HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-10-12 Park Board Packeto e
�s���2, Cn
• t�c�Riaea ���
AGENDA
Regular Meeting of the Edina Park Board
Tuesday, October 12, 2010, 7:00 P.M.
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
4801 West 50th Street
PARK BOARD MEETING PROCEDURES
During "Public Hearings, " the Chair will ask for public comment after City staff members make
their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your
comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the
efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines:
*Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes or less. The Chair will modify
presentation times, as deemed necessary.
*Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the
matter under consideration.
*In order to maintain a comfortable environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs,
clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not
allowed.
PARK BOARD AGENDA
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
* Approval of Tuesday, September 14, 2010 Park Board Minutes.
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. *2011-2015 Capital Improvement Plans for Enterprise Facilities.
B. *2011 Fees and Charges.
C. *Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail.
D. Community Advisory Team Report — Member Ellen Jones
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
During "Public Comments, " the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to
speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals must limit their presentations to three
minutes or less and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and
closed or a matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the Park Board to
respond to their comments. Instead, the Park Board might direct the matter to staff for
consideration at a future meeting.
• IV. UPDATES FROM STAFF (information only — no action requested)
V. PARK 130ARD COMMENTS
VI. * ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you
need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large print documents or
something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
* These are agenda items that require or request Park Board action.
• Memo
To: Edina Park Board
From: John Keprios, Directo(
Edina Park and Recreaio Department
Date: October 6, 2010
Re: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2010, PARK BOARD MEETING STAFF REPORT.
Enclosed you should find the following items:
1. Tuesday, September 14, 2010, Park Board Meeting Minutes.
2. Tuesday, October 12, 2010 Agenda.
3. 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Plans for Enterprise Facilities.
4. Proposed 2011 Proposed Fees and Charges.
5. 36 Pages from Power Point Presentation at Joint Work Session.
6. September 20, 2010 Letter from Cora Jane Blanchard.
7. Invitation to Reception for City Manager Scott Neal.
The following is the monthly Staff Report concerning each item on the agenda with the
exception of Approval of the Minutes, Public Comment and Park Board Comment.
PARK BOARD MEETING IN THE
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
EDINA CITY HALL
4801 WEST 50 STREET
The Tuesday, October 12, 2010, Park Board meeting will be at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers at Edina City Hall. If you are unable to attend, please contact either Office
Coordinator, Janet Canton, at 952-826-0435 JCanton@ci.edina.mn.us or me at 952-826-0430
JKeprios@ci.edina.mn.us.
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
* Tuesday, September 14, 2010 Park Board meeting.
The Park Board is asked to read the minutes from this Park Board meeting and feel free
to make any changes or corrections that may not accurately reflect the discussion that
took place on September 14, 2010.
Formal Park Board action is requested on this agenda item.
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. *2011-2015 Capital Improvement Plans for Enterprise Facilities
Enclosed is a copy of the "2011-2015 Capital Improvement Plans for Enterprise
Facilities." Each facility manager will give a brief presentation of their proposed new
Capital Improvement Plan projects and not go over all projects that have been previously
approved.
By the October 12`" Park Board meeting, the City Council will have already conducted a
work session with enterprise facility managers regarding their proposed 2011-2015 CIP;
however, it is still important for the Park Board to make a formal recommendation. The
Council has not taken any formal action on the proposed 2011-2015 CIP and they would
like to have the benefit of the Park Board's recommendation before taking that formal
action.
Formal Park Board action is requested on this agenda item.
B. *2011 Proposed Fees and Charges
Enclosed is a copy of proposed Park and Recreation Department fees and charges for
2011. As you will notice, staff is proposing very few increases mainly due to difficult
economic times and to keep the fees affordable but still at a competitive level in the
market place.
The enclosed proposed fees and charges for 2011 schedule shows increased fees in bold
print. If the fee is not new or different from the previous year, then the fee appears in
regular print.
According to City Code, the Park Board is asked to recommend fees and charges to the
City Council. The philosophy that has long been followed in the City of Edina is that fees
and charges are set at a level that accomplishes the following:
• Users pay their fair share of the costs associated with the programs and facilities they
use today and should not place that burden on future taxpayers (user fee based
philosophy).
• Keep programs and activities affordable to the maximum number of residents.
• Cover the costs associated with the activity or facility whenever possible.
• Find a way to allow all residents to participate in basic recreation programs regardless
of their ability to pay (i.e., Edina Community Foundation Grant -In -Aid Fund).
In other words, we could probably charge higher fees in some cases without seeing a
significant drop in participation, whereas higher fees in other programs would see a
significant drop in participation and/or rentals.
I believe that it is important to keep in mind our mission when establishing fees and
charges. There is a reason why the private sector does not offer a myriad of Art Centers.
Art Centers are not a profitable business, but are a highly valued service for communities.
Some of our enterprise facilities make a profit and some do not. The Art Center Board
makes recommendations to the City Council on proposed fees and charges specifically for
the Art Center.
We do our best to run an efficient business -like enterprise, while remaining competitively
priced in the marketplace. In setting fees and charges, I ask that you please be mindful
that our mission is not to maximize profits.
There are a few fees to call your attention to as proposed by staff.
• Due to the establishment of a formal Edina Art Center Board, they propose Edina Art
Center fees and charges directly to the City Council, and therefore those fees and charges
are no longer the Park Board's responsibility. Therefore, the Art Center fees are not
included in this packet.
You will notice that we are offering new youth recreation programs through Reach
Education Solutions and Once Upon a Time Parties. Both are private contractors that we
hire to provide unique recreation programs and we take a percentage of the registrations to
cover our costs. I would also call your attention to the reduction in the Non -Resident
Patron Card for Braemar Golf Course. Our Non -Resident Patron Card sales have been on
the decline and it is staffs recommendation to make the patron card more valuable, which
in turn encourages more rounds of golf. Golf Course Manager Todd Anderson is also
recommending a 50 cent reduction in the Junior greens fee for the two executive courses
to create a slightly larger separation of the 9 -hole championship course rate.
The $5.00 increase in fees for the Adventure Peak Birthday Package is requested to
remain competitive but not over -priced in the market place.
The $5.00/hour increase in ice rental at Braemar Arena is to keep pace with expenses,
including the new revenue bond debt payments for the renovation project. This also keeps
us competitive in the market place where we are not the highest fee in the Twin Cities but
rather mid-range.
Enterprise facility managers (except the Edina Art Center) will be present to answer
questions about their proposed fees and charges.
I recommend approval of staff proposed 2011 fees and charges.
Formal Park Board action is requested on this agenda item.
C. *Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
Let me first begin by saying thank you to all Park Board members who have taken so much
time and energy to stay involved with and informed about this important and controversial
issue. As I have mentioned many times before, the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
process has been ongoing for the past ten years. It is rewarding to know that the time has
come to make final decisions one way or another.
As a matter of process, it is my recommendation that the Park Board hear an abbreviated
power point presentation from Kelly Grissman, Senior Manager of Planning for Three
Rivers Park District. After Kelly's presentation, the Park Board should ask questions of
me, Kelly Grissman and other Three Rivers Park District staff that are present. After the
Park Board has asked questions of staff, I recommend that any public present be welcomed
to speak at the meeting.
At the October 5 Council meeting, the City Council decided that the issue of whether or
• not to allow public comment at the Park Board meeting is left to the Park Board and
specifically the Park Board Chairman to decide. It is my recommendation to allow the
public to speak to this agenda item but limit each individual speaker to 3 minutes. The
Council has decided to conduct a Public Hearing on this matter on Tuesday, December 7,
2010 at their regular Council meeting. There will not be a Public Hearing at a Park Board
meeting.
Enclosed are 36 color pages of Kelly Grissman's 54 page power point presentation that was
shown at the Joint Work Session on September 29, 2010. I believe that these 36 pages do
an excellent job summarizing the issue and presenting the facts.
The first five pages referring to the 2006 Needs Assessment Survey show that the
overwhelming majority of Edina residents need, desire and support additional walking and
biking trails. It also shows that exercise, fitness and enjoying nature are the most
important reasons for wanting walking and biking trails in Edina.
The next several pages summarize the Community Assessment Team's (CAT) role and the
findings of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). There is also a summary of
the 30 -day public comment period for the EAW. There are also colored maps showing the
plans and developments in place to the east and west of Edina.
The following pages show "Key CAT Considerations," which include Social, Technical
and Economic Assessments. The factual results of those studies are shown on the five
"Key CAT considerations" pages. One of the main concerns about this trail has been and
continues to be the close proximity of adjacent homes. I find it interesting that there are
eight homes within less than 25 feet of the road -based route; however, only three homes
less than 25 from the trail on a creek -based route. The average distance from house to trail
is only 90 feet on a road -based route; whereas, an average of 175 feet for a creek -based
route.
With a road -based route, there are still 82 back yards adjacent to the trail; whereas, there
are 216 back yards in a creek -based route. There are clearly more residential yards
adjacent to the trail in the creek -based route (243) compared to only 147 adjacent
residential yards in a road -based route. Conversely, there are only 31 driveway crossings
in the creek -based route vs. 60 driveways in the road -based route. The road -based option
has three times the number of road crossings. I believe this data shows that a creek -based
route would be a safer route (fewer driveways and road crossings); however, at the expense
of more adjacent homeowners losing their privacy that have enjoyed in the past.
This is not to downplay the impact on residents who own property closest to the proposed
trail in the creek -based option. There will be a significant impact on their privacy and in
some cases their quality of life. Of all the issues raised in this debate, that is one of the
most challenging in my view because there are not good alternatives that are in the best
interests of the greater majority. The harsh reality is that, without written covenants in
place, those who purchase land next to publicly owned property are at risk for future
development. To Three Rivers Park District's credit, they have identified an outstanding
recreational trail through Edina that does not require condemnation of any private land.
Kelly's power point slides also show excellent samples of a typical regional trail including
a photo example of the road -based type trail, such as Bassett Creek Regional Trail. As you
will notice, the road -based route does not mean that the bike trail is on the street (a
common misconception).
It is Kelly's intention to have more information available to bring to the Park Board
meeting on the 12th that addresses how many feet of boardwalk are needed and exactly
where it might be needed to complete the trail for a creek -based route. Included are some
examples of boardwalks, such as the Lake Independence Regional Trail and Dakota Rail
Regional Trail. Three Rivers Park District staff has been requested by Council to study
alternative materials to help minimize the noise on boardwalks.
The financing vehicles and projects costs are also shown in the attachments. The creek -
based route is expected to cost approximately $20 million to build; however, the road -
based route is estimated to cost approximately $17 million.
The three options for the Park Board's consideration (same as presented to the Council last
week) are:
1. Creek -based option
2. Road -based option
3. No route option
The pros and cons are also shown for the creek -based and road -based options. In my view,
the two main "pros" for the creek -based option are to provide a high quality recreational
trail experience and it creates a safe off-road access to the Edina High School campus. The
main "cons" of a road -based route are the fact that it does not accomplish the two main
reasons why the overwhelming majority of Edina residents want trails (exercise and enjoy
nature); plus it does not provide a safe access to the Edina High School campus. The
stated pros and cons in the presentation are factual and speak for themselves but I believe
those to be very compelling reasons for choosing a creek -based option.
I support and recommend a creek -based option but not without some further
recommendations and conditions. I feel strongly that the trail alignment through Walnut
Ridge Park should be on the south side of the park where it was originally proposed, as
opposed to routing it past the hockey rink and to the north side of the park. Either route
still ends up at the same point on the east end of the park. The north side of Walnut Ridge
Park was proposed to avoid flooding issues. The south side route is a viable option and in
my view should be the preferred alignment through the park.
The Council expressed concerns about boardwalk noise. I believe it is appropriate to
further recommend that all reasonable and affordable accommodations in design should be
taken to minimize boardwalk noise. I further recommend that the final creek -based
alignments should be engineered in a manner that minimizes the amount of required
boardwalks, their height and close proximity to households.
• I would also suggest that we request that Three Rivers Park District offer to provide
homeowners the option to have buffers (similar to their past practice with their other
regional trails) where reasonable and at Three Rivers expense. Buffers could include
fencing and/or landscaping (trees, shrubs and/or building berms). I ask that this offer be
extended to those homeowners that are within 25 feet of the trail.
We understand that the exact placement of the trail will have to be determined in the
engineering phase. I would recommend that all reasonable steps be taken to minimize the
amount of boardwalks in a balancing act that also attempts to minimize the impact on the
environment (wetlands, water quality and vegetation). We also recognize that there are
construction costs implications that also compete in that complex balancing act of keeping
the trail furthest from private property lines as possible. In our fully developed
community, there is not an abundance of undeveloped city -owned property that can be
converted to wetlands to meet mitigation requirements. Therefore, the exact placement
and design of a creek -based route needs to be mindful of those limitations.
There are concerns about project delays due to lack of available funding (grants) or other
unforeseen factors. One strategy would be to place a time limit deadline on the easements
offered to Three Rivers Park District to complete the project within a reasonable time
frame. If Three Rivers fails to complete the project within a given timeframe, the City of
Edina should reserve the right to retract that easement. We will need to further discuss this
issue with Three Rivers Park District to better understand and agree to a reasonable
timeframe. In my view, the language should be drafted mainly to protect the City of
Edina's interests in the case that the trail does not get developed after an extraordinary
amount of time passed. One idea might be to consider language that states the easement
shall expire after "X" number of years unless reasonable effort, progress and funding has
been made or secured by Three Rivers Park District to fulfill its obligation of the
agreement. I propose we assign this one to our legal counsel to draft a recommendation for
the Council's consideration.
There is enormous benefit to Edina residents to have the Three Rivers Park District cover
all construction costs and all ongoing maintenance and operation costs. The anticipated
operational costs to the City of Edina would include those law enforcement calls when
called upon to be the first responder; plus, any winter plowing and maintenance during the
winter months but only if the City of Edina chooses to plow the trail during the winter
months. That operational decision would be made on an annual basis by the City of Edina.
I encourage Park Board members to see this issue in a positive light that creek -based
option brings 7 and'/2 miles of new walking/biking trails into Edina which is equivalent to
just over 14 acres of new park amenities. It's like adding another park almost the size of
Arneson Acres Park (15 acres) or another park larger than Weber Park (12 acres).
Over ten years ago, the City of Edina asked Hennepin Parks to provide services and
facilities within the City of Edina. Edina elected officials felt at the time that it is deserved
due to the large amount of tax revenues that are funneled from Edina taxpayers annually to
the Hennepin County park system. Three Rivers Park District has invested approximately
$100,000 to date in this effort to make this become a reality without any assurance that the
City Council would in the end approve this project. I believe it's time to make that vision a
reality and provide a much desired amenity that will be enjoyed by Edina residents for
many years to come. This connection to our neighbors to the east and west will open the
door to a trail system that is the envy of the United States. Minneapolis has been named
the number one bike friendly city in the country. I believe that this amenity will be another
tremendous amenity and reason for people to want to live, work and raise families in the
community.
Another benefit of this trail (whether it's road -based or creek -based) is to reverse the trend
of childhood obesity. We have at least one generation of children that are at serious health
risk due to the obesity issue. Experts tell us it's largely due to the electronic video game
era that keeps kids indoors and lacking exposure to nature and lack healthy physical
activity. This trail is another important piece of that complex issue that will help combat
childhood obesity and serious and expensive future health care issues.
In my view, a road -based route is not the best option because I don't believe it would
benefit Edina residents as much as a creek -based route. As a result, I don't believe that a
road -based route would get used and enjoyed nearly as much as a creek -based route.
Based on the factual results of our 2006 Community Attitude and Interest Survey, the
overwhelming majority of Edina residents want more biking and walking trails for the
purpose of exercise, fitness and enjoying nature. In my view, that validates the majority of
resident's need and desire for a creek -based option walking/biking trail.
In conclusion, I recommend that the Park Board propose to the City Council a creek -based
option regional trail with the additional recommendations mentioned earlier regarding the
trail alignment at Walnut Ridge Park, easement rights, buffers and the issues involving the
boardwalks.
Formal Park Board action is requested on this agenda item.
D. Community Advisory Team Report — Member Ellen Jones
Park Board member Ellen Jones will give the Park Board a verbal report on the results of
their latest meeting of the Community Advisory Team which is working to recommend a
process to decide what to do with the former Public Works Building site that has been
vacated.
No formal Park Board action is requested on this agenda item.
IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
During "Public Comments, " the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would
like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals must limit their presentations
to three minutes or less and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was
previously held and closed or a matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should
not expect the Park Board to respond to their comments. Instead, the Park Board might
direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
V. UPDATES FROM STAFF
Staff will provide a verbal update on other Park and Recreation Department matters of
interest to the Park Board that are not on the agenda and do not require any formal action.
VI. PARK BOARD COMMENTS
This is the opportunity for Park Board members to provide comments on park and
recreation related matters not on the regular agenda.
• Minutes of the
Edina Park Board
September 14, 2010
Edina City Hall, Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT: Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus, Ellen Jones, Jennifer
Kenney, Austin Dummer, Felix Pronove, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Louise
Segreto
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Lough
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 9, 2010 PARK BOARD WORK
SESSION MINUTES. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES
APPROVED.
Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 13, 2010 PARK BOARD MINUTES.
Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
II. WELCOME NEW STUDENT MEMBERS
Mr. Hulbert introduced and welcomed Austin Dummer and Felix Pronove, the two new
student Park Board members.
III.NEW BUSINESS
A. 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Plan — Mr. Keprios gave the Park Board a brief power
point presentation to summarize the 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Plan.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he is recommending $30,000 be appropriated
as seed money for planning and developing the proposed Edina Veterans Memorial. He
noted that he envisions this money to help jump start the project by paying for the
engineering and architect fees. He indicated that once the committee has their final plan
they will bring it before the Park Board and ultimately the City Council. Mr. Keprios
pointed out that the committee will be fundraising for the rest of the project which they
hope to be somewhere between $200,000 and $300,000.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the committee did take a vote on the site for
the memorial at their last meeting and it was decided that Utley Park is where they would
like to place the Veterans Memorial. He explained that the committee put together a list
of criteria and from that list came up with four possible sites. Each member visited those
four sites and shared their opinions at the meeting. At that time a vote was taken and
they overwhelmingly voted for Utley Park as the site. Mr. Keprios indicated that he
thinks they will ultimately need to go through a public hearing process before the site and
plans can be formally approved.
Mr. Meyer asked if staff will oversee the $30,000. Mr. Keprios replied that the $30,000
does not go to the Edina Community Foundation but will remain in the city coffers and is
something that he will manage.
Mr. Peterson commented that it seems to him that the social center of the city is moving
towards Centennial Lakes. He noted that he doesn't know if it meets all the criteria but it
would seem to him that someday with the promenade from the Galleria and Target all the
way down to the lakes would be a good place for a Fourth of July parade. Mike Goergen,
Chair of the Veteran's Memorial Committee, indicated that Centennial Lakes was one of
the locations that they did their due diligence on utilizing the criteria. He explained that
the general consensus on Centennial Lakes was that it was too commercialized because
they are looking for a quieter place where people will be able to meditate, etc.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that another site that was considered was Arneson Acres Park
but the committee felt it was too residential. The committee did discuss talking to the
Edina Historical Society to see if they can come up with something where the public
could go to view records that are available.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that later in the process they found out that Utley Park was also
the site chosen by a group that formed back in the 1940's to be the site of a veterans
memorial. They even drew up a small plan and tried to fundraise for it; however, WWII
came about and the plan was never developed.
Mr. Keprios indicated that unless there are any strong feelings on the Park Board that the
committee should consider a different site then that is the direction they are going.
Mr. Meyer asked about the restrooms and if they are on track for updating at some point.
Mr. Keprios replied that they are probably due for some upgrade because they are very
old and will need to be looked at eventually.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that to do the parking lot at Garden Park it's going
to cost approximately $250,000. He noted that it is his intention to apply for another
youth sports grants since it will be serving such a large athletic complex. He commented
that if it were to happen it would allow for them to do additional capital projects that they
currently can't afford to do.
Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios how he defines maintenance versus capital because there
are some sites around the city where he thinks with a little more maintenance now they
may be able to delay some things awhile. Mr. Keprios replied that the asphalt
maintenance is an enormous and expensive challenge. He explained that they send
resurfacing professionals to their various sites to get their opinions to see if something
can be fixed or does it need to be replaced. Mr. Keprios stated that this has to be
analyzed every year and sometimes twice in the same year because they all age a little
. differently depending on the base. He added that they try their best to stay on top of that
with operating budget dollars.
Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if at some point you need more dollars are you able to
move some of the capital into the operating budget and if so how do you make those
decisions. Mr. Keprios replied there is over a $250,000 in the operating budget that is
called the hard paths and hard surface budget. He noted that it's difficult to keep up with
the infrastructure and that the path and hard surface budget is one that keeps getting
picked away at and they don't have the dollars to keep up with it. Mr. Keprios pointed
out that in the next three years they will have spent $800,000 on just asphalt and
unfortunately they have to rely on the capital plan to cover it because the operating
budget isn't large enough to cover it.
Ms. Segreto asked what the Natural Resource Inventory Assessment is. Mr. Keprios
responded that it's a study that the Park Board has requested. He explained it's basically
a study and an analysis of the natural resources and especially woodland areas. One of
the survey results will be to determine if there are some extremely valuable rare natural
resources that they need to be made aware of. In addition, it will tell them where they are
when it comes to managing things such as buckthorn control, plantings, etc. He indicated
that it basically maps out the parkland throughout the entire city, over 1500 acres, of
which many of those acres are wooded and determines how these natural resources
should be managed in the future. Mr. Keprios stated then another reason for delaying this
is because now that there is an Energy Environment Commission they may have a
different view on where the priorities are regarding natural resources and specifically
woodland areas, use of pesticides, etc. Ms. Segreto asked if the assessment is being done
by a private consultant company to which Mr. Keprios replied yes it would be a private
consulting firm and staff would bid the project.
Ms. Jones asked Mr. Keprios in regards to pathways if he has explored being able to get
any grants. She indicated there are livable grants with paths that somehow connect with
other bikeways, etc. Mr. Keprios replied that if there are other grant dollars that haven't
been explored he would like to know about them and would be happy to look into them.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that in regards to Countryside Park, the Waters
Development is in negotiations with the City Council on what their park dedication fee
will be. He noted that they could use some of those Park Development Fund dollars to do
some of the maintenance items at Countryside Park and perhaps pull some of the master
plan further up on the agenda. He commented that it is his view that those dollars should
go to serve the park closest to the development, so that might be another area where they
may have dollars coming in.
Mr. Keprios explained that for 2015 he had originally focused more of the dollars toward
accomplishing the rest of the master plan for Countryside Park. However, with dollars
possibly coming from the Water Development he has changed his focus to replacing the
warming house at Normandale Park. He indicated it's a tough call because what's going
to be the most important thing in 2015 probably won't be what it is now. He pointed out
the reason he chose this is because it's their highest attended playground program, there
is a large demographic population of kids in the neighborhood that is growing, there's a
lot of scheduled baseball and the hockey rink as well as the playground equipment is used
extensively. Mr. Keprios commented that he would not be offended if someone wanted
to make a different recommendation.
Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that they did a Needs Assessment Survey four
years ago to which 865 people responded, which is phenomenal, and gave them a 95%
level of confidence of the results. He indicated that the residents have a need for a wide
range of Park and Recreation facilities but first and foremost on the list with 86% is they
want more walking and biking trails as well as natural areas and wildlife habitat. He
noted that the idea of a recreation center came in second but the next highest on the list is
the development of outdoor athletic fields for sports. Mr. Keprios pointed out that Edina
is an aging community and therefore it's difficult to get a high percentage of support for
things like soccer fields and baseball fields. However, with a primarily more senior aged
population 31 % is pretty high for the support of athletic fields. Therefore, he does think
that validates the Pamela Park master plan new athletic field and would like to keep that
on the radar screen.
Mr. Keprios stressed that maintenance of the city parks as well as the walking/biking
trails are services that should receive the most attention by city officials over the next two
years.
Mr. Keprios stated that priority wise they are going to first and foremost replace and
repair what's broken. Also, the Veterans Memorial is high on the list with $30,000 seed
money. In addition, developing new pathways, pathway lights and trails are also high on
the priority list. He noted that he thinks they can complete the master plans at
Countryside Park and Pamela Park as they can afford to. Mr. Keprios commented that
eventually they may want to complete the master plan for Van Valkenburg Park, the
small section that can serve as a mini -park for the neighborhood.
Mr. Fronek commented that the next three years show an increase of $215,000, $195,000
and $140,000 as compared to what they approved last year. He asked Mr. Keprios to
comment on the increase, where those extra dollars are coming from and the thought
process that went into those increases. Mr. Keprios replied he is hoping as it goes
through the process that the dollars will be there between grants and possibly some other
sources. He indicated there is talk about franchise fees that the City Council is closing in
on and that those dollars would also go toward their parks capital plan. He noted that is
not just for this but also for some of their enterprise facilities that struggle and don't have
the capital dollars to make their improvements.
Mr. Keprios again noted that the five year capital improvement plan changes. It should
change slightly every year to adjust to the needs and other priorities that may surface. He
indicated that it gives us a good road map and a good idea of how much money they are
going to need to get the projects done.
Ms. Jones asked how old is the playground equipment at Countryside Park and is it slated
for next year because it's a safety issue. Mr. Keprios explained that through the master
4
plan process they want to relocate the location of the play equipment. In addition, it's a
one of a kind in the Edina system and was somewhat experimental in that it's all creative
play equipment and not traditional equipment. He noted they were informed that kids
would be wildly attracted to it; however, that didn't turn out to be the case and he heard
from several residents over the past several years that they don't like it as well as
traditional playground equipment. Mr. Keprios commented that the equipment is
approximately 16 years old.
Ms. Segreto indicated that she knows the Bredesen Park comfort station was vandalized a
couple of years ago and was wondering what they are doing to safeguard the comfort
station so that it's not vandalized. Mr. Keprios responded they are doing all they can.
They have put up security surveillance cameras and have given the police a heads up to
patrol the area when they can. He indicated that by keeping the camera highly visible it
has reduced a lot of the vandalism.
Ms. Segreto asked if there are certain hours the comfort stations are open or are they open
24 hours a day, in particular Bredesen Park. Mr. Keprios replied that Bredesen is one of
the few that is open 24/7 because they do not have the keyless entry system wired into it.
He added that it would cost an additional $12,000 to make that happen plus they would
need to pay for an additional phone line. Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks they are
waiting for a renovation of the building and hope to get some fiber optics near that site so
then they can electronically lock and unlock by computer program like they do at the four
• newer shelter buildings. He explained that the rest of the shelters are locked and
unlocked manually. However, because Bredesen is so heavily used, especially really
early in the morning, they just leave it open.
Mr. Peterson asked how often the Needs Assessment Survey is done. Mr. Keprios
replied in his view it should be done no longer than 15 years apart. He noted that he
believes this past one was done about 25 years ago.
Ms. Steel asked what pathways have been added to the park system since the survey. Mr,
Keprios replied that the path at Garden Park has been added since then. He noted that
unfortunately a lot of the dollars had to be spent for upkeep and maintenance. He stated
that the next added one would be to put lights around the pathway at Lewis Park. The
new pathways they are proposing are for Countryside Park and he would eventually like
to get a hard surface path around Highlands Park, which he thinks would be heavily used.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that they also need to remember that when the Nine Mile Creek
regional trail happens there will be several millions of dollars of new trails for Edina
residents that he thinks will go a long way to serve that need.
Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED 2011-2015 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN. Louise Segreto SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
B. Park Assignments — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he and Chairman Hulbert
• recently discussed the park assignments to see if they wanted to divvy out park
assignments any differently now that there are two new student members. He noted that
they then discussed what the real purpose is for the park assignments and felt it served a
great purpose for the time that it was done. However, it seems that if a resident did come
to a Park Board member with a concern it would ultimately end up on the Park Director's
desk, which it should. Mr. Keprios indicated that in his view all Park Board members are
assigned to all parks and would like to challenge the Park Board to familiarize themselves
with all of them. He noted he would be happy to give tours of the parks if anyone was
interested. He added that he thinks by doing it this way it will eliminate another step in
the process.
The Park Board agreed that they no longer need to have park assignments. Mr. Peterson
asked Mr. Keprios if he would put in his staff report what issues residents call him about
so they have some sense of what people are concerned about.
C. Community Advisory Team Report — Member Ellen Jones — Ms. Jones noted that she
doesn't have anything to report at this time.
III. UPDATES FROM STAFF
A. Activities Directory - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Mr. MacHolda has done
a wonderful job with the Activities Directory that is now on-line. He noted that they
have put the map back in to show where all of the parks are as well as it has a matrix
showing what facilities are in each park. Mr. Keprios indicated that he is also working
with the Statewide Health Improvement Plan (SHIP) group to get a grant to create a
three -fold map that shows all of the parks and where all of the amenities are that could be
put in your pocket.
B. City Manager — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the City Council has hired a
new City Manager, Scott Neal, who is from Eden Prairie and will begin November 8th. In
addition, Interim City Manager, Heather Worthington, has accepted a position at Ramsey
County and her last day will be October 61h
IV. PARK BOARD COMMENTS
A. Hockey Boards — Mr. Hulbert asked if the new hockey rink boards are going in soon at
Pamela Park. Mr. Keprios replied yes, they are. He reminded the Park Board that the
City Council has approved the purchase and installation for lighting at both Pamela Park
and Walnut Ridge Park which are both scheduled to go in this year. He commented that
they hope to get them both done this year but if not there will still be general ice rinks
and hockey rinks regardless.
Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that there is a Joint Work Session between the City
Council and Three Rivers Park District Board of Commissioners scheduled for Wednesday,
September 29 at 7:00 p.m. at the South View Middle School Auditorium. He indicated that the
Park Board members are being asked to please attend as an observer. He stated what he thinks
might happen is eventually the Park Board is going to be asked to come up with a singular route
• recommendation for which to base a public hearing on but doesn't think they are going to be
11
asked to conduct a public hearing at a Park Board meeting. He will be asking the City Council to
decide on a process for the Park Board and City Council regarding public hearings and dates.
MEETING ADJOURNED
•
City of Edina, MN
Capital Improvement Program
2011 tbru 2015
PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
(Aquatic Center
Flowrider
AQC-03-001
n/a
600,000
600,000
1,200,000
Upgrades and Replacements
AQC-11-001
n/a
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
250,000
Aquatic Center Total
650,000
650,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
1,450,000
Arena
Replace Zamboni
A-09-002
n/a
130,000
130,000
Evaporative Condenser
A-10-002
n/a
75,000
75,000
Water System Repairs
A-10-003
n/a
60,000
60,000
Replace Zamboni
A-10-004
n/a
130,000
130,000
Parking Lot Resurfacing
A-11-001
n/a
210,000
125,000
35,000
370,000
Floor Scrubber
A-11-002
n/a
20,000
20,000
Arena Total
285,000
255,000
95,000
130,000
20,000
785,000
dmborough/Centennial
Replace HVAC Units
CL -06-005
n/a
25,000
25,000
Paint Amphitheater Structure
CL -07-003
n/a
16,000
16,000
Signage improvement
CL -07-004
n/a
20,000
20,000
Paint South Park Railings
CL -08-003
n/a
28,000
28,000
Renovate Putting Greens
CL -08-004
n/a
40,000
40,000
Replace Cracked/Broken Concrete
CL -08-005
n/a
12,000
12,000
Add Restroom Facility
CL -09-007
n/a
120,000
120,000
Replace Park Sound System
CL -09-008
n/a
32,000
32,000
Replace Concrete
CL -09-009
n/a
15,000
15,000
Floating Dock
CL -10-004
n/a
12,000
12,000
Security Camera System
CL -10-005
n/a
25,000
25,000
Centrum Planter Beds
CL -10-006
n/a
20,000
20,000
Paver Replacement
CL -11-001
n/a
20,000
20,000
40,000
New Pickup
CL -11-002
n/a
25,000
25,000
Paver Replacement
CL -11-003
n/a
20,000
20,000
Replaster Pool
EP -00-017
n/a
70,000
70,000
Replace Carpeting
EP -06-007
n/a
12,000
12,000
Adventure Peak Renovation
EP -07-006
n/a
25,000
25,000
Floor Scrubber
EP -07-007
n/a
7,000
7,000
Security Camera System
EP -08-007
n/a
12,000
12,000
Soft Play for Great Hall
EP -08-011
n/a
30,000
30,000
Pool and Wall Tile
EP -08-021
n/a
80,000
80,000
Outdoor Storage Shed
EP -09-013
n/a
15,000
15,000
Lift to Birthday Party Area
EP -09-014
n/a
30,000
30,000
Track Floor
EP -09-015
n/a
60,000
60,000
'arking Ramp Concrete & Drain Tile
EP -09-016
n/a
28,000
28,000
Adventure Peak Remodel
EP -09-021
n/a
25,000
25,000
West Sidewalk Replacement
EP -10-010
n/a
25,000
25,000
North Sidewalk
EP -10-011
n/a
30,000
30,000
Page I
Department Project# Priority 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total
Admissions Station
EP -11-001
n/a
50,000
50,000
'I pper Level Planter Removal
EP -11-002
n/a
20,000
20,000
3reat Hall Wall Matting
EP -11-003
n/a
10,000
10,000
Concession Stand
EP -11-004
n/a
45,000
45,000
Track Air Conditioning
EP -11-005
n/a
60,000
60,000
Adventure Peak Wave Slide
EP -11-006
n/a
20,000
20,000
Exterior Entryway Doors
EP -11-007
n/a
80,000
80,000
Interior Entryway Doors
EP -11-008
n/a
60,000
60,000
Upstairs Restroom Remodel
EP -11-009
n/a
25,000
25,000
Adventure Peak Renovation
EP -11-010
n/a
20,000
20,000
Edinborough/Centennial Total
291,000
397,000
232,000
207,000
162,000
1,289,000
Golf Course
Braemar & Braemar Exec: Parking Lot Resurfacing
GC -06-001
n/a
100,000
100,000
Braemar: Maintenance Equipment
GC -11-001
n/a
125,000
135,000
145,000
155,000
155,000
715,000
Braemar: Miscellaneous Equipment
GC -11-002
n/a
45,000
40,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
235,000
Golf Dome: Building Replacement
GC -11-003
n/a
460,000
460,000
Golf Course Total
270,000
635,000
195,000
205,000
205,000
1,510,000
GRAND TOTAL
1,496,000
1,937,000
572,000
592,000
437,000
5,034,000
Pale 2
4'91N��j\
o� e
N� y0
�y a�oeircw� .�
PROPOSED 2011 PARK AND RECREATION FEES
City Of Edina
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following 2011 Park
and Recreation Fees.
City Hall Park and Recreation Department 952-826-0367
4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952-826-0385
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424-1394 www.cityofedina.com
TTY 952-826-0379
PARK AND RECREATION
2010
$35.00
2011
$35.00
-Playground
Adult Tennis Instruction
$50.00
$50.00
Youth Tennis Instruction
$50.00
$50.00
Pee Wee Tennis
$36.00
$36.00
Team Tennis
$92.00
$100.00
Tennis Cam
$99.00
$99.00
Fab 4 & 5
$77.00
$77.00
Small Wonders
$67.00
$67.00
Cam
$32.00
$32.00
-Safety
Super 6 & 7
$50.00
$50.00
Cam
$50.00
$50.00
-Cheerleading
Fishing Clinic
$10.00
$10.00
Highlands Explorers
$57.00
$57.00
Challengers
$92.00
$92.00
Travelin' Teens
$92.00
$92.00
Sweetheart Dance
$47.00/Couple
NA
Family Open Gym
$3.00
NA
Winter Break Camp
$47.00
NA
Playground Plus
$17.00
$17.00
Barnyard Boogie
$4.00/per person
$4,00/per person
Sk hawks (Mini Hawks)
$101.00
$101.00
Soccer Camp Sk hawks
$49.00
$49.00
Basketball Camp Sk hawks
$105.00
$105.00
Gin Weidenfeller Classes
$35.00
$35.00
Reach Education Solutions
Pre -School Programs
NA
$75.00
Pre -School Week Workshops/Camps NA
$35.00
Age 7 - 11 Camps
NA
$65.00
Hip Hop Classes
NA
$46.00
Family Classes
NA
$40.00/ air
Once Upon a Star Parties
Cinderella's Princess Ball
NA
$26.00/couple
Grandma & Me Day
NA
$19.00/couple
Mom & Me Spa Day
NA
$25.00/couple
Springtime Tea Party
NA
$19.00/couple
City Hall Park and Recreation Department 952-826-0367
4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952-826-0385
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424-1394 www.cityofedina.com
TTY 952-826-0379
ADULT ATHLETIC FEES
SUMMER SOFTBALL LEAGUES
BASKETBALL
2010
$425.00
2011
$425.00
5 -Man C League
2010 2011
$500.00 $500.00
Men's Resident Team
Men's Non -Resident Team
$585.00
$585.00
5 -Man B League
$500.00 $500.00
Co-ReC Resident Team
$460.00
$460.00
HOCKEY
Co-ReC Non -Resident Team
$620.00
$620.00
4 -Man League $250.00 $250.00
Men's Double Header
Resident Team
$665.00
$665.00
BROOMBALL
Men's Double Header
Non -Resident Team
$825.00
$825.00
Co-Rec League
$300.00
$300.00
Non -Resident Individual
u to 4 players)
$26.00
$26.00
CO-REC KICKBALL
VOLLEYBALL
Co-Rec Kickball $125.00 $125.00
Officiated Leagues
$345.00
$345.00
1 $10.00
Non -Resident (Individual)
$10.00
$10.00
$8.00
1 $8.00
Early Bird Special if purchased no later than April 30, 2011.
Prices DO NOT include tax.
AQUATIC CENTER
2010
2011
Season Tickets
Resident Family:
First 2 members
*$85.00/$95.00
*$85.00/$95.00
Each additional member
$45.00
$45.00
Maximum 8 members
$365.00
$365.00
Resident Individual
*45.00/$50.00
*45.00/$50.00
Non -Resident Family:
First 2 members
*$100.00/$110.00
*$100.00/$110.00
Each addition al member
$50.00
$50.00
Maximum 8 members
$410.00
$410.00
Non -Resident Individual
$55.00/$60.00
$55.00/$60.00
Daily Admissions
Daily Admission (resident & non-resident)
1 $10.00
$10.00
Admission after 6 pm
1
$8.00
1 $8.00
Aquatic Instruction
Aquatic Instruction
I Contracted
Contracted
Early Bird Special if purchased no later than April 30, 2011.
Prices DO NOT include tax.
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
2010 2011
Green Fees
18 hole - non -patron
$37.00
$37.00
18 hole - patron
$29.00
$29.00
9 hole - non -patron
$19.00
$19.00
9 hole - patron
$15.00
$15.00
Masters Senior (Patrons age 75 and over)
$24.00
$24.00
College Age Rate
$25.00
$25.00
Junior 18 Hole Rate
$18.00
$18.00
Junior 9 Hole Rate
$10.00
$10.00
GROUP FEES - 18 holes
GROUP FEES - 9 holes
$46.00
$22.00
$46.00
$22.00
Patron Cards (Before April 1)
Individual
$70.00 $70.00
Non -Resident Parton Card
$110.00 $90.00
Patron Cards (After March 31)
Individual $75.00 $75.00
Computerized Handicaps
Resident
$23.00
$23.00
Non -Resident
$28.00
$28.00
Lockers
Men's 72 inch $40.00 $40.00
Men's 42 inch $30.00 $30.00
Ladies 72 inch $20.00 $20.00
Club Storage $50.00 $50.00
Club Rental $8.50 $8.50
Pull Carts $3.00 $3.00
Push Carts - 9 Hole $3.00 $3.00
Push Carts - 18 Hole $5.00 $5.00
Golf Cars
18 holes $30.00 $30.00
9 holes $18.00 $18.00
18 holes/person with disability/s I rider $16.00 $16.00
Group Car Fees $36.00 $36.00
Group Golf Lessons
Adult $99.00
$99.00
Junior $46.00
$46.00
Braemar Room
Resident - wedding related $900.00
$900.00
Non-residents - weddin related $1,000.00
$1,000.00
Other events
$350.00/$1,000.00 $350.00/$1,000.00
Braemar Driving Range
Large Bucket $7.50 $7.50
Small Bucket
$5.00 $5.00
Warm -Up Bucket
$3.00 $3.00
BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE AND FRED RICHARDS COURSE
GREENS FEES
GOLF DOME
2010
2011
Adult non -patron
$14.00
$14.00
Adult patron
$11.00
$11.00
Junior
$9.50
$9.00
Junior — 10 Round Card
$70.00
$70.00
Golf Cars (everyone)
$14.00
$14.00
Pull Carts
$2.50
$2.50
Group Fees
$16.00
$16.00
BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE AND FRED RICHARDS COURSE
PATRON CARDS
Adults Only (18 and older) $25.00 $25.00
GOLF DOME
Large Bucket
$7.50
$7.50
Senior Bucket
$7.00
$7.00
Time Golf 1/2 hour
$10.50
$10.50
Hourly Field Rental
$130.00
$130.00
EDINBOROUGH PARK "PLAYPARK"
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2010
2010
2011
Playpark Daily Admission
"Pool & Track" Dail Py asses
Resident
_
Pool & Track Daily Passes
l
$6.00 residents &
non-residents
$6.00 residents &
non-residents
$6.00
"Pool & Track" Season Passes
_
Edina Individual
$260.00
$260.00
Each Additional Member $90.00
$90.00
Non -Edina Individual
$290.00
$290.00
Each Additional Member $100.00
$100.00
Locker Rental
L $0.25
$0.25
Non-resident
Birthday Party Packages/2 Hours
$50.00
Adventure Package
Peak Package
$125.00
$75.00
$130.00
$80.00
First Member
BUILDING RENTALS
$85.00
Exclusive
Rental Non -Exclusive Rentals/Hr
$65.00
2010 1 2011
Non -Resident Season Pass
2010 2011
Friday Evening
NA NA Great Hall
$110.00
$350.00 $350.00
SaturdayEveningNA
NA Theater
$250.00 $250.00
Prom
NA NA Grotto
$10.00
$200.00 $200.00
Non-resident
Adventure Peak
$10.00
$300.00 $300.00
Pool (swim team only)
$30.00 $30.00
Commercial Photo_
Shoot(Hourly) Domestic Photo Shoot our
Any Park Area
Blocked Off
$250.00 $250.00 Any Park Area
Blocked Off
$200.00 $200.00
Grotto
$250.00 $250.00 Grotto
$200.00 $200.00
Theatre
$250.00 $250.00 Theatre
$200.00 $200.00
Great Hall
$350.00 $350.00 1 Great Hall
$350.00 $350.00
EDINBOROUGH PARK "PLAYPARK"
2010
2011
Playpark Daily Admission
Resident
$6.00
$6.00
Non-resident
$6.00
$6.00
Children Under 12 Months
FREE
FREE
Adults
Free w/ paid child
Free w/ paid child
Edinborou h Association Members Daily Pass $6.00 1
$6.00
Pla park Punch Pass -10 Uses
Resident
$50.00
$50.00
Non-resident
$50.00
$50.00
Resident Season Pass
First Member
$85.00
$85.00
Each Additional Member
$65.00
$65.00
Non -Resident Season Pass
First Member
$110.00
$110.00
Each Additional Member
$90.00
$90.00
Total Facilit Dail Admission
Resident
$10.00
$10.00
Non-resident
$10.00
$10.00
CENTENNIAL LAKES
2010
2011
2010
2011
Rental Concession Items
Open skating Youth and Adult $4.00
Weekend Rental - 6:00 pm - Midni ht
Paddle Boats
$2.00
$2.00
Friday evening $995.00
$995.00
4 person boat'/ hr
$7.00
$8.00
Saturday evening $995.00
$995.00
Winter sled per hr
$7.00
$7.00
_
$110.00
$110.00
Ice Skate
$5.00
$5.00
Maximum 7persons)
$160.00
Building
Rentals
$100.00
Champion Putting
Non -Resident Family:
'/2 da - Salon M-TH
$225.00:1:$225.00
First 2 members
9 hole
$5.00
$5.00
Sunday -'/2 day Salon $350.00
Amphitheater Rental
$350.00
18 hole
$8.00
$8.00
Lawn Games
$110.00
Amphitheater Rental
$250.00
$250.00
Per Court
$15.00/hr
$16.00/hr
Commercial Photo
Shoot
$50.00/hr
$50.00/hr
ARENA
2010
2011
Hourly Rate (as of 9/11)
$185.00
$190.00
Open skating Youth and Adult $4.00
$4.00
Skate Rental
$2.00
$2.00
Skate Sharpening
$4.00
$4.00
Season Ticketsset first week of September)
Resident Family:
First 2 members
_
$110.00
$110.00
Each additional member
$10.00
$10.00
Maximum 7persons)
$160.00
$160.00
Resident Individual
$100.00
$100.00
Non -Resident Family:
First 2 members
$125.00
$125.00
Each additional member
$10.00
$10.00
Maximum 7persons)
$175.00
$175.00
Non -Resident Individual
$110.00
$110.00
Classes
Classes
$118.00
$118.00
PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS
2010
2011
2010
2011
General Park AreasAthletic
Resident Use/hour $48.00
Resident Use/day $137.00
$48.00
$137.00
Fields - Residents Only
Per field - per dam - - $137.00 $137.00
Per field -per hour $48.00 $48.00
Commercial Use (i.e. TV)/hr
$75.00
$75.00
Per field - per hour
w/li hts
$75.00
$75.00
Commercial use with
light/hr
$130.00
$130.00
Showmobile/day
$700.00
$700.00
Edina Athletic Associations
Van Valkenburg/Courtney Fields
(Residents Only)
Field user fee/participant
$9.00
$9.00
Gymnasium user
fee/participant
$9.00
$9.00
Per field/day includes
building
$160.00
$160.00
Outdoor hockey rink user
fee/participant
$9.00
$9.00
Rosland Park Pathwa
Per Hour $55.00
$55.00
Utley Park Fire Rin Rental
Fire Ring_ per day I $26.00_ T-_
$26.00_
Per Day
$210.00
$210.00
Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only
Residents
Per hour, first hour $65.00 $65.00
Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room Only
Non -Residents
Per hour, first hour $78.00 $78.00
Each additional hour up to
3 hours
$40.00
$40.00
Each additional hour up
to 3 hours
$48.00
$48.00
Per day (4 hours or more)
$185.00
$185.00
Per day (4 hours or
more
$222.00
$222.00
Arneson Acres Park/Gazebo Only
Residents
Yz da 6 hrs or less $65.00 $65.00
Arneson Acres Park/Gazebo Only
Non -Residents
'/z da 6 hrs or less $78.00 $78.00
Full da over 6 hours $100.00
$100.00
Full da over 6 hours $120.00
$120.00
Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo Arneson Acres Park/Terrace Room & Gazebo:
Residentsl Non -Residents
Per da (4 hours or more) $200.00
$200.00
Per day (4 hours or more)
$240.00
$240.00
Per hour, first hour $100.00
$100.00
Per hour, first hour
$120.00
$120.00
Each add'I hour up to 3 hrs $40.00
$40.00
Each add'I hour up to 3
hours
$48.00
$48.00
-
Picnic Shelter Rentals full da
Picnic Shelter Rentals half -da
Chowen Park $42.00
$42.00
Chowen Park $26.00
$26.00
Sherwood Park $42.00
$42.00
Sherwood Park $26.00
$26.00
Wooddale Park $42.00
$42.00
Wooddale Park $26.00
$26.00
Rosland Park $150.00
$150.00
Braemar Park $42.00 $42.00
Park Shelter Buildings Rentals full day)
Park Shelter Buildin s Rentals (half
Cornelia School Park $65.00
-days
$65.00
Cornelia School Park $100.00 $100.00
Todd Park $100.00
$100.00
Todd Park $65.00
$65.00
Walnut Ridge Park $100.00
$100.00
Walnut Ridge Park $65.00
$65.00
Weber Park $100.00
$100.00
1 Weber Park $65.00
$65.00
11 EDINA SENIOR CENTER II
Fees
Golf League Membership (Richards Golf Course)
55+ Softball League Membership Van Valkenbur
Bowling League Membership
Edina Senior Center Membership
Greeting Cards
Trips & Tours
Defensive Driving
Elder Learning Institute Classes
Card Tournaments
Social Card Groups
Podiatrist
Community Education
Fireside Room & Classrooms p
Fireside Room & Classrooms p
Gathering/GRANDVIEW Room
Gathering/GRANDVIEW Room
Wall Art Display Rental
Room Rental
r hour - minimum 2 hours
r day
)er hour - minimum 2 hrs.
)er day
2010
$10.00
$35.00
$10.00
$17.00/$27.00
$1.50
$2.50
$22.00 4 hr.
class
NA
$18.00
$1.00/person
$.25 per person
per day
$2.00/Patient
$2.00/person
per class per day
$42.90
$150.20
$53.60
$203.80
15% of sale
2011
$12.00
$35.00
$10.00
$17.00/$27.00
$1.50
$2.50
$22.00 4 hr.
class
NA
$18.00
$1.00/person
$.25 per person
per day
$2.00/Patient
$2.00/person
per class per day
$42.90
$150.20
$53.60
$203.80
15% of sale
Equipment Rental
Television/VCR/DVD $10.70 $10.70
Overhead Projector $5.40 $5.40
Portable Screen $5.40 $5.40
CL
��
V (z c ca
Q) .. L.. (n 4-1c
ry V)
0 0- p
-0 E O ru
o .- _0
C: (1) � �, 3:4- J M E o Ul o
o
W ru ra O O 4-J
a. C (�
ru a-) 'C
W WC: C: L5, �
r4) ra O 4•�-
O
LTJ O Z)U-) O
M O ),� ��
Q. —� ca rB
U 4 -JL `- n S_
o
Q) wa-' cin n
4-1 E -o I U O
Z) L °)o � LES
o .- w
_0 ro"o C:
0 0
0 U
N •
—04 3 U 0 0 0 0 0 �� � ��v 0— W o+1 c
��
L 'U
O �_ U) U—`1----� v
v* -Qv �.� �0� a� " °*' p tin
v -c-, K D T — U) (Z (L) CF) [U (f) — a U} } U
Co (13 CU
�- r v. O} _� o O 7
cn� ca Ou �Q-C; 00 c— —
N
�c 7D
_C) ILI
3
� o ,
z
8 -
CD
0
CEII
0
0
Q0
O
0
0
a a Z
a rL
OP
�
U
ca
i
W
4
a
V
0
d
N
4-0
K
d3
a
�
v
V
d
V
Q3
�'
ILL
a a Z
a rL
OP
�
a)
ca
i
W
ui
a
V
0
d
N
4-0
K
0
0
I-
CD o -
co
0
}
o
0 ❑
0
0
0
0
co
I
N
73
mm r
5,-0.0 d Q) a-- -F-- Q) �CB fLT r 4) M M U} C6
d 0 d
70. � o d v)
X70- _4- o c� -o
(13 � C_O � ca c r
Ui m � {fid � 0 7U — —
m M 7E
Ou o
[� CO v d N
�a
C) 0
o (13
o o 0
-c;0 0
�z 70 -0
�
a)
a
Vi
C
a
L
�
v
V
s
0
0
I-
CD o -
co
0
}
o
0 ❑
0
0
0
0
co
I
N
73
mm r
5,-0.0 d Q) a-- -F-- Q) �CB fLT r 4) M M U} C6
d 0 d
70. � o d v)
X70- _4- o c� -o
(13 � C_O � ca c r
Ui m � {fid � 0 7U — —
m M 7E
Ou o
[� CO v d N
�a
C) 0
o (13
o o 0
-c;0 0
�z 70 -0
cvl
(D
o
0
d-�
J
M
co
00
--------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------
Q3
X
LU
7:3
--------------------------------------------------------
J
7D
LO
CA
o
r
o
3
r`
cvl
(D
o
0
In
W
J
M
Q3
X
LU
7:3
O
_
~
J
7D
o
cu
W
O
z
0
C)
a
s
0)
0 L
0
am
77D x
A� F-
rW
o �
_ ,o
.o
WMa
� Q
o
CL•—
V} S
W �
UL
o
c
I
CA N 47 6?
--------------------------------`---------------
nnF-----1
v
Cu
v
U
q}
FD
❑
_
"-
o
>
v
❑
0
a—
L`
'
V)
v
m
-
a
K
Q
�
K
�
❑
o
v
w
v
a�
Q
O
0
c0
0
N
0
a
0
s�
cn O
QO E :3 ._
U -� 4-J � m
Z a . C: a�
4-J -0
W W .>
O (1) F= ca V
0->
V �.
Q� O p V V
�— V u O E 4�
4 -JV) cl C) Ofu L
.o O V O
O
4O O
E _ >
Cl)
0 4-JC:cn ca
(!)�, O 4J L
4� U 4-J ..O ruL
p E n .V 4
�
Q C: a, O ._
p ■�a��� 4-cn V
■_ V w ,^ E
4. -JV I
-1--� a--� — 4�
Ln
p .�, _ co o, E
>C- Q 'C3 'gin
EO w° O o (1) Q
E o t'1 0
E
O O U Q U
p U oC U
U
w
•
V)
Q)
V
L-
D D
O
•
6-7
i
O
Z3
fu
4-J
4�
E
u
O
.U)
O
L
4-
O
L
L
4--J
fo
►i
V
4-
m
ri'
•
ro
L �
V)O
a --J 4-j
V V
(u L
E uo)
O
(� V
4J �
r 4 cn
O
fo
> -C
0 -
ca O
4.) • —
U)
L-
O
4-J O
O 0 -
CL .— O
I
O
.�
�J
Vl
O
W
4J
C
A
E
L
O
E
OO
O
�.
(1)
V
O
4-'
O
4�
C:
U.
(1)
v
O
0-
EE
m
m
-
4�
cu
ca
>
F---
0
■ -
.-
_
O`-
ru
W
4-
>
O
.C—
-0
O
>
. -
LU
>.
ca
V
�
O
4-J
.-
-O
.—
Q
U
I
U
j5
r
N4,4
L �
� N
4 d" L.
O a -J
(y) ru
Cn Lr) c
c 0)
U O 4-J cu '(n
U N 00
C: O O 00
L. U 4-J
L � � cn '� � cn
4) 4) (A 0) O L
a --J a L 0 L Q)
4"J (n O- U O
c 4-J
O O v U
U U p U
U)^ O O L
.— —
(� N L v ra
cn cn L
� N �
10 C:=3 C=n C:
• — O 4-J O 4-J O
E E Ew ca r
L- 4-J 0& C 4--J
Lf) O O O 4 4� N .— 4) .2) Q)
4. LL LL . _ Q, CL m a. in a.
T --j N I I M I I I
ro
I
0
r -)
G
Z
o
0
00
00
O
N
�J
0
0
M
M
fr)
m
p
m
0
0
0
0
41
a
a
L
44
J
N
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
0
0
0
r
0
LL
L
—�
f\
f-
a1
fV
O
m
G'J
7f
'#
O
N
� f4
r
W
[ll
o
°i
0
0
0
.�
4-J
Q V
(ll
RT
=
4J
4,
aLi
0 a)
.a.,
0_4
J--►
'—
1.J
-0
_
.-
0a
-
a+ N
u
4�
41
fG
4
C7
a
O
I
0
V)
c
LL-
L
L
L
j
C. 0
�{�-
_
Z3
o
-
v
CL
•
n
D
_
o
C
G
L
o
cU
o
+�
E
�►
�,
g
tll
t�L
a�
0
cu
y,►
L
L=
.3
o
C
N
0
q1
0
0
'C
•i
o
r
0
LAi
W?
WCLU
W
W
,�
CL
0
cn
O
a
.
11w11PU01baa A4,aa;ul
v � �
ji
jl
Y O —
—1Y DZF-
�
0
L C —
(O O m C 10
d
0) C 1v N O
�C
+-+O��i�w=
L
4--%
C
U)
v 1°n C-0
o Cmc
O
•CD
mU
OC O
U
0
-a q
r
C
A
a
ja
Q)
C
O
V1
J5
•�
an
0 0 7 C) N
U
x
CC)
11 O' 10 O
OJ
L
O
U
C y
Oa--)
c
N
oc=o0
U R
L
C
4-J
0
:3
O
a -J
V)
L—•�
M
O
C
C
W
Y
4-J
4-•J
U)
0
0
cc
4-J
rW
O
0
U
a,
�
�x
o
W
Z
Z
\
U
C
.
.
11w11PU01baa A4,aa;ul
C,y
O 'o7 O�
L O N C 0)
OJ N E U
C C� O
C C_ O O
V •-
o5
k
v � �
ji
jl
Y O —
—1Y DZF-
�
0
L C —
(O O m C 10
d
0) C 1v N O
�C
+-+O��i�w=
L
4--%
C
U)
v 1°n C-0
o Cmc
mU
OC O
U
0
-a q
r
C
A
a
ja
P
m JlTgaLW
3
u
w
J5
m
L
a
x
C,y
O 'o7 O�
L O N C 0)
OJ N E U
C C� O
C C_ O O
V •-
o5
k
ji
jl
0
U
L
4--%
U)
0
0)
a--)
U
0
m
L
a
Oa--)
-J
fu
L
4-J
0
:3
O
a -J
V)
L
W
Y
4-J
4-•J
U)
U
J
4-J
rW
O
0
U
a,
�
o
N
c6.2
\
U
C:
.
0
C—
N
0
=
o
0
�
z Q
oCOD
U
c
cu to
O
c
•C6
co
co
L
�
Cc:
c
a
O
LN
Y
Y
r°a
W
z
z
QjJ t
,C0
m ro w z i
J Y 3 F-
r`o om = io
+-+i f0 C
aJ N y N O Y
C a
� 2: F - W _
vY0�o- E
'i cJ c�aj
`U
� ACC J
� 5
ti
O
G
G
u m
PD a $,
upj1 reuoibaa pUlaml
43C L
O y 5 01
O G1 C N
v d ff U
C C4? O
C C •- O O
v?
C-
O
a -J
U
'D1
O�
� L
O L
U
L �
a -J
Ul
(n
O U
U
L L
N �
-v (n
c _
Z3 fo
^� E
W
> O
<L -
_r_
• >
4-J
N LU
0.0
a o
x U
X fu
0 O
0-
T O
.� 4-J
U �
Ilwt Ipua!6ab Alpjalul
'0
w
t
w
•�
Ln
Z Q
Ln
�
cc�
a o W '� v
-
c c p s-
C c !t-- 0
0
is
o �
•L
W
E
O
•c
Q
4-
0
Q�
c
0
1n
(�
Cfo
G
U
O
O
.�1
E
y
O 3
U nO Y E
0
o
U
.E
C
o
N Cr (I p
c �Y
�'
U
c o �, O
O .— m
-{-�
Ul
�
U
O
z
Q
_
.O
ca
CL
0
�
co
co
L
(�o
c
c
a'
'
0
0
.0
�O
ami
ami
f u
L
N
_X
.x
L
J
>
yYz
fu
=a
U
U
O
O
0)
_
FA
c
c
• E
w
Z
Z
L
MM0
L
I
I
Ilwt Ipua!6ab Alpjalul
'0
w
t
w
Ln
0. o
2 c
0 a '
Ln
�
cc�
a o W '� v
-
c c p s-
C c !t-- 0
0
is
o �
•L
W
E
Q
4-
0
Cfo
G
rn
O
E
a --j
0
o
.E
O
O
z
T -i
0
�
N
fu
.0
�O
T
U
f u
• v
`
L
J
>
yYz
fu
=a
0)
O
O
0)
c
• E
0
MM0
L
a-
04-
0-0
J
li
W
�
• O
N
E
Ul)
.fu
Z
F—
fu
c
O
.0
Q)
C
o
v
u
�
O
Ul)
ca
.Y
L
cc
~
t-
c
t=
c
(d
o
m
O
N
O
ami
L
N
Y
Y
c'
Q)'X
W
Z
Z
I
'-
F—
0
o ! 'oLn
u aoY _
E
N ce m O
CJ Y
C 'O
C o
O C C m Z
ca
Ug� �
O
Q
c
c
c
LA
n
m `'
rs a p
v i
c �n
11
I!Pjl leuoi6ab Ag»a,lut
v-
CD
v
L
Q) c
o rn o a;
i�° ocn C
o W _C N
N cu E U
C C W O t -
C C �— _O y0�
U�
c
c
b
O
C3
_0 0
W
•E
^L,
W
—J
W
O
4—J
^ L
i..L
V
�O
A
1 > m
s
- p -_— S 3AV S4fCa3% f-- L--' S 3AV S3%a3%.W._v_._.�,,.
and HaOA .Cd. p L.
�W
_ u s 3AV IaoA
s
and Hl)N3Z
m
N
3AV HOBBY c a 7
x
w S and ONY39 x u :,.
s +, -.,...s,,.._ Odb.
3: •.....». 3 ._._. m , S 3AV N3MOI0 O
S 3AV M390
��' K ».,.._._......... S and OtdIM
IA)
3Ii 6 = n D
WALIFA%LN �'* • _ 3AV 1130NV9 "I.
5 3ntl %d371VH
3nY 37Y030V3d
QA 9 1015ta9
i- { a111aj ,a ~b'l"�"H•—_, ... aa a0 g3
wn i > 54Dno 3Cii C
caE� a0 a31saH,)no-,N -71 — d
3AV 3LOa9 3AV M31A%OO9 * 3'"
r7YL S3Atl NMtl7%VO �. Hmd
YYC
3AV 000113A 3Atl D70173M 1 C 3 iI xo o '— I 1p in cn
.3nr 31Y000OM -+-^-- --I 3 z yc c mOO
� C O
C G C N
o°
3'AV .UOaiHSY a.,
do 5 1. 3 m 3AV OV 00NW N- Oaf
WEST S�
3AV j 1fidWOJ _
w .....--w. 5 3 O .- 3Atl TUNatld3AV ?53Nadd p
S.+S, 3AV NYAII= .. 3Atl NVAV _ --- Oa ANd11INB '
3AV 000MU3145 s y .. t1 Y ! • d..L
Qa N05O77IM . ac.
Oa31YONdWaON
3AV 3NIHa3SC1 y .. and 3NIHd350C •� ..�- s } J L' "✓
O .,(3 _. 3Atl NVAa7IM F ,....f- b�''�"A i
_ .. 3AV 31Y09Nll y,+ b yea+ OA7g Oa13Y1 x
3 . 3AV d1Oa - -14 A3NN W44� 11 Q o3:.--�-^-'-' ;
'O N - 3AV 3007 JU a '!"� ¢ O `H ,-' 3. [
..._
....a. 2' \T N
3AV N3aaVM ,_._',. ,2• `r: v
7d aaaNae9 W
> ? mho a°
_. and 31V(3z �_ og} 3: °: a oa 3XV1 Hsng
^- Oa^N3SNVH O t CK pR
a
OIdIOVd
YNYNYIO N I
'.: N -� t0 _ •• _, - +0..
P
- . 'Wo as w 1rt3os3a7 � � � � °'�n .._.._. Oa AIN»
U.
=3
'
Nl ai W
°� � E � > `" ._..�... NILLSIDEL � ( .. __.
db13 NOSNNLf � } C��l' CECILIA
Oa Badly OELA a313a3WH001 O
._._.. = F• .e_.�. < a � z
o N ? 4� 0` j m F o b ao aoo�,I,
O n \ G �', a �,-fi'"` _". ON OR
O
Hlaa'W
t7 � .. !@ Q `F •YiRIM RD ,..._ +.�,...-. � ---•" i....._ � - —••} L�
saLnW & V
r..
h•- __. Oa a3'7NP0 __.,iy bi�N iii a s b {� sl...../ p0
■
F •
co
; iv.,. W .,,� "PIE"
0 ram
S w _
„�2QJIpP vs.'1X'!.4,
•..3,.n. `C. �T ILN
*
`$aO 7-{ 10y�.yy.. DqP•_. ti ;. <"��
9�m
JS oa 3Y190Fv
d" N N1 MRA lal 3bo 3�{n a,
K07ATIa
V\
-Tt
fy � y
a.LNIVM )IM73
U -)F7
j 0 Oc 3
ar
3 N
o- I,G . In
CI n C1 70
m c W
O
5 0 # o rr 01 L f1_
s F o V L
ca a
as aNd13PlS $ O '` _ A'
03��... �NAD3 OAK ^D ..., ; — O E
y_ C
46
� 01 fit•
Lo
041
CLLU �IV
C1 —
i cu
�,,. N " � O Q O U ■� .:-J
_
U)
c
O
fu
L
U)
c
O
U
U)
fu O
V
V_ C-
- O•-
4� 4-J
E 4 D
O O -� \ 4-J
4-J E O E O
O L U
V Lf) L-
O V) • —
.� (n -0 � fu _0 (n ro
E 4-J
L
cn `� o cn o '0' V)i,
0 4-Q \ L Q L-
V)
V) L w V fu
m O V � '- •-
Q c V �_ E E
fu
E 4-1 >fu
.4�
T :3 Lr) >
_ 0—
U z o u o Q 0
O I I i I V I
(f)�-- uj
VJ
o
U
v
0
c�
o
Zo
a�
.rte^
V J
CC
o
�
U
�
z
a
o
U
v
�
o
W
Zo
CC
z
z
z
QQQ
(n
Q Q O
O
L
O
—
�-- (a) O O
p0 -1O0
ca
c
O
a
(a)O-
Q I'D O� d'
U)
-O
Vf
T-
4-)
L
L-
ru
O
a.J 4-J 4-J
O O O
ro
OL
L
LL2:
OO
L.
-a
CD
v o0ouO
u
(
U
0
L� Q
u
3-wC
@)
M
uM
N
M
N
N
N N d' N
N
0
�--�
•--�
•
•
•
• • • •
•
•
•
•
I- F- o
<QQ
fu
QQa
o
oc
�,
LO
Ln an
rn00
I- m 0 0
O O O
ro
O
4-J
O
L
=
D_
O
O a -J a -J 4-)_0
0 0 0 ,�
(10L
L
L
L
O
L
f
u
-O
2:"1-
C) 0 0 0
X000
0
0
u
C�
-
-
L-
ru
O
O
M
M
V ll') (� Q1
_
�Q
N
=
E>
O
u
Ou
.
m
Q
N
m
N
N N M
Ln
•
•
•
• • • •
•
•
•
•
V)
V
4-
O
O
4-J
(U
O u O
fa
OV
�(
�
ro
U
-0
u
u
O
CC
C-0
0_0
f0
a)
4J
Ul
�0
71 L
QD
(n
L
> 0
Q-0 L
U-
(p
u
OL
L-
u
4)
p�\
oz;
n�
W
V 1
r�
E
O
4�
U
F---
<
U
L-
4)
V
W
m
4)
z
O
Z
O
�-+
(o U
3
O L
(1)V)
L �
O
07 U
m
L
00 L
•
O
(0 V
Q
.o
C
O
L
�
L
Q�
0
�
V
�
�
•
0
0
:-
V
0)
4 j
N
Q
N
O
.�.�
0-0
m
Q
m
CL
Q
Ln
4�
C:
E
O
0
•—
s
ca
.�
4�
4�
•�
V
•—
LO
m
O
m
U
`'~
0
Q
U
E
�>11o
�
a
Q
Q
Q
z
z
z
0
z
0
ce
�a
Q)
E
wo
ir►
00
.J
w
ami
Ul
E
C
L
V
®
.
•
E_
E
O
r�
O
o
C
Ln
.—
GJ(1)
O
Q)
00>
L
V
'gyp
U
a--)
U a -J
s-
>
O
>
o
D
o
O
Q
.Ln
-a=
Q
.Ln
-a=
Z:
r-
41--
V J
o
IOU
.�
�J
L
m
W
m
4w
V 1
O
■�
�
U
�
L
r
U
W
z
V
m
m
3
�
z
z
O
z
o
c-
a)
U
-0
(nfu
-a
.-0�
(6
j.
M
j.
ru
fa
Z)
1
N
U
4-J
C
O
'O
41
O4-
V)
�O
-
-0
N
191-
00
N
I
N
M
m
00
L
.N
3
�
O
U
-0
Mo
_0
L
(n
.�
f0
L
-0
fa
'a
ru
�C
O
10
O
N
a�
L-
—�
�'_0
G)
4-
M
.
L
I�
lO
rI
(3)
.-i
.-i
N
N
O
ra
�4-J
�
c
Q)
Q
U
�_
•
0
L
V
0 3
Q
0
z
z
3
V)
a,
'L
>
•L.
E
ul
r�
S
c
tn
�
�
0
C:
.�
V
•(lei
L
Q)
>
'L
0
V
V1
E�
_
>
0
>
6—
-0
>
�
O
V
L
m
fa
1
(!1
1
(1)
L
>
L
to
>
.m
'L
LL
Ln
(A
E
�
0
>_
•�
CC
C
_0
0
M
0
'L
0
O
N
UN
U0)-
V
V
(B
f�
(u
L
a)
Q)
E
Ln
Q)
>
�
Ln
�0/
ii
_,
L 0
00)
>
Cn
Ln
'Q
V
'(
L
>
'L
O
w
�A
>-
—
'E
L
>
Ln
OL
Q)
U
:Q
>O
—
>-
1
L
•ru
>u
(n
(/1
L
>,
D
L
(n
>
_
'cno00O°•Loo
Ln
V
,.�
I"-
U
U
'O
N
U
V
cYi
0
L
C
;
z -0
u
(10
rZ
O
ry
m
V
On
a
fi
4
t
(10
rZ
O
ry
m
V
On
n
a
ID
4�
V
f6
-a
E
-
�
4J
(�
X
r
O
ru
W
Q
..
O
O
•O
v)
oC
_O
_0
fu
0
4�
_0•
fa
—
O
�
0
O
�
p
O
o
.ru
ru
.0
W
■ r
ru
4J
0
ru
W
E
ru
X
W
n
0
u
CD
ro
L
0-
0
ru
L
4�
At
u
0
X
ro
a -J
L-
0-
0
c
ro
4-J
O
O
L
4-J
G
0)
O
V)
D
4 -
►a
—
V J
n�
W
4-J
L
L
� a -J
4-J
O V)
U m
O
C-
ru .- , p O
4-J-
a-' •
. - U 4-,
(1) U
I � - UP)4� O
�1 O U
0
U 4-J O
fu 0.L O (1) fu
U oC a. r
LL 0 • • 0 0
4-)
fu
-
cn
ro
a
>.
cnfu
_0
U
V
V)
ru
ccn
0)*.
-1
O
4)
�
ru
V)o
—
. -
,
0-
U
C:
-0
�fu
a,
'-
,o
C:
o
—
D
�,
1
L
CL
c
4-Jc
0
L-
• _
0
o
—
ru
ru
�
ML
U
V
4-)p
L-
o
o
on-
L
L
ru
co
_
4-'O
4-J
E
V
L
o
L
L
=3
L
fo
cn
o
L
S--
C-
0
o
a --J
ru
-0
Q)
L
M
4-JQ.
E
• C:o
L
Q.
Cl
(n
o
H
O
U
4J
0
Q
4-)
D
0
0
z
-0
o
o
ro
ru
=
o
O
oo
ru
o
�-
•�
O
ru
o
D
o
o
°°
ru
N
�
-b9-
L
U
.ru
L
-
4
p
a --J
-0
L
_
4-
C:
C:
p
ru
Cn
(1)
ru
(1)
�
-�
•0
O0)
C:ru
O
0)
U
p
(1)
ru
4-J
'�
:�
ru
•�
�-
C:t
uw
0
E
�.
a�
I; BAY �4, d�l S3XV3X
INV
VOA S BAY xdw -6 Cc
3: x 3W KIIN32 pr
-a ma
r
--n BAY 11096v
ZJ 0, -0
z
S BAY Oft3g Z noda
wvmm
cc
3: 1 S2AVINVAOHJ z
S BAY M340
S BAY DNIM3
0
AAOFAY LkBAY 113OPOIS 0- fir. q'O 4;
x 3AV XV,411vm
%,,,N RD L,
BAY 31YO3:w3d
0
]AV MMAAOC�fl BAY M31A)40CdS -
740 V113N UC):)' cc
.3AV Nffivlmvo BAY UMVIXIM 2 -V z
- t I In 1 2
BAY D'Doll3x Z! a AV EI�0-1113>1 Q
V)
BAY 31VOODOM
3 S r
'T 0
4
BAY IV.4VIv i A4
0 0 Q. a
Z
Sv
IV :.
0
v BAY aVO:)NCj - r
WEST 51,3AV Ilindwoo
L BAY TGNVWd
L, T- 3A! Oki NO_ In BAY Nyxv BAY NVAV - ON ANVIUMS -Vlf
BAY coomma"S
M -
qF4
BAY itItHi3SOC BAY 3NIH,13SOr 4,
0d31VJIJ%'Hd0N. X I � $,- -
z BAY
� 3: -Atn!m T Q
Ar J, �,, . r•- *. -T-1 I ,s l BAY 3-IYMPiLL j y !, f CIA7, OL119W
-N VW "'4,Id .314r14 Vq
V t
5:- BAY 3003 a -C 0
4— BAY Ng
14 azltNdas --^
3AV 9 ad 3XVI
0 M N3SNVH x - M -,CV, ��q -1
Vravmvi
do IN30Sqd3 ld Tlimv:)
VAC
MO "OSN"o(
741,
BAY ADVVI -
as VNVI:j,
3: A31 3d3il-01
0 NI wr,4
0 r3 0 'NO 00014.,,
-44
0
%TPIIM RD
tu
as I d39Nn0 coo
tu—
do 310
SCO;AV"M
3;
In 3
110
do intjlv,,,,
do vpIV13WS
7.5
V)
ru
mo
a
0
C
z
-N w
ea 0
I,—
W-0
QJ
1 5
0
;5
r
0
al 0
C)
0
>
� 0
u E
Z
to
(U
>
7=5
cu (V -Fu
awn
U =1
Zi c t
0
u m
V)
ru
mo
•
O
ru
cv
U
Q)
L
4--
O
L-
E E
C
L
L
J
(n
U
C
.Lo
� O
O
U C
M U
0 0)
ca C:
C: O
O c6
=ru �
L IZ-
4-
O =
�
L-
U 4-+
ro a O
��
> 'O
a -J a
ru (n
0) V)
U
_0 U
fu
> _0
.0
L E
a. J
Eel,'
>O
O
-�-J
O
(�
U
�
oLjj
O
�
N
Z3
O
V
a
.�
/1
U
�
N
Z3
ru
0
OU
�O
L-
U
_
�
-
(1)L
C-
O
Q)
—
■ ■
U
4
0
C�
C
-�
Y
O
U
O
O
Q
L
O
o
-�
�r
u
a
U)
.0
c
U
ru
01
-0
(a
U
(p
1
,�
' '
4-J
o
�-
Q
O
O
4
O
O
L
U•
•
O
ru
cv
U
Q)
L
4--
O
L-
E E
C
L
L
J
(n
U
C
.Lo
� O
O
U C
M U
0 0)
ca C:
C: O
O c6
=ru �
L IZ-
4-
O =
�
L-
U 4-+
ro a O
��
> 'O
a -J a
ru (n
0) V)
U
_0 U
fu
> _0
.0
L E
a. J
Eel,'
cc
5 RAV MaOA _.' ...._ S 3AV 53 %a3x .T_....t,.__.,.._"` , 3^ •.'s3> a3x m �
b N
N it 3Aa xelOA '_ r : O
�11 O A
�`' in r,.^..........
3AV H1IN32 ^---- a 2 A n
andito99a
i _
z N
N • ...__.._._ ..... ,.._...�. ._ .=y,.___...« a _
=,n0d09NIa3
S and Oaa39 S K . V E
1 `--3 -- SaA.N3MDH7 8- p_�
r {� z o r%j e s
5 and t43a0 '
W x m
in =S3,%'
8 -- DNIM3 D
OV Q v
w H E n� _ a
FAX LN
s 3Ad Xdd itaH 3AV 1190NV5
it r'.>
1Led' i .�'�`� `s IYNMAR
4µ----- _ 3AV 31VO33V34 t y,EE , ^�J "^ OA -19 loislo9
My tix
3AV AA IHAApOa9 x {•--.� -and M3IA>fDOa9
^^' ��k -- 0 uwJi �"- ao a3153NOnOtD a n 3 y ' ]C
.. 3AV NMf/lxd0 y {r:::' 3AV NMd1NV0$- a0 d113N MOJ ° ..-.-4 q c to d L 4
.sc c %
3AV DDOTG)l m. 3AV D?Ol'13X �t 3 " q 7 v
L --r oLL 3na 3140000% �I z c a' t ° N ^ a0 w cam+
r ro p.... �. _ O �- ry 1 . w a o
4
r �N ai 3Ad XVdafdd' 4 "-FS �`� �'w �e N � 4G�
I+.-...... = G Ll C "`•--•• 4 p p Vfp
AV I:ioe:
dd b P 6 q O
j..-.L...,d... �.-�.,---.....n - 3Aa OMOONOJ
o
09L-
3:
9L -
3
110
#+
3Aa "llldW00
3a 11aNatld v `t,
Oa ANViiIa93AV NYAa and NVAa - _3
O 3ntl OQOMa3H5 " c,
= a NOS'TW -11
r
Flo
'^"` a ""r- ..-`. ; --(-
s
$$ { ,
w a 9 W ✓ �`� ••3na 3NIHd350[ t
a W 3AY 3NIN63S0C �
i W'•r d � _ d 3AV NVA7MM
C�. N in N ((�,,.La..r-.. 1 w....._.. 3Aa 3tVOJN11 '—•5 H J l °' I OAT9 0a13W�
s ,...,. w = 1 ✓� d 1 m0 3' 3AV ilOa - Id A3NN371 , v. .y ^' o .. i ✓--'— ,.
N .�,,. .� TO • � j 3ntl 3007 -�--?
� -,. _:_ � i �. - o.�.._.•.�_._' '"^ a _. ° u r"'" o N �
1 J
M -- 3AV N3ddVM S
td adr FJd39 w m ti x m im d
€,_„_....
a0
3AV 31V0 t - l < r t3'}n7 €
c:" t o w = Ob 3x41 Hsn9 ---L--
as
'—Oa N3SNtlN .._Ea._ O ._. .. a ..,..:�• ,S .,,.,j•� ,- piCR DR `y _ ...._ ._-.-^.-,-.5,�
�
!I
i0 iIdIJVE NVIGVNV3
p WO iN3?53a0 ; '� _ ...e.. 1�..- k — !!' a_ IHVa
j ' 0 Illm
NI VAOD 4 SNNOf i .�()" E y? of t-...
9 i U. < N
„_. rrNy t� -- NSLLSIDE I
� .t�-' S 'S ',r$.•-.. `.'\ CE-ClLIA CIR
3AV AOtlal.�
advan y `DE1'
"`�^'--_.....�• ,,, a / ,._,,.'^...--- 3 W ` a y31 3d3NH>01
c � i -i, `"4 �"' Nl Wtlkyh
40
O K .J ♦ 71 •� 4 ;aT3ty W 1� O
"ON DR. Q
;^%TRIM RD-- i�� S? HiavW ■ ti
4 .
Od d3DNIl0. ✓ z b3W j'�-•..,..00 H'PL, OR
M �
za -ts Da3xVl8
ro
N1 A131A tai 334Oa3N0
�omoJ
•t.d1Tl0 - �¢ Oa " cc
Q
AKOtA TRL "�`.`•^-...-.<....
O \ u v
�.. Q 1 '. d(3IJlvm _-_ 6W c �- WAndHv,v w N
�� a lH.MPE Vt a! O
Ln
.-.... Y..— p ° s
C
trrrrrrr�
Y _..
-...w''` (1)p '
•`�,�� �_ O — ai O
.. aD VNV13WS d 1 ~ Y a
N7 J -
O; (D j OC O 07
o ( cc 00 ru
c F`� o+
^jL Y
W C
T
La,
V)
J
a--)
L
O
V
ro
O
•L
�
fu
�J
O
4-J
O
C
C
V)
ru
W
_0
�
_O
V
4-J
U
L
0
O
Q�
>
O
Q
OX
U
w
E
�fu
O
Q)
..
O
L
4-J
a--)
_0
O
4-J
C
,S�
D
>
L
V
Q
�
�
a -J
(1)
ro
L
O
0
U!)
ru
-
.fu
�-
fa
Q)
�
U
u
L
j
_
U
�
U
C
Q)
(n
�
(1) Q)
C
�
fU
0)
'
M.—
6
O
(f)V)
V)
0
•
O
4-J
Q�
U
_l
'
L
O
Q)
J
LL
O
L
O
CL
I
I
I
I
oC
•
La,
V)
J
a--)
fu
V
ro
•L
fu
_0
O
C
V)
ru
_0
�
_O
V
L
0
Q�
>
Q
OX
w
E
w-0
O
-v
_0
C
L
L
�
�
L
ru
-
.fu
L
-W
V)
L
j
_
U
�
U
f
(n
�
(1) Q)
C
fU
a --J
'
M.—
(6
O
(f)V)
V)
v
(f)
•
O
(n
O
_I
U
_l
U)
La,
V)
J
k7
L4L
N
0 C=" 1
..
+Cr o N C !
•V�
N
N
4-J
U
C
°
U
4-%
0
o
_
-6 75
NCC_]
r
S—
o
o
o
m
c
°
CL
L
°'
m
m
C
cB
W
�
U
o
�x
L
W
Z
k7
Q
0
L
0
z
L4L
N
0 C=" 1
..
+Cr o N C !
C W oC
U 0
-6 75
NCC_]
r
O
Q)
N!Q
_L
Ln
oo�
O
pel'euo6ae A3i�alul
I-
Q
0
L
0
z
0)
O
L L
a--� OD
(/)
O C: X
O .0O >u
4-1 0)a >
_0 E a)
(1) O _0•-
V) V 4� V (n
O -uO 0 0
4-J (3) _0 V
(1) (f) o
— 4—) .�.�
4) '- 0) (1)
V) v O ca '4--) V c V
_0 .� .- o
O o w
V C)- 4-J
QJ -L — N C:> 4 -JO c�
O n �O
�� ��fo
0
a- w e Q o CD
z 0 0 0
September 20, 2010
Director, Parks and Recreation
Edina CityHall
4801 West 50`'' Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Sir:
In regard to Roger Harrold's writings of August 2010, (Financing Edina's Fred Richards Golf Course) I
concur with all points he made.
I would like also to add the fact that there has been a golf course building boom in the United States
which has created stronger competition among courses to capture player business. Courses must offer
better maintained facilities and innovative services in order to draw and keep players.
To this end, Braemar's profits must go to Braemar's projects and not be drained by the debt service of
the Fred Richards Golf Course. It was so promised by the City in 1983.
Sincerely,
Awe4e;�to�
Cora Jan Blanchard
5308 Ayrshire Blvd.
Edina, MN 55436
cc: Roger Harrold
encl.
League of Women Voters
of Edina
inui&,3 nuc to a
M C, - Mil(W I
pal' 11
FOA
/
Nil F17.7 I.M. - TA�
6,&VV,-S,&VVpm
Ecluuc eit� MaU
Sine Xe�, BWVE Jw,,3idad at 952-925-9763
Iwvedina(a-Dgmail.com " Iwvedina.org
tonight's presentation
• Three Rivers Park District regional trail
system and Vision Plan
• Project overview
• Routes for review and consideration
• Requested Park Board action
• Questions and discussion
11
regional trail network
Three Rivers Trail Network
✓ 100 Miles of trails open
✓ 2,000,000+ visits annually
✓ Recreation & Transportation
✓ Connected to:
Neighborhoods
Schools
Parks
Greenways
Grand Rounds
Downtowns
meeting Three Rivers' Vision
Goal: Inspire People to Recreate
2
j
J
1"
meeting Three Rivers' Vision
Goal: Inspire People to Recreate
2
meeting Three Rivers' Vision
Goal: Connect People to Nature
meeting Three Rivers' Vision
Goal: Creating Vibrant Places
3
Nine Mile Trail as part of Three River's Vision
Vision Plan recognizes:
• Importance of regional
trails
• Importance of providing
regional recreation
facilities in the developed
cities
• Regional trails as one of
the primary Capital
projects in the 10 -year
Capital Forecast
.�Al
•
P-
mi'r}" t
f .f(
al
planning efforts in Edina
• Voluntary environmental assessment
• Public open houses
• Community Assessment Team (CAT)
• Summary of public comments
Community Assessment Team (CAT)
• Composition
• Role
- Identify the constraints and opportunities
- Provide design suggestions/considerations
- Convey information to respective neighbors
• CAT Analysis June 2010 Document
- Social, technical, and economic assessment
- Design suggestions
- CAT member narrative on respective route
5
30 -day public comment summary
Support/ Opposition
Unique
& Route Preference
Emails/Letters
Form Letters
Petition
Support Trail
97
21
20
Prefer route adjacent to creek
77
21
20
No route preference indicated
19
0
0
Prefer route adjacent to roads
1
0
0
Oppose Trail
42
0
130
Cost of trail too high
30
0
130
Environmental concerns
29
0
130
Unsafe for non -trail users
18
0
130
Priority should not be recreation trails
14
0
0
Too noisy construction, trail users
4
0
130
Position about Trail Unclear
36
0
O
If built, prefer route adjacent to creek
14
0
0
If built, prefer route adjacent to roads
10
0
0
No route preference indicated
1 12
1 0
0
�\ 1
ia.,
a
Legend
13
Creek -Based Route
------Aft.—tve Trail Routes'
00 �"
SE glternatw. Trail Route Number
.._
19-2 -
Mlles
'
Lt
—
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
N-
* Altemative hall Route Is generalized to reflect-
concep[ual trail condor and doe: not a,pi
aC-1 trail alignment
r ..ro
Creek -based option
r�
Road -based option
Example: North Cedar Lake Regional Trail
0
if,
Minnetonka
Creek -based Route
Three Rivers Park District Regional Trails
,
No Route
St. Louts
Park
Exisitn /Planned Re I Trail
9 9iona
• 34 front yards
lo"Nine
Mile Creek Regional Trail'. Construction 2010.2012 N
• 16 side yards
• 38 side yards
N/A
adjacent
• 216 back yards
miles
4opkins
n+:nneapor�> Connect to
Minneapolis
• 243 total adjacent
• 147 total adjacent
Grand Rounds
residential yards
at Lake
�.
Nokomis
...
�
��
nai�s a,n
� MI"eepoll5/
Airportpari
A
Connect to
rra�r,aMinnesota
Wildlife Refuge
at Bloomington
Visitor Center
enx+m�nyv,�
No route option
key CAT considerations
adjacent residential yards
11
Creek -based Route
Road -based Route
No Route
• 17 front yards
• 34 front yards
Number of
• 16 side yards
• 38 side yards
N/A
adjacent
• 216 back yards
• 82 back yards
residential
yards
• 243 total adjacent
• 147 total adjacent
N/A
residential yards
residential yards
11
key CAT considerations
proximity of adjacent homes
key CAT considerations
space requirements (available road right-of-way)
Creek -based Route
Road -based Route
No Route
Average
distance from
• 175'
• 90'
N/A
house to trail
Average
. 4 routes require road
8 routes require road
distance from
. 60'
• 45'
N/A
house to
property line
Number of
homes < 25'
• 3 homes
• 8 homes
N/A
from trail
key CAT considerations
space requirements (available road right-of-way)
12
Creek -based Route
Road -based Route
No Route
Proposed
street
redesign/
reconstruction
. 4 routes require road
8 routes require road
(re ovelane/
redesign/reconstruction
redesign/reconstruction
N/A
pagreduce
shoulder
width)
12
key CAT considerations
road crossings
key CAT considerations
driveway crossings
Creek -based Route
Road -based Route
No
Route
Number of
. 11 road crossings
• 31 road crossings
N/A
road crossings
crossings
crossings
Speed limits of
• 9 @ 30 MPH or less
• 29 @ 30 MPH or less
N/A
road crossed
• 2 @ 31-40 MPH
• 2 @ 31-40 MPH
Average annual
• 4 @ <5,000 AADT
• 23 @ <5,000 AADT
N/A
daily traffic of
• 2 °@ 51000 to 6,999 AADT
• 2 @ 5,000 to 6,999 AADT
N/A
road crossed
2 @ 7,000 to 9,000 AADT
• 4 @ 7,000 to 9,000 AADT
crossings
• 3 @ 9,001 to 47,000 AADT
• 2 @ 9,001 to 47,000 AADT
• 4 local roads
• 23 local roads
Functional
5 collector roads
• 6 collector roads
N/A
class of road
1 'B' minor arterial road
• 1 'B' minor arterial road
N/A
crossed
1 'A' Minor arterial
• 1 'A' Minor arterial
(reliever) road
(reliever) road
key CAT considerations
driveway crossings
13
Creek -based Route
Road -based Route
No
Route
• 7 single family driveway
• 24 single family driveway
crossings
crossings
• 18 multi -family driveway
• 23 multi -family driveway
crossings
crossings
• 4 low turnover commercial
• 9 low turnover commercial
N/A
Number of
driveway crossings
driveway crossings
driveway
. 2 high turnover
• 4 high turnover
crossings
commercial driveway
commercial driveway
crossings
crossings
• 31 driveway crossings
• 60 driveway crossings
N/A
13
creek -based route: considerations
• Pros:
- Meets regional trail network needs/connects Edina to network
- Opens public park land along creek to public use
- Connects an additional 150 acres of public park land in Edina
- Provides a high quality recreational trail experience
- Off-road access to school complex
• Cons:
- Larger number of residences adjacent to trail
- Perceived negative impacts of trail on adjacent residences
- Limited access points to trail when along creek
- Higher initial cost than road route
road -based route: considerations
• Pros:
- Meets regional trail network needs/connects Edina to
network
- Lower cost than Creek route
- Fewer residences adjacent to trail
- More frequent access points
• Cons:
- Less safe for trail users due to more road and driveway
crossings
- Less attractive trail setting and experience
- Some instances where trail will be very close to
adjacent residences
- Less direct route
14
C]
no route: considerations
• Three Rivers funding will be directed to other
Park District projects
• Edina will not be connected to the regional trail
network
• Access to the Edina High School complex north
of Hwy 62 will continue to be on sidewalks along
Gleason and Tracy
cost
15
Creek -based
route
Road -based
route
No route
Capital costs for
$20 million
$17 million
$Ci
Edina segment
Operations and
$185,000/
$185,000/
$0
maintenance
annually
annually
(O/M) costs for
entire regional trail
15
Edina City Council key questions
1. Are additional trailhead facilities proposed?
2. What is the City's role in the design phase?
3. How do trails influence property values?
4. Who is responsible to build, maintain, operate,
and fund the trail?
5. What are the common public safety trends?
6. Can the City include conditions on the required
trail easement?
7. More information on the project?
requested Park Board action:
Recommend one route to the Edina City
Council for consideration and approval
16
17
•
J
7
0
7
o,
C
O
l
O1
7
a
O
Sr
N
O
0
lD
to
C
V
Q n
m
0 70
A)
a �
=r 3
m
0
y
S
N N
v
d
o •<
< O
< <n
rD 0
7
V)
0 T
O O
o
Ln
(D C
a' o
T r�r
LO
O 4
1 S
a m
C)
T (�
C =
7
rr ZIn
OrD
C
v a
rt n
o
ai
r)
(D
7
N
O nr
C l0
T rt
l Q
(D a
S O
O rt
3
(D O
rt
0-
Q
c o
(
Ln
D
tL
Ln
-0 r0 -r
OT
3 0
O 0
3
3
(D C
3 -o
O
r=Or 3
O O
O
a to
7 S
L rD
Ln �
O) �
O �
6 N
O
73 T
O ':�
N
rt
n
O
3
a,
rD
a
0
N
O
a
G
a
c
w
T
S
o,
rt
to
C
O
rD
a
S
rD
Ol
m o7 S
3 C -i
_
3 (D -E m
L11.N
ZI (D N
0
OO ^ (D O O
S X- 3
rn w (D A p 3
(D t0 fD
a 3 O fD Tr
d O to
O!
01
n = < a
Q < T
o a O s
N n -n (D (D
!n O1 rt
0 0 o a
a U1 Q"
a n r C
fD C
co r
0 -0 a
(D o o
Ln
a CD Q
L 0 V
7 l O Z
O d m
r* a O O
7 � N
a m
n
n (D (D
fD D- 7
Ln L a
C (p n
a a
'O T
_.
O C to
rt
oo c
C
0 O O
O0 rlr
C
(D Q
O
Q
3 S
o ni(D
(D rt
aj
rt � Ol
O rt
7 rr O
� � 7
to Ln
v O O
T -0
C O (D
CD
(n 0 3,
O O d
to n
T N
S T
Ln O O Q
O T to
Lo C
rt ai_ -0
S '0
(D rt O
T Ort rt
a �
(D 0
0-
-PI
-PI d
3 N o
(D N
ai
S d
a m
En
o-
r T (n
wS (D
O (D a
(D j
t0
C), a 0
�r 1 O O
a r r Z
<' r - V 7
(p Ul (D (Ji N
0 c 3
rD
rD7 (D (D
a V C
O < C (D
E m
v 707
UI eTr OI
(D — (D
L a W to
tc O W O
:3 m =3 M
(D N a D
CIL
O 0r
= T T d
(D � (�D
O O `n 0
rt O
z
rD 3 m Lo
D o c
a o N<
o c m
n °c a�.3 0mm9°
0 2
mc\ n
�
v �
� o
N=
N
A
�
?c
nd
^a
O•
a
�
ao
T
T
0
N c
d
Q
O
O
6
N tD
�a
A
2
D
2
O
O
C
N
•
J
7
0
7
o,
C
O
l
O1
7
a
O
Sr
N
O
0
lD
to
C
V
Q n
m
0 70
A)
a �
=r 3
m
0
y
S
N N
v
d
o •<
< O
< <n
rD 0
7
V)
0 T
O O
o
Ln
(D C
a' o
T r�r
LO
O 4
1 S
a m
C)
T (�
C =
7
rr ZIn
OrD
C
v a
rt n
o
ai
r)
(D
7
N
O nr
C l0
T rt
l Q
(D a
S O
O rt
3
(D O
rt
0-
Q
c o
(
Ln
D
tL
Ln
-0 r0 -r
OT
3 0
O 0
3
3
(D C
3 -o
O
r=Or 3
O O
O
a to
7 S
L rD
Ln �
O) �
O �
6 N
O
73 T
O ':�
N
rt
n
O
3
a,
rD
a
0
N
O
a
G
a
c
w
T
S
o,
rt
to
C
O
rD
a
S
rD
Ol
m o7 S
3 C -i
_
3 (D -E m
L11.N
ZI (D N
0
OO ^ (D O O
S X- 3
rn w (D A p 3
(D t0 fD
a 3 O fD Tr
d O to
O!
01
n = < a
Q < T
o a O s
N n -n (D (D
!n O1 rt
0 0 o a
a U1 Q"
a n r C
fD C
co r
0 -0 a
(D o o
Ln
a CD Q
L 0 V
7 l O Z
O d m
r* a O O
7 � N
a m
n
n (D (D
fD D- 7
Ln L a
C (p n
a a
'O T
_.
O C to
rt
oo c
C
0 O O
O0 rlr
C
(D Q
O
Q
3 S
o ni(D
(D rt
aj
rt � Ol
O rt
7 rr O
� � 7
to Ln
v O O
T -0
C O (D
CD
(n 0 3,
O O d
to n
T N
S T
Ln O O Q
O T to
Lo C
rt ai_ -0
S '0
(D rt O
T Ort rt
a �
(D 0
0-
-PI
-PI d
3 N o
(D N
ai
S d
a m
En
o-
r T (n
wS (D
O (D a
(D j
t0
C), a 0
�r 1 O O
a r r Z
<' r - V 7
(p Ul (D (Ji N
0 c 3
rD
rD7 (D (D
a V C
O < C (D
E m
v 707
UI eTr OI
(D — (D
L a W to
tc O W O
:3 m =3 M
(D N a D
CIL
O 0r
= T T d
(D � (�D
O O `n 0
rt O
z
rD 3 m Lo
D o c
a o N<
o c m
a a<
e b
0 2
3�3
�
d
n c
z Q Q' F
naW3
o cpi
�
3
-
T
T
n
d
3
=3
ao
W
O
V
O�
O
N
p C O b-
-
F
b
n
A
��3
O
7 C G
"
O O S
c b 7�
ac
m
0 o
A
0
P
°
N
n O
0 0 o
D
S
3 0
i
d
n
O'
ry
Amn
9C
N
CL
m 3
N d
< n
N
< d
b N
A
O
N
O
C p
A
�
z
z
z
z
°
A
D
D
C
A
•
--1 Ik
O c =
C S
C lD
n rD
n
r O
N
rD
O Z) d
0 (D r `C
o 2. O
d O Q
n
o a h
0-
(D
rt
3 ( O
ZI
3 a 0-
C:
-
C C
O v rr) .
0 a n
m
3 r ° n
3 N O
O a
r d
n O K 3
to m
C
v 'D
O rr
Ul
a n<
a��
o
0 2
O
^••
m 10
d
n c
z Q Q' F
naW3
o cpi
�
3
-
T
T
n
d
m
In
ao
o Oi ^o o
rP rp) @ lPD
a
O�
n
p C O b-
N-9 N
d M d
"'
n
A
��3
000ui
7 C G
"
O O S
c b 7�
ac
o��N
0 o
09
P
Q n O
n O
0 0 o
D
S
3 0
i
°��
ry
Amn
9C
n
n
m 3
N d
< n
N
< d
b N
N
O
C p
A
�
• .- m n�
�.D aOp w
n. a ni
r)e rle ro
rt
•
I
0
m33.�a
000^
X
a
a
-
x
�oo0
03
o
d
a d 000' d
o o o o
3o
A
d• c
CL
? -0 OJ w O N
�D V V
06
O
w
a
a n o
°
m
A/�
a °
n
000
o O o O
o O O o O O
o o r
d o
d
nen
6
2
rt
N
D
j
D
D
C O
R
C:3
c
f
2
C
�
N
W 0 U, W W W
0
N
0 0 0 o O
0)
0
LA
7"
rr
O
O
z
a
;o
z
z
A
o
ui
D
D
O
C
7C
3 rt
<
O
2
A
(D
•
--1 Ik
O c =
C S
C lD
n rD
n
r O
N
rD
O Z) d
0 (D r `C
o 2. O
d O Q
n
o a h
0-
(D
rt
3 ( O
ZI
3 a 0-
C:
-
C C
O v rr) .
0 a n
m
3 r ° n
3 N O
O a
r d
n O K 3
to m
C
v 'D
O rr
Ul
a n<
a��
o
0 2
O
^••
L
Zo
z Q Q' F
O 3 j J 0 0
O O x< h
o cpi
�
3
-
No
T
n
d
m
N
o Oi ^o o
rP rp) @ lPD
r1P rPi
Qec
n
p C O b-
N-9 N
d M d
"'
n
A
��3
000ui
7 C G
"
O O S
c b 7�
ac
o��N
0 o
09
P
ao N
n O
0 0 o
D
S
3 0
i
°��
d
x
Amn
��umy
n
n
m 3
O.
as
-
a
000
ggg
00
O
C p
A
�
• .- m n�
�.D aOp w
n. a ni
r)e rle ro
n. •
rpJ�
•
I
0
m33.�a
000^
"o
a
a
-
x
�oo0
03
o
d
a d 000' d
o o o o
3o
A
d• c
SIN o -0 OI
? -0 OJ w O N
�D V V
06
O
c
m
o
a
DDD
fD61
jp
n
000
o O o O
o O O o O O
o o r
A
2
Z
2
2
O Z
D
j
D
D
C O
R
•
--1 Ik
O c =
C S
C lD
n rD
n
r O
N
rD
O Z) d
0 (D r `C
o 2. O
d O Q
n
o a h
0-
(D
rt
3 ( O
ZI
3 a 0-
C:
-
C C
O v rr) .
0 a n
m
3 r ° n
3 N O
O a
r d
n O K 3
to m
C
v 'D
O rr
Ul
1 QQ n
-0 n o
S - O N 7
O C O Or
In N C
Cl,
(D rn'r.
O
< a o
n <
D O to 7 n
O N (o O
a a to O
o m L 0
O (D
_rt (D rr
rt 7 !n d O
(D O.
OO
S N pl d
rr (D ' -O
S
3 n
l O
0 rn3 s
(D "O (D j
O 3
a a S 0
o n
N O O
T (D
n S rt m
C (D a O
a r = —
m Ln N
d 1 K O
O N
T 3
(D(il
T rr
(D O
d to 3
rD
rD
Q
n rt
rD (na
a
p :3 O
ET T — X
Sm n
LZ)
rD a S
O
rt n 7'
S r O1 N
(D `G a
n O (7
� < T
(D O
n_
Dr N 0 O
D.
O N W
C rNt rD
rt a
rD .< rt
M o
� S
3 7 rD
o rD n, rD
l !n O1(n
rt N 6
O 7 7 rt
n tQ < 0)
a -T o
(D o
a T C O!
S 3
z N
r
rD
S (D rt O
7 ° 3
O
O -0 d
01 C O r0 -r
a rD a rD
0
a
C)
I
0
U)
.A�
W
O
^••
L
Zo
z Q Q' F
O 3 j J 0 0
O O x< h
N z
Z w
rt
S
Z
CD
T
a
O
rt
OD
N
mvvo
N N
o3
O
cm cd
Qec
N ID ID rt
p C O b-
N-9 N
d M d
A�
C O
IID -i
O O O
7 a
.Nirt 7 �r n O
N
N rr
7 C G
"
O O S
c b 7�
n 7 n
m" m
0
a 0
a d^
O m
o a 0
ID O
a d b
x
m
a m
n
n
m 3
obr
O. (D
O'
A 7
O
C p
x n T
<
0
�,o
o
3
-n+
a,
n
rD
x �c
-
x
m
d• c
SIN o -0 OI
? -0 OJ w O N
�D V V
N 7
r�
O
c
m
o
fD61
O
o O o O
o O O o O O
o o r
r-
(D
<_
hN+
3
z
N
I
C:3
N
f
C
�
0
0 0 0 0
W 0 U, W W W
0 0
N
0 0 0 o O
o 0
0
1 QQ n
-0 n o
S - O N 7
O C O Or
In N C
Cl,
(D rn'r.
O
< a o
n <
D O to 7 n
O N (o O
a a to O
o m L 0
O (D
_rt (D rr
rt 7 !n d O
(D O.
OO
S N pl d
rr (D ' -O
S
3 n
l O
0 rn3 s
(D "O (D j
O 3
a a S 0
o n
N O O
T (D
n S rt m
C (D a O
a r = —
m Ln N
d 1 K O
O N
T 3
(D(il
T rr
(D O
d to 3
rD
rD
Q
n rt
rD (na
a
p :3 O
ET T — X
Sm n
LZ)
rD a S
O
rt n 7'
S r O1 N
(D `G a
n O (7
� < T
(D O
n_
Dr N 0 O
D.
O N W
C rNt rD
rt a
rD .< rt
M o
� S
3 7 rD
o rD n, rD
l !n O1(n
rt N 6
O 7 7 rt
n tQ < 0)
a -T o
(D o
a T C O!
S 3
z N
r
rD
S (D rt O
7 ° 3
O
O -0 d
01 C O r0 -r
a rD a rD
0
a
C)
I
0
U)
.A�
W
O
C
Ln
a
l
OJ
3
air
Z
O
X-
0
3
a
Sr
CD
Ol
7
(D
CL
Q
n
O
O
O
7
d
Ol
X
w<
n
O
CL
m
O
Z w
rt
S
Z
CD
T
a
O
rt
N
r�r a
(D
O
rt
N
p�
to
(D
O -0
D ,
O
x
O
o
rt
a o
in
o
o
-o
°
c
0
<
-
o
3
Ln
a,
n
rD
O
rsD
o
�
(D
<_
^
3
z
O
C:3
O
d
C
<
O
<
O rr
0!
Ln
LA
7"
rr
O
O
O
;o
°1n
w
o
rt
3
7C
3 rt
<
O
2
(D
d
N
O
N
O O
_
O
=
N
O
N
M
/�
�i •
NW
E
rOr
p
3
a
0
~
3
Ln
o
-Q
O)
H
m N
N
O
C
(D
7
Ln
O
CD
70n 0
°'
a
l�
o
�°
T
Q
r
(n
rt
o'
=
� v
o
(D
o
d
v
p
OJ
a
a •<
=
S
(D
(D
T
=
7
CL
O
C
Ln
a
l
OJ
3
air
Z
O
X-
0
3
a
Sr
CD
Ol
7
(D
CL
Q
n
O
O
O
7
d
Ol
X
w<
n
O
CL
m
O
0)
0
, ^^ .0 Q Q 'd
V / � U U W
c
O
-O
—ro _
L
O
F
O
O
C
�
U
O
41
N
L
.L
z
o
C:
Q)
O
ro
U
C:Q
p1
W
h+
c
E
L
O
Lno
v
L
Ln
V
(6
(LO
0)
-0
^l
W
0
0)4�
C:
v
c
=3
C:L--r-
U)
L
co
Q
Off.
C
J
X
Q
N
0)
L
CLQ
Q
L-
D
o
m
C
O
O
O
L
!E
O
C:
a
o
�
C
a
L
LL
1
j
+J
O
U
I
O
�
L
Cl
L
a
L
C1
Y
O
L
N
Up
O
C
1
L
1-
U
O
_0_0
N_
U')QLML
a+
N
c
L
C
O
+, N
1
t
O
C
X
O
>
v
au
4-
f6
X
o
C
CO
-0
C
L
p
-0
O
.�
N
o
NN
cu
U
C
X
L
(1)°ro
E
v
o
o
-2
O(n
4•
0
70
3
a
o
c
c
)
U
c
L
VI
Y
iC
OQ
CL
-0
Cl
O
Cl
A--
U,
Cl
4,
O
O
U
O
L
O
O
"O
T-
1
°
E
c
c
-O
Ll ---
O
a
L
O
E
C
L
fn
O
CL
N
O
0
c
UJ
U)
L
70
i
c
o
U
C.
t�D
D
D
�
Z�
°
'
o
-0
>
a�
c-0
O
L
+,
E
L
E
L=
U
_
_
a.
v
+-J
�_
O
v
O
-�
O
N
E
E
Q
3
L
ECO
.-
C
o
4
'
O
O
E
>_
O
O
L
O
c
L-
0
C
E
L
ZQ)E
1
a
1
LL-
S
0)
0
, ^^ .0 Q Q 'd
V / � U U W
E"
N
EN
U
U
c
O
-O
E
N
F
O
O
C
�
O
L
N
N
L
.L
z
o
C:
Q)
O
L
C:Q
p1
W
h+
E
L
O
Q
41
N
L
Ln
V
(6
(LO
0)
-0
^l
W
0
p
C:
v
c
=3
C
L
U)
L
co
Q
Off.
C
J
X
Q
N
CO
L
CLQ
Q
0)
d
I
m
C
O
4-
L
'L
Z:)
v
!E
O
C:
01
Co
(L)
C
a
L
LL
1
j
+J
O
U
I
W
�
L
Cl
L
a
L
C1
C
O
L
N
>.
1
L
J
L
C
L
_0_0
N_
U')QLML
i
c
QvL
C
O
+, N
1
t
OaU�
Cpv`
X
N-0
v
au
4-
f6
X
U
C
CO
-0
C
L
p
ai
w
O
.�
N
o
NN
cu
U
C
X
L
L
E
v
o
o
p
o
4•
0
4,
3
a
L
o
o
I
L
U
c
—
ami
L
0
OQ
CL
-0
U)
_
U
L
U,
Cl
C
>.
0
L
O
L
O
U
E
-0
-a
1
°
E
O
a
LC
L
a
L
O
L
L
(D
CL
N
I
c
UJ
U)
L
w
4"
E"
N
EN
U
U
m
c
W
O
V
f-
m
c
0
0
v
cc
Y
a
v
V
c
O
O
N
N
F
O
C a
L
C
O
N
N
L
.L
z
L
Q)
O
L
C:Q
p1
W
h+
L
L
O
V)
L
7
L
(6
(LO
I
]
, ..
0
p
O
L>0)
2
1
=3
C
L
-O
C
>
m
Off.
C
J
O
N
CO
L
CLQ
Q
>
d
I
m
-a_
o
a
Z:)
v
C:
01
Co
(L)
C
O
L
LL
1
j
Y
'�
U
I
W
0)
LL
L
a
O
U
C
O
L
N
>.
1
L
J
L
C
L
C
O
N_
U')QLML
i
UU1
QvL
C
O
+, N
1
t
OaU�
Cpv`
C
N-0
v
Co
4-
f6
X
U
C
p
O
C
L
O
L
L
.�
N
L
m
NN
C
U
C
X
L
L
Q
E
v
o
p
o
I
a
L
m
L
O
X
o
I
L
U
c
—
�
CL
L
OQ
CL
mcn
+`�
p
>
Q
_
E
QJ
L
W
++
0
I
O
L
fu
OC
wo
1
3w:
E
O
a
1
L
Q
Qm)
_N
a
C)
CL
I
d
N-0
-0c
vi
L
vii
L
c
o
c
o
C.
t�D
D
D
'
Z�
°
'
w
o
>
C
N
c-0
O
L
t
L
L
E
L=
U
_
_
a�
C
_j0) o
m
c
W
O
V
f-
m
c
0
0
v
cc
Y
a
v
V
N
1
L
C a
I
O
N
N
L
.L
L
L
L
O
L
L
p1
h+
L
L
O
V)
L
7
L
r
o�
W
, ..
0
p
i
a
L
U
U
ro
m
Off.
+O_�
C
CLQ
N
>
d
-p
`�
(7
Z:)
p
OU
41
O
N
Q
'
co
fn
1
j
70
E
U
z�°
c
J
LL
L
O
ZI
O
L
>.
=
>
L
C
j,
C
O
Q
i
I
>
-
N
U
r`o
C
�
-0
co
U
Q
LL
C
L
L
.�
O
L
E
C
Ci
C
X
L
�
Q
E
L
�
p
Zj
c
O
L
O
N
L
O
X
U)
O
�
CL
L
OQ
CL
i
In
LL
L
I
QJ
L
W
++
I
O
L
}'
Q
d
1
CL
L
3
c
p
a
.�
CL
I
d
N-0
-0c
vi
L
vii
L
c
o
c
o
+L
I
C:)
L
Q
-o
�
4J
p�
o
�
`�
L=
U
_
_
a�
C
_j0) o
v
-�
O
Q
E
E
Q
3
L
C
:DI
L
CO
Q�'
=
U
L
L
3
Ol
C
"Ld
L-
0
U
0
1
a
1
'c
O
E
Q
L
O
(ten
U
>'
(a
_
'
L
�
i-
O
O
'
aU
M
cm
m
O
m
a
fu
w
y-�
Z�
-0,aj
C
c
L
I
O
o
L
+-+
I
-O
O
N
E
L
L-
O
C
'L
L
d
Ol
I
CLQ
O
o�
>
N
p
C5
1
_�70
L
a
L
'G
L
I
Q
7
I
a)
L
L
a
c
a
-O
N
a
"O
L
O
7
L
O
C
a)
L
-�
{A
Q)
-o
C
L
m
C
L
Q
co
L
c
W
N
C
U
o
L
p
a
c
O
L
L
O
a
m
1
"o
(L)
O
G
L
U
�.
L
L
c
L
4.
a)
>
Q)
c
L
6
L
3
CL
U
CL
aL.,
N
m
L
U"
a=
�
I
m
I
z
w
m
p
m
c
W
O
V
f-
m
c
0
0
v
cc
Y
a
v
V
t
w'
d�li`iS i.S'
h+
r
c
a
r
00
W
, ..
0
4 4
U
m
0
aft
•
o
ro
v
% b
10
z�°
Key City Council Questions
(October 12, 2010)
Are additional trailhead facilities proposed?
Not atthis time. There are several existing public parking, toilet
and water facilities along the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
corridor that may also serve the needs of regional trail users.
The Park District will work with the City to identify appropriate
trailhead amenity locations on regional trail signage and in
regional trail publications. If requested by the City, the Park
District will consider additional trailhead amenities.
What role does the City have in the design phase?
The City is a critical project partner and a welcome participant
in the design phase. The Park District and local communities
typically collaborate to determine final trail alignment and
design which works favorably for all parties, including local
community members and adjacent property owners. This
same collaboration is expected during the implementation of
Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail.
How do trails influence property values?
There are many studies on the relationship of property
value and proximity of trails. While different studies result
in different findings, the national trend indicates a positive
relationship between trails and property values. The Analysis
of the Impacts of Bike and Recreation Trails on Suburban
Property Values' study prepared for Hennepin County
Community Works by Robert Luckow, supports these findings.
The study concludes that as distance from the trail increases,
the sales price of a home decreases. For the trail corridors
and properties included in the study, property selling price
decreases $2.99 for every additional foot of walking distance
between the trail and subject property. This equates to a 5.8%
increase in selling price for an average home adjacent to the
trail compared to an average home located 4,300 feet from
the trail. This study includes four regional trail corridors in
Hennepin County and accounts for over ten variables which
may influence property selling price.
Who is responsible to build, maintain, operate,
and fund the trail?
The Park District is responsible for building, maintaining,
operating and funding the regional trail. The Park District
operates regional trails during spring, summer and fall. If the
City of Edina elects to obtain a winter use permit, the City
would assume maintenance and operation responsibilities
during the winter months.
How much will the trail cost, and how will the trail
befunded?
The preliminary planning phase trail construction estimate for
the seven to eight miles of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in the
City of Edina is between $17 and $20 million.
The Park District anticipates utilizing a variety of funding
sources and partnership opportunities to construct the
regional trail. Potential funding sources and collaborative
opportunities for the project may include:
• Federal Surface Transportation Program/
Transportation Enhancement funds
• Three Rivers Park District General Obligation Bonds
• Metropolitan Council Regional Parks Capital
Improvement Program funding
• Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Parks and Trails Legacy grant program funds
• Other governmental agency partnerships
Annual trail operation costs are an estimated $185,000. The
primary funding source for operating costs is Three Rivers Park
District property tax revenue, with some revenue received
from the State of Minnesota as part of the Operations and
Maintenance Fund allocations from the Metropolitan Council.
What are the common public safety trends the
Park District is observing and responding to along
multi -use regional trail corridors?
The two most significant trends Public Safety staff are
observing and responding to are (1) bicycle trail users failing
to stop at trail stop signs and (2) trail users failing to follow
trail etiquette rules. The Public Safety Department has taken
a proactive approach to both concerns by increasing patrol
and through the issuance of violation tickets. The Park District
has designed a "Share the Trail" educational campaign to
inform and encourage trail users to respectfully and safely
share the trail and exhibit good trail etiquette. On some trail
segments, staff has responded and worked to immediately
remove graffiti. Although the numbers of calls are minimal,
Public Safety is positioned to respond to requests for medical
assistance or trail accidents.
Can the City include trail easement conditions to
ensure timely trail implementation?
Yes. The Park District has trailway agreements with several
communities that include designated timeframes for financing,
design, and implementation which go into effect upon receipt
of trail easement to the Park District.
Where can residents find out more information?
More information is available at _400�
three riversparks.org/news.aspx.
ThreeRivers
PARK DISTRICT
3D=
Where are boardwalks proposed?
Boardwalks are proposed in locations where the trail crosses a itE
wetland. Preliminary planning indicates that boardwalks may
be required to minimize wetland impacts on alternative trail
routes 1, 2, 5, 5D, 5E, 9, 11, 13, and 19. Approximately 7,500
to 8,000 linear feet of boardwalk are estimated depending on
the alignment and final wetland delineation.
A map of the proposed boardwalk locations will be available
on the project website (threeriversparks.org/news.aspx -
Planning for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail) under the Joint
Work Session Overview heading.
How high will the boardwalks be?
Boardwalk height will vary depending on the location.
Boardwalks or bridges which cross the creek may be required
to have a three-foot clearance between the 50 -year floodplain
elevation and the base of the structure.
Boardwalks through wetlands and floodplains that do not cross
the creek do not have a minimum height requirement. Instead,
boardwalk elevation is established based on site conditions
and the potential for floodplain and wetland impacts. In order
to minimize potential impacts on flooding, boardwalk elevation
is set so as to not impede the normal flooding conditions.
To minimize the potential impacts on wetlands, boardwalk
elevation is set to allow wetland vegetation to establish under
the boardwalk.
Boardwalk design, location, and elevation are reviewed by a
Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) consisting of water resource
experts. The TEP is responsible for determining potential
wetland and floodplain impacts and necessary mitigation
measures. The TEP review and recommendations will play a
critical role in determining final boardwalk design, location,
and elevation.
(October 12, 2010)
Photograph taken at railing height, looking south. Note
townhomes across wetland, approximately 650 feet away
(Representative of Route 2). -Luce Line Regional Trail
Does the Park District have representative photos
of boardwalks along regional trail corridors? Photograph taken from northern edge of townhome
complex looking north towards trail. Trail is across wetland,
Yes. Representative photos were taken along the Luce Line
approximately 650 feet away (Representative of Route 2).
Regional Trail south of Medicine Lake to show viewshed of
-Luce Line Regional Trail
boardwalk across wetland to private property and viewshed
from private property across wetland to boardwalk (see upper corridors and in parks. The Park District has not received
right). any complaints from adjacent property owners regarding the
Additional representative photos will be available on the sound generated by trail users on the boardwalks. The Park
project website (threeriversparks.org/news.aspx - Planning District will conduct a study to determine the noise levels
for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail) under the Joint Work associated with typical boardwalk design. If boardwalk noise
Session Overview heading. is determined to have potential negative impacts on adjacent
properties, the Park District will evaluate
How much noise do boardwalks generate? alternative design and construction methods l�
The Park District has several boardwalks along regional trail during the design phase. Three vers
PARK DISTRICT