Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 09-14 Planning Commission Meeting Packets • Agenda Planning Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Wednesday, September 14, 2016 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Edina Planning Commission, August 24, 2016 V. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing: Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan and Variances at 4500 Valley View Road for Pete Rifakes VI. Community Comment During"Community Comment,"the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead,the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Staff Report: Floodplain District Overlay Ordinance Updates B. Sketch Plan Reivew- 5109-5125 West 49th Street C. Sketch Plan Review -7200 France D. 2017 Work Plan VIII. Correspondence And Petitions IX. Chair And Member Comments X. Staff Comments Xl. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification,an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a dare. -�N \ ';� Minutes 1``--- -ii City Of Edina, Minnesota .,„„ ,, y,tGI to Planning Commission tis ,,,, Edina City Hall Council Chambers f \`; 4801 50th Street West, Edina, MN Wednesday, August 24, 2016 I. Call To Order Chair Platteter called the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission to order at 7:00 P.M. II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Commissioners Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Olsen, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Chair Platteter. Communications Coordinator, Gilenbach, Administrative Specialist, Hoogenakker III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the August 24, 2016, meeting agenda. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the July 27, 2016, meeting minutes. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Olsen. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Public Hearing A. Variance. 6511 Ridgeview Drive, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the applicant is requesting a 5.35 foot front yard setback variance to add a front entry and powder room addition to the subject home located at the end of Ridgeview Circle cul-de-sac.The project includes an addition to the powder room/bathroom area next to a proposed enlarged front entry extension.A porch less than 80 square feet into the front yard setback, (complies), is also part of the plan. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variance based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: [1] Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes Approved Date:as hcYt e to enter a r,.tce. a) The practical difficult is caused by the location of the homes to the north and south, (already farther back from the front lot lines than the subject home). b) The encroachment into the setback will not affect neighboring properties or the street scape. The improvement is a minimal point intrusion into the setback. c) The request is reasonable given the location of the existing home and the desire to add to a small entry. The addition will break up the massing of front facade of the home. Teague said approval is also subject to the following condition: I. The home must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped July 18, 2016. Appearing for the Applicant Byron and Laura Olson Public Testimony Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion and Comments Commissioners expressed the opinion that the variance was minimal and made sense. Commissioners asked if staff had further concerns. Planner Teague responded staff has no concerns it's a very straightforward request. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the variance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Nemerov. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Variance. 5812 Hidden Lane, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the subject property is a corner lot located in the north east corner of Dundee Road and Hidden Lane. The proposal is to tear-down the existing home and replace it with a new home within the existing setbacks along Hidden Lane and Dundee Road that are provided by the current home. The existing home has a 37.83 foot setback from Dundee Road and 72.5 foot setback from Hidden Lane. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variances based on the following findings: [2] Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Chck here to enter a date. 1. The proposed location of the house is reasonable. It will be located the same distance to the street as the existing home. 2. The one story home is appropriate in size and scale and is well within all other ordinance requirements. 3. A practical difficulty in this instance is the deeper front yard setback of the rebuilt home to the north. 4. The proposed home will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed new home and requested front yard location will complement the existing neighborhood homes and maintain a setback that has historically been on site since the original home was constructed. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: • Plans and survey dated stamped:July 25, 2016. • Engineering memo dated: August 8, 2016; and • Watershed District Permit Appearing for the Applicant Jon and Heidi Hempel, property owners and Nate Wissick, Elevation Planner Teague noted that the applicant submitted signatures of support from neighbors. Discussion and Comments Planner Teague was asked if any trees removed would be replaced. Planner Teague responded that code requires tree replacement if a tree(s) is removed outside the 10-foot replacement line. Teague said it appears no trees are impacted; however, the applicant has submitted a landscaping plan. Commissioners complimented the applicant on the quality of the plans, graphic comparisons and their outreach to the neighbors. Applicant Presentation Mr. Wissick with the aid of graphics pointed out that the new house conforms more to the neighborhood than it is different. Wissick said the subject house was built in the 1950's, adding building new worked best for the applicant. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing acknowledging the petition of neighborhood support submitted by the applicants. [31 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes Li Approved Date:Click I a a co enter a(1,ta. Jim Jorgenson, 5821 Northwood Drive, Edina, MN indicated his support for the project noting that the placement of the new house conforms to the "curve" of the road. Chair Platteter asked if anyone else would like to speak to the project; being none Commissioner Olsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Olsen to approve the variance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Thorsen. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Public Comment Chair Platteter opened the public comment period. No one spoke. A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close public comment. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The Motion carried. VII. Reports and Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review. 6600 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported the Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop the 22 acre parcel at 6600 France. The request includes consideration of a multiple (5) phase development. As proposed, at full built out, the site would include a new 6- story medical building, a new 6-story hotel, a new 8-story residential apartment, two new 2- story retail buildings, and the new single story Bank of America. Existing buildings that would remain include the 7-story office, the 6-story office and the Tavern on France. The only building that would be removed from the site is the office building that connects to 7 and 6 story office buildings. Planner Teague added to accommodate the request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the height maximum from four stories to eight stories is required and a Rezoning from POD-2 to PUD, Planned Unit Development Planner Teague explained the Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant; they have incorporated many of the core principles into the proposed plans. They have divided the large parcels into smaller blocks providing pedestrian and transit separations [4] Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:tack here to enter a date, and connections. Sidewalks are proposed completely around and through the site; they are providing the 50-foot setback on France Avenue with green space and sidewalks; have created storefronts on France with the new retail buildings; and have tied into the pedestrian and car connections to Southdale as shown in the Southdale Vision Plan. Concluding, Planner Teague said the PUD rezoning is required to allow the proposed housing on the site and the increase in floor area ratio (FAR). Housing is not allowed under the current zoning, but would be allowed under the existing OR, Office Residential Comprehensive Plan designation for the site. Appearing for the Applicant Bob Erickson, Wildamere and Dean Dovolis, DJR Architecture Inc. Comments and Questions Commissioners expressed the following: • Commissioners questioned how/why the Comprehensive Plan limited building height to 4-stories on the west side of France Avenue. Planner Teague explained the City Council modified portions of the Comp Plan to reduce building height on the west side of France to 4-stories. Teague said he believed at that time the Council felt that a 4-story building height limit would buffer the residential properties to the west. Chair Platteter said the Planning Commission's recommendation was different from the Council's. It was further noted by Commissioners that a natural buffer does exist along areas west of France to include berms and significant green space. • Commissioners asked Planner Teague if the PUD rezoning was for the entire parcel. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Teague further explained that a PUD rezoning is site specific and an Ordinance is created for the approved plan. Teague stressed that what is approved is what must be built unless an amendment to the plan is requested. He also noted that the PUD rezoning would allow housing on the site and an increase in floor area ration (FAR). Teague further reported the PUD rezoning would also ensure compliance with the Southdale Development Principles and that affordable housing would be a component (as suggested in Phase 5). • Planner Teague was asked if an increase in density could be addressed in other ways besides the PUD rezoning. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. • Commissioners asked Planner Teague if the project would be developed along the block structure as mentioned. Teague responded it would be similar; however, they will need to work around the buildings that will remain. Applicant Presentation Bob Erickson addressed the Commission and reported that he along with the development team met with City staff to discuss the applicants' plans for the site. Erickson said a neighborhood meeting was held that [51 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: CI ck inert: ccs Lwer< d rt>> was attended by 43 residents. Erickson introduced the development team to include representatives from DJR Architecture, DF/Damon Farber, BKBM Engineers and Spack Traffic. Concluding, Erickson said this project is a labor of love and asked the Commission for their feedback. Dean Dovolis addressed the Commission and with graphics pointed out highlights of the project. Dovolis reported that the proposed Promenade on France is a phased project that is expected to begin within the next 5 to 10 years and is a blend of new and existing structures. He explained with regard to building height that the proposed building height will not exceed the height of the existing structures. Dovolis said that this proposal creates a promenade on France and the intent is to collar the site with landscaping. Dovolis expressed the following: • The project will maintain and enhance the site by combining new elements with existing elements. The creation of boulevards will organize and breakdown the scale of the site and strengthen connections to adjacent properties. • The project will be developed in Phases. Phase I would include the retail element and further enhancements of the France Avenue streetscape. The advantage of phasing the project is to create as little disruption to the site and protect parking during construction. • A central pedestrian spine running N/S through the site and 2 spines running E/W would be developed. These pedestrian spines would distribute foot traffic throughout the site. The site will also provide enhanced eye view and above views for residents at a higher elevation. • The site has low points that would be incorporated into a water management plan through ponding and other measures. Dovolis further stressed the importance of maintaining greenspace throughout the site. He asked the Commission to note that the large grove of existing Oaks would be preserved for not only those who work and live on the site but for all residents. • The proposed master plan envisions a medical office building, two retail buildings, a hotel or office building that would replace the existing office buildings and new construction of underground parking. Concluding Dovolis said he is seeking feedback from the Commission on the proposed rezoning from POD-2 to PUD and an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for building height. Dovolis said a traffic study is proposed and watershed district permits would be applied for at the time of formal application. Dovolis said sustainable design is also an important element of the project. Discussion and Comments • Commissioners acknowledged the reduction in surface parking; however, expressed the opinion that further reduction in surface parking could be a goal. Dovolis responded that he appreciates that flexibility however, it is important for the existing and remaining building tenants to keep the existing convenience parking. He did stress that surface parking would be scaled down as phasing occurs; however, surface parking is needed to maintain adequate expected suburban parking. He noted the difficulty in redeveloping suburban sites because of their high emphasis on vehicle traffic. Dovolis said the site is "stuck" in transition. [6] • Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date, • Commissioners asked the applicant what the size was of the proposed easement area that protects the large Oak grove. Dovolis responded he is unsure of the exact size; however, it is identified as a conservation easement. This easement area would preserve the Oaks to include restoration. • Dovolis was asked if they have comparable retail components. Dovolis pointed out that two new retail buildings (one existing and one proposed) have/will be constructed on the west side of France south of the subject site., adding the new retail buildings would be comparable. Dovolis reported there are tenants already "out there" that have expressed their willingness to move into these new buildings. • Commissioners asked Mr. Dovolis the number of residential units proposed. Mr. Dovolis said the development team envisions this building to contain 70 units; a type of boutique project. • Commissioners asked if the site was still considered an office park. Dovolis responded in the affirmative, adding that it's an office park and more. He noted that France Avenue is becoming a "medical alley" that's spreading south. He added the proposed 70-unit residential building would complement the site; not compete with the existing and planned residential units in the Greater Southdale area. Dovolis pointed out within this area roughly I,100 units are already on line or soon to be, adding their residential building is designed to be something different, reiterating they want to complement the residential redevelop in the area not compete. • Commissioners' questioned if the proposed renovations and construction of additional buildings would be considered Class A with amenities. Dovolis responded the buildings would be Class A. • Commissioners expressed concern with parking and traffic during the construction phases. Mr. Dovolis responded that because of the size of the site and with construction in phases traffic and construction parking should not be an issue. Dovolis said he also foresees staging on the site, adding traffic would also be addressed and mitigated. It was pointed out by the Chair that the presently the City is undergoing a lot of street closings and the resulted traffic congestions; however, the projects that are occurring throughout the City aren't City or development projects but infrastructure projects by Center Point energy. Dovolis further explained that during construction all City construction management requirements will be respected. • Commissioners expressed the opinion that surface parking for the proposed redevelopment could be reduced. It was pointed out that the goal of the City is to reduce surface parking and have buildings address the street. Dovolis responded that he agrees that more greenspace is important; however, parking is important to the existing uses. Dovolis reiterated suburban inner ring cities are in a transition phase, adding parking can be reduced; however, at this time not eliminated. He said it is very hard to forecast I5 years out. He reiterated the phasing of this project allows for reactions to the market. He noted the process can continue with flexibility because of the phasing. Dovolis also asked the Commission to note the difficulty of France Avenue being a county road. He said the vision of the County is very different from the vision of the City. He pointed out the County envisions France Avenue as an extension of Highway 100, which is why City staff, the City Council and Planning Commission need to reach out of the County to share this vision. He noted along France Avenue the County would rather see fewer curb cuts; reiterating the County looks at capacity. [7] • Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: ;.<.�.he ,o s:.<t<,_. • It was suggested that the developer look into adding an additional east/west pedestrian spine; more to the middle of the site. Dovolis responded that again the County wants fewer curb cuts, etc. • It was also suggested that the applicant look at introducing more variety in building height. Dovolis said he could look into an increase in building heights; however, pointed out the Code dictates density. • Commissioners also expressed the opinion that they want variety in building styles. • It was further suggested that the applicant create an uncomplicated internal circulation pattern for not only pedestrians but for vehicles as well. Commissioners asked the applicants to be generous with landscaping and "mix it up a bit". • It was also suggested that the development team take another look at the Oak grove and have the new buildings take advantage of this amenity. It was noted that it appears the Oak grove is surrounded by parking; not by buildings where occupants could enjoy the natural greenery. • The Commission also suggested that water features be added to the site as a means of storm water management. Use the water as an amenity. • Encourage development of the site to engage all the new residents of the area. Create a site that people will enjoy walking too. Redevelop the site to drawn people in. Take advantage of the existing promenade and help "move" these new residents to the site. Mr. Dovolis said he agrees with all the suggestions and comments. He noted that much also depends on what Simon does with the Southdale Center site directly to the east of the subject site and the input from the County in creating connectivity. • Commissioners stressed the importance of this site; again suggesting implementing water features to aid with storm water management and the use of the Oak grove as an important shared amenity that should be enjoyed by patrons of the site and future residents. • Balance the amenities and unite the site to the residential neighborhood to the west. Consider adding a rugged natural path to the Oak grove. Create a site that people want to go to, that draws people in • Create a WOW environment; that could include an increase in density, increased building height, reduction in surface parking and rich in greenspace and connectivity. Mr. Erickson addressed the Commission and stated the buildings renovated and proposed will be Class A. He invited Commissioners to visit the 6800 building and look at the vision. Mr. Erickson thanked the Commission for their time. B. Comprehensive Plan Update Planner Teague reported the updating of the Comprehensive Plan process is in the works. Teague said staff intends to give each Commissioner a three-ring binder to help keep track of the updating process. The binder will be the "place" where all updates to the plan can be stored throughout the entire process. Teague said the binders would be available for pickup at the Planning Commission meeting on September 14th. Teague further suggested that Commissioners familiarize themselves with the present Comp Plan. [8] Draft Minutes® • Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:flick here to enter a date. Commissioner Strauss also pointed out that the Met Council website is full of information, seminars, and workshops that can be attended by anyone interested. He said in his opinion the Met Council site will also be a good source throughout the process. He added it may be a good idea to pursue a workshop hosted by the Met Council. Commissioner Lee said she agrees with the comments from Commissioner Strauss, adding the Commission should take advantage of Met Councils outreach. A typo was noted on page 3 of staffs memo. 2016 should be 2018. Planner Teague said staff looks forward to beginning the process. IX. Chair and Member Comments Commissioner Hamilton acknowledged he was a new member of the Planning Commission; however, had difficulty during the sketch plan review for 6600 France knowing if the applicant was listening to our suggestions and advice. He said the Commission may need to reinforce that our comments and suggestions were not presented lightly. Planner Teague responded that staff does stress the Commissions input, adding for the most part those suggestions are implemented in the plans before they proceed to the City Council. X. Staff Comments Commissioner Lee asked Planner Teague what the Council outcome was of the proposal for an apartment complex on Lincoln Drive by Opus. Planner Teague responded that Opus did revise their plans according to suggestions from the Commission, adding their request was approved on a 3-1 vote with one abstention. Planner Teague further reported that the applicant has offered to pay an affordable housing fee of two million dollars. Teague further reported that the proposal for redevelopment at 45th and France was also approved. XI. Adjournment A motion was made by Commissioner Bennet to adjourn the public hearing at 10:00 PM. A second was offered by Commissioner Thorsen. All voted aye. The meet was adjourned. Jackie Jtaffgenatifiex Respectfully Submitted [9] 'Cf"(12 44 ' �o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT IBBe Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 14, 2016 V.A. Director of Planning INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Project Description Pete Rifakes, Town Hall Brewery, is proposing to remodel and expand the existing gas station building at 4500 Valley View Road into a restaurant. (See property location on pages A1—A4.) The remodeling would include a 1,300 square foot addition for a cooler and office/storage area, and a 1,000 square foot patio. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A7-A27.) The restaurant would be designed for 64 indoor dining seats and 11 seats at the bar. The outdoor patio area would have 66 seats. The plan is generally consistent with a sketch plan that was reviewed for redevelopment of the site back in 2014-15. At that time the plan was generally well received. (See previously considered plans and the Planning Commission and City Council minutes on pages A66-A73.) To accommodate the request the applicant is requesting the following: ➢ A rezoning of the site from PCD-4 to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District; and ➢ Site Plan Review with building, signage, and parking space variances. The PCD-4 zoning is reflective of Wally's Gas Station that was in operation for many years. Based on feedback from the Planning Commission and City Council, the applicant has made the following revisions to the plans: ➢ Eliminated parking in the front. ➢ Expanded the public space on the corner. ➢ Added landscaping and green space. ➢ Enhanced the architecture of the building. ➢ Added sidewalks. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single family homes; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District, and guided LDR, Low Density Residential. Easterly: Retail/office building guided NN, Neighborhood Node and zoned PCD- 1, Planned Commercial District — 1. Southerly: Apartment building; guided NN, Neighborhood Node and zoned PRD-4, Planned Residential District —4. Westerly: Single family homes & duplex; zoned and guided Low Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 2 acres in size, contains the abandoned Wally's Gas Station building and a 15,000 square foot retail center. (See pages A2 an A6.) Planning Guide Plan designation: NN, Neighborhood Node. (See pages A4-A5.) Zoning: PCD-1 and PCD-4, Planned Commercial Districts. (See page A3.) Parking Based on the proposal for a site with 15,000 square feet of existing retail, an existing restaurant (Snuffy's) and a proposed 75-seat restaurant; 143 parking stalls would be required. The site plan demonstrates 95 parking stalls available, with room to add 8. Spack Consulting conducted a parking study which concludes that the site would have adequate parking to accommodate the proposed restaurant. (See page A43 of the parking study.) Site Circulation There are currently three full vehicle access points to this site. The applicant is proposing to eliminate all three of them to make the restaurant more pedestrian friendly. This will improve pedestrian and vehicular circulation. As mentioned, a boulevard style sidewalk is proposed on both streets providing direct pedestrian connections to the restaurant. (See pages A23-A24.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 10 over-story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing 14 over story trees and a full complement of understory shrubs around the entire site. 2 There is no landscaping on this site now. The proposed landscaping would be a vast improvement over what exists on the site today. (See page A23-A24.) Mechanical Equipment The proposed building elevations show screening of the mechanical equipment on the roof. (See page Al 4 & A17.) Per Section 36-1459 of the City Code: "All mechanical equipment screening shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building." Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached pages A40-A41. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Watershed District. Building/Building Material The existing building would be refurbished and re-painted. The addition would match the existing building. (See renderings on pages A11-A17.) The applicant will have a materials board for the Planning Commission to review at the Planning Commission meeting. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. 3 (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. There are no sidewalks on the site today. (See page A2.) Boulevard style sidewalks are planned on both Valley View and Wooddale. The sidewalk would be extended to the north lot line, and to the shopping center entrance on the southwest. (See pages A22-A23.) The slopes to west prohibit the sidewalk from continuing further west. Should the larger site redevelop in the future, that sidewalk would be extended. Compliance Table City Standard (PCD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front—Wooddale 35 feet 30 feet*(existing &proposed) Front—Valley View 35 feet 35 feet (canopy) Side— North 20 feet 100+ feet Side—West 20 feet 100+ feet Building Height 2 Stories or 24 feet whichever is One story 20 less feet tall Maximum Floor Area 1.0 of the tract .20 of the tract Ratio (FAR) Tract size =2 acres or 87,120 (18,156 s.f.) s.f. Parking Stalls (Site) 80 required for retail 103 spaces 26 required for Snuffy's existing and 37 required for new restaurant proposed* 143 total required * Variance Required Variances The following Variances are requested: Building ➢ Front setback from 35 to 30 feet. (proposed to match the existing condition) 4 v t Parking Lot ➢ Parking space variance from 143 to 103. Signage ➢ Re-use of an existing pylon sign. ➢ Above a roof-line sign. ➢ Wall sign variance from 15% to 62%. (From 80 square feet to 325 square feet.) Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the variance proposed for the building setback for the addition, the parking space variance, and the variance to allow the use of the existing pylon sign are reasonable. The practical difficulties for these variances are based on existing conditions. The existing building setback and pylon sign currently do not conform to City Code. (See page A20.) The parking lot is an existing condition. Rather than add stalls in front of the restaurant, a shared parking arrangement is proposed. It is reasonable to continue these nonconforming conditions. The Spack Consulting parking study has determined that the site can function with the proposed parking stalls. (See page A43 of the parking study.) The City has typically not required parking stalls when they are not needed. In regard to the wall sign and the above the roof sign, staff does not believe there is a practical difficulty. These are new signs that could easily be revised to meet City Code. The City has not granted variances to allow roof signs or wall signage that exceeds 15%. (See the proposed signs on pages Al2-A14 and A17.) A wall sign would be allowed on that elevation at 80 square feet. The proposed sign is 325 square feet. 5 f T The applicant is proposing the roof and wall signage to be consistent with the "station" concept and to help visibility. (See the applicant narrative on pages A8-A9.) 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes. As mentioned above, the unique circumstances are the location of the existing building, existing pylon sign and parking lot. These conditions were not created by the applicant. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed new building will enhance the character of the neighborhood, as it is a vast improvement to the existing structure. The landscaping and green space in front and in back of the new building will also improve the character of the neighborhood. Greater Southdale Area Development Principles - City Goals While this project is not located in the Southdale Area, as recommended by the City Council, the Greater Southdale Area Development Principles are applied to this development. The applicant is providing a safer pedestrian experience by creating a boulevard style sidewalk Valley View and Wooddale; and eliminating the drive entrances. They have also eliminated the parking in front of the building and added green space. The corner of Valley View and Wooddale would be dedicated public space to engage the neighborhood and create a sense of place. Rezoning Per Section 36-216 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission is asked to consider all Rezoning requests subject to the following: (1) Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided NN, Neighborhood Node. (See portions of the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plan on pages A28-A39.) A restaurant is a permitted use. The following are the development guidelines for NN, Neighborhood Node: "Building footprints generally less than 20,000 square feet (or less for individual storefronts). Parking is less prominent than pedestrian features. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize enhancement of the pedestrian environment." 6 Land Use Category General Description Development Guidelines Density Guidelines NN In general,small-to Building footprints generally less Maximum residential Neighborhood Node moderate-scale than 20,000 square feet(or less for density up to 30 dwelling commercial, individual storefronts). units per acre(du/acre). residential or mixed Parking is less prominent than (Densities are further use buildings serving pedestrian features. constrained by the primarily the adjacent parameters of the neighborhood(s). Encourage structured parking and Building Height Limits open space linkages where feasible; Plan*). Primary uses emphasize enhancement of the encouraged are pedestrian environment. neighborhood serving Encourage development to comply Maximum Floor Area retail and services, with the Wooddale Valley View Ratio(FAR)per zoning offices,studios, Neighborhood Node Development code. institutional and Guidelines*: residential. A. Building Height Limits Plan B. Building Frontage Guidelines C. Gathering Space Guidelines D. Site-Specific Guidelines E. General Guidelines The applicant has done a nice job complying with the development guidelines by eliminating all vehicle entrances to the site and replacing them with sidewalks and green space. The goal is to emphasize and enhance the pedestrian environment. (2) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The proposed project would not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The use is permitted and enhances the surrounding properties. This development could be a catalyst to more redevelopment in the area. (3) Will not result in an overly intensive land use; (4) Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; The proposal is not an overly intensive land use. Spack Consulting concluded that the existing roadways can support the proposal. (See traffic and parking study on pages A42—A65.) (5) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and Other than the variances requested, the project would conform to PCD-1 zoning regulations. While variances are requested, the conditions of the site would be greatly improved. (6) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. 7 l The proposed project does have proper relationships between existing and proposed structures (Existing condition.) Extensive landscaping is proposed on the site, where none exists today. The pedestrian experience on Valley View and Wooddale would be improved, and the tone would be set for future re-development in this area. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues ® Is the proposed rezoning and development plan reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the NN, Neighborhood Node in the Comprehensive Plan, which allows retail/restaurants. Rezoning the site to PCD-1, Limited Commercial is consistent with the adjacent zoning district. (See page A3.) 2. The building is small and in scale but will be prominent on the corner. The re- model of the existing structure and the added landscaping in front of the building with public gathering space on the corner will transform the site. 3. The existing roadways and proposed parking lot would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a parking and traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that no roadway improvements or parking improvements would be necessary as a result of the proposed plan. (See traffic and parking study on pages A42—A65.) 4. While this project is not located in the Southdale Area, the applicant has incorporated some of the principles of the Greater Southdale Area Development Principles to this development. The applicant is striving to meet the goals by providing a safer pedestrian experience by creating a boulevard style sidewalk on Valley View and Wooddale, public gathering space on the corner, and eliminating two of the drive entrances. Parking in front of the building has been eliminated. Are the proposed Variances reasonable? Yes, to reuse the pylon sign, the building setback and parking stall variances. The practical difficulties for these variances are based on existing conditions. The building setback for the existing structure and the pylon sign do not conform to City Code. The parking lot is also an existing condition. It is reasonable to continue the use of the old gas station sign, given the "Town Hall Station" concept. It is also reasonable 8 to use a shared parking arrangement rather than add stalls in front of the restaurant. The Spack Consulting parking study has determined that the site can function with the proposed parking stalls. The City has typically not required parking stalls when they are not needed. No, to the proposed wall sign and the above the roof sign variances. Staff does not believe there is a practical difficulty with these two signs. These are new signs that could easily be revised to meet City Code. The above roof signs could be lowered, and the size of the wall sign reduced. Staff has concern over the size of the proposed wall sign adjacent to residential property, and the precedent that might set. The City has not granted variances to allow roof signs or wall signage that exceeds 15% in the past. A sign would be allowed on that elevation at 80 square feet. The proposed sign is 325 square feet. Staff Recommendation Preliminary Rezoning From PCD-4 to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District & Preliminary Development Plan with Building Setback, Parking Stall and Pylon Sign Variances at 4500 Valley View Road Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-4, Planned Commercial District to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District and Preliminary Development Plan with the requested Building Setback Variance, Parking Stall Variance and Variance to allow the use of the existing Pylon Sign to remodel and expand the existing Wally's gas station structure at 4500 Valley View Road. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed variances are reasonable. The practical difficulties for these variances are based on existing conditions. The existing building setback and pylon sign do not conform to City Code, and the parking lot is an existing condition. Rather than add stalls in front of the restaurant, a shared parking arrangement is proposed. It is reasonable to continue these nonconforming conditions. 3. The Spack Consulting parking study has determined that the site can function with the proposed parking stalls. The City has typically not required parking stalls when they are not needed. 4. The proposal is a vast improvement over existing conditions, which includes pavement that extends to the lot lines. Significant green space and landscaping has been added in front of the building on both Valley View and Wooddale. 9 5. The applicant is dedicating an easement for public gathering space at corner of Valley View and Wooddale. 6. The proposed remodeled building with green space and boulevard style sidewalks will enhance the character of the neighborhood, as it is a vast improvement to the existing structure and existing conditions of the site. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated July 22, 2016, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 16, 2016. 4. Provision of code compliant bike racks (5 minimum) near the building entrances. 5. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent residential property, per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 7. Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum lighting requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting shall be down lit. Wall Sign Variance and Above the Roof Sign Variance at 4500 Valley View Road Recommend that the City Council deny the Variances to allow the signs above the roofline, and the wall sign variance from 15% to 62%. Denial is subject to the following findings: 1. Lack of a practical difficulty. Denial of the variances would not cause a practical difficulty for the applicant. Signage could still be applied to the building. The proposed rooftop signs could be relocated below the roofline. The wall sign could be reduced in size to 15% of the wall face. 10 2. The City has not granted variances to allow retail signs above the roofline, or variances to exceed the 15% wall face provision. 3. Approval of the Variances could set a precedent for similar requests. Deadline for a city decision: November 1, 2016 11 �l V l..�u G TOWN HALL STATION �.,9R401.1 Pm EDINA, MINNESOTA shea CIVIL ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTAL ri ..+• � 0 a a N Q• r w a I— • • o J J ° q N J w = ' Z _ z: Z > O o F' a _..-.. ... __ O o ti < x I . o SITE LOCATION MAP SITE LOCATION v NAieRF SHEET INDEX Pr '.. DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER: MASTER LEGEND: SHEET GUESSER SHEET TITLE A,T DP AR.,SNO.04200 • PROPOSED MAIHOLE STORM C0.0 TITLE SHEET §]] EK.1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL • C0.1 TITLE SHEET MINNEAPOLIS,MN 554E]S EXISTING SPOT GRADE¢¢ALIDII • PROPOSE°CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN SUMMARY PROPOSED P CONTOUR ELEVATION NERVAL C2.0 SITE PLAN SPOT GRADERS..IWTTERiFLOW LINE 1.1 PROPOSED GATE VALVE _ C3.0 GRADING PLAN UNLESS OTHERWISE 001001 b- PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT C4.0 SITE 8 GRADING PLAN ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SOOOSO+u],om SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BACK OF CURE(TOP OF C5.0 DETAILS O PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY SPOT GRADE ELEVAIION TOP OF WALLCIVIL SITE GROUP C501 DETAILS 031 W 35TH STREET * PROPCGED WIGHT L1 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN vTarry SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONBOTTOM OFWAll PROPOSED SEWER L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH SIDE PLAN,NOTES,DETAILS ST LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 _ DRAINAGE ARROW SW10 STORM WATER NLLUTCW PREVENTION PLAN-EOSCNG CONDITIONS 612.015-0060pp°p05ED STORM SEWER 81281eo EO EMERGENCY OVERFLOW -+- PROPOSEOWATER MAINSW1.1 S7 CONDITIONS SUMMARY SURVEYOR: SILT BENCE'GRADING LIMIT EXISTINGSANITARY SW1.3 VaiERPVLLur:ON PREVENTION NARRATIVE ^*S RExAIA.,oN s 1 ARTSEWER ORM NATI.PClILRION PREVENTION PLAN D£TSLS HARRY S.JOHNSON CO., SW1.3 STORM PLAN�N --- E%IGTInG SToum SEWER WLETPROiECTION SOUTH9056 LYNDALE AVENUE ... EXISTING WATER 05.2.886.63415x5519] !mum l!! STAEDMED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE x1 +N MAIN GOPHER STATE ONE CALL G GAS • - EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC w''raamFnsrA]FaxErw+CORR IL BORING LOCATION TIG urvOERGROUNO CABLEt. EWTOSSSI000LOATA GE97ECHNICAL ENGINEER; • TITLE SHEET NIA CURB OM CUTTER(T06 MOUT) , EXISTING MANHOLE 6iBox TI TEXISTINGCATCH BASIN ,} NG ELECTRIC TING L/GHT 4.6 EXISTING 6 EXISTING RANT EXISTING R EwsNGA C0.0 B. EXISTING GATE LVE ii, ,0 t* ...7;to .e. ..,*7,.. . ' '.. "..":-.., / fah t rI w `''may kE p 3 i ,. . : sj .1:.' '''' ' iiifi 1 ',,A›‘ .1,i,;;• 1 ,, ej ., ttl.' - iti: '' '''''ii'v ' ,'' < 1k ' % r ra � l � , .'. � '✓} ifs „-e- 4- % �°' ______‘ ‘::- t '-' - _____-------.-.'„,:^1:#. i e .- *. _ - 2 a " .- r , -1'1-- 1 '�s ";� xi I w. K .:01 _ 3 b. ., rlm"- r^ �+ 't f ,4,4'4,,, �R 3rs, 1 � ._;t. v. `rr yy �. P �4r. ' E�I,. t ill' t 7 : ; -.''.'4F"' •' �K�_-.-. n F v ..� ti =k ��..) I r,;y4 ,,i `a„"1 ,r } 4,4‘,4.,Z)',4...:...;;.:.:/ e S' jr j �".. 4 'y y. 1� f' a J TTT t si y2iA s `er P i Wane% 4e3y�3►.; '. 5 Si'r Y ,4 y� arm• ?.'-',4 . I 8 �' +r TT-`' $,,t a.. "�:. $,tc3k,-..,.--.7 ; e y t int, y ;ii{ `'1 js_ 1 , -. 1,f'* :f ' i r'' . —, rit 14 r' �6i4�f-c„ � � b,.. � t `tel :/ :, »;:,4te.;,-10,....!,--,/ y ,,. x' ,...,..i.....1-',-...:, /tet01 A 401i lilf Edina Zoning Map Page 1 of 1 4c®4 O ; Edina Zoning Map Edina Planning Division City of Edina Website Zoning Ordinances - -1 'i l I , I i 6lii3 . I I,i it"Ivi � I { jr '',,I012 i , II ,r.,,,,,...! 61� I eg Dune R7'"1'3 8r11818 ISI it 7 but�'r I: ?� i ---..-----------'1, 1 ,011!, I 6012 ? I a,J2. 11 r11^I 1 I_ 1 f ____.—_5__5___5_____5_._._._..._. __..�..._._.__._._,._._..._.._._._ I. I i i --"� � 1:•,1-0.� 1,612 I h :;!.11 ii it f— I 6(i25 I 6024 6025, i CO24 i Legend II y 1tF,f i i i I'• 1 ' 11 ', � i I t16 I L"J1= I k, 28 I 6029 x.12.3 I ._• i;cal " -,�I , i .i-11 L036 t 6032033 6032 1 Edina Zoning -Y % 11)f l .' - rJi ._._-_ 4 1�• - 5555. �j. i l3( Edina City Limits �.� F,u,a r ,yl_; I I",I � 1 11 ' ..1,. -i 'i'-'=7 1 6041 6 044 .•c, 4 Parcels -� - - �-- ",I""I I ,i; .,1"" ..I.""" i 111 Districts -- ♦ `11" •♦� 1 1" tri; p , R-1 Single Dwelling Unit ! r : 1., 2 Fes! R-2 Double Dwelling Unit _ 1111 PRD-1 -Planned Residence ,,1,, , - PRD 2-Planned Residence n: ,:.„-k. ...,:.....,:.:...:: 141 ,, 1 ay 6109 55.55 : PRD-3- Planned Residence 1 . •�•::::'.�'�'�"•'••••�� u1 S3 C".13 2 5,555.. E. 1 r; `" 11 PRD-4-Planned Residence 113 =r., '`� fiffiPRD-5- Planned Residence 1,11.1 a 4 ® PCD-1 -Planned Commercial ,_r" 1 ,J — El PCD-2-Planned Commercial 6216 ,-,i E ' PCD 3 Planned Commercial I 1 21-15 S tb 7 t PCD-4-Planned Commercial 6 09 _ -r r POD-1 -Planned Office i iv .7rn.1:: 6213 1 4 I - ------ _ F `` t EjPOD-2-Planned Office -----1, 1 - 6217 r 1 RMD-Regional Medical ~ 4443 PID-Planned Industrial _ __ r+ � ' � 1-51!.11 •- ii 1 '0 ` } 44.893-93.331 Degrees . iuthd kG �:ho, ping All Rights Reserved Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Preferred Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Node (NN) 1 This plan introduces Neighborhood Node(NN)as a new land use category specifically for use within a portion of the Wooddale Valley View Study Area. Also see description and Table 4A. , At shown, at Wooddale Valley View it replaces the previous Neighborhood Commercial(NC) designation that was established within this area in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. i '., I LDIO' LDR 1 orOSP o I I is t .. OM (Pamela Park) LD LDR i ! .. a ' , - W.6, st fi'' ID AR '' v t: Study t. NI = R - `Area I a.fa. ti" , . / ' 1 k,q ! Y rt it g LD , F.." T ' , a 1 r R I t LDR -„."� 1 --® -I ter. t k I e <t. I t ` NW 1--I I �J / t— -- I . F� rt � Former • I .,i y I" ° I , L. i. 0C Neighborhood . % �' -- I It, Commercial Boundary ———--— J 6 z nd ` PSP W, 5: nd 1 , . ., r New Boundary of® .w ,•' WAG. ., , 410 Neighborhood Node'-.,,, ,.-./ 4. L�; f HDR i R i=. (-# LDR i? t I 1 N N Neighborhood Node(NN). High Density Residential(HDR). It is recommended that the apartment building located at the southwest corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, currently planned HDR,be included in the Neighborhood Node classification on the Preferred Land Use Plan,as shown above. I LDR Low Density Residential(LDR) Low Density Attached Residential (LDAR) 1 LDA Open Space and Parks(OSP) Public/Semi-Public(PSP) rtiN1 No changes are recommended to these Land Use Plan I classifications from the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. They PsPi i are all located outside the boundary of the Study Area. I Figure 4.2 Preferred Land Use Plan 32 1 Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan I Cf Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Similar to the Neighborhood Commercial category, Neighborhood Node: • Supports Neighborhood Serving Businesses. Encourages small-to moderate-scale businesses that serve primarily the adjacent neighborhoods. Primary land uses should be retail and services, offices, studios, and institutional uses. In addition, designation as Neighborhood Node provides: • Predictability for Current Landowners. Supports current owners' efforts to invest in improvements their properties by providing a predictable planning framework for the area. • Flexibility for Redevelopment. Provides greater flexibility to the development market by more explicitly encouraging the inclusion of needed housing. • New Gathering Space/Placemaking. Encourages intentional integration of landscaped open space and new formal public spaces. • Protection of Community Values such as Scale,Walkability and Character. A set of Development Guidelines protects the scale, walkability and character of the existing area by regulating the relationship of buildings-to-streets and the transition of building heights from node-to-neighborhood. Table 4A-Neighborhood Node Land Use Category(Also see Figure 4.2.) Land Use Category General Description Development Guidelines Density Guidelines NN In general,small-to Building footprints generally less Maximum residential Neighborhood Node moderate-scale than 20,000 square feet(or less for density up to 30 dwelling commercial, individual storefronts). units per acre(du/acre). residential or mixed Parking is less prominent than (Densities are further use buildings serving pedestrian features. constrained by the primarily the adjacent parameters of the neighborhood(s). Encourage structured parking and Building Height Limits open space linkages where feasible; . Primary uses emphasize enhancement of the Plan*). encouraged are pedestrian environment. neighborhood-serving Maximum Floor Area retail and services, Encourage development to comply with the Wooddale Valley View Ratio(FAR)per zoning offices,studios, code. institutional and Neighborhood Node Development residential. Guidelines*: A. Building Height Limits Plan B. Building Frontage Guidelines C. Gathering Space Guidelines D. Site-Specific Guidelines E. General Guidelines * The Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines are found on the following pages. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page I 33 4,. , , ti‘.:::: ' *: -..- I LLJ Q ::::' H L1.1 H c1{ '*1 x a_:1!':1:;::::?: Cn # nd 4 t it cn . '.ILr f , . t - 1.1. , / I. ^,1 it �- L.L em Z 4� , $ : in lN 33111 O0o { 'r f •�, �� W J W rY O I O — _ L71 WI 1 i . ' V*: 'l'". I y WO/ My ili:111; ` '� + 11.� r 1.-741 ix, t fu II N �: S .A:_ a 11 . k F ft E � 0 I 0 r, i Q y- ~ ', 44 W t 'or , O . O CD 4LCMJ1 A}ogigfiu Town Hall Station Written Statement of intended use of property: Town Hall Station will be a full service neighborhood restaurant that will feature Town Hall beers brewed locally at the Town Hall Brewery in Minneapolis. Recently, neighborhood restaurants and breweries have revitalized small communities across the Twin Cities. Today, many people wish to reside in areas where they can walk and bike to various food and drinking establishments. Walkability has become a common residential real estate term and it is dependent on the the existence of local restaurants. Their popularity attracts customers from both the neighborhood and surrounding areas that otherwise would patronize other communities. Money, from these patrons, stays within the community and helps attract more neighbors, more businesses, makes the community safer, raises property values, and much more. That is Town Hall Station's goal and reaching them is why the city of Edina should approve our request. The Minneapolis Town Hall Brewery opened in October 1997 after its founders graduated from business school and spent a couple of years in corporate America. The Town Hall Brewery has helped spearhead the resurgence of local craft beer in the state of Minnesota and has reshaped the West Bank neighborhood in Minneapolis. Town Hall founders Pete and Scot met as seventh graders in Middleton, WI. To make a long story short, Pete and Scot spent their formative years playing baseball at the West Middleton Town Hall. Ever since, the words "Town Hall" evoke memories of community, relaxing with friends and happiness. When Pete and Scot were reacquainted in Minneapolis, they opened the Town Hall Brewery. Scot has since left the Brewery, but Pete and now Paul, who joined Town Hall in 2010, have continued their emphasis on community. Since 2010, Town Hall has opened the "Tap" and "Lanes" in separate South Minneapolis' neighborhoods. Each restaurant has become a pillar within its respective community and has garnered praise for quality, creativity, design and service. The "Station" will be Town Hall's fourth restaurant in its fourth Twin Cities' neighborhood. Each one is similar in experience, quality and service, but they each have a uniqueness that's dependent on its community's taste and other specifics surrounding its location. The Town Hall Brewery makes some of the best beers in America with over 60 varieties each year. Town Hall has won more National awards than any other Minnesota brewery, with 15 Great American Beer Festival medals. Their beer is distributed and served at only Town Hall restaurant locations. Town Hall Station will provide an atmosphere where their patrons can relax and enjoy local food and award winning beer. 47 Town Hall Station — Variances Signs are so important in our society that their importance are often taken for granted. Town Hall's goal is to make useful signage that promotes our image, decorates our space, explains our product and eventually becomes an appealing part of the landscape, maybe even a landmark. One of the most intriguing attributes of the property on the corner of Valley View and Wooddale is its high traffic count. Our success is directly related to our ability to attract new customers, brand our site in the minds of those customers and create impulse sales. Restaurants continually strive to attract 20% new customers. Two out of every ten customers should be new or revenue will eventually sink. The majority of those customers come from word-of-mouth and exterior signage. Signage brings new customers and allows others to know how to find you. We were happy to hear that the old Wally's Gas Station sign, at the corner, may be grandfathered and could possibly be used for our project. The style of sign is consistent with our "Station" concept, as part of the decor of a historical "Roadhouse" or "Rest Stop" on Route 66 or elsewhere. The sign also fits well to help identify the new public space/easement on the corner and helps tie our concept to Edina's past. The rest of our signage is meant to be visible by passerby and to augment our decor and brand. If the business lacks visibility, it is likely that a consumer may never find us or forget our business even exists. Good signage is a constant reminder that we are here. The challenge of reusing the old Wally's gas station building is its set-back from the corner and the lack of visibility to casual traffic. The set-back and proposed landscaping between the public walkway and the restaurant, may make it difficult for potential customer to see or recognize our establishment. We feel it is important that our signage is large enough and that it is placed high enough for someone to notice. A properly sized corner sign and the words "Road Food & Local Beer" will establish our brand and let people know what we offer. Unfortunately, it will not be highly visible from the West. Motorists traveling east on Valley View and those parked in the Edina Village Market parking lot, may miss the restaurant altogether. We propose to paint our logo within the word "STATION" on the West facing exterior brick wall. The painted wall will add to decor, guide people to our entrance and help brand the building. We are anxious to establish a Town Hall brand and concept specific to Edina. Proper signage and decor will help brand Town Hall Station to the Edina community. In addition to signage variances, we are also requesting variances for parking and for building setbacks. The proposed plan does not include any parking on the Town Hall Station parcel, but instead proposes sharing parking with the surrounding shopping center. Part of the City of Edina's Small Area Plan goals for this intersection include making it a more pedestrian-friendly location. The installation of a public plaza on the corner with decorative stone seating elements will be a greater public amenity than the parking would be. The landscaping and sidewalks on the site are designed to encourage pedestrian movement in and around the site. The existing building does not meet the city setback requirements. The proposed patio will encroach into the setback space, but will provide not only Town Hall with additional seating for customers in the summer months when Minnesotans love to take advantage of the weather, but also be much more attractive that than current paved condition. Thank you for your consideration of these items. 4" In addition to transforming an abandoned gas station into a neighborhood restaurant, our project,with the City of Edina's assistance, helps the community and aligns with the Guiding Principles set out in the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. Specifically, our project aligns these principles: • Place. Helps establish the corner of Valley View and Wooddale as an identity within Edina.This new corner development will help establish guiding principle of Place by creating a recognizable and visually attractive space. • Gathering. Encourages people to spend their leisure time in the new public gathering space on the corner as well as at the new commercial restaurant and outdoor patio. • Neighborhood Businesses. At a recent event we held on site to introduce the neighbors to the project, there was a great deal of enthusiasm for the project. A restaurant that the immediate neighbors can easily access is in high demand. • Height and Size of Buildings. Our proposed restaurant will occupy the existing one-story Wally's Gas Station Building and will include a one-story addition, aligning with the Small Area Plan guideline of including one to three story structures. • Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood.The location of the project on the corner of Valley View and Wooddale allows it to be separated from the single-family residents by the existing shopping center. The patio is also set back from the curb and separated from the street and neighboring apartment building by abundant landscaping, creating a graceful transition. • Parking. In alignment with the parking goals of the Small Area Plan, our project proposes sharing the existing parking lot with the neighboring shopping center which is owned by the same landlord to allow us to remove the paved area in front of the restaurant and replace it with plantings that soften the curb appeal. • Street Edges. There is not intervening parking between the street and the building structure in the proposed plan. Trees are being added between the curb and the new sidewalk. • Circulation and Connections. By replacing the existing drive-thru areas and gas station curb cuts, and adding a new public sidewalk along both Valley View and Wooddale,we are creating a safe and comfortable area for walking and biking. By extending these new sidewalks to the north and including a new bus bench we are also providing a safe comfortable area for catching the bus.The northern extension of the sidewalk also connects the site to the neighborhood. Beyond these guiding principles, the project will help the community by: 1. Helps the neighborhood to become more inviting to younger families 2. Increases green space and reduces paved areas The new restaurant will occupy the existing Wally's Gas Station building which is made of brick with porcelain paneling above. The porcelain panels have been painted over and are currently a Ail dull finish that is peeling off of the porcelain. We will remove the paint to reveal the beauty of the existing original porcelain to relate the history of the place. We are also refurbishing the red extended eyebrow that surrounds the West, South, and East sides of the project. The brick will be repaired and painted. A new addition is being constructed off the back of the project. Most of this addition will be a matching brick construction, with the exception being an exterior walk- in-cooler that will be attached to the addition on the back side of the building.The cooler will be screened from view on Wooddale by the brick addition and from Valley View by the existing building. The new design pays homage to the history of Wally's by establishing an old gas station aesthetic similar to what can be found on historic Route 66. The patio in front of the restaurant is partially covered by a retractable fabric awning that will allow people to be shielded from the sun while they enjoy dinner with their neighbors.The patio is surrounded by a large landscaped area that will be enjoyed by customers and neighborhood passersby alike. As a newcomer to the area, my exposure to Edina was mainly in the areas of 50th and France and Southdale Mall. When I first visited Wally's Gas Station and the Edina Village Market, I was shocked that I had never been there before. Now that Wally's is closed, the corner of Valley View and Wooddale lacks an identity. I believe our project will help identify the neighborhood as it relates to other areas of Edina. Our proposal, including the infrastructure improvements and landscaping will draw further commercial attention to the area. In addition, I think today's homeowners expect their neighborhoods to offer a unique commercial experience along with a great place to sleep at night. Our project helps do that and will help do that quickly as we expect to open in early 2017. It is a great step in helping the neighborhood modernize by allowing its residents a place to congregate without getting into their cars. Most of our customers will be walking to Town Hall Station. Households have transitioned from driving to walking and biking to their favorite places. For many, our project provides a much closer alternative than other establishments in Edina and the Twin Cities. That being said, one of the current disadvantages to our project is that the neighborhoods walking experience needs improvement. As it stands, with high traffic on Valley View and a variety of walking hazards, the corner of Valley View and Wooddale isn't all that safe. Our proposal, drastically improves the areas walking and biking experienced by: a. Providing a new pedestrian friendly sidewalk and boulevard bordering both Wooddale and Valley View b. Eliminating very confusing and unsafe curb cuts along Wooddale and Valley View c. Providing a new pedestrian friendly sidewalk separating the Town Hall station and the Edina Village Market parking lot d. Improving a public right-of-way with trees and landscaping e. Removing the parking lot on the corner and replacing it with a public gathering area with decorative paving and stone seating A-9.6 The project is a perfect example of blending public and private commercial space to better the neighborhood. In Town Hall Station, the City of Edina is getting a partner to help develop and maintain a more viable commercial zone. All Town Hall establishments strive to become a focus of the community. The Minneapolis Town Hall Brewery opened in October 1997 after its founders graduated from business school and spent a couple of years in corporate America.The Town Hall Brewery has helped spearhead the resurgence of local craft beer in the state of Minnesota and has reshaped the West Bank neighborhood in Minneapolis. Town Hall founders Pete and Scot met as seventh graders in Middleton, WI.To make a long story short, Pete and Scot spent their formative years playing baseball at the West Middleton Town Hall. Ever since,the words "Town Hall" evoke memories of community, relaxing with friends and happiness. When Pete and Scot were reacquainted in Minneapolis, they opened the Town Hall Brewery. Scot has since left the Brewery, but Pete and now Paul, who joined Town Hall in 2010, have continued their emphasis on community. Since 2010,Town Hall has opened the "Tap" and "Lanes" in separate South Minneapolis' neighborhoods. Each restaurant has become a pillar within its respective community and has garnered praise for quality, creativity, design and service. The "Station" will be Town Hall's fourth restaurant in its fourth Twin Cities' neighborhood. Each one is similar in experience, quality and service, but they each have a uniqueness that's dependent on its community's taste and other specifics surrounding its location. The Town Hall Brewery makes some of the best beers in America with over 60 varieties each year. Town Hall has won more National awards than any other Minnesota brewery, with 15 Great American Beer Festival medals. Their beer is distributed and served at only Town Hall restaurant locations.Town Hall Station will provide an atmosphere where their patrons can relax and enjoy local food and award winning beer. 41c Z = 2 C Cw ,o s am 2 4... v) 0?5 as co m " F. C CO CD 4_, ,, N 0 Iiiiii O N rii Immit CC.441:11d11,Li I i ,, ;,,,..,, „,,,;„, .1,, ie.'. ,I.t:? ' c'-. Im ' 'f `i « ` C I. Niiitt ✓: Exterior Rendering Town Hall Station CI) Restaurant&Bar I Edina MN • , ' ''74 '-'' ' -i.' .i.,P-. .,.', .v•r .1,4! .. f•;,••• '4 f,„.,"'"‘ / • 4' 1 '3'. -Ili 1)if . • 7r^4,, .i I r, r r*s.•••-••k.. .v. ..*4„- +4.,f. as, , • i.'..., . 07.0...4- '4,1rr.441' ,,•;',!.''t.,4".,-,'". :1.:A`7.:44,4.` 1. - !,„,,,,, ir. ''' ki ''' -•••0`'' a. ::' rr'' IC ,P, .A ..:11.%`- '4.., •••„: vi .4. ...„fr..m-1,..•ii:11,4•.i 01 v•-•44:.,•\;•''4,', ,tio•,.,•.,' . . .,, ort -,..41.,-p-A-.P. ,,,,,•.,,, ., , ...?... ,...„., , t .. ..., ;)-...., ..,.., 1F C1161ht Ail HALL. ..,,,,4',-.:...: :.:, .1,..,F...,,.,+,,:. ,,,.;4, ...:.,.; ...... -.,., ,.'''1'.•''''''1•".. '''''*.",,* r.1•:•4,,. - , . I.4- ,r- •,•+,cip.siFir :• 7,,,.. • ' 3.T1ON ..0„-v$ -I-...lik, ..i'.4, , •-..../. , ., *..Z, ,:`'N''. - v, % ' ' •-,---?1' - ""'•• ' - ",:i 4.,,,' %Ye, lie 1 ..o., ,"..,-''N.op'T.,-,1,-„,-`,,,,,,,t,.,1-'f.1"r•.,c..4,-,•-mc..,,-' ..:t.r. - i,.. .. '.,-..:„. ..-,,, ..",*....e.•••'•i i j-.- *0. . TroA.) .:,.. ..,. . . ..,.... ..0.. . „ . . I , .1,i,,t4._ . 'A- ' •••- vir 1 ... .,. p.0,0. if •.-r.., , •• , ,, ,5 `'4, ..1: .,"-'' : \ ' • -A!7;'A....;!. /..- . ,. ‘,.4, '11.1.,...CZ.,,i';,1:-4,,,„,.,..,. ,' . ,,.#,..7...„,...• , • 4 '. i .i...:*7 e'". , .---. - ..Nt;: "' '.,...-,".',14 •-i-b,.- ni 71...r•,-.• -.4'''' -A.';,‘. r.:-.'..0.t. ' l''.' 7Ti.,:-.4, 4 4 -- •'•••P 2,-,/ f.., -':':, : •\. 'r''..1 , -''r, ;:''';'''.'-'‘°-€;.(- .7:::.`; ' .,-.;.• t 4 . . , ., liCr( - Of. 'A-,- . .'""" ..-4,1. ri,,fev ,,,,,.. er ...1--.., r *4, •.... * `, '' r‘*." 'i.,1"..'.4"..,•., .' '.' _ i*I''',L).^ ''..:`. b'''',4, ifiiia, ,,,-.-- , . „,&,, tir, ',• ` "'"'-‘.4," ''.,5. f t e 4 .'.'-lt;7k.„‘.1.,,'.:,4,4,,,,,t,,,,,,....r. :`-%,--,.„-,`, '.., ..,... ,,.• ., r . . i .•-v.-4;;;t;."1;..,-...-',...': '-- • - •.:4;',Fie .. . '.,. .1. ... . ..a.,,.. lit- . •.'• --- 1V,,,or....5...,.,,,,:re,...,. .....: -.....pe,- . 4 .,..,..4..,.,•. • +few,.. . '.,'N , . -, 2,1.f"rk .4 ','', • .,e, M. •-e,14PA '.' 'ilitili r4:.44.:e,gr •-.-...f t if r er . • *, •*. •...:. '?•'. .,;.,,,., „,...:•.,.. - s.*„.-...,,_4. :13f.-,,,,•;,.:,.! .•....• .. tereirci : P4'..''. ' 11/.4.7**. ''"';c%'ne.tVir.,.,4 '..''-,00#1 .,•- i-417,. `":::,..! , Ai.T4'1. * ,...* .,--' -..,.,, fi;-;•,p'‘,,4,.;1,f,.4.;.1,rrY.,ri0,%4''7•,',,0...:..••!•..V;•,*.r,:.,•,-.,,,.,1-.;---,'r':r-'..,'..4t4,*", -, ..44. *• '''•'''.''4''..2„-1,'LAti. 4' ..r .. .' .•' ''”. ..' RoAD - I LOCAL BEEiRir ,,,,.--. f.•:,•fo,•.rg•,+3,IP,I..:.,,.,_ .A'• ..z•--,..,A- . . , 4t-„. ,AC.:001 V-:AP. '' '. -t‘r?4-:,.'...,, -• • 1 ,, , r . ''....*V'air'*4..44'4.... i ir, , ' .' *"."1• " .*-, „.,,,, . ^ . .......... . '*I:1;AM"•:'..":*.',.t. dr - 13 , ;*.,-,-414' ..., i.'-% • - / ,.. tt. . j. .* -," ,.'N;(1„ . '•17: ;:,,.-,''' .-,,, „., 'ri«',' ;ii.,r,.,1 t. '2 . -1ft 6, ' ...'4'ili *-4-• -"..4e. • . , ,-,1,., - „ .. I .. ,_'- i _ i,„_:t, ,C‘.....'..,L.4.4,..:: •4,.,,,.?t.,..4,:767.9..-,...,...„,.‘, ,:iY7.4,,,--,:,___. *444. • "ir.',Iliirr,*"''* . 01,. . ‘. Apilll'>,ip,,.-;.,:,t-'-"tvg-`4.' ''' Ii - 11.-'' -' .r".-' I .r. —' ,jte-4..11, ! -,t.•f",,: '...•*.•40('. -.. •A .. "`-,, .-'.;'• -.. - . - ' I •-•-b•o4k 'Alt,' .- - ..,.... q •?.!.• i' '•'• .-4',''r'', ' ,. ''•.' '''''‘'''''.' ' . at ,i.,,-- - • „r-, -• r•-,', . - i.e.,: Uniniimmlim*, ' - '. r I. -.4re--.:. • ". . , ,,, ' - , ,c „ "4- rc. - .• ''''''-1 hi . ., ,. . ',"7.r.",i4rit• **‘,. --,,,;,,,I. , ,, ., 't-ktiffic.,0%, • . - 14 . AA - i - 1 ., .. -:.,.,' "-. -. 4.4L,4"V ' ., " • ,` - . * .,,-N- " ^ - —,, , ":"4"144%,..wisoit t ...t.,,it"--:',,r,-,A,,,c,.. -....!•-=',...-.4_1.,:-; -- — . . - '-'•',., - ' .-- -,•,----fr,,,-ti4 t.',4-...,'' '.1.4:-4-.. -: ....- -- , ...'. '''..4 -- - 4 r ' ' . . .i -' i -,7- ..7 ., , , ,... . -... , . . .. .. ...„ , _ — . ,........... ,... - . .... . -,.... .' Town Hall Station Exterior Rendering (II) Restaurant&Bar I Edna MN .. , "44' t 4":* 4' '' • ' '0' ' ''''''-,.‘d'k tr '''...t.'''t" i?..P,, - .' ',...: ' 1,4` Aki • 4,i .i. ' ir. .", • 't'., , , 2,!I ,.j,t•• 1 i #)1-i1,...,44* 4 , 4 . ?' - -,,i-,)kl, . .1; • ',. - '%40‘....- , Lk \ * , , • - ir ,, , ' ""41/4„:4,111t, -1/4 - 1 -4 :. • f t• . - ,... ..,1/4 ,,- 1/4C.,,,,A4 • i . 6 '': , . . . • • • . - ' '^liti*"'''•Lik gki:*\ . "'°'., -'7.' . . & LOCAL BEER .. .1.* • -,... „,,,,,,,,,,.:,,,,,,... _ i , ."* ,u, '' , d.,-7- ' v,.;,..-\•.; ,.,,,,,.,i , - v ,, 1 • ' , c„ii,r,mt-rw,lii WIN MN - .,' .- riT „, I ....."--4-1144,0:1,1-* ''''''''-titV...- t - •-slu . '4. f.-- ___.„. , 1 , _ --,_ _; -• „,...„, ..... ,Arr -----._ __ ,:. .1:114 .... ,..' .'' .r ' -1 ' 'Ilt"41;.'% ' ,-V., . ,. .....„,,,. ,....!i• i .,1/44* ' *.'*, "..*' ' -'• ' - ' - .„:42( 2.„...itt.r....-- - - , it ”" Atik*Airt.s.lk--4 -' , . iiiiiiiiiiiii 43$—Ivr4(0141: , ,,,,,,, . '' i 4'' , - • ...;', te' .”' . '----.. ,,x'-- . ',. i,... .4.,K,1 ,-.4.,*4. '.,,,I.1":;A:!:,,,ti;' v,' ::..-1 -,,..,, ,,,',„:„..t.,. ,,,t_ 4‘, ::„Iiiip,,,* , ..!.,1,,,,... , . , :'„, '4•:-.-4 l'''' 4*""*: 7- c'',.... .•6 '6 '' . "'r- ' '''‘,'.'''' - * ** - '''' .,-*''' *. ' ' '*'. . '' ' •.1.- ' ''''.'" ''•.."+ •• ' ,....• . . 4**,..- 4.1s. > H I a$ i --mR 12 --ME la 4H: 12 ,-pH:�l0.A8: 19.286.10.5 HE 14..5 BE 10.5 11162_10.5 21212 10.5 HE 10.5 p8: 10,` AH: 10.5 '21388126.9 98.8 94.1 98.7 95.4 95.4 96.6 95.8 96.3 95.6 96.2 94.8 99.9 25.'A.).A III •8013112.4 X10.4 •10.1 •12.9 X10.9 210.8 113.1 X10.9 X13.5 110.9 210.5 •12.0 •9.1 .9.1 I B a .� 3 111111® 116115 118119 114116 06111 116115 116118 16118 11632 MOSS ®@®m 9213 ®®®9 ®6 Scale: 1.acs,-4 Ft. FRONT SIDE i r •0.• \ ..(T1 Revisions I/ i .. c. '<''''`'.• CI e-,-,K.•Q9/ 3..9.''' O 3, 3y'6 1 ro�A• �4y ,O, -/ A . y ,�, .0. ./9.2 12 .I 9.l *til• j9� ` 3 -/. I p ' 3 �t, •0 • •�3; {9 .8 • N A L • ,- P, I G 2'3 • ?g' S, •• s O y •v, •il. ,� , .`� 47- I CTS Scale: I tort a Ft. Scale: I inch-a Ft. 0 PS N -H 1 3 W O N C7 -P -H FC [n p P-I >2 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE '-I '-I Z N rt • > a. RI C 0 30 -H These drawings are for conceptual use only 0 L and are not intended for construction. Values F1 1 U) represented are approximation generated from manufacturersphotometric inhouse or independent lab tests with data supplied by lamp manufacturers. L.5952-2285 I ., U •• ',. II 7,:;--,-, '..--7 I" If 'r:4-ir-'-1,,,L'IL' ,,_', .. - , - , -. : : /4 . .,--- -41, ' ''. ', -- :, : : ", :, , „ .,,,Z.:,• • ' -- '' -' '' ----'' ,' ,.... .'1' : : ;' '' r: ; rf :::: ; ;' i i i :.:i i.i,:: iif:,:f' ..,;7: :...,411 .• :' • ,--11 : . . f.' li :''''-t: f : ' r " =P4=Vf',, / 1 .: yr , , C.,:i.------,------.---,' • =7:, I :',. ,: .: ;.. ': ';' I ..:. .:. .i L' :/': :7 '.. r ,:. , , , - , - - :. - - - - : — - : : ';,. ',..;-acfs..±:„Lr„... / \ , I .... . . . . . . .1. ,.—,. , . • . ., ..... • . . • . ' i" F i' l' i " '' ' ' i: -.• ,... r r : . - ::. ,--,2-...,-,_,: :,r :::: : -,, : .„ , , :. "''...-71) : '.::';\ : : rrrr : f r •.......L • !. E. „.. , , , ,„4/, , , , , f r :'L-----L2jr:-;,----:_r_t :,i: ;•,;r :r:\ . .;:),,..',-;•A''',:;,:,::: :*) I: :' r: r 7: :r f .4 If : f:.": f : :ri.,, : : r : :"- : : : ': "-;:-.' : r ?.--r,.,,,i*y: ....i- ...Y.' : : •,,,\i>,,...ri 1 r 1: ir I ri ri :Tr r r 1 1 :,,...,,L.: F i q--1:.. :, :: :..;H................ .. ,,, f ... ...,.. ._"., _. _.. ,.. _ ; ... ; ; : IEF4W; I 11 o:niT' mil 111 W,22W .... '11 OWW. r., Mii F....s, P '. 2;F.',': -„• .,-„, iPw •,. Drawn By: Kathy Frey Town Hall Station Checked Sy: sr, R . tr, e Lunn,Soles Associates . 4500 Vallyview Rd Date.9/2/2016 tts Sales Rep: Steve Hahn -r,-.7.- woe".rod Contra* Edina, MN PAGE 1 OF 2 — Scale: AS SHOWN A447 b , SAN_M.H. - \ RIM=889.13 60 SE INV.=879.7 \ \ -- 10"NW INV.=879.7 °ea�ax \ s '(.C..I / \ xeas roe x°r s `/I/41.)^ 1r, / ° \ LSC, x / N ,$o A0\ bb( \ 1 // C ,`, />, Nei \ ° /\/ I// °°°le, °°�'. I/ i„,,,, / O\ / ems, ue 1// /1 1'� c, x \ ., �', �.,a /rO RIGHrI_ 1 -;-.7--., e° _-o ° • 0:: '� 1 ,,,,,‘,-(:4,,,T, ° \�� \ OF.h,' �� - 890-_��� p� °�4eo 0 r \ `�` ' 7 5,.,_>� ° ''h �,\ _\ aso\\ °x� �y#1"11,q5'x°9-oe _� y, -1 /3ze \. r eso.x e 4 7sa : g•9a bu/rL4j \ a/v _ .rj'� ba° ///7„a �r MINOUS ��-„...,-.:.,,4,<._ R.;�1 -.„___,______t___ ;' c\ .6\a ", <,/ L._FF x \ , 1:. .21 %'-)yFF EL=890.81 // t�s Xe., 'o a Is °j Ni 817uM\,y ( •I `L• y -�/ (•0 A\ 6$.>?'. -�1// EL=890.0/ti�u/ F esOd a4 FF j// ,,,,• ° i NOUS l e°,k y�v TT// 20 \ / \ ° 1 n 3 /1 / COi/yO�OTPRINT STORY}hEW EL=890.98 y.51.6 \� \\ lJf e9 �. ,%•0.0- 20,g ^tREq B(gC0/ROAD FF r/j 5\ 6 4. • I `\ \ \ \ b0.::. SET IA$h ly Bl]O EL=891.10 J' 90 °• 9.6 \ / • ,... .88\s1 04' \ ..`.... /,.//:././// - f/OyT 5T0 FF- y _ L1Je '°&, / \f FF N EL=891.01 6 \r' A \'8 .. .. f EL=890.5>_ S O/NT p~ n - 1 ' 4 n rEL=890.54 4 If I °°'' • yy RK f�0.7-,t a 3h/ m C / rD°°c / (� I:41.----- I \'\ s rri a ��/J LIJ Y'd �e dds r °° 2 c 4. x.I - x0e d\ \ e / of•m t� • / y x / i cyc �.'.;.;','' 844___ kII Ar QAC_ ///c / \ / -.....,L L�,/1 .. i...,.: \ . °°' I W -.\--1-- -067- $2i/. -/ \ //\/� \\ �' o �.:. N. .x 1• •IE e, F • lk ----'s----' `: " ! iRµ/N\ �� I L/ L it > C \ `\\ //- / C rMtjs� °w,x fr - d/rtti\ a esl /°?: J,Ls r � / � � s / i - -/ .ae.xl I` I - \ :x ..P�'G Yq ` I; \ I1 i' • ��. eel.3 d '� \ ` 1 C d ` ` \g e,KI I \\\'°u` •r R� / e add B/,uA.�/Nou \\d / P 4 \\1 \\ - C °. - r \�•,Bes` / s Ott, \\ s 88�\ _,I• 1 °e, A,, 90' T\ o? C ' b°j \ ,\�.-88q\ °B6 \ \ a 6 C® „x\e?i_d�\•: "��� / \\ # ee ex \\ / III J j�_/ / �G. '� C.� %° OrY� \9>\�`�`.e �\ "\.3 I ` \ 23.9 o w +c: n nom, 0"`00 �`\�a^ \�.: ae� a 'S: / //////5.6 . 30.4 / / r ��% �:,.r �'� // \ 1 4 00 VA VIEW R1:)(,/,/,';: \ Blr MI s75/ °�, ` 2. / R,�O \! ( /1_§T'Y BUILDING/ \ °' A'Ou5 x / b/ `\ 8B/@ 7/7-4 0/-- ' © \ 1\ /F00 1 7=1961 5. );c°sy r•C} e N. 0� Bl� �' 82"BdJ`��'a� eyi.axl \ // : !•- e \ / / �"___ 5,`', - ,. �/IFS ' 0 :L:--::,fix ;. ::T.Pi.: \..... xB so °/r \ \ / ( / °/ .�(� te a.`` ' \ ,Itt,.!:'::'::::.,.:-::-:N. °'' \ •' \ b9 \ °'`' I \ ( ethlbb O em..` � 'rt -'\�\ �` EL, O.Pr'"....',::=.";,..2--ti :j :;::seas ``` ,__FF ro IN \\ b / \m \x\ r q ` \` 1 I \ 1 ('�/4, /bbd ee ,''�8 e%\ \ it s/R.C\\'15? ^ _8g9. \ --'1 v - ' \_ \ \ \ �1//�I`\{l T-\/ ay4i\\;' \ 1-0 U-too' \::.'s/ \ \ \ ` 2\ (� (_- /\ I //r_ ,`ems...\ �d�ii x°'ee`II °a, a, m ' v •lr' 4' \ UUU as r�6u lf-\v ::: x �p^1 \` °G\Oq/T OF Wqoil °•l\��I ,5ss..\._ ';''.• .... a°aq\°D �' \6L/ i 0 J `\ a m 3,./T �` I' 1I / \\ s c as xoe err sea, '.'��. _ \._ '�I ( saeso.`I +c. i f!�(! i�S `� V ^t- k,.. \ n\ / _,-seg ee ." �• _.91,''''' +- x:0 l 0,,,._14/ \\ er -b r C'/1/j,A/r_ \\ r /2S Tr,2>a ° ° rob D/ d ._e ENERAL NOTES: \ \ go s. ?tos °°� ,e bearing system used Is assumed. \_ \ MONITOR WELL_I he location of the underground utilities shown hereon.if any,ore approximate ELEV.=988.95 \ \edd\°B°� .PURSUANT TO MSA 2160 CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(612) ti, ` -0002 PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. er Sac ubjeeot property is identi0ed as being In"Zone X,Other Areas'on Flood MONITOR WELL_-'' \ ra a Rate Map No.,27053C0364E,effective date September 2,2004. ELEV=889.33 \;,__ 'otal site area=85,275 square feet=1.958c I `�) Ole area Parcel =64,914 square feet=1.491rc Site area Parcel 2=5,634 square feet=0.129 acres. ryc,"4-‘4,1„, °4 Site area Parcel 3=3,925 square feet=0.090 ac Site area Parcel 4=10,802 square feet=0.248 acres. his survey was mode on the ground. \beds, �x rent title work was furnished for the preparation of this survey.Legal corded or unrecorded easements and encumbronces are subject to on receipt of current title work. ....don datum is based on NAND 68 data. 000(NANO 8B)=99.814(NGVD 29) 3enchmark is located Top of Neil(AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) ation=690.28 A e R H€ A€ lig =ate µ r aig 2ii Q • .r.to ' .0/4 4-,9 NC LL-.LZ Ome�1 e ,O '2Hyyn + `_ 8 o ml 8 a —1111- RIIL 1111 ii/0.�� 3'6■�i ��I._ ,:z 1 i it rio,,,i _.ffemp ne-. et!'" ri — 5160:45iii r® '� Eim. ■■�I C� •■• ii 1. ■fig • II III .. NE M iiit1i• - • ' _ al 1. a1 MIME ... •I. _ S - al 15 -, IE -- /V 0 ■■ o Ii : •• a_ �1.00 1� ' a a1 II a E IlP= LEE a s 0 NI l; ii Omi •■ ig I 1' 0 •■•on. sow am • �. 11 1 .1,:a.' d0 OIlVd„6-Z0 tv I' ' I \J e X27 zoiii ,a!%A %. , v X / / • / ii �ii _ i \ �%, /' `'' L I. ''} / , i.�.. 1 •----- // x a± -' i ?tom / PT:-s, Pi F.$gm a ..... ''' x'' I 1 zaJ k t o i' i u. � j e M w r i.1 X f •�� • 1 �r // ,‘5, �a ,y I.��.gi� j rit to �,/ .. I • itil- Az u ♦ ....�.�' ■■� if II7 ♦, 0 �U J / 2`X Ii1----5 ill ( ';- :TTiLj '� c'i(-.,'',\- -e,'-••5',2,•i.•-•i.c 7/J ! i :: ` R \■■ ■■ ■■i ■■■■� Q 1 , 1111 / °,, � R - ..spa '' 4N 54 4/8.,.,-). c„`} \�aP` ,g'� • \ —\ --'1 % ° A' co c, �. .q 6-, Cly”` tea, i•V•. c-1, % J- 91 /]v y� y`' ttt{fjioE ' '° ' D H " ,y 5koa g z .. . .gaga ''o m F o » £ g 2 z 1° "F H I L - '-i o:! ' k 't a F, I 55 n ^ N '4 x (f) N Y a 5 2Q N f p PROJECT TOWN HALL STATION "� v 1 AMdi xy x �_ O� �`" 4y 4� a Na£$5 4500 VALLEY VIEW ROAD.EDINA.MN 11: 3g�,Orpl_0 0 `g o € TOWN HALL TAP ' ' f �, m o ., 4810 CHICAGO AVENUES,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55417 5 9R, . 1J, i GIbSS NW'SIlOdV3NNIW'S 3f1N3AVOOVOIHOO1.84 � ZZ O E=�44 aA i dhl ll`dH NMOL fail?,il < gl o CPi0i !?i NW'VN103'0VOi1M3IAA3l1VA 00Sb Is==1:i *g -E' O s# gse1. "' € as 0 am- , R>�' : !a U)_� NOIIV1S 11VH NMOL " `"yl ' a� E 6 •• * ,1- ' 3 ' . . '2'L'1 '"g ! `,1 1 4() 1: O o 1 w o S . ; d I o¢g E m 3,i •it o a VII `Ili. of 9 1. z Fi$F §4� 'S g$! Fo6 �� Z ' _ 11I � I < of @o ' Gam w z e ' OI I Ij ( I I 22 w; w' a w- g� __--.° ( - w • ❑-0 e LI I g q ru n . _ , A i. l ... _ - -- _.... -. — 00 X; / -31',-.) -. , Gni' ( 1 ,, /A/ yr - �. N IN(lI n ,.� /T ti \ - r `Y' a: U ` )6' 1� a.iFa. - aat...a.3a...ansirr �.. ,v, , ,,_, „ _ -isriri / Qty / - J __ �� a E`) -<' •4 0 \/ e -6 6' o, 5 ; X/7 �X'. II X'” X : '3? !. ti•^ . ,-- $� , ''• °� S i • gam. 9 ! — // ,,' • Cr' 4110 off• ♦s 4, / / •�•••,C�; / 'dry ��/ J1� ��. C) t §E- / A:•�•.�errrr • _` • ` ' . / ) �'^'' - v o ••ire• CFA TQ'` I/ t i / /� p m co cb n- -(1/', • t/ ti, fi! Vit' / 1 ' lr,` /' / o r ♦-°� «-,_ .` /1 ,y <,. ./,../ I/ // 1 �X ! / / 4 .. ' 4j' '� 1i SCA /, / O- ,,--,_.6_.,...2 7.. 1-�a•....u�.....-- 0 ,7 �/ 00 k1 i ' /' '7"-_ / / 11 / j t /f �. I 41. • LL699 NW'SIlOdV3NNIW'S 311N3AVOOVOIHO OL9b G,w<. ZZ� , 6:_ �4,4 ` 11 dV111VH NMOL 3651.= s F a0 w ioC Cb `[ NW'VNIO3"OVo M31A A3TVA 009V ' N�/1 W i •`'i Eg �4R � m`s oe Oo �I >c- y 'Ee g $ `a_ atl• pA Zz • ��P °15 NOIlVIS�11VH NMOL Road =iEur` W g Ha` 2 '1 g: 1 oft ;g1 g a ! C:: : : S g t7; ;g1 s 5 3. W= Z R a E e go g8 g s , g ! 1 iii 3 s H. E° :' s &ll a _ T a a xo !e .a a 64- 0 3 Ise 11 i ! ` ; 3a - e o ' o b E3 05 o 15 'gill 8l,a RE- 5. I; io g p ;jC , LI S ,4 11 ! 5 ,, ill*t t 10 -8-iii 3 qg g l 8 d w g 3 m E5 kw 3 1 w sod 'a 3 s m > ! r 5 dao z C €d ' s Co gR A s €s„, gC> A oA C � og _ m �=�wa wa = eoms i g< ..� � . yaw qs � 3� O Lq hil AI rs _< 7 d L§H� a v8_ fig;a"6 i a 5 ..8 d b°� R b ° 4 i 11 Ili, 1 z - s® : i 4� 5 2 x i' ,f 9 k3CY4 `A 5 i 3`4� < 1W 3 wy:ggg 3 4az Z b C-C- 8 gg5 ii ggig .0! W 8 b lk 5 1 w ° 8 14q a a` m « 'a ,t- 3 24; 0§bI, piii,1§ 6 ;a tlodi ° mil = gi031,, yea o g�'��= H S _}' g g'=asa a 5e 22s� a 5' = ae V` is `asni N e.£`,,Nk rg gk ,< m b s;5C mx°8C8 31 W fr: Qa'"Sa gb 5 b� 3� 5J% 116111111 naai3l?=8 s s° g1d1§aspsi iliCC o 1 C=a88 Il1aa@ll z 1 *1712 �tI, ceiN o '',r,! NE' IIilI� grinI � suy �t l` ,K 7..'7, 1: 1:1 ,, =- -�I ISI -- ---- „- (,vi7,-A.0 11-,0„a ,1- f1d 6 -6` - SfQ JIv (lii8 e ,, A\6o• , -,,, 7 (---I N i /„,,, ,,, „ c ( " „„ \/ L�, --] , .b., .,,, %% ' �2_- fir, , I X1111 lad Iy1111 _7-7 — ^, 11 j s icoot; '♦ / J / E!tJ / 4 i i;2 pl”. i ' ' I■ �I % / • t ��3 ' to II 1 I C, ,- i u o� / L I `1 1 ,' i er, 744 '11p-,-;loc, r , //, / , crs -,,,,,,,1 ., 4-114. ....... ' . 4---,7 ,,mu, \ ee , �, L! 1 / / doh ! _ n I 1. I�1\\' /: 9 �' - --.S'' dull _ II I .. C i �O C / / / (Y —' i' I I / 7� .,I � J/�i� l �.v emu ' �'�".�, �� '`� -,,„:---k. l/ i , 'i►Jame \ 441.11 CY 0. li LI.6SSNIN SI1OdV3NNIWS 3ON3AVOOVOIHO 01.81 G.g; z ei..-4,t= si gi dV111VH NMOL t g a CIO ;: l .g. r a 40‘q 10 NV VNI03'OVOLIM31AA311VA 0056 .mac= - AI 3 x x y �I�€ga �!S s �1: e' E o1 z s9 7¢aoE ;103 sm o p e �1 l' NOI!VIS 1-IVH NMOL oaa `.%a' as ^a So dg m LL = gg V _ m N ' l sE sa g 'cs .g mg � 'i go o!s s 'g wi r a mmv, nm mm a xa o s g vtg = =a es rc 222 52 22 s ,, ng 3 g i 3 C EA S I.$,. s 3 c$ '6.! ^i, a gig d 888 88 -- _„�� _. Ir m't 1,1 t —� 3 sW g r,x - a o a m .1.'8 9 ,w 3g a¢ ai se eV,y v2 d Sm_ zg s w ff ~� g„ §m ; FO 5 V Z6 mmm mm x z m m , g « o �' R 11 i h id h yi s ' p 5 €o a rl "nI is IiI all§a o tg `ag><1 � t� a F 'Ie Vxv_3?a '''"'-• ‘g 55 - em gil m g ''41131. m� #% 3� 4y f a V J 6 Sg. EA Jail Ar uEA. A o gi li o RI 8• H 1 II S 0 ii 1.7) § w LI E m 3 < r $g5 /6 sea m am g g o ' 9a- W -,o _ . g„ i w gga> sVw g',; 1'1 '.— `s s . ,- Wo4 L:_, ogleIti o i it .i4 o a o § s ? 00§ig asg, Ea' g EIEE < g IL gm co a I- S .fi‘S".! m3 i; Yz33 HP. �S � l �• 2y h m V 1 ..-lit, - LI 111 1 1 . ' .,,Li� _ Rte® , Tom. -?l p .+,t i `� 1 1,• �e , 01 LIt' </(ham' J — �.. • �•Df,'i 7� „.- i o � / r: — jilt? \ Ptyk 0' , ,- ,I',N-N.-NF—,.:r(-r-- . 00 Vin/ , V/p�1115,,,,0744 ,Th x5 `0 i' - _ , t :11..:12:444414, , l� j t � p:”/:/' 71 4 ����� tg ,„ , fi sm i,�,'� ��� , / am. + � � 1111/ -- 1 it , ;;x , N�j \.._y; % '� l ,, zi,. I f_— Al3 :)a !i LL493 MN-3110,3 5M W'S 3f1N3AVOOVOIHO OLE, s'-w"o '- �W x�' €�i dt/l ll dH NMO! ht F W e s U z ,40 A3 co III NW'VNI33'OV08M4IA A3l1VA 0094 L:i 855E p s pp t m g a +� g Cdo'eo�'£w �'7 i i 6 o e w V iii ��ap NOIIVIS 11VH NMOL 3Oad -� aY= a =a p a 3 w z = : g -w got w2 o Ems 1 _ _ a il'� ; o o ga sow q NP;P g m € € e a w F Z - VR,.f, o g a a3 aIy� ' 04 o g g W&Eew9 ¢ :2 2a '3'or'2g g.'4 s o 3- a L, d w 0 -05 Lq n gg 01 P qv PO !FA i _ E igE 'R 8 21 "� Y o s '1r g l"� s '..".Wigilg s ag;t; was l$3$3 g gg X38 w 1 og .2 55 0 zz 6HI o $ p 0 21ci.ls wg t<is `'�wb „Ei,12 �LLmz �w o' E 0� u a�"da L., i. ! g%10 =o sRiae Wt 5Ion9 E3 83w 3R a gig '''a g ' o 2 5-- =t 0 9__35 g "_ ='sc ' .a sig l'i o _w� do ys gin;, las =o g a pl c. - I V; z �n 8 : �s y $ w' _ �w ss �3 ag o w $ ►i, N — 6- s ao z IN .. m aw1 o'E $u Z " G Di _ e m a 0 _ _ -_ _ - _ 0 .. X \\ v �, ti _x -:.;;K-"--- ./ q M- - ,G ^ , U G ;5'9 R`�'�q�j• 'i (( w°j7 30 1- d -.4-,-113c-id) , �. '(l;'�i,Wi1!.I8 .. n \ tiX \ r _ �i G g ( 1 i" .!.1 \y i `L z r / ( I\ e m 0 6 �� O SII $ oz :0,5 (\V� 4 0 •:��i/ J eA - +c� 1 III ' -- >� ^,1331.L '7 ' _on_ 911 uiix c mito c0 c I j I �1 `02 i 0 ° // j ` r i 0 it I 2- Cl 1 . \ ` ' f .o"11-1,` .ii. . iv [L�• o. i I Y I' ', Y I /� ui ice` .i.---7-.6 /./, 1.5, if ll k� ../ _891----o7„- b a�,c s gi c c ' gyp' co °/f% - `` 2) ,,,/, _ 4, 4 /_li,... s; X g m g e i s ' -Lls 6 C / a;y 0 a z os- U 3 -: ,/, , If 11,4-i.x.,_,1, ,,,,,,7 -------27 \ : • \, Irl C,.> �� � : `'' T 1 Via, o/ J �\\ x , I ---- .4-4,- '-7/` ., : , ,'-.-77--I:---46 /C � G h e! a° 8 /�,\/! .� \ \ \\ CO '� \ \r\iii "`� '�,G ^^ \' 1/0:- It I ,/, ,, / , ,/ , , c. , , ) ..„._ ,G.../,,, : cs,„ „ s„,,,, / , ,,., \4_,_�____1 / ,,,,,,/, F, / c„,?, ,, ,,,,, / / , .,,,,,/ ,„ ..___, if, ,,, , ______ , , / / „... „„ /, , \, /, / x , , _.,.. //,,.„ ,, ,- -,,,,,„ „.,.. / , ,,„ , , / ISI / 11 al h ; / _\ \ .i=, $ A X o„ /7.-----,_ =4,'' 'ff; '>(-- --41EINEMMIWANW,-EriltS%.. _ ., f / g.),42117 7 "-'S 'mmo. El. II._ k_ . ltdi&\ E8 0. I 1, e it 0 , // z I x �, r 1; 1 is m , 2e cv !1 1 11 1 Cr o '\ j :'U Fi `t� I a ?'' cis c --------z -,,/, %,„. ... ,„,,,ng,,,:,„mif..„/„, C GS -Si q '''it ' ' . ,RIgcs -,..? 4 c, co ,, O, ., � J iimmu/ , yc- II .' �r— ,, ¢ —,' Tc hi ,z� 2y -, X ll � / (-..; •'-',;:,'-.'' ''' 9,''' Lo C:' RI ; ,I ., ..,, cb go '' \\\ '''5‘) IA ,_,.. q.;‘,..v,,,,, i . i „,;_,4„ , ,,, _.,..0.,, , x, ,, , , • , .::',2;,..",-! v: '4.) : ; .,V,I:,i-i--.2,t," L___ '''• L'4„ .•�`. 4. 1 . i 1 Q 1 11101 ",- $ - "� - % r EB g: `9 R \4''1 �g� \ 1'� y BITUMINOUS �'-. G ��n `q �J `B '' M • -�._ o_ i. • n l x = c, I oo I O z f,I ' n m F, i"8 y N o ' m o €gam til 2 :L1, > m$� Y .1! ! i.12:; !! � E F. -1;H ,: IMP;- a PROJECT TOWN HALL STATION �� a m;�. :,, F,. 1Q "p m�o'W x3, y NSp.e:: Jl C) i �� 0 11 8 8°sem=° 4500 VALLEY VIEW ROAD,EDINA,MN i!, co „�rF,.+) 6.N &' o=hm ' TOWN HALL TAP § i ��- ® Z + € 4810 CHICAGO AVENUE S.MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55417 g 3 91 y) t�C 11 LIbSS NW'SI1OdV3NNIW•S 31INSAV OSVOI HO OM g O e d R s,iiia g ,, a �'W db'l lldH NMOL wing W c ear ids -7= 1gg m N . 10ig1 04 0; NW'VN103'Otl021 MBIA A3llVA OOSb spa;`o W 'q E' m e„ �„ NOIIV1S 11tH NMOL 3Otld w„ilii a "a p g W ET- a� g 3 X. o ”g$ . m i ems Q h w deep- a R o Ecl w o g w,, 0~€ .ig � o a .4,15 1ems € w �: Z w• i S i Priii:o i a ow =w E42 .9i o ,n i $P g w i y -i0 o S i' �d` :p Eo � 'g 3 y o E w i�� a Mr'-'9W �a h�<m ww �� Neal ��= o' w o § 1g �� rw- yQyQyQyQ a £ E -LL w aagwi i 4w y;,n W 4 a 6 : wg w�: g i ' i y w w O O ' o < a c v= 3 ss„gW,1_ Lw ft 8s nim » a=g"`' gg = >2 1w g , E. z z 8§ g e2; < amwm<mgE s ww R50 �g,pEg s 3 g�o aw _ € ' W! s < i V-4 E E g` a < oa lilt gag 4,8 < gao 5;gai'w _ 5¢ -o i”`3 5 _4 H i=M 5 ¢�H= a Wis g gra w� ; y= mgY c _ 4 V d is ag w . gi N g o w,lEi , w w:4V a3 1w'� l = wo; m i=-" F w — b o ; 1Mi 4 1; 11 LL , Wig' l .1%5. i a p ! & w 1 •of °w N a ,, Aliii zQ„ s 5e3 egoqJLL _� _„ o ;s �w a N o PUSHY ei e!E<" `„g i'2-esas'ww pl w §gi g;g'a .2g g 'g IMAM s� ag a �3z ��s����wg� >sp m�� i ���� �w w� w � w L.::, Im<og €w's € € lgfl3Hi€:111w Baaasa i . as ' Hag ° a • , / .i i/ H=OId �1811d) 4) �. —1 '---------------/ -------------„7-- ---- t r— --- --- __ _ — -- r — \ ; ( i i t; ( 1 iii 1\/\ / tisnoNlyclia ui \ A E, I w - _ /A ,�& LI 11Iit..,-) �bcp, I ' --- Ir-r.I ,v . gig II,"7" . Ti7- i.,, ^ ��� .1 � `,i .v3:::,,,,,,-,y,,,‘"1:140, -'&/ �. • b it • ,W . o ,1 �� , / y a 711®J t<1.:::::11::1;.::" 6' / ,` I i1 /.�' i i wou - 1 n �� w'�pjj/j � / 1 1 r 1 r-'4- p — �' // �� �ii�iii—►.ice® , , 04 Iffillww,i 11/11111111114- It ,. //,47 , iiiiiiirOr7N :,/ ii ' w a { Www f ,, o i �' --,h z ! /W ---_, rgy/ / d .:3 -„/ // \ \ r r / . \; ;/ AW /r � y� °r l y / ;_ 'ate i w"i'tl-1_,>4...-_--__,,,,.„___ EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GR OUP '11',A.11-4/---- ,+.`` .� EE SwPPP ON SHEETS SwLDsw13 p ��' . ,�i it 3. °9J .i. .1',.‘::, ,, <S L. ',,c „FM' s ,®.:,>+a., :"�.,`ou-z.Pxw, ,r, Na/`a X Fni,M IIA`.,z /�V.i t�l( ` G �:.. Q5.5. o 1ch r P G Jt � h d l?"17-7'1--11". mu s„-''''' -...-'1•*i\T'''-1-.1-r111-.21-°'' (.� r , rr ) �\ RE ti. P 1 cl PSN W.F. `` i EL 390.81 ' , , Y�.. \ .K/1 VA Zi{q ,T 1G INV. 9?4.l FF , 3/ ���iii '°fie' El.-690.20TI ,,'"„AL.-.A.. �/ 31 MAil I i 1-11'11. / u G L'l ^'N- tag EL=890 9r: � '///(/ Earl 5lrC 0A -L-.9t 10._- /° rte I �i 1 ' I. .! / 61W,r.'�'7 .r Fi _ rn -,- III L1_JI ,II .y EL 7 1 mREMOVAL NOTES: /7 EL-890.52 NGr r rif �// I ` /�r ,,g,,„/�� N _F. /' ` ,,,(„ ,,,.1"t' /• ..�4/ ,I I SEESTORMwaEMENT w POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ISWPPPIPVN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER 'C( i---21-,. / i , 7-// .\ EL 90.54 .,,'ti V /.-%,,,,,••4„. ERflAAR SCIA,I• 2 AL OF MATERIALS NOTEDON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE NACCORDANCEWITH MOOT,STATE AND / / (\¢ 1./. ,y r q 4f �_: IS / J '�G 1�j////•� / n\ ���J4, ( JIiII CO116Ul�Gi�l > REMOVAL PRNAFc 1111.171665H4lL SECOORDINATED WITH UR1tt OWNER PRION TO CONSTRUCTION ACT'4 r .I 89 r.___„,, . 'T? G`. / ;' \\ c . E ¢ ,I�`*� /.1 ._Ja ISTING PAVEMENTS 66141.6 B•SAWCUT w LOCA rs...WO ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST M,`-7 '-f.'"'-',.'..:- CC//;/l//.- j -.,°,,:-.. PA a,, I - II s REMOVEDT FOR MTERIAPROPOSED HALLB'DSPOSED OF ioA GAL OFFsre LauroNAND IN ACCORDANc c^ �'� :-':-.11,1.4..• • I j1� L i r ACCORDANCE MON 'l ,/' l 1 l•> r'`;.1. "�1.A; / p, .. , W aF.T d, i 1 REMOVED Lou REcuuTIONS BP `\'t f %'- hr / _ A ' '_0 _ . u I i ouGPQ '� 6 ABANDON,REMOVAL CONNECTION AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON TA:DRAWINGS ARE v'pi J. / /v\ Ji__s�' 7 i_o / 1 G„"`. r/ I., 12D Ruglx 1_ i 7. APPROXIMATE.cooRo nwrE WITH PROPOSED PUNS. Z z (' / EXISTINk EESi'l Ex51NGONSRFEATURESDFOR REMOVAL SHALL BEFROTECTEDTHROUGHOUTTHE 0 Z / / \ / / / k - //y' - [,1 I iRl �� DURATION OFTHE CONTRACT. :II / �,vl / /'� ' J I'A-yyd TROUGx Cv� & OPERTVLNEs pGENEIUL COxarNuci ou uM rS UNLEs5O1HERMSE NOTED ON -V":,/:---- \ r•/�� ? / /L rj41 -2 r THE DRAWINGS.WORN WITHIN THE DEMOLITION EMLCOxSTRUCT ON OMITS SHALL NCwDESTAGIxG z O. a r�'H � / R'�' 1 ,� •� �. e&....167.Y.'•*-,I I N xsaswsunscoxsmucTaN SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. Ea w w Fq `\ / I + y0'� �y / Y,JQct J\I �:r I b�Y 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OFPLAN AMC PER CITY ITHE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LINTS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN Z l .-/ / Gj" / £ \ \.7"/ IA��,+1; I D DA6.acE BEYOND THEPROPERTYLBITS auSEO BV CONSTRucr ONACTry TV SHALL BE REPAIRED INA O J - r„ra: �T, D BY THE ENGWEERAANDSGPE ARC6ATECT OLIN ACCCROANCEWITH THE CITY J cc Q _ / j ~�x ,- ! PROPOSED WORN E18u6DwGUDCWus LLNorpsruRBE EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE J 3 Z Y, y Vie; _ I snow,0N1HE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCION j / \ �. I SHE SECURITY MAY BF NECESSARY AND PROVDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM AND THEFT W Z Z X2e � :+ �� ns4 r I? I r THEORATONOFTHECONTRAC SECUR, Z ' >x r'�,L}� Te° � waL°6NA« NNACCO°DAANCEmN THEW;,`�r„�N`"rSN � :; ,fib k F � e. 1.-J I VEMIO IARACCESST THE SITE SHALL BE KumAINEDFOR DELYERN..INSPECTION ACCESS WRING Z 0 p �� // � TIONOF ADJACENT STREETS POISBEBLOCKEDWOUT ITHOUT DUROVoxoFTHE ITNrw TO a I- �f / CJI aTIOxGFADFN6REET68EBDKEDY,R�maPPRw BYTECRYPRIORTD g .- Ox .Z,„:',> ACTT/DIES.• % OE4. 18.0 _� / W-� q CONSTRUCTIONAFFICCOAG ESTABLISHED PER THE REOUREMENTS Of THE ® U ?y; 1 ( S I MINNESOTA CONTROLS OL UUF`OLRBMM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IMMUTCDIANO THE CITU THIS SHALL r • \x„%b. ^� 'N,,,,,,,' ,:K WEH6 NE4h `T. r / iJ PERMITTED SHALL AUT AREMAIN OPEN 70 OYTHECIRFFC AT ALL MES NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE F 'a 4''v.< I / ' Ian/1k�H� c/ /' / "/"."e--- SNORING FDRBu1.D EXCAVATIONMYBEU6EDATTHEpEDRETGNOFTxFCONTRACTORANpAs /�p �H F00 x. 1'.8 SF m� �//� ` .-_ APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPREBENTATTVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCOONACIWITIES. `''�'� BT`S r °�' K//I.� TAR �"`. � �%/ s. DRAGIN DAND1.ma AND CLEAN-UP AREAS REQUIRED BY M THE CITV. ERTYLMrsas SHOWN a+THE �i��>/ 575 I IXUwINCSAND IM NiuxEO NAMgNNERASREQUIRED BY TE COY. � -:.B d. RENAV ODI111,ND GE. 1 �� / ` I •i ELEV. WELL SUPERVISION AND NAT IAN A DULY ' ti , C _ IOL M �//�E-��''//_ / •'� �' �i EL[V-A9'.00 CITY OF EDINA REMOVAL NOTES: vNOER ...E OF . ` . B -'1.j\ \•._ ,-IB��/�(�l>�� N % Y I +. RESERVED FOR MN SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. f n INSI 6EIJCHLAAPh -007 •"~� \ d r. D K.t! _ 4 'ITOP NE NAIL. .Lr.� /�Rvr 'H3t _ \�� z_ IELEV-390:26.._.__ a. 1..../o.mT63 L •%'''''1,-''' '-'- ':--------'-'7'''Y"'''-- f ISSUEJSUBMITTAX UMMAR,' &ga od 1!r 4. V/t_ir71 I I RN.i><tl'a3 14 rm s,RMma1. '''''''''''''''''..,...3 �' L'�k[,r. �'<5.�r- � 2 t_INV.=Abn'r REMOVALS LEGEND: - ��tll2OC f4 WA `V .6 "\ 'H P� Y 862 EK I'rANttlUfl ELEVATION INTERVAL L 1'�x . ///// RE9AwA60FVEMDmANDALLBASE ,ERIAE ' �� MDE _ r ;y, ✓��j �'EXISTING LI i�pE. HNcwoiuc artacoNC AnIOGRAVELwwrts `��:.r,Ee a.P;c _ c r e� Fei,.:��/ . ./ ���, eD,il. .... ;_Pala Fd.N. JI�m v�Y srxucruRE Hxc1.uoINGALL s May=Dao, r ARD omwTrous. r \\ \`may i ; `\_.-Sa+-"moi `'., \ B - ur IN 0. A60A e2�eA FDonxcG -- 1 \ ,q <�/ 4R ;y�\1 14.E ,REVISIOosinmm�flv -1�V,Hl��l �.*� r v��y39c ry G V 4, tl •70 - 014 332 Ci6 I!- r TREE PBOTFnroN I2•/ A. 1- HIV/111V.=B84." `� -, CP' 7_. 0�y\_ N Bi 4k'C+V y O I1 1NK 1,` SF INV.=AF4.1 X TREE RExwvAL INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS ., Bet.asc\ REMOVALS PLAN NIONITOR WELL ,' --..do � \` GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ELEV.=88F...xS "�=� `9,p 4f-^ II \l �i\ 6mD.s.IVMZLoco ��� Be .x � C1 .Q M PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ./Y Parcel 1:(PIN:I9-0y View T Trace 3rd Addition.Hennepin Co y, I Minnesota except ally w Terrace 3 \ It IZO- Part of Lot 11,Biock I,Volleys View Terrace 3rd Addition.Neut.County, \ to xwt17.e7o7 Minnesota)described as follow:Beginning°ol apo the east line of \ / sold Lot 11.n1 distant 31.6 eet south Din thence northwesterly \ 54.6 . .which If extended woad inleruct the northwesterly ,\ .of said Lot O al hence open!ste taut rig.southwesterly8bo northa coror saki Lot 11; ner ▪ \ P voulheovl r1y upright prudes toeastlin oft Lot 11;thence northerly along \ ''I<� saki east Ins to the oln!of be9lmng° // \ l\• \ t r Port o• fclolE9,Bloc t,Valley slew Terrace 3rd Addition.Hennepin County, 1 �L \ i Hj�: Minnesota described Block tallow%Commencing al o point n the / \ 141 may, - \ • ,. I northwesterly line of Lot .distant .I et southwesterly from northerly A'( corner o said Lot 11;thence southeasterly 9.05 feet alono inn If / \ \ <: extended would intersect the east Ilse o d Lot 11 ata point distant i / \ xwr.i Nk, \\ �Q 1.4 lei south from the c,.o carve thence southwesterly at rym SCALE:1 INCH=30 FEET --,k_.',:- onglee feet to the pont of beginning:thence continuing s Mwestw1y northwesterly al '/r \ 'Y� r8¢ \\11.-- along t;thence described me ]y>plel thence ol9said Lotti / RR♦q,` 68 teal northeasterly with northwesterly line'foe yr distance of 78 feet.thence southeasterly to the point of beginning. Also/ 4 .N.' \ //.4 '— t'40. Tne exclM1erly9tOB leer el lne eastery t00 reel of Lot II,Bxk I.vo eY 1.1111111111.1.1.1\ ` \�'�I�-� r 41� Yew Terrace.Addition.Hennepin County.Minus.. ', / `•�C, rys v✓ "4azx f _ Se Pr< 10-13213-24-34-000)Volley Tea Hennepin rl p,�/- www10_,...7,77.,teb F y Purl of Lo1P11�,Bock IYwxTTerrace 3rd Addition.H in CounlY. 1 / \ i',4-,,_,,' �--esu-- 48 46.° ry _ 1� Port of L t It Block follows:ieq Drug" REVISIONS \ L b Qr� "fT' '} \ ,+ ? `ByO =`b, ° 4 q P9 . -wT' • Lal 11 distant 31.4°feet south point °rve(thence ngelpwleeledy Dole. \ 44/ 1 jj,,1, •' 1---- 1114- ___� ? 9ry1, .••;'1`� One of• feetsad Lott 11 of a point g a line which f3B le lee,onded ulhwusterly from northeld Intersect Me rly corner h /up I (j / Y(1I •�7'. a h` # Lot ,thence southwesterly at right an T feet thence \ ®ex ♦ southeasterly of right angles to east m° I Lot thence northerly dung S / "v4" °� .� :3!---•:3P 4 sod frost line to the point of beginning. \ I. I �i / u pvper / I %o ` 4 I e to-eMT-.7 Parcel] (1g 028 21 34-009]) Axl nl J` <- // r i \ 1 i wF Port of Lot 11.Bbck I.Volley Yew Terrace 3rd Addition.Hennepin County. / B1 ars st„r 1 Minnesota duel-bed follows: g 1 a point y'(•)>, A., • 4%Y northwesterly line of Lot 11.distant 38 t souMweelolrin Irom noline rtherly ��` r �\ /e ���Iy.�// •w,ePo r-s,�yr w se --aid _ \'�/!{,� \ corner of extended would ouldLfromIntersect the Iot 11;thence t ot heasterly 57.05 111 al o pont tlklonl \ r /•/ F� 1// �. 'a't":w.°"ty=.vp 'i Sze\ {, 'S�j .. point r" thencecontinuing al ran ♦ // "xwr,e;° err �{ Net 10Point a t c. mang southwesterly !s, i`d�� fL !C Dong lost described line 7307 feel thence northeasterly a1 right angles 'a( \""' �\ ` / - �M1OS poor •esass / '� ^ `) 68dleilcethence780 et,thence southeasterly earth y to the pont of begof kmnq nerenY certify that this s an o .'� ` a I al distance n ou eaa r o h // n'^.-) r� `� /�j -S/ ;O/ 6 _�`J �� t I jl i Swinercr(�ddi Hennepineasterly 1w NNI of Lal 11 &a<k I.va er Nw Re epi s as pr parion d by mi or neer my / ulx� l� `qy \4g� `s-� /�/.. ,�,'�J L� °mace 3rd A on. County.Minnesota. oitn Registered dna sar.eraa <r me s ;M/ .� }F n /�i�f//: /•_ .app �' a Minnesota p I \ a '-.L 4p M"a m°mode—iloaar L __—_ ,_.pt ` , 1_I ""'(.�\rY a f`rJ �4 I�!E�J 4 ' `` Minnesota Reg.No.23677 '���♦ � _ \�< _°° `\ _ r.w. .' + -�'r. Y - 01,9X' gale:_—__—`__—_ �I Gf/ ..:, w ` � !y F J " id Lne xv.ora ```\\Z4•``t„I�1 ��•y r' \` 1` \\_"'e�\. .d`1�� C C] BOUNDARY • 4LZ.4e, -+l s ``cgs \.T C] AND „ g` i / ▪ . `,��' ,,,,/'t� 4 psp, .. ( /+60 C) TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY rnn...c xa.\-Bte� t�v/�`4`�$�� -- f,°t/fr. //, 4 \s ;'.11 ,I\ s/�°iM, / \I/ FOP: `\`\ 4 `�N 11 °aY a��,�,1.\;'�� _/ �'�,F Lc\� 1, °d 4 111 B `•�•`_'aEY.em.m CIVIL SITE NI /O ” - �w , s . .r�°Tan Mu em \ 1 L r!, �� -.\_ g`t'''s ,,n f•ai_.,----,, ---- °°�L '--1-;:*-�tr ncv0ewoxe egueex 'It • ` I L IL v �-1 ♦ '�1, ♦ sal Hp.-ee.> • LEGEND her owe? I L_L _.► 1 "r ;-5'" .� ,\ +P I.. SITE: c rotas ( •� Cr `\ �titr \,,,t,„ G ,r i w �' -f _ { cu,b 450004506 VALLEY VIEW ROAD �. e -,V4-Et.o _ d Electric I \ / -eel ..-77---S.'x rIa —.—_ yY r L;/rii, r. \\\\\ N R?:pgy.''. ' sra '4'4 s�P ..--------------- ________ owns'll=re ET/INA,MINNESOTA ^k'(_ \ ' �iO'• $ .Ac'iO t5 a ixr•eex.l --_ ere 1,\ ♦ J storm lAel o GENERAL NOTES: \ • o,,,,,,,4,,,..,` °?'�s I t_\\ o® atria HENNEPIN COUNTY r in.ew .. n.wn.e \ : v ''o y. \ o emicP e 4` _, I v , d Power nt ala" .5.-o"":un"'°,'o'",°s:"pw°Lon°I:.cp1w:xe:sr:re ollE ceyu°:1(sni�"'°• lL1w-nines \\Y .,.re.� o OM 1.111111 Mks°ate oxH "Ab°3" a'.�el"«"xa: ee 1x - ®/ 'm catchbasin "we r o r. r e s alv p -L SII 4 `Fy`�.x' �iq'1 Deciduous Air condition. (ala.in MI HARRY S.JOHNSON CO..INC. z::-.:-:1:::11,-..,,::,....02..x.,..„w =-L L'_d/„+,F m.� 5anleraas Tree roe.5'1.1 LAND SURVEYORS nbn sum,mos mod.pn Ms pound I.a ;. a Light P. 9063 Lyndale Avenue South .du r t nrk .ne en.,,-o5---.•• 5• s ® phone manhole Son Bloomington,MN.95437 m.pm Teas o carom e. b Tele.952-884-5341 Fax 952-084-5344 7emti IaIxaAeSnoaw. a px[t1 x 851.775 foisting Spat El GAUL xwwMjsueyeecam neevleo.zew 4Exn h Spat Devotion 60 IS 0 30 60 00 1-3-90281 SCALE IN FEET x - 1OiY'" 2016309 CT w-r r. 1 OF 1 I I I • • shea ------- - - __ T.O.RTU 0. EN 0 II 13 0 SCR9._E6. 0 -II T.O.WALL :vswnup.n su.n ...__ - - . _ --it '\=II _-.-� 114 0 ��emds.nms5uoz 0 II Tr-, - - -_ fl i sit 1. 257 as: I II II �,� T.O.ADDITION.ti ST LOUIS PAK MSS. 0 0 r>-��"" ""....: °e.RZ: V ___-..-=_r_�__ _ \._ - _ LEVE--_L_ty - -_--- _� 1W._U� . .,.:VM NA LSTATION 0 19 roGOVA WIETVROAN EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION EowA.MN 55424 A101 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" _. ----- -- TO.RTU SCRE�EN�y 5 0 - . -. -0 -114-6'V E "I"'4111 T.O,tWALL ��I��. lCo� Co� �l Clnn n 0 / , a.$ STATION - - .t '-'.' YYOIIIIII - 1 II '1 - I 1111111111111111 1111111....E " E "�.p. - • MI.MMI ILLI• __— awasoo¢vccacn to •n� 0 0 0 Q I® 1�`�-$ • 3 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A101 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" ''..... - - - 13 _ T.O.RTU SCREEN 0 R R 0 119.9' 6' F.; a a FE)) Ir 0 n.D.0-..0.—A,...o7»AJ II 011 / T.O.WALOL''y QII 2 I on 'ik ��� iE� Q222511551555 100 WASHINGTON AVENUE 1.-" 2, ...11 _. _ `IIMINStii ii p±.7., _ h EAPo 55454 6 MN ion 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 © 0 1_,E,7_:_.°4 y Lo O EXTERIOR KEY NOTES Keynote Revision'... Number Descrilplion Tracking'.. 2 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1 EXISTING PORCELAIN PANEL REMOVE PAINT TO EXPOSE EXISTING PORCELAIN Alm SCALE: 1/B"=1'-O" SURFACE BELOW.REFURBISHED AS NEEDED TO AS-NEW CONDITION '.. 2 EXISTING EYEBROW.REFURBISH TO'AS NEW CONDITION.REPLACE CAMPING '... BEHIND FRONT PANEL 3 EXISTING BRICK.PAINT DARK GRAY 4 NEW DOOR AND SIDELIGHT 5 NEW WINDOW _ ®_ _ TO.RTU SCREEN 6 NEW COOLER BOX ADDITION 7 MODIFY EXISTING CURTAINWALL SO THAT THIS PANEL IS OPERABLE AS A TO-G0 - 16 - 11 WALKUP WINDOW ZONING SUBMITTAL 0 20160721 E QT.O.WALL 8 REPLACE EXISTING OVERHEAD DOOR WITH NEW INSULATED GLASS OVERHEAD / 114.0%17 DOOR.REUSE EXISTING TRACKS IF POSSIBLE.REPLACE IF REQUIRED. -� 9 NEW BRICK WALL INFILL TO MATCH EXISTING,PAINT DARK GRAY _ 0 0 0 10 NEW BRICK ADDITION TO MATCH EXISTING BRICK.PAINT DARK GRAY ;� 11 EXISTING CMU TO REMAIN,PAINT DARK GRAY ai I ISI II II If IC JC- Ir `� 0 12 NEW DOOR - \ _ _ X I , 13 NEW CORRUGATED METAL RTU SCREEN WALL PETERSEN PAC-CLAD,72 PANEL • A -0 CHARCOAL GRAY �A 11 = _ �1 _ \ 0 14 NEW CANOPY FRAME WITH RETRACTABLE FABRIC CANOPY ROOF i _ 15 NEW W000 PLANK PLANTER BOX PATIO EDGE _ L� J _ /;_-_ 16 NEW SIGNAGE _ I� ___ 1Z EXISTING DOOR TO REMAINms 0 18 NEW SIE FOLDING OPERABLE 100'LO' 19 'FIRE RISER ROOM TEXT ON DOOR DLETTERS.WHITE I A ELLpN$ 4 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION Alm SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0 -_ - A101..._ I a . in - di'---- * 4 :7---:'-=- J �' '} '., y' :7:-;.:,-........_ v ..a-- ,.,0 ' ::, 0 "` CD Z .:11. I � ,- m J i. s . Q J uq t U = . •t: .� iI r ,oil. /�; Q _o`,�: ' 1. - '' -pa,1 x __ Vi _ _._ ..r.� xy... fro , f ;::, d .rte £3 trtry• � , '• 1�{ t {w' lc.- • r :,../:4:'/-1";ii-risc,-.;'?.. ;'''f:':41''.4`.'' t . ,i.,-,!.1. ii u�`' r} ti::,''llit'''''.1;: , 1,,' if4 ` ,1� ,,,,..,..:,,,, ,', ' It..:1:1. i..,,::: :.:,,,,.;,i.,:.;:;.,-l',.-i--':''..;'";.;'',...' :1: 11:-..''1 r 4:::i''.1 -,':•::::' • .7.e;--7.:':;:.::'.!- t -r ,ti t s � °.:',�Y4J::: -.j a� j :4::1 rj:i fir-.. - w� :.41t:''lit' :,,.':i3:- v..,s," :.: ,::::'::-''-'i':'''1-:'j.•''...'';',.':.' :;..':::.-':-.::: 1:'"',''1:: ::'''• ..,: ,:' :,.., ..'4!.:' ,.:.1 vpR ; 1y# i •( : ,.., N , .,,..„.e. ..1, .. , ... ....., . . , .Li-kr,,-..-.7- '-'4 ....--:,.. . -- I : 1._,':,:,:,,,,..,,.:::i.,,,:: i. .. Qir • -r4£ww_ a r t - 4 _ I .. - - v,mat s TOWN HALL STATION BUILDING MATERIALS EXISTING BRICK TO BE PAINTED CHARCOAL GRAY EXISTING PORCELAIN PANELS TO REMAIN ABOVE BRICK. L-� PAINT WILL BE REMOVED TO REVEAL EXISTING ORIGINAL WHITE AND RED PORCELAIN. RED 'EYEBROW' PROJECTING FROM SURFACE TO BE RESTORED 11 Exterior Rendering Town Hall Station Shea Restaurant&Bar 1 Edina MN •m F .. ;J�:,.....:::..:.....,,..::,,,,,,,,,,,:,:::,,,,,,,,,,,, ,.,i,. . . 1t.-;; • wTOWN HALLjT • *q4t +� rS ? ..--"•. - 'h'''.' r- t.� � L/ 'so.' -r ''.:,#1,-_.-:. FULL SERVICE \t 1� 11 �,.. .,,., I SAMEPRICE J` ro`;`y r I I, l I � F �� !� , j i • ...r. .-. ., C _ r ,b w .f ^ Exterior Rendering Town Hall Station Restaurant&Bar 1 Edina MN v f4 un g .. 1 4r ; }r"r• 'w -:• ' .1',:'.1.,..„,..t:A.7.. ,rri-7,7-.);!.. .' •ti - Q �j .i � � _ • �► � A. �C _ "M1—; E Via, � 'n,:''''''' Li- ' -faro ,...,,,e. , ...„.. 2 _.1__ i , ,. x y^ 71); \\\1.71Y-' \\.\ orf �.. `� �; � ..i.. ' P'X'.�� --,:.,.�, ..-.tee �- � 0 .-7. ,,,,, , �� • w.*'�'} d I� ���(.�, ��� meg, ...may" . �: - i 7 � re.7;,,,,,.4.:, 117-tH > 1:7. I , iiii,.. ;V� , . . b. :1 ,;.1„..,, ., nY t1 L". 6 _ • ,,, 1 ` t.. ar �°r"� -- i1111.21 ,. I ..,. .. . . • ..„ ..x.,-.,, '', -. ' :. , e l , al Yc 1121 ,..4<,..11.„ r !�,„;-, , ,[1.,;,-.,.1.4L �.Y�1,�..Y '5' • .,* „:14.1--, '.'`i- Yi ' ,yi ` 'kCIW .ate ` vu � .::rHt t". nwn • Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines (n� A. Building Height Limits Plan sE• The building height limits for the Neighborhood Node are indicated in Figure 4.3. Woodd.l.v.II.y Vim Generally: Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines • Height Limits Near the Center of the Neighborhood Node. North of Valley View Road,building heights may be up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet. South of Valley View Road building heights may be up to four stories, not to exceed 48 feet. • Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful transitions to single family areas are important(as specified on the Building Height Limits Plan), the height of new buildings may be up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet. Figure 4.3 Building Height Limits Plan, on the following page, defines height limits throughout the Neighborhood Node. Figure 4.3b, also on the following page, depicts existing height limits so that comparison can be made between current policy and what is proposed. 34 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan A3 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Similar to the Neighborhood Commercial category, Neighborhood Node: • Supports Neighborhood Serving Businesses. Encourages small-to moderate-scale businesses that serve primarily the adjacent neighborhoods. Primary land uses should be retail and services, offices, studios, and institutional uses. In addition, designation as Neighborhood Node provides: • Predictability for Current Landowners. Supports current owners' efforts to invest in improvements their properties by providing a predictable planning framework for the area. • Flexibility for Redevelopment. Provides greater flexibility to the development market by more explicitly encouraging the inclusion of needed housing. • New Gathering Space/Placemaking. Encourages intentional integration of landscaped open space and new formal public spaces. • Protection of Community Values such as Scale,Walkability and Character. A set of Development Guidelines protects the scale, walkability and character of the existing area by regulating the relationship of buildings-to-streets and the transition of building heights from node-to-neighborhood. Table 4A-Neighborhood Node Land Use Category(Also see Figure 4.2.) Land Use Category General Description Development Guidelines Density Guidelines NN In general,small-to Building footprints generally less Maximum residential Neighborhood Node moderate-scale than 20,000 square feet(or less for density up to 30 dwelling commercial, individual storefronts). units per acre(du/acre). residential or mixedparking is less prominent than (Densities are further use buildings serving pedestrian features. constrained by the primarily the adjacent parameters of the neighborhood(s). Encourage structured parking and Building Height Limits open space linkages where feasible; Plan*). Primary uses emphasize enhancement of the ) encouraged are pedestrian environment. neighborhood-serving Maximum Floor Area retail and services, Encourage development to comply with the Wooddale Valley View Ratio(FAR)per zoning offices,studios, code. institutional and Neighborhood Node Development residential. Guidelines*: A. Building Height Limits Plan B. Building Frontage Guidelines C. Gathering Space Guidelines D. Site-Specific Guidelines E. General Guidelines * The Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines are found on the following pages. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page I 33 A-31— Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Preferred Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Node (NN) This plan introduces Neighborhood Node(NN)as a new land use category specifically for use within a portion of the Wooddale Valley View Study Area. Also see description and Table 4A. At shown,at Wooddale Valley View it replaces the previous Neighborhood Commercial (NC) designation that was established within this area in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. -, 1 LfilI LDR I �' I r OSP 1 1 a ', (Pamela Park) LD LDR~4.. 1 r 4 /�.., W.6, st ' --I-1-71 � I �1 1 Study 1 RIS t _ I ■R - P.,1 Area , i1 or , !* I Y a LDR` Y I !G 1 F � r n F `o ... \` - I ffi __ o R V J L i ;I I' C-rtiiiie" Ir I r Neighborhoed �• ': - �� - I "_. 1r `Carmnerctal +; � Iof 6rundary —— .62nd,�*e ,-, PSP \, W. 6- rid New Boundary of® )DAF -1 Neighborhood Node k''i r I �H DR LIAR LiR I a € iA f� LOR M 1 ■ IN M t t LDR 1 Garrison Lane � •� I I at rirR r LbaR i N N Neighborhood Node(NN). High Density Residential(HDR). It is recommended that the apartment building located at the southwest corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, currently planned HDR,be included in the Neighborhood Node classification on the Preferred Land Use Plan, as shown above. LDR Low Density Residential(LDR) Low Density Attached Residential (LDAR) LDA Open Space and Parks(OSP) Public/Semi-Public(PSP) No changes are recommended to these Land Use Plan classifications from the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. They PSP are all located outside the boundary of the Study Area. Figure 4.2 Preferred Land Use Plan I 32 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan 1433 Chapter 4 - Land Use anCommunity Design Policies for Land Use and Community Design 1. The City will introduce the Neighborhood Node (NN)* Future Land Use Plan designation, as presented in this plan. The City will adopt this plan as an amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and amend zoning and related ordinances to align with this plan. 2. The City will review development applications of all future projects (within the boundaries of the Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node)to ensure compliance with the Neighborlhood Node Development Guidelines*. The guidelines include: A. Building Height Limits Plan B. Building Frontage Guidelines C. Gathering Space Guidelines D. Site-Specific Guidelines E. General Guidelines(for the Entire Neighborhood Node) *The Neighborhood Node (NN) boundaries, its description, and the Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines are presented in the following pages. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page I 31 Iia Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 4.3 Goals and Policies The following is a policy framework that provides guidance to the public sector for future decision making, staff review of development applications, municipal plan implementation and community based initiatives. The following takes into account the opinions and values of stakeholders,the parameters of previous planning and existing policies. The Study Area will continue to evolve and become a mixture of housing and commercial development guided by the demands of the market, property owners' decisions, the policies and guidelines of this plan, and the Edina Comprehensive Plan. Though the proportion of the Study Area devoted to housing will likely be greater than it was in 2014, the exact pattern of land use over time will be determined by market forces. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change. Land Use and Community Design Goals 1. Activation of the Core. Concentrate activity and neighborhood-serving commercial businesses near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Any new buildings introduced at the four corners of the Wooddale Valley View intersection should include street-level retail or gathering spaces that interact with the sidewalk and encourage pedestrian activity. 2. Building-to-Street Relationships. Ensure that ground-level frontages throughout the node are carefully designed with public-to-private relationships that encourage beauty, safety, informal interaction, walkability and a sense of place. 3. Graceful Transitions. Encourage the scale of buildings to transition from center to edge of the Neighborhood Node,with the largest buildings located near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, decreasing in scale toward the surrounding single-family neighborhood. Ensure that redevelopment near single family homes is designed sensitively. 4. Flexible Evolution of Land Uses. Allow existing land uses to evolve in response to the market. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change: The commercial site north of Valley View Road and Oaklawn Avenue may evolve to housing. The Edina Village Market may redevelop as a mix of housing and commercial. The sites east of Kellogg Avenue immediately north of Valley View Road may evolve as either commercial or residential. 5. Drive-Through Formats. Discourage buildings with drive-through elements such as gasoline stations and those with drive-up windows. They are inconsistent with the guiding principles of this plan. 30 1 P a b e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan A3l Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 4.2 Trends and Challenges Community input, real estate market conditions and existing physical conditions are all drivers of the principles,goals and policies of this plan. The community engagement process and results were outlined in Chapter 1 Introduction. Real estate market conditions and future trends are presented in detail in Chapter 2 Demographic and Market Profile and Chapter 3 Economic Vitality. Below is a review of physical conditions that also factor into land use and community design decision making in the Study Area: Aging Buildings. Most of the buildings in the Study Area are older and some have not been as well maintained as perhaps they would have been under better market conditions. The commercial buildings were created during an era when the business environment and the traffic patterns were much different than they are today. Buildings Set Back with Surface Parking. Many of the commercial buildings are set back behind a parking area, separating shopfronts from the street. This can reduce convenience for those arriving on foot, by bike or by transit, and creating a less attractive and comfortable streetscape experience for pedestrians. Moving buildings too far back (especially when cars are parked in front) can reduce the positive effects of spatial enclosure, expose customers to elements and discourage the casual strolling often found in successful retail environments and popular gathering places. Lack of Streetscape Investments. The appearance of the Study Area is diminished by the lack of trees and green boulevards along the edges of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Traffic Patterns. There is quite a bit of traffic through the Study Area but much of it consists of pass-through trips, especially at peak hours. When the intersection of Valley View Road and Highway 100 was closed, access to businesses in the Study Area from west of the highway and other locations was greatly diminished. In addition, Wooddale Avenue does not intersect or cross Highway 62 south of the Study Area. Scale and Shape of Parcels. The Study Area contains a range of unique parcels, many with smaller sizes with irregular shapes. While this contributes to the node's unique character,these conditions present site design challenges for redevelopment projects. Relationship to Neighborhoods. The adjacent neighborhoods consist mostly of single-family detached housing in good condition. There is little separation, buffering or transition from the buildings of the Study Area to that housing. Providing a proper transition from more active areas nto the neighborhood may present challenges. Terrain. South of the Study Area, the land slopes steeply down to ponds. This creates accessibility and parking issues that make these sites less amenable to commercial uses, especially retail. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page I 29 A30 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 4.1 Current Conditions The 2014 pattern of land use in the Study Area is summarized by Figure 4.1 and the related table. A detailed description of land use, buildings, major tenants and property owners is presented in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV. sf �+F .2. ` .z # W. 1 st A `. " ru q 1� Itai ---------__:: . . 19,A.:, fri;4- - 1 . " ' • ' w 6 2nd ,ire _ 44‘ 11 �1. q 1 a.. - l it!qt, Building Type Year Built Current Land Use(at end of 2014) 1 1954 Retail and service—former gasoline service station;presently unused 2 1956 Mixed use: small offices over clothing retailer and ice cream shop 3 1957 Service business-dry cleaning 4 1957 Retail and service-strip mall(Edina Village Market(EVM)) 5 1959 Retail and service-addition to strip mall(EVM) 6 1959 Service business-salon 7 1960 _Residential—apartment building with underground parking 8 1960* Small offices(ValleyWood) 9 1962 Residential—apartment building with underground parking 10 1963 Residential—apartment building with underground parking 11 1969 Residential—apartment building with underground parking 12 1969 Office—professional service business(*recently updated) 13 1970 Service business—child day care 14 no bldg Undeveloped site—owned by the City =Two Story Vertical Mixed Commercial-Office over Retail/Services =One Story Commercial =Multi-family Residential-Duplex/Apartments/Flats Figure 4.1 Pattern of Land Existing Properties:Building Types,Year Built and Current Land Uses in 2014 28 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan 4011 Land Use and Community Design. r� Current Conditions Trends and Challenges Goals and Policies Implementation Steps • i . • 27 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design !` M ;.. IBIP ^" TransitionV _ . I ill _or EO'Drc Q fi, f. , 4 41F ®i i` �, 4 . r t o k W. 6`t 5t °D 1 �Tr�ansitionlipr iQ�� ���� V to O r t .- {36'Deep) : N ,<: �. �- . r—c. N i �. CEi , orY I. 11 r4116 y transition` ., r N ,. :gii.,„.41' (36'Deep Ft fO I 77....,>:\�. I o.t ° f 1 � . D iti 1 1 Ib a Jy 4 , a //Ptt 1'® . z nd e W W. 6 z nd I Neighborhood Node r `: Boundary i`� , � � 14-1 4. s.H�+. .1 r ; Iim Garrison Lane 111 II11411f • Four Story Limit. Figure 4.3 Building Height 4 Up to four stories,not to exceed 48 feet 1 Limits Plan Three Story Limit. Si sr w 3 Up to three stories,not to exceed 36 feet g 1 Two Story Limit. ., Up to two stories,not to exceed 24 feet k' Two Story Transition(36'Deep)* Height Limit: Up to two stories,not to �� exceed 24 feet(vertically)within the `^<e specified 36 feet in horizontal distance from property line. N �' Two Story Transition(6o'Deep)* IIII HOD-2 Vati :aa=ms27eut :Tilt-� Height limit: Up to two stories,not to - HOD-3 8u8dmg he;8ht�aatl be determined by,egwred setbacks. exceed 24 feet(vertically)within the but sdulln�exceed3scr es or 38 feet wh Gever Bless. specified 6o feet in horizontal distance [,t M HOD-4 BuAartp beight stta8 be determ¢,edbyrequiredsetlaadu, F,:�t''' but shat)not exceed 4 stories or 48leei wh,t ee r is less. from property line. *(These'Transition'designations were created Figure 4.3-b to establish a graceful transition from Existing Building Height Limits as Defined by Neighborhood Node properties with three story Building Height Overlay District (Source: Article Xl, limits to immediately adjacent residential areas Division 2,Building Height Overlay District,and outside the node.) Appendix A of the Official Zoning Map.) Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page I 35 A34 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design f B. Building Frontage Guidelines ( 1'' The location of a range of climatically-appropriate frontage types is depicted by wooaaai•wn.rFigure 4.4 and Figure 4.5. These guidelines do not address style or building Neighborhood Node Development vernacular but will ensure streets that are lined with ground level features that Guidelines contribute to active, safe and walkable streets. Generally: • Building-to-Street Relationships. Figure 4.4 Building Frontages F1-F6 illustrates typical configurations of building to street (private-to-public) relationships and describes their varying appropriate context. These `Frontage Types' shown are based on successful historic precedents found in many older multi-modal neighborhoods of Edina, including the Wooddale Valley View Study Area, and throughout the Twin Cities and the Midwest. • Node-to-Neighborhood Transitions. The frontage types are keyed to their appropriate neighborhood context within the Neighborhood Node in Figure 4.5 Context Areas. The purpose of the map is to guide new development toward ground level building design that maintains visually graceful and walkable transitions from the more active areas to the quieter single-family residential neighborhood streets. Figures 4.4 and 4.5 on the following pages present the Building Frontage Guidelines of Wooddale Valley View's Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines. 36 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan It37 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design • 1 Storefront . Appropriate Context:This frontage type is for small retail or ., service spaces fronting public spaces in Core areas, r w i Configuration:There may be an exterior entrance for each Ileasable space,spaced relatively closely along the sidewalk. ...%la ?9 a=f Follow City of Edina guidelines for commercial storefronts for I r Ii'-i r —' glazing,setbacks,awnings,signage,lighting and for related w - ! •...1.___, outdoor commercial uses such as sidewalk cafes. Doorway (At-Grade).. i F2 ' � � Appropriate Context: This frontage type is for smaller commercial spaces in commercial or mixed use buildings that - Lai_-, 1 front a sidewalk.This is riot to be used as a substitute for . Storefront,where Storefront is merited or preferred,in core areas.The Doorway has less window space because the F i _ /--- interior use might be office rather than retail. -r,1l1 7: __ L t—. Configuration: The at-grade doorway may serve one or _ '" multiple inferior users. If set back 6'-12',a'door-court' ` provides space for bike parking,seating and greenery. 1 Stoop ! IAppropriate Context This frontage type is primarily for single r '' r family row houses and multifamily buildings with units facing • t°. r , I the street.They provide a good transitional frontage condition ` x' ..of r for buildings in between neighborhood and core areas. `.' -• ,* .y. r Configuration: Exterior stairs access a sheltered or recessed f .G ;>_. r.11 i f Sr,, • �.�. . ILrr,, area large enough for a family to stand and wait for the door to ` 1 t� r 'f--`"`-' be unlocked,and for guests to stand back after ringing the doorbell.Stairs facing the street provide a social setting. -.,..,; "F..,,. -,_ LI Shared Entry 1 r F4tib Appropriate Context:This frontage type is for apartment + �-6 buildings.This residential frontage may be also used in a 1 , 1}' ^-r _ 'I I vertically mixed-use building that also features Storefront :, - F . { frontage. 11 e would a single entrance to ! .' ,e , Oi:V;11j , Configuration:`dfigg with securityy featureseIndiv dual apartmentswould1. `'1 I I I I I have entry doors along central hallways. Buildings with this ,^-,,,'. condition may also feature the Stoop frontage for first-floor — _y. s - units having direct access to the sidewalk. Porch & Yard K4. r------ J Appropriate Context:this frontage is typically for residential ,. ' 's, ^ v r . -` - - applications but can be found on commercial buildings, """''' � r s= I especially in transitional areas between single family streets - {il� lli l���I� and more commercial blocks. ' a i rt�a it - Configuration:7.5'clear zone allows porch to become .� I� ��,,_I }, r: furnishable living space Accessible entries should be accessed !r►a.1 'X ,` —_ 't from the front to the side of central stair,which should be _.I i. t - visible from the street. '41 "'''' t'•.'- r tr �,,fn ;S. K.:s • F6 Common Lawn .,. e I. I Appropriate Context: Common Lawn describes ,e t....*:.-- 1 }I• _ the predominant primary frontage condition r � ' found throughout Edina Is residential - Ill sy ` Ineighborhood streets. ' ' i .,'.. Configuration:See City of Edina's current � I•�j ' C regulations governing setbacks and lot,yard and '$ 1-. 4._..L.. : building placement of single family homes. '"_ Figure 4.4 Building Frontages F1-F6 High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page I 37 A34 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 i t i i ! i i i i • IN a ! A isI . i t I i -i i i t • 1 I ilk• J izi !� •• • ! i ! ti 1 It 11 I\ ,.. , iii I� ■ !—i III NIP i 111 ii ■ •-•...Mk . w. 61 St ; • • ,,,i 1 II ii,i I I I MI ! -...s.......... N. r'. .�.� _,... li i i al • 'J! I ■ P '3 1 111 Iill ._.. HI llf gi.ian i ■ :' t ' ,, � III .1 ! i ' ,, 1• � 1 •-q„�••r •...N i I lull• I CO ' Er i - i i ..i i ! ■ji 1 ! I NN I Lt 4. t. i It EN i i 1111111N - -•-.,i i• Neighborhood Node! - _ _ WI 62 nd - • ii j ! Boundary i i •,,., : I i iii 1 j I ,•, ...MI t t IMil 1111 1 ' f ` 11111 �t e k -� � 6arrison_•Lane_ III. 11. i 1 .........1i MI i imi, - i i j i -. Preferred Frontages by Context Area Node Transitional Neighborhood ■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Storefront Fl ■■■■■■■■■■■■e discouraged not permitted ■■■■■■■■■■■IIN ■■■■■■■■■■■■® Doorway F2 ::::::::::In not permitted ■■■■■■■■■■■■u Stoop F3 ■■■■■■■■■■■■: discouraged II▪MIIMIIMIIIMI1111111111,`'..- \;::;,,,'4-„,,'',.Z.,.:;Z-,:' mumm mmos Shared EntryF4 Immun omium 4 ■■■■■■■■■■■■ discouraged Porch F5 discouraged v'> , s, Common Lawn F6 not permitted discouraged Storefronts (F1) • • • • Strongly Encouraged Figure 4.5 Building Frontage Guidelines: Context Areas 38 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan /r311 w91 �r,1, 1p" " �711cn , v2, R Jo ,3�' DATE: September 6, 2016 TO: 4500 Valley View Rd Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague— Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner P.E. - Director of Engineering RE: 4500 Valley View Rd — Site Plan Review The Engineering Department has reviewed site development plans dates 7/15/2016, and survey dated 6/29/2016. Survey I. No comments Living Streets 2. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. 3. Design sidewalk along Wooddale Avenue between northern two driveways to be within 10-15-ft of the back of curb. 4. Add pedestrian crosswalk pavement markings across north leg of Wooddale Avenue and west leg of Valley View Road. Traffic and Street 5. Clearly denote private paths or private sidewalk. Maintenance for private sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. 6. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Sanitary and Water Utilities 7. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 8. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 9. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit. Wet tap to occur at night if two way traffic cannot be maintained. City staff to be present to inspect, cost to be paid by developer. Separate meters for fire and domestic services will be required. 10. A SAC and WAC determination will be required and Met Council and City fees will be calculated from the determination. Storm Water Utility I I. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report, if required by watershed district. 12. Evidence of watershed district permit is required for building permit. Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 13. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinalviN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 �113A.,j 4E7OJ 14. Site is associated with prior soil cleanup. http://cf.pca.state.mn.us/wimn/sitelnfo.cfm?siteid=43462 15. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site permit is required. Sustainability 16. When building the external trash enclosure/screen, consider making enough room for an organics bin along with the trash and recycling. Organics is an underutilized resource and is wasted when mixed with other trash. Businesses communities are finding separating organic waste, reduces their greenhouse gas emissions and their waste management expenses. 17. Consider contacting Xcel Energy for Energy Design Assistance. This Xcel conservation program provides design assistance and generous rebate-funding. The creation and commissioning of new buildings, lighting, and heating and cooling systems are the best time to reduce future energy costs. Other Agency Coordination 18. Nine Mile Creek or Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit is required depending on drainage direction. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits are required. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinalvMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 ,1'4L --J CI C Li T-E TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY .s,r rr ....:Ls-', .r•711r' :r" q-'2-2-4-:. -- - s„ •- --=MELODY LAKE '=-. - - �' ' ir• ror �o.,r� .. .. la eFa-r• i ;QMIn sa. ii laf;i 3*a. " si ` - - - CHOWEN-PARK - . _ - , . , .,. - -r PAMELA PARK g 3 CONCORDS - -- ' S7RACHAUER BIRCHCREST - .I PAI2_K _ :-*V: ', ''fiV 41 o E-oira - = - ti , ' ; T- y FLai�niew'�} -. Y fiI _ W661h S7 - I,,, '-I"'� e S r. l 7 1 =Er =pig_ _.. - -- +F' l'. ' . R 4 Soda ICY T-_-`l, 2 . i ' Traffic ImpacJ 1tud Valley View & Wooddale Rezoning Edina, Minnesota I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: _ cc '��� Bryant J.F' — icek,P.E.,P.T.O.E. License No.42802 Date: September 9,2016 [L? Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting i Traffic Impact Study Executive Summary Background: A proposal to rezone the lot at the northwest corner of Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue in Edina, Minnesota into PCD-1 would allow for to construction of a new proposed restaurant. The purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed rezoning and redevelopment of the vacant gas station into a restaurant will have any traffic or parking impacts. Results: The following conclusions were drawn from the information and analysis contained in this study: • When fully occupied, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 390 daily trips, including approximately 10 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 30 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour. • With existing volumes, the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection operates at LOS E in the p.m. peak hour and is forecast to operate at LOS F in the 2018 p.m. peak hour. • The Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection does not meet signal warrants with existing or 2018 traffic volumes. • With the forecast 2018 traffic volumes including the traffic generated by the proposed development, the site access intersections are expected to operate acceptably during the peak periods. • A parking variance will be required as the proposed 22 parking spaces to be provided on site falls short of the minimum 37 parking spaces required. • Forecast parking demand for the restaurant and fully occupied shopping center are less than the proposed amount of parking on site. • A sufficient amount of parking spaces is available in the adjacent parking lot to accommodate overflow parking from the proposed restaurant. • At least three bicycle parking spaces will be needed to meet requirements. Recommendations: No improvement to the study intersections are needed solely due to expected traffic associated with this development. However, the intersection should be monitored to determine if and when a traffic signal is justified, which would improve westbound operations during the p.m. peak hour. The removal of two of the existing accesses as part of this development will improve safety in the area surrounding Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue. Given the availability of parking spaces in the adjacent lot along with the forecast parking demand being lower than the proposed need, a parking variance from the City of Edina is appropriate and recommended to be granted. Depending upon the exact change in parking configuration, eight, 16, or potentially more parking spaces could be added on site with a re- stripping of the existing shopping center parking lot. It is also recommended that more than three bicycle parking spaces be provided to encourage bicycle travel. To further encourage non-vehicular access to the site, it is also recommended that crosswalks be included on the southbound and eastbound approaches at the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection. Sidewalks and/or marked crossing areas along the building leading to the main entrance, and also between the proposed building and the adjacent shopping center, are recommended as well. 1 Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting ii Traffic Impact Study TM=3LE OF CONTENITS Ex-cutive Summary 2. Prraposed Development.,,...,,...o.,,.,,, ..,o,.,.o..............o.....02 3. Analysis of Existing Conditions ..,.., o,00 � 4. Projected Traffic ...................... .,,.,.,....,...,...,,,,......,0 5. Analysis of Future Conditions . „o.................o.,,..., � 6. C ncllusions and Recommendations .....................................13 7. Appendix ..o., o,......o..,o...,oo.,,,.,.,,,.,o,..,o...............14 UST OF TABLES Table 1 — Existing Peak Hour Level of Service Results 4 Table 2 — Expected Site Trip Generation based on Local Data 5 Table 3 — 2018 Peak Hour Level of Service Results 5 Table 4 — Expected Restaurant Parking Demand' 10 Table 5 — Expected Shopping Center Parking Demand' 10 Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 1 Traffic Impact Study 1. Introduction At the northwest corner of Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue in Edina, Minnesota there is currently a vacant gas station on a lot zoned Planned Commercial District (PCD) 4. The PCD-4 zoning designation only allows for a carwash, gas station or automobile service center to be built. There is a proposal to rezone that lot into PCD-1 which would allow for to construction of a new proposed restaurant. The purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed rezoning and redevelopment of the vacant gas station into a restaurant will have any traffic or parking impacts. The objectives of this study are to: i. Document how the study intersections currently operate. ii. Forecast the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development. iii. Determine how the study intersections will operate in the future build- out year with the proposed development traffic. iv. Determine the parking demand of the proposed development. v. Review pedestrian and bicycle accommodations vi. Recommend improvements, if needed. For the purposes of this traffic study, the study intersections were determined with input from the City of Edina and are: i. Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue J. Western Site Access Intersection on Valley View Road iii. Eastern Site Access Intersection on Valley View Road iv. Southern Site Access Intersection on Wooddale Avenue v. Center Site Access Intersection on Wooddale Avenue vi. Northern Site Access Intersection on Wooddale Avenue This traffic impact study is based upon a concept development plan dated December 2014. As long as the general characteristics of the proposed development remain approximately the same as documented here, minor changes in the final design are not expected to alter the results or recommendations of this study. Atc U Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spook Consulting 2 Traffic Impact Study 2. Proposed Development The site of the proposed development is located on the northwest corner of Valley View Road & Wooddale Avenue in Edina, Minnesota. The site is located adjacent to the parking area of an existing shopping center. Figure 1 in the Appendix shows the site location. The development is proposed to be a 3,065 square foot restaurant building. As part of the development the eastern site access on Valley View Road and southern site access on Wooddale Avenue would be closed. Approximately 22 new parking stalls would be included adjacent to the restaurant on site. Figure 2 in the Appendix shows the concept plan for the proposed site and its access locations. For the purposes of this study, full occupancy of the site is assumed in 2018. 3. Analyses of Existing Co id t ois a. Transportation Network Characteristics Valley View Road is Edina Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) 164 west of Wooddale Avenue. East of Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road is Edina MSAS 150. Valley View Road is a two lane, undivided east-west road with a 30 mph speed limit near the site. East of Wooddale Avenue there is a two- way left turn lane on Valley View Road that stretches over 700 feet until the West 62nd Street/Oaklawn Avenue intersection. A left turn lane also exists on eastbound Valley View Road at Wooddale Avenue. Valley View Road extends from Normandale Road along Highway 100 in the west to France Avenue in the southeast. Wooddale Avenue is Edina MSAS 150 north of Valley View Road and a local street south of Valley View Road. Wooddale Avenue is a two lane, undivided north-south road with a 30 mph speed limit near the site. Wooddale Avenue extends from Excelsior Boulevard in St. Louis Park in the north to two blocks south of Valley View Road. Shared bicycle lanes exist on Valley View Road east of Wooddale Avenue which transition to separated, on-street bicycle lanes near Brookview Avenue. Shared bicycle lanes that exist on Wooddale Avenue north of Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue become a bicycle boulevard south of Valley View Road. 44c Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 3 Traffic Impact Study West of Wooddale Avenue, there is a sidewalk on the south side of Valley View Road. East of Wooddale Avenue, there are sidewalks on both sides of Valley View Road. There is a sidewalk on the east side of Wooddale Avenue north of Valley View Road and there are no sidewalks along Wooddale Avenue south of Valley View Road. Bus stops exist on Valley View Road on the east side of Wooddale Avenue as well as on Wooddale Avenue north of Valley View Road. Valley View Road is served by Metro Transit route 587 which is an express bus route between Downtown Minneapolis and Bloomington with service during weekday rush hours only. Wooddale Avenue is served by Metro Transit route 6 which is a local bus route between the University of Minnesota, Downtown Minneapolis and Edina with service approximately once an hour near the site throughout the week. The Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection is under all-way stop control. The site accesses are under side street stop control. The existing traffic control and travel lanes are shown in Figure 3 in the Appendix for the study intersections b. Traffic Volumes Intersection video was collected at the study intersections under weekday conditions in August 2016. Using these videos, 48-hour turning movement counts were obtained at the study intersections. The data from the two days was averaged to give a better representation of the traffic going through the intersections on a "typical day" by smoothing out any irregularities. The a.m. and p.m. peak hours for the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection were found to be from 8:15 to 9:15 a.m. and 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. The counts from these two peak hours were used at all of the study intersections for analysis. The turning movement count data from the counts are contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. ,`t'7 1 Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 4 Traffic Impact Study C. Intersection Level of Service Cosa An intersection capacity analysis was then conducted for s = j the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity „__4._ - Manual, 2010. Intersections are assigned a "Level of 4-7--:" Service" letter grade for the peak hour of traffic based on 1;..a the number of lanes, traffic volumes, and traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light traffic flow Losc - (free flow conditions) while LOS F represents heavy 20---7z 1‘4. :,. traffic flow (over capacity conditions). LOS D at t = ` intersections is typically considered acceptable by most government agencies. Individual movements are also .. assigned LOS grades. At busy intersections, one or more LOS D=Acceptable individual movements may operate at LOS F when the i .4-0-4#-,-.!:.7,-4-.---,,,,,,1 overall intersection is operating acceptably at LOS D or --s- " better. „_ "` %_.:__ The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades (from a signal controlled intersection in San Jose, LOS!=Unacceptable; CA). These LOS grades represent the overall intersection F' ."=f: operation, not individual movements. ,� .... The existing peak hour turning movement volumes were Sour��,‘F-- e.City of used in these LOS calculations. The LOS calculations San Jose,CA were completed with the VISTROTM software package, which uses the methodology detailed in the Highway Capacity Manual 2010. A summary of the LOS results for the existing study peak hours, based on the traffic control and lane configurations that are being constructed, is shown in Table 1. Full results, including grades for each individual movement, are included in the Appendix. Table 1 ® Existing Peak Hour Level of Service Results Intersection AMPeak Hour' i PM Peak Hour' Valley View Rd/Wooddale Ave B (c) E (f) Valley View Rd/Western Access A (b) A(c) Valley View Rd/Eastern Access A (b) A (a) Wooddale Ave/Southern Access A (a) A (a) Wooddale Ave/Center Access A (b) A (b) Wooddale Ave/Northern Access A (b) A(b) 1The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection.The second letter(in parentheses)is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement. As shown in Table 1, the site accesses are all operating acceptably at LOS A during both peak hours. The Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection is operating acceptably at LOS B in the a.m. peak hour, but is at LOS E in the p.m. peak hour. Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 5 Traffic Impact Study At Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue in the existing p.m. peak hour, the northbound, southbound and eastbound approaches are at LOS C or better with 95th percentile queue lengths of five vehicles or less. It is the westbound approach at LOS F with 95th percentile queues of 18 vehicles that cause the intersection to operate at LOS E. Of note, both through and right turn volumes are high and combined in one lane for these movements. If the westbound left turn lane at Valley View Road at Wooddale Avenue were swapped for a right turn lane (combining through and left turn movements instead), that would allow all approaches to operate at LOS C or better in the p.m. peak hour. Given the characteristics of the corridor (such as the two-way left turn lane to the east and parking lots close to the road on the north side), this change or addition geometry at the intersection do not appear feasible nor necessarily fit these characteristics. Another possible mitigation option is upgrading the intersection to a signalized intersection. Using the turning movement counts, the volume signal warrants (Warrants 1-3) were reviewed for the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection using the methodology from the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Satisfying one or more warrants indicates that a traffic signal may be appropriate for an intersection. With the existing turning movement volumes, the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection does not satisfy any of the volume warrants. The warrant results can be seen in the Appendix. d. Site Parking Using the turning movement counts at the site accesses, the amount of vehicle parking currently utilizing the shopping center was able to be calculated by counting the entering and exiting vehicles at each access. Summing up the entering and exiting numbers from each access, the number of vehicles in the parking lot was able to be found with the assumption that the lot was empty at midnight before the first day of counts. Utilizing that data, it was found that the maximum number of vehicles in the lot during one 15-minute period occurred at 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, August 3 with 58 vehicles in the lot. The maximum the next day was 46 vehicles at 11:15 a.m. The parking lot counts can be seen in the Appendix. A count of the parking lot shows there are currently 93 striped parking stalls on site for the shopping center including four accessible spaces. During a site visit several vehicles were noted to be parked behind the shopping center on the north side of the property in unmarked parking spaces. Assuming all of the vehicles in the lot during the peak parking time were located in striped parking stalls, there were a minimum of 35 parking stalls available at all times. Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 6 Traffic Impact Study 4. Projected Traffic a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the development site based on rates for a restaurant. Often times, trip generation analyses are based on the rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. However, Spack Consulting has also collected trip generation data at different land uses in the Twin Cities area, including for restaurants. The data that the Spack Consulting rates are based on were collected in the Twin Cities between 2014 and 2015. Compared to the ITE data set which is from across the nation over several decades, the Spack Consulting data gives a better representation of the amount of traffic to be expected in this area. For each analysis, the raw trip generation was divided amongst three types of trips — new, pass-by, and internal. Pass-by trips are those motorists already on the roads that will include a stop at the development site in the future. Internal trips are those that stop at two or more locations within the site. This would include any trips that come to the proposed restaurant as well as the existing adjacent shopping center. New trips represent traffic that will increase the overall number of vehicles at the intersections. A more detailed trip generation table showing these breakdowns is in the Appendix. Table 2 shows the expected trip generation for the development site for weekday peaks. Table 2 — Expected Site Trip Generation based on Local Data' Weekday Dally fx. AM'peak'liour ,1H, PM-Peak Hour. Description . = l • = In Out3 €S Passbyt�`, xln �; ;out Passby I In Out ` Passby Restaurant 110 110 167 3 2 3 12 6 13 (3,065 square feet) Trip Generation data collected by Spack Consulting at 12 sites in years 2015 and 2016. A trip distribution pattern was developed based on existing traffic patterns in the area and access to the regional transportation system. For this study, the trip distribution pattern is as follows: ® 20 percent to/from the north on Wooddale Avenue e 5 percent to/from the south on Wooddale Avenue • 30 percent to/from the west on Valley View Road • 45 percent to/from the east on Valley View Road Traffic generated by the site development was assigned to the area roadways per this distribution pattern. Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 7 Traffic Impact Study b. Non-Site Traffic Forecasting Non-site traffic accounts for growth due to specific and/or non-specific development in the study area. Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2018 No-Build Scenarios based on background growth rates to account for non-specific development in the area. The Edina Comprehensive Plan — 2008 Update shows traffic forecasts for the year 2030 on many of the City's roadways. Comparing these forecasts to previously collected data, growth rates were able to be found. According to the comprehensive plan, Valley View Road is forecast to have higher growth than Wooddale Avenue. The annual growth rates found were approximately 0.6% per year on Wooddale Avenue and 3.6% per year on Valley View Road. These annual growth rates were applied to the existing volumes for two years to project volumes for the No-Build Scenarios. c. Total Traffic Traffic forecasts for the 2018 Build scenarios were developed by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development to the 2018 No-Build volumes. The resultant peak hour forecasts are shown in the Appendix under the capacity analysis section for each scenario. 5. Analysis of Future Conditions a. Level of Service Analysis The forecasted turning movement volumes for 2018 were used to re-analyze the study intersections. As before, the LOS calculations were done in accordance with the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual using VISTROTM software. The Valley View Road/Eastern Site Access and Wooddale Avenue/Northern Site Access intersections were removed from the analysis for the Build scenarios due to the proposed layout of the site. A5I Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 8 Traffic Impact Study Table 3 shows the summary of the results with the complete LOS calculations in the Appendix for all scenarios. Table 3 ® 2018 Peak Hour Level of Service Results ` AM PeakHour' '' F Peak Rohe Intersection • No BUildhye Build„ , No,Build Build Valley View Rd/Wooddale Ave C (c) C (c) F (f) F (f) Valle View Rd/Western Access A (b) A (b) A (c) A (c) Valley View Rd/Eastern Access A (b) n/a A(a) n/a Wooddale Ave/Southern Access A (a) n/a A (a) n/a Wooddale Ave/Center Access A (b) A (b) A(b) A(b) Wooddale Ave/Northern Access A (b) A (b) A (b) A (b) 1The first letter is the Level of Service for the intersection.The second letter(in parentheses) is the Level of Service for the worst operating movement. As shown in Table 3, similar to the existing scenarios there are not forecast to be any operational issues at the site accesses. The Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection is forecast to operate acceptably in the a.m. peak hour scenarios. With the additional background traffic growth, the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection is forecast to decrease to LOS F operations in the p.m. peak hour. This is due to the large westbound traffic volumes, particularly through and right turn volumes that are combined in one lane. Once again, though it would not necessarily fit the characteristics of the corridor, if the exclusive westbound left turn lane at Valley View Road at Wooddale Avenue were swapped for an exclusive right turn lane that would allow all approaches to operate at LOS D or better in the p.m. peak hour. The 2018 Build volumes signal warrant 1-3 are still not met, though seven of eight hours for Warrant 1 are met. This signifies that the intersection may meet warrants further into the future. The warrant results can be seen in the Appendix. There is no change in LOS results and little change in the delays and vehicle queue lengths at the study intersections with the addition of the development traffic. These results suggest that the addition of this development will not have a significant impact on the existing transportation network and no improvements are required as a result of this development. The removal of the existing eastern site access on Valley View Road and the existing southern access on Wooddale Avenue can be seen as beneficial to the overall network. The removal of these two site accesses that are located close to the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection will improve safety near the site by eliminating conflict points and removing turning operations from areas of vehicle queuing. Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 9 Traffic Impact Study b. Vehicle Parking Forecasting & Analysis The City of Edina requires a minimum amount of off-street parking for new buildings that can vary depending on the type of building use. From Section 36-1311 of the Edina City Code, for restaurants not directly located within a shopping center, the minimum amount of parking required must be equal to one-third the maximum seating capacity plus one space for each employee on the major shift. The proposed restaurant has 75 indoor seats which equates to 25 parking spaces required. Estimating 12 employees on a major shift, the minimum parking for the site is 37 parking spaces. There are 22 proposed parking stalls on the site for the restaurant. This would fall short of the City's requirements by 15 parking stalls and a parking variance would be needed from the City of Edina. If the parking lot for the proposed restaurant is full, patrons will likely park in the existing adjacent lot for the shopping center. Based on the previously discussed parking lot counts, on the two days that counts were conducted there were always at least 35 vacant parking spaces in the lot. This would accommodate the overflow parking from the restaurant. However, the peak parking for the existing shopping center occurred during the midday period and the peak parking for the restaurant is likely to occur during the evening period. The counts show that there would be much more available parking within the shopping center during that time as the existing counts showed there being over 60 vacant spots in the lot during the evening period. According to section 36-1312 of the Edina City Code, retail uses in the Planned Commercial District are required a minimum of eight spaces for the first 1,000 square feet plus six spaces for each additional 1,000 square feet up to 15,000 total square feet. With the existing adjacent retail space, not including Snuffy's restaurant, being over 13,000 square feet, that equates to a minimum parking requirement of 80 parking spaces. According to City staff, 26 parking spaces are required for the existing Snuffy's restaurant. This equates to 106 parking spaces needed for the existing shopping center. That is higher than the 95 existing spaces. Altogether, the required vehicle parking for the proposed restaurant and existing shopping center is 143 spaces. The existing parking spaces added to the proposed parking equals 117 spaces proposed to be provided. This is a total of 26 parking spaces short of the required amount for the site. ITE also has a document, Parking Generation, 4th Edition, of compiled parking demand data from different land uses. Using that document, the average peak period parking demand for a High-Turnover Sit Down Suburban Restaurant with a bar is 13.30 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building for a typical weekday and 16.30 for a typical Saturday. The rates in the same A si Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 10 Traffic Impact Study category per seat in the restaurant would be 0.48 spaces per seat on a typical weekday and 0.47 spaces per seat on a typical Saturday. Table 4 shows the expected weekday parking demand using these rates. Table 4— Expected Restaurant Parking Demand1 Land Uses = '.LiAgg,, 1-611 gt6101 Restaurant (3,065 square feet) 41 spaces 50 spaces Restaurant (75 seats) 36 spaces 35 spaces 1Based on ITE Parking Generation,4th Edition. As shown in Table 4, the expected parking demand per seat based on ITE data is similar to the City of Edina's minimum requirements. The ITE data in addition to giving parking rates, also lists the peak period for land uses. For a restaurant with a bar, the peak hour on a weekday is approximately 7:00 p.m. As previously mentioned, there is currently enough available parking in the shopping center lot at this time period to accommodate anticipated overflow from the restaurant. However, there are some existing vacancies in the shopping center and if those spaces are filled there may be increased parking demand in the parking lot. To forecast the parking demand of the shopping center if it was at full capacity, ITE's Parking Generation, 4th Edition was used. This document lists that for a shopping center the average peak period parking demand in a non- December month is 2.55 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building for a typical weekday and 2.87 for a typical Saturday. For a suburban high-turnover sit- down family restaurant such as Snuffy's Malt Shop the peak period parking demand is 10.60 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building for a typical weekday and 13.50 for a typical Saturday. Table 5 shows the expected weekday parking demand for the entire shopping center using these rates. Table 5— Expected Shopping Center Parking Demand1 LandAlse ,',,1 IeelciajrM 'Saturd4yn, Shopping Center 34 spaces 38 spaces (13,400 square feet) Restaurant 17 spaces 22 spaces (1,600 square feet) Total 51 spaces 60 spaces 1Based on ITE Parking Generation, 4th Edition. Summing the forecast parking totals from Tables 4 and 5, if the peak period of the proposed restaurant and all of the uses within the shopping center occurred at the same time the maximum amount of parking demand on site would be 92 spaces on a weekday and 110 spaces on a Saturday. The proposed 117 spaces on site would be able to accommodate those peak demands. Given the expected demand is lower than the provided spaces, a parking variance from the City of Edina is appropriate and recommended to be granted. A'S Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 11 Traffic Impact Study c. Parking Lot Alternatives It should be noted that additional space is available within the existing - , �� ��;, shopping center parking lot to create , ,�• _ more off-street parking spaces. One /,-/ j option is to revise the site signing and /. _ I lighting locations, which would allow =� ; for stripping additional parking. The for adjacent picture shows the potential '' parking that could be added in this ' manner. Another option is a complete __ stripping. Currently, the main parking lot area has two east-west drive aisles along with four rows of parking. • However, the southern drive aisle is • over 40 feet wide, which is more space than necessary. Re-striping % ; • could provide five rows of parking icy with three drive aisles. Due to space ? • restrictions, these rows would likely need to be angled or parallel and the I-- drive drive aisles may need to be restricted ; - 1 to one-way traffic only. The adjacent '' picture shows one possible layout assuming re-stripping of the parking t l lot. As shown, approximately 16 parking spaces could be gained under this option. Though the existing parking lot and the proposed restaurant parking area are forecast to be able to accommodate the parking for the site, additional parking could be provided to provide an additional eight, 16, or more new parking spaces on the site. d. Alternative Forms of Transportation In order to reduce the amount of vehicle traffic, alternative forms of transportation, such as walking, biking, and transit, for accessing the site should be encouraged. Having access to other modes of travel is often seen as an amenity and general benefit to the site. When provided as part of an overall network of trails and public transit, the net effect is a reduction in traffic volumes, vehicle parking needs, and better overall traffic operations. It should be noted that no reduction in vehicular traffic for these alternative modes was applied for the analysis in this report. Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 12 Traffic Impact Study As discussed earlier, existing bus stops, bicycle facilities and sidewalks are already provided near the site, though there are no existing sidewalks along the site. Per the site plan shown in the Appendix, sidewalks are proposed along the development site on both Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue. To further encourage non-vehicular access to the site, it is recommended that crosswalks be included on the southbound and westbound approaches at the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection. This will be consistent with striping in other areas and provide the appropriate crossing area between the proposed sidewalks on the site and the existing sidewalk network for pedestrians. The City of Edina has a non-residential bicycle parking requirement for developments requiring 20 or more vehicle spaces. This requirement is equal to five percent of the total provided vehicle parking spaces, resulting in three required bicycle parking spaces for this site that shall be located within 50 feet of the public entrance to the building. To further encourage bicycle travel, it is suggested that bicycle racks with space for more than the minimum three bicycles be provided. e. Site Review As seen in the Appendix, the site plan shows the proposed site is to be surrounded by vehicle parking on all four sides. In order to give safe access to pedestrians that either walked to the site or parked in the adjacent shopping center parking lot, it is recommended that sidewalks be constructed on-site, where possible, or crossing areas be identified leading to the main entrance. Clearly identified pedestrian crossing locations between the site and adjacent shopping center parking lot as well as the general parking areas will encourage safer passage for pedestrians around the site. With one-way vehicle flow through the proposed parking area of the site, signing and/or pavement markings will be important to discourage wrong way drivers. This could include `Do Not Enter' signs, pavement arrows indicating the direction of flow, or other similar types of driver notices. • AS1) Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 13 Traffic Impact Study 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The traffic and parking impacts of the proposed development on the study intersections and site were analyzed. The following conclusions were drawn from the information and analysis of this study: • When fully occupied, the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 390 daily trips including approximately 10 trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 30 trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour. • With existing volumes, the Valley View RoadlWooddale Avenue intersection operates at LOS E in the p.m. peak hour and is forecast to operate at LOS F in the 2018 p.m. peak hour. The poor operations are due to the high volume of westbound traffic, particularly the through and right turn traffic that are combined in one lane. • The Valley View RoadiWooddale Avenue intersection does not meet signal warrants with existing or 2018 traffic volumes. The intersection may meet warrants with more growth than estimated in this study. • With the forecast 2018 traffic volumes including the traffic generated by the proposed development, the site access intersections are expected to operate acceptably during the peak periods. • The proposed 22 parking spaces to be provided for the new restaurant fall short of the minimum 37 parking spaces required by the City of Edina. A parking variance will be needed. • A sufficient amount of open vehicle parking spaces in the adjacent shopping center parking lot during weekday evening periods are available to accommodate overflow parking demand from the proposed restaurant. • Forecast parking demand for the restaurant and fully occupied shopping center are less than the proposed amount of parking on site. • The removal of two existing accesses as part of this development will improve safety in the area. • The site will need to provide at least three bicycle parking spaces to meet City of Edina requirements. No improvement to the study intersections are needed solely due to expected traffic associated with this development. However, the Valley View Road/1Nooddale Avenue intersection should be monitored to determine if and when a traffic signal is justified, which would improve westbound operations during the p.m. peak hour. Given the availability of parking spaces in the adjacent lot along with the forecast parking demand being lower than the proposed number of parking spaces, a parking variance from the City of Edina is appropriate and recommended to be granted. Depending upon the exact change in parking configuration, eight, 16, or potentially more parking spaces could be added on site with a re-stripping of the existing shopping center parking lot. A r Valley View& Wooddale Rezoning Spack Consulting 14 Traffic Impact Study It is recommended that more than three bicycle parking spaces be provided to encourage bicycling to the site. To further encourage non-vehicular access to the site, it is also recommended that crosswalks be included on the southbound and westbound approaches at the Valley View RoadM/ooddale Avenue intersection to give pedestrian access between the proposed sidewalks on the site and the existing sidewalk network. Sidewalks and/or marked crossing areas along the building leading to the main entrance, and also between the proposed building and the adjacent shopping center, are recommended as well. 7. Appe tldiN a. Figures 1-3 1•. Trip Generation Table c. Signal Warrant Results d. Turning Movement Counts e. Parking ►Lot Counts f. Capacity Analysis Backup • AM Peak Hour Existing • PM Peak Hour Existing • AM Peak Hour 2018 No-Build • PM Peak Hour 2018 No-Build • AM Peak Hour 2018 Build • PM Peak Hour 2018 Build Appendix A - Figures aC Figure 1 Location Maps _ _ iu .. ic HE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY - ---,t North No Scale �' .. _,_,:. Edina g.,. • (1311 2 , .. .... R• ii=htiClw i,:'1 , . its=_q = „..„,,...., , ,...._ nt-., t ric(_:enter v,. _ , ?C a� ;. .. 1171 p, a ++, _ „ -5!'t, I t ':°-''' Fr., .9 ..F.x.r ,j - ', l',..11)-:°*. tl st, - �, ,t" �}j ":r p_ +ms ,v€s` '".°i Q t � ., S. " �` ; .e 11 s. _ ..... .:,, „..,.., 4..,... ... -. R d t "°�. UV 613:-t St yip. 4 • # - Proposed Site r,--7,14,,,,l. •.--t, t. �` —after , ,., New:— Ac derny < e �e%- +6... µ y�r - 4 ;5 - Traffic Impact Study A 1 p Jr1 Valley View& Wooddale Appendix A - Figures sa c k Higure 2 _____, ___., Concept' Plan PTHE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY • - , 4 North Restaurant Plan No Scale ....._ , ----.\ toil 0 0 i 0 i 0 71,9!‘k . _ . > .. M ' . .--_ — i ----..,_ 1 „.. . 1 . .s. I ....„... fr, . .74,A,O &Tp.,N,. .L •. ..„,. . "7-----------....„.„...._______________ ....,..• P4r rAte" 0 WO 0 FROM°led PAUL DZLIENAR I VALLEY VIEW&WOODDALE AVE RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 1 2014 p*.ge 5 . , Traffic Impact Study A 2 A.6() Valley View& Wooddale Appendix A - Figures .------,-, q ,.1Figure 3 Existing Roadway Configuration .• ,. • ,. . ;,. ... . . . .:... ..... . ..... . THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY - ,a 4 .4•4 4 ' - . ,, jk- • ilia.---; y ,.. it • P"-\ , ..: . , ...... , . r.,.•.. ri,... ,„,.. il . i , ...E„, ..., .„ _ „. •,11, .A..i..., ., -4; , "4, - — t-' : 4 -.. _. ? . 4, '' '•"'.;''''-( ,...... . . . _ ,.. . . „ -i4:- :,,.: . 'it,10:' ''''' - A •, ' .' , - - . — . "-e,, Yr.,' ; ., --,..,-, 4-7;%-.1.4. .., ',7=''' .vii, . • A ,...., _ *, , -.4.,.. V-mi,... , '-r ---r- • '-.).4,41mi_ . -41 '44,:- " ----..%".,`4106,qv:, .;I a:Ai* -' -' 11 *- i• !'•'-1. - liii Lo P,-7,--44•4';' _. .. - -- •L.:- l' t t . - ,1.,,,,,t,„-;f:': "-N,. -- ‘,..)4.,. ,6•ii• , : , '`'2: - - --- .1, - ;- .-.., .,,,;-;,,..'-,• a • ------.-."--- -----,,,,,.. ,; -- - 1 1 . , -. . ..--''1-- _,.!------------ -.''''' 0 '' ------------'''-''''' N.\\\\ 0 r'. .. .--"--------- 0."' • 7. ' .. \'' --,___} ----- SI , 0 .."•,>,... ,--',s, rilik( ----) 'Wj sa''''`.-.)( ''''...i.---.' ) ''''.06. . ..1'.....) \ / , . -,.. ------„, ______----- ---... ---- ----. 0".-„------ ' \s, ,-"- 1 r-- -,„ ,. . ' -----------------,N 0"--- 1 ,../.., ..,- ( \\\\ -r 1' 41-01 1 it ,--. 1 i ) t i \ i -...,1 / ‘^- . '.„ _.• • i , ',.. I Traffic Impact Study A 3 AG I Valley View&Wooddale Appendix B - Trip Generation Table STable BI , . ._ .. . . ack , • . . THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Forecast Trip Generatic Weekday Daily Volumes LAND USE ITE DEVELOPMENT QUANTITY DAILY ENTER EXIT INTERNAL INTERNAL PASSBY PASSBY NEW TRIPS CODE# UNITS RATE PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT TRIPS PERCENT TRIPS ENTER EXIT High-Turnover Sit Down Restaurant Local 1,000 GFA 3.1 145.36 50% 50% 13% 58 43% 167 110 110 Total 58 167 110 110 Weekday AM Peak Hour LAND USE ITE DEVELOPMENT AM ENTER EXIT INTERNAL INTERNAL PASSBY PASSBY NEW TRIPS CODE# UNITS QUANTITY RATE PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT TRIPS PERCENT TRIPS ENTER EXIT High-Turnover Sit Down Restaurant Local 1,000 GFA 3.1 2.80 61% 39% 6% 1 43% 3 3 2 Total 1 3 3 2 Weekday PM Peak Hour LAND USE ITE DEVELOPMENT PM ENTER EXIT INTERNAL INTERNAL PASSBY PASSBY NEW TRIPS CODE# UNITS QUANTITY RATE PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT TRIPS PERCENT TRIPS ENTER EXIT High-Turnover Sit Down Restaurant Local 1,000 GFA 3.1 13.71 66% 34% 27% 11 43% 13 12 6 Total 11 13 12 6 / NOTES: 1. GFA=Gross Floor Area 2. Trip generation rates based on data collected in the Twin Cities by Spack Consulting. 3. A.M.Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic(one hour between 7 and 9 a.m.). 4. P.M.Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4 and 6 p.m.). 5. Reduction for internal trips (Internal Percent) is based on "Trip Generation Handbook", Institute of Transportation Engineers,3rd Edition. 6. Reduction for pass-by trips (Passby Percent) is based on "Trip Generation Handbook", Institute of Transportation Engineers,3rd Edition. Traffic Impact Study Bl Valley View & Wooddale PAC� Appendix C - Signal Warrant Results - Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ACADEMY Warrants 1 - 3 (Volume Warrants) Project Name _ , ,;,„ Valley View Rd&Wooddale Ave Project/File 283-16-01 Scenario *.-° Existing i• Intersection Inform'etion . Major Street(E/W Road) Valley View Rd Minor Street(N/S Road) Wooddale Ave Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 9186 vehicles Total Approach Volume 2573.5 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 0 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 0 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Volume Warrant thresholds. SVR off (ilk,110 t j0. _ri jaiji VV, i rdbU 0 VV,0 Alp ` Condition A Condition B Condition A+B* Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 5 hours 2 hours 11(Cond.A)&3(Cond.B) Criteria-Major Street(veh/hr) 600 900 480(Cond.A)&720(Cond.B) Criteria-Minor Street(veh/hr) 150 75 120(Cond.A)&60(Cond.B) *Should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems. UY li _l4, I fli In o u(r 1V it o .0 r+titffln r'-' ,. - _ . A'..,. Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied _ Required values reached for 2 hours Criteria See Figure Below \Y.t 11C'li 5Sr, 1,-t 0 :t i71V'C'tUfLtj7' a ra'; ' ---"-.4',,.. _..E". .,_.. Condition A Condition B Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 1208 total,202 minor,0.8 delay 0 hours Criteria-Total Approach Volume(veh in one hour) 800 Criteria-Minor Street High Side Volume(veh in one hour) 100 See Figure Below Criteria-Minor Street High Side Delay(veh-hrs) 4 RiNfiri <g4(y vii :g L.[ DT@ 4X= (lav +ll . _ 800 —O.-Warrant 2 Threshold .-1—.Warrr ant 3 Threshold • Intersection Volumes 700 o t' 600 0 I In. • 500 - ' L .,. • 400 • 300 V -it, a B 200 Jo+: _-� c 100 o r •! • 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Major Street Volume(Both Approaches) Speck Academy is part of the Spack Enterprise family of companies Spack MikeOn S PAC K rouv-r dimo -, vi ItIE�.,. traffic ACA3EMY Cor5Jcl teaFs C DATA INC. Traffic Impact Study C 1 ti (3 Valley View & Wooddale Appendix C - Signal Warrant Results Taff c Signa Warrant Ana ysk ACADEMY Warrants 1 - 3 (Volume Warrants) Project Name 4 Valley View Rd&Wooddale Ave Project/File 44 -;. 283-16-01 Scenario ) 2018 No-Build '1111111.1111111111111Int-ersection InformatloiD ' " " Major Street(E/W Road) Valley View Rd Minor Street(N/S Road) Wooddale Ave Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 9829.02 vehicles Total Approach Volume 2599.235 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 0 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 0 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Volume Warrant thresholds. UrreirMiik_Ir: l(1(71Inc'd?\)til._c d Rrh Y OUEii Condition A Condition B Condition A+B* Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 7 hours 2 hours 12(Cond.A)&3(Cond.B) Criteria-Major Street(veh/hr) 600 900 480(Cond.A)&720(Cond.B) Criteria-Minor Street(veh/hr) 150 75 120(Cond.A)&60(Cond.B) I` *Should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems. ai ti's ,, 11607 K -tltr`bCaf@llef Y o ume • Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 2 hours Criteria See Figure Below T_Vir 1>-R IA, Lipa.ciao.?vig.o ?tft Ute ii(W. " . '- Condition A Condition B Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 1279 total,204 minor,0.8 delay 0 hours Criteria-Total Approach Volume(veh in one hour) 800 Criteria-Minor Street High Side Volume(veh in one hour) 100 See Figure Below Criteria-Minor Street High Side Delay(veh-hrs) 4 -: - _. . .., .r fk 4g:a.Wit [.1l4 fir@ 6CG33( _ .3 A* 800 -*-Warrant 2 Threshold Warrant 3 Threshold • Intersection Volumes ? Appendix C - Signal Warrant Results S PAC K Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis a s g Yis ACADEMY Warrants 1 - 3 (Volume Warrants) Project Name A Valley View Rd&Wooddale Ave Project/File# ,ailiMill 283-16-01 Scenario - 1111111 2018 Build Intersection Infdrrriatioff"'' Major Street(E/W Road) Valley View Rd Minor Street(N/S Road) Wooddale Ave Analyzed with 2 or more approach lanes Analyzed with 1 Approach Lane Total Approach Volume 9907.42 vehicles Total Approach Volume 2632.835 vehicles Total Ped/Bike Volume 0 crossings Total Ped/Bike Volume 0 crossings Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied Right turn reduction of 0 percent applied No high speed or isolated community reduction applied to the Volume Warrant thresholds. smemommosmanellognaninajaCV:I III lADD7 lei l n fl`9 1_ ?Vkttfca " Condition A Condition B Condition A+B* Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied _ Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 7 hours 2 hours 12(Cond.A)&3(Cond.B) Criteria-Major Street(veh/hr) 600 900 480(Cond.A)&720(Cond.B) Criteria-Minor Street(veh/hr) 150 75 120(Cond.A)&60(Cond.B) *Should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems. Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Required values reached for 2 hours Criteria See Figure Below — -- --- - :. •...1t:F''30..1-(-i-.:ltii40nTlv�asaft.r31JCYNiaY?`,,"'_._ Condition A Condition B Condition Satisfied? Not Satisfied Not Satisfied Required values reached for 1291 total,206 minor,0.9 delay 0 hours Criteria-Total Approach Volume(veh in one hour) 800 Criteria-Minor Street High Side Volume(veh in one hour) 100 See Figure Below Criteria-Minor Street High Side Delay(veh-hrs) 4 Jl c., 1( G`I! UC 4'GC4.j(1aYk_W;nt 3 ,- 800 - -G)=-Warrant 2 Threshold mak—Warrant 3 Threshold • Intersection Volumes >, 700 O 0 600 d 500 - ". 400 a 300 115, 200 • C/DN�• a 100 • • �....'.. � 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Major Street Volume(Both Approaches) Speck Academy is part of the Spack Enterprise family of companies Spack MikeOn S PAC K cuhr o�G�ia ___0 o traffic ACADEMY CorS.C;an TRA: OATt AI c. Traffic Impact Study C 3 Valley View& Wooddale 4GS CD [G .r i„- y - _:i.. N CC W ip W w I i -- - II(LI-I 0 i: ' • IZ P I ,,,_< 1111,1— ' : ®I Q . MIW r►---- / H I- z z zr, w w i a Q _ W J W I— •- - ci " Q F Z z 7EC �v I- a LLI CC 1 - ,II > • o LU cc W Q Z m f.<s 111 L Wt a a si CD nitt.b el 0 ''''''' :'''' I N, i a Li ® I i N ,,,-.......L.r f �. CD s .._ .._ (a.-_. .._ o ir: .."4,-,..• .. - I. _WI ;iq. s b - ,�,.. : o e j3 AI C Restaurant Plan 44,4J ENTRANCE *y ft •'..., 0 0 _ T,y, 1 T!'lflt76P ATA<]IlN - k cc ls so r, ' -""Vill' if);..SO FT°'.r:: EMOVE ..q"...,.. E• ^. NTRANCE NcREG f-A'I( C Cdy _ n!ry¢rJ FT. "".-,. Ilk ENTRANCE. 4441141011114 7A.s ENT•V g¢�. RAIN GARDE 4 , ENT1HNCE 0 600.00 PROMO 60PAUL DZUBNAR 1 VALLEY VIEW&WOODDALE AVE RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT DECEMBER 1 2014 page 5 (J) ' w CV. #_ N1 CC w O] ♦ ill U W ''''-'ii: Lit - : „,'3. ' .t d ..,...:,. 11 , •, ._: „...c..z........., i .,,, i„,i)„.,.. . ,...... .....:1 ,,. k : .....:! ..,,..., T__ ,?„...,. ,..„,,,i ,.... ._,,... . . A I ,:_ I o g w "f' � inw F- D r i Q U1 a w J 0 0 it- 711- 1 \ W z D w 0 d : ,! ".. V ® ' Cn . 0 o } • � 1. FA X s: w ISI ' vsof ,6r PC Meeting December 10, 2014 Draft minute summary VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan — 4500 Valley View Road, Edina, MN (Restaurant) Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop the northwest corner of Valley View and Wooddale at 4500 Valley View Road. Teague explained the proposal would remodel the existing vacant gas station into a restaurant. The remodeling would include a 500 square foot addition for new kitchen and trash enclosure and a three-season porch/patio. Teague said the restaurant would be designed for 80-86 seats; including the bar area. Continuing, Teague said the subject site is currently zoned PCD-4, Planned Commercial District-4, which only allows automobile service centers, gas stations, or car washes. Teague stated a rezoning from PCD-4 to PCD-1 would be requested to accommodate the proposed new use of the site, and a parking stall variance may also be needed. Concluding, Teague said the proposed use is consistent with Edina's Comprehensive Plan. Chair Staunton explained that a sketch plan review is not a public hearing; it's an opportunity for an applicant to get nonbinding feedback from the Commission on their project before they proceed with a formal application. Staunton further noted that at this time a "work group" is considering a small area plan for this area, adding Commissioners Lee and Forrest sit on that group and their feedback on their progress would be appreciated. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Fitzgerald, Chuck Nolan and Paul Dzubnar Discussion Commissioner Olsen commented that she was surprised a parking stall variance may be required. She said when she is in the area it appears to her that the parking lot isn't very full, adding shared parking would make sense at this location. Planner Teague agreed. He said the proposed change in use triggers the need for more parking. Teague said at this time he believes the site would be under parked per restaurant standards; however, in reality there would be the option for shared parking. Commissioner Carr said she wonders if there is enough room on the proposed boulevard to plant trees. Teague responded he believes there would be room to add 461 vegetation of some kind. Carr pointed out that planting on the boulevard area is an important traffic calming measure as outlined in the "living streets" concept. Commissioner Scherer asked if the site is "clean". She noted with a gas station use there is the possibility the site could be contaminated. Teague agreed, adding an assessment would need to be done before the proposal moves forward. Commissioner Schroeder stated the parking stall delineations for the gas station and the adjoining retail center is poorly configured. He said a new reconfiguration of the stalls may lessen the need for a parking variance. Commissioner Hobbs noted with the amount of pavement integrating a storm water plan is also challenging. Applicant Presentation Peter Fitzgerald, 5217 Kellogg Avenue addressed the Commission and explained he is a lifelong Edina resident and represents the commercial property owner Fred Allis. Fitzgerald said the goal of the development team is to create a family/meet-a-friend restaurant experience. Fitzgerald said they are excited about repurposing the gas station and making full use of the garage doors to create a great outdoor dining experience. Continuing, Fitzgerald said in the neighborhood everyone has wondered "what's going to happen to Wally's", adding the proposed renovation of the gas station to restaurant is a great opportunity to rebrand this corner creating an inviting and welcoming space for residents. Fitzgerald introduced members of the development team Chuck Nolan of Shea Architects and Paul Dzubnar. Chuck Nolan said he is excited about designing a restaurant that utilizes the existing gas station. Nolan explained that preliminary findings have found the site to be "clean"; however, more study needs to be done. With graphics Nolan pointed out the proposed addition to the rear of the building would house the kitchen, coolers and trash enclosure and the creation of 640 square feet of outdoor seating in a three-season porch/patio with retractable roof. Nolan said in his opinion this renovation and outdoor area would activate the corner. Concluding, Nolan said their intent is to create a warm and inviting community restaurant. Nolan further explained the drive access, the elimination of curb cuts close to the intersection and parking. Paul Dzubnar, told the Commission he is familiar with developing neighborhood restaurants including the Twisted Fork in the Grand Avenue/Hamline neighborhood. He stated he knows how to work with neighborhoods and how to capitalize on repurposing old buildings. Zooliner said he is excited about this project. it 7° Discussion Chair Staunton thanked the team and asked Commissioners Forrest and Lee their opinion on the project and its impact (if any) on the Wooddale Valley View small area plan process. Commissioner Forrest said their work thus far has indicated that the residents are very invested in their neighborhood. Forrest encouraged everyone including the applicants to visit the City's website for more information on the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. Commissioner Lee commented that in her opinion the subject site could be considered the heart of the area. She said from the meetings and feedback so far the proposed use fits well with what was envisioned for the area. Lee said during their discussions it was realized that redevelopment of the area would occur in steps, adding this could be considered the first step. Lee reiterated how important this corner is in her opinion, adding it should be pedestrian friendly. Lee further commented that she is unsure if a rain garden is appropriate at this corner as depicted. Continuing, Lee also stated she would like careful attention paid to the exterior building materials. Concluding, Lee said the goal should be to create a sense of place and if done correctly this would accomplish that. She added this is a very exciting first step. Commissioner Platteter stated he gives the concept a "thumbs up". He said some details of the plan need to be reconsidered, especially in his opinion the parking up to the street. Platteter said the Commission looks favorably at creating an active pedestrian friendly environment pointing out in his opinion this location can be considered the entrance into this neighborhood. Platteter suggested that bike racks be added, and that other pedestrian friendly amenities be included on the site. Commissioner Scherer stated she is exciting about the proposed reuse of the gas station as a restaurant, adding as previously stated this parking lot is never full and any redevelopment should create opportunities for shared parking. Commissioner Forrest said she agrees with all comments, reiterating the importance of this corner and its impact on the neighborhood. Forrest said she too would like the development team to retain aspects of the gas station . Continuing, Forrest commented that she observed on the proposed plans a half wall around the patio area; suggesting that area remain transparent encouraging pedestrian involvement. She said she agrees with the comment about the rain garden and suggested that the applicants use this area in some public fashion; maybe by adding a bench or some other form of welcome. Concluding, Forrest said she's not sure how she feels about the retractable roof element of the porch/patio. Mr. Dzubnar responded they aren't committed to the rain garden. It71 Commissioner Carr stated in her opinion with Minnesota weather a retractable concept makes sense. Carr said one issue about the open patio concept that could cause concern is noise.. Commissioner Schroeder referred to parking and observed parking stall counts may be better calculated according to use and not square footage. Schroeder said parking may need to be reimagined because the City doesn't want to see a site over or under- parked; and the current code may not sufficiently address how to "get there". Schroeder stated it needs to be right. Concluding, Schroeder said retaining architectural features of the gas station is an important part of maintaining the character of the neighborhood. He encouraged the applicants to pay attention to retaining elements of the garage. Commissioner Hobbs commended the applicant on repurposing the gas station. He asked the applicant if there is the possibility the gas station would be razed. Mr. Dzubnar responded that isn't an option. Chair Staunton reiterated the Commission isn't a big fan of over-parking but wants the applicant to be cognizant of their parking needs. Adequate parking is important to avoid spillage into the neighborhood that could cause issues. Commissioner Olsen commented she is supportive of the project and likes the aspect of using the garage doors to open up the garage. Olsen asked the applicant the hours the restaurant would be open. Mr. Dzubnar responded the restaurant would serve lunch and dinner. Chair Staunton thanked the applicants for their input and said the project as proposed is very exciting. He encouraged the applicant to work on shared parking, retaining architectural elements of the gas station, reconsidering placement of the rain garden to something else and with further encouragement to create a pedestrian friendly experience. n701\ Minutes/Edina City Council/December 16, 2014 The Council asked if an origin/destination study had been completed for 72nd Street. Mr. Millner responded that it had not. The Council discussed the application and repeated its requirement for a boulevard on 72nd Street and a right in/right out on France Avenue. Dean Dovolis, DJR Architecture, commented on timeframe and reviewed other possible entrance/exits. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to table consideration of Resolution No. 2014-150, Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding the Office Residential District Regarding Housing Density, Building Height, and Floor Area Ratio and Resolution No. 2014-151, Approving a Preliminary Rezoning to Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Development Plan for 7200 LLC, at 7200 France Avenue until the January 20, 2015 City Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. SKETCH PLAN FOR 4500 VALLEY VIEW ROAD—REVIEWED Proponent Presentation Peter Fitzgerald, 5217 Kellogg Avenue, representing owner Fred Allis, shared that he was a life-long resident of Edina and had been looking to revitalize this area for a long time. Paul Dzubnar, Green Mill Restaurants, and Chuck Nolan, Shea Architects, who were working on plans to convert the gas station at 4500 Valley View Road into a restaurant, presented design elements. Mr. Nolan presented the proposed layout and design for the restaurant. Mr. Dzubnar shared that the concept would be American fare and a place you could come with your family or friends. Following discussion of the 4500 Valley View Road sketch plan, the Council offered comments relating to: improved pedestrian connections, creating landscaping that was integral to the plan, parking, patio, lighting, noise, and windows on Wooddale to create additional views. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. PLANNING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 22, 2014 2. PARK BOARD, NOVEMBER 10, 2014 3. ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 23, OCTOBER 23, AND NOVEMBER 20, 2014 4. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, NOVEMBER 10, 2014 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE—Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS—Received Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to approve an increase of $.02 per resident to $.30 for dues for Interstate-494 to begin January I, 2015. The Council discussed whether it could designate the funds from the 2015 budget that had already been approved. Mr. Neal responded that the funds could be so designated. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS—Received XIII. ADJOURNMENT Page 6 N 73 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Sara Kaufman om> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 1:59 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker;Jason Kaufman Subject: In Support of Town Hall Brewery Hello Edina Planning Department, Per a letter I received in the mail the other day, I am writing to participate, by sharing my views, in relation to the proposed Town Hall Brewery. My family of five is 100% in support of the new Town Hall Brewery. The intersection of Wooddale and Valley View is in desperate need of redevelopment, and a great number of local residents are very much in favor of creating a small, neighborhood, walking destination. Small shops, restaurants, and a drug and hardware store would be fabulous additions. Our neighborhood is desperate for walkability, and adding a great destination is a step in the right direction. We have no concerns over noise, as some have cited, as it's doubtful our little corner will ever become a draw for loud party behavior. (In fact, I have the feeling the "Party Crowd" will be one demographic consistently missing from this bar.) Rather, Town Hall Brewery will simply be filled with neighborhood families enjoying each other's company and the revitalization of our neighborhood....and increasing property values. Hope it Happens! Sara and Jason Kaufman 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: james westin om> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:33 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: rezoning at 4500 Valley View Rd To Whom it may concern, I am a homeowner at 4501 Garrison Lane, about a block from the proposed zoning change. I just wanted to say that I support the proposed change as proposed under case file#2016.013. My wife and I are excited with the proposal for the new bar/restaurant and believe that it would be a wonderful addition to the local community. James and Ellen Westin 4501 Garrison Lane 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Trish Kolkman Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 4:23 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Town Hall Brewery We are the residents of 6009 Fairfax AV. We whole heartedly support the plans of Peter Rifakkes and Town Hall Brewery. We believe this to be a perfect addition to our neighborhood and welcome their fine establishment. Trish and Rick Kolkman Jackie Hoogenakker From: Carol McDonnell Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 2:54 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Town Hall Brewery I was at their meeting several weeks ago. Very complete information. My family and I are very excited for them to join our neighborhood. No one at the meeting that I spoke to had any worries or concerns. Plenty of parking. I don't foresee traffic issues. When can we make reservations? CJMcDonnell 4609 W. 62nd St. 924- 9424 Thank for considering my note.cm Jackie Hoogenakker From: Patrick Shane ,_-'Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 4:02 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Subject: 2016.013 -Town Hall Brewery Sir or Madam— I have recently received a public hearing notice for the case file referenced above. As a resident living within 1000 feet re-zonin I am writingto provide myviews on the matter. In general, I am supportive of the of the proposed g, introduction of the Town Hall Brewery establishment into the area. However,the city and the proprietors of Town Hall Brewery should take all appropriate measures to ensure there is(a) sufficient parking within established parking lot areas (i.e. no customer parking overflow onto Fairfax Ave or other surrounding streets) and (b) a reasonable limit to the operating hours. With regards to the item (b), sound carries easily and bar patrons and/or music must not disturb the existing homeowners, especially later at night. Should you wish to discuss further, I can be reached at I Thank you, Patrick R. Shane 1 • Jackie Hoogenakker From: Kristine Smyth <kristinesmyth@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:14 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Town Hall Brewery I am very opposed to having this business on the corner of Valleyview and Wooddale. This is a residential neighborhood. I am concerned that there will be an issue with parking on side streets. As you know since the city decided to narrow Kellogg and Oaklawn Avenues cars have a difficult time passing each other anyway when going opposite directions if there are parked cars on the streets. Also, the junction of Valleyview, Oaklawn and 62nd is terrible during high traffic times. This will just create more traffic on Valleyview which will make it even more impossible to make a left turn onto Valleyview during these times. I am also concerned about noise. This area is such a family area with Pamela park just 2 streets over, really one more establishment that sells alcohol? Is that really needed in a residential neighborhood?Thank you. Please turn this rezoning down. Kristine Smyth 6121 Oaklawn Ave. 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Doug Nelson <dnelson@theminikandaclub.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 5:33 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Town hall brewery My wife and I are 100%in favor of something like this to go into that space.This neighborhood needs an adult place that we can walk to. Great idea. Thanks for asking for our input. Doug and Jenny Nelson 6117 Oaklawn Ave Sent from my iPad 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Judy Reishus <jreishus@bkrdsn.com> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 3:42 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 2016.013 Dear Peter, This note is in response to our receiving the public hearing notice for the Rezoning variance for the Town Hall Brewery. We live at 6017 Fairfax Ave and purchased our property in '94. We are very supportive of this project and feel that the skeleton of Wally's needs an establishment like this to bring vibrancy back to the corner. Our kids grew up going to the "candy store" (the grocery store that used to reside in the strip mall), Clancy's on the corner, Corelli's pizza, etc. and we miss these establishments. Bringing back restaurants and relevant retail is a big win and is viewed as progress. Judy Reishus 1 f Jackie Hoogenakker From: Kevin Donegan <kev42day@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 9:54 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Olena Donegan Subject: 2016.013 -4500 Valley View Rezoning I live with my family at 6104 Oaklawn Avenue, which is within 1000 feet of the proposed restaurant. My wife and I are in full support of the application and are looking forward to the neighborhood improvement. The current situation is an eye-sore and we believe the concept restaurant being proposed would fit in well with the neighborhood and offer nice options for those within walking distance. Best Regards, Olena and Kevin Donegan 6104 Oaklawn Avenue (203) 524-2870 i Jackie Hoogenakker From: Greg Woodfill <greg@gregwoodfill.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 4:22 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Town Hall Brewing Dear City of Edina, we are residents at 6004 Kellogg Ave and received a letter asking for input on rezoning the gas station on Valley View Road for Town Hall Brewing to move in. We have a unique perspective as we recently moved from the Minnehaha neighborhood of Minneapolis to Edina in June. Town Hall Lanes was located a few blocks away from our old house and helped to revitalize the area around 50th St and 34th Ave. They were respectful neighbors and transformed an old, decrepit eysesore (a rundown bowling alley) into a great family restaurant and anchor of the neighborhood. We'd be happy to have them in the Pamela Park neighborhood. My only concern is increased traffic down Kellogg and Oaklawn Ayes, which have no sidewalks and already have a decent amount of traffic during rush hour trying to bypass the 4 way stop at Valley View Road and Wooddale Ave. There are also a lot of families, including my own, that walk down Kellogg Ave to Pamela Park or up to the shops at Valley View and Wooddale. It would be nice to have some kind of traffic slowing/diversion in place if Town Hall brings in more traffic to the neighborhood. Thank you for your time hearing our concerns, -Greg and Amanda Woodfill • Jackie Hoogenakker From: losteraas@comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 2:11 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Fw:Yes for Town Hall Brewery My wife and I think it is a great idea to make the old Wally's gas station into a restaurant at 4500 Valley View Rd. GREAT location for a restaurant. Wally's eye sore needs to get replaced. Town Hall Brewery does a good job running their other restaurants and they will do the same if not better in Edina. I have lived on the corner of Ashcroft Ave and Valley View Rd for 37 years and it's about time we see some nice changes for the neighborhood. Larry & Susan Osteraas 1 Jackie Hoogenakker - From: J M Schedin <schedvi@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 10:13 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 4500 Valley View Road - Preliminary Rezoning with Variances Mr. Teague, I am writing to you today to express my opinions concerning the proposed rezoning with variances related to the 4500 Valley View Road property. For the sake of transparency I need to reveal that I was a member of the Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan. SII As a resident whose home is situated approximately 300' feet from the strip mall parking lot, I had some questions and concerns about the proposed rezoning and redevelopment. I had the opportunity to meet with the proponents during their open house and was able to ask those questions and have my concerns addressed. After speaking with the proponents, I feel comfortable in supporting the rezoning with variances for the Town Hall Station concept. I feel that the business will help to reinvigorate our neighborhood and am mostly convinced that the issues of noise, traffic, light glare and parking will be negligible. Sincerely, Jim Schedin 1 '''. -.:'v. . '*,:::,,,--' :,- \ 4 il ie.:. .. R.. ''''YT .., 4 . �. lir 141,,,...-' - , 4., t co O p r4 _?' 1111111: g * �' :. ._ I! :. _ A _ ., i I �. "" , :. ....„....... ., ...„.,..i.i.- ,., . " .. A A .3..... RUINATION..} A 1111 4;40 1 r fy . e N.. -, vii 1011 - y #, • I . '4,41 , -I, , _-- --‘41, .... t * ! Alm , m 0 DJ Il 10 C/I 0 ig c H °° rNo 0C z ra Do rZ3On ri , Ir. , 4, 1 rillf'' :45:I; ,. 1 • • Town Hall Station Exterior Rendering 0 Restaurant & Bar i Edina MN • , ,4, 40.0. TOWN HALL , " --„,. . p; .'••••• . '. 11Z....V.. 11- :4,:-.111:: n-'7111.71..::."..."11:.•-**•• '''• /h. 4 iir: . .. ;al. dth.‘4. PI j."..:,41S1 :11.10: S1' k - . :. _ --,e;$41%.„.., 7(..: . Ile, 4 4 . . . A 1 .. ..• 4 4 4 •. 1 • ' 4 I* i ILA., I . . ' . -; % .'' . .4 . .. , ,,, .6,9 me , • • 4, ; fgll• ,ak . ' 1 . '• - . . • . •; • , .t.' V ' t.• . V• - -;- :,4 .y,. •• ..111,....7,:i.: iv.. .. . .. _ . .r•,,,.; . • - -e. ,,, " v AFL'. . -.I.:' - ,=.1 .,,,ef. *' ' t;44,1;" '• ir • . '". %. 'a ths •,.,,• tir' `-- ..ft,..-2114-ei . .. 4 ,o....i V' 1".• 6.: %C. ......C.Ak• . •• '.4".:.e '.-• P",11k 111114. 'fi.i. , ....:- ,... , • ,... .....ii 1 k.,11)' 1.,t. I 11;4 24i,,,. * 0 A . ir. 'II" 4.. ' .,,. k I,. TION .t.. . .w .„, .t. :Nli,, I,* . X 4; ..4t. .. ;......,... ,........ .4,.. . , •. , .... . ,.. ... ,. .. .., - ' - ,, 4. .4:11 . ' il..." •Ii 1:1P,k, ..., .. 4, •. , •1, • .7111, P ';'.14 . 1 I i VI. . i.4:7.-`" %,ir_.1 ik 1 . It . . ... P. ., • ... ••• '''. • , :c.....".• .. ,.•_xi -•,' ;7 _- • '1- .4, .:2! , 44..4 • -, - 4 Inikr 111+1. • I. -•• *•••) '- ' ;! ' ''-•.' k Hrn't ..4)? '''' ;i e ,. "r. a ' , ... •...,. ...el,...s..iik.: • ' :-...54 ...r. . • • ..• . ' 1' t ' r • - ••••- 4/ r., ..,',. '1'.-. .. . ,,,,,e,„. ..••I-.,L'- ..,:to. ,• , ..!\•... i e,i-..1 . . le c ........, .,.'. .1•••-• • ..0 - % • y •• , 0.7 .• x-rii f...., .-... . ii. A • ...-4 ',...i!.....-...,•-‘4,,w. -. .17,-. , .., -1 •., iCs,„, .. . I& ,_.. 1§. I ,.. . ,ii 94,-.... ..10, C.• . dir, ., '' 1.,\N ..., , • •-AO* .. 40. . ... AI!nil*1. ".. ;.f '..1." :f• V; '' • . * • " • •,k,...op -• t. ' -..u. 414.. ''. 11•4444.1`.f* . N''•• . . - ,-.•... -,, .4.- a =-,.."•-;.%..k.,... „ ,, . 1 .., MS, • _i . %.".11.f •-•' ' 'It' 4 .I‘ • ... . ',- 4-: - . - r..,;4 - -' , 1 . . _ ').• I . . .4r ' •!. *,%.• Nk 1,7.....:: , 1,i-rdril '' -- ..-ii .'...• ,... _ - ,, . . . -411. , --i- . .40,',1'.`•.47:'-''.- .* . ' • • • ..„ ,.. te" 14.. ...2 . 1-.. .iii, ,.{... , ..., ; ''AV .• .- '1,,' w... 8' - vl I..' • , - - - 17":„..%1:-.,ii::A.• -: 64 • -, 4...,...„, ,- ,•. t ...% .:,...., JP' .., „.' . 111.! 4Z./ ^^ :. -. I?i • ,i vp r osivit140,4 s' ihoom11111 111•111414100 ss .... .. .,.' ... 114111-. .s: • ':'' ' 1 .4.-4116".. •-.: ..mi 4 i 4-`11.:,,,,.... , rh . ;•:".17'i.'."r''' ' *' ii OW I i • lAil P-. II . ' f# it'../.', .4....., k• ,tir -4.0 . ...i ..,..,.. ./..-.,. .„dv.„,... ,.k., . Ji ,,, .fir‘. •_ 0.1Lai„,, , ' •A.LP•,1 • . • . ''4 1-t-•". ' ‘" -4"--1. t'-'" • 0 • • - :'. 4 6. :lit%0;•§'4.%,' . .'" . -. - `',Vg....N. . .. - 0 • MAD di 6 b' . WM, BEER otpie - • • . • ..• , • - - .U.4:14 •3:1..-: , r tto 4 t NMI 11111 MCI -..lk 1- J 4'g.1.*'0.37. f'77-'•;#:' ' P. .1, $7 r'',I,1 a 1.,1. ' •' IIIIMIIIIIIIIIIr.'''. - '4W61.41:$33111ti:H.' ' • 4 ... .... ',... • ' . ' . :ST§.11,1 ' ....., ' '• .‘,... 4;Y:it;:• - ..-'• ..., ' '''NVI,X4, • .1) ,,, C ...... ?H‘Cr..*:'..•. ..,,,I,.'7;r.' t 'A.- J',...... ....V.A4\-°'‘. •.>•' ":''', ' . '.:./ '- - - •• •• / I'..' 40.00.00.1.1.1111111r 1 • ., 411. ,;.rIG k vommimr.4 -ir• . Im...4k.•,-rhotile.'...".A.•.',i,i,... . INNIMINI - = • -.4,,. '..,:-.-- 1 4 i V.':. ..: 7 ;•:.':' 1 . ,.''.'.... Al8 175b.-;'''ifr ' • ' • - • ‘...-:-'•."11114 ' r wi: .,.. .. •!, •• - ...,.,,,- . .. ... , •-x. ..,- , .... :;‘,..-1110: . . 010-• "'mf -"..' . '...-,-c .A, -- -. - . • f it#164, *, r 11 I.. .• r . IC'.r.11.' rer,.. ••40 . f. 2 . V)g.. • - • _. ii..--:*°*Ir- le. .7.....„:„ „.., . , ,,.., ...... .. ....... .„ ,.. ., . :,..,.. .. ... 1, ...„, , _ . .._ . _,, .. 4. ,, t7,a, , • ....... , 4,1:';' l'F'`` •:-.4111. c'v '1.:_. -^ ,, . _ , -,.. . .• .. .• ID .....r ... . .. ..• • ..k.,.t. 7 :':.-...•.* • .-...`,::,...• N.., el 1 i .., , 4. 0 ' ' • A ,. . *. : _ ',f•' .. IIIM I .1, 1.4. ''• Ilk ...... 1 -- .;...,..--" -. ... , „WI,'' "V* . .• .',Ali- •• ' ' - '' ,, - "' g * ' 4"air 4414P Vi '' -.4-ir ':' . . ,.. -7 ,, - • lite- - -,..f. .1111,*. 1.04.- . . , ,•;• ., .• . . IllE„.„ '' * - • . ,,,- ..,...A.ki• ''', ,s-ori.*.' .'''''- ... aiki.„---=' .„,„,1 • c„ . . iir...4.. ,• • • 4, 444 ' . .• - , .1-47-1"11. . . lir . ..'A- •••1 .'t• . a As . .7.f ,.. . _ ilk 3 - ' _ ., ,t, - • I * ,... , , 1.-• .0;• ' .,, , , .. 4,,..._ •• - . :•, to. „. . ......, .... i ,- ,•- .. .... , -- ...• . :,' .,. ,, . • . I ... ' It '•fler.", ‘" . 1; . ,- '1;?" Vi • •!"-,.tor; - . ' , . . .,.... , .. . . I ,., -, •-__: ' - --..„ Iiii 4 7,•-.. • ., • .. . ..,,` i ' , • .,.`!' '., :-..... . . . -- -- -, - i I - .., . . •••••r•-` - . „ -1. - • ...... 14 _ , . I 7.:-,;., •...!--r--- , ' • ' • . • • .4 a - - 7;>''''''': ' 0110'' ''N'‘.,„. 7, '' . . . .... s -.- ' - ... . .. ., . - • ,.. ,„.- . " .. ..... , „, , ,. • .. . „.,7..... . . . ,. . shea 57'-71/4" A 16 south Eighth sheet / / Minneapols.MN 55402 18'-2" 23'-10" 15'-31/4" i4 / 1612 3332257 1612 3432930 N.---N- A ,I \ _ r PROPOSED 55 ,,,,m„ —ll 1, COOLER BOX CMl3RE GROUP JI ADDITION to 4931w.3sTI sr.sun Zoo Beer Cooler Prep/Office _ sr.vows PARK rut s5416 l \ �— Cooler/ PM : 1. ,ICXXXXICXXX)I . �' l�^ 4500 VALLEY MEW ROAD Mil _ II L[ EDINA,MN 55424 m Eii I IIIIII RR Corridor RR El O al al16 1' = WI I _ EN ism Amu 1 Ell Dining .� .. 4 40) I ATIDi :.: innnntnnni INI 1�� - E000 OCJC I - iii 1716,, a - i F -� •1111 • • • • E____ _ rill Temporary 0 I ! 1iII . •I� Hst = BMW ••• To-Go Counter - .� W '\ P, %!/ . U 01 IP 0 Patio -.. . . 0 0 W 1 t N OM . II) V \D . fl � ImoSeat Count: liDining 64 Bar 11 •■• 'MD �.■.. ... •■. .■. Indoor Total 75 •M• 11M• 111.• .1111•. 1111• I■• k Patio 66 4. NM e�' i T. a : A' X PETE RAFIKES \ Total Indoor+Patio 141 1430 WASHINGTON AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55454 44'-8"PATIO ZONING SUBMITTAL 2016.07.21 C A`\ 1 ,4144,44 44,4 7106.01 07/21/16 4 BMD GAB 1 FLOOR PLAN 1 A100 • shea T.O.RTU SCREEN 0 II I 119,-6" ® 10 South NM Streit M,nneut N MN 55002 II _ T O.WALL 0 I I 0 / 114-0" _.__--_-.-_ _-_ _ -1 1012339.2257 I.1-.--- -- 1 ' � 1812 349.2930 0 II I 49re9esiAn corn • . / SCREEN WALL ---___--_.. -- OWL SITE GROUP mit 1 ,1,1 I I'1�1 ,1 - I' 1 — — 109'-6" 4031 W.35111E ST.SUITE 200 I ST.LOUIS PAPS(.MI 55419 a. 0\ ----_--------__— — I 1 1 11 I I == I> -=-: _____ _ '------ LEVEL1, w... 100'-0" TOWN HALL STATION 4500 VALLEY NEW ROAD EDINA,MN 55424 1 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A101 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" T.O.RTU SCREEN -_ - 119'-6" 0 TO WALL / T.O. _0" $ 0 0 1 STATill ION 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I�� 0 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 — _ 11111111111 11111111111 i \ i \ / / / \,... 1 -_ LEVEL 1 02 100-0" 3 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A101 SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0" 0 T.O.RTU SCREEN I I II 0 119,-6" T.O.WALL di II 0n 114-0' ©II II II I I U U U All I II -- ', ' ti..1r "-- II 3 II --- ' _- PETE RAFIKES — —.-_ 1430 WASHINGTON AVENUE ._.__-_. . RM •\ =-_- F, MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55454 I_ I I I I I 1 ¢ ,` + LEVEL 1 __.. 0 O 0 O O 0 0 14 —166-T--111/7 — 2 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A101 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" () EXTERIOR KEY NOTES Keynote Revision Number Descritption Tracking e 0 T.O.RTU SCREEN 4,i 1 EXISTING PORCELAIN PANEL.REMOVE PAINT TO EXPOSE EXISTING PORCELAIN 4 ----__. ._ _--_---. _-----_-. -- - - -- --- — - -.-.-- — ___-_.. SURFACE BELOW. 118-6 2 EXISTING EYEBROW.REFURBISH TO'AS NEW CONDITION.REPLACE LAMPING BEHIND FRONT PANEL © 0T.O. 0114'0 O" 3 EXISTING BRICK,PAINT CHARCOAL GRAY ----�/ 4 NEW DOOR AND SIDELIGHT ZONING SUBMITTAL 0 / c) 0 5 NEW WINDOW p 2016.07.21 I U ll II I U I6 NEW COOLER BOX ADDITION — 0 - _ __ ..E.1-31:7-.:=74 7 MODIFY EXISTING CURTAINWALL SO THAT THIS PANEL IS OPERABLE ASA TO-GO — �� \- -- = r R REPLACE EXISTING OVERHEAD DOOR WITH NEW INSULATED GLASS OVERHEAD , 0 15 DOOR.REUSE EXISTING TRACKS IF POSSIBLE.REPLACE IF REQUIREDIu. =.----- l , 9 NEW CHARCOAL GRAY METAL WALL INFILL -- - -- — \ 10 EXISTING STOREFRONT TO REMAIN i• 1 -• __, --- _ _ __ //__ 11 EXISTING CM TO REMA AINT -- -- CHARCOAL GRAY = • .iviiSite TOWN HALL STATIONOR OUP 4931 W.35TH ST.SUITE 200 ST.LWIS PARK.MN 55416 CIv9SReGroup.00m Maa Pavek Pat Sarver ]6}21}3944 952-250-2003 EDINA MINNESOTA shea ENGINEERING & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANSCIVIL ,• ��: as 612.339.2267 worm corn ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTAL .,1 .,. .. ... . ,,,_ ., :. WS.. ..s I. s,,.«aa t a ..�� ; Z I , O Zcri Z e a�.1a ai i f ` .I wb,.., ~ Z a O i' « « • ~ w ~ w «.ba, T a I € CO OJ Z UJ Lu H..mn 4 m«;1 F 3 JLL T «esnw • A.001 N Z < 0 O Z. o U O v x • C.) o TS 1- SITE LOCATION w SITE LOCATION MAP © & a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MI ESOTA. SHEET INDEX M ew R.Pavek DEVELOPER/PROPERTY OWNER: MASTER LEGEND: SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE GATE 7/15/16 LICENSE NO.44263 TOWN HALL TAP 932 EX.1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL • PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM CTITLE SHEET O1 C0.1 SITE SURVEY ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 4810 CHICAGO AVENUE S „ EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN 7/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55417 • 939 PROPOSED 1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL C2.0 SITE PLAN SPOT GRADE ELEVATION(GUTTER/FLOW LINE Doll PROPOSED GATE VALVE C3.0 GRADING PLAN �9M15' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT C4.0 SITEBGRADING PLAN(NORTH) •. ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: 932.98C r 932UTC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BACK OF CURB(TOP OF PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY C5.1 DETAILS DETAILS CURB) C5.1 • CIVIL SITE GROUP ___0._ PROPOSED SIGN • ,. • 932°1W SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 4931 W 35TH STREETS PROPOSED LIGHT . SUITE 200 9]I°aW SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL >� PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH SIDE PLAN,NOTES,DETAILS ST LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 DRAINAGE ARROW ))� PROPOSED STORM SEWER SW1.0 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN-EXISTING CONDITIONS 612$15-0060 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW I PROPOSED WATER MAIN SW1.1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN-PROPOSED CONDITIONS REVISION SUMMARY EOF SW1.2 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLP.N-DETAILS DATE DESCRIPTION SURVEYOR: SILT FENCE LIMIT -_----. EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SW1.3 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN-NARRATIVE __ EXISTING STORM SEWER HARRY S.JOHNSON CO.,INC. � INLET PROTECTION 9063 LYNDALE AVENUE SOUTH EXISTING WATER MAIN . . BLOOMINGTON,MN 55437 STABLIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXISTING GAS MAIN GOPHER CALL 952$84-5341 .-.-.-.«-«_e_e_._._.- EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC WPHERPT STATE ON ONE CALL .aaa EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE (BW1252-1tee TOLL FREE TITLE SHEET GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: * SOIL BORING LOCATION (851)45'°°°2 LOCAL N/A _ CURB AND GUITER(T.O=TIP OUT) 'J EXISTING MANHOLE IL EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX MI ❑ EXISTING CATCH BASIN # EXISTING UGHT 1a EXISTING HYDRANT A EXISTING GAS METER O EXISTING STOPBOX M EXISTING GAS VALVE O O N EXISTING GATE VALVE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: (PIN: 19-028-24-34-0094) Lot 11, Block 1, Valley View Terrace 3rd Addition,Hennepin County, Minnesota except SAN.MH. Part of Lot 11,Block 1, ValleyView Terrace 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, ��6IMS88N.13 ep Y \ 6'SE INv=879. Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of _ 10'NW INV.=879J said Lot 11, distant 31.4 feet south point of curve; thence northwesterly w" line feet along 1a1 linet oif 1efeed wouldthintersect the northwesterlyrth \ ,, I line of said Lot 11 at a point 38.1 feet southwesterly from northerly corner of said Lot 11; thence southwesterly at right angles 80.07 feet; thence j \ p / y southeasterly at right angles to east line of Lot 11; thence northerly along _ �� .� " said east line to the point of beginning. ` / \ '<, Also excepting, 1 / \ eeesaax ,,''r, I Part of Lot 11,Block 1, Valley View Terrace 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, 4. 14j Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point in the 1,' / \ '' \ \ Py I northwesterly line of Lot 11,distant 38.1 feet southwesterly from northerly -..'/z' / T''- corner of said Lot 11; thence southeasterly 57.05 feet along a line if \ C/C'� extended would Intersect the east line of said Lot 11 at a point distant <.<i / \ 8890 �, \ /1,4 31.4 feet south from the point of curve; thence southwesterly at right SCALE: 1 INCH= 30 FEET y- / ,� < \ 'l ^ angles 7 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing southwesterly / ' \ ,%,tea \ L. along last described line 73.07 feet; thence northwesterly at right angles �'n .x Som x \ \ 68 feet; thence northeasterly parallel with northwesterly line of said Lot 11, / 74,'e "" ees z _ d a distance of 78 feet; thence southeasterly to the point of beginning. _.._._ / �° /0.I 4 �e 1\J'//L J ` J •Y Also excepting, / \ \ ^ . — — 065'OO The southerly 100 feet of the easterly 100 feet of Lot 11,Block 1, Valley IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM )p 1 h i o. 1�/ '(x�', /fie -'�\j f� J \_ 09. I c View Terrace 3rd Addition, Hennepin County,Minnesota. � O J ,�,.. op'aYM { -f 1 - �_— �m°o° �'x OF l"5 1,• �rp9 4$R 3,-,--,,_, ----- - � ) "\r 114rj e�j --890-'-- ''�, $ d,°t^ Part ofParcel 2LatP1N, Block 1, Valley VIew9Terrace 3rd Addition,Hennepin County, REVISIONS �'<�� - ro '. gek Sp\ '% "y �9 • _ % Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line of Date. \ �' \$ eeo..x er� I' �- cy�p�ry 9' q said Lot 11, distant 31.4 feet south point of curve; thence northwesterly • I a. .(1-.-,..44:14#4446:1„:: 6 54.6 feet along a line which if extended would intersect the northwester) ,y'\ Dao :1m_ Br7UM1N,,, ! Al 6 i m"°v 09 -'',mea 9 Y / e // _ _ �a ..."1-020.3 ,x ° line of said Lot 11 ata point 38.1 feet southwesterly from northerly comer \ .ye'.- e / �,. e r .k. v j "�mg',xy aA'.g. of said Lot 11; thence southwesterly at right angles 80.07 feet; thence b'x/. o° •,� �,..x/ '. , ex ��. . p9 southeasterly at right angles to east line of Lot 11; thence northerly along \ `' �i--.,"`A�1.yy/\ six--',, 0" said east line to the point of beginning. 1 � I i 'x` AK M.H. \ / eesa Ia ' e'FF / �_FF /// O'08 0 RIM=89101 Parcel 3: (19-028-24-34-0093) I' T-41 ��{�J" EL=890.81 r m'\ 1,,, x '•x o 10"INv.=87x.7Part of Lot 11•Block 1, Valley View Terrace 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, <7e \� FL /�. B17o.M 'S'- ( s Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point in the \ c EL=s9a.2o n q INpus (. •k",¢�, / 3og n> northwesterly line of Lot 11,distant 38.1 feet southwesterly from northerly \ (, /r' 1 �U'�'Nr°>P '-s7g4Ek EL=890.F96-J °.851.6 "��' corner of said Lot 11; thence southeasterly 57.05 feet along a line if ` 1 ,, r,�// _ G/S zp'Nr q pRK B, R / � extended would intersect the east line of said Lot 11 at a point distant / \\ l_r \ e /•: 5'TFr N' s 88c'lO EL=991.10 0 5q@ �) 31.4 feet south from the point of curve; thence southwesterly at right / / \ o '\ ///j / NE�oNrr So'.i. _ 1 ,�, angles 7 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing southwesterly \ .a 9a� FF 4r 8/ EL=891.01 LIJ, along last described line 73.07 feet; thence northwesterly at right angles "0 5 o ''°o EL=890.52 rg PaN7 / n u, 68 feet; thence northeasterly parallel with northwesterly line of said Lot 11. \1, ' '•b\ ro. fi o / FF xllees a distance of 78 feet thence southeasterly to the point of beginning. a�/ '''''-ie., Ry ////// EL=89a.5a ,-..,- I fie, z� hereby certify that this curve (�• �. to ro \ I Y Y Y• plan or 1O1 �^` \ rAt S q �j .R es," I `°9 I Parcel 4: (19-028-24-34-0091) report was prepared by me or under my r(\) I I \ �' a {/" L.IJ Li-J Southerly 100 feet of the easterly 100 feet of Lot 11,Block 1, Valley View direct supervision and that am a duly x Id gess \seg •,00 •:-...i.....4.9.$ t` T m —Di Terrace 3rd Addition,Hennepin County, Minnesota. Registered Land Surveyor under the laws / 883 2% y l — of the State of Minnesota l \ n ¢ "P4R • ' / / 9.\ LIJ / \�� I*/ zo �x 4.�. 4O�iZ''-,(•,) J\`'• /NCi -; 80.0 o{" ',,c� :-.,,i ' h <, / %� ,1,_ \ ^'•`^/:: a`O„� e° J\ / <L Thom Hodorff. L.S. -- ^7 1 ��r 7 4P e\ Minnesota Reg. No. 23677 ,_� I y1y(M��' \--I-��c�o 667_, ,\ s/ , xe°9> e. '. $J 652 Ar ,I rV'/ 1 \ ° . 'S P9R. 690 I LIsJ 7,,‘" Date: June 29.2016 / L2 L / os ( # � Y.\ NC\T S�flp Bi>p\ ° aa• /ea,_' J LIJ — - 5 ` ej'•^\ 111](/\ <° � sir x887.3 665 ,� �'\\\ \ � C `r BOUNDARY 6�4�\(t 66��a. 07 S a /NOUS �a3 %. "n �c \ - C 1 / T AND \� a \\ Ba' / .. + e I r 160'0 -�g9a –' l A � TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY t g a te%, `:\ `` x/ y , °aei / 23.4 .+ r m p. / e \ ,� w `� I q [ , \ p. 1 °j/////��4456 30.4 r. _t -� m [/ / BI7U ,Si e �c V 2-. .:� /q/ R`�f1'C�l g"` ", /4500,V t nuI VIEW,4a0�'°\ �� MINOUS 'b /,e ------.j'--- \. \B 'Y' ��/// rACC. r\ 1 STOR 9JLDIN��tSF 5 \ jeep' For: `\ �`\ "�\ \\ \„-1,i e` ii�� 00'�e,e�s Bim!-.......),-,>,. ...R,&,,,,,,,, 3�'�^�:aa�±�\sq V c / // / �� \BB l\\ I\ 1 j/N5//,%%C/ a 1;\_5N . '*c� _ / { 0� aei.=�a�-- ` �` >-,,,y, \ I 4' _ , O� d _-MONITOR WELL 1111 CIVIL SITE I \ �o / � _ \ t l ( `� ya'\ /� ELEV.=891.00 a I m 0 00 , -`�m \ \ EL-``Y�411'g"0N *' _J A > =_FF `+ �.. \ ��� EL=89 N\ HSJ BENCHMARK ` \ \ , B3 �` \\ BIrU�\/M ;�,°r aeB.x xa° / �__ TOP OF NAIL ` ` `\ \ \ (`/ /{ /0 �t\9 B��\ , \\ MJ�p,.3 !J 8 �_eg9 �e \ ELEV.=890.28 \ \ y--.,IL\S r�\ _BNA >,,,--.2„,, --m- 1.--tom' Vr \'�,/ m`'\ �' /\ I '/r-II �� ' \ \aa `sae, e4. x' \{ 1 m C.B. LEGEND , \ v /,-Y'}-/ \ \ -RiM=888.14 et'C Rl0Hr, 00`\Vic. //..1-,I-jr- J/`a .77-77-I',....,:„. \\ '• �0q9 12'INV.=884.7 • Property Corner SITE: \ Wq \`/�,� ,bes..x 1� > ee,,\ \ , ,� 1 \ \a \ l( .le �' Concrete Curb q s a a. SAN.M.H. 4500&4506 VALLEY VIEW ROAD p 1 L ' ,-t \\ s\ a'''',1'-_,„_._-_,---944' .r 3"5�\ Jon- '¢0 31M-888.36 Fence L'L� f 1,7C-1,4, \ °', _x-881 sezzx` -a 0�a ® 0 10 1Nv.=880.0 --w Overhead Electric es see y 1 \ \ J x — - Underground Electric L Kk TY''� \ c , aez.n e o° C_B. ____ —_w_x Underground elephone 'C-h'l1 \ \ r� - ° _ RIM-888.08 __u a— Water R J — ,-1,_,L'..-:J� q, •ee m b J e —„<— Sanitary Sewer Gas EDINA,MINNESOTA \'\ \ ,2 2 0 12”NW INV=884.1 \ ' J' ( J 15"SE INV.-884.1 Y �l O m /�44tp O ----„. Storm Sewer GENERAL NOTES: \ /9,40,,v:-.'4,,, =0 'a m' OO Electric Meter \ ., , v\ ?Jros,, / \ ID Electric Box HENNEPIN COUNTY 1.The bearing system used Is assumed. \ °B1 \ O Electric Manhole MONITOR WELL / \ \-\ II \ \ 0 PowerPole 2.The n of the underground utilities shown hereon.If any.are approximate - \ 6 �°" \ Hydrant ly.PURSUANT TO MSA 2160 CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(612) 6 II { ELEV.=888.95 6x� ¢ 454-0002 PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. \ d \ \ ee7.wc 0 Gate Valve O Guard Post 3.Subject property 1s identified as being In'Zone X.Other Areas'on Flood MONITOR WELL__% \ -� �\ 5B Catchbasin Insurance Rate Map No.,27053C0364E,effective date September 2,2004. ELEV.=689.33 \ _ a \--,e----,---,,;/ 0/ ® Catchbasin '�,J ° 65 Air Conditioning Unit 4.Total site area-85.275 square feet s 1.958 acres. \'='_` ° Ba/ 1 Site area Parcel 1=54,914 square feet=1.491 acres 1 \BB 6A 6 Deciduous Tree(Dia. in In.) Site area Pared 2-5,634 square feet-0.129 acres. fie, / HARRY S.JOHNSON CO. INC Site area Parcel 3-3,925 square feet-0.090 ac }v Site area Parcel 4-10.802 square feet_0.248 acres I 9/.\m Coniferous Tree(Dia. in in.) LAND SURVEYORS 5.This survey was made on the ground. \•BBS \' * Light Pole 6.No current tine work was furnished for the preparation of this survey Legal o x s 0 Gas Meter 9063 Lyndale Avenue South description,recorded or unrecorded easements and encumbrances are subject to ei Telephone Manhole Bloomington,MN. 437 w resion upon receipt of rent title current mirk. aSanitary Manhole Tele.952-884-5341 Fax 952-884-5344 Storrs Manhole 7.Elevation datum le based on NAW 88 data. -----906----- Existing Contour www.hsjaurveyors.com 100.000(NAW 88)m,99.814(NGW 29) X 851.270 Existing Spot Elevation Gutter chmark is located Top of Nall(AS SHOWN ON SURVEY) X 934.3 Existing Spot Elevation Devotion-890.28 30 15 0 30 60 90 ea°" F"°No _---- 843 1-3-9028T SCALE IN FEET R2 WO.Number CT 2016309 Sleet Na. 1 OF 1 ,:\'°s abs. n \nwc imisk - N �i 46-'- :0,..ie' I � X C/ /11' 889.5: - 0,0 II ,`',c' X aso. '► Gy do ciyij.site 0°- k�o EROSION CONTROL NOTES: u P s '"...,.....1 \1 \ 1 �89�- ', 'i<)- \ 0A 4931W 35TH ST.SUITE 200 6---- 2,.i.,•,„,..• 5?.-15- / '...� ` �\`� X e '�;+ c.y ,O B9 Q SEE SWPPP ON SHEETSSWt.OSW1.3 ST.LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 mg�i ;v) 1' I \`•�.__ \890 sp o, ,is'1O ( 945 �y0t9 _ 0,Q 0. CivilSitNGloupcom \'� +\ x'40 i ry 1\,et- '2 X. 'L.'. y 134 ,' O„ \ x /-x- 63.2133944 952-250-2003 JPat Server 32. - 890.4X 89 . ,41 •!• `V 6 ,(�`:•.885 'L`DV o�A ,.:1-c..., \- .9 Bobo,OU 11.• CT/ '2,' N •% �� 9i -> _/ 4///.2 9<p =�-•�. •• ►`/`I; ,,,�; X ,T� es, ( shea • v / / 150. 00----- 0,...i,,, \ D.B xe \� _�� ' v/ I; 0 Yc SAN. M.H. �/ FF ► ai° ,fl d'or 1 REMOVE ALL '9i RIM=891.01 ' ss 0' INV.=874.7 /O EL=890.81 , ...-.9a9 i ry( P. S BASE % 2�X p EL=890.20/nom 10 South 0111 Street 4 1 el TOM/N°OS eA` .,a v ..N $U/CD/rye STPRN Bi.SlORyY 1/f,, EL=890.96 J I ,fig `g751.6• � �1 `'!'e9/c / � • 20.5 FFFT y e 1s 8/IVGOAD EL=891.10 p so c 0 4'6 \ M I a yelGy• T/q TQ' Fr FF__ op \ I I No 4,',5�/ FF Ty/ EL=891.01 -.4 i REMOVAL NOTES: S / 6 p / j --EL=890.52 PO//VT = , 9p� jiff I' 1. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP)PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER \ S 1. r__ 90. X� I •���JJJ / ,9?� / MANAGEMENT PLAN. o a 0 /��j EL-890.54 0'+ r7: I• ��^ I1' o f 0 • /6 4"'� 3 , m:' . •9'J /�p. 'I� R€RCU PRO„CTc 2. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT,STATE AND Q M M 0 CeQ/ \/ y I LOCAL REGULATIONS. S , Q� CI) - r-4111.. • F 0U L I� ° • �. 1 ^ { 3. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION \\ \\ S / ,t.) STR T =� ACTMTIES. 6e 0�`` Sa 2/ P� Q • j 9� 0 • 4. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR TIE NEAREST 8 P j :90.6"� )I ( / JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. \\\ e`9• 0�'� ''`\ M. 4 y. - O• \ ' EMOVE ALL ,I G ey 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFFSITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH I/ 1 °S nj PAVE BASE , I TRANSF ER TOR,/ I I STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS r /{/\ P,qR / 8 TTT�� `/ REMAIN,P TECT c 1sn / \ /N \\ / - 80.G \ ! Z 6. ABANDON,REMOVAL,CONNECTION,AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE ��J T 1 ' THROUGH UT Z to / '7-: \- \ G Sr-9 \\ +/ ---r-- _ \ �� I w 3 , TRU ON > APPROXIMATE.COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. \ 0 /s •, % , 9°. Ic C�7 Q I e9 7. EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE O Z Z -.e. 'r 89 \r/ ".�w. EXISTI ES DURATION OF THE CONTRACT - 2X�NC.,_,.) .V `J �,� \ N ���E.Fi�I.��y/�I REMAIN, TE ' r Q 0.. \ � �` o it 4'�' ,•, THROUGH v B. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMBS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON . IA 9,,.. ----- 4 �""' - CONSTRl1C ON I,,/_ ° THE DRAWINGS.WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, Q Z Xe ,. \\ X e-P 7 �'' x89 //D"- •���� ;�'A�!� 7 \� AO / DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. I. I-0 5 Q d \\ B \ °? %V/ 4 J 9� �°j~/ 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE •C/� r W •-?, jr, ,, is P R \\ / 00a 890 ��j�+r� I\ �_/ PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. y Q J Z \ q lNG '/ I\ \ , / L..1_..] 10. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A 0 J 4p, 1 • Tq Q/T \ 0,0• // r2 / fli r MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. Q 2 S� 9•R // 0 8? Tn X 'or• / Op ___I 11. PROPOSED WORK(BUILDING AND CML)SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE LU I Ly �4Y1� A/C \ � \ \ , / � O SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. � � N N q� • \ �' - y 2 • �� Q 12. SITENGANDTY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED INAMANNERTO TIOOFTVANDALISM,IWDTHEFT, T >- Z W X887 3 -1.9 �S' ��A�� I 4, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS,THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.SECURITY i LU > \ 6 / / r^, MATERW.S SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. Z O O X0-65 /jM/IV \, e6a• 9" 'l I ' rf f��'�/ �,,,' I 9�� 13. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY APD INSPECTION ACCESS DURING > (/S X88 - I / NORMAL OPERATING HOURS.AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL o Q .,\ 0 ' d" " 1,/,'' %_/ ; OI8�O� CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO 1.0 =-, v. \ ' I �10 /// ' / I YOB CONSTRUCTION ACTNITIES. O VU \ * 0 \ r S.O •�� / .e O 14. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE `\ \ 88 / i M 23.9 �. �1 ' 'FC // ? MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES(MMUTCD)AND THE CITY.THIS SHALL r\ 8 , ��'�i' INCLUDE,BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO,SIGNAGE,BARRICADES,FLASHERS,AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED.ALL Co\\ / //// 4) 6f► SFJ�� O PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES.NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE � PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CIN. $� / 0�0 VALLEY VIEW STD w ,../,c 7/7-41/7-7--/ 9 l'\ /' A M�'9'�:�.�,.fiElI . ,ry� /N d/ /�% II 15. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS /-_,,%,,,.._ r 0/ /FOO "=t. L1.,CZ S.F. ,e� % I 'tc -,C4 APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. x 80.9X r4' rl� . + �� 1"°j 16. STAGING,DEMOLITION,AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE 88 _, / 57 5�,/ /�,'• t e /do: - DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CRY. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUN. 7.\8 v\ \ 19101101,00,70/7#77.041,041.40.4,46 -r 0000��C ��� `/ - SPECIFICATION.OR REPORT WAS \ �/ PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MV DIRECT y / LICENSED(ON AND THAT I PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 6'6 REMOVE SALVAGE.; ���•.A �b,� 4:40t"' r'' �1 \ I �° MONITOR WELL A DULY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF Is `86.6s EXISTIN,LIG1400 • r 10 �f# floe, 00�\ / ELEV.=891.00 CITY OF EDINA REMOVAL NOTES: MI EOFTA / -y \6. AND-XTURE,TM. �,l`•tyl 1 F... o.B.r_ d -., e i `�--`4• \ ' \ ��?olVe••gr wed' .��\I \ 8`9 HSJ BENCHMARK 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. �$-5 -----=---•:. �o-��� '' s , /)tge.,70," •• . ,: , w i 3c' TOP OF NAIL M eWR.Pavek 883.9 ' �_�186 ♦ „.,,.r,� .. :� --p / f0 �\ •I, ti, � �, %•.� 4� z ELEV.=890.28 ogre 7nsn6 CENSE NO.44263 !\ - , Nr;N_.��,rlr.I.✓.i • A/� g I 1 b`2)°`'- 885.9 �� .!1`y \ / \ �,,,� ('' I' "- ' ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY ae5. �� `,A�{� • 9) DATE DESCRIPTION�' \ - '� / m C.B. 71,81,6 CITU SUBMITTAL V 02 �/� M=888.14 :a.9sd ( \�� I / REMOVALS LEGEND: BBC1 �\ asssa \I T \ A' 12 INV.=884.7 /Gil \ X8 // /� - 932 DC 1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL •. ` -::3.29G\ yT OF es \ , .4,"W. ,7 ��Q /0 - . W ,� 00 \ / AND ALL BASE MATERIAL \ A '886.43G . �' /47 REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT x) -"W. 417 REMOVE SALVAGE - \ FPS \ ' ,. I.' ' �4 INCLUDING BR.,CONC.,AND GRAVEL PVMTS -.S •��"f♦�j♦ SAN. M.H. ^••D• REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL:84,77G \ S6, 'i, 806.94 �..,,! "y ♦ttio♦♦4��4 ._ - �`•� ♦ � � ,goa sp AND FIX -rIX l RIM=888.36 !♦��t•�•t•�•�♦���•�♦�4 FOOTINGS AND FW NDAT IONS. \ s' --_" 1- Yee 2. 4.•-,-.;,-AO + �: ® 0" INV.=880.0 - �,♦ REVISION SUMMARY �� `\ -� \ �'6eSF �\\\ �•) X� /v/ 887.37 ♦ �� / d' 0 -__ C.B. DATE DESCRIPTION R \._:,,,V 1 ::::I:UDINGTSANDS 88=8841=884.1 • • \ \ p 6 / % c3 p I \ \\ • ea7.tac NM/NON \\\ �O S moi. 1 BSf 85G \ REMOVALS PLAN • ' \ \_\ 1 )\ \\ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL MONITOR WELL__; S \ \ Bey \ WYVWGOPHERSTATEON ECALL ORG �Q ,z (800)252-1168 TOLL FREE ELEV.=888.95 \ �e\`\x i 1' ab7.44GX z N51)454-0002 LOCAL t =20'0 .O \ __` 1 Tp k,InNITOP WFI I 87.36G �`-� �, T�� W 00® d / SITE PLAN LEGEND: Ci v iiSite �o• '■. GRoIEP � ■, MATCH EXIST. ST LO 3STMST.MN 5541611 CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPEGFIED(PAD OR WALK&/7.� ' IVO —--— ) ST.LOUIS PARK.MN 55416J00 CIVIISIteGmuPwm — PROPERTY LINE Matt Pevek Pat Sarver t11111O 763-213-3944 952250-2003 M/NWMT.MALK,TVP. I m CURB AND GUTTERSEE NOTES �� O\ I ( - ---T (T.O.)TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLK:ABLESEE PLAN \ LOCKABLE DOORS TO MATCH FENCE,TYP. I S < CL\ TRANSITION TO Bfi12 CBG n 1 `/ TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROWS she a i li 12. \ RIBBON CURB,TYP. ON STONE �!'_, \ CONC.PNMT.TYPSEATWAILS,TYP.�© \ SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY.SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. ^amsem'd iI 8 CONC.PAD I / HC=ACCESSIBLE SIGN / , ECORATIVENP=NO PARKING FIRE LANEa s�PPPCEDAR FENCE ST=STOP • M itI '. NM �.■�� �.�j %OPAQUE I II CP=COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY e1z�aia:2is7'"e°° `.55403spn corn J i �■��� MAT .�.,. .<G I/,■ ■ a �,,��, 11111 10 0 a® SITE LAYOUT NOTES: �I . ; I 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO R,,b ��' III ■. �_ rilliT§ ���' 1 BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED T0,LOCATIONS OF EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PED. 0' I AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES,EASEMENTS,SETBACKS,UTILITIES,BUILDINGS AND 1 ■ ` PAVEMENTS.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS /�� -_. Emu � RAMP,�' ' ' FOR THE SITE.ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, r .1� r -- - \ DE '-TINE CO DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO m �' OWNER.ADJUSTMENTS TOTHE LAYOUT SHALL INSTALLATION D BY THE � C a C.PNMT."' LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS.STAKE 0 IllCITY '''r..'.TYP.s LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. i (7)GALV.STEEL ST 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, 1r 1111111. PLANTERS,PROVIDE PLANTING �!!�G 0 ^ �,I INCLUDING ARIGHf-0E-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. i ■ SOIL FOR HERBSNEGETABLES ; ■ 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECI*/ICAL IIE IN CONG/PVMT.M TYP �� REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. '�' (6)GROUND MOUNTED I 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE 'HITCHING POST' , CONC.pV BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE STYLE RACKS " TYP , n PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. CAS STEPS CONC. DECORATIVE CONC.PVMT. /III ' ' . I f0 STIePS 6CE RAILS,SEE , DECORATIVE CONC.PNMT. 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES,ROADWAY PAVEMENTS,CURBS AND GUTTERS,BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD,PRIOR TO Z DETAIL MI. , . _-- I, INSTALLATION,FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEERMNDSCAPE ARCHITECT. Z L0 77_ 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB.BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE O • e , ��__ii � ■ OFCONCRETEFOUNDATION.LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION ANDA, y1� 1I _ SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. < Id. J B612 CBG '-' y 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR - O �. ■ - _ _ �_.-. U II REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEERMNDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO `�` W Q Q FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS,BUT f W 0 I , I ` r I NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING,FURNISHINGS,PAVEMENTS,WALLS,RAILINGS, �/� 0 J Z ART FEATURE,TVP. II , . ■ BENCHES,FLAGPOLES,LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS,AND LIGHT AND POLES.THE v O J Z i , m ;, 1 , '' OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY I , APPROVED. Q• DECORATIVE CONC.PVMT. A QcoW8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING 2 WAREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA.REQUIREMENTS-S'EE DETAIL � __ t20'CANNON STONE1044.7' M� ( , 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24'WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE,SPACED 48'ON CENTER >- Wi,' ICONC.PNMT.PER W1 ; III PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC.WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE S WIDE. L,SEDETAILG " __ ICITY ST�RD,TYP.IWALL„SEE DETAILS,11 117 ' ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDJQ NP. IIIII T I- ��y■ OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. Z ; 0 o r_� ■■ II 1__, Q Ile -I: `\ ' //, - 10. CURB AND GUTTER TYPE SHALL BE 8612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE O g°p, ' V Ii DRAWINGS-TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL U ` �' I 8.0'- Z I I1. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 0 V = ii U lko ;x t I 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES,NUMBERS,AREAS 1- O \ /� //�/ y AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. \'''"� \ q// // �* I I 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS,DIMENSIONS. r \ may\ i // ■ COI I 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS w .` // LONG WMT M TYP IW iNOTED OTHERWISE. DETAIL Er 2HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 4'A ��.,� I ■ 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE,4'W IDE TYP.1\\ `-, \ ART FEATURE,TYP. 1 IA. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE 11GHT DUTY'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.SEE SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT VYAS ACCESSIBLE PFD. `\` �" St SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. �\ \ 'Pj8 PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MV DIRECT ' RAM04P,TYP. �` / .) ■ SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITIIA LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER .'i ■ CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE.SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. UNDER THE LAWS SOFO THE STATE OF ��„ 4/1/ ' ,IP- , r MI ESOTA. • 10H EXIST. m ` I M ew R.Pevek t CONC.WMT.PER �a*** ''oma 1 .----- DATE 7/15/16 LICENSE No.44263 CITY STANDARD,TYP. \ , -- CITY OF EDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: ' 20'LAN10N STONE s , 1. RESERVED FOR CIN SPECIFIC NOTES. ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY -- SEATWALL„SEE DET DATE DESCRIPTION ,-...,_** ,. • 1YP. 7/15116 CATV SUBMITTAL , �� �� I I SITE AREA TABLE: `,® ® DEcoRAnvEPVMT. / - *ill I I I LRAMP,i ACCESSIBLE WALK RAIV1 EXIST.REFURBISHED SIGN >,-l',.. REVISION SUMMARY ' \ ------- -”- DATE DESCRIPTION \ I \ \ i 1I / \ I \ SITE PLAN \ �/1. '\._,'-°' \ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL ,t \ \ II KNWGOPHERSTATEONECALL ORG (800)252-11E8 TOLL FREE MiNo� I (fit)454-0002 LOCAL \ s C2 .0 s / / ul //7 / v / /, cb , / l l l 0X/// // --- / / / / / / c-§6 / /I / bilis\ / X / �---,______,_ / 40, co /I / , � 3 3 // / / / % �� V co /11 X a ' •,4'1 / i d r-- � $ 14; X / Pi ,,,ift_ o, ,o) „...,_ ii ,„_____ Cb I / ><` tfl oo ----,4 i,, . A ..t.mommonAtio* / ____,_ � i ! / /t;7 ft; ll 1 �: �/ 881■■.� *II1_g_ 9 / .22.'112112-:1- I • `) // o . imi a / /11 / ,40.',.1.V..1-,' co h i :':' A Y' l i co 1 "'i./ All (1:12!1'11'2.'12'A'21 f \,/',,,,, , �� Do/ / / 1 rAQAs''Ay_,4 arA_r=f..i,+ll O \\ CO Xl� S ` 11�, r , 'a1 �� ,0 y� �. ° A //�� QY Iti / cb N /�q gg ra / 7 / T6 '>pV, d' g 4 ' mg O /L� 6 X "sem vs, oa Co' d ,,,,' / ., ° �8 i- -„, [T, -ri ZI g I X F- -El pimouramv- Cij �� � ..4 a ��Cbg) i,./ / irk � X timi ' X � ,X e '22,......2 ___, i q:, _ �� N 0 A cb ASI 7 ao,o , ilin f -- • 0 0. i'"/1411111 - -- - -- P a/ 1 S- 4) _, ---R-0 Ad. .: *IOW-• rip,Ifr __. _____ 16.1 - b'8WOr "�' 11117 4-,.,\‘\- 44,:,44.._, , , ___ _ tee- - ��, 1 N 4 5P , \me ig -20 mp /64 0 p r) /1,,0 / g /' 0 BITUMINOUS , A.,N Xii \ X \ _ _ /� — -z�_—___awe_—= .C�. / ,..___- _ -__\T.,--,-___-_-_\-_—>�— >� —>�— �\ ,.,--->»—h6YJ ,\ .\c3 \\ \\ co N • �'9 0�� (PUB1 RI�fX / , , . N _ _ oo , ul X , c) X i X f o / o 0 0 0 2 IG/ D g � z 'o C) /I P G) I m Z 1 $ / R7 873' ,, c1 8 N a m � v $= z m P Som p Taernm 5 D' Fr 0 gno 0 2p z z z z z d Pm� o S 9 a z c soA o a1 9 p f r D D T m p D ! Z U Q m y b N v PROJECT �'' N ...A_ TOWN HALL STATION m ,- A ? Nr' m. a m ill ,, Tirql 11o y 9gFz‹ p 12 1 H v o-,°,6p> 4500 VALLEY VIEW ROAD.EDINA,MN 113 I- _ ��", Z Co € x 'm�"ao i 3m�� CO TOWN HALL TAP mg Z 4810 CHICAGO AVENUE S,MINNEAPOLIS.MN 55417 1^ o, �. 14,2 f!a -> �� NA6T 9 �cx CivilSite / ,.....---2.'"----,--:._- /,_ ��, • 1 � �� IC SITE PLAN LEGEND: �/ . / c5),9 llt �e91.a ti R O U P \\ > M�CCCE�SIBLE WALK RAMP I f CONCRETE PAVEMEM'AS SPECIFIED PAD OR WALK) d931 OU SP RK,M olmE 2110 _� ' \ / ___- PROPERTY LINE ( ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 .9 = \ \/ n 763(,33944 952.253.2003 esia /\ Y Matt Pevek Pa Sarver �0 ��9 a _ �Q -try- CUR TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLAN �\ e----7-�. 1 MATCH I �6 I I ..� • T '=> TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROWS shea X�9 I MATCH MST. I p / /I ,� 9J0 tret ; ••I \ \ u.N 11 II SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY.SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. \ 9 I a CONC.PVML PER j HC=ACCESSIBLE SIGN / `T/0)i -\\\6,K........._ I CRY STANDARD,TYP. ',J NP=NO PARKING FIRE LANE - 90.9 / N' it ST=STOP msame.a.e. \ I 87 TU AA � i 1 CP=COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY e,iaw ` \ / I "7 V T SITE LAYOUT NOTES: PVMT.MARKINGS,X•WALK TYP. I / Ln \ I I/ (99 / V 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO '----Z-9:1-.-1- \ BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,LOCATIONS OF EXISTING \ �r\5 51 .6 �' •-� \ AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES EASEMENTS,SETBACKS,URLRIES,BUILDINGS AND \ PAVEMENTS.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL.LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS / \ - �\ .� //• �' FOR TIE SITE.ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, Y THE F F _ \ I • DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO LJ \ 1_/ ENGIN ER/LANDSCAPE ARCER.ADJUSTMENTS TO TIE ECT PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OLAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED F MATERIALS.STAKE 'll �,6 \ \ 6 9\ LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 1 .10 KATEXIST. 9\ 2 THECONTRACTOR SHALL GRT#-WABTAI ALL ETESSSA YNaPERMS PRI TOCONSTRUCTION, F CURB TAPER \ ', i I I F co C_ - -�� �C, 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL TCN I IN 1 . \` .` REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 891 .01 4 , 7 Q I 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE • Bry I i ^ BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE 3 `\ PRIOR TO INSTILLLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. • • • � 1 / _ ! 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES,ROADWAY PAVEMENTS,CURBS AND GUTTERS,BOLLARDS, V \/ I ,r 9 - /// AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD,PRIOR TO /� O I % .0 9 /\� I N �k� `_C �� 1 `.7 ^ t1 INSTALLATION,FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEERAANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. Z Z 390. • 97 �` I �C - 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB.BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE / \ OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION.LOCATION OF BUILDNG IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND O 2 CO-' •.O I 18.r. ATCH 1�� --moi' 5 979 SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. Z a vj �` • J / 9 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR Q Q Q O CO" / ' D 61 REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEERAANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO - I FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS,BUT W ~ W /II! 1,0' I NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING,FURNISHINGS,PAVEMENTS,WALLS,RAILINGS, �/� ❑ BENCHES,FLAGPOLES,LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS,AND LIGHT AND POLES.THE C I m OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY 0 J • CONI. APPROVED. J K Q j CINSTAN 8. PEDESTRIAN CURBRAMPSSHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDINGW y W AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ADA.REOUIREMEMSSEE DETAIL. Q ❑ o /4/1 / B. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24'WIDE WHITE PAINTED UNE,SPACED45 ON CENTERT >- Z Z 9 0.6 I I PERPENDICULAR TOTHE FLOW OF TRAFFIC.WIDTHOF CROSSWALK SHALL BESWIDE. i• J jiiiii..._/: 1 I ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED L Q I I I I CP9OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. Z j 0 O SCJ §I 15. CURBANDGUTTERTYPESHALLBEB612UNLESSOTHERWISENOTEDONTHE o I Q(� I / 77 DRAWINGS-TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPESSEE DETAIL. p U 27 0 r o.3I / \ I I I 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I r 6 \ / '� \ I z I ip, CONC.PVMT'812. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES.NUMBERS,AREAS p / __ -- ,\ tW W �BTMECH AREA BY AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. X \ , WDC 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS,DIMENSIONS. 9O�// \ \ ,11*4111 , 77 CS9 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO IXISTING BUILDING UNLESS w _,/ .lSl. • \ \ �� \\ C /-� /� NOTED OTHERWISE p _ I / 9 \ • 1 •o'xi / 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE,4'W IDE TYP. \--v Q \ �. I / HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, DI/ ` US 90.64 \ 1 18. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE LIGHT DUTY'UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.SEE DETAIL Oj fi � SHEETSFORPAVEMENTSECTIONS. SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS 0) •// �\/t PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MV DIRECT Cb %/ �3. \ \ 1 /I I / �� LICENSED(PROFESSIONAL ON AND THAT I ENGINEER 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A 90.'�� . \ \ „ CITY S ANDA PER 1/, CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE.SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF • \` \ MATCX VI L. � 90.61 '� \\1 1 Al \CITY STANDARD,TYP. H 0 I /O MI ESOTA. C5 7 \\ ,� . ; \ \ \ lY� / / DATE 7/15/6 6LCENSE NO.44263 �) .Pavek cbc . V� MATCH `-,� \F/' I \\ 1\ / / ' CITY OF EDINA SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: l' O N -\ \ //,„,..=i ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY \ ,o' ■ I I \ \ i- 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. • ' \ P` -.� ■� DATE DESCRIPTION r MATCHEXIST. \\ Ti 6 c n SUBMITTAL e/r ►LSA a� 0O -►- '."w�IP111101� X97 c V ,\ 9 •6 Tc:< �b SITE AREA TABLE: Mi per, PVMT.MARK( ',X WALK T1P. 91'14I _ 91.84 m Se 9 .. MA \ \ LOCKABLE DOORS TO MATCH FENCE, ' / I • C. I \ 89 TRANSITION TO 8612C&G \ _ / �i 891.2 _ a 0) RIBBON CURB,TYP. \\111111k1;)\ \\ Nl'CANNON STONE I I `:=4 \ ' CANC.PVMf.TYP y��i SEATW• „SEE DETALS,TYP \ 6' CK REINF.CONC. AD' \ I I REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 6A #‘'..-ilfili � V "31 6'DECO'' I I M TCH + 9 11.1 68.69 • � , 4 i,AY.,•AQUE ; • 91.62. MAT I 7, . . ! ��, ��Ifilk r I SITE&GRADING `•� v�i� �•89.92 � ii a •0• �, '��1� 91 I" b GOPHER STATE ONE CALL PLAN(NORTH) .tr 69.60 .9 /ggo� .w IMI 1. .,-=3i'��/� .- .,'S. 4 •SNA• S / z n_`',,.. _ in 9_ I Cry, YWJ✓J GOP(BW)252-E 68 TOLLL REE 1E50 454-0002 LCCAL _'WV C4.0 S-0. * -. CivilSite •sus: ' ` - T. � pESIGN 86(8 •-Vr �i 3R OUP P [AM msO NI..IT.o MEM T 4:. :.,v , _ p,]a_ --r--� 49.LW35TH TH ST.SUI E 200 Ptiatts • y: © 0 Matt Pavek Pat Sarver DOMMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY p,Ac A.Aa u EE.> J GvilSileGroup wm 'BATH BOULEVARD SIDFWALK e•cuss s•12 - .df l• • •''•-\" •�;'®lP��' 0 3/C 761203-3944 952-250-2003 RUSSIA.OAS RW!A,• aN Cao A".,FA..R S-E.uEta / + \ ♦ R.1/2- R-]• - e' cement O MGM(M) -(M ST. CVMaPI ART \ / o Q� CdRI,ACI.a ANa m1 RIP Bli.MAT Cd ii S M. r 14,0( / (MJ `�o- ] 1 CEYK �fl_ SUDPE]4 PER FT. ONO - I O,YO c9 is !+} DwATE CONCRETE WALK LAYOUT '— tel . ._c EJI=� MM�� �� a IDN 1p•W2.SROP[ r WITH BOULEVARD. III EASE T I� aliPER6OM NAV „r E aDR PPaD�EDaR T,; Shea (M.) I - MANT aL.RL)ala - -•-O'er0111/ L A_ -1FARM PM ND M.,s tM6.WE- Ar an.xr roDro;TM n. ATEN AT GM SECTIO/THRU wALK ~_ 1B• e•^-I .*,c .,„. .,ErNmANCE sm a®®iR®� a®sk't•>� e -71k�sfYa dp,dIN A r ra,l Ell DESIGN B61�M '`r�_. PIER To 0Tua:R:10 e1 as :pros sa....n — WARW.n STQIF. R-3.• I_ TE Woo N um=1»IE (IIrD Wyl) tw •'. {fA�£1. ]— • •• t a ° lr --►II—LLL/1/�/rrr --..ILL SI Dal[w6- -RAI/2” R.]' o .' • • O Y mo®AN Eu. —TOP MT"!I .• -- --_- EMAN•M i* 14 A COMET YW. ( $LOPE]! PER FT • A1NT M. = • e ! • NCI= Vx' Mlx Y—e cOMMMERCI AL DRIVEWAY FORMAcwR TONT As A_i�\s�' NOTES eASE 7' WITH SIDFWALK TO (EG APPRAX .DL ora 5E.l ARE 0 ram �� r aTARIDm ERP SEE P221151 R PLAmo„T6 SG ARO Iy PMEGOK FOR CORSI.ION a A L_, J CLAM s BASE CURB RETURN,HALF PLAN PERSPECTIVE DRIVEWAYS. ,. _ a m.uD0•n'EMA0021 ARr In'PRPunwu Aawr f (ER w�) A•MT PAYER.IN 2-T 1001* (2'EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE vu MA,PER SAsn,o u xl.,(SEawm 4 -j _._..•w- �� • BOWL WITH 5'wALx.) 2 canwLrz AREAS ARE Pw',.o SEPARATELY). -. ___I a NE • ® 'o' EMANsaR JOT.A,Ib E,M(APPaD.] ---- to ------ - - tr ---- OMMY PAw1ENr 2 . r TAwA 1 SLOPE NAP1MUN N,ERvus 16 we.W. 11 I.ROOMED u NEL MAX L OO�."•,101,,,.'a'"e`r,T.tlbaa,k"wwniE DESIGN MOUNTAflI F R-,r E 1/r • rExs,wNl aro MP AT T I 9 FAouro wiollAr as FL/Fr.awi 1 /' ":.m smFOR A. .canaEn mLwxIDIRECTOR O'ENNIO MP/ ` PAro Fw As a'ccncaEE DmN:wAY a apExr. R-er 1J OPO66 I FylxyM yyIllik EDWI TI i� HTE Tws Ew P[D AARP uTAns I ]� I^ r1/2"COI RE.1GER BLro / 6 CMGPMN.r 3 D •'Wll.PWT O s 400 PAR IDik TOP BIT.MAT R.1/B( 1 - _.1, • E ` .'.S SECTION A-A O ci.S mr EilEs INAx.O. I I 1+ • • 77 e n lIN`i�"T' OSEeaSTA PLATE•00 FOR• aem APROII AewKEROu ERIaL wm LT MI-a T,oa ••la a ,. •APRON CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE 1NOWELED O PyORP Y f� Rlm117Euiii !!1lFamwi'vEl Willie\ AND MATCH EXISTING DRIVEWAY PATTERN. OTHER ' a q J UT CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL MATCH THE MIXE0 a 13 SEE n AST DREWAr - --- EXISTING DRIVEWAY JOINT PATTERN AND STYLE. OP nI w.w,aN EACH UNCUT WE '�a.CCRC _ I'ROAM LIP 2A.._ CONCRETE SNN a[e'cFnvxFre PAvfMEni' fI -10.5' 1T.3 - Z (M AE90 MAW O.Rl - CCNOE.aro. PLACFO MT OwATp Y 161411 D a c,A55 5 SASE AMO ff F� _-_ 2B-. O c c EMA rnI)EMIT G G� CITY OF EDINA REMSED: CITY OF EDINA CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON REVISED: _CITY OFEDINA CONCRETE CURB & REMSED: r < d CO <-'''" ENGINEERING COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES 2-12 "" °N ENGINEERING 04-09 ENGINEERING 01-13 CC Z Q O p§'(ze'^ &PUBUc ,f--- - STANDARD fy(- w.) &PUBLIC AND CONCRET WALK STANDARD ,/E13 3PUBLICINEERI GU TAT/ycR STANDARD O O_ . " WORKS _GL_A ubLwG PLATE WORKS � •tt' PLATE F J� WORKS �(%ryN00P A03 w�C. PLATE CO Q W "•a•" DEPTS. .1a1wa 400 \'"F... DEPTS. -. u o 410 '`a.� DEPTS. AMC,. cm PIONEER 500 O J 2'WEAR COURSE(MNDOT 2360-SPWEA34OB) J D' Q 2 THIS OCCURS ONLY WHETSTOOLEDCONTROLJ IIT //////EGOINIZEM TACK COAT(MNDOT 2357) MULCH MEETSEWE OF WALK SEE DETNL(TYP.) W LU IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 2BINDER COURSE(MNDOT 2360-SPNWB330B) LEAVE TOP OF Q } Z Z MULCH DOWN 1' MINT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO �'I.����e� 8'CLASS 5 AGGREGATE FROLI MULCH DOWN WAIT( TRAFFIC WITH 3.WOE SMOOTH W j a..41Pkesa4Plea.'terP SUBBASE(MNDOT 3136) M TROWELLED EDGE J < FINISHED!-••E 4CONCRETEAS SPECIFIED Z j 0 O II-I�.�=. �.A COMPA D SUBGRADE(100%OF STANDARD � i Ur 11:-.1E-11.711.-J111- u �%% PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSRY) 1.8 X W1.8 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS AS 0 Q R� SPECIFIED LO 0 HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT o�%�� � ! 6CLASSSAGGREGATEBASE 0 v 1 1=n=u=n-a-u-u= O NTS 11=11=1111=111f=!!. COMPACTEDSUBGRADE a NOTES: co 3'RADIUS CORNERS ,INSTALLATION AFD REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN •41- r B' 17I. 1:3 BATTER SLOPE GUTTER ACCORDANCE MAN ON-SITE A.C.I.TECHNICIAN AS SPECII ED. F- 2 SEE GED-TECNBNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHT W 1122'RADIUS r / 314'11' REQUIREMENTS. 0.5%SLOPE-CONSTRUCT WITH REVERSE SLOPE 3.SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. a GUTTER .0.GUTTER WHERE THE PAVEMENT SLOPES 4.SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS. EL FINISHED GRADE (T ) 3.NTMOE EXPANSON JOINT AND SEAANTATALL CURBS. _ AWAY FROM CURB.SEE PLAN B.WIRE MESH AND CHARRS REQUIRED FORAMRACISMIN LOCATIONS FOR Y CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, b I_I I E• 1 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. I HEREBY SPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS FINISHED GRADE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT 1.INST O1 LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE WALK/PAD .;. •<E„ R. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 4 NTS UNDERVTHE LAWS OF THE STA STATE 10'-0'O.C.H- LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ..O. ••_A G.a . 2.BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON .i•� �- SOIL CONDITIONS MI EsoTA. �•,.%' .�.i CLASS V AGGREGATE SUBBASE-SEE 4, P / BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DETAIL(6'MIN.) M eW R.Pavek O B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DATE6/22/15 LICENSE NO.44263 2 N T S ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 7/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL LOPE GUTTER 314'11' 2M ONTINUOUS SLOPE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER •AVEMENT MATERIALS FINISHED GRADE SEE DETAIL . NE=il I NI 1 1' REVISION SUMMARY ..0- I t.:ra.;:�/.0- 15, DATE DESCRIPTION r [— NOTES: • 1.INSTALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AT 15-0'O.C.3/- 2.BASE DEPTH DEPENDANT UPON SOL CONDITIONS • ORIBBON CURB CIVIL DETAILS 3 NTS C5.0 çiyijsite u P 4931 W.35TH ST.SUITE 200 ST.LOUIS PARK,MN 55416 CIVISileGrOUP.corn 5 g WET A Matt Pavek2l0a03 g i! 78}2133944 952-250-2003 mm DIM A hilk ® .4 TIALTI U O MITT®O ® Op f Ga�Irt nem®® ® ei;Cr 131 FR.Or r1 n - n f ► PPan.A ► �.�., shea 7. PERPENDICULAR ' O kJ Sp MOW 0 MAME NM:®' I xr I ®•I I or I 'I r I .I DIAGONAL® , „, ,_ 10 _,D . , 1 ION PIFRORIAAN O w.om..a® -- " ® �Iu1 ..'..!,,:H, r ROTES. L.DIMS SMALL•LOU10 ANTRIM IP PEDESTRIAN ACCESS APTE pAIANS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE T A IDsaam O - O O SLOPES avrTw TPA noa, CURB&GUTTER DETAIL ....vae Aa ware AM.� ::. ' wALp4 PUKE 44I� ... , eta.SU DPP .1•••assipmcorn o E' o 0 n PP OF. RISE TIERED PERPENDICULAR FAN P01.1310.1roro•u m• a IN O .. .TRACTION 401.5 Val BE COMM.Al.. m Or TRAM. Mm G� TO DEM HAM me L..Ala wp•wCT weamomm.r Krws TM 0.0 Mor ;/.. ,r10, .r®. P.war'c•L L•P yr a,TEM DM.In. MOM MT wmru i:' "' SEDALDRIWa a awe .. ®a® TOP Or CM MEAL.113.1 PROM.MM...SRAM 4 AT OA.0 �'a'mrs PM. aSoalr ® ®--- ---® ® AM 0111.1 A_ .eOr TM AT TIE TIE 01.• OF / �� v';:, '!;:.'..4T.;:.:'.: / ` '�'!aSQ� •.: >,,. r Mk :tk.:o;,.•,.;: - p ESL 0—"0. -f®• m caopcr I TOM.M.USE PATTO SMALL ME Via[aTsbslo PLATER.MTH Of PAD.OM DE rao II¢r 1 r e TOR rcetmxu onsas OM xrtttMlt A.M. j% .:.v}••.Y>�,.1.....:,,,,, ••,i t Y;....-�1� j\�YL:::'...::' x_.:.Y ..L...:�•.-.ti MGR I o O}n M' •" CURB AND GUTTER PARALLEL DJ ` ° ® REINFORCEMENT KM MEALY.onor ! .!.. D t7 .='I. ®B�f MOO LOOM EMI YAFaMM1 SIOR p ALL OvacirOaS No rami TH. 18 USE ql CW RIIP RETROfITs © % moNSTMOI amt.a SMATO S MU..TO T mom Prem M▪ wNM • - e,. ®NEea Spi DE loot or cm. ROTES MN.gip:WptavF➢iMYLI,IE PIMP* 1/T E. .. .. areof ow I n amort O.M ePUnuig artT No.3 o•knon LF POSITIVE NI`lE INFO M A TB p M 4L - — .re:Marna.. o o LOCITI °EOTEOlimm s .A A w La.w ant am MCPETE PPM. Mr Ln THAT M..T DOOM ME aMLr Am a wrtA,ma COMM o Y-Lwsr 0 01 Hr Srr=DE SDEL4 Lean OM RIM a �` mese., MSC rot Do L O PREMED~ GA V!e O QOM AGea TO DE co`�"OaR 11.010 L.A S TOTMO eaCr�1.F..0`OISS15 ;, RSA DEPRESSED CORNER ®mo•�+�MELe s mem sax TEEM.anasraa Mal ON FLA. ®•O ��TT mm J ® w"SLD`:.'cOp xE TriO.wo"E0LST 10'`"we WM Or Fae"er"L.rIS uwm—c— SECTION A-A ®ESO RM. .9 PM ALL 01.Mur Tan ow aux / : r PITA VOWRMATEREW AGENAL ,m Alo on.1111.1.- �`rrY . ' °a i.'Vp Ortru M 1!MT. I V ..16/611411_I j gir . a`!, , .. - ®�M.TM NO P.M com o To us MATERTED AT ToT CD.VT. m • iiSi /� CORER.W� O . +... __ LFOEIDi �i ®� +L Dm AT rows. Z Ln Me A.�E�n�',p ..n .. . Ilea '• Tarn ono TO u LO • • S ��'^^ 11 n.vn.Yer.a -• t OM FIV T."•. art. ralae a r,ODD I.m s EMS. me nis cuss sup Si.NOT mom Los PAVEMENT TREATMENT OPTIONS arO oe TAIENT Vtfilfy a u 0 Axart a ro.e c v ass Pee, prn OZ Z O s m rRJwaO SECTION CL ® +p = IN FRONT OF CURB&GUTTER O 2 muSECTION B-B n PaS52DA/ovlQsm CeRO- Ma Dmf MK▪SH▪ALL MOT Dam am POR l00 Irl Sc-RLQ eeTaOFITs Q ^ U) Fr ENS A• am em Li J �L rn ,, PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS `vWv4! PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS Q Q AQ oa w C✓ 8-6-2014 STANDARD PLAN 5 297.2501 1 OF 5 M� CUA— ��:! n��l 8 6 2014 STANDARD PLAN 5 297.250 3 OF 5 �` w ~ w a� (/) o J z J ° J 2 J Q In Q W = LL, Z Z I > w w T J a Z < 0 o lY La rCTEB IA,'�1.i'iF:c ; S RO. MODS .rrm® ® alwa p a FLpa aer,e Tx.•..o<. o 0 (7), I ertaML. I a•,m. 4eniEIA«Tr• pr• y TIaF a•aF.uT.,L Ie •. • m."rS^ar?e a .r03 s Ar 91,f4O ® -'--�) r eE ® a ____ MN TIE O MODIAL a13 11Kamm Fa DART.1101 DM SOL ADAM.P�O IATIM LNrACE tt T W� O O avow M� 8 ' O.Renm W PREFERRED mi a[ K. ----� ®ec*:$ � TO Moe RA.ma.00.03 ARE PROMLY mom.TA as a"e Lm eRAMAL Er4, cs�T°ra"L RAWL Ors AILSIMAM Mon comPLELELY ... ;yll�•I r° i�wr"6^�O O. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, a•\.OO`O'nOV,�� E FL.er w+m+ �h'4�OD`O[OB'IIjj1 m�LnT001 m.PLATE nTvoE s,r RM1.11 imo Avon T arta[rE wppa �B�� � i�a�'x�''uwEr�r Lm SPECID DI MEN,OR REPORT WAS 7 a stem O Mo MET.Or S Mg AD..OETAny OT onE 0 �-I�Tr®.I DETECTABLE EDGE WITHOUT CURB AND GUTTER PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT T DETECTABLE EDGE WITH SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY AWACve TO MNFIAIAAIE YEAR AoaaCO6 r0 WALKABLE SMACE AE�y�Ly�� CURB AND GUTTER® LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AOaaflMf TS IOFE4AAlIL swACE UNDER THE 1/7 Mom.mum FILLER anom no.id...ICOM Flia E.lc ma. M WS OFOTHE E STATE OF COMBINED DIRECTIONAL® �n191 OTT TTE BACK OF CUTTO.3.ACOTT SM..Aar HALL ISE TM Cf BEMS nrelmeit.Kum.moms slooT.AT SETT.7 FROM TIE mat or me. . 1 .41.DETECT/aLr 11.111102 San rE NTT.p WA TO rani.THE Ms CI I.Of CM. ,WOW: ot OMR.e00.0 OAm 07 Lonanum•5LoPT Is m.Txm�•E•MLL2▪.0B Oar Ill ALL .lorto aRA a..asxY Di rw MDP Ma ew R.Pavek MAL eecoa a MIAs 0 wax 0 ML olEnmla en p LLL Vaar:nae ®� a e s WAT ALLOWS' len �© O aavc E GATE 6/22/15 LICENSE NO.44263 •111 t KO Di SCE TREAT..0....F014 EVA.a FLARES ate E /fiI MIL lu. atac4ETame c,"s°ek0.�MED,la mnua Imre P.Rear a ` ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY n ® «awaA.e n aueAa ®®LMi.,a p�i`aaipm`arzaAi'm�E`x Dam,w aam0'a'EA.AES OR.TO PLO. n ;447z74,-- iiyyk. Wa ® _ `e Am O`�5.;'. I. ®r�cr =MD Of MM. r4., HOTEL DATE DESCRIPTION _ iSI O rtE.IS EUEpnS. AwTwa muss ON oroconc Www. -7/15/16'CITY SUBMITTAL TITETTER A Mr.IS 11.J.OR VDT NALL BE TIC MOM ® o ® - 0 ® W.a o.a R..TME,a a.®DU RAOUL 1 UNRO CUM CM cocoa ALm as RAra6 TM,r Me. .MOW. iso.5 Pm rum . TE.TATATE m.o. m,mvOf Oa a xaYamaaTE L ®MR TO COPORETE ar a FLU. .Aaii ATO MMTE waol ILL IE F ms[a A Oaoert rua Looms Auumr TO A mrt� a aw. M.TM DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT WHEN ®FE WV un r `p a'1 • ESQ ONE-WAY DIRECTIONAL rnAOc SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED a arae.ac—re s:a 00605 Am'� Wp 10 Tmr r E'•P{.-Kamm ......... Or SI m GI 10,01l2 ESR pE e cram ®,tl AS ATEDM aeLm 0.WATETam.of 80 spRos.wrT E"' Ticeidons NE To Ato smut,TE MOWN DE R.Di co.ar. ""1O°p i R apex LEWDQ ARE. //©Sii frAe "i}:::"n �O e memenmA AIM nTTICAATINDD caans ctlow aFic?.v w� Aor.mLaAu NM aa..L.rE :. ___ I r ®I ® a'�sL,E LRImrIMrla M.v ET.. Fun ;(jmpupsi A LETTOO no110 nforT`mEEOAA 10 DC" °m°9cE'OF Marro.IT Aw`AT.s-it FOR.c.EDGE a H 1-4-.1N71-0-.1 mj!!!!!!!!!IIIIIIIIIIII 4 o4 Om CAMEO APPROACH NOSE DETAIL ® COISTRICTED 0.5 MST NUE 1 CONTALAIT DEDETABLE EDP PP T. smwL REVISION SUMMARY --rryyy- < p O•R'T[We1• .446. OR BORRsr.31 SIDE a TRAFFIC Man :1:f aaaaee mEAa ring no::SLOPE a«LL IM+Errsm xMx F AM .Tan TO ADPCH PP`3 Rrt°rer+m D.Cs. T..FOiww o``.a WARNINGS 0 ® ,, _ _ mne naa SECTION D-D TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS® rmle AA TOW i[ms 00 LESS TT.3 DP.Ir 18565rteA'0 APr mo�iinr S.M. DATE DESCRIPTION B ® RA1 V°a_ Via+ Aron. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS 05.5% me ® PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS • Z M'"� MOO OF CURB FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS ® � �' �✓" 8-6-2014 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 2 OF 5 2�-- (©�rQ,-m} ;;/ �T 8 4 2014 STANDARD PLAN 5297.250' 4 OF 5 CIVIL DETAILS C5. 1 / / / v / 0 / ' / /,// 7\ 1_, 7_48 ' / i X / � �.� ._,�..��. ,,„ / / r - op lirli1. / / I' i 1114: 44/11. / / ' re 0 i - _ ., , __ N OP rid N ;;' Ill\��r,� // / 7 -' IiV ■■■� i' 1 N A �� ,��i0. r �fi-aa nra° /0�� ♦ i a9rC x x_ � 711 i '- f 1 � Sae'e ix:'1' �' r,i /' 4I !'PJ1J �ii ',.�/ ■'+ ': ill■ ...sr' , `� loin• ��; y m O U C' ,73/ •" ��'�� L4Y %IjU$• J pp�.� • -, m ; �'m� m 5Al o oe el ; 1111 , it %4Iiimm:aii1.4tillimAlirtillti 1 4 i 14 ... ii Likeit .1.4 , sill .dallikiillitil):3,.\,\, • C'' ° A ,,,• NENEmew 11Milk Ay 1 afkoppAo4,) ii ....-zameiza..; „, 1 . ' 1/4 Ilr, . t . , / '°� , \ JP.WeeN.... +';.; /} ��11191111 4Va' p jam' f /- 0,1111 F i. 4th 11111 -----,,_ a .,, / i \\ ;\\ I /. orb' `' 0 0' `'....‘ 'd ,A44illt116. ";3* '- r a auvawravavRrwav� w,,,..... � � n a 'witii� �' ' 1 ,,,, \ –1 ..114-ii.ni1P., i% ,i'l L Ao. AL.fires,;:trwAinskriintr_.,,,, __„„,..2,61,4wer., , ____ *) \ ‘ 'Alt.t.,-ituf imm,...staissFrislowegreeekramiraiswp_Apito . �,,. 4 iiirvipagginurigismiNallird a 11111 7,4- . Alf Mr III1PIIIIF \-- illipik.7. 10 k\ ,_ _. _ _ , 911011PIP/ _ 8 2 G _. 0 i P / O 0 LD D A1 C , —w—� –_� cn A o L m �+ N O C L S D S #3P gll 111„1 v "�' pg c oN £� m = £ "y y m� c"Sczi z T ril Ag '-'D y0 o 2 `Al igm tE Zig= . 2g oi§ m 6 g !4!. m n9. fib' a gm m o g10&'<g - w, mem -'g� �DD'Il Z § r0 m o z y� y 2 02'a g o z6 Em' i)§, § .Zl Yin s mg 0 F E`X yl -1 P g N co P ' ig ~ fn C o N ,go Z< El O r �ri N (C� p m T04 , r .g8_, yC5 P o yyy •N g E.Z. ; T im O• r TDx ? m gD T A E m z g M LI 64 E'.' g 3cmo A2mN' z 'qx Si O S a o o'A11 Rp° s N TPrO y f[� y �J� R _ _ S' Nm ' Ea39 pS6giiIu t-3l ss tE n, Q ` z o §2 �, § mp_ pc ; 11;�¢ 1 8l al Ota N 2 i mYo' oN 5 s"s. 4. o 2 i ,' $g r2 F y $ 2g, z ri'' i 5 g,V I I a 0 mg t " Y 1 fitP, p . p 1 O 534 3 to E l i 2 i dS 3co $ '' s .P �9' § it h i 3 � I d I s Yz ° 2 2 A O E 31 x 0 4% r 00 is 1 •.. S' PM g moo r712 D; m ,-,-,,, [1:Uj `3"1 E C15 i g.. 2 Emc 2"'2-- O {(/1 O 1 mi cc x 1 22r1 2 T A <A NA j N Z w % N y= 1, i A 1 $ 9§ -8$ yo ,,o o y T _ o co Fn' §m 1 c FOO' N Qo o ,38 o R Ao0 6 ;1 l€N M _ $H, 1 "1 A m �m iS' o 9 '§' E N g QQo z �z m �F a u a>a x» m 1J N N " ;'7 Z'�Z. cA vNy o �Z io A mf i�5 y mT s �j m g 7 PP PPP 'N" „,os; m m zP mo y. n' oz �$ m mg p in,pp� ti O A Q�"b D '. y r A i. N d o D n N c i 0 r go G s A`$z W m c1gRgc•,pp t,0 0 c' mm mm mmm YY A ri z DNm -0' NZ OO ' g ,g q,gp pm go, O r g €N m S; ` ys,0 g T DN N . g ymp $'$' $X X X S mC .E' �' i PF FP F PS m i 22 2 i 11 y_ PROJECT "i F. N U ym - TOWN HALL STATION NS D m _ C f A Z a E p m rn v Too< 1 zg O zIII 1 ea ~ ` 11' main° C/) z c 7= y A` X31 Fig� > D 3n?Lfa> 4500 VALLEY VIEW ROAD,EDINA,MN ICO 5� M A F. N fl PJ TOWN HALL TAP Q m �• O z S om-`y ? z 4810 CHICAGO AVENUE S,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55417 9/A sommumek IRRIGATION NOTES: CiVilSite _ / ii PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE 1. ENTIRE SITE SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT IRRIGATION SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW / ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE(RETAIN G R O U P _ / Pr AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. \//�_ , I14'r A- _�!a • ir���47% NORMAL TREE SHAPE) ST LOUIS STA ST.SUITE 200 /I / -/,/// THREE rxa-rzS WOODEN STAKES,STAINED BROWN 2. SEE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IRRIGATION WATER,METER,AND POWER / \ --19,<,?. /_7/_,\ ���e \ . II .2..-v- --- . VMSWIlli TWOS BE NDS THREADED TT WASTEROUGH BLACK RUBBERST.LWIS PARK.MN 55416 / ` _/// CONNECTIONS CIVIISBeGrvup.com .. lir STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120'70 ONE ANOTHER Man PaveM Pat Server --- WIRE SHALL BE THREAOm TMRWOH BLACK RUBB ]63-213-3944 952-250.2003 HOSE COLLARS.ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODS 3. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES PRIOR TO ANY MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR EXCAVATIONANSTALLATION.ANY DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND/ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES SHALL BE THE `` �\ ' \ \ • II / 0.11"'.'"I' TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION PLANT TREE r-2°ABOVE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH CORRECTING DAMAGES SHALL BE BORNE X\ yam / ��� COMPACT GRADE ENTIRELY BY THE CONTRACTOR \ a Y \ I �,-� COMPACT BOT'OM OF PR TVP. • CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT 4. SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE PER LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY STANDARDS ARO SHALL BE PER \ ,, I �� BALL IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE,REMOVE COMPLETELY NATIONAL AND LOCAL CODES.EXACT LOCATION OF SERVICE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE she a \ —I BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUIVALENT AT THE JOB SDE. \\ 1 II =' MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TOEDGE OF 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY FOR THE PROPOSED ELECTRICAL SERVICE AND CP 0 l&1 PLANTING BED,IF AFPUCABLE.ROCK CR ORGANIC �\' I� �� MULCH,SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES PLAN METERING FACILITIES I I �/ NOTES FORROA MULCH TYPE.KEEP MULCH MIN.?FROM /1 I U r wik�` III PLA7iTTRuwc 8. IRRIGATION WATER LINE CONNECTION SIZE IS 14i'AT BOLDING-VERIFY WITH MECHANICAL PLANS.COVAGE / / \ 1 LAWN i-w. - 4 -��11 OJ hL M_ EXISTING GRADE 7. ALL MAIN LINES SHALL BE 18'BELOW FINISHED GRADE �°Beall em s°..1 J. •,IC.IC=1 _ -11=14 SLOPE BIDES Of HOLE ORVERRGLSDESATEDGEOF w Mme.aao� \ /�' 11) 1 II II -ILII 11 II I1'— PLOAMNG BED 8. ALL LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 12'BELLOW FlNISHED GRADE. °1 / \ 11 II II 11-11 I1 II 7111= \ / (�1 ^ II II IID JL-�II�II RULE OF THUMB PLANT MATERIAL EXCAVATIONBASED ON Cj II ILII= 11-II= LOCATOR OF PUNT MATER4LL AND DESIGN OF BEDS 9. AL EXPOSED PVC RISERS,IF ANY,SHALL BE GRAY IN COLOR / F I I�v 1 AI A I I �x WI'• OR MEM_PLANT PLACEMENT /\V/ OFROOTBAUL 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL LAY ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT AT Z-17 BELOW THE FINISHED GRADE OF THE TOP OF PAVEMENT. I 0US W WTI {�` 1 DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING EXTEND SLEEVES TO 2,7 BEYOND PAVEMENT. \ / I II 1 /I () NTS 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK THE LOCATION OF ALL SLEEVES AND CONDUIT WITH THE SLEEVING MATERIAL'ELLER'TO I / \ E 2'-0'ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND CAPPED. I 5 _// A \ ARCNEACTO IMPROVE APPEPUD BY EICE(RETAIN . 1 / / II \ NORM. FOS CIES) NCE(RETAIN 12. FABRICATE ALL PIPE TO EM NT FORMULATED TED FOR NWITH CLEAN AND SQUARE CUT JOINTS.USE QUALITY GRADE I / I \ HORN-SINPE FOR SPECIES) PRIMER AND SOLVENT CEMENT FORMULATED FOR INTENDED TYPE OF CONNECTION. \ Pum,TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2'ABOVE ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE 13. BACKFILL ALL TRENCHES WITH SOIL FREE OF SHARP OBJECTS AND DEBRIS. / \ " I P // I �n // ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH,SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE 1 I \ / \ / NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE KEEP 14. ALL VALVE BOXES AND COVERS SHALL BE BLACK IN COLOR. i \ / Ir MULCH MIN.?PROM RANT TRUNK \ 4 6� I / I �_ ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOTBeu LOOSENED r0 15. GROUP VALVE BOXES TOGETHER FOR EASE WHEN SERVICE IS REQUIRED.LOCATE IN PLANT BED AREAS WHENEVER I \ 11 ENSURE PROPER BACKFILL-TO-ROOT CONTACT POSSIBLE. r \( \ Mil I \ 1N`=' '''`�� fJ!j���,`' OUSTING GRADE 18. IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LOCATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ON-SITE WITH OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. CO ==II L,/LIBAI_ SLOPE SIDES OF HCLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF \ II.— De�All PUNT1HV BED Ti. CONTROL WIRES:14 GAUGE DIRECT BURIAL,SOLID COPPER IRRIGATION WIRE.RUN UNDER MAIN LINE USE •/ (9 I001111111‘ I \`J �I'1==---II"-�I 11 2.=11=r—' BACIo-Tu AS PER SPECIFIGTDN MOISTURE-PROOF SPLICES AND SPLICE ONLY AT VALVES OR PULL BOXES.RUN SEPARATE HOT AND COMMON WIRE TO \ J1 X11 —11=11111ie DO NOTocuVATE BELOW ROOTBALL EACH VALVE AND ONE(1)SPARE WIRE AND GROUND TO FURTHEST VALVE FROM CONTROLLER.LABEL OR COLOR CODE _ IC=11 0 CII RULE OF HUMB.MODFVExavATDNB BASED 1-SHLn=11—Ir—�1—n—Ir— ALL WIRES. _ THREE TIMESMADTH�—LOGTX41 of PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS ME [ 1 ,I ,111.0".... -1031, Ell - OF ROOTBAu DaavERkL R'>M PLACEMENT 1B. AVOID OVER SPRAY ON BUILDINGS,PAVEMENT,WALLS AND ROADWAYS BY INDIVIDUALLY ADJUSTING RADIUS OR ARC V %. C ON SPRINKLER HEADS AND FLOW CONTROL ON AUTOMATIC VALVE. Z u�'1 (0:40:: ��� 3 1 O DECIDUOUS&CONIFEROUS SHRUB PLANTING z ,I T.4 } J 2 NTS 19. ADJUST PRESSURE REGULATING VALVES FOR OPTIMUM PRESSURE ON SITE. O z z • 0' 11 20. USE SCREENS ON ALL HEADScii T° � 1 0/ O \►� ' •` / 0 J� 21. A SET OF AS-BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ONSITE Al ALL TIMES IN AN UPDATED CONDITION. Q O O `` 1 - ...7777)411 Z L I N� PUNT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-r ABOVE ABOVE 22 ALL PIPE 3'AND OVER SHALL HAVE THRUST BLOCKING AT EACH TURN. Q M 4\`4 ROCK OR SURROUNDING GRADE RAL LANDSCAPE 23. ALL AUTOMATIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVES WILL HAVE 3'MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3/4'WASHED GRAVEL UNDERNEATHI . W "V, `VCjv\ \1, NOTES PLAN ORGANIC FOR MUMULCH,SEE LCH TYPE KEEP VALVE AND VALVE BOX GRAVEL SHALL EXTENT 3'BEYOND PERIMETER OF VALVE BOX. J ,v / 12-PMD / 1 Q Z_ I F /� MULCH MIN.T FROM RANT STEM O " �\ nl 24. THERE SHALL BE 3'MINIMUM SPACE BETWEEN BOTTOM OF VALVE BOX COVER AND TOP OF VALVE STRUCTURE. / 1 G,. I /,r1 •`� ROOTS AT OUTER EDGE OF ROOIBALL LOOSENED TO J �' 9-KFG \ ENSURE PROPER BACKFu-TORooT CONTACT Q / m 151 ;�I_�I. 11H�T1 EXISTING GOALS w 2 W PRUNE EXIST. -5 ///_ 11 • 1 SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF 1 TO ENSURE MIN.8'-0' ° 3 �1-`b �I � L5n'I�. PUNTING BED Z W 1-1 T IL-'1 IL=O II-1" Bgc CILL AS PER SPECIFICATION / I CLEARANLKS, . ..: -11� I.i,�,y,--i,CIl II110.-�,�11MIIF pp NOT EXCAVATE BELOW R00T8NL J \ 1.I Ilel l II 11=�MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LaanaN of PLANT • SRE VARIES MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT Z O O \\ ,1 SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN PLACEMENT > O /� O PERENNIAL BED PLANTING o U ((�� •1;4 1 NTS v U �V '//� _1I 5 O O 2 iWN,TYP. 3 /- _ - 80.0 � w it cx / \ \\ ,` . a a / • - PRUNE EXIST.TREES \ �\ / HEREBY CERTIFY THATR THIS HWAS T\ / _ TO ENSURE MIN. /,® I / SPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT / CLEARANCE AT ALL ,/ / UPERVISIONAND THATREPORT ��/ WAL. `''� �.... Q / LICENSEDLANDSCAPEARCHITECT UNDER // T1 MI A DULY HE'/� 11 `-11 / THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 1-MMA , / /� - -� -\�, ��: `:.-,i. -1i I' L /0 Patrick J.Sarver ` \ \• � ,, \ \ /, DATE 7/15/16 J.Sarver r 24904 i•s :+ �; _ \ d'9 �/ / \ I— ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY \�� 'tl►Vjr � � \� v �` ,CO /1 LEGEND DATE DESCRIPTION / ]115116 CITY SUBMITTAL 1� �� -� \ \� 1 //' SOD \ '1•1 ,.. .J 1'DIA DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC, \\ 12-PMD \ 5� ■■�� \ SAMPLES REQUIRED T� M/ � i _ i MI /� m `��\ PROPOSED CANOPY d EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS-SEE C\\ D � T SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES • _ 4-TY \ / Mil I - Apip PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB REVISION SUMMARY EDGING,TYP \ \ // I II �/ PLANTING SIZESSCHEOULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND DATE DESCRIPTION \ 4O • /� 9 KFC \ I MN . _ . /—., I\ \\ " �/ SCHEDULE ANDEPLAN FO SPEC SB AND PLANTING SIZES44`�,'41 • ' 5-BES 6 7 �Aiti 11 Q— DECORATIVE BOULDERS,18'-30'DIA. ;RP!, // ' — I =�QLANDSCAPE PLAN laq �� � —rZVL"-11 � tlP I GOPHER STATE ONE CALL NORTH SIDE PLAN, i` , li nreilloraingionarilitaimirke_- f...,,:\. . VW NVGOPHER(�1)454-0002LOCP © NOTES,DETAILS ', F ,.._ CD I \ ONECALLORG (tKXI)252-1188 TOLL FREE ligiratimaklab. III 1'=20'-0' j�� 1VWWIfnt =I •.. r ° ---- II i/ 100® L 1 . 1 / / ‘fi o !Site \ \\ t \ I \ ct IR o U P X ST O 35TH .SUITE 415 ,.(� ST.LOUIS PARK.MN 55d16 \ b• \ V GIVMSIN:GR,...r. �6 e/h , \\\ .■■�.r• �o,° 891 it III 9� ' Matt Paw* Pal Saner 763-213-3944 952-250-2003 01 7‹ ! M 57 on 0 in ill •. `� shea \ •��' � CL • \\ CONTR(1CTOR TO PROVIDE **too* 2 //���\ �� \ i INL TEGTION AT ALL *Ofel., ...• in \ • \ �r3, \ \ ••u�TREAM CATCH ■■� � �� i I •••XV \ \ ,S S 11 t co• --,.... \ \ 1 . in 497 1.0m0•0096.61.006ot•66462 I \ \ \\t . • 6�, fid, i \ S �� . 9 9 O `- / ED 1,,, 0, ' . v � ,9 8g0'� N .-„, ' .11io 1, ,96 , i \ c9' ,/ 13 1 �0)° \ •I 1 // G X.v g, vv 30.4 - ;1 '/ I \ \ 1. .1 IS / 00. -9 ' IJ X • N. 88/7.9 4\ \\ /, ,\ 96�t • 9�,• O \ \\ N �o�• II• SWPPP NOTES: F... a 4. J 30.E , • \ \ \ / 1.SEE SHEETS SW1.0-SW7.3 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, Z / \ \ \/ ---"--- t • IA / - DESCRIPTIONS,AND PRACTICES. I' < 0- PERIMETER • A \�� X ( • I /' W WEROSION(IONTROL \ • 2.SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION \ �' �\ o t pp��� O CONTROL NOTES. '(0Q 'JZ \,,, AT CONSTRUCTION \ (�� k\ \ PE�QIMETER OJZ_\\ LIMITS,TYPtt ' \ \ • �9 \\ I _ tp N CONTRO� 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, R' id 2 \\ \r� 1 F�F \ 4,:/9 `Y'n ,e ONSTRUCTIO / INSPECTIONS,AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. ?> pj % % T �\ • \ - )'i ' b LIMI TYP. �� / W 2 W EL=490. \ \ X889.3 FF o .1 // a } z Z Lj \ : \ ;� 1 C)- EL=890�,`��' •1 \ ' 9� B n� \\\�/� 4) ( 1 (n CITY OF EDINA EROSION CONTROL NOTES: Z ¢ 0 0 .( /�LJ A y\ ` O9'1 X X X •1 �. _ C 4 -- -� 1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. p r 0 v� %v• v� v, (R � 6 \ •.� O 1s o U 1.1 S 9\ \t — v 85.9 • \.�\ ,L �\ 100, \ 6 / • > LEGEND: ~ ' \\\\\ • \\ -\\ l �P '•••• �� ` \ 9O (—\ M X,/ . D ( 9 gap EX.1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL , ` \ �� a X \ �\ �& �6 •••••-s: 11 ` ' / I '� 932 1'CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL a ••••• .-V--.., �� \ ft. \ '� Sl • • • '� • 1 X �,..9 I I x.9 EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION re D. i ,c\ A.::::::::::::.. >, \ I \ •••••••••••••• \ <Q9 `�x�r, • / --932.0 PROPOSED SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 1 SPECHEREBY (CATION OR RE ORT wn5 ��\\ ,C\ \\\ :❖:❖=•=❖• \\ •� I • N. �I / PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MV DIRECT _ N DRAINAGE ARROW SUPERVISION AND THAT(AMA DULY -'' '')' •7)\----- 885.94 _-, . , \ •,�\ ••••••••••••••• • C� I SILT FENCE/BIOROLL-GRADING LIMIT CENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ___ • • • • • • • \ I ° UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ''''''(1 Cb. • •••,••A�•••••••, j 6: \ VVVIII ' %8 8 6.4 3 G ° �'� • • • .�• • 9 \ / STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE \ •-• i`• •••••='•ro,• t.•••Ai,� 'O��(\ �� \ )r •_._._•_•_•.•.•_•_•_•_ Ma ew R.Pavek \ / -- .4 �_•.4�•-�life•eire. /`( 9G� •• \ •••• DATE 7/15/16 LICENSE NO.44263 �i' CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE -��••••••••••��•,•/ \ /11 v ,\ ••I I �'-- 0 PROPOSED MANHOLE OR TCH BASIN ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY XCP '-- - .�.,"•••••••_ \ \\ \ III /-�-- Si.• ►� PROPOSED GATE VALVE DATE DESCRIPTION • I .�. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ]n&16 CITY SUBMITTAL ���•4•e• / 888.40 )~� PROPOSEDSANITAf2YSEWER �'\ X66 \'J:, 886.94 --- ':•_ `_ .. \ -6 r __-B-8-7-- ` t.Q� \�� \` 0, 11 it-: / —�1>^� PROPOSED STORM SEWER // _ 887. �- \\ X J��� �' EXISTING STORM SEWER / ��_�r' ��\ '� �� \ X k a • \/I --I i— EXISTING WATER MAIN " ', _•-, '�.�'•� 11 `� �n/\n - - � -- - EXISTING GAS MAIN \\ �� \• \ �'\ _Q_ l w'\ - - -k--- EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC �� ��\ 7 887.370• ' — 1 �� — " EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE • X ' / O •.�■ REVISION SUMMARY / "Ca , __ 0 EXISTING MANHOLE I EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX 6Sl \� / O) N I ■ , i-- -- DATE DESCRIPTION 9' 6> CD i�' 0 �� ❑ EXISTING CATCH BASIN 3,E` EXISTING LIGHT \ \ \ \ 'I SrcX i�� X`� Y/ N 'c�j O �'6\' \��' > I I 4..u. \ EXISTING HYDRANT 4 EXISTING GAS METER \ / \ ry,J���\\\ > O EXISTING STOPBOX o EXISTING GAS VALVE \ , (Q �v_� 5 \\ /O o I I \.. ® EXISTING GATE VALVE \ • O \\ �/74 / 0 SWPPP-EXISTING , \ . \ \\\ a/-7`/ .9X cam_-j/ .,c/ I \ GOPHER STATE ONE CALL CONDITIONS //J V 11 WP.WGOPHERSTATEONECALL.OREG o� o �/�� \ S \ I 88�.85G S V V . 0 \ X 887.180 \ 3eiris OVERFLOW IS34 OF THE CURB Civil,S ite BOX HEIGHT FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED G R O l/ P �� ay3l w.35TH ST surtt zoo .4op. OVERFLOW AT TOP Cf LLER AS SPECIFIED 4531W 55655 MN 55416 FILTER ASSEMBLY CIVIS11eGreup.corn z FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH Man Po-39 Pat server EXISTING CURB,PLATE,BOX, 2'OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO �E3-2133840 Bsz-2sazao3 AND GRATE EXISTING GROUND ��: --•- EMBED 2'OFDRTO ft0 ',..SURFACE DIRECTION OF FLOW Ally 1=11.11'„ llel�FIIll.��.l 1 11,,11., 1= _,,_ :_ ,_ Shea xrx WOODEN STAKES ON GRO18'UND. MIN.PLACED D O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND.IF INSTALLED ON ,.�,;.• FILTER ASSEMBLY DIAMETER,0" PVMT.PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT +t•" ON-GRADE 10"AT LOW POINT MIN.10'0.C. NOTE: 1.COMPOST FLIER LOGS(BIO ROLLS)SHALL BE FILTRX EROSION CONTROL 50)01 OR APPROVED EQUAL. ..,."°caw..M°°' Infersuoi �•�•�'•�' EX 2.COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40%GRADE 2(SPEC 3890)AND 80%-70% e1"" ""'"� •°'°9 ;fit•;'_' HIGH-FLOW FABRIC PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS.PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3.FLIER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX OPENINGS OF 3/8". NOTES: 4.IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED,OVERLAP BY PAIN.12"AT ENDS AND STAKE. I.REPLACE INLET GRATE UPON COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF INLET PROTECTION FABRIC. 5.SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80%OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE SURFACE OF TIE SYSTEM BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND AT THE COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT. 3.REFERENCE APPLE VALLEY STANDARD PLATE ERO-4C. OCURB INLET FILTER C)SEDIMENT BIO-ROLL/COMPOST FILTER LOG NTS NTS 30 FROM EDGE OF ROAD P.i .iiii ii:....... TO FRONT OF SFEED BUMP ra • '•- 35 R i.; ;�:��' 3 ZO ��:�� 4!t!Gce T" FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET rr O Ii:. y a�: -. I � � w I AS SPECIFIED, r` TO CONSTRUCTION re. �' '-•- �� ""::�- rc METAL POST AS 7:1- AREA AREA T .74 I: '? `. I SPECIFIED• . LO LO �,,- 0 �:�_ Z .r�'`• L �� - m SUPPORT NET:12 GAUGE 4"x 4' FILTERTQWIRE FABRICSUPPORT AS SPECIFIEDNETWITH SECURE O Z Z METAL •'` C7 WIRE HOOKED ONTO PREFORMED CHANNELS ON � -�: CLIPS 12'O.C. PLAN I 35'R • 6"MIN CRUSHED STONE X POSTS AS SPECIFIED. Q Q Q 0 TO CONSTRUCTION AREA w ANCHOR FABRIC WITH EXISTING SOIL,TAMP BACKFILL W 75'MINIMUM EXISTING GROUND Cl) W UNDISTURBED SURFACE DIRECTION OF FLOW V, Q J Z FINISHED GEOTEXTILEFLTER 41 SPEED 1B•WOE O J SPEED BUMP II GRADE FABRIC Gln. , b Gln. cr •. •-: i• -,7- CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET I .Y•-YY i• 1�-•- 11 u ,� n 1 Vii•: DOWN INTO TRENCH J _ IIhJI Ilrl!=A II II 11A�114i 14o— Iletiiailnllkall II ,(• B W = W II=-71 II II II II 11=11 11=11 II 11 1 irwr I=ll 11 II I .—. `g '�I.lf.11111ir--1.=111.1111 111.II��.11.11:11:1111.�1JI'I dR110�1111.11117111.I1.�I.II.�IJf1111 Z z 1 1 I 1 —e 1 I E—I' n—n1111—H—n— METAL POSTS 8'A"O.C. 1 } W MAX. Q PROFILEZ O SEDIMENT FENCE > ° NOTES: NTS O 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED o ° Q ROADWAY. 0 V = 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT 0 ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY.THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING 0 STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE m 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MV MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED,DROPPED,WASHED,OR TRACKED BE REMOVED AS ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL U DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. w 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. a 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2'DIA CLOSE GRADED,AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. D: D. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. O STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS SPECIFICATION,OR REPORTWAS 2 PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT N T S SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MI ESOTA. B. TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, MATTING IN A TRENCH 4'OR 10'SPACING,4'DOWN FROM MORE IN DEPTH M ew R.Pavek TRENCH DATE 7/15/16 LICENSE NO.44263 .,, •�4,.• e` I,`. ISSUE/SUBMITTALSLIMMARY 'C' OVERLAP:BURY UPPER E 1 DATE DESCRIPTION OF LOWER STRIP AS IN'A' 7/15/16 CITU SUBMITTAL TOPENO OF L STRIP 4"AND STAPLE. ��`:• l'F�•%'',:•/, ,/ • / NOTE: 1. ACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO ....4 j/ SOIL TING FIRMLY PRESSED TO DATE DESCRI PTION SUMMARY 'D' EROSION SSCP.FOLD H MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED.DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. 1 --o11{" • PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART _b TYPICAL STAPLE 48 - - TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY GAUGE WIRE _ PRESSED TO SOIL O3 EROSION BLANKET SWPPP-DETAILS NTS SW1 .2 • GENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS AND NOTES: TRAINING(PART III.A.2) OWNER INFORMATION ivilSite THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE NEED FOR REMOVAL.THE WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP OR AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST.WHEN WRITTEN DESIGN ENGINEER MATTHEW RPAVEK P.E. OWNER: IOENTFED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP)MUST COMPLY WITH TIE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION CORRESPONDENCE CAN NOT BE OBTAINED IN A TIMELY MANNER,THE SPECIFIC INLET PROTECTION CAN BE REMOVED TO ALLEVIATE THE IMMEDIATE SAFETY CONCERN. TRAINING COURSE:DESIGN SWPPP TOWN HALL GROUP SYSTEM(NPDESIGENERAL PERMIT(DATED AUGUST 1,2013#MNR100001 PAGES 1.35)AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND HOWEVER,EFFORTS TO OBTAIN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE MUST BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP AND AVAILABLE WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST.PERMISSION TO TRAINING COURSE: OF OFMINNESOTA 4810CHALL TAP AVENUES 4931 W.35M ST.SUITE 200 SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. REMOVE INLET PROTECTION BASED ON A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN MUST STILL BE OBTAINED FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUMORErY WIMN 30 DAYS OF REMOVAL. ST.LOUS PARK,MN 55416 INSTRUCTOR:JOHN CHAPMAN MINNEAPOUS,MN 55417 CiviIG050roup.com PART III STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS,AND DATES OF TRAINING COURSE 511512011-5/18/2011 CONTACT. Man Pavek Pat Sarver CANNOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS,INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS,OR CONDUITS AND DITCHES UNLESS THERE IS A TOTAL TRAINING HOURS:12 7632133944 952-250-2003 BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER RECERTIFICATION:1/13/14-1/13/14(8 HOURS),EXP.5012017 TBD SWPPP(PART IIIA) VEHICLE TRACKING OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION GTE(OR ONTO STREETS WITHIN THE SITE)MUST BE MINIMIZED BY BEES SUCH AS STONE PADS,CONCRETE OR THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WLL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECFICATIONS.SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS STEEL WASH RACKS,OR EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS.STREET SWEEPING MUST BE USED IF SUCH BAPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO AND SWPPP NARRATIVE(ATTACHMENT A CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE)FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION.THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES TIE STREET(SEE PART IV.E 4.D.) OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLIPS.STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.DOCUMENT. AREAS AND QUANTITIES(PART II I.A.4.B&C): �J h e a THE PERMITEE MUST MINIMIZE SOL COMPACTION AND,UNLESS INFEASIBLE,PRESERVE TOPSOIL.MINIMIZING SOIL COMPACTION IS NOT REWIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: TIE SPECIFIC AREA OF THE SITE DICTATES THAT IT BE COMPACTED.METHODS FOR MINIMIZING COMPACTION INCLUDE THE USE OF TRACKED EQUIPMENT,AND STAYING OFF OF C 1.INSTALL STABIUZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AREAS TO BE LEFT UN-COMPACTED.METHODS TO PRESERVE TOPSOIL INCLUDE STRIPPING AND STOCKPILING TOPSOIL PRIOR TO GRADING OR EXCAVATION OPERATIONS. 2.INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3.INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS. THE PERMITTEE MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS AS REQUIRED IN MUMS.OF THIS PERMIT. 4.CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN/POND INSTALL 5.CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN/POND(PART 1118) DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING(PART IV.D): _ 8.CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE an s•..r 7.STRIP STOCKPILEGOF TOPSOIL �°'i'.;:: � � DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING(E.G,PUMPED DISCHARGES,TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE)RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT MAY HAVE TURBID OR ela wa.au. a �e. 8.ROUGH GRADINGSITE SEDIMENT LADEN DISCHARGE WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TOA TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE.IF THE B.. ADENUDED AREAS WA STOCKPILES WATER CANNOT BE DISCHARGED TOA SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING THE SURFACE WATER,IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BLIP'S SUCH THAT THE 10.INSTALL SANITARYSEWER,WATER MAIN STORMD WER AND SERVICES DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE RECEIVING WATER,DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS OR WETLANDS.THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT DISCHARGE POINTS 11.INSTALL SILT FENCE I INLET PROTECTION AROUND CBS ARE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SCOUR THE DISCHARGE MUST BE DISPERSED OVER NATURAL ROCK RIPRAP,SAND BAGS,PLASTIC SHEATHING OR OTHER 12.INSTALL STREET SECTION 13.INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER ACCEPTED ENERGY DISSIPATION MEASURES.ADEQUATE SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE REQUIRED FOR DISCHARGE WATER THAT CONTAINS SUSPENDED SOLIDS. 14.FINAL GRADEINOUS B STREETS FILTER BACKWASH WATERS MUST BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL RETURNED TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS,OR INCORPORATE INTO THE STEIN A 15.RFEMOVE E MULATERSEDSTALL SEED BASIAND N I POND MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION.DISCHARGE OF THE BACKWASH WATER TO SANITARY SEWER IS ALLOWED WITH PERMISSION OF THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY. 120.REMOVE ACCO MLAATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN I 17.FINAL GRADE POND I INFILTRATION BASINS(DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.)(PMT III.C) 18.WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING,REMOVE SET FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE(PART IV.E): RECORDS RETENTION(PART II I.E): THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE AT ALL TIMES FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND PROPER OPERATION OF EROSION MD SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ATA MINIMUM,INSPECT,MAINTAIN AND REPAIR ALL DISTURBED SURFACES AND ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FACILITIES AND SOIL STABLIZATION MEASURES ONCE THE SWPPP(ORIGINAL OR COPIES)INCLUDING,ALL CHANGES TO IT,AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY EVERY SEVEN(7)DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A RAINFALL OF 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER AND WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER THAT.CONTINUE THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE.THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR INH ON SITE VEHICLE DURING INSPECTION ACTIVITIES UNTL LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITY HASCEASED.THEREAFTER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THESE RESPONSIBILITIES AT LEAST WEEKLY UNTIL NORMAL WORKING HOURS. VEGETATIVE COVER IS ESTABLISHED.INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABLED AREAS,EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BAPS AND INFILTRATION AREAS. ALL OVMER(S)MUST KEEP THE SWPPP,ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS,ON FILE FOR THREE(3)YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN BASED ON INSPECTION RESULTS THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY THE SWPPP IN ORDER TO PREVENT POLLUTANTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE VIA STORM WATER RUNOFF.THIS PART II.C.THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. MODIFICATION MUST BE MADE WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS OF THE INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT,LEGAL REGULATORY,OR NOTE QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. 1.THE FINAL SWPPP; INSPECTION REPORTS MUST BE RECORDED WITHIN 24 HOURS IN WRITING AND KEPT ON FILE BY THE CONTRACTOR AS M INTEGRAL PART OF THE SWPPP ON SITE AND THEN 2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROTECT; FOR AT LEAST 3 YEARS FROM THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. SWPPP CONTACT PERSON r ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE REPAIRED,REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 12 OF THE HEIGHT u') 3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTKN(SEEPARTIV.E.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); OF THE DEVICE.THESE REPAIRS MUST BE MADE BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY,OR THEREAFTER AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. CONTRACTOR: SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: Z U) 4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN MPLESENTED,INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY,CONTRACTS,COVENANTS AND OTHER ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A 0Z z BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE:AND REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS,INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS.CATCH BASINS,AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS,AND RESTABILIZE THE PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2 AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED TOPSOIL THIS REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MIST TAKE PLACE WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. 5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. BY LEGAL REGULATORY,OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THEco CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP Z a J PART IV.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS SEE(ATTACHMENT A CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE)FOR SITE SPEGFIC INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. Q5 < a POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT(PART IV.F): r LLI ~ w W EROSION PREVENTION(PART E): PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT o J z THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES ON THE SITE', Q THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANING FOR AND IMPLEMENTING APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION PHASING,VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS,HORIZONTAL SLOPE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 0 J GRADING,AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION,SO THAT THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF PART N.E.ARE COMPLES WITH. SCUD WASTE:COLLECTED SEDIMENT,ASPHALT AND CONCRETE MILLINGS,FLOATING DEBRIS,PAPER,PLASTIC.FABRC,CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS AND OTHER PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.THE anmi IX Q 2 THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE DELINEATED(E.G.WITH FLAGS,STAKES.SIGNS,SILT FENCE ETC.)ON THE DEVELOPMENTSITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS. WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY MD MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY(MPCA)DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. 4.J I (6- ALL ALL EXPOSED SOL AREAS MUST BE STABLIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE NEXT WORK DAY WHEN HAZARDOUS MATERIALS:OIL GASOLINE,PAINT AND ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES MUST BE PROPERLY STORED,INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT,TO PREVENT SPILLS, LL1 Lu SWPPP ATTACHMENTS(ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE ISIACRE OR GREATER): Q Z EARTH-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES WILL CEASE FOR AT LEAST 14 DAYS.TEMPORARY STOCKPLES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT,CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS(E.G.,CLEAN LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE.RESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT VANDALISM.STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MUST AGGREGATE STOCKPILES,DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES,SAND STOCKPILES)AND THE CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS,PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR BEN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. = W W SURFACES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS REQUIREMENT BUT MUST COMPLY WTH PART N.C.S. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE: EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE.RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTEWATER ATTACHMENT A.CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE-SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT J W > SOILS WITHIN 200 FEET OF A PUBLIC WATER(AS DESIGNATED BY THE MINNESOTA DNR)MUST BE STABILIZES WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMES. PROPERLY DISPOSED OF.NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. ATTACHMENT B.CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST 7 ; 0 O ATTACHMENT C.MAINTENANCE PLANFOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS L THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROM ANY PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE,OR CONCRETE WASHOUT:ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR ATTACHMENT 0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT-ON RLE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 0 Q DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE SITE,MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE,OR FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO ANY SURFACE WATER. IMPERMEABLE LINER A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW WASHOUT LIQUIDS TO ENTER THE GROUND IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER THE LIQUID AND ATTACHMENT E:GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT-ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER.AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 0 U STABIUZATON OF THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND,MID THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS.LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES LO MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS.A SIGN MUST BE NSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACIUTY TO INFORM CONCRETE 0 At = STABILIZATION OF THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES ORSWALES MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES.CONCRETE WASHOUT MAY ALSO OCCUR OFF SITE ACCORDING TO THE APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: U SURFACE WATER AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. ID FUELING OPERATION PLAN:ALL FUELING SIAL TAKE PLACE AT THE DESIGNATED FUELING LOCATION AND ACCORDING TO BEST PRACTICES FOR SITE FUELING OPERATIONS AS L- TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES THAT ARE BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM(MATH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK DITCH CHECKS,BIO ROLLS, TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SPILLS. THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN 1.0 ACRES SOLI NPDES PERMIT IS NOT REQUIRED. c0 SILT DIKES ETC.)DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILVED.THESE AREAS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER NO LONGER BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM SPILL PREVENTION PLAN:ASPILLS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP AFTER DISCOVERY.THE SITE SUPERINTENDENT,WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DAY-TO-DAYONSITE w CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WILL BE THE SPILL PREVENTION COORDINATOR AND WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING CLEAN UP PROCEDURES,POSTING CLEAN UP PROJECT NARRATIVE: PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. RECOMMENDATIONS,AND ENSURING PROPER CLEAN UP TRAINING OF APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL. ce a a SEED NOTES(PART IIIAA.A): SANITARY AND SEPTIC WASTE:SANITARY/SEPTIC FACILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED IN A NEAT MPROJECT ISA REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING GAS STATION SITE INTO A RESTAURANT.SITE,GRADING AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL a.D SANITARY CONDITION,FOR THE USE OF THE CONTRACTORS OCCUR EMPLOYEES.A LICENSED SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED BY STATE REGULATIONS WILL COLLECT SANITARY WASTE FROM PORTABLE UNITS. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ANDOT SEEDING MANUALSPECIFICATION,OR REPORT WAS SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC(IF REQUIRED): PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT FINAL STABILIZATION(PART IV.G): AND AM A DULY GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION: SUPERVISIONUPERVAND THATl M ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOL SHALL BE TILLED TOA MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3INGIES. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING THE DEFINITIONS IN THE NPDES GENERAL PERMTPMTNSECTION O.THE CONTRACTOR A.STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION Kat)WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER FINAL STABILIZATION IS COMPLETE OR WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER SELLING THE SITE OR PORTON OF THEMI 1ESOTA. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING,MULCHING&BLANKET. SITE(THAT HAS NOT UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION)TO ANOTHER PARTY.A COPY OF THIS NOTICE OF TERMINATION I PERMIT MODIFICATION FORM MUST GO TO THE NEW LATER THAN SEVEN(7)DAYS AFIERTHE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY NTHAT PORTION OFTHE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY ORPERMANENRY OWNER THE ORIGINAL CURRENT OWNER MUST PROVIDE A SWPPP TO THE NEW OWNER THAT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES THE REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.SEE TIE CEASED. SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE(ATTACHMENT A:CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE)AND SWPPP PLAN SHEETS FOR FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURES B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN PART III.C.MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SEED SERVE MI AREA WITH FIVE(5)OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. • TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112(WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP)FOR WINTER AND 21-111(OATS COVER CROP)FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. Ma ew R.Pavek BOTH SEED MOSS SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE 2. POST CONSTRUCTION:THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME THAT MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE BY THE PROJECT'S PERMANENTSTORMWATER DATE 7/15/16 UOLNSE No.44263 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN PART IIID.SHALL BE ONE(1)INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE MULCH PROJECT.SEE PART 111.5.1.FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INFILTRATION DESIGN,PROHIBITIONS AND APPROPRIATE SITE CONDITIONS. • IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING,WITHIN 24 HOURS,MNDOT TYPE I MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION.MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY AT 90%COVERAGE(2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: DATE DESCRIPTION 7/15/16 CITY SUBMITTAL SLOPES • 3:1 HORIZNERT.)OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH PERMANENT SEED MIX • FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MX. • SLOPESSTEEPERFOR ORE,D 5.1 OR DITCH BOTTOMSOTESHALLBEROSIONDWITHOL TREASIONTMENTS. CONTROL BANKER. •• AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR N WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261(STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST)AT 35LBS PER • SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. , ACRE. DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35221(DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL)AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. '' SEDIMENT CONTROL(PART IV.C): • MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. ' SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING SURFACE WATERS.INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. . a.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS THAT ARE DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM(E.G.,DITCHES WITH ROCK CHECK DAMS)REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. REVISION SUMMARY b.IF THE DOWN GRADIENT TREATMENT SYSTEM IS OVERLOADED,ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BAPS MUST BE INSTALLED TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING,AND THE SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN PART ILA4,A THROUGH C. DATE DESCRIPTION , c.IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN SHEET'FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES,THERE SHALL BE NO UNBROKEN SLOPE LENGTH OF GREATER THAN 75 FEET FOR SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 3:1 OR STEEPER. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT CORD DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN.THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABUSHED N ACCORDANCE WITH PART N.G. THE TIMING OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING,OR SWPPP-NARRATIVE PASSAGE OF VEHICLES.ANY SHORT-TERM ACTMTY MUST BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED.HOWEVER,SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED BY APPROPRIATE BAPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL ALL SOURCES WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET HAVE BEEN STABILIZED.INLET PROTECTION MAY BE REMOVED FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IFA SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN(STREET FLOODING/FREEZING)HAS BEEN IDENTIFED AND S, n '/� a THE PERMITTEE(S)HAVE RECEIVED WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY(E.G.CITYDOUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MNDOT ENGINEER)VERIFYING THE V\V/ I 2:JNHOO 1SV2HIHON N011dn2-1D HIflOS rr '''''l'it '''''',.:,,,.X.-N":0,',,rfi)Ve::1",'''''t'ir '"M:•,%,'4,44'Z.'44#,' '..40.1.- �..,.....,,.,. v } r � .',,..';'--.A-'-'144...":',,,,!--'71 :',.;.::;: , tzea gy. p " 5[ , • ;. .,, ✓. p£ 3 F�' F jt �if G. y Y fr,,7.,,,,,,,,,Si r r CP ` --.4 .,,,w-- +✓ . .. — rZ-MI r — .. 'a 1.4 r"" , 'r MI 4,' 'nnno- �. ,...,......�. ir«.. 3 .. 44 4,1-rs r '?.,�a? _ _ �'';�} fit ,, ` ) " • 1 1 V IDN2IO0 1SV3H1flOS2:13N2IOO 1S2MHIflOS r.ye s a', .- ..e aM -' a ^ • ' liallii. '.. ' y�^.[d'y :fy� ,,,,' , ; �. r _ 1 .xry , t • 1 :� • 79017-• -A 41-ladetell lit- +6 • . g, j�, tww ;. 1stilia I_L— wr. ....,... 4' 41 SIM SDOVWI DlIS ONILSIX2 N O IIVIS 11VH NMOL TOWN HALL STATION BUILDING MATERIALS EXISTING BRICK TO BE PAINTED CHARCOAL GRAY EXISTING PORCELAIN PANELS TO REMAIN ABOVE BRICK. PAINT WILL BE REMOVED TO REVEAL EXISTING ORIGINAL WHITE AND RED PORCELAIN. RED 'EYEBROW' PROJECTING FROM SURFACE TO BE RESTORED alliftummok 1:;-. .„t r- ik .� � � F- zy p !1�• j• ^ri I. , :.;;;,..''' m; :,, . 4t, , ' '' a. • r rt. . - ‘• fr' • _ „. a • �.� p .,,-.4,:i ,,oba. }t 1!,{64 .:. "�, r X ..ill. r ,0 it s € r't` 'c a'-. ' R y r F .: . ill ' ,' . ' 11t j.It f 7 Xassmor r fIR s Or k *- mi - e 1 - , ., , ,- › j o0,„,....„ ,, ,. . _ , , , . . , ., , ......„ m 0 " 1m L. D '..b 'I� m ExteriorRenderingTown Hall & Bar11 Restaurant Bar Edina MN P.' t , S 4 TOWN HALL = ; s " • .4 �. �r! (1:1 l'3,1:4:::7".::::: : � �' -'441,..''''' rte Jss: ' i'. * .!."ii, 4- S 0 ,� �{ .I x.'ti ., ,.. , ai♦ S • • ,V fi � ,. 'i y _ ► �' t�`� iii'^_�' ..i' r4 ,yli yi t, 1 . Al • t I C. 1. t' FULL SERVICE lit *-$44` : , • ..� SAME PRICE ��N ,, p""`4.1 i y 1----------------'- y — �r qtr e� \,i i. � � eA 41 � +'fit 'fit Y. e. • ` J. 1 .• r •. 3 -� - _. ase, ---,AA — S f , - t , rie { _-, i 1 • S r 4 PA , , --: ',...._ ---' ' 1 , a 'P��, ,- y ._ IA✓. - Nr r• .�� ..q ik - 7 �i ` - th w ,.., g. ' ' ,,, fit , _v .c .. , • e s , RkC Exterior Rendering ,. e._.:90eWs. uHrcal_nTwitl..:8441Bat..,a:r0:r1 - 4 "••• s..h ea,.1, la. ,,..0,. E:I il:a 7:, 14 , - ' 1/4,iN le * ... _ , k -.._ . f ', - ...- - • t 1. ' ..„ --- 04 -\ ., '• , ' O'I.-• - k ' f,.; fsix.- 't '`' • '''' -'; I' '' (.• 4/164.' * .4 It - s i _ v •.'. _ . . , 414 *-16.., 4-- - ' I --• -.4,..„_4,10.. . -4 - i 47.,_, ,.. r t , • ,•.,,, ... im .. 4. .4.- . --4'.---7, , it, -1 -•••••,- ,r,, .-.1-f* . .• ' 'OW, ` *41f.F211-; 4 .e' - oficy .,, \..,..., I'tf'',. --1 '' + ,, . ..,--4... ,,, -- ‘... -41,11. : ''• r! f, -i„--- ; ;'• , .', . , A-;- - , , - -_,,.,- -•.,\ ..% . _ , .,,- ...: .-'•., -A' - r ". • or . , t \ - - -:-i--,•-'1Y1. 4, '7.1 '• " - . t , • --) ,‘„,"17.61411,-:,•.. . . i ' .,•., •• S',1 e , . v.& St: ..-ti. b'• I , ,". "Ir '-': 1..e.... / ‘gtiLl **,,,,,: --14, • !OIL, • kblI . r 1 --. • , . '* e . .#7. 41 •. . 44*:.ikt , , , ' - .__ .,...._ ,, ... .„..., ,4„,....., . , • '!--...- • ,,,, -- ,-,,-- , ,,... , , - "— ,,,,,,,, 4 4. • 4 di -r , Oft• ol"• -- -, 14.`,-*-' . ;,. .i :-"*..:4:, - - 'A -.• Y,I 4---"'", g-'"--&--,L---- 0 CAL := -:;;;-' '°.r- , /, _ ' ,, • . - • , . •* *• i 2 =„4 •,',"-, 4. ,- ,. 4 4. . . *i. . .- . I 0 ' ... i.• ..... _ , MIIIINIMIIIIIRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIMIIIIIMIIIMIMUIIMI • , ' V 4 r.-. . 4 0', - -- ---.-- , it'."...--- 1";1111iiiir'#*,a ."" . . • ,,........'......... .„Y-'..Zii:'44-Le ..r*"-. • . Z, 31;Z. . ',..4.„, •.,,,,•,,, ;jr,,:_: r;fti,,,,.,. .,..,.41°-4--...e: 4+7 0 ;' -.....-4 .;---,,.r.... ,11- , __ , , lik__„Ai.... .,-. or-- , %', I _ to. ._ Aki-- - toNitiris ,q tt _ _ . .. __ .____.__ 11, _ _ 4.... * -7:5 •-: ••`'' '.1.;t41'1,' l'•*-*.-.i_.'-'.. .'.. • 40* :7',7 *"44-;'*•`--„cti -............---_ _ • - ...., -,`,11.:.-1,:,:- - -,4vA7-4 ''' ' ' ' '4::* ` - .1 .4" _____...........00511 t •14 •• ---,,,, 1 - . - i'- 911111r-4 _ . To ARV --::*#.-f-....•.-- _4111/161141.0 411111111111.00. ., -..-, ..-r•-- -.,., -,*,„„), ,,,,,.,,,,,f ,C....e '..A.,•-- „dell'„,e4.,,,W,,..',.. .7:, :".. .-'4' `• ,",t*k. t`,.."' •:,#.2c :• ,,,, , ,,"tk,C.,,,-;.:'....V','„„" '''• : ,,,,.., ,,-., :-•. . _,.. -- - . . v--4 "Itk.— . _,,,,+,,,,,„ _,;4,-,,vorie' 4,„...01.-— •.- - - n+,, _ -.-„,- - -....',i- -.. ,-"".,..!-'t' ,,, 0%-,. ,... ,.. ,-,0-11.,..,-. ,„„ag,46.4.,,,,--- 4.- :-..---. , ,-. .. ,. .. - - _-.. . "* 0f"..;'' 4 4 ---= ' '. - wittoragRr • :i ,, . , ,.. - : i:).:. ,.. ...,..2.,›; .. .,...,: ,..v,.,.4,7 ...;:.., . .3... .,,,..„.".... .,,.,:ty. - .... „, ... . ._ , . „ . , „,-;- •. --• -4 4.,- :- ,, , .,-4 .,* ;:,,,-,-,a, -4- „, '- ' t -, - .•,. ' ''' ' * - :1 #*" 4,-.,,;•' : . ", --,••••" ....----- -- ..,",. - ,.. 's " • „.....-:`,$.‘-t_,,,..-t, -..."--, - .• „..:"K" ; .;"'Nr.7"'--*-7'41E-' • -; . . S __ •..-• :7,--r.,•-_4",--7,-Apg: . . • , ''., -; ' `,,-*„. ''''• -, , 4"--', ,,,,., 4.4"-e,.,'444.`",?4,1 -,A*0',„%.-*.,":-.' " ' *I' 47:4;",,,I - "Ili lii , :..?.14't o 1:-it , '1.1°>:-4" . cr 'r . ::#: .,,,,,, ..4....*„. 444' -1"--k-'7%,:e-')w%,--;',-1";',. ' - 4-t„. „,,,, - • , . 4.,,,,11....-- •.d. 1--./...e3,;.-•:---',...t.--;,..5*..s..4-.' .,,,,.t?„ ..'4 TIttit - .1,'".--,t ,.4 ...„, , „.e.„3j,,„- , ..,, ,,,,..,--..-- -,..„-7,.. • 44.-:s , . . , - iirk4•:t-,4;48, t,st.„,„, s . , . . , ,. _,. , --,1 t-.4. . 7 :4,-fi.-ir----0,440,-f",,-;. , , -„,-....-- ....., - . it' '- —,...i. 4#0...., (s,,, N , ..,, , ti, Station tairoi Exterior Rend r- iis:' nEdina IVIN cD Town z , . .7. -,. -.- ,.. -- ..';". .114 .L - M •:',, ^41-z!4‘.7. :e, •,-:.:., -.;;' ..-"' kilt 4-, ,, 4. - ...I .4.4. !: ' '' ':‘- ' ''' ' 471. 4 = , 1., ':;i'lC:: -;,,,J ' 4i.,_,,, . , 4 I - •t. . -. —— , ' :, STilu . . . 1, • ,, _ , _ ... , 1 .. . . . . .,.. , _ _ _ ., .. „ , . .„ _ ___ _-....,_. th. 44 - . , X, 'P • , - . , ,... ,..„ ----- -,_. .., i .... ,r.., . 1 ..-- 44 i ilia!, %.,-`' A ' f• •- -,_. r”: "Ir. r, " •a . t ,. lt • , .. 4 •.: k% V st — . t ...." tt,, --- , -- _'. **'*.' ari ---* ' * — ...At . 4 airt% Sit . i , ....----- ,, , --'.-s x', -, -4 ,L- I ,4%...k i'll 41 1 .• .. , ' I , ^ _, ,..:1,, F.,:.: 47:1 * ill a ' , , --v. . . 4 .4 h ,.„.. ,. i :.,, --,..._,,,,„ , '," = . ---'. _ . . .. , 411E. . _ , Ma .fr, r- ., , A - -. . ' .,....-t.# 4killiOtagitkik 41Z t -Jo, ..-i, -,_•---,:\*-1P.,..L,',..e4It'k,' A* ' * T=.7_::______.---- -------,T— __ ---- * . - f,- ..„, .,,,, ,. • , ,..4 .f.ritt0.4 i; . -. ,, ...„ .,, — _ , ....* ., - - .- r:::.- 1 'cl-,-.:'1=.::;.' 'p - ~ .;••-'r,' ,:-....p,-- -%‘ :, .404,t),..4,4'*... ,. .1s. -.,.:._- ,:- 1.''..,v------, .4) .„4-3,,,,,„:,:-...... --- . . . _ , t'A.--- •,..-, , --_--74-_-- -,,;;,-.1',..-- ,/ A? -- ),--, , .._,....-'• . . ,.--- , .. _.• ,,... r . . .•,24,r,,,ct.. .rt 1..-.1c.*t,-,..4.,Wzi 2:, „,,..-, .., -'''' •, „,.:z.--;:. - - ---------- - „.., _ -,. , ..„ * ,. ...vow , . . ..„ m n I ',4 j , : .- jW /- , • -1 1 Ii , _ .. . . . . . . �- . . . _ , I - .I ./ Ulmmrn Nr ID O C ID IL K u G H I H g • m M H, S Y N W K H a 'F't n1 0 Iy :c mNml� 0 L ,< 33 N H n a•, az m m ortar e nacos''n'Hoeee o ' 3 3 3 3 H •c pG'd . . m n N N 0,On In fn cn m H Iy 3333330 2'.. Co G1mr m G1 G1 m Cor r r -G Coo m m Co oN W 000100°/C 0 3 N N H r mug o, me 'c g m I.>.o rNn e e a,L,'", .x PPF"???, la 1.0 l0 la 10 lam e. 0 0 0 0 0 0 m G H. a,ztiv to2•0G1 ra 00030 IO v 0 3 co n nn ox C co Z S E S 0.CO XO XO 00 XI,m O W Nv co%X N rt N m Iv 2 H :' ,, r0-r/°m co o, .-x w w mI I I I O Co3 n 1In No N o a x x�x w o m I.B h a y Co Co co Co 7 a- Co'a a.CD O rt Co 0 h ID 21 N m n e m es ``...')' R rt n 01 T.. h N O E �a✓° k.n art 5 ('>';'. rt Co a Co.(Q T m 23 rD r, 0• O Co Co h r rt rt 5 a m m rroo'a a o ,, C rt23 0r 'a h h O h �w I`,. 23 o h n •-•n k o w I-..n '"w (D N I-.Co o O n %, a D a a m 7 ri 0,23 " LPO I.rtn. I C OO h c C (n n C a a l0 rt • DID H.C N H '0 h 0 0 0, N. m o N D N Co.I-C • a a Co a 0 01 m Co n, C D N C N N a l-. 0 W(D a Co 0 rt a Ib (n C CD 0 h 5 B (D rt h 0, Town Hall Station Drawn By: Kathy Frey Date Comments y Checked By: po m N Date:9/2/2016 9/2/2016 �- •. LumaSa!esAssocIates 4500 Va11yview Rd Lighting.nn controls NJ Sales Rep: Steve Hahn e. Ei Edina, MN PAGE 1 OF 2 N Scale: AS SHOWN CITY OF EDINA MEMO Engineering Department 4,9/---"Sj1 Phone 952-826-0371 •Fax 952-826-0392•www.EdinaMN.gov YR yt:itNAV Date: September 14, 2016 To: Planning Commission cc: From: Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, CFM, Water Resources Coordinator Subject: Floodplain Districts Overlay ordinance updates Introduction FEMA administers the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) which aims to reduce the impact of flooding on private and public structures by providing affordable insurance and requiring participating communities to adopt and enforce ordinances that meet or exceed FEMA requirements to reduce the risk of flooding. The City joined the NFIP in 1980. Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) and a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) are produced county by county in support of the NFIP. These products identify and delineate flood hazard areas and have implications for flood insurance and land development. The current effective FEMA FIRM and FIS were adopted by the City in 2004. FEMA has updated the Hennepin County maps. On May 4, 2016 FEMA issued a Letter of Final Determination, available on the City's flood resources website (http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=engineering_flood_resources) indicating that the updated maps would become effective on November 4, 2016. The effective FIRM will be used by Federally insured or regulated lenders to determine if flood insurance is required as a condition of the loan. A detailed background memo dated July 25, 2016 and titled "Updates to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Insurance Study for Hennepin County," describing the map changes, the appeals brought forth by the City, and a description to access updated data is attached. The city must adopt a conforming ordinance by the effective date in order to continue participating in the NFIP. By law, FEMA cannot offer flood insurance in communities that do not have regulations that meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the NFIP (these regulations can be found in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR) Section 60.3). The MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is the state floodplain regulatory agency and has provided a model ordinance for the City to modify and adopt. The model ordinance has changed significantly since the last time this process was undertaken. Some of the updates to the model ordinance were required by FEMA, some were clarifications or corrections to ensure state and federal laws are being followed, and some were optional recommended language for the City to consider. City staff have drafted a community-specific ordinance based on the model and received a conditional letter of approval from the MN DNR. A copy of the annotated DNR model ordinance, the red-line version with comments from City staff and DNR, and the proposed ordinance are attached. City of Edina • 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina,MN 55439 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Page 2 If the City fails to adopt appropriate floodplain management regulations before the k November 4, 2016 effective date, the community will be suspended from the NFIP o and the following sanctions will apply; .E.�y • Property owners will not be able to purchase NFIP flood insurance policies •`°p$;,s., and existing policies will not be renewed. • Federal grants or loans for development will not be available in identified flood hazard areas under programs administered by Federal agencies such as the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Small Business Administration. • Federal disaster assistance will not be provided to repair insurable buildings located in identified flood hazard areas for damage caused by a flood. • Federal mortgage insurance or loan guarantees will not be provided in identified flood hazard areas such as those written by the Federal Housing Administration and the Department of Veteran Affairs. • Federally insured or regulated lending institutions, such as banks and credit unions, are allowed to make conventional loans for insurable buildings in flood hazard areas of non-participating communities. However, the lender must notify applicants that the property is in a flood hazard area and that the property is not eligible for Federal disaster assistance. Some lenders may voluntarily choose not to make these loans. Summary of proposed changes to the Floodplain Districts ordinance Major proposed changes are summarized below with supporting details describing which agencies (federal, state, or city) are driving the change. I. Adoption of the updated FIRM and FIS by reference. o Federal requirement; updated FIRM panels and FIS have been finalized. 2. Many definitions were added including basement, critical facilities, development, FIRM flood insurance rate map,flood prone area, new construction, 100-year floodplain, special flood hazard area, and start of construction. o Federal requirement; many definitions listed here are mandatory. o City opted in; definitions for `critical facilities', and `flood prone area' are optional. 3. The `lowest floor' definition is clarified. o Federal requirement; a definition for 'lowest floor' must be provided. A copy/paste error in the current version causes confusion. Federal definition provides for some exemptions. o City opted out of exemptions; City staff provided a revised definition for lowest floor but did not include the exemptions. See the red-line version of the proposed ordinance with comments from City staff and the DNR. 4. Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines, and pipelines used to be a conditional use, now these are permitted uses if the DNR is notified and certain standards are met. o State-level change. 5. In the standards for floodway conditional uses and flood fringe permitted uses, the size for accessory structures that may be internally/wet floodproofed increased from 500 square feet to 576 square feet. o State-level change. o City opted in; allowing for wet floodproofing of a small accessory structure up to 576 square feet is optional. Wet flood proofing to 500 square feet is allowed in the current ordinance. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Page 3 ■ Opting in to this provision is less protective; however, cvv./ ..4 provides more flexibilityfor development and 64 rH D Q �, redevelopment. r �• y \� 6. Placement of manufactured homes, recreational vehicle parks, and .�-"T� campgrounds are prohibited in any floodplain district. o State requirement; this is a revision to recognize the Minnesota Department of Health's rules (section 4630.0200) which prohibits mobile home parks and recreational camping areas in flood-prone areas. 7. The regulatory flood protection elevation has been increased to two-feet (previously was one-foot) above the BFE. o State requirement; the one-foot elevation is mandated by State law. o City opted in; City staff proposes raising the RFPE to two-feet above the BFE. ® The proposed two-foot elevation provision conforms to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) floodplain development rule as well as the City's engineering standards. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District floodplain development rule requires that low door and window openings be no less than two-feet above the BFE. • This provides increased protection for the health, safety, and welfare of the community. FEMA models are based flood risk assumptions that are now superseded in City and NMCWD modeling, so an additional I foot margin of safety is prudent. ■ Mitigation costs vary by type and location, but in general, mitigation saves society an average of$4 for every $I spent ("Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: An Independent Study to Assess the Future Savings from Mitigation Activities", National Institute of Building Sciences, 2005). 8. Some conditional uses in the floodway have been removed. o State requirement; the City must allow for some uses of the floodway, but may choose those that are appropriate for the community. o City opted out; some of the conditional uses were removed to allow only those that were appropriate for Edina. 9. The optional alternative elevation methods for flood fringe conditional uses (meaning an alternative to fill such as stilts or pilings) have been removed. o City opted out; federal law allows for alternative elevation methods such as stilts or pilings however, these are rare in Minnesota. • According to the DNR's annotated model ordinance, these alternative methods are, "burdensome to administer—typically requiring non-conversion agreements and detailed monitoring and inspections." 10. The standards for flood fringe permitted uses requiring that all new principal structures must have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation has been removed. o City opted out; this provision is in the current ordinance. It is an optional provision and City staff proposes to remove it. • Opting out of this provision is less protective; however, provides more flexibility for development and redevelopment. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Page 4 I I. Division 8, Nonconforming Uses item (3) requiring the cost of any structural alterations or additions to any nonconforming structure over o the life of the structure not exceed 50%of the market value of the yrt structure are proposed to be removed. �� o Federal requirement; substantial improvement must be tracked •'`r ;; ,;A,° over a one-year period at a minimum. o State requirement; buildings and structures within the Floodway District may not be enlarged or expanded; i.e. the envelope of the structure cannot change. In the Flood Fringe, structures may be enlarged or expanded as long as the addition meets the elevation standards and does not constitute a substantial improvement. o State suggested; language is included in the state model ordinance as a tool to gradually eliminate non-conformities over time. This would include any structural alterations and additions constructed since the City first joined the NFIP in 1980. If the cost of all previous and proposed alterations and additions exceed 50% of the current market value of the structure, then the structure would be required to come into compliance with the standards for new structures depending on whether the structure is in the floodway or flood fringe district. o City opted out;tracking cumulative improvements over the life of the structure is in the current ordinance, however, City staff proposes that it be replaced with the federal minimum. • Opting out of this provision is less protective; however, provides more flexibility for development and redevelopment. 12. Division 8, Nonconforming Uses item (4) requiring that if any non-conforming use is discontinued for 12 consecutive months, any future use of the building premises shall conform to floodplain districts ordinance articles has been removed. It is an optional provision that is not carried forward in the proposed update. o State suggested; language is included in the state model ordinance as a tool to gradually eliminate non-conformities over time. o City opted out;the provision is included in the current ordinance, however, City staff proposes that it be removed. ■ Opting out of this provision is less protective; however, provides more flexibility for development and redevelopment. 13. 'Repetitive Loss' is a relatively new, optional federal provision in the model ordinance (model reference 2.936 and 11.16). o Federal requirement;if any nonconformity is substantially damaged (sustaining damage from any natural disaster which equals or exceeds 50%of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred) it may not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of the floodplain district ordinance. o State suggested; 'Repetitive Loss' language is included in the state model ordinance as a tool to gradually eliminate non-conformities over time. It is intended to gradually eliminate nonconformities that are frequently damaged but not to the 50%level. If included, it would require structures that have been damaged more than once to be reconstructed in conformance with the provisions of this ordinance, even if the repairs amounted to less than 50% of the market value of the structure. o City opted out;the provision is optional and was not included in the proposed ordinance update. ■ Opting out of this provision is less protective. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Page 5 14. Division 7, Land Development Standards section 7.1, 7.25, and 7.3 have kbeen added in the proposed ordinance update. p yt'.4 o State suggested;these provisions enable communities to mana e N mflood risks in unmapped but flood-prone areas. g . o City opted in; this section would apply to flood-prone areas including those identified in the local Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. ■ This provides increased protection for the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Resident outreach After November 4, the updated map effective date, lending agencies will review their loans and the updated FIRM to see which ones have principle structures in the SFHA. Those with mortgages from a federally regulated or insured lender are required by Federal law to carry flood insurance. Most lenders will then send a letter indicating that property owners in the SFHA must get flood insurance within 45 days or have a policy force-placed, which is normally much more expensive. Normal home hazard insurance does not cover flood damage. Neither FEMA nor the DNR conduct outreach to inform residents of the map updates. City staff has prepared letters for affected residents with information describing how the update affects them,where to find more information, and what to do if they believe they've been inadvertently included in the SFHA. Several versions were drafted with information geared specifically to the various situations that affected property owners may find themselves in. Copies of the letters are available at http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=engineering_flood_resources If property owners believe they are actually elevated above the BFE they may submit a Letter of Map Amendment with sufficient elevation data to FEMA to be removed from the SFHA and thus, the federal requirement to carry flood insurance for certain mortgage holders. Property owners can either provide a survey, or in certain circumstances where structures are clearly elevated above the BFE, they may qualify for a streamlined LOMA process where the City can provide a map showing that the structure is Out As Shown (OAS) in lieu of a survey. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping software was used to overlay digital floodplain data with local parcel information to create a mailing list of affected residents. As the list was being compiled, it was clear that some parcels intersected with the 2-D updated floodplain layer shape; however, were actually elevated far above the BFE. Flood insurance premiums can cost property owners hundreds to thousands of dollars each year. Additionally, the cost to furnish a certified survey can cost about$1,000. Considering this, staff decided to review each affected parcel to see if the property owners would be eligible for a streamlined LOMA process. In cases where it was appropriate, an OAS map was furnished up-front and provided to the property owner.This minimizes the burden of flood insurance for private property owners that are actually at lower risk and eliminates the need to commission a Professional Land Surveyor to furnish a field survey. The GIS query revealed nearly 700 affected parcels which break down into the following categories; • 224 parcels with principle structures intersect with the SFHA. A desktop review of these parcels showed that it was too close to determine if the structure was above or below the BFE without a field survey. If the property owner believes the lowest floor (including a basement) is above the BFE, they may submit a LOMA with a field survey. • 2 Letter of Map Changes (LOMCs) will be superseded. These properties had a LOMA; however, when the updated maps become effective, the determinations will be superseded because updated City of Edina 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Page 6 hydraulic and hydrologic data revealed that the lowest floor elevations of 4,91r� the principle structures are actually below the BFE. o t )1'4 o 42 LOMCs will be revalidated. These properties had provided elevation s O data showing they were above the BFE and were removed from the SFHA. The LOMCs will be automatically revalidated by FEMA one day after the "Y•, »� updated maps become effective, free of charge. ® 40 parcels with principle structures are shown to be newly out of the SFHA in a lower risk zone. City Staff prepared and provided OAS maps to these property owners so that they may communicate their lower flood risk to their lenders. ® 379 parcels with principle structures intersect with the SFHA, but are clearly elevated above the BFE. City staff prepared OAS maps for each, potentially saving homeowners from paying hundreds to thousands annually in flood insurance premiums, and perhaps for years without knowing. The maps also may be used for a LOMA in lieu of a survey, providing further potential cost savings. Another service that is provided for residents is the interactive water resources map (https://www.barr.com/maps/edina/index.html#/-93.3600/44.8918/13). A link to the map was provided in each letter so that residents may use the tool to view an aerial photograph of their property overlaid with the updated SFHA. It is a helpful tool in effectively and efficiently communicating flood risk to stakeholders. At the time this memo was prepared, neither FEMA nor Hennepin County had launched an interactive map with the updated floodplain data. Because Edina's water resources map had been updated, staff didn't have to wait to send letters which provided more lead time for eligible property owners to sign up for insurance policies. Schedule 05/04— FEMA issues Letter of Final Determination and marks beginning of 6-month adoption period. 07/11 — DNR provides floodplain ordinance model. 07/28—City staff review/discuss ordinance updates. Proposed changes must be submitted to the DNR for approval. 08/09— DNR provides conditional approval to Edina for proposed ordinance updates. 08/31 —09/09—Send letters to residents about 8 weeks before effective date. Preferred Risk Policies (PRP) may be available to new policy holders, but must be purchased more than 30 days before updated maps become effective. 09/14— Proposed ordinance update on Planning Commission agenda for discussion. 09/15—Ad run date for Planning Commission public hearing. 09/28— Proposed ordinance update and public hearing on agenda for Planning Commission. 10/04— 30 days until maps become effective— new PRP insurance policies should be purchased by this date to be effective before updated maps become effective. 10/05—City Council resolution for public hearing on 10/18. 10/06—Ad run date for City Council public hearing. 10/18— Proposed ordinance update and public hearing on agenda. Request for City Council to grant 1st reading and waive 2nd reading, adopting proposed ordinance. 10/26—Ad run date for notice of adopted ordinance published. 10/27—Adopted ordinance is officially filed with County Recorder. 11/01 —Signed and certified in-effect ordinance, affidavits of publication, and completed "ordinance certification checklist" due to DNR. 11/04— New maps become effective, must be adopted by community prior to this date to continue participation in the National Flood Insurance Program. --- City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO NA Engineering Department 4r9��1 tr Phone 952-826-0371 •Fax 952-826-0392•www.EdinaMN.gov � �f Date: July 25, 2016 To: File cc: From: Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, CFM, Water Resources Coordinator Subject: 2016 updates to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Insurance Study for Hennepin County FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program FEMA administers the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) which aims to reduce the impact of flooding on private and public structures by providing affordable insurance and requiring participating communities to adopt and enforce ordinances that meet or exceed FEMA requirements to reduce the risk of flooding. The City joined the NFIP in 1980. Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) and a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) are produced for the county in support of the NFIP. These products delineate flood hazard areas and have implications for flood insurance and land development. The current effective FEMA FIRM and FIS were adopted by the City in 2004. The 2016 updates to the FIRM and FIS incorporate modeling results from hydrologic and hydraulic models developed in the mid-2000s. FEMA has spent approximately the past ten years finalizing the Hennepin County maps. A major change with the map update was modernization to a digital format designed for use with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. This allows for better integration of local datasets with flood hazard data to assist with floodplain management. During the map revision process several appeals and map review comments, which are summarized below, were submitted to FEMA by Barr Engineering on behalf of the City of Edina. The updated FIS and FIRM are available for download at https://msc.fema.gov/portal/advanceSearch . A paper copy is available in the Engineering Department. A comparison of the 2016 updated FIRM and the current effective FIRM from 2004 can be seen in the Changes Since Last FIRM (CSLF) maps available on the City's website at http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=engineering_flood_resources Comments and Appeals to the Map Revision A 90-day review period was issued for preliminary revised maps in spring of 2013. City staff shared the preliminary maps via letters to more than 800 property owners affected by the proposed changes. Based on resident feedback, three main areas of concern were identified (Nine Mile Village, Morningside, and Rolling Green). In early June 2013, City Council authorized the Engineering Department to consult with Barr Engineering to study the proposed changes. In instances where the preliminary flood hazard determinations were shown to be scientifically or technically incorrect, an appeal was warranted. Residents City of Edina • 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, MN 55439 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Page 2 were invited to a public meeting to hear about Barr's findings and ask questions. In /, ,9 rj July 2013, appeals were submitted to FEMA. (o e m Nine Mile Village N� tn,y0 The preliminary maps included a large area near Bredesen Park that had not n; ��t`• previously been in the floodplain. Barr determined that this was due to incorrectly placed flood elevations and imprecise topographical data in the ditch along Highway 62. Survey data showed that backwater from Nine Mile Creek would not flow into Nine Mile Village in the modeled 100-year flood event, as the preliminary model had suggested. The appeal was successful and resulted in removal of the large area which prevented FEMA from erroneously placing many parcels within the floodplain. Morningside The preliminary maps showed a designated FEMA A zone (approximate 100-year floodplain where specific flood elevations are not shown on the FEMA maps) overlay in the Morningside neighborhood based on data from 1978. Barr used more accurate hydrologic and hydraulic models to show that the preliminary data was insufficient and out-of-date. FEMA indicated that the request did not qualify as an appeal because it was not a newly mapped area; it had been carried forward from previous maps going back as far as 1982. Instead, a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) was submitted to incorporate the data into the new maps. Rolling Green The preliminary map reflected flood elevations that were too high due to a modeling error. The appeal pointed out mathematical errors as a result of using an older version of the modeling software. Using a newer software version meant better quality data and lower flood elevations in some areas. Since the Minnehaha Creek model required updates along the entire corridor, from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River, the City of Edina submitted an appeal, but maintained that FEMA and the MN DNR be responsible for revising the model and remapping the floodplain. The appeal was successful and resulted in an improved model for Minnehaha Creek with much lower overall error. Summary of Map Actions (SOMAs)for Letter of Map Changes (LOMCs) There are instances where parcels intersect with the flood hazard area on the 2-D map, but the structure is clearly elevated above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE). In these instances, property owners can submit a letter of map change (LOMC) with proper elevation data attached. With the 2016 maps, there were 42 properties that had previously submitted a LOMC and are still above the updated BFE. FEMA will automatically revalidate these LOMCs, free of charge. There were 2 instances where the LOMCs were superseded and will no longer be in effect when the revised FIRM becomes effective due to revised hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, or the structures being below the updated BFE. Other Flood Risk Considerations The Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) with support from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is working on a flood improvement project at Meadowbrook Golf Course which may have an impact on flood risk in the Rolling Green neighborhood. The City of Edina is a stakeholder and MPRB is leading the project. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Page 3 The Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (CWRMP) provides 4g1rzA,A,1�, guidance on flood protection and water quality improvement projects in the City. p yt Where the FEMA FIRM provides flood hazard information on a regional scale, thep cn CWRMP is a tool for managing local flood risk. The CWRMP is due for an update �v :79•�$, in 2017 (tentative completion date) and will include an extensive update to the • � hydrologic and hydraulic modeling with updated infrastructure, topography, and precipitation data. In 2013, NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS) published new precipitation frequency estimates ("Atlas 14")for the state of Minnesota and other Midwestern states. The Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates, which are the estimated rainfall depths for various rainfall durations and exceedance probabilities, replace the precipitation estimates published in Technical Paper No. 40 Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States ("TP 40"). The Atlas 14 rainfall frequency estimates indicate a significant increase in the depth of the 50-year and 100-year frequency rainfall events (i.e., rainfall events with exceedance probabilities of 2%and 1%, respectively) across Minnesota and neighboring states, as compared with the TP 40 estimates used previously. For the Minneapolis/St. Paul area, the increases in 24-hour duration precipitation depths over TP 40 are as high 25%. The CWRMP will incorporate the Atlas 14 data. The FEMA maps are based on models which used TP 40 precipitation data. Additionally, the FEMA maps did not incorporate state topographical (LiDAR) data which became available in 2011 because the flood modeling for Hennepin County was completed prior to 2011. Ordinance Revision The city must adopt a conforming ordinance by November 4, 2016 in order to continue participating in the NFIP. The MN Department of Natural Resources (DNR) is the state floodplain regulatory agency and has provided a model ordinance for the City to modify and adopt. The model ordinance has changed significantly since the last time this process was undertaken. Some of the updates to the model ordinance are required by FEMA, some are clarifications or corrections to ensure state and federal laws are being followed, and some are optional recommended language for the City to consider. City staff is drafting a community-specific ordinance based on the model which will be submitted to the DNR for review in early August. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Minnesota Sample Floodplain Ordinance Three District Ordinance This sample ordinance includes the three primary types offloodplain districts:Floodway,Flood Fringe,and MNDNR General Floodplain.It can be used in a variety of situations,where all three districts or only some of them are present. Contents SECTION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION,FINDINGS OF FACT AND PURPOSE 2 SECTION 2.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 SECTION 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS 6 SECTION 4.0 FLOODWAY DISTRICT(FW) 6 SECTION 5.0 FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT(FF) 8 SECTION 6.0 GENERAL FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT(GF) 1139 SECTION 7.0 LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11 SECTION 8.0 PUBLIC UTILITIES,RAILROADS,ROADS,AND BRIDGES 12 SECTION 9.0 MANUFACTURED HOMES,MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS,AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. 1331 SECTION 10.0 ADMINISTRATION 13 SECTION 11.0 NONCONFORMITIES 16 SECTION 12.0 PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT 17 SECTION 13.0 AMENDMENTS 1847 27053C0452F 2.4 Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation: The regulatory flood protection elevation(RFPE)is an elevation no lower than ltwo feet lone foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by - Comment[Jess2]:Change from one foot to encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. two feet to conform to WD rules and Engineering Standards. 2.5 Interpretation: The boundaries of the zoning districts are determined by scaling distances on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. 2.51 Where a conflict exists between the floodplain limits illustrated on the official zoning map and actual field conditions,the flood elevations shall be the governing factor.The Zoning Administrator must interpret the boundary location based on the ground elevations that existed on the site on the date of the first National Flood Insurance Program map showing the area within the regulatory floodplain,and other available technical data. 2.52 Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries will be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the(Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment)and to submit technical evidence. 2.6 Abrogation and Greater Restrictions: It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal,abrogate,or impair any existing easements,covenants,or other private agreements.However,where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions,the provisions of this ordinance prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. 2.7 Warning and Disclaimer of Liability: This ordinance does not imply that areas outside the floodplain districts or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages.This ordinance does not create liability on the part of the City of Edina or its officers or employees for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. 2.8 Severability: If any section,clause,provision,or portion of this ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of law,the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected and shall remain in full force. 2.9 Definitions: Unless specifically defined below,words or phrases used in this ordinance must be interpreted according to common usage and so as to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. 2,911 Accessory Use or Structure—a use or structure on the same lot with,and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to,the principal use or structure. 2.912 Base Flood Elevation—The elevation of the"regional flood."The term"base flood elevation"is used in the flood insurance survey. 2.913 Basement—any area of a structure,including crawl spaces,having its floor or base subgrade(below ground level)on all four sides,regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. 12.914 Conditional Use a specific type of structure or land use listed in the official control that may be allowed but only after on in depth review procedure and with appropriate conditions or restrictions as provided in the official zoning controls or building codes and upon a finding that: (a)Certain conditions as detailed in the zoning-ordinance exist. (b)The structure and/or land use conform to the comprehensive land use plan if one exist..,and arc compatible with the existing neighborhood.' _ - Comment[CoE3]:Conditional use defined 2.915 Critical Facilities—facilities necessary to a community's public health and safety,those that store or in 36-10. produce highly volatile,toxic or water-reactive materials,and those that house occupants that may be insufficiently mobile to avoid loss of life or injury. Examples of critical facilities include hospitals, correctional facilities,schools,daycare facilities,nursing homes,fire and police stations,wastewater treatment facilities,public electric utilities,water plants,fuel storage facilities,and waste handling and storage facilities. 2.916 Development—any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate,including buildings or other structures,mining,dredging,filling,grading,paving,excavation or drilling operations,or storage of equipment or materials. 2.917 Equal Degree of Encroachment—a method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that floodplain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows. 2.918 Farm Fence A fence as defined by Minn.Statutes Section 344.02,Subd.1(a)(d).An open type fence of posts and wire is not considered to be a structure under this ordinance.Fences that have the potential-to ordinance. 2.919 Flood—a temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. 2.920 Flood Frequency—the frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded. 2.921 Flood Fringe—the portion of the Special Flood Hazard Area(one percent annual chance flood)located outside of the floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term"floodway fringe"used in the Flood i Comment[MB4]:Sorry,this definition Insurance Study for Hennepin County,Minnesota. �" should have been included in the model originally sent.Mandatory definition. 12.922 Flood Insurance Rate Map-an official map on which the Federal Insurance Administrator has delineated �/ both the special hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community.A FIRM that has Comment[CoES]:Question for DNR— been made available digitally is called a Digital Flood Insurance Rate Mao(DFIRM)j / "Could we r he'storage'exclusion? I We've had owbelow nersners want to build a sport court 2.923 Flood Prone Area—any land susceptible to being inundated by water from any source(see"Flood"). below their basement and call it a storage space." 2.924 Floodplain—the beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland,lake or watercourse which have been or Comment[MBE]: hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. /I' 2.927 Lowest Floor—the lowest floor of the 2.925 Floodproofing—a combination of structural provisions,changes,or adjustments to properties and I lowest enclosed area(including basement). structures subject to flooding,primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. enclosure,used solely for parking of vehicles, 2.926 Floodway—the bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the I i building access,or storage is an area other adjoining floodplain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. than a basement area,is not considered a Ii - 12.927 Lowest Floor—the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area(including basement). An unfinished or flood I/ enclosure is not built so as to reader the resistant enclosure,used solely for parking of vehicles,building access,or storage in an area other than a li . - on basement area,is not considered a building's lowest floor;provided,that such enclosure is not built so as it e federal Rc u ign req C .3s of M14 code of g Regulations,Part L0.3 to render the structure in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirements of 44 Code of Federal Regulations,Part 60.31 Since the city is not allowing the alternative elevation methods(5.34&5.46 of the sample 2.928!Manufactured Home l--a structure,transportable in one or more sections,which is built on a permanent ordinance),that sentence is not applicable chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached to the required I\ and will just confuse folks. utilities. The term"manufactured home"does not include the term"recreational vehicle." The questions about using the space as a 2.929 New Construction-Structures,including additions and improvements,and placement of manufactured I sports court in addition to storage and parking homes,for which the start of construction commenced on or after the effective date of this ordinance. is also not applicable.That part of the lowest floor definition was to explain that only those 2.930 Obstruction—any dam,wall,wharf,embankment,levee,dike,pile,abutment,projection,excavation, limited uses were allowed if the space was channel modification,culvert,building,wire,fence,stockpile,refuse,fill,structure,or matter in,along, being wet floodproofed in accordance with across,or projecting into any channel,watercourse,or regulatory floodplain which may impede,retard,or % the 5.46 standards. A basement with storage change the direction of the flow of water,either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such ora sports court would still be required to be elevated to the RFPE. water. 2.931 One Hundred Year Floodplain—lands inundated by the"Regional Flood"(see definition). Comment[CoE7]:This is a mandatory definition.-JVW • c ° Comment Je s8[ s ]:Principal use defined in 36-10. 2.932 Reach—a hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction.In an urban area,the segment ofa stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach. 2.9331Recreational VehicleFa vehicle that is built on a single chassis,is 400 square feet or less when measured at Comment[CoE9]:This is a mandatory the largest horizontal projection,is designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty definition.-JVW truck,and is designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational,camping,travel,or seasonal use.For the purposes of this ordinance,the term recreational vehicle is synonymous with the term"travel trailer/travel vehicle." 2.934 Regional Flood—a flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 1%chance or 100-year recurrence interval.Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood"used in a flood insurance study. 2.935 Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation(RFPE)-an elevation not less than'two feet one foot labove the - Comment[Jess10]:Change from one foot elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the to two feet to conform to WD rules and floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. Engineering Standards. 2.937 Special Flood Hazard Area—a term used for flood insurance purposes synonymous with"One Hundred Year Floodplain." 2.938 Start of Construction—includes substantial improvement,and means the actual start of construction, repair,reconstruction,rehabilitation,addition,placement or other improvement that occurred before The permit's expiration date.The actual start is either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site,such as the pouring of slab or footings,the installation of piles,the construction of columns,or any work beyond the stage of excavation;or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation.Permanent construction does not include land preparation,such as clearing,grading and filling;nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways;nor does it include excavation for a basement,footings,piers,foundations,or the erection of temporary forms;nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings,such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure.For a substantial improvement,the actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall,ceiling,floor,or other structural part of a building,whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building. 2.939 Structure-anything constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the ground or on-site utilities, including,but not limited to,buildings,factories,sheds,detached garages,cabins,manufactured homes, recreational vehicles not meeting the exemption criteria specified in Section 9.22 of this ordinance and other similar items. 2.940 Substantial Damage-means damage of any origin sustained by a structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. 2.941 Substantial Improvement-within any consecutive 365-day period,any reconstruction,rehabilitation kincluding normal maintenance and repair)G repair after damage,addition,or other improvement of a --- Comment[CoE11]:This is a mandatory structure,the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the definition. "start of construction"of the improvement.This term includes structures that have incurred"substantial damage,"regardless of the actual repair work performed.The term does not,however,include either: (a)Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary,or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions. (b)Any alteration of a"historic structure,"provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a"historic structure." For the purpose of this ordinance,"historic structure"is as defined in 44 Code of Federal Regulations,Part 59.1. 2.10 Annexations: The Flood Insurance Rate Map panels adopted by reference into Section 2.3 above may include floodplain areas that lie outside of the corporate boundaries of the City of Edina at the time of adoption of this ordinance. If any of these floodplain land areas arc annexed into the City of Edina after the date of adoption of this ordinance,the newly annexed floodplain lands will be subject to the provisions of this ordinance immediately upon the date of annexation. 2.11 Detachments. The Flood Insurance Rate Map panels adopted by reference into Section 2.3 above will include floodplain areas that lie inside the corporate boundaries of municipalities at the time of adoption of this ordinance. If any of these floodplain land or as arc detached from a municipality and come under the jurisdiction of the City of Edina after the date of adoption of this ordinance,the newly detached floodplain lands will be subject to the provisions of this ordinance immediately upon the date of detachment. SECTION 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS 3.1 Districts: I Comment[MB12]:I added a couple of 3.11 Floodway District. The Floodway District includes those areas within Zones AE that have a floodway small changes to 3.1 for clarity. delineated as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 2.3.For lakes,wetlands and other basins within Zones A and AE that do not have a floodway delineated,the Floodway District also includes those areas that are at or below the ordinary high water level as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005,subdivision 14. 3.12 Flood Fringe District. The Flood Fringe District includes areas within Zones AE that have a floodway delineated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 2.3,but are located outside of the floodway.For lakes,wetlands and other basins within Zones A and AE that do not have a floodway delineated,the Flood Fringe District also includes those areas below the 1%annual chance(100-year)flood elevation but above the ordinary high water level as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 1036.005, subdivision 14. 3.13 General Floodplain District. The General Floodplain District includes those riverine areas within Zone A that do not have a delineated floodway as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 2.3. 3.2 Applicability: Within the floodplain districts established in this ordinance,the use,size,type and location of development must comply with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. In no cases shall floodplain development adversely affect the efficiency or unduly restrict the capacity of the channels or floodways of any tributaries to the main stream,drainage ditches,or any other drainage facilities or systems.All uses not listed as permitted uses or conditional uses in Sections 4.0,5.0 and 6.0 are prohibited.In addition,critical facilities,as defined in Section 2.915,are prohibited in all floodplain districts. SECTION 4.0 FLOODWAY DISTRICT(FW) 4.1 Permitted Uses: The following uses,subject to the standards set forth in Section 4.2,are permitted uses if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay district: 4.11 General farming,pasture,grazing,outdoor plant nurseries,horticulture,truck farming,forestry,sod. farming,and wild crop harvesting. 4.12 Industrial-commercial loading areas,parking areas,and airport landing strips. 4.13 Open space uses,including but not limited to private and public golf courses,tennis courts,driving ranges, archery ranges,picnic grounds,boat launching ramps,swimming areas,parks,wildlife and nature preserves,game farms,fish hatcheries,shooting preserves,hunting and fishing areas,and single or multiple purpose recreational trails. 4.14 Residential lawns,gardens,parking areas,and play areas. • I 4.15 Railroads,streets,bridges,utility transmission lines and pipelines,provided that the Department of Natural Resources'Area Hydrologist is notified at least ten days prior to issuance of any permit. 4.2 Standards for Floodway Permitted Uses: 4.21 The use must have a low flood damage potential. 4.22 the use must not obstruct flood flows or cause any increase in flood elevations and must not involve structures,obstructions,or storage of materials or equipment. 4.23 Any facility that will be used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth(in feet)multiplied by the velocity(in feet per second)would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional(1%chance)flood. 4.3 Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses following the standards and procedures set forth in Section 10.4 of this ordinance and further subject to the standards set forth in Section 4.4,if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay district. 4.31 Structures accessory to the uses listed in 4.11—4.13 above and the uses listed in 4.32-4.33 below. 4.32 Extraction and storage of sand,gravel,and other materials. 4.33 Marinas,boat rentals,docks,piers,wharves,and water control structures. 4.34 Storage yards for equipment,machinery,or materials. 4.35 Placement of fill: e- :- : -• - - •- - :- •--: 2.018,arc permitted uses. frequency flood event. 4.4 Standards for Floodway Conditional Uses: 4.41 All Uses. A conditional use must not cause any increase in the stage of the 1%chance or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. 4.42 Fill;Storage of Materials and Equipment: (a) The storage or processing of materials that are,in time of flooding,flammable,explosive,or potentially injurious to human,animal,or plant life is prohibited. (b)Fill,dredge spoil,and other similar materials deposited or stored in the floodplain must be protected from erosion by vegetative cover,mulching,riprap or other acceptable method.Permanent sand and gravel operations and similar uses must be covered by a long-term site development plan. (c) Temporarygmay equipment (Co �increase to the stage Tem orar placement of fill,other materials,or e w ment which would cause an incre of the 1%percent chance or regional flood onlybe allowed if the a^rrin Body)council has approved a plan that assures removal of the materials from the floodway based upon the flood warning time available. 4.43 Accessory Structures.Accessory structures,as identified in Section 4.31,may be permitted,provided that: (a)structures are not intended for human habitation; (b)structures will have a low flood damage potential; (c)structures will be constructed and placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; (d)Service utilities,such as electrical and heating equipment,within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; (e) Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code.All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation,collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. (f) As an alternative,an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code,provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment and does not exceed 576 square feet in size.Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: (1)To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure,there must be a minimum of two"automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure,with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding;and (2)There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. 4.44 Structural works for flood control that will change the course,current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,Section 1036.245. 4.45 A levee,dike orfloodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an increase to the 1%chance or regional flood.The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. 4.46 Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. SECTION 5.0 FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT(FF) 5.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are those uses of land or structures allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) that comply with the standards in Sections 5.2.If no pre existing,underlying zoning districts exist,then any residential or nonresidential structure or use of a structure or land is a permitted use provided it does not constitute a public nuisance. 5.2 Standards for Flood Fringe Permitted Uses: 5.21 All structures,including accessory structures,must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor,as defined,is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation.The!finished fig elevation for structures must be no Comment[CoE13]: lower than one foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation and the fill must extend at the same Question for DNR—"Is this last sentence elevation at least 15 feet beyond the outside limits of the structure. mandatory?Generally we promote grading away from structures at a 10:1.slope for 10 5.22 Accessory Structures.As an alternative to the fill requirements of section 5.21,structures accessory to the feet" uses identified in Section 5.1 may be permitted to be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 Comment[MB14]:Yes,it is mandatory per floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code,provided that: MN Rule 6120.5800.Subp.41B1.Please revise (a)the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment,does not exceed 576 square feet in size,and accordingly. is only used for parking and storage. (b)All portions of floodproofed accessory structures below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation must be:(i)adequately anchored to prevent flotation,collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls,(ii)be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage, and(iii)must have all service utilities be water-tight or elevated to above the regulatory flood protection elevation (c)Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: (1)To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure,there must be a minimum of two"automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure,with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding;and (2)There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure.Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. allowed as a conditional use under Section 5.33 below. - Comment[Jess15]:Already captured in 5.24 The storage of any materials or equipment must be elevated on fill to the regulatory flood protection grading permit. elevation. 5.25 All service utilities,including ductwork,must be elevated or water-tight to prevent infiltration of floodwaters. 5.26 The storage or processing of materials that are,in time of flooding,flammable,explosive,or potentially injurious to human,animal,or plant life is prohibited. 5.27 All fill must be properly compacted and the slopes must be properly protected by the use of riprap, vegetative cover or other acceptable method. 5.28 •- acceptable to the(Governing Body). .. .... ._.-. 5.29 Accessory uses such as yards,railroad tracks,and parking lots may be at an elevation lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation.However,any facilities used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth(in feet)multiplied by the velocity(in feet per second)would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional(1%chance)flood. 5.30 Interference with normal manufacturing/industrial plant operations must be minimized,especially along streams having protracted flood durations.In considering permit applications,due consideration must be given to the needs of industries with operations that require a floodplain location. __ - -.- -- - ---- I E ] None of these existing '" Comment Co 16: 5.3 Conditional Uses: The following uses and activities may be allowed as conditional uses,if allowed in the in Edina. underlying zoning district(s)or any applicable overlay district,following the procedures in Section 10.4 of this Comment[MB17]:I would suggest leaving ordinance. this in.See my note for 9.22 5.31 Any structure that is not elevated on fill or floodproofed in accordance with Sections 5.21 and 5.22 of this ordinance. Comment[Jess18]:This is in the current ordinance.City team—are you ok with 5.32 Storage of any material or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation. / removing this? 5.33 The cumulative placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill when the fill is not being used to elevate a / The annotated model ordinance says,"5.34. structure in accordance with Section 5.21 of this ordinance. The DNR refers to these as"alternative , elevation 5.34 - - " " • _ - -- - -- - - " ` •°' -" ':• ° "= = = - -. = / alternative to fill.Thismeaning is designated optional '- _o'-: ,o :. . - c __- - : - -,-- a -_ - -- . - . -- - - - - -• / becausetheyareburdensometoadminister- - typically requiring nonconversion agreements — and detailed monitoring and inspections.See 5.46." 5.4 Standards for Flood Fringe Conditional Uses: 5.41 The standards listed in Sections 5.24 through 5.30 apply to all conditional uses. 5.42 Basements,as defined by Section 2.913 of this ordinance,are subject to the following: (a) Residential basement construction is not allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (b) Non-residential basements may be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation provided the basement is structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with Section 5.43 of this ordinance. 5.43 All areas of nonresidential structures,including basements,to be placed below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be floodproofed in accordance with the structurally dry floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code. Structurally dry floodproofing must meet the FPI or FP2 floodproofing classification in the State Building Code,which requires making the structure watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. 5.44 The placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill or other similar material on a parcel(other than for the purpose of elevating a structure to the regulatory flood protection elevation)must comply with an approved erosion/sedimentation control plan. (a)The plan must clearly specify methods to be used to stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum of the regional(1%chance)flood event. (b)The plan must be prepared and certified by a registered professional engineer or other qualified individual acceptable to the Council(Covcrning Body). (c)The plan may incorporate alternative procedures for removal of the material from the floodplain if adequate flood warning time exists. 5.45 Storage of materials and equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation must comply with an approved emergency plan providing for removal of such materials within the time available after a flood warning. 5.16 (OPTIONAL)Alternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor above the regulatory flood protection elevation.The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered above grade and not a structure's basement or lowest floor if:1)the enclosed arca is above grade on at least one side of the structure;2)it is designed to internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials;and 3)it is used solely for parking of vehicles,building access or storage.The above noted alternative elevation methods arc subject to the following additional standards: {a)Design and Certification The structure's design and as built condition must be certified by a registered profes..ional engineer as being in compliance with the general design standards of the State Building Code and,specifically,that all electrical,heating,ventilation,plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. {b)Specific Standards for Above grade,Enclosed Areas Above grade,fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages must be designed to internally flood and the design plans must stipulate: (1)The minimum arca of openings in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a floodproofing technique.There shall be a minimum of two openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade.The automatic openings shall have a minimum net or a of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed arca subject to flooding unless a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that a smaller net or a would suffice.The automatic openings may be equipped with screens,louvers,valves,or other any form of human intervention;and vehicles or storage. SECTION 6.0 GENERAL FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT(GF)! --" Comment[CoE19]:Do we have this zone? 6.1 Permitted Uses: Yes,we have zone A in the morningside area. 6.11 The uses listed in Section 4.1 of this ordinance,Floodway District Permitted Uses,are permitted uses. 6.12 All other uses are subject to the floodway/flood fringe evaluation criteria specified in Section 6.2 below. Section 4.0 applies if the proposed use is determined to be in the Floodway District.Section 5.0 applies if the proposed use is determined to be in the Flood Fringe District. 6.2 Procedures for Floodway and Flood Fringe Determinations: 6.21 Upon receipt of an application for a permit or other approval within the General Floodplain District,the Zoning Administrator must obtain,review and reasonably utilize any regional flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal,state,or other source. 6.22 If regional flood elevation and floodway data are not readily available,the applicant must furnish additional information,as needed,to determine the regulatory flood protection elevation and whether the proposed use would fall within the Floodway or Flood Fringe District.Information must be consistent with accepted hydrological and hydraulic engineering standards and the standards in 6.23 below. 6.23 The determination of floodway and flood fringe must include the following components,as applicable: (a) Estimate the peak discharge of the regional(1%chance)flood. (b) Calculate the water surface profile of the regional flood based upon a hydraulic analysis of the stream channel and overbank areas. (c) Compute the floodway necessary to convey or store the regional flood without increasing flood stages more than one-half(0.5)foot.A lesser stage increase than 0,5 foot is required if,as a result of the stage increase,increased flood damages would result.An equal degree of encroachment on both sides of the stream within the reach must be assumed in computing floodway boundaries. 6.24 The Zoning Administrator will review the submitted information and assess the technical evaluation and the recommended Floodway and/or Flood Fringe District boundary.The assessment must include the cumulative effects of previous floodway encroachments.The Zoning Administrator may seek technical assistance from a designated engineer or other expert person or agency,including the Department of Natural Resources. Based on this assessment,the Zoning Administrator may approve or deny the application. 6.25 Once the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries have been determined,the Zoning Administrator must process the permit application consistent with the applicable provisions of Section 4.0 and 5.0 of this ordinance. SECTION 7.0 LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.1 In General: Recognizing that flood prone areas may exist outside of the designated floodplain districts,the requirements of this section apply to all land within the City of Edina. 7.2 Subdivisions: No land may be subdivided which is unsuitable for reasons of flooding or inadequate drainage, water supply or sewage treatment facilities.!Manufactured home parks and rccr ational vehicle parks or campgrounds arc considered subdivi,ions under this ordinance.) _ -- Comment[CoE20]:None of these existing in Edina. 7.21 All lots within the floodplain districts must be able to contain a building site outside of the Floodway District at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. 7.22 All subdivisions must have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation,unless a flood warning emergency plan for the safe evacuation of all vehicles and people during the regional(1%chance)flood has been approved by the(Covcrnirg Body)council.The plan must be prepared by a registered engineer or other qualified individual,and must demonstrate that adequate time and personnel exist to carry out the evacuation. 7.23 For all subdivisions in the floodplain,the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries,the regulatory flood protection elevation and the required elevation of all access roads must be clearly labeled on all required subdivision drawings and platting documents. 7.24 In the General Floodplain District,applicants must provide the information required in Section 6.2 of this ordinance to determine the regional flood elevation,the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries and the regulatory flood protection elevation for the subdivision site. 7.25 If a subdivision proposal or other proposed new development is in a flood prone area,any such proposal must be reviewed to assure that: (a) All such proposals are consistent with the need to minimize flood damage within the flood prone area, (b) All public utilities and facilities,such as sewer,gas,electrical,and water systems are located and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage,and (c) Adequate drainage is provided to reduce exposure of flood hazard. 7.3 Building Sites. If a proposed building site is in a flood prone area,all new construction and substantial improvements(including the placement of manufactured homes)must be: (a) Designed(or modified)and adequately anchored to prevent floatation,collapse,or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads,including the effects of buoyancy; (b) Constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; (c) Constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage;gad (d) Constructed with electrical,heating,ventilation,plumbing,and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding,:and (e) Approved by the City Engineer. SECTION 8.0 PUBLIC UTILITIES,RAILROADS,ROADS,AND BRIDGES 8.1 Public Utilities: All public utilities and facilities such as gas,electrical,sewer,and water supply systems to be located in the floodplain must be floodproofed in accordance with the State Building Code,industry standards,or elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation. 8.2 Public Transportation Facilities: Railroad tracks,roads,and bridges to be located within the floodplain must comply with Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this ordinance.These transportation facilities must be elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation where failure or interruption of these facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area.Minor or auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. 8.3 On-site Water Supply and Sewage Treatment Systems: Where public utilities are not provided:1)On-site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725.4350,as amended;and 2)New or replacement on-site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters,they must not be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding,and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.2270,as amended. 'SECTION 9.0 MANUFACTURED HOMES,MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS,AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES.I - Comment[CoE21]:Section 9.1 is mandatory. 9.1 Manufactured Homes: New manufactured home parks and expansions to existing manufactured home parks are prohibited in any floodplain district. : - ' ' - . •• ----- -- - , ,, -- requirements apply: {a) New and replacement manufactured homes must be elevated in compliance with Section 5 of this ordinance and forces. requirements for subdivisions in Section 7.22. 9.2 Recreational Vehicles: New recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds and expansions to existing recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds are prohibited in any floodplain district.Placement of recreational vehicles in treated as new structures meeting the requirements of this ordinance. areas and meet the criteria listed in Section 9.22: {a) Individual lots or parcels of record. {b) Existing commercial recr ational vehicle parks or campgrounds. {c) Existing condominium type associations. 9.22 Criteria for Exempt Recreational Vehicles: i(a) The vehicle must have a current license required for highway use. Comment[MB221:This language should be {c) No permanent structural type addition.,maybe attached to the vehicle. reinserted into this section somehow.Itis required,and should be there to accommodate temporary storage of RV's a lot. {e) Accessory structures arc not permitted within the Floodway District.Any accessory structure in the flood Fringe applicable to manufactured homes in Section 9.22. (f) An accessory structure must constitute a minimal investment ecccuF SECTION 10.0 ADMINISTRATION 10.1 Zoning Administrator A Zoning Administrator or other official designated by the(Governing Body)must administer and enforce this ordinance. 10.2 Permit Requirements _ —_ Comment fjess23]:Kris to provide cross- 10.21 Permit Required. A permit must be obtained from the Zoning Administrator prior to conducting the references for 10.2.If they exist in other parts of the zoning ordinance they may be cross- following activities: referenced rather than repeated here.Must (a)The erection,addition,modification,rehabilitation,or alteration of any building,structure,or portion be able to demonstrate that these procedures or comparable ones are in place thereof. Normal maintenance and repair also requires a permit if such work,separately or in conjunction with other planned work,constitutes a substantial improvement as defined in this ordinance. (b)The use or change of use of a building,structure,or land. (c)The construction of a dam,fence,or on-site septic system,although a permit is not required for a farm fence as defined in this ordinance.. (d)The change or extension of a nonconforming use. (e)The repair of a structure that has been damaged by flood,fire,tornado,or any other source. (f) The placement of fill,excavation of materials,or the storage of materials or equipment within the floodplain. (g)Relocation or alteration of a watercourse(including new or replacement culverts and bridges),unless a public waters work permit has been applied for. (h)Any other type of"development"as defined in this ordinance. 10.22 Application for Permit. Permit applications must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided by the Zoning Administrator.The permit application must include the information required in Sec. 36-129 (a)A site plan showing all pertinent dimensions,existing or proposed buildings,structures,and significant natural f aturcs having an influence on the permit. {b)Location of fill or storage of materials in relation to the stream channel. (c)Copies of any required municipal,county,state or federal permits or approvals. (d)Other relevant information requested by the Zoning Administrator as necessary to properly evaluate the permit application. 10.23 Certificate of Zoning Compliance for a New,Altered,or Nonconforming Use. No building,land or structure may be occupied or used in any manner until a certificate of zoning compliance has been issued by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. 10.24 Certification. The applicant is required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect,or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. Floodproofing measures must be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. 10.25 Record of First Floor Elevation. The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest floor(including basement)of all new structures and alterations or additions to existing structures in the floodplain.The Zoning Administrator must also maintain a record of the elevation to which structures and alterations or additions to structures are floodproofed. 10.26 Notifications for Watercourse Alterations. Before authorizing any alteration or relocation of a river or stream,the Zoning Administrator must notify adjacent communities.If the applicant has applied for a permit to work in public waters pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Section 103G.245,this will suffice as adequate notice.A copy of the notification must also be submitted to the Chicago Regional Office of the - - Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). 10.27 Notification to FEMA When Physical Changes Increase or Decrease Base Flood Elevations. As soon as is practicable,but not later than six months after the date such supporting information becomes available, the Zoning Administrator must notify the Chicago Regional Office of FEMA of the changes by submitting a copy of the relevant technical or scientific data. 10.3 Variances: 10.31 Variance Applications. An application for a variance to the provisions of this ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with applicable state statutes and Sections{s) 36-95—36-104—of the zoning ordinance/code. 10.32 Adherence to State Floodplain Management Standards. A variance must not allow a use that is not allowed in that district,permit a lower degree of flood protection than the regulatory flood protection elevation for the particular area,or permit standards lower than those required by state law. 10.33 Additional Variance Criteria.The following additional variance criteria of the Federal Emergency Management Agency must be satisfied: (a) Variances must not be issued by a community within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. (b) Variances may only be issued by a community upon(i)a showing of good and sufficient cause,(ii)a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant, and(iii)a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety,extraordinary public expense,create nuisances,cause fraud on or victimization of the public,or conflict with existing focal laws or ordinances. (c) Variances may only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard,to afford relief. 10.34(Flood Insurance Notice. The Zoning Administrator must notify the applicant for a variance that:1)The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as$25 for$100 of insurance coverage;and 2)Such construction below the base or regional flood level increases risks to life and property.Such notification must be maintained with a record of all variance actions. I [Comment]CoE24]:Required. 10.35 General Considerations. The community may consider the following factors in granting variances and imposing conditions on variances and conditional uses in floodplains: (a)The potential danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments; (b)The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others; (c)The proposed water supply and sanitation systems,if any,and the ability of these systems to minimize the potential for disease,contamination and unsanitary conditions; (d)The susceptibility of any proposed use and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; (e)The importance of the services to be provided by the proposed use to the community; (f) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location; (g)The availability of viable alternative locations for the proposed use that are not subject to flooding; (h)The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future; Land Use Plan and flood plain management (i) The relationshipof the proposed use to the Comprehensiveg p p program for the area; (j) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; (k)The expected heights,velocity,duration,rate of rise and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. 10.36 Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources(DNR). The zoning administrator !designated body/community official)_must submit hearing notices for proposed variances to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days'notice of the hearing.The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S.Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 10.37 Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR. A copy of all decisions granting variances must be forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action.The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S.Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 10.38 Record-Keeping. The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of all variance actions,including justification for their issuance,and must report such variances in an annual or biennial report to the Administrator of the National Flood Insurance Program,when requested by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 10.4 Conditional Uses: 10.41 Administrative Review. An application for a conditional use permit under the provisions of this ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with Section(s)36-301—36-310-of the zoning ordinance/code. 10.42 Factors Used in Decision-Making. In passing upon conditional use applications,the(Caverning-Body)City Council must consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this ordinance,and those factors identified in Section 10.35 of this ordinance. 10.43 Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. The(Governing Body City Council may attach such conditions to the granting of conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance.Such conditions may include,but are not limited to,the following: (a) Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. (b) Limitations on period of use,occupancy,and operation. (c) Imposition of operational controls,sureties,and deed restrictions. (d) Requirements for construction of channel modifications,compensatory storage,dikes,levees,and other protective measures. (e) Floodproofing measures,in accordance with the State Building Code and this ordinance. The applicant must submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the Comment[Jess25]:Question for DNR floodproofing measures are consistent with the regulatory flood protection elevation and associated / "Can a house with a low floor below the BFE flood factors for the particular area. i be torn down and rebuilt as long as it uses the existing foundation?" 10.44 Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources(DNR). The(designate$ / i Zoning Administrator must submit hearing notices for proposed conditional uses / Question for DNR—"Would it constitute as a to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days'notice of the hearing.The notice may be ! taking if we didn't allow a house to be rebuilt sent by electronic mail or U.S.Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. oon an existing foundation that is below the 10.45 Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR.A copy of all decisions granting conditional uses must be • forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action.The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S.Mail / Comment[M626]:Any nonconformity would have to be rebuilt in conformance.I to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 1 don't see much of a reason why they wouldn't i SECTION 11.0 INONCONFORMITIESI j want to elevate if given the chance...would mean lower/no premiums and better protection.It would not be a taking. 11.1 Continuance of Nonconformities:A use,structure,or occupancy of land which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this ordinance but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance may be continued subject to the following conditions.Historic structures,as defined in Section 2.941(b)of this ordinance, are subject to the provisions of Sections 11.11—11.16 of this ordinance. 11.11 A nonconforming use,structure,or occupancy must not be expanded,changed,enlarged,or altered in a way that increases its flood damage potential or degree of obstruction to flood flows except as provided in 11.12 below.Expansion or enlargement of uses,structures or occupancies within the Floodway District is prohibited. 11.12 Any addition or structural alteration to a nonconforming structure or nonconforming use that would result in increasing its flood damage potential must be protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation in accordance with any of the elevation on fill or floodproofing techniques(i.e.,FP1 thru FP4 floodproofing classifications)allowable in the State Building Code,except as further restricted in 11.13 and 11.17 below. on all manpower or labor.) -- Comment[Jess27]:Based on input from ,. 4/27/16 meeting with Engineering,Planning, • _ _ and Assessing. than one year. 11.15 If any nonconformity is substantially damaged,as defined in Section 2.940 of this ordinance,it may not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance.The applicable provisions for establishing new uses or new structures in Sections 4.0 or 5.0 will apply depending upon whether the use or structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe,respectively. 11.17 Any substantial improvement,as defined in Section 2.941 of this ordinance,to a nonconforming structure requires that the existing structure and any additions must meet the requirements of Section 4.0 or 5.0 of this ordinance for new structures,depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District. SECTION 12.0 PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT 12.1 Violation Constitutes a Misdemeanor:Violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements(including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses)constitute a misdemeanor and will be punishable as defined by law. 12.2 Other Lawful Action:Nothing in this ordinance restricts the City of Edina from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation.If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the Zoning Administrator within the specified period of time,each additional day that lapses will constitute an additional violation of this ordinance and will be prosecuted accordingly. 12.3 Enforcement:Violations of the provisions of this ordinance will be investigated and resolved in accordance with the provisions of Section(s)36-369 through 36-371 of the zoning ordinance/code.In responding to a suspected ordinance violation,the Zoning Administrator and(Governing Body)council may utilize the full array of enforcement actions available to it including but not limited to prosecution and fines,injunctions,after-the-fact permits,orders for corrective measures or a request to the National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood insurance availability to the guilty party.The City of Edina must act in good faith to enforce these official controls and to correct ordinance violations to the extent possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. SECTION 13.0 AMENDMENTS 13.1 Floodplain Designation—Restrictions on Removal:The floodplain designation on the Official Zoning Map must not be removed from floodplain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regulatory flood protection elevation and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain.Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)if the Commissioner determines that,through other measures,lands are adequately protected for the intended use. 13.2 Amendments Require DNR Approval:All amendments to this ordinance must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)prior to adoption.The Commissioner must approve the amendment prior to community approval. 13.3 Map Revisions Require Ordinance Amendments.The floodplain district regulations must be amended to incorporate any revisions by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the floodplain maps adopted in Section 2.3 of this ordinance. EFFECTIVE DATE:This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval and publication,as required by law and/or charter. Adopted by the City Council City of Edina This of (Day) (Month) (Year) Attest: ,Mayor (Name of Elected Official) Attest: ,City Clerk (Name of Community Official) Stamp with Community Seal: ORDINANCE NO. 2016-14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36 REGARDING FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS The CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: CONTENTS DIVISION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND PURPOSE I DIVISION 2.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 DIVISION 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS 5 DIVISION 4.0 FLOODWAY DISTRICT (FW) 6 DIVISION 5.0 FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT (FF) 8 DIVISION 6.0 GENERAL FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT(GF) 10 DIVISION 7.0 LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 101 DIVISION 8.0 PUBLIC UTILITIES, RAILROADS, ROADS, AND BRIDGES 12 DIVISION 9.0 MANUFACTURED HOMES, MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS, AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. 12 DIVISION 10.0 ADMINISTRATION 12 DIVISION 11.0 NONCONFORMITIES 16 DIVISION 12.0 PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT 16 DIVISION 13.0 AMENDMENTS 17 ARTICLE X. FLOODPLAIN DISTRICTS DIVISION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND PURPOSE I.I Statutory Authorization: The legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103F and Chapter 462 delegated the responsibility to local government units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. 1.2 Purpose: 1.21 This ordinance regulates development in the flood hazard areas of the City of Edina. These flood hazard areas are subject to periodic inundation, which may result in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base. It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare by minimizing these losses and disruptions. 1.22 National Flood Insurance Program Compliance. This ordinance is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59 -78, as amended, so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. 1.23 This ordinance is also intended to preserve the natural characteristics and functions of watercourses and floodplains in order to moderate flood and stormwater impacts, improve Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 2 water quality, reduce soil erosion, protect aquatic and riparian habitat, provide recreational opportunities, provide aesthetic benefits and enhance community and economic development. DIVISION 2.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2.I How to Use This Ordinance: This ordinance adopts the floodplain maps applicable to the City of Edina and includes three floodplain districts: Floodway, Flood Fringe, and General Floodplain. 2.11 Where Floodway and Flood Fringe districts are delineated on the floodplain maps, the standards in Sections 4 or 5 will apply, depending on the location of a property. 2.12 Locations where Floodway and Flood Fringe districts are not delineated on the floodplain maps are considered to fall within the General Floodplain district. Within the General Floodplain district, the Floodway District standards in Section 4 apply unless the floodway boundary is determined, according to the process outlined in Section 6. Once the floodway boundary is determined, the Flood Fringe District standards in Section 5 may apply outside the floodway. 2.2 Lands to Which Ordinance Applies: This ordinance applies to all lands within the jurisdiction of the City of Edina shown on the Official Zoning Map and/or the attachments to the map as being located within the boundaries of the Floodway, Flood Fringe, or General Floodplain Districts. 2.21 The Floodway, Flood Fringe and General Floodplain Districts are overlay districts that are superimposed on all existing zoning districts. The standards imposed in the overlay districts are in addition to any other requirements in this ordinance. In case of a conflict, the more restrictive standards will apply. 2.3 Incorporation of Maps by Reference: The following maps together with all attached material are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of the Official Zoning Map and this ordinance. The attached material includes the Flood Insurance Study for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Incorporated Areas, dated November 4, 2016 and the Flood Insurance Rate Map panels enumerated below, dated November 4, 2016, all prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. These materials are on file in the Engineering Department. Effective Flood Insurance Rate Map panels: 27053C0342F 27053C0362F 27053C0432F 27053C0344F 27053C0363F 27053C0451F 27053C0361F 27053C0364F 27053C0452F 2.4 Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation: The regulatory flood protection elevation (RFPE) is an elevation no lower than two feet above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. 2.5 Interpretation: The boundaries of the zoning districts are determined by scaling distances on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. 2.5 I Where a conflict exists between the floodplain limits illustrated on the official zoning map and actual field conditions, the flood elevations shall be the governing factor. The Zoning Administrator must interpret the boundary location based on the ground elevations that existed on the site on the date of the first National Flood Insurance Program map showing the area within the regulatory floodplain, and other available technical data. Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 3 2.52 Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries will be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the Planning Commission and to submit technical evidence. 2.6 Abrogation and Greater Restrictions: It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or other private agreements. However, where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this ordinance prevail. All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. 2.7 Warning and Disclaimer of Liability: This ordinance does not imply that areas outside the floodplain districts or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance does not create liability on the part of the City of Edina or its officers or employees for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. 2.8 Severability: If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of law, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected and shall remain in full force. 2.9 Definitions: Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance must be interpreted according to common usage and so as to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. 2.91 I Accessory Use or Structure—as defined in section 36-10. 2.912 Base Flood Elevation—The elevation of the"regional flood."The term "base flood elevation" is used in the flood insurance survey. 2.913 Basement—any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base subgrade (below ground level) on all four sides, regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. 2.914 Conditional Use—as defined in section 36-10. 2.915 Critical Facilities—facilities necessary to a community's public health and safety, those that store or produce highly volatile, toxic or water-reactive materials, and those that house occupants that may be insufficiently mobile to avoid loss of life or injury. Examples of critical facilities include hospitals, correctional facilities, schools, daycare facilities, nursing homes, fire and police stations, wastewater treatment facilities, public electric utilities, water plants, fuel storage facilities, and waste handling and storage facilities. 2.916 Development—any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate, including buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations, or storage of equipment or materials. 2.917 Equal Degree of Encroachment—a method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that floodplain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows. 2.919 Flood—a temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. 2.920 Flood Frequency—the frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded. Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 4 2.921 Flood Fringe—the portion of the Special Flood Hazard Area (one percent annual chance flood) located outside of the floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term "floodway fringe" used in the Flood Insurance Study for Hennepin County, Minnesota. 2.922 Flood Insurance Rate Map -an official map on which the Federal Insurance Administrator has delineated both the special hazard areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. A FIRM that has been made available digitally is called a Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM). 2.923 Flood Prone Area—any land susceptible to being inundated by water from any source (see "Flood"). 2.924 Floodplain—the beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, lake or watercourse which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. 2.925 Floodproofing—a combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. 2.926 Floodway—the bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining floodplain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. 2.927 Lowest Floor—the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement). 2.928 Manufactured Home—a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached to the required utilities. The term "manufactured home" does not include the term "recreational vehicle." 2.929 New Construction - Structures, including additions and improvements, and placement of manufactured homes, for which the start of construction commenced on or after the effective date of this ordinance. 2.930 Obstruction—any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse,fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory floodplain which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. 2.931 One Hundred Year Floodplain— lands inundated by the"Regional Flood" (see definition). 2.932 Principal Use or Structure—as defined in section 36-10. 2.933 Reach—a hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach. 2.934 Recreational Vehicle—a vehicle that is built on a single chassis, is 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection, is designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck, and is designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use. For the purposes of this ordinance, the term recreational vehicle is synonymous with the term "travel trailer/travel vehicle." 2.935 Regional Flood—a flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 5 average frequency in the magnitude of the I%chance or 100-year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in a flood insurance study. 2.936 Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation (RFPE) - an elevation not less than two feet above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. 2.937 Special Flood Hazard Area—a term used for flood insurance purposes synonymous with "One Hundred Year Floodplain." 2.938 Start of Construction—includes substantial improvement, and means the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement or other improvement that occurred before the permit's expiration date. The actual start is either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement,footings, piers, foundations, or the erection of temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement, the actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building. 2.939 Structure- anything constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the ground or on- site utilities, including, but not limited to, buildings, factories, sheds, detached garages, cabins, manufactured homes, recreational vehicles not meeting the exemption criteria specified in Section 9.21 of this ordinance and other similar items. 2.940 Substantial Damage - means damage of any origin sustained by a structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. 2.941 Substantial Improvement -within any consecutive 365-day period, any reconstruction, rehabilitation (including normal maintenance and repair), repair after damage, addition, or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the"start of construction" of the improvement. This term includes structures that have incurred "substantial damage," regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either: (a)Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions. (b)Any alteration of a"historic structure," provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure." For the purpose of this ordinance, "historic structure" is as defined in 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 59.1. DIVISION 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS 3.1 Districts: 3.I I Floodway District. The Floodway District includes those areas within Zones AE that have a floodway delineated as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 2.3. For Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 6 lakes, wetlands and other basins within Zones A and AE that do not have a floodway delineated, the Floodway District also includes those areas that are at or below the ordinary high water level as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, subdivision 14. 3.12 Flood Fringe District. The Flood Fringe District includes areas within Zones AE that have a floodway delineated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 2.3, but are located outside of the floodway. For lakes, wetlands and other basins within Zones A and AE that do not have a floodway delineated, the Flood Fringe District also includes those areas below the I%annual chance (100-year) flood elevation but above the ordinary high water level as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, subdivision 14. 3.13 General Floodplain District. The General Floodplain District includes riverine areas within Zone A that do not have a delineated floodway as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map adopted in Section 2.3. 3.2 Applicability: Within the floodplain districts established in this ordinance, the use, size, type and location of development must comply with the terms of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. In no cases shall floodplain development adversely affect the efficiency or unduly restrict the capacity of the channels or floodways of any tributaries to the main stream, drainage ditches, or any other drainage facilities or systems. All uses not listed as permitted uses or conditional uses in Sections 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 are prohibited. In addition, critical facilities, as defined in Section 2.915, are prohibited in all floodplain districts. DIVISION 4.0 FLOODWAY DISTRICT (FW) 4.I Permitted Uses: The following uses, subject to the standards set forth in Section 4.2, are permitted uses if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay district: 4.I I General farming, pasture, grazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting. 4.12 Industrial-commercial loading areas, parking areas, and airport landing strips. 4.13 Open space uses, including but not limited to private and public golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic grounds, boat launching ramps, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, hunting and fishing areas, and single or multiple purpose recreational trails. 4.14 Residential lawns, gardens, parking areas, and play areas. 4.15 Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines and pipelines, provided that the Department of Natural Resources' Area Hydrologist is notified at least ten days prior to issuance of any permit. 4.2 Standards for Floodway Permitted Uses: 4.21 The use must have a low flood damage potential. 4.22 The use must not obstruct flood flows or cause any increase in flood elevations and must not involve structures, obstructions, or storage of materials or equipment. 4.23 Any facility that will be used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth (in feet) multiplied by the velocity (in feet per second) would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional (1%chance) flood. 4.3 Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses following the standards and procedures set forth in Section 10.4 of this ordinance and further subject to the standards set Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 7 forth in Section 4.4, if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable overlay district. 4.3 I Structures accessory to the uses listed in 4.I I —4.13 above. 4.34 Storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials. 4.35 Placement of fill. 4.4 Standards for Floodway Conditional Uses: 4.41 All Uses. A conditional use must not cause any increase in the stage of the I% chance or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. 4.42 Fill; Storage of Materials and Equipment: (a) The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. (b)Fill, dredge spoil, and other similar materials deposited or stored in the floodplain must be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, riprap or other acceptable method. Permanent sand and gravel operations and similar uses must be covered by a long-term site development plan. (c) Temporary placement of fill, other materials, or equipment which would cause an increase to the stage of the 1% percent chance or regional flood may only be allowed if the Council has approved a plan that assures removal of the materials from the floodway based upon the flood warning time available. 4.43 Accessory Structures.Accessory structures, as identified in Section 4.31, may be permitted, provided that: (a)structures are not intended for human habitation; (b)structures will have a low flood damage potential; (c)structures will be constructed and placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; (d) Service utilities, such as electrical and heating equipment, within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; (e) Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FPI or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code. All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls. (f) As an alternative, an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code, provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment and does not exceed 576 square feet in size. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: (I)To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and (2)There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 8 structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. 4.44 Structural works for flood control that will change the course, current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.245. 4.45 A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an increase to the 1% chance or regional flood.The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. 4.46 Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. DIVISION 5.0 FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT (FF) 5.I Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are those uses of land or structures allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) that comply with the standards in Sections 5.2. 5.2 Standards for Flood Fringe Permitted Uses: 5.2 I All structures, including accessory structures, must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor, as defined, is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation for structures must be no lower than one foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation and the fill must extend at the same elevation at least IS feet beyond the outside limits of the structure. 5.22 Accessory Structures. As an alternative to the fill requirements of section 5.21, structures accessory to the uses identified in Section 5.I may be permitted to be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code, provided that: (a)the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 576 square feet in size, and is only used for parking and storage. (b)All portions of floodproofed accessory structures below the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation must be: (i) adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls, (ii) be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage, and (iii) must have all service utilities be water-tight or elevated to above the regulatory flood protection elevation (c)Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: (1)To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic" openings in the outside walls of the structure, with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding; and (2)There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. 5.24 The storage of any materials or equipment must be elevated on fill to the regulatory flood protection elevation. Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 9 5.25 All service utilities, including ductwork, must be elevated or water-tight to prevent infiltration of floodwaters. 5.26 The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. 5.27 All fill must be properly compacted and the slopes must be properly protected by the use of riprap, vegetative cover or other acceptable method. 5.28 Accessory uses such as yards, railroad tracks,and parking lots may be at an elevation lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. However, any facilities used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth (in feet) multiplied by the velocity(in feet per second)would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional (I% chance) flood. 5.29 Interference with normal manufacturing/industrial plant operations must be minimized, especially along streams having protracted flood durations. In considering permit applications, due consideration must be given to the needs of industries with operations that require a floodplain location. 5.30 Manufactured homes and recreational vehicles must meet the standards of division 9 of this ordinance. 5.3 Conditional Uses: The following uses and activities may be allowed as conditional uses, if allowed in the underlying zoning district(s) or any applicable overlay district, following the procedures in Section 10.4 of this ordinance. 5.31 Any structure that is not elevated on fill or floodproofed in accordance with Sections 5.2 I and 5.22 of this ordinance. 5.32 Storage of any material or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation. 5.33 The cumulative placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill when the fill is not being used to elevate a structure in accordance with Section 5.21 of this ordinance. 5.4 Standards for Flood Fringe Conditional Uses: 5.41 The standards listed in Sections 5.24 through 5.30 apply to all conditional uses. 5.42 Basements, as defined by Section 2.913 of this ordinance, are subject to the following: (a) Residential basement construction is not allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (b) Non-residential basements may be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation provided the basement is structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with Section 5.43 of this ordinance. 5.43 All areas of nonresidential structures, including basements, to be placed below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be floodproofed in accordance with the structurally dry floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code. Structurally dry floodproofing must meet the FPI or FP2 floodproofing classification in the State Building Code, which requires making the structure watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 10 5.44 The placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill or other similar material on a parcel (other than for the purpose of elevating a structure to the regulatory flood protection elevation) must comply with an approved erosion/sedimentation control plan. (a) The plan must clearly specify methods to be used to stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum of the regional (I%chance) flood event. (b)The plan must be prepared and certified by a registered professional engineer or other qualified individual acceptable to the Council. (c)The plan may incorporate alternative procedures for removal of the material from the floodplain if adequate flood warning time exists. 5.45 Storage of materials and equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation must comply with an approved emergency plan providing for removal of such materials within the time available after a flood warning. DIVISION 6.0 GENERAL FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT (GF) 6.1 Permitted Uses: 6.I I The uses listed in Section 4.I of this ordinance, Floodway District Permitted Uses, are permitted uses. 6.12 All other uses are subject to the floodway/flood fringe evaluation criteria specified in Section 6.2 below. Section 4.0 applies if the proposed use is determined to be in the Floodway District. Section 5.0 applies if the proposed use is determined to be in the Flood Fringe District. 6.2 Procedures for Floodway and Flood Fringe Determinations: 6.21 Upon receipt of an application for a permit or other approval within the General Floodplain District, the Zoning Administrator must obtain, review and reasonably utilize any regional flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal, state, or other source. 6.22 If regional flood elevation and floodway data are not readily available, the applicant must furnish additional information, as needed, to determine the regulatory flood protection elevation and whether the proposed use would fall within the Floodway or Flood Fringe District. Information must be consistent with accepted hydrological and hydraulic engineering standards and the standards in 6.23 below. 6.23 The determination of floodway and flood fringe must include the following components, as applicable: (a) Estimate the peak discharge of the regional (I%chance)flood. (b) Calculate the water surface profile of the regional flood based upon a hydraulic analysis of the stream channel and overbank areas. (c) Compute the floodway necessary to convey or store the regional flood without increasing flood stages more than one-half(0.5) foot. A lesser stage increase than 0.5 foot is required if, as a result of the stage increase, increased flood damages would result. An equal degree of encroachment on both sides of the stream within the reach must be assumed in computing floodway boundaries. 6.24 The Zoning Administrator will review the submitted information and assess the technical evaluation and the recommended Floodway and/or Flood Fringe District boundary. The assessment must include the cumulative effects of previous floodway encroachments. The Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page I I Zoning Administrator may seek technical assistance from a designated engineer or other expert person or agency, including the Department of Natural Resources. Based on this assessment, the Zoning Administrator may approve or deny the application. 6.25 Once the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries have been determined, the Zoning Administrator must process the permit application consistent with the applicable provisions of Section 4.0 and 5.0 of this ordinance. DIVISION 7.0 LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.I In General: Recognizing that flood prone areas may exist outside of the designated floodplain districts, the requirements of this section apply to all land within the City of Edina. 7.2 Subdivisions: No land may be subdivided which is unsuitable for reasons of flooding or inadequate drainage, water supply or sewage treatment facilities. 7.21 All lots within the floodplain districts must be able to contain a building site outside of the Floodway District at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. 7.22 All subdivisions must have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation, unless a flood warning emergency plan for the safe evacuation of all vehicles and people during the regional (I% chance) flood has been approved by the Council. The plan must be prepared by a registered engineer or other qualified individual, and must demonstrate that adequate time and personnel exist to carry out the evacuation. 7.23 For all subdivisions in the floodplain, the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries, the regulatory flood protection elevation and the required elevation of all access roads must be clearly labeled on all required subdivision drawings and platting documents. 7.24 In the General Floodplain District, applicants must provide the information required in Section 6.2 of this ordinance to determine the regional flood elevation, the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries and the regulatory flood protection elevation for the subdivision site. 7.25 If a subdivision proposal or other proposed new development is in a flood prone area, any such proposal must be reviewed to assure that: (a) All such proposals are consistent with the need to minimize flood damage within the flood prone area, (b) All public utilities and facilities, such as sewer,gas, electrical, and water systems are located and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage, and (c) Adequate drainage is provided to reduce exposure of flood hazard. 7.3 Building Sites. If a proposed building site is in a flood prone area, all new construction (including the placement of manufactured homes) must be: (a)Designed (or modified) and adequately anchored to prevent floatation, collapse, or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy; (b) Constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; (c) Constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 12 (d) Constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding; and (e) Approved by the City Engineer. DIVISION 8.0 PUBLIC UTILITIES, RAILROADS, ROADS,AND BRIDGES 8.I Public Utilities: All public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems to be located in the floodplain must be floodproofed in accordance with the State Building Code, industry standards, or elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation. 8.2 Public Transportation Facilities: Railroad tracks, roads, and bridges to be located within the floodplain must comply with Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this ordinance. These transportation facilities must be elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation where failure or interruption of these facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area. Minor or auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. 8.3 On-site Water Supply and Sewage Treatment Systems: Where public utilities are not provided: I) On-site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725.4350, as amended; and 2) New or replacement on-site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters, they must not be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding, and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.2270, as amended. DIVISION 9.0 MANUFACTURED HOMES, MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS,AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. 9.I Manufactured Homes: New manufactured home parks and expansions to existing manufactured home parks are prohibited in any floodplain district. 9.I I Placement or replacement of manufactured home units is prohibited in the Floodway District. 9.2 Recreational Vehicles: New recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds and expansions to existing recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds are prohibited in any floodplain district. Temporary storage of recreational vehicles in the floodplain must meet the exemption criteria below. 9.2 I Criteria for exempt recreational vehicles (a)The vehicle must have a current license required for highway use. (b)The vehicle must be highway ready, meaning on wheels or the internal jacking system, attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities. DIVISION 10.0 ADMINISTRATION 10.I Zoning Administrator: A Zoning Administrator or other official designated by the City of Edina must administer and enforce this ordinance. 10.2 Permit Requirements: 10.21 Permit Required. A permit must be obtained from the Zoning Administrator prior to conducting the following activities: Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 13 (a)The erection, addition, modification, rehabilitation, or alteration of any building, structure, or portion thereof. Normal maintenance and repair also requires a permit if such work, separately or in conjunction with other planned work, constitutes a substantial improvement as defined in this ordinance. (b)The use or change of use of a building, structure, or land. (c)The construction of a dam, fence, or on-site septic system. (d)The change or extension of a nonconforming use. (e)The repair of a structure that has been damaged by flood, fire, tornado, or any other source. (f) The placement of fill, excavation of materials, or the storage of materials or equipment within the floodplain. (g) Relocation or alteration of a watercourse (including new or replacement culverts and bridges), unless a public waters work permit has been applied for. (h)Any other type of"development" as defined in this ordinance. 10.22 Application for Permit. Permit applications must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator on forms provided by the Zoning Administrator. The permit application must include the information required in Sec. 36-129. 10.23 Certificate of Zoning Compliance for a New, Altered, or Nonconforming Use. No building, land or structure may be occupied or used in any manner until a certificate of zoning compliance has been issued by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. 10.24 Certification. The applicant is required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. Floodproofing measures must be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. 10.25 Record of First Floor Elevation. The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new structures and alterations or additions to existing structures in the floodplain. The Zoning Administrator must also maintain a record of the elevation to which structures and alterations or additions to structures are flood proofed. 10.26 Notifications for Watercourse Alterations. Before authorizing any alteration or relocation of a river or stream, the Zoning Administrator must notify adjacent communities. If the applicant has applied for a permit to work in public waters pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.245,this will suffice as adequate notice. A copy of the notification must also be submitted to the Chicago Regional Office of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 10.27 Notification to FEMA When Physical Changes Increase or Decrease Base Flood Elevations. As soon as is practicable, but not later than six months after the date such supporting information becomes available, the Zoning Administrator must notify the Chicago Regional Office of FEMA of the changes by submitting a copy of the relevant technical or scientific data. 10.3 Variances: Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 14 10.3 I Variance Applications. An application for a variance to the provisions of this ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with applicable state statutes and Sections 36-95 through 36-104 of the zoning ordinance/code. 10.32 Adherence to State Floodplain Management Standards. A variance must not allow a use that is not allowed in that district, permit a lower degree of flood protection than the regulatory flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standards lower than those required by state law. 10.33 Additional Variance Criteria. The following additional variance criteria of the Federal Emergency Management Agency must be satisfied: (a Variances must not be issued by a community within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. (b) Variances may only be issued by a community upon (i) a showing of good and sufficient cause, (ii) a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant, and (iii) a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. (c)Variances may only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. 10.34 Flood Insurance Notice. The Zoning Administrator must notify the applicant for a variance that: I) The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as $25 for$100 of insurance coverage; and 2) Such construction below the base or regional flood level increases risks to life and property. Such notification must be maintained with a record of all variance actions. 10.35 General Considerations. The community may consider the following factors in granting variances and imposing conditions on variances and conditional uses in floodplains: (a)The potential danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments; (b)The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others; (c)The proposed water supply and sanitation systems, if any, and the ability of these systems to minimize the potential for disease, contamination and unsanitary conditions; (d)The susceptibility of any proposed use and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; (e)The importance of the services to be provided by the proposed use to the community; (f) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location; (g)The availability of viable alternative locations for the proposed use that are not subject to flooding; (h)The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future; Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 15 (i) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and flood plain management program for the area; (j) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; (k)The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. 10.36 Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Zoning Administrator must submit hearing notices for proposed variances to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days' notice of the hearing. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 10.37 Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR. A copy of all decisions granting variances must be forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 10.38 Recordkeeping. The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, and must report such variances in an annual or biennial report to the Administrator of the National Flood Insurance Program, when requested by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 10.4 Conditional Uses: 10.41 Administrative Review. An application for a conditional use permit under the provisions of this ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with Section(s) 36-30I —36-310 of the zoning ordinance/code. 10.42 Factors Used in Decision-Making. In passing upon conditional use applications, the City Council must consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this ordinance, and those factors identified in Section 10.35 of this ordinance. 10.43 Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. The City Council may attach such conditions to the granting of conditional use permits as it deems necessary to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. (b) Limitations on period of use, occupancy, and operation. (c) Imposition of operational controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. (d) Requirements for construction of channel modifications, compensatory storage, dikes, levees, and other protective measures. (e) Floodproofing measures, in accordance with the State Building Code and this ordinance. The applicant must submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing measures are consistent with the regulatory flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. 10.44 Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The Zoning Administrator must submit hearing notices for proposed conditional uses to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days' notice of the hearing.The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 10.45 Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR.A copy of all decisions granting conditional uses must be forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 16 DIVISION ILO NONCONFORMITIES 11.1 Continuance of Nonconformities: A use, structure, or occupancy of land which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this ordinance but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance may be continued subject to the following conditions. Historic structures, as defined in Section 2.941(b) of this ordinance, are subject to the provisions of Sections I I.I I — I I.15 of this ordinance. 1 1.I I A nonconforming use, structure, or occupancy must not be expanded, changed, enlarged, or altered in a way that increases its flood damage potential or degree of obstruction to flood flows except as provided in 11.12 below. Expansion or enlargement of uses, structures or occupancies within the Floodway District is prohibited. 11.12 Any addition or structural alteration to a nonconforming structure or nonconforming use that would result in increasing its flood damage potential must be protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation in accordance with any of the elevation on fill or floodproofing techniques (i.e., FPI thru FP4 floodproofing classifications) allowable in the State Building Code, except as further restricted in I I.17 below. 11.15 If any nonconformity is substantially damaged, as defined in Section 2.940 of this ordinance, it may not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. The applicable provisions for establishing new uses or new structures in Sections 4.0 or 5.0 will apply depending upon whether the use or structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe, respectively. 11.17 Any substantial improvement, as defined in Section 2.941 of this ordinance, to a nonconforming structure requires that the existing structure and any additions must meet the • requirements of Section 4.0 or 5.0 of this ordinance for new structures, depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District. DIVISION 12.0 PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT 12.I Violation Constitutes a Misdemeanor: Violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) constitute a misdemeanor and will be punishable as defined by law. 12.2 Other Lawful Action: Nothing in this ordinance restricts the City of Edina from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the Zoning Administrator within the specified period of time, each additional day that lapses will constitute an additional violation of this ordinance and will be prosecuted accordingly. 12.3 Enforcement:Violations of the provisions of this ordinance will be investigated and resolved in accordance with the provisions of Section(s) 36-369 through 36-371 of the zoning ordinance/code. In responding to a suspected ordinance violation, the Zoning Administrator and Council may utilize the full array of enforcement actions available to it including but not limited to prosecution and fines, injunctions, after-the-fact permits, orders for corrective measures or a request to the National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood insurance availability to the guilty party. The City of Edina must act in good faith to enforce these official controls and to correct ordinance violations to the extent possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. Ordinance No. 2016-14 Page 17 DIVISION 13.0 AMENDMENTS 13.1 Floodplain esignation® Restrictions on Removal: The floodplain designation on the Official Zoning Map must not be removed from floodplain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regulatory flood protection elevation and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain. Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) if the Commissioner determines that,through other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use. 13.2 Amendments Require DNR Approval: All amendments to this ordinance must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) prior to adoption. The Commissioner must approve the amendment prior to community approval. 13.3 Map Revisions Require Ordinance Amendments. The floodplain district regulations must be amended to incorporate any revisions by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the floodplain maps adopted in Section 2.3 of this ordinance. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval and publication, as required by law and/or charter. First Reading: October 18, 2016 Second Reading: Waived Published: October 27, 2016 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: October 27, 2016 Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk Minnesota Sample Floodplain Ordinance Three District Ordinance to- This sample ordinance includes the three primary types of floodplain districts:Floodway, Flood Fringe, and General Floodplain. It can be used in a variety of situations, where all three MNDNRdistricts or only some of them are present. Contents SECTION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND PURPOSE 2 SECTION 2.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 SECTION 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS 7 SECTION 4.0 FLOODWAY DISTRICT(FW) 7 SECTION 5.0 FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT(FF) 9 SECTION 6.0 GENERAL FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT(GF) 12 SECTION 7.0 LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 13 SECTION 8.0 PUBLIC UTILITIES, RAILROADS, ROADS,AND BRIDGES 14 SECTION 9.0 MANUFACTURED HOMES, MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS,AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES 14 SECTION 10.0 ADMINISTRATION 15 SECTION 11.0 NONCONFORMITIES 19 SECTION 12.0 PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT 20 SECTION 13.0 AMENDMENTS 20 Ordinance Language Commentary SECTION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION,FINDINGS OF FACT AND PURPOSE e94 1.1 Statutory Authorization: The legislature of the State of Minnesota has,in Minnesota Statutes 1.1.bis mandatory lfanguage. Thhe zoning Chapter 103F and Chapter[394/462]delegated the responsibility to local government units to for counties and hapter4lsfarctie and counties ad Chapter 462 for cities and adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses.Therefore,the(City Council/Board of townships. Commissioners)of(community), Minnesota,does ordain as follows. "Governing body"is the City Council or County or Township Board. 1.2 Purpose: 1.21 This ordinance regulates development in the flood hazard areas of(community). 1.2171.22 is mandatory language These flood hazard areas are subject to periodic inundation,which may result in loss of life and property,health and safety hazards,disruption of commerce and governmental services,extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief,and impairment of the tax base.It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health,safety,and general welfare by minimizing these losses and disruptions. 1.22 National Flood Insurance Program Compliance. This ordinance is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59-78,as amended,so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. 1.23 This ordinance is also intended to preserve the natural characteristics and 1.23 is optional language referencing the functions of watercourses and floodplains in order to moderate flood and natural beneficial functions of floodplains. stormwater impacts,improve water quality,reduce soil erosion,protect aquatic and riparian habitat,provide recreational opportunities,provide aesthetic benefits and enhance community and economic development. SECTION 2.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2.1 How to Use This Ordinance: This ordinance adopts the floodplain maps applicable to Th(community)and includes three floodplain districts:Floodway, Flood Fringe,and General coemunis ywiooary,dpdplain ndingoes nntina community will vary,depending on Floodplain. hydrologic conditions and the level of detail of the applicable maps. 2.11 Where Floodway and Flood Fringe districts are delineated on the floodplain maps,the standards in Sections 4 or 5 will apply,depending on the location of a property. 2.12 Locations where Floodway and Flood Fringe districts are not delineated on the If the General Floodplain District(theA floodplain maps are considered to fall within the General Floodplain district. zone or other zones without a defined floWithin the General Floodplain district,the Floodway District standards in Section community,odway) referencesnot cent in tue to it,including the 4 apply unless the floodway boundary is determined,according to the process provisions of Section 6,may be deleted but outlined in Section 6.Once the floodway boundary is determined,the Flood Section6shouldbe"reserved for future Fringe District standards in Section 5 may apply outside the floodway. use"(Le.,in case a future annexation adds an A zone). 2.2 Lands to Which Ordinance Applies: This ordinance applies to all lands within the jurisdiction of(Community)shown on the Official Zoning Map and/or the attachments to the map as being located within the boundaries of the Floodway,Flood Fringe,or General Floodplain Districts. 2.21 The Floodway,Flood Fringe and General Floodplain Districts are overlay districts 2.21 is optional-if the community has a that are superimposed on all existing zoning districts.The standards imposed in zoning ordinance-as most do-it's helpful the overlay districts are in addition to any other requirements in this ordinance. to definethese districts as overlaydistricts. In case of a conflict,the more restrictive standards will apply. If not,then delete this statement and other overlay references. 2.3 Incorporation of Maps by Reference: The following maps together with all attached 2.3 is mandatory language.Each material are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of the Official Zoning community must adopt the Flood Insurance Map and this ordinance.The attached material includes the Flood Insurance Study for Study and specific map panels that County,Minnesota,and Incorporated Areas,dated encompass its boundaries.Under and the Flood Insurance Rate Map panels enumerated below,dated Minnesota Rules 6120.5700,these all prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.These materials are on file materials are considered attachments to the Zoning Map. in the(list location where maps will be filed—i.e.,City Clerk's office). Listing of maps will vary by jurisdiction and (list all map panels here) map type. • For communities with older maps, such as Flood Hazard Boundary Maps, in addition to Flood Insurance Rate Maps,these maps should also be listed in Section 2.3. • For counties,the map index may be used in lieu of listing all the map panels individually. Cities may need to adopt other map panels to encompass areas that may be annexed in the future.Counties and townships may need to adopt city map panels to encompass areas that may be detached from cities.See Section 2.10&2.11 Communities may also adopt preliminary flood studies and/or other best available data for regulatory purposes. 2.4 Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation: The regulatory flood protection elevation(RFPE) 2.4 is optional-Reiterates information in is an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any the(mandatory)definition of this term in increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from Section 2.9.The RFPE can be increased beyond one foot to provide enhanced flood designation of a floodway. protection. (In A-O zones,add more detailed language: "Within the AO Zone,the RFPE is an elevation no lower than(the number shown on the FIRM)above the highest adjacent grade of an existing structure or proposed structure or a proposed structural addition.") 2.5 Interpretation: The boundaries of the zoning districts are determined by scaling distances on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. 2.51 Where a conflict exists between the floodplain limits illustrated on the official zoning map and actual field conditions,the flood elevations shall be the governing factor.The Zoning Administrator must interpret the boundary location based on the ground elevations that existed on the site on the date of the first National Flood Insurance Program map showing the area within the regulatory floodplain,and other available technical data. 2.52 Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries will be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the(Planning Commission/Board of Adjustment)and to submit technical evidence. 2.6 Abrogation and Greater Restrictions: It is not intended by this ordinance to repeal, abrogate,or impair any existing easements,covenants,or other private agreements. However,where this ordinance imposes greater restrictions,the provisions of this ordinance prevail.All other ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of the inconsistency only. 2.7 Warning and Disclaimer of Liability: This ordinance does not imply that areas outside the floodplain districts or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages.This ordinance does not create liability on the part of (community)or its officers or employees for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made hereunder. 2.8 Severability: If any section,clause,provision,or portion of this ordinance is adjudged 2.8 This statement not needed if already unconstitutional or invalid by a court of law,the remainder of this ordinance shall not be included in zoning ordinance affected and shall remain in full force. 2.9 Definitions: Unless specifically defined below,words or phrases used in this ordinance These definitions may already exist as part must be interpreted according to common usage and so as to give this ordinance its of zoning ordinance,but check for most reasonable application. consistency.Definitions are mandatory unless otherwise indicated. 2.911 Accessory Use or Structure-a use or structure on the same lot with,and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to,the principal use or structure. 2.912 Base Flood Elevation-The elevation of the"regional flood."The term"base 2.912 is an optional definition flood elevation"is used in the flood insurance survey. 2.913 Basement-any area of a structure,including crawl spaces,having its floor or base subgrade(below ground level)on all four sides,regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. 2.914 Conditional Use-a specific type of structure or land use listed in the official 2.914 is on optional definition-check control that may be allowed but only after an in-depth review procedure and against zoning ordinance. Some local with appropriate conditions or restrictions as provided in the official zoning ordinances-and the state rules that apply controls or building codes and upon a finding that: to floodplain-use the older term"special use." (a) Certain conditions as detailed in the zoning ordinance exist. (b)The structure and/or land use conform to the comprehensive land use plan if one exists and are compatible with the existing neighborhood. 2.915 Critical Facilities-facilities necessary to a community's public health and safety, 2.915 is an optional definition-seethe those that store or produce highly volatile,toxic or water-reactive materials,and (optional)regulation of critical facilities in those that house occupants that may be insufficiently mobile to avoid loss of life Section 3.2. or injury. Examples of critical facilities include hospitals,correctional facilities, schools,daycare facilities,nursing homes,fire and police stations,wastewater treatment facilities, public electric utilities,water plants,fuel storage facilities, and waste handling and storage facilities. 2.916 Development-any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate, including buildings or other structures,mining,dredging,filling,grading,paving, excavation or drilling operations,or storage of equipment or materials. 2.917 Equal Degree of Encroachment-a method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that floodplain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows. 2.918 Farm Fence-A fence as defined by Minn.Statutes Section 344.02,Subd.1(a)-(d). 2.918 is an optional definition-to be used An open type fence of posts and wire is not considered to be a structure under if this type of farm fence is to be exempted from permit requirements this ordinance.Fences that have the potential to obstruct flood flows,such as chain link fences and rigid walls,are regulated as structures under this ordinance. 2.919 Flood-a temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a 2.919.Optional definition wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. 2.920 Flood Frequency-the frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood 2.920.Optional definition stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded. 2.921 Flood Fringe-the portion of the Special Flood Hazard Area(one percent annual 2.921.For cities mapped as part of county- chance flood)located outside of the floodway.Flood fringe is synonymous with wide flood insurance study,the county the term"floodway fringe" used in the Flood Insurance Study for(community), name should be inserted here. Minnesota. 2.922 Flood Prone Area-any land susceptible to being inundated by water from any 2.922 is an optional definition-see source(see"Flood"). provisions of Section 7 on flood prone areas 2.923 Floodplain—the beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, lake or watercourse which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. 2.924 Floodproofing—a combination of structural provisions,changes,or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding,primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. 2.925 Floodway—the bed of a wetland or lake and the channel of a watercourse and those portions of the adjoining floodplain which are reasonably required to carry or store the regional flood discharge. 2.926 Lowest Floor—the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area(including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure,used solely for parking of vehicles, building access,or storage in an area other than a basement area,is not considered a building's lowest floor;provided,that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirements of 44 Code of Federal Regulations,Part 60.3. 2.927 Manufactured Home—a structure,transportable in one or more sections,which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached to the required utilities.The term "manufactured home"does not include the term"recreational vehicle." 2.928 New Construction-Structures,including additions and improvements,and placement of manufactured homes,for which the start of construction commenced on or after the effective date of this ordinance. 2.929 Obstruction—any dam,wall,wharf,embankment,levee,dike,pile,abutment, 2.929.Optional definition projection,excavation,channel modification,culvert,building,wire,fence, stockpile,refuse,fill,structure,or matter in,along,across,or projecting into any channel,watercourse,or regulatory floodplain which may impede, retard,or change the direction of the flow of water,either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. 2.930 One Hundred Year Floodplain—lands inundated by the"Regional Flood"(see definition). 2.931 Principal Use or Structure—all uses or structures that are not accessory uses or 2.931.Optional definition structures. 2.932 Reach—a hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a 2.932.Optional definition stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction.In an urban area,the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach. 2.933 Recreational Vehicle—a vehicle that is built on a single chassis,is 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection,is designed to be self- propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck,and is designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational,camping,travel,or seasonal use. For the purposes of this ordinance, the term recreational vehicle is synonymous with the term"travel trailer/travel vehicle." 2.934 Regional Flood—a flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 1%chance or 100-year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term"base flood" used in a flood insurance study. 2.935 Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation(RFPE)-an elevation not less than one 2.935.The one-foot elevation is mandated foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood bystate easaw,data ectionhigher elevation can yield increased protection. elevation caused by encroachments on the floodplain that result from designation of a floodway. 2.936 Repetitive Loss:Flood related damages sustained by a structure on two separate 2.936.This is an optional definition linked occasions during a ten year period for which the cost of repairs at the time of to the optional provision for repetitive loss properties in Section 11.16. each such flood event on the average equals or exceeds 25%of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. 2.937 Special Flood Hazard Area-a term used for flood insurance purposes synonymous with"One Hundred Year Floodplain." 2.938 Start of Construction-includes substantial improvement,and means the actual start of construction,repair,reconstruction,rehabilitation,addition,placement or other improvement that occurred before the permit's expiration date.The actual start is either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site,such as the pouring of slab or footings,the installation of piles,the construction of columns,or any work beyond the stage of excavation;or the placement of a manufactured home on a foundation.Permanent construction does not include land preparation,such as clearing,grading and filling;nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways;nor does it include excavation for a basement,footings,piers,foundations,or the erection of temporary forms;nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings,such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure.For a substantial improvement,the actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall,ceiling,floor,or other structural part of a building,whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the building. 2.939 Structure-anything constructed or erected on the ground or attached to the ground or on-site utilities,including,but not limited to, buildings,factories, sheds,detached garages,cabins,manufactured homes, recreational vehicles not meeting the exemption criteria specified in Section 9.22 of this ordinance and other similar items. 2.940 Substantial Damage-means damage of any origin sustained by a structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. 2.941 Substantial Improvement-within any consecutive 365-day period,any reconstruction,rehabilitation(including normal maintenance and repair),repair after damage,addition,or other improvement of a structure,the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction"of the improvement.This term includes structures that have incurred"substantial damage," regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not,however,include either: (a)Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health,sanitary,or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions. (b)Any alteration of a "historic structure,"provided that the alteration will not 2.941(b)."Historic structures"as defined in preclude the structure's continued designation as a"historic structure."For the CFR generally include sites listed on or the purpose of this ordinance,"historic structure is as defined in 44 Code of eligible for the Notional Register of Historic Places and state-or locally-designated Federal Regulations,Part 59.1. historic properties. 2.10 Annexations: The Flood Insurance Rate Map panels adopted by reference into Section 2.10 applies to cities only.It is optional but 2.3 above may include floodplain areas that lie outside of the corporate boundaries of recommended-if not included,any the(community)at the time of adoption of this ordinance. If any of these floodplain land areas are annexed into the(community)after the date of adoption of this ordinance,the annexation will trigger an amendment of newly annexed floodplain lands will be subject to the provisions of this ordinance the floodplain ordinance. immediately upon the date of annexation. 2.11 Detachments. The Flood Insurance Rate Map panels adopted by reference into Section Section 2.11 applies only to counties or 2.3 above will include floodplain areas that lie inside the corporate boundaries of townships that exercise zoning authority. municipalities at the time of adoption of this ordinance. If any of these floodplain land Counties may choose to adopt specific map areas are detached from a municipality and come under the jurisdiction of(community) panels or adopt the countywide map index. after the date of adoption of this ordinance,the newly detached floodplain lands will be subject to the provisions of this ordinance immediately upon the date of detachment. SECTION 3.0 ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONING DISTRICTS 3.1 Districts: 3.11 Floodway District. The Floodway District includes those areas within Zones 3.11.For lakes,ponds and wetlands,the AE/AO/AH (that have a floodway delineated)as shown on the Flood Insurance floodway is usually administratively defined as the area at or below the Ordinary High Rate Map adopted in Section 2.3. Water Level. 3.12 Flood Fringe District. The Flood Fringe District includes areas within Zones 3.12&3.13.If a community has floodplain AE/AO/AH(that have a floodway delineated)on the Flood Insurance Rate Map delineations on the FIRM for lakes,ponds adopted in Section 2.3,but located outside of the floodway. and wetland without delineated floodways, contact DNR Floodplain Program staff for 3.13 General Floodplain District. The General Floodplain District includes those areas specific language. within(Zone A or Zones AE/AO/AH)as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map Zones AO and AH are areas prone to adopted in Section 2.3. flooding due to overland flow or small ponds,and are not typically found on most FIRMs. If not present,references in 3.12 3.2 Applicability: Within the floodplain districts established in this ordinance,the and 3.13 can be deleted. use,size,type and location of development must comply with the terms of this 3.2.The last sentence is optional,but ordinance and other applicable regulations. In no cases shall floodplain development recommended language that would adversely affect the efficiency or unduly restrict the capacity of the channels or prohibit critical facilities in all floodplain dfloodways of any tributaries to the main stream,drainage ditches,or anyother drainage standardar. iTntes r aahigher to a keep critical intended to critical facilities or systems.All uses not listed as permitted uses or conditional uses in Sections infrastructure and concentrations of people 4.0,5.0 and 6.0 are prohibited.In addition,critical facilities,as defined in Section 2.915, out of floodplain areas. are prohibited in all floodplain districts. SECTION 4.0 FLOODWAY DISTRICT(FW) 4.1 Permitted Uses: The following uses,subject to the standards set forth in Section 4.2,are permitted uses if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning district or any applicable 4.0.It is critical that the floodway be protected so that it can transport and store overlay district: the waters of the regional(100-year)flood ghts or 4.11 General farming,pasture,grazing,outdoorplant nurseries, horticulture,truck without or aflood ublicheal g g, velocities or threats to public health and farming,forestry,sod farming,and wild crop harvesting. safety. Note that communities are not required to 4.12 Industrial-commercial loading areas,parking areas,and airport landing strips. adopt all of the listed uses,but must provide for some use of the floodway land. 4.13 Open space uses,including but not limited to private and public golf courses, Other similar uses may be included in this tennis courts,driving ranges,archery ranges,picnic grounds,boat launching section if they meet the standards in ramps,swimming areas,parks,wildlife and nature preserves,game farms,fish Section 4.2. If a community wishes to hatcheries,shooting preserves,hunting and fishing areas,and single or multiple restrict all floodplain districts to only these oserecreationaltrails. permitted floodway uses,that could be purpose carried out through the DNR's model 4.14 Residential lawns,gardens,parking areas,and play areas. "Restrictive Ordinance." 4.15 Railroads,streets,bridges,utility transmission lines and pipelines,provided that the Department of Natural Resources'Area Hydrologist is notified at least ten 4.15.Earlier versions of the DNR sample days prior to issuance of any permit. ordinances listed utility and transportation uses as conditional uses. In this version, these uses are permitted if DNR is notified 4.2 Standards for Floodway Permitted Uses: and certain standards are met 4.21 The use must have a low flood damage potential. 4.2.Higher standards for floodway protection could include limiting impervious 4.22 the use must not obstruct flood flows or cause any increase in flood elevations coverage in the floodway,in order to and must not involve structures,obstructions,or storage of materials or facilitate infiltration of rainfall. equipment. 4.23 Any facility that will be used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth (in feet)multiplied by the velocity(in feet per second)would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional(1%chance)flood. 4.3 Conditional Uses: The following uses may be allowed as conditional uses following the standards and procedures set forth in Section 10.4 of this ordinance and further subject 4.3.Note that these conditional uses are to the standards set forth in Section 4.4, if otherwise allowed in the underlying zoning optional for the community but if allowed, district or any applicable overlay district. must meet the standards in Sections 4.4. Communities are encouraged to select only 4.31 Structures accessory to the uses listed in 4.11-4.13 above and the uses listed in those conditional uses that are appropriate 4.32-4.33 below. for their community. 4.32 Extraction and storage of sand,gravel,and other materials. 4.33 Marinas,boat rentals,docks,piers,wharves,and water control structures. 4.34 Storage yards for equipment, machinery,or materials. 4.35 Placement of fill or construction of fences that obstruct flood flows.Farm fences, as defined in section 2.918,are permitted uses. 4.35.Optional statement in 4.35 allows typical farm fences such as barbed wire fences that don't obstruct flood flows as 4.36 Travel-ready recreational vehicles meeting the exception standards in Section permitted uses. See also Section 10.21(c). 9.3. 4.36 is optional.We recommend treating 4.37 Levees or dikes intended to protect agricultural crops for a frequency flood event recreational vehicles as a conditional use so equal to or less than the 10-year frequency flood event. that road access and warning systems are carefully reviewed to ensure public safety in 4.4 Standards for Floodway Conditional Uses: times of flooding. 4.41 All Uses. A conditional use must not cause any increase in the stage of the 1% 4.4.Note that flood control projects chance or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or intended to remove areas from the floodway to allow development of single or reaches affected. multiple structures are not permitted unless a Letter of Map Revision(LOMR)can be obtained to change the floodway boundary. Contact DNR Floodplain Program staff for 4.42 Fill;Storage of Materials and Equipment: further information. (a) The storage or processing of materials that are,in time of flooding, 4.42(a)and(b)must be included if flammable,explosive,or potentially injurious to human,animal,or plant life is deposition or storage of fill is allowed in the prohibited. floodway (b) Fill,dredge spoil,and other similar materials deposited or stored in the floodplain must be protected from erosion by vegetative cover,mulching, riprap or other acceptable method.Permanent sand and gravel operations and similar uses must be covered by a long-term site development plan. (c) Temporary placement of fill,other materials,or equipment which would cause an increase to the stage of the 1%percent chance or regional flood may 4.42(c)is an optional alternative allowing only be allowed if the(Governing Body)has approved a plan that assures temporary storage of fill or other materials removal of the materials from the floodway based upon the flood warning that could increase flood stage,suitable for time available. locations where adequate flood warning times will be available to allow removal of 4.43 Accessory Structures.Accessory structures,as identified in Section 4.31, may be materials. permitted,provided that: (a)structures are not intended for human habitation; 4.43.If accessory structures are to be allowed in the floodway,items(a)through (b)structures will have a low flood damage potential; (d)are required. (c) structures will be constructed an placed so as to offer a minimal obstruction to the flow of flood waters; (d)Service utilities,such as electrical and heating equipment,within these structures must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly floodproofed; (e) Structures must be elevated on fill or structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code.All floodproofed structures must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation,collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic 4.43(e)is optional language allowing for wet floodproofing of small accessory flood forces on exterior walls. structures that constitute a minimal (f) As an alternative,an accessory structure may be internally/wet floodproofed investment. to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code, provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment and does not exceed 576 square feet in size. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: (1)To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure,there must be a minimum of two"automatic"openings in the outside walls of the structure,with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding;and (2)There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. 4.44 Structural works for flood control that will change the course,current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters are subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,Section 103G.245. 4.44 is an optional provision providing notice that work in public waters requires a 4.45 A levee,dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway must not cause an DNR permit. increase to the 1%chance or regional flood.The technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. 4.46 Floodway developments must not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining floodplain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system. SECTION 5.0 FLOOD FRINGE DISTRICT(FF) 5.1 Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are those uses of land or structures allowed in the underlying zoning district(s)that comply with the standards in Sections 5.2.If no pre- existing,underlying zoning districts exist,then any residential or nonresidential structure or use of a structure or land is a permitted use provided it does not constitute a public 5.1.If underlying zoning district(s)are present(as in most communities)the nuisance. second sentence can be deleted. 5.2 Standards for Flood Fringe Permitted Uses: 5.21 All structures,including accessory structures,must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor,as defined,is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation for structures must be no lower than one foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation and the fill must extend at the same 5.21."Lowest floor"is defined as the lowest elevation at least 15 feet beyond the outside limits of the structure. floor of the lowest enclosed area,including basements,crawl spaces,etc. See Section 2.926. 5.22 Accessory Structures.As an alternative to the fill requirements of section 5.21, structures accessory to the uses identified in Section 5.1 may be permitted to be internally/wet floodproofed to the FP3 or FP4 floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code,provided that: (a)the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment,does not exceed 576 square feet in size,and is only used for parking and storage. 5.22(a).A special note that the bulk standards here slightly exceed those allowed through 6120.330(Subp 3)(H)of (b)All portions of floodproofed accessory structures below the Regulatory Flood the Shoreland Rules. Protection Elevation must be:(i)adequately anchored to prevent flotation, 5.22(b).If an accessory structure exceeds collapse or lateral movement and designed to equalize hydrostatic flood 576 square feet,then FEMA will not allow forces on exterior walls,(ii)be constructed with materials resistant to flood internal floodproofing,and the structure damage,and(iii)must have all service utilities be water-tight or elevated to must be elevated on fill in accordance to above the regulatory flood protection elevation 5.21 or dryfloodproofed in accordance with 5.43. (c) Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or meet or exceed the following criteria: (1)To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure,there must be a minimum of two"automatic"openings in the outside walls of the structure,with a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding;and (2)There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure.Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. 5.23 The cumulative placement of fill or similar material on a parcel must not exceed 1,000 cubic yards,unless the fill is specifically intended to elevate a structure in 5.23 is an optional provision.Treating large accordance with Section 5.21 of this ordinance,or if allowed as a conditional use volumes of fill as a conditional use allows communities to require an erosion control under Section 5.33 below. and emergency removal plan for uses such 5.24 The storage of any materials or equipment must be elevated on fill to the as sand and gravel mining or dredge spoil regulatory flood protection elevation. storage. 5.25 All service utilities,including ductwork,must be elevated or water-tight to prevent infiltration of floodwaters. 5.26 The storage or processing of materials that are,in time of flooding,flammable, explosive,or potentially injurious to human,animal,or plant life is prohibited. 5.27 All fill must be properly compacted and the slopes must be properly protected by the use of riprap,vegetative cover or other acceptable method. 5.28 All new principal structures must have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation,or must have a flood warning/emergency evacuation plan acceptable to the(Governing 5.28 is optional,but is mandatory for subdivisions,including manufactured home Body). parks and recreational vehicle 5.29 Accessory uses such as yards, railroad tracks,and parking lots may be at an parks/campgrounds.See also Section 7.13. elevation lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation.However,any facilities used by employees or the general public must be designed with a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area is inundated to a depth and velocity such that the depth(in feet)multiplied by the velocity(in feet per second)would exceed a product of four upon occurrence of the regional(1%chance)flood. 5.30 Interference with normal manufacturing/industrial plant operations must be minimized,especially along streams having protracted flood durations. In considering permit applications,due consideration must be given to the needs of industries with operations that require a floodplain location. 5.31 Manufactured homes and recreational vehicles must meet the standards of Section 9 of this ordinance. 5.3 Conditional Uses: The following uses and activities may be allowed as conditional uses, if allowed in the underlying zoning district(s)or any applicable overlay district,following 5.3.As with conditional uses in the the procedures in Section 10.4 of this ordinance. floodway,conditional uses in the flood fringe are optional-communities should 5.31 Any structure that is not elevated on fill or floodproofed in accordance with determine which of these uses are needed Sections 5.21 and 5.22 of this ordinance. and appropriate in their floodplain areas. 5.32 Storage of any material or equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation. 5.33 The cumulative placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill when the fill is not being used to elevate a structure in accordance with Section 5.21 of this ordinance. 5.34 (OPTIONAL)The use of methods to elevate structures above the regulatory flood protection elevation,including stilts,pilings,parallel walls,or above-grade, enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages,shall meet the 5.34.The DNR refers to these as standards in Section 5.46. "alternative elevation methods",meaning it is an alternative to fill.This is designated 5.4 Standards for Flood Fringe Conditional Uses: optional because they are burdensome to administer-typically requiring 5.41 The standards listed in Sections 5.24 through 5.30 apply to all conditional uses. nonconversion agreements and detailed monitoring and inspections.See 5.46. 5.42 Basements,as defined by Section 2.913 of this ordinance,are subject to the following: (a) Residential basement construction is not allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation. (b) Non-residential basements may be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation provided the basement is structurally dry floodproofed in accordance with Section 5.43 of this ordinance. 5.43 All areas of nonresidential structures,including basements,to be placed below the regulatory flood protection elevation must be floodproofed in accordance with the structurally dry floodproofing classifications in the State Building Code. Structurally dry floodproofing must meet the FP1 or FP2 floodproofing classification in the State Building Code,which requires making the structure watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. 5.44 The placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill or other similar material on a parcel(other than for the purpose of elevating a structure to the regulatory flood protection elevation) must comply with an approved 5.44.Optional provisions to be used if erosion/sedimentation control plan. placement of this amount of fill is regulated as a conditional use. (a)The plan must clearly specify methods to be used to stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum of the regional(1%chance)flood event. (b)The plan must be prepared and certified by a registered professional engineer or other qualified individual acceptable to the(Governing Body). (c) The plan may incorporate alternative procedures for removal of the material from the floodplain if adequate flood warning time exists. 5.45 Storage of materials and equipment below the regulatory flood protection elevation must comply with an approved emergency plan providing for removal of such materials within the time available after a flood warning. • 5.46 (OPTIONAL)Alternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be 5.46.Standard tied to the optional 5.34. utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor above the regulatory flood The DNR refers to these as"alternative protection elevation.The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered elevation methods",meaning it is an above-grade and not a structure's basement or lowest floor if: 1)the enclosed alternative to fill.This is designated optarea is above-grade on at least one side of the structure;2)it is designed to administl er —typically burdensome to administer—typically requiring internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials;and 3)it is used nonconversion agreements and detailed solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage.The above-noted monitoring and inspections. alternative elevation methods are subject to the following additional standards: (a) Design and Certification-The structure's design and as-built condition must be certified by a registered professional engineer as being in compliance with the general design standards of the State Building Code and,specifically,that all electrical, heating,ventilation,plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. (b)Specific Standards for Above-grade,Enclosed Areas-Above-grade,fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages must be designed to internally flood and the design plans must stipulate: (1)The minimum area of openings in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a floodproofing technique.There shall be a minimum of two openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade.The automatic openings shall have a minimum net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding unless a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that a smaller net area would suffice.The automatic openings may be equipped with screens,louvers,valves,or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters without any form of human intervention;and (2)That the enclosed area will be designed of flood resistant materials in accordance with the FP3 or FP4 classifications in the State Building Code and shall be used solely for building access,parking of vehicles or storage. SECTION 6.0 GENERAL FLOODPLAIN DISTRICT(GF) 6.1 Permitted Uses: 6.1.If the General Floodplain District(the A z6.11 The uses listed in Section 4.1 of this ordinance,Floodway District Permitted Uses, defined dfl000r the AF,AO or AHres zones withinth defined floodway)isnot present within the are permitted uses. community,delete the contents of this section and retitle it"Reserved for Future 6.12 All other uses are subject to the floodway/flood fringe evaluation criteria Use"(i.e.,in case a future annexation or specified in Section 6.2 below.Section 4.0 applies if the proposed use is map update would add an Azane)_ determined to be in the Floodway District.Section 5.0 applies if the proposed use is determined to be in the Flood Fringe District. 6.2 Procedures for Floodway and Flood Fringe Determinations: 6.2.State and federal rules establish standards for this determination but do not 6.21 Upon receipt of an application for a permit or other approval within the General specifya procedure to be followed. Floodplain District,the Zoning Administrator must obtain,review and reasonably (However,the community is required under 44 CFR 60.3(b)(4)to"obtain,review and utilize any regional flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal, reasonably utilize"base flood elevation and state,or other source. floodway data.)The procedure shown here is one that DNR suggests that communities 6.22 If regional flood elevation and floodway data are not readily available,the follow. DNR Floodplain Program staff can applicant must furnish additional information,as needed,to determine the assist communities in obtaining relevant regulatory flood protection elevation and whether the proposed use would fall data and completing the determination. within the Floodway or Flood Fringe District.Information must be consistent with accepted hydrological and hydraulic engineering standards and the standards in 6.23 below. 6.23 The determination of floodway and flood fringe must include the following components,as applicable: (a) Estimate the peak discharge of the regional(1%chance)flood. (b) Calculate the water surface profile of the regional flood based upon a hydraulic analysis of the stream channel and overbank areas. (c) Compute the floodway necessary to convey or store the regional flood without increasing flood stages more than one-half(0.5)foot.A lesser stage increase than 0.5 foot is required if,as a result of the stage increase, increased flood damages would result. An equal degree of encroachment on both sides of the stream within the reach must be assumed in computing floodway boundaries. 6.24 The Zoning Administrator will review the submitted information and assess the 6.24.Federal rules require that technical evaluation and the recommended Floodway and/or Flood Fringe communities assess the cumulative effects District boundary.The assessment must include the cumulative effects of of floodway encroachments on both sides previous floodway encroachments.The Zoning Administrator may seek technical of ostream. Contact Floodplain Program staff for assistance in making this assistance from a designated engineer or other expert person or agency, assessment. including the Department of Natural Resources.Based on this assessment,the Zoning Administrator may approve or deny the application. 6.25 Once the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries have been determined, the Zoning Administrator must process the permit application consistent with the applicable provisions of Section 4.0 and 5.0 of this ordinance. SECTION 7.0 LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.1 In General: Recognizing that flood prone areas may exist outside of the designated 7.1 is optional—this and related provisions floodplain districts,the requirements of this section apply to all land within(community). in 7.25 and 7.3 are designed to enable communities to manage flood risks in 7.2 Subdivisions: No land may be subdivided which is unsuitable for reasons of flooding or unmapped but flood-prone areas(i.e., inadequate drainage,water supply or sewage treatment facilities.Manufactured home wetlands,ditches,isolated basins). If these parks and recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds are considered subdivisions under standards are not needed,Section 7can be retitled Subdivisions." this ordinance. 7.21 All lots within the floodplain districts must be able to contain a building site 7.21-7.24 is mandatory.These provisions can be integrated into a city or county outside of the Floodway District at or above the regulatory flood protection subdivision ordinance,where one exists. elevation. Note that manufactured home and recreational vehicle parks are treated as 7.22 All subdivisions must have road access both to the subdivision and to the subdivisions. individual building sites no lower than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation,unless a flood warning emergency plan for the safe evacuation of all vehicles and people during the regional(1%chance)flood has been approved by the(Governing Body).The plan must be prepared by a registered engineer or other qualified individual,and must demonstrate that adequate time and personnel exist to carry out the evacuation. 7.23 For all subdivisions in the floodplain,the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries,the regulatory flood protection elevation and the required elevation of all access roads must be clearly labeled on all required subdivision drawings and platting documents. 7.24 In the General Floodplain District,applicants must provide the information required in Section 6.2 of,this ordinance to determine the regional flood elevation,the Floodway and Flood Fringe District boundaries and the regulatory flood protection elevation for the subdivision site. • 7.25 If a subdivision proposal or other proposed new development is in a flood prone 7.25 is optional,to be used in conjunction area,any such proposal must be reviewed to assure that: with 7.1. (a) All such proposals are consistent with the need to minimize flood damage within the flood prone area, (b) All public utilities and facilities,such as sewer,gas,electrical,and water systems are located and constructed to minimize or eliminate flood damage, and (c) Adequate drainage is provided to reduce exposure of flood hazard. 7.3 Building Sites. If a proposed building site is in a flood prone area,all new construction 7.3 is optional,to be used in conjunction and substantial improvements(including the placement of manufactured homes)must with 7.1. be: (a) Designed(or modified)and adequately anchored to prevent floatation, collapse,or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads,including the effects of buoyancy; (b) Constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage; (c) Constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage;and (d) Constructed with electrical,heating,ventilation,plumbing,and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. SECTION 8.0 PUBLIC UTILITIES,RAILROADS,ROADS,AND BRIDGES 8.1 Public Utilities: All public utilities and facilities such as gas,electrical,sewer,and water supply systems to be located in the floodplain must be floodproofed in accordance with the State Building Code or elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation. 8.2 Public Transportation Facilities: Railroad tracks,roads,and bridges to be located within the floodplain must comply with Sections 4.0 and 5.0 of this ordinance.These transportation facilities must be elevated to the regulatory flood protection elevation where failure or interruption of these facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area.Minor or auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. 8.3 On-site Water Supply and Sewage Treatment Systems: Where public utilities are not 8.3.MPGA oversees the Rules regulating provided:1)On-site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate septic systems(7080.2270)and wells infiltration of flood waters into the systems and are subject to the provisions in (4725.4350),which regulate location and design in relation to floodplains. Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725.4350,as amended;and 2) New or replacement on-site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters,they must not be subject to impairment or contamination during times of flooding,and are subject to the provisions in Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.2270,as amended. SECTION 9.0 MANUFACTURED HOMES,MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS,AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. 9.1 Manufactured Homes: New manufactured home parks and expansions to existing 9.1.This subsection is mandatory;;the manufactured home parks are prohibited in any floodplain district.For existing remainder of Section 9.0 is optional but manufactured home parks or lots of record,the following requirements apply: recommended if manufactured home parks are located in any floodplain districts. 9.11 Placement or replacement of manufactured home units is prohibited in the Floodway District. 9.12 If allowed in the Flood Fringe District, placement or replacement of manufactured home units is subject to the requirements of Section 5 of this ordinance and the following standards. (a) New and replacement manufactured homes must be elevated in compliance with Section 5 of this ordinance and must be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation,collapse and lateral movement.Methods of anchoring may include,but are not limited to, use of over-the-top or frame ties to ground anchors.This requirement is in addition to applicable state or local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. (b)New or replacement manufactured homes in existing manufactured home parks must meet the vehicular access requirements for subdivisions in Section 7.22. 9.2 Recreational Vehicles: New recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds and expansions 9.2 has recently been revised to recognize to existing recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds are prohibited in any floodplain MN Department of Health rules(Section 4630.0200),which prohibit mobile home district. Placement of recreational vehicles in existing recreational vehicle parks or parks and recreational camping areas in campgrounds in the floodplain must meet the exemption criteria below or be treated as flood-prone areas.Placement or new structures meeting the requirements of this ordinance. replacement of manufactured home units may be allowed in existing manufactured home parks or on lots of record. 9.21 Recreational vehicles are exempt from the provisions of this ordinance if they are 9.21—9.23.These exemption criteria are placed in any of the following areas and meet the criteria listed in Section 9.22: required if recreational vehicles are allowed within any floodplain district. If this section (a) Individual lots or parcels of record. is not used,recreational vehicle placement (b) Existing commercial recreational vehicle parks or campgrounds. must be explicitly prohibited in floodplain districts. (c) Existing condominium-type associations. 9.22 Criteria for Exempt Recreational Vehicles: (a) The vehicle must have a current license required for highway use. (b) The vehicle must be highway ready, meaning on wheels or the internal jacking system,attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities commonly used in campgrounds and recreational vehicle parks. (c) No permanent structural type additions may be attached to the vehicle. (d) The vehicle and associated use must be permissible in any pre-existing, underlying zoning district. (e)Accessory structures are not permitted within the Floodway District.Any 9.22(e)is optional.Recreational vehicles in accessory structure in the Flood Fringe District must be constructed of flood- existing campgrounds may be allowed within the Floodway District,if defined as a resistant materials and be securely anchored,meeting the requirements permitted or conditional use,but we applicable to manufactured homes in Section 9.22. recommend they be treated as a temporary use,without accessory structures and with (f) An accessory structure must constitute a minimal investment an emergency plan in place. 9.23 Recreational vehicles that are exempt in Section 9.22 lose this exemption when 9.22(f)and 9.23 are optional. development occurs on the site that exceeds a minimal investment for an Communities may apply a monetary limit accessory structure such as a garage or storage building.The recreational vehicle such as$500 as a threshold fora"minimal and all accessory structures will then be treated as new structures subject to the investment,"recognizing that this threshold will vary from place to place. elevation and floodproofing requirements of Section 5.0 of this ordinance.No development or improvement on the parcel or attachment to the recreational vehicle is allowed that would hinder the removal of the vehicle should flooding occur. SECTION 10.0 ADMINISTRATION 10.0.Many of the standards and procedures in this section are likely to exist in other parts of the community's zoning 10.1 Zoning Administrator: A Zoning Administrator or other official designated by the ordinance,and maybe cross-referenced (Governing Body) must administer and enforce this ordinance. rather than repeated here. However,the community must be able to demonstrate 10.2 Permit Requirements: that these procedures or comparable ones are in place. 10.21 Permit Required. A permit must be obtained from the Zoning Administrator prior to conducting the following activities: The term"Zoning Administrator"is used throughout this section for ease of (a)The erection,addition,modification,rehabilitation,or alteration of any reference,but in some communities the building,structure,or portion thereof.Normal maintenance and repair also City Clerk or other official may fill this role. requires a permit if such work,separately or in conjunction with other planned work,constitutes a substantial improvement as defined in this ordinance. (b)The use or change of use of a building,structure,or land. (c) The construction of a dam,fence,or on-site septic system,although a permit 10.21(c).The exemption for farm fences in is not required fora farm fence as defined in this ordinance. (c)is optional. (d)The change or extension of a nonconforming use. (e)The repair of a structure that has been damaged by flood,fire,tornado,or any other source. (f) The placement of fill,excavation of materials,or the storage of materials or equipment within the floodplain. (g) Relocation or alteration of a watercourse(including new or replacement 10.21(g).Any change in the course,current culverts and bridges),unless a public waters work permit has been applied or cross-section of public waters requires o public waters work permit from the DNR for. under MN Stat.103G.245. (h)Any other type of"development"as defined in this ordinance. 10.22 Application for Permit. Permit applications must be submitted to the Zoning 10.22.This section may cross-reference any Administrator on forms provided by the Zoning Administrator.The permit other permitting requirements in the zoning application must include the following as applicable: ordinance. (a)A site plan showing all pertinent dimensions,existing or proposed buildings, structures,and significant natural features having an influence on the permit. (b)Location of fill or storage of materials in relation to the stream channel. (c) Copies of any required municipal,county,state or federal permits or approvals. (d)Other relevant information requested by the Zoning Administrator as necessary to properly evaluate the permit application. 10.23 Certificate of Zoning Compliance for a New,Altered,or Nonconforming Use. No building, land or structure may be occupied or used in any manner until a certificate of zoning compliance has been issued by the Zoning Administrator stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this ordinance. 10.24 Certification. The applicant is required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect,or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. Floodproofing measures must be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. 10.25 Record of First Floor Elevation.The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest floor(including basement)of all new structures and alterations or additions to existing structures in the floodplain.The Zoning Administrator must also maintain a record of the elevation to which structures and alterations or additions to structures are floodproofed. 10.26 Notifications for Watercourse Alterations.Before authorizing any alteration or relocation of a river or stream,the Zoning Administrator must notify adjacent communities. If the applicant has applied for a permit to work in public waters pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Section 103G.245,this will suffice as adequate notice. A copy of the notification must also be submitted to the Chicago Regional Office of the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). 10.27 Notification to FEMA When Physical Changes Increase or Decrease Base Flood Elevations. As soon as is practicable, but not later than six months after the date such supporting information becomes available,the Zoning Administrator must notify the Chicago Regional Office of FEMA of the changes by submitting a copy of the relevant technical or scientific data. 10.3 Variances: 10.31 should cross-reference all sections of 10.31 Variance Applications. An application for a variance to the provisions of this the zoning ordinance that regulate ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with applicable state processing and review of variance applications.10.3 only contains DNR/FEMA statutes and Section(s) of the zoning ordinance/code. —mandated regulatory&notification 10.32 Adherence to State Floodplain Management Standards. A variance must not provisions. allow a use that is not allowed in that district,permit a lower degree of flood Communities that administer zoning protection than the regulatory flood protection elevation for the particular area, ordinances(including floodplain or permit standards lower than those required by state law. ordinances)must establish a board of adjustment to hear appeals and variance 10.33 Additional Variance Criteria.The following additional variance criteria of the requests.In many communities,the city Federal Emergency Management Agency must be satisfied: council,county board,or planning commission serves as the board of (a) Variances must not be issued by a community within any designated adjustment.If a community does not have regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood existing variance procedures ora board of adjustment,contact Floodplain Program discharge would result. staff for sample ordinance language. (b) Variances may only be issued by a community upon(i)a showing of good and 10.33(a-c)is language required by FEMA sufficient cause,(ii)a determination that failure to grant the variance would and must be adopted verbatim.Note result in exceptional hardship to the applicant,and(iii)a determination that specifically that the reference to the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights,additional `exceptional hardship"in(b)(ii)must remain threats to public safety,extraordinary public expense,create nuisances,cause been rin the ordinance,even though it has eplaced by the term"practical fraud on or victimization of the public,or conflict with existing local laws or difficulties"in state zoning enabling ordinances. statutes. (c) Variances may only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary,considering the flood hazard,to afford relief. 10.34 Flood Insurance Notice. The Zoning Administrator must notify the applicant for a 10.34 is required by FEMA. variance that: 1)The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as$25 for$100 of insurance coverage;and 2)Such construction below the base or regional flood level increases risks to life and property. Such notification must be maintained with a record of all variance actions. 10.35 General Considerations. The community may consider the following factors in Section 10.35 is optional but recommended granting variances and imposing conditions on variances and conditional uses in as guidance for communities in reviewing variance applications.The same factors are flood pla i n s: recommended for review of conditional use (a)The potential danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or applications,below. velocities caused by encroachments; (b)The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others; (c) The proposed water supply and sanitation systems,if any,and the ability of these systems to minimize the potential for disease,contamination and unsanitary conditions; (d)The susceptibility of any proposed use and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner; (e)The importance of the services to be provided by the proposed use to the community; (f) The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location; (g)The availability of viable alternative locations for the proposed use that are not subject to flooding; (h)The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future; (i) The relationship of the proposed use to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and flood plain management program for the area; (j) The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles; (k) The expected heights,velocity,duration,rate of rise and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. 10.36 Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources(DNR). The(designated body/community official)must submit hearing notices for proposed variances to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days'notice of the hearing. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 10.37 Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR. A copy of all decisions granting variances must be forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S.Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 10.38 Record-Keeping.The Zoning Administrator must maintain a record of all variance actions,including justification for their issuance,and must report such variances in an annual or biennial report to the Administrator of the National Flood Insurance Program,when requested by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 10.4 Conditional Uses: 10.41 Administrative Review.An application fora conditional use permit under the 10.41 should cross-reference any conditional use procedures in the zoning provisions of this ordinance will be processed and reviewed in accordance with ordinance,if these exist.If not,contact Section(s) of the zoning ordinance/code. Floodplain Program staff for administrative language. 10.42 Factors Used in Decision-Making. In passing upon conditional use applications, Section 10.42 is optional but recommended the(Governing Body)must consider all relevant factors specified in other as guidance for decisions on conditional uses(and variances,as noted above). sections of this ordinance,and those factors identified in Section 10.35 of this ordinance. 10.43 Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits.The(Governing Body)may 10.43 is also optional;conditions are attach such conditions to the granting of conditional use permits as it deems intended to be specific to the particular site necessary to fulfill the purposes of this ordinance.Such conditions may include, and proposed use. but are not limited to,the following: (a) Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. (b) Limitations on period of use,occupancy,and operation. (c) Imposition of operational controls,sureties,and deed restrictions. (d) Requirements for construction of channel modifications,compensatory storage,dikes,levees,and other protective measures. (e) Floodproofing measures,in accordance with the State Building Code and this ordinance.The applicant must submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing measures are consistent with the regulatory flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. 10.44 Submittal of Hearing Notices to the Department of Natural Resources(DNR).The (designated body/community official)must submit hearing notices for proposed conditional uses to the DNR sufficiently in advance to provide at least ten days' notice of the hearing.The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S. Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. 10.45 Submittal of Final Decisions to the DNR.A copy of all decisions granting conditional uses must be forwarded to the DNR within ten days of such action. The notice may be sent by electronic mail or U.S.Mail to the respective DNR area hydrologist. SECTION 11.0 NONCONFORMITIES 11.1 Continuance of Nonconformities:A use,structure,or occupancy of land which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this ordinance but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this ordinance may be continued subject to the following conditions.Historic structures,as defined in Section 2.941(b)of this ordinance,are subject to the provisions of Sections 11.11-11.16 of this ordinance. 11.11.Buildings and structures within the 11.11 A nonconforming use,structure,or occupancy must not be expanded,changed, Floodway District may not be enlarged or enlarged,or altered in a way that increases its flood damage potential or degree expanded.In some cases,a floodway area of obstruction to flood flows except as provided in 11.12 below.Expansion or can be filled without causing any rise in enlargement of uses,structures or occupancies within the Floodway District is flood stage.In such cases,a Letter of Map rah ibited. Revision may be obtained that changes the p floodway boundary,placing the area in the 11.12 Any addition or structural alteration to a nonconforming structure or Flood Fringe.Contact Floodplain Program staff for details. nonconforming use that would result in increasing its flood damage potential must be protected to the regulatory flood protection elevation in accordance with any of the elevation on fill or floodproofing techniques(i.e.,FP1 thru FP4 floodproofing classifications)allowable in the State Building Code,except as further restricted in 11.13 and 11.17 below. 11.13.The language presented is 11.13 If the cost of all previous and proposed alterations and additions exceeds 50 recommended,in order to gradually percent of the market value of any nonconforming structure,that shall be eliminate nonconformities over time. considered substantial improvement,and the entire structure must meet the Federal standards require that substantial standards of Section 4.0 or 5.0 of this ordinance for new structures,depending improvement,is tracked overa one-year upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District, period. respectively.The cost of all structural alterations and additions must include all costs such as construction materials and a reasonable cost placed on all manpower or labor. 11.14 If any nonconforming use,or any use of a nonconforming structure,is Section 11.14 reflects an optional provision discontinued for more than one year,any future use of the premises must in statute(462.357(Subd 1e)(1)and 394.36) —local government may impose reasonable conform to this ordinance.The Assessor must notify the Zoning Administrator in conditions on the nonconforming use or writing of instances of nonconformities that have been discontinued for a period structure.Many communities have adopted of more than one year. similar provisions in their zoning ordinances. 11.15 If any nonconformity is substantially damaged,as defined in Section 2.940 of this ordinance,it may not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions Section 11.ISisspecific to floodplain uses in state and federal statute,as distinct from of this ordinance.The applicable provisions for establishing new uses or new structures in Sections 4.0 or 5.0 will apply depending upon whether the use or the standard provisions for nonconformities structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe,respectively. in the Chapters 394 and 462. 11.16 If any nonconforming use or structure experiences a repetitive loss,as defined in Section 11.16 is optional but recommended, Section 2.936 of this ordinance,it must not be reconstructed except in in order to gradually eliminate nonconformities that are frequently conformity with the provisions of this ordinance. damaged but not to the"so%"level. 11.17 Any substantial improvement,as defined in Section 2.941 of this ordinance,to a 11.1715 a mandatory federal requirement. nonconforming structure requires that the existing structure and any additions Asdefined,"substantial improvement"is must meet the requirements of Section 4.0 or 5.0 of this ordinance for new monitored over a one-year period. structures,depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District. SECTION 12.0 PENALTIES AND ENFORCEMENT 12.1 Violation Constitutes a Misdemeanor:Violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with any of its requirements(including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) constitute a misdemeanor and will be punishable as defined by taw. 12.2 Other Lawful Action:Nothing in this ordinance restricts the(community)from taking such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation.If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the Zoning Administrator within the specified period of time,each additional day that lapses will constitute an additional violation of this ordinance and will be prosecuted accordingly. 12.3 Enforcement:Violations of the provisions of this ordinance will be investigated and 12.3.Cross-reference any sections of the resolved in accordance with the provisions of Section(s) of the zoning ordinance that deal with enforcement procedures.If such provisions zoning ordinance/code.In responding to a suspected ordinance violation,the Zoning don't exist,contact Floodplain Program Administrator and (Governing Body)may utilize the full array of enforcement actions staff for sample language. available to it including but not limited to prosecution and fines,injunctions,after-the- fact permits,orders for corrective measures or a request to the National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood insurance availability to the guilty party.The(community) must act in good faith to enforce these official controls and to correct ordinance violations to the extent possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. SECTION 13.0 AMENDMENTS 13.1 Floodplain Designation—Restrictions on Removal:The floodplain designation on the Official Zoning Map must not be removed from floodplain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regulatory flood protection elevation and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain.Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)if the Commissioner determines that,through other measures,lands are adequately protected for the intended use. 13.2 Amendments Require DNR Approval:All amendments to this ordinance must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources(DNR)prior to adoption.The Commissioner must approve the amendment prior to community approval. 13.3 Map Revisions Require Ordinance Amendments.The floodplain district regulations must be amended to incorporate any revisions by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to the floodplain maps adopted in Section 2.3 of this ordinance. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval and publication,as required by law and/or charter. Adopted by the Board/City Council (Community Name) This of (Day) (Month) (Year) Attest: ,County Board Chairperson/Mayor (Name of Elected Official) Attest: ,County Administrator/City Clerk (Name of Community Official) Stamp With Community Seal: CITY OF EDINA MEMO City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 4,9Z��jl Fax 952-826-0389 •www.CityofEdina.com O vi •®�'y O Date: September 14, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review— 5109-5125 West 49th Street The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to redevelop three lots at 5109-5125 West 49th Street. (See property location on pages Al.) Opinions or comments provided to the applicant shall be considered advisory only, and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two apartments and single family home on the site and build two new 3-4 story condominiums with a total of 27 units. The applicant is proposing six units or 22% of the units for affordable housing. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A2—A22.) The property is 1.43 acres in size. The density proposed in the project would be 19 units per acre. This site was rezoned to PUD in 2013; however, the approved project for the site was never built. The site was approved for a 16 unit townhome development that had a density of 11 units per acre. To accommodate that request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment was granted to re-guide the site from LDAR, Low Density Attached Residential (1-4 units per acre), to MDR, Medium Density Residential, which allows up to 12 units per acre. (See approved plans on pages A23-A25.) This new request would require another Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re- guide the site to HD, High Density Residential. A High Density Residential designation would allow the site to be developed with over 12 units per acre. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the existing PUD would also be required. The table on the following page is a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the existing PUD Standards on the lot. Please note that several variances would be required under the existing zoning standards. City of Edina • 4801 W.506 St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Compliance Table �� )141 ° City Standard Proposed (PUD-5) Front—49th Street 35 feet—structure 22 feet* 18 feet—stair/deck/patio Front—Vernon 7 feet 15 feet Side - East 15 & 42 feet 19 feet & 19 feet* Side -West 15 feet 25 feet Building Height 2-1/2 stories or 3-4 stories & 52 feet* 35.5 feet Building Coverage 26% 31%* Density 11 units per acre (16 units) 19 units per acre**(27 units) Setback from R-1 District 120 feet 15 feet(east)* 132 feet (north) *Variances required under the current zoning ** Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required Highlights: • The project offers more green space than the previously approved plan, despite the increase in building square footage. ➢ The proposal for 6 affordable units. The previous plan contained no affordable housing. ➢ Underground parking. • Pedestrian Connections and the "Green Promenade." ririmminimmimmv, City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO e � � Staff Concerns: J• ➢ The site is adjacent to single-family residential homes to the north an. -..nt,,. that are guided LD, Low Density Residential. The proposed HD, High Density Residential designation is not consistent. We usually see a Medium Density designation adjacent to single-family homes. ➢ Building Height. The building is 16.5 feet taller than the approved project for the site. ➢ Traffic. A traffic study would need to be completed to determine impacts on adjacent roadways. Concern has been expressed with the previous request from residents in regard to congestion that would be created at the intersection of Brookside and Interlachen Boulevard. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • i City of Edina l.cgand ;. 4891 41sas6 Hamkar l9Lata 499( 52e4 bio! 51,11 Shecl!ietre 1.91'K'lz 4316 5527 str15113410�5t95146t9 3 :;(g f,� siy l;m?.�. Ja45 4GA1 1 1 4591 t 'J� CrC.A4 1 4143 - _..—_ 'y - A2 0 Lakx Hames _-_~_, 35.0 317b 5733?tot 5700 d3fl rbv 4._ lskea ''� 4a la • 32rT ?5451 181% 4!'!6 /:! ":OK 'ttlT....... © YafL�'t I ddPl t '— 4116 q 3 4125 7,95 �✓� 579} ^ %, • 4F?i 11I3 5121 3f17 3/t3 a°.51 A;.9 \ `.. ANtt6mltsai _. 1512 Cal g -_... / J 45:3 4!34 !1M 511Gl112 SIPS east 4' Jlld 4b)2 UN � I I ei:Q t StiS 29 5 b - .. .._. 6:1/137 IV 03) I '21 WO • N6( ! 4 ... t.195 i 2xS'P. 5105 1� 114,525 5111 ¢L LSIS j f907 ti 2/ip0._I <.ly 3180 4 i SMO g5 .,, lAY o �9 LZ ,sem yY b w p 3109 s Measalte • ar) J MN5675 + sots K o 24 I ...2i 5345 ,1 C r �) ;� r 3146 5141 41 3,15 $ j' r>:.eta s a-.34 !) Wt.asNnnALs•tAPessess EdiO.t —.._^--- ot__...��_. .,2>,b ..�...--- '; r 4-9..:.� PID:2811721310040 cY )rit..a\{ o e f .,�r���`1�0sy��� _... 5115�9t115t YV �t��' f i'?. ,�p �)'' 'a�, 1=11118,Ml i iaarA36 A I w+>�, ^). . Tiok. .4 Li { •• • Al • O The site has a significant slope down from Vernon Avenue to 49th St. West. O Approximately fifty single family homes comprise the neighborhood located north of the site which lies between 49th St. West and Minnehaha Creek. The oldest homes in this area date from the 1930's but most of the homes were built around 1951, and a few are newer. ® The site includes a 25' strip of land vacated by the city which lies between 5125 49th Street West and the Soo Line right-of-way. The market for new homes at this location— o Is primarily driven by empty nesters selling larger homes in the Edina area, who want to remain in the community. o They prefer to down-size and enjoy community maintenance done by professional management. o They prefer floor plans with all basic functions on one level. o They expect a heated, secure garage facility. o They are active seniors who prefer not to be in a designated 'over 55' community. O There is a secondary market of younger couples and individuals who like the same fundamental amenities as empty nesters. The proposed redevelopment as 27-unit condominium homes has a similar FAR to the current townhouse plan, but in its form and residential demographics would be very different from the existing PUD: o The current PUD has 43,567 SF of heated living space. The new plan will have about 44,000 SF of heated living space. The current PUD has an average size home of 2,723 SF and the new plan will average about 1,630 SF per home. ® The current PUD has a high degree of site coverage and almost no useable open green space. Two exhibits to this memorandum illustrate the contrast in useable open space between the current PUD and the new plan. In the new plan site coverage is only 31.6% of the land area (about 19,686 SF), with landscape representing the balance of the site, which is almost one acre. The new site development concept is an elegant pair of buildings approximately 96' apart with a large landscaped courtyard between the two buildings. 2 • The new plan includes a path from 49th Street to Vernon Avenue which will provide a pleasant walk through the center of the site for access to the Grandview commercial district south of this location and integrate the condominium community with the neighborhood. The current PUD has a walking path by the railroad that seems to end at a traffic barrier on Vernon Avenue. • The traffic generated by 27 condominium homes will be no greater than the traffic from 16 townhomes occupied by active families. • The current PUD has no affordable housing. With reference to the City's November 2015 guidelines for inclusionary housing, the new plan will provide six units (22.2%) in the `affordable' class listed as two-bedroom homes with a 2015 price of about $300,000. Other key features of the proposed new development include: • Two buildings which are very similar, one with 13 units and one with 14 units. Both buildings have the same garage footprint of about 8,600 SF as shown on the Site Plan. • The parking garage will provide two parking spaces for each conventional unit and one parking space for each of the affordable homes, together with storage space for the homeowners. • The architectural style of the buildings is intended to reflect classic Nordic features such as sloped roofs, covered decks and a heated garage. • The basic form of the buildings is three housing levels above the parking garage with a partial fourth level providing a loft area for homes on level three. • Along 49th Street West the site plan provides for 11 guest parking spaces, which includes two full size truck parking areas for service. • With limited site coverage, it will be possible to preserve in the new development many large trees currently on site. The railroad tracks to the west of this site would continue to be buffered by a heavily wooded area. In order to accomplish the goal of having at least 20% of the new homes moderately priced (less than half the price of conventional homes), the project will require modest financial assistance from the city, which has been discussed with Mr. Teague and Mr. Neuendorf. We have consulted with local realtors who advise us that the affordable units should not materially detract from marketing 3 ' 1 } the conventional units. We currently estimate the net project cost of including six affordable homes (22% of the total) to be about $550,000. We also request that the developer and city engage in a discussion regarding the potential of making the walkway through the site a public amenity and finding a mutually beneficial arrangement to support that function. The proposed revision to the existing PUD, we believe, incorporates the site better into the neighborhood and ties the neighborhood better into the fabric of the community. The condominium homes will bring more seniors into the neighborhood. The affordable homes within the new project will maintain demographic diversity within the condominium community. The project's 'promenade' from 49th Street up to Vernon Avenue will connect the project to the neighbors and connect this neighborhood with the Grandview commercial district. We look forward to discussion of our redevelopment plan with the Planning Commission. If the commissioners are favorably disposed to the new project, this site will need to be reclassified in the city's Comprehensive Plan from mid-density housing to high-density housing in order to facilitate the 27-units of new housing. Best regards, fr/eL. N. Edward Briesemeister, CRE neb@greatoaks.us,corn 404 789 4447 -7; Wt 1S* CC: Brad Schafer Robert Kimmel Gerald O'Brien Maureen Michalski Amanda Janzen Tom Threlkeld Tom Dillon 4 „..., Mr. Cary Teague, Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Sketch Plan Review of proposal to amend the current PUD zoning for properties owned by Gerald O'Brien (5109 and 5117 49th Street West) and Robert . Kimmel (5125 49th Street West)together with a small tract currently owned by the City of Edina adjacent to 5125 49th St. West. Total land area is approximately 62,387 SF. C2 ry, • I acknowledge and consent to this Sketch Plan application. 2(4 Robert Kimmel Date • rkimmel@k2ins.com • 415 225 7475 Li ” je.41.21A1 • I 7- V Gerald O'Brien date 2625 Valley Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 612 889 1153 • __„_ - --- _ —..--- 0.------------T:s j 0,---, it,__ ___ _ 49TH STREET W g , I _ ./1----_,.4. ..-,-A-, --,....1 0 , I .1 11 1,11n1 I ff& 1 , 0 .. /11111 1 1 1 - I • ii7=4 lininirialM) i-- .:- - i'.1/32" 1 ---j azzlEmnanssingssurt7 eistit, --2-...- , ... 8.---- • ' .4' leml...... 4 w. ,7"-: ::'._..... ....,,a,...eil.•• . -Zt.o. . ... ._. . 5.IFk•Inrfiltj . .i'l ,•9,A-,•: 0/ Imilltill L,,,,-,W.-:•—' .11041141r ( le Ir4Iffe-lilkillia‘roelti—ill- I, `2 1..M .is MS• • U,, aim,' ,,,,). • -NW 1r (I) ..,,viv Iktral..,.1.E...,iMiks • '00915, 7•Hinii' s_.. .",,Itri liwa_ (2)---Olt "1,'-,",. : : _.... _ 1•4; r- -r- C:00 Ile WNW_ ••i"--,-- _ 1.,.. ; , 1 , 0• ,...:. 0 -.-- T \-_•./...., • . ' • ' '1 , n.,w• 1 .---.:_-_-:=_J, III 0.0.,,, i ,F ..,-.:71 • Az ..., _ AO , goy IF i -.1 , „,lit, .!"!". ' '''' ' INI 5105 51.31 2 — I' W)--11-111r - ' " 1i Lio ,, r ; ..,,- ;, 1,__./i; ifito - Er' 1 „ ,-,.....:). 1 ,o.. . _ _ . g. -- ,, ,, • ,i'• 1, illi ko..14 11 1 f,t1 , tsilt 1 ell il . ! 1, ,, Hal _A. ,, 0 , „ , ,• ,, „,,, _,,._ _-,--C---1-.- •. ••• ;.. IkIL5551 ...— .- ..--4NEW , Vi• -_LA _.1., ,.......-- .. ----- „....,r, kva\ ....... ,,, ..,-, ..z @ - 1 , • . __ ,. tu,,>_. . 1 0,--- ..,,: - ,.u,.. I 1 I -,-, ...-,-;------,• ,, 1.- xc-,, 11 $7 i l' e•• • I c4 -- el: 14,, _...Au -0 •,--, S5',,•%''' 11,, , 11 r II 5V I II 1 ti.:I z —T „ 0_;,, 4, ..._.../ 0 144.0..4,,i $ °Ai $: $ I Et.) -1 "" nivil .....--.,,;-• air $ I, $ $, $ 1 iii '' tut$__$ _ . i 1--I i_-1, -, ; -± k!, ...,/"- 4g „„ , i f 55. 4111:4 1%111 - :.A.....= ,51,0IY.2 rq I' 1 E , • , -- $!:$1.Y 1 1 1-01 I ais•i (-')--\'n __ , /(D' = /, _ gaL. , • , v _ 10 flepla....t.,..... _,7„.Tigre ,,.•I/ -- WL. 11 11 ; I 'f , . " .6, „ ,. , i',,:i 0 ,, _, t ,, __ 0.- ‘ - , 0 NieuraT, ,. -, ,,,,,,?:, T„..inkir.,,t104,41 .-...,..., , .- , 11 0.r s , t 1 '14•7•••••,••••4•11=r• _•• • 4k•.,,,. I of..6 • 0 4' " . , "P• ,,,,,;--' ' It; 20 ! A . . a, „,...- „, I- _. 1.'71in- . '..*.- f''-----. ', () -25:;:_..-\ '-', I:...- I. , , ! 1416_,w °''''. -'-'2°1--.'"'''' . C.>_) •••,- ' 0 ' n $ 7 Mr, „,..., 7-- tILLILIVrk,..!4=1; 4'-'-4 ".'10"HI:' '1`4.---7"vi. c-, :.,, '° n----r' ‘-...-,----- - •--r__...----------.-- t-2 0---Ni_. .. , 1-15-414)4, n 00a0-_------ ------_,- ,,y , tFs. i ;' ' ,_ , „ycs--P_. - ....---- T ,--;' VE01°141.1s I - -,,,„ ,....... --'___/"_-,-- ,----__..-- -I- Aktro,04- , oou,00 - -__ _____ ,.._ TT- . , -,,,,_.._ ...- ,..._, i--\. 16-unit townhome site plan PUD approved 2013 03 _11 ii 49TH STREET W (0.0 i T7'=1132" I 1 -..-+ ! i":„:-- 4 r ., 1 1. i i ca T_ L_. _ I i I. I - C ; I i 4_..I d t I i EAST BUILDING iat�tEi�PROMENADE I 4 I 1 WEST BUILDINGS j •1 i 4-4 u, I i g 1 I. i I it L.r.f. 1 , I111 i 4 1 I � j 16 i I- Z 1 4 1': r a I I / J j 1 , z - I } a j 1 3 I w z I I j: ,. --I-I r z 1. .._ L -' o r _: I [ • .. l 1 F _- „k r I _.T I T _- I a-t (, I t j -' I aFP 4\14:4..,S T i. i. NAP ! BROOKSIDE CONDOMINIUMS, Edina, MN GREEN/PEDESTRIAN OPEN AREAS-BROOKSIDE CONDOMINIUMS 04 0.20,22122026 01/, BROOKSIDE CONDOMINIUM EDINA, MINNESOTA NAP . iCh. ‘:'' ,.• j,‘,.;,, -,--,",1044 , ,N. swit 44t, 4,..,_ i Nt -, '1''' ' - S# 'IC' K ti ,t" , ,..; to ., , . , reipy .''''' .,,._1. , 4. ':- .1 .,. 3AV VI 3 if 1%- IRF -,4..„---- 1 4—11-1172. vv ,,p..1,t 1 111 f ,muasnt, t .11 ; •7.V4, .,ter l 1wy,-" Y '• . v `c+,s "� area win-pue pp ref �• 3A'd3015K00a9 ~,.� �a i � �IIRl1l:A ''' r' totet W �~ p ` 1� :i + �' it tom. , • .a... - � , ' OAT'r - s ;-} f { Fi i• t. A } . � ' ' 000 . Itt jw _' Z r., A x - II °1'. .rt F-,,,,...,,•''3,„410, `- a t f sift` { " W i6 4j>. y,. ' d L b 2 , of ` 4,s ' '- `. 4 41 i 2 o iat 'C't ''''P -,40k - t' ' ' '-' -110 4 l' ' 7 '** '''-.4. ' Ca i •' 0� � ofd+ , Am } .-----' ` TREES LEYERO �, _"---Ti----- 1 27Y-Ce �a \ +) Tv 49TH STREET �> 00� q3 m E? 7 =? if a ati9 sus. arm ,....��eQ• �� - -"— — a /N FL',(l..LE T1p01014 r-- TW49X �Tq EXISTING PAXtoNI$cn A*CWIrccra I PEanM1H I( , ,W4.013.71, zP .� frpI 9 GTRUC$S =r`� WOODED AREA SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA *"§2aF 9236•I9 939• � eao ARCHITECTURE �''3 �. I - • �y (991 I t' ��-i- URBAN DESIGN — I � _� y `__��'' J 0 INTERIOR DESIGN - 1 HISTOR HISTORIC REHABILITATION 02 i �,2�I --,_�� "..- -k ,y''^,•� 93 AP.; .-��✓ 9-3--':-----:-: J ,_„ __._.._. EXISTING t61CONSTRUCTION,CIVI MANAGEMENT :'..,,,7 �� 1 E DECIDUOUS TREE ^'^•°� 934 93'4 • _rLi . .......-.— .. TIMING I 1 WAR PUCE,e� I T81'7- ,1 93g116p+ /E�" v y 927 I �� n..sml s,n me, sax .Ea CA s« —ti- / • m 6540 s•,a ti' I sw OAT r.. 934 C t, l I I I ®�® �� I I • 1 _ _ �I I EXISTING �nen;:.a, _1 Ti - I - H I I (' > ' 9$ {I CONIFEROUS TREE neopynsnczwaolna _ I 4;1.41 �� PROM MADE 93e _ - - 1! _ - - .K-�e. �VE•T IUILD�G ' 937 'Ir-�� 1 TREESTOBEREMDVE _ r --ea0 — + oven BROOKSIDE I 9�sI _, UILDu � CONDOMINIUM I ( , • , 0 IUM s.� 1 11 ! b I ,. ...._ ...., , : e,�I. lit_.-- --4-=iiit. . •_.,,l"r�--- 1 -I 935 !.:G� --a.,,,..„-,2,- ,IrI —.. - . PROPOSED TREES ` .::..:N An I I I : I d " Mae I 9341 .. _._+. .. 'r---I" I I � I r I� Ti — _ f 4 #-- _ mcanoN '• .__-- , Rkr-—9 _— - I "' 5109/5117/5125 49th Street west r • i 6T-O I 30•Pr - 5.!r ,,q I( _..I . _.e_.__.. �,I 1. `.I - J 997 1..__.� Edina.MN y{ /�J• -iv I F _ `, • ! t + 9.t�3•r ! I Y- vT PROJECT PHASE J98110. ry oJO I ',, -__ ,�-I_ -I l - __- 1.1.,'.7'' ,i� �'ukg�7 ._, _ I .L� _ / -4. a• I __ — I , 1 '93 ',. . ea I• �. SITE PLAN i = I gaz 1 ,1 -- I, i , i — j. I 74}0" .� 498 , + GARAGE LEVEL __ u gaa ....L,. / / ! I 937 �,a•`., oaa I A�j!- 1 j ao4 1! 'i .: I v 'Fcr r� , 7 _ _ i 1 DATE — * I 93ll FJ01 , 31,,.._,,� .A _ , .Bag_ I 1 ELin k • �4'' Li I• iy 37 7›.' SCALE '"_ gas ' r...1 ! _ '! 1, 941 �iJ j..64„-,,,- :i L 'rr�`� YY,.i gJs �,-, 1/32'_1 0" AUGUST 24 2016 9 REVISIMN6 P _. .-'5,!-;,',m,_ ,.',t ..`'.4,04447,./,';'' ` -'''~ - sa.1 J -eq�: _1 1O0 _ / ,938 ✓ f.1r"' 'Ti _- --- y� //,yam' li - 1- I naMl . i ,I. �� ,-. :: els t ��05� ,------'---!_____---1- -- _ I_._ - % r • I s Ws. �" .._ - i ' i/ Ja1 + •;� -.;-:•:.•-‘-:_-•:;;-.4..,:;---:_----__;,----- I - I - — 14--);'4',F.-4--4-;4•••=7.--:::. f• � —�,rr I _ I t r t i ,'/;;"481.•.;- I t . - M�g; y " , pVE ....... i 1 : �a' i VERSO -y—� r[ s _ _y- -- ------ A111 .1 �� -- I — — 9 .„.----_-_,---_-_..--/:- . ..v --------- —.------- - .:-,..,,,v2;„.--.. _ — �1 1 immimmmlin N A P OA110111CO AIICIITICT1 1)1A1M111 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA 251-p.1--_,__ - ...__-62t0'.. 961-0". -._ 6 0' 30.p.+ 67-0... ._..__.._-..__. ARCHITECTURE -I �. PLANNING ""' t !it:::74....".::.;[,...—,„,.....7 - ti j HISTORIC TER REHABILITATION TCPOF ROOF �Y ,+ ii' .� .------ 1 I -0 -- CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ja 'P ce •..ut..ercb 41,11•1 } t 1.ra i a TOP OF ROOF' vrxw.mAP.eom 'f LOFT.... i� 'i.rE�^�.�....,_.� �,�VS; li•�iita a. ra 1 rime, �csai naesro Ii ....-fail ' R1 Ti-- �` '� INel s4 ...n �- awFiooR �.�.� tt — rt , 9 �A til 8 �_ Y - __t QvdwonAv DenIII �ew ryh�,aPlanners r3-0f7 FLOCXt ----3162--"'''''NG i .a•—i_ u — ...1.4=7.=.,-7,1_ ._-...- n Copyright 2009 DIAD - TsrFwoR--1 „,___=.--L-1--,._-- -._— -- .uFl — i f»Nara71........7_______,-- arr�� �— + 1t a tR =. a --T 1 -��°OR SOOUME y ow, �19"1pE LEM. 33 _ IMI I!J1�(!t �J "'r _ TRACKS _-- BROOKSIDE ff 4$THSTEL!VAt1OIIMONTHELEyenor) CONDOMINIUM I LOCATION 5109/5117/512549th Street West Edina,MN PROJECT PHASE JOB HO. `.”) SECTIONS& ELEVATIONS ,-25,4:01------------621:0"y� -96 0_ _I___ 6zit -r___3a.p _ 6�p 49TH STREET ELEVATION �-9114_.. rs 5 't Y/' i� / a �'�... .'s, 4. I �. t �1 Mt n'JS" " 1 I t J� Iv I r�.�� SCALE DATE TOP OF ROOF y..h� t,,. ,r I t1 i'So+,. ,a / :11-:,k', (� i ?_ f 1/ / �f. ST C` tj i r-..�, {``s., 1"�pP ROOF 1/32',1._0^ AUGUST24,2016 ' , ..r�te $, ^a 'y J t tt <ut'.... -'�=1(.. - ! 1I' '--.iN-----} 4iii.UHg}}}rr'i L' ,Y' 4 `� YFI.:" ,S �.. ql �� ,:.si3 1x< r A •tL u.n'fitr i l�i7 .N� t5 _ ••m•-g - REVISIONS - OFT/' "7t r i t ....[�!PI 1 I fl{ ~ :r* -^°,, '°' r` I A• LOFT ..tried:-. �'. . , r .t r. any'{- - L�,F t° a tt' ! ' r '1•5„).:.------------;,1!..,i o P t On � � •Y^TJtiAOR `."✓_�-.�...�.",ti F!P. _ -J�s� � + } `/ d5t'"' �'-Y..... '._ -� . FIAOFt r`® n g _ _ tst t•_-.,L 4-.1kle:-.— #'"a, AYy 7Ha ie'� Edwin 1. - i1.._1_„__awn. 1-17.-E:ni • 1 aM T.L-. .+j .e 5 : aETFLAOR---I `� �..• ----._..-- /.. t._••"``�_ _ .ng r la:,z� -�I¢ ort ! 1 49TH ST ELEVATION(NMI ELEVATION) i�, (WITH EXISTING TREES) ii PA!IOnIC/I AIICHITOCif I P/ANNIB NAP SAN FRANCISCO SAY AREA �y0+_� ' I 96�dY �� �'�—'i ARCHITECTURE Nall I` PLANNING $ I EAl<f i 1 URBAN DESIGN INTERIOR DESIGN I I `• +� - S'' jTOP OF ROOF CONS REHABILITATION 1 fYI :i !ly Sr { CONSTRUCTION oI 402 TOP OF ROOF 1 �q j F -, .� ( �' AP.eom 1 �"?aV.* ty{tr4t BVII +fes d r j 971 Rn PLACE0.a nrEo a s O G ..- r •- ' 9 {ccutmirssl�Fluuattc� .4-971 LOFT .:I I m EnxMlssol 229 MO 9119— �'; .., 3 I.' -p (1�t4�E�'S+v gt4 n., T-•J' CM ' I 1 ,ao snx +LOFT I ' �I ,ma 1 g, 3"'! ,R., I 3R0 FLOOR !M lLOOit 4VC�t1011 AV n I^PI-I f'f7 Jl' n..,w I lej 19 I Qi -I I FLOOR g� oen Ione=c Pr 9 AzooeSowP ,p^. ..- i o d hr 811.3 -_. t'LOOR I SO I: I ,1ST FLOOR 8T FLOOR !300 UNE i _.... .....,.. t .. la 9T. _- �� t..;.- I- - -'-�- 04V111",T ; 1 vARAclettva BROOKSWE VERNON AVELEVATION 01011TH ELEVATION) CONDOMINIUM LOCA1101i 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West Edina,MN PROJECT RUSE /09 NO SECTIONS& ELEVATIONS I I xr,o„ ,Q• --gb.p� f,. -I 6.21-0' 23.0-1 VERNON AVE ELEVATION [711VtooF(P'‘G SCALE DATE A. 492 a o , s;40,..,' 4 " q�� �4 gP - 1 � 1/32"=1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 T TOP OF ROOF a 8x jf ir7T' /fi., �..-F.' / 4 'S +�"� 'f�A7 >h" _ t ,�-5 '�.rr �16.> , 777,7,::,...;;-,-, t . Cti 1 r� 6 Q a REVISIONS Lf 1 ;/ 4 a--., u , ' g "f./ Ir1 nT 09 f',, ,/..# I o of 57 �\o rFµ ,.,„4.k,-...„�vR ,.z�7. __!at,`I, �� �Vr� ; /k !% a!/l*aQ nu tiL �II 9/ .i ; ' i :. ORO FLOOR CIVENCf1AV 1 I _ -- F -'rte rrr.F'I'T--, .-'1"._ ( _!"' .hall _ I- 4N_ ,� a 3 ND FLOOR /// / : ,l / .z' //D/�/ //z/�� / 19T FLOOR ,I 1.11111111111.111 935 S�OIl1`: G 1 ". /-, i/� 7,/%7 /� I -,: �„ 1STFLOOR i �j/�� /� // G" TRhC1f5 / / I - / �/'// �„ /j i�// ,� �� /j"-- j GARAGE LEVELSOO A�GARAGELEV EL ! i .:". I _._ .//:��r, i�// /� /// /7 / ,.///// /i I.:. .. ,• A,2.2 I VERNON AV ELEVATION(SOr(H ELEVATION) (WITH EXISTING TREES) ......I 1,.., DIM lM IBU•BY AICMICCCTB•PLAalltal SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA 1—____47.3,_- -1311-Cr - .[I• 1 ARCHITECTURE IIi6T E91AM I PLANNING ' NTERIOR DESIG ", HISTIORIC REHABILITATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT TOPCFROOF yy�� 9:.. +963 MIN DIPP COM -�n��n_�I N230 SAN MATEO CA 99102 • r ..-Arrr ERE I t_ T ano° I r TES�IIA)Io� OMD 1 tun aaa I[tl] tam r mat ISI a umt 4931 I ti St.4111 "•"' a nun itG III I I 3ROFLOOR MAR I s - I ( 11 t .-I `*•- 1 a jb ooa �y—•__ �__ Lc__ .1 I cR»e meq" 1:11thRN Pill a nnaalrt AA1 Ell nm° lli aen I —M....—... :ago;� Planners y B�F" �.._.�._..... —�_._-- ��. 9{t =mom :..:: ion Y-' i I ©Copyright 2009 DIAP 1 1217 FLOOR I Haul ( lti i �9 1 924 _. _._. a 4, BROOKSIDE 1 I. SECTION 2-OEN!' REOOMEIWESECTION) CONDOMINIUM LOCATION 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West Edina MN PROJECT PHASE J08110. SECTIONS& ELEVATIONS ;9.3 1 1311-0"• I __ 4U-6* _ SECTION 2(GREEN PROMENAD i_—_ caL i TOP OF ROOF �� .I; ..'"V ./4<'' '�� // l SCALE oArc t `�✓ � .N -1. /...>_ ��;� ..!tit •„ FraAs 1132°=1•_0.. AUGUST 24 20'5 F w< u f ( k% t w z <.. 63 • . y i w / R - San / ® ., � 34 B REVISIONS LOFT cI $• J yr /A/ - I , S } t- �r 1' / if n. ,6 .., r 1; T ;nra 1 nun 1 nn i 3RD FLOORS �T 11 is-t � � � Y110 I l aCEltttlE �� 41EIiCHI tzycT 4 �, �1 1 •wed Pt, i ,�- '^- .1.A 4aEl1 '691 f1� i an nun mat ltwoj - I Ie 119 k 94ND FLOOR ,�.-.-. - 1 `-- Oj1A0E �v 4 a n 31.61 Ali Ib'. t r.. 101 1 1 E EOE Q - t I j 17 ST FLOOR j ^'^+�„ _. QQ- :'7■�� con I 1 MO _,,12,4_9I '�•-k--�._�.^._.,.,_'.•'�`.- '-^_•.,.-. _ �f GAR,4GE LEVEL I. I. ACI 1 . SECTION 2-(YREEM PROMENADE SECTION) Ai2A (WITH EXISTING TREES) N A P M111OfliCO AICNIT BC TM S 2IANM2RA SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA I..—Z$'{r--- 62.O 9610' --670"--- 3Q' 6�SQ' - ARCHITECTURE EAU MEIN gen 1 URPLANNING AN DESIGN ��Q6 i I I I � ; HISTORIC DESIGNTIGN t _ (TOPOFROOF 1 -J�.- — CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT I A�- _- ........-_. ; TOP OF ROOF WV.DIA,EWA -P �- l �1 1811 EpBa RACE aro sn MATEO CA (LOFT �( `"' • s' h a�a TEL M50,5muel FAX MUM 57.540 1 i 1 _ 1 LOFT (73RD FLOOR 1 ( e� I� slf FLOOR e.e. ea°e°mped,el aWm.�em T" I �- ' F)Fg ncopyrightA 20005DIAP ners OFLOOR I i� __- Q 8VEi410NAV - sx S0ST1NG GRADE _ I,1 < .a11=-1II =~;-=- ii..00R _..04 F�ooR o. ^-- - 933 , - NSA SOOUNE .i - �■■'�� •- _ TRAMS r ,. _ , _ Ige BROOKSIDE i CONDOMINIUM SECTION 1(EAST-1MEST) LOCATION 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West Edina,MN PROJECT PHASE JOBNO -C-'" SECTIONS& ELEVATIONS 2s o' 62'.0' N2}0' c I saa GT.0 SECTION 1(E-W) I� (' ..... Imo. t ..R:?TIMI -"I 1.9M_ ; 'y v r„ _ `.... , N.n..A 1 iT I�l's-1\ �� I_- 1" �'_ ( SCALE DATE TOP O'FE�_7Roof `S `'jtL,„ 'I'i� ?* [ : • '�. - �{ / 11,51 1"-‘--, fes' T'pp OF RooF 1/32"=1-0' AUGUST 24 2016 ' 971 N '4���' C 1 I `+-S•SY1�y^� REVISIONS IOFC, 7 1 ,.. C - I _ Q r 443_ 1. ,e'l 11 11 y �+ �� 7 ? 1 h r- II ;Q AVS-- ^-. -........ FRO fl+OOR A -. I: ::; Nx. ••-•• �- �til_ _ - --pl�i --�1I:1/ 11,�_ -__—_ _ ----- -._.-i II® i ! i-'�'-_- - 1__"_°- -L... - I k.A1 -,�Jl'QOR TPACN! 1 SECTION 1(EAST-WEST) (WITH EXISTING TREES) A.2.6 • — - _ __ .._ � �� �r�, J } ZEI AAM INFAMY ANCNITICTM 4 MAMMON A/ SAN RISCO B AY AREA A ARCHITECTURE PLANNING, URBAN DESIGN . !,;44:411.(9341,3t-.�.. INTE INR DESIGN 3 • .j- ,2V�6 ..,, _ . ... . _. , . ..�r�•. ... 20'-6' � t3 3'_ F`-0'-' 1 ! MSTORIC RENABILAGEp I - CONSTRUCTION,001,1 EfdENT i www.olAr eom STGRAt .�' `cv \\ , R fTR;HZo-� SORAG • SDGE�'lC ' : I8E87°7'1 -8TIX3AGE !—"^ � 1 . . - �rOLL'a O da` �,ND •�G-1lIP _l__181,64 IAL goCopyright s� ae 3o zoronzoMofj - I4'II \iTrr 143' h 1 sH APoa�ms�r�o`a cmsR.o o"^z 1,3rt mrrosrMEct ' i' 28••g•-_ 21Y-6' 19 2EC 6 �-- 28 6' t .:_ r \\ 1 4�'1- t �• I BROOKSIDE , ,_..._.I. �4 DRIVEWAY ....W_._. CONDOMINIUM 4_11...0. 0 924 (924) Mo icc ! In'''',,,,,::. ' E"4 a I �.It 10 0 mcanox J�. 't f<1 a j Q -... ,.__ rtit] _p__ ._._ r i �- �_� 5109/5117/512549th Street West ��7` '�.. _. -..::',.,:k:$..^ 1I i i E{iRFM b \ f � Edina,MN TREES I / ,` 1b ( f i F--.�� i 11 � �� / ;TRACT PHASE JOB NO. 0000-0 in 8"' ,L . E.LEVR00M I I ,1 STORAGE GUEST tit ( BUILIDNG ALAN —n i r 1 + PARKIN �' / .p i.w \ 0._6:"-(935j 1—�--�_� 8 ,o o{924) 4 GARAGE LEVEL EnsnNc `� sroRu3E .p , , srauaE ` \ /' t .. .. __, , -- wooDEDAREn 'O �\v� ��eek, ��� 1 ‘, ,,,,T.,',,-;,,mWEST BUILDING ' '------- - -- _ ,_.. „, „,-.,p,,,,,,, , ,,, � �\�� •' _ �' \� 1 SCALE 00.7E iv \ ,,:7\\:k �\ \\ � a ��:�i. '' 1/16'=1'-0” AUGUST 24,2016 ta ti DECIDUOUS TREE. EXISTING +1 \ -`\�''`� \\\�; REVISIONS t .fr''A / .10 EXISTING �\\� \ \ \\\� ,....1 �\ MMa CONIFEROUS TREE '';';',..,';',...,:,''S.,• \�\ `` �C\ �� DN \\ \\\\ ,IN,'„' `\\ ,�a ,:.--,',41.,' . . ' ,11112.-33. i i 18=3' — LI'- '.44,),'„\\:,‘„„,,, ,,,N\,,‘ \\ \\� t \ tPI::,,::.„\‘„,',. .i.10%;\ 7, \'^'!_•r.. 4 0 931 A' I's ‘,..,..:',,:i .111 I , ) �:TREESTOBEAEMOVED v`v`V`'`t`v v�A A>@t . � \�' 1 i I � ��fr+I�� „ � ,‘.:....,,,,\.,,,,::,:„N..„,,......N..,,>ty.„,,„,‘,...,,,I.501?-t.s.a.. .,„4.,...4.....;‘ ,:.... N... ...., ...,„. „.„..„., ”, '‘,',.,',$,AMSAs, A''',, '''t,*,,,,S,,,,,,...yr,tIN 'Et., ,, ,.. A.,,,.., / ” ' ' 0 . ,i 11.111111111111.111111 „sipt,...;,..W:?4,f.....4.„-V:, 1 , A.3.1 ; a1 \ i 411,40.111,,,,,,,..,.,\\1I"a. �s \ \ 45 , 'aPDPOSEDTREES jtettas ',:`,,,,,.•::.4.,,-,...,,,, 4 \\ .vA v .A�•V A:' V VV „, ` , . \-L,'' '',•- \ \•'-•\ ' \ \ ,I.' \ \ \_.. \\ �Li.--.. V-.. _r_ -, .- SA FRANCISCO FCCCCTB A ltAR�i t , \ \s'•\ \ , , -\\_ ` r- I-` Ufff 1-R _ \ \ SAN BAY AREA \ UStT 141 . > \ \\ \ ., i3►Tt001LREAl,,' \ ,:\\.. � \�'j iSfROORREAR _.. \�\ ', \ � ARCHITECTURE +3 D'1938 <I1.2- '--^ • --:4816:13IO F i �\ `- jy ) AREA'�N .�'�p�T" M t'T \ \ URBAN DES IG l _*..1:,,13,7„.(.934) _•r",i••`�"•• 251r 127.72 aa... """'�\' -..>-• Crj ONSTRUCTION REHABILITATION � 1'-0"(934) CE P230.SAN MATEO CA MO �- —T 1 I i �., I� WWW.o;aneom ill ''° I lI l I TITI1 1 _ �a f Su 'kL't 7r�i11t.p al' 4I 1 •�� Tn.(I.W 1811 BOREL S7 6cet FAX:lswl so3uo "� r .�,a !�E I1j I - m—kt.'� -tatty yi: Xm,. .,• I' I 4'��.` TRASH i 1 ob , 'f� Hilb ► V _.. {' I �iuaG�`t•c Ilp I T 1 7 n Copyright zoos oinP / lilt! ��In.� I �® Nm.� ! r 1 1. • 143-0 1346' 1 m m — Ii (__ M I t — \\ IRIBROOKSIDE 111,1!-13.-,r, �� Awl �' ��. a �--- ` , '' w — : 1 Y I �• a AY CONDOMINIUM 1 4_1. _,, — 4... w i11.�.Os;. _.-- P E e . ..73 4- _ _J,.a-D....(935Y uP��i �p 1� __ N.. ' ,..11.-0.1_10241-4—r--- 4111, ci- I Y \`�( CD—q) 1 0 0: . 10=0 __ _ LOCATION >. // 'n `. i� `-`, '- a _ lid 1 ''" \ 5109/5117/512549thStreet 1:31 4 :1..I;;',," •,..':� _G'. p�� 934) Edina.MN �� - -• 3 PROJECT PH45E TREES LEVEND r ,,,,,771.r. ,.r 1•� _ b ' INN 1-F — N:F.;§ 41 irifil: b � , ,, fi I 1P.T' (' i:�sl GUESj I 1 __.....__ i — BU1SIDNG PLAN t S P i 1 �� o —LSS�I �'- I 1 1F p'. , EYISTIYO -1'-9 1934) T LEVEL e E•. —• / WEST BUILDING WOODED AREA "� ba•-I--1S, FA --_ n' I —14-0= I—15ir —I 6 G•I_ r, iuP y...--g.5.--1 S 5'_-, . /, _""�..�_ I \ �� 1a. SCALE DATE 1/16"=1•_0" AUGUST 24.20 6 J EXISTING p �~ % REVISIONS `^ DECIDUOUS TREE '� i EIII 111111,*4" UNIT1•F ti W • ., ,AREA; 11125.112 WET j,• `, tX)1k7+�At 1ii6.1211Y \ 17 127.72 PA `R'-0" oEac inn SIFT. • CONIFEROUS TREE ,-- •--27r . \.',•a '•3' 11 . ...- -- 15' ..) ) ---- (irk, ` ` ON /, \ +3'-E. 193: \ \ — 1 _gip+s Q-( \, `, - 63' � 1 17 3�-{.r new-- I• TREES TO YE REMOVED({ 1 "it1 i \21,\\: ----3' ---- 4 -- �\ Vi 4%,=YQUP j\ A.3.2.1 . ,, , ,\,,,,,,, , , .47:4 .__ / 14410\\1,. �. - /1/ �--\., PROPOSED TREES F 1 2,N:.7."-. 7s.::,:::_:: , f ; O 1 _ . _,. _ ....._ D _ t, , \„, _.,_, 350 I 366 � 35.•6• 35'0 . ,,,.,,,„.....,,,,,.... . ,. \..\\ . :\ 1 DAN,CM;CV ARCH ITICTI I.PIANISM \" UNIT 1-R-AFF-END- . \ \ `t.`UNIT 1=3=AFF:CENTER ,.',UNIT 1-R-AFF-CENTER 'wilt 1-R-AFF-END\. \ ,� \ \:' ) \� SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA 't51'I{OCItl161RfFiOPM4EEND -\.,-,�\ - \ .`15t AEAft�AFFOROABLECENfEI I �ISLROdi AFFCR01&ECENTEI .Y.1TRbORAF/RAFFOIC�EEIQ'\..\\`� N \ /�` `�. ........... ARCHITECTURE ' t PTEA IM1.+Ni,Q.F:t. .._ _�,.1.0.``E °AREA: 91&71 SQ.F. t covEREEoA L71-SQ•F�''''' p ''•!!1.10 '1 \ ' ' URBAN E IsGN DEgC 1 M.7i OO.FL DECK 67.86 SO.FI—25 -- DECK 61.86 SQ.F1 _ ':1ti. �I_ 1 9$4) - 'tt CONS MANAGEMENT Iii (I I i I 1.: _.. _.1, -1-4L(93.4) I www.olaa.com INTERIO DESIGN HISTORIC REHABILITATION INTERIOR MANAGE � _o— I� I; — ��I ���I�.i_ — i i i [L-- ► TRASH 1811 SOREL TEL MO 570401 FA%1550)570 MO 12.4E. ATEo t..„ 02 ...,' � �__^_-____� :I IFit: ^tea,. MIR 1-11 O1IR1.1 P ANo-`fib e.re,," .a I•,) i Q U6R 1-A ' ' ( I� Bm Io es AmNkm 6 P mrs , .•N _. .-.i. Mal 'copyright 200BDIAP pmm `'m'' ,,,. I T43 0• - -I: `_ 34'6• �„�._ ME16 j l -l,`. ���I i 1' (-) '_EMI° . I !- ri ', a---�P. 34'- -, w ----- --i ,. ! DRIVEWAY.. w CONDOMINIUM a 6 , - _ oE" n.._. _ 0 3 - 1l oaE N k---4; w F,.-.— h . .U'---(8 �) ti sr 11'_0 S m LPN .rA MK.NN-ii „ ( ....Eli - -_7_, ; L - E ,:e �`i\ -_. m �'W"`_ F' 1'-0' 934) ^'�. slos/s117/slzsaslnstEaelwBsc ///::: I� Edina,MN TREES LEYENO ;�` `°-' N ) ��� �� t PROJECT PHASE J09 ND. / : OOIT 1-F am+Ia.b our(1-F ,� , Et 1. ` !I� (I;i� '.I. I`, i , PARKN UILIDNG PLAN. 1I I 1 , i 1+'o„'b24) L.__ 1ST LEVEL(AFF.UNITS) EXISTING 1 0”034) ' ��a 0�-b—L$95�'� -' I 1 'I .,4 /....... 'i 7 t \ jWEST BUILDING .1... WOOOEDAREAI / .46.47_1._-15.. 1.... 41,1).....____________0-147.7.12,40... �_ 14'02• r. 15'd' 6-0' 8 5.__1 op 1 "'- , �, 4-y„A, SCALE DATE / `"^�.-.. _-"•,`""`*- \. �'.�.' 1/16'=1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 EXISTING ' ' I )- / / � 11P11°,1)- `.,* REVISIONS DECIDUOUS TREE , ' ' lEI i r. wi 'i4 .� q�A" / P ` /l- UP-.7.' 'Fu°G1'FMM Ili* lily'____ .__ sarnocerac F'``-.=�Z �. �4 1 /( r ' . ,.. •. r u : 1025.12 QS T covEREOARR.,1126.K KEY t \ EXISTING ASO• 127 7214.FT (`8° OEgC i27.7211#.-(461400 t .://7..° CONIFEROUS TREE ~\\\�; - `ON. Ili 3: . - - t______....4,420;;...::_.:::— E 1" •3 ) J,l e §=mac '\ \\\\ +3-'11\ • 1 u'E I 63'4 )i1�1�)uP Ir;;i*, - • `\� , •I1Z3 +/ r..r+' • '-b'_.cs2s') TREES TO BE REMOVED il ,,,....4.1„filit I \'e�r�.'� � \•,.'s-\\N,,', I —., k ,_ .� ,—.._. -���� ..(\ \ I0 UPI c• ,/ if- . A.3.2.2 „----., A.312.20 .41( ., . _ ...._. . ___ . _ . _ . ...._ . ___ . _ . _ . _ _ . ,...., ;2_ 1 _ DiAp . , PO —_- . MI;CM rICMITtCTII I PURISM — _ SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREAR2R u '^ N 201.00111101ER t ARCHITECTURE CO M TE ODESCOVEREDAREA: 1i21.2$SQ.FTCOVREDEMi 1811•13141.1 REAR k M� DECK 127 7�wpr R• _. me 127'72 _ y N CONSTRUCnON MANAGEMEM {_, i www.01AP.coM 1 25 — _4. ; i01ra...0)5 6601 FP%ACE MO SAII,6 0,s a6un01 ' I `rt ; I �. 11 sear, — ,a..Pia t?' lYl� ��E. i � L. i E " Dan w0 A 66 z z Planners _ INR 2-1 l s•. T NIT 2.11 I.� E: .... J Copyright 2009 DIAPnv IMI I '• p ,-143'•0' ,i 34'•6' o I la `" 111 .�L. .]. x= — �� bo 't - -- - �r1 _ --- ---- --- _- _..._ re or } e. -I i--1- _v -760. _ ►t, i. BROOKSIDE rz , �I� rMu�.; , 0 . i jAik � w CONDOMINIUM • 70 a lty,, I.J.,:s • ::::!::.;7F:Af 4(:). { 1-1-, :rn I r vt � .„, mi I: LE0 LOCATION - I 1 'I 1 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West I Edina,MN C R" INV PROJECT PHASE JOS NO. LI Boor. . - + BUILIDNG PLAN �{ nr T� ' , _J'' / 2ND LEVEL .-1.-0"L934I I i _.. .r+� l t5 0 6 /I/ WEST BUILDING r 1,. U -4-6'471---14'401•-------14'4* 23.1•—__ ___.�=='--2.7-'-- -23�•t}'----{-----14'-0'-- --- ' -�-6'4Y--- / 'I \ \ i ---_ - �^14 I -� \ SCALE DATE ` ~ �--..,,-, f`^�i , 1/16"=1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 / c / V 24 ! ' .. REVISIOxs I I 2110 FLOORFR01rt`... '�, / / '` iiites-v FT COVEItEOAREA 1i4EiiiQ.ET., � —� A;.• 127.722Q.Fi. 1 cEa: 127.72 S1.UL /7"/ • tT fl ,111` I r , � i I , __1 A.3.3 �,f -- % f . f . , l , , iDIAP .... . _ . _ . _ . _„_,,_>_ . _ . _ . _ ........„ . — . . T . _______ _ _ . ._... . ._._ _ . _ . _ _..— ii ViDLefillE A• LE ( __..._.. L auv 03 __... .... .__._..- .._ .' JJJ���}/////�� axli[ETI a PLANNERS b-1, ( OAR IONISES AN cov oeRFa 1374.4E84LT ( MEk 1$74:NiQF.T SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA �" — ; _.. ._._.. ARCHITECTURE ' mac 127.72 fp.L ^�i ._ ''_._._1 72 _. , PLANNING URBAN DESIGN INTERIOR DESIGN 14'-10•-'-_1 14,4 _--I-_—_-23• •_.- _- 1 1 .._...1.. ...i-...- _ C0 NONSTRUCTIONMANAGEMENT5} I 12 70= ( 12 102 I-_ . ._33 14 4• 14 10' „ ,...,..CONI :u tl1S z z a� 1 1 x1 1 p t EO CA 94402 TEL 050 06081, FAX 0 SAN b 1. �� -�_25i--tvi 1 C'� +�"1A _ _ 11 ±dIi � 14=r_l', .rvl�6Ld_��T 1,pi .�,_.�. t I.IhilLLi:i^.._.=_■� .'7111 _ L <> . h-' ) * 0 # ' Liiii — `� f W CONDOMINIUM \ � L::P z :z 1 4 I V,:',-�-- r J D"(946) 1�'11/11!4,,I)1 f �. T , 1 MIDI*1 €€z€t 1Cm.�;�' i� W C T� r-231111 1 �� _ V ...... > �J i 1 1 611a ' ~ y pZ� ,' ,>''' t limkiail 1 i 1,: .i.,_ , _ 7 1st i. /77....f tli€tc�at�5�l+1 t 1 w 13 1 ; ,, i - IT 4... ( –� i ' riw R 13 ( 1, �.......-_._._ - LOCATION Y €€/Tr"'6 . 1 r `* Ii'i fz z 1 1 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West :1 #€ ;1# — — 1't6#+E €Iii! 16'N> tt.: S i :�a� rlfipp { i ! Edina,MN €t 9�ttYL.K>S 1 1.rw ..� I i l 6 1't«'T.. 'e _., 1 € , f ' 11811 a"1' L'.t9 f€ 1S€ ........• 1 I , 1 qsr` 6 K c^ r nII l:1 PROJECT PHASE JCB HO. j1 {{ Y � a +6'0"(941 6 €€16 �� �� CT `' WAIN LEVEL) �� atNi�1{j1 •NI f�� 1:1[1W...-410:--7—, , A V .b:.t V'i �9NC..rrli 1 S S �" 5,1i�, � E � ai5 �`" I�j I �j (� #t€L t�,� rf BUILIDNG PLAN tR t r e .I # II 1•.. 1 — E1 // 1 _...— i f 11 514' 'L �1 22.11' 1 / WEST BUILDING � I 1 _ 1--14.10'-1---14.4• r- 22'-11k I _13'..1x1— ,.6M 44' I 14'•10'--1 \ \ %/ / 3 /` ii• -•-'`_' I`6,-0. JN..,'1 SCALE DATE I.... �'^ 13141_ 1 �~ �V �.i', 1/i6"-t•-0" AUGUST 24,2016 REVISIONS t - LEVEL _OMIT a-P MANI / ,-.7.-z--„,..- , tMff �&Iii 1`,] plA 1a9L14$Q.F.i Orn nu . 1$N.1 F 127 72$Q.1: p 127.72 i1.FT. -i- .y' + \ ..,z.....,R,„ _i , "..„_______________ ,,,,..,,,,,,\,,,:•\:, I� 1 1 !1 f L ' -;___s� _. � - ______+I II I ,' i( / ; 1fr \l,'-$ _ 0 4 III50,0I f I— „- — — ' _ _ _ . _ ); {ay I t LOUT T LEVEL) PAM IO F//CV ARCHITECTS/PEANFIFI 1aoLENiilEtit•I TLE.e.) SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PANED/MA: MAWS I F k— 'N "i E ARCHITECTURE OECCIC .....IQ FT. DEM ""' N UR6AIO PLANNING^- 0 _ _. p� I- I 1 :{X i CN ONSTRUCINTETION MANAGEMENT __ 1w •^.. if': » I 7_j_jSQ_'_' E7.T...:Tl'sN. www.SIAP.com 1 RIC PLACE AN MATEO CA i utl'>liZg".t.re I >:F TEL oI"sot 570-6641 asa' .A..:Issol nacsao s r.... MIL III\\`ti #C islil��l1i ..� \ 11.___ - Z—• I �\ 'ii Ei Pliii• ' ` I ''s /�� MMN MOTO \,� i n..>.nDoo loves u^ARAtas FePlenrersns�e " OMNI gum MUM MOTO \, ~ / MOW / \ MOW \,\` II..// 1 % _ , t7 Copyright 2000 DIAP T I � \ pH r •11 143'0' M:Ul:�f '� i f, M111 '�`' � �� �iiIlllluillMllh1pI ;II tV4 , .,.,..._ ..-_. 1-C iNRZ1 1 iii CONDOMINIUM i iiky I ....1i1MEM 1 ( le, _.i .._ I __..._. o) ,40:,,�., i ITI1 a ii•iia a a a 1 '7 I : ' 11 111 q ii I 1 INT SF 1: �!IE I —, .= rs,-- 1" a> -- IIthh11ll1! lli i Imo'.: _'� V.� "' �', \ I:� \ t ; ..)i__:. ._; �_ Loc,,,,,,,, 49t \ / �; J' 'WM" II ., - j stosistt7lst2s4stnStreet West .. ti. .� E y J' i ), "` 111 ., si. i '1,1 .' :t' i �\ I Edina.MN a;,�,� \ ,>, \\ I I J PROJECT PHASE MONO. 1 / \\ MM70 OfEI• � OIfI110 OIO/T9 �/ \` I , i\__ �, �`,�ON "*°" lam V I 1 1 I! BUILIDNG PLAN i ��� 11#hl r v �� �_� I 2,-,'1 .t:131.1111111 \ 1 ._--, ��� %� ��. 11 LOFT LEVEL I / * r n WEST BUILDING t� N �\\\ =14 b'--23=1k---,---=----1---- 2br9' 1'—'1 • \\.. �,_�-^'_ I _-_ 1� '_. I \ e/ V, i SCALE DATE —,-____ -147-0•-- -`-— -; 1/16,1L0•• AUGUST 24,2016 it ___. REVISIONS UNiT• F 1, L I i 'r. ____•'_",,,,-^'"`^,,.J ,I •�pF74E18,) 71161EVflFPONf• i .E 121$$9.FT C01 11AFA IMO Sit j' it_ •, 4------• I - ---- 1.I /...*:"."•V N' .. --,,,,/. \\ II I, -'----1 . i I I,ii I i _ _ ,__ti 1.- *iii[+ 1 �I�ti,i,/, , A.3.5 \ � �// { l�'i r� _I �``L , ......... 10 ' ''' ' ., t fi • t0! t• Cd e r; .....tr-.:, .,-1,,,,,, .'L),,,I.1.2.:-°-- .:,.-- ' :.:: .,.:i it Rlr,'_.,,ita 5 ,..,,-,,,..i.,,,,..., t l..., a+r'fit"' `,w ' I titit. a. t 1,'tN r +t a; k- L r.. �z. - 4,- pif ,: !" � r f ,"3 •r t Ctrl ', Y` . • �``. ,'.1/,'..''''..'5'•...if%)..-.i.-^,71 i i'41i ,. . r. ti ' II, * ,,,-4.-,,,,-- r i r' .a — rar d, l 4.% k • vt t'',4 .:-,A.p,..,,...,,k...._ .:7.- %.,„, .., , . _ , .;e?.' 1:4* .: ., 7 1`ate ..,.....,.:t.t".r o(49 • ; W i rr O • z ,, t t d er , I :a. A I ,Y -x3, ! 1.... VERNON AVE—LOOKING WEST , . ...-- ... .... ,-.:.............:.., . ....... ..... . . .. — ... —, . ,.,,„,-. -'.., -'.'--•.,.'-'.-...-'(.4 ,..-' ,. . . - . ,-. f-,;-'.-..;-' • , ": ,'„;::-..::,......-'''' - . .. - c,,,...... . „..-,... ;;'''-'- , . . — . ....-- . , . .., - _ _ - ..- .-1, . 1.r-• .- .. , .':., - --.'1- ..:-..„--.--.....:.kr, .-. '-r-n— ' • ......_ - ...-1 -- •:.t/ '.., • - . ..i,1 : ., :.1 . ' ''''.'.*:'#A.''A:-":- -..;-$•,;.:.':..."'s` -04 ,;. _ .-. ,.)% .: 1,,.ti.i,.....1 i.. ...,...0. ri., .;.. r..r. ,.ii litv ., •,r* 6-- . ', '. c'\' • . '• ' ' . ''''' , e- ' " r. . 4 - .., , -N`• . ...'.. - „.„It ..,,,. ••,-7, :. 44. ...,,,;./^-....-.',..F.:.... I 1 glig fli ---; -1.- ,i....---__,-- - _-, ,11.1111 * -•.. ' . , . .:.',1\'''' •' ' ' ..."`.1,..1' ''="..7" - '. ::" i All gill 6i mut_ [.] ..i 11 IIM' ' .. ..L..1 1. '!0.. ..,::',1:1::.•2-.7.i' -.,.!"',:- ,..-..-tr"---1-1- - -$. ''''' ilit f... ••,,!...c,,,,, ,,..7.,...,, . , 0,„, .,, ---, rtrai :-,AzI, . ., -I--•. • ,, - -••= . , , .. ail ig I .- .-'7,'*.ki4s ''''• 4'-';'' ' 1 741ra +-A. .:.7$.:••'`:111' ' I !I'. i J.4*'''::thl.'-'...'7."..•;, .t As.IS,* e' WI L L ' ' ' . ' ' - • i -.. ' '4".• ' --.••1 '' ,..'•'' . , 't• . L./Y- 0 , . .....-• ;mi. L - r ,4:..7„.A.; , . drr.„, _k jiL.I r . - "'''' ..,'-, ...--.1iri • '''. ' ri'43,.. .. ,IV a IP‘. ,,,z4A,. ,,-.7' l ;,' rr„..,... ...ri •irit— it c.!. Ili II gi ', ...-.., ..-. ,. ‘4.4 • qv ,ui: , ,,, - , ...., , •,.....A .. le ,„ , ' ---- '-', ,„-. t „,i --,,,•-:„.:,,,,-.•-,-.• , ,.• - 44 • ,.., ..s.,—, . "." ....i.,4'...e.,m ft 111 11, - II! ' NMI 111 N :77. -: — ,-.1 --,-7i, - ...,., , , I' . .IL. ' „lit LW ? Yti: 111',- I,.. .,,. . ,.;,, ., ' L•• 'MO' • IL 1 . " ' .IPA, - ' '-'1"j.-- ' '•• '''' " 1 . •,...+ZLL,....2.7"... "- ''''' ''-'''' '' ''''''' '*.-1.,kr•I'._ : ', .--i, : 0,:. _ " '- -.. '''' •-*"' ' • 1 ' ''.. i7/'- .--- ' "'J.. ..- *4 * , 11 4 •A' - '7% '. '.11r i ',f. e : '''''' ,.: ' # * - .. . ' :. . ' .."'' ,. ' s 4 . . 'I .* *, : .. t , , . . . . • ' * ; - - .. . •- , „. . . '''' r ,. . . . . . , . . . .. ,. -17 4,--- - - ......—F. 1 .,., . ., . - iiViZilrr ' 447e -= ,4.... JUN.2 ' .... 4 1. rill(.1 .., ......, Y.Ir 44-Di i I ,• g :.J2.;.'2!'....!......4.i7 ,J Lrtiani ..if... .'llii,.;•...i..".rt--5)L .-e1,1:0 . --_____ . ....____ -..--.... '0- g a: :1 yi 4 i fat; ilzf, P_- 'itP o ii oeffle tilui 9.-o S-0:A Eb .1- ‘, :eiiit Ssvc- zogli u u F-A > illii ii '1 / ... 1 1 t 0/5z! cl, --- g __ 1-'-- .•,F •--- - i • 1 ; . - .• r- -' Vlh 0 i -- i e et . --23 . _ e•-•• I' h 9. .- ,i t i i R BM I fl-fre, iiillikr.6g Iv - g i, ' ! 1 - ELIO ;4 i.g3itqa io fi PrilLatE.' „A:P , E ;i ! iitli: i V t V 0000000G)0000000a100.0.000 • r '•.0 II 1 \ 3tW1 'II Nonvois3m --. V 2 7r rfk -0 ,.. • ',.-,==-'1,-• , ._ . IR. . _ t_ . •-.NI:.-':.:.• 6•`'' ° .i: ' .14C)1477;r tt • ' '. VV?:ti • \'''.\\ ' .:6-CV. /4/t/i;i°0\;')?...rA;St. V1.4 i •,.,.,.-. _': . • ' '*') .--- ...,-(2.,7....1_—..--,..1 , • k-;_,;.;• _ --''''EIJI 1 i# , 1 — .---- / /"---fr. : a -40, ',Irl c •,..1 ID 11_ - ' • t .1,1 Ev te 4 .1 -. '"4. ' , *11 i —- ,..2:6. k1 • -Lr-1 - Ai . 7- - 4 - - ilti...; '-- . iii•i If .- r-Ltill 7.;I ( : f: • ,itt _ 't .' •'_7 -- ' .:: ..-, ..- Ili... —_1 0, — 1 ----ill c. [-____. -,...:9:;.• 4 cg I-A ., 1 i. ,,st• 1 -'-'-‘1, I I, •, OLT-Am 01-)---,14---.::1m j .,, ,•::-.;.,__ _ .. r li•,,In. .. .1- ., e r irri.ii • ..r.,.„,- r- L . .- it ,• '.- F.; .4 .: rii .„ t'v•' •ov000.•-••'•., e 1•,.,,, RN 11 i Fl_ . ( .,1: .. lik p Slots: . ivi 10 4, - \ 1 - --b EIRE,^a- 4-44( . Igil -7..,' , 4 - .1 '77.- 7 j_ '''''' (6,4wki EAA '717--'=?. -i'• a : 7)... I . -• I%z --Ttze-,z4s DO CI:4.3:- -- ,_ r____, .....A \\ r="1 - -, 411‘ ,A• ---- .• \-4/..k Ili', \ ‘,-tIk*I'L) . . . e,......_ ..t. t , . 4,... - • •:),*-----` 4-\,-cai.:- _I:::. 1.\ elk 1 . 1 \'*At —- o Vg4 lk." -\ , ''',,'' 1111 [-)4 : ..: •\,, "- .., — . ....., r" ', . • IA ..-ca./,...:17.71 4.. 7;47 • i y/ II I I ani.. ,..... I" .. ,, _ ,. 1 I . -,... ...4.,„).c a bo,0 0 14-...,4 .- 0-m&i.'-F70. , ' •ff,10....Aviv,.t i - • '--.'''_:_i 1 .--.1.--t i r biAlli L,_-NL OMP-: -. . ARI -:rt:IP.1 1-' gle. ilk ' \ \ailifirti," 4 aS • or Great Oaks August 31, 2016 Mr. Cary Teague, Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 sent via email to cteague@edinamn.gov Re: Sketch Plan Review of proposal to amend the current PUD zoning for three contiguous properties owned by Gerald O'Brien (5109 and 5117 49th Street West) and Robert Kimmel (5125 49th Street West) together with a small tract (25' wide) currently owned by the City of Edina adjacent to 5125 49th St. West. Total land area is approximately 62,387 SF or 1.43 acres. Cary, We request the Planning Commission's consideration of the Brookside Condominium Sketch Plan submittal describing proposed redevelopment of three properties currently zoned as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for 16 three- story town homes. The current zoning was established about three years ago, but the town home project envisioned has proven not to be viable. The existing ten residential units on the site are comprised of a derelict home (ca. 1922) and nine apartment units built in 1958 which are still in use. Our proposed design for the redevelopment recognizes key features of the site and addresses the Edina market demand for new high-quality housing at this location: The site-- • Has a long unbroken frontage on Vernon Avenue while street access is from 49th St. West. • Highway 100 is about 350' east of this site, with the Vernon Avenue exit ramp adjacent to the site on its south boundary. • The Soo Line Railroad owns right-of-way and maintains an active track adjacent along the west side of this site. • This area faces the Grandview district to the south and is the zone of transition from high traffic and commercial land use to the south single family land use to the north. 1 • The site has a significant slope down from Vernon Avenue to 49th St. West. • Approximately fifty single family homes comprise the neighborhood located north of the site which lies between 49th St. West and Minnehaha Creek. The oldest homes in this area date from the 1930's but most of the homes were built around 1951, and a few are newer. • The site includes a 25' strip of land vacated by the city which lies between 5125 49th Street West and the Soo Line right-of-way. The market for new homes at this location— • Is primarily driven by empty nesters selling larger homes in the Edina area, who want to remain in the community. o They prefer to down-size and enjoy community maintenance done by professional management. o They prefer floor plans with all basic functions on one level. o They expect a heated, secure garage facility. o They are active seniors who prefer not to be in a designated 'over 55' community. • There is a secondary market of younger couples and individuals who like the same fundamental amenities as empty nesters. The proposed redevelopment as 27-unit condominium homes has a similar FAR to the current townhouse plan, but in its form and residential demographics would be very different from the existing PUD: • The current PUD has 43,567 SF of heated living space. The new plan will have about 44,000 SF of heated living space. The current PUD has an average size home of 2,723 SF and the new plan will average about 1,630 SF per home. • The current PUD has a high degree of site coverage and almost no useable open green space. Two exhibits to this memorandum illustrate the contrast in useable open space between the current PUD and the new plan. In the new plan site coverage is only 31.6% of the land area (about 19,686 SF), with landscape representing the balance of the site, which is almost one acre. The new site development concept is an elegant pair of buildings approximately 96' apart with a large landscaped courtyard between the two buildings. 2 • The new plan includes a path from 49th Street to Vernon Avenue which will provide a pleasant walk through the center of the site for access to the Grandview commercial district south of this location and integrate the condominium community with the neighborhood. The current PUD has a walking path by the railroad that seems to end at a traffic barrier on Vernon Avenue. • The traffic generated by 27 condominium homes will be no greater than the traffic from 16 townhomes occupied by active families. • The current PUD has no affordable housing. With reference to the City's November 2015 guidelines for inclusionary housing, the new plan will provide six units (22.2%) in the 'affordable' class listed as two-bedroom homes with a 2015 price of about $300,000. Other key features of the proposed new development include: • Two buildings which are very similar, one with 13 units and one with 14 units. Both buildings have the same garage footprint of about 8,600 SF as shown on the Site Plan. • The parking garage will provide two parking spaces for each conventional unit and one parking space for each of the affordable homes, together with storage space for the homeowners. • The architectural style of the buildings is intended to reflect classic Nordic features such as sloped roofs, covered decks and a heated garage. • The basic form of the buildings is three housing levels above the parking garage with a partial fourth level providing a loft area for homes on level three. • Along 49th Street West the site plan provides for 11 guest parking spaces, which includes two full size truck parking areas for service. • With limited site coverage, it will be possible to preserve in the new development many large trees currently on site. The railroad tracks to the west of this site would continue to be buffered by a heavily wooded area. In order to accomplish the goal of having at least 20% of the new homes moderately priced (less than half the price of conventional homes), the project will require modest financial assistance from the city, which has been discussed with Mr. Teague and Mr. Neuendorf. We have consulted with local realtors who advise us that the affordable units should not materially detract from marketing 3 the conventional units. We currently estimate the net project cost of including six affordable homes (22% of the total) to be about $550,000. We also request that the developer and city engage in a discussion regarding the potential of making the walkway through the site a public amenity and finding a mutually beneficial arrangement to support that function. The proposed revision to the existing PUD, we believe, incorporates the site better into the neighborhood and ties the neighborhood better into the fabric of the community. The condominium homes will bring more seniors into the neighborhood. The affordable homes within the new project will maintain demographic diversity within the condominium community. The project's 'promenade' from 49th Street up to Vernon Avenue will connect the project to the neighbors and connect this neighborhood with the Grandview commercial district. We look forward to discussion of our redevelopment plan with the Planning Commission. If the commissioners are favorably disposed to the new project, this site will need to be reclassified in the city's Comprehensive Plan from mid-density housing to high-density housing in order to facilitate the 27-units of new housing. Best regards, N. Edward Briesemeister, CRE neb@greatoaks.us.com 404 789 4447 Great Oaks CC: Brad Schafer Robert Kimmel Gerald O'Brien Maureen Michalski Amanda Janzen Tom Threlkeld Tom Dillon 4 Mr. Cary Teague, Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Sketch Plan Review of proposal to amend the current PUD zoning for properties owned by Gerald O'Brien (5109 and 5117 49th Street West) and Robert Kimmel (5125 49th Street West)together with a small tract currently owned by the City of Edina adjacent to 5125 49th St. West. Total land area is approximately 62,387 SF. Cary, ( acknowledge and consent to this Sketch Plan application. /"76'( v5 C Robert Kimmel Date rkimmel@k2ins.com 415 225 7475 /41.f,ficA/ ff / ' 31 7 z-ol‘ Gerald O'Brien ate 2625 Valley Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 612 889 1153 N . M 0 I M o • o �i M '''. 1. N . 1 \ c, ) 1 8 • o 000 $0©00'' o� a t:�_ air al► , p fa --' j5. i �• �r� x . tt ,�q G '� -- •F dna. • C ��" qo IE • ee 4. i 1 ,IiIn u11 ! kilT i,rti '``: ,- �, �,; ; Ii? o l' 1 iiNiiiii:al.Aiii 111 e-At Wpm y � t� i .....4„:„... ,...,« _ _ 9, ` � � ' ��. a w 1!'! I IOC,f Ak - 1 i1 ,cy-• -, III ; •i 5� C imam X11 __ •• 7 = 0 "rr^----• •Y is i L____I\0 3 J ftr.MAIL.,_, m'� e ilAlt • ati \Two: �n , ---- girl/ R i � •` _�� :' az , --- eee, eo ;rkq _ili ii f. * ____— ,---- ,iii' •° 11 V 'i �— �� \ �• 111 , II 1 11 �� II 4 `` \u."_-'..-"._/ VII ft O .,I , ii , - , :, i , ii .. 1 • 1111:11' 111 '•iag ram II!Ii! ef • - :/° 41101) I ' t I 6 _ `t .' J1111. I ( ill■ "y � ,� li�ir l(IILET�► ir. 000e0 0000 0 0 G100 0 OA 00000 00 • • • • • • 111111 IIII1111111 , , III111 IIIIII111111111111IIIIIIII111111IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111 „ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII OvolniV I Na3H1fi0S ONY 01311H1210N SI1Odtl3NNIW 1 evla91WUAW.*., d V I J ti0 SWt11NIWOaNO3 3a1S)1OO219 -SV321V N3d0 NVIHiS3O3d/N33219 NW `eu!P3 `SWf11NIWOaNOO 30153100219 - - 14(314111K — / ' I —— S SO I —— I -- 00* uil j —— III rn __ z cA 9 O j SaNlUlln9 1S3M — — _ JNI01I1181S1/3 30VN3WONd N3380 I _ _ z 0 — — — — r - t I I - - O iI _ _ _ • =— I E I -_ M 133alS H161? -- • CITY OF EDINA MEMO 9Zr1A. City Hall• Phone 952-927-8861 w Fax 952-826-0389•www.CityofEdina.com 0 e v �•�y0 Date: September 14, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review—7200 France Avenue The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the 3.51 acre parcel at 7200 France Avenue. (See property location on pages A1—A3.)The applicant is requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing office building on the site, and redevelop it with a six-story, 241 unit apartment building with parking on the first two levels. The applicant is proposing 10% of the units to be affordable. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4-A22.) To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: ➢ Building Height—from 4 stories to 6 stories. ➢ Housing Density—from 30 units per acre to 69. ➢ Floor Area Ratio (FAR) —from .5 to 1.58. A rezoning to PUD-5, Planned Unit Development would be required to ensure the affordable housing element. All traffic would access the site off 72"d Street. No access is proposed off France Avenue. Some of the existing mature trees along the west lot line would remain with extensive ponding proposed. Boulevard style sidewalks are proposed along 72nd and France, with sidewalk around the ponding area and along the south side of the building. The compliance table on the following table demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with a high density residential zoning district (PRD-5) and how it compares to the project that was proposed for this site but denied in 2014. (See the previously proposed plans on pages A23-A24.) City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO © Yz) o •l�t Fi nr>�� idea City Standard Previous Project Proposed (PRD-5) Building Setbacks Front—France Avenue Based on height of 26 feet 31 feet* Front—72nd Street the building— 27 feet 15 feet* Side—South Estimated at 70 5 feet 20 feet* Rear—West feet 75 feet 180 feet Building Height Four stories and Five Stories& Six Stories** 48 feet 77 feet Maximum .5% 1.88% 1.58%** Floor Area Ratio(FAR) Parking Stalls 200—retail 202 spaces 2 per unit(1.25 enclosed) 375 stalls 385* • 482 required ' enclosed Parking Stall 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Size Drive Aisle 24 feet 24 feet Width *Variance Required **Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required The proposed uses would be an upgrade to the current use of the site. However, the proposed density is significant, and nearly triples the density allowed on site per the existing Zoning. The table on the following table highlights high density residential development in Edina. The most recent projects, with higher densities were located in the CAC, Community Activity Center which allows up to 105 units per acre. This site only allows 30 units per acre currently; however greater densities have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study, however not decided upon. City of Edina • 4801 W.506 St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO I �'�91/A�l'� /~ f,t', o e �. )1;, alO • Ilea High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300-50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 6500 France—Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar 6725 York 240 52 The Millennium 6550 Xerxes 372 66 Gateway Pointe 3101 66th Street 210 105 7200 France Project— 7200 France 195 69 Proposed City of Edina t 4801 W. 50th St. ^ Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO yt'$. O •``c�itOF1'nc� TRAFFIC/SITE ACCESS A traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. A full access off 72nd Street with no access off of France is proposed. This arrangement is the opposite of what the Council was requiring with the previous project. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Per the city's affordable housing policy, 10% of the units should be affordable. With the inclusion of affordable housing, and if the project is considered favorably during sketch plan, the site should be rezoned to PUD to ensure the affordable housing element. PUD The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; 71111111.11.111111111.M1111.11111111.1111City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO 04(12 )1;1 \O g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal is consistent with the land use pattern in the Comprehensive Plan, creates a solution for a significant drainage problem on the site, and utilizes a pedestrian oriented design with the boulevard sidewalks, sidewalk all around the site and around the ponding areas. The proposal does preserve some of the mature trees, provides a transitional public space between the building and the twin homes to the west. COMMPREHENSIVE PLAN This property is located in the OR, Office Residential District in the Comprehensive Plan. Primary uses are offices, attached or multi-family housing; secondary uses include limited retail and service uses (no big box). "Vertical mixed-use is encouraged and may be required for larger sites." Development guidelines include upgrading existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment, encourage structured parking. This project does not meet the goals of vertical mixed-use. While the building would be an improvement over the existing, staff has concern about the mass of the building so close to the street, the architecture,the lack of engagement from the building to the sidewalk, and no underground parking. Mic Johnson, the City's consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Study reviewed the proposal and provided the comments that are attached on page A25. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 InteractiveFil Property �viaps i i r t ; i; Ma • C'3 �5�.11 ,4 r iri,t-4.1,7,., i; I . t 0 1 7'Ig i a� f .+� X _ i 7,211 ` i ` ._.-._.-....,....,.,. t:4ZELTC !ROAD r ,i '. .� 7112' u7- 1' Y 4i rf:a,-/ 1 o i=. q, ora 1 `" � y 27-: �; • I 3 _': 1 � �� '� � fcc' i ,�� 1 'J � f '+� �`'�.,. IA 1 r i s J '.�..- -4 •ail `~ `"y! t-g�`3' ``ai.. F -� 1 _ _-� a E�i '�_'1 129 7 8' i ' '1�2`6' 2 — + r , y ' L _ , a. 1 u I x i `i7--1, I- • ti �, � _ , • « - "1 �f ��' � � � ' ilex t + '� f �i' [[ ;_..4,;:,,; - �•II P % E1 _ r i ,+� 7,r- 'y *' `"? :2 - t e4: _ .14:A �1G+ I' "7i ;scy rpt --14 ,•, a, + 7216 _ fir. 7 i'—f."1,4, -; ,; .ite.0 4 5"-Ny,, ,._44,.. ,,, - 4-4,41,,, i I 7 Gl u ,- .-,`pl .,,i.. h-1-1,1 s. fr - f _ o Na r- i Parcel 31-028-24-14-0001 AT-B: Torrens Map Scale:l"=200 H. N ID: Print Date.6/1912014 • Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel 7200 France Ave S Tax Address: Edina,MN 55435 Total: Property Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished'AS IS"watt no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied,inducing fitness of any parlaular purpose,merchant-36,11y,,or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 3.51 acres Sale Area• 152,751 sq ft COde: COPYRJGHTID HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 • Tiheht Green! „ .. •• • - ' -•:-..-,•:•',---....-:::::---::.:-::---;-il::r..:'..-i.-.7.:.:2;,.:..7-::=:-..-'•-:7.,':-. ...,:::.:..:-.:•:',•...:-:-.-'.:.7 L;S:-.:L:z.:_.-:..: C.Z. 0 Ai I fq 60 cost WiP0 k• . '-. Mt:la-Italy 4 Middle Sc1t90 :E-._: ... ,• : •.:,.:,-z;...!..:4,::,__..........;;.....-.:i -: Legend ' Edina • \ . '...Cornrnunify \ • ••-•- • - • •• -. . • •••-• . .... .. -.- • i-----1 0.1 Sin&Dwelling Unit Dist. ._....--.. T Church nter 1,} ; t ..._i R-2 Double dwelling Unit Dist. i. ',; -.............. -:-:i.7.7.. ....•:: .. :'.....:::•,_::: £ . Cir.,Buildings 111M PRO-1 Planned Residence Dist. - r ....:: -. .,.t' •-"-- Irk- . ..-.7.---;7--..-.7-7-7--. . • ' -::--•,. . , Control • PRD-2 ,:: Private School . •-• ' ••'•-'-.... rControl : ::::-.'....:Y.-:.-:---•::-.: ::::-.:.....i:-.':::::v.- ....... • _ ... I I PRD-3 ".- ,... .::..:`,!•!.....: -,-- ; '' -• -.-. ' .......:-"..,::•, i Pomo school [7.., ,.....4 PRO-4 '. • ‘.' •.•-':::::-.::•-•”"";"::7:,-..--,-::,-".--:;:' '"'.:-•i-....:---;::•::.'...7::-: "....i PR.S .....:', • !.-- -7.: :;:-"4'.....--i1-2''.:.:,-;.:.:-..*-.,•:-..-.4':..:..:;1---.-.?•..4;•:!:::..:-.;•••: 11111.PC0.1 Planned Commercial Dist. ilwiral -, --:1:::-••,=Tii•-•,-;••:":F--z--""i-2;:::.::-1.:,7:.-•••:':----:,-7-: ::::::::::' e---------..:1 '.....::.:---K., -Li:::::. hOnt :. i'r1.-::''...Z..'-'--•--..-31'.":•.--7-:";:-.7 7:::-' .2..;..--.F.-::::..:.:F --... PC0.2 LILO-...-i ::...: •1,-.2".:...‘. i. '...-•...Z.:---7-.-•NP---i----.I' I 1 PCD, ......i,;.:: :.7,....i,f-:.:.. ......:-••:i Z.•...;.z.4.1 , ..,-.,-,--.-:-.%;....-_-_:....:._ ..,.ame .--•-_ _ „----..- r,.....1 .. _. --_-_-:::-. :7-..r.....T-:..-:,-,-___-:.._.:-- . - : •::.:.,--,-i::::..:...: ,••••••.---..''' : -417 71.•-i...... : . :• `• . :•• -,. , . '. :-...• :!... . at. cii,..E. :.: :• : :-. -PEI.'41.-:,-.:"..,... 1.,..:::::,:d 000 P°D4 I., E - PIO Planned Industrial Dist i: : : ':7:-::.:.....:::::,":'•••,:.. ': ,i ' --'-...':.•• :...:-...:.:-' .,:L.'. APD Automobile Perking Dist -.• " 5. '• -:i::-:-.:-. .::'-'''...-,-7 ••• i ....'.•.---ii--- f•67•-:•••' •.• ..k4a ‘••.•'‘•. • ..!.; ,.,.• ..-,........,-..... •••• ....Z..-.:----:.:.-i--•.-, ;''..:...," •---::.:: '2D:.-.7;::::17.-7:,...::: ...:. :--.',,-. . i.:.:':..•:-- 1:::::::1 EFILD Edina Heritage Landmark Dist. N ••• ....:• ..:..:.. .. ..‘:.. .:•:: ., --- 1 . I 0.400.4 Mixed Development Dist. VV E .'.. ... •- -- • - • ''•- -_.4,-.:•?.•-• -t 7: . ,. "'.••• ''''' ., "ir-TI IIIII -:----: -H4:-. ---- ...-...'"---- i'" 1 -•-•-•!..-^,i. :::,...`..--ii•:':'7.:•::' , S at&j,,,.., MODS Planning Dept • . ' 1.:::•....: 7' .7-''-.... ........_ ' Ei."Hc..:::'''',4- , . . .k '.: ..---7,:•.- November,2012 n - ....--7-. .., ''..*:',. ' • : .:.7 7-..•7'7----';'--.-=--—,J....,...'•.•.:'f.":.'..',..7:s''''...' -.. l'• ••'•', ----L-=-_- _. . 4.. --------- — ._., -.. .:- ' 5:----1; — ::-: .//:`////' •----- --. ... ...-*".:-4': .--•,..=-----..-1 _..T. ' . : ....:-r.'..'' '•'•;:::.--.7-.L::';": .''..:7'..:;'-'...:;:':::::„:.-::'::'›oe.4:':2'' '.;-..7.5.-',.. ''A'',.-.':....;.:'."-••; ----- --====.: - -..-: . .1.- Tr.: 722.-:::::::i....•:,..::. ..:/-• -.-::-::: -..--. ,. - : .. .... :.. . ........i... .........,;:-.....",:-..::::: . '... •'----r"--"- ---- -... ... ••••-- . • ' :........7.-,: .., 1: l'....1......• -...,,-..=:.:.,.,-. --::-. ..... ...;,............. . ... ...;:......L,;.... 1 4 1 .-•• k r,bAr.rilrls. . '•.. :: -• .7...::--::''':-7::-.;:-i' '::':..:..:..'..: -....:,-'-::" ''. •-• --'-.-.:77-..": : :: :: ::--- ....- __ . . . •• •.-.._,,_. • .• ........_ . . -.- ,-.-----..— ; ' -,77-.--,-;---------"•-• -•"-.---= 7-'-:'7 -:-7 -- .. ::-::-• -.::•.: .''.. :: ,,,:, ,',7, %':--•: '. N ...:7-,:_:.:.,..7...: !... ' = ..m.m. .. •'; Silt & -:'..:::.:•:.:' -.- ' il ' _-•-• 7,: -...•-::-;,7",••:-.1.--:--, ...... .._. ... . ..... ....... .. , .... ..•-•...' .•,• - ' ... '.: . tail* '.."17- = - ,.. ...........= , ....... ---....•- •..., .....,.- Schod III,=.••. ...M=.........."...1 - - . . . •. 'ONININIMII , • -...---....-...-. . .... ....... ....41:1!_. - - .... : .74•••:N' .. 70TH El FRANCE DE - . . ....7.- -,,-.:-:.•,..---,,...... ..,.--i:: -... . .:'-.-H:--.--::::-.i7-,;.- ' •---: .•-'1F ,------ - „. .._ • .„ ,--,.,--,...--. ."-:".''•'.-'••• '" '... •••.'.•.":''•'.. . "::.::.:''''.' ..:.1.r.T.PAL-0...1kOti ..-.1. --....-.....aii:;!:•::.:•• :.., ...,...• \'. :‘: '-';---'...-•:-'f...: ':'"'''.. -•••••••.-.11:::...:.-:. '---......''':-...7.:.:„;.',. '":";-•"`:,'":& ,-1. 01 — •„:„...„-:...,-,..:. : -..„:„,:_.-„..,,:, . . . -• Fire Itti , , , •:, *, :,..',•. ...,, ....;,..,.• .-s- ..L....-....„ ...:. . 7.-.',:".;- .-72..",-i'.:::.Z.::::',''.v - • . . . '.. . . ._ ., . ........ .. ... . _ ...,... . . , . . . ... .... .. ... . . .. ....-- , .........- - ' ' . .''.•-,,: -''... ....--. :::.: ,:: .....L....... . : ..... •:... : •:. .:... .. „.. :. ... 1 .m ..,::N. ....L.. VV: 70TH ST -..1 .-: ,..-,,,,,, _1- . . ._..,.. .., :. :::::::T;7...:11-----:.:::---:---:'"- " ::: . 4P'•;::;:7 -ii...-7- 1111 ,...,...,.:-..--_' -:":::.11:: ...1 ... i'''''Th''ic'' .•• ' .: Lake c-';•, *.*-: :1• '.• ''" '7:,;' :L.:... ' •: -. •_.•-=--i-----..i=•-••••4-:::',--4.:-::\.,--,-Miell- i''----:i''"-- • 4 4 j "----' ' - . . t di r \' --. •• - - •- 14..ZAINIte.E.;,,,:..::::-:-:owl .----. , „Is- . 'd •i• : ,E i a • „.:. ----.----.. ,"----;-2-,--:--:--1:.- , _....- --, w i..„.:1%1 tra:544;+:4,il I- a : .... w ‹ ... . ..„ . . ,. . , :>-Ir_•...10-1 a r:,Z:::::::::.,.',...- : ..:. ...:;'' 5 " ' -*.'• ,I,-:,-- . . '‘ tfr "1- :.‘, A al ,--- ---- = ,-, . : --._. . , ,..:..,, . ...... .:.. . ,. /.‘,...,..,:.. ._ ,.:.,: - ,...-:-._:-..--.;:,:?..f_.-..-,-(E:::- • 1.:::::.%7.7..F.• *•+Asl',. ...0,...,2 . .. , . . . :' " ' •' " ' MAVELLE D-, .• ,, . .. . .F.L.f.-....-7-_:..•;:,•---f ii FT1 • . , .,7 fr.i,o,'. -•'• ...:....: •- • ',. traggRi. 1 r ' WilMi , •.• #11 ,.:ft: • .,.. . t..-:-.4.-• •••••:41::.,•. :•..!,7,•,::.:: . . . . .. .. ,. . ... . . ,,,.... "......, • •.• .• ••:.:-;:-: .., %.:•:-• -----,.•••• --' • •••• . .......... . .•••-•••..111111111 1 f.. .-.:7•;:•••-.1- \ • -..---7;.---."-:-.',..::::-. ...• [ ' : • •-i,:.;••••••:....-.."::.',,::;,-;',.•,`,.."-,:•,,-:;';';',;,:i t,-.-4E;•: -i--IY:-:: , .... HAZELTON RD , :...".•;.:.7••:;:;:;:',.....f:-•;U:fi.::.: [ ..:•-- •,.. - -• -- , , --. • - 1 11111.1 Aa_ : • Legend LDR-Low Density Residential OR-Office Residerdial IME PM-Regional Medical WAR-Low Densm/Atlached Residentel ',0-06ce {//p' °OSP-Open Space and Parks MDR-Medium Dens*Resfdentlai _MXC-Mixed Use Conger P5P-PutillclSerrt-Peboc HOP-High Densly Residential CAC-CommonlyActwty Center fi LAM-LimitedAccess Highway -NC-Negheorhood Commercial -I-Industrial 1 8 ' 13-51 ' HDRw GM sl 4 n_.. 2 ti 12 65th 9t r'` f ?fi 35 " 1ZIsr( '; '- rO._ �.__- 4 2 12 (\* 3-5 OR C'-1C 14 it W 69r1r SI 1 12 101 `.1)- w7050 St 3 1 IA_ O g 0 1 2 3 " k2, ,_ Heiaht Limits 4 ( Laa i JJ 2 Stories:24` "" 11/4A ,-:; 3 Stories:36' 7",, a 4 Stories:48' G 5 Stories:60' 4 L 8 Stories:96' - 2 2 I 9 Stories:108' 1 10 Stories:120' Perk„„„Ava e 4 I HDR .-, Cl) 12 Stories:144' — 2 1 4 Stanclard Height HDR 9 2 a I Podium Height 4 11bIDR G 1W 76th St Z � I `—/ j� 12 µ H40R � i �. c wr7ln Sc —OR--A a n„eeo a Dr i' N Br 1 I_; , orriIric tori Future Land Use Plan with 1C/Il” City of Edina Building Heights 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Southeast Quadrant Figure 4.6B Data Source:URS 0 0 0.5 Miles A3y APOL Cktu T kit-kP CAMPBELL CAPITAL . .._..._......_... .._.... GROUP, LLC CAMPBELL CAPITAL GROUP. LLC .7-, a{i1&:"+lt111(.E, DI;I1'E; NI: • SuiT :360 • ' ','(i'.`+I I:tNt. . GA. Thum:E:6Th.-4h5.3672 \14 NUT! 1 1 le T 15;1)_t'133S August 31, 2016, 2016 Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: 7200 France Avenue South, Edina, MN Dear Cary, It is our pleasure to submit this Sketch Plan for the redevelopment of a 3.51 acre property (152,895 square feet) located at 7200 France Avenue South in the City of Edina. Project Summary The Project will include a 5 story building over 2 levels of parking. The Development will be comprised of approximately 241 apartments and two levels of podium parking including 385 parking spaces. This development will include 10% Affordable units. A TIF from the city will be needed to handle the oversized underground stormwater vault system required for this area. Existing Site Conditions The 3.51 acre site is currently occupied by an outdated office building. Project Site Layout The new building is to be located close to France Ave., in the same general position as the existing office building. It will take up approximately 2/3 of the overall site, allowing a full 1/3 of the site,on the west,to remain a stormwater control facility and open space. Open space shall be enhanced throughout the site by native plantings and be of appropriate scale and intensity, as well as screening and focusing views as is appropriate. The open space along both France and 72nd shall be enhanced to begin to set a framework for streetscapes along both streets. Direct vehicular connections to France Ave have been eliminated and the main entry area of the building, and !t L ingress and egress of the resident parking facility have been located off 72nd Street. Some appropriate island and turn lane striping and regulations have been shown along 72nd, as well. The existing screening along the western property line (adjacent to the existing residential property) shall generally be preserved and enhanced with additional native woodland plant material. Planting areas around the existing stormwater facility which do need to be removed to expand the pond shall receive additional plantings as well as boulder and wall structures to provide additional screening and interest in both form and function. Finally, the area along the west side of the building shall be a semi- public grassy open space with trails and specialty plantings to create a park-like setting. This area shall also be utilized as a trail connection corridor, running north (to 72nd) and south (to the adjacent property). It is the desire of the Owner to apply for, and utilize any available TIF funds to help provide this usable semi-public trail connection and open space, by expanding the existing stormwater facility, but also providing an underground stormwater facility component to achieve the necessary regional stormwater storage volumes that have traditionally collected here. If TIF funds are not available, an alternate plan for storm water control will be utilized, generally expanding and enhancing the existing open surface, rain garden style facility only. Height Final height to be determined upon completion of design drawings, but the current plan is for a total of 5 stories of residential over 2 stories of parking, with 6 stories exposed along France Ave and 72nd Street. Setback Current setbacks as shown on currently proposed design. France Ave: 31'-6" 72nd St.: 15'-0" At Existing Single Family(west) 180'-6" At Existing Adjacent Office Bldg(south) 19'-6" Civil Engineering Overall the goals of the grading for the site are to match adjacent grades as closely as possible, while still allowing a usable, flexible on-site experience. Grading in the existing pond area shall mainly consist of deepening the existing facility and generally expanding the pond volume to the east. Additionally, an underground chamber system shall be incorporated next to the pond for additional volume while still allowing usable, grassy open space at the surface. The existing site currently drains to a "land locked" drainage area and utilizes a pump to discharge stormwater to the adjacent, existing storm sewer system. The design of the proposed system will match existing discharge rates and flood volumes. AS The building shall require both water main and sanitary sewer connections appropriate to the number of new residential units. It is expected that these connections shall have to be made onto existing systems under either France Ave. or 72nd Street. Project Specifics Number of Units: Approx. 241 Units Land Area: 3.51 AC(152,895 SF) Location: 7200 France Ave S Density: 68.7 Units/AC Rental Sq. Ft.: 240,987 GSF Vehicle Parking: Approx. 385 spaces Avg. Sq. Ft. per Unit: 1,000 GSF Site Access: 72nd street Start Construction: Approx.July 2017 Type of Building: Residential Specifics The Project anticipates attracting a mix of residents including young professionals, empty nesters and active seniors. The Project will include a mix of unit types which will provide high-quality amenities, access to a primary multi-modal transportation corridor on France Avenue, and adjacency to the Greater Southdale Commercial District and Centennial Lakes Community Area. Unit Mix: 139 one-bedroom (57%) 81 two-bedroom (34%) 21 three-bedroom (9%) Apartment Features: Community Amenities: - Distinctive floors plans - On-site leasing office - Professionally designed interiors - Courtyard/plaza level pool (resident/guest only) - Nine foot ceilings - Park-like open space and trails - Electronic intrusion alarm system -State-of-the-art fitness room - Covered parking in a parking deck - Quartz or granite countertops - Upgraded appliances - In-unit washer and dryers - Private patio/balcony - High-end cabinetry package Project Team This is a joint effort between Campbell Capital Group, LLC and Atlantic Realty Partners Architect: Poole & Poole Architecture Civil Engineering: Civil Site Group Landscape Architecture: Civil Site Group Structural Engineering: Pierce Engineer, Inc. Mechanical Engineering: TBD Traffic Engineer: Spack Consulting Legal/Land Use Approvals: Peter J. Coyle—Larkin Hoffman Interior Designer: , TBD Campbell Capital Group, LLC was founded in 1999 specializing in all aspects of new multi-family developments. Campbell Capital Group, LLC has been involved in more than 7,500 apartment units representing in excess of $400 million in equity invested, in projects totaling over$1 billion in value. Michael J. Campbell is the Founder and Managing Member. ATLANTIC REALTY PARTNERS, is a private commercial real estate firm based in Atlanta, GA with a Regional office in Chicago, II. Formed in 1995 by Richard & Andrew Aaronson, the firm has been responsible for construction of over $1.5 billion of institutional quality developments, containing over 5,500 residential units. CIVIL SITE GROUP, Founded in 2009 by Matthew Pavek, PE and Patrick Sarver, PLA, Civil Site Group is a full service civil engineering, land planning and landscape architecture consulting company. Their focus is on innovative and cost effective design. Project types they have been involved in vary greatly and include multi-family residential, mixed-use developments, master planning, commercial and industrial site planning, parks and recreation planning, schools and education facilities, storm water management, municipal infrastructure and street design and engineering. Poole & Poole Architecture (2PA), LLC, located in Richmond, Virginia and Atlanta, Georgia, is an award winning, full service architectural firm specializing in multi-family developments, mixed-use projects, traditional neighborhood design (TND), single family homes and historic preservation and restoration. With more than 39 years of combined experience, founding Principals Michael R. Poole, AIA, NCARB and Nea May Poole, AIA are committed to quality architecture and superior client service. In closing, we look forward to working with the City throughout this process. Sincerely, 717/' 7-/7/(-d's" Michael J. Campbell Al .:- 1 F } yn S 1 M . • �,.yY4;74; #r •'<awl � . - !• „ � Y � � •# etc , t '' y. y ,f Vi4..' rttyR;, '• y� t, `4Nr moi =: 77EEAA £ aat , . . - sem°. .. .. ••• t ,•_ ,,_ _ ••••::. „„,, .• , ••• „•„;,., 1.,., ... .z..44..„,_,„'IV .. . .i.,---„..--..„..--:.::!,-.1.,.... ..,_ - `—. - gt+ ` "rte°'*` ''' #,.1 P ,rd Yah a $s�pppppp���. : .7,,i•.¢ i Y_ 11` • `1 1 'n s+ :0 _T • 7; s� I •-..” 101 11 �, • Es , AA d ti r• K .; '"^ i. -,,,.::...,:iiiis.,:. E/.WIi�A I I��li ;��I �_ 1 • a to : "t d ' T1 ! !RW p, L e. Iltl.�-21113.- - Il nll�t • �•� Rly��.s et - '_� M: d kI4V rr 411111 iiii MP '4 - i ' I . r � ° ` T vw. ��I 4 t r ' I 7-''''M E4 t---- -1 ..., . 1 , 1116 31 ':- --. , Z r 1 Jou P:,..4.0.,•ilir • ..: •...Erfe; , • 451 �.: ® '4 'r 1 .IO 11 - ;Aga- taint- ��s_ rar lilt,. t'F g l� 11tll�l Lain 71-71 �. SII gi .. `401 1 f 1 �� 1 a . -Ix ----Tr; .,...,, ,-_,.,,,A,, ,,,..„7„:„. :ea,VIWIrillrirtigiWri ,.' € ,' _ - - — - --0- - --T — — 3 `.,,. aAV a Uea FRANCE AVE SO. Y ...•rr-r,e:.... 4 - -_ Campbell Capital Group,LLC UP ‘1:ii,iiiii 100001101111 i 'mrM1111 M." 1 141 i 0.0111 li• 1 ---' rrw■r.� ■ ill ■C i ■■i r`0y 10t 1��� _�_-. --. — — r .r.islairiM � r o� f �e��IMn �■ ■ t, r��,, 1 yY. f® g:y . relrm .r r li " N s■' �� m■ ■r:, V�.ID'3� _ A■� r. ® i PO r ii MIMI 1.1111.00 — 11111.t�A4gp Misr 0Rw+ Mil. 116.'' r1g 1 II ,Cleft„ 1l �11r t A i J�� . ■ ■' ,■ti, i■■iif NM _1� n, � i �� lig 11 ,:ll 0 ■ ■■ WEN—— 0 �■ �� r� a. Wirt .�c�l lig 1111711 al.i ■�m..'�,> ■ ■11�y:®iIl lOr:. bi �� �Pi� .� '` ■a. �� � a■I�r IIan rte■EMI M■MEM NEM ■■; ;rant■ rrmi r■ EEEE nolm"== == rrrr:lam iiimi mg.MOM MIN MIN MN■� ,:ii■ ' ,,�i r .�� ata == Imre■——win='r RIM�■ENE■� rtr _ .,, , ► 111E mow 'i�rr 2 0.m.• E• 1U f Fill. tp 14 iiir3$lii �� MEM r.,_. . ., mi , _.............. ....., _:#I y — rs m ��'SL. ----MI aw.�- s: . 04111111 - -�_ `='-ter *~ .: t AL W W.72nd Street su OQ LL OW.72nd Street Perspective No m s oia:my:o-an` re oe�ave I\ \I Edina, Minnesota 2PA August 31,2016-A3.Ob 02016 Poole&Poole Architecture,LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 SHRUBS PERENNIALS TREES 11 s i..: z. Medora JuniperKarl foerste Gross Dakota Pinnacle Birch ili I 4171.1,1?S, ill Winnipeg Parks Pose 424k Sparc vs . Renege enghsN Oak Russ=Sage ��s' {+ NATURAL BOULDER— RETAINING WALLS _ Pardon Mc Day11y _''-4 "3unburst Honeylocust 4 �, PROPOSED BUILDING TERRACED NATIVE— - PLANTING GARDENS C. a NATIVE WETLAND OVERLOOK Puvla Meadowbnte Coneflower " fir; Princeton Sentry Ginkgo PROPERTY LINE I __ kg \\\ ENHANCED WETLAND/RAIN GARDEN— I I WITH NATIVE PLANTINGS 3 firi.•,,. : — 8SEMI-PUBLIC LAWN SPACEED Lttle T trll C.'+tmme BTRAILSYSTEM I,lorthorn Redb d 45 i • .`i:/..-:;,,.-. '..,.-u .t n t '�Y' A .... `:inions m Pied Astilbe 8..)..t. M ''s� ,y qry P 1 i I Tina Plow•erong Crabapple 4.'"0 „ 4 "a«, Ny,gs I _. Er a — ., , ,, • ' ' ' ' 4'” ' ' ''gil' .' ' ' I, . ,,, ,..„,_._, ir , ,,_ .,. , . , ..,,,...,.,„ di L,„,' ,,,.... �•^•13 t .'1i ,„kj, . 65 -^ cri I I I UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 7200 FRANCE SITE SECTION CUT l'�'4 r-; 4991 w.35TR sr„erzoo Project Number 16103 Rovivon Number. . 1 V 6 Li.11.1t, �� ST.l502 0ARN MN 5394 J. 952X42 G ro4p cum G R 0 U P wvnv,CMl9ileGroup.pxn qMw DMB: 06/31/2016 Revision Date: . L SHRUBS PERENNIALS T- ES Atedora Jumper Ladroenter Grass tit Dakota PNwcie Birch lit F 1 rr 1 Wrm9peg Parks Pose tattle 5P.r. A n' .'X1R=, heritage English Oak Russian Sage , x41111 NATURAL SOULDER— RETAINING WALLS ,a Pardon Me Dayhly J+tw.v ;3unburat honeylocuat TERRACED NATIVE— PROPOSED BUILDING PLANTING GARDENS PROPERTY LINE NATIVE WETLAND OVERLOOK PMIe Meadonbrite Conefiaver Princeton:Sentry Ginhgo ENHANCED WETLAND/RAIN GARDEN— p= WITH NATIVE PLANTINGS SEM4PUBLIC LAWN SPACE 1 L. x &TRAIL SYSTEM tette Titrh Catmint `-'= iJarthem Redbud . .�: � r r I„rr a^jiY Ail„,.....k, '�'t /,, ' �w leA4tk *1W 3„r' y 55•.. Vnwns m P,ed AstilbeIII o` A +a # � A ?7W Tina Plewenng Crabapple tir' '� p w� ,'4A''....,.<4, t,l s sµ ,. apt ' t c:, � C ,,. t' rioi, _Ir- v !r Miliii _ _ _ .X��t'{{- k YA.,:^ �r1i"- e1,y 4.r11A ';Sa`•4.tAi•� �� I 1 I UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 7200 FRANCE 4471W.STH8T„M 5 SITE SECTION CUT .�` 4....e'it ti,N...., 6T.lWI6PMK,AW fi83t6 PaAeot Nunbar; 16103 Revision Number. 8522603007/787,219794 • G f-t 0 V P f%f%GOWIS1t6Group.o0m 19446 D616: 08/31/2016 RRvl9bn 0616: I! 1, Campbell Capital Group,LLC - , ...1 slag SI% 111,Iii°Will-Illi'lki%4% ' ills 111111011111.111 ki 1;1' : 11111.1111111111111111 biliiiiiii1 Inknr.citt. oilligi all ---.-.- 411' 04''.•;'-i.',14 1. 101000 mom. - - .. 1 tilvii.,1H , I Liu 000101•11111—rill iii-"40.111c,:, -: _ ii 1 .:;, I , ii 'llr' . killl- i 00011111181111•0Sioviteigillik illiVol .1,,..N it l'Illitf101i It il h 0.3_,/,, 000 ti.MIMI iiirciiifilitiniiiiii:1,4.st:VI, II :II!01;1: 1: :16:1 Ili; 1 FE Lirill.1101.010.001=1116.011 IllonguitTen....11,AliAlt tialti4,:'1( umot tIlitu!,,k,o; i, ,i, ,..:yi.,,, Irwin ?..!!!'1"91111.. , ill ,,i r i II, 1 • rn im...4.070.......airtip'-'10rd rierelliuri-.1.1' ill 1 m"rf:4111 Is' 1111141 ilLs"',. mum%-0.1.1--- klimalauttiiii .0"--_,-T il ii lai ,-a-g„igirm IF 21 I. ..-,,,,,. 1 Cikil A 1 wieLITI.R, _••••_,_ I t, , 141Liti:: !"..111LIMMOirirr' if lip 51 II Ill ine H 11 - -- Ifingin cal IIIMINIIIIIMIL AMU hitu,- ' 1 II IIIE li 111' ill.iii.v. rE, ileilliPP 9 V, ii ',1,11, il IiiiscrivA !It'll!" ,:".• ,t.-.5-2:• '...nem. 111111MINE IMO" _ . Mutt ur,pao •, Al , , UM&,.'A 15 , ,,. • - Mill iti,',; '1 ED ''',....'Mil I EMI.NE 111111 mom nom lt Irmo •,,, In ti us,,,„„,,,- ,..,. .:-.:. r 0-P-0-217;iiiiiu , !I 1 VI II I: 11 11 I LLI , -,.. momim•• momm UM 11 mai III" Ulla mut in 1.11111;--1 NE i Emirim4,11 az IM til Va Ri ni ir Nu'Nig , wouniiirmo,@MOM' ...Al,'• , . .. Nov %a " '— • m-mown . , ' ommin mu wie ' lir . ir: • um 1.1r . AT 51 1, 101 4 51 I t. I 11.1.. JP Immo ge. •lidi lam •r 11111, _ —-- xf,•t-r-v-`-'- '''Li-f_"___K._._ IL__ I' '- • -- . . , - rielAimict , 10,7____::?____N;.-.... 1 ..-,--,..,.. -.-.. -..-' -' • ._,-. __..„,_._,.. ...._.._, ...•• 1 - fa :.,..„„....,.. .'-'- '''..-"-- •". . .„... . .......* ---- Y................ W.72nd Street 431 ip 'C U N 0 W.72nd Street Perspective Ilk Not To Scot.Ilicotive Perspectoe VI/ 2PA Edina,Minnesota August 31,2016-A3.0a 0 2016 Poole&Poole Architecture,LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group, LLC 1111111...._1111mumill. imam h. ' t __...1. NI �.. II iiiimMMMM �I �' ��'��1 ��..< ■■� , ■ .�I1 z ■ ■ HA iu i ® Ni i�"iI!e rtiabilli timincil I t ! ! ei rip ■ ■ mi.—sungit EN E ■ ��t® TG i® .• _���® �■� .I. 111 ■■ L _L���� 1 .,a� _ d17� 1ale lin _ • ■ uih 1,..lam% ■ ■ ■ r I' m ii 111 �j55 il �] Q m mr . 1111 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ p ■ L1 rr. m�� ill ■ '?�!@Ill �' i �rr MIIIIINIMMiiiiii • t d ------------ W.72nd Street > lI ) U< Q OFrance Avenue Perspective 114 Q Not io scale:tllostrative Gertpective Edina,Minnesota 214iAugust 31,2016-A3.0c 02016 Poole&Poole Architecture,LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group,LLC re mi 1.1 as== I In r„„th,,,,,fss .... IIP11:111.11 H gg 1: :1 , gg 1: :1 , IN H 1 111111111111 11 11 1: :1 /l ,. 1: :1 1g 1: # :: -�g a■ 1itit '_ _- C�� r_r.�l- liiGl®L�ili■ru_ ".�:P�■I :i ..:Jr!•I:_�, i1ItAL.�1 ��;3 E1r' rrinEi g I I■■ MII :: 11 1= :1 11 1: :1 51 1: 11 11 1: :: _ 1, ■T■ 1- � �w■►i- LANAI ,c ■�I ■i ■■l_a _■r ®ice imp ■l 1I :: : �,,1.1 : : 1l. : : 11 ■ ■■ _ 1 ■T■■7,1 —WiN3 tJ!<tA iIL — MNL.i !`:J■eL 7 ■ ■■ ,�— iq1 eN ® :m 11 a1: : 11 : : I1 : : 1► i G 'Mill� _MIME cIarwrw f ,-_ 1 ,�.�1 1 1 e. 1 1 �1� L 1l _ ' IM.IN.El :1 IF :: :1 g F-Mm 1: :1 H 1: :1 1-41111 1: :: imim- __l _ W.72nd Street Q U Ali MP O France Avenue Elevation Vd I\ 1 soie:vzo.._i,u. eeonoo \I Edina,Minnesota August 31,2016-A3.1A' 0 2016 Poole&Poole Architecture,LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group, LLC 1 Inl11� ' ■ 51 H U l► ■ ■ 1q ■ .■w. Ili MG ®®wlww mil Edi _ —_l r., !mom 11•11111111111111111•11111111111- ®i' oma,-- '■'!i!! i' iI PI II iI 1� 1i it �! H H 11 1I �0 iI 5� Ii 'iI �� III I �► Ii iii ion 11 iii min 1 — zammun H - -wlRi��r�S7 �l"�91Aii® _I�7�I Illi Ill - ��i un iii 11► :I 2I Ii iI I►` Ii iI 1► Ii 0 ®I ...• . ...0 . _JQ>.L__ l l l o gL i I �� 11 WMBB 111111�e...,...,.. _wNMI MEM www MEM �www:,♦■tlNM I •a! H ii 11 —� www-w=Immo "IF-—�_M-■�w�: p'■mow: __ mm, A3.2 W.72nd Street Eu O W.72nd Street Elevation 1)1 Scale:I/20"=1'-0" Hevafion Edina, 111 WM zam2 14) August 31,2016-A3.2 ©2016 Poole&Poole Architecture,LLC-3736 W interfield Road.Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 h. Campbell Capital Group,LLC 1.-e=. . . TiJiiI Ill, !_I:_" 1_I:_ 1`_I._ 1_I._ ' SII-- FR fl : n Magi n I Ea ME- was" n 1 EMME R1 I 911;/i! m 1 , :1 IN. 1: :: iiiiiiiim err n MAIN n bird I I WIEN I n M I LI , FIR 1 :1 1► I. :: ry- I I= FTl 1 .. R1 i-i:_ -( ®"-I=- Fn o_1:- Fr -1 !=- Fr - :1 !► 1- -- , 1�,Ili �-UlIli l!� °-1 H =ISIFR ,M FIR (1� :C 1' - 1- - 1' -LIma 1' - 1 --- :1 1► 1: :: .ti 1 -' Fr ®M hit _. Fr -I -I ' 1 Fri ' FT1 -- F� :1 H H W.72nd Street WV© l 1 LL J U (:-.D West Elevation N xam:vzm=ra ne omo \/ Edina, Minnesota August 31,2016-A3.3 21) ©2016 Poole&Poole Architecture.LLC-3736 W interfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225 0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group,LLC T ■!■} F1711 ■!■ 11 H 11 H H H H 11 H : 1`� H H + 9•■■ ■i■ 1 1-:. ■'.' 11.. i■ ■11 11 I. ■i 11 _ u■ ■� �■ - ■■ ■I■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ 11 ■ --I I. it LI® IA�I _ ■ R. 21 1:} ■■ 11 ■'� 11 '■ ■' 11 1■ . ■i /1 '■ ■' 11 I■ _ ■�■ ■I■ - ■■ ■ ■ ■ - ■ ■ . I-. ..1 , �i■marr mil .. it a ■ ■ ■ ■�■ cild■ ■I■ ,1 ■' 21 ■ ■ 10 H : 11 r :IN MI 1► �: ■j■ ■I■ ®1, 1 ■;■ 11� _ I -ter W.72nd Street naU Q OSouth Elevation 1 gek mow.iizo=r eE Edina, Minnesota August 31,2016-A3.4 2PA ©2016 Poole&Poole Architecture,LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 moi„ �v 1:3 oE T, 5R d4 v f O 5 • O 0 `o. c m �+ d$ cf o Wa U r<:( a .**r F a a 4 = Mir iii iWI I/VI 111 OM INMArd.. sfai :a ■ ' aw 1�4iDIMI � _ 14gB ,10111 min mia 12 J 2b1 ,"`g. • LL e - U � a 0 a 0 U ca a �< E cfr a II ;A\ ., .... ‘141/ ,,. r Fy 1 k 41 /—�. --TAW AV-" ammo N -NW 1 :-- �t —Ilk-. _&01i,44141110,,,ia0x1ima .4, AIR, Bax mr� =.a �MIN� aax lal 1�1m F.,:il2 • i.. re, z.7I�II E,xR p..w.,. Sct:Rg �mr..� ' © 1 — N N D 1H 1N- E © • I .14 il B ! 4 111 ' in 111 - 3. GI ;III a lyl:lMOM $ 47 11 - ,_ �+If m I Lril ��� MLA) - Iii 2 % - _ Ili _.:,'I IO • a /��l� l ii < 0 I r11- '" axa,r� m ! !I� %'/; ow = moll r !4P fl Wri; "'Ai' I � ri 1 I La xa It4i l. © F '4 "mums' ESI Emir .1447.ve --t1'111111U1 ins A � H-77 IIS q- 17•-H H HN p 1 „ CX N Y Y /.11rd " .1 c.lI I I Ai i 8g € 0 8 n i ti 3 1 5 i 0 a`s U .c' . a V, II I (.) 10 9 . 1 Zz, 1 1 9 ...q' 'OS JAV 33NVIIJ .., _ 2 i 41116._4116. ANIL AL. Ailk_Alk Allik 411•1. Air ------, ,reammakmataw -amMa- iNiaramwmaximmormsrazoirasNamos hi dv. mmeirommraw 1,111rg," Mil C.' CP° 0 CCP V II) a OWO OCP • 01 0 0 d eto 00 IP 1111 .1 MI s I., 111 eil '4 MI iFll 41140 . . .... , i , ... ... i 0., ,..-- P 1 f aiillf -':.E 1 01 1 ll1 114 6 g 5,,E • ,.- bOE GUM .111 —oiean 411 i 1 1.w 1917.4 Kim ; iel . V . lifir :117 • .zz___, IMI Wily i MO `" 1111 MINI i 110 milr 1 Oki, 1- ... „„, _i il li P g 7 ItIli i0 1 k b' 1 A-00 !II 1 ill mi BE aro 1 II r asano si 03S0d0016,? AMBIL 2.0..._ a. Ali ....-.N ill il t LIMITAIIIIMILIFINI ,etwilvs. tr"" III") ponst•liViwro-• yel—riparALNE110011.11A11,--1 - - y•Pg 414.:1\c‘b,,, g 1 11 ii— -44 ir C IL,--, 2 ore 16,.# 11 tyanilik , li Lii Ask,u9440 ,-,„, _ 102 liriel1/4 • , 1110 la - A ilk .,y,,H5.2 1 si il - I. 1 it waropi7„ ve-f -,_.7,,L --....... ! , I r elm- . -4- --k___----we, !I I ! rook R ,-2A:q , .___. — • TO ..... .. 4111 1c .. -.0.„ • I IV 4 .,.. ,,,,A a via• --=_. ,----- „,r --------aoall eillig''' d ,o Al -16”" NOW - - low • 1 - 1.1 .4 .. .... ..› P -iiii ) . 41111 , .:a 4' t 111.1 • it 1, 1' 6 , ' 1..'''..----:., . x .. L +� 3 - „- 14,7,,. ..41.4r'',41,',1"...' »� " *rt'�,.0 h�1 7- Y -� 1.i,, + ie�...+ ` r/ Ili k 1 «r _E .'„' ,qk .; Z. '..Z ,--;-` ------i - - ' '`..1 ---"i - i . 1 VAt: . .t I v .ogm K� 7 . „ EZE ll 1 El 1 MP t_.... Mg 16 t 111 aqii4 . - -' ''' - '''' , 4 4 — --1 i/.Gii�1f, ii......, hl�Il hill. at , II m' .m ° IIS - � m IIAl-l�,m .: pjg ' aj ;IITi4 k”` '' - I ' 1 civa 0 fft*---: t an siii ir,. I II g ii El 1 ir mit! r.�n71 . ;, V. �� t; r... ,,, .: ate. za zo ze ,r.,,,..;p. d'} • ;. - : 1- : . -Am .,irl it- 1 r mE ' � v S ' xru-r /'//. , 7 � ":-,as� ; z4Pi• •9:....,,. , ''' -kp_ ri „,,,t, 1 h�s1 lit fe: J II 11 �? � 6 • 11.1! _- :,„.,,-.,--;.: :iii. Ili 1 :„��t. --41-11,1P-11”. w- Cr '41141111r all L �I► =!Till•�fi a► :...,,„„,„::. , ,,,,,, -,,,,,I, ISI�� - �'r.IIIK::' i�� ti�llr'1'� :lila.at.... � •� � ii1 ii tui1 mil ti� i1 iii ti►.= � '� ! ,111111 �i m77 i ll 1 ! ! 7..I,-.,--117,„ 6-41.14111,;711-3,...74.., 71,;4,-Mr-111 . - ' ':.;'...,'.1.'"'''';' '''':,'".••:':-.*;',;44 f4;;' ..,:- aAN c U e.. FRANCE AVE S0. - ti:� 'dq. Gi`IIfr;nLfi . , k . , 1i i • Z HO itA,a Y F ‘)..\.‘yet j t it* f i _ c < , 34 a '%' Yf X fit �t r. , ,$ ••I.1'-+ f 'V.-. %i ). ' t �..;3"+ V../ SP .g., *yrs ',. ;-:rr. .11,'r r $...::- .• .)I, ,....4.::.:-'44.. 'Ilk' V- ,','.:',7, r, :• 7*,.' i�1 f jib Fj •::.&•:47'.1- j !; iti r k' fi • >� '..I 1 II I.r.,':::- 'I:VP::-.". ,' I r ,p.y.r ..,. % ,,„-tctie* --;:* .,. ..... ., 4 ., .,,„...._..., .0 , ,, , I F. '1, I �'S tiii r.? ..... � M',,, 1/..3 ,I � ',\',..:'-`4:77-,.yetr ' Li..„.... ver ._ . 4 . ; 3 , 4� ye' r ls'J�?�' \-1-IAA'. #-:��. y► -,.a...;,--%!.� + ,----.?.....t a 4-i k l re cli- -�.+ 1 . .. --4 ...,;,: l., ` g far �70C i' �I �lp`�l� -. D a(-)L- cc ',1'..',,%..'i-P.I J 1 i,i 1.j1 (} 4 Y n -e,* #: l�‘• ISS' ` V,.-ri1 h{, g5 -1 ' tft t Type L`� f �.;Jr--'2—•T`n' J ▪ i A,.. ! "L ' -11''',4 , ;f.. �i S' `r/ ,,' LLI . j I'1'..`".t Itr, VI!, III\ i. 44'1•-•74.A.:: '''-' - P ' - .'"IfT. ,..'i 4I'Il'-.IVr,N,. ..--f:Tr--" I.•. Alfa' . . ' W' !:,1 .-W" 4; \_,t • j+ 7 �.: i'. ,.,1 , ,;•••,,2•4, *` * i4#1-?;(1:., F I o 'a • `�- [b 71 ,' ' , ti),4it -c- -.,•:: :1,•:-..-4;7;c4.'-i-&-.4 ' '•', , . ';''''' .. „ ' t. 0 e t W f y R* Sc II1 J ' s' . �'. �i -'"'''''''.-V-• �1 '. f� I" Cly i' d 1i, li I W .. t�KtibYti4"\ x s st. - Z 4.\� i1. - / ! /..,!.' r/if( -1,:- i %L { e tz Z 4603 LOCAL _ +NI .111111 72ND STREET '44611" ...rrli t----n 1 r.- 1 RESIDENTIAL Ii - ,•-•- - -7,•••.,"'• •-•--:" IrViiir;;;;;r10"; .. .' ' "-.!,-,.-1---z---7, livo COMMERCIAL ,•_—_.:-.„Ii".•,4"_;''''''.- --(r. ,..,', nn"N` .) .....=-. .L... . - -- . ,,_,....„,?.:4-:*..,,,e;,,le•----'7'(,' --- ....,„5,1 ..00.- .----;......... r i RAMP TO PARKING 1-- ', r------i-i' '--!--70•-?''-rr';,-,.;40-"t P7•1PiY, '71.:77-r,P7,_ -7' ' ' L-ad -17,---7--(13,... •q-a,-.--,,,K.-a_41--.--i_______---0--_,--J---L-i- -2\-- -----, ni 7,,r,1: ',14g, -----, 4,',4-6-:.;;LI-----747.7,-.2... 4(4 .. -'-'71.',".;-•,,":.",,n . 1 . -....".,`-:;:i771`1--4S",:-.44)--1*--:'-'17-s----±:77-27.7-'-‘ 7 :-I.-" --.' '117:1 ...I ,n1iLuii,11.4,1ad ;:r.-$::'-i,•*44- .'s' 'I:- -win--' ,'--.1.-' ' ,* ' t i ; ....!'; " $ .---;-,- ..;:16.. ,,, ,:-- --.-LL— 1-_,-.1.:.--- , 1 r , , ;-.......:.: '... 54% 4 •-. ir:- pi •;- , ••-1 ; ..-,"' .,';,.,sotjtv:w ; ., .- ,, -..:-..?=. .- ! .! ...J, ,- .,-4 Ili . . - ''' - ' -----:--- •i'.' , f' -..._-,- .....-1.1 ., l' 1 I 1 ,. ' .".:-% 1..tl, UPPER FLOORS SET - 14 ;-,-;:s4a- •...pi ; I 3 . 4-4'4' -,. . --,:t.,;.... --...--:.: it i BACK 10 FEET 1 , . ,,•v,W, . 41 ' --4--• ' ,-:-..n--4--- --- ' " ''' .'' "- —. •- ' 1 - ". -111,' • il 11 1 al .... - -,,,1-,.... i n kr..-..;. . .111,411 •I-•,.,-. ' , •• ,.,-1 I ,••,,-.1' .-:, ,, . :iv. •,•-•.*,, ,..,$. , ..,—$.1;-.0 ir-- --•'''''.••• 1-c-1-7-11?- "---'''- -r- • i! (.. ....+6 1 ailaiif'IA?'#-""'`"::+" -1-4r . -A-7' LEL t SERVICE 1 II 7;••!Is' I t •; 41.4H.5-0,2-..,iti:it_,‘!,.7.,.6•;.„...:.,17,7... 11,1:2tit' PARKING SERVICE LI 7:1-41;.1. fr _,..._)....1/4 , 1... o^. \ I • „ 11 .` '' .... ..- • ' ''-- r'..1.-.-. 4'1".:,. •"t.•' .1 -,v \ t, . • ii r.' 3 1 I r A I r C ?Xl [ RESIDENTIAL ••,'"ni,....n. .!,'• -i 1 .. I ' ) k.-it;.• LAA ,..,- .., •-/...,* !-- •• ,tT,... I I*1 ta_l ri :---•1 "--_, ! 1 LLI I, 1 • `i fr-'I..., .'!-. ,. ifili-•;,._ .2 ::11:. i,--t. ._ . . 4 • , 4 4., ,_.. • se . iay, j'f-Y-1, - I I ROW HOUSE 7 ''-V ...•.1,..,;! • A,„.•, + "71, ,..2 „ • 1 STYLE i kg ' --, ',L-- ' '4;-*Fe, !I. , • '7".-, ..- '':.-", . an \ - , -.::1-LT i g 11..„, 1 i,,.-..,-.•.. ,:,...f;,. 1-- . •P'-1, -, -I ____:1 •+--:' '4'' • . . • • ' '1!;;' 0:..- I;:, 1 a -i.ict, - 1 - —•:‘,...."- 1 ' ! ( :=$. • - • , , .,. • , , • . ---. •,,- ---, , , . ,v-,. ... • ,. . ry . ' IIIIIr: --:"'-:-''.. ..• ''' .- - ii,; ,, 4-1 ., ,_ . . _ _ I -, „:' . 4/I,. ,4 • r ' ' WIP- li' • " ilk A . -. 2'..' . ' d • 4. --. 17''1-,,. I 11. •. !I ; VALET --1C- i •_.4.4' ' I '-1., .t '..,", - -''.. --7(.J..n. ; ._.,1 ,-?,'I-41' .' ., '- .,..r 1,-.k.,, ' -.16kit', 1,' 11 i ' II 1 •. '',.. 0,.0.„,i, •;,,Y...0.0;,_,.„/.1.4,------1-1-Tri II i I • .:%1„V.. im _ ,.. .,, , _, ,•rrtf I i i ', : •-,.• •,;4; I ' RESIDENTIAL I \ .1..., . , ,—,I,„'-_ ' -.1 - II,...-. . ..,,t\• • , 4,/tt 4• ''''' • i NI i RESTAURANT i „ . 11 , • 1 ,1" VI--1 RESIDENTIAL! LOBBY RESIDENT!,L --- MI la_ UNITS 1r- I UNITS OR RETAIL I ___L. : t rf ; 1 II ,\I 1,1, • I il, • 1 4://..Ke e. - ,,,,,,,••• ! I \ •' 1 1 1 ' :'!".',-...,,' •".,,,,,, . 1 , , - . ., . .,. ,,,..• I 7-----'-'4,___—.1 .., RESIDENTIAL - ' 44..•"Alp. .,„. f-- RAMP TO 1 GARDEN AREA ! ."' •----.),It% , -.'„* :•i", LPARKING • :ft .1144r-t4-4. "e-4---••,4•...4.,..-,,w,-- . ,. . .....2..,..,...„,.., -.... • II . _ • —...-...... - \ II : . 1( \--'''.,.! NHH PROPERTIES DJ R F DESIGN : BUILD : MANAGE 1110ISCLAIR ARCHITECTURE INC :c 0 5 P OR AT 10H Cary Teague From: Sarah Crouch <sarah.crouch@archfieldoffice.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 12:24 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Mic Johnson Subject: RE: 7200 France Hi Cary, Some comments are below. I hope they are helpful. Please let us know if you have questions. Thanks!! Sarah Elevations do not seem to reflect the project description as outlined in the narrative. The narrative indicates this is a 4 story building over one level of on-grade parking and one level of below grade parking but the elevations show a 6 story building. Nor do the elevations and renderings seem to accurately reflect the grading and topography of the site. This seems like a model of another project saved onto the site. If this is indeed proposed to be a 6 story building,the building needs to step back above the 4th floor on the 72nd street side and facing the residential neighborhoods- no 6 story walls. The plan does not adhere to our desired 50' setback along France and 30' setback along 72nd. The sidewalk needs to be buffered by extensive landscaping (30' on France and 15' on 72nd). The elevations show solid walls at the west and south.The pattern of windows should go all the way to grade.This strategy would eliminate the large expanses of blank walls and could potentially add light and ventilation to the parking areas. Why are amenity/retail spaces located on 72nd rather than on France? As a residential street, 72nd would be a better location for ground level housing units. Parking should not front on major streets. On this property, the parking should be accessed via a new entry drive on the west side of the building, not on 72nd. This is the low side of the site, so could potentially be a below-grade entry rather than an at grade entry. In general, there should be one point of access serving parking entry and exiting.This a safer and more pedestrian friendly solution. Service and trash should not be accessed via a major street. It should also be moved to west side for more effective screening. With parking access moved to the west side of the building,the building's main entry could potentially be at the northwest corner rather than in the middle of the block. Consider putting water retention tanks under the building-that would create better flexibility on the site. Original Message From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague@EdinaMN.gov] 1 le -lc: BROOKSIDE CONDOMINIUM EDINA, MINNESOTA 1 1 1 I yEo, '5° NAP �° CaPyr,ah, zo,so,AP �� C )�° =I =I MI MI MI MI 11= IOW MN Mil MI NMI 03 e 0 O • id tA d ; ` � � Z ..._L_... .. , x. t 44.48 A 14°4' 1116 O . 3telt s ='mow ' v „ '�` y... . awe+. 0 � � •i �f ..ye.e rr „,,,,, ,,03 ,- v, i IL. i, m l'"*. all' v, „,,,,,,. 4,,,,,,'"4: , ,ri , 4:.,-.''''. '67.•:- , ,. ,'-**:,.., ' O. 3 4 "' My �i t 1 an x s r' Ze .w 19 '�,t d' r - +�,. F • ..� i t' •., rw, n • t" a s may. t . i yy a: of/ .: de." a! 411A, , it 1:' , -.. ‘.''‘ ' -gym,., u _ . .�* _ Al... it a � ' Ax ec A .^ ALr1 `` y l/\ 5tA s ; tF a 'e r .4:4400* ,>t � �+ O - � taw N'd i BROOKSIDE AVE ,^ F w i.....1„..1....\--2:1a ._ ' `` Minneapolis Northfield and Southern Railroad ;, .; 4 ,_ e'. , 4 ye,. -- _ . , „ co r r 1 a. N �.ei t ; r �y� et ' tea, a. ARCADIA AVE " 1 = r.' '.1. n°:ii*:-4i ''' , . . :t.,`' 4,,..... �► J tr,f, 4• _3.0\ *** .',,,F , , , 4 4 . 1 - X a r • T,k a - I •-, ', k ST TE , . HWY 100 x rk r . .. ", _ �.& .:��` +"fin .+"4 4., '., &... ,. - -=`t+' ' ' s• ok, ::%1„,,-:::: a. xY # at .� . '''.4..:..... ,2i, „ -...• '-. ' _A" .t fost'i: n d y y ki ax -, Xa t +x`. x 4 ` Y "49,R14ii i� br y„ o4 • o #�y ,w b J `,,q'ii 7 v. 4t 446 -* 4 i . if ..4.14# . a e7 . -::*"..t* . $ x k N E 1 1 1111 Ii I . l I J _________/ TREES LEIIEMQ N - __.---- 1\\ 275'0" / ��' DIAP I ' ' ; i 4TH STREET, �z ��0� , I • 4' PI '4. i i ie I / / ' TF / - 36'-On \ EXISTING DAN IONEBCU ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS - - I: ` OLLEC • 1 + TRASH COLLECTION WOODED AREA SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA I _ �.., .� �-� .: PARKING M ARCHITECTURE lr�t��l 923'6" � ��9 $' I �� ��\•��I■w�� �� 931 URBAN DESIGN r� yaw\ 25'-0 INTERIOR DESIGN J///i , //;7- 'G�' ®��' �,1k.1::0?_ ;, ® 1931 IHISTORIC REHABILITATION 1 I> / / a I —'im-msnIm ', ,•, \ .i •'— l.: • I .? ,' .. III `-_ /�932 - wwwDuP.coel CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT // ,/'/ 923 //// _ 1:: `33 /�////% - .' :I1 ' -___- DECIDUOUS TREE ` _/ C) � a.'-, /%///� !•' II 1611 BOREL PLACE,k230,SPN MATEO,CA 94402 (// �' i - /,,, - /,�, s 9•`"` ./j%//.;� f// // 7j o/�/i% % /{�� TEL.:(650)570-6661 FAX.:(650)570.6Sw1 ,j='/, � I Ny / j/• ,"i Y,%'L�i71 . \!1}06v.:% �%%m q% ''Sj R9 �I j .i/j% �i� I 8 %j j j%/'-c,-n1© �,, 0 iWYes,,%„!� ,�%�//� ..,�_ i l��l' ,/J M «j //�/ :'!STING HOUSEow j� �,r ,n jj/j/ fir\ /� •• GAT :>I R00j�. I gigl //, %jj///% ` /• \ (4,,,..V_, " o � / �/� the m d the ArcNled and not, ' M « %�1 11924 I /j/ •,� `���� j /'/ %/'j j� �®i�� Tr�sa ns 5 property _ // ?a• 4 •• \ p I I GA .• �r \ be re aced or used without his widen permission. 9 i. �, I �,� EXISTING Planners 1 ,'// ,/ t � J T.; j- Dan imesa Architects 6 'ME / /1,;/ ( �� Mil VII �� l� � CONIFEROUS TREE ©cowriahc zoos ov,P ��I. IIIIIN / PRO DE f IC.,//i, >„/i %/ 1 r// a,.. ., / _ _ '• /� /nillIl //,_ _ 1 ,..4 0 1 1 al / /%%f% %� TREES TO BE REMOVED F IlMir----,. , ,, BROOKSIDE — -F). — 9 • 1 / IN�26 1 T uaDHill , � �,% /�/!i?% s uI�Drip / CONDOMINIUMS /% i%j //. /��///viii//!:/ . — as //:✓ in i, / ,. A. / / // r/ I r // a/ r % % // /4 r,r//// I+�.1 _ I� - / A PROPOSED TREES —_ 927' /:;.j 7 i j j r j .,,,/, y • IL . 27 % / — �,% 92 / ,//G,%// % % .,�/��� _ tl a TRASH. / ,7— q ”-71, iv,-;_._ //// / // ROOM / / �� ,!' i/moi, % /� % iiiii - j i /:,./ /. 1 / / / // LOCATION 1 — 928 / •• S%% , , > // // I —"e � � j ��� /./ �% I I 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West T as % 11==1////' i!%j//j//, %/is;,. j I / Edina,MN _Z --_ 67u-On ,--' '%,A 6 .2 %./iiia• %� � �:%/�%�"'�� �� '�� i71' i1�8� —= 929 �� ��� �� % %%�jj%f�r/ % 'II 1 ,. PROJECT PHASE JOB NO. = M %/,�D�/, fro //////rS /i///. MI fJ;.. — —v1 // / /// a// .i/ % / —C 9301 % , '1 621. V/' ' '" MI 1=11Ø /i //!�//,i;! i/ SITE PLAN 31 r/ y , // /.,r /er. � / / ,,/ / s; /...,,.....,,, � � /// /; GARAGE LEVEL i� 932 , �r/,;,.. .c;1 / /.�../ =vet / / ,/�/; /% 75 %�,.; �.!�j /,iii�� � 1 MN // ////////////// ////' 9331 / 'Mr% :/// / � Ill EXIT r. / ,///, /, �/ �� i // nus �>. ,,� : � /%' /,— i. ./, 934 j% 7./ i /////// %%� i t------1111"17.„;;IT Y / _ /' / i// ..��.,..,,...,:,. // %fs::.f�tallsnsA� % ., .::./l/�/ / //�//!• SCALE GATE / // IT NM / // �� // / /////////„............... _ / / 1/32 -1 0 AUGUST 24 2016 ./ / / / ....r/� % ../ /ge,.,e..J., / i���/ mom'..-.. ///,--7- / // ..Num er r,e;, vr. /�//// ./ //,/•,.......,.,.r / /, ,w /_— ;/// ,%j/ 5 �_ , D ://///�:4 •,, ,.•//✓/ .///,/ /i-'/% r% //7 �j/./ ”s`. ,/ /// 935 ;�� % i/ :0 s/!/: / .j� // /:;% . // /`%% l// ti I w: t- // /' ; /// / /% ;/ .. .,/ ./� .•/ , /� / / C/ / REVISIONS / /-; „ /�. / � /iii% //,� �//i!/ � • � 7�s' /!/// r/ // ... �. /♦ iii /,/ /i //),/,/,/ % — //./ ��/ / o. / / ii /� . / / ////Vii./' / •'' 0, /�/ / i' i� i _ // ////2// 937 te ��j/V// %•;;;,' ///✓//�jj�i/ X' // ///// /////// r A,/j�� /'i%ii j , / �/. / .. .. 943; /////i%///, /;• /'•//% ,�r%/// /i •(7 j ��j�jj •/� /ji/r� •.,i'' !x ://"7/ Q►�t — _ V �//�/ ��, , ' j% .///���/,,/ / / �Off%// ., _///._,/ ,;-$;,',,//)%///-.0('- ! $// t/////////,/ / / s j/r,!r/ /% , ✓/rr"+.."�// s' ':/ //////- 2,///////1//' // j/ --.P.",",..///,';; .� j ji Pa, — — /��///// j,/, ,!' ��////'; tee,:;,,F• , 1014°-- / tot A. 1 . 1 1 ____ __ //////, /// / �� ' r`,,.. �� ' vE — _ / „ .., ////// // / r '--�� fill //,//// / 9.7 - 11111 MI N MN MN - M N N = NM NM MI - - a - - M — — I MS LEVEE — — 11 1 4�"i'H STREET , �O� el � M 4 Q pti 9> ' ��b C�� mo' ' / % ID I /AI ilirI J I I1 �6'-O"-- EXISTING DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS 8 PLANNERS I � I:; H CALLEC a. I /�� �� �TRASH COLLECTION � _ — — _ • �g,1 �•-r -\ , 7-.1.....,,,� Q ,--viiTPARKING ovi rR c �� ED SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA 1�aak �Ir �— — �� � �� �%e !'� ilk L ����� 930 _„� ARCHITECTURE 923'6” • 928' 930'• PLANNING / // /o `����� IR �i� � I/ I �( �����.�� 931 _. o' URBAN DESIGN / ////� / ��� 1 � I EI 25_Q �� // INTERIOR DESIGN / ��I�'/Y �I�a�r� ® / 1 HISTORIC REHABILITATION /� a -. Q • �� / g CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT I /// /, ��� �� i, .i , 1►� _ EXISTING www.Dur.Corl 9 3 / / ( '1 1W 937 DECIDUOUS 2 / / I� I' .. _ „ TREE 1611 BOREL PLACE."230.SAN MATED,CA 94402 ' tea':../ 111 �+.Sy�- - -- _ • ' /r— 934 . 11111 . 4 9'wit, /t. � err• �� TEL I: / © N W 114 4ii �'93 • rgiaM i _ �� ( ) 681 FAR:(650)570E540 _ b -_I EXISTING HOUSE IRR 92 � _' ' (A�1j 937 This clawing s the property d the Architect and may not 924. :. ::::::::::::::: Ink %Nip I l EXISTING be reproduced or used�u h15 widen pemissim. /j 934 • Dan Ionescu Architects 8 Planners 1 `����'�I�� ;,, I COYIFEROUS TREE //./� 932 i itorii, �i L. � , ©CopydOht 2009 DIAP _ _ I !i I = PRO 13'DE —1 ...__, s25• /- I 4 933 .� �� )\937 ____.1 [. ...... . , i jj , I_• " TREES TO BE REMOVED BROOKSIDE — _ I' — _ y WEST ILDING �` EAS ILDINGI %1171. ,� CONDOMINIUMS 92611cu 4OA% 0 Q I `` .... . .... . . f,.. - — ax sz�I1114 r,`` s35 uP IIIII� •BBY Q _� .0yl =I t' • PROPOSED TREES — — \,'� IIIII� 938 , I " -a !a 14TH. • IIa 935oLoeB I�-- !mum:, II ? 0 •. 1 I et411111 —'c 934 ".�, ( LOCATION — _._ I��1,. . I , 5109/5117/5125 ,49th Street West Edina, tMN h - _� GT-0" 0'-i" .2'-0" =a1604 , „� .2'.0” 24'-8" �F ,t O '//;%///02/,/� 29 .��} I � lit 'I ,,a PROJECT PHASE JOB NO. Z '?" / . era • // 721-�n ri rIt16.4"t446Pli iI 1—T.112. ; %;/�� `„ 30' / % I-� I I-1 ,; _ 1 -.7-"' '/;;// /i/i ! SITE PLAN �ai m // 9311.' / ��►�� i/ —� i//�%�/� •-�� /i/• �F � _ I �_ �►I ��, r I � / r;/i � � 1ST FLOOR LEVEL /!%/% / 9321' //' =—=-- /// 1 // // 1 //// ,/ / ////� 937 , } j/,l"%;,�//// /�;,�// 9331 %%" ij I // i/////—/ I / ,,..„,/, ,,,,...._ // 934 1• /\ , / 934 I_ _,.,,,934 _.� 11I1;. -�� N1116tiNIM S i// / 1Gj%� /i/// ►/, _ DATE SCALE ////// �. / .......:.......�� ,1 -- �..._..: FE �' IIIIili1. �'� .- .�-�•�j• _�///�,./ /�//�g��/�,/,J 1/32"-1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 I — — '//// / 935 ,'1'/ 9 1 im®� •/' 41 i // //�// j/ REVISIONS // / , 1.—-- -. '4444 1 / ,/, // 9361 %/ •.�� hw` / // /� 777-7- 2` / -2` //; 1 — //',/////! ', % , is _ /7„,// y'iz' i///// • /' / / i5 // VI sa / /j////'j/' / � �• 4 , • _ / /i/; '/ i i .� � , / dm //!';;//,// satC ,. � sf ,ma �-'� , 0.- ____ i — — /// / / � • i,----. — ,47--�' _ _ ,/,/,/„ ,/, - -,,„,, , , ,, _„,... A. 1 .2 /,„/„ /, ,......,. /,,,,..„...., ,__ 1=1 =I ME =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I =I ■ ■ DIAP DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA i25'-0" 62'1-0" 961-0" 621-0" 30'-0" 67-0" – ARCHITECTURE - BANG I 985 I EAST BUDDING WEST BUILDING I UR PLANNING INTERIOR AIA TION TOP OF ROOF I w-t - JI 2 I R -..-.- m i CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT I -■ ,s ::a= �T mljm_ dj TOP OF ROOF tYYYWJ7IAP.COM 971 -'1 / '---------------'''-- 1iI ■..\ _ - ---------- j 1611 BOREL PLACE,8230,SAN MATEo,CA 94402 I �L FT a•' _________ __ •• � 963 TFL.:(650)5701 FAX:(650)5706540 LOFTI ■�" .'""'1••• ■; 1""1 11 " ....... te:1.... - iIIIIIIIII�... - -- _ � III III' 957 This drawing�1r• da.Alchfficland "a 3RD FLOOR _ 9 �r may•,no :nnr• ---- - -•_ --_ ----- , I @VERNON AV 3RD FLOOR be reproduced or used without his written penrission. S 949 I ® —'—" —""—I •:®•• nlllll ' �•n �%•ii iiliiii•• _ Ka_ Dan lonaa ArchitedsBPWmers 2ND FLOOR EXISITNG IIIIIIIIII,•••.••••• ,. I' 1 ,. --„ II I, ifl; ii — ® IIIIIIIIIII! ©copydOht 2009 DIAP ---- �--- ulllilllul:::::::•::�_ –� ?,!aalllllullll111 �IIIIIIIII — —�_�j® :: IllEl I �'�' �— ___.— �IIIii1111''y Illllllllllllllf – �•��miliIIIIIIIII 93 940�— I II Ilnlnlllu 1„,„,11 . `-- I---1' -1- -`���LOOR ��49TH ST I Illiilll IR,11111311...------....... - — I III,IIIII1111111111111111111111111111111 TII S00 LINE 930 1 �����• sssss;s-,-,,,,,,,„:5,-..„...",,,,,,,,,,,,,,„ j /;o ,,/„////// ,,, IIIIIIIII 111 o III I� I I III TRACKS __�- s , / r / � ..,,., .,�, BROOKSIDE i / I ej�j�j���� //�/ j // jjjjj �/ / �������� ����j�/ �j��/��/�����i %//Z/Z A 49TH ST ELEVATION (NORTH ELEVATION) CONDOMINIUMS I i I ILOCATION 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West Edina,MN I - PROJECT PHASE _ JOB No. I SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS I �25'-0” 62�O" 96 a" 62ro" o'-o" !- G7'-0N 49TH STREET ELEVATION BUILDING WEST BUILDING�5j jj •_ _ ,/ / _ _ ! SCALE GATE /O/,,Ak :: O // j � 982 1/32"=1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 TOP OF ROOF i '4Jhe _1♦ ' /,/ j/ TAL--1 __ +TOP OF ROOF ............. .............. ■ j/�.. %/ ■....R / /�j/ ::S•' YSSiror / REVISIONS • " � i/ VL ,..■■....■:,..,.j� ...__ •�,4/1.,/,, /mss/ %' ------- :•I---:------ // OFT ti .° r %��, ::■ = = ::.::.. �/j. .: j '- ..I ,� l n , 4/ i. ` r___ :. :::::&::■::s ";/s �/ LOFT _: 1. A %�IIIl„1„„.!: , II19111I11 % - /' I■I■■ . . .I ■. _ ri. - 111111 111 / ri 957 I 1 %, Rill 3 • 00 i - ' O •1.... ��, / I ;�// j ................. -�i �!� NON AV ■■..� ; ' % L � �, y � / 3RD FLOOR 1 _ j; ® % • /u� ey�/ n nn ::n u.. H/ a %///, ,�IIIIIIIIIII' .i ..q ,/,' ,77-illi, !• i4 - V, I ." _ I...■I •VII• —®•• i�iiiii,H ,�,� "1- 9� �, ////�" " �... i1i'iiil .. IIIII111111 / o ,` I 2N• •. "r EXISITNG / a� ' /.tires/%/;-4-: .� , ., �._ �///'y 0/D/iii • __kiOfJS�--- 1 � ..........I_ – _ .,% , �� - "--"111111111•1110"/ ��i ��////%/O///.. .� J... .. •• .. �, ,:,4, ,u.. 940 >�� IIIIIIIIIIII:::::::::::i•. •• I� =/%//%.�"1111IIIIIBD 110"//%%%O///�/ = ' I-I ® IIII ® _I _ ! w: ._o.= )�� i> d/ �oi i'''''i - ... �� �'�� �. 1 � ����`— � �Ili�iillll��; III�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'.II_I, ���Illlllllllh o��i//////,/ia��aa,�„ �'� IIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII = 1 M I I 1 �� � L OOR 49TH ST � lin IIIIIIIIIIIIV !J IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1�7�� — 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 HE � -7711"4...t..4 S00 LINE � / / / �j����jjj/j�j/�j/j�/j/�j��j�jj�/��j������j�j/jj//j�j/�j//j�jj�j/���/��//�/%// ////////iav,,.,.,,,,,,,,,,,,..--.,_..-------_ ..,,oii/ii////////////%////%%%G/r.,:,-,:.._ ._._.. ///�%/%%/////%// � /jjj//j� /j j / /r // / / / // / / j// // I i i 49TH ST ELEVATION (NORTH ELEVATION) i j (WITH EXISTING TREES) A.2I1 I ® ® 1 ® ® ® O Q 1 �A 1. iAP I CANIONESCU ARCHITECTS S PLANNERS SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA I— 30'43" G2'II-0" 96-0" 6211-0" 25'-0ARCHITECTURE BLEST BUILDING BOUM I PLANNING URBAN DESIGN j _ ! 985 HISTORIC REHAIOR BILITATION 982 j I II I +TOP OF ROOF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT i11 _ w_ Ill , wiw www nur.cor TOP OF ROOF 1 Tim ;; ,T TS7� ::�:: ::B::B al �,:: ��}?_�� -.F::: - - ---------- •.•• 0: ! 1611 BOREL PLACE"230,SAN MATEO.CA 94402 J •■■ :..._ I 971 El / -- -=---------- ------------•■■ TEL (650)5708681 FAX(650)570-6540 y�—�— :.I ------42 -- — LOFT ll Ill -7111111:i_ � ':: I� ....I ( ='I . ' ..I� III I ,_sr'r: :::::..:::::::�:::.:::;::;: ::::.`.,IIIIIUII ! 960 957 1 �''' _'.P:Lv:Ir_N 'I•r••escal 1 '":x:rii: '� I II II I I �All si-- — ,� 3RD FLOOR Tns o-av s u e property or me A cratea a a may not ....... .... :: 950 p. ------ ••••... :::: 1 be mproao Plarrlers -__ •• or iced without hs wri 3RD FLOOR (djVERNON AV 95115 � ��ri�-I ® -- ® 1111111 1 949 an laKsa Archteds8 M.... MAIM % y% // %// /,,4, ,,, ,, :: ! 2ND FLOOR ©Copydeht 2009 DIAP j % 9415 940 - 2ND FLOOR / / _ _ 935 //%/ %%%%� / N / S00 LINE 1 . T T FLOOR / O.O�O��/ 1S / T , /� r/// RACKS / /� /i/ / / .alai/ //iii , /// r / ,,,, , , , IDE / , , BR KS „ /�/ / / ,ilii,/iii/i/iii/iiiii// /////////,'//// ��//���/��//j//��/jj�� / V / Ar////// / % %//%/i%i%ii/moi%i%iia%il %� / I CONDOMINIUMS VERNON AV ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION) I ILOCATION • 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West Edina,MN IPROJECT PHASE JOB NO. I SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS o'-0^ 62'-0" ['ff' •6'-0" 62-0^ • 25'-0^ 1VERNON AVE ELEVATION EAST BUILDING ij' �jp ./j % j/ _` j% -/O� /, - j� �' / 'i Q ■ SCALE DATE .� jo. a / � �� / ,,,ai/' ii- 7/%,' ��� a q / // /,:% q r, j'' / j a %:- �// — �, /' •- •• R FQ 1/32"=1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 T OP OF ROOF ,//i/ `/...7''7%/ "i> 4./��/ / j%i q %// icy/ a /ate%/, .mz%.,, ....... ., ,:r !�� // / ��7,'' q i� / // /� .:i�� / // REVISIONS• ..t.,;;;;., !ij / %,%�//%' ,.%qr•,,,- ,. % // %//'e �// r sir,.�s, ,c , .ax;;c ... %�:ee%% // r v L7 OF f / 1 p/� L G/ /% /A,< ,- /• �6 / , !��� ,. ////� �I � /.:xe �> ■... .j�„v„ �/ �� � � .�� of / ' ti / in,,,,,r, , p. r► Vr / / ,/ �® / �// / :751,71, / ./,moi / j Iv i:, T3RD FLOOR �j� —�B��A ►� �*��' %0.,, _., 6 p�VERNONAV ' 1� L\��1� .^. . .:w� m.... �< 6 ..�° ;i. ."°2:j �// %/% 950 �+ „,i,./ - ----- 1_feint"IgItI"■ul►��1.1�I �N�arA� 'r ,IIS-P a ......y,y..- 11�illlw . ,,,Ci%///o ,m4+�� s _ / /%� //„/„„„ ,/////////////!!'!iii„.,„„ 444,/ _ — Vy 1I 2ND FLOOR j ,,, i �. � 1 /jjjj/jj/ /j / LINE S00 / /j/j r / jr,” /o %% / /// ,ice . ,,/ . . rr// K /// � i/ TRACKS /j / / / / /� / ,,,/i / � % %/�r% %ii%/ % i r / VERMIN AV ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION) 1 (WITH EXISTING TREES) A.2.2 I M = MI = E M M MN IIIIII = NM MN E = MI = M MI M I 1 I DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS & PLANNERS I SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA H 49'-3" 1311-0" 40'-6" ARCHITECTURE I BUILDING PLANNING URBAN DESIGN INTERIOR DESIGN HISTORIC REHABILITATION TOP OF ROOF SEE 'li; n CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT _ -:______ / •ri o••I •ii o• •• •--. '::::•• ' 34'-6"—. _ 1611 BOREL PLACE.#230,SAN MATEO.CA 94402 I AL �3 I / II_. 11 IIII .•••••••••• n■■ ■■n •Ii ii \ I 1 TEL.:(650)570 681 FAX.I65o)570-6540 7 LOFT '• ' 1C1G1 �� 'num .••::x•.::• I 1 I 957 ...... nnn ■..... -_ ...... Iliiiiiiiiiiiii' .■■■■ E: II'niiiiiliiiuiilll,••:•:�:__ This drawing stnepropertydtneAmhteaadrraynot 1 a ��SR` I ri 1•a be reproduced or used without Ais written permission. 3RD FLOOR @west PL I nnn••^ n• nnl ...... ...... .... • . . ..nn ® I I 950 Dan lonescuArchtedsBPlamers I ® nI::: ^ �.__ nnn -- . . ...... 946 940 __ ■■■■■■ Ill 111111ll1'' ■u■ nun••-___. -_I n■u^ ILiiiiiiiliiiiiii.Ill III I I ©Copyright2tb9 DIAD EXISTING GRADE '-'� 2ND FLOOR �� %///�////////%///////%/%//�//�// %O////%//%%/%/////%%/////////i> ,,, ,,, 9¢ I IMI %• i'; G,// ,,. %,i — •' :����i :■.:n::n nom■ ■����■ •. ::nn■11: '' .lin•-1^ 1 / -- /'--, •�� I ' III �� I.1 --- 935 ��������� I, ��,��II`I nnunnnnl nnnl - ��� ��j///////////,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, - alt �� Ill l n^nnl l 11 -.J ii 1Y ST FLOOR �/ /,V. ` . /j/jjjj�����//////////////,%///�/O//lOa�aia/a,//,/.,,,,,,. j/jj - 24 jj/ / - / / /�/��,,, „//////iiiiiii�i,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,. moi- / / BR KSIDE / 00 7I EL L / ,,,,, ,,,,/, -G�13AG_ EYE _ i / / / / 1 1 I CONDOMINIUMS SECTION 2 - (GREEN PROMENADE SECTION) I LOCATION I 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West Edina,MN IPROJECT PHASE JOB NO. SECTIONS & I ELEVATIONS H 49`-3^ tat,-o^ 40'-6" _ SECTION 2(GREEN PROMENADE) WEST BUILDING 00� /// SCALE DATE gg j/% j� , 1/32"=1'-0" AUGUST 24.2016 �r F F oma, - ..- OP O ROOF /� �/ / /s � r / , � -,/ � ------------ �::::.:..._ REV S ONS ��ii�� .�� � _"_? °'s%%i��' � �� I Vis ... _ � 34-6 963 �� / /.E,A / . .. ,__� �� 1 LOFT / //il,,i:11/::5111.4:::::;..[6r7711:::i‘ /% N %%'���• �� ...... ,i� 1 % a/r:.•':��..,..%� :::: ::: :..:..i - ....■. �� i:t I'/ / � - �' �� �•�••• luuiiiiiiMIL...;_idrii., /3I 950 7 1LOOR j/ j G� ��///,e�/ ■ .: y . /(O3 west PL / // .� 'N.OI�' I'/ / .■■■■■ A,/ '�1 /� zi% ■ //�,,.,rvo�./�',,.el' - % !%�j�•.� ^-yfM�t� nm oerL -. wiiiiiiimay.' ....', r� -- --— _ ��i„ „iic TING GRADE / ,: ;�y; ; - ii /y.�4�� /// ----- / /%iii, % / - L i �.27 NDFLOOR /// / /,, __ �_� ���i �` e/ �Y�rl(<' ■'I■■II■ 61/:::: /...i//,:,,/,', .../ 940 III .,,..,,/� ,� ra■■■. u.^■mm� . I , Ir■■:■■ .,..■■.■.. .■■■■. ■■■r.■ �,;.I /� / 930 /„�%�%�/ � — ��111�.��1�1�_i� III II ......I ... •� i��� / /���/���///////iiii................................ --- - '��.��. iuiilnlnln ..��J ///%//�i � y j /1//�//,/�--- _ ■� - yip i 1ST FLOOR yj ' / ���` „,"/- -----.----'''--777--"---'.----;.% _�- ioi //. � spa __ //// ii ///////////ce/ /tr////////�//% / 11///j):::://::::.CTIRIII:O/EN'S)) l, /iii4 GARAG V / r/a /I %/ / o / SECTION 2- (GREEN , , MN a ■■I M = N M M ME MI M N M - M = - I MI I I 0 I I DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS 6 PLANNERS SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA r-25'-0" g "�� 96.0" 62 30'-0" 6T-0" ARCHITECTURE NGURE EAST 1AWEST WILDI119 URBAN DESIGN II 98I I HISTINTERIOR RIC REHABILIT TION TOP__,S,__90 OF ROOF I 1962 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ' j TOP OF ROOF www.nuP.Co66 I 971 �I 1 1 �I 1611 BOREL PLACE,"230,SAN MATED,CA 94402 1_,S,____.(9)/F1 � al V al 963 TEL.:(650)5706681 FAX(650)570-6E40 T O i LOFT �� IIIIIIIIIII Fl1 it I liii73RD FLOOR I III1 I 957 T1:say�u,ePrrydn��rrua�am.ynor I I - i " I OOR be reproduced or used w8hou his written pe^rissfon. rlCil @VERNON AV i 9,5o Dan Ionescu Architects 6 Planners 949 IIIIIIIIIII_ —�- 2ND FLOOR I �II��- - II I ©Copyright 2009 DAP EXISTING GRADE rl ,S_„WW1 " Eli 1 I IIIIIIIII{k j �_ ...�� iiiii— aullllllll OO UNE go ���/////�� DO�D�O��ODOOi/�. 111% -1,1111111 'vC`?LOOR TRACKS .::;��0�00 j/// BR K IDE ml 1 ///////j/��/�//%//%/////%//%//////%�//�/��/ilii/ilii%ilii///�//i////ii�/�i�/////////////�///� _ ,..,,. .. �/ ND MINI MS CO 0 U I SECTION 1 (EAST-WEST) I ILOCATION 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West Edina,MN PROJECT PIASE JOB NO. I SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS • I 25'-0^ 620" 7 T DUGLDINS 96 in 621-O" WEST BUILDING o'-0" 67'-O" SECTION 1 (EN) D//// / I SCALE DATE T TOP OF ROOF I %/� j� I 1/32"=1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 j I % j j j,. T7 OP OF ROOF 1 um REVISIONS OFT ti i // I p ,I- // // , //'1/4:/ % ,,,/,/,.„ 1:111, \ `/1111-41420E-ROOF„ ;L963 r j��l1101llll 11 IIIIIIII�j/ j �� /� o �, ./.4 .4 j %illllllll )III_ IIIIIIIIIIII y °' oFr , 3RD • OOR - // � j� /////i i j — �/ o r �.%�� ��r/////jy m°r"%% r ///I . �����j 3RD FLOOR i / iillll �//� �y'j ' f//HiiOiO//// /roo _. 950 • /IIIIIIIIIIII //;e .n.._ 1101....---- tell )III_ IIIIIIIIIIIIy� / ► 2N" •a'.vI �I 1 1 �Kraii Nor � y �//l 1,6 INII I1tJ. vu �_6 . amaai,/a„aoio 940 �' e” D -)IIIIIIIIIIII )III[k• ____ ,' = FA ../.oia%iiiiiiia iii i�...P II I y;4� ��e,l)III I���� �llllll— aim/ice/`�r,, �,,,,,,a., VSOO LINE i%� ////�� W' OO/�%� �/O �DOOO/DOOOO//O IMii� TRACKS ' //:-/..�.,//��/ / / / .,. 'Ill-MI -�i / oil//ii/r.aiu_i %iiiiimii ///imi/i//mmm/ / j/jjjj/ //// ��//i/a/ili/iiiiiii5ii�%�/.�./////���ii////////// //ia_.,..,.,... � /.,_.._��/�� / /�� / V ��% �/// %/// / �/ / / / A i SECTION 1 (EAST-WEST) (WITH EXISTING TREES) A.2.6 - EMI =II INN MIN EMI - =I MN =I NMI MINI INN MINI INN - NMI - - \ N. `. \ \ ,. \. \ \ — \ \ \ \\\\ \ \.N2:\\ \VAS\\\\„o,,,,,,,..„,774,,,7,--\ ....��o!<e0v\�\w���•����V�llo, -i 4 1 • � -. .:\ '‘ -,,,‘. .. .4\ \kV v .__vv.,,___vvvvv.,__.vvvv_...vvvvvv_y__,v_______.._._v__._..____�_._v__vvv..vvv__.�wvv__. �� \\.\\ ��yy\`vy y\\ vr_,� �� �� �—�������������������t�� �� � SII ��^ DAN IONEBCU ARCNITECT6 8 PLANNER6 N A wvv '� \ � ►v� SANFRANISCOBAYAREA. � � ���� \��\ ��� ���\\�����\ \ \ � URE ��„�., ARCHITECT O \�� \ �� �... ( PLANNING ��\ ,, � \\\ \ , �� URBAN DESIGN \\ \� .A\\\\ .�� ���\\����� �\��\\V ' . iiPPP A1O \ \\. .,<� INTERIOR DESIGN �� •...•���---• `� V <v . . � � � A A v\._�V����A\�� � \ ��j�� HISTORIC REHABILITATION v \\\\\\\\\\� \\ • ��������� � � � ��\ O\���O \ �i� CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT \ \ wwwaur.cor 1I �� � � _ 7611 BOREL PLACE k230.SAN MATEO.CA 94902 STORAGE ST• S10` GE STORAGE ..�. �Ira.:issois�o�set PAx:ias9is7ossao MECH.sTa�AG� V Kiri 1► ,TRASH ROOM \\ The d produ a the PmdeiH of the Awrrttect and may nI. STORAG f , n y \ Goe repoOuceC or usesw thout n s w"nen pemiss a e-f1 18 6 \ Dan IonescuArchitectsBPtarners, \\\\ T \• ©CoPYrlght 2009 DIAD co TRASH ROOM ;' O \ n IllarrAND N _= 11.1111r LL It.._� ... �■_.� ►iI \7 , .. f�i � 1 Eiar ,STREET , PPM. 28'-3” 28'-6' 19'..6” 28'-6" 28'-6^ I :� f BR00 KS I D E & ti I I I 4'-In_ DRIVEWAY W CONDOMINIUMS ��`\ ``���W- IE - N -11'-0" 924) b% 11'0" 924) oo b Alk C/ I i- \ ,14 1 I cr) ,. `\ '\ Avtkot-A'.;:x...- rn.11 lift— LLICATION \7 _I,-1 0.1,,..._,.:,- ` ,\\^ , \ 11Wil_ �; f1( 011,, ` 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West \ v *• = Edina,MN Y ECH.R00 TREES LETEND �� `'''�! :, PROJECT PHASE J08 NO. ,�. \ 00 I QI 0000-0 rff ��\ G; 1 --: EV."OOM I — ` I GUEST I- STORAG" PARKIN BUILIDNG PLAN I \ ' 1 \� \ � \\\\\ VN E LEVEL � GARAGE STORAGE ST*'•IG: \ \,\,,y.&4&\k.;z:,-;z� \ Sr' •GE STORAE 1 I. EXISTING •. ` <.\�! J \ �\\� \ iJ \ ` WEST BUILDING WOODED AREA \� \ <��7 \ \ \ \ \ \ Z\S,.Q\ \ . \\\� !\:. ` ♦ SCALE DATE • \ \` \�\%.;...:....\\ �� \\\OH.. � .•. o �\ N. :. �I - \\\\ \\ s`i ..`�.,, _.�i``i�.♦` \\\ \.• `�. .\�•' \ `\ \\ �� `� 1/16"-1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 1\� \:<�♦:+` :\`\�\ ` \�\\\ \� \ lir, REVISIONS EXISTING• 0.\ �\ m, �.! �.. \ \��� \�''� \' 11 DECIDUOUS TREE \, .,. �\s\ `\\\\\\\ "tom ?\ \`X� ``,��•� „...ir \ ,,,,. ... n Jort-tg ks401' '' N ,, , ,... \\\ ,..L ik .„:,-.71 .\\ r EXISTING `\��\ �CONIFEROUS TREE <«!♦1..�� \\�� � ♦ � � x\ \ tliff\ , 1 mig O! N .\\\ .\\�\X..., ,/ , In , n<.� \ \\:` fit:iv\ r " :001-- IIV ' .Q� .. . \ x•x.x\, . \\ ,' i/� 4-0 931rpktk•-imi �) 928') \\\�\ \ �\\\\ \\W.r\ ��\\ \ \ \. \ \ \ _ ��► a A.3. 1 TREES TO BE REMOVED S'k� ' 0 �\ \ � \\`:.:• �' iiii $s\-.1 :"%-• .'t *.x \ , -.. . ',: ��!\\ \\,„,,..:,„:„..„.....4„.„,...,„...,\,•,,,,„, 1 ' ..: h),„, xe*, \\\\\ N\ \0 \� \\ \ ..'..''.,:. ..'.: .: -' .':r .;• •.'i•' ,,,i.,... :. ...,.,. ., . .. . .... ., , ,... ,, . , .:... . , ,,„ , ,4%,,,,,,,,,,,, PROPOSED TREES \\\ �\.<<<<<<�o \ \\ a... ,. ; ,.\��zkNkXk, \ \� :., i MI M N E MI NM = = E M NM E N MO = S I NM I D 1 A p \ \\ ' \\ '\ `. \ '.\\ '.\ \\ ` '\ ' \ \ \ '\ `. \\ `.\ � \ ' \ ' � \ \ \ ► \ 4 . `w \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\\ \.\\ \\" NiNN ,. "N„: „,,\. ,4k. \ :, _iii..........N.:!.. %lob., NNNiTh.pe.,;• ,‘.. ...N.. ,4,v‘. ‘ ... . L\\\1/4,t N\.\- 11 •\ .‘1•N:' \\\\ • \ \\ *11A1P1 .i/L \ - \ z, x b \ \ \ \ NI 1 b ea MIt \\/\\\\ �' �i DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS 6 PLANNERS I \\\\\\\\\\\� \ \\\\\\\ =-\ - \ \ \\ \ \\\`i\� „3' ` SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA I \\\\\\\ F $• ;4 \\\ •o �• \\\\\\\\\ \\\� \\ ��/ ARCHITECTURE k+3'-0" 938)le , p '1"�,. M � �-'1, \\\\\ \. \\ \ �I PLANNING v :.� 1' 1' ►G r .-i . �,,'i',, ;'1 URBAN DESIGN -1'0" 934) o�� �� 127.72 FT\\V A '� �T �'' HISTINTERIOR RIC RE DESIGN � _il � DECK �'�■ DECK: �' -1,-0„ 934) CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 2, -411, 'fC 2S " � % WWWJIU►P.CONI r` Q I �t:u ] ] � 1611 BOREL PLACE,#230,SAN MATEO,CA 94402 u n u■■ ■ ■■■■ ■ ■■a num TEL.:650 570-8 AX:850 570-6540 y,i� r- � muuoo■e�■��nouonoonoo■n■" __ � � �■ioi■i■■r■ � ..�,r" • �'.� ....■........� 0]IIHI■ IIII �, ■.■:■.■.■.■.■.■ �-���� TRASH in ■.i.it,"yy■■y ■euiiiiiii■iii■ii:r�:ir■�■iiiiiiii■i Pil e?:;1111 ..•LL I• r7 1n�i bilbii� Ii�i�i����■i■i^i This trax9ng a the property of the Architect and may not O ;a ..:....::; '���p;p.�..:p be reproducedDat or used without his Icnesa Architects 8 Flamers permission. r"�- Ili • INI Ill UNIT1-R ' ----- ma____ o ,�, zDOso�--° — _ isei EO ■■ 143'-0" ■■ — 34'-6" �IIN II L!s' Illipmfg mi _, Itar �B ' -- , ,WIIIIIMFdk sBROOKSIDE 1,1 13=In '4n - 11w. I , �����.11' L J li.I - u , ff, Ii ,. 13'-4" .o oN — VI _f A1111111111 Up — = — 111■11111F I DRIVEWAY o LUCONDOMINIUMS � T �• aD 11111/1111 •�ZpE■_•.ti,, 73-4•' 111■1111 _ W_ 1 CnI = - st• n ; E _ '-0" 935)— — — 11'-0"(924) oo h**��i , \ I` �� ��;- :1� 18'x0 =�;1� •�� --_--_`'�� r I AA��I1�■IT`-]1■�5.0 ur7■fi■ Ilia II �♦ ,�., , I B III ll I1 6 , Ifi r •OMAN MI NI .-0" 934) 5109/5117/512549thStreet West TREES LErEND ' PROJECT PHASE JOB NO. iii N ■1 km6Iill____ /•-----'-- �- UNIT 1-FE ENTRY Lr:BY�?' I 1 UNIT 1-F xnwu NI— :2:§■■r _ _ •SII •••■•••••-i i GUEST BUILIDNG PLAN .........r .■:Ell PARKIN _ __ �� = I se—== =_ _ —MIAMI ....■R""""" 1ST LEVEL .' p�0� ;EXISTING -1'-0" 934) I� illi oWOODED AREA � �`�'- � II �� IV_ WEST BUILDING ' rnI \\��- —6- 5 • ��r \ ' tornrn ^�� ��: II ALE GATE SC:����� 1/16=1-0 AUGUST...,.tl..,:: ,:.::.rt;�•; -.4, '\NY -- 24,2016 • E----- • , `,•,t GREVISIONS 5:' - ' r IiiiillWMDECDUOUS TREE .:.,:'?,'r - \�Q ��I.���?'', _ , i - UNI\ -,;•. :fir,=;:�� , 4 pnno , fi�pr. ;; C`' �i ••'FRONT \ 1ST FLOOR FRONT /I„, •.„p \ �, p '6 AREA: 1625.82 SQ.F.T COVERED AREA: 1625.82 SQ■ .mu��!n N,CK: 12732 SQ.FT. 8'-0” DECK: 12732 SQ.FT. �. I ��EXISTING DN Iiii CONIFEROUS TREE /�. L _4'� ��_� �0 0" 935 , \ 1 Or C171-0: ` � 938 �- _ 111: ` II (41IN • 1 1 ITV )11 . ) =e1\ 25' p" 63'-Stn ,/12'-31" 18'-3" I fi ,. UP 4,,,n M% r ��' .-4'-0" 9311 ��0�°� ��■ �,111114111"6174 928') TREES TO BE REMOVEDIL r7sibperlifitilicl,,,J4:1—kierz-r": ..... iew w 1 1 1 I Kra \\ _. . ..,_.... , _._7 _17.,-,.'„._ 7., v„....,.... -,../.,,,„...,_ _,„, ,...... fifw4 - folf_wir 1 ,,,,,,,Iti •b..X4i . . . . .j kki • . A.3.2 1 PROPOSED TRE Off. .�t� aA w�e�� �'�` 1 law _�� A `�Atd� = I 1 N = E i = E ellIl I = N = = E \ \\ \\ `\ \ .` \ \ \ `\ \ \ \ \ � \ \\ \ \ \ \ �\ ,. ‘,.. \ '.%, 14,:‘XN1\\. N. '! \N. SNIVIk. AS‘kok,'% ..4.1k \\.. \.&‘\\N.. .\\I\S. \.. k\. \k\' \\. N, \N, \ a \\ \ � \ � � It\........ \\\\\,...1501r �I/ DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS S PLANNERS \\\11 \1\11 ) \\ \\ -CENTER T �" \ �� SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA I I I •• ,, •"• E \- 1 ••' r AFFORDABLECENTEI •.•• • u t t ••• .7 • ; gropp":•----1 ARCHITECTURE �\���_ i�� \\\\\\ � _ ���� �� � � FORDAB�E \\ \\\ (' \\ PLANNING COVERED AREAri i \\ \ :• D AREA: 916.71 SQ.F. COVERED AREA: � ` C�i'.(�� 1■ • 1 \ \ jI URBAN DESIGN INTERIOR DESIGN ' DECK: 127■72 SQ.FT. DECK: 67.86 SQ.F1 DECK: 67.86 SQ.F1 0 kr.IF 1.FT. `�J� HISTORIC REHABILITATION VP' IR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT . Q -1'-0" 934) 25 " -1'-0" 934) www.uP.co. 1611 BOREL PLACE,#230,SAN MATEO,CA 94402 :-'..T::::::.. _ I, __ \ ,�,/ TEL.:(�O)5706681 FAX(650)570Fi540 4-•;,r -� t TRASH ill1!!!IH1!9111IIIIIIIIIIIIIII� i a�► !!! .--■■". IrAND Tfdstrawing rsthe property d the Architedandrosy ratUNIT1-R UNIT 1-R G he reproducdlor see wNwu[hsw tenpemtiss on. DanlonesaArd4teds 8 Planners44 4■.■.■ .' AFF-CENTER AFF-CENTER '� UNIT 1-R �( ) ( ) UNIT 1-R :•-:::: ©Copyr1ght2009 DIAP EMi hi 10' D! 143'-0" € D� 1 (AFF-END) �I � 34?-6":�, : :_ IIIII ao 1=1u 'FF-END) IllI 11111 II ... ..... i' 1111 II V 923 N � 2 II 1111 M Bu N li51 Da h III=III �tna Emma n l� Lli, 1 1 ,, Prffi I BROOKSIDE J 7 1ME. airv1111�1 " �� I'ral� 111111 —, ,,,, .=:[1� irad mi IIIIIIIIIIr 'i 1 , DRnrEwAY W CONDOMINIUMS ® o .. /111111111 �. . ,,.� ,. 7314" _ 1111111111' _ o OA cFE _ _ 1 _ • _ 0'-0 5I4-11'-0"(924)-19. v'9. I. i ii IIj v -. '18'x0" fn=•1m�- p _ _---_--_ 7) cn MIN Ei i mora -mu `4 4 11 k-1 0e-I"_',7"--.\ LOCATION P III 4 -A i i"; IPMlit 'FE II 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West \ ' ao ri ': — — Ng -0934) ` Edina,MN " II N �p Ly ILS_ III �REESLc•EID x, 'Il.r� E � I 911+ PROJECT PHASE JOB NO. r::: E Los UNIT 1-F ::•:•:•:•' ••---� - UNIT 14 tn1WILI!I i::-:i:-ii n f., i:0000 171-1" O WL7AIL9YYt 1 i:o:ioo oo:oin illiriAl _o �::.::::.: j i1011011i GUEST I� ,::.:;,::.� -- .•.r::::r BUILIDNG PLAN 01 mom] Imam MAM% PARKIN 1 ......., �� ..... ■"""`— � '''':°n- _� 9-3-51)-r I U. � 1ST LEVEL(AFF. UNITS) r m rJ 1,41 EXISTING 1'0"(934) !�`,:o::. WEST BUILDING WOODED AREA `� -" 9 b" 1 ®� 6'-0" 15' . �sIk 2 ��- � 72' 12" ��— 14'-OZ" 15'-0" 1-6'-0" ii X8'_5"�I \ 0 'y 4 \�r1�„r ::�0� _Aiiirr -�- �i �I SCALE_ GATE s / ♦ 1/16"-1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 EXISTING i \\w— r�`a �`�� r \ REVISIONS DECIDUOUS TREE + \ ag Iiri\ ` _ UNI �/, . •,�� 11111111111.115441 �I'�OINt FRONT If filik!PIP 1ST FLOOR FRONT , �" 'a�: - i } ;} �I COVERED AREA: 1625.62 SQ. . 'ive.n NsN.CK: 127.72 SQ.FT. DECK: 127.72 SQ.FT. (41111.# rC *1 EXISTCONIFEROUS TREE N., Ili iv- /0"1221.14\71.1 . t_ Iii&�4'� ���.. �O 0" 935 • A \ DN +6'-0" 941 4 938 � %( ) UP \ =;1^ 25' �" 63'-5 " 12'-3 " 18'-3"_ ����► _Illti -,,,I � 4'-0" 931 �'v/' �II 10 .- ) 1 928') TRE BEr '11�0��� ����� ��1 . ��® N� ES TO REMOVED ���• ���3a��� �� \ ®���e� AI, moo• .:. ` c' ifiramitorf,r A.3.2.2 <A.-) . ____ _ _e_7. _ DIAP , ..., . ... i . . ,...... ....... . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _, ,., , , ....... ,,,, , ,„ . ,,,, . ,,,, „._. ..,_ ,____ ,. .. ___, UNIT 3 R (MAIN LEVEL) UNIT 3-R (MAIN LEVEL) i DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS 6 PLANNERS 3RD LEVEL REAR-(MAIN LEVEL) I b 3RD LEVEL REAR-{MAIN LEVEL) SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA COVERED AREA: 1374.40 SQ.F.T ■- NCOVERED AREA: 1374.40 SO.F.T ARCHITECTURE DSK 127.72 SQ.FT. o DECK: 127.72 SQ.FT. M URBAN DE IS GN 0 N I INTERIOR DESIGN " I ' ," ' '" ' '"y I� ' " HISTORIC REHABILITATION E 14-10 14141-1- 23-52 I 12-102 12-101 I- 23'-51"/- - 14-4 I 14'40" CONSTRUYYCTIO M GEMENT F REL C cW--i-G ■'r'''c"ee�■■, - , '--- BELOW, �■■•e;'e-i■iiI■ 1611 L (65)570-6#230,SAN:(650)5 0-94402 :�■w"p 'i:�i■:::::�1 25�" -I IiitirAWMi liNer- iy " TEL (650)570.8681 FAX:(650)570-6540 ■■■ ',P,ionu'o :::: y i■n—nn■■■ iu■uoo■nw y•;! This drawing ms the property of Archied and not ■'onuor 9 P PertY �' :■:■ ,�:i■:::::::Lill Il,�uiii:OZZ ■■■ be reproduced or used without his written permission. •;■'; ■�i�■'oum : -•••••••off y:1 ■■■■■■■■:■:■4....,1111::;;;;;;;;;:. 'Ti■ii::::::i i:AT �:r ■ ■ Dan Imescu Architects 8 Planners ■000. I: ::::. 1111 0UNIT 3-R UNIT 3-R NJ:.''s :I ::•,:■■:=1 @ ©CoPYrI6ht 2009 DIAP I;:■E+:::::o'o•. ri:001■1.2 �r,,�,. �_■143'-0" �_ ; - AIN " iga g- gis 34'-6" - I' ■:' ■ :.■■_ 4•:�■;■;■;■;III + Ili■:•:•:•:� � -•I ■:■ .■■■■■■o ■ - 11101111r% 1 Il•, UP UIIONIO•LiNAM US _I 111 � �!UIIONEI UP LCiI.piiigr 1 .■■�'.�■ 5_}. :: rioi1i ��I�Kii Ilill �i'.����� 11, omuiMi 11, i�� ��J_ '�.�E��31T.�L NO ilimaiIi _ DN CONDOMINIUMS 1 0 - - 7 !!Lir _ ji • 11■1"1. I::iI:Ji I ,s,„ , 7_, ,„,,,,.........:_: 11 � � 11IIIsoma— CI 1 !J! 1111111W1.1rnill 14. ■ _� mtwa . NIA WO . . iii' ���nn'on , ``i I 'ri�II��Ut ■ uuuur■ ■■-. LOCATION •■■ ■.■■■■■�� ti -i Mal= C_J UP UP ..,,,,............„4. ,,■_ e . � E■ i■ I , �'� �� , , II"�■■■■ ;- �■;■ 510915117/5125 49th Street West •■ ■moor yyyy�■ N �� vmoo■�■ �•; Edina,MN e-- :� �.i:::nir� '' LONE )-�i MN I J:L4 i ii III:I '' v�tit l ..■.■■•i �, ::::: UNIT 3-F j]:i' .. 4■ a• ■...• ?. •4!ouo !1 ■•- ■ :r. i;I PROJECT PHASE J06 N0. .;........ UNIT 3-F ■■■■■■■.. ■ +:-O 94�) e�:; 3:iiit":- AIN LEVEL (MAIN LEVEL) "'"'' .■.; 4 �^ ..■■■_■■■■■•■II II::iii i;■■■.. ■:;I -_ ■�" 31 "' •'" BUILIDNG PLAN WRA IkargaratliNista -_--i_ _.PIVVral ,•-. _ ....; :•:E3 = ' 3RD LEVEL 14'-10" 14'4" -r- 22'-11�" H X13' •--"__ 3' • -• I 22'-112" -r 14'4" 14'-10" { WEST BUILDING 2 51t-0• �� r-0# i k1 4-6'-0"4-- " SCALE DATE • �" 13,5-0" -6'-0"�-4-6'-0"4-- 1/16"=1'-0" AUGUST24,2016 ' \---„, REVISIONS UNR LEVELS UNIT 3-F ( L ' - \ 3RD L i. . T'-(MAIN LEVEL) � 3RD LEVEL FRONT-(MAIN 4 L) C AREA: 1396.14 SQ.F.T COVERED AREA: 1396.14 SQ. ■ \ N CK: 127.72 SQ■FT■ DECK: 127.72 SQ.FT■ ___ / •, -----__011 1 t N N M 1111111 = 1 11M1 N EN 1 I . —7. : , \\ i. ,_________inifita itornEv -- 7UNIT 3-R (LOFT LEVEL) 1 I 3RD LEVEL REAR-(LOFT LEVEL) O 3RD LEVEL REAR-(LOFT LEVEL) DAN IONESCU ARCHITECTS 8 PLANNERS COVERED AREA: 598.00 SQ.F.T NCOVERED AREA: 598.00 SQ.F.T SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA DECK N-u' SOFT. c ARCHITECTURE I DECK: SQ•�• URBAN DESIGN 10 �.�" N INTERIOR DESIGN HISTORIC REHABILITATION - _■_■_■��■�■_�■_■�■_■_■_■_■_�■_■_■_■_� ■•••••••••■•■•■•■•■• CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ':i`■._■...._.■..."y■.�... 73 Q" mea�..■..■...e e■__■e0 WYYW.DU►P.COM yy�oiioiioiiiiiiiiii�iii ratiiawawiiuouii■; :;:;:•;►iio•ioiiiiiiiiii�uiii iin%i%cioiiou.�cii;:� 1611 BOREL PLACE,#230,SAN MATEO,CA 94402 - ,'s■11.11■1•;•iiiiiiiiiiiiiii .i liiiiiiuici■i■ii;;■•■ - TEL (650)576$681 FAX(650)5706540 — o ■000 - ■•■•.•■:e ,::•••••,..__ f ••%y ;�.;.:ej. - _ . :,;r�,r' :!:_o..uu,,, / 25 \ ■uoi■i...:;c..;:.: \-- ,_i__1_ ,,./ i wwzmaiddiiiilied —— BELOW.TYP iii � V / A\ �� 1 ' This hawing is the property a the Architect and may not :■i \ i be reproduced or used without his written permission. OPEN TO OPEN TO 1 a . 1- — \ / OPEN TO BEE ON( BELOW OPEN TO \\ // — i=_'I ' Dan lanesco Architects A Planners \ / BELOW BELOW \ / c o cyr O copyright 2009 DIAP / All it 143'-0" = � \ 34'-6" I / / i4ii!■�i:n:i.■■■.�...■.■.■.� Om [ r' iUlE!!0M / i'llooirovir :: ii::: . \■ ■ ,n■ ■_,_■- Oma ■ M Ole 1 V / --::1 ■i■.■ ■■■■■ ■ ■.■ 1 :;.;.;rte.114444:: : : : ::::.:. l ��� - :•:•:::+1::::::::r i::::::::: ri A\ : (.::: � —_ --— :::::::::::;:;:;:;:.: n;■;.;.;.;.H x�. BROOKSIDE :. .:::.II:I:I:I:I:.:I:I:e:9::• ::::::9:eaa:•alla I,00.11.:::• 4 ■a '.4•1144•41•144111:11:01:1 "■'1:..4::: :■'°:•• UNIT 3-R II UNIT 3-R 11'1.1':':":"e::": c;_;..;•;.: r (-I --■■•c■ r- a•• •• ■.•■■ ■■ ■ !- ■■ ■ ■■■■■■■ ,'-+. ✓ : ;0.2tag■:.:"■.:■■■:.:■•■:■:■mg 4.■.■.4■.4444■. :■i■ri■•■•■•3:8 -`1 ..• -... .: :. .:. rr:.: � :■:::,r::::: :: ::). 1�a1 W CONDOMINIUMS © c c _--tx . .�a"P"i"•i■iIppi:idol:o,.yy � � -.� J ::;:::21;2441:410111111.J:::;:;:;:; .�.1i.�.,.■ tx't'C' W _ .,.....:................n (LOFT LEVEL) N ;i (LOFT LEVEL) �; � CC{ J •_1_111■'■. :i;.■.44 iS�J .. 1111110 V : : . H'r 4 7 t 0 I . ■ ::�i:: ..��■. 1414■ ii44■� _ i� _'����II + ��1�i _-_. __ I:i:i:i:T:'.,. .-" ii�i�r.■ni rte' ' �. Z V ri1L. ♦.1, I- �.� /..� ■i-i-.■i•._ ■. 1 I I IMP 1.,■...,.,�_.�.�,� �.E l,t..■,r`{' i 4♦� .............. UNIT 3-F UNIT 3-F •.•..•.•.•.;.;.;.;.; ..♦♦ �\ ( lY {:■:•:-.0000000o.•:ii ■4 4.41,■. 11 Q — ---- (LOFT LEVEL .■.■.■...■.■i•..■ ii•.•...■ _ �' 4•4•4 ..,...:,:......, I i� II 1 a 41.1.1.■.■.■.■.■.:.■. r..,.,.. . ,. \\ J r 7;:;: : ■II■ ■;:::.:..: : :.:.:. .p :�:,:,y:,:,:,:,:,:, !y:may.;y /-_\ .. ■4ld.l.!d .�.r- `�` tt4� ; ��. ■.•■■■■.■■■■■■■■■• 1 1414•:•.. / i LOCATION POP \ ■4444 i•i / ■■■■� ■■■■■ \ i44.■■ iI -..r ■■■;■:■;.I _ 5109/5117/5125 49th Street West �� /I \ 7- ON°MU.111�� _ M11111 DN \\ / \ I Edina,MN r / r / \ ,� / N 1 \ _\ PROJECT PHASE JOB ND. �� v OPEN TO OQEN/_ OPEN TO OPEN TO / v // v v BELOW BEL9Y I I BELOW BELOW // \v ) 1LT..!11VI!: iBUILIDNGPLAN �.00n.....iiii. \ � iii..►�;:;:::;.■0000■.,■..............._.. .._..............:.:::.••:: aI' LOFT LEVEL I14et ....Sn�nnn.I�;luwh -- 55712212212011 WEST BUILDING '�:'.'.:-71—:5'.::5E-.::5:: ra , _I_ : u - 1*-6 23'-11" — 26 9" 23'- 1■ 14'-6" Nerift SCALE DATE 14T-0" �� 1/16"=1'-0" AUGUST 24,2016 'I REVISIONS -_� :- I - LEVELL I UNIT 3-F (LOF LEVEL \ 3RD ONT-(LOFT LEVEL) 3RD LEVEL FRONT-(LOFT , L) `v • I ; D AREA: 628.89 SQ.F.T COVERED AREA: 628.89 SQ. . \ _ t< `� �. CK: SQ.FT. DECK: ---- SQ.FT. �� , ( d3 , ________ A.3.5 1 \\ 7 ,\ \ ,, \ 1 1 l / \ _ MO IIIM NM IMM ME N I NM M M E I N N = MN N NM Campbell Capital Group, LLC 111% 11101111111'kt10%4 iiow/ ' laikt INt �' / i ill >:7-ijit"1-141i414111111V-'1 111111 ref !tilt' 001 /\ owl/ /��Ivr1 .111"4 /Irk �'�� r�~. ��<t, �1 III X41,, .l s 1i if PI r �7:aIuu , N 1 ri tl ! 1���� 1 '�1itt., I ,aro�� EE ,,,,_ lids �1...r •til ;1ir r'1110,��� ��� solcommoir A.,".! , II ra ill ik. 1 NOON Mir lir "Ill 1 .1 'II net.,,, I "I'.111001i10- eir li 51 II I. ! al�,/Ig1�!1i1I t1- l iiiiM FE ,_ oil s ® lit l il11111M Itt� ii i. i i_ +r! r NI, ,�_t,O ili, 11 , I !� li rl �:ll/ r� ial �ik tt Ii X11 ;�� nl �'in !/ - =. iiaJ �I �� ~Will I Inv— , W II Itj ib �r �1t. �� r %_ �11 ww 110 ' 1 -�' II II III ITr 1 flip N I �..•Ixii- _ ,yak IV r yl �- I .l� -I1 11111�tt1 tillI11.1 it I; !I 1t :I.7 1 1111 i 1 .[1] , �1 No iiLi �■ r 11 mttenummilun>tuaf, �� I �■ i R, � + _r?d `lam@^. ,$ 1, S' a,' Y r ,7 � � A'a A I I/1 i'.. ,, **;'',i."0:'41 �. a ^' �r �kg `�".+ R6 r �,, r` ,, i i.iii: iiiisattoiiimr,,,,ilin • ° afer_,re — — y - .�" Ilk W.72nd Street Se — S GQ o�0 0 Q u.) Z Q c we Ovv.72nd Street Perspective Not To Scale:Illustrative Perspective ;; 21)11 Edina, Minnesota August 31, 2016- A3.0a ©2016 Poole &Poole Architecture, LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113- Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group, LLC NIIIIIIIIII'',N11 1 ._ _ .. __ __. , - gioNNIII . , . all' 11 li ._. 0._ ---- . if 1 G 1 M ■r "t: iUtIIi gi II �lL .,�.,. VENNI! �� Imo. �i �i N - ' I illii etlimiera 0. II .II i► Ii wow■■■rte „r,�.�n,�i+ mi■ N 21 NI i . lit ` �� �� � � ■:r, ■ x/11/ii rw 1'■ Irll NIL« \ moon IL !! 1. 111 r . I I FE I 1— I I I I ——i =11111111111 H i ii ili ll - - iiiiPfmtpraloinill 41 II �- . �� mai• If;:.iiir;J!1; 41 ,ri 1 ri_ � � • Ell 11 .1i11 BE ELI III MI 1111 1111•111111.1 1 in �y� ■ _ — — — —saNtr,*. 41,4 :> T ®+ ' 'p: .. . gill rte 4 . -Mil I= -� s" te Ct "� �,. �. k' . i. 4: $., - }» f - i t ME•.,.. . . ""'-lE"4; I: — ..1.1.1"..::-'is IttifF4011r—* _..r... fa;;:ihk19‘ 7_,.. i'' Irv,ie iii‘lit 1:lb/14'C _;...,44b,,z,z..._._. ...''. A - .. — ....- '''... :47- .a ' • */0 i: -, ,—,v. um • . , • : M 6 Ak 3.0. W.72nd Street w iii] Q w U Z Q W.72nd Street Perspective N 1 Not To Scale:IllustrativePerspective ;; 21:11 Edina, MinnesotaAugust 31, 2016- A3.0b ©2016 Poole & Poole Architecture, LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group, LLC ~. n•ImI1n1I.em ~fir mnI'i1uli. : !irIUUI1 11MmiMaImll !i iiiiiiii ila 11 ■1 1-I ►■ I ■ I".I.C1...11:1.11 iniiminj — 0 i i h il le lo En E-- .m. w al ma isw III il 111 ' on Ira=: Nino II Ill IA Ill II I I El =my.Ihmillitilitilmg in. • I !ra; 4 1 Pi —WNW ............._ . 1 is mil I II '- – miiimmimiLIMBILIII " 11 III • — MEMM ,..•NIMMININwm m.. .. 1.11 •II H I I IN I I o I 1 I in ki ill En ®a■■ f limo MINI i MIN. II ii " H 11 H H ii il 11 ig ga gi szirr, . _ @fitfv ;pr1 I - r moi, Mail� i�ilWIWI EB ii UNEP t.. Inr ! _ ! . .mill ■ ■ %1_ !:. . �■I it !I, 14 - . I� I W.72nd Street w 0 Q Li Z Q ck w 0 France Avenue Perspective Q Not To Scale:Illustrative Perspective ;; '3.0 214 Edina, Minnesota August 31,2016- A3.0c ©2016 Poole & Poole Architecture, LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113- Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group, LLC —mui- —_ - — IN Num. - - i - -- m MI M i=MM.=_ iii... -- -�1 mIH - /1 1.1 H HI H H N ! i■ ii 11 fl U -! �� ■�■■■■ ! „L --R iii Ali'a ii it _ ,� 13_ a Fail= — — - •x- .. « - S,'e°`i.- ». ,a. 's'. ;,rte - - $ dp`+ < ,• .:-,"x'. _ __J ■...1► ■■■ ■1 .' II II / 1 1■ '. ■1 11 I. ii.' 11. 1■ 1MMIN■AI ANNii I� ii■I i ■I ii r.1 ��u 1M—WPM - - NIis - u ii 11 1: t- `jil 11 II II 11 1' 4- '1 11 r ii4 .�► �'■INE 1-== - - iMi��i ri 11■ i■I it■I 1�I11 MINIM►� t_I�1 1 4 1 iiuiSol MI _ - - Imo. .1 15 ■■ - •t■1 51 IIil 5I Il' ''■1 11 N■ II111 Min1 — - - Nom � ain --- II. : Iir -- ■II ■i a ■I l�rl titti■iii ��Mt � NMNM= EE . imoomp `ia H • ••51 I. mi ll I. a le 1. � mom�� om its E �� iii ,: i10I ,� ■I .e Ili Ill �_ , 'ii■'iii t■i immm EN mil NE immi . ......_ . __ ___ , __ =.... .... 11 ' 1 " H um is :i um= 1: :Irmo' 1: .i FFI m1110111 ..m m m • •• oli mmomm A ik Ami \ Am. ink A 1 IMMO! IMMEI I W.72nd Street j 0 <Li, A z A3.1 Q O France Avenue Elevation N, Scale:1/20"=1'-0" Elevation \I 1 2PA Edina, Minnesota August 31, 2016- A3.1 ©2016 Poole & Poole Architecture, LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113- Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group, LLC ill tit. i II 11 , 111 Iriiiii ft I il lir il 1 11 • 1 ii '' ___ i L , 1 1 1 m mor.iinommini li II li il II li II 11 l' • 1 — ' IN on r lip Ili' III i II II, 4 —an --iilal.Maii 1 &nil ill 1 mil. 1 NI 11 i"i • • • II mii 1 - ,.. li 11 I! I. •I - • , 1.. .14 IMII II 11 ; ii ii ii it . . I li-1 im mi IN Pi , 1 im. . , !I i i 1: H II _ H H _ 111 p . LI , II 11 11 - Iiii - - , 1 , 4 I loi CI it 1 " ' , i ilill 1 1 It , n AN II 1" • • •1 11 li il H I• •• , • uiri .iiiiiiniiii ' It:.11 111.. . a ill , IN NI litili 1 , ism I. I I I I , MIII I I A. 11/11 ' i I a a hill Wit -I 11 \ 41 L . qi L I 1 milt ill ill it 1 –.... — • 1 A3.2 I W. 72nd Street LLI > 0 L 6-' z < c. OW.72nd Street Elevation N ilk Scale:1/20 =1-0" Elevation MI Edina, Minnesota August 31, 2016- A3.2 2PA ©2016 Poole & Poole Architecture, LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113-Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group, LLC gal 1 I- NE 'A- a is Fr , ----1 , i EilriTi EEI I IN T 1 iim FE 1 I. Fii 1 1m FE . II H � � Ii ii �1 :. � Ii 11 1 I-I ■1 ® � ■� �_ H ■1 �_ H ■1 �' �1 ® H FIR111, 1 II FA! ■ 'maim mum lllill® �'i®■ Wilda imilrilli \I I II .1 ' LI i II 1 LII! PA II airi •ri, • 1 lo I_IH FE _1__Iit H _1 __II- Eii —--m- FiEi 1 I■r l l!I NI �.. lid SS ill MI MB i■"■ , -11 •• •• Hk .___ _-_ oh. - ---- H _ _ ____ Di i � III-MI IN lii i■ BM� III 1 II ■■ .1ril H :1_ H :1 9` :1_ y .1_ .1_ _I■ ill 111 .. .. iiiiii 1. ®®ill kiiiii�l Wilda liiM ®®I IlII l El IN r m• •1_,ImIl Fri i • Fr 1 H 1 H 1 u Fri I I: Fri I II FE 1 . • .. mailii.iiia. ii II 61 id it El WIEN itg—ONi I*IA MU il*Mia Masi 111 IF I. I W.72nd Street w 4 Q La1,11 Q O West Elevation 41, Scale:1/20 =1-0 Elevation „ Edina, Minnesota August 31, 2016- A3.3 2PA ©2016 Poole &Poole Architecture, LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113- Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 Campbell Capital Group, LLC I , mom= 1 1 � or I: ill %II lit II II 11 il A i" El_ _____ _ Nagai ME _ El Ill it I: FIR 111 11 li 11 11 li 11 11 li il 11 l• _ I NMI 111 MI 1 MEI . il II IIIII"IIIMiiiii ii Ili _ ■!■ ■A -__ ■ ■■ 1111 ► ■ ■ ► i ■ ► ■ ■ ■ ■�■ ■■ ■��_�-_ ■■ ■Ni ■ 11! ■■ ■■ i! ■ ■■ !I ■■ ■■ 1 ► I■ -�- �- — -I--III■I- -- • l■11 I■■i l■■I I■■I - i �: , 1_ ■: ■■ ■■ ii IIImo ow II 11 Hham II ii II III i ► III / ismi ■■ ■ �! • • im ■ !! ii ii I! ii ii ■► is Ns No --1' Ns .,-' N s 8 -�-- - i---Gii iiii dolt: Illii�l, Iii�i Jj-i ----I-fr I W.72nd Street w ill Q w U z Q OSouth Elevation Scale:1/20"=1'-0" Elevation All \I 1 A3.4 Edina, Minnesota August 31, 2016- A3.4 2PA 1 ©2016 Poole & Poole Architecture, LLC-3736 Winterfield Road,Suite 102-Midlothian,Virginia 23113- Phone 804.225.0215-Internet www.2pa.net 1631.00 ® m n as 3 f9 O Mo n 0 a C f 'O I- n ii n 0 3 1 yyMg ` I 4 ��QQ''''(�(� I 'i ;Ii.I” _ L L P B B n Iii ji CIII III � Q . �2�I£ a.x !$ l i—I—i l e. r,. IAS A; M,_cr° _ �; a c, ill. :IAnir s i ? Campbell Capital Group,LLC -LEASING/AMENITY AT SECOND LEVEL(4,300sf) 6TH LEVEL TERRACE(1,080sf) I I I I I I/�I gl . \X- 4kk, 1 �. i' *i.‘-_,:*t.‘1.,. \ ►'1 I ` �T WIT Cf _ ��� \WITBI N! m! 11'1\ 102: -47\ "`''41* : ' `' : ,,,, ,, yc - .sr.�r�w.. � �17�..w` ��:<�'i \w�. r s \'i ems, I` h ,` \.IL` NnN- 74_,InN1; Ell . IFE:M �_ws1-1��0ioi\ f ^V�><I 1►<�.w1.a _ :24:11:1 ^e..N E, cee°taop 1ff 1 i A., s i _ _:1 • — Il usttes FH .� '''.111P VI,1 u' ) 9 1SHI— • WIT BI �. u� r �> zz WIT A6 � UNIT A3 w1r et Inns `� m i� I >�I j '-T `�Y N H -j I ^TSall_ — Ip t ydlT A6 - -- UNIT Ab m II n1..s F lira I I I I I 1• 1 o, r,,i II c ■3 1 �AI_1 II I_Ir1 .I UNIT A3 r--1 (T II MIT Bl II iDUB l PI" _ _ ..I -.,*r - JNIr A3 H1 0 L LLA3 I 11411 A3 E 1 ■. 1 a , ■ r":::: N CV - IS-.TZ.-.SQ _ _ R�77�INuN III �a:s.mgE a=�=Et6R1 — ii-"1 iiii.,, _*, III. n . _7,..i 'n Nn: _1 W-12 --1 g,.i• 1261_011 •`i"„"- WIT A3 1 -p UNIT A3 �_-� m �' WIr BI LLJj n 3OC.raf 11111111 III , WIT BI hillMe are- - 1TUT AI Hi 111M91 �� '��.y,j 11 i WITA6 H x N� ` WIT A6 i 111 I! WIT BI i. Alig �I3 1, g WIT SI n a WIT SI INIT A3 a.• �\ 1F� I�rSZ F' Kneel INET A3 . WIT A6 _ ilk`� WIT A6 , `.T. �" I 1 1 —0 I' w -o- '1 ` e +1,1 s � �-1 p LI .:. 6. �� ;.: r--gy p ae rem - inlni: h 41 -.1 i _ s ?b. < x. n1. : I _ n1n e8 —��e 11—i-11 9.�— r •9 411-1-11 ,-, . I. r' N WIT GI I V/ I. t.. ® �� I - 1 1 s WIT CI 1-- ' _ I �� N■ _t 1 7 t;_� a c .1 i • w1r s1 JUr BI Lf41L@I ItiILGI 1141161 , - I I I I OSecon1/d16'Thru1•-0'Stith Floor 1 Saab: Plan Edina,Minnesota August 31,2016-1631.00 02016 Poole&Poole Architec:a,LLC•3736 WInterlleld Rood,Suite 102 Midlothian,Virginia 23113•Phone 804125.0215-Intemet s ww.2pa.net ,.'' ,. - • ','-•.714-- .,. ' „. . — .. , ri ..... ,„ .. .. ... . c ". . . .„,.., -;., . 4,. . . . . . .. . , • ... , . ., ,. . . . .. . . .. ' ..„., ... ..,, . .. ..., ..., , .. ,, 4. .1 '''?' , ' : # ' ' . .''' .1.,' 'i i'A ,0, 4 • , -• • - % - . .. . I ' ,• . kl• 1 ``', t. .-••-..:''.. ' .-., :4 4•',''''.' to . .', '7 .•,. ...:. , • , . ' . 4. 4 '' *4 ',-. ','••- '"it ' It.," ' f,:.°F/e*.,1". ,,,,..,.k f.',"-'...''' 4',,,':::, 1.4""' 1P, ''''''1 lit* . " • ' ' .,. , , . . .. . '- - - ' 11!''' v,,,' '4 ' - .'' . '.' '' . ..„,... „. . . . : ,:.: ' .... ' ,-,, r ,... - ,;`•;fly 4,.. . ! '' . ."1"r,L"' , ' I . • . . -' " 4401, :..'1,' - • ... . 'St - 4 ''11...e.44 .'''''' 1,. , -.. .a. '''. ' 411-PV. -0.-N . ji . "4 .••-• ,. • ... ..., .„, ., Ti .,... ,,,, :.,"' ''''''' IN ''t ' ' , I. . ' . '''.' '''' . 4 ' ,,,1 '''St '. ' S. ,.e.' '''''' ' - .. (in Jew .. . __ ,.._ ,._ . -:, .„,,,,„„,„,,.. ,,,.4 A., . .. - r - , - . r''' „.. . " ftiA. ' , •,. '-...- . , • , ., • . ,,...t . . .. #, : , . .,,,„„ „.. ,. ....,,... _._ : 1, .. ' 'r, -,`,„ .,,,.. 'Th .. ' ; L-'40111 1. r,.....4*- - I.),,r4,4 ..- rs..,•:ft-IP 4* -1- '4,-1,0r ' * .. ''` • ' r la. 'I ; r %.:..: '' .,•Z Ilk ... A,'... 111 • , . ,, . i . . ..., •', ' elt,p, „,./ ,"..,., . • ',,, ,,,,„ ,_,..., \ ) '•'I•III'V• Ag;..14,11qt,... . , , _ ..,,,, . :"..: , .., .4.. . ,. .,..,'7 F ii \ 2 11 ik . . ii - ., - ' `•-•',. . ...A 1 . . 46.. . , . . . . . . r-.. . ,',,,,,,,,,, •' - .„,, ..--,,..,,,,,.. ,...., , ,-.,,-.,,, .',. 4' , ''4. el' ....,' / Mr* 410 4, H... •,,'":.-7LL' '''..'At:..''''; . 7''''''-' s 4* l' .' :‘r ...- ' J....Ai. lailo I ----___ -L ::-."---rr'..• - IV. -.ui 1 11' 4ir:.',If ,.'r, i'r.';r:',;*::.-::::. ';:.:.;''F'' "it**. , 3 lessf .... I. E f V, g 1r". '. ,,:,! - ., --,04+;;Ari- .: - . A 1 .. -. 110 lior I / ...- ''.. ,.: Llik00;t: . * . , Z 7-..::' _. / ...._ E ,. .. I\ r ...•' --I ,..'"Abilr' . . ., .,.. L----- • 8 g 1 „ , .. .- -,,..,--'' i , ''' '," T)8''',1-1 2 ..„, i . ,• i . , ....,....,,,,-17.)8>,,„, , ,-._,• • .... • . .'. 0 0) ''' .r. .0' '.' '.. 5'FT1 .., ,, ,„-- .. , . - .-,,,,,,.----.. — -- ,-,,., - ,..,---i m , ! , . •- c. , ;.:„.„ .„ , _,„(---- 4,... ..:40 - •::: I. ., ,.... ci) --I . ,..... ,- ... •, Ii him!! . holm! : ..„ 11:e,......;,,.. ',1 111 I m...... II t UU 111111 111111 F!' II I v .,,. ,:,,211.0 0 - RJ ' I IQ 0 VI 2Vilitti m UI" ir 47 _ I •• ED 4..i.gro. I r, . _ . ..,. i r• n i g.--!W Lt; E a w ..11. E.,2 , ,, :a, '•.. 7 ..ir 7' . IF.• '' IML •a 411111 &-** iiiki, ...CUP,IBWIV.k. ....141 ii.:4 ...1,1 ..-—IPA, !...s:1 Cs- Alia_— /A .._,NO 8 A . . ,. . . . e' F.: '' .. "11.014•41ail 7=r-4 10111 WI V r:H .4LT'lli nigir ill, f t n'' I . , ....4.,., , i „, _ ,- 111! El 4101a-11111-al f 4 11 1.:i I „,, .„istoli-p. ' "V . .=. m,. 4 2 _12 ; 2 1 =< •. • • lig 11 :.. r0LI, 11AN:47p:4.ir114,i,oi,t7oI1i_tinu111l•i i1rIIPvF,.I..i..l,-I.ar•i_-)l a.,14I,g7.,, ,.i, ,= :.,„# M:,i:,.:,-:3,...;:";d.:.:-.,:::•,',':::::i.:,',,-'.''-.:....'":-:.',.''2,:.i.:-,.;•'-1••:3-:.,•::\.:Z:..‘:.:,I. ....:6,:'...:.1.,1..:..:.-1.„7-1:.:1'1..A•,:-.:...:;M.:,::....„':",-,,,:',:' .,,...:.1.0-.-.'i,.„..... ';4,"'.::::,.,4,1----','/''i,-,I,4,:i'.1;1;:".,•...t..I.lil,i0wvlilie.1'.1F1.a W , , „- ...'' 1. 4 • ,, ,-.,-,Pil 001 =-`1'"" . , . am 'IT .—.481 . . 1 •' III 111 Id* 1,„11., I_ • ,., z,3 XI .:, *II. ' . ,/ , P. 1 2 0 r IF ..t...w A.4., r. Z M 0 ill 41 It 'Mc:: , ' •' M M s•-' M •',el.'', 3 ''''''') . 11 3 ::, - P 11 t-•._t Ill*IIII': . 41 o ' ''N'...: • *-A11111 6 in '4 I pilli:MO f• -—:-,,,t. ,,....,.:L.' E . • ,. .- ... =7III 7 - r 4,14,1e0,3 • • in, .•-• '• ,4,,....,J .P.,,,1 ,.i ,7111, I A 1r"1.1 w407,1i.r/R1 ' ''': ...'-' - '- ' - ''.'... L:. L' '•';'kiii:''' in.,' 1 . .... . . , -,. ! 'II 1 ' ,,,,,7.,,,,O'fr.Atirld I ''•'r. ,'.., ,:', ,' . .''' .''.' .' ''''',,;':' .,1...'';;;,Y,';'''.' .111W 4... . ' , -,,' ' ' 4 r......tiPT:1-.7*Z4t/Alti ' , '''._::::,.;,;:-..„:::;.:,.;••• ''. , '•' ' ''':',..-...,..,,,,,:::;5 0.0::,,,...sx':-"Z'- , , EX! CURB‘tie ‘ ". ' ' IIII4 t t'' i.N1 '''. '',9•'" . ' • ,.. ,"."...:...',„,... - - - '. ... wilt 0 i i/1414 iir Itiost '14 Wt. • , ., ,. ,r. ,„ g t , .''' 4.111,1, mour'RIMII . 1111117:174d11; e 'I 1 111 21 ilk.= i ' P II Ti-- • t Irl ... . 9 1 . ... griz.,...,:i" ,111110, -,. ,.... -.,-•-•,,,;,,, ii il cii,- / -11111-,*,76, IMg% .... . _ Li.',42... Alr'.. .0-1161-4:41i.7,Alli-MIII-14Lks 1,I,iii iiim. 1142...1.-r•I• IPA 7.:,:dP 1 Itki...is!. , , , *,, 1 't...4-.4,',,-';%; ' ' • ;'''' Igiii. • . , ' . 1131";:=.2 41J*111F411.. all =.= 'Al —11,‘ 2....-W.."-wi ' =• 11..vpirriti Fr..-6.1F..!= •41_11111Wir 11=7 LWIL_ALW!. E • ,i IS:Kb 7:27 . " 'III l''' 4"-i R - - 'Pi" ' ittr 24.4:Ji.iiii.,,, ,.--- lir =alosirohlitn= r =-22st . E I:..11, 1 Ciip,„:;...„.01 kW: a g II,. 1*,,,,,,...0.t,I • "....... • 1. ,,. \..,1 .1c. IA . , 1...,, ..,,-4,,. ,, 'A•-.,f• 1 44 . , ' 4 1 II Ea p 4 II p 1 . . lumps ' ,Pr "Tirir" 11.0. .n. 7_1141111.110111111„11,411 ruin.A.,-*----. . , i, _. . ,1 1.... . -A,, . ...- . . ; tO• , ., .4 ..,„ , 1 r ' Or '.r.,,.,.. 'it . r yr,. r-.aft.. ____._ - 4 11111--- IV- '''5.74r('' _ _. -. ---- - - 71k SI- ,....... , :---- ....... .,• -: . -,,., I .. , • aAviaue.i.,,A FRANCE AVE SO. ...........,.... ,.. SHRUBS PERENNIALS TREES i I i r • Mcdora Juniper Karl Foerster Grass I. Dakota Pinnacle Birch I . r L •' I Winnipeg Parks Rose Little Spire Heritage English Oak Russian Sage 1111 NATURAL BOULDER—1 RETAINING WALLS Pardon Me Daylily Sunburst Honeylocust PROPOSED BUILDING TERRACED NATIVE PLANTING GARDENS 'ROPERTY LINE NATIVE WETLAND OVERLOOK Pune Meadowbnte Coneflower Princeton Sentry Ginkgo ENHANCED WETLAND/RAIN GARDEN— 11111MI1 WITH NATIVE PLANTINGS SEMI-PUBLIC LAWN SPACE ■' a Little Titch Catmint &TRAIL SYSTEM — northern Redbud � . , ■ 1 w� N. I iiu:n Kea Astilbe ' ,,, C7. . r�' p Tina Flowering Crabapple 3 ,,„,,--.4-4::* -4, 44,;4, -*-- 'All - II II ' - 1 i. ' ..: yiiR�/yy ` t +T • ' fi ,s 1, -4 I ^3s x I I UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 7200 FRANCE SITE SECTION CUT �.1�1� 4:31 W 35THST X200 y y�i ST.LOUIS PARK.MN 55416 Project Number: 16103 Revision Number. V ♦r. 952.25020031 763.213.394 G R 0 L) P via .CivilSiteGroup.com Issue Date 08/31/2016 Revision Date. 4' 1 il • / woo o■ tr � Ill I ! IArsairdmia.ftmralrll , mar I. mir _ 1■■// 72ND STREET WEST a4... I- '- _ • 1 0 CO CO N CO CO CO CL CC CC 856 x = -.416 411111L AIL 4116 ANIL .11116 „ Amit. 854 o�v 853.2 w joiLir 853.4 I ■ti■��!!■►w■ / \■A1r1■IN■PMEMI■M111 Jl11=1 ' ■WRIMIN■■!■[IIIINC'y�:�� --- ii►W - - --I1 �.r ��rill '•i•' -�Tr ►.+i�i,�■wt -rte.' his' `•4t `�] ih if�t-Wal. 1 jr MI/I LIE Ill �: I� r IPh\ I s, l 1 ��� �/ MAIN ENTRY EXIT •ONLY O in ��•F I ® ENTRY ONLY (RIGHT TURN ONLY} �� illTRASH LOADING AREA O MI I. � _ MAIN ENTRY FFE 854.5 1 { � `/`// j� � a MAIN/PARKING 1 LEVEL:::::::: tiI ..',, s42 110 7140 .co ® ' '' 1 W 838 848 2ND FLOOR --/ LLI "8• uo , _ ,1 ,, , 1 / O �� TW 846 :W840 \ • w , ill 0 i i I VI-Ji i 1 :<. ,,,,, Afill c , ' 1 i q i .i , I 410#4\ph 4 p ..,.le 41 IIIL, -14 ' • I ktO • 8 0 1111L14 COURTYARD FFE 864.5 I ' t 8.2 MAIN I PARKING LEVEL1 FFE 854.5 I 0 . 1 BW 838 844 PARKING LEVEL 2 GFE 844 co N W ilb "U T--- I 0 I AM,0 WI r I 1 I 0 INFILTRATI• ii tn BASIN I �� I �� BOT 830 i , o ' 90,000 CUFT 0 I o 404,? ( 84 10. ' II- SO e !P. _, - i i4 ,830 a UG CHAMBER ( ( `, u 844\ • Illir 1 I' '0- 77'X162' ' 162,000TOP 42 frr 50.00 -I a-1 ‹ i .i) . TOP 842 \ ....... Id t _._. BQT 832 O - I 1 , \\ goreigi . ,...... .Jm•L ,,,,,, . . 1.. i.. lh. i. i. Ami6_, :Allial„.. low. `.. 000 111111. !vmAlr agpmi - 852.5 ImpF MO IMF 1 ••••••On MM. VI, IMO IMP a=.1i 840.6 — 1 j t _ i" 40'-0" 20'-0" 0 40'-0" ; I Board/Commission: Planning Commission w 10 If y 2017 Annual Work Plan Proposal • o *Complete each section with a white background Definitions: *Liaisons need to fill out budget and staff support required New Initiative—not on previous work plan •j °'AOB 9 *Return to MJ Lamon by September 23, 2016 Continued Initiative—carried over from a previous work plan with a revised target completion date Ongoing Responsibility—annually on the work plan and may or may not have a target completion date Initiative Council Charge Target Completion Budget Required Staff Support Required ❑ 1 0 2 ® 3 ❑ 4 Date (Staff Liaison) (Staff Liaison) ❑ New Initiative ❑ Continued Initiative ❑X Ongoing Responsibility 2017 No. Yes. Planning Staff spends the majority The Planning Commission is responsible to review all Land Use (over 80%)of its time in support of land use applications brought before the applications submitted to the City of Edina. Land Use applications planning commission and city council. include: Variances; Site Plan Review; Sketch Plan Review; Conditional This includes meeting with applicants, Use Permits; Subdivision; Lot Line Adjustments; Rezoning; and preparing staff reports, answering Comprehensive Plan Amendments. questions from the public, preparing for and attending meetings, and project To accomplish this responsibility the Planning Commission meets follow up to ensure compliance. twice per month, on the second and fourth Wednesday of the month.The Planning Commission typically reviews 3-4 of the above requests each agenda. Liaison Comments: Click here to enter text. City Manager Comments:Click here to enter text. Progress Report: Click here to enter text. Initiative Council Charge Target Completion Budget Required Staff Support Required 0 1 0 2 © 3 0 4 Date (Staff Liaison) (Staff Liaison) ❑x New Initiative ❑ Continued Initiative ❑x Ongoing Responsibility December 31, 2018 Yes. Yes.This will require many hours of preparation and work scheduling and Comprehensive Plan Update. Update required every 10 years by the attending meetings.Staff will Metropolitan Council.A goal of the update is to complete mini small coordinate with the PC Chair and area plans for all areas not completed in the current Comprehensive planning consultants and provide Plan. background information as the plan moves through the process.The Comprehensive Plan Update is anticipated to take up a lot of staff time in the next two years. Liaison Comments: Click here to enter text. City Manager Comments: Click here to enter text. Progress Report: Click here to enter text. Initiative Council Charge ! Target Completion Budget Required Staff Support Required ❑ 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 DateStaff Liaison)) (Staff Liaison) ❑ New Initiative ❑ Continued Initiative ❑ Ongoing Responsibility Click here to enter Click here to enter Click here to enter text. Click here to enter text. text. text. Liaison Comments: Click here to enter text. City Manager Comments: Click here to enter text. Progress Report: Click here to enter text. City of Edina, Minnesota- Intranet: City to Continue Study of Braemar Winter Rec. Page 1 of 2 `4‘ - 'Ile CITY of 0..i EDINA Thursday, September 08, 2016 Study Continues for Braemar Winter Rec. By Scott Neal The City Council began its work on Sept. 7 in its capacity as the City's Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The HRA held a closed session to discuss a potential sale of HRA-owned real estate at 4416 Valley View Road. The HRA discussed the possible sale of the property, but took no action at this time to sell the site. Following the completion of the HRA meeting, the Council met in joint session with the Community Health Commission to discuss matters of mutual concern, including the Commission's work plan and a new initiative the commission wants to pursue in Edina that would increase the legal age to purchase tobacco products. Following the work session, the Council met in regular session and made the following decisions: • Appointed Russ Rubin to the Arts& Culture Commission, Trevor Mohs to the Park Board, Amanda Herr to the Community Health Commission, and Jim Nelson to the Human Rights & Relations Commission. • Approved the final version of the Grandview District Transportation Study. • Approved an amendment to the City's Bias Offense Response Plan. • Authorized the HRA to levy a property tax in 2017. • Approved an $187,188 contract with Motorola Solutions for the purchase of new radios to replace remaining Police Department mobile radios, encrypt remaining Police Department portable radios and to replace all Fire Department mobile radios. • Established Oct. 5 as the date of a public hearing to certify special assessments, delinquent utilities and assorted other municipal charges and fees. • Approved an amendment to the contract with golf course architect Richard Mandell to provide$230,000 for on-site construction management services during the Braemar Golf Course renovation project. • Awarded a $100,000 contract to Play Power LT Farmington/Little Tykes to replace the existing playground structure at Weber Park with new playground equipment. The removal of the existing playground equipment will start in mid-September. Construction is scheduled to begin in late September. The project is slated to be completed by the end of October. • Approved a final rezoning and site plan at 4528 and 4530 France Avenue for Orion Investments. • Approved a final rezoning and final development plan for 3901 W. 70th St. for EFrance 2 LLC. • Approved a continuance to the Council's Oct. 5 meeting a proposal to approve a final rezoning and development contract for the Lincoln Residences project at 5901 Lincoln Drive. • Received an annual report presentation from Explore Edina, the City's convention and visitor's bureau. • Received an annual report from Bonnie Paulsen, City of Bloomington's Director of Public Health. Paulsen told the Council about the recent national accreditation of the Bloomington Public Health program, which also serves the cities of Richfield and Edina. https://extranet.edinamn.gov/index.php?section=Council-meeting-summaries&prrid=482&p... 9/8/2016 City of Edina, Minnesota-Intranet: City to Continue Study of Braemar Winter Rec. Page 2 of 2 • Conducted a public hearing for the proposed Braemar Winter Recreation program. After two hours of public hearing, and two more hours of additional discussion, the Council directed staff and the Park Board to begin the process of master planning Braemar Park and to include nordic ski trails, mountain bike trails, snow shoe trails, walking trails, extensive buckthorn removal and tree replacement. The 2017 budget includes funding to create a Braemar Park master plan. The Council's direction does not include construction of ski trails up the ridge line of Braemar's east hillside or the equipment/infrastructure associated with making artificial snow. • Conducted a sketch plan review of the proposed redevelopment of 6600-6800 France Ave. The Council provided feedback to the developer and encouraged the developer to move forward with a formal application. Following the completion of the City Council meeting, the Council met in its capacity as the HRA and made two decisions: approved the establishment of a new property tax levy for the HRA and approved a request to fund design services for a preliminary study of the Grandview Green. Return to list. ©2016 City Of Edina, Minnesota https://extranet.edinamn.gov/index.php?section=Council-meeting-summaries&prrid=482&p... 9/8/2016 PLANNING COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S 0 N D Work Session Work Session #of Mtgs. Attendance% Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 NAME TERM (Enter Date) (Enter Date) Hobbs, Steve 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 88% Olsen,Jo Ann 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 100% Lee, Susan 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 94% Platteter, Michael 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 100% Bennett,Jimmy 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 94% Hamilton,John 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 100% Thorsen,Todd 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 100% Strauss, Gerard 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 94% Nemerov, Ian 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 100% Ma,Amy 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 88% Kivimaki, Peter 1 9/1/2016 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 I 1 I 1 11 111111 11 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 16 1 100% 1 Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers&attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held(ON MEETINGS'LINE) Attendance Recorded(ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type"1"under the month on the meetings' line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type"1"under"Work Session"on the meetings'line. Type"1"under"Work Session"for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members'lines. `A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given,the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting.