Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-02-22 HRA Regular Meeting PacketAgenda Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Council Chambers Immediately Following The Regular City Council Meeting Wednesday, February 22, 2017 7:00 PM I.Call to Order II.Roll Call III.Approval of Meeting Agenda IV.Adoption of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Commissioner of the HRA. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of HRA Commissioners present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes of February 7, 2017 Regular HRA Meeting B.Adopt Purchasing Policy V.4416 Valley View Road - Status Update VI.Redevelopment of Southdale Library Site - Project Update VII.Adjournment The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority wants all participants to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli4cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: February 22, 2017 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Chair & Commissioners of the Edina HRA Item Type: Minutes From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes of February 7, 2017 Regular HRA Meeting Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 CITY OF EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Minutes February 7, 2017 HRA Meeting Page 1 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 7, 2017 9:40 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 9:40 P.M. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Chair Hovland. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Brindle, seconded by Commissioner Staunton approving the Meeting Agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Motion made by Commissioner Staunton, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the consent agenda as follows: IV. A. Approve minutes of January 4, 2017 Regular HRA Meeting IV. B Affirm 2017 Meeting Dates IV.C Adopt Resolution No. 2017-01: Designating the Edina Sun Current Official Newspaper for 2017 IV.D Adopt Resolution No. 2017-02: Designating Official Depositories - Bremer Bank, Crown Bank, Eagle Crest Capital Bank, Fidelity Bank, Fifth Third Bank, First Minnesota Bank, BMO Harris Bank N.A., Merrick Bank North American Banking Company, TCF National Bank, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo Bank and Western Bank designated IV.E Approve Request for Purchase – Contract for Environmental Services, 3944 West 49 1/2 Street to Barr Engineering Co., in the amount of $64,450.00. IV.F. Appoint Douglas Hall and Mary Kay McNee to the Edina Housing Foundation with terms expiring 3/1/2020. V. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:44 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director Date: February 22, 2017 Agenda Item #: IV.B. To:Chair & Commissioners of the Edina HRA Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager and Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Adopt Purchasing Policy Action Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 CITY OF EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the revised Purchasing Policy dated January 4, 2017. INTRODUCTION: Historically, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has followed the same purchasing policy used by the City of Edina. This item proposes to continue that practice. It is recommended that the updated purchasing policy adopted by the City Council in January 2017 also be used by the Edina HRA. ATTACHMENTS: Description Purchasing Policy - January 2017 ☐C ☒C ☐D Ci E City Council City-Wide Department ity of E EDINA P I. The Edin and susta purchase purpose develop d resource that impa be handle I. The City responsib purchasin Council a the City. projects approved budget, b II. The purc and paym legal com resource Identificat Once pu what typ required Identifi Edina P PURCH Purpose na Purchasing ainable purch es made by t per the Edin data regardi es and promo air the City’s ed as approp Backgro y of Edina ha ble for maki ng and proje approves a b The City M and operatio d by the Dep by the City M Process chasing proc ment. Purch mpliance and es are being tion Phase rchasers ide e of process for a purch ication App Rev Policy HASING e: g Policy aims hasing in Cit he City of E na Public Pur ng the use o ote transpar s ability to d priate in the ound s a decentra ng their own ect managem biennial budg Manager and ons remain w partment Di Manager ess is compr asing should promote tr used respon entify what k s is required ase is critica Evalu proved: 1/4/2016 vised: Click here POLICY s to better g ty operation Edina. All exp rpose Expen of City funds rency in our deliver servic circumstanc alized purcha n purchases ment with the get that alloc Department within the B rector or in rised of four d flow throug ransparency nsibly. kind of purch d for that pur al to ensuring uation 6 to enter a date Y guide service s. This Purc penditures b nditure Polic s which can b operations. ces are outsi ces. asing proces in order to e aid of expe cates funds f t Directors a Budget. Purch n the case of r phases: ide gh these pha in our proce hase they wo rchase. Corr g that the ap Autho e. e to Edina re hasing Policy by the City o cy. The Purc be used to b . Purchases r ide the scop ss. Individual support flex ertise at the for projects are respons hases not w f a purchase entification, e ases chrono ess as well a ould like to rectly identi ppropriate le rization esidents thro y will be use of Edina mus hasing Policy better manag required by pe of this po department xibility and d e departmen and operati ible for ensu within budget exceeding a evaluation, a logically so a as to ensure make, they m ifying the typ egal requirem Pay ough consist ed for all st serve a pu y also serves ge public emergencie licy and sho ts are gener discretion of t level. The ions through uring that t should be a departmen authorization as to mainta that City must identify pe of proces ments are m yment tent ublic s to s uld rally f City hout t n, ain y ss met. Page | 2 There are multiple spending thresholds that trigger both statutory and policy requirements. These are referred to as Purchase Levels. Table 1 below outlines the necessary process and documentation for the different Purchase Levels, including what purchasers should do if a purchase uses federal dollars. Purchasers should acquire all of the documentation and authorization indicated for the applicable Purchase Level. The majority of purchases made by the City will be a Purchase Level 1-4. However, if federal dollars are used for a purchase, Purchase Level 5, the federal regulations preempt city policy and purchasers should refer to the federal regulations for direction in the use of those funds. These funds may become available through different mechanisms, such as Community Development Block Grants. Purchasers must be confident in their funding source to ensure that they are following the correct purchasing procedure. The Finance Department is available as a resource to help identify what federal regulations apply to a purchase. Table 1: Purchase Level Value of Purchase Quotations Needed Required Internal Documents Authorization Workflow PL-1 Less than $10,000 Departmental Discretion *Purchase Evaluation recommended, but not required Authorized Purchaser PL-2 $10,000 - $19,999 Two Written Quotes Purchase Evaluation Purchase Authorization Authorized Purchaser Department Director PL-3 $20,000 - $99,999 Two Written Quotes, Bids or RFPs Purchase Authorization Purchase Evaluation Request for Purchase/ Change Order Authorized Purchaser Department Director City Manager City Council PL-4 Greater than $100,000 Sealed Bids Purchase Authorization Purchase Evaluation Request for Purchase/ Change Order Authorized Purchaser Department Director City Manager City Council PL-5 Any Federal Dollars Purchaser must consult federal regulations for purchasing procedure Departments are responsible for retaining a record of their quotations, bids and RFPs according to the City’s retention schedule. Service Contracts that exceed $20,000 in costs are subject to the requirements for Purchase Level-3.Whenever possible, purchasers should explore purchasing through a national association purchasing alliance or a state, county or other cooperative created by a joint powers agreement that the City of Edina is a part of. The City may contract for the purchase of supplies, materials or equipment through one of these mechanisms without regard to the competit purchasin Minnesot If the Cit orders th may appr However contract, Evaluatio The Evalu This mea impact o general. T Evaluatio framewo compone budget im and com The City Evaluatio resource form rec about pu $10,000, considera purchasin purchase a. B S ex C in C o to in P tive bidding r ng process. T ta Statutes 4 ty Council ap hat may beco rove change r, if the chan , then the pu on Phase uation Phase ans consider n the Edina The Edina Pu on echoes a t ork to reflect ents of susta mpact, enviro munity impa y will use the on to better es. The Purch ords staff co rchasing dec however th ations shoul ng decisions e. Budget Impac ustainable pu xpenditures City resource ndicate the in City Budget, f a purchase o a budgetar nsufficient fu urchase Eva requirement The coopera 412.311 and pproves a pr ome necessa order in ex nge order m urchase shou e is grounde ring the holis community urchase triple bottom t the three ainable purch onmental im act. e Purchase manage pub hase Evaluat onsideration cisions over hese d be a part o regardless o ct urchasing m . Planning fo es beyond o ntended fun it could be a e, the purcha ry line item. nds, the alte luation form ts. However ative purcha 471.545. roject contr ary through xcess of $20, aterially cha uld be prese d in the nee stic impact o in m line hasing: mpact blic tion s of all of cost even eans that th or payment p ur budgeted ding source a grant, it co aser will assi If the line ite ernative fund m. r, these purc asing guidelin act that pro the course ,000 without anges the ter ented to City ed to make p of a purchase when the fo e City must prior to purc d capacity. Bu for a purcha ould be a don gn a paymen em that the ding source s chases shoul nes are outli ovides for fle of the proje t requiring a rms of a con y Council fo purchasing d e on City op orm itself is be able to s chase ensure udget impac ase. The fun nation, or so nt code for t purchase w should also d still follow ned in more xibility to ad ect, then the additional co ntract so as t or approval. ecisions that perations as not require sufficiently fu es that we d ct considerat nding source omething els the purchase will be attribu be recorded Pa w the rest of e detail in ddress chang project man ouncil approv to create a n t are sustain well as the ed for the und all do not deple tions should could be th se. Upon rec e that corre uted to has d on the age | 3 f the ge nager val. new nable. ete he ceipt lates Page | 4 Purchases not within budget should be coded accurately within a department’s budget, but the adjustments necessary to absorb that cost should also be described under Budget Impact in the Purchase Evaluation. Recording the Budget Impact on the purchase evaluation helps to document these instances as well as facilitate better budget management throughout the City. Possible Considerations for the Budget Impact of a purchase are:  What is the funding source for this purchase? b. Environmental Impact Consideration for the environmental impact of City purchases translates to a safer, more sustainable, and healthier environment for Edina residents as well as for people and animals in our larger community, region, and world. All purchases have an impact on the environment; our goal is to manage that impact by mitigating negative impacts and creating positive ones. Staff should consider the lifecycle impact for their purchases. Life cycle impacts include the sourcing, manufacturing, distribution, use and disposal of a product and represent the environmental resources consumed, emitted, or impacted by a product. In addition, the Environmental Impact of a purchase could identify how a purchase affects the City’s use of resources such as carbon, energy, water and waste. Product life-cycle: Environmental considerations can vary based on the type of purchase being considered. Staff are encouraged to partner with the Edina Sustainability Coordinator in the Administration Department to inform what considerations are appropriate for their purchases. Possible Considerations for the Environmental Impact of a purchase are:  Energy - Does this purchase and its use utilize more energy, same amount of energy, or reduce energy? How much energy consumption or savings?  Water – Does this purchase and its use utilize more water, same amount of water, or a reduction of water? How much water consumption or savings (in gallon or acre-feet)?  Is this a replacement or a new product/service?  What are the costs related to managing and disposing of this product? Manufacturing Distribution Use Disposal Sourcing Raw Materials Manufacturing Distribution Use Disposal Water Energy Carbon Material Waste Page | 5  Material Waste – Does this purchase and its use create more, same amount or a reduction of waste? When we are done using it, where will this product/material go?  Natural Resources – Is there an impact to other natural resources (wildlife habitat, trees, soil, and/or air quality)?  Carbon – Is there a carbon footprint estimation for this item?  Certification(s) – Does this product have a certification from the approved list in the environmental purchasing policy? What certification? c. Community Impact The ultimate purpose of all City purchasing is to benefit the Edina community. The Community Impact of a purchase can reflect the impact that filling an organizational need will have on the community, how a purchase impacts a specific demographic within the Edina community or how the purchase affects the Edina community over time. The City has a vested interested in allocating funding to equitably serve residents in the Edina community. All expenditures of public funds are tied to a public purpose; the Community Impact section on the Purchase Evaluation is a space for staff to articulate how a purchase meets that purpose. Possible Considerations for the Community Impact of a purchase are:  What are the human resources needed to manage and dispose of this purchase?  Does this purchase support a particular demographic in the community?  Does this purchase have a long term or short term impact on Edina residents? Authorization Phase The Authorization Phase is the final phase before purchase. The purchase authorization workflow is outlined in Table 1. The City Manager acts as the City’s chief purchasing agent and has the unilateral power to authorize or delegate authorization for purchases under $20,000. Purchases under $10,000 may be made with a purchasing card (p-card) or invoice. Purchases over $10,000 require both a Purchase Authorization and a Purchase Evaluation form. The City Manager grants authority to Department Directors to manage department budget including documentation for purchases that are included in the approved City Budget and to assign department spending thresholds. Purchases over $20,000 must be approved by City Council according to Minnesota Statute 412.691. The mayor must sign ordinances, contracts authorized by the council, and written orders for payment of claims that have been audited and allowed by the council. These are ministerial duties, and the mayor may not refuse to sign if the purpose, approval, and form are legally correct and complete per Minnesota Statutes 412.191 and 412.201. The Purchase Authorization form should advance through the authorization workflow. Department directors, in partnership with the Finance Department, set spending thresholds for purchasers within their departments. By doing so, department directors may delegate authority Page | 6 to authorize purchases up to the set amount to employees. Purchasers are only allowed to authorize funds from within their own department’s budget. In the instance of the need for funds outside of one’s department budget, the purchaser should partner with an approved purchasing agent from the necessary department/fund. Once the final authorization has been granted, the purchaser should submit one copy of the Purchase Authorization to the vendor for processing and retain a copy for attachment to the invoice when it is returned to the purchaser. Payment Phase The Payment Phase reflects the purchasing process. Invoicing for purchases follows the workflow defined by departments for their particular needs. Requests to alter invoicing workflow should be directed to the Finance Department. All payments for purchases and services must be made within 35 days according to Minnesota Statute 471.425. All public work contracts over $100,000 require the City to obtain both a payment bond and a performance bond per Minnesota Statute 574.26. Payment and performance bonds protect the City as well as subcontractors and persons providing labor and materials. When a contract for public work is let, the amount of the bonds needs to be equal to the contract price. If the contract price increases due to change orders, unforeseen conditions, cost overruns or any other reason after the contract is signed, the City has the option of increasing the amount of the contractor’s bond. Consideration may be given for the percentage of the contract that is complete in relation to the contractor’s bond and the increase in the contract price. When assigning payment codes, purchasers should code according to the most accurate line item associated with the purchase. In the instance of a particular line item exceeding the budgeted amount, department directors are responsible for managing the allocation of funding to other department line items to ensure that purchases do not put the department as a whole over budget. When an invoice over $10,000 is returned to the purchaser for coding, the purchaser will upload the Purchase Evaluation and Purchase Authorization forms completed for that purchase along with the invoice. Date: February 22, 2017 Agenda Item #: V. To:Chair & Commissioners of the Edina HRA Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott Neal, Executive Director Item Activity: Subject:4416 Valley View Road - Status Update Discussion Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 CITY OF EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested, for discussion only. INTRODUCTION: This item deals with the potential sale of real estate. Two different concepts have been considered since a Request for Proposal was issued in 2016. Staff will summarize the process to date. ATTACHMENTS: Description 4416 Valley View Process to date February 22, 2017 Chair and Members of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager 4416 Valley View Road – Status and Overview Information / Background: The City acquired the parcel at 4416 Valley View Road fifteen years ago. The parcel has remained vacant since the former service station was demolished. Last year, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) issued a Request for Proposals with the intention of enabling new development that is consistent with the recently adopted Small Area Plan and returning the parcel to the tax rolls. Two parties have shown considerable interest in the site. Each party could include the City-owned parcel as part of a multi-parcel development that brings considerable reinvestment to Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue. A closed session is tentatively scheduled on March 21st to discuss the possible sale of real estate. This agenda item is presented in advance to answer questions regarding the process employed to identify viable options. The recent actions are summarized in the following pages. Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 STAFF REPORT Page 2 Date Action or Event Direction Given May 2014 to March 2015 Several neighborhood meetings and Plan Commission meeting Preparation of draft Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan March 19, 2015 City Council meeting Adopt final version of Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Plan April 19, 2016 HRA Work Session Discussed issuing RFP for new development on vacant parcels at Valley View & Kellogg (NW corner) July 12,2016 Issued RFP NA August 5, 2016 Deadline for Proposals One proposal received from Gatehouse Properties/McGlynn Partners September 7, 2016 HRA Work Session (Closed) Staff presented Gatehouse/McGlynn concept for consideration (attached), also noted that developer was willing to modify some terms if necessary. This proposal was considered to not conform to the Small Area Plan and was rejected. It was suggested that staff reach out to immediate neighbors (Noonan Construction and Edina Housing Foundation) to see if better options could be pursued. September 22, 2016 Edina Housing Foundation meeting Staff discussed redevelopment options for the site. The EHF was not interested in developing the 4416 parcel on their own but remained interested in selling their vacant lot if that was helpful to encourage good development on the block. September 23, 2016 Meeting with Noonan Construction They are interested in developing the site with small commercial with apartments above and townhouses to better transition between the commercial and residential uses. October 13, 2016 Planning Commission – sketch plan Developer presented a revised concept for consideration. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Date Action or Event Direction Given October 18, 2016 HRA Work Session (Closed) Staff presented Noonan Construction concept for site (attached). It was suggested that this concept be distributed for “sketch plan” review to solicit comments from neighbors and Planning Commission regarding scale and re-zoning. November 15, 2016 HRA Work Session (Closed) Staff presented a comparison of the Noonan and Gatehouse concepts for discussion of real estate sale. It was affirmed that staff should continue to explore the Noonan concept through the “sketch plan” phase to see if it is generally desirable. January 25, 2017 Planning Commission – sketch plan Generally favorable comments with requests for more information about details. No opposition to re-zoning. Concern about proximity of commercial building to street. February 2, 2017 Neighborhood Meeting Developer presented the concept for consideration. General favorable comments about scale. No opposition to re-zoning. Concerns about street traffic and placement of commercial building. February 7, 2017 City Council – sketch plan Developer presented the concept for consideration. Mixed opinions were received. February 22, 2017 HRA Meeting Status Update presented March 21, 2017 HRA Work Session - Tentative If desired, could discuss real estate options in closed session. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Excerpts from Small Area Plan STAFF REPORT Page 5 STAFF REPORT Page 6 Proposal from Gatehouse Properties/McGlynn Partners (submitted 8-5-2016) STAFF REPORT Page 7 Revised Concept by Gatehouse Properties/McGlynn Partners Submitted October 3, 2016 STAFF REPORT Page 8 Proposal from Noonan Construction (submitted 9-30-2016) Date: February 22, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI. To:Chair & Commissioners of the Edina HRA Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Redevelopment of Southdale Library Site - Project Update Discussion Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Established 1974 CITY OF EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action requested; for discussion purposes. INTRODUCTION: The Edina HRA is actively working with Hennepin County to prepare a Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposal for the County property located at 7001 York Avenue. This work was authorized in September 2016. Staff will present a status update and would like to pose some questions for discussion and consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description 7001 York HRA Update 2-22-2017 The CITY of EDINA Southdale Library Site Preliminary Redevelopment Planning Update to Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 1)Progress to Date 2)Summary of Preferences & Concepts 3)Three Topics for Consideration February 22, 2017 The CITY of EDINA •Market Study •Maxfield Research •Environmental Study •Braun Intertec •Idea Gathering •Public Open Houses (large group format) •Focus Group discussions •Meetings with Staff (Edina, Richfield & Hennepin) •Concept Testing / Community Preferences •Public Workshops (small group format) www.EdinaMN.gov 2 Progress to Date The CITY of EDINA •900+ Postcards to nearby residents in Edina & Richfield •70+ Posters in Edina, Richfield, SW Mpls & Bloomington •Announcements at Edina & Richfield City Council Meetings •Online Discussion at Speak Up Edina www.EdinaMN.gov/SouthdaleLibrarySite 3 Community Engagement The CITY of EDINA •Social Media •Facebook ads, Nextdoor, etc. •Traditional Media •Sun Current, Finance & Commerce. Etc. •Online •Edina, Richfield and Hennepin County websites www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Community Engagement www.EdinaMN.gov/SouthdaleLibrarySite The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Many thoughtful ideas & valid concerns •Regional Library is vital resource •More green space desired •Possible opportunity for new community facility •Possible opportunity for new cultural amenity (museum, performing or traditional arts) •Small scale retail/restaurants preferred •Is there an apartment bubble? •Will traffic be worsened? •Will new buildings be out of scale or out of character? •Will new architecture be bland or dull? The CITY of EDINA Top Ten Ideas from Dec. Open Houses www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA Key Themes from Jan. Workshop www.EdinaMN.gov 7 The CITY of EDINA Key Themes from Jan. Workshop, continued www.EdinaMN.gov 8 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Beginning to Shape a Vision The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 10 Beginning to Shape a Vision The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 11 Beginning to Shape a Vision The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 12 Beginning to Shape a Vision The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 13 Beginning to Shape a Vision The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 14 Revised Site Concept 1 Library on York Ave Central commons area 2-4 stories on Xerxes 5-6 stories on York 30-50 ft setbacks Underground parking The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 15 Revised Site Concept 1 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 16 Revised Site Concept 1 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 17 Revised Site Concept 1 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 18 Revised Site Concept 1 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 19 Revised Site Concept 1 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 20 Revised Site Concept 2 Library on Xerxes Ave Central commons area 2-4 stories on Xerxes 5-6 stories on York 30-50 ft setbacks Underground & structured parking The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 21 Revised Site Concept 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 22 Revised Site Concept 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 23 Revised Site Concept 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 24 Revised Site Concept 2 The CITY of EDINA •Define specific needs of new Hennepin County Library •Convene Advisory Task Force •Issue Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals www.EdinaMN.gov 25 Next Steps Anticipated Dates – Subject to Change The CITY of EDINA Discussion #1 Should the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) be considered to maximize the community benefit from this site? Community Preferences Impact Budget •Increase Costs •Hidden parking •Community green space •Affordable housing •Lower Revenue •Low-rise construction www.EdinaMN.gov 26 Topics to Consider The CITY of EDINA Discussion #2 Should the HRA investigate the purchase of a portion of the site and seek to develop a new apartment building with affordable rents? •Edina seeks to increase affordable housing and may have funds available for land acquisition •Community preference seems to be for new apartments with affordable rents geared toward current residents www.EdinaMN.gov 27 Topics to Consider The CITY of EDINA Discussion #2 Should the HRA investigate the purchase of a portion of the site and seek to develop a new apartment building with affordable rents? www.EdinaMN.gov 28 Topics to Consider Mixed Use library/apartment in Milwaukee and Aeon’s Rose affordable apartments in Minneapolis HRA could purchase land and partner with developer to own and operate the building. The CITY of EDINA Discussion #3 Should the HRA investigate the purchase or lease of a portion of the site and seek to construct and operate a new Arts Facility or similar public amenity? •Edina Art Center facility is aging and would require significant investment to meet future program expectations •Community preference expressed for additional community programming on the site to complement Library www.EdinaMN.gov 29 Topics to Consider The CITY of EDINA Discussion #3 Should the HRA investigate the purchase or lease of a portion of the site and seek to construct and operate a new Arts Facility or similar public amenity? www.EdinaMN.gov 30 Topics to Consider The City and County also share ownership of a single building in Grandview. Each party operates their programs independently.