HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-02-14 Park Board Packet\t�('UHutUi'{trl fl�
EDINA PARK BOARD
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2006
7:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM (Upper level)
EDINA CITY HALL
AGENDA
*1. Approval of January 10, 2006, Park Board Minutes.
*2. Election of Officers.
*3. Off -Leash Dog Park — Van Valkenburg Park.
4. Needs Assessment Survey — Committee Report.
5. Updates.
a. Gymnasium Construction.
b. Edina Youth Sports Taskforce.
c. Todd Park Hockey Rink.
6. Other.
*7. Adjournment.
*These are agenda items that require or request Park Board action.
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424-1394
Park and Recreation Department
www.cityofedina.com
City of Edina
952-826-0367
FAX 952-826-0385
TTY 952-826-0379
Memo
To: Edina Park Board.
From: John Keprios, Directo
Edina Park and Recreatio Department
Date: February 6, 2006
Re: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2006, PARK BOARD MEETING STAFF
REPORT.
Enclosed you should find the following items:
1. Tuesday, January 10, 2006, Park Board Minutes.
2. Tuesday, February 14, 2006, Park Board Agenda.
3. Todd Park Hockey and General Skating Rink Concerns and Criteria to be Monitored.
4. May 17, 2005, Report/Recommendation to City Council on Off -Leash Dog Park
Proposal.
5. Minutes from May 17, 2005, Council Meeting.
The following is the monthly staff report concerning each item on the agenda with the exception
of Approval of the Minutes and Other. "Other" is listed on the agenda for other information
items (not requiring formal action); last minute items that may come up between now and the
Park Board meeting, plus, cover any other concerns of Park Board members and/or attendees.
PARK BOARD MEETING IN THE
COMMUNITY ROOM
EDINA CITY HALL
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
The Tuesday, February 14, 2006, Park Board meeting will be at 7:00 p.m. in the Community
Room at Edina City Hall. If you are unable to attend, please call either Office Coordinator, Janet
Canton, at 826-0435 or me at 826-0430.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
In February of each year, the Park Board self -elects a Chairman and Vice Chairman. At the
beginning of the meeting, I will request nominations from the Park Board for Chairman. If there
is more than one nomination, Janet Canton will pass around paper ballots for Park Board
members to vote for their choice of Chairperson. The same process will then be used to elect a
Vice Chairman. In the case of a tie, nominations for that position will reopen and the process
will start over until a Chairman and Vice Chairman are chosen.
The main duties of the Chairman are:
1. To work with staff in establishing an agenda prior to each meeting.
2. Chair the process of each Park Board meeting. (In other words, the Chairman provides
leadership that keeps Park Board meetings orderly, democratic and encourages input from all
Park Board members and guests).
3. Serve as spokesperson for the Park Board at City Council meetings and other public
functions.
4. Assign Park Board related duties to Park Board members.
The Vice Chairman is to carry out the duties of the Chairman in the absence of the Park Board
Chairman.
Park Board action is requested on this agenda item.
OFF -LEASH DOG PARK - VAN VALKENBURG
Staff is proposing to go forward with the off -leash dog park concept at Van Valkenburg Park by
paying for approximately $11,000 worth of 48" fencing out of the Park Maintenance Department
operating budget. As you may recall, in April of 2005 the Park Board approved the following
motion:
Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROACH THE EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ON
GIVEN THAT WE CAN GET FUNDING WE WILL AGREE THAT WE WILL BUILD
THE INTERIM OFF -LEASH DOG PARK AT VAN VALKENBURG PARK ON THE
CONDITION THAT WE WILL MATCH IT. IF THEY CAN COME UP WITH $5,000 OR
WHATEVER HALF IS THAT WE WOULD AGREE TO BUILD THE OFF -LEASH DOG
PARK.
Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION.
Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board if they want to address the non-resident issue now or is
that a separate issue.
Todd Fronek AMENDED HIS MOTION TO INCLUDE BOTH RESIDENTS AND NON-
RESIDENTS, RESIDENTS PAYING A $25.00 FEE AND NON-RESIDENTS A $50.00
• FEE.
Karla Sitek SECONDED THE AMENDMENT.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
I never received the $5,000 donation as promised from an Edina resident, which is why we did
not complete the project in 2005. I recommend that we go forward with the off -leash dog park
project at Van Valkenburg Park as proposed in 2005 except pay for the entire amount out of the
Park Maintenance Department Professional Services budget account #1647; Paths and Hard
Surfaces. That budget was increased from $61,800 in 2005 to $83,036 for 2006 to help pay for
this fencing and attempt to catch up on repairs needed for hard surface areas, such as tennis
courts, basketball courts, pathways, and parking lots. This particular fund is also used to cover
maintenance of 23 playground sites, park lighting, picnic tables, fencing, bleachers, tables,
chairs, park benches, signs and drinking fountains throughout Edina's 40 parks.
I have also enclosed a copy of the Park Board's recommendation to the City Council from May
of 2005 that was approved by City Council. The minutes of that council meeting are also
enclosed. Arguably this agenda item may not need further approval; however, the funding
source is different from the original request; plus, enough time has elapsed, that I want to ensure
that the Park Board and Council are still supportive of the concept and timing of the project.
Formal action is requested on this agenda item.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY - COMMITTEE REPORT
As discussed at the January Park Board meeting, staff is proposing to conduct a park and
recreation department related community -wide needs assessment survey. Interested Park Board
2
members are invited to attend a meeting at 6:00 p.m. on February 14th to begin the dialogue
about the process. Unfortunately, Decision Resources staff is unable to attend that evening but is
planning to attend our next needs assessment committee meeting just prior to our March Park
Board meeting.
This committee will collectively give the Park Board a briefing on what was discussed and
recommended for a process. The questions we will be addressing at our 6:00 p.m. meeting will
include:
1. What are the key park and recreation issues in the community that the Park Board would
like to have feedback from the greater community?
2. What process of community input is desired?
3. Who should serve on the needs assessment survey taskforce committee?
4. Should we solicit other consulting agencies in a formal RFP process to conduct the
survey?
There may be more questions at hand; however, if we can get our arms around those four, we
will have accomplished a lot.
No formal action is requested on this agenda item.
ITPDATF.S
Ed MacHolda, I and Youth Sports Taskforce/Park Board members will give the Park Board
verbal updates on:
A. Gymnasiums Construction.
B. Youth Sports Taskforce.
C. Todd Park Hockey Rink.
No formal action is requested on this agenda item.
OTHER
This is also an opportunity for Park Board members and residents to address other concerns.
EDINA PARK BOARD
is TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 2006
7:00 P.M.
EDINA COMMUNITY ROOM
EDINA CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Andy Finsness, Linda Presthus, Todd Fronek, Jeff Sorem, Mike
Damman, George Klus, Gordon Roland
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Weiss, Jeff Johnson, Karla Sitek, Ray O'Connell
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton
OTHERS PRESENT: Dianne Plunkett Latham, Dan Latham, Suzanne Kerwin
I. APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 7, 2005 PARK BOARD MINUTES
Linda Presthus MOVED TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 7, 2005 PARK BOARD
MINUTES. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
II. INTRODUCTION OF NEW PARK BOARD MEMBER GORDON ROLAND
Mr. Klus welcomed Gordon Roland, Park Board's new student member. Mr. Roland
indicated that he is a junior at Edina High School and he has attended Edina public
schools all of his life. He noted that he has participated in a wide variety of sports
including soccer, football, hockey and lacrosse. He stated that he has probably used
every park within Edina. Mr. Roland commented that he has been interested in getting
into government and that is why he applied to be on the Park Board.
III. EDINA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS STUDY — SUZANNE KERWIN
Suzanne Kerwin, a member of the League of Women Voters Edina, informed the Park
Board that she is here regarding a study that the league is doing on volunteer boards and
commissions in Edina. She noted that they are very interested in getting the Park Board's
input for their study on boards and commissions. Ms. Kerwin stated that all Park Board
members should have received a survey and asked that everyone please fill it out and
added that the more that is written the better.
Mr. Klus asked if they are going to see the results of the survey to which Ms. Kerwin
replied that their study should be completed in the spring and as soon as they are able to
they will share those results with the Park Board. Ms. Kerwin thanked everyone for their
participation and time.
IV. NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY
Mr. Klus pointed out that one of the things that the Park Board has discussed off and on
over the last year is to take a good look at their parks and try to come up with some long
range planning with the residents for the parks. He noted that he feels having resident
involvement is very important because he wants the residents to be sure that their
interests are represented, they are being listened to and the needs of the park are being
visited. Mr. Klus stated that in light of wanting to make sure that residents get involved
he thinks they should split up the parks among the Park Board members and work with
the people who live around the parks. Mr. Klus pointed out that there is a capital
improvement plan that is approved every year for the parks; therefore, some planning has
already been done. However, that plan is usually changed somewhat each year
depending on what needs have changed. Mr. Klus again stated that he hopes each Park
Board member will be able to have meetings with the residents who have some real
interests.
Mr. Klus suggested that three or four Park Board members who are not currently serving
on the Youth Task Force Committee meet with staff and come back to next month's Park
Board meeting with some recommendations on how you think the Park Board should
proceed with the needs assessment survey.
Mr. Keprios noted that he wishes to applaud and thank the City Council members for
supporting the Park Board in going forward with the needs assessment survey. He
commented that it is recommended by the National Recreation Park Association to assess
the community and find out how they feel about their park system and programs at least
once every five years. He stated that this is a great way to find out what the issues really
are and have valid statistics confirming them. Mr. Keprios explained that the success in
doing a needs assessment survey really depends on getting as much community input as
possible at the front end and involve as many people as they physically have time for in
an organized fashion. He stated that they are going to need to hire a consultant to help
them through this process; however, it's going to take a lot of the Park Board's volunteer
time to help staff in the process and come up with some ideas.
Mr. Keprios pointed out there are different ways they can approach this. It can be done
park by park or they could hold general public meetings. The important thing is to draw
out and listen to the community, what are the key issues and needs that we are facing that
are not currently being met. He commented that at the end of this they may find that
there are only a couple of things where they really need to change their direction. He
explained that the capital plan sets the direction, however, that is currently on more of a
maintenance track.
Mr. Keprios explained that a needs assessment survey is going to tell them what the
community feels the issues are and with the consultant's help they will then be able to
formulate the questions to then validate what kind of support there is in the whole
2
community for those perceived issues. He commented that even though they do evaluate
their programs regularly it is important to do a community wide needs assessment.
Ms. Presthus stated that she agrees it is important to assess the needs of the community,
however, they need to remember if they talk to the people who live around the parks they
may have very single issues. She noted that she feels what they need to look for when
doing a needs assessment survey is to remember that this is a city with city parks and
therefore we need to look at the overall picture. For example, they are not just looking at
those 150 homes that surround Arden Park. They are looking for an overall picture of the
direction they are going and the only way they can really do that accurately is by hiring a
consultant. Ms. Presthus informed the Park Board that her background for 35 years in is
market research and she knows that the upfront input from listening to what people have
to say and then working with a consultant will turn the needs assessment survey into a
genuine study that goes out to everyone and not just the people who live around the
parks. Ms. Presthus suggested that they possibly look at having two different written
surveys, a long form and a short form in order to get a genuine sampling. She stressed in
her opinion they cannot have individual people talking to individual groups because there
needs to be some component of continuity. She stated that unless there is a consultant
who sits in on every meeting and takes notes then it really isn't valid research, it's just a
bunch of ad hoc answers. Ms. Presthus noted that she has seen a lot of bad studies done.
Mr. Fronek indicated that he would agree with Ms. Presthus in the sense that they do
need to look at some of the broader things, however being a board like this it's easy to
look at just the problem that's in front of them. Therefore, he feels that they need to
come up with some overarching goals as well as decide what the Park Board should be
involved in. Ms. Presthus replied that these overarching goals can guide the smaller
minute problems so that they can point to the biggest goal and say this is what they are
trying to achieve and therefore this is what lead them to make the smaller decision that's
now in front of them.
Mr. Finsness asked who came up with the amount of $19,000 and what does that pay for?
Mr. Keprios replied that he was told by Decision Resources that a general needs
assessment survey done by either phone or mail would cost approximately $16,000. He
noted that he added on another $3,000 just in case they wanted to add some things to
youth sports. Mr. Finsness asked if the City Council is recommending that the Park
Board do a needs assessment survey. Mr. Keprios replied that it actually comes from him
and the money for this is in their operating budget. Mr. Finsness asked how many people
would be surveyed for $19,000 to which Mr. Keprios responded approximately 400 to
600 depending on whether it's done by phone or mail. Also, it will depend on what type
of survey they want done to which the consultant will tell us based on the issues what the
best method would be. Therefore, that's why they need a consultant at the table in order
to be able to answer those questions. Mr. Finsness stated that he thinks this is important
and absolutely should be done.
Mr. Sorem indicated that he doesn't have a lot of experience working with surveys but
• does feel that Ms. Presthus makes a very good point in that they need to look at what is
best for the parks for the community as a whole and not just for those people who
surround the park.
Mr. Damman asked Mr. Klus if he is suggesting that they have an ad hoc committee as
well as a consultant to go and talk to groups. Mr. Klus replied he would like to see a
committee made up of a few Park Board members meet with staff and come up with a
recommendation of how they see fit to move forward with the needs assessment survey.
He noted that he would like for the committee and staff to have a recommendation ready
by the February Park Board meeting.
Ms. Presthus pointed out that the first thing that needs to be done is they need to write
their objectives and what their expected outcome is. At that time a consultant then comes
in to figure out the best way to go about it. Therefore, it's very important to actually
write the objectives of why they are doing this. Ms. Presthus commented that she also
thinks they need to look at what has been done in the past as well as who has done them
because then they can compare what the read of the community was five years ago and
see how the interest has changed over that time. She noted that there are a lot of different
ways to go about this.
Ms. Presthus asked Mr. Keprios if it would be possible for him to get copies of surveys
that have been done in other community park and recreation departments to which Mr.
Keprios replied yes, he can do that. Mr. Keprios commented that a consultant will also
be able to help them and share data because they have done hundreds of surveys and can
share of lot of what they have learned. Ms. Presthus asked if Decision Resources would
be conducting the survey to which Mr. Keprios replied not necessarily, there are a lot of
firms out there. Mr. Keprios commented that depending on how they go about doing the
survey whether they address a master plan or strategic plan and do they want to measure
customer satisfaction or have it be a management study. Mr. Fronek asked if the ad hoc
committee would be able to decide that scope within the next month assuming there are
all of these options. He noted that he would like to volunteer to be on the ad hoc
committee to figure out the scope of what the needs assessment survey is.
Mr. Roland stated that he thinks it's very important that they find out what needs to be
done in the future. Also, it's very important that the survey is done right because it will
set up a precedent for years to come. Therefore, he feels that resources from prior tests
and other cities would be important in creating what kind of survey they want. Mr.
Keprios commented that he thinks Mr. Roland could be a big help in finding out what's
the right venue in getting input from students.
Mr. Sorem indicated that he thinks they should do a two-part survey. He thinks that they
should talk to the neighbors and ask about the little things such as where to put a swing
set or if they need more garbage cans because they aren't going to get that information
from a survey. He suggested that each Park Board member could take a park they live by
or have an interest in and knock on a few doors and ask people what they would like to
see in their parks. Mr. Sorem commented that the small things are important to a lot of
the residents. Mr. Finsness noted that they would be looking at two separate surveys in
4
that one is random and the other is not. Mr. Sorem stated that it could almost be two
separate parts because there really wouldn't be any extra cost to it other than the Park
Board's volunteer time.
Mr. Klus asked the Park Board members who would be interested in working on an ad
hoc committee to help staff come up with a recommendation on what direction should be
taken for the needs assessment survey. The following Park Board members volunteered
to be on the committee: Andy Finsness, Linda Presthus, Todd Fronek, Mike Damman
and Gordon Roland.
George Klus MOVED TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE AN AD HOC
COMMITTEE OF THE PARK BOARD TO MEET WITH STAFF AND MAKE A
RECOMMENDATION AT THE NEXT PARK BOARD MEETING AS TO THE
DIRECTION OF THE NEEDS ASSESSMENT SURVEY.
Todd Fronek MOVED. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION.
Diane Plunkett Latham, resident, informed the Park Board that the residents she has been
talking to who live closest to the parks and use the parks the most feel that they are not
being heard. She stated that if someone asked her what Weber Park looks like she could
not tell you because she has never used it, however, there are other parks that she does
use and does have very specific feelings about. Ms. Latham indicated that if the Park
Board does go forward with a general survey, which has been done before, hopefully it
will be more particular than the last survey. She commented that she does think the Park
Board needs to talk to the residents by each specific park even though it may not be as
important on the broad page but to the people who are using the parks the small things
are important and that she feels there does need to be some sort of mechanism for hearing
that.
Ms. Presthus pointed out that Edina is designed in quadrants which are very easy to
define and the way it is set up rarely do the people move across their quadrants to use the
facilities on the other side. Therefore, maybe they should look at holding open forums to
discuss issues in quadrants instead of individual parks which would cut down a little bit
on the one on one.
Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks the whole process will be both very specific and very
broad at the same time. He commented that there's no such thing as bad information so it
would be great to hear from people even regarding the smallest things such as emptying a
garbage can more frequently. Mr. Keprios stated that the key thing at the end of the
survey is to identify what are the real issues of the community that we want to try to
identify and validate. They are going to need to validate the issues that they feel they've
identified through the public hearings, meetings, etc.
Ms. Latham pointed out that she likes the idea of quadrants and feels that would be good
particularly for the local parks. However, for regional parks such as Centennial Lakes
and Bredesen Park people do cross over the quadrants and therefore she would suggest
5
that they designate public hearings for the regional parks where anyone could attend the
meeting.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
V. 2006 PARK BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that they will only have meetings when they need to
and pointed out there is no Park Board meeting scheduled for July because of the
Braemar Inspection Tour.
Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE 2006 PARK BOARD MEETING
CALENDAR. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
VI. OUTDOOR HOCKEY RINKS
Mr. Sorem indicated that he thought this would be a good time to discuss the outdoor
hockey rinks in Edina. He noted that he thinks the Park Board needs to look at whether
Edina has enough hockey rinks or are more needed. He commented that Todd Park will
need to be looked at again in a couple of years and if they decide Todd Park is not
working they will need to decide if they should put it at a different location or they may
find they don't even need another rink. Mr. Sorem stated that, on a personal note, he has
skated at the Todd Park hockey rink five times this year and the ice has been fantastic
even with the bad weather.
Mr. Sorem informed the Park Board that a resident who lives across the street from Todd
Park approached him to let him know that he loves the rink and noted that he was one of
the residents opposed to it. The resident told him that by having removable boards he
thinks it's perfect.
Mr. Sorem stated as far as Countryside Park's master plan they will need to decide in the
future whether they want to put a hockey rink back there and if so would it be to replace
the one taken out or would it be an additional hockey rink. He stressed that he really
likes the idea of having a rink in Braemar's parking lot. Mr. Sorem noted that he would
like to see the Park Board put a little bit of time and effort into talking with Mr. Thayer
and staff about the possibilities of putting a rink there. He noted that he thinks it would
be plenty big and if they were able to get a Zamboni out there the ice would definitely be
good and therefore thinks it would be a great option to look into. Mr. Sorem indicated
that he thinks they should also look into both portable and permanent refrigeration
systems. He stated that he thinks people from EHA would pay for outdoor ice with a
refrigeration system. Mr. Sorem stated this is not something that needs to be done right
now but it is something to look at to be ahead of the curve.
Mr. Klus indicated that he would hope that this is something they can discuss and
somehow incorporate into the needs assessment as they move ahead. Mr. Klus pointed
Gol
out that supposedly there are two new ice rinks being added to the community by a
private owner to which the first one was supposed to open this month. Mr. Keprios
replied they have not yet begun construction.
Mr. Keprios asked Ms. Presthus what it cost for St. Paul to put in their refrigeration
system at the Landmark Center. Ms. Presthus replied they have been using temporary
chillers but are now looking at turning that into a permanent facility. She explained that
by permanent she means it would not be there year round but that the infrastructure
would be there year round and that the chiller would then be moved to the basement of
the Landmark Center. Ms. Presthus indicated that the grant she is currently writing is for
putting in the chiller, boards, electrical, etc. and is for a little over $300,000 which does
not include the maintenance of it. Mr. Keprios asked Ms. Presthus if they own the
temporary system or are they leasing it. Ms. Presthus replied that currently they are
renting the temporary system and noted that they are responsible for putting it in and
taking it out. She added that the rink is open from November through February 12th. Mr.
MacHolda asked what the charge is to use the rink to which Ms. Presthus indicated there
is no charge.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that they are on a two year track with the Todd Park venture and
they will have to re-evaluate it in two years. He indicated that he has already been
meeting with representatives from the neighborhood and has already come up with a
whole list of questions that he would like for them to respond to. He noted that he is
® meeting with this group again in two weeks to go over some things and will also include
some questions for EHA and the park users. Mr. Keprios stated that at the end of two
years the question will become do you want a rink at Todd Park and if so, is it going to be
permanent or portable. He added that in two years when they do make a recommendation
to the City Council they need to be mindful that with the staff they currently have in
place they cannot maintain any more than what they have. They would not be able to
keep the one at Todd Park and put in hockey rinks at both Countryside Park and Braemar
without adding more staff.
Ms. Presthus explained that the rink at the Landmark Center in St. Paul is a public/private
cooperative in that the city maintains it but it's being built by grants and private money.
She noted that maybe they should consider looking at getting a corporate sponsor who
wants to put money into it or write a grant so that the only responsibility the city would
have would be to maintain it and run the other infrastructure. Mr. Klus commented that
the feedback he has received is that the city isn't always excited about having corporate
sponsors putting their names on things within the city. However, they do have a
mechanism for fundraising in this community which is the Edina Foundation and they
help enhance groups to do things on a bigger focus.
Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that they did try to build a third rink at Braemar
through a grant as well as offered naming rights and that didn't go anywhere.
7
Ms. Presthus informed the Park Board that she received an unsolicited comment from
someone who was at Todd Park. The person indicated that there were a ton of people
skating at Todd Park and with the lights it was an almost magical looking experience.
Mr. Finsness asked what has been the general consensus regarding Todd Park to which
Mr. Keprios replied that he is only hearing from the folks who are obviously opposed to
it. Mr. Klus commented that it's the same people who are writing the same issues and the
only thing that will make them happy is to get rid of the hockey rink.
VII. UPDATES
A. Potentially Proposed Building at Braemar - Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that a
group of individuals in Edina is currently working with the city on looking at the
possibility of putting up a 9 million dollar structure at Braemar Park. At this time the
city is waiting to hear back from the group. Mr. Klus noted that this group is hoping
to raise 3 million of it privately and finance 6 million.
Mr. Keprios explained that the city has been in the discussion stage with this group
for over a year. This group is proposing to take over the golf dome and convert it
into a much larger dome to accommodate golf, soccer, football, and a whole variety
of other things. Mr. Keprios indicated that staff has expressed to them that the
facility may be too big and have a negative impact on the site. This group has been
asked to scale it down and show them exactly what it is they are doing as well as
who's going to use it, how often, what they would charge and how they are going to
retire the debt service and secure the mortgage. Mr. Keprios commented that they
have not come back with their answers but they definitely have generated excitement
in the community.
