Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016-11-15 City Council Regular Meeting
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Tuesday, November 15, 2016 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting. V.Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes of November 1, 2016 Closed Work Session and November 1, 2016 Regular Meeting B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 11/03/2016 TOTAL: $2,072,853.82 C.Resolution No. 2016-113 Requesting an Advance from Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Fund D.Approve Retaining Wall Agreement E.Request for Purchase: Engineering Services for Parklawn Avenue - Final Design and Construction Administration F.Authorize Professional Services, Presidents’ Area Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 2 Design & Construction Services G.Change Order: Contract ENG 16-5 Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction H.Resolution No. 2016-117 Final Plat & Development Contract: 7700 France Avenue for Frauenshuh Companies I.Request for Purchase: GIS Enterprise Agreement J.TraEc Safety Report of October 7, 2016 VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations VII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eEcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.Public Hearing: Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-443, Resolution No. 2016- 114 B.Public Hearing: Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-439, Resolution No. 2016- 115 VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Cost Sharing Agreement - 4500 Valley View Road B.Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Passenger Rail Service in Edina C.Resolution No. 2016-116 Accepting Donations D.Sketch Plan Review: 7711 Computer Avenue for DJR Architects E.Approve funding for Centennial Lakes Bridge Replacement Project IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Receive Petition Requesting Alley Paving B.Correspondence C.Minutes 1.Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission September 27th, 2016 2.Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission, September 15, 2016 3.Minutes: Park Board Meeting, October 10, 2016 4.Minutes: Heritage Preservation Board, October 10, 2016 X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor and Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments XIII.Schedule of Meetings and Events as of November 15, 2016 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliJcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes of November 1, 2016 Closed Work Session and November 1, 2016 Regular Meeting Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft November 1, 2016 Closed Work Session Minutes Draft November 1, 2016 Regular Council Meeting Minutes Page 1 REVISED MINUTES OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 1, 2016 5:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communication & Technology Services Director; Debra Mangen, City Clerk;, Scott Neal, City Manager; Dave Nelson, Police Chief; Kevin Rofidel, Police Lieutenant; and Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager. III. MOTION TO CLOSE MEETING Member Bringle made a motion to close the work session of the City Council as permitted by MS.13D.05 subdivision 3(b) to consult with legal counsel regarding pending litigation. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Motion carried. IV. PENDING LITIGATION REVIEWED WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – CLOSED SESSION Attorneys Mark Hodkinson, Brian Gaviglio and Roger Knutson consulted with the City Council regarding the pending litigation. Motion by Member Staunton seconded by Member Stewart to move back into open session. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Motion carried. V. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 15, 2016. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 1, 2016 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT Sandy Williams, 5221 France Avenue S., Minneapolis, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Bob Melander, 6025 Killarney Lane, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Greg McAndrews, 4401 Parklawn Avenue, #301, commended the Police Department and Director of Engineering for their service. Mary Melander, 6025 Killarney Lane, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Jeff Woodcock, 5117 Bedford Avenue, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Chadborne Whiting, 7161 France Avenue, #206, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Janet Doudiet, 5701 Code Avenue, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. David Sanchez, 6329 Millers Lane, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Tom Brower, 5400 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Patrice Nelson, 411 Van Buren Avenue S., addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Chris Rofidal, 5037 W. 56th Street, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Kathy Christensen, 7205 Lanham Lane, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 1, 2016 Page 2 Judy Heimkes, 5310 Malibu Drive, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Nancy Frykman, 6028 Schaefer Road, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Charlie Snyder, 5501 Wooddale Avenue, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Franklin Heino, 303 Second Street S., Buffalo, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Pat Teynor, 5525 Malibu Drive, addressed the City Council regarding the October 12, 2016 police incident. Mayor Hovland thanked all for their opinions, stating each was important and the Council will continue to deal with this incident. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the consent agenda, as follows: V.A. Approve regular meeting minutes of October 18, 2016 V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 20, 2016, and consisting of 32 pages; General Fund $189,509.59; Police Special Revenue $18,543.81; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $3,416.72; Arts and Culture Fund $3,450.00; Working Capital Fund $241,402.48; Cando Fund $13,358.68; Art Center Fund $3,129.48; Aquatic Center Fund $281.26; Golf Course Fund $9,648.75; Ice Arena Fund $6,216.91; Sports Dome Fund $105.89; Edinborough Park Fund $4,102.92; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $792.56; Liquor Fund $191,559.33; Utility Fund $333,345.68; Storm Sewer Fund $249,373.50; Recycling Fund $37,184.67; Risk Management $305,263.89; PSTF Agency Fund $5,792.59; Payroll Fund $10,616.40; TOTAL $1,627,095.11 and for receipt of payment of claims dated October 27, 2016, and consisting of 28 pages; Cash Company $24.94; General Fund $182,014.15; Police Special Revenue $1,335.45; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $42,227.80; Working Capital Fund $581,294.03; PIR Construction Fund $41,897.48; Art Center Fund $2,603.53; Golf Dome Fund $6,544.21; Aquatic Center Fund $130.43; Golf Course Fund $6,807.55; Ice Arena Fund $89.59; Sports Dome Fund $13.12; Edinborough Park Fund $822.13; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,917.09; Liquor Fund $146,925.43; Utility Fund $317,166.98; Storm Sewer Fund $380,102.89; PSTF Agency Fund $2,308.35; TOTAL $1,717,225.15; and, Credit Card Transactions dated July 25 – August 24, 2016; TOTAL $51,759.40 V.C. Approve Temporary Intoxicating On-Sale Liquor License for Bethlehem Academy for November 18, 2016 from 5:50-10 p.m. V.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-109; Blake Lane Final Plat and Development Contract V.E. Adopt Resolution No. 2016-110; Setting Public Improvement Hearings for Birchcrest A and Countryside B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction V.F. Approve the Service Line Warranty Program V.G. Request for Purchase for Contract ENG 16-11NB – 2016 Street Patching Repairs, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Northwest Asphalt at $44,893.00 V.H. Request for Purchase for Rehabilitation of Wells 4 and 15, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Keys Well Drilling Co. at $13,240.00 for Well 4 and $12,280.00 for Well 15 V.I. Request for Purchase for Fiber Connection to Creek Valley Water Tower, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, C.I. Utilities at $41,227.00 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 1, 2016 Page 3 Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Mayor Hovland recognized and thanked City employee Peter Saabye for 30 years of service to the City. He then welcomed Hennepin County Commissioner Jan Callison. VI.A. HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONER JAN CALLISON UPDATE – RECEIVED Hennepin County Commissioner Callison provided an update and rationale for a 4.49% increase in the 2017 tax levy. The impact of this levy increase would be $10 per year for a median valued Hennepin County home of $256,000 and a decrease of $54 per year for a median valued Edina home of $458,000. The Council thanked Commissioner Callison for her work on behalf of the City. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VII.A. PARKLAWN AVENUE ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-444 – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-111 ADOPTED Engineer Presentation City Engineer Millner presented the City-initiated Parklawn Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Project from France Avenue to W. 76th Street, noting it impacted 24 properties. Since Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds would be used to cover a portion of the costs, the project needed to meet additional standards. Mr. Millner pointed out the location of two curves that would not meet those minimum standards so variances were requested and granted. Mr. Millner described existing roadway conditions and proposed improvements. The overall project was estimated at $1,949,000 compared to the CIP estimate of $1,700,000. The additional costs were associated with the street portion of the project. He noted funding for the project would be a combination of special assessments, MSA, Three Rivers Park District, City Utility Fund, and Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety funds. There are 386.75 Residential Equivalent Units (REUs) so the preliminary Parklawn Avenue assessment was estimated at $568 per REU. Mr. Millner indicated staff had analyzed the project and found it was necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. Mr. Millner answered questions of the Council related to the project, REU calculation, and described boulevard widths that accommodated available right-of-way. He explained Parklawn Court was not included as it involved a different funding source and would be 100% assessed. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. Public Testimony Greg McAndrews, Parklawn Avenue Property Association Secretary, 4401 Parklawn Avenue, #301, addressed the Council. Dianne Kelley, 4401 Parklawn Avenue, #305-W, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Millner addressed issues raised during public testimony, indicating the design for reduced lane widths would result in lower speeds and additional advisory signage of 25 mph would be posted at the curves. The Council asked staff to address the opportunity for additional landscaping to create a residential atmosphere. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 1, 2016 Page 4 Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-111, Ordering Improvement for Parklawn Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No. BA-444. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN REVIEW, AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES AT 7700 FRANCE AVENUE – APPROVED – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-112 & ORDINANCE NO. 2016-17 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Frauenshuh Companies to redevelop a 17.1-acre parcel at 7700 France Avenue with a multi-phase development. The first phase would be a 68,000 square foot medical office and construction of freestanding parking ramp. The second phase would include construction of a 10-story 190,000 square foot addition to the Twin City Orthopedic building and three additional levels to the parking ramp. The third phase would include a restaurant in the northeast corner of the site. Mr. Teague stated the request was for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the existing PUD-8, Planned Unit Development for 7700 France to allow a doubling of the density; Site Plan Review for the Twin Cities Orthopedic building; and, Preliminary Plat approval to divide off a lot for Twin Cities Orthopedic. In addition, the proponent was requesting setback flexibility to pull the building slightly up to Minnesota Drive and 77th Street and for parking lot height. Mr. Teague indicated the Planning Commission recommended denial on a 4-3-1 split vote, as it found this proposal to be more traditional residential rather than campus with the size and massing of the parking ramp; preferred the ramp to be pulled to the street; was concerned with spacing between the parking ramp and building; and, the proposal would not follow the principles of the Greater Southdale Area. Mr. Teague described enhancements made by the proponent to address the Commission’s concerns. He presented the primary issues related to this consideration and justification for staff’s recommendation of approval and that the proponent construct the sidewalk as part of Phase 1. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council related to the plat request, dedication of easement along the northern border to accommodate utilities, and significant improvements made to the site plan along 77th Street and Minnesota Drive. The Council indicated support to maintain the north south connection for future development of the site. Proponent Presentation Dr. David Holte, Twin Cities Orthopedics, 4010 West 56th Street, described the company, its growth, and significant commitment to Edina. He stated they would like to expand in Edina, noting this project would create about 100 new jobs. Dave Anderson, Frauenshuh Companies, 7101 West 78th Street, provided a project overview, and vision to grow a local company. Nick Sperides, Sperides Reiners Architect, Inc., described challenges with the site and how the principles of the Southdale Area Planning Framework were overlaid. He addressed the building and ramp positioning, north south and east west vehicular points of access, pedestrian ways, additional greenspace and landscape buffers, site infrastructure, enhanced lighting, and architectural vision. Mr. Sperides answered questions of the Council and indicated an updated landscaping plan addressing the area between the ramp and existing building and an enhanced lighting plan would be submitted. The Council expressed interest in creating a point of entrance off Minnesota Drive and enhancements on the northern parking lot elevation after Phase 2. Mr. Sperides explained that while an option, an exterior Minutes/Edina City Council/November 1, 2016 Page 5 ramp screen would require a heavier foundation and it would greatly increase costs to shrink the parking ramp footprint and build higher. Mr. Anderson described the north property line pedestrian easement, a dedication of 18,000 sq. ft., to create a link and framework for a boulevard-style sidewalk. He suggested allowing adequate time to develop the pedestrian easement and gain neighborhood input as it would be a regional element. Mr. Anderson listed the contributions proposed by Twin City Orthopedics and Frauenshuh Companies. If approved by the Council tonight, they would return on November 15, 2016 for consideration of the Final Site Plan and Plat. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:21 p.m. Public Testimony Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Addressing an issue raised during public testimony, Mr. Sperides stated the survey was conducted by a licensed professional and surveyor monuments were identified on the corners. He displayed the survey and pointed out the monuments, noting since a lot subdivision was involved, the County would also conduct a review. Attorney Knutson indicated the City relied on a registered land surveyor to complete proper work and case law and statutes were not ignored. Manager Neal confirmed the City had the same survey requirements as other cities. The Council discussed the perpetual non-exclusive pedestrian easement. Mr. Anderson indicated proposed Condition 5 related only to the contribution of land and not to the improvement. The Council determined to address Phase 2 after additional detail had been submitted. Mr. Teague recommended, if the Council supported the PUD, it should be conditioned on the proponent constructing the sidewalk. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-112, Approving a Zoning Ordinance Amendment subject to the 14 conditions detailed in the Resolution and revising Condition 5 to require the applicant to construct the sidewalk during Phase 2; Site Plan Review for Phase 1; Preliminary Plat at 7700 France Avenue; and, grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2016-17, An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance to Revise the PUD- 8, Planned Unit Development-8 District at 7700 France Avenue. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council discussed timing of Phase 2, noting this motion would require dedication of the easement at this time but delay sidewalk construction to Phase 2. Mr. Millner estimated this sidewalk construction would cost $100,000 to $240,000. Member Staunton stated support for the project but indicated he could not support the motion as he wanted sidewalk construction included with Phase 1. Member Swenson stated she also supported the project and her rationale was that the extended density was part of Phase 2. Member Brindle stated support for the project and the proponent constructing the sidewalk. Member Stewart mentioned the challenges with developing this site and indicated he supported a smaller parking ramp footprint. Member Stewart stated, like Member Staunton, he could not support this motion as he would like the developer to construct the sidewalk with Phase 1. Member Swenson withdrew her motion and Member Brindle withdrew her second to that motion. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-112, Approving a Zoning Ordinance Amendment; Site Plan Review for Phase 1 and Preliminary Plat at 7700 France Avenue, subject to the following: Minutes/Edina City Council/November 1, 2016 Page 6 1. The site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Site plan dated September 26, 2016 Grading plan date stamped September 13, 2016 Submittal of a revised Landscape Plan based on the plan discussed at the City Council meeting on November 1,2016. Utility plans date stamped September 26, 2016 Building elevations date stamped September 13 and 26, 2016 Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 3. The applicant shall construct a boulevard style sidewalk along 77th Street and Minnesota Drive. 4. When the restaurant on France Avenue is built, the property owner shall reconstruct the sidewalk on France Avenue into a boulevard style sidewalk from Minnesota Drive to the north lot line. 5. The applicant shall construct the east-west sidewalk along the north lot line within the trail easement area during Phase 1. Final construction plans for a sidewalk are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. This sidewalk shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy for the new medical building. 6. Provision of code compliant bike racks (14 spaces minimum) near the building entrances. 7. The final lighting plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 8. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 9. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District’s requirements. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering’s memo dated October 6, 2016. 11. A shared parking arrangement for use of all parking spaces by both parcels. 12. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD-8, Planned Unit Development for this site. 13. The Final Plat must be considered within one year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 14. Public trail and sidewalk easement shall be established along the north property line from the west property line to France Avenue. And to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2016-17, An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance to Revise the PUD-8, Planned Unit Development-8 District at 7700 France Avenue. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council applauded the Planning Commission for its consideration that resulted in additional enhancements. The Council acknowledged this was an incremental consideration and supported contemplating parking ramp façade screening concepts during Phase 2. The Council thanked Twin Cities Orthopedics for expanding its practice in Edina and commended Frauenshuh Companies for its response to the City’s concerns. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. SUBDIVISION WITH VARIANCES FOR KYLE LITWIN ON BEHALF OF YOUNG KIM AT 5845 KELLOGG AVENUE – DENIED – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-106 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Young Kim for a Subdivision; Lot Width Variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; Lot Area Variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,709 square feet for each lot; and, a Side Yard Setback Variance from 5 feet to 4.7 feet for the existing structure Minutes/Edina City Council/November 1, 2016 Page 7 at 5845 Kellogg Avenue. Mr. Teague noted to the west, lots were plated in 50-foot widths and over time, some have been combined. This application was to subdivide a 100-foot lot back to the original 50-foot lots; however, the existing house would then not meet the setback requirement. Since this area was mostly comprised of 50-foot lots, the median calculation of lots was essentially the same as proposed with lot area being slightly over. Mr. Teague provided a history of similar subdivision requests over the past ten years, noting two had been denied in an area of mixed lot widths, similar to the property under consideration. He then reviewed the primary issues of consideration, noting the Planning Commission recommended denial on a 7-1 vote based on the rationale that a reasonable use of the property existed today, there were a variety of lot sizes on this block, and there was not a hardship to support the variance. He explained staff recommended approval based on past approval of a similar lot subdivision on Concord. Mr. Teague noted a previous property owner made a similar request in 1994 that was denied by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to construction of a second story on a non- conforming structure. Mr. Millner described the topography of the lot and requirement for a drainage swale directed towards 59th Street. Public Testimony Drew Beson, 5844 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Josie Fisher, 5901 Kellogg Avenue, addressed the Council. Susan Aura, 4015 West 56th Street, #308, addressed the Council. Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council acknowledged that while there were mixed lot sizes in the immediate vicinity, it was concerned with the requested lot subdivision as it involved a corner lot, created a nonconforming building, there were drainage concerns, and lack of a hardship with the property. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-106, Denying a Preliminary Plat with Variances at 5845 Kellogg Avenue. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. NEW ON-SALE WINE AND 3.2 MALT LIQUOR LICENSES, BARNS & NOBLE CAFÉ, LLC - APPROVED Clerk Mangen presented the On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor Licenses request of Barns & Noble Café, noting all requirements had been met. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving a new On-Sale Wine and 3.2 Malt Liquor Licenses for Barns & Noble Café, LLC, 3230 Galleria Shopping Center, for a period beginning November 2, 2016 and ending March 31, 2017. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 1, 2016 Page 8 Representatives of Barns & Noble Café stated they were excited about this opportunity in Edina, described offerings at this full-service restaurant, and thanked the Council for its unanimous approval and show of support. Member Brindle left the dais at 10:40 p.m. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2016-113 ADOPTED – ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2016-113 accepting various grants and donations. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Absent: Brindle Motion carried. Member Brindle returned to the dais at 10:43 p.m. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. ARTS & CULTURE COMMISSION, JUNE 23, 2016 2. ARTS & CULTURE COMMISSION, JULY 28, 2016 3. ARTS & CULTURE COMMISSION, AUGUST 25, 2016 4. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, SEPTEMBER 8, 2016 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, authorizing Manager Neal and Mayor Hovland to draft a letter on behalf of the Edina Housing Foundation relating to concerns about the Minnesota Finance Housing Association’s potential changes to affordable housing and tax credit policies. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS AND DATES AS OF NOVEMBER 1, 2016 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, November 15, 2016. James B. Hovland, Mayor Minutes/Edina City Council/November 1, 2016 Page 9 Video Copy of the November 1, 2016, meeting available. Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 11/03/2016 TOTAL: $2,072,853.82 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Claims Pre-List Dated 11/03/2016 TOTAL: $2,072,853.82 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3887 11/3/2016 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 73.60 415196 2056053 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 132.40 415420 2059578 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MDC YORK SELLING 206.00 3888 11/3/2016 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 49.99 COFFEE 415604 1251783 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 80.46 WATER FILTER 415603 1251784 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 130.45 3889 11/3/2016 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 163.10 415430 55820400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.10 415200 55921700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 243.10 415201 55921800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 360.65 415434 55982100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 330.20 415428 55982300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 'VERNON SELLING 412.75 415432 55982800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 221.55 415433 56016200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 91.55 415431 56021700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,176.75 415429 56021800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 81.31 415202 94794700 5842.5515 ' COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,154.06 3890 11/3/2016 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 83.59 PAPER, PENS, STAPLER 00002256 415244 WO-233784-1 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 83.59 3891 11/3/2016 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 33.53 ENVELOPES 415391 122955 1495.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS INSPECTIONS 26.14 415124 123330 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 59.67 3892 11/3/2016 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 8,220.00 SOUTHDALE TOWER P.M. 415125 0195458 05394.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SOUTHDALE WATER TOWER REHAB 1,005.00 SANITARY SEWER REHAB 415534 0196030 03493.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Presidents Neighborhood 9,225.00 3893 11/3/2016 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR 1,350.00 OFFICIATING FEES 415536 2-10/16 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP 1,350.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check 0 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 0 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3894 11/3/2016 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. Continued... 4,111.04 DISPATCH WALL DISPLAYS 00003080 415394 FMX8819 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 4,111.04 3895 11/3/2016 105693 CITYSPRINT 35.26 COURIER SERVICE 415252 37315 9238.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 35.26 3896 11/3/2016 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 577.20 415454 67-884 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 577.20 3897 11/3/2016 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 103.50 PUBLISH NOTICE 415346 421543 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 51.75 PUBLISH NOTICE 415347 421544 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 155.25 3898 11/3/2016 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 2,244.00 CATCH BASIN IRON 00001795 415258 VV8458 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,244.00 3899 11/3/2016 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 73.98 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 415555 OCT 2016 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 93.42 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 415554 SEPT 2016 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 167.40 3900 11/3/2016 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 135.06 THERMAL ROLLS 415145 144530 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 135.06 3901 11/3/2016 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 192.25 FIELD PAINT 00001793 415270 114101 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 192.25 3902 11/3/2016 120085 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 721.27 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 00005786 415147 8254 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 721.27 3903 11/3/2016 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 348.61 BOOTS 00003866 415407 230972 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 348.61 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 6 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3903 3904 11/3/2016 11/3/2016 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. Continued... 11,306.27 ABOUT TOWN PRINTING 415558 673837 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 11,306.27 3905 11/3/2016 103217 LHB, INC. 3,088.79 GV TRANSPORTATION STUDY 415152 150515.00-11 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 3,088.79 3906 11/3/2016 100858 LOGIS 633.00 415186 42371 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,633.00 415186 42371 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 4,294.00 415186 42371 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 4,594.00 415186 42371 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 4,840.00 415186 42371 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 6,367.00 415186 42371 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 6,639.00 415186 42371 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 6,175.00 415186 42371 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 35,175.00 3907 11/3/2016 101483 MENARDS 35.76 5 GAL BAG STRAINER 00001554 415279 21324 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 26.41 WASHERS, BOLTS, NUTS 00001613 415155 22555 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 267.72 TOOLS 00001634 415156 23063 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 58.95 FURRING STRIPS 415157 23319 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 75.68 POWERLOCK TAPES, STRETECH WRAB001665 415158 23713 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 30.46 SAW BLADE 00001778 415159 25286 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 10.99 CIRCULAR VALVE BOX 00001797 415408 25699 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19.97 FAN SWITCH 00001806 415160 25772 450008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Arneson Acres Greenhouse 51.54 HARDWARE 00001815 415280 26039 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 36.77 BUCKET ORGANIZER, KNEEL PAD 00001817 415281 26043 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 44.39 CONCRETE FOAM MATERIAL 00001822 415282 26150 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 658.64 3908 11/3/2016 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 442.20 LINERS, TISSUE, DETERGENT 00003865 415163 38730 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 477.60 LINERS, WIPES 415162 38731 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 919.80 3909 11/3/2016 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 8 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3909 11/3/2016 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. Continued... 22,543.33 MORNINGSIDE/WHITEOAKS 415611 102716 07135.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Morningside A & White Oaks C 186,848.00 MORNINGSIDE/WHITEOAKS 415611 102716 01422.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 4,771.40 MORNINGSIDE/WHITEOAKS 415611 102716 01438.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2016 Recon White Oaks C 15,921.62 MORNINGSIDE/WHITEOAKS 415611 102716 03492.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Momingside A & White Oaks C 180,699.00 MORNINGSIDE/WHITEOAKS 415611 102716 05558.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Morningside A & White Oaks C 91,571.84 MORNINGSIDE/WHITEOAKS 415611 102716 04416.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Momingside A & White Oaks C 502,355.19 3910 11/3/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 250.08 TIRE 415290 210255815 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 250.08 3911 11/3/2016 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 549,28 TISSUE, LINERS, TOWELS 415415 10899 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 343,65 NAPKINS 415292 10998 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 503.52 TOWELS, GLOVES, LINERS 415292 10998 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 359.10 LINERS, TISSUE, WIPES 415416 11026 5765.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PROMENADE EXPENSES 1,755.55 3912 11/3/2016 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 58.50 BUSINESS CARDS 415358 92593 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 58.50 3913 11/3/2016 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 3,865.00 PLOW AND ASSEMBLIES 00005193 415581 40855 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 3,865.00 3914 11/3/2016 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 191.88 COUPLING, NIPPLE 00005708 415180 8496289 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 191.88 3915 11/3/2016 119454 VINOCOPIA 120.00 415227 0164111-IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 223.25 415227 0164111-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 129.00 415228 0164112-IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 99.00 415521 0164358-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 101.50 415520 0164360-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 672.75 3916 11/3/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3916 11/3/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 1,759.70 415229 17537 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 504.25 415524 18204 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,050.35 415522 18219 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 686.13 415523 18224 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,000.43 408977 11/3/2016 139020 A E CONRAD COMPANY 1,310.00 ROOF & SIDING 415365 5082 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,310.00 408978 11/3/2016 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 245.00 SAFE DRIVING CLASSES 415338 102116 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 245.00 408979 11/3/2016 129458 ACME TOOLS 75.08 BAL DUE 415233 4186450 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 99.99 LEVEL 00001762 415234 4479165 5932.6556 TOOLS GENERAL STORM SEWER 41.94 HATS 415236 4497314 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 198.75 GLOVES 415235 4498778 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 415.76 408980 11/3/2016 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS 130.00 SEPT 2016 COBRA ADMIN FEES 415532 C42257 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 130.00 408981 11/3/2016 135342 ALLEGRA MIDWAY 109.94 SCHEDULING BOOKS 415237 45561 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 109.94 408982 11/3/2016 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 125.00 WATER FILTER 415238 116105 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 125.00 408983 11/3/2016 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 60.00 IAFCIO DUES 415110 102516 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.00 408984 11/3/2016 139400 ANDERSON, DARLENE 88.21 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415187 37432780 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.21 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 408984 408985 11/3/2016 11/3/2016 139400 ANDERSON, DARLENE 137556 ARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE Continued-. 14,100.00 SOUTHDALE VISION MODEL 415239 201624 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 14,100.00 408986 11/3/2016 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 88.88 415197 3134021 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,002.85 415198 3134022 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,783.45 415199 3134023 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 385.00 415421 3135593 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,311.00 415422 3135595 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 33.12- 415423 361676 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.78- 415425 361677 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6.66- 415424 361995 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6.66- 415426 362648 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,502.96 408987 11/3/2016 106304 ASPEN MILLS 460.30 UNIFORMS 00003804 415384 179389 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 454.30 00003804 415385 179390 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 349.32 00003804 415386 183133 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 94.78 00003812 415387 183355 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 158.85 00003777 415388 183542 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 288.70 00003818 415389 184920 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,806.25 408988 11/3/2016 138747 ATOMIC RECYCLING 898.00 ROOF & SIDING 415366 194436 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 264.00 ROOF & SIDING - DEMO 415367 197791 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,162.00 408989 11/3/2016 120995 AVR INC. 202.75 READY MIX 415111 136838 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 622.75 415112 136839 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 835.00 415113 136988 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,356.00 415114 137332 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 876.50 415116 137875 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,356.00 415115 137876 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 665.50 415117 138237 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 2,288.50 READY MIX 415118 139075 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 408989 11/3/2016 120995 AVR INC. Continued... 2,107.00 415119 139176 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,744.00 415120 139275 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 2,107.00 415241 139396 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 593.50 415240 139489 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 14,754.50 408990 11/3/2016 139422 BALL, STEPHANIE 120.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415589 304 JEFFERSON 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 120.00 408991 11/3/2016 139423 BARNES, MICHAEL 75.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415590 5536 VILLAGE DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 75.00 408992 11/3/2016 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 159.50 BATTERIES 00001826 415533 018-418144 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 159.50 408993 11/3/2016 136267 BAUHAUS BREW LABS LLC 325.50 415427 11716 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 325.50 408994 11/3/2016 129549 BEHLEN, NATE 90.80 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415242 102516 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 90.80 408995 11/3/2016 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING 10,320.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002546 415122 488527 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 11,040.00 SEWER/WATER REPAIR 00002594 415123 A205809 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 8,173.00 SEWER/WATR REPAIR 00002552 415121 A208357 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A 29,533.00 408996 11/3/2016 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 432.00 PIZZA 415243 4656801 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 288.00 PIZZA 415390 4658055 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 720.00 408997 11/3/2016 125139 BERNICK'S 192.40 415435 326062 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 408997 11/3/2016 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 192.40 408998 11/3/2016 125209 BISEK, KATIE 216.54 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 415392 102816 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 216.54 408999 11/3/2016 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 20,615.00 CREEK VALLEY TENNIS COURTS 00001968 415245 10525 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 20,615.00 409000 11/3/2016 135784 BLAKE, PATRICIA 115.86 MAH JONG CLASS SUPPLIES 415339 102016 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 115.86 409001 11/3/2016 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 88.74 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415246 102516 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 88.74 409002 11/3/2016 122248 BUCK ART MATERIALS 195.39 ART SUPPLIES 415393 193166 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 195.39 409003 11/3/2016 102852 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHEILD OF MN 1,319.20 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415188 38883344 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,319.20 409004 11/3/2016 131967 BOLLIG & SONS 2,500.00 4629 56TH ST DEMO ESCROW 415340 ED150178 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 409005 11/3/2016 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 746.50 415203 137053 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 591.58 415437 137235 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 958.95 415436 137244 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,297.03 409006 11/3/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,544.47 415440 1080545717 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 146.30 415441 1080545721 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,137.60 415442 1080545722 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409006 11/3/2016 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 1,943.07 415439 1080545723 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,122.14 415438 1080545797 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,984.03 415447 1080545798 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 111.44 415444 1080545799 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 289.05 415446 1080545802 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,025.60 415443 1080545803 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.15 415445 1080545834 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 113.09- 415448 2080152700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 'VERNON SELLING 94.26- 415449 2080152727 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13,169.50 409007 11/3/2016 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 5,773.05 415205 1090628837 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 824.27 415204 1090628838 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,102.20 415206 1090628839 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,429.40 415451 1090629883 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 51.00 415450 1090629884 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14,179.92 409008 11/3/2016 111706 BREDEMUS HARDWARE CO. 400.00 LOCK REPAIR 415535 601544 5520.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA CONCESSIONS 400.00 409009 11/3/2016 122195 BRUNSWICK ZONE - EDEN PRAIRIE 72.80 BOWLING FEES 415126 1839621 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 46.80 415127 1839623 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 119.60 409010 11/3/2016 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION 1,920.00 MNJIS JULY-SEPT 2016 415341 359533 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,920.00 409011 11/3/2016 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 624.20 415452 1046321 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,442.80 415453 1046322 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,067.00 409012 11/3/2016 134591 CARON, KRYSTAL 60.00 REIMBURSE FOR IPAD CASE 415537 102716 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 60.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409012 11/3/2016 409013 11/3/2016 134591 CARON, KRYSTAL 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 34.13 10089900-4 415247 10089900-10/16 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 92.97 10437426-9 415538 10437426-10/16 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 851.11 5546504-1 415249 5546504-10/16 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,354.14 5591458-4 415248 5591458-10/16 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 22.34 9546705-6 415250 9546705-10/16 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 718.54 9724639-1 415539 9724639-10/16 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GRO1JNDS 4,073.23 409014 11/3/2016 105497 CENTRAL ROOFING CO. 8,225.00 ROOF LEAK REPAIRS 415395 15731 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8,225.00 409015 11/3/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 128.94 952 831-0024 415605 0024-10/16 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 55.35 952 920-1565 415342 1565-10/16 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.64 952 920-1586 415343 1586-10/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 82.32 952 922-2444 415344 2444-10/16 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 59.64 952 920-8632 415540 8632-10/16 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 385.89 409016 11/3/2016 100683 CHEMSEARCH 666.08 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 415541 2479885 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 666.08 409017 11/3/2016 101663 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA 120.00 MEMBERSHIP 415606 2016 & 2017 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 120.00 409018 11/3/2016 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 52,438.50 LPH CONTRACT 415251 13292 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 52,438.50 409019 11/3/2016 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 133.33 SR CENTER MAG COUPON 415542 COM-1043 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 133.33 SR CENTER MAG COUPON 415542 COM-1043 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 133.34 SR CENTER MAG COUPON 415542 COM-1043 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 100.00 SMPSTF PHONE/INTERNET 415543 DELETF 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 500.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - I I Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409019 409020 11/3/2016 11/3/2016 122317 CITY OF EDINA- COMMUNICATIONS 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Continued... 86.44 00121223-0200819007 415128 200819007-10/16 9232.6189 SEWER & WATER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 86.44 409021 11/3/2016 128041 CLARKE, BRIAN 100.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415396 102816 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 100.00 409022 11/3/2016 120433 COMCAST 24.86 8772 10 614 0023973 415130 23973-10/16 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 33.91 8772 10 614 0373022 415129 373022-10/16 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.77 409023 11/3/2016 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 935.20 BRAEMAR GOLF ADVERTISING 415397 CW16526 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 935.20 409024 11/3/2016 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 18,049.58 HOT MIX 415253 101516 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 18,049.58 409025 11/3/2016 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 215.02 MATERIALS TESTING 415131 P00006511 07129.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 5129 CORNELIA DR SIDEWALK 300.16 MATERIALS TESTING 415131 P00006511 01399.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON TRACY AVE 1,246.65 MATERIALS TESTING 415131 P00006511 01430.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 1,761.83 409026 11/3/2016 139424 CONNELL, RICHARD 150.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415591 4713 SCHOOL RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 150.00 409027 11/3/2016 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 567.00 DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES 00001623 415134 0147736-IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 58.83 BONDING AGENT, MOTAR 00001626 415132 0147737-IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 386.10 CONCRETE FORM RELEASE AGENT 00001650 415133 0147738-IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 156.16 24" EASY FORMS 00001805 415135 0150036-IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,168.09 409028 11/3/2016 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409028 11/3/2016 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. Continued... 1,400.44 CLAY, SUPPLIES 00009508 415398 INV000111578 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,400.44 409029 11/3/2016 139425 CORNERSTONE RELOCATION GROUP 80.00 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415592 7201 SHANNON DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 80.00 409030 11/3/2016 102332 CRAWFORD DOOR SALES OF THE TWIN CITIES 240.25 DOOR REPAIR 415544 23939 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 240.25 409031 11/3/2016 103833 CROW-HASSAN NURSERY L.L.C. 6,750.00 TREES 415545 3205 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 6,750.00 409032 11/3/2016 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 1,564.25 QUARTERLY CONTRACT 415255 3114377 5710.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,564.25 409033 11/3/2016 100130 DAKOTA COUNTY 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 415254 102616 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 409034 11/3/2016 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 5,679.38 RINK LUMBER 00001698 415546 1610-652387 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,679.38 409035 11/3/2016 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE 845.00 PULVERIZED BLACK DIRT 415136 100116 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 845.00 409036 11/3/2016 139401 DARLENE STILLPASS REVOCABLE TRUST 1,773.42 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415189 38645024 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,773.42 409037 11/3/2016 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,764.05 NOV 2016 STD PREMIUMS 415547 F018342-11/16 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,764.05 409038 11/3/2016 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO ii Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409038 11/3/2016 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Continued... 69.90 CUT-OFF WHEELS 00005743 415257 131465 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.83 CRIMPING PLIERS, TORCH 00001809 415256 132935 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 100.73 409039 11/3/2016 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 10,554.56 SEPT 2016 SURCHARGE 415345 25860053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 10,554.56 409040 11/3/2016 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 24.50 650487671 415548 650487671-10/16 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 24.50 409041 11/3/2016 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 3,604.70 ROAD PAINT 00001652 415137 802170211 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 3,604.70 409042 11/3/2016 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES INC. 1,076.25 CHEMICALS 00005328 415549 827001545-16 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,076.25 409043 11/3/2016 139421 DVS 1,902.12 LICENSE PLATE FEES 415607 102616 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,902.12 409044 11/3/2016 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 431.20 BRACKETS 00001766 415138 0112620-IN 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 431.20 409045 11/3/2016 101656 EDINA CHORALE 325.00 FULL PAGE ADS 415399 EDINA ART 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTER 325.00 409046 11/3/2016 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 90.80 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 415139 LC102016-100 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.80 409047 11/3/2016 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 1,079.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003758 415140 1854641 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,079.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409047 11/3/2016 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 409048 11/3/2016 139204 ERICKSON, BARBARA M 57.65 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415593 4613 CONCORD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET TER 57.65 409049 11/3/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 33.56 LINKS 415261 1-5107878 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.71 BATTERY 415262 1-Z09032 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 335.60 ROTORS, BRAKE KITS 415259 69-243256 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.95 SENSOR 415260 69-243500 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.61 OIL 415550 69-243984 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.95 OIL 415551 69-243989 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.98 NITRILE GLOVES 415552 69-244167 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 550.36 409050 11/3/2016 139415 FEASTER, JESSE 1.02 DAILY ADMISSIONS REFUND 415400 EDINBOROUGH PK 5700.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET 13.98 DAILY ADMISSIONS REFUND 415400 EDINBOROUGH PK 5701.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 15.00 409051 11/3/2016 139407 FIELDSTONE FAMILY HOMES INC. 2,500.00 6217 RYAN NEW HOME ESCROW 415312 ED144522 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 7,500.00 6217 RYAN CO ESCROW REFUND 415313 ED 147681 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 409052 11/3/2016 119211 FIRSTLAB 381.70 DRUG SCREENING 415553 FL00157302 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 381.70 409053 11/3/2016 134850 FISHER, DAVID 622.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 415401 102816 1495.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE INSPECTIONS 622.08 409054 11/3/2016 102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC. 31,254.90 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 415311 101716 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 46,461.70 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 415311 101716 07116.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S116 VERNON AVE NORTH SIDE 195,831.72 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 415311 101716 07111.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S-111 INTERLACHEN BLVD 273,548.32 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409055 11/3/2016 139426 GAARD, MICHAEL Continued... 25.90 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415594 5201 RIDGE RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 25.90 409056 11/3/2016 139427 GAFFNEY, JAMES 9.86 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415595 4209 44TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 9.86 409057 11/3/2016 139402 GIESCHEN, HULDA R. 1,526.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415190 36867264 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,526.00 409058 11/3/2016 139115 GONYEA HOMES 2,500.00 5624 ZENITH- NEW HOME ESCROW 415348 ED142061 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 7,500.00 5624 ZENITH TEMP CO ESCROW 415349 ED146839 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 409059 11/3/2016 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 405.00 VEHICLE GRAPHICS 00005193 415263 110805 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 405.00 409060 11/3/2016 101103 GRAINGER 1,781.28 415268 9244120474 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 759.78 AIR FILTERS 00002253 415264 9245309621 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,781.28- 415269 9245772315 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 7.14 PIPE INSULATION 00001791 415265 9254985378 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 7.86 PIPE INSULATION 00001791 415266 9255109226 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 199.92 LIGHT BULBS 00002258 415403 9255109234 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8.62 PIPE INSULATION 00001791 415267 9255580939 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 30.07 BA1 1ERIES 00002259 415402 9256214942 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,013.39 409061 11/3/2016 120201 GRANICUS INC. 500.00 SPEAK UP EDINA 415141 80986 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 690.00 WEBSTREAMING 415141 80986 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,190.00 409062 11/3/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 328.50 415456 MN00011585 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 505.00 415455 MN00011646 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 833.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409062 409063 11/3/2016 11/3/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 132968 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES INC. Continued... 2,500.00 5120 SKYLINE NEW HOME ESCROW 415315 ED142718 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 1,600.00 6708 CORNELIA DR DEMO ESCROW 415314 ED144470 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 7,500.00 5120 SKYLINE TEMP CO ESCROW 415316 ED150028 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 11,600.00 409064 11/3/2016 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 369.00 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION SYSTEM 00001734 415142 164576 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 157.40 415143 164660 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 197.00 415144 164661 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 723.40 409065 11/3/2016 139403 GROE, ROBERT V. 23.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415191 37051915 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 23.00 409066 11/3/2016 139428 HANSON, SCOTT 41.80 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415596 4513 PARKSIDE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LA 41.80 409067 11/3/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,504.98 RADIO FEES - SEPT 2016 415351 1000082100 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,192.44 RADIO FEES - SEPT 2016 415350 1000082101 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,697.42 409068 11/3/2016 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 6,200.00 FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR COURSE 415608 00359337 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 6,200.00 409069 11/3/2016 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 154.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003839 415404 34786989 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 154.50 409070 11/3/2016 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 332.63 SANITIZER, DEFOAMER 00002261 415405 602284877 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 332.63 409071 11/3/2016 102483 HILTI INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409071 11/3/2016 102483 HILTI INC. Continued... 169.89 ADHESIVES 00001644 415146 4608279377 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 169.89 409072 11/3/2016 128215 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA 3,250.00 TREES 415556 7465 01399.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON TRACY AVE 3,250.00 409073 11/3/2016 128215 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA 17,577.41 FRANCE AVE/HAZELTON RD 415557 102116 01259.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS FRANCE AVE LANDSCAPE PLAN 17,577.41 409074 11/3/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,096.00 415457 856978 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,699.83 415458 857141 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 47.00 415459 857142 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,842.83 409075 11/3/2016 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 90.56 REPAIR SUPPLIES 00001736 415271 3070002 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 90.56 409076 11/3/2016 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 331.56 CHLORINE, ACID 00002257 415406 161018008 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 331.56 409077 11/3/2016 138077 HURST, JAMES 1,640.30 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 396121 154920 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,640.30 409078 11/3/2016 139230 HYDE, HELEN 88.21 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415192 38990910 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 88.21 409079 11/3/2016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 1,113.93 415460 44850 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,113.93 409080 11/3/2016 139417 J & A GLASS & MIRROR INC. 5,265.00 ROOF & SIDING 415368 16235INV 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,150.00 ROOF & SIDING - DOORS 415370 16325INV 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409080 11/3/2016 139417 J & A GLASS & MIRROR INC. Continued... 215.00 ROOF & SIDING - GLASS 415369 18178INV 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 6,630.00 409081 11/3/2016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 27.00 415207 2552434 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,337.65 415462 2581926 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 126.40 415461 2581929 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 7,647.03 415464 2581934 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 152.60 415463 2581935 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 78.00- 415465 2581939 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 10,212.68 409082 11/3/2016 138425 JOELSON, ERICA 41.04 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 415272 102616 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 41.04 409083 11/3/2016 138216 JOHN KRAEMER AND SONS 2,500.00 5112 JUANITA NEW HOME ESCROW 415352 ED144736 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 409084 11/3/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 802.44 415214 5567399 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,119.06 415213 5567400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,733.63 415212 5567401 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,799.63 415211 5567404 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.16 415210 5568639 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 708.80 415209 5568640 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 308.71 415208 5568641 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 150.15 415215 5568642 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 465.35 415480 5572828 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.96 415474 5572832 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 54.21 415471 5572834 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 49.20 415470 5572835 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 260.94 415481 5572836 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 427.46 415482 5572838 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,394.31 415466 5572840 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 725.29 415467 5572842 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,255.27 415475 5572843 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 114.86 415469 5572845 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,645.60 415472 5572847 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGISIOI CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409084 11/3/2016 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,609.22 415473 5572849 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 838.92 415468 5572850 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,679.76 415478 5572855 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,222.76 415477 5572859 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,625.63 415479 5572860 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 252.86 415476 5572862 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 46.32- 415219 592058 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 21.99- 415217 594263 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4.00- 415218 594405 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 53.76- 415216 594551 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 87.83- 415483 597376 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37,038.28 409085 11/3/2016 138749 JSH CONSTRUCTION LLC 228.00 ROOF & SIDING - ACADEMY BLDG 415371 881 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 228.00 409086 11/3/2016 116901 KC. GROVES TREE EXPERTS 1,592.07 TREE REMOVAL 415609 4901 COUNTRY 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE CLUB 1,592.07 409087 11/3/2016 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 33.74 SEALS 00005706 415274 Y931635 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.42 SLEEVES 00005706 415273 Y931641 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.16 409088 11/3/2016 139378 KAMINSEN, STEPHEN 102.06 UTILITY REFUND -FINAL 415597 6128 WILRYAN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 102.06 409089 11/3/2016 130057 KIRK ACOUSTICS INC. 950.00 ROOF & SIDING - INTERIOR 415372 32110 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 950.00 409090 11/3/2016 100285 KLAPPERICK, TERRY 19.00 CDL RENEWAL 415353 102416 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 19.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409091 11/3/2016 139404 KNUTSON, DORIS L. Continued... 1,687.21 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415193 39027099 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,687.21 409092 11/3/2016 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 9,855.28 ALGAE TREATMENTS 415148 151712 5933.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES 9,855.28 409093 11/3/2016 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 408.84 SCREWS, WASHERS, NUTS 00001667 415149 9304396157 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 209.43 NUTS, WASHERS, TYRAP 00005693 415150 9304441836 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 618.27 409094 11/3/2016 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 30,266.00 LMC DUES 415151 238673 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 30,266.00 409095 11/3/2016 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 28,536.34 WORKERS COMP 415559 3RD QTR - 2016 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 28,536.34 409096 11/3/2016 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 800.00 CLAIM# CA 000000017406 415560 1601 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 800.00 409097 11/3/2016 139416 LIW INC. 3,402.00 ROOF & SIDING - ENTRANCE 415373 26113 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 3,402.00 409098 11/3/2016 135277 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC. 38.97 SAFETY GLOVES 415153 0250129-IN 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 38.97 409099 11/3/2016 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12,215.37 UNLEADED FUEL 415277 813046 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,587.43 UNLEADED FUEL 00005761 415275 813058 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,364.98 DIESEL FUEL 415276 817385 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 396.70- CREDIT 415278 CM-018433 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18,771.08 409100 11/3/2016 138850 MARKIR SERVICES INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check 4 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 6 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409100 11/3/2016 138850 MARKIR SERVICES INC. Continued... 520.00 GRAFITTI REMOVAL 415154 2447 4090.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 520.00 409101 11/3/2016 105297 MAYER ELECTRIC CORP. 252.00 ROOF & SIDING - ELECTRIC 415375 103861 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 478.00 ROOF & SIDING - ELECTRIC 415374 61301RT 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 730.00 409102 11/3/2016 104366 MENDEL, NATHAN 105.81 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415409 102716 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 105.81 409103 11/3/2016 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 83.73 WHEEL ASSEMBLY 00005766 415283 500529 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.73 409104 11/3/2016 100890 MIDWEST AQUA CARE 5,629.00 POND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 415161 2016 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5,629.00 409105 11/3/2016 130635 MILLNER, CHAD 274.32 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 415561 101916 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 274.32 409106 11/3/2016 139418 MINNESOTA HOCKEY 4,400.00 ICE RINK DIVIDERS 415562 2016-124 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,400.00 409107 11/3/2016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 22.10 HALLOWEEN POSTERS 415284 21316 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 22.10 HALLOWEEN POSTERS 415284 21316 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 44.20 409108 11/3/2016 132597 1VIDC1V11 BRANDS INC. 96.00 FROZEN YOGURT 415410 2932 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 96.00 409109 11/3/2016 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 153.54 CONSTRUCTION STORAGE 415610 9001130684 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 153.54 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409109 409110 11/3/2016 11/3/2016 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP Continued... 12.32 BUSHINGS 00005712 415563 545486F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.32 409111 11/3/2016 139429 MORRIS, DAVID 126.56 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415598 6124 EWING AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 126.56 409112 11/3/2016 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 64,105.25 FIRE DEPT MOBILE RADIOS 00003076 415354 13127927 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 101,471.50 MOBILE RADIOS 00003076 415356 13128918 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 3,889.50 PORTABLE RADIO - SCHMITZ 00003077 415355 13129730 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 169,466.25 409113 11/3/2016 139420 NATIONALAUTO FLEET GROUP 28,651.86 2016 CHEV COLORADO 00005193 415564 37968787 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 28,651.86 409114 11/3/2016 133207 NATIONAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. 