborhood advocates •Recommend the City subsidize Home Energy Squad visits for low income and other households each year at $10,000 subsidy for 200 visits Business: •Start to identify 400 largest businesses and contacts and keep them in a database •Develop the “ask” for businesses Ongoing – Tracking Track progress quarterly for all focus areas, and report to the Energy and Environment Commission / City Council quarterly. Municipal: • Update City website quarterly with current information • Assist in development of City facilities case studies Residential: • Update City website quarterly • Check on goal progress quarterly • Evaluate effectiveness of messaging mid-way through the campaign Business: • Develop or identify a tool that will be used to measure results by March 2017 • Plan recognition events for businesses CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 1 Introduction The purpose of this plan is to outline tangible steps for the City of Edina to move the community towards its greenhouse gas goals, by increasing energy efficiency investments and the use of renewable electricity across the community. This plan focuses first and foremost on the electricity sector, and both informs the community about Edina’s current state of electricity use, and provides the necessary framework to continue working toward the City of Edina’s defined greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets through electricity oriented strategies. While natural gas is not explicitly analyzed or tracked in this plan, several plan strategies will also be leveraged to reduce Edina’s natural gas footprint, as detailed in section “How Are We Going To Get There? – Strategies” starting on page 32. Further plans will be made to specifically address other sources of greenhouse gas emissions, including gas, transportation, water and waste water, and solid waste. The 2013 metrics for Water, Travel, and Waste, taken from the Regional Indicators Initiative are shown in the section titled “Where Does the Community Stand? – Baseline Electricity Analysis.” In June of 2015, Edina’s City Council signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel Energy to participate in Partners in Energy (see Appendix 8). From October 2015 to April 2016, a 12-member Energy Action Team appointed by the Edina City Council participated in a series of workshops to develop the contents of this Energy Action Plan alongside representatives from Xcel Energy, Edina’s electricity provider. The team was comprised of Edina residents, members of Edina’s Energy and Environment Commission, City staff, and representatives from Edina School District and the Chamber of Commerce. The planning team reviewed electric energy data, prioritized areas of focus for Edina, and developed this Energy Action Plan. Although Edina’s greenhouse gas reduction goals span many sources of greenhouse gas emissions, the work this Energy Action Team has done has focused primarily on electricity, which makes up approximately 40% of Edina’s greenhouse gas emissions. The group would like to carry out this plan to help the community work toward short- to mid-term electric energy goals in conjunction with other strategies and actions targeting additional sources of greenhouse gas emissions, including natural gas. Included in this plan is detailed action planning for meeting short-term identified electric energy goals over an 18 month initial implementation period (July 2016-December 2017). The process was facilitated through Xcel Energy’s Partners in Energy offering for communities, and convened by the City of Edina and the Edina Energy and Environment Commission. The Photo by Gephart / CCBY CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 2 Energy and Environment Commission pursued Partners in Energy as a way to work toward meeting their existing greenhouse gas emissions targets and expand community participation in sustainability. The following plan provides an overview of the Edina community, the community’s baseline electricity use, documentation of the Partners in Energy planning process, a summary of priority focus areas identified by the Energy Action Team for implementation, and the near-term actions and strategies required to keep the implementation of this plan on track. The City of Edina – Community Background The City of Edina’s mission is to provide effective and valued services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. The City’s vision is to be the preeminent place for living, learning, raising families and doing business distinguished by: • a livable environment, • effective and valued city services, • a sound public infrastructure, • a balance of land uses, and • innovation. Edina is located in the first ring of suburbs within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, and is part of Hennepin County. Nearly 48,000 residents call Edina home. Edina is known for the high quality of life experienced by residents, and also houses a vibrant retail community, including the Southdale Shopping Center, Galleria Edina, and the 50th and France shopping district. Edina Facts and Figures County Hennepin Metro Area Location Directly west of Minneapolis Size 15.97 sq. miles Development 95% developed Population 49,596 in 2014 Population Density 1,460 housing units per sq. mile 3,103 inhabitants per sq. mile Southdale Mall Photo by Bobak Ha’Eri / CCBY CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 3 Demographics Nearly a quarter of the population is under 18, and 20% of the population is over 65. The average household size is 2.34, and most people have stayed in their homes for more than a year, with 88% of residents living in the same home as a year ago. Just over half the population, 53.4%, is female. Edina is one of the most affluent suburbs of Minneapolis with a median household income of $84,349. Between 2009 and 2013, four percent of Edina residents were living in poverty. Businesses & Employment Edina has a prominent business community and contains a mix of large and small retail, health care, corporate offices, and food businesses. Major Edina employers include: Fairview Southdale Hospital, Edina Public Schools, City of Edina, BI Worldwide, Regis Corporation, Barr Engineering, Lund Food Holdings, International Dairy Queen, Edina Realty, and FilmTec Corporation1. The Edina Chamber of Commerce has a membership of over 400 and holds monthly meetings and three annual events. Other large business organizations include Edina Rotary Club, with 160 members, and the 50th and France Business Association. Twenty-three and a half percent of people who work in Edina are Edina residents, higher than St. Louis Park (17.7%), and lower than Bloomington (29.9%) Education Edina has both public and private schools serving its students. All of the public schools fall under the Edina School District, ISD 273. There are approximately 8,500 students in Edina public schools, between six elementary schools, two middle schools, and one high school. In 2015, a referendum was passed for $124.9 million in funding for the purposes of updating learning spaces and enhancing building security at the district’s 1 City of Edina Website (http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=community-profile) A Cross Section of Edina’s Community Assets Highlights from community members’ feedback during the planning workshops • Good city management • Engaged community • Community reputation • Great schools • Shopping • Accessibility to metro area; location • Bike Trails 50th and France Photo by Meet Minneapolis/ CCBY CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 4 schools, while improving district infrastructure. Edina schools leverage “service learning,” a teaching strategy that engages students in addressing community issues or needs as part of their academic study. In Edina, part of this is manifested in a Passion Project and a May Term during high school. Almost a third of Edina households have children under the age of 18. There is a green team at the school called Project Earth. Almost 98% of Edina residents 18 or older have obtained a high school diploma. Sixty-seven percent have received a Bachelor’s degree or higher. Edina has four private schools. Housing The total number of housing units in Edina is 22,360, and 74.8% are owner occupied. Edina has a low homeowner vacancy rate of 2.3% and rental vacancy rate of 11.7%. Neighborhoods in Edina are recognized by the City through the voluntary formation of neighborhood associations. The City has a total of 35 neighborhoods, and nine are recognized neighborhood associations. Much of Edina’s housing stock was built between 1950 and 1979 (see below). The majority of Edina housing is detached single family homes (72%), although several multi-family buildings have been recently built or are in development. More than 100 home building permits were issued annually in 2014 and 2015. There is relatively high participation in Energy Star Homes, an energy efficiency program for new homes, with 46 participants within the past three years. Figure 1: Original Year of Construction for Edina’s Housing Stock Commitment to Sustainability Edina’s participation in Partners in Energy was preceded by several years of Edina City Hall Photo by Gephart / CCBY CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 5 sustainability work. The City of Edina established a citizen Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) in 2007 to promote sustainability initiatives and to advise the City Council. The commission is comprised of Edina residents and has several working groups and subcommittees which focused on specific sustainability topics. The commission creates a work plan annually, and the focus has been on carbon reduction. A presentation outlining Energy and Environment Commission activities, climate change goals, and recommendations to the City of Edina is included as Appendix 3. This presentation was shared with the Energy Action Team in Workshop 2. It will be essential to coordinate the Energy Action Plan so that it fits well with what the community is already doing. The City plans to leverage a new conservation and sustainability fund to add a full time position focused on sustainability within the City in the fall of 2016. Selected Citywide Sustainability Actions Related to Energy and Climate 2007 Became a participant in the Regional Indicators Initiative (RII) Established Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) Signed U.S. Mayor’s Climate Protection Agreement Became an ICLEI City for Climate Protection 2008 Included a chapter on Energy and Environment in the Comprehensive Plan 2009 Completed Greenhouse Gas Inventory under direction of the EEC 2010 Began benchmarking City Buildings Installed a closed loop geothermal system at the Public Works building with a minimum coefficient of performance of 3.3 2011 Entered into a Guaranteed Energy Savings Contract—12 City buildings audited and actions taken Joined GreenStep Cities (Currently Step 3) Installed solar panel system on the roof of City Hall 2012-2016 Variety of LED lighting retrofits at City Hall, Public Works, Edinborough Park, 50th and France Ramps, and others. A core priority of the City and the EEC has been to lead by example by operating City facilities sustainably The City of Edina utilizes B3 benchmarking data to track energy use for heating and cooling in public facilities, most buildings also have and centralized HVAC control system that allow operators the ability to track and control on a daily basis. B3 data is entered for all municipal buildings and is kept current by the Finance department. Trends and energy savings opportunities are reviewed and an annual summary is provided to the Energy and Environment Commission. In 2011, the City contracted with McKinstry under the Guaranteed Energy Savings Program. Under the contract, the 12 largest municipal facilities were audited. This energy audit identified and implemented the following efficiency improvements: building envelope insulation, water CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 6 conservation, and interior lighting retrofits. This retrofit project included 11 separate City buildings. The performance contract project was projected to reduce energy use by over 540,000 kWh and 19,600 therms of gas on an annual basis, reduce the City’s carbon footprint by 540 metric tons of CO2 annually, and qualified for a guaranteed annual savings of approximately $54,000. Additionally, the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan outlines the following goals (Chapter 10): • GHG reduction goal: 15% reduction by 2015, 25% reduction by 2025, 80% reduction by 2050. • Develop a local action plan. The basis for setting the greenhouse gas reduction level was set by state policy established in the 2007 Next Generation Energy Act. The state goal in statute is to reduce emissions 30% by 2025, not 25%, and this discrepancy was addressed through this planning process. Edina’s energy work for local business includes the Edina Emerald City Energy Program (EEEP), which includes financing, promotion of efficiency and renewable energy, and recognition of businesses. Through this program, Edina was the first local government to launch a property assessed clean energy (PACE) service to allow commercial properties to repay energy loans using an assessment on their local property taxes. EEEP won the 2012 Environmental Initiative award for energy and climate protection. Edina joined ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) in 2007, and completed a baseline Greenhouse Gas Inventory in 2009. The inventory calculated that 55% of Edina’s CO2 output on 2007 resulted from a combination of residential electrical consumption and commercial and industrial electrical consumption. Other factors measured included: residential, commercial, and industrial natural gas usage; other service and public authority electrical usage; public streets and highway lighting electrical usage; and Edina vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Additionally, the Energy and Environment Commission worked closely with Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy to bring the Home Energy Squad Enhanced (HES) program to residents. The City of Edina has bought down the cost of the visit to $50 for residents, making the program affordable for more households. The program is promoted through the EEC's Education & Outreach Working Group with door hangers and participation in the annual 4th of July parade and other community outreach. Home Energy Squad Enhanced CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 7 Edina recently supported renewable development by working with the Metropolitan Council and creating a model lease for Community Solar Gardens (CSG) through participation in a solar power purchase initiative through the Metropolitan Council and has signed contracts with two developers for multiple megawatts of installation. Both the Energy and Environment Commission and the City Council supported this endeavor. Edina is slated to be the first city to host a rooftop lease, and is making all bid documents available for other public agencies to use. Additionally, the City established a Conservation and Sustainability fund in late 2015, leveraging a utility tax, in part to add a City staff position focused on conservation and energy activities. It is anticipated that this staff member will be hired in summer of 2016, and play a significant role in implementing this action plan. Community Communications and Outreach Engaging the community is critical to reaching this plan’s goals. Below are some of the ways that Edina’s residents and businesses currently receive information. These communication channels will be helpful during implementation efforts. The City has a robust communications staff which will be able to support implementation of this plan, and also has the capacity to produce videos. Edina hosts a variety of annual events and structured outreach opportunities that could bring program awareness to residents and businesses. The City uses a variety of social media platforms to communicate with residents. Their portfolio includes: Facebook, Foursquare, Blog, Twitter, and YouTube. The City of Edina website is used by residents and businesses to look up information. Additional channels are listed below: About Town: A quarterly publication of the City of Edina produced to keep Edina residents informed of new activities and programs that are important to them. Articles of interest about citizens and community history are included as well. The magazine is distributed to all households in the City and most businesses, with a total circulation of 25,000. City Extra: An email subscription that provides residents with updates from City Hall, city departments, and city facilities. Annual Events in Edina • Winter Ice Festival • Taste of Edina • Edina Dialogue Forum • Edina Art Fair • Parade of Boats • Annual Independence Day Parade and Fireworks • Night to Unite • Lighthouse Night • Fall into the Arts Festival • Barnyard Boogie • Indoor Music in the Park • Pumpkin Festival • Outdoor Concerts, Entertainment, and Movies in the Park CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 8 Edition Edina: A newsletter summarizing news of the City of Edina, based on the City Council's six strategic priorities: infrastructure, commercial and mixed-use redevelopment, workforce, communication and engagement, community vision and aviation noise. Edina to Go: A smartphone app to facilitate communication with the City. Friday Report: A weekly Friday Report for the City Council about current City operations and activities, prepared by the City Manager. It previews matters that will concern Council Members in the near future. SunCurrent: A newspaper delivered weekly to Edina’s residents. Results from the 2013 Edina Residential Survey show that the top principal information sources for residents about city government and its activities were the local newspaper (37%), the City newsletter (35%), and the City website (12%).2 Xcel Energy Partners in Energy Xcel Energy is the electricity service provider for Edina residents and businesses. Partners in Energy is an offering developed for Xcel Energy communities in Minnesota and Colorado that supports communities in the development and implementation of a customized energy action plan. The service was launched in 2014, and Edina was chosen as the fifth Minnesota community to participate. Other Minnesota communities at the time of this writing are the Lake Street/Midtown Greenway Corridor in Minneapolis, the Cities of Maplewood, Red Wing, and St. Louis Park, and Ramsey County’s Parks and Recreation Department. There are currently six Colorado communities participating. The offering has a history of working with communities to establish plans that reduce energy use and promote renewables that drive cost savings and greenhouse gas emissions. The objective of the Partners in Energy planning process is to allow communities to develop actionable plans that advance their goals while being supported by Xcel Energy’s technical expertise, facilitation process, and program knowledge. After six months of planning, Xcel Energy continues to support partnering communities by providing plan implementation assistance over the course of 18 months. 2http://edinamn.gov/corecode/uploads/document/uploaded_pdfs/corecode_edina/2013%20Edina%20Surv ey%20Results_62.pdf Edina's Exchange Communities CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 9 In addition to planning workshops, communities can participate in joint learning opportunities with three to five other Partners in Energy communities, forming an “Exchange.” Exchanges meet for office hour calls, webinars, and peer-to-peer conversations developed around topics that support planning and implementation tasks. The goal of these interactions is to allow for collaboration between communities and access to experts in the field. Energy Action Team The City of Edina worked to ensure a range of Energy Action Team members, and issued an open call for applications on the City’s Facebook page, website, and in the Sun Current. Volunteers were asked to commit to attending planning workshops, have an interest in energy and related topics, and the ability to represent and educate the community. In addition to four at-large citizen members, three Energy and Environment Commission members, two City staff members, one Chamber of Commerce appointed member, and one School District appointed member were solicited. The City Council reviewed applications and made appointments on September 1, 2015. Edina's Energy Action Team Front Row: Richard Manser, Jenny Edwards, Sarah Klauer Middle Row: Tami Gunderzik, Bill Sierks, Kevin Schwain, Curt Johanson, Sarah Zarrin, Carolyn Jackson, Rozy Eastaugh, Yvonne Pfeifer Back Row: Ross Bintner, Kyle Sawyer, Roy Jenson, Rick Murphy, Kevin Staunton CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 10 Edina’s Energy Action Team City of Edina a) Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer, City of Edina b) Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director, City of Edina c) Kevin Staunton, City Council Member, City of Edina Energy and Environment Commission d) Bill Sierks e) Richard Manser f) Sarah Zarrin Business and Organizations g) Rick Murphy, Chamber of Commerce h) Curt Johanson, Edina School District Residents i) Carolyn Jackson (appointed to EEC in 2016) j) Marshall Silberstein k) Roy Jenson l) Rozy Eastaugh Xcel Energy Representatives m) Tami Gunderzik, Partners in Energy Program Manager n) Yvonne Pfeifer, DSM Community Manager o) Kevin Schwain, Product Strategy and Development Director, Edina Resident p) Michelle Swanson, Community and Local Government Relations Manager, Edina Resident q) Jenny Edwards, Partners in Energy Facilitator r) Sarah Klauer, Partners in Energy Facilitator s) Emma Struss, Partners in Energy Facilitator Workshop Guests a) Scott Neal, City Manager, City of Edina (Workshop 1) b) M. Sarah Schaffer, Senior Administrator of Energy Efficiency Programs, CenterPoint Energy (Workshop 2) CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 11 At the beginning of the planning process, Energy Action Team members filled out a welcome survey. The survey showed that over half of team members had lived in Edina for more than 10 years, with 9% living in Edina for 2-5 years and 9% living in Edina 0-2 years. Twenty-seven percent of the team did not live in Edina. Fifty-four percent of the team worked in Edina, and 82% of the team considered energy as part of their job. The team’s energy literacy was split between advanced (46%), intermediate (27%), and beginner (27%). Planning Process The content of this plan is derived heavily from a series of five planning workshops. Xcel Energy’s role in the planning process was to facilitate the workshops, provide electricity use data, program participation data, and other technical data as available, to advise the community on effective strategies and actions, and to produce this energy action plan based upon the community’s input and feedback. A central emphasis throughout the process is community ownership of the energy plan, which requires active participation and broad input. The Energy Action Team met for the first time in October of 2015 and continued meeting via workshops and phone calls through May 2016. The primary planning objectives were to develop a unifying vision for Edina’s energy future, to share information on the existing activities within the community, to develop priority focus areas for near- term implementation, and to work through detail on strategies, goals, and the initial work plan during implementation. A summary of each of the five in- person workshops is listed on the following pages, and additional information is located in Appendix 2. The workshops were led by community facilitators from the Center for Energy and Environment and attended by Xcel Energy staff. An overview of the major activities at each workshop is included on the following page. A more detailed overview of each workshop can be found as Appendix 2. Xcel Energy’s Partners in Energy Planning Process CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 12 Partners in Energy Workshop Process Workshop 1 October 14, 2015 • Team introductions and Partners In Energy process overview • Review of baseline energy data & past energy initiatives • Discussion of community assets and energy vision Workshop 2 December 15, 2015 • Review of Workshop 1 and team introductions • Presentation by the Energy and Environment Commission • Review of Xcel Energy’s sustainability initiatives • Review of data pertaining to residential and business energy use • Discussion and brainstorm of focus areas Workshop 3 January 21, 2016 • Welcome and recap of Workshop 2 • Prioritization and selection of focus areas • Small groups work on draft goals and strategies for each selected focus area Workshop 4 February 23, 2016 • Welcome and review of selected focus areas, adding a business focus area • Review data on GHG emissions and reduction impact • Presentation on City facilities and opportunities • Small groups work on strategies and goals for each selected focus area Workshop 5 April 4, 2016 • Welcome and review of activity that has taken place between Workshops 4 and 5. • Windsource® focus area is moved to the residential and business focus areas • Small groups work to refine strategies and place actions on timelines. Post-Workshop 5 Calls April 29, May 6 2016 • Small groups discussed detailed action planning for each focus area CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 13 Where Does the Community Stand? – Baseline Electricity Analysis An early step in the Partners in Energy planning process was to review the current electricity use in the city of Edina.3 The Xcel Energy project team calculated community electricity statistics from the past three years of available data (2012-2014) to help the planning team understand how and where electricity is currently used in the community.4 The baseline year for the community’s overall energy goal is 2009, however the electricity data here shows three years of historical use and program participation. The data show that 2012 electricity greenhouse gas emissions were 10% below 2009 electricity greenhouse gas emissions. In 2014, the community used a total of 584 million kWh of electricity. Figure 2 shows the breakdown of that electricity use by residential homes, commercial and industrial businesses, municipal, and public school properties. Commercial and industrial use accounted for 60% of the community total, residential use was 34%, and municipal and school operations were 5%. The total energy-related electricity expenditures in 2014 were $59.2 million (not including taxes, franchise fees, or other costs). Figure 2: Segmented Community-Wide Electricity Use in 2014 (kWh) 3 Xcel Energy is the electricity service provider in Edina; natural gas service is provided by CenterPoint Energy. 4All energy data presented through this process was developed for planning purposes, and therefore it may contain some variation from data obtained through other sources. All energy and program data presented here complies with Xcel Energy’s 15x15 data privacy rules (all summary statistics must contain at least 15 entities, and no single entity can be responsible for more than 15 percent of the total or they will be removed from the summary). In Edina, no entities were removed from these summary statistics. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 14 Xcel Energy served 23,393 total premises in Edina in 2014.5 Ninety-one percent of those premises are residential, while commercial and industrial buildings (including schools and municipal properties) comprised 9% of the total number of premises. Figure 3: Edina Community-wide Electricity Use in 2014 Figure 4 shows Edina’s electricity use compared to previous Minnesota Partners in Energy communities, for a sense of scale and comparison. Note that St. Louis Park and Edina show the most recent year of data, 2014, while the other communities show 2013 annual data. Partners in Energy Community Xcel Energy Fuels Served Total Residential GWh Residential Premises Total Commercial – Industrial GWh Commercial- Industrial Premises Lake Street Corridor, Minneapolis (2013) E 210 43,000 432 1,400 Maplewood (2013) E, G 119 15,192 201 1,503 Red Wing (2013) E, G 58 6,893 112 1,049 St Louis Park (2014) E 144 22,769 333 2,156 Edina (2014) E 201 21,277 384 2,116 Figure 4: Partners in Energy Community Electricity Use Compared 5 A premise is a unique identifier for the location of electricity or natural gas service. In most cases, it is a facility location. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 15 Another point of community-wide comparison is offered through the Regional Indicators Initiative6 (RII), which inventories energy, potable water, travel, waste, and greenhouse gas emissions for Minnesota cities. Edina has been tracking community energy use through RII since 2007, for both natural gas and electricity. Figure 5 shows that Edina’s energy use is higher than some nearby cities, including St. Louis Park, but lower than Bloomington. Figure 5: Regional Indicators Initiative Energy Comparison 2013 (MMBtu) In addition to looking at the community’s energy usage in comparison to nearby cities, the team looked at projections around Xcel Energy’s electricity supply. The carbon intensity of Xcel Energy’s electricity supply will significantly impact greenhouse gas reductions in the electricity sector. Current unofficial projections of the electricity grid are based on Xcel Energy’s filing with the Minnesota State Public Utilities Commission, dated October 2, 2015, which proposed a schedule for fuel conversion of existing coal power generation facilities. Based on this proposed plan, Xcel Energy’s carbon intensity is projected to decrease 35% between 2012 and 2025, and 42% from 2009, which is Edina’s baseline for greenhouse gas emissions reduction. Figure 6 shows the impact of Xcel Energy’s energy supply mix projections on greenhouse gas reductions in the electricity sector. 6 More information on the Regional Indicators Initiative website (Minnesota.uli.org/initiatives/environment/regional-indicators-initiative/) CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 16 Figure 6: Electricity Grid Projections (dark blue) based on the filing with MN PUC on October 2, 2015 Residential Electricity Use Further segmentation of the residential sector shows how household use is distributed across the community. In the residential sector, the top 20% of electricity users consume 45% of Edina’s residential electricity. This data shows that higher impacts may be achieved in targeting high usage homes, and that the top 20% of households use more electricity than the bottom 60% of users combined. In targeting residential home electricity usage, age of housing stock can be a factor. Newer homes have improved building shells and more efficient appliances; however older homes may be smaller and cool during the summer in zones through window air conditioning units, rather than through a central air system. Many of Edina’s homes were built from 1950-1979. 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 Built 1939 or earlier Built 1940 to 1949 Built 1950 to 1959 Built 1960 to 1969 Built 1970 to 1979 Built 1980 to 1989 Built 1990 to 1999 Built 2000 to 2009 Built 2010 or later Nu m b e r o f H o m e s Figure 7: Residential Electricity Use Figure 8: Age of Residential Housing Stock Top 20% 45% 2nd 24% 3rd 16% 4th 10% Lowest 20% 5% CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 17 In 2014, there were 21,288 residential premises in Edina, and the average residential electricity use was 9,430 kWh/year. Figure 9 shows a geographic breakdown of Edina’s average residential premise electric use by neighborhood. The neighborhoods with the lowest average consumption are Cahill and Pentagon Park, and the neighborhoods with the highest average consumption were Rolling Green and Hilldale. By considering this data, the team was able to determine whether a geographically oriented strategy would be a priority. Figure 9: Residential Electricity Use Figure 10 shows the total residential use by the top 15 electricity using neighborhoods in ranked order. Parkwood Knolls had the highest energy usage in total by a significant lead, followed by Country Club, Countryside, Morningside, and Lake Cornelia. This total use by neighborhood reflects the total number of residential properties, as well as the average use by home, and differs from the average consumption per premise shown above. This information contributed to the consideration of a neighborhood-oriented or geographically oriented strategy by the Energy Action Team. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 18 Figure 10: Top 15 Neighborhood Total kWh Usage 2014 Residential Program Participation Another component of the community baseline is how much residents have participated in conservation or renewable energy programs, and which programs have been most popular. Average participation by neighborhood is shown in Figure 11. Neighborhoods with the highest rates of participation were Lake Cornelia, Sunny Slope, Rolling Green, and Normandale Park, which all had program participation rates between 35% and 40%. Figure 11: Residential Program Participation Benchmarked to Population CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 19 Xcel Energy’s residential conservation programs with the highest customer participation over the past three years are shown below, by participation count. When one includes all residential programs (beyond these top 4), energy efficiency saved residential customers the equivalent of 0.3% of their annual electricity use. Figure 12: Residential Energy Efficiency Program Participation Windsource® is a renewable energy program offered by Xcel Energy, where residents and businesses voluntarily pay a premium to subscribe to wind power to cover their electric use. These subscriptions count above and beyond any planned wind energy projects.7 Subscribers can choose to subscribe in blocks of 100 kWh, or cover their entire household usage. In 2014, the average cost for one 100 kWh block was an additional $0.68 over the retail rate. Six- hundred and seventy five households and eight businesses currently participate in Windsource®. Almost half of residential Windsource® subscribers subscribe to just one 100 kWh block. 7 Windsource® is therefore in addition to any projects that being developed to meet Minnesota’s renewable portfolio standard. Xcel Energy will retire the Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) for the Windsource® customer. 100 kWh 48% 200 kWh 12% 300-500 kWh 15% > 600 kWh 5% Full Subscription 20% Figure 13: Residential Windsource® Subscription Amount CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 20 In addition, eight households participated in Xcel Energy’s Solar*Rewards programs, which offers incentives and rebates for installation of photovoltaic (PV) solar panels. Detailed information on program participation and associated savings is included in Appendix 10, and specific program descriptions can be found in Appendix 9. Business Electricity Use In the business sector, the top 20% of commercial energy users consume 87% of Edina’s commercial electricity use, shown in Figure 14. The number of businesses included in the top 20% of users is 392. Factors that may contribute to the highest 20% of users consuming a disproportionate amount of electricity could include business sector and business size. In general, the sectors with the highest electricity consumption are: food service, inpatient health care, food sales, enclosed and strip malls, and lodging.8 This information highlights the potential of targeting the top 20% of business users over small businesses. Figure 14: Business Electricity Use The commercial efficiency programs with the highest customer participation over the past three years are shown in Figure 15. Participation in all commercial efficiency programs combined saves 1.8% of electric use by Edina businesses annually. 8 From the U.S. Energy Information Administration Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Survey 87% 8% 5% Top 20% of all businesses Next 20% of all businesses Lowest 60% of all businesses CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 21 Figure 15: Business Program Participation In the past three years, 11 businesses participated in Solar*Rewards programs. Detailed information on business program participation is included in Appendix 10. While many of the programs for the largest/industrial customers have the highest average savings per participant, the programs that had the most participation were Small Business Lighting, Lighting Efficiency, Cooling Efficiency, and Motor Efficiency. City Electricity Use and Data Together, municipal facilities and school district facilities contribute 5% of community wide electricity use. City facilities consumed 17.9 million kWh in 2014, while School District facilities consumed 13.8 million kWh. Both the City of Edina and Edina Public School District signed data privacy waivers enabling public sharing of facilities electricity data for this planning project. Energy use for the 20 highest using municipal facilities has been tracked through the B3 benchmarking program as part of Edina’s participation in GreenStep Cities. The Partners in Energy planning process allowed for a synthesis with Xcel Energy electricity data to update existing data and expand tracking to all municipal facilities. Electricity usage for the City’s top 20 facilities for the year ending in October 2015 is show in Figure 16. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 22 Figure 16: Top 20 City Facilities Electricity Usage In addition, Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer, prepared a series of data to inform strategies for reducing City greenhouse gas emissions. The results estimate how electricity use in municipal facilities compares to other sources of greenhouse gas emissions, and against budget expenditures, though the results were issued with a data quality caveat.9 A wedge diagram showing the impact of proposed strategies on City greenhouse gas emissions is shown in Figure 17. The complete assessment can be found as Appendix 4. This information informed decisions about how to prioritize strategies targeting municipal greenhouse gas emissions. Mr. Bintner used a 2015 budget spreadsheet provided by the City finance department and analyzed it to group expenses and convert them to total dollar values, which were converted into units of material or energy, or directly translated to GHG using sources including the International Local Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Protocol. 9 Mr. Bintner explained to the planning team: “The “concept” level of detail is important to note, as I have not been trained to perform GHG analysis. In performing this analysis I worked with planning team member Kyle Sawyer, and Michael Orange with Orange Environmental to translate 2015 City of Edina expenses data into approximate GHG emissions. Mr. Orange has conducted GHG assessments and politely emphasizes my lack of training when asked! In addition to GHG, I also attempted to summarize other notable environmental footprint not directly related to energy, such as water and land to demonstrate the concept of tradeoffs in City operations.” CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 23 Figure 17: Conceptual Diagram Showing Impact of Proposed Actions Prepared by Ross Bintner School District Electricity Use and Sustainability The Edina Public School District has completed a variety of sustainable and energy saving projects. Several strategies are incorporated into each school’s mechanical design, and Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance program has been utilized by the District to develop utility rebate incentives. Specifics on the sustainable strategies designed for the Edina Public Schools Next Generation Facilities Plan currently in progress with Wold Architects and Engineers and Kraus-Anderson Construction may be found in Appendix 5. The District-wide Go Green committee has implemented several initiatives. As a group, the committee is finding ways to motivate students and help them be aware of their carbon footprint. The committee meets once a month to discuss ways to help the schools and leverage parent and staff volunteers to support sustainability, and reports to District staff on a monthly basis. The committee actively supports initiatives coming out of high school and middle school green groups. The committee received a grant from Hennepin County to purchase and implement waste sorting stations at all elementary schools and to hire staff to monitor lunchroom waste sorting. Through this, staff and students are being educated to sort waste responsibly. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 24 2013 Data on Other Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sectors While this plan focuses on electricity, the community would also like to address other greenhouse gas contributors. Information taken from the Regional Indicators Initiative is shown here to provide some context around the community’s non-electric goals. In 2013 Edina had: • 500,897,300 Vehicle Miles Traveled • 3,865,778 BTUs of Natural Gas • 54,980.51 Tons of Solid Waste • 748,497,250 Gallons of Water Used by Businesses • 1,655,865,000 Gallons of Water Used by Residents The following table shows these sectors of greenhouse gas emissions as Metric Tons of CO2 emissions. Non-Electricity Greenhouse Gas Emissions in 2013 CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 25 Where is Edina Headed? – Edina’s Energy Vision, Focus Areas, and Goals A clearly articulated, transparent, and shared energy vision serves the purpose of guiding decisions about how to prioritize community resources, including the selection of focus areas, goals, and strategies for achieving those goals. At the beginning of the planning process, participants shared their individual visions for what Edina’s energy future could be, and iterated on a unified vision to guide the process. Essential to the vision statement is the pre- established greenhouse gas emissions reduction goal, established by the City of Edina and the Energy and Environment Commission. The targeted greenhouse gas emissions reduction percentage has been updated by the Energy Action Team to reflect the State of Minnesota energy conservation goals. The results of that effort are the vision statement below, with the reduction goal targeted over a 2009 baseline. Edina’s Community Energy Vision Edina’s residents, schools, businesses, and government will successfully reduce the community’s greenhouse gas emissions by 30% by the year 2025, through strategies and actions that are sustainable, practical, and measurable. Focus Areas This vision statement guided the Energy Action Team in the development of the focus areas, strategies and short term goals. Focus areas are Edina’s key priorities under which goals and strategies of the plan are organized. To determine which focus areas would best fit the Edina community, the planning team reviewed opportunities and data within each major sector: municipal, residential, and commercial. Details on the opportunities the planning team explored are included as Appendix 6. Energy Vision Brainstorm and Direction CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 26 Five focus areas originally emerged out of the planning process: Schools and Service Learning, City Facilities, a Residential Information Campaign, Residential Windsource®, and Business Energy Efficiency. These focus areas were selected by the Energy Action Team based on areas that supported Edina’s energy vision, that team members were personally excited to work on, and had strong potential for short term impact. The Schools and Service Learning focus area was selected because the schools are a valued asset in Edina, and the group felt it was important to start energy education at a young age. As the group explored options, they were sensitive to the opportunity to partner with the school district, and didn’t want to overreach in terms of asking for specific actions. Between the fourth and fifth workshop, the group decided to shift away from Schools and Service learning as a focus area, but rather to use Partners in Energy as an opportunity to connect with the school district and invite them to partner on energy initiatives. The team wants to recognize the work the school district is already doing and planning to do to reduce energy usage and engage students in sustainability education. Detailed information on energy projects within the schools can be found in Appendix 5. Renewable energy subscriptions emerged as the group reviewed available programs, and the group is interested in leveraging the low consumer price point, as well as direct impact on reduction of GHG. The group initially targeted Residential Windsource® as a focus area, and decided in the fifth workshop to combine the strategies and messaging in this focus area with the Residential Information Campaign. The work the group did on Residential Windsource® is reflected in the goals, actions, and strategies of the Residential Information Campaign. Further information on the three focus areas for near-term action follows: Municipal Facilities, a Residential Information Campaign, and increasing Business Energy Efficiency and Renewables. The Energy Action Team voting on focus areas in Workshop 3 CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 27 Focus Area: Municipal Facilities This focus area is a continued commitment to demonstrating leadership in City operations when asking businesses and residents to complete energy conservation and renewable energy actions. A series of building studies are currently in progress through CR-BPS, and the results of those studies will significantly impact how this focus area moves forward. The City’s Capital Improvement Plan is also currently in progress for the next two years, which will include budgets for capital improvement projects, including for City facilities. Beyond the scope of this plan, other strategies will support other sources of City greenhouse gas emissions, including strategies addressing transportation and natural gas use. City facilities and operations consume about 6% of total community electricity use. The greenhouse has reduction strategies will be embedded in City processes and plans, and not treated as stand- alone efforts. Goals: • Long term: Reduce the City’s greenhouse gas emissions 30% by 2025 from a 2012 baseline. • Short term: Within the next 18 months lower the City’s electricity greenhouse gas emissions by 7.5% Seven and a half percent of the City’s electricity usage is 13.4 million kWh, which is equivalent to 943 metric tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent, using the EPA’s greenhouse gas equivalencies calculator. Focus Area: Residential Information Campaign The Energy Action Team prioritized reaching out to Edina residents because this strategy would be impactful and achievable in the short term. The planning group also wanted to leverage the neighborhood residential energy data shared during planning, and the experience planning team members had sharing their own energy use, to motivate other residents. The Edina community is strong, with lots of involved families and a general sense of community pride. The team feels that residents don’t realize the impact they can have by doing some fundamental and easy things in their homes. This focus area leverages the sophisticated communications channels the City of Edina already has in place, as well as the peer-to-peer network of the Energy and Environment Commission. Residential energy use composes 34% of Edina’s overall electricity use. The goals outlined below would result in 175 tonnes of reduced carbon emissions by 2025 through conservation CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 28 and 2,665 tonnes of reduced carbon emissions by 2025 through the utilization of renewable energy. Goals: • 750 homes take energy savings actions each year. • Double the number of subscribers to Windsource®, and double the average subscription amount within 18 months. Currently, the average number of residential rebates filed annually is 715. Given the priority actions identified in the strategies, described below, achieving this goal of 750 additional actions annually will more than double the electricity savings from conservation programs, saving 562,000 kWh per year. There was an average of 675 residential subscribers to Windsource in 2015, with an average subscription amount of 4,200 kWh annually, or 350 kWh per month. The Energy Action Team would like to leverage learnings from similar campaigns and best practices. For outreach, there are several important factors: • The audience the message is trying to reach, and their experiences • The clear ask that the recipient of the message should take • The reason the recipient of the message will care • The channels which are best suited to reaching the target audience Throughout implementation of this focus area, special efforts will be made to communicate how people benefit from the impact of their energy efficiency, conservation, and renewable energy actions, including saving money, helping to reduce CO2 emissions, and reducing energy usage. A list of relevant case studies is located in Appendix 11. As the team works to implement this plan, they will review further best actions and case studies. Focus Area: Business Energy Businesses are responsible for 66% of Edina’s electricity usage. The top 20% of business comprise 87% of total business energy usage. Given this data, the Energy Action Team felt it was important to target such a large portion of overall usage. A key idea behind this focus area is to leverage existing resources to promote energy savings actions and to recognize businesses in the community that are leaders in energy efficiency and renewable energy. Knowing that businesses vary greatly in how they use energy, the group has identified a need for customized messaging to reach businesses in the most impactful way. In order for this focus area to be successful, the messaging will need to convey the business case for greenhouse gas reduction. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 29 Goals: • Reduce and/or off-set through renewable energy 2% of electricity usage annually. Over the past three years, businesses have saved 1.8% of their energy usage on an annual basis. This number is averaged between the past three years, but overall conservation in the business sector has been trending down. The 2% goal is aggressive, and will compound year over year to meaningfully impact progress toward the City’s 30% greenhouse gas reduction goal, in combination with the other strategies and the decarbonization of the electricity grid. This focus area will leverage the largest businesses to act as leaders in the energy space by taking actions and by recognizing them. Two percent of annual business usage is 7.3 million kWh, equivalent to 5,140 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. Additionally, education sector facilities are included in this business oriented focus area. The team will continue to communicate with the school facilities staff to track energy efficiency and renewable energy projects, highlighting them as case studies when appropriate. The Energy Action Team would like to leverage learnings from similar campaigns and best practices. The same four key components that are important for residential outreach are important for business outreach. The group would like to highlight a call for leadership and energy efficiency actions that will save businesses money in the long term. Additionally, the group will work to build resident support of businesses that demonstrate a commitment to energy efficiency and renewable energy. A list of relevant case studies is located in Appendix 11. As the team works to implement this plan, they will review further best actions and case studies. Impact of Focus Area Goals on kWh The following graph shows the impact of each focus area’s goals in comparison to baseline energy efficiency and renewable subscription activity. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 30 Impact of Energy Action Plan Goals on Carbon Reduction The following illustration shows how the Partners in Energy goals and the projected carbon- intensity of the regional electricity grid will help achieve Edina’s community wide greenhouse gas targets. Carbon intensity trends used are based on the most recent projections of Xcel Energy’s upper Midwest electricity grid, as shared above.10 Partners in Energy strategies are focused on goals for the next 18 months, and this illustration projects continued activity to 2025, assuming a continuation of activity at an intensity of 66%. Additional assumptions are detailed below. The data in the graph below differs from the data provided in the Regional Indicators Initiative in that it includes gas, electricity, and transportation, and not “waste” and “others” categories.11 • Electricity use from 2009-2011 is taken from the Regional Indicators Initiative; natural gas and transportation GHGs from 2009 – 2013 are taken from the Regional Indicators Initiative. • Electricity use from 2012-2014 is calculated using Xcel Energy community wide electricity data from Partners in Energy. • The business as usual (BAU) assumptions for electricity assume that annual baseline growth occurs at 1.5% annually in the residential and commercial sectors, and that in addition, baseline energy savings from ongoing conservation programs will occur, matching the average rate from 2012- 2014. These two assumptions result in a net zero change to baseline additions. • Natural gas and transportation is projected flat from 2013 levels for illustrative purposes, although there are likely planned reductions in those sectors. 10 These projections are taken from Xcel Energy’s Integrated Resource Plan dated October 2, 2015. 11 In the Regional Indicators Initiative data, these sections should make up about 747,000 mtCO2e. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 31 CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 32 How Are We Going To Get There? – Strategies This section outlines in more detail the specific strategies that will meet the goals of each focus area. The Energy Action Team developed these strategies by examining the state of current energy use and program activity, brainstorming and prioritizing possible actions that draw on core community strengths, and assessing the likelihood that strategies will meet identified goals. The Energy Action Team spent several sessions revising strategies with technical input from the Xcel Energy team. Each focus area identified has its own action plan that identifies responsible parties, outlines implementation steps and a timeline, identifies partners or resources, and assigns metrics for tracking progress. This plan focuses on actions over the next 18 months. More detailed workplans will be developed for each focus area by the implementation workgroups, which may include more detailed goals tailored to each action. Members of the Energy Action Team who developed this plan, as well as other community members, have the opportunity to be involved with implementation through joining Energy and Environment Commission work groups dedicated Municipal, Residential, and Business energy, including work on gas usage reduction, solid waste reduction, and water usage reduction. A quarterly newsletter with update on progress in the electricity sector and volunteer opportunities will be distributed. Focus Area: Municipal Facilities Two key strategies support the Municipal Facilities focus area, which will be championed by the new Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) Staff member. The ongoing actions for this focus area will be heavily dependent on the outcomes from the municipal building study recommendations. This section outlines actions that will take place in the first few months of implementation with the expectation that ongoing actions will be determined by the CAS Staff member and City staff. MUNICIPAL FACILITIES OVERVIEW Goals • Short term: Within the next 18 months lower the City’s electricity greenhouse gas emissions by 7.5%, which is 13.4 million kWh, or 943 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. • Long term: Reduce the City’s greenhouse gas emissions by 30% from a 2012 baseline by 2025. Strategy: Implement recommended energy use reduction projects from building study Actions: • Prioritize recommendations based on greenhouse gas reduction and cost analysis • Meet with Xcel Energy to review building study reports and evaluate opportunities for rebates and conservation programs • Support implementation of projects CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 33 currently being conducted by CR- BPS Leadership: CAS Support Staff • Review supplemental funding options for project implementation • Track electricity and greenhouse gas impact of projects • Communicate greenhouse gas impacts to broader community through City communications channels • Evaluate use of projects as case studies for business programs • Integrate greenhouse gas reduction principles on maintenance program for existing facilities • Incorporate greenhouse gas considerations on capital purchases • Look into research opportunities with education organizations • Assist with development of business case for GHG reduction options • Review current City policy and propose changes to support energy use and greenhouse gas reductions Strategy: Negotiate renewable purchase for municipal electricity Leadership: CAS Support Staff Actions: • Coordinate with Xcel Energy to evaluate opportunities, including Windsource® and Renewable Connect • Continue to evaluate solar • Research supplemental funding opportunities • Draft three possible levels of participation • Present options to EEC and City Council • Communicate impact of any renewable purchase to broader community through City communications channels Measuring Success Measure progress every six months using electricity data provided by Xcel Energy OR use B3 data. Quarterly reports to EEC and City Council. TEAM: Community Lead Lead: CAS Staff Team: Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer, Tim Barnes, Facilities Manager, Jennifer Bennerotte, City Communications, EEC Energy Work Group Community Partners EEC, City Council, City Communications Staff Outreach and Communication Channels • Regular update presentations at EEC • Potential project case studies distributed and developed by the Business Focus Area • Communicate project progress to the community through on-site signage and City website Xcel Energy Support Provide information on relevant rebates and programs, work with City to evaluate renewable energy opportunities, provide electricity data to track progress every six months. KEY ROLES FOR MUNICIPAL FOCUS AREA Implement recommended projects from building study EEC Working Group: Coordinate with City Staff for updates, provide feedback, coordinate messaging of case studies with other EEC work groups City Staff: Review building study report and coordinate with Facilities Manager and Xcel Energy to prioritize projects for implementation, CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 34 research outside funding opportunities and pursue them, ongoing role based on results of building study, research opportunities to partner with education organizations, help develop the business case for GHG reduction options, train City staff (beyond the CAS staff) on energy efficiency and the impacts of their actions, reach out to receive lessons learned from other cities Xcel Energy: Meet with City Staff to offer perspective on prioritizing projects based on the building study report and connect with relevant program opportunities Negotiate renewable purchase for municipal electricity EEC Working Group: Advocate for renewable purchase, offer feedback, coordinate messaging of case studies with other EEC work groups City Staff: Assess renewable purchase options, draft proposals to the EEC and City Council, present opportunities to City Council and EEC, follow through with implementation of selected option(s) , reach out to receive lessons learned from other cities Xcel Energy: Provide renewable energy opportunity expertise, tailored to Edina municipal facilities, meet with City staff and others as appropriate to discuss options, provide supporting data as appropriate Ongoing management Tracking and reporting EEC Working Group: Review updates and share with the broader EEC, advise on tracking metrics and progress City Staff: Maintain library of tracking data, assess progress Xcel Energy: Provide quarterly data briefings based on identified tracking metrics, provide regular updates on renewable rates, opportunities, and promotions and conservation offerings CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 35 Municipal Facilities Focus Area Timeline Longer-term Actions (Oct. 2016 – Dec. 2017) •Support implementation of prioritized projects •Assess if any City facilities would benefit from Turn Key services •Prioritize renewable energy opportunities, based on off-set potential and cost analysis •Recommend adoption of renewable energy opportunities •Research funding opportunities for projects Immediate Actions (July– Sept. 2016) •Review building study recommendations •Meet with Xcel Energy to review the building study recommendations and evaluate opportunities for program participation •Prioritize projects based on energy savings potential and cost analysis •Meet with Xcel Energy to learn about renewable energy opportunities Ongoing – Tracking • Update City website quarterly with current information • Assist in development of City facilities case studies to be distributed by the Business group • Present quarterly to EEC • Check on goal progress quarterly CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 36 Focus Area: Residential Information Campaign Four key strategies support the Residential Information Campaign, which will be championed by the Energy and Environment Commission energy work group, City communications staff, the CAS staff position, City leadership, and community leaders. Mid-way through implementation, it is anticipated that the success of the actions outlined below will be assessed, and continuing activities will be driven by the results of that assessment, to ensure the campaign is as successful as possible. A detailed implementation timeline is included as Appendix 7. RESIDENTIAL INFORMATION CAMPAIGN OVERVIEW Goals • 750 homes take energy-savings actions each year, saving 562,000 kWh annually, or 395 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. • Double the number of subscribers to Windsource® and double the average amount subscribed within 18 months. (675 new Windsource® subscribers, average subscription of 534 kWh per month) This would produce an additional 8,505,000 kWh total, or 5,977 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. Key Messages • Join your community to combat climate change. • Don’t be an energy hog! • Save money on your energy bill, through energy efficiency and conservation. • Try the latest technologies in your home. Targeted Actions • Install and program smart thermostats • Get a Home Energy Squad® visit • Sign up for “My Account” online and look under “My Energy” • Subscribe to Windsource® Strategy: Drive traffic to a City operated web resource through City communications channels Leadership: City communications staff Actions: • Drive residents to a city-hosted website, where they will have access to actionable resources, a gauge that shows community progress, a calendar of activities and events, and testimonials • Create paced content for: the Sun Current, City Website, and City social media • Consider secondary channels, such as water bill inserts • Evaluate outside funding or donations from local businesses to provide incentives for residents to complete actions • Evaluate effectiveness of messaging mid-way though the campaign, and add additional actions/refine messaging if goals aren’t being hit Strategy: Foster neighborhood-based outreach and leadership Leadership: EEC Actions: • Develop EEC members as ambassadors to their neighborhoods • Identify additional neighborhood advocates passionate about energy • Provide tips and tools for community leaders to post to NextDoor and promote energy-savings actions at community events, such as block parties • Solicit ‘best practice’ sharing from community members on their experience and what works with neighbors in semi-annual online or in- CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 37 Energy Work Group, Neighborhood leaders person forums. • Increase EEC budget to train leaders and volunteers • Increase environmental forum frequency to twice each year Strategy: Leverage outreach events for Windsource® sign- ups Leadership: EEC Energy Work Group Actions: • Develop a calendar of events (e.g. farmer’s markets, Edina art festival), and prioritize based on target participants • Test on-the-spot sign-up functionality for Windsource® • Identify volunteer groups (i.e. Edina Community Foundation, student groups) and assess possible incentives for volunteer participation • Develop materials to train volunteers; coordinate with City volunteer coordination staff Strategy: Assess policy options to support efficiency for Edina residents Leadership: Small group composed of City staff and EEC work group Actions: • Recommend ongoing City subsidization of Home Energy Squad visits for low income and other households each year and an increase from the previous $10,000 subsidy for 200 visits • Assist with establishing best practices and policies for energy efficiency and conservation for City of Edina residents • Develop a short term and long term list of potential policies Measuring Success Website click rates and in-person signups. Track program participation and overall energy usage through Xcel Energy data. Have regular reports to the EEC and City Council. Potentially leverage Edina’s bi-annual quality of life survey for tracking. Quarterly reports to EEC and City Council. Interim Goals TEAM Community Lead(s) Lead: EEC Energy Work Group, Conservation and Sustainability staff, : City communications staff, City leadership, community leaders Team: City Council member to champion, potential for students and schools to partner Community Partners City communications staff, neighborhood organizations, outreach work group of EEC, others who could distribute or display content... Outreach and Communication Channels Highlight specific messages as detailed above. Channels: Use Edina publications (Edina Sun Current, City website, City videos), Nextdoor, ask neighborhood associations to distribute content, leverage in-person events Xcel Energy Support Marketing material development support, program information, goal tracking, email blasts, etc. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 38 KEY ROLES FOR RESIDENTIAL INFORMATION CAMPAIGN Drive traffic to a City operated web resource through City communications channels EEC Working Group: Provide feedback on messaging for website and publication pieces, provide “feature” content leads for publications City Staff: Program and maintain website, refine messaging and layout for website, implement distribution of messaging through City channels, ensuring a coordinated ask for residents and regularly timed outreach, leverage highest performing channels, research tools residents can use to monitor and reduce energy consumption to share on the website, including developing real-time case studies showing ongoing energy usage and how actions impact electricity usage Xcel Energy: Provide technical content and advise on website messaging as desired, provide community-specific data, provide best practice expertise in reaching residential energy users, help to plan outreach schedule, review/format any marketing materials or messages, contribute best practice expertise on community outreach Foster neighborhood- based outreach and leadership EEC Working Group: Ask EEC members to be pilot leaders within their communities, identify and contact other community leaders City Staff: Act as a point of contact for interested leaders, distribute materials as appropriate, City leadership to take message to gatherings and invite audiences to join the effort, arrange for a public gather to exchange ideas on GHG reduction Xcel Energy: Provide best practice expertise in community based social marketing, format/review any marketing materials or tools, provide neighborhood-specific data and mapping as appropriate Leverage outreach events for Windsource® sign-ups EEC Working Group: Identify and recruit volunteers, track ongoing coordination, help to develop training materials, maintain community events calendar and set up tabling opportunities City Staff: Support maintenance of events calendar and volunteer coordination for tabling, host tabling supplies, act as point of contact for interested volunteers Xcel Energy: Help refine messaging to volunteers and residents who visit tables, format/review any marketing materials or tools, contribute best practice expertise on tabling at events Assess policy options to support efficiency for Edina residents and ongoing support EEC Working Group: Share updates with the broader EEC, coordinate with City staff, advocate for policy options City Staff: Coordinate with EEC, provide analysis of policy options Xcel Energy: Provide quarterly updates based on identified tracking metrics, provide overall project tracking and management, including facilitated meetings and follow up, research case studies for policy options as needed, provide regular updates on renewable rates, opportunities, and promotions and conservation offerings CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 39 Residential Information Campaign Focus Area Timeline: Longer-term Actions (Oct. 2016 – Dec. 2017) •Launch City website presence •Plan and implement a social media campaign •Research and develop Sun Current feature articles •Table at in-person events •Reach out to local community leaders to be advocates •Develop and maintain an on-going multi-channel information campaign Immediate Actions (July– Sept. 2016) •Develop messaging for Phase I of the campaign / test specific messages •Strategize around Sun Current highest impact / investigate queue for stories •Identify in-person events with strong sign up potential; utilize mayor and City Manager for messages •Identify and train a volunteer base to table at events •Leverage EEC members as community ambassadors •Recommend the City subsidize Home Energy Squad visits for low income and other households each year at $10,000 subsidy for 200 visits Ongoing – Tracking • Update City website quarterly with current information • Check on goal progress quarterly • Evaluate effectiveness of messaging mid-way through the campaign • Consider leveraging Edina’s bi-annual quality of life survey for tracking CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 40 Focus Area: Business Energy Three key strategies support the Business Energy focus area, which will be championed by the new Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) Staff member, City leadership, the EEC energy work group, and will leverage partnerships with local business associations. A detailed timeline is included as Appendix 7. While this plan is focused on electricity, messaging for businesses may be combined with other city priorities, such as recycling. BUSINESS ENERGY OVERVIEW: Goals Reduce and/or off-set through renewable energy 2% of electricity usage annually, or by 7.3 million kWh in the first year, or 5,140 metric tons of CO2 equivalent. Short-term: Engage 100 of the top 400 business energy users Long-term: Engage all 400 of the top 400 business energy users Strategy: Engage the top business energy users to take action on greenhouse gas through offsets and reductions Leadership: City leadership, CAS staff, EEC work group, local business organizations Actions: • Compile list of largest businesses and develop tracking tool for outreach coordination; assess potential barriers. • Develop outreach message and clear ask to partner with the City in achieving the City’s GHG reduction goals • Compile relevant resources on energy efficiency, renewable energy opportunities, and other GHG reduction strategies, including natural gas strategies as appropriate • Use city and local leadership to contact 100 of the 400 largest businesses through direct contact or existing forums • Develop 3-4 case studies of local business projects, including a potential real-time case study showing ongoing energy usage and how actions impact electricity usage • Share progress and make policy recommendations through regular reports to the EEC and City Council • City leadership and chamber of commerce to identify and recognize business partners, such as at in-person gathering • Work with Xcel Energy to identify partners and best practices • Create a recognition and/or competition partnership with businesses Strategy: Target small to medium businesses, such as restaurants and retail with recognition programs Leadership: CAS Staff, Energy Work Group, local business organizations Actions: • Document existing City and EEC outreach to small business and lessons learned • Develop standardized messages based on business type to distribute, including both energy efficiency and renewable energy strategies. • Work with the Chamber of Commerce, City, and 50th and France Association to assemble lists of similar businesses types and contact through mail and emails • Work with Xcel Energy small to medium business programs, such as TurnKey Services and renewable energy opportunities, and to collaborate on community–specific outreach • Connect businesses with additional resources that can help with GHG reduction, including solid waste • Design and implement a retail-oriented recognition program in partnership with the City Council for companies that undertake the CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 41 program successfully • Share case studies of businesses that have completed energy projects. Feature these businesses in conjunction with Residential Information Campaign, if applicable • Distribute a tracking tool for setting an energy baseline, measuring and reporting • Work with Xcel Energy to identify best practices Strategy: Ongoing Management and tracking Leadership: CAS Staff Actions: • Keep list of recognized business to form a library of best practices. Incorporate reports of City and School actions into this library • Provide quarterly progress updates from Xcel Energy • Identify other metrics tor track progress Strategy: Assess policy options to support greenhouse gas reduction for Edina businesses. Leadership: CAS Staff Actions: • Review best practice policy options for engaging large and small businesses, including current local policy, and mandatory energy disclosure for large businesses, such as in Minneapolis • Assess impact and benefits of city policy options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in businesses, including: sustainability, roof gardens, LED lighting, energy efficiency, planting trees, composting, and renewable energy subscriptions • Research case studies on effective policies from other cities (e.g. Minneapolis, Portland, OR) Measuring Success Track program participation through Xcel Energy data every six months. Document leadership responses from large Edina businesses. Quarterly reports to EEC and City Council. TEAM Community Lead(s) Lead: Climate and Sustainability Staff, City Council member as champion Team: Energy and Environment Energy Work Group small group, City leadership Community Partners Chamber of Commerce, Rotary Club, 50th and France organization, City communications staff, Xcel Energy program managers, other community leaders. Outreach and Communication Channels Large Businesses: Leverage business organizations and City staff with connections to largest businesses. Personalized calls from CAS staff, follow-up mailings and calls. Meetings, webinars, and website presence. Small and Medium Businesses: Reach through local business associations, e-blasts, and door-to-door flyer distribution. General Public: City media channels, including: social media, Sun Current, signage, a video. Xcel Energy Support Coordination with Xcel Energy Program Managers, marketing material development support, goal tracking, email blasts, etc. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 42 KEY ROLES FOR BUSINESS ENERGY STRATEGIES Engage the top business energy users to take action on greenhouse gas reductions EEC Working Group: Facilitate partnerships with Chamber of Commerce, City Economic Development Manager, and CAS Staff; help to prioritize messaging and asks to the largest businesses; advocate for resident support of participating businesses; work with City communications, the facilitation team, and Xcel Energy to connect businesses to resources City Staff: Primary lead on direct business outreach, in coordination with EEC network and Xcel Energy staff; create and maintain database of contacts, coordinate with local business organizations, help to refine messaging and marketing materials, program and maintain relevant website content, lead on organizing recognition platforms, City leadership to partner with businesses that want to make a difference and be part of the community to reduce GHG emissions, City leadership to recognize business partners publically Xcel Energy: Provide community-specific segmentation of top energy users that adheres to privacy guidelines, provide informed guidance on how to prioritize businesses, directly contact managed accounts to inform and invite participation, review and help develop marketing materials and relevant program information, contribute best practice expertise on contacting large businesses and compelling calls to action, offer Xcel Energy subject matter experts given interest in specific efficiency and renewable energy topics Target small to medium sized businesses, such as restaurants and retail, with recognition program EEC Working Group: Facilitate partnerships with the Chamber of Commerce and other professional organizations; review priority actions of small businesses for greenhouse gas impact; coordinate with City communications and Xcel Energy team to develop and promote successful recognition campaign; advocate for resident support of participating businesses City Staff: Document existing work, develop list of local businesses, develop outreach and recognition materials, coordinate with professional organizations, create recommended list of energy tracking tools and software for business energy reduction, manager workload for City leaders Xcel Energy: Provide community-specific data to inform business segmentation; assist in developing and reviewing marketing materials, provide Xcel Energy subject matter experts to provide energy reduction practices if there’s enough interest, contribute best practice expertise on contacting small businesses Ongoing management and tracking Assess policy options to support greenhouse gas reduction for Edina businesses EEC Working Group: Share updates with the broader EEC, coordinate with City staff, advocate for policy options, design an annual recognition program, research case studies for policy options as needed City Staff: Coordinate with EEC and Xcel Energy, provide analysis of policy options, manage library of case studies and participating businesses, administer recognition program, provide regular updates on renewable rates, opportunities, and promotions and conservation offerings CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 43 Xcel Energy: Provide quarterly updates based on identified tracking metrics, provide overall project tracking and management, including facilitated meetings and follow up, provide expertise on business recognition programs Business Energy Focus Area Timeline Longer-term Actions (Oct. 2016 – Dec. 2017) •Identify top 100 prospects to reach out to first •Continue to develop an outreach campaign to large businesses, complete by September 1 •Roll out large business outreach effort (September – November 2016) •Launch City website presence by end of 2016 •Continue to identify 400 largest businesses and contacts and keep them in a database, complete by September 1 Immediate Actions (July– Sept. 2016) •Start to identify 400 largest businesses and contacts and keep them in a database •Develop an outreach effort to large businesses •Develop the “ask” for businesses Ongoing – Tracking • Develop or identify a tool that will be used to measure results by March 2017 • Plan any recognition events for businesses CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 44 How Are We Going To Stay On Course? – Monitoring and Reporting This plan outlines strategies and specific actions that will meet community wide goals, focusing on the first 18 months of Partners in Energy supported activity. As the planning team transitions to implementation, structuring implementation teams around regular accountability and progress updates will be key to success. Core City staff, including the Conservation and Sustainability Staff and potentially members of the EEC work groups, will initially meet bi-weekly with Xcel Energy Partners in Energy staff to coordinate resources and develop a more detailed work plan. The Xcel Energy Partners in Energy staff will work to schedule these meetings on a standing basis with City staff. These meetings will serve to share information on progress and strategies, and to coordinate support from Xcel Energy Partners in Energy staff. EEC members will start with the actions outlined in the “immediate actions” outlined in this plan, and develop more detailed monthly work plans within specific focus area work groups and share these work plans with the Conservation and Sustainability staff. Operational Actions and Tracking The Partners in Energy facilitation team will work with Xcel Energy to obtain electricity usage data and program participation data, and will share outcomes with the new Conservation and Sustainability staff position. Data can be split by sector, so each focus area will be able to track progress. The Conservation and Sustainability staff will work with the Energy and Environment Commission Energy Work Group to publicize results and share with City Council and the broader Edina community. Strategy and focus area leads are identified for each of the three focus areas. In addition to City support for implementation of this action plan, the Energy and Environment Committee will form citizen work groups to work on each focus area. Xcel Energy and the facilitation team will continue to support project management and provide other resources throughout implementation. The new Conservation and Sustainability staff member will act as a point person for implementation, and should be cc’d on work group emails to track progress, as well as community facilitator Emma Struss (estruss@mncee.org). As the role is onboarding, Ross Bintner (RBintner@edinamn.gov) should be cc’d until the new staff is in place. Communication and Reporting Each strategy has outlined plans to keep the broader Edina community engaged and informed throughout Partners in Energy implementation. A website presence will be developed to provide access to resources and tracking for all community members. Energy and Environment Commission work groups for each focus area will meet regularly. The full EEC meets on a CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN 45 monthly basis. Overall, progress will be tracked on a quarterly basis from energy data provided by Xcel Energy and analyzed by the facilitation team. The team will work closely with the Conservation and Sustainability staff member and EEC small group to ensure data is distributed. Evolution of Strategies and Goals This plan outlines strategies and goals for an 18-month implementation period. It is anticipated that the success and outcomes of initial actions will impact how each focus area moves forward. Initial actions that will happen in the next three months are more clearly defined, with following actions intentionally left more broad to flex with the outcomes of the first few months of implementation. City staff and the citizen small groups working on plan implementation will help to determine how and when strategies and actions need to shift course. Lessons Learned Experience in implementation of Energy Action Plans with other Partners in Energy communities has shown that the following things are key factors for success: • Continued involvement of select members of the core planning team for continuity during implementation • Committed availability of staff coordination time • Regular progress tracking and shifting actions and goals as needed • Focus on getting strategies off the ground early on in implementation • Work to continuously engage the community while avoiding burnout • Celebrate early successes to motivate the team and the community CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN Appendix 2: Workshop Process Overview Workshop Process Overview The section below includes more detail on how the group developed the above vision, focus areas, and strategies over the course of four workshops. Workshop 1 The facilitation team introduced the Partners in Energy program, and presented an initial set of data on Edina energy usage. The group brainstormed their favorite Edina assets. First individually, and then as a group, the team defined what an ideal energy future for Edina looks like. As team members presented the qualities they deemed most important, trends surfaced which included a focus on high quality of life, good City government, innovation, leadership, and a desire for a measurable, affordable and attainable vision. At the end of Workshop 1, three volunteers formed a small workgroup to wordsmith a draft vision statement. Small Visioning Group A small group developed three energy vision statements based upon the Energy Action Team’s workshop discussion. They used materials provided by the facilitation team as a guideline, and drafted a vision statement. These three statements were sent out for community feedback between Workshop 1 and Workshop 2. The most preferred statement was presented to the group at Workshop 2. Workshop 2 The workshop started by recapitulating Workshop 1 and setting objectives for Workshop 2. Background information on Edina’s 25/25 Goals and the Energy and Environment Commission was presented by Bill Sierks and Sarah Zarrin. Michelle Swanson presented on Xcel Energy’s Sustainability Activities. The facilitation team then presented detailed data and opportunities in the residential and business energy sectors. The group worked individually and then as a team to identify areas of focus for the Energy Action Plan, grouping ideas into “residential,” “business,” and “other” categories. As the group discussed focus areas, several themes emerged: providing information to residents about existing programs and technologies, leveraging the schools and youth, creating new City policies, reaching out to businesses through professional organizations, leveraging feedback on energy usage to promote behavior change, and Workshop 1 Visioning Activity Workshop 2 Focus Areas Activity CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN increasing Windsource® subscriptions. The group reviewed and discussed the energy vision statement, identifying a few areas for clarification. At the end of Workshop 2, the facilitation team identified next steps. Workshop 3 The group shared their individual energy use during introductions, and recapped Workshop 2. Then the group walked through each of the focus areas brainstormed in Workshop 2, noting impact and feasibility considerations as well as addition background research provided by the facilitation team. The group then nominated and voted on focus areas. The top four focus areas were: Schools and Service Learning (6 votes), Residential Information Campaign (5 votes), City Facilities (5 votes), and Residential Windsource® (4 votes.) The next focus area was Outreach through Organizations for Businesses, which was shelved to revisit at Workshop 4, when more business representatives could attend. The facilitation team walked through an introduction to goals and strategies. The group broke into three small groups to discuss Schools and Service Learning, Residential Information Campaign, and Residential Windsource®. Each small group brainstormed draft goals and strategies and shared them back with the larger group. Workshop 4 As an introduction, the group shared energy savings actions they would recommend to their neighbors. The group then reviewed focus areas selected at Workshop 3, including information on the potential impact of draft goals. The group also discussed Edina’s BAU (business as usual) projections for carbon emissions in the electricity sector, showing that Edina is anticipated to exceed a 30% reduction in electricity-driven carbon emissions by 2025. Ross Bintner presented calculations and research on the Municipal Facilities focus area, including a rough greenhouse gas inventory. The group discussed adding a business-oriented focus area and decided that it would be beneficial. The team broke into small groups by focus are to refine strategies and goals. Small groups included: Residential Information Campaign, Schools and Service Learning, and Business Efficiency. The group shared back with the group and noted actions to accomplish before the next workshop. Workshop 3 Small Groups Workshop 4 Strategy Work CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN Workshop 5 The facilitation team gave a recap of the resources available for implementation and what the next steps for the plan would look like. The Energy Action team reviewed decisions made between workshops four and five, including the change of the Schools and Service Learning focus area, as well as a desire to call out the electricity-centric focus of this planning document. The team voted to discontinue the Windsource® focus area as a separate focus area, but to include components in the business focus area as well as the residential focus area. The bulk of the workshop was spent in two small groups: Residential Information Campaign and Business Energy. The small groups worked on finalizing goals and strategies, and the residential small group worked to place actions on a timeline. Both small groups cited a need to meet again and refine the strategies, goals, and actions of the focus areas. Workshop 5 Energy Action Team Group Photo 5/25/2016 1 CITY OF EDINA CLIMATE CHANGE GOALS WORK SESSION WITH CITY COUNCIL April 8, 2015 GHG MILESTONES •U.S. MAYORS CLIMATE PROTECTION AGREEMENT – 2/07 •ICLEI CITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION – 11/07 –5 Milestones Commitment •CHAPTER 10 CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN – 2008 –Adopts MN Next Gen Energy Goals 5/25/2016 2 EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION GOALS 15 % by 2015 30% by 2025 80% by 2050 Comp Plan 10.2.3. EDINA COMMUNITY GHG EMISSIONS 2007 - 2013 - Down 8.9% 200000 300000 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000 1000000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 GHG Emissions in CO2e Tons / Year 5/25/2016 3 2015 Goal Requires 5% Reduction From 2013 400000 500000 600000 700000 800000 900000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Comp Plan Progress Report: Action Needed - 1 1. Establish city carbon footprint ---Inventory, baseline and forecast •Community Baseline (Regional Indicators) •No City Baseline •No Inventory •No forecast Comprehensive Plan 10.2.3. 5/25/2016 4 Comp Plan Progress Report: Action Needed - 2 2. Develop GHG Reduction Targets For City Operations •No Targets developed Comprehensive Plan 10.2.3. Comp Plan Progress Report: Action Needed - 3 3. Develop Local Action Plan ---Specific policies and measures to achieve targets ---Timelines, financing mechanisms ---Assign responsibility to staff, departments •No City Action Plan Comprehensive Plan 10.2.3. 5/25/2016 5 EEC RECOMMENDS COUNCIL TAKE SEVERAL ACTIONS 1. Set Interim GHG Goals & Targets A. Energy B. Vehicle Emissions & Miles Traveled C. Waste & Wastewater EEC RECOMMENDED ACTIONS - 2 2. Appoint City Council Champion 3. Name Department and Staff Responsibility In Specific Work Plans 5/25/2016 6 EEC RECOMMENDED ACTIONS - 3 4. Provide Funding Support for GHG Action Steps In EEC Workplan •First Priority: Energy Efficient Building Project Funding Is Vital - Approval Needed MN BENCHMARKING PROGRAM SHOWS CITY CAN SAVR OVER $500,000 ANNUALLY •Edina Ranked # 155 of 214 Benchmarked Cities •$523,000 in Potential Annual Energy Savings •Fourth Highest City in Potential Savings 5/25/2016 7 EEC WORK PLAN •GHG Action is #1 priority •City Building efficiency has been top strategy of EEC for 3 years. DATE: February 23, 2016 TO: Partners in Energy Planning Team CC: Energy and Environment Commission FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: City of Edina Energy, Conservation and Sustainability Goal Summary This report provides a summary of energy, environment and sustainability goals to support the Partners in Energy planning initiative city operations focus area. This report is an update to a report initially produced in 2013 to support an Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) initiative to better integrate City environmental sustainability goals into City operations. Mission and Vision The mission of the City of Edina defines the foundation for the organization. The mission reflects the authorities and core services that are delegated to Cities in Minnesota including public safety, local transportation networks, clean water and public sanitation, and orderly land use. The mission specifically recognizes key roles of infrastructure systems, land redevelopment and public facilities in sustaining a high quality of life in the community. • Our mission is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses The vision of the City of Edina was recently updated after extensive public involvement. Vision Edina defines how the organization and community at large sees itself and its approach and understanding of future challenges. • Edina holds a well-earned reputation as a city of choice. It is the model of a successful, mature, and progressive urban community, that strives to lead in a modern and evolving world. We maintain our heritage and attractiveness, and afford our residents the highest quality of life, while actively embracing our future. This vision also spells out five strategic focus areas; 1) Inclusive and connected, 2) Built-to-scale development, 3) Sustainable environment, 4) A community of learning, 5) Future oriented. Strategic area four includes specific vision statements that speak from the future about sustainability including; • Edina has focused and invested in world-class citywide resource management systems, built around the leading principles of environmental sustainability. • We have substantially reduced our overall environmental impact and significantly increased our resource use efficiency. • Our planning has integrated the best-proven standards of sustainable building and environmental stewardship into all aspects of our city planning and building codes. • Our community continues to treasure and protect our public spaces and parks. We have enhanced our biodiversity and natural ecosystems, which in turn support and purify our natural environment. While the mission of the City of Edina can be accomplished without an emphasis on environmental sustainability, the vision of the Community includes the specific focus to implement the mission in a way that is future oriented, and environmentally sustainable. Comprehensive Plan, Goals and Policy A variety of city wide policy and plan speak to topics of conservation and sustainability. Specific City Council resolutions, City ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan were reviewed. The following list is intended to summarize types of energy, and environment topics, and specific goals articulated in each document relating to energy, conservation and sustainability. 1. Resolution 2007-05 City Code Section 2-137 and formation of the EEC a. No specific goals set. 2. Code of Ordinances, Chapter 2, Article 3, Division 3 (2-137) Energy and Environment Commission a. Chapter two, division 1 describes role of boards as providing advice to Council and investigate subjects of interest to the City. b. The Council, recognizing the need to support and advance environmental protection, conservation efforts including energy conservation, and waste reduction, and to improve thereby the overall welfare of the citizens of the City, does hereby establish the Energy and Environment Commission. c. Duties; The Commission shall: i. Examine and recommend best practices for energy conservation for Edina’s citizens and businesses, including a “green” building code, use of Energy Star appliances, and other energy reduction targets. ii. Examine and recommend changes in City Government purchasing and operations to conserve energy. iii. Evaluate and monitor the provision of a residential recycling program. iv. Evaluate and monitor the provision of a privately provided solid waste program, as well as a reduction in municipal solid waste produced by Edina residents and businesses. v. Evaluate and encourage improvements in air and water quality. vi. Promote the establishment of targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions produced by the City’s buildings, equipment and operations. vii. Educate the public about energy issues, reduction, conservation, reuse, recycling and environmental protection. viii. Examine and promote renewable energy options for transportation, heating, and cooling, and other energy uses. 3. Resolution 2007-20 Endorsing US Mayors Climate Protection Agreement a. Preamble contains mentions of IPCC study, greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction, climate change, adaptation, planning for natural disasters, and the Kyoto Protocol. b. RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors endorses the U.S Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. c. RESOLVED, that the U.S. Conference of Mayors will work in conjunction with ICLEI Local Governments for sustainability or other appropriate organization for track progress and implementation of the U.S. Mayors Climate Agreement. (The wording of the ordinance seems to simply proclaim the work of the US Mayor group) 4. Resolution 2007-119 Joining ICLEI Cities for Climate Protection Campaign a. Preamble assumes 2007-20 authorized city signing the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement and that the City has committed to take a variety of actions including: i. Urging Federal policy and programs to meet Kyoto protocol goals ii. Promote land use and transportation policies that reduce GHG iii. Increase use of renewable energy and energy efficiency iv. Adopt purchasing and building construction and operations practices that reduce GHG v. Increase recycling rates and urban forest cover vi. Support education efforts to reduce GHG in the community b. RESOLVED, City will join ICLEI Cities Climate Protection Campaign and take a leadership role in reducing GHG in the community and promote public awareness about impacts of climate change. 5. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 10 Energy and Environment a. Section 10.1 Introduction and History: This section describes a history of environmental action in Edina and the formation of the EEC. b. Section 10.2 Climate Change and Global Warming: includes trends and challenges, background describing ICLEI and Mayor Climate Protection resolutions, and 2007 State GHG goal are included. This section includes the following goals and policies: i. Conduct 2007 Baseline GHG emissions assessment (this effort was undertaken by the EEC, but the result is of little organizational value as a baseline due to the lack of data transparency and final report) ii. GHG reduction goal: 15% reduction by 2015, 25% reduction by 2025, 80% reduction by 2050 (the 2025 goal has been interpreted to be in error, as the reference standard is set at 30% by 2025.) iii. Develop a local action plan iv. Implement policies and measures in the local action plan v. Monitor and verify results of implementation c. Section 10.3 Energy: Describes environmental costs of current mix of energy generation, and states importance of developing local and renewable sources of electric power. Topics of biofuels and fuel use reduction are covered. This section includes the following goals and policies: i. Lead by example in conserving energy and developing renewable energy for city buildings, fleets and operations. ii. Promote community and business energy conservation including policies or incentives for energy efficiency, renewable energy, and reduction in GHG iii. Adopt purchasing guidelines for Edina that include renewable energy sources such as wind sourced electric or biofuels. iv. Promote educational programs to inform residents and businesses about energy v. Obtains grants for adoption of renewable energy sources and work to make these projects self-sustaining. d. Section 10.4 Solar Protection: Discusses potential for ordinances for solar protection and details 4 considerations and specific actions to develop further policy in this area. This section includes the following goals and policies: i. Continue to enforce setback, building height, and lot coverage ordinance that can serve as protection to solar access ii. Consider access to solar when reviewing variance applications iii. Promote use of passive solar in building design iv. Establish policies to restrict development for the purpose of protection solar access e. Section 10.5 Residential Energy Consumption: The section details the three major components of residential energy use; electric, heat and transportation and discusses energy trends and the Energy Star label. This section includes the following goals and policies: i. Inform residents on energy efficiency ii. Create incentives to reduce residential energy use iii. Promote LEED certification for new construction iv. Encourage green materials and tree planting to reduce heating and cooling needs v. Inform homebuilders and remodelers of energy efficiency f. 10.6 Commercial and Industrial Energy Consumption: This section discusses potential opportunity for efficiency in the commercial and industrial sector, as well as challenges. This section includes the following goals and policies: i. Promote renewable energy g. 10.7 City Energy Consumption: Describes the ability of the city to play a leadership role by reducing its own energy in buildings (56%), water and sanitary operations (33%), Fleet (5%), Street lights (2%) and employee commute (4%). This section includes the following goals and policies: i. Create benchmarks for current energy use in all public facilities and reduce to GHG reduction goal. ii. Establish policy for annual build energy use report and goals for reduction. h. Section 10.8 Waste: This section discusses the history of recycling in Edina, and describes the state of the industry and an increasing amount of waste generated. Trends in waste types and options for handling are discussed such as sources separated organic composting and electronic waste. This section includes the following goals and policies: i. Continue to operate a household recycling program encouraging reduction, reuse and recycling ii. Encourage backyard home composting of organic material iii. Support citywide collection of source separate organics iv. Encourage businesses to participate in MN chamber waste wise program v. Encourage proper disposal of household hazardous waste vi. Educate consumers to buy green vii. Recommend changes to City purchasing policy viii. Expand range of plastics that can be recycled ix. Encourage greater recycling among businesses x. Identify an Edina site that would produce renewable energy from City waste, such as an anaerobic digester. i. Section 10.10.1 Air: This section describes coal burning and automobile traffic as major causes of impairment to generally good air quality and also details potential indoor air quality issues. This section includes the following goals and policies: i. Cooperate with statewide and regional air quality efforts ii. Encourage mechanical ventilation systems in new homes iii. Provide incentives for building practices that improve indoor air quality iv. Encourage tree planting to reduce noise and absorb carbon v. Consider vehicle idling ordinance, and promote ‘no idling’ near school and public parking lots vi. Promote the use of renewable energy sources to reduce coal particulate in regional air 6. 2008 Comprehensive Plan – Related Chapters a. Chapter 4 – Land Use i. Chapter 4.2 details natural features, landforms, water resources around which the built- environment is situated. The land use example of Southdale explains a context of using a massive heat pump, the largest in the world at the time, to “make our own weather at Southdale.” ii. Chapter 4.3 details issues around zoning, mixed uses, and connectivity of transportation networks. iii. Chapter 4.4 includes goals to increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connects, and reduce dependence on the car, as well incorporating principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of design, construction, renovation, and long-term operation of new and existing development. This chapter also talks about the fundamental link between land use and transportation. b. Chapter 7 – Transportation i. Goals include; Minimizing the impacts of the transportation system on Edina’s , reducing the overall dependence on and use of single-occupant vehicles, Provide multiple travel options for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists, and rideshare users, managing parking and encourage join and shared use of facilities, ride share, bicycle parking, and increased transit use, and providing efficient movement of goods. ii. Policies include; Use economic and environmentally sound management techniques for snow and ice removal, a variety of pedestrian and bicycle recommendations. c. Chapter 8 – Water Resource Management i. This section covers the three major utilities that provide clean water service to Edina; Sanitary Sewer, Domestic Water, and Storm Sewer. Descriptions of the capacity of trunk sewers indicate that total water and sanitary use are a critical factor in the ultimate development density of the City. The storm sewer services of clean surface water and flood protection are described in detail and reference the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan, Nondegradation of Waters Report, local watershed plans, individual lake studies, and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. ii. Goals include; Eliminating inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary system and protecting the health safety and welfare of citizens, modifying permitting and enforcement processes for construction activities, clean water education, providing clean, safe and high quality potable water, provide for sustainability of water supply through promotion of water conservation. iii. Policies include; Eliminating points of inflow and infiltration to the sanitary system, restricting discharge of clean water into the sanitary system, implementation of the various surface water and pollution prevention plans for clean water and flood protection and implementation of the Water Supply Plan to encourage a reduction in water demand. d. Chapter 9 – Parks Open Space, and Natural Resources i. This section details links to surface water quality and parks operations, the restoration of natural resources, links to community health, active living goals and recreation places and space opportunities and regional amenities and trail networks. A variety of natural areas are catalogued, and environmental trends listed. ii. This section includes a “Natural Resource Conservation and Management” part that details water resources and natural areas, and a “Wildlife Management Plan” that details habitat for birds and wildlife, and conservation and restoration of natural areas. iii. Natural resource and wildlife goals include; Establishing a natural resource conservation and management plan for restoration and protection of natural resources. Ensure development includes provisions for protection of shorelines, creeks and lakes. Identify a master landscape planting plan for all Edina parks. Conserve and replace Edina urban forest. Maintain existing wildlife sanctuaries. Continue to improve shoreline fishing opportunities. iv. Natural resource and wildlife policies include; conducting a natural resource inventory of prairies, woods, wetlands, establishing a natural resource conservation and management plan, managing deer, goose and beaver population, and provide fishing opportunities. 7. 2011-37 Joining Greenstep Cities a. No specific goals or policy set; implementation actions intended to help City meet its sustainability goals. Challenge, competition, recognitions and ideas-network functions served as well. b. Preamble describes GHG reduction goals in 2007 Next Generation Act goals. c. Appoints the EEC to serve as the GreenStep coordinator. While detailed plan and policy information exists in the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, and the Parks Strategic plan about water and natural resource environmental service, these topics were only covered to the level of the comprehensive plan in the “related chapters” section. Attachments: Link to prior Vision and Strategic Plan Link prior Vision Edina Link to Comprehensive Plan Copy of prior summary memo includes Resolution 2007-20, Resolution 2007-119, and Resolution 2011-37 Link to Section (2-137) Energy and Environment Commission DATE: February 23, 2016 TO: Partners in Energy Planning Team CC: Energy and Environment Commission FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: City Operations Focus Area / Footprint Analysis and Reduction Concept The Partners in Energy Planning team chose a focus area around greenhouse gas (GHG) in City of Edina operations. This report was requested by the team, and provides a concept-level estimate of GHG footprint in City operations to inform the effort of the planning team. The “concept” level of detail is important to note, as I have not been trained to perform GHG analysis. In performing this analysis I worked with planning team member Kyle Sawyer, and Michael Orange with Orange Environmental to translate 2015 City of Edina expenses data into approximate GHG emissions. Mr. Orange has conducted GHG assessments and politely emphasizes my lack of training when asked! In addition to GHG, I also attempted to summarize other notable environmental footprint not directly related to energy, such as water and land to demonstrate the concept of tradeoffs in City operations. Methodology and Analysis Mr. Sawyer provided a spreadsheet with all 2015 budget and actual expenses broken down by City of Edina business units and object accounts. The business units were ignored, and the object accounts were used to group like expenses into total dollar values. Those total dollar values were then converted to units of material or energy, or directly translated to GHG using reference factors from a variety of information sources noted in Table 1. To use an analogy: Sometimes we try to get ‘ballpark’ estimates; In this case, I see turf under my feet, and suspect I’m in a ballpark, but I still don’t know if I’m in the right ballpark! Chart 1 presents the same information, in a visual format to draw attention to areas of opportunity. Note that only GHG footprint is represented and that capital expenditure “pathways” are underrepresented in importance. For example, while Edina may only spend a third of the budget on new equipment, vehicles, buildings and roads, these new and replacement facilities and infrastructure write future energy costs into concrete, steel and stone. Since business units were ignored in the summary, I try to map major sources of GHG back into the business unit framework in Table 2, by summarizing notable city services and footprint that associate highly with each type of expense and GHG. In Table 2, I also provide example indicators where environmental performance is now measured and where policy or tools currently exist. I look forward to the help of the planning team, and the EEC in completing this policy tool mapping exercise. To extend the concept, and start to point toward solutions, Table 3 provides very rough GHG reduction strategy, estimates and costs and starts to not opportunities and barriers. While this may not be the focus of Partners in Energy meeting 4, we may get to this level of detail in subsequent meetings. Your input is required and welcome. Table 4 demonstrates the level of implementation needed for various levels of reduction. Attachments: Table 1 – GHG Estimate from City Operations Chart 1 – GHG Estimate by Category of Major Expense. Table 2 – Footprint, Indicators, Tools and Policy Table 3 – Concept GHG Reduction Options Table 4 – Concept GHG Reduction Plan City of Edina: Municipal Spending and Rough Greenhouse Gas Estimate Updated: 2/7/16 Table 1: Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimate: City Operations Total Costs 9 Equivalencies Units/$Energy Units GHG Tonnes/Unit GHG Tonnes % of Budget % of GHG GHG TN/ 1000 $ Emission sources: Direct Burn / Energy Conversions / Territorial GHG Electricity (kWh) 1 $2,037,311 0.081 25,030,842 kWh 0.00048 12136 2.4% 26.6% 5.9566 Natural gas (therms) 2 $421,502 0.800 526,878 Therms 0.00550 2898 0.5% 6.4% 6.8743 Sewer/Water 3 $4,710,101 12,572,119 kWh 0.00063 7944 5.5% 17.4% 1.6867 Anthropogenic 6,662,417 kWh 0.00063 4210 Biogenic 5,909,702 kWh 0.00063 3734 Liquid fuels 4, 5 $479,197 147,717 1412 0.6% 3.1% 2.9466 Gasoline (US gal.) 9 88,654 88.65 1,000 gal 8.92 791 Diesel (US gal.) 9 59,063 59.06 1,000 gal 10.51 621 Solid waste management 7 $523,533 2.1 550 0.6% 1.2% 1.0500 Subtotal Scope 1,2 $8,171,645 24939 100.0%3.0519 Other costs / Outside ICELI Scope: Consumption Based / Supply Chain / Procurement GHG Personnel (FTE)$33,732,354 500 FTE 20 10000 39.6% 21.9% 0.2965 Professional Services $8,133,116 121 FTE 20 2411 9.5% 5.3% 0.2965 Communications Services $217,137 $ 0.35 38 0.3% 0.1% 0.1750 Materials $1,843,498 $ 0.75 691 2.2% 1.5% 0.3750 Goods / Services $4,130,918 $ 0.49 1012 4.8% 2.2% 0.2450 Equipment & Gov't CapX $14,985,889 $ 0.45 3372 17.6% 7.4% 0.2250 Enterprise CapX $14,000,000 $ 0.45 3150 16.4% 6.9% 0.2250 Subtotal Scope 3 $77,042,912 20674 Total $85,214,557 45613 100.0% Notes: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Source: City of Edina / http://coolclimate.berkeley.edu/business-calculator for Outside scope items. The purpose of this analysis is to use established conversion factors and data from other cities to derive a very approximate estimate of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with normal city government operations. Assumes 95% of costs are electricity based and 5% natural gas based per cities of Shorewood and Burnsville, 2013 (refer to Table 2). Source: Table G.12, International Local Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Protocol. Transportation fuels sold in Minnesota have blends of ethanol that are higher than the national average, thus, per-gallon GHG emissions will be relatively lower. From 2001 to 2005, the state required 10% ethanol in gasoline. From 2006 to the present, the state added the requirement of 5% ethanol in diesel fuels. Assumes the share of total emissions associated with solid waste management in Edina are comparable to the share in the cities of Burnsville and Shorewood (refer to Table 2). Assumes contract service for normal public works responsibilities in Edina are comparable to the share in the cities of Burnsville and Shorewood (refer to Table 2). Refer to Table 2 for comparison figures for the cities of Shorewood and Burnsville. Major Categories Average cost per kWh is from the city operations baseline assessment portion of the "Shorewood Renewable Energy Project, 2015." Data is for 2013. The source for the GHG emission rate is Xcel Energy for 2013. Source for cost per kWh: CenterPoint Energy. Downloaded from: Source for GHG emission factor: Table G.11, International Local Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Protocol , Version 1.1, May 2010. 0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 10 0 % % of Bu d g e t % of GH G % GH G / % Bu d g e t Ch a r t 1: Ci t y of Ed i n a / Ro u g h Gr e e n h o u s e Ga s Es t i m a t e By Ma j o r Ca t a g o r y of Expense El e c t r i c i t y (kWh) 1 Na t u r a l gas (therms) 2 Se w e r / W a t e r 3 Li q u i d fu e l s 4, 5 So l i d wa s t e management 7 Pe r s o n n e l (FTE) Pr o f e s s i o n a l Services Co m m u n i c a t i o n s Services Ma t e r i a l s Go o d s / Services Eq u i p m e n t & Gov't CapX En t e r p r i s e CapX Ta b l e 2 : F o o t p ri n t , I n d i c a t o r s , T o o l s a nd P o l i c i e s f o r S u s t a i n a b i l i t y b y M a j or C a t a g or i e s o f E x p en s e . Ma j o r C a t e g o r i e s N o t a b l e S e r v i c e s No t a b l e Fo o t p r i n t s In d i c a t o r s Mu n i c i p a l Or g a n i z a t i o n Po l i c y / T o o l s Ci t y w i d e Po l i c y / T o o l s Di r e c t B u r n / E n e r gy C o n v e r s i o n s / T e r r i t o r i a l G H G El e c t r i c i t y ( k W h ) 1 U t i l i t i e s , P a r k E n t e r p r i s e s G H G , L a n d B 3 , X c e l C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n Na t u r a l g a s ( t h e r m s ) 2 P a r k a n d G o v e r n m e n t G H G B 3 , C e n t e r p o i n t C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n Se w e r / W a t e r 3 S a n i t a r y U t i l i t y / M C E S W a t e r , G H G R I I , B 3 C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n CW R M P Li q u i d f u e l s 4 , 5 F l e e t , T r a n s p o r t a t i o n G H G , L a nd R I I , C i t y F l e e t R e p o r t C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n So l i d w a s t e m a n a g e m e n t 7 C o n t r a c t e d r e c y c l i n g L a n d So l i d W a s t e Co n s u m p ti o n B a s e d / S u pp l y C h a i n / P r o c u r e m e n t / P a t h w a y s Pe r s o n n e l ( F T E ) P u b l i c S a f e t y Pr o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s Co m m u n i c a t i o n s S e r v i c e s Ma t e r i a l s T r a n s p o r t a t i o n G H G , L a n d P r o c u r e m e n t P o l i c y Go o d s / S e r v i c e s Pr o c u r e m e n t P o l i c y Eq u i p m e n t & G o v ' t C a p X P a r k , F l e e t E n v i s i o n S c o r e E n v i s i o n , L i v i n g S t r e e t s E n v i s i o n , L i v i n g S t r e e t s En t e r p r i s e C a p X U t i l i t i e s , T r a s p o r t a t i o n L E E D , E n v i s i o n L E E D , E n v i s i o n L E E D , E n v i s i o n Ta b l e 3 : C o n c e p t u a l L e v e l / G r e e n h o u s e G a s E m i s s i o n R e d u c t i o n O p t i o n s : C i t y O p e r a t i o n s Po t e n t i a l G H G R e d u c t i o n S t r a t e g i e s Ap p r o x i m a t e On e T i m e / Ca p i t a l C o s t Ap p r o x i m a t e An n u a l C o s t Po s s i b l e Re d u c t i o n Po s s i b l e Re d u c t i o n (T o n n e s G H G ) Or g a n i z a t i o n - Wid e % E n e r g y Us e 10 y e a r $ C o s t o r ($ s a v i n g s ) / T o n n e s GH G R e d u c e d Notes Dir e c t B u r n / E n e r g y C o n v e r s i o n s / T e r r i t o r i a l G H G Bu i l d i n g E l e c t r i c i t y ( k W h ) En e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 % 7 0 4 1 . 5 % - 9 2 Bu i l d i n g c o n t i n u a l r e c o m m i s s i o n i n g ( e l e c t r i c ) $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 5 % 1 0 5 6 2 . 3 % - 7 1 Bu i l d i n g r e t r o f i t ( E l e c t r i c ) $ 4 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 3 0 % 2 1 1 2 4 . 6 % 7 1 Uti l i t y E l e c t r i c i t y Pu m p a n d l i f t o p t i m i z a t i o n $ 9 0 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 % 5 1 0 1 . 1 % 1 1 8 Ca p i t a l i n t e n s i v e t o c u t l o n g s e r v i c e l i f e s h o r t . Ne g o t i a t e r e n e w a b l e p u r c h a s e $ 0 $ 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 % 1 2 1 3 6 2 6 . 6 % 2 1 Ea s y t o d o , a d d s v a r i a b i l i t y i n p r i c e Dir e c t c a r b o n m a r k e t o f f s e t $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 % 1 2 1 3 6 2 6 . 6 % 1 6 Po t e n t i a l l y h i g h v a r i a b i l i t y i n p r i c e , p o s s i b l e t o i n c r e a s e s c a l e Xc e l C o n s e r v a t i o n T a r g e t $ 0 $ 0 3 0 % 3 6 4 1 8 . 0 % 0 Wil l h a p p e n b a s e d o n X c e l p l a n . Na t u r a l g a s d in g c o n t i n u a l r e c o m m i s s i o n i n g ( G a s ) $5 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 1 5 % 4 3 5 1 . 0 % - 9 2 Bu i l d i n g r e t r o f i t ( G a s ) $ 2 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 3 0 % 8 6 9 1 . 9 % 1 7 3 Co g e n e r a t i o n $ 2 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 5 0 % 1 4 4 9 3 . 2 % 3 5 Se w e r / W a t e r 3 Wa t e r C o n s e r v a t i o n $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 % 7 9 4 1 . 7 % 7 6 Th i s o p t i o n r e d u c e s E d i n a s h a r e o f M C E S l o a d a n d G H G , b u t w o u l d no t r e d u c e e l e c t r i c l o a d a t t r e a t m e n t p l a n t s u b s t a n t i a l l y b e c a u s e t o t a l wa s t e d e t e r m i n e s e n e r g y d e m a n d . Ne g o t i a t e p a s s t h o u g h r e n e w a b l e ( w a s t e w a t e r ) $ 0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 3 4 % 2 7 3 8 6 . 0 % 2 7 Sli g h t l y m o r e c o m p l e x d u e t o t h i r d p a r t y , b u t r e l a t i v e l y e a s y Ne g o t i a t e t o f u n d b i o g e n i c e f f i c i e n c y p r o j e c t $ 1 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 5 % 1 1 9 2 2 . 6 % 2 1 0 Li q u i d f u e l s 4 , 5 Fle e t m a n a g e m e n t / c o n s e r v a t i o n $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 % 1 4 1 0 . 3 % - 1 7 7 Ma y c o n f l i c t w i t h s e r v i c e l e v e l d e m a n d s Ve h i c l e e f f i c i e n c y g o a l $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 - $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 1 5 % 2 1 2 0 . 5 % - 7 1 So l i d w a s t e m a n a g e m e n t 7 Eff i c i e n c y p r o v i s i o n s i n c o n t r a c t $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 1 0 % 5 5 0 . 1 % 4 5 5 Op p o r t u n i t y c o m e s u p a t t i m e o f r e c y c l i n g c o n t r a c t Su b t o t a l S c o p e 1 , 2 Co n s u m p t i o n B a s e d / S u p p l y C h a i n / P r o c u r e m e n t G H G Pe r s o n n e l ( F T E ) N/A No a c t i o n a b l e p r a c t i c e s s u g g e s t e d Pr o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s N/A No a c t i o n a b l e p r a c t i c e s s u g g e s t e d Co m m u n i c a t i o n s S e r v i c e s N/A In t e r n a l p l u g l o a d o f s e r v e r s a n d c o m m u n i c a t i o n s i n e l e c t r i c a b o v e . Ma t e r i a l s Pr o c u r e m e n t P o l i c y GH G n o t q u a n t i f i e d i n p o l i c y Go o d s / S e r v i c e s Pr o c u r e m e n t P o l i c y GH G n o t q u a n t i f i e d i n p o l i c y Eq u i p m e n t & G o v ' t C a p X LE E D a n d E n v i s i o n In f r a s t r u c t u r e t h a t s e r v e s t h e c o m m u n i t y c a n e f f e c t c o m m u n i t y w i d e fu t u r e d e m a n d . En t e r p r i s e C a p X LE E D a n d E n v i s i o n Pr o j e c t s w i t h s m a l l o n e - t i m e i m p a c t t o G H G c a n d e t e r m i n e f u t u r e fu e l i n p u t s . Ma j o r C a t e g o r i e s Ta b l e 4 : C o n c e p tu a l L e v e l / G r e e n h o u s e G a s E m i s s i o n R e d u c t i o n P l a n : C i t y O p er a t i o n s Ex a m p l e R e d u c t i o n s R e c o m m e n d e d 2 0 1 5 - 2 0 2 5 A c t i o n s f o r 5 0 % r e d u c t i o n Pe r c e n t C u m u l a t i v e % R e d u c t i o n C u m u l a t i v e R e d u c t i o n S t r a t e g y 10 % 4 5 6 1 8 . 0 % 8 . 0 % 3 6 4 1 3 6 4 1 X c e l C o n s e r v a t i o n T a r g e t 20 % 9 1 2 3 9 . 5 % 1 . 5 % 4 3 4 5 7 0 4 E n e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n 20 2 5 G o a l 3 0 % 1 3 6 8 4 1 1 . 8 % 2 . 3 % 5 4 0 0 1 0 5 6 B u i l d i n g c o n t i n u a l r e c o m m i s s i o n i n g ( e l e c t r i c ) 40 % 1 8 2 4 5 1 2 . 8 % 1 . 0 % 5 8 3 5 4 3 5 B u i l d i n g c o n t i n u a l r e c o m m i s s i o n i n g ( G a s ) 50 % 2 2 8 0 7 3 9 . 4 % 2 6 . 6 % 1 7 9 7 0 1 2 1 3 6 N e g o t i a t e r e n e w a b l e p u r c h a s e 60 % 2 7 3 6 8 3 9 . 9 % 0 . 5 % 1 8 1 8 2 2 1 2 V e h i c l e e f f i c i e n c y g o a l 70 % 3 1 9 2 9 4 4 . 5 % 4 . 6 % 2 0 2 9 4 2 1 1 2 B u i l d i n g r e t r o f i t ( E l e c t r i c ) 20 5 0 G o a l 8 0 % 3 6 4 9 1 5 0 . 5 % 6 . 0 % 2 3 0 3 1 2 7 3 8 N e g o t i a t e p a s s t h o u g h r e n e w a b l e ( w a s t e w a t e r ) 90 % 4 1 0 5 2 5 0 . 8 % 0 . 3 % 2 3 1 7 3 1 4 1 F l e e t m a n a g e m e n t / c o n s e r v a t i o n CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN Appendix 5: School Facilities At the District level, the lighting standard for replacement and installation is LED. All new construction will use LED lighting. Building management systems are being installed, allowing for control of all building units, giving the ability to shut buildings off and decrease electricity consumption. For paving projects, the District is using an Under Ground Water Retention System to hold rainwater back. Fertilizer usage for District grounds has been reduced by one third, as well as a reduction in salt distribution with eight staff members having been trained and certified through the MPCA Salt Distribution Certification. When re-roofing facilities, the District has committed to adding considerable insulation that will result in less heat loss. Architecturally, the District has committed to a roofing requirement of R-30 minimum, with 5 ½” base plus roof slope for drainage. Walls will have a minimum of R-13 wall assembly and 2.5” of insulation. Low-e Argon filled energy efficient glazing will be used. All paints are required to meet low VOC Green Seal Standards, with exceptions for special epoxy or stains. The District encourages skylights to provide natural lighting to interior spaces. The District has also committed to several mechanically-oriented sustainable strategies. High efficiency condensing boilers will be installed to serve the new building addition; there is a plan for future building-wide conversion from steam to hot water. The hot water temperature will be re-set based on outside air temperature. Variable speed pumps with premium efficiency motors for hot and chilled water distribution will be used, and water chillers will be selected to exceed code minimum efficiency standards. A cooling tower sump basin will be used to minimize cooling tower water treatment. High efficiency condensing hot water heating plants will be used. In new additions, perimeter fin tubs will be used for unoccupied heating. Air handling units serving classrooms will have total heat recovery. Large volume spaces, including game gymnasiums, will be provided with variable speed fans for multiple modes of operation to save energy. High volume spaces will be provided with de-stratification fans. There is a planned building wide conversion from constant volume reheat air delivery to variable air volume. Carbon dioxide control of outside air volumes will be used to prevent over-ventilation during low occupancy periods. Building Automation Systems controls will be installed for enhanced control, monitoring of system performance, alarm logs, and trending to aid in troubleshooting. Electrical sustainability strategies include using robust lighting controls for LED fixtures, including dimmable fixtures, daylight harvesting, and manual on-switching. Occupancy sensors will be used t conserve energy. There will be time of day scheduling used for lighting in common areas and exterior lighting. District-wide exterior lighting is being systematically replaced with LED. The District also plans to install photovoltaic solar panels on the high school on an educational scale. A larger solar plant is being investigated for the new transportation building site. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN Appendix 6: Focus Area Options Considered by the Planning Team The Energy Action Team considered a variety of focus areas before voting on the final five, which later evolved into a final three. The following list outlines several of the focus areas considered by the team. Residential Brainstormed Focus Areas Information Campaign There are more than 22,560 housing units in Edina (2010 US Census), and many potential energy savings actions that could be promoted. Windsource® Almost 700 households have enrolled in Windsource®. In 2014, Windsource® cost $0.68 per block (100 kWh) per month. For the lowest residential user in Edina, the cost would be $21.36/year, and the highest would be $258.40/year. Residential Redevelopment Edina issued more than 100 home building permits this year and a similar number last year. There were 46 Edina Energy Star Homes participants in 36 months, with average savings of 1,360 kWh. Schools/Service Learning There are 8,500 students at Edina schools, and almost a third of Edina households have children under the age of 18. The school also has a green team. Opportunities would be to leverage the May projects for high school seniors. Feedback-based Neighborhood Competition There are nine registered neighborhoods in Edina (Normandale, Pamela Park, Strachauer Park, Morningside, Countryside, Concord, Arden Park, Chowen Park, Creek Knoll), and they represent 24% of Edina’s residential energy use. Feedback-based School Competition As we researched neighborhood competitions, this came up as an alternative. There are six elementary schools with rough geographic enrollment areas. There are 3,752 elementary students. Competition can be inspiring, and families may be connected to their schools more so than neighborhoods. Youth Sports Teams There are many youth sports teams, including 90 at the high school. Some sports teams have service hours. Distribution of materials at sports games has been ineffective in the past. Neighborhood Association Engagement There are nine registered neighborhoods in Edina, and they represent 24% of Edina’s residential energy use. In 2010, the Morningside Neighborhood Association helped to distribute information about Home Energy Squad visits. CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN Business Brainstormed Focus Areas Information Campaign There are more than 4,000 businesses in Edina and several potential energy actions that could be promoted. Businesses make up 66% of Edina’s electricity usage. Outreach Through Organizations There are several active business organizations in Edina, including the Chamber of Commerce (400 members), Rotary Club (160+), and 50th and France organization. Target the Retail Sector There are several retail businesses in Edina, including at 50th and France, Southdale, the Galleria, and Centennial Lakes Plaza. A recent lighting project saved a Galleria store ~50% in electricity costs. Retail locations could be targeted geographically and through organizations. Business Recognition and Awards There are many businesses to target, but this would require extensive awareness building to be successful. There are many electricity-savings actions that could be encouraged. Windsource® In 2014, Windsource® cost $0.68 per block (100 kWh). Average commercial consumption in Edina is about 15,000 kWh monthly, so an entire usage subscription would cost approximately $102/month with current Windsource® premiums. Target the Healthcare Sector Fairview Southdale hospital is a large facility that has already won awards for sustainability. There are many clinics and medical offices in the Edina as well, and they could be targeted geographically. Healthcare in general is a very energy intensive sector. Other Brainstormed Focus Areas Leverage School New Construction and Maintenance Projects There are opportunities for efficiency and renewables in school projects, and a $125M bond measure was passed in May to renovate schools. Leverage a Campaign Like Edina Unplugged There are many businesses and residents in Edina that could be reached and this could work as an awareness campaign tactic. Build Recognition of Edina as an Energy-Conscious City The City is already enrolled in ICLEI, GreenStep Cities, and the US Mayor’s Climate Protection Agreement. Leverage Existing Environmental Action Groups in the Community There are a few environmental action groups in Edina—Citizen’s Climate Lobby, Cool Planet, and a school-associated group, Project Earth. Target Hennepin County Facilities Energy Use There are two Hennepin County facilities in Edina. Southdale Service Center, which includes a library, and the Edina Library. In 2015, there was an article that discussed the possibility of moving the Southdale Service Center. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IV.C. Scott H. Neal, City Manager ☒ ☐ ☐ June 17, 2015 Partners in Energy Program Motion to approve Memorandum of Understanding with Xcel Energy regarding the City’s participation in Xcel Energy’s Partners in Energy program. Information / Background: Xcel Energy has selected the City of Edina to participate in its Partners in Energy program. The broad purpose of the program is to assist and support communities develop and implement an energy action plan that is designed to meet the communities’ individual energy needs. To be part of the program, the City must approve a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Xcel Energy. Xcel commits to the following in the MOU: assistance identifying and recruiting stakeholders; analysis of community energy use and program participation; facilitation of planning sessions; training and guidance developing goals and strategies; documentation and delivery of the energy action plan; and commitment to completing the plan development. The City agrees to the following in the MOU: establishing a single point of contact; providing facilities for meetings; providing access to existing energy-related plans and programs; involvement in developing implementation strategies; commitment to completing the plan development; agreement that the energy plan resulting from this work will be available to the public. Participation in this program is consistent with the overall work plan of the Energy & Environment Commission and is supportive of the Council’s previous direction on energy conservation policy issues. I briefed the EEC’s Climate Commitment Team on this opportunity. They enthusiastically endorsed the City’s participation in the program. The City Attorney has reviewed the MOU and has no concerns with the agreement. I recommend the City Council approve the requested motion approving the proposed Partners in Energy program Memorandum of Understanding. XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Plan Development Phase 1 Memorandum of Understanding Phase 1 – Plan Development Mr. Scott Neal Edina City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Congratulations on being selected to participate in Xcel Energy’s Partners in Energy. This offering is designed to provide your community with the tools and resources necessary to develop and implement an energy action plan that reflects the vision your community has for shaping energy use and supply in its future. Participation is intended to span 24 months with the initial 4-6 months dedicated to developing of a strategic energy action plan and the remaining time focused on the implementing that plan. The intent of this Memorandum of Understanding is to confirm the City of Edina’s intent to participate in the initial plan development phase of Partners in Energy and outline the commitment that your community and Xcel Energy are making to this collaborative initiative. The primary objective of this phase of the offering is to develop your energy action plan. In order to achieve this Xcel Energy will provide: Consulting support to assist in identifying potential community stakeholders, and constructing or delivering an invitation or informational announcement regarding the planning process. Data analysis of community energy use and Xcel Energy program participation to the extent that it is legally and technically prudent and feasible. The results can be used to identify potential opportunities to implement plan strategies. Xcel Energy will attempt to integrate data provided by the City of Edina into the analysis if feasible. XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Plan Development Phase 2 Professional facilitation of 3-5 plan development work sessions with the community stakeholder group to develop the energy action plan’s vision, focus areas, goals and implementation strategies. Assistance as needed in synthesizing the community and program data collected with the vision of the community to identify attainable goals that align with suitable strategies and tactics. Development of the documented energy action plan that will incorporate inputs from the stakeholder planning team and will be accessible to the community. Commitment to delivering an actionable and complete energy action plan within six months of City of Edina and Xcel Energy signing this MOU. Although participation in the Plan Development phase of Partners in Energy requires no monetary contribution, the community, the City of Edina, does agree to provide: A single contact point to work with recruiting stakeholders, coordinating planning meeting logistics, and coordinate distribution of deliverables and lead participation of the community. Meeting facilities to host the stakeholder group during development of the plan. Identification of existing community energy plans or programs that could be leveraged in successful development and delivery of this plan. Good-faith evaluation of the recommendations and analysis provided and fair consideration of the potential strategies and tactics identified that align with the comity’s goals. Commitment to delivering an actionable and complete energy plan within six months of the City of Edina and Xcel Energy signing this MOU. Public distribution of the work products developed with the support of Xcel Energy’s Partners in Energy. XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Plan Development Phase 3 Resource Commitment Summary Plan Development Phase City of Edina Xcel Energy Single point of contact Meeting facilities Access to existing energy-related plans and programs Involvement in developing implementation strategies Commitment to completing the plan development Agreement that the energy plan resulting from this work will be available to the public Assistance identifying and recruiting stakeholders Analysis of community energy use and program participation Facilitation of planning sessions Training and guidance developing goals and strategies Documentation and delivery of the energy action plan Commitment to completing the plan development The Memorandum of Understanding for the Implementation Phase of Partners in Energy will be developed upon completion of your energy action plan and will outline your goals and the resource commitment from Xcel Energy and the City of Edina. All communications pertaining to this agreement shall be directed to Scott Neal, on behalf of the City of Edina and Tami Gunderzik on behalf of Xcel Energy. Thank you again for your continued interest in Xcel Energy’s Partner in Energy. We look forward to assisting the City of Edina in the development of an action energy plan. For the City of Edina: _________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________ For Xcel Energy: ________________________________________ Date: ___________________________________ Energy Action Planning at a Glance | 11 Appendix – Resources Minnesota Residential Studies, Audits and Services Efficiency Type Deliverable Description Gas or Electric Study Rebate Service Billing and Payment My Account with eBill My Account is Xcel Energy’s online account management service that provides customers with a personalized summary of their account. Features include eBill, eBill payment, usage history, account info, product/program offers, energy efficiency info, and the customer preference center. E G Service Fuel Conversions Switch from propane or fuel oil to natural gas Convert your primary fuel in your home and save. Potential construction charge for distances from distribution gas line greater than 75 ft and one-time account set-up charge. G (in area)Service Home Audits Home Energy Savings Program After an in-home evaluation, qualifying residents may be eligible for services and equipment that include CFL bulb upgrades, insulation and weather stripping, appliance replacements and other equipment and appliances, E G Service Low-Cost Home Energy Audits Home Walkthrough – Whole-house visual inspection and basic energy bill analysis for $30. Standard Audit – Home Walkthrough plus blower door test for $60. Standard audit with Infrared – Standard Audit plus an infrared camera scan for $100 (where available). E G Audits Home Services Home Energy Squad® Low-cost service to provide and install efficient items such as compact fluorescent light bulbs, programmable thermostats, weather stripping and more. Must have natural gas service from Xcel Energy or CenterPoint Energy ($70). E G (CenterPoint Energy gas) Service Home Performance with ENERGY STAR® By installing multiple measures after a $60 energy audit, natural gas customers are eligible for cash rebates.E G Audits Saver’s Switch® During peak air conditioning use days, participating residents can save 15% off of their electric energy use June through Septemberby allowing a lowering of energy use from their AC units. E G Services Rebates New Home Construction ENERGY STAR Homes Free home performance testing, inspections and consulting services to help meet the ENERGY STAR guidelines set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We conduct regular site inspections and arrange an independent inspection at completion to ensure homes meet all required builder rebates. E G Study 12 | Xcel Energy | Partners in Energy Minnesota Residential Rebate Programs Efficiency Type Deliverable Description Gas or Electric Study Rebate Service Cooling Efficiencies Central Air Conditioning and Air Source Heat Pumps Our Central AC Rebate program is designed to generate maximum energy savings for residents by focusing on proper installation practices. Qualifying equipment and installations may earn up to $450 cash rebates. Must be installed by a contractor registered in Xcel Energy’s Cooling program. E Rebate Ground Source Heat Pumps Qualifying ENERGY STAR ground source heat pumps are eligible for a cash rebate of $150 per ton (five ton limit). Must be installed by a contractor registered in Xcel Energy’s Cooling program. E Rebate Environmental Refrigerator/Freezer Recycling We pick up resident’s old working, second fridge or freezer and recycle it free of charge as well as give a $50 cash rebate and two compact fluorescent light bulbs.E Rebate Service CFL Bulb Recycling Compact Fluorescent Lights (CFLs) contain small amounts of mercury that are harmful to the environment. Because of this, they should not be disposed in household trash receptacles. Xcel Energy provides free CFL recycling at participating retailers and Minnesota county recycling centers. E Service Heating Efficiencies Heating/ECM Rebates Qualifying natural gas boiler, gas furnace or factory installed Electronically Commutated Motor (ECM) are eligible for cash rebates. E G Rebate Water Heating Rebates Qualifying energy-efficient water heaters can earn rebates.G Rebate Insulation Rebates Well-insulated homes can save up to 20% on heating and cooling costs. Rebates for 20% of project cost with a $300 annual cap. Insulation upgrades existing single-family and multi-unit homes, up to four units, that professionally install insulation. Additional restrictions may apply. G E (electric heat) Rebate Lighting Efficiencies Home Lighting Energy-efficient compact fluorescent light bulbs and light-emitting diodes can be purchased at a discount at participating retailers.E Rebate Some restrictions apply; programs and rebates are subject to change. Please see program application forms official program details, terms and conditions. Minnesota Residential Renewable Options Deliverable Description Fuel Type Existing or New Study Rebate Service Solar*Rewards®Community® A developer or a community installs a solar garden. Residents purchase or lease shares and receive credit on their monthly Xcel Energy electricity bills for their portion of solar energy produced by the solar gardens. E E N Service Solar*Rewards®Residents receive incentives for installation of photovoltaic (PV) solar panels. The state of Minnesota may offer an additional rebate if you buy solar panels from Minnesota manufacturers.E E N Service Windsource®Residents can purchase renewable, wind energy through Windsource. Subscriptions start at less than $1 per month for one, 100-kilowatt-hour block*.E E N Service Some restrictions apply; programs and rebates are subject to change. Please see program application forms official program details, terms and conditions. Energy Action Planning at a Glance | 13 Minnesota Business Audits, Studies & Services Deliverable Description Gas or Electric Study Rebate Service Business New Construction Energy Design Assistance* An integrated design process that includes whole building computer modeling and verification of measures for new buildings, additions or major renovations. Finished space 20,000 sq. ft. or larger G E Study Rebates Business New Construction Energy Efficient Buildings* Free design review to identify potential rebates and energy-saving opportunities, plus rebates for making efficiency improvements to your new building, addition or major renovation. Finished space smaller than 20,000 sq. ft. E G Study Rebates Commercial Efficiency*Operations and facilities analysis and support to help large commercial operations create a long-term energy management plan. (Designed for energy conservation potential of 1 GWh or 4,000 Dth)E G Study Rebate Data Center Efficiency Study*Data center energy efficiency analysis and identification of opportunities to improve IT equipment and/or facility systems to run at peak efficiency E G Study Rebate Free Online Assessment For businesses unsure of investing in an on-site energy audit, we have a FREE online energy assessment tool that offers a basic report on hidden energy-savings potential: xcelenergy.com/OnlineAssessment E G Tool Fluid System Optimization* (Compressed Air, Pumps, Fans, Blowers, Vacuums) Rebates for a study to analyze your fluid systems to discover no-cost/low-cost improvements as well as identify capital projects to increase your system’s efficiency, reliability and performance E Study Rebate Heating Efficiency Steam Trap Audits and Rebates Identify failed traps and benefit from cost-saving rebates to repair or replace traps G Study Rebate Heating Efficiency System Optimization Study* Analyze all or part of heating system to uncover and/or assess natural gas savings opportunities, including no-/low-cost adjustments and/or equipment improvements G Study Lighting Redesign Study*A complete lighting analysis to identify ways to Improve your lighting efficiency in over-lit or wrongly-lit spaces. (Not for 1-to-1 lighting retrofits; must be performed by a certified lighting professional)E Study Rebates Process Efficiency*Operations and facilities analysis to help create a long-term energy management plan. Industrial manufacturing customers must have cumulative energy conservation potential of 1 GWh or 4,000 Dth E G Study Rebate Recommissioning* Energy experts conduct a Recommissioning study and provide recommendations for building tune-ups. Many measures have simple paybacks of less than one year. Choose what to implement and get rebates on both the study and implementation measure(s) E G Study Rebates Refrigeration Recommissioning* Rebates for tuning up existing commercial refrigeration systems in grocery outlets, convenience stores and other facilities with refrigerated cases E Study Rebates Turn Key Services Low-cost, on-site assessments that identify energy-saving opportunities for community businesses. Includes free project implementation services and 30% bonus rebates on rebate-eligible improvements made within 12 months from assessment date. If businesses already have energy-saving projects identified, they can still take advantage of our free implementation services E G Study Service Rebates My Account with eBill My Account is Xcel Energy’s online account management service that provides business customers with a summary of their account to help manage energy. Features include eBill, eBill payment, usage history, account info, product/program offers, energy efficiency info, and the customer preference center E G Services PERSONALIZED BUSINESS ACCOUNT SERVICES Our efficiency specialists are your go-to support for your businesses’ energy needs, available to: • Answer questions • Suggest energy recommendations tailored to your business • Help you navigate program options, requirements and documentation • Discuss different ways to get started Contact your Xcel Energy account manager, or our energy efficiency specialists at 1-855-839-4362 or energyefficiency@xcelenergy.com. Services Trillion BTU Financing Loan program that leverages public and private money to help businesses make improvements that lower energy costs. Delivered by St. Paul Port Authority.Service *Requires preapproval prior to starting the project or study. Some restrictions apply; programs and rebates are subject to change. Please see program application forms official program details, terms and conditions. 14 | Xcel Energy | Partners in Energy Minnesota Business Rebate Programs Deliverable Description Gas or Electric Study Rebate Service Cooling Efficiency Rebates for energy-efficient air conditioning equipment including rooftops, chillers, water source heat pumps, zero-loss energy doors, PTACs and more E Rebate ComputerEfficiency Rebates available for virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) or PC power management software E Rebate Custom Efficiency*Rebates for energy-efficient technologies or process improvements not covered under our prescriptive programs E G Rebate Data Center Efficiency Equipment Rebates*Custom rebates for opportunities identified through a Data Center study E Rebate Efficiency Controls*Rebates for control systems that save energy by automating building systems such as lighting, HVAC and others E Rebate Fluid System Optimization*Rebates for efficiency improvements from upgraded equipment identified in a fluid system optimization study E Rebate Foodservice Equipment Cash-back rebates for purchasing and installing qualifying energy-efficient foodservice equipment such as convection ovens, broilers, demand controlled ventilation, ENERGY STAR dishwashers and more E G Rebate Heating Efficiency Prescriptive rebates for qualifying commercial heating systems used for space heating, domestic water heating and up to 30% additional process load E G Rebate Lighting Efficiency Retrofit Rebates Rebates for purchasing and installing energy-efficient lighting in an existing building E Rebate Lighting Efficiency New Construction Rebates Rebates for purchasing and installing energy-efficient lighting for new or significantly renovated facilities E Rebate Motor and Drive Efficiency Prescriptive and custom rebates for installing variable frequency drives (VFD), adjustable speed drives (ASD) and Constant Speed Motor Controllers. Motor rebates are available for NEMA Premium® enhanced new, upgrade and enhanced upgrade motors E Rebate *Requires preapproval prior to starting the project or study. Some restrictions apply; programs and rebates are subject to change. Please see program application forms official program details, terms and conditions. Minnesota Business Renewable Options Deliverable Description Fuel Type Existing or New Study Rebate Service Solar*Rewards Rebates based on energy production for installing solar panels on your business. Participation is limited. Additional incentive may be available through the Made in Minnesota program. Additional payment available for excess energy produced. E E N Service Windsource Businesses can purchase renewable energy through Windsource. Subscriptions start at less than $1 per month, for one, 100 kilowatt-hour block.*E E N Service CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN Appendix 10: Detailed Program Participation and Associated Savings Residential Programs Xcel Energy Residential Program Savings Information Program Participants (2013) Participants (2014) Average MN kWh Savings per Year ENERGY STAR Homes 21 12 943 Heating System Rebates 250 193 621 Home Energy Audits 15 19 Indirect savings Home Energy Squad 82 116 820* Insulation Rebate 0 2 1,064 Refrigerator Recycling 138 165 1,036 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Residential Efficiency Programs * indicates programs for low income customers ** indicates Edina-specific savings Average MN kWh Savings per Year Participants (2013-2014) kW h S a v i n g s P a r t i c i p a n t s CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN Residential Cooling 338 330 496 School Education Kits (Available for 4th and 5th grade classrooms) n/a n/a 98 Residential Saver's Switch 438 790 8 *Edina-specific savings average Xcel Energy Low Income Program Savings Information Program Participants (2013) Participants (2014) Average MN kWh Savings per Year Home Energy Savings Program 10 14 386 Multi-Family Energy Savings Program* 0 0 1,042 *Separate from the recently launched Multi-Family Building Efficiency program. Business Programs 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 Business Efficiency Programs * indicates programs for the largest/industrial customers Average MN kWh Savings / Year Participants (2013-2014) kW h S a v i n g s P a r t i c i p a n t s CITY OF EDINA ENERGY ACTION PLAN Xcel Energy Commercial Program Savings Information Program Participants (2013) Participants (2014) Average MN kWh Savings per Year Business New Construction 1 2 457,204 *Commercial Efficiency 0 0 410,192 Computer Efficiency 1 2 3,987 Cooling Efficiency 33 38 6,009 *Custom Efficiency 2 1 129,790 Data Center Efficiency 1 0 538,633 Efficiency Controls 5 1 179,315 Fluid Systems Optimization 1 3 28,197 Foodservice Equipment 0 1 9,469 Lighting Efficiency 42 31 62,469 Motor Efficiency 12 9 38,363 *Process Efficiency 0 0 731,035 Recommissioning 1 1 89,923 *Self-Direct 0 0 926,303 Turn Key Services 5 1 18,333 Electric Rate Savings 0 0 3,532 Saver's Switch for Business 18 9 17 Small Business Lighting 51 59 23,019 *Indicates programs for largest/industrial customers XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Implementation Phase 1 Memorandum of Understanding Phase 2: Implementation Mr. Scott Neal Edina City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 The intent of this Memorandum of Understanding is to recognize the achievement of the City of Edina in completing the process of developing a city-wide energy action plan. Xcel Energy, through its Partners in Energy offering has supported the development of this energy action plan. This document will outline how the City of Edina and Xcel Energy will continue to work together to support the community as they implement the plan. The term of this joint support, as defined in this document, will extend from August 1, 2016 until March 31, 2018. This is a voluntary agreement and not intended to be legally binding for either party. Xcel Energy will support the City of Edina in achieving the goals of the energy action plan, by area of focus, in the following ways: • Municipal Facilities: o Provide technical support and analysis to assist in the identification of potential paths forward once the current building study conducted by CR-BPS is complete. o Assist in identifying and analyzing different options to purchase renewable energy for municipal electricity use. Provide research on the path forward other municipalities in the state are taking to achieve renewable energy goals. o Support funded by Xcel Energy for this focus area is not to exceed 20 hours. These hours will include those provided through our Partners in Energy team from the Center for Energy and Environment and does not include support provided by Xcel Energy internal staff. • Residential Information Campaign: o Help drive traffic to a City operated web resource through City communications channels. § Provide technical content materials and support the development of messaging on the website for energy efficiency, renewables and Xcel Energy programs and services. XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Implementation Phase 2 § Research and report on best practice expertise on community outreach, specifically in reaching residential energy users. § Develop an introductory co-branded email (City of Edina and Xcel Energy) to introduce the Edina Energy Action Plan and the web resource and provide distribution to residential Xcel Energy customers in the City of Edina using the systems and email addresses Xcel Energy has available. o Foster neighborhood-based outreach and leadership. § Provide neighborhood level data and mapping as appropriate. § Assist in the development of marketing materials and social media tools and resources. § Create data-driven information resources to integrate into the City of Edina web resources that identify the dollar and environmental impacts of changes made in energy consumption, based on local tracking. o Leverage outreach events for Windsource sign-ups and education. § Assist in developing and delivering messaging and marketing materials specific to the City of Edina. § Provided targeted co-branded email to City of Edina residents to promote WindSource. § Provide $500 towards a tablet or lap top computer to provide online access at tabling events to enable onsite program sign-up. This includes the online application for WindSource currently available on Xcelenergy.com. The City of Edina will be responsible for providing the internet access for the technology selected. o Assess and recommend policy options to support efficiency for Edina residents. § Report on what other communities are doing through policy changes to reduce greenhouse gases as they relate to electricity consumption by residents. o Support funded by Xcel Energy for this focus area is not to exceed 120 hours. These hours will include those provided through our Partners in Energy team from the Center for Energy and Environment and does not include support provided by Xcel Energy internal staff. • Business Energy: o Engage top business energy users to take action on greenhouse gasses through offsets and electricity usage reduction. § Provide support segmenting and prioritizing top energy users to the degree possible given data privacy guidelines. § Provide information and updates on renewable energy options for business customers. XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Implementation Phase 3 § Assist in the development of marketing materials and outreach to these key customers. Identify best practices in engaging large businesses and development of key messaging for marketing collateral. Develop materials that provide information on the impacts achieved through changes in energy consumption. § Leverage Xcel Energy account management to provide communication and support to Edina’s largest account-managed businesses. § Provide up to $1,000 funding for an outreach event. These dollars can’t be used towards alcohol or to subsidize any technology or offering already covered under an existing Xcel Energy program or service. o Target small to mid-sized businesses through a recognition program. § Perform research and report on best practices and critical success factors for a small businesses recognition program. § Provide support in segmenting Edina businesses to target for outreach and participation in a recognition program. § Assist in the design and review of marketing and program materials. Provide development support of recognition materials for participants potentially including decals, plaques, case studies and advertisements. § Provide up to $1,000 funding for outreach event or business recognition. These dollars can’t be used towards alcohol or to subsidize any technology or offering already covered under an existing Xcel Energy program or service. o Assess and recommend policy options to support greenhouse gas reduction for Edina businesses as they relate to electricity consumption. § Report on what other communities are doing through policy changes to reduce greenhouse gases as they relate to electricity consumption by businesses. o Support funded by Xcel Energy for this focus area is not to exceed 125 hours. These hours will include those provided through our Partners in Energy team from the Center for Energy and Environment and does not include support provided by Xcel Energy internal staff. • Additional support: o Quarterly tracking and reporting on Xcel Energy program participation by the businesses and residents in Edina. o Provide $500 of social media advertising targeted at Edina residents or businesses to drive them to the City of Edina web resource, Xcel Energy’s WindSource program, or conservation programs. o Provide up to $3,000 in printing, production, postage or ad placement budget in relation to the promotion and delivery of the City of Edina’s energy action plan. This can include materials and supplies to support tabling and outreach events. XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Implementation Phase 4 o Upon achievement of the energy conservation goals outlined below by the date March 31, 2018, and incremental activity measured from a baseline developed by averaging 2014 and 2015 activity, Xcel Energy will provide funding to the City of Edina up to $7,500 to support conservation programs delivered by the City, with the understanding that the City will provide matching dollars to the programs being funded. Conservation activity will be measured through participation in Xcel Energy’s DSM programs. Focus Area Incremental Conservation Goal (in kWh) Municipal 890,000 Residential 840,000 Business* 2,200,000 Total 3,930,000 Conservation goal for the Business Focus area was defined by assuming 75% of the electricity offset would be achieved through conservation. The City of Edina commits to supporting the Energy Action Plan to the best of its ability by: • Achieving the conservation impacts and renewable energy choices outlined in the City of Edina Energy Action Plan. By focus area these goals are: o Municipal Facilities – lower electricity greenhouse gas emissions by 7.5% by March 31, 2018 including achieving electric energy conservation reductions of 890,000 kwh. o Residential – Based on average activity in 2014 and 2015, achieve an incremental 9,240,000 kWh offsets, including 840,000 kWh electric energy conservation, by March 31, 2018. o Business - Based on average activity in 2014 and 2015, achieve an incremental 2,940,000 kWh offsets, including 2,200,000 kWh electric energy conservation, by March 31, 2018. • Performing the coordination, tracking, and outreach duties as outlined in the Energy Action Plan. These tasks by area of focus, include but are not limited to: o Municipal Facilities : § Review building study report and prioritize projects for implementation. § Research outside funding opportunities to fund implementation. § Research opportunities to partners with education organizations. § Assist in the development of the business case for greenhouse gas reduction options. § Assess renewable purchase options, present findings to the Energy and Environment Commission and City Council, and implement based on results. XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Implementation Phase 5 o Residential Information Campaign: § Program and maintain website, update and refine content and layout of the site. § Implement distribution of energy related messaging, including calls for action pertaining to conservation and renewables, through City channels. § Research tools to be shared through the web site that provide residents the ability to monitor and reduce energy consumption § Act as a point of contact for interested leaders within the City for information and materials to support opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. § Support maintenance of events calendar and volunteer coordination for tabling, and tabling supplies, for outreach events. § Coordinate with the Energy and Environment Commission and Xcel Energy on options for potential policy options. o Business Energy: § Lead direct business outreach in coordination with the Energy and Environment Commission and Xcel Energy. § Drive messaging to the market by helping to refine messaging and marketing materials to reach businesses, coordinating with local business organizations to perform outreach, and maintaining the website content as it pertains to Edina businesses. § Lead development and administer a campaign that provides recognition to large energy users for their efforts to reduce greenhouse gases. Incorporate City leadership into the delivery mechanism for recognition. § Coordinate the development and administer outreach and recognition materials to identify local small to mid-sized business engaged in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Create a recommended list of energy tracking tools and software for consideration by businesses pursuing energy reduction. § Coordinate with the Energy and Environment Commission and Xcel Energy on options for potential policy options. • Develop the City of Edina’s communication resources to host information on the Edina Energy Action Plan, inform and motivate Edina residents to take action, and provide the public updates regarding participation opportunities and tracking achievements. This may include communication vehicles such as the City’s web resource and city newsletters. • Providing a single point of coordination and necessary staff time to ensure continued active support for strategy implementation. • Continuing to provide feedback and coordination with the Energy and Environment Commission and their working groups supporting implementation of the plan. XCEL ENERGY PARTNERS IN ENERGY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Memorandum of Understanding Implementation Phase 6 • Providing Xcel Energy an opportunity to review marketing materials to assure accuracy when they incorporate the Xcel Energy logo or reference Xcel Energy’s or any of its products or services. • Sharing the collateral, energy action plan document, supporting work documents and implementation results from the City of Edina with the public. The experience, successes and lessons learned from this community will inform others looking at similar or expanded initiatives. All communications pertaining to this agreement shall be directed to Tara Brown on behalf of the City of Edina and Tami Gunderzik on behalf of Xcel Energy. Xcel Energy is excited about this opportunity to support the City of Edina in advancing their goals around energy. The resources outlined above and provided through Partners in Energy are provided as a part of our commitment to the communities we serve and Xcel Energy’s support of energy-efficiency and renewables as important resources to meet your future energy needs. For the City of Edina: For Xcel Energy: Scott Neal City Manager Pat Cline Director, Customer and Community Relations Date: Date: Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Fred Richards Park Planning Process Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve desired planning selection process and approve staff to move forward with plan. INTRODUCTION: Funding from the 2016 capital improvement plan (CIP) was identified for a Fred Richards planning initiative. Staff would like to present four options for conducting the planning initiative to the City Council. Those options are as follows: 1. Noncompetitive Selection 2. Competitive RFI/RFQ 3. Competitive RFP 4. Design Competition City Staff is recommending option number 3 and has provided the rationale in the staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Fred Richards Park Planning Process July 19, 2016 Mayor and City Council Scott Neal, City Manager Fred Richards Park Planning Process Information / Background: Golf operations at the Fred Richards Golf Course were closed at the end of the 2014 season. As part of the conversion plan from golf course to park, the City Council asked staff to facilitate a planning process for the design of the new Fred Richards Park. Staff have identified funding for such a planning initiative in the 2016 capital improvement plan (CIP) and wish to present options for conducting the planning initiative to the City Council at the Council’s 2019 meeting. Those options are as follows: 1. Noncompetitive Selection 2. Competitive RFI/RFQ 3. Competitive RFP 4. Design Competition Before getting into the details of the various options, I thought it might be helpful to define my terms more clearly. I found the following definitions of RFI, RFQ and RFP online from a med-tech business writer named Dennis Stevenson. Request for Information The RFI is the least formal and makes the smallest commitment about what you intend to do at the end of the process. An RFI is designed to collect information from a supplier or vendor with no commitment to engage in any particular project. It is very likely that in an RFI no project details would be provided. Instead the document would focus on the vendor capabilities, skills and experience. • Advantages of an RFI: This form of inquiry requires the least knowledge about the work that a vendor would ultimately do. It does not require the vendor to provide any kind of a bid or project financial information. • Disadvantages of an RFI: Because there is no implied commitment that work is imminent, vendors may be reluctant to invest large amounts of time providing data about themselves. Therefore, it is more common that an RFI would be high level and not go into as much depth as some of the other forms. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Request for Quote The RFQ form does engage the vendor to provide specifics around what they would offer in terms of completing a project. The RFQ focuses on a quote that has a certain valid period. In project work these are more uncommon, more likely to use the RFP process. RFQ is much more likely when the primary terms of the deal are financial, and other elements of performance are not significant. Request for Proposal The RFP focuses on specifying a scope of work that needs to be performed and solicits in response a proposal from the vendor describing how they would go about executing the project - including pricing information. The RFP requires you to know more about what you want to in the project. In addition to soliciting information from the vendors, you will need to be able to specify the requirements for the vendor to a sufficient detail that they can develop an approach to the project. • Advantages of the RFP: The RFP positions you as a potential client to move to a contract in the next step. If you think you are ready to begin the work, an RFP is a good step for selecting the vendor and staging the structure of a contract to execute the proposal. • Disadvantages of the RFP: Because the RFP requires enough detail to specify a project (including some level of requirements and scope definition), it takes more work to write. Creating an RFP for a project where you are uncertain of the scope may result in unpredictable proposals from the vendors that bear little to no resemblance to the actual project you need to run. SUMMARY OF SELECTION PROCESS OPTIONS 1) Noncompetitive Selection In this option, City Council sets a project budget (i.e. – the $70,000 included in the CIP) and authorizes City staff to select a competent consultant to perform the project within the allowed budget. In a variation of this option, the Council could require the staff to review its selection recommendation with the Park Board prior to presenting the recommendation to the Council for approval of the consulting contract. • Advantages of this option are that it can be implemented quickly because there are less process steps and timelines involved in the selection process. It also has the advantage of having clear lines of accountability. If the staff’s selected consultant does not perform, staff will be clearly accountable for that nonperformance. • Disadvantages to this option revolve around the trade-off between the speed of the process and the inclusiveness of the process. There is an inverse relationship between these two factors. The more inclusive the selection process, the longer the process takes to execute. The noncompetitive selection process places an emphasis on speed over inclusiveness. If speed of process is an important factor, then I would recommend this selection process option. Estimated Weeks to Select Consultant: 7 Weeks – Council consideration on September 7, 2016 2) Competitive RFI/RFQ A competitive Request For Information (RFI) consultant process involves the creation of an RFI document; review of consultant responses to the RFI; interviews of some or all of the RFI respondents; and, development of a system to evaluate the consultants’ responses, experience and skills. The RFI consultant STAFF REPORT Page 3 selection process evaluates and distinguishes consultants based on their professional attributes, and not merely on the cost of their services. If there are one or more preferred consultants recommended through the RFI process, the City would then create a Request for Quotes (RFQ) around the broad scope of the planning project and distribute it to the preferred consultants identified in the RFI process. A committee would receive, evaluate and recommend the selection of a consultant based on their response to the RFQ. Park Board would review and comment on the committee’s recommendation. City Council would make the final decision. • Advantages of this option include its potential to be inclusive and for many opinions to be considered during many process steps along the way. This perceived advantage presumes that more people involved in the consultant selection process will result in a better ultimate decision, which may or may not be true. Because this option starts with a broad scope that will be narrowed over time, it allows the City to test the consultant market for interest without putting much investment on the line early. This is also an advantage for the consultants for the same reason. • Disadvantages of this option include its speed relative to the other options under consideration. Because it has two distinct steps, it will be inherently slower. It will also be slower because it is likely to be designed to be more inclusive, possibly including a mix of Park Board members, adjoining neighbors and staff. Another disadvantage with this option is that its inclusiveness dilutes its accountability. Estimated Weeks to Select Consultant: 20 Weeks – Council consideration on December 6, 2016 3) Competitive RFP The competitive RFP process presumes the City knows what services it wants to purchase. In the case of this project: planning services to develop a plan for the future development of Fred Richards Park. Staff would prepare a description of the project; the project area; the project capital budget; and then distribute that information to bona fide planning consultants. The RFP would be designed to solicit from the consultants not only their credentials and experiences, but also the price to perform the services described in the RFP. Upon receipt of the responses to the RFP, a committee could review the written submissions and interview the proposing consultants. A recommendation would be reviewed by the Park Board and a final decision made by the City Council. • Advantages of the competitive RFP process include its process speed over the RFI/RFQ option; its inclusiveness; and its clarity of intent. • Disadvantages include process speed and dilution of accountability relative to the noncompetitive selection process. Estimated Weeks to Select Consultant: 13 Weeks – Council consideration on October 18, 2016 4) Design Competition In this variation of the RFP option, the City designs an RFP that not only asks consultants to submit their professional credentials, experiences and fees, but also their conceptual proposal for the development of the park. The RFP would include a general description of what the land uses and activities the City foresees STAFF REPORT Page 4 in the park and an estimated park development budget. Consultants would be equally constrained and inspired by the estimated park development budget. A committee would evaluate and recommend the selection of a consultant based on a combination of the credentials, experiences, professional fees and the feasibility and desirability of the proposal. Park Board would review and comment on the committee recommendation. City Council would make the final decision. • One of the advantages of employing a design competition to select the consultant is that it would also include the selection of a conceptual design for the project as well. The option is also unusual enough that it might draw an interesting mix of consulting teams into the process. The process itself could also be designed to be inclusive both internally and externally. • A significant disadvantage of this option is that because it requires consultants to spend more money internally developing a response to the RFP than the other selection processes under consideration, it may limit the number of responses we receive to the RFP. Another disadvantage of this option is that it must be designed to accommodate a slower process speed because it is requiring consultants to do perform more pre-submission design work than the selection processes under consideration. Estimated Weeks To Select Consultant: 22 Weeks – Council consideration on December 20, 2016 STAFF RECOMMENDATION I recommend the City Council authorize staff to move forward with the option #3 - competitive RFP process for the selection of the planning consultant for the Fred Richards Park Redevelopment Plan. This process will yield a sufficient amount of information to make a good consultant selection decision in a reasonable amount of time. We already know enough detail about what may be possible from a redevelopment perspective in the park that we can produce an RFP in sufficient detail to attract innovative design professionals to our process. Finally, this option provides the City the best overall balance among the forces of inclusiveness, speed of process and accountability. If the Council approves this recommendation, Director Kattreh and I will facilitate the preparation of the RFP; identify bona fide consultants to receive the RFP; identify a committee to evaluate the RFPs and interview the consultants; and prepare the evaluative tools to be used by the committee. If the Council approves this recommendation at the July 19, 2016 Council meeting, staff will advance a recommendation to Council regarding consultant selection for this planning project at the Council’s October 18, 2016 meeting. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Joe Abood, Braemar Golf Course General Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Mid America Golf & Landscape - Braemar Golf Course Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Award bid to Mid-America Golf and Landscape for the Braemar Golf Course renovation project. INTRODUCTION: See attached request for purchase form. ATTACHMENTS: Description Richard Mandell recommendation letter Mid-America Bid Request for Purchase - Mid America Golf July 8, 2016 Mr. Joseph Abood General Manager Braemar Golf Course 6364 John Harris Drive Edina, MN 55439 Dear Joe: I have reviewed the six bids for construction of the new Braemar Golf Course and recom- mend that the City of Edina engage Mid America Golf for the construction as the low bidder. I am fully aware of Mid America and although I have not worked with them before, I have zero concerns with their ability to construct the golf course for the amount they have bid. I have also discussed their bids in depth with their project Site Superintendent as well as their intended Project Manager for the project, who prepared the bid. I understand their approach and agree with it as well. I did see a few math discrepancies that would deduct $7,950.92 from their base bid: • An additional $600.00 for their shaping. • A reduction of $8,551.12 for their installation of 12” pipe. • An additional $0.20 for their overall seeding costs. Taking these adjustments into account, Mid America’s base bid should be $5,109,128.13. I also suggest acceptance of the following alternates: • Alternate #2: Add 5,280 LF of walking trails for $146,572.80 • Alternate #3: Add six bocce ball courts for $68,622.00 RMGA, Inc. recommends the City of Edina accept Mid America’s base bid and the above alternates for a total contract price of $5,324,322.93. Thank you for your time. Regards, Richard Mandell, Associate ASGCA, RLA, ISACA President Richard Mandell Golf Architecture mailing address P.O. Box 1119 Pinehurst, N.C. 28370 delivery address 2208 Midland Road Pinehurst, N.C. 28374 tel (910) 255-3111 fax (910) 255-3112 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Mayor and Council Joe Abood, GM Braemar Golf Course X July 19, 2016 Request for Purchase – Mid America Golf and Landscape, Braemar Golf Course 6/23/2016 7/31/2016 Mid-America Golf and Landscape $5,324,322.93 Recommended Quote or Bid: Mid-America Golf and Landscape General Information: Staff is requesting approval of base bid as presented as well as Alternate #2 (Add 5,280 LF of walking trails for $146,572.80) and Alternate #3 (Add six bocce ball courts for $68,622.00) for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Renovation Project to Mid –America Golf and Landscape in the amount of $5,324,322.93. Company / Bid: Base With Alternates Mid-America Golf & Landscape $5,109,128.13 $5,324,322.93 Wadsworth $6,591,047.00 $6,755,857.00 Heritage Links $6,607,858.94 $6,886,624.14 Frontier Golf $6,885,751.10 $6,955,751.10 Landscapes Unlimited, LLC $7,095,455.62 $7,335,455.62 Duininck $7,177,430.86 $7,337,430.86 Background Information: Bids for the Braemar Master Plan Project were opened on June 23, 2016. Six golf course contractors submitted qualified bids. Mid-America Golf and Landscape out of Missouri was the lowest qualified bidder. Mid-America’s base bid of just over $5.1million will allow us to accept additional alternates. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Spending Plan: ($5,109,128.13) Mid-America Golf & Landscape ($215,194.80) Potential alternates ($230,000) Project Manager / Shaper / Equipment & Fuel ($395,000) Architect ($100,000) Engineering ($100,000) Golf Course accessories ($425,000) Grow in ($55,000) Permits (Request will be submitted to City Council to waive permit fees) ($20,000) Utility upgrades ($425,000) Contingency 8% $7,074,322.93 Total project estimate including low bid ($7,500,000 total project estimate per May 2016 pro forma) Funding Source & CIP Project Budget: The debt is to be repaid utilizing golf course revenue. This project had a previously approved 2016 CIP budget of $3,500,000. This project budget was set prior to the selection of a final master plan renovation design plan. Staff Alternate Recommendations: Alternate #1- Pave base bid asphalt paths as concrete for $313,497.26 Recommendation – Decline Justification - Although staff recognizes the brand elevation from concrete cart paths, the return on investment doesn’t justify the $313,487.26 expense. Alternate #2 – Add 5,280 LF of Walking Trails for $146,572.80 Recommendation - Accept Justification – The addition of walking trails adds to the overall community amenity provided at Braemar Park. Alternate #3 - Add 6 Bocce Ball Courts for $68,622.00 Recommendation - Accept Justification – The addition of Bocce Ball Courts add to the overall community amenity provided at Braemar Park. Alternate #4 - Removal of existing irrigation equipment for $34,000.00 Recommendation - Decline Justification – There is no need to pay for removal. Abandoning the existing system will not interfere with new system. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 3 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Alternate #5 – Paige Electric UF Single Conductor wire for irrigation at no extra charge. Recommendation - Decline Justification – Lesser quality product with no cost savings. Alternate #6 – Specified well(s) pump station(s) PLC and control upgrade- Qty (3) for $28,075.00 Recommendation - Decline Justification – Limited return on investment. No substantial savings in labor. Alternate #7 – Eliminate topsoil removal/replacement in wetland mitigation area for $2,450.00 Recommendation - Decline Justification – The credit of $2,450.00 is not worth the elimination of this line item. Process Timeline: At the March 18, 2014 City Council meeting the council approved a motion to immediately start the master plan for Braemar Golf Course with funding from the Braemar Memorial Fund. At the April 22, 2014 City Council meeting the council passed a motion to form a Braemar Master Plan Task Force to begin the Braemar master planning process. At the June 17, 2014 City Council meeting the council approved the selection of the Braemar Master Plan Task Force appointments. Rick Ites, Pacy Erck, Joseph Hulbert, Dick Brozic and Paul Presthus were selected by an application and interview process as well as Brenda McCormick and David Deeds who were appointed by the Park Board. The task force has been meeting on a weekly basis since July 2014. Rick Ites was selected as the chairperson to lead the Master Plan Task Force through the process. On July 28, 2014 the Request for Proposal for a golf course architect for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan was advertised. On August 22, 2014 twenty-eight (28) consultants from all over the country submitted proposals in response to the Braemar Master Plan RFP. Of the 28, five were selected by staff to be interviewed and evaluated by the task force. In August 2015 an NGF - GolfSAT Survey was conducted. There were 739 Braemar Golf Course patron responses. This survey helped structure the Master Plan Task Force objectives and mission statement. Master Plan Task Force. Architectural design interviews were conducted Sept. 8 - 10, 2014. At the Sept. 16, 2014 City Council meeting Richard Mandell Golf Architecture Consulting Services was selected to complete the Master Plan at Braemar Golf Course. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 4 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 In October 2014 Mandell conducted multiple site walks with community residents (over 75 residents participated), environmental agencies and the Master Plan Task Force as well as held an open house to gather feedback for the Master Plan. In January 2015 Mandell once again met with community residents (over 100 residents participated), environmental agencies and the Master Plan Task Force to discuss preliminary concepts for the future of the Braemar Golf facility. Jan. 13, 2015 - Mandell presented the Park Board preliminary concepts for consideration. Feb. 17, 2015 - Mandell presented City Council preliminary concepts for consideration. April 14, 2015 - Mandell submitted the final Renovation Business Plan for Task Force and staff review. May 6, 2015 - Master Plan work session with City Council, Park Board, staff and Master Plan Task Force. May 12, 2015 - Staff made a recommendation of Option #5 of the RMGA Renovation Business Plan to the Park Board. The Park Board voted unanimously in favor of the staff recommendation. June 2, 2015 – Staff made a recommendation of Option #5 of the RMGA Renovation Business Plan to the City Council. The City Council directed staff to enter into contract negotiations with RMGA to provide design and construction documents and to oversee bid and construction administration for a renovated eighteen hole golf course on the current Braemar Golf Course property. They also directed staff to enter into contract negotiations with Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) to complete the wetland and water resource services for the proposed golf course modifications. These include wetland delineations, wetland permitting, wetland mitigation design and watershed districts requirements. June 17, 2015 – City Council approved Richard Mandell’s proposal to provide design and construction documents and to oversee bid and construction administration for a renovated eighteen hole golf course on the current Braemar Golf Course property. August 13, 2015 – Mandell met with staff and received preliminary Master Plan direction. September 25, 2015 - Mandell met with staff and City Council to review Preliminary Master Plan. November 5, 2015 – Mandell presented Preliminary Master Plan to public. March 8, 2016 - Mandell met with staff to review Design Development Plans. April 7, 2016 – Mandell and SEH submitted initial Wetland Replacement Plans for review. April 13, 2016 - Mandell and SEH submitted plans to Army Corps of Engineers for processing. April 13, 2016 - Nine-Mile Watershed Creek Accepted Wetland Replacement Plans. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 5 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 May 17, 2016 – Staff received approval from City Council to start the public bidding process for the project. July 19, 2016 – Staff is requesting award of bid to Mid-America Golf and landscape. Future Schedule: October 2016 – Planned start date for the Braemar Master Plan project. June 2018 – Planned completion date for the Braemar Master Plan project. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Waiver of City Building Fees and Development Permit Fees Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the request to waive the Building and Development permit fees for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Renovation, Creek Valley Sun Shelter and Arneson Acres Greenhouse replacement projects. INTRODUCTION: The City has the authority to waive Building and Development fee permits for municipal projects. By doing so, the City is able to set aside the amount that would have been spent on the fees to instead add value to the overall project, cover potential future change orders, or make the project more affordable by reducing the total project cost. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Waiver of Building Permit Fees July 19, 2016 Mayor and City Council Scott Neal, City Manager Waiver of City Building and Development Fees Information / Background: The City has the authority to waive Building and Development fee permits for municipal projects. By doing so, the City is able to set aside the amount that would have been spent on the fees to instead add value to the overall project, cover potential future change orders, or make the project more affordable by reducing the total project cost. Braemar Golf Course Master Plan The project is scheduled to begin in October 2016. Mid-America Golf and Landscape will be completing the renovation. Richard Mandell will be overseeing the project on the City's behalf. The total estimated Building and Development permit fees for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Renovation Project are $55,252.98. Building Permit Fee - $32,507.69 Contractor Registration Fee - $5.00 Plan review - $21,130.00 Surcharge – Based on Valuation - $1,610.29 Creek Valley Sun Shelter The total estimated Building and Development permit fees for the Creek Valley Sun Shelter are $595.75. Arneson Acres Greenhouse The total estimated Building and Development permit fees for the Arenson Acres Greenhouse replacement are $909.04. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Fee Waiver Request Total Braemar Golf Course Master Plan $55,252.98 Creek Valley Sun Shelter $595.75 Arneson Acres Greenhouse $909.04 TOTAL $56,757.77 It is important for the City Council to determine if these project’s Building and Development permit fees will be waived so that staff is able to prepare project budgets with the most accurate information available. Waiving the Building and Development permit fees will not have a detrimental impact on the permit revenue budget. Action Requested Approve the request to waive Building and Development fees for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan Renovation Project the Creek Valley Sun Shelter and the Arneson Acres Greenhouse replacement projects. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2016-63: Accepting Various Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt resolution. INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2016-63 Accepting Various Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2016-63 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Parks & Recreation – Art Center Concord Elementary School Glue sticks and colored pencils Ron Merchant Easels (13 standing 4 table top) ten books John Patrick Grimes Crayon Maker Pat Olson Magazines, canvases, drawing and sand paper Gary Diamond Pottery bats, trimming box, Griffin Grip, Art Supplies/Pottery Edina Parks & Recreation Douglas Eugene King $100.00 Creek Valley School Park Dianne & John Dovolis $100.00 Creek Valley School Park Dated July 19, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 19, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council Meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondence Received Through 6-30-2016 Correspondence Received Through 07-08-2016 Correspondence Received Through Noon 07-14-2016 Correspondence Received Through 2:00 P.M. 07-19-2016 From:Lori Richman To:Edina Mail Subject:Regarding Braemar Winter Recreation Area - To: City Council, Mayor Hovland, and Ann Kattreh Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:05:20 PM Good afternoon Mayor Hovland, City Council members and Ann Kattreh, I write to you today as a resident of Edina, in support of the proposed Braemar Winter Recreation Area, and very much in support of including “fat-biking” during the winter as well as mountain- biking in the off-season in this development. I am a proponent of improving Edina’s facilities as a Bicycle Friendly Community, and particularly in improving the overall health, wellness, and community of Edina residents. I believe not only in the need for increased road and off-road transportation routes for cyclists, but also in the need for non- traditional and off-road options for bike riders of all ages and abilities. Perhaps you are aware that the Edina Mountain Bike Team boasts one of the larger team participation numbers (60+) in the Minnesota High School Cycling (NICA) league. Of course, as the youth ride, many of the parents do as well. With no off-road, mountain-bike or winter fat-bike facilities in Edina, our youth and their parents must go to other communities to practice and to ride. The Braemar Park area would be an ideal local facility for this group, and for many others in Edina who mountain bike, and ride winter-fat. You may wonder if winter fat-biking is compatible with the proposed Nordic trails. I’d like to assure you that in fact, it is! A number of large Nordic ski areas allow fat-biking, and these two activities coexist without difficulties. Notably, Giant’s Ridge allows fat-biking on their Nordic trails. And so I ask you to support the development of the Braemar Winter Recreation Area to include both mountain- and fat-biking. Thank you so much for your consideration. Sincerely, Lori Richman 5828 Ewing Avenue South Edina (952) 237-6778 From:Daniel Berntson To:Edina Mail Subject:Nordic ski trails at Braimer Park Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:12:10 PM Edina City Council members, Please vote in favor of a study of Edina ski trail development at Braemer Park. My family would enjoy using cross country ski trails in our city. I also encourage our city council to support the Edina High School nordic ski team by developing the trail and snow making capability to train our skiers. Dan Berntson 6728 Point Dr Edina Sent from my iPhone From:leftygirl3@gmail.com To:Edina Mail Subject:Ski Trails & Snowmaking at Braemar: Say YES Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 3:45:26 PM Hello City Council Members: My name is Amanda Mosborg and I will be a senior at Edina High School next fall. I have been an endurance athlete for Edina for almost 6 years and I cannot tell you how much I have enjoyed being a part of the rapidly growing Nordic Ski team. For years we have had beautifully groomed trails right outside the high school, practically right in our backyard. I understand that this is changing due to construction, something that is REALLY going to affect the team and its growth unless we have another venue to ski that is closer to the high school that Hylands Park in Bloomington. I urge you to vote for the construction of trails at Braemar! It would be a lovely and certainly very needed addition to our city. Thank you for all that you do. Amanda Mosborg Sent from my iPhone From:Sara Klos To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Nordic Ski Trails Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 4:10:34 PM Hello council members, As a previous member of the Edina Nordic ski team for six years and captain of the team my senior year, Nordic was an incredibly important part of my time at Edina. Not only as an athlete, but as a student as well. Nordic allowed me to meet new friends, release pent up energy from stressful classes, and get outside and enjoy the sometimes brutal Minnesota winters (that I have come to appreciate after spending a year in Boston...) I'm very excited for the expansion of the Highschool and the plans for the future, but it worries me that many of our old ski trails have been demolished. In order to keep the Nordic ski team alive, which has grown exponentially in the past few years, I strongly support the creation of multi-use trails in the Braemar golf area. It is the perfect space for the Nordic ski team to practice, especially when it isn't being used for alternate purposes in the winter months. Nordic is a sport where people from all athletic abilities can feel welcome, and I can personally say that it was a HUGE part of my wonderful experience at Edina Highschool. Thank you, Sara Klos Class of 2015 From:Liz Abt Ellenberger To:Edina Mail Subject:ski trails at Braemar Date:Tuesday, June 21, 2016 4:18:43 PM Building ski trails at Braemar is absolutely critical for the Edina Nordic Ski Team because we are losing most of our current 5 km of practice space at the high school. Edina Nordic is the 3rd largest sport at Edina High School, with nearly 200 athletes - they deserve somewhere to practice, just as all the other sports have. This would also be a fantastic asset for the health and welfare of all Edina citizens. As a late-onset skier myself, I think it would be wonderful to be able to get out and ski before/after/during the workday. As our population ages, it is important to include many ways to keep people active. Skiing is one sport that continues to maintain its popularity. Please vote YES for snowmaking and trails at Braemar. Thank you, liz abt ellenberger 6920 dakota trail From:Kathy Dahlheimer To:Edina Mail Subject:For the Attention of Council Winter plans for Braemar. Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2016 11:20:36 AM Hello...Thank you for all the work you do and for the careful discussion you had last night regarding the plans for Braemar winter area. As a resident who probably will never use this area as well as the golf course I do understand that the concept is no doubt a good one and many families will enjoy. I watched the presentation and was really struck by the statement that they have planned for a 25 incline which they clearly state will be slow and non competitive with neighbors. What? Why would we invest in something that is not competitive? Apparently the incline should be 50 to be exciting for most tubers. As an outside observer this makes no sense. If you proceed (I hope you do not) then at least make it a place that will be in demand. I believe Park Board is really not on board as evidenced from their discussions and I think Kevin Staunton’s comments regarding getting a much better picture of how many neighborhood projects will be delayed or just not done due to funds going for this project. While neighborhood warming houses and fields may not be “revenue generators” they are an important component for family life in the city for people of all ages. The price tag of about 3mil is a very educated guess, but how about the maintenance, operational costs, increase in insurance etc etc.? As the mayor said this needs to be vetted in front of citizens and not just the Nordic community. I am sorry the schools are losing their trails but this is much too expensive to not be considered by the community at large. Holding a meeting in July or August or frankly even immediately after summer vacation will not attract many citizens. Also these meetings are not well publicized....many of us seldom see an Edina Sun Current because they don’t consistently deliver to all homes. The bulletin boards throughout the city are not really visible and seen by few citizens. I would suggest posting on Next Door for all neighborhoods as that seems to get some people out on matters that they are interested in. Given this will be yet another contributor to tax increases I am not so sure this is a good idea. I assume some research has been done to see how things have gone over at Hyland? The past couple of years even snow making was a challenge. I noted in the presentation they expect to make snow just a few times a year...so does that model imply that in between the snow does not melt? I mean we really need to look at this from the new reality of climate change and our milder winters. As I watched the meeting there was only one council member fully on board with this and the rest although they voted to spend more of our money (except Bob Stewart) were clearly not fully on board. Please carefully look at this in terms of how many residents will use it regularly...not just once or twice per season but season pass type. Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Kathleen Dahlheimer From:Frazell, Kevin To:Mayor"s Association Cc:Kramer, Jenna Subject:[mayorassoc] Upcoming Training Just for Mayors and Board Chairs Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2016 11:58:40 AM Attachments:image001.pngimage004.png Good Afternoon, Mayors – It was great to see many of you at the LMC annual conference last week, including the MMA Friday breakfast. As part of the Big 4, LMC is partnering with the Association of Minnesota Counties, the Minnesota School Boards Association, and the Minnesota Association of Townships to present a new training on running effective meetings and leading with civility. The point of this joint effort is for mayors, along with chairs from our county boards, school boards, and townships to come together for an evening to share perspectives and learn from one another, as well as association staff members, about what it takes to manage meetings well. During this training, you’ll have the opportunity to explore these topics: • Your role in running effective meetings and managing conflict • Why conflict happens • Different conflict management styles • Strategies you can use to make conflict productive • Where you can get help and resources These workshops will be held in three locations during the month of July: July 13—Bemidji (Online registration closes June 30) July 14—Staples (Online registration closes June 30) July 28—North Mankato (Online registration closes July 14) Registration is limited to 15 city participants per location—register soon to reserve your spot using the link below!: www.lmc.org/Big4Civility16Mayors Kevin Kevin Frazell, ICMA-CM Director of Member Services Tel: (651) 281-1215 | Fax: (651) 215-4104 Cell: (651) 303-6034 kfrazell@lmc.org | www.lmc.org League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Ave. West St. Paul, MN 55103 Connecting & Innovating since 1913 Stay connected with the League of Minnesota Cities: Web Facebook Twitter Blog ---You are currently subscribed to mayorassoc as: jhovland@edinamn.govTo unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-276393-134747.d6efcee84896c0ee8a72ea285a68e539@listserv.lmc.org DEREK STEHLIN Business Development at Zagster | Connect ___________________________________ P (617) 702-2241 | E derek@zagster.com C calendly.com/derek_zagster ___________________________________ 25 First Street Suite 104 Cambridge, MA 02141 www.zagster.com Read our case study featuring Carmel Indiana: The Successful Small City Bike Share DEREK STEHLIN Business Development at Zagster | Connect From:Derek Stehlin To:Edina Mail Subject:Re: bike share for Edina? Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2016 2:48:22 PM Hi again James, A few of my colleagues are attending the Conference of Mayors this Friday - I just noticed you're on the attendee list as well! Not sure if you'll actually be in attendance or not, but I'd still be interested to hear your perspective on bike sharing for Edina before then. Thanks, Derek On 2016-06-20 19:49:10 UTC, Derek Stehlin <derek@zagster.com> wrote:James, Bumping this to the top of your inbox. Cities like Alpharetta and Flint are using bike share in non-traditional ways too, such as for downtown revitalization efforts and highlighting existing trails. Do you think it makes sense to talk about how bike sharing could benefit your community? Best, Derek P.S. You'll find a link to my calendly below - feel free to throw some time to connect on my schedule there if easier. ___________________________________ P (617) 702-2241 | E derek@zagster.com C calendly.com/derek_zagster ___________________________________ 25 First Street Suite 104 Cambridge, MA 02141 www.zagster.com Read our case study featuring Carmel Indiana: The Successful Small City Bike Share DEREK STEHLIN Business Development at Zagster | Connect ___________________________________ P (617) 702-2241 | E derek@zagster.com C calendly.com/derek_zagster ___________________________________ 25 First Street Suite 104 Cambridge, MA 02141 www.zagster.com Read our case study featuring Carmel Indiana: The Successful Small City Bike Share On 2016-06-16 19:49:10 UTC, Derek Stehlin <derek@zagster.com> wrote:Hi James, We haven't had the opportunity to speak before, but I wanted to reach out to see if Edina has ever considered bike sharing? Our programs have been successful in a variety of cities, like Carmel, IN and Smyrna, GA. Do you have a few minutes to connect early next week to chat about the potential of bike sharing for your community? All the best, Derek From:clover graham To:James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonann1@gmail.com Subject:Fwd: Duluth school board votes unanimously to remove recycled tire playground mulch from all district playgrounds Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2016 3:31:35 PM Hello, The below email was sent to the administration and school board.Almost daily, I read of a school district or city council taking action against the use of toxic tires where children play.The tide is turning on this material for playgrounds and fields. I was hoping to see Edina be a leader on this issue, as Duluth is now doing. Minnetonka has also committed to removing it from all playgrounds this summer. Thank you for your attention to this very important public health matter,Clover Hackett Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Clover Hackett <clovergraham@hotmail.com> Date: June 22, 2016 at 3:21:49 PM CDTTo: Ric Dressen <Ric.Dressen@edinaschools.org>, Susan.Brott@edinaschools.org, sarah.patzloff@edinaschools.org, regina.neville@edinaschools.org, randy.meyer@edinaschools.org, lisa.obrien@edinaschools.org, eric.hamilton@edinaschools.org, david.goldstein@edinaschools.org, amir.gharbi@edinaschools.org, leny.wallen- friedman@edinaschools.orgSubject: Duluth school board votes unanimously to remove recycled tire playground mulch from all district playgrounds Hello,I wanted to bring you the good news that last night the Duluth school board voted unanimously to remove recycled tire mulch from all district playgrounds. "Board members have said that they want to be proactive in protecting young children". One member Rosie Loeffler-Kemp was quoted as saying, "I look forward to our school district taking the lead on providing safer alternatives for our playgrounds and I believe that using the precautionary principle as a basis for environmental and public health policy is a wise way to make decisions." I, along with the hundreds of people in Edina that signed my two petitions asking you to pause or use a nontoxic infill, could not agree more. How unfortunate that Edina will not be seen as a leader on this issue. The playground material is made of the exact same material as the crumb rubber, ground up toxic tires. The health risks are equally concerning to parents. I applaud the Duluth school board for taking a proactive approach and listening to the concerns of their parent population. These playgrounds were not due for replacement, but rather the school board is instructing the school district, in the midst of serious budget cuts, to find the funds in order to take this proactive approach. The tide is turning on toxic tires. I remain extremely concerned with the amount of this material that EPS facilities, administration and school board have committed this community to. Where will EPS find the funds to replace our toxic tire material when the time comes? Thank you for your time, Clover http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/education/4059605-duluth-school-board-votes-replace-rubber-playground-mulch Sent from my iPhone From:James Hovland To:Edina Mail Subject:RE: bike share for Edina? Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:13:41 PM Attachments:image002.png Derek, I will be pleased to visit with you or one of your colleagues at the Conference but that is all I can commit to at the present time. Our Council has not undertaken any study of this issue and has not authorized a study by our Transportation Commission as part of their 2016 Work Plan. Let me know if you want me to spend a few minutes with anyone from your organization. Thanks, Jim Hovland James B. Hovland, Esquire HOVLAND & RASMUS, PLLC Southdale Office Centre 6800 France Avenue S., Suite 190 Edina, MN 55435 jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com Phone: (612) 874-8550 Direct: (612) 874-8551 Fax: (612) 874-9362 Cell: (612) 961-6192 From: Lynette Biunno [mailto:lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov] On Behalf Of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 2:50 PM Subject: FW: bike share for Edina? Lynette Biunno, Receptionist952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Derek Stehlin [mailto:derek@zagster.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 2:48 PMTo: Edina MailSubject: Re: bike share for Edina? Hi again James, A few of my colleagues are attending the Conference of Mayors this Friday - I just noticed you're on the attendee list as well! Not sure if you'll actually be in attendance or not, but I'd still be interested to hear your perspective on bike sharing for Edina before then. DEREK STEHLIN Business Development at Zagster | Connect ___________________________________ P (617) 702-2241 | E derek@zagster.com C calendly.com/derek_zagster ___________________________________ 25 First Street Suite 104 Cambridge, MA 02141 www.zagster.com Read our case study featuring Carmel Indiana: The Successful Small City Bike Share DEREK STEHLIN Business Development at Zagster | Connect ___________________________________ P (617) 702-2241 | E derek@zagster.com C calendly.com/derek_zagster ___________________________________ 25 First Street Suite 104 Cambridge, MA 02141 www.zagster.com Read our case study featuring Carmel Indiana: Thanks, Derek On 2016-06-20 19:49:10 UTC, Derek Stehlin <derek@zagster.com> wrote: James, Bumping this to the top of your inbox. Cities like Alpharetta and Flint are using bike share in non-traditional ways too, such as for downtown revitalization efforts and highlighting existing trails. Do you think it makes sense to talk about how bike sharing could benefit your community? Best, Derek P.S. You'll find a link to my calendly below - feel free to throw some time to connect on my schedule there if easier. The Successful Small City Bike Share DEREK STEHLIN Business Development at Zagster | Connect ___________________________________ P (617) 702-2241 | E derek@zagster.com C calendly.com/derek_zagster ___________________________________ 25 First Street Suite 104 Cambridge, MA 02141 www.zagster.com Read our case study featuring Carmel Indiana: The Successful Small City Bike Share On 2016-06-16 19:49:10 UTC, Derek Stehlin <derek@zagster.com> wrote: Hi James, We haven't had the opportunity to speak before, but I wanted to reach out to see if Edina has ever considered bike sharing? Our programs have been successful in a variety of cities, like Carmel, IN and Smyrna, GA. Do you have a few minutes to connect early next week to chat about the potential of bike sharing for your community? All the best, Derek From:Johnson, Elyse To:Edina Mail; Scott H. Neal Cc:Long, Jamie Subject:RE: Congressman Ellison Meeting Date:Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:30:17 PM Good afternoon: I wanted to follow up on this note. Would a morning meeting work the first week of August? Perhaps 8 AM on August 16, 17, or 18 will work for everyone. Just let me know! Thank you, Elyse From: Long, Jamie Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:37 PMTo: 'mail@EdinaMN.gov'; 'sneal@EdinaMN.gov'Cc: Johnson, ElyseSubject: Congressman Ellison Meeting June 15, 2016 Dear Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council: I am writing to request a meeting with you in the coming months to discuss the issues of greatest interest to Edina, and to provide a brief update on activities in Congress. Because I am in Washington D.C. the bulk of the year, I always look forward to opportunities to connect with the units of government closest to the community. Please be in touch with Elyse Johnson, my scheduler, to coordinate a meeting (elyse.johnson@mail.house.gov). I have limited availability during the evenings when I am back in Minnesota, so if possible, I would appreciate flexibility in trying to schedule a meeting in the morning or over lunch. Best Regards, Congressman Keith Ellison From:Scott H. Neal To:"Johnson, Elyse"; Edina Mail Cc:Long, Jamie; MJ Lamon Subject:RE: Congressman Ellison Meeting Date:Thursday, June 23, 2016 8:57:34 AM Attachments:image001.pngimage007.png Hi Elyse – Due to the number and complexity of personal schedules involved on our end, I have asked a member of my staff, MJ Lamon, to coordinate the scheduling on our end. She will follow up with you regarding dates, times and locations. We are excited about the prospect of meeting Congressman Ellison here. Thanks again, Scott Scott Neal, City Manager952-826-0401 | Fax 952-826-0390sneal@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov The City of Edina was named one of the Star Tribune’s Top Workplaces in 2015! From: Johnson, Elyse [mailto:Elyse.Johnson@mail.house.gov] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:30 PMTo: Edina Mail; Scott H. NealCc: Long, JamieSubject: RE: Congressman Ellison Meeting Good afternoon: I wanted to follow up on this note. Would a morning meeting work the first week of August? Perhaps 8 AM on August 16, 17, or 18 will work for everyone. Just let me know! Thank you, Elyse From: Long, Jamie Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 7:37 PMTo: 'mail@EdinaMN.gov'; 'sneal@EdinaMN.gov'Cc: Johnson, ElyseSubject: Congressman Ellison Meeting June 15, 2016 Dear Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council: I am writing to request a meeting with you in the coming months to discuss the issues of greatest interest to Edina, and to provide a brief update on activities in Congress. Because I am in Washington D.C. the bulk of the year, I always look forward to opportunities to connect with the units of government closest to the community. Please be in touch with Elyse Johnson, my scheduler, to coordinate a meeting (elyse.johnson@mail.house.gov). I have limited availability during the evenings when I am back in Minnesota, so if possible, I would appreciate flexibility in trying to schedule a meeting in the morning or over lunch. Best Regards, Congressman Keith Ellison From:Floyd Grabiel To:Kevin Staunton; James Hovland Subject:77th street Date:Thursday, June 23, 2016 1:16:31 PM Just saw an article in the “Sun Times” that Richfield is asking Edina to rename the 77th 76th street corridor to International Blvd., as Richfield is doing. For what it’s worth, I think it is a great idea. Hope all’s well with you both. Best regards, Floyd Grabiel651.503.8809 feglaw@gmail.com From:Sara Jones To:Edina Mail Subject:Thank You Date:Thursday, June 23, 2016 8:57:01 PM Dear Council Members and Mayor Hovland, Thank you for your consideration and support of the continued planning for Nordic ski trails at Braemar. I know it's not a simple proposal, but I'm confident that, working together, we can figure out a way to make the trails a successful reality. Please let me know if I can be of help. Best regards, Sara Jones 612-940-2485 From:Jonathon Chaffee To:Edina Mail Subject:X-Country ski trails Date:Friday, June 24, 2016 8:37:06 AM Hello: I realized that the X-Country ski trails by the Edina High School may be gone with the addition on to the school. A lot of people use these trails for skiing and running. Can these trails be groomed on Braemar as another option? My family and community will miss having these trails close to home. Soon we will have no more green spaces which is unfortunate. I am excited to hear of any options for running and X-country skiing. Thank you, Jonathon Chaffee and family From:Schaefer, Ph.d. Mark To:Edina Mail Subject:XC Ski Trails Date:Friday, June 24, 2016 9:43:30 AM Dear City Council: I support XC Ski Trails in Edina. I have frequently used the high school trails and would appreciate continuing to use them, or having the Braemar option. Thank you,Mark Mark T. Schaefer,Ph.D. mtschaefer@comcast.net From:Brandt, Andrea (RIS-MIN) To:Edina Mail Subject:Ski trails at Braemar Date:Saturday, June 25, 2016 10:31:23 AM Hi, I wrote in already as a parent of child on the EHS nordic ski team. But I am writing again as an adult and Edina resident that loves to ski. I am 49 and started skiing as a child. In the past 5 years, I have purchased new skis/boots and resumed skiing. Sometimes I go to Wirth or Hylands but I usually ski where the nordic ski team practices since we live just down the street. I am sad that will no longer be an option but would happy to go to Braemar if there were groomed trails. I attended an event at Braemar this past winter where Hoigaards brought in snowshoes and we went around the golf course under a full moon and then ate fish fry at Tin Fish. It was nice to see the clubhouse in use as well as the lovely grounds. We should take advantage of this gorgeous property year round. Please consider finding a project to make snow and groom trails at Braemar for the Nordic Ski team and also residents. Thank you, Andrea ---------------------------------------- The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e- mail, and delete the original message. From:Bruce Freeman To:James Hovland Subject:Mtn biking at braemar and Nordic plan Date:Saturday, June 25, 2016 3:58:32 PM Attachments:MtnBikingInfoforParkBoard12-5.PDF Mayor Hovland I was one of the two people who waited until the end of the council meeting on the 3 million dollar plan for x-c skiing and tubing and its related $330,000 consultation fee. Thank you very much for not fast tracking the project and asking for citizen input. I had just found out about the meeting the day before and I attended because I am extremely concerned about the plans' use of the terrain on the east side hills of Braemar because I believe that terrain should be preserved for mtn biking, not that the space can't be shared, but their plan makes that impossible as outlined. I was hoping we could met and talk about the Nordic plan and mtn biking. I have advocated for mtn biking at Braemar for quite a few years now which included a presentation to the park board, testifying at the citizens input meeting about the park system, a front page newspaper article in the Sun and numerous consultations with Ann Katreh. As it stands now, we have been repeatedly told by Ms. Katreh that no plans for any sport using Braemar can move ahead until the master plan is completed which doesn't even start until 2017. So I was extremely concerned and upset when I found out that one sport was possibly getting a fast track and even worse would use critical space that is needed for creating one of the finest mtn biking trails systems in the metro area. Also you should know that I spent the last 15 years as part of the management team running one of the most successful snow tubing operations in the twin cites at Buck Hill ski area so I am very knowledgeable about tubing costs and operations, snow making and all the related equipment. My schedule is very flexible. I live in Edina and could meet you at a time convenient to you but hopefully as soon as possible as we are now organizing to have a massive presence with the Edina Mtn Biking team and all our other supporters at the citizens input meeting on the Nordic plan. We will also be making another presentation to the Park Board at their July meeting. I look forward to meeting with you and explaining what an incredible opportunity we have at Braemar because of the unique hilly terrain to make one of the finest mtn biking trail systems in the metro at a tiny fraction of the cost of the Nordic plan. Thank you for your time.Bruce Freeman612-812-2180 PS I am sending you some information I gave to Ann Katreh a few years ago and a map I created that shows the general outline of the trail system. For some reason the layout of the file got messed up but you can still read it. Thanks again for reading this before we meet Fast Ridges Parkirkg Eoci 4. ut14141000, , Future :Sw lExisting Floating Walk Way ©.2.O12 Go-ogie 44:-_51'.11:3.50".N 93-23'110.931' ellov 83611 rinp wood,boardwalk The Ridges at Braemar Mountain Biking Information for Edina Parks and Rec. Dept. Mountain Biking is....... Riding bikes on narrow single track dirt trails that wind up and down and all around every type of terrain. A fun and exciting lifelong sport for families to ride together, have fun, and get fit. A fast growing sport that has communities and park system building trail systems all across the metro and the state. Wildly growing in popularity because its an outdoor active sport that is exciting, fast moving, a fantastic all body workout, and free once you have a bike. Becoming a high school sport with teams competing across the metro area. Edina High School is planning on forming a team this spring and would love a local trail for practicing and training. Mountain Biking is not.... Done on expensive paved trails, instead riders use narrow, one way single track dirt trails that are constructed at a fraction of the cost and require minimal upkeep. Dangerous, as each rider chooses the speed and the challenge of every trail by the way they ride the trail A sport that attracts the wrong kind of crowd. Most participants are middle aged males with money looking to get fit and have an exciting workout. Why is Braemar such a great place for mountain biking? The Ridges at Braemar will be built on fantastic, hard to come by hilly terrain featuring multiple ridgelines that is similar to the best terrain at Lebanon Hills in Eagan, and Murphy Hanrehan Park in Savage, two of the best trail systems in the metro area.. The trail system would access under utilized and seldom seen park property. The Ridges at Braemar can offer trails designed for all skill levels, have great exciting long downhill runs and super scenic ridgeline runs that could make it one of the best riding spots in the metro. A trail system easily fits into the park boundaries and works well with existing park users. What is the big vision for the area? The Ridges at Braemar if totally built in all possible areas could encircle Braemar Park with 3 trail sections, two connecting trails, and a skills park. Note: This image represents the basic concept of the areas available for trails. It is not the final design. Nor do the narrow barely visible trails take up that much space. The Park has wooded areas on all sides around the golf course that could be used for trails The East Side Ridge runs along the golf course from Dewey Hill on the north, Gleason on the east and West 78th St on the south. Trail designers envision a stacked trail system with 4 skill levels with green beginner, blue intermediate, black advanced, and red expert. The trailhead could be the small parking lot on east side of golf course entrance. There would be a skills park on the flats just east of the parking lot that is very viewable from passing traffic. The West Side Ridges run on both sides of Braemar Blvd from the baseball fields on the north to the frontage road on the south, the golf course on the east and the ice arena and training center and utility city shed on the west. An advantage of the west ridge area is its lack of residential neighbors. Ideally the east and west ridge sections would be connected with a two way route on the south side that uses an existing gravel roadway and plastic floating boardwalk for most of the distance and a new winding wood boardwalk through wooded marsh area for the remainder of the distance. The smallest potential area for trails is on the North Side of the park and would wind around the northernmost part of the executive par 3 golf course. It could also connect the east and west side ridges. The project could be built in phases over a few years or it could just as easily be built in its entirety in a few months time once it was approved. Who is supporting this effort? Edina Citizens. See their support with e-mails and meeting attendance. Supporters of the trail would also provide extensive volunteer labor to reduce the cost and form the core of the long term maintenance crew MORC Minnesotans for Off Road Cycling. MORC has been in the leadership role of developing the majority of trail systems across the metro. The President of MORC, Reed Smidt will be part of the presentation team and be handling the question and answer session. Edina High School Bike Club. Riders and coaches are trying to get the club organized and competing against other high schools. Young people involved in the sport will be part of the presentation team. Trail designers and trail contractors of Cuyuna Trails in Crosby MN. The top rated trail in the Minnesota. A huge success story in revitalizing the local area. Tim Wegner, the co-lead designer of Cuyuna will be part of the presentation team. How would the tail system get made? Trails are either constructed by professional trail designers and contractors, or large groups of volunteers and/or a combination of the two. The costs if built by professional contractors are approx. $3.00+ - per running foot or approximately $15,000 to $16,000 per mile. We envision the total trail system to be 5 to 7 miles long, so approx. $75,000 to $100,000 if fully funded by the city for a professional trail designer to come in and do %100 of the work. We would like to use the City of Woodbury’s experience in building a very similiar size trail system, Carver Lake, and their trail within a small park area that already had many different users and closeby residential neighbors. By being open and cooperative with residential neighbors, writing successful federal matching fund grants for recreational trail building, tapping into non-profits like the Tree Trust and the many biking community volunteers, and critically having a strong advocate and project manager in the park and rec dept., the final hard city cost was a small fraction of the original cost estimate that is similar to ours We know that the city has already released its 2 year capital expenditures report which doesn’t include mountain biking, although there is money for biking in general, but we still think the city could easily move ahead in 4 areas: 1. Authorize Initial Trail Design Authorize a fee for initial trail design of the entire area after the Commission selects a designer from an open bid process. This will include a close inspection of the entire terrain that can be used for trails and making an inventory of the area. 2. Begin talking with other park users and neighbors about project. Whatever is normally done when considering a new project. 3. Get bids on construction cost. Once trail design is complete, get cost bids on project using normal methods of selecting contractors on any city project 4. Appoint someone in Parks and Rec. Dept to be in charge of project. So that all the various people involved in the project can work together, develop action plan and start grant writing. In the metro area here is what other communities are doing Minneapolis Theodore Wirth 6 miles blue trails with a black cutoff to skills area.. Eagan Lebanon Hills 12 miles green, blue, black and red stacked trail system. Skills training park. Parking Lot with bathrooms and changing rooms. Savage Murphy Hammerhan Has some ridge sections similar to Braemar. Part of a huge park system. Woodbury Carver Lake A great example of what we could accomplish in Edina with very limited space and multiple park users and intimate neighborhood input. Elk River Hillside Champlin Elm Creek Burnsville Salem Hills Bloomington River Bottoms St. Paul Battle Creek Chaska Oaks Metro Cities and Park Systems have constructed numerous mountain biking trail parks across the twin cities seven county area . Mountain Biking trail systems have minimal impact on the natural environment. The trails are designed to become a natural part of the environment. A good one is kinda like a slightly larger deer trail that follows the natural topography of the area and is partially hidden from view from all the foliage. The fun and exciting trails bring new people into the park, especially rarely visited areas that many people don’t even know exist. Initial costs are very low, and can easily be combined with federal grant money and volunteer efforts to be a shining example of prudent uses of community resources. Maintenance requirements are minimal and mostly done by the local biking community. Mountain Biking is a fantastic way to stay healthy. Not only does it provide a robust cardio workout and turns your legs into steel, it tightens up your core, strengthens your back, and improves your balance and fine motor skills. Plus it is so much fun. People love riding the trails, being outdoors, losing themselves in the joy of the moment, and experiencing the pure exhilaration of movement and athleticism that is mountain biking. We would also like to incorporate buckthorn removal efforts during the trail building. The existing environmental situation is quite bad in that almost the entire area is being completely overrun by buckthorn so as the existing oaks, poplar and other trees die out, there are no new young trees to replace them, so eventually there will be only buckthorn left. Our clearing crew volunteers can clear huge areas if the city can help provide removal of cut trees from the site. These buckthorn removal efforts could be concentrated along the ridge tops to create stunning views from the new trails of the golf course, and the surrounding parklands. A rare elevated panoramic view in Edina Parks. Now is the perfect time to get started on a exciting natural addition to the city’s Park System, a first class mountain biking trail system that uses seldom visited parkland, begins serious restoration of our magnificent oak forests, and offers proven health benefits to all ages. Behind this project is a large group of enthusiastic, knowledgeable, and entrepreneurial minded supporters who know how to get things done and want to cut the cities hard cost to a minimum, yet provide residents with a first class but very inexpensive long term asset that can dramatically improve participants overall health, vitality, and simple happiness.. Reference Material We believe the that Woodbury’s experience in designing and building Carver Lake mountain biking trails is the perfect match for our effort to build a trail system around Braemar Park. Reed Smidt was that critical leader in the Woodbury Parks and Rec dept, that wrote the grant, worked with all the different players, and monitored the daily construction. He will be our featured speaker at the presentation. You Tube Videos “Cuyuna Mtn Biking” “ Lebanon Hills mtn biking” “Theo Wirth mtn biking”, “Carver Lake mtn biking” Every mtn biking place in minnesota has a Go Pro Helmet cam ride of the trail system plus endless more videos of every place in the metro and outstate mn Trail Maps: Cuyuna, Theodore Wirth, Lebanon Hills, Carver Lake. etc. Topographical Map of Area with a preliminary layout of a possible trail system. Google Earth Overview Marked for Parking, possible trail outline and color coded for phase I, II, and III Site Info and pictures Oak Savanna totally overrun with buckthorn, Soil glacial moraine. Existing walking trail system running down ridgelines that are rarely used. Open Invitation to walk the terrain and ride other cities trail system. Invitation to all members of the board to go riding and see what the excitement is all about. We provide bikes as needed and a tour of any of the great trail systems around the metro so you could really understand the idea better and realize the Braemar area’s potential to become a premier training ground for our high school student athletes. Also just to walk the seldom seen terrain that is so special but needs saving from buckthorn. From:Hales, Charlie To:Elmore-Trummer, Camille; Lannom, Thomas Cc:Edina Mail Subject:short term rentals Date:Sunday, June 26, 2016 11:42:46 PM Camille, Thomas - Mayor James Hovland in Edina is working on their approach to short term rentals. He is interested in looking at our approach for a possible model. Could you please: 1. Send him our ordinance, rules, and any other relevant documents, and 2. Put him in touch with the relevant folks in both BPS and Revenue who can provide further detail. Mayor, I have included both Camille Trummer, who handles planning issues in my office and Thomas Lannom, who heads our Revenue Bureau. They can be good points of contact here for your folks. Good to see you at the USCM, Mayor - between the wisdom of the Dalai Lama and the practical ideas of our colleagues, we all go home with something useful! Charlie HalesMayor, City of Portland charlie.hales@portlandoregon.gov503-823-4120 From:Ann Kattreh To:Lynette Biunno Cc:Janet Canton; lizgenovese@aol.com Subject:Fwd: Braemar in winter Date:Monday, June 27, 2016 9:23:28 AM Would you please put this in Council Correspondence? Thank you! Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0385 AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov Begin forwarded message: From: Liz Genovese <liz.genovese@gmail.com>Date: June 26, 2016 at 2:18:27 PM CDT To: <akattreh@edinamn.gov>, <chamber@edina.org>, <edinacouncil@edinamn.gov> Subject: Braemar in winter To Mayor Hovland, Council members and Ann Kattreh:I just caught part of the discussion on cable re: making snow for Braemar Park. I do not understand the priorities here. The City is pouring all kinds of money into all things Braemar and letting Arneson hang out to dry! Arneson is in danger of losing a lot of Austrian Pine. What is the plan to replace with suitable tree stock? Not to mention the development of the Park with a water feature and a nature play area, enhanced south end of the Allee for weddings etc.THe Edina Garden Council has been very active in enhancing the beauty of the Park and want the City to value this Park. It can produce some income but more importantly, it can be a place of refuge and beauty which is as much needed as hockey, baseball, soccer and lacrosse. Liz Genovese, Member Winahbar Garden Club. From:Karter, Scott To:Edina Mail Cc:Lannom, Thomas Subject:FW: short term rentals Date:Monday, June 27, 2016 11:01:05 AM Attachments:Portland Ordinance 186736.pdfPortland Ordinance 186976.pdfPortland Ordinance 186985.pdf Mayor Hovland, I’m responding on behalf of Thomas Lannom, the Director of the City of Portland Revenue Division. I have attached the relevant ordinances. Ordinance #186736 included several code changes that were unrelated to short-term rentals. The consolidated group of changes was referred to as RICAP 6. The more useful information would be at this link: www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/66547 , where the short-term rental changes in RICAP 6 are separately explained. Here are links to the two pages that show “where the rubber meets the road”: Revenue Division (for payment of the hotel/motel tax – www.portlandoregon.gov/revenue/article/415180 Bureau of Development Services (for compliance with zoning laws and permitting) - www.portlandoregon.gov/bds/65603 Feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the tax collection and enforcement. If you have questions regarding the permitting, Mike Liefeld at the Bureau of Development Services would be your best bet. Here is his contact information: (503) 823-7332, Michael.Liefeld@PortlandOregon.gov. If you are not sure who to contact about something, let me know and I can help point you in the right direction. Scott Scott Karter, CPA Audit and Accounting Manager Revenue Division - Bureau of Revenue and Financial Services City of Portland Office of Management & Finance 111 SW Columbia Street, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97201 (503) 865-2470 (503) 279-2672 (FAX) scott.karter@portlandoregon.govThe information contained in this email is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. From: Hales, Charlie Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 9:43 PM To: Elmore-Trummer, Camille <Camille.Trummer@portlandoregon.gov>; Lannom, Thomas <Thomas.Lannom@portlandoregon.gov> Cc: mail@edinamn.gov Subject: short term rentals Camille, Thomas - Mayor James Hovland in Edina is working on their approach to short term rentals. He is interested in looking at our approach for a possible model. Could you please: 1. Send him our ordinance, rules, and any other relevant documents, and 2. Put him in touch with the relevant folks in both BPS and Revenue who can provide further detail. Mayor, I have included both Camille Trummer, who handles planning issues in my office and Thomas Lannom, who heads our Revenue Bureau. They can be good points of contact here for your folks. Good to see you at the USCM, Mayor - between the wisdom of the Dalai Lama and the practical ideas of our colleagues, we all go home with something useful! Charlie Hales Mayor, City of Portlandcharlie.hales@portlandoregon.gov 503-823-4120 ORDINANCE No. SUBSTITUTE 18 6? 6 Improve land use regulations related to accessory short-term rentals through the Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RICAP 6) (Ordinance; Amend Title 33, Planning and Zoning, Title 3, Administration, and Title 6, Special Taxes) The City of Portland Ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: General Findings I. This project is part of the Regulatory Improvement Workplan, an ongoing program to improve City building and land use regulations and procedures. Each package of amendments is referred to as RlCAP (Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package), followed by a number. This ordinance pertains to the amendment items addressing short-term rentals contained in RICAP 6 and identified as items 12 -14. 2. During the spring and summer of 2013, staff from the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) and the Bureau of Development Services (BDS) worked together to develop a draft work plan for RICAP 6. Potential code amendments were drawn from a database that contains regulatory improvement requests. 3. On July 25, 2013, notice was sent to all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, and business associations in the city of Portland, as well as other interested parties, to notify them of the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing on the RICAP 6 Proposed Workplan. 4. On August 13, 2013 the Planning and Sustainability Commission held a hearing and adopted the RlCAP 6 work plan. The adopted work plan included 42 potential code amendment items. Three items were added after August 13, 2013, for a total of 45 potential code amendment items. 5. During the summer and fall of20l3, BPS staff conducted research, met with neighborhood land use chairs, and worked with BDS staff and staff from other City agencies to develop a proposal for each of the 45 potential code amendments. Thi1iy-four of the initial 45 work plan items were determined to warrant an amendment to the City Code; l l of the initial 45 were determined to not warrant an amendment to City Code. Thi1iy-one of the 34 proposed code amendment items relate to technical or minor policy issues, and three of the code amendment items relate to short-term rentals. This ordinance pertains to the three items related to shoti-term rentals (items 12-14); the remaining items are the subject of a separate ordinance. 6. On March l 8, 2014 notice of the proposed action was mailed to the Department of Land Conservation and Development in compliance with the post-acknowledgement review process required by OAR 660-018-0020 and ORS 197.610. 7. On March 20, 2014 notice of the RICAP 6 proposal and the April 22, 2014 Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing on the proposal was mailed to all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, and business associations in the city of Portland, as well as other interested persons, as required by ORS 227. 186 and PCC 33.740. Page I ol'20 1.86'7 6 8. On April 22, 2014 the Planning and Sustainability Commission held a hearing on the R!CAP 6 Proposed Drqft. The Planning and Sustainability Commission made four amendments to the proposal, and then voted to recommend approval of the RI CAP 6 proposed code amendment items and to forward them to City Council for adoption. 9. On May 13, 2014 notice of the June 4, 2014 City Council hearing on RICAP 6 was mailed to all who presented testimony orally or in writing to the Planning and Sustainability Commission and provided a name and address, those who asked for notice, and other interested parties. Findings on Statewide Planning Goals 10. State planning statutes require cities to adopt and amend comprehensive plans and land use regulations in compliance with state land use goals. Only the stated goals addressed below apply. 11. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, requires provision of opportunities for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The preparation of these amendments has provided several opportunities for public involvement. The amendments are supportive of this goal for the following reasons: a) Staff from the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability met with the Development Review Advisory Committee (DRAC) and the land use chairs of the city's neighborhood coalition offices on July 15, 2013, to review potential items for inclusion in the RICAP 6 work plan. b) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RICAP 6): Proposed Workplan was made available to the public for review on July 24, 2013. The repo1i was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. c) The Planning and Sustainability Commission held a public hearing on the RICAP 6 proposed work plan on August 13, 2013. Notice of the hearing was mailed to all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, and other interested parties on July 25, 2013. cl) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RICAP 6): Discussion Draft was made available to the public for review on January 6, 2014. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website, and mailed to all who requested a copy. e) Notice of the RICAP 6 discussion draft was also mailed on January 8, 2014 to over 750 recipients, including neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, and other interested parties. The notice included the dates, times and locations of neighborhood association or neighborhood coalition meetings, and a BPS sponsored open house, during which project staff presented the draft for discussions and questions. t) Project staff attended six neighborhood coalition meetings, and two neighborhood association meetings between January 6, and February 21, 2014. The RI CAP 6 discussion draft repo1i was presented and discussed at each of these meetings 2 oC20 186'7 6 g) Project staff presented the RlCAP 6 discussion draft report at one Design Commission meeting, one Historic Landmarks Commission meeting, and one Planning & Sustainability Commission meeting. h) Project staff were available to discuss the RI CAP 6 discussion draft at an open house held on February 11, 2014 from 5:00 pm to 7:30 pm. i) On March l 8, 20 l 4 notice of the proposed action was mailed to the Department of Land Conservation and Development in compliance with the post-acknowledgement review process required by OAR 660-018-0020 and ORS 197.610. j) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RICAP 6): Proposed Draft was made available to the public for review on March 21, 2014. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. k) The Planning and Sustainability Commission held a public hearing on the RfCAP 6 proposed draft on April 22, 2014. Notice of the hearing was mailed to the regional transit agency, Metro, the Oregon Department of Transportation, all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, affected bureaus, and other interested parties on March 20, 2014, as required by ORS 227.186 and PCC 33.740. The Planning and Sustainability Commission made four amendments to the proposed draft and voted to recommend the amendments be approved and forwarded to the city council for adoption. I) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RJCAP 6): Recommended Drqfi was made available to the public for review on May 19, 2014. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. m) City Council held a public hearing on the RI CAP 6 recommended draft on June 4, 2014. Notice of the hearing was mailed on May 13, 2014 to all who testified orally or in writing at the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing, and to other persons who requested such notice. The findings addressing Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 9, Citizen Involvement, and its related policies also demonstrate consistency with this goal. 12. Goal 2, Land Use Planning, requires the development of a process and policy framework that acts as a basis for all land use decisions and assures that decisions and actions are based on an understanding of the facts relevant to the decision. The process for identifying and adopting the RI CAP 6 accessory short-term rental amendments (RICAP items 12-14) supports this goal for the following reasons: 0 The process followed all procedures required by Title 33.740, Legislative Procedures, OAR 660- 018-0020, ORS 227.186 and ORS 197.610; 0 The amendments meets relevant goals and policies of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan as described in the findings for Portland's Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies; 0 The amendments are based on relevant facts in the record including an estimate of the number of accessory short-term rentals being operated in the city; the number of complaints received about unauthorized accessory short-term rentals; a review of policies and regulations related to accessory short-term rentals being implemented in New York City, NY, San Francisco, CA, Cannon Beach, OR, Ashland, OR, Austin, TX, and Amsterdam, The Netherlands; a survey of accessory short-term rental operators in Portland conducted by Airbnb; a review of several accessory short-term rental websites; a review of relevant City and State regulations pertaining to lodgings and lodging taxation; and testimony in the record. 3 of 20 ~ 186'7 u See also findings addressing Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal l, Metropolitan Coordination, and its related policies and objectives. 13. Goal 5, Open Space, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources, requires the conservation of open space and the protection of natural, historic and scenic resources. These amendments are consistent with this goal because they eliminate the need for a conditional use review for accessory short-term rental facilities that rent up to two bedrooms to overnight guests. By eliminating the cost and time associated with a conditional use review, the amendments facilitate use of unused bedrooms in a historic home as an accessory short-term rental, and the income generated from the accessory use may allow the owner to invest in maintaining, and therefore protecting, the historic home. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Policy 2.21, Existing Housing Stock, also demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with this goal. 14. Goal 9, Economic Development, requires provision of adequate opportunities for a variety of economic activities vital to public health, welfare, and prosperity. These amendments are consistent with this goal by removing a cost barrier to establishing a Type A accessory short-term rental in a house, attached house, accessory dwelling unit, duplex, or manufactured home on its own lot, thereby facilitating the use of these types of dwelling units for economic activity. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 5, Economic Development also demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with this goal. 15. Goal 10, Housing, requires provision for the housing needs of citizens of the state. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 4, Housing, and relevant sub-policies and objectives, demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with Goal l 0. 16. Goal 12, Transportation, requires provision of a safe, convenient, and economic transpotiation system. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 6, Transpotiation, and relevant sub- policies demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with Goal 12. 17. The Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) was adopted in 1991 and amended in 1996, 2005 and 2012 to implement State Goal 12. The TPR requires cetiain findings if a proposed Comprehensive Plan Map amendment, zone change, or regulation will significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility. These amendments will not have a significant effect on existing or planned transportation facilities because, as demonstrated in the findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 6 and related sub- policies, the amendments ensure that the number of trips generated by a household living use with an accessory short-term rental use will not exceed the number of trips generated by a household living use without an accessory short-term rental. 18. Goal 14, Urbanization, requires provision of an orderly and efficient transition of rural lands to urban use, the efficient use of land, and the provision of livable communities. The findings for Potiland Comprehensive Plan Goal 2, Urban Development, Goal 3, Neighborhoods, and their relevant sub-policies demonstrates that these amendments provide for livable communities and are therefore consistent with this goal. Findings on JVIetro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan 19. The following clements of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan are relevant and applicable to the accessory short-term rental amendments. 4 of20 20. Title 1, Housing Capacity, requires cities and or counties to maintain or increase its housing capacity. This requirement is to be generally implemented through city-wide analysis based on calculated capacities from land use designations. These amendments are consistent with this title because they do not allow conversion of a housing unit in a residential zone to a motel or other commercial use as some testimony suggests. The amendments ensure that the accessory short-term rental use remains accessory to the primary household living use on a site. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 4, Housing, and relevant sub-policies also demonstrate that these amendments are consistent with this title. 21. Title 4, Industrial and other Employment Areas, seeks to provide and protect a supply of sites for employment by limiting the types and scale of non-industrial uses in Regionally Significant Industrial Areas (RSIAs), Industrial and Employment Areas. Title 4 also seeks to provide the benefits of "clustering" to those industries that operate more productively and efficiently in proximity to one another than in dispersed locations. These amendments do not increase the type or scale of non- industrial uses allowed in RSfAs, Industrial or General Employment zones for the reasons stated below: e The amendments do not allow establishment of a primary household living use in the Industrial or Employment zones. The amendments only allow establishment of an accessory short-term rental in a house, attached house, accessory dwelling unit, duplex, or manufactured home on its own lot in the Industrial and Employments zones in cases where the dwelling also has a legally established, non-conforming primary household living use. The amendments also contain provisions that limit the scale of the non-industrial activity including a limit on the total number of guests and residents occupying a dwelling unit to no more than the number allowed for a household, and a limit on the number of bedrooms that can be rented to overnight guests; e A short-term rental (temporary lodging) can also be considered a Retail Sales and Service use, and Retail Sales and Service uses are currently allowed outright in an Industrial or General Employment zone. Up to one Retail Sales and Service use, with maximum of 3,000 square feet, is allowed in an IG l zone, up to four Retail Sales and Service uses, with a maximum of 3,000 square feet each, are allowed in the IG2 and IH zones, and up to 60,000 square feet of Retail Sales and Service use, or up to an FAR of l: 1, is allowed in the EG zones. For these reasons, the amendments do not conflict with Title 4. The findings addressing Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 6, Transportation, also demonstrate that the amendments do not conflict with Title 4. 22. Title 7, Housing Choice, ensures opportunities for affordable housing at all income levels, and calls for a choice of housing types. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 4, Housing, Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, Policy 4.8, Regional Housing Opportunities, Policy 4.9, Fair . Housing, Policy 4.10, Housing Diversity, and 4.11, Affordable Housing demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with this title. 23. Title 12, Protection of Residential Neighborhoods, calls for protecting the region's existing residential neighborhoods from air and water pollution, noise and crime, and providing adequate levels of public services. Testimony in the record asserts that the amendments will introduce '"stranger clanger' ... " into single-dwelling neighborhoods and render Neighborhood Watch programs ineffective. No evidence was provided to demonstrate that allowing Type A accessory short-term rentals without a conditional use review will reduce the safety of, or increase crime in, residential neighborhoods. On the contrary, the City of Portland Crime Prevention Program Manager provided written testimony stating the following: "The community member who has stated that shoti term rentals would destroy her Neighborhood Watch because it would bring strangers to her street misses 5 oC20 186736 the point of our instructions to get to know one's neighbors. The point of knowing one's neighbors is not to exclude everyone else, but to have a network. A neighborhood network can thrive whether or not guests or strangers are present. In short, I do not agree with the argument that short term rentals would nullify existing Neighborhood Watches." The Council finds the Program Manager's testimony is credible and persuasive that the amendments are consistent with Title 12. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 8, Environment demonstrate that the amendments will limit potential impacts from noise. Findings on Portland's Comprehensive Plan Goals 24. The following goals, policies, and objectives of the Portland Comprehensive Plan are relevant and applicable to the accessory short-term rentals amendments. GOAL 1, METROPOLITAN COORDINATION 25. Goal 1, Metropolitan Coordination, calls for the Comprehensive Plan to be coordinated with federal and state law and to support regional goals, objectives and plans. The amendments are consistent with this goal because notification of the proposal, and an opportunity to provide comment at a public hearing before the Planning and Sustainability Commission, was provided to the Oregon Depaitment of Land Conservation and Development per ORS 197.610, and to Metro, Tri-Met, and the Oregon Department of Transportation per 33.740.020. In addition, nothing within these amendments changes or affects the Urban Growth Boundary, Urban Planning Area Boundary, or Urban Services Boundary. GOAL 2, URBAN DEVELOPMENT 26. Goal 2, Urban Development, and Policy 2.2, Urban Diversity call for maintaining Potiland's role as the major regional employment and population center through public policies that encourage expanded opportunity for housing and jobs, while retaining the character of established residential neighborhoods and business centers. The amendments are consistent with this goal because they encourage expanded opportunity for home-based jobs, while retaining the character of existing residential neighborhoods. An accessory short-term rental is where a long-term resident rents bedrooms in their dwelling to overnight guests. Accessory short-term rentals are currently allowed in houses in residential zones as a conditional use. Approval of a facility currently requires a quasi- judicial conditional use review. These amendments establish Type A (one or two bedrooms) and Type B (three to five bedrooms) accessory short-term rentals, and eliminate the need for a conditional use review for facilities that rent up to two bedrooms to overnight guests. Operating an accessory short- term rental is a home-based occupation, and eliminating the need for a $4,130 conditional use review (CU fee as of May 2014) in order to establish a Type A accessory short-term rental will encourage this type of home-based occupation. In addition to encouraging home-based jobs, the amendments include provisions that address several common elements of neighborhood character such as use, intensity, and accessory home occupations: • Use. The amendments do not allow a home in a neighborhood to be converted to a full-time, short-term rental. The amendments ensure that the accessory short-term rental remains an accessory use to a primary household living use on a site. This is accomplished by requiring that a long-term resident live in the dwelling unit in which the rooms will be rented. On sites that have an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), the resident may reside in the primary dwelling and rent rooms in the ADU or vice versa; 6 ot'20 <11 Intensity. The amendments limit a Type A accessory short-term rental to offering no more than two bedrooms to overnight guests, and require a conditional use review, which includes notice and a public hearing, for facilities that rent more than two bedrooms per night; <11 fntensity. The amendments limit the total number of guests and residents occupying a dwelling with an accessory short-term rental to no more than the number allowed for a household (per 3 3. 91 0.03 O; one or more persons related by blood, marriage, legal adoption, guardianship, or domestic partnership plus not more than 5 other persons). This provision ensures that the number of residents and guests coming and going from the home with bedrooms rented on a short-term basis does not exceed the number of residents allowed to come and go from other homes in the neighborhood without an accessory short-term rental; e Accessory home occupation. The amendments prohibit the establishment of a Type B accessory home occupation in a dwelling unit with an accessory short-term rental, and prohibiting non- resident employees and commercial meetings in a Type A accessory short-term rental. A Type B accessory home occupation is one in which the resident uses their home as place of work, and has one employee or up to eight customers per day. This provision is intended to limit potential impacts that additional trips to and from a dwelling with an accessory shoti-term rental may have on the surrounding neighborhood; Finally, the amendments allow the Type A accessory shori-term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the regulations of 33.207. 27. Policy 2.9, Residential Neighborhoods, calls for allowing for a range of housing types to accommodate increased population growth while improving and protecting the city's residential neighborhoods. The amendments are consistent with this policy because they continue to allow a range of housing types in the city, and they include provisions that protect the integrity of the city's residential neighborhoods as described in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development. Testimony in the record asserts that the amendments do not protect residential neighborhoods because they do not limit accessory short-term rentals to owner-occupied dwelling units. The amendments will allow either the property owner or a long-term renter to rent bedrooms to overnight guests as long the dwelling unit has a primary resident (defined as someone who occupies the dwelling unit for at least 270 days per year), and, except in the case of an ADU, the primary resident lives in the dwelling unit in which the rooms will be rented. However, there is no evidence in the record to suppori the claim that allowing a long-term renter to establish an accessory short-term rental will compromise neighborhood safety, destabilize residential neighborhoods, or otherwise fail to protect the city's residential neighborhoods. On the contrary, the Planning Commission received testimony from 36 people who rent bedrooms to overnight guests, and 14 of the 3 6 testified that the additional income has allowed them to stay in their homes, which arguably contributes to neighborhood stability. This issue was discussed extensively at the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing, and the Commissioners could find no rational basis to treat long-term renters differently than resident owners. 28. Policy 2.14, Industrial Sanctuaries, calls for providing industrial sanctuaries and encouraging the growth of industrial activities by preserving industrial land primarily for manufacturing purposes. For the reasons stated below, these amendments are consistent with this policy because they do not increase the type or scale of non-industrial uses allowed in the Industrial Sanctuaries: <11 The amendments do not allow establishment of a primary household living use in the Industrial or Employment zones. The amendments only allow establishment of an accessory shori-term rental in a house, attached house, accessory dwelling unit, duplex, or manufactured home in the Industrial and Employments zones in cases where the dwelling also has a legally established, non-conforming primary household living use. The amendments also contain provisions that limit the scale of the non-industrial activity including a limit on the total number of guests and 7 ot' 20 186736 residents occupying a dwelling unit to no more than the number allowed for a household, and a limit on the number of bedrooms that can be rented to overnight guests; @ A short-term rental (temporary lodging) is currently allowed outright in the city's Industrial zones. Up one Retail Sales and Service use, with maximum of 3,000 square feet, is allowed in an IG I zone, and up to four Retail Sales and Service uses, with a maximum of 3,000 square feet each, are allowed in the IG2 and IH zones. The findings for Title 4 and Goal 6, Transportation, also demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with this policy. 29. Policy 2.15, Living Closer to Work, calls for locating greater residential densities near major employment centers, locating affordable housing close to employment centers, and encouraging home-based work where the nature of the work is not disruptive to the neighborhood. As described in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development, the amendments encourage home-based work, and include provisions that will protect neighborhoods. Accessory sho1i-term rentals are currently allowed as a conditional use in houses in residential zones. These amendments establish Type A and Type B accessory short-term rentals, and eliminate the need for a conditional use review in order to establish a Type A accessory short-term rental in a house, attached house, accessory dwelling unit, duplex, or manufactured home on its own lot. A Type A accessory short-term rental is one where no more than two bedrooms are rented on a short-term basis. A Type B accessory short-term rental allows renting up to 5 bedrooms to overnight guests, and will continue to require a conditional use review. Operating an accessory short-term rental is a home-based occupation, and the elimination of the conditional use review fee ($4130 application fee as of May 2014) will encourage this type of job. The amendments also include provisions that limit disruption in the neighborhood: ® The amendments ensure that the short-term rental remains an accessory use to the primary household living use on the site by limiting the number of bedrooms rented, requiring that long- term primary resident live in the dwelling unit in which the rooms will be rented, and requiring that the dwelling unit be the long-term resident's primary residence; • The amendments limit the total number of guests and residents occupying a dwelling unit to no more than the number allowed for a household. A household is defined as one or more persons related by blood, marriage, legal adoption, guardianship, or domestic partnership plus not more than 5 other persons (per 33.910.030). This limitation ensures that the number ofresiclents and guests corning and going from a dwelling in which bedrooms are rented on a short-term basis does not exceed the number of residents allowed to come and go from other homes in the neighborhood that do not have an accessory short-term rental; • The amendments include a requirement that the operator of the accessory shoti term rental notify neighbors and the property owner of the accessory use. The notice must describe the operation and the number of bedrooms to be rented to overnight guests, provide contact information, and describe how the regulations of33.207 will be met. In addition, the notification must be updated every two years; • The amendments prohibit the establishment of a Type B accessory home occupation in a dwelling unit with an accessory sho1i-term rental. This will limit the impacts that more than one home- basecl accessory occupations could have on a neighborhood. A Type B accessory home occupation is one in which the resident uses their home as place of work, and has one employee or up to eight customers per clay. Type A accessory home occupations where a resident uses their home as a home office but does not have employees or customers will continue to be allowed; @ The amendments prohibit non-resident employees and commercial meetings in a Type A accessory short-term rental; and 11> The amendments allow a Type A accessory short-term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the regulations of33.207. 8 of'20 1''~73ftJ {) u Q, 0 Testimony in the record asserts that the amendments do not support this policy because they will reduce the availability of long-term, affordable rental housing. The testimony is not relevant to Policy 2.15, which is focused on promoting, as its title states, living close to work. Policy 2.15 is not an affordable housing policy. fn addition, no evidence was provided that demonstrates a relationship between allowing the type of short-term rentals the amendments will permit and the loss of long-term housing. The amendments do not allow a dwelling unit in a residential zone to be converted from a household living use to a commercial use; they only allow bedrooms in a home with a primary household living use to be rented on a short-term basis. The amendments require that a long-term resident live in the dwelling unit, limit the number of bedrooms that can be rented, and do not allow accessory short-term rentals in multi-dwelling structures (structures with 3 or more units). These provisions are intended to ensure that housing units, including long term rental housing units, are not removed from the market. 30. Policy 2.21 Existing Housing Stock, calls for providing full utilization of larger single-family homes with conditions that preserve the character of the neighborhood and prevent speculation. The amendments are consistent with this policy. Accessory short-term rentals are currently allowed in houses in residential zones as a conditional use. Approval of a facility requires a quasi-judicial conditional use review. These amendments eliminate the need for a conditional use review for facilities that rent up to two bedrooms to overnight guests. By eliminating the cost and time associated with a conditional use review, the amendments facilitate the full utilization of bedrooms in larger single-family homes. These amendments also preserve the character of the neighborhood, thus preventing speculation, because the amendments include provisions that ensure the short-term rental remains an accessory use to the primary household living use on a site. This is accomplished by: "' Ensuring that a long-term primary resident continue to live in the dwelling unit in which the accessory short-term rental will be established. The long-term resident must occupy the dwelling for at least 270 clays per calendar year; "' Limiting Type A accessory short-term rentals to offering no more than two bedrooms to overnight guests, and requiring a conditional use review, which includes notice and a public hearing, for facilities that rent more than two bedrooms per night; • Limiting the total number of guests and residents occupying a dwelling unit to no more than the number allowed for a household (per 33 .910.030: one or more persons related by blood, marriage, legal adoption, guardianship, or domestic pa1inership plus not more than 5 other persons). This provision ensures that the number of residents and guests coming and going from a dwelling with an accessory sho1i-term rental does not exceed the number of residents allowed to come and go from other homes in the neighborhood that do not have an accessory short-term rental; • Requiring that the operator of the accessory short term rental notify neighbors and the property owner of the accessory use. The notification must describe the operation and the number of bedrooms to be rented to overnight guests, provide contact information, and describe how the requirements of 33 .207 will be met. fn aclclition, the notification must be updated every two years; "' Limiting the impacts from more than one home-based accessory occupations. The amendments prohibit the establishment of a Type B accessory home occupation in a dwelling unit with an accessory shoti-term rental. A Type B accessory home occupation is one in which the resident uses their home as place of work and has one employee or up to eight customers per clay; • Prohibiting non-resident employees and commercial meetings in a Type A accessory short-term rental; and e Allowing the Type A accessory shorHerm rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the regulations of 33.207. 9 of20 186736 Testimony in the record states that allowing short-term rentals in single-dwelling neighborhoods will increase speculation. The testimony does not provide evidence to support the conclusion. The testimony posits that the "active turnover of users" will contribute to speculation. However, as stated above, the amendments limit the total number of residents and guests occupying the dwelling unit to the same number allowed to occupy a dwelling without an accessory short-term rental. Thus, the number of "users" coming and going from the dwelling can be no more than the number that can come and go from neighboring dwellings, and there is no evidence in the record to suggest that the number of trips made to and from a dwelling with an accessory short-term rental will be more than the number of trips made to and from a dwelling without an accessory short-term rental. In addition, as mentioned above, the amendments prohibit the establishment of a Type B accessory home occupation in a dwelling with an accessory short-term rental. A Type B accessory home occupation allows up to eight customers coming and going per day. Eliminating this allowance further reduces the number of potential trips that a dwelling with an accessory shoti-term rental could generate. GOAL 3, NEIGHBORHOODS 3 1. Goal 3, Neighborhoods, calls for preserving and reinforcing the stability and diversity of the city's neighborhoods while allowing for increased density in order to attract and retain long-term residents and businesses and insure the city's residential quality and economic vitality. The amendments are consistent with this goal and preserve the stability of the city's neighborhoods for the reasons stated in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development, the Goal 2 sub-policies, and the findings below. 32. Policy 3.2, Social Conditions, call for providing and coordinating programs to promote neighborhood interest, concern and security and to minimize the social impact of land use decisions. The amendments promote neighborhood interest and concern because they require the operator to notify neighbors before the accessory short-term rental is approved. The notification must include a description of the operation and the number of rooms to be rented to overnight guests. The notification must also include contact information for the operator and describe how the standards of the Title 33.207 will be met. This notification must be updated every two years. The amendments also address neighborhood concern and security because they include an amendment to Title 3 .30.040.8.5 allowing the Type A accessory short-term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the regulations of Title 33.207. If the permit is revoked, a new permit will not be issued to the operator at that residence for two years. Testimony in the record asserts that the amendments conflict with this policy because they do not provide full disclosure of the impacts of the use, make rental properties available mainly to "well-to-do Caucasian ambulatory tourists and visitors'', promote discrimination, and displace residents. No evidence was provided to support these conclusions. Additionally, the issues raised in the testimony are not relevant to the policy in question. Policy 3 .2 is aimed at City programs that promote neighborhood interest, and is not aimed at discrimination or displacement. 33. Policy 3.3 Neighborhood Diversity, calls for promoting neighborhood diversity and security by encouraging a diversity in age, income, race and ethnic background within the City's neighborhoods. The amendments are consistent with this policy. The amendments eliminate the need for a conditional use review in order to establish a Type A accessory short-term rental. By eliminating the cost and time associated with a conditional use review, the amendments reduce barriers to establishing this type of home-based occupation. The income generated by the accessory short-term rental may help owners and renters reduce household expenses, including costs associated with rent or a mortgage. According to a survey of accessory short-term rental operators in Portland, the typical host earns an average of $6,860 per year. Fourteen of the 36 operators of accessory short-term rental facilities who testified at the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing stated that the income generated from the short-term rental allowed them to remain in their home during times of financial hardship. !O of20 Other testimony in the record suggests that the amendments conflict with this policy because they do not provide full disclosure of the impacts of the use, they make rental properties available mainly to "well-to-do Caucasian ambulatory tourists and visitors", they promote discrimination, and displace residents. No evidence was provided to support these conclusions. As mention in the findings for Policy 3.2, Social Conditions, the amendments promote neighborhood interest and concern by requiring notification to neighbors, and local neighborhood and business associations, and by allowing a Type A accessory short-term rental permit to be revoked if the regulations of Title 33.207 are not met. Additionally, the findings for Policy 4.9, Fair Housing, demonstrate that the amendments do not promote discrimination. The amendments are intended to discourage unintended displacement of long-term residents because they to do not allow a dwelling to be converted to a full time, short- term rental, they ensure that the short-term rental use remains accessory to a primary household living use on the site, and they ensure that only homes with long-term residents are allowed to accommodate overnight guests. The regulations specifically limit the number of bedrooms that can be rented on a short-term basis, and require that the a long-term resident occupy the dwelling where the rooms will be rented (except that on a site with an ADU, the resident may live in the primary dwelling and rent rooms in the ADU or vice versa). 34. Policy 3.5, Neighborhood Involvement, provides for the active involvement of neighborhood residents and businesses in decisions affecting their neighborhood, and calls for providing information to neighborhood and business associations which allows them to monitor the impacts of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendments support this policy because they require that neighborhood associations and business associations be notified when a Type A accessory short-term rental is established within their boundaries. The notification will provide the associations with contact information for the operator, a description of the operation and the number of rooms to be rented to overnight guests, and a description of how the operation meets the other standards of Title 33.207. GOAL 4, HOUSING 35. Goal 4, Housing, calls for enhancing Portland's vitality as a community at the center of the region's housing market by providing housing of different types, density, sizes, costs and locations that accommodates the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of current and future households. The amendments are consistent with this policy because they include provisions aimed at preserving housing, and the amendments accommodate the needs and preferences of current households. The amendments preserve housing by prohibiting the conversion of an entire housing unit in a residential zone to a motel or other commercial use as some testimony suggests. In all cases, an accessory short- term rental must be an accessory use to a primary household living use on a site. The regulations: o Require that a long-term resident live in the dwelling unit in which the rooms will be rented. On sites that have an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), the resident may reside in the primary residence and rent bedrooms in the ADU or vice versa; o Require that the dwelling unit be the long-term resident's primary residence; o Limit the number of bedrooms being rented to overnight guests to not more than two, and require a conditional use review for facilities that rent more than two bedrooms per night. The amendments also accommodate the needs and preference of current households as expressed by people who provided testimony on the amendments to the Planning and Sustainability Commission. The Planning and Sustainability Commission received testimony from 36 people who rent a bedroom in their homes to overnight guests. Many of the 36 testified that renting a room to guests has allowed them to increase their income, and 14 of the 36 testified that the additional income has allowed them to stay in their homes. 11 of 20 186736 36. Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, calls for retaining housing potential by requiring no net loss of land reserved for, or committed to, residential, or mixed-use. This policy is implemented by an approval criterion applied to quasi-judicial Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments that requires no net loss of potential housing units when a requested amendment is from a residential or the urban commercial Comprehensive Plan Map designation to a non-residential map designation (33.810.050.A.2). These amendments do not conflict with this policy because they do not amend, change, or undermine this approval criterion. Testimony in the record argues that the amendments conflict with this policy because they "effectively permit commercial uses in direct conflict with Housing Policy 4.2." No evidence was provided to support this conclusion. As stated in the findings for Goal 4, Housing, the amendments do not allow housing units in residential zones to be converted from residential to commercial use. The amendments specifically require that the short-term rental be accessory to a primary household living use on a site and, as a result, help to maintain the residential character of existing neighborhoods. The regulations: • Require that a long-term resident live in the dwelling unit in which the rooms will be rented. On sites that have an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), the resident may reside in the primary residence and rent bedrooms in the ADU or vice versn; @ Require that the dwelling unit have a primary, long-term resident (the long-term resident must occupy the dwelling for at least 270 days per calendar year); • Limit Type A accessory short-term rentals to renting no more than two bedrooms to overnight guests, and requiring a conditional use review for facilities that rent more than two bedrooms per night. 37. Policy 4.4 Housing Safety, calls for ensuring a safe and healthy built environment and assisting in the preservation of sound existing housing and the improvement of neighborhoods. These amendments support this policy because they require the operator of an accessory short-term rental to verify that the bedrooms to be rented met the building code requirements for sleeping rooms at the time they were created or converted, that each floor on which a room with be rented has at least one carbon monoxide alarm, and each bedroom has a smoke detector that is interconnected with smoke detectors in an adjacent hallway. These requirements are intended to ensure that guest can exit the dwelling rapidly and safely in the event of a fire or other emergency. These amendments also support the preservation of sound housing because they make it easier for a long-term resident to establish a Type A accessory short-term rental in the house, attached house, accessory dwelling unit, duplex, or manufactured home in which they live. A Type A accessory short- term rental is a home-based occupation that will generate income for the resident, increasing the chances that the resident will invest in improvements that keep the home sound. Testimony in the record argues that the amendments conflict with this policy because they will establish "commercial uses as a 'by-right' in all Single Dwelling residential zones ... ", because they do not allow neighbors the oppotiunity to comment, and because they conflict with Neighborhood Watch activities promoted by the Office of Neighborhood Involvement. As stated in the findings for Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, these amendments do not allow housing units in a residential zones to be converted from residential to commercial use. As stated in the findings for Policy 3 .2, Social Conditions and Policy 3 .5, Neighborhood Involvement, the establishment of an accessory short-term rental requires notification to neighbors, neighborhood associations, and business associations. Issues raised in the testimony regarding Neighborhood Watch activities are not relevant to this policy, as Policy 4.4 is directed at the safety of the housing structure. 38. Policy 4.5, Housing Conservation, calls for restoring, rehabilitating, and conserving existing sound housing as one method of maintaining housing as a physical asset that contributes to an area's desired character. These amendments are consistent with this policy because they eliminate a $4, 130 cost barrier (current cost of a Type ll conditional use review) to establishing a Type A accessory short- 12 of20 186736 term rental. The absence of the fee may encourage more homeowners to take advantage of this type of home-based occupation, and increase their income by an average of $6,860 per year (Airbnb survey, 2014). The income generated from the accessory short-term rental may allow the homeowner to restore or rehabilitate their home, thereby conserving existing sound housing. 39. Policy 4.7, Balanced Communities, call for livable mixed-income neighborhoods throughout Portland that collectively reflect the diversity of housing types, tenures (rental and ownership) and income levels of the region. Testimony in the record asserts that the amendments conflict with this policy and policy objective B, which calls for maintaining income diversity within neighborhoods by allowing a mix of housing types and tenures, and ensuring that income diversity is maintained over the long-term. The testimony posits that these amendments will "eviscerate the number of long-term rentals in these areas ... ". No evidence was presented to support this conclusion. As stated in the findings for Goal 4, Housing, and Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, these amendments do not allow housing units in residential zones to be converted from residential use to commercial use, therefore these amendments do not conflict with this policy. 40. Policy 4.8, Regional Housing Opportunities, ensures oppotiunities for economic and racial integration throughout the region by advocating for the development of a range of housing options affordable to all income levels throughout the region. Policy 4.8, Objective A calls for advocating for a regional "fair share" strategy for meeting the housing needs of low, moderate, and higher-income households and people in protected classes in cities and counties throughout the region, and Policy 4.8 Objective B calls for supporting regulations and incentives that encourage the production and preservation of housing that is affordable throughout the region. Testimony in the record asserts that these amendments conflict with the policy and objectives because they will result in the "loss of long- term rental housing". The testifier provided evidence for this conclusion by describing an Oregonian article (no elate or title of the article was provided in the testimony) in which one accessory short-term rental operator stated that she would go back to renting her unused bedroom to a long-term renter if the short-term rental option is not allowed. On the contrary, at least one person who testified at the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing stated that she preferred the flexibility and that comes with renting her bedroom on a sho1i-term basis, and would not rent her room to a long-term renter. In addition, as stated in the findings for Goal 4, Housing, and Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, these amendments will not encourage the loss of long-term rentals becaus.e they do not allow the conversion of housing units in residential zones from a primary residential use to a primary commercial use. 4 l. Policy 4.9, Fair Housing, calls for freedom of choice in housing type, tenure, and neighborhood for all, regardless of race, color, age, gender, familial status, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, source of income or disability. Testimony in the record asserts that these amendments conflict with this policy and its objectives because "Short Term Rentals ... become an unregulated market for discriminatory rental practices". City Code Title 23.01 and Oregon Revised Statute 659A.403 prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, marital status, familial status, age if over 18, or disability in places of public accommodation, such as lodgings, and in the selling, leasing or renting of real property. This ordinance does not reduce or nullify in any way the prohibition of discrimination contained in City Code Title 23.01 or ORS 659A. 42. Policy 4.10, Housing Diversity, promotes the creation of a range of housing types, prices, and rents to l) create culturally and economically diverse neighborhoods; and 2) allow those whose housing needs change to find housing that meets their needs within their existing community. Testimony in the record posits that the amendments conflict with this policy and its objectives because they will cause housing types such as accessory dwelling units, manufactured homes, and individual bedrooms lo be displaced. Title 33.9 lO defines residential structure types as the f()llowing: accessory dwelling Page !3 of20 18 s 6 unit, attached duplex, attached house, duplex, group living structure, house, houseboat, manufactured dwelling, multi-dwelling development, multi-dwelling structure, single-room occupancy housing, and triplex. An individual room within a dwelling unit is not identified as a housing type. These amendments allow a long-term resident living in a house, attached house, accessory dwelling unit, duplex, or manufactured home on its own lot to rent rooms within the home to overnight guests. In the case of a site with accessory dwelling unit (ADU), the amendments allow the resident to live in the house, attached house, or manufactured home on its own lot and rent rooms in the ADU or vice versa (and ADU is not allowed with a duplex). In either ease, the number of bedrooms that can be rented on a short-term basis and the number of total residents and guest on the site is limited. Furthermore, as stated in the findings for Goal 4, Housing, and Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, these amendments will not cause housing types to be displaced because they do not allow housing units in residential zones to be conve1ied from a primary residential use to a primary commercial use. 43. Policy 4.11 Affordability, promotes the development and preservation of quality housing that is affordable across the full spectrum of household incomes. The amendments are consistent with this policy because the change to the accessory short-term rental regulations will not affect the supply of needed affordable housing for the following reasons: • The regulations do not allow conversions of needed housing in residential zones from a residential use to a commercial use. The amendments ensure that the primary use of the dwelling remains household living. The regulations allow a long-term resident to rent unused bedrooms within their primary residence to overnight guests, and the regulations limit the number of bedrooms that can be rented on a short-term basis. • In many cases a conditional use review will no longer be required, and the absence of a quasi- j udicial application fee may well increase the number of householders establishing accessory shoti-term rentals. Testimony in the record asserts that the ability to receive income from overnight guests may increase the ability of long-term residents to afford the cost of maintaining their homes or remain in their home during times of financial struggle. • Any economic effects of the amended regulations are limited to lowering the entrance costs to short-term rentals by eliminating the cost of a conditional use review ($4, 130 application fee). The amended regulations will require a permit fee and the installation of interconnected smoke detectors plus a carbon monoxide detector, costs that are together unlikely to exceed $1,000. Assuming that all the reduced entrance costs fully translate to a corresponding increase in the value of residential property, this increase is limited to less than $4, 130. The median home price in Portland is $285,000, while the mean home price in Portland is $448, 778 ("Portland Market Trends" 2014). A $4,000 increase in price is a 1.4 percent increase in the median price, and a .08 percent increase in the mean price, not enough to render affordable housing unaffordable. • Home Forward (formerly Housing Authority of Portland) is a government agency that owns homes and makes them available to rent by households earning less than sixty-percent of median metropolitan statistical area income. Rental agreements for these homes always contain a prohibition on subletting that will prohibit accessory short-term rentals. The amendments will therefore not affect the affordability of this publically owned housing. fn addition, they will not affect affordable housing obtained through the Housing Choice Voucher Program funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and administered by Home Forward. This program is commonly referred to as Section 8, and it provides rent assistance to low-income residents. The assistance voucher can be used for renting an apatiment or a house, but it cannot be used to rent a room in a house. 14 o1'20 1867 a Testimony in the record asserts that the amendments conflict with Policy 4. I I because they permit owners to raise rents astronomically, and encourage the reduction of available housing. No evidence was provided to support this conclusion. Nothing in the existing zoning regulations addresses rental rates or prevents owners from raising rent. Rental rates are driven by conditions in the marketplace; many factors affect these conditions and therefore rental rates. The amendments eliminate the need for a conditional use review in order establish a Type A accessory short-term rental. The cost of a conditional use review is currently $4, 130 dollars. There is no evidence in the record to support the assumption that by removing the requirement for a conditional use review, rental rates will go up citywide. However, if rental rates were to increase commensurate with the decrease in cost for a conditional use review ($4, I 30), the amount a resident could generate from an accessory short-term rental ($6,860; Airbnb survey 2014) exceeds the increase in rent. Finally, the income generated by the accessory short-term rental may help reduce household expenses, including costs associated with rent or a mortgage, thereby helping to make the housing more affordable. 