Mr. Klus noted that this group did want to come to the Park Board tonight to talk
about this structure, however, he felt it was premature and that right now they need to
work with the city and staff and when they come up with something more realistic,
then bring it to the Park Board.
B. Gymnasium Construction — Mr. MacHolda informed the Park Board that there was a
Joint Powers Oversight Committee meeting this morning. He indicated that they
went over the change orders which to date are approximately $81,000. He stated that
they learned that substantial completion should take place the end of July which is
right on schedule.
Ms. Presthus asked what the status of the concession stand is to which Mr. MacHolda
replied that it is part of the project and that the only item that is pending is the
canopy. He noted that Council Member Scot Housh is very hopeful that the
contingency fund will not be eaten up and that dollars will be available to put up a
canopy. Mr. MacHolda pointed out that the concession stand is on the ECC site and
not the South View site.
C. Edina Youth Sports Taskforce — Mr. Klus thanked the Park Board members who
attended the December Task Force meeting. He noted that he thought the forum went
very well and felt that the people who were there were pleased they were able to give
their input. He stated that the next Task Force meeting will be this Thursday and all
of the athletic associations and clubs will be able to share their thoughts on this issue.
Mr. Klus commented that a survey was sent out to each of the associations/clubs to
which they received a lot of feedback and information. He indicated that their intent
is to take all of the input they have received and at the end they will have another
public session. He stated that in February they will come back with some
recommendations to discuss. Mr. Klus noted that in March he hopes to have the final
draft to bring to the Park Board for their approval and will then be sent on the City
Council. He pointed out that there are great people working on this Task Force and
he has been very pleased with the community's involvement.
Mr. Finsness pointed out that it's incredible the amount of responses they received
through e-mails. He noted that their biggest problem is probably going to be sifting
through everything in order to get a sense of which way to go.
Ms. Presthus commented that she thinks a lot of the people who spoke up really don't
understand the purpose of this but rather want to discuss their little individual issues.
Mr. Sorem indicated that he thinks this was the first chance for a lot of people to
complain and get things off their chests because they've been asked their thoughts on
these issues. Mr. Klus stated that at this point he would rather the Task Force listen
to what the people have to say. Ms. Presthus replied that unfortunately what happens
with something like that is that you hear more about the person complaining. She
noted that you practically have to drag it out of the people who have had good
experiences because they're happy and don't feel there is a real need for a Task
Force.
Mr. Klus explained that they don't want to hurt the great volunteer parents who run
these associations/clubs because they don't want to make these volunteers think it's
going to be a real problem to run the associations based on what they have been
doing. He noted that they want to keep a good environment out there so parents
continue to be involved and take leadership roles in the associations/clubs. He added
that sometimes there is better leadership than others but that is part of the cycle.
Mr. Sorem indicated that he feels if they pull back the reins too much that the
program will essentially shut down. Ms. Presthus pointed out that they also have to
watch that they don't bring the top down to the bottom because that is what some
people want. Mr. Klus replied that sometimes he thinks that maybe they cut kids off
too soon and they don't let them experience things. He noted that he really does think
there are ways they can do that without hurting the top and that's something they will
have to discuss very hard. One of the issues they are hearing is access to different
levels of competition and he doesn't disagree with that.
6
Mr. MacHolda stated that he has a tough time with the word cut because he thinks
that can be a misconception and that they should use the word placement instead
because they really are two different things. He pointed out that he also thinks that a
child is more likely to develop if they are at the appropriate level because pre -puberty
and post -puberty can make a huge difference.
Ms. Presthus commented that if there are ten players on a basketball team do you
want to be the 10th player on the A team knowing you will get little playing time or
do you want to be on the B team and play the whole time. It's really a matter of
perception and how that child and parent feel.
Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks the timing is right to study this issue. He noted
that it's an important issue and not just one for Edina. He added that a lot of people
from other communities did attend the meeting. Mr. Keprios stated that at the end of
this he hopes that the community will have an even greater appreciation for our
volunteers and the process and checks and balances they already have in place. He
commented that he thinks some of the associations feel a little underappreciated and
he can understand that. He noted that he thinks once they get through all of the data
that the Task Force and Park Board are going to learn that they really have a good
system in place. Also, through the needs assessment survey could help to identify
what the real issues are and what issues need to be fixed. Mr. Keprios commented
that he thinks there are going to be better things in place when the Park Board has
completed the mission.
VIII. OTHER
A. Blair Ransom - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he received a letter from
Blair Ransom, the student member that came to their Park Board meeting and asked
to play at Centennial Lakes. He noted that they were able to raise over $1,100.00 for
the hurricane relief fund.
B. Braemar Golf Course — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Braemar Golf
Course will be hosting the National Wheelchair games this year.
C. Cliff French — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that there have been only four
Edina Park and Recreation Directors since the Department was created. He noted that
the first Park Director in Edina was Clifton E. French who went on to develop
Hennepin Parks which is now known as Three Rivers District Park. He noted that
Mr. French passed away unexpectedly over the weekend.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Andy Finsness MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:40 PM. Todd Fronek
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.
10
TODD PARK HOCKEY AND GENERAL SKATING RINK
CONCERNS AND CRITERIA TO BE MONITORED
Earlier this year, the Edina City Council voted to provide an outdoor hockey rink at Todd
Park for the 2006/2007 and 2007/2008 winter skating seasons with the caveat that the
hockey rink boards must be removed in the spring and re -installed in the fall each year.
The City Council has also directed staff to monitor the use of the Todd Park hockey rink
over the next two years and complete an assessment by July 1, 2007, as to the
appropriateness of continuing the hockey rink at that location. The City Council also
directed staff to study Garden Park, Lewis Park, and other alternate sites and present the
findings by July 1, 2007.
The terms "appropriate and satisfactory" leave a'lot of subjectivity to the analysis and
assessment of an outdoor hockey rink; however, I would like to believe that we all will
play an important role in monitoring and judging the appropriateness of the hockey rink
and its location. When I say "we," I mean for it to include residents, park users, the
Edina Hockey Association, and staff. It is my wish that our meeting on November 30
will result in brainstorming constructive ideas that will help further identify the roles we
can all play to assess the appropriateness of the hockey rink and its location.
The following is a first draft attempt at how we, as staff, view our role in the process and
• the list of criteria that we feel are important to measure and analyze. As you will notice, I
am requesting and would appreciate your input on some of the data collection process,
such as frequency of counts, location of parked cars, etc.
USE
The raw data on rink use will be compared with all other hockey rinks at the end of the
two-year study. The data will be comparable because the collection frequency and
methodology will be similar. The data can also be compared to previous year attendance
records.
Measure the scheduled use of the hockey rink by the Edina Hockey Association.
(Data will be collected by part-time City staff. The same counting methods and
frequency will be used at all other rinks).
Measure the scheduled use of the hockey rink by groups other than the Edina
Hockey Association. (Data will be collected by part-time City staff. The same
counting methods and frequency will be used at all other rinks).
Measure the non-scheduled use by the general public on both the hockey rink and
general skating rink. (Data will be collected by part-time City staff. The same
counting methods and frequency will be used at all other rinks).
n
U
PARKING
In my view, the traffic safety factor is an important concern. Measuring the change in
traffic/pedestrian safety will be a challenge in that we do not have data from past years
and I would appreciate committee input on methodology on this matter.
• Measure the number of parked cars along Division Street and Vandervork Ave.
(Data will be collected by part-time staff. Discuss frequency of car counts and
their locations).
QUALITY OF ICE
There were residents concerned that it is not reasonable to assume that staff can develop
and maintain quality outdoor skating ice at the Todd Park hockey rink site due to poor
soil conditions. I suggest that we seek opinions from staff and ice rink users regarding
ice quality. Are there others that should be consulted?;
•
Document maintenance staff's analysis of their own ability to maintain quality ice
(Professional maintenance staff will provide their opinion regarding the feasibility
of maintaining quality ice at that site location).
• Gather and document hockey rink user opinion about quality of ice. (Discuss
suggestions for collecting opinion data).
PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY
In my view, public opinion is another very important part of the assessment process in
analyzing its success and appropriateness of location. I would recommend that public
opinion surveys be drafted with input from concerned residents and facility users. It
would be helpful to get community input on the questions that should be asked in the
public opinion surveys to ensure that the survey appropriately addresses concerns of the
residents and facility users. I would recommend that the Edina Park and Recreation
Department create two surveys; one for local residents; and one for scheduled hockey
rink users, such as, Edina Hockey Association coaches, parents, board members, and/or
commissioners.
I suspect that some of the issues of concern for residents would include aesthetics, noise
nuisance, increased traffic levels, on -street parking nuisance, hockey rink lights nuisance,
loss of open space, and general change of character for the park. Some residents may not
be affected or offended by any of those issues and would prefer to have the hockey rink
in their neighborhood park.
For the local residents' public opinion survey, I would suggest we mail the survey in
March of 2007 to all residents within approximately 1,000 feet of the park. I suggest
asking the head of household their opinions on statements that can be ranked from
strongly agree, or agree, or disagree, or strongly disagree, or no opinion; such as:
Resident Public Opinion Survey
• I prefer that the Todd Park hockey rink be removed permanently and located at a
different Edina park site.
• I like the addition of the Todd Park hockey rink.
• I prefer that the hockey rink be a permanently installed wood structure similar to
all other outdoor hockey rinks in Edina's parks.
• I prefer that the Todd Park hockey rink continue to be removed at the end of each
skating season.
• I prefer the wood structure hockey board system over the plastic board system.
• The new hockey rink lights are an unacceptable nuisance.
• The new hockey rink generates noise that is at an unacceptable nuisance.
• The additional traffic in the neighborhood as a result of the hockey rink is an
unacceptable nuisance and/or unreasonable safety hazard.
The additional on -street parking in the neighborhood as a result of the hockey rink
is an unacceptable nuisance and/or unreasonable safety hazard.
ip The hockey rink has significantly changed the aesthetic character of the park to an
unacceptable level. -
• The hockey rink has significantly changed my family's ability to use the park's
open space to an unacceptable level.
• If a permanently hockey rink were installed, it would significantly change my
family's ability to use the park's open space to an unacceptable level.
• One or more members of my family use the park more often during the winter
months because of the addition of the hockey rink.
• The addition of the Todd Park hockey rink has added value to the homes in the
neighborhood.
• The addition of the Todd Park hockey rink has negatively affected my property
value.
With input from the community, I believe we can come up with a very comprehensive list
of statements to measure public opinion on a number of resident's concerns. I would
greatly appreciate resident input on that process. The resident public opinion survey
could also ask the responder to list the number of children in the household, the
frequency of hockey rink use by family members, and household distance from the park.
The survey could also request their input on any other concerns that have not been
addressed in the survey statements and ask for any further suggestions that would help
the City Council make well-informed decisions on this important issue.
As mentioned earlier, part of staff's responsibility is to also analyze the appropriateness
of the hockey rink and its location and study other potential alternate park sites. To
measure the hockey rink's success and appropriateness of location with respect to
scheduled uses, it seems to make sense to generate an opinion survey to be distributed to
Edina Hockey Association parents, coaches, commissioners, and board members. With
their help, I envision some of the statements, ranked similar to the above format, might
include:
Todd Park Hockey Rink Scheduled Rink User Opinion Survey
• I prefer that the Todd Park hockey rink be removed permanently and located at a
different Edina park site.
• I like the addition of the Todd Park hockey rink.
• I prefer that the hockey rink be a permanently installed wood structure similar to
all other outdoor hockey rinks in Edina's parks.
•. I like the plastic board hockey rink system.
• The Todd Park hockey rink is too difficult to find.
• I prefer to use other Edina outdoor hockey rinks rather than Todd Park.
• The plastic hockey boards have a negative effect on the game of hockey.
• I don't care that Todd Park has a hockey rink or not.
• I prefer having the hockey rink at Todd Park as opposed to Countryside Park.
• The on -street parking scenario at Todd Park is unacceptable.
• The on -street parking scenario at Todd Park is unsafe.
• The on -street parking scenario at 'Todd Park is too inconvenient.
e ' The quality of skating ice at Todd Park is excellent.
• The larger park shelter building at Todd Park is a significant improvement and
attraction compared to the Countryside Park shelter building.
• The location of the eleventh outdoor hockey rink is not an issue.
• I would not mind having the hockey rink placed back at Countryside Park and
not having one at Todd Park.
Other questions could be drawn to ask the responder which location they would prefer
there be a hockey rink if Todd Park no longer had a hockey rink. Open-ended questions
could ask what makes one outdoor hockey rink more desirable than another; and what are
in your opinion the most desirable site locations.
STUDY OF ALTERNATE LOCATIONS
As directed by the City Council, staff will spend some time reviewing the advantages and
disadvantages of alternate park locations to place an outdoor hockey rink. As we look at
alternate locations, we will analyze the following:
• Availability of off-street parking.
• Close proximately of residential homes.
• Ability to maintain quality ice at that site.
• Displacement of other existing recreational opportunities and/or other park
functions.
• Desire (public opinion) of the neighborhood to welcome a hockey rink to that
location.
• Access to a park shelter building with restroom facilities.
• Ability to place an appropriate size rink in the proper north/south orientation.
• Current need for scheduled outdoor hockey rink use.
• Access to fire hydrant for making ice.
• Access for maintenance equipment.
• General impact on the character and aesthetics of the park.
Thank you for your input, it is greatly appreciated.
•
Memo
To: Mayor Hovland and Vince Cockriel.
From: John Keprios, Director
Cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager.
Date: February 14, 20066
Re: Site visit to hockey rinks.
This is a recap of the site visits that Mayor Hovland, Vince Cockriel, and I took on Friday,
February 3, 2006, to view the different hockey rink lighting levels at three different outdoor
hockey rinks.
TODD PARK
At 6:15 a.m. on February 3rd, we started the site visit at Todd Park. Vince Cockriel took a
light meter reading in the front yard of the closest house to the west of the Todd Park hockey
rink. The meter read .004. After all four hockey rink lights were turned on and, the light
level was measured again at the exact same location in the neighbor's front yard. The light
meter again read .004.
The other light level readings taken at Todd Park with the lights on were:
Southwest corner of hockey rink 54.1
Southeast comer of hockey rink 2.2
Center of hockey rink 8.1
General rink .005
9 Page
1
HIGHLANDS PARK
At 6:30 a.m., we arrived at Highlands Park and recorded the following light meter readings
with all rink lights turned on:
Southeast corner of hockey rink 73.9
Center of hockey rink 14.4
General rink 1.7
Neighbor's side yard property line 1.7
The neighbor's side yard property line was not measured prior to turning on the lights.
WALNUT RIDGE PARK
At 6:45 a.m., we arrived at Walnut Ridge Park and recorded the following light meter
readings with all the rink lights turned on:
Southeast corner of hockey rink 9.3
Northwest corner of hockey rink 25.8
Center of hockey rink 9.7
General rink 3.4
Walnut Ridge Park hockey rink lights have a six -pole system with lights at a height of only
about 15 feet, which cause more spill than the two -pole system that has light fixtures at
approximately 45 feet. The taller two -pole system used at Highlands Park and Todd Park
allow light fixtures to be pointed more directly toward the ground rather than at an angle
required if they were set at only 15 feet off the ground. It was noted that the six -pole system
at Walnut Ridge Park would not be a good alternative for Todd Park due to the excessive
spill and glare.
It was also noted that only four of the eight light fixtures are being used at Todd Park (two
on each pole). Visors and concentric deflectors were installed on those four light fixtures at
Todd Park the week of January 23, 2006. Only two light fixtures on the south light pole are
used during the early morning rink maintenance period.
2
0 Page
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor Hovland and members of
Agenda Item
V. D.
the Edina City Council.
From: John Keprios, Director
Consent
❑
❑
Park & Recreation Department
Information Only
Date: May 17, 2005
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
❑
To Council
❑
Subject: Off -Leash Dog Park Proposal -
Motion
Van Valkenburg Park.
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
The Park Board recommends that a portion of Van Valkenburg Park be developed into an
off -leash dog park. The Park Board also recommends an annual user fee of $25 for
residents and $50 for non-residents.
INFO/BACKGROUND:
At the April 12, 2005, Park Board meeting, a motion was made and passed unanimously
to build an interim off -leash dog park at Van Valkenburg Park contingent upon 50% of
the funding coming from donations via the Edina Community Foundation. The motion
also included a recommendation that there would be an annual user fee of $25 per year
for residents and $50 per year for non-residents.
Since that Park Board meeting, I have received a verbal commitment from a dog owner
proponent of the concept who is willing to donate $5,000 towards the fencing expenses.
The current donations policy requires a minimum $5,000 donation to receive a permanent
recognition plaque at the site. We have currently secured two bids for purchase and
installation of fencing needed to create the off -leash dog park. We are expecting a third
quote within the next few days. We anticipate that the lowest bid will be under $9,100
total, which means that the Edina Park Maintenance Department budget would have to
fund a maximum of $4,100 out of our operating budget to cover the cost of fencing and
installation.
Attached to this report is a copy of the Off -Leash Dog Area Feasibility Study done by
Ingraham & Associates back on April 3, 2001. The study identified four areas as
potential off -leash dog park areas. The Braemar Park site is not longer an option due to
the development of the South Metro Training Facility. The Edina Lacrosse Association
now heavily uses the Walnut Ridge Park site as an athletic field. The only remaining two
sites in his study are Creek Valley Park and Van Valkenburg Park. The Minneapolis
Water Works Department site near- Weber Park is still not an option because the City of
Minneapolis continues to be unwilling to enter into an agreement to use the property for
that purpose at this time.
According to Animal Control Officer, Timothy Hunter, there are 1,574 known
households with dogs, and 1,765 registered dogs in the city, 549 of which are in the
northwest quadrant where Van Valkenburg Park is located. Based on national statistics,
Mr. Hunter suspects that Edina may have as many as 7,000 to 8,000 dogs in Edina
households. The Park Board has been working hard for the past five years to find a
suitable off -leash dog park location that best serves the community. Based on
community input and observation over the past several years, the Park Board and Animal
Control Officer and staff believe that the time is right to offer this service.
is
This concept and proposal is similar to a very successful off -leash dog park recently
established in St. Louis Park at their Bass Lake Preserve location. In their first year of
operation, they sold 133 permits and have had very few minor problems. Dog owners
will be required to pick-up and properly dispose of their dog's feces. Off -leash dog
permits will also require that the dog be properly licensed as required by ordinance.
There will be a sign that displays the off -leash dog park site rules, which would include:
No person may bring into the off -leash area site:
• A dangerous dog.
• A female dog in heat.
• More than three dogs at one time.
• A dog that is not wearing tags showing that it is currently registered and
vaccinated in compliance with Edina City Code.
Any person who brings a dog into the off -leash area site shall:
• Carry materials for removing and disposing of dog excreta and remove all
excreta deposited by the dog in the off -leash site.
• Lead the dog on a leash and retain the dog in custody when entering and
exiting the off -leash site.
• Keep the dog under visual and voice control at all times while in the off -
leash site.
• Fill any hole that the dog digs in the off -leash site.
• Remove the dog from the off -leash site at the first sign of aggression.
•
The Park Board recommends using the Van Valkenburg Park site as identified by the
consultant as an interim off -leash dog park location contingent upon donations to match
or exceed 50% of the total cost of fencing; and recommends charging an annual user fee
of $25 for residents and $50 for non-residents. The Park Board prefers to designate this
proposal as an interim site with the understanding that it is a pilot project. The Park
Board wants to reserve the right to discontinue the park's use as an off -leash dog if, for
whatever reason, the initiative is not successful at that site. With assistance from the
Edina Police and Animal Control Officer, staff will continually evaluate the park use and
make recommendations to the Park Board on an annual basis. The intent is to consider
this an interim site each year for the next two or three years, after which point it will no
longer be considered an interim site.
If approved by Council, this will require a change in the existing Ordinance, which
currently does not permit dogs to be off leash in Edina parks. The revised Ordinance
would then be placed on the June 7, 2005, Council agenda for consideration. If approved
by Council, staff will submit a purchase order request for fencing and appropriate
signage. As soon as the park is in place, annual passes will go on sale and could be
purchased online, by mail, or at City Hall.
OFF -LEASH DOG PARK PROPOSAL AT VAN VALKENBURG PARK
PRESENTED
Director Keprios explained at the April 12, 2005, Park Board meeting, a motion was
made and passed unanimously to build an interim off -leash dog park at Van
Valkenburg Park contingent upon 50% of the funding coming from donations from
the Edina Community Foundation. The motion also recommended a $25.00 annual
user fee for residents and $50.00 per year for non-residents.
Mr. Keprios said he received a verbal commitment from a dog owner who was a
proponent of the project who was willing to donate $5,000 towards the expense of
fencing the park. The current donations policy requires a minimum donation of
$5,000 to have a recognition plaque affixed at the site. Currently two bids have been
received for fencing installation with the expectation of receiving one more bid. It
was anticipated that the cost of fencing would be approximately $10,000 for the
park, which would require additional funds to be expended from the Park
Maintenance Department budget.
No person would be allowed to bring into the off -leash area a dangerous dog, a
female dog in heat, more than three dogs at a time or a dog that was not wearing
tags showing that it was currently licensed and vaccinated. Any person with a dog
in the park must carry materials for removing and disposing of dog excreta, lead the
animal on a leash when entering and exiting the area, keep the dog under visual and
voice control at all times, fill in any hole dug by the dog and remove the dog from
the site at the first sign of aggression.
Mr. Keprios indicated the existing ordinance, which currently does not permit dogs
to be off -leash in Edina parks would be revised and placed on the June 7, 2005,
Council Agenda for consideration. If approved, staff would submit a purchase order
request for fencing and appropriate signage. When the park was finished, annual
passes would go on sale and could be purchased online, by mail or at City Hall.
The Park Board recommended a portion of Van Valkenburg Park be developed into
an off -leash dog park and recommends annual user fees of $25.00 for residents and
$50.00 for non-residents.
Member Masica questioned what the actual acreage of the site is. Mr. Keprios said
the area to be fenced would be 1.7 acres. Ms. Masica asked if there was a firm
commitment for the $5,000 donation. Mr. Keprios responded a verbal commitment
has been received. Ms. Masica asked what the maintenance costs would be on the
park. Mr. Keprios said maintenance should be at a minimum but could require some
additional law-enforcement dollars.
Member Hulbert asked if the grass in the park would survive. Mr. Keprios said that
was an unknown.
Tim Hunter, Animal Control Officer, said he would educate persons using the park
about licensing and registering their dogs. He has not settled upon the type of
identification method the dog would need in order to use the park. Mr. Hunter
suggested the fee would be on a per dog basis because of wear and tear on
enforcement at this park.
Mayor Hovland asked what type of enforcement would be used at the park. Mr.
Hunter said while it was assumed that the park, like parks in other communities,
would be self -policing, initially there would be more focus on the park.
Member Hulbert asked if a four -foot fence was adequate. Mr. Keprios said that was
the standard height typically used in off -leash parks.
Member Swenson moved approval of an off -leash dog park on an interim basis at
Van Valkenburg Park with an annual fee of $25.00 for residents and $50.00 for
non-residents. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.