286.39 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415195 36754215 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 286.39 409115 11/3/2016 139430 NEUMAN, ROBERT 70.73 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415599 5816 61ST ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 70.73 409116 11/3/2016 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 187.00 415220 114411 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 187.00 409117 11/3/2016 102551 NFPA 128.30 FIRE PREVENTION HANDOUTS 00003863 415164 6818899Y 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 128.30 409118 11/3/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. 318.00 LED BULBS FOR PROMENADE 00001783 415165 98517 5765.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE EXPENSES 116.00 BULBS 00001799 415166 98623 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 82.50 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00001801 415411 98624 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 516.50 R5SCKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409118 11/3/2016 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 409119 11/3/2016 124528 NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 3,300.00 COURSE TUITION 415565 SFT0000111903 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 3,300.00 409120 11/3/2016 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 313.20 LIGHTS 00005695 415566 42266 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 313.20 409121 11/3/2016 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 155.58 RECORDER REPAIR 415167 IN69393 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 103.04 FOOT CONTROL 415357 IN69494 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 258.62 409122 11/3/2016 138294 NORTON HOMES LLC 9,725.00 5113 GROVE ST NEW HOME ESCROW 415530 ED145135 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 7,500.00 5113 GROVE ST TEMP CO ESCROW 415531 ED149967 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 17,225.00 409123 11/3/2016 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 857.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 415568 869717873001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 19.98 FOLDERS 415567 869718391001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 877.78 409124 11/3/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 130.91 ZIPLINE ROPE 415285 584907 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 21.55 CABLE 00001803 415286 589949 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 87.36 LIFTING ACCESSORIES 00001812 415569 590059 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 239.82 409125 11/3/2016 139431 OVERSTREET, KARIN 417.12 UTILITY REFUND -FINAL 415600 7004 LEE VALLEY 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 417.12 409126 11/3/2016 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 1,543.75 STRACHAUER PK NEIGHBORHOOD 415309 102016 07138.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Strachauer Park A 37,025.20 STRACHAUER PK NEIGHBORHOOD 415309 102016 01421.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2016 RECON STRACHAUER PK 132,151.08 STRACHAUER PK NEIGHBORHOOD 415309 102016 03495.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Strachauer Park A 170,720.03 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409127 11/3/2016 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING Continued... 80.58 CATERED FOOD 415412 10343 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 68.08 415413 10359 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 111.46 415414 10360 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 260.12 409128 11/3/2016 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 15.82- 415489 8566625-CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 429.70 415484 8567080-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 352.95 415485 8567093-IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 352.50 415488 8567106-IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 571.75 415487 8567109-IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 137.25 415486 8567110-IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,828.33 409129 11/3/2016 102963 PELUF,JIM 9.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415570 102616 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 9.99 409130 11/3/2016 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 133.03 415287 99698260 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 133.03 409131 11/3/2016 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 525.00 LAWN REPAIR AT 5908 GROVE ST 415571 313 05552.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Countryside H Reconstruction 525.00 409132 11/3/2016 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 275.00 EDITION EDINA 415572 101916-1 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 275.00 409133 11/3/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS .09 415222 2060905 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 268.64 415225 2060906 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 74.49 415226 2060910 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,730.20 415223 2060911 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,404.63 415224 2060912 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 362.32 415221 2061711 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5.80 415491 2064667 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 449.55 415490 2064670 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.96 415497 2064672 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 - Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409133 11/3/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 654.89 415495 2064673 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,304.21 415499 2064674 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 544.13 415498 2064675 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.96 415494 2064678 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 393.14 415492 2064679 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 161.68 415493 2064681 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 140.28 415496 2064805 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 74.49- 415500 248465 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 81.16- 415501 249105 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,352.32 409134 11/3/2016 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,216.05 REPLACEMENT PLANTS 415288 338935 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 415289 339242 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4,439.91 409135 11/3/2016 118747 POTTERS INDUSTRIES LLC 6,180.00 GLASS BEADS 00001651 415168 91060777 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 6,180.00 409136 11/3/2016 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 34.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415291 102516 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 34.99 409137 11/3/2016 100380 PRESTRUD, ROBERT 30.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415573 102616 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.00 409138 11/3/2016 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 415612 103116 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 409139 11/3/2016 117016 RAYCO CONSTRUCTION INC. 28,255.00 ROOF & SIDING - DEMO 415376 160132 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 575.00 ROOF & SIDING - ROOF 415377 161493 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 28,830.00 409140 11/3/2016 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 407.30 BRAKE PAD KIT 00005703 415169 10293MN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 407.30 R55CKR2 LOGISIOI CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409140 409141 11/3/2016 11/3/2016 132392 RED POWER DIESEL SERVICE 134496 REFINED LLC Continued... 2,500.00 3512 FULLER ST NEW HOME ESCROW 415574 ED141939 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 409142 11/3/2016 139405 REGINA E. CHRISTOPHER - TRUSTEE 64.66 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 415194 39027104 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 64.66 409143 11/3/2016 125936 REINDERS INC. 1,474.72 FERTILIZER 00002013 415171 3042375-00 5765.6540 FERTILIZER PROMENADE EXPENSES 699.25 PESTICIDE 00002013 415170 3042521-00 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,458.00 FERTILIZER 00001792 415575 3042567-00 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 3,631.97 409144 11/3/2016 106036 REITER, JERRY 103.84 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415576 102516 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 103.84 409145 11/3/2016 139188 REVOLUTIONARY SPORTS LLC 1,032.50 SPORTS FEES 415577 EDI-BR 2016-2 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 1,032.50 409146 11/3/2016 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 2,458.00 DASHERBOARD SALES COMMISSION 415172 916151-8 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 2,458.00 409147 11/3/2016 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH 397.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415293 102116 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 397.50 409148 11/3/2016 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 428.00 SAFETY HARNESS 415578 BRAEMAR ARENA 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 428.00 409149 11/3/2016 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 36.78- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 415173 0402373069350 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 23.98 POPCORN 415173 0402373069350 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP 58.96 PAPER 415173 0402373069350 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 46.16 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409149 409150 11/3/2016 11/3/2016 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 103015 SCHEERER, JOHN Continued... 256.93 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415294 102516 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 256.93 409151 11/3/2016 132076 SCHERBER CO. LLC 2,500.00 5020 EDINBROOK DEMO ESCROW 415317 ED151179 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 409152 11/3/2016 100995 SEH 9,650.99 BRAEMAR WINTER RECREATION 415295 320545 47099.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Braemar Winter Recreation 944.31 BRAEMAR WETLAND MONITORING 415174 321839 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 26,521.48 415296 322996 47099.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Braemar Winter Recreation 37,116.78 409153 11/3/2016 139432 SEIFERT, APRIL L 16.52 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415601 5840 ABBOTT AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 16.52 409154 11/3/2016 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 844.50 OCT 2016 ADMIN FEES 415579 008816-10/16 6002.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 844.50 409155 11/3/2016 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 TRASHROOM FLOOR CLEANING 415175 56405 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,650.00 415176 56406 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,650.00 415177 56451 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 4,950.00 409156 11/3/2016 105763 SHAW STEWART LUMBER CO. 152.15 ROOF & SIDING - LUMBER 415380 648649-001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 388.36 ROOF & SIDING - LUMBER 415378 652181-001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 481.59 ROOF & SIDING - LUMBER 415379 653611-001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 17.69 ROOF & SIDING - LUMBER 415381 660645-001 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,039.79 409157 11/3/2016 101556 SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS 43.60 SHREDDING SERVICES 415178 8121095071 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.60 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check 4 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 4 Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409158 11/3/2016 120784 SIGN PRO Continued... 149.00 DASHER BOARD ADVERTISING 415418 10929 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 149.00 409159 11/3/2016 131543 SIGNCRAFTERS 12,600.00 DOWN PAYMENT FOR SIGNAGE 00007002 415359 52596DP 47093.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK SIGNAGE IMPRVMNT PROJECT 12,600.00 409160 11/3/2016 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 579.07 FIRE ALARM MONITORING 415297 789943446 5710.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 579.07 409161 11/3/2016 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 62.32 POST HOLE DIGGER 415298 78106259 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 62.32 409162 11/3/2016 129587 SOLBERG, DAVID 230.48 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415580 102716 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 230.48 409163 11/3/2016 133343 SONUS INTERIORS INC. 1,375.00 ROOF & SIDING - INTERIOR 415382 379277 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,375.00 409164 11/3/2016 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 976.30 415505 1467737 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 539.51 415504 1467739 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 101.60 415502 1467740 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 28.00 415514 1467741 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 72.80 415503 1467743 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,357.03 415513 1467745 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 530.40 415511 1467747 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,910.53 415510 1467748 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 128.80 415512 1467749 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,683.60 415506 1467750 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 540.16 415507 1467752 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,157.60 415508 1467754 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 236.60 415509 1467756 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14,262.93 409165 11/3/2016 100181 SPEEDY KEYS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409165 11/3/2016 100181 SPEEDY KEYS Continued... 80.00 KEYS 415300 161616 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.00 409166 11/3/2016 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 375.96 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 415299 ACCT 1808753 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 375.96 409167 11/3/2016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 197.75 415515 12998 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 356.00 415516 13017 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 553.75 409168 11/3/2016 128371 STEINMETZ, ROBERT 725.43 EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT 415360 MEALS/MILEAGE 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 725.43 409169 11/3/2016 127520 STREETER & ASSOCIATES 2,500.00 5125 GORGAS -NEW HOME ESCROW 415361 ED144664 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 409170 11/3/2016 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 1,176.60 TIRES 00005696 415582 10142434 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 424.88 TIRES 415301 10142541 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,601.48 409171 11/3/2016 133163 SUPERIOR PAINTING & DECORATING INC. 11,320.00 ROOF & SIDING - PAINTING 415383 16055 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 11,320.00 409172 11/3/2016 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 584.52 CONCESSION PRODUCT 415363 610112802 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 394.41 CONCESSION PRODUCT 415364 610182869 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 488.41 CONCESSION PRODUCT 415417 610210698 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 145.21 AQUATIC CENTER 415362 END OF SEASON 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,612.55 409173 11/3/2016 101025 TAMARACK MATERIALS INC. 180.03 ACOUSTIC TILE 00002554 415302 7126734-00 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 180.03 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409174 11/3/2016 106673 TAPCO Continued... 2,367.12 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK SIGNS 00001653 415179 1542265 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 2,367.12 409175 11/3/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1,049.27 415517 1161757 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 164.80 415518 1164186 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,214.07 409176 11/3/2016 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC 233.00 415519 5418 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 233.00 409177 11/3/2016 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 183.00 SIGNAL RELAYS 00001780 415181 94177 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 12,961.50 TRAFFIC CABINET 00001547 415583 94265 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS 13,144.50 409178 11/3/2016 103973 ULINE 1,100.57 FOLDING TABLES 00002260 415419 81181407 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,100.57 409179 11/3/2016 139419 UNDERTONE MUSIC 200.00 VO CLASS - L. BIUNNO 415584 103116 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 409180 11/3/2016 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 5,742.00 BALL VESTS 00003537 415182 31735-2 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 5,742.00 409181 11/3/2016 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC. 142.80 LIGHT TOWER 00001794 415303 141428478-001 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 142.80 409182 11/3/2016 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 111.98 FIELD PAINT 00001673 415304 1501-005393 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 111.98 409183 11/3/2016 127291 URBAN COMPANIES LLC 74,746.02 CORNELIA DR SIDEWALK 415310 101216 07129.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S129 CORNELIA DR SIDEWALK 74,746.02 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/3/2016 -- 11/3/2016 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409183 11/3/2016 127291 URBAN COMPANIES LLC Continued... 409184 11/3/2016 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 508.06 LIQUOR BAGS 415183 402962-00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 508.06 409185 11/3/2016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 147.57 CONDUIT 415184 1785823 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 77.44 TIME CLOCK PARTS 00001767 415305 1891285 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.96 LIGHTING 00001789 415585 1906972 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 255.97 409186 11/3/2016 137833 VIKING TROPHIES AWARDS & RECONGNITION 402.25 IQS AWARDS 415185 127421 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 402.25 409187 11/3/2016 137134 WEIERS, STEVE 154.99 SAFETY BOOTS 415586 102716 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 263.14 UNIFORM PURCHASE 415586 102716 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 418.13 409188 11/3/2016 139433 WILCOX, ELIZABETH 64.61 UTILITY REFUND - FINAL 415602 5712 DREW AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 64.61 409189 11/3/2016 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 186.32- 415232 710078 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .58 415231 7103999 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,022.80 415230 7104002 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 372.64 415529 7105013 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 299.48 415525 7105014 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 721.16 415527 7105016 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 571.68 415528 7105018 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,162.65 415526 7105019 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,964.67 409190 11/3/2016 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 23.51 LIGHTING CONTROL 00001813 415306 13797500 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.51 409191 11/3/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:32 Council Check Register by GL Page- 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 11/3/2016 -- Inv No 11/3/2016 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 409191 11/3/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 2,690.41 51-6840050-6 415319 520847915 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 14.91 51-0010619811-5 415321 521051946 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 33.85 51-0223133-2 415333 521069343 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 18.33 51-0160483-1 415332 521069650 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 134.05 51-5938955-6 415334 521161190 5937.6185 LIGHT & POWER INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 49.69 51-6541084-2 415320 521166053 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.86 51-0010118404-0 415322 521205951 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 100.19 51-9770164-7 415336 521206372 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 81.34 51-0010166207-2 415323 521210239 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15.69 51-0010573385-0 415325 521213387 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 15.63 51-0010573502-3 415326 521214789 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.62 51-0010573384-9 415324 521218424 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 86.17 51-0010619455-3 415327 521219129 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 15.27 51-0010777228-2 415328 521222226 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 29.00 51-0010876028-0 415330 521224103 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 24.35 51-0010876012-2 415329 521224119 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 50.36 51-0011004217-3 415337 521225148 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 23.46 51-0011457579-9 415587 521243354 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 26.78 51-9770163-6 415335 521245735 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 54.14 51-0011270406-5 415331 521247016 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 38.52 51-0011289291-5 415588 521248768 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 8,688.97 51-6644819-9 415318 521336151 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 31,000.33 51-4621797-2 415613 521664933 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 8,651.25 51-6955679-8 415614 521873279 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 51,888.17 409192 11/3/2016 101091 ZIEGLER INC 30.52 SWITCH 00005697 415308 PC001827724 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.56 VALVE 00005697 415307 PC001827725 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 210.08 2,072,853.82 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/PACH Payment Total Payments 1,485,659.83 587,193.99 2,072,853.82 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 11/1/2016 11:13:38 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 1 11/3/2016 - 11/3/2016 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 04500 CANDO FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 09238 SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 09900 PAYROLL FUND 390,545.62 5,742.00 176,764.72 525,854.61 4,771.40 202,609.65 19.97 1,920.83 276.12 58,083.09 10,577.40 761.22 31,336.29 8,480.07 134,192.56 352,039.93 104,849.47 34,070.34 9,883.99 14,186.44 3,088.79 35.26 2,764.05 Report Totals 2,072,853.82 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date f i Finance Director Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2016-113 Requesting an Advance from Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Fund Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2016-113 requesting advance from Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Fund. INTRODUCTION: The City of Edina is allocated approximately $1,600,000 annually for MSA construction projects. Recall with the volume of projects on our state aid network last year, we advanced $800,000 for 2016. This means our annual allocation for 2017 with be approximately half of the full allocation. Staff is proposing to request advance funding to fund the Parklawn Avenue project.Staff continues to review our MSA road reconstruction program and available funding for post 2017 years. In the near future, there will be a year or two without sufficient funding for MSA reconstruction projects. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2016-113 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-113 REQUESTING AN ADVANCE FROM THE MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET FUND FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2017 FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Municipality of City of Edina is planning to implement Municipal State Aid Street Projects in 2017 which will require State Aid funds in excess of those available in its State Aid Construction Account; and WHEREAS, said Municipality is prepared to proceed with the construction of said projects through the use of an advance from the Municipal State Aid Street Fund to supplement the available funds in their State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, the advance is based on the following determination of estimated expenditures: Account Balance as of date December 31, 2016 $000,000 2017 Estimated MSA Allocation $839,410 Estimated Account Balance January 2017 $839,410 Less estimated disbursements: Encumbrance for 2016 Projects $200,000 Project # 120-170-001 (Parklawn Ave) $1,139,410 Total Estimated Disbursements $1,339,410 Advance Amount (amount in excess of acct balance) $500,000 WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subd. 6 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 8820.1500, Subp. 10b; and WHEREAS, the Municipality acknowledges advance funds are released on a first-come-first-serve basis and this resolution does not guarantee the availability of funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Projects of the Municipality of City of Edina in an amount up to $500,000. I hereby authorize repayments from subsequent accruals to the Municipal State Aid Street Construction Account of said Municipality from future year allocations until fully repaid. Dated: November 15, 2016 Attest:__________________________________ _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor August 2015 Resolution No. 2016-113 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 15, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of ____________, 2016. ___________________________________ City Clerk Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Approve Retaining Wall Agreement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to sign retaining wall agreement with the property owner of 4708 Townes Road. INTRODUCTION: This summer, we reconstructed Townes Road as part of White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. Sidewalk changes required constructing a retaining wall at 4708 Townes Road made from lannon stone, the stone that the City uses to build all its retaining wall. The property owner requested that the City use Platteville gray limestone instead of lannon stone. Staff is concerned with the maintenance of a retaining wall made out of Platteville gray limestone; however, we've agreed to build the Platteville gray limestone retaining wall because the owner has agreed to maintain and repair the retaining wall as detailed in the attached agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Description Retaining Wall Agreement [reserved for recording data] AGREEMENT FOR RETAINING WALLS AGREEMENT made this day of , 2016, by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and Harry A. Johnson Jr. ("Owner"). RECITALS: A. Owner owns real property in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota legally described as 4708 Townes Road, Lot 004, White Oaks 2' Addition ("Subject Property"). B. The City owns a platted easement over part of the Subject Property ("Easement"). C. The City is proposing to construct a retaining wall within the City's Easement. D. The Owner has requested that the City construct the retaining wall out of Platteville gray limstone rather than lannon stone the City normally uses. E. The City is concerned with the maintenance of a retaining wall made out of Platteville gray limstone. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is agreed by the parties as follows: 1 189859v1 1. Retaining Wall. The City and Owner agree that the City will construct a retaining wall on the easement using Platteville gray limstone. 2. Maintenance. The Owner its successors and assigns agree to maintain and repair the retaining wall. If the Owner its successors and assign fail to properly maintain the wall, the City may do so and specially assess the cost of the maintenance and repair against the Subject Property. Owner its successors and assigns waive any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessment, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. Hold Harmless and Indemnity. In consideration of the City agreeing to construct the retaining wall out of Platteville gray limstone, Owner, its successors and assigns, shall indemnify and hold the City harmless from any liability caused in whole or in part by the retaining wall. 4. Recording. This Agreement shall be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. CITY OF EDINA By: James Hovland, Mayor By: Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 2 189859v1 Notary Public 3 189859v1 foregoing intrtiment washacjsno.w edged before me this cPq— day of , 2016, by /./k 1.4"AAAAAAmmwmAAAAANSHARON M. ALLISON My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2020 Notary Publio-Minnesota Not ry Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 189859v1 4 Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Engineering Services for Parklawn Avenue - Final Design and Construction Administration Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize engineering services for Parklawn Avenue final design and construction administration. INTRODUCTION: See attached Request for Purchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase Engineering Services Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 November 15, 2016 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Request for Purchase – Authorize Engineering Services for Parklawn Avenue – Final Design and Construction Administration N/A N/A Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) $288,100.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. Information/Background: Parklawn Avenue from W. 76th Street to France Avenue was approved for construction at the public hearing on Nov. 1. The project involves reconstruction of approximately half mile of roadway, new sidewalk, new trail to connect the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, new pedestrian crossings, and misc. utility upgrades. SEH has completed the preliminary engineering study and this proposal allows them to complete the project through construction. Funding for this was included in the cost estimate provided at the public hearing. Staff recommends approving the proposal with Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. G:\ENG\CONST\IMPRS\BA444 Parklawn_France-76th\ADMIN\MISC\RFP Eng Svcs.docx Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT November 7, 2016 RE: City of Edina Parklawn Avenue Roadway Reconstruction BA-444 SEH No. EDINA133115 10.00 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) is pleased to submit the attached proposal for the bid document and construction phase services of the referenced project. We are anxious to assist the City in completing the reconstruction of this Municipal State Aid street while also implementing Three Rivers Park District’s Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. If accepted, this supplemental letter agreement describes how we will provide these services for a not-to-exceed fee of $288,100.00. This amount is detailed in the attached Task Hour Budget (THB) and includes our reimbursable expenses. Similar to previous projects, we assume the City will contract independently with a materials testing company and make those services available to our field staff during construction. We will bill the City monthly for reimbursable expenses and on an hourly basis for labor. We will provide these services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. Our anticipated project production schedule is given in the table below. Anticipated Project Schedule Work Item No. Work Item Description Work Item Key Milestone Date 1 Begin Bidding Documents November 16, 2016 2 Begin Advertising for Bids February 14, 2017 3 Open Bids March 9, 2017 4 Award Construction Contract March 21, 2017 5 Begin Construction April 2017 6 Substantially Complete Construction September 2017 7 Begin Spring Punchlist/Warranty Field Reviews May 2018 8 Final Assessment Hearing September 2018 Mr. Chad Millner, PE November 7, 2016 Page 2 This Supplemental Letter Agreement, THB, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. We sincerely value our working relationship with the City and look forward to working with you and your staff on this project. Please contact me at 952.912.2616 or tmuse@sehinc.com with questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Toby Muse, PE Project Manager Enclosures p:\ae\e\edina\133115\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\final design and cps\sla ltr parklawn 11 7 16.docx Accepted on this ___day of________________, 2016 City of Edina, Minnesota By: _________________________________ Name _________________________________ Title PROJECT TASKS 1.0 Finalize Street / Pavement Design 1.1 Finalize design (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Subtotal Labor Cost $7,961 2.0 Finalize Drainage / Storm Sewer Design 2.1 Storm Sewer Extensions and New System Design (7) (8) Subtotal Labor Cost $5,115 3.0 Finalize Sanitary Sewer Design 3.1 Finalize Design (9) Subtotal Labor Cost $2,941 4.0 Finalize Water Main Design 4.1 Finalize Design Subtotal Labor Cost $3,314 5.0 Bid Document Preparation (10) (11) 5.1 Plan sheets 5.1.1 Title Sheet 5.1.2 General Layout 5.1.3 Suggested Staging Plan 5.1.4 Tabulation of earthwork 5.1.5 Tabulation of existing sanitary and storm sewer structure reconstruction or adjustment 5.1.6 Tabulation of existing sanitary sewer trunk pipe joint or spot repairs 5.1.7 Relocate one existing street light 5.1.8 Typical Pavement Sections & List of Standard Plates 5.1.9 Signing Tabulation and Plan 5.1.10 Signal Tabulation and Plan 5.1.11 Sanitary Sewer CIPP Overview Plan 5.1.12 Hydrant and Gate Valve Reconstruction Overview Plan 5.1.13 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) 5.1.14 Plan and Profile sheets (12) (13) (14) ESTIMATED COST Task Hour Budget City of Edina Parklawn Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Improvement No: BA-444 November 7, 2016 BID DOCUMENT PHASE SERVICES Page 1 of 6 PROJECT TASKS ESTIMATED COST 5.1.15 Cross Section sheets 5.2 Project Manual 5.2.1 Front End (15) 5.2.2 Conditions of Contract 5.2.3 Specifications 5.2.4 Specifications for Signal 5.2.5 Special Provisions 5.2.6 Appendix (16) Subtotal Labor Cost $45,237 6.0 Quantities and Opinion of Probable Cost 6.1 Refine Opinion of Probable Cost and Proposal Form from Engineering Study (17) 6.1.1 Street 6.1.2 Storm Sewer 6.1.3 Sanitary sewer 6.1.4 Water Main 6.1.5 Signal Subtotal Labor Cost $6,711 7.0 Agency Review / Submittals 7.1 City of Edina (18) 7.2 Hennepin County Review (19) 7.3 State Aid Project Plan Review 7.4 State Aid Hydraulic Review 7.5 Metro Transit 7.6 Private Utility Companies 7.7 Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (20) 7.7.1 Initial MCWD Coordination 7.7.2 MCWD Permit Coordination/Comments 7.7.3 QA/QC 7.8 Minnesota Department of Health 7.9 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 7.9.1 NPDES Permit/SWPPP Subtotal Labor Cost $9,693 8.0 Meetings 8.1 With City Staff 8.1.1 Design Meetings (21) 8.2 Hennepin County - Right Turn Lane & Signal System Modifications 8.3 Metro Transit - Bus Stops Subtotal Labor Cost $8,354 Page 2 of 6 PROJECT TASKS ESTIMATED COST 9.0 Bidding Assistance 9.1 Prepare Ad for Bids 9.2 Prepare Electronic Bid Documents (22) 9.2.1 Plans 9.2.2 Project Manual 9.3 Respond to Bid Inquires 9.4 Prepare necessary Addenda 9.5 Attend Bid Opening 9.6 Prepare Tabulation of Bids 9.7 Print paper copies of plans and project manual (23) Subtotal Labor Cost $5,706 10.0 Construction Staking 10.1 Provide Construction Staking Services (24) (25) Subtotal Labor Cost $15,285 11.0 RPR 11.1 Provide RPR Services (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost $107,165 12.0 Construction Administration 12.1 Construction Administration (32) (33) (34) 12.2 Provide As-built Drawings and Service Information (35) (36) 12.3 Prepare Final Assessment Roll in August 2017 12.4 Assessment Hearing (37) Subtotal Labor Cost $61,545 ESTIMATED COST Subtotal Hours 856 Subtotal Labor Cost $95,031.46 Subtotal SEH Expenses (38)$1,101.28 Subtotal $96,132.74 Subtotal Hours 1,810 Subtotal Labor Cost $183,995.29 Subtotal SEH Expenses (38)$7,971.97 Subtotal $191,967.26 $288,100.00 PROJECT COST SUMMARY CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: BID DOCUMENT PHASE SERVICES Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Includes relocating all storm sewer catch basins/piping caused by road narrowing. Repairs or replacements of existing storm sewer structures and pipes are based on recommendations from City staff and the structure condition surveys completed by SEH staff during its field inspection operations. Tabulate existing manhole or catch basin reconstruction or adjustment for inclusion in the bid document plan set. Tree removal shall only become necessary in extreme circumstances of reconstruction where no other feasible option exists to mitigate damage caused by reconstruction activities. Tabulation of earthwork for insertion into the bid documents. Includes information on a per street basis regarding gross common excavation, imported class 5 aggregate base, subgrade repairs, utility trench backfill, pavement and topsoil borrow. Create intersection grading plans. These plans will not appear in the bid document plan set. Instead they will be utilized in the field by SEH surveyors staking the reconstruction. NOTES Horizontal/vertical alignments and stationing will be assigned to Parklawn Avenue. Includes final design of typical sections at the locations shown in the Engineering Study. Includes cured in place pipe layout, tabulation of trunk pipe joint or spot repairs, and manhole reconstruction/adjustments. Roadway lighting improvements are not proposed; however, a light pole at 7450 France Avenue will need to be relocated. Includes proposed street centerline profiles for all streets. Includes profiles of existing and proposed public/private utilities. Based on input from Hennepin County during the Engineering Study phase, we assume changes to the existing signal system will be necessary at the intersection of France Avenue and Parklawn Avenue due to the addition of the dedicated right turn lane. In addition, we assume audible push button systems will be required. Task includes adding private utility line work to the base mapping. Plan view base mapping is based on line work from the topographic survey. Includes title sheet, certification sheet, table of contents, contact sheet, instructions to bidders, proposal form and advertisement for bids. Includes one (1) electronic .pdf submittal of draft final plans to the City in 11x17 plan sheet size. Includes finalization of construction quantities, unit prices and removes cost contingency. Cost splits by funding source shown in the Engineering Study will be the basis for the opinion of probable cost. Contains soil boring data, City standard plates, and SEH construction details. Includes design of a dedicated right turn lane on eastbound Parklawn Avenue at France Avenue. Page 4 of 6 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Assumes SEH will print three (3) paper copies for appropriate City and SEH staff. Includes hours to gather as-built information. This task assumes that the City will secure material inspection services and make these services available to SEH. Hours listed are estimated based on previous City street reconstruction projects and assume similar construction timeframes. The actual effort required by SEH field staff will be dictated by the contractor's schedule during construction. Includes hours to verify the control used for the topographic survey and/or set new control if needed. As-built drawing requirements concerning labeling, required data, and submittal materials will follow the City of Edina record drawing procedure. SEH will use the City’s format for a Daily Construction Report. The entire project area is located in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and will not result in a net increase in impervious surface. Includes development of Signal Justification Report (SJR), submitting for review and signature, discussions with County on Accessible Pedestrian Signal push button stations, submitting plans and technical specifications for review and addressing comments received. Bid documents will be available for purchase via Quest CDN on the City's web site. Assumes four (4) in-person design meetings to review project design related items. Construction services for signal work include staking of signal components, coordination with field staff regarding ramp construction and placements to best fit APS push buttons, punch list preparation, and final inspection. In 2017, SEH will provide 1 junior RPR for 15 hours per week in April (2 weeks), 25 hours per week in May (4 weeks), 45 hours per week in June, July, August (13 weeks), 40 hours per week in September (4 weeks), 20 hours per week in October, 15 hours per week in November (2 weeks), and 15 hours for 1 week in December. In 2018, hours are estimated to be 10 hours per week in April (1 week) and May, June and July (2 weeks per month). The Senior RPR will be utilized on a part-time basis (approximately 5 hours per week). SEH will track monthly quantities by State Aid, each separate City funding source, and utilize the City's application for payment form. Includes weekly preparation of City Extra email content as well as door hanger updates that are required during construction. Task includes scheduling and conducting a pre-construction meeting, preparation of weekly construction meeting agenda and minutes, preparing applications for payments, preparing any necessary change orders and reviewing and approving final contractor payment, paperwork and project close-out documentation. RPR duties can include providing electronic construction inspection notes of sanitary services, drainage structures, and water hydrants and gate valves using a field tablet containing standardized City templates, if available. Page 5 of 6 36 37 38 Reimbursable expenses during bid documents includes mileage and printing costs. Reimbursable expenses during construction include printing, auto allowances, mileage, and field/survey equipment. Includes assistance in preparing the final assessment roll. Assumes attendance at the assessment hearing is not necessary. Includes post processing and QA/QC of field data entered into the City's GIS database prior to final submittal to the City. Page 6 of 6 Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ross Bintner PE, Engineering Services Manager Item Activity: Subject:Authorize Professional Services, Presidents’ Area Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 2 Design & Construction Services Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize professional services for Presidents' Area Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 2, CIP 17-077 INTRODUCTION: The project serves the purpose of repairing aging infrastructure, reducing infiltration and inflow of stormwater into the sanitary sewer system, and rehabilitating a sanitary system that is troubled with backups. This items is described in greater detail in the attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Bolton & Menk Scope of Service Barr Sewer Analysis November 15, 2016 MAYOR AND COUNCIL Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager Authorize Professional Services – Presidents’ Area Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 2 Design & Construction Services, CIP 17-077 Information / Background: The project serves the purpose of repairing aging infrastructure, reducing infiltration and inflow of stormwater into the sanitary sewer system, and rehabilitating a sanitary system that is troubled with backups. This project is a continuation of CIP 15-148, constructed as ENG 15-8. The need for the project is described in the attached technical memorandum from Barr Engineering. The attached proposal from Bolton & Menk, Inc, proposes to develop plans and specifications for project areas 1 and 2 and rehabilitate as much of the system as possible under the budget described in the CIP. The proposed schedule would include design in winter 2016, and construction in the spring and summer of 2017. Project and funding source summaries follow are: PROJECT ESTIMATE ITEM COST / ESTIMATE SCHEDULE Project Design $76,300 (not to exceed) Winter 2016/17 Project Management $60,000 (estimate) Spring/Summer 2017 Construction $680,000 (estimate) Spring/Summer 2017 TOTAL $816,300 (estimate) FUNDING ITEM AMOUNT CITY COUNCIL 2017 CIP #17-077 $820,000 Not yet approved Attachments: Supplemental Letter Agreement – Bolton & Menk Technical Memorandum – Barr Engineering N:\Proposals\Edina\2017 Presidents Area Sewer Rehab\2017 Presidents Area Final Design Proposal 2016-11-01.docx November 1, 2016 Mr. Ross Bintner, P.E., Engineering Services Manager City of Edina – Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 RE: SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT Presidents Area Sewer Rehabilitation City of Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Bintner, Bolton & Menk, Inc. is pleased to present this proposal to you for professional engineering services in support of its 2017 Presidents Area Sewer Rehabilitation. As a part of this proposal, we describe our understanding of the project, detail our proposed scope of work, and provide our fees for service. This proposal is being offered as a Supplemental Agreement to our June 18, 2013 Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services with the City of Edina. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Edina completed an analysis of the sanitary sewer in the Presidents Area neighborhood, downstream of Water Treatment Plant (WTP) #4, in the northwest part of the City. This analysis was documented in a February 27, 2015 memorandum by Barr Engineering. The area begins at WTP #4 and continues south/southeast toward Blake Road/Interlachen Boulevard. The alignment of the sanitary sewer in this area is primarily located in backyards, wooded areas, next to small lakes, and in some cases under homes. According to the analysis, this area has reported back-ups into area homes and a number of the lines have been identified as under-capacity. The analysis identified three (3) areas that need improvement. Area 1 includes approximately 1,200 lf of sanitary sewer immediately downstream of WTP #4, Area 2 includes approximately 800 lf in the middle of the study area, and Area 3 includes approximately 1,200 lf running east from the Arthur Street/Waterman Avenue intersection southeast ending in Interlachen Boulevard. Improvements to Area 3 were completed during the 2016 construction season. The City is now interested in further evaluating and improving Areas 1 and 2 as identified in the Barr memorandum. As mentioned above, Areas 1 and 2 include approximately 2,000 lf of sanitary sewer beginning just downstream of WTP#4. The existing sanitary sewer within Area 1 runs east along an easement between homes, south of 2nd Street S., and then heads south along an easement, and alley area, behind homes on the east side of Harrison Avenue S. Area 2 begins at the intersection of Tyler Avenue and Maloney Avenue and works its way southeast through easements, between homes, and along City property until it reaches the intersection of Arthur Street and Waterman Avenue. City records indicate that the pipes in this area are 9-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) and the pipe grades are minimal, ranging from 0.10% to 0.36%. The Barr memorandum notes surcharging in the manholes within the study area downstream of WTP #4 during the plant’s backwash recycle process. During an onsite meeting last month with Engineering and 2017 Presidents Area Sewer Rehab November 1, 2016 Page 2 Public Works (PW) staff, it was determined that PW staff no longer discharges to the downstream gravity sanitary sewer system as a part of the backwash recycle process. Eliminating the backwash recycle flow has, in turn, eliminated the downstream surcharging it caused. Televising, previously completed by the City, of Area 1 shows the pipe in a deteriorated condition with sags, offset joints, and cracks in the pipe. A small portion of Area 2 was televised and found to be in adequate condition, the majority of Area 2 was not televised, so is assumed to be in poor condition. The City of Edina has requested this proposal from Bolton & Menk to complete final design, bidding, and construction observation and administration services in support of the Area 1 & 2 improvements. The City desires to construct both Area 1 & 2 improvements in 2017, but it is possible, depending on funding, that the construction will need to be completed, including bidding, in two phases. Bolton & Menk will evaluate a variety of construction options for the sanitary sewer line: directional drilling, pipe-bursting, and open-cut, along with possible alternative alignments (for Area 2). To facilitate these evaluations, we recommend the City have the sanitary sewer line in area 2 televised prior to beginning final design so we know what services and laterals exist along the line to help determine if alternative alignments are options. SCOPE OF WORK Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the following services: Final Design and Bidding 1. Review Televising Log 2. Survey computation and drafting support a. The City will use its own survey crews to complete the topographic field survey work. This would include location of property corners and monuments in support of necessary ROW and boundary computations. The City will furnish a point file along with point code descriptions to BMI for processing. b. BMI will complete supporting document research, calculations, ROW/boundary computations, and drafting. 3. Field confirmation of existing ground cover conditions and sewer manhole locations, conditions and accessibility. 4. Evaluate Design Alternatives 5. Prepare technical construction plans (plan and profile view from topographic survey) and specifications for sanitary sewer construction for Areas 1 & 2, as identified by Barr Engineering in their 2/27/15 memorandum. 6. Resident Communications a. Informational mailing to affected residents. b. Up to eight (8) meetings with residents to discuss specific project issues and concerns, and to negotiate temporary access to the sanitary sewer system for construction purposes. c. Conduct a neighborhood open house to discuss the final project plans and expectations during construction. 7. Identify temporary sewer bypassing needs and establish parameters for inclusion in bidding documents. 8. Complete and submit required construction permit applications (fees to be paid by City). 9. Prepare project cost estimates. 10. Prepare bidding documents. 11. Advertise project according to standard City practices. 2017 Presidents Area Sewer Rehab November 1, 2016 Page 3 12. Address contractor questions during the bidding period and distribute any necessary addenda. 13. Conduct bid opening, evaluate bids, and make recommendation for project award. 14. City progress meetings (up to 3 meetings). The City will provide Bolton & Menk with survey benchmarks, GIS files to assist in building our base map along with available televising files, and easement documentation for the utility easement along the sanitary sewer line (most of which we’ve already received). PROPOSED FEES Estimated fees for the final design and bidding services as described above are summarized as follows: Evaluate Design Alternatives / Review Televising Logs $ 3,800 Survey Computations and Drafting $ 5,400 Field Confirmation $ 3,800 Technical Construction Plans & Specifications $ 44,000 Communication with Affected Residents $ 4,900 Design Phase Open House $ 1,600 Permit Applications $ 1,500 Project Cost Estimates $ 3,300 Bidding Documents $ 2,800 Bidding Assistance $ 3,700 City Progress Meetings $ 1,500 TOTAL $ 76,300 The costs for these individual work tasks are estimates. Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the final design and bidding services for a not-to-exceed fixed fee of $76,300. Additional easement description or acquisition services, if required and/or identified as a part of final design, are not included in the above work. Construction Services 1. Facilitate execution of construction contract between City and contractor. 2. Conduct preconstruction meeting. 3. Review construction material submittals and shop drawings. 4. Conduct preconstruction neighborhood open house. 5. Provide construction staking services of mainline sanitary sewer, as necessary (new alignment). 6. Provide full time construction observation and administration services including, but not limited to, conducting weekly construction meetings, serve as a liaison between the City, its residents and the contractor, review of the work for general conformance with construction documents, review of material test results, maintenance of construction documentation, preparation of pay estimates and any necessary change orders. 7. Completion of record drawings. Bolton & Menk is prepared to provide full-time construction observation, if the City desires a different level of effort, we are prepared to adjust our levels of construction services in accordance with the City’s requests and requirements. 2017 Presidents Area Sewer Rehab November 1, 2016 Page 4 Because the consultant does not have direct control over the construction contractor’s operations or schedule, our construction observation and administration services are provided on an hourly basis. Personnel rates for anticipated staffing are as follows: Principal Engineer: $185 per hour Senior Project Manager: $153 per hour Survey Manager: $140 per hour Project Surveyor: $129 per hour Construction Observer: $125 per hour Engineering Technician: $105 per hour If you find this proposal satisfactory, your signature of this proposal will constitute acceptance of the terms outlined and your authority for us to proceed. Please call if you wish to discuss this proposal. We look forward to providing these professional engineering services to you on this project and appreciate your consideration of Bolton & Menk, Inc. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Marcus A. Thomas, P.E. Sarah E. Lloyd, P.E. Principal Engineer Project Manager ______________________________________ ______________________________ Signed Date _________________________________________ Printed Name Technical Memorandum To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Project: 23/27-1331 c: Background Over the past 10 years, one of the sanitary sewers in the northwest part of the City down stream of Water Treatment Plant #4 (WTP #4) has backed up into some homes in the area on several occasions. Backups have been reported at 300, 301, 302, and 305 Harrison Ave S and 6655 2nd Ave S. The limits of this study along with the location of the sewer experiencing the backups and the homes affected are shown on Figure #1. These backups are all in an area downstream from WTP #4, which is located in the northwest corner of Edina, near the intersection of 2nd Street and Van Buren, in Alden Park. WTP #4 includes a filter backwash system that feeds into a recycle basin. Backwash water is pumped to the basin where solids are allowed to settle. Two pumps are installed in the recycle basin, one that pumps clear water from a floating intake back to the treatment plant for reuse and one for pumping of settled sludge and solids from the bottom of the tank to waste. The sludge pumped from the recycle tank is discharged to an air gap manhole. From this point it is pumped from the air gap manhole to the sanitary sewer. Downstream of the pipe that receives sludge from WTP #4 is another area of concern. The City has noted that there is a section of 9-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sanitary sewer that runs along the north side of Mirror Lake (north of Interlachen Blvd and west of Blake Rd S) that has reduced capacity due to being lined with a smaller 6-inch high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe. No specific backup locations were identified in this area, but the City is concerned about the potential for backups due to the reduced size of the pipe and the intermittent high flows introduced by the sludge pumping from WTP #4. The objective of this memorandum is to identify the primary factors contributing to the sanitary sewer backups identified earlier and then, in the context of the other data available for this section of pipe, identify improvements that will reduce the likelihood of future backups. To do this the memorandum includes: A summary of a field investigation of the WTP #4 discharge to the sewer completed in 2009 Estimates of flows to the sanitary sewer in this area using the City’s sanitary sewer model To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 2 C:\Users\dan\Desktop\Updated\WTP #4 memo_BKL.docx An evaluation of the remaining sewer capacity, and Options and cost estimates of infrastructure improvements to reduce the risk of future backups. Summary of Previous Work In February 2009 Barr completed a brief review WTP #4 infrastructure and sanitary sewer downstream of the WTP #4 backwash recycle sludge discharge. The area studied is shown in Figure 2. As noted earlier, part of the WTP #4 infrastructure includes a backwash recycle basin. Backwash water is pumped to the recycle basin and allowed to settle. Two pumps are installed in the recycle basin, one which pumps clear water from a floating intake back to the treatment plant for reuse and one for pumping of settled sludge and solids from the bottom of the tank. The sludge and solids are pumped from the recycle tank to an air gap manhole. The sludge is then pumped from the air gap manhole to the sanitary sewer. The WTP #4 air gap manhole pump discharges into sanitary sewer manhole 1325. The sanitary sewer then flows by gravity to the east for approximately 500-ft to MH 1327. These pipes are 9-inch VCP, were installed in 1950s and are in poor condition based on televising reports provided by the City (Attachment 1). Numerous sags, blockages, and cracked joints were noted. These two sections of pipe are also located near, or possibly underneath homes on the south side of 2nd Ave S, not in the street ROW as indicated by City records. This is not a desirable location for the pipes. Any repairs work would require access to pipe on the private yards and near the existing residential structures. The sanitary sewer then heads south to MH 1315. The existing pipes are again 9-in VCP, were installed in 1950s and are in poor condition. MH 1325 was the furthest downstream portion of the system reviewed as a part of the investigation. Note that both sections of pipe noted above included areas that were laid with minimal slope. In addition to this, numerous root intrusions were also noted. As-built plans and information on the recycle basins at WTP #4 were also reviewed (Attachment 2). The plans and specifications call for a 50-gpm pump to convey water from the air gap manhole to the sanitary sewer MH 1325.On February 26, 2009 the City initiated a back wash tank recycle which resulted in discharge from the recycle tank to the sanitary sewer. Barr staff were onsite for portions of the discharge to monitor pumping from the air gap manhole and visually observe the flow in the sanitary sewer manholes downstream of the WTP #4 discharge. The backwash recycle process lasted approximately 26 hours. During that time, surcharging was observed in all manholes in the study area. MHs 1325 and 1314 surcharged above the crown of the pipes. The pumping rate from the air gap manhole was estimated by measuring the change in elevation in the tank over the time of discharge. Flow rates from the air gap manhole pump were estimated to be 120-150 gpm, significantly higher than the flowrate called for in the specifications. No backups of the sanitary sewer were reported during the backwash cycle. Samples of the discharge from the air gap manhole To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 3 C:\Users\dan\Desktop\Updated\WTP #4 memo_BKL.docx pump were also taken. At the beginning of the test, water was clear with little to no solids. By the end of the test discharge water was very turbid and contained a significant amount of solids. Discharge samples are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3 – Samples from early and late in the backwash recycle discharge collected from air gap manhole Based on the investigation, it was concluded that due to the poor condition of and low slopes in the existing pipe, the sanitary sewer downstream of WTP #4 had an actual capacity somewhere near 150- gpm. With the air gap manhole pump discharging 150-gpm, plus additional base flow from the residences, normal flows could exceed the capacity of the sewer and lead to backups. The thick sludge observed during the end of the discharge cycle is also likely contributing to the reduced capacity of the sewer. At that time three options for improvements were given to the City: Installing a VFD on the air gap manhole pump to reduce pump speed, and in turn reduce the discharge rate to the sanitary sewer, Install a valve to throttle the pump discharge to a lower rate Consider directing the discharge from the air gap manhole to a different sanitary sewer manhole where pipe capacity is greater. To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 4 C:\Users\dan\Desktop\Updated\WTP #4 memo_BKL.docx Sanitary Sewer Modeling Previous work related to the City’s sanitary sewer included the development of a computer-based sanitary sewer system model. The City’s sanitary sewer model was created in 2006 as a part of an effort to analyze system capacity under various development scenarios and to help prioritize projects to reduce inflow and infiltration to the sanitary sewer. In 2013, the model was recalibrated based on historic sanitary sewer flows from 2006-2012 (Sanitary Sewer Model Recalibration, Barr Nov. 2013). For the current analysis, the recalibrated model was used to identify existing pipe capacity for each pipe segment within the study area. Results for the modeling are shown in Figure 4 and Table 1. The existing conditions model run assumed that WTP #4 is discharging 150 gpm from the air gap manhole. Model results indicate that all of the existing 6-inch diameter pipe near Mirror Lake is predicted to surcharge, and some pipes near the discharge of WTP #4 are nearing capacity. The model does not include reduced capacity to account for the sags, roots, and other flow impediments present in the actual system, thus it is not predicting the surcharging that was been observed in the field in 2009. For use in evaluating improvements options, an additional model run was completed. In this model run pipe segments G-1782, 1783, 1784, 1772, 1773, 1774, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1290, and 1291 (Improvement areas 1 and 3) were all assumed to have been replaced and increased in size to 10-inch diameter PVC pipe. Results for this model run are shown in Figure 5 and Table 1. Model results indicate that all capacity and surcharge problems have been resolved and all pipes have greater than 50% of their theoretical capacity remaining even with the WTP #4 discharge at 150 gpm. Sewer Televising Over the course of the past few years, the City has televised most of the sanitary sewer in the study area. The City provided Barr with copies of the televising reports that were available. The reports were reviewed to determine the condition of the pipes and to aid in deciding if sections of pipe in the study area should be replaced. The videos were reviewed for general overall condition of the pipe. If significant (greater than 3”) sags, roots, offset joints or cracks were observed a pipe was labeled as deteriorated. If no major issues were observed, a pipe was labeled as adequate. For pipes where no televising report was available, it was assumed the pipe was in poor condition and needed replacement. A summary of the pipe condition in the study area is shown in Figure 6. The original sewer televising reports are included in Attachment 1. Conceptual Improvement Options and Costs Based on the televising reports, modeling of the existing sanitary sewer, and field observed conditions, three portions of the study area were identified for needing improvements: To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 5 C:\Users\dan\Desktop\Updated\WTP #4 memo_BKL.docx Area 1 - MH 1325 to MH1315 (near the WTP #4 discharge) Area 2 – MH 1319 to MH 1376 (green space between Tyler Ct. and Arthur St.) Area 3 – MH 1364 to MH 1759 (near Mirror Lake) Area 1 In Area 1, surcharging and back-ups have been reported, the televising reports showed the pipe is in a deteriorated condition, and the sanitary sewer model is showing some pipes nearing capacity. In addition to this some sections of pipe are actually located beneath homes in the area which is highly undesirable. Area 1 is shown in Figure 7. Two options were identified for improvements to the sanitary sewer in Area 1. Option 1A is to replace the existing 9-inch VCP pipe with a 10-inch PVC pipe by open cut methods. Currently the existing pipe is located underneath the homes along 2nd Ave S. The new pipe would be located in the right of way of 2nd Ave S and the existing pipe would be abandoned in place. The new pipe would allow for increased capacity in the area over the current pipe and greatly reduce the likelihood of backups from the WTP #4 discharge. A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 1A is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Option 1B is to line the existing 9-inch VCP pipe with a cast in place pipe (CIPP) and install a new forcemain from the air gap manhole south from WTP #4 to a different area of the sanitary sewer. Lining of the existing pipe downstream of WTP #4 and redirecting the flow to a different area would reduce the chances for backups near WTP #4. However lining of the existing pipe will not correct the low slopes/sags in the pipe and the pipe will still be located underneath the homes on the south side of 2nd Ave S. A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 1B is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Area 2 In Area 2 no sanitary sewer backups are known to have occurred. The pipes in this area were unable to be televised by the City and their condition is unknown. As such, to be conservative, their condition has been assumed to be deteriorated and in need up repair. Two options were identified for improvements to the sanitary sewer in Area 2. Area 2 is shown in Figure 7. Option 2A is to replace the existing 9-inch VCP pipe with a 10-inch PVC pipe by open cut methods. Currently the existing pipe is located in the yards of homes between Tyler Ct and Arthur St. The new pipe would be installed along the same alignment. The new pipe would be an improvement over the possibly deteriorated condition of the current pipe and decrease the likelihood of future backups from in the area. To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 6 C:\Users\dan\Desktop\Updated\WTP #4 memo_BKL.docx A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 2A is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Option 2B is to line the existing 9-inch VCP pipe with CIPP. Lining of the existing pipe would reduce any inflow and infiltration into the pipe and improve the flow characteristics of the pipe. However lining of the existing pipe will not correct any low slopes or sags that may exist in the pipe. A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 2B is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Area 3 In Area 3, no sewer backups are known to have occurred. However, when inspecting the sewers in the area debris was observed all the way up to the rim of the manhole. This debris indicates surcharging has occurred in the area. City records indicate that this section of sewer is 9-inch VCP. However it was confirmed during the field visit that the sewer between MH 1364 and 1759 has been slip lined with a 6- inch HDPE pipe (Figure 6). It was also noted that the manholes in Area 3 near Mirror Lake are close to the water edge. A review of the City’s storm water model indicated that the predicted 100-yr storm elevation of Mirror Lake in this area is 912.1. This elevation is close to the rim elevation of the existing manholes and well above the invert elevation of the sewer. Area 3 is shown in Figure 7. . Figure 8 - 6-inch HDPE Liner Replacement was the only option identified for improvements to the sanitary sewer in Area 3. Based on the modeling completed, the existing 6-inch pipe will not handle the predicted flows so CIPP is not an option for this area. Pipe bursting was considered, but based on conversations with local contractors, it is not believed to be feasible to burst both the 6-inch HDPE and the 9-inch VCP to install a larger pipe. Replacement of the existing pipe was assumed to be with a 10-inch PVC pipe by open cut methods. To: Mr. Ross Bintner From: Dan Nesler and Brian LeMon Subject: WTP #4 Sewer Analysis Date: February 27, 2015 Page: 7 C:\Users\dan\Desktop\Updated\WTP #4 memo_BKL.docx Currently the existing pipe is located in the backyards of homes and land owned by the City. The new pipe would be installed along the same alignment. The new pipe would be an improvement over the undersized pipe currently in place and decrease the likelihood of backups from in the area. Reconstruction of the sewer in this area would also allow for manhole rims to be raised and sealed, to minimize the risk of inflow from Mirror Lake to the sanitary sewer. A conceptual level cost estimate for Option 3A is shown in Table 2 and a cost breakdown is included in Attachment 3. Summary and Recommendations The sections of pipe reviewed were all installed in the mid 1950’s to 1960’s. All are VCP which is susceptible to cracking and brittle failure in poor soil conditions. Numerous sections of the pipe that were inspected and televised showed signs of deterioration, had significant sags, were installed at low slopes and had numerous root intrusions. Discharge from WTP #4 will occur into the future and will continue to pose a threat of additional sanitary backups if pipes are left in their current condition or flowrates are not reduced. Options exist to repair and replace segments of the pipe that are in the worst condition or that are significant contributing factors to the sanitary backups. If the City undertakes options to repair and replace the deteriorated pipe the risk of future sanitary backups will be significantly reduced. Based on discussions with the City, the City plans to complete the improvements over a period of time. It is recommended that the City prioritize improvements in Area 3 first, Area 1 second, and Area 2 third. While Area 1 is closer to WTP #4 and the previous sewer back-ups, if improvements are made here first, they may exacerbate problems in Area 3. Area 2 is prioritized last as it has no current indication of back- ups. In the short term, it is recommended that the City look into reducing the flowrate from the air gap manhole pump. This could be accomplished by any of the below options: Reducing the flowrate of the existing pump by partially closing an existing valve, if one is currently installed Installing a valve to throttle the existing pump discharge if a valve is not currently installed Installation of a VFD to reduce the speed of the existing pump, and thereby reducing the flowrate Installation of a smaller pump It is also recommended that the City consider further efforts to televise improvement Area 2. Local contractors (Infratech – Infrastructure Technologies, Inc.) may have smaller cameras that are able to access these pipes. If these pipes are televised and