44. Policy 4.14 Neighborhood Stability, calls for neighborhood stability by promoting: 1) a variety of homeownership and rental housing options; 2) security of housing tenure; and 3) opportunities for community interaction. As detailed in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development, Policy 2.15, Living Close to Work, Policy 2.21, Existing Housing Stock, Policy 3.2 Social Conditions, Policy 3.5, Neighborhood Involvement, and Goal 4, Housing, the amendments promote neighborhood stability by ensuring that the short-term rental use remains accessory to a primary household living use on a site, preventing the conversion of a dwelling in a residential zone to a full-time, shoti-term rental, requiring notification of the establishment of an accessory short-term rental to neighbors and local neighborhood and business associations, and allow the accessory short-term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the regulations of Title 33.207. Policy 4.14, Objective H calls for enabling people who are elderly to remain in their own neighborhoods as their needs change. These amendments support that objective because they remove a cost barrier to establishing a Type A accessory short-term rental. The reduced cost may allow elderly people to more easily enter into the accessory short-term rental market, and the income generated from the short-term rental may allow the elderly person to maintain their home and/or remain in their home. Testimony in the record asserts that the amendments conflict with this policy and its objectives because they will replace long-term rentals, make Neighborhood Watch programs ineffectual, and destroy a sense of safety. No evidence was provided to support these conclusions. As demonstrated above and in the findings for Title 12, Protection of Residential Neighborhoods, Policy 3 .2, Social Conditions, Policy 3.5, Neighborhood Involvement, Goal 4, Housing, Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, Policy 4.10, Housing Diversity, and Policy 4.11, Affordability, these amendments do not encourage the loss of long-term rentals, and they do facilitate communication between the operator of an accessory short-term rental and neighbors, and they protect residential neighborhoods. GOAL 5, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 45. Goal 5, Economic Development, calls for fostering a strong and diverse economy which provides a full range of employment and economic choices for individuals and families in all parts of the city. As described in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development, and Policy 2.15, Living Close to Work, the amendments arc consistent with this goal because they encourage expanded opportunity for homc- bascd jobs. An accessory short-term rental is where a long-term resident rents bedrooms in the dwelling in which they reside to overnight guest. An accessory short-term rental use is currently allowed in residential zones as a conditional use, and approval of an accessory short-term rental facility requires a quasi-judicial conditional use review. These amendments establish Type A (one or two bedrooms) and a Type B (three to five bedrooms) accessory short-term rental types, and eliminate the need for a conditional use review in order to establish a Type A facility in a house, IS of 20 18 s 7 6 attached house, accessory dwelling unit, duplex, or manufactured home on its own lot. A Type B facility will continue to require a conditional use review. Operating an accessory short-term rental is a home-based occupation, and the elimination of the $4, l30 conditional use review application fee (as of May 2014) will make entry into this type of work less costly, and therefore encourage this type of home-based job. According to a survey of accessory short-term rental host in Portland who use the Airbnb website, the average annual income generated from an accessory short-term rental is $6,860 (Airbnb survey 2014). GOAL 6, TRANSPORTATION 46. Goal 6, Transportation, calls for developing a balanced, equitable, and efficient transportation system that provides a range of transportation choices; reinforces the livability of neighborhoods; supports a strong and diverse economy; reduces air, noise, and water pollution; and lessens reliance on the automobile while maintaining accessibility. These amendments are consistent with this goal because they ensure that the potential number of trips generated by an accessory short-term rental will not exceed the number of trips that could be generated by a household living use without an accessory short-term rental. The amendments include a provision that limits the total number of guests and residents staying in a home with an accessory short-term rental to no more than the number of residents allowed to reside in a home without an accessory short-term rental. In addition, the amendments potentially reduce the number of trips that could be generated by an home with an accessory short-term rental because they prohibit the resident in a home with a Type A accessory short-term rental from also operating a Type B accessory home occupation. A Type B accessory home occupation is one in which the operator has one employee or up to eight customers per day. By prohibiting a Type B accessory home occupation, the potential number of trips to and from a home in a residential zone is reduced. Testimony at the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing raised concerns about parking associated with an accessory short-term rental. As already mentioned, an accessory short-term rental can have no more people staying in the home than can reside or stay in a home without an accessory short-term rental, therefore the number of cars being parked in association with a home that operates an accessory short-term rental will be no more than should be expected for a home without an accessory short-term rental. In addition, several operators of accessory short-term rentals who testified at the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing suggested that many of their guests do not have a car. One operator said that fewer than one-half of their guest have had a car, while another operator stated that more than 80 percent of their guests did not have a car. 4 7. Policy 6.12, Regional and City Travel Patterns, calls for supporting the use of the street system consistent with its state, regional, and city classifications and its classification descriptions. Objective B calls for minimizing the impacts of interregional and long intraregional trips on Portland neighborhood and commercial areas, while supporting the travel needs of the community. These amendments are consistent with this policy because, as stated in the findings for Goal 6, Transportation, they ensure that the number of trips generated by a home with an accessory shoti- term rental will be no more than, and could potentially be fewer than, the number of trips generated by home without an accessory short-term rental. 48. Policy 6.26, On-Street Parking Management, calls for managing the supply, operations, and demand for parking and loading in the public right-of-way to encourage economic vitality, safety for all modes, and livability of residential areas. As stated in the findings for Goal 6, Transpotiation, these amendments are consistent with this policy because they will not increase the demand for parking in residential areas, and will in some cases reduce the potential demand for parking in residential areas. l6 oC20 GOAL 8, ENVIRONMENT 49. Goal 8, Environment, calls for maintaining and improving the quality of Po1iland's air, water and land resources and protect neighborhoods and business centers from detrimental noise pollution. These amendments will limit potential impacts from noise because they include provisions intended to keep the activities occurring in association with an accessory short-term rental at the same level of activity expected from home without an accessory short-term rental. The amendments accomplish this by: ci Ensuring that the number of guests and residents staying in a home with an accessory short-term rental does not exceed the number of residents of a home without an accessory sho1i-term rental; "' Prohibiting establishment of a Type B accessory home occupation in a home with an accessory short-term rental. A Type B accessory home occupation can have up to eight customers arriving and leaving from the home each day; ci Prohibiting commercial meetings (including weddings and banquets) in a home with a Type A accessory short-term rental; and "' Allowing the accessory short-term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the requirements of Title 33.207. For these reasons, the amendments are consistent with this goal. GOAL 9, CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT 50. Goal 9, Citizen Involvement, calls for improving the methods for citizen involvement in the on- going land use decision-making process, and providing opportunities for citizen participation in the implementation, review, and amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 9.1 calls for encouraging citizen involvement in land use planning projects by actively coordinating the planning process with relevant community organizations, through the reasonable availability of planning reports to city residents and businesses, and notice of official public hearings to neighborhood associations, business groups, affected individuals and the general public. The preparation of these amendments provided multiple opportunities for citizen involvement, in accordance with the legislative procedure requirements of Title 33.740, Legislative Procedure. The development of these amendments included the following notifications and opportunities for citizen involvement: a) Staff from the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability met with the Development Review Advisory Committee (DRAC) on July 15, 2013, and with the land use chairs of the city's neighborhood coalition offices on July 25, 2013 to review potential items for inclusion in the Rf CAP 6 work plan. b) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RICAP 6): Proposed Workplan was made available to the public for review on July 24, 2013. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. c) The Planning and Sustainability Commission held a public hearing on the RICAP 6 proposed work plan on August 13, 2013. Notice of the August 13 hearing was mailed to all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, and other interested parties on July 25,2013. ! 7 of20 186736 d) The Regulatmy lmproventenl Code Amendment Package 6 (R!CAP 6): Discussion Dredi was made available to the public for review on January 6, 2014. The repoti was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website, and mailed to all who requested a copy. e) Notice of the RICAP 6 discussion draft was mailed January 8, 2014 to over 750 recipients, including neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, and other interested parties. The notice included the dates, times and locations of neighborhood association or neighborhood coalition meetings, and a BPS sponsored open house, during which project staff presented the draft for discussion and questions. f) Project staff attended six neighborhood coalition meetings, and two neighborhood association meetings between January 6, and February 2 l, 2014. The RI CAP 6 discussion draft report was presented and discussed at each of these meetings g) Project staff presented the RI CAP 6 discussion draft report at one Design Commission meeting, one Historic Landmarks Commission meeting, and one Planning & Sustainability Commission meeting( s ). h) Project staff were available to discuss the RI CAP 6 discussion draft at an open house held on February l l, 2014 from 5:00 pm to 7:30 pm. i) On March l 8, 20 l 4 notice of the proposed action was mailed to the Department of Land Conservation and Development in compliance with the post-acknowledgement review process required by OAR 660-018-0020 and ORS 197.610. j) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (R!CAP 6): Proposed Drcift was made available to the public for review on March 21, 2014. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. k) The Planning and Sustainability Commission held a public hearing on the RICAP 6 proposed draft on April 22, 2014. Notice of the hearing was mailed to the regional transit agency, Metro, the Oregon Department of Transportation, all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, affected bureaus, and other interested parties on March 20, 2014, as required by ORS 227.186 and PCC 33.740. The Planning and Sustainability Commission made four amendments to the proposed draft. 1) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (R!C/-1P 6): Recommended Draji was made available to the public for review on May 19, 2014. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. m) City Council held a public hearing on the RI CAP 6 recommended draft on June 4, 2014. Notice of the hearing was mailed to all those who testified orally or in writing at the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing, and to other persons who requested such notice, on May 13, 2014. The findings for Statewide Planning Goal 1, Citizen Involvement also demonstrate compliance with this goal and policy. Testimony in the record asserts that these amendments fail to satisfy this goal and policy. As described above, the process to adopt these amendments followed all requirements of Title 33.740, Legislative Procedures, therefore Goal 9 and Policy 9.1 are satisfied. ! 8 of ?0 186736 GOAL 10, PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION 5 I. Policy 10.10, Amendments to the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations, requires amendments to the zoning and subdivision regulations to be clear, concise, and applicable to the broad range of development situations faced by a growing urban city. Objective A calls for promoting good planning by effectively and efficiently implementing the Comprehensive Plan, addressing present and future land use problems, balancing the benefits of regulations against the cost of implementation and compliance, and assuring that Portland remains competitive with other jurisdictions as a location I n which to live, invest and do business. Tt)e amendments are consistent with this policy and its objectives for the following reasons: • They address a development situation that has been growing in Portland. The number of short- term rentals occurring in Portland has increased substantially. In May 2014, Bureau of Planning and Sustainability found over l,600 short-term rental listings on one website that facilitates peer- to-peer sho1i-term rentals, up from I 07 in January 2011; @ They address a present land use problem. Accessory short-term rentals arc currently allowed in residential zones in Po1iland as a conditional use. Twenty-four have been approved through a conditional use review since 2004 date. With only 24 having been approved, it is likely that the majority of short-term rentals operating in Portland have not received proper approvals. [n 2013, the Bureau of Development Service's Code Compliance unit received 38 complaints regarding unauthorized accessory short-term rentals--3 8 out of a total l 083 complaints. The number of short-term rental listings in Portland on one short-term rental website was over l ,600 in May 2014-a number that far exceeds the total number of complaints investigated by the staff of the Code Compliance unit. Therefore, the total number of accessory short-term rentals operating without approval in Portland presents a present land use problem that needs to be remedied; • They clarify and streamline regulations that have not been updated since 2004; and • They address the cost of implementation and compliance by eliminating the need for a conditional use review for a Type A accessory short-term rental. 19 oC 20 186736 NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs: a. Adopt items #12-14 (Short-Term Rental/Bed and Breakfast amendments) of Exhibit A, Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment package 6 (RJCAP 6): Recommended Draft, dated July 2014. b. Adopt the comrnenta1y for items #12-14 (Short-Term Rental/Bed and Breakfast amendments) in Exhibit A, Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment package 6 (RJCAP 6): Recommended Draft, dated July 2014 as legislative intent and further findings. c. Amend Title 33, Planning and Zoning, as shown in items #12-14 (Short-Tetm Rental/Bed and Breakfast amendments) in Exhibit A, Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment package 6 (RJCAP 6): Recommended Draft, dated July 2014. d. Amend Title 3, Administration, as shown in Exhibit A, Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment package 6 (RICAP 6): Recommended Draft, dated July 2014. e. Amend Title 6, Special Taxes, as shown in Exhibit A, Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment package 6 (RICAP 6): Recommended Draft, dated July 2014. f. Direct the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability to return to City Council with a proposal for accessory short-te1;m rentals in multi-dwelling structures within 90 days. g. Direct the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability to monitor the effects of the amendments as part of their overall monitoring program, and provide a repo1i on the effects to City Council by September, 2016. Section 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, diagram, designation, or drawing contained in this Ordinance, or the plan, map or code it adopts or amends, is held to be deficient, invalid or unconstitutional, that shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The Council declares that it would have adopted the plan, map, or code and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, diagram, designation, and drawing thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, diagrams, designations, or drawings contained in this Ordinance, may be found to be deficient, invalid or unconstitutional. Passed by the Council: JUL 80 2014 Mayor Charles Hales Prepared by: Shannon Buono Date Prepared: July 16, 2014 Page 20 of20 La Vonne Griffin-Valade ~~dito2:::f~ / ' __ , . Deputy 5 -~ 71-801 Agenda No. ORDINANCE NO. ·SUBSTITUTE .--·-is"s 7 a.s Title Improve land use regulations related to accessory short-term rentals through the Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6_(BJCAP-6)(0rdinance; ,Amend1Title 33, .Planning-antl-.zmrtn:g, Title ~ -Ad-m-iBist,i:atien\, and Title 6.,--0 !Jt:Cia.i..:r--axes) Code- INTRODUCED BY Commissioner/Auditor: Ma or Charlie Hales Ma or-Finance and Administratio Position 1 /Utilities -Fritz Position 2fWorks -Fish Position 3/Affairs -Saltzman Position 4/Safet -Novick Prepared by: Morgan Tracy Date Pre ared: Jul 17, 2014 Financial lmP.act & Publ ic Involvement Statement Completed cg) Amends Budget D Portland Policy Document If "Yes" requires City Policy paragraph stated in doc nt. Yes No City Auditor Office Approval: ~ re uired for Code Ordinances Y"."\) City Attorney Approval: ~~ required for contract, code, easement, franchise, com Ian, charter Council Meeting Date July 23, 2014 AGENDA TIME CERTAIN D Start time: -- Total amount of time needed: --(for presentation, testimony and discussion) CONSENT D REGULAR cg) Total amount of time needed: 30 mins (for presentation, testimony and discussion) CLERK USE: DATE FILED JUL 1 7 2014 ACTION TAKEN: Lavonne Griffin-Valade Auditor of the City of Portland JUL 2· 3 2014 S v b 5 fti-U---r-\': PASSED TO SECOND READING JUL 3 0 2014 9:30 A.I. FOUR-FIFTHS AGENDA COMMISSIONERS VOTED AS FOLLOWS: YEAS NAYS 1. Fritz 1. Fritz J 2. Fish 2. Fish 3. Saltzman 3. Saltzman ~ 4. Novick 4. Novick J Hales Hales ./ ORDINANCE No. Amend accessory short-tenn rentals regulations to allow multi-dwelling structures, multi-dwelling development, triplexes, attached duplexes, manufactured dwellings and houseboats; establish fee for accessory short-term rental permits in multi-dwelling structures (Ordinance; amend Title 33) The City of Portland Ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: General Findings 1. This ordinance is part of the Regulatory Improvement W orkplan, an ongoing program to improve City building and land use regulations and procedures. Each package of amendments is referred to as RICAP (Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package) followed by a number. This ordinance pertains to the Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RICAP 6) amendments addressing accessory short-term rentals. 2. During the spring and summer of 2013, staff from the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability (BPS) and the Bureau of Development Services (BDS) worked together to develop a draft work plan for RICAP 6. Potential code amendments were drawn from a database that contains regulatory improvement requests. 3. On August 13, 2013, the Planning and Sustainability Commission held a public hearing and adopted the work plan for (RI CAP 6). Notice of the August 13 hearing was sent to all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, and business associations in the city of Portland, as well as other interested parties on July 25, 2013. The accessory short-term rental items were grouped together in the work plan and identified as items 12-14. 4. During the summer and fall of2013, BPS staff conducted research, met with neighborhood land use chairs, and worked with BDS staff and staff from other City agencies to develop a proposal for the accessory short-term rental items. 5. The Planning and Sustainability Co1mnission and the City Council held public hearings on the RICAP 6 proposals. At these hearings there was testimony both in favor of and against allowing accessory short-term rentals in multi-dwelling structures. 6. On July 30, 2014 City Council approved the accessory sholi-term rental regulations of the RICAP 6 which created a Type A accessory short-term rental permit that allows residents in houses, attached houses, manufactured homes on their own lot, duplexes and accessory dwelling units to rent up to two bedrooms to overnight guests on a short-term basis (less than 30 days at a time). Type B accessory short-term rentals that rent 3-5 bedrooms to overnight guests continue to require a conditional use review. 7. The implementing ordinance for the RICAP 6 access01y short-term rental regulations (Ordinance No. 186736) directs the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability to return to City Council with a proposal for accessory short-term rentals in multi-dwelling structures within 90 days. Page I of 13 8. Mayor Hales's staff formed a stakeholder working group, conducted tlu·ee working group meetings, and worked with staff from Bureau of Development Services and Bureau of Planning and Sustainability to develop regulations for accessory short-term rentals in multi-dwelling structures. 9. On October 15, 2014 notice of proposed action was mailed to Department of Land conservation and Development in compliance with the post-acknowledgement review process required by OAR 660- 018-0020 and ORS 197.610. This was a revision to a previously submitted notice (RICAP 6) submitted on 03/18/2014, which addressed many different proposed zoning code amendments in addition to amendments allowing short-term rentals. 10. The Accessory Short-Term Rentals in Multi-Dwelling Structures-Mayor's Recommended Draft, was available to the public on October 20, 2014. Notice of the November 19, 2014 City Council hearing on the Mayor's recommendation was mailed to the persons and entities identified in PCC 33.740.020.B.l, all persons who presented testimony orally or in writing to the Planning and Sustainability Commission or City Council and provided a name and address, those who asked for notice, and other interested patties on October 21, 2014. 11. The Bureau of Development Services enforcement program has determined that a fee of $100 will cover the actual cost of processing an administrative permit for a Type A accessory short-term rental in a multi-dwelling structure. Findings on Statewide Planning Goals 12. State planning statutes require cities to adopt and amend comprehensive plans and land use regulations in compliance with state land use goals. Only the stated goals addressed below apply. 13. Goal 1, Citizen Involvement, requires provision of opportunities for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The preparation of these amendments has provided several opportunities for public involvement. The amendments are supportive of this goal for the following reasons: a) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RICAP 6): Proposed Workplan which included a minor policy bundle of accessory short-term rental items was made available to the public for review on July 24, 2013. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. b) The Planning and Sustainability Commission held a public hearing on the RI CAP 6 proposed work plan on August 13, 2013. Notice of the hearing was mailed to all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, and other interested parties on July 25, 2013. c) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Package 6 (RICAP 6): Discussion Draft was made available to the public for review on January 6, 2014. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website, and mailed to all who requested a copy. d) Notice of the RICAP 6 discussion draft was also mailed on January 8, 2014 to over 750 recipients, including neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, and other interested parties. The notice included the dates, times and locations of neighborhood association or neighborhood coalition meetings, and a BPS sponsored open house, during which project staff presented the draft for discussions and questions. Page 2of13 e) Project staff attended six neighborhood coalition meetings, and two neighborhood association meetings between January 6, and February 21, 2014. The RIC AP 6 discussion draft report was presented and discussed at each of these meetings. In every meeting attended the majority of the interest and discussion focused on the accessory short-term rental proposals. f) Project staff held an open house on February 11, 2014 to discuss the RICAP 6 Discussion Draft from 5:00 pm to 7:30 pm. The first hour included a staff presentation followed by discussion about the accessory short-term rental proposals. Because of the interest in these proposals the entire open house was dedicated to the short-term rental proposals. g) On March 18, 2014 notice of the proposed action was mailed to the Depariment of Land Conservation and Development in compliance with the post-acknowledgement review process required by OAR 660-018-0020 and ORS 197.610. h) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Pack.age 6 (RICAP 6): Proposed Drqft was made available to the public for review on March 21, 2014. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. i) The Planning and Sustainability Commission held a public hearing on the RICAP 6 proposed draft on April 22, 2014. Notice of the hearing was mailed to the regional transit agency, Metro, the Oregon Department of Transportation, all neighborhood associations, neighborhood coalitions, business associations, affected bureaus, and other interested parties on March 20, 2014, as required by ORS 227.186 and PCC 33.740. j) The Regulatory Improvement Code Amendment Pack.age 6 (RIC'AP 6): Recommended Drqfi was made available to the public for review on May 19, 2014. The report was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. k) City Council held a public hearing on the RI CAP 6 recommended draft on June 4, 2014. Notice of the hearing was mailed on May 13, 2014 to all who testified orally or in writing at the Planning and Sustainability Cmmnission hearing, and to other persons who requested such notice. 1) In addition to the June 4, 2014 public hearing on all RICAP 6 items, City Council review of the accessory short-term rentals regulations included a work session on June 24, and subsequent public hearings on July 2 and July 23, 2014. m) At the June 23, 2014 hearing Mayor Hales directed staff to look at options for including short- term rentals in multi-dwelling structures and return to Council before the end of the year with a proposal. This direction was included in the Ordinance adopting the rest of RICAP 6. n) On October 15, 2014 a revised notice of the RI CAP 6 proposed action was mailed to Department of Land conservation and Development in compliance with the post-acknowledgement review process required by OAR 660-018-0020 and ORS 197 .610. o) The Accessmy Short-Term Rentals in Multi-Dwelling Structures---Mayor 's Recommended Drafi, was available to the public on October 20, 2014. T'he repo1i was posted on the City's regulatory improvement program website and mailed to all who requested a copy. p) Notice of the November 19, 2014 City Council hearing on the Mayor's recommendation was mailed to the persons and entities identified in PCC 33.740.020.B.1, all persons who presented testimony orally or in writing to the Planning and Sustainability Commission or City Council and Page 3of13 186 provided a name and address, those who asked for notice, and other interested parties on October 21, 2014. 14. Goal 2, Land Use Planning, requires the development of a process and policy framework that acts as a basis for all land use decisions and assures that decisions and actions are based on an understanding of the facts relevant to the decision. The process for identifying and adopting the amendments supports this goal for the following reasons: • The process followed all procedures required by Title 33.740, Legislative Procedures, OAR 660- 018-0020, ORS 227.186 and ORS 197.610; • The amendments meets relevant goals and policies of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan as described in the findings for Portland's Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies; • The amendments are based on relevant facts in the record including an estimate of the number of accessory short-term rentals in multi-dwelling structures being operated in the city; a survey of accessory short-term rental operators in Portland conducted by Airbnb; a review of relevant City and State regulations pertaining to lodgings and lodging taxation; and testimony in the record. See also findings addressing Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 1, Metropolitan Coordination. 15. Goal 9, Economic Development, requires provision of adequate opportunities for a variety of economic activities vital to public health, welfare, and prosperity. These amendments are consistent with this goal by allowing accessory short-term rentals in additional residential structure types, thereby expanding the opportunity to use additional types of dwelling units for economic activity. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 5, Economic Development also demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with this goal. 16. Goal 10, Housing, requires provision for the housing needs of citizens of the state. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 4, Housing, and relevant sub-policies and objectives, demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with Goal 10. 17. Goal 12, Transportation, requires provision of a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 6, Transportation, and relevant sub- policies demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with Goal 12. 1 8. The Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) was adopted in 1991 and amended in 1996, 2005 and 2012 to implement State Cioal J 2. The TPR requires certain findings if a proposed Comprehensive Plan Map amendment, zone change, or regulation will significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility. These amendments will not have a significant effect on existing or planned transportation facilities because, as demonstrated in the findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 6 and related sub- policies, the amendments ensure that the number of trips generated by a household living use with an accessory short-term rental use will not exceed the number of trips generated by a household living use without an accessory short-term rental. 19. Goal 14, Urbanization, requires provision of an orderly and efficient transition of rural lands to urban use, the efficient use of land, and the provision of livable communities. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 2, Urban Development, Goal 3, Neighborhoods, and their relevant sub-policies demonstrates that these amendments provide for livable communities and are therefore consistent with this goal. Page 4of13 Findings on Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan 20. The following elements of the Metro Urban Growth Management Functional Plan are relevant and applicable to these accessory short-term rental amendments. 21. Title 1, Housing Capacity, requires cities and or counties to maintain or increase its housing capacity. This requirement is to be generally implemented through city-wide analysis based on calculated capacities from land use designations. These amendments will not affect housing capacity. The amendments allow accessory short-term rentals in additional housing types, and by definition, an accessory short-term rental is an accessory use to a primary household living use on a site. Because there must continue to be a household living use on the site with an accessory sho1i-term rental, these amendments do not allow conversion of a housing unit in a residenti.al zone to a motel or other commercial use. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 4, Housing, and relevant sub- policies also demonstrate that these amendments are consistent with this title. 22. Title 4, Industrial and other Employment Areas, seeks to provide and proteet a supply of sites for employment by limiting the types and scale of non-industrial uses in Regionally Significant Industrial Areas (RSIAs), Industrial and Employment Areas. Title 4 also seeks to provide the benefits of "clustering" to those industries that operate more productively and efficiently in proximity to one another than in dispersed locations. These amendments do not increase the type or scale of non- industrial uses allowed in RSIAs, Industrial or General Employment zones for the reasons stated below: • The amendments do not allow establishment of a primary household living use in the Industrial or Employment zones. The amendments expand the type of dwelling unit that can have an accessory short-term rental. However, in the fndustrial and Employments zones, an accessory short-term rental will only be allowed in situations where the dwelling also has a legally established, non- conforming primary household living use. The accessory short-term rental regulations also contain provisions that limit the scale of the non-industrial activity including a limit on the total number of guests and residents occupying a dwelling unit with an accessory short-term rental, a limit on the number of bedrooms that can be rented to overnight guests, and in the case of a multi- dwelling structure, a cap on the number of accessory short-term rentals allowed in the building; • A short-term rental (temporary lodging) can also be considered a Retail Sales and Service use, and Retail Sales and Service uses are currently allowed outright in an Industrial or General Employment zone. Up to one Retail Sales and Service use, with maximum of 3,000 square feet, is allowed in an IG 1 zone, up to four Retail Sales and Service uses, with a maximum of 3,000 square feet each, are allowed in the !G2 and lH zones, and up to 60,000 square feet of Retail Sales and Service use, or up to an FAR of l : 1, is allowed in the EG zones. For these reasons, the amendments do not conflict with Title 4. The findings addressing Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 6, Transportation, also demonstrate that the amendments do not conflict with Title 4. Page 5 of 13 if:' tJ 23. Title 7, Housing Choice, ensures opportunities for affordable housing at all income levels, and calls for a choice of housing types. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 4, Housing, Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, Policy 4.8, Regional Housing Opportunities, Policy 4.9, Fair Housing, and 4.11, Affordable Housing demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with this title. 24. Title 12, Protection of Residential Neighborhoods, calls for protecting the region's existing residential neighborhoods from air and water pollution, noise and crime, and providing adequate levels of public services. The findings for Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 8, Environment demonstrate that the amendments will limit potential impacts from noise. Findings on Portland's Comprehensive Plan Goals 25. The following goals, policies, and objectives of the Portland Comprehensive Plan are relevant and applicable to these accessory short-term rentals amendments. GOAL 1, METROPOLITAN COORDINATION 26. Goal 1, Metropolitan Coordination, calls for the Comprehensive Plan to be coordinated with federal and state law and to support regional goals, objectives and plans. The amendments are consistent with this goal because notification of the proposal, and an opportunity to provide comment at a public hearing before the Portland Planning and Sustainability Commission, was provided to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development per ORS 197 .610, and to Metro, Tri- Met, and the Oregon Department ofTranspotiation per 33.740.020. In addition, nothing within these amendments changes or affects the Urban Growth Boundary, Urban Planning Area Boundary, or Urban Services Boundary. GOAL 2, URBAN DEVELOPMENT 27. Goal 2, Urban Development calls for maintaining Portland's role as the major regional employment and population center through public policies that encourage expanded opportunity for housing and jobs, while retaining the character of established residential neighborhoods and business centers. The amendments are consistent with this goal because they expand oppo1iunities for home-based jobs, without detracting from the character of existing residential neighborhoods. An accessory short-term rental is a type of home-based job. Accessory short-term rentals are currently not allowed in multi- dwclling structures, multi-dwelling development, triplexes, attached duplexes, manufactured dwellings, and houseboats. These amendments expand the list of housing types in which an accessory sho1i-term rental can be established to all residential structure types. The change will provide residents in the additional housing types the opportunity to have this type of home-based business. The additional home-based jobs will not detract from the character of existing residential neighborhoods because the adopted accessory short-term rental regulations include provisions that address several common clements of neighborhood character including use, intensity, and accessory home occupations: e Use. The accessory short-term rental regulations do not allow a home in a neighborhood to be converted to a full-time, short-term rental. The existing regulations ensure that the accessory short-term rental remains an accessory use to a primary household living use on a site. This is accomplished by requiring that a long-term resident live in the dwelling unit in which the rooms wi II be rented; Page 6or13 © Intensity. The accessory short-term rental regulations limit a Type A accessory short-term rental to offering no more than two bedrooms to overnight guests, and require a conditional use review, which includes notice and a public hearing, for facilities that rent more than two bedrooms per night;. • Intensity. The accessory short-term rental regulations limit the total number of guests and residents occupying a dwelling with an accessory short-term rental to no more than the number allowed for a household (per 33.910.030; one or more persons related by blood, marriage, legal adoption, guardianship, or domestic partnership plus not more than 5 other persons). This provision ensures that the number of residents and guests coming and going from the home with bedrooms rented on a short-term basis does not exceed the number of residents allowed to come and go from other homes in the neighborhood without an accessory short-term rental; © Accessory home occupation. The accessory short-term rental regulations prohibit the establishment of a Type B accessory home occupation in a dwelling unit with an accessory shoti- term rental, and prohibiting non-resident employees and commercial meetings in a Type A accessory short-term rental. A Type B accessory home occupation is one in which the resident uses their home as place of work, and has one employee or up to eight customers per day. This provision is intended to limit potential impacts that additional trips to and from a dwelling with an accessory short-term rental may have on the surrounding neighborhood; o Finally, the existing accessory short-term rental regulations allow the Type A accessory short- term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the regulations of 33 .207. In additional to the adopted regulations, the amendments also limit the number of accessory short- term rentals in a multi-dwelling structures to ensure the character of the building and the surrounding area remains residential. 28. Policy 2.9, Residential Neighborhoods, calls for allowing for a range of housing types to accommodate increased population growth while improving and protecting the city's residential neighborhoods. The amendments are consistent with this policy because they include provisions that protect the integrity of the city's residential neighborhoods as described in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development. 29. Policy 2.14, Industrial Sanctuaries, calls for providing industrial sanctuaries and encouraging the growth of industrial activities by preserving industrial land primarily for manufacturing purposes. The findings for Title 4 also demonstrate that the amendments are consistent with this policy. 30. Policy 2.15, Living Closer to Work, calls for locating greater residential densities near major employment centers, locating affordable housing close to employment centers, and encouraging home-based work where the nature of the work is not disruptive to the neighborhood. As described in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development, the amendments encourage home-based jobs, and the existing accessory short-term rental regulations include provisions that protect neighborhoods. GOAL 3, NEIGHBORHOODS 31. Goal 3, Neighborhoods, calls for preserving and reinforcing the stability and diversity of the city's neighborhoods while allowing for increased density in order to attract and retain long-term residents and businesses and insure the city's residential quality and economic vitality. The amendments are consistent with this goal and preserve the stability of the city's neighborhoods for the reasons stated in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development, the Goal 2 sub-policies, and the findings below. Page 7 of J 3 32. Policy 3.2, Social Conditions, call for providing and coordinating programs to promote neighborhood interest, concern and security and to minimize the social impact of land use decisions. The amendments promote neighborhood interest and concern because they require the resident to notify neighbors before the accessory short-term rental is approved. The notification must include a description of the operation and the number of rooms to be rented to overnight guests. The notification must also include contact information for the operator and describe how the standards of the Title 33.207 will be met. This notification must be updated every two years. The amendments also address neighborhood concern and security because Title 3 .30.040.B.5 allows the Type A accessory short-term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the regulations of Title 33.207. If the permit is revoked, a new permit will not be issued to the operator at that residence for two years. 33. Policy 3.5, Neighborhood Involvement, provides for the active involvement of neighborhood residents and businesses in decisions a1Tecting their neighborhood, and calls for providing information to neighborhood and business associations which allows them to monitor the impacts of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendments support this policy because they require that neighborhood associations and business associations be notified when an accessory short-term rental is established within their boundaries. The notification will provide the associations with contact information for the operator, a description of the operation and the number of rooms to be rented to overnight guests, and a description of how the operation meets the other standards of Title 33.207. GOAL 4, HOUSING 34. Goal 4, Housing, calls for enhancing Po1iland's vitality as a community at the center of the region's housing market by providing housing of different types, density, sizes, costs and locations that accommodates the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of current and future households. The amendments are consistent with this policy because the existing regulations that will apply to an accessory short-term rentals include provisions aimed at preserving housing, and they accommodate the needs and preforences of current households. The regulations preserve housing by prohibiting the conversion of an entire dwelling unit in a residential zone to a motel or other commercial use. In all cases, an accessory short-term rental must be an accessory use to a primary household living use on a site. The regulations: • Require that a long-term resident live in the dwelling unit in which the rooms will be rented; co Require that the dwelling unit be the long-term resident's primary residence; 0 Limit the number of bedrooms being rented to overnight guests to not more than two, and require a conditional use review for facilities that rent more than two bedrooms per night. The regulations also accommodate the needs and preference of current households as expressed by people who provided testimony on the accessory short-term rental amendments to the Planning and Sustainability Commission. The Planning and Sustainability Commission received testimony from 36 people who rent bedrooms in their homes to overnight guests. Many of the 36 testified that renting a room to guests has allowed them to increase their income, and 14 of the 36 testified that the additional income has allowed them to stay in their homes. 35. Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, calls for retaining housing potential by requiring no net loss of land reserved for, or committed to, residential, or mixed-use. This policy is implemented by an approval criterion applied to quasi-judicial Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments that requires no net loss of potential housing units when a requested amendment is from a residential or the urban commercial Comprehensive Plan Map designation to a non-residential map designation (33 .810.050.A.2). These amendments do not conflict with this policy because they do not amend, change, or undermine the approval criterion. Page 8of13 36. Policy 4.4 Housing Safety, calls for ensuring a safe and healthy built environment and assisting in the preservation of sound existing housing and the improvement of neighborhoods. These amendments support this policy because they require the operator of a Type A accessory short-term rental to verify that each floor on which a room with be rented has at least one carbon monoxide alarm, and each bedroom has a smoke detector that is interconnected with smoke detectors in an adjacent hallway. These requirements are intended to ensure that guests can exit the dwelling rapidly and safely in the event of a fire or other emergency. These amendments also prohibit accessory short- terrn rentals in dwelling units in Chapter 13 buildings without approved sprinkler systems. 3 7. Policy 4.8, Regional Housing Opportunities, ensures opportunities for economic and racial integration throughout the region by advocating for the development of a range of housing options affordable to all income levels throughout the region. Policy 4.8, Objective A calls for advocating for a regional "fair share" strategy for meeting the housing needs of low, moderate, and higher-income households and people in protected classes in cities and counties throughout the region, and Policy 4.8 Objective B calls for supporting regulations and incentives that encourage the production and preservation of housing that is affordable throughout the region. As stated in the findings for Goal 4, lfousing, and Policy 4.2, Maintain Housing Potential, these amendments will not encourage the loss of long-term rentals because they do not allow the conversion of housing units in residential zones from a primary residential use to a primary commercial use. 3 8. Policy 4.9, Fair Housing, calls for freedom of choice in housing type, tenure, and neighborhood for all, regardless of race, color, age, gender, familial status, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, source of income or disability. City Code Title 23.01 and Oregon Revised Statute 659A.403 prohibit discrimination based on race, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, marital status, familial status, age if over 18, or disability in places of public accommodation, such as lodgings, and in the selling, leasing or renting ofreal property. This ordinance does not reduce or nullify in any way the prohibition of discrimination contained in City Code Title 23.0 l or ORS 659A. 39. Policy 4.11 Affordability, promotes the development and preservation of quality housing that is affordable across the full spectrum of household incomes. The amendments are consistent with this policy because allowing accessory short-term rentals will not affect the supply of needed affordable housing for the following reasons: @ The accessory short-term rental regulations do not allow conversions of needed housing in residential zones from a residential use to a commercial use. The regulations ensure that the primary use of the dwelling unit remains household living. The regulations allow a long-term resident to rent unused bedrooms within their primary residence to overnight guests, and the regulations limit the number of bedrooms that can be rented on a short-term basis. @ Allowing accessory short-term rentals in additional residential structure types will increase the number of householders eligible to establish an accessory short-term rental. Testimony in the record asserts that the ability to receive income from overnight guests may increase the ability of long-term residents to afford the cost of maintaining their homes or remain in their home during times of financial struggle. e Home Forward (formerly Housing Authority of Portland) is a government agency that owns homes and makes them available to rent by households earning less than sixty-percent of median metropolitan statistical area income. Rental agreements for these homes always contain a prohibition on subleliing that will prohibit accessory short-term rentals. The amendments will therefore not affect the affordability of this publically owned housing. In addition, they will not Page 9 of 1.3 affoct affordable housing obtained through the Housing Choice Voucher Program funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and administered by Home Forward. This program is commonly referred to as Section 8, and it provides rent assistance to low-income residents. The assistance voucher can be used for renting an apartment or a house, but it cannot be used to rent a room in a an apartment or a house, therefore converting a bedroom in a home to an accessory short-term rental is not removing a Section 8 housing unit from the aff()rdable housing market. 40. Policy 4.14 Neighborhood Stability, calls for neighborhood stability by promoting: 1) a variety of homeownership and rental housing options; 2) security of housing tenure; and 3) opportunities for community interaction. As detailed in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development, Policy 2.15, Living Close to Work, Policy 3.2 Social Conditions, Policy 3.5, Neighborhood Involvement, and Goal 4, Housing, the amendments promote neighborhood stability by ensuring that the short-term rental use remains accessory to a primary household living use, preventing the conversion of a dwelling in a residential zone to a full-time, short-term rental, requiring notification of the establishment of an accessory short-term rental to neighboring dwelling units and local neighborhood and business associations, and allow the accessory short-term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the regulations of Title 33.207. GOAL 5, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 41. Goal 5, Economic Development, calls for fostering a strong and diverse economy which provides a full range of employment and economic choices for individuals and families in all paiis of the city. As described in the findings for Goal 2, Urban Development, and Policy 2.15, Living Close to Work, the amendments are consistent with this goal because they encourage expanded opportunity for home- based jobs. An accessory short-term rental, where a long-term resident rents bedrooms in the dwelling in which they reside to overnight guests, is a home-based job. Currently, accessory short-term rentals are not allowed in multi-dwelling structures, multi-dwelling developrnent, triplexes, attached duplexes, manufactured dwellings, and houseboats. The amendments allow residents in these structure types the opportunity to have this type of home-based job. According to a survey of accessory short-term rental host in Portland who use the Airbnb website, the average annual income generated from an accessory short-term rental is $6,860 (Airbnb survey 2014 ). GOAL 6, TRANSPORTATION 42. Goal 6, Transportation, calls for developing a balanced, equitable, and efficient transportation system that provides a range of transportation choices; reinforces the livability of neighborhoods; supports a strong and diverse economy; reduces air, noise, and water pollution; and lessens reliance on the automobile while maintaining accessibility. The amendments are consistent with this goal because the existing regulations that will apply to an accessory short-term rental ensure that the potential number of trips generated by an household with an accessory short-term rental will not exceed the number of trips that could be generated by a household without an accessory short-term rental because: 0 The regulations include a provision that lirnits the total number of guests and residents staying in a home with an accessory short-term rental to no more than the number of residents allowed to reside in a home without an accessory short-term rental. Pagel 0 of 13 • The regulations further limit the number of trips that could be generated by an home with an accessory short-term rental because they prohibit the resident in a home with a Type A accessory sho1i-term rental from also operating a Type B accessory home occupation. A Type B accessory home occupation is one in which the operator has one employee or up to eight customers per day. By prohibiting a Type B accessory home occupation, the potential number of trips to and from a home in a residential zone is reduced. • The recommended amendments cap the number of dwelling units in a multi-dwelling structure or triplex that can have an accessory short-term rental. The cap will also limit the potential for additional trips to and from an accessory short-term rental in a multi-dwelling structure. In addition, testimony in the record suggest that many guests in a home with an accessory sho1i term rental do not have a car. One operator who testified at the Planning and Sustainability Commission hearing said that fewer than one-half of their guests have had a car, and another operator testified that more than 80 percent of their guests did not have a car. 43. Policy 6.12, Regional and City Travel Patterns, calls for supporting the use of the street system consistent with its state, regional, and city classifications and its classification descriptions. Objective B calls for minimizing the impacts of interregional and long intraregional trips on Portland neighborhood and commercial areas, while supporting the travel needs of the community. These amendments are consistent with this policy because, as stated in the findings for Goal 6, Transportation, they ensure that the number of trips generated by a dwelling unit with an accessory short-term rental will be no more than, and could potentially be fewer than, the number of trips generated by dwelling unit without an accessory sho1i-term rental. 44. Policy 6.26, On-Street Parking Management, calls for managing the supply, operations, and demand for parking and loading in the public right-of-way to encourage economic vitality, safety for all modes, and livability of residential areas. As stated in the findings for Goal 6, Transportation, these amendments are consistent with this policy because they will not increase the demand for parking in residential areas, and will in some cases reduce the potential demand for parking in residential areas. GOAL 8, ENVIRONMENT 45. Goal 8, Environment, calls for maintaining and improving the quality of Portland's air, water and land resources and protect neighborhoods and business centers from detrimental noise pollution. These amendments will limit potential impacts from noise because the amendments and the accessory short-term rental regulations include provisions intended to keep the activities occurring in association with the accessory use at the same level of activity expected from home without an accessory short-term rental. The amendment sand regulations accomplish this by: • Ensuring that the number of guests and residents staying in a home with an accessory short-term rental does not exceed the number of residents of a home without an accessory short-term rental; • Prohibiting establishment of a Type B accessory home occupation in a home with an accessory short-term rental. A Type B accessory home occupation can have up to eight customers arriving and leaving from the home each day; • Limiting the number of dwelling units in a multi-dwelling structure or triplex that can have an accessory short-term rental; and • Allowing the accessory short-term rental permit to be revoked for failure to comply with the requirements of Title 33.207. For these reasons, the amendments are consistent with this goal. Page I I of 13 GOAL 9, CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT 46. Goal 9, Citizen Involvement, calls for improving the methods for citizen involvement in the on- going land use decision-making process, and providing opportunities for citizen participation in the implementation, review, and amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 9. l calls for encouraging citizen involvement in land use planning projects by actively coordinating the planning process with relevant community organizations, through the reasonable availability of planning reports to city residents and businesses, and notice of official public hearings to neighborhood associations, business groups, affected individuals and the general public. The preparation of these amendments provided multiple opportunities for citizen involvement, in accordance with the legislative procedure requirements of Title 33.740, Legislative Procedure. The amendments support this goal for the reasons found in the findings for Statewide Planning Goal 1, Citizen Jnvolvement. GOAL 10,PLAN REVIEW AND IMPLEMENTATION 47. Policy 10.10, Amendments to the Zoning and Subdivision Regulations, requires amendments to the zoning and subdivision regulations to be clear, concise, and applicable to the broad range of development situations faced by a growing urban city. Objective A calls for promoting good planning by effectively and efficiently implementing the Comprehensive Plan, addressing present and future land use problems, balancing the benefits ofregulations against the cost of implementation and compliance, and assuring that Portland remains competitive with other jurisdictions as a location in which to live, invest and do business. The amendments are consistent with this policy and its objectives for the following reasons: • They address a development situation that has been growing in Portland. The number of short- term rentals occurring in Portland has increased substantially. In May 2014, Bureau of Planning and Sustainability found over 1,600 short-term rental listings on one website that facilitates peer- to-peer short-term rentals, up from l 07 in January 2011. In October, 2014 the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability found that 579 of the 1,600 short-term rental listings were for dwelling units in multi-dwelling structures; e They address a present land use problem. Accessory short-term rentals are prohibited in multi- dwelling structures. Therefore, the 579 short-term rental listings for dwelling units in rnulti- dwelling structures are operating without approval and this presents a present land use problem that needs to be remedied; and • They clarity and streamline regulations that have not been updated since 2004. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs: a. Adopt Exhibit A, Accessory Short-Term Rentals in Multi-Dwelling Structures -Mayor's Recommended Draft, dated October 20, 2014; b. Amend Title 33, Planning and Zoning, as shown in Exhibit A, Accessory Short-Term Rentals in Multi-Dwelling Structures---Mayor 's Recommended Drqft, dated October 20, 2014; c. Adopt the commentary in Exhibit A, Accessory Short-Term Rentals in lVfulti-Dwelling Structures---A1ayor 's Recommended Draft, dated October 20, 2014 as legislative intent and further findings; Page 12of13 1 1 d. Direct the Bureau of Planning and Sustainability to monitor the effects of the amendments as part ·of their overall monitoring program, and provide a report on the effects to City Council by January 201 7; and e. Amend Bureau of Development Services Enforcement Fee and Penalty Schedule as shown in ExhibitB. Section 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, diagram, designation, or drawing contained in this Ordinance, or the plan, map or code it adopts or amends, is held to be deficient, invalid or unconstitutional, that shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions. The Council declares that it would have adopted the plan, map, or code and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, diagram, designation, and drawing thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, diagrams, designations, or drawings contained in this Ordinance, may be found to be deficient, invalid or unconstitutional. Passed by the Council: Jt\N 4 2015 Mayor Charles Hales Prepared by: Julia Gisler Date Prepared: October 27, 2014 Page 13of13 Mary Hull Caballero Aupitor of the City of Portland By Deputy ~~~·,~-s~ Agenda No. G 9 ORDINANCE NO. 1 8 7 6 As Amended Title Amend accessory short-term rentals regulations to allow multi-dwelling structures, multi-dwelling development, triplexes, attached duplexes, manufactured dwellings/and houseboats; establish fee / for accessory short-term rental permits in multi-dwelling structures (Ordinance;~mend Title 33) ~.i.OQ=a.118=-Z0AtFtgT'f1fld-BtlfeaEFef-Qeve.IQ~f'.T-ler-1.t::SePJ-1ce.s rr .r:eem -nt-Feeo-aRrl-Pefl'a+ty INTRODUCED BY Commissioner/ Auditor: Ma or Charlie Hales COMMISSIONER APPROVAL Ma or-Finance and Administration -Hale Position 1/Utilities -Fritz Position 2fWorks -Fish Position 3/Affairs -Saltzman Position 4/Safet -Novick CLERK USE : DATE FILED NOV l 4 2014 By: ACTION TAKEN: Lavonne Griffin-Valade Auditor of the City of Portland 11------0-u_RE_Au_A_PP_Ro_vA_L __ --11 NOV 1 9 2014 PASSED ro SECOND REAofl~~drk 2014 9:30 A.M. Bureau.: Planning and Sustainability Bu au Head: Susan nder Prepared by: Julia Gisler Date Pre ared: October 30, 2014 Financial lmP.act & Public Involvement Statement oEc fs 2014 PASSED To sEcoND READING Completed ~ Amends Budget D Portland Policy Document If "Yes" requires City Policy paragraph stated in doc nt. Yes No X City Auditor Office Approval: re uired for Code Ordinances , City Attorney Approval: v required for contract, code, easeme t, franchise, com Ian, cha rter l?S Council Meeting Date November 19,2014 AGENDA TIME CERTAIN ~ Start time: !).. : oo p-l'V'\ Total amount of time needed: I· 5 ho1..v·5 (for presentation, testimony and discussion) CONSENT0 DC~I II An "71 ... IC:J Total amount of time needed: 1.5 hrs. (for presentation, testimony and discussion) JAN 14 2015 10:45 AM TIME CERTAIN FOUR-FIFTHS AGENDA COMMISSIONERS VOTED . AS FOLLOWS: YEAS 1. Fritz .. 1. Fritz J 2. Fish 2. Fish 3. Saltzman 3. Saltzman ../ 4. Novick 4. Novick v Hales Hales .J NAYS -../ Amend Transient Lodgings Tax to add definitions and clarify duties for Operators of short-term rental locations (Ordinance; amend Code Chapter 6.04) The City of Portland Ordains: Section 1. Council finds: 1. The City has made amendments to the Additional Use & Development Regulations in Title 33 of the Portland City Code to allow certain short-term rentals in residentially-zoned areas. 2. The City is aware that even with these amendments, there are many short-term rentals that are still out of compliance with registration and/or permitting requirements. Many Short-Term Rental Hosts ("Hosts") have not registered with the Revenue Division and are not collecting and/or remitting the appropriate transient lodging or business license (income) taxes. Many Short-Term Rental Hosts have not registered with the Bureau of Development Services and have not received the required code compliance review or paid the required permit fee. 3. The City has determined that finding these non-compliant Hosts and properties is difficult as they are often rented or "booked" through online agents ("Booking Agents") that refuse to provide the short-term rental location address or contact information of the Host, or to remit transient lodging taxes on behalf of the Hosts. Booking Agents include but are not limited to online travel booking sites with booking models that often obscure exact property locations and Hosts, making tax and code enforcement difficult. 4. The City believes that compelling Booking Agents to provide Host information will raise compliance, permit fees and transient lodging tax revenue. It will also prevent non-compliant operators from obtaining an unfair advantage over compliant operators. 5. The City believes that, to the extent Booking Agents are booking rooms and accepting payments on behalf of their Hosts, they should also collect and remit the City transient lodging tax on behalf of their Hosts. 6. The Revenue Division anticipates there may be 1,000 or more new Hosts associated with one or more Booking Agents that do not collect room rent on behalf of the Host. One additional position will be required to administer these accounts after the Division receives location and contact information from Booking Agents. When Host information is received from Booking Agents, the Division may request budget appropriation for the new position. 1 18 6 8 5 NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs: a. Amend PCC 6.04.010 Definitions as follows: Except where the context otherwise requires, the definitions given in this Section govern the construction of this Chapter. A. "Accrual accounting" means the eOperator enters the rent due from a transient on his/her records when the rent is earned, whether or not it is paid. B. "Bed and Breakfast Home" means a home where a r:esident individual or family rents out guest bedrooms (no more than two) in their house, which is continually occupied as their primary residence. C. "Bed and Breakfast Inn" means a home where a resident individual or family rents out guest bedrooms (between three and six) in their house, which is continually occupied as their primary residence. D. "Booking Agent" means an Operator or any person that provides a means through which a Host may offer a Short-Term Rental for transient lodging occupancy. This service is usually, though not necessarily, provided through an online platform and generally allows a Host to advertise the Short-Term Rental through a website provided by the Booking Agent's hosting platform and provides a means for potential users to arrange transient lodging occupancy and payment, whether the transient pays rent directly to the Host or to the Booking Agent. Booking Agents include, but are not limited to: 1. Online travel booking sites which are involved in the process of listing and booking Short-Term Rental transient lodging occupancies and handle any aspect of the resulting financial transaction; and/or 2. Online travel booking sites for Short-Term Rental transient lodging occupancy where advertisements of Short-Term Rental transient lodging occupancy rentals are displayed; and/or 3. A hosting or other online site that provides a means through which an Operator, Host or agent may offer a Short-Term Rental unit for transient lodging occupancy. D. ~"Bureau" means the Bureau of Licenses Revenue Division of the Bureau of Revenue and Financial Services of the City of Portland. &.. E.:_"Bureau Director" means the director of the Bureau of-licenses Revenue Division, or his/her designee. ~ G. "Business License Appeals Board" means a Board composed of five representatives appointed in the manner set forth in Section 7.02.295 of this Code. G. H. "Cash Accounting" means the operator does not enter the rent due from a transient on his/her records until rent is paid. H. h_"City Council" means the City Council of the City of Portland, Oregon. J. "Host" means the owner or person who resides at the Short-Term Rental or has been designated by the owner or resident to manage the Short-Term Rental and who rents out the Short-Term Rental for transient lodginq occupancy either directly or through the use of a Booking Agent. 2 h K. "Hotel" means any structure, or any portion of any structure, which is occupied or intended or designed for transient occupancy for 30 days or less for dwelling, lodging, or sleeping purposes, and includes, but is not limited to, any hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, studio hotel, bachelor hotel, lodging house, rooming house, apartment house, house, duolex. condominium, multi-dwelling structure, trailer home, houseboat, public or private dormitory, fraternity, sorority, public or private club, and also means space or portion thereof so occupied, provided such occupancy is for less than a 30-day period. J. b._"Occupancy" means the use or possession, or the right to the use or possession for lodging or sleeping purposes of any room or rooms in a hotel, or space in a mobile home or trailer park or portion thereof. K. M. "Operator" means the person who is proprietor of the hotel in any capacity. Where the operator performs his/her functions through a managing agent of any type or character other than as employee, the managing agent shall also be deemed as operator for the purposes of this Chapter and shall have the same duties and liabilities as his/her principal. Compliance with the provisions of this Chapter by either the principal or managing agent shall be considered to be compliance by both. b N. "Person" means any individual, firm, partnership, joint venture, association, host, social club, fraternal organization, fraternity, sorority, public or private dormitory, joint stock company, corporation, estate, trust, business trust, receiver, trustee, syndicate, or any other group or combination acting as a unit. M. 0. "Rent" means the consideration charged, whether or not received by the operator, for the occupancy of space in a hotel, valued in money, goods, labor, credits, property or other consideration valued in money, without any deduction. N. .E.:._"Rent package plan" means the consideration charged for both food and rent where a single rate is made for the total of both. The amount applicable to rent for determination of transient room tax under this Chapter shall be the same charge made for rent of the identical room when it is not a part of a package plan. Q. "Short-Term Rental" means a house, multi-plex, apartment, condominium, houseboat, trailer or other residential dwelling where a person rents guest bedrooms for transient lodging occupancy. Generally, a Short-Term Rental is zoned as residential property. 0. R. "Tax" means either the tax payable by the transient or the aggregate amount of taxes due from an operator during the period for which he/she is required to report his/her collections. P. §.:_"Transient" means any individual who exercises occupancy or is entitled to occupancy in a hotel for a period of 30 consecutive calendar days or less, counting portions of calendar days as full days. The day a transient checks out of the hotel shall not be included in determining the 30-day period if the transient is not charged rent for that day by the operator. Any such individual so occupying space in a hotel shall be deemed to be a transient until the period of 30 days has expired unless there is an agreement in writing between the operator and the occupant providing for a longer period of occupancy, or the tenancy actually extends more than 30 consecutive days. In determining whether a person is a transient, uninterrupted periods of time extending both prior and subsequent to the effective date of this Chapter may be considered. 3 18 6 5 b. Amend PCC 6.04.040 Operator's Duties as follows: A. Each eOperator shall collect the tax imposed by this Chapter at the same time as the rent is collected from every transient. The amount of tax shall be separately stated upon the operator's records, and any receipt rendered by the operator. No operator of a hotel shall advertise that the tax or any part of the tax will be assumed or absorbed by the operator, or that it will not be added to the rent, or that, when added, any part will be refunded, except in the manner provided by this Chapter. B. An Operator or Booking Agent that directly or indirectly accepts, receives or facilitates payment, including through Application Programming Interfaces (APls) or other computerized devices where third party providers receive information about a transaction and collect funds that may or may not be transmitted to the operator, owner or other person offering a Short-Term Rental, for the transient lodging occupancy from a transient is required to collect, report and remit transient lodging taxes to the City of Portland in accordance with this Chapter. C. Additionally, upon request of the Bureau for any regulatory or tax administration purpose, Operators, which include Booking Agents, must provide all physical addresses of transient lodging occupancy locations within Portland city limits and the related contact information, including the name and mailing address, of the general manager, agent, owner, or Host for the location. Any location and related contact information provided under this subsection is considered confidential and is not subject to public disclosure due to personal privacy concerns. c. Amend PCC 6.04.170 Violations as follows: It is unlawful for any eOperator or other person so required to fail or refuse to register as required herein, or to furnish any return required to be made, or fail or refuse to furnish a supplemental return or §!JY_other data required by the Bureau or to render a false or fraudulent return. No person required to make, render, sign, or verify any report shall make any false or fraudulent report, with intent to defeat or evade the determination of any amount due required by this Chapter. The Bureau Director may impose a civil penalty of up to $500JJQ for each violation of this Chapter. A violation includes, but is not limited to: A. Failure to file any required Transient Lodgings Tax payment and/or report, including any penalties and interest, within 60 days of the due date; B. Filing a false or fraudulent report; C. Failure to register a hotel or Short-Term Rental with the Bureau as described in Section 6.04.060; aAG D. Failure to maintain a separate account for the transient lodgings tax collected when required by the Bureau;.,. E. Failure to provide any data or other information requested by the Bureau, including but not limited to, the physical address of a transient lodging occupancy location within Portland and the related contact information; 4 18698 5 F. Failure to obtain an Accessory Short-Term Rental permit...orovide the Type A Permit Number or Type B Conditional Use case file number in advertising or other listing services, or post this number in the rental unit; and G. Failure by a Booking Agent to prominently dis.play the Accessory Short-Term Rental permit or case file number. Passed by the Council: JAN 2 1 2015 Mayor Charlie Hales Prepared by: Terri Williams, Scott Karter Date Prepared: 12/2/2014 Mary Hull Caballero Auditor of the City of Portland 'By ~~~~ Deputy 5 Agenda No. ORDINANCE NO. 18 8 9 8 5 As Amended Title Amend Transient Lodgings Tax to add definitions and clarify duties for operators for short-term 1 rental locations (Ordinance; amend Code Chapter 6.04) INTRODUCED BY CLERK USE: DATE FILED DEC 0 5 2014 Commissioner/Auditor: HAL'ES COMMISSIONER APPROVAL Lavonne Griffin-Valade Maver-Finance and Administration -Halt) , A.uditor of the City of Portland lJ - D Position 1/Utilities -Fritz -----:-~ By: c:::::-Position 2M/orks -Fish Position 3/Affairs -Saltzman \.-Deputy Position 4/Safetv -Novick ACTION TAKEN: BUREAU APPROVAL OEC 11 2014 K~5 eJ-fe;i)uL.£D rz> OEC 1 8 2014 .3 ; 3 o Pl'1 Bureau: Mayor's Office f;H C (!_~12 (A 1AI Prepared by: Terri Williams Date Prepared: 11/30/2014 DEC iS 2014 Financial lmP,act & Public PASSED TO SECOND READING AS AMENDED Involvement Statement JAN 14 2015 10:45 AM TIME CERTAIN Completed ~ Amends Budget D Portland Poli~ Document JAN 1 4 20 15 PASSID TO SECOND READING As Amended JAN 2 1 2015 If "Yes" requires ity Policy paragraph stated in docFfnt. No !'XI Yes 9:30 A.M. v City Auditor Office Approval: \; required for Code Ordinances --\<"l J('J\, v City Attorney Approval: ~ "-required for contract, code, easement, franchise, como olan, charter Council Meeting Date 12/11/14 AGENDA FOUR-FIFTHS AGENDA COMMISSIONERS VOTED AS FOLLOWS: TIME CERTAIN [8J Start time: 3 ~ '-\ S YEAS NAYS Total amount of time needed: 30 minutes 1. Fritz 1. Fritz ~ (for presentation, testimony and discussion) 2. Fish 2. Fish v CONSENTD 3. Saltzman 3. Saltzman v REGULAR D 4. Novick 4. Novick v Total amount of time needed: --(for presentation, testimony and discussion) Hales Hales - From:Ann Swenson To:James Hovland Subject:Re: Mtn biking at braemar and Nordic plan Date:Monday, June 27, 2016 11:52:38 AM I got this email. He wants to not have any snow making trails because he does not like the open trail plan. There is a lot of room on the west side of the course for single track courses for mountain bikes. Ann Sent from my iPad On Jun 27, 2016, at 9:35 AM, James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: <image001.gif>Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Bruce Freeman [mailto:brucefreeman05@earthlink.net] Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 3:58 PMTo: James HovlandSubject: Mtn biking at braemar and Nordic plan Mayor Hovland I was one of the two people who waited until the end of the council meeting on the 3 million dollar plan for x-c skiing and tubing and its related $330,000 consultation fee. Thank you very much for not fast tracking the project and asking for citizen input. I had just found out about the meeting the day before and I attended because I am extremely concerned about the plans' use of the terrain on the east side hills of Braemar because I believe that terrain should be preserved for mtn biking, not that the space can't be shared, but their plan makes that impossible as outlined. I was hoping we could met and talk about the Nordic plan and mtn biking. I have advocated for mtn biking at Braemar for quite a few years now which included a presentation to the park board, testifying at the citizens input meeting about the park system, a front page newspaper article in the Sun and numerous consultations with Ann Katreh. As it stands now, we have been repeatedly told by Ms. Katreh that no plans for any sport using Braemar can move ahead until the master plan is completed which doesn't even start until 2017. So I was extremely concerned and upset when I found out that one sport was possibly getting a fast track and even worse would use critical space that is needed for creating one of the finest mtn biking trails systems in the metro area. Also you should know that I spent the last 15 years as part of the management team running one of the most successful snow tubing operations in the twin cites at Buck Hill ski area so I am very knowledgeable about tubing costs and operations, snow making and all the related equipment. My schedule is very flexible. I live in Edina and could meet you at a time convenient to you but hopefully as soon as possible as we are now organizing to have a massive presence with the Edina Mtn Biking team and all our other supporters at the citizens input meeting on the Nordic plan. We will also be making another presentation to the Park Board at their July meeting. I look forward to meeting with you and explaining what an incredible opportunity we have at Braemar because of the unique hilly terrain to make one of the finest mtn biking trail systems in the metro at a tiny fraction of the cost of the Nordic plan. Thank you for your time. Bruce Freeman 612-812-2180 PS I am sending you some information I gave to Ann Katreh a few years ago and a map I created that shows the general outline of the trail system. For some reason the layout of the file got messed up but you can still read it. Thanks again for reading this before we meet <Best Braemar Overlook With colored Trails.jpg> <MtnBikingInfoforParkBoard12-5.PDF> From:Common Sense Edina To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:Scott H. Neal Subject:Common Sense for Edina - Chaska chooses new assistant city manager from pool of 4 candidates, Edina assistant manager promoted with no outside competition Date:Monday, June 27, 2016 12:47:05 PM The city of Edina needs to have an open hiring process that allows for a competitive hiring process especially for city management positions. It appears the appointment of hte assistant city manager was an internal promotion without a competitive hiring process. It seems other communities like Chaska want to find the best candidate available using a competitive process. Hopefully the election this fall will make changes to city leadership that will make city policies 'best practices' used by other communities. David Frenkel Star Tribune article June 24, 2016: Kabat named assistant city administrator Nate Kabat, a planner with Carver County, will become assistant city administrator for Chaska on July 6. Kabat, who has been working in the county’s Planning Zoning and Environmental Services Division, will succeed Jeffrey Dahl, who left the position to become Wayzata city manager. Kabat also served as coordinator for Carver County’s Resilient Communities partnership with the University of Minnesota. As part of the initiative, Kabat worked with Chaska officials on traffic studies in the community and a solar project. He was chosen from among four finalists. Beatrice dupuy http://www.startribune.com/west-metro-briefs-brooklyn-park-again-takes-annual-step-to- it-contest/384356481/?ref=nl New Edina Assistant city manager press release (2015) http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=pressroom_pressreleases&prrid=993 From:Myron Kassaraba To:Mark McEnearney Cc:Tranter, Emily J.; Steve Geiger; Joseph Pelton; Brian Stout; Libby Garvey; Edina Mail; Ambrose Clay Subject:Re: Community Outreach Task Group Date:Monday, June 27, 2016 4:17:49 PM Thanks for sharing this Mark. The fundamental challenge here is facing the reality that the major technical tool being enabled by NextGen and satellite navigation and PBN is more precise routing of flights (a.k.a. RNAV) and when this routing is used to concentrate flights over specific neighborhoods - it does have a significant negative impact. It would be advisable for the FAA and airport operators to take into consideration the experiences they have had in SFO, DCA, BOS, PHX where they have grossly underestimated the impact of the concentration of RNAV flight paths on populated communities well outside of the traditional 65 DNL contours. The places where NextGen RNAV has been a success are instances where the more precise navigation has been used to route flights over water or unpopulated areas. Universally, then the routing has created concentrated paths over populated areas, the results have been negative to the people on the ground. IMHO, this is not a "PR and education" problem when changes are providing a disproportionately positive impact to the airlines in the form of fuel savings and to the flying public in shorter flights at a large negative impact to the poor residents and communities living under super-concentrated flight paths. Mark is right - that other the generally useless computer models - the FAA does not collect actual "before" noise measurement data to be able to compare to conditions after implementation. The most ethical way to inform communities about the impact of proposed changes is to require any proposed change to be deployed provisionally or as a test that is well communicated to that people can actually experience what a permanent procedure would entail. It is totally disingenuous to make claims of "no significant impact" based on antiquated regulatory metrics when there is now 3-4 years of hard evidence from actually communities that have been significantly impacted. One can only hope that in the future this technology can be used in a way that not only delivers the benefits desired in safety and efficiency in the air but also is used to minimize the impact on those on the ground. Myron Myron KassarabaTown of Belmont Rep to the Logan CAC Treasurer, Massport CAC On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mark McEnearney <markmcenearney@gmail.com> wrote:Good afternoon Emily. Can you please post the RTCA's draft PBN Community Outreach Blueprint on the N.O.I.S.E. site and ask members for comment? I see you are a member of the committee that produced the blueprint. Can you please comment on the goal of increasing community acceptance of the inevitability of changes in noise impacts resulting from PBN changes? Why can't PBN changes be conditional on meeting community expectations for managing noise in ways that balance community interests with the interests of the aviation industry and the flying public? Also, can you please comment on the importance of providing timely, accurate, useful information about current noise impacts and projected future noise impacts for helping everyone understand what's going on and for informing decisions needed to achieve consensus? Myron Kassaraba (West Boston) commented on the importance of this at the March 6th summit and recommended making this a legislative priority. Unfortunately, there seems to be very little support in establishment circles for providing timely, accurate, useful information about noise impacts. Most recently, FAA Western Regional Administrator Glen Martin informed the Select Committee on South Bay Arrivals that the FAA did not even measure noise impacts prior to implementing metroplex changes in the South Bay area where complaints filed at SFO went from a total of one prior to March 2015 to over 1 million this year and the FAA does not plan to measure the noise impacts of proposed changes including the proposal to "restore" flight paths to an earlier route without also restoring previous higher altitudes which are a key issue for the BIG SUR route. Instead, the FAA will "rely on citizens to tell the FAA what and where the noise impacts are"! I wonder why Mr. Martin thinks this approach will convince Select Committee members whose Chairman Joe Simitian asked at the outset: How can we be convinced that what the FAA proposes to do to will in fact make this problem better? It would be very cool if N.O.I.S.E. could take a strong position on the importance of providing timely, accurate, useful information about current and projected future noise impacts. Without this information, the community outreach envisioned by your committee just feels like more spin to me. Many thanks. Mark McEnearney, Arlington, Virginia From:Rob Reed To:James Hovland; Scott H. Neal Subject:construction trucks on Gleason Road Date:Tuesday, June 28, 2016 8:34:27 AM Good Morning Mayor Hovland and Mr. Neal: My family and I live on Gleason Road between Valley View Road and Creek Valley Road. We know there is a big construction project going on at the high school right now. For the past few weeks, we have seen the many dump trucks coming and going from the site. However, the last two mornings it has become a problem. Yesterday, the first empty dump truck rumbled past our home at 6:18 am; today it was 5:58 am. Based on our city noise ordinance code, I would think that the trucks should not be driving to the site until 7 am or so. This was the case for the first few weeks and now it continues to get earlier day by day. We greatly appreciate your help with this matter. Sincerely, Brandi Reed 6605 Gleason Road From:Scott H. Neal To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com; "James Hovland" Subject:RE: Common Sense for Edina - Chaska chooses new assistant city manager from pool of 4 candidates, Edina assistant manager promoted with no outside competition Date:Tuesday, June 28, 2016 4:17:23 PM Attachments:image002.png image004.png All – Yes, I promoted Lisa Schaefer from within the organization to her current position. What Mr. Frenkel fails to mention is that Lisa was hired into our organization through a very competitive process in 2011 that included multiple panels of employees in the interview process. Same with her immediate predecessor Karen Kurt. Sometimes I promote from within because I feel we have the talent on staff that is ready for the next level. That was true with Ann Kattreh (Parks & Rec), Eric Roggeman (Finance) and Dave Nelson (Police). For other positions, such as Tom Schmitz (Fire), Chad Millner (Engineering) and Brian Olson (Public Works), there wasn’t a clear and ready current staffer to promote, so for those positions we did external competitive hiring processes. At the moment, we are doing a national search for the next General Manager of Braemar Field and Arena. It will be a competitive process. We are already receiving interest from exceptional candidates from across the country. Deciding when to promote from within vs. hire from outside is an art, not a science. There are many factors involved in making that important decision. Generally, I favor external competitive selection processes and will default that direction unless I am confident that we’ve got the best candidate already on our team. One final point. Mr. Frenkel’s praise of Chaska as an organization that must be using best practices because it just completed an external hiring process for its assistant city administrator position is interesting choice in that the Chaska city administrator Matt Podhradsky achieved his position through an internal promotion a few years ago after serving many years in the assistant city administrator role. For what it’s worth… Scott Scott Neal, City Manager 952-826-0401 | Fax 952-826-0390sneal@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov The City of Edina was named one of the Star Tribune’s Top Workplaces in 2015! From: Common Sense Edina [mailto:commonsenseforedina@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 12:47 PMTo: James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.comCc: Scott H. NealSubject: Common Sense for Edina - Chaska chooses new assistant city manager from pool of 4 candidates, Edina assistant manager promoted with no outside competition The city of Edina needs to have an open hiring process that allows for a competitive hiring process especially for city management positions. It appears the appointment of hte assistant city manager was an internal promotion without a competitive hiring process. It seems other communities like Chaska want to find the best candidate available using a competitive process. Hopefully the election this fall will make changes to city leadership that will make city policies 'best practices' used by other communities. David Frenkel Star Tribune article June 24, 2016: Kabat named assistant city administrator Nate Kabat, a planner with Carver County, will become assistant city administrator for Chaska on July 6. Kabat, who has been working in the county’s Planning Zoning and Environmental Services Division, will succeed Jeffrey Dahl, who left the position to become Wayzata city manager. Kabat also served as coordinator for Carver County’s Resilient Communities partnership with the University of Minnesota. As part of the initiative, Kabat worked with Chaska officials on traffic studies in the community and a solar project. He was chosen from among four finalists. Beatrice dupuy http://www.startribune.com/west-metro-briefs-brooklyn-park-again-takes-annual-step-to-it- contest/384356481/?ref=nl New Edina Assistant city manager press release (2015) http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=pressroom_pressreleases&prrid=993 From:Common Sense Edina To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:Scott H. Neal Subject:Common Sense for Edina - Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting (from Governing.com) Date:Wednesday, June 29, 2016 2:15:54 PM Attachments:Best-Practices-Local-Government-Budgeting_whitepaper.pdf FYI - from Governing.com (see attachment) : A government’s budget reflects its vision, strategy, and priorities. But managing a budget process that is inclusive, efficient, and transparent can be challenging for leaders who must engage many different stakeholders under tight deadlines. Download this executive brief to learn best practices for leading an efficient and transparent budget process from budget and finance leaders across the country. David Frenkel Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting Executive brief budget © 2015 OpenGov | www.OpenGov.com Created for OpenGov by BullsEye Resources, www.bullseyeresources.com.PG. 2 Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting “It [the budget] is the most important document and information that the organization can provide to its citizens because it talks about the priorities, the money coming in, the money going out, the operation, the organizational structure, the services being rendered.” —Melanie Purcell, OpenGov Overview A government’s budget reflects its vision, strategy, and priorities. And, the process used to create and communicate the budget reflects how government leaders operate. Effective budget processes are inclusive, transparent, and efficient. They build trust through involvement and buy-in from citizens, department leaders, and elected officials. When done right, key budget processes and information are communicated simply, clearly, and frequently, which results in greater transparency and trust. Context Based on insights from experts Christopher Rose, Budget Director in Miami, Florida; Tom Raguz, Finance Director in Cleveland Heights, Ohio; Nadine Alletto, Finance Director of the Village of Woodridge, Illinois; Barry Greenfield of EfficientGov; and Melanie Purcell of OpenGov, this summary provides important insights on budgeting practices in local governments. It identifies common challenges in the budget process and highlights effective budget processes, best practices, and lessons learned. Key Takeaways BudGeTs are lOCal GOvernmenTs’ mOsT imPOrTanT dOCumenTs. Budgets matter. They signal a municipality’s policies and civic priorities. The budget is where the rubber meets the road; it shows how a community will spend and invest. A budget reflects what matters most to a community; changes in a budget from one year to the next show the direction in which a community wants to head. For example, a city investing more in its police is placing a higher priority in public safety. BudGeT and finanCe direCTOrs faCe mulTiPle BudGeT ChallenGes. Among the challenges: ●Diminished local government revenues. Many states have seen their tax revenues fall and have in turn cut funding for local governments. ●Lack of clear direction from councils and boards, and often lack of alignment around a central vision or strategy. Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting PG. 3 © 2015 OpenGov | www.OpenGov.com Created for OpenGov by BullsEye Resources, www.bullseyeresources.com. “Important Quotes that reinfornce the key takeaways.” —Author ●Lack of buy-in from all key stakeholders. ●Low levels of citizen understanding, input, involvement, and engagement. ●Lack of budget ownership by departments. ●Difficulty tracking budget revisions and lack of meaningful performance measures. ●Staff turnover and burnout. muniCiPaliTies are develOPinG BudGeT BesT PraCTiCes TO OverCOme These ChallenGes. Budget and finance directors shared the practices they have adopted to improve their budgeting efficiency, effectiveness, buy-in, department ownership, and public involvement. These best practices include: ●have a clear, well-defined budget process. Each of the budget and finance directors could clearly describe all of the key steps of their government’s budget process, on an annual and month-by-month basis. They have a timeline with all key steps, know what has to happen at each step, when the step must occur, how long the step must take, and who should be involved. ●start with a vision, goals, and a strategic plan. The budget supports what a city or county wants to accomplish. For this reason, the first step in a good budget process is articulation of a clear vision by administrators and elected leaders. In Miami, the budget process begins with the mayor’s State of the City address, where the vision is laid out. In the Village of Woodridge, the budget process begins with a strategic planning and goal-setting session involving the Village’s board. In this session, board members share their visions and set short- and long-term goals. “You need buy-in for all involved. The way to create buy-in is to create a vision that all departments will buy into and make meaningful.” —Tom Raguz, Finance Director, Cleveland Heights, OH BUDGET PROCESS MAY Preliminary Revenue Forecast is prepared JUNE Resident Survey is conducted (every other year) Preliminary revenue and expenditure estimates presented to City Council (per City Charter) JULY Preliminary revenue and expense estimates included in Tax Budget First reading with public hearing and passage on the second/final reading AUGUST Results from Resident Survey evaluatedCouncil Adopts Budget Goals and PoliciesOperating & Capital Budget development parameters and instructions distributed to departments SEPTEMBER Budget requests submitted and evaluatedCapital projects submitted and evaluated OCTOBER Final operating and capital budget revisions are completed NOVEMBER Proposed Operating & Capital Budgets distributed to City Council and Senior StaffCity Council Budget Workshops held DECEMBER First Reading and Public Hearing of the Operating & Capital BudgetFinal reading and passage of the the Operating & Capital Budgets Example of a Municipal Budget Process Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting PG. 4 © 2015 OpenGov | www.OpenGov.com Created for OpenGov by BullsEye Resources, www.bullseyeresources.com. “Important Quotes that reinfornce the key takeaways.” —Author ●focus. Choose 1 to 2 challenges to focus on for the budget year. Tackling everything at once doesn’t work and leads to staff burnout. Pick a challenge, and come up with a strategy to address it, execute, and report the results back to the community. ●Get buy-in from all departments. In creating a budget, it is important for all departments to understand the vision and goals of the budget, and how they fit into the budget process. The presenters emphasized the importance of achieving buy- in across all departments, engaging all departments in creating and implementing the budget, and delegating work to various departments. ●invite citizen input. Budgets are more credible and receive more widespread support when citizens understand them and know that they have a voice in them. The budget and finance directors shared multiple ways in which their municipalities seek input. Municipalities may hold public hearings, town hall meetings, open houses, citizen academies, focused discussion sessions, and needs surveys. Common questions asked of residents are: —What’s most important to you? (common answers are public safety, maintenance and repair, and economic development) —What should be the city/county/district’s top priorities? —What do you want to see more of [from the local government]? —What are you willing to pay more for? ●Communicate the budget broadly, simply, and clearly. Once the budget has been developed, the key is to communicate it to all key stakeholders, including elected officials, departments, staff, and citizens. Successful local government leaders communicate the same information multiple times, in multiple ways. This includes through formal budget books, press releases, summary sheets, pdfs on websites, social media, and web-based tools such as OpenGov. an effeCTive BudGeT PrOCess Builds TrusT in lOCal GOvernmenT. For municipal leaders to successfully implement their plans they must have the support, buy-in, and most importantly, trust, of all key constituents. OpenGov’s Melanie Purcell quoted management consultant Dr. Michael Stewart, who said, “A leader can only implement what people can understand.” Therefore, successful implementation requires understanding and trust. Because budgets are complex and detailed, achieving understanding and trust requires moving from often overwhelming amounts of data to simple, clear information. Keys to successfully communicating priorities and building trust include: ●Be as transparent as possible. Trust is built through transparency. Share as much as you can, as often as you can. Repetition is a good thing. ●make it simple. Don’t assume the reader knows what you know or has the same level of expertise. Have staff or citizens (outside of the budget team) proofread the budget document. “A key component of our budget process is resident input. This has really been a key activity of the Village each year. We continually evaluate how we are engaging our residents and look for ways to improve our citizen involvement every year.” —Nadine Alletto, Finance Director, Village of Woodridge, IL Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting PG. 5 © 2015 OpenGov | www.OpenGov.com Created for OpenGov by BullsEye Resources, www.bullseyeresources.com. “Communicate, communicate, communicate. Do it repeatedly. Do it in writing. Publish the books and put together summary sheets based on them. Tell everyone where they fit in.” —Christopher Rose, Budget Director, Miami, FL ●Provide consistent, repeated messages. Deliver the same messages over and over, in different ways, using slightly different phrases and methods. Consistency helps to build trust. ●use compelling visuals. Pictures, charts, and interactive graphs (see example below) can help convey complex information in a simple way. ●make data dynamic. Create a dynamic webpage that provides flexibility and enables users to see multiple views of the same information. ●allow feedback and interaction. In addition to making budget information transparent and easily accessible, build trust by fostering frequent dialogues with citizens. ●Choose tools that make trusted communication easy. Use platforms and tools that make achieving transparency easy. presenting comprehensive data– showing multidimensional views 14 City of Thousand Oaks Best Practices General Best Practices Communication Best Practices Have a clear budget process/timeline Start with a vision, strategy, goals Get buy-in from all departments Invite citizen input Be as transparent as possible Communicate broadly, frequently, simply Use simple, clear language Go beyond words/use compelling visuals Make data easily accessible, dynamic Allow feedback, interaction PG. 6 © 2015 OpenGov | www.OpenGov.com Created for OpenGov by BullsEye Resources, www.bullseyeresources.com. Case Study: Miami, Florida Miami has 420,000 residents and an operating budget of $936 million. The city’s budget process begins in February and March with the mayor’s state of the city address, and as departments develop their budget submissions. This is followed by OMB reviews and initial meetings (April) and meetings with the city manager (May). Decisions are finalized (June/July), and after public hearing the budget is adopted. The new budget begins in October. Budget Director Christopher Rose thinks about key steps before, during, and after the budget is developed and adopted. • Before: Identify and borrow best practices, such as GFOA’s Recommended Budget Practices. Plan all dates, processes, and forms, and pick one or two key areas to focus on each year as part of the budget process. Then, lay the groundwork through meetings with department directors, staff, and elected officials. “This year, the idea we have picked is to be able to explain our budget better than anyone else in the world. So, we are taking a deeper dive into such things as infographics and data visualization, so anyone can understand our complex budget.” ͽ Christopher Rose, Budget Director, Miami, FL • During: Follow the plan that has been developed, keep moving forward, communicate constantly, delegate the work, and keep everyone aligned so that the budget is consistent with the strategy. • After: Adopt the budget by publishing the documents and creating concise summary sheets. Make the rounds with all key parties to communicate the important parts of the budget and answer questions. Tell everyone where they fit in. “Keep telling everyone where they fit in. Tell your staff. Tell the elected officials. Have department directors tell their front-line people where they fit in in the budget process.” ͽ Christopher Rose, Budget Director, Miami, FL Key Takeaways Communicate repeatedly Put it in writing Tell everyone where they fit in Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting MIAMI, FL Residents: 420,000 Operating Budget: $936.5M Gini Ratio 2nd, 3rd, or 8th in USA, similar to Mexico City An “Alpha City” that is a major center of finance, culture, media, entertainment, the arts, and international trade Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting PG. 7 © 2015 OpenGov | www.OpenGov.com Created for OpenGov by BullsEye Resources, www.bullseyeresources.com. Case Study: Village of Woodridge, Illinois The Village of Woodridge, 30 miles outside of Chicago, has 33,000 people and a budget of $45 million. Key elements of its budget process are: • A strategic planning/goal-setting session with the Village’s Board. • Establishment by the Board of short- and long-term priorities. • Resident input, through a town hall meeting with focused discussion groups and a community needs survey, as well as public comment at a board meeting. • A Strategic Action Plan Scorecard (shown below) to track progress on key priorities. The Village of Woodridge is constantly seeking opportunities to involve and educate the community; presents its financial information in a dynamic, user-friendly format; and uses social media to communicate. “Starting last year, we upload our budget data to our financial dashboard on our website. What this does is it puts our budget in a dynamic, instead of just a static, environment, where residents and the board and staff can actually interact with the data.” ͽ Nadine Alletto, Finance Director, Village of Woodridge, IL Key Takeaways Involve and educate the community Make budget information visually engaging Provide budget information in a dynamic format BUDGET PROCESS OVERVIEW • Strategic Planning/Goal Setting Session With Board • Board sets short and long term priorities • Strategic Action Plan Scorecard to track progress WOODRIDGE, IL Location: 30 miles southwest of Chicago Residents: 32,971 Budget: $45M Recognized by Money Magazine as one of the “Top 100 Places to Live” Home to Edward Don, a leading food service and equipment supplier; and Orbus Display & Exhibit Group Best Practices in Local Government Budgeting PG. 8 © 2015 OpenGov | www.OpenGov.com Created for OpenGov by BullsEye Resources, www.bullseyeresources.com. OpenGov is setting a new standard for how governments analyze, share, and compare financial data. Founded in 2012 with headquarters in Silicon Valley, OpenGov is the market leader in cloud-based financial transparency for state and local governments. The OpenGov financial analysis platform transforms budget data into intuitive, interactive reports that make it easy to show how taxpayer money is collected and spent. With OpenGov technology, governments collaborate more effectively through their budgeting process, make smarter data-driven decisions and build trust through greater transparency. The company currently serves more than 250 governments across 36 states including Minneapolis, New Haven, Addison, TX, and Orange County. “Important Quotes that reinfornce the key takeaways.” —Author Case Study: Cleveland Heights, Ohio Cleveland Heights, located 20 miles east of Cleveland, has a population of around 46,000 and a budget of $91 million. Its budget process begins in May with a preliminary revenue forecast, which is presented to the city council in June. Every other year a resident survey is also conducted in June. A public hearing takes place in July, and initial operating and capital budget parameters are distributed to departments in August. In September budget requests and capital projects are submitted and evaluated, and the final operating budget is completed in October. The budget is distributed to the city council and senior staff in November, with the first reading of the budget in December. Key learnings for finance director Tom Raguz are that the budget process must be collaborative, including staff, elected officials, and the public, and buy-in is needed from all involved. Also, communication and transparency are critical, it is essential to involve stakeholders early in the process, and it is important to shift responsibility to department directors. “The budget process is a collaborative effort among officials, executive staff, the public, and also management; it’s an organized collaborative effort. You need buy-in for all involved. The way to create buy-in is to create a vision that all departments will buy into and make meaningful.” ͽ Tom Raguz, Finance Director, Cleveland Heights, OH Key Takeaways The budget process is a collaborative effort You need buy-in from all; involve stakeholders early Communication and transparency are vital CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, OH Location: 20 minutes east of Cleveland Residents: 46,121 Budget: $91M Located close to museums, colleges, and world-renowned medical facilities, including Cleveland Clinic and University Hospitals From:Tracy Hartmann To:Edina Mail Subject:Nordic ski trails at Braemar golf course Date:Wednesday, June 29, 2016 9:58:21 PM To the council: Our family is in support of cross country ski trails at Braemar golf course. As avid skiers, we currently have to go to Minneapolis or Bloomington and it would be wonderful to have our own city trails. I think a trail fee would be more than reasonable and help offset some costs. There are many users of the nordic trails within not only the Edina athletic teams but also among community members. Please consider this proposal and count another family in support. Thank you, Tracy Hartmann From:paulacolestock@yahoo.com To:Edina Mail Subject:Contact Us form submission Date:Thursday, June 30, 2016 3:45:21 PM Name: Paula Colestock Organization: Website: paulacolestock@yahoo.com Address_1: 6613 southcrest drive Address_2: City: edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55435 Email: paulacolestock@yahoo.com Phone: 6128055508 Referrer: other Message: Yes! Please add fat tire bike paths and mountain bike paths at Braemar. They would be used by the Edina Cycling Team as well as the many avid cyclists in Edina. Thanks, Paula Colestock From:clover graham To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Kevin Staunton; swensonann1@gmail.com Subject:Safety protocols and warnings for crumb rubber fields Date:Thursday, June 30, 2016 5:09:12 PM Hello, Please see an example below of what other cities and towns that have crumb rubber fields have implemented in terms of warnings and safety protocols to protect children and athletes. Neither you nor the school district have responded to any of my requests for similar protocols and testing. There are many people in Edina that are incredibly concerned about the use of this material where children play. The protocol outlined below was suggested by the Department of Health in Boxford, Massachusetts. Thank you for your attention to this important public health matter, Clover Hackett Useful in regards to city action, precautionary recommendations, and syn turf [No. 57] Boxford, Massachusetts – BOH issues “precautionary” recommendations for use of artificial turf fields. According to a news report on WickedLocal (10 June 2016), on 25 may 2016, the Town of Boxford Board of Health issued the following recommendations: 1. Caution should be taken in playing on the artificial turf field at elevated temperatures due to the potential for heat stress, dehydration, and heat stroke; and the risk of exposure to volatilized PAH. 2. Coaches and managers should routinely encourage individuals who use the field to perform hand/body washing after playing on the field. 3. To avoid ingestion of crumb rubber particles, coaches and managers should strongly discourage eating and drinking out of open containers on the artificial turf field. Water and other liquids provided in containers with closable caps is encouraged to ensure good hydration, particularly in summer months when field temperatures may be high. If drinks are provided to players, they should be stored in a closed container at the edge of the artificial turf field. 4. Infants and toddlers should be discouraged from playing, crawling and rolling on the artificial turf field. The recommendations come at the heel of “[a]n independent report [that] has shown that carcinogenic polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) are present in the material. Sent from my iPhone From:James Grube To:John Hamilton Cc:Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); James Hovland; rdcjmiller@comcast.net Miller; Chris Bremer; Chad Millner; Mark K. Nolan; Mosing, Steve P.; jon.wertjes@minneapolismn.gov; Janis Callison; Allyson Lueneburg; Carl Michaud Subject:Xerxes Ave Bumpout Bollards Date:Sunday, July 03, 2016 7:34:50 AM Attachments:LED Bollard Locations.pdf All, I'm hoping you had noticed that new solar powered/LED lit bollards have been placed on two bumpouts along Xerxes Avenue. They went in the week of June 13 so they've been in for two weeks. I ask you to take a look at them at night to see what you think. Our initial reaction was that the lighting was a bit dim and I believe we tried to increase the intensity a bit. Please make sure you give them a good look both during the daylight and at night, and let me know. Thanks Jim Grube, PE County Highway Engineer Hennepin County 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 Office: 612-596-0305 Cell: 612-250-2615 Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. Existing Metal Bollards Install (2) LED Bollards Here Install (2) LED Bollards Here NOTE: Install bollards from edge of raised island to ensure snow plow clearance (consider blade overhang) From:Steve Swanson To:Edina Mail Subject:Compliments on the 4th of July at Alden(?) Park Date:Tuesday, July 05, 2016 1:25:00 AM Greetings, I would like to express my thanks and compliments on the 4th of July celebration that I attended in Edina. I’m thinking of two particular groups. -For those responsible for the fireworks display: I’m not a fireworks connoisseur, but your show was was very enjoyable. The ending was impressively stunning. Well done! -For the Edina Police Dept.: I was well impressed with traffic management after the fireworks display. I grew up in Bloomington and I’m very familiar with Edina in general and the Southdale area in particular. When I parked at Alden Park I anticipated something like a half hour traffic jam when leaving. Upon my departure I noticed part of the roadway was wisely closed off for pedestrians and officers were competently moving traffic out to the arterial streets. I was on the Crosstown in scarcely five minutes! Very well done! Best regards, Steven Swanson Otsego, MN From:bullardcm@aol.com To:James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Subject:Fourth of July Parade Date:Tuesday, July 05, 2016 9:48:10 AM Dear Mayor and City Council Members, Thank you for making sure the city of Edina goes all out to celebrate the Fourth of July. My family of twenty adults and a half-dozen kids enjoyed all of the festivities and the holiday fun. But there were simply too many political-type groups in the line up of the parade. In the past, we've been happy to see the candidates for office, and I love the fact that our sitting Senator and Congressman take the time to walk the parade. Even though I am a Republican, it made my day to shake hands with Keith Ellison. Such a friendly, nice man. And it was fun to see the Mayor and his lovely wife. And it was great to see all the bands and give a shout out to the Edina Girls Cross Country state champs. And, okay, I've even gotten used to Grandmothers for Peace. But, seriously--do we really need all the pro and con gun stuff? Fourth of July is a time for coming together as a community, for celebrating the things that make us a great nation. Watching as our fellow citizens cheer or jeer the NRA or the "People Concerned about Gun Violence" drives a wedge where none needs to exist, at least not for this one day. Many of the parade goers around us all seemed stunned by this. Please consider limiting such groups in the future. It would be better for everyone of they were left out. Thank you all for your tireless service to our community, Edina resident, Chris Bullard From:clover graham To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Kevin Staunton; swensonann1@gmail.com Subject:Fwd: Project TENDR Date:Wednesday, July 06, 2016 9:13:05 AM "We as a society should be able to take protective action when scientific evidence indicates that a chemical is of concern, and not wait for unequivocal proof that a chemical is causing harm to our children."That is part of the statement written by a coalition of researchers, doctors and children's health advocates calling themselves Project TENDR(Targeting Environmental Neuro-Developmental Risks) They have issued a call to action in the US to reduce exposures to toxic chemicals for children. Of the 8 chemical categories of concern outlined by this group of world renowned experts, and as reported in the attached NY times article, synthetic turf with crumb rubber contains chemicals in five of the categories. Examples of these include mercury, lead, flame retardants, benzene, toluene and PAH's. These chemicals have been identified as "prime examples of toxic chemicals and pollutants that increase children's risk for neurodevelopmental disorders."It is not just the parents of Edina or the parents nationwide that are concerned about the effect of these chemicals on their children.It is leading scientific researchers, physicians and children's environmental health advocates nationwide. A coalition of experts whose life's work has been dedicated to protecting children from toxic chemicals. They have stated that our system of assessing risk for children is broken and in need of repair. They are being proactive, not reactive. They are the leaders, not the followers for children's health. The tide is turning on toxic chemicals where children play.In the next year, more and more cities, towns and school districts will begin heeding these warnings and will be taking precautionary measures to limit children's exposures to toxins, as Duluth just voted to do. I urge you to read the articles (attached below) closely and reassess whether having the children of Edina play on these toxic chemicals daily is a prudent choice while we wait for the science of irreversible harm on crumb rubber to bear out.As a parent of three young children, I can tell you what my answer to that question would be. And I can tell you with certainty that there are hundreds of other parents, grandparents, caregivers, teachers and students in this wonderful city that feel the same. Thank you for your time, Clover http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/well/2016/07/01/a-call-for-action-on-toxic-chemicals/ http://www.conservationminnesota.org/news/interests/healthy-kids-and- families/lead-and-other-brain-toxins-still-a-problem/ http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/124/7/EHP358.alt.pdfSent from my iPhone From:Steve Timmer To:Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Chad Millner Cc:"Jean Colwell"; "Teri Whaley"; "mark epple" Subject:5oth Street Date:Wednesday, July 06, 2016 9:59:48 AM Gents, If you choke off 50th Street even more, it will send more traffic roaring down Golf Terrace, 54th Street and through the Country Club. I see little traffic enforcement on 54th as it is. I often check carefully for traffic both ways (and for pedestrians on the sidewalk, of course) and see none, but by the time I get backed out, I look in the rear view mirror and all I can see is the grill of some impatient @#$%$^ who made it from just past the bridge (which I can see from the end of the driveway but the street goes out of sight up the hill shortly thereafter) to the back end of my car in just several seconds. It’s unnerving, of course. Making 50th Street impassable will just make it worse for me and my neighbors. Steve From:Chad Millner To:"Steve Timmer"; Scott H. Neal; James Hovland Cc:"Jean Colwell"; "Teri Whaley"; "mark epple" Subject:RE: 5oth Street Date:Wednesday, July 06, 2016 10:05:08 AM Steve, Please give me a call. I don’t understand your comments about “choke off 50th Street even more”. Is there a specific project your concerned about? We don’t have any plans for 50th Street other than maintenance activities as needed. Thanks, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Steve Timmer [mailto:stimmer@planetlawyers.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 9:48 AMTo: Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; Chad MillnerCc: 'Jean Colwell'; 'Teri Whaley'; 'mark epple'Subject: 5oth Street Gents, If you choke off 50th Street even more, it will send more traffic roaring down Golf Terrace, 54th Street and through the Country Club. I see little traffic enforcement on 54th as it is. I often check carefully for traffic both ways (and for pedestrians on the sidewalk, of course) and see none, but by the time I get backed out, I look in the rear view mirror and all I can see is the grill of some impatient @#$%$^ who made it from just past the bridge (which I can see from the end of the driveway but the street goes out of sight up the hill shortly thereafter) to the back end of my car in just several seconds. It’s unnerving, of course. Making 50th Street impassable will just make it worse for me and my neighbors. Steve From:Common Sense Edina To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:Scott H. Neal Subject:Common Sense for Edina - Oil contaminated reclaimed asphalt pavement (Golf Terrace B) Date:Thursday, July 07, 2016 12:10:03 AM A neighbor had a discussion with a road reconstruction contractor that a pile of reclaimed asphalt pavement is contaminated with oil and is considered hazardous material. This approximately 30ft X 10ft x 6ft high pile of reclaimed asphalt is at the intersection of Concord and Lakeview Drive. If this pile of debris is hazardous material why isn't it tarped and fenced off so children do not play in it? Heavy rains are also eroding the pile of hazardous material. The city of Edina needs to be more transparent on this and inform the community what the situation is with this material. There are state laws regarding the transportation of hazardous materials and what landfills can be used for hazardous materials. When soil borings were done was this contamination found? How big a problem is contaminated soils and how much will it cost to remediate all the hazardous material? David Frenkel From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail Subject:FW: Excellent Date:Thursday, July 07, 2016 9:02:02 AM Attachments:image003.png Please send to the Park Board and City Council. Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Pete Glerum [mailto:pete.glerum@castlelake.com] Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2016 7:47 AMTo: Ann KattrehSubject: Excellent Ann, I received the note yesterday from you regarding the Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area proposal. I want to go on record as a major supporter! I am an avid Nordic skier and cyclist. I spend many days during the winter at Hyland Reserve and have logged many fatbike miles at the river bottoms. I live on Loch Moor Drive thus the thought of having real skiing and legal fat biking in Edina is an incredibly exciting. I cannot make the meeting next week due to work travel, but I wanted to share my support for the project. If there are private funds being solicited, please let me know as I would be supportive. I’m really excited by the proposal and wanted to simply thank you for being an advocate. Pete Peter H. Glerum | Castlelake 4600 Wells Fargo Center | 90 South 7th Street | Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: (612) 851-3100 | Mob: (612) 804-5232 | Fax: (612) 851-3090 pete.glerum@castlelake.com From:lwanning University of Minnesota To:lhoogenakker@edinamn.gov Cc:James Hovland; Traffic Safety Subject:Galleria expansion traffic safety considerations Date:Thursday, July 07, 2016 4:18:03 PM To the Planning Commission, Transportation Commission and Mayor Hovland, I have reviewed the proposed Galleria expansion plans, and have two modifications which I ask you to consider relative to pedestrian and bicycle safety. First, I ask that you add some form of traffic calming on the car lane between the parking ramp/hotel/condo building and the Galleria. There currently is a significant amount of cut-through traffic between 69th and 70th streets, where drivers are not entering either the Galleria or Hotel. They use the current car lane to avoid traffic signals on York at 69th and 70th, and generally speed through without regard to pedestrians. This is a safety hazard for pedestrians walking between the hotel or condos and the Galleria, whose traffic attention is likely less than when they are crossing a busy street. People might object to speed bumps or humps, but traffic calming approaches such as narrowing that car lane, adding curves to the car lane, etc. might significantly slow the speed and make it less advantageous to use it as a cut-through. Also, at one point there was consideration to relocating the pedestrian and bicycle.traffic easement to the car lane area. That could also be helpful in calming the traffic. Second, I ask that you add a pedestrian crosswalk between the condo 3209 entrance and the Galleria. There is far more pedestrian traffic on that route than the hotel, because many hotel guests use the underground walkway rather than the street level pedestrian crosswalk. Again, each pedestrian crosswalk will add to a traffic calming effect, particularly if they are dipped slightly as is the case with the existing brick crosswalks. Respectfully, Les Wanninger 3209 Galleria # 1608 Edina, MN 55435 Les Cell 952-457-7111 lwanning@umn.edu From:Eric Ecklund To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Subject:Unofficial Dan Patch Corridor Feasibility Study Date:Thursday, July 07, 2016 7:49:25 PM Attachments:Dan Patch Corridor-2016 Study.pdf City Council of Edina, Attached is an independent study I did of the Dan Patch Corridor regional passenger rail project between Minneapolis and Northfield. Although resources were limited for this study I hope that it will help push forward an official study of the Dan Patch Corridor and make people more aware of the details of this project. I look forward to working with the residents of Edina to make the Dan Patch Corridor successful and beneficial for your community. Eric Ecklund Dan Patch Corridor Regional Rail Feasibility Study By Eric Ecklund 7 July 2016 CHAPTER 1 Introduction The Dan Patch Corridor is a proposed passenger rail service be- tween Minneapolis and Northfield, and would be a resumption of pas- senger rail on this corridor since the discontinuation of service by the Minneapolis Northfield & Southern Railway in 1942. There are various types of rail service: Light rail-”LRT is an electrically powered, two-rail technology ca- pable of providing a broad range of passenger capacities, and operating as single vehicles or in short trains on a variety of alignment types. It is a mode combining vehicle technology very similar to that of streetcars, but operating primarily on a partially controlled right-of-way and typi- cally at higher speeds and passenger loadings. LRT typically operates with frequent stops spaced one-half mile to one-mile apart in dense ur- ban environments at speeds of 20 to 50 mph” (MnDOT 2010 State Rail Plan, p. 1-7). Heavy rail-”Heavy Rail Transit is an electric railway with the ca- pacity for a heavy volume of traffic in dense urban areas. It is electri- cally powered by a third rail which must be separated in its own right- of-way for safety. It is characterized by high-speed and rapid accelera- tion passenger railcars operating singly or in multicar trains on fixed rails; separated right-of-way from which all other vehicular and foot traffic are excluded; sophisticated signaling; and high platform loading at stops normally spaced one-half-mile to two miles apart” (MnDOT 2010 State Rail Plan, p. 1-7). Commuter rail-”Commuter Rail is an urban passenger train serv- ice that connects an urban region together over moderate distances; which typically operates on existing freight tracks; and whose primary clientele travels between home and work. These trip-to-work services usually offer concentrated frequencies primarily during rush hour, with suburban station spacing typically every five miles. Commuter rail service may be either locomotive-hauled or self propelled, and is char- acterized by reduced fare multi-trip tickets, specific station-to-station fares, and usually only one or two stations in the central business dis- trict. Average speeds are 18 to 55 mph” (MnDOT 2010 State Rail Plan, p. 1-7). Intercity rail-“Traditional intercity passenger rail services are typically more than 100 miles with as little as one to as many as 7 to 16 daily frequencies with station spacing from 10 to 100 miles apart. Top speeds of up to 79 miles per hour to as high as 90 miles per hour are common on shared freight track” (MnDOT 2010 State Rail Plan, p. 1- 7). High speed rail (HSR)-”HSR service has the characteristics of in- tercity rail service but at substantially higher speeds. It is most applica- ble in markets where the combination of travel demand and distance justifies the higher investment cost. Operations place an emphasis on significantly improved average end-to-end speeds along a corridor, of- ten with limited stops, offering travel advantages to auto and air travel- ers. North American practice defines HSR as being at least 110 mph. Operations can occur over track shared with slower passenger and freight trains at speeds of up to 150 mph, and on dedicated track where speeds in some countries now exceed 200 mph” (MnDOT 2010 State Rail Plan, p. 1-7). Regional rail-Though not an official definition, regional rail can be classified as low to medium frequency service all day in each direc- tion catering to more than just commuters who live in a suburban re- gion and work in the central business district. Diesel or electric locomo- tives or self propelled units can be utilized. Regional rail typically oper- ates between a central business district and the surrounding region, usually no more than 100 miles. This is the preferred mode for the Dan Patch Corridor. Interurban rail is considered a predecessor to commuter/ regional rail. Interurban routes spread rapidly in the early 1900s with the introduction of gas-electric railcars which were less costly to oper- 2 ate than steam locomotives. One of the first interurban lines to use gas- electric railcars was the Minneapolis St. Paul Rochester & Dubuque Electric Traction Company, commonly known as the Dan Patch Line, between Minneapolis and Northfield. The information in this study has been collected with limited re- sources due to this being an independent project. The Minnesota De- partment of Transportation (MnDOT) or any other government entity did not conduct this study. Potential stations on the Dan Patch Corridor City: Station site(s): Minneapolis Target Field Station St. Louis Park West End, Highway 7, Excelsior Blvd. Edina 50th/Vernon, Crosstown/Highway 62, Atwood/70th Bloomington Normandale Lake District, 98th Street, Old Shakopee Savage Downtown Savage at Highway 13 Burnsville County Rd. 42, Southcross Drive, Orchard Gardens Lakeville Kenrick Avenue, 185th Street, Downtown Lakeville Northfield Northfield Depot Likely station sites due to station location, surrounding land uses, and connections via foot, bike, car, and public transit: Target Field Station West End St. Louis Park at Highway 7 50th Street/Vernon Avenue Atwood/70th Street Normandale Lake District Old Shakopee Road Downtown Savage Burnsville at County Rd. 42 Orchard Gardens Kenrick Avenue Downtown Lakeville Northfield Depot The initial phase of the Dan Patch Corridor will most likely be be- tween Minneapolis and Northfield, with a future extension south to Al- bert Lea and eastern extension from Minneapolis to St. Paul. 3 CHAPTER 2 Resolutions from Stakeholders Community and group resolutions in fa- vor, neutral, or against the Dan Patch Corridor. Open Houses (MnDOT 2015 State Rail Plan, Appendix D) State Rail Plan open house in Duluth-“In addition to questions regarding the proposed Northern Lights Express (NLX) high speed rail between Duluth and Minneapolis, respondents desired passenger rail development to Mankato, Northfield, Chicago, Des Moines, and Omaha.” State Rail Plan open house in Northfield-“Eight out of ten com- ment forms included support for passenger rail, making this the most commonly heard theme at the Northfield open house. In addition, the majority of questions asked following the open house presentation per- tained to passenger rail. Support was expressed for a Twin Cities – Northfield connection and a Twin Cities – Milwaukee – Chicago con- nection. Attendees expressed interest in forming a local coalition in support of passenger rail between Northfield and the Twin Cities. It was noted that the city of Northfield is actively working on a historic rail depot relocation project.” 19 attendees State Rail Plan open house in Northfield 2nd round-”The major- ity of comments centered around respondents’ desires to develop pas- senger rail service from the Twin Cities to Northfield and southward to Des Moines via Albert Lea. Public members ranging from college stu- dents to retired seniors strongly expressed their support for this rail line, and many were pleased that the route had been upgraded to Phase I status in the 2015 State Rail Plan.” 27 attendees MN&S Railway Corridor Discussion-March 20, 2014. ”Additionally, at the February 27 ETC Special Meeting, members of the community ex- pressed a desire to study the feasibility of running LRT and/or diesel multiple unit (DMU) passenger rail in the MN&S corridor.” Letters and resolutions (MnDOT 2015 State Rail Plan, Appendix F) Supporting: BikeNorthfield Albert Lea Convention & Visitors Bureau Albert Lea Economic Development Agency Albert Lea-Freeborn County Chamber of Commerce All Abroad Minnesota Bridgewater Township Planning Commission Carleton College City of Austin City of Fairbault City of Farmington City of Northfield City of Owatonna City of Richfield City of St. Paul City of Savage City of Shakopee 5 City of Sleepy Eye City of Springfield City of Tracy City of Waseca State Representatives David Bly, Alice Hausman, Tina Liebling, Clark Johnson, Frank Hornstein, Rick Hansen, Dan Sparks, and John Consid- ine Northfield Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Northfield Hospital & Clinics Northfield Public Schools Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority Rice County Scott County Association For Leadership and Efficiency Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Communty St. Olaf College Steele County Neutral: Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority City of Bloomington- “A few years ago, the reference to the Dan Patch Corridor was re- moved from the City’s Legislative Policy. So, officially, while an individ- ual Council Member may have an opinion, the City does not have a po- sition regarding this issue. Should a viable proposal develop in this cor- ridor, the Council would likely develop an official position at that time.”-Karl Keel, Bloomington Director of Public Works. City of Edina- “Dear James Hovland, Does the City of Edina have an official stance on the proposal for passenger rail on the Dan Patch Corridor between Minneapolis and Northfield?” “Eric, thanks for the email. The Council has great interest in the matter of potential commuter or light rail on the Dan Patch Corridor and, in fact, had two members at a meeting last week discussing poten- tial financing of such a line but as yet we have taken no official position on passenger rail on the Dan Patch line corridor.”-James Hovland, City of Edina Mayor. City of Burnsville- “Dear Elizabeth Kautz, Does the City of Burnsville have an official stance on the proposal for passenger rail on the Dan Patch Corridor between Minneapolis and Northfield?” 6 “Dear Mr. Ecklund; No we don't.” -Elizabeth Kautz, City of Burnsville Mayor. City of Minneapolis-Referring to the Draft 2015 State Rail Plan; ”Over- all this is a very good plan that clearly outlines the needs for both the freight rail and passenger rail systems in Minnesota. The City of Min- neapolis looks forward to working with regional project partners to ad- vance projects that improve safety, mobility, and commerce for its resi- dents and businesses” (MnDOT 2015 State Rail Plan, Appendix F, p. 24). Opposing: City of St. Louis Park-”Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft of the 2015 State Rail Plan. The City of St. Louis Park’s com- ments on the plan relate to two proposed passenger rail lines identified as Phase 1 Corridors, specifically identified as the Twin Cities to Albert Lea (via Northfield) and the Twin Cities to Mankato. It is my under- standing from the draft plan that these corridors are proposed for the standard 79 mph rail service and would include the use of the CP/ MN&S subdivision in St. Louis Park also known as the Dan Patch line. The City of St. Louis Park has been on record as opposing the study of passenger rail on the CP/MN&S/Dan Patch due to significant concerns about the impact such a line/service would have on the St. Louis Park community. This opposition continues for a variety of reasons, not the least of which include major concerns about significant conflicts and safety issues that would be created on adjacent land uses such as single family homes and schools. I would also note that state statute prohibits the study of of passenger rail on the Dan Patch” (MnDOT 2015 State Rail Plan, Appendix F, p. 30-31) City of Lakeville-”Lakeville is opposed to any State or Federal funding that supports the study, planning, design or engineering of the Dan Patch Corridor. The Dan Patch Corridor is a proposed commuter rail line that would serve a region which runs from Minneapolis to Northfield through the City of Lakeville. It was proposed as a passen- ger rail line in 2000 after being identified as a "Tier One" corridor in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's 2000 8 Commuter Rail System Plan. Due to limited State and Federal funding of planning, de- sign, engineering and construction of transportation projects, priority should be given to the improvement and expansion of the existing road and bridge infrastructure and BRT system” (City of Lakeville Legisla- tive Priorities 2016, p. 7-8). Recommendations The Dan Patch Corridor is recommended for regional passenger rail service between Minneapolis and Northfield with future extensions to Albert Lea from Northfield and St. Paul from Minneapolis. The MN&S Subdivision, in which Dan Patch Corridor trains would operate, should not be abandoned and repurposed for other uses, nor should it be used for any type of passenger rail service between Minneapolis and Mankato due to the limited capacity of the MN&S Subdivision and suit- able alternative routes from St. Paul via Burnsville and Shakopee and from Minneapolis via Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Chaska, and Carver. The Spine Line between St. Paul, Albert Lea, and further south is also recommended for some type of passenger rail service, but not as a re- placement for the Dan Patch Corridor. 7 CHAPTER 3 Concerns, Issues, Solutions, and Benefits Although issues have been raised about the Dan Patch Corridor, there are solu- tions and benefits. Safety All rail corridors must be kept in acceptable condition for the safe movement of freight and passengers. For passenger rail corridors this is especially true, whereas a freight-only rail corridor can fall into disre- pair due to the railroad not having the money to maintain the track or not enough traffic and profit to justify maintaining it above minimum requirements set by the Federal Railroad Administration. The chances of dying in an auto-related accident are much higher than dying in a train-related accident. From the Minnesota Motor Vehi- cle Crash Facts of 2015; “In 2015 411 people died and 29,981 people were injured” (Minnesota Department of Public Safety). On an average day in 2015 there was one death and 82 injuries on Minnesota roads. “There have been three fatalities involving the Green Line since the St. Paul-to-Minneapolis service made its debut in June 2014. There have been 12 fatal collisions since the start of the Minneapolis-to- Bloomington Blue Line service in June 2004” (Pioneer Press). There have been two fatalities involving the Northstar Line since its debut in 2009 (Associated Press). The Northstar Line has had no derailments, and each light rail line has had one derailment neither of which resulted in serious inju- ries. There are ways to protect properties along the rail corridor from a derailment including installing crash-walls or guard rails. Crash- walls and guardrails would be constructed on segments of the Dan Patch Corridor in which there are abutting properties, sensitive envi- ronmental areas, and other areas. At-grade crossings with a high amount of automobile traffic and/or high speed automobile traffic should be replaced with an above-grade or below-grade crossing, which will allow car and train traffic to flow freely and also eliminate the need for trains to sound their horn. At-grade crossings that do re- main will have active-warning devices (flashing lights, bells, and possi- bly gates). Due to the amount of residential properties in close proxim- ity to the Dan Patch Corridor in the suburban areas, quiet-zone compli- ant crossings should be built. Positive Train Control (PTC) would be implemented making op- erations of freight and passenger trains safer by significantly reducing the chances of a collision. Private crossings, or worker-used crossings, exist along the Dan Patch Corridor between Lakeville and Northfield. These are used by homeowners to access their property across the tracks from a public road, and farmers who cross the tracks with agricultural equipment to access their fields. These crossings would also have active-warning de- vices, though studies would have to be made at each crossing to deter- mine if users should stop before crossing the tracks or if the grade- crossing needs to be modified to allow large equipment such as a trac- tor to cross the tracks. Trespassing on railroad property is illegal and can result in a fine and/or arrest. Trespassers on the Dan Patch Corridor are common whether it is people walking on the tracks or crossing the tracks ille- gally at a non-designated crossing, but with the implementation of pas- senger rail service it should deter most people from trespassing due to the frequency of trains and the fact that passenger trains are quieter than freight trains. Security fencing would also be installed along seg- ments of the corridor in which there is easy access onto the right-of- way. Sidewalks and trails should also be improved or installed near the corridor to reduce the possibility of a person trespassing. Alternatives The City of Lakeville believes bus rapid transit (BRT) on Inter- state 35W and Cedar Avenue/Highway 77 are better alternatives to the Dan Patch Corridor. However, BRT or any other type of bus service are 9 not suitable replacements for the Dan Patch Corridor. While BRT can and will be useful in certain areas of the Twin Cities, it is not a replace- ment for regional rail. Rail and bus both have their advantages and dis- advantages, but instead of solely relying on cars and buses and a de- pendence on roadways, the Twin Cities region also needs streetcars, light rail, regional rail, and intercity rail for travel needs. A competitive metropolitan region has diverse transportation modes. The Metro Orange Line is a proposed BRT corridor between Min- neapolis and Lakeville on I-35W opening as early as 2019 (2021 to Lakeville), and the Metro Red Line is a BRT corridor between the Mall of America in Bloomington and Lakeville via Cedar Avenue/Highway 77. There is little overlapping by the Metro Orange Line, Metro Red Line, and Dan Patch Corridor, thus making these BRT corridors not suitable replacements for the Dan Patch Corridor. The Orange Line will serve stops in downtown Minneapolis, South Minneapolis, Richfield, Bloomington, Burnsville, and one stop in Lakeville (Kenrick Avenue Park & Ride, which is catered only for commuters). The Red Line, east of I-35W, serves Apple Valley, Eagan, and the Mall of America with con- tinuing service to downtown Minneapolis via the Metro Blue Line. The Dan Patch Corridor is west of both of these corridors serving down- town Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Edina, West Bloomington, Savage, Burnsville, Lakeville, and Northfield. The Metro Orange Line and Dan Patch Corridor have a small overlap in northern Lakeville, and the Dan Patch Corridor may have a station near the southern terminus of the Orange Line. If the Orange Line could be extended to the Dan Patch Corridor station it would allow transit connection opportunities for travelers such as people using the Dan Patch Corridor to access Burns- ville Center with a transfer on the Metro Orange Line. BRT south of Lakeville would not be economical since the cost of operation far outweighs the minuscule ridership that would be gener- ated. There is no direct roadway connection between Lakeville and Northfield, which would increase travel time and make the service un- competitive with the automobile. Currently average weekday ridership on the Red Line is around 1,000, and the Orange Line is projected to have an average weekday ridership of 10,100 by 2030. There is a pro- posal to extend the Red Line south to 215th Street & Cedar Avenue in Lakeville, but most of the land along this proposed extension is cur- rently undeveloped and there is no timeline of when the extension would occur. Northfield Lines provides four to five weekday roundtrips be- tween Northfield and downtown Minneapolis via the Mall of America, MSP Airport, and the University of Minnesota. The Northfield Lines route does not overlap with the Dan Patch Corridor’s route, so the only competition for ridership would be people going between downtown Minneapolis and Northfield. While it would be cheaper to subsidize the Northfield Lines service to provide more buses, it would not have the same economic impact as the Dan Patch Corridor, nor serve the same areas, and would also have much lower ridership. Bus service is also more impacted by traffic and weather than rail service. Union Pacific’s Albert Lea Subdivision, also known as the Spine Line, has also been labeled an alternative for the Dan Patch Corridor. The Spine Line is between St. Paul and Albert Lea via Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount, and Farmington. Just as with the BRT corridors the Spine Line does not serve the same areas as the Dan Patch Corridor except for Northfield. The right-of-way of the MN&S Subdivision has been studied as a potential trail corridor as part of the Lake Marion Greenway project in Dakota County. Dakota County offered to purchase the out-of-service right-of-way through Savage, Burnsville, and Lakeville from Canadian Pacific Railway (CP). “The MN&S line travels from downtown Lakeville to the Minnesota River through Lakeville, Burnsville and Savage. This portion of the rail line is currently inactive and leased to Progressive Rail. Canadian Pacific Railway has said it is not interested in divesting the corridor and do not believe that there is any potential to use the MN&S line as a recreational trail” (Lake Marion Greenway Master 10 Plan, p. 30). Although there would not be a trail along the Dan Patch Corridor, the Dan Patch Corridor would bring improvements to pedes- trian and bike connections along the corridor with upgrades to side- walks, installation of sidewalks and bike lanes, and improved safety fea- tures at crossings and intersections. Autonomous car (also known as driverless car) technology is be- coming more common, though as of now remains unaffordable for most people. In the coming decades autonomous cars will become more common and more affordable, however this cannot completely replace public transportation. In the 50s and 60s people believed auto- mobiles would replace the need for public transportation, but as we have seen this is not the case, and it would be a repeat mistake to be- lieve that autonomous car technology is a cure-all for our transporta- tion and infrastructure problems. Although autonomous cars would make travel by car safer, it does not eliminate the need for maintaining the vehicle and the roadways that it uses. Anti-transit advocates have also pointed out that the capital costs for transit projects could be used to purchase automobiles for people who currently do not have a car. While this may be true, it does not solve the problem of traffic congestion and putting too much depend- ence on our roadways. There is also the fact that fuel, maintenance, and insurance costs for the vehicles need to be paid as well, not just the purchase of the vehicles. Freight Operations The MN&S Subdivision is owned by CP, Progressive Rail (PGR), and Twin Cities & Western Railroad (TC&W). Currently the corridor receives very light traffic with one daily train on the northern end be- tween Minneapolis and Bloomington, and one daily train between Lakeville and Northfield. At any time the frequency of freight trains can change. The tracks between Savage and Lakeville are out-of- service, which is not the same as an abandoned status; the railroad still owns the right-of-way and the corridor can be rehabbed at any time to resume freight service. Implementation of passenger rail on the Dan Patch Corridor, which would involve upgrading track and other infra- structure, could encourage CP or other freight rail companies to send freight trains on the MN&S Subdivision. However even if passenger rail is not implemented, CP may still reopen the corridor for freight trains. “The corridor is part of Canadian Pacific’s long term strategy for moving rail freight through and around the Twin Cities and will return to active status in the future” (Lake Marion Greenway Master Plan, p. 30). How many trains and what the trains would carry all depends on the market. CP owns the tracks between Minneapolis and Lakeville (not including the Dan Patch Line Bridge, which is owned by TC&W), and PGR owns the tracks between Lakeville and Northfield (PGR leases a segment of the tracks in northern Lakeville for railcar storage). The tracks would be maintained and safety precautions would be taken to ensure that freight rail, passenger rail, and the communities can co- exist. It is unlikely CP would send oil trains or any other train consist- ing of around 100 railcars on the MN&S Subdivision because their Mis- sissippi River route is a more direct way to eastern oil refineries and is built and maintained for those kinds of trains. Further information on freight operations on the Dan Patch Corridor can be found in Chapter 4. Environment An environmental impact statement would be required if the Dan Patch Corridor goes into further study. Contamination of soil on rail- road property is common, and one source of contamination is leakage of materials or liquids from locomotives and railcars. The railroads and owners of the railcars are responsible for maintaining railcars to en- sure that they do not leak material or fluids. Another contamination is the chemical used on wooden railroad ties; creosote, which is a herbi- 11 cide and wood preserver, but also a carcinogen. Most of the Dan Patch Corridor has wooden ties. It is also common to see old and rotted ties along the sides of the right-of-way. An environmental cleanup of wooden ties and other contaminations would be needed. Track up- grades would include concrete ties instead of wooden ties since con- crete ties last longer and do not have to be treated with creosote. Herbi- cides are also sprayed on the railroad right-of-way to prevent plant growth on the tracks, and concerns have been raised that the herbicide could seep into groundwater and contaminate watersheds. This will re- quire studying under the environmental impact statement. Trees too close to the right-of-way would need to be removed to allow the safe passage of trains. The exact number of trees that would need to be removed is currently not known, however new trees can be planted where there is enough width of right-of-way and around sta- tions. Trees between properties and the right-of-way would help re- duce noise from passing trains. Property Concerns There are concerns about property values along the tracks due to the possibility of noise and vibration problems. Eliminating at-grade crossings and implementing quite-zone ordinances would help with the noise concerns. In addition the passenger rolling stock on the Dan Patch Corridor would be diesel multiple units (DMUs) and/or electric multiple units (EMUs). Multiple-units are smaller and quieter than die- sel locomotives, and more efficient than diesel locomotives on routes where there is not sufficient demand for a locomotive pulling carriages that can seat around 100 passengers each. With EMUs overhead wires would need to be installed, which increases cost, but eliminates the po- tential problem of diesel fumes. The highest speed for freight trains on the MN&S Subdivision is currently 20 miles per hour. For homes along the tracks in Bloomington, Edina, and St. Louis Park that were built in the 50s, 60s and 70s (when freight trains operated at speeds of 20 miles per hour with as many as 60 railcars), there appears to be no problems with vibrations from freight trains. DMUs and EMUs would produce less vibration. Passenger trains would operate at speeds of no more than 55 miles per hour in the suburban area of this corridor (a 60 mile per hour speed limit may be allowed on the Wayzata Subdivision between Minneapolis and St. Louis Park since there are no abutting properties and the right-of-way is built for higher speeds). The highest speed achievable would be 79-90 miles per hour on a stretch of rural track between Lakeville and Northfield. The squeal of steel wheels contacting rails on curves is also a con- cern raised. The amount of noise that could be produced depends on how much of a curve there is. Welded rail would be installed on the Dan Patch Corridor, which lasts longer than jointed rail, allows trains to operate at faster speeds, and reduces wheel noise. The railroad right-of-way is already in place, but a few properties in Edina, St. Louis Park, and Lakeville abut the tracks and may need to be acquired. Cost In the 2001 study of the Dan Patch Commuter Rail, the capital cost of the project was around $500 million in 2010 dollars. A new study will need to be conducted in order to determine the capital cost of the project. There would be various funding sources for the project including, but not limited to, the federal government (potentially cover- ing half the capital cost), the state government, MnDOT, regional rail- road authorities in which the Dan Patch Corridor serves, communities in which the Dan Patch Corridor serves, the Metropolitan Council, and the Counties Transit Improvement Board. An estimated capital cost for the Dan Patch Corridor can be found in Chapter 6. 12 Benefits The Dan Patch Corridor is an already established railroad corri- dor, which means little to no properties would need to be acquired for this project. The Dan Patch Corridor parallels segments of Highway 100, Highway 169, and Interstate 35, giving people a new option of travel in these areas. Transit oriented development has become popular in American cities including the Twin Cities. Transit oriented development has been built along the Metro Blue and Green Lines and Northstar Line, and this is likely near stations on the Dan Patch Corridor. Outside of the central business district of Minneapolis there is already medium den- sity development near potential Dan Patch Corridor stations at West End, St. Louis Park, 50th Street/Vernon Avenue, Atwood, Normandale Lake District, Old Shakopee Road, Savage, and Northfield. Higher den- sity transit oriented development is encouraged in the surrounding ar- eas of Dan Patch Corridor stations, particularly Kenrick Avenue Sta- tion in Lakeville due to this being a potential meeting point with the Metro Orange Line and a proposed I-35E BRT between Lakeville and St. Paul. Affordable housing quotas are mandated by the Metropolitan Council, and affordable housing is encouraged near transitways in or- der for people to have less dependence on the automobile; for some people an automobile is unaffordable and transit is a necessity. The communities in which the Dan Patch Corridor serves each have quotas for affordable housing, and if the Dan Patch Corridor is built it would provide an opportunity to build some of the affordable housing re- quired. Ridership of transit systems continues to rise and people want better service. For communities to thrive, transportation options need to be diverse in order to meet the diverse travel demands of residents. Not only would the Dan Patch Corridor provide a new option of travel for residents to reach destinations, but also encourage travelers to visit communities. Destinations directly served by the Dan Patch Corridor include: Target Field Cedar Lake Trail Edina Industrial Park Normandale Lake District Hyland Lake Park Reserve Downtown Savage Minnesota River trails Downtown Lakeville Airlake Industrial Park Downtown Northfield Malt-O-Meal Nearby destinations accessible by existing or proposed transit connec- tions at Dan Patch Corridor stations include: Downtown Minneapolis from Target Field Station University of Minnesota from Target Field Station West End Shopping District from West End Station 13 Numerous employers and residences along the Interstate 394 Corridor from West End Station Cargill Headquarters from St. Louis Park Station Downtown Hopkins from St. Louis Park Station Uptown from St. Louis Park Station Lake Calhoun and Lake Harriet from St. Louis Park Station Excelsior & Grand from St. Louis Park Station 50th & France from 50th St./Vernon Ave. Station Southdale from Atwood Station and Normandale Lake District Station Eden Prairie from Normandale Lake District Station Numerous employers and residences along the Interstate 494 Corridor from Normandale Lake District Station Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area from Normandale Lake District Sta- tion Downtown Shakopee from Savage Station Burnsville Center from Burnsville Station and Kenrick Avenue Station Buck Hill Ski and Snowboard Area from Orchard Gardens Station Apple Valley from Orchard Gardens Station Kenrick Avenue Park & Ride from Kenrick Avenue Station St. Olaf and Carelton College from Northfield Station 14 CHAPTER 4 Freight Operations Analysis of freight operations on the MN&S Subdivision in the past, present, and future. The Dan Patch Corridor was an important north-south rail corri- dor avoiding the busy rail yards of Minneapolis and St. Paul while still connecting with Class 1 railroads. This is what made the Minneapolis Northfield & Southern Railway (MN&S) successful between its inheri- tance of the corridor in 1918 to its absorption into the Soo Line in 1986. Until 1942 the MN&S also operated interurban passenger trains, but its main operation was freight trains. The frequency of trains by the MN&S is unknown, but operations consisted of trains between Glen- wood Yard and Northfield, between Glenwood Yard and Richfield, and interchanging with other railroads along the entire corridor. As freight train traffic dropped, the advantage the MN&S had diminished. Shortly after the Soo Line purchased the MN&S the Soo Line was purchased by CP. Although numerous local customers have switched to truck shipping or have gone out of business along the MN&S Subdivi- sion, PGR maintains healthy business on the High Line Spur in Bloom- ington and Richfield and the Airlake Industrial Park in Lakeville. Traffic counts in 1993 (2001 Dan Patch Corridor Commuter Rail Feasi- bility Study): -as many as 30 trains per day between Minneapolis and St. Louis Park -3 to 5 trains per day between St. Louis Park and Savage -0 trains per day between Savage and Lakeville It is assumed that traffic was 1 daily roundtrip train between Lakeville and Northfield. The traffic count most likely included BNSF’s Wayzata Subdivision, which is why there is a high number of trains be- tween Minneapolis and St. Louis Park; it is likely only 3 to 4 of these trains were on the MN&S Subdivision. Operations on the MN&S Subdi- vision during this time were by CP and TC&W. In 1997 PGR was founded and handled switching traffic at the Airlake Industrial Park in Lakeville, and in 2001 PGR purchased the High Line Spur from CP, and the two railroads interchange in Bloom- ington. PGR then purchased the tracks between Lakeville and Northfield in the mid-2000s. As mentioned before there is currently one daily roundtrip train operated by CP between Minneapolis and St. Louis Park (this train op- erates twice weekly to interchange with PGR in West Bloomington), one daily roundtrip train between Northfield and Lakeville operated by PGR, and in the near future there could be around four weekly trains between St. Louis Park and Savage operated by TC&W. It is difficult to predict what freight train traffic will look like in the future due to the rise and fall in shipping demands and the costs of shipping, but estimates can be given on what levels of freight traffic could be on the MN&S Subdivision in the future. There has been speculation that PGR will eventually purchase the right-of-way between Bloomington and MN&S Jct. in North Minneapo- lis. PGR would then handle all local customers on the MN&S Subdivi- sion. Short-line railroads such as PGR are credited with handling local traffic better than Class 1 carriers, which tend to put more importance on bulk traffic such as intermodal, coal, and oil trains. PGR may also benefit from having its High Line and Lakeville operations connected with the rehabbing of the MN&S Subdivision in Lakeville, Burnsville, and Savage. BNSF and Union Pacific (UP) are connected to the MN&S Subdi- vision, but it is unlikely that either railroad would want to operate trains on this corridor since they have their own corridors and traffic along the MN&S Subdivision would be light. The projected traffic listed assumes that ownership of the MN&S Subdivision would remain as is today. PGR’s High Line Job is not in- cluded since this train operates on the MN&S Subdivision for a short length. 16 Potential Freight Traffic on the MN&S Subdivision Railroad: Movement: Frequency: CP MN&S Job* 5 weekly CP MN&S through-train 10 weekly PGR High Line connector 3 weekly PGR Lakeville Turn* 5 weekly TC&W Savage Turn 5 weekly Total 28 weekly *existing traffic For simplification freight traffic was only looked at on the MN&S Subdivision. Dan Patch Corridor trains would also use BNSF’s Wayzata Subdivision and UP’s Spine Line but only for a short length. There are various types of freight transported on the MN&S Sub- division, which include mulch, lumber, grain, merchandise, sand, plas- tic, salt, produce, and chemicals. Haz-mat placards have been observed on some railcars on the MN&S Subdivision but it is unknown what kind of hazardous materials are transported. Trains are typically around 20 railcars long, and most likely would be no more than around 40 railcars long. More information on future freight movements and impact on capacity on the Dan Patch Corridor is provided in Chapter 7. 17 CHAPTER 5 Rolling Stock Types of rolling stock considered for the Dan Patch Corridor. Push-pull operations using locomotives and coaches, as is done on the Northstar Line, would not be considered for the Dan Patch Corri- dor. Temporal separation of freight traffic and passenger traffic (freight operations are suspended during passenger operations and vice versa) is not feasible for the Dan Patch Corridor and so would also not be considered. Electric multiple units (EMUs) and/or diesel multi- ple units (DMUs) that comply with the Federal Railroad Administra- tion’s crash-worthiness standards would be utilized on the Dan Patch Corridor. EMUs are powered via overhead wires and are useful on high fre- quency corridors. Although the Dan Patch Corridor would not be high frequency service, BNSF’s Wayzata Subdivision is the only rail connec- tion into downtown Minneapolis, and other regional rail corridors that are proposed would benefit from overhead wires already being in- stalled on this corridor. EMUs are also quieter than DMUs and have no emissions. To reduce cost EMUs would only be used as far south as Lakeville. DMUs are powered by diesel engines within the railcar and are useful on lightly used regional rail corridors. Overhead wires are not required which significantly reduces cost. Although DMUs are quieter than diesel locomotives, they are louder than EMUs and there is the possibility of emissions problems in areas along the corridor, though this is unlikely. DMUs would use the entire Dan Patch Corridor, but if EMUs are also selected DMUs would be used for lighter frequency serv- ice to Northfield. There are only a small number of EMUs and DMUs sharing tracks with freight trains in North America, but the popularity of them is increasing since they are more economical on regional rail corridors that do not have the demand for locomotives and coaches, and are proven successful on European regional rail systems. Multiple units us- ing different fuel sources, such as natural gas, could also be considered for the Dan Patch Corridor if available, though at this time there are no known multiple-unit trains using energy sources other than electric and diesel. The Dan Patch Corridor has numerous curves, which makes pas- senger operations with locomotives more challenging, while EMUs and DMUs are better able to travel on curvy rail corridors, particularly those with tilt technology. The chosen rolling stock should also be utilized on other pro- posed regional rail corridors. The rolling stock would have seating for 150-200 passengers. Platforms at each station would be able to accom- modate a single railcar. An operations & maintenance facility (OMF) would need to be built for the storage and maintenance of rolling stock. From an effi- ciency standpoint for transit operations the OMF should be located in Minneapolis near Target Field Station. There is a proposal to build an OMF in the Linden Yards area west of downtown for passenger trains, but there has been opposition to this and conflicting proposals for resi- dential and commercial development as part of the Metro Green Line extension. Another possible location would be southern Lakeville near the Airlake Industrial Park. With other regional rail corridors being a possibility however, there is the potential dilemma of whether to have numerous small facilities on the terminus of these corridors, or one or two facilities in a central location. It appears likely that the small rural facilities approach will be utilized since the Northstar Line OMF al- ready exists in Big Lake and there are challenges to acquiring highly valuable land near the central business districts of Minneapolis and St. Paul. 19 CHAPTER 6 Capital Costs Costs are approximate and in 2016 dol- lars. Rehabbing current corridor*: MN&S Sub. mainline track-$64.8 million Rehabbing corridor between Savage and Lakeville-$250,000 Additional track/Sidings*: Wayzata Sub. double track-$4.5 million MN&S Sub. sidings.-$52.2 million Overhead wire installation between Minneapolis and Lakeville-$152 million Rolling Stock: $10 million per unit (based on costs from orders for DMUs/EMUs from various transit agencies) $520 million for 52 units Crossing Upgrades*: $250,000 per crossing for active warning devices: Cedar Lake Trail (pedestrian, minor upgrades for quiet-zone compli- ance) Brunswick Avenue (2x, pedestrian, minor upgrades for quiet-zone com- pliance) Excelsior Blvd. (minor upgrades for quiet-zone compliance) East Bush Lake Road (minor upgrades for quiet-zone compliance) Chalet Road (minor upgrades for quiet-zone compliance) 215th Street Highview Avenue 225th Street Hamburg Avenue 240th Street private crossing (3x) farm crossing (3x) 280th Street 290th Street 300th Street Eveleth Avenue 315th Street Total-$5.25 million Crossing closures: 29th Street 42nd Street 21 two private crossings in Edina $450,000 per crossing for active warning devices and quiet zone com- pliance: 28th Street Dakota Avenue Lake Street/Library Lane Walker Street Alabama Avenue 41st Street 49th Street Brookside Avenue Hansen Road Valley Lane Burnsville Parkway 143rd Street Southcross Drive 150th Street 152nd Street 155th Street 168th Street 172nd Street Kenrick Avenue 188th Street Jaguar Avenue Ipava Avenue Dodd Blvd. 207th Street 210th Street Holyoke Avenue Dresden Avenue Greenvale Avenue St. Olaf Avenue 2nd Street 3rd Street Total-$14 million Underpasses/overpasses: Bridge over Highway 7-$2 million Bridge over CP Bass Lake Spur-$1.5 million Bridge over Cambridge Street-$1 million 22 Pedestrian bridge at Crosstown-$500,000 Bridge over Eden Avenue-$1 million Bridge over Dewey Hill Road-$1 million Pedestrian tunnel at 98th Street-$750,000 Pedestrian tunnel at Dakota Road-$750,000 Bridge over Old Shakopee Road-$10 million Minnesota River Bridge-$75 million Bridge over Union Pacific/Highway 13-$4 million Bridge over Highway 13 Frontage Road-$1 million Bridge over Quentin Avenue-$1 million Bridge over Lynn Avenue-$1.5 million Bridge over Credit River-$400,000 Pedestrian bridge at Judicial Park-$500,000 185th Street underpass-$10 million Pedestrian tunnel Lake Marion Greenway-$750,000 Bridge over 250th Street-$10 million Bridge over Galaxie Avenue-$6 million Bridge over 5th Avenue-$10 million Total-$148.25 million Capacity Rights^: between Minneapolis and Northfield-$108.8 million between Minneapolis and Lakeville-$123 million PTC Installation: unknown Environmental Mitigation*: $3.3 million Safety Barriers*: $165,000 per mile for security fencing Total-$2.8 million $1.5 million per mile for crashwalls Total-$1.35 million $1 million per mile for guardrails Total-$5.89 million 23 Station Construction: West End-$7 million St. Louis Park-$15 million 50th Street/Vernon Avenue-$15 million Atwood-$5 million Normandale Lake District-$5 million Old Shakopee Road-$5 million Savage-$10.5 million Burnsville-$15 million Orchard Gardens-$5 million Downtown Lakeville-$4 million Northfield-$3 million OMF: $100 million Estimated capital cost: $1.4 to 1.7 billion *based on cost estimates from the 2001 Dan Patch Corridor Commuter Rail Feasibility Study and adjusted for inflation ^based on cost estimates from the 2015 State Rail Plan Please note that these are cost estimates based on the proposed capacity/frequency on the Dan Patch Corridor (more information on Chapter 7). It is likely that the frequency of trains would be less than what is proposed in this study, therefore requiring less sidings, less roll- ing stock, a smaller OMF, reduced cost of capacity rights, etc. 24 CHAPTER 7 Track Configuration and Capacity Analysis Operations of Dan Patch Corridor with shared use by passenger and freight trains. Passenger rail services would be split into local and regional service: Local service-Minneapolis to Downtown Lakeville serving all stops Regional service-Minneapolis to Northfield; no service at Atwood, Old Shakopee Road, Orchard Gardens, and Kenrick Avenue stations Frequency Local trains weekday: Peak hour-every 30 minutes Off peak-every hour Local trains weekend-every hour Regional trains weekday: Peak hour-every hour Off peak-every two hours Regional trains weekend-every two hours Proposed maximum frequency of passenger trains-6 trains per hour (3 in each direction) between Minneapolis and Lakeville Single Track Capacity Between GN Jct. and MILW Jct.: approximately 14 trains per hour (7 in each direction) Between Garden Park (Edina) and Atwood: approximately 8 trains per hour (4 in each direction) Between Normandale Lake and Old Shakopee Road: approximately 8 trains per hour (4 in each direction) Between Savage and Burnsville Parkway: approximately 8 trains per hour (4 in each direction) Between Orchard Gardens and Kenrick Avenue: 10 trains per hour (5 in each direction) Between Kenrick Avenue and Jaguar Avenue: 8 trains per hour (4 in each direction) Downtown Lakeville: 26 22 trains per hour (11 in each direction) Eureka Township: 8 trains per hour (4 in each direction) Multiple Track Segments Minneapolis: A double-track main would be built parallel to BNSF’s Wayzata Subdivision, except for a short choke point west of Target Field in which the width of right-of-way only allows for a single track for pas- senger trains and a single track for freight trains. A stub track would also be built for Northstar Line trains for midday layovers. St. Louis Park: The double-track main would continue on GN Jct. and for a short length south of the connection with CP’s MN&S Subdivision. Just south of the bridge over Highway 7 a double-track segment would be built allowing two passenger trains to serve St. Louis Park Sta- tion at the same time. This double-track segment would continue south until just north of the bridge over Minnehaha Creek in Edina. Edina: Parallel to Brookside Avenue a double-track segment would be built allowing two trains to serve the 50th St./Vernon Ave. Station at the same time. This double-track segment would continue south until just north of the Hansen Road grade-crossing. Just south of the tunnel under 70th Street the single-track seg- ment would split into three tracks allowing two passenger trains to serve Atwood Station and a freight train or regional train to operate through the station at the same time. South of Atwood Station the right-of-way is wide enough for a short fourth track segment if needed. Just north of the underpass at 78th Street the segment would be double-track until just south of the Normandale Lake District Station in Bloomington. Bloomington: The Nesbitt Siding and Auto Club Siding would be connected cre- ating a double-track segment. In addition a short third track segment would be built at Old Shakopee Road Station allowing two passenger trains to serve the station and a freight train or regional train to oper- ate through the station at the same time. At Auto Club Junction a six- track yard would be built allowing CP and PGR to interchange without blocking the mainline. The double-track segment would continue south across the Minnesota River to Savage. Savage: The double-track segment from Bloomington would continue south until just north of the bridge over Quentin Avenue, which would allow two trains to serve the Savage Station at the same time. Burnsville: A double-track segment would begin just south of the Burnsville Parkway grade-crossing and connect with a previously existing siding at Orchard Gardens. This would allow two passenger trains to serve the Burnsville and Orchard Gardens stations at the same time. Lakeville: Just south of the 172nd Street grade-crossing a double-track seg- ment would begin plus a short third track allowing two passenger 27 trains to serve Kenrick Avenue Station and a freight train or regional train to operate through the station at the same time. The triple-track segment would end just south of the station. Just south of the Jaguar Avenue grade-crossing a double-track segment would begin and end just south of the Downtown Lakeville Station, which would allow two passenger trains to serve the station at the same time. Due to right-of-way constraints the tracks will merge and then split again in the Airlake Industrial Park area. From there the corridor will have four tracks; two mainline and two for freight switch- ing. Just south of the Airlake Industrial Park a stub track would be built allowing local passenger trains to layover before returning north to Minneapolis (also potential location of the OMF). Eureka Township: The double-track segment in southern Lakeville would continue until just south of the bridge over 250th Street. Castle Rock and Northfield: A double-track segment would begin approximately 3 miles south of Eureka Township and continue all the way to Northfield. The corridor would then be triple-track in downtown Northfield; two tracks for passenger trains and one track for freight trains (UP’s Spine Line). Freight Operations CP MN&S Job: CP’s MN&S Job typically operates in the late morning and noon hours on the Dan Patch Corridor. This train serves one customer in St. Louis Park, Hill Salt, which is located near MILW Jct. Currently this involves breaking off the train at MILW Jct. on the mainline, taking the railcar or railcars for Hill Salt, and switching out the railcar or railcars to be shipped out. After this is completed the train returns to the main- line and reconnects with the rest of the train. Twice weekly this train continues south to Auto Club Junction in Bloomington to interchange with PGR’s High Line Job. Every weekday PGR drops off railcars at Auto Club Jct. to be shipped on CP’s MN&S Job, and CP drops off rail- cars that PGR will take to East Bloomington and Richfield. With the implementation of regional rail service, CP’s MN&S Job would most likely not be able to sit on the mainline at MILW Jct. while delivering and picking up railcars at Hill Salt. The current process takes approximately 30-40 minutes, and due to the constricted right- of-way a third track could not be built without property acquisition. There are two options to mitigate this; 1) have CP’s MN&S Job switch onto TC&W trackage to break off the train, return to the MN&S Subdivi- sion, and deliver the railcars to Hill Salt, or 2) make the Hill Salt Spur double-track so the train does not have to sit on the mainline. The most likely option is the former, since a new wye track will be built at MILW Jct. to allow easier movement between the CP and TC&W track- age. The latter option would involve blocking Louisiana Avenue for a significant amount of time while delivering and picking up railcars. Interchanging with PGR at Auto Club Junction should not be an issue with the rebuilding of Auto Club Yard to allow interchange be- tween CP and PGR without blocking the mainline. TC&W Savage Turn: Connecting between TC&W tracks and CP’s MN&S Subdivision at MILW Jct. is currently a difficult and long process that can take around 2 hours to break up the train on one rail corridor and reconnect the train on the other rail corridor. Due to this the current operation is not feasible with the implementation of regional rail service, so as part of the Southwest LRT project a new wye track would be built allowing 28 seamless connection between TC&W’s Glencoe Subdivision and CP’s MN&S Subdivision. Approaching the Minnesota River the train must stop, wait for any barge traffic that is in the area, and rotate the Dan Patch Line Bridge into the closed (rail connected) position to cross the river. A new river crossing would be built and would be in the closed position except in cases where a barge is approaching (it is assumed that barge operations will not have a major impact on the operations of the Dan Patch Corridor). After crossing the river the train continues south crossing High- way 13 and goes as far south as Quentin Avenue. The train then re- verses into Port Cargill where the railcars are unloaded. After unload- ing the train will return onto the mainline and head back north to St. Louis Park. To decrease the amount of time this train is blocking the mainline the train will switch onto Union Pacific yard tracks just east of the CP MN&S Subdivision. When traffic on the mainline is clear the train will cross on a diamond to the current unloading tracks at Port Cargill, and then the reverse when going back to St. Louis Park. PGR Lakeville Turn: This train begins at the Northfield Yard in southern Northfield, delivers railcars at the Airlake Industrial Park in Lakeville, and returns to Northfield. With regional rail service the operation of the Lakeville Turn needs to be off the mainline as much as possible once at the Air- lake Industrial Park and sorting railcars, though because trains operat- ing south of Lakeville would have less frequency this should not be a major issue. BNSF Wayzata Subdivision: Most trains on the Wayzata Subdivision are operating to/from Willmar, the exceptions being two daily trains that switch onto BNSF’s Monticello Subdivision at Lyndale Junction near downtown Minneapo- lis and two-four daily trains that switch onto the Kenilworth Corridor at Cedar Lake Junction. For the Dan Patch Corridor project there would be a dedicated freight mainline on the Wayzata Subdivision be- tween Target Field Station and GN Jct., and 1-2 passenger mainline tracks for regional trains. The freight mainline would be the northern track, allowing most freight trains to operate without blocking the pas- senger mainline. Trains entering or leaving the Kenilworth Corridor would stop at Cedar Lake Junction for any approaching traffic and then proceed crossing over the passenger mainlines. PGR High Line Connector: This is a potential new freight train operating at most a few times weekly between Northfield and Auto Club Junction. This train would interchange with PGR’s High Line Job from East Bloomington and Richfield. CP MN&S through-train: This is a potential new freight train operating between Humboldt Yard and southern Minnesota with up to two daily trains. It is assumed that this train would not serve local customers on the MN&S Subdivi- sion, but rather interchange with other trains and serve local custom- ers in southern Minnesota. Travel Time for Passenger Trains Minneapolis-West End: 5 minutes 29 West End-St. Louis Park: 6 minutes St. Louis Park-50th/Vernon Avenue: 5 minutes 50th/Vernon Avenue-Atwood: 6 minutes Atwood-Normandale Lake District: 3 minutes Normandale Lake District-Old Shakopee Road: 7 minutes Old Shakopee Road-Savage: 10 minutes Savage-Burnsville: 10 minutes Burnsville-Orchard Gardens: 5 minutes Orchard Gardens-Kenrick Avenue: 7 minutes Kenrick Avenue-Downtown Lakeville: 8 minutes Downtown Lakeville-Northfield: 15 minutes Total travel time for local trains between Minneapolis and Downtown Lakeville-approximately 72 minutes Total travel time for regional trains between Minneapolis and Down- town Lakeville and Northfield respectively-approximately 57 minutes and 72 minutes Travel Time for Freight Trains Note that travel times are for cases in which the freight train does not have to stop or significantly slow down, but does account for the average speed on segments. Between GN Junction and MILW Junction: top speed of 25 miles per hour travel time approximately 6 minutes Between MILW Junction and Garden Park Siding: top speed of 30 miles per hour travel time approximately 5.5 minutes Between Garden Park Siding and Atwood: top speed of 30 miles per hour travel time approximately 5 minutes Between Atwood and Nesbitt Siding: top speed of 30 miles per hour travel time approximately 10 minutes Between Nesbitt Siding and Auto Club Junction: top speed of 30 miles per hour travel time approximately 3 minutes 303 Between Auto Club Junction and Savage Junction: top speed of 25 miles per hour travel time approximately 5.5 minutes Between Savage Junction and Savage Station: top speed of 30 miles per hour travel time approximately 2 minutes Between Savage Station and Burnsville Station: top speed of 25 miles per hour travel time approximately 11 minutes Between Burnsville Station and Orchard Gardens Station: top speed of 25 miles per hour travel time approximately 7 minutes Between Orchard Gardens Siding and Kenrick Siding: top speed of 25 miles per hour travel time approximately 5.5 minutes Between Kenrick Siding and Downtown Lakeville Station: top speed of 30 miles per hour travel time approximately 7 minutes Between Downtown Lakeville Station and Airlake Industrial Park: top speed of 25 miles per hour travel time approximately 7 minutes Between Airlake Industrial Park and southern end of Eureka Siding: top speed of 55 miles per hour travel time approximately 4 minutes Between southern end of Eureka Siding and Castle Rock Siding: top speed of 45 miles per hour travel time approximately 2.5 minutes Between Castle Rock Siding and Northfield Station: top speed of 79 miles per hour travel time approximately 9 minutes 31 Total travel time between GN Jct. and Northfield Yard-85.5 minutes 32 Concept Schedule for Dan Patch Corridor Dan Patch Line Weekday Schedule (Regional Trains) Northbound Departure time (read down): Friday night only: Trip # R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 Northfield 4:30 5:30 6:30 7:30 8:30 9:30 10:30 12:30 2:30 3:30 4:30 5:30 6:30 8:30 10:30 12:30 AM Downtown Lakeville 4:45 5:45 6:45 7:45 8:45 9:45 10:45 12:45 2:45 3:45 4:45 5:45 6:45 8:45 10:45 12:45 Kenrick Avenue x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Orchard Gardens x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Burnsville 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 1:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 9:00 11:00 1:00 Savage 5:10 6:10 7:10 8:10 9:10 10:10 11:10 1:10 3:10 4:10 5:10 6:10 7:10 9:10 11:10 1:10 Old Shakopee Road x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Normandale Lake District 5:22 6:22 7:22 8:22 9:22 10:22 11:22 1:22 3:22 4:22 5:22 6:22 7:22 9:22 11:22 1:22 Atwood x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 50th/Vernon 5:28 6:28 7:28 8:28 9:28 10:28 11:28 1:28 3:28 4:28 5:28 6:28 7:28 9:28 11:28 1:28 St. Louis Park 5:33 6:33 7:33 8:33 9:33 10:33 11:33 1:33 3:33 4:33 5:33 6:33 7:33 9:33 11:33 1:33 West End 5:39 6:39 7:39 8:39 9:39 10:39 11:39 1:39 3:39 4:39 5:39 6:39 7:39 9:39 11:39 1:39 Minneapolis-Target Field 5:44 6:44 7:44 8:44 9:44 10:44 11:44 1:44 3:44 4:44 5:44 6:44 7:44 9:44 11:44 1:44 33 Dan Patch Line Weekday Schedule (Regional Trains) Southbound Departure time (read down): Friday night only: Trip # R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 Minneapolis-Target Field 5:45 6:45 7:45 8:45 9:45 10:45 11:45 1:45 3:45 4:45 5:45 6:45 8:45 10:45 11:45 1:00 AM West End 5:50 6:50 7:50 8:50 9:50 10:50 11:50 1:50 3:50 4:50 5:50 6:50 8:50 10:50 11:50 1:05 St. Louis Park 5:56 6:56 7:56 8:56 9:56 10:56 11:56 1:56 3:56 4:56 5:56 6:56 8:56 10:56 11:56 1:11 50th/Vernon 6:01 7:01 8:01 9:01 10:01 11:01 12:01 2:01 4:01 5:01 6:01 7:01 9:01 11:01 12:01 1:16 Atwood x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Normandale Lake District 6:07 7:07 8:07 9:07 10:07 11:07 12:07 2:07 4:07 5:07 6:07 7:07 9:07 11:07 12:07 1:22 Old Shakopee Road x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Savage 6:19 7:19 8:19 9:19 10:19 11:19 12:19 2:19 4:19 5:19 6:19 7:19 9:19 11:19 12:19 1:34 Burnsville 6:29 7:29 8:29 9:29 10:29 11:29 12:29 2:29 4:29 5:29 6:29 7:29 9:29 11:29 12:29 1:44 Orchard Gardens x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Kenrick Avenue x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Downtown Lakeville 6:44 7:44 8:44 9:44 10:44 11:44 12:44 2:44 4:44 5:44 6:44 7:44 9:44 11:44 12:44 1:59 Northfield 6:59 7:59 8:59 9:59 10:59 11:59 12:59 2:59 4:59 5:59 6:59 7:59 9:59 11:59 12:59 2:14 34 Dan Patch Line Weekday Schedule (Local Trains) Northbound Departure time (read down): Trip # L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 Northfield x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Downtown Lakeville 4:55 5:25 5:55 6:25 6:55 7:25 7:55 8:25 8:55 9:25 9:55 10:25 11:25 12:25 1:25 2:25 3:25 3:55 4:25 4:55 5:25 Kenrick Avenue 5:03 5:33 6:03 6:33 7:03 7:33 8:03 8:33 9:03 9:33 10:03 10:33 11:33 12:33 1:33 2:33 3:33 4:03 4:33 5:03 5:33 Orchard Gardens 5:10 5:40 6:10 6:40 7:10 7:40 8:10 8:40 9:10 9:40 10:10 10:40 11:40 12:40 1:40 2:40 3:40 4:10 4:40 5:10 5:40 Burnsville 5:15 5:45 6:15 6:45 7:15 7:45 8:15 8:45 9:15 9:45 10:15 10:45 11:45 12:45 1:45 2:45 3:45 4:15 4:45 5:15 5:45 Savage 5:25 5:55 6:25 6:55 7:25 7:55 8:25 8:55 9:25 9:55 10:25 10:55 11:55 12:55 1:55 2:55 3:55 4:25 4:55 5:25 5:55 Old Shakopee Road 5:35 6:05 6:35 7:05 7:35 8:05 8:35 9:05 9:35 10:05 10:35 11:05 12:05 1:05 2:05 3:05 4:05 4:35 5:05 5:35 6:05 Normandale Lake District 5:42 6:12 6:42 7:12 7:42 8:12 8:42 9:12 9:42 10:12 10:42 11:12 12:12 1:12 2:12 3:12 4:12 4:42 5:12 5:42 6:12 Atwood 5:45 6:15 6:45 7:15 7:45 8:15 8:45 9:15 9:45 10:15 10:45 11:15 12:15 1:15 2:15 3:15 4:15 4:45 5:15 5:45 6:15 50th/Vernon 5:51 6:21 6:51 7:21 7:51 8:21 8:51 9:21 9:51 10:21 10:51 11:21 12:21 1:21 2:21 3:21 4:21 4:51 5:21 5:51 6:21 St. Louis Park 5:56 6:26 6:56 7:26 7:56 8:26 8:56 9:26 9:56 10:26 10:56 11:26 12:26 1:26 2:26 3:26 4:26 4:56 5:26 5:56 6:26 West End 6:02 6:32 7:02 7:32 8:02 8:32 9:02 9:32 10:02 10:32 11:02 11:32 12:32 1:32 2:32 3:32 4:32 5:02 5:32 6:02 6:32 Minneapolis-Target Field 6:07 6:37 7:07 7:37 8:07 8:37 9:07 9:37 10:07 10:37 11:07 11:37 12:37 1:37 2:37 3:37 4:37 5:07 5:37 6:07 6:37 Schedule continues on next page 35 Friday night only: L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28 L29 x x x x x x x x 5:55 6:25 7:25 8:25 9:25 10:25 11:25 12:25 AM 6:03 6:33 7:33 8:33 9:33 10:33 11:33 12:33 6:10 6:40 7:40 8:40 9:40 10:40 11:40 12:40 6:15 6:45 7:45 8:45 9:45 10:45 11:45 12:45 6:25 6:55 7:55 8:55 9:55 10:55 11:55 12:55 6:35 7:05 8:05 9:05 10:05 11:05 12:05 1:05 6:42 7:12 8:12 9:12 10:12 11:12 12:12 1:12 6:45 7:15 8:15 9:15 10:15 11:15 12:15 1:15 6:51 7:21 8:21 9:21 10:21 11:21 12:21 1:21 6:56 7:26 8:26 9:26 10:26 11:26 12:26 1:26 7:02 7:32 8:32 9:32 10:32 11:32 12:32 1:32 7:07 7:37 8:37 9:37 10:37 11:37 12:32 1:37 36 Dan Patch Line Weekday Schedule (Local Trains) Southbound Departure time (read down): Trip # L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L14 L15 L16 L17 L18 L19 L20 L21 Minneapolis-Target Field 5:22 5:52 6:22 6:52 7:22 7:52 8:22 8:52 9:22 9:52 10:22 11:22 12:22 1:22 2:22 3:22 3:52 4:22 4:52 5:22 5:52 West End 5:27 5:57 6:27 6:57 7:27 7:57 8:27 8:57 9:27 9:57 10:27 11:27 12:27 1:27 2:27 3:27 3:57 4:27 4:57 5:27 5:57 St. Louis Park 5:33 6:03 6:33 7:03 7:33 8:03 8:33 9:03 9:33 10:03 10:33 11:33 12:33 1:33 2:33 3:33 4:03 4:33 5:03 5:33 6:03 50th/Vernon 5:38 6:08 6:38 7:08 7:38 8:08 8:38 9:08 9:38 10:08 10:38 11:38 12:38 1:38 2:38 3:38 4:08 4:38 5:08 5:38 6:08 Atwood 5:44 6:14 6:44 7:14 7:44 8:14 8:44 9:14 9:44 10:14 10:44 11:44 12:44 1:44 2:44 3:44 4:14 4:44 5:14 5:44 6:14 Normandale Lake District 5:47 6:17 6:47 7:17 7:47 8:17 8:47 9:17 9:47 10:17 10:47 11:47 12:47 1:47 2:47 3:47 4:17 4:47 5:17 5:47 6:17 Old Shakopee Road 5:54 6:24 6:54 7:24 7:54 8:24 8:54 9:24 9:54 10:24 10:54 11:54 12:54 1:54 2:54 3:54 4:24 4:54 5:24 5:54 6:24 Savage 6:04 6:34 7:04 7:34 8:04 8:34 9:04 9:34 10:04 10:34 11:04 12:04 1:04 2:04 3:04 4:04 4:34 5:04 5:34 6:04 6:34 Burnsville 6:14 6:44 7:14 7:44 8:14 8:44 9:14 9:44 10:14 10:44 11:44 12:44 1:44 2:44 3:44 4:14 4:44 5:14 5:44 6:14 6:44 Orchard Gardens 6:19 6:49 7:19 7:49 8:19 8:49 9:19 9:49 10:19 10:49 11:49 12:49 1:49 2:49 3:49 4:19 4:49 5:19 5:49 6:19 6:49 Kenrick Avenue 6:26 6:56 7:26 7:56 8:26 8:56 9:26 9:56 10:26 10:56 11:26 12:26 1:26 2:26 3:26 4:26 4:56 5:26 5:56 6:26 6:56 Downtown Lakeville 6:34 7:04 7:34 8:04 8:34 9:04 9:34 10:04 10:34 11:04 12:04 1:04 2:04 3:04 4:04 4:34 5:04 5:34 6:04 6:34 7:04 Northfield x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Schedule continues on next page 37 Friday night only: L22 L23 L24 L25 L26 L27 L28 L29 6:22 7:22 8:22 9:22 10:22 11:22 12:22 1:22 AM 6:27 7:27 8:27 9:27 10:27 11:27 12:27 1:27 6:33 7:33 8:33 9:33 10:33 11:33 12:33 1:33 6:38 7:38 8:38 9:38 10:38 11:38 12:38 1:38 6:44 7:44 8:44 9:44 10:44 11:44 12:44 1:44 6:47 7:47 8:47 9:47 10:47 11:47 12:47 1:47 6:54 7:54 8:54 9:54 10:54 11:54 12:54 1:54 7:04 8:04 9:04 10:04 11:04 12:04 1:04 2:04 7:14 8:14 9:14 10:14 11:14 12:14 1:14 2:14 7:19 8:19 9:19 10:19 11:19 12:19 1:19 2:19 7:26 8:26 9:26 10:26 11:26 12:26 1:26 2:26 7:34 8:34 9:34 10:34 11:34 12:34 1:34 2:34 x x x x x x x x 38 CHAPTER 8 Station Characteristics Stations will be easily accessible by all modes of movement including walking and biking. Station amenities would be similar to light rail and Northstar Line stations. West End Station: Platform configuration-island platform with above-grade or below-grade ac- cess between Cedar Lake Road and Cedar Lake Trail Parking-none Transit connections-Routes 9 and 604 St. Louis Park Station: Platform configuration-split platform with pedestrian tunnel under railroad right-of-way and bridge access to Cedar Lake Trail and Walker Street Parking-existing parking lot west of station that could be utilized, though cur- rent use unknown, alternatively build parking ramp next to station with ap- proximately 200 spaces Transit connections-Routes 17, 604, 615, 668, and Metro Green Line (pro- posed) 40 50th Street/Vernon Avenue Station: Platform configuration-island platform with elevator and stair access to Gus Young Lane and 50th Street/Vernon Avenue Parking-existing parking ramp south of station, though current level of use un- known; undeveloped land in between Arcadia Avenue and railroad right-of- way where a park & ride ramp could be built with approximately 350 spaces Transit connections-Routes 46, 146, and 587 Atwood Station: Platform configuration-split platform with stair and ramp access to 70th Street Parking-approximately 100 space parking lot west of station platforms Transit connections-Routes 515 or 516 (proposed), 540 (proposed) and 578 41 Normandale Lake District Station: Platform configuration-split platform Parking-approximately 100 space parking lot in between railroad right-of-way and East Bush Lake Road north of 84th Street Transit connections-Routes 6 (proposed), 540, and American Blvd. BRT (proposed) Old Shakopee Road Station: Platform configuration-split platform with stair and ramp access to Old Shakopee Road Parking-approximately 130 space parking lot and potentially 100 exist- ing spaces at parking lot east of station, though current use unknown Transit connections-Routes 537 (proposed), 541 (proposed), 589, and 597 42 Savage Station: Platform configuration-island platform with stair and elevator access to 123rd Street Parking-approximately 400 space parking ramp east of station platform Transit connections-Routes 421, 491, and Minnesota Valley Line (proposed) Burnsville Station: Platform configuration-island platform with stair and elevator access to County Road 42 Parking-approximately 500 space parking ramp northeast of station platform Transit connections-Routes 444 and 464 43 Orchard Gardens Station: Platform configuration-split platform Parking-approximately 150 space parking lot in between railroad right-of- way and County Road 5 Transit connections-Route 420 (proposed) Kenrick Avenue Station: Platform configuration-split platform Parking-approximately 400 space parking ramp northeast of station platforms built on existing surface lot or 400 space parking ramp north- west of station platforms Transit connections-Metro Orange Line (proposed) and I-35E BRT (pro- posed) 44 Downtown Lakeville Station: Platform configuration-split platform Parking-existing surface lot north of station platforms, though cur- rent level of use is unknown; alternatively 250 space parking ramp next to railroad right-of-way on east side Transit connections-none Alternate location-Holyoke Avenue & 215th Street Northfield Station: Platform configuration-split platform Parking-approximately 120 space parking lot between 2nd Street and 3rd Street on east side of railroad right-of-way Transit connections-Hiawathaland Transit 45 The Dan Patch Corridor would have approximately 2,800 park & ride spaces. This is partly based on station designs from the 2001 Dan Patch Corridor Feasibility Study. Although parking ramps are expensive to build, land is conserved while providing enough parking capacity for demand. In addition some of the park & ride facilities would be shared use with other transit routes. Parking constraints would likely exist at the Normandale Lake District Station due to the limited amount of undeveloped land avail- able and the surrounding terrain makes building a park & ride facility difficult. There is also the possibility that during the winter people go- ing to Hyland Ski and Snowboard Area would take advantage of the park & ride facility, so enforcement may be needed to ensure that only transit users are using the park & ride facility while people going to Hy- land Ski and Snowboard Area use designated parking areas. One rea- son why there is a station just to the north of Normandale Lake District Station at Atwood is due to the potential for parking constraints. It is optimal that riders from southern Edina would park at Atwood rather than Normandale Lake District in order to relieve pressure off the park & ride lot at Normandale Lake District. Most stations will have a possibility of riders using local streets for parking. While a small number of people doing this should not be an issue, if it gets to the point where local residents cannot park on lo- cal streets then enforcement is needed. 46 CHAPTER 9 Next Steps -Either repeal the Dan Patch Corridor legislative ban or consider it void due to referring to the proposal of commuter rail and not regional rail on the Dan Patch Corridor. -Once funding is achieved begin a new comprehensive study of the Dan Patch Corridor including cost/benefit analysis. -If results from the new comprehensive study conclude that the Dan Patch Corridor is worth the investment go into further engineering study. -Consult with stakeholders including communities, railroad compa- nies, and counties on project. -Consult with Minneapolis about land use planning in Basset Creek and Linden Yards area. Rail transportation and development plans may conflict. -The I-35 Corridor (consisting of the Dan Patch Corridor and/or Spine Line) is a Phase I project: “Projects that are within a 0–20 year imple- mentation horizon” (2015 State Rail Plan). -Consider new regional rail hub for Minneapolis either replacing Tar- get Field Station or in addition to. Due to the constricted right-of-way at Target Field Station there cannot be heavy frequency of regional trains. A new station would likely not be required after construction of the Dan Patch Corridor, but if/when more regional rail corridors are established. 48 CHAPTER 10 Sources Sources used in this study. 1. “2016 Legislative Priorities.” City of Lakeville. 4 January 2016. Web. 2. “Dan Patch Corridor Commuter Rail Feasibility Study.” Parsons Brinckerhoff. Minnesota Department of Transportation, 28 December 2001. Web. 3. Ecklund, Eric. “Re: Dan Patch Corridor.” Message to James Hovland. 1 February 2016. E-mail. 4. Ecklund, Eric. “Re: Dan Patch Corridor.” Message to Karl Keel. 9 March 2015. E-mail. 5. Ecklund, Eric. “Re: Dan Patch Corridor.” Message to Elizabeth Kautz. 1 February 2016. E-mail. 6. “Lake Marion Greenway Master Plan.” Dakota County. 20 August 2013. Web. 7. “Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan.” Minnesota Department of Transportation. February 2010. Web. 8. “Minnesota Motor Vehicle Crash Facts 2015.” Minnesota Department of Public Safety. June 2016. Web. 9. “Minnesota State Rail Plan Draft.” Minnesota Department of Transportation. March 2015. Web. 10. n.a. “TEX Rail orders Stadler Flirt DMUs.” Railway Gazette. 11 June 2015. Web. 11. n.a. “Twin Cities light-rail tragedies raise safety alarms.” Pioneer Press. 18 December 2015. Web. 12. n.a. “Man Struck and Killed by Northstar Commuter Train.” The Associated Press. 20 January 2014. Web. 13. “Request for City Council Committee Action from the Department of Community Planning and Economic Development.” City of Minneapolis. 18 January 2011. Web. 14. “SMART Train & Pathway Project Overview.” Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit. February 2016. Web. 15. Stadler. “Stadler Rail wins contract for 33 trains in Sweden.” Stadler Rail Group. 19 June 2015. Web. 16. “Twin Cities Area Freight Railroad Map.” Minnesota Department of Transportation. January 2015. Web. 17. Unknown photographer. “A Dan Patch Railway train, circa 1915.” 1915. Photograph. Wikipedia. Web. 50 51 Concluded From:Ross PlaetzerTo:James Hovland; "mail@EdinaMN.gov"; "kstaunton@EdinaMN.gov"; "rstewart@EdinaMN.gov"; Mary Brindle; Ann Swenson Subject:Staking out seating for July 4th paradeDate:Friday, July 08, 2016 3:46:27 PM Mayor Hovland and Council Members, For whatever reason this year, parade goers staked out prime seating earlier that I’ve ever seen for this year’s Fourth of July Parade on Monday. Many prime seating areas had been staked out by noon on Saturday, two days before the event. While early claims on location are probably in our American blood, dating back to the Sooners and the Boomers of the 19th century, unregulated, unofficial seat reserving done days before the event raises several issues that may merit review. First, it looks tacky to see blankets, chairs, towels and the like strewn along 50th street, a busy road, for several days. Second, it interferes with pedestrian and bicycle use of the sidewalks. Third, it creates a situation where each year, seat stakers will make their claims earlier and earlier than the year before. It is possible that for next year’s parade, which will fall on a Tuesday, claim stakers will set up chairs, etc. on Saturday, three days before the event. Several cities have addressed unregulated seat claiming by imposing reasonable time restrictions. Three cities’ rules are set out below. The parade is a great community event and is drawing more and more viewers each year. For that reason alone, some reasonable regulations may be a wise route. (Full disclosure—I’m not really a parade goer. I watched some of the early parades, in 1991 and 1992, when about 200 people total watched the parade. I marched in the 1997 parade with the Edina Basketball Association, and I’ve seen about 3-4 parades in the last 19 years. So, this is not a personal issue with me.) ROSS PLAETZER | 4058 SUNNYSIDE ROAD | CELL: 612.991.8896 Huntington Beach, CA— 12.32.015 Fourth of July Parade Viewing A. No person shall place on any public property, furniture, stakes, rope, ribbon, signs or any other item used to reserve areas for parade viewing before 7:00 a.m. on July 3rd.B. No materials used to reserve areas of public property shall block or interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic, or block those portions of sidewalks and streets used for the same prior to 6:00 a.m. on July 4th.C. Adhesive material, including adhesive tape, is prohibited for use in reserving space for parade viewing. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, the use of tape or other adhesives on trees, poles and signs.D. No person shall sell, lease, or rent any seat or space on public property.E. No person may use any area of public property so as to interfere with any person’s viewing of the parade from a City authorized and approved grandstand.F. All materials used to designate a private viewing area as described in this section shall be removed by 3:00 p.m. on July 4th. http://www.qcode.us/codes/huntingtonbeach/ Provo, Utah— Spectators may “stake out” their claim to a spot along University Avenue no earlier than July 3, at 3:00pm per Provo City Ordinance. All other portions of the parade route cannot be claimed or reserved until July 4, at 5:00 am. This includes trying to “reserve or occupy, or attempt to claim, reserve or occupy, either in person or by the placement of ropes, tents, chairs, sleeping bags, blankets, or other devices or barriers, any public property as a position for observing [the] public parade.” Please note that in order to reserve a spot on the parade route at least one person must be present. Any items left unattended may be moved. Provo, Utah code— 9.14.220. Public Parade Regulations. (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to claim, reserve or occupy, or to attempt to claim, reserve or occupy, either in person or by the placement of ropes, tents, chairs, sleeping bags, blankets, or other devices or barriers, any public property as a position for observing a public parade: (a) along University Avenue before 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to a public parade, or (b) along any other public street before 5:00 a.m. on the day of a public parade. (c) Along University Avenue after 3:00 p.m. on the day prior to a public parade, until the conclusion of the public parade, a person may occupy a position on public property for the purpose of watching a public parade and may, by the placement of ropes, tents, chairs, sleeping bags, blankets, or other devices or barriers, claim or reserve or attempt to claim or reserve any public property as a position for observing the public parade. (d) Along any public street other than University Avenue after 5:00 a.m. on the day of a public property as a position for observing the public parade. (e) Along any public street other than University Avenue after 5:00 a.m. on the day of a public parade, until the conclusion of the public parade, a person may occupy a position on public property for the purpose of watching a public parade and may, by the placement of ropes, tents, chairs, sleeping bags, blankets, or other devices or barriers, claim or reserve or attempt to claim or reserve any public property as a position for observing the public parade. (2) Items such as ropes, tents, chairs, sleeping bags, blankets, or other devices or barriers, used to claim or reserve or to attempt to claim or reserve any public property as a position for observing the public parade shall be attended at all times by a person who owns or controls the items. If the items are not physically attended by such a person, the items may be deemed to be abandoned property and may be removed from the public property by a law enforcement officer. (3) This Section shall not allow any person to occupy a position on a public street, to obstruct public sidewalks, or to occupy any unsafe position or any position which may cause damage to public or private property. (4) After 8:00 p.m. on the day before a public parade and continuing until the conclusion of the public parade, it shall be unlawful to park a motor vehicle on a public street which will be used as the parade route. A motor vehicle parked in violation of this subsection shall be considered a public nuisance and may be towed from the public street. (5) This Section shall not prevent Provo City, or any organization or person authorized to conduct and organize a public parade, from reserving places on public property for the observation of said parade, or from erecting and controlling seating on public property for the observation of said parade. http://www.codepublishing.com/UT/Provo/ Pasadena, CA— 3.12.180 - Obstructions in streets. A. No boxes shall be placed, used or stored on public property or on the roadway between curbs, for the purpose of viewing the Tournament of Roses Parade. B. No structure or device used for viewing, photographing or broadcasting the Tournament shall be used in an unsafe manner, nor in such a way as to interfere unreasonably with any person viewing the Tournament. C. No chair or structure, for the purpose of viewing the Tournament, shall be placed on public property prior to 12 noon on the day before the Tournament, nor shall any chair or structure, for the purpose of viewing the Tournament, be placed on any roadway between curbs on the parade route prior to 12:01 a.m. on the day of the Tournament. D. No chair or other structure shall be left or stored on public property in violation of this chapter. E. The use of, or occupancy of, any chair or structure, for viewing the Tournament, shall be at the sole risk of the owner or occupant of same. https://www.municode.com/library/ca/pasadena/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT3CIEVFA_CH3.12TORORA_3.12.180OBST From:Unlocking Young Minds Charity To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Robert Stewart; MJ Lamon Subject:Fundraiser Invite Date:Friday, July 08, 2016 4:21:34 PM Hello Edina City Council Members, This summer, I and a couple fellow Edina High School students created a non-profit organization called Unlocking Young Minds (UYM). Our mission is to bring educational resources to underprivileged children in developing countries. We have partnered with Edina Community Foundation to gain the 501(c)(3) status. This Sunday, from 1:00 pm to 8:30 pm, we will be hosting our first fundraiser at Rosland Park. We would like to invite you to our fundraiser to support our cause. There will be live music, food (pizza, ice-cream, cookies, and drinks), and fun games. We would truly appreciate it if you came to our fundraiser to support our cause. Thank you, Prasoon Sinha and the UYM Staff. From:Mark Kuck To:superintendent@edinaschools.org Cc:James Hovland; Cary Teague Subject:HIgh School construction; landscaping Date:Friday, July 08, 2016 5:55:44 PM Dear Dr. Dressen My name is Mark Kuck and I live next to Edina High School. I spoke with you during the bonding meetings regarding the need for pine trees and appropriate landscaping between the road and the homes on the west side of the High School. You agreed that this would be appropriate to shield your neighbors from the inevitable increased traffic, noise and other pollution that will result from the building additions and larger parking lot. I asked the Planning Commission if they agreed, and they did. My understanding is that they required that the School District put appropriate landscaping between the road and the neighborhood. I would appreciate your confirmation of this. I would also appreciate it if you would provide some information regarding the planned landscaping prior to the installation. I noticed that the road behind our home has been removed at the construction site. I would also appreciate your confirmation that the road will not be moved west in any measure, as for my understanding this was not reflected on the plan that was distributed, and this would exacerbate the nuisance issue arising from the road placement immediately above our property. We are tolerating the dirt and noise emanating from the construction site from before 7:00 AM and until 7:00 PM (or later) and on the weekends. Our windows are closed. While we understand the District's desire to get as much done in the summer as possible, we would appreciate your consideration of your neighbors and limiting the early, late and weekend construction activity to the greatest extent possible. We understand that the City can implement additional restrictions when there is heavy construction in residential areas, and it is not clear to me why these types of restrictions were not imposed on this project. I look forward to your response. Kind regards Mark Kuck The Kucks markkuck@msn.com From:Amy Lay To:Lay Amy Blount Subject:Minnesota Mayors - Please help us end the violence! Date:Saturday, July 09, 2016 7:12:04 PM Dear Mayor, First, I want to acknowledge my appreciation for the important work police officers do in our communities nationwide. I am personally thankful for quick acting police officers who have helped me and my family in the past. It is not these officers that I am writing about to you today, instead, it is the few that act out of extreme predudice and drag entire departments and communities down via thier deplorable actions. As a mother and concerned citizen I am inquiring about what steps your city is taking to end police brutality and deadly force against its Black citizens? The cycle of violence is completely out of control and needs to stop! As a mother I am urging you to implement the “Limit Use of Force” outlined by Campaign Zero. By implementing these proven policies your police department will be taking the appropriate steps to insure their mission to protect and preserve life. Please act now and encourage your fellow officals to do the same. Sincerely, Amy Blount Lay From:Belz, Adam To:James Hovland Subject:affordable housing interview Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 7:41:16 AM Hi Mayor, I’m a reporter at the Star Tribune and I’m writing some stories about how a shortage of affordable housing in wealthier suburbs is an obstacle to upward economic mobility for the poor in this Twin Cities metro area. I would like to get some candid perspective from you on what the obstacles are to building more affordable housing, what effect the heat in the rental market is having, and whatever else you think is pertinent. Do you have time to chat later today? Adam Adam Belz | Economy Reporter | Star Tribune | Desk: 612-673-4405 From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail Cc:Janet Canton Subject:FW: Bad Idea: Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 8:21:12 AM Attachments:image003.png Please include in City Council Correspondence Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Peter and Sara Ribbens [mailto:psribbens@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 12:07 PMTo: Ann KattrehCc: 'Sara Ribbens'Subject: Bad Idea: Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area As people who live in close proximity to this project, Bruce Freeman has a "Letter to the Editor" in SUN CURRENT EDINA paper (Thursday, July 7, 2016). Bruce Freeman's letter to the editor touches on four major points why this is a BAD IDEA. He’s said it so much better than we can. For us, the most compelling point against comes to this, we have great cross country skiing at Highland Park. So Edina is going to go into competition with this facility? Also, children are tubing and sledding down the existing hills with no problem, and walking back up, for FREE. Even us Grandparents are able to walk up the hill. We may be far enough away that, in the winter, the noise and fuss won’t affect us. Yet, I can imagine how a lit trail and artificial snow drift on to Gleason Avenue are going to be a major sources of frustration for those living close by. This project plans to spend 3 million dollars, with no clear return on investment, or any return in the five years after completion. As others have said, don't we have better, higher priorities? Yes. We could go on about the waste of water to make snow, the number of warm winters we continue to experience, the tree’s cut down to make way for these 50’ XC trails... We disagree whole heartedly with every aspect from conception, justification, and implementation of Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area. Sincerely Peter & Sara Ribbens 7216 Schey Drive, Edina MN. From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail Cc:Janet Canton Subject:FW: Braemar Park Winter Recreation Area Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 8:34:17 AM Please include in the City Council Correspondence Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390 AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- From: Robert Nazarian [mailto:rhnazarian@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2016 6:30 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Braemar Park Winter Recreation Area Thank you for providing an opportunity to comment on the above referenced proposal. 1. I would consider supporting any project that addresses the alarming deterioration of the wooded area east of the Clunie nine along Gleason Road. This former oak forest has been invested by invasive buckthorn, which the Parks Department has apparently seen fit to ignore. Are you planning to address the buckthorn infestation of this and other parks as part of this or some other project? 2. I am unable to comment intelligently on the financial feasibility of the tubing hill and cross country ski trails without seeing the detailed assumptions and financial analysis. Having said that, in my forty years as a financial executive, I have seen many proposals where the assumptions were massaged to get to the desired result. I'm concerned this might be another such example. 3. I am concerned by the impact this project might have on an otherwise quiet residential area. By its nature, golf is a quiet pastime and a good neighbor. A lighted tubing hill will no doubt generate both light and noise pollution, the latter coming from snow making, grooming and users. What are the proposed times for opening hours, grooming and snow making? I would not want to be a neighbor on Gleason Road if any of these activities were to run past 8:00 PM. 4. I believe I understand the sense of urgency relative to planning for necessary utilities in the context of the golf course renovation. Nevertheless, it feels like we are being forced into a decision with significant one time and ongoing financial consequences without adequate time for analysis and debate. I would rather consider a small investment in utilities to preserve the option for this project if and when it is approved after proper review. 5. For the record, unlike many of my neighbors, I do not think the money would be better spent on sidewalks. Bob Nazarian rhnazarian@comcast.net 5800 Long Brake Trail 612-790-1481 Sent from my iPad From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail Cc:Janet Canton Subject:FW: Questions and Feedback on Braemar Park Winter Rec Area Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 8:46:16 AM Attachments:image003.png Please include in City Council Correspondence Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Heather Bennett [mailto:dubesbennett@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2016 1:55 PMTo: Ann KattrehCc: Doug BennettSubject: Questions and Feedback on Braemar Park Winter Rec Area Ann- We may not be able to attend the open house and wanted to provide feedback on this proposed plan. As we are within walking distance, our family of 6 regularly use Braemar park year round in its current state: golf in the summer sledding on the hole 21 hill in the winter year-round walking/hiking on the bluff trails on the east side of the park - we walk on those trails 200-250 days each year Overall, we have mixed feelings about this plan. On one hand, we are very supportive of utilizing this parkland year round. In fact, we have commented several times that the best improvement is the groomed snow trails that were introduced a few years ago. We walk/run/hike/snowshoe with and without our dog on those trails all the time. Further improvements of these trails is a positive for us if it can be cost effective for non-skivers and non-bikers. On the other hand, we have real concerns about the proposed plan. First and foremost, we are very concerned that existing parkland trails that we regularly use will now have a usage fee associated with it. What will it cost to now utilize the trails because of the man-made snow and lights? What is the reality of time restrictions for using the trail because of the high school skiing team and other groups that will have regular practices and competitions? We also don't need lights to enjoy those existing trails - in fact is quite peaceful to walk through Braemar at night in the winter. Why can't the high school ski team use the existing man-made snow trails at hyland park reserve that is less than 3 miles from Braemar? We are strongly opposed to the groomed tubing hill for several reasons: First, the groomed tubing hill moves a great free resource that can be used at leisure into yet another expensive outing type experience. Why should we have to pay on a per use basis for a resource that we currently use for no incremental fees beyond our taxes? Kids have been tubing/sledding on that hill for many,many years and it already is a great resource. It is also an activity that is great because it is spontaneous. It snows and our kids want to go to the hill. If it is too crowded we come back another time. We don't need a reservation for a defined time and we aren't limited by a 2 hour window to utilize the resource....and we certainly don't have to decide is this worth $50-75-100 for our family to go enjoy the snow. We go to Buck Hill or Elm Creek 1 time a year, because it is $90 for our family. Second, the tubing lift also discourages the exercise provided by walking up the hill. This an excellent unstructured physical activity for our kids where they get great exercise - why ruin it by grooming lanes and hoisting them up the hill mechanically? Third, the lights will be a nuisance for the neighborhood on the tubing hill - We live 1/2 west of Lewis Park and deal with lights for football games all fall season and even the hockey lights that are 1/4 mile from our house. I would not want to live on Gleason road with those lights on constantly for 3 months a year. Finally, traffic and parking will likely be an issue if you create a groomed tubing hill - there is already plenty of traffic around that area because of the hockey rinks, edina dome, and golf dome. In summary, we can be supportive of the groomed multi-use trails if it can continue to be cost effective for hiking/walking. We are completely against the groomed tubing hill and encourage the Parks Department and City Council to separate these two decisions. We would be happy to discuss this live and can be reached @ 952.693.3594. Sincerely, Heather and Doug Bennett 5708 Kemrich Drive From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail Cc:Janet Canton Subject:FW: Braemar proposal Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 9:13:12 AM Please include in City Council Correspondence Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390 AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- From: Kelley Lange [mailto:kelley@usinternet.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 4:04 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Braemar proposal Hello, As an Edina resident with children we would definitely use a tubing hill and Nordic ski trails along with walking trails. I'm very excited about these proposals and hope they come to fruition. Thank you Kelley Sent from my iPad From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail Cc:Janet Canton Subject:FW: quick note about the recent Braemar letter Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 9:36:44 AM Attachments:image003.png Please include in City Council Correspondence Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Lisa Hengel [mailto:lthengel@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 11:58 AMTo: Ann KattrehSubject: quick note about the recent Braemar letter Hi Ann - I received the letter today about the possibly upcoming changes to Braemar golf course - it sounds very exciting! I just wanted to call attention to the use of the very outdated term "mad-made" - I believe the correct modern-day term is "artificial" (as there very well may be women working on making the artificial snow trails). Thank you and have a great day! Lisa From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail Cc:Janet Canton Subject:FW: Braemar Winter Rec Area Feedback Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 9:52:34 AM Attachments:image003.png Please include in City Council Correspondence Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Grant Braasch [mailto:grant_braasch@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 1:18 PMTo: Ann KattrehSubject: Braemar Winter Rec Area Feedback Ann,I’ve received and read some of the information regarding the proposed winter recreation area at Braemar and I wanted to provide some feedback. I’m an avid xc skier and cyclist so the project is very interesting to me as an Edina resident who lives near Braemar. I race the Birkebeiner and City of Lakes Loppet every year and I utilize the trails at Hyland and Edina High School multiple times every week. A trail at Braemar would add another great local skiing option. As a cyclist who races in the summer and on fat bikes in the winter, I also really support the idea of fat bikes having access as long as there are separate trails for fat bikes and skiers. - I think the xc ski area is a good idea and think it’s critical that extended natural snow trails are a key element of the overall project. The 2.5k man-made snow loop is good but with a much longer snowmaking loop available at Hyland, there needs to be the option for a longer loop available to attract skiers. - I don’t recall where I saw the proposed fee structure for users but I recall it being in the $75 - $100 range for a ski pass. Considering most local skiers are accustomed to $65 for a Three Rivers season pass which provides access to 10 different ski areas or $50 for a City of Mpls pass for 5 different trails, $65 may seem steep for access to one small area. Personally, that would be my biggest reason for not utilizing the area if it were developed.- The other big concern I have is that considering how fortunate (spoiled) we are in the southern metro area to have world class cross country skiing available just 5 minutes away at Hyland with 5k of beautiful lighted manmade snow trails, attracting skiers may be somewhat challenging. I can see it being a great option for high schools but for regular citizen racers and recreational skiers, they may prefer to continue skiing at Hyland even if Braemar is developed.- I also like the tubing hill proposal. Our kids are 9 and 11 but I could still see us taking advantage of the tubing hill as a family throughout their teen years. The other comments I want to make are around cycling. I see that fat biking is included as a possible use of the trails but it’s not clear to me if mixed use would be allowed where cyclists and skiers would allowed on the same trails. That seems like a bad idea. However, grooming separate fat bike trails on Braemar would be fantastic. Summer mountain biking is the issue that I feel more strongly about and I realize that may be somewhat out of the scope of this project. I regularly incorporate the gravel trail on the Braemar ridge as part of my normal bike rides multiple times every week. I know there have been proposals in the past to develop single track trails on this hill but I don’t believe they’ve ever gotten very far. If you’re familiar with the local mountain bike trail organization, MORC (Minnesota Off-Road Cyclists), you know they are amazing stewards of the land and build and maintain sustainable trails through volunteer efforts. As you are probably well aware, the trail currently running along the Braemar ridge is in no way sustainable and requires significant maintenance by the city. Every time we have a significant rainfall, the trails that are cut straight up and down the fall lines are washed out, gullied and rutted by water flowing downhill. Properly designed mountain bike trails are never cut straight up and down fall lines like this and are designed to withstand heavy rain with no damage or wash out. Allowing MORC to build and maintain sustainable trails would be a major improvement to that area and would seemingly reduce costs and work for the city as they wouldn’t have to continue repairing a very poorly designed trail. All maintenance is handled by volunteer crews organized by MORC but in cooperation with the land owner. It would also be a perfect complement to the proposed year round Braemar recreation area. You may be aware that most of the local MORC maintained mountain bike trails are also open for fat bikes in the winter so that would be another great use of single track at Braemar if those trails could be open to fat bikers in the winter. However, looking at the ski trail proposals, that might be somewhat challenging as the bike trails would probably have to cross the ski trails at multiple points. Thanks, Grant Braasch From:Pritchard, Claire Subject:Update on Metropolitan Council Reform Efforts Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 10:23:39 AM Attachments:Update to Mayors and Council Members.pdfAdoptee List- Principles on Metropolitan Council Reform.pdfMetropolitan Governance Reform Principles.pdf Good morning, I am passing on the attached letter updating metro-area cities on Metropolitan Council reform efforts. I am also including the letter’s two attachments. Regards, Claire PritchardAssistant to the County ManagerDakota County Administration651.438.4540 July 11, 2016 Mayors and Council Members: For many years, both cities and counties have been working toward reform of the Metropolitan Council. In 2010 and 2011, all seven metropolitan counties, as well as Metro Cities, put together working groups to make recommendations regarding regional governance. While the approaches and recommendations of these two groups have differed, there has been a very persistent and consistent message that reform of the Metropolitan Council is both needed and appropriate. Over the past year, the suburban counties have been working toward establishing a more inclusive group representing cities and counties who reflect the growing consensus that change is overdue. This group has taken a strong position that local control must be a key element of any reform. Towards that end, we wanted to update you on the progress that has been made and the work that remains, and to encourage you to stay engaged in this very important topic. A coalition of local (city and county) government leaders developed a draft resolution, eventually passed by 41 cities and four suburban counties (list attached), supporting reform of the Council. These resolutions set forth principles to guide the process of moving away from our current state-agency/governor-controlled Council to one that provides for local control. Despite the rather chaotic end to the Legislative Session there has been progress regarding the reform movement. Local governments and other stakeholders, working with Legislators, have finally managed to move reform of the Metropolitan Council from the back burner; reform is now being considered and debated seriously within the region, the media, and at the capital. The idea that some type of modification is absolutely necessary is now an accepted and consensus position of nearly every group. Even Governor Dayton and Metropolitan Council Chair Adam Duininck have indicated that they are open to suggestions regarding reform. Now that there is consensus that change is needed, we must begin the more difficult process of finding consensus on exactly what this change will look like. While there is agreement that change is needed, the changes being proposed by others differ substantially from ours– we argue that meaningful reform can only come with local control (local elected officials), while others advocate for minor adjustments that continue the status quo state agency model of governance. It is imperative that over the coming months we expand the coalition of local governments to include business groups, civic organizations, governmental associations, environmental and parks advocates, good government organizations, and others to build consensus in defining a new structure for the Metropolitan Council. We thank all of you for your continued attention to this issue, and we strongly encourage you to continue to be engaged in this important initiative through the coalition of local governments and the various other organizations that are pursuing Council reform. We will be in touch soon with more information and further updates on our efforts. Sincerely, Rhonda Sivarajah Anoka County Board of Commissioners Matt Look Anoka County Board of Commissioners Scott Schulte Anoka County Board of Commissioners Randy Maluchnik Carver County Board of Commissioners Tom Workman Carver County Board of Commissioners Nancy Schouweiler Dakota County Board of Commissioners Liz Workman Dakota County Board of Commissioners Chris Gerlach Dakota County Board of Commissioners Mike Beard Scott County Board of Commissioners Jon Ulrich Scott County Board of Commissioners Enclosures: 2 *Modified Principles adopted **No official resolution was passed, but a letter supporting the Principles was signed by the majority of City Councilmembers and the Mayor Principles on Metropolitan Council Reform: List of Adoptees (as of July 11, 2016) Cities Andover Bethel Blaine Centerville Chanhassen Chaska Coates Cologne Columbus Crystal** Elko New Market Farmington Forest Lake Greenwood Ham Lake Hamburg Hampton Jordan Lino Lakes Loretto Mayer Mendota Heights Mound New Germany New Prague Norwood Young America Nowthen Oak Grove Plymouth* Prior Lake Ramsey* Shakopee St. Bonifacius St. Francis Victoria Watertown Counties Anoka Carver Dakota Scott Metropolitan Governance Reform Twin Cities’ Local Government Coalition -Statement of Objectives- A coalition of local governments throughout the metropolitan area has joined together to develop a position statement and a set of principles for improving metropolitan governance in the Twin Cities. The Coalition supports the need for regional planning, collaboration and coordination, but seeks to expand local government representation on the Metropolitan Council. The Coalition’s objectives for its collective effort to improved governance are: 1. To articulate a vision of responsive and effective metropolitan governance—as represented by a Statement of Belief and Principles for Reform of the Metropolitan Council 2. To align local government interests behind a reform effort—through formation of a broad coalition of metropolitan Cities and Counties —and a common position. 3. To be prepared for any efforts—legislative and otherwise—to reform the governance structure and functioning of the Metropolitan Council. Attached is the Coalition’s Statement of Belief and Principles for Reform. 2 Twin Cities’ Local Government Coalition Principles for Metropolitan Council Reform The following principles were developed by a coalition of cities and counties in the metropolitan area, a coalition created to advocate for reform of the Metropolitan Council. The group believes that an effective Metropolitan Council should reflect the following principles, which were developed based on the group’s core Statement of Belief (printed below). STATEMENT OF BELIEF: The Metropolitan Council, due to its taxing and policy authority, should be accountable to a regional constituency of those impacted by its decisions. It should not operate as a state agency—as it does in its current form—answerable to only one person, the Governor. Principles for Metropolitan Council Reform: I. A majority of the members of the Metropolitan Council shall be elected officials, appointed from cities and counties within the region. II. Metropolitan cities shall directly control the appointment process for city representatives to the Metropolitan Council. III. Metropolitan counties shall directly appoint their own representatives to the Metropolitan Council. IV. The terms of office for any Metropolitan Council members appointed by the Governor shall be staggered and not coterminous with the Governor. V. Membership on the Metropolitan Council shall include representation from every metropolitan county government. VI. The Metropolitan Council shall represent the entire region, therefore voting shall be structured based on population and incorporate a system of checks and balances. 3 Background and Justification of Position The Metropolitan Council was created to provide for the orderly and economic development of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. It has the responsibility and authority to guide the region’s growth and to provide important regional services. The Counties of Anoka, Carver, Dakota, and Scott support the concept of a regional approach, and have no wish to abolish the Council or diminish the importance of regional collaboration. However, the Council’s management of growth, and in particular the coordination and delivery of regional services has changed dramatically. At the same time, the role of counties has evolved. Increasingly, Counties have undertaken direct provision of regional services including: hazardous and solid waste management, transit funding and transitway development, regional parks, regional highways, water resources planning and watershed management, greenway and bikeway development, farmland and open space preservation, the regional library system, fiber communications networks, and the 800 MHz radio network. The Council’s recent focus on reducing poverty and disparities makes it even more essential that within the governance structure there is understanding and improved coordination with county programs--- which exclusively provide economic assistance, social services, workforce development/employment, counseling, public health, nutrition and family “home visiting” services, workforce and specialized housing programs and many other anti-poverty and human services. In these and many other circumstances, the State, Metropolitan Council and city governments have all looked to counties to provide both the financial and political leadership needed to address key regional issues. Thus, while a strong regional approach is necessary for many issues, it is necessary for the regional governing body to feature strong county representation, as well as representation from other local elected officials. Currently, the members of the Council are non-elected individuals answerable only to the Governor, an office that has often been elected without majority support from metropolitan-area voters. The Council, which has the ability to levy taxes on metropolitan-area residents, should be answerable to the citizens and taxpayers of the area it represents rather than a single officeholder. The best way to ensure that the interests of citizens of the metropolitan-area are represented is to have a preponderance of locally elected officials on the Council--individuals that do not serve exclusively at the pleasure of the Governor. This will have the added benefit of allowing the Council to meet federal guidelines to serve as the region’s Metropolitan Planning Organization, a move encouraged by Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Federal Highway Administration (FHA) to make the Council “more directly accountable to its public1.” Regional governance is vital to the metropolitan area’s continued success. However, in order for a regional body to be effective it must be credible, meaning that regional citizens must feel that the body effectively represents their goals and values. Citizens currently feel disconnected from the Metropolitan Council, preventing it from functioning as an effective regional governance body. The coalition of suburban counties is working to join the Metropolitan Council with the people it represents, so the region as a whole can unite for continued growth and prosperity. 1 Letter from representatives of FTA and FHA to Ann R. Goering of Ratwik, Roszak, & Maloney, P.A., Aug. 3 2015 From:michaelrcashman@gmail.com To:Edina Mail; Ann Kattreh Subject:Braemar Park Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 12:12:10 PM Attachments:Braemar Park Plan - 2728601_1.PDF Hi, I am sending the attaches letter for your consideration. Thanks for all the great work and service. I hope my comments and input are helpful. MICHAEL R. CASHMAN 5820 Vernon Lane, Edina MN 55436 Cell: 612-619-2783 Email : m ichaelrcasliman@ gmai l.com July 11,2016 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Council Members Park Board Director Ann Kattreh Edina Park Board Members Re Development of V/alking, Biking, Nature Trails and Habitats Around Braemar Park Perimeter Dear Mayor Hovland, City Council Members, Director Kattreh and Park Board Members, I have lived in Edina for the last 20 years, and for a few years in the 1980's, on both the East and the West sides of town. During my time in Edina I have been a single person, married with young children, divorced with teenage children, and now married with (mostly) grown children. My children, wife and I have visited and used almost all (and perhaps every) City park and have participated in innumerable Park and Recreation sponsored programs of all different types. V/e have been and are frequent park users. We have also used many other City amenities. We participated in the 2006 and the 2014 Community Needs Assessment Surveys. I have read the Park, Recreation and Trail Strategic Plan, and Attachments. I try to follow City and Park Board initiatives, plans and developments. Our family has supported and voted for every City or School District Referendum seeking to improve City, Park Board and School District amenities, infrastructure and assets. We are strong supporters of all City and Park Board improvement initiatives, regardless of how much we might personally use those amenities. For example, we have supported the sidewalk construction initiative, the sport dome, the renovations at Pamela Park, and many others. We strongly support the proposed investment in a first-rate Community Center in the Grandview District with an Art Center, Auditorium for large event programming and other dearly needed City amenities such as an athletic facility, adult center, community theater programming and the like. These are the kind of initiatives that attract new residents, and generates growth and investment in our City. Edina should have Community Center facilities and amenities that are equal to or better than surrounding communities such as Chaska, Chanhassen, Bloomington, and Burnsville, to name a few that do have those facilities. The investment, while large, is well worth it because we are competing for residents and business with other communities, and need attractive amenities. Our family looks forward to seeing a first-rate Community Center built on the old public works site in the near future. In short, we are ardent Edina supporter in all respects, and look forward to using and enjoying the Park System and as many City amenities as possible for years to come. I feel that the City Council and Park Board have done a wonderful job in improving our City, and making it the most desirable place to live in Minnesota, especially over the last l0 years. The City Council and Park Board have done an incredible job in making a fine City even better. Because of the excellent work by the City Council and Park Board, and because I have agreed with and supported what has been done, I have never had occasion to write before. I am writing now to comment on the scope of currently approved renovations and proposals for future development at Braemar Park. The 2006 and 2014 Community Needs Assessments Surveys make it crystal clear that the number I priority of Edina residents has been and continues to be the development of more walking, biking and nature trails, and the development of natural habitats. These priorities are also reflected in the Strategic Plan. However, it appears that respondents believe their needs for walking, biking and nature trails were being met or satisfied less in 2014 than they were in 2006 (39% said their needs for walking and biking trails were being met in 2006, while only 25o/o believed those needs were being met in 2014;36Yo said their needs for nature trails were being met in 2006, while only 24%o said their needs for nature trails were being met in 2014). In shorl, it seems quite clear that the demand for walking trails, biking trails, nature trails, and natural habitats is not only the number one priority, but is greater now than ever before. At the same time, it appears those needs have not been given top priority. Those top priorities can be proactively addressed , in a very significant and substantial way, with some attention to detail in the scope of renovations that have been approved for Braemar Park generally and the golf course specifically. Accordingly, I respectfully urge the City Council and the Park Board to consider taking the following actions as part of the Braemar Park renovations (if they are not already included, which is not clear from the Park Board and City Council discussions on the topic, or the Richard Mandel Master Plan Option 5 that was approved): (l)complete eradication of buckthom and invasive species throughout ALL of Braemar Park, border to border and not just the golf course area, specifically including all of the East and West Hills (Parcels A and B) and along the southern border in the wetlands along Nine Mile Creek South Fork; enhance and better maintain the existing walking trails in the East and West Hills, and reconnect them on BOTH the south (along the Nine Mile Creek South Fork) and north sides (along Braemar Road and Hillary Lane) to create a continuous perimeter path around the entire Park consistent with the original design, with that perimeter path being connected to the and integrated with the internal paths proposed by Richard Mandell in Option 5 and connected to the Grand Round Trails such as the newly constructed trails on Valley View Road; and (2) (3)convert the "brush dump" on Valley View Road to a parking area to give another, better access point to residents who want to use the Braemar Park trials (the golf course parking lot does not have access to the East Hill trails, and the West Hill trails are unknown to the general public because the only parking is in the Metro Safety Facility parking lot; the "brush dump cuts-off the potential north side connection between the East and West Hills, and could be easily moved to an area adjacent to the public works area to the south of the Metro Safety Facility). I also comment briefly on the proposed winter activities proposal for Braemar Park. Improving the cross country skiing experience at Braemar Park is a very good idea. There should be a trail around the entire perimeter, connected to interior trails, but because walking, biking and nature 2 trails are the highest priority for all Edina residents, that perimeter trail must not displace or share walking, biking or nature trails anywhere in Braemar Park. A.THE GOLF COURSE RENOVATIONS AND RELATED DEVELOPMENT OF WALKING, BIKING AND NATURE TRAILS AND HABITATS AT BRAEMAR PARK. I have played Braemar Golf Course many times. I fully support the decision to fully renovate it, and return it to a first-rate l8 hole course. I am writing because the project provides an excellent opportunity to better utilize a vastly under-used and neglected Park Board asset for walking, biking and nature trails. When Braemar Golf Course was designed, Clifford French originally envisioned a bridle path for horses and walking path around the entire perimeter. In the 1960's, this area of Edina still had many farms. In fact, there was still an equestrian stable on Valley View Road near the current Edina High School site. There are remnants of the intended bridle path and walking trail in the East and West Hills. A walking path around Braemar Park was constructed, but the north end trail was eliminated. The south end trail along the Nine Mile Creek South Fork was severed when the Clunie Nine was built. The northern-most trail in the V/est Hills now dead-ends in the brush dump on Valley View Road. It is not possible to walk around the entire course on the north side without walking outside the Braemar Park perimeter on Braemar Road and Hillary Lane. A walker does not have access to a sidewalk until he or she reaches what is now the Academy Par 3. Obviously, this is less than desirable and not safe. Along the Nine Mile Creek South Fork the V/est Hills trail was diverted through the parking lots along West 78th Street when the Clunie Nine was built. A make-shift, poorly maintained "plastic path" takes pedestrians into parking lots along West 78th Street. Pedestrians are forced to walk through two parking lots along loading docks behind commercial buildings and then along V/est 78'n Street to reach the other end. The "parking lot paths" are not maintained at all by the Park Board. They are not marked. Pedestrians must go up and down three sets of steps, precluding bike use. Needless to say, this is not a safe or pleasant experience. The result is that few people use the trails in the East or West Hills, and almost nobody uses the trails from one end to the other. The East and West Hills and the trails have been badly neglected, and receive almost no maintenance. The East and West Hills are choked with buckthorn and other invasive species. The buckthom is so thick that it is impenetrable, and makes the paths dark and foreboding even on the sunniest days. The alternate trail along the ridge of the West Hills, where fantastic vistas can be had in all directions, is not maintained at all. It is badly overgrown with buckthorn. The main and subsidiary trails in the East Hills have deep ruts from washouts, and are also badly overgrown with buckthorn. The path along the south side of Braemar Park on the Nine Mile Creek South Fork is also badly infested with buckthorn. This is particularly so in the low lying areas on each side of the path that are the Nine Mile Creek South Fork flood zone. The buckthorn on the East and West Hills and along the Nine Mile Creek South Fork is so thick that there is no wind movement, and sunlight is severely restricted. I know because I walk these a-) trails frequently in all seasons. The thick buckthorn, neglect and lack of maintenance is discourages use of a beautiful nature area. Almost no one knows of these trails; I rarely see anyone walking there. It can be weeks between people sightings. Buckthorn removal, coupled with proper maintenance would re-introduce Braemar Park (not just Braemar Golf Course) as a tremendous natural asset to the City and park system. It would rival and surpass Bredesen Park as the premier nature trail and walking trail in Edina, both for exercise and fitness and as a natural habitat. (Anyone who has walked around Bredesen, or in the "nature area" inside, knows that it is also severely infested with buckthorn, badly compromising its "nature area" claim). The Renovation Plan Should Include Comprehensive Buckthorn and Invasive Species Removal in All of Braemar Park. Including the East and West Hills (Parcels A and B) and the South Boarder Alons the Nine Mile Creek South Fork. The Richard Mandell Master Plan for Ecological Management states on page 67 that the "Oak Woodland to the west and east of the golf course" (meaning Braemar Park Parcels A and B, not in the golf course area) will be restored "by removing invasive species such as buckthorn . . ." Does this mean that the Braemar Renovation Plan approved by the City Council will include the removal of ALL buckthorn on the hills in Braemar Park Parcels A (East) and B (West) - even though the East and West hills are not "on" the golf course? I hope so. If not, I urge the City Council and the Park Board to include COMPLETE buckthom and invasive species removal from ALL of Parcels A and B. Buckthorn and invasive species removal and Oak Savanna and Woodland Restoration is obviously a key element to the Mandell Renovation Plan. The 2006 and2014 Community Needs Assessment Surveys, as well as the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan make it clear that walking, biking and nature trails have been and still are the top priority for Edina residents. Walking and biking trails were identified as the greatest need (86%) and nature trails as the second greatest need (66%). They remain the two greatest needs in 2014 85%o and 690/o, respectively. The 2014 Survey shows that natural areas and habitats is the third greatest need (56%). The 2014 Survey also shows that these three needs are in the bottom third in the needs that are being satisfied. These findings all demonstrate that Edina still has a severe lack of walking, biking and nature trails. The 2006 Survey included a question on buckthorn, and showed l9%o of respondents thought it was a major problem in Edina parks, and that 38% thought it was a moderate problem - 57% in total. Aggressive buckthorn removal was supported by 72o/o of respondents - the action with the third highest level of support (walking and biding trails was first with 89%). The aggressive removal of buckthorn also received the third highest level of support amongst respondent in the 2006 Survey for the use of tax dollars (the development of walking and biding trails again receiving the most support). Buckthorn removal questions were curiously not included in the 2014 Survey. However, the Park and Recreation Strategic Plan makes it clear that buckthorn is a very serious problem, both environmentally and in terms of the quality and enjoyment of City parks. It is a high priority that goes hand in hand with the development of walking, biking and nature trails and habitats in Edina. 1 4 These priorities can be addressed and advanced with aggressive buckthorn eradication removal throughout Braemar Park, specifically including the East and West Hills and along the Nine Mile Creek South Fork, and the proper development and maintenance of those trails. Those trails do not require pavement, but can be established and maintained as natural trails for walkers and bikers who could fully enjoy nature in one of the few areas in Edina that have not been heavily developed. Buckthorn throughout Braemar Park, from border to border including the East and West Hills and along the Nine Mile Creek South Fork should be an essential component of the Golf Course Renovation Plan. It fulfills key and often stated desires by Edina park users. It is the environmentally correct action. It enhances the goals of the Golf Course Renovation Plan, and the desire to restore the Oak Woodland and Savanna habitat. If buckthorn eradication is not already included throughout Braemar Park, a change order should be issued to include it. Mandell is already going to be on the property, and the environment is going to be addressed. It would be a real shame - and a wasted opportunity - if buckthorn is not eradicated from Braemar Park when the equipment and resources are there to get the job done. 2. The Renovation Plan Should Include a Reconnection of The Walkins and Nature Trails in the East and West Hills on BOTH the North and South Sides of the Golf Course. The Richard Mandell Master Plan under "Other Considerations" on page 68 states that the goal was to "establish a trail network surrounding the park with significant safety buffers from golf playing areas." The Plan includes a couple of walking trails IN the golf course, but not around the perimeter of the Park. Specifically, the Plan does not reconnect the East and West Hills on the south side. This should be corrected. Users should no longer have to go through parking lots and along the busy West 78th Street to get from the East to the V/est trails. The issue is even more pronounced on the north side of the park. A trail connecting the East and West Hills should be created on the north side so that users can go all the way around that park and all the way around the golf course as originally designed. There are multiple ways this could be accomplished with a buffer from the traffic on Braemar Road and Hillary Lane and from golfers on the course. For example, a boardwalk similar to those being built through Edina as part of the Nine Mile Creek Project could be built through the marshy areas along Hillary Lane. Or, a path with a boulevard could be created along the road. Either would altract users who would be motivated to enjoy nature in walk or bike around all of Braemar Park, with access to the interior trails envisioned by the Plan. Reconnecting the East and West Hills, and then connecting them to the interior trails in the Renovation Plan, would make Braemar Park the premier walking, biking and nature trail experience in Edina. Because of its size, natural assets, seclusion from commercial and residential structures, and its varied and rolling topography, Braemar Park would quickly surpass Bredesen and the plans for Fred Richards as the best Edina has to offer. Creating a connection on the north side would have the added benefit of allowing a connection to the bike and walking trails the City has spent much time and money developing on Valley View 5 B. Road. The City obviously spent a great deal of time and money re-designing the Valley View and Braemar Road roundabout. Right now, that is a trail to nowhere. That investment could be maximized by connecting that trail to the Braemar Park trails on the north side. In this way, the Braemar Park trails could also be connected eventually to the Three Rivers Nine Mile Creek Trail. 3. Convefting the Valley View Road "Brush Dump" to Parking for BracnalPatk Trail Users. Currently, the City maintains a brush dump on Valley View Road. It interferes with the existing trails in the West Hills. It would inhibit the development of a trail around the perimeter of Braemar Park. It should be moved for that reason alone. But, it would also be a very useful location for trail head parking. There currently is no City parking for those who wish to access the trails in the West Hills or South Side of Braemar Park. The brush dump should be moved to another location, probably on the grounds of the equipment storage area to the south of the Metro Safety Facility. That area is already used for materials that are being excavated in the street renovation project, which are pulverized and removed from the grounds at the end of each season. That same procedure could be followed at the brush dump. THB PROPOSAL FOR LIGHTED CROSS COUNTRY SKI TRAILS AND SNOW TUBING FACILIITES IN THE BAST BRABMAR HILLS. I am aware of the current proposals for cross country skiing and snow tubing at Braemar Park. In general, these proposals seem to be at odds with the expressed priority of Edina residents for more walking, biking and nature trails and habitats. At a minimum, given the clear and repeated desire of respondents to Community Needs Assessments Surveys, both in 2006 and 2014, the development of nature, biking and nature trials and habitats should come first. Over the past 10 years the City and Park Board have built other projects which were low on the list of Survey priorities, such as an outdoor refrigerated rink and sport dome. It is clear that the walking, biking and nature trial priorities have not been fully satisfied for Edina residents, and should be prioritized. This fact is quite evident in the Surveys, since the development of walking, biking and nature trails continues to be an overwhelming priority. Residents seem to have indicated that those needs are being met less in 2014 than they were in 2006. Consequently, those needs should be clearly prioritized. In the context of these proposals, to the extent cross country trails and tubing projects are considered, they should be secondary to the development of a walking, biking and nature trail around the perimeter of Braemar Park, with removal of buckthorn and invasive species from border to border (see above). If ski trails are built they must not displace or encroach on walking, bike or nature trails and habitats anywhere in Braemar Park, including the East Hills where the ski trail is currently proposed. I have seen the 50-foot wide path that has been staked on the ridge in the East Hills, and it appears to clearly conflict with and displace the walking trail there. In fact, it is so wide it appears there is no room left for a walking, biking and nature trail along the ridge of the East Hills. A 50 foot wide trail is too wide - and would be rendered unnecessary if a ski trail is built around the perimeter of Braemar Park alongside a walking, biking and nature trail. Again, the 6 walking, biking and nature trail that I believe is essential must be for year-round use, and should not double as a cross-country trail in the winter. A one-way 70-20' perimeter cross country trail would be plenty wide enough to accommodate skate skiers and one or two classic cross country tracks. I am a cross country skier, and I believe a perimeter path, with access to the interior loops, would be more attractive to cross-country skiers than a2.5k out and back track. A first- rate grooming machine is the key ingredient for a good sross country skiing experience. (lf the current 50 foot wide out-and-back 2.5k plan is implemented, in addition to building another walking, biking and nature trail, this would be yet another opportunity to remove all buckthorn from the East Hills). Lighting a perimeter trail would be better than lighting an out-and-back 2.5k Irail in the East Hills. The former would likely reduce the number of lights needed in the East Hills and therefore reduce the impact on neighbors along Gleason Road. More importantly, though, lighting a perimeter path around Braemar Park on the walking, biking and nature trail would likely encourage more use year round. Another potential issue is the proposed use of the Braemar Club House for winter activities, specifically the Edina High School Nordic Ski Team and as a facility for renting cross country ski equipment if a cross country track is built. As I assume the Park Board knows, the Theodore Wirth Park, Theodore Wirth Golf Course and Theodore Wirth Club House in Minneapolis are all used for winter activities. The Wirth Club House is used as a chalet to accommodate Nordic skiers, like the winter recreation use being proposed for the Braemar Club House. The City of Minneapolis has commissioned an exhaustive study on the viability of its public courses, including the club houses. V/irth was identified as being particularly problematic because of the heavy wear and tear on the club house from winter use. The golf course and surrounding grounds also suffer greatly because of the increased demands and use for winter activities, with significant adverse results for the golf course operations. Using the Braemar Club House for winter sporl activities could have similar adverse effects, or at a minimum increase the costs of maintaining a profitable and enjoyable golf course experience. Another overarching consideration is whether the objective is to attract as many people from the region to Braemar in the winter as a money making venture. Braemar would be in direct competition with Buck Hill (tubing) and the Three Rivers Park District operations at Highland Hills (lighted cross country skiing) or Elm Creek (lighted cross country skiing and tubing). I have cross country skied at Highlands and at Elm Creek and at Wirth Park in Minneapolis many times. I have snow tubed with my kids at Buck Hill and Elm Creek countless times. It is great fun, but I know from personal experience the mob scene that exists - especially for tubing - on nice weekends. I do not think Braemar could handle the crowds that would surely materialize. The parking lot is not big enough, and the Club House would be a mad house. Given the opposition that existed for the Sports Dome near the high school, doming Kuhlman Field and other traffic generating proposals, it would be surprising if the Braemar Park neighbors were supportive of activities that will generate a substantially higher volume of traffic. 7 I hope these comments are helpful. I would be happy to discuss if there is interest Thank you and best regards, S y, chael R. Cashman t--.*^a 8 From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail Cc:Janet Canton Subject:Fwd: Support Winter Rec plan Date:Monday, July 11, 2016 9:44:47 PM Please add to City Council Correspondence. Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0385 AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov Begin forwarded message: From: Bill Sierks <wsierks@comcast.net>Date: July 7, 2016 at 10:21:12 PM CDT To: <akattreh@edinamn.gov>Subject: Support Winter Rec plan We support the City’s winter rec plan for Braemer. Thank you Bill Sierks & Mamie Segall 5713 Brook DriveEdina MN 55439 From:Peterson, Dan To:Edina Mail Subject:Greater MSP Agenda for Mayor Hovland Date:Tuesday, July 12, 2016 9:24:43 AM Attachments:GREATER MSP - Final AEDO Site Visit Itinerary July 12-13 2016.pdf Dan Peterson Technology Solutions Group Direct 952 897 7713 | Mobile 612 598 5581 Main 952 897 7700 | Fax 952 842 7713 dan.peterson@colliers.com twitter | LinkedIn | TSGmsp Colliers International | Minneapolis-St. Paul 4350 Baker Road | Suite 400 Minnetonka, MN 55343 | United States http://www.colliers.com/dan.peterson ®AEDO SITE VISIT ITINERARY CERTIFICATION AS AN ACCREDITED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION BY THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL SITE EVALUATORS • BARBARA HAYES | AEDO Past Chair, Davis, CA • DENNY COLEMAN | CEcD, FM, HLM, St. Louis, MO GREATER MSP EXECUTIVE TEAM • MICHAEL LANGLEY | CEO • CECILE BEDOR | Executive Vice President • DAVID GRIGGS | Vice President, Business Investment & Research • MIKE BROWN | Vice President, Marketing & Communications • PETER FROSCH | Vice President, Strategic Partnerships 7.11.16 - 7.13.16 MONDAY, JULY 11 INTERVIEW STAFF Business Investment and Research & Communication Teams. • DAVID GRIGGS | Vice President, Business Investment & Research • VAL VANNETT | Director, Research & Analysis • JOEL AKASON | Director, Business Investment • MEGAN BARNETT-LIVGARD | BR&E Manager / MN Medical Manufacturing Partnership (MMMP) Coordinator • MIKE BROWN | Vice President, Marketing & Communications • GITA SITARAMIAH | Director of Communications INTERVIEW STAFF CONTINUED Strategy & Communications Teams. • MATT LEWIS | Strategy Manager • TIFFANY ORTH | Make It. MSP. Coordinator • MIKE BROWN | Vice President, Marketing & Communications • VALERIE BRENNAN | Marketing Specialist9:45 AM *Peter Frosch is on vacation and will be unable to participate PAGE 1 TUESDAY, JULY 12 DENNY COLEMAN ARRIVAL AT MSP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TCT, Inc. will provide transportation. Driver will be holding a sign with Denny’s name in a public area. BARBARA HAYES ARRIVAL AT MSP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TCT, Inc. will provide transportation. Driver will be holding a sign with Barbara’s name in a public area. 11:55 AM 3:20 PM ACCOMMODATIONS THE SAINT PAUL HOTEL 350 Market Street Saint Paul, MN 55101 MEET IN THE SAINT PAUL HOTEL LOBBY Michael Langley & Cecile Bedor will meet Denny Coleman & Barbara Hayes in the lobby of the Saint Paul Hotel and escort them to the GREATER MSP office. WELCOME BREAKFAST AT GREATER MSP WITH GREATER MSP EXECUTIVE TEAM EVALUATION OF HOST ORGANIZATION • 9:45 to 10:00 Review office, equipment, facilities, etc. • CECILE BEDOR | Executive Vice President • MARY JO LEWIS | Office Manager • 10:00 to 10:30 Review internal operations • CECILE BEDOR | Executive Vice President • MARY JO LEWIS | Office Manager • MICKI MATHIESEN | Controller • JUDY JOHNSON | Director, Investor Relations 8:15 AM 8:45 AM 10:30 AM TUESDAY, JULY 12 11:15 AM ®AEDO SITE VISIT ITINERARY 7.11.16 - 7.13.16 TUESDAY, JULY 12 COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS International Trade Partners ATTENDEES: • KATHLEEN MOTZENBECKER | Executive Director, MN Trade Office (at DEED) • LAWRENCE RESZETAR | Director, Office of FDI, MN Trade Office • RYAN KANNE | Director – Minneapolis Office, US Commercial Service • PAUL HANSEN | Consulate General of Canada, Canadian Consulate (also with Forensic Technologies, Inc.) • AISHA FRISWOLD | Engagement Manager, Genoa Business Advisors (tentative) • DAVID GRIGGS | Vice President, Business Investment & Research, GREATER MSP • JEFFREY RAINEY | Project Manager, GREATER MSP • JENNIFER ERICKSON | Export Development Manager, GREATER MSP COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS Broker Partners ATTENDEES: • ANN MARIE WOESSNER COLLINS | Managing Director, Jones Lang LaSalle • BLAKE HASTINGS | Managing Director, CBRE • TOM LAMBRECHT | Economic Development Services Manager, Great River Energy, GREATER MSP Partner Council • BRIAN FOGELBERG | First Vice President, CBRE • DAN PETERSON | Senior Associate, Colliers • JIM VOS | Principal, Cresa Partners • DAVID GRIGGS | Vice President, Business Investment & Research, GREATER MSP • GENE GODDARD | Director, Business Investment, GREATER MSP 1:30 PM 2:30 PM PAGE 2 LUNCH AT GREATER MSP WITH COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS State of Minnesota and local Business Investment Partners. ATTENDEES: • SHAWNTERA HARDY | Commissioner, MN Department of Employment & Economic Development (DEED) • KEVIN MCKINNON | Deputy Commissioner for Economic Development, DEED, GREATER MSP Partner Council Member • JEFF PHILLIPS | International Trade Manager, MN Department of Agriculture • JEFF ROSSATE | Director of Business Development, DEED • COLLEEN EDDY | Economic Development Specialist, City of Elk River • SAMANTHA DIMAGGIO | City of Shakopee, Economic Development Coordinator • DAVID GRIGGS | Vice President, Business Investment & Research, GREATER MSP • JOEL AKASON | Director, Business Investment, GREATER MSP COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS Medical Device Sector Partners ATTENDEES: • SHAYE MANDLE | President & CEO, Medical Alley Association, GREATER MSP Partner Council Member • TIM TRIPP | Assistant Director, Office of Economic Development, University of MN • MATT PODHRADSKY | City Administrator, City of Chaska • NATE KABAT | Assistant City Administrator, City of Chaska • TIM MCGRAW | Vice President, Global EHS, Security & Facilities, Smiths Medical • DAVID EDMISTON | International Trade Specialist, US Commercial Service • BILL GOINS | Worldwide Account Manager – Account Services, FedEx • DALE WAHLSTROM | President & CEO, Act3 • DAVID GRIGGS | Vice President, Business Investment & Research, GREATER MSP • MORGAN HILL | Project Manager, Business Investment, GREATER MSP • MEGAN BARNETT-LIVGARD | BR&E Manager / MMMP Coordinator, GREATER MSP 12:00 PM 3:30 PM COMMUNITY TOUR Michael Langley will provide a tour on route to dinner meeting with GREATER MSP Board leadership in Minneapolis. DINNER MEETING Minneapolis Club ATTENDEES: • RICHARD DAVIS | Chair & CEO, US Bancorp, GREATER MSP Board President • TIM MCGOUGH | Executive Vice President, McGough Construction, GREATER MSP Board Member • CHRIS POLICINSKI | President & CEO, Land O’Lakes Inc., GREATER MSP Board Member • GINNY HUBBARD MORRIS | Chair and CEO, Hubbard Radio, LLC., GREATER MSP Board Member & Finance & Audit Committee Chair (tentative) • KEDRICK ADKINS | Chief Financial Officer, Mayo Clinic (tentative) • MICHAEL LANGLEY | CEO, GREATER MSP • CECILE BEDOR | Executive Vice President, GREATER MSP 4:30 PM 6:00 PM ®AEDO SITE VISIT ITINERARY 7.11.16 - 7.13.16 TUESDAY, JULY 12 COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEW Conference Call with JIM HOVLAND, Mayor, City of Edina, GREATER MSP Partner Council Member COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEW Regional Indicators Project & Talent Initiative Partners ATTENDEES: • JULIA SILVIS | Itasca Manager, McKinsey & Company, GREATER MSP Partner Council Member • DUSHESNE DREW | Community Network Vice President, The Bush Foundation • DANIELLE STEER | Operations & Member Experience Design Manager, Impact Hub • PAM LAMPERT | Senior Vice President, HR & Communication, Pohlad Companies • MATT LEWIS | Strategy Manager, GREATER MSP • TIFFANY ORTH | Make It. MSP. Coordinator, GREATER MSP 10:45 AM COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS Center Cities Competitiveness Initiative Partners ATTENDEES: • JONATHAN SAGE MARTINSON | Planning & Economic Development Director, City of Saint Paul, GREATER MSP Partner Council Member • HEATHER WORTHINGTON | Deputy County Manager, Ramsey County • CRAIG TAYLOR | Community Planning & Economic Development Director, City of Minneapolis, GREATER MSP Partner Council Member • RYAN O’CONNOR | Policy & Planning Director, Ramsey County • CECILE BEDOR | Executive Vice President, GREATER MSP • SHAUEN V.T. PEARCE-LASSITER | CCCI Director (housed at GREATER MSP) PAGE 3 WEDNESDAY, JULY 13 MEET IN THE SAINT PAUL HOTEL LOBBY Michael & Cecile will meet Denny & Barbara. BREAKFAST MEETING WITH CECILE, MICHAEL & COMMUNITY LEADERS GREATER MSP Conference Room ATTENDEES: • KATE WOLFORD | President, McKnight Foundation, GREATER MSP Board Member • TAWANNA BLACK | Executive Director, Northside Funders Group • MATT KRAMER | President, Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce, GREATER MSP Partner Council Member • JULIE SULLIVAN | President, University of Saint Thomas • JAY COWLES | President, University Avenue Associates • TED MONDALE | CEO, Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority, GREATER MSP Partner Council Member 7:30 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 9:30 AM ®AEDO SITE VISIT ITINERARY 7.11.16 - 7.13.16 WEDNESDAY, JULY 13 TEAM DEBRIEFING LUNCHEON WITH GREATER MSP CEO, MICHAEL LANGLEY Saint Paul Grill COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEW Conference Call with Saint Paul MAYOR CHRIS COLEMAN and MINNEAPOLIS MAYOR BETSY HODGES. Mayor Coleman and Mayor Hodges are GREATER MSP Board Members. DRAFT PRELIMINARY REPORT DENNY & BARBARA LEAVE FOR MSP AIRPORT Arrive at MSP airport by 4:15pm for 5:45 / 5:59pm departing flights. (TCT, Inc. will be providing transportation.) 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:30 PM 3:45 PM PAGE 4 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT INFORMATION MICHAEL LANGLEY GREATER MSP CEO 651.343.9814 (cell) Michael.Langley@greatermsp.org CECILE BEDOR GREATER MSP Executive Vice President 651.343.9816 (work cell) 612.298.5071 (personal cell) Cecile.Bedor@greatermsp.org CONTACT INFORMATION REGARDING TRANSPORTATION, RESERVATIONS & MISC. MARY JO LEWIS GREATER MSP Office Manager / Assistant to Michael Langley 612.695.5246 (cell) MaryJo.Lewis@greatermsp.org GREATER MSP OFFICE ADDRESS 400 Robert Street North, Suite 1600 Saint Paul, MN 55101 651.287.1300 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TYPICAL MSP WEATHER IN JULY HIGHS IN THE MID-80S; LOWS IN THE MID-60S GREATER MSP STORY The Greater Minneapolis Saint Paul region will lead the world in solving its most important challenges for the future. Safe and abundant food, clean water and health solutions will drive the global economy in coming years. The Greater MSP region is the leader in these technologies and industries, and has the R&D, financial and business services infrastructure to support them. Our highly educated and culturally connected workforce will create that business success. Our quality of life and social collaboration will sustain that success. Businesses prosper here. People prosper here. From:Common Sense Edina To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:Scott H. Neal Subject:Common Sense for Edina - Putting relevant information on city web sites including events at Braemar Ice Arena Date:Tuesday, July 12, 2016 1:21:07 PM Tonight starts a summer NHL league at Braemar Ice Arena:http://www.startribune.com/beautiful-minnesota-based-nhlers-start-4-on-4-league/386364871/ There is no mention of this NHL league on the Braemar Ice Arena web site but yet there is information on the Braemer Ice Arena web site about a tournament from May 2016. There is seems to be a lot of blogging and tweeting by city employees but the various city of Edina web sites are slow to be updated with relevant information that might be of interest to Edina residents. This league would attract a crowd and they are charging admission. In other words it raises money for the Braemar Ice Arena which last year lost $250K. The Startribune thought it was more newsworthy than the city of Edina. David Frenkel From:Jeff Heelan To:Ann Kattreh Cc:Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Subject:Weber Park and Rosland Park Playground Replacement Date:Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:14:56 PM Mrs. Ann Kattreh, Good afternoon. Let me first start that I rarely intervene in the city of Edina affairs because I feel that the elected officials and representatives of the city have done an outstanding job in best interest of the majority. I am a homeowner in the Morningside neighborhood within walking distance of Kojetin Park. Kojetin park is a fine park that has been recently upgraded in the last few years and serves a small minority of the residents that utilize it within a minute area. Very underutilized for its size but yes convenient for its neighbors. My family and neighbors use this park occasionally for convenience, but it is not a “destination” park for the neighborhood. I highlight the word “destination” because it’s important for the basis of my concern. Recently I was notified that Weber Park and Rosland Park were both slated for a budgeted $375,000 makeover in 2016. This was a great to hear as a constituent because both parks are in definite need of a facelift. Respectfully, $175,000 for Weber Park and $200,000 for Rosland Park. Why I’m reaching out is because I was then notified that the dollars allocated for each are now shifting from one pot (Weber budgeted $$ to be reduced by $75,000 almost 43% decrease) to (Rosland budgeted $$ to increase $75,000 about 33% increase) as a proposal to the City Council without community feedback or a proposal for Weber Park. My concern is how can the City Council make a fair and unbiased decision (this evening the 12th of July only for Rosland) for either without both proposals presented equally. This is an important decision for Edina and the families that reside, pay taxes and utilize the park & rec facilities so I would have anticipated both would be purposed equally for the budgeted $375,000. In addition, a budget is defined as an amount of money available for spending that is based on a plan for how it will be spent. The $200,000 was determined for Rosland by I’m assuming the Parks & Recreation department so it should be accountable to stay within the purposed budget. Not over extend themselves and borrow dollars from another development that has yet to be presented. If the budget for Rosland Park is over budget then it needs to be scaled back. If the budget for Weber Park is under budget then spend the allocated dollars on further improvements at Weber Park. These projects should be run as a profitable business and very simply if a project runs over then it has to be scaled back and if one runs under then allocate more dollars to it or put it back into the general fund. Lastly, my comment of “destination” for a facility should be identified as Weber Park. Weber park is what I would consider as the HUB and of activities for the Morningside Neighborhood. It is a common place for families to meet, events to take place and most importantly a community to come together. Without the Weber Park facility I’m certain you would not have such a strong community as is seen in Morningside. It is the children and the families that come together to coordinate Children’s Play Groups, Mom’s Groups, Men’s Groups and community events such as the annual softball tournament, annual soccer season, annual hockey season, annual flag football and soon the annual rugby season ALL utilizing the Weber Park facilities as a “destination” while their children play on the playground. In closing, the consideration for both projects and budgets should be equally addressed and not one prior to the other to City Council. In addition, budgets should be followed and maintained. Not opportunely shifted because one project runs over budget. Finally, Weber Park needs to be fairly addressed for the needs of the community. I am aware of the informational meeting this evening at Weber Park and will work to attend. The decisions need to slow down by one month and take into consideration feedback from the community and the tax base dollars that are funding both projects. There is no hurry to make the decision tonight for Rosland and my hope by addressing this to you and the City Council we take a breath and not rush a decision that timing makes no difference because the parks will be utilized regardless. Regards, Jeff Heelan Jeffrey D. Heelan | President | C&H Technology, Inc. | 6121 Baker Road – Suite 108| Minnetonka, MN 55345 | 800.274.4284 (ph) | 952.933.6223 (fax) | jeff.heelan@chtechnology.com | www.chtechnology.com | ISO 9001-2008 This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you received this message in error, please advise the sender by email reply and delete and destroy the message. From:Robert Stewart To:Edina Mail Subject:RE: Bad Idea: Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area Date:Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:21:24 PM Attachments:image003.png Dear Peter and Sara, Thank you for your note. It is very helpful to the City Council members to hear all sides. - Bob Stewart From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina MailSent: Monday, July 11, 2016 8:48 AMSubject: FW: Bad Idea: Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area Lynette Biunno, Receptionist952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Ann Kattreh Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 8:21 AMTo: Edina MailCc: Janet CantonSubject: FW: Bad Idea: Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area Please include in City Council Correspondence Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Peter and Sara Ribbens [mailto:psribbens@comcast.net] Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 12:07 PMTo: Ann KattrehCc: 'Sara Ribbens'Subject: Bad Idea: Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area As people who live in close proximity to this project, Bruce Freeman has a "Letter to the Editor" in SUN CURRENT EDINA paper (Thursday, July 7, 2016). Bruce Freeman's letter to the editor touches on four major points why this is a BAD IDEA. He’s said it so much better than we can. For us, the most compelling point against comes to this, we have great cross country skiing at Highland Park. So Edina is going to go into competition with this facility? Also, children are tubing and sledding down the existing hills with no problem, and walking back up, for FREE. Even us Grandparents are able to walk up the hill. We may be far enough away that, in the winter, the noise and fuss won’t affect us. Yet, I can imagine how a lit trail and artificial snow drift on to Gleason Avenue are going to be a major sources of frustration for those living close by. This project plans to spend 3 million dollars, with no clear return on investment, or any return in the five years after completion. As others have said, don't we have better, higher priorities? Yes. We could go on about the waste of water to make snow, the number of warm winters we continue to experience, the tree’s cut down to make way for these 50’ XC trails... We disagree whole heartedly with every aspect from conception, justification, and implementation of Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area. Sincerely Peter & Sara Ribbens7216 Schey Drive, Edina MN. From:Scott H. Neal To:swensonann1@gmail.com; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Cc:Susan Faus; Ann Kattreh Subject:Re: Common Sense for Edina - Putting relevant information on city web sites including events at Braemar Ice Arena Date:Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:42:07 AM Fair criticism. Mention of this new league should be on our website. However, posting it on the Braemar Ice Arena website is not going to materially impact attendance numbers. There aren't enough visitors to that site to make a difference in that way. The story in the Star Trib is very important to drive attendance. We will also try to publicize the story in our various Facebook and Twitter accounts because of the raw number of friends, followers and fans on those sites. Nonetheless, Mr. Frenkel is right. It should be in the website. I will make sure that happens today. Scott On Jul 12, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Common Sense Edina <commonsenseforedina@gmail.com> wrote: Tonight starts a summer NHL league at Braemar Ice Arena: http://www.startribune.com/beautiful-minnesota-based-nhlers-start-4-on-4-league/386364871/ There is no mention of this NHL league on the Braemar Ice Arena web site but yet there is information on the Braemer Ice Arena web site about a tournament from May 2016. There is seems to be a lot of blogging and tweeting by city employees but the various city of Edina web sites are slow to be updated with relevant information that might be of interest to Edina residents. This league would attract a crowd and they are charging admission. In other words it raises money for the Braemar Ice Arena which last year lost $250K. The Startribune thought it was more newsworthy than the city of Edina. David Frenkel From:Larry Cipolla To:"Jim Hovland"; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:"Terry Straub"; cci1@visi.com Subject:Edina Community Garden - recommendations are for you to consider more Date:Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:16:01 AM Attachments:Multiple Benefits_2015 reformatted final.pdfSnapshot_2015_final.pdf 13 July 2016 Good morning everyone, Mary Brindle and I are on the Southdale YMCA Board. At our last Board meeting Mary asked me for my take-opinion-comments about our community garden. Included below are some of those comments and recommendations regarding the Edina Community Garden (ECG). The attachments will help to clarify the concept and purpose(s) of community gardens in general and some numbers regarding their acceptance and proliferation in the metro area. Susan Phillips provided these attachments to me and could provide additional clarification if needed. Primary purposes of this email are to: · Recommend that Edina establish additional community gardens; · Recommend that you consider creating community gardens in under-utilized parks and other areas within the City; · Recommend that you consider including roof-top gardens on any new multi-unit condos/apartments/commercial buildings planned for the City; · Recommend establishing communal gardens, including roof-top gardens, in our schools, faith-based organizations, and existing multi-unit apartments/condos, space permitting and where/whether the residents would want to have such a garden; · Encourage healthier eating habits by providing the space for people to grow some of their own food, pesticide free, in communal gardens; and · Reinforce the 3N-factor, Nature-Nurture-Nutrition, to make the connection between growing and consuming and that not all food comes in a frozen package or can or box (especially for young people who often do not have a clue where their food comes from). Larry Cipolla: I have been a resident of Edina since 1976. I helped start the first ECG. I am a docent at the UMINN Arboretum. I am a Master Gardener and have served on the Hennepin County Leadership Team, created the first for profit plant sale and learning garden tour in the county, and served on the State Advisory Board and was elected its Chair for two of my three year tenure. I am currently involved in 12 community gardens, school yard gardens, summer camp gardens, senior high rise gardens, and different faith-based gardens throughout the county. I am a frequent speaker-instructor to garden clubs, other master gardener counties, the State Fair, School Yard Coalition conferences, and continue to conduct formal classes, from beginning to advanced, to the general public and to those who have rented a plot(s) at our ECG. My primary focus is to teach a wide range of techniques for growing vegetables and herbs, including year-around hydroponic gardening. I and two other master gardeners are on the ECG site, periodically, to help with renters’ concerns, provide gardening tips, and to offer whatever guidance we can. My (our) goal as a master gardener is to provide education, guidance, establish specific protocols for communal gardens, provide neighborhoods and communities with suggestions for location, access, suitability, and plot layout to ensure success and sustainability, with minimal maintenance from City employees, for example. We are all volunteers. Some background and current status: 2016 starts our fourth year. Last year yielded excellent results. There were many positive comments by renters. We had better weather and no standing water as a result of the drain tile system installed by the City at the end of Y2. We have had a waiting list of renters from Year One, which is indicative of a growing need and desire for additional gardens in the City. All 54 plots are rented. The 55th plot in the NE corner where the drain is located and is the lowest and potentially the wettest point in the garden, was taken over by myself and another master gardener. We planted perennial flowers to attract a wide range of pollinators—bees, butterflies, humming birds. There is a growing community and overall communal atmosphere between and among renters. Several renters grow vegetables and herbs for their own consumption and for donating any excess to VEAP and/or other food shelf organizations. Renters willingly share their gardening knowledge with others. Some leave their tools for others to use. ECG renters include single seniors, families, experienced gardeners and complete novices. One family, in the NW corner, has created a garden specifically for their kiddies, complete with a fairy garden, windmills, a water “pool” to attract butterflies, and lots of veggies primarily to demonstrate how plants grow from seed to the dinner plate. Thanks to improvements the City has made (and I trust will continue to make), the gardens boast high yields in (now) productive soil, include elevated garden beds for those with mobility issues and/or for those who find it difficult to bend down/kneel down. For the last two years, the City has provided extra black dirt/composted material for the renters. There is an area for recycling and composting vegetable/organic matter; waste bins; benches; water spigots and commercial grade hoses. These are some of the positives. Other positives for community gardens in general are identified in the attachments. There were negatives associated with this first ECG: The concept of community gardens (and communal gardens) is sound, proven, and in high demand. There are over 600 community gardens in the 7 county metro area, with about 300 in Minneapolis and 130 in St. Paul alone. Community gardens fail or exceed initial budget projections because of poor execution, poor administration, and/or a lack of coordination between departments within a city. Vegetable gardening requires different soil and growing conditions than, say, flowers. The soil must be friable, have good drainage, be free of hazardous materials such as asbestos, construction rubble, and be located in full sun and away from trees. While some flowers are edible, all vegetables are and, therefore, the quality of the soil is critical, especially if one is concerned about healthy eating. The initial meetings to explore and set up our community garden was an experience, not to be repeated. I was not at the first meeting. I believe the Mayor (?) suggested I attend subsequent meetings, which I did. Apparently the first meeting was focused primarily on legal issues and why the City could be liable for a wide range of nasty issues and why something called a community garden did not fit the image of Edina. The committee included supporters and detractors and people who had no clue as to how to establish and sustain a community garden. Some of the comments that carried over from to first to the second meeting included the following …. · Community gardens will reduce property values · Community gardens have no tradition in Edina, so why start now · Community gardens will attract undesirable elements and increase crime · Community gardens are primarily for poorer people · Most Edina residents live in home with yards, therefore community gardens are not needed · There is really not much demand for such gardens, so why have one · They are eye-sores, poorly maintained, and the City will have to take care of them (forever) · Tax dollars should not be used for a community garden (but tax dollars for sports facilities are okay?) Regardless, the committee moved forward, proven protocol were established for the garden, recommendations presented to the City/Park&Rec department, and the Council approved the project. Thank you. Years One and Two were total disasters for the ECG. The existing soil (poor drainage, rubble, a dumping ground for whatever) was not conducive for growing crops. This rubble/soil should have been removed at the very beginning. first sight, the location seemed great. Then the skate board park proved to be a very bad neighbor. The first two years saw heavy rains and a cooler spring. That is on nature. However, compounding the problems with poor drainage was the draining of water from the skate-board park directly into the garden. Almost every gardener had to replant at least three times during those first two years; several renters simply gave up and walked away from their plots. Plots were left unattended. There were many negative comments hurled towards the City. Not good. Throwing a dart against a map, erecting a fence, and laying out plots does not a sustainable garden make. There was a lack of coordination-communication or simply indifference for understanding how the outflow of water from the skate-board affected the gardens. A simple inexpensive berm or curbing could have prevented the problem at minimal cost. At the conclusion of the growing season in Y2, the City followed by recommendations and then took a major positive step forward (thank you). Approximately 24” of the existing soil-rubble-whatever was removed and replaced with a like amount of black dirt and composted material. In addition and at great expense, the City installed an extensive drainage system throughout the garden area. The area was roto-tilled (paid for by several renters, not the City) to break up the soil which had become compacted because of the heavy equipment used to spread out the black dirt/composted material and from installing the drainage system. The City reinstalled the wood chip paths and made the area ready for Y3. Y2 ended with hopes for a better Y3. Hindsight is always perfect: The initial problems have been corrected, mostly. The vendor who installed the chain link fencing failed to take into account access by critter rabbits. The space under and next to the garden gates would easily accommodate a small pony or a large animal. Rabbits had no problem entering the garden. As a result, rabbits found a fast-food Yum-Yum place to have lunch (and dinner and breakfast) without having to worry about other predators. City employees had to add additional fencing to prevent this, which has almost worked perfectly. An ongoing rabbit problem involves very small bunny rabbits who can slip through the 2” chain links. And once inside, they tend to grow quickly and are very difficult to trap-remove. I believe the critter is still inside as we speak. A solution is to use 1” chain link fencing (very expensive) or to add 24” of chicken wire to the bottom of the chain link—not as expensive, but a tad tedious. Another option is to live trap the critter(s). I do not know what the City paid for this first community garden. I believe the Southdale YMCA paid for expanding the parking lot. Regardless, the amount was too much (sorry) for a community garden of this size, but thank you for making things right. However my guess is, and it is just a guess, is that the City paid somewhere between $60,000 and $75,000. Too expensive. Not necessary. Not in the best interests of the Edina taxpayer, though of course this is not nor will it be the only project that experiences a cost over-run. Typically, a community garden of the size now located behind the fire station should not exceed a budget of $10,000-$15,000. This would include site preparation by City employees to remove the existing soil, include chain link fencing, wood chip paths, adding benches, trash bins, etc. Soil testing need not be conducted by an outside commercial company. Too expensive. Soil tests, including those conducted by those outside commercial companies, are typically performed by the University of Minnesota, St. Paul Campus for a fee of $17 per sample (price for 2016). For an additional fee, toxicology analysis can be done if needed and/or desired. And just an FYI, master gardeners can do this for you at no expense to you, save for the $17 plus mailing to the UMINN. To my knowledge, all community gardens charge renters a fee. Edina charges a fee and should continue doing so. Fees can be arbitrarily set, but typically are set so the City (or the faith- based organization) recaptures all of their upfront expenses over a period of time. Specific protocols—rules, regulations, specifications, do’s and don’ts—are established and agreed upon by all renters. A renter who chooses not to maintain their plot properly according to the rules, loses their privilege to rent again. Returning renters have priority over new renters and have priority for renting their same plot year after year. Most renters have returned year after year and spent considerable time and their money to amend their plots and make them as productive as possible. City (or neighborhood) residents have first priority over non-residents. Most vegetables are allowed, but tall or sprawling vegetables are not allowed. The complete set of protocol items are available for your review. Costs and earlier problems notwithstanding, the yields and productivity in Y3 and Y4 (so far) are excellent. Aside from the one (?) bunny in the garden, there are no longer any water drainage issues or other pressing problems confronting renters. The drainage system works fantastically (thank you again). Originally, I had proposed that we include a rain garden by the drain because of the standing water issue. This year I changed that goal and created a garden for pollinators, which, hopefully, will survive and prosper. It would be nice for the City to erect a sign or two promoting this type of environmentally friendly garden (for others to emulate in the yards, businesses, schools, et al.). We can provide the content for you. Next Steps: That is up to all of you. Recommendations for your consideration: · Create a second community garden adjacent to the existing ECG, which could be located just to the NNW and accommodate at least another 55 plots. The existing parking lot should suffice. The area includes multiple (apartments-condos) housing units. · Create a community garden at Arneson Acres, which is not fully utilized, and could easily include 50-60 plots and still allow plenty of open/free space; · Create a community garden at Lewis Park adjacent to the existing kiddie garden (or perhaps closer and more accessible to the apartment units and those residents); · Create a community garden at Fred Richards (but not in a low-lying or swampy area); · Consider other under-utilized but viable, sustainable areas throughout the City for community/communal gardens; and · Encourage, promote school yard gardens at Creek Valley, which has lots of acres of under- used high-maintenance areas that could be used in a more productive, low-maintenance manner, and, by the way, used as a great outdoor educational venue for the kiddies’ learning experience—transferring book/classroom learning to experiential/outdoor learning. Process:Without making this a short-term career, consider scheduling a half-day/one-day walk- through, drive-by, with all or some of you (I would be glad to participate) to identify potential sites. What could be a viable site? Create a list. Prioritize the list to determine which potential sites could be developed easily and in a relatively short time (starting this fall?). Identify how many to develop the first, second, and third year. Establish a budget. Plan and coordinate what needs to be done, by whom, and when. Implement it. Then utilize the expertise of master gardeners to provide any education and guidance to ensure sustainability and economic success. We can do this at no cost to the city. As a reminder: All Master Gardeners are volunteers. We train the renters so they can maintain their own specific plots. We can even train you. We provide the guidance, the training, the support, the techniques to create a viable and sustainable garden environment. We take responsibility for helping the project succeed. The City takes responsibility for developing the area, providing the fencing, providing the water, and other amenities they want, such as benches, trash bins, recycle bins, etc. The City takes responsibility for ensuring the site is coordinated with whatever departments might be involved. The renters take responsibility for amending their individual plot(s), maintaining it, keeping the connecting pathways clear of weeds, and for cleaning up their plots at seasons’ end. Each party takes ownership of their part and for the success of the whole. Once the garden has been established, the time required by City employees is minimal. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Please take the time to consider including additional community gardens in Edina. Call on master gardeners to help you as best they can. I am available to clarify and help as best I can. Respectfully, Larry Cipolla7021 Comanche Court From: Susan Phillips [mailto:susan.gardeningmatters@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:10 AM To: Larry Cipolla <cci1@visi.com> Subject: Re: Community Garden "numbers" Good morning all, So, the information in our data base is information that coordinators share with us on a voluntary basis, and while there are fields in our survey addressing some of those questions, often they are not filled out. I'll do my best to provide some answers to your questions. I am also attaching our 2015 Snapshot of Community Gardens and our Multiple Benefits document, which might be helpful to your advocacy efforts. We estimate there are 582 Community Gardens in the 7 county metro area. I would venture to say that is a conservative number. At least 290 of those are in Minneapolis (354 Hennepin County) and about 127 in St. Paul (158 in Ramsey County). Would you have a break-out of the various communal gardens, such as those associated with schools, churches, mosques, etc., corporate gardens, condo/senior high rise gardens, and so on. This is more difficult, as the data is voluntary, so take with a grain of salt: 46 gardens that are sponsored by/connected to a faith community8 corporate giving gardens 75 gardens that have a youth programming componentAnecdotally I know that ALL of the St. Paul Public Housing sites have community gardens. Several of MPHA's highrises do as well. I hope this is helpful, let me know if there is anything else we can do to promote your efforts. Have a great rest of the week, Susan Phillips Executive DirectorGardening Matters www.gardeningmatters.org612-821-2358 “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 1 Reducing carbon footprint: Produce from community gardens does not have to be processed, packaged, or transported long distances, cutting down on the waste and carbon emissions resulting from conventional produce. • In the United States, 10 calories of fossil-fuel energy are required to produce a single calorie of supermarket food (Pollan, 2008), and “getting food from the farm to our fork eats up 10 percent of the total U.S. energy budget” (Grunders, 2012). Produce sold in supermarkets spends up to 7-14 days in transit. During this time, almost 50% of the transported food is lost to spoilage (Community Food Security Coalition, 2003, p. 4). • 52% of fruits and vegetables in the U.S. are wasted: 20% in production, 12% in distribution and retail, and 28% at the consumer level (Grunders, 2012 p. 5). • 29% of total annual U.S. food production by weight is wasted at the distribution, retail and consumer level. The production, packaging, distribution, retail, and disposal of this wasted food accounts for 2% of the U.S. annual greenhouse gas emissions. (Venkat, 2011). Organic matter in landfills accounts for 16% U.S. emissions of methane, a greenhouse gas (Grunders, 2012). • Local agriculture conserves resources by shortening the commodity chain, saving on fuel-demanding transportation and packaging, and reducing emissions associated with wasted food (Bremer et al, 2003, p.23; Community Food Security Coalition, 2003, p. 4). • One study showed that soils in urban gardens have higher soil organic carbon--a measure of carbon storage--than conven- tional agricultural soils. (Edmondson et al., 2014). • Community farms on the urban fringe in Sutton, UK had higher carbon sequestration rates than urban parks and forests (Kulak et al., 2013). Municipal Benefits: Community Gardens are an economic benefit to local governments in several ways: • Green space in neighborhoods has been shown to have a significant positive effect on housing prices (Conway et al., 2010). • Community gardens have a positive effect on property values, especially in low-income neighborhoods in New York city (Voicu & Been, 2008). • In Milwaukee, properties within 250 feet of gardens experienced an increase of $24.77 with every foot and the average gar- den was estimated to add approximately $9,000 a year to the city tax revenue (Bremer et al, 2003, p. 20; Chicago, 2003, p. 10; Sherer, 2006). • Been and Voicu estimate that New York’s “gross tax benefit generated by all community gardens over a 20-year period amounts to about $563 million” (2006, p. 28). Of Community Gardening “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 2 • Community gardens provide a retreat from the noise and commotion of urban environments, and have been shown to attract small businesses (Sherer, 2006). • Community garden programs provide employment, education, and entrepreneurship opportunities for a wide variety of people, including students, recent immigrants, and homeless people (White, 2011a; Community Food Security Coali- tion, 2003). • Gardens reduce soil erosion and runoff, which lessens flooding and saves the city money (Bremer et al, 2003, p. 50, 56; Sherer, 2006; tpl, 2004). Food Production: Community gardens allow people without their own land the opportunity to produce food, and provide a place for gardeners to share knowledge and skills. • Access to land is a significant barrier to residential food production, which can be addressed by community gardens (Kortright & Wakefield, 2011). • In a participatory study of over 100 community, school and backyard gardens in New York City, the estimated total yield of these gardens in 2012 was 87,000 lbs of produce, valued at $ 330,000, encompassing 106 crop varieties (Farming Concrete 2012). • New York city community gardeners produced yields that were higher than the USDA listed average for several com- mon crops--collards and tomatoes-- indicating that community gardens are an efficient way to grow produce (Gittleman et al., 2012). • Participants of D-Town Farms, a project of the Detroit Black Community Food Security Network, cited intergenera- tional relationships that pass on gardening knowledge, and access to produce in food desert areas, as benefits of their garden project (White, 2011a). • Community gardens are places that develop, retain and transmit “knowledge and experience required to grown food...contributing to urban resilience” (Barthel et al., 2014). Health Benefits: Physical Health Benefits • Eating more organic local produce reduces exposure to chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Local food can “be eaten fresh, without the preservatives that are typically added to produce that is shipped long distances” (Bremer et al, 2003,p. 54). • “Community gardens provide a place that fosters both positive aesthetic experiences (taste, smell, touch, sight) and the satisfaction of growing good food. These experiences shift the relationship that gardeners have with food, sup- porting processes necessary for healthy eating behaviors” (Hale et al., 2011). • Community gardening has repeatedly been shown to increase consumption of fruits and vegetables among partici- pants (Barnidge et al., 2013; Blaine et al., 2010; Carney et al. 2011; Litt et al., 2011; Poulsen et al., 2014). • Community gardeners in one study ate fruits and vegetables 5.7 times a day on average, compared with 3.9 times a day for non-gardeners (Litt et al., 2011). • In a participatory study of a Hispanic community in Oregon, participants were supported in creating and maintaining “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 3 gardens. Over the gardening season, frequency of vegetable intake increased for adults and children, and frequency of worrying about food running out decreased significantly (31.2%-3.1%) during the post-garden period (Carney , 2011). • Multiple studies have demonstrated that school garden programs, when combined with other components such as cooking and nutrition lessons and taste testing, have a positive impact on children’s vegetable and fruit consumption, taste preference for fresh produce, and willingness to try produce (Brown 2014; Castro et al., 2013; Evans et al., 2013; Gibs et al., 2013; Morgan et al., 2010; Ratcliffe et al., 2011; Somerville et al., 2012). • School gardening programs can improve recognition of vegetables, and increase the variety of vegetables eaten by children (Ratcliffe et al., 2011). • A 12-week after school cooking, nutrition and gardening program with primarily Latin@ 4th and 5th-graders led to increased dietary fiber intake and decreased diastolic blood pressure among participants. Among overweight partici- pants, the program also led to reductions in BMI and reduced weight gain (Davis et al., 2011). • A study out of the University of Utah showed that gardeners have lower odds of being overweight or obese than their neighbors (Zick et al, 2013). • Participants in a community-based farming intervention program for HIV patients reported “less distress symptoms, improved overall general health, and reduced frequency of illicit drug use.” (Sacham et al., 2012). • One study found that “For every additional year spent in the [community gardening] program, respondents spend 0.205 hours (roughly 12 minutes) more per week working on their plots—or alternatively 2 hours more per week for every 10 years spent in the program. This implies increasing commitment to gardening over time as opposed to "burnout" and thus provides evidence of life-long behavioral change among respondents” (Blaine et al., 2010). Mental Health Benefits • Living near urban green space has been shown to increase life satisfaction (Bertram & Rehdanz, 2014). • Time spent on allotment gardens in the summer was a significant predictor of increased well-being in one study. Par- ticipants reported improvements in mental and physical health associated with time spent at their gardens (Webber, 2013). • Community gardening cultivates psychological well-being through social and sensory experiences. Gardening pro- motes a sense of pride and accomplishment, and can allow people to form deep spiritual connections with the earth (Poulsen et al., 2014). • In a participatory study of a Hispanic community in Oregon, participants in a community gardening program reported mental health benefits from working in their gardens together with their families (Carney et al., 2011). • Gardening is particularly beneficial to older adults. Studies have shown that gardening can contribute to overall life satisfaction, strengthen social networks, decrease feelings of loneliness, and provide other psychological benefits to the elderly (Cheng et al., 2011; Tse, 2010; Sommerfeld et al., 2010). These benefits are derived from both “doing” gar- dening activities as well as “being” at the garden site (Hawkins et al., 2013). • A study of guests at a daytime shelter for homeless women who planted, tended, prepared, and ate from their gar- dens found that gardening contributed to “stress relief, social inclusion, personal change, [and] self-actualization” (Grabbe et al., 2013). “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 4 Exercise: • Community gardens can provide a safe space for recreation and exercise (White, 2011a). • “As gardeners engage with the process of growing their own fruits and vegetables, they also develop positive emo- tional and aesthetic experiences with physical activity” (Hale et al., 2011). • Gardening tasks are moderate-high physical activity for children (Park et al., 2013). • In a study of mostly low-income elementary schools, children at schools that received gardens were more active, with more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and less sedentary activity than children at control schools (Wells et al., 2014). • Gardening is exercise that can be done at one’s own pace, which is particularly important for older people (Poulsen et al., 2014). • Gardeners over 65 reported statistically higher levels of physical activity and perceptions of personal health than non-gardeners in one study (Sommerfeld et al., 2010). • In a study of adults between 50 and 88, gardeners reported “significantly less perceived stress than participants of indoor exercise classes” (Hawkins et al., 2011). • Increased frequency and length of gardening tasks predicted better mobility in the elderly (Leng and Wang, 2013). Crime Prevention: Community gardens offer a solution to vacant lots, a focal point for community organizing, and can lead to commu- nity-based efforts to deal with other social concerns such as crime. • Reclaiming vacant lots makes neighborhoods feel safer (Poulsen et al., 2014). • A study of residents’ perceptions of vacant land in a Philadelphia neighborhood found that vacant land caused feel- ings of decreased community wellbeing, control over neighborhood, neighbor ties, and property values, and an in- crease in fear of crime and physical danger for children, and in feelings of sadness, depression, powerlessness, anger, and negative stigma by outsiders. Community-generated solutions including gardens were seen as a positive response to these concerns (Garvin et al., 2013a). • Residences near produce gardens are better maintained than ones near vacant or undeveloped lots (Krusky et al., 2014). • A community-based farming intervention for patients with HIV led to reduced frequency of illicit drug use (Sacham et al., 2012). • A randomized, controlled study in which selected vacant lots were cleaned, planted with trees and grass, and sur- rounded with a low wooden fence, showed “...a decrease in the number of total crimes and gun assaults around greened vacant lots compared with control. People around the intervention vacant lots reported feeling significantly safer after greening compared with those living around control vacant lots” (Garvin et al., 2013b). • Community gardens give youth a safe place to interact with peers and can involve them in beneficial activities (Sherer, 2006). “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 5 • Social networks fostered through youth-centered gardening programs can provide an alternative to gangs (Fulford & Thompson, 2013). The Urban Ecosystem: • Garden plants and micro-organisms have many ecological benefits, including: Filtering rainwater and helping to keep lakes, rivers, and groundwater clean (Bremer et al, 2003, p. 50). Reducing soil erosion and runoff, helping mitigate flooding (Bremer et al, 2003, p. 50, 56; Sherer, 2006; tpl, 2004). Restoring oxygen to the air and helping reduce air pollution through the gas exchange systems of leaves and soils (Chicago, 2003 p. 14; Sherer, 2006). A study comparing the soil quality of urban allotment gardens and conventional agricultural fields found that allot- ment soils had 32% more soil organic carbon (SOC), and a 36% higher carbon: nitrogen (C:N) ratio, than conven- tionally farmed soils. SOC and C:N ratio are important for healthy soil functioning and for carbon storage. This indi- cates that “small-scale urban food production can occur without the penalty of soil degradation seen in conven- tional agriculture” (Edmondson et al., 2014). • Community gardens are places where ecological management practices and knowledge are cultivated, shared be- tween gardeners and passed on through time. This process takes place through oral communication and by observing the techniques of fellow gardeners, and is strengthened by community guidelines and the wider social networks that community gardens are often a part of (Barthel et al., 2010). • “The ebb and flow of the seasonal garden cycles help gardeners gain a more embodied understanding of the natural processes that food production is dependent on…as well as fostering a sense of reciprocity among people and the land- scape” (Hale et al., 2011). • Community gardens add beauty to the community and heighten people’s awareness and appreciation for living things. In a Chicago survey, this was the #1 reason given for the importance of community gardens, mentioned by 14.3% of respondents, while 83% of respondents felt that the garden has enhanced the beauty of the community (Chicago, 2003, p. 34). Youth Education: Community gardens can serve as outdoor classrooms where youth learn valuable skills, like practical math, commu- nication, responsibility and cooperation. They also provide the opportunity to learn about the importance of com- munity, stewardship and environmental responsibility. • When combined with science education, gardening can be a form of experiential learning that is more effective than traditional classroom learning. In a study of Hispanic and African American middle school students in Los Angeles, stu- dents who participated in a science class with a school garden project showed dramatically improved science- processing skills when compared to those in a traditional science class (Blair, 2009 p. 19). • Several studies of the REAL School Garden program, which provides school gardens, garden-based learning, and teacher training in low-income Texas schools, found that “84% of students experiencing hands-on academic lessons in [school gardens] report high levels of engagement, specifically in math in science.” Schools with gardens also surpassed other schools on standardized science test scores (McCartney, 2013). • A two-year garden-based learning program for disruptive and low-performing students in Spain was shown to de- “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 6 crease school failure, dropout rate, and classroom disruption, and improve the skills, self-esteem, and self-confidence of students (Ruiz-Gallardo et al., 2013). • A youth gardening intern program in Winnepeg for “at-risk” youth reported gains in “skills, improved self-esteem, increased environmental awareness, enhanced food security” among youth interns. Through the garden program, youth “fostered their own social networks to help counter the attraction to gangs” (Fulford & Thompson, 2013). • A study in Minneapolis and Saint Paul found that youth in garden programs were more willing to eat nutritious and unfamiliar foods than youth not in garden programs, and were more likely to cook and garden outside the program (Lautenschlager & Smith 2007). • Children in an Ontario school garden program demonstrated enhanced environmental stewardship behaviors as a result of the program (Upitis et al., 2013). • A study of elementary school students in Texas found that children that had any type of experience with gardening had more positive attitudes toward the environment than students who had not gardened. The study showed that hands-on gardening activities are important to the development of environmentally concerned citizens, and that chil- dren's involvement in informal gardening experiences has as much impact on their environmental outlook as involve- ment in formal school-based programs (Aguilar et al, 2008). • Elementary-aged children who had lessons in a school garden could better estimate species richness and identify more plants than children who learned similar lessons in a classroom. Additionally, children who learned in the garden saw species richness as a positive aesthetic quality. These findings have implications for cultivating citizens who are concerned for the importance and protection of biodiversity (Benkowitz & Kohler, 2010). Social and Community Benefits: Community gardens provide spaces to interact with neighbors, to create and strengthen community and cultural tra- ditions, to take agency and act collectively, and to resist oppression. • Community gardens offer unique opportunities to establish relationships within and across physical and social barri- ers. (Bremer et al, 2003; Tranel & Handlin, 2004). • By creating safe spaces where community members can interact and share knowledge, tools, and gardening tasks, community gardens build social bonds and trust between neighbors, and create a sense of belonging to the larger com- munity (Poulsen et al., 2014). • Perceived benefits of community gardens include positive social experiences such as the sharing of work, produce, and gardening knowledge, and the creation of interpersonal bonds between diverse members (Northrop et al., 2013). • Surveys of community gardeners in Cleveland found that community gardens “increase feelings of community, [and] create ties to place by creating neighborhood satisfaction, and increasing feelings of safety” (Luke, 2013). • Community gardening and neighborhood beautification projects correlate with increased perceptions of neighbor- hood social capital (Alaimo et al., 2010; Firth et al., 2011). • In a Denver neighborhood, “Community and home gardening were positively associated with higher levels of neigh- borhood attachment when compared to people who did not garden.” (Comstock et al., 2010). Neighborhood attach- ment “promotes stability, involvement, and investment in the physical and social characteristics of the neighborhood” (Galster and Hesser, 1982, Mesch and Manor, 1998 and Twigger-Ross and Uzzell, 1996; cited in Comstock et al., 2010). • While working with and studying a group of black women activists in Detroit who were transforming vacant lots into “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 7 gardens, Monica White found that their efforts improved access to healthy food, created safe spaces for community gatherings and fostered inter-generational relationships. The project modeled self-reliance, self determination, em- powerment, and agency, and set an example for collective work, activism, and taking agency in other aspects of com- munity life (2011b). Milwaukee community gardens are places of citizenship practice, allowing people who have “struggled to be incor- porated politically and to meet material needs” to “transform space according to their own interests, claim rights to space, engage in leadership and decision-making activities, contest material deprivation, and articulate collective identities” in the face of systematic oppression (Ghose & Pettygrove, 2014). • Community gardens can provide a space for people to “affirm cultural gardening practices and therefore express an important part of their heritage” (Hale et al., 2011). • A participatory study of a kitchen garden project in Vancouver, BC showed how gardening can be a force of decoloni- zation. The project focused on traditional aboriginal foods and medicines, cooking and preservation techniques, and cultural celebrations and feasts. One participant said that the project “‘is decolonization because part of the coloniza- tion that we [Native people] live in is dependency’ and that the garden program decreases dependency on western health care and supports traditional health-promotion practices” (Mundel & Chapman, 2010). • One study found that “[Gardeners] who donate produce to hunger shelters, food banks, and other charitable organi- zations average spending about 4 hours and 20 minutes more in the garden per week than those who do not donate. This result is important because it shows that gardeners who are more active with their plots tend to use their partici- pation not only as a way to improve their own diets, but also to make a contribution to the community by donating produce” (Blaine et al., 2010). Horticultural Therapy: • “A ten percent increase in nearby green space was found to decrease a person’s health complaints in an amount equivalent to a five year reduction in that person’s age” (Sherer, 2006, p. 16). • In a Scottish study, perception of the quantity and quality of local green space influenced mental well-being. Addi- tionally, social contact while visiting green space was associated with lower stress levels (Thompson et al., 2014). • Gardening can relieve acute stress and restore positive mood (Van Den Berg & Custers, 2011), provides relaxation and a sense of pride and accomplishment (Northrop et al., 2013). • A multi-study analysis of 1252 people found that exercise in the presence of nature such as gardens significantly im- proved self-esteem and mood, with particularly strong positive effects on the self-esteem of the young and the mental- ly ill (Barton & Pretty, 2010). • A qualitative study of Swedish stress patients in garden therapy found that time in nature and “garden rooms” rein- forced their recovery process, through positive sensory experiences and social interactions (Adevi & Martensson, 2013). • According to Hale et al., “When the gardeners perceive the garden landscape as providing an aesthetically pleasant experience, it results in feelings of joy, pride, purpose, peace and awe… [and helps] gardeners to process emotions, provide a sense of purpose, and foster stability through the regular cycles of the garden” (Hale et al., 2011). References “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 8 Adevi, Anna A., Martensson, Fredrika. (2013). Stress rehabilitation through garden therapy: the garden as a place in the recovery from stress. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 12(2), 230-237. Aguilar, O.M., Waliczek, T.M., Zajicek, J.M. (2008). Growing Environmental Stewards: The Overall Effect of a School Gardening Pro- gram on Environmental Attitudes and Environmental Locus of Control of Different Demographic Groups of Elementary School Children. HortTechnology 18, 243-249 Alaimo, Katherine., Reischl, Thomas M., Allen, Julie Ober. (2010). Community gardening, neighborhood meetings, and social capi- tal. Journal of Community Psychology 38(4), 497-514. Barnidge, Ellen K., Hipp, Pamela R., Estlund, Amy., Duggan, Kathleen., Barnhart, Kathryn J., Brownson, Ross C. (2013). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 10, 128. Barthel, Stephan., Folke, Carl., Colding, Johan. (2010). Social-ecological memory in urban gardens--retaining the capacity for man- agement of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 20, 255-265. Barthel, Stephan., Parker, John., Folke, Carl., Colding, Johan. (2014) Urban gardens: pockets of social-ecological memory. In: Green- ing in the red zone 145-158. Barton, Jo., Pretty, Jules. (2010). What is the best dosage of green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science and Technology 44, 3947-3955. Been, V. & Voicu, I. (2006). The Effect of Community Gardens on Neighboring Property Values. Law & Economics Research Paper Series Working Paper No. 06-09. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://tpl.org Benkowitz, Dorothee., Kohler, Karlheinz (2010). Perception of Biodiversity--The Impact of School Gardening. In Urban Biodiversity and Design, edited by Norbert Muller, Peter Werner, John G. Kelcey. Bertram, Christine; Rehdanz, Katrin (2014) : The role of urban green space for human well-being, Kiel Working Paper, No. 1911 Blaine, Thomas W., Grewal, Parwinder S., Dawes, Ashley., Snider, Darrin. (2010). Profiling community gardeners. Journal of Exten- sion 48(6). Blair, Dorothy. (2009). The Child in the Garden: An Evaluative Review of the Benefits of School Gardening. Journal of Environmental Education 40(2). Bremer, A., Jenkins, K. & Kanter, D. (2003). Community Gardens in Milwaukee: Procedures for their long-term stability & their im- port to the city.– Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin, Department of Urban Planning. Brown, Joanna (2014) Using stated and revealed preferences to assess the impact of community-based agricultural education sum- mer camps on youth food preferences. University of Georgia Master of Science thesis. Carney, Patricia A., Hamada, Janet L., Rdesinski, Rebecca., Sprager, Lorena., Nichols, Katelyn R., Liu, Betty Y., Pelayo, Joel., Sanchez, Maria Antonia., Shannon, Jacklien. (2011). Impact of a community gardening project on vegetable intake, food security and family relationships: a community-based participatory research study. Journal of Community Health 37(4), 874-881. Castro, Dina C., Samuels, Margaret., Harman, Ann E. (2013). Growing healthy kids: a community-garden based obesity prevention program. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 44(3), s193-s199. Cheng, Eva Hui-Ping., Patterson, Ian., Packer, Jan., Pegg, Shane. (2011). Identifying the satisfactions derived from leisure gardening by older adults. Annals of Leisure Research 13(3), 395-419. Chicago Botanic Garden and the City of Chicago. (2003). Green connections: A research assessment of community gardening in Chicago. Chicago: City of Chicago. Community Food Security Coalition. (October 2003). Urban Agriculture and Community Food Security in the United States: Farming from the City Center to the Urban Fringe. Retrieved July 12, 2011, from http://www.foodsecurity.org Comstock, Nicole L., Dickinson, Miriam., Marshall, Julie A., Soobader, Mah-J., Turbin, Mark S., Buchenau, Michael., Litt, Jill S. (2010). Neighborhood attachment and its correlates: Exploring neighborhood conditions, collective efficacy, and gardening. Jour- nal of Environmental Psychology 30(4), 435-442. Conway, Delores., Li, Christina Q., Wolch, Jennifer., Kahle, Christopher., Jerrett, Michael. (2010). A Spatial Autocorrelation Ap- proach for Examining the Effects of Urban Greenspace on Residential Property Values. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 41(2), 150-169. Davis, Jaimie N., Ventura, Emily E., Cook, Lauren T., Gyllenhammer, Lauren E., Gatto, Nicole M. (2011). LA Sprouts: a gardening, “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 9 nutrition and cooking intervention for Latino youth improves diet and reduces obesity. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 111(8), 1224-1230. Edmondson, Jill L., Davies, Zoe G., Gaston, Kevin J., Leake, Jonathan R. (2014). Urban cultivation in allotments maintains soil quali- ties adversely affected by conventional agriculture. Journal of Applied Ecology 51(4), 880-889. Evans, Alexandra., Ranjit, Nalini., Rutledge, Ronda., Medina, Jose., Jennings, Rose., Smiley, Andrew., Stigler, Melissa., Hoelscher, Deanna. (2013). Exposure to multiple components of a garden-based intervention for middle school students increases fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Promotion Practice 13(5), 608-616. Farming Concrete: 2012 Harvest Report. Accessed at: http://farmingconcrete.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/03/2012HarvestReport.pdf Firth, Chris., Maye, Damian., Pearson, David. (2011). Developing “community” in community gardens. Local Environment: The In- ternational Journal of Justice and Sustainability 16(6), 555-568. Fulford, Stephanie., Thompson, Shirley. (2013). Youth community garden programming as community development: the Youth for EcoAction program in Winnepeg, Canada. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and social economy research 4(2). Garvin, Eugenia., Branas, Charles., Keddem, Shimrit., Sellman, Jeffrey., Cannuscio, Carolyn. (2013a). More than just an eyesore: local insights and solutions on vacant land and urban health. Journal of Urban Health 90(3), 412-426. Garvin, Eugenia C., Cannuscio, Carolyn C., Branas, Charles C. (2013b). Greening vacant lots to reduce violent crime: a randomized controlled trial. Injury Prevention 19(3), 198-203. Ghose, Rina., Pettygrove, Margaret. (2014). Urban community gardens as spaces of citizenship. Antipode 46(4), 1092-1112. Gibs, Lisa; Staiger, Petra K., Johnson, Britt., Block, Karen., Macfarlane, Susie., Gold, Lisa., Kulas, Jenny., Townsend, Mardie., Long, Caroline., Ukoummune, Obioha. (2013). Expanding children’s food experiences: the impact of a school-based kitchen gar- den program. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 45(2), 137-146. Gittleman, Mara., Kelli, Jordan., Brelsford, Eric. (2012). Using citizen science to quantify community garden crop yields. Cities and the Environment 5(1). Grabbe, Linda., Ball, Janell., Goldstein, Allison. (2013). Gardening for the mental well-being of homeless women. Journal of Holistic Nursing 31(4), 258-266. Grunders, Dana. (2012). Wasted: How America is losing up to 40 percent of its food from farm to fork to landfill. National Re- sources Defense Council Issue Paper IP 12-06-B. Hale, James., Knapp, Corinne., Bardwell, Lisa., Buchenau, Michael., Marshall, Julie., Sancar, Fahriye., Litt, Jill S.(2011). Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: gaining insight through the community garden- ing experience. Social Science and Medicine 72(11), 1853-1863. Hawkins, Jemma L., Thirlaway, Kathryn J., Backx, Karianne., Clayton, Deborah A. (2011) Allotment gardening and other leisure activ- ities for stress reduction and healthy aging. HortTechnology 21(5), 577-585. Hawkins, Jemma L., Mercer, Jenny., Thirlaway, Kathryn J., Clayton, Deborah A. (2013). “Doing” gardening and “being” at the allot- ment site: exploring the benefits of allotment gardening for stress reduction and healthy aging. Ecopsychology 5(2), 110- 125. Kortright, Robin., Wakefield, Sarah. (2011) Edible Backyards: a qualitative study of household food growing and its contributions to food security. Agriculture and Human Values 28(1), 39-53. Krusky, Allison M., Heinze, Justin E., Reischl, Thomas M., Aiyer, Sophie M., Franzen, Susan P., Zimmerman, Mark A. (2014). The effects of produce gardens on neighborhoods: a test of the greening hypothesis in a post-industrial city. Landscape and Urban Planning 136, 68-75. Kulak, Michal., Graves, Anil., Chatterton, Julia. (2013). Reducing greenhouse gas emissions with urban agriculture: a life cycle as- sessment perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 111, 68-78. Lautenschlager, Lauren & Chery Smith (2007). Beliefs, knowledge, and values held by inner-city youth about gardening, nutrition and cooking. Agriculture and Human Values 24(2), 245-258. Leng, Chian Hui., Wang, Jung-Der. (2013) Long term determinants of functional decline of mobility: An 11-year follow-up of 5464 adults of late middle aged and elderly. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 57(2), 215-220. “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 10 Litt, Jill S., Soobader, Mah-J., Turbin, Mark S., Hale, James W., Buchenau, Michael., Marshall, Julie A. (2011). The influence of social involvement, neighborhood aesthetics, and community garden participation on fruit and vegetable consumption. the American Journal of Public Health 101(8), 1466-1473. Luke, Jacqueline Anne. (2013) Masters of Arts in Geography Kent State University. Urban community gardens in a shrinking city: community strength and the urban community gardens of Cleveland, Ohio. McCartney, Jeanne. (2013). REAL school gardens program: learning gardens and teacher training to improve student engagement and academic performance in low-performing elementary schools. Journal of Applied Research on Children 4(2). Morgan, Philip J., Warren, Janet M., Lubans, David R., Saunders, Kristen L., Quick, Gabrielle I., Collins, Clare E. (2010). The impact of nutrition education with and without a school garden on knowledge, vegetable intake, and preferences and quality of school life among primary-school students. Public Health Nutrition 13(11), 1931-1940. Mundel, Erika., Chapman, Gwen E. (2010). A decolonizing approach to health promotion in Canada: the case of the Urban Aborigi- nal Community Kitchen Garden Project. Health Promotion International 35(2), 166-173. Northrop, Matthew D., Wingo, Brooks C., Ard, Jamy D. (2013). The Perceptions of Community Gardeners at Jones Valley Urban Farm and the Implications for Dietary Interventions. The Qualitative Report 18(27). Park, Sin-Ae., Lee, Ho-Sang., Lee, Kwan-Suk., Son, Ki-Cheol, Shoemaker, Candice A. (2013). The metabolic costs of gardening tasks in children. HortTechnology 23(5), 589-594. Pollan, Michael. (2008). Farmer In Chief. New York Times Magazine, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/magazine/12policy-t.html Poulsen, Melissa N., Hulland, Kristyna R. S., Gulas, Carolyn A., Pham, Hieu., Dalglish, Sarah L., Wilkinson, Rebecca K., Winch, Peter J. (2014). Growing an urban oasis: a qualitative study of the perceived benefits of community gardening in Baltimore, Mary- land. The Journal of Culture and Agriculture 36(2), 69-82. Ratcliffe, Michelle A., Merrigan, Kathleen A., Rogers, Beatrice L., Goldberg, Jeanne P. (2011) The effects of school garden experienc- es on middle school-aged students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors associated with vegetable consumption. Health Promotion Practice 12(1), 36-43. Ruiz-Gallardo, Jose., Verde, Alonso., Valdes, Arturo. (2013). Garden-based learning: an experience with “at-risk” secondary educa- tion students. The Journal of Environmental Education 44(4), 252-270. Sacham, Enbal., Donovan, Michael F., Connolly, Shannon., Mayrose, Andrea., Scheuermann, Mary., Overton, E. Turner. (2012). Ur- ban farming: a non-traditional intervention for HIV-related distress. AIDS and Behavior 16(5), 1238-1242. Sherer, P.M. (2006). The benefits of parks: Why America needs more city parks and open space. Retrieved October 31, 2006, from http://www.tpl.org Somerville, Megan., Kessler, Lisa A., Wallace, Sharonda P., Burns-Whitmore, Bonny. (2012). The effect of a garden-based nutrition education program on the consumption of fruits and vegetables of Hispanic children. Californian Journal of Health Promo- tion 10, 20-25. Sommerfeld, Aime J., Walikzek, Tina M., Zajicek, Jayne M. (2010) Growing Minds: Evaluating the Effect of Gardening on Quality of Life and Physical Activity Level of Older Adults. HortTechnology 20(4), 705-710. Thompson, Catharine Ward., Aspinall, Peter., Roe, Jenny. (2014). Access to green space in disadvantaged urban communities: evi- dence of salutogenic effects based on biomarkers and self-reported measures of wellbeing. Social and Behavioral Sciences 153, 10-22. Tranel, M. and Handlin, L. (2004). Planting Seeds; Growing Communities. St. Louis: University of Missouri Public Policy Research Center. Tse, Mimi Mun Yee (2010). Therapeutic effects of an indoor gardening programme for older people living in nursing homes. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19(7-8), 949-958. Van Den Berg, Agnes E., Custers, Mariette H.G. (2011) Gardening promotes neuroendocrine and affective restoration from stress. Journal of Health Psychology 16(1), 3-11. Venkat, Kumar. (2011). The climate change and economic impact of food waste in the United States. International Journal of Food System Dynamics 2(4), 431-446. “Multiple Benefits of Community Gardening” Copyright 2015, Gardening Matters 11 Voicu, Ioan., Been, Vicki. (2008). The effect of community gardens on neighboring property values. Real Estate Economics 36(2), 241-283. Webber, Jo. (2013). Allotment gardening, connectedness to nature and wellbeing. Canturbury Christ Church University, Doctor of Clinical Psychology Thesis. Upitis, Rena., Hughes, Scott., Peterson, Anna. (2013) Promoting environmental stewardship through gardens: a case study of chil- dren’s views of an urban school garden. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies 11(1), 93-135. Wells, Nancy M., Myers, Beth M., Henderson Jr, Charles R. (2014). School gardens and physical activity: a randomized controlled trial of low-income elementary schools. Preventive Medicine 69, S27-S33. White, Monica M. (2011a) D-Town Farm: African American resistance to food insecurity and the transformation of Detroit. Environ- mental Practice 13(4), 406-416. White, Monica M. (2011b). Sisters of the soil: urban gardening as resistance in Detroit. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Con- texts 5(1), 13-28. Zick, C. D., Smith, K. R., Kowaleski-Jones, L., Uno, C., & Merrill, B. J. (2013). Harvesting More Than Vegetables: The Potential Weight Control Benefits of Community Gardening. American Journal Of Public Health, 103(6), e1-e6. From:Pamela Balabuszko-Reay To:Edina Mail; Ann Kattreh Subject:Weber and Rosland Parks Date:Wednesday, July 13, 2016 12:33:11 PM Hello Park Board Members, One of our neighborhood groups, The MAC or Morningside Athletic Club, received the following communication from Board Member Randy Meyer regarding the funding for the Weber Park and Rosland Park construction projects. I wonder about the ethics of Randy Meyer sending out this communication. The full text is below. He states “As a Park Board member, I’m not inclined to support the Rosland Park recommendation because it shifts funds away from Weber Park. My kids are beyond playground age, but a great neighborhood deserves a great playground.” That appears to violate the bylaws which state: "Members should exercise care not to communicate how they intend to vote on any pending matter or give the appearance any matter has been pre-decided.” Several neighbors have stated to me that they have given feedback about the Weber project. I am included in that group-having given face to face feedback at the Morningside Eco Fair regarding the surface for the playground. I requested wood mulch instead of automobile tire chunks. I know of at least one other person at the Fair who provided the same feedback. In addition I know of many neighbors, myself included, who support the shifting of the funds saved at Weber to Rosland Park for the construction of an inclusive and accessible park for kids and families with disabilities. I am glad those kids will have a great park experience. A $100k park at Weber is a luxury and something for which I am grateful. That money will provide our neighborhood with a state-of-the-art long-lasting park. The idea that Morningside is being cheated and that we are entitled to more somehow is distasteful to me. Thank you for your time and for the work that you are doing on our behalf. Pamela Balabuszko-Reay4246 Scott Terrace Edina, MN 55416 Communication with the Public Outside of Meetings Edina Park Board members are encouraged to share their work with members of the public within the guidelines noted in the paragraph below. When communicating Edina Park Board business with the public, members should understand and convey the following: The deliberations and decisions of the Edina Park Board will be based solely on information contained in the public record presented to all Edina Park Board members participating in the deliberation or action. The member’s comments do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of other commissioners or the Edina Park Board as a whole. Members should exercise care not to communicate how they intend to vote on any pending matter or give the appearance any matter has been pre-decided. From: edinamac@googlegroups.com [mailto:edinamac@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Randy Meyer Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 8:47 PM To: Morningside Athletic Club <edinamac@googlegroups.com> Subject: [MAC] Weber Park playground Loses 40% of Budget to Rosland Park Hi MAC, The Weber Park playground equipment is scheduled to be replaced this summer. Forty percent the original budget for this project has been transferred to Rosland park without public input or discussion. See discussion below from my Park Board meeting packet and comparison drawings of the two projects attached. There is an open house to discuss the Weber Park playground project tomorrow (Tuesday) at 6:00 p.m. in the Weber Park warming house. The Park Board meets tomorrow night at 7:00 at City Hall. The Park Board is being asked to recommend to the City Council that the city purchase and install the Rosland Park playground. The Park Board has not received feedback on, or reviewed the plans for, Weber Park. As a Park Board member, I’m not inclined to support the Rosland Park recommendation because it shifts funds away from Weber Park. My kids are beyond playground age, but a great neighborhood deserves a great playground. I would encourage you to attend the playground meeting tomorrow night and email the Park and Rec director (Ann Kattreh, akattreh@edinamn.gov) with any input/concerns. A summary of the playground input process to date is below. Randy The current playground structure at Rosland Park was designed and installed in 1996. It is one of the oldest playgrounds in Edina. The city has $375,000 budgeted in CIP funds to replace the playground structures at Rosland and Weber parks in 2016. $200,000 was budgeted for Rosland Park and $175,000 for Weber Park. Rosland Park is one of the most used playgrounds in the city and the primary focus of the replacement is an inclusive playground design. The goal is to make the playground usable by people of all abilities. The proposed design is 100% accessible via wheelchair. The cost for the proposed design for the playground structure and safety surface at Rosland Park is $275,000. Fortunately, the estimated cost to replace the playground structure at Weber Park with a comparable size structure is $100,000. So we are able to use the additional funds to achieve the inclusive playground design at Rosland Park. The original $175,000 was budgeted to include a rubber poured in place safety surface. After meeting with the neighborhood on multiple occasions, it was determined that the residents wanted a wood fiber safety surface instead of the rubber surface. The elements that were considered in the playground design were the actual play features, play value, safety, accessibility and cost. Weber Park playground input process to date—from Eric Boettcher, Edina Park and Rec staff, June 21, 2016: My neighborhood contact has been Joni Bennet and she has informed me of community events that have taken place. She has also helped by sending out information to the MNA through email invites. I have attended the following events to gather information and feedback to help design the playground: Sunday, April 24th Eco Fair at Weber Park - I set up an information booth to get some feedback on what the community was looking for in the playground. I had a design board with a variety of components and showed the variety of play structures as well as showed the different surface materials we could use. The information I received I took back to the playground designer and they put together a playground based on the feedback. Monday, June 6 - Provided updated playground design to Joni Bennet present at the Morningside Neighborhood Association Steering Committee meeting. They gave us additional feedback. Monday, June 20- Attended a Public meeting for Morning Side Neighborhood to provide the proposed playground design to get additional feedback. The key components designed thus far are to keep the playground where it is currently located, use wood fiber for the safety surface and provide features that would accommodate multiple age groups. The playground will meet ADA requirements for accessibility. The next step is to set up a public meeting by notifying residence within 1000 feet of Weber Park through a mailing. We will also promote the open house in the calendar section on the website and through Next Door. Once we finalize the design we plan to remove the existing playground and replaced with new playground sometime in late-August/ early- September. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Morningside Athletic Club" group.To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to edinamac+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.To post to this group, send email to edinamac@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/edinamac.For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From:Mary Brindle To:Larry Cipolla; "Jim Hovland"; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:"Terry Straub"; cci1@visi.com Subject:Re: Edina Community Garden - recommendations are for you to consider more Date:Wednesday, July 13, 2016 2:11:25 PM Hello Larry, Thank you for the following information, which I believe will be helpful as we move forward with community gardens in Edina. I appreciate the time and thoughtful amalysis! Mary Brindle. _______________________________ Mary Brindle mbrindle@comcast.net 612-270-9887 call or text From: Larry CipollaSent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:15 AMTo: 'Jim Hovland' ; jhovland@edinamn.gov ; mbrindle@edinamn.gov ; kstaunton@edinamn.gov ; rstewart@edinamn.gov ; swensonann1@gmail.comCc: 'Terry Straub' ; cci1@visi.comSubject: Edina Community Garden - recommendations are for you to consider more 13 July 2016 Good morning everyone, Mary Brindle and I are on the Southdale YMCA Board. At our last Board meeting Mary asked me for my take-opinion-comments about our community garden. Included below are some of those comments and recommendations regarding the Edina Community Garden (ECG). The attachments will help to clarify the concept and purpose(s) of community gardens in general and some numbers regarding their acceptance and proliferation in the metro area. Susan Phillips provided these attachments to me and could provide additional clarification if needed. Primary purposes of this email are to: · Recommend that Edina establish additional community gardens; · Recommend that you consider creating community gardens in under-utilized parks and other areas within the City; · Recommend that you consider including roof-top gardens on any new multi-unit condos/apartments/commercial buildings planned for the City; · Recommend establishing communal gardens, including roof-top gardens, in our schools, faith-based organizations, and existing multi-unit apartments/condos, space permitting and where/whether the residents would want to have such a garden; · Encourage healthier eating habits by providing the space for people to grow some of their own food, pesticide free, in communal gardens; and · Reinforce the 3N-factor, Nature-Nurture-Nutrition, to make the connection between growing and consuming and that not all food comes in a frozen package or can or box (especially for young people who often do not have a clue where their food comes from). Larry Cipolla: I have been a resident of Edina since 1976. I helped start the first ECG. I am a docent at the UMINN Arboretum. I am a Master Gardener and have served on the Hennepin County Leadership Team, created the first for profit plant sale and learning garden tour in the county, and served on the State Advisory Board and was elected its Chair for two of my three year tenure. I am currently involved in 12 community gardens, school yard gardens, summer camp gardens, senior high rise gardens, and different faith-based gardens throughout the county. I am a frequent speaker-instructor to garden clubs, other master gardener counties, the State Fair, School Yard Coalition conferences, and continue to conduct formal classes, from beginning to advanced, to the general public and to those who have rented a plot(s) at our ECG. My primary focus is to teach a wide range of techniques for growing vegetables and herbs, including year-around hydroponic gardening. I and two other master gardeners are on the ECG site, periodically, to help with renters’ concerns, provide gardening tips, and to offer whatever guidance we can. My (our) goal as a master gardener is to provide education, guidance, establish specific protocols for communal gardens, provide neighborhoods and communities with suggestions for location, access, suitability, and plot layout to ensure success and sustainability, with minimal maintenance from City employees, for example. We are all volunteers. Some background and current status:2016 starts our fourth year. Last year yielded excellent results. There were many positive comments by renters. We had better weather and no standing water as a result of the drain tile system installed by the City at the end of Y2. We have had a waiting list of renters from Year One, which is indicative of a growing need and desire for additional gardens in the City. All 54 plots are rented. The 55th plot in the NE corner where the drain is located and is the lowest and potentially the wettest point in the garden, was taken over by myself and another master gardener. We planted perennial flowers to attract a wide range of pollinators—bees, butterflies, humming birds. There is a growing community and overall communal atmosphere between and among renters. Several renters grow vegetables and herbs for their own consumption and for donating any excess to VEAP and/or other food shelf organizations. Renters willingly share their gardening knowledge with others. Some leave their tools for others to use. ECG renters include single seniors, families, experienced gardeners and complete novices. One family, in the NW corner, has created a garden specifically for their kiddies, complete with a fairy garden, windmills, a water “pool” to attract butterflies, and lots of veggies primarily to demonstrate how plants grow from seed to the dinner plate. Thanks to improvements the City has made (and I trust will continue to make), the gardens boast high yields in (now) productive soil, include elevated garden beds for those with mobility issues and/or for those who find it difficult to bend down/kneel down. For the last two years, the City has provided extra black dirt/composted material for the renters. There is an area for recycling and composting vegetable/organic matter; waste bins; benches; water spigots and commercial grade hoses. These are some of the positives. Other positives for community gardens in general are identified in the attachments. There were negatives associated with this first ECG: The concept of community gardens (and communal gardens) is sound, proven, and in high demand. There are over 600 community gardens in the 7 county metro area, with about 300 in Minneapolis and 130 in St. Paul alone. Community gardens fail or exceed initial budget projections because of poor execution, poor administration, and/or a lack of coordination between departments within a city. Vegetable gardening requires different soil and growing conditions than, say, flowers. The soil must be friable, have good drainage, be free of hazardous materials such as asbestos, construction rubble, and be located in full sun and away from trees. While some flowers are edible, all vegetables are and, therefore, the quality of the soil is critical, especially if one is concerned about healthy eating. The initial meetings to explore and set up our community garden was an experience, not to be repeated. I was not at the first meeting. I believe the Mayor (?) suggested I attend subsequent meetings, which I did. Apparently the first meeting was focused primarily on legal issues and why the City could be liable for a wide range of nasty issues and why something called a community garden did not fit the image of Edina. The committee included supporters and detractors and people who had no clue as to how to establish and sustain a community garden. Some of the comments that carried over from to first to the second meeting included the following …. · Community gardens will reduce property values · Community gardens have no tradition in Edina, so why start now · Community gardens will attract undesirable elements and increase crime · Community gardens are primarily for poorer people · Most Edina residents live in home with yards, therefore community gardens are not needed · There is really not much demand for such gardens, so why have one · They are eye-sores, poorly maintained, and the City will have to take care of them (forever) · Tax dollars should not be used for a community garden (but tax dollars for sports facilities are okay?) Regardless, the committee moved forward, proven protocol were established for the garden, recommendations presented to the City/Park&Rec department, and the Council approved the project. Thank you. Years One and Two were total disasters for the ECG. The existing soil (poor drainage, rubble, a dumping ground for whatever) was not conducive for growing crops. This rubble/soil should have been removed at the very beginning. first sight, the location seemed great. Then the skate board park proved to be a very bad neighbor. The first two years saw heavy rains and a cooler spring. That is on nature. However, compounding the problems with poor drainage was the draining of water from the skate-board park directly into the garden. Almost every gardener had to replant at least three times during those first two years; several renters simply gave up and walked away from their plots. Plots were left unattended. There were many negative comments hurled towards the City. Not good. Throwing a dart against a map, erecting a fence, and laying out plots does not a sustainable garden make. There was a lack of coordination-communication or simply indifference for understanding how the outflow of water from the skate-board affected the gardens. A simple inexpensive berm or curbing could have prevented the problem at minimal cost. At the conclusion of the growing season in Y2, the City followed by recommendations and then took a major positive step forward (thank you). Approximately 24” of the existing soil-rubble-whatever was removed and replaced with a like amount of black dirt and composted material. In addition and at great expense, the City installed an extensive drainage system throughout the garden area. The area was roto-tilled (paid for by several renters, not the City) to break up the soil which had become compacted because of the heavy equipment used to spread out the black dirt/composted material and from installing the drainage system. The City reinstalled the wood chip paths and made the area ready for Y3. Y2 ended with hopes for a better Y3. Hindsight is always perfect: The initial problems have been corrected, mostly. The vendor who installed the chain link fencing failed to take into account access by critter rabbits. The space under and next to the garden gates would easily accommodate a small pony or a large animal. Rabbits had no problem entering the garden. As a result, rabbits found a fast-food Yum-Yum place to have lunch (and dinner and breakfast) without having to worry about other predators. City employees had to add additional fencing to prevent this, which has almost worked perfectly. An ongoing rabbit problem involves very small bunny rabbits who can slip through the 2” chain links. And once inside, they tend to grow quickly and are very difficult to trap-remove. I believe the critter is still inside as we speak. A solution is to use 1” chain link fencing (very expensive) or to add 24” of chicken wire to the bottom of the chain link—not as expensive, but a tad tedious. Another option is to live trap the critter(s). I do not know what the City paid for this first community garden. I believe the Southdale YMCA paid for expanding the parking lot. Regardless, the amount was too much (sorry) for a community garden of this size, but thank you for making things right. However my guess is, and it is just a guess, is that the City paid somewhere between $60,000 and $75,000. Too expensive. Not necessary. Not in the best interests of the Edina taxpayer, though of course this is not nor will it be the only project that experiences a cost over-run. Typically, a community garden of the size now located behind the fire station should not exceed a budget of $10,000-$15,000. This would include site preparation by City employees to remove the existing soil, include chain link fencing, wood chip paths, adding benches, trash bins, etc. Soil testing need not be conducted by an outside commercial company. Too expensive. Soil tests, including those conducted by those outside commercial companies, are typically performed by the University of Minnesota, St. Paul Campus for a fee of $17 per sample (price for 2016). For an additional fee, toxicology analysis can be done if needed and/or desired. And just an FYI, master gardeners can do this for you at no expense to you, save for the $17 plus mailing to the UMINN. To my knowledge, all community gardens charge renters a fee. Edina charges a fee and should continue doing so. Fees can be arbitrarily set, but typically are set so the City (or the faith- based organization) recaptures all of their upfront expenses over a period of time. Specific protocols—rules, regulations, specifications, do’s and don’ts—are established and agreed upon by all renters. A renter who chooses not to maintain their plot properly according to the rules, loses their privilege to rent again. Returning renters have priority over new renters and have priority for renting their same plot year after year. Most renters have returned year after year and spent considerable time and their money to amend their plots and make them as productive as possible. City (or neighborhood) residents have first priority over non-residents. Most vegetables are allowed, but tall or sprawling vegetables are not allowed. The complete set of protocol items are available for your review. Costs and earlier problems notwithstanding, the yields and productivity in Y3 and Y4 (so far) are excellent. Aside from the one (?) bunny in the garden, there are no longer any water drainage issues or other pressing problems confronting renters. The drainage system works fantastically (thank you again). Originally, I had proposed that we include a rain garden by the drain because of the standing water issue. This year I changed that goal and created a garden for pollinators, which, hopefully, will survive and prosper. It would be nice for the City to erect a sign or two promoting this type of environmentally friendly garden (for others to emulate in the yards, businesses, schools, et al.). We can provide the content for you. Next Steps: That is up to all of you. Recommendations for your consideration: · Create a second community garden adjacent to the existing ECG, which could be located just to the NNW and accommodate at least another 55 plots. The existing parking lot should suffice. The area includes multiple (apartments-condos) housing units. · Create a community garden at Arneson Acres, which is not fully utilized, and could easily include 50-60 plots and still allow plenty of open/free space; · Create a community garden at Lewis Park adjacent to the existing kiddie garden (or perhaps closer and more accessible to the apartment units and those residents); · Create a community garden at Fred Richards (but not in a low-lying or swampy area); · Consider other under-utilized but viable, sustainable areas throughout the City for community/communal gardens; and · Encourage, promote school yard gardens at Creek Valley, which has lots of acres of under- used high-maintenance areas that could be used in a more productive, low-maintenance manner, and, by the way, used as a great outdoor educational venue for the kiddies’ learning experience—transferring book/classroom learning to experiential/outdoor learning. Process: Without making this a short-term career, consider scheduling a half-day/one-day walk-through, drive-by, with all or some of you (I would be glad to participate) to identify potential sites. What could be a viable site? Create a list. Prioritize the list to determine which potential sites could be developed easily and in a relatively short time (starting this fall?). Identify how many to develop the first, second, and third year. Establish a budget. Plan and coordinate what needs to be done, by whom, and when. Implement it. Then utilize the expertise of master gardeners to provide any education and guidance to ensure sustainability and economic success. We can do this at no cost to the city. As a reminder: All Master Gardeners are volunteers. We train the renters so they can maintain their own specific plots. We can even train you. We provide the guidance, the training, the support, the techniques to create a viable and sustainable garden environment. We take responsibility for helping the project succeed. The City takes responsibility for developing the area, providing the fencing, providing the water, and other amenities they want, such as benches, trash bins, recycle bins, etc. The City takes responsibility for ensuring the site is coordinated with whatever departments might be involved. The renters take responsibility for amending their individual plot(s), maintaining it, keeping the connecting pathways clear of weeds, and for cleaning up their plots at seasons’ end. Each party takes ownership of their part and for the success of the whole. Once the garden has been established, the time required by City employees is minimal. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Please take the time to consider including additional community gardens in Edina. Call on master gardeners to help you as best they can. I am available to clarify and help as best I can. Respectfully, Larry Cipolla 7021 Comanche Court From: Susan Phillips [mailto:susan.gardeningmatters@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:10 AM To: Larry Cipolla <cci1@visi.com> Subject: Re: Community Garden "numbers" Good morning all, So, the information in our data base is information that coordinators share with us on a voluntary basis, and while there are fields in our survey addressing some of those questions, often they are not filled out. I'll do my best to provide some answers to your questions. I am also attaching our 2015 Snapshot of Community Gardens and our Multiple Benefits document, which might be helpful to your advocacy efforts. We estimate there are 582 Community Gardens in the 7 county metro area. I would venture to say that is a conservative number. At least 290 of those are in Minneapolis (354 Hennepin County) and about 127 in St. Paul (158 in Ramsey County). Would you have a break-out of the various communal gardens, such as those associated with schools, churches, mosques, etc., corporate gardens, condo/senior high rise gardens, and so on. This is more difficult, as the data is voluntary, so take with a grain of salt: 46 gardens that are sponsored by/connected to a faith community8 corporate giving gardens 75 gardens that have a youth programming componentAnecdotally I know that ALL of the St. Paul Public Housing sites have community gardens. Several of MPHA's highrises do as well. I hope this is helpful, let me know if there is anything else we can do to promote your efforts. Have a great rest of the week, Susan Phillips Executive DirectorGardening Matters www.gardeningmatters.org612-821-2358 From:Kauffman Foundation To:James Hovland Subject:Invitation: 2016 Mayors Conference on Entrepreneurship Date:Thursday, July 14, 2016 9:03:31 AM The Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation in partnership with Mayor Rick Kriseman of St. Petersburg, Florida, invite you to the 2016 Mayors Conference on Entrepreneurship Diversifying Entrepreneurial Opportunity Why an inclusive ecosystem matters and how to make it happen December 1-2 Welcome Dinner – November 30 St. Petersburg, Florida Creating a vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystem requires more than attracting young founders of high-tech startups. Like all healthy ecosystems, it takes variety to thrive. Entrepreneurs come in all stripes and so do their companies. How can a city make entrepreneurial opportunities available to all? Join fellow mayors, economic development leaders and entrepreneurs from across the country at the Kauffman Foundation’s fourth annual Mayors Conference on Entrepreneurship. Held in partnership with Mayor Rick Kriseman of St. Petersburg, the event will explore how cities can build diverse, inclusive entrepreneurial systems that foster equitable economic growth. Strong ecosystems foster entrepreneurship in all its forms, from startup founder to seasoned entrepreneur; from male and female founders age 18 to post-retirement; from high-tech and retail to gig economy and emerging industries; from small shop to international conglomerate. Conference attendees will share insights into how to develop integrated policies, programs and networks that will create a fertile environment for inclusive entrepreneurship. The Kauffman Foundation will cover travel expenses, including airfare, hotel, meals and ground transportation while in St. Petersburg. REGISTER NOW to reserve your space. Seating is limited to 125. Learn more about the 2016 Mayors Conference on Entrepreneurship and view video from a previous event. This is an invitation-only event. Click here to unsubscribe from the Kauffman Foundation News and Announcements list. Click here to unsubscribe from all future Kauffman Foundation email correspondence. From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail; Janet Canton Subject:FW: Winter recreation at Braemer Date:Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:59:50 AM Please put in council and park board correspondence. Thank you! Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390 AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- From: Susan Parham [mailto:sp4526@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:24 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Winter recreation at Braemer Hello We are unable to come to the meeting tonight due to my upcoming surgery in the morning but we are in full support of a winter recreational area at Braemer Park. We live about 1 mile away and would use the cross country skiing/walking trails on a regular basis. Thank you. Susan and Bill Parham Life is short. Good life even shorter. Live, love and laugh all you can every day. Sent from my iPad ,or,® CenturyLink® Patrick Haggerty Director of State Regulatory and Legislative Affairs Phone 651-312-5630 June 17, 2016 City Manager, City of-Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Southwest Suburban Cable Commission do Moss and Barnett (BTG) 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Notice of Franchise violation — CenturyLink Dear Brian: I am writing this letter in response to your letter dated June 10, 2016, written on behalf of the Member Cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, giving notice of a claimed Franchise Violation of Section 7.1. The Notice claims CenturyLink failure to provide all seven PEG channels within180 days of each Member Cities effective date. However, as of this time, no violation of Section 7.1 has occurred. CenturyLink regards the letter as premature, and as a warning of a potential violation only, for the reasons stated below. Section 7.1 provides the Grantee 180 days from the effective date of each Member City franchise agreement to launch the PEG channels. The 180 day period to turn up the PEG channels has not expired for any of the Member Cities, therefore CenturyLink is not in violation of Section 7.1, and cannot be in violation, because the time for performance has not past. I understand that the letter was written in response to earlier communications between us, in which CenturyLink advised that its launch of an Access Channel was in jeopardy, and that if a channel did not get included in the current release it would not launch until November. However, please be advised that CenturyLink continues efforts to deliver all seven channels on time. CenturyLink has escalated the work and intends to launch the PEG channels, in the time period permitted by the franchise agreements. 200 South 5th Street, Room 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Page 1 of 2 www.centurylink.com Should CenturyLink's efforts not succeed, I will communicate with you further. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, Patrick Haggerty CC: City of Eden Prairie City of Hopkins City .otrviinnetonka City of Richfield Page 2 of 2 From:Monkey Zebe To:Edina Mail Subject:Gaga Ball Pit Date:Thursday, July 14, 2016 7:51:32 PM Dear Edina City Council, Hi! My name is Lily Simmons, and I was wondering what I can do for the city to build a gaga ball pit somewhere by Normandale Park. Like make a petition with a certain number of names on it or something similar. Thank you for taking your time to read this email, but I also ask if you could please write back as soon as possible. ~Thank you! From:Jack Ellingson To:James Hovland Subject:Building a Healthy Community through Mountain Biking Date:Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:14:52 PM Hello Mr Hovland, My name is Jack Ellingson. As a senior at Edina High School, I'm one of the captains of the Edina Cycling Team. I personally know the many benefits cycling can bring to a community. Cycling can unite and strengthen the mental, physical, and social health of a community. Cycling can also inspire kids to peruse careers in STEM by actively engaging them with the complex mechanics found on a bicycle. These are just a few of the many benefits cycling will bring to Edina. Unfortunately I was not able to make it to the city council meeting last Tuesday due to a commitment at work. This means I was unable to convey how much Edina wants mountain bike trails built at Braemar. I would be ecstatic if you would be wiling to meet with me to further discuss building trails at Braemar and the benefits they would bring to our community. Thanks,Jack Ellingson Captain of the Edina Cycling Team Leader of FIRST Robotics Team 1816 - The Green Machine From:beth.iacono@gmail.com To:James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:ranmeyer@outlook.com Subject:Fwd: ECC neighborhood construction update Date:Friday, July 15, 2016 12:07:28 AM Dear Mayor and Council Members, We hope you can help our neighborhood get some relief from actual and anticipated disruption caused by the construction of synthetic turf fields mere yards from our front doors. Since the first morning that we woke up to the surprise of unbelievably loud, vibrating construction activity that included several hundred, if not thousands, of large tractor loads (on the street for which we may still be paying a several thousand dollar assessment), we and our neighbors have been begging for/demanding the courtesy of collaboration and communication from Edina Schools. All we get is stonewalling and tiny bits of sometimes conflicting information provided in dribs and drabs. The message string below is just one example. The City of Edina takes such great care to ensure full communication and collaboration with the neighborhood when it comes to a (comparatively simple) residential tear-down. It holds neighborhood meetings for projects such as Weber Park. (It's ironic that school board member Randy Meyer is enjoying the benefit of the City's partnership on the Weber Park project in his own neighborhood.) Yet, our neighborhood can't seem to get any support, respect, or transparency in this situation that has the potential to continue to disrupt our lives on a long term basis. Edina Schools' lack of transparency leads us to assume the worst and have little trust at this point. There is a track record of Edina Schools installing a sign at Kuhlman Stadium that was out of compliance. Perhaps the same "ask for forgiveness rather than permission" approach is at play with regard to scoreboards, lights, (ugly) fencing, netting, tall poles, hours of operation, street parking, and all of the other issues on which we've tried to engage in constructive dialogue with Edina Schools. It's very frustrating that it seems like Edina Schools has free reign to ignore zoning, noise, and other ordinances, all to the detriment of our modest but great neighborhood. Any help or suggestions you can offer is most appreciated. Beth and Dave Iacono 4813 W. 59th Street Begin forwarded message: From: ", Construction" <Construction@edinaschools.org>Date: July 14, 2016 at 12:01:04 PM MST To: Jennifer Young <jenniferltyoung@hotmail.com>Cc: "honeybunnies@comcast.net" <honeybunnies@comcast.net>, "beth.iacono@gmail.com" <beth.iacono@gmail.com>, "EllenWestin@edinarealty.com" <EllenWestin@edinarealty.com> Subject: Re: ECC neighborhood construction update Jennifer - To follow up on previous message, there is not yet a timeline for installation of the scoreboard on the upper fields, only the scheduled prep/pouring of the footings for the unit. The scoreboard is approximately 5’ high and 14’ wide, with a possible additional “Edina” branding portion on the top (here is an example of what the board will likely look like once installed). And again, it will be on the east side of the fields, facing west. Susan From: "Brott, Susan K" Date: Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM To: Jennifer Young Cc: "honeybunnies@comcast.net", "beth.iacono@gmail.com", "EllenWestin@edinarealty.com" Subject: Re: ECC neighborhood construction update Jennifer - My bad – it is scheduled for installation on the EAST side facing WEST. Apparently I was directionally challenged last night when I composed the message. As for a graphical representation, attached are the architectural drawings for the upper fields and stadium renovations. I apologize that you had not received these earlier. I assumed they had been sent to you. Susan From: Jennifer Young Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 at 8:02 PM To: "Brott, Susan K" Cc: "honeybunnies@comcast.net", "beth.iacono@gmail.com", "EllenWestin@edinarealty.com" Subject: Re: ECC neighborhood construction update Hi Susan - a scoreboard on the west side of the field facing east would not face highway 100. Where are we currently at with getting a graphical representation of this project. I can't even remember how long now and how many emails or calls and different ways we have been asking for this. I cannot understand how a project of this size and scope is approved without one. It is either grossly negligent or simply not true and I'm pretty tired of the implication on your part that we wouldn't know this. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 13, 2016, at 5:37 PM, , Construction <Construction@edinaschools.org> wrote: Jennifer - Wanted to let you know that I am checking on the scoreboard for the upper fields. It is my understanding that there will be a LED scoreboard on the west side, facing eastward toward Hwy 100, but there are not plans for additional lighting or major signage on the upper fields (i.e., not like the stadium lights or scoreboard). Again, that is my understanding and I have requested confirmation and more details (e.g. size/dimensions) and will share with you as soon as I receive them. Susan From: Jennifer Young Date: Monday, July 11, 2016 at 4:42 PM To: "Brott, Susan K" Cc: "honeybunnies@comcast.net", "beth.iacono@gmail.com", "EllenWestin@edinarealty.com" Subject: Re: ECC neighborhood construction update So scoreboards are now a part of this field along 59th St? You had previously stated that there were no plans to put up lights or scoreboards. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 11, 2016, at 3:28 PM, , Construction <Construction@edinaschools.org> wrote: Pamela, Jennifer, Beth and Ellen - Here is the latest update on upcoming projects at the East Campus / Edina Community Center: Edina Community Center Project Update The following construction projects are planned this week at the Edina Community Center. All work is weather permitting. Kuhlman Stadium - Contractors are finishing the final grading and site prep for the new synthetic turf field in Kuhlman Stadium. FieldTurf is expected to start laying the carpet on Wednesday or Thursday, rolling out and seaming of which is anticipated to take about four-six days. This will be followed by phase two of the turf installation, the inlay work (logo, hash marks, numbering, etc), a process that takes about 3-5 days of hand glueing and finishing. The final phase will be the 3-5 day installation of the sand/silica/rubber infill. Upper Fields - Contractors are continuing the fine grading of top rock in preparation for the new synthetic turf fields. Other site prep, including sidewalks and scoreboard foundations, are expected to continue this week. Lower Field - Workers are finishing up the renovated shotput/discus area east of the stadium, with grass seeding expected later this week. District Maintenance Project Updates In addition to 2015 Transforming Spaces Referendum construction projects, the district is also continuing with planned maintenance projects at several sites. ECC Parking Lots - Crews are finishing the asphalt work of the Red (north) and Gold (south) lots at the Edina Community Center. Weather permitting, the district anticipates the lots reopening for parking next week, although finishing work will continue, including striping and installation of the lights. The Green lot (between ECC and South View MS) has been striped, with touch up and finishing work expected in the coming weeks. Concord Elementary Parking Lots - Contractors are continuing to update the sewer lines as well as complete resurfacing of both the upper and lower parking lots at Concord Elementary. Visitors are encouraged to use the lot at South View Middle School or Edina Community Center. The parking lots, including asphalt, striping and new lighting, is anticipated to be finished by the start of school. ——— Susan Brott, APR Director of Communications & Community Engagement Edina Public Schools (phone) 952-848-4038 (email) construction@edinaschools.org Stay up to date on Construction Updates: ONLINE - Construction Updates SOCIAL MEDIA - Follow @EPSConstruction on Twitter If the information in this email relates to an individual or student, it may be private data under state or federal privacy laws. This individual private data should not be reviewed, distributed or copied by any person other than the intended recipient(s), unless otherwise permitted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, any further review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this electronic communication or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received an electronic communication in error, you should immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. From:Ann Kattreh To:"Kristin Kiser Reichling" Cc:Edina Mail; Janet Canton Subject:RE: Proposed Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area Date:Friday, July 15, 2016 7:51:41 AM Attachments:image003.png Hi Kristin, Thank you for your feedback. I will forward your email to both the Park Board and City Council. Sincerely, Ann Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Kristin Kiser Reichling [mailto:kristinareichling@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 9:53 PMTo: Ann KattrehSubject: Proposed Braemar Park Winter Recreational Area Hello Ann, I am not in supportive of this proposal. I am an avid winter sports enthusiast; however, the benefits do not outweigh the detriments: Cost model with a break-even point 5-10 years out Noise and light pollutionSignificant, on-going required maintenance Material loss of trees and subsequently, wild lifeMan-made snow will blow on to Gleason Road, causing safety concerns and additional city plowingImpacts to residents who must clear man-made snow from their properties From what I can tell, the Edina HS nordic team seems to be the primary benefactor of this proposal. It doesn't appear that any other interest group is asking for this scale of added amenities. Further, we have many lakes and ponds in the city that have been deteriorating over time. We need to spend money maintaining our existing park land and water. Finally, the irony of this proposal is palpable: making man-made snow contributes to global warming, which causes warmer temperatures, which causes rain instead of snow and also results in temperatures that are too warm to make snow. It seems to me that this proposal is already baked and ready to go. I hope the City of Edina will seriously consider citizen input when making a decision on this proposal. From what I can tell based on the open house, there aren't too many citizens who are advocating for this other than those associated with the high school nordic team. Thank you for your time, Kristin ReichlingNormandale Park From:Karen Hazel To:Edina Mail Subject:Opposition to Braemar Winter Activities Development Plan Date:Friday, July 15, 2016 5:55:13 PM Good Afternoon City Council Members: I write to you all to express my opposition to the proposed re-development of the Braemar Golf Course to introduce Nordic ski trails for public and Edina Public School use. As a resident of the Braemar Hills area (right on Gleason Road, in fact), I attended the July 13th informational meeting with an open mind. After the meeting adjourned, I felt as if public trust in our community leaders had been somewhat breached. The basis for my objection to this proposal is multi-faceted. First, from a financial perspective, it is a losing proposition, aiming to "barely break even, hopefully within 5-7 years," as one presenter stated. It is clear, too, that the City will not likely recover its capital expenditure. On top of this, it translates to yet again more taxation of the voters/residents. As if that weren't enough, we learned that the plan, if implemented, would introduce both noise and light pollution, and potentially, a trespass on private property (in the form of unwanted ice crystals showering down on private homes and properties). Further, trees will die if this is implemented, but presenters were unable to provide more detail other than "probably hundreds (of trees)." The displacement and killing-off of wildlife is also a given, but presenters had little to offer on why the City would be willing to negatively impact green space for this purpose. To do this is entirely contrary to the City's stated objective--and promise to its residents--to become and remain a GreenStep City, "committed to taking proactive steps to improve the environment." (Source: City of Edina website, "Go Green" section.) How decimating precious acreage of nature and natural landscape, while draining water supply and running electrical equipment to create snow (ice) aligns with this stated commitment escapes me. There are other concerns, which appear to remain unaddressed. Some residents asserted at the meeting that the abandoned well that would be used to create snow is contaminated. Next, if this project were to come to fruition, adding 1.5' of snow to an elevated area would naturally mean runoff and melting...where would it go? Cascading down on Gleason Road to exacerbate icy conditions? As one resident discussed just today with Councilman Staunton, what about the "sinkage" risk? Drilling down to install huge piping and then draining underground reservoirs of water could create a potential "sinkage" risk to properties on Gleason Road and beyond, where that is already happening. This brings us to the public safety hazard spraying man-made ice crystals onto Gleason Road introduces to the public at-large. Gleason Road is a state-supported road, as you know, so there is no size-limitation to vehicles using it. We get it all: flatbed trucks, cement mixers, and motorists speeding to work in the icy, early morning hours. Check Edina Police records. We experience car crashes on Gleason every winter. Cars take out mailboxes, light posts, fire hydrants; one year, a motorist was side-swiped by a speeder and her car overturned after driving up the retaining wall. Is the City of Edina really willing to be in the business of spraying 1/8" - 1/4" of ice crystals on Gleason Road on top of already treacherous conditions? The City is already aware of the propensity for motor vehicle accidents on this road; last year, the City agreed to install a "25 mph" sign before the southbound curve on Gleason near Bonnie Brae, because of so many accidents. I would argue that should this project proceed and should catastrophe occur, and a child waiting for a school bus on Gleason become injured, the City would face the "knew or should have known" standard in the wake of such a tragedy. The residents around Braemar are now aware that in 2012, Craig Jarvinen, Edina Nordic Ski Team (then) Assistant Coach prepared an extensive proposal, which presumably was sent to the City, to construct a similar ski trail/s around Creek Valley Elementary. Obviously, that didn't happen. But this leads to the reasonable inference that this project has been gaining attention through sheer perseverance. While that's admirable, there is a glaring problem with "relocating" this endeavor to Braemar. First, this project smacks of entertaining the wants of a few at the expense, inconvenience and detriment of the many. Next, I would argue that the benefits of this proposed facility, if you will, are grossly eclipsed by the risks it would create to public safety, the material decline of quality-of-life for Braemar residents, and irrevocable injury to nature. Additionally, it seems as if those who support this idea, or say "Sounds fun!" are more likely to live in an Edina neighborhood that would not feel the pain of the construction, and the aftermath, of this endeavor. I ask each of you: if you lived in the Braemar or Dewey Hill neighborhoods, would you want to be across the street from the construction phase? Would you want to live within earshot of snow machines grinding for up to 5 hours a night??? Overnight lighting that requires you to shut blinds and shades to keep out? Please be assured we are not objecting to an effort to refine the nature/walking paths for biking, etc. Braemar was designed to create a natural, almost "sanctuary-like" option for residents to experience nature, sport and wildlife close by. But to rip up the natural landscape so 200 students "don't have to wake up at 6am to get to Hyland trails" (as cited by the coach who attended the 7/13 meeting) is not only insulting to those of us directly impacted, but it would also result in a disparate impact on our neighborhood, a diverse and growing community with residents from all walks of life. It is for this reason that many of us believe the Council should not equally weigh feedback from residents across the board, but rather, the Council should give greater weight and consideration to the voice of those residents most severely and directly impacted by this proposal. Braemar residents are now more aware of this proposal, and in light of the potential hazards, nuisances, trespasses, and decimation of natural land (not to mention the negative impact on property values), and the dismissive nature of the SEH consultant's presentation ("just go ahead and bump that extra ice off your own driveways, is all"), we are organizing to ensure that our opposition is heard and appropriately considered. We'll suggest an alternative approach: The City of Edina could partner with Bloomington to "sponsor" enhancements to Hyland in a co-op type arrangement that would afford EHS students improved access to the existing (and paid-for) trails just six minutes from Braemar. Creativity can go a long way to address the ski team's wishes. With all due respect, this project is problematic on so many levels, creating nothing short of upheaval for our neighborhood, for what seems like the novelty of mimicking a facility less than six-minutes from Braemar...it's difficult to find justification or reasoning as to why this would be a good idea. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Karen A. Hazel Edina From:Laura Kondrick To:Edina Mail; bstewart@edinamn.gov; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Ann Swenson; James Hovland Subject:Sidewalks vs Winter Recreation Area Date:Sunday, July 17, 2016 12:13:45 PM Dear Mayor and Council Members, I am strongly opposed the the proposed winter recreation area development. (June 21 City Council Meeting Presentation.) We can’t afford it! To date the city has spent/approved about $10 million in improvements to the Braemar golf course and clubhouse. The winter recreation area and its ongoing and expensive operations costs.would be on top of that1 I am in favor of accelerated sidewalk improvements. Sidewalks is where the money should go! Thank you for fairly reviewing this proposal against other priorities. Laura Kondrick 6115 Lincoln Drive, Unit 251, Edina, MN 55436 ---<--{(@ From:Nick Seivert To:Edina Mail Cc:Nicole kirkwood Subject:opposition to Braemar project Date:Sunday, July 17, 2016 6:08:12 PM Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, We are writing to express our concern and opposition to the proposed project to add cross-country ski trails and snow tubing hills at Braemar. My wife and I moved to Edina 2 years ago in anticipation of starting a family. I joined a small private practice group of doctoral level psychologists in Edina specializing in the evidence-based treatment of anxiety, my wife accepted the position of elementary/middle school counselor at Groves Academy, and we purchased a home at 6604 Gleason Road. We were drawn to Edina for its top-notch schools and reputation as a family-oriented, tight-knit community. Two months ago we were lucky enough to give birth to a healthy baby girl! While we remain excited to be a part of this community, we are becoming increasingly concerned about the safety of our family and neighborhood children as a result of two accidents on our property since October 2015, vehicles sliding into our yard/sidewalk on snowy winter days, other accidents up the road, and increased traffic and dangerous driving concurrent with the highway and high school construction. Proposing a project that would increase traffic on Gleason Road and compromise the driving conditions reflects a disregard for basic safety of the community. News of the Braemar development has come at a difficult time for us, a time at which we are particularly impassioned to advocate for safety issues. Two weeks ago we were witness to a horrific accident on our property that shook us to our core. A vehicle exiting from highway 62 traveled south on Gleason Road at a high speed, blew by stop signs and passed cars in the process, and swerved into our yard to avoid a head on collision with a northbound car containing a teenager and two children. In the process the vehicle broadsided a second car, sending it into a boulder wall in the middle of our yard, totaling the car and moving thousand- pound boulders. The vehicle then ran over a city rock wall and was launched over our driveway and our 5-foot retaining wall. It knocked over 4 trees before crumpling. I called the police; I was sure that the driver had just died in our new front yard. Everyone who witnessed the accident was shocked that the driver lived. We were extremely lucky that we did not leave for a walk down Gleason Road a minute earlier; our baby was already in her stroller and we were ready to go. This event may have been traumatic for residents of the neighborhood and should have been tragic. We are well aware of the dangers of living on a busy street that connects major highways. However, in the context of accidents on our property and neighborhood, as well as the obvious increased dangerous driving as a result of increased truck and pedestrian traffic on Gleason Road, we implore you to discontinue a project that would increase the chances of families and children being hurt or killed in our neighborhood. Sincerely, Nick Seivert and Nicole Kirkwood 6604 Gleason Road Edina, MN 55439 -- Nick Seivert, Ph.D., L.P. Licensed PsychologistAnxiety Treatment Resources 3300 Edinborough Way, Suite 650Edina, MN 55435 (952) 854-2622Fax: (952) 854-3293 DrNickSeivert@gmail.comwww.DrNickSeivert.com From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail; Janet Canton Subject:FW: winter recreation Date:Monday, July 18, 2016 8:30:47 AM For City Council and Park Board Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390 AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- From: Susan Schultz [mailto:susankschultzphd@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 6:37 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: winter recreation Hello Ann, I was unable to come to the meeting on Wed regarding the proposed winter recreational area at Braemar. I want to let you know that I think this is a good idea. It is not so clear to me how the man made snow trail could be built to be multi-use unless there are areas specified for each sport served. Nordic skiers are best served by a trail that has space for skate skiing and tracks for classic skiing. Fat tire bikes and walking on the nordic trails would make them difficult to ski. Susan Susan K. Schultz, Ph.D. Office: 952.842.0299 Mobile: 952.412.4472 From:Karen Griffith To:James Hovland Subject:Biking safely at 50th and France Date:Monday, July 18, 2016 2:44:08 PM Mayor Hovland, I'm contacting you today in hope of some safety solutions for the dangers to the community I have been exposed to while enjoying my neighborhood of 50th and France. I grew up here in Edina and have spent my life in this neighborhood at my mother's home for 50 plus years. She and my Father were leaders in the biking community throughout their lives. We have lived and loved this area because of its great walking area and destinations! Over this last summer we have found on many occasions that it is unsafe to walk on the sidewalks in and around the 50th and France area! Just last week at Mozza Mia while dining on their patio, we witnessed multiple groups of children with their parents riding through the wait staff. When I asked the server about the dangers, he commented "I take out a kid every summer! ". This to me is unsafe on so many levels! There are many more incidents that I could site for you! I think you can see that this is a serious problem! I'm hoping that with this communication between us that we can work to keep the community and it's retail members safe from any kind of serious injuries! Sincerely, Karen Griffith Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone From:Sudeith, Tim To:Edina Mail Subject:Meeting Today - Thank You Date:Monday, July 18, 2016 3:08:50 PM Attachments:image001.png Mt Biking in Edina Presentation V4.pptx Mayor Hovland, Thanks for taking the time to meet with us this morning about adding Mountain Bike Trails to the plan for Braemar. I think it would be an outstanding addition for the city and would increase the safety of the Mountain Bike Team. Attached is the presentation that we shared at the Park Board Meeting on July 12th. Again, thanks for your time this morning, I look forward to hearing any thoughts you may have on this project and if you have any questions, please don’t hesitate contact me via email (tsudeith@playcore.com) or via my cell at (612) 701-9020. Best, Tim Sudeith Senior VP and General Manager 1335 Mendota Heights Road Mendota Heights, MN 55120 651-665-9131 www.playcore.com The contents of this message and any attachments are proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged, and are intended solely for the use of the person(s) intended to receive this message. If you are not the intended recipient, then please be aware that any use of this message (including any copying, archiving, dissemination or distribution of this message) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender, delete this message and any attachments and destroy all records and copies of it. Thank you. The Ridges at Braemar 1 Build a premier, single track mountain bike trail system surrounding Braemar Park Add a significant community asset 2 30-inch wide path Winds through trees Follows topography of the land 3 Low Cost ◦Carver Lake Park, Woodbury 4 Coexist with Cross-Country Skiing Lebanon Hills Park, Eagan Theo Wirth Park, Golden Valley 5 More than 1 in 5 Americans age16 and over mountain bike (50+ million people total) Biking is the favorite outdoor activity of American children ages 6-17 There are 1.5 times more mountain bikers than golfers in America The voting strength of mountain bikers is more than 1/3 the voting strength of Americans age 65 and over Source: International Mountain Bicycling Association 6 37 years old (median) 71% college or post-graduate degree $62,000 household income (median) $75,000+ household income (33%) *International Mountain Bicycling Association 7 Minnesota high school mountain biking has grown 496% from 2012-2015 8 The East North Central* Bicycling Economy ◦Contributes $17 billion to the region ◦Supports 191,000 jobs ◦Generates $2.2 billion annual state and federal tax revenues ◦Produces nearly $12.1 billion in retail sales and services $873 million in bicycling gear and services $11.2 billion in bicycling trip-related expenditures ◦The region is home to over 11 million bicyclists – 33% of adult population *Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin Source: International Mountain Bicycling Association 9 Braemar is ideal ◦Incredibly diverse terrain Color-coded trails for different skill levels Independent of cross-country ski trails, but cross in places Year-round use – all 12 months 10 Estimated $120,000 ($21,000 per mile) 4 - 6 miles of dirt trail Most cost effective if done in conjunction with Braemar golf course renovation No buildings, asphalt, fields or electricity Trails designed to be low maintenance ◦Minimal maintenance handled by volunteers 11 Diversifies current park & recreation offerings Provides healthy and safe access to outdoors Attractive to all ages and genders Activity families can do together Positive economic impact on local businesses, especially Tin Fish 12 Edina Residents of All Ages ◦Community Needs Assessment Survey, 2014 1 in 5 respondents have a need for mountain biking trails 85% of respondents have a need for walking and biking trails 91% support walking and biking trails being developed Residents from Other Communities Edina Cycling Team 13 Edina Cycling Team ◦60 members ◦Fast growing ◦Up 100% from 2014-2016 ◦Travel for practices High School Team Middle School Team 14 Please ask the City Council to include mountain biking in the Braemar construction plan. 15 From:Michael R. Cashman To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Park - (a) Invasive Species Eradication at Braemar Park and (b) Clear Cutting on Braemar Park West Ridge Trail Date:Monday, July 18, 2016 3:45:12 PM Hi, I have previously communicated with the City Council regarding Braemar Park. My communication was triggered by the golf course renovation plan, and suggested that the City Council confirm or include buckthorn and invasive species eradication from border to border in Braemar Park as a general condition or deliverable before awarding bids to Richard Mandell and its subcontractors on July 19. Mandell et. al. should be asked to specifically confirm that buckthorn and invasive species is included for all of the East and West Ridges as promised on page 67 of his Master Plan (“Restore the Oak Woodland to the east [and west] of the golf by removing invasive species such as Buckthorn and restoring appropriate understory plantings . . .”). My communication was also intended to focus some attention on the improvement of existing walking trails in the West Ridges of Braemar Park, and the re-creation of a loop trail around the entire perimeter. In this regard, Mandell et. al. should be asked to confirm that his plan includes re- connecting the trails on both the north and south sides of the Park, as promised on page 68 of the Master Plan (“Establish a trail network surrounding the park . . . people value native plant communities for their beauty and the opportunities they afford for viewing wildlife and birds [since] residents of Edina have expressed a strong desire for more trails and accessible open spaces . . .”). If Mandell et. al. state that these deliverables are not included, they should be prioritized as an alternate, or undertaken with the money saved by the bids having come in lower than projected since the equipment will be on the property and cost savings and efficiencies can no doubt be best achieved while the rest of the golf course is being renovated. Furthermore, I am writing because another serious issue has come to my attention over this past weekend. Specifically, when I was walking West Ridge Trail near the Public Works Storage Barn on the southwest corner of Braemar Park, I discovered that a large area of Park property had been clear cut. Clear cutting means that every tree is removed, without exception. In the process, many mature Oaks were cut down. Those White, Red and Bur Oak trees were at least 40 years old. I estimate that 15-25 large trees, and many smaller trees (excluding invasive species such as buckthorn), fell under the ax. Those mature Oaks lined the West Ridge Trail, and represented the kind of Oak tree and Oak Woodland environment that the Mandell Renovation Plan was supposed to preserve and create. I have a video of the area, but have been unsuccessful in forwarding it. I will try to send it again, but the video does not do justice to the devastation wrought by the removal of many beautiful mature Oak trees. I encourage the Council members to go inspect the area themselves. This clear-cutting is right across the West Ridge Trail. It is inexplicable given the discussion that has been going on regarding the golf course renovation plans. The clear cutting cannot be part of the renovation plan, since bids have not yet been awarded and work has not started. The clear cut area is not connected to the golf course, but is in an area that has been identified on the renovation plans as a trail and nature area that was to be preserved. In fact, it has been stated publically and in the Mandell Renovation Plan that the West Ridge is protected by an agreement with the Army Corps of Engineers and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Given these facts, how and why is clear cutting occurring in Braemar Park? Nothing has been posted on any City website or information bulletin that I have seen. If there is any such publically available information or explanation for this clear cutting, please let me know. Otherwise, I kindly request that all further clear cutting be stopped until a full plan for Braemar Park is decided upon. I would appreciate a prompt reply to my inquiry on the clear cutting that has occurred in Braemar Park. Thank you and best regards, Michael R. Cashman Attorney at Law Direct dial: (952) 746-2118 mcashman@hjlawfirm.com 8050 West 78th StreetEdina, MN 55439Phn: (952) 941-4005Fax: (952) 941-2337 ***Privilege and Confidentiality Notice***This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the specific individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited and may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by reply electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message and any attachments without making any copies. Thank you. From:Michael R. Cashman To:Michael R. Cashman; Edina Mail Subject:RE: Braemar Park - (a) Invasive Species Eradication at Braemar Park and (b) Clear Cutting on Braemar Park West Ridge Trail Date:Monday, July 18, 2016 3:54:21 PM Here is the video mentioned in my email below. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ymf401njm3lua67/Video%20Jul%2017%2C%208%2007%2020%20PM.mov? dl=0 Michael R. Cashman Attorney at Law Direct dial: (952) 746-2118 mcashman@hjlawfirm.com 8050 West 78th StreetEdina, MN 55439Phn: (952) 941-4005Fax: (952) 941-2337 ***Privilege and Confidentiality Notice***This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the specific individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited and may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by reply electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message and any attachments without making any copies. Thank you. From: Michael R. Cashman Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 3:45 PMTo: 'mail@EdinaMN.gov'Subject: Braemar Park - (a) Invasive Species Eradication at Braemar Park and (b) Clear Cutting on Braemar Park West Ridge Trail Hi, I have previously communicated with the City Council regarding Braemar Park. My communication was triggered by the golf course renovation plan, and suggested that the City Council confirm or include buckthorn and invasive species eradication from border to border in Braemar Park as a general condition or deliverable before awarding bids to Richard Mandell and its subcontractors on July 19. Mandell et. al. should be asked to specifically confirm that buckthorn and invasive species is included for all of the East and West Ridges as promised on page 67 of his Master Plan (“Restore the Oak Woodland to the east [and west] of the golf by removing invasive species such as Buckthorn and restoring appropriate understory plantings . . .”). My communication was also intended to focus some attention on the improvement of existing walking trails in the West Ridges of Braemar Park, and the re-creation of a loop trail around the entire perimeter. In this regard, Mandell et. al. should be asked to confirm that his plan includes re-connecting the trails on both the north and south sides of the Park, as promised on page 68 of the Master Plan (“Establish a trail network surrounding the park . . . people value native plant communities for their beauty and the opportunities they afford for viewing wildlife and birds [since] residents of Edina have expressed a strong desire for more trails and accessible open spaces . . .”). If Mandell et. al. state that these deliverables are not included, they should be prioritized as an alternate, or undertaken with the money saved by the bids having come in lower than projected since the equipment will be on the property and cost savings and efficiencies can no doubt be best achieved while the rest of the golf course is being renovated. Furthermore, I am writing because another serious issue has come to my attention over this past weekend. Specifically, when I was walking West Ridge Trail near the Public Works Storage Barn on the southwest corner of Braemar Park, I discovered that a large area of Park property had been clear cut. Clear cutting means that every tree is removed, without exception. In the process, many mature Oaks were cut down. Those White, Red and Bur Oak trees were at least 40 years old. I estimate that 15-25 large trees, and many smaller trees (excluding invasive species such as buckthorn), fell under the ax. Those mature Oaks lined the West Ridge Trail, and represented the kind of Oak tree and Oak Woodland environment that the Mandell Renovation Plan was supposed to preserve and create. I have a video of the area, but have been unsuccessful in forwarding it. I will try to send it again, but the video does not do justice to the devastation wrought by the removal of many beautiful mature Oak trees. I encourage the Council members to go inspect the area themselves. This clear-cutting is right across the West Ridge Trail. It is inexplicable given the discussion that has been going on regarding the golf course renovation plans. The clear cutting cannot be part of the renovation plan, since bids have not yet been awarded and work has not started. The clear cut area is not connected to the golf course, but is in an area that has been identified on the renovation plans as a trail and nature area that was to be preserved. In fact, it has been stated publically and in the Mandell Renovation Plan that the West Ridge is protected by an agreement with the Army Corps of Engineers and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Given these facts, how and why is clear cutting occurring in Braemar Park? Nothing has been posted on any City website or information bulletin that I have seen. If there is any such publically available information or explanation for this clear cutting, please let me know. Otherwise, I kindly request that all further clear cutting be stopped until a full plan for Braemar Park is decided upon. I would appreciate a prompt reply to my inquiry on the clear cutting that has occurred in Braemar Park. Thank you and best regards, Michael R. Cashman Attorney at Law Direct dial: (952) 746-2118 mcashman@hjlawfirm.com 8050 West 78th StreetEdina, MN 55439Phn: (952) 941-4005Fax: (952) 941-2337 ***Privilege and Confidentiality Notice***This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the specific individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited and may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by reply electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message and any attachments without making any copies. Thank you. From:Katie Hetherington To:Valerie.Burke@edinaschools.org; simonetedina@aol.com Cc:James Hovland Subject:Re: Meeting Update Date:Monday, July 18, 2016 4:42:28 PM Dear Valerie, Thank you for your response. Since our meeting on Friday, May 20, our concern is still the lack of priority given to Edina residents for Edina programs. We were referred to you by Mayor Hovland because you have the decision making authority over matters related to Edina Community Education enrollment. In a nutshell, our position is that since user's fees do not entirely cover program costs, and since Edina taxpayers are funding the difference, it is only equitable that Edina residence be given first priority for these programs. Frankly, it is irrelevant what surrounding communities do in as much as these programs are primarily for the citizens of Edina, and are primarily funded by the citizens of Edina. Since Mayor Hovland has empowered you to make decisions on these matters and since you yourself acknowledged these inconsistencies in program registration, a workable solution with adequate priority for Edina residence is in order. A decision such as this is not arbitrary if it's in the interest of Edina residents and consistently applied across all programs. The Edina programs should not be managed to favor citizens of Bloomington, St. Paul, or any other city in the metro regardless of open enrollment goals; in return, I would expect my child NOT to receive priority programing in the surrounding communities. We live in Edina, we pay taxes in Edina: we don't live in Bloomington, so my child should not get priority there. Valerie do not misunderstand us, we are genuinely impressed with and big supporters of Edina's education programs in general. We are, however, extremely disappointed that it is so difficult to get our kids enrolled in these programs when there are other kids who don't live in Edina enrolled in them. We believe there is a fundamental administrative disconnect between the people who plan and execute these programs and the community. Since we last met, we have encountered another administrative glitch that illustrates and expands on this point. We enrolled our daughter Elizabeth in the Edina "Jazz and Tap (74-4)" class and purchased almost $60.00 worth of equipment that is REQUIRED by the class syllabus. When we arrived at the first class meeting on Wednesday, July 6, we discovered that the class was cancelled that week due to the holiday even though the catalog specifically says the class meets Wednesdays, July 6-August 10. We showed up on time, at the correct location and date specified in your catalog, with all the required class equipment. My daughter was in tears as we left the Community Center since she had been looking forward to this specific class all summer. We told her not to worry because we would be back next week for class. Unfortunately, the next day we received a voicemail from your staff stating that the class was cancelled for the rest of the term. (Try explaining that to a four year old.) This is completely unsatisfactory! We had arranged our entire schedule for the summer (July and August) around attending this class that meets at the highly inconvenient time of 5:15-6:00 PM on Wednesdays. There is zero excuse for a class to be cancelled after it's scheduled to have begun. We want to continue to be proponents of Edina Community Education, but you can see why it's becoming more and more difficult to do. We would appreciate your candid evaluation of these issues and prompt action to prevent similar issues from recurring in the future in accordance with the direction provided by Mayor Hovland. Best Regards, Katie Hetherington & Bill Simonet -----Original Message----- From: Burke, Valerie <Valerie.Burke@edinaschools.org> To: Katie Hetherington <khetherington737@aol.com> Sent: Wed, Jul 6, 2016 1:43 pm Subject: RE: Meeting Update Hello Katie, Thanks for checking back in – I had you on my tickler list to get back to as well. Here’s where I’m at. I’ve asked staff to gather information from the surrounding districts on how each of our program areas, adult, youth, pre-k – handles resident/non-resident registrations. I’ve got our internal information but I’m waiting on the external information. Here’s what I know thus far. Internally – our programs are inconsistent, which I’m not comfortable with. Especially our pre-k programs. Sometimes there’s been preference, sometimes there has not been. What I also know is that as a by-product of open enrollment and a strong age 0 to grade 12 alignment strategic plan thinking on this process in our district and around the metro has been changing. That’s why I want to gather data, talk to other area Director’s and to my Community Education Services Board before making an arbitrary decision. My goal is program consistency and to be able to explain the ‘why’ of our choice. Finally, I’ve asked about the number of complaints regarding this and asked staff to keep track formally. To date we have received one complaint to staff and 8 on our prior follow-up evaluation survey’s. All that said, I will have the metro data by early next week and then I will share the results with my Community Education Services Board – who advise on all things Community Education! We don’t meet until September I’m afraid, so I will not be able to confirm with you until then. We will not be doing any new registrations until January of next year – so there will be time between September and catalog production time to make changes to our processes if that’s what is decided. I want to thank you and Bill for bringing the inconsistencies to my attention. Our first CESB meeting is on Sept 22nd. I’ll put on my calendar to connect with you then. Let me know if you have further questions vb From: Katie Hetherington [mailto:khetherington737@aol.com] Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:25 PM To: Burke, Valerie <Valerie.Burke@edinaschools.org> Cc: simonetedina@aol.com Subject: Meeting Update Hi Valerie, Nice to see you in the hallway this week. Sorry we didn't get a chance to really chat. Bill and I wanted to follow up with you on our meeting from a few weeks ago. You were going to get back to us the middle of June on what your plans were for prioritizing Edina residents on the registration process. Can you give us an update? Hope you enjoy your holiday weekend. Bill Simonet and Katie Hetherington From:Michael R. Cashman To:Edina Mail Subject:RE: Braemar Park - (a) Invasive Species Eradication at Braemar Park and (b) Clear Cutting on Braemar Park West Ridge Trail Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 11:07:22 AM Mayor Hovland and Council Members, I have just spoken with Brian Olson, the Public Works Director. He explained that this portion of Braemar Park is being taken for use by the Public Works Department as a replacement for property located at 70th and Amundson Streets, which is being taken by the Three Rivers Park District for the Nine Mile Creek Trail. I understand the need for public works facilities, but it is very disappointing that park property is apparently being taken without any public comment or discussion as to whether it is appropriate or necessary to take park property for any reason. Parkland, public open space and natural habitat areas that were part of the Oak Savannahs and Woodlands in Edina is at a premium in a fully developed community such as ours. Natural parkland cannot be replaced once lost. There has likewise been no public notice or discussion about alternative locations for this kind of public works activity. This situation is even more disturbing given the clearly stated community priorities for the development and creation of more walking, biking and nature trails and habitats and the discussions about renovating the golf course and the creation of Oak Savannahs and Oak Woodlands throughout Braemar Park. In all the public forums over the last several years about the Nine Mile Creek Trail, the golf course renovation plans, and the winter recreation proposal, I am unaware of any public notice or discussion about taking part of Braemar Park for an expansion of the public works facility. I have been unable to locate a single mention of this proposal or project anywhere on the City, Three Rivers or Nine Mile Creek Watershed District websites. How could this happen without any public notice or discussion? How is it possible that this project has never been mentioned in all the discussions about the Nine Mile Creek Trail, the golf course renovations, the Oak Savannah and Oak Woodlands nature habitat plans, the mountain biking trail proposal or the winter recreation proposal? I respectfully suggest that serious consideration be given this evening to stopping this project immediately pending public discussion and approval. It may be too late to save the Oaks, but it is not too late for the Council to act to save precious Park property. I kindly request time to address this topic at the Council meeting this evening. Please feel free to call me at my office number below. You may also call my cell, which is 612-619-2783. Thank you and best regards, Michael R. Cashman Attorney at Law Direct dial: (952) 746-2118 mcashman@hjlawfirm.com 8050 West 78th StreetEdina, MN 55439Phn: (952) 941-4005Fax: (952) 941-2337 ***Privilege and Confidentiality Notice***This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the specific individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited and may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by reply electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message and any attachments without making any copies. Thank you. From: Michael R. Cashman Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 3:45 PMTo: 'mail@EdinaMN.gov'Subject: Braemar Park - (a) Invasive Species Eradication at Braemar Park and (b) Clear Cutting on Braemar Park West Ridge Trail Hi, I have previously communicated with the City Council regarding Braemar Park. My communication was triggered by the golf course renovation plan, and suggested that the City Council confirm or include buckthorn and invasive species eradication from border to border in Braemar Park as a general condition or deliverable before awarding bids to Richard Mandell and its subcontractors on July 19. Mandell et. al. should be asked to specifically confirm that buckthorn and invasive species is included for all of the East and West Ridges as promised on page 67 of his Master Plan (“Restore the Oak Woodland to the east [and west] of the golf by removing invasive species such as Buckthorn and restoring appropriate understory plantings . . .”). My communication was also intended to focus some attention on the improvement of existing walking trails in the West Ridges of Braemar Park, and the re-creation of a loop trail around the entire perimeter. In this regard, Mandell et. al. should be asked to confirm that his plan includes re-connecting the trails on both the north and south sides of the Park, as promised on page 68 of the Master Plan (“Establish a trail network surrounding the park . . . people value native plant communities for their beauty and the opportunities they afford for viewing wildlife and birds [since] residents of Edina have expressed a strong desire for more trails and accessible open spaces . . .”). If Mandell et. al. state that these deliverables are not included, they should be prioritized as an alternate, or undertaken with the money saved by the bids having come in lower than projected since the equipment will be on the property and cost savings and efficiencies can no doubt be best achieved while the rest of the golf course is being renovated. Furthermore, I am writing because another serious issue has come to my attention over this past weekend. Specifically, when I was walking West Ridge Trail near the Public Works Storage Barn on the southwest corner of Braemar Park, I discovered that a large area of Park property had been clear cut. Clear cutting means that every tree is removed, without exception. In the process, many mature Oaks were cut down. Those White, Red and Bur Oak trees were at least 40 years old. I estimate that 15-25 large trees, and many smaller trees (excluding invasive species such as buckthorn), fell under the ax. Those mature Oaks lined the West Ridge Trail, and represented the kind of Oak tree and Oak Woodland environment that the Mandell Renovation Plan was supposed to preserve and create. I have a video of the area, but have been unsuccessful in forwarding it. I will try to send it again, but the video does not do justice to the devastation wrought by the removal of many beautiful mature Oak trees. I encourage the Council members to go inspect the area themselves. This clear-cutting is right across the West Ridge Trail. It is inexplicable given the discussion that has been going on regarding the golf course renovation plans. The clear cutting cannot be part of the renovation plan, since bids have not yet been awarded and work has not started. The clear cut area is not connected to the golf course, but is in an area that has been identified on the renovation plans as a trail and nature area that was to be preserved. In fact, it has been stated publically and in the Mandell Renovation Plan that the West Ridge is protected by an agreement with the Army Corps of Engineers and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Given these facts, how and why is clear cutting occurring in Braemar Park? Nothing has been posted on any City website or information bulletin that I have seen. If there is any such publically available information or explanation for this clear cutting, please let me know. Otherwise, I kindly request that all further clear cutting be stopped until a full plan for Braemar Park is decided upon. I would appreciate a prompt reply to my inquiry on the clear cutting that has occurred in Braemar Park. Thank you and best regards, Michael R. Cashman Attorney at Law Direct dial: (952) 746-2118 mcashman@hjlawfirm.com 8050 West 78th StreetEdina, MN 55439Phn: (952) 941-4005Fax: (952) 941-2337 ***Privilege and Confidentiality Notice***This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the specific individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is prohibited and may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by reply electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message and any attachments without making any copies. Thank you. From:Wendy Fox To:James Hovland Subject:Braemar redevelopment Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 11:59:17 AM Dear Mayor Hovland- I am writing to you because I know that you care deeply about the welfare and happiness of the citizens of Edina. I am confident that, by writing to you, my thoughts won't fall on deaf ears. My husband and I are extremely opposed to the proposed redevelopment project at Braemar. It sounds like a private company is trying to sell Edina on an idea that has numerous negative ramifications with very little real benefit. We love the fact that we have deer and ducks and geese and so forth living in our neighborhood. From everything that I have read, this project will destroy an entire wildlife area in Braemar with hundreds, if not thousands, of trees being destroyed. We will be losing a large parcel of our green space, something that makes me extremely sad. We, the taxpayers, will have an increase, albeit small, in our property taxes to pay for this project, which will benefit only a very small portion of the population. When I read that snow making machines will operate in the evenings and that there will be blow-over to Gleason Road, causing the road to be slipperier than it already is, I couldn't believe my eyes. That road is already treacherous on winter days and the evening noise from the snow making machines will be an annoyance to everybody living near Braemar. I hope that you will be the voice of reason is this sea of craziness and that you will urge the Edina City Council to reject this idea by telling the corporation that is pushing for it, " Thanks, but no thanks." They stand to make a lot of money off of this project. The Edina cross country ski team members don't really need this facility and, unless you know something that I don't know about why we " need" this, it should be stopped. We are already a "premier" suburb and this project won't make us any better. It will only show our lack of concern for the environment and for the safety of our citizens. Sincerely, Wendy Fox From:Kelli Ahlberg To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Subject:Braemer Golf Course Nordic Ski Trail Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:04:53 PM Dear Edina City Council, I strongly oppose the decimation of natural forestry and wildlife at Braemar Golf Course to construct a Nordic ski trail. I do not support this endeavor as it injures precious green space, will create a public hazard due to snow-making machines, and is stated to be an expensive yet losing proposition financially. I ASK YOU TO VOTE NO ON THIS PROJECT. I ask that you consider more environmentally friendly (and less costly) ways to enhance Braemar for public use: mountain biking trails, hiking, etc. Please redirect this funding to other, higher- priority level projects that improve (not diminish) public safety, or which impose no such damaging impacts on the environment or residents. Thank you! Kelli 55439 resident New petition From:Joshua AhlbergTo:Edina MailSubject:New petition to you: KEEP EDINA"S BRAEMAR GREEN AND SAFE!Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:05:56 PM The Edina City Council – Joshua Ahlberg started a petition on Change.org and listed you as a decision maker. Learn more about Joshua Ahlberg’s petition and how you can respond. The Edina City Council: KEEP EDINA'S BRAEMAR GREEN AND SAFE! Petition by Joshua Ahlberg · Started Jul 19, 2016 City of Edina, Minnesota -- 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 5542 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL To the... Read more View the petition WHAT YOU CAN DO 1. View the petition Learn about the petition and its supporters. You will receive updates as new supporters sign the petition so you can see who is signing and why. 2. Respond to the petition Post a response to let the petition supporters know you're listening, say whether you agree with their call to action, or ask them for more information. 3. Continue the dialogue Read the comments posted by petition supporters and continue the dialogue so that others can see you're an engaged leader who is willing to participate in open discussion. CHANGE.ORG FOR DECISION MAKERS On Change.org, decision makers like you connect directly with people around the world to resolve issues. Learn more This notification was sent to Mail@EdinaMN.gov, the address listed as the decision maker contact by the petition starter. If this is incorrect, please post a response to let the petition starter know. Change.org · 548 Market St #29993, San Francisco, CA 94104-5401, USA From:Ann Kattreh To:Edina Mail; Janet Canton Subject:FW: Edin. Park Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:29:17 PM Attachments:image001.png Please send to the Park Board and City Council Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director952-826-0430 | Fax 952-826-0390AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: mickey wood [mailto:museumfan68@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 2:14 PMTo: Edina MailSubject: Edin. Park My family and I were recently located to Austin, MN. I was so delighted to find Edinborough Park. It was a life saver during the Winter and now during the hot days of summer. I never expected to be driving to Edina regularly. However, Edina has created something spectacular and it meets the specific need of MN citizens for a fun, safe and engaging space on cold, hot and rainy days. The Park also serves those from surrounding communities (such as Austin, MN). I can't recall anything like this in Des Moines or Chicago. Edina really keyed into the need of the public for a great, multifunctional indoor space that encourages both physical and emotional wellness. Edina has made it possible for families to have fun, become engaged and be activity regardless of the Minnesota weather. Well done. Thank you. Sincerely, Sheila Hanke Austin, MN From:Marcella McIntyre To:James Hovland Subject:Proposed Winter Recreation Area at Braemar Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 12:55:04 PM Dear Mayor Hovland: I recently became aware of the proposal for a winter recreation area at Braemar because of a letter that I received from Ann Kattreh, Director of the Edina Parks and Recreation Department. I was unable to attend the July 13th meeting to discuss the project, but did watch the June 21 City Council meeting at which Ms. Kaltreh, Paul Pasko, SCH Engineering, and Dave Belin, RRC Associates, spoke about the proposal. I am writing to share my concerns about the proposed project. I have also written separately to Director Kattreh. First, as a resident of the Braemar Hills neighborhood, I’m concerned about the potential negative impact on the neighborhood due to increased noise, light and traffic. My understanding is that there will be noise caused by snow-making machines that will run at least twice per season as well as the trail grooming which will be done every night. The grooming machines have a noise level that is the same as larger lawn mower and it will be done at night after the trails close. There is also the negative impact of the 12- foot light poles with LED lights that will be placed every 100 feet or so along the trails. Homes on Gleason Road and Tanglewood Court will see spray from blowing snow and ice. I’m also concerned by the plans to host events at the new space and the increased traffic and congestion in the neighborhood that they could bring. What is the planned frequency of such events? Next, this project presents environmental and health risks. The proposed cross-country trails will be 25 feet wide, as they will need to be wide enough for large snow-making equipment to fit. How many trees will need to be destroyed for this to be accomplished? I’m concerned about the destruction of the wooded area and loss of habitat. What is being done to minimize this destruction? Further, the proposal includes using an existing municipal well for snow making. This well has known radon issues and no longer supplies water to city for that reason. Have there been any studies done on the potential hazards of using this well for snow making? Radon gas is a known carcinogen. Additionally, given the size of the snowmaking equipment, transformers and fuse boxes, and the amount of water needed, snow making is not an environmentally friendly endeavor The overall financials also seem problematic. The project has an estimated cost of $3M. With both tubing and Nordic (the stronger option), the project would barely break even in year one and would barely be making a profit in year five. The financial models presented are largely dependent on the tubing hills – and as Mr. Pasko noted, Nordic is not a money maker; tubing is. However, the success of the tubing hill and demand for this type of winter recreation area also seem speculative. The consultants admitted that the proposed 25-foot hills are smaller than comparative hills in the area (and they proposed charging less than other regional hills because of this), and both you and Mr. Stewart questioned whether that size hill would even be a draw for visitors. In addition, when questioned about the market and demand for this type of recreation area, Mr. Belin did not provide concrete numbers but indicated that there “seems” to be a big demand for the winter activities based on his conversations with various individuals. It was unclear whether there were associations that could be a potential revenue stream for the ski trails like the many youth and other groups who use the Braemar sports dome. There are also many existing trails nearby. Just south of the proposed trail, the Hyland area in Bloomington has great downhill skiing and snowboarding and approximately 10.8k of cross-country ski trails. Further, www.skiinyski.com shows additional cross- country ski trails that are nearby, including 7.5k at Starling Lake in Eden Prairie, 4k at Woodlake in Richfield and 25K at Theodore Wirth Park in Minneapolis. Can this area support another winter ski area and one that we plan to charge people a premium for (Mr. Belin indicated that they anticipate having a higher daily ticket price for cross-country than other facilities in the area)? What market research has been done? I believe the parks and natural areas in Edina are one of our city’s greatest assets. The natural, untouched woods to the east of Braemar golf course are one of these assets. I don’t think we should rush to build a winter recreation area that residents do not need nor want just because the golf course will be under construction and the high school ski team is apparently in need of a practice area (though they are able to practice at Hyland one day per week). As Ms. Brindle said at the July 21 meeting, this project is not in the budget. It also will not be “cherished” by Edina residents. Thank you for consideration. Very truly yours, Marcella McIntyre 6920 Gleason Road From:Sabre Family To:Edina Mail Subject:Proposal VERY BAD IDEA- NO Thanks!! Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:11:20 PM After receiving a paper in my mailbox explaining the proposal for Winter rec braemar and the details of the proposed project, I am appalled that the city would even consider such a ridiculous waste of money! To pay to ruin our city and green space is an atrocity! We would be stuck with visual pollution is the space where our gorgeous trees are located. As we bike and walk along Braemar on almost a daily basis, this is a horrendous idea and I am guessing that someone is set up to make a pocket full of money if this is approved?? Shame on them!!! Please take this off the table and close it down now! Regards,Mary Sabre 5811 Shannon DriveEdina, 55439 From:Bean, Babette To:Edina Mail Subject:Braemar Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:22:33 PM Dear Council Members, Why are you saddling future residents with this Nordic project that is not needed in EDINA? Can't you landscape France Avenue, fix up Southdale mess, and improve downtown Edina sidewalks, ramps and streets?There are many places for Nordic skiing in Minnesota and our Creek is also ideal for that. Who is dreaming up this crazy project for the city of Edina? Money is not being well spent. The upkeep will be so expensive and for what??Please do not allow this to transpire. Thank you. Sincerely,Babette Bean952-924-8722, RealtorChairman's CircleClick here to download my mobile app to find homesSent from my iPad New signatures From:mail@changemail.orgTo:James HovlandSubject:5 more people signed “The Edina City Council: KEEP EDINA"S BRAEMAR GREEN AND SAFE!”Date:Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:28:10 PM James Hovland – This petition addressed to you on Change.org has new activity. See progress and respond to the campaign's supporters. The Edina City Council: KEEP EDINA'S BRAEMAR GREEN AND SAFE! Petition by Joshua Ahlberg · 5 supporters 5 more people signed in the last 2 hours View petition activity RECENT SUPPORTERS Pat Robertson Minneapolis, MN · Jul 19, 2016 I oppose the planned Nordic Ski Trail in Braemar Gold Course Connie Bowen Minneapolis, MN · Jul 19, 2016 This is not in the best interest of the neighborhood or of Edina, since taxes will increase. This project is not fiscally sound. Leslie Vogel Minneapolis, MN · Jul 19, 2016 John Swon Minneapolis, MN · Jul 19, 2016 Nicole Kirkwood Minneapolis, MN · Jul 19, 2016 View all 5 supporters CHANGE.ORG FOR DECISION MAKERS On Change.org, decision makers like you connect directly with people around the world to resolve issues. Respond to let the people petitioning you know you're listening, say whether you agree with their call to action, or ask them for more information. Learn more. This notification was sent to jhovland@EdinaMN.gov, the address listed as the decision maker contact by the petition starter. If this is incorrect, please post a response to let the petition starter know. Change.org · 548 Market St #29993, San Francisco, CA 94104-5401, USA Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes, Other From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Board and Commission 2nd Quarter Attendance Report Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Quarterly there will be a membership attendance report provided to the City Council for review. This report is in lieu of staff liaisons including a monthly report as the last page of their approved minutes. This report includes the months of April, May, and June. ATTACHMENTS: Description Q2 Board and Commission Attendance Report J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs.Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 NAME TERM (Enter Date)(Enter Date) La Valleur, Barbara 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Miller, Anne 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 67% Gunness, Cheryl 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Suckow, Steve 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 4 67% Zabala Tavenas, Adriana 3/1/2019 1 1 1 3 83% Lappin, Dana 3/1/2018 1 1 1 3 50% Meifert, Ray 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Ellis, Kandace 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 67% Chaffee, Stella 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 4 100% Chen, Olivia (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 3 50% Osman, Farhia (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 3 50% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS:Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting*Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. ARTS & CULTURE COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs.Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 NAME TERM (Enter Date)(Enter Date) Bothun-Hurley, Melinda 3/1/2017 1 1 2 33% Weston, Connie 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 100% Pence, Alison 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Zilka, Christy 3/1/2019 1 1 1 3 83% Schultz, Caleb 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 4 100% Cozad, Cathy 3/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Conner, Kristen 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 67% Orr, Britta 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Sarles, Steve 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 4 67% Sokol, Nina (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Jessica Hong (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS:Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting*Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line.There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs.Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 NAME TERM 3/15/2016 (Enter Date) Burmeister, Jeff 3/1/2019 1 1 1 3 75% Glahn, William 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Horan, Michelle 3/1/2017 1 1 1 3 75% Jackson, Carolyn 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 4 100% Kostuch, Keith 3/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Manser, Richard 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Mohanty, Sonat 3/1/2017 1 1 1 3 75% Satterlee, Lauren 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Seeley, Melissa 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Waddick, Louise 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Zarrin, Sarah 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% 0 0% Reinke, Emily 9/1/2016 1 1 1 3 50% Stefanik, Sarah 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 67% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS:Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting*Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line.There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs.Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 NAME TERM (Enter Date)(Enter Date) Loving, Scott 3/1/2019 1 1 100% Christiaansen, Jennifer 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Moore, Bob 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% Sussman, Peter 3/1/2018 1 1 1 3 43% McLellan, Bruce 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Birdman, Michael 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Kelly, Karen 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% Pearson, Colleen 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% Nymo, Sarah 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 4 80% Otness, Peter (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% Puerzer, Payton (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS:Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting*Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line.There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs.Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 NAME TERM 7/19/2016 (Enter Date) Arseneault, Pat 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Rinn, Sarah 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 67% Kennedy, Ellen 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 67% Vecchio-Smith, Maggie 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Meek, Michelle 3/1/2019 1 1 1 3 83% Martin, Kristina 3/1/2019 1 1 1 3 83% Edwards, Cindy 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 4 100% Edelson, Heather 3/1/2017 1 1 1 3 83% Beringer, Catherine 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 100% Ramesh, Sid (student)9/1/2016 1 1 17% Kearney, Caitlin (student)9/1/2016 1 1 2 33% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS:Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting*Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line.There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S O N D Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs.Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 NAME TERM 06/07/20161 (Enter Date) Dahlien, Matt 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Gieseke, Dan 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Good, Greg 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Greene, Gerry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% McAwley, Eileen 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 4 75% McCormick, Brenda 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Meyer, Randy 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Miller, Michael 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Hawk Nelson, Koren 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Strother, Julie 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Crist, Lauren (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Lohani, Aanik (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS:Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting*Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line.There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. PARK BOARD Work Session Work Session # of Mtgs.Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 NAME TERM (Enter Date)(Enter Date) Hobbs, Steve 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 83% Olsen, Jo Ann 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 100% Lee, Susan 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 92% Platteter, Michael 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 100% Bennett, Jimmy 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 100% Hamilton, John 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Thorsen, Todd 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 100% Strauss, Gerard 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 92% Nemerov, Ian 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 100% Ma, Amy 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 83% Kivimaki, Peter 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 100% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS:Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting*Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line.There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. O N D PLANNING COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S J F M A M J J A S O N D SM WS # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 NAME TERM (Date)6/21 Bass, Katherine 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Boettge, Emily 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Brown, Andy 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Iyer, Surya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Loeffelholz, Ralf 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 71% Janovy, Jennifer 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Miranda, Lou 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Olson, Larry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Ding, Emily (student)9/1/2016 1 1 2 29% Ruehl, Lindsey (student)9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 57% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS:Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting*Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line.There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, February 25, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Please review the Arts & Culture Commission February 2016 minutes. INTRODUCTION: Please review the Arts & Culture Commission February 2016 minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes, Arts & Culture Commission 2016-02-25 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 26, 2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Arts and Culture Commission Edina City Hall Community Room February 25, 2016 4:30 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Meifert called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Cheryl Gunness, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, and Steve Suckow. Commissioners Absent: Kandace Ellis, Daniel Li and Kitty O’Dea. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center. Student Representatives Present: Farhia Osman. Student Representatives Absent: Olivia Chen. Guests Present: George Sutton, Sutton & Associates; and Sara Shaylie, Sutton & Associates. III. Introductions The members of the Commission and guests introduced themselves. IV. Approval of Meeting Agenda Chair Meifert noted the meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. No additions to the agenda voiced. Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner La Valleur that the Arts and Culture Commission approve the February 25, 2016 Agenda as presented. Ayes: Cheryl Gunness, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. V. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting of January 28, 2016 Chair Meifert asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 28, 2016. No changes voiced. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 26, 2016 Motion by Commissioner Miller and seconded by Commissioner Gunness that the Arts and Culture Commission approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Ayes: Cheryl Gunness, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. VI. Community Comment No comments made. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Elections Chair Meifert stated that he had served his second and final term as Chair. He opened the floor for nominations. Motion by Commissioner Suckow and seconded by Commissioner La Valleur that the Arts and Culture Commission appoint Anne Miller as Chair of the Commission. Ayes: Cheryl Gunness, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. Motion by Commissioner La Valleur and seconded by Chair Meifert that the Arts and Culture Commission appoint Cheryl Gunness as Vice Chair of the Commission. Ayes: Cheryl Gunness, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. B. Grandview The Arts & Culture Commission discussed the Grandview Community Center project with consultants George Sutton and Sara Shaylie, both of Sutton + Associates. C. Donations and Sponsorships Staff Liaison Frey distributed a draft brochure developed for the Commission. The Commission was asked to review the document and provide feedback. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions A. Volunteer Recognition Packet and Dinner Staff Liaison Frey distributed the Volunteer Recognition packet and asked nominations to be returned by March 11th. B. General Manager’s Report Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 26, 2016 The Staff Liaison thanked Kitty O’Dea for her six years of service to the Commission and Art Center Board. Mr. Frey stated Daniel Li had resigned from the Commission as he has moved outside of Edina. The April meeting will be a joint meeting with the Arts and Culture Commission and the Park Board with members of the Task Force present. The meeting will take place on April 12, 2016. C. Music in Edina Report The Music in Edina Report was included in the packet. D. Public Art Edina Report The Public Art Edina Report was included in the packet. E. Ways & Means Report The Ways & Means Report was included in the packet. IX. Chair And Member Comments Chair Meifert stated that he has enjoyed his time as Chair of the Commission and looked forward to supporting the newly appointed Chair. Commissioner Miller thanked Chair Meifert and for the contributions he has made, specifically the development of the Ways & Means Committee. X. Staff Comments No comments. XI. Adjournment Motion by Chair Meifert and seconded by Commissioner Suckow that the Arts and Culture Commission adjourn the meeting at 5:45 p.m. Ayes: Cheryl Gunness, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, and Steve Suckow. Motion carried. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, March 24, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Please review the Arts & Culture Commission March 2016 minutes. No business was conducted due to a lack of a quorum. INTRODUCTION: Please review the Arts & Culture Commission March 2016 minutes. No business was conducted due to a lack of a quorum. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes, Arts & Culture Commission 2016-03-24 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 26, 2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Arts and Culture Commission Edina City Hall Community Room March 24, 2016 4:30 p.m. I. Call To Order Vice-Chair Gunness called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. No business was conducted due to a lack of a quorum. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Stella Chaffee, Cheryl Gunness, Barbara La Valleur and Adriana Zabala Tavenas. Commissioners Absent: Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller and Steve Suckow. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center. Student Representatives Present: Olivia Chen and Farhia Osman. III. Introductions The standing members and new members of the Commission introduced themselves. IV. Approval of Meeting Agenda The meeting agenda was not approved. V. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting of February 25, 2016 The February minutes were not approved. VI. Community Comment No comments made. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Grandview Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 26, 2016 Staff Liaison Frey presented the Edina Grandview Community Center Task Force Meeting Document and Site-Fit Plan from March 10, 2016. VIII. Chair And Member Comments No comments. IX. Staff Comments No comments. X. Adjournment The meeting concluded at 5:25 p.m. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.3. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, April 12, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Please review the Arts & Culture Commission April 2016 minutes. The meeting was a joint meeting with Park Board. INTRODUCTION: Please review the Arts & Culture Commission April 2016 minutes. The meeting was a joint meeting with Park Board. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes, Arts & Culture Commission 2016-04-12 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: May 26, 2016 1 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Arts and Culture Commission & Park Board Braemar Golf Course April 12, 2016 I. Call To Order Chair McCormick called the April 12, 2016 Joint Meeting of the Arts & Culture Commission and Park Board meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call for the Park Board were Chair McCormick, Members Dahlien, Gieseke, Good, Greene, McAwley, Meyer, Miller, Nelson, Strother and Student Members Crist and Lohani. Answering roll call for the Arts & Culture Commission were Chair Miller, Members Chaffee, Ellis, Gunness, LaValleur, Meifert and Suckow. Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Support Specialist Janet Canton and Edina Art Center General Manager Michael Frey; Consultants Victor Pechaty, HGA Architects; George Sutton, Sutton + Associates. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Good to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Gieseke. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes The Arts & Culture Commission will approve February and March minutes at their next meeting. V. Community Comment None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Grandview Facility Site Fit Victor Pechaty, from HGA, gave a power point presentation of the two options for the Grandview Facility Site. The Park Board and Arts & Culture Commission gave their feedback and asked questions regarding the two options. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes ☒ Approved Date: May 26, 2016 2 Mr. Pechaty indicated that he will take the feedback of what is and is not working for his final report. He stated the purpose of this meeting is to provide several data points from a potential design to go to the City Council. He indicated the final report will be a document that will provide data that will be useful in the future process to make decisions. The Arts & Culture Commission convened in the Tin Fish Restaurant to finish their meeting. VII. Correspondence and Petitions None VIII. Chair and Member Comments Chair Miller thanked Mr. Sutton and other members of the Task Force present for their work on the Grandview Task Force. IX. Staff Comments None X. Adjournment Motion made by Suckow with second by Member Ellis to adjourn the April 12, 2016 meeting at 9:12 p.m. Motion carried. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.4. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Michael Frey, Art Center General Manager Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, May 26, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Please review the Arts & Culture Commission May 2016 minutes. INTRODUCTION: Please review the Arts & Culture Commission May 2016 minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes, Arts & Culture Commission 2016-05-26 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: June 23, 2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Arts and Culture Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers May 26, 2016 4:30 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Anne Miller called the meeting to order at 4:32 p.m. II. Roll Call Vice-Chair Cheryl Gunness conducted roll call. Commissioners Present: Stella Chaffee, Kandace Ellis, Cheryl Gunness, Barbara La Valleur, Dana Lappin, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Steve Suckow and Adriana Zabala. Student Representatives Present: Olivia Chen. Student Representative Absent: Farhia Osman. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion by Commissioner La Valleur and second by Commissioner Suckow to approve the agenda. Motion passed unanimously. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meetings of February 25, March 24 and April 12, 2016 Motion by Commissioner Ellis and second by Commissioner La Valleur to approve the two sets of minutes. Motion passed unanimously. V. Community Comment No comments made. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Introductions New members Stella Chaffee and Adriana Zabala introduced themselves. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: June 23, 2016 B. Grandview Staff Liaison Frey reported on the May 17 City Council meeting and the Edina Grandview Community Center. C. Public Art Edina Commissioner La Valleur reported on sculpture installations for 2016. Motion by Commissioner La Valleur with second by Commissioner Zabala to approve seven new members to Public Art Edina; Britt Eyngorn, Gary Hittle, , Kevin Komadina, Joan O’Brien, Philip Schimke, Cory Shubert, Forrest Simonson. Motion passed unanimously. D. Art on the Move Commissioner Gunness reported on the new working group that has four members with interest. The date for the first meeting has not been set. E. Music in Edina Commissioner Ellis reported on three Summer Music in the Parks series. The dates are July 15, 29, and August 19. The local musicians will be Homeward Bound at Arneson Acres, Blue Mood at Braemar Clubhouse, and The Percolators at Todd Park. F. Ways & Means Committee Commissioner Meifert had no report stating the next meeting would be in July. VI. Chair and Member Comments Chair Miller thanked retiring Commissioner O’Dea and current Commissioner Meifert. Both received awards at the Annual Volunteer Appreciation Dinner. VII. Staff Comments General Manager Frey thanked the commission and student members for their service. VIII. Adjournment The meeting concluded at 5:25 p.m. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: June 23, 2016 Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.5. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Commission Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Community Health Commission, April 11, 2016 & May 9, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: Minutes from April 11 and May 9, 2016 Community Health Commission Meetings. ATTACHMENTS: Description April 11 CHC Minutes May 9 CHC Minutes MINUTES Community Health Commission April 11, 2016 at 6:30 PM City Hall, Community Room I.Call To Order A.New CHC Picture for Website II.Roll Call Attending: Caleb Shultz, Alison Pence, Britta Orr, Kristen Conner, Melinda Bothun-Hurley, Connie Weston, student members Nina Sokol and Jessica Hong. Staff: Jeff Brown Absent: Christy Zilka, Steve Sarles, Cathy Cozad. III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Melinda Bothun-Hurley to approve meeting agenda. Seconded by Connie Weston. Motion Passed. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Caleb Schultz to approve meeting minutes. Seconded by Allison Pence. Motion Passed. A.March 14, 2016 Draft Minutes V.Community Comment VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Tri-City Meeting Discussion/Report Update from Alison Pence and Staff Liaison Brown regarding the tri-city meeting. Minutes from meeting included in meeting agenda. VII.Correspondence And Petitions VIII.Chair And Member Comments Discussed latest concerns regarding Zika virus and that effects may be more severe than previously thought. Discussed sugar sweetened beverage taxes, and avenues for bringing idea forward to council. Work session on August 16th may be forum for discussion. IX.Staff Comments A.Field Turf Update B.Traffic Safety Update C.MDH Videoconference - Flint Water Crisis Discussed annual videoconference between MDH Commissioner Ehlinger and local elected officials. This year's topic is the Flint Water Crisis. CHC membership is invited to attend the videoconference on Tuesday, May 3rd. X.Adjournment Meeting Adjourned by Chair Orr. MINUTES Community Health Commission May 9, 2016 at 6:30 PM City Hall, Community Room I.Call To Order II.Roll Call Present: Cathy Cozad, Alison Pence, Steve Sarles, Caleb Schultz, Christy Zilka, Connie Weston, Student Members: Jessica Hong and Nina Sokol. Staff: Jeff Brown. Absent: Melinda Bothun-Hurley, Kristen Conner. III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda No additions or edits. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Connie Weston to approve minutes from April 11th CHC meeting. Seconded by Alison Pence. Motion Passed. A.April 11, 2016 CHC Minutes V.Community Comment VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Joint Work Session Topics/Workplan Update Discussed possible topics for joint work session with City Council on August 16th at 6:15 pm. - Mental health and wellness initiative at EPS - Participation in comprehensive plan process, Health-in-all-policies concepts. - City-specific health data. B.Turf Update - Media Discussed recent news articles from various media sources. C.Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant D.Sugar Sweetened Beverages Info Discussion of possible tax and approach to council on this issue at joint work session in August. VII.Correspondence And Petitions VIII.Chair And Member Comments Member Pence: Article regarding cancer cluster in St. Louis Park and a perceived relationship to groundwater contamination on the St. Louis Park/Edina border. CHC expressed interest in how the City is tracking this issue. IX.Staff Comments A.EPS Mental Health and Wellness Initiative Update School Board will be reviewing proposal at June meeting, announcement of program implementation will happen after that meeting. Plan is for 2 vendors to provide service, based on age of students. B.Upcoming Meetings X.Adjournment Meeting adjourned by Chair Orr. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.6. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission May 24, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Minutes of the May 24, 2016 Human Rights and Relations Commission Meeting are attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission, May 24, 2016 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: June 28, 2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights and Relations Commission Edina City Hall, Community Room May 24, 2016 7:00pm I. Call To Order Chair Arseneault called the May 24, 2016 Human Rights and Relations Commission meeting to order at 7:02 PM. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Arseneault, Commissioners Beringer, Edelson, Edwards, Kennedy, Martin, Meek and Vecchio-Smith. Staff present: HRRC Staff Liaison MJ Lamon. Absent Members: Commissioners Rinn and Student Commissioners Kearney and Ramesh. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Vecchio-Smith to approve the Human Rights and Relations May 24, 2016 meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Martin. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Kennedy to approve the April 26, 2016 meeting minutes. Motion seconded by Vecchio-Smith. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. 2016 Work Plan Updates 1) Sharing Values, Sharing Community • Committee shared proposal for Sharing Values and Community event: A Conversation with Religious Leaders about Faith, Joy and Appreciation • Committee is connecting with possible panelists • Event Date: A Wednesday evening in September 2016 • Location: Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes 2) Website • Committee is working on the Days of Remembrance webpage • Committee plans to review other cities HRRC pages as we update ours Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: June 28, 2016 3) Human Rights City Designation • Working group connected with Human Rights City organizational contact for information on the procedure for becoming a Human Rights city; there are no specific qualifications or hurdles. If a city chooses to take on the Human Rights City designation, it means the city is agreeing to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights framework as part of the city’s core mission. • Working group is in process of connecting with Human Rights City Designations steering committees to gather information on best practices for focusing on a city’s challenges B. 2017 Work Plan Ideas 1) Senior Assessment Study Update / Moving towards an age agreeable city 2) Transgender Issues awareness / education (e.g., what does it mean to be transgender / issue of self-identity / bathrooms/locker rooms issue) 3) Issues facing residents of color / addressing racism in policing and other areas VII. Correspondence And Petitions None VIII. Chair And Member Comments Vecchio-Smith shared her observations regarding a recent school project in which fifth graders commented on their experiences including racism; Kennedy noted the Edina city police department’s Citizens Academy will begin in September on Thursday evenings. IX. Staff Comments None. X. Adjournment Motion by Kennedy to adjourn the May 24, 2016 HRRC meeting at 8:44 PM. Motion seconded by Beringer. Motion carried. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.7. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, Engineering Specialist Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Transportation Commission, May 19, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive the minutes the Edina Transportation Commission for May 19, 2016. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes, ETC, May 19, 2016 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 6/16/2016 1 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Room May 19, 6:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair LaForce called the meeting to order. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Boettge, Brown, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Miranda, Olson and Ruehl. Absent at roll call were members Bass, Ding and Loeffelholz. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by member Olson and seconded by member Boettge approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by member Brown and seconded by member Olson approving the edited Apr. 21, 2016, minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions And Presentations A. Grandview District Transportation Study Presentation Ms. Lydia Major, Ms. Zabe Bent, and Mr. Michael Fisher presented an update on the Grandview District Transportation Study which just completed the final phase of the study, recommend week. Ms. Major gave an overview of past phases which included convene week and imagine week. Ms. Bent presented their proposed recommendations and solutions. Ms. Bent said improvements that could be accomplished within five years include pedestrian crossings; new traffic signal on Vernon Avenue by Jerry’s; restrict left turn movement at Interlachen Boulevard and Vernon Avenue; remove the free right turn at the top of the W. 50th/Vernon Avenue ramp, from southbound TH-100 ramp so that traffic comes to a complete stop and then makes the right turn; remove redundant ramp to northbound TH-100; add bike lanes on Arcadia Avenue; and add a new connection from Eden Avenue to Jerry’s. With implementations of the short term solutions and Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue beginning to take shape, Ms. Bent said mid-term (5-15 years) improvements could be making Vernon Avenue a 3-lane road including a dedicated turning lane with sidewalks and bike lanes; a multi-use path on Eden Avenue; open W. 53rd Street to add another entrance into the neighborhood; eliminate one of the southbound TH-100 exit ramps; and connecting Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue to create a transit connection. Ms. Bent said long-term (15-30 years) solutions could be a shared street at Arcadia Avenue to north of the old public works site which would extend to the new pedestrians bridge over TH-100; using Willson Road as a new exit ramp from TH-100 was eliminated because of feedback; adding a new road to Jerry’s parking ramp which will serve as another entrance to the ramp. Ms. Bent said they evaluated current Level of Service (LOS) at intersections and compared them to with a future time with developments. She said there was slight degradation in LOS in the short-term, especially at Interlachen Boulevard which is one reason they are recommending having another entrance into the neighborhood. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 6/16/2016 2 Ms. Bent said the final study will be presented in June/July 2016. Discussion Member Olson asked if light rail was considered and Ms. Bent said this would be looked at as density increased (the “long term”) and this would also be the time to consider the Lid. Member Brown asked about density and transparency and Ms. Bent said the final report will cover density in detail. Member Janovy asked what should be included in the Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) and Ms. Bent said the short term improvements. Planner Nolan said staff is already working on the CIP and have included the short term improvements. VI. Community Comment Mr. David Davison, 6716 Galway Drive, addressed the ETC in response to an article in the Edina Sun Current regarding the Dan Patch rail line whether the City Council should support further study, dedicate staff time or request the gag rule be overturned. Mr. Davison said the City Council should consider light rail and not support overturning the gag rule on the Dan Patch rail line because in doing so the City Council would be agreeing to a plan for heavy, fast trains (commuter rail), the subject of the gag rule, contrary to the best interests of Edina. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2016 Work Plan Updates B. Community Circulator Study (Brown and Loeffelholz) Member Brown presented the following options: i. Create their bus system ii. Utilize SW Transit a. Create Southdale Circulator b. Use Southwest Prime (similar to Uber) iii. Pool resources from major apartments, condos and senior buildings. iv. Metro Transit extension Discussion Member Olson asked what happened to the B-Line that used to run in Edina/Richfield/Bloomington? He said the map outlined by member Loeffelholz looks a like the B-Line route. Chair LaForce asked if there was a need for this service and what was the City Council’s vision of the circulator? Planner Nolan said it is left over from the transportation options working group that was working on transportation for the elderly and disabled, and member Iyer added there is a need for youth transportation services after school. Member Janovy suggested looking at Southwest Prime as an option. Members Brown and Loeffelholz will pursue this option. C. Edina To Go App Transportation Recommendations (Iyer) Member Iyer said he will present his recommendations next month and requested of staff to invite Mr. Gilgenbach to the next ETC meeting. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 6/16/2016 3 D. 2015 Street Smarts Campaign Evaluation (Janovy) Member Janovy said she sent some questions to planner Nolan and he met with Mr. Gilgenbach. She said she is not sure that this is the best use of their time. She said if the communications department is interested in input, they should be willing to work directly with the ETC but they are always told to work thru staff (planner Nolan). Discussion Chair LaForce said he has no way of telling if what they did worked or not. Member Iyer suggested a single message for the summer instead of many phrases. Planner Nolan was asked where communications get their guidance and he said staff the police and engineering department review their work. Planner Nolan was asked who was determining goals and he said last year the ETC had ideas regarding a campaign while the police and communications had their own and all three joined together. Chair LaForce said the communications department have already started their campaign and is moving forward with it. Member Janovy said they’ve offered feedback and nothing has changed so it is not worth their time. E. Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2016 A.1. Member Janovy said she was concerned with installing a sign in such a narrow boulevard. She suggested using a stop bar but planner Nolan said stop bars are inconclusive at this time as they are still being studied. D.1. Member Janovy said better communication is needed with the public. Planner Nolan said a staff is dedicated to Centerpoint Energy and the City does press releases. Member Iyer said Street Closures could be added to Edina To Go. Planner Nolan said staff is working on mapping Street Closures. Member Janovy suggested communications department doing a press release that lists how to sign up for Street Closure information and where to find information on the City’s website. Motion was made by member Boettge and seconded by member Miranda to forward the May 4, 2016, Traffic Safety Report to City Council. Boettge, Brown, Iyer, LaForce, Miranda, and Olson voted aye. Janovy voted nay. Motion carried. F. 2015 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Summary Report Member Olson asked if there was any concern that the PACS fund could be depleted given the approval of the two sidewalks that were petitioned. Yes, said planner Nolan. Member Janovy suggested an article in About Town about the two sidewalks. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions - None IX. Chair and Member Comments Member Ruehl said she agreed with adding Street Closures to Edina To Go App because she researched street closures on the City’s website and could not find anything. Member Janovy asked if the ETC will see the CIP and planner Nolan said yes. She asked if the ETC would get a chance to give feedback on the Grandview District Transportation Study and planner Nolan said yes. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 6/16/2016 4 Member Brown said a resident mentioned to him that shrubs on Eden Avenue near Our Lady of Grace were obstructing view. He asked if pedestrian connection between city hall and Perkins Restaurant was part of the Grandview District Transportation Study and planner Nolan said yes. He said he is concerned with density in the Grandview area. Member Iyer said he’s heard from residents about speeding on Normandale Road and that they may bring their concerns to the ETC or City Council. He said W. 77th Street at Minnesota Drive should go straight thru to France Avenue and planner Nolan said the Comprehensive Plan is scheduled to be updated soon so this could be suggested for inclusion. Member Miranda suggested naming the new street in the Grandview area Yancy. He said he attended the curbside chat by StrongTowns.org that member Bass suggested. Member Olson said it was National Walk and Bike to School Day recently and it must have been heavily promoted because he could not find a space to park his bike at his child’s school. Chair LaForce noted the difference between the transportation study presentation last month (Southdale Study) and the Grandview Study tonight. He said he is much happier with tonight’s transportation study presentation. Chair LaForce said the City Council has asked the ETC to study passenger light rail. He said the ETC is not taking a position, just studying it and manager Neal was going to City Council for their timeline. Chair LaForce said member Brown summarized information on the Dan Patch rail line that was emailed everyone and their task is to answer the three questions they received from the City Council. Planner Nolan will email the three questions to everyone. X. Staff Comments • A joint work session with City Council is scheduled for Jun. 21, 6:30 p.m. The ETC was asked to send ideas for discussion at the work session to Chair LaForce and planner Nolan. • A petition was received for a sidewalk on Woodland Road W. (Golf Terrace B) and it was approved by Council. • For 2016, all the money budgeted for the PACS fund will likely be spent. • The 2016 projects are progressing on schedule. • Bid opening for several sidewalk projects are scheduled for May 26. Xerxes Avenue sidewalk is still in design and bid opening is scheduled for Jun. 9. • Capital Improvement Planning started and is due to Finance by the end of June and due to City Council by Sept. for adoption in Nov. or Dec. • They are four Centerpoint Energy crews working throughout the city. XI. Calendar of Events A. Schedule of Meeting and Events as of May 19, 2016 XII. Adjournment at 8:25 p.m. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 6/16/2016 5 J F M A M J J A S O N D SM WS # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 5 NAME TERM (Date) 6/21 Bass, Katherine 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 80% Boettge, Emily 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 4 80% Brown, Andy 3/1/2019 1 1 1 3 100% Iyer, Surya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Loeffelholz, Ralf 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 4 80% Janovy, Jennifer 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Miranda, Lou 3/1/2019 1 1 1 3 100% Olson, Larry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Ding, Emily (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 2 40% Ruehl, Lindsey (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 1 3 60% TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.8. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Park Board, May 10, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Park Board, May 10, 2016 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 7/12/2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Park Board Edina City Hall, Council Chambers May 10, 2016 I. Call To Order Chair McCormick called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair McCormick, Members Miller, Nelson, Good, Meyer, Dahlien and Student Members Lohani and Crist. Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Support Specialist Janet Canton, Art Center General Manager Michael Frey and Braemar Golf Course General Manager Joe Abood III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Good to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Miller to approve the April 12, 2016 minutes. Motion seconded by Dahlien. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. City Council Work Session & Work Plan Update Chair McCormick reminded the Park Board that the work session with the City Council will be held on Tuesday, June 7 at 5:30 p.m. to go through the Park Board’s work plan. She added that attendance is required at the work session. Chair McCormick asked for one key coordinator for each item on the work plan. She explained the coordinator will work with the staff liaison to make sure that the meetings and minutes are recorded properly. She asked the Park Board to determine what key items they would like to get the City Council’s input on. The following was determined: Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 7/12/2016 #1 Inclusive Playground at Rosland Park – Member Nelson will be the coordinator #2 Fred Richards Master Plan - Member Good will be the coordinator #3 Park Signage Replacement – Member Miller will be the coordinator #4 Grandview Facility Planning – Member Nelson will be the coordinator #5 Cost Recovery – Student Member Lohani will be the coordinator #6 Marketing and Communication – Chair McCormick will be the coordinator #7 Engaging External Resources – Member Strother/Member Gieseke will be the coordinators #8 Pollinator Garden – Chair McCormick will be the coordinator #9 Multi-year Playground Renovation Plan – Member Dahlien will be the coordinator #10 Water Bottle Sales – Park Board Members Chair McCormick noted there may be a couple of other items the City Council may want to discuss such as the winter programming at Braemar Golf Course and the Weber Woods. It was determined the Park Board will start with the larger initiatives: Grandview, Fred Richards Master Plan and the Park Signage and then will go in order of the other items. B. Grandview Facility Feasibility & Operational Analysis Final Report Staff Liaison Kattreh recognized and thanked the members of the task force and consulting team for all their work. She then gave a brief history of what has happened to date with the Grandview Facility study. Victor Pechaty from HGA gave a power point presentation on the final draft that represents the conclusion of the feasibility study for the potential community center public facility on the Grandview site. Jeff Bransford from Pros Consulting indicated he has been working with HGA and Sutton & Associates to develop the operating and maintenance cost estimates for the facility that Mr. Pechaty described. He then went through the feasibility study. Staff Liaison Kattreh asked each Park Board member to provide specific review and comment so that it can be added to the City Council’s packet for their May 17 City County meeting. Each Park Board member present gave their feedback with regard to the Grandview site. C. Braemar Golf Course Final Master Plan Staff Liaison Kattreh gave a history of the Braemar Golf Course project when the process for it first started in July of 2013. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 7/12/2016 Joe Abood, Braemar Golf Course General Manager, gave a power point presentation on the final master plan for the renovation of the regulation course. Staff Liaison Kattreh informed the Park Board that at the May 17 City Council meeting they will be asking City Council for their approval to put the golf course renovation out for bid. The Park Board asked questions and had a discussion. Student Member Crist left at 8:58 p.m. VII. Correspondence And Petitions None VIII. Chair And Member Comments Chair McCormick again reminded the Park Board members there is a work session with the City Council on Tuesday, June 7 at 5:30 p.m. She noted that it is a mandatory meeting for attendance. IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh gave the following updates: • There was a very successful groundbreaking today for the pickleball courts at Rosland Park; those courts will be completed in July. • The Robertson Cup event will be held at Braemar Arena this weekend. • There is exterior remodeling going on at the Braemar Golf Course clubhouse; work is being done on the roof, siding and patio. • The outdoor croquet lawn games and paddleboats are now open at Centennial Lakes Park. • On Thursday, May 12 the Art Center has an Art for the Garden Gallery Show; the event is from 5 to 8 p.m. and the show will run through June 16. • On May 16 there will be a dedication to the Don Nyrop Northwest Airlines Commemorative sculptures at Centennial Lakes Park. X. Adjournment Motion made by McCormick to adjourn the May 10, 2016 meeting at 9:10 p.m. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.9. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Heritage Preservation Board, June 14, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: Attached are the approved minutes from the June 14, 2016 Heritage Preservation Board meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Heritage Preservation Board Minutes, June 14, 2016 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 7/12/2016 1 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall Community Room June 14, 2016, 7:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Birdman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chairman Birdman, Vice Chair Weber, and Members Moore, Sussman, Christiaansen, McLellan, Pearson, Kelly, Nymo, and Student Members Puerzer and Otness. Staff Liaison, Senior Planner Repya, and Preservation Consultant, Robert Vogel were also in attendance. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by McLellan and seconded by Moore to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Moore and seconded by Kelly to approve the minutes from the May 10, 2016 meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: None VI. Reports/Recommendations: A. Certificate of Appropriateness: 4601 Bruce Avenue - New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) request entails the removal of an existing 1953, 484 sq. ft., 2-car garage to be replaced with a new garage of the same size in the same location, with access from an existing driveway off of Bridge Street. Details of the proposed garage include scale and massing consistent with its surroundings and garages previously approved through the COA process. While the home, classified as Tudor, is clad in stucco, the exterior materials proposed for the garage a six inch James Hardi lap siding with aluminum soffit and fascia boards. Ms. Repya concluded that Preservation Consultant evaluated the proposed garage and determined that the plans depict a structure that reflects the 20th century vernacular aesthetic represented by most of Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 7/12/2016 2 the garages built in the district during its period of historical significance (1924-1944); it may not represent high-style architecture, but it doesn’t detract from the historic significance and integrity of the neighborhood. Therefore, approval of the proposed detached garage was recommended subject to the plans presented and a year built be installed on the exterior of the new structure. Applicants Present - Homeowners, Fritz and Carol Arnason Mr. Arnason, addressing the board explained that it is their intent to build a garage that will enhance their property and the neighborhood. Attention to detail has been addressed with a carriage overhead door, lantern sconce lighting and a window box for flowers. Motion was made by Moore and seconded by Sussman to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the proposed detached garage, subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque be installed on the exterior of the structure. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Certificate of Appropriateness: 4905 Arden Avenue - New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) request includes the demolition of a 2-car, 440 sq. ft., detached garage that was constructed in 1986; and replacing it with the proposed 484 sq. ft. structure built in approximately the same location, and accessed by the existing driveway on the north side of the property. Ms. Repya pointed out that the proposed plans provide for a structure that compliments the architectural style of the home; with a heights to peak of 18’, to the mid-point of the gable of 13.5’ and to the eave line of 8’. The plans also call for stucco cladding with limestone accents on either side of the overhead door to compliment the home, and the north side elevation includes a service door and double six-over-six paned windows. Also, a 9/12 roof pitch is proposed, and asphalt shingles are proposed to match the roof of the house. Ms. Repya concluded that the COA application describes a building that is consistent with the design review guidelines presented in the district plan of treatment. The proposed new construction will match the character of the historic house; furthermore, it is compatible with the existing house in size, scale, massing, and material and will also be visually compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. Thus, approval of the COA was recommended subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque be installed on the exterior of the structure. Applicant Present - Homeowner, John Schultz Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 7/12/2016 3 Motion was made by Sussman and seconded by Christiaansen to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new detached garage, subject to the plans presented and a year built plaque be installed on the exterior of the structure. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. HPB Work Plans: 2016 & Proposed 2017 Board members evaluated the status of the 2016 work plan initiatives to determine those which have been accomplished, those that will be accomplished by year end, and those that should be continued on the proposed 2017 work plan. Planner Repya advised the board that since the annual summer tour will occupy the July meeting; the planning for the 2017 work plan will take place during the August and September meetings to ensure that the proposed 2017 plan is submitted to the City Council for their consideration by September 23rd. She thanked the board for providing their input on the work plans, and challenged them to consider initiatives that they would like to consider including for the 2017 work plan. No formal action was taken. VII. Correspondence And Petitions: A. Edina Heritage Preservation in the News 1. Wooddale Bridge Heritage Landmark Designation - June 5, 2016 Sun Current 2. Edina Heritage Award Program - June 2016 - Edina Magazine VIII. Chair And Member Comments: • Chair Birdman announced that in several weeks Member Weber will be moving out of Edina, thus will no longer be able to serve on the HPB. Birdman shared his appreciation for Weber’s commitment to the HPB - taking a leadership role as both Chair and Vice Chair; as well as publishing a 4-part educational piece on the Advisory Blog explaining the extent of demolition allowed in the Country Club District. The entire board shared Birdman’s comments and wished Member Weber the very best. • Member Weber stated that he hated to leave the HPB, noting that he enjoyed his time of service, and expressed an interest in joining the board on the annual summer tours. IX. Staff Comments: • Next Meeting: July 12th - Annual Summer Tour: Country Club District (west side) created by Student Member Peter Otness • Offered thanks and best wishes to outgoing Member Weber. X. Adjournment: 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce Repya Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 7/12/2016 4 Date: July 19, 2016 Agenda Item #: XIII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Meetings and Events as of July 19, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None required INTRODUCTION: Information only. ATTACHMENTS: Description Schedule of Meetings and Events as of July 19, 2016 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF JULY 19, 2016 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues July 19 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 19 Joint Meeting – Human Rights & Relations Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 2 NITE TO UNITE Tues Aug 2 First Day to File Affidavit of Candidacy 8 A.M.-4:30 P.M. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE Wed Aug 3 Business Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Aug 3 Capital Improvement Plan 2017-2021 & 2017 Budget 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Aug 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 9 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY – POLLS OPEN 7 A.M. UNTIL 8 P.M. Tues Aug 16 Last Day to File Affidavit of Candidacy 8 A.M. 0 5 P.M. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE Tues Aug 16 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 16 Joint Work Session Community Health Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Sep 5 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed Sep 7 Work Session – 2017 – 2021 CIP & 2017 Budget 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Sep 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sep 20 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 20 Joint Work Session Heritage Preservation Board 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sep 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 5 Boards & Commission Annual Work Plan Meeting 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 18 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 18 Business Meeting 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS