HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-12-09 Park Board PacketAGENDA
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PARK BOARD MEETING
BRAEMAR ARENA
EHA ROOM
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
7 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
11. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes — Regular meeting on Monday, Nov. 10, 2014
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT
During "Community Comment," the Park Board will invite residents to share relevant issues or
concerns. Individuals must limit -their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number
of speakers on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are
elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should
not expect the Chair or Board Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board
might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Braemar Golf Course Driving Range and Executive Course Plan
B. Park System Strategic Plan Focus Group
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
A. Council Updates
VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
IX. STAFF COMMENTS
X. ADJOURNMENT
The city of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the
way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in
advance of the meeting.
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA PARK BOARD
HELD AT CITY HALL
November 10, 2014
7 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Gieseke called the meeting to order at 7:13 p.m.
11. ROLL CALL
Answering roll call were Members Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick.
Member Cella arrived at 8:39 p.m.
Student Members present: Colwell, Chowdhury
Absent: Downing, Greene, Segreto
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Member Jones asked to switch Item C with Item A.
Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Steel, to switch Item C with Item A
on the agenda.
Ayes: Members Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick.
Motion Carried.
Member Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Jones, approving the meeting
agenda as amended.
Ayes: Members Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick.
Motion Carried.
IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA
Member Jones made a motion, seconded by Member Jacobson, approving the consent
agenda as follows:
W.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board meeting of Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2014
Ayes: Members Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick
Motion Carried.
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT
None
VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
VI.C. Redevelopment Planning for Former Public Works Site Update
Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager, gave the presentation on redevelopment planning for
the former Public Works site.
Member Jones asked what the Park Board involvement would be in this process. Mr. Neuendorf stated
at this point, it is up to the Park Board. The City Council has directed that a portion of this site be for
public use and a portion for private use. He assumed the public portion would be some type of parks
and rec facility.
Member Jacobson asked how the Lid project would be part of the Grandview project or would they be
separate projects. Mr. Neuendorf stated these would be separate projects. The Lid was a proposal to
be innovative on how they integrate transportation and land use. He noted the Lid project, at the
earliest, is ten years away.
Member Steel wondered if they could pull data from the needs assessment that would be relevant to
that project and cross -tabulate it as far as ages and location of residents. That would help them to see
from a parks & recreation standpoint what residents are looking for. Mr. Neuendorf stated they could
definitely look into it and indicated that it is an important study with a couple of questions in it that are
directly relevant to the site. He stated he was not sure about the statistical significance of this.
Member Steel noted it was her understanding that they received so many results that in certain points
cross -tabulation is not going to be valuable but for the large majority that data should be very valid.
Member Jones stated one of the specific questions that had to do with Grandview showed that 73
percent of Edina residents support a new indoor community space on that site. She stated this process
has been going for a long time and there was a lot of public engagement. She thought a lot of work
went into this to create a good framework. She thought that the council and Mr. Neuendorf should
understand that the people that worked on that as well as the people that filled out the surveys really
want the city to honor their time and work. She thought it seems that every time this process begins
again what happened in the past does not matter. She thought the public has spoken and they want a
public amenity. She stated that would be her expectation and of the people that participated.
Member Deeds seconded what was said. He stated there is very little public space left and very little
developable space in the city. The long-term benefit of investment in amenities to the broader real
estate prices in the city will probably benefit more from building the amenities up than from another
restaurant, apartments or condominiums. He noted they have very little in the way of park or public
space left to make use of and thought if they really thought this through and consider how they
compete with other suburbs in the area and what they compete on and if they do not remain a
destination suburb for people moving into the Twin Cities, they cannot keep their property values. He
thought this needed to be taken seriously and thought about. He thought a long-term benefit to the
city, a good public space, probably has higher returns than another shopping center.
Member Steel asked what has resulted with the school district discussions. Mr. Neuendorf stated so
far he has met with the Parent Leadership Commission and given them the same invitation for
discussion as he gave the Park Board. He talked to the school district on several different occasions.
Member Steel wondered where they fit into this puzzle. Mr. Neuendorf thought there was a good
relationship between the city and the school district about working together. As they begin the
process about this site, he was making the same invitation to all of the different groups to come
together and decide how they can work best together and what is the real need of the site and what
are they willing to pay for on this site and how can they maximize the efficiency and do it most
effectively.
Mr. Neuendorf indicated the school district is looking to redevelop the bus garage in the near future to
accommodate new buses that will not fit in the garage. He thought the city and school district were
looking at different time frames and he imagined that in the next generation both properties will look
differently but they will probably occur one after another.
Member Jones thought she saw a request for three million dollars from Mr. Neuendorf to buy that site
in the most recent Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Neuendorf stated there is a draft Capital
Improvement Plan the City Council will look at during their next meeting. He put a placeholder in the
plan but it was not to buy the existing site.
2
Member Jones asked if the City Council has taken any other action with respect to the Public Works
site besides passing the framework. Mr. Neuendorf stated there were a lot of different actions taken.
He reviewed the actions made by the City Council. He thought when this comes back in the spring for
review there will be more options to discuss and choose from.
VI.A. Golf Course Projects Update
Joe Abood, General Manager of Braemer Golf Course, gave a presentation on the golf course update.
Member Deeds asked what the target for completion of the driving range and the redesigned executive
course is. Mr. Abood stated the completion should be done by the summer of 2016. Member
McCormick asked where the leagues would go that used the Fred Richards Course and did not commit
to Braemer Golf Course. Mr. Abood did not provide a specific response but stated that there are
several other courses in the area.
Member Jones was wondering what the scope of the task force is. Mr. Abood stated everything that is
in the scope of this project is for the betterment of the park as a whole. They are looking at anything
that would make this a better amenity for the community. Member Jones indicated she would highly
encourage more paths and walking paths. Mr. Abood indicated that is the goal of the task force; they
want to bring people into the facility, not just golfers. They want to make it a place in the community
that people can feel proud of and visit.
Member Deeds asked if there was any movement on vendors in terms of the restaurant. Mr. Abood
stated there is some movement, nothing is finalized and they are still in the contracting phase but it
does look promising. Ms. Kattreh hoped to have a lease agreement for City Council approval by next
Tuesday.
Member Gieseke stated some of the concerns he heard in closing down the Fred was how they can do
right for all of the user groups, in particular the youth, seniors and beginner groups. He wondered
what they were envisioning to make sure they accommodate all of the groups that used the Fred. Mr.
Abood stated they are trying to engage all of the people that were playing at the Fred and let them
know there is availability at Braemar and the programs they are offering are excellent.
Member Steel recommended updating and boosting the website on the Braemar project to which Mr.
Abood replied he would get that updated. Member Deeds asked if there was information on the
website with regards to Richard Mandell and thought maybe they should show some of the golf
courses he has designed in order to generate some excitement for Braemar. Mr. Abood stated they
will get that information on the website. Member Steel thought this should also be shared on social
media. Member Jones stated she has been hearing really good reviews and welcomed Mr. Abood. Mr.
Abood indicated he was very excited to be in the community and felt Braemar has the potential to do
extremely well in the future and they are on the right path to doing that.
VI.B. Staff Recommended 2015 — 2019 Capital Improvement Plan
Ms. Kattreh gave a Power Point presentation on the 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan.
Member Deeds asked for clarification on the priority listings on the two pages Ms. Kattreh gave the
Park Board. Ms. Kattreh stated those were from the Finance Committee. They ranked their list of
priorities from I to 71. Member Deeds asked what Ms. Kattreh's top priorities were. Ms. Kattreh
indicated this was a difficult process for them. They are looking at a park system with some aging
infrastructure, park shelter buildings in need of replacement along with playgrounds that are in need of
replacement. She indicated she was eager to get through the strategic planning process so they can
prioritize and put budgets and years to some of these projects. There is a high focus on the Braemer
Park project this year.
k3
Member McCormick asked regarding the golf course piece, the course renovation is a five and she
wondered if this was a lower priority. Ms. Kattreh stated they are recommending the course
renovation not be done in the next two years. Anything that is ranked one through four is likely to be
funded in the next two years of the CIP and they are not going to be ready to do any renovations to
Braemer for two years.
Ms. Kattreh reviewed with the Park Board how the CIP plan works.
Member Jacobson asked regarding the Fred, how Ms. Kattreh would foresee the funding for the Fred
conversion. Ms. Kattreh indicated that would not likely come out of the CIP but that a conversation
will take place once the Master Plan starts next summer. Member Jones asked if the answer would
also apply to the Grandview project. Ms. Kattreh indicated that was correct. Member Deeds asked if
the dome project was also a separate project. Ms. Kattreh indicated that was a separate bond project.
Member Jones indicated she had a question on the park shelter buildings because she thought they
needed improvements. She asked if they agreed to putting on siding and roofs, did that mean they
would be removed from the CIP for replacement for an indeterminate number of years. Ms. Kattreh
stated that is one part of the CIP that has been a little misleading. When they submitted their CIP
projects as far as the shelter buildings she wanted to make sure that the Park Board and City Council
understood the financial liability that is outstanding with the shelter buildings knowing they were not
likely to get funding within the CIP to replace the buildings because there is not enough funding in the
CIP to be able to do that. She noted it was determined by their Facility Manager that the roofs and
shelter buildings should not be delayed longer because of their condition. They felt like it was in the
city's best interest to spend approximately $16,000 per shelter building to at least keep them safe and
functioning for the next few years. Ms. Kattreh stated she would like to wait to do maintenance on the
shelter buildings until they finish the Parks & Recreation Strategic Plan and see how the Park Board and
City Council feel about the buildings and then talk about a funding source for these and then prioritize
the buildings and maintenance that needs to be done.
Member Gieseke asked what the need is for a new snowmobile and what is it used for now. Ms.
Kattreh stated it is actually a show mobile and is like a portable stage. She thought this would be
another great discussion for the Park Board and they should decide if the city should invest in a
portable stage they can move around to different parks for events and performances or would they be
better off investing in amphitheaters in different parks. Member Steel stated the meaningful discussion
is the funding sources because she would not be confident in the future if they have unstable funding.
She also noted that trails were a big item on the survey and assumed they would have some repairs
and wondered how they would fund those. Ms. Kattreh stated there is actually a budget line for trails
in the park maintenance budget so they have the ability to maintain their current trails within the park
budget.
Member Jones noted the list for playground equipment in the CIP for replacement in 2015 shows some
playground equipment being replaced before other playground equipment that was scheduled to be
done sooner. Ms. Kattreh thought that would be a great thing to address as part of the strategic plan.
Member Gieseke thought they needed to also address equitability of equipment in general in their
strategic planning.
Member Jones wondered if they were metering the irrigation they install. Ms. Kattreh indicated she
could put together a study on which ones are metered and which ones are not. She thought most of
the general park facilities are not metered and more of the enterprise facilities are metered. Member
Jones suggested they install metering as they put in new irrigation. Ms. Kattreh agreed.
4
VI.D. Community Needs Assessment Study
Ms. Kattreh gave a Power Point presentation on the Community Needs Assessment Study.
Member Gieseke asked if they had any idea of how Edina compares to similar cities. Ms. Kattreh stated
in the report there are specific benchmarks and Edina is compared to some of the suburbs around
Chicago on the north and west side. In a lot of cases they are really close to the higher percentages
but have a little work to do in order to improve. Member Steel asked what the next step is in the
process. Ms. Kattreh stated they have a lot of the cross tabs available in the report and she thought
the next step would be to have a more detailed strategic discussion with the planning consultants as to
how to use that cross tab data.
Member Jones wondered what people meant by trails. Ms. Kattreh thought in terms of their survey it
was used pretty generically and as they are looking at the strategic plan it will be critical that they look
at all types of trails. Generally it was vague in terms of the survey. They did hear about biking, walking
and nature trails along with connectivity. Member Jacobson stated as she was reading through the
results she realized there was a need to accommodate more walking. Ms. Kattreh agreed.
VI.E. Park System Strategic Plan Update
Ms. Kattreh updated the Park Board on the Parks & Recreation Strategic Plan and went through the
schedule.
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
VII.A. Council Updates
No discussion.
V11.B. Other Correspondence
No discussion.
VII.C. Veteran's Memorial Committee, June 20, 2014 Minutes and Aug. 29, 2014 Minutes
Ms. Kattreh stated the construction of the Veteran's Memorial is well underway and coming along well.
Vlll. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Member Geiseke stated in regard to the Veteran's Memorial Committee meeting, there is a note about
a potential name change and he wondered what that was in regards to. Ms. Kattreh indicated she has
not been involved in that conversation and cannot comment on that.
Member McCormick asked if the work plan was approved. Ms. Kattreh indicated it was not approved
yet but would be by the end of the year.
IX. STAFF COMMENTS
Ms. Kattreh went through staff comments and updates with the Park Board.
X. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Gieseke moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:01 p.m.
Ayes: Members Cella, Deeds, Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Jacobson, McCormick
Motion Carried.
Meeting adjourned at 9:01 p.m.
To: Park Board
From: Joe Abood, General Manager
Braemar Golf Course
Date: December 9, 2014
A--' �\1
v
0 •
moa 8B
Agenda Item #: VLA.
Subject: Braemar Golf Course Driving Range and Executive Course Plan
Action Requested:
Review and comment on the Driving Range and Executive Course final plan
Information/Background:
Action ❑
Discussion 0
Information ❑
The proposed design of the driving range is being expanded to increase its usage and to enhance drainage
and turf conditions. The proposed range will be over 300 yards long and will accommodate up to 58 golfers
at one time. New target greens will be added and a new irrigation system will improve turf conditions and
will reduce maintenance time and expense.
The Executive Course will be redesigned and rerouted to offer nine par 3 holes with yardages ranging from
72 yards to 191 yards. To make the course more enjoyable for kids and the entry-level golfers, the course
will be reconfigured to minimize sand hazards and forced carries over wetlands. All of the greens, tees and
bunkers are proposed to be reconstructed and the fairways will be re -grassed to improve turf quality and to
provide a more consistent experience for golfers. The proposed greens will be enlarged to allow for two
flags on each green - similar to the experience enjoyed at the former Fred Richards Golf Course.
In April 2014 the city hired Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects to complete the driving range design and
develop construction and bidding documents for the renovation. In May the city hired Short Elliott
Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) to complete wetland delineations and to provide suggestions for wetland mitigation
for this project. The wet weather in May and June significantly delayed the wetland delineation process.
SEH completed the wetland delineation report and submitted the application to the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District on June 5, 2014. A site review with Barr Engineering (representing the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District) was conducted on June 24th to verify the delineation report. Verification was delayed
because many of the areas on the course were too wet or completely under water. In May 2014 The Army
Corps of Engineers issued a Public Notice that the permitting process would take at least four months. At
that time, staff recommended pushing the construction schedule back to July 2015. The original schedule
for the Braemar Driving Range and Executive Course renovation called for construction to begin in early
August 2014 with anticipated construction completion by late fall 2014.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
Page 2
The updated project schedule is to begin construction on July 7, 2015. Kevin Norby, Golf Course Architect,
and his team of consultants are in the final stages of environmental permitting and design. The project will
be ready for the bidding process just after the New Year and the timing indicates a favorable financial
response for the City of Edina.
Project Schedule
December 2015
Finalize design and bid package
January/February 2015
Obtain permits and request authorization from City Council to bid project
January/February 2015
Release plans for bidding
February 2015
Select contractor and award project
July 7, 2015
Begin construction
October 1, 2015
Complete construction
October 2015 - May 2016
Grow -in and maturation
May 1, 2016
Open new driving range — mats only
June 1, 2016
New par 3 course open for play
Stormwater Treatment Recommendations - Barr Engineering - As part of this effort, the city asked Barr to
provide information to the golf course architect and design engineers regarding floodplain restrictions, and
provide recommendations for stormwater treatment and management of the natural areas, with special
emphasis on buffer management.
Redesign and construction of the Driving Range and Executive Course presents an opportunity to provide
additional treatment of stormwater from the golf course and adjacent roadways and residential areas prior
to the stormwater reaching downstream wetlands and the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek. Currently,
stormwater from approximately 52 acres of residential area northeast of the course is conveyed via the
trunk storm sewer along Gleason Road to a small wetland on the northeast edge of the executive course
(north of Braemar Boulevard), then to the long, narrow pond within sub watershed NMSB-85b. Pond
NMSB_85b also receives flows from NMSB_7, which has a large tributary drainage area. An additional 16
acres of residential area to the east of the Executive Course is currently conveyed to the wetland located
south of Braemar Boulevard and east of John Harris Drive (sub watershed NMSB_57, Figure 1). Since
stormwater from the nearby residential areas east of the course receives no treatment prior to discharge to
the Braemar wetlands, the focus of our assessment was to identify opportunities to provide additional
treatment of runoff from these areas. Ross Bintner, the City Environmental Engineer, has reviewed and
provided input on the design and proposed recommendations.
Attachments:
Driving Range and Executive Course Plan
Project Budget
Stormwater Treatment Options
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
Page 3
Feet
-eatnerV tiaboneberSizetlS C 250 FOt7
a EXISMg MOM StmicLUre
EX%rng Storm SL-Wef 1 kmh = 500 feet Figure 1
BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE:
EXISTING CONDITIONS
City of Edina, Minnesota
11117/14
HERFORT NORBY
Golf Course Architects, LLC.
Braemar Golf Practice Facility
8/12/14
Estimate to renovate the existing practice facility and Instructional facility.
Final Concept Plan
Practice Range & Related Executive Course Improvements
Low Range
High Range
Mobilization
$ 10,000.00 - $
15,000.00
Strip & replace topsoil (15,000 cy)
37,500.00 -
45,000.00
Mass grading (40,000 cy)
100,000.00 -
120,000.00
Wetland Mitigation
Wetland construction (53,200 cy)
26,600.00 -
39,900.00
Wetland buffer (54,000 sf)
10,800.00 -
13,500.00
Post construction monitoring
15,000.00 -
20,000.00
Erosion control
24,000.00 -
30,000.00
Erosion control blanket (20,000 sf)
Slit fence (3,000 If)
Tree & stump removal (3 acres)
13,500.00 -
18,000.00
Demolition (paving, fence, etc.)
10,000.00 -
12,500.00
Reconstruct 4 putting greens w/ drain tile, 12" greensmix (16,000 sf)
104,000.00 -
120,000.00
17,050 sf target greens
8,525.00 -
10,230.00
2,600 sf target bunkers
2,600.00 -
3,900.00
New range tees (124,722 sf) w/ 4" topmix, shaping
137,194.20 -
149,666.40
39,000 sf Executive Course Golf Tees w/ 4" topmix, shaping
78,000.00 -
97,500.00
8,915 sf Championship Course Golf Tees w/ 4" topmix, shaping
17,830.00 -
22,287.50
New and rebuilt bunkers on executive course (2,600 sf)
13,000.00 -
18,200.00
Concrete tee line with mats
5,130 sf Concrete -
23,085.00 -
28,215.00
100 Mats
45,000.00
50,000.00
Fairways & roughs (12 acres)
30,000.00 -
33,000.00
Fill existings sand bunkers (10,500 sf)
10,500.00 -
15,750.00
Sod installation around greens and tees (8,000 sy)
24,000.00 -
28,000.00
Drainage (drain pipe, catch basins, flared end sections)
70,000.00 -
80,000.00
Irrigation system for range and 4 renovated holes
155,000.00 -
170,500.00
Materials ('"155 heads, pipe, wire, satellite, valves)
Cart Paths
31,543.75 -
37,852.50
Sub -cut & granular cart path base - 25235 sf
Bituminous paving of cart paths - 25,235 sf
Bituminous cart path curbing at tees & greens
Sub -cut & gravel cart path at range, holes 4 & 8 -11,600 sf
5,800.00 -
8,120.00
Landscaping (trees & shrubs) -
15,000.00 -
20,000.00
Grow -in (fertilizer, erosion control, etc.)
10,000.00 -
12,500.00
Netting (1,100 If)
33,000.00 -
36,300.00
10' High chain link fence (600 If)
12,000.00 -
15,000.00
New lesson building
20,000.00 -
25,000.00
New scorecard
2,000.00 -
2,500.00
Disconnect/reconnect utilities
20,000.00 -
25,000.00
Final design, engineering & permitting
110,000.00 -
130,000.00
Total $ 1,225,477.95 - $ 1,453,421.40
5% Contingency 61,273.90 72,671.07
Total Practice Range Improvements $ 1,286,751.85 - $ 1,526,092.47
Optional Costs
Option to expand the 4 greens by 1,000 sf each to get 5,000 sf avg. " 26,000.00 - 30,000.00
Option to rebuild the 5 remlaning greens at 5,000 sf each * 162,500.00 - 187,500.00
Option: Irrigation system for remianing 5 holes 50,000.00 - 55,000.00
Materials ("'50 heads, pipe, wire, satellite, valves)
Total Optional Costs $ 238,500.00 $ 272,500.00
s The Increased green sizes would allow for 2 flags per green similar to how Fred Richards GC Is currently used.
This estimate is for the reconstruction of the existing driving range and practice facilities including the partial
rerouting and reconstruction of the Executive Course. This estimate includes not only those changes to the
Executive Course which are necessitated by the changes to the driving range project but also those optional
changes which would be required to maintain consistent conditions on the remaining Executive Course holes. This
proposal does not include changes or improvements to the Championship Course other than shown on holes 1 &
10. Since no detailed plans have been prepared, this estimate was prepared using approximate quantities derived
from the Final Concept Plan dated August 12, 2014 and should therefore be considered a "ball park" estimate only.
Kevin Norby, President
W
Herfort Norby Golf Course Architects, LLC.
q Practice Range and 9 -Hole Par 3
`7 0,). Golf Course Improvements
.........
-_--
-_ - /� ./,�✓ ✓iii `i /� ___—_ t — —'- p, \^s •� //
` 4
_
(
New Wetlands & Buffer
r.
4,000 sf Lesson Tee ; '_ • u, V' t ,"`'
10 stalls ,., ,, II �'
( / � .� �..• ^� •. \ \ ,•. a~' / /' AL1 11\Ihi1! I i
10 Il r r_
`) w t�ern
�.,
Expanded Range !It!,\�•
to +300 yds deep
�; � r ����` / � ` � \ \ �"�, f�• j _ '111;11 �'`'` I r
\ -z5o va � �- :' y � al,. �T"h �• � / i I11,'� i II h `'�.
a
1�11110 Os
Target Fairway with
Target Greens &0�,
Bunkers -p�\•
x:150 Yds fi V p 1 '7x"'9? x \ ••'`-tea
( OJI 940.54 � ��O �' O II• ` \� �� 1 ' - n -� --jill�i
pO Yds r'� .In ✓—:'Xq , --
{ 102,800 sf Mai'
n° a \ :• _ r`<_\\ ,' `\r
Range Tee "�/' ;y, �'`";/ _ ; \ 1
58 stalls I
_ w
\nr
\ b J .:
Hok rnr i= Ll1S:d1C. Forward I
• DN"� ` -- - - -- ' 1 3 190 153 108
.i,
::::.., �`�, \\\ `. \ t . \ '� �•' i I ` - ',:.�'° i, � 2 3 164 150 137 r
I-\ ','�� Upgraded Clubhouse 3 3 126 109 89
Site Improvements
/ 4 3 1 1 2 91 72
�, 5 3 158 136 115
JJ
6 3 126 111 88
Main Clubhouse ! / �'\ J'/'I I` lir/iri'i 7 3 178 152 95
�� '•, I I Illl�llii 8 3 123 103 84 /K
1 , 191 160 1_16 �.
,< 1t;•', , I ,; I, •�, '\1,)l�/Min
Total 27 1 368 1 165 904 `
ii
i \ "
.} ... ��, / --,�. ii��/� _<.<.;_, r ?t —s„i 1.,"5 . l ✓ )\ \e i fI -ar / �).//(.r rr... /( 1,//.'% j%//l /l/�r / ll%li'.ll� l/r11/ll/l/ll'//�,/! j / ,,yi 1 I t/i(l '(I•I/ If
200 300 FTI /�o 100
II
Y
�
sD Braemar Golf Course Date Decembers zota biThisplanandih,dd—prsrepre—teaheraovinarathapmpadyo[H,d,lNorbyG,I(Coarse
Golf Course Architect: Designedhy KN&JS nrcnhacts.useo,niepienshallroauirepdb, wrineeapprelbyNorfodNarbyGOC,ersbnrcndocrs.
G\ 'y 6364 Jo he Harris Drive Ihereby epeciy that this plan, specificatldd, orrepod Drawn by, JS
Edina, Minnesota 55439 IL;w+owr N�orse was prepared by orondardrydirecteupe,irldh Y'
(952) 903-5750 C — and mau am d registered Landscape Architect Revisions ■
City of Edina Berth spnnesatap,MlpnaseU Routing Plan
o Parks & Recreation Department too easehe k, street, 8 zoo
- p Chaska, MN 55318
52) 361-o6aa n
4601 W. 50th Street (96: oale:12/03114 Fegistrarona: 20144
Edina, Minnesota 55424
To: Park Board
From: Ann Kattreh
Parks & Recreation Director
Date: December 9, 2014
Subject: Park System Strategic Plan Focus Group
Action Requested:
None. Discussion only.
A,
OV
o e
ofiP0 /
1888
Agenda Item #: VI.B.
Action ❑
Discussion
Information ❑
Information / Background:
The purpose of the focus group meetings, like the one the Park Board will participate in, will be to identify
strengths, future needs, major issues, and opportunity areas for the system to ensure that the master plan
addresses them. This will be an interactive dialogue with each of the Park Board members and the Park
Board as a whole. Terry Minarik from Confluence and Jeff Bransford from Pros Consulting will facilitate this
agenda item.
The focus group schedule for next week is as follows:
Tuesday, Dec. 9
8 — 9 a.m.
9:30 - 10:30 a.m
I I a.m. — noon
I — 2 p.m.
2:30 - 3:30 p.m.
4 — 5 p.m.
Wednesday, Dec. 10
8 — 9 a.m.
9:30 - 10:30 a.m.
I I a.m. - noon
I — 2 p.m.
2:30 - 3:30 p.m.
4 — 5 p.m.
Athletic Associations
School Staff and Community Ed
Athletics
Arts
Environment
Businesses
Park Maintenance
Neighborhoods
Staff — Department Directors and Managers
Civic Groups
Recreation Facility Managers, Recreation Supervisors and Administrative Staff
Boards and Commissions
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
I
To: Park Board
From: Ann Kattreh
Parks & Recreation Director
Date: December 9, 2014
Subject: City Council Updates
Action Requested:
No Action is Necessary
Information / Background:
Agenda Item #: VILA.
Action ❑
Discussion ❑
Information 0
Please see the City Council Updates from their Nov. 19 and Dec. 2 City Council Meetings.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424
City Council Updates
November 18, 2014
• The City Council began its evening with a work session to receive an update from staff on
the proposed 2015-2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Council Members did not make
any changes to the proposed CIP. The next step for the proposed CIP is a public hearing
on Dec. 2.
• Approved a $24,180 purchase of new HVAC equipment for Centennial Lakes Park.
• Approved a contract with Tin Fish to become the official restaurant vendor at Braemar
Clubhouse, starting in April 2015. The City Council also authorized staff to move forward
with remodeling the clubhouse to accommodate the new Tin Fish operation.
• Approved a new Donations, Sponsorship and Advertising Policy. Employee orientation
about the new policy will be coming soon.
• Set interview dates for the 2015 advisory board and commission selection process.
December 2, 2014
• Approved new parks and recreation fees for 2015.
• Approved a new official meeting date calendar for 2015 (please see back).
• Conducted a public hearing on the staffs proposed 2015 operating budget. The City Council is
scheduled to take final action on the proposed budget at its Dec. 16 meeting. One person testified
at the hearing. The person's concern was about how the Assessing Division assessed property
values in neighborhoods experiencing residential redevelopment.
• Selected March 9 as the date of the City Council's annual meeting with boards and commissions.
• Selected April 29 as the date for the annual Volunteer Recognition Reception.
• Approved an ordinance amending chapter 4 and 24 of the City Code, outlining where and how
alcohol can be sold in the city.
^
205
CITY OFED|NACOUNCIL, ADVISORY BRDS.COMS.COMMS. MEETINGS, HOLIDAYS ELECTION DATES
| —|H�iU�m N����Q�Cuun�| 0���N���UnKe �--lP|nCvmm HP F---lTmoCom [---lpo�B�
�� ���� m|no|N�� L] L--� L]
|^,| Indicates areligious holiday's observance
[-��E� �D Health K���| FI
�---1
��_� o ay oo� 8���Human �RCom [� E&E Comm �]Adx & Culture Comm
JANUARY
wwwwwan
11
man
P151
NOMMMMM
mmmawan
9
12
14
16
18
19
11
12
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
31
mmumamw
MMUMOMW
rT_
28
JULY
wwwwwan
11
man
P151
NOMMMMM
mmmawan
9
12
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
15
16
17
11
Em
18
MWOM
%mom
20 22
23
24
mm
26
27 29
30
31
mmumamw
MMUMOMW
rT_
28
29
30
MMMEMMOI
MWOMMMMI
JULY
owwwwaa
11
man
P151
NOMMMMM
mmmmmma
9
12
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
15
16
17
11
12 14
18
19
20 22
23
24
25
26
27 29
30
31
MMUMOMW
rT_
28
29
OCTOBER
owwwwaa
11
man
P151
NOMMMMM
mmmmmma
9
12
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
15
16
17
11
12 14
18
19 21
22
23
24
28
29
wwwommm
22
23
FEBRUARY
owwwwaa
11
man
P151
NOMMMMM
mmmmmma
9
12
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
18
18
19
19
7
28
22
MW
25
womm
27
28
29
wwwommm
22
23
MMUMOMW
rT_
NOVEMBER
owwwwaa
11
man
P151
NOMMMMM
mmmmmma
9
12
13
14
15
16
am
man
20
nman
18
18
19
19
20
wM%Ew
22
MW
25
womm
27
28
29
wwwommm
22
23
MMUMOMW
rT_
28
29
30
31
MWOMMMMI
NOVEMBER
owwwwaa
11
P151
NOMMMMM
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
18
man
20
6
18
18
19
19
20
21
22
MW
25
womm
27
28
29
wwwommm
22
23
26
rT_
28
29
30
31
NOVEMBER
owwwwaa
11
P151
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
6
18
18
19
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
29
30
22
23
MARCH
owwwwaa
11
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
213
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
mmammmm
20
21
22
23
26
rT_
28
29
SEPTEMBER
owwwwaa
41111�
2+3
ann%WROMM
5
6
Em
MEEM
11
20
13
MOMMOMM
17
18
25
19
26
24
mmammmm
20
21
22
23
26
L�7
28
29
30
SEPTEMBER
41111�
2+3
4
5
6
9
11
20
13
14
17
18
25
19
26
24
27
20
21
22
23
26
L�7
28
29
30
31
DECEMBER
6
9
11
12
13
14
1 6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
26
L�7
28
29
30
31
Revised Meeting Schedule for 2015. Dates Subject mChange Revised.- 11/24/2014