found to be in good condition they could be removed from the list of improvement areas. G-1776 G-1772 G-1771 G-1959 G-1964 G-1962 G-1960 G-1949 G-1951 G-2003 G -2 016 G-1290 G-1291 G-1937 G -2 0 2 3 G -2 0 2 6 G -2 0 2 4 G -2 0 2 2 G -1 7 8 4 G -1 7 9 3 G -1 9 3 2 G -1 7 7 3 G -1 7 8 7 G-1782 G -1 9 3 4 G -1 9 6 3 G-1935 G-1786 G -1 7 8 8 G -1 7 8 1 G-1941 G -1 7 9 2 G -1 9 8 6 G -1 7 7 4 G -1 9 3 3 G -1 9 3 1 G-1948 G -1 99 6 G-2021 G -1 7 7 2 G -1 7 8 0 G -2 0 0 0 G-2 020 G -1 9 5 0 G -1 7 8 9 G -1 9 7 3 G -1 9 5 6 G -1 9 9 7 G-1955 G -1 9 6 8 G-1965 G-1938 G-1975 G -1 9 5 7 G -1 9 7 4 G -2 0 0 2 G -1 9 3 6 G-1978 G -1 7 9 0 G - 1 9 8 9 G-1958 G -1 9 9 5 G - 1 9 5 4 G -2 0 2 9 G -1 9 9 8 G -1 7 9 1 G - 1 9 8 2 G -1 9 5 3 G-1771 G-1775 G - 1 7 7 0 G -1 9 6 6 G -1 9 4 7 G -2 0 2 5 G-1940 G -1 9 7 0 G-1785 G-1777 G-1980 G-1783 G -1 9 4 3 G-1969 G -2 0 3 0 G - 1 9 8 3 G-1769 G-1967 G-1939 G -2 0 2 7 G -1 7 7 9 G-1994 G - 2 0 0 7 G -1 9 4 5 G -1 9 9 2 G -1 988 G-1961 G -2 0 0 1 G -2 0 0 9 G-1985 G - 2 0 0 4 Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013 1 0 200 400 600 Feet Figure 1 Project Study Area City of Edina, MN Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.1, 2014-09-19 19:00 File: I:\Projects\23\27\G13\Maps\SAC Availability\WTP\Existing\EdinaWTP_Ex50.mxd User: mbm 1 inch = 400 feet WTP Discharge Location Pipe Evaluated in Study ") G-1776 G-1772 G-1771 G-1959 G-1964 G-1962 G-1960 G-1949 G-1951 G-2003 G -2 016 G-1290 G-1291 G-1937 G -2 0 2 3 G -2 0 2 6 G -2 0 2 4 G -2 0 2 2 G -1 7 8 4 G -1 7 9 3 G -1 9 3 2 G -1 7 7 3 G -1 7 8 7 G-1782 G -1 9 3 4 G -1 9 6 3 G-1935 G-1786 G -1 7 8 8 G -1 7 8 1 G-1941 G -1 7 9 2 G -1 9 8 6 G -1 7 7 4 G -1 9 3 3 G -1 9 3 1 G-1948 G -1 99 6 G-2021 G -1 7 7 2 G -1 7 8 0 G -2 0 0 0 G-2 020 G -1 9 5 0 G -1 7 8 9 G -1 9 7 3 G -1 9 5 6 G -1 9 9 7 G-1955 G -1 9 6 8 G-1965 G-1938 G-1975 G -1 9 5 7 G -1 9 7 4 G -2 0 0 2 G -1 9 3 6 G-1978 G -1 7 9 0 G - 1 9 8 9 G-1958 G -1 9 9 5 G - 1 9 5 4 G -2 0 2 9 G -1 9 9 8 G -1 7 9 1 G - 1 9 8 2 G -1 9 5 3 G-1771 G-1775 G - 1 7 7 0 G -1 9 6 6 G -1 9 4 7 G -2 0 2 5 G-1940 G -1 9 7 0 G-1785 G-1777 G-1980 G-1783 G -1 9 4 3 G-1969 G -2 0 3 0 G - 1 9 8 3 G-1769 G-1967 G-1939 G -2 0 2 7 G -1 7 7 9 G-1994 G - 2 0 0 7 G -1 9 4 5 G -1 9 9 2 G -1 988 G-1961 G -2 0 0 1 G -2 0 0 9 G-1985 G - 2 0 0 4 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community !;N 0 200 400 600 Feet Figure 4 SANITARY SEWER MODEL RESULTS EXISTING CONDITIONS City of Edina, MN Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.1, 2014-09-19 19:01 File: I:\Projects\23\27\G13\Maps\SAC Availability\WTP\Existing\EdinaWTP_Ex150.mxd User: mbm 1 inch = 400 feet ")WTP Discharge Location Municipal Boundary 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100 >100 Pipe Capacity (%) G-1776 G-1772 G-1771 G-1959 G-1964 G-1962 G-1960 G-1949 G-1951 G-2003 G -2 016 G-1290 G-1291 G-1937 G -2 0 2 3 G -2 0 2 6 G -2 0 2 4 G -2 0 2 2 G -1 7 8 4 G -1 7 9 3 G -1 9 3 2 G -1 7 7 3 G -1 7 8 7 G-1782 G -1 9 3 4 G -1 9 6 3 G-1935 G-1786 G -1 7 8 8 G -1 7 8 1 G-1941 G -1 7 9 2 G -1 9 8 6 G -1 7 7 4 G -1 9 3 3 G -1 9 3 1 G-1948 G -1 99 6 G-2021 G -1 7 7 2 G -1 7 8 0 G -2 0 0 0 G-2 020 G -1 9 5 0 G -1 7 8 9 G -1 9 7 3 G -1 9 5 6 G -1 9 9 7 G-1955 G -1 9 6 8 G-1965 G-1938 G-1975 G -1 9 5 7 G -1 9 7 4 G -2 0 0 2 G -1 9 3 6 G-1978 G -1 7 9 0 G - 1 9 8 9 G-1958 G -1 9 9 5 G - 1 9 5 4 G -2 0 2 9 G -1 9 9 8 G -1 7 9 1 G - 1 9 8 2 G -1 9 5 3 G-1771 G-1775 G - 1 7 7 0 G -1 9 6 6 G -1 9 4 7 G -2 0 2 5 G-1940 G -1 9 7 0 G-1785 G-1777 G-1980 G-1783 G -1 9 4 3 G-1969 G -2 0 3 0 G - 1 9 8 3 G-1769 G-1967 G-1939 G -2 0 2 7 G -1 7 7 9 G-1994 G - 2 0 0 7 G -1 9 4 5 G -1 9 9 2 G -1 988 G-1961 G -2 0 0 1 G -2 0 0 9 G-1985 G - 2 0 0 4 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, increment P Corp., NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 1 0 200 400 600 Feet Figure 5 SANITARY SEWER MODEL RESULTS UPSIZE UNDER CAPACITY LINES City of Edina, MN Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.1, 2014-09-19 19:12 File: I:\Projects\23\27\G13\Maps\SAC Availability\WTP\Option2_LineReplace\EdinaWTP_O2_150.mxd User: mbm 1 inch = 400 feet WTP Discharge Location Municipal Boundary 0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80 80-90 90-100 >100 Pipe Capacity (%) G-1776 G-1772 G-1771 G-1959 G-1964 G-1962 G-1960 G-1949 G-1951 G-2003 G -2 016 G-1290 G-1291 G-1937 G -2 0 2 3 G -2 0 2 6 G -2 0 2 4 G -2 0 2 2 G -1 7 8 4 G -1 7 9 3 G -1 9 3 2 G -1 7 7 3 G -1 7 8 7 G-1782 G -1 9 3 4 G -1 9 6 3 G-1935 G-1786 G -1 7 8 8 G -1 7 8 1 G-1941 G -1 7 9 2 G -1 9 8 6 G -1 7 7 4 G -1 9 3 3 G -1 9 3 1 G-1948 G -1 99 6 G-2021 G -1 7 7 2 G -1 7 8 0 G -2 0 0 0 G-2 020 G -1 9 5 0 G -1 7 8 9 G -1 9 7 3 G -1 9 5 6 G -1 9 9 7 G-1955 G -1 9 6 8 G-1965 G-1938 G-1975 G -1 9 5 7 G -1 9 7 4 G -2 0 0 2 G -1 9 3 6 G-1978 G -1 7 9 0 G - 1 9 8 9 G-1958 G -1 9 9 5 G - 1 9 5 4 G -2 0 2 9 G -1 9 9 8 G -1 7 9 1 G - 1 9 8 2 G -1 9 5 3 G-1771 G-1775 G - 1 7 7 0 G -1 9 6 6 G -1 9 4 7 G -2 0 2 5 G-1940 G -1 9 7 0 G-1785 G-1777 G-1980 G-1783 G -1 9 4 3 G-1969 G -2 0 3 0 G - 1 9 8 3 G-1769 G-1967 G-1939 G -2 0 2 7 G -1 7 7 9 G-1994 G - 2 0 0 7 G -1 9 4 5 G -1 9 9 2 G -1 988 G-1961 G -2 0 0 1 G -2 0 0 9 G-1985 G - 2 0 0 4 Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013 1 0 200 400 600 Feet Figure 6 Sanitary Sewer Televising City of Edina, MN Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.1, 2014-09-19 19:00 File: I:\Projects\23\27\G13\Maps\SAC Availability\WTP\Existing\EdinaWTP_Ex50.mxd User: mbm 1 inch = 400 feet WTP Discharge Location Pipe in Adequate Condition Pipe in Deteriorated Condition Pipe not Televised G-1776 G-1772 G-1771 G-1959 G-1964 G-1962 G-1960 G-1949 G-1951 G-2003 G -2 016 G-1290 G-1291 G-1937 G -2 0 2 3 G -2 0 2 6 G -2 0 2 4 G -2 0 2 2 G -1 7 8 4 G -1 7 9 3 G -1 9 3 2 G -1 7 7 3 G -1 7 8 7 G-1782 G -1 9 3 4 G -1 9 6 3 G-1935 G-1786 G -1 7 8 8 G -1 7 8 1 G-1941 G -1 7 9 2 G -1 9 8 6 G -1 7 7 4 G -1 9 3 3 G -1 9 3 1 G-1948 G -1 99 6 G-2021 G -1 7 7 2 G -1 7 8 0 G -2 0 0 0 G-2 020 G -1 9 5 0 G -1 7 8 9 G -1 9 7 3 G -1 9 5 6 G -1 9 9 7 G-1955 G -1 9 6 8 G-1965 G-1938 G-1975 G -1 9 5 7 G -1 9 7 4 G -2 0 0 2 G -1 9 3 6 G-1978 G -1 7 9 0 G - 1 9 8 9 G-1958 G -1 9 9 5 G - 1 9 5 4 G -2 0 2 9 G -1 9 9 8 G -1 7 9 1 G - 1 9 8 2 G -1 9 5 3 G-1771 G-1775 G - 1 7 7 0 G -1 9 6 6 G -1 9 4 7 G -2 0 2 5 G-1940 G -1 9 7 0 G-1785 G-1777 G-1980 G-1783 G -1 9 4 3 G-1969 G -2 0 3 0 G - 1 9 8 3 G-1769 G-1967 G-1939 G -2 0 2 7 G -1 7 7 9 G-1994 G - 2 0 0 7 G -1 9 4 5 G -1 9 9 2 G -1 988 G-1961 G -2 0 0 1 G -2 0 0 9 G-1985 G - 2 0 0 4 Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, USGS, Intermap, iPC, NRCAN, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri (Thailand), TomTom, 2013 0 200 400 600 Feet Figure 7 Improvement Areas City of Edina, MN Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.1, 2014-09-19 19:00 File: I:\Projects\23\27\G13\Maps\SAC Availability\WTP\Existing\EdinaWTP_Ex50.mxd User: mbm 1 inch = 400 feet WTP Discharge Location PipeID G‐2348 9.2 9.2 G‐2346 9.5 9.5 G‐2345 0.4 0.4 G‐2344 0.4 0.4 G‐2343 0.4 0.4 G‐2342 0.6 0.6 G‐2341 0.4 0.4 G‐2340 0.2 0.2 G‐2339 0.6 0.6 G‐2338 1.4 1.4 G‐2337 1.1 1.1 G‐2336 0.8 0.8 G‐2335 0.4 0.4 G‐2334 0.7 0.7 G‐2333 0.1 0.1 G‐2347 8.5 8.5 G‐1309 7.7 7.7 G‐1308 7.5 7.5 G‐1307 3.5 3.5 G‐1306 3.4 3.4 G‐1305 4.3 4.3 G‐1304 4.0 4.0 G‐1303 5.5 5.5 G‐1302 4.1 4.1 G‐1301 4.4 4.4 G‐1300 3.7 3.7 G‐1299 2.1 2.1 G‐1298 3.1 3.1 G‐1297 2.7 2.7 G‐1296 2.0 2.0 G‐1295 1.8 1.8 G‐1294 1.3 1.3 G‐1293 0.9 0.9 G‐1292 0.3 0.3 G‐1291 130.3 33.9 G‐1288 53.7 54.5 G‐1287 8.1 8.1 G‐1286 9.7 9.7 G‐1285 29.2 29.2 G‐2030 12.3 12.3 G‐2029 3.4 3.4 G‐2028 10.8 10.8 G‐2027 10.8 10.8 G‐2026 15.5 15.5 G‐2024 0.5 0.5 Pecent Capacity (%) Modeled Flow & Infiltration PipeID Pecent Capacity (%) Modeled Flow & Infiltration G‐2023 0.5 0.5 G‐2022 0.4 0.4 G‐2025 13.8 13.8 G‐2021 9.6 9.6 G‐2016 0.3 0.3 G‐2020 11.9 11.9 G‐2014 7.6 7.6 G‐2015 7.6 7.6 G‐2010 0.4 0.4 G‐2009 0.9 0.9 G‐2008 0.7 0.7 G‐2007 0.6 0.6 G‐2006 0.2 0.2 G‐2005 0.2 0.2 G‐2004 0.1 0.1 G‐2003 0.1 0.1 G‐2013 6.4 6.4 G‐2002 8.9 8.9 G‐2001 6.8 6.8 G‐1999 0.3 0.3 G‐1998 0.7 0.7 G‐1997 0.5 0.5 G‐1996 0.6 0.6 G‐1995 0.2 0.2 G‐1994 0.6 0.6 G‐1993 0.4 0.4 G‐1992 0.3 0.3 G‐1991 0.1 0.1 G‐2000 5.1 5.1 G‐1990 3.7 3.7 G‐1989 1.0 1.0 G‐1988 1.4 1.4 G‐1987 0.5 0.5 G‐1986 0.1 0.1 G‐1984 0.1 0.1 G‐1985 0.4 0.4 G‐1983 0.3 0.3 G‐1982 0.4 0.4 G‐1981 0.3 0.3 G‐1980 0.6 0.6 G‐1979 0.7 0.7 G‐1978 0.1 0.1 G‐1976 1.4 1.4 G‐1975 1.5 1.5 G‐1974 0.2 0.2 PipeID Pecent Capacity (%) Modeled Flow & Infiltration G‐1973 0.4 0.4 G‐1970 49.5 52.1 G‐1969 43.7 46.1 G‐1967 0.1 0.1 G‐1966 0.5 0.5 G‐1965 0.5 0.5 G‐1964 0.5 0.5 G‐1963 0.8 0.8 G‐1962 0.4 0.4 G‐1961 0.1 0.1 G‐1960 0.7 0.7 G‐1959 25.3 26.7 G‐1977 46.1 48.6 G‐1958 18.0 19.0 G‐1957 0.2 0.2 G‐1956 0.1 0.1 G‐1955 0.4 0.4 G‐1954 0.4 0.4 G‐1953 0.2 0.2 G‐1952 0.1 0.1 G‐1290 129.2 33.6 G‐1951 117.5 30.5 G‐1950 112.8 29.3 G‐1949 132.0 34.3 G‐1948 50.4 34.0 G‐1947 7.4 7.4 G‐1946 7.4 7.4 G‐1945 1.3 1.3 G‐1944 1.1 1.1 G‐1943 1.4 1.4 G‐1942 3.5 3.5 G‐1941 1.9 1.9 G‐1940 0.5 0.5 G‐1939 0.6 0.6 G‐1938 1.7 1.7 G‐1937 0.5 0.5 G‐1936 0.3 0.3 G‐1935 1.1 1.1 G‐1934 0.8 0.8 G‐1933 0.3 0.3 G‐1931 0.3 0.3 G‐1932 0.1 0.1 G‐1793 0.4 0.4 G‐1792 0.3 0.3 G‐1790 0.3 0.3 PipeID Pecent Capacity (%) Modeled Flow & Infiltration G‐1789 0.1 0.1 G‐1791 0.1 0.1 G‐1788 0.4 0.4 G‐1787 0.1 0.1 G‐1786 2.1 2.1 G‐1785 0.8 0.8 G‐1784 31.2 32.9 G‐1783 43.3 45.7 G‐1782 40.5 42.8 G‐1781 0.2 0.2 G‐1780 0.2 0.2 G‐1779 0.2 0.2 G‐1778 0.2 0.2 G‐1968 43.6 45.9 G‐1777 43.4 45.8 G‐1776 38.9 41.0 G‐1775 43.3 45.6 G‐1774 39.0 41.1 G‐1773 38.9 41.0 G‐1772 53.2 56.1 G‐1771 0.5 0.5 G‐1770 0.3 0.3 G‐1769 0.4 0.4 G‐1768 0.8 0.8 G‐1767 0.3 0.3 G‐1766 0.3 0.3 G‐1764 0.5 0.5 G‐1763 0.5 0.5 G‐1762 0.2 0.2 G‐1761 0.1 0.1 G‐1760 0.8 0.8 G‐1759 0.2 0.2 G‐1765 4.2 4.2 G‐1758 0.9 0.9 G‐1757 7.3 7.3 G‐1756 0.1 0.1 G‐1755 0.2 0.2 G‐1754 0.1 0.1 G‐1753 0.6 0.6 G‐1752 0.3 0.3 G‐1751 0.6 0.6 G‐1750 0.3 0.3 G‐1749 2.6 2.6 G‐1748 1.0 1.0 G‐1747 1.2 1.2 PipeID Pecent Capacity (%) Modeled Flow & Infiltration G‐1746 0.3 0.3 G‐1745 19.4 19.4 G‐1744 15.2 15.2 G‐1743 14.9 14.9 G‐1742 14.3 14.3 G‐1741 14.4 14.4 G‐1740 11.2 11.2 G‐1739 9.8 9.8 G‐1736 5.4 5.4 G‐1735 0.4 0.4 G‐1734 0.3 0.3 G‐1733 0.8 0.8 G‐1732 0.3 0.3 G‐1737 9.7 9.7 G‐1731 2.9 2.9 G‐1730 2.6 2.6 G‐1729 1.5 1.5 G‐1728 1.1 1.1 G‐1727 1.0 1.0 G‐1726 0.3 0.3 Ta b l e 2 . C o n c e p t u a l L e v e l C o s t E s t i m a t e s WT P # 4 S e w e r A n a l y s i s - C i t y o f E d i n a , M N Op t i o n # E s t i m a t e d C o s t 1A 7 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1B 9 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2A 4 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2B 4 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3A 6 9 0 , 0 0 0 $ No t e s : * C o n c e p t u a l l e v e l c o s t e s t i m a t e s - + 1 0 0 / - 5 0 % * A s s u m i n g g o o d s o i l c o n d i t i o n s * N e c e s s a r y e a s e m e n t s a n d a c c e s s a g r e e m e n t s a c q u i r e d b y C i t y o f E d i n a * I n c l u d e s 2 5 % c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t i n g e n c y a n d 2 0 % f o r e n g i n e e r i n g a n d a d m i n i s t r a t i o n * O p t i o n 1 A - R e p l a c e m e n t / r e l o c a t i o n o f s e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 2 5 t o 1 3 1 5 * O p t i o n 1 B - R l i n i n g o f s e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 2 5 t o 1 3 1 5 a n d n e w f o r c e m a i n * O p t i o n 2 A - R e p l a c e m e n t o f s e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 1 9 t o 1 3 7 6 * O p t i o n 2 B - L i n i n g o f s e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 1 9 t o 1 3 7 6 * O p t i o n 3 A - R e p l a c e m e n t o f s e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 6 4 t o 1 7 5 9 P: \ M p l s \ 2 3 M N \ 2 7 \ 2 3 2 7 G 1 3 \ W o r k F i l e s \ S A C A v a i l a b i l i t y \ S A C a v a i l a b i l i t y D a t a \ W T P A n a l y s i s \ 0 9 2 5 1 4 W T P U p d a t e \ U p d a t e d \ C o s t E s t i m a t e s .x l s Attachment No. 1 Sewer Televising (electronic) Attachment No. WTP #4 Plans Attachment No. 3 Conceptual Cost Estimates WT P # 4 A n a l y s i s Ba r r P r o j e c t # 2 3 / 2 7 - 1 3 3 1 Fe a s i b i l i t y L e v e l C o s t E s t i m a t e 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 Ar e a 1 O p t i o n A - R e b u i l d S a n i t a r y S e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 2 5 t o 1 3 1 5 It e m Q u a n t i t y U n i t s U n i t C o s t E x t e n s i o n N o t e s Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n Mo b i l i z a t i o n 1 L S 4 3 , 0 0 0 $ 4 3 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 % o f w o r k i t e m s Se w e r B y - p a s s 2 8 D a y s 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ A s s u m e s 2 4 h r s o f a t t e n d p u m p i n g De m o l i t i o n Re m o v e B i t u m i n o u s P a v e m e n t a n d C u r b 6 5 0 S Y 6 $ 3 , 6 7 3 $ S a w c u t , r e m o v e b i t u m i n o u s , a n d d i s p o s e Ab a n d o n E x i s t i n g P i p e a n d M a n h o l e s 1 1 7 0 L F 1 0 $ 1 1 , 7 0 0 $ F i l l e x i s t i n g p i p e s a n d m a n h o l e s w i t h f l o w a b l e f i l l Ut i l i t y W o r k 10 " P V C G r a v i t y S e w e r 1 1 7 0 L F 7 5 $ 8 7 , 7 5 0 $ F & I p i p e , a s s u m e 8 - 1 0 ' d e e p , b a c k f i l l a n d c o m p a c t i o n 48 " S t a n d a r d M a n h o l e 6 E A 1 2 , 0 0 0 $ 7 2 , 0 0 0 $ F & I M a n h o l e a n d p i p e c o n n e c t i o n s Re s o l v e U t i l i t y C o n f l i c t s 1 L S 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Se r v i c e C o n n e c t i o n s 6 E a 5 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Re s t o r a t i o n Cu r b a n d G u t t e r 5 0 0 L F 2 9 $ 1 4 , 6 9 0 $ S t a n d a r d c u r b a n d g u t t e r Si t e R e s t o r a t i o n , S e e d a n d M u l c h 5 0 S Y 2 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Bi t u m i n o u s P a v e m e n t 6 5 0 S Y 9 0 $ 5 8 , 5 0 0 $ B a s e c o u r s e , b i t u m i n o u s s u r f a c e , c l a s s 5 Co n s t r u c t i o n S u b t o t a l 4 7 7 , 3 1 3 $ Co n s t r u c t i o n C o n t i n g e n c y 25 % 1 1 9 , 3 2 8 $ 2 5 % o f c o n s t . s u b t o t a l To t a l E s t i m a t e d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t 5 9 7 , 0 0 0 $ En g i n e e r i n g a n d A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 2 0 % 1 1 9 , 4 0 0 $ 2 0 % o f e s t i m a t e c a p i t a l c o s t Ca p i t a l T o t a l 7 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ Qu a l i f i c a t i o n s : Fe a s i l b i l i t y l e v e l e s t i m a t e , p l u s 1 0 0 % / m i n u s 5 0 % As s u m i n g g o o d s o i l c o n d i t i o n s Ne c e s s a r y e a s e m e n t s a c q u i r e d b y C i t y o f E d i n a P: \ M p l s \ 2 3 M N \ 2 7 \ 2 3 2 7 G 1 3 \ W o r k F i l e s \ S A C A v a i l a b i l i t y \ S A C a v a i l a b i l i t y D a t a \ W T P A n a l y s i s \ 0 9 2 5 1 4 W T P U p d a t e \ U p d a t e d \ C o s t E s t i m a t e s .x l s WT P # 4 A n a l y s i s Ba r r P r o j e c t # 2 3 / 2 7 - 1 3 3 1 Fe a s i b i l i t y L e v e l C o s t E s t i m a t e 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 Ar e a 1 O p t i o n B - L i n e E x i s t i n g S e w e r a n d i n s t a l l n e w f o r c e m a i n It e m Q u a n t i t y U n i t s U n i t C o s t E x t e n s i o n N o t e s Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n Mo b i l i z a t i o n 1 L S 4 9 , 0 0 0 $ 4 9 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 % o f w o r k i t e m s Se w e r B y - p a s s 1 4 D a y s 5 , 0 0 0 $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 $ A s s u m e s 8 h r s o f a t t e n d p u m p i n g Ut i l i t y W o r k Li n e 9 - i n c h V C P ( C I P P ) 1 8 3 0 L F 2 2 0 $ 4 0 2 , 6 0 0 $ F & I C I P P l i n e r 4" H D P E F o r c e m a i n ( d i r e c t i o n a l d r i l l ) 7 5 0 L F 1 1 0 $ 8 2 , 5 0 0 $ F & I p i p e a n d i n s t a l l b y t r e n c h l e s s m e t h o d s Re s o l v e U t i l i t y C o n f l i c t s 1 L S 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Re s t o r a t i o n Si t e R e s t o r a t i o n , S e e d a n d M u l c h 1 0 0 S Y 2 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Co n s t r u c t i o n S u b t o t a l 6 1 1 , 1 0 0 $ Co n s t r u c t i o n C o n t i n g e n c y 25 % 1 5 2 , 7 7 5 $ 2 5 % o f c o n s t . s u b t o t a l To t a l E s t i m a t e d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t 7 6 4 , 0 0 0 $ En g i n e e r i n g a n d A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 2 0 % 1 5 2 , 8 0 0 $ 2 0 % o f e s t i m a t e c a p i t a l c o s t Ca p i t a l T o t a l 9 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ Qu a l i f i c a t i o n s : Fe a s i l b i l i t y l e v e l e s t i m a t e , p l u s 1 0 0 % / m i n u s 5 0 % As s u m i n g g o o d s o i l c o n d i t i o n s Ne c e s s a r y e a s e m e n t s a c q u i r e d b y C i t y o f E d i n a P: \ M p l s \ 2 3 M N \ 2 7 \ 2 3 2 7 G 1 3 \ W o r k F i l e s \ S A C A v a i l a b i l i t y \ S A C a v a i l a b i l i t y D a t a \ W T P A n a l y s i s \ 0 9 2 5 1 4 W T P U p d a t e \ U p d a t e d \ C o s t E s t i m a t e s .x l s WT P # 4 A n a l y s i s Ba r r P r o j e c t # 2 3 / 2 7 - 1 3 3 1 Fe a s i b i l i t y L e v e l C o s t E s t i m a t e 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 Ar e a 2 O p t i o n A - R e b u i l d S a n i t a r y S e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 1 9 t o 1 3 7 6 It e m Q u a n t i t y U n i t s U n i t C o s t E x t e n s i o n N o t e s Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n Mo b i l i z a t i o n 1 L S 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 % o f w o r k i t e m s Se w e r B y - p a s s 2 1 D a y s 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 $ A s s u m e s 8 h r s o f a t t e n d p u m p i n g De m o l i t i o n Ab a n d o n E x i s t i n g P i p e a n d M a n h o l e s 7 8 0 L F 1 0 $ 7 , 8 0 0 $ F i l l e x i s t i n g p i p e s a n d m a n h o l e s w i t h f l o w a b l e f i l l Ut i l i t y W o r k 10 " P V C G r a v i t y S e w e r 7 8 0 L F 7 5 $ 5 8 , 5 0 0 $ F & I p i p e , a s s u m e 8 - 1 0 ' d e e p , b a c k f i l l a n d c o m p a c t i o n 48 " S t a n d a r d M a n h o l e 5 E A 1 2 , 0 0 0 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 $ F & I M a n h o l e a n d p i p e c o n n e c t i o n s Re s o l v e U t i l i t y C o n f l i c t s 2 L S 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Se r v i c e C o n n e c t i o n s 1 E a 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Re s t o r a t i o n Si t e R e s t o r a t i o n , S e e d a n d M u l c h 4 3 3 S Y 2 0 $ 8 , 6 6 7 $ A l l o w a n c e Co n s t r u c t i o n S u b t o t a l 2 6 9 , 9 6 7 $ Co n s t r u c t i o n C o n t i n g e n c y 25 % 6 7 , 4 9 2 $ 2 5 % o f c o n s t . s u b t o t a l To t a l E s t i m a t e d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t 3 3 7 , 0 0 0 $ En g i n e e r i n g a n d A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 2 0 % 7 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 % o f e s t i m a t e c a p i t a l c o s t Ca p i t a l T o t a l 4 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ Qu a l i f i c a t i o n s : Fe a s i l b i l i t y l e v e l e s t i m a t e , p l u s 1 0 0 % / m i n u s 5 0 % As s u m i n g g o o d s o i l c o n d i t i o n s Ne c e s s a r y e a s e m e n t s a c q u i r e d b y C i t y o f E d i n a P: \ M p l s \ 2 3 M N \ 2 7 \ 2 3 2 7 G 1 3 \ W o r k F i l e s \ S A C A v a i l a b i l i t y \ S A C a v a i l a b i l i t y D a t a \ W T P A n a l y s i s \ 0 9 2 5 1 4 W T P U p d a t e \ U p d a t e d \ C o s t E s t i m a t e s .x l s WT P # 4 A n a l y s i s Ba r r P r o j e c t # 2 3 / 2 7 - 1 3 3 1 Fe a s i b i l i t y L e v e l C o s t E s t i m a t e 11 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 Ar e a 2 O p t i o n B - L i n e E x i s t i n g S e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 1 9 t o 1 3 7 6 It e m Q u a n t i t y U n i t s U n i t C o s t E x t e n s i o n N o t e s Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n Mo b i l i z a t i o n 1 L S 1 7 , 0 0 0 $ 1 7 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 % o f w o r k i t e m s Se w e r B y - p a s s 2 1 D a y s 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 $ A s s u m e s 8 h r s o f a t t e n d p u m p i n g Ut i l i t y W o r k Li n e 9 - i n c h V C P ( C I P P ) 7 8 0 L F 2 1 0 $ 1 6 3 , 8 0 0 $ F & I C I P P l i n e r Re s o l v e U t i l i t y C o n f l i c t s 1 L S 5 , 0 0 0 $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Re s t o r a t i o n Si t e R e s t o r a t i o n , S e e d a n d M u l c h 1 0 0 S Y 2 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Co n s t r u c t i o n S u b t o t a l 2 9 2 , 8 0 0 $ Co n s t r u c t i o n C o n t i n g e n c y 25 % 7 3 , 2 0 0 $ 2 5 % o f c o n s t . s u b t o t a l To t a l E s t i m a t e d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t 3 6 6 , 0 0 0 $ En g i n e e r i n g a n d A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 2 0 % 7 3 , 2 0 0 $ 2 0 % o f e s t i m a t e c a p i t a l c o s t Ca p i t a l T o t a l 4 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ Qu a l i f i c a t i o n s : Fe a s i l b i l i t y l e v e l e s t i m a t e , p l u s 1 0 0 % / m i n u s 5 0 % As s u m i n g g o o d s o i l c o n d i t i o n s Ne c e s s a r y e a s e m e n t s a c q u i r e d b y C i t y o f E d i n a P: \ M p l s \ 2 3 M N \ 2 7 \ 2 3 2 7 G 1 3 \ W o r k F i l e s \ S A C A v a i l a b i l i t y \ S A C a v a i l a b i l i t y D a t a \ W T P A n a l y s i s \ 0 9 2 5 1 4 W T P U p d a t e \ U p d a t e d \ C o s t E s t i m a t e s .x l s WT P # 4 A n a l y s i s Ba r r P r o j e c t # 2 3 / 2 7 - 1 3 3 1 Fe a s i b i l i t y L e v e l C o s t E s t i m a t e 11/15/2014 Ar e a 3 O p t i o n A - R e b u i l d S a n i t a r y S e w e r f r o m M H 1 3 6 4 t o 1 7 5 9 It e m Q u a n t i t y U n i t s U n i t C o s t E x t e n s i o n N o t e s Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n Mo b i l i z a t i o n 1 L S 4 2 , 0 0 0 $ 4 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 % o f w o r k i t e m s Se w e r B y - p a s s 2 8 D a y s 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 $ A s s u m e s 8 h r s o f a t t e n d p u m p i n g De m o l i t i o n Re m o v e B i t u m i n o u s P a v e m e n t a n d C u r b 7 S Y 6 $ 4 2 $ S a w c u t , r e m o v e b i t u m i n o u s , a n d d i s p o s e Ab a n d o n E x i s t i n g P i p e a n d M a n h o l e s 1 3 0 0 L F 1 0 $ 1 3 , 0 0 0 $ R e m o v e e x i s t i n g p i p e s a n d m a n h o l e s Ut i l i t y W o r k 10 " P V C G r a v i t y S e w e r 1 3 0 0 L F 7 5 $ 9 7 , 5 0 0 $ F & I p i p e , a s s u m e 8 - 1 0 ' d e e p , b a c k f i l l a n d c o m p a c t i o n 48 " S t a n d a r d M a n h o l e 9 E A 1 2 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 8 , 0 0 0 $ F & I M a n h o l e a n d p i p e c o n n e c t i o n s Re s o l v e U t i l i t y C o n f l i c t s 4 L S 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Se r v i c e C o n n e c t i o n s 4 E a 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ A l l o w a n c e Re s t o r a t i o n Cu r b a n d G u t t e r 2 0 0 L F 2 9 $ 5 , 8 7 6 $ b a s e c o u r s e , B 6 1 2 c u r b Si t e R e s t o r a t i o n , S e e d a n d M u l c h 7 2 2 S Y 2 0 $ 1 4 , 4 4 4 $ Bi t u m i n o u s P a v e m e n t 1 0 S Y 9 0 $ 9 0 0 $ b a s e c o u r s e , b i t u m i n o u s s u r f a c e Co n s t r u c t i o n S u b t o t a l 4 6 1 , 7 6 2 $ Co n s t r u c t i o n C o n t i n g e n c y 25 % 1 1 5 , 4 4 1 $ 2 5 % o f c o n s t . s u b t o t a l To t a l E s t i m a t e d C o n s t r u c t i o n C o s t 5 7 7 , 0 0 0 $ En g i n e e r i n g a n d A d m i n i s t r a t i o n 2 0 % 1 1 5 , 4 0 0 $ 2 0 % o f e s t i m a t e c a p i t a l c o s t Ca p i t a l T o t a l 6 9 0 , 0 0 0 $ Qu a l i f i c a t i o n s : Fe a s i l b i l i t y l e v e l e s t i m a t e , p l u s 1 0 0 % / m i n u s 5 0 % As s u m i n g g o o d s o i l c o n d i t i o n s Ne c e s s a r y e a s e m e n t s a c q u i r e d b y C i t y o f E d i n a P: \ M p l s \ 2 3 M N \ 2 7 \ 2 3 2 7 G 1 3 \ W o r k F i l e s \ S A C A v a i l a b i l i t y \ S A C a v a i l a b i l i t y D a t a \ W T P A n a l y s i s \ 0 9 2 5 1 4 W T P U p d a t e \ U p d a t e d \ C o s t E s t i m a t e s .x l s Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Chad A. Millner, PE Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Change Order: Contract ENG 16-5 Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Contract Change Orders #1 and #2 in the amount of $122,463.00. INTRODUCTION: Please see detailed report attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase / Change Order Change Orders #1 and #2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 November 15, 2016 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ☒ ☐ Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Change Order - Contract ENG 16-5 Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction N/A N/A Palda & Sons, Inc. $122,463.30 Recommended Quote or Bid: Palda & Sons, Inc. $122,463.30 Information/Background: The project involves the reconstruction of Tracy Avenue from the north side of the TH 62 north ramp to Benton Avenue. The contract was awarded on April 5, 2016 in the amount of $1,562,004.38. This project is listed in the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP #15-125 for $2,270,000. It was mentioned in the Request for Purchase that final project costs are subject to change based on construction related items such as soil corrections. Changed conditions were found. The table below summaries each change order. Attached is documentation for change orders #1 and #2 with reference to a future #3. Change Order # Description Justification Estimated Additional Costs Funding Source 1 Sanitary Sewer Structures Reconstruction Missing bid item to reconstruct the top 4-10-ft of the sanitary sewer structures to make them water tight $28,383.30 Sanitary Sewer Fund 2 Trench Replacement Backfill Encountered soils not structurally suitable for street reconstruction $94,080.00 Combination of utility and street funds 3 (Pending) Contaminated Soils Excavated soils were flagged for Diesel Range Organics (DRO) at the Lake Marion site in Lakeville Up to $250,000 Combination of funding sources REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Change Order #3: Contaminated Soils. Soils that are not suitable for structural support of utility trenches and/or the street are removed from the project site and taken to sites near the metro area to be used as clean fill for future development. Soils brought in to these sites are required to be environmentally tested. Our soils were taken to the Lake Marion site in Lakeville, owned by Midwest Asphalt, Inc. Some of the soils from our project tested above the Diesel Range Organics (DRO) limits set by both the MPCA and Dakota County. There is approximately 11,000 tons of material at this site from Tracy Avenue. If all of it has to be removed, it could cost up to $250,000. Instead of a wholesale removal operation, we are currently working with American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AET) and Dakota County to develop a testing plan to reduce how much soil needs to be removed. If we can find the specific locations of the contaminated soils within the Lake Marion site, we only have to remove those specific soils. This would greatly reduce the cost. Potholing and testing of the soil at the Lake Marion site will happen during the week of Nov. 7. Removal operations are tentatively scheduled for the week of Nov. 14. Once the extents of the operations are known, I will provide those details to the council. Change Order #3 is a placeholder for follow up later on. Staff recommends approval of contract change orders #1 and #2 in the amount of $122,463.30. G:\ENG\CONST\CONTRACTS\2016\ENG 16-5 Tracy Ave\BA399\ADMIN\MISC\Contract Change Order Nov 15_Tracy.docx Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2016-117 Final Plat & Development Contract: 7700 France Avenue for Frauenshuh Companies Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2016-117 approving the final plat and development contract. INTRODUCTION: The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. The city attorney has drafted the development contract, and the applicant is agreeable to the terms. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2016-117 Development Contract Final Plat Revised Landscape Plan 189998v2 1 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FRAUENSHUH FRANCE AVENUE PLAT CONTRACT dated November 15, 2016, by and among the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”), and DRF EDINA MEDICAL BUILDING LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for Frauenshuh France Avenue Plat (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, EDINA OFFICE CENTER, except that part thereof lying Southerly and Westerly of the Westerly right-of-way of West 77th Street as described in Document No. 1321642, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with the benefits of the easements set forth in Document No. 1321643. Property is Torrens Certificate No. 1048502 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 100 days after the City Council approves the final plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or 189998v2 2 private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the required insurance for the Developer has been received by the City, and 4) the plat is filed with the office of the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. The only exception is that grading for the parking ramp and storm water retention may proceed before the plat is filed with the office of the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Titles. 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For five (5) years from the date of this Contract no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plans A and D, Plans B, C, E and F may be prepared, subject to the City Engineer’s approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Plat Plan B - Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Plan C - Tree Preservation Plan Plan D - Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements Plan E - Landscape Plan Plan F - Shared parking and access agreements 6. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System 189998v2 3 B. Water System C. Storm Sewer System D. Streets E. Site Grading, Stormwater Treatment/Infiltration Basins, and Erosion Control F. Underground Utilities G. Setting of Iron Monuments H. Surveying and Staking I. Sidewalks and Trails J. Retaining Walls The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utility and street construction; and City ordinances. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment is prohibited between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all reasonable instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as 189998v2 4 constructed" plans and an electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in an AutoCAD.DWG file or a .DXF file, all prepared in accordance with City standards. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed following site grading, utility and street construction. 7. CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 6 above. 8. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, which may include: A. Hennepin County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights-of-Way B. Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains C. MPCA NPDES Permit for Construction Activity D. MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal E. DNR for Dewatering F. City of Edina for Building Permits and Retaining Walls G. MCES for Sanitary Sewer Connections H. Nine Mile Creek Watershed 9. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer’s and the Developer’s contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 10. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by November 30, 2017. 189998v2 5 11. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 12. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional reasonable erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be stabilized per the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification which may include temporary seed to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such reasonable action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 13. GRADING. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading development and erosion control plan, Plan "B". The plan shall conform to City of Edina specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits, the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all storm water treatment/infiltration basins and swales, have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of storm water treatment/infiltration basins; and b) location and elevations along all swales, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed 189998v2 6 "conservation area" posts. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as reasonably determined by the City Engineer. The soils observation and testing report, including referenced development phases and lot descriptions, shall be submitted to the Building Official for review prior to the issuance of building permits. A certified as-built building pad survey must be submitted and approved for commercial, industrial or institutional developments prior to issuance of a building permit. 14. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, builders, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the plat, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 15. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract and final acceptance by the City, the improvements sanitary sewer, watermain and sidewalk labeled public on the plans and lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 16. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay a fee for in-house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be three percent (3%) of construction costs identified in the Summary of Security Requirements if using a letter of credit, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's in-house engineering staff or consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and street construction and will be billed on hourly rates estimated to be: $50 (staff); $110 (consultant). 189998v2 7 17. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress for grading, public utility construction, and public street construction is restricted to access the subdivision via Minnesota Drive and 77th Street. No construction traffic is permitted on the adjacent local streets. 18. PARK DEDICATION. The developer shall convey to the city a 10-14 foot wide sidewalk easement along the north boundary line of the plat from 77th Street to France Avenue. The developer shall construct this east-west sidewalk along the north line within the easement area. The Developer shall also grant sidewalk easement along 77th Street and Minnesota. The Developer shall construct a boulevard style sidewalk in this easement. Final easement areas and construction plans for the sidewalks are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. Conveyance to the City of the easements and construction of the sidewalks are deemed to satisfy the City’s Park Dedication requirement. 19. LANDSCAPING. The developer will install landscaping improvements in accordance with the approved plans referenced in Section 5 of this Contract. A cash escrow of $10,000 shall be furnished the City to guarantee compliance with the landscaping and tree preservation requirements. If the landscaping is not completed in a timely manner, the City may perform the work, and apply the cash escrow toward the cost. Upon satisfactory completion of the landscaping the escrow funds, without interest, less any draw made by the City, shall be returned to the person who deposited the funds with the City. All trees shall be warranted to be alive, of good quality, and disease free for twelve (12) months after planting. Any replacements shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or property owner is responsible for contacting the City when all the landscaping has been installed to set up an inspection. Fifty percent (50%) of the security will be released when all the landscaping has been installed and inspected by City staff and the remaining fifty percent (50%) will be released one year after the landscaping inspection and any warranty work has been completed. 20. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the October 6, 2016, engineering report. B. Compliance with City Council Resolution No. 2016-112 189998v2 8 C. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be either AutoCAD.DWG file or a .DXF file. All construction record drawings (e.g., grading, utilities, streets) shall be in electronic format in accordance with standard City specifications. 21. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $263,000. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: A. Sanitary Sewer $ 25,000 B. Watermain (Partial pile and truss) $ 88,000 C. Sidewalk $150,000 TOTAL SECURITY: $263,000 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City. The City may draw down the security, on five (5) business days’ written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down without notice. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City,and a warranty security is provided. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 189998v2 9 22. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City prior to the City Council signing the final plat: A. Landscaping and Tree Preservation $10,000 B. City Construction Observation $ 7,890 (3% public) TOTAL CASH REQUIREMENTS $17,890 23. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for streets is one year. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Council. The one-year warranty period on streets shall commence after the final wear course has been installed and accepted by the City Council. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of streets and utilities. 24. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it and the reasonable costs incurred by the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District charges and reasonable legal, planning, engineering and construction observation inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. 189998v2 10 B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development, except to the extent caused by the willful misconduct of the City or its employees, agents, and consultants. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for reasonable costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. E. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 25. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder that (except in an emergency as reasonably determined by the City) remains uncured after ten (10) days written notice by the City (or such longer period if the default cannot reasonably be cured within such 10-day period and Developer has commenced to cure the default within such 10-day period and thereafter diligently pursues the cure to completion), the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, reasonable expense incurred by the City. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be 189998v2 11 necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the reasonable cost in whole or in part. 26. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connections or inspections may be conducted and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. 189998v2 12 The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the property being final platted or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. H. The Developer and contractor shall acquire public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The insurance must be maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractor shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be 189998v2 13 exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. K. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the Building Official evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans and by special conditions referred to in this Contract shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall is required to be built. 27. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: c/o Frauenshuh, Inc., 7101 West 78th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55439. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City of Edina, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City of Edina, Attn: Scott Neal, City Manager at the following address: City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St, Edina, MN 55424. 28. OWNER CONSENT. The City and the Developer acknowledge and agree that the Owner has joined in this Contract for the sole purpose of consenting to the provisions hereof, provided that notwithstanding such provisions bind the subject property owned by Owner, in all instances the Developer shall be solely responsible for, and the City shall look solely to the Developer to, perform all covenants, conditions, and obligations under this Contract. Owner hereby consents to and grants Developer a license to enter upon the Owner’s property for the purpose of performing under this 189998v2 14 Contract, subject to reasonable terms and conditions consistent with the Developer’s obligations to be set forth in a separate, written agreement. CITY OF EDINA BY: ___________________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor AND __________________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2016, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 189998v2 15 DEVELOPER: DRF EDINA MEDICAL BUILDING LLC By:______________________________________ David R. Frauenshuh, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _____________, 2016, by David R. Frauenshuh, the Manager of DRF Edina Medical Building LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 RNK 189998v2 16 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT 7700 France Avenue LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2016. 7700 France Avenue LLC By:______________________________________ David R. Frauenshuh, Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of _____________, 2016, by David R. Frauenshuh, the Manager of 7700 France Avenue LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 RNK 189998v2 17 MORTGAGE CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Genworth Life Insurance Company, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2_____. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF __________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________, 2_____, by __________________________________________________________________________. ________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 RNK 189998v2 18 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina City Manager 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2_____. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the ____________ that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: ____________, ____________ City Hall, __________________________, and is actually received by the ___________ at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its _________________ 3 0 ' 6 0 ' 1 5 ' 7 . 5 ' 0 ' 1 " = 3 0 ' S C A L E : 01 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN P R O J E C T N O : 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2016 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC C D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : SRa SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. D A T E : E N T M 1 6 - 0 4 2 . 1 1 1 / 0 2 / 1 6 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 11/2/2016 CD PKG #1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 530 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 PH: 612.333.3702 WWW.THINKCONFLUENCE.COM 7700 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH CD PACKAGE #1 7700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Terry Minarik 11/02/201642242 TREE PRESERVATION LEGEND:PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED (49)TREE PRESERVATION NOTES:ALL OF THE PROTECTED TREE REMOVALS ON SITE FALL UNDER SECTION10-82. PRESERVATION, PROTECTION AND REPLACEMENT OF PROTECTEDTREES AND WILL NOT REQUIRE MITIGATION:(5) PROTECTED TREES MAY BE REMOVED WITHOUT MITIGATION, IN THE FOLLOWINGAREAS:1. INCLUDING, AND WITHIN A TEN-FOOT RADIUS OF, THE BUILDING PAD, DECK ORPATIO OF A NEW OR REMODELED BUILDING.2. INCLUDING, AND WITHIN A FIVE-FOOT RADIUS OF DRIVEWAYS AND PARKINGAREAS.3. INCLUDING, AND WITHIN TEN-FOOT RADIUS OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLICINFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING PUBLIC ROADWAYS,STORMWATER RETENTION AREAS AND UTILITIES. T R E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N L 0 . 1 PROTECTED TREES - PRESERVED (14) 1 G T 1 0 D L 5 C O 1 G T 1 0 D L 1 G T 1 0 D L PROOF OF PARKING15 STALLS PROOF OF PARKING12 STALLS 3 0 ' 6 0 ' 1 5 ' 7 . 5 ' 0 ' 1 " = 3 0 ' S C A L E : 01 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN P R O J E C T N O : 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2016 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC C D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : SRa SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. D A T E : E N T M 1 6 - 0 4 2 . 1 1 1 / 0 2 / 1 6 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 11/2/2016 CD PKG #1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 530 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 PH: 612.333.3702 WWW.THINKCONFLUENCE.COM 7700 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH CD PACKAGE #1 7700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Terry Minarik 11/02/201642242 T R E E P R E S E R V A T I O N P L A N L 0 . 2 T R E E P R E S E R V A T I O N L E G E N D : P R O T E C T E D T R E E S T O B E R E M O V E D ( 4 9 ) T R E E P R E S E R V A T I O N N O T E S : A L L O F T H E P R O T E C T E D T R E E R E M O V A L S O N S I T E F A L L U N D E R S E C T I O N 1 0 - 8 2 . P R E S E R V A T I O N , P R O T E C T I O N A N D R E P L A C E M E N T O F P R O T E C T E D T R E E S , A N D W I L L N O T R E Q U I R E M I T I G A T I O N : ( 5 ) P R O T E C T E D T R E E S M A Y B E R E M O V E D W I T H O U T M I T I G A T I O N , I N T H E F O L L O W I N G A R E A S : 1 . I N C L U D I N G , A N D W I T H I N A T E N - F O O T R A D I U S O F , T H E B U I L D I N G P A D , D E C K O R P A T I O O F A N E W O R R E M O D E L E D B U I L D I N G . 2 . I N C L U D I N G , A N D W I T H I N A F I V E - F O O T R A D I U S O F D R I V E W A Y S A N D P A R K I N G A R E A S . 3 . I N C L U D I N G , A N D W I T H I N T E N - F O O T R A D I U S O F I N S T A L L A T I O N O F P U B L I C I N F R A S T R U C T U R E I M P R O V E M E N T S I N C L U D I N G P U B L I C R O A D W A Y S , S T O R M W A T E R R E T E N T I O N A R E A S A N D U T I L I T I E S . P R O T E C T E D T R E E S - P R E S E R V E D ( 1 4 ) 2 B N 3 7 R A 5 B N 5 4 R A 2 2 T C 2 0 C A 1 8 A S 2 3 C A 1 0 T C 1 2 7 S O 3 C I 3 A F 4 T A 3 A B 3 C O 3 A B 3QB 2 G T 2 A F 2 A F 2 A F 2 A F 1 P G 1 2 G T 2 G T 2 G T 2AF2AF1AF 2 0 D L 2 0 D L 2 0 D L 2 0 D L 2 0 D L 2 0 D L 3 1 D L 3 1 D L 2 G T 2 G T 6 3 D C 7 6 D C 10RA 6RA 7RA 3RA 9RA 3RA 1 P G 2 2 3 D L 2 2 D L 1 P G 1 2 4 D L 2 P G 2 5 B N 1 P G 1 2 P G 1 1 P G 2 1 3 D L 6 C I 7 2 D C 7 2 D C 4 0 D C 6 6 S O 3 5 4 D C 1 4 Q U 1 4 R I 1 1 7 R I 1 2 1 D C 2 5 C A 1 8 R I 89RI5PG15PG2 1BN S C U L P T U R E L O C A T I O N S E A T W A L L P A T I O A R B O R S E A T I N G M O N U M E N T S I G N 7 9 D C F E N C E W I T H M A I N T E N A N C E G A T E F E N C E W I T H M A I N T E N A N C E G A T E L O W B E R M LOWBERM C O N C R E T E L E D G E 4 2 S A 7 B P 1 A F 5 8 D L LEGEND/KEY:SODNATIVE STORMWATER PLANTINGSCONCRETE LEDGEOVERSTORY TREEEVERGREEN TREEORNAMENTAL TREESHRUBSPERRENIALS / GRASSES 3 0 ' 6 0 ' 1 5 ' 7 . 5 ' 0 ' 1 " = 3 0 ' S C A L E : 01 WEST LANDSCAPE PLAN P R O J E C T N O : 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2016 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC C D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : SRa SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. D A T E : E N T M 1 6 - 0 4 2 . 1 1 1 / 0 2 / 1 6 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 11/2/2016 CD PKG #1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 530 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 PH: 612.333.3702 WWW.THINKCONFLUENCE.COM 7700 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH CD PACKAGE #1 7700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Terry Minarik 11/02/201642242 L A N D S C A P E P L A N L 1 . 1 KEYQTYMANUFACTURER + MODEL12PICNIC TABLES:PICNIC TABLE 1PICNIC TABLE 2 DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURED SITE FURNISHINGS SCHEDULENOT E S LANDSCAPE FORMS 35 MINGLEBACKLESS 3 SEAT (ADA)COLOR: OCEAN BLUELANDSCAPE FORMS 35 MINGLEBACKLESS 4 SEATCOLOR: OCEAN BLUE6BENCHLANDSCAPE FORMSMULTIPLICITY STRAIGHTBACKLESSCOLOR: SILVER CON T A C T : Mike K o n i e c z n y P:1.2 6 9 . 3 3 7 . 1 3 1 1 44 RECEPTACLES:TRASHRECYCLINGLANDSCAPE FORMSGRASS OPEN TOPCOLOR: SILVERLANDSCAPE FORMSGRASS OPEN TOPCOLOR: OCEAN BLUE5PLANTER/BOLLARD LANDSCAPE FORMS LARKSPUR30" PLANTERCOLOR: LIGHT GRAY5PLANTER/BOLLARD LANDSCAPE FORMS METRO 40RIDE BIKE RACKCOLOR: SILVER 1 G T 1 0 D L 5 C O 1 G T 1 0 D L 1 G T 1 0 D L P R O O F O F P A R K I N G 1 5 S T A L L S P R O O F O F P A R K I N G 1 2 S T A L L S LEGEND/KEY:SODNATIVE STORMWATER PLANTINGSCONCRETE LEDGEOVERSTORY TREEEVERGREEN TREEORNAMENTAL TREESHRUBSPERRENIALS / GRASSES38'-0"40'-0" 1 0 ' 2 0 ' 5 ' 2 . 5 ' 0 ' 1 " = 1 0 ' S C A L E : 01 PLAZA ENLARGEMENT P R O J E C T N O : 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2016 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC C D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : SRa SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. D A T E : E N T M 1 6 - 0 4 2 . 1 1 1 / 0 2 / 1 6 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 11/2/2016 CD PKG #1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 530 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 PH: 612.333.3702 WWW.THINKCONFLUENCE.COM 7700 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH CD PACKAGE #1 7700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Terry Minarik 11/02/201642242 L A N D S C A P E P L A N L 1 . 2 3 0 ' 6 0 ' 1 5 ' 7 . 5 ' 0 ' 1 " = 3 0 ' S C A L E : 0 1 E A S T L A N D S C A P E P L A N KEYQTYMANUFACTURER + MODEL12OUTDOOR DINING TABLES:TABLE 1TABLE 2 DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURED SITE FURNISHINGS SCHEDULENOT E S LANDSCAPE FORMS 35 MINGLEBACKLESS 3 SEAT (ADA)LANDSCAPE FORMS 35 MINGLEBACKLESS 4 SEAT6BENCHLANDSCAPE FORMSMULTIPLICITY STRAIGHTBACKLESS CON T A C T : Mike K o n i e c z n y P:1.2 6 9 . 3 3 7 . 1 3 1 1 44 RECEPTACLES:TRASHRECYCLINGLANDSCAPE FORMSLAKESIDE - GRASS OPEN TOPLANDSCAPE FORMSLAKESIDE - GRASS OPEN TOP5PLANTERSLANDSCAPE FORMS LARKSPUR30" PLANTER5BIKE RACKSLANDSCAPE FORMS METRO 40RIDE BIKE RACK 11 3 x AMIN.30"RADIUS MIN.4"A EACH TREE S H A L L B E P L A N T E D S U C H THAT THE R O O T F L A R E I S V I S I B L E A T T H E TOP OF THE R O O T B A L L . I F T H E R O O T FLARE IS NO T V I S I B L E , T H E S O I L S H A L L B E REMOVED I N A L E V E L M A N N E R F R O M T H E ROOT BALL T O W H E R E T H E F I R S T M A I N ORDER ROO T ( 1 2 " D I A . O R L A R G E R ) EMERGES F R O M T H E T R U N K . S E T M A I N ORDER ROO T 1 " H I G H E R T H A N A D J A C E N T GRADE. DO N O T C O V E R T O P O F R O O T BALL WITH S O I L . S C A R I F Y S I D E S O F T R E E P I T W I T H S P A D E B Y H A N D T O B I N D W I T H P R E P A R E D S O I L . P L A N T I N G P I T T O B E T W O T O F I V E T I M E S T H E D I A M E T E R O F R O O T B A L L , S L O P E D TAMP SOIL A R O U N D R O O T B A L L B A S E FIRMLY WIT H F O O T P R E S S U R E S O T H A T ROOT BALL D O E S N O T S H I F T . DRAINAGE T R E N C H A S R E Q U I R E D P E R PERCOLATI O N T E S T I N S P E C . A U G E R A 4 " DIA. HOLE & F I L L W / 3 4 " G R A V E L . PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOIL.DIG PLANTING PIT 4-6" DEEPER THANROOTBALL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.REMOVE BURLAP, WINE, ROPE ANDWIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL.COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO85% OF MAXIMUM DRY UNITWEIGHT PER ASTM D 698.EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEEPLAN.4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCERBEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL.3" SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCHIN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE.RODENT TRUNK PROTECTION: 12"HARDWIRE-CLOTH MESHCYLINDER. DIMENSIONS: 8"DIAMETER (OR GREATER) X 36"HEIGHT. STAKE IN PLACE,AVOIDING ROOTS. SEE SPEC.NOTE:CONTRACT O R S H A L L B E R E S P O N S I B L E FOR MAINTA I N I N G T R E E S I N A P L U M B POSITION T H R O U G H O U T T H E W A R R A N T Y PERIOD. S T A K I N G A N D G U Y I N G I S MANDATOR Y F O R T R E E S 4 " C A L O R GREATER, A N D A L L B A R E R O O T T R E E S . WRAP TREE T R U N K S O N L Y U P O N APPROVAL B Y L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T . SEE SPECIFI C A T I O N S E C T I O N 3 2 9 3 0 0 . 5' DIAMETE R M U L C H R I N G , T Y P . 3 " S H R E D D E D H A R D W O O D M U L C H ( S E E S P E C I F I C A T I O N S ) F I N I S H E D G R A D E A N D E D G E C O N D I T I O N V A R I E S - S E E P L A N F O R C O N D I T I O N . 3 1 6 " M E T A L E D G E R W / S T A K E , P E R S P E C . S E E P L A N 1 2 " M I N . P R E P A R E S O I L F O R T H E E N T I R E B E D 4" 3 " S H R E D D E D H A R D W O O D M U L C H . D O N O T P L A C E M U L C H I N C O N T A C T W I T H S H R U B S T E M . N O T E : S E E S P E C I F I C A T I O N S E C T I O N R E L A T E D T O E X T E R I O R P L A N T I N G . C O N T A I N E R G R O W N M A T E R I A L S H A L L H A V E R O O T S H A N D L O O S E N E D . M I N . 4 " D E E P E R T H A N R O O T B A L L . S C A R I F Y S I D E S A N D B O T T O M O F E N T I R E B E D W I T H S P A D E B Y H A N D T O B I N D W I T H P L A N T I N G S O I L . U N D I S T U R B E D S U B G R A D E . 4"2" S O D S O I L F R O M S O D C U T T I N G T O P S O I L D I S C E D S U B G R A D E S U B G R A D E S C A L E F A C T O R : 3 " = 1 ' S S S D D 2/3D E D G E O F P L A N T I N G A R E A P L A N T R O W - T Y P . P L A N T C E N T E R - T Y P . TRI A N G U L A R SP A C I N G - ' S ' D I S T A N C E B E T W E E N R O W S - ' D ' T O T A L A R E A P E R P L A N T ( S F ) 12 " 15 " 18 " 2 1 " 2 4 " ( 2 ' ) 3 0 " 3 6 " ( 3 ' ) 4 2 " 1 0 - 1 / 2 " 1 3 " 1 5 - 1 / 2 " 1 8 " 2 1 " 2 6 " 3 1 " 3 6 " 0 . 8 8 1 . 3 5 1 . 9 4 2 . 6 3 3 . 5 0 5 . 4 2 7 . 7 5 1 0 . 5 0 1'- 6"4"MIN.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.STEEL EDGING,AS SPECIFIED MINIMIZE CONTACTW/ PLANT STEM(S)SET TOP OF ROOT CROWN 1" ABOVEFINISHED GRADE. MOUND PLANTINGBED SOIL SLIGHTLY TO TO TOP OFROOT CROWN.ORGANIC MULCH,AS SPECIFIED.TOP OF MULCH IS TO BELOWTOP OF WALK/CURB EXTENDINGA MIN. OF 1'-6" FROM EDGE OFWALK/CURB.5" DEEP MULCH POCKET CONCRETE WALK MAY OCCURNOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTIONRELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING.PLANTING SOIL SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OFENTIRE BED WITH SPACE BY HANDTO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL.3"MIN.CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTS HAVE LOOSENED. N . T . S L 5 . 0 P L A N T I N G B E D M E T A L E D G I N G 0 6 N . T . S L 5 . 0 S O D P L A N T I N G T Y P I C A L 0 3 N . T . S L5.0TREE PLANTING DETAIL07 N . T . S L 5 . 0 T Y P I C A L S H R U B P L A N T I N G 0 4 N.T.SL5.0PERENNIAL PLANTING, TYP.01 N . T . S L5.0PLANT S P A C I N G , T Y P . 02 N . T . S L 5 . 0 T R E E P R E S E R V A T I O N D E T A I L S - T Y P I C A L 0 8 P R O J E C T N O : 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2016 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC C D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : SRa SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. D A T E : E N T M 1 6 - 0 4 2 . 1 1 1 / 0 2 / 1 6 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 11/2/2016 CD PKG #1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 530 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 PH: 612.333.3702 WWW.THINKCONFLUENCE.COM 7700 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH CD PACKAGE #1 7700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Terry Minarik 11/02/201642242 L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S L 5 . 0 N . T . S L5.0PLANTING NOTES05 PLANTING NOTES1. NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.2. PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANTING BEDS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF MULCH, FOR WEED CONTROL.3. NO EXCAVATION OR PLANTING PIT SHALL BE LEFT OPEN OVERNIGHT.4. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1. UNLESS NOTED OTHER W I S E , D E C I D U O U S S H R U B S S H A L L H A V E A T L E A S T 5 C A N E S A T T H E S P E C I F I E D H E I G H T . ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES S H A L L B E G I N B R A N C H I N G N O L O W E R T H A N 6 ' A B O V E P A V E D S U R F A C E . 5. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE ANY PLANT MATERIAL OR ANY DEFECTIVE WORKMANSHIP.6. MEASUREMENT OF CONIFER HEIGHT SHALL INCLUDE NOT MORE THAN FIFTY PERCENT (50%) OF THIS YEARS VERTICAL GROWTH (TOP CANDLE).7. PLANT SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PREC E D E N C E O V E R N O T E S . 8. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE STAKING OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO D I G G I N G . 9. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL ONLY BE ALLOWED WHEN THE CONTRACTOR HAS EXHAUSTED ALL SOURCES FOR THE SPECIFIED MATERIAL, AND HAS PROVEN THAT THE S P E C I F I E D M A T E R I A L I S N O T A V A I L A B L E . T H E C O N T R A C T O R M U S T P R O V I D E N A M E A N D VARIETY OF SUBSTITUTION TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO TAGGING OR PLANTING. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL BE NEAREST EQUIVALENT SIZ E O F V A R I E T Y O F P L A N T H A V I N G S A M E E S S E N T I A L C H A R A C T E R I S T I C S . A D J U S T M E N T S I N LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS.10. PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS.11. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER T H E M A N U F A C T U R E R ' S I N S T R U C T I O N S O R M A Y B E T R E A T E D F O R S U M M E R A N D F A L L INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 10-0-5 OF 12 OZ. PER 2.5" CALIPER TREE AND 6 OZ. PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-0-10 THE F O L L O W I N G S P R I N G I N T H E T R E E S A U C E R . 12. PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 45 P A R T S T O P S O I L , 4 5 P A R T S S C R E E N E D C O M P O S T A N D 1 0 P A R T S S A N D O R A S O T H E R W I S E SPECIFIED.13. TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO-WALLED PLASTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAP SMOOTH-BARKED DECIDUOUS TREES P L A N T E D I N T H E F A L L P R I O R T O D E C E M B E R 1 A N D R E M O V E W R A P P I N G A F T E R M A Y 1 . 14. 3/16" THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS SOD - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOT E D . 15. ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER.16. SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.17. CONIFEROUS TREES ARE TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND SHALL HAVE NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE TREE TRUNK.18. ALL DECIDUOUS, PINE, AND LARCH TREE PLANTINGS SHALL RECEIVE RODENT PROTECTION PER MNDOT 2571.31.2. DO NOT PROVIDE ON SPRUCE TREES.19. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. NO PARTIAL AC C E P T A N C E W I L L B E C O N S I D E R E D . 20. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15.21. CONIFEROUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO OCTOBER 1. FALL DECIDUOUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. A D J U S T M E N T S T O P L A N T I N G D A T E S M U S T B E A P P R O V E D I N W R I T I N G B Y T H E L A N D S C A P E ARCHITECT.22. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THAT EACH EXCAVATED TREE OR SHRUB PIT WILL PERFOLATE (DRAIN) PRIOR TO ADDING TO P S O I L A N D I N T A L L I N G P L A N T M A T E R I A L . T H E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L F I L L T H E B O T T O M O F SELECTED HOLES WITH SIX INCHES OF WATER. THIS WATER SHOULD PERCOLATE WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY A C C U R A C Y A N D E F F E C T O F P E R C O L A T I O N T E S T I N G . I F T H E S O I L A T A G I V E N A R E A D O E S NOT DRAIN PROPERLY, A PVC DRAIN OR GRAVEL SUMP SHALL BE INSTALLED OR PLANTING RELOCATED IF DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.23. SHOULD THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER UNSATISFACTORY SURFACE OR OTHER SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS, SOIL DEPTH, LATENT SOILS, HAR D P A N , S T E A M O F O T H E R U T I L I T Y L I N E S O R O T H E R C O N D I T I O N S T H A T W I L L J E O P A R D I Z E THE HEALTH AND VIGOR OF THE PLANTS, HE MUST ADVISE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF THE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE PLANTS, OTHERWI S E T H E L A N D S C A P E C O N T R A C T O R W A R R A N T S T H A T T H E P L A N T I N G A R E A S A R E S U I T A B L E PROPER GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED.24. ALL HYDRANGEA AND YEW PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM TOP SOIL DEPTH OF 12" WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS MET:24.1. ALL PLANTS PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 2" ABOVE GRADE24.2. BACKFILL ALL PLANTING HOLES WITH A MIX OF SPECIFIED GROWING MEDIUM AND TILLED TOPSOIL.24.3. AMEND TOPSOIL WITH ROOT STIMULANT APPROPRIATE FOR HYDRANGEAS AND YEWS.24.4. VERIFY PLANTING PITS HAVE PASSED PERCOLATION TEST. N . T . S L 5 . 0 L A N D S C A P E S C H E D U L E S 0 9 Ø2 1/2 [Ø67]1 [2]81 1/4 [2064]1 1/4 [2]SELECT TABLETOP OPTION:CATENASTEELHEAD, SOLIDMARNEAUX (SHOWN)OPTIONALUMBRELLA HOLE29 1/4 [746]1 [2]Ø0 [0]STEEL TUBE ALUMINUMPERFORATED PANEL NOTE: ALL TABLES WITH NON-COLLAPSABLEUMBRELLA OPTION MUST BE SURFACE MOUNTED.Ø2 1/2 [Ø67]1 [2]81 1/4 [2064]1 1/4 [2]DETAILPERFORATED PATTERNOPTIONSELECT TABLETOP OPTION:CATENASTEELHEAD, SOLIDMARNEAUX (SHOWN)OPTIONALUMBRELLA HOLE29 1/4 [743]1 [2]Ø0 [0]STEEL TUBE ALUMINUMPERFORATED PANELNOTE: ALL TABLES WITH NON-COLLAPSABLEUMBRELLA OPTION MUST BE SURFACE MOUNTED.ALUMINUMSEAT CASTINGS© ™26"660GRADEAA 28"7113 1/2"90CAST ALUMINUM BODY19"481 2"54SECTION A-A CAST ALUMINUM COVER Ø 1 9 " 4 8 3 2 " 5 1 3 6 " 9 1 6 Ø 2 1 " 5 3 3 Ø 8 1 / 4 " 2 1 1 A D E T A I L A S C A L E 1 : 4 F R E E S T A N D I N G O R S U R F A C E M O U N T O P T I O N S 7 / 1 6 " [ 1 1 ] D I A . M O U N T I N G H O L E S H A R D W A R E S U P P L I E D B Y O T H E R S 7 6 2 3 0 " 2 5 1 " 7 6 2 3 0 " 1 0 1 6 4 0 " 1 0 1 6 4 0 " 1 2 1 9 4 8 " 1 2 1 9 4 8 " 5 1 Ø 2 " D R A I N H O L E N.T.SL5.1BRICK SEAT WALL AT CORNER PLAZA01 P R O J E C T N O : 4200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD SUITE 220 BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PH: 952-996-9662 FX: 952-996-9663 WWW.SRA-MN.COM COPYRIGHT 2016 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC C D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : SRa SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS, INC. D A T E : E N T M 1 6 - 0 4 2 . 1 1 1 / 0 2 / 1 6 ISSUE RECORD ISSUE # DATE DESCRIPTION 11/2/2016 CD PKG #1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 530 NORTH THIRD STREET SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55401 PH: 612.333.3702 WWW.THINKCONFLUENCE.COM 7700 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH CD PACKAGE #1 7700 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55435 PRINT NAME SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Terry Minarik 11/02/201642242 L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S L 5 . 1 N.T.SL5.1MINGLE TABLE, BACKLESS 4 SEAT, SURFACE MOUNT, PERF02N.T.SL5.1MINGLE TABLE, BACKLESS 3 SEAT, SURFACE MOUNT, PERF03N.T.SL5.1RIDE BIKE RACK04 N . T . S L 5 . 1 L A K E S I D E O P E N T O P R E C E P T A C L E S 0 5 N . T . S L 5 . 1 L A R K S P U R 3 0 " P L A N T E R S 0 5 Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: GIS Enterprise Agreement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the purchase of an Enterprise License Agreement for GIS tools and licenses from Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. INTRODUCTION: This is the first year of a three-year enterprise agreement with ESRI for its suite of GIS applications and licenses. This agreement allows City staff access to software tools to improve upon and grow our GIS capabilities. Also included are licenses to allow our staff to efficiently collect data in the field which will provide more timely map updates. Training will also be an important aspect of upcoming GIS improvements and this agreement provides unlimited online training. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: GIS Enterprise Agreement ESRI EA Quote City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Nov. 15, 2016 Mayor and Council ☒ ☐ Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager Request for Purchase: GIS Enterprise Agreement Oct. 28, 2016 NA Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. $35,000 Recommended Quote or Bid: Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Quote #20496808 Information/Background: This is the first year of a three-year enterprise agreement with ESRI for its suite of GIS applications and licenses. This agreement allows City staff access to software tools to improve upon and grow our GIS capabilities. Also included are licenses to allow our staff to efficiently collect data in the field which will provide more timely map updates. Training will also be an important aspect of upcoming GIS improvements and this agreement provides unlimited online training. As we forecast our GIS software needs over the next three years, the enterprise license agreement offers a lower cost than agreements of the past with greater access to software and licenses. Additionally, because licensing is based on population and Edina’s population for 2017 is estimated to be over 50,000, by signing the contract in 2016, we will be able to save tens of thousands of dollars over the next three years, versus signing even in January 2017. It is important to note that this is not an entirely new expense. We currently have 9 ArcGIS online licenses, 1 ArcGIS for Desktop Advanced, 3 ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Concurrent and 3 ArcGIS for Desktop Basic Single Use licenses This only makes licenses available to a few staff members. Our current number of licenses is not meeting the needs of staff and needs to be increased. The Enterprise License Agreement (ELA) will allow all City staff to have access to 100 ArcGIS online licenses and unlimited ArcGIS Desktop licenses. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page 2 IN EXCESS OF $20,000/CHANGE ORDER City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 For 2016, $30,000 of this expense will be paid for out CIP project #15-173. The remaining $5,000 as well as future yearly renewals will be paid for out of the General Fund. These purchases are within budget. Staff recommends we proceed with this agreement. (19,5210(17$/6<67(065(6($5&+,167,787(,1& 1RUWK/D6DOOH6WUHHW6XLWH &KLFDJR,/ 3KRQH )D[ '8161XPEHU &$*(&RGH $06 Quotation # 20496808 Date: Customer # 138683 Contract # 2014MPA1154 &LW\RI(GLQD 3XEOLF:RUNV (QJLQHHULQJ'HSW 0HWUR%OYG (GLQD01 $77(17,21 1LFN/RYHMR\ 3+21( )$; 7RH[SHGLWH\RXURUGHUSOHDVHDWWDFKDFRS\RI WKLVTXRWDWLRQWR\RXUSXUFKDVHRUGHU 4XRWHLVYDOLGIURP 7R October 28, 2016 The items on this quotation are subject to the terms set forth herein and the terms of your signed agreement with Esri, if any, or, where applicable, Esri's standard terms and conditions at www.esri.com/legal, which are incorporated by reference. Federal government entities and government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri's GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Acceptance is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri's products and services. If sending remittance, please address to: Esri, File No. 54630, Los Angeles, Ca 90074-4630 This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.ARAIZAJ For questions contact:Joe Araiza Email:jaraiza@esri.com Phone:312-609-0966 x5383 Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program. 110036 1 Populations of 25,001 to 50,000 Small Government Term Enterprise License Agreement (EA agreement begins on December 1st, 2016 and renews every year on December 1st for the next 3 years at $35k each year. Total for 3yrs will be $105k). 35,000.00 35,000.00 Item Total:35,000.00 Material Qty Description Unit Price Total Estimated Shipping & Handling(2 Day Delivery) :0.00 Contract Pricing Adjust:0.00 Subtotal:35,000.00 Sales Tax:0.00 Total:$35,000.00 (19,5210(17$/6<67(065(6($5&+,167,787(,1& 1RUWK/D6DOOH6WUHHW6XLWH &KLFDJR,/ 3KRQH )D[ '8161XPEHU &$*(&RGH $06 Quotation # 20496808 Date: Customer # 138683 Contract # 2014MPA1154 &LW\RI(GLQD 3XEOLF:RUNV (QJLQHHULQJ'HSW 0HWUR%OYG (GLQD01 $77(17,21 1LFN/RYHMR\ 3+21( )$; 7RH[SHGLWH\RXURUGHUSOHDVHDWWDFKDFRS\RI WKLVTXRWDWLRQWR\RXUSXUFKDVHRUGHU 4XRWHLVYDOLGIURP 7R October 28, 2016 The items on this quotation are subject to the terms set forth herein and the terms of your signed agreement with Esri, if any, or, where applicable, Esri's standard terms and conditions at www.esri.com/legal, which are incorporated by reference. Federal government entities and government prime contractors authorized under FAR 51.1 may purchase under the terms of Esri's GSA Federal Supply Schedule. Acceptance is limited to the terms of this quotation. Esri objects to and expressly rejects any different or additional terms contained in any purchase order, offer, or confirmation sent to or to be sent by buyer. All terms of this quotation will be incorporated into and become part of any additional agreement regarding Esri's products and services. If sending remittance, please address to: Esri, File No. 54630, Los Angeles, Ca 90074-4630 This offer is limited to the terms and conditions incorporated and attached herein.ARAIZAJ For questions contact:Joe Araiza Email:jaraiza@esri.com Phone:312-609-0966 x5383 Esri may charge a fee to cover expenses related to any customer requirement to use a proprietary vendor management, procurement, or invoice program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ignature of Authorized Representative Name (Please Print) Title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ate ESRI QUOTATION TERMS AND CONDITIONS Esri, 380 New York St., Redlands, CA 92373-8100 USA • TEL 909-793-2853 • FAX 909-793-5953 G272 Page 1 of 2 03/26/2015 All quotations are valid for ninety (90) days unless otherwise stated on the quotation form. These prices and terms are valid only for items purchased for use and delivery within the United States. This quotation information is proprietary and may not be copied or released other than for the express purpose of the current system selection and purchase. This information may not be given to outside parties or used for any other purpose without written consent from Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (Esri). To expedite your order, please reference the quotation number on your purchase order. ORDER PROCESS The order process is initiated when Esri receives an original purchase order or some form of advance payment. Several additional documents (e.g., Master License Agreement, credit application, Tax Exemption Certificate) may be required to complete the order process. Generally, the need for these documents varies by the type of software, data, web-enabled services, subscriptions, professional services, or other products ordered, which is determined upon receipt of the purchase order (or advance payment). If delivery must be expedited, please contact your marketing representative for assistance. IMPORTANT! Collectively, these documents contain the authorizations and information necessary to ship proper versions of the software or data on the correct media or to initiate web-enabled services, subscriptions, or professional services. Please return them promptly to avoid unnecessary delays in shipping or delivery. Please return all documents to Esri Customer Service, or as otherwise directed. Please show the following remittance address on your purchase order: Esri, File No. 54630, Los Angeles, CA 90074-4630 ESRI LICENSE AGREEMENTS All Esri software, data, web-enabled services, and subscriptions offered in this quotation are commercial off-the-shelf items developed at private expense and subject to Esri commercial license terms. You may have a signed license agreement on file that covers this order. If so, please reference the license agreement number on your purchase order. Unless a signed license is on file with Esri, Esri software, data, web-enabled services, and subscriptions are subject to the Esri License Agreement included with the deliverable item as an online or click-through agreement. A copy is enclosed. Certain software or data requires a Master License Agreement signed by both parties. Professional services agreements may also include license terms. Some Esri software is copy protected with a software keycode or hardware key, and some software, data, web-enabled services, or subscriptions require registration or a password. You will be given instructions to access the keycode, register, or obtain a password through the Esri website or by other means. MAINTENANCE After expiration of any complimentary period of maintenance that may apply to the licensed software, Esri will quote maintenance payable annually in advance. A reinstatement fee applies when maintenance has lapsed. DATA AND ONLINE SERVICES DISCLAIMER Data and Online Services may contain some nonconformities, defects, errors, or omissions. THE DATA AND ONLINE SERVICES ARE PROVIDED "AS-IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, Esri and its licensors do not warrant that the data and Online Services will meet Licensee's needs or expectations, that the use of the data or Online Services will be uninterrupted, or that all nonconformities can or will be corrected. Esri and its licensors are not inviting reliance on this data or Online Services, and Licensee should always verify actual data or Online Services. G272 Page 2 of 2 03/26/2015 DELIVERY FOB Redlands, CA, USA Software: Allow five (5) days from Esri's receipt of purchase order, signed Software License Agreement(s), and other documents, as required. Hardware: Manufacturer's terms apply. Lead times depend on make/models purchased. Note: Standard delivery method is ground or two (2)-day air for software and surface carrier for hardware. Actual delivery method may vary depending on weight. Other services are available for an additional fee (e.g., overnight delivery). PAYMENT TERMS Net thirty (30) days, on approved credit. Orders less than eight hundred dollars ($800) require prepayment by check or credit card unless your organization is a government agency, university, college, or Fortune 500 company. TAXES This quote includes applicable sales or use taxes for the prices quoted as required by law. The tax amount may change depending on the time lapse between this quote and your order to us. Esri will include applicable sales or use taxes on your invoice unless you provide proof with your order that your organization or use of the product is tax exempt. Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: V.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of October 7, 2016 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Report of October 7, 2016. INTRODUCTION: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the October 7, 2016 Traffic Safety Report at their October 27 meeting and moved to forward the reports to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of October 7, 2016 Draft ETC Minutes, Oct 27, 2016 November 15, 2016 Mayor and City Council Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of October 07, 2016 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 07. The City Engineer, Assistant City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, Public Works Director and Police Lieutenant were in attendance for this meeting. The Transportation Planner was informed of the decisions and did not object to the recommendations. For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included on the October 27 Edina Transportation Commission and the November 15 City Council meeting agendas. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action: A1. Request for a Disability Parking sign at 7011 Lynmar Lane • A child with disabilities needs access to a bus which picks up in front of their residence at 8 am and 4 pm on weekdays. • Cars sometimes park in front of the walkway from home to street. • Requestor would like this completed before winter. • Resident has also reached out to a city council member regarding this request. After review, due to hardship staff recommends placing a Disability Parking sign in front of the residence of 7011 Lynmar Lane. Staff will check with resident annually to confirm the need for the sign. Map: Location of 7011 Lynmar Lane Photo: 7011 Lynmar Lane showing walkout towards the street STAFF REPORT Page 2 A2. Request for a No Left Turn 7:10-8:30 AM at Chapel Lane and Valley View Road • Short left turn lane can lead to extended westbound traffic queuing. • There currently is a sign indicating No Left Turn from 3:10-3:40 PM on School Days. • Westbound motorists often turn left on to Chapel Lane to turn around in the neighborhood and travel back eastbound. • Between 7:15 and 8:30 86 vehicles were counted heading southbound on Chapel Lane. • 90% of vehicles traveling on Chapel lane were heading southbound during this period. After review, given the high number of vehicles traveling westbound on Valley View Road and turning left onto Chapel Lane between 7:10 and 8:30 am, staff recommends adding a sign limiting drivers turning left onto chapel lane during this time. A3. Request for No Parking signs on West 69th Street • During school hours, cars are parking on both sides of the street, making it difficult for vehicles to get through. • Temporary No Parking signs have been placed on the south side of the street (see photo) by the Police Department. • 69th Street has had two instances where the temporary no parking signs have been removed by people other than the Police Department. • Survey responses recommended No Parking on South side of street. • Based on survey responses, residents prefer no parking restricted to during school hours. After review, staff recommends placing ‘No Parking 8 am - 4 pm Mon-Fri’ on south side of West 69th Street as it will improve navigation and sightlines for residents using driveways on West 69th Street. Photo: 69th Street facing East notice: temporary no parking signs on south side of street Map: 69th Street Aerial photo Map: Chapel Lane in reference to Valley View Middle School and Edina High School Photo: Chapel Lane at Valley View Road Notice: No Left turn sign from 3:10-3:40 PM STAFF REPORT Page 3 A4. Request to move a newly placed stop sign at Normandale Road and Benton Avenue • Sign is located on east side of Highway 100 traveling northbound on Normandale Boulevard. • Stop sign is placed past (north of) the new crosswalk by 19 feet leading drivers to stop beyond the crosswalk. • Request to be moved in front (south) of the crosswalk to prevent possible conflicts with pedestrians. After review, staff recommends moving stop sign in front of crosswalk. This request has been forwarded to MnDOT upon changing the crosswalk location at this intersection. Section D: Other Traffic Safety Items handled D1. A resident was concerned with street parking at the intersection of Oaklawn Avenue and 60th Street West. A traffic study resulted with little issue, and will be reviewed again next summer during softball season with Pamela Park use at its peak. D2. A resident was concerned about too many people parking on the wrong side of Halifax Avenue in the Arden Park neighborhood. After analysis, issue has corrected itself. Staff will continue to monitor. D3. A resident at Lochmere Terrace reported a stolen “No Parking” sign in the street. The sign was replaced. D4. Residents’ wanting traffic signal timing change at 70th St and HWY 100 as roadwork is causing backups. This was only a temporary concern with 77th Street Bridge over Highway 100 being closed, leading to heavier traffic at 70th Street and Highway 100. D5. A resident was concerned that the stop lights at Blake Road and Vernon Avenue were mistimed after completed roadwork. After analyzing, lights appeared to work adequately. D6. A resident was looking to move a crosswalk sign located at 5804 Stuart Avenue to the corner of Stuart Avenue and Grove Street. The intersection of Grove Street and Stuart Avenue is an all-way-stop and does not warrant a crosswalk sign. The sign is designated as a School Zone sign and will remain at its current location as it functions as a beginning point for a designated school zone as stated by the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Photo: Location of stop sign past crosswalk Map: Location of intersection at Benton Avenue and Normandale Boulevard Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 1 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Council Chambers October 27, 6:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair LaForce called the meeting to order. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Brown, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Miranda and Olson. Absent at roll call were members Koester, Loeffelholz and Olk. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Olson to remove Item V.I. E. All voted aye. Motion carried. Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Janovy approving the amended meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Miranda approving the edited Sept. 15, 2016, minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. D. Traffic Safety Report of Oct. 7, 2016 A.1. Is this a standard handicap sign? Yes, said Planner Nolan; he was asked if the policy was updated and he said it is on the ‘to do’ list. A.2. What was the reason for the approval? Planner Nolan said queuing issues and many drivers drive into the neighborhood to turn around. It was noted that this would affect service vehicles and they could be setting a precedent with this approval. Planner Nolan will follow up with vehicle count. A.3. Is the street not wide enough for parking on both sides? Planner Nolan said no; he could not recall the street width but said there was difficulty when cars are parked on both sides. It was noted the safety issue was not clear and a determination could not be made without vehicle counts. Also, the decision creates an opportunity for enforcement, but if not enforced there should be fewer restrictions. D.6. This item looks like a denial; why wasn’t it under Section B? Planner Nolan will check and follow up. Motion made by member Olson and seconded by member Bass to forward the Oct. 7, 2016, TSC report to the City Council. Aye: Bass, Boettge, Brown, Iyer, LaForce, Miranda and Olson Nay: Janovy Motion passed. Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Carter A. Schulze, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Public Hearing: Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-443, Resolution No. 2016-114 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council determines the project to be necessary, cost-effective and feasible, Council shall adopt Resolution No. 2016-114, accepting the engineering study and approving Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-427, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. INTRODUCTION: City staff initiated this project. The project reconstructs Olinger Road from Olinger Boulevard to Vernon Avenue, Grove Circle, Berne Circle, and Sherman Circle. It involves narrowing some roadways, changing on-street parking on some roadways, new sidewalk on Olinger Road, new curb and gutter, and upgrading utilities. The overall project cost is estimated at $1,668,765. Funding will be a combination of special assessments, City Utility, and Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. Staff has analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2016-114 Engineering Study Engineering Presentation 11-15-2016 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-114 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-427 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 18th day of October, 2016, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA-427, the proposed improvement of Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 15th day of November, 2016, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: November 15, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Special Meeting of November 15, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Special Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk ENGINEERING STUDY COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Berne Circle, Grove Circle, Olinger Road, Sherman Circle IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-443 November 1, 2016 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this feasibility study was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 44908 11-01-16 Carter Schulze Reg. No. Date 2 ENGINEERING STUDY – BA-443 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS November 1, 2016 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of local concrete and bituminous streets, replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, construction of new concrete sidewalks, and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $1,668,765. The estimated roadway construction cost is $784,370 and will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $14,766 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $794,900 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Sidewalk improvements are estimated to cost $89,495 and will be funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclists Safety (PACS) fund. The project can be completed during the 2017 construction season. Staff believes the project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to improve the infrastructure, and complies with Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure,” as well as the City’s Living Streets Policy. LOCATION: The project includes Berne Circle, Grove Circle, Olinger Road, and Sherman Circle. A detailed location map of the Countryside G project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 3 INITIATION: The Countryside G Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, and pedestrian facilities. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways The streets in this neighborhood were originally constructed between 1968 and 1979 (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Countryside G neighborhood, 1971 All of the streets in the neighborhood have concrete curb and gutter, and the average roadway width is 31’ (measured from the back of curb to the back of curb). A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area showed the roadway section varies from 1.5” to 7” of bituminous pavement over a sandy clay and gravel base. An example of the current street condition can be seen in Photo 2. Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 4 Photo 2: Existing Pavement Condition As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc.). The average PCI for the City of Edina is 61 and the average PCI for Countryside G is14. Traffic and Crash Data Due to recent construction activity on Olinger Boulevard, Blake Road, and Vernon Avenue adjacent to the project area, staff was not able to measure traffic volumes and speeds within the project area. Historical data shows average daily traffic volumes around 810 vehicles per day with 85th percentile speeds around 35 miles per hour. Traffic and crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system consists of 8” and 9” vitrified clay pipe (VCP), installed between 1967 and 1978. Historical records indicate there have been few sewer back-ups or blockages in the area (see Appendix B). Watermain The watermain system consists of 6” cast iron pipe (CIP) and ductile iron pipe (DIP), 1.5” and 2” copper pipe installed between 1967 and 1978. The overall system has experienced a relatively small amount of breaks (see Appendix B). The fire hydrants are original to the neighborhood. Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 5 Storm Sewer The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundary of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD). The system consists of 12” and 15” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) installed between 1967 and 1978. Multi-Modal Transportation Sidewalk Facilities There are no sidewalks within the project area; however, there are bituminous trails on Vernon Avenue adjacent to the project area, as well as along Olinger Boulevard connecting to Bredesen Park to the south (see Appendix C). Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area; however, there are bike lanes and shared bike lanes on Vernon Avenue and Olinger Boulevard immediately adjacent to the project area (see Appendix D). Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications, and cable utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are a combination of overheard and underground facilities located in backyards or along the boulevards. Street lighting consists of standard “cobra head” lights mounted on wood poles located throughout the project area as shown in Appendix E. DESIGN INPUT: Staff All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update (the “Plan”), the Living Streets Policy, the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan, and sustainable project evaluation. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 7 of the Plan addresses locations of proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities within the City. As shown in Appendix C, there are proposed sidewalk facilities on Olinger Road between Vernon Avenue and Olinger Boulevard. Appendix D shows no proposed bicycle facilities within the project area. Living Streets Policy The Living Streets Plan was adopted by the City Council on May 6th, 2015 (see Appendix F). The vision statement of the Living Streets Policy expresses the need to look at future projects differently: Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Staff has included elements that pertain to residential neighborhoods in the rehabilitation of the infrastructure and replacement of the roadways. Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 6 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan The CWRMP identified potential manhole surcharging in the 10-year and 100- year frequency events. There were no areas of structural flooding identified. Sustainability Staff has also included elements of sustainable engineering into this project. Sustainability in engineering means delivering our services in a manner that ensures an appropriate balance between the environment, the community, and available funding. This is essentially the “Triple Bottom Line” of sustainability; Equity, Environment, and Economy. Staff views sustainability as maximizing our resources, creating lasting environments, and improving and shaping our community so that future generations are not burdened by the decisions of today. The project was evaluated based on the following key indicators to look for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks. • Equity: How well does the project provide or maintain core city services such as transportation, sanitation, clean water, emergency access, and emergency service? How does the project influence the well-being of the community? • Environment: How does the project influence the natural environment, such as surface or ground water health, forest canopy, natural resource diversity, wildlife habitat, air quality, noise, and others? • Economy: How does the project influence the local economy? What are the short term and long term costs? Is the continued service worth the price? The following is a summary of this evaluation: Equity: The project maintains access and mobility to the transportation network. Where available, this includes transportation options for a variety of user groups including, but not limited to, children, seniors, and disabled individuals. In addition, the project improves mobility for different types of users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Updates to the fire hydrants provide public safety staff the ease of connection needed during an emergency. Environment: The project provides homeowners a piping system to discharge groundwater into, eliminating standing water, ice, and algae buildup along the curb lines. Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work, thus protecting the existing natural environment. The project also analyzes the sanitary sewer to ensure that inflow and infiltration of clear water is kept out of the system, which minimizes regional wastewater treatment. Bituminous pavements will be recycled on- site, minimizing truck traffic to and from the site. Economy: The project is designed to reduce construction costs now and into the future. The new roadway section can easily be maintained long-term with Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 7 the use of proactive sealcoating and mill and overlays. These maintenance operations will significantly extend the life of the pavement. The project will also use less disruptive construction methods, such as trenchless technology (i.e., pipebursting, cured-in-place liners). Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works department. They expressed a desire to replace water services throughout the project area. Engineering works closely with Public Works to prioritize improvements based on need, existing conditions, and budget. Police/Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire departments. The Fire Department requested verification of the turning radii of its large vehicles in narrow roadway areas. They also suggested additional No Parking signage be placed near corners and in cul-de-sacs to facilitate emergency vehicles access. The Fire Department supports watermain and hydrant improvements, and suggested that hydrants locations should be determined with snow storage practices in mind. Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on September 15, 2016, the draft Countryside G Engineering Study was provided for review. The ETC had no comments on this project. Relevant minutes from the ETC meeting are included in Appendix G. Residents As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3 years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to an open house on September 28th, 2015. Materials from this meeting are available on the City’s website, or upon request. Two questionnaires were mailed to affected property owners soliciting feedback for the design of this project. The first was a multi-modal traffic survey, which inquired about ways to promote safe driving, bicycling, and walking. This survey was mailed on June 17th, 2016, and was completed and returned by 20 of 57 property owners, a return rate of 35%. The following is a summary of feedback received from residents: • 7 of 20 (35%*) were satisfied or very satisfied with the speed of traffic in the neighborhood; 8 (40%) were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. • 7 (35%) were satisfied or very satisfied with motorist behavior in the neighborhood; 7 (35%) were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. • 9 (45%) identified an unsafe intersection within the neighborhood. • 18 (90%) walk, run, or jog in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. • 9 (45%) ride a bicycle in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 8 • 1 (5%) reported parking on the street at least 2-3 times per week; 14 (70%) reported parking on the street less than once per month. *Percentages based on number of returned surveys A second questionnaire was mailed to property owners on June 17th, 2016, inquiring about sump drains, local drainage problems, street lighting, and other project-related concerns. This survey was completed and returned by 26 of 57 property owners, a return rate of 46%. The following is a summary of feedback received from the residents: • 15 of 26 (58%*) reported having drain tile or a footing drain on their property. • 16 (62%) reported having a sump pump on their property. • 14 (54%) identified localized drainage problems in the neighborhood. • 5 (19%) favored upgrades to existing street lighting. *Percentages based on number of returned surveys The full questionnaires and responses can be found in Appendix H. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on July 25th, 2016 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood and others proposed for construction in 2017. The meeting was attended by 12 residents representing 7 properties. Materials from this meeting can be found in Appendix I. Resident input regarding the project was also received in the form of emails, which can be found in Appendix J. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: Roadways Typical Section The bituminous roadway sections are proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. The existing pavement and suitable aggregate material will be recycled for use as base material in the new roadway where feasible. A minimum of 8” of recycled gravel material will be graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous base and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. Berne Circle, Grove Circle, and Sherman Circle are designated as Local Streets in the Living Streets Plan, while Olinger Road is designated as a Local Connector. Per the design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan, Local Streets without sidewalks have a typical width of 28’ (measured from the back of curb to the back of curb) and Local Connectors have a typical width of 25’ with a 5’ grass boulevard and 5’ sidewalk on one side. Pavement Maintenance The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. With proactive maintenance procedures, including sealcoating and overlays, the design life of the entire roadway can be extended considerably. Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 9 Parking Per the Living Streets Plan, on-street parking should be evaluated based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand, and construction and maintenance costs. As the majority of the land use in this neighborhood is residential, and given the existing demand for parking, staff believes that two- sided parking on Berne Circle, Grove Circle, and Sherman Circle is appropriate. As a Local Connector, staff is recommending one-sided parking on Olinger Road. As parking is preferred on the same side of the road as the sidewalk for pedestrian safety, the location of the parking is determined by the location of the sidewalk. The existing and proposed street widths, sidewalk width, and parking recommendations are shown in Table 1. Street Existing Roadway Width (back to back), feet Proposed Roadway Width (back to back), feet Sidewalk Width, feet Boulevard Width, feet Parking Berne Circle 31 28 - - Two-sided Grove Circle 31 28 - - Two-sided Olinger Road 31 25 5 5 West side only Sherman Circle 31 31 - - Two-sided Table 1: Street Widths, Sidewalks, and Parking Roadway Signage All street signs, including street name blades, within the project area will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix D). All new signs shall conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer has been televised, and portions of the main will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) methods. These repairs will address the issues of sags, cracks, and groundwater infiltration into the trunk sewer. The manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain A non-invasive pipe condition assessment was performed on the watermain within the project area, and staff has reviewed historical break data to determine the extent of improvements needed. Portions of the existing watermain will be replaced using a combination of pipebursting and open cut methods. Existing 1.5” and 2” pipes will be replaced with 6” mains, and all gate valves and fire hydrants within the project area will be replaced. Given only one recorded service break and one main break, staff is only recommending replacing water services associated with watermain replacements. Additional hydrants will be installed to meet current public Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 10 safety standards. The new fire hydrants will include the Storz nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. Storm Sewer Based on existing conditions and the scope of utility work, new concrete curb and gutter will be installed on Berne Circle, Grove Circle, and Olinger Road, providing a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater. Portions of the curb and gutter on Sherman Circle will be repaired, and the roadway width will not be altered. Curb and gutter within cul-de-sacs will be replaced to reduce the paved surface areas. The storm sewer network will have modifications to resolve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Multi-Modal Transportation Sidewalk Facilities Staff is proposing a 5’ concrete boulevard-style sidewalk along the west side of Olinger Road from Vernon Avenue to Olinger Boulevard. Figure 2 shows the existing and proposed sidewalk facilities. Figure 2: Existing and Proposed Sidewalk Facilities Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 11 The location was selected by staff based on existing topography, available right-of-way, potential construction conflicts, and connection to existing facilities. The grass boulevard that will separate the new curb and the proposed sidewalk will be 5’-wide for the majority of the length of the street, but may vary to 3’-wide depending on existing conflicts. The separation from vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment, and the 5’- width is preferred by Public Works for snow storage. The extra width needed for the sidewalk and boulevard will be balanced between both sides of the street where feasible. All pedestrian curb ramps will be constructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This sidewalk is recommended based on Edina’s Sidewalk Facilities map. It will provide a connection to existing pedestrian facilities on Vernon Avenue and in Bredesen Park, and future pedestrian facilities on Olinger Boulevard. As this sidewalk is not along a Municipal State Aid route nor included in the Active Routes to School Plan, it will not be maintained by the City. Bicycle Facilities There are no proposed bicycle facilities within the project area. Private Utilities Staff met with representatives of several private utility companies on September 7th, 2016 to notify them of the proposed 2017 reconstruction projects and discuss preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. Currently, the City does not have a standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved. Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies. The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections; therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting. The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works, and other City staff. RIGHT-OF-WAY & EASEMENTS: Existing right-of-way in this neighborhood varies from 50’ to 75’. It is anticipated that the majority of this project can be constructed within existing ROW. A ROW permit from Hennepin County will be required for work that occurs within Vernon Avenue. Many properties have vegetation, boulders, retaining walls, or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary work. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $1,668,765 (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical, and construction finance costs Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 12 from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. The estimated roadway construction cost is $784,370 and will be funded by special assessments. Utility improvements amount to $794,900 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Sidewalk improvements amount to $89,495 and will be funded through the PACS fund. Item Amount Total Cost Roadway Total: $784,370 Sanitary Sewer $ 182,480 Watermain $ 323,940 Storm Sewer $ 288,480 Utility Total: $794,900 Sidewalk Total: $89,495 Project Total: $1,668,765 Table 2: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statues. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 53.12 residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Countryside G project area, as shown in Appendix K. The estimated assessment per REU is $14,766 (see Figure 3). Figure 3: Preliminary Assessment Map Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 13 The formulas for calculating REUs are described below: Previously Assessed Single-Family Residential Lots 5924 Amy Dr and 5936 Grove St; = 0 REU (previous assessment for Amy Dr and Grove St in 2015) 5813 and 5829 Olinger Rd; = 1 REU - 0.33 REU (previous assessment for Amy Dr and Grove St in 2015) = 0.66 REU Single-Family Residential Corner Lots 5916 Olinger Blvd; 5701 Olinger Rd; 6100, 6101, 6129, and 6133 Sherman Cir; = 0.5 REU (partial access off Olinger Blvd or Vernon Ave) Two-Family Residential Lots 6000, 6004, 6008, 6012, 6016, 6020 Berne Cir; = 1 REU x 0.8 (duplex REU factor) = 0.8 REU All other properties are single-family residential located entirely within the project area and will be subjected to an assessment of 1 REU. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: FEASIBILITY: Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Countryside G Neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Traffic and Crash Data B. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks Project Open House 2015 September 28th, 2015 Neighborhood Informational Meeting July 25th, 2016 ETC Engineering Study Review September 15th, 2016 Receive Engineering Study November 1st, 2016 Public Hearing November 15th, 2016 Bid Opening March/April 2017 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2017 Complete Construction Fall 2017 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2018 Engineering Study Countryside G Neighborhood Improvements BA-443 November 1, 2016 14 C. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Sidewalk Facilities D. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities E. Streetlights and Signs F. Living Streets Policy G. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes H. Property Owners Questionnaires I. Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials J. Correspondence from Residents K. Preliminary Assessment Roll APPENDIX A Traffic and Crash Data Countryside G Traffic and Crash Data Traffic Data Location Street Classification Year Average Daily Traffic 85th% Speed, mph 1 Olinger Rd Local Connector 2007 811 35.0 Crash Data Location Street Severity Year Month Time A Olinger Rd Property Damage - Collision with Parked Vehicle 2008 March 8:15 AM APPENDIX B Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks !( !( !( !( 6005 5804 6105 5725 5902 5806 6021 5917 5705 5906 6017 5717 5709 5717 5824 6024 5901 5816 5912 58126112 6100 6136 6 1 0 0 -3 6 5829 5912 5808 5801 5720 5616 6137 5721 6141 6117 6016 5721 6133 6109 5936 6016 6012 57256050-78 6108 5920 6016-20 5920 6113-41 6101 6104 5916 6128 6000 6113 6017 6129 6004 5908 5813 6020 6036 5916 5914 5916 6028 5910 6012 6124 6117 6108 6008 6008 60166100 5916 6132 6004 6109 5917 6105 6104 6104 6033 5908 6112 5924 60046101 5 9 0 8 61086112 6024 5932 6025 5909 5609 5909 6037 6032 60006000 5913 5909 5920 5612 5924 6125 5908 5616 6 1 2 0 6116 5912 5613 6116 5905 5904 5920 5924 5928 5817 6 0 0 0 6055-67 60 1 2 6 0 0 4 6 0 0 8 5 8 2 4 5 8 2 5 5 8 2 0 5 8 2 7 5 8 2 2 57035701 58315829 5 8 3 3 PROJECT LIMITS SHERMAN CIR GROVE CIR V E R N O N A V E O L I N G E R R D OLINGER BLVD GROVE ST AMY DR B E R N E C I R /Engineering DeptOctober 2016 Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksCountryside G Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-443C I T Y O F E D I N A MIN N E S O T A INCORPOR A T E D 188 8 ,e Sewer BlocksWatermain Breaks APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Sidewalk Facilities Map ¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñBraemar Golf Course Bredesen Park Rosland Park Pamela Park Lewis Park Highlands Park Walnut Ridge Park Todd Park Garden Park Heights Park Van Valkenburg Park Fred Richards Golf Course Creek Valley Park Lake Edina Park Krahl Hill Normandale Park Weber Field Park Arneson Acres Park Countryside Park Alden Park Utley Park Yorktown Park Wooddale Park Arden Park York Park Cornelia Park Strachauer Park Fox MeadowPark Edinborough Park KojetinPark McGuirePark BirchcrestPark SherwoodPark Melody LakePark Williams Park ChowenPark St. John'sPark TingdalePark BrowndalePark GrandviewSquare FrankTupa Park Courtney Fields ?ÞA@ ?úA@+¡ ?úA@ ?ÞA@ +¡ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake C e n t e n n i a l L a k e Minnehaha Creek Ni ne Mile C r eek Nine Mile Creek C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St PetersLutheran School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance PublicLibrary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool HighlandSchool EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace School SouthviewMiddleSchool CountrysideSchool Valley ViewMiddle School Creek Valley School NormandaleElementary EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessor CalvinChristianSchool FireStation B L A K E R D S C H A E F E R R D V E R N O N A V E F R A N C E A V E S X E R X E S A V E S C A H I L L R D 70TH ST W 66TH ST W Y O R K A V E S INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W G L E A S O N R D 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W /Engineering DeptOctober 2016 Legend ExistingSidewalk City of EdinaSidewalk Facilities FutureActive RoutesTo School Sidewalk Future State-Aid Sidewalk FutureCity Sidewalk FutureNine Mile CreekRegional Trail APPENDIX D City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map æ ¹» ¹» æ æ æ æ æ¹»æ æ ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹»æ æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ ¹º æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ æ ñ æ ¹º ñ æ ñ ?ÞA@ )y ?úA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake C e n t e n n i a l L a k e AldenPark VanValkenburgPark FoxMeadowPark HighlandsPark Todd Park Weber FieldPark KojetinPark BrowndalePark WooddaleParkWilliamsParkUtleyPark FrankTupaPark SherwoodPark ArdenPark YorkPark ChowenPark PamelaParkSt JohnsPark StrachauerPark RoslandPark BristolParkCorneliaPark ArnesonAcresPark LakeEdinaParkFred RichardsGolf Course YorktownPark EdinboroughPark GardenPark MelodyLakePark TingdalePark CountrysidePark BredesenPark WalnutRidgePark KrahlHill Creek Valley Park HeightsPark NormandalePark McGuirePark LewisParkBraemar Park and Golf Course(Courtney Fields) Minnehaha Creek Nine Mile Creek Nine Mile Creek C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St Peters Lutheran Church & School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance CalvaryChurchPublicLibrary ConcordSchool EdinaCovenant CorneliaSchool ColonialChurch HighlandSchool CalvaryLutheran EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace Church& School SouthviewJr High CrossviewLutheran CountrysideSchool St Albans Episcopal Valley ViewJr High Creek Valley School NormandaleLutheran WooddaleChurch St PatricksCatholic New CityCovenantChurch NormandaleElementary St StephensEpiscopal EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessori CalvinChristianSchool GoodSamaritanMethodist EdinaMorningsideChurch ChristPresbyterianChurch ChapelHillsCongregtional Shepard of the HillsLutheran Edina Community Lutheran Church FireStation B l a k e R d V e r n o n A v e F r a n c e A v e S X e r x e s A v e S C a h i l l R d 70th St W Interlachen Blvd Maloney Ave 4 4 t h S t W 50th St W 54th St W 58th St W G l e a s o n R d 70th St W 76th St W Dewey Hill Rd Valley View Rd Valley View Rd Minnesota Dr78th St W W o o d d a l e A v e T r a c y A v e Parklawn Ave C o n c o r d A v eBenton Ave Gle a so n R d M a l i b u R d G r e e n F a r m s R d M c C a u l e y T r l S M i r r o r L a k e s D r Lincoln Dr W a s h i n g t o n A v e Division St V e r n o n A v e Golf Ter C o d e A v e W i l r y a n A v e N o r m a n d a l e R d W e s t S h o r e D r C o r n e l i a D r F r a n c e A v e S Y o r k A v e S 77th St W O h m s L n Hilary Ln Olinger Blvd 66th St W A n t r i m R d 63rd St W X e r x e s A v e S 69th St W B u s h L a k e R d M e t r o B l v d 66th St W 62nd St W Valley Ln B r o o k s i d e A v e ?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y 74th St W V a l l e y V i e w R d Engineering DeptOctober 2016 / Bicycle FacilitiesBike Routes (signed and/or marked as) Green Shared Bike LanesAdvisory Bike Lanes Bike LanesBike Boulevards Signed Bike Routes Bike or Shared Use Paths Shared Lane MarkingsApproved Primary RouteApproved Secondary Route O:\Users\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Comprehensive.mxd APPENDIX E Streetlights and Signs 6005 5804 6105 5725 5902 5806 6021 5917 5705 5906 6017 5717 5709 5717 5824 6024 5901 5816 5912 58126112 6100 6136 6 1 0 0 -3 6 5829 5912 5808 5801 5720 5616 6137 5721 6141 6117 6016 5721 6133 6109 5936 6016 6012 57256050-78 6108 5920 6016-20 5920 6113-41 6101 6104 5916 6128 6000 6113 6017 6129 5908 5813 6020 6036 5916 5914 5916 6028 5910 6012 6124 6117 6108 6008 6008 60166100 5916 6132 6004 6109 5917 6105 6104 6104 6033 5908 6112 5924 60046101 5 9 0 8 61086112 6024 5932 6025 5909 5609 5909 6037 6032 60006000 6029 5913 5920 5612 5924 6125 5908 5616 6 1 2 0 6116 5912 5613 6116 5920 5924 5928 5817 6 0 0 0 6055-67 6 0 1 2 6 0 0 4 6 0 0 8 5 8 2 4 5 8 2 0 5 8 2 7 5 8 2 2 57035701 58315829 5 8 3 3 PROJECT LIMITS SHERMAN CIR GROVE CIR V E R N O N A V E O L I N G E R R D OLINGER BLVD GROVE ST AMY DR B E R N E C I R Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass Xcel EnergyPostop LanternFiberglassXcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round Xcel EnergyPostop LanternFiberglass Xcel EnergyCoach LanternFiberglass Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass Xcel EnergyTrad Ladder RackFiberglass /Engineering DeptOctober 2016 StreetlightsCountryside G Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-443C I T Y O F E D I N A MIN N E S O T A INCORPOR A T E D 188 8 ,e !"$ !"$ !"$ !"$ !"$ 89:z !"$ 1238!"$ !"$ 6005 5804 6105 5725 5902 5806 6021 5917 5705 5906 6017 5717 5709 5717 5824 6024 5901 5816 5912 58126112 6100 6136 6 1 0 0 -3 6 5829 5912 5808 5801 5720 5616 6137 5721 6141 6117 6016 5721 6133 6109 5936 6016 6012 57256050-78 6108 5920 6016-20 5920 6113-41 6101 6104 5916 6128 6000 6113 6017 6129 5908 5813 6020 6036 5916 5914 5916 6028 5910 6012 6124 6117 6108 6008 6008 60166100 5916 6132 6004 6109 5917 6105 6104 6104 6033 5908 6112 5924 60046101 5 9 0 8 61086112 6024 5932 6025 5909 5609 5909 6037 6032 60006000 6029 5913 5920 5612 5924 6125 5908 5616 6 1 2 0 6116 5912 5613 6116 5920 5924 5928 5817 6 0 0 0 6055-67 6 0 1 2 6 0 0 4 6 0 0 8 5 8 2 4 5 8 2 0 5 8 2 7 5 8 2 2 57035701 58315829 5 8 3 3 PROJECT LIMITS SHERMAN CIR GROVE CIR V E R N O N A V E O L I N G E R R D OLINGER BLVD GROVE ST AMY DR B E R N E C I R /Engineering DeptOctober 2016 SignsCountryside G Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-443C I T Y O F E D I N A MIN N E S O T A INCORPOR A T E D 188 8 ,e 89:z W14-11238R2-1 !"$R1-1 D3-X1 Signs APPENDIX F Living Streets Policy 1 Living Streets Policy Introduction Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets and the principles and plans that will guide implementation. The Living Street Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving, reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such as the “do.town” effort related to community health, and the Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Street Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. For example, the Living Streets Policy will support the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which addresses mandates established under the Clean Water Act. The Living Streets Policy provides the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how the Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design process. Lastly, existing and future supporting plans such as the Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to Schools, Sidewalk Priority Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan will help to identify which projects are priorities with respect to this Policy. Living Streets Vision Edina is a place where... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Living Streets Principles The following principles will guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. 2 All Users and All Modes The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes. Connectivity • The City will design, operate, and maintain a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel. • The City will seek opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation. This includes preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way, and adding new rights-of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit. • The City will prioritize non-motorized improvements to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas. • The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. • Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Application • The City will apply this Living Streets Policy to all street projects including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation, or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • The City will act as an advocate for Living Street principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. • Living Streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of smaller improvements or maintenance activities over time. • The City will draw on all sources of transportation funding to implement this Policy and actively pursue grants, cost sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • All City departments will support the vision and principles outlined in the Policy in their work. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving, and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of the project proposal. 3 Exceptions: • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair, or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway, or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands, or other critical areas. Design The City will develop and adopt guidelines as part of the Living Streets Plan to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines will allow for context-sensitive designs. The City’s design guidelines will: • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial and collector streets and on local connector streets as determined by context. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations, and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update the Living Streets Plan. Context Sensitivity Although many streets look more or less the same, every street is a unique combination of its neighborhood, adjacent land uses, natural features, street design, users, and modes. To accommodate these differences, the City will: • Seek input from stakeholders; • Design streets with a strong sense of place; • Be mindful of preserving and protecting natural features, such as waterways, trees, slopes, and ravines; • Be mindful of existing land uses and neighborhood character; and 4 • Coordinate with business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts. Benchmarks and Performance Measures The City will monitor and measure its performance relative to this Policy. Benchmarks demonstrating success include: • Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling; • Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely; • Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably; • An active way of life is available to all; • There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries; • No unfiltered street water flows into local waterways; storm water volume is reduced; and • Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. The City will draw on the following data to measure performance. Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Speed statistics of vehicles on local streets. Implementation The goal of this Policy is to define and guide the implementation of Living Streets principles. Several steps still need to be taken to reach this goal. The first step will be to develop a Living Streets Plan to guide the implementation of the Policy. The Plan will: • Identify and implement standards or guidelines for street and intersection design, universal pedestrian access, transit accommodations, and pedestrian crossings; • Identify and implement standards or guidelines for streetscape ecosystems, including street water management, urban forestry, street furniture, and utilities; • Identify regulatory demands and their relationship to this Policy (ADA/PROWAG, MPCA, MNMUTCD, MnDOT state aid, watershed districts); • Define the process by which residents participate in street design and request Living Streets improvements; and • Define standards for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to ensure access to key public, private and regional destinations. 5 Additional implementation steps include: • Communicate this Policy to residents and other stakeholders; educate and engage on an ongoing basis; • Update City ordinances, engineering standards, policies and guidelines to agree with this Policy; • Inventory building and zoning codes to bring these into agreement with Living Streets principles as established by this Policy; • Update and document maintenance policies and practices to support Policy goals; • Update and document enforcement policies and practices to ensure safe streets for all modes; • Incorporate Living Streets concepts in the next circulation of the City’s general plans (Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to School Plan, etc.); • Incorporate Living Streets as a criteria when evaluating transportation priorities in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP); • Review and update funding policies to ensure funding sources for Living Streets projects; and • Coordinate with partner jurisdictions to achieve goals in this Policy. APPENDIX G Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 1 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Room September 15, 6:00 p.m. VI. Reports/Recommendations C. 2017 Neighborhood and MSA Street Reconstruction Draft Engineering Studies Planner Nolan said streets would be narrowed per their practice for streets with or without sidewalk. Mr. Andrew Scipioni, engineering technician with the engineering department, asked for feedback on the following studies. • Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction No comment. J F M A M J J A S O N D SM WS # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME TERM (Date) 6/21 Bass, Katherine 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Boettge, Emily 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Brown, Andy 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 90% Iyer, Surya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Loeffelholz, Ralf 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Janovy, Jennifer 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Miranda, Lou 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Olson, Larry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Koester, David (student) 9/1/2017 1 1 100% Olk, Megan (student) 9/1/2017 1 1 100% Ding, Emily (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 2 20% Ruehl, Lindsey (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 40% TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE APPENDIX H Property Owners Questionnaires June 17, 2016 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Countryside G Neighborhood Dear Resident: Some streets in your neighborhood are scheduled for roadway reconstruction and utility improvement for the summer of 2017. See the attached map identifying the project area. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING Please plan to attend this meeting on Monday, July 25, 6 to 8 p.m. at the Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, 7450 Metro Blvd, to learn about how projects are funded, a typical construction timeline, how you will be impacted and how you can prepare. A meeting reminder will be mailed to you approximately two weeks prior. MULTI-MODAL ONLINE SURVEY The City would like your input regarding multi-modal traffic in your area – multi-modal describes a roadway system that is designed to safely accommodate all users. Now is the perfect time to identify and evaluate areas where we can make improvements to promote safe walking, bicycling and driving. Reconstruction gives us the opportunity to address concerns. Your responses will help us design a project that reflects your neighborhood needs balanced with design elements from the City’s strategic planning documents such as the Comprehensive Plan, the Sidewalk Facilities Map, Living Streets Plan, and the Active Routes to School Plan. Your input is important to us! Please take the survey within the next 30 days. To complete the survey online, visit www.surveymonkey.com/r/CountrysideG. Completing the survey should only take about 15 minutes. Please complete one survey per household and include as much information as you can regarding safety concerns. If you would prefer a paper copy of the survey, please call 952-826-0449 and Engineering Specialist Sharon Allison will mail one to you. UTILITY QUESTIONNAIRE The enclosed questionnaire focuses on utilities such as storm sewer, irrigation, etc. Please read the instructions, fill out the questionnaire and return it to us in the enclosed envelope by July 8. Your responses will help us design the project. Components of a project vary and are based on both the condition of the infrastructure and questionnaire responses. If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-826-0443 or cschulze@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering Specialist Sharon Allison at 952-826-0449 or sallison@EdinaMN.gov. Sincerely, Carter Schulze, PE Assistant City Engineer Enc: Project Map, Questionnaire Instructions, Questionnaire, Return Envelope 6005 5804 6105 5725 5902 5806 6021 5917 5705 5906 6017 5717 5709 5717 5824 6024 5901 5816 5912 58126112 6100 6136 6 1 0 0 -3 6 5829 5912 5808 5801 5720 5616 6137 5721 6141 6117 6016 5721 6133 6109 5936 6016 6012 57256050-78 6108 5920 6016-20 5920 6113-41 6101 6104 5916 6128 6000 6113 6129 6004 5908 5813 6020 6036 5916 5914 5916 6028 5910 6012 6124 6117 6008 6008 60166100 5916 6132 6004 6109 5917 6105 6104 6033 5908 5924 60046101 5 9 0 8 61086112 6024 5932 5909 5909 6037 6032 60006000 5913 5909 5920 5612 5924 6125 5908 5616 6 1 2 0 6116 5912 5613 6116 5905 5904 5920 5924 5928 5817 6 0 0 0 6055-67 60 1 2 6 0 0 4 6 0 0 8 5 8 2 4 5 8 2 5 5 8 2 0 5 8 2 7 5 8 2 2 57035701 58315829 5 8 3 3 PROJECT LIMITS SHERMAN CIR GROVE CIR V E R N O N A V E O L I N G E R R D OLINGER BLVD GROVE ST AMY DR B E R N E C I R /Engineering DeptJune 2016 2017 Project AreaCountryside G Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-427C I T Y O F E D I N A MIN N E S O T A INCORPOR A T E D 188 8 ,e How satisfied are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street?* Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. How satisfied are you with the volume of traffic or the number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? * Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. How satisfied are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Examples of poor motorist behavior include speeding, rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively.) * Very Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or running If yes, which intersection? Do you feel that any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? Yes No Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, running How frequently do you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never If you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) If you don't walk, jog or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never Any additional comments about parking? How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Residential streetlights are funded by special assessment. Is the existing streetlight system meeting the needs in your neighborhood? Yes No Do you favor improving the streetlights in your neighborhood? Yes No Do you favor improving the streetlights with either a different style light or more lights? Yes No Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Do you have access to email to participate in City Extra email updates when construction begins? Yes No Name Street Number Street name* Age Presenting Gender Number of people in household Number age 65 and over. Number age 18 and under Number of members in household with a physical disability impacting their ability to walk, ride a bicycle or drive. COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY How satisfied are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Why is it an issue or concern? How satisfied are you with the volume of traffic or the number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Why is it an issue or concern? 5924 amy dr Satisfied Satisfied 6028 Berne Dissatisfied Vernon and Olinger Road rush hour, Wish there was a stop light or bumps to make it more user-friendly for children, walkers, rush hour is terrible Dissatisfied vernon and olinger road rush hour--difficult to answer this question. Berne Circle is fine (our street) but neighborhood would include Vernon 5813 Olinger Road Neutral Satisfied Olinger Road 5902 Olinger Rd Neutral Dissatisfied olinger road lots of trucks - through street 5801 Olinger Road Dissatisfied City of Edina dump trucks hauling snow to dump in Bredesen Park speed up and down the Olinger Road hill. Fear for our lives as we drive into or out of our driveway. Satisfied 5917 Olinger Road Neutral Neutral 5910 Olinger Rd Satisfied Very Dissatisfied Olinger Rd There's been heavy traffic since the Tracy Ln and Olinger Blvd detours 5806 Olinger Road Very Dissatisfied Olinger Road and Vernon Avenue speed too fast going down hill on Olinger Road. Vernon Ave. - no reason speed should increase to 40 mph for a short segment of road with many intersections, driveways and pedestrian traffic. Very Dissatisfied Olinger Road and Vernon Avenue Olinger Road is used as an unnecessary cut through. Has been TERRIBLE this Summer with the road construction. Vernon Avenue is much worse though with people cutting through to avoid traffic on 62. 40 mph speed limit (people have natural tendancy to go faster) in a residential neighborhood 5804 Olinger Road Very Dissatisfied Olinger Road, from Vernon to the Blvd. There are numerous people walking with dogs down to the park and the cars speed by, there has already been one dog hit and killed by a motorist the dog was on a leash. Thats is just one I know about. The street should absolutely have sidewalks because of it's access to the park and the traffic of bikes, people and dog going down there. Dissatisfied Olinger Road Only dissatisfied because the width and safety (need sidewalks) of the street isn't in line with the foot traffic and bikes going down to the park. 5725 Olinger Rd Neutral Dissatisfied Olinger Rd There has been a large increase in traffic due to the construction on Tracy Avenue which is frustrating as it is not clear why Tracy construction has been completed yet. Address COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY How satisfied are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Why is it an issue or concern? How satisfied are you with the volume of traffic or the number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Why is it an issue or concern?Address 5725 Olinger Rd Dissatisfied Olinger Rd from Vernon Avenue to Olinger Blvd My family and I walk on the street to Bredesen Park and traffic can be unsafe, especially with Tracey Avenue being closed at Highway 62 Dissatisfied Olinger Rd from Vernon Ave to Olinger Blvd My family and I walk on the street to get to Bredesen Park and I'm concerned about our safety, I wish there were sidewalks 5906 Olinger Road Satisfied Neutral Olinger Road Too many garbage trucks. Too many city trucks hauling snow, etc causing damage the residents have to pay for, they could use Olinger Blvd which I don't thing the home owners who live on it get assessed for repairs 5824 Olinger Road Very Dissatisfied Intersection of Olinger Road and Amy Drive Drivers exceeding the speed limit northbound and southbound on Olinger Road Dissatisfied Intersection of Olinger Road and Amy Drive Commuters cutting through the neighborhood vs traveling to the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Olinger Boulevard 5808 Olinger Road Very Dissatisfied Northbound and southbound traffic on Olinger Road is a problem, cars exceed the speed limit. Safety for children crossing the street to board bus on Grove Street and bicyclists on street. Very Dissatisfied Olinger Road has high traffic. General safety of children and bicyclists. 5816 Olinger Road Neutral Dissatisfied Olinger Road City trucks hauling especially in winter with parking on both sides of the street. 5801 Olinger Road Dissatisfied Olinger Rd from Vernon to Olinger Blvd. City of Edina dump trucks speed going down the road and going up the road when hauling snow to be dumped in the Bredesen Park parking lot. All other traffic seems to obey the motor vehicle laws. Satisfied 6132 Sherman Circle Very Satisfied Very Satisfied 6125 Sherman Circle Very Satisfied Neutral 6128 Sherman Circle Neutral Satisfied 6120 Sherman Circle Very Satisfied Very Satisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY How satisfied are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Examples of poor motorist behavior include speeding, rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively.) If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Why is it an issue or concern? In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Do you feel that any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? If yes, which intersection? 5924 amy dr Satisfied No 6028 Berne Satisfied Yes Vernon and Olinger Road 5813 Olinger Road Satisfied Olinger Road Sidewalks are not necessary and could be dangerous because of the slope. No 5902 Olinger Rd Satisfied Walking, jogging or running No 5801 Olinger Road Dissatisfied Speeding City of Edina dump trucks; other traffic is OK. Driving Yes Vernon & Olinger Rd. as well as Olinger Rd. & Olinger Blvd. 5917 Olinger Road Very Dissatisfied Speeding on both Olinger Road and Blvd. Lots of pedestrians and dog walkers Walking, jogging or running No 5910 Olinger Rd Satisfied No 5806 Olinger Road Very Dissatisfied Olinger Road and Vernon intersection (biggest concern). Olinger Road and Olinger Blvd (less of a concern) Turning onto Vernon from Olinger Road (and Highwood Drive in turn) can be nearly impossible during multiple times during the day. High speeds on Vernon (40 mph or over many traveling over the speed limit) passing when we are turning, tailgating when turning, being tailgated when I follow the speed limit which is MUCH too fast for a residential neighborhood. This 40 mph speed limit is unacceptable, especially when it's folks using it as a cut-through to avoid traffic on 62 and DO NOT need to use the road to access their home, school or business. Olinger Road - traffic goes much too fast down the hill. Olinger Road is a majorly used road for Walking, jogging or running Yes Olinger Road and Vernon - speed on Vernon and # cars make it dangerous. There is also an issue at Olinger Blvd (to a lesser extent) with the pedestrian traffic crossing Olinger Blvd to Bredesen trails. And third intersection of concern is Olinger Road and Grove. Folks also use this path as a "shortcut" to Countryside. I've watched many cars pass our bus when the bus' stop sign is out. 5804 Olinger Road Dissatisfied Olinger Road The cars can't see pedestrians at the top of the road because of the hill and are going too fast to be able to stop, NEED SIDEWALKS!!! A dog on leash was killed by a car a few weeks ago. Walking, jogging or running Yes Olinger Road and the Blvd when turning at the bottom of the road onto to the blvd going left, you can't see cars because of obstructions, trees, the curve in the road and you have to pullout and really lean forward to see. 5725 Olinger Rd Neutral Walking, jogging or running No Address COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY How satisfied are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Examples of poor motorist behavior include speeding, rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively.) If dissatisfied or very dissatisfied, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Why is it an issue or concern? In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Do you feel that any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? If yes, which intersection?Address 5725 Olinger Rd Neutral Walking, jogging or running Yes Vernon Avenue and Olinger Rd 5906 Olinger Road Satisfied No 5824 Olinger Road Very Dissatisfied Intersection of Olinger Road and Amy Drive Safety compromised by speeding through neighborhood Walking, jogging or running Yes Olinger Road and Amy Drive 5808 Olinger Road Very Dissatisfied All of Olinger Road. Safety Bicycling Yes Grove Street and Olinger Blvd. 5816 Olinger Road Dissatisfied All intersecting streets along Olinger Road. Loud noise from car speakers Stops signs ignored. Disturbing the peace.Walking, jogging or running Yes Grove Street and Olinger Road. Amy Drive and Olinger Road 5801 Olinger Road Satisfied Yes Olinger Rd. at Olinger Blvd. 6132 Sherman Circle Very Satisfied No 6125 Sherman Circle Neutral Walking, jogging or running No 6128 Sherman Circle Neutral Bicycling No 6120 Sherman Circle Very Satisfied No Neutral Walking, jogging or running COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 5924 amy dr 6028 Berne Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Lack of marked crosswalk Walking, jogging, running 5813 Olinger Road Sidewalks are not necessary and could be dangerous because of the slope. 5902 Olinger Rd 5801 Olinger Road Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Walking, jogging, running 5917 Olinger Road 5910 Olinger Rd 5806 Olinger Road Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Drivers turning corner too fast Unnecessarily fast speed limit on Vernon for a very short distance - this area is just as residentially dense as other areas of city where speed limit is 25 or 30. Driving 5804 Olinger Road Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Lack of marked crosswalk Insufficient Lighting There should maybe be a four way stop there Driving 5725 Olinger Rd Bicycling Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply)Address COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply)Address 5725 Olinger Rd Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Insufficient Lighting There are potholes that fill with water at the corners when it rains Driving 5906 Olinger Road 5824 Olinger Road Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers turning corner too fast General motorist disregard for speed laws Walking, jogging, running 5808 Olinger Road Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Bicycling 5816 Olinger Road Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers turning corner too fast Walking, jogging, running 5801 Olinger Road Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Lack of marked crosswalk Major entry into Bredesen Park with poor sight lines and an uncontrolled intersection. This should be a four-way stop intersection. Walking, jogging, running 6132 Sherman Circle 6125 Sherman Circle Issues with sight lines or clear view Driving 6128 Sherman Circle 6120 Sherman Circle COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY How frequently do you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood? If you don't walk, jog or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 5924 amy dr Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise 6028 Berne Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) 5813 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Sidewalks are not necessary and could be dangerous because of the slope. I have lived on Olinger Road for 25 years. Sidewalks are not necessary and could be dangerous because of the slope. there has not been any accidents and a run and bike here every day. 5902 Olinger Rd Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) 5801 Olinger Road Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise 5917 Olinger Road Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise most cross Olinger Rd to get mail 5910 Olinger Rd Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise 5806 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) no sidewalks in addition to all other things mentioned previously. 5804 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) 5725 Olinger Rd Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) If you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply)Address COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY How frequently do you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood? If you don't walk, jog or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that If you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply)Address 5725 Olinger Rd Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Enjoy nature at Bredesen Park 5906 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise 5824 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) 5808 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) 5816 Olinger Road Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise 5801 Olinger Road Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise 6132 Sherman Circle Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise 6125 Sherman Circle Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Health/exercise 6128 Sherman Circle Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) 6120 Sherman Circle Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car 5924 amy dr Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) 6028 Berne Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Children use for travel bc don't drive 5813 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise A bike lane would be OK but I have lived on Olinger Road for 25 years. Sidewalks are not necessary and could be dangerous because of the slope. there has not been any accidents and a run and bike here every day. 5902 Olinger Rd Rarely (less than once per month)Health/exercise 5801 Olinger Road Never 5917 Olinger Road Never Do not bike 5910 Olinger Rd Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise 5806 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) many kids and folks entering Bredesen park walking, jogging, bicycling Amount of traffic. 5804 Olinger Road Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Health/exercise Bike lanes aren't obeyed well, don't really trust the motorists because the streets aren't wide enough, especially Olinger Road 5725 Olinger Rd Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Health/exercise The number of potholes on Olinger Rd and Tracy sometimes impact how often I might go bike riding Address If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Address If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) 5725 Olinger Rd Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Health/exercise I think a bike lane on Olinger Rd to connect to the new bike lanes on Olinger Blvd and Vernon Ave would be helpful 5906 Olinger Road Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise 5824 Olinger Road Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) 5808 Olinger Road Very frequently (daily or near daily)Health/exercise 5816 Olinger Road Never Too old. 5801 Olinger Road Never Don't own bicycles 6132 Sherman Circle Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise 6125 Sherman Circle Never 6128 Sherman Circle Frequently (2-3 times per week)Health/exercise Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Motorist behavior towards bicycles 6120 Sherman Circle Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Health/exercise COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY Street No.Street name How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? Any additional comments about parking? Residential streetlights are funded by special assessment. Is the existing streetlight system meeting the needs in your neighborhood? Do you favor improving the streetlights in your neighborhood? Do you favor improving the streetlights with either a different style light or more lights? Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Email access to City Extra? 5924 amy dr Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Very satisfied Yes No No While busy traffic is satisfactory few if any accidents or injuries have occurred Yes 6028 Berne Frequently (2-3 times per week) Frequently (2-3 times per week)Neutral Yes No No Yes 5813 Olinger Road Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Very satisfied Yes No No I have lived on Olinger Road for 25 years. Sidewalks are not necessary and could be dangerous because of the slope. there has not been any accidents and a run and bike here every day. Yes 5902 Olinger Rd Never Frequently (2-3 times per week)Satisfied Yes No No Yes 5801 Olinger Road Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Very satisfied Yes No No Adding a sidewalk to Olinger Rd. is a very unwise proposal. The North end of Olinger Rd. basically dead-ends at Vernon Ave., a County Road with a 40 mph speed limit that is often exceeded. This intersection has stop signs on both Olinger and Highwood Drive but no marked crossing on Vernon; the only safe places to cross Vernon are at Tracy Ave. which is 1/4 mile to the East and Blake Rd. 1/8 mile to the West; these two intersections have marked crosswalks and semiphores with Walk/Don't Walk indicators. Both already have sidewalks and both connect to Bredesen Park. Why in the world would one put their or their family's lives at risk just so you could walk on this proposed sidewalk. By the way, the Highwood and Parkwood neighborhoods to the North do NOT have sidewalks, with the exception of Blake Rd. Yes 5917 Olinger Road Never Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Satisfied Yes No Yes 5910 Olinger Rd Rarely (less than once per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Neutral Yes No No We like that our street is relatively DARK at night, and don't want special assessments to brighten the road. Yes 5806 Olinger Road Never Rarely (less than once per month)Very satisfied Yes No Yes Too much traffic in general which I don't know if it's possible to fix. We need some traffic calming though. Vernon speed limit must remain consistent throughout Edina - 30 MPH - just stupid to increase the speed limit for a short distance. I cannot think of any other two lane roads in Edina that are in purely residential neighborhoods that are 40 MPH. Speed bumps or something similar for folks coming down the Olinger Road Hill....not only does people speed increase coming down the hill, but there are many blind spots coming down the hill. We will not encourage people to drive less if we do not make pedestrian areas safe and neighborhoods surrounding Bredesen Park are very pedestrian oriented. Many young people, active people, old people, pets with too many cars traveling too fast on Vernon. Yes 5804 Olinger Road Never Never Dissatisfied We have a long driveway so it isn't necessary for us but a few times in our living there, 15 years, for extremely large parties, but our neighbors can't really park on Olinger Road safely, it's too narrow, no sidewalk for the pedestrians then which are a major issue as it is a thoroughfare to get down to the park. No No Yes Olinger Road is a major thoroughfare foe people walking and walking their dogs down to Bredesen Park, there has been one dog killed that was on a leash, that could have been a person. That road needs a sidewalk for the safety of people and pets. Yes 5725 Olinger Rd Rarely (less than once per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Very satisfied No Yes I would love to have a sidewalk on Olinger Rd which can connect Vernon to Olinger Blvd, at least on one side of the street to make it easier to move up and down the street with small children. Yes COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY Street No.Street name How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? Any additional comments about parking? Residential streetlights are funded by special assessment. Is the existing streetlight system meeting the needs in your neighborhood? Do you favor improving the streetlights in your neighborhood? Do you favor improving the streetlights with either a different style light or more lights? Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Email access to City Extra? 5725 Olinger Rd Never Rarely (less than once per month)Very satisfied No Yes Yes The street that I live on (Olinger Rd) has many potholes that are frustrating for biking, walking and driving. I would like to have sidewalks and a bike path on my residential street and additional street lights. Yes 5906 Olinger Road Rarely (less than once per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Very satisfied Yes No No Yes 5824 Olinger Road Olinger Road Rarely (less than once per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Neutral Yes No No Yes 5808 Olinger Road Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Satisfied Yes No No DO NOT PUT A SIDEWALK IN AS PART OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECT UNLESS THE CITY WILL HANDLE SNOW REMOVAL!!!! SLOPE OF STREET WILL CREATE AN UNSAFE BOBSLED RUN IN THE WINTER!!!!!! Yes 5816 Olinger Road Never Rarely (less than once per month)Neutral Street is too narrow to have parking on both sides, especially in the winter. Yes No No Yes 5801 Olinger Road Rarely (less than once per month)Never Very satisfied We do not want a sidewalk on Olinger Rd. It is a waste of taxpayer money to onstruct Yes No No We do not want a sidewalk on Olinger Rd. It would be a waste of taxpayer money to build and maintain it. People already cross a busy County Road (Vernon Ave.) at Olinger Rd. and Vernon Ave. at this uncontrolled intersection while there is a controlled intersection just two blocks away at Blake and Vernon that already has sidewalks. The City of Edina should not be encouraging people to cross Vernon at Olinger Rd. because of the traffic at tbis unco trolled intersection. Yes 6132 Sherman Circle Rarely (less than once per month) Rarely (less than once per month)Very satisfied Yes No No Yes 6125 Sherman Circle Rarely (less than once per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Very satisfied Yes Yes Yes Yes 6128 Sherman Circle Rarely (less than once per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Very satisfied Yes No No Yes 6120 Sherman Circle Rarely (less than once per month) Occasionally (1-4 times per month)Very satisfied Yes No No Yes COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY Name Street No.Street name Age Gender Number of people in household Number age 65 and over. Number age 18 and under Number of members in household with a physical disability impacting their ability to walk, ride a bicycle or kirk swenson 5924 amy dr 46-55 Male 4 0 2 0 Amelia 6028 Berne 46-55 Female 4 0 2 0 Richard Jahnke 5813 Olinger Road 56-65 Male 4 0 0 0 Laurie Eckberg 5902 Olinger Rd 46-55 Female 3 0 1 0 Ken & Twyla Rush 5801 Olinger Road Over 65 Male 2 2 0 0 Karen Ostman 5917 Olinger Road Over 65 Female 3 2 0 0 Alan Benson 5910 Olinger Rd 26-35 Male 2 0 0 0 Suzanne & Guy Logan 5806 Olinger Road 46-55 Female 5 0 3 0 Carla Young 5804 Olinger Road 56-65 Female 2 0 0 0 David Simons 5725 Olinger Rd 26-35 Male 2 0 0 0 COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY MULTI-MODAL SURVEY Name Street No.Street name Age Gender Number of people in household Number age 65 and over. Number age 18 and under Number of members in household with a physical disability impacting their ability to walk, ride a bicycle or Amanda Simons 5725 Olinger Rd 26-35 Female 2 0 0 0 jim sletten 5906 Olinger Road 56-65 Male 2 0 0 0 Tim Balfany 5824 Olinger Road Olinger Road 46-55 Male 4 0 1 0 Steve Jensen 5808 Olinger Road 56-65 Male 3 0 0 0 Virginia and Tonu Lang 5816 Olinger Road Over 65 Female 2 2 0 0 Ken & Twyla Rush 5801 Olinger Road Ray and Barbara Drew 6132 Sherman Circle Over 65 Male 2 2 0 0 Yina Ha 6125 Sherman Circle 56-65 Female 2 1 0 0 Patrick Morton 6128 Sherman Circle 46-55 Male 4 0 2 0 Steve Gilfix 6120 Sherman Circle 46-55 Male 3 0 0 0 Resident Questionnaire Instructions 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Thank you for your time. Your responses to the attached questionnaire will help us design your neighborhood’s project. Here is background information that will help you in filling out the questionnaire. Each numeral relates to the corresponding survey question. I. Drainage Service Connection A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner’s lawn. There are several sump pump drainage issues to look for. First, if your lawn drains back to your house, sump pump discharges can cause problems with your lawn, your neighbor’s lawn or your basement. If the sump pump discharge runs down the gutter line, it can promote algae growth in the street. Finally, discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system using floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both by City Ordinance and State Statute. To prevent the issues mentioned above, your street reconstruction project could include a City sump drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. If the topography and final street designs favor a sump drain system, you could connect to it. That is why survey questions I.C. and I.D. ask about your sump pump preferences. Keep in mind that installation of the pipe from your house to the City sump drain system would be your responsibility, including plumbing modification at your house connection. However, the City sump drain system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund. II. Local Drainage Problems As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if storm water run-off stands in the street or sidewalk in front of your house. If this or similar situations are occurring in your area, please describe it in this section of the questionnaire. We will review for possible corrective action. III. Private Underground Utilities It is very important that you fill out this section. Some residents install private underground utilities in the roadway right-of- way (the area from the edge of the roadway to your property line). The most common private utilities include lawn irrigation and pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can damage these utilities. If they are damaged during the street reconstruction project, they will be repaired. However, if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, crews can attempt to avoid damaging them during construction. IV. Residential Streetlights As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks residents for their input on neighborhood streetlight systems. Staff is trying to understand if the neighborhood favors upgrading the streetlight system or if the existing streetlight system meets the needs of the neighborhood. Upgrades include the style or number of lights. Please keep in mind that costs associated with improving the streetlight system would be a special assessment. These costs would be determined after the extent of the improvements is understood. V. Email Updates One of the primary tools for communicating with you during construction is the City Extra email notification service. The City Extra service is free and allows you to sign up to receive email messages from the City regarding this project. By signing up for City Extra email notification service, you will receive weekly project updates during construction. The updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited, when your water may be shut off for water main replacement and when to have your contractor repair your irrigation system if it was damaged during construction. You will be notified at a later date when to sign up for City Extra email updates. Need Help? If you have any questions about how to fill out the questionnaire, please contact Assistant City Engineer Carter Schulze at 952-826-0443 or cschulze@EdinaMN.gov or Engineering Specialist Sharon Allison at 952-826-0449 or sallison@EdinaMN.gov. YOUR HOUSE CURB LINE ROW ROW CURB LINE EXAMPLE HOUSE GARAGE X SERVICECONNECTION PIPE HERE Resident Questionnaire Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Thank you in advance for your time. Your input is important to us. Please read the Questionnaire Instructions before completing this questionnaire. I. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tile/footing drain? Yes No Unknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? Yes No Unknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump Yes No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains Yes No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? Please sketch in the space to the right: your house, garage, driveway, sump pump discharge location and approximately where along the right-of-way (ROW) line you would like the service connection pipe located. II. Local Drainage Problems Please describe specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: III. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City’s right-of-way? (The right-of- way is typically 10’ to 15’ behind the roadway.) Yes No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City’s right-of-way? Yes No IV. Residential Streetlights: A. Residential streetlights are funded by special assessment. Is the existing streetlight system meeting the needs of the neighborhood? Yes No B. Do you favor improving your streetlights? Yes No C. Please describe your specific ideas for improving the streetlights. ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ V. Email Updates A. Do you have access to email to participate in the City Extra email notification service? Yes No Thank you for completing the questionnaire. Please return it in the enclosed envelope by July 8. CO U N T R Y S I D E G N E I G H B O R H O O D R E C O N S T R U C T O N 20 1 6 P R O P E R T Y Q U E S T I O N N A I R E IM P R O V E M E N T N O . B A - 4 2 7 Dr a i n a g e Lo c a l D r a i n a g e P r o b l e m s Ye s No Un k n Ye s No Un k n Ye s No Ye s No Ex p l a i n Ye s No Ye s No Ye s No Ye s No Yes No Ho u s e # St r e e t N a m e 66 2 0 Be r n e C i r 1 1 1 1 1 Ra i n c o l l e c t s i n t h e m i d d l e o f B e r n e C i r . 1 1 1 1 1 Non-operational irrigation system. 60 3 2 Be r n e C i r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 60 1 6 Gr o v e C i r 1 1 1 1 1 On e w i t n e r o u t o f t h e 3 w i n t e r s I l i v e h e r e , g r o u n d wa t e r c a m e u p t o s u r f a c e a t b a s e m e n t , w h e n s p r i n g ca m e ( s n o w m e l t e d ) . 1 1 1 1 1 60 2 4 Gr o v e C i r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 60 1 2 Gr o v e C i r 1 1 1 1 1 Ba c k y a r d - n a t u r a l w a t e r f l o w . 1 1 1 1 59 1 6 Oli n g e r B l v d 1 1 1 1 1 Ho u s e b e t w e e n u s a n d t h e n o r t h o n O l i n g e r R d h a s hu g e d r a i n a g e p r o b l e m s - a t l o w p o i n t o f t h e i r pr o p e r t y , a t o u r f e n c e l i n e s . F i l l s e v e r y t i m e i t r a i n s . 1 1 1 1 1 58 1 6 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 No o n t h i s l o t . 1 1 1 1 Li k e w h a t w e h a v e . 1 58 0 1 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 1 No n e 1 1 1 1 Le a v e e v e r y t h i n g j u s t l i k e i t cu r r e n t l y i s . 1 58 2 9 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 58 1 3 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 1 N/ A 1 1 1 1 1 59 0 6 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 58 2 4 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 1 No n e 1 1 1 1 We a r e s a t i s f i e d w i t h t h e c u r r e n t lig h t i n g . 1 57 2 5 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 1 Wa t e r d r a i n a g e s e e m s t o s t a y i n p o t h o l e s a n d qu i c k l y e r o d e t h e s t r e e t - p e r h a p s t h e r e c o u l d b e mo r e s t o r m d r a i n s ? F o r m y h o u s e I l i v e o n a h i l l s o wa t e r d r a i n s a w a y f r o m o u r h o u s e . 1 1 1 1 Th e o n e s o n O l i n g e r R d a r e ou t d a t e d a n p l a c e d f a r a p a r t a n d th e y p r o v i d e m i n i m a l l i g h t a t ni g h t i m e w h e n I ' m w a l k i n g . 1 59 1 7 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 Wa t e r c o l l e c t s i n b a c k y a r d a f t e r h e a v y r a i n s o r sn o w m e l t . 1 1 1 1 1 58 0 4 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 1 A l o t o f w a t e r a c c u m l a t e s b e t w e e n o u r h o u s e s 5 8 0 4 & 5 8 0 6 o n t h e p r o p e r t y l i n e g o i n g d o w n t h e h i l l a t t h e bo t t o m o f t h e h i l l . 1 1 1 1 Mo r e l i g h t s a n d b r i g h t e r . 1 58 1 2 Oli n g e r R d 1 1 1 1 1 No n e . 1 1 1 1 1 61 3 6 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 1 1 Bla k e R i d g e d r a w s d i r e c t l y n e x t t o o u r h o u s e . 1 1 1 1 1 61 2 9 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 Ho u s e s e e m s t o b e a t a l o w p o i n t . S u m p p i t a l w a y s ha s w a t e r . S u m p p u m p r u n s o f t e n . W a t e r d o e s n o t se e m t o d r a i n a w a y f r o m h o u s e e a s i l y . C o m m o n pr o b l e m i n m a n y h o u s e s i n S h e r m a n C i r . 1 1 1 1 Mo r e s t r e e t l i g h t s a l o n g S h e r m a n Cir ( a n d a l o n g O l i n g e r n e a r t h e cu r r e n t h o m e s ) . 1 61 3 2 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 1 1 No p r o b l e m i n f r o n t o f m y h o m e , b u t s t a n d i n g w a t e r on s t r e e t j u n c t i o n o f S h e r m a n C i r w i t h i t s c u l d e s a c be t w 6 1 2 8 a n d 6 1 3 3 . 1 1 1 1 1 61 0 4 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 Dr a i n a g e o n t h e s t r e e t f r o m t o w n h o u s e s a b o v e t h e pr o p e r t i e s . 1 1 1 1 1Approximately 10 years ago, the City agreed to connect my sump pumps (2) to the City storm sewers. This was done due to the City not properly sitiyng surrunding home sites. This variance shouldbe in your files. 61 1 6 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 1 1 Th e r e i s c o n s t a n t w a t e r d r a i n a g e f r o m t h e f r o n t r i g h t co r n e r o f o u r l o t ( r i g h t a s y o u l o o k f r o m t h e s t r e e t ) . Wa t e r w i l l d r a i n e v e n a w e e k a f t e r t h e l a s t r a i n f a l l . 1 1 1 1 Ho w a b o u t r e p l a c i n g t h e l i g h t b u l b th a t i s b u r n t o u t . 1 Email Access Specific ideas for improvement Re s i d e n t i a l S t r e e t l i g h t s AD D R E S S Re t u r n e d Su r v e y Su m p P u m p D i s c h a r g e S e r v i c e L i n e Pr i v a t e U n d e r g r o u n d Ut i l i t i e s Dr a i n t i l e o r Fo o t i n g D r a i n Ha s a S u m p Pu m p Wi l l i n g t o Co n n e c t t o Ci t y D r a i n Wi l l i n g t o Co n n e c t Ro o f Dr a i n s Ir i g g a t i o n sy s . i n bl v d . P e t f e n c e Ex i s t i n g me e t s ne e d s Fa v o r s im p r o v i n g G: \ E N G \ C O N S T \ I M P R S \ B A 4 2 7 C o u n t r y s i d e G ( 2 0 1 7 ) \ D E S I G N \ FE A S I B I L I T Y \ Q U E S T I O N N A I R E \ Q u e s t T a b . x l s x 10 / 2 6 / 2 0 1 6 1 of 2 CO U N T R Y S I D E G N E I G H B O R H O O D R E C O N S T R U C T O N 20 1 6 P R O P E R T Y Q U E S T I O N N A I R E IM P R O V E M E N T N O . B A - 4 2 7 Dr a i n a g e Lo c a l D r a i n a g e P r o b l e m s Ye s No Un k n Ye s No Un k n Ye s No Ye s No Ex p l a i n Ye s No Ye s No Ye s No Ye s No Yes NoEmail Access Specific ideas for improvement Re s i d e n t i a l S t r e e t l i g h t s AD D R E S S Re t u r n e d Su r v e y Su m p P u m p D i s c h a r g e S e r v i c e L i n e Pr i v a t e U n d e r g r o u n d Ut i l i t i e s Dr a i n t i l e o r Fo o t i n g D r a i n Ha s a S u m p Pu m p Wi l l i n g t o Co n n e c t t o Ci t y D r a i n Wi l l i n g t o Co n n e c t Ro o f Dr a i n s Ir i g g a t i o n sy s . i n bl v d . P e t f e n c e Ex i s t i n g me e t s ne e d s Fa v o r s im p r o v i n g 61 3 3 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 1 1 Ou r s u m p p u m p d r a i n s o n o u r l a w n n e a r t h e s t r e e t . So m e o f t h i s d r a i n s i n t o t h e s t r e e t g u t t e r . M y n ' b o r (6 1 3 7 ) i s c u r r e n t l y d r a i n i n g t h e i r s u m p p u m p d i r e c t l y in t o m y y a r d , w h i c h i s c a u s i n g p r o b l e m s . T h e y a r e un w i l l i n g t o a d d r e s s t h i s . 1 1 1 1 1 61 0 9 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 1 1 No n e . 1 1 1 1 1 61 2 0 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 1 Ou r p r o p e r t y r e c e i v e s a n e x t r e m e a m o u n t o f w a t e r ru n o f f f r o m t h e B l a k e R i d g e t o w n e h o m e s b e h i n d us . T h i s h a p p e n s d u r i n g a n y r a i n a s w e l l a s t h e i r in t e n t i o n a l l y d r a i n i n g t h e i r p o o l i n o u r d i r e c t i o n . W e ha v e a d r a i n p i p e t h a t a t t e m p t s t o m a o v e t h i s r u n of f a w a y f r o m o u r h o u s e . 1 1 1 1 1 61 2 8 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 61 2 5 Sh e r m a n C i r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Brighter lights should be much better. 1 26 15 8 3 16 8 2 5 15 5 18 13 13 2 24 21 5 5 20 23 3 Su r v e y s Se n t 57 46 % 2 6 % 1 4 % 5 % 2 8 % 1 4 % 4 % 9 % 2 6 % 9 % 3 2 % 23 % 2 3 % 4 % 4 2 % 3 7 % 9 % 9 % 3 5 % 40% 5 % Su r v e y s Re t u r n e d 26 10 0 % 5 8 % 3 1 % 1 2 % 6 2 % 3 1 % 8 % 1 9 % 5 8 % 1 9 % 6 9 % 50 % 5 0 % 8 % 9 2 % 8 1 % 1 9 % 1 9 % 7 7 % 88% 1 2 % G: \ E N G \ C O N S T \ I M P R S \ B A 4 2 7 C o u n t r y s i d e G ( 2 0 1 7 ) \ D E S I G N \ FE A S I B I L I T Y \ Q U E S T I O N N A I R E \ Q u e s t T a b . x l s x 10 / 2 6 / 2 0 1 6 2 of 2 APPENDIX I Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials 10/26/2016 1 The CITYof EDINA 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting July 25, 2016 The CITYof EDINA2017 Projects •In-House Projects o - Birchcrest A/Countryside B –224 properties o - Countryside G – 60 properties o - Chowen Park D – 8 properties •Consultant Project •- Parklawn Avenue (Municipal State Aid) – 20 properties www.EdinaMN.gov 2-C The CITYof EDINAAgenda •Introductions •Timeline •Project Scope •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Communication •How to Prepare •Q&A www.EdinaMN.gov 3-C The CITYof EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4-C Introductions Director of Engineering Engineering Technicians Engineering Coordinator Chad Millner Sharon Allison Tom Haataja Andrew Scipioni Derek Northenscold Assistant Transportation Environmental City Engineer Planner Engineer Carter Schulze Mark Nolan Ross Bintner Charlie Gerk Mohamed Mohamed Jon Moore The CITYof EDINAProject Process www.EdinaMN.gov 5-C The CITYof EDINATypical Project Timeline www.EdinaMN.gov 6-C July – September 2016 Engineering studies/estimates provided November - December 2016 Public hearings January – March 2017 Plan preparation and bidding April – May 2017 Construction begins October – November 2017 Construction concludes Spring 2018 Warranty work Fall 2018 Final assessment hearing 10/26/2016 2 The CITYof EDINA •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •- Extends pavement life •- Maximizes economies of scale •Prioritized based on; •- Pavement condition •-Age of original construction •- Utility issues www.EdinaMN.gov 7-A Why My Street? The CITYof EDINAWhy Reconstruct? •Streets originally constructed in 1940s-1980s (30-70 years old) •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, sealcoat) www.EdinaMN.gov 8-A The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Plan •Approved by City Council May 6, 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit riders •Incorporates •- Minimum roadway design elements •- Sidewalk Facilities Plan •- Bicycle Facilities Plan •-Active Routes to School Plan www.EdinaMN.gov 9-C The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Roadway •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Most streets have curb and gutter •Many properties already have concrete driveway aprons www.EdinaMN.gov 10-A The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains www.EdinaMN.gov 11-A •Sanitary Sewer - Inflow and infiltration - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions – Right-of-Way •Landscaping features •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences www.EdinaMN.gov 12-C 10/26/2016 3 The CITYof EDINAWhat/Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically 60’ width •Property corners located during survey www.EdinaMN.gov 13-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Roadway •All curb and gutter will be replaced •New roadbed and pavement surface www.EdinaMN.gov 14-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced/installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy www.EdinaMN.gov 15-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Utilities •Localized watermain and service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •Localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Storm sewer upgrades •- Sump pump drain pipe installed where feasible www.EdinaMN.gov 16-A The CITYof EDINA •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Utility Ownership www.EdinaMN.gov 17-A Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Sump Services in ROW to be relocated to the property line if not connected •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connect permit available on City website www.EdinaMN.gov 18-C 10/26/2016 4 The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Sidewalks •Based on Sidewalk Facilities Map •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and routing conflicts www.EdinaMN.gov 19-A The CITYof EDINARoadway Classifications www.EdinaMN.gov 20-A The CITYof EDINAPrivate Utilities •City encourages private utility companies (gas, electric, telephone, and cable) to upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Potential City-required relocations •Goal is to streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance •Streetlight upgrades typically not included with project www.EdinaMN.gov 21-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Localized flooding during rainfall •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 22-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in yards •Construction equipment stored on streets •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) www.EdinaMN.gov 23-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 5 days to allow driveways to cure •Irrigation and pet fence systems most likely will be damaged www.EdinaMN.gov 24-A 10/26/2016 5 The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •-You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •- Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be seeded www.EdinaMN.gov 25-A The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •We will; •- Provide opportunities for input •- Keep you informed •- Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs www.EdinaMN.gov 26-C The CITYof EDINACity Utility Fund •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •- Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •- Sanitary sewer •-Watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 27-C The CITYof EDINAPedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •- Sidewalks •- Bike lanes •-Associated signage and pavement markings www.EdinaMN.gov 28-C The CITYof EDINADo Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •- Snowplowing •- Pothole repairs •- Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction www.EdinaMN.gov 29-C The CITYof EDINASpecial Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •4-1 Council vote to approve (required by State statute) •Cover 100% of roadway costs •- Roadway and driveway removals •- Subgrade materials •-Asphalt pavement •- Restoration www.EdinaMN.gov 30-C 10/26/2016 6 The CITYof EDINAResidential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •- Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties www.EdinaMN.gov 31-C ScenarioScenarioScenarioScenario Land UseLand UseLand UseLand Use ClassClassClassClass REU FactorREU FactorREU FactorREU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 B Multi-Family Residential 0.8 The CITYof EDINACorner Lot Assessments •Revised June 2016 •Example; •5845, 5844 assessed 1 REU in 2015 •5900, 5901 assessed 0.5 REU in 2015 •5900, 5901 assessed 0.5 REU in 2016 •Earlier policy will continue to apply to previously assessed properties (1/3-2/3 split) www.EdinaMN.gov 32-A 2015 Project 2016 Project The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Birchcrest A/Countryside B •224 properties •2.9 miles of road •32,273 square yards of street pavement •22 fire hydrants •60 sanitary manholes www.EdinaMN.gov 33-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Countryside G •60 properties •0.6 miles of road •9,028 square yards of street pavement •7 fire hydrants •18 sanitary manholes www.EdinaMN.gov 34-A The CITYof EDINAPreliminary Assessments *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) www.EdinaMN.gov 35-C Neighborhood Estimated Assessment Range per REU* # of REUs SquareYards of Paving Square Yards of Paving per REU Birchcrest A / Countryside B $14,400 - $19,900 214.96 32,273 150 Countryside G $11,200 - $15,000 53.12 9,028 170 The CITYof EDINAPayment Options •Final assessment amount will be sent one year after project completion (Fall 2018) •- Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance charges •- Pay 25%; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •- Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •- Defer payment if 65 years of age or older •Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •- Last year’s interest rate was 3.74% www.EdinaMN.gov 36-C 10/26/2016 7 The CITYof EDINACommunication www.EdinaMN.gov 37-A •Regular Mail -All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires - Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers -Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, paving, temporary inaccessibility) •City Website Project Page The CITYof EDINAProviding Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •-Traffic/pedestrian issues •- Street drainage issues •- Streetlight upgrades •- Sump pump connection options •Public hearings in November and December 2016 •- Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns www.EdinaMN.gov 38-A The CITYof EDINAQuestionnaire Results www.EdinaMN.gov 39-A Neighborhood Multi-Modal Surveys Returned Utility Surveys Returned Birchcrest A / Countryside B 12% (26 / 220) 50% (110 / 220) Countryside G 24% (13 / 54) 44% (24 / 54) Total Responses To Date 14% (39 / 274) 49% (134 / 274) The CITYof EDINACity Extra •Free, weekly email updates on project progress and schedules •Sign up on City website, www.EdinaMN.gov •- Check box next to your project name •Best way to stay informed •If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates upon request www.EdinaMN.gov 40-A The CITYof EDINAHow To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Sign up for City Extra •Ask questions, stay informed www.EdinaMN.gov 41-C The CITYof EDINAContact Us Email: mail@edinamn.gov Call: 952-826-0371 Visit: Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. www.EdinaMN.gov 42-C 10/26/2016 8 The CITYof EDINAQuestions? www.EdinaMN.gov 43-C Thanks for your time! 2017 ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING JULY 25th, 2016 NAME ADDRESS 1 L'. f 11 6'144 7 ...v't OL)-) lis 61 LIS c'z,d 0 k.)- ' ,S 'b (- 2 ; / ( ( / 3 vC ;4(1 ' i , , , - 6 i , . , 7 L. 8 11 POI,,, "k...v 1 iT 12 13 .„,. 14 15 17 18 i . 19 a _ . .. 20 21 _' 1 . 22 ba,,, , , 23 24 25 I . , cf, , (._. ( _ / ,/,,c- - , 26 .......A., .... 27 , 28 ,, /-7 ii," „6 z /6 7k2a 3 29 a®: ; , 30 ' --(f,t. t-t,- . / 2017 ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING JULY 25th, 2016 NAME ADDRESS 1 - - 2 1 3 ,, / , 1.- 4 ' / • 5 , 1 6 6L4an 0, to r -(9 91/0, [, 0-(14-• 3,_/' 7 8 9 - , 10 ff 11 12 ( , Piliu Mdb-ige (01z-1-1- Olt-v--sci. 12-A 13 14 15 16 •17 ' 18 / 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 çU LY l), ,b1.) 6 -/ Please sire your comments below: t/t, dyr1CL4 kDar ivAL e ILLY\1) (wfLf 2'1L 1kWiLNr`C.W-C-, Arr)i, Aj b ire- k--ILtAAK\ Optional: kX/3 ).YLLYYNAN-Y. ?-ed bun/ (ri_1()(1(?) *raf‘e.A,1 -4eLL Or; )6GCt.,A Name: Email: Optional: n Name: ••,. e Email: SUfaCts 1,‘ rke( Please share your comments below: CniAc e frk-QJ ez6o/cf-- t\A‘uc- s c:( o Ecj ( c3 tr, dcc 6.((? kiLAi Please share your comments below: C \\ -C.:31 3 v-4(2_,.. hraoa rc. ip sc°,koiv-stz-L-,/ Cw-c-zr ckv--;e3 kr\e___, \nclri4- CC)r rTY->,41-r0 e_e- Y6 Li Ctek2e ci) \e Optional: Name: 3)- Cz,u. S/ Mat Afnc-fnc'ick ,rs-v, '06 titeL(7, Email: cs_Jfil COI N'T C Please share your comments below: V LA v f i Y-2\'` `/-3e--"P CstAl C0)—,-L9 1(0— t71 - Optional:e Name: t LiSa Email: O., _ L t\eisbe, Q_uOkc-- c. APPENDIX J Correspondence from Residents 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Patrick Wrase Sent:Monday, October 13, 2014 12:34 PM To:Chad Millner Subject:FW: Olingher road FYI, it was Mike but the last name is unknown. Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 PWrase@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Wrase Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 11:23 AM To: 'mike@samsale.net' Cc: Chad Millner Subject: RE: Olingher road Hello Mike, Thanks for the email about the conditions of the street surface out on Olinger Rd. I have had a discussion with the streets superintendent about continued maintenance needs on Olinger Rd. Edina Public Works is planning to conduct more extensive maintenance work on Olinger Rd within the next few weeks. The maintenance will include pavement milling of the shoulders and placement of a thin bituminous pavement overlay along the curb lines. Also, because of the accelerated deterioration that has occurred on Olinger Rd, we are looking for an opportunity to move this street up in the Capital Improvement Plan schedule for total reconstruction. Initial indications are that Olinger Rd could be moved into the Capital Improvement Plan for reconstruction in 2017. Please let me know if you have any other questions or comments regarding Olinger Rd. Thanks Pat Patrick Wrase, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 PWrase@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business -----Original Message----- From: Mike [mailto:mike@samsale.net] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 10:30 AM To: Chad Millner Subject: Olingher road 2 Short of a resurfacing the road which is badly needed at least fix the pot holes (adjacent to entrance to grove cir) This is just waiting for a sprained or broken ankle. 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Shawn Anderson Sent:Monday, October 13, 2014 12:52 PM To:Chad Millner Subject:RE: 20141013 Olinger Road Talked to this gentlemen last week, did tell him that if the forecast holds out and it is very nice through Oct. and beginning of Nov. I just may get to his side of the street. I am still hopeful that that will happen, because I do agree it is in need of some work. I will do my best to get to his area this year yet. Thanks Shawn Shawn Anderson, Streets Supervisor 952-826-0313 | Fax 952-826-0392 SGAnderson@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Chad Millner Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 12:46 PM To: 'jdten20@yahoo.com' Cc: Brian Olson; Shawn Anderson; James Hovland (jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com); Scott H. Neal; Patrick Wrase Subject: 20141013 Olinger Road Dennis, Thanks for your comments shown below. I was copied on this email since I have been involved with the situation. You are not the only resident along Olinger Road that feels the condition of the road surface is bad. We met with another resident about this issue this summer. Based on those conversations two things occurred. 1. Public works would conduct some milling and patching operations in the worst locations to make the road passable for snow plowing operations. They would also continue to monitor the conditions and make the necessary corrections as needed. 2. The road was added to our local street reconstruction program for consideration in 2017. This would be full depth street reconstruction. We would also look at the condition of the buried utilities during that project. While we understand your desire for an immediate fix, budgets limit how many streets we can reconstruct in any given year. We try to reconstruct the areas with the highest needs considering pavement condition, utilities, traffic safety and pedestrian movements. Thanks again for your comments and if you would like to discuss our street reconstruction program in more detail, please give me a call, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392 cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business I have lived at 5705 Olinger Road for just shy of 46 years. You most likely do not know who I am because I am not in the habit of complaining or making demands. However, the time has come for a complaint. 2 No one who travels Olinger Road will dispute the fact that the surface of Olinger Road is in VERY sad shape. A month or so ago engineering told me that the surface was scheduled to be milled and a new surface applied. This past week the milling took place. Unfortunately, the milling only took place on a portion of the west side of the street. None of the east side of the street was milled. This is not because the east side is in any better condition than the west side was. No, both sides are/were in equally poor condition. I am told there is not funding nor time to do the entire street. I find this explanation unacceptable. Olinger Road is the route that City trucks use to haul tons and tons of snow every winter to snow "storage" at Bredesen. This is a lot of extra "City business" traffic on Olinger and a huge reason for the street's sorry state. I am hopeful that, upon further consideration, the funds and time can be found to mill and resurface ALL of Olinger Road. Best regards, Dennis Wegner 612-834-4245 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Melissa Mendez <mamendez@umn.edu> Sent:Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:24 PM To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Re: question about road construction Thank you Andrew This is extremely helpful! - Much appreciated :) Melissa Melissa Batalden Mendez, MSW, LICSW Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare School of Social Work - University of Minnesota 216 Peters Hall 1404 Gortner Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 mamendez@umn.edu cascw.umn.edu Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. "Every moment contains within it the seed of a miraculous new beginning." Marianne Williamson Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Image result for Gopher clip art Minnesota On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@edinamn.gov> wrote: Melissa, Here is the project timeline as of today; • July 18th or 25th 2016 – we will hold an informational meeting with all of the 2017 project areas to discuss more specific details about each construction project. At this time, we will have an estimated range of assessments specific to each project. This presentation will be added to our website a few weeks after the meeting. (http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=countryside_g). • December 2016 – we will present our engineering study and cost estimate at a special City Council meeting, and residents will be able to give feedback on the project directly to Council. We anticipate Council will approve the project 2 at this meeting. Once the project is approved by Council, the assessments will be pending for all of the affected properties. No payment will be necessary at this time. • December 2016 to March 2017 – engineering staff will be finalizing construction plans and bidding the project. • April/May 2017 – construction will begin, weather-permitting. We will have an on-site kick-off meeting sometime in the spring to discuss the project with residents and answer any questions. • October/November 2017 – construction concludes, weather-permitting. • Spring 2018 – the contractor will come back to perform minor touch-up work and any other outstanding items that have not been completed to the satisfaction of the inspector. • Fall 2018 (typically October or November) – the final assessment hearing will be held, at which point staff will present the final project costs and Council will order the assessments be levied to the affected properties. Staff will then certify the assessments to Hennepin County. The City has 4 assessment repayment options; 1. Pay the entire assessment amount prior to certification 2. Pay a minimum of 25% of the assessment amount prior to certification and the remainder over a 15- year period 3. Pay the entire assessment amount over a 15-year period 4. Defer the assessment to your property if you are 65 years of age or older. The assessment will continue to accumulate interest during this deferment. If you have further questions about paying back the assessment, please contact our Assessing Department at 952-826- 0365. Based on your situation, you shouldn’t have to worry about paying for the assessment until well after you’ve returned. The main items that you will miss during your trip are our meeting this summer, the public hearing in December, and the kick-off meeting in the spring. Most likely, construction will already be underway when you return. That being said, I would suggest checking our website occasionally checking our website for project updates. You can also certainly email or call me for updates, particularly around late July and early December when we will have a better idea of project costs. At this time, we are still evaluating the infrastructure to determine the full scope of the project. One thing I feel I should mention is this project will include installing a sidewalk on Olinger Road between Vernon Avenue and Olinger Boulevard per our Sidewalk Facilities map (http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Engineering/Transportation/Living%20Streets/Sidewalk_Facilities_Co mpPlan_Final.pdf). 3 If you have any other questions or comments, feel free to get in touch with me. You can refer your renters to me, as well, if they have more specific questions. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Melissa Mendez [mailto:mamendez@umn.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 8:37 PM To: Andrew Scipioni Cc: Joaquin Mendez Subject: Re: question about road construction Hello again Andrew- Who could we contact at the City offices regarding setting up payments for the upcoming 2017 construction. Again, we are moving out of the country for one year (July 2016-July 2017) and want to get things set (payments, timeframe, etc) prior to our departure. Thanks so much for your help! warmly, Melissa Melissa Batalden Mendez, MSW, LICSW Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare School of Social Work - University of Minnesota 216 Peters Hall 1404 Gortner Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 mamendez@umn.edu 4 cascw.umn.edu Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. "Every moment contains within it the seed of a miraculous new beginning." Marianne Williamson Right-click here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Image result for Gopher clip art Minnesota On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@edinamn.gov> wrote: Melissa, Construction will likely begin April or May of 2017, and conclude by September or October. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952 826 0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Melissa Mendez [mailto:mamendez@umn.edu] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 4:58 PM To: Andrew Scipioni; Joaquin Mendez Subject: Re: question about road construction Thanks Andrew- 5 In the meantime, do you have a ballpark timing estimate that you could give us? (when construction would begin and potentially run through?) We are needing to transfer locations due to work for 1 year and want to give accurate/updated info to the family that will be renting our home. Any info you can provide at this time would be appreciated. thanks! Melissa Melissa Batalden Mendez, MSW, LICSW Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare School of Social Work - University of Minnesota 216 Peters Hall 1404 Gortner Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 mamendez@umn.edu cascw.umn.edu "Every moment contains within it the seed of a miraculous new beginning." Marianne Williamson On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@edinamn.gov> wrote: Melissa, 6 We are still in the process of updating this map. However, the neighborhoods scheduled for reconstruction in 2017 (red) are accurate. This would include your street, located within the Countryside G project area. We are planning to hold an informational meeting sometime this summer with all of the properties affected by our 2017 construction. When the date has been set, you will receive a letter from us with more information. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952 826 0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Melissa Mendez [mailto:mamendez@umn.edu] Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 2:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: question about road construction Hello :) Could you confirm the latest schedule for the road construction in our neighborhood? The latest version we can find on-line is from June 2015, but believe the dates have been pushed back? http://edinamn.gov/edinafiles/files/City_Offices/Engineering/Street_Recon_Final_2015.pdf Our address is: 6024 Berne Circle Edina, MN 55436 thanks! Melissa and Joaquin 7 Melissa Batalden Mendez, MSW, LICSW Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare School of Social Work - University of Minnesota 216 Peters Hall 1404 Gortner Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 mamendez@umn.edu cascw.umn.edu "Every moment contains within it the seed of a miraculous new beginning." Marianne Williamson 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Carter Schulze Sent:Tuesday, July 26, 2016 12:20 PM To:'Ken Rush'; Andrew Scipioni Subject:RE: Countryside G Street Reconstruction Ken, Thank you for coming to the Informational Meeting last night and providing your feedback. To answer your question about preventing the sidewalk construction, a petition would need to be signed by the residents adjacent to the proposed sidewalk and that petition would need to be accepted by the City Council. If the petition were to be accepted, the Council would look to Engineering for feedback and recommendations and I believe the sidewalk would still be recommended with the understanding that we would protect and preserve the trees and character of the road the best that we can. Petitions can be found on our city’s website if desired. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Ken Rush [mailto:k.rusher@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 9:58 PM To: Carter Schulze; Andrew Scipioni Subject: Countryside G Street Reconstruction Carter, Thank you for the presentation on the Countryside G Street Reconstruction presentation tonight. My wife and I are long-term residents of Edina. I have lived on Olinger Road for 69 years out of the past 71 years. We firmly believe there is no need for a sidewalk on our street for several reasons. We believe that it will actually increase the likelihood of motor vehicle/pedestrian accidents by encouraging individuals, families and children to cross a major County Road (Vernon Avenue) at the uncontrolled intersection of Olinger Road and Vernon Avenue. Traffic counts on Vernon can be extremely high at times and speeds often exceed the posted limit of 40 mph. Olinger Road was one of the City of Edina's earliest roads. It was inhabited by farmers and others who earned a living for their families by working with their hands and provided them with the rural atmosphere they were accustomed to. We ourselves enjoy much of that same atmosphere. We believe the inclusion of a sidewalk on our street would diminish the suburban feeling we currently enjoy. We do not live in the inner city and we do not want to add this element that will make our neighborhood appear as such. We feel safe on our road whether walking or driving. The present level of pedestrians, bicyclists and automobiles currently share the roadway amicably. There are many mature trees and plantings that would be disturbed by the inclusion of a sidewalk alongside Olinger Road. This mature growth adds to the suburban character of our neighborhood and provides habitat for 2 various birds and animals. We like the feeling of being a part of nature and fear that a sidewalk will take away from that feeling. How do we go about preventing a sidewalk from being constructed on Olinger Road? Respectfully, Ken and Twyla Rush 5801 Olinger Road Edina Ken APPENDIX K Preliminary Assessment Roll COUNTRYSIDE G NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-443 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PID Owner House No.Street Assessable REU Assessable Amount 1 32-117-21-31-0041 Kirk Swenson & Kristin Swenson 5924 Amy Dr 0 -$ 2 32-117-21-23-0214 Timothy J Poehling, Tte & Kristin M Poehling, Tte 6000 Berne Cir 0.8 11,812.80$ 3 32-117-21-23-0215 Timothy J Poehling, Tte & Kristin M Poehling, Tte 6004 Berne Cir 0.8 11,812.80$ 4 32-117-21-23-0212 Donald F Kasbohm & Marietta C Kasbohm 6008 Berne Cir 0.8 11,812.80$ 5 32-117-21-23-0213 Donald F Kasbohm & Marietta C Kasbohm 6012 Berne Cir 0.8 11,812.80$ 6 32-117-21-23-0219 Jeanne Bailey 6016 Berne Cir 0.8 11,812.80$ 7 32-117-21-23-0220 Michael H Samuels & Mary L Samuels 6020 Berne Cir 0.8 11,812.80$ 8 32-117-21-23-0105 Joaquin Mendez & Melissa Mendez 6024 Berne Cir 1 14,766.00$ 9 32-117-21-23-0106 John S Svenningsen & Amelia Q Svenningsen 6028 Berne Cir 1 14,766.00$ 10 32-117-21-23-0107 John R Rieger & Ildiko Rieger 6032 Berne Cir 1 14,766.00$ 11 32-117-21-23-0108 Anthony E Kamp 6036 Berne Cir 1 14,766.00$ 12 32-117-21-23-0099 David E Bremer & Tianyi S Bremer 6008 Grove Cir 1 14,766.00$ 13 32-117-21-23-0100 Roy Reynolds Jr & Wendy W Reynolds 6012 Grove Cir 1 14,766.00$ 14 32-117-21-23-0101 Feng Wang 6016 Grove Cir 1 14,766.00$ 15 32-117-21-32-0032 Gale E Brothers & Judith A Brothers 6020 Grove Cir 1 14,766.00$ 16 32-117-21-32-0031 Charles C Tabor & Julie A Tonsager Tabor 6024 Grove Cir 1 14,766.00$ 17 32-117-21-31-0026 Michael & Diana Lynch 5936 Grove St 0 -$ 18 32-117-21-31-0075 Erik & Elizabeth Jensen 5916 Olinger Blvd 0.5 7,383.00$ 19 32-117-21-24-0100 Leo M Evans Jr 5703 Olinger Rd 0.5 7,383.00$ 20 32-117-21-24-0101 Leo M Evans Jr 5701 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 21 32-117-21-24-0005 Dennis E Wegner 5705 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 22 32-117-21-24-0025 Nancy M O'Connor & Thomas D Maines 5709 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 23 32-117-21-24-0024 Roy C Hagen 5717 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 24 32-117-21-23-0033 Carolyn J Hagen 5720 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 25 32-117-21-24-0022 James W Lindstrom & Jane B Lindstrom 5721 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 26 32-117-21-24-0023 David W Simons & Amanda Jo Kimmet 5725 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 27 32-117-21-31-0027 Kenneth M Rush & Twyla Rush 5801 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 28 32-117-21-32-0051 Rodney A Young & Carla E Young 5804 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 29 32-117-21-32-0052 Guy R P Logan & Suzanne L Logan 5806 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 30 32-117-21-32-0006 Steven R Jensen & Robbin B Jensen 5808 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 31 32-117-21-32-0007 George Tjaden 5812 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 32 32-117-21-31-0001 Richard W Jahnke & Lisa C Jahnke 5813 Olinger Rd 0.66 9,745.56$ 33 32-117-21-32-0008 Tonu Lang & Virginia A Lang 5816 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 34 32-117-21-31-0040 Dawn Mcpherson 5817 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 35 32-117-21-32-0012 Timothy R Balfany & Jana K Balfany 5824 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 36 32-117-21-31-0002 James A Tabor & Carolyn A Tabor 5829 Olinger Rd 0.66 9,745.56$ 37 32-117-21-31-0022 Ward B Wheeler & Darlene G Wheeler 5901 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 38 32-117-21-32-0027 Laurie A Eckberg & Dennis Eckberg 5902 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 39 32-117-21-32-0028 James A Sletten & Jane T Sletten 5906 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 40 32-117-21-32-0029 Alan Benson & Xiaoyu Gu 5910 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 41 32-117-21-32-0030 Andrew W Leddick & Rebecca L Leddick 5914 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 42 32-117-21-31-0023 Karen Ostman & Clarice Ostman 5917 Olinger Rd 1 14,766.00$ 43 32-117-21-32-0044 Richard J Holetz & Karen Lee Holetz 6100 Sherman Cir 0.5 7,383.00$ 44 32-117-21-32-0049 Scott R Hamilton & Angela A Hamilton 6101 Sherman Cir 0.5 7,383.00$ 45 32-117-21-32-0043 Edward Griffin & Jane B Griffin 6104 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 46 32-117-21-32-0042 Aaron F Love & Kristin D Love 6108 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 47 32-117-21-32-0048 Brian P Halliday & Cynthia A Brucato 6109 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 48 32-117-21-32-0041 Jane M Carpenter 6112 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 49 32-117-21-32-0040 Justin M Miller & Laura M Miller 6116 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 50 32-117-21-32-0047 Colette M Ehlers & John M Ehlers 6117 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 51 32-117-21-32-0039 Steven N Gilfix & Jeanne E Gilfix 6120 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 52 32-117-21-32-0038 Mark S Saxton & Jenny E Saxton 6124 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 53 32-117-21-32-0046 Young Hwan Ha & Yina Ha 6125 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 54 32-117-21-32-0037 Kristina M Morton & Patrick E Morton 6128 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 55 32-117-21-32-0045 Vibha Kurdikar & Devdatt Kurdikar 6129 Sherman Cir 0.5 7,383.00$ 56 32-117-21-32-0036 Raymond L Drew & Barbara J Drew 6132 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 57 32-117-21-32-0033 Anne M Schulze 6133 Sherman Cir 0.5 7,383.00$ 58 32-117-21-23-0119 Dean C Sanberg & Kathleen H Sanberg 6136 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 59 32-117-21-32-0034 Frank Z Murray 6137 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ 60 32-117-21-32-0035 Kenneth E Wanner & Ivalea Wanner 6141 Sherman Cir 1 14,766.00$ Total 53.12 784,370.00$ The CITY of EDINA Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Improvements BA-439 Public Improvement Hearing November 15, 2016 The CITY of EDINA Project Details •Initiated as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program •9 properties •Dead End •Gravel Road •2 Gravel Alleys •1 Minneapolis fire hydrant •Adjacent to Minnehaha Creek www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA Project Stakeholders www.EdinaMN.gov 3 City of Edina City of Minneapolis Minneapolis Park Board MnDNR H e n n e p i n C o u n t y The CITY of EDINA Project Nomenclature •W 54th Street •York-Zenith Alley •York Avenue Alley www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA Existing Roadway Details •Public Works temporarily paved a portion of W 54th St. in 2014 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA Existing Roadway Details •W 54th St. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 •York Avenue Alley •York-Zenith Alley The CITY of EDINA Existing Roadway Details www.EdinaMN.gov 7 •York Avenue to York Avenue Alley The CITY of EDINA Proposed Roadway Improvements •Recycle existing pavement and gravel section where feasible and construct new street •Install curb on W 54th St. www.EdinaMN.gov 8 The CITY of EDINA Proposed Alley Improvements •Recycle gravel where feasible •Relocate into ROW •Pave Alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Xerxes-York Alley 2014 The CITY of EDINA Existing Storm Sewer Details •This area is not identified by the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan •Localized surface drainage issues, verified by resident comments •Direct point sources to Creek www.EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of EDINA Existing Storm Sewer Details www.EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY of EDINA Proposed Storm Water Improvements www.EdinaMN.gov 12 •Replace Pipes with biofiltration basin and rip rap outfall The CITY of EDINA Proposed Storm Water Improvements www.EdinaMN.gov 13 The CITY of EDINA Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements www.EdinaMN.gov 14 •Green Infrastructure Stormwater Cost Sharing Grant •- Water Quality Improvement •- Education and Outreach •Citizens Advisory Approved 50% Cost Share ($15,900) •Next Step is Board Approval December 8, 2016 The CITY of EDINA Existing Water Main Details www.EdinaMN.gov 15 •Existing Minneapolis Hydrant •Existing Minneapolis 48” Water Main •Mix of Edina and Minneapolis Water supply The CITY of EDINA Estimated Project Cost www.EdinaMN.gov 16 Item Total Costs1 West 54th Street2: $ 72,995 York Ave Alley Total2: $14,040 York-Zenith Alley Total2: $10,400 Utilities: Sanitary Sewer $ 12,790 Watermain $ 0 Storm Sewer 3 $ 76,930 Total Project: $187,155 1 Cost shown in estimated 2017 dollars 2 Cost to be assessed to benefitting residents 3 Includes curb and gutter and storm treatment costs The CITY of EDINA Project Nomenclature •W 54th Street •York-Zenith Alley •York Avenue Alley www.EdinaMN.gov 17 The CITY of EDINA Proposed W 54th St Assessments www.EdinaMN.gov 18 •Based on Residential Equivalent Units (REU) •1 single family home = 1 REU •Estimated assessment per REU = $11,230 •Final assessments are calculated after final construction costs are determined The CITY of EDINA Proposed York Ave Alley Assessments www.EdinaMN.gov 19 •Based on Residential Equivalent Units (REU) •1 single family home = 1 REU •Estimated assessment per REU = $2,340 •Final assessments are calculated after final construction costs are determined The CITY of EDINA Proposed York-Zenith Alley Assessments www.EdinaMN.gov 20 •Based on Residential Equivalent Units (REU) •1 single family home = 1 REU •Estimated assessment per REU = $2,600 •Final assessments are calculated after final construction costs are determined The CITY of EDINA Project Schedule www.EdinaMN.gov 21 Project Open House September 28, 2015 Project Workshop August 15, 2016 ETC Engineering Study Review September 15, 2016 Receive Engineering Report November 1, 2016 Public Hearing November 15, 2016 Bid Opening March/April 2017 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2017 Complete Construction Summer 2017 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2018 The CITY of EDINA Project Recommendations www.EdinaMN.gov 22 •Feasibility: Staff believes the project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Chowen Park D Neighborhood •Authorize: Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, BA-439 The CITY of EDINA Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 23 Thanks for your time! Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Carter A. Schulze, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Item Activity: Subject:Public Hearing: Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-439, Resolution No. 2016-115 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council determines the project to be necessary, cost-effective and feasible, Council shall adopt Resolution No. 2016-115, accepting the engineering study and approving Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA-439, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. INTRODUCTION: City staff initiated this project. The project reconstructs West 54th Street from Xerxes Avenue to where it dead- ends. It involves paving the gravel road to 22 feet wide, adding curb and gutter, one-sided parking, paving the York Avenue and York-Zenith alleys, minor utility upgrades, etc. The overall project cost is estimated at $187,155. Funding will be a combination of special assessments and City Utility funds. Staff has had discussions with the City of Minneapolis and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for cost sharing of up to $30,000. If this occurs, the 54th Street assessment amount would be reduced by 30-40%. Staff has analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2016-115 Engineering Study Kathy Iverson Submittal 11-15-2016 Engineering Presentation 11-15-2016 RESOLUTION NO. 2016-115 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR CHOWEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-439 WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 18th day of October, 2016, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA-439, the proposed improvement of Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 15th day of November, 2016, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: November 15, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Special Meeting of November 15, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Special Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 20___. _______________________________ City Clerk ENGINEERING STUDY CHOWEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS West 54th Street IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-439 November 1, 2016 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this feasibility study was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 44908 11-01-16 Carter Schulze Reg. No. Date 2 ENGINEERING STUDY – BA-439 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA CHOWEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS NOVEMBER 1, 2016 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstructing one of the last gravel streets in the City. Improvements include the installation of concrete curb and gutter, new bituminous pavement, and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $187,155. The estimated roadway improvement cost is $72,995 and will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $11,230 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Alley improvements amount to $24,440 and will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $2,340-$2,600 per REU. Utility improvements amount to $89,720 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. The project can be completed during the 2017 construction season. Staff believes the project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to improve the infrastructure, and complies with Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure,” as well as the City’s Living Streets Policy. LOCATION: The project includes West 54th Street within the Cities of Edina and Minneapolis. A detailed location map of the Chowen Park D project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 3 INITIATION: The Chowen Park D Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition and stormwater drainage. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadway The street in this neighborhood was originally constructed between 1938 and 1956 (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Chowen Park D neighborhood, 1956 The street within this neighborhood is half bituminous pavement, half gravel surface, and does not have concrete curb and gutter. In 2014, the City overlayed approximately half of the roadway with bituminous as a temporary erosion control measure. The average roadway width is 22’. A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area showed the top two feet of roadway to be made up of a silty-sand/gravel mix. The roadway is in relatively poor condition and in need of repetitive maintenance. Examples of the current street condition can be seen in Photos 2 and 3. Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 4 Photo 2: Existing Roadway Condition Photo 3: Existing Roadway Condition As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 0 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc.). The average PCI for the City of Edina is 61 and the average PCI for Chowen Park D is 0. Alleys There are three alleys immediately adjacent to the Chowen Park D project area, as shown in Figure 2. Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 5 Figure 2: Chowen Park D Alleys They include, from east to west; • Xerxes-York alley, extending from West 54th Street to West 55th Street, 25 adjacent properties. This alley is located within a 14’ right-of-way between Xerxes Avenue and York Avenue. • York Avenue alley, extending from West 54th Street to 200’ south, 6 adjacent properties. This alley is partially located within the 60’ right-of-way for York Avenue and partially on private property. • York-Zenith alley, extending from West 54th Street to 140’ south, 4 adjacent properties. This alley is partially located within the 14’ right-of-way between York Avenue and Minnehaha Creek and partially on private property. The alleys vary in width from 8’-14’. The Xerxes-York alley was overlayed by the City in 2014, after receiving a petition from adjacent property owners. The York Avenue and York-Zenith alleys are currently gravel surfaces. The Xerxes-York and York Avenue alleys are currently maintained by the City (including snow plowing); the York-Zenith alley is not. Traffic and Crash Data Given the location and context of this project, staff has not measured traffic volumes or speeds. It is assumed that volumes and speeds on West 54th Street are comparable to most local streets in the City (500 vehicles per day, 85% percentile speeds 30 miles per hour). Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 6 Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system consists of 24” vitrified clay pipe (VCP) installed in 1939. In 2014, the City rehabilitated the sewer pipes using a cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) liner. Historical records indicate there have been few sewer back- ups or blockages in the area (see Appendix A). Watermain Three properties (5400 and 5402 Xerxes Avenue and 3113 West 54th Street) are served from an 8” watermain on Xerxes Avenue owned by the City of Minneapolis. The City of Minneapolis also owns and maintains a 48” steel watermain and fire hydrant along the north edge of West 54th Street. Construction records indicate the 48” watermain was cleaned and lined in 1960. Three properties (5400, 5404, and 5408 York Avenue) are served from a 1.5” copper pipe extending north from York Avenue. 5410 York Avenue is connected to a 6” cast iron pipe (CIP) watermain installed in 1971. 5411 Zenith Avenue utilizes a private well and does not have a water service. Storm Sewer This project is located within the legal boundary of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). The system consists of a 12” corrugated metal pipe (CMP) and an 8” CIP which divert roadway and alley runoff directly into Minnehaha Creek along the north edge West 54th Street. Runoff from the York Avenue alley and neighboring parcels collects in a land-locked, wooded area located within the York Avenue right-of-way. Multi-Modal Transportation Sidewalk Facilities There are no sidewalks within the project area; however, there are sidewalks on Xerxes Avenue between West 56th Street and West 54th Street (see Appendix B). Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities on West 54th Street or on Xerxes Avenue immediately adjacent to the project area (see Appendix C). Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications, and cable utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are a combination of overheard and underground facilities located in backyards or along the boulevards. Street lighting consists of standard “cobra head” lights mounted on wood poles located throughout the project area as shown in Appendix D. DESIGN INPUT: Staff All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update (the “Plan”), the Living Streets Policy, the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan, and sustainable project evaluation. Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 7 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Chapter 7 of the Plan addresses locations of proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities within the City. As shown in Appendix B, there are no proposed sidewalk facilities within the project area. Appendix C shows West 54th Street and Xerxes Avenue adjacent to the project area are approved secondary bicycle routes. Living Streets Policy The Living Streets Plan was adopted by the City Council on May 6th, 2015 (see Appendix E). The vision statement of the Living Streets Policy expresses the need to look at future projects differently: Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Staff has included elements that pertain to residential neighborhoods in the rehabilitation of the infrastructure and replacement of the roadways. Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan As the stormwater in this area ultimately discharges into the City of Minneapolis, the Chowen Park D project area is not included in the CWRMP. Portions of this project area are located within the 100-year flood plain, as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: Excerpt from FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Sustainability Staff has also included elements of sustainable engineering into this project. Sustainability in engineering means delivering our services in a manner that ensures an appropriate balance between the environment, the community, and available funding. This is essentially the “Triple Bottom Line” of sustainability; Equity, Environment, and Economy. Staff views sustainability Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 8 as maximizing our resources, creating lasting environments, and improving and shaping our community so that future generations are not burdened by the decisions of today. The project was evaluated based on the following key indicators to look for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and risks. • Equity: How well does the project provide or maintain core city services such as transportation, sanitation, clean water, emergency access, and emergency service? How does the project influence the well-being of the community? • Environment: How does the project influence the natural environment, such as surface or ground water health, forest canopy, natural resource diversity, wildlife habitat, air quality, noise, and others? • Economy: How does the project influence the local economy? What are the short term and long term costs? Is the continued service worth the price? The following is a summary of this evaluation: Equity: The project maintains access and mobility to the transportation network. Where available, this includes transportation options for a variety of user groups including, but not limited to, children, seniors, and disabled individuals. In addition, the project improves mobility for different types of users, such as pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Environment: The project provides pretreatment of stormwater runoff prior to entering Minnehaha Creek. Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work, thus protecting the existing natural environment. Bituminous pavements and in-place gravel will be recycled on-site, minimizing truck traffic to and from the site. Economy: The project is designed to reduce construction costs now and into the future. The new roadway section can easily be maintained long-term with the use of proactive sealcoating and mill and overlays. These maintenance operations will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works department. They had no comments on the study; however, Engineering and Public Works collaborated in developing the proposed improvements, understanding the City’s current snowplowing and snow storage practices and street maintenance objectives. Police/Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire departments. They recommended additional No Parking signage near corners and restricted turn-around locations. They also suggested that hydrant locations should be determined with snow storage practices in mind. Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 9 Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on September 15, 2016, the draft Chowen Park D Engineering Study was provided for review. Relevant minutes from the ETC meeting are included in Appendix F. Residents As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3 years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to an open house on September 28th, 2015. Materials from this meeting are available on the City’s website, or upon request. A project workshop was held on August 15th, 2016 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was attended by eleven residents representing eight properties. Materials from this meeting can be found in Appendix G. Resident input regarding the project was also received in the form of emails, which can be found in Appendix H. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: Roadway Typical Section The bituminous and gravel roadway sections are proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. The existing pavement and suitable aggregate material will be recycled for use as base material in the new roadway where feasible. A minimum of 8” of recycled gravel material will be graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous base and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. West 54th Street is designated as a Local Street in the Living Streets Plan. While the standard design width for this classification is 28’ (measured from the back of curb to the back of curb), staff is recommending a 22’ roadway section to address resident concerns about non-local traffic. This reduced section would also minimize construction impacts and better suit the context of this neighborhood. Pavement Maintenance The reconstructed section will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. With proactive maintenance procedures, including sealcoating and overlays, the design life of the entire roadway can be extended considerably. Parking Per the Living Streets Plan, on-street parking should be evaluated based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand, and construction and maintenance costs. As a Local Street, West 54th Street is permitted one- sided, two-sided, or no on-street parking. As the majority of the land use in this neighborhood is residential, and given the existing demand for parking, staff believes that one-sided parking along the north side of the street is Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 10 appropriate. The 22’ design width does not allow for two-sided parking to be implemented in the future. Roadway Signage All street signs, including street name blades, within the project area will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix D). All new signs shall conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Alleys Residents adjacent to the York Avenue alley expressed a desire for the City to continue to maintain this alley. To improve maintenance operations, staff is proposing to relocate the alley entirely within the existing ROW and install bituminous pavement. Minor drainage improvements will be completed by grade adjustments of the pavement. Residents adjacent to the York-Zenith alley expressed a desire to continue to maintain the alley themselves, but would like it paved. Staff is proposing to install bituminous pavement and continue to defer maintenance to the residents. Residents may petition the City to maintain this alley in the future; however, this would require an easement on 5400 and 5406 York Avenue. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer in this neighborhood has been televised and verified to be in good condition. The manhole castings will be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain Due to spatial limitations for construction equipment, staff is proposing to leave the existing copper pipe underneath the York Avenue alley that serves 5400, 5406, and 5408 York Avenue. The existing Minneapolis hydrant will also remain in place, but will be situated behind the new curb and gutter to protect it from snowplowing operations. Watermain improvements may be implemented in the future, if desired by the City of Minneapolis. Storm Sewer New concrete curb and gutter will be installed along the north side of West 54th Street, providing a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater runoff. A 6” wide, Design V modified curb (or ribbon curb) will be installed along the south side of the roadway at the same elevation as the pavement. This curb allows the roadway to maintain some of its current rural feel, while also protecting the edge of the new pavement. Figure 4 shows the proposed roadway section for West 54th Street. Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 11 Figure 4: Proposed Roadway Section The entire roadway will be graded to direct stormwater runoff into a biofiltration basin behind the curb on the north side of West 54th Street. This system will replace the existing pipes and serve to treat runoff prior to entering Minnehaha Creek. Staff is working with MCWD, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), and other necessary agencies to finalize the design of this system. The City has also applied for a grant from MCWD to fund a portion of these storm sewer improvements. Multi-Modal Transportation Sidewalk Facilities There are no proposed sidewalks with the project area. All pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Bicycle Facilities There are no proposed bicycle facilities with the project area. Private Utilities Staff met with representatives of several private utility companies on September 7th, 2016 to notify them of the proposed 2017 reconstruction projects and discuss preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections; therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting. The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works, and other City staff. RIGHT-OF-WAY & EASEMENTS: A 66’ right-of-way exists along West 54th Street. Half of this ROW is located within the City of Edina and half is located within the City of Minneapolis. Staff is preparing cooperative agreements with the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Park Board for proposed work that occurs within Minneapolis ROW and Park Board properties. These cooperative agreements will detail each agency’s responsibilities regarding construction, cost allocation, ownership, and future maintenance. Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 12 A ROW permit from Hennepin County will be required for work that will occur along Xerxes Avenue. A 60’ ROW exists along York Avenue. Two 14’ ROWs exist along the Xerxes- York alley and the York-Zenith alley. Temporary construction easements may be required for work that occurs within these alleys. Some properties have vegetation, boulders, retaining walls, or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary work. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $187,155 (see Table 1). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical, and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. The estimated roadway and alley construction costs are $72,995 and $24,440, respectively, and will be funded by special assessments. Utility improvements amount to $89,720 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Item Amount Total Cost Roadway Total: $ 72,995 York Ave Alley Total: $ 14,040 York-Zenith Alley Total: $ 10,400 Storm Sewer $ 76,930 Watermain $ - Sanitary Sewer $ 12,790 Utility Total: $ 89,720 Project Total: $ 187,155 Table 1: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statutes. Roadway Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 6.5 residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Chowen Park D project area, as shown in Appendix I. The estimated assessment per REU is $11,230 (see Figure 5). Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 13 Figure 5: Preliminary Roadway Assessment Map The formulas for calculating REUs are described below: Single-Family Residential Corner Lots 5400 and 5402 Xerxes Ave; = 0.5 REU (partial access off Xerxes Ave) 5410 York Ave; = 0.5 REU (partial access off York Ave) Undevelopable Lots 5401, 5405, and 5409 Zenith Ave; = 0 REU (proximity to Minnehaha Creek, located within 100-year floodplain, property owner will be assessed 1 REU for 5411 Zenith Ave) PID 2002824210027; = 0 REU (one single-family home built on two lots, property owner will be assessed 1 REU for adjacent 3113 W 54th St) All other properties are single-family residential located entirely within the project area and will be subjected to an assessment of 1 REU. Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 14 York Avenue Alley Historically, the City has assessed all properties abutting an alley improvement project, regardless of whether they currently access the alley. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 6 REUs adjacent to this alley, as shown in Appendix I. The estimated assessment per REU is $2,340 (see Figure 6). Figure 6: Preliminary York Avenue Alley Assessment Map York-Zenith Alley Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 4 REUs adjacent to this alley, as shown in Appendix I. The estimated assessment per REU is $2,600 (see Figure 7). Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 15 Figure 7: Preliminary York-Zenith Alley Assessment Map PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: FEASIBILITY: Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Chowen Park D Neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks B. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Sidewalk Facilities Map Project Open House 2015 September 28th, 2015 Project Workshop August 15th, 2016 ETC Engineering Study Review September 15th, 2016 Receive Engineering Study November 1st, 2016 Public Hearing November 15th, 2016 Bid Opening March/April 2017 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2017 Complete Construction Summer 2017 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2018 Engineering Study Chowen Park D Neighborhood Improvements BA-439 November 1, 2016 16 C. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map D. Streetlights and Signs E. Living Streets Policy F. ETC Meeting Minutes G. Project Workshop Materials H. Correspondence from Residents I. Preliminary Assessment Roll APPENDIX A Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks 5440 5428 5420 5411 5405 5412 5425 5410 5406 5406 5400 5420 5432 5412 5416 5424 5444 5421 5436 5433 54485437 5408 5417 5411 5413 3113 54025400 PROJECT LIMITS XE R X E S A V E YO R K A V E YO R K - Z E N I T H A L L E Y W 54TH STCity of Minneapolis City of Edina York Park YO R K A V E A L L E Y XE R X E S - Y O R K A L L E Y / Engineering DeptOctober 2016 Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksChowen Park D NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-439C I T Y O F E D I N A MI N N E S O T A INCORPORAT E D 1888 , e Sewer Blocks Watermain Breaks APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Sidewalk Facilities Map ¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñBrae mar Golf C ourse Bredese n Park Rosland Par k Pame la Par k Lewis Par k Highlands Park Walnut Ridge Park Todd Par k Gar de n Park Heights Park Van Valke nburg Park Fr ed R ichards G olf Cours e Cree k Valle y Par k Lake Edina Park Krahl Hill Nor mandale Park We be r Field Park Arneson Ac res Park Countryside Park Alde n Par k Utley Park Yorktow n Park Wooddale Park Arden Park York Park Cor ne lia Park Str achaue r Par k Fox MeadowPark Edinborough Park Koje tinPark Mc GuirePark Bir chcre stPark Sher woodPark Me lody LakePark Williams Par k ChowenPark St. John'sPark TingdalePark Brow ndalePark GrandviewSquare Fr ankTupa Par k Courtney Fie lds ?ÞA@ ?úA@+¡ ?úA@ ?ÞA@ +¡ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirr o r L a k e Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Mel o d y L a k e LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Ce n t e n n i a l L a k e Minneha h a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine Mile C r e e k Can a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St PetersLutheran School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance PublicLibrary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool HighlandSchool EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace School SouthviewMiddleSchool CountrysideSchool Valley ViewMiddle School Creek Valley School NormandaleElementary EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessor CalvinChristianSchool FireStation BL A K E R D SC H A E F E R R D VERNO N A V E FR A N C E A V E S XE R X E S A V E S CA H I L L R D 70T H ST W 66T H ST W YO R K A V E S INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44T H S T W 50T H S T W 54T H ST W 58T H ST W GL E A S O N R D 70T H ST W 76T H ST W DEWE Y HILL RD VALLEY V I E W R D VALLEY VIE W RD MINNESOT A D R 78T H ST W / Engineering Dept October 2016 Legend Existing Sidewalk City of EdinaSidewalk Facilities Future Active Routes To School Sidewalk Future State-Aid Sidewalk Future City Sidewalk Future Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map æ ¹» ¹» æ æ æ æ æ¹»æ æ ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹»æ æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ ¹º æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ æ ñ æ ¹º ñ æ ñ ?ÞA@ )y ?úA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mir r o r L a k e Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Me l o d y L a k e LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Ce n t e n n i a l L a k e AldenPark VanValkenburgPark FoxMeadowPark HighlandsPark Todd Park Weber FieldPark KojetinPark BrowndalePark WooddaleParkWilliamsParkUtleyPark FrankTupaPark SherwoodPark ArdenPark YorkPark ChowenPark PamelaParkSt JohnsPark StrachauerPark RoslandPark BristolParkCorneliaPark ArnesonAcresPark LakeEdinaParkFred RichardsGolf Course YorktownPark EdinboroughPark GardenPark MelodyLakePark TingdalePark CountrysidePark BredesenPark WalnutRidgePark KrahlHill Creek Valley Park HeightsPark NormandalePark McGuirePark LewisParkBraemar Park and Golf Course(Courtney Fields) Minnehah a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine Mile C r e e k Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St Peters Lutheran Church & School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance CalvaryChurchPublicLibrary ConcordSchool EdinaCovenant CorneliaSchool ColonialChurch HighlandSchool CalvaryLutheran EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace Church& School SouthviewJr High CrossviewLutheran CountrysideSchool St Albans Episcopal Valley ViewJr High Creek Valley School NormandaleLutheran WooddaleChurch St PatricksCatholic New CityCovenantChurch NormandaleElementary St StephensEpiscopal EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessori CalvinChristianSchool GoodSamaritanMethodist EdinaMorningsideChurch ChristPresbyterianChurch ChapelHillsCongregtional Shepard of the HillsLutheran Edina Community Lutheran Church FireStation Bla k e R d Vernon A v e Fr a n c e A v e S Xe r x e s A v e S Ca h i l l R d 70th St W Interlachen Blvd Maloney Ave 44th St W 50th St W 54th St W 58th St W Gle a s o n R d 70th St W 76th St W Dewey Hill Rd Valley View R d Valley View Rd Minnesota Dr78th St W Wo o d d a l e A v e Tr a c y A v e Parklawn Ave Co n c o r d A v e Benton Ave G l e a s o n R d Ma l i b u R d Gr e e n F a r m s R d Mc C a u l e y T r l S Mi r r o r L a k e s D r Lin c o l n D r Wa s h i n g t o n A v e Division St Verno n A v e Golf Ter Co d e A v e Wi l r y a n A v e No r m a n d a l e R d We s t S h o r e D r Corn e l i a D r Fra n c e A v e S Yo r k A v e S 77th St W Oh m s L n Hilary Ln Olinge r B l v d 66th St W An t r i m R d 63rd St W Xe r x e s A v e S 69th St W Bu s h L a k e R d Me t r o B l v d 66th St W 62nd St W Valley Ln Bro o k s i d e A v e ?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y 74th St W Valley Vi e w R d Engineering Dept October 2016 / Bicycle Facilities Bike Routes (signed and/or marked as) Green Shared Bike LanesAdvisory Bike Lanes Bike Lanes Bike Boulevards Signed Bike Routes Bike or Shared Use Paths Shared Lane Markings Approved Primary Route Approved Secondary Route O:\Users\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Comprehensive.mxd APPENDIX D Streetlights and Signs 5440 5428 5420 5411 5405 5412 5425 5410 5406 5406 5400 5420 5432 5412 5416 5424 5444 5421 5436 5433 5448 54543100 5437 5408 5417 5411 5441 5413 3113 54025400 5445 PROJECT LIMITS XE R X E S A V E YO R K A V E YO R K - Z E N I T H A L L E Y W 54TH STCity of Minneapolis City of Edina York Park W 55TH ST YO R K A V E A L L E Y XE R X E S - Y O R K A L L E Y Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round Xcel EnergyCobra Drop LenseWood Round / Engineering DeptOctober 2016 StreetlightsChowen Park D NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-439C I T Y O F E D I N A MI N N E S O T A INCORPORAT E D 1888 , e !"$ n£89:z89:z 5440 5428 5420 5411 5405 5412 5425 5410 5406 5406 5400 5420 5432 5412 5416 5424 5444 5421 5436 5433 5448 54543100 5437 5408 5417 5411 5441 5413 3113 54025400 5445 PROJECT LIMITS XE R X E S A V E YO R K A V E YO R K - Z E N I T H A L L E Y W 54TH STCity of Minneapolis City of Edina York Park W 55TH ST YO R K A V E A L L E Y XE R X E S - Y O R K A L L E Y / Engineering DeptOctober 2016 SignsChowen Park D NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-439C I T Y O F E D I N A MI N N E S O T A INCORPORAT E D 1888 , e Signs n£BUS STOP !"$R1-1 89:z W14-1 APPENDIX E Living Streets Policy 1 Living Streets Policy Introduction Living streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets and the principles and plans that will guide implementation. The Living Street Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving, reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such as the “do.town” effort related to community health, and the Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Street Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. For example, the Living Streets Policy will support the City’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which addresses mandates established under the Clean Water Act. The Living Streets Policy provides the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Plan will address how the Policy will be implemented by providing more detailed information on street design, traffic calming, bike facilities, landscaping and lighting, as well as best practices for community engagement during the design process. Lastly, existing and future supporting plans such as the Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to Schools, Sidewalk Priority Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan will help to identify which projects are priorities with respect to this Policy. Living Streets Vision Edina is a place where... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Living Streets Principles The following principles will guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. 2 All Users and All Modes The City will plan, design, and build high quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users (pedestrians, cyclists, children, elderly, and disabled) while enhancing safety and convenience for all users, and providing access and mobility for all modes. Connectivity • The City will design, operate, and maintain a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel. • The City will seek opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation. This includes preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way, and adding new rights-of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit. • The City will prioritize non-motorized improvements to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas. • The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. • Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Application • The City will apply this Living Streets Policy to all street projects including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation, or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • The City will act as an advocate for Living Street principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. • Living Streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of smaller improvements or maintenance activities over time. • The City will draw on all sources of transportation funding to implement this Policy and actively pursue grants, cost sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • All City departments will support the vision and principles outlined in the Policy in their work. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving, and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of the project proposal. 3 Exceptions: • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair, or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway, or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands, or other critical areas. Design The City will develop and adopt guidelines as part of the Living Streets Plan to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines will allow for context-sensitive designs. The City’s design guidelines will: • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial and collector streets and on local connector streets as determined by context. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The design guidelines in the Living Streets Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations, and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update the Living Streets Plan. Context Sensitivity Although many streets look more or less the same, every street is a unique combination of its neighborhood, adjacent land uses, natural features, street design, users, and modes. To accommodate these differences, the City will: • Seek input from stakeholders; • Design streets with a strong sense of place; • Be mindful of preserving and protecting natural features, such as waterways, trees, slopes, and ravines; • Be mindful of existing land uses and neighborhood character; and 4 • Coordinate with business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts. Benchmarks and Performance Measures The City will monitor and measure its performance relative to this Policy. Benchmarks demonstrating success include: • Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling; • Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely; • Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably; • An active way of life is available to all; • There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries; • No unfiltered street water flows into local waterways; storm water volume is reduced; and • Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. The City will draw on the following data to measure performance. Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Speed statistics of vehicles on local streets. Implementation The goal of this Policy is to define and guide the implementation of Living Streets principles. Several steps still need to be taken to reach this goal. The first step will be to develop a Living Streets Plan to guide the implementation of the Policy. The Plan will: • Identify and implement standards or guidelines for street and intersection design, universal pedestrian access, transit accommodations, and pedestrian crossings; • Identify and implement standards or guidelines for streetscape ecosystems, including street water management, urban forestry, street furniture, and utilities; • Identify regulatory demands and their relationship to this Policy (ADA/PROWAG, MPCA, MNMUTCD, MnDOT state aid, watershed districts); • Define the process by which residents participate in street design and request Living Streets improvements; and • Define standards for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity to ensure access to key public, private and regional destinations. 5 Additional implementation steps include: • Communicate this Policy to residents and other stakeholders; educate and engage on an ongoing basis; • Update City ordinances, engineering standards, policies and guidelines to agree with this Policy; • Inventory building and zoning codes to bring these into agreement with Living Streets principles as established by this Policy; • Update and document maintenance policies and practices to support Policy goals; • Update and document enforcement policies and practices to ensure safe streets for all modes; • Incorporate Living Streets concepts in the next circulation of the City’s general plans (Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle Plan, Active Routes to School Plan, etc.); • Incorporate Living Streets as a criteria when evaluating transportation priorities in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP); • Review and update funding policies to ensure funding sources for Living Streets projects; and • Coordinate with partner jurisdictions to achieve goals in this Policy. APPENDIX F Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 1 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Room September 15, 6:00 p.m. VI. Reports/Recommendations C. 2017 Neighborhood and MSA Street Reconstruction Draft Engineering Studies Planner Nolan said streets would be narrowed per their practice for streets with or without sidewalk. Mr. Andrew Scipioni, engineering technician with the engineering department, asked for feedback on the following studies. • Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Discussion • Engineering technician Scipioni explained that a multimodal survey was not done because of the smaller size of the project; a workshop was done instead. • Engineering technician Scipioni explained that the York/Zenith Avenue alley is too narrow for the City to maintain it (they would encroach on private property). J F M A M J J A S O N D SM WS # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME TERM (Date) 6/21 Bass, Katherine 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Boettge, Emily 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Brown, Andy 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 90% Iyer, Surya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Loeffelholz, Ralf 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Janovy, Jennifer 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Miranda, Lou 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Olson, Larry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Koester, David (student) 9/1/2017 1 1 100% Olk, Megan (student) 9/1/2017 1 1 100% Ding, Emily (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 2 20% Ruehl, Lindsey (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 40% TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE APPENDIX G Project Workshop Materials July 18, 2016 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Chowen Park D (West 54th Street) Dear Resident: As you may recall, West 54th Street is on a list of roadway reconstruction and utility improvement projects being considered by the City of Edina for the summer of 2017. The attached map identifies the project area. Please plan to attend a project workshop on Monday, August 15, 6-8 p.m. to learn about the improvements that staff is considering and provide feedback to: • Paving the roadway and adding curb and gutter. • Adding a turn-around at the York Avenue alley. • Paving the alleys at York Avenue and Zenith Avenue. Additionally, we will discuss how projects are funded, a typical construction timeline, how you will be impacted, and how you can prepare. The workshop will be held at the Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, 7450 Metro Blvd in Conference Room A. A meeting reminder will be mailed to you approximately two weeks prior. Your feedback is important to us. If you cannot attend the meeting, please contact me to provide feedback. Information presented will be available on the City of Edina’s website following the workshop at www.EdinaMN.gov/FutureProjects. If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-826-0443 or cschulze@EdinaMN.gov or the Engineering Department at 952-826-0371. Sincerely, Carter Schulze, PE Assistant City Engineer Enclosure: Project Area Map g:\eng\const\imprs\ba439 chowen pk d_2017\info mtg\20160718 info meeting letter.docx 5440 5428 5420 5411 5405 5412 5425 5410 5406 5406 5400 5420 5432 5412 5416 5424 5444 5421 5500 5436 5501 5433 5448 54543100 5437 5408 5417 5411 5441 5413 3113 54025400 5445 PROJECT LIMITS XE R X E S A V E YO R K A V E ZE N I T H A V E W 54TH STCity of Minneapolis City of Edina York Park / Engineering Dept May 2016 2017 Project AreaChowen Park D NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-439 August 3, 2016 2017 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Chowen Park D (West 54th Street) Dear Resident: This letter and project area map included on the back are a follow up to the July 18, 2016 letter. The map of the project area was revised to show where the alley areas are that were discussed in the letter. I look forward to discussing this with you at the August 15 meeting and if you cannot attend the meeting, please contact me to provide feedback. Information presented will be available on the City of Edina’s website following the workshop at www.EdinaMN.gov/FutureProjects. If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-826-0443 or cschulze@EdinaMN.gov or the Engineering Department at 952-826-0371. Sincerely, Carter Schulze, PE Assistant City Engineer Enclosure: Project Area Map g:\eng\const\imprs\ba439 chowen pk d_2017\info mtg\20160803 info meeting followup letter.docx 5440 5428 5420 5411 5405 5412 5425 5410 5406 5406 5400 5420 5432 5412 5416 5424 5444 5421 5436 5433 5448 54543100 5437 5408 5417 5411 5441 5413 3113 54025400 5445 PROJECT LIMITS XE R X E S A V E YO R K A V E ZE N I T H A L L E Y W 54TH STCity of Minneapolis City of Edina York Park W 55TH ST YO R K A L L E Y XE R X E S A L L E Y / Engineering Dept August 2016 2017 Project AreaChowen Park D NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-439 2017 CHOWEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WORKSHOP AUGUST 15, 2016 NAME ADDRESS ,/-e.1 2 1)0/ G•arS e 2 fr-? (5--'0, Yw% 9/),(6),_s. 3 51Aav1tnov Steve n/ZaCk- StMil 3 113 1).) 9-111—S± 4 Z___ ( S A _ L,L/A 5' "D A ) C LI 1 i 7- C /V ( 1- 4- 5 1-14 f /44110 TYCO X .- P< 6 ie,(/ id 7A v_oity. (_-3/, c (57: 7 Dem it( 0i le,-- 54t/b5- Y6rk. Pore_ S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 INFORMATIONAL MEETING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA CHOWEN PARK D NEIGHBORHOOD West 54th Street, York Alley, Zenith Alley DATE/TIME: August 15, 2016 @ 6:00 pm IMPROVEMENT NO.: BA-439 1. Introductions 2. Project Scope - 54th St. • Concrete Curb and Gutter • Aggregate Roadbed and Pavement Surface • Stormwater Improvements • Utilities 3. York and Zenith Alley’s • Private Property Conflicts 4. Funding Sources • 54th St Assessment Range – $10,300-$13,800 • Zenith $2,500 • York $2,000 5. Project Partners • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District – Grant Funding for Stormwater Improvements • City of Minneapolis – Cooperative Agreement • Minneapolis Park Board – Cooperative Agreement 6. Timeline • Public Hearing, Bidding, Construction, Final Assessment Hearing 7. Communications D R A F T D R A F T D R A F T APPENDIX H Correspondence from Residents 1 Andrew Scipioni From:David Goergen Sent:Thursday, August 20, 2015 11:09 AM To:Brian Olson; Chad Millner Subject:FW: Street Repair and Signage Requests Dave Goergen, Public Works Coordinator 952-826-0312 | Fax 952-826-0392 | Cell 952-292-6225 dgoergen@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lisa Ellison [mailto:pavadita@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 10:57 AM To: Shawn Anderson; Marge Bergman; David Goergen; Susan Waack Cc: THOMAS A LARSON Subject: Street Repair and Signage Requests Hi, this request is for two items: 1) Could we please get a "No Outlet" sign posted on 54th Street one block west of Xerxes. I live at the end of the dirt road that terminates into a driveway. It is unbelievable how many people continue past two dead end signs and end up stuck at the end. They often attempt, with mixed results, to turn around using my parking pad. This has resulted in damage to my vehicles and my garden (I just lost 5 tomato plants!) when they inevitably collide with the surroundings incompatible with such maneuvers. Best would be for a "No Outlet," sign posted where the paved alley intersects 54th. Since people would see the road continues and possibly keep driving, we would need another one where York intersects 54th which is the last place they could easily turn around. 2) Speaking of 54th Street, it is again riddled with potholes and the years-old gravel is now crushed into sand. Could you please fix it. Would you be able to extend the asphalt to within a few feet of the fire hydrant at the end of 54th? Asphalt was installed last year on 54th, but terminated for some reason in front of the house at 3113 54th Street W. Thank you, Lisa Ellison 5411 Zenith Ave S. 612.522.0453 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Dan Giles <dgillees@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, June 20, 2016 8:24 PM To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Re: York and 54th project Very good, thanks for you input and help. Dan > On Jun 20, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > > Dan, > > As I said before, we are still in the early phases of design, and will have a better idea of tree impacts when we meet with residents later this summer. > > As to your other comment about purchasing a portion of the York Avenue right-of-way that abuts your property, I would recommend talking to our Director of Engineering, Chad Millner (both of whom are copied on this email). Generally speaking, since the City has watermain that runs along this ROW, I am doubtful that we would consider parting with it. However, this is something else that we can discuss at our project meeting later this summer. > > Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician > 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 > ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Giles [mailto:dgillees@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:11 AM > To: Andrew Scipioni > Subject: Re: York and 54th project > > Thanks for the response, Andrew. You’re right that we’re concerned about the potential of clearing a lot of trees and we’ve also been toying with the idea of approaching the city regarding trying to purchase the small area of land just NW of us. > > You don’t know who to approach regarding this, would you? > > Thanks again, > Dan Giles > >> On Jun 10, 2016, at 4:15 PM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: >> >> Dan, >> >> At this time, we are still working to complete our topographic survey of the area in order to determine what options we will pursue. We are also working with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District due to proximity to the creek and with the City of Minneapolis, as they have utilities that run along this street. >> 2 >> We are planning to schedule a meeting with residents sometime this summer to present our options and discuss concerns; most likely, this meeting will take place in August or September. We are hoping to complete the topographic survey within the next few weeks, weather-permitting, so that we can refine our options. >> >> I'm assuming your concerns have to do with the trees that are located in the area northwest of your property? As part of our survey, we are recording the size and types of these trees so we can minimize tree clearing. >> >> Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician >> 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 >> ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, >> Raising Families & Doing Business -----Original Message----- >> From: Daniel Giles [mailto:dgillees@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 2:00 PM >> To: Andrew Scipioni >> Subject: York and 54th project >> >> Hi Andrew, >> I live at 5405 York Ave S and was hoping I could get (or referred to) some more information regarding the surveying and eventual project plans for the area and road there at York and 54th. The adjacent land to the immediate NW of our property is what I’m most interested in. Feel free to refer me on, if appropriate. >> >> Thank for your time, >> Dan Giles > 1 Andrew Scipioni From:PBK <pennbrokeith@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:30 AM To:Carter Schulze Subject:RE: Engineering and environmental (?) Hello from Keith. Thank you, Carter, for a friendly conversation. And I appreciate that you will consider taking a water sample analysis from that murky pool of standing runoff water on 54th street. You also stimulated further thoughts here, about the unsafe condition of that water pooling hole in the ground. You highlighted a possible positive comparison to other, more modern storm water runoff sewer drains that are made to pool some water, underground, for settling purposes. The corner, in the street at 54th and Xerxes has such a drain, we agreed, and is a useful comparison. Now, the reason for this current Email. That 2' wide and un-grated hole in the ground depression, filled with filthy water is under the aegis of the City of Edina. I posited that it was an ongoing unsanitary health risk and needed remediation right away. It now appears to me to also be a safety risk, hazard and "attractive danger" for those many people, old and young, who walk dogs, recreate, stroll, launch canoes, etc. in daylight and in darkness. It is an open, naturally camouflaged, deep, wide and man made hole in the ground. You compare it to a modern storm sewer but this "sewer" access point is on a routine pedestrian walkway, is set lower than the immediate surface around it, and has no secure metal cover over it nor warning signage nor fence. Also, most proper culverts are horizontal, this one includes a vertical and dangerous hole in the ground. Please create a safer drainage point here right away. Thank you, Keith Reitman On Jul 12, 2016 8:32 AM, "Carter Schulze" <CSchulze@edinamn.gov> wrote: Keith, Please recall our conversations previously regarding the 54th Street reconstruction. This project is slated for 2017. We are currently in the feasibility stage of the project and are planning an informal open house meeting with the residents affected on August 15th. This area of pipe you refer to below is definitely going to be reconstructed as part of this project. Thank you. 2 From: PBK [mailto:pennbrokeith@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 2:09 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Engineering and environmental (?) Hello from Keith Reitman at 5400 Xerxes s. Here, attached, is a picture of a long backed up and blocked culvert about 175' west of Xerxes along 54th street. Because it is tipping backwards. It is more like a toilet trap then a proper drain. For health and safety reasons this shallow, galvanized culvert needs to be replaced right away. I have brought this matter to city engineers and others @Edina many time with no documentation and no positive outcome. Because of Zika and other health concerns I can not welcome inaction any longer. Please respond and Email a proposed solution and time line. Thank you. 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Carter Schulze Sent:Wednesday, July 27, 2016 9:51 AM To:'Mike Menzel' Subject:RE: Chowen Park D Mike and Kathy, Thank you for your notification and input. I can understand the desire to save the large old trees in this alley area. One of our considerations for the alley down York Ave is to bring the traveled area, gravel or paved, out of private property of 5400 and 5406 York. This would entail taking down the one very large cotton wood tree and a couple of the other elms and box elder trees to make the turn around and access for our plow trucks. However, the southern grove of mature trees would be left alone. In other words, we want to correct some deficiencies to the alley if we were to proceed with the improvements. We can discuss these items further either before or after the meeting. Hopefully there is a good discussion on these topics that will help with the decision. 2 Sincerely, Mike Menzel Kathy Iverson 5410 York Ave S Edina, MN 55410 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Carter Schulze Sent:Thursday, August 04, 2016 3:39 PM To:Chad Millner Subject:RE: "54th St." Road Project Limits Attachments:Chowen Park D Project Area.pdf Keith, If the York Alley is improved, we would pave the gravel section similar to the paved Xerxes alley behind your home and we would also propose removing some of the trees in order to move the paved alley out of private property. We want to do this project right and that is why we are having our informational meeting with the residents in two weeks to gain input and discuss these options. In terms of the assessment, if this project weren’t bordered by Minneapolis to its north and the entire right-of-way were Edina right-of-way, we wouldn’t assess ourselves for the roadway improvement. Similarly, we are not assessing Minneapolis for this roadway project or ourselves. 5440 5428 5420 5411 5405 5412 5425 5410 5406 5406 5400 5420 5432 5412 5416 5424 5444 5421 5436 5433 5448 54543100 5437 5408 5417 5411 5441 5413 3113 54025400 5445 PROJECT LIMITS XE R X E S A V E YO R K A V E ZE N I T H A L L E Y W 54TH STCity of Minneapolis City of Edina York Park W 55TH ST YO R K A L L E Y XE R X E S A L L E Y / Engineering Dept August 2016 2017 Project AreaChowen Park D NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No: BA-439 1 Andrew Scipioni From:PBK <pennbrokeith@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, August 06, 2016 4:42 PM To:Carter Schulze Cc:Chad Millner; Scott H. Neal Subject:RE: "54th St." Road Project Limits Attachments:20160805_175611.jpg; 20160805_175700.jpg Hello from Keith Reitman at the pending 54th street area road project. Here are a couple of pictures highlighting the deficiencies of the York Alley/York Street path. These pictures were taken toward the south, dead-end, of the path. Note the make-do and make-shift parking accommodations utilized. This is with no social event, family gathering etc. occuring, at all. I do not fault the residents. With numerous houses on the block and a dead-end, a substantial makeover is needed to accommodate current and future normative traffic and parking and *safety needs. Particularly as 54th street is modernized and hence becomes more utilized by vehicles. Pictures attached. Please, do this project right* or go away. No Half-measures! On Aug 5, 2016 9:41 AM, "PBK" <pennbrokeith@gmail.com> wrote: You have unilaterally and summarily and arbitrarily and without proper "warrant" "red-lined" the most deficient quadrant of the project out of your road improvement proposal. I doubt that residents abutting there, are going to *drag it back in where it belongs, because it involves their dollars. That trail is, by far, the most in need of proper improvement. This has become a threshold issue. If you (the Edina engineering dept) are not willing and able to identify and address the most sorely needed improvement that you have already excluded, then you need to cease this gerrymandering juggernaut immediately. Thank you. Keith Reitman On Aug 5, 2016 9:10 AM, "Carter Schulze" <CSchulze@edinamn.gov> wrote: Keith, We have invited the residents that utilize the alley to the meeting on the 15th and I plan to discuss the alley improvements during the meeting. 1 Andrew Scipioni From:PBK <pennbrokeith@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, August 07, 2016 9:02 PM To:Carter Schulze Cc:Chad Millner; Scott H. Neal Subject:RE: "54th St." Road Project Limits Attachments:20160807_135556.jpg Hello from Keith Reitman. In examining your friendly "Open House Meeting Reminder" post card I am concerned by your omissions. The card says: "Please plan to attend to learn: How projects are funded. Typical construction timeline. How you will be impacted. How you can prepare; and more." What the card does not say, and you, as the host, have omitted is very troubling in my opinion. The invitation does not include a request for informed stakeholder feedback to your Roadway Reconstruction Plan(s) and you, literally, haven't offered to listen at this open house. This "plan" appears already hatched by your engineering dept. And this meeting now appears likely to be a charade of Neighbor/Stakeholder participation crossed with Gerrymandering Project Limits. Limits that are not adhering to the highest potential broad project improvement outcome. Clearly there is an agenda revealed and it is toward a lessor goal and outcome than is warranted by any honest metric of such projects. I am sure of this. What I don't know is why a small road improvement project can be so wrongly sliced and diced to leave the most needed elements off limits and a perfectly good and new section of roadway ripped out and replaced? Attached is a photo of your "meeting reminder" as I have quoted from it. Thank you Keith Reitman On Aug 6, 2016 4:42 PM, "PBK" <pennbrokeith@gmail.com> wrote: Hello from Keith Reitman at the pending 54th street area road project. Here are a couple of pictures highlighting the deficiencies of the York Alley/York Street path. These pictures were taken toward the south, dead-end, of the path. Note the make-do and make-shift parking accommodations utilized. This is with no social event, family gathering etc. occuring, at all. I do not fault the residents. With numerous houses on the block and a dead-end, a substantial makeover is needed to accommodate current and future normative traffic and parking and *safety needs. Particularly as 54th street is modernized and hence becomes more utilized by vehicles. Pictures attached. Please, do this project right* or go away. No Half-measures! On Aug 5, 2016 9:41 AM, "PBK" <pennbrokeith@gmail.com> wrote: 2 You have unilaterally and summarily and arbitrarily and without proper "warrant" "red-lined" the most deficient quadrant of the project out of your road improvement proposal. I doubt that residents abutting there, are going to *drag it back in where it belongs, because it involves their dollars. That trail is, by far, the most in need of proper improvement. This has become a threshold issue. If you (the Edina engineering dept) are not willing and able to identify and address the most sorely needed improvement that you have already excluded, then you need to cease this gerrymandering juggernaut immediately. Thank you. Keith Reitman On Aug 5, 2016 9:10 AM, "Carter Schulze" <CSchulze@edinamn.gov> wrote: Keith, We have invited the residents that utilize the alley to the meeting on the 15th and I plan to discuss the alley improvements during the meeting. 3 Thanks for the feedback and questions. Our goal in the neighborhood meeting on August 15 is to discuss these questions and gain input from all of the residents. If either of the alleys are paved, they would be designed similarly to the Xerxes alley behind your home. Also, we are working with Minneapolis and the Watershed District on this project and we will share any developing information we have at the meeting. 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Gmail <pavadita@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:36 PM To:Carter Schulze Subject:54th street Attachments:IMG_5394.JPG; ATT00001.txt Hi Carter, When you talk to Mpls and they refuse to pay for their part of the street you can show them that people park there and launch their boats, floated, etc. Grrrr... Lisa 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Zack Steven <zsteven@zackaroos.com> Sent:Thursday, August 25, 2016 8:22 PM To:Carter Schulze Cc:Shannon Steven Subject:Re: Chowen Park D / Creek improvements Hi Carter, We are interested in options for the low area - please keep us posted regarding options. Thanks! Zack and Shannon On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:46 PM, Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Zack, Our next steps regarding the swale are to prepare a watershed district grant application. Pending their granting of funding, we will move towards final design. That is when we will decide, with your input, on the specific plantings and vegetation cover that would be best in this situation. As of now, we don’t have any plans to improve the low area adjacent to the York alley area, but we can certainly pose the question to the watershed and our water resources coordinator to see if any minimal impact solutions exist. <image001.gif> Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Zack Steven [mailto:zsteven@zackaroos.com] Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 10:10 AM To: Carter Schulze Cc: Shannon Steven Subject: Chowen Park D / Creek improvements Hi Carter, To follow up on our conversation at the meeting last Monday, how can we move forward with input on the plants in the swale area in front of our house and better water management for the area between our property and York Alley? Our view of the creek is a significant reason that we purchased the house, and we're optimistic that this project can result in improvements that are visually appealing and better for water quality. We'd like to preserve our view of the creek water while introducing some attractive vegetation in the swale. We are also interested in options for improving the water management to the west of our house which has low lying area (also impacts 5405 York) that collects standing water after heavy rains in the spring. It would be great to leverage this project to improve those conditions as well. Thanks, 2 Zack and Shannon Steven 3113 W 54th St. 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Carter Schulze Sent:Friday, September 02, 2016 3:11 PM To:'PBK' Subject:RE: My Sight lines at Xerxes alley Thanks Keith. We will continue to investigate our signage options in this unique area. As far as the camera’s go, we have all of our camera resources booked for now due to our annual bike and ped counting that is done at this time of year, but when a camera is freed up we will get it on site to gather more traffic pattern data. 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Zack Steven <zsteven@zackaroos.com> Sent:Saturday, September 03, 2016 6:59 PM To:Andrew Scipioni Cc:Carter Schulze Subject:Re: Question about curb in Chowen D We would be happy to have the curb raised a bit on the south side, to ensure a sufficient grade and allow us to even out our yard over some tree roots near the street. Look forward to hearing more as the design is refined. Thanks, Zack > On Aug 31, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > > Zach, > > We are still refining our design, but our initial thoughts were to hold close to the existing southern edge of the street and lower the northern side to allow drainage into the swale and ultimately out to the creek. However, as we are confined by the shallow 48" watermain on the Minneapolis side, we may have to alter this design by slightly raising the curb on the south side or, more likely, reducing the grade of the street from 2.5% to 2% or 1.5%. > > Once installed, our contractor would place new topsoil and grade your lawn to match into the new curb. > > Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician > 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 > ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov > > -----Original Message----- > From: Zack Steven [mailto:zsteven@zackaroos.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 12:23 PM > To: Andrew Scipioni > Cc: Carter Schulze > Subject: Re: Question about curb in Chowen D > > Very helpful! Do you know yet if the ribbon curb will be higher than the current street level to account for the slope to the north drain? Or will the north side of the street be lowered? > Thanks > >> On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: >> >> Zach, >> >> I've attached two pictures; the first shows the proposed cross section of W 54th St, with the Design V modified curb (or ribbon curb) on the south side and the standard B618 curb & gutter on the north. >> >> The second shows an example of ribbon curb installed in the City. This alley is located in the Interlachen Park neighborhood, between Spruce Road, Belmore Lane, Blake Road, and Interlachen Country Club. >> >> If you have any additional questions, let me know. 2 >> >> Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician >> 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 >> ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov -----Original Message----- >> From: Zack Steven [mailto:zsteven@zackaroos.com] >> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 12:13 PM >> To: Carter Schulze >> Cc: Andrew Scipioni >> Subject: Re: Question about curb in Chowen D >> >> Thanks! >> >>> On Aug 29, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: >>> >>> Zack >>> >>> I'm at a conference this week, but we can touch base with you and get you the curb information you are looking for. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Aug 28, 2016, at 07:45, Zack Steven <zsteven@zackaroos.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Carter, >>>> Could you send me a photo or drawing of the curb that will be running along the south side of 54th? I thought you said it would just be a flush strip of concrete.... We're trying to anticipate what that will mean for the edge of our yard and grass, walk, etc. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Zack >> <W 54th St Proposed Section.JPG> >> <Spruce Rd Ribbon Curb.JPG> 1 Andrew Scipioni From:PBK <pennbrokeith@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 13, 2016 11:43 AM To:THOMAS A LARSON Cc:Zack Steven; (1) Carole Cera; Carter Schulze Subject:Re: A snapshot of parking use and need. One Neighbor's evening gathering. Hello from Keith. My current opinion is: Whether or not there is 'one side of street' parking on 54th street, the York "alley" needs to be repurposed to modern and proper standards along it's full length to properly accommodate all normative uses and accesses of a street including parking, emergency and transfer access. I do not necessarily support "one side" parking but if there IS one side parking, the Southside should be by "resident permit" only. On Sep 13, 2016 11:21 AM, "THOMAS A LARSON" <larsonthom@msn.com> wrote: That sounds good to me. Thanks for asking. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 13, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Thank you Keith. Engineering is still recommending 1 sided parking, but I would like to know the resident’s preference on side. We initially were planning on the north side with no parking signs (maybe 3 total) on the south side. Please forward on to others I missed and respond back with preference. Thanks <image001.gif> Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: PBK [mailto:pennbrokeith@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 9:38 AM To: THOMAS A LARSON; Carter Schulze; Keith Reitman; (1) Carole Cera Subject: A snapshot of parking use and need. One Neighbor's evening gathering. 2 Just a "snapshot" of a moment in time. I leave open the forensics of use and needs interpretation and conclusions. 1 Andrew Scipioni From:Carter Schulze Sent:Tuesday, October 25, 2016 7:57 AM To:'THOMAS A LARSON' Subject:RE: 10-24-2016 W 54th Street Update No, we are just getting permission to work on their property with our storm sewer outlet to the creek and our restoration. 2 recommending paving both alleys and maintaining(snowplowing) only the York Avenue Alley as is currently the maintenance plan. The York Avenue Alley will be relocated to the east to remove it from private property. This will involve removing two trees currently in the way. Note that one of these two trees is a very large cottonwood that is leaning over multiple homes in the area. Regards <image001.gif> Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov APPENDIX I Preliminary Assessment Roll CH O W E N P A R K D N E I G H B O R H O O D R O A D W A Y I M P R O V E M E N T S IM P R O V E M E N T N O . B A - 4 3 9 PR E L I M I N A R Y A S S E S S M E N T R O L L PI D Ow n e r Ho u s e N o . S t r e e t As s e s s a b l e RE U As s e s s m e n t Am o u n t As s e s s a b l e RE U As s e s s m e n t Am o u n t As s e s s a b l e RE U Assessment AmountTotal Assessment 1 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 2 8 Za c h a r y K & S h a n n o n M S t e v e n 31 1 3 W 5 4 t h S t 1 11 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2, 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 0 -$ 13,570.00 $ 2 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 0 4 Ca r o l e G C e r a 54 0 0 Xe r x e s A v e 0. 5 5, 6 1 5 . 0 0 $ 0 - $ 0 -$ 5,615.00 $ 3 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 0 5 Ca r o l e C e r a & K e i t h D R e i t m a n 54 0 2 Xe r x e s A v e 0. 5 5, 6 1 5 . 0 0 $ 0 - $ 0 -$ 5,615.00 $ 4 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 2 9 Th o m a s A & B e v e r l y E L a r s o n 54 0 0 Yo r k A v e 1 11 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2, 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2,600.00 $ 16,170.00 $ 5 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 2 6 Da n i e l G i l e s & J a n i c e M l a d o n i c k y 54 0 5 Yo r k A v e 0 - $ 1 2, 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 0 -$ 2,340.00 $ 6 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 3 0 Pe t e r C K e l s c h 54 0 6 Yo r k A v e 1 11 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2, 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2,600.00 $ 16,170.00 $ 7 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 3 1 To d R & K i m b e r l y L T e e p l e 54 0 8 Yo r k A v e 1 11 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2, 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 1 2,600.00 $ 16,170.00 $ 8 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 3 2 Ka t h r y n I v e r s o n 54 1 0 Yo r k A v e 0. 5 5, 6 1 5 . 0 0 $ 1 2, 3 4 0 . 0 0 $ 0 -$ 7,955.00 $ 9 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 4 0 Li s a M E l l i s o n 54 0 1 Ze n i t h A v e 0 - $ 0 - $ 0 -$ -$ 10 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 3 9 Li s a M E l l i s o n 54 0 5 Ze n i t h A v e 0 - $ 0 - $ 0 -$ -$ 11 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 3 8 Li s a M E l l i s o n 54 0 9 Ze n i t h A v e 0 - $ 0 - $ 0 -$ -$ 12 20 - 0 2 8 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 0 0 3 7 Li s a M E l l i s o n 54 1 1 Ze n i t h A v e 1 11 , 2 3 0 . 0 0 $ 0 - $ 1 2,600.00 $ 13,830.00 $ To t a l 6. 5 72 , 9 9 5 . 0 0 $ 6 14 , 0 4 0 . 0 0 $ 4 10,400.00 $ 97,435.00 $ We s t 5 4 t h S t r e e t Y o r k A v e n u e A l l e y Y o r k - Z e n i t h A l l e y Submission from Kathryn Iverson 5410 York Ave So Edina, MN 55410 Email: menze002@umn.edu The proposed project for our neighborhood (W. 54th St) and the alleyways requires a unique understanding of this area. It has AMAZING trees, which will be greatly affected. This secluded area with 3 alleyways leading to dead ends and with few homes, makes it a unique situation. When looking at the intention of the City of Edina to preserve valuable "heritage" trees, on the tear-down residential sites, it seems logical to also consider the heritage value of these trees to this neighborhood- even though the project is a street project. First, a couple questions: It has been stated that this project is being requested to limit the amount of maintenance that the current roadways require. The street supervisor has said that he receives calls to have new gravel put on the roadbeds. What does it cost for this maintenance? How often is it recorded that this has been done? I am personally questioning the need for paving the alleyway leading to the 5410 York Driveway. I wonder if a compromise decision could lead to dumping a load of gravel at the north end of the York alleyway (as needed) and the residents using that alleyway could spread it? HEY, I WILL DO ANYTHING TO SAVE THOSE TREES! I have attached some documents on the value of trees. This estimate is based on a tree of a 45 inch diameter. These trees are much larger, so one can assume that the trees are even more valuable. The project plan I was told that it would be done with significant digging and grading to the roadbed before the asphalt goes down. Under this scenario, how can the trees be protected along the alleyway leading to 5410 York Av So. I can't imagine that there is any way to do this project without significant damage. Should these trees be damaged to the point of destruction or death, what is in the project budget for tree replacement? Who pays for the trees? The proposed turnaround - Please consider a different option There have been years (we have lived in our home since 1989) of garbage trucks, and snowplows using this roadway and making turnarounds, without any of the residents aware of a fact that these trucks have difficulty accomplishing this. I would personally like to speak to the public works staff about this situation, before any decision is made. An Option It would be most beneficial to this neighborhood to use the alleyway that is behind Xerxes, which has a large apron on the north side, (as it is much larger than the width of that same alleyway going south), for a turnaround. Calculate another tree Eastern cottonwood Popul us deltoides 0 Stonnwater 0 Property Value la Electricity 0 Natural Gas 0 Air Quality 0 CO2 This 45 inch Eastern cottonwood provides overall benefits of: $356 every year. While some functional benefits of trees are well documented, others are difficult to quantify (e.g., human social and communal health). Trees' specific geography, climate, and interactions with humans and infrastructure is highly variable and makes precise calculations that much more difficult. Given these complexities, the results presented here should be considered initial approximations—a general accounting of the benefits produced by urban street-side plantings. Benefits of trees do not account for the costs associated with trees' long-term care and maintenance. $196.17 $61.84 Breakdown of your tree's benefits Click on one of the tabs above for more detail If this tree is cared for and grows to 50 inches, it will provide $356 in annual benefits. • ^ - • Overal Benefits Storm Water Property Value CO2 About the Model Energy Air Quality 4.4 Home National Tree Benefit Calculator Beta .,.o..gaSeyTg cii TC- The National Tree Benefit Calculator was conceived and developed by Casey Trees and Davey Tree Expert Co. DAVEY#. Re_ it/ is-pc, Air Quality Overal Benefits Storm Water Property Value 1 Energy CO2 About the Model Your 45 inch Eastern cottonwood will conserve 485 Kilowatt hours of electricity for cooling and reduce consumption of oil or natural gas by 63 therm(s). Trees modify climate and conserve building energy use in three principal ways (see figure at left): • Shading reduces the amount of heat absorbed and stored by buildings. • Evapotranspiration converts liquid water to water vapor and cools the air by using solar energy that would otherwise result in heating of the air. • Tree canopies slow down winds thereby reducing the amount of heat lost from a home, especially where conductivity is high (e.g., glass windows). Strategically placed trees can increase home energy efficiency. In summer, trees shading east and west walls keep buildings cooler. In winter, allowing the sun to strike the southern side of a building can warm interior spaces. If southern walls are shaded by dense evergreen trees there may be a resultant increase in winter heating costs. For more information visit: nigrantstagijklaanimmat Home Calculate another tree National Tree Benefit Calculator Beta ,Case Trees' The National Tree Benefit Calculator was conceived and developed by Casey Trees and Davey Tree Expert Co. DAVEY*. 03 VOC M1102 NO2 SO2 SO2 PM10 P1r110 Dep Avd Dep Avd Dep Avd Dep Avd Overal Benefits Storm Water Property Value Air Quality I CO2 About the Model Energy "Dep" stands for deposition. This is your tree absorbing or intercepting pollutants. "Ave stands for avoided. This is your tree lessening the need for creation of these pollutants in the first place by reducing energy production needs. Air quality benefits of your 45 inch Eastern cottonwood shown in the graph at left. Air pollution is a serious health threat that causes asthma, coughing, headaches, respiratory and heart disease, and cancer. Over 150 million people live in areas where ozone levels violate federal air quality standards; more than 100 million people are impacted when dust and other particulate levels are considered "unhealthy." We now know that the urban forest can mitigate the health effects of pollution by: • Absorbing pollutants like ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide through leaves • Intercepting particulate matter like dust, ash and smoke • Releasing oxygen through photosynthesis • Lowering air temperatures which reduces the production of ozone • Reducing energy use and subsequent pollutant emissions from power plants It should be noted that trees themselves emit biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) which can contribute to ground-level ozone production. This may negate the positive impact the tree has on ozone mitigation for some high emitting species (e.g. Willow Oak or Sweetgum). However, the sum total of the tree's environmental benefits always trumps this negative. For more information visit: The Center for Urban Forest Research Home Calculate another tree National Tree Benefit Calculator Seta 1^,1 r‘ Casey Trees' The National Tree Benefit Calculator was conceived and developed by Casey Trees and Davey Tree Expert Co. DAVEY# [Oven I Benefits Storm Water Property Value Energy Air Quality CO2 About the Model Your 45 inch Eastern cottonwood will intercept 7,239 gallons of stormwater runoff this year. Urban stormwater runoff (or "non-point source pollution") washes chemicals (oil, gasoline, salts, etc.) and litter from surfaces such as roadways and parking lots into streams, wetlands, rivers and oceans. The more impervious the surface (e.g., concrete, asphalt, rooftops), the more quickly pollutants are washed into our community waterways. Drinking water, aquatic life and the health of our entire ecosystem can be adversely effected by this process. Trees act as mini-reservoirs, controlling runoff at the source. Trees reduce runoff by: • Intercepting and holding rain on leaves, branches and bark • Increasing infiltration and storage of rainwater through the tree's root system • Reducing soil erosion by slowing rainfall before it strikes the soil For more information visit: The Center for Urban Forest Research Canopy Intact"lion and Evaporation Wish)nation 1St Up Sol nwrvl SI-DrAfiv P;)krk! Home Calculate another tree National Tree Benefit Calculator Beta CaseyTrees' The National Tree Benefit Calculator was conceived and developed by DAVEY#. Sequestered Avoided This year your 45 inch Eastern cottonwood tree will reduce atmospheric carbon by 1,290 pounds. How significant is this number? Most car owners of an "average" car (mid-sized sedan) drive 12,000 miles generating about 11,000 pounds of CO2 every year. A flight from New York to Los Angeles adds 1,400 pounds of CO2 per passenger. Trees can have an impact by reducing atmospheric carbon in two primary ways (see figure at left): • They sequester Clock up") CO2 in their roots, trunks, stems and leaves while they grow, and in wood products after they are harvested. • Trees near buildings can reduce heating and air conditioning demands, thereby reducing emissions associated with power production. Combating climate change will take a worldwide, multifaceted approach, but by planting a tree in a strategic location, driving fewer miles, or replacing business trips with conference calls, it's easy to see how we can each reduce our Individual carbon "footprints." For more information visit: The Center for Urban Forest Research National Tree Benefit Calculator Home Calculate another tree Beta L Overall Benefits 11 Storm Water Property Value Energy Air Quality i CO2 About the Model CaseyTrees- W 5111,4[VH VL The National Tree Benefit Calculator was conceived and developed by Casey Trees and Davey Tree Expert Co. DAVE14 ii11114 MU NU (HIND PLAN RIB alcaLINLILb alleet The Value of Trees Studies prove that trees have a positive effect on many aspects of people's lives, including their health, homes, businesses, communities, drinking water, and air quality. Economic Contributions • Research shows that shoppers in well-landscaped business districts are willing to pay more for parking and up to 12% more for goods and services.' • Landscaping, especially with trees, can significantly increase property values. Here is one example: A value of 9% ($15,000) was determined in a U.S. Tax Court case for the loss of a large black oak on a property valued at $164,500." • Trees reduce runoff and erosion from storms by about 7% and reduce the need for erosion control structures. In urban areas with trees, the use of smaller drainpipes can save cities on materials, installation and maintenance." • Desk workers with and without views of nature were surveyed. Those without views of nature, when asked about 11 different ailments, claimed 23% more incidence of illness in the prior 6 months.' • Amenity and comfort ratings were about 80% higher for a tree-lined sidewalk compared with those for a nonshaded street. Quality of products ratings were 30% higher in districts having trees over those with barren sidewalks.' • In the United States over 200 million cubic yards of urban tree and landscape residue are generated every year.' Of the 200 million cubic yards of urban tree and landscape residue, 15% is classified as "unchipped logs." If these logs were sawn into boards, they theoretically would produce 3.8 billion board feet of lumber, or nearly 30% of the hardwood lumber produced annually in the United States.1 Energy Savings • The net cooling effect of a young, healthy tree is equivalent to 10 room-size air conditioners operating 20 hours a day.2° • Trees properly placed around buildings as windbreaks can save up to 25% on winter heating costs.' • As few as three trees properly positioned can save the average household between $100 and $250 annually in energy costs.' • Fifty million shade trees planted in strategic, energy-saving locations could eliminate the need for seven 100-megawatt power plants." • Shade from two large trees on the west side of a house and one on the east side can save up to 30% of a typical residence's annual air conditioning costs." • Annual benefits provided by parking lot trees in Sacramento, California, (8.1% tree shade) were valued at approximately $700,000 for improved air quality. By increasing shade to 50% in all parking lots in Sacramento, the annual benefits will increase to $4 million.9 • Rows of trees reduce windspeed by up to about 85%, with maximum reductions increasing in proportion to visual density. Because even a single row of dense conifers can cause large reductions in windspeed, effective windbreaks can be planted on relatively small house lots. Compared with an open area, a good windbreak that does not shade the house will save about 15% of the heat energy used in a typical home.' Urban and Community Forestry Appreciation Tool Kit I I(15A Cnrnrt cnntirn MA 1M (Y) 'R.ec << iL5ON statistics sneet continued Environntai r..ontributions • Modest increases of 10% canopy cover in the New York City Area were shown to reduce peak ozone levels by up to 4 parts per billion or by nearly 3% of the maximum and 37% of the amount by which the area exceeded its air quality standard. Similar results were found in Los Angeles and along the East Coast from Baltimore to Boston.' • Leafy tree canopies catch precipitation before it reaches the ground, allowing some of it to gently drip and the rest to evaporate. This lessens the force of storms and reduces runoff and erosion. Research indicates that 100 mature tree crowns intercept about 100,000 gallons of rainfall per year, reducing runoff and providing cleaner water." • Trees reduce noise pollution by absorbing sounds. A belt of trees 98 feet wide and 49 feet tall can reduce highway noise by 6 to 10 decibels.' • Trees in Davis, California, parking lots reduced asphalt temperatures by as much as 36 degrees Fahrenheit, and car interior temperatures by over 47 degrees Fahrenheit." • Philadelphia's 2.1 million trees currently store approximately 481,000 metric tons of carbon with an estimated value of $9.8 million.14 • A typical community forest of 10,000 trees will retain approximately 10 million gallons of rainwater per year.' Social Contributions • Views of nature reduce the stress response of both body and mind when stressors of urban conditions are present.' • Trees in urban parks and recreation areas are estimated to improve outdoor leisure and recreation experiences in the United States by $2 billion per year.' • Trees reduce crime. Apartment buildings with high levels of greenery had 52% fewer crimes than those without any trees. Buildings with medium amounts of greenery had 42% fewer crimes.' • Hospital patients recovering from surgery who had a view of a grove of trees through their windows required fewer pain relievers, experienced fewer complications, and left the hospital sooner than similar patients who had a view of a brick wal1.21' 22 • Americans travel about 2.3 billion miles per day on urban freeways and highways. Studies show drivers exposed to roadside nature scenes had a greater ability to cope with driving stresses.' • Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children are relieved after contact with nature. Specifically, ADHD kids are better able to concentrate, complete tasks, and follow directions after playing in natural settings. The greener the setting, the more relief." • Trees help girls succeed. On average, the greener a girl's view from home, the better she concentrates and the better her self-discipline, enabling her to make more thoughtful choices and do better in school." • Trees and forests in urban areas convey serenity and beauty along a number of sensory dimensions, often surrounding the individual with nature in an environment where natural things are at a premium.' braulL_ meet continued References 1. Bratkovich, Stephen M. 2001. Utilizing Municipal Trees: Ideas from Across the Country. NA-TP-06-01. [Newtown Square, PA:1 USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. 2. Dwyer, J. F.; Schroeder, H. W.; Gobster, P. H. 1991. The Significance of Urban Trees and Forests: Toward a Deeper Understanding of Values. Journal of Arboriculture 17(10). 3. Dwyer, John F.; Schroeder, Herbert W.; Louviere, Jordan J.; Anderson, Donald H. 1989. Urbanities [sic] Willingness to Pay for Trees and Forests in Recreation Areas. Journal of Arboriculture 15(10). 4. Heisler, Gordon M. 1990. Tree plantings that save energy. In: Rodbell, Philip D., ed. Proceedings of the Fourth Urban Forestry Conference; 1989 October 15-19; St Louis, MO. Washington, DC: American Forestry Association. 5. Heisler, G.M. 1986. Energy Savings With Trees. Journal of Arboriculture 12. 6. Kaplan, R.; Kaplan, S. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 7. Kuo, F.; Sullivan, W. 2001. Environment and Crime in the Inner City: Does Vegetation Reduce Crime? Environment and Behavior 33(3). 8. Luley, Christopher J.; Nowak, David J. 2004. Help Clear the Smog with Your Urban Forest What You and Your Urban Forest Can Do About Ozone. Brochure. Davey Research Group and USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 9. McPherson, E.G. 2001. Sacramento's Parking Lot Shading Ordinance: Environmental and Economic Costs of Compliance. Landscape and Urban Planning 57. 10. McPherson, E.G.; Simpson, IR. 2003. Potential Energy Savings in Buildings by an Urban Tree Planting Program in California. Urban Greening 2(2003), 11. Miller, Alban L.; Riley, J.; Schwaab, E.; Rabaglia, R.; Miller, K. 1995. Maryland's Forests:A Health Report. Annapolis: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Forest Service. 12. Neely, D., ed. 1988. Valuation of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Other Plants, 7th ed. Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers, International Society of Arboriculture. 13. New Jersey Forest Service. [undated]. Benefits of trees. Fact sheet. Jackson, NJ: Forest Resource Education Center. 14. Nowak, D.; Crane, D.; Stevens, J. 2003. Draft Plan. Philadelphia's Urban Forest, Urban Forest Effects Model (UFORE) Analysis. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 15. Parsons, R.; Tassinary, L.G.; Ulrich, R.S.; Hebl, M.R.; Grossman-Alexander, M. 1998. The View From the Road: Implications for Stress Recovery and Immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18(2). 16. Scott, Klaus I.; Simpson, James R.; McPherson, E. Gregory. 1999. Effects of Tree Cover on Parking Lot Microclimate and Vehicle Emissions. Journal of Arboriculture 25(3). 17. Simpson, J.R.; McPherson, E.G. 1996. Potential of Tree Shade for Reducing Residential Energy use in California. Journal of Arboriculture 22(1). 18. Taylor, A.F.; Kuo, F.; Sullivan, W. 2001. Coping with ADD: The Surprising Connection to Green Play Settings. Environment and Behavior 33(1). 19. Taylor, Andrea Faber; Kuo, Frances E.; Sullivan, William C. 2002. Views of Nature and Self-Discipline: Evidence from Inner City Children. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22(1-2). 20. The National Arbor Day Foundation. 2004. The value of trees to a community. wwwarborday.orgltrees/Benefitscfm (January 12). 21. Ulrich, R. 1984. View through Window May Influence Recovery from Surgery. Science 224. 22. Ulrich, R.S. 1985. Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 13. 23. U.S. Department of Energy. 2003. Energy Savers, lips on Saving Money and Energy at Home. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Clearinghouse. 24. USDA Forest Service. 2003. Is All Your Rain Going Down the Drain? Look to Bioretainment-Trees are a Solution. Davis, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Center for Urban Forest Research. 25. USDA Forest Service, 2003. Benefits of Urban Trees. Urban and Community Forestry: Improving Our Quality of Life. Forestry Report R8-FR 71. [Atlanta, GA:] Southern Region. 26. Whittier, Jack; Rue, Denise; Haase, Scott. 1995. Urban Tree Residues: Results of the First National Inventory. Journal of Arboriculture 21(2). 27. Wolf, K. L. 1999. Nature and Commerce: Human Ecology in Business Districts. In: Kollins, C., ed. Building Cities of Green: Proceedings of the 9th National Urban Forest Conference. Washington, DC: American Forests, 28. Wolf, Kathy L. 1998. Trees in Business Districts: Positive Effects on Consumer Behavior! Fact Sheet #5. Seattle: University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Center for Urban Horticulture. 29. Wolf, Kathy L. 2000. The Calming Effect of Green: Roadside Landscape and Driver Stress. Factsheet #8. Seattle: University of Washington, Center for Urban Horticulture. The CITY of EDINA Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Improvements BA-439 Public Improvement Hearing November 15, 2016 The CITY of EDINA Project Details •Initiated as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program •9 properties •Dead End •Gravel Road •2 Gravel Alleys •1 Minneapolis fire hydrant •Adjacent to Minnehaha Creek www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA Project Stakeholders www.EdinaMN.gov 3 City of Edina City of Minneapolis Minneapolis Park Board MnDNR H e n n e p i n C o u n t y The CITY of EDINA Project Nomenclature •W 54th Street •York-Zenith Alley •York Avenue Alley www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA Existing Roadway Details •Public Works temporarily paved a portion of W 54th St. in 2014 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA Existing Roadway Details •W 54th St. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 •York Avenue Alley •York-Zenith Alley The CITY of EDINA Existing Roadway Details www.EdinaMN.gov 7 •York Avenue to York Avenue Alley The CITY of EDINA Proposed Roadway Improvements •Recycle existing pavement and gravel section where feasible and construct new street •Install curb on W 54th St. www.EdinaMN.gov 8 The CITY of EDINA Proposed Alley Improvements •Recycle gravel where feasible •Relocate into ROW •Pave Alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Xerxes-York Alley 2014 The CITY of EDINA Existing Storm Sewer Details •This area is not identified by the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan •Localized surface drainage issues, verified by resident comments •Direct point sources to Creek www.EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of EDINA Existing Storm Sewer Details www.EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY of EDINA Proposed Storm Water Improvements www.EdinaMN.gov 12 •Replace Pipes with biofiltration basin and rip rap outfall The CITY of EDINA Proposed Storm Water Improvements www.EdinaMN.gov 13 The CITY of EDINA Proposed Storm Sewer Improvements www.EdinaMN.gov 14 •Green Infrastructure Stormwater Cost Sharing Grant •- Water Quality Improvement •- Education and Outreach •Citizens Advisory Approved 50% Cost Share ($15,900) •Next Step is Board Approval December 8, 2016 The CITY of EDINA Existing Water Main Details www.EdinaMN.gov 15 •Existing Minneapolis Hydrant •Existing Minneapolis 48” Water Main •Mix of Edina and Minneapolis Water supply The CITY of EDINA Estimated Project Cost www.EdinaMN.gov 16 Item Total Costs1 West 54th Street2: $ 72,995 York Ave Alley Total2: $14,040 York-Zenith Alley Total2: $10,400 Utilities: Sanitary Sewer $ 12,790 Watermain $ 0 Storm Sewer 3 $ 76,930 Total Project: $187,155 1 Cost shown in estimated 2017 dollars 2 Cost to be assessed to benefitting residents 3 Includes curb and gutter and storm treatment costs The CITY of EDINA Project Nomenclature •W 54th Street •York-Zenith Alley •York Avenue Alley www.EdinaMN.gov 17 The CITY of EDINA Proposed W 54th St Assessments www.EdinaMN.gov 18 •Based on Residential Equivalent Units (REU) •1 single family home = 1 REU •Estimated assessment per REU = $11,230 •Final assessments are calculated after final construction costs are determined The CITY of EDINA Proposed York Ave Alley Assessments www.EdinaMN.gov 19 •Based on Residential Equivalent Units (REU) •1 single family home = 1 REU •Estimated assessment per REU = $2,340 •Final assessments are calculated after final construction costs are determined The CITY of EDINA Proposed York-Zenith Alley Assessments www.EdinaMN.gov 20 •Based on Residential Equivalent Units (REU) •1 single family home = 1 REU •Estimated assessment per REU = $2,600 •Final assessments are calculated after final construction costs are determined The CITY of EDINA Project Schedule www.EdinaMN.gov 21 Project Open House September 28, 2015 Project Workshop August 15, 2016 ETC Engineering Study Review September 15, 2016 Receive Engineering Report November 1, 2016 Public Hearing November 15, 2016 Bid Opening March/April 2017 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2017 Complete Construction Summer 2017 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2018 The CITY of EDINA Project Recommendations www.EdinaMN.gov 22 •Feasibility: Staff believes the project is feasible, cost effective, and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Chowen Park D Neighborhood •Authorize: Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, BA-439 The CITY of EDINA Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 23 Thanks for your time! Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Cost Sharing Agreement - 4500 Valley View Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Cost-Sharing Agreement and accept Public Easement to facilitate construction of a new restaurant. INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to the construction of public improvements adjacent to the Town Hall Station restaurant. This Cost-Sharing Agreement includes public improvements located within existing right-of-way and new public easements. ATTACHMENTS: Description THS Cost Sharing staff report THS Performance Agreement November 15, 2016 Mayor and City Council Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Town Hall Station – Cost Sharing Agreement Information / Background: The site at 4500 Valley View Road has been vacant for two years since Wally’s Service Station closed in September 2014. It has been very challenging for the long-term property owners to find a suitable tenant that can re-use the existing structure and create a successful and desirable amenity for the neighborhood. Fortunately, site development approvals have been recently secured (refer to Resolution 2016-89), and the owners and tenant have found a way to overcome the numerous obstacles that prevented re-use of the site years ago. One of the unanticipated project costs is the inclusion of public improvements that were recommended in the March 2015 Wooddale-Valley View Small Area Plan. These public improvements include a public sidewalk along Wooddale and Valley View as well as a public plaza near the intersection. The property owners and business tenant have agreed to incorporate these recommendations in their site plans if the City can fund the costs of the public improvements located within public right-of-way and easements. The property owners have agreed to donate public easements totaling 1,878 square feet. These easements are in addition to the existing public right-of-way that surrounds the shopping center. The attached Agreement will allow the tenant, Town Hall Station, to construct the public improvements and be reimbursed upon completion. The tenant will already have STAFF REPORT Page 2 construction crews on site to build other elements on private property. We expect that scheduling efficiencies will be achieved by having only one contractor on site at a cost equal to or less than that incurred if the City were to contract for the same work separately. All public improvements must be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Edina engineering standards and are subject to City inspection before they are deemed acceptable. The City’s engineering staff has reviewed the costs and found them to be consistent with unit costs typically incurred by the City for this type of work. The work is anticipated to begin in late 2016 and be completed in early summer 2017. The tenant will be reimbursed for actual costs incurred, not to exceed $57,732.00. Existing incremental taxes are anticipated to be used to reimburse the tenant for the cost of these public improvements. This is an acceptable use of funds collected in the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District, according to applicable Minnesota Statutes. Both the City of Edina and the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority will be party to this agreement. Staff recommends approval of this Cost-Sharing Agreement and acceptance of the Permanent Public Easement. 1 189818v5 189818v6 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT TOWN HALL STATION THIS SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”); the CITY OF EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Edina HRA”); FREDERICK M. ALLIS, a single person, and JAMES. R. ALLIS, a single person (together “Owners”); and TOWN HALL STATION, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Tenant”). 1. BACKGROUND. A. Tenant and Owners have asked the City to approve a rezoning and redevelopment for the former Wally’s Service Station building located at 4500 Valley View Road (“Gas Station Parcel”), which is part of a 4-parcel shopping center legally described on the attached Exhibit “A” (hereinafter, collectively “Property”). 2 189818v5 189818v6 B. The City has approved the request via Resolution 2016-89 on October 5, 2016, subject to the completion of a cost-sharing agreement for the addition of certain public improvements. 2. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. While the Tenant is responsible for the overall improvements proposed for the site, the scope of this Agreement is limited to the Public Improvements described below. The Tenant shall construct, at its own expense, the following (hereinafter, collectively “Public Improvements”): A. The 6 foot wide public sidewalk located in the public right of way and in the public easement, including portions of retaining walls to transition the public sidewalk to the adjacent grade. B. Removal and replacement of curb, curb cuts and tactile pedestrian ramps associated with the public sidewalk. C. The removal of existing curb cuts that formerly provided vehicle access into the Gas Station Parcel and replacement with new curb that directs vehicle traffic into the remaining curb cuts that serve the adjacent shopping center. D. Public plaza, approximately 600 square feet at intersection of Wooddale and Valley View constructed with stamped concrete walking surface, arched Fond du Lac stone seating wall with cap and raised planting bed. E. Concrete pad for placement of Metro Transit bus stop bench (existing bench to be re-used). F. Public seating area at northeast corner, approximately 75 square feet constructed with stamped concrete walking surface and arched Fond du Lac stone seating wall with cap. 3 189818v5 189818v6 3. TENANT CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENT. Public Improvements constructed by the Tenant shall be installed in accordance with plans approved by the City in Resolution 2016-89 on October 5, 2016, and in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, regulations and policies. The Tenant shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Tenant shall instruct its engineer and/or contractor to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Tenant’s engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. The Tenant, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all reasonable instructions received from the City's inspectors and engineers. The Tenant’s engineer and/or contractor shall provide for on-site project management. The Tenant’s engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Tenant and the Tenant’s contractor. The Tenant or his engineer or contractor shall schedule pre-construction meetings as necessary to coordinate the work and to allow the City to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in good and workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No material deviations from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the City. The Tenant shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this Agreement unless such work is first ordered or agreed to in writing by the City Engineer. The Tenant shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits before beginning the work. 4. PUBLIC EASEMENT. The Owners shall execute an easement for public sidewalk and plaza purposes (“Easement”) over that area described and shown in Exhibit “B” and in a form attached as Exhibit “C”, with all appropriate consents by encumbrances, contemporaneous with this Agreement. The 4 189818v5 189818v6 total area of the public easement shall be approximately 1,878 square feet. 5. LICENSE. Tenant and Owners hereby grant the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development. 6. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Tenant shall be responsible for keeping streets within and adjacent to the Property clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from Tenant’s operation during the construction of the improvements. 7. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Tenant shall diligently complete the work required under this Agreement and, except for delays caused by Acts of God, as further defined herein, the Tenant shall complete the work by June 30th, 2017. An Act of God is an unusual, extraordinary and sudden manifestation of an event that could not under normal circumstances have been anticipated or expected. Ordinary weather conditions of normal intensity for the locality shall not be considered as an Act of God. The Tenant may, however, request a 3 month extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating any security required to be posted by the Tenant to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the City Engineer. 8. OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work under this Agreement and acceptance of the Public Improvements by the City, the Public Improvements shall become City property without further notice or action. 9. PAYMENT OF COSTS. A. Following the completion of the Public Improvements and acceptance by the City, the Edina HRA will reimburse the Tenant for the Costs of the Public Improvements in accordance with the cost-sharing plan shown in Exhibit “D”. For purposes of this paragraph “Costs” means 5 189818v5 189818v6 commercially reasonable and itemized out-of-pocket costs paid to third parties, including pro-rated allocations of contractor overhead & profit, general conditions, and insurance (not to exceed 15% of the reimbursable costs described above). “Costs” do not include: (1) in-house costs of the Tenant including, its employees and equipment, (2) payment to any entity in which the Tenant, or anyone who has an ownership interest in the Tenant, has an ownership interest, or (3) Tenant or contractor mark-up of actual costs. The Tenant must provide the Edina HRA itemized paid invoices and lien waivers before the Tenant will be reimbursed. The Edina HRA shall pay in full all bills properly submitted to it by the Tenant for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. B. The Tenant and Owners shall hold the City and the Edina HRA and their officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from work performed pursuant to this Agreement, unless those damages are the direct result of negligence on the part of the City or the Edina HRA. The Tenant and Owners shall indemnify the City and the Edina HRA and their officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City and the Edina HRA may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. C. In case of default or non-performance, the Tenant and Owners shall reimburse the City and the Edina HRA for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. 10. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Tenant’s obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Tenant and/or Owners sells, assigns, transfers or conveys one or more lots, the entire plat, or any 6 189818v5 189818v6 part of it. The Tenant shall notify the City when it sells, assigns, conveys or transfers any of its rights, title or interest in the site prior to the fulfillment or termination of this Agreement. B. Tenant shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the Public Improvements, commercial liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Tenant’s work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them in the performance of this Agreement. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $1,500,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,500,000 for each occurrence. The City and the Edina HRA shall both be named as additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Tenant shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to release of the site plan agreement for recording. C. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or Edina HRA under this Agreement. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. The action or inaction of the City or Edina HRA shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing and signed by the parties. The City’s or Edina HRA’s failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. F. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Property. In the event this Agreement is recorded, the City and the Edina HRA covenant to provide a 7 189818v5 189818v6 recordable Certificate of Completion promptly upon the completion of the work required herein. The Owners covenants with the City and its successors and assigns, that the Owners have fee title to the Property and/or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the Property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Property; and that the Owners will indemnify and hold the City and the Edina HRA harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. G. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to the City , at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. 11. TENANT’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Tenant as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, enter onto the Property and complete the Public Improvements. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the Property. 12. WARRANTY. The Tenant warrants all Public Improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Tenant shall submit either a warranty/maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the Public Improvements, or a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the original cost of these Public Improvements. The required warranty period for all Public Improvements, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, trees and perennial plantings, materials and equipment shall be one (1) year from the date of final written acceptance. 8 189818v5 189818v6 13. NOTICES. For purposes of this Agreement, the following individuals shall serve as the contacts for each party and notices to be provided under this Agreement shall be provided at the following addresses: CITY: City of Edina Attn: City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 EDINA HRA: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Attention: Executive Director Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 OWNERS: Frederick M. Allis 10005 Dell Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55437 TENANT: Town Hall Station, LLC c/o Town Hall Brewery 1430 Washington Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their proper officers on their behalf, pursuant to resolutions duly executed by their respective governing bodies. This Agreement is duly executed and effective on the last date written below. CITY OF EDINA Date: _____________________ By: _______________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor Date: _____________________ And: _______________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager 9 189818v5 189818v6 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT – TOWN HALL STATION CITY OF EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Date: _____________________ By: ______________________________________ James Hovland, Chair Date: _____________________ And: _____________________________________ Ann Swenson, Secretary 10 189818v5 189818v6 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT – TOWN HALL STATION TOWN HALL STATION, LLC Date: _____________________ By: Peter Rifakes, President 11 189818v5 189818v6 SIGNATURE PAGE FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT – TOWN HALL STATION OWNERS Date: _____________________ By: Frederick M. Allis Date: _____________________ And: James. R. Allis THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 210 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 Exhibit “A” to Site Improvement Performance Agreement 189818v5 189818v6 Exhibit “B” to Site Improvement Performance Agreement 189818v5 189818v6 Exhibit “C” to Site Improvement Performance Agreement 189818v5 189818v6 GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT FREDERICK M. ALLIS, a single person, and J. R. ALLIS, a single person, hereinafter referred to together as “Grantor”, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, its successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for sidewalk and public plaza purposes over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as described on the attached Exhibit "A" and depicted on the attached Exhibit “B”. INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon the easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, and maintain said public walkway systems over, across, on, under, and through the easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public sidewalk and plaza premises. The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement premises; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easement to the City; that there are no unrecorded interests in the easement premises; and that it will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this agreement this _______ day of _______________, 2016. Exhibit “C” to Site Improvement Performance Agreement 189818v5 189818v6 GRANTOR: By: Frederick M. Allis And: James. R. Allis STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF _____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___________________ day of __________________________, 2016, by FREDERICK M. ALLIS, a single person, and JAMES R. ALLIS, a single person. ___________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 210 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 Exhibit “C” to Site Improvement Performance Agreement 189818v5 189818v6 EXHIBIT “A” TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Exhibit “C” to Site Improvement Performance Agreement 189818v5 189818v6 EXHIBIT “B” TO GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT Exhibit “D” to Site Improvement Performance Agreement 189818v5 189818v6 Cost responsibility of work in ROW and public easement perennial planting bed or other landscaped areas in plaza, if applicable 50 sq ft quality inspection of City-funded work city Subtotal Cost in ROW and Public Easement engineering, design, proj management (NTE 15% of Construction) 15.0% contingency (5% of Cost) 5.0% Permitting (0.5% of Cost) 0.5% Total = ** Will require permanent public easement on public sidewalks and public plaza from land owner *** If trees need replacing, North of the bus stop, City of Edina / HRA will pay for replacements **** Depending on cost, retaining wall may be built with material other than lanon stone Exhibit “D” to Site Improvement Performance Agreement 189818v5 189818v6 189818v5 189818v6 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer/Tenant) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2______, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on September 30, 2017. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street. Edina Minnesota 55424 and is actually received by the City Manage at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Passenger Rail Service in Edina Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Provide guidance to staff and the transportation commission regarding the attached advisory communication. INTRODUCTION: Please recall that council added an item to the Edina Transportation Commission's (ETC) 2016 work plan regarding passenger rail service in Edina. The following three questions were asked: Should the City of Edina support further study of the possibility of passenger rail service in Edina? Should the City of Edina formally request the elimination of the so called “gag rule” concerning the Dan Patch line? Should the City of Edina dedicate staff and fiscal resources to developing a plan to encourage the development of passenger rail service in Edina? For this work plan item, the ETC was asked to "review and recommend" (Council Charge 3). The attached advisory communication -- prepared by members of the ETC -- is their initial response to these questions. As this advisory communication is in regards to a work plan item, it is placed in the Reports and Recommendations section on the council's agenda. A member of the ETC's Passenger Rail committee will be present to briefly present the advisory communication and to answer any questions the council may have. ATTACHMENTS: Description ETC Advisory Communication: Passenger Rail Work Plan Item Date: November 15, 2016 To: Mayor and City Council From: Transportation Commission Subject: Report on Passenger Rail Work Plan Item Action Requested: Direct staff to identify and City Council approves funding for initial public engagement process and professional support to study the possibility of rail transit on the Dan Patch/CP line. Situation: Earlier this year, the City Council directed the ETC to answer the following questions: • Should the City of Edina support further study of the possibility of passenger rail service in Edina? • Should the City of Edina formally request the elimination of the so called “gag rule” concerning the Dan Patch line? • Should the City of Edina dedicate staff and fiscal resources to developing a plan to encourage the development of passenger rail service in Edina? Background: The ETC formed a committee to formulate an approach to answering the questions. Committee members were Katherine Bass, Surya Iyer, Jennifer Janovy, and Ralf Loeffelholz. The ETC as a whole discussed pros and cons of potential answers to each question and identified multiple issues that require further investigation. At the October 27, 2016 ETC meeting, the ETC approved forwarding the ETC report on this work plan item to the City Council in the form of an advisory communication. Analysis: Below are our responses to each question posed by the Council. Should the City of Edina support further study of the possibility of passenger rail service in Edina? Interpretation: The ETC interpreted this question to refer only to the Dan Patch/CP rail line and study by the City of Edina. The ETC further interpreted this question to Page 2 refer only to transit service, with stops in Edina, and not to high speed passenger rail or commuter rail without stops in Edina. Recommendation: Yes, the City should support further study by the City of Edina of the possibility of rail transit service (such as DMU) on the Dan Patch/CP line. Discussion identified strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with pursuing rail transit service on the line. These require further investigation, a robust public engagement process, and professional advice from transit and rail experts. The ETC is advisory to the City Council. As volunteers, ETC members do not, as a rule, have the time or expertise to lead a public engagement process on this question or to conduct a professional investigation into the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats associated with this question. The ETC can support professional staff and consultants and provide guidance and feedback throughout the process. The ETC recommends that they move forward with this question as described in the proposed next steps below. The ETC recommends a project scope that includes robust public engagement and that carefully frames the question(s) so as not to lead to a pre- determined conclusion. The ETC recommends that this first step be concluded no later than the end of Q2 2017. Should the City of Edina formally request the elimination of the so called “gag rule” concerning the Dan Patch line? Recommendation: Not at this time. The ETC identified both opportunities and threats associated with requesting elimination of the gag rule. Both require further investigation. Should the City of Edina dedicate staff and fiscal resources to developing a plan to encourage the development of passenger rail service in Edina? Interpretation: This question asks specifically if resources should be dedicated to developing a plan to encourage the development of passenger rail service in Edina. Recommendation: Not at this time. While the ETC believes that resources should be dedicated to studying the possibility of Page 3 rail transit service on the Dan Patch/CP line, it is premature to say that the City should dedicate resources to developing a plan to encourage passenger rail service. More study is needed before this question can be answered. Recommendation: Proposed next steps: • Staff identifies and City Council approves funding for initial public engagement process and professional support to study the possibility of rail transit on the Dan Patch/CP line; • Staff, with input and guidance from the ETC, determines project scope and develops an RFP. • Consultants engaged by mid-Q1 2017, with process completed by end of Q2 2017. • Report answers questions 2 and 3. Page 4 G:\ENG\TRAN\ETC\Advisory Communications\2016\ETC Advisory Communication_Passenger Rail Service.docx Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2016-116 Accepting Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2016-116 Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2016-116 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Parks & Recreation – Art Center: Joel Carter Rock Sculpture Art Center Greer Garden Mary Koenke Fletcher Mat Cutter, Mat & Glass Cutter Art Center Supplies Michael Bedard Seven Tubes Acrylic Paint & One Tube Flow Art Center Supplies Improver Sam Lung Empty Wine Bottles Art Center Supplies Edina Police Department: Edina Crime Fund $3000.00 Dispatch Monitors Dated November 15, 2016 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 15, 2016, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Sketch Plan Review: 7711 Computer Avenue for DJR Architects Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is asked to provide informal, non-binding comment on a proposal to redevelop 7711 Computer Avenue. INTRODUCTION: See attached Planning Commission review memo. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Memo Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: VIII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve funding for Centennial Lakes Bridge Replacement Project Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve allocation of $740,000 of park dedication fees for the Centennial Lakes Park Bridge Replacement Project (CIP #17-003). INTRODUCTION: The City would like to use park dedication fees received from Opus Development to fund a Capitol Improvement Plan for the replacement of two pedestrian bridges. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Centennial Lakes Bridge Replacement Project Centennial Lakes Bridge Location & Replacement Concepts November 15, 2016 Mayor & City Council Scott Neal, City Manager Centennial Lakes Bridge Replacement Project Information / Background: If approved by the City Council, this motion will allocate $740,000 in park dedication fees recently received by the City from Opus Development to fund CIP Project #17-003, which is the replacement of two pedestrian bridges in Centennial Lakes Park. This project is currently unfunded in the proposed 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan. The allocation of funds for this project will insure that this project is able to be completed during the upcoming 24 months. The proposed allocation, $740,000, is sufficient to fund anticipated design, engineering and construction costs for the project. The timeline for the project includes 8 weeks for preparation of design and construction documents; 6 weeks for public bidding; 4 weeks for bid review and contract award; and 15 weeks of construction. If this motion is approved by the Council, staff will initiate the project design and bidding processes as early in 2017 as possible. Staff anticipate the start of construction immediately following the 2017 Fall Into The Arts event. Staff and Council have previously discussed the need and advisability for this project. Council has expressed a strong desire to staff to identify funding for the project. The City received the $1.2 park dedication fee from Opus last week. The funds are on hand and available for the project. I recommend the Council approve this motion and direct the project design and bidding processes to commence during the first quarter of 2017. Centennial Lakes Bridges Location & Replacement Concepts Centennial Lakes Bridges Location & Replacement Concepts Centennial Lakes Bridges Location & Replacement Concepts Centennial Lakes Bridges Location & Replacement Concepts Centennial Lakes Bridges Location & Replacement Concepts Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Receive Petition Requesting Alley Paving Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to receive the October 28, 2016 Petition requesting Alley Paving on Xerxes Avenue between 5900 and 5932, York Avenue South between 5901 and 5933 and West 60th Street between 3100 and 3116 INTRODUCTION: Patti Himes and Brian Haab circulated a petition among their neighbors asking for support of paving the alley behind their properties. The Council receives petitions and refers them to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. ATTACHMENTS: Description Petitioni Requesting Alley Paving The City Council City f Edina Petition Instructions This petition form is to be used to ask the Edina City Council to consider the following types of improvements: SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING WATER MAIN STORM SEWER PERMANENT STREET SU FACING WITH CU AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY (WITHOUT PERMANENT STREET SURFACING) SANITARY SEWER STREET LIGHTING or another improvement you describe (called OTHER on this form). You may use another petition forth if you wish but the city council may reject such petitions unless they contain the following information: I. Type of improvement(s) requested, e.g., SIDEWALK, STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, ETC. 2. Precise locations(s) of the requested improvements. 3. A statement that all who sign the petition understand that the city council may assess the costs of these improvements against the properties benefiting from the improvements in amounts determined by the Connell. 4. Printed name of property owner, owner's signature and phone number, and property address. 5. Signature of person circulating the petition. If you have questions, please call the City Clerk at 952-927-8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. DEBRA MANGEN CITY CLERK APRIL 2008 IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE 13108 W 60th St 3112 W 60th St OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) Brian Haab/Jennine McDonough Taylor Olstad PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 5905 York Ave S 5909 York Ave S Marilyn Cavara Chriostopher Weigle This petit' ai n citit i ated by: s---v_st4 4064e_c Ares Brca14E -302g koL11- 51- ADDRESS 61"?SPHONE City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX e (612) 927-5461 T41rD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL El SIDEWALK STORM SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY Ei ALLEY PAVING SANITARY SEWER PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER WATER MAIN STREET LIGHTING OTHER: To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. Xreir\(_ec Ate_ between LOCATION OF IMPR VEMENT BY STREET NAME e between LO R v ION F II ( V . I 2 PIrkVEIVLEN5BT 14 _STREET NAME between LOCATION WF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between -C-9 (90 ADDRESS 01 ADDRESS 3100 SS and and and S-93?Th DDRESS 3 3 ADDPU,SS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE 13100 W 60th St 5932 Xerxes Ave S Rental home Rental home atkir-ak pc_100,e,44:y Tracy Alger 13104 W 60th St 15913 York Ave S 5917,York Ave S [5929 York Ave S Katherine Hancock 5904! Xerxes Ave S Lori McGowan (9-7.,' Yi1C 16"74,--e--, ,,----, A#2.a.,;4„. blIz,L-7--"L_ALc A A,/ W.14&.0roiv,„----Ai- 5906 Xerxes Ave S Don/Jean Harlicker 5912 Xerxes Ave S Rick/Gail Jones 5910 Xerxes Ave S Christel Hutchinson 10.11:7401/ 592,0 Xerxes Ave S Raleigh Haugen ----,, i 59214 Xerxes Ave S Tom/Patti Hines 4 5928 Xerxes Ave S Clint/Lynn Reynolds ___-,..- ,,-_-- _--__ Rtese ca4 tto -they dod--i- Oarci-- prve_d tatey Joshua/Erin Edgar 5RW4e/kc/N-5, 3tn 60/41 NAME ADDRESS PHONE 6acal qc,-(?)-D--s-tra-X The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 15900 Xerxes Ave S 13116 W 60th St Stephane Cattelin ati1a5 l sib 15933 York Ave S Rental home Cynthia Ellwein circulated by: This 15921 York Ave S 15901 York Ave S Jeff/Cameran Carver new house -IAA °max `6se_ 01/14e_ 00N v-f.- hbov&- te,-) We are hoping to have the alley blacktopped. Do you agree to be assessed approximately $1500 for this? Address Name Signature Yes No 5900 Xerxes Ave S Stephane Cattelin 5904 Xerxes Ave S Lori McGowan Or. 5908 Xerxes Ave S Don/Jean Harlicker 5912 Xerxes Ave S Rick/Gail Jones ,. 5916 Xerxes Ave S Christel Hutchinson /4 — "-- oli.-3. 5920 Xerxes Ave S Raleigh Haugen 450": '..aritaiiiihre- vr 5924 Xerxes Ave S Tom/Patti Hines 14#7 1/- 5928 Xerxes Ave S Clint/Lynn Reynolds 5932 Xerxes Ave S Rental home 3100 W 60th St Rental home , 3104 W 60th St Cynthia Ellwein ' J.1.- .iii...111 1./. 3108 W 60th St Brian Haab/Jennine McDonough lov....pr2vam*.f, 4.....Arr 3112 W 60th St Taylor dIstad --t* Itiim. . 'ow'," 3116 W 60th St D.411(N t CIA,62,-, 5901 York Ave S Jeff/Cameran Carver f /,,, -;, 5905 York Ave S Marilyn Cavara \---,-f, ‘( bLi_. 5909 York Ave S Chriostopher Weigle 5913 York Ave S Tracy Alger (-6:Y7 6 t, r ' ---L- 5917 York Ave S Joshua/Erin Edgar .. , 1./--- 5921 York Ave S new house —WA occuipt..41 5925 York Ave S J.C. Compagnon ' re., poyLce, . 5929 York Ave S Katherine Hancock 1 5933 York Ave S Rental home Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: IX.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: Attached is the correspondence received since the last City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondence through 2016-11-04noon Correspondence through 2016-11-10noon Correspondence through 2016-11-15noon From:jennysaxton93@gmail.com To:Edina Mail Cc:Jenny Saxton Subject:City Council and Engineering - Countryside G Roadway Construction Date:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 3:35:24 PM Hello, I just received the Notice of Public Hearing of Roadway Improvements for Countryside G neighborhood and have a few questions prior to the November 15 hearning. Currently, the proposed assessment per lot is estimated at $14,766. However, it seems like the proposed work greatly varies per street and the assessment is excessive for the limited work being done on Sherman Circle. One of the items listed is unnecessary and ridiculous as noted below. Currently, the Staff recommendations to City Council for Sherman Circle are: - Two sided parking on Sherman Circle – We already have parking on both sides of Sherman Circle as it’s a residential street. How will this change? - Only spot repairs for curb and gutter - Sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main spot repairs and upgrades. These are three items from a six-item list that notes possible improvements to Sherman Circle…..two of which are negligible and unnecessary. As other streets are being narrowed, adding sidewalks, gaining new curbs and gutters, and adding parking, it is unreasonable to propose the same assessments for this street. I know the plans and engineering study will be available on November 4, but I would like to hear about the assessment allocation individually. I can be reached at 612-203-0758. Thank you, Jenny Saxton From:Common Sense Edina To:James Hovland; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:Scott H. Neal Subject:Common Sense for Edina - City of Edina web site is down Date:Tuesday, November 01, 2016 2:56:42 PM Any idea when the city of Edina web site will be back up? The city should communicate viaemail or social media sites like Nextdoor.com when there are technical issues with city technology.I am hoping the city of Edina web site was not taken down because of pending litigation if so the city is getting very poor legal advice and being so close to an election could cause otherlegal issues. David Frenkel From:Ken Rush To:Edina Mail Subject:Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Date:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 8:29:54 PM *** Attention City Council and Engineering *** Dear Mayor, Council Members and Engineering Director, As I will be out-of-town on November 15th I will be unable to attend the public hearing at the Council meeting scheduled for that evening. I would appreciate your review and consideration of this email as you prepare to take action on the proposed Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. I would like to bring your attention to what I perceive as a current vehicular/pedestrian safety problem about to be made even worse with the pending construction of a sidewalk along Olinger Road during the planned street reconstruction in our neighborhood in 2017. There is currently a marked and signed pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of Olinger Road and Olinger Boulevard that is supposed to allow safe pedestrian passage to and from Bredesen Park. I have observed many instances of motor vehicles NOT yielding to pedestrians waiting to cross Olinger Boulevard and even instances off vehicles ignoring pedestrians whom are already in the intersection! There is no pedestrian crossing at Olinger Road and Vernon Avenue. People young and old risk their lives daily attempting to safely cross Vernon Avenue which is a two-lane C.S.A.H. with a posted speed limit of 40 m.p.h. There are no marked turn lanes at this intersection, but vehicles frequently form into two lanes of congested traffic going in each direction through this intersection, severely limiting vision. The addition of a sidewalk along Olinger Road will only entice more people to attempt a crossing at this already unsafe intersection on their journeys to connect with the walking and nature paths at Bredesen Park. I believe it would be highly unlikely for the County to signalize this intersection in the future because of the close proximity to the signalized intersection at Olinger Boulevard/Blake Road at Vernon Avenue. A much safer option for crossing Vernon Avenue already exist! The signalized and marked crossing at Olinger Boulevard/Blake Road at Vernon Avenue provides direct access to Bredesen Park for pedestrians and cyclists. This intersection already has pedestrian sidewalks and bicycle paths in place on both sides of Vernon Avenue connecting directly to the Highlands and Parkwood Knolls neighborhoods to the north of Vernon Avenue. I am not a traffic engineer nor do I profess to be one. However, having lived on Olinger Road since the 1940’s I have witnessed well thought out and planned urbanization of our neighborhood. I would not use those same adjectives to describe the planned sidewalk for Olinger Road. DO NOT PUT A SIDEWALK ON OLINGER ROAD! · It is not needed as a safe crossing of Vernon Avenue is already in place with the signalized intersection at Olinger Boulevard/Blake Road and Vernon Avenue. · It would likely swell the number of pedestrians who become “targets” as they attempt to cross Olinger Boulevard at the existing limited-sightlines crosswalk at Olinger Road. Respectfully submitted, Kenneth Rush 5801 Olinger Road Edina From:google-my-business-noreply@google.com To:edina-police-de-5935@pages.plusgoogle.com Subject:Fengtong just left a review for Edina Police Department on Google My Business Date:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 10:17:28 AM Edina Police Department You just got a 1-star review “please respect minority people” – Fengtong Hou Read review This review hasn't been approved yet and may be removed from your page. Learn more about review policies. Contact Us Visit our Help Center Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043Unsubscribe from these emails. From:Mayors Innovation Project, Satya Rhodes-Conway To:James Hovland Subject:Funding Infrastructure: Good Ideas for Cities & Winter Meeting Topic Date:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 5:44:34 PM Click to view this email in a browser Mayors Innovation Project Funding Infrastructure Good Ideas for Cities & Winter 2017 Meeting Topic January 17, 2017 in Washington, DC Looking for creative strategies to help build your city? Join your peers at the Winter 2017 Meeting, January 17 in DC to explore the best ideas being implemented around the country! As an introduction to the topic, we hope you'll join us for our webinar on green revolving funds and city infrastructure data tracking. Many cities are grappling with how to finance city infrastructure projects and meet carbon-reduction goals when funds are scarce. On this call we’ll explore an innovative approach to this problem: green revolving funds. The City of San Antonio’s green revolving fund has financed numerous projects that provide both energy and cost savings. The City uses an intuitive web platform, GRITS, to track and manage these energy-efficiency projects: Webinar Green Revolving Funds and City Infrastructure Data Tracking November 12, 3pm Eastern, Register here Presenters will include Golda Obinzu, Energy Manager for the City of San Antonio, and Mark Orlowski, Executive Director of the Sustainable Endowments Institute. Questions? Contact James at jirwin@mayorsinnovation.org. Read on for other good ideas happening in cities on the topic of funding infrastructure, and don't forget to join us in January: Green Bonds take root in the U.S. municipal bond market The Avenue, Brookings Institute The massive municipal bond market is extremely attractive to investors About Our Meetings "Mayors Innovation Project is a great opportunity to meet, learn from, and swap ideas with mayors and other leaders from other progressive cities." - Mayor Suzanne Jones Boulder, CO Interested in Behavioral Science? Join our new partnership! We’re launching a cohort of cities interested in working with Harvard’s Behavioral Insights Group (BIG) to develop and test innovative behavioral approaches to city problems. Learn more on our first webinar: Wednesday, November 9 3pm Eastern Click here to register. New to the Mayors Innovation Project? Welcome! We are a non-profit, non-partisan learning network of American mayors committed to “high road” policy and governance: shared prosperity, environmental sustainability, and efficient democratic government. Learn more. and represents an enormous opportunity to fund climate-focused infrastructure projects. Green Bond issuance was up 57% last year and is on track to exceed that pace in 2016. Putting Underinvested Communities on Big Investors’ Radar Equity Factor, Next City A recent restructuring of the CDFI program has opened access to the bond market, allowing longer-term investments and lower rates. Mayors Innovation Project www.mayorsinnovation.org info@mayorsinnovation.org If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the followinglink: Unsubscribe Click here to forward this email to a friend Mayors Innovation Project 1180 Observatory DriveSuite 7122Madison, WI 53706US Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy. From:Don Heideman To:Edina Mail Subject:Fwd: Lt. T.F Olson Date:Tuesday, November 01, 2016 10:18:45 PM So let me try this again... Clearly you either don't value my opinion whatsoever, or you have been completelyoverwhelmed with negative feedback on this officer and his egregious offense and simply cannot respond to all of it. Either way, I want you to know that my emails will not stop untilthis officer is fired. Now, in addition to his horrible lack of judgment (or blatant racism) and your further lack ofjudgment (or blatant support of racism) you are faced with a lawsuit that could and probably will cost taxpayers tens (or hundreds) of thousands of dollars.Once again...I am requesting a response my my email. Thank you, Don Heideman Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Don Heideman <donheideman@gmail.com>Date: October 15, 2016 at 5:03:54 PM CDT To: Mail@EdinaMN.govSubject: Lt. T.F Olson I simply don't know where to begin. This officer should be fired immediately, and brought up on charges of assault! I'm white. I'm middle age. And I've HADIT! This police officer and those like him are going to completely ruin every persons opinion and relationship with law enforcement in our country. I cannot, asa member of this community, sit quietly by while these egregious, racist assaults continue.I expect a reply from a representative of the Edina Police Department. If I do not receive a reply, I will continue to reach out by email, phone or in person until Ido. Don Heideman 763-443-5482 Sent from my iPhone Oasis for Youth is a vital community asset empowering all youth at risk of homelessness to believe in bright futures filled with hope, stability and self-fulfillment. WWW.GIVEMN.ORG From:Oasis for YouthTo:Edina MailSubject:Give to the Max Day - Nov. 17Date:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 9:00:04 AM Thank you for being part of the Oasis for Youth community. Each year, generous supporters like you celebrateGive to the Max Day by making your onlinedonation on GiveMN.org. Your generosity on thisday makes a difference far beyond the 24-hourgiving event. Please join us on November 17,2016, for Give to the Max Day and change liveswith Oasis for Youth. This year, all gifts will be matcheddollar for dollar up to $20,000. Your donation may also help us receive anadditional $1,000 or even $10,000. How? OnNovember 17, every gift made on GiveMN.org willbe entered into an hourly drawing for $1,000 plusthere will be two random drawings for $10,000. The more gifts we generate on GiveMN.org duringGive to the Max Day, the more our chancesincrease to receive that additional $10,000donation. Imagine what we could do with $10,000! That's right, The Scheduled Giving period for Give to the Max Day 2016 is underway! All gifts made using GiveMN.org through November 16 will be scheduled to process on November 17, making those donations eligible for all Give to the Max Day prizes! Oasis for Youth will serve more than 300 youth this year and we need your support to make it happen. If you would like to make an impact on youth homelessness right here in your community, please click to donate. You don't needto wait -schedule yourdonation now byclicking here! GiveMN.org Copyright © 2016 OASIS FOR YOUTH, All rights reserved. You are receiving this newsletter to keep you informed about Oasis activities. Our mailing address is: Oasis for Youth 2200 W. Old Shakopee Rd Bloomington, MN 55431 Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list This email was sent to edinamail@ci.edina.mn.us why did I get this? unsubscribe from this list update subscription preferences Oasis for Youth · 2200 W. Old Shakopee Rd · Bloomington, MN 55431 · USA From:Superintendent To:James Hovland; Scott H. Neal; Lori A. Syverson (lori@edina.org) Subject:National Merit Scholars Reception, November 14, 5:45 p.m. Date:Tuesday, November 01, 2016 10:44:56 AM Attachments:PROGRAM_FINAL.pdf Greetings! We are pleased to invite you to attend a brief reception honoring Edina Public Schools’ National Merit Scholars, their parents or guardians, and the educators who have made a difference in their lives. Attached is a copy of the evening’s program, which contains a list of those students to be honored. The reception will take place as follows: Monday, November 14 5:45 – 7:00 p.m. (Light refreshments will be served; program begins at 6:00 p.m.; guests are encouraged to remain and visit after the program) Edina Community Center Auditorium (Enter through Normandale Elementary’s north entrance) Please RSVP to my assistant Sarah Schandle (sarah.schandle@edinaschools.org, 952-848-4000), and feel free to contact her with any questions. Warm regards, Ric Dressen Superintendent If the information in this email relates to an individual, it may be private data under state or federal privacy laws. This individual private data should not be reviewed, distributed, or copied by any person other than the intended recipient(s), unless otherwise permitted under law. If you are not the intended recipient, any further review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this electronic communication or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received an electronic communication in error, you should immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system. Thank you for your compliance. Lisa Abascal LarsonEva AndersonCaroline HarmeningThomas JiangAmy MaSukriti RawalJacob SnyderMeredith SongOwen StidmanMichael TangYutong XuJulie YuanZachary ZamoffBeining Zhang National Merit Semifinalists Anne AmenSamantha AusmanAsa BowenBenjamin BrandtEmily BuenzConnie ChaoYang DengRosalind EastaughBrendan FloodAnna GoldsteinAshley GoodenMaxwell HarrellJohn HoranNicolas IskosMeghana IyerGeorge JarvinenHenry JunkerJohn KeenanCatherine KuehlClara LarsonJada LeeRomi LeeCaelan MaitlandMollie MertesZachary MillerPaul ReadyLydia ReinerMichael RodriguezAllison SchwobodaHechen ShenNatalie StenmanHelena SverakLiam ThompsonRyan ThompsonMacLeod Wright National Merit Commended Scholars NATIONAL MERITEDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS November 14, 2016 5:45 p.m. Refreshments 6 p.m. Program begins Welcome from district leaders Welcome from community leaders Awarding of certificates Welcome to the 2016 Edina Public Schools National Merit Reception! From:Huggett, Jeff To:James Hovland; Scott H. Neal Cc:Huggett, Jeff Subject:Notice of Public Hearing: Amended QAP"s 2017-2018 Date:Friday, October 28, 2016 5:04:33 PM Attachments:image001.pngimage002.pngimage003.pngimage004.pngimage005.pngimage006.pngimage007.pngimage009.pngMHFA 2017 QAP Changes Executive Summary.docxDRAFT Letter to MHFA from SLP Mayor.docxContact List - Notice of Public Hearing.docx Jim and Scott, I have left you each VMs on the information below and attached. Minnesota Housing is proposing some dramatic changes to the 4% tax credits for affordable rental housing. These changes would severely limit Edina’s ability to create new affordable rental housing in our community per our affordable housing policy. We are planning to make comments in opposition of the proposed changes and wanted to make sure other stakeholders were aware in case they wanted to do the same. We believe this is not only a bad policy change, but it will severely impact the ability of communities to set their own affordable housing policies and do economic development through affordable housing in a way the community wants to see done, versus what Minnesota Housing thinks should be done. Please feel free to share this information with city council members, the Regional Council of Mayors and any others you deem appropriate. Part of the attachments above include people you might want to contact with your concerns over this policy change. I am happy to discuss this in more detail with either or both of you if you have any questions. Jeff If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online. Notice of Public Hearing: Amended 2017 and 2018 Housing Tax Credit Qualified Allocation Plans Share this: Minnesota Housing is amending the 2017 and 2018 Qualified Allocation Plans. The Minnesota Housing Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) is our plan for the distribution of Low-Income HousingTax Credits. It combines state and federally legislated priorities and other Minnesota Housingpriorities. During this comment period for the Amended 2017 and 2018 QAPs, you may: View a description of proposed changes. Submit a pre-application for determination of 4% tax credit eligibility. You will receive additional details about the pre-application process on Tuesday, November 1. Provide comments at a public hearing on Wednesday, November 16 from 10:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. at Minnesota Housing. Submit written comments to mn.housing@state.mn.us or by mail to Minnesota Housing, attn: Tamara Wilson, 400 Sibley Street, Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55101. Written comments must be received by 12:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 16. Questions? Contact Tamara Wilson. Jeffrey R. Huggett Vice President and Project PartnerDevelopment & AcquisitionsDominium 2905 Northwest Blvd. Suite 150 Plymouth, MN 55441 Phone 763-354-5605 Mobile 612-817-0797 DominiumApartments.com This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com Attachment MHFA 2017 QAP Changes Executive Summary.docx (15437 Bytes) cannot be converted to PDF format. Attachment DRAFT Letter to MHFA from SLP Mayor.docx (104491 Bytes) cannot be converted to PDF format. Attachment Contact List - Notice of Public Hearing.docx (14445 Bytes) cannot be converted to PDF format. From:caroline paulson To:Edina Mail Subject:Police Harrassment of black citizens Date:Monday, October 31, 2016 12:21:20 PM I saw the video of your WHITE police officier arresting a black man for the CRIME of walking around construction blocking the sidewalk. I would like to know if proper apologies have been made to him, or are you just another white suburb looking to keep all minorities far away. From:Ann Swenson To:James Hovland Subject:Re: Feedback on Recent Police Incident Date:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 1:47:54 PM Thanks for your view point. As a council we cannot dismiss the citations. The officer and city prosecutor make that decision. I agree that as a council we could have done a better job withour comments. Personally I was not anticipating speaking since normally we just take public comment under advisement. I did not apologize nor will I. I thought our officer followedprocedure properly and showed great restraint. The comments from our residents were the only ones that meant anything to me. Ann Swenson Sent from my iPhone On Nov 1, 2016, at 4:07 PM, James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: <image001.gif>Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov From: Dave Melander [mailto:davemelander@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 3:50 PMTo: James HovlandSubject: Feedback on Recent Police Incident Mayor Hovland - There has been a tremendous amount of feedback surrounding the individual recently stopped on Xerxes Ave in mid-October. My perspective has little to do with the incident directly, but rather with how city officials handled the situation. I believe this case, like any other, should follow standard judicial process which requires gathering the relevant facts and allowing the system to determine the appropriate outcome (innocent until proven guilty). Unfortunately, what I heard at the city council meeting following the incident does not seem to align with that approach. Apologies were given for the officer’s conduct, police behavior was called “disturbing”, and the citation was quickly dismissed. While I could be supportive of these actions, they should be made only after the appropriate evidence is gathered and reviewed. It appears as if the council apologized before there was a chance to thoroughly review and discern the entire storyline. I am concerned about how that quick reaction reflects on the community, police department, as well as how it may be used as evidence in any potential litigation. Furthermore, the more information that is shared with the public, the less it appears that the individual’s rights were violated. From an outsider's view, the police officer appears to be the one owed an apology. I completely understand that this is a complicated and sensitive situation with far- reaching implications. Given that importance, in the future, I hope that city council will use patience and gather the appropriate facts prior to either condemning or condoning police conduct. Regards, Dave Melander (4443 Garrison Lane) From:Ann Swenson To:James Hovland Subject:Re: Rob Little - Resident of Edina Date:Thursday, November 03, 2016 4:21:22 PM We do strongly support our police. Ann Sent from my iPad > On Nov 3, 2016, at 3:58 PM, James Hovland <JHovland@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: > > > > Lynette Biunno, Receptionist > 952-927-8861 | Fax 952-826-0389 > lbiunno@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Little [mailto:rlittle@nbs-inc.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 2:06 PM > To: James Hovland > Cc: Heather Little > Subject: Rob Little - Resident of Edina > > Jim - > > I am emailing you to let you know that I support the Edina Police and the way the Edina officer handled the Xerxes Avenue event. That officer showed incredible restraint and professionalism. I saw that the man who was walking in the street is now filing a lawsuit against Edina. Do not settle this case. I do not care how much it costs the city of Edina in lawyer fees. If Edina settles, it will encourage more incidents and more lawsuits. I expect the city counsel to fully support the Edina police and expect the city counsel to vigorously defend in court the Edina Police and the reputation of Edina as a community. If you want to discuss further, you can call my cell at 612-408- 4522. Thank you for your good work and support Edina and its police department! > > Rob Little > 5012 Arden Avenue From:Swenty, Sarah L. Subject:SBA Now Accepting 2017 Small Business Week Award Nominations Date:Thursday, November 03, 2016 8:58:26 AM Attachments:image003.png Please help us spread the word to businesses in your area by sharing the news release below. We’d welcome the opportunity to celebrate businesses you love and have worked with during the 2017 Small Business Week. Best, Sarah Swenty Public Affairs Specialist Small Business Administration Minnesota District Office Facebook| @SBAGreatLakes| @SBAgov| News Release MINNESOTA DISTRICT OFFICE Release Date: November 3, 2016 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE SBA Now Accepting 2017 Small Business Week Award Nominations MINNEAPOLIS – The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is now accepting nominations for its 2017 National Small Business Week Awards, including the annual Small Business Person of the Year. Since 1963, National Small Business Week has recognized the outstanding achievements of America’s small businesses for their contributions to their local communities, and to our nation’s economy. SBA Awards given at the national level include the following: Small Business Person of the Year Exporter of the Year Phoenix Awards for Disaster Recovery Phoenix Award for Small Business Disaster Recovery Phoenix Award for Outstanding Contributions to Disaster Recovery, Public Official Phoenix Award for Outstanding Contributions to Disaster Recovery, Volunteer Federal Procurement Awards Small Business Prime Contractor of the Year Small Business Subcontractor of the Year Dwight D. Eisenhower Awards for Excellence (for large prime contractors who use small businesses as suppliers and contractors) 8(a) Graduate of the Year Jody C. Raskind Lender of the Year Small Business Investment Company of the Year Awards to SBA Resource Partners Small Business Development Center (SBDC) Excellence and Innovation Center Award Women’s Business Center of Excellence Award Veterans Business Outreach Center of the Year Information on all the national awards and instructions for applying can be found at https://www.sba.gov/nsbw/nsbw. Each year the SBA’s Minnesota District Office participates in National Small Business Week by recognizing outstanding local small business owners and those who help them start and grow their businesses. The SBA Minnesota District Office will recognize individuals and businesses in the following categories: · Encore Entrepreneur · Family-Owned Business · Minority Champion · Minority-Owned Small Business · Veteran-Owned Small Business · Veteran Champion · Women-Owned Small Business · Women in Business Champion · Young Entrepreneur Details on who qualifies for each award and how to apply can be found at https://www.sba.gov/content/minnesota-small-business-week-awards. For tips on how to submit a winning nomination, visit https://www.sba.gov/blogs/how-submit- winning-national-small-business-week-award-nomination. All nominations must be submitted by Monday, Jan. 10, 2017. All awards, both local and national, will be given in celebration of National Small Business Week, April 30 – May 6, 2017. # # # About the Small Business Administration The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) was created in 1953 and since January 13, 2012 has served as a Cabinet-level agency of the federal government to aid, counsel, assist and protect the interests of small business concerns, to preserve free competitive enterprise and to maintain and strengthen the overall economy of our nation. The SBA helps Americans start, build and grow businesses. Through an extensive network of field offices and partnerships with public and private organizations, the SBA delivers its services to people throughout the United States, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam. http://www.sba.gov/mn From:Marty Scott To:James Hovland Subject:Support for our Officers Date:Wednesday, November 02, 2016 7:48:24 AM As a Police Officer of 23+ years, this morning is yet another day of grief, mourning, anger, frustration and uncertainty for the future of the support for the men and women who go towork daily, putting their lives on the line...many times for people who care so little. The Officers that were slain in Iowa last night had families, friends, partners.... I have never met you, Sir. You may be a good person. But I did watch the Council meetingyou held after the Lt Olson incident. In 23 years of service, I have never been more infuriated and disappointed in government as I was while watching the spineless and gutless pandering you and the council laid out thatnight. You had a great opportunity to show support for your officers and point out that the actions of Mr Thomas is what created the civil unrest. Law Enforcement has had to listen to Governor Dayton make the statement ' If he (JamarClark) was white, he'd still be alive today" while knowing ZERO facts. The best explanation I can think of for the lack of support offered by Gov Dayton and your council is the fact you are in fear of what these homeland terrorist groups could do tojeopardize you and your families. They could cause a real inconvenience in your life if you upset them or stood up to their "demands" It's much easier to throw the cops under the bus,isn't it? I held off writing this letter but after last night's assassination on our public servants, I believe this to be the right time. If you are ever in my city and call on my service, possibly a medical situation, or to protectyou from harm, I will come running to help you...no matter how I feel about you or your character. I guess that is what sets me (the Police) apart from the terrorist groups you justbought into. Take care and may God bless you. A Neighboring Officer. From:Rob Lieving To:Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonann1@gmail.com Cc:rep.frank.hornstein@house.mn Subject:Tim Phillips Date:Tuesday, November 01, 2016 10:02:11 AM Dear Edina City Council: I just watched the profoundly disturbing video of the needless confrontation between Edinacity employee Lt. Tim Olson and Larnie Thomas. As a citizen of the state of Minnesota, I cannot believe that a policeman in 2016 would stop a person for walking in the street around a construction site. As a person who has many AfricanAmerican friends and African American family members, I am alarmed that Edina is not a welcoming city for all people. The attached video only confirms my worst fears about theEdina police. As elected officials, we entrust you to protect the civil rights of all citizens. Clearly, an error was made in this case. I hope that Edina will do the right thing and make sure correctiveaction is taken against this officer and any other officer engaged in behavior as shown on this video. I would also like to understand what Edina has learned from this event and how the city willrespond in the future. http://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/10/31/larnie-thomas-sues-edina-cop-in-arrest-after- controversial-stop Regards, Rob LievingSW Minneapolis Resident --- rob@lieving.com612.326.4305 From:Kim Carter To:Edina Mail Subject:West 70th 9 Mile Creek Trail Date:Saturday, October 29, 2016 2:00:38 PM Hello, My husband and I live at 5220 West 70th, directly across from the new 9 Mile Creek trail path on West 70th. As part of the process of building the trail, 90% of the trees and bushes directly across from our house have been removed. These trees blocked the unsightly appearance of a blue building (7100 Ohms Lane) that contains, among other things, a baseball batting cage and crematorium. By removal of these trees, not only is the ascetic of the trail on 70th unappealing, we residents are now left with a constant view of this building and people coming in and out of the baseball batting cages at all hours, which is extremely disruptive. We are appealing to the City in hopes that foliage or trees could be added to the landscaping. I've corresponded with Jason McGrew-King of the Three Rivers Park District to no avail and am hoping the City can step in and assist. Your response to this matter is appreciated. Kim and Adam Gillick 612-306-6794 -- Thanks! Kim Gillick From:CNS Minneapolis To:James Hovland Subject:thomas v city of edina Date:Monday, October 31, 2016 10:46:25 PM Hello Mayor Hovland, My name is Dionne Cordell-Whitney, and I'm a news reporter for Courthouse News Service. I'm writing a story on the recent filing by Larnie Thomas against the City of Edina and police officer Tim Olson. I was hoping you could provide me with a statement regarding Mr. Thomas' citation and the incident between Mr. Thomas and Officer Olson. Thank you for your time. Dw Dionne Cordell-Whitney Courthouse News Service 612-708-4964 minneapolis@courthousenews.com From:Alan Benson To:Edina Mail Subject:Attn City Council and Engineering Date:Saturday, November 05, 2016 9:56:43 PM Dear City Council, We are residents at 5910 Olinger Rd, and we are writing to oppose the proposed roadway reconstruction in Countryside G. To us, with the exception of the item of repaving the street, the proposal represents a clear imposition of a private cost for (ostensibly) a public gain. The proposal would have our household pay an estimated $14,766 for items that include a narrowing of our street (which we don't want), parking on our street (which we don't want), a sidewalk (which we don't want), and other changes. To be absolutely clear-- *we do not want any of these changes*. That we would have to bear the cost of these projects is especially disturbing, as is the statement that our property "is considered to be benefited by the improvement." Clearly, these changes are for meant people who want to drive to Bredesen park, and not us. Finally, we question what exactly the problem is that these changes would solve. In our time here, we haven't seen any evidence that parking or walking is unsafe, or that the lack of sidewalks or designated parking has discouraged parkgoers or pedestrians. To summarize, we see the proposal as the imposition of a private cost to address a public problem that does not exist. If the Council decides that it wants to make any of these changes on behalf of the broader public, then know that this household is still made worse off for the changes, and we think it's unjust that we would have to pay for it instead of the intended beneficiaries. Alan Benson and Xiaoyu Gu From:Ramaiah Muthyala To:Edina Mail Subject:information Date:Monday, November 07, 2016 6:02:11 AM Attachments:image.png Draft Schedule INDO US 11.02.16.docx Rare Disease Flyer final9.pdf Mr. James Hovland:Mayor, City of Edina Dear Mr. Hovland. A few months ago we met in SV temple.I thought you or City of Edina residents may be interested in attending this conference (free registration). This is about rare diseases and orphan drugs - 8% of all US citizens getaffected . Yet very little awareness! The rare must become common. It is important to raise the awareness of rare diseases if the high cost of orphan products, is to be brought down, thedelayed diagnosis is to be speeded up. Public universities create new knowledge but they must also bring that knowledge beyond the obvious. Working with partners with outside theuniversity, country and nation accelerate our inventions to public good throughout the world. INDO_US rare diseases conference is put together in partnership with Indian Consulate General, Chicago and the College of Pharmacy. To the best of my knowledge, this is the firsttime Government of India ever partnered with NGO. This is a unique opportunity for us to let rare diseases population in both countries to know the significance of the event thereby 30million US and 90 million Indian rare diseases community feel that their voice is heard. At least that what I hope to achieve. It is open to all - Indians, Americans, all nationality Note, it does not cost anything to you. Your participation is appreciated. President/CEO Indian Organization for Rare Diseases Ramaiah Muthyala, Ph.D., Ph.D., M.B.A., FRSC Associate Director, Center for Orphan Drug Development Associate Professor, Department of Medicinal Chemistry Adjunct Professor, Department of Medicine Associate Professor, Department of Experimental Clinical Pharmacology University of Minnesota 2001 6thSt SE Minneapolis, MN 55455 ph: 612-624-7120 fax:612-626-9985 email: muthy003@umn.edu http://www.pharmacy.umn.edu/faculty/muthyala_ramaiah/home.html for registration: http://view.ecommunications2.umn.edu/?qs=06c048ddf305becb1d9625498128f36785554b771fcdbff2718257eafa5cdfbc5bc22a0956600eedecab72e05fe975f7fa5edd09d756e2aa8067824f16a21ba2e2c68fcb848eddb8 The program is attached. If you have any questions and comments please let me know. I will do my best toanswer. Ramaiah INDO-US RARE DISEASE C ONF ERE NCE SPEAKERLINEUP FREEREGISTRATIONINCLUDESBREAKFASTANDLUNCH This event will bring together patients, care-givers, practitioners, researchers and students in a first of its kind conference! This conference is sponsored by the Indian Consulate General-Chicago, the University of Minnesota Institute of Translational Neuroscience, Indian organization for Rare Diseases, the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, the Center for Orphan Drug Research Global Programs and Strategy Alliance, University of Minnesota Academic Health Center, University of Minnesota and the University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy. Featuring nationally-known healthcare professionals and organizations to speak at this event. DAS Consul General of India, Chicago USSRJ Wisconsin AND MORE... LEARN MORE & REGISTER @ Z.UMN.EDU/INDOUS Initiate basic research and orphan drug development collaborationsEmphasize the important role of India in the global public health policy Raise the awareness of rare diseases OBJECTIVES (Subject to Change) DMS Dean, University of MN College of Pharmacy USREP 3rd Congressional District, Minnesota From:Lisa HornTo:jhovland@hovlandrasmus.com; James Hovland Cc:Patty Schulz; Lisa HornSubject:VEAP Mortgage Pay Off Case StatementDate:Monday, November 07, 2016 9:10:44 AM Attachments:image003.pngimage004.pngVEAP Mortgage and Loan Payoff Impact FINAL.pdf Good morning, Mayor Hovland It was so great to see you last week at the Rotary luncheon. I mentioned having crafted a case statement to outline the mortgage and benefits of a donation to VEAP to eliminate this debt. My hope is that this information is helpful as we continue to make the case for support in the months ahead. If you see any areas that could or should be changed, please let me know and I will make the amendments. I am grateful for your remarkable, community-focused leadership, for your commitment in VEAP and for inspiring HOPE in everyone around you! Continue to shine! Lisa Lisa Horn | CEO | Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People | 9600 Aldrich Avenue South ￜ Bloomington, MN 55420 | 952.955.8312 | VEAP.org | Meeting Basic Needs. Building Stronger Communities. Donate: Make a donation here Register for the Gala here! November 18, 2016 Hyatt Regency Bloomington, Minneapolis South 6:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. VEAP Mortgage and Loan Payoff Impact Community need for VEAP: VEAP was founded in 1973 by members of 13 Richfield congregations who witnessed the deteriorating living conditions of low-income families and seniors in their community. Since then, the organization has grown to include four pillar programs that provide access to healthy food, social services, transportation and resources for children and youth. The financial crisis of 2008 had a dramatic impact on individuals in all income brackets, however, it was particularly devastating for the working poor. Individuals working in low paying hospitality and retail jobs were immediately impacted through job loss. With little financial cushion, they soon found themselves facing financial crisis and unable to pay rent, buy food and medication and meet basic needs for themselves and their families. Many people who had been gainfully employed also faced financial insecurity and for the first time in their lives, needed food and housing support. The increased demand for VEAP services was sudden and significant. Clients waited 5-7 days for a food pantry appointment and thousands of emergency food packs were distributed to help families during the appointment wait time. While food was eventually provided, to regain financial stability clients needed access to other resources. The cramped quarters of VEAP’s building at 9728 Irving provided no privacy for VEAP social workers to meet with clients, making it nearly impossible to address client needs in a confidential, dignified manner. In 2011, as the recession continued, the VEAP Board of Directors decided that in order to meet the community need for VEAP programs, it needed a larger facility. VEAP Service Center: In January 2012, VEAP purchased a 50,000 square foot, vacant building at 9600 Aldrich Avenue South in Bloomington. The building needed substantial renovations and new roof, HVAC, sewer, fiber optic cable, windows, insulation and other amenities were added. Throughout the course of the renovation, VEAP conducted the Our Next Chapter capacity campaign to cover the cost of the construction. The campaign raised $1,600,000 through gifts and pledges toward the remodeling costs of approximately $6,000,000. Building Purchase and Renovation $6,000,000 Our Next Chapter capacity campaign $1,600,000 Sale of 9731 James Avenue property $500,000 Remaining Obligation $4,100,000 VEAP’s vision for the new building was to create a service hub where clients would have access to multiple services in a single location. Hennepin County Public Health and Human Services Department (HSPHD) entered into a 10-year lease agreement with VEAP in 2013 (annual lease payments total $304,000). On Monday, January 6, 2014, the VEAP Service Center opened for clients and a few weeks later, HSPHD began providing services. This public private partnership leverages the expertise and services of both organizations and is seen as a model for nonprofit and government partnerships across the country. “I have come to think of VEAP as one of the finest social service organizations in the United States. Solving some of the transportation issues [in our community] on a cooperative basis has been really helpful and we really appreciate that effort from VEAP and its volunteer core. The new location is a tremendous investment and, I think, very necessary. I think partnering with the county was really quite an extraordinary idea because these two organizations, side by side, can really do some effective work together.” Edina Mayor James Hovland Given the success of this partnership and the positive impact on client outcomes, it is anticipated that HSPHD will renew their lease at the end of the term. Eighty-one percent of all VEAP client households have annual incomes of $19,200 or less and 57% of households include children. Each month, 9,000-10,000 individuals benefit from access to healthy foods in the VEAP food pantry. While clients come to VEAP most frequently for food support, new client assessments and emergency financial assessments administered by VEAP’s four licensed social workers uncover the underlying need, which most often goes beyond the need for food. Through these assessments, clients are connected with VEAP programs and other community resources to help them regain stability. When clients are stable, neighborhoods are stronger and the entire community benefits. Debt Restructure: In 2014, VEAP’s Board of Directors secured a mortgage note and an interest only loan ($400,000 due in 2019) to cover the outstanding renovation costs. The principal and interest payments would total $5,071,295 if carried to maturity. Please see attached payment schedule. Primary Mortgage Interest Only Loan Annual Principal Interest Principal Interest Debt Costs 2017 $92,100 $169,716 $0 $18,300 $280,116 2018 $96,391 $165,425 $0 $18,300 $280,116 2019 $100,882 $160,934 $0 $7,650 $269,466 2020 $105,135 $156,681 $400,000 $0 $661,816 2021 $110,480 $151,336 $0 $0 $261,816 2022 $3,256,846 $61,117 $0 $0 $3,317,963 Total $3,761,834 $865,211 $400,000 $44,250 $5,071,295 Building Assets and Diversified Revenue: The lease with HSPHD generates approximately $304,000 in income annually. In addition, the building at 9600 Aldrich Avenue South holds a Verizon cell tower and a billboard operated by ClearChannel Minnesota. The billboard and cell tower lease payments total $57,865 annually. The sale of these assets has been discussed as a potential way to pay down the $400,000 interest only note. If these assets were sold, it is estimated the sale would provide approximately $250,000 in a one-time cash infusion to VEAP. However, with this scenario, VEAP would lose the ongoing income streams these assets provide. What Are We Proposing? Eliminating the Mortgage Note and Interest Only Note. Eliminating the debt will provide an additional $280,116 in resources for the organization annually. If the mortgage notes were paid in full, VEAP would be able to retain the cell tower and billboard maintaining an investment that will provide a stable income stream well into the future. What eliminating the debt will mean to our clients and community: Right now, VEAP distributes 3.5 million pounds of food every year. When more adults, children and seniors have access to nutritious, healthy foods, then what? More children will arrive at school prepared to learn. More of the youngest of children will have adequate nutrition to support growing minds and bodies. More youth and teens will have proper nutrition to support healthy social, emotional and academic development. More people with chronic illness will have access to fresh and healthy foods that help improve their overall health. More adults will be properly nourished and perform better professionally. More seniors will have access to healthy foods to support their changing nutritional needs. Right now, to avoid eviction, VEAP provides emergency assistance for rent through its Social Services Program. When more families are stable in safe, affordable housing, then what? More children perform well in school because they don’t have to move. More adults are able to be better employees as their housing stress is lower. More adults know how to access resources to maintain financial and housing stability. More neighborhoods are stable and experiencing less transition. More families will have hope and will be able to plan for the future. Right now, VEAP provides transportation for income-eligible seniors to get to medical appointments. When more seniors have access to safe, dependable, no fee transportation to get them to life-supporting medical appointments, then what? More vulnerable older adults will rest easier in knowing they will have access to important medical appointments. More children of aging parents will have peace of mind knowing their mom or dad is being transported to critical medical appointments. More caretakers will find respite and support through a reliable and trustworthy transportation resource. Efficiencies--How VEAP Leverages Funding and Volunteers: VEAP’s basic needs programs are supported through charitable contributions from individuals, businesses, congregations, foundations and other groups. In 2016, charitable contributions will total approximately $2,000,000. One of VEAP’s greatest strengths is its ability to leverage every dollar it receives to the extent that every dollar donated purchases approximately $10 worth of food. VEAP also receives donated food, toys and school supplies valued at $6,699,798 in 2015. VEAP’s twenty-one member staff is supported by over 2,500 volunteers. In 2015, volunteers contributed 76,633 hours of capacity to programs for an estimated value of $1,768,000 value to the community. Why Now? In October 2015, Lisa Horn joined the organization as CEO, replacing Susan Russell Freeman who had led the organization for nearly 40 years. Under Lisa’s leadership the organization has undergone considerable progress in strengthening business processes and procedures. It has also instituted employee performance process, introduced and led an integrated department and organizational planning structure and budgeting process. In late summer 2016, VEAP launched an intense strategic planning initiative involving key stakeholders including funders, clients, community leaders and volunteers. The process consists of crafting a comprehensive strategic direction based on the balance between what doesn’t change – the timeless principles of the organization’s core ideology – and what the organization seeks to become within a longer-term plan horizon. By investing the time to identify key trends and environmental factors that impact those living in poverty – such as employment, housing and transportation – VEAP can begin to think through the implications and, where appropriate, plan a course of action. The strategic plan will be completed in early 2017. Without debt overshadowing the organization, resources for implementation of the strategic plan would be available immediately. VEAP would continue to support low-income individuals and families in the community by improving and innovating programs and begin confronting the underlying causes that perpetuate poverty in our community such as housing, employment and transportation. This is a very exciting time for VEAP. New leadership, a revitalized Board of Directors and a staff that is re-energized and forward thinking positions VEAP for success. Together with its diverse network of donors and funders, volunteers, businesses, congregations and other groups, VEAP is providing valuable programs and resources for our low-income neighbors. For more information, please contact: Lisa Horn, Chief Executive Officer VEAP (Volunteers Enlisted to Assist People) 9600 Aldrich Avenue South | Bloomington, MN | 55420 Direct: 952.955.8312 | Mobile: 952.529.0561 | Email: lisah@veap.org From:Julie Baker To:James Hovland Subject:Recent Events Date:Monday, November 07, 2016 9:10:53 AM Hi Jim: How are you? Hope all is well. It has certainly been a lovely fall! Would you have time to give me a quick phone call? I’d love to talk to you about an idea I’ve had of doing a series of community conversations on race, possibly building off smaller discussions with leadership at our local churches, the chamber of commerce, schools, the Rotaries, neighborhood groups etc. What has spurred this idea is that I am still volunteering at EHS in the Access Program so am privy to some of what has been going on there. Between that and the recent incident with the police and the man who was walking in the street, I think the time has come for us to come together as a community to try to do better. The alternative — just ducking and hoping more incidents won’t occur — is both naive and a missed opportunity in my opinion. Personally, I think Edina is a place of enormous good will. The challenge from my vantage point is to raise awareness and consciousness. I’d like to think that if we as adults set the right tone, we can help our young people navigate these waters at school. It hardly seems fair to ask them to do that if we as adults haven’t worked at it ourselves! Becky Briggs told me how impressed she was that you had offered to go speak to students at EHS. So I know this must be heavy on your heart and mind — and likely is taking up your time as well! If you have a moment to call, I’d sure appreciate it. My cell phone is 612-961-712. Alternatively, if you would want to set up a meeting with me and perhaps a few others (like Becky), that would be great as well. Just let me know. And thanks for your leadership, Jim. Best regards, Julie Baker From:Mertyce Mrvos To:Edina Mail Subject:Edina Cycling Team - State Champs! Date:Monday, November 07, 2016 8:45:17 PM Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of City Council, I wanted to be sure you knew the great news that the Edina Cycling Team earned the state championship title this year in the Minnesota High School Cycling League! In addition to the team's success, the following Edina athletes achieved individual success: Jack Ellingson - 3rd place - Varsity BoysAlec Manderscheid - 5th place - JV Boys Alex Bourgeault - 8th place - JV BoysGabi Mazion - 2nd place - JV Girls Meryl Sudeith - 2nd place - Sophomore GirlsMichael Crater - 5th place - 8th Grade Boys We hope you are still considering bringing mountain biking to Braemar! Kind Regards, Mertyce Mrvos(parent of student athlete/ECT volunteer) From:nicolle@bliiiholdings.com To:James Hovland Subject:MB Miami Beach Suncare Date:Tuesday, November 08, 2016 9:50:47 AM Attachments:image001.png Dear Mayor Hovland, It was a pleasure meeting you at the US Conference of Mayors in Indianapolis this summer. Onbehalf of all of us from Miami Beach, we hope you enjoyed your gift bag which included samples ofthe City’s official and exclusive sunscreen, Miami Beach Suncare. Last year, in partnership with Mount Sinai Medical Center, we launched the nation’s first freesunscreen dispenser program in the City of Miami Beach. As the most commonly diagnosed cancerin the United States, skin cancer impacts five million people each year and costs $8.1 billion intreatment. Most skin cancers can be prevented with appropriate sun protection that includesapplying sunscreens with broad spectrum protection (against both UVA and UVB rays), that arewater resistant and have an SPF factor of at least 30. By offering our Triple Action Sea KelpSunscreen Lotion in SPF 30, we found a unique way to offer a needed public service to all who live,work and play on our beaches, pools and parks. This award winning project has been recognized by Vice President Joe Biden as part of his CancerMoonshot Initiative. He commends the innovation of the program in finding new ways to helpprevent skin cancer in our public outdoor spaces. We would love to discuss the possibility of expanding our program in your City as a great way tobring public, private partnerships together for the betterment of our communities. Please let usknow who in your City the appropriate person to contact is. Thank you kindly for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Nicolle Nicolle Regalado Destination Brands 8600 NW 41 Street Doral, Florida 3316 Tel: 305-471-7989 From:Gubrud Robert To:James Hovland Subject:Status: Edina Community Solar Garder Date:Tuesday, November 08, 2016 7:54:31 PM Attachments:103016.png Jim, Thought you might be interested in an update on the Edina CSG. This report as of Oct. 30 indicates 87.6% subscribed. Fully subscribed capacity estimate is 63 residents which appears quite doable. The numbers for Sept 7 are being analyzed. Will forward an update as soon as available. Enjoyed the conversation Sat. night. I valued hearing your story. Bob952-956-2426 From:Mark Chamberlain To:Mark Chamberlain Subject:Fwd: Southdale Redevelopment MEETING REMINDER Date:Wednesday, November 09, 2016 1:46:51 PM I haven't heard anything lately on 7200 France, but received this email from a neighbor who has a group north of 70th that she keeps informed about the 6800 France project that weshould also be aware of as this will have impact on our neighborhood and area in general as well. Mark Chamberlain ---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Nora Davis <noradavis73@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:26 PMSubject: Southdale Redevelopment MEETING REMINDER To: Good Evening Southdale Addition neighbors: Just a reminder - tomorrow will be the Planning Commission Meeting re: the Southdale Office Redevelopment now known as "Avenue on France" DATE: Wednesday, November 9th TIME: 7:00pm LOCATION: Edina City Hall This will be a Public Hearing - so we'll be able to express our concerns. This will be ourchance to tell them we're worried about the density of the development, along with the traffic that follow. (We all know cut-through traffic will occur.) And the noise, light, and visualpollution, of course. If you're unable to attend - but still want the Planning Commission to hear your concerns - you can email them at Mail@EdinaMN.gov Make sure you put "Planning Commission" in the subject line - and your email will be printed out and given to members. Thank you! Nora Davis 6921 Southdale Road From:Marie Sullivan To:Mary Brindle Cc:James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject:Fwd: Fred Richards Date:Wednesday, November 09, 2016 3:31:24 PM Dear City Council Members,I am forwarding you the letter I sent to Ann Kattreh regarding my frustration with the city's handling of the repurposing of the Fred Richards Golf Course. I hope you will read it and actin a way respectful to my neighborhood on this continuously controversial decision. Marie Sullivan Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Marie Sullivan <mariesullivan87@gmail.com> Date: November 9, 2016 at 3:20:17 PM CSTTo: "Ann C. Kattreh" <akattreh@edinamn.gov> Subject: Fred Richards Ms. Kattreh,I recently saw a notice saying that the city of Edina "WILL BE STARTING a master planning process" to determine a re-use of the Fred Richards golf course. What do you mean "STARTING"??????? This news is extremely insulting to residents of the neighborhood who havealready invested countless hours and emotional energy participating in the FIRST process held!!! You already paid thousands of dollars to consultants and we neighbors havealready attended many meetings and conveyed our desires and concerns to the city!!! Did you even listen to us? Or was that first process all a scam to get us off yourback by pretending our voices would be heard? I cannot believe the poor quality of communication coming from the city on this subject! The Fred Richards land is most important to our neighborhood as theoutcome will greatly affect our quality of life and property values! AGAIN, the amenities our neighborhood most value in the Fred Richards Golf Course are: 1) PEACE AND QUIET! Our neighborhood suffers extreme noise levels from the flights departing MSP airport as well as continuous noise from two heavilytrafficked freeways- 494 and 100!!! The golf course provided our neighborhood a much needed QUIET buffer. We do not want sport fields or any other uses thatwill further pollute our neighborhood with additional NOISE!!! 2). NO LIGHT POLLUTION! We do NOT want lights! They would pollute our sky at night and they would encourage nighttime NOISE in our neighborhood. 3). The people who used the golf course were not only quiet, they were also politeand CLEAN!!! We do not want our cherished neighborhood green buffer zone to be used for any purpose that would generate troublesome behavior and/or litter. 4). NATURAL environment. The golf course allowed for wildlife habitation. Weprefer the land to be left natural. Perhaps with a walking path. In concise words: No NOISE, no lights, no litter, no asphalt. We want it to remain a natural area. We have been assured that under no circumstances would any of that land begiven over to developers south of the land! We expect that promise to continue!!! It is sad that those of us who live close by have been ignored, insulted, andsteamrolled. I have no reason to expect you will listen to us this time around either, but at least I can say I tried- again! Marie Sullivan Sent from my iPhone From:Stephen Michals To:James Hovland Cc:"Luigi Bernardi" Subject:Aurora on France Senior Building Tour December 1 8:30 Date:Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:01:40 AM Good morning Mr. Mayor, We would you like to have you join us for take a brief tour of the new Aurora on France Senior Building. This would be an early look at the common areas before the residents move in with Scott Neal, Luigi Bernardi and myself on December 1, 8:30 AM. Ebenezer will host a more formal open house sometime later. You can use the visitor parking at the front door on 65th and walk into the main lobby. Let me know if you would like to join us. Stephen Michals Mount Development Co. 612-250-2381 smichals@mountdev.com -----Original Message----- From: Scott H. Neal [mailto:sneal@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 7:48 AM To: Stephen Michals <smichals@mountdev.com> Subject: Re: Aurora on France Senior Building Tour confer with Mayor's office on what time works best for us. On Nov 7, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Stephen Michals <smichals@mountdev.com<mailto:smichals@mountdev.com>> wrote: Good morning, We are nearing completion of the building this week. Would you like to take a 30 minute tour with Luigi and myself before the residents start to move in December 1st? Let me know a time that meets your schedule sometime in November. Stephen Michals Mount Development Co. 612-250-2381 smichals@mountdev.com<mailto:smichals@mountdev.com> From:Kim Ross To:"Kim Ross" Subject:Southwest Rotary Clubs Veterans Day Luncheon Date:Thursday, November 10, 2016 9:19:18 AM Hello honored guests! I just wanted to let you all know that you’ll be seated at one of three head tables. They will all have reserved signs on them and place cards, so just check those tables to find your spot. Please let me know if you have any questions. We look forward to seeing you tomorrow! Thanks! Kim Kim Ross 952.975.9473 612.670.6787 - cell From:jim swindal To:James Hovland Cc:eric.nelson@threeriversparks.org Subject:Nine Mile Bike & Walking Trail Date:Thursday, November 10, 2016 3:26:59 PM Mayor Hovland, I reside at 7100 Metro Blvd, The Creekside Condominiums, I moved to Edina 2 &1/2 years ago from Burnsville. In Burnsville, I was a ardent bicyclist for many years. In Edina, I found the traffic intense and limited my bicycling to early weekend mornings. Soon after moving in, I began to hear of the Nine Mile Bike Trail that would pass right behind our building. As construction began this year on the section East and Northwest of Creekside, I was amazed at the quality of construction and the engineering that went into fitting the Trail into existing developed areas. I understand that next year the Trail will extend further and ultimately connect with other metro area trails. Today, I road the completed section East through the Fred Golf Course and Northwest to Tracy. This is an extra benefit to my moving to Edina that I did not expect. I would have paid more for my Condo if I'd know this was coming. Today, I met a Motor Cycle Policeman patrolling the Trail. He said they plan to patrol regularly. I must compliment the City of Edina and Three Rivers Park District on the vision and management of this exciting project. Jim Swindal From:peill@aol.com To:James Hovland Subject:MAC Reappointment Date:Friday, November 11, 2016 2:56:51 PM Mayor, my term on the MAC expires in January, 2017, and I have decided to apply for one more term. I know that four years ago, Edina did not support me, and I understand the reasons why that was the case. I am hoping that enough has changed during the ensuing years so that you could consider supporting my reappointment, and that is the purpose of this email. I believe that the City's relationship with the MAC and with me as improved dramatically since the RNAV issue first came up in 2012. I will follow up with a phone call, but would be honored and grateful for your support. Thank you for considering this request. Lisa Peilen 952.920.9441 From:Robert Ellis To:James Hovland Subject:FW: Town Center Station - Regional Solicitation - Transit Expansion Date:Tuesday, November 15, 2016 10:27:39 AM Mayor Hovland, I’m sure you are aware Eden Prairie has a Regional Solicitation application in for the Town Center Station. I also know you are intimately aware of this project, so the purpose of my e-mail is to share what I have been passing along to other TAB and TAC members…………. The station was always planned to be part of the Green Line Extension project scope. Late in the design process, when overall project costs started exceeding previous estimates, Eden Prairie offered to defer the station. This was done as part of a cost cutting measure to keep CTIB and Hennepin County as a committed funding partner for LRT. This and other cuts/donations went a long ways towards getting project costs closer to approved funding limits and kept the project moving forward However, this is still an important station to the Green Line Extension, and Eden Prairie has found itself in the unique position of helping to build out the Metro Transit LRT system that was always planned. We are now at a critical juncture because without immediate funding this station cannot be built ahead of Green Line Extension opening day. The next round of solicitations will be too late, and even if that were an option it would cause a major disruption to LRT service while the station is being constructed. This is something we are all hoping to avoid (riders, city and Metro Transit). At any rate, I have listed some information about the Town Center station application below that may be useful in your funding option decision making. 1. We are poised to be the fifth highest scoring project out of ten in the Transit Expansion category with a total project score of 501 (after appealing a score of 492). 2. If there is a desire to draw the line between which projects get funding and which ones don’t where there is a large separation in scores, then including the TCS is prudent. In our case there should be a large separation between our project (501 points) and the next highest project (438 points). Also, our project (501 points) is very close to the fourth highest scoring project (513 points). 3. The Transit Expansion and Transit Modernization categories are dominated by Metro Transit applications, so they will surely see a large portion of the funding. Eden Prairie and Apple Valley are the only two cities vying for funds and both projects scored well so awarding them would help provide a level of equity. Also, if the TCS project gets selected then the Southwest Transit project that scored slightly higher could also be awarded, further sharing funds. 4. In the Transit Expansion category the TCS application scored the highest in the Cost Effectiveness and Multimodal criteria (see page 7 on the first link below). This results in the TCS scoring the highest in two of the seven criteria. 5. If the top five applications from Transit Expansion (this includes TCS and Southwest Transit), the top five from Transit Modernization (this includes Apple Valley), and all projects in TDM were chosen, the total would award would equal $57.6M. This is slightly less than the maximum funding available for these categories which is $58M. https://metrocouncil.org/Council-Meetings/Committees/Transportation-Advisory-Board-TAB/TAB- Technical-Advisory-Committee/TAC-Funding-and-Programming-Committee/2016/TAC-Funding- Programming-Committee-10-20-16/7_InfoScores.aspx Like I mentioned above, I know you are familiar with the project details. I think we make a good argument for funding, and am hopeful this will be awarded in January. Best regards, Robert Ellis Public Works Director • City of Eden Prairie • (952) 949-8310 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie • MN • 55344 Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Kelly Dumais, City Management Fellow Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission September 27th, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description HRRC September Meeting Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ' Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights and Relations Commission Edina City Hall, Community Room September 27, 2016 7:00pm I. Call To Order Chair Arseneault called the September 27, 2016 Human Rights and Relations Commission meeting to order at 7:02 PM. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Arseneault, Commissioners Beringer, Edelson, Edwards, Kennedy, Martin and Nelson. Student Commissioners Chao and Sinha. Staff present: HRRC Staff Liaison MJ Lamon. Late Arrival: Meek Absent Members: Commissioner Vecchio-Smith. Left Early: Commissioner Beringer III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Kennedy to approve the Human Rights and Relations September 27, 2016 meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Martin. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Edelson to approve the August 22, 2016 meeting minutes amending the Commissioner Comments to remove Edwards comment. Motion seconded by Kennedy. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations The HRRC welcomed new student commissioners Prasoon Sinha and Connie Chao. VI. Community Comment Colleen Feige, Former member of the HRRC and Edina resident came to thank the commission on achieving the Human Rights City Designation and hopes there is interest in continuing the efforts of Human Rights in the City. Colleen shared a letter received from Pittsburgh congratulating the team on the designation. Arnie Bigbee, Former member of the HRRC and Edina resident. Arnie brought the following topics to the attention of the commission. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: • Report on community conversations • City of Minneapolis recording demographics on traffic stops • School district boundaries for Edina residents in Hopkins school district • Affordable Housing Commissioner Meek arrived at 7:14pm. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2016 Work Plan Updates • Sharing Values, Sharing Community • Committee presented marketing materials for the event and secured commission members’ assistance with poster distribution. • Committee shared plan for the flow of the event. • Committee requested and received volunteers (Martin, Nelson, Edwards, Chao, Sinha, Arseneault) to assist at the event. • Community Council Meeting Update • Commissioner Kennedy recently attended the Community Council Meeting. • Highlighted topics included: Edina Resource Center new website design that is more user friendly and provides a list of all community-based resources; survey and other data from the Edina school district; and the community resource center’s focus on mental health. Commissioner Beringer left at 7:47pm. • CEDAW Update • There will be a virtual planning committee established to create a virtual conference on December 9. • The Cities of Red Wing and Falcon Heights are considering resolutions in support of CEDAW. B. Indigenous Peoples Day Designation • A draft resolution was presented to the HRRC for consideration. Motion by Kennedy to approve the draft resolution to be sent to Council for consideration with the amendment to paragraph 6 to add “including the Minnesota cities of St. Paul, Minneapolis, Red Wing, and Grand Rapids” after the phrase, “Several States, many cities through the nation.” Motion seconded by Edelson. Motion carried. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: C. 2017 Proposed Work Plan Motion made by Nelson to approve 2017 proposed work plan for Council consideration. Motion seconded by Martin. Motion carried. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions Correspondence was received but not discussed. IX. Chair And Member Comments Chair Arseneault reported she connected with a resident who asked if the HRRC has discussed the yard signs in support of the Edina Police Department. Commissioner Kennedy described an October 10 speaking event at William Mitchell Law School to commemorate Indigenous Peoples Day and reported on MN Department of Human Rights Commissioner Kevin Lindsey’s plan for more outreach with Human Rights Commissions. X. Staff Comments None. XI. Adjournment Motion by Kennedy to adjourn the September 27, 2016 HRRC meeting at 9:14 PM. Motion seconded by Edelson. Motion carried. Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Sharon Allison, Engineering Specialist Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission, September 15, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive the approved minutes of the Edina Transportation Commission for Sept. 15, 2016. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes, ETC, Sept. 15, 2016 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/27/2016 1 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Room September 15, 6:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair LaForce called the meeting to order. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Brown, Iyer, Janovy, Koester, LaForce, Loeffelholz, Miranda and Olk. Absent at roll call was member Olson. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by member Bass and seconded by member Iyer approving the edited Aug. 18, 2016, minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Community Comments None. New student members David Koester and Megan Olk were welcomed and introduced. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Stop Sign Reflective Strip Study Engineering Department intern, Sean Hayford Oleary presented the study. Mr. Hayford Oleary explained that the study was done to determine the effects of vertical reflective strips on stop sign compliance because stop sign complaints. He said for three days, they collected video data at W. 42nd Street and Alden Avenue – this intersection has a 3-way stop sign and is near a school. They measured wheel stoppage and speed within a certain distance of the stop sign and the conclusion is to not recommend installation because “the reflective strips do not show a meaningful improvement in driver behavior.” Discussion • What else can be done? Planner Nolan said enforcement. • It may be that the crosswalk in the area draw drivers’ attention more than the stop signs; the stop signs are probably not warranted. • Have studies been done to see if drivers come to a complete stop at stop signs? Planner Nolan said not specifically but it is noted when observed in other studies. • Is the traffic cut thru or local? The presumption is it is local traffic. B. Passenger Rail Service in Edina: SWOT Analysis Opportunities • Add: Peer review literature that supports access to transportation and economic benefits. Weakness • Revise #1: Construction of stations will be more expensive. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/27/2016 2 • They discussed the purpose of the SWOT Analysis, how to respond the three questions asked by city council, public engagement, and hiring a consultant C. 2017 Neighborhood and MSA Street Reconstruction Draft Engineering Studies Planner Nolan said streets would be narrowed per their practice for streets with or without sidewalk. • Parklawn Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Mr. Toby Muse, project manager, with Short Elliott Hendrickson, presented the study. Mr. Muse said the project area is from W. 76th Street to France Avenue. The project will include almost all entirely new curb and gutter, the two curves will be redesigned but will not meet MSA standards (a variance has already been granted), construction of a 10 ft. Nine Mile Creek trail, consolidation of Metro Transit bus stops, new crosswalks, etc. Discussion • Suggestion to install a covered bus shelter; it was noted that this would be a City expense if not warranted by Metro Transit. • Would the intersection at Parklawn Avenue and Gallagher Drive be a good fit for a roundabout? Gallagher Drive was narrowed when it was reconstructed several years ago and the right-of-way is limited. • Who is responsible for snow plowing the trail? Public Works if they are currently plowing the existing sidewalk. • Concerned with low survey participation; suggestion to remove reference to the survey percentage because it gives a distorted view of participation; another suggestion was to use a different method to get input when reconstructing streets with apartment buildings in order to get feedback from the residents; serving food at meetings was also suggested. Mr. Andrew Scipioni, engineering technician with the engineering department, asked for feedback on the following studies. • Birchcrest A/Countryside B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Discussion • Staff explained that they are not recommending the sidewalk east on Valley View Road with the project because residents were told it would be several years before it would be reconsidered. Staff was asked if it would be more cost effective to do this sidewalk now and they said generally, yes. Chair Laforce would like it presented to Council on a map with a “big hole” to show the gap. Staff also explained that they are not recommending the sidewalk on W. 60th St due to low vehicle counts. Suggestion was made to remove it from the Comprehensive Plan and to include an explanation for the removal. Another suggestion was to present the City Council with a sidewalk map showing the gap that will continue to exist because they did not approve the sidewalk on Valley View Road east of the project area when they had an opportunity. • Would like to see how the bump-outs function in the Morningside Neighborhood before adding more. Planner Nolan said they will still recommend them but they can be pulled if necessary. • How many trees will be impacted for adding sidewalks? Engineering technician Scipioni said maybe two will be removed on Hansen Road, and only tree trimming on Valley View Road. He could not recall any being impacted on Maddox Avenue, and on Mildred Avenue there are 12 arborvitaes within the right-of- way. Motion made by member Janovy and seconded by member Boettge to write an advisory communication to the City Council about the missing segment of Valley View Road sidewalk. Member Iyer will write the advisory communication, and members Bass and Loeffelholz will review. All voted aye. Motion passed. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/27/2016 3 • Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction No comment. • Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Discussion • Engineering technician Scipioni explained that a multimodal survey was not done because of the smaller size of the project; a workshop was done instead. • Engineering technician Scipioni explained that the York/Zenith Avenue alley is too narrow for the City to maintain it (they would encroach on private property). D. 2017 Transportation Commission Work Plan Discussion about work plan items • The Comp Plan next update is next year and this will be big. • So many developments that they’re not spending any time on; should spend most of their time on developments as it relates to transportation. • Eliminating walking map – member Boettge said she is willing to do this. • The Work Plan is to be submitted to City Council by the end of September. • Are they setting themselves up for success with the Work Plan? • Human Rights host meetings and speakers. Each commission is different. • Living Streets Implementation (fold into new developments that Planning Commission handles). • Passenger Rail – support/guide study. • Southdale redevelopment – what is their role? o The transportation study was presented to them. o There is a lag between the development community and transportation engineer. o They’ve talked about forming a joint group with the Planning Commission (PC). Set up like a bill where the review process disseminates to different bodies. o The ETC could be sole arbiter of Living Streets or they can set it up so everyone feels ownership because it is not only transportation related. o How do they include Living Streets with PC’s work? Transportation Impact Analysis process hasn’t been updated; develop guidance for it and align traffic studies with Living Streets. • Eliminate circulator – it is hard to identify demand for this service. They could look at revising current bus routes and there are self-driving vehicles being tested. E. Additional Updates on 2016 Work Plan Initiatives No updates. F. Traffic Safety Report of Aug. 3, 2016 A.1. Make the signs aesthetically pleasing. B.2. A roundabout was suggested. Planner Nolan said one was in the CIP but it was not funded. He was asked if they could get it approved for 2017 and he said he would try. He was asked if PACS could fund the roundabout and he said it would significantly impact one or two years of PACS’ budget. B.3. With Hwy. 169 closing, how would this affect residents? Planner Nolan said after discussion with the requestor, they found the issue was sightline related. Regarding TH-169 closure, planner Nolan said they will have to wait and to see what happens with traffic and MnDOT will make adjustments accordingly. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/27/2016 4 B.6. Move to C for further study because people are feeling uncomfortable. Planner Nolan said attempts are being made to address issue and if moved to C, the TSC won’t know what to do besides what is already being done, e.g. PCA, police enforcement, etc. He asked for suggestions and doing targeted enforcement two times annually to educate the community was suggested. Planner Nolan will revise the item and discuss with the police department. Motion made by member Bass and seconded by member Iyer to forward the Aug. 3, 2016, TSC report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion passed. • Traffic Safety Report of Sept. 7, 2016 A.1. On-street parking policy still does not permit handicap parking? Yes, and staff is reviewing this. B.1. Seem like a partial approval. D.8. Should be in B because it is a denial. Planner Nolan will look at this. D.3. Should have come thru as item A or B. Planner Nolan said it was easy to resolve. Motion made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass to forward the Sept. 7, 2016, TSC report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion passed. VII. Correspondence And Petitions None. VIII. Chair and Member Comments A. Participation in 2016 Open Streets on 50th Event Chair LaForce said Open Streets is scheduled for Sept. 25 and the plan is to set up a table, have transportation related maps and comment boxes for residents to provide feedback. Majority of the commissioners volunteered to work shifts at the event. Member Iyer noted again the condition of an area on York Avenue that CenterPoint restored that is in bad shape. Planner Nolan will reach out to CenterPoint. Member Iyer suggested a roundabout at W. 66th Street and Valley View Road, hopefully paid for by developers. Member Bass said she attended a planning meeting with City staff regarding an urban design symposium with speakers and she recommended the City consider strategic communication and have the ETC and/or PC write an opinion letter to the editor and also ask speakers to address specific issues that comes up in the City. Member Brown noted how difficult it was to travel on France Avenue between TH-62 and W. 50th Street because of increased traffic. He said it is becoming unlivable. Member Boettge said mayor Hovland had suggested a crosswalk at Dunberry with the Cornelia Sidewalk and asked planner Nolan if this was still planned. Planner Nolan said staff is planning on conducting a pedestrian count at this location to determine need. Student member Koester said it is impossible to cross the intersections of Antrim Road/Valley View Road/Tracy Avenue at the high school, even with a crossing guard. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 10/27/2016 5 Chair LaForce said he attended a visioning session. Chair LaForce said he spoke with his neighbor about Benton Avenue and TH-100 who still feels the area is dangerous but it seems to be a sightline issue. The stop sign needs to be pulled back because of its current location to the crosswalk. IX. Staff Comments for September 2016 • The 2016 projects are wrapping up. • 2016 sidewalk projects are progressing; Xerxes Avenue will begin next week. • Arden Park D ‘no parking’ sign study: director Millner will update the City Council next week on the no parking study and survey of residents that was done. Results of the survey showed that residents favor one-sided parking, except for Bruce Avenue and Bruce Place (removing these signs), and they favor the 12x12 size signs. • TH-169 construction schedule was revised to closing from January to September; MnDOT is holding outreach meetings and the first one is scheduled for 9/21 in St. Louis Park. • Chuck Marohn with StrongTowns.org, will be doing an all-day event in Edina on Sept. 30, including a luncheon with the ETC and PC and a driving tour of several locations. • Reminder that the ETC’s October meeting will be the 4th Thursday, instead of the regular 3rd week schedule. X. Calendar of Events A. Schedule of Meeting and Events as of September 15, 2016 XI. Adjournment at 9:40 p.m. J F M A M J J A S O N D SM WS # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME TERM (Date) 6/21 Bass, Katherine 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Boettge, Emily 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Brown, Andy 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 90% Iyer, Surya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Loeffelholz, Ralf 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Janovy, Jennifer 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Miranda, Lou 3/1/2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Olson, Larry 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Koester, David (student) 9/1/2017 1 1 100% Olk, Megan (student) 9/1/2017 1 1 100% Ding, Emily (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 2 20% Ruehl, Lindsey (student) 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 40% TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.3. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Park Board Meeting, October 10, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Park Board, Oct. 10, 2016 Minutes Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/7/2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Park Board Edina Senior Center October 10, 2016 I. Call To Order Chair McCormick called the meeting to order at 7:01p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair McCormick, Members Strother, Nelson, Miller, Good, Mohs, Dahlien, Gieseke and Student Members Hulbert and Gustafson. Absent was Member Meyer. Late arrival was Member McAwley. Staff present: Park Board Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Support Specialist Janet Canton and Braemar Arena & Field General Manager Chad Eischens, III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Nelson to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Strother. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Miller to approve the Sept. 13, 2016 minutes. Motion seconded by Dahlien. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Chad Eischens Introduction Chad Eischens, Braemar Arena & Field General Manager, gave a personal introduction of himself to the Park Board. B. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Progress Update Eric Nelson from Three Rivers Park District gave an update and the progress they are making on the construction of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail as well as what is left to do in the next 18 months. Park Board members asked questions. Liaison Kattreh thanked Three Rivers Park for the great job they are doing and for being so easy to work with. VI. Community Comment Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/7/2016 None VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Fred Richards Park Master Plan Consultant Recommendation Liaison Kattreh gave a brief history on how they got to this point to make a recommendation on the Master Plan consultant for Fred Richards. Terry Minarik from Confluence, Inc., went through their six phase planning process and gave a history of what Confluence has done in other areas and what their ideas are going forward. Member McAwley arrived at 7:37 p.m. Park Board members asked questions regarding the process as well as what will be the Park Board’s part in the process. Liaison Kattreh went through the next steps of the process. B. Multi-Year Playground Priority Plan Parks & Recreation Assistant Director Faus went through the multi-year playground replacement priority plan. She explained how they use three criteria, ranking system and CIP. None of the playgrounds recommended were funded in the 2017-2021 CIP. Park Board members asked questions and had discussions. C. 2016 Recap Chair McCormick split the Park Board members into two groups for 15 minutes to review the past year work plans and come up with a list of what they would like to keep doing, start doing and stop doing. After the 15 minutes the Park Board members came together as a group and discussed what it is the Park Board would like to keep doing, start doing and stop doing. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions Chair McCormick acknowledged the Park Board’s receipt of various correspondences. IX. Chair and Member Comments Chair McCormick informed the Park Board she recently met with other board and commission chairs to share their work plans. It was decided everyone wants to work closer together; especially if things overlap so they are not so siloed. In addition, City Manager Neal Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/7/2016 explained a new “Council Charge” ranking they will be using with the Work Plans and will explain how the new rankings work once the work plans have been approved. Chair McCormick informed the Park Board the City Council made some good comments regarding the Park Board Work Plan. Also there was acknowledgement that we need to get the website fixed so that there will be no issues with registration. Chair McCormick informed the Park Board that all of the other boards and commissions had a large work item for updating the Comprehensive Plan; fortunately, the Park Board finished their Strategic Plan so a lot of that will fit into the Comprehensive Plan. X. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh gave the following updates: • The dome installation will take place on Oct. 21 and 22 • Ground breaking for the regulation course construction started last Tuesday; the Academy Nine and Driving Range are still open • Two events are being held at Braemar Golf Course; Oct. 21 is the Daddy-Daughter Princess Ball and Oct. 22 is Mommy-Son Superhero • Oct. 28 is the No So Scary Halloween Party at Edinborough Park • Centennial Lakes putting course, paddle boats and lawn games are is now closed for the season • The Edina Art Center will have Minnesota potter Jeff Ostrich lead a workshop and group exhibition Oct. 28 through the 30 • Recreation Supervisor Donna Tilsner will be retiring after 17 years with the City of Edina and 41 years in Parks & Recreation; her last day is Nov. 30 XI. Adjournment Motion made by Gieseke to adjourn the Oct. 10, 2016 meeting at 9:20 p.m. Motion seconded by McAwley. Motion carried. Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: C.4. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Heritage Preservation Board, October 10, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: Attached are the minutes from the October 10, 2016 Heritage Preservation Board meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Heritage Preservation Board Minutes, October 10, 2016 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall Council Chambers Monday, October 10, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. I. To Order Chair Birdman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Birdman and Members Moore, Sussman, Christiaansen, McLellan, Kelly, Nymo, Loving, and Student Members Puerzer and Nemerov. Absent was Member Pearson. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Moore and seconded by Kelly to approve the Agenda. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Kelly and seconded by McLellan to approve the minutes from the September 13, 2016 HPB meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment - None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Certificate of Appropriateness: 4608 Casco Avenue - A New Home Planner Repya explained that the existing home, a Contemporary style constructed in 1977 is not considered an historic resource because it was not built during the Country Club District’s period of significance (1924-1944). Non-historic resources may be torn down; however a replacement home must receive a Certificate of Appropriateness confirming that the design meets the criteria of the Country Club District’s plan of treatment. The proposed home underwent an initial review at the September 13, 2016 HPB meeting when the board provided input, but took no action. The final plans currently under consideration have undergone revisions to address the HPB’s comments. Staff now finds that the proposed home complies with the criteria set out in the plan of treatment, is compatible with the historic character of the district, and will cause no harm to adjacent historic homes, as required by the Country Club District’s plan of treatment Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/7/2016 Heritage Preservation Board October 10, 2016 2 Ms. Repya concluded that staff recommends approval of the subject request for a replacement home subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans dated September 21, 2016, with the front balcony corrected to extend no further than 3 feet into the front setback. 2. A sign (not to exceed 6 sq. ft.) with a rendering of the approved home displayed on the property. 3. A year built plaque is displayed on the home. 4. The HPB’s staff liaison is provided a final inspection of the home prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Photographs of all elevations of the new construction shall be provided once the house is completed. The following neighbors spoke relative to the proposal for the new home: • Stuart Adler, 4610 Casco Avenue • Lois Peterson, 4604 Casco Avenue • An email was also received from the northerly neighbor, Lisa Korslund 4606 Casco Avenue who had reviewed the plans, but was unable to attend the meeting: The comments provided included: • Appreciation for the changes provided in the proposed plan. • Questioning the drainage - particularly whether the home would have gutters. • Questioning the lack of architectural detailing on the north elevation of the garage wall; the previous plan included windows to break up the long blank wall - now the windows have been deleted. Heritage Preservation Board members thanked the applicant and architect for their responsiveness in addressing the suggestions for changes to the plans provided at the September meeting. Questions were raised relative to the following: • Wondering if the material proposed for the exterior would be real stucco or stucco panels. • Expressing concern regarding the blank wall on the west end of the north elevation of the garage - suggesting that either windows or some other type of articulation be provided on that expanse of wall. Applicant Dan Schaefer owner of Landmark Construction LLC; and architect Andrea Swan were present and provided the following responses to the questions from the neighbors and HPB: • The rain chains shown on the front elevation will be decorative. Gutters/downspouts are proposed, however the exact location has not yet been determined. • The stucco proposed on the exterior will be real - not stucco panels. • The windows on the north elevation of the garage were removed from the final plan to provide more storage and privacy in the garage; considering that garage windows are Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/7/2016 Heritage Preservation Board October 10, 2016 3 provided on the south elevation. Motion was made by Kelly and seconded by Moore to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for a new home at 4608 Casco Avenue subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans dated September 21, 2016; with the following changes: a. The Juliet balcony on the east (front) elevation may project not more than 3 feet into the front setback; and b. A window or some type of articulation acceptable to staff should be added to the west end of the garage wall (1st floor) on the north elevation. 2. A sign (not to exceed 6 sq. ft.) with a rendering of the approved home displayed on the property. 3. A year built plaque is displayed on the home. 4. The HPB’s staff liaison is provided a final inspection of the home prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 5. Photographs of all elevations of the new construction shall be provided once the House is completed. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. 2016 Certified Local Government (CLG) Annual Report Because this meeting was the only televised meeting of the year, Planner Repya provided a PowerPoint presentation that outlined the mission, goals and responsibilities of the Heritage Preservation Board; as well as the details of the board’s activities during fiscal year 2016 (October 1, 2016 - September 30, 2016). C. Election of a New Vice Chair Chair Birdman announced that the departure of former HPB member Ryan Weber who was the Vice Chair created the need to vote on his replacement to fill the office for the remainder of the 2016 year (until elections in February 2017). The nomination of Member Moore for the office of Vice Chair was offered by Sussman and seconded by Kelly. Moore accepted the nomination. All voted aye. Member Moore is now the Vice Chair of the HPB. VII. Correspondence And Petitions - None VIII. Chair And Member Comments • Member Moore - The Southdale exhibit opened at the Edina Historical Society last weekend with great attendance (about 150 people). Moore invited the HPB to hold the Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/7/2016 Heritage Preservation Board October 10, 2016 4 regular November or December meeting at the Edina Historical Society to enable the board to have a private showing of the exhibit. • Member Christiaansen - Attended a Vision Edina meeting last Friday put on by Planners and Engineers that focused on transportation and the roadway systems which she found fascinating. As a result of that visioning session, she has contacted Council Member Mary Brindle about organizing some “Jane Jacobs” walks in the community. Jane Jacobs was a renowned planner who crafted a program for community members to design walks that help community members discover and share nuances of their area; highlighting such things as details of infrastructure, design and stories of how the community grew. • Member Birdman - - Announced that he attended the Adath Yeshurun Cemetery tour led by HPB member Peter Sussman on Sunday, Oct. 9th and found it to be fascinating. The cemetery is well designed and maintained, and is an asset to the community. He particularly liked learning more about the Jewish culture and practices. He concluded by thanking Sussman and Adath Yeshurun’s manager, Dan Kantar for providing the tour opportunity. - As Chair of the HPB, Birdman had recently attended several work sessions focusing on the HPB’s upcoming 2017 Work Plan. The Chairs of the City’s advisory boards shared information on their activities and expressed a desire for more collaboration among the City’s boards. - The upcoming work on the Comprehensive Plan is a common theme for all boards and commissions. As mentioned previously, there will be more collaboration with members of the Planning Commission being assigned to one of the City’s boards or commissions to guide them through the process; which will ensure that there is continuity for the final product. IX. Staff Comments • The regular November meeting has been moved to Monday, November 7th because Tuesday, November 8th is Election Day. X. Adjournment Motion was made by Moore and seconded by Kelly to adjourn the meeting at 7:50 p.m. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce Repya Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/7/2016 Heritage Preservation Board October 10, 2016 5 Date: November 15, 2016 Agenda Item #: XIII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Meetings and Events as of November 15, 2016 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The schedule is provided for information only. ATTACHMENTS: Description November 15, 2016 Schedule of Events CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Mon Nov 14 Special Closed HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Nov 15 Canvass of General Election 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Finalize Boards & Commissions 2017 Work Plans 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM HRA Work Session 6:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thu Nov 24 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Fri Nov 25 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues Dec 6 Work Session – Liquor Operations 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting With Arts & Culture Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 20 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session – TBD 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Dec 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Dec 26 CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Mon Jan 2 NEW YEAR’S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed Jan 4 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jan 16 REVEREND DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed Jan 18 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session – TBD 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Feb 7 Work Session – TBD 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Feb 20 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed Feb 22 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session – TBD 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS