Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013-11-12 Park Board Packet
AGENDA CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA PARK BOARD MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:00 p.m. "This Meeting Will Be Televised" CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes — Regular meeting on Tuesday, October 8, 2013 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment, " the Park Board will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS A. Centennial Lakes Promenade Phase 4 B. Yorktown Community Garden Status C. Bike Edina Task Force Representative VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Council Updates B. Founders Day Celebration Invitation VIII. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS IX. STAFF COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL October 8, 2013 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. 11. WELCOME NEW STUDENT MEMBERS Chair Steel welcomed the two new student members, Julie Johnson and Sarah Good. 111. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Jones, Steel, Cella, Segreto, Peterson, Good, Johnson Member Deeds arrived at 7:14 p.m. IV. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Chair Steel asked to add the "Urban Forest Task Force Report" under Reports and Recommendations. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Peterson, approving the addition of the "Urban Forest Task Force Report" to the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Jones, Steel, Cella, Segreto, Peterson. Motion carried. Member Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Cella, approving the amended meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Jones, Steel, Cella, Segreto, Peterson. Motion carried. V. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Peterson made a motion, seconded by Member Cella, approving the consent agenda as follows: V.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of September 10, 2013 Ayes: Members Jones, Steel, Cella, Segreto, Peterson. Motion carried. VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. Vll. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. Quality of Life Survey Results Presentation Bill Morris, Decision Resources, indicated the survey results overall were very positive. He explained the methodology as well as the demographics of the survey. He highlighted some of the findings of the city at large, including the high satisfaction rating of citizens, a "benign" climate about property taxes, and satisfaction with city services. Mr. Morris then highlighted the results from the Parks & Recreation portion of the survey, including the rating of the quality of parks, maintenance of parks, usage of parks, as well as whether the parks or facilities represented the vision of the City of Edina. He indicated 97 percent of households feel the existing recreational facilities are meeting household needs. Mr. Morris described 84 percent of residents do not leave the city to recreate elsewhere. He highlighted the varying levels of support for various new or improved facilities, and the varying levels of support for increased property taxes to pay for new or improved facilities. Chair Steel questioned how to interpret the result that 65 percent have not participated in programming, while 0 percent chose the "I don't know" option. Mr. Morris explained that particularly among older residents, they may be referring to an experience long ago, or may be hearing from children or grandchildren in the community what is going on. He noted that Edina is one of the best - informed communities in the Metro, both in the city surveys and the school district surveys. Chair Steel commented that she would rather weigh the opinions of people who are using programming rather than those who are not. Mr. Morris indicated that when considering a referendum, there will be more people voting who do not use programming than those who do use programming. If the programming or facilities are lagging, that information needs to get out. Dealing with less -than -excellent kinds of things is a hard thing to admit to the public, but the need has to be established before the public will consider supporting a tax increase. Chair Steel asked whether further investigation needs to be done on recreational programming for people not participating. Mr. Morris noted there are two key reasons why people do not participate: lack of time and lack of interest. Member Deeds asked Mr. Morris about general leanings among the public for a $50 per resident property tax increase. Mr. Morris estimated a 40 percent chance of passage in an off-year election. Member Deeds noted that 99 percent level of satisfaction is really over -the -top. He asked what the Board should do with these numbers. Mr. Morris indicated that in order to move the population, it will be essential to frame it as "we are good, but we can be a lot better in these areas". Member Segreto noted a 62 percent opposition to athletic field renovation. Mr. Morris indicated that is very high, especially given the use of the fields. This issue must be framed as more future -oriented, so people start looking forward instead of what exists today. Mr. Morris noted that Edina's population is highly segmented in terms of interest (arts, athletics, performing arts, parks, etc.) Member Jones asked about trends. Mr. Morris indicated Decision Resources has only completed one other survey, in 2011, so there is not enough data to establish trending. He noted there is not as much tax hostility as exists in other communities. Chair Steel questioned whether, going forward, the focus should just be on improving programming quality for existing participants rather than expanding the number of participants. Mr. Morris noted that one trend is an unwillingness to participate in long-term classes. People prefer something occurring for a single day rather than spread out over six or seven days. He noted that real ideas are going to be generated from current participants. 2 VII.B. 2014-2015 Budget Presentation Scott Neal, City Manager, provided an overview of the budget. He noted staff uses two-year operating budgets, and in the off-year staff works primarily on the Capital Improvement Program. Six general themes were identified at the strategic planning meeting: infrastructure, workforce, communications, community vision, aviation noise, and commercial and mixed-use redevelopment. He noted a number of other factors in the budget process, including a 3 percent levy limit imposed from the legislature, a substantial sales tax exemption for many of the city's activities, a 13.3 percent increase in health care costs, increase in the police/fire retirement fund, and requests for additional city staff. Mr. Neal discussed the preliminary proposed tax levy that was approved in September, at the rate of 3 percent. The budget would increase 2.7 percent for 2014 and 4.1 percent in 2015. He explained that in 2013 the city government will spend a little under $90 million and will collect a little over $90 million. Mr. Neal provided a high-level look at Parks & Recreation spending. In 2015 Parks & Recreation will spend $13 million, 90 percent of that occurring in the enterprise funds. Member Deeds asked why Centennial Lakes is an enterprise facility. Mr. Neal responded he is not sure. He noted that the in 2010 City Council asked staff to split Edinborough Park from Centennial Lakes in the budget, and that has been done. The City Council has asked the same question about whether a cost - recovery expectation should exist for Centennial Lakes. Member Deeds commented it would be nice to have more realistic budget numbers presented that include depreciation and capital improvement recovery. Mr. Neal noted Edina has not been able to fully fund the Equipment Replacement Fund since 2008; the city is now at 80 to 85 percent of a fully funded level. In response to a question from Member Deeds, Mr. Neal explained the city has paid off some debt in order to put itself in a position to be able to levy additional monies, if needed, while keeping spending flat. He noted that in 2017 another big debt service payment will be coming off the books as well. Mr. Neal noted two bond issues were sold just a month ago, and the rates were 2.5 and just under 3 percent. Member Peterson asked whether any cities are moving towards a 401K style retirement. Mr. Neal indicated Minnesota statute requires pension -style retirement. In response to a question by Member Peterson about cost recovery goals Mr. Neal indicated there is a lot of data being collected, and it needs to be put into a formula that staff and the Park Board agree on. Chair Steel asked if the legislature will address levy limits again. Mr. Neal stated he does not expect it to be part of the 2015 budgeting. Member Jones asked for a copy of the preliminary budget the City Council passed. Mr. Neal responded affirmatively, noting it is posted on the city's website as well. She also commented if 13 percent is a normal level of the budget to be spent on Parks & Recreation. Mr. Neal indicated the 12 to 15 percent range is a normal range for cities the size of Edina. VII.C. Fees and Charges Ms. Kattreh introduced the fees and charges document, noting a column was added this year for explanations for increases, decreases, and changes. Member Deeds noted the arena is running relatively low recovery rates, and they will probably worsen. Susie Miller, Braemar Arena General Manager, noted the arena is keeping with the market. The prime rate is $205 and Bloomington is $185. On the non -prime season that has increased revenues by about $200,000. She noted a lot of cities are subsidizing the ice arenas at about 80 percent cost recovery. She noted there have been great increases by about 35 percent since 2010. She stated the non -prime ice hours have increased substantially over the last two years. Member Deeds asked how the arena can close the gap. Ms. Miller indicated since depreciation is included in the budget number, the arena cannot substantially increase fees enough to close the gap. Member Jones asked about a new rink. Ms. Miller stated as long as the building costs do not have to be recouped, it would be a net gain because staffing would not have to increase. Member Jones noted energy costs are quite high at the arena. She asked if there is any way to conserve energy. Ms. Miller indicated she has talked with Ms. Kattreh about exploring solar energy since the roofs are perfect for it. She agreed it is very expensive to run an ice arena, especially during the summer. Member Deeds asked whether it is cost-effective to run all three sheets in the summer. Ms. Miller responded that research shows if 30 hours a week of ice time is sold, it is worth it to run the sheets. She noted staff is working at reducing energy costs. Member Deeds asked about the comparatively low cost of using the Golf Dome as compared with an open facility. Todd Anderson, Braemar Golf Course General Manager, responded it may be cost prohibitive to increase much beyond $8.75 or $9 per bucket. He noted the price is increased on the weekends. Chair Steel asked about residents and non-residents during the winter in the Golf Dome. Mr. Anderson responded probably 70 to 75 percent of users are non-residents. Member Peterson asked about competitors to the Golf Dome. Mr. Anderson cited two competitors in Edina and one in Chanhassen. The new rate increases will capture $140,000 next year. The Golf Dome will be operational on November 1, barring unforeseen complications. Ms. Kattreh added that the Fred Richards Golf Course debt was paid off this year, and that debt was being directly charged to Braemar. VII.D. Urban Forest Task Force Report Ms. Kattreh provided an overview of the task force, which was a project of the Energy and Environment Commission. The City Council has approved the plan and has asked EEC to work with the Park Board and discuss an approach for implementing the plan. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Peterson, to add the Urban Forest Task Force as part of the 2014 Work Plan as amended. Ayes: Members Jones, Steel, Cella, Segreto, Peterson, Deeds. Motion carried. 4 Vlll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIIIA. Council Updates None. VIII.B. Other Correspondence None. IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Jones asked for an update on the Veterans Memorial sculpture. Ms. Kattreh indicated the Veteran's Committee is trying to determine ways to lower the overall cost of the project. Research was done to find a sculptor from the local area who would work, and a sculptor from Wisconsin was found who would do the sculpture for significantly less. Their intention is to continue to gather information from the sculptor in Wisconsin. Member Jones commented the Park Board should be able to weigh in on sculptures permanently displayed in parks. The last sculptor was approved, and she would like to make sure the process for change is something the Park Board is involved with. Ms. Kattreh agreed, and anyone from the Park Board is welcome to serve on the Veteran's Memorial Committee or attend their meetings. She noted the Park Board will see any new designs. Ms. Kattreh indicated the committee has wanted to hire a consultant to do designs and plans for the memorial itself. The City Council voted to give the Veteran's Memorial Committee half of the $38,000 allocated to the memorial. There is a local architect interested in doing the designs for $19,000, which is half of what SEH proposed. This architect needs to provide a scope of services and also sign a contract with the city. The Park Board discussed a possible conflict of interest with the sculptorjoining as a member of the Veteran's Committee. Member Segreto asked about the timeline of this project. Ms. Kattreh stated the original sculpture was accepted a year ago. Member Segreto suggested there is a leadership issue, and she encouraged a hard timeline. Ms. Kattreh indicated the goal is to get the plans and specs drawn up, and they will then solicit in-kind donations. Member Peterson noted the fundraising has been a challenge to the Veteran's Memorial Committee, whose members signed up because they are passionate about creating a veteran's memorial. Chair Steel indicated the Park Board knows people with experience and who can help the Veteran's Memorial Committee. Member Jones asked about the city's relationship with Yorktown Skate Park. Ms. Kattreh indicated the city has a relationship with the YMCA, but the YMCA completely operates the skate park. She would have to look into the specific contractual arrangement. X. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh stated that currently staff is working to prepare a presentation to the City Council on Monday night regarding the sports dome and outdoor rink. Xl. ADJOURNMENT Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to adjourn the meeting at 9:13 p.m. Ayes: Members Deeds, Jones, Steel, Cella, Segreto, Peterson. Motion Carried. The meeting adjourned at 9.13 p.m. To: Park Board From: Ross Bintner P.E. Environmental Engineer Date: November 12, 2013 Subject: Centennial Lakes Promenade Phase 4 Agenda Item #: VI.A. Action ❑X Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Resolution of support for concept plan, provide input on additional design considerations. Information / Background: Phase 4 of the Edina Promenade includes pedestrian, water and public art features from Hazelton Rd. to just north of the Centennial Lakes/Promenade connection. This capital improvement plan (CIP) item (HRA -1 1- 002) coordinates with the new trail connection at 7171 France and completes the Promenade between Hazelton Rd. and York Ave. Two attached reports describe a concept plan for an underground water feature, pedestrian trail, bike trail connections, landscaping, public art and a surficial water feature. Development of the concept followed the guiding vision in the 2007 Edina Promenade Urban Design Plan and policy described in the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. The purpose of the parks and trail feature is to complete an aesthetically pleasing pond and stream feature with intermixed art nodes between Centennial Lakes and Hazelton Rd. and install a permanent pedestrian trail, public lighting, sound and irrigation. The purpose of the underground regional infiltration system is to provide clean surface waters and flood protection and cost effectively generate stormwater credits for future redevelopment. A collaborative approach to inform, engage and develop feedback from city boards and commissions on these plans included two prior meetings with the Park Board, two with the Transportation Commission, and one each with the Energy and Environment, and Arts and Culture commissions. The city also engaged the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board as a project partner through a cooperative agreement, and has coordinated review of design and schedules with the nearby Byerly's development. The project is a unique convergence of a variety of City goals and enhances the following service levels: bike and pedestrian transportation, parks and public spaces, flood protection and clean water, and arts and culture in the public realm. Next Steps: This review by the Park Board is the last step prior to a November 19 consideration by City Council/Edina HRA and November 20 consideration by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board. City of Edina ° 4801 W. 50" St. • Edina, MN 55424 If the City Council/Edina HRA and Nine Mile Creek Board approve the project, the proposed schedule would have the project designed from December to March, bid in April, and constructed from June - October 2014. This schedule could be adjusted to coordinate work with the Byerly's / 7171 France apartment buildings project if cost savings or site access issues present themselves during the design. Summarized below are the concept level estimate and funding sources for this project; not included in the estimate are values of easements at 7171 France, as spelled out in the development agreement, which total $183,625. This value is paid as a credit to parks dedication fees of $5,000/unit, which are expected to generate $1,170,000 from the expected 234 units. Project Element: Concept Funding Sources Estimate Parks water feature, public lighting, $1,040,000 $600,000 from 7171 France park dedication fees public art nodes and pedestrian Remainder from HRA/Centennial Lakes TIF trail and Y2 share of pump station, district (CIP item NRA -1 1-002) Design, engineering, plans, specs, $140,000 and construction admin. support, Underground regional infiltration $591,350 Equal shares from Nine Mile Creek Watershed feature and shallow gardens with District and City of Edina stormwater utility rock channel and %2 share of pump station. Design, engineering, plans, specs, $85,000 and construction admin support. Project management and Engineering HRA/Centennial Lakes TIF district (CIP item HRA - construction oversight staff time I I-002) and City of Edina stormwater utility TOTAL $1,856,350 Attachments: URS Promenade Phase 4 Conceptual Plan Outline and Narrative Barr Engineering Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan GAPMCENTRAI SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\IMPR NOS\STS401 Promenade Phase 4\ADMIN\131112 Promenade Phase 4 Park Board.docx EDINA ^I� PROMENADE �fy-- T J 71 1Y' 1 i� � I .mac A Edina Promenade Phase 4 Conceptual Plan Outline and Narrative October 18, 2013 Introduction This project represents the completion of the Promenade Master Plan that was adopted in 2007. The proposed project incorporates a water feature into the central segment of the Promenade as envisioned in the 2007 Masterplan. The background information for the Promenade in general and the water feature can be found in the "Edina Promenade, Urban Design Plan", which was prepared by URS in 2007. 33 s��"!Sf+Opa1 Ce„rrtar '. ,.,I., �„�: -- 59—aa6 LY `� I Prwnenade a r �a �� 9_ 3 _•• �.c����� e Plan x . iEth SI - •: _ - Promenade Design — I z crc 7 X 4. Gateway 2. FSft— Cmswads v"Ir. FeaMe 46 s pa i ; ScvlpNre � - FarHain T. Pond/Stream and Fountain �.•� L Yak Ave. Underpm 0 100 000 Feel T EDINA d PROMENADE c ur"n Design Plan r� Jub 2001 GOCore Component -Water EDINA `" PROMENADE � The project intends to complete the Promenade segment 9 between Centennial Lakes and 70th Street by creating the E ' ' missing central water feature south of Hazelton. The overall concept for Centennial Lakes was to create a 'necklace' of special j features or spaces that ring the lakes. For the Promenade, which -' is a very linear and narrow corridor and which was programmed to include a walking path and a bike trail that is part of the Three -' Rivers Regional Trail, the concept was to create a series of small plazas or spaces that would incorporate public art as the main features and attractions. The plan also called for a major central water feature that would add extra interest in the middle of the �? ~ Promenade corridor and that would provide a thematic link or -_ connection to Centennial Lakes. The water feature is a key { element for the Promenade, since water, especially fountains and a flowing stream, will add motion and liveliness to the Promenade environment. 1; -'� The redevelopment of the Byerly's parcel is the catalyst that allows us to incorporate this water feature into the Promenade. 1 / UM EDINADesign PROMENADE + Approach ►,. The key constraint was the narrowness of the Promenade corridor. This was overcome by weaving the two paths in such a r fashion as to create viable small plazas for public art between the paths. The opportunity area is the central segment of the ,+ corridor where the space to create a larger water feature results from the adjacent redevelopment and associated easement. This segment of the Promenade naturally slopes down to the v .l } south which provides the opportunity to create a flowing -YS stream. The original concept envisioned a sizable water feature with a number of water -related attractions. Development plans for the area have resulted in less area than anticipated being available for the special water feature. However, it is still large enough to provide room for the essential design elements, such as a small pond, the flowing stream, and a few special water - related features. t Y UM EDINA PROMENADE PHASE 4 Phase 4 Project Elements: • Will be integrated with a Water Quality Infiltration Project • Will include an easement for the trail and water feature • Replaces the temporary pedestrian path with a permanent colored concrete trail • Provides swinging benches and other seating at key locations for enjoyment of features • Incorporates three water features including a plaza at the north end where the water will enter the corridor, a central pond which will be the focal point and provide water treatment, and a basin at the south end where the water will enter back into the circulation system • Provides opportunities for many additional trees, shrubs and perennial plantings Connects the park features with a "Babbling Brook" channel which will meanderfrom north to south creating interesting nodes and user experiences PROPOSED MASTER PLAN OVERVIEW Lij PROPOSED MASTER PLAN: NORTH 1 O' COLORED CONCRETE WALK HARD EDGE AT WATER - ===WINGING BENCH (TYP.)- PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE- REOLCATE FIBER OPTIC 'WATER WALL - FEATURE START OF BROOK - (FORMAL CHANNEL) TREES TO SCREEN ADJACENT PROPERTY Ty CONNECT TO 8' DEVELOPMENT -,=Zfl FIE 869.6 RETAINING WALL - 4' CONCRETE WALK HC PLAZA ACCESS SWINGING BENCH SCULPTURE OPPORTUNITY PLAZA STEP /SEATWALL 5 L BROOK CROSSING FEATURE ( BABJLIIG BROOK CASCADE- . BROOK CROSSING FEATURE =OVERLOOK/SCULPTURE OPPORTUNITY ISLAND FEATURE TO PROVIDE MANHOLEACCESS BROOK CROSSING FEATURE �r LOWER CHANNEL (LESS FORMAL CHARACTER) BROOK AT 1.5% BROOK CROSSING FEATURE PROPOSED_ MASTER PLAN: SOUTH CONNECTION TOS CONDOMINIUMS AAD FUTURE TRAIL BENCH` ff�;9 EDINA PROMENADEI ! -y Y s . BROOK CONCEPT THE BROOK CHANNEL IS ENVISIONED TO BE FAIRLY NARROW: 2' AT THE BOTTOM WITH EDGES BEING 1-3' DEPENDING ON THE CONDITIONS. THE UPPER CHANNEL WILL BE MORE FORMAL WITH STONE OR FORMED CONCRETE EDGES (EXAMPLE PHOTO 1). THE CHANNEL BELOW THE POND WILL BE LESS FORMAL, WITH SCATTERED BOULDERS MEANDERING ALONG THE CHANNEL (EXAMPLE PHOTO 2). THE WATERWAY WILL BE LINED IN SOME WAY, MOST LIKELY WITH PLAIN OR COLORED CONCRETE. UAMPIEPHOLOi: FORMAL HARDEDGFvdSMDOTLICHMNH.BOTTOM EXAALPLEPHOLOZGRAVELCHANKUWM ROCKS AS GRACE DROPS FORMING SMALL POOLS, INFORMAL ROCK EDGE EDINA PROMENADE - o. } 1 a'. pp I 7 � Y SCULPTURAL NODE CONCEPT THERE WILL BE THREE OR FOUR LOCATIONS FOR SCULPTURAL INSTALLATIONS. THE BEGINNING AND END OF THE "BABBLING BROOK" CHANNEL ARE IMPORTANT NODES IN THIS PORTION OF THE PROMENADE. THESE NODES WILL BE PERMANENTLY INTEGRATED INTO THE WATER FEATURES AND BE PART OF THE WATER CIRCULATION SYSTEM. OTHER LOCATIONS MAY BE USED FOR TEMPORARY INSTALLATIONS. SMALL DROPS SPACED ALONG LENGTH OF BROOK SIMPLE ELEGANT SCULPTURE IN SMALL FORMALPOOL CASCADING WATER CONCEPT THE TOTAL GRADE CHANGE FROM THE TOP OF THE WATERWAY TO THE LOWER OUTLET AREA IS ABOUT 10'. MOST OF THE CHANNEL WILL BE FAIRLY FLAT. TRANSITION AREAS FLOWING TO AND FROM THE POND WILL BE MAXIMIZED TO PROVIDE SOME INTERESTING CASCADING FEATURES. l�J EDINA PROMENADE i POND CONCEPT THE POND WILL BE LINED WITH COLORED CONCRETE TO FACILITATE PERIODIC MAINTENANCE / FLUSHING. THE WEST EDGE WILL BE A SHORT WALL, 2.S' MAXIMUM AND WILL NOT REQUIRE A RAILING. THE EAST EDGE WILL BE LINED WITH LARGE BOULDERS TO DISCOURAGE PEOPLE FROM GOING INTO THE WATER. THE WATER WILL BE CIRCULATING AT ALLTIMES AND WILL BE PUMPED FROM THE NORTH POND OF CENTENNIAL LAKES. IT'S FUNCTION WILL BE TO PROVIDE A PASSIVE RECREATIONAL ENVIRONMENT FOR TRAIL USERS WHILE INCREASING THE RUN-OFF TREATMENT CAPACITY FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES STORM WATER SYSTEM AND PROPOSED BYERLY'S SITE DEVELOPMENT. BROOK CROSSING FEATURE CONCEPTS TRAIL CROSSINGS WILL BE SIMPLE - STRUCTURES WHICH WILL PERMIT WATER TO FLOW UNDERNEATH WITHOUT BEING HIGH ENOUGH TO REQUIRE RAILINGS. IN SOME OR ALL CASES A "BUMPER" MAY BE ADDED AS AN ADDED SAFETY MEASURE FOR WHEELCHAIRS, STROLLERS, ETC. MIX CONCRETE WALK/EDGE WITH RIP -RAP EDGE Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan Prepared for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina October 18, 2013 Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan Prepared for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina October 18, 2013 4700 West 77" Street Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: (952) 832-2600 BARR Fax: (952) 832-2601 Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan October 18,2013 Table of Contents l.O}r�uuBackground and U�e��eu----------------------------------. I 1.1 Background ...................................................................... ........................................................... / 12 Project Objectives ....................................................................................................................... / 2.0Infiltration Design Concepts .................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Design Considerations ................................................................................................................ 3 2.1.1 Lu��uuOm/ugo-----------------------------------. 3 2.12 Centennial Lakes Water Level Fluctuations ................................................ ................. 3 2.1.3 Conflicts with Existing Infrastructure ............................................................................ ] 2.1.4 Coordination ofDesign with Proposed Promenade Water Feature ............................... 4 2.2 Design Concepts ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Design Option A:Deep Underground lufikrudouSystem ............................................ 4 2.2.2 Design Option 8:Shallow Underground System ........................ 4 2.2.3 Design Option C: Shallow Garden Basins ..................................................................... 5 2.2.4 Design Option IlShallow Gardens with Rock Channel ............................................... 5 2.3 {)mt Estimates ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 Summary ofProject Benefits ............................................................................................................... l3 3.1 Volume Reduction .................................................................................................................... l3 3.2 Phosphorus Removal -----.------------------------------...l3 3.2 Comparison ofCost/Benefit .-------------_------.------------.l4 3.4 Other Benefits and Risks -----------.------------...—.----....l5 List of Tables Table 1 Concept Level Engineer's Opinion of Cost........................................................................ 11 Table 2 Volume reduction and phosphorus removal for a range of infiltration areas ....................... 14 Table 3 Cost comparison of conceptual design options................................................................... 14 Table 4 Comparison of benefits, costs, and risks of conceptual design options ............................... 15 List of Figures Figure 1 Edina Promenade Location Map.......................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Deep Underground Infiltration Concept............................................................................... 6 Figure 3 Shallow Underground Irrigation/Infiltration Concept........................................................... 7 Figure 4 Shallow Garden Basins Concept.......................................................................................... 8 Figure 5 Deep Underground Infiltration + Shallow Gardens with Rock Channel Concept .................. 9 Figure 6 Underground Irrigation and Infiltration + Shallow Gardens with Rock Channel Concept ... 10 List of Appendices Appendix A URS Preliminary Concept Design Appendix B Preliminary Plan Sheet Drawings P:\Mpls\23 MN\27123271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\FINAL\Promenade_VolReduction_DraRReport_final.docx ii 1.0 Project Background and Objectives 1.1 Background The Edina Promenade, located in the greater Southdale area near Centennial Lakes, is an 80 -foot wide greenway that connects Centennial Lakes Park to the nearby retail and residential areas (see Figure 1). The corridor, owned by the City of Edina, currently provides walking and bike paths, and plans are underway for installation of a pond and babbling brook feature that would serve as an amenity and backdrop for several art sculptures. The proposed water feature along the Promenade will use water pumped from Centennial Lakes. Current land use in the area around the Promenade is generally commercial and high-density residential, with much of the land cover being impervious surface. Runoff from much of the surrounding area is conveyed to Centennial Lakes through storm sewer pipes; minimal stormwater treatment is provided prior to discharge to the lake. 1.2 Project Objectives The soils in the Centennial Lakes watershed are generally sandy and conducive to infiltration. The City's goal is to utilize the sandy soils along portions of the Promenade for stormwater infiltration, while maintaining current and proposed functions of the greenway (walking, biking, aesthetic viewing). To do so, the City and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District asked Barr to develop a volume -reduction plan for the portion of the Promenade between Hazelton Avenue and Centennial Lakes, including several conceptual stormwater infiltration options. The infiltration concepts are described in further detail below. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\F1NAL\Promenade_VolReduction_DraftReport_final.docx 1 0 0 375 750 Figure 1 Legend Edina Promenade Volume Reduction Study Area Feet Centennial Lakes Watershed 1 inch : 750 feet EDINA PROMENADE LOCATION MAP Centennial Lakes Volume Reduction Plan Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Edina, MN 2.0 Infiltration Design Concepts 2.1 Design Considerations Four conceptual infiltration system designs were developed for the Promenade to maximize the volume reduction potential within the design constraints summarized in the following sections. 2.1.1 Lake as Storage Typical stormwater infiltration best management practices (BMPs) are designed to capture a specified amount of rainfall runoff (such as one inch of runoff from impervious surfaces), then infiltrate the runoff into the ground. This type of design requires a fairly significant land footprint, especially on sites with a large amount of impervious area draining to the infiltration practice. With the existing walking and bike paths and the proposed pond and babbling brook feature, the remaining available land along the Promenade for surface infiltration BMPs is limited. Given the limited land available for storage of runoff prior.to infiltration and the plans to install a pump from Centennial Lakes to feed the proposed water feature, it was decided that water from Centennial Lakes will be pumped into the Promenade stormwater infiltration system. This approach of using Centennial Lakes for runoff storage decreases the surface and/or underground storage costs and increases the amount of runoff volume that can be infiltrated. 2.1.2 Centennial Lakes Water Level Fluctuations As mentioned above, the primary objective of this project is to infiltrate stormwater runoff stored in Centennial Lakes. However, caution must be taken so that water level fluctuations in Centennial Lakes remain acceptable to stakeholders (nearby residents, businesses, and park users). In an effort to avoid significant water level fluctuations, the concepts were designed and evaluated under the assumption that levels in Centennial Lakes would be allowed to drop a maximum of 0.5 feet below the normal control elevation of 838 MSL, with the volume of water being used for infiltration. 2.1.3 Conflicts with Existing Infrastructure The location of existing infrastructure within the Promenade study area was a significant consideration when developing the infiltration system conceptual designs. Each of the conceptual infiltration designs avoid disturbance of the recently constructed bike trail. There are several existing utilities located below the Promenade study area, including storm sewer, sanitary sewer, fiber optic, and watermain. The conceptual infiltration systems were designed under the assumptions that the watermain and fiber optic lines could be relocated as needed, but the storm sewer and sanitary sewer would not be disturbed. For the proposed infiltration areas above the existing sanitary sewer, it was assumed that the sanitary system would be slip -lined as part of the project to minimize inflow and infiltration into the sanitary system. P:VApls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\FINAL\Promenade_VolReduction_DraftReport_final.docx 3 2.1.4 Coordination of Design with Proposed Promenade Water Feature The City of Edina has been working with the consulting firm URS, Inc. to design a water feature throughout a portion of the Promenade, including a pond and babbling brook -type feature that recirculates water pumped from Centennial Lakes. A rendering developed by URS, Inc depicting the most recent water feature conceptual plan is included in Appendix A. The conceptual infiltration system designs were developed to work around or in conjunction with the proposed URS, Inc. water feature layout. 2.2 Design Concepts The following conceptual infiltration system designs were developed for consideration based on the design constraints described above and multiple discussions with NMCWD and City staff: - 1. Option A: Deep Underground Infiltration System 2. Option B: Shallow Underground Infiltration/Irrigation System 3. Option C: Shallow Surface Garden Basins 4. Option D: Shallow Surface Gardens with Rock Channel, in combination with underground system Option A or B Each of these four conceptual designs, and combinations thereof, are described in further detail below and shown in Figures 2 through 6. Preliminary plan sheet drawings of each concept are also included in Appendix B. Infiltration footprints have been estimated for each of the concepts to help quantify the potential benefits of each option. The estimated infiltration footprint areas, shown on the plan sheet drawings in Appendix B, are currently based on a concept level of design and likely to vary upon final design. 2.2.1 Design Option A: Deep Underground Infiltration System The deep underground infiltration system, shown in Figure 2, consists of installation of perforated pipes within an underground infiltration bed. Water pumped from Centennial Lakes would flow into the underground infiltration system and spread out via the rows of perforated pipes. The underground infiltration bed would optimize the available infiltration footprint within the Promenade area, covering 0.63 acres, and would be installed approximately six to nine feet below the proposed pathway and water feature. 2.2.2 Design Option B: Shallow Underground Irrigation/Infiltration System The shallow underground infiltration system, also shown in Figure 3, consists of installation of shallow infiltration beds below and alongside the proposed pathway. Water pumped from Centennial Lakes would travel through a main draintile beneath the proposed pathway and outward into smaller draintile pipes that would distribute the water into shallow rock trenches. Water in these trenches would be wicked up through roots and used to irrigate lawn and plantings, as well as infiltrate into the ground. The shallow underground irrigation/infiltration system would optimize the available P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\FINAL\Promenade_VolReductior _DraftReport_ftnal.docx 4 footprint within the Promenade area, covering 0.62 acres, without interfering with the proposed pathway and water feature. 2.2.3 Design Option C: Shallow Garden Basins This conceptual design would consist of a series of shallow (less than six inches deep) garden infiltration basins that would be located amid the proposed pathway and water feature (see Figure 4). The basins would be planted to enhance the landscape and maintain consistency with the planning themes of the Promenade and Centennial Lakes Park. Because these gardens would be located amidst the proposed pathway and water feature, the infiltration surface area would be less than the underground infiltration options (0.33 acres). 2.2.4 Design Option D: Shallow Gardens with Rock Channel This conceptual design, which is limited to the lower portion of the Promenade study area, would consist of a series of shallow (less than six inches deep) garden infiltration basins connected by a rock channel resembling a stone creekbed. Water pumped from Centennial Lakes would flow through the channel and series of gardens, infiltrating into the ground and providing water for garden plants. This option, which would be installed in the portion of the Promenade south of the proposed water feature, is intended to be installed in conjunction with one of the underground options installed below the proposed water feature. Option D in combination with the deep underground infiltration system (Option A) is shown in Figure 5. Option D in combination with the shallow underground irrigation/infiltration system (Option B) is shown in Figure 6. The estimated infiltration footprint of options D/A and D/B are 0.56 acres and 0.52 acres, respectively. 2.3 Cost Estimates Planning level engineer's opinions of probable construction cost were prepared for the proposed pumping system and each design option. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 1, are based on.our experience and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on concept -level designs, a contingency of 20% was applied to the estimated construction costs. MlApls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Us Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\FINAL\Promenade_VolReduction_DraftReport_final.docx OPTION FIGURE DEEP UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION Water pumped up from the lake flows into an underground infiltration bed and spreads out via rows of perforated pipes. The infiltration bed lays 6-9' below rhe proposed pathwi)r and Water feature, and occupies over it half acre footprint. FIGURE 3: gels sed intile into e the lrh so As and Water into the OPTION C Q ti if FIGURE 4: SHALLOW GARDEN BASINS \1V atel• pumped up from the lake irrigates a series of about 20 shallow (< 6" deep) garden infiltration basins. Basins mill be planted to enhance the landscape and maintain consistence with the planting themes of the Promenade and Centennial Lakes Park. To reduce cost, it may be possible to haVC turf grass in some portion of the basins. FIGURE 5: DEEP UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SHALLOW GARDENS WITH ROCK CHANNEL OPTION DSA Deep Underground Infiltration System Babbling brook feature continues through shallow bioinfiltration garden: c 0 J: GARDENS WITH ROCK CHANNEL FIGURE 6: UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION AND INFILTRATION SHALLOW GARDENS WITH ROCK CHANNEL OPTION D/B: Shallow Underground � Irrigations Infiltration systclnil Z�- I d I . ........ i Babbling brook feature continues thi-ou 9h shallow 10 bioinfiltration gardens bHALLUVV UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION AND GARDENS WITH ROCK CHANNEL TABLE 1. CONCEPT LEVEL ENGINEER'S OPINION OF COST CENTENNIAL LAKES VOLUME REDUCTION OPTIONS 10/7/2013 Pumping System & Sanitary 1/1 Prevention Costs (costs apply to each option presented below) Item Description Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Price Extension PUMPING STATION LS 1 $ 25,000 $ 25 000.00 6" HDPE PUMP STATION LF 3000 20 $ 60,000.00 SLIP LINE 8" VCP SEWER WITHIN INFILT FOOTPRINT LF 360 40 $ 14400.00 APPURTENANCES 32,640.00 20% 20 000.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION $ 5% $ 6,000.00 13 400.00 SUBTOTAL CY $ 125400.00 CONTINGENCY 35 20% $ 25 000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL CY $ 150,400.00 ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATION30% 50 $ $ 45,000.00 SOD TOTAL 4000 $ 195,400.00 OPTION A: Deep Underground Infiltration' Opinion of probable cost does not include potential costs for relocating watermain on north portion of Promenade study area. OPTION B: Shallow Underground Infiltration/Irrigation Item Description Item Description Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Price Extension Extension COMMON EXCAVATION CY 2720 $ 12 $ 32,640.00 TOPSOIL CY 670 $ 20 $ 13 400.00 CLEAR ROCK CY 1800 $ 35 1100 63 000.00 GRANULAR SEPARATION LAYER CY 250 $ 50 $ 12,500.00 SOD SY 4000 $ 4.0 $ 16 000.00 12" DRAINTILE LF 2300 $ 30 $ 69 000.00 APPURTENANCES 1300 $ 7 20% 9,100.00 WEIR STRUCTURES 41000.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 1,500 $ 51/6 SOIL LOOSENING $ 12 000.00 $ 2 SUBTOTAL APPURTENANCES $ 259 540.00 CONTINGENCY 43,000.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 20% 5% 52 000.00 13 000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL $ 311,540.00 ENGINEERING &ADMINISTRATION CONTINGENCY 30% 20% $ 93,000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL TOTAL $ 324,340.00 ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATION $404,540.00 Opinion of probable cost does not include potential costs for relocating watermain on north portion of Promenade study area. OPTION B: Shallow Underground Infiltration/Irrigation P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Alternatives Cost Estimate\Cost Estimate - Revised Cost Estimate - Revised Item Description Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Price Extension COMMON EXCAVATION- EXPORT CY 4270 $ 12 $ 51,240.00 TOPSOIL - 18" AVERAGE CY 2000 20 $ 40 000.00 CLEAR ROCK CY 1000 $ 25 25 000.00 CLEAN WASHED SAND CY 1100 $ 25 27 500.00 GRANULAR SEPARATION LAYER CY 170 $ 50 $ 8,500.00 SOD SY 4000 $ 4.0 16,000.00 12" DRAINTILE LF 900 $ 15 13 500.00 4" DRAINTILE LF 1300 $ 7 $ 9,100.00 WEIR STRUCTURES EA 13 1,500 $ 19500.00 SOIL LOOSENING SY 2000 $ 2 4,000.00 APPURTENANCES 20% $ 43,000.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 5% $ 13 000.00 SUBTOTAL $ 270 340.00 CONTINGENCY 20% $ 54 000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 324,340.00 ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATION 30% $ 97,000.00 TOTAL $421,340.00 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Alternatives Cost Estimate\Cost Estimate - Revised Cost Estimate - Revised nPTinm n/a• noon t indprnrmend Infiltration WITH Shallow Gardens w/Rock Channel' Item Description Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Price Extension GARDENS COMPLETE SF 14700 $ 10 147 000.00 IRRIGATION SYSTEM LS 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000.00 APPURTENANCES 24 600.00 20% $ 31000.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION $ 20 5% 9,000.00 CLEAR ROCK SUBTOTAL 1350 $ 197 000.00 CONTINGENCY 47 250.00 20% $ 39000.00 200 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ $ 236,000.00 ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATION SY 30% $ 71,000.00 $ TOTAL 12" DRAINTILE $307,000.00 nPTinm n/a• noon t indprnrmend Infiltration WITH Shallow Gardens w/Rock Channel' ' Opinion of probable cost does not include potential costs for relocating watermain on north portion of Promenade study area. nDTIlNJ rVem Chalin,ar n..aornrnmd Intiitratinnilrrinatinn WITH Shallow Gardens w/Rock Channel Item Description Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Price Extension COMMON EXCAVATION CY 2050 $ 12 $ 24 600.00 TOPSOIL CY 500 $ 20 $ 10,000.00 CLEAR ROCK CY 1350 $ 35 $ 47 250.00 GRANULAR SEPARATION LAYER CY 200 $ 50 $ 10,000.00 SOD SY 3000 $ 4.0 $ 12 000.00 12" DRAINTILE LF 1700 $ 30 $ 51,000-00 ROCK INFILTRATION TRENCH W/ STREAM LF 210 $ 50 $ 10,500.00 OVERFLOW STRUCTURE EA 5 $ 1,000 $ 5,000.00 GARDENS COMPLETE SF 3200 10 $ 32 000.00 SIDEWALK CROSSINGS EA 2 1,500 $ 3 000.00 APPURTENANCES EA 5 20°k 41000.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION SF 3200 5% $ 12,000-00 SIDEWALK CROSSINGS EA SUBTOTAL $ 1,500 $ 258 350.00 CONTINGENCY 20% $ 52,000.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 310,350.00 ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATION 30% $ 93,000.00 253 950.00 CONTINGENCY(20%)........_51,000.00 TOTAL $403,350.00 ' Opinion of probable cost does not include potential costs for relocating watermain on north portion of Promenade study area. nDTIlNJ rVem Chalin,ar n..aornrnmd Intiitratinnilrrinatinn WITH Shallow Gardens w/Rock Channel P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Alternatives Cost Estimate\Cost Estimate - RevisedCost Estimate - Revised Item Description Unit Estimated Quantity Unit Price Extension COMMON EXCAVATION- EXPORT CY 3000 $ 12 36 000.00 TOPSOIL - 18" AVERAGE CY 1400 20 $ 28,000.00 CLEAR ROCK CY 700 $ 25 $ 17 500.00 CLEAN WASHED SAND CY 780 $ 25 19,500-00 GRANULAR SEPARATION LAYER CY 120 $ 50 6,000-00 SOD SY 3000 $ 4,0 $ 12 000.00 12" DRAINTILE LF 620 $ 15 $ 9,300.00 4" DRAINTILE LF 950 $ 7 $ 6,650.00 WEIR STRUCTURE EA 11 1.500 $ 16,500.00 ROCK INFILTRATION TRENCH W/ STREAM LF 210 $ 50 $ 10,500-00 OVERFLOW STRUCTURE EA 5 $ 1,000 5 000.00 GARDENS COMPLETE SF 3200 $ 10 $ 32,000.00 SIDEWALK CROSSINGS EA 2 $ 1,500 $ 3,000.00 APPURTENANCES 20% $ 40,000.00 MOBILIZATION/DEMOBILIZATION 5°/ $ 12,000,00 SUBTOTAL $ 253 950.00 CONTINGENCY(20%)........_51,000.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $ 304,950.00 ENGINEERING & ADMINISTRATION 309/6 $ 91,000.00 TOTAL $395,950.00 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Alternatives Cost Estimate\Cost Estimate - RevisedCost Estimate - Revised 3.0 Summary of Project Benefits 3.1 Volume Reduction While typical infiltration basins capture and infiltrate site runoff only following a precipitation event, the proposed systems function on a continuous basis (with the exception of times when water levels in the lake drop 0.5 feet below the control elevation). Given these differences, it was important to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed infiltration systems on a long-term basis. To do so, the City's XP-SWMM model for the Centennial Lakes watershed was modified to incorporate a range of pumping scenarios that reflect a range of infiltration area "footprints" and run for a 35 -year time period using 15 -minute precipitation data from Golden Valley, Minnesota (Barr, 2011). Model results from the 35 -year time period were used to estimate the average annual volume reduction achieved through a Promenade infiltration system. Table 2 summarizes the modeled infiltration area "footprints" and corresponding pumping rates. The pumping rates were computed using a saturated hydraulic conductivity of 1.6 inches/hour, based on an assumption that soils within the Promenade are generally sandy. The average annual volume reduction achieved for each infiltration footprint was computed by quantifying the average volume pumped from the lake annually during the typical nonfrozen-ground period of April 7th through December 6 (Barr, 2011). Based on the 35 years of modeling results, the estimated average annual infiltration from a system ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 acres in size is between 73 acre-feet and 175 acre-feet. The corresponding average annual percent reduction in discharge volume from Centennial Lakes ranges from 17 to 41 percent, depending on the infiltration footprint. The percent annual volume reduction calculation includes flow that is periodically pumped to Centennial Lakes from Adam's Hill Pond in Richfield. 3.2 Phosphorus Removal Phosphorus is recognized as a primary pollutant of concern for urban water bodies within Minnesota, and the City of Edina has several goals and policies to promote removal of phosphorus from its stormwater. The estimated phosphorus removals from implementation of a proposed Promenade infiltration system were estimated for a range of infiltration footprints, based on the estimated average annual volume reductions. In the absence of water quality monitoring data from Centennial Lakes, corresponding phosphorus reductions were estimated assuming an average in -lake phosphorus concentration of 150 gg/L. Table 2 summarizes the estimated phosphorus removals achieved for a range of infiltration footprints and corresponding pumping rates. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\FINAL\Promenade—VolReduction—DraftReport_final.docx 13 Table 2 Volume reduction and phosphorus removal for a range of infiltration areas Infiltration Corresponding Average Annual % Average Annual Estimated Average Annual Phosphorus 1 Footprint Pumping Rate Volume Reduction Volume Reduction Removal' (acre) (efs) (acre-feet) Capacity Cost (lbs) 0.1 0.16 73 1 17 30 0.2 0.32 115 27 47 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.66 ( 0.81 0.5 139 33 57 153 36 I 62 164 38 67 0.6 I 0.97 L 175 41 71 ' Values are rounded to nearest whole number 3.3 Comparison of Cost/Benefit Table 3 summarizes the estimated design and construction costs for the evaluated design options. These upfront capital costs were divided by the estimated average annual volume reduction and phosphorus removal to compute a volume reduction or treatment capacity cost for each option for comparative purposes. The volume reduction capacity and treatment capacity costs, which are summarized in Table 3, do not include life -cycle efficiency or incorporate operation and maintenance costs. Table 3 Cost comparison of conceptual design options Infiltration Estimated Design Volume Reduction Phosphorus Removal Capacity Design Footprint and Construction Capacity Cost Cost t Cost Option p (acres) Cost' ($/acre-foot) ($ A 0.63 $600,000 3,370 8,291 0.62 $617,000 8,575 B 3,486 C 0.33 $502,000 3,503 8,618 D/A 0.56 $599,000 3,512 8,639 D/B 0.52 $591,000 3,558 8,752 Dollars rounded to nearest thousand P:\Mpls\23 bIN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\work Files\Report\FINAL\Promenade_VolReduction_Dr.tftReport_final.docz 14 3.4 Other Benefits and Risks The four conceptual design options were compared in terms of costs, benefits, and risks to help understand the advantages and disadvantages of each option. Table 4 ranks several project costs, benefits, and risks as high, medium, or low based on discussion with City of Edina and NMCWD staff. Table 4 Comparison of benefits, costs, and risks of conceptual design options Option A Option B j Option C Option D Option D (stand-alone) (combined with Option A or B) P:Npls\23 MN\27\7.3271309 Edina Centennial Us Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\FINAL\Promenade_VolReduction_DraftReport_final.docx 15 BENEFITS Volume reduction High High Medium Low High Education Medium Medium High High High Evapotranspiration Very Low Medium High High Medium COSTS Construction Cost Medium Medium Medium Low Medium Incremental Volume Low Low Low Low Low Reduction and Phosphorus Removal Costs Short-term Low Low/Medium Medium/High Medium/High Medium Maintenance Cost Long-term Very High High Medium Medium Medium/High Maintenance Cost RISKS Public Acceptance High High Low Medium/High High P:Npls\23 MN\27\7.3271309 Edina Centennial Us Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\FINAL\Promenade_VolReduction_DraftReport_final.docx 15 References Barr Engineering Co., Assessment of MIDS Performance Goal Alternatives: Runoff Volumes, Runoff Rates, and Pollutant Removal Efficiencies. Prepared for Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. June 2011. PAMpls\23 MN\27\23271309 Edina Centennial Lks Vol Red\WorkFiles\Report\FINAL\Promenade_VolReduction_DraftReport_final.docx 16 Appendix A URS Preliminary Concept Design 1 ( I I , HC CCESS FIBEROREOLCATE INGINGPLAZA BENCH FIRER OPTIC SWINGWGBENCH Y ATER WALL' FEATURE SCULPTURE OPPORTUNfTY START OF BROOK PLAZA (FOR).0 CHANNEL) STEP i SEATWALL TREES TO SCREEN ADJACENT PROPER TY n BROOK CROSSING FEATURE CONNECT TOW DE OPMENTBABELI GBROOKCASCADE — LK •' f pp BROOK GROSSING FGNR[ .-..-D FfE IfASS —OVERLOOWSGULPTURE OPPORTUNITY EMERGENCY EXNWALKWAY 1 'I PDPIDAEV 042 TV COLORED CONCRETE WALK SWIHOLE$ TO BE +yy CAPPED BELOW GRADE HARD EDGE AT WATER EHCM ��ssyc� ry51NNGIfJG BENCH FTP) I f _ r ��� BROOK CROSSING FEATURE ,r PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE 1 LOWER CHANNEL (LESS FORMAL RETAINING WALL CHARACTER) A'CONCRETE WALK BYERLY'S FRANCE AVE REDEVELOPMENT HOUSING BUILDING'A' , BABBLING BROOK AT 15% FALL - - - BROOK CRGSStNG FEATURE BROOK CROSSING FEATURE . ___i CONNECTION TO DOMINIUMS FUTURE TRAIL LOOP 7 CONDOMINIUMS AND FUTURE , TRAIL FUTURE WATER FEATURE' BENCHES / SCULPTURAL WATER BASIN (END OF BABBLING BROOK) SINGING BENCH PROPOSED 7RAIL LIGHT (TYP.) V J{ lJ BEM.1 v O O 0 30 60 O L_� CONNECT NEW TRAIL TO CIRCLE SCALE CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY CONCEPT DESIGN JULY 26, 2013 PROMENADE IMPROVEMENTS vias Preliminary Plan Sheet Drawings X11 PLW: DEEP VNOERGROUW INFKTRATON X p 0"© o M1=41. PSECODN: R.T DEEP UNDERGROUND INERATION mal, � CONSDTUDTON UWM DEEP UNDERGROUND INWRATION AREA a 0.63 ACRES awe®®®saw _ IN - I'r70CITY OF EDINA M�K WNn0000©o o� PA4 _--- PRfNARY ORAf'T CONSTRUCTION UMTS WEIR STRUCTURE WTH DRAINTILE EXTENDING ALONG PROPOSED CONTOURS NEILTRATION FOOTPRINT �.. N•.m. tub?wwT AREA 0.62 ACRES r1SP1AAk SFMLLDW UN ERDRD ND INFlLTRATIDN/RRIGAl10N`O ` Amo 6 �---- uK � �: oann.a :spm mus v�o cv.A roc. [j] SECTION: 72• DRAINnLE UNDER WALK SECTON� �A• DRAINiRF ALONG CONTOURS RRELIAIINIRY RRIfT P���•a��R� _ ' m®®®mea _ ,I .. 7CEVrEA.XFL--F',FES ©0 • 11 I PRL'LIXIMRY" DRAFT I.M. eec=oee _ r n CONS UCTIDN UMRS DEEP UNDERGROUND INi1 M110N ..:. AREA = 0.49 ACRES I WFILTRATION FOOTPRINT \ `" � urulr ween AREA = 0.09 ACRE ^PLAN: DEEP UNDERGROUND INEILTRATIO W"W1111110W xr[rrtn Q GARDENS W/ROCK C1119 f •ilii 1 Q n n(D *' tt51uN TAu uwmt �Y Wun[ � � [[r •ampK� [wnnx[ wvnox S~' GARDENS W/ ROCK CHAl81EL [nAx ery .r.mx. Cl S409: DEEP UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION �.�SNALLOW PRCL/N/N•IRY ORVT CENTENNIAL LAKES , Milo '^°'*••""'"""°" — BARB CITY OF EDINA VOLUME REDUCTION ee stu o6cxlPnpx _ �io/ion _ •� MINA, MN MON D/A DEEP UNDERGROUND WI SHALLOW GARDENS CA CONSTRUCTION LIMBS WEIR STRUCTURE MN DRNNRLE ` ~ DnNDING ALONG PROPOSED COMOURS • WFILTRATgN FOOTPRINT i' ��. AREA < C.. ACRES `• vmm umM .. INSLTRATION FOOTPRINT - _ - _ _ _ •. --` ._` _ � AREA - O.OB ACRES _'+',J ='\� �' \\� •fma Tau T UERGROUINRLTRAMMARRMAMN WITFISMLCN' fJRD W N -• -- _ _ - ••-�_��I raMmc.uw [15ECR0�12' ORAINIILE UNDER WA1K � r eT• sn•a•Iwx u�u aw cmc /31 SECR . 4' DRAIMILE ALONG CONTOURS Diss'" PRCVY/NARY 191W7 To: Park Board From: Susan Faus Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Date: November 12, 2013 Subject: Yorktown Park Community Garden Status Agenda Item #: VI.B. Action 21 Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Approve the Yorktown Park Community Garden as a permanent park amenity Information I Background: A brief review of the history of the development of the community garden project: • March 2012 — City Council members expressed a desire to revisit the community garden question using public land. • July 2012 — City Council encouraged the Community Health Committee to add community gardens to their work. plan. • November 5, 2012 – City Council approved the Edina Community Health Committee's recommendation for the city fund and launch a pilot community garden program at Yorktown Park. • November 2012 — do.town met with the Southdale YMCA to confirm their interest in partnering on a community garden project. • January 8, 2013 — The Park Board selected Ellen Jones and Dan Peterson to serve on the Yorktown Community Garden Work Group. • January 2013 – Planning began. Staff collected community garden data from 16 neighboring communities, compiled the data, completed a project timeline and prepared a draft Rules and Policies document. • February 12, 2013 — Park Board approved the draft Rules and Policies document. • March 12, 2013 — The Park Board held a public hearing and was asked to review and comment on the proposed community garden and parking lot. • April 2, 2013 – City Council approved the Yorl.town Park Pilot community garden and permanent 29 -space parking lot. • May 20, 2013 – Community Garden Grand Opening. The first year of the community garden was an opportunity for us to gather information on what residents wanted to make a successful and sustainable community garden. We had successes and also identified areas for improvement. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Overall, staff believe that the Yorktown Community Garden was a great success. There has been strong support from the residents in Edina. The community garden has 55 total plots. All 55 plots were rented (by Edina residents) and there were 43 people on a wait list. In July, we surveyed our gardeners on a variety of areas to determine levels of satisfaction (see attached survey). Key findings included: 8 1. 1 % said that they would definitely or probably sign up for a garden plot again next year. 45.5% said they would recommend that their friends who want to try community gardening try Yorktown. Based on these results, along with the number of people who expressed an interest in renting a plot, we have every reason to believe that the garden will sell out again in 2014. 72.7% stated that the quality of soil and drainage didn't meet expectations. 36.4% said that the design water supply, paths and fencing didn't meet expectations. Based on the results of the survey the city made the following improvements to address concerns: The complaint heard most often was dissatisfaction with drainage. In October, at the end of the growing season, 24" of poor soils including clay were removed to improve drainage. This decision was a collaborate decision made by Tim Zimmerman (City Horticulturist), Larry Cipolla (Master Gardener), and Bob Prestrud (Park Maintenance). The city hired Aqua Engineering to add a water supply line that runs from the fire station to supply the water to the garden. Four spigots will be added to make watering convenient in all areas of the garden. Initially, the community garden project was approved as a pilot project. Staff is requesting your approval that the Yorktown Park Community Garden become a permanent amenity in the park. Attachments: 2013 Gardeners Survey Community Garden Potluck Comments 2014 Registration and Garden Basics Information Community Garden Potluck Comments Monday, September 16, 2013 I have plot 43 and am surrounded on 3 sides with abandoned plots. All covered with weeds. Those weed seeds have blown into my plot and will be a huge problem next year. People who have abandoned their plots should lose them for serious gardeners on the waiting list. There is a terrible waste of vegetables rotting on the abandoned and neglected plots that could be collected and given to VEAP. Call those people and let them know that if they don't pick their produce this week, Edina will and donate it to VEAP. There is a bushel or two of produce that Edina could contribute to feed people Isn't that a reason for a community garden? • We have had a garden plot in Chanhassen for 3 years; very successful gardens. Two hoses— neve a problem sharing water. • Place a single overhead sprinkler in the center to water at 5 a.m. — not sure if it can be set according to real rain, but maybe a wireless system could work?? • Please auto sprinklers! • 1 feel the watering system should be automatic because four spigots and hoses will not work easily— dragging hoses is difficult for many of us. • 1 think you need to dig holes thru the hard pan with a post hole digger to fix the drainage problem. • Picnic tables — top of hill — under trees by apartment building. • Hoses on garden work well in Chanhassen; measure soil temperature or tell people when it is optimal to plant. • Put signs up on first row next to fence/parking. Reserved for gardeners. • Prefer no hoses, unless we have multiple connections. • Please consider one spigot at least on the end and two on each long side. • Please work out a way we can email each other at once —to exchange plants, ideas, requests for help, etc. • An empty/bare plot is an invitation to weeds. It is not only a problem for the proximate gardeners, but it leaves a negative impression for passersby. When a plot is abandoned, it could be planted with a 'ground cover'. If the abandonment occurs early in the season, this could be annual flower seeds. The flowers would attract pollinators to the gardens. If the abandonment occurs beyond this window, it could be planted in sorghum-sudan grass. This is an drought tolerant, none spreading, annual grass that grows very quickly, potentially reaching a height of several feet. It is a nitrogen fixer, prevents weed development, can be cut at the height of a foot or more and used as mulch, and can be finally cut down in the autumn to be used as a green manure that once worked into the soil improves the organic content and tilth. And, it is inexpensive seed, broadcast sowen. I've used it in my home gardens for two years, and have been impressed with it's utility and it's beauty. A bulletin board, either a physical structure or an electronic bulletin board (or both), solely for community gardeners. Both information and information requests could be posted by participants in the community garden. This could include your emails, gardener reports of problems, successes, products, process etc. An etiquette should be used to prevent the monopoly of single issue,'gossip/bully pulpit', or personal complaints, emphasizing the information access. This summer I, and apparently several other gardeners, saw unharvested produce, essentially wasted food. I appreciate that schedules run -amok, even for dedicated & hungry gardeners! And I know that as the plots become more successful, people will be more attentive to their harvesting (And hopefully to their weeding as well.). But food waste is an affront on so many levels. A gleaning program with a food shelf could be explored, allowing for timely harvest of produce that might otherwise be neglected by the plot holder. I know this is a complex issue, but I think it is a worthy one. I've talked to several gardeners who save seed from one harvest, to start the next season. This year I am doing the same with a successful pepper plant that I've grown. And, alot of plot holders seem to be starting their own plants at home. Perhaps seed saver exchange in the fall/starter plant exchange in the spring would be welcomed by plot holders. Along the same line, I always seem to have more seeds in a package than I can use in a season. Other gardeners have said the same thing. Maybe an early spring seed swap would be welcomed by plot holders. Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. If any of them are not clearly stated, or if you would like to discuss them, please do not hesitate to contact me. Liz Klaver Very nice event last night. It was nice to learn that so many people are planning to renew. wrote notes, but I wanted to make sure I clearly communicated my observations about the garden and the surrounding parks. 1. If it hasn't happened already, it would be good to do a short presentation on the survey to the Park and Rec board, given that so many people are planning to renew. It would also be good for them to know what was learned the first year and the additional improvements that will be made in 2014. They need to be salespeople for the program. 2. Yorktown is clearly still not "marked" as a park, with no signage for the park or the garden. It really would benefit from signage in 2014. That is a detail that really shouldn't slip another year. Of course, I'm a believer that all city parks should be marked - but this one in particular, since it is carved up by a parking lot, community garden, skate park and fire station, along with walking path that makes it seem more like a corridor than a park. It also needs some new amenities. If you are piping in drinkable water from the fire station, it should have a water faucet or two -probably both at the skate park and at the garden. Looking at the space as it has been built out, I think that a high quality horseshoe pit would be the easiest thing to fit into the park in a small space as an interim measure before other things are considered. 3. There ended up being somewhat challenging relations between the Y and the City over garden plots and the parking lot. It is best that the irritation on both sides is allowed to dissipate, as the Y - City partnership is the best opportunity for collaborative programming you could ever want. When you are thinking about raised beds for 2014, 1 think that you should think about raised bed for the Y - an issue to bring up with them. Any classes they night have for children or seniors would be much more workable with raised beds - and with raised beds, weeding, is so much easier, and gravity takes care of any drainage problems. Gardening classes and cooking classes should be co-sponsored by the Y and the city, unless the city would like to bring Community Ed in as a new partner. 4. Currently, the City and Community Ed are in some ways competitors for community programs. That is really not necessary - or positive. Working together, you two would come up with much better programming than happens today, and through joint planning bring more Edina residents into both group's programs. Our overall city goal of getting our citizens more active and in that continual learning mode is a deep value that everyone should share. Why not have community ed classes as the Y, or Y classes in community ed space - or joint programs? The only obstacle is an excessive desire to control everything. 5. On the other end of the city is the Edina Senior Center. If the city is serious about broadening community garden concepts in 2014, doesn't it make sense to have some kind of community gardens on or near the space joinly operated by Edina Library and the Senior Center? Look at what a senior population has done at 7500 York to illustrate the potential. Pretty clearly classroom spaces in both parts of the building could be used for community education. We could look at the library's collection on gardening and try to build it up, directing the public from the city website to the library as an information source on library resources. 6. I'm going to talk with Larry about a community garden in or near the Colony, which is my apartment/condo complex between Fairview Southdale Hospital and Xerxes. There is land close to or in the frontage road of the Crosstown that might be ideal for such an application. A lot of people are going to be reluctant to plow up additional city parkland for parks, but may have less reason to oppose use of government owned land such as that in highway right of ways - basically growing weeds. I don't know if my suggestion is practical but others are. 7. Back to the garden. Hoses work perfectly in Chanhassen - no problems whatsoever. Vandalism is a program that can hit any public resources. People steal things. That calls for decent security (such as noise triggered lighting at night) and fences, but should never cause a city to simply leave facilities unbuilt or make them very hard for people to use. Likewise, it would be great to have a tool shed, including long and short tools. Such a shed could be built by another Eagle project (those are going on all the time) and the tools could be donated or bought cheap at garage sales. Mark them City of Edina Property - and they will be much less desirable to thieves. 8. I'm very supportive of redoing the tilling and soil preparation. Hopefully most people who want to maintain their poll should be able to do so. Once the garden has been redesigned, you should first let those gardeners know if they can keep their plot and then let them do so. If not, the ramaining gardeners should be able to pick freely from all the unclaimed plots in the garden. It will be much easier for them if they clearly see what is left. Then after that is done, communicate with the wait list people - with what is still left - and then if anything is left, open it up to the community gardeners. I would recommend that could consider with lots that are being reworked to put in more 10 by 10 plots and creating a little bit more of a price difference between the two. If you do this, we may be able to get between 60-70 plots in the garden without expanding it. 9. The critical issue, with the late snow cover, the less that perfect tilling and the monson rains, which undid most of the good done by the tilling, following by weeks of hot dry weather to thoroughly bake the soil, was "when to plant" and "what do to more completely prepared the soil." I planted in mud and as a result lost all my tomato plants. I should have waited - but didn't. Not only should we be monitoring soil temperatures, but we should be telling people - don't plant your tomatoes yet - if they aren't going to do well as a result. I like the early opening, so people really have a chance to plant their cold weather plants - if the soil is ready, but those dates should be decided right when they are going to happen - cold plant planting opening on xx, warm weather planting opening on xx. With things like lettuce, in a normal year, one can risk planting as early as March 15 and if one replants, have lettuce from May 1 to October 15. Most warm weather plants can be planted as late as June 20 and produce a full crop - earlier is better, if conditions are right, but not necessary. I would like to have Larry be asked to make those calls. 10. Another thing that might be covered is how long on can safely store plants in small containers if the planting season is delayed. They tend to overgrow their containers and become unsightly - which may or may not be a problem. You can buy plants much before you are able to safely plant them and once again Larry might speak up on when to plant. If you buy plants, given that they are typical sold in 4-6 packs, that is often too much for a garden. If gardeners are encouraged to communicate beforehand, they can split plant packs, have a greater variety of things and not spend so much money. And another note - all the plants I bought at the Edina Plant Sale did poorly. I would never go there again as a source. Others may have had better luck, but I went to a nursery out in Chaska that sells lots of heirloom vegetables - that their plants were much healthier - would have produced fantastically if they had better conditions. Pre -communication between gardeners last year wasn't possible due to schedule, but that is different in 2014. Considering all the hurdles that got in the way, I consider the first year a good success. Thanks, Joel • It was nice to meet you yesterday. Thanks for organizing the end of season pot luck! I just had an idea for those little plots at the front end of the garden. People planted flowers in their garden spaces just to have flowers to look at. Maybe there are people who either (1) just want flowers or (2) want flowers in addition to the garden space. What if you opened up those plots for people to "rent" either free or at a very low price with the condition that they had to plant flowers that attract bees (and aren't too tall) and leave most of the flowers in the garden (as opposed to using it as a cutting garden and taking them home to enjoy). You could give first dibs to people who are also renting a garden plot because people might get tired of going out to weed just that tiny a plot -- unless you also gave people who took care of a little flower plot (but didn't have a garden plot) priority on the waiting list for a garden plot for the next year. Survey Results Page 1 of 5 View Summary i__—__ Browse Responses)) PAGE: 1. Which of these statements best describes your personal gardening experience? Response Response Percent Count This is my first gardening 13.6% experience as an adult. I have grown container flowers and vegetables, but have little 9.1% or no experience with a garden plot. have had a community or private garden plot(s) in 45.5% the past, but not in recent years. I have been a gardener most of 31.8% my adult life. Comments Show replies answered question skipped question 2. How did you first hear about the garden? (Check all that apply.) Edina Sun -Current Star -Tribune 3 2 10 7 3 22 0 Response Response Percent Count 13.3% 2 53.3% 8 answered question 15 skipped question 7 https : //www. surveym onl,,ey. com/sr. aspx? sm=UHyLCDC WEzKbHB fzg_2... 10/30/2013 Survey Results 2. How did you first hear about the garden? (Check all that apply.) Page 2 of 5 Word -of -Mouth 13.3% 2 Posters 0.0% 0 Edina Community Channel 16 0.0% 0 Southdale YMCA 6.7% 1 Emails 20.0% 3 Other (please specify) 9 Show replies answered question 15 skipped question 7 3. Which of these statements best describes how you felt about this new opportunity? Response Response Percent Count It sounded fun; I thought I'd try 19.0% 4 it out. I thought about it for awhile and decided to sign up for a 4.8% 1 plot. I was really excited because I really wanted to 76.2% 16 have a garden this year. Comments 5 Show replies answered question 21 skipped question 1 https://www.surveymonlcey.com/sr.aspx?sm=UHyLCDC WEzKbHBfzg_2... 10/30/2013 Survey Results Page 3 of 5 4. How do you rate the following details related to the garden? Please use the comment box to discuss any issues with the garden that did not meet your expectations. Communications From City Staff City Response to Your Questions and Concerns City Response to Problems (e.g. Rabbits and Low Spots) Classes Taught By Larry Cipola, Master Gardener Onsite Advice by Larry Cipola, Master Gardener Convenience (e.g. location and parking) Design (e.g. water supply, paths and fencing) Your Plot (e.g. size, quality of soil and drainage) Costs (e.g. fees and garden supplies) Friendliness and "Community" Among the Gardeners Didn't Meet Met Exceeded Rating Rating N/A Expectations Expectations Expectations Average Count 4.8%(1) 38.1% (8) 57.1%(12) 0.0% 2.52 21 https://www.surveymonkey.com/sr.aspx?sm=UTlyLCDCWEzKbMfzg_2... 10/30/2013 (0) 13.6%(3) 18.2%(4) 54.5%(12) 13.6% 2.47 22 18.2%(4) 54.5%(12) 27.3%(6) 0.0% 2.09 22 4.8%(1) 23.8%(5) 38.1%(8) 33.3% 2.50 21 4.8%(1) 19.0%(4) 33.3%(7) 42.9% 2.50 21 0.0%(0) 52.4% (11) 47.6%(10) 0 2.48 21 (% 36.4%(8) 54.5%(12) 9.1%(2) 0.0% 1.73 22 72.7%(16) 22.7%(5) 4.5%(1) 0.0% 1.32 22 0.0%(0) 72.7%(16) 22.7%(5) 4.5% 2.24 22 0.0%(0) 31.8%(7) 68.2%(15) 0.0% 2.68 22 Other (please specify) 8 Show replies answered question 22 skipped question 0 https://www.surveymonkey.com/sr.aspx?sm=UTlyLCDCWEzKbMfzg_2... 10/30/2013 Survey Results Page 4 of 5 5. Please check each of the statements that describe you current feelings and future plans regarding community gardening. 1 am glad that I signed up for a garden plot this year. I have been able to work around the weather and damp soil conditions. I expect to have a decent crop by the end of the growing season. definitely or probably will sign up for a garden plot again next year. I would recommend that my friends who want to try community gardening try Yorktown. I would like to serve on a Yorktown Garden Advisory Council. (Please provide contact information below.) Response Response Percent Count 81.8% 18 54.5% 12 27.3% 6 81.8% 18 45.5% 10 36.4% 8 Comments or Contact Information 9 Show replies answered question 22 skipped question 0 6. Please suggest changes you would like to see to the Yorktown garden before the 2014 planting year or take this opportunity to share any other feedback you might have. answered question 18 skipped question 4 https://www.surveymotikey. com/sr.aspx?sm=UHyLCDCWEzKbHBfzg_2... 10/30/2013 Survey Results Page 5 of 5 6. Please suggest changes you would like to see to the Yorktown garden before the 2014 planting year or take this opportunity to share any other feedback you might have. Response Count Showreplies 18 answered question 18 skipped question 4 https://www.swveymonlcey.com/sr.aspx?sm=UHyLCDCWEzKbHBfzg_2... 10/30/2013 FREE Spring Garden Basics Classes Master Gardener Larry Cipolla will lead interactive sessions on all you want to know about gardening. Come with your all your garden questions! Friday, January 17 6:30 — 8 p.m. - Backyard Composting: The Easy Way Friday, February 21 6:30 — 8 p.m. - Seeds and Seedlings: Starting Seeds Inside and Outside Friday, March 21 6:30 — 8 p.m. - Basic Vegetable and Herb Gardening: Garden Planning Designs Friday, April 11 6:30 — 8 p.m. - Advanced Vegetable and Herb Gardening Classes will be held at Southdale YMCA, 7355 York Avenue Yorktown Park Community Garden Yorktown Park Community Garden is located at 7335 York Avenue, Edina. The garden is located just north and east of the Southdale YMCA and Edina York Avenue Fire Station. A total of 53 plots are available for rental. Priority and rental rates for 2014 plots: January 6, 2014, registration begins for, Edina residents that were previous renters January 27, 2014, registration begins for Edina residents February 17, 2014: registration begins for previous plot holders that live or work, in Edina March 3, 2014: registration begins for Non-residents Plots are assigned on a first-come, first -serve basis A waiting list will be maintained if garden plots fill, which is based on the date the application form is received. Gardeners may rent one plot per household. Payment can be in the form of a check payable to: City of Edina. We also accept VISA, MasterCard and American Express. There will be a fee of $30 for a I Ox10 and $35 for a I0xl5 plot. Garden plots are assigned to one person only and are riot transferable. Others may garden at your site, but the responsibility for payment of fees, cleanup and other duties at the site will be the responsibility of the individual whose name is assigned to the plot. For youth interested in gardening, Edina has an Edible Playground at Lewis Park. This Edible Playground is designed to give youth hands on fun experiences related to gardening, healthy eating and being physical. For more information contact Kristin at kaarsvold@edinamn.gov or call 952-826-0433. To: Park Board Agenda Item #: VI.C. From: Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Action N Discussion ❑ Date: November 12, 2013 Information ❑ Subject: Bike Edina Task Force Representative Action Requested: Appoint a new Park Board representative to the Bike Edina Task Force. Information I Background: Park Board member Ellen Jones has been serving as a representative of the Park Board to the Bike Edina Task Force. After three years, she has decided to resign from her position. Mission: The Bike Edina Task. Force (BETF) supports implementation of the approved City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan that serves all levels of bicyclists, connects key destinations including safe routes to schools, and integrates with the Twin Cities' regional bike network. Our vision is a progressive bicycle - friendly community where citizens can integrate cycling into their daily lives. The Bike Edina Task Force seeks a Park Board representative in order to communicate interrelated topics to both groups. The mission of the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) is to advance bicycling in Edina by: • Advocating for a complete bicycle transportation network that serves cyclists of all ages and abilities, safely and conveniently; • Serving as a voice and resource for city staff and elected officials, school district, and the community on bicycling -related issues; • Furthering public awareness and acceptance of bicycling as a fun, safe, convenient, healthy and sustainable mode of transportation and form of recreation, year around; and • Working collaboratively with other organizations to advance our vision for a progressive bicycle - friendly community where everyone can integrate cycling into their daily lives. A Park Board member could choose to be either a full member of the Task Force or a liaison. Attendance is expected at all regularly scheduled Bike Edina Task Force meetings and subcommittee meetings. If a member cannot attend a meeting, he or she should notify the Chairperson as soon as possible. BETF members are expected to participate on subcommittees and to attend all subcommittee meetings. A Park Board representative that is acting as a member would count toward the 15 member BETF limit and City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 the term would be independent of term on Park Board (although a person could always resign). A liaison would be able to participate in all discussions and on subcommittees but would not be able to vote at regular meetings. Regular meetings of the Bike Edina Task Force are held the second Thursday of the month at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall, unless otherwise announced. To: Park Board From: Ann Kattreh Parks and Recreation Director Date: November 12, 2013 Subject: Council Updates Action Requested: No Action is Necessary. Information / Background: Agenda Item #: VILA. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Please see the City Council Updates from their October 14 and November 4, City Council Meetings. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Council Updates October 14, 2013 • Approved the proposed Sportsdome Project and directed staff to prepare a financing plan, construction plans and specifications. If all goes according to plan, the project will open in December 2014. The Council's support of the proposed Sportsdome Project was the highlight of the night. The Council's approval is the culmination of discussions and studies that started with this City Council and staff back in 2011. Our Parks & Recreation Department staff, led by Director Ann Kattreh, can be congratulated for their efforts to build a supportive coalition of City Council Members, Park Board Members and youth sports associations' members to help bring this project from concept to reality. It will be a very nice addition to our city. November 4, 2013 • Approved the Cuningham Group contract for architectural and engineering services for the Sports Dome, outdoor refrigerated ice and Braemar Arena Improvements. • Approved a resolution for the filing of a grant application with the Hennepin Youth Sports Program for the sports dome ($325,000). To: Park Board From: Ann Kattreh Parks and Recreation Director Date: November 12, 2013 Subject: Founders Day Celebration Invitation Action Requested: No Action is Necessary. Information / Background: Please see the "Founders Day Celebration Invitation". UJ fans Agenda Item #: VII.B. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information October 21, 2013 Ann Kattreh, Liaison Edina Park Board 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MM 55424 Dear Ann: On behalf of the City of Edina, Edina Historical Society and the Quasquicentennial Committee, I am writing to invite you and your Board to join its on Thursday, December 12, 2013 at Edina City Hall to celebrate Founders Day. Founders Day is the 125"' anniversary of the vote in 1888 to form the Village of Edina and will mark the end of festivities that included an historic house tour, EdinaScapes ail show, a history -themed July 4°i parade, and neighborhood and school reunions. We would be delighted to have you join its for a frill evening of events but specifically Hope that you can attend the Founders Day program fi•om 7 to 8 p.m. Historical Society Executive Director Marci Matson promises "125 years of Edina history in 45 minutes." The program will include introductions of founding family descendents and public officials interspersed with short vignettes from historic letters, diaries and public records and songs performed by the Edina Chorale. You also are welcome to join us earlier in the evening. Founders Day events will begin at 5 p.m. with open houses at the historic Cahill School and Orange Hall, on Eden Avenue across fi•om Edina City Hall, At 6 p.m., festivities will move to Edina City Hall with a social hour and music by the Edina Chorale. Throughout the evening, the City Hall lobby will feature a display of historic photographs and a timelinc created by Edina's Human Rights & Relations Commission of Edina's human rights milestones. At the end of the evening, the City of Edina will host a reception at City Hall with cake and other refreshments. We hope you and your Board are able to join the celebration on Founders Day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely yowl, J r i Bennett lina City Council Member 4003 Lynn Avenue Edina MN 55416 j on ibenn ett12@comcast m et CITY OP EDINA 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www,EdinaMN.gov. 952-927-8861 , Fax 952-